The Feudal History of the County of Derby; (chiefly During the 11th, 12th ...

Google

This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project

to make the world's books discoverable online.

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject

to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books

are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.

Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the

publisher to a library and finally to you.

Usage guidelines

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.

+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.

+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe.

About Google Book Search

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web

at |http: //books .google .com/I

y\^ ^.^ ^T<^ ^^^ 4.% tr.t4 4T-». ^:^ 4T4 i:r,^ ^.T^. ^r.ti ^T-^ i^-^ ^T^ >.^ >T4. ir^%.T+ ,. .:; x

« A A

4 ».*^

, ^ i- 'J-^ CVi ^A^ '"♦> ^^

'^t'^'x^ ?^t5 '"v'i o3 r-f

, + r iJ-^ ^O '^J> c-Q ^*

, i . . Oi^ CO ^j' (M ^-

wpfip'^pipp^^^

IfijUeTnory of

STEPHEN SPAULDING

mmmm

190/ - /9^5

CLASS y /y*7

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

iiiitr' I'l'm ' rill- 1

. . ^ 1 1 , it ■ I ^fc 1 - — ■ V ¥

-^►'i«i.V.,,Vv ■ .^

^- • ^^ — ♦ • 1^1

•-•-• 4»«4- •-•^ -f-

^4f ^^i^O"i^-*PCO^'^-

- • 4" --^^^ ^ • ♦ •— *^ 4» • + •— •:

r-o '^^^ CO ^- -^ CO

• X •-•— • x..x» — .^v«^.^»_«-« ^.4.9^»_« XvX »-»— ♦x>'4-» » •'X.x •— •-« x.«x*-.— • XvX •-•-•'^« X »- • • 4

fe ^^cf>^^*c+:>^3t:-o^-^7^^^^

••4" •—•-• X'-X*— •— • X.X.»~«-« X •■X»— •-••X*'X»—«— •X* X •--•-♦ -X-X-*—-* 4>*'T •-— • "T •*♦••-•"• ■T"*'T' ♦-• ♦ 4

• •4" •^*:c" ♦•♦ •— ♦=* ♦•♦••-•^-« ▼•♦ •-•-• 4*^ ♦-•— • ▼ ••** •—• — • + • 4 •— — • X • + •— •— • 4 • + •-»— • 4 • 4- •^^ -• -

pCV^J>3/T^j4^r-r-^J:t3/T^^^^^^

i4' •-•^ ♦•♦ • « • ♦ •4 •-^•^ ▼•^ •-•-• 4*«^ t-^*^ +• + •-•-♦ "T-^T •-•-« 4 • T •--•—• + *4 •-♦-♦ 4 • ^ •— •-• -

■ ^T^^f^3rv;^f3cT;^i^'y_^

x*— •— •4"*4*"*~*Hr*4"^"*~*4"i*~*~*"T*'X'* •-«-.

4
4

!.rx^?r42^x^rfl

.V . ? 4 ^^V-C 4

p •

- - * -.V/ '^A^i'T^-^^^ ^r^I^ ^T-^ ^J^J ' ^'*^^ ^•'''^^^ ^J^' ^^^^^ '^^J C^^'^ ^^ C> ""- ^-^ ^ » >' ^ ^3^f ^ ^-^^ .V^'^. 'vij
r* 1 * X'T^*— ^■T" + *~":z:*'T*'T'*3!r* "T'T* *:=^^ ▼•▼»!;•-• '^•*4» •rz*-* ^'"^ •—•-• 4'«4- •-• -•^•4» •^•^ •^•-^ •^•^ 4'»4' •— •

t ; - - ~ ^> / '^V+x'^J^ CO'^jt; C-^i ^ 02 '^-^ C^2 '^^ ^^^-^-Q ^y^^^^y^^'%h C^^-i-J

^ • ' -* 7" "T •— •-• X'"T'*~*~* "V*'T ♦i:':^* "♦""T" •— • -• ^'^ •— •<• -^ ••*• •— •-•^•* •^-•-» ^a*^ •—•— • 4> '^ •— •— • ^« ^^ ^^^.^ ^ . 4. ». ,---•

^ -^' ^ -L^^i ^-:^(? r 'o^^ C-tv ^x^ .ri> fijjtvrciJ^4'^^ "^^v^^ 3

»» . ^ 4- .^•—.-^ ^^.^.^^.-L.»^^ 4" 4- "—^ 4'4»-^*^4"4«^*'^ 4*4 •^•^ 4*4'»^» -• 4*4 •^•"^ 4*4 ^•'-* 4«+ •^•-»

• • .T:4-^'^.4":4:'^r^:f :4:r:::z?:t-4: •:Ei^4:+»:rr::5>:4:^»-^.4:4^

^^ "^^ 1^ ^-^ t*?Q^^^^ — '

4^4 •^•-::* 4*4 *^*c* r^ ! 4 •r;*":* 4*4 •- • -•

; •4x';^^04^'^r^Ct^>T<^C^^ ^-^-:^ i^:^ ^^ Q^l ^^J i^l ^^ t^+I^^ C42 '^-^-^ iTi ^.^ ^^'2 '^J

1 • -r; 4 •::^^T:;4:»::^:^+:-f •^^^ 4*!4* •^•^ ♦•♦. ^.^ 4- •> •^^4i-f •=^'"=« 4*4 •^•^ 4.T^^.< -*«T^ ^.t:;4.T-j. ;:r.r:;

-1^ •) /^jl"^ f ^ •> r^l"-^ (» •.

B ^-^i-^s. •

i - • * • .^""^A.

This small paper Edition

of the

" Feudal History of the County of Derby "

is limited to joo Copies.

No. 7^ ^/^y^t^j^ J<ti ao^^

HA

THE

FEUDAL HISTORY

OF THE

Countis of 2)erbi?:

{.Chiefly during tht lUA, 12/A, and lyh Centuries y)

BY

JOHN PYM YEATMAN, ESQ.,

{Of Lincoln's Inn^ Barrister*at-LaWy formerly of Emmanuel
College^ Cambridge^ and F,R,H,S,t 6*f.)

AuTHOK OF "Thb Early Gknbalogical History of the Housb of Arundbl;" "Thk
History of the Common Law of Great Britain and Gaul;" "An Introduction to thk
Study of Early English History;" "The Mayor's Court Act, 1857;" "An Introduc-
tion TO THE History of the House of Glanvillb:" ^'A Treatise on the Law of
Trades Marks;" "The Origin of the Nations of western Europe;" "The Records
OF Chesterfield;** "A Treatise on the Law of Ancient Demesne;" "The Domesday
Book for the County of Derby ;" " The Fife Rolls for the Counties of Nottingham
and Derby;" "The Lost Certificates of Knight's Fees;" and *'An Exposure of the

Mismanagement of thk Public Record Office," etc., etc.

. • • •

• • • : •

•' And by

SIR GEO. R. SITWELL. BART., M.P., F.S.A.,

Joimt Editor ^ the Hundred qf Scartdale;

AND

CECIL J. S. FOLJAMBE, ESQ., M.P„ F.S.A.,

JptHt Editor <if ike Hundred of High Ptak.

VOL. I. -SECTION II.

Xon&on :

BEMROSE & SONS, 23, OLD BAILEY; AND DERBY.
LONDON AND OXFORD: PARKER & Co.
CHESTERFIELD: WILFRED EDMUNDS, "DERBYSHIRE TIMES."

MOCCCLXXXVI.

m

I

SECTION II.

COLLECTIONS FOR THE HISTORY OF
? DERBYSHIRE.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER

FOR THE

COUNTIES OF NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY.

CHAPTER III.

The Red Book of the Exchequer is a volume of rare value and
authority, although it is admittedly only a copy of certain very
ancient records which were kept in the Exchequer, most of
which have long since disappeared. One only of the whole
class of certificates of knights' fees has escaped destruction.
Madox refers to it, and it can be found at the Record Office,
classified as a " seal." In appearance, it in no way differs from
an ordinary charter of the period.

Like Domesday, the Red Book is a purely fiscal document,
and its chief value consists in the fact that it gives full
particulars of certain records of which only the summaries are
given in the Pipe Rolls. The greater part of the book is occupied
with extracts from the Pipe Rolls, made no doubt for the con-
venience of the officers of the Exchequer ; but these are of small
practical value, since they are neither so full nor so accurate as
the originals, and therefore, when they differ, must be summarily
19

266 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

rejected ; but the portions of the book here given are of the
highest value, because the originals are lost, and we have no
other evidence of their contents. They do possess partly the
character of original documents, in the same way that the
" Record " in a law suit is an original document, although in fact
it is only a copy of the pleadings. These copies were no doubt
used by the officers of the Exchequer for the purposes of
assessment. Heme, in his collections, has published the valuable
portion of this book, and of the copy of it called the Black Book
(why so called it is not known, possibly to distinguish between
the book^, one of which was probably kept in the Chancery, and
the other in the Exchequer) ; and it is now proposed to publish
the whole of it ; but inasmuch as the Pipe Roll Society has
undertaken to give those portions from the original, this seems
to be not only unnecessary, but unfortunate, since it is always a
mistake to propagate erroneous accounts.

The author has already given the portion of the Red Book
which is copied from the Pipe Rolls, and proposes now only to
give that which supplements it — namely, the particulars of the
fees of the greater barons, and, unfortunately, only a portion of
them are here to be found, proof that this collection was made
at a late date, when some of this class of documents were lost.
It is very difficult to assign a precise date to any of these
records, but this is clear, that the commonly received idea that
they were returned for the scutage levied upon the marriage of
the daughter of King Henry the Second is a false one, for some
of them date long afterwards.

This is absolutely clear, from the certificate of Wm. Briwere,
who, as it will be shown in the parochial history, had no connec-
tion with Derbyshire until about the fifth year of King Richard
I., when he was Regent. Chesterfield was one of the manors of
the ancient demesne of the Crown, and prior to that date was
farmed by the hospital of lepers at that place, as appears from
the Pipe Rolls of this date ; so, too, other returns show that
some of the barons appearing were dead at that period. Again,
it is abundantly clear that several scutages were assessed from
the same record, and that a scutage was frequently used long
after some of the knights apparently living were dead ; and it is
only when we come to the age of King Henry HI. that any note
of this appears upon the face of the record itself. The scutage

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 267

lists were corrected just as Domesday was made on the Itinerary
of the justices ; and this, too, is apparent, that a fresh certifi-
cate would be only required when there was a change of tenure,
and not upon the occasion of successive taxations^ and this
return would probably last for the life of the baron who made it,
when his successor would make a new one, and the old one
would be discarded.

The aid for marrying the king's daughter was levied in the
14th year of his reign (see page 109) ; and the order in which
the knights are named is different from the order of this docu-
ment, although, with the exception of the name of Warner de
Insula appearing in the first, and that of William Briwere in his
place in the second, they are identical. The brethren of the
hospital are in this record charged for the J fee held subsequently
by William Briwere.

It is quite clear, therefore, from this comparison that these
certificates were not made for the scutage of the 14th Henry II.

Madox gives a note from a Pipe Roll two years earlier,
showing that the certificates of the knights* fees were then kept
in the county (probably only the duplicate copy), for a hutch is
made to receive them. This shows that some were made
prior to 14th Henry II., just as William Briwere's certificate
shows that some were made subsequently ; and this also
establishes the fact that they were made at different times. The
strong probability is, that they were made when there was
occasion for them, that is, when seizin was given to the new
baron. The value of this fact is of wider import than Derby-
shire history, for this assumed date has been acted upon for
centuries, and consequently numerous well-known pedigrees
are wrongly dated.

The Close Rolls show that on every scutage a writ was
addressed to the greater baron to enable him to make his own
return, as well as to the sheriff, to return for the lesser holders,
and for those great barons whose estates were in the king's
hands ; but this does not necessarily imply that a fresh certifi-
cate was given upon each occasion, but only another payment.

The Pipe Rolls show only two other scutages in the reign of
Henry II., one in the eighth year of the king, and that of those
who did. not go with the king's army into Galway, in the
thirty-third year of the king, when Hasculf Musard was dead,

268 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

and it Is generally assumed that there were no other scutages
in his reign, but it should rather be considered that those
assessments were of an extraordinary character, and that the
certificates of knights* fees were made, not only for them, but
for all other exactions of the exchequer, for Danegeld, and
the annual farm of the county. In fact, that just as the
sheriff made returns for the purposes of scutage upon the
inquests taken before the Justices Itinerant from, and including,
the date of Domesday, so those barons who were privileged to
make their own returns, corrected the charters of their own
baronies at the same periods, if it was found necessary to do so.

In the second year of Henry II. (see page lOo), we find
mention of a great variety of payments. Danegeld for both
counties, ;^38 5s.; Burgess aid, ;^I5; Gift of the county,
80 m. ; Farm of the county, ;^I23 14s. id., and rents of the
king's manors for the whole of the county, ;^i8o 14s. This
does not iriclude forfeited estates, for ;f 103 i8s. 6d. was received
for Wm. Peverel's lands, and jCg/\, 6s. 2d. for the rents of his
manors ; for many of these purposes the same assessment would
be requisite.

In 4 Henry 11. (page 104), the sheriff accounted for £g3 $s. 8d.
for the gift of the count}', which was evidently a regular levy,
for the names of some who were excused payment are given.

In 5 Henry II., p. 104, the sheriff again accounted for ;)^i68
of the gift of the county.

In the sixth year, the Earl of Ferrars' estate was in the king's
hands, and in the following year there was evidently an assess-
ment ; and in the eighth of the king both a scutage and
Danegeld were levied ; in fact, payments of some kind were
exacted nearly every year. It is rash, therefore, to assign a
particular date for a scries of documents which were in constant
requisition for a variety of purposes ; and the safe conclusion
seems to be that they were made when they were wanted,
that is, upon a change of tenancy ; and the only certainty seems
to be that they were made under the old system of taxation
derived from and laid down in Domesday, before it was altered
by Archbishop Hubert Walter in 1198. It is highly probable,
though it cannot be put higher, that the Archbishop caused
this collection of documents to be recorded for the purposes of
the new assessment, and that they were recopied with the

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 269

muniments of a later date — when the present Red Book was
composed.

We shall find, when we come to the Testa de Nevil, that
the privilege of the greater barons in making their own
assessments, or returns, was highly valued, and that it was the
subject of fierce contention. No doubt it was also profitable,
as well as honourable, to be independent of the sheriff, and
consequently the privilege was religiously guarded and pre-
served.

The returns for the Counties of Nottingham and D^rby are
given together, since as the names of the manors held by the
several knights are not given, it is impossible to separate
them. We only possess the returns made by the Earl of
Ferrars, Ralf Anselin, Robert de Chaus, Ralf fitz William,
Hubert fitz Ralf, Roger de Huron, and Hasculf Musard, only
seven for both counties out of a total of thirty-two barons
and abbots of the time of Domesday, and only four of these
barons were certainly descended in the male line from the
Domesday holder.

The return, however, of the Earl Ferrars, is of the greatest value,
more especially since he divides it into three distinct periods :
those knights who were enfeoffed by the Domesday holder, the
ancestor of his grandfather, those enfeoffed by his grandfather,
and those of his father s feoffment. This return takes us back,
as respects the greater part of the county, to Domesday itself,
and as to the second portion, to a period commencing within
two years, for Robert de Ferrars, son of the Domesday Baron,
flourished from the year 1088 to the year 11 39, four years
after the death of Henry I. His son, Robert de Ferrars,
flourished from 1139 to 1162, in which year William de
Ferrars, who n^ade the return, came into the possession of
his barony. His return, therefore, could not have been made
earlier than this latter year, though, probably, very soon after,
for he had made no alteration amongst his knights. It will
be observed that the vast majority of the earl's retainers
were enfeoffed by the ancestor of Robert de Ferrars, that is,
prior to 1088, and that, in most cases, the descent of the land
is given to the date of his great grandson.

Now, considering that Henry de Ferrars held no less than
114 manors in Derby alone, and that many of his knights

270 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

held lands under other barons, it will be seen that this return
covers a most important portion of the county, in fact, the
greatest part of it, and doubtless, nearly every one of these
knights have left descendants collateral or direct, who now
survive, and form the staple of the people of the county,
though, in most instances, their descendants, having adopted
local names, have lost all memory and trace of their names
and descent.

Henry Ferrars, the chief landowner of the County of Derby
at Domesday, was of a Norman family, who were of the most
distinguished position, both in Normandy and England. He
was the son of Vauqueline, or Walkelin (as the name is
written in England), Lord of Ferrieres St. Hilaire, near Bernai,
where, even in those days, he had' great ironworks. His
descendants bore the curious title of Premiers Barons Fossiers
de Normandie. It is perhaps not singular that Henry, son of
Vauqueline de Ferrars, should obtain the lordship of one of the
chief mining districts in England. As an instance of the
keenness of the family for mines, Robert de Ferrars, in the first
Pipe Roll, pays ;^8o for the farm of Wirksworth, where the
king had no less than three leadworks, and the large amount
of rent paid shows their value. Vauqueline de Ferrars perished
in one of those lawless feuds which marred the minority ot
Duke William. He and Hugh de Montforte sur Risle, the son
of Toustain de Bastemburg, one of the most proud and violent
of the Norman nobility, levied war upon each other, and
both of them perished in the murderous affray. As this
occurred about 1035 or 36, Henry de Ferrars could not have
been a young man at the time of the conquest of England.
He is perhaps best known as one of the Commissioners who
compiled Domesday for the circuit in which his property lay ;
that is, that as one of the greatest personages of his circuit,

a

the ancient kingdom of Mercia, he was employed as one
of the king's Justices Itinerant. Modern writers are pleased
to assert that Justices Itinerant and their circuits was an in-
vention of several centuries later ; but a series of documents
show that they did exactly the same work as the Domesday
Commissioners, in addition to the work of the Aula Regis ;
in fact, that this part of the work of the Domesday Com-
missioners was, and continued to be a part, and a very material

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 2/ 1

part, of the regular duties of the Justices Itinerant, and that
the circuits they travelled which were coterminous with the
ancient kingdoms into which England was divided, practically
agree with the divisions of the circuits of the present day.

We possess, in a document to be given presently (a fragment),
a specimen of the mode in which scutages were assessed. This
is called Kirby's Quest ; and the only difference between the
method pursued in it and in Domesday is that, in the later
documents, or assize records, only the lesser baronies are
detailed. The great barons, probably on account of their high
rank, made their own returns to the king by their own charters,
under their own hands and seals, which are given here as
certificates of knights* fees. It will be seen that the scutage
lists of the Pipe Rolls give no particulars of the great fi^fs here
given, so that they are, in fact, a supplement to those records.
We invariably learn this from the Pipe Rolls, and no more,
that the Earl of Derby answered for 68J fees. Here, for the
first time, we obtain particulars of his holding ; so the fees of
Hubert fitz Ralf of Domesday, of Ralf Hanselin, and of many
others, are lumped together : here only we obtain the particulars
of them. We obtain from the Pipe Rolls the particulars of the
great fief of William Peverel, because it was in the kings
hands, and that is omitted in this book. In fact, these returns
supplement the other, and together make up a more modern
account of those fees which, at the time of Domesday, paid
scutage to the king. The history of the great baronial family
of Ferrars, although in its younger descendants it has produced
many peerages, has never been correctly given. This will be
attempted in the Parochial portion of the work.

Mr. Llewellynn Jewitt asserts that> Henry de Ferrars held
1 14 manors in Derbyshire alone, and this seems to have been
the number of vills he held ; but it appears from the statement
of his grandson, William Earl of Derby, that he held this vast
estate for the service of sixty knights ; and it would appear that
it was for the service of this number, with half a knight's fee
added, that he enfeoffed some twenty-six knights during his
tenure of the lordship. That (counting the monks of Tutbury,
who would find a substitute) was also the number of tenants
who are recorded in Domesday. One of these knights answered
for the service of five knights ; that is, he was bound to produce

272 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

them equipped for the field when called upon. Five answered
for four each, four answered for three, seven for two, nine for
one, and one for half a knight's fee ; 6oJ altogether. It is not
quite clear how many knights' fees he held in demesne, that is,
kept in his own hands ; but, judging roughly, this will give him
about fifty manors in hand, for which he paid no hide. For this
he would probably be assessed, for the gift of the county ; so
that he would have no difficulty whatever to form his contingent
of the royal army whenever called upon ; and doubtless this
is the list of knights, but with few exceptions, who fought
under him at the great Battle of the Standards. Comparing the
list of his knights as given at Domesday, and that which
appears in his great grandson's certificate, it is very difficult to
reconcMe them ; and yet they must be practically identical, for
he only survived two years after Domesday, and he would
hardly have changed many tenures in that short period. No
doubt the list, as we have it, is the list as it was altered by
deaths and successions during the life of his son, that is, during
fifty years. But still, every one of these tenants, save those
expressly excepted, was a lineal descendant of the Domesday
holder, that is of the knight who was enfeoffisd by Henry de
Ferrars before 1188. It rarely happens that evidence can be
obtained of such close approximation to the date of Domesday.
The general rule is, that proof can only be obtained of a
holding prior to the death of Henry I., nearly fifty years later.
This, therefore, is an especial piece of good fortune for the
Derbyshire families.

Of course this does not apply to those who, in the time of
Earl William, bore a different name. For instance, William de
Hastings does not necessarily descend from Henry Cuneigeston
or Galfry Marmion from Ivo de Heriz, or William Pantoul from
Robert Luvitot, or Henry Hosato from John Turburville,
though they may do so through females, or they may have
been new grantees. In all the other cases where the property
remained in the siame name, the identity may be considered
fairly and conclusively established, and therefore this follows
that the descendants of every one of these knights, with the
exception of the four just mentioned, may claim to possess a
true Domesday pedigree. Perhaps no other county in England
can claim this right for so large a number of families. The

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 273

names of the greater part are, as we should expect from the
earl's high position and connections, some of the best known
of the Norman nobility. No less than sixteen of them are
enumerated by Hollinshed in his list collected from the
Chronicles of Normandy, or from that rather suspicious
document, the Roll of Battle Abbey. Suspicious, not because
there is any idea that it is an invention, but because there is
good ground for suspecting that obliging curators of this
document have, from time to time, interpolated certain names
which, no doubt, in the opinion of their descendants, or perhaps
only casual holders, ought to have been there, but which, by
some mysterious accident, were omitted. This may be a libel
upon the Abbey of Battle, but it is a widely spread one. Those
names here given are Baskerville, Curzon, Camera, Curtenei,
Chaucis, Dive, Harcourt, Hastings, Luvitot, Montgomery,
Albini, Nieuton (Neville) fitz Otes, Tuberville, and Trussel, — a
complete chaplet of roses to the genealogist. One thing is
perfectly clear : Henry de Ferrars, whatever he may have done
in keeping English knights or sub-tenants in his own household
and family, so to speak, that is in his own demesne, allowed
but very few of them to be in his service as knights. He
seems to have made an exception in the cases of Swan, of
Cowley, Alric, of Church Somersal, and Cola, and Cole
(probably the same person), who held several manors under
him. But, with these exceptions, we cannot at present
positively identify any others of the names of the Domesday
tenants with those who enjoyed these manors in the time of
Edward the Confessor. True, twenty years had passed away —
nearly a generation, perhaps quite one in those days of con-
quest and plunder during the first twenty years of William's
reign, when many an English head was prematurely laid low.
It is (difficult positively to identify the tenants under Edward
the Confessor, but the Domesday scribe, no doubt instigated by
the Domesday Commissioner, the Earl himself, has given them
with more exactness than we generally obtain, and we are able
to identify amongst the tenants several Royal Princes. Siward
the Earl, Edwin, his brother, Earl Walleof, Godwin, Leuric,
and Levenot (younger Princes), and as we should expect from
such company, many great Danish names, so that it is
probable that there would be fewer changes in the tenancies

274 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

than at first sight appears ; but these questions will more
properly be discussed in the separate portions of the parochial
history. At present it is sufficient to call attention to the
jewels with which Domesday is thickly studded, and in no
part of England more richly than in this half county of Derby.
Evidently from the great beauty and charms of its situa-
tion, valuable for its mining facilities, enjoyable for its sport,
it was a favourite spot for Royalty, and would lose none
of its attractiveness in the hands of its princely lord, who,
perhaps not unlike some of his great successors, knew well
how to combine the pleasures and hospitalities, the true
charms of life, with a due regard to its duties and profits —
a good guarantee for a permanent settlement, and far more
admirable than the lavish splendour, with the inevitable
ignominy to follow, of the unhappy spendthrift

The old Earls of Derby were proud of their connection
with mining industries, and not only assumed the character
in their titles, but emblazoned, it upon their arms. The
horseshoes borne by these princes were no unmeaning insignia ;
it was an exposition of the fact that the shoeing of horses and
the winning and preparing the metal for the purpose was
their business. In that age of blood and iron, as in our
own, the man who could gather his wealth from the bowels
of the earth was not to be despised or trodden under
foot, and he held his own with the mightiest in the land,
a happy safeguard for peaceful industry and honourable
enterprise.

An alphabetical list of the tenants of Henry de Ferrars,
collected from Domesday, is already published at page 74 of
Section I. In this return they will be taken in the order given
by the Earl himself in his certificate. There is a very remark-
able feature in this return which gives it an exceptional and
great value. The Earl William has divided his return, not
according to the tenor of the King's writ, which directed him
simply to say which were of the old and which of the new
feoffment, but as before noticed he has divided his return into
no less than four divisions, the first and most valuable being
those knights with their precedessors who were enfeoffeed by
his great grandfather, who died in 1088, the next list those
who were enfeoffed by his grandfather, who died in 1 1 38, and

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. ' 27$

then those by his father, who was probably only just dead, and
who died in 1 162.

In these certificates unfortunately, though we get the full
name of the tenant, we do not learn the names of their fees,
whilst Domesday gives the contrary information, a good account
of the fee, but only as a rule the Christian names of the
tenants, and not always that, but the return of Henry Ferrars
supplies an account of the tenants at these different epochs,
and in some places giving a complete pedigree from Domes-
day, in the majority of cases taking us back within two years
of its date.

The few facts relating to the motive of these returns, which
are to be found in the Derbyshire portion of the book, are very
much condensed compared to those of some other counties,
but an examination of a considerable portion of the whole
returns has failed to produce any satisfactory evidence which
might determine their date and meaning. In no instance has
a full copy of the King's writ been discovered, but in several
there is a recital of it, which probably gives the best part of it,
notably is this the case in the return of Robert de Brinton, ot
Staffordshire. He writes to the King — ^!* I, Robert de Brinton,
myself, and others, my peers (comparibus meis), are directed by
your letter that by the fidelity and allegiance which we owe to
you our Lord by our letters under seal, we should show to you
what knights we have of the old feoffment of the time of the
King your grandfather, and what knights we have of the new
feoffment after the time of Henry your grandfather, and what
of our own demesne.*'

Herbert de Castell, in the County of Salop, began in the
same form. Scores of returns show that the King's order was
strictly to divide the returns of the knights into the two classes
of new and old feoffments, and these recitals place beyond all
doubt what was the King's definition of each of these classes.
Supplement this by the fact that throughout these returns
the reign of Stephen and his very name is ignored, although
an occasional reference is made to his period as the time of
war, and we obtain an important clue to guide us in the search.

In Cambridgeshire, Mannassah Damartin stated that he
held one fee in the time of King Henry, and that in the time of
the war he gave Walter de Gornac one quarter of it, which

276 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

William, his son, then held, and, he added, that of new feoffment
he had none. The mode by which the leturn is made is
significant John de Port, in Southampton, writes the King —
" Because on your part you have commanded that I should
certainly make you to know what of old and what of new
feoffment belongs to me (respicet) quoad yourself what and
which fees I hold. By this present writing I truly state."

Other Barons show that they made the enquiry by jury of
legal and honest men. The Bishop of Bath made his return
by his legal knights, and offered to give further information if
required. Earl Patric (Salisbury) made the return by his
honest and ancient men. Probably the universal method was
to obtain the return by such a jury, and the sole privilege which
was originally proposed to be given was, that the machinery of
the baronial court was not to be superseded by the king's
justices : a great advantage to the lord, since it carried with it
the power of selecting the jury.

The return for the Earl of Arundel's Sussex fee shows that it,
probably like the rest, was made upon oath. This was an excep-
tional case, for it would appear that this barony was then in the
king's hands; and it is recited that King Henry, on account of
certain contentions which arose between the knights of the Honour
of Arundel concerning service in the army of Wales, chose four
knights of the highest rank of the said Honour — Ranulf de
Sartil, Ralf fil Bruer, Will de Favarches, and Peter de Hatton,
and made them acknowledge the services of the Honour, and
therefore no one dare be heard against their legality and
oath.

Richard de Aquila declared that he had made no new
feoffment in Sussex since the reign of Henry I. John Count
of Ewe declared he had fifty-six fees of the feoffment of the
time of King Henry I., and no fees of new feoffment.

And this seemed the real point of the return, to show if
any feoffments had been made tempe Stephen, and by whom.

Walter de Med, in Kent, was probably caught, for he
returned to " Henry by the grace of God, King of the Angles.
May it be known to you that in the year and day in
which King Henry, your grandfather, was alive and dead,
Galf Talbot held twenty knights' fees of him, which, by your
favour, I now hold of you."

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 277

Walter fil Helte, in the same county, had to return that
he had only three knights' fees (no date of feoffment given ?)
but after the death of Henry the king, I gave one-fifth of a
fee of my own demesne to a certain one of my family. As
no consent of the king is mentioned, this was probably done in
the time of King Stephen.

Richard de Greenstead, in Wilts., answered that he had no
knights of the new or old feoffment, but for his demesne he
did the service of one knight to the king.

So William de London, in the same county, by his return
admitted that he ought to answer for his fee by the services
of his body.

In Somerset, Alexander de Alno declared that he had
enfeoffed no one since the death of Henry I., but that his
father had given to his brother Hugo, the knight, certain
lands, but this was in the time of King William.

In the same county Hugo de Curcel (the probable ancestor
of the Ducal House of Marlboro') stated that he held of the
king one knight's fee, and that his father gave one quarter of
it to Roger de Granton. This scion of the House of Churchill
was apparently, like some of the others, making an evasive
return, but this must not be rashly concluded, becailse if these
returns are of different dates, as it seems quite certain that
they are, only some of them were made on Henry's accession,
and after that period the di^inction of new and old feoffment
became of less importance, and might not be insisted upon or
noticed.

Wm. de Moun (Somerset) returned the knights enfeoffed
from the time of King Henry I. ; Wm. de Curci Dapifer those
which his grandfather, his father, and himself held, just as did
the Earl of Ferrars in his return ; so Humphrey de Bohun
gave the fees of which his grandfather was enfeoffed of the first
feoffment. These returns appear to have been made at a later
date than Henry's accession, as in fact we know to be the case
in the return of William de Ferrars, Earl of Derby, for he did
not obtain seizin in the sixth year of Henry the king, the year
his father died, for the lands were then in the king's hands, though
he certainly had seizin on the 14th of the king. Sometimes
two knights made a joint return, as in the case of Robert
Peverel and Norman de Normanville, who held one knight's

278 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

fee of the king in Sussex, Robert doing service for two parts,
Norman for the other.

The Bishop of Exeter returned under his writ sealed and
aptum : proof that these charters were made in the most solemn
and complete manner.

The returns made by those who divided the feoffments by
the epochs of their ancestors, would seem to indicate that their
certificates had been preserved, and were, in fact, being recited,
so that we seem to possess, in some instances in substance, the
very certificates of those ancestors ; and the later returns of
the Testa de Nevil proves that this system of making certificates
of knights' fees existed for centuries afterwards. It was
evidently therefore by some accident, such as that already
suggested, that they were collected and transcribed in this
book.

The following notes are taken almost haphazard from many
sources, which will be more regularly arranged hereafter. They
must be taken as merely tentative in some cases, and in none
as exhaustive. They are given to show the bent of the author's
mind, but it must be taken that they are all open to correction,
and many of them, doubtless, will be corrected hereafter. As
a rule, those families only whose histories are in doubt, are
at present noticed.

279

CHAPTER IV.

Zbc Certificate of tbe fiarl of ^errara*

No. I.— THE CHARTER OF WILLIAM, EARL DE

FERRARS (c. 1162).

Henry King of England, to his well-beloved baron William

Earl de Ferrars* health. We command you that

in the time of King Henry, our grandfather .*

I AND 2. — HENRY FIL SEWELL (SASWALDI)
HELD FIVE KNIGHTS' FEES, FULCHER, HIS
BROTHER, FOUR, AND NOW (1162) THE HEIRS
OF SASWALDI HOLD NINE FEES TOGETHER.

Note. — At Domesday Sasuallo held Hoge, Hatune, and
Etewall. Testa de N. : Sewell fii Henry h^ld Hoka (qy. Hoga).

This is a curious statement, from which it would seem that
both, or at any rate one, of these knights had died without
leaving issue, for the same heirs represented both, and from
the fact that the name of the heirs were unmentioned, it is
probable that they were co-parceners, and female heirs or their
descendants, and that as yet no partition had been made
between them, so that no one was as yet responsible for the
services due from the fees. Henry fil Sewalon was living at the
timp of the first Pipe Roll, for there he is entered as accounting

28o THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

for seven marcs of silver that he might be quit, />., released
from his oath.

This is a most interesting pedigree, and several families claim
descent, but it is to be feared that their claims will not stand
the brunt of investigation, for their only proof seems to be that
their ancestors bore the names of some of the manors held by
Saswalo, which is simply idle. The family of Shirley especially
seem at fault with their proof, and they do not even possess
the advantage of possessing any of Sewel's manors. The
heralds differ amongst themselves as to the history of the Shirley
family. When this is the case, it is almost more dangerous
than when they are in agreement, though that is bad
enough. But if they differ, it is tolerably certain that one
of the body has gone wrong somewhere, and very wrong too,
if his fellows will not support him. That the family of Sewell
were the chief tenants of the Earl de Ferrars in the reign of
Stephen or Henry II., is clear from a charter of Robert,
grandson of Henry Ferrars, concerning Leke, in which Hugh
fil Sewell is the chief witness, and Henry fil Sewal also attested
it (1138-62). Some authorities state that Henry and Fulcher
had three other brethren, and, if this can be shown positively,
there may be hope of proving the pedigree.

The surname of Sewell remained long in Derbyshire. It is
to be found in a list of knights' fees of 10 Henry VI., when
John Sewale held land in Wirksworth ; and the name of Swale
is to be found in Hardwick charters of the same period. So,
too, at an earlier period it appears in some Osberton charters.
Domesday only indicates three of the manors held by this
family, and it may be difficult to recover the rest. They then
held Hoon, Hatton, and Etwall.

■

Sewell fil Fulcher (who may or may not be of the same
family : both Fulc and Sewell are common Christian names),
gave Aldwark to Derley Abbey, a manor which was Ferrars-',
but was probably appurtinent to Bradburn, held by de ^Cauz.
He is mentioned in a Pipe Roll of 21 Henry II. A Henry
fil Fulcher is mentioned in the same Pipe Roll, and in 15
Henry II.; and a Rxjbert fitz Fulc in 26 Henry II. In 7 John,
Henry fil Sewall sued Sarra de Hedesferes and William de
London. Sewall fitz Henry; 1202, fined, with \Villiam de
Stretton concerning one bovate of land in Barlborough^ and

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

281

the descendants of a collateral branch of this family may be
traced long afterwards.

This brings down the family to the period when territorial
surnames were adopted, and it is to be hoped that such a ..
transmutation of names may be discovered.

It is difficult to determine the nationality of the sons of
Saswald, or Saswalo, from the name. Henry and Fulc are
both Norman names, but they were so commonly Norse, that
they were plentiful wherever the Danes settled ; and these
names may have been given in gratitude to the Earl de Ferrars
for placing this knight in so high a position as chief tenant of
the Honour. The strong probability is, that he was a relation
of his lord, possibly a son4n-law, or grandson, as was the case
with the next tenant

3.— WILLIAM FIL NIGEL HELD FOUR KNIGHTS*
FEES; NOW ROBERT, HIS SON, HOLDS THEM.

Note. — There is no doubt about one at least of the manors
(Catton) held by this knight, nor any about his indentity, for
Domesday records that he held Catton (Chetune), and the
Baron St Amand obtained it as one of the co-heirs of Robert
fil Nigel, Lord of Cainhoe.*

The Abingdon cartulary shows that in 1 107 Henry Albini
of Cainhoe, whose mother was Amicia, daughter of Henry de
Ferrars, had a younger brother, William. There is probably
some error in the generally received pedigree of the Albinis of
Cainhoe, for it has to be explained how the older branch of the
family came to inherit this, if William fil Nigel was the younger
brother of Henry, for it is generally recorded that Robert was
his eldest son, and that he was followed by another Robert,
whose co-heir Ailmer St Araand married, and the difficulty is
the greater that a family of Albini remained in Derby for
centuries after this datp, who held Abney of the Ferrars
family. One of this family attested Robert de Ferrars' charter,
1 138 62, concerning Leke. Robert fitz Nigel was one of Henry
de Ferrars' Staffordshire knights. The proof that the names
Abney and Albini are identical is simply overwhelming, and
in^upnuch as this name was well known at Domesday, it seems

20

v^/t.

X'd^/rKpf

\

282 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

impossible that the manor of Abney can be identified with
Habenai of Domesday, as both Lysons and Glover insist.
Swain held it at Domesday under William Peverel, under whom
it is not recorded that the Albinis held land. They held
Uffington, in South Wingfield, and Pentric under Ralf fitz
Hubert, but that was to be expected, seeing the close connec-
tion of their families. For a full account of the Albinis the
learned reader is referred to the author's history of the House
of Arundel. The Abneys of Willesley now undoubtedly
represent the Derbyshire branch of this great family, who are
of the male blood of the family of the ducal house of
Normandy, the Lord of St Sauveur, the ancestor of the Albinis,
Earls of Arundel (and the Lords of Cainhoe and Belvoir), being
the next heir male to the duchy upon the death of Duke
Robert in 1035. The Duke of Norfolk now represents the
Earls of Arundel.

A William fil Nigel held Caldwell, of Burton Abbey, at a
very early period. Dr. Cox suggests that he was de Gresley.
This may be so, but at this period the Gresleys were not
certainly tenants of the Ferrars' family. It is clear that they
were knights of the Honour of Peverel, and would not become
knights of this honour until, in the turbulent period of King
John's reign (if any particular portion of it can be so styled),
William de Ferrars intruded into the Peverel inheritance.

In 23 Henry II., Robert de Albini rendered composition of
five marcs for the duel of the Earl de Ferrars ; that is, he was
one of his sureties ; and then headed the list of his knights
(see page 121, where the names of a number of the earl's
tenants of that date are to be found.)

4.— RICHARD DE CURZON HELD FOUR KNIGHTS'
FEES ; ROBERT, HIS SON, NOW HOLDS THEM.

Gilbert held Chelardestune at Domesday.

Note. — Robert de Curzon held Ketelston for half a knight's
fiie and one fee in Twyford, and Thomas de Curzon held four
parts of a knight's fee, in Ketleston. Test de Nev.

The very greatest interest attaches to this pedigree. In point
of antiquity, coupled with the uniform high position held by

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 283

■

tlie family through all generations from the time of the Con-
quest, it is almost the premier pedigree of the county.

Genealogists have meddled with this pedigree only to mar
it, and that which has been detailed by the heralds in their
visitations abounds with errors, but nothing can destroy its
absolute integrity as an undoubted Domesday pedigree, the
family having always enjoyed the same manors from father
to son to the present time. The heralds persist in deriving
the family from Roger, who held Croxall at Domesday,
alleging that the Croxall branch is the elder. This, however,
appears extremely doubtful, for that manor clearly came into
the family by the marriage of Rich de Curzon with Petronilla,
the daughter and heiress (or co-heir) of Walter de Camville,
who was probably the descendant of Roger of Domesday.
There are two manors which the Curzons possess, of the
origin of which (out of all their manors) we have no account.
These are Kedleston and Weston Underwood. It is tolerably
clear that they formed the whole or part of the lesser barony
of Richard de Curzon at the time when he married the heiress
of Camville, and at Domesday, both of them were held by
one ^juilbert, who, in all probability, was the true ancestor of
the family. A Curzon held these estates in 1088 ; only two
years previously Guilbert held them, therefore it may be con-
tended he was the common ancestor of the family. It is to
be hoped, however, as before observed, that further research
will make this quite clear.

The certificate of the Earl de Ferrars places the presumption
of a descent from the Domesday lord infinitely higher than
that which can generally be drawn froip these documents, since
it reduces the ordinary space of seventy- five years to two, in
fact, to so high a probability that it is almost a certainty.

23 Henry II. Robert de Curzon rendered composition of
40s. on account of the duel of the earl.

5._WALTER DE MONTGOMERY HELD FOUR

KNIGHTS' FEES.

Note. — Testa de Nevil, Wm. de Montgomery held Marston
and Cubberley for three fees and one-tenth and one-thirteenth.
The Book of Aids shows that this family then held land in

284 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

Marchington, Cuberley, Sudbury, Aston, Snelleston, Eyton,
Sedgeshall, Orlaston, and Sonsal. This is, again, one of the
grandest pedigrees in Derbyshire; but, unlike the family of
Curzon, they no longer remain (at least under that name) in
this county. The representation of the family is presumably
with the families of Stanhope, the elder co-heir, and the only
one who left issue ultimately surviving, having married Sir
John Port, of Etwall, whose daughter and heiress, Margaret,
married Sir Thomas Stanhope, of Shelford, ancestor of the
Earls of Chesterfield, the Earls of Harrington, and the Earls
of Stanhope. It is difficult, however, to state positively who
is now the true representative of the family, so many of the
Earls of Chesterfield having died without issue, or leaving
only female issue, the first of whom, in point of seniority,
being of course the true representative of the Montgomerys.

The Vernons of Sudbury, although they possess several of the
manors of the Montgomerys, have in fact no descent from them.
Sir John Vernon of Haddon married one of the co-heirs of Sir
John Montgomery in the reign of Henry VUL, but his issue
ultimately became extinct, and his estates passed under his will
to the issue of an elder brother of Sir John Vernon, from
whom the present Lord Vernon descends. Although there
cannot be a doubt that the Montgomerys were Domesday
tenants of the Ferrars, yet just as in the case with the Curzons,
the Domesday ancestor is uncertain. The probabilities seem
to lie between Ralf and John, the latter of whom is generally
supposed to be the true ancestor. This interesting question
must await solution until the history of the several manors held
by this family have been more carefully enquired into. The
arms of this family would seem to indicate a descent from the
family of Albini, since it is a derivative coat of that of Ivri or
Evroux, which Wm. Albini, Earl of Arundel, of this house, bore
prior to the acquisition of that earldom.

One of the Domesday tenants of the Ferrars called John was
probably de Harcourt, who subsequently changed his name to
that of Heris. He was nearly related to Roger Montgomery,
being descended from Herfast, the brother of the Duchess
Gunnor, amongst whose descendants we find Earl Roger de
Montgomery. Amongst his knights there was a Ralf de
Montgom'ery, who was possibly the Lord of Snelston and

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 285

Cubley. Certainly the latter place was a part of the barony of
this family. For a full account of the family of Montgomery,
the author must refer the reader to his history of the House of
Arundel.

Walter de Montgomery attested a charter to Alan de Leke,
nephew of Elfnot, concerning that manor 1138-62.

117s Walter Montgomery paid 40s. on account of the earl's
duel.

6.— ROBERT DE BAKEPUZ HELD FOUR KNIGHTS'

FEES.

Note. — Testa de Nevil proves that Galfry de Bakepuz held
Alkmanton for 3 parts of i knight's fee, and that John de
Bakepuz held Barton for i fee. Both these manors were held
at Domesday by Ralf, doubtless their ancestor. In all proba-
biiity the Earl de Ferrars had more than one knight named
Ralf. The Book of Aids shows that John de Bakepuz then
held 3 parts of a fee in Alkmanton and Barton, formerly
held by Robert Bakepuz.

This family were long resident in the county of Derby,
certainly much later than the reign of Edward I., which date
Lysons gives for the termination of their residence.

In the time of Earl Henry, ante 1088, they held more manors,
but their descendants were resident in some of these as late, and
probably later, than the reign of King Henry VI., although
doubtless their chief property had passed to the Blounts.

Besides the high position they bore amongst the lesser barons
of the chief barony, their coat armour suggests a family
relationship, for, in addition to the ancient arms of Ivri, which
they probably obtained from the Albinis, they bore the three
horse-shoes of their chief, which they would not assume unless
there was affinity of blood as well as a feudal relationship.

1138-62. Geoffry de Bakepuz attested a charter of Earl
Robert de Ferrars.

Henry II. Walter de Bakepuz attested the charter of
Welbeck Abbey.

1 167. Walter and John de Bakepuz were sureties for their
lord.

286 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

1 197. Robert de Bakepuz fined with the Abbot of Derley
and the Knights' Hospitallers concerning the church of Barew.

1235. Walter de Bakepuz and Elizabeth, his wife, at Blythe.

33 Henry HI. GeofTry de Bakepuz and Eincynea, his wife,
held land in Nettlesworth by knight service of Malvesinus de
Herecy and Theophania, his wife, and they of the Honour of
Tickhill. This estate eventually came to the family of Denman,
ancestors of the Lords Denman, in descent from Herecys.

Sir Galf de Bakepuz and Amicia, his wife, granted land to
Lenton Priory (Register 137;.

C. Edward I. Ralf de Bakepuz (Subsidy Roll).

20 Edward HI. John fil John de Bakepuz (Book of Aids).

25-33 Edward HI. Thomas Bakepuz (Subsidy Roll).

6 Henry VI. James Bakepuz of Alkmanton, and John of
Barton (Subsidy Rolls).

10 Henry VI. Wm. Bakepuz, of London, held land in
Derbyshire.

7.— BASKERVILLE, HENRY DE, AND THEN JOHN,
HIS SON, HELD THREE KNIGHTS* FEES.

Note. — This name seems to be another form of that of
Boscherville.

1266. Sir John Baskerville obtained a grant of Old Whitting-
ton, in Cheshire, from Robert de Camville.

8.— ROBERT FIL WALKELIN, AND NOW ROBERT,
HIS SON, HELD TWO KNIGHTS' FEES.

Note. — There is but little doubt that in this knight we have a
relation of the earl in the male line, the surname fitz Walkelin
being that by which many of his family were known. In the face
of the fact that the pedigree of Ferrars has never been satis-
factorily worked out, it is dangerous to speculate as to the exact
relationship, but, seeing that we obtain here three generations,
the probability is that Robert fitz Walkelin, who was enfeoffed
by Henry de Ferrars ante 1088, was his brother.

Robert, uncle of the earl, who was surety for him in 117S, ^^^
probably this tenant. The word avunculus, by which the

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 287

relationship is described, is a very loose one, and is wide
enough to inchide the descendants of the uncles and aunts of a
person on either side, though at one time it is supposed to have
included only those relations by the mother's side, — in fact it has
little less meaning than the word kinsman, or cousin.

The Burton Cartulary shows that in 1150-59 Abbot Robert
granted to Robert fil Robert fil Walkelin (no doubt this knight)
certain land in Heanor, to be held of the Abbey at the nominal
rent of half a mark. Gaufridus Abbot (11 14-50) having granted
to him other land in Oure at 5s. rent. The same abbot granted to
Robert de Ferrars, at a rent of 5s., certain land in Tickenhall,
which his father had previously held, for which he was bound to
protect the Abbey.

Dr. Cox appears to identify these two knights.

The account of the fitz Walkelins will occupy much space in
the Parochial History.

9.— ROBERT DE DUNE. AND THEN JAMES, HIS
SON, HELD TWO KNIGHTS' FEES.

Note. — Testa de Nevil shows that Robert de Dun held 2
fees in Breydeston.

It is probable that these fees lay in Brcadsal and Dalbury.
Robert de Dun was Lord of Dalbury tempe Henry II. (Dug-
dale's Monasticon i, 355, first edition.)

At Domesday Dalbury is described as a hamlet of Mickleover,
which was then belonging to the Abbot of Burton.

This family remained in the service of the Earls de Ferrars
for several generations. The manor of Breadsal, which they
held, came to the Curzons through the marriage of an heiress,
but the younger branches of the family long remained in the
county.

In 31 Henry III. (Rolls called Tower Records, but properly
forming part of the Coram Rege and Assize Rolls) there was an
assize to enquire whether Sampson le Dun and Galf de Skefing-
ton had disseized Robert de Ferrars (meaning the earl) of 15
tofts, 2 carucates, and 24 bovates, 2 mills and 4 acres of wood,
and IS. and one pound pepper rent in Breadsal, which he
claimed to hold of the feoffment of Jacobus de Audeley.

288 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

Sampson said that the earl commanded him that he should
send to him his palfry, which was a fine one, and when he was
unwilling to send it the earl sent his knights to the town of
Breadsal, who, by the writ of the same earl, seized it and took it
to a certain hermitage, and the same earl held it in hand for a
long time, and afterwards gave it to Robert de Stradley, who
gave it to Hugo de Dan, with Nicolas de Marnham, the earl's
senescal.

The earl asserted that Sampson had subsequently surrendered
to him.

The same year (same Roll) Wm. de Sauneby and Sibella, his
wife, widow of Robert de Dun, sued Henry de Dun for a certain
rent from Breadsal, and Sampson de Dun for another rent, who
called Margaret, fil and heir of Roger fil Robert de Dun, to
warranty, who was an infant within age in the custody of Hugo
de Meynil.

The Duns remained many generations as landed proprietors
in this county.

10.— RALF PARVUS HELD TWO KNIGHTS' FEES
WHICH REGINALD DE GRESLEY THEN HELD.

Testa de Nevil shows that Wm. de Gresley and Gilbert de
Seagrave held three parts of one fee in Linton.. The connection
between this de Gresley and the family of Drakelow has not
yet been discovered. It was not until about the year 1200
that the latter family became knights of the Earl of Ferrars ;
but in 1 178, Robert and Henry de Gresley, no doubt of this
family, were sureties for the earl.

The Liber Niger shows that Robert de Gresley held three
fees in Staffordshire of Robert de Stafford, which at Domesday
were held by Nigel, and it is assumed, perhaps, without suffi-
cient proof, that he was the direct ancestor.

Kirkby's Quest shows that Galf de Gresley held three fees in
the reign of Edward I., and the Book of Aids (20 Edward IV.)
that one fee in Lothington had descended to John, his son.

The Gresley pedigree, like so many others, has been built
up upon assumptions, the truth of which it will be attempted
hereafter to test.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQQER. 289

II.— ROBERT DE LUVITOT, AND THEN WILLIAM
PANTOUL, HELD TWO FEES FOR THE SERVICE

OF ONE KNIGHT.

Wm. Earl Ferrars by charter now at Hardwick Hall, granted
and confirmed to Maurice, nephew (nepos) of Robert de
Luvitot, the manor of Wodham, which Robert Earl Ferrars,
his father gave to him to hold in inheritance in exchange for
his uncle's lands given .to Wm. Pantoul.

General Wrottesley has assumed the meaning of returns in
this form to be, that the tenant last named is the under-tenant
of the former, but this charter seems to solve the difficulty, for
here, at any rate, there was no undertenancy, but a simple
exchange. The difficulty is to understand the difference of an
old feoffment of this kind, and a new grant or feoffment.
Perhaps it is that the new tenant, by arrangement, succeeds to
the whole obligations and duties of the old one, as heir.

This grant was made by the earl in his court before himself,
his barons and knights, a grand list, which is of great value,
since so little is recorded of this barony.

They were Richard, Abbot of St Peter's, sur Dive Fulc,
Prior of Tutbury, Roger Chaplain of the Earl H. fil Fulc
(Sewall), and H. Dankerville, Will Cap. Maurice and Anst.
clerics, William de Ferr and Hugo, brothers of the Earl, Robert
and H. his uncles ; William Pantoul, Robert de Piri (Dapifer),
Robert fil Walkelin, and H. his brother, and Peter and Walter
de Montgomery, and Ralf his son, and Rad de Montgomery,
and William fitz Herbert, and Walter de Somerville, and Adam
de Stanton, and William his brother, and Humphrey de Tolka
Rad de Boscerville and Renald de G(ou)sel, Harald de Lek
and Alan his son, Thomas Venator of the Earl, and Robert de
C(ur)cun, and Rad de M(u)st(ers). H. de Cavis, and William
de Dun, and Robert fil Ralf, and Peter de Sandiacre, and
William de Munjoia, Robt Pincerna and Thos. de Piri,
Galf de Camara and John de Boscervill, G. de Bak, Rann
de Manville and German his brother, John de Bak, Wido de
Rochford, Richard fil Alan and Reginald de Danesia, Laurence
and Ralf de Torp, and Gaufry and Gilbert his sons, H. fil Robert
de Lega, Robert fil Richard de Normanton, Wm. de Coddinc,

290 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

and Robert and Ralf his brothers, and Wm. fil Alcher and G.
his son, Richard fitz Herbert, and Alan fitz John, and Roger
Galum.

12.— HENRY DE CAMBRIES HELD ONE KNIGHTS

FEE.

Note. — Testa de Nevil shows that Henry de Chaumbreys
held half a fee in Brunaveston. The manors of Barocote
and Burnaston were held by Roger fil Walter de Cambrics
in 1290, and it seems that they were the manors held by
this knight, in 1088, one Henry, who is presumably the same,
holding them at Domesday, and of the same knight, also
Norbury, If this be so, it would seem doubtful if he were
not another member of the Ferrars' family, for Robert fil
Henry de Ferrars gave Norbury to Tutbury early in the reign
of Henry I., and the Prior, in 1126, gave it to William fitz
Herbert, probably identical with his nephew of that name, in
fee farm at iocs. rent. He was ancestor of the family of
Fitzherbert of Tissington.

,3._WILLIAM DE SEYLE, AND THEN RALF, HIS
SON, HELD TWO KNIGHTS' FEES.

Note. — Lysons gives no account of this knight, but it would
seem, from the Burton Cartulary, that Ralf, the son, was
constable of the Earl Robert (fo. 33).

28th November, 1208, a Lucian de Seille, and Agatha his
wife, fined, with Bertram de Caldun, and Alice his wife, con-
cerning a wood in Herteshorn, called Danewellhai. Amicia
de Albini sued Lucian fil Robert de Seille for land there, to
which he had ingress only through Lucian his grandfather.
Lucian, the grandson, called to warranty John fitz Herbert, who
could not come, because he was in the king's service abroad,
and, in fact, a prisoner of the King of France in the castle of
Baalan.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 29I

14— GALF DE CAMARA HELD TWO FEES, OF
WHICH ROBERT FIL RALF AND PETER DE
GOLDINGTON THEN EACH HELD ONE.

Note — This again raises the difficulty mooted by General
Wrottesly, and this is complicated by a similar entry being
found in the Staffordshire account (which the General has
published, though without notice of this entry). There Geoffry
de Camara held 2 fees of Henry de Ferrars, which the General
identifies as in Marchinton, which the same two knights then
held.

If their estates were held officially, or rather for official
services connected with the county, it would almost seem as if
this Robert fil Ranulf was the sheriff, and Peter de Goldington
his under-sheriff, for both held certain offices in connection with
the treasury of the county, as is evinced by many entries in the
Pipe Rolls, from the i ith to the 14th year of Henry II.

IS.— YVO DE HARECOURT AND WILLIAM FID
WALKELIN HELD THREE KNIGHTS' FEES,
WHICH THE HEIRS OF GALFR MARMION
THEN HELD.

Note. — This is a very puzzling entry, and it is difficult to
understand how two men, being owners of the same knight's fees
near Domesday, except by sale, could pass their interest by
descent to the same man, unless at the first period they repre-
sented co-heirs, and one of them died without issue. In the year
1 100 or 1 102, Robert de Heriz held Edensor, probably of Henry
de Ferrars, for it was his at Domesday ; and he held Oxcroft of
William Peverel, for he made grants out of both of them to his
foundation at Lenton about that date. We have no history
of Oxcroft from Lysons. He merely mentions that Heriz
held it tempe Henry III., and in his account of Edensor he
does not refer to the Heriz family. Now Robert held this
latter place, as well as Wingfield, at Domesday; and he is
presumably the Robert de Heriz of fifteen years later. He
left a son, Ivo, it is very certain, for he appears from the first
Roll of the Pipe to have been sheriff, or perhaps farmer, of
the county at some earlier period, and he then accounts for a

292 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

payment for his land at Wilgeby, where, at Domesday, William
Peverel held two bovates and a half of Clifton Sole, and which,
very clearly, Robert de Heriz held in the latter part of the
reign of King Henry II. In 26 Henry II., Adeliza, the widow
of William de Heriz, the elder brother of Robert (whose heir
he was), fined with the king that she should not be compelled
to marry. In the reign of Henry III., Ivo de Heriz, son of
Robert, held Oxcroft, Wyngfield, and Lyvechief, for two
knights' fees. If this family are identical with that of Yvo,
the knight of 1088, it is clear that they must descend from a
younger branch of it. Of this William fil Walkelin, nothing
seems to be known. Possibly he was another brother of Henry
de Ferrars, and he probably died without heirs ; though how
the heirs of Galfry de Marmion succeeded to the inheritance,
whether by descent or purchase, is unknown. Nor is it clear
who these heirs were. One of them was probably Albreda,
the wife of William de Camville, of Clifton Childcot, in
Staffordshire, who 9 John sued William de Berkley concerning
Childcot in Derbyshire, which was soc to it

There is a very puzzling account of a fitz Walkelin family,
of Derby, which possibly may be the same. In the reign of
Henry II., Walkelin of Derby, and Goda his wife, were dealing
with certain rights in a mill at Derby, which he had purchased
of William de Heriz. Was this William that son of Ivo de
Heriz who died 23rd Henry II.? Magister Robert fil Goda,
who died ante 1176, granted a messuage, with a bakery
(cum furno\ which Wachelin held in Derby, and the land,
which Petronilla fil Peter (his father) gave to the Canons of
Derley. It would seem that he had several younger brothers,
called Wachiline, Henry, Augustine, Peter, William, and Walter.
Most of them Ferrars names, and curiously a Wachiline de
Ferrars, an uncle of William the Earl, married, presumably in
the time of Stephen or of Henry I., one Goda, the daughter
of Robert Todeni, with whom it seems tempting to identify
this couple. But the Ferrars' pedigree is in such an uncertain
state as to dates, and they have adhered so frequently to the
same Christian names, that it is by no means safe to trust to
the printed accounts.

16.— RICHARD DE FIFEHED HELD TWO FEES.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 293

I7._WM. DE BOSKERVILLE HELD 3 KNIGHTS'
FEES, OF WHICH RALF HIS SON HELD ONE,
ODO FITZ JOHN HELD ANOTHER, AND ROBERT
(II.), EARL DE FERRARS (1162), GAVE THE
THIRD TO THE KNIGHT TEMPLARS.

Note. — Robert de Boskerville held Eisse, Hiltune, and
Turvedestun at Domesday.

The question arises who was this William de Boskerville, and
Derbyshire historians give no answer to it We must in this
case go direct to Norman records for an answer, and we at
once see that Boscheville in Normandy, or part of it, ws^s the
territory of the Avenel family, another great Derbysliire family
of whom as little is known. Now nothing is clearer than that
the Avenel family held Haddon at a very early period, for the
foundation charter of Lenton, c iioi, was attested by Avenel
of Haddon, and he granted land out of Haddon, M ethod-we-ploth,
and Maniax to that foundation; and Wm. Avenel, who in all pro-
bability was this Wm. de Boskerville, attested a somewhat later
charter of the son of the founder (after 1 1 1 3).

Robert de Avenel attested the foundation charter of Welbec
in the time of Stephen, and Ralf de Avenel, early in King
Henry II.'s reign, gave the church of Sutton to the Prior of
Trentham. (Madox Form, Ang., No. 4. 507.)

1175. Ralf de Boscherville was surety half a mark on
account of the Earl's duel.

We obtain no trace of Wm. Avenel in Domesday, but we
learn that at Domesday Haddon was part of the ancient
demesne of the Crown, as was Oneis, another of Wm. Avenel's
manors, except one carucate in Haddon which Henry de Ferrars
claimed- against the king. These Berewites, with others,
belonged to Bake well, where there was a lead work, which with
the king's other mining districts were now in the hands of the
Baron's Fossiers, and long held by them, till the favoured
family of the Gernons, the alleged ancestors of the Dukes of
Devonshire, possessed it Certainly we gain from this no direct
evidence of a holding under Henry de Ferrars. We must look,
therefore, to see if any evidence is procurable from other records,
and fortunately we shall obtain from the partition of his estates

294 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

in the time of King Richard an account of the fees which were
then held by the family, and which were divided between the
co-heirs, Simon Basset and Helizabeth his wife, and Richard
Vernon and Amicia his wife.

. The Rotuli Curiae Regis, No. S, which was formerly dated
by the authorities of the Record Office as that of the second
year of King John, but upon the redating, which was made in
consequence of the author s strictures (written in several articles
of the " Law Review " of 1875), is now dated 6 Richard I. Now,
beside the fact that some of the Rolls of this bundle are of the
date of King Henry III., this date can hardly be correct,
since the Pipe Roll of that year shows that . . . Basset paid
100 shillings for half the farm of Bassellaw. A Richard de
Vernon farmed the other half, and the same roll shows that at
the same date Hugh de Haddon (who was probably a Basset)
paid jCio for having his land, which was a knight's fee, in
Haddon. (We must remember that there are two Haddon.s.)
More than this, the Sheriff accounts for 12s., the value of the
goods sold this year, late of Robert de Avenel, " one of the
king's enemies," from which fact it is easy to read that Robert
de Avenel had for some reason forfeited his lands, and that
they were in the king's hands, yet his co-heirs were practically
allowed to enjoy them, paying a rent, or farming them from the
Crown. The meaning of this can probably be ascertained from
a charter now at Belvoir Castle (where many valuable Vernon
papers are deposited by reason of the representation of the
Dukes of Rutland of this branch of the Vernon family.) The
charter is of William Avenel, and it concedes to Richard Vernon
and Simon Basset, who had married his two daughters and co-
heirs, all his estate in free marriage.

The partition, of whatever date it is, shows that Simon Basset
obtained the whole vill of Haddon and half of Basselaw, whilst
Richard de Vernon obtained Hadstock, Hurlingburc, and half
of Basselaw.

The Croxton Chartulary, also at Belvoir, shows that Gilbert
Avenel was a benefactor granting land in Empton. This
Gilbert was clearly in the direct Haddon line.

The Pipe Rolls for Notts, and Derby give some evidence.

2 Henry H. Gervase Avenel paid 20 marks for the land
of Basselaw.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 295

19 Henry II. Gervase and Robert Avertel were two of the
overseers respecting works done to the Castles of Bolsover and
Peck.

Robert again in 20 Henry II., Gervase in 23 Henry II.

In 26 Henry II., the sheriff accounted for 68s. for corn sold
off the land of Gervase Avenel of the Honour of Peverel,
proof that he had forfeited his lands, unless they were for
other reason, perhaps, a minority, then in the king's hands.

In 7 Richard I., Wm. Basset was charged 40 marcs for land
in Nottingham and Derby, and Robert Avenel one marc for
seven shillings rent in Pleslie and in Sutton.

In 3 John, Wm. Avenel paid 4 marcs for having writ to
recover one fee in Basselaw, Bubbeshill, Cardeburc, and Froggat,
against Simon Basset, and Richard de Vernon and Alice his
wife. Unfortunately, we can find no trace of this suit in the
Rot. Cur. Regis, so that the real reason of the disappearance
of the Avenels is not clear.

In 6 Richard I., Amicia ux Gilbert Avenel placed her hus-
band against Mathew fil Odo (qy. Ivo) de Eston p Thomas
fitz Ralf, for her dower in the vills of Normanton and Eston,
held by her former husband, John de Eston, but Mathew said
it was his mother's inheritance (who was one of eight co-heirs),
and his father could not endow his second wife out of it

As to Basselaw, this, again, was one of the kings manors,
and we learn nothing from Domesday, and it is the same with
Froggat, ^which was part of this manor, and also with respect
to Bubbeshill. Cardeburc is not traceable at present.

With regard to grants out of these properties, we find that
Wm. de Avenei, Lord of Haddon, gave One Ash to Roche
Abbey; this again, if Lysons has rightly identified it, was in
the king's hands at Domesday, but possibly this was Ash in
Sutton-on-the-Hill. We also find that he gave Conkesbury to
the Abbot of Leicester, and here we find a true Ferrars con-
nection, for this place is in Youlgrave, one of Henry de Ferrars*
Domesday manors.

But perhaps the clearest evidence is to be extracted (almost
dragged) from the history of Sutton-on-the-Hill. This was
held by Henry de Ferrars at Domesday, and it contained Ash,
Osleston, and Thurveston.

Ralf de Boscheville (probably the Ralf of the Red Book)

296 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

gave the church of Sutton to Tutbury, and John gave half
the tithes of Osleston and Nether Thurvaston to Tutbury.
He was probably the father of Odo, who held one of Wm.
de Boschevilles knight's fees tempt Henry II.

Reginald Bassett attested a RufTord charter of Gerard de
Furnival c John.

English records failing to supply evidence, we must turn to
Norman, and here we quickly discover a close connection
between the Ferrars family in England and that of Avenel
in Normandy. Perhaps the Avenels ranked even higher than
the families of the Barons Fossiers, for just as in England
the Ferrars granted manors to the Avenels, in Normandy
the Avenels were lords of the Ferrars.

The author must refer the learned reader for an account
of the Avenels to his history of the House of Arundel. In
that work he has endeavoured to identify them with the great
family of Picot de Say, and a direct connection between the
Avenels and the Ferrars family is established by the marriage
of Roger Albini, the King's Pincerna, and Wm. de Say, with
two of the sisters of Hugh de Grent Mesnil, this Roger
d'lvri being brother of Nigel Albini, who married the sister
of Wacheline de Ferrars. The chief seat of this family was
at the Bois Avenel, in Landelles, near Biarz, in La Manche.

The Says or Avenels were knights of Roger Montgomery,
and by him settled in Shropshire and various places in England
about the time of the Conquest. The Chronique de Normandy
names amongst the companions of the Conqueror, the Sire de
Biars, and "Avenel de Biars."

The Chartulary of Marmontier (Bibl. Natl, de France) gives
a grant, dated 1037, of the Church of St. Martin's de Belisme,
by Hughes, son of John de Roceto, which was attested by
Henry de Biars, his kinsman, who was ultimately his heir in
1067.

Sigembert de Biars and Ormenellus, surnamed Avenellus,
gave a third of his rights in the same church to the same
Abbey (Gal Christ. XL, part 153). (It will be remembered
that the first Avenel of Haddon who attests Lenton Chartulary,
2 Henry I., only signs with a surname, a practice only in vogue
at that period amongst very high personages.)

William Avenel, of Biars, 1082, gave the Church of Vezens

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 297

and the Priory of Biarz to the Abbey of La Couture, in the
Diocese of Mans, Ralf, his brother, and Rainold (Ralf), his son,
confirming the gift This Williann Avenel had sons named
William, Richard, Robert, and Hugh.

The Chart ulary of Lessay, at St. Lo, records a grant of
Richard Avenel, brother of William, confirmed 1 126 by Henry I.
Ralf and William Avenel both attested the charter of Wm.
de Campo Ernulphi to the Abbey of Marmoutier, about 1088.

The Chartulary of Savigni (fol. 80, Cartulaire de Normandy —
Rouen Lib!.) proves distinctly that Wm. de Ferrars was a
knight of Robert de AveneFs in Normandy, for he gave the
land of Broilli D'oet with his consent to that foundation. The
date of this charter is c Henry 11. Robert Earl Ferrars had
made a grant of land in Northamptonshire to the same Abbey
just previously.

Oliver fil Alain and Mary his wife, gave half the mill of
Pasbray to the same foundation, with the consent of Ranulf de
Avenel.

c 1 1 58. Wm. Avenel Siegneur de Biarrs mentions his three
sons, Roland, Nicolas, and Oliver. Roland married Havis de
Parigni. Oliver, who died in 1228, married Petronille de la
Cheze, leaving Oliver his son.

The Chartulary of Mont St. Michael contains many entries
relating to the family. About 1080, Ranulf Avenel and Hervey
Avenel attested the charter of Robert Earl of Mortain, and he
gave the Church of Sartilly to that foundation, which Ranulf,
his son, confirmed about 1105. In 1 121, William Avenel was
scnescal of the earl. That this is the same family appears most
probable, from a grant of Ranulf Avenel of certain services in
the vill of Coutance, the Honour of the St. Sauveur (Albini
family), about 1 100.

Ralf Avenel was a witness to a charter granted to the Priory
of Mortain, A.D. 1082.

But the most pertinent fact to this enquiry is that Emma de

Vernon, daughter of Baldwin Brionis, Earl of Devon (also called

Baldwin de Insula), married William Avenel. Matilde, the

daughter of Ralf Avenel (her son), married successively Robert,

natural son of King Henry I., and Robert of Averanches, whose

daughter and heir married Rainald de Courtney, and so founded

that family in the West of England. The great importance of
21

298 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

this connection exists in the great probability that the Vemons
of Haddon were of the family of the Earls of Devon, and not
of that of the Vernons of Chester, upon whom the heralds have
affiliated them.

Now let us turn to the evidence of the Cartulary of the Abbey
of Monteburg (the public library of Paris).

First at fol. 8 we find Richard Avenel granting the mill of
Otelin to that foundation ; to a charter of William de Vernon,
granting land in the territory of the Albinis at St Sauveur
(Neelhuma), William Avenel and Richard, his sons, were
witnesses. This is very important, as it emphasises the idea of
the origin of Richard de Vernon, who married the daughter
of William de Avenel of Haddon, showing that this William de
Vernon actually had a son Richard at this period.

At fol. Id we find a charter of Roger de Magnaville, Lord of
Goelso .... granting the land which Oliver Avenel (no
doubt another son of William) held of him, Stephen fil Roger
de Magnaville and Roger, his uncle, being witnesses. Geoffry
fil Robert de Magnaville held a tenement in Baskerville (fol. 8).

Fol. T03. Roger de Magnaville gave the church of Bemville,

which William Avenel, Richard and Oliver, his sons, attested

>

with William Magnaville.

Fol. 104. William Avenel confirms the grant of the land of
Boscherville, which was of the fee of Robert Magnaville, and
which they gave to Margaret, his wife, and Goisford, his son, with
the consent of Count Baldwin (de Redvers) and Stephen de
Magnaville.

For further information respecting the family of Magnaville
and their relations, the author must refer the reader to his
introduction to Mr. Glanville Richards* History of the House of
Glanville, where he has referred to this interesting family.

It must not be forgotten that the Magnavilles, or Mandevills,
were closely connected with the Rye family, Geoffry de
Mandeville having married Eudo de Rye's daughter. Eudo at
one time was the lord of all the property of the Vernons,
Redvers, and Magnavilles referred to in the Monteburg
Cartulary, having for some reason, perhaps as sheriff only,
obtained the inheritance of the family of St. Sauveur.

Hardly less pertinent, and perhaps more necessary to the
history of this fee, is that of the origin of the Vernons of Haddon.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 299

Obviously the Heralds are entirely at sea on this subject, and
have made some shocking guesses in order to confirm the theory
of the identity of the Vernons of Haddon with the great
family of Vernon of the County of Stafford in the time of
Domesday.

It appears from Omerod's History of Cheshire that prior to
this date it had been supposed that Richard de Vernon, who
married the co-heir of Avenel of Haddon, was the son of Sir
William Vernon, chief justice of Chester, who was a younger son
of the Baron of Shipbrook ; but Omerod, and following him, his
learned editor, the late Mr. T. Helsby, threw cold water upon
this suggestion, without, however, absolutely rejecting it ; and it
still holds its shameless head in Burke's Peerage, the only
difference being that Sir Bernard Burke has married the heiress
of Avertel to the Baron of Shipbrook himself. Omerod adds
that it seems more probable that he was a descendant of Walter
Vernon of Harlaston ; and if ever there was such a personage,
this would be no doubt greatly more likely, for the dates
absolutely disprove a descent from the justice of Chester. The
marriage with the heiress of Haddon took place probably early
in the reign of Richard I. or late in that of Henry H. Sir Wm.
Vernon was justice of Chester 15 Henry HI., some 50 years
later. The author of the pedigree published by Sir Bernard
Burke was therefore right as to the date in converting Sir Wm.
from father to son of Sir Richard, but absolutely without
authority for doing so, and more than this, in the direct face of
authority, for these two knights, Richard of Shipbrook, and
Richard of Haddon were separate, though contemporary person-
ages.

Burke's Peerage again states that Richard Vernon obtained a
grant of Peak Castle in 1252. This does not appear upon the
Pipe Rolls, but the name does ; and it seems that Richard de
Vernon was in that year an attorney or pledge for one Robt. de
Warth, a very different affair.

Shaw, in his History of Staffordshire, has taken to task
Collins and Edmonson, who are the authors of the absurd
Histories of the Vernon Pedigree, very severely, and he has
exposed the fact that these untrustworthy writers have actually
only given three descents from William Vernon of Domesday to
Sir William the justice of Chester, a period of 300 years ; and in

300 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

the short space of 99 years has given 10 descents from him to
Sir Richard of the time of Henry VI. ; and in writing his own
account, showing how history was then written, he adds, ** I have
inserted a Sir Richard partly in conjecture ; I rejected several
others." Mr. Helsby, in commenting upon this wonderful
pedigree, states that the writer of Shaw's account was a learned
antiquary named Samuel Pope Wolferston. It is fortunate that
he was so honest as to admit that he made up his pedigrees
partly by conjecture.

Now the groundwork of Mr. Wolferston's account is a charter
of Hugh, Earl of Chester, and of Matilde his countess, grant-
ing to Walter Vernon the land and honour of Harlaston, which
Walter, his grandfather, held of the Earl of Chester fnot
naming him), and which was then part of the dower of Maud,
his countess. However this may be, it was in the king's hands
in II Henry II., for the sheriff then accounts for 4s. 66. rent
for it This charter is set out in Shaw, but apparently is a
forgery. In the first place, Harlaston was never an honour, but
only part of the king's manor, none of the witnesses can be
identified, except the third, Eustace fitz John, who died at a
very advanced age in -1157, before Hugh, the Earl, succeeded
(1158); and the third place is hardly that in which we should
expect to find so important a personage as Eustace fitz John.
The first witness is one Richard fil the Earl of Gloucester,
apparently a mythical personage.

Maud, the countess, was the daughter of Robert, the son of
King Henry I., who married Maud, the daughter of William
Avenel.

But the Vernons were disseized, according to this charter,
for the lady held it in dower ; and we do not learn from the
charter itself of which Earl of Chester, Walter, the grandfather
of the donee, held it. Looking- at the dates, this would carry
us back to Domesday ; and then we find a Walter de Vernon,
and Wachiline a nephew of Walter de Vernon, as well as
Richard Vernon, holding lands of the Earl of Chester, but not
the manor of Harlaston, then part of Clifton, the king's manor ;
and subsequently Robert Marmion held it of the Earl of
Ferrers. If we could only rely upon this charter, it would
perhaps give a complete pedigree for the family. As it is,
there is no evidence, as there should be, of any kind to support

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 3OI

it, and having regard to its intrinsic improbabilities, we can
only regard it with suspicion.

We know nothing of any Walter Vernon, of Harlaston, in the
time of Henry II., though we have evidence, from the Stafford-
shire Pipe Rolls of 6 Richard I., that Haslaston had, previously
to that date, been the property of a Richard Vernon, and that
he had some time previously forfeited it, for the sheriff accounted
for 40s. rents, proof, General Wrottesley considers, that he was
an outlaw. The Derbyshire Pipe Rolls for the same year, it
must be remembered, show that Richard de Vernon and Simon
de Basset were each farming half the land of Avenel, of
Basselaw, then part of the Honour of Peverel. It also shows
that Robert Avenel was then an outlaw ; and the Bucks, and
Bedfordshire Rolls still add to the puzzle, for they show that
Simon Basset paid 100 marcs for having the land of Richard
de Vernon, which he took with his wife, which was the in-
heritance of Simon's wife; one Richard Vernon, an outlaw at
Harlaston, Stafford, another (or the same), farming his wife's
inheritance, and a third (or again the same), wrongfully
enjoying the land belonging to his wife's sister in Bucks,
and Beds.

It should be noted, however, that General Wrottesley in-
terprets the Bucks, entry as proof that Richard Vernon's
inheritance had passed to a female. This, however, appears
to the author to be erroneous, but if accurate, it itself disposes
of the alleged Harlaston descent.

In 7 Richard I., Richard Vernon's Harlaston estate was still
in the king's hands ; but in 8 Richard I. he agreed to pay ;^20
for twenty librates of land in Staffordshire, which General
Wrottesley, with much reason, assumes was Harlaston.

There is an entry in the Staffordshire Roll of Richard
Vernon being fined in 22 Henry II. ; this was possibly on
the occasion of his forfeiture. Testa de Nevil shows that in
39 Henry III., Richard de Vernon held Harlaston of the Earl
of Derby. Now, it is quite clear that the Earl of Derby
inherited some of the Staffordshire estates of the Earl of
Chester through his marriage with Agnes, daughter of Hugh,
Earl of Chester, the alleged grantor of Harlaston to Walter
Vernon ; but it is not so clear that Harlaston was ever part
of them. Clifton, no doubt, was held by the Earl. But this

302 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

was a separate manor, and no account shows that the Chester
family had ever held it. Gough s Camden II., p. 394, gives a
record, 27 Henry III., rot. iia, in proof, but this has not yet
been found.

There was a family named de Herlaston in the time of King
John, of whom nothing has been published. In I John, Robert
de Herlaston was essoinator in a Clifton suit, and in 6 John
William de Herlaston, and Amicia his wife, in a suit (which was
settled) between themselves, and one Henry de Dernston, in
which William fitz Herbert was called to warranty.

Huntback's pedigree of Vernon makes William de Vernon
the son of Richard, who married the heiress of Avenel, die

26 Henry HI., leaving two sons: Richard, who died s. p. 27
Henry III. ; and Robert, who died without male issue, leaving
a daughter and heiress, who married Gilbert le Francis, and
whose son assumed the name of Vernon. Other accounts
assert that Sir William married the daughter and heir of
Gilbert Francis of Harlaston, and no question can be raised
as to the fact that Gilbert Francis was Lord of Harlaston
tempe Henry IH. and Edward I., and that he died seized of it,
though we have not any inquisition which proves by what title
he acquired it. But the inquisition taken at his death in 6
Edward I. shows that he held Haddon, Roulesley, Basselaw,
and Bobenhall of the Earl of Derby, and that Richard was
his son and heir, aged fifteen. The inquisition after his death,
taken at Westmorland, shows that Richard, his son, was then
married to the daughter of Matthew de Harcla, and this after
Gilbert's decease.

Richard fil Gilbert Francis must have died young, and we
have no inquisition at his death. His son Richard died 16
Edward II. (forty-four years after Gilbert le Francis' death);
and he then held Harlaston and Appleby, Parva of the Honour
of Tutbury (then in the king's hands), which Richard, his father,
held in 8 Edward II., as also the Derbyshire estates.

Now these dates prove conclusively that Sir William Vernon
did not obtain these manors from Francis, for he held them at
his death, years after the decease of the former, and yet it is
clear that they were in the hands of a Richard Vernon in

27 Henry III., from whom Gilbert le Francis can only have
obtained them by marrying his daughter, or by purchase, for

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 303

in truth there is no evidence of the existence of any daughter
of this Richard, the suggestion being a mere guess.

This is brought down to a still closer date by a record of
Trinity Term, 42 Henry III., given by General Wrottesley,
from which it appears that Robert Vernon was alive that year,
for he and William de Camville were sued by Robert de
Beverley ; and it would seem that Richard de Vernon was still
alive, for Walter de Palton sued for land in Swinfen, which a
Richard de Vernon lost by a default. He however may have
been of the Cheshire family.

On 26th June, 1272, Margery, widow of Peter Anesy, and
Matthew de Anesy, sued Richard de Vernon, with Gilbert le
Francis and another, which seems to show that Richard Vernon
survived longer than is supposed, and that Gilbert Francis, his
successor, was associated with him in the inheritance.

Another very useful series of dates concerning the Tymmore
property shows the succession still more clearly, the mill of
which place was held by the Vernons under the Sage family.

Here, again, the Heralds, in their anxiety to magnify the
antiquity of the family, have endeavoured to show that the
Vernons held Tymmore as early as the reign of Henry I., and
they produce a lease as of that date from Petronilla le Sage to
William le Vernon; but William, son of this Petronilla, was
living 25 Henry HI., when he gave a fresh lease of the mill for
20 years.

Richard Vernon obtained a renewal of the lease in 41 Henry
HI. for 19 years ; and Gilbert le Francis obtained a lease in 4
Edward I., which Richard Vernon, son of Gilbert le Francis,
assigned in 8 Edward H. to Richard, his son. As we have
seen from the Inquisition Post Mortem, he was living this
year.

Appleby Parva came into the family of Vernon through the
marriage, tempe John, of Wm. de Vernon, said to be the Justice
of Chester, with the heiress of Stockport ; in the same way
Marple came into the family. This was granted by Ralf, Earl
of Chester, to Robert fil Robert de Stockport ; whose grant
was attested by Philip de Orreby, Justice of Chester, 1210-29, and
Wm. de Vernon. There is a suit in 21 Edward I. by Geoffry de
Camville against Richard Vernon for two acres of land \\\

304 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

Catnville ; but Richard was then in prison, and the suit was
respited.

Of the family of Francis little is known. They came into the
Vernon property between the years 1272 when Richard Vernon
was alive, and 1276-7, when Gilbert obtained a renewal of the
lease of Tymmore ; how is yet not positively known.

But this is known ; Gilbert le Francis, at his death, held a
great number of small properties in Cumberland and Westmore-
land, not of inheritance, but which he farmed. He, however,
held one property there which had been held by a John le
Francis, whose heir he evidently was. If it could be shown
that he was the son of this man, we might get the pedigree
still a generation higher, for a John, son of Robert le Francis
was well known in Staffordshire. In 11 Henry III. there
was an Assize in Stafford, if Robert, father of John, held the
manor of Huse, which Robert Howell then occupied, which
was settled by giving up one-fifth of the manor to John.

The Staffordshire Pipe Rolls show that Robert le Francis was
repeatedly fined for selling wine contrary to the assize. This
occurred fn 11 89, and in several years afterwards. In 5
Richard I. Robt le Francis was fined 40s. for making a false
claim. In i John he was again fined for selling wine in the
house of Tatmanslow. 11 John he was found guilty of
intruding into the land of Wm. de Pailes, in Handsworth,
whilst he was in prison. He was a native of Newcastle.

The result of the whole facts seems to indicate that the first
property obtained by the Vernons of Haddon was Haddon
itself, that Haslington was the next, which was obtained by the
payment of ;£'20 to the king in 6 Richard I., that the payment
was accepted probably because it had been Vernon property, but
which was forfeited as early as 1 1 Henry II., and was still in the
king^s hands ; that possibly it had belonged to the ancestors of
this Richard Vernon, or merely to some of the name ; and that
he was brought into England through his marriage with the
heiress of Avenel, he probably being one of the family connected
with the Avenels in Normandy, and a Vernon of the house of
Briones or Redvers.

In giving this account of tfie Avenel family, the author desires
to acknowledge the great obligation he is under to that eminent
antiquary Sir John Maclean, who, subsequently to the publica-

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 305

tion of the History of the House of Arundel, furnished the
author with very valuable references to the history of this family.
It is not always possible to acknowledge one's obligations to
others, though, in a case where much information is given, it is a
positive duty to do so. The author was unpleasantly reminded
of this very recently by reading in the Archaeological Journal
for Yorkshire an account of a family, the majority of the
notices concerning which were given by him to the writer of
it, who has not thought it fair to make any kind of acknow-
ledgment, though privately he was grateful and very anxious
to obtain further information.

18. — Galf de Firetry held one fee^ which Maurice his son
gave to the White Monastery^ who then held it

19. — Hubert de Curtenei held three feeSy of which Steplun,
his nepheWy then held two, and the Templars tlu third.

Note. — This name appears to be written Curcun in the
Black Book. Owing to the similarity of the letters t and c,
many records relating to the Curcun, or Curzon family, are
transcribed wrongly, Curton.

20. — Will fil Oton held one fee, which the White Monks of
Tame then held.

Note. — A William fil Oto married Maud, daughter of William
de Dive, by Matilda, daughter of Geoffry de Waterville and
Ascelina Peverel. This Geoffry was a descendant of Azelin, the
tenant of Geoffry Ascelin of Domesday.

21. — Pagan de Nivetoti held half a fee, and gave it to the
White Monks of Combremere.

Note. — The Pipe Rolls of 18 and 25 Henry II. mention a
Godwin de Newton, and 34 Henry II. mentions an Artur.

22. — Robt. de Chauces held one fee.

Note. — Goisfred Ascelin held Turalveston at Domesday, and
Robt de Calz succeeded to part of his inheritance. See more of
this baron hereafter under the certificate of Geoffry de Anselin.

23. — Henry de Cuneigeston held one fee, which William de
Hastings then held. *

24.— /^A» Turbelvill held one fee^ which Henry Hosato then
held

306 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

Note. — We know little of the first family in Derbyshire ; but
Henry Hosato was a well-known personage, who resided at
Averham or Egrum, Notts., which he acquired by marriage
with Avice, the daughter of Adam Tison and sister of Wm. of
the great baronial family, knights of the Mowbrays.

25. — William de Trusley, and then Robert, his son, held one
knight's fee,

26. — Atrop Hastings held one fee.

1

THESE KNIGHTS WERE ENFEOFFED BY MY
GRANDFATHER, WHICH I NOMINATE.

• [There is an erasure here in the original, as if the word had
been originally (proavus) great-grandfather, for which no doubt
it was intended, the next class of knights having been enfeoffed'
out of the demesne of his son, the maker's grandfather.]

27. — Nicolas de Breylesford, and then Henry, his son, who
Juld one fee.

Note — Testa de Nevil shows that Henry de Brailsford then
held one fee in Breylesford.

The Book of Aids states that Henry de Brailsford then held
half a fee in Brailsford and half in Wingerworth, formerly the
fee of Ralf, his father. This is one of the finest Derbyshire
pedigrees ; they were probably of English origin, descendants of
Elfine, who at the time of Domesday held Brailsford, Osmaston,
Balden, and Thurvaston. Ailson de Brailsford, probably the
same person, gave Osmaston to Tutbury, which created a great
feud between Odinel de Ford and the Prior some time after-
wards. . It is to be hoped that this pedigree may be clearly
established.

28. — Wiliiam fitz Herbert held one fee.

Note. — Testa de Nevil shows that Wm. fitz Herbert held
three parts of a fee in Ash.

1 175* John fitz Herbert was surety for his lord.

William fitz Herbert attested the charter of exchange between
Dun and Pantoul.

29. — Wm. de St, Quinten field half a fee.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 307

Note. — This family in the time of King John were repre-
sented by Robert de St Quinten, who married Albreda, the
daughter of Jordan Chevercourt.

30. — David de Stanton held half a fee.

Note. — Adam de Stanton, and William, his brother, attested
the earl's charter to William Pantoul.

Testa de Nevll shows that Robert fil William Stanton held
half a knight's fee in Stony Stanton. Several families of this
name were scattered about the county. One family was
identical with the Pincemas of Belvoir; whilst another, settled
at Kelum, were as clearly of the house of Albini of that Honour.
They were probably identical with the family of Abney.

3 1. — Ernald de Bee held half a fee.

Note. — Testa de Nevil shows that Robert de Tuke. and
Galf de Bee held \ of one fee in Milton.

G. de Bak and J. de Bak are mentioned in the charter of Wm.,
Earl Ferrars. Possibly they were of the Bakepuz family.

And Arnald and Henry de Bee were sureties for the earl in
23 Henry H.

Henry de Bee and Avice, his wife, answered to a plea of the
forest in 32 Henry H.

This name is frequently mentioned in Derbyshire records
down to the time of King Henry V.

32. — Adam fil Swanne held one fee^ then held by his heirs.

Note. — This is probably a descendant of Swain of CoUey,
tempe Domesday ; he is probably identical with Swain fil Swain,
a Thane, of the same period, who then held Chisworth direct
of the king. His name would indicate that he was of Danish
origin, and he would therefore readily be accepted tenant by a
Norman lord.

Swain Cilt (the younger) was probably the same person. He
held 10 manors under King Edward which Walter de Aincourt
held at Domesday.

Adam fil Swain is mentioned in a Pipe Roll of 12 Henry H.,
and traces of the family are to be found at a late date. In all
probability the family of de Colley, who continued resident at
Cowley, were of the same family. This, though not now an
important family, is a very interesting one.

308 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

33. Walter del Bee held one fee, which William de Cheisnei

then held.

34. — Hugofil Richard held one fee.

Note. — Robert fil Richard de Normanton was one of the
knights of the Earl de Ferrars.

35. — Roger le Grendon held one fee.

Note. — The Testa de Nevil shows that William de Grendon
held half a fee of Bubbersville of the old feoffment of Robt. St

George.

It is probable that the fee was at Bradley, which, according to
the chronicle of Thos. de Musca, was held by Serlo de Grendon,
who married the sister of William fil Ralf, the Justiciary of
Normandy, Sheriff of Nottingham and Derby, tempe Henry II.

Serlo de Grendon was living 24-33 Henry II.

27 Henry II. Walkelin de Bradly is mentioned ; William,
John Henry, and Robert de Grendon at a later date ; Hugo
fil Ralf in Kirby's Quest, Thomas, tempe Henry VI.

36. — Robert de Albini lield one fee.

Note, — This family has already been mentioned under
Tenant No. 3. It is not clear whether this Robert was the
son of William of the time of Henry II,, or his uncle, as the
first Robert died without male issue, the latter relationship is
the most probable. Here, doubtless, we get the stem of the
family of Abney in Hope (which Derbyshire historians have
mistaken for Habenai, the wasted manor of Wm. Peverel), who
are now represented by the Abneys of Willersley, The proofs
of this pedigree, which are very voluminous, for it is one of the
greatest in the county, must be deferred to the Parochial History.

37. — Ralf fitz William half a fee which Htmfry de Tolka of
Steple then held, and half a one which Maurice held.

Note. — Testa de Nevil shows that Robert de Tuke held
one-third of a fee with Galf de Bee in Hilton.

1 178. Hericus de Tuche was one of the sureties of the earl.
38. — Landries, which then Jordan, his son, held one fee,

THESE (LAST 13) KNIGHTS' FEES THE BARON,
MY GRANDFATHER, GRANTED OUT OF HIS
OWN DEMESNE.

[The Red Book omits the word grandfather, but it is supplied
by the Black Book.]

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 309

THESE THE EARL MY FATHER ENFEOFFED OF

HIS OWN DEMESNE.

39. — Hunfred de Tolka held one fee, (See No. 37.)
40. — Galf de Briencourt held one fee.
41. — Galf Salvage held half a fee.

Note. — At the same time, or a little later, Robert fil Galfry
(Savage) held Hints and Tipton of Robert de Stafford. At
Domesday these manors were held by the Bishop. In 11 56
Robert fil Galfry and Helius, his brother, attested a charter of
Walter, the Bishop.

The Testa de Nevil shows that Galf le Salvage still held one
fee in Hints, and Galfry fil Warin held one in Tibeton (Tipton),
which he had obtained in marriage with the daughter of Galf
le Salvage.

Kirkby's Quest shows that Hugh de Meynil held half a fee
in Hints and Tibeton, having married Philippa, sister and
co-heir of Galf Savage, who died without issue, 32 Henry II.

Helius fil Galfry le Savage held Pershaw (Worcestershire).

Galf le Savage granted land to Polesworth Priory, so did
William and Robert his brothers (Warwickshire).

4 Henry 11. Galf le Salvage paid 10 marcs for a venison
trespass (Derbyshire).

7 Richard I. Galf Salvage paid 100 m. for having his
father's lands in Warwickshire.

It would be Interesting to learn whether Robert le Sauvage,
who obtained a grant of the marriage of Havise fil Wm. fil
Walkelin with Steynsby in 3 John, was of this family. Very
possibly he was identical with Robert, mentioned in the Poles-
worth Cartulary. Inasmuch as William fil Walkelin was a
Ferrars, it is highly probable that a knight of that house
should secure his inheritance.

42. — Robert de Pir held half a fee.
Note. — His fee would seem to be in Hilton.
This knight, though holding so small a fee,#was a person
of great consequence. He seems to have been sheriff of the
county in the first year of Henry II., and in the sixth, when
Robert Earl of Ferrers died, he appears to have answered for
his estate, probably as farmer or as senescal.

3IO THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

1 178. Wm. de Piri was surety for the earl.

Thomas de Piru gave 3 bovates of land in Hilton to the
Church of Marston (Tutbury Cartulary). He was one of the
witnesses to the earl's charter to Maurice de Luvitot.

43. — William Giffard held half a fee,

44. — Maurice de Turtey held half a fee,

45. — Adam Vicompte Baroches held half a fee,

46 — Wm. de Tolka held a quarter of a fee, ((See Tenant
No. 37.)

47. — Hugo de Gobion held one-third of one fee,

48. — Somervilley Walter de^ Iteld \ of one fee.

Note. — The Black Book notes that Adam, Sheriff of Berk-
shire, and William de Tolka, held this part fee.

Robert, Earl of Ferrars, gave four bovates of land, which he
obtained in exchange with Walter de Somerville, to Burton
Abbey. Walter de Somerville held Wichnore and Terescob, in
Staffordshire, of Robert de Stafford, and which Roger de
Somerville held at the time of Testa de Nevil.

49. — William de Ferrars held one manor of the lord, his [the
Black Book states my) father, for which he made the service of
four knights.

This was possibly William fitz Wachel, Lord of Steynesby.

THESE NINE AND ONE-THIRD PARTS OF ONE
KNIGHTS FEE MY FATHER GAVE OUT OF
HIS OWN DOMINION.

Baggarugge is mine. For sixty knights should I do service
to you and Memstrums (Memtenin in the Black Book), Main
holds against me. So much may it please you.

Of Cruc I am disseized without judgment, which is one fee.

THIS IS THE SUM OF THE OLD AND NEW
KNIGHTS— LXXIX. KNIGHTS, AND A THIRD
PART OF ONE FEE.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

311

LIST OF TENANTS OF THE GREAT BARONY OF
WILLIAM, EARL OF FERRARS, FROM THE
YEARS 1066-1088 TO 1162 (PROBABLE DATE OF
CERTIFICATE).

[The number preceding the name is that of the tenancy ;
the number at the end, of the page where the account of such
tenancy is to be found.]

45-8. Adam, Sheriff of Berk-
shire, 310.
3. Albini, William fil
Nigel, 281.

3. Albini, Robert, 308.

36. „ „

6. Bakepuz, Robert, 285.

7. Baskerville, Henry, 286.
31. Bee, Ernald ; John his

son, 307.
33. Bee, Walter, 308.
45-8. Berkshire,Sheriffof,3io.
16. Boscheville, William ;

Ralf his son, 293.
27, Breilsford, Nic; Henry

his son, 306.
40. Briencourt, Galf, 309.
12. Cambrics, Henry, 290.
14. Camera, Galf, 291.

22. Chaucis, Robert, 305.
19. Curtenei, Hubert ;

Stephen his nephew, 305.

23. Cuneigeston, Henry,

305.

4. Curzon, Rich. ; Robert

his son, 282.
9. Dun, Robert ; James
his son, 287.
49. Ferrars, William, 310.

16. Fifehead, Rich, 292.
18. Firetry, Galf (qy.

Tirecer), 305.
43. Giffard, Will, 310.

14. Goldington, Peter, 291.
47. Gobion, Hugo, 310.
35. Grendon, Roger, 308.

10. Gresley, Reginald, 288.

15. Harcourt, Yvo (see

Heriz), 291.
26. Hastings, Aitrop, 306.

23. „ William, 305.
28. Herbert fitzWilliam,3o6.

24. Hosato, Henry, 305.

17. John, Odo fitz, 293.

38. Landries ; Jordan his
son, 308.

4. Luvitot, Robert, 289.

16. Marmion, Galf, Heirs of,

291.

5. Montgomery, Walter,

283.
21. Niveton, Pagan, 305.
20. Oton, William fil, 305.

11. Pantoul, William, 289.
10. Parvus, Ralf, 288.

42. Pir, Robert, 309.
14. Ralf, Robert fil, 291.
34 Richard, Hugo fil, 308.

312

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.-

41. Salvage, Galf, 309.
1&2. Sewell, Henry fil ; Fulc
his brother, 279.

29. St. Quinten, Wilh'am,

306.
1 3. Seyle, William ; Ralf

his son, 290.
48. Somerville, Walter, 310.

30. Stanton, David, 307.
32. Swain, Adam fil, 307.

44. Turtey, Maurice, 310.
39. Tolka, Hump, 308.
46-8. „ Williaip, 310.
25. Trusley, William ;

Robert his son, 306.
24. Turbelville, John, 305.
37. William, Ralf fil, 308.
8. Walkelin, Robert;

Robert his son, 286.
15. „ William, 291.

313

CHAPTER V.

flo. 2—Z\)c Cbarter of Waif l)an0eUn (anaelinO

TO HIS LORD HENRY, KING OF ENGLAND, RAD
ANSEL, HEALTH AND FAITHFUL SERVICE:
KNOW YE THAT IN THE TIME OF KING
HENRY YOUR GRANDFATHER I HAD THE
FOLLOWING KNIGHTS OF THE OLD FEOFF-
MENT :

I. — IVi// Ansel de Walesby (in one copy Wagerby) held two
knights^ fees.

Note. — Part of this manor with Kirkton or Schedrington, and
Wilgebi was soke to Grimston, some of it soke to Roger de
Busli's Manor of Tuxforde, some to Goisfred de Hanselin's soc
of Laxington. Wm. Lanceline's manors seem to have been in
all these parishes. Wm. Lanceline (Ansel) gave to Wm. fitz
Eudo de Hibaldeston with Cecilia his daughter in frank
marriage I bovat in Walesby. Alan fil Wm. Lancelin, of
Kirkton, gave his woods there to Robert de Laxington.
6 Edward II. Robt., son of Robert Lanceline, still held land
in Kirkton.

Rad de Wadeland in Walesby gave to Rufford Abbey the
services of John de la Chause, of Walesby, Wm. his brother,
Wm. fil Henry, Nic his brother, Robt D'aubeni, and Rich fil
Philip for their services in Walesby.

I Henry VIII, Wm. Bradbourne held land in Walesby,
Wellawe, and Kirton.

22

314 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

A William Hanselin attested a charter of Ralf Silvans to
Rufford Abbey concerning land at Wilibi of the fee of Gilbert
de Gant, who died 1156. (Mr. Saville's charters at Rufford
Abbey.)

2. — Walter de Derington held one knighfsfee.

3. — Rod de Middleton held one knighfs fee,

4. — Walter de Digby and William between them held two
parts of I fee.

Note. — This manor was probably in North Leverton.

2 Edward III. Robt. de Dyggeby and Sibell his wife fined
with Adam de Everingham, of Laxton, concerning this manor.

5, 6, 7. — Richard de Martinwast and William Sirewasi and
Puellus de Belcapo held three fees.

Note. — In the time of King Henry I. Robert Martinwast,
with the assent of Richard de Haia his lord and of Hugo
his brother, granted land in the marsh of Benedicts Ville to
Monteburg.

8. — Ralf fil Geremond held two fees, (See Robert de Chauz,
Charter No. 8.)

Note — This knight, no doubt, was the father of Wm. fitz
Ralf, Justiciar of Normandy and Sheriff of Nottinghamshire
and Derbyshire, whose history is unknown at present. Eyton,
indeed, doubts whether he was sprang from English parents, but
there seems to be no ground for this opinion. Thomas de
Muscam relates that he was lord of half Ockbrook and of Alvaston
cu soca, Ockbrook was clearly one of Geoffrey Ascelin's manors,
and it seems to have passed to the Bardolfs as heirs of Ralf
Hanselin. This must, therefore, have been one of his fees, and
as Alvaston was also a fee of Geoffrey Ascelin's, it was, no doubt,
the other.

9. — Robert fil Thomas held half a fee.

Note. — This fee was probably in Cuckney, where Roger de
Busli had a manor which Goisfred his man held. This Thomas
of Cuckney was the grandson of Joceus le Fleming, who came
into England at the Conquest, and son of Richard his son, who
married a cousin of the Earl Ferrars. Thomas, his son, founded
Wclbec.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 31S

10. — Robert de Bemecot and Robt fil Galfry held half a fee.
(See note to No. 15.)

•

12. — Henry and Roger de Westburg held two parts of one-fifth
of one fee.

Note. — Westburg is a manor in Lincolnshire which became
the property of Robert de Cauz, the successor to part of the
manors of Geoffrey Hansclin. Adam de Everingham settled
this manor on Thomas de Southwell in 4 Edward II., probably
as trustee for himself.

13. — Roger Bussard held one-twelfth of one fee of t/u purchase
of the Bishop Robert Bloet, whose mother he married, which I /told
of you in chief of that land, the Bishop disseized me this same
land, Ralf fil Hugh Crumwell holds.

Note. — This is a well-known family settled in Lincolnshire
and Leicestershire at the time of Domesday, tenants of Robert
Todeni, lord of Belvoir, and, indeed, the progenitors of the
House of Albini, one member of which succeeded to the
inheritance of Belvoir by marriage with a co-heir of Robert
Todeni. They acquired the name of Bosco Rohardi (here
abbreviated) from their residence at the place, part of the
Honour of St. Sauveur in the Cotentin, the hereditary posses-
sion of the family. (See the author's history of the House
of Arundel.)

In the Anniversaria of Belvoir Priory is to be found the name
of Helias Borrohard. He is probably identical with Helias de
Albini, whose charter, attested by Audierno, his brother, is to be
found in f. 120-b of that MS. (Harl MSS. 2044.)

Wm. fil Hugh disseized 100 solidatcs of land which I gave
to my son of my own demesne.

THESE ARE ALL THE OLD FEOFFMENTS MADE
IN THE TIME OF HENRY YOUR FATHER.

THESE ARE THE NEW.

14, — AlexK de Cressi held half a fee.

Note. — Roger de Cressi died 3 John. Cecilia, his widow, the
daughter of Gervase de Clifton claims dower against his son
William.

3l6 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

Wm. Cressi, of Markham (seal, three crescents and a bend),
settled the manor of Saxelby and advowson of Brodholm on
her. Roger de Cressi married Isabella, sister and heir of Wm.
fil Wm. fil Roscilin (de Rya), who granted a mill in Hunting-
field to Sibton Priory. (Harl MS. 2044).

I S'—Rad fil Galfry held half a fee.

Note — This fee was probably in Kirkton, or perhaps in
Eycring. Robert fil Galfry de Kirkton, held a toft there, and
granted it to Robt fil Nicolas the Baker of Tuxford which
Richard fil Toke held of Galfry his father, who gave it to
Albreda his wife and Robt his son. Robt the Baker afterwards
gave it to Rufford Abbey. (See RufTord Cartulary.)

16. — German fil Simon Iteld lialf a fee,

17. — Wm. Burdet held half a fee.

Note. — This fee was probably in Kirkton.

Burdet of Bramcote, Warwick, obtained Foremark, Derby-
shire, through the marriage with the heiress of Francis.

Alice de Bosco, heir of John Burdon, gave a wood in
Kirkton to Robt de Laxington, which Gumbert held.

John fil Sir John Burden, Kt 6 Edward 2.

25 Edward III. Sir John Burden of Mapelbec and Elizabeth
his wife conveyed them over to John de Ascam and another.

18. — Wm, de Line held half a fee,

19. — Galf fil Roger held half a fee.

Note. — It is not quite clear whether these last four knights
did not jointly hold the same half fee.

20. — Ralf fil Roger de Biles ton held half a fee.

Note. — Hugh fitz Roger was on the jury concerning the

Forest rights with Ralf Hanselin early in Henry II.'s reign.

He was seneschal of Philip de Strelley, 4 Henry III.

7 John. Philip de Strelly fined to have the posthumous

daughter of Richard fitz Roger to wife.

21. — Galf fil Gilbert Iteld half a fee,

22. — Reginald de Radclive held half a fee,

Anselinus de Radclive attested Robert fitz Ralf s charter of
land at Sutton Passeis to Lenton, given for the repose of the
soul of Adelina his wife.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 317

2^,— John de Galdeges held half a fee.

24. — Galfry de Fulbec held half a fee.

Note. — Little is known of the connection of this knight
with this county, or, indeed, of his family ; but by the aid of
the Rotuli Curiae Regis and other Rolls, a fair pedigree may
be constructed. They were knights of the Earls Conan and
Alan of Brittany, and hereditary constables of Richmond
Castle, though, as their surname of de Bosco confirms, they
were probably of the family of Magnaville, or Stuteville.
(See the author s Introduction to the House of Glanville.) They
were closely connected with the Albinis of Belvoir, and attested
many of their charters. Roald, son of this Galfry, and his
father, for they were of the same name, was constable of
Newark, and Alan de Bosco, son of Roald, was a frequent
witness to the charters of Leonia, the widow of Robert de
Stuteville, the heiress of half the barony of Hubert fitz Ralf,

Alan fil Galf, probably the same person as Alan fil Roald,
held land in Pickering in I Richard I. As his ancestor had
done previously, so did Wm. and Walter de Bosco, his suc-
cessors. There is reason to believe that the latter is identical
with Walter de Bosco, of Barlbro*, temp, Henry IH., who was
undoubtedly the progenitor of the family of Sitwell, of Ecking-
ton, now represented by Sir George Sitwell, Bt, M.P. Although
the connecting link has not yet been discovered, many facts
have been adduced which render it most probable, an Assize
Roll of the time of Edward I., establishing the fact beyond all
doubt that the father of Simon Sitwell of that date was the son
of this Walter de Bosco of Barlbro'. The names Sitwell and
Stutevill are probably identical. In the Testa de Nevil the
Lord of Eckington is styled " Sotville."

25. — Ulfiis de Seccobitok held half a fee.

Note. — This is a very interesting and purely English family.
This knight is, in all probability, the progenitor of the well-
known Derbyshire family of de Hathersage.

The place here indicated, Seccobiton, is no doubt Skegbi,
which formed part of Marnham, a portion of Roger de Busli s
great lordship. Ulf held Marnham in the time of the Confessor,
and probably there and in Sceggbi he still continued to hold

/

3l8 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

under Roger de Busli, who supplanted him. He is probably
identical with Ulf Fenesc, who with the Archbishop of York
and the Countess Godiva, had especial privilege with regard to
soc and sac, showing that he was one of the chief thanes of
the county. He or his son, perhaps both, were tenants of
Walter de Gant, in Eicring. Wulf fil Ulf de Eicring gave
three acres there of that earl's demesne to the monks of Rufford
to keep Godwin, his son, till he should be of age in their house.

A Walter de Skeggbi is also to be found mentioned in the
Rufford Chartulary.

Ulfus, or Wulfus fil Ulf had also two sons, named Gilbert
and William, to whom, with the consent of Maud St. Liz, his
wife, William Albini, lord of Belvoir, gave ten acres of land in
Eicring. Gilbert de Sceggbi, a grandson of Wulfus, also gave
land, part of this grant, to Rufford.

Mathew, son of William, son of Wulfus, was fined for some
forest trespass in that remarkable Assize (given at page 119) of
the 22 Henry H. He was the first Mathew de Hathersage.
He probably settled in North Derbyshire, owing to the con-
nection of his father with the Albinis, or Abneys of Hope, also
surnamed de Stoke, a branch of the Albini family of Belvoir.
The Chartulary now at Rufford Abbey gives evidence of
great interest on this point, which will be duly detailed in
the Parochial History.

The history of this family is a remarkably clear instance of
the stability of the English race under Norman dominance,
though in all probability it was by no means uncommon. The
notable circumstance here is the retention of their ancient
name to so late a date, the result, probably, of their high rank
prior to the Norman Conquest.

26. — Wm, de Westburg, (See note to No. 12.)

27. — Adam de Cressi, (See note to No. 14.)

AND WITH THE OTHERS IN MY OWN DEMESNE
I MAKE TWENTY-FIVE KNIGHTS, WHOSE
SERVICES I OWE TO YOU,

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

319

TENANTS OF RALF HANSELIN, TEMPE HENRY II.

1. Ansel, William.

7. Bellocampo, Puellus.
ID. Bernecot, Robert
20. Bileston, Ralf fil Roger.

13. Bussard, Rog.
17. Burdet, William.

14. Cressi, Alex.
27. „ Adam.

2. Derington, Walter.
4. Digby, Walter.

„ William
24. Fulbec, Galf.
23. Galdeges, John.

1 5. » Ralf.
10. Gal fry, Robert.

8. Geremund, Ralf fitz.

21. Gilbert, Galfry fil.

18. Lincoln, William.

5. Martinwast, Rd.
3. Middleton, Rad.

22. Radclive, Reginald.

19. Roger, Galf fil.
2a „ Ralf

16. Simon, German fil.

6. Sirewast, William.

9. Thomas, Robert fil.

23. Ulfus de Scobbiton.
12. Westburg, Henry.

Roger.
26. „ William.

320

CHAPTER VI.

tio. 3*— Carta 1?oficr &c 3Buron*

TO HENRY, THE KING OF ENGLAND, DUKE OF
NORMANDY, AQUITAINE, AND EARL OF
ANJOU. ROGER DE BURON.— HEALTH.— CON-
CERNING MY KNIGHTS WHO HELD LAND IN
THE TIME OF KING HENRY I. KNOW THAT
THEY ARE:

I. — William de Heriz who holds two fees,

2, — Roger de Cotingstock holds in Cortinstock and Rempston
two fees.

Note. — This Roger de Cortingstock confirmed the grant of
Andrew de Cortingstock and of Robert, his son (Roger's
father), to Lenton.

Robert fil Andrew de Cortingstock was a knight of Hugh de
Huron's in 1147. John de Cortingstock was a witness to a
Sutton Passeis charter in 1278.

3. — Patricius de Rosel holds one knighfsfee.

4. — Albertus^ who my father enfeoffed after tJte death of King
Henry, holds one knighfs fee, and I myself do service for four
knights fees of my demesne.

321

CHAPTER VII.

tio. 4*— Carta fcaecuW flDuear^

OF THE OLD FEOFFMENT.

I. — Aitorp Hastings, five fees, (See No. 7 of the Earl de
Ferrars* knights.)

2. — Oliver de Mara^ two fees,

3. — Maen de Hatrop, two fees,

4. — Walter de Eston, two fees,

5. — Galfrey de Cheleworthy one fee.

The sum of his old feoffment, twelve knights, and of his
own demesne of the new feoffment. Two and a half, and
one-fifth of one fee namely,

6. — William de Caisneto, half a fee.

7. — The widow of Richard Musard holds in dower two fees,

8. — Fulco de Musters, one-fifth of one fee.

322

CHAPTER Vlir.

tio. 5*— Charter of Robert be Cbau3»

ROBERT DE CAUS— DE CAUCIS.

Genealogists appear to have satisfied themselves with guess-
ing, instead of investigating, the facts pertaining to the history
of this baron ; and the consequence is not satisfactory. Yet
there exists many facts which might lead to a discovery, for
this is quite clear, that, although not the holder of great
manors, we find the first Robert de Cauz in high company very
shortly after Domesday, signing the Foundation Charter of
Lenton next after the Earls of Leicester and Northampton, and
Hugh de Grentmesnil, Sheriff of Leicester, and before all the
great Nottingham and Derbyshire barons, the Burons, the Fitz-
Ralfs, and the Avenels. Of course there was some reason for
giving this consideration, and it is probably to be found in his
near relationship to Hugh de Grentmesnil, whose guest he
probably was upon that occasion.

Now, turning to the Grentmesnil pedigree, we find that all
those personages named were closely related. Robert, Earl of
Leicester, was son-in-law of Hugh de Grentmesnil, and Simon,
Earl of Northampton, was closely related to his mother ; and
one of his aunts married William de Say, of the family of
Avenel, and another Robert de Curci ; and the question
immediately arises, was this name Robert de Curcis identical
with that of Robert de Curci ? This seems very probable,
for a final s is frequently dropped or adopted, and both families

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 323

spelt their names in very much the same manner. Chauces
is very near Chauci, or Chaucis, and Kawcis, or Kwarces.
Other forms occasionally used are still more like it These are
the forms in which both the Cauz family and that of de
Chaworth usually spelt their names in the earlier charters
we possess; but no name, perhaps, has been subject to such
exquisite torture of misspelling as this. It would not be
difficult to enumerate above a score of different forms of it.

The first notice we possess is in the remarkable certificate
of William, Earl of Ferrars, which proves that Henry de
Ferrars enfeoffed the ancestor of Robert de Chaucis, who was
then his tenant prior to co88? At the same time, it may be
noted that Galf C?imara held two fees, which Robert fil Ralf
and Peter de Goldington then held. We next hear of Robert
de Caucis holding land in Wragby, Lincolnshire, in 11 12-14
(four carucates and five bovates, and one-third of one),
apparently with Goisfridus de Hanselin, who would appear to
be living as late as the 26th Henry I., since, it is alleged (?) that
he fought at the Battle of the Standards. This is unfortunately
the only reference to the Hanselin family in this document. (See
Mr. J. Greenstreet's edition, page 16, line vii., of the facsimile, 1 1
of the translation.) Mr. Chester Waters, in his edition of this
important document, states that the one was son, the other
son-in-law, of the Domesday Lord, Goisfred de Hanselin, or
Ascelin. But, unfortunately, though so very positive, he
adduces no proof whatever in support of his assertion ; and
the document, presently to be quoted, seems positively to
contradict it It has been contended that Robert de Calz
succeeded to a part of Geoffry de Hanselin's estates, but we
have no proof that the Geoffry of 1 1 14 was not him of 1086,
and certainly Ranulf de Hanselin did not succeed until a few
years, at most six or seven, after the Battle of the Standard.
That there were two Goisfred de Hanselins seems to be a mere
assumption on the part of Mr. Chester Waters.

In the first great Roll of the Pipe, we find some very
important entries relating to this knight. £226 was paid upon
the pleas of G. de Clinton for the land .which Robert de Calz
obtained with his mother, and 200 marcs besides, that the
king might exonerate him from certain pleas at Blythe ; and,
with Walter his son, he paid 100 marcs of silver, and one of

324 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

gold, for a grant of the land of Leowin Chidde, that is, Leowin
the younger. In Derbyshire, Lewin Cilt held Sapperton and
Breaston at Domesday ; but neither of these manors are con-
cerned in this entry. The land which he obtained wi^h his
mother, it is generally taken for granted, was the twelve and
half fees of the Honour of Goisfred Ascelin. We find some
colour for this statement in a Pipe Roll of 14 Henry H.,
where this number is deducted from the holding of Ralf
Hanselin, and said to be in the king's hands, possibly only
deducted for the purpose of dower ; but it may be, perhaps,
that the lands of this lady were a portion of Roger de Busli's.
In the present Roll, Ralf Hanselin accounts for 200 marcs of
silver, and one of gold, for a relief for his father's lands, of
which he obtained only the twenty-five fees. Now, it would
appear from the records of the Knights of St John of Jerusalem
(Mohas., Vol. II., page 534), that Amicia was the name of this
lady, and that she was with Robert, her son, a benefactor of
that foundation. But possibly this was a second, or even a
third, Robert de Calz, for the number of the barons of this
name is by no means clear.

It would appear from the charter relating to the land of
Galfry de la Fremunt, the chief tenant of Robert de Calz,
that his mother must, in some way, have been connected with
the family of Roger de Busli, for in the reign of Henry I.
Jordan fil Halan, Lord of Tuxford (no doubt his nephew),
granted the whole of the manors held by this tenant of Robert
de Calz to him ; and the fine of 200 m. which, according to
the first great Roll of the Pipe, Robert de Calz accounted for
at Blythe, was probably in respect of these fees. Thoroton,
Vol. III., p. 213, asserts that this Jordan fil Alan was sheriff
of these counties the previous year. But that may be an
error, for Ivo de Heriz answered for the rents of the manors
of the county, and for the old farm of the same. The late Mr.
Eyton has endeavoured, unsuccessfully it appears to the present
writer, to prove that William Peverel was the earlier sheriff;
but there seems every reason to believe that Ingelram, Lord
of Alfreton, was hereditary sheriff of the two counties. He
may, indeed, have succeeded Jordan fitz Alan, who was his
cousin, in the sheriffdom, but there seems to be no proof of it.
At any rate, his descendants enjoyed the sheriffdom for four

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 325

generations. The first great Pipe Roll shows that, for some
cause, Ranulf fil Ingelram had been disseized, for he paid a
small fine of ten marcs to repossess his lands ; and possibly
during this period a deputy had acted for him. As before
noticed (page 94), Jordan fil Alan was probably identical with
Jordan de Busli, also mentioned in this Roll ; and it would
seem that he must also be identical with that Jordan fil Ernald,
the brother of Roger de Busli, through whom the Viponts
claimed. This discrepancy in the name of Jordan's father was
probably well known in the reign of King Henry III., when
the great Busli suit was in issue ; and it will account for the
omission in that suit of the Christian name of Jordan de Busli's
father. Probably Roger de Busli had brothers of both names.
It is to be hoped that this clue, when worked out, may throw
a clearer light upon the bistory of the family.

It would seem from the expression, " Robert de Calz received
this land with his mother," that he obtained her marriage and
dower (twelve and half fees being exactly one-third of Goisfred
Hanselin's fees), and this fee, notwithstanding its illegality,
remained in the possession of the family of de Calz. It is
nearly certain from this that this lady was the widow of
Goisfred Hanselin. But Robert de Cauz was probably her son
by her second husband (who was probably Robert de Caucis,
the witness of Lenton Priory, and afterwards the Forester of
Nottingham). That Robert de Calz was descended from the
Forester is stated in several records, but although the mode of
descent is given, it is not stated whether he was heir on the
part of his mother or of his father. We have proof that,
during the reign of Stephen, Robert de Caus enjoyed the
land, for which he had fined, for in 11 39, Alexander, Bishop
of Lincoln, in founding the Priory of Hafreholm, gave satis-
faction to Ralf Hanselin and Robert de Caus, the Lords of
Stretford (Monas., Vol. II., p. 792, old edition).

In 4 John (R.C.R. No. 17), Matilda, widow of Robert de Caus
(he left a widow, as appears by the Lady's Roll of 33 Henry II.,
who was the daughter of Richard Basset, Chief Justice of
England ?) sued John de Caus for her dower in Kilburn,
Bliburc, and Redburn, in the County of Lincoln. It seems
incredible that this lady could have been the widow of the
lord of 33 Henry I., but it is just possible.

326 . THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

John de Caus contested the claim with regard to Bliburc. He
was, therefore, clearly the son of a previous marriage, for his
mother was already endowered therein. This leads us to a mass
of information somewhat difficult of digestion ; but it opens up
the possibility of the mother of Robert de Calz having had no
inheritance which could descend to her son, she having been the
second wife of both her husbands. (See more of this matter
hereafter in No. 7, Charter of Ralf fil William de Walichville.)

Turning to the Lincolnshire Roll, we find that in 11 12-4
Gilbert de Calz (fo. 3) held 5 bovates in Ounebi, 4J in Bliburc, 4
in Wadingheheim ; and that Gilbert fil Gocelin held 7 bovates
in Bliburc, land in Harpswella, Glentworda, Ingham, Cotes,
Hacktorn, Ounebi, which Robert de Haia held of him ; sum, 10
carucates and 2 bovates.

Nigel Albini also held land in Bliburc.

From the same Roll (fo. 4) we find that Gilbert, son of
Goscelinus, held other carucates in Redhurne, Botelsford, Asebi,
Scallibi, and Wadingham ; together, 1 1 carucates and 3 bovates.
It would seem, therefore, that both Robert, and John de Caus,
his son, inherited the land of Gilbert fil Goselin of the time of
Henry I. He was a great landowner ; and we find many other
entries in this Roll relating to him.

(Fo. 8.) Robert, the Bishop of Lincoln, of the barons of the
king, holds in Stowa i carucate of Gilbert fitz Gocelin. (Fo.
9.) Gilbert fil Goscelin holds in Viflingcheheim 6 carucates ;
(fo. 10) in Teflesbi, Wiflingeham, and in Normanabi. (Fo. 15.)
In Chelebi Gisl de Chaz holds 2 bovates, and in Harburc,
Neosum, and Brochesbi. (Fo. 18.) Gisl, son of G. and Geradus,
in Sticheswold. (Fo. 19.) Gislebertus, son of Gocelinus, 2 caru-
cates in Welletuna ; Freschena (fo. 20) in Marchebi 4 bovates,
Maltebi 4 bovates, which Walter fitz Ragmerus holds; (fo. 22)
Houtona, Bekering, Snellesland, Reresbi, Suntorp, and Bleseby ;
(fo. 24) in Aschi, Sumerdibi, Tedford, Hamrigheheim, and
Endrebi.

There was a Robert de Caus of Ingwardine who died
without issue in 1187, leaving a brother Alexander, but his
widow's name was Lucia. In 1226 Alexander demised to Wm.
de Creddon.

The Pipe Rolls of Henry II. show distinctly what was the
lands for which Robert de Cauz paid so large a sum at the time

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 327

of the first great Roll of the Pipe, but they do not show under
what right of succession he obtained them ; and it is probable
that this was one of the high-handed acts so common in that
age. It would seem that it was not his mother's inheritance,
though it may have been his grandmother's ; but it is probable
that it was part of Goisfred Hanselin's. He certainly enjoyed
part of it in his mother's lifetime (as the Lincolnshire Rolls
prove), in conjunction with the true heir ; and he paid a relief
for his inheritance the same year. All this forms a story so
complete, that but little doubt is left as to its true meaning ; but
if any doubt remained, it would be clear, from the notices in the
Roll of 14 Henry II., when the entire inheritance of Ralf Hanseiin
is acknowledged to be 37 J fees, and 12 J or one-third are still
stated to be in the hands of the king, although another part of
the same Roll discloses the fact that Robert de Chauz was
holding them, perhaps as farmer: we do not know when
his mother died, and the excuse for his doing so may have
remained for a long period.

Ralf Hanseiin died before 18 Henry II., for Thomas Bardolf
his heir then paid scutage for 25 of his fees. There are
several entries upon the Pipe Rolls which are worthy of con-
sideration, if only to show the position of Robert de Calz.
Thoroton seems to deny that he was ever forester, and would imply
that William de Peverel held the office, because in the first Roll
of the Pfpe, which he erroneously asserts is the date of i Henry
II., he then accounts for ;^23 6s. 8d. for the pleas of the forest ;
and when his estate was in the hands of the king the sheriff
accounted for £4 for waste of the forests ; and he assumes
that the sheriff had the whole revenues and profits of them.
But it by no means appears clear whether the first item has in
fact anything to do with the pleas concerning the forests, or at
any rate with the especial office of the forester. The ordinary
pleas of the Crown were called pleas of the forest because the
king frequently heard suits whilst hunting, and the payment of
£4 may well have been for some forest trespass of the exiled
baron. Thoroton (or rather Serjeant Boun, for he is the author
of this account) has overlooked a most important entry, which
shows distinctly that Robt. de Chauz held the oflfice (in a Pipe
Roll of 3 Henry II.) " Robert de Chalz renders composition of
20 marks for the ministry of the forest," and he may have held

328 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

the office much eariier, possibly at the date of the Lenton
charter.

It would seem that Robt de Cauz was not a favourite with King
Henry II., for in the 6th of Stephen he included in a charter to
the Earl of Leicester, which may be genuine, though it was
never acted upon, the estates of Robert de Chalz; and lo
Henry II. Robert de Calz, besides paying ;£^20, paid 40 m. de
misericordia Evidently he was now in some fresh trouble.
Nor does he appear to have recovered his position, for in 13
Henry II. Rich Ursel, his tenant, pays for him ; and in 14 Henry
II. Reginald de Lucy pays ;^20 de censu foresta, and owes
£1$ i6s. de misericordia of Robt.de Calz: and he is charged
12J marks for scutage, so that Richard de Lucy was evidently
farming the inheritance

In 16 Henry II. there is a curious entry. Matthew and John
render composition of £S for having the goods of Stephen the
forester. The following year Ralf Hanselin was dead, and
probably Robt de Calz. The king excuses the balance of his
fine, ^15 16s. The sheriff accounts for ;^i8 9s. 6d., the pleas of
the forest, and ^80 28s. 8d. for wastes and assarts for the
counties of Nottingham and Derby.

In 21 Henry II. there is an entry Fridbor de Terra, Robert de
Chaucis.

In 23 Henry II. Ralf fitz Stephen pays ;^20 de censu foreste
in Sherwood. Was he in any way connected with the forester
Stephen who died only a few years previously ?

In 9 Richard I. Ralf fitz Stephen paid ;^I2 scutage for the
fees of Robert de Calz, by which time he had married the
heiress ; and we know that he was dead before the 6th of King
John, for that year Godfrey de Albini fined with the king for
;£'iooo for license to marry Matilda de Calceto, the widow of
Ralf fitz Stephen ; and he modestly adds, " si ipsa voluerit eum
accipere." It would seem that his modesty was not at fault, for
there is a subsequent entry in the Roll showing that no payment
was made ; the king forgiving the debt

The previous year the Earl of Huntingdon was ready to
account for 1,000 marcs that his son Henry should marry Maud
de Cauz with her inheritance In 15 Henry III. Stephen de
Seagrave bought and paid for the marriage of Emma de
Cans, a widow, for his son John.

i

J

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 329

The history of Ralf fitz Stephen is involved in obscurity,
and we must probably look to the history of the Caus family
to unravel it. Turning to the Lincoln Roll, 11 14, we find that
Gilbert fil Goisfridus de Calz held lands in the manors of
Westletebi, Sunetorp, Snellesland, and Reresby, all in the
wapentake of Wengho, and, curiously, Simon fil WiUiam de
Kime held land in all these places. Now, from the Kirkstead
Chartulary (Cott Lib. Vesp. E. xviii.) in 1163, we find a Simon
de Cauci attested a charter of Philip de Kime, son of Simon,
and from this chartulary we can draw a complete pedigree of
this family of fitz Stephen for several generations, all of them
dealing with those four vills of Gilbert de Calz.

(Fo. 109.) Stephen fitz Herbert, Cantfera of the King of
Scotland, granted land in Sunetorp and Snelland to the Abbey,
to which Philip de Kime was a witness.

(108 C. V. L.) Stephen de Wikekebi (no doubt the same
person) granted the manor of Westletebi to the Abbey, to
which Robert de Curli, Hugo de Ard, and Hugo fil Com de
Warwick, with Simon de Kime were witnesses. This charter,
from the name of the last witness as well as from its place in
the chartulary, clearly precedes the other in point of date.

Simon de Wik Camera granted land in Wik {tempe Lambert
de Scoteny), in which he mentions Robert his son ; attested
amongst others by Roger de Derby and Drogo fil ^alf
William, Earl of Warwick, confirmed this charter, Robt. de
Curli, Hugo de Ard, Hugo, brother of the Earl, and Simon de
Kime attesting.

(Fo. 109.) Williaqi fitz Eudo gave a toft in Reresby, to which
Stephen Camera was a witness (at fol. 23 of the chartulary
there is mention of a Eudo fil Gocelin). Stephen Camera with
Ralf Tany (?), Drogo Freville attested the charter of Martin
Martel of Canwich. (Gilbert de Gant's manor.)

(Fo. 109.) Ralf fil Stephen de Hoiland gave a toft in
Snelland.

(Fo. 117.) Ralf fil Stephen de Wibreton gave land in Snel-
land and Sunetorp. The names of the vills out of which these
grants were made, clearly show that the families of Wikekebi,'
Wik, Hoiland, and Wibreton were identical.

Ralf fil Ralf de Wibreton confirmed with Stephen and Roger
his brothers.

330 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

(Fo. 1 196.) Helto de Snelland gave land there of the fee of
Rad de Hoyland and of William fil Gauf, which Robert Marmion
attested. He himself attested a charter of William fil Eudo
concerning Reresby. Ralf fil Stephen confirmed Helto's charter,
so did Ralf fil Ralf fil Stephen de Holland, obviously the
same family, Wibreton lying in Holland.

The William fitz Ralf mentioned in Heltons charter was
probably William fitz Ralf (de Hardwick) of Steynesby, who
was a son of Pagan de Scapwick. Sir Jocelyne de Scapvvick
attested his charter. Ralf fil Stephen de Hoiland attested Robt.
de Carlton's charter.

(F. 1 16.) We have a Robert fil Stephen Camera of Wiken-
hebi, who also granted land in Wcstletebi.

There is no doubt whatever that Ralph fil Stephen was closely
related to the chamberlain or Camera of Henry H., to whose
office he ultimately succeeded. In 3 Henry H. it is stated that
Ralf fitz Stephen paid in the Camera of the king by the
hands of Warin fitz Gerald, who about the same time
ceased to hold the office, as we have seen Robt. de
Chalz accounted this time. We have met with a Geradus
before in Lincolnshire holding land in conjunction with Gilbert
de Chalz. Now, if Chalz or Caucis is the same name as Cauci,
this Warin was probably the son of the former. Guarin fitz
Gerald was one of the witnesses of Henry H.'s charter to the
Earl of Chester just mentioned, and Robert de Curci Dapifer
or Camera was also a witness to it, though what his relationship
was we do not know, and we find at Belvoir Castle two charters
of Guarine fitz Gerald, Camera Regis, and Alice de Curci his
wife granting land to Fulc Breant and Henry de Codham.

Robert de Curci was in England in the time of William
Rufus, for he attested his charter to Lincoln. Surely he was the
witness of this charter to Lehton only a few years later, and
uncle of Robert de Cauz of Nottingham. But we must resort
to Norman records for an account of the family in order to
explain their connection with the Grentmesnils.

They were seated at Curci sur Dive, and were neighbours
and allies of the great families of Giroe and Grentmesnil.
Ordericus gives an account of their warfare with Robert de
Belesme, the exiled Earl of Arundel. Richard de Curci was then
an old man like the great Hugh de Grentmesnil, but they

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 33 1

both acted vigorously in this campaign, and in no small
degree contributed to its success. Ordericus as usual gossips
about the relations between the two families, and tells us that
Robert de Curci had married Rohaise, daughter of Hugh de
Grentmesnil, and that she had borne him five sons. We learn
also from Ordericus that the seneschal or Camera of Hugh
Grentmesnil was one Gerald by name, who was governor of the
Castle Neufmarche. Probably Warin fitz Gerald, who married
Alice Curci, was his son. We know that Robert de Cauz had
a sister Alice, for she held a fee of him, as appears by the
first part of the reign of Henry II., of new feoffment. Richard
de Curci attested the charter of William the Conqueror to the
Abbey of Marmoutiers, confirming the grants of Nigel de
Constantine (Albini) to that institution. Again, with Hugh
Grentmesnil, he attested the charter of the king to the Abbey
of SL Stephen at Caen, and a few years earlier amongst the
knights of the same Viscount St. Sauveur, granting land to the
same Abbey is the name of Goisfridus fil Robert Venator, who

«

may possibly be the father of Gilbert Chalz of Lincolnshire,
for the suit of the time of King John shows clearly that they
were all of one family, and this record his profession.

Robert de Cauz gave Doverbeck to Thurgarton Priory.

It seems very probable that the family of lorz of Burton
were a branch of this family, but still more clearly would it
appear that the Chaworths are so. In the reign of Henry II.
their name was spelt Chaucis, and in some documents re-
lating to Marnham it was spelt Kawcs, which is as near the
name Caus as a blundering scribe could make it, and utterly
unlike the modern form of their name.

It is doubtful whether that Robert de Caucis who married
the daughter of Ralf fil William de Waltville or Walichville
was the founder or the intermediate ancestor of the house of
Chaworth. The Red Book gives no intimation where the fee
lay, and we can only judge from the context that it was one
of Goisford de Hanselin's manors. Thoroton assumes that it
was Marnham, but without any proof It must not be forgotten
that at Domesday the manor was held by Ingram, lord of
Alfreton.

In 14 Henry II., the Pipe Rolls show that Robert de Chaucis
paid 20s. for one fee to the scutage of that year, but there is no

332 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

proof that Marnham was the fee referred to in the certificate of
William de Walichville, and it would seem that John, the
constable of Chester, whose claim to it could only be through
the de Buslis Lords of Ingram's family granted the Church of
Marnham to the Knight Templars, with whom it remained
until the reformation of Henry VIII., when, of course, it fell
into reformed hands. King John, in the fifth and sixth years
of his reign, confirmed to Robert de Chaucis the manors of
Marnham and Wadworth, which it was stated was the in-
heritance of William, his father, but these grants often lie,
especially in King John's reign, and at this time probably
the marriage of William de Chaucis with the ultimate heiress
of Alfreton had taken place.

In 14 Henry III., William de Chaucis (son of Robert)
acknowledged *hat he owed Alice, Countess of Auge, 55 marks
of the fine made some, time previously between them, and in
28 Henry III. the king confirmed the grant of the said Countess
of Ewe to Robert de Lexington, of the custody of the whole
land which was William de Chaucis' in Marnham. Upon the
whole circumstance of the case, it would seem that Marnham,
like Edwalton, devolved upon the Chaworths and the Lathams
by reason of these marriages with the co-heirs of fitz Ralf of
Alfreton, and the deeds so judiciously arranged by Thoroton
must be displaced. The family very possibly held Marnham
of the fitz Ralfs, though King John, for some reason, was
induced to ignore them. It must be remembered that the
Countess of Ewe had not yet re-established her claim to
Roger de Busli's inheritance. The grants of William de
Kawrcs, son of Robert de Kawrcs, to Radford, may have
been made by the last William.

A Robert de Chaucis held one fee and a half of William
Albini, Lord of Belvoir, in Leicestershire, of the old feoffment.
Looking at the connection of the Curcis with the house of
Belvoir (Roger Albini, the head of that family, tempe the
Conquest, having married another daughter of Hugh Grent-
mesnil), it would seem to refer to that connection.

The only Ferrars manor that can be distinctly traced to the
Cans family is that of Bradborne, which Lysons states, though
he gave no authority, was held at an early period by the
family of Caws or de Cauceis.

/

7

/

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 333

The church was given by Geoffry de Cauceis, in 1205, to
the Priory of Dunstable, and he conveyed the manor to Godarde
de Bradbourne, in the reign of King John. In all probability
this Geoffry de Cauceis was the tenant for one fee of new
feoffment mentioned in the certificate of Robert de Cauz, in
I — 12 Henry II.

A manor in Brampton, called Caws Hall, was held by the
family at a very early period. Lysons asserts that it was
given iemfie Henry II. to Peter de Brampton, whom he sup-
poses was the second son of Maud de Cans. He, however,
erroneously supposes that Adam (Peter's father) was the second
husband of this lady, so that it is obviously a mere guess;
besides, the dates show it is wrong, for Ralf fitz Stephen
(Maud's second husband) was living in the time of King John.
The manor was held under the Musards, and was probably an
old holding of the family.

It may be asked why Hugh de Grentmesnil was a party
to the grant of the Lenton charter, and it is difficult to account
for his presence, except that possibly he was enjoying a hunt-
ing expedition. His only estate in the county was Roger
Pictaviensis s manor of Edwalton, which he held in demesne.
How it came to him does not at present appear, but his
tenant, Robert fitz Ranulf de Alfreton, gave the church to
Beauchief Abbey, and Thomas de Chaworth confirmed it

Robert de Lathom, who is now represented by the present
Earl of Derby, held the other half, the Earl of Leicester, whose
ancestor had married the heiress of Grentmesnil, then being
chief lord.

Ralf Basset-, of Draiton, held one-third of the honour which
Thomas de Chaworth held of him. It must be remembered
that Matilde, daughter of Richard Basset, the Chief Justice,
was the wife of a Robert de Cauz ; how many there were in
succession of this name as yet has not been satisfactorily
determined.

There is yet much to be done in order to obtain an accurate
account of the family of Curci. They were settled in various
parts of the country, but are probably -all of the same race.

At Domesday, Richard de Curci, who attested several of
the Conqueror's charters, held Newham, Lecendon, and Foxcote,
in Oxfordshire. He commanded at the Battle of the Standards,

334 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

and was succeeded by Robert de Curci, who Founded the Priory
of Cannington, in Somersetshire, and who held the post of
Sewer to the Empress. This was probably the witness to the
charter of Henry II. of the date of 6 Stephen already noticed.
It is not quite clear what relation he was to William de
Courci, of Stoke Courcy, Devon, who founded that Abbey.
Eton College has a charter of William Curci, the king's dapifer,
made to St Andrew's of Stoke, for the repose of the souls of
Wm. his grandfather, and William his father, of a mill of
Norham, which he bought of Hugh Golafre, the witnesses to
which were Geoffry the Prior, Wm. Pantoul, John de Curci,
Jordan de Curci, Simon fitz Peter, Wm. de Reigni, Wm. his
nephew, Wm. and Durand Poher, Hugh Pincerna, Osbert de
Eston, and Wm. Chaudel. This knight is said to have been
the great grandson of Wm de Faleise and Geva. There is
something very • wrong in the history of this family ; in one
account Wm. de Curci is said, in the time of Henry II., to
have ratified the grant of Avice de Rumeli, his mother, who
was the daughter of Wm. de Meschines, brother of Ranulf,
Earl of Chester, to Ardington, in Yorkshire, of half Helthwaith
and Swindon. In another, this lady is called Alice, and is said
to be the daughter of Robert de Rumeli, of Skipton, by Cicely,
daughter of Wm. de Meschines, and to have been the wife of
William fitz Duncan, Earl of Murres, and their daughter Cicely
to be the wife of Alexander fitz Gerald. Another record of
the 23rd Henry II. mentions that Alice, daughter and heir
of Wm. de Curci, then in her minority, was the wife of Warin
fitz Gerald, who enjoyed her inheritance. This must have
been Alice de Curci of the Belvoir charter, but there is probably
a confusion of epitaphs, as Mrs. Malaprop would observe. A
William de Curci was Justice of Ireland, tempe Henry II. A
John and a William were living in the time of Richard I.,
all of the Devonshire branch of the family.

FEES OF ANCIENT FEOFFMENT.

I. — Galf de la Fremunt held two knights' fees ; he also held one
of new feoffment

Note. — He held lands in Kirkton Wileghby, Walesby, Bes-
thorpe, and Birchwood, which his brother ultimately sold to
Hugh Bardolf Matilde de Cauz, of her own free will, without

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 335

her husband, confirmed this grant as that of lands which the
ancestors of the said Galfry held of her. Jordan fitz Alan
(de Busli), Lord of Tuxford in the time of Henry L, gave to
Galf de la Fremunt certain lands at Kirkton and Walesby,
Willoughby, Besthorpe, and the wood of Muscamp ; and these
evidently were not the Hanselin Manors sold by William,
brother of Galf de la Phremunt, to Hugh fitz Ralf de Gresley,
about the 5th year of King John. Possibly this grant will,
when worked out, throw a light upon the entry in the first great
Roll of the Pipe referred to at page 96, as the land for which
Robert de Cauz impleaded at Blith,

Hugh fitz Ralf de Gresley who acknowledged suit of service
for all these lands to Olivia, Lady of Tuxford, for his own soul
and that of Agnes, his wife, granted them to Rufford Abbey.
Both the Lady Olivia de Tuxford and Adam de Everingham
(separately) confirmed this grant.

In the Rufford Chartulary, fol. 169 b., Matilde de Cauz
describes the knight as Galfridus ' de la Freville (the name
used by Gilbert de Norfolk, whom Emma de Belfou married).

2. — Daniel de Creveceur held one and half fees,

3. — The wife of Robert de Arch held two fees.

Note. — The family of de Arches held Grove of Roger de Busli
and his successors, but little is known of them. One Robert
held the estate at Domesday ; and Gerbert de Arches, tetnpe
Henry H. The co-heirs of Arches, married Herecy and Rufus,
and the heir of the last Eustace de Mortain, whose name and
family are frequently found in Derbyshire records. The Herecys
remained established for twelve generations, when Humphrey
de Herecy, by Elizabeth, daughter of Sir John Digby, knight,
left eight daughters and co-heirs, one of whom married Nicolas
Denman, who succeeded to certain of his estates near Retford,
and who was doubtless the ancestor of the great Lord Denman
— the upright and independent Lord Chief Justice of the King's
Bench — one of the great men of whom Derbyshire may be justly
proud.

/^—Jordan de Chevercourt held one fee.

Note. — He was the son of Ralf de Chevercourt, of Carlton,
in Lindric. He paid his relief for one fee there 11 Henry H.,

336 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

and is supposed to have been the grandson of Turold, the
Domesday holder. Jordan de Chevercourt married the daughter
of Ranulf fitz Ingelram, of Alfreton, whose great*niece married
the son of Robert de Chaucis, of Mamham. Isabella, one of
the daughters, and co -heiress of Jordan of Chevercourt, married
Robert Furneus, of Beighton, and was ancester of the family
of that place, whose ultimate heiress married Fitz Hugh of
Ravens worth. Letice, another daughter, married Ranulf New-
march ; Mabel, a third, Ralf de St. George ; Aubrea, Robert de
St. Quinten.

5. — Thomas de Muscamp held one fee.

Note. — This was doubtless the ancestor of Thomas de Mus-
camp of North Muscamp and Carlton, who held them for one
knight's fee of Robert de Everingham. The Muscamp pedigree
is a very ancient one, but much confused on account of the
divisions in their properties.

6. — Robert de Daniel held one fee.

Note. — Little seems to be known of this knight. A family of
the name of Daniel or Daynet, were of Walkingham in this reign,
Matilde Daynet or Daniel claiming the advowson in right of *
her ancestor against the Prior of Worksop, in 4 Ed. I. A great
part of this parish belonged to Newstead Priory, and one of
their properties gave rise to a curious decision — that a bastard
could not, in law, be a vilain, because, presumably, a vilain must
be a nativus of the lord. Throsby could find nothing in the
place "suitable to the cravings of a hungry antiquary" (It
seemed that he *'craved" oh horseback), unless it was *' the azure
limbs of certain naiads who ceased to lave them in the wave,"
whilst " the rosy band of smiles and loves going hand in hand,
the Graces danced." All this, with much more of the sort,
he beautifully describes in poetry. As he did so little for
Thoroton as an antiquary, it is fortunate that something can
be said in his praise as a Poetaster.

7. — Ralf de Hamerivych held one knight s fee,

8. — Ralf fil Geremund held half a knights fee.

This half fee was in Oxcroft and Alvaston, in Derbyshire.
His descendants granted them to Dale Abbey. (See Note to
Hubert fitz Ralf)

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

337

91 — Robert de St. Peter held half a fee,

10 and 1 1. — Ralf de Clapole and Rolf de Budington held one
fee,

Galf de Clapole attested the charter of Hugh fitz Ralf at
Bingham, of land in Sibthorpe to Wm. fil Wm. de Selston, the
first year after the election of de Langham to York.

12. — Robert de Bellocampo held half a fee,

KNIGHTS' FEES OF THE NEW FEOFFMENT.
13. — Galf de Lefremunt held one fee, (See No. i.)

14. — Galf de Cauz held half a fee.

It is not clear where this lay. The author's index to Thoroton
produces noGalfry ; but Lysons gives aknight of this name, who
is probably the same who held Bradborne under the Ferrars
family, who in King John's reign gave the church to Dunstable,
and conveyed the land to Godard de Brabourne. The name
seems to have been spelt Caws and de Cancels, exactly as the
Chaworth family at this period spelt their name.

1 5. — Richard Ursel held half a fee.

In II Henry II. Robert Ursel answered for the debt of his
lord, probably as senescal.

16. — AliZy sister of Robert de Cauz, held half a fee.
Unless this lady is Alice de Curci. wife of Warin fil Gerald,
nothing is known of her ; but that is hardly likely, since she
was, by one account, in her minority quite a dozen years later.
It is very unusual to find a female holding a knight's fee, and
this is the only instance in Derbyshire Rolls, except the case
of the widow of Robert de Arch.

And in his own demesne Robert de Cauz held i fee.

LIST OF TENANTS

3. — Arch, widow of Robert.
12. — Bellocampo, Robert,
II. — Budington, Ralf.
14 — Cauz, Galf.
16. — Aliz, sister of Robert

4. — Chevercourt, Jordan.
10. — Claypole, Ralf.

2. — Creveceur, Daniel.

OF ROBERT DE CAUZ.

6. — Daniel, Robt

I & 13. — Fremunt, Galf de

la.
8. — Geremund, Ralf fil.
7. — Hamerwych, Ralf.
5. — Muscamp, Thomas.
9. — St Peter, Robert.
15. — Ursel, Richard.

338

CHAPTER IX.

flo* 6*— Carta t>ubcrt fit3 1?alt

THE BARONY OF HUBERT FITZ RALF.

It may appear presumptuous to brush away summarily all that
has hitherto passed current as history of the family of this
baron ; but, as in many other instances, a strict adherence to
truth renders it absolutely necessary. The Derbyshire historians,
as they have done in the case of Robert fitz Ranulf, the sheriff,
have mistaken the family of this baron, and here they have con-
fused it with his mother s. It has always been confidently asserted
that he was a member of the family of Rye, and proof has been
offered in the shape of a strong inference which arises, it was
supposed, from the fact that Hubert fitz Ralf of the Red Book
bore much the same names (though the order is reversed), and
held part of the same manors as the Domesday holder, and this
fact has been supplemented by another equally as unsatisfactory
and illusory — namely, that a branch of the Ryes, to which great
family undoubtedly the Domesday Ralf fitz Hubert belonged,
was settled in the Domesday Rye manor of Barlbro', and that
they in the reign of Edward III. proved on a quo wawanto that
their ancestors had held a park therein from time immemorial.
Strong facts admittedly, and perhaps far more valuable as proof
than those which supports a very large number of the pedigrees
which adorn Burke's Pedigree ; but, alas, both these inferential
proofs are misleading, and both have absolutely no foundation
to support the inferences built upon them.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 339

The best account of the pedigree, as representing the views
of Derbyshire historians, is to be found in the works of that
eminent Norfolk historian, Mr. Walter Rye. As Derbyshire is
somewhat out of his range, he evidently took the matter upon
trust He writes (ps^e 5, of " An Account of the Family of
Rye) : — *' Ralf de Rye (alias fitz Hubert) was the father of
Ralf fitz Ralf, Baron of Crich temfie Henry I., who, by his
wife Matilde, afterwards a Nun at Thurgarton, had (besides
two daughters, one of whom married Geoffry de Constantine,
and the other, Juliana, married Peter de Wakebridge [this
latter is an obvious mistake for a marriage of the daughter of
Hubert fitz Ralf, grand-daughter of Matilde]) a son, Hubert
fitz Ralf, Baron of Crich, who died about 3 Henry HI., having
first married Edelina, daughter of William fitz Ralf, of Alward-
deston (of a totally different family), and secondly Sara ; he
died without male issue, leaving his daughters his co-heiresses."

"So ended the senior male line of the Derbyshire Ryes.
But a junior branch was long settled at Whitwell, which
was one of the manors Ralf de Rye held when Domesday was
taken."

It may be best to get rid of the latter statement at once.
Now, the Placita de Quo Warranto, which Mr. Rye quotes, does
not prove, as he has taken for granted it did, that the ancestors
of Ranulf de Rye, in the male line, ever held this manor, much
less from time immemorial ; and it is perfectly clear from
several suits in the Rot Cur. Regis., and from other documents,
that this park and manor were held by Robert de Meynel,
descended from a Domesday tenant of Ralf fitz Hubert, and a
knight of Hubert fitz Ralf of the Red Book, who died, leaving
an only daughter, Isabella, some time in the reign of Richard I.
The Pipe Roll of the 6th of that king shows that Sewell fil
Henry, who married her, accounted for fifty marcs that he
might have the custody of the daughters of Robert de Meynil
(her grandfather), with their lands. This lady died s. p.,
leaving her aunts, the two daughters married to Matthew de
Hathersage and* Adam de Credling, her co-heirs. The Pipe
Roll of 12 Henry III. shows that Mathew de Haversegg and
Alicia de Credling paid 200 marcs for having seizin of the land
which was Isabella de Meisnil's, consanguineous of the said
Mathew and Alicia, which they held of the king in capite.

340 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

Now, it appears from the Rotuli Curiae Regis, that Half de
Rye who held this manor at the time of the Quo Warranto,
before mentioned, obtained his share of it by marriage with
the heiress of Credling, and it was his ancestors, the Meynils,
who had enjoyed it from time immemorial. He himself, indeed,
was not a Derbyshire, but a Lincolnshire, man, most probably
of the family of the Domesday holder of the manor, but settled
at Gosberchurch, in that county, from time immemorial. In
fact, the union of the names was a pure accident And it is
also a fact that Hubert fitz Ralf derived his barony through
his mother, and not through any Ralf fitz Ralf, Baron of Crich
of the time of Henry I. This is clear beyond dispute from
several charters in the Cartulary of RufTord Abbey, which still
remain there. A copy is to be found in the British Museum.
The Thurgarton Cartulary (Bodleian Library) shows that
Hubert fitz Ralfs father was a benefactor of that foundation
tempe Henry L, and that his mother, Matilde, afterwards took
the veil there, when Hubert fitz Ralf himself gave, with her/
the land which William fitz Gregory held in ScarclifT; and
that Cartulary also shows that Hubert fitz Ralf called Robert
Deincourt (a younger son of the founder) his brother, a fact
which has always puzzled genealogists. The RufTord Cartulary
explains this. It appears that Matilde (Hubert fitz Ralfs
mother) was herself a co-heiress of Ralf fitz Hubert of
Domesday (daughter or grand-daughter does not appear), and
that she gave lands out of ScarclifT to Rufford Abbey for the
good of the souls of Hubert, her son, and of Ralf fitz Eudo,
her lord ; and the charter shows that this was a certain
portion of her land (quendam porcionem terre mee) in Scarclive
and in Languard, and that she made the donation in the
name of Hubert, her son, and from him, for whoever would
be her heir (faciam concedere et dare a filio meo Hubert, et
ab eo quodcunc erit heres meus). Very clear words to show
that it was her inheritance. The only puzzle is with regard
to the word Languard. This must mean Langwith, which
adjoined ScarclifT. If it refers to Langar, it will be found
that the Deincourts held lands there, but that she had no estate
in them. This charter was confirmed by another granted by
Ralf de Aincourt and the Lady Matilde, his wife, for the soul
of Ralf fil Edonis, and for the health of Hubert, his son, of

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 341

•

the same land, with precisely the same boundaries, but with
no mention of Languar.

This charter distinctly shows that Hubert fitz Ralf was not
the son of Ralf Deincourt, and if Robert Deincourt was his
brother, he must have been Matilde de Rye's son, as was
probably the case, by her second husband.

A third charter, by Geoffry de Constantine, confirms the same
grant. A fourth, by Ralf Deincourt, confirms a grant by Robert
Avenel out of the same place, and to this Hubert fil Ralf fil
Eudonis, the baron of the Red. Book, is a witness, or perhaps his
father (the dates prove that there must have been two Huberts in
succession). It is, then, abundantly clear that if there ever was
a Ralf fitz Ralf of the time of Henry I., Lord of Crich, he
must have been the father of Matilde de Rye, though in all
probability it was Ralf fitz Eudo, her husband, who was so
Indicated, and who was dead before 11 26, the alleged, date of
the foundation of Thurgarton Priory — a date which, fortunately,
relieves Hubert from the stigma put upon this family by Dugdale
and Madden, of identity with the thief who was hung by the
partisans of the Empress at Devizes, an identity, however,
which Mr. Walter Rye has clearly disproved. The only
puzzling fact which arises from these circumstances is the
date of these grants. The Pipe Rolls show that Hubert fitz
Ralf was an infant as late as 14 Henry H., whereas the
charters of the Deincourts concerning Scarclive, which were dated
before 11 26, were attested by him, from which it is certain that
there were at least two Hubert fitz Ralfs in succession, and
that the baron of the Red Book was not the survivor of
the reign of Henry HI., but his father.

The question now arises whether this Ralf fitz Eudo was a
cousin of his bride, and himself a Rye, or whether he was of a
different family. This is by no means an easy matter to
determine. At first sight it appears very probable that Ralf
fitz Eudo of the time of Henry I. was of the same family of
Ralf fitz Hubert (or Eudo, these names being probably
synonymous) of the time of Domesday. At any rate it is more
probable than the supposition which has so long passed current
in history, that Hubert fitz Ralf was so descended. I cannot
but fear that Ralf fitz Ralf was an invention to bridge over
the difficulty ; but there was another great family at this period

342 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

in Lincolnshire called fitz Eudo, from whom it is more probable
that he was descended. This family were the ancestors of
the lords of Tatershall, and were distinguished by the sobriquet
of de Brito, no doubt adopted, as both were great Lincolnshire
lords, to prevent confusion between them and the Ryes of
Lincolnshire, the latter being a Norman family.

Following up this clue, the first we hear of the Britos in
Derbyshire is in the year 1102, at the foundation of the Lenton
Priory, when Roger de Brito, a knight of Wm. Peverel's, gave
certain tithes in Walton and Calow, which he then held in fee-
farm of the king. Now, this foundation was benefited by
Odo de Boney, who attested it next after Hugh de Buron, and
who was undoubtedly the son of Ralf fitz Hubert of Domesday.

Next we meet with a Ralf Brito of Annesley, who shortly
prior to 1161 founded the Priory of Felly, and endowed it with
the church of Annesley. The date shows that he could not
have been the husband of Matilda de Rye, for he died before
1 126; but he may have been his son by a previous wife.
When this foundation took place does not appear, nor is the
foundation charter known to be in existence. The strong
probability is that it has disappeared for ages, and that
the delay in confirming this grant by the Pope, if this
Ralf de Annesly was the son of the husband of, Matilda de
Rye, arises from the fact that Hubert fitz Ralf their son, or
probably his nephew, was yet an infant. This foundation
was carved out of Matilda de Rye*s Barony, and she must have
been a party to its confirmation. In the account given
by Thoroton it is stated that Ralf Brito made this foundation
with the consent of his heirs, and afterwards it was granted
by Ralf Brito, and Reginald de Anesley, his son, to Worksop.
This part of the Rye Barony remained for centuries in the
Anesley family, although for a time the Stutevilles, who suc-
ceeded to this portion of it, aflfected to confirm their grants.
It would not seem that Hubert fitz Ralf himself very greatly
favoured this foundation, for he only gave it a ^small rent,
but the Pleslies, the Herizs, Barres, Insulas, and other great
tenants of the fitz Hubert Barony, all supported it, and so did
the Britos of Walton and Chesterfield, which tends to show
the connection between the two Brito families.

It is difficult to understand why this estate did not follow

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 343

the rest of the fitz Hubert Barony, and it can only be accounted
for by the supposition that Ralf, father of Reginald de Anesley,
was a son of Ralf fitz Eudo (Matilda de Rye's husband) by
an earlier marriage, and that this was given to him with her
assent, and this was done in the reign of Henry I. The alleged
Warsop grant being probably dated wrongly : looking at the
dates, it is not very wonderful that all proof of the transaction
is lost, and that we can only depend upon the mode of the
devolution of the estates.

Derbyshire historians have always assumed that the fitz Ralfs
were the male issue of Ralf fitz Hubert, whilst others (amongst
them the learned Robert Eyton, the historian of Shropshire),
have doubted whether he left any sons. The history of Lenton
shows they were all in error upon this point, for one Odo or
Eudo de Boney gave the church of Barton, half the church of
Attenborough, and two parts of the tithes in Boney and Brad-
mere to Lenton Priory, the foundation charter of which he
attested, as was before noticed. As this was within fifteen
years of Domesday, Eudo or Odo, who was thus disposing of
part of the fitz Herbert Barony, must have been the successor,
and in all probability was the son of Ralf fitz Hubert of that date.
The reason why he only disposed of half of Attenborough was
that it was all his ancestor enjoyed, Wm. Peverel owning the
other half. Very shortly after this grant, Edward, and ^Elis his
wife, confirmed to Lenton what their ancestor Odo gave. This
charter was attested by Ralf Barre Rauulf de Insula, and Hugh
de Boney, and Ralf his son. It is confidently submitted that
this Hugh and Ralf were also fitz Eudos, possibly Odo's
brother and nephew, but almost certainly the latter was husband
of Matilde, the sister qf Odo, whose sister Matilde (possibly
Aelis) was also the mother of the Edward who confirmed the
charter of Odo. It is very easy to see why Ralf, the husband
of Matilde de Rye, joined in this grant, for it remained her
share of the Barony ; nor is it difficult to discover why Edward
and Aelis confirmed the grant. There cannot be a shadow of
doubt that this Edward and ^Elis were of Saleby and Gunby
in Lincolnshire, where they held part of the fitz Hubert Barony.
We learn this from the Lady's Roll of 33 Henry II., when
Leonia de Raimes, the widow of Robert de Stuteville, was then
in the king's gift, heir to this inheritance, and stated to be upon

344 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

her father's side a descendant of Edward of Salebir, and upon
her mother's an heiress of the family of de Reimes, from whom
she inherited the manor of Diham in Essex. She evidently
thought her mother's family of greater honour than her father's,
for, although an heiress of both, and chiefly through her father,
she adopted her mother's name as her own. Her mother was
the Aelis of the charter concerning Boney, and it is more than
probable, she was the sister of Odo de Boney and his co-heir.
It appears, however, that this is a disputed point, for Roger
Dodsworth has left a pedigree of the family showing that
Edward de Salebir was not the despised person represented, but
was no other than the great Edward de Salisbury, the Sheriff
of Wiltshire, whose only positively known children were Walter
of Salisbury, who succeeded him, and Maud, who married the
great Humphrey de Bohun, certainly not a connection that one
would expect to be ignored for the sake of claiming a descent
from an unknown scion of the house of Keimes. Now it is
tolerably clear that Edward of Salisbury was living in 1119, for
he carried the Royal Standard at the great battle of Bremule,
between Henry, King of England, and Louis, King of France,
and Ordericus, speaking of him, says : " His approved integrity
was of high renown, and never failed him even when
fighting to the death," evidently pointing, not to a younger
son, but to one of a long and well-tried career. He is again
mentioned as amongst those who le.ft the Blanch Nef after
she had started on her last and fatal voyage, his age, no doubt,
precluding him from willingly remaining with the drunken and
riotous youths upon her. Now this was unquestionably the
sheriff of Salisbury, and could have been no younger son,
for the honour of carrying the standard in battle was of the
highest, and if the first Earl of Salisbury was dead, his son
Walter would have succeeded to the honour. Yet Mr. Chester
Waters, and those who adopt his views assert, though without a
shadow of proof, that there were two Edward de Salisbury's, and
that the great Edward died in the time of William Rufus, an
assumption that is absolutely essential to his argument. The
author was recently involved in a rather too exciting corres-
pondence upon this point in the pages of the " Academy," by
Mr. Chester Waters, who challenged, not to say derided, the
author's views upon the question, but that eminent scholar was

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 345

unable to meet the obvious retort that he had dimidiated
the real Edward of Salisbury to enable Roger Dodsworth's
theory to fit in with the dates, for it isr impossible that^^Matilde
de Rye (not the before-mentioned Matilde, but her sister) could
be a second wife of the Sheriff of Salisbury, if he was the hero
of Bremule, because that lady, prior to 1 107, was the wife of
Hasculf de Taney, by whom she had two sons, Rainold or Ralf,
the elder (who is lost to history), and Graelent, who, this Red-
book shows, held two fees of Hubert fitz Ralf of the old
feoffment, that is, he or his ancestor was enfeoffed before the
death of Henry I. If this was the first husband of the co-heir
of Rye, these sons would be the lords, not the tenants of , Hubert
fitz Ralf, or, at least, would precede Leonia de Reimes in her
share of the inheritance. The heiress of Reimes (Leonia's
mother) married a second time in 11 30, Pagan fil William de
Hocton, by whom she had two daughters and co-heirs, who
apparently ought to have shared in the inheritance of Diham.
One of whom, Matilda, was first the wife of Richard Grunbald,
Justiciar of England, and secondly, of Rich de la Peck; and
the other (Emma) married Ernald de Bosco.

It should be noted that whilst Mr. Eyton apparently adopts
the Salisbury pedigree propounded by Dodsworth, he doubts
the accuracy of Mr. Chester Waters* statement dimidating that
sheriff, and adds this note to his copy of it, " so says Waters."
The real pedigree of the Salebir family is in great obscurity.
That the name is Salebir, and not Salisbury, as recorded in the
Lady's Roll, is tolerably clear from an entry in the Rot. Cur.
Regis concerning it.

Saleby was not an uncommon name in Lincolnshire, probably
it was a form of the name Saltfleetby, which is still called Salleby.
Philip de Kim, who was sheriff of Lincolnshire, 1169. granted
land in Suaby to Robert de Saleby. There was*about the same
time a Hugh and a Roger de Saleby, and very curiously the
surname of this family was also fitz Eudo. It would appear that
two members of the fitz Eudo family married the two co-
heiresses of Rye, not an unlikely circumstance, since they were
all located in Lincolnshire:

It is a curious fact, established beyond doubt, that for some

reason neither the daughters of Ralf fitz Hubert, nor their

descendants, enjoyed the fitz Hubert barony during the life
24

346 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

of Henry I. This is clear from the first great Roll of the Pipe,
which shows that it was then in the king's hands, and let to fee
farm to several of the tenants, Gilbert de Mesnil, Ralf de
Barre, and Robert le Lusors. The estate was then described
as late of Odo fitz Ralf, who must have been the donor of
Lenton priory.

Hubert fitz Ralf, after serving the king in the army abroad
(he was with King Richard's army several years), became mad,
and was aided by his relatives (so far as they could manage it)
in squandering his inheritance. There is a curious record of a suit
brought by the Attorney-General against Brian de Insula, who
obtained a large portion of his estate. The Chartulary of
Newstead, fol. 138 b., now at Heralds' College, has preserved
evidence of the transaction in a charter from Hubert, granting
all his interest in Scarcliff, Palterton, Langwath, and Risle,
except what he had given to Anker de Freschville with Juliana,
his daughter. Brian de Insula pleaded his charter in answer to
the Attorney-General, who replied that Hubert fitz Ralf was
non compos mentis, and that, by the king's command, there had
been hue and cry to prevent any one from dealing with his
inheritance. Brian de Insula was a judge, and in spite of this
he seems to have won his suit, for he left these estates to his heir.

Brian de Lisle was closely' connected with the fitz Hubert
family. He was the son of Robert de Insula of Kirkby, a
descendant of that Reginald who attested the fitz Hubert
charter to Lenton. The de Lisles of Grace Dieu, according to
Burke, claim him as a relation, but they were a distinct family.
The connection with the Ryes is a very old one. Robert de
Insula appears to have married a daughter of Berenger Todeni,
the brother of Agnes, who married Henry de Rye, or, at all
events, as the Lincolnshire Roll of 1 1 14 shows, he succeeded
to many Todeni manors ; and Brian was also allied by mar-
riage. For his second wife he married Gracia, the daughter and
heiress of Thomas de Saleby, of Gunby in Lincolnshire, and with
her enjoyed part of the fitz Hubert inheritance. (If Edward
was of the Salisbury family, how was this Thomas allied to
them ?) We learn from Anker de Freschville's charters several
facts which may eventually throw a strong light upon the
history of the fitz Eudo family. It appears that no partition
took place between the co-heirs of Ralf fitz Hubert of Domes-

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 347

day until the 33 Henry II., and that prior to this period those
heirs had been allowed without partition to enjoy several por-
tions of it. Probably there were two fitz Ralfs, and one was
a minor, and it happened that they had each held certain
portions which ultimately on partition were assigned to the
other co-heirs ; but this was not always the case, and it would
seem that Alwodeston, near Derby, was enjoyed by the fitz
Ralfs, and subsequently it came to the Freschvilles. Ralf
Freschville, in confirming the grants of Hubert fitz Ralf to
Derby, confirmed those of WiUiam fitz Ralf and of Robert
his son, of the advowson of St Michael's in Derby, and the
chapel of Alwoldeston.

Domesday, as we have seen, shows that Ralf (fitz Eudo?)
held Newton, Crich, and Scotchtorp of Ralf fitz Hubert at
Domesday, but this family of fitz Ralf were quite distinct
from that of Wm. fitz Ralf, the Norman Justiciary. Various
conjectures have been made respecting this family of Wm.
fitz Ralf, which require to be cleared up. It seems tolerably
certain that Hubert fitz Ralf married and endowered his
daughter Eveline, for he confirmed her grants to that foun-
dation, though possibly they may have been made out of her
own dowry. William fitz Ralf, her father, in some way v/as
permitted to interfere with the inheritance of fitz Hubert, and
to make grants out of it, but so did Ralf fitz Stephen, the
king's chamberlain, who in 14 Henry II, would appear to
have had the custody of Hubert fitz Ralfs inheritance. (See
the Pipe Roll for that year.) It may be conjectured that both
of them were descended maternally from the Rye family.

This William fitz Ralf of Alwoldeston may have been that
person described as William fitz Eudo de Hibaldeston, to whom
William de Lancelin, according to the Rufford Cartulary, gave
a bovat of land in Walesby in free marriage with Cecilia his
daughter. This William Lancelin was the son of Azelin
Goisfred, Hanselin's great tenant John and William de la
Chause, who, doubtless, were relatives of Ralf fitz Stephen's
wife, were tenants of the same place.

St. Michael's, Derby, was acknowledged to be the mother
church of Alvaston in a suit tried in the reign of King John,
and again tempe Henry VII., and William fitz Ralf, the Sheriff
of Derby and Justiciar of Normandy, who dealt with it.

348 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

seems to have disposed of it in favour of his daughter Matilde,
the wife of Geoffrey de Salicosa Mara, for she gave the manor
of Alvaston to Dale Abbey.

In a Roll of the Curia Regis (no date), one Isabella of
Alwoldeston claimed two bovates of land in that manor
against Galf de Salicosamara and Isabella fil Galfry. Nothing
appears to be known of her family.

In Rot. Cur. Regis, No. 70, m. 4 (no date, but c. John),
there is an Assize to determine whether the Abbot of Rufford
disseized William fil Robert, Wm. fil Eudo, and Gaufry fil
Ascelin, of common of pasture in Grimston-cum-Welhag, which
he had of the barony of Robert de Cundy, and Gilbert de
Gant Soc of Welhag was to be found in Grimston, Walesby,
and other places, but Welhag is not mentioned in Domesday,
probably Gilbert de Gant granted it to Rufford as part of
Cratele.

In the time of Stephen, Gilbert de Gant made a grant to
Rufford, reserving to himself the services of Hugh and Ralf,
sons of Ralf fitz Remigius. Possibly this was Hugo fitz Ralf,
who gave land which he purchased of Galf de la Fremont in
Walesby, to Rufford, which Olive Montebegonis, daughter of
Jordan fil Alan of Tuxford, confirmed.

This Hugh fitz Ralf was one of the barons who rose against
King John. He married and obtained a great inheritance with
Agnes, daughter and co-heir of Ralf de Gresley, by Isabella,
daughter of Robert de Muscamp, a descendant of the senescal
of the earl. More concerning him will be found in a note to
Gresley and Wandesley.

There was a family of fitz Ralf at Wessington in Sallow,
resident there tempe Henry II., and earlier, which puzzles
exceedingly. They are only known by a series of Charters
which are now at Belvoir Castle, Derbyshire records containing
no mention of them.

Wessington and Oggeston were at Domesday divided between
Walter de Aincourt and Ralf fitz Hubert.

Odo fitz Ralf gave Wessington to Darley Abbey, and Geoffry
de Constantine confirmed it Now Darley Abbey was only
founded in the reign of Stephen, or very early in the reign of
Henry II., and although the names Odo, Hubert, and Eudo are
all the same, this Odo cannot be confounded with Hubert fitz

. THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 349

Ralf) who was an infant till the latter part of it, nor could he
have been the donor of Lenton Priory, who was then dead. He
was possibly the father of Hubert fitz Ralf II., of whom nothing
is known.

The church of Crich was given to Darley by the Earl of
Ferrars. By what right he possessed it it is difficult to see.
It is, however, situated in no less than three wapentakes, and
therefore its history is involved, and we may have but little of it
Portions may have belonged to different lords. Wessington was
held (how does not appear) by the Abbot of Darley under John
de Heriz in the reign of Exiward I., whilst some of the family
of Fitz Ralf continued under-tenants of the Abbey.

At Bel voir Castle is a Charter, s. d. of Ralf fil Simon to Darley
Abbey, granting land in Wistanton and the land of Agenel,
which Galfred Rural held, to which Robert de Oggeston was
witness. It is sealed with a bird having its wings raised. This
Ralf fitz Simon seems to have married Mabilia, the widow of
Ivo de Heriz. She released her dower to John de Heriz in 10
Henry III.

27th Henry III. there is a Charter between Ralf fil -Ralf of
Wistanton and Mabilia, the widow of Ralf fitz Simon, and
another Charter of the same to Darley Abbey, granting certain
land, some of which was held by Mabilia, widow of Ralf, his
father, in dower. To this Charter were the following witnesses :
Robert de Esseburn, Robert le Vavasor, and Fulcher de
Urtona, knights ; Roger de Thoc, Peter de Ulkerthorpe, Robt.
Artheyk, Robt de Oggeston, Walter de Merl, Will de Ley,
Roger Clico, and Alex, de Lowe.

Then there is a Charter of Matilda, widow of Ralf fil Ralf de
Wistanton, and another of 13 Henry III. of Robert fil Ralf of
Winfield, which latter was attested by William de Glapweil and
William de Normanton.

Henry fil John de Heriz confirmed to Walter, Abbot of
Darley (1247-59), the land which they held of Ralf fil Ralf of
Wistanton.

Walter, Abbot of Darley, according to the Derby Chartulary
(Cotton. Lib. Titus C. x., fo. 39), granted to William fil Robert de
Oggeston the land which Robert held of Ralf fil Ralf of Wistan-
ton. This Robert was a Brito of Walton.

The same Cartulary contains a Charter of Simon fil Richard

350 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

(probably Ralf fil Simons' grandfather) granting to Magister
Robert de Derby the land which Henry, his brother, held of him
in Oggeston. Ralf, Abbot of Darley (1229-47) with the assent
of the convent, conveyed to Robert fil Robert de Walton
(Brito) and Cecilia, fil Magister Robert de Derby, for his
homage and service, the whole land of Oggeston (Eggedeston)
which the same Robert held of Ralf fil Ealf de Winstanton, to
hold to the said Robert and Cecilia and their heirs, etc

58 b. Magister Robert fil Gode being sick, gave half the mill
of Derby to the Abbey of Darley. This was in 1 176.

Fo. 58. King Henry II. confirmed the grant of Wachelin of
Derby, and Goda, his wife, of the mill in Derby, which he
bought of William de Heriz, and the grant of Ralf fitz Stephen
and Hubert fitz Ralf of Childwell, Pentrice, and Crich. This
William de Heriz, with Robert de Heriz and Wacheline and
Goda de Derby gave Thurlecroft to the Abbey. This must
have been prior to 23 Henry II., since William de Heriz died
that year.

Fo. 88. Letitia fil Nigel fil Baldwin de Derby confirmed the
land, which Hugo fil Ralf gave with his daughter.

Fo. no. Ralf fitz Stephen gave Pentrice, Ripley, and Ulker-
thorpe, which he held of Hubert fitz Ralf.

Fo. 132. Robert de Oggeston fil Robert de Walton gave 8
marks to Dno Ralf de Esseburn. He married a daughter of
Magister Robert of Derby, and held land of Ralf fil Ralf of
Wessington.
Fo. 148. ,Wm. fil Ralf gave the mill of Alwoldeston.
Robert fil Wm., the chapel of the .same place.
Edeline fil William fil Ralf, land in Bolton, which Peter fil
Roger gave to the canons.

Amelia, another daughter, land which Roger fil Reginald held.
Hubert fitz Ralf gave land in Childwell, Pentric, Ripley, and
Ulkerthorpe, which his father gave, and Ralf fitz Stephen
afterwards allowed (concessit). Walter, Bishop of Coventry,
confirmed the grant of Ralf fil Odo and Gaufry de Constantine,
made with the assent of Earl Ferrars, of Crich, Lea, Dethic, Ibol,
Saunessey, Wessington, and Oggeston, and Salthorn to the
same foundation.

To add a few Charters from Belvoir, possibly of value to the
point, but certainly of great genealogical interest.

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 35 1

In 127s there is a Charter of John de Heriz and Henry,
Abbot of Darley, concerning^ Wistanton, attested by William de
Oggeston. The seal of Heriz : two lions.

Another of William, Abbot of Darley, to Ralf fil Henry Hert
of Crich.

Hugo de Heriz de Grava to Robert fil Richard de Retford,
vicar, and William fil Ralf, his kinsman.

John fil Galf de Plastow to the Abbot of Darley, 4s. rent from
land in Aginhale in Wistanton, which Peter, his brother, held.

T. Ralf de Wistanton, Peter de Ulkerthorpe, Ranulf de
Wakebridge, William Torcard, Alex de Lowed, Will de Ley,
Jordan de Ybul.

In 1252 there is a Charter of Walter, Abbot of Darley, to
Ralf fil Ralfde Wistanton and Matilda, his wife, to which were
witnesses Ralf de Freschville, Roger de Eyncourt. Walter de
Reibof, kts. ; Walter de Ufton, Robert de Oggeston, Will his
son, Peter de Herthorpe, Ranulf de Wakebridge, John de
Plaistow.

Then there is a Charter of Walter, Abbot of Darley, to
Matilda, wo. of Ralf Wistanton, 1247-59; with two Charters of
Ralf fil Ralf de Wistanton with the abbot, which Walter de
Morley, Roger of Derby Clic, Jordan de Ybul, Wm. fil Ralfde
Normanton, Robt. fil Robert de Aldwerk, Ralf de Winefield,
Walter de Ufton, Will fil Ralf de Mston, Fulc fil Fulc de
Peton witnessed.

THESE ARE THE KNIGHTS' FEES ENFEOFFED
OF THE BARONY OF HUBERT FITZ RALF

OF THE OLD FEOFFMENT.

(It will be noticed that, unlike the other certificates, this charter
speaks in the third person, from which it would seem that the
Baron was a minor at this period, and that Ralf fitz Stephen,
the king's chamberlain, who had the custody of his inheritance
(and something more, for he presumed to make grants out of
it), made the return for him.)

I. — Robert de Meynil holds five fees.

Note. — No doubt these fees were at Barlbro', Whitewell,
Clune, Stretton, Egstow, and Hanley.

The first great Pipe Roll shows that Gilbert de Meynil then

352 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

held part of his lord's fee from the Crown at fee-farm. He
then accounted for j£i 1 2 of the old farm (that is, arrears), and
;£8o of the new. He also paid 20s. for the land of his brother,
and ten marcs for the king's license to marry. At the time of
Domesday, Robert held these same fees of Ralf fitz Hubert,
and as this lease carries the possession of the family back to
the early part of the reign of Henry I., it is most probable
(though there is no proof of it) that he was the Domesday
ancestor. There appears to be no doubt but that the tenant
here recorded was descended from Gilbert de Meynil of the
first roll of the Pipe, several charters showing that Robert fil
Robert Meynil of Barlbro' was the grandson of Gilbert. The
termination of his tenancy has already been mentioned in the
account of the family of Hubert ill Ralf.

2. — Ga// Ridel held two and a half fees.

Note. — This knight was the son of Rich. Basset, the Justiciar
of England, by the daughter of Geoffrey Ridell, who perished
in the Blanch Nef, 1 1 19, whose name he assumed, whilst his
descendants, as well as his brother, all adhered to their paternal
name. It has been pretended that the wife of Geoffry Ridal
was a daughter of Hugh, Earl of Chester, and undoubtedly she
obtained a grant of some portion of his property. It is most
probable that she was but a natural daughter, for had she been
born in wedlock she must have succeeded, instead of Hugh's
sisters issue, to that vast inheritance on the death of Earl
Richard in the year 1 1 19. He was also drowned with his wife
in the Blanch Nef. Ordericus, who gives a long account of his
father and his misdoings, distinctly states that Richard was
the only child of the late earl, although in another passage he
mentions a son Robert, who was dedicated to religion, and also
Otho, another son, tutor of the king's youngest son, but probably
they were illegitimate also. Ordericus notices that he had
several illegitimate children, and that nearly all of them came to
untimely ends. The mistake with regard to Geva Ridel has
arisen probably from the fact that in these lawless days the
stigma of illegitimacy was scarcely regarded as a bar to
inheritance, not at least by the Royal Family.

The Bassets long held the manor of Duckmanton of this
honour, which was probably the fee above-mentioned which

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 353

Goisfred (probably Ridel) held at Domesday A charter of G.
Ridel, is to be found in the Wolley Charters at the British
Museum, which shows that his and the family of de Wiverton
of Berneston were identical ; and that place, which came by
descent to the Chaworths, is now one of the seats of Mr.
Chaworth-Musters, of Annesley,

3. — Robert fit Ranulf held two fees.

Note. — This is probably the Robert fil Ralf referred to in
the charter of Hubert fitz Ralf to Dale Abbey.

4. — Gcdf Barre held two fees.

Note. — These fees were in Tiversholt and Kirkby, and, like
the Meynils, this family can claim to have almost a Domesday
pedigree, for, like them, they farmed part of the barony at the
time of the first great Roll of the Pipe. Ralf Barre then
accounted for ;£'i2 9s. 4d. of the old farm.

Goisfred held Tiversholt at Domesday, and his name, or
something like it, long continued a Christian name in this
family. He was probably the Domesday ancestor of this
family.

5. — Graelent de Taney held 2 fees.

Note. — The connection between this Essex family and the
Fitz Huberts is a very interesting one. This knight was
the second son, and probably the heir of Matilda de Rye,
sister of the mother of Hubert fitz Ralf, and therefore his first
cousin. She was Lady of Gunby, one of Ralf fitz Hubert's
Domesday manors, and by her first husband, Edward de
Salebir, she left a daughter and heiress, Leonia de Raines,
who inherited her property.

Graelent de Taney succeeded to his father's inheritance in
Essex, and at this period held j\ knights' fees in capite in
that county.

In 4 John, Ralf de Taney sued Robert de Taney for 8 bovates
of land in Barneston, which he held of the gift of Ralf, his
father. This probably constituted part of Graelent's holding.

6. — Ralf fitz Stephen holds two fees of the fee of Hubert
himself^ as he^ Hubert^ asserts.

Note. — This is a curious note to this tenure. It is stated
to be of the fee of Hubert himself, as he (Hubert) alleges ;

354 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

in fact it would appear that for some reason Ralf fitz Stephen
himself made this return. Possibly Hubert fitz Ralf was already
nan compos mentis, or he may have been in his infancy.

There can be no question but that this was Ralf fitz Stephen,
Camerarius Regis. He married, perhaps subsequently, the
heiress of Robert de Cauz, and in her right obtained part of
the barony of Geoffry Hanselin, with the forest of Nottingham.
He enjoyed these, however, but a few years, for King John
granted the Honour to him whilst Earl of Morton, and he was
dead before the fifth of his reign, for various offers of marriage
are then recorded for the estates and the person of his widow,
none of which, however, she appears to have accepted.

He appears to have been a Lincolnshire knight, and, as before
noticed, to have held estates at Snelland, Reresby, Wikenhibi,
Westladiton, and Wiberton, some of them probably of his
wife's family, the Cauzs.

The Kirkstead Chartulary mentions several Charters of his
and of Stephen, his father, Chamberlain of the King of Scotland.
He appears to have had other sons, and to have been connected
with a family named Fitz Eudo of Reresby, possibly Ralf fitz
Eudo s own family.

7. — Reginald de Amiesley held 2 fees.

Note. — These fees were of course in Annesley and Felley,
and this knight must have been the son of Ralf Brito.

He would, therefore, if that father was identical with the son
of Ralf fitz Eudo, Hubert fitz Ralf s father, be his nephew, or
perhaps his first cousin. This is not the less probable, since
we find this fee to have been of the old feoffment. It is of
course possible that the father of Reginald de Annersley was a
younger son of Matilda de Rye, as well as of Ralf fitz Eudo.
The early portion of the Annesley pedigree is in great con-
fusion, notwithstanding the great pains taken by the Heralds
to perfect it for the Viscount Chaworth. This work, which has
been most kindly lent for the perusal of the author by Mrs.
Chaworth Musters of Annesley Hall, is most valuable for the
histories of other families connected with them, particularly
that of the Bassets.

8. — Serlo de Pies lie held one fee.

Note. — This fee was Ashover. He also held Glapwell of

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 355

William Peverel, and Pleasley also, from which place he took
his surname. The latter is not mentioned in Domesday.

Ashover in the thirteenth century became divisible amongst
the heirs of Serlo, one of whom married Willoughby, and the
other Deincourt, the co-heir of the latter marrying Reresby, now
represented by Sir George Reresby Sitwell, Bart, and the other
Musters, now the ancestor of Mr. Chaworth Musters of Annes-
ley Park.

9. — Ranulf de Wandesley held one knighfs fee.

Note. — There seems to be some confusion between this
family and that of Hugh fitz Ralf, who married the heiress of
Gresley, who was also the heiress of Robert de Muscamp, and,
indeed, it would seem that that Hugh must have been the eldest
son of this Ralf, who, on account of the great inheritance he
obtained by marriage, left this smaller one to his younger
brother. Unquestionably, this knight was represented by his
ancestor in the reign of Henry I. He or his son was living here
in 22 Henry H., as we learn from the Pipe Rolls, when he paid
three marks as his quota of the forests amerciments for that
year. Thoroton says that a William de Wandeslie also paid
two marks that year.

In the I2th Henry H. Orm de Wandeslia paid ids. This is
probably a mistake for Orm de Tanesleia.

In 25 Henry II. the Sheriff accounted for small sums received
for the goods of Hereward and Hacon de Wandegley.

Ralf de Wandesley gave certain lands in Wandesley to
Felley, which Nicolas his brother afterwards confirmed.
Alexander de Wandesley succeeded, and Ralf his son suc-
ceeded him. 4 Henry III., there was a pardon granted to
Henry de Estweit for the death of Ralf fitz Ralf de Wandesley.
In 14 Henry III. the Prior of Felly brought an assize against
Nicolas de Wandesley, Alexander fitz Hubert, and others, con-
cerning certain fences. This Alexander certainly seems to be
identical with Alexander de Wandesley ; and as he was the
son of Nicolas, this name Hubert was evidently used as a
surname. This confirms the probability of the suggestion
already made, that Hugo fitz Ralf was of the family of Ralf
fitz Hubert of Domesday, and of his son Odo de Boney. We
find this Hugh fil Ralf granting rents and lands in Wandesley,

3S6 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

some twelve bovates, and twenty-four solidates of land, and
eijjhtpence rents to Stanley Priory. How could he do this
whilst the Wandesley family undoubtedly remained in possession
of their inheritance for at least fifty years afterwards, until,
indeed, in 33 Edward I., the inheritance was divided between
the co-heirs and daughters of the last Ralf de Wandesley, Joan
the wife of William de Cressy, and the wife of William Fole-
jambe of Gretton.

The Testa de Nevil states that Ranulf de Wandesley held
Selston of Robert de Stuteville, and yet prior to this Hugh
fitz Ralf had ^iven a large number of bovates out of that
place, some seven, together with a rent of 12s. which Nicolas
de Wandesley paid him, showing that he was clearly his superior
lord.

Selston had been the fee of Wm. Peverel, but Wandesley
had belonged to Ralf fitz Hubert at Domesday. We can
therefore only conclude that Alexander fitz Hubert and his
ancestors, called fitz Hugh and fitz Ralf, were the descendants
collaterally or direct of the Domesday holder. In Henry HI.'s
time, Ranulf de Wandesley, with his son Galfry, attested the
charter of Reginald de Insula.

We find Alexander de Wandesley repeatedly attesting the
charters of Robert le Vavasor of Shipley, and others, to Rufford,
and sometimes as the first witness.

It appears from a subsidy Roll that a younger branch of
the family hdd lands there in the 6th of Henry VI., in
which time there was also some of the same name settled at
Wingerworth.

Roger de Wandesley attested a charter of Robert de Tibetot's
to Thomas fil John Foljambe concerning the manor of Elton,
signing immediately after Thomas de Gretton. A copy of
this charter is now at Belvoir Castle. It is perhaps dangerous
to speculate, but the guess may be hazarded, that the family
who appeared before the Heralds on their visitation of Derby-
shire, holding a manor of this name in Darley, which at Domes-
day formed part of the king's manor of Mctesford, then called
Wandesley, are identical in origin with the Nottinghamshire
family, but the connection between them has not been dis-
covered, nor, except in the connection between the Derbyshire
family of Foljambe, who were also called de Gretton, is there

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 357

at present any trace of relationship. This, however, is quite
clear — the same family held both manors, a very remarkable
instance of a manor, at so early a period, being called after the
name of its lord, that name being also the name of his territory
in another county.

The conclusion to be drawn from this account is that the
Nottinghamshire family were identical with that of Hubert
fitz Ralf their lord^ and that the Hugh iitz Ralf who married
the heiress of Gresley was no other than the witness to
Edward de Salebir's charter to Lenton. That charter was
probably made not very early in the reign of Henry II. (he
probably survived), for we hear nothing of Robert de Stuteville,
who married his daughter and heiress, and the first we hear of
his son is in 33 Henry II., when partition was made.

10 and 1 1. — Hugo de Somery and Robert de Barton field half
a fee.

Note. — This half fee was probably in Barton.

12. — Galfry de Cotestin held \\\ knights' fees. Ten of his own
demesne of the new feoffment^ which he obtained in marriage
with the sister of Hubert, by fine made before the king.

Note. — Part of this fee was in Barton. Robert, the son of
Robert Cotestin, had an interest here in the time of Edward I.

A LIST OF THE TENANTS OF HUBERT FITZ

RALF.

7. Anesleia, Reginald.
4. Barre, Galf.

11. Barton, Robert.

12. Cotestine, Galf.
I. Meinil, Robert

8. Pleslie, Serlo.

3. Ranulf, Robert fil.
2. Ridel, Galf.
6. Stephen, Ralf fil.
10. Sumery, Hugo.
5. Taney, Graelent.
9. Wandeslie, Ranulf.

358

CHAPTER X.

no. 7.— ZTbc Cbartcr of "Ralf fits MllUam^

Ralf fil William de Walichville held in the lifetime of King
Henry I. (certain land) for the service of one knight's fee, and
Robert de Chaucis holds it by the same service, which he
obtained with the daughter of the said William, except two
carucates of land, for which the king impleaded him.

Note. — This is a most puzzling entr}', but one which, if it were
fully understood, might aid in the solution of the difficulties at-
tending the Cauz and Chaworth pedigrees. It can only be conjec-
tured that this fee was in Walesby, which may be another form
of Walichville ; and probabilities point to this Rad fil William
being a son of William Ascelin, chief tenant of Rad Anselin.
There was a Ralf of Wadeland, in Walesby, who gave to the
monks of Rufford the whole territory which John de la Chause
of Walesby, and William, his brother, and other persons, held
in Walesby. We have met with John de la Chause before,
when he was sued by Matilde, widow of Robert de Caus. He
must, therefore, have been the son of Robert de Caus, or, as
he is called here deChauces, by the daughter of William de
Hanselin, or Lancelin ; and the gifts of Rad de Wadeland to
Rufford must only have been a mere nominal sovereignty.

It is a curious circumstance that Walesby and other places
were afterwards sold to Hugo fitz Ralf, who married the heiress
of Gresley, and took her name. His origin, as we have seen, is
in doubt. He may possibly be the son of this Ralf. This,
too, would account for the puzzling charters of Matilde de Cauz

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 359

confirming the grants to Hugh fil Ralf of these same places.
(See Galfry de la Fremunt, tenant of Robert de Cauz, No. i.)
The probabilities point to this Robert de Chauces being the
ancestor of the Chaworfhs, and, if so, his connection with
Walesby will account for his allegiance to the Honour of de
Busli, and for his tenure of Marnham under that family, at the
same time drawing closer the bonds between the family of Caus
and Chaworth, a tie which is difficult to explain, and which
has not, indeed, been hitherto indicated.

This land was probably that for which the mother of William
de Curci fined in 1 1 Henry H. Unfortunately no details of
that transaction are given in the Pipe Roll. The fridbor (frank-
pledge) of Robert de Chauces answered for him in 21 Henry
n. (see Pipe Roll), and the name of William de Chaucis appears
in another Roll of 28 Henry II. This certificate may have
been given at any time between those two dates : it has hardly
the precise character of the returns made earlier in the reign of
this king.

36o

CHAPTER XI.

*tto, 8.— 3n tbc Donour of MilUam pcverel tbcrc
are eiirti? fmigbte' (eee an^ a bait

(The particulars of the Honour will be found in the Testa
de Nevil.)

36 1

CHAPTER XII.

Do. 9— ZTbe Certificate of MiUiam Bdwere.

WILIJAM BRIWERE, HALF A KNIGHT'S FEE FOR
CHESTERFIELD AND OTHER HIS FARMS.

The great importance of this return is its date, for it is
perfectly clear from the Pipe Rolls that William Briwere had
no farm including Chesterfield prior to the reign of Richard I.
In 6 John (page i66), it appears that Wilh'am Briwere then
accounted for forty marcs for having Chesterfield, according to
the tenoiir of the king's charter, which he holds concerning
them. In 7 John (page 167), William Briwere accounted for
£j^ for the farm of Chesterfield, and owed ;^i8 for the rent
of Witington ; but, it is added, this ought not to be exacted,
because it was comprised in the farm of Chesterfield ; and he
also accounted for several other farms dating from the eighth
year of King Richard, from which period he had apparently
omitted to pay his rent.

In 8 John (page 171), William Briwere is charged j[fi for
Sneinton, and jQjg for Chesterfield- Of this he paid the Lepers
of Chesterfield £6, and was excused the balance. This is how
great judges farmed the crown lands, and paid their rents.

At page 173 there is a rather unintelligible entry, which
can hardly be properly extracted from the Pipe Roll of 9 John,
but the purport is clear. The Lepers of the Hospital of St.
Leonards were receiving annually the sum of £6 in exchange
for the tolls of that town, which the king gave them when Earl
25

362 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

of Morton, and which they received by the hands of the farmers
of the town (William Briwere, as such farmer, had paid it the
previous year). Now the farmers (not the Hospital) accounted
for 20 m. for having the king's charter to that effect

In the scutage of the first year of Henry HI., Williarn Briwere
is assessed for i fee in Chesterfield ; in the 13th. Henry HI. he
is assessed at 3 fees for Chesterfield, the payment of which he
was excused, as he was in the scutage of El vain the i6th year.

In 17 Henry III. the men of Chesterfield paid 20 m. for
having the king's confirmation of the charter of Wm. Briwere,
their lord. (This was the son of the late Wm. Briwere, who had
succeeded his father, who died this year.)

The first notice we have of William Briwere is in the 6th of
Richard I. There is only one Roll prior to this year of this
reign, that of the ist of Richard, when Ralf Murdac was sheriff,
and accounted for the sum of 29s. for the fair of Chesterfield,
clear proof that William Briwere had then nothing to do with it
He was again sheriff for the first part of 6 Richard I., and possibly
for the previous years, since he answered for the old farm. 29s.
is again received for the fair of Chesterfield.

In the 7th Richard I., p. 138, William Briwere accounted for
£S for the increase or rent of Chesterfield for that year ; and
the brethren of the Hospital received 60s. on account of £6 9s.
which was assigned to them in exchange for their fair.

The scribe who always prepared the Pipe Rolls beforehand
had left the usual entry for the payment of the 29s. for the fair
which had appeared for many years, but this year it is left
blank, so that it was now clear that William Briwere had got it
out of the hands of the Lepers, and was farming it himself ; and
this must have been by virtue of the charter he recites in the
entry of 6 John, and probably at the assessment recorded by
himself in this certificate, for it agrees with no other. The
charter of 6 John grants it as a rent of ;;^79, and a subsequent
charter (see Records of Chesterfield, published for Mr. Alderman
Gee) assessed it at 3 knights' fees.

In 8 Richard I. we have a most important entry, which shows
that under Archbishop Hubert's new regulations the assessment
was greatly increased, for it is there recorded (page 141) that
Wm. Briwere accounted for jC? 17s. 3d., the remainder of the
rents for Chesterfield, etc., for the past year, and for ;^38 of the

THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER. 363

rent of Chesterfield for that year, which was assessed by himself,
the sheriff, by William Albini, and Simon de Patteshall, and by
a jury chosen by the knights of the county. It would be of
little use, however, to put in force the Archbishop's regulations
with men like William Briwere, for in the same Roll which
records his indebtedness is also recorded the fact that the king
excused his payment

There are two or three entries in the Rolls whilst William
Briwere was sheriff, which would seem to indicate that he only
farmed the town of Chesterfield for the king; or else, that,
like Derby and Nottingham, they were their own farmers. In
4 John (page 157), the men of Chesterfield paid two marcs for
license to buy and sell stained cloth, as they were accustomed
in the time of Henry II. Newark made a similar payment,
and the following year Robert fil Peter de Brimington fined
SO m. for having the manor of Witington as his father held it
by the charter of King Richard. This accounts for the
objection of William Briwere to pay (or rather be charged — he
never paid) ;^i8 rent for that manor in the 6th of King John.
This entry again shows that William Briwere's farm was later
than the commencement of King Richard's reign, Peter de
Brimington's farm being made probably in one of the years for
which there is no Pipe Roll, and certainly before that of William
Briwere. Several records of a later date show that this question
of rent between Peter de Brimington and his descendants and
the Briweres was the subject of disputes between them, though
ultimately they were compelled to pay.

Derbyshire historians have lost sight of the family of Peter
de Brimington, as indeed they have of many others equally
interesting. It is diflFicult to conjecture their origin, but they
were of great importance, and, like the families called de Duck-
manton and de Glapwell, they were almost invariably parties
to the charters of their neighbours the Britos, of Walton.
Perhaps this was only because they were neighbours ; but
looking at the importance attached to the attestation of charters
by all who might by any possibility have any title by inheri-
tance, it would seem that they were very possibly of the same
family. Many charters relating to the de Brimingtons are to
be found at Hardwick Hall, at the Foljambe's, at Osberton, and
at others of the great depositories of Derbyshire Records, which

364 THE RED BOOK OF THE EXCHEQUER.

will appear in due course in the Parochial portion of this
work.

William Briwere's certificate dates prior to the first years of
John, as the rate of assessment shows, and subsequent to the 6th
of Richard I., for that year, or the latter part of it, was the first
of his farm. This would therefore give the date of 7 or 8 Richard
I. as that of William Briwere's certificate, so that it is one of the
very latest in the Red Book ; since the following year Arch-
bishop Hubert Walters' new financial schemes came into force,
for the purposes of which, no doubt, the Red Book was prepared.
An account of this important measure of finance will be given
in the next chapter.

3^5

COLLECTIONS FOR THE HISTORY OF
NOTTINGHAM AND DERBYSHIRE.

Zbc ZcQta &e fleviL

CHAPTER XHI.

This valuable record, although fairly enough printed under
the direction of the Master of the Rolls, still requires to be
properly edited. It is, next to the Pipe Rolls, the most valuable
record we possess in proof of the state of fees in the thirteenth
century, and it covers nearly this whole period. The earliest
portions are of the date of Kings Richard and John, and the
latter of Edward I. There is, however, but a very small portion
of the latter reign.

The Editor, who, in 1833, prepared this edition for the
Master of the Rolls, took no trouble whatever to ascertain its
true date, but described it simply as a record of returns of Kings
Henry III. and Edward I. — a period of ninety years. But even
in this he was wrong, as he must have discovered if he had
merely taken the trouble to read the proofs, for there are
certain writs showing that Archbishop Hubert Walter, who
was Chancellor of Richard I. and of King John (till his death,
in 1205), took part in some portions of its composition. Some
of these are to be found at pages 72 and 377 of the printed
work. The original books, which are still at the Record Office,
give no sort of date, or indication of the meaning or object
of the work, except that, in the fly-leaf, in a handwriting

366 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

suspiciously like that of a part of the Book of Aids (of much
later date than the book itself), there is a statement that
it contains records of these reigns — a statement which seems
to have been blindly accepted and adopted without inquiry.
The learned editors also assert that they are in ignorance
who the de Nevil referred to may be: whether he was the
chancellor or a later judge. It is, however, suggested that the
book which we now possess under this name was compiled
by the latter.

In order fully to utilise this great work, the author was
therefore compelled to analyse it, and ascertain from its con-
tents its scope and meaning. And it is not a difficult task,
for here and there scattered over the volume are to be found
numerous dates ; and more than this, some of the scutages
for which it was compiled are designated by name.

The book itself indicates no account of its own history. It
is all written by the same hand, and looking at the peculiarity
of the letters, it would appear to be a compilation of the reign
of King Edward II. or III., but it is always dangerous to guess
dates from handwriting alone, for many old scribes retain the
characteristics of the handwriting of their youth, or of the
school in which they were educated, for a long period ; and
this document has rather the appearance of being written by
an old hand. Probably the true date is in the latter part ol
the reign of Edward II., and not in the first part of it.

The scribe himself evidently had lost the thread of the history
of the documents he copied, and merely set them down as he
thought they deserved attention, only dividing the groups into
counties. Now that the object of the compilation was utili-
tarian, like that of Domesday, that is, merely fiscal, is most
probable; and, with this object probably, generally the later
inquisitions are given in the first part of the several sections.
The scribe had probably certain books and numerous rolls before
him. He divided the latter into counties, and then, without
describing them sufficiently, instead of writing out each book
in succession, he cut them up into sections, and distributed
them amongst the several counties. This is greatly to be
deplored, because in some cases there will always be a doubt
as to what epoch certain inquisitions belong, though in others
they are sufficiently ear-marked.

THE TESTA DE NEVIL. 367

Fortunately, in one case he has indicated the book from
which he extracted them, by appending to each section of it
the title, the Testa de Nevil, which the whole work now
improperly bears. The date of this portion of the work, which
can be accurately ascertained, shows conclusively that it was
the work of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and, therefore,
the compiler is certainly the Chancellor of King John, who
succeeded Archbishop Hubert. Probably his predecessor's
work was incorporated with his own, and in course of time
became known under his name, for most certainly a very early
portion of the book, no doubt the earliest, is that compiled
under the authority of Archbishop Hubert fitz Walter ; and
the two writs referring to him give us an idea of the modus
operandi^ which at once disposes of all doubt as to the objects
of the compilation.

One of these writs is to be found at page 72 of the printed
work ; it is in these words : —

" To His most venerable Lord H., by the grace of God, Arch-
bishop of Canterbury, Primate of all England. The Sheriff
of Hereford and his Associates assigned for making the talliage
of carucates for Hereford. Health and Faithful service. In
obedience to your commands, to give the Serjanties of Here-
ford according to the form by your orders prescribed, we have
diligently inquired, and of each Serjanty this is the verdict"

The returns then given are very meagre, and throw no light
upon the subject, but they are undoubtedly of the year 1 198.

Another letter is still more comprehensive in its particulars,
and is to be found at page 377. It is as follows : —

" To our most excellent Lord H., by the grace of God, Arch-
bishop of Canterbury, Primate of all England, his most devout
P., Prior of Giseburn, and Ro. Arundel, Precentor of York, and
Roger Badvet, Sheriff of York, and William de Percy, Rad
Bolbec, Galf Baard, Galf de Wells, and Robert de Mayton.
Health, &c, as well due as devout, from all your servants Be
it known to your excellency that we, itinerant in the North
Riding for fixing the talliage upon the wainage of carucates
according to your commands, being detained by various
businesses in Richmondshire and Norland, could not go to the
wapentake of Pykering before Friday next after the feast of
St. Trinity ; therefore the Serjeants of the Lord the King,

368 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

holding of him by serjeanty, could not come before us sitting
in London at the day by ourselves appointed for them, that is
to say, in the octave of the close of Pentecost; and because
without their presence we were unable to certify at that day
concerning the value of their lands, and of the number of
carucates, we commanded them to be before us at London on
Sunday next before the feast of St. Barnabas."

Here, then, we see that the judges were already regularly
appointed in the circuits, and that an important part of their
duties was to fix the amounts payable by each of the king's
tenants. And this for many centuries continued to be an
invariable portion of the work of Assizes ; indeed, the very
name of Assizes is given to the itineraries of the judges, in
addition to their commissions of oyer and terminer, to designate
this very work. The name continues, though their duties as
Assizors is gone ; and curiously it is the important name of
the inquest now in use.

Professor Stubbs, the learned editor of Hoveden for the
Master of the Rolls (Mr. Riley had previously very ably edited
this work for Mr. Bohn), took great pains to obtain the returns
made in answer to the writs of Archbishop Hubert Walter, but
he failed to discover any, and lamented their utter destruction.
It is one of the curiosities of literature, that this learned editor,
who took an immensity of trouble to look for them (as his iiotes,
drawn from almost every source but the right one, evince),
should have failed to read this important document Had his
mind been directed to it, we should have had the advantage
of his great learning to illustrate it. Failing that, however, he
has, in his preface to Hoveden, given a full translation of
Hoveden's account of it, for the benefit of those (and their
name is legion) who are unable to read the Latin text. Un-
fortunately, the editors for the Master of the Rolls, unlike Mr.
Bohn s editors, who have preceded them in their work, generally
consider it to be sufficient for their purposes to give only the
Latin text, and this no doubt saves them much trouble.

The Testa de Nevil is, in some respects, more valuable than
Domesday itself, although over one hundred years later in
date, and of infinitely greater value than the Red Book, or
any of the scutages of the Pipe Rolls, for it gives, not only the
names of the manors, which the Red Book never supplies, but

"-N

THE TESTA DE NEVIL. 369

the names of the knights holding them, a combination rarely to
be found in Domesday, which is generally confined to naming
the manor and only the superior lord ; and more than this, it
frequently gives the services by which the estates were held,
and occasionally historical facts connected with the families who
held them of the greatest interest and value.

It may fairly be conceded that this portion of the book
named the Testa de Nevil is far away the oldest, but it by
'no means follows that even this portion is all of one date,
1 198. It may possibly be the case that, just as in the other
portions of the work, we find here a compilation of various
documents, some of them important inquisitions, and others
mere memoranda, of different periods.

The name Testa de Nevil throws doubt upon its antiquity.
Ralf de Nevil, whose work we have here, was Vice-Chancellor
in 12 1 3, and Chancellor from 1226 to 1244. It is probably to
the latter period that his labours with respect to these scutages
and taxes were confined, and he doubtless collected in his work
all the evidence he could find relative to the great changes
made by Archbishop Hubert There can be no doubt but that
the Archbishop's assessment was in use in his day.

In considering this question, it is important to bear in mind
what these changes were.

Through the rapacity of several generations of courtiers, and
the extravagancies of various kings, the revenues of the Crown
had become very seriously diminished. People were excused
payment of scutages on many pretences, and whilst the amount
of land under culture was continually increasing, not only had
the nominal amount of the tale diminished upon which it was
assessed at the time of the Conquest, but the value of the
rentals had considerably diminished, because of the rapid
depreciation in the value of money.

The king, therefore, determined to abandon the ancient
assessment, which, as far as we know, had existed from the
time of Domesday, and certainly the evidence of the Pipe
Rolls confirms that view, for the mode of accounting is pre-
cisely similar from the first. Probably his main object was to
get rid of the special exemptions and favours that had been
from time to time granted by the Crown. We learn the
details of the measure from Hoveden. (See Bohn*s Antiquarian

370 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Library, and the reprint under the direction of the M. R.) The
king sent througrh each county of England a clerk and a
knight (in imitation, probably, of the Conqueror's system of
the bishops sitting with lay-judges to administer justice in the
County Courts). With them were associated the sheriffs, who,
with the lawful knights (no doubt chosen for the purposes of
Parliament), were sworn to fulfil the king's business faithfully,
just as the Commons in Parliament are sworn in these days.
This tribunal was directed to cause the stewards of the barons
of the county, and the lords and bailiffs of the vills, and the
propositus with four men of the township (who might be either
free or vilane), and also two lawful knights of each hundred,
and these different officials were also to be severally sworn
faithfully and without fraud to declare how many wainages of
carucates there were in each township, how many in demesne,
how many in villanage, how many in free alms, as well those
which were held of the donors or of their heirs, to warrant or
release, as those for which the religious ought to perform
services, and upon the wainage of every carucate so assessed,
they were to put a tax of five shillings, to be paid by instal-
ments of two shillings first, and afterwards of three shillings.
We do not know what part of these regulations were abso-
lutely new, but this system was evidently intended to last as
a precedent, for four Rolls were to be made which were to
be kept respectively by the clerk, the knight, the sheriffs, and
the stewards of the barons; (possibly some of these Rolls may
still be in existence ?) The two lawful knights and the bailiffs
of each hundred accounted for the money to the sheriff, who
accounted for it to the Exchequer, as will be seen in the Pipe
Rolls. Freeholds (Libera foeda) and parish churches were
exempted from this talliage, but escheats of baronies in the
hands of the king were to be reckoned. The serjeanties of
the king, not of knight service, were also to be excused, but
nevertheless the serjeanties were to be recorded (imbreviabantur)
with the number of carucates, and the value of the land with
the names of the Serjeants ; and all Serjeants were summoned
to be in London in the octave of the close of Pentecost, to
hear and obey the commands of the king. The return for
Shropshire and Stafford would seem to give a reason for
requiring the attendance of the Serjeants. It was evidently

THE TESTA DE NEVIL. 371

intended to obtain money from them. At page 61, we find
a notice that Robert fil William, the king's forester, held by
serjeanty in Belewas certain lands, etc., worth 33s. 8d., and
he offered to the king three marks, and William WoHat who
held a virgate worth 4s., offered the king half a mark. Whether
these were intended as donations or as an increase of rent, does
not clearly appear, but in all probability it was the latter.

One of the first acts of these assessors and collectors was
to fix the standard of a carucate (and they must, for this
purpose, have met in conclave or in session), and they determined
that each carucate of wainage was henceforth to be 100 acres.
It is very easy to see in this account the procedure of the
present House of Commons, because the object of this Com-
mons house (for such it was) was chiefly fiscal, and that has
always been permitted to be the peculiar privilege and ultimately
the exclusive right of the Lower House, and at the date of
Archbishop Hubert it would seem to be, as we here see, an
administrative department, but by degrees it has increased its
jurisdiction, and now overshadows the great Council of the
nation. We find statements made by men of the type of the
members for Northampton deriding the House of Lords upon
the fact that many of its members are merely ornamental. They
should remember that its history shows that it was originally
the great Court which corrected and controlled the proceedings
of the House of Commons, and, in fact, prescribed their action,
whilst protecting them from the tyranny of the Crown ; whereas
now the chief usefulness of the House of Lords is to protect
the people from the tyranny of the Commons.

The writ already quoted, addressed to Archbishop Hubert,
shows clearly how the reform was worked out in detail.
Here is P., Prior of Gisburn, and Roger Arundel, Precentor
of York, representing the clerical portion of this judicial
body ; the sheriff of Yorkshire, in his proper capacity,
and five other knights who were associated with them upon
this enquiry, no doubt representing the lawful knights chosen
for the purpose. They describe themselves as itinerant justices
for the purpose of imposing the taliiage upon the wainage of
the carucates of the North Riding, and they explain why they
were unable to call before them in London the Serjeants of
the king holding these lands by serjeanty upon the day fixed

372 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

by the Archbishop, namely, the octave of the close of Pente-
cost, and why they were unable to certify without their presence
the value of the lands and the number of carucates ; particulars
exactly fitting the arrangements detailed by Hoveden, and
the date of this document exactly fits this scutage, for Roger
Batevent, the sheriff of Yorkshire, who helped to make it,
ceased to act in that capacity in 1199, and that of 1198 was
made for the last scutage of Richard I.

In the Pipe Roll of 9 Richard I. for Notts, and Derby, we
have recorded a similar itinerary, headed TalKage in Notting-
ham and Derby, by Wm. Briwere, Simon Bassett, and William
de Ridewar. The first was the sheriff at the time, the last the
senescal of the Earl of the County, and the other one of the
king's justices of Assize ; in fact, they were the Justices
Itinerant, who were generally chosen from amongst the great
men of the County.

The returns of the Testa de Nevil for Derbyshire and Notts,
is very difficult to verify, because the payments made under
it do not tally with the statement in the Pipe Rolls. The Pipe
Rolls generally give no account of the Serjeants, because,
although the number of ploughs and the value of the lands
was to be recorded, those Serjeants were to be excused taxation,
unless possibly something was to be squeezed out of them in
London. The only way, therefore, of ascertaining the date
of this record, is to obtain dates of various persons mentioned
from these and from other records. We can get in this way
positive proof of the date of the earliest portion of the
Derbyshire return between certain dates. It cannot be later
than 5 John, because William fil Costo of Hucknal appeared
personally, and declared that he had the falcons of the king
(the tenure of his serjeantry) then at his house. Now, the
Pipe Roll of 5 John shows that Henry Brito of Hucknal that
year paid six marcs for having the custody of the land which
was William fil Costo, and the marriage of his heir. This
record therefore brings it within six years of the year 1198,
in itself a most important fact ; but it by no means follows
that it was so late as the 5th of John, because in the inter-
mediate period the serjeanty of William fil Costo may have
been in the king's hands, and not immediately granted to
Henry Brito, and, indeed, this is recorded as a fact, though

THE TESTA DE NEVIL. 373

we are not informed for what reason the king seized them.
This h'mit would seem to be reduced to the 1st of John's
reign, by the entry relative to William fil Walkelin of
Steynesby. He was dead before the second year, for Robert
le Sauvage, who obtained his inheritance, then fined for the
marriage of his daughter lOO marcs and one palfry. This
brings it within a year of the new assessment. This knight
must not be confounded with another of the same name, who
was one of the king's hunters (venator). It does not always
follow that a person is alive because he is mentioned in the
Scutage Rolls. It frequently happens that the name is retained
in the list long after a death has changed the tenancy. Another
reason why this Roll cannot be later than 2 John, is because
William Briwere ceased to be sheriff that year, and we have
seen him acting in the matter of this talliage. That some of
it was of the reign of King John, or that it was altered in
that year would seem to follow from a passage relating to this
William Briwere. It is recorded that he held the knights* fees
of the Barony of Buron, of the gift of King John. At first
sight it might appear that this was granted during the reign
of King John; but the Pipe Rolls of 6 Richard I. show
that King John made this grant whilst he was Earl of Morton,
acting for King Richard. In 8 Richard I., William Briwere
whilst sheriff, accounted for 553. 5d. for the fees of Roger de
Buron. It is, therefore, a note added or corrected after the date
of the return.

There is a very puzzling entry with regard to Richard de
Sutton holding one fee in Sutton of the Honour of Richmond,
to which is added a note — " For which Peter de Leonibus
ought to answer." He did not obtain the Honour of Richmond
until the third or fourth year of King John ; therefore, if this
was a contemporary note, it would make the whole record of
a later date. But we have only a mere copy of this record,
and it may be that this note was an addition made after-
wards, on his accession to that Honour, made possibly by
Neville himself. Another note records that Robert de Chaucis
held one knight's fee in Marnham. We know so little of the
history of Marnham, that it is not safe to reject the date on
this ground. William de Chaucis paid three marcs in 28 Henry
II., and 20s. to the scutage of 33 Henry II. ; in 8 Richard I.

374 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

he paid a fine for license to remain in England, and he is again
assessed for the second scutage of King Richard I., and to the
third scutage in 9 Richard I. He also is assessed for the first
scutage of King John, the first year of his reign ; in 3 John
he is assessed ten marcs for one fee, and the same in 4 John ;
in 5 J(;hn he is assessed in the fourth scutage of King John.
Nowhere, up to this date, is Robert de Chaucis mentioned in
the Pipes ; but in 5 and 6 John there are charters granting
and confirming his inheritance as son of William. This portion
of the Roll is not necessarily of a later date than the year
1 198, simply because the name of William de Chaucis was
continued on the Roll at this period. No change may have
been made till long after his death — the Exchequer scribes
occasionally entered the name of the successor above the old
name. But this practice was not common till long after.

The next entry is still more puzzling, and apparently proves
that this part of the Roll was later than 2 John, for Roger
Montbegon is said to hold the Barony of Tuxford. Now, he
is recorded in the Pipe Roll of 2 John to have given 500 m.
for marrying the heiress of that barony. It may be that this
was a new payment, which had not appeared before, or it may '
have been an old charge, which, for some reason, had not
been previously entered. Indeed, we cannot date any fact
positively from the mere entry upon the Pipe Rolls unless there
are circumstances, such as that of Costo Falconer appearing
in court, entered upon the Roll itself. These entries do not
preclude the possibility of the Roll being earlier, but only that
it cannot be later than their date. The fact that changes in
the scutages were so long in being made, shows that this
assessment lasted for many years, and was only slowly corrected
on the itineraries of the Judges. As this assessment was certainly
made before 2 John, it may positively be concluded that it was
the assessment made by the Justices under the Archbishop,
Hubert Walter.

Questions of very great interest arise upon a complete
consideration of this book, which have not been satisfactorily
considered. Indeed, rash and hasty conclusions have been
arrived at with very little consideration, and evidently by
reference to the very unreliable evidence of names. There were
no scutages, say one class of writers, prior to the reign of

THE TESTA DE NEVIL. 375

Henry II., because in the previous reigns, as it is proved by
the Pipe Rolls, and even in the first portion of the reign of
that king, the Imperial necessities were supplied by the means
of Danegelt. We have an account of Danegelt in the first great
Roll of the Pipe, whether it is of the reign of Henry I. or
Stephen ; and again in the second of Henry II., and then we
have casual notices of payments for Danegelt in several years
of the last-named king, and we have no mention of scutages
until the eighth of that king, after which they are constant
It would seem, therefore, to lie upon the advocates in favour
of the difference of these modes of taxation, to show that in
the first decade of the reign of Henry II. there was a great
fiscal change, by which Danegelt was abolished and scutage
invented ; but there was clearly no such change, nor any change
of real importance till the fiscal reforms of Archbishop Hubert
Walter, in 1198. The truth seems to be that the rival factions
are quarrelling over different parts of the same question. The
Danegelt and the scutage was one and the same thing; the
Danegelt was the object for raising the tax, the scutage was
the mode of assessment At any rate, this is clear, that scutage
antedated the cessation of Danegelt, for King Henry I. had
scutage, as appears from his charter to Westminster Abbey,
freeing that foundation from all scutages and secular customs,
i,e.y dues.

Why these ta>tes are called Danegelt is not quite clear. It
may have been, and is often contended, that it was a tax raised
to pay the tribute to the conquering Danes ; but it is far more
likely that it was the regular source of revenue adopted by the
Danes when sovereign over these islands, and applied by them
for more than the three great occasions when the English
kings were entitled to it, and hence, in hatred of these exac-
tions, it was designated after them. However that may be, it
was the system which the Conqueror found existing, and which
he embodied in Domesday, and which his successors continued
till the reign of Henry II., under that name. Now, seeing that
the Normans were themselves of the Danish race, and that
Henry II. established a new dynasty derivative from them,
it is perhaps not very singular that this opprobrious name was
dropped ; yet it lingered in the minds of some of the sheriffs
till a later period, for in 8 Henry 11. we find the sheriffs of

376 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Nottingham taking the dooum of that year, partly by the name
of Danegelt and partly as a scutage ; the sheriff of Warwick
also called that donum a scutage, and so did the sheriff of
Gloucester.

It would certainly seem as if these donums were scutages
in disguise, and they were so treated in some counties strictly,
and levied at the same rate. In 4 Henry II. there was a
donum, and Nottingham paid the sum of ;f 109 2s. 3d., the
payment on account of it being j^g^ 6s. 8d., and the sum
excused ;^I5 15s. jd. This total was only i2s. gd. more than
the scutage or Danegelt of the first Roll of the Pipe, and nearly
£^ less than that of 2 Henry II. The donum of 5 Henry II.
was over £66 more, but the Danegelt and scutage of 8 Henry II.
again receded to the original figure, and was about 7s. less than
the assessment of the first great Roll of the Pipe. The aid for
marrying the king's daughter in 14 Henry II., exclusive of the
Honour of Peverel, which was in the king's hands, amounts to
;f 105, or thereabouts, again reaching the same figure, so that,
omitting the donum of 5 Henry II., an uniform rate was
observed from the first great Roll of the Pipe for the five
following scutages, and this same proportion was invariably
observed afterwards, except when the sheriff, as he frequently
did in King John's reign, overchai^ed many of the knights.
That king had no less than nine scutages in his short reign.
Henry II. had the same number, including donums, and
Henry III. had eight, if not nine. King Henry II. raised the
payment from a marc to 20s. King Richard I. maintained
it at this sum, but King John raised it to three marks per
knight's fee, and charged even four, five, and six marks per fee
in various cases, and sometimes as high as ten marks per fee.

There seems to have been no Imperial measure for the
payment of donums. They varied in many counties, a few
only, like Nottingham and Derby, giving exactly to the
scale of scutages, and some counties paying enormously in
excess, whilst others very much less. Dorset, which was
assessed at ^^228 scutage, only paid ten marcs, whilst
Yorkshire, which was only assessed at ;^i6s Danegelt, paid
over 1,000 marcs. Robert de Ross besides accounted for
900 marcs apparently on his own acftount These payments
fell chiefly on the prelates throughout the country. The

THE TESTA DE NEVII* 377

Yorkshire knights only paid ^£'189, a sum not much in excess
of their Danegelt, but the Archbishops of York and Bath
each gave j£"5oo, and the Bishops of Durham, Winchester, and
Lincoln ;^333 6s. 8d. each ; the Bishop of London (in Essex)
;ff20o ; Norwich and Worcester the same sum ; Exeter ;^ioo,
and many Abbots similar sums. It will be observed that in
each of these cases the payment made was a proportion of the
sum of ;^ 1,000, although no Bishop paid more than half; but
;f 500, the highest payment, was an enormous exaction. Perhaps
the true distinction between a donum and a scutage is, that the
former was levied without the sanction of the Great Council
of the Nation.

It may be noted here that the word serjeanties is used
with reference to the ordinary scutage, and no doubt accurately*
for it simply signified that the land was held by some service.
The use of this phrase subsequently became more restricted,
and it is by means of this restricted use that we are sometimes
enabled to date a portion of these records.

Some of the Rolls may be dated, because the return states
whether they were of the old or of the new feoffment ; this
only being required by the writ of 27 Henry III. This return
will, of course, be very similar to that for the previous year.

One of the most valuable records, although a return of the
reign of Henry III., is that of those who held lands of the
king from the time of King Henry II.

At page 131, amongst the Berks, records, is one of the
5th Henry III. in these words.

"This is the receipt of the carucates by the last Assize of
the fifth year of King Henry III., of the land with the baronies
knights* fees, and free tenancies, and others, assized, except as
to ecclesiastical fees, by the hands of Henry de Sccio, sheriff
of Berks., Will de Stanford, and Will de Waney, assigned for
the purpose of that collection."

In the II and 12 Henry III., Thomas de Multon and
Robert de Lexinton certified concerning escheats and ser-
jeanties, gifts and churches, which were in the disposition of
the king in the county of Hereford (p. 53, 66),

In the 13th Henry III., the Bishop of Durham, then in the

Itinerary of the lord the king, gave the verdict of the county

of Northampton concerning the boys and girls (de valettis
26

378 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

et puellis who should be in the king's custody, and of the
escheats and inquisitions.

A great number of returns are made for the scutage of the
19th Henry HI., for marrying the king's sister to the Emperor
of the Romans. These are to be found at pages 73, 75, 89,
116, and 210, and at many others. At folio 261, the husband
is described as Fredrick the Roman Emperor.

There is a writ for Devonshire (page 198), so special in its
terms, that, with attention, many of the sections of the work
can be affiliated. It it dated 15th Dec, ii of King Henry III. :

" To the sheriff, &c We command you that, in the good
faith which you bear towards us, you shall, for the whole of
your county, after the feast of St. Hilary, diligently make
inquisition concerning the lauds of Normans, Britons, and of
others (who are strangers,) who hold any lands of either our
father or of ourselves in your county, that is to say, who now
hold these lands, and of what value each such land is, and of
whose grants those lands -are held ; and clearly and distinctly
make known to our Barons of Exchequer at Westminster, on
the morrow of the Purification of the Blessed Virgin, such lands,
their value, and the names of each who hold them, by your
sealed letters, and so that you diligently inquire, &c."

A very special writ was issued to the sheriffs on the 9th day
of December, 27th Henry III. That for Hereford is preserved
(page 62). The king " was given to understand that many in
your county who hold by military service, as well of our-
selves, as of others who hold of us in chief, refuse to pay
scutage for their fees, and who say that they do not hold by
militar)^ service, neither of ourselves, nor of those who hold
of us in chief, and because scutages are conceded to us by the
-common counsel of the kingdom, as well of new feoffment as
of old, we command you that you diligently make inquisition
in your said county, as well within its liberties as beyond, by the
oaths of twelve approved and legal men, as well knights as
others who shall be able to know better concerning those things,
and who are of such order that they are able to take to them
others, if many things they fail to find, what fees are held, as well
of oursdves as of those who hold of us in capite, both new and
old feoffment ; and that you destrain those who hold those fees
to pay our scutage of their fees, so that you have that scutage

THE TESTA DE NEVIL. 379

Upon your next accounting at the Exchequer ; and for this
inquisition and writ, Test, &c., inquire of each fee in each
county, both who hold fees, and of whom and in whose lands
are such fees, and of whose honour the fees are held, whether
they are the chief honours in the county or not ; and of those
who hold chief honours in your county, what fees they have
in the county, and in whose lands, and if any and in what fee
and land now in the remaining vills of the whole county by the
hundred, making the Roll, in which are contained the names
of the towns and the names of the tenants of the same, and by
what service they say they are held, and of whom ; and the
sheriffs shall have that Roll at the Exchequer, together with
the Roll of Fees.'*

It would rather seem that this writ was issued in consequence
of frauds upon a scutage granted the previous year, 26 Henry
III., for taking an army into Wascony. There are a number of
this Aid clearly identified, on pages 81, 119, 148, 239, 293,
306, and many others.

There are a great many serjeanties of Robert Passilew which
seem referable to this grant. The Southampton Vascon Scutage
is called Robert Passilews. His name and that of the Vascon
Roll will take a very large portion of the whole work out of the
region of doubt, and if all those passages for which writs can
be traced upon the Close Rolls are also excepted, there will be
but little left for disputation.

The Close Roll for the 26th Henry III!, No. 54, /.d, gives the
writ in full which was sent to the Sheriff of Northampton.

Similar writs were sent to the Sheriffs of York, Line, War.,

*

Leic, Beds., Bucks., Som., Dorset, Norf., Suff., Hereford, Essex,
Suss., Salop., Devon., Wilts,, Hertford, Oxon., Glouc, and
Rutland.

The writ commanded the sheriff to return, within fifteen days
of St Michaelmas* term, which would be in the feast of St.
Edward, the scutage of all knights' fees held of the king in capite,
and of knights' fees, which were held in ward of the king in
capite, and what were in the sheriffs hands, for the scutage
granted for the transport of the army into Wascony. Dated
4th August, 26th Henry III.

Other writs are inscribed after the same Close Roll, directed
to those great nobles who had their own bailiffs or sheriffs, and

38o THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

who made their own returns to the Exchequer, that is, gave
certificates of the kind already set out in the Red Book.

Just as, in all probability, that book was compiled for the use
of the Exchequer officers employed to carry out the fiscal
reforms of Archbishop Hubert Walter (and therefore it con-
tained all the records from the time of Domesday, which still
remained in the Exchequer), so the Testa de Nevil, that is, that
portion so called, was in all probability compiled for the use
of the officers by the Archbishop's successor, the Chancellor
Neville. The date of its first portion, called the Testa de
Nevil (or at any rate of the major portion of it), is the year
1 198. And it may occasionally be identified by the use of the
phrase, " wainages of carucates," which is rarely to be found in
later records. According to Spelman, and following him,
Sir Travers Twiss (see his edition of Bracton), wainagium
means a wagon, or the paraphernalia of one. But it would
seem tather that it was the fruits or rents of the carucate,
that is, the gainage or earnings of the land — its rental;
and this would seem to be the meaning of the instances
of its uses given by du Cange. It is probably an English
form of the Gallic-Latin word ganagium, though it is no
doubt sometimes used in the sense of plough-gear. Probably
Bracton uses it in that sense, but this can hardly have been
the meaning here. It would rather be the rent or fruits of
ploughing than the number of ploughs belonging to each
carucate, for on examination it will be found that the amount
of gainage does not co-ordinate with the sum of the carucates
which would be the case if it was the measure of ploughs.
In Magna Charta the word is "gainage" (Cap. 14), by
which time, no doubt, the word had generally assumed that
form for common use. In the returns for Warwick and
Leicester (under the title Testa de Nevil, page 93), we find it
repeatedly used ; but it seems rarely to be found in the book,
even in those portions which are clearly of the date 1 198.

It may be objected by Derbyshire students that these
observations are of a very general character, and do not apply
exclusively to this County — and this must be conceded — but it
is hoped that they will not be regarded as less valuable on this
account. They are intended to aid the historians of other
counties who may have to consider the effect of these documents,

• *»

ij

i ^

THE TESTA I>E NEVIL. 38 1

and the principle adopted by the Author, and stated in the
Preface (page xi), is to endeavour to make this work a con-
tribution to the great subject of English History, and to aid in
elevating it from its present very unsatisfactory and equivocal
position. There is more of true history to be gathered from the
pages of Testa de Nevil, alone, than from scores of great works
which are made to pass muster as English History, and which
the unhappy scholars of our Universities and great Schools are
taught to regard as the embodiment of truth. To write history
correctly, one must first study our great National Records.

382

Zbc Zcsta ^e DeviL

SERJEANTY OF NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY.

FoL. 93.

(INQUISITION MADE BY THE KNIGHTS APPOINTED
BY ARCHBISHOP HUBERT WALTER IN 1198).

(This entry, consisting only of seven items, is in a different
handwriting from that which immediately follows, which is
clearly post Henry III.)

I. — Col wye Reginald de, holds the land of Col wye by the
service of serjeanty, and the jury say that his land is only worth
£6 per annum.

Note. — This land was Peverel's, as appears by an escheat of
26 Henry III., this Reginald de Colwyc being then dead, having
left his son and heir, Philip, aged 40. In 6 Edward I. the jury
found that Reginald Colwyc lived 100 years. He was probably
the son of Wm. de Colwyc who (21 Henry II.) paid a fine for
having sold a horse to the king's enemies.

Reginald de Colwyc also held lands in Willoughby-in-the
Wolds sok to Clifton.

2. — Picot Peter held Ratcliff and Kynaston by the serjeanty
of Hostricery (keeping the king's goshawks). The land was
6 carucates and a half, and of the value of £g per annum.

Note. — The Picots held Ratcliff-upon-Soar in the time of
Henry II. They held lands in the counties of Kent, Essex, and
Hertford, and Kinaston in Nottingham sok to Ratcliff.

There is no record of Wm. Peverel having held these manors,
and but for this entry it would appear that this was a record
simply of his honour ; all the other entries preserved belonging

THE INQUISITION OF ARCHBISHOP HUBERT WALTER. 383

to it Unfortunately Derbyshire has preserved but a portion of
the serjeanties and but few of the knights* fees of the county.

3. — Coste Will fil held in Huccenal the wainage of one
carucate and certain assarts, and a certain mill, by the serjeanty
of Falconer, and it was worth £6 los. William himself came
and asserted that he duly performed his serjeanty, and had
the kinpr's falcons then at his house.

NOTR — William fil Coste died some time before S John, for
that year Henry Brito, of Huccenal, then paid 6 marcs for
having the custody of his land and the marriage of his heir.
How long the land had been in the king's hands prior to this
date we have no record. He was probably of the family of
Joceus le Fleming, in whose manor of Kirkby he held land.

The manor of Huccenal was a portion of the forfeited estate
of Peverel.

5. — Passeis Robert de, held the wainage of three carucates of
land in Sutton, worth by the year 30s., and for finding a certain
horse worth half a marc

Note. — This land was in Sutton Passeis, and part of it was
of the fee of Peverel. Robert was the son of Will de Passeis,
who is mentioned in a Pipe Roll of 33 Henry H. as being then
one of the king's sergeants. He was probably a descendant of
William de Passeis, who received a grant out of the Peverel
fee as early as 4 Henry II. in Newbolt and Blisworth. (See
Pipe Rolls.)

6. — Brunesley Galf de, held in Brunesley and in Trowell the
wainage of one carucate and a half, and this is held by
serjeanty, and the knights who swear to the value say that it
is only worth twenty shillings by the year, and this serjeanty
is of the Honour of Peverel.

Note. — This is an especially interesting record for Derby-
shire history, although but little is known of this family ; but this
entry takes back their pedigree earlier than Thoroton was able to
deduce it The first whom he could certainly find (see Vol. II.,
p. 289) was Roger de Brunesly, who died 12 Henry III., who
was probably a son, or grandson of Galfred. Gilbert de
Brunesley, the son of Roger, was then an infant in the custody
of Ralf Brito. In 1 1 Henry III. Ralf Brito paid 5 marcs for
the custody of the heir of RobL Brunesley. The arms of the
family are somewhat similar to those of the Britos of Walton,

384 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

to whose family (from this, and from the fact of these custodies
being given to them), they probably belong. They bore or and
sabUy quartered with a chevron itself, also quarterly between
three escallops counter-changed, but the chief interest attaching
to this family arises from their connection with Trowell. They
held it with the other manors of William Ostarius, the father of
Robert fil William de Stanley, in Derbyshire and Notts., of the
time of Domesday, and about this date William de Stanley
held two bovates in Trowell of Richard de Trowell, in all
probability of the same family. He was the son of another
William de Stanley, and his brother Nicolas sold Stanley Park
to the fitz Ralfs, who there founded the Abbey of Dale.
The chronicle of Thomas de Musca states than Stanley was sold
to Wm. fitz Ralf, the Justiciar of Normandy, tempe John, by
Nicolas, brother of William Childe. (Glover has erroneously
son). But this ** child " is only the early English word for the
younger, which so puzzled Mr. E. A. Freeman. The Stanleys
soon after are found at Hucknall with the Britos of that place,
and later at Crophill, with the Britos, Anesleys, and Vilers
holding under the Botilers of that place, and of Warrington in
Lancashire. But little is known of the origin and history of this
family of de Trowell, or Stanley. Glover, in not unnatural
desire to secure the honour for the County of Derby, has boldly
affiliated the noble family of the present Earls of Derby, and in
happy ignorance he has identified Stanely and Baltcrley, in
Staffordshire, with Stanley and Butterley in Derbyshire; and
from this former place he asserts the family have taken their
surname. In this assertion, notwithstanding the extraordinary
errors into which he had fallen in giving his proofs, he may
be more accurate than the Heralds themselves, who, with equal
audacity, having lost the true scent, have affiliated the family,
as they have done in the case of the House of Cavendish, to a
family with which apparently they have but little connection.
It would, indeed, be very gratifying to the people of this County
to find that their Titular Lord is a scion of a native family, but
one must not be betrayed by this desire into accepting the idea
with too great precipitancy. It may frankly be admitted that
Glover's assertion is highly probable, but the proofs are not
easily to be obtained : the distinguished family of William, the
Hostarius of King William the Conqueror, having lost their

THE FEODARY OF II98. 385

possessions— or a great portion of them — in the troublous
reigns of the sons of the Conqueror.

We learn from Leicestershire History that, in some mysterious
manner, the great Roger de Busli succeeded as heir to the estates
of Robert fil Will Hostarius in that county ; in Notts., they held
the Manor of Stanford jointly. Evidently this family were
faithful to the Conqueror, and unwisely for their interests,
remained attached to his unworthy heir — the Duke Robert —
for we find in that humiliating compact in 1088, by which the
rapacious and wily Prince Henry purchased from him the
Cotentin and other districts, including the Lordship of Hugh,
Earl of Chester, that Roger Hostarius was one of the
witnesses on the part of the Earl.

The StaflFordshire Pipe Rolls, edited by General Wrottesley,
show that a Robert de Stanley held the sheriffdom of that
County in the time of Henry I. And, as it appears that this
family were allied to the great House of Busli, it is not
remarkable, seeing that King Henry could not find in his heart
to restore to them their great possessions (he had seized them as
an escheat of Robert de Belisme, whose " alleged heirship " to
them was of very doubtful character), that he should, as some
compensation, make one member sherifTof Stafford, and another
(Ranulf fil Ingelram), sheriff of this County ; at present we are
without proof of the identity of Robert fil William de Stanley
(Derbyshire), with the sheriff of Stafford of that name, or of the
connection of the Stanleys of Trowell with the Domesday holder
of Stanley, but unquestionably the first and last held the same
inheritance in direct succession ; and this, with the similarity of
their surnames, is sufllicient to give a hope of ultimately solving
this difficulty, and obtaining proof of their relationship. It is a
very curious circumstance which may have a deeper import than
at present appears apparent, that the family of the present Earl
of Derby, if not representatives in the male line of a branch of
the House of de Busli, unquestionably represent the heiress of
the House of Ranulf fitz Ingelram, who was a scion of this great
family.

(Fo. 94). 7. — Sandiacre, Peter holds his lands in Sandiacre by
the same serjeanty of Ostricerie, and it is worth per annum
£j los., and Richard de Riston holds of his fee of the same

386 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

serjeanty the wainage of one canicate of land, and Peter came
and said that he performed his service annually.

Note. — In 4 Henry II. Peter de Sandiacre was excused a
payment of 8s. 2d. In 7 Richard I. Beatrice de Halum paid
three marcs for having her dower out of the lands of Peter
de SandiacrCj her former husband, and in 10 Richard I. Peter
de Sandiacre paid ;f lOO for having seizin of Horsley, which
he said was his inheritance for the service of five knights.

The Assize Rolls of King Richard show that Peter de Sandi-
acre and Walter Malet had land at Horsley and Cotgrave.

(FOL. 94). THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

The following entry is certainly earlier than the year 3
Henry III., for in that year Philip Marc purchased the marriage
of the heir of Oliver fil Nigel, and the first entry in this Roll
shows that this piece of patronage, or rather of plunder, was still
in the king's hands. Of course the grant of the marriage does
not show how long the king had enjoyed it ; that must be
ascertained from other records.

Again it was clearly prior to 6 Henry III., for that year
William Hardreshill was able to complete the payment of a fine
of 100 marcs for obtaining his inheritance, which the Roll shows
was incomplete for want of sureties. That it was of the reign
of King John would seem to appear to be the case, because
Brian de Insula was holding the escheated Barony of Ralf
Taisson, and King John gave part of it, Wateley, to Nicolas de
Lectris, whilst in 4 Henry III. it was granted to Roger de
Montebegonis.

But the most important entry is that relating to William fil
Walkelin, of Steynesby. He was certainly living in i John,
but he probably died before the 2nd of the king, for in the Pipe
Roll of that year it is recorded that Robert le Salvage fined for
the marriage of his heiress. It may well be, therefore, that this
also is a Roll of 1 198, the notes in it relating to King John
having been added subsequently.

(Note. — The whole of this entry ^ without any variation^ is
copied over again without being headed Testa de NeviL)

I. — The heir of Oliver fil Nigel held one knight's fee in

THE FEODARY OF 1 1 98. 387

Langford, and is in the custody of the Archdeacon of Stafford,
and is of the Bishopric of Chester.

2. — Brian de Insula ought to answer for the Barony of Ralf
Taisson, in Wateley, and its soke, and also for the Barony of
Ralf fitz Stephen.

3. — ^John de Bassingbum ought to answer for the Honour of
Tickill.

^ — Ralf Musard held half a knight's fee in Stanley, of the
Barony of Musard.

5. — Wm. Briwere held the 10 knights' fees in Nottingham-
shire and Derbyshire, of the gift of King John, of the Barony
of Buron.

Note. — The wording of this entry in the printed Testa de-
Nevil is given as " fees and knights " (feod* et milit'), which
puzzled the author, until he compared the proofs with the
original Testa. It must not be inferred from this that there
is any intention to disparage the transcription made of the
early records for the editors for the M. R. The work on the
whole is very good ; the weakness is in the editorial depart-
ment. The Pipe Rolls of 6 Richard I. show that Wm. Briwere
had then the Barony of Buron in his hands, so that this entry
may refer to any year after that date.

6, 7, 8 and 9. — Fulco Painel defended the Barony of Bingham
by the service of one knight's fee, but he had enfeoffed Hugh
de Bingham and John de Cruce with that service. Afterwards
the same Fulc was disseized upon the occasion of the writ of
the king concerning the lands of Normans ; and that vill, with
its appurtenances, was given to Henry de Balliol for ;;^I2 of land,
and the services of the said Hugh and John were retained in the
hands of the king.

10. — Richard Basset held one knight's fee in Coleston, and
Rad Basset for him.

II. — Richard de Sutton held one knight's fee in Sutton of
the Honour of Richmond (for which Peter de Leonibus should
respond).

Note. — Peter de Leonibus did not succeed to the Honour

388 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

of Richmond until 1203, but the words here placed in brackets
(they are not so placed in the original), may have been added
subsequently. As to the probability of these additions, see
William Briwere, No. 5.

12. — Stephen de Beauchamp held c. shillings land in Cotes, in
Derbyshire, rendering one armlet (bracketum) upon the king's
arrival in Derbyshire.

(Fo. 95.) 13. — Brocton was the land of Alured de Sulleny, a
certain Norman, and it was seized into the king's hands, but
the king restored that Manor to the Earl of Chester because
that knight held it of him ; and the mother of the Earl held
the same in dower, and it was the fee of one knight.

Note. — The mother of the Earl here referred to was Maud,
daughter of Robert the Consul, son of Henry I. She was living
in 32 Henry II., for she then held the Manor of Wadington in
dowry (Rot de Dom Puellis).

14. — Robert de Chauces held one fee in chief in Mamham
and Waddeworth. (King John confirmed the grant of these
places to him in the fifth year of his reign.)

15. — Roger de Montebegonis held one knight's fee in Tuxford,
and soke in Barony. (The Pipe Roll of 2 John records that he
gave 500 marcs for having the heiress of Tuxford in marriage.
He may have held the inheritance without the marriage
previously.)

16. — Will, de Aubeny held £26 land in Orskinton by the
service of two knights.

17. — William fil Robert held cxii. solidates of land in Clay-
worth, paying therefor annually one mewed hawk, and this is
now in the king's hands, and William de Hardreshill fined for
that land for 100 marcs, but he had not yet found pledges.

Note. — Wm. Hardreshill's fine was completed 6 Henry III.
Wm. fil Robert was confirmed in his grant 6 John.

18. — Magister Alan de Bolsover held 75s. 3d. land in
Oswarddebec by the service of one pair of golden spurs.

19. — Roger de Lanum held 4 m. rent and the mill of Tilue
by the service of one sore hawk.

THE FEODARY OF 1 1 89. 389

20. — Henry Corbin held two marcs of land, in Derlton, but
the jury are ignorant by what service.

21.- — Agatha Bretel held i fee in Flintham.

22. — Wm. Pincerna held 2 knights fees in Crophiil and
Kinoulton and elsewhere.

23. — Michael de Mannuers held 2 fees in Holm (he is men-
tioned in the scutages of 3 and 4 John).

24 — Robert de Gresley held one fee in Cotgrave.

25. — Rad de St George and Rics de Furnell held one fee in
Bothimeshill.

26. — Eustace de Morton held two fees in Gamelston with the
inheritance of Rand de Marisco. (6 Richard 1. paid his relief
for his land.^

27. — Will fil Walkelin held Steynesby for one sore hawk.
Gilbert fil Remfred ought to respond for the whole fee
of Lancaster. (Steynesby was formerly part of the Barony of
Roger de Poiteau, Baron of Lancaster. The Hardwick charters
show that King John confirmed the charter of Henry II. in
the first year of his reign. In 2 John, it is given upon the
t^ipe Rolls. Robert le Savage paid for the marriage of his
daughter).

28, — Peter de Sandiacre held his land of the value of ;f 10 by
the service of (Ostriceria) gos-hawkes. (Peter fil Peter de
Sandiacre paid his relief 10 Richard I.)

29. — William fil William held the fees of 5 knights, for which
Wills de Harcourt ought to respond. They are of the fee of
the constable of Chester.

Note. — Those fees must have been in Tickill when Will fil
Walkelin was a tenant. There was an early connection between
fitz Walkelin and Harcourt which has not been explained. The
Red Book for Derbyshire shows that Ivo de Harcourt (qy.,
de Heriz) held 3 knights' fees with William fil Walkelin of the
Earl Ferrars.

390

THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

LIST OF TENANTS HOLDING AT THE TIME OF
ARCHBISHOP HUBERT WALTER'S INQUISI-
TION (1 198).

16. Albini, Wm.

10. Basset, Richard.

9. Bailliol, Henry.

3. Bassingbourne, John.

12. Bellocampo, Step.

7. Bingham, Hugh.

16. Bolsover, Magr Alan.
21. Bretel, Agatha.

5. Briwere, Wm.

6. Brunesly, Galf.
14- Chauces, Robert

I. Colwic, Reginald.

3. Coste, Wm. fil.

20. Corbin, Henry.

8. Cruce, John de.
25. Furnels, Rich.
24- Gresley, Robert.
23. Harcourt, Wm.

1 7. Hardreshill, Wm. fil Robt.

2. Insula, Brian.

19. Lanum, Roger.

23. Manners, Michael.

26. Marisco, Ralf.

15. Montebegonis, Roger.

26. Mortain, Eustace.
4 Musard, Ralf.

1. Nigel, Oliver fil.

5. Passeis, Robert.

6. Painel, Fulc.

2. Picot, Peter.
22. Pincerna, Wm.

28. Reinfred, Gilbert fil.

7*lSandiacre, Peter.
29.)

2$. St. George, Rad.

13. Suleini, Alured.

1 1. Sutton, Richard.

27. Walkelin, Wm. fil.

(FOL. 673.) NAMES OF THOSE WHO HOLD OF THE
KING OF THE HONOUR OF TICKILL, AND
THEIR SERVICES,

(Part of this return is that of 1 198, since it is made by Roger
Badvet, but other parts apparently are of Henry III.) -

Constable of Chester holds
John de Builli
Gerard Furnival
Nigel de Luvitot
Adam de Novoforo -
Hugh de Steinton

8 fees.
6

5i

5

4
I

THE FEODARY OF 1 1 98.

391

Roger de Montebegonis, Alex, de Menilla, and

Ad Brito i fee.

Adam de WIvessic I

Eustace de Vescey |

Robert de Saiideby ij

Rad Selvein i

Ranulf de Novoforo, Robt de St. Quinton, and

Rich de Furneus i

Wm. de Cressy - - -'- - - -4

Will fil Walkelin 4

Thorn de Wlangton 2

Hugo de Hedun 2

Malveisinus -------2

Roger Monachus (Musters) - . - .

Phs de Ulecote

Robert de Neapun

Wm. Pincerna

Robert de Chevrecourt

John de Heincourt and Rad de Willeby

Robert fil Wm. 2

Robert de Chauces 2

Rich de Scelton i

Robt Maluvel i

Wm. de Marcfiam i

Philip de Ulecotes and John de Nevil owe one Sunipter

horse (Sumar*), when the king went into Wales.
Adam de Heton and Wm. fil Hubert the same.
Dna de Bukcton the same.
Wm. fil Wm. owes one sore or soarhawk (ancipite*

soru'), or 20s. to the castle.
Roger de Montebegonis and Alexr. de Neville the same.
Nich de Limesi holds the land which was Wm. de Lund's,

with the heir of William, by carrying a goshawk

(ostriceriam).
Hugh de Lettlewell holds eight bovates of land for the

custody of certain Beagles for six weeks.
Brian de Insula holds Latton, with its soke, and Wetelle,

the lands of the Normans, by the gift of the king.

392 THK TESTA DE NEVIL.

689. Dc Zceta be tie^il

HONOUR OF TYKILL.

(Fo. 691). — Will de London holds by serjeanty.

Dna de Bekinton, the same.

Will fil Herbert and Will fil Adam de Hayton the same.

Hugo Forestarius, do.

Serjeanty of John de Walkingham (by which he ought to be,
at the guarding the castle of York, and conducting the
treasury of the king beyond the County of York), is sold in part.

Galfr de Geveldal, for four bovates of land which he holds of
the same serjeanty, alienated for 5s. per annum.

Thomas fil Emma, the same.

Rich de Aslekaby holds two carucates in Aslekaby by the
service of training a hound (aptandi unum canem lyemur'.
Walter Boys holds two bovates in Loketon by the same service ;
now Jocelyn fil William. Hugo fil Ralf holds two bovates by
the same ; the same the Chapel of the Blessed Giles, one bovate ;
for the monks of Rossendale, one ; William Malekake, three
bovates ; Galfry Malekake, seven of the same.

Galf de Kynthorpe held his lands in Kynthorpe, which now
several hold.

(Fo. 692). — Colwyn holds in Hoton 5 car. and 6 bovates, and
one mill by the service of keeping the gate of the Castle of York,
which are sold ; so Will fil Robert held one car., value 40s. ;
Walter Blauncfront 5 bovates and a half; Thomas le Norrys
and Alan fil WilHam hold 3, worth 15s. ; Alan de Kirkham 3 J,
worth i6s. 6d. ; William Propositus and Matilda, his wife, 2
bovates, value lOs. ; Prior de Menton, 7 bovates, worth
35s.; Will fil Robert, one bovate, and besides several
tofts. The Countess of Ewe (Castle of Tickill), with its
appurtenances, of which several lands are sold. The value of
the manor of Tickill is ;^55 I4d. ; Laxton, £23 i8s. 6d. ;
Meuton, £g 3s. ; Hodishake, in the County of Nottingham, of
the same Castlery, £47 19s. i i^d.

Note. — The Monks of Wykham hold one bovate in which
they had ingress through Galf de Nevil, as an escheat of the

THE SERJEANTY OF 2 HENRY III. 393

king ; it was worth los. per annum. Philippa de Tyli has in the
town of Menton £j of land, and in the town of Hupton
£6 14s. 8d. Also of the same Castlery of Tyckhill, in Notting-
hamshire, are enfeoffed 40 knights' fees, which render to the^
guarding the Castle ;;^20 per annum, and for provisioning the
guard 27s. 4d. Besides these are certain fees which do not pay
ward, but scutage when it occurs. Of these has the Countess
13 fees and a half and 2 parts and a quarter, paying £6 17s.,
and to the provisioning the guard 9s. 6d., and the heirs of
John Vipont hold 3I fees of the same.

We now arrive at a portion of the book which is clearly
interpolated improperly. The handwriting is smaller, the ink
darker, than the entries which both precede and succeed it, both
of which are headed Testa de Neville.

The following Roll, which is also entitled de Testa de Nevil.
is probably between the dates of 2 and 4 Henry III. It can
hardly be earlier, for Hugo fil William fil Coste is mentioned,
and he only paid his relief the second year of the king, nor
can it be later than 5 Henry III., for Thomas, son of Roger
Lanum, mentioned in this Roll, then paid his relief: —

De tTceta be flcvIL

HONOUR OF PEVEREL OF LONDON. (Fo. 95 )

Roger de Lanum held by a sore hawk.

Hugo fil Robert by the same service.

Wenhunwin Walens held ^30 of land in the same manner.
(This, doubtless, was the Prince of Wales who was imprisoned so
cruelly by King Edward I.)

Peter Picot Radecl by the service of hawking (austric*).

Galf de Trowell held by serjeanty.

John Passeis in the same manner.

Regin de Colwic by serjeanty.

Hugo fil Will Coste by serjeanty.

(Fo. 96.) Roger de Lanum held by sore hawk.

Hugo fil Robert in the same manner.
27

394 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Wenun Wen Walens held ^30 land in the same manner.

Peter Picot RatclifF by service of hawking.

Galfry de Crowell held by serjeanty.

Robert de Passeis by serjeanty.

Regin de Colwic by serjeanty.

Hugo fil William fil Coste by serjeanty.

The serjeanty which was Walter de Marisco's in Cotentin
(he was living 2 John), and which was held by giving to the
king a pair of scarlet breeches (unum par calegar' rubei scarleti)
is wholly alienated.

The Prior of St Catherine's of Lincoln, who held (£) 22
of land, alienated of his serjeanty land of the value of 40s., so
that Robert Porter paid to the said prior his accustomed rent for
the land which he held of the prior of the said alienation, and
of increment only 3d.

RAD FIL NIC AND HUGO FIL RALF RENDERED
COMPOSITION OF THE GIFTS, PLEAS, AND CON-
CESSIONS OF THE KING WITH REGARD TO
MARRIAGES.

(They were sheriflFs together from the 12 to the 18 Henry III.
Probably this dates this portion of the document.)

They also render account of the Priory of Shelford and for

10 m. for the Priory of Lenton, and for 5 m. each for the Priory

of Thurgarton, Blye, Wyrksop, and the Abbey of Darley, and

4 m. for the Priory of Rependon ; sum ;f 26. In the treasury

, paid by 1 1 tale, and they are quit.

The last paragraphs have evidently no kind of connec-
tion with the preceding, and probably not with each other.
The scribe has evidently inserted them here in order to get
them in somewhere.

(This is given just as it is written. It is clear on the face of
it, to say nothing of its repetitions, that it is a copy of a mere
memorandum, and not of an inquest of any authority. The
names agree with those of the first list, with the exception of
Hugo fil William Coste being given instead of his father, and
Galfry de-Trowell and Crowell instead of Galf de Brunesley,
no doubt the same person. Prince Wenunwyn is added, and

THE SERJEANTY OF 2 HENRY IH. 395

Peter de Sandiacre omitted. It was probably made to guide
the exchequer offices with respect to the annual services. The
following entries are of greater importance.)

It should be noted that we are on safe ground in
dating the following Roll as of that of King John, for it
is so stated on the Roll itself It is declared that the Priors
and Canons of Newstead held certain land in Oswaldebec of
the gift of Henry, the father of the now king, whereas, if it had
been made in the reign of Henry III., King John would
have been the sire. Philip Marc was sheriff of Nottingham from
the 12 of John to the 9th of Henry III., so that the former date is
the earliest that can be assigned to it, there being, therefore,
only five years during which it must be dated. This limit can
be further reduced by two years by a charter of the king to
Richard Briwere. This Roll states the Lord William Briwere
held it at a rental of £79, and no doubt he did so by a charter
of King John in the 6th year of his reign, confirming a charter
probably made by himself when Earl of Morton ; but in the
15th year of his reign he, at the request of William Briwere,
granted to his son Richard at the same rate, and after his
decease — how long after is not clear — William Briwere, the
younger, had a charter granting him the same estates, not as
fee-farm, but by knight service, which, by the way, since it was
of the ancient demesne of the Crown, it was unlawful to do.
This inquest, therefore, may be positively dated between the
1 2th and the 15th of King John, and probabilities point to its
being nearer the latter than the former date. Unfortunately,
the Close Rolls for this period are missing. There are none
for the lOth, nth, and 13th of King John, and only a fragment
for the 1 2th. There is, however, in the 14th, a writ directed to
all the sheriffs of England to summon all those who held of
the king by serjeanty, that they should be at Chester with horse
and arms prepared to serve the king. These writs to prepare
for service were probably the excuse of enforcing these mulct.s,
and, therefore, that may be the correct date of the roll.

396 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

(FOL. 75.) INQUISITION MADE BEFORE PHILIP
MARC, SHERIFF OF THE DEMESNES AND
FEES OF THE LORD KING, AND WHICH
WERE ALIENATED BY HIM BY THE FOL-
LOWING KNIGHTS :— ADAM DE ST. MARIA,
NICH DAYVILL, THOMAS SANSON, ADAM DE
MUSCAMP, RICH DE FURNELL, TOM DE
SANDAL, HUGO DE STOKUM, WILL BASSETT,
ROBERT DE APPLEBY, WILL DE FOLVILLE,
RICH ' DE CURTON, GALF DE ACOUR, RAD
DE BAKEPUZ, JOHN DE AYNCOURT, AND
ROGER DE AINCOURT, AND OTHER DIS-
CREET JURORS.

I. — Reginald de Colwyc holds one carucate of land in Col wye
by serjeanty and by the service of twelve arrows, and a third
part of one carucate in Wilgeby, for finding one load-horse
(runcinum), with one sack, whenever the king goes into Wales,
of the Honour of Peverel.

2. — Emma de Beaufoy holds Ludham, of the Honour of
Tikhill, for one knight's fee.

3. — Ralf de Crumwell held the vill of Lameleia in fee-farm,
paying annually within the farm of Tickhill ;f 10, which formerly
was the king's fee of Buylby (Busli).

4. — In Wudburg is one bovate of the demesne of Reg de
Arnhale, which Hugh de Nevil (5) holds within the farm of
Arnhale, of the gift of King John, which pays 28s. lod.

(Fo. 76.) In Oxton, one small bovate which is taken from the
greater bovate of Wudburg, and which should respond in Arnhale.

6. — In Wudburg are 33s. rent of the Prebend, which wasGalf
the Canon's, and thirty chickens (gallin'), which the Archbishop
of York gave to Thomas de Ripun (7) during his absence.

8. — In Muscamp is one knight's fee, and Robert held it of the
Archbishop of York, and it is now in the king's hands.

THE FEODARY OF I4 JOHN. 397

9. — Robert de Chaworth holds two parts of one fee in Marn-
ham of the Honour of Tichill in chief, and a third part in
Wudburg of the same Honour.

It is recorded by the Dean and Chapter of Newark that
Mathew de Ripon, clericus (10), has half the Church of Kelum,
of the gift of the Archbishop of York, during his absence, the
other half by the presentation of the Prior of Shelford, and the
whole Church is worth ten marcs.

II. — The land which was Ralf Taisson's in Wattelya, and
with its soc, is in wardship of Brian de Insula, and is worth
£2(> 13d.

The Archbishop of York gave the Church of Solum, with its
appurtenances, to Wni. de Lanum. It belonged to the Prebend
of York during the Archbishop's absence, and is worth ten m.

BROCULMSTOWE.

Lenton, with its appurtenances, was of the demesne of Wm.
Peverel, and he therein founded the Abbey of Lenton.

In Lenton and Radford are c. shillings rent, that is to say, one
mill and two bovates of land in Radford, and the same in
Lenton,«and 24 hens (gallin*), and the work of eight men for one
day in August, which William fil Coste (12) held by the service
of Falconer, and they arc now seized into the king's hands.

In Sutton there are two bovates of land, soc of Arnhale,
which at one time paid 5s. rent, but now H. de Nevil holds
them in hand.

(Fo. 77.) 13. — In the same vill Robert de Passeis holds in
serjeanty two and a half carucates of land, by one load horse
and one sack for the Welsh army, and it is of his fee of the
Honour of Peverel.

14.— rin Trowell Galf holds one carucate, and in Brunesly half
a carucate, by serjeanty of one load-horse, worth 5s., and one
sack worth 4d., when the king goes into Wales, and is of the
Honour of Peverel.

15, — Walter de Strelly holds two bovates in Strelly, which
anciently were of the soc of Arnhal, paying annually 3s. Galf
de Broculstowe held two bovates in Broculstowe by the same
service, of the same socage, and H. de Novavilla (t6) received
that farm.

398 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

ly^ — Galfry de Broculstowe held one bovate of land in Broc',
and rendered yd. to the soc of Arnhal.

In Bulwell was one and a half carucates of land, which was held
in the time of William Peverel by the service of one load-horse
and one halter (capustru'), and King John gave it to Roger
Rastal (i8), but it is not known by what service he holds it.

The monks of Lenton hold one mill and one meadow for 50s.,
which were accustomed to belong to Lindibi, in exchange for
Papelwick.

The Barons of the Exchequer say that by the inquisition
respecting the mill and the meadow it ought to be computed
in the farm of Lindibi, that is to say, in the ^15 4s. which
Will de St Michael (19) has not, but only jC6 8s., as is con-
tained in the Roll of 2 John.

In Papelwick, one carucate of the king's demesne of Mans-
field, which the canons of Newstead held in free alms of the
gift of King Henry, and it is worth 5s.

20. — In Kirkby are two bovates of land of William fil Coste,
which William fil Gilbert held for i lb. of pepper, and now they
are in the king's hands, with all William fil Coste's lands,
which were seized by his writ

The men of the soc of Mansfield say that there was a conten-
tion between the demesne of the king at Mansfield and Roger
le Poher (21), who holds of Peter de Gauditon (21), of the
Honour of Peverel (during which contention Roger de Holbrook
holds it), who asserts that his ancestors were accustomed to pay
2s. against the men of Mansfield ; so he asserts : and Roger le
Poher denies that it is in the fee which he holds of the said
Peter, and seeks that it should not be in Notts. ; and the men
of Mansfield seek that ft should not be in Derbyshire, but that
it may be divided by perambulation.

(Fo. 78.) The same say that Grimstone, with its appurts, is
defended (answered for) for two carucates of land, which were
given to the Church of Lincoln in free alms when the church
was built, at a period before the Conquest ; and Robert Bardolf
(22) now holds that land of Walter de Clifford (23) by the
service of one knight, and Walter, in capite of the Bishop and
the Chapter, and he is Senescal of the Bishop for that fee,
together with the remaining part of the fee, which he likewise

THE FEODARY OF 1 4 JOHN. 399

holds of the same ; and that land was so anciently given that
it is not known who gave it.

The same jury say with respect to the same vill of Cuckney
(quod audierunt dici), that they had heard tell that two
carucates which William de Queron holds in Cuckney used to
be of the demesne of Mansfield, and that Henry the King,
grandfather of King John, then enfeoffed Richard fil Coste, so
that he should shoe (ferrare) the palfry of the Lord King when
he lay at Mansfield at the fortress or prison (cloera) of the said
Lord King, and by the same service his heirs now hold it, that
is to say, William de Queron in right of his wife.

24. — Carlton, in Lindric, is of the soc of Mansfield, whence
Henry Corbin has 33s. 4d., and Philip Minekan (25) responds
to the Exchequer for the remainder (26). Also, they say that
Hugh de Stiveton and John Dayncourt (27) gave the king ten
marcs so that they might be allowed to enclose within their
parks one acre of land, with the water which runs between their
parks, and certain lands which belong to the soke of Mansfield.

(Fo. 79.) The prior and convent of Newstead hold in the
Manor of Oswardebec in Warcringham c. shillings of land of
the gift of Henry, the father of the now king, and £y 6d. in
Walkeringham and Sepewick, and other members, of the gift of
the Lord John the King when he was earl, and afterwards he
confirmed it, with the consent of King Richard. (This entry
proves conclusively that this inquest was made in the time of
King John.)

28. — Hugo fil Robert was accustomed to hold, by the gift of
King Henry, cxii. shillings in Clawed, paying one mewed hawk,
and he is now dead, and his land is in the king's hands.
(William de Hardreshill, 6 Henry HI., paid his relief for this
land.)

29. — Roger de Lanum has within the same manor, of the gift
of King John, four marcs, that is, in the mill of Tilne 3 m., and
the land of Tilne i m., paying instead one sore hawk.

3a — Magister Alan de Belleshour held in the same manor
7SS. 3d., lands of the gift of King John, paying one pair of
spurs.

31. — Lisiard de Musters holds 13 bovates in Legerton pay-
ing I OS. rent.

4CX> THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

32. — ^John de Orreby holds 4d. in Tilne without making
service, and the jury are ignorant by whom he had ingress. It
is worth 2s. per annum.

33. — In Wiston, within the same manor, are 4J bovates of
land, which anciently paid los., which Henry, grandfather of
King John, gave to one William le Harper, paying I5d. per
annum, at which rent his heir now holds it (The word in the
record is avus, which was frequently used for proavus. At all
events, Henry I., who is probably here indicated, is not
infrequently called the " grandfather " of King John.)

- 34. — The men of Dunham say that the Earl of Bolon has
;;^SO of land of the gift of Henry, the king, who gave it to
Mathew, the Earl, and the Earl of Bolon had it in right of his
wife.

35. — In the same manor, Brian de Insula has the custody of
land worth ^10 of Kingshay, in Derleton.

36. — The Abbot of Wei bee has 12s. 6d. land in the Manor of
Ednestowe, of the gift of King John.

(Fo. 80.) 37. — The Abbot of Derley has los. rent in the
Borough of Derby in free alms, of the gift of Henry, father of
King John.

38. — The Earl of Ferrars had c. shillings rent, which the
Sheriff of Lancaster computed within his farm, and the same
earl has, within the Borough of Nottingham, as many pence
(qy., as much money) in the same manner ; but the Jury do not
know by what autliority, or at what time the said pence were
first received from the Corpus of the counties of Nottingham
and Derby.

39. — In Lucchurch, a member of the Borough of Derby, Peter
de Sandiacre, has iocs, rent in exchange for Horsley.

The same Peter holds Chelmardon of the Honour of Peverel
in the Peak, for the service of lid. of one knight's fee to the
Lord William Briwere, by command of the Lord king, to whom
he owed the service for Horsley.

The same Peter holds Sandiacre with its appurtenances by
Hostricery, and it is worth ;f 10, but it is unknown whether it
was of the ancient demesne of the king or not. (At Domesday,

THE FEODARY OF 1 4 JOHN. 40I

this land was held by the king's Thanes. Toti, Cnut, and
Gladwin, had held it in the time of King Edward ; and King
William had held part of it in demesne).

40. — Seledus Faber, of Derby, holds a messuage in Derby of
the gift of King John, whilst he was earl, and for it pays to the
king two girdles (cinpulos) per annum.

41. — The Abbot of Burton holds all the lands which he has
in Derbyshire, in chief of the lord, in free alms from the time
when the Abbey was founded.

42. — The Earl Ferrars holds Drakelow, which is of the
Honour of Lancaster, in chief of the king by the service of one
bow and quiver (pharetre), with twelve arrows feathered
(fleccatis), which he renders to the king, of the gift of King
John.

43. — Stephen de Bellocampo holds Cotes of the king in chief
for one fleet hound (Brachetum), with leash (ligamie) ; but the
jury knew not of whose gift his ancestors so hold it, or whether
it was of the demesne of the king, or of the Honour of Lan-
caster. It is worth IOCS.

(Fo. 81.) 45. — Melburn was of the ancient demesne of the
King Henry, father of King John, who gave it to Hugh
Belcap, who gave 2s. rent out of it to ^the Canons of Calc in
free alms ; and to the church of Melburn i virg of land ;
and Oliver de Welbeof (46), Sos. land in Normanton with
its appurts, and which the said Oliver now holds of the king
in capite; and for this he has the confirmation of King
John. And the same Hugh de Beauchamp gave to Wm.
fil Colling (47) in the same vill, 12s, 8d. rent; and Peter, his
heir, held it with the consent of his lord, paying annually
with the farm, soke 2s. After the decease of H. de Belcap,
sen., Hugh, his son, held the vill of Melbourn of the gift of
his father, and afterwards came Oliver, his eldest brother, and
claimed the said manor, and afterwards they agreed so that the
said Hugh released to his said brother, Oliver, lOOs. rent in
Chelardeston, which the same Oliver gave to William fil
Galfry (48), with his daughter in free marriage, and the said
William now holds it by the consent and confirmation of the
king.

402 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

49. — The Earl of Chester holds whatever he has in Nottingham
and Derby of the king in chief, with his other tenements.

50. — The Earl Ferrars holds whatever he has in Nottingham
and Derby of the king in chief, included within the services
which he owes for his other fees.

The same earl holds the Manor of Wirksworth with the
Wapentake, paying* annually ;£"26.

The same earl holds the Mill of Wedensley, at fee farm of
the king.

51. — Ralf Musard holds Stavely of the king in chief, by the
service of half a knight's fee.

52. — The Lord William Briwere holds at Chesterfield, with
the soke and great Wapentake at fee farm, paying annually
for it £yg (in the last year of King John, that king granted
this fee to Richard, son of Wm. Briwere), also one carucate in
Chesterfield, in Wingerworth, which was anciently of the soke
of Wingerworth, and was given to the ancestor of Walchelin de
Ferrars, by King William the Bastard, as he says.

53. — William de Albini holds Oskinton, and the soke which
was of the demesne of the king, of the Lord King, by the service
of two knights, of the gift of King Richard, by the concession
of King John.

(Fo. 82.) 54. — In the same manner, the holy Monks of
Haverholm hold four librates of land of the gift of King
Henry, father of the Lord King, by exchange for Peverelthorpe.

55. — Fulc Painel was accustomed to hold Bingham in capite
of the king, by the service of one knight, and now Henry de
Bailliol (56), holds it of the gift of the king, he retaining to him-
self the services of Hugh de Bingham (57), and John de Cruce
(58), who were accustomed to make the same services to the
said Fulk when he was seized of it.

59. — Gerard de Rhodes holds Languard and Clifton, which
are part of the Honour of Peveril, of the gift of the Lord King
John, by the service of one knight of the new feoffment.

60.— Peter Picot holds Ratcliff in chief of the Lord King by
the service of Hostricery. It is worth £\o.

61. — Hubert fitz Ralf holds 15 fees of the king.

THE FEODARY OF I4 JOHN. 403

62. — Leonia de Stuteville, the same.

63. — The heir of Oliver Deincourt holds altogether 25 knight's
fees.

64. — The heir of Doun Bardolf holds 25 knight's fees, of
which 15 are enfeoffed, and 10 are held in demesne; but that
Barony is in the king*s hands.

The Barony of Lexington is in the king's hands, for which
Brian de Insula should respond.

66. — Gilbert fil Remfrey should answer for the Honour of
Lancaster.

(Fo. 83.) 67. — Brian de Insula should answer for the inquisi-
tion made in High Peak, in Newark, which belongs to the king
(as escheat of) the Archbishop of York.

The knights' fees held of the Honour of Peverel, and these
names were, upon another occasion, returned to the Exchequer
by Eustace Cleric (68), sheriff of Nottingham, (in the hands of
the Lord Archdeacon of Huntingdon, wheif he was sheriff.)
(Eustace de Ludham was Under-Sheriff of Nottingham in the
i6th of John. This is obviously a note made by the transcriber,
and could not be a part of the inquisition. It is of value to
show that the transcriber did make additions as they occurred
to him.)

69. — The Lord John de Bassingburn answers for the knights'
fees of the Honour of Tickill.

ALPHABETICAL LIST OF THE KNIGHTS OF THIS

PERIOD (12-1S JOHN).

53. Albini, William.
69. Bassingbourne, John.
64 Bardolf, Doun, heirs of.
22. „ Robert

56. Balliol, Henry.
2. Beaufoy, Emma.

43. Bellocampo, Stephen.

57. Bingham, Hugh.

36. Bolsover, Magr Alan.
52. Briwere, Wm.
12. Brunesly, Galf.

14. Broculston, Galf.

41. Burton, Abbot of.

4. Chaworth, Robt.

49. Chester, Earl of.

23. Clifford, Walter.

I. Colwyc, Reginald.

9. Coste, Will. fil.

24. Corby n, Hy.

47. Colling, Will. fil.

58. Cruce, John de.

3. Crumwell, Rad.

404

THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

26. Dayncourt, John.

63. „ Oliver, heir of.

37. Derley, Abbot

34. Dunham, Men of.
7. Ebor, Archiepis.

68. Eustace, Clic.
38,42,50. Ferrars, Earl.
21. Gaudeton, Peter.
48. Galf, Wm. fil.
20. Gilbert, Wm. fil.

28. Hardreshill, Hugo fil.

Robt.

35. Harper, Wm. le.

54. Haversholme, Monks of.
35,65-7. Insula, Brian.
65. Lexington, Barony of.

29. Lanum, Roger.
28. Monckton, Philip.

36. Musters, Lideard.
51. Musard, Ralf

10. Nevil, Hugh.

19,27. Newstead Priory.

15. Novavilla, H. (Neville).
32. Orreby, John.
55. Painel, Fulc.
1 1 . Passeis, Robt
6a Picot, Peter.
8. „ Wm.
21. Poher, Roger.
23. Queron, Wm.

61. Ralf, Hubert fitz.

17. Rastal, Roger.

66. Remfrey, Gilbert fil.
59. Rhodes, Gerard.
5. Ripon, Matthew.

18, St Michael, Wm.

39. Sandiacre, Peter.

40. Seledus, Faber.
26. Stiveton, Hugh.
13. Strelly, Walter.

62. Stuteville, Leonia.
1 1. Taisson, Ralf

46. Walbeof, Oliver.
36. Welbec, Abbot of.

THE VERDICT OF THE JURIES OF EACH WAPEN-
TAKE IN THE COUNTIES OF NOTTINGHAM
AND DERBY OF THE GIFTS OF THE BOYS
AND GIRLS (VADLETTIS ET PUELLIS) (OF
THE 2 HENRY III.) (FOL. 71).

There are no Pipe Rolls for the second year of Henry III., and
only for part of the first year. In the third year Philip Marc
answered for the previous year as well, but there appears to be
suflScient evidence to date this Roll as of the second year.

The Close Roll of 2 Henry III. shows that on the 30th
October of that year the writs were i^ued for the first scutage
of that king ; the writs for his second scutage (Biham) are dated
the 19th February, 5 Henry III.

The Close Roll of 2 Henry III., m. 18, gives the writ for the

• J

THE FEODARY OF 2 HENRY III. 405

Sheriff of Oxford, commanding him without delay to aid the
Lord William Briwere (^the justice itinerant assigned to take
pleas, inquests, etc) to distrain the knights and free tenants
for their wards and fees, and all others who hold by military
service for rendering their scutage, two marks for each scutage,
which was imposed by the Common Counsel of the kingdom,
half of which was to be paid at the feast of St. Andrew in the
second year of the king, and the other half at the feast of
Hilary next following.

Similar writs were issued to many knights and barons who
had the privilege of assessing their own scutages. Amongst
others, to Hugh Mortimer, Gilbert de Clare, Earl Ferrars, Wm.
Albini, Wm. Marescal, Wm. de Mowbray for their lands in these
counties. Most of them had besides writs for their land in
other shires.

Wm. de Cantelupe, junior, had a writ for Nottingham.

Matilde de Caice (de Caus) had writs for Nottingham, Lincoln,
Northampton, Leicester, and York. Robert Roupel had a
writ to Nottingham with other places, so had Robert de Vipont
and the Abbot of Burgh (Peterborough).

Proof that this Roll is prior to 3 Henry III. can be obtained
from the second entry respecting Wheteley, which at this date
was in the king's hands. The Pipe Roll of 4 Henry HL recites
that it was then granted to Roger de Montebegonis, and Matilde
de Caus, here noted as being in the king s gift obtained her
freedom from persecution at the hands of mercenary suitors by
the payment of a large fine to the king in the third year of the
king.

There is a very interesting feature in this return ; it is, with
the exception of a fragment of a Roll dated the 32 Henry H.,
called the Lady's Roll, the first of its kind. The earlier Roll
unfortunately only contains the inquests for a few counties, of
which Derby is not one, but the similarity of the entries is
sufficient to indicate that the system here pursued was only
part of an ancient custom extending back to the days of
Domesday itself, and how much earlier we are only left to
conjecture, proof that the feudal system, the judicial system,
and the Parliamentary system were no novelties, as our modem
historians would pretend, but all portions of one great scheme
of government, to which William the Conqueror succeeded as

406 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

to his inheritance, and which he and his successors honourably-
respected and fairly carried out. The abuses of the Plantagenet
kings were the offspring of their own vices, and the only^
remedy sought by the barons and the people was a return to
the ancient system of their forefathers in which such abuses
found no place.

(DURING THE SHERIFFDOM OF PHILIP DE MARC.)

BASSETLAW WAPENTAKE.

Matilde de Chauc is in. the gift of the king, and the land
which she holds in this wapentake (Bassetlawe) is worth
£i^ OS. 6d. (Her husband died 3 John, and she died ante 8
Henry III.)

Fol. 71. The Manor of Wetheley is an escheat of the king
of Ralf Taisson, who held it of the Countess of Ewe, and it is
worth £26 per annum.

(In 4 Henry III. this manor was granted to Roger de Monte-
begonis. Close Roll for that year m 12.)

THURGARTON WAPENTAKE.

Matilde de Chauz is in the donation of the king, and her
land in this wapentake (Thurgarton) is worth £S 2s. and one
pound of pepper, and one pound of cinnamon, and one ounce of
(sericum),

(In 3 Henry III. she paid 60 m. for having her own land.)

The Lady Amflis of Roldiston, widow of Jollan de Neville,
held her land in the wapentake of Thurgarton of the Honor
of Richmond ; it was worth 10 m. per annum, but the jurors do
not know whether she is in the king's gift or of that of the
Earl of Chester.

Emma de Belfou is in the donation of the king, and her
lands in this wapentake are worth ;^2a Ludham with its socs.

Reginald de Colwic holds the vill of Colwic by sergeanty, by
the service of finding 12 arrows, and that land is worth lOOs.

(This Reginald de Colwick died 36 Henry III., and he was
said to be then over lOO years old.)

BINGHAM WAPENTAKE.
The heirs of Gervase de Wiverton ought to be in the king's
custody, and Philip Marc, SheriflF of Nottingham, has the cus-
tody of the land and of the heirs by the gift of the king, and

THE FEODARY OF 2 HENRY HI. 407

it is worth c shillings. And Sarra, the widow of the same
Gervase, is in the donation of the king. (She had the possession
of the fee and the custody of the heir by the grant of the
same sheriff.)

The town of Bingham is an escheat of the king of the
lands of the Normans, and Colwin de Lectris and his brother
have that land of the Lord King, and likewise of King John,
father of the Lord King, and it is worth jQ^o per annum.

The town of Langar is of the Honour of Peverel of Notting-
ham. Rad de Rhodes holds the manor, and it is worth jQ^o
per annum.

Clifton with its soc is an escheat of the king of the Honour of
Peverel of Nottingham, and is worth £4^ per annum, and Ralf de
Rhodes holds it of the king by the service of half a knight's fee.

BROCULSTOW WAP.

The heir of Walter de Strelly holds his land of the Honour
of Peverel, and Philip de Strelly has the custody of that land,
and this by the gift of Gauf de Mandevill, to whom King John
gave that wardship. That land is worth c. s., out of which
Cecilia, the widow of Walter, has one third for her dower.

(FoJ. 72.) Agatha de Cokefield is in the donation of the
king ; her land is at Nuttall, of the Hon. of Peverel, of Notting-
ham, and worth 24s. per annum.

The Church of Bulwell is in the gift of the king, and Henry
de Nottingham, Canon of Sewell, holds it, but the jury know
not through whom. The Manor of Bulwell is an escheat of the
king of the Honour of Peverel, and Philip Marc, the sheriff,
says that he holds that manor by the gift of King John.

The town of Lindeby is an escheat of the Hon. of Peverel,
of Nottingham, and William de St Michael, of London, holds
half of that vill of the gift of King John, paying yearly to the
king one grey pelise, and that half is worth jQy 6s. ; and Peter
de Lectres and his father hold the other half by the consent of
the king, at the king's will, and it is worth £7 6s.

NOTTINGHAM.
The land of Teobald Moneter, of Nottingham, is an escheat
of the king, and the wife of Theobald holds it, paying half a
mark annually, and Henry de Grey was her attorney for the
said service to Philip Marc, and that land paid half a mark
to the Exchequer.

^t08 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Gilbert Gluton holds certain land with a certain bakery in the
town of Nottingham, worth 40s., for the service of warning
the Jurors, and carrying the writs of the king through both
counties of Nottingham and Derby, at his own expense.

DERB HIGH PEAK.

The Castle of High Peak is an escheat of the Hon. of Peverel,
and the Earl of Ferrar holds it with the whole of the forest,
so that the servants of the forest are answerable to the earl
himself, as they were -before responsible to the king.

The Church of High Peak is in the gift of the king, and Wm.
de Furnell had it of the gift of King John.

(Fol. 73.) The vill of Bathecwill (Bakewell) is in the gift of
the king, and Ralf Gernon had it of the gift of King Richard,
and it is worth ^^"16 per annum.

The town of Glossop is in the donation of the king, and King
Henry gave it to the monks of Basingworth, and it is worth
;^io per annum.

The town of Cruchull is in the gift of the king, and King
John gave it to the Canons of Wellebec ; it is worth 255. per
annum.

The Earl of Ferrars had the Manor of Wirks worth with the
soc of the gift of King John, who pays ^^124 annual rent there-
for into the Exchequer.

REPENDON WAP.

Magister Simon de Waltham holds the Church of Melbum
of the gift of King John, who granted it as well as King Henry.
They know not whether it was so given by reason of the custody
which they had in the Bishopric of Carlisle, or in what other
manner.

The Countess of Chester, the mother of the earl, is in the
donation of the king ; her land in this wapentake is worth
£S per annum.

The Manor of Bolsover, with its soc, is an escheat of the
king of the Honour of Peverel, and William Earl Ferrars holds
it of the gift of King John.

NOTTINGHAM.
The heirs of Ralf Eraser hold half a fee in Ancstan Parva.
Michael de Malnowers holds two knights' fees in Nottingham
and one in Yorkshire, of the king in chief of the gift of Stephen

THE FEODARY OF 2 HENRY III. 409

Earl Morton. (It is very rarely that any grant of this king is
acknowledged.) The Lady of Flintham holds one knight's fee
in chief of the king of the gift of the said Stephen.

William fil William holds ij carucates of land in Warebere
of the king, paying one fleet hound (bracket*), one greyhound
(velusam), and two cords (liniha ), and one auriclam' (qy. head
gear for a hound), but he does no service now, and it is not
known by what warrant (he holds the land).

(F. 74.) Ralf de St George and Richard de Furnell hold
one fee in chief of the king in Bethemeshull. The heir of
Ranulf de Maresia three fees (two fees in Nottingham and one
in Hoiland).

The town of Nottingham ought to pay to the Honour of
Lancaster c. shillings per annum, and the town of Derby c.
shillings, which the Earl of Ferrars now receives, and the Sheriff
of Lancaster has no warrant for it.

(It is difficult to understand these entries, and how the Earl
of Lancaster ever had power to exact these .sums from these
towns. No earl of that county has existed since the date of
Roger de Foictou, and it is not on record that he had any
power over them. He was for some reason closely connected
with Roger de Busli, who was the chief landowner in these
counties, and possibly it was that through his influence
Ingelram and his family obtained the sheriffdom. The chief
point of interest, however, is to ascertain how anyone but the
king could exact a rent, if these places, as it is contended, were
of the ancient demesne of the Crown. This entry would appear
to dispose of this pretension. The entries in the Pipe Rolls
already given would seem to refer to these payments.)

William de Gresley holds Drakelow in chief, and renders a
bow without a string, and one (quiver) with Tutsbir, and twelve
arrows and one shaft (buszone). (In Dorset, Ralf de Stopham
held lands by the service of finding a lad (garcon) bearing a
bow without a string, and one busonem without wings (pennis).
(Compare the entry of the tenure of this manor by the Earl
Ferrars.)

William fil Walkelin held Steynesby, with its appurtenances,

rendering yearly a sore hawk, of the gift of King Henry II.

(This entry would seem to be of a much earlier date ; see

Note respecting this knight.)
28

410 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Galf de Coteston holds one fee in chief of the king in Thorpe
in Staffordshire, for which he made knight service. (This knight
had been long dead.)

Earl Roger holds Sthanham in chief (but the service is
unknown) ; they say it is held in socage, and the fee of Hugo
Ruff for three knights* fees of the king, in chief.

Wills Esturmi, three knights' fees in chief, but only does the
service of two.

Adam de Ottele, two knights' fees in chief.

Adam de Glaydon and Hugo de Hage, half a fee.

Roger de Muriell, one fee of the fee of Busselo', which is in
the hands of the king.

Thomas de Multon holds three-parts of one fee in Thur-
stanton.

Gilbert de Cantwall holds a quarter of one fee in the same vilL

Wm. Herin, half a fee in Boxhide.

Wm. de Huntingfield, one fee in Menda of the king in chief

Osbert de Wathesham, quarter of a fee in Culfo in fee.

William de Verdon, quarter of a fee.

Masgia de Hastings, one fee in Thorpe.

Ansellus de Newton holds of the heir of Theobald Walter the
seventh part of one knight's fee.

The heir of William Ceresi, the one-twentieth part of a fee in
Gretington, but makes no service to the king. (These last 15
entries are given in the Testa as part of Nottingham ; why is
not explained.)

(INQUISITION TAKEN THE 12TH & 13TH HENRY III.)

(Fo. ICG.) The following Roll is clearly of the 12th or the
13th Henry III. Ralf fil Nicolas succeeded Philip Marc as
sheriff in 9 Henry III., and in 12th and 13th, and several
later years of that king, Hugo le Bel was his under-sheriff, he
was identical with Hugh fil Ralf mentioned above. Hugh fil
Ralf appears on the Roll of 12 Henry III., paying his relief
that year for the inheritance of his wife, Agnes de Gresley;
and the same year John de Stuteville obtained possession of his
manor, which, up to that time, and during half that year, and
in the king's hands since the death of Leonia de Stuteville,
this same year, 12 Henry III., Mathew de Hathersage and
Adam de Credling obtained their moietifes of the estate of

THE FEODARY OF 12 HENRY HI. 41 1

Robert de Meynil, one of the Stuteville tenants. The entries
which follow cannot be earlier than this year.

The fact that the following year the scutage of Kerry was
collected, dates this Roll tolerably clearly as that of the 12th
or 13th of the king.

(Fol. 100.) The Countess of Augo (Eu) has nothing in these
counties in demesne, but has the services of 39S and I knights*
fees, of which 33J pay annually £17 17s. lod. towards keeping
the castle of Tickhill ; that is, each fee paid los. 8d. for guarding
the castle, and the other 5^ and J fees had no services except
scutages and reliefs, when they occurred.

(Fo. loi.) John de Stuteville held Kirkby, which was worth
;i^24 i6s. 6d., and Heckington, which was worth ;^33, and
Barton, worth ^£23; Bradmer, worth ;^8. He also paid gi and
i fees, which were held of him by Galfry Barre, Alexander
de Wandesly, Richard de Herthill and Reginald de Insula,

Mathew de Hathersage, Adam de Gridling, the Abbot of
Welbec, Henry de Morisburg, Robert de Torcat, four bovates
of land by the service of carrying the banners of their Lord
before the army when in Wales.

Thomas Picot holds a serjeanty in Ratcliff, of which divers
portions are sold.

Richard de Sandiacre held a fee in Sandiacre, Thurmeston,
Staunton, and Kyrkhale, and in the town of Derby, and Sutton.

This Roll cannot be earlier than 11 or 12 Henry HI.; for
John de Stuteville paid his relief that year.

INQUISITION TAKEN THE 21ST HENRY III. (Fo. 83.)

The following document can only be dated approximately.
It follows in the Testa the returnsof 12-15 John ; but it is clearly
much later than that period, for Oliva, widow of Roger
Montebegon, held Oswardebec, and the Patent Rolls of 10
Henry III. show that it was granted to her in that year. On
the other hand, it must be earlier than 22 Henry III., for Henry
de Hastings then had a grant of Oswardebec from the king
that year ; again, the son and heir of Leonius Malnewers who
is in the king's gift, and Leonius was living in 18 Henry III.,
Pipe Roll of that year. The probability therefore is, that this is
a return of the 2ist Henry III. This writ is already given ; but
see the last part of this entry, which is of the 26th of the king.

\

412 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

OF THE CUSTODIES OF THE SERJEANTIES,
CHURCHES, AND OTHER (PROPERTY) WHICH
ARE OF THE DONATION OF THE KING IN
THE COUNTY OF NOTTINGHAM (FoL. 83).

54, — Oschinton, with its soke, is in the demesne (dnicu ?) of
the king, and of the value per ann. £4,0. Wm. de Albini holds
it by the year of the gift of King John. (This was Wm. Albini
of Bel voir, who died 27 Henry III.)

Langar and Berneston are of the escheats of the king, and
worth per ann. £40. Rad de Rhodes (living 6 Henry III.),
holds them^.

The land of Richard Wiverton is of the donation of the king,
and worth per ann. 10 m. The same Richard had that land by
Philip Marc.

The vill of Wetely is an escheat, and worth £"^0. Nic de
Lectris holds it of the gift of King John.

Oliva, wo. of Roger Montebegon, holds Oswardebec, which
is of the gift of the king, by the gift of the king, and it is
worth per ann. jQ^o 19s. The same Oliva is marriageable
(maritanda), and is of the donation of the king. (This lady died
10 Henry III). 22 Henry III. her heirs held Oswardebec (Ch.
Roll m 9).

Galfr Gyunv holds iocs, of the same land, and Galfr Nevil
nine marcs of the gift of Roger de Montebegonis.

Capella de Retford should be in the gift of the king. Robert
de Hampton and Thos. Clericus hold it, but (the jury) know
not how.

Malitismus (Malversinus) de Hersin and William Rufus were
summoned.

Sarra de Wiverton is in the donation of the king, and her
land is worth 5 m.

(Fo. 84.) The Cimrch of Bingham is in the gift of the king,
and the son of the Earl de Sauveye holds it by the grant of
the king.

Bingham is an escheat, and worth £40. Nic de Lectres held
it by the king's gift. (King John made this grant.)

The son and heir of Leonius de Malnewers (he was living 18

THE FEODARY OF 21 HENRY III. 413

Henry III., see Pipe Roll) is in the king's gift; his lands are
worth ;£io 8s. 8d. in Hulme. Ralf fil Nic holds by the king's
gift, and it is of the Honour of Lancaster. Julia, his mother, is
a widow, and in the king's gift ; her lands are worth £$ 4s. 4d.

The town of RadclifT is a serjeanty of the king by hawking
(de Ostricirie.) Thomas de Hedon holds it by the king's gift ;
it is worth 8^ marcs los. 22d,

Gervase fil Gervase de Rebacy held 3 bovates of land in Clifton
by serjeanty worth 15s. per annum.

Regin Marc holds 12 bovates of land in Thurmadeston by the
service of hawking (de Ostric), worth 60 shillings, which he
bought of Reginald Basset.

John de Leke holds 3 bovates, these by Ostricirie, and it is
worth 15s. He holds this by Rich de Rixton.

Barthon (Barton) Henry de Stuteville's is an escheat of the
lands of the Normans, and worth ;{^20 per annum. The Earl
Warren holds it (Leonia de Rennes had it 6 John). The land
of the same Henry in Bradmer is worth loos.

Huccenal is a serjeanty of the king's for keeping falcons,
and worth 8J m. Hugh fil William (post 2 Henry HI.) holds it.

The Church of Bulwell is in the king's gift. Henry Medicus
holds it, but it is unknown how.

The town of Bulwell is an escheat, and worth iocs, per annum.
Philip Marc holds it by King John's gift.

Reginald de Colwic holds by serjeanty of the king, rendering
12 arrows on the arrival of the king at Nottingham once a year.

(Fo. 85.) Emma de Bellofago is marriageable, and is in the
donation of the king. Her land is worth ;^20.

Wynnethorp is an escheat, and worth i;"i2. The Bishop of
Lincoln holds it of the gift of King John.

DERBYSHIRE.

Dna Margar de Asheford, widow of Wenhun Wynn, is mar-
riageable, and of the gift of the king. Her land is worth £y.

The Church of Peak is in the king's gift Wm. Forneys holds
it. Eda fil Reingod is in the king's gift. She was married to
Gilbert Draiton by Wm. de Ferrars, Earl of Derby, whilst he
had the custody of Melbourn. Her land is worth 7s. 66, — 1>.,
3 bovates of land.

Will de Vernon liolds in Ermelegh 11 marcs of land, and

414 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

2S. 4d, in Cotes of the fee of Lancaster for one fleet hound which
the land of Stephen de Belcap held. It is unknown by whom
he holds it

Ralf de Freschville holds ;fl2 of land of the gift of the king,
and Philip Marc has his marriage.

Ric de Sandiacre holds i^io of land in Sandiacre by serjeanty
of keeping hawks and finding 12 porters and himself for carry-
ing banners (ad ferend Taborem).

Philip Marc holds 8 acres of land of the same serjeanty,
and one meadow upon Irewys.

Hugh de Strelley holds 1 5 acres.

FEES OF THE HONOUR OF PEVEREL, IN THE
COUNTY OF NOTTINGHAM, BY RICH. MARTEL,
BAILIFF OF THE SAID HONOUR (7 NOV.
21 HENRY III. Fo. 57.)

Robert de Typetot held the Manor of Languar with its mem-
bers, with the homage of Robert Lutrel for Gamelston Manor,
and the homage of Gervase de Clifton for i fee for the Manor of
Clifton, of the king in chief for one knight's fee for each manor,
with suit of court at the Court of Peverel at Nottingham, from
three weeks to three weeks, by Henry fil Gervas of Wilford,
who holds his lands there by doing service.

(Fo. 58.) Henry de Grey holds the Manors of Codenhour,
Thoueton, and Radeclive for two and a half and an eighth part
of one fee for each manor, with suit, etc., at the Court of
Peverel, at Nottingham, every three weeks.

Wm. de Ros holds Gresley for i fee and the same suit.

John de Heriz holds the Manors of Goneliston and Wyd-
merpol for one fee and the like suit.

Robert de Strelley holds one fee in Strelley and Bilburc for
I fee and the like suit.

Step, de Pencest holds in Baseford i and i fee and the like
suit

Thos. de Cantelupe holds ^ a fee in the same vill, for which
he does no suit.

Robt. de Wathenow J vill of Wathenow for one fee and
service as above.

THE FEODARY OF 21 HENRY HI. 41$

Robt. de Novers holds in Estcolwyc ^ of one fee, with suit.

Roger de Morteyn holds Cossal and Wolloston for i fee, with
suit.

Robt. de Walton, Will de la Leyes, Prior of Wymundley,
and Robt Daft held a tenement (formerly Rad de Bellocampo)
in Beston for one fee, with like service. •

Hugh de Heris and John fil John held one fee in Stapelford,
with service by the said Hugh.

Henry de Wodburgh, son and heir of Rad de Wodburgh, and
his co*partner, holds half a fee in Wudburgh, with like service.

John de Mendham, Roger de Coston, John le Paum', and
Henry de Cotgrave hold in Wiverton one-fourth of one fee, and
all do service.

(Fo. 59.) Wm. de Sibtorp holds in Sibthorpe J of a fee
with service.

Cecilia, daughter of Seman Stokes, holds in Staunton ^ of a
fee, with suit

Robt de Aldisworth holds half the town of Aldisworth, with
suit

Wm. de Colwyc holds Colwyk with part of Wylleby, with
suit.

Nic de Birchwood does service for eight bovates in Bramcote.

Roger de Brinesley holds Brinesley, and does service as above.

John Passeys holds his tenements in Sutton by serjeanty,
and does service.

OF KNIGHTS' FEES AND OF THOSE HOLDING
THEM OF THE HONOUR OF PEVEREL IN
DERBYSHIRE. (Fo. 59.)

Reginald de Grey holds the Manor of Shirland for i fee.

John de Heriz holds Winefield, Tibeshelf, and Oxcroft for
2 fees, with service at the Court of Peverel at Nottingham every
three weeks.

Robt. de Wyn holds Normanton and Penkeston for one
knight's fee, with suit as above.

John de Langford and Walter de Gousel hold Kinewalde-
mersh and Totley for i fee, with suit by John.

Roger le Breton holds Walton for i fee with suit

4l6 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Simon de Glapwell half a fee in Glapwell and does suit
Anthos. de Beck holds ^ a fee in Glapwell of the fee of
Thos. de Glapwell, with suit by the said Thomas.

60. — Robert de Strelley holds one fee in Stretley of the
king in chief, 40s.

Abbot de la Dale los. for J of a fee of Rad de Mortimer,
who holds of the king.

Peter fil Osbert 8s. for one-fifth at Stanton.

Rich de Wiverlon 8s. for one-fifth of one fee.

Robt le Vavasor 20s. for i a fee in Bilburg.

Rad de Frescheville 2 fees in Boney, J a fee in Barton and
Ke worth, and one-tenth of a fee in Bradmer, 104s.

Reg de Annesley 40s. for i fee of the fee of the said Rad
de Fresh vi lie.

John Orreby 40s. for I fee of the said Rail.

Robt. Dethec los. for } of a fee of same Ralf.

Abb of Derley £4 for 2 fees of same Ralf.

Rad de Freshville ;^4 for 2 fees in Scarclive.

Roger de Somville 40s. for one fee of same Ralf.

Roger de Cokefield los. for i of a fee of the custody of
Alfreton.

Hugh fil Ralf 40s. for 1 fee in Gresley, which he holds of the
king in chief.

John de Bellocampo 40s. for one fee in Beston, held in chief.

Roger de Watenhow 20s. for half a fee of the custody of
Alfreton.

Henry de Birchwood ^ m. for one-sixth of one fee of same
custody.

Wm. de Wudburgh 20s. for J fee of same.

Ran le Poer 40s. for ^ a knight's fee of same Honour, and los*
for J of another fee of same.

HONOUR OF PEVEREL.
(Fol. 61.) Galf de Stapleford 40s. for one fee of the Honour of
Peverel.

Cecilia de Meynel i fee do.

The Vill of Glapwell i fee do.

Roger le Breton 30s., 3 parts of i fee do.
John de Orreby 30s., do. do.

Will de Riseley 20s., i a fee of Rad Mortimer.

THE FEODARY OF THE 26 HENRY HI. 417

Wm. de Trowell I m. for one-third of one fee of the same.

Rad<le Normanvill 12s. 5d. for { and oneseventeeth of one
fee in chief.

Wm. Morteyn 40s. for one fee in chief.

Robt. le Sauvage c. s. for 2j fees of Roger Mumbray in Egrum.

John Torcard j£4 for 2 fees of Hugh Wake.

The men of Lekeburn 20s. for half a fee of same fee.

Robert de Coshall los. for a quarter of one fee of the fee
of Regin de Annesly.

John de Grey 40s. for one fee of the fee of Cod nor.

Isolde de Grey l los. for two and three-parts of one fee of the
same fee.

Mathew Haverseth £4 for two fees of the fee of John de
Stutcville.

Galf Barre 33s. 4d. for five parts of one fee of the same fee.

John de Stuteville ;6^I4 for seven fees in chief

Robert Daft los. for a quarter of a fee of the fee of Robert
Pavelly.

Galf de Bakepuz 30s. for three-parts of one fee of the same fee.

Galf de Wyldebuf ^ m. for the one-sixth part of one fee of the
fee of Galf Barre.

Wm. Rosel 40s. for one fee of the fee of Wm. de Percy.

Robert de Lathum 20s. for half a fee of the fee of the Earl of
Leycester.

This account is true, and the reckoning upon which the
sheriff passed the talliage before the barons on the fifteenth
day from St. Michael's day, in the 36th year.

(FOL. 62.) THESE, INDEED, WHO HAD WRITS FOR
HAVING SCUTAGE, DID NOT ENGAGE TO
HAVE INQUISITION MADE OF THE KNIGHTS'
FEES WHICH 'WERE HELD BY THEM.

The Archbishop of York has his scutage by writ of the king,
the Bishop of Lincoln, as well as the following : — The Countess
of Eu, Robert de Everingham, Nic de Moels, Oliver de Eyncourt,
Galf Dispens, Gilbert de Gaunt, William de Albini, Peter de
Sabaudia, William Bardolf, Gerard de Oddingselles, Hugo de
Albinaco, Andrew Luttrel, William Marescal, and Peter de
Chawurces {} Sacheverel).

41 8 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

THE EARL OF FERRARS GAVE SECURITY TO
SATISFY THE SCUTAGE, BUT HIS BAILIFF
WOULD NOT PERMIT THE SHERIFF TO
ENTER WITHIN HIS LIBERTY TO MAKE IN-
QUIRIES OF HOW MANY KNIGHTS' FEES
WERE HELD OF HIM.

(FOL. 89.) THE AID FOR THE MARRIAGE OF THE
SISTER OF KING HENRY III. (21 HENRY III.).

Robert de Toke and Robert de Achore (Akover) (Will de la
Lee for them assigned) accounted for collecting the aid of the
king conceded to him ; that is to say, the scutage of two marcs
for ancient as well as for new fees for the marriage of the sister
of the king to the Roman Emperor, for the following fees : —

The Earl of Ferrars, Wm. Bardolf, Wm. Briwere, the mother
of Rich de Grey, Hugo fil Ralf, John de Heriz, Henry Tuchet,
Ralf Freschville, John de Stuteville, John Ayncourt, Ralf
fil Nicolas, for the fees of Robert fil William and Eustace de
Mortain, Robert Pavelli, Roger le Bretun, Rad Gernun, Oliver
Deincourt, Wm. Bassett, Senescal Mahaut, the Earl of Arundel,
Ralf fil Nicolas. Sum, i^iio 19s. id.

This is the receipt of Sir Robert de Akover, Sir Robert de
Touk, and Sir Robert de Dun (who was added after the death
of Sir Robert de Akover), for the king's scutage.

(Then follows a repetition of this account.)

In the Yorkshire Roll for 21 Henry III. we find the following,
chiefly relating to Notts, and Derbyshire families : —

(F0L.670.) HONOUR OF TICKILL.

Alexander de Villers and Will de Chaucis* collectors render
composition of the aid granted to the king for marrying his
sister to the Roman Emperor, assessed at two marcs (21
Henry III).

Wm. de Boves 2 m. for one fee, Nigel de Luvetot 4 fees,
Emma de Bellofago i, Richard Putrel I, John Stuteville 4^,
Simon de Hedon and Gervase de Huvetorp 2, Alice de
Cameton i, Thomas fil William 2, William le Butiler i, Henry
de Ecring i, Henry de Tuke i, Wm. de Bevercotes i, Philip de
Tyly I, Mauvesyii and William Rapes 2, John* de Eton J,

THE AID OF 21 HENRY IH*

419

Robert de Alfreton and John de Eton i, Matilde de Luvetot 5,
Stephen Maluvel i, Dna de Stirap i, Thomas Barboc |, Roger
Monachus i, Roger de Cressy ij, William de Cressi 2 parts of
I, Ralf fil Nicolas 2, John de Stuteville loj, heirs of William
de Sandeby i and r^. Sum, £64 14s. i Jd.

We now come to two fragments of the same inquest, or rather
duplicates in part ; the first headed Knights' Fees in the County
of Nottingham, and being transcribed upon pages 86 to 90,
and the second following it from page 91 to page 93, which is
not nearly no full. It has, however, the advantage of being
entitled, " Rad de Villers and William de Chaucis' Collectors :
make composition of the aid granted to the king in the County
of Nottingham, for marrying his sister to the Roman Emperor,
two marcs for each fee."

KNIGHTS' FEES IN THE COUNTY OF NOTTING-
HAM, ASSESSED AT TWO MARCS. (21 HENRY

III.) (FOL. 86 TO 90, AND 91 TO 93).

(Fo. 86.) The Honour

. OF

Lancaster —

Pagan de Vilers

held

I fee

in Newbolt

Walter de Staunton

Crophill.

The Monks of Swineshead

Cotgrave.

Galfry, Monachus

Flintham.

Leonius de Malnuers

Holm.

Ran fil Roger (de Maresia)

2

Gamelston.

Robert de Furneus and Ralf de

•

St George

I

Bodmershill.
Sum ;f 10 13s. 4d.

Fees of the King —

Wm. Albini

2

Hoskington and
Screveton.

Robt. de Lexington

I

Tuxford.

The Honour of Peverel-

-

Rad de Rhodes

I

Langar.

Rich de Wiverton

1

Wiverton.

John de Heriz

li

Gonaldeston.

Reginald de Mendrei

2

Radclive, Toueton,
and Chilwell.

420

THE TESTA DE NEVir..

Wills Maylard
Eustace de Moretain

held

Rich de Riebof

Hugo de Insula

John de Bateford (Harreby) 3 parts of I

Hugh de Watenhou

Rad de Wodburg

Robt. de Strelly

Miles de Bellocampo and Richard i

Agatha de Niitall

Galfr de Stapelford

Hugo fil Ralf (Roger)

Peter de Goldington

Robt. de la Sauce

Rad Gousel

Jord de Coliston

Will and Walt Croc

Will de Heriz

Gerard de Fancourt

(Fo. 87.) Hugh de Hoveringham

Henry fil Thos.

Adam de St. Maria

Galf de Jorz (Gyfortz)

Hugh de Hoveringham

Rich de Anestan (Beeston)

Annoria Deincourt

Malger de Stanton

Robt. de Stoke i.

Roes (Ralf) Torkard

The Honor of Deincourt —

Philip de Cortingstock

The Prior of Lenton and Alan

Malet
John Bachard (Bossard)
Alured de Sulney
Robt. Patric

I fee

in Sutton.

I

Coshall & Wllave-

ton.

i

Bilburgh.

i

Thorpe.

ts of I

Basford.

i

Watenhou.

i

Wudburg.

i

Strelly.

I

Beston.

i

Nutall.

I

Stapelford.

I

Gresley.

i

Col wye.

i

Stainton.

Sum ;£'i8 15s. 4d.

i

Flintham.

i

Coliston.

'i

i

Wivertoi).

I

Hickling.

2

Hoveringhan).

h

Rolleston & Kelum.

I

Bulcote.

I

Birton.

'i

Birton.

1

Horspol.

i

Knapethorpe.

i

Stanton.

I, and

J Stoke, Granby, and

Sutton.

2

Hucknaland Lamb-

cote.

2

Cortingstock.

I

Cotgrave.

I

Bachardstorp.

I

Brocton.

I

Bunigton.

THE AID OF 21 HENRY HI.

421

Adam de Novomercato held

Abb (Alan) de RufTord
Robt de Touk de Leyk
Ralf Basset, of the fee of

Richard Ridel
Thos. Sanson, of the fee of

Lynsey

Walter de Hayra

Walter de Wyldeker
Richard fil Will de Birton
Wm. Bardolf
Wm. de Bovis
Nigel de Luvitot
Emma de Bellofago
Rich Piterel
John de Stuteville
Simon de Hedon and
Gervase de Huvetorp
Warinus de Basingbourne
Alice de Knyveton
Thos. fil William

}

(Fo. 88.) Wm. de Botiler

Hy. de Eicring

Hy. de Tuke

Wm. de Bevercotes

Phus de Tilly

Malvesinus and Wm. Rufus

John de Heton

Robt. de Wlrington

Matilde de Luvitot

Stephen Maluvel

Dna de Stirap

Thos. Barbot

Roger Monachus

Roger de Cressi

Wm. de Chauuc

3 fees in Watton and Hokes-

worth.
I Hekerington.'

I Leik.

I Colston.

3i

Eperston and Wod-

burgh.

i

Coton (of the Hon.

of Dover).

1

Sireston.

I
TV

Birton.

2h

Stoke and Gedling.

I

Cortingstoc.

4

Wysowe.

I

Ludham.

I

Thurinodeston.

4i

Barton and Kirk by.

2

Huvetorp.

I

Bridgeford.

i

Knyveton.

2

Plumtree and Ch'p-

ston.

I

Hocreton.

I

Eicring.

I

Kelum.

I

Bevercotes.

I

Hopton.

2

Grave and Weston.

i

Heton.

I

Wlrington.

5

Wirksop & Gringel.

I

Rampton.

I

Stirap.

1

T

»

I

Stretton,

li

2 parts

of I.

422

THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

4. and J

I

of I.

Trowell, fee of Morton.

I

Sutton

do.

3 parts of i

I

Lessington, Chau:
Bingham.

z Barony.

2

I
I
I

Egrum, Barony of Mowbray.
Egmanton do.
Serleby do.
Fuilungl do.
Landeford do.

in Kelvinton.

i

Carlton Gedling.

•

Ralf fil Nicolas (for one term) in Derbyshire, 2 m.

John de Stuteville (for one term) „ loj m.

Rad de Freshville

Richard de Trowell

Rich fil Godfrey

Robt. de Everingham

Wm. de Fer

Henry Hosee

John Deyvill

Matilde de Moles

Roger fil Richard

Rich de Grey

Rad Morin (Norman)

Wm. de Sandeby

Robt. de Everingham

(Fo. 90.) Ralf Villers and Wm. de Chauces' collectors
accounted for the aid (auxilium) granted to the king in the
county of Nottingham for marrying his sister to the Roman
Emperor ; that is to say, for each fee two marks.

Wm. Bardolfe, 5 m. of the 2j fees.

(Fo. 91.) Pagan de Vilers Hon. Lane. 2 m. for i fee.

Walter de Stanton do.

Abbot de Swinestead do.

Galf Monachus do.

Leoni de Manueres do.

Ran fil Roger do.

Robt. Furnel and Rad de St. George 2 m. i fee.

Sum ;^io 13s. 4d.
Rad de Rhodes. This is the same as page 86.

The other record terminates differently.

It is as follows: —

(Fo. 93.) Sm ;f44 2S. 4d.

Sum of the whole surplus allocated, ;£'i6i lis. 9Jd., and
owes £S IIS. 9jd., which ought to be required of the under-
written : Stephen de Segrave 2 m., John de Stuteville loj m.,
and owes the collectors 5s. fd.

Aid of the Prelates granted to the king upon his going into
Vascony in the twenty-sixth year of his reign : Abbey of Derle
5 m., Prior of Rependen 403;, Prior of Lenton 10 m.. Prior of

2 m. for

2 m.

2 m.

2 m.

2 m.

4 m. for 2 fees.

THE AID OF 21 HENRY HI. 423

BIythe 5 m., Prior of Thurgarton 403., Prior of Worksop 40s.,
Prior of Shelford 2 m.

There is at folio 55 a list of knights' fees which are held in
the Counties of Nottingham and Derby, the tenants of which
have no writs for paying scutage ; that is, of those knights and
freemen who were assessed by the king's Justices, assisted by
the sheriff (25-7 Henry III).

Robert de Strelley one fee, (In the time of King John he
held half a fee of Walter Riebof, part of the escheated fee of
William Peveril.)

Abbey de la Dale a {,

(Fo. 56.) Peter fil Osbert, in Stanton, i.

Richard de Wiverton i (he died ante 37 Henry III. See
escheat).

Robert le Vavasor J in Bilburg.

Radus Fressonville 2 fees in Boney, i in Burton and
Keyworth, i-^ in Bradmere, (He was an infant in 6 Henry III.,
when his mother, the co-heir of Fitz Ralf, died, and seems to
have succeeded to his Barony in 25 Henry III. This last,
therefore, would seem to prove that the return cannot be of an
earlier date.)

Reginald de Anesley, i.
John de Orreby, i.
Robert de Thoc, {.
Abbot de Derley, 2.

Rad de Fressonville, 2 fees in Scardclive.
Roger de Somerville, i.
John de Cokefeud \ in Alfreton.

Hugh fil Ralf, i in Gresley (he paid his relief at Gresley 12
Henry III).
John de Bellocampo, I in Beston.
Roger de Watenhow, i.
Hugh de Birchwood, -y*
Will de Wudburc, i.
Ran le Poer, i^.

Galf de Stapelford of the Honour de Peak, i
Cecila de Meynil of the same, i.
Vill de Glapwell, i.
Roger de Breton, 3 parts of i.

424 • THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

John de Orreby, 3 parts of i.

William de Riseley, J, of the Barony of Mortimer (this was
in Bramcote).

Wills de Trowell, \ part of i.

Rad de Normanville Jth and Tt^h,

Wm. de Morteyn, i.

(Fo. 57.) Robt le Sauvage, ^ in Egrum (10 Henry III.
Robert le Sauvage, of Steynesby, had a lease of Egrum for
his life, which he sold to Robert de Lexington).

John Torchard, 2 (this was in Huckenal, which he held of
Dame Johanna Wake ; he also held Mclburn (?) in Derbyshire,
of Buron's fee. — Thoroton.)

The Men of Kyleburn, J.

Robert de Corhal, J.

John de Grey, i (and 56 Henry HI., holding Ratcliff, etc).

Isolda de Grey, 3 fees, and 3 parts of i. (This would seem
to date the record as not later than 30 Henry HI., this lady,
mother of John, having died this year. She is said to have
been the daughter of Hugh Bardolf ; she re-married Reginald
Mendre.)

Matthew de Haverseth, 2.

Galf Barre, \.

John de Stut^ille, 7 fees.

Robert Daft, ^th.

Galf de Bakepuz, 3 parts of i.

Galf de Wildbof, ith.

William Rosel, i. (He held a fee in Worksop of Robert de
Lexington, 29 Henry HI).

John de Latham, J.

ROBERT PASSELEWS SERJEANTIES (C 27

HENRY HL FoL. 65).

These serjeanties in the Testa de Nevil are recorded
immediately after the scutage of 21 Henry HL, but like so
many other of these records, they are manifestly out of place.
Robert Passilew seems to have adjudicated upon a great number
of serjeanties in different counties, and in some, or one of them,
a date is given ; but it cannot be certainly fixed for the date of
this Inquisition, because Passelcw was evidently a Judge of
Assize, and he must have been several years travelling his

THE FEODARY OF 2/ HENRY HI. 425

Circuit ; and it is difficult to obtain an approximate date, for
the tenants, for the most part were persons of small note, and
only remarkable because they were tenants of the Crown, and
nothing further is known about the great majority of the
names. It is clear, from the Inquest of Hucknal, that this
return is later than 2 Henry III., for Hugh fil Coste held the
greater part of it, and he paid his relief that year.

The serjeanty of Colwic shows that it was not later than
36 Henry III., for Reginald de Colwick was then living.

It is clearly later in date than the serjeanty which has been
attempted to be dated as 2 Henry III., for these reasons.

The serjeanty of Sutton was then held by Robert Passeis;
in this William is the tenant The serjeanty of Brunesley
was held by Galf de Brunesley in the Inquest of 2 Henry III.,
called de Trowell. In this it is held by Gilbert.

Reginald de Colwick still held that serjeanty ; but as he lived
to be 100 years old, and only died 36 Henry III., he only gives
us that outside limit Hugo Rl Coste still held Hucknal.

Thomas Picot held Ratcliff. He had free warren in 37
Henry III. He usually resided at Hedon, in Essex, by which
name his family were frequently called. The only other
serjeanties mentioned in the Inquest of 2 Henry III. are those of
Roger de Lanum and Hugo fil Robert, the latter, who held in
Clayworth, and the former in Tilney, soc to Oswardebeck,
who are not mentioned here ; and Wennunwin, Prince of Wales
(a Peverel). He had a large holding (;^30) of land in the first
period, but * there is no indication where it i.s. No doubt
he held Ashford and Oswardebec ; but he seems to have
been imprisoned for a long period. (See Pipe Rolls of 2
Edward I.)

It is notable that the serjeanty of Sandiacre is omitted from
this first return, and possibly Wenuwyn may have held it between
the tenure by that family and by William de Grey, whose
interest in that serjeanty has not been fully accounted for.

This Inquest is very greatly superior to that of any of the

others in respect of the minute details of the return, a very

large number of persons who had bought parcels within it

being given. In the serjeanty of Sandiacre especially are to be

found many good names, and, amongst others, that of Wm. de

Grey, the after lord. He, however, at this period, only seems
29

426 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

to have held a toft, which Richard fitz John formerly held
worth 6d.

Peter, senr. (Sandiacre ?) is said to have held four bovates in
Kirkhalum of this serjeanty ; and Mapperly, in this manor, was
held in 1235 by Richard de Sandiacre, which would show that
this Roll is not earlier than 19 Henry III., inasmuch as the Pipe
Roll of 3 Henry HI. shows that Peter de Sandiacre was then
dead, unless a second Peter intervened. There is danger of
confusing this return with the former one. Mathew de Sandiacre
also held three bovates in the latter period.

Eustace fil Eustace and his son John held a certain place in
Derby of the same serjeanty, and Isolda fil Eustace (possibly
de Grey) another place there. Now if these are the Morteyns,
it is very possible that Isolda de Grey may be of that family,
and not a Bardolf. And there are a great number of great
names in this place — fitz Fulk, de la Haye, fitz Nigel, fitz Peter,
tie Leke, Ingram, Vavasor, Stoke, Stapelford, Essex — which, if
they are only the well-known personages bearing similar names,
show that this serjeanty must have been of great value. The
mere rents amount to over £16^ so that it may well have formed
the valuable serjeanty of Prince Wennuwin (Peverel.)

It appears from page 445 of the Testa that Robert Passelew
was assigned to assize for the Vascony Roll of 27 Henry III.,
and perhaps this is the true date of this record. If not, that
Inquest would appear to be missing.

(FOL. 63.) THE SERjEANTIES SET AT RENT
(ARENTATIS) BY ROBERT PASSELEWE IN THE
TIME OF HENRY THE KING, SON OF KING
JOHN.

The serjeanty of Walter de Marisco in Cotinton, for which
he owed the king one pair of boots (calegarum) of scarlet
(Thoroton translates this breeches;, but it is wholly alienated.

The Prior of St. Catherine's, Lincoln, held therein 22 bovates
of land, worth £4 8s. per annum, for which he fined 40s, per
annum.

THE FEODARY OF 27 HENRY HI. 427

SERJEANTY OF SANDIACRE.

Robert le Bay held two water mills in Derby, and fined to
pay £j\ per annum, and besides, he pays rent to William de
Bredsale 40s. at certain terms. One place in Derby which
Eustace fil Eustace and John, his son, holds worth los., he
made a fine of 5s. per annum at the same term.

Isolda fil Eustace one place in the same, and 12 a. of land
worth 40s. ; she offered a fine of ^5, and the following tenants
for their several tenancies made the following fines.

William fil Peter, 7 bovates and 4 tofts, fine i marc

(Fo. 64.) — Henry Juvenis, i mess, 2s.

Robert Bissop and Hugh le Champneys, i mess, 2s.

Nigel Bars, i mess, 2s.

Hugo fil Ralf, I mess, 3s.

Henry Raven, and Matilde, his wife, i mess and 2 a. land,

2S.

Roger de Essex, 8 bovates of land and 4 a. of meadow,
20S.

Mathew de Sandiacre, 3 bovates, los.

Galf de Stoke, 6 bovates of land and 1 toft, 20s.

Hugh de Stapelford, 2 bov. and 3 a., 2 tofts, ^ m.

Peter Fabre, 2 bov., i ac, I r., and i toft, J m.

Wm. fil Peter de Derby, 2 bov., 5s.

Hugh fil Nigel, 2 bov., i rod, for J m.

Abb de la Dale, 15 bov., with a wood, 20s.

(Fol. 65.) — Nic de Wermundsworth, 4 bov. for i m.

Will fil Hugh, 3 bov. and 4 ac, los.

Will fil Fulcher, 4 a. and i toft, and l croft, 1 2d.

Will de la Haye, 2 bov., 4 ac, J m.

Will de Grey, i toft, qd. Rich fitz John held 6d.

Peter Senior (Sandiacre ?) held 4 bov. in Kirkhalum of the
same seijeanty, 20s.

Robt, parson of Radclive, i bov., 4s.

John de Leka, i^ virg., i m.

Hrs. Robert Ingram held 2 bov., 4 a. meadow, i rod, worth
22s. 9d., fined one marc.

Hrs. William de Dunston, 6 bov. of land for i6s.

Rob. de Vavasor, i toft, 6d.

428 THE TESTA DE NEVII.

SERJ. DE RATCLIVE.

(Fo. 66.) — Jul. fil Roger de Hamstead, i virg., | m.

EHas Pycot, 4 virg., 20s.

Leticia Pycot, I virg., 53.

Step. Cocus, I virg., i m.

John le Hostric, 2 virg., los. Thos. Pycot and his heirs for
nnaking moots (faciend mutas, that is, doing suit of court)

Ernald fil Elye, i virg., 6s.

The heir of Thorn, le Tailour, i virg., 4s.

Math, de Sandiacre, 4s. et 3s, for the said Thos. (de Sandi-
acre) for the reason aforesaid.

Wills Pymmie, i virg., 4s., except by the service of Thorn.
Picot, as long as he did service to the king.

Thorn, le Paum', i virg., 4s., except Thos. Pycot's service,

Hugh Mussun, i virg., J m., which was sold by the father
of Richard le Hostric (the falconer).

John de Lek, 3 virg., i marc, except service of Thomas.

Rich. Seman, ij, J of i virgate, 4s., and Thomas 7s. per
annum for the above cause.

(Fol. 6y.) — Felicia fil Wm. Pingnant, 2 virg., los.

Anketil fil Thomas, 2 virg., J m., and Thos. Picot*s services.

Prior de Bredon, 2 virg., los.

Robert de Hausted i bovate, 4s. (2 — 36 Henry HI.).

Of the serjeanty of Roge de Colwic in Colwich and Wyleby
nothing is sold, and it is known that for his serjeanty in Colwic,
upon the arrival of the king in Nottingham once in each year,
he should render 12 arrows, and for the serjeanty of Wyleby he
should find for the king's army in Wales one horse worth 13s. 4d.
and one sack and one pitcher (sacca cum brokea), and one
capustrum de canebo (leash for hounds), worth one farthing
(I ob.)

Alanus le Lorimer i bovate in Mansfield Woodhouse, by the
service of capturing wolves, and nothing is sold of that land.

SERJEANTY DE HUCKNAL. (FoL. 67.)

Wm. le Bretun de Hucknal holds 2 bov. land in serjeanty
of Hugo fil Coste in Huck»al, Radford, and Kirkby, he himself

THE FEODARY OF 2/ HENRY HI. 429

and his heirs hold the whole of the said lands of the king for 5s.
per annum at the Exchequer, at two terms if he wished to hold
it, but if not it was to remain in the king's hands, and it was
known that nothing was rented by the said Hugh or by his
heirs.

68. — Rico Freeman and his heirs for one bov. of land of the
same serjeanty, 2s. 6d.

De Eliyas de Bretun 8a. land, i8d.

Rich de Aswardeby 2a. land, 4d.

Nic Norman 8a. land, i messuage and I toft, 3s. 4d.
. Walter de Stanley la and ir. of land, 3d.

Prior of Felley 3a. of land and i toft, i6d.

Galf de Langton la. land and 2 tofts, 2s. 8d.

Step, le Marescal 2a. of land and i toft, 2s.

The House of St. John, Nottingham, 2ja. land, 6d.

John de Perpunt 3 rods land, 3d.

Hugh fil Coste holds the remainder of the said serjeanty by
carrying the king's girfalcons at the cost of the king. The value
was formerly ;^ 10 altogether, but when he did service he ought
to have ninepence per day.

SERJEANTY DE SUTTON.

Alice, daughter of Robt. Passies, holds the serjeanty of Robt.
Passies in Sutton. 4 bovates of land held by her, and by her
heirs for one marc of the king per annun) if she wished to hold
it, but if not to remain in the hands of the king, and nothing is
rentecl of the rest by the said Robert or by his heirs.

Alan the Porter de Lenton 4a., 2s.

Alan Passeys fil Robt. Passeys, i b., 4s.

Prior of Lenton, i6a., 3s.

Wm. le Passeis came after and warranted that land to the
Prior. Therefore was there writ to the sheriff that he should
have, of the said Prior, of the rents of the said William 3s.
per annum, and if such rent was not had he should have the
land at the value of 3s. rent

Wm. le Passeis held the rest of the said serjeanty by finding
a man and a horse at his own proper cost for the king's army
in Wales, and it is worth annually c. shillings.

430 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

SERJEANTY OF BRUNESLEY.

The Monks of Semplingham held loj bovates and two
parts of one mill in Trowell of the serjeanty of Brunesley,
and they fined for 60s., and they did nQthing unless for the king,
and that fine was made in this form that if they were able to
recover against their warrantors, if they wished to hold the
land and the mill at 70s. per annum, but if they were not able
to recover then the rent should be 60s. if they wished, but
if not, it should remain in the hands of the king. After came
the Prior, and for 6 bovates of land which he bought of Marsill
de Trowell for 20s. remainder was left in the hands of the
king.

Rob de Muschaunt 5 bov., 15s. on the same terms.

Henr de Estheut one-third i mill ^ m.

(Fo. 70.) — Robt. de Bronesly 4 bov. and 9a. of assarts in
Trowell and Bronesly, 15s.

Thom Tobbe 12a. of new assarts, 4s.

Alexander de Wandel* for one meadow in Brunsele and a
wood called le Bocwod with common of pasture, and mast
(pessona) in the wood of Brunesley, 6s., and besides the said
Alexander and his co-heirs who hold that serjeanty, do other
services.

Gilb. de Brunesley (living 21 Henry III. and dead 7 Edward
I.), held the rest of the serjeanty by the service of finding one
man at his own cost for 40 days in the army of Wales with a
horse worth 5s. 4d. It is worth ^10 by the year.

SERJ. GILBERT LE GLUTON IN NOTTINGHAM.

Willo de Watton held i toft in Nottingham.

We now come to the last portion of this compilation in point
of date, but the first recorded. It occupies the first fifty-five
pages of this great work. Unfortunately, however, it is copied
four times over, with only some trifling alterations, which are
chiefly of value as they materially aid in correcting the mistakes
of the other copies of the transcription. No doubt we have
here the four transcriptions made under the directions of Arch-

THE FEODARY OF 2/ HENRY HI. 43 1

bishop Hubert Walter. (See page 369.) It is a very remarkable
feature in this work — which, judging from the handwriting, must
have been compiled about the reign of Edward II. — that so
little was known of the true account of the fees recorded only
in the life of the grandfather of that king, that the scribe should
transcribe these four similar documents at length. Possibly it
was because he found certain discrepancies, and thought it best
to give the whole of the documents, perhaps in actual ignorance
as to which was the true one.

The writ for the scutage of 27 Henry III. is printed at
page 378.

(Fo. I.)— THE NAMES OF THE VILLS AND OF
THOSE WHO SAY THAT THEY HOLD OTHER-
WISE THAN BY KNIGHTS' SERVICE IN THE
COUNTY OF NOTTINGHAM.

(The date of this Inquisition is probably 27 or 28 Henry III. ;
it is after 22 Henry III., because Henry de Hastings only had
a grant of his estates that year ; and it is before 33 Henry III.,
because Robert de Hareston died that year. Before 30 Henry
III., because William Grendon then died. The figures in the
margin give the references to the several copies in the original
MSS. They are placed in this order to give the whole subject
matter without unnecessary repetitions, and to save, if possible,
the learned reader from the labour of making an abstract for
himself)

The Prior of Bligh holds the whole vill of Bligh in demesne
in pure alms of the Honour of Tickhill, except 40s., which the
Abbot of Rupe holds in the same vill, in exchange for the mill
of Serleby. In the same way the Prior holds Bucketon of the
fee of John Burdon of new feoffment ; and Eleton, of the same
Honour, of the fee of Roger de Bully, and five (parvas*) bovates
of land in Bevcote, of the fee of William de Bevercote, also in
pure alms.

The Prior de Mareseie holds in Mareseie tw6 bovates of land
in pure alms of the fee of Thomas, heir of Roger de Mareseie.

432 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Will de Kelesholt, Abbot of Welbeck, Thomas de Hodishac,
and Elyas de Empvill hold in Hodishack, with its soc, twelve
bovates of land for 14s. a year.

The Prior of Worksop holds one bovate in Karlton, in Lindric,
in pure alms of the fee of Robert Furnell.

Osbert Selveyn holds half an acre in Woodhouse, of the fee
of Blatilde de Luvitot, and pays 20s. per annum for the farm
thereof

Ralf fil Nicolas holds in Dunham Draiton half of Ragenhill,
of the gift of Henry the King, and gives no scutage.

The Prior of Newstead holds two parts of the vill of Walker-
ingham, and six bovates in Misterton, in pure alms of the
gift of Henry, grandfather of King Henry, and of the gift of
King John. It was of the demesne of the king's soke of
Oswardebeck. The Prior also holds the whole vill of Papelwic
in pure alms of the gift of Henry, grandfather of King Henry.

(2.) Roger de Lanum holds twenty bovates of land in Tylne,
with the mill, of the gift of Thorn de Lanum, at 40s. annual
rent ; and Thomas was enfeoffed by King John for one hawk (?)
(spervio), and it was of the soke of Oswardebec.

Bertha de Hardreshil holds the whole vill of Claworth
(except six bovates), which she held in dower.

Henry le Noreys held fifteen bovates of land in Greneley, six
bovates in Stretton, and one bovate in Leyrton, of the fee of
Thos de Stretton, by the service of two spurs of gold ; and he,
Thomas, renders only so much, and his land is of the soke of
Oswaldebec.

Mauvesinus de Hersey (constable of Tichill 5-17 Henry HI.,)
holds the whole vill of Osberton, of the Countess of Ewe, for
whom he is dispenser ; and the heirs of Alfreton have the land,
which they defend by such service.

Adam de Hayton and Will fil Hubert hold six parts of one
carucate of land in Lund, Clumber, Retford, and Misterton, of
the Honour of Tickhill, for one horse and one sack to the
Constable of Tickhill when he goes into Wales, and they give
no scutage.

Henry de Fauconberg (living 38.Henry HL), held two carucates
in Cuckney of the king in chief by serjeanty, by which he
ought to find shoes for the horses (ferra palfr') for the king
whilst he lay (p'hendinat) at Mansfield, of which Hugo de

THE FEODARY OF 27 HENRY III. 433

Holbec, Rad de la Runce, Wills de Holbeck, and Agnes fil Tom
hold of him six bovates of land in the same vill, and pay for the
farm annually 12s. ; and the Abbot of Welbec holds of him four
bovates of land in pure alms.

Galfry Tregos holds the whole vill of Bildersthorp in demesne
of the soke of Mansfield, of the gift of Robert de Greul, with
his daughter in free marriage, and he does no service to him for
it there or elsewhere.

3. — Henry de Hastings (grant 22 Henry HI.) holds the whole
vill of Oswardebec, with its sokes of Oswaldebec, Leyrton,
Stretton, Lutilburg, Weteleg, Sudbec, Wiston, and Wellum, in
exchange with the king for the land which he had in the County
of Chester, and receives it for (capit) ^^^S 19s.

John Burdon holds three bovates of land in demesne in
Buckton, of the Honour of Tickhill, by the service of one horse
and one sack when the constable goes into Wales on the king's
service.

The Prior of Shelford holds two bov. of land in Karleton,
in pure alms of the fee of J. Bardolf.

The Chapter of Suwell holds 11 bov. in Newton, in pure alms
of the fee of Robert de Everingham.

Rad de Crumwell holds the whole vill of Lameley, of the
Honour of Tickill, and pays ;£40 per annum.

Roger de Colwick holds the whole vill of Colwick, in cap.
of the Honour of Pevl, by the service of 12 arrows per ann.
(He died 36 Hy. HI.)

The Chapter of Southwell and Prioress of Brewood holds
3 parts of the vill of Kalv'ton, in pure alms of the same
Honour.

The Prior de Landa holds the vill of Saltirford in pure alms.

The Prior of T'garton holds the vill of Turgarton and Fisker-
ton, in pure alms of the feoffment of Oliver de Eyncourt

Ludham cu soc is in the king's hands, i>., Gunthorp, Kat-
thorp, and Ulvesthorp, and 6 bov. of land in Barton.

The Hospital of Jerusalem holds the whole vill of Oscinton, in
pure alms of the Honour of Byron.

The Prior of the Temple holds I bov. in North Karlton, in
free alms of the fee of Robt. de Ev'ingham of the old feoffment.

(4) The Chapter of Suthwell and Prior of Lenton hold the
whole vill of Crophill, in pure alms of the fee of John de Vilers,

434 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

except 14 bov. which Wm. Gernet holds of the same John for
6d. per ann.

Robert de Harestun (he died 33 Hy. III.) held 2 parts of the
vill of Hickling by free farm (libam firmam) for 10 m. per ann.,
of the fees of the Earl of Lincoln.

Hugh de Tycheby held J of Tydheby of 'the fee of Isolde de
Grey, and paid per annum J a mark for all services.

Henry de Hastings holds the whole vill of Mansfield (with its
socs), ue.y Wudhus, Sutton, and Nettleword, and receives (capit)
per ann. for the farm, £^2 3s- lod.

The King Henry holds half of Lindeby, and farms it for

£7 14s.

Robert de Marys holds the other half by the wardship of

Laurence, heir of Laurence de St Michael (escheat dated 30

Hy. III.)i and pays i skin (pell) of 7 fesses (qy. folds.)

The king holds the whole vill of Bulewell and 10 a. in
Heindeshill, for which he receives jQj annually.

Herb de Nevil holds the whole vill of Arnal and \ of Wud-
burg, for which he renders ;f 10 per annum. (King John gave
it to him in the fifth year of his reign.)

The Prior de Lenton, the whole vills of Lenton, Radford,
Kyketon, Newtorp, with its appurtenances, in pure alms belong-
ing to the Abbey.

Gilbert de Brunesley (his date is 12 Hy. III. — 7 Ed. I.) holds
\ car. in Brunesley, \ car. in Broculston, by the service of finding
one cart-horse (affrus) and one sack for the kings army in
Wales, by serjeanty.

Robert Passeis holds Sutton by the same service.

Thos. Pycot's (he was living 41 Hy. IH.) holds the whole vills
of Radcliff and Kynstan, in chief by serjeanty of goshawking
(ostriciam), of antient fee.

Abb Cestre, the whole vill of Weston, Aston, Wilne, Scard-
low, Mori*, Smalley, and Kydesl*, in pure alms, by the feoff-
ment of the Earl of Chester. (This is surely a mistake, as they
were part of the Honour of Peverel.)

(5.) Rich de Sandiacre used to hold the whole vill of Maperley
by the service of finding a kennel for the hounds ; and Robt.
ie Vavasor and many others are enfeoflFed of this, but not
by knight service.

Abb of Burton holds the whole vill of Magna Ove', the whole

THE FEODAI^Y OF 27 HENRY HI. 435

vills of Parva Ove', Findern, Potlack, and Willinton, in pure
alms of the gift of Henry, grandfather of Henry, son of King
John.

Clemencia, Countess of Chester, holds the whole vills of
Mcnton, Rependen, Englebi, Kalne, Stanton, Tichenkale, Wale-
ton, Roustloveston, Meysham, Childecote, Newton, Brettebi,
Sundebi, WivelesF, Packington, Durandstorp, of the Hon. of
Chester in Dower.

Gilbert de Seagrave holds the vill of Cotene of the Honour
of Lancaster, of the wife of Gilbert de Seagrave, for one grey-
hound (bracketu) and one leash (ligamie) per ann.

Abbot de Burton, the whole vills of Stapenhull, Bergecote,
J Stanton, Caudwell, and Wyveshal, J Appilby in chief of
the king in pure alms.

(6.) These are the liberties in which the sheriff of Nottingham
and Derby could not have ingress for making inquisition of a
scutage, but which under the last command did not render to
the sheriff any Roll of that inquisition.

Wap de Newark, which the Bishop of Lincoln holds in his
hands, andfwould not permit the sheriff to make inquisition,
nor that the men of that wapentake should come before the
sheriffs ; indeed (immo) the Bishop s bailiffs said that it was
commanded, but as yet they did not by themselves hold any
inquisition of which the sheriff had any cognizance, nor return
any Roll to him.

Wap de High Peak which Warner Engain (1253), had in
custody ; neither made any inquisition, nor returned any Roll
to the sheriff.

Wap of Apeltree and Wap of Wirksworth, which W. de
Ferrers, Earl of Derby, had in hand at farm from the Lord
King ; neither made any inquisition, nor returned any Roll to
the sheriff. (This part is not given in No. 2 and 3.)

KNIGHTS' FEES WHICH ARE HELD IN NOT. AND
DERB. WHICH HAVE WRITS FOR HAVING
SCUTAGE. FoLS. 6, 25, and 42.)

HON. OF TICKILL.

Alice, Countess of Auge, holds in Nottm. 39 kts. fees, and
i of one fee, and ^^5, of which Roger de Osberton holds the

436 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

whole vill of Stretton for i fee of the Countess, and the Countess
of the king in chief by ancient feoffment. (This matter is
repeated at page 25, and again at p. 42).

WiUiam Ruffus and Mauvisnus de Hercy hold Grave for
ij k. fee of ancient feoffment {Temp, John, they were the
co-heirs of Ashe.)

Simon de Hedon (he was living 54 Hy. III.) holds Hedon

«

I J of I knight's fee of ancient feoffment.

Robt. de W'lrington and John de Eton (John de Eton not
in 2nd) held Eton by 2 fees of i fee of ancient feoffment

(7.) Will de Peverelcotes (p. 25, 42 Bevercotes, Nos. 2 and 3),
holds the vill of Peverelcote for i fee of ancient feoffment.

Thom ill Willi and Albreda de Bassingbum hold the whole
vill of Hareworth in the same way for i fee.

Ingeram fil Galf, Thom de Stretton, and Isabella, his wife (a
quo heditas movet) from whom the inheritance proceeds, and
Nom (25) (Norman in Nos. 2 and 3) fil Alfred holds of them in
Stirop of the same tenure, i.

Wm. fil and heir Roger de Cressi (living 6 Ed. I., paid relief
for his mother's lands), who is in custody of the said countess
holds Hoddesac for one fee of same tenure.

(42.) John (Robert in No. 3) de Orreby and,Thurston Dispens
hold of her (in Byleby No. 2) \ and -^ parts of one fee of
ancient feoffment.

Robert de Fornellis (Furnell in No. 2) and Thom..de Lincoln
hold of her in Carlton i fee of same tenure.

Stephen Mauluwell holds in Rampton of her i fee of the
same.

(26.) Matilde de Luvetot (living 33 Henry III.) holds
Wirksop of her of same tenure, and in Gringelegg, Misterton,
Walkeringh', Herewell, Tyriswell i of i fee of her and she of
the king.

Will de Sandeby (living 20 Henry III.) holds of her in Sandeby,
Burton, March', Hapworth (Barwood in No. 3), Misterton,
Worsop, Welln i fee, and she of the king.

(43.) Alicia de Evermu (filia Matilde de Luvetot in No. 2, de
Everniu in No. 3) holds in Thorpe (of Matilde de Luvetot and
Matilde of the Countess No. 2) i fee of ancient feoffment

Hugo de Capella and the son of Robt de Sumville hold of
her in Eyton (Oxton No". 3) i fee, etc.

THE FEODARY OF 2^ HENRY III. 437

Wm. de Furnell holds of her (of Matilde de Luvetot in No. 2)
Normanton and Gresthorpe \ of one, etc

Fulc de Hotot holds of her (of Matilde de Luvetot in No. 2)
in Flintham \ of one, etc.

Prior of Shelford holds of her (Matilde de Luvetot in No. 2)
in Saxendale i fee, etc.

Thomas de Chauces (he was a minor in 26 Henry III.) holds
of the countess in Marcham (Marnham No. 2) 2 fees, etc.
(There is a note in the margin in a later handwriting, error, so
before in Md., in the i8th year of Edward II., Michas. term).

Wm. Rufus and Malvesinus de Hersy holds of her in Weston
\ a fee, etc.

Robt. de Eyvil and John de Nunvilers holds of her in Skeggebi
(of Thom fil Wm. and Thos. of the countess in No. 2) one fee,
etc. (No. 2 adds of new feoffment, because they married the
two sisters of the said Thos.)

Rich de Normanville and Hy. de Walkey (Walleg No. 3)
hold of her in Karl, Gedling, Stoke, and Weston one fee, etc.,
of ancient feoffment.

(27.) Thurston Dispens and John de Orreby (the last omitted
in No. 2) hold of her in Ep'ston one fee, etc

Waltr. de Thurck (Tolk) holds of her in Kelm \ a fee, etc.

Agatha de Thuch (Tolk) holds of her there by reason of
the custody of (John No. 2) the heir of Peter de Kelum i a fee,
etc. (No. 2 adds of the fee of Roger de Cressi).

Hugo Pincerna holds of her in Hocreton, i fee, etc.

Thom fil Will holds of her in Plumtr', Normanton, Stanton,
Kewarth, Rotington, and Rempeston for half of i fee, etc.

(27.) Nigel de Mundevil, Wm. de Staunford, and Roger de
Luvetot I fee in Wyshon, etc. (not in No. i.)

(44.) Will de Boveys i fee in Cortingstock and Rempstone,
etc (not in No. i.)

(9.) Peter de Stanford holds of her in Staunford sup sore one
fee, etc

Simon de Hedon (17 Gervase de Uvetorp, No. 2) holds of her
in Westhorpe 3 pt. of i fee, etc

Robt. and Wm. Barry hold of her in Torloveton (Thortloneto
No. 3) one fee, etc.

Wm. Malbisse and the Abbot of Welbec held of her in
Knyveton 3 pts. of a fee, etc

438 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Galf de la Fremud and his parceners held of her Flintham for
J a fee, etc

Wm. fil Will de Coliston held of her in Coliston ^ a fee, etc

(28.) Hugh fil Ralf and Wm. de Batheleg held of her in
Coliston (Nos. 2 and 3 omitted and inserted Batheleg) and in
South Muscam a third part of a fee, etc.

Wm. fil RobL de Riselig held of her in Riselig ^^y of a fee,

etc

(The ID following entries are omitted in No. 2, but given in

No. 3.)

Rico Poutrel held of her in Thurmeston one fee, etc.

Phia de Tilly (Tylby in No. 3) held of her in Upton and
Marcham one fee, etc.

Robt de Luvitot held of her in Kirkolmston one fee, etc

Thom fil Willi held of her in Clareburg and West Draicot
3 pts. of I, etc, and in Breydeston | a fee, etc.

(45.) Robt de Lathum held of her in Alfreton and Nor-
manton (Northon No. 3) 2 pts. of one fee, etc

(10.) Rad de Reresby held of her in Plesley, Kirkeby (Cher-
broc in Na 3), and Oxton one fee, etc.

The Prior of Newstead held of her Ruethorne for one fee, etc

Hubert de Burg held of her Weteley (Weteley No. 3,)
Misterton, etc, J of a fee., etc

Ric de Marcham, Henr de Walley, and Rich de Normanville
held of her in Getling 2 pts. of i fee. All the above are of old
feoffment, etc

DEINCOURT BARONY.

(28.) OLIVER DE AINCOURT holds 17 knights' fees, i,
I of one fee of which Wm. de Aslacton and the Abbot of
Welbec hold in Aslacton i and ^ fees of Oliver, and he of the
king* of ancient feoffment

The same Oliver holds in Sutton Graneby one fee, etc, of
old feoffment

Gerard de Fancourt holds of him in Hickling and Kyingon
(Kinigton, No. 2) one fee, and Oliver holds of the king in
chief.

Robert de Eyncourt holds of him in Ratcliff one fee, etc

Gilbs. de Kirkholmston half fee in Kirkhomston, etc

THE FEODARY OF 2J HENRY III. 439

Roger de Aincourt J of a fee on Knapetorp, etc.

Walter de Goushill one fee in Flintham, etc.

Rich de Jorz one fee in Birton, etc.

(29.) No 2 adds, " Of the heirs of Adam de Sl Maria and
he of Oliver of old feoff/'

(43.) Regin de Anesley, Sibel de St Maria and Adam de
Ridwale hold one fee in Bulcote of him, etc

(11,46.) Walter de Goushill and Robt de Eyncourt hold
two fees of him (No. 2 adds in Hoveringham), etc

Benedict fil Thom holds of him Rouliston and Kelum for
\\ fees, etc

Thom de Bella aqua and Roger de Cruche (Crich No. 2) hold
of him in Hockerton \ fee, etc

Oliver de Aincourt holds of him in Clypeston (No. 2 has
Elmton instead, No. 3 Clifton), and Holingfield, two fees of
Oliver, etc

Rad Basset holds in Languard (No. 2 has Langvat, No. 3
Langwath), one fee of him (of Oliver No. 2), etc

Roger de Eyncourt holds in Morton one fee of him, &c

Wm. de Heriz holds in Williamsthorpe, \ a fee, -etc (No.
2 of Galf Dispens de Stavely, and the heirs of Robt.
Musard).

Keriel holds of him in Horsepol and Sutton, \ a fee, &c

46, Wm. Keriel.

Wm. de Wyverton holds in Wiverton one fee of him, &c

(29.) No. 2 gives of the fee of Andrew Lutrell.

All are of ancient feoffment

Nothing is found to be held in capite, unless of the fee of
Gerard de Rhodes.

(12.) HON. OF LANC, 8i fees in Nottingham, of which
(No. 2) Wm. de Grendon held in Babworth (47 Babword,
No. 3), of ancient feoffment, half a fee.

(30.) Thom de Maresy, who is in the custody of the Arch-
bishop, held I fee in Gamelston (omitted in No. i).

Robert de Furneyes, Robt de St George, hold in Bothe-
illishil (BodmershuU, No. 2 ; Godnastatch, No. 3), one fee of the
same honour of ancient feoffment.

Abb of Swineshed holds Cotgrave for one knight's fee of
same honour.

Michael de Mannevers (Manners No. 3), holds in Holm,

440 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Gamelston, Atbolton, Lambecote, Bukton, for one fee of the
same honour.

Nigel de Wycheford holds in Flintham one fee (of the heirs of
Robt. Merecalf (No. 2 adds, who is in the custody of the Arch.),
of the same honour.

John de Vilers holds in Galveston J of a fee.

Wm. le Butler (in Newbold and Oakthorpe (in Derb), Calver-
ton, Crophill), one fee. etc. (omitted in No. i).

Robert de Harston, in Sutton-in-Dal (in Dale, No. 3), -^ part
of a fee of same honour.

(30.) The EARL OF LINCOLN held 2J fees in the
County of Nottingham, of ancient feoffment, of which John de
Gatton held in Clipeston (Clifton No. 3), one fee (No. 2 of
Thom).

• Hugo de Weston held in Weston half a fee of the same
honour.

(13.) Derb. Thom fil Willi held in Breydeston half of a fee
of that same honour.

(48.) (No. 2 of the earl, and the earl of the Countess of Ewe,
and she of the king.)

John Burdon held in Buckton J fee of old feoffment of same
honour.

(30.) (No. 2) Rad Knesale, whom Marescal holds.

(31.) ROBERT DE EVRINGHAM held in Nottingham Sj
fees, of which Regin Ursel, and Hugo Tytheby (Tydeby No 3),
held in Gedling, Carlton, and Stoke, half a fee of the same
honour.

Robt. de Everingham held in Leynton (No. 3 Leyeston)
in demesne, ij knight's fees, and in Schelford in demesne, one
and a half knight's fees.

Thos. de Muscampe, in North Muscamp and Gal va ton,
one fee of the same honour.

Abbot of Dale, in Hocbroc (No. 3 Okebrook, Derbyshire),
held one fee of the same honour. (Omitted in No. 2).

WILLIAM BARDOLF held in Nottingham and Derby 7J
fees, of which Hugo de la Basache (Basage No. 3), held in
Galverton, Gedling, and Stoke, of the old feoffment.

(31.) Wm. Bardolf, in Schelford, li fee in demesne, and in
Egginton (Holton No 3), Alwaldestun, Okebroke, Am-
boldeston, and Bolton (all in Derbyshire), 5i fees of old
feoffment.

. THE FEODARY OF 27 HENRY HI. 441

(49.) The Earl of Leicester held ^ fee in Nottingham, which
Robt. de Lathom held of him in Edwolton (No. 2 and 3 add,
•* and all other lands which he has he holds of him by free farm
libam fermam.'O (No. 3, from this point, goes on to the
Honour of Peveril at page 49, and after transcribing it, returns
to this place. Omitted in No. 2).

(14, and 32.) GILB DE GANT held in Nottingham 8i
fees, of which
(32, 52.) Wm. de Sutton held in Eicring ^ of one fee.
Adam de Novomercato (Newmarch No. 2), held of him in
Whatton and Aslacton, 2 fees.

Ralf fil Peter, and 3 parceners, held of him in Hokesworth (of
Jollan de Nevil, etc), one fee.

'32. Hugo fil Ralf, in Ilkeston, 2 parts of i fee.
Robt. de Vavasor and Nic fil John (de Henour, in
Nos. 2 and 3), held of him in Shipley 2 parts of

I fee.
(No. 2 adds of Hugo fil Ralf, and he of Gilbert de
Gand, and he of the king.)
Derby { Rad Herford, and Robt de Muscamp, in Stanton,
i a fee.
(No. 2 adds of Hugo fil Ralf, etc)
Hy. de Buckton held Breydestone for ^ knight's fee.
(No. 2 adds of Hugo fil Ralf, etc)
WntL de Sutton, in Sutton, ith of a fee (omitted* in
, No. 2.)

(32.) The EARL OF LINCOLN holds of him in Knesall,
etc, 3 fees of old feoffment

(No. 2 adds, the Archbishop of York, Hugh fil Ralf, holds
Muscamp, Carlton, of him, i fee of ancient demesne. Robt
de Everingham, of North Carlton, t do.)

(S3.) COM DE ARUNDEL holds in the Countyof Not-
tingham 2 J and ^ part of one fee, of which

(33.) (No. 2 adds Maud de Solney, in Burton Solney, i fee of
ancient feoffment)

Johes Bossard held in Thorpe Bossart (No. 2 adds, and in
Wiliby) i, and ^V of the old feoffment

Robt de Schepping, in Smythby (Sundeby, No. 3), J fee of the
same.

(32.) Gilbert de Seegrave, 3 parts of i in Bretby, No. 2.
30

442 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Egid de Berkeley, in Childcot, h fee of same.

WM. DE ALBINI holds in Nottingham 2 fees of the king,
in Oscinton, with its soke, (omitted in No. 2.)

(William was enfeoffed, and enfeoffed Roger Bozun. Wm.
de Audeley i ; Nicolus Moels, of the heirs of John Heriz.)

(15.) EPIS LINC holds in Nottingham 3, i, J; ts o( one fee
of which . Nigel de Lysurs holds of him in Normanton,
Fletburg, Stokum, and Dernethorpe. (No. 2 has Sternthorpe),
3 knight's fees (No. 2 has 2 fees) of ancient feoffment.

Rad de Crumwell, holds of him in Crumwell, half a fee of the
same ; and in Westhalum ith (No. 2 has i) of same feoffment

Derb. — Wills de Bellaaqua (Wills de Bellehav, No. 2), holds
of him in Aldisworth yV^h of a fee.

(34.) PATRIC DE CHAURCES holds in the County of
Nottingham 2 fees, which Philip de Cortingstock holds of him in
Rempeston (of ancient feoffment, No. 2.)

(No. 2 adds Wm. de Audelleg a fourth part of one fee.)

NICH DE MOELS holds in the County of Nottingham, in
Widmerpol, Gunalveston, Winfield, and Tybshelf, 3J fees by
custody of the heir of John de Heriz, and the heirs hold of the
king in chief (No. 3 adds, ** for two fees and three-parts of one,
and ^ part of one "). (No. 2 adds, " of the gift of King Henry
fil John.")

No. 2.— OF THE BISHOP OF CHESTER.

Sallowe, with its soke, is in the hands of the king, and out of
it is held two fees, and a third part of one fee, and -^ part of
one, of which Patric de Chaucis (Nos. 2 and 3 Sacheverel) holds
one fee (No. 2, " \ ") in Hopwell (of Nigel de Langford, and he
of the bishop, No. 2).

Hugo fil Ralf holds in Wivelsthorpe i of i.

(35.) Rich de Kinston -j^y of i in Draycot

Robert Ingram in Eyton renders 2s. scutage ; or scutage, be
it more or less.

Hugo de Tom (Tev'y, No. 2 and 3) holds there ^V of i.

William fil Roger and Elias hold ^ of the same.

(No. 2. Nigel de Langford in Hopwell one fee of ancient
feoffment.)

(16.) In Staveley, Barley, Hekering (No. 2, Hinkershill), Galf
Dispens holds i fee by reason of the custody and wardship of

THE FEODARY OF 27 HENRY III. 443

the land and heir of Robert Musard, and the heirs should hold
the same of the king in chief (No. 2 and 3, the same have
Tissington in Wirksworth).

Albreda de Bassingburn holds Bridgeford and Harewood for
2 fees by reason of the custody of the heir of John BiseL

(36.) The Bishop of Carlisle holds in Peverelsthorpe J a fee
by custody of the heir of John Vipont (No. 2. Robert fil John).

The Bishop of Carlisle holds in Chelardeston J of a fee by
the custody of the heir of Philip Marc. (No. 2 adds, that
Ralf de St. Edmund brought a writ for scutage, and could
not have it except for three carucates in Catton, which he
held of the Earl Ferrars for half a fee, as it was found in an
Inquisition of the Wapentake of Gresley ; also the fees of
Thomas de Grenelegh. Nothing was found, and yet he brought
a writ of the king for having his scutage.)

Johanna, the widow of Hugh Wake, has the custody of the
land and heir of the said Hugh (No. 2 gives the custody as of
Hugh), that is to say, Chesterfield with its appurts and Wapen-
take, out of which William de Percy holds £16 of land by the
name of one of the heirs of William de Bruera (55), and of
which the said Johanna, with the other heirs of the said William
Bruera, as well the Manor of Chesterfield as other lands in
various counties held by the service of three knights' fees, as in
Chesterfield, Sneynton, Avesmust, Kingswere (No. 2, Axmins-
ter, Kyndelsmere), in Somerset, and this is by the feoffment
of King John.

Gerard de Odingselles holds in Eperston and Undel one fee,
which William Sampson holds of him.

HONOUR OF RICHMOND.

2 fees in the County of Nottingham, of which

(55.) John de Nevil held in Rolleston one fee of the old
feoffment •

Richard de Sutton, in Sutton, Carlton, and Merings, i fee.

(17.) Baldwin de Panton held in North Muscam i fee of
the fee of the Abbot of Burgo.

No. 2 adds, John Torcard holds 3 parts of the vill of
Hucknal for ij (of the Honour of Wake, No. 2).

No. r and 2 stop here ; No. 3 proceeds as follows : —

(S5-) William Sampson holds Eperston and Wudburgh, of the

444 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

Barony of Odinghes (Odingselles), for i fee of the old feoffment
Summons for summoning W. Com. Derby and Clemencia,
Comtessa Cestriae, Thos Busson (Curzon) de Kelleston, Peter
fil William de Thorleston, Wm. fil Henry de Breydeston, Nic
fil Thom de Heanor, who were before the Barons of the
Exchequer in order to show why they did not certify to the
sheriff of what fees they were enfeoffed by the king, nor what
fees were held by themselves, whether of new or old feoffment.
And the Earl of Chester was summoned for the same ; also
Robert, Bishop of Lincoln, John Pride de Kelum, Ralf fil
Helewis, of the same summons ; also to all the liberties and
wapentakes of Bers, Oswardebec, Simon de Jorz of Ordishall,
Will le Faylier de Leyton.

(17 & 37.) KNIGHTS' FEES WHICH WERE HELD IN
THE COUNTIES OF NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY
WHICH HAVE NOT WRITS FOR HAVING
SCUTAGE. (THIS IS NOT CONTAINED IN NO.
3.) (FEES OF THE OLD FEOFFMENT.)

(Derb.) THE EARL OF DERBY held 28, i, |, and i, of
which Rich de Vernon held in Haddon and Basselow one
fee. Will de Montgomery held in Merston and Cubbele for
10 m. 4s. and 46, for 3, y, and yV fees of the Earl of Ferrars,
and the Earl of the King.

Sewell fil Henry held i fee in Hoka of the same.

Rad de Pichford, in Sutton, for J fee do.

(108.) Serlo de Munchoye, in Shilderly, for i fee do.

Walter de Rieboff, in Etwall, for J do.

(Derb.) Henry de Brailsford, in Brailsford, held for J do.
Rich de Herthill, in Middleton, held for i fee do.

John de Chandos, in Mugginton, held for i fee dot

Robt. de Slielford, in Mercaston, held for J fee do.

(18.) Thomas de Curzon, in Ketleston, held 4 pts. of I fee do.

Galfe de Bakepuz, in Alkmanton, 3 pts. of i fee do.

Henry de Herteshorn, in Herteshorn, held for i kts. fee.

(38.) Nicolas Mevel (Meveril) and his parceners, in Leke, i of I.

Robert de Tuke and Galf de Bek held in Hilton i of i (No. 2).

Robert de Dun, in Breydeston, 2 fees.

THE FEODARY OF 2J HENRY III. 44S

Wm. fitz Herbert, in Eyss, 3 pts. of i.

Walter de Stretton and Havise de Dun, in Braceleg (No. 2
has Bradeleg), J of i.

John de Bakepuz, in Barton, one fee.

Oliver de Aincourt and Matildc, his wife, in Boyleston, i of i.

Robert de Curzon, in Twyford, one fee.

Rad de Beufey, in Trusley, 2 pts. of one fee.

Hamon de Saperton, in Saperton, \ of one fee.

Adam de Edenshour, in Edenshour, one fee.

Henry de Hotot, in Jolgreve, \ a fee.

(19.) Norman de Suhiey, in Newton, i fee.

Wm. fil Galfry de Gresley, in Linton, i fee.

Walter de Stretton, in Stretton, i fee.

The Hrs. of Bertram de Verdun, in Foremark, \ fee.

Rico de Hertishorn, in Hertishorn, J fee.

Robert fil William de Stanton, in Stonstanton, \ fee.

(Nottm.) The men of Westerleke i fee in that place.

Robert de Curzon, in Kelleston, J of I fee. (No. 2 gives i.)

(Nottm.) Rad fil Nicolas, in Thurn'ton, J of one fee.

Will de Gresley and Gilbert de Seagrave, in Linton, 3 pts.
of I.

Wm. de Stafford and John de Chandos, in Rodburn, i fee.

Henry de Chaumbreys, in Brunolveston, \ fee.

(40.) Gerard de Fancurte, in Wingerworth, \ fee.

(Nottm.) Alured de Suleiny, in Brocton, i.
Sum 28 fees, |, \, and ^V

ALSO THE SAME EARL HELD TWO FEES AND
\ PT. OF ONE OF THE NEW FEOFFMENT OF
WHICH (Fo. 20.)

(20.) (Derb.) Serlo de Monjoie, in Spondon, i of I fee.
(40.) Ralf fil Nicolas -5^ of one fee in the .same.
Nic de Tutebirst (No. 2 has TutesburS) yV of one fee do.
Robert de Wyne -^ of one fee do.

Rico de Grey i fee do.

Rado de Curzon \ of one fee do.

William Oter \ of one fee do.

Henry de Kardoil \ of one fee do.

446 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

OF THE HONOUR OF CHESTER 5 FEES AND A
HALF AND ^th OF ONE OF WHICH

Robert Tuschet held in Markeaton, with its soke, i and 2 pts.
of I fee.

Roger de Montealto held four fees in Waleton and Meysham
with its appurtenances.

(41.) OF THE HONOUR OF HUGO DE WAKE IN

BRUNE.

John Torchard held 2 fees in Huchnal with its appurtenances.
Joha., widow of Hugh Wake, held half a fee in Kyleburn.

(21.) THE FEES OF RALF DE MORTIMER.

The Abbot of Dale held J of one fee in Trovvell with its
appurts.

Wm. de Riseleg J fee in B'mcote with its appurts.

Wm. de Trowell i of one fee in Stanvord and Leke with its
appurts.

(41.) OF THE HONOUR OF AUFRETON.

Robt de Cokefeld (No. 2 and 3 Hokefield) held i of one fee
in Nutall.

Roger de Watenhow half a fee in Watenhow.

Hy. de Birchwood | of i in B'mcote with its appurts.

Wm. de Wudburg } fee in Wudburg with its appurts.

Rad fil Nicholas one fee in Moinass with its appurts.

(After coming to this a second time, T de Nevil recommences
with the Countess de Auge fees as at page 5, and continues to
page 41, where No. 3 transcript begins and continues to page 57.

(6,7.) OF THE HONOUR OF PEVEREL.

(This is not repeated in No. 2, but it is given twice in No. 3.)
(49.) Robert de Strelly, in Strelly, i fee of the Honour of
Peverel.

(56,) Richard de Wiverton, in Wiverton, ith. do.

(Died ante 37 Henry III.)

THE FEODARY OF 27 HENRY III. 447

(Derb.) Ranulf le Poer, in Penkeston, i fee of the Hon. of Peverel.

Galf de Stapelford, in Stapelford, i do.
(22.) (Derb.) Cecelia de Meynil, in Kinewaldermarsh, i do.

The town in Glapwell, i in Glapwell do.

Roger de Breton, in Waleton, i do.

(Robert, his son, paid his relief 34 Henry HI.)

Isolde de Grey,'in Codenhour, 5J do.

Galf de Bakepuz, in Riseley, 3 pts. of i do.

Gerard de Rhodes, in Clifton and Langar, i do.
(28 Henry HI., paid his relief on the death of Ralf, his father.)

Hugo fil Ralf, in Greseley, i do.

(50.) John Beauchap, in Beston, i do.

Ralf de Norman ville, in Thorpe, J and rt do.

Wm. de Mortain, in Cossal and Wollaveton, i do.

(Eustace held these 7 Henry HI., 30 Henry HI.)

Peter fil Osbert, in Stanton, 4 do.

John de Orreby, in Baseford, 3 pts. of i do.

Peter de Goldington, in Colwic, J do.

(Reginald Colwic, 36 Henry HI.)

Robert le Vavasor, in Bilburg, J do.

(23.) Will fil Ralf de Sibtorp, in Sibtorp, i do.

THESE HELD OF THE KING IN CAPITE.

William de Ferrars, in Bingham, one fee.

(Had grant 19 Henry III.)
Ralf Basset, in Coleston, for one fee.
Ralf Gernon, in Bancwell, for i fee of the king in chief.
(William de Gernon paid his relief 32 Henry III.
Will de Morteyn, in Eyam, i fee do.

Robert de Hotot, in Screveton, i of i do.

Robert Daft (Dast in No. 3), in Algertorp, i do.

(7,51.) OF THE HONOUR OF BIRUN.

The men of Latchurch, 2 pts. of i fee of the said Honour.
Alan Malet, in Cotgrave, for i and 3 pts. of i fee do.

(Succeeded 14 Henry III.)

HONOUR OF WILLIAM DE PERCY.

William Rossel, in Deneby, i fee.

The men of Kirkhalum, J fee in Kirkhalum.

448 THE TESTA DE NEVIL.

(24.) OF THE HONOUR OF MUMBRAY.

Robert le Sauvage, in Egrum, 3 fees.
Hugh de Serleby, in Serleby, 3 pts. of i fee.

(10.) THE FEES OF RALF DE FRESSONVILLE,
OF THE BARONY OF HUBERT FIL RALF.

Rad de Fressonville, 5 and ^ts P^ of one fee in Boney, Barton,
Bradmer, ScarcHve, and Crich, with their appurts.

(52.) Ralf fil Ralf de Reresby, in Essover, i fee of the same
fee.

Roger de Somerville, in Blackwell, I do.

John de Orreby, do. i do.

Reginald de Annesley, in Anesley, 2 fees.

Robert Dechec (Dethec in No. 3), in Chilwell, J fee.

The Abbot of Derley, in Rippeley, 2 fees.

Simon fil Simon, in Middleton, | fee.

Mathew de Haverseth, in Haverseth, i a fee.

(No. 3 then returns to the Honour of Gilbert de Gand.)

■

OF THE HONOUR OF JOHN DE STUTEVILLE

(HALF OF THE BARONY OF HUBERT FIL

RALF).

John de Stuteville, ;£'20 for 15 knights' fees in Kirkby, with
, its appurtenances.

OF THE HONOUR OF JOHN DE STUTEVILLE, OF
HALF THE BARONY OF HUBERT FIL RALF.

John de Stuteville, 5 fees in Kirkeby, with its appurtenances.
(No. 3 has only ten fees.)

The learned reader will observe the numbers I to 24 in
the margin : they indicate the matter found in each of these
pages in the original. The numbers from 24 to 57 inclusive
indicate the pages in which this same matter is to be
found repeated. At page 25 the fees held of the Honour of
Tickhill are repeated, and again at page 42. Where any
alteration is made in the text, it is shown in brackets.

THE FEODARY OF ^^ HENRY HI. 449

In all other places the reading is the same. The reading,
where altered, is numbered 2 or 3, according to the order
of transcript, which varies it down to page 24 in the first
transcript. From that page to page 41 is No. 2, and No. 3 is
from page 41 to page 57.

No. 2 is in some respects very superior reading, and corrects
many small errors of No. i, besides supplying important
additional information. In other parts it omits considerable
portions.

4SO

COLLECTIONS FOR THE HISTORY OF

DERBYSHIRE.

Some fee B00I16 mt> feobariee

FOR THE

COUNTIES OF NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY,
FROM THE REIGN OF EDWARD I. TO HENRY VI.

CHAPTER XIV.

THE ROLL OF THE CORPUS COMITATUS FOR THE
COUNTIES OF NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY

(As it is contained in the Roll of ii Edward (IL), m. 2, dorso
No. 129, Pipe Roll Series.)

This Roll is unique, none other is known to exist, although
similar information is contained in a Roll of the time of the
Commonwealth. The Record Office Authorities call it the
Corporibur Comitatium, but, in fact, it is the ** Corpus Comi-
tatus" or accompanying volume or system relatively to the
Pipe Rolls, and the information contained in it, commonly
known as the "Corpus" of the county up to the date 12
Edward I., had regularly been incorporated in the Pipe Rolls.
This Roll, which is numbered 129 in that series, follows the
first Pipe Roll in which this information is omitted. For

SOME FEE BOOKS AND FEODARIES. 45 1

what mysterious reason the Record Office Authorities have
so classed it and dated it, it is difficult to conjecture, for
the Roll itself is clearly dated the nth Edward, and frequent
references are made to the fourth year of Edward II., showing
that it is a Roll of that king. Other references date from the
5th Edward IL, and others refer to the 22nd, 26th, and 32nd
years, . no king being mentioned. One reference is, however,
to the 29th Henry ; several references are to 4 Edward III.,
but they evidently have been added subsequently, but those
of the date of ^Edward II. were material portions of the entries
to which they belong.

The probable date is 11 Edward 1 1. This date, however, even
if accurate, must not be taken positively as the date of the
whole Roll, even for the whole for these Counties. It is only a
collection of fragments, but a small number of counties being
represented, and some of them having a larger number of
membranes than others ; the Counties of Cornwall, Norfolk, and
Suffolk are very fully represented.

The Roll is chiefly valuable for the very large number of
names it contains, but the information given is generally very
meagre and colourless.

(M. 2, d.) The Sheriff of Nottingham and Derby answers
for ;^279 5s. 6d. bl. of the farms of the same Counties, and for
£j\.o 9s. of the farm by tale. In the Treasury, nothing. The
payment of £<^2 bl. is owed for Nottingham, and ^^40 for
Derby. For Arnhale jQio 14s. bl. The heirs of Wm. Briwere
£9> bl. for Sneinton, and £ii 4s. bl. for Chesterfield. The
Canons of Sherwood 5s. for Papplewick, cs. for Oswardibec.
The Canons of Haverholm £j\. for Staunton and Calveston.
The Prior of Newstead £7 6s. for Walkringham, Asperton, and
Misterton. Thomas de Lanum 4 m. in 2 Tilnes (Thomas de
Lanum died 30 Ed. I.) Wm. de Albini £26 in Oscinton (he
died 27 Henry III.) Marie, widow of Robert fil Hugh, 36s. 4d.
in Clayworth (she obtained her dower in 22 Henry III.) Rich,
de Hardreshill 74s. 8d. (he payed £7 9s. 6d. in the 22 Hy. III.)

The heirs of Philip de Ulecote £^7$ 4s. in Oswardebec The
Abbot of Welbec 40s. for the Mill of Retford, £^0 in Duneham,
2\ m. in Carlton, as is contained in Roll 29 of the King Henry.
In Edenstowe jQ6 7s. 6d., £^6 7s. 6d. in Mansfield. Henry fil
Henry de Hastings £'ii 19s. in Oswardebec, jQi 6s. 8d. in

452 SOME FEE BOOKS AND FEODARIES.

Carlton. (The names of many places are here omitted.) Wm.
de Redmilde 40s. for unjust detention, the widow of a Jew, 6s.
fine. Ralf de Rigge, Walter de Strickesley, Robert fil Adam
le Palmer, 7s. Wm. Bardolf, per Wm. Grey (he died 18
Ed. I.)

John de Hether, former bailifT of Bancwell, for the goods of
Juliana de Walesch.

The Earl of Ferrars oweS;;f9i6 19s. id. The Earl of Ewe
;^i82. Robert de Ferrers i golden chalice (Pottum auri), and
1,500 marcs for having the good-will of the king (this is a
repetition of an entry made in the Pipe Roll of 53 Henry
III.)

Nicolas de Ille (Insula) de Kirkby, 5 m. for unjust detention.
Robt de Mapelton \ m. Wm. de la Hide, Ss. Pictaviens, a
Jew, £36, Henna widow of a Jew. John de Rye, owed half a
marc for license of concord with Robert de Champonys. Robt.
Faucon.

Robt Peyn, Wm. Cragg, Gerard le Pescur, Rad de Morwood,
Rad de Cressi, Joha. fil Henry de Toveton pledge Win. Torcar,
Robt. Clay de Dunham, Will fil Gode, Wm. Propositus, of
Derlington, Rad de Lisors, Parson of Fledborough, Herbert de
Greddelee, Ela, Widow of Wm. Lungvilers, Henry de Welhawe,
Simon de Gringeley, Ad fil Hugo le Cuper, Nich Propositus de
Hamwake, Robert fil John Rich de Heywike, Stephen le
Parmenter, Robert le Lung de Truscolt, Galf de Stanle, Roger
Wyling de Saundeby and Galfr fil Margar of the same, Rad
fil Luce and Robt de (Stokelamketel) de Edwalton, Rad fil
Amicie, Hugo Shele, Simon de Clifton, Bailiff of Wirksworth,
Clement de Lungvilers, Robert de Waddesly, Robert fil Henry
de Scarvesdale, Rich de Prees for unjust desseizin, Walter
Freeman de Musch and Will fil Odo, Richard de Geynford,
Hug de Dun, Henry de Curzon, John le Esquire de Weston,
Rad Woodhead, John de Queeneburg, Will le Estinur^ Nich
Hayhear de Beskwood, Rich de Bernak, Galf Lillock, Thos. fil
Walter, Thos. fil William, Rich Neyrint, Berta de Fumival, Nic
de Beskwod, Wm. de Kelesholt, Henry le Man de Coulard,
Thomas de Levton, Adam le Slegh, William de Montgomery,
Robert del Hill, Will Lewin de Farendon and Wm. Sigur,
Robt de Scharl, Robt. de Schurston, John le Clerk, Walter de
Hucknal, Will. Blaber, Ph. Suur, Rich, fil and heir Henry de

SOME FEE BOOKS AND FEODARIES. 453

Bentley, former Bailiff of Esseburn, John de Paustowe, Roger
fil Ralf, Robt. de Melu, Rad de Rigge, Will de Radmilde,
Rich fil Robt le Fleming.

Another membrane of the same Roll, m. 6, d., headed
"Residium of the Counties of Nottingham and Derby."

Galf de Loudham, John de Loudham de Clareborough, Elias
de la Grene, Robt le Pinder, Galf del Hill, Galf del Grove de
Clareboro', Roger Prat de Greneley, Wm. de Langwath, Wm.
de Carlton, Wm. Flintham, Rich de Seleby, Adam le Hore,
John le Bercher, Nich the Miller, Rich de Lungesden, Rich
Propositus, Will le Blunt, Rich Goce, Adam del Hill, £2\
Thos. Propositus de Boilston, Nich Seledit, Thomas in Thornes,
and Wm. Scharp, \ m. ; Henry le Bercher de Boyleston, Henry
le Sewer, Robert Theluch and Nic Gurry de Boyleston, Richard
fil Nigel in Winfeld and Rich his brother. Ad Albyn and Thos.
Hill of Chesterfield, Peter fil Nic and German le Fuller, Adam
Albyn, Nic le Fonede, Thos. Drake de Eponis, Rich fil Rich,
Ad le Forester de Tounsted, Wm. fil Walter, Henry Coteril,
Robt fil Robt, Henry de Congesdon de Chelmarton, Nich
Cantrel, Ran de Weston, Thos. de St Quintain, Mic de Burton,
Egid de Roshal, Robt fil Will, Rad Martin, Nich fil Hugh
Caskin, Wm. Eykan de Chermanton, Thos. de Tunland, Roger
Wycher, Alan de Bosco, Galf de Aumarle, William de Farnedon,
Philip de Eveband, Wm. Sender, Roger de Upcotes, Hugo de
Ralegh, John de Latcombe, Wm. Lovel, Roger le Esquire, Robt
Alewys de Chepeston, John de la Bothe, John fil John, Elias de
Bradwell, Robert de Pek, Robt Quenild, Wm. le Foun, Wm.
fil Hugh le Wardlow, Wm. fil Wace de Hucklow, Rich de
Middleton, Rad de Bosco de Dunbridge, Nich de Swalmorton,
John de Gretton, Hugo de la Chambre, Walter de Annesley,
Rad de Bosco, Adam de Schepingbotilda, Richard Fox de
Tannesley, Roger fil Roger fil Stephen de Hutton, John de
Aumbly, former sheriff of Northm., John, Rector of the Church
of Normanton, Hugo, Rector of Kirkston, Roger le Brut £ 1 5
for having writ, so in Roll 4 Ed. II. (This note may have
been added afterwards.)

Rad Sampson, parson of Eperston, pledge Robert, pistor of
Eperston, and Herbert fil William de Wodburgh (Rad Sampson
was fined 10 marks for a venison trespass in 17 Ed. I., and his
pledges 'were Robert, pistor of Eperston, and Herbert fil

I

454 SOME FEE BOOKS AND FEODARIES-

WilHam de Woodburgh and another, evidently the same per-
sons. See the Pipe Roll for that year.)

Wm. Basset, John le Fleming, former bailiff of High Peak
(Pipe Roll shows that he was bailiff in 17 Ed. I.), Amic de
Saunay, Walter de la Grave, John le Fleming and Mat, his wife,
Robert de Pontesoen and John Jonesman. Adam le Fleming
and Rich le Spicer, John le Cuppere, John le Flemyng, Peter de
Toulouse, Robt. de Kesteven, John le Fleming, £T2 ; William
de Herdeby, Rad Sampson, John le Cup, Rich le Spicer, Wm. le
Moine de Carlton, Wm. fil Ad de Wynesle, Mich Molend de
Hagthorpe, Hy. le Blund de Newton, Margaret, widow of Roger
Wandel, pledges Wm. de Graham of the County Lincoln, Henry
de Bradbourn of the County Derby, Galf de Lagenham of
the County Norfolk, Roger Querdlion of the County Suf-
folk, Rowland, Parson of Eygrum, Malcolm de Harlegh,
after the death of Walter de Stand*. John de Bordesdon and
Peter de Clypston, Walter Denyas, Simon de Ardene, Robt. de
Reseby, Wm. de Langwath, Will de Carlton, Wm. de Flintham,
Maurice de Northampton and Natilie his wife, John de Briming-
ton, Galf ad Ponte de Essover, Rad Congeston, Hy. Coteril,
John fil Hugo le Bret, Robt Riebof, Wm. de Sapcotes, Hy,
Rowe, Henry le Mathon, Nic de Seledich, Thom in le Cleys,
Nich Terry, Robt. de Ernelegh, Will de Thorpe de Quintin,
Robt. Gilbard, Mathew Shereman, William Bercher, Peter de
Stoke de Boilston, Nic Gassy, Robt. Moneloye, Rad fil Sarra,
Rich fil Serlo de Redware, Thomas Propositus, Thomas fil Rad
of the same, Robt de Dyveleye, Wills Scharpe, Nicholas Fol-
jambe of Boilston, Thomas Propositus, Thos. in le Alers, Galf
de Stanle, Hy. de Rolston, Robt de Bothe, Thos. fil Hugh de
Dunting, Alexandre de Bosco, Wm. de Gamelesby, Roger de
Stratton, William de Chesterbir, Nic Games, Rich Kirkman,
Will de Wcstwood, Rc^er de la Booth, John le Mouner, Roger
Melun, Nich Foljambe, John le Flemyng, Robt de Henners-
dale de la John, brother of Thos del Medwe, Rich de Vernon
and Rich le Vernon, Junior, Roger le Rous! in Eyam.

Robert Tybetot, of the castle of Nottingham, with the king's
mill there, and the Haya of Beskwood, the soke of Horsley and
Horestan, from the 5th of Edward H., ;^22. The farm of
Mansfield, with the soke of Lindeby, and the mill of Carlton ;
the farm of Bolsover, and demesne lands and sette of Bolsover ;

SOME FEE BOOKS AND FEODARIES. 455

the farm of the Manor of Ashford in com. Derby, Macklesfield
in Chester, and Overton in Flint (This entry appears to prove
it to be a Roll of Edward II.)

Robert Bozon for the Castle and Honour of Peak.

Thomas de Stapelford, Henry de Quemdon, vill of Derby,
Wm. de Conesgrave, pson. of the Church of Foston, for the
Manor of Ingram de Baih'ol of Foston, and the rents which the
same Ingram had in the County of Derby, which for certain
causes were taken into the king's hands from the 14 Nov.,
Anno. 26. (See Pipe Roll for 28 Edward I., where this transac-
tion IS recorded, p. 258, Section I. This entry again shows the
Roll to be of the date of Edward II.)

Thom de Perers, for the rents of the Castle of Mitford, and
for all the lands and tenements of Robt de Stoteville, and Stoti
his brother in England, from the 10 Nov., the 22 year.

Robert Bozon, for rents of the Priory of Lenton, then in the
king's hands ; Walter Foun i m., Thom Propositus of Boylston,
Nich Selydet, Thom in Thornes, and Wm. Sharp, ^ in. ; Thos.
de Boyleston, Nich Lely de ead, Thos. fil Ralf de Albres, and
Thos. Clicus; Thom de Perers for the customary talliage of
Stratfield, 23 Ao. ; the same Thos. for the Manor of Gresham,
which was Robert de Stutevill's in Norf. for the years 23 to 26,
and for the grange and stocking the Manor of Bywell 4s. gd.,
and for the Manor of Staunford, Byfeld, Ekinton, Kirkeby,
Dylsam, Stratfield, and Beingfield, and Milford ; Rich de Kerkby
de Barton for the Manor of Barton, and Bradmere p. Thomas
de Perers ; Wm. de Friskenade j£S for selling bread contrary
to the Assize.

Nic Serjeant, of Thos. de Ladelowe. J m. p. pi. Robert fil
Ingram, of Nottingham.

Rad de Burgo, formerly Sheriff of Lane, 10 m. for many
defaults ; Thom le Ragged l m., Thom de Berde, heir of Rich
le Ragged, £6 6s. for rents.

Robert de Dovorr, clic, for the expenses of the lead mines
which Walter, Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield, had at
Wirksworth, from the 3rd Oct., the 1st year of Edward II.
(This is again proof that it is a Roll of the second Edward.)

Abbot of Roughford £7 for the aid for marrying the
daughter (of the father of the king), the Prior of Thurgarton
IDS. for the -same, Prior of Blida 20s., Prior of Ferriby 40s.,

456 SOME FEE BOOKS AND FEODARIES.

Abbot of Swinset 40s. for one fee in the Hundred of Bingham,
Abbot of Welbec £4 los. for the same. Prior of Brewode 20s.
for the same, Prior of No^oloco 2s. for tax on his rents in
Nottingham, Abbot of Derley ^£4 i6d. rents in Derby, Abbot
de la Dale Ss. tax in Derby (see Roll 3 and 4 Edward IIL)f
Mag House, of St. Leonard, 8s. tax, the Dean of St Mary's,
Lincoln, 8s. tax in Chesterfield ; Abbot, etc, of Alegate, 30s. 6J
for the Church of Herondon ; James de Sabello ;f 17 i m. for
i churches of Stoke and Cudington ; Pandolphus de Sabelio
;f 10 13s, 4d. for \ of the church of Farendon and Balderton.

Abbot of Derby 40s. tax in Derby, assessed in the 32d year
(see 4 Edward HL).

Abbot of Burton 4s. tax in Derby, Abbot de la Derley do. 3s.,
House of Lepers of Derby 42s. lod., Prior of Lenton 40s. aid,
Beatrix, widow of Alan le Carpenter, Will his son, the elder, and
Wm., the younger, fine, as contained in the 20th of the 2
Edward U.

457

CHAPTER XV.

1{(rbi?'0 ©uc0t-

(TAKEN 22-25 HENRY III.)

KlRBY*S Quest, as it is called, is valuable chiefly for the
insight it gives of the actual modus operandi pursued by the
justices itinerant when occupied with the important portion
of their circuit work — the taking inquisitions concerning
scutages.

This book has been much misunderstood, and is not nearly
so valuable as it is generally thought. It is not a general
survey, but simply a collection of various inquisitions taken at
different periods by different judges, and a number of separate
documents of a miscellaneous character, extents and escheats,
relating tq various counties, from the time of Edward I. to that
of Edward IV., when probably it was compiled. It is a collec-
tion made at a later date than the matter recorded, and it is
so roughly and badly made that it can scarcely have been
compiled for the use of the office, but would rather seem to be
the private work of some officer of the court, or perhaps only
of some one interested in historical collections, perhaps an
industrious scribe like Arthur Agard ; in fact, a work of no
authority, and only valuable because the records which it pre-
served may have been lost or destroyed. It may be that they
have disappeared because some mediaeval keeper of the records
was afflicted with the deplorable disease now so common, the
mania for pulping public records.
31

458. kirby's quest.

Only one of the scutage lists has the advantage of a date to
it, and as these documents were invariably dated for some
particular grant or iter, it is clear that this is not a formal record
upon which reliance may be placed. The dated Roll is one
for the County of Cornwall, and it is dated the 34 Ed. I. At
page 120 we find a heading thus: — "The Roll of fees which
are held of the king in capite and portions of such fees in the
Counties of Bedford and Bucks according to the inquisitions
then made before William fitz Nigel and his associates for this
purpose assigned by the king himself."

The other judges whose iters are recorded are the following : —

Galf de Sandiacre for Beds., fo. 132.

Philip Willoughby (the Chancellor) for Cambridge and
Huntingdon, f. 1 39 ; for Lincolnshire, 269 ; and for Nottingham
and Derby, 287.

John de Kirkby, Cornwall, 146; Devon, 151; York, 177;
Surrey and Suffolk, 335 ; and Leicester, with Richard de
Stanton, 339.

Richard de Stanford, Northampton, 275 ; Salop and Stafford,
299 ; and probably Oxford, 293.

John de Elton, Walter de Colt, Nich de Burt, John Ridal,
of Bessanby, and John de Poland for Ridale, 225.

Richard Rowells for Gloucester, 247.

R. de Northwort for Kent, 259. The other 29 counties have
no returns.

John de Kirkby is described at fol. 355 as the " King's
Treasurer." Hence possibly the book was named after him
upon as little justification as the Testa de Nevil was named
after that judge.

It is very difficult to determine the date of the Nottingham
and Derby portion of this Roll. If we judge from the names
of the tenants — and it would seem that this is the proper test —
it must date prior to the 9th Henry III., for Hubert fitz Ralf
is given as the tenant for Scarclive, and he died on or before
that year as before mentioned. It is impossible to state whether
a knight is still surviving simply because we find his name in a
scutage roll, the same roll being used for several scutages, but it
seems hardly probable that the name of a deceased knight
would be retained upon an inquest. Yet this Roll seems clearly
of a later date. Nicolas de Segrave did not succeed till 22

KIRBY S QUEST. 459

Henry II., so that it cannot be earlier than this date ; nor can
it be so late as 25 Henry III., for the Wardship of Crich then
terminated. It cannot be later than 26 Henry III., for Roger
de Walter died that year, and Henry de Grey, who was living
at the date of this Roll, died 30th Henry III.

(Fo. 287.) (Nottingham and Derby.) Roll of fees which are
held of the king in capite and of divers others in the Counties
of Nottingham and Derby, according to an inquisition there
made before Philip de Wyleby, Chancellor of the Exchequer,
and his associates assigned for this purpose.

(The portion for Nottingham omitted.)

WAP DE MORLESTON.

Crich. — Rich de Grey holds Cruch in ward for one fee of the

king in chief. (Ralf Freshville succeeded to Crich 25

Henry III.)
Codnor. — Henry de Grey holds Codenor for one fee of the king

in chief. (He died ante 30 Henry III.)
Denby. — Henry Russell holds Deneby of Robert de Tateshale

for one fee, and the same Robert of the king.
Ripley, Pentrice, Chilwell. — The Abb of Derb holds Ripley,

Pentric, and parts of Chilwell for two fees, which belongs

to the Barony of Crich.
Shipley. — Robert de Stredley holds the vill of Shipley in the

fright of Hebicabell, his wife, for half a fee of Will de Ros.
West Halum. — Ralf de Crumwell holds the vill of West Halum

for one fee of the Bishop of Lincoln, and he of the king,
Holbroke. — Ricusde la Rokel holds half of Holbrook for half a

fee of Wm. Bardolf, and he of the king.
Breydeston — Will Makerell holds half Breydiston for a fourth

part of one fee of William de Ros, and the same William

of Gilbert de Gant, and he of the king.
lUesden. — Will de Ros holds the vill of Illesdon for one fee of

Gilbert de Gant, and the same Gilbert of the king.

HALF WAPENTAKE OF LUCHURCH.

Clifton. — William de Codington holds Clyfton for one fee of
Walter de Riebof and John de Brimington, and the same
of Robert de Stuteville, and he of the king.

46o kirby's quest.

Kirklongleye. — Rad Pipard holds Kirklongley for one fee of
John de Conquest, and he of the heirs of Haversegge, the
said heirs of Robt de Stuteville, and the same Robert of
the king in chief.

Langley Meynil. — Will de Meynil holds Langley Meynil for
half a fee of Adam de Gridling, and the same of the heirs
of Haverseth, and they of Robert de Stuteville, and he in
chief.

Quorndon. — The Dean of Lincoln holds 3 pts. of the vill of
Quorndon of the Bishop and Chapter of Lincoln, and the
same Bishop of the king, service unknown. Robert
Sacheverel holds i of the said vill of Querendon of
William Barry, and he of Robert de Stuteville, and he
of the king, with the vill of Bolton, for half a fee.

Egindon. — Ralf Pipard J vill with its members, and i fee in
Etewell in the soke of Alcaston of Rad de Freshville, and
he of Wm. Bardolf, and he of the king.

Magna Ondam. — The Abbot of Burton holds Magna Ondam
with its soke of the king, but the service is not known.

Halwaston. — Ralf de Freshville holds Halwaston with its soke
for 2 fees of William de Bardolf, and he of the king in chief.
John Faunel holds one fee therein of the same.
Hugo de Hargrave, and the heirs of William de
Thokeston, hold one fee in the same of the sanae.

WAPP. DE SCARESDALK

Elmton, Holmton. — Edmund Deincourt held Elmton and Holm-
field in cap. for i fee.

Stavley. — John Musard held Staveley in cap. for i fee.

Scarclive. — Hubert fil Ralf, Manor of Scarclive, in cap. for 2
fees. (He died 9 Hy. HI.)

Ekington. — Robert de Stutevill, M. Eckington, cu memb., in
cap. for I fee.

Alfreton, Norton. — Thos. de Chaworth, M. Alfreton, and Norton,
of the Hon. of Tickill, in cap. for 2 fees, escheat of the king.

Tibshelf, S. Wingfield. — John de Heriz, M. Tibshelf and South
Wingfield, cu memb., in cap. for 2 fees.

Walton. — Roger le Breton, M. Walton, in cap. for I fee (he died
26 Hy. ni.)

kirby's quest. 461

Sutton. — Rich de Grey, M. Sutton-in-Dale, his wife's inheritance,

of Edmund, brother of the king, for i fee of the king in cap.
Syreland. — Robert de Grey, M. Syreland, of Henry de Grey,

for I fee, and the same Henry of the king.
Wystanton. — The Abbot of Derley, M. Wystanton, of John de

Heriz, by knight service, and he of Rad de Freshville, and

he of the king.
Stretton, Barlbro', Whitewell. — Ricus de Riebof held M. Stretton

of the M. of Barbro' of the heirs of Robert de Meynil, by

the service of i fee ; the same heirs hold the said manor,

with the Manors of Barlbro' and Whitewell, of Robert de

Stuteville, for 5 fees ; and Robert of the king in capite,

together with his Manor of Ekington.
Morton. — ^John Deincourt held M. Morton with its members of

John Deincourt, and he of Edmund Deincourt, and he in

cap.
Blackwell. — John fil Robert de Orreby held half the Manor of

Blackwell of Thom de Chaworth for one fee, and Thos. of

Rad de Frescliville, and he in cap.
Essover. — Robert de Reri.sby held the Manor of Essover of

Ralf de Freshfield for one fee, and he of the king in cap.
Docmanton. — ^The Abbot of Welbec held the Manor of Doc-

manton of the Manor of Ekington of Robert de Stuteville

for one fee, and he of the king.
Dore. — Rycus de Draycot and Matilde de Wellywyke, his wife,

held vill of Dore by serjeanty of the king in chief
Totingly. — Egid de Meynil held Totingly of William de Meynil,

his brother, for i part of one fee, and the same William of

the heirs of Mathew de Hathersage, and the same heirs of

the king in chief.
Steynesby. — The heirs of Roger le Savage held the Manor of

Steynesby of the king by the service of one sparrow hawk

into the Exchequer.
Dranfield. — ^John de Soreby held Dranefield with its members

in free marriage with his wife of Robert de Tattersal, and

the same Robert of the king, service unknown.
Chesterfield. — Nich Wake held Chesterfield of John Wake for

one fee of the king in capite.
Glapwell. — The heirs of Serlo de Plesley held the vill of Glap-

well for one fee of the king in capite.

462 KIRBY's QUEST.

BlackwelL-^Wm. de Somerville held the other half of the Manor
of Blackwell of Robert de Somerville for one fee, and
Robert of Thomas de Chaworth, and he of Ralf de Fresh-
field for one fee, and he of the king for one fee.

Ruethorn. — The Prior of Novoloco in Sherwood held the vill
of Ruethorn of the Honour of Tickhill.

Normanton and Penkeston. — Roger le Wyne held Normanton
and Penkeston for one fee of Henry de Grey, and the same
Henry of the king.

Langwood. — Henry Pierpoint held Langword for half a fee of
Simon Basset for the term of his life, and Simon of Edmund
Deincourt, and he of the king.

HUNDRED DE REPINDON.

Drakelow. - Galfry de Gresley held the Manor of Drakelow for
one fee of Edmund, brother of the king, and the same
Edmund of the king.

Newton. — Aurens de Selvein held Newton for one fee of the
same Edmund, etc.

Catton. — Aumeric de St. Amande held the vill of Catton for one
fee of the same.

Croxhall. — Richard de Curcon held Croxhall for one fee of the
same.

LoUington. — Galfrey de Gresley held Lollington for one fee of
the same.

Cotes. — Nich de Segrave held Cotes for one fee for the service
of one bow (Berselet) with a string of the king. Galfry de
Gresley held the same of the said Edmund. (Nic de
Segrave succeeded to this inheritance 22 Hy. HI.)

Childcot. — Giles de Berkeley held Childecot of the said Ed-
mund.

Stretton. — ^Walter de Stretton held Stretton for one fee of
Richard de Curfon (Curzon), and the same of the said
Edmund.

Morsam. — Anthony de Bek held Morsam of Roger de Mouhaut,
and the same Roger of the Honor of Chester.

Smithesby. — Wm. de Schepe held Smithesby of Nic de Segrave
for half a fee, and he of the king.

kirby's quest. 463

Horteshorn. — William de Horteshorn and Roger hold Horteshorn

of Theobald de Verdun for one fee, and the said Theobald

of the said Edmund.
Newhall. — Robert de la Warde holds Newhall with its members

for one fee of Theobald de Verdon, and he of the said

Edmund.
Bretby. — Nich de Seagrave held Bretby of the said Edmund for

the fourth part of a knight's fee.
Fornwerke. — Nic de Verdon held Fornwerke with its members

of Theobald de Verdon for one fee, and he of the said

Edmund.
Engilby. — Philip de Welwyby and Thomas Walmisgow hold

Engilby of John de Hastings, and the same John of the

said Edmund.
Stony Stanton. — Robert de Stanton holds half of Stony Stanton

of the said Edmund with four bovates of land in Sunchilby

for half a fee.

Ranulf fil Galfiy de Stony Stanton holds the other half

of Simon fitz Ralf of Coningsby, and the said Simon of

the Honor of Chester, service unknown.

464

CHAPTER XVI.

a Scutagc of tbc 4tb E&war& n.

(No. 91.3, PLACED AMONGST THE SUBSIDY ROLLS AT THE

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE.)

Account of Ralf de Brailsford and Robert le Touk, collectors
of the scutages of each knight's fee which is held of the king in
capite in the County of Derby, conceded to King Edward II.
for the army of Scotland, in the fourth year of his reign, for
which the said collectors were raising and collecting — that is to
say, a scutage of two marcs : —

HIGH PEAK HUNDRED.

Robert de Hausted, ^ of a fee in Blackbrook ; Thomas de
Furnival, i in Eyam ; Thomas Basset, i in Nether Haddon ;
Sibilla de Metham, i in Basselow ; Wm. Gernon, i in Bancwell.

SCARVEDALE HUNDRED.

Thomas Wake, i of a fee in Chesterfield, with its members ;
Edmund de Eyncourt, I in Elmton and Holmfield ; Rado de
Freschville and John de Crumwell, i in Stavelegh ; John de
Stoteville, ^ in Ekington ; Ralf fil Ralf de Freshville, 2 in Scar-
clyve ; Roger le Breton, i in Walton, of the Hon. of Peverel ;
Thomas de Chawortb, I in Alfreton and Norton, of the Hon. of
Tickhill ; John de Willougby and Wm. de Harcourt, i in
Pleslegh, of the Hon. of Tickhill ; John de Heriz, I in Tybshelf,

A SCUTAGK OF THE 4TH EDWARD II. 465

of the Hon. of Peverel ; Laurence de Paveley, i in South
Wingfield, of the Hon. of Peverel ; Thomas de Scales, i in
Routhorne (Tykill).

WIRKSWORTH WAPENTAKE.

Thom, Earl of Lancaster, 2^ fees for the whole Wapentake of
Wirksworth.

MORLESTON WAPENTAKE.

Richard de Grey, i fee in Codnore and Heanor (Pevl. Hon.) ;
Rad de Freshville, I J in Crich, Pentrich, and Ripley; Thos.
Bardolf, i in Okebrock ; Walter Epis Cestriae, 2 in Sallow, with
its sokes ; Henry de Beaumond, i in Ilkeston, with its members
(Hon. of Gant) ; Johanna, Lady of Tatersal, \ in Deneby.

WAP OF LUTCHURCH.

Thoixi Bardolf, i fee in Egington, Ambasd*eston, Alwaston
and Aylwaston, and Thurleston ; John Stoteville, ^ in Bolton
and Querendon.

ALLOWED BY THE WRIT OF THE KING.

The same Ralf and Robert seek to allow by the writ of the
king to John .de Crumwell, i fee in Staveley ; Laurence de
Paveley, I fee in South Wingfield ; Thomas de Scales, i in
Routhorne ; Thomas Bardolf, i in Okebroke, Egington, Ambol-
deston, Alwasle, Aylwaston, and Thurleston ; Walter, Bishop
of Chester, 2 in Sallow.

Sum — £30 i6s. 8d.

466

CHAPTER XVII.

LIST OF TENANTS HOLDING Ao (AN ENTIRE
KNIGHTS FEE) IN LAND WHO OUGHT TO
BE KNIGHTED, BUT ARE NOT (31 JULY, 6
EDWARD II.) (MISCELL. ROLL, No. 175, M. 21).

This is a very interesting return, though from the condition in
which it was found a short time since, evidently untouched since
the Record Office Report of 1 841, crumpled up (in a most
dangerous state, like so many of the so-called Tower Rolls, and
also many other documents at the Office), as if carelessly thrown
away some centuries since, it has evidently escaped the notice
of the searchers at the Record Office, and this is not remarkable,
since it would seem as if its value had been wholly unrecognised
by the officers themselves, for it is curiously placed in their
catalogue as a document "of no particular class," whereas it
forms a portion of a very important class ; indeed, the most
valuable series of records in the whole collection in proof of
peerage and pedigree claims, but which is wholly unrecognised
in the establishment. A class which might well be designated
" The Feudal Records," in which all lists of knights* fees, all fee
books, feeodaries, extents, scutages, and documents of a similar
kind, and even subsidies, when weeded of all miscellaneous
documents, should find a place. Surely a small portion of the
funds confidingly placed by the nation at the disposal of the
Master of the Rolls for the publication of MSS. not hitherto
published, might as honestly be diverted in extra pay to the
numerous class of officials (who ought to do this work without

LIST OF TENANTS (NOT YET KNIGHTED). 467

it), as it is now expended in the republication of Mr. Bohn's
Antiquarian Library, or in augmentation of the salaries of those
officers.

The late Sir Thomas Hardy regularly absorbed ^300 of this
fund for " editing chronicles," and his brother, the late Deputy,
when Assistant Keeper, also took the same sum, although both
of them were receiving the maximum amount of lawful salary.
The late Sir William Hardy received over ;f 1,000 for the repro-
duction of a French Chronicle which had just previously been
carefully edited in Paris, in which library it is deposited. And
during the period he acted as deputy, in succession to his
brother, he regularly received the ^£300 a year formerly paid to
his brother, although not one single sheet of print appeared
during the whole period, or is yet to be found on the bookshelf.
Several of the junior clerks are permitted to " edit chronicles "
on the same terms. One of them is actually bringing out the
Red Book (as already noted), although it has previously been
printed. Surely if this system, which appears to be inseparable
from the management of this Office, is to be tolerated, the
gentlemen permitted to "edit chronicles" ought to be directed
to do some useful work. There is some excuse for those
eminent scholars of Oxford and Cambridge, who share the rest
of the public funds between them. They of course prefer to
edit documents for the Master of the Rolls, which they have
previously edited for the trade, because it saves them from
personal attendance at the Record Office. But the officials
have no such excuse. These remarks are made in no carping
spirit, but because they are just, and, if attended to in future,
may save other County Historians from the labour forced upon
the author of practically editing these Rolls. The necessity of
bringing out these two Sections would have been avoided if the
Record Office had done its proper work.

To return to this Roll. It is, unfortunately, very imperfect.
It contains a large number of writs, but only returns for twenty-
five counties, some richer than others. That for Nottingham
and Derby is very poor, only five names between them ; whilst
Norfolk and Suffolk have as many as ninety-two. The order in
which they appear is simply that of chance : they are strung
together anyhow, upon a cord.

This Roll seems to prove that any one holding together, or

468 LIST OF TENANTS (NOT YET KNIGHTED).

in portions a full knight's fee at this period, was necessarily a
knight.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY.
Return made by Robert Jorce and William Fannel.

, John de Stoteville, of Kirkby — his pledges (to secure that he

f shall be knighted in due course), John de Langton and John

I Russel.

^ John de Cokefield — pledges, Wm. Rempston and John le

I Ward

I Ralf de Crumwell — pledges, Roger de Lameley and Simon le

i Fouler.

! John Deincourt — pledges, Galf le Morton and Reginald fil

! Isabella. Nevertheless, the said John is detained in such sick-
ness (infirmitate) that his life is despaired of

I Jollan de Neville — pledges, Wm. Bathley and John del Hill.

There are no more in my Balewick, who have 40 librates of

j land, of whom enquiry should be made.

469

CHAPTER XVIII.

Zbc Scutage of 30 Cbwarb i.

THE ROLL OF INQUISITION OF WILL FILL
NIGEL, JUSTICIAR, AND OF RALF SHIRLEY,
SHERIFF, PETER PICOT AND HENRY DE
BRAILSFORD, COLLECTORS OF THE AID, 30
AND 31 EDWARD I.

(From the Scutage Roll No. 91-2, placed amongst the Subsidy
Rolls, and from the copy transcribed into the Book of Aids,
fo. 176 b.)

DERB. WAPENTAKE OF MORLESTON AND LUT-

CHUCH.

The Bishop of Chester holds 3 pts. and 5 pts. of 240 pts. of i
fee in Sallow cu soka.

Ralf de Sacheverel, J in Hoppewell, of the Honour of Sallow.

Roger de Morteyn 8 pts. of i fee, held of the Hon. of Risley.

Martin de Wermondsworth and Wm. Pong 6th pt. in Wivels-
thorpe.

Hugo Tevery ^ in Eyton.

Thos fil Roger and Wm. fil Wm., ^ in Eyton.

William Pong, ^ Draycot

Simon de Greenhill, ^ Eyton.

Thos Earl of Lancaster, i Duffield.

Henry le Grey, i Codnor.

Thos. Tuchet, i Markeaton.

470 THE SCUTAGE OF 30 EDWARD I.

Rado de Freschville and Rob. de Dethic, ^ Crich.

The Abbot of Derley, 2 Pentrich and members.

Will de Roos, i Ilkeston.

Hugo Bardolf, i Okebroke, i Aylveston, with its soke.

Rad Pippard, i Kirklangley, 1^ Spondon.

Will Rosel, i Denby.

Rad de Cromwell, J West Halum.

Rad de Munjoie, 4 Lokhaw.

Sum, £2$ 4s.

WAPENTAKE OF HIGH PEAK.

Robt. de Hausted, i Blackbrook.
Roger Morteyn, i Eyton.
Robert Basset, J Nether H addon.
John de Metham, J Basselow.
Will Gernon, i Bankwell.

Agnes de Longford and Ad. de Goushill, t Haverseg.
John de Strelly, i Haselback.
Rico le Vernon, i Nether Haddon.
Elizth de Edeston and John Calvoner, J Assop.
Rich de Herthill, i Herthill.

Thos de Byleye and Rich Martel, J Lutton, Byleye, and
Chatsworth.

Sum, ;;£lO.

WAPENTAKE DE REPENDON.

(Nic) John de Seagrave, | Bretby, cu members.

Aldred de Sulney, i Newton.

Galf de Gresley, i Gresley and LolHngton.

Will de Curzon, i Croxhall.

Almericus de St. Amande, i Catton, with its members.

Robt. de Stony Stanton, J Stanton.

Robt. de Montealto, i Walton, with its members.

Robert le Ward, i Nova Aula.

Nicol de Verdon, J Fornweck, with its members.

Robt de Farnham and Ralf de Ireland, i Hertishorne.

The heirs of Giles Berkely, i Childcote. .

Sum, ^15.

THE SCUTAGE OF 30 EDWARD I. 47 1

WAPENTAK DE SCARESDALE.

Edmund de Eyncourt, i Elmton and Holmfield.
Robt. Freschville, Margaret Musard, and Wm. de Chelardeston,
I Staveley.
Robert Stoteville, 2 Eckington.
Rad Freschville, 2 Scarclive.
Thos. Chaworth, 2 Alfreton and Norton.
John de Langford and Walter Goushill, 1 Kinwaldemersh.
The Bishop of Durham, J Plesleye.
John de Heriz, 2 Tibshelf and Wynefield.
Ralf de Welwyk and Rich. Draycot, J Dore.

Sum, ;^24. Sum total, £j2 4s.

DIVERS FEES WHICH RAD DE SHIRLE, PETER
PICOT, AND HENRY DE BRAILSFORD, COL-
LECTORS OF THE AID OF EACH KNIGHTS
FEE IN THE COUNTY OF DERBY, IN THE
YEAR 31, CHARGED BY THE FEE BOOKS.
BEYOND THE FEES WHICH WERE CHARGED
UPON THE INQUISITION.

WAPEN OF SCAREDALE.

Rad Basset, 2 pts. of i in Langwath.

John de Eyncourt, \ Moreton.

Thomas Wake holds the Manor of Chesterfield, with its mem-
bers, in the same county, and in other counties, for 3 knights'
fees.

Rad de Braylesford, \ in Wyngre worth.

The Lady of Wyn, i in Pinkeston.

Rad de Glapwell and Roger Somerville, i Glapwell.

Roger Breton, i fee in Waleton.

Rado de Reresby, Henr Musters, The Lady Pierpoint, and
Ada de Reresby, i fee in Eshover.

Joim de Stuteville, 3 fees in Eckington, besides 2 fees which
are charged upon the Inquisition.

Sum, ;f2i 1 6s. 8d.

472 THE SCUTAGE OF 30 EDWARD I.

HUNDRED DE MORLESTON.

The Lady de Braideston, J in Breydeston.

Thomas de Bardolf, ^ Ekington, Advvalton, Okebroke,
Ambaldeston, J besides the fee charged by the Inquisition.

William de Cantelupe, ^ Ilkeston, Shippley, and Stanton.

Will le Herborour, J Spondon.

The Master of St. Lazarus of Burton, 2 parts of i Spondon,
and i fee in Kilburn.

Henry de Grey, 2 Codnor, besides the fee charged in the
Inquisition.

Robert Dethic, 2 parts of i in Lutchurch.

Rich de Grey, I Kirkhalum.

Abbot of Derby, 2 in Riply.

Sum — £14 i6s. 8d.

WAPEN OF REPYNGDON.

Will de Shepeye, J in Smythesby.
Ralf de Gresley, i Lynton.
Walter de Stretton, i Stretton.
John de Seagrave, 3 parts of i, Lynton.

Rad de Monte Alto, i Walton and Mesham, besides the J fee
charged upon the Inquisition.

Sum — j£S IDS. od.

HUNDRED OF PEAK.

Rico Vernon, i fee, Hadon and Basslowe.
Thos. de Furnival, J Middleton.
John Bozon, i Edensor.
Laur de Lilleford, J Moneyash.
The Prior of Lenton, i Blackwell with its appurts.
„ I Blackwell.

Sum — ^10.

HUNDRED OF APELTREE.

William Bardolf (Baillios), | in Sutton.

Walter de Montgomery, 3, |, i, Marcheston and Cubbele.

THE SCUTAGE OF 30 EDWARD I. 473

Gerard de Camville, ^ Hoka.

Will Baillos, ^ Sutton.

Rad de Monjoie, i Yeldersley.

Rico de Riebof, J Etewell.

Rad de Brailsford, | in Brailsford.

Robt de Stafford and John de Chandos, i Moggington.

Robt de Shelford and his tenants, \ Murcheston.

Rad de Curzon, J Ketelston.

Rad de Bakepuz, 3 parts in Alknfianton.

Rad de Rochford, 3 parts in Ashe.

Hy. de Kneveton, J in Bradley e.

John de Bakepuz, i Barton.

Walter Waldshelf and John Zeuch, ^ in Boilston.

Robt Montjbie, i Tvvyford.

Will Odingselles, two parts of i in Trusleye.

Hamond de Sapurton, J part of i fee in Sapurton.

Robt. de Stafford and John Chandos, I Rodburn.

Sum — j£iO 17s o^d.

Sums of the whole ;^86 4s. Qd. for 43 | fees, which the said
Collectors charged by the fee books of the Exchequer now
existing, and which were beyond the fees charged by the
Inquisition.

32

474

CHAPTER XIX.

Zbc £oolt of Uit>8.

Particulars of the composition of William de Grey, of Sandi-
acre, and Robert Zouch, collectors of the aid of 40s. granted
to the king at Westminster upon each knight's fee in the County
of Derby for knighting the eldest son of the king (Edward III.)
by the king's letters pateot, dated the first day of November, in
the 20 year of his reign.

(Tkf names placed in brackets are those of the tenants holding
30 Edward L)

(20 EDWARD III.)

HUNDRED OF MORLESTON.

The Bishop of Chester holds 3 pts. and 5 parts of 208 parts
of I fee in Sallow cu sok.

Wm. Saucheverel, i of i in Hopwell, formerly Ralf Sacheverel.

Rico de Willoughby, \ Risley (Roger de Morteyn).

Wm. Ponger, \ Wyvelsthorpe (Martin Wesmondsworth).

Wm. Teverey, ^ Eyton (Hugo Teverey).

John de Eyton, tt Eyton (Thos. fil Roger).

Wm. Poncher, yV Draicot (Wm., his father).

Simon de Greenhill, ^V Eyton (Simon, his father).

Henry, Earl of Lancaster, 1 Duffield (Henry, Earl of Lan-
caster).

John de Grey, i Codnor (Henry de Grey).

Thomas Tuchet, i Maketon (Thomas, his father).

Roger Beler and Galf de Dethic, \ Crich (Ralf de Freschville).

THE BOOK OF AIDS. 475

Abbot de Derby, 2 Pentric, cu member in pure alms.

Nic de Cantelupe, r Ilkeston (Wm. de Ros).

Hugo Bardolf i Ockbrook (Hugo, his father).

„ I Alvaston cu sok (Hugo, his father).

John de Twiford, yV Spondon and half a fee in Kirklongley
(Rad Pypard).

Robt. de Irelond, i Lokhaw (Rad Monjoie).

John fil William and Hugo Makerell, i Breydeston.

Hugo Bardolf, ^ Ekington, Alvaston, Ockbrook, Ambaston,
(Thos. Bardolf).

Nic de Cantelupe, J Ilkeston, Shipley, and Stanton, (William,
his father).

William le Herborour, ^ Spondon (William, his father).

The Master St. Lazarus, of Burton, 2 pts. Spondon, in free alms.

John de Grey, 2 Codnor (Henry de Grey), and 2 fees in
Deneby (^Wm. Rosel).

Galf de Dethic, 2 pts. of i Luch (Robert de Dethic), and
I Kilburn.

Wm. de Grey, J Kirkhalom (Richard de Grey).

Abbot of Derley, 2 Rippeley, in free alms.

Sum — fees, 19J and -^ pts. of one fee ; money, £3g os. 8d.

APELTREE HUNDRED.

Edmund de Berford, ^ Sutton (Wm. de Bailliol).

Waltr de Montgomery, 3| and | in Marchinton, Cubbely,
Sudbury, Aston, Snelleston, Eyton, Seggishall, Oslaston, Sonasal
(Waltr, his grandfather).

Jacob de Shirley, J Hoka (Gerard de Cawyle.)

Ed. de Berford, i Sutton (Will de Baillios).

Robt. de Irlond, i Ildresley, cu. membs (Rad de Munjoie).

Robt. de Ingram, j^ Etewell (Rico de Riebof).

Henr. de Brailsford, J Brailsford (Ralf, his father).

Roger Curzon, J Ketelston (Ralf, his grandfather).

John Bakepuz, 3 pts. of i Alkmanton (Ralf de Bakepuz).

John at Rochford, 3 pts. of i Ash (Ralf, his father),
„ Brounadeston, „

Hy. de Knyveton, J Bradley (Henry, his grandfather),

John Bakepuz, i Barton (John his father).

John Zeuch and Walter Rid ware, \ Boilston (Walter Walde-"
shelf).

476 THE BOOK OF AIDS.

William Cruker and Ralf Shay, i Twiford (Robert Munjoie).

Wm. Dodingselles, 2 parts of I Trusley (William, his father).

Wm. de Sapton, J Sapton (Hammond, his father).

Walter Toke, John Tummoner de Walton, and John Murcas-
ton, I Radburn and Eggington (Robert de Stafford).

John Chandos, i Rodburn, Eginton, Mogginton, and Atlowe,
(Edward de Chandos, his father, and Robert de Stafford).

Robt de Shelford, J Murcaston (Robert, his father).

Sum — fees, 15 and 27 parts ; money, £^0 J yd.

HUNDRED DE SCARSDALE.

William Deincourt, i Elmton and Holmfield (Edmund Dein-
court).

Anker de Freschville, Thos. de Wattelun, and the abbot of
Beauchief, I Staveley (Rad de Freschville).

John Darcy, 2 Okington (Robt Sottevill).

The Prior of Newstead, in free alms, i Scarclive (Rad de
Freschville).

Ralf de Freschville and heirs of Ralf, i Scarclive.

Thomas de Chaworth, 2 Alfreton and (Glotton) Norton.

Nich de Longford and Thomas de Ennishull, i Kinwaldmsh,
(John de Longford).

The Bishop of Durham, John de Willoughby, and Wm. de
Harcourt, J Plesley.

Roger de Belers, 2 Tylnehelf and Wingfield (John de Heriz).

John de Westwyk, Thos. Draycot, | Dore (Ralf Westwyk).

The hrs. of Rad Basset, 2 pts. of I Langwath.

Wm. Deincourt, | Morton (John Deincourt).

Thos. de Wake, 3 Chesterfield, cu. members in Derby and in
other counties.

Henry de Brailsford, i Wingerworth (Rs^d de Braelsford).

John de Wyn, J Penkeston (The Lady of Wyn).

Robt. de Glapwell, J Glapwell (Ralf de Glapwell), and the hrs.
of Rob. de Somerville.

Robt. de Bretton, i Walton (Roger de Bretton).

Adam de Reresby, i Eshovre (Ralf de Reresby).

John Darcy, 3 Ekington (John de Stoteville).

Sum — fees, 22J, \, and i ; money, £4$ l6s. 8d.

THE BOOK OF AIDS. ^ 477

THE HUNDRED OF REPYNDON.

John de Seagrave holds ^ in Brettby, cu. members (John de
Seagrave, his grandfather).

Alured de Sulney, I Newton (Aldred, his father).

John de Gresley, I Gresley and LoHington (Galf, his father),

Thomas Curzon, i Croxhall (William, his father),

Almaric St. Amand, I Catton, cil members (Almaric St.
Amand, his grandfather).

Robt de Stony Stanton and John de Sheppey, i Stony
Stretton (Robert de Staunton, his father).

The Queen Isabella, i Walton, cu. memb (Robt. de Montealto).

Giles de Meynil, \ Novo Aula (Robert de la Ward.)

Elias de Verdun, J Fornwerk (Nich de Verdon).

Wm. de Ireland and Roger Everdon, J Hertshorn (Robert
Farnam).

Thos. de Berkeley, J Childcot (Giles de Berkeley, his grand-
father).

John de Shepeye, i Smithesby (William, his father).

John de Gresley, i Lynton (Galfry, his father).

John de Stretton, i Stretton (Walter, his father).

John de Seagrave, 3 pts. of l Linton (John de Seagrave, his
grandfather).

The Queen Isabella, i Walton and Meysham (Robert de

Montealto).

Sum — fees, iij and i ; £^3 ^os,

HUNDRED OF HIGH PEAK.

Nich de la Forth, J Blackbrok (Robt de Hansted).

The Lady Monteacuto, I Eyton (Roger Morteyn).

John de Mettham, i Baslowe (John de Mettham, his father).

John Basset, i Nether Haddon (Robt Basset).

John Gernon, i Blackwell (William, his father).

Nic de Longford, i Hanlegh (Agnes de Langford and Ada
de Goushill).

Phil de Strelly, i Haselbec.

Richard de Vernon, J Netherhadden (Richard, his father).

Elias Verdun, i Alsop (Elizabeth de Edneston and Jo. de
Calvoner).

478 THE BOOK OF AIDS.

Richard de Herthill, J Herthill.

Thos de Baggeley and Rich Martel ^ in Luttun and
Beggeleye and Chatsworth.

Matilde Vernon, I Haddon and Basselewe (Richard Vernon).

The Lady Montecute, J Middleton (Thos de Furnival).

John Bozons, i Ednesore.

Laur de Lilleford, | Monyash.

Prior of Lenton, i Blackwell, with* its appurts.

Prior of Lenton, i in Blackwall.

Sum — Fees, 9J and J. ^^19 los.

Sum total knights' fees, ;^IS7 i8s. Qd. for 78 fees, 4, i, i,
and A-

479

CHAPTER XX.

a nDu0ter 1?oU of 21 £bwarb m.

The following Muster Roll is copied from Wolley's MSS. in
the British Museum, No. 6698, fol. 182. It is of great interest
Although only a copy, it may be valuable as legal evidence,
since the whole of the early Muster Rolls deposited in the
Record Office have within the last few years been pulped, as
appears by the returns on the subject of the destruction of
Records made to Parliament.

It can be dated definitely by the entry relating to John Lord
Darcy, who was then in custody. His father died 21 Edward
III., and he himself was summoned to Parliament the following
year. It was made before Reginald de Grey and other Justices,
at the Feast of St. Innocent, Edward III.

BOLSOVER.

Richard de la Vache is Lord of Bolsover, and with the king s
army in France ; and has with him one armed man and two
archers; and in the same vill are 4 free tenants — Roger le
Peinerton, William le Wright de Clown, Thomas fil Gilbert, Rich
Marjori — who each have goods worth 40s. ; and in the same vill
also are two bowmen — Henry le Webster and William fil Hugo.

BARLBRO AND WHITEWELL.

Thomas de Goushill, lord of one-third of the Manors of
Barlbro and Whitewell, remains in the country.

John de Hyde, lord of another third, is in the army.

Thomas Rednes and Ranulf de Rye, lords of another third.
Thomas has to the value of c. s., and Ranulf has lands 20s.

48o A MUSTER ROLL OF 21 EDWARD IIL

Free tenants — John del Byrks 40s., Wm. Clackwell 40s., Roger
Folville 4 m., with two bowmen, Robert le Wayht and Wm.
Godfrey.

KINWALDEMERS, DORE, AND TOTLEY.

«

Nich de Beck and Ralf de Welwyk are with the king s army.
Free tenants (in goods) — Wm. de Romlay 20s., Wm. Ward
20s., Rad de la Forth 20s. ; i bowman, Wm. Dankyman.

BEIGHTON.

Henry fil Henry, Lord of Beighton, with the king's army in
the company of the Earl of Richmond. Free tenants — Will de
Staynton 40s., Robt del Peck 40s. ; i bowman, Henry de
Marcham.

SCARCLIFF AND PALTERTON.

John Freschville, lord of half same, and within age, and in
custody of the king, and is in the king's army in France, and
in the company of John de Wyncoyk, Chev. Prior of Newstead
is lord of the other half. Roger Somer, his goods, 4 m. i bow-
man, Wm. Sakare.

GLAPWELL AND ROUTHORN.

The Prior of Newstead lord of half Routhom.
The Abbot of Derley has 5 bovates in Glapwell; Robert de
Glapwell has 4 m. in land ; i bowman, John Doget.

PLEASLEY.

John de Willoughby and Ralf de Ferrars are lords, and they
are with the army in France. Rad de Wod, goods 20s. ; i
bowman, Adam Tayler.

DOCMANTON.

Abbot of Welbec lord ; Henry de Docmanton, free tenant,
40s. ; I bowman, John Coke.

STAVELEY.

Anker de Freschville, lord, is with the army, and in the
company of John de Grey. Reginald de Lacy, lord oif one-third
part, has lands worth iocs. Thomas de Wortley rents there

A MUSTER ROLL OF 21 EDWARD IIL 48 1

40s. ; Edmund Savage, lands and goods, 40s. ; John de Brim-
ington, lands 20s. ; Robert de Norton, goods 20s. ; Will del
More, 20s. ; i bowman, Alexr. Bradschaw.

EKYNTON.

John fil John Lord Darcy lord, and in the custody of the
king, and within age. Free tenants — Wm. Dolphin has goods
40s. ; Wm. Smith, 20s, ; Robert Jolyf, 20s. ; 2 bowmen, John
and Roger de Bromley.

STEYNESBY.

Isabella, widow of John de la Legh, lady, has lands worth 10 m.

Freemen — John de Herdwick, 40s. in lands ; Robert Savage,
40s. goods ; Richard Savage, 20s. lands ; i bowman, John
Wyndgate.

SUTTON-IN-THE-DALE.

Wm. Grey. Lord of Sutton, 5 m. Free tenants — Bertram de
Bolingbroke with the king's army, and in the company of Simon
Simeon ; Richard Bevereg, 20s. ; Wm. de Blythworth. 20s. ; i
bowman, Thos. fil Wm.

NORMANTON AND PENKESTON.

Odo Hodynet, lord, and has lands £^5- Two bowmen, John
le Smith and Thos. fil Jacob.

TYBSHELF.

Roger Beler, lord, is in the army in the company of the Duke
of Lancaster, with one freeman. Rich Francis, goods 40s., and
2 bowmen, Richard Stephen and John fil John de Docmanton.

*
ALFRETON.

Thomas de Chaworth is Lord of Alfreton, £10, Simon de
Birtvill, 40s. ; bowmen, John Osmond and Henry de Ufton.
Thomas, Lord of Norton^ as.; i freeman, 40s. ; 2 bowmen,
Adam Farcar and Robert fil Hugo.

DRON FIELD.
Bowman, Richard Chapman.

482 A MUSTER ROLL OF 21 EDWARD IH.

ENDORSEMENT UPON ROLL.

There are 29 vills besides the vill of Chesterfield, and 19 lords
of vills aforesaid, besides other armed men, are with the king in
France. Wm. Deincourt is lord of 2 vills. He is not assessed,
because he is in the custody of the King of France.

Ekington and Palterton are in the king's hands. Scarcliff,
Brampton and Normanton, Duckmanton, Routhorn and Wysing-
ton, are' not assessed, amongst other reasons because they are in
the hands of religious. The following were also mentioned : —

Reginald de Grey, Lord of Shirland.

John Curzon, Lord of Wingerworth.

John Trusbot, Lord of half Bakewell.

Thos. de Bernhall, Lord of Stretton.

Thos. de Holland, Lord of Chesterfield, in which town no one
is bound to become an armed man, except six archers in the
said town who are skilled in hunting, and not more than 28 are
in the service of the king in parts abroad.

483

CHAPTER XXI.

H Scutafic of 13 tycnvi iv.

A RETURN OF THOSE HOLDING LAND, ETC., IN
THE COUNTY WORTH ;^20 A YEAR.

(PLACED AMONGST THE SUBSIDY ROLLS OF THE PUBLIC RECORD

OFFICE, ANI> NUMBERED 91-44.)

(2 JANY. 13 HENRY IV.)

CerHficate of John Dabridgecourt, Chev., Nicolas Longford
Chev. and Ralf Makerel, Sheriff of Derby, and Wm. Ulker-
thorpe, Escheator of the Lord King of all and singular men
and women holding lands worth 20/., and rents of the same
amount per annum, in the County of Derby, by virtue df the
king's letters patent, dated the 8th day of Jany., in the 13th
year of his reign.

Barley, Robert, 20/.; Barton, Hdwkin, de., 10/.; Berford,
Elizabeth, widow of Baldwin, 22/. ; Blount, Sanchia, widow of
Walter, 20/., an annuity from Hartington, 100/. ; Blount, John
Chev., an annuity from Tutbury, 60/., also an annuity payable
by the hands of the sheriff, 20/. ; Bonington, John, 10/. and
an annuity from Tutbury, 20/. ; Bowre, Thurston de, 20/., also a
life annuity from Peak, 20/. ; Bradbourne, John, 20/. ; Brad-
shaw, Roger, 44 m., also an annuity from Tutbury, 10 m. ;
Chaworth, Thos. Chevallier, 45/. ; Cledron, Richd., 40/. ; Cokyn,
John Chev., 40/., also an annuity from the vill of Askbourne, 40/. ;
Crumwell, Rad Chev., 20/. ; Crumwell, Domina de, at Dronfield,
10/. ; Cumberland, Johanna, 10 m. ; Curzon, Will, of Croxton,
7/. 8s. ; Curzon, John, 20/. ; Dabridgecourt, John Chev., 40/., also
an annuity from Tutbury and Duffield, 75/. 13s. ^d. ; Darcy,

484 A SCUTAGE OF 1 3 HENRY IV.

Dna, rents at Ekington, 40/. ; Deincourt, Dna Alisia, 20/. ;
Dethic, Robert, 20/. ; Ferrars, Dna de Groby, 23/. ; Fitzherbert,
Henry, 20/. : Flaxman, Wm., 6 m., also an annuity from Tutbury
and High Peak, 23/. ; Foljambe, Thomas, 20/. ; Francis, Robert
Chev., so/., also an annuity from Tutbury, 40/. ; Francis, Ralf,
26/. ; Frescheville, Ralf Chev., 20/. ; Fyndon, John, 40/. ; Gled-
row, Rich, 40/. ; Goushill, heirs of Nic, 20/. ; Gresley, Thos. Chev.,
65/., a life annuity from Tutbury, 26/. ; Grey, Ricus Chev., 40/.,
also the Castle of Hersthorn for life, 20/. ; Grey, heirs of the Lord
of Shirland, 40/. ; Grey, Emlyn, 20/. ; Halghten, Omphrey, 20/. ;
Hally, John, an annuity from High Peak, 20/. ; Holand, John
Chev., 20/. ; Horton, Roger, 12/. ; Hosey, Hugh Chev., 10/. ;
Ingwardby, Wm., 21/.; Ireland, Robert de, 20/.; Johanna,
Queen of England, 46/. los. ; Kent, Dna de, 40/. ; Kniveton,
Johanna, widow of John de, 20/. ; Lathbury, Alfred Chev., 20/., a
life annuity from Tutbury, 20/. ; Longford, Nicholas, 40/. ; Leche,
Roger Chev., 40/., also an annuity from High Peak and Tutbury,
86/. ; Leek, John de, 20/. ; Lynford, Thos., 10/. ; Lytton, Robt.
Chev.. 20/., rent at Bolsover, 20/. ; Melbourne, Peter, 26/, and a
life annuity from Tutbury and Melbourne, 86/ 13s. 4d. ; Mont-
gomery', Nic. Chev., 72/, also an annuity for life from Tutbury,
40 m. ; Morley, Goditha, 40/ ; Mattesdon, Nicolas, 17/ ; Myners,
Richard, 10/ ; Nevile, John fil Com Westmoreland, 52/ ; Norfolk,
Elizabeth, Duchess of, 60/. ; Okeover, Dna Ah'ce, 20/ ; Philip,
John, 10/ ; Pierpoint, Ed. Chev., 20/ ; Plumpley, Robt., 40/. ;
Plumton, Robert Chev., 40/ ; Pole, Peter de la, 50/ ; John Pole
de Hertington, 20/. ; Rempston, Margaret, 40/ ; Reresby, Nicolas,
10 m., an annuity from Tutbury, 20 m. ; St. Mount. Isabella Dna,
10 m. ; Sauvage, John, 20/ ; Shepey, John, 10 m.; Shirley, Beatrix,
wo. of Hugh Chev., 26/, a life annuity from Tutbury, 100 m. ;
Stanhope, Rich. Chev., 10 m. ; Stafford, John, 10/, an annuity
from Tutbury, 10/. ; Stafford, Dna Alice, 40 m. ; Staveley, Ralf
Chev., a life annuity from Peak, 33/. ; Strelly, Nic. Chev., 20/. ;
Strelly, John Chev., 33/ ; Stretton, Dna Margaret, 20/ ; Swyl-
lington, Roger Chev., 45/ ; Swynerton, John, 5 m. ; Swynbourn,
Dna de, 21/ ; Talbot, John Dom de Furnival, 20/ ; Tochet,
John, 40/ ; Trussebot, John, 20/ ; Twyford, Robert, 44 m., a
life annuity from Bolsover, 18/ ; Tykhale, Thomas, 40/ ; Wolla-
ton, Wm., 20/ ; Zouch, William Chev., 20/ ; Zouch, John Chev.,
an annuity from Ilkeston, 20/

485

CHAPTER XXII.

H X(0t of linifibta' f eee, etc, 6 tycnv^ vi.

Inquisition made at Derby before Ralf Shore of Derby,
Thomas Maysham and his companions, Commissioners of the
King. By virtue of the same Commission the aforesaid Thomas
and Ralf and their companions directed for inquiring concerning
the knights' fees within the said county, on the Friday next
before the feast of the nativity of St. John the Baptist, in the
6th year of the reign of King Henry VI. (Public Record Office,
Exchequer Book of Fees, fo. 54)

This account is made up relatively to that of the Book of
Aids. The names of those placed in brackets are those of the
tenants who are described as holding in the 20th Edward III.

Margaret, wo. of Thomas Rempstoli, Bt, held a J part of one
knight's fee in Hopwell, which formerly Wm. Sacheverel held,
and I Ockbrook (Hugo Bardolf).

John Lord Grey held two knights' fees in Codnore, formerly
Henry de Grey.

James Lord Daudely held i in Moreton (Thos. Tuchet).

John Graa Chev., 3 parts of i Crich (Roger Beler).

Thos. Babington, J of i Dethec (Wm. de Dethec).

The heirs of Wm. de la Zouch, Kt, i Ilkeston (Nic Cantelupe).

Wm. Pope, Esq., ^ Alvaston.

Thos. Blont Chev., i Alvaston (Hugo Bardolf).

Robert Twyford, J Kirklongley (John Twiford).

John Lord Grey, i Denby (John de Grey).

Ralf Lord Cromwell, i Westhalum (Ralf Cromwell).

486 LIST OF KNIGHTS' FEES OF 6 HENRY VI.

Ralf Makerell, i Bridgeston (Hugo Mecherel).

Nic Strelly, Chev., { Shipley (Nicolas Cantelupe).

The heirs of Simon Francis, i Stanton juxta dale (Nicolas
Cantelupe).

Godfrey Hulme, i in Codnor (Henry de Grey).

Thomas Babington and the heir of Edward Doile, 2 pts. of
I Lutchurch (Galf Dethec).

John de Leeke, J Kirkhalum (Wm. de Grey).

John Bradbum» i Hoka (Jac Shirley).

Thos. Blont, J Sutton (Edvvd de Berford).

Rad Shirley, Esq., J Braylesford (Hy de Brailsford).

John Curzon, Esq., ^ Ketelston (Roger Curzon).

Hrs. Nic Reresby, ^ Alkemanton (John Bakepuz).

Thos. Makeworth, J Ash (John Rocheford).

Thos. Blont Chev, i Barton (John Bakepuz).

Ricus Piper and John Coke, i Trusley (Wm. Bodingseles).

Wm. Sapton, J Sapton (Wm. Sapui ton).

Petrus de la Pole, 3 pts. of i Eggington (Walter Toke).

Petrus de la Pole, i Radburn, Eggington, Mogington, and
Attelow (John Chaundys).

John Duke of Norfolk, J Bretby (John Seagrave).

Aluredus Lathbury, 4 Newton (Alured Sulney).

Margt, wo. Nic Longford, Kt, and heir of Thos. Stafford, 4
Newton.

John Curzon, i Croxhall (Thos. Curzon).

Wm. Horton, i Catton (Almaric St. Amand).

John Francis, J Stonistanton (Robt. Stony stanton).

Wm. Lord de Ferrars, i Walton-sup-Trent (Isabella Queen of
England).

John Dethec, J Newhall (Egid de Meynil).

Isabella, wo. Robt. Francis, 4 Fornwerke (Elie de Verdon).

Roger Wolley, i Hertshorn (Wm. Ireland).

Nich Mattisden, i Childecote, (Thos. Berkeley).

Margt., wo. of John Shepey, i Smithby (John Shepey).

John Both, I Stratton-in-the-field (John de Straton).

The Duke of Norf., i Lynton (John de Segrave).

Nic Montgomery in Marchington, Cubley, Sudbury, Snelos-
ton, Ayton, Sedsale, Oslaston, and Somsales.

Robert Ireland, Yeldresley.

LIST OF KNIGHTS' FKES OF 6 HENRY VI. 487

DERBY INQUIST.— ROBT. SHORE AND THOMAS

MAYSHAM.

The Church of All Saints taxed at 33 marks, St. Peter 20 m.,
St. Wereburg, £6, St. Michael's 16 m.

DEANERY OF CASTLEACRE.

The Church of Trusley was taxed at 8 m., paid nothing
because there were not 10 inhabitants holding domicils. Church
of Mortone 8 m., nothing paid for the same reason.

HONOR DE SCARESDALE.

Then follows a portion of the Book of Aids, but without
referring directly to that date. The following entries are of
interest : —

John Darcy formerly held 2 fees in Ekington, but pays
nothing, because the fee is in the king's hands by reason of the
minority of the heir of the said John, and Henry Lord Fitz
Hugh has the custody of all the lands and tenements of the
said John, which were in the County of York and elsewhere.

The accuracy of the greater part of this return can be
vouched by a roll at the Public Record Office, dated 6
Henry VI., improperly classed as a subsidy, and numbered
1^, which contains the following scutages, which are omitted in
the Exchequer Book of Fees.

HUNDRED OF MORLESTON.

The Bishop of Chester 3J, |, y^, and ^V '" Sallow, with the
soke of Highfield.

The Abbot of Derley, 2 fees in Pentrich and 2 in Ripley.

Robt. Irlond, J in Lockay, which Rad Munjoie held.

Hugh Bardolf, J in Ekington, Alvaston, Okebrook, and
Ambaston.

Wm. Hervey, ^ Spondon, which Wm. Hervey held.

The Master of Burton St. Lazarus 2 pts. of a fee in Spondon.

John de Grey, I Codnor.

Rad Kays, i Kilborne.

488 LIST OF KNIGHTS' FEES OF 6 HENRY VI.

HUNDRED DE APPELTREE.

Henry Kniveton, ^ in Bradley, formerly Henry Kniveton.

John Zouch and Walter Ridware, ^ in Boilston, formerly
Waltr WaldshelC

Wm. Cruker and Ralf Shayle, i in Twiford, formerly Robt
Monjoie.

HUNDRED OF REPENDON.

John Gresley, i in Gresley and LoUington, formerly John de
Gresley.

Thos, Gresley, i in Lenton.

John Duke of Norfolk, i fee in Walton and Meesham, which
Isabella the Queen formerly held.

489

CHAPTER XXIII.

Zbc fco^avi of zrutburi?^

The following, styled •* The Feodary of Tutbury," is in fact the
Certificate of knights' fees of the Honour of Ferrars. It is taken
from a Roll which by the writing would appear to be of the 15 th
century, which is now deposited amongst the Wolley charters in
the British Museum (Select XL i.). There can be no reasonable
doubt that it is a copy of a genuine document, and it is pro-
bably part of the preceding Inquisition of 6 Henry VI. It is
not, in all probability, one of the four copies made at the date,
because the first part of the Roll is occupied with a copy of a
portion of Kirby's Quest for these counties, which was not the
last Inquisition taken, but it is probably a copy of a local
document, for the authography varies considerably from that
of the Public Office Records. This portion of the Holl termi-
nates with these words : All this yt ys before written from the
beginning of this, book is agreeable to the copy of the Ex-
chequer.

FEOD OF TUTBURY, AND FIRST OF THE COUNTY

OF DERBY.

Nicolas Montgomery holds the Manor of Sudbury, with the
advowson of the Church of Cubbely, Merchinton, Aston,
Snelston, Somersal, Eyton, and Roddesley for 5 knights' fees.
The same holds the Manor of Eiton.

Thomas Blount, knight, holds the Manor of Berton for i
knights' fee.
33

490 THE FEODARY OF TUTBURY.

(Nic) Reresby holds Alkmanton for 3 parts of i fee, and
in Holland for ^\j part of one fee, 6 cottages and i water
mill.

Thomas (John) Coke and Richard Tailor (Piper) hold in
Trusley, i fee.

Thomas Mackworth holds the Manor of Ash for 3 parts of
one fee.

John Holland, kt, holds the Manor of Dalberie, I messuage
and 3 carucates of land inBreydsal, for ij fees.

Thomas Dethic holds the Manor of Breydesal for J fee.

John Bakeborn (Bonington), holds the Manor of Breyaylston
and Berewardescote for i fee.

Henry del Bothe holds the Manor of Swynfin for ^ fee ;
Hilton and Egington ^ part of i fee.

John Knyveton holds the third part of that |th.

The same John holds in Hilton one part of the 3rd part of
that Manor.

Richard Vernon, kt., holds the Manor of Haddon and
Baslowe for one fee.

John Cokayn, kt, holds in Middleton half a fee.

Prior of (Beauvale) holds the Manor of Etewell for ^ fee.

Ralf Shirley holds the Manor of Brailsford and Wingerworth
for I fee, and Yeveley and Hollington for i a fee.

The Lady Johanna de Clinton holds J of the Manor of
Tissington i of a fee.

John Bradburn holds the Manor of Bradburn Hoghe, and i
carucate of land in Estcote, for i, ^, and :ipQ^ of i fee.

The Lady Johanna de Montgomery holds the Manor of
Makeley for J of I fee.

John Knyveton holds the Manor of Mercaston for J fee.

John Curzon, of Ketelston, holds the Manor of Ketelston for
I fee, and a fee divided into 5 parts.

Rad Twiford holds the Manor of Thurvaston, and 32 bovates
of land in Spondon and Chaddesden for ^ and ^^^ of a fee.

John Grey, Lord of Codnor, holds 32 bovates of land in
Spondon and Chaddesden of the Brethren of St. Lazarus and
William de Chaddesden, for one fee.

Robert Twiford, of Chaddesden, holds 23 a. of land.

Wm. Teve'y 6 acres of land and 5 acres Barre, and 6 acres of
land formerly Henry Breynes of Chaddesden, for :^ of I fee.

THE FEODARY OF TUTBURY. 491

The same William holds 23 a. of land and wood in Chaddesden
for Y*5 fee.

The Master of St. Lazarus of Burton holds 63 a. of land in
Lockaw of the heirs of Philip Marc for ^ of i fee. The same
holds the tenement which was William Sturye in the same for
i of I fee, and i carucate, formerly Robert le Wyne, in Lockaw,
for -Y*, of a fee.

John Birde holds 63 a. of land in Lockaw of the heir of Phih'p
Marc for ^ of i fee.

Wm. de Chaddesden, senr., 63 a. of land in Lockaw of the
heirs of the same Philip for ^ of a fee.

John Berde holds I messe. and 4 a. of land in Lockaw for ^ fee.

The Master of St. Lazarus holds 60 a. in Lockaw in clause

for jV of I f^^-
The heirs of Peter de Neville and Wm. Cardell hold i

messuage and i carucate of land in Windeley, and 20 a. of

land in Chaddesden for ^ of one fee.

Richard Byron holds the Manors of Alton and Hordelow for
J of I fee.

Thomas Blount holds i mess, and i carucate of land in
Holland for ^iy of i fee. Thos. de Wollaton land in Hyeyley
-^jf fee, and 30 a. of land in Matlock, formerly Rad de Winfield,
for :i^ of a fee.

Roger Tissington holds 24 a of land in 3 fields of Hazelwood,
for 1^ of one fee.

Thos. Clynton holds 40 a. of land and meadow, formerly
Wm. de Breydsell, in Duffield, for ^jj of one fee.

Wm. de Rolleston holds the 3rd part of the Manor of Hilton,
and I mess, and i car. of land in Swerkeston for ^ and ^^ of i.

Edward Fuljiam holds the Manor of Elton in Pec for J fee.

John Morell held I mess, and 4 a. of land in Scropton for -/(^.

John fil Richard holds i messe. and 30 a. of land in New-
biggin for ^.

Wm. Curzon holds the Manor of Croxall, Quenyborough, and
Stretton, with its members, for 2\ fees.

Roger Horton holds Catton and Twicross for i fee.

Robert Legh.

Alveredus Lathbury holds the Manor of Newton for i fee.

Nich Longford, kt., holds J part of the said Manor for J.

Sir Robert ShefTel.

492 THE FEODARY OF TUTBURY.

Alina de Stafford holds J of the said Manor for 3 pts. of i.

Henry Vernon, kt, holds the Manor of Appleby, i fee.

Thos. Gresley, kt., holds the Manors of Gresley, Lambton,
Lynton, Assebi, Bilderston, Norton, Swarlington, and LuUing-
ton, for 3 fees.

Rad Shirley holds the Manors of Shirley, Hoone, Bradley,
Rollegrene, and Bythome, for 5 fees.

Seniores Berkeley.

John Seagrave holds the Mill of Bretby, J of i.

Thomas Goushill holds 3 a. waste in Matlock for jV

Henry Kniveton holds 30 a. of land in Kingswood for

tV of I.

Nick Skone holds i mess, and 30 a. of land in Wineley ^.

Robert de Stanton holds the Manor of Stanton J.

The heirs of Theobald Verdun hold the Manors of Worthing-
ton, Hartshorne, Fornwyke, and Stanton Harald, for 2 fees, of
which the Lord of Worthington holds that Manor for ^ of a fee-
Hartshorn for I fee, Fornwyke for J, and Stanton Harald for
I fee.

Anthony Fitzherbert, with other heirs.

John Coton holds J Manor of Boyleston, fee J.

The Lord Montjoie.

John Saperton holds the other half of the manor for ^ of i.

Thomas de Stathun holds certain lands and tenements in
Edrickshay for ^ part of I fee.

Peter de la Pole holds Rodburn, Egington, Mogington, Atlow,
and Monaslow in the County of Salisbury, for i fee.

The heirs of Henry Tym worth hold in Eggington ^ of i.

Peter de la Pole held in Rodburn J of I fee, formerly Thomas
de Stanton.

Thos. Dethic holds in Rodburn i of i fee, formerly John de
Walton.

William de Rolleston holds in Mogington, Atlow, and Mouns-
low J of I fee.

Robert Tok holds in Hatton i mess. anS J car. in Pilecote,
for -^j^ part of i fee.

Thomas Blount (Lord Monjoie) childe holds the Manors of
Sutton and Herbereburg, in the County of Warwick, for one
fee and a half, and Sapurton for J fee.

The Lord Fumival holds in Brassington { of i ; the same

THE FEODARY OF TUTBURY. 493

holds there the tenement which was Hugo de Ferrars, for J of
I fee.

Stephen Curzon de Breydsell holds i mess, and 4 a. of land
and wood in Chaddesdon, for J of I fee.

FEODARY OF THE HONOUR OF TUTBURY IN
THE COUNTY OF STAFFORD.

John de Luys holds the Manor of Drakendish, Cambrigge,
and Reghton, and 8 bov. in Strongshulf, for 2 fees.

The Lord de Audeley holds the Manor of Alstronfield for i
fee.

Robert Swineston held | of the same manor for i fee.

Rich holds \ of the same manor for i of i fee.

Robert Gravener and Ricus Poole hold J of the lands of the
same manor, for J of one fee.

Adam Narsdale holds i of the said parts of the same manor,
for I of I.

John de Staff and Wm. Fitz Herbert hold ^ part of the land
of the same manor, for i of i fee.

Henry Vernon holds the Manor of Harlaston for i fee ; the
same holds in Asot and Annesley ^ a carucate for -^ part of a
fee.

Thomas Kynnersley holds the Manor of Lokeysley for J of
I fee.

Thomas Dabye holds in Hoorcroft and 3 donacions for y*^,
^V. and ^ parts of one fee.

John Rolleston holds i mess and virgate of land in Rolleston

for ^V

John Stannley holds Clifton Manor and Hampton for 1 fee.

Hugo Greystock and Botiller hold the Manor of Sondon and
Draycot for I fee ; Greystock holds 2 parts, and Botiller one.

John Thirkill holds the Manor of Knightley in Calengwood
for -^ of I.

Thomas Hastings holds the Manor of Thebbesley for i fee.

Walter Griffith holds the Manor of Wychnore, Tunstall, and
Sircote, for 2 fees.

Wm. Cambury holds the Manor of Falde for ^ fee.

494 THE FEODARV OF TUTBURY.

Thos. Whittington holds i mess and i car of land in Asgar-
desly, for ^ of i fee.

Robt de Lathbury (boghey etc. tock) 90 a. of land near
Stockley, for ^^^ of i fee.

Wm. Jarpynbill holds I mess and 2 car of land in Dreycote
for -^jg of I fee ; the same holds 24 a. of land, formerly Wm.
Chandos, in Merchinton, for ^^^ of i fee.

John Walker holds J messe and i car land in Asst de
Merchinton, for ^ and yV

Henry de Hainbury, I mess and 20 a. of jand in Cotton, and
20 a. of land in Berkesford, for iV ^^^ tV of one fee.

Roger de Wodford, Robert his brother, Will Placegrave, and
Richard Shotton, held i car of land in Mechinton for -ny of i fee.

Thomas Hunt and Robt. held 5 1 a. of land in Mechinton for
-^js of I fee.

Rich Man's holds 16 a. of land, formerly Wm. Forne, in the
same, for ^ part of i.

holds I mess and i car land in Rcddlow, ^V of i.

Walter de Ridware holds i mess and i car of land in Caleng-
wood for Y5 of I fee.

UTOXHATTOR.

Thomas Dethic holds 210 acres of land and mead, in Marsh,
in Utoxeter, and 219 a. land and mead, in Mchinton, for ^j^ of
I fee.

John Yoxhall, i mess and i virg. in Yoxhall, :tV P^irt of i.

The heirs of Stephen Atwich hold i mess and I virg. in the
same, formerly Hugo Baxters, for -j^^ of i fee.

Egid de Meynil held the Manor of Thorpe Constantine for
1 fee.

Thos. Griffith holds the Manor of Bradseal which was Magr.
Henry de Davy's, for -^ part of one fee.

THE COUNTY OF LEICESTER.

Jacobus de Stafford held the Manor of Sheyle for ^ fee.
John de Seagrave held Disworth Manor for ^ fee.
Abb de Merevale and Calkington -^ of i ; Little Sheyle, for
i of I fee ; Magna Sheyle, for ^ of i.

THE FEODARY OF TUTBURV. 49S

RicA Vernon and Magister Edmund Stafford hold the Manors
of Bromcote, Grendon, Shepeye, and Basturley, for 3 fees.

Laurence de Hastings, Manors of Scorpeston, Congeston,
Broghton, and Shirford, for 3 fees.

Edmund Basford, Manor of Swarkeston, J of i fee.

Abbot of Croxden holds Manor of Broghton, ^ fee.

Alexr. Somerville, Manor of Cossington, for ^ fee.

„ „ held Bredon and Erlaston for i^ fees, for-

merly Robert Tattersal, of the Honour of Tutbury.

IN THE COUNTY OF NOTTINGHAM.

Gervase de Clifton held Broughton-in-the-Wold for i fee.

The heirs of Edward Bugg held the Manor of West Leyke
for I fee.

The heirs of John Buttiler held the Manor of East Leyke for
J fee.

The heirs of Wm. de Bingham held the Manor of Bingham
for I fee : fee of Brian de Stapelton.

IN THE COUNTY OF WARWICK.

The heirs of John Clinton held the Manor of Aldestree for
J fee.

496

CHAPTER XXIV.

3naue0t of Imifibta' f eee, &Cf of 10 t>cnx^ VL

(Placed amongst the Subsidy Rolls at the Public Record
Office, numbered 91-59.)

Seven Inquisitions, taken the lOth Henry VL, before. Sir
John Curzon, Peter Pole, Henry de Bothe, and Gerard Meynil,
by virtue of Letters Patent, and a writ directed to them to
ascertain the knights* fees, etc., within the County of Derby,
for the purpose of ascertaining the subsidy for the defence of
the realm, which were held Friday before the feast of St. Hilary.
Writ dated 12th April, 9 H. VI.

No. I.— INQUISITION TAKEN AT CHESTERFIELD
(M. 4). (SATURDAY BEFORE THE FEAST OF
THE NATIVITY.)

John Savage, of Clyston, County Chester, kt, has in demesne
a free tenement in Steynesby, which he holds in socage, worth
40s. 30s. soc in Dore.

John Lynacre, of Mosbro, Coy. Derby, has in Eckington 20s.,
and 40s. soc in Brampton, 30s. soc in Beighton.

Wm. Plumley, of Plumley, Esq., in Plumley 13s. 4d. ; 6s. 8d.
free tenement in Stavely, 6s. 8d. in Hanley.

John Dolfin, of Ekington, has land now in Ekington, ids. od.

Robert Haselhurst, of Spynkhill „ „ 13s. 4d.

John Marescal, of Ekington, gentleman „ 13s. 4d.

John Curzon, of Ketelston, Esq., the Manor of Wingerworth,
for T^ of a fee.

INQUEST OF KNIGHTS' FEES. 497

Rog^er Wyngerworth, of Nottingham, gent., in Wingerworth,

13s. 4d-

Margaret (widow of Nich Longford), of Chesterfield, and
Wm. Babington, of Chilwell, held in Normanton and Pinkeston
^ a fee. In Chesterfield she has 5s., and she held the Manor of
Blackwell for i kt's. fee. Wm. Babington held the same, and
Margaret 26s. 4d. soc in Boythorpe, and 20s. soc in Duckman-
ton ; and the said Margaret and John Busby, of Hogham,
County Lincoln, kt, held 26s. 4d. soc in Morton, and los. soc in
Dronfield ; and with Richard Goushill, of Barlbro, she held the

Manor of Barlbro and Whitwell for half a knight's fee.

■

John Leyke, of Sutton-in-the-Dale, the Manor of Sutton for
half a kt's. fee.

Alesia, Lady of Deincourt, of Caythorpe, County Lincoln,
widow, Holmsfield for J fee. £6 rent in Dronfield from Lord
Cromwell.

Henry Pierpoint, of Holm, Coy. Notts., kt, Thos. Reresby, of
Thryburg, County York, kt., and Wm. Plumley, of Plumley,
half a fee in Ashover.

John Busby, of Hogham, 5s. soc in Ashover.

John Hykling, of Linby, Notts., ids. soc „

Wm. Ulgarthorpe, of Ulgarthorpe, gent., ids. soc in Palterton,
and ^ fee for the Manor of Ulgarthorpe.

Rad Crumwell, of Tatershall, i fee Tybshelf, and i of fee in
the Manor of South Wyngfield ; J in Elmton.

Isabella, widow of Robt Francis, of Fornwerk, 28s. 6d. soc
in Bygging.

Thos. Ascley, of Plesley, and John Leyke, of Sutton, J fee in
Pleslie.

Sir Thos. Rempston, of Bingham, and Thos. Foljambe, of
Walton, Esq., i fee Walton, i fee in Whittington and Brimington.

Wm. Brampton, of Chesterfield, merchant, 40s. soc in Birley.

John Lord Talbot and Henry Grey, of Codnor, and Wm.
Ulgerthorpe, 6s, 8d. soc in Brampton.

William Hardwick, of Hardwick Hall, gent, i fee in Oulcoats.

John Hopton, of Swillington, York, Esq., 26s. 8d. soc in
.Ufton.

Richard Grey de Wilton, Lord Grey of Hereford, \ fee in
Shirland, -i^ in Stretton.

Thos. Chaworth, of Wirton, kt, i fee in Alfreton, i in Norton,

498 INQUEST OF knights' FEES.

40s. soc in Williamsthorpe, 13s. 4d. soc in Aston, 13s. 4d. soc in
Hinkershill.

Thos. Seagrave, of Seagrave, County Leicester, 40s. soc in
Stavely, Woodthorpe.

Wm. Eyre, of Hathersage, gentn., 13s. 4d. soc in Stavely.

Robert Barley, of Barley, gent, yV of fee Manor of Barley.

Margaret Seliok, widow of Seliok, 13s. 4d. soc in Selioke.

Richard Glapwell, of Glapwell, gentn., I3s.4d. soc in Glapwell.

Galf fitz Hugh, of Ravensworth, Esq., i fee in Beighton.

Joha Chernac, of Eccleston, York, widow, 1 3s. 4d. soc in
Whitwell.

John Milton, of Aston, York, kt, and Galf fitz Hugh, of
Ravensworth, ids. soc in WhitwelL

John Alfreton, of Thoresby, Notts., 20s. soc in Whitwell.

John Sewale, of Wirksop, yeoman, los. „

Robt. Birkin, of Birkin, com. Derby, gentn., 6s. 8d. „

John Owthorpe, of Owthorpe, County Notts., gentn., 20s. soc
Oggaston.

Hugo Willoughby, of Risley, gent, 40s. soc Brackenthwait

Henry Kniveton, of Bradly, Esq., 6s. 8d. soc Woodthorpe.

Henry Pole, of Radburn, gentn., and Henry Hose, of Oxton,
Esq., c s. soc Whitington.

Sir Jo. Talbot, of Sheffield, and Thos. Blount, of Barton,
County Derb, 40s. soc Dore.

John Barker, of Dore, gent, 6s. 8d. soc Totingly.

Ralf Bancwell, of Banc well, yeoman, los. soc Witington.

No. 2.— INQUISITION TAKEN AT ASHBOURNE (M. 3).
(THURSDAY BEFORE THE FEAST OF THE
NATIVITY.)

Joha (wo. of Robt Swynborn), of Bancwell, i fee in the

Manor of Bancwell.

Richard Stafford, of Highlow, gentn., los. soc in Bancwell.
Thos. Hublyn, of Bancwell, 20s. „

Richard Bancwell, of Bancwell, yeoman, 1 3s. 4d. „
Thomas Stanley, of Duffield, yeoman, 6s 8d. „
Ralf, Earl of Westmorland, the Manor of Ashford, £4,0.
John Stafford, of Eyom, gentn., c s. soc in Rowland and lOs.

soc in Calnore.

Wm. Plympton, of Kinolton, Nottm., Kt, ;f 14 los. soc in

INQUEST OF KNIGHTS' FEES. 499

Ashford, Derley, Chelmden, Wardlowe, Wormhill, and Tiddes-
well.

Thorn Vernon, of Netherhaddon, c s. soc in Monyash,
Calvorc, and Chelmdon.

Rad Sheladon, of Sheladon, yeoman, 13s. soc in Sheladon.

John White, of Longesdon, yeoman, 6s. 8d. „ Longesdon.

John Columbell, of Stanclyf., 10s. „ Wardlowe.

Rich Sheladon, of Sheladon, yeoman, lOs. „ Monyash.

Richard Vernon, of Netherhadden, Kt, that Manor for I fee,
40s. soc in Basselow.

John Columbel, of Derley, Esq., cs. soc in Derley.

John Columbel, of Stanclyf, 40s. „ „

Wm. Myns, of Roddesley, 40s. „ Overhadden.

John Rollesley, of Rollesley, gentn., 60s. soc in RoUesley and
c s. soc in Yolgreve.

John Bradwall, of Derley, yeoman, 20s. soc in Derley.

John Talbot, of Sheffield, c s. soc in Baslow.
„ „ 60s. „ Bobenhill.

Margaret Rempston, of Byngham, Manor of Beley for J
fee.

Rad Leche, of Willardsly, gentm., 40s. Chatsworth, Litton,
and Calton.

Thos. Foljambe, of Walton, Esq., c s. soc in Pyllesley.

John North, of Bobenhill, yeoman, 20s. soc in Bobinhill.

Wm. Selveyn, of Chattesworth, yeoman, 20s. soc in Chats-
worth.

Step Dyk, of Chelmarden, 2od. soc in Chelmarden.

Thos. fil Henry „ 5s. „ „

Thos. Buckstons, of Buckstons, 1 3s. 4d. soc in Buckstons.

John Stendale, of Stendale, 1 3s. 4d. „ Stendale.

Wm. Hethcote, of Stendale, yeoman, 13s. 4d. soc in Sten-
dale.

John Hopkinson „ „ 13s. 4d.

John Greville, of Cowdale „ 1 3s. 4d. Cowdale.

Robert Blackwell, of Black well, yeoman, 1 3s, 4d. „

John Pole, of Hertington, Esq., 40s. soc in Buckstone, and
13s. 4d. soc in Winster.

Robt. Cotell de Merpul, Esq., Cheshire, 13s, 4d. soc in Buck-
stone.

John^ Cokayne, of Ashbourn, Kt, c s. soc in Herthill.

ft n

W 99

500 INQUEST OF KNIGHTS* FEES.

Robert Gerard, of Red burn, 13s. 4d. soc Redburn.

Nic Gilbert, of Yolgrave, gent, 13s. 4d, soc Yolgrave.

Henry Clark „ yeoman, 13s. 4d. „

Henry Vicar „ „ 13s. 4d. „

Ricus Stendale „ „ 13s. 4d. „

Margaret Longford, of Chesterfield, wo., 1 3s. 4d. soc in Yol-
grave.

Katina Som', of Derley, gentn., 13s. soc in Yolgrave, and
20s. soc in Birchover.

Hugo Meynel, of Winster, gentn., 30s. soc in Winster.

Thos. Foljambe, of Walton, 26s. 8d. „ Stanton Hall.

John Middleton, of Middleton, Kt, ids. „ Gretton.

Hugo Gerard, of Yolgrave, yeoman, 13s. 4d. soc Yolgrave.

Jas de Legh, of Femlegh, gentn., 40s. soc Fernlegh.

Nic, Hyde, of Bowden, yeoman, los. soc in Bowden.

John Hyde „ „ ids.

Ricus Bradbury „ „ 20s.

Christopher Redham, gent, 20s.

Thorn del Clough, Castleton, yeoman, ids. soc in Bowden.

Thomas Bagshaw, of Abbeny „ 20s. „

William Bradshaw, of Bowden „ 6s. 8d. „

Robert Rowarth „ „ 20s. „

Wills Purley, of Purley, Leicester, gentn., los.

Nich Brown, of Bowden, yeoman, 20s. „

Nich Reresby, of Alkmanton, gentn., 40s. Tadington.

John Cot'el, of Tadington, gent, 13s. 4d. soc „

Hugo Greenway, of Green way. Staff., gentn., 13s. 4d. Tad-
ington.

Thomas fil Wm. de Tadington, yeoman, los. Tadington.

Robert Blackwell, of Blackwell, yeoman, 13s. 4d. Tadington.

Roger Wormhill, of Snytton, gentn., 40s. Wormhill.

John Shalcros, of Shalcros, gent, 26s. 8d. „

Henry Grey, of Codner, lOs. in Stok.

Thomas Brightrychfeld, of Brimington, yeoman, 13s. 4d.
Eyam.

Robert Wykursley, of North Lees, yeoman, ids. North Lees.

John Ledom, of Ledom, yeoman, 20s. in Eyam.
. Robt Gregory, of Middleton, yeoman, 13s. 4d. Middleton.

Walter Meynil, of Eyam, gentn., 13s. 4d. Eyam.

John del Hill „ „ 13s. 4d. „

INQUEST OF KNIGHTS' FEES. SOI

Robt Eyre, of Padl^y, Esq., lOOs. in Pad ley.

John Wylde, of Abney, yeoman, 13s. 4d. in Abney.

Thomas Wombwell, of Wombwell, gent, 40s. Eyam.

Robt Skynn, of Hathersage, yeoman, 13s. 4d. Baumfeld.

Thos. Bagshaw, of Abney, 13s. 4d. Abney.

John Talbot, of Sheffield, 50s. Bamfield, cs. in Egham, and
c. s. Middleton.

Rad Longeford, of Longford, and Robt Thorpe, c s., Bamfield.

Hugo Strelly, of Castleton, cs. Castleton.

Sir Ralf Shirley, of RadclifF, 20s. Hope.

Nic Eyre, of Hope, gentn., 40s. „

Wm, Abeney, of Hope, yeoman, 13s. 4d., Hope.

Christopher Redham, of Bowden, gent, 13s. 4d., Castleton.

Wm. Halley, of Hasel, York los. „

Johanna Castleton, of Castleton Wo 20s. Castleton.

Roger Thornhill, of Castleton, yeoman 13s. 4d.

Rich Woodrove, of Castleton, yeoman 13s. 4d,

John Balguy, of Aston, gentn., 13s. 4d. Tideswell, and 40s. in
Aston.

Nich Martin, of Follovve, yeoman, 20d. Castletoa

Wm. Glossop, of Offerton, yeoman, 13s. 4d. Offerton.

Oliver Halley, of Shatton, gentn., 26s. 8d. Shatton.

Robt Coterill, of Merpul, yeoman, 20s. „

Edmund de Ashenhurst, of Ryton, Notts., 13s. 4d. Bradwell.

Thos. Gardyn, of Castleton, yeoman, 20s. in Castleton.

John del Mere de Tideswell los. „

Richard Coke, of Bradwell, 20s. in Bradwell.

Samps Meverel, of Tideswell, kt, ;^8 Tideswell.

Roger Foljambe, of Elton c. s.

Robt Rowers, of Glossop 6s. 8d.

James Cotell, of Tideswell 13s. 4d.

John fil Rich de Stafford, of Tideswell, 6s. 8d. Tideswell.

Martin de Followe, of Tideswell, yeoman, 13s. 4d. „

Thomas Hey man „ „ 13s. 4d. „

Thomas Maldeley „ „ 13s. 4d. „

Robt Swallowe „ „ 6s. 8d. „

Rich Aleyn de Wheston, husbandman, 20s. Weston.

Rich Purslow, of Tideswell, gent, 20s. Tideswell.

John Poynton, of Tideswell, yeoman, 13s. 4d. „

Wm. Blackwell „ „ 1 3s. 4d. „

)9
»

502 INQUEST OF KNIGHTS* FEES.

Richard Longsden, of Longsden, yeoman, 13s. 46. Longsden.

Roger Peke, of Weston „ 1 3s. 4d. „

Henry Knyveton, of Bradley, Esq., los. Monesale.

John Shakeley, of Longsden, gent., 40s. Longsden.

Wm. Hall, of Tideswell, gent, 40s. Tideswell.

Hugo Bronis „ yeoman los.

Rich Lytton, of Lytton los.

Rad Leche, of Wildersley 13s. 4d. „

Thomas Blount, of Barton, kt, 20s. Longsden.

John Cotton, of Ridware, Staffs., 20s. „

Thomas Rempston, of Bingham ^(^4, Litton.

Rich Pilkington, of Glossop, gent, 30s. Glossop.

Wm. Stafford, of Glossop, gent, 30s. Sudvilla.

Robt Mellor, of Glossop, yeoman, 20s. Glossop.

Nich Brown, of Bowden, 20s.

John Rowe, of Glossop, yeoman, 20s.

Robt Stafford, of Eyam, Esq., 40s. Eyam.

Ralf Longford, of Longford, kt, \ fee in Hathersage.

Roger Massey, of Hollowe, gent., 20s. in Eyam.

No. 6.— INQUISITION TAKEN AT DERBY (M. 2).

Simon Repingdon, of Derley, deced., late Abbot of Derley,
;^io in Derby.

Henry Monyash, Abbot of Dale, ids. in Derby.

Wistanus, Prior of Rependon 13s. 4d.

Thos., Prior of Breadsall Park, , 6s. 8d.

Elzabeth Stanley, Prioress of Derby, 20s.

Magr John Mackworth, of Nassington Dean, Lines., 5 m. „
John Andeby, of Andeby, Leics., £4

John Curson, of Ketelston, Esq., 4od.

Thos. Curson, of Bulcote, 6s. 8d.

Thos. de Stok, of Derby, merchant, £4

Rich Statham, of Northampton, gent, £6

Will Keterych, late of Derby, Esq., £$

' John Hikeling, of Lindeby, Notts., Esq., 26s. 8d.
Elizth. de la Pole, of Brailsford, gentlewoman, 10 m.
Robert West, of Marton, husbandman £4

John de Bothe, of Derby, gentn., 40s.

John Prentys, of Lughtburgh, Leics., baker ;^4
Alicia Wychard, of Chadde.sden, gentlewoman, los.

It
»

I

M I

»
99
}|
>»
II
II

INQUEST OF KNIGHTS* FEES. 503

John Sacheverel, of Sniterton, Esq., 3s. 4d. in Derby.

Rich Samon, of Nottm., merch., los.
Rich Kays, of Kilburn, 6s. 8d.

Isabella, wo. of Sir Robt Francis, of Fornwrk, 40s.
Wm. Bate, of Sallow, husbandman, 6s. 8d.

Johanna Faseman, of Coventry, hus-wyf 20s.

Will Rolleston, of Rolleston, Staff., Esq., 4od.

John Yve. Cap. Canter, of Chaddesden, 20s.
which was obtained since last year.

Wm. Lymestre, of Ashburn, Esq., 6s. 8d.

Wm. Lyster, of Litylchester, husbandman, 20s.

Thos. Mackworth, of Mackworth, Esq., 20s.
John Topcliff, of Derby, merchant 2s.

Rad Shore, deceased, late of Derby, merct., 40s.

No. 3.— INQUISITION TAKEN AT CHESTERFIELD

(M. I).

Johanna Holland, of Brun, Countess of Kent, the Manor of
Chesterfield with its members and appurts in the County of
Derby, in socage, worth per annum ;^40.

Thomas Alsop, of Alsop, gent, and William Hardwick, held
in Chesterfield los. ; so did the following : —

Henry Bancwell, of Chesterfield, gent, 26s. 8d.

Roger Dethic, of Hertshorn, gent, 20s. od.

Rob. Bayley, of Bayley, 6s. 8d.

John Barley, of Rolleston, Notts., gent, 20s. od.

John Callal, of Chesterfield, yeoman, Ss. od.

Adam Sawer, of Chesterfield, gentn., 20s. od.

Isabella Lavok, wo., 13s. 4d.

Thomas Hampton, of Blythefield, Staffs., 30s. od.
Robert Whytynton, of Dynsalt, Notts., gent, 40s. od.

John Beton, of Barley, yeoman, Ss. od.

Robt Eyre, of Padley, Esq., 40s. od.

Ankerus Jere, of Derby, yeoman, 6s. 8d.

John Rowley, of Retford, merchant, 20s. od.

Thomas Foljambe, of Walton, gentn., 20s. od.

504 INQUEST OF KNIGHTS' FEES.

No. 4— INQUISITION TAKEN AT REPINGDON (M. 7).
(ON THE FRIDAY BEFORE THE FEAST OF ST.
HILARY.)

William Babington, of Childewell, County Notts., Kt, held
the Manor of Meysham for one fee.

John Lathbury, of Newton Solney, half that Manor for ( fee.

Marg (widow of Nich Langford), of Chesterfield, i of same.

John Stafford, of Bache, coy. Soms., Bishop of Bath, i of same.

Wm. Babington £^ soc in same.

John Dethic, the Manor of Newhall and Stanton for J fee.

John, Duke of Norfolk, the Manors of Bretby, with its
members in Coton, Rolslaxton, and Lynton, for i fee, and in
Rependon -^ of a fee.

Thomas Dyneley, of Cborlton, County Worcester, for | fee in
Rependon.

John Savage, of Bradley, County Chester, Kt, and John de
Bothe, of Derby, soc, i of a fee in Repingdon.

Thos. Rygate, of Masham, yeoman, 6s. 8d. soc Meysham.

John Appleby, of Appleby, County Leicester, Esq., irjFof * f^^
in Meysham, and in Appleby 20s., and the Manor of Chilcote
for j^ fee.

Will de Peke, of Burton, Staff, chapman, holds in Hathcott
6s. 8d.

Thos. Staunton, of Sutton, Notts., los. in Newton Sulney.

RobL Sekington, of Sekington, Coy. Warw., gent., los. in Coton.

Thos. Freeman, of Yakisley, Coy. Leic, 40s. in Repindon.

Alan Moton, of Regtilton, Leic, in right of Margaret his wife,
J of a fee for half the Manor of Smithesby.

Roger Wolley, of Derley, draper, ^ Manor of Hertshorn, for
i fee.

Marmaduke Lumley, of Melburn, Bishop of Carlisle, the Castle
and Manor of Melburn, for i fee.

Isabella, widow of Robt Francis, of Fornwerk, the Manor of
Fornwerk, with its members in Engelby and Stony Stanton,
for i of a fee.

Thomas Cubburley, of Cubburley, Coy. Gloucester, the Manor
of Childcote, for J a fee,

Wm. de Ferrars, of Groby, i Manor of Walton-on-Trent, for
I fee.

i

INQUEST OF KNIGHTS' FEES. 505

Will Horton, of Catton, gentn., two parts of the Manor of
Catton and tenement in Walton, for 2 parts of i fee.

Alice (widow of Roger Hotton), of Catton, gentlewoman, i of
a 3rd pt of the Manor of Catton, for ^ of a knight's fee.

John Curzon, of Croxhall, gent, 2 pts. of the Manor of
Croxhall, for 2 pts. of J a fee.

John Broun, of Shayle, Leic, gent, in right of Alice his wife,
1 of the Manor of Croxall for ^ of half a fee.

John Francis, of Ticknall, Esq., 40s. soc in Ticknall and J
Manor of Stony Stanton, ^ of i fee.

John Abney, of Willesley, Derby, ^ of a fee in Willesley.

John de Bothe held Stretton-super-le-Feld for | knight's fee
and 20s. soc in Swarthingcote.

Thomas Stokes, of Smithesby, 40s. in Pakington and Dones-
thorpe.

Thomas Gresley, of Drakelow, Kt, half the Manor of Gresley
and Lullington, for i of a fee, c. s. soc in Drakelow.

Henry Holland, of Caldwell, Esq., and Robt Awbell, of the
same place, gent., 40s. soc in Caldwell.

No. 5.— INQUISITION TAKEN AT DERBY (M. 6).

Rad Cromwell, of Tatershall, Manor of Crich for i fee.

Manor of West Halum, for J of a fee.

Edmund de la Pole, of York, Esq., 30s. soc, Crich.

Henry Cook, of Ciich, Chief Cantor, there 60s. soc, Crich.
Whetecroft and in mortmain from 20 Ed. I.

Thos. Bradiield, of Mercaston, gent, 20s. in Crich.

John Plumtree, of Nottm., merchant, 20s.

Henry Pierpoint, of Holm, Kt, los.

Rich Walley, of Crich, yeoman, los.

John RoUeston, of Lee, 13s. 4d. in Whetecroft

Thomas Babington, of Dethic, Manor of Dethic, for ^ fee.

Henry Grey, of Codnor, the Castle and Manor of Codnor, i
fee ; the Manor of Heanor, j^ fee ; the Manor of Denby, i fee.

Thos, Lymystre, of Ashburn, Esq., 6s. 8d. soc, Denby.

Robt Strelley, of Strelley, i Manor of Shipley.

Emma Grey, of Landford, widow. Manor of Kirkhalum, \ fee,

and ^ Manor of Sandiacre.
34

506 INQUEST OF KNIGHTS' FEES.

Henry Mackworth, of Mackworth, gent, and John Fraunces,
of Sandiacre, gentn., y of a fee in Stanton juxta Dale.

Wm. Dammes de Stanton, 5s. soc „

Thos. Columbell de Thorpe, Nottm., Esq., 20s. „

Rad Makerel, of Hodeshock, Nottm., Esq., i fee in Bradeston.

Henry Mackworth, of Mackworth, £4 6s. 8d. in Bradeston,
Sandiacre, and Risley.

Nic Smyth, of Bradeston, 20s. in Bradeston.

Agnes Tykhill, of Tutbury, c. s. in Shardlow and Wilne.

John Plasden, of Shardlow, yeoman, 6s. 8d. in Shardlow.

John Stathum, of Morley, Esq., 6s. 8d. in Wilne, and ;^26
Manor of Morley,

Simon Blackfordby, of Ashby, Leicester, gentn., 20s. soc in
Barogh.

Robert Freeman, of Barogh, - 53. in Barogh.

Edward Wright, of „ 6s. 8d. „

Wm. Babington, of Chilwell, Kt., 20s. in WodhalL

John Rolleston, of Swarston, Esq., c. s. in Swarston.

John Hilton, „ gent, 20s. „

Ricus Hussey, of Long Eaton, gent, 40s. Long Eaton.

Richard Samon, of Nottingham, merchant, los.

Thos. Walys, of Long Eaton, los.

John Hussey, „ gentn., 13s. 4d. „

Hugo Tevey, of Stapelford, gent, I3s.4d. Stapleford.

Hugo Wiloughby, of Risley, gent, 13s. 4d. Risley.

Rilf Makerel, of Hodeshok, Notts., Esq., in Willesthorpe.

John Fawnel, of Willesthorpe, gent, 20s. in „

John Balgy, of Thorpe, Leic, Esq., -^ kt fee in Draicot

Margaret Rempston, wo., of Bingham, J Hopwell Manor and

Ockbrook.

«

Nich Findern, of Findern, gent, 40s. in Findern.

John Lathbury,of Egington, Esq., i knight's fee in Eggington.

Henry Booth, of Erleston, Esq., i

Wills Lowenthorpe, of Wednesbury, Staff, i

Will Rolleston, of Rolleston, Staff, gent, 13s. 4d. soc in „

Isabella, widow of Robt Francis of Fornwerk, Kt, 40s. soc in
Quorndon, IDs. in Bulton, ;^io in Alestre.

Hugo Erdeswick, of Souden, Staff, Esq., J part of Manor
Meynel Langley, for J part knight's fee.

Thos. Schardlow of Bulton, gent., 20s. soc in Bulton.

Robt Twyford of Kirklangley, Esq., i fee Manor of Kirklangley.

))
»»

9*

INQUEST OF KNIGHTS' FEES. 507

John Bradborn of Hogh, 23s. 4cl. soc in Hogh.

Thos. Bradshaw of Chelaston, Esq., 20s. soc Chelaston.

Henry Cheshire of Chelaston, husbandman, 13s. 4d., Chelas-
ton.

Wm. Jordan of Ash, husbandman, 13s. 4d. Ash.

Thos. Babington of Dethic, Esq., and Ralf Aune of Frychley,
York, i fee in Manor of Lutchurcb.

Thomas Blount of Barton, i fee Manor of Alwaston, and 20s.
soc. in Duffield.

Robt Vower of Ambaston, husbandman, 13s. 4d. soc in
Alwaston.

John fil Thos. of Thurleston, husbandman, 13s. soc in
Thurleston.

Thomas Parker of London, Esq., 20s. soc in Alwaston.

Robt Smalley of Alwaston, gent., 30s. soc in Alwaston.

John Spenser of Alwaston, yeoman, 13s, 4d. Alwaston.

John Deyne of Newton, husbandman, 2os. Ockbrook.

Thos. Ashby of Lubbesthorpe Lees, Esq., £S Chelaston.

Agnes Tykhill of Tutbury, 5 m. Chelaston, and 40s. soc in
Aston-sup-Trent.

John fil Thomas of Thirleston, husbandman, 13s. 4d. Chelaston,

John Chapman of Chelaston, „ los. Chelaston.

John Aubrey, of Osgarthorpe Leyc, gent, 40s. Weston-sup-
Trent, and 16s. in Weston-sup-Trent

Nich Findern, of Derby, gent, 40s. soc in Findern.

Rich Vernon, of Nether Haddon, kt, 40s. soc in Wilington,
and 4bs. in Alastre.

Gerard Meynil, of Osmondeston, gentn., 60s. soc in Wilington.

Ralf Shirley, of Brailsford, Esq., 6s. 8d. „

Sir Janves Audely, of Monyngton, Hereford, kt., i fee Manor
of Marton.

Rich Fiech, of Marton, husbandman, 13s. 4d. soc Marton.

John Booth, of Derby, gentn., 40d. in Osmondeston.

John Frances, of Tikenhall, Esq., £4 13s. 4d.

John Bradshaw, of Derby, gentn., £^ os. od.
and 26s. 8d. soc in Duffield.

John Francis, of Kirklongley, gent, 6s. 8d.

Robt of the Hall of Osmundeston, husbandman, los.

Nich Dawson, „ los.

William Blowehorn, of Luchchurch, husbandman, 6s. 8d. „*

I)

508 INQUEST OF knights' FEES.

Thos. Powse, of Osmanston, husbandman, 5s. in Osmondeston.

Adam Leper, „ „ los.

John Ruby, of Etewall „ los.

Thomas Dawson, of Osmanston „ is. 8d.

John Hyll, of Makworth, 20s. soc there.

Baldwyn Rugg, of Ashby, Esq., 20s. soc in Mackworth.

Thomas Mackworth, of M., 40s. „

John Wallaton, of Wattenowe, Nottm., gent, 20s. Alastre.

John Sacheverel, of Snitton, Esq., 20s. Aston-upon-Trent,
and IDs. soc in Spondon.

John Statham, of Merley, Esq., 40s. Aston.

Wm. fil Richard, of Aston, yeoman, los. „

Edmund Ferrars, of Birmingham, War., kt., and Will Dethic
de Bredeshal, i fee in the Manor of Breadsal.

Thos. Smally, of Alwaston, gent, 40d. soc in Breadsal.

Thos. Curzon, of Bulcote, 13s. 4d. in Breadsal and ids.
in Chaddesden.

Wm. Plumpton, of Kinolton, Notts., and Thos. Cokefield, of
Chaddesden, Esq., and Thos. Chedul, of Rosyngton, i fee in
Chaddesden, ^ fee in Lokhawe.

Emma Tutbury, of Chaddesden, ids. soc in

Alicia Wychard, „ los. „

Robert Smalley, of Alwaston, gent, 4od. „

Robert Twyford, of Langley, gent, ^ of 3, fee in Spondon.

John Mevril, of Lichfield, Esq., 26s. 8d. soc in

Gilbert Kays, of Spondon, yeoman, 13s. 4d.

Henry Mackworth, of Mackworth, .20s.

Galfry Kniveton, of Bradley, gent, 13s. 4d,

Hugo Morteyn, of Mapley, „ 40s. Maperly.

Robert Strelly, of Strelly, „ 20s. „

Wm. Plumpton, of Kinalton, kt, 6 pts. of i fee Lockaw.

Robt Irland, of Yeldersley, Esq., 26s. 8d. soc „

Ingram Frances, of Horsley, gent, 6s. 8d. soc in Horsley.

Rich Kays, of Kilborn, gent, 6s. 8d. „ „ and

20s. in Kilborn and Wodhowe.

Thos. Wathowe, of Duffield, gentn., los. soc in Duffield.

Hy. Bradshaw, of Wynley, Esq., 20s.

Rich. Prynce, „ gent, 26s. 8d.

>9

ft
tf
n

INQUEST OF KNIGHTS FEES. 509

No. 3.— INQUISITION TAKEN AT DERBY (M. 5.)

George Cokayne, of Mapelton, gent, 20s. in Mapelton.

Sir John Cokayne, of Ashbourn, kt., c s. in Parwich, and c s.
in Baiidon, c. s. in Ashbourn, jC6 in Clifton, J fee in Manor of
Middleton, 40s. in Thorpe, and i Manor of Lessington, for i of
a fee.

Thomas Knyveton, of Mercaston, Esq., 40s. soc in Ashbourn.

Richard Welbec, of Compden, gent, 26s. 8d. „

Thos. Lymystre, of Compden, los. Clifton.

Alice Hunt, of Mapelton, gentn., 20s. soc Mapelton.

John Pole, of Hertington, Esq., 20s. soc in Hertington, and
6s. 8d. soc in Lee.

Wm. Plumpton, of Kinalton, £3 in Hertington.

John Holland, of Wirksworth, gent, 30s. soc in Wirksworth.

John Bremington, of Wednesley, gent, c. s. in Wednesley.

Rad Leche, of Crumford, gent., c. s. in Cromford.

Nic Gilbert, of Yolgreve, gent, 20s. in Middleton.

John Bagot, of Blysfield, Staff, kt, 20s. in Smershill.

John Talbot, late of Stafford, j£j in Brassington.

Hugo Eyre, of Hoknaston, gent, 20s. in Hoknaston.

Roger Hawe, of Elton, gentn., in right of Cecilia, his wife>
half the Manor of Elton for half a fee.

John Holland, of Thorpe, Watty vi lie, Northampton, 20s. in
Alderwaslce.

Thomas Blount, late of Barton, Manor of Barton i fee, 20s.
soc in Holland, 20s. soc in Sudbury.

John Byron, of Clayton, Lancaster, 40s. soc in Ashleyhay in
Wirksworth.

Thos. Babington, of Oxton, ^ Manor of Dethic, J fee.

Robt. Kenesley, of Loxley, Staffs., gent, 20s. soc in Lee.

John Rolleston, of Lee, los. „

Henry Kniveton, of Bradley, the Manor* of Bradley, | fee ;
c. s. soc in Kniveton, and 40s. in Underwood.

Thos. Kniveton, 15s. soc in Kniveton, and jC4 in Under-
wood.

Thos. Kniveton, of Mercaston, Esq., Manor of Mercaston,
for I fee.

John Bradburn de Hogh, J ; Manor of Bradburji | part
of I fee.

5IO INQUEST OF KNIGHTS* FEES.

Thos. Alsop, of Alsop, gent , in 40s. soc in Alsop.

John Gelle, of Hopton, yeoman, 30s. soc in Hopton.

Peter Brugg, of Bentley, yeoman, 20s. in Bentley.

John Statham, of Morley, ^ Manor of Callow ;^io.

Wm. Statham, of London, Esq., 20s. soc in Snelston.

Nic Fitzherbert, of Norbury, Esq., Manor of Norbury ^8 ;
20s. in Osmaston.

Joha. (Widow of John Fitzherbert), of Rossington, 13s. soc in
Rossington.

Thos. Wright, of Rossington, husbandman, 13s. 4d. in Ross-
ington.

John Coton, of Redware Hamstall, Staffs., Esq., 20s. soc in
Rossington.

John Coton and John Saparton, of London, gentn.. Manor of
Breydeston, for ^ a fee.

John Curzon, of Ketelston, J of a fee in Ketelston ; Manor of
Weston Underwood ^^13 ; and j£S in Hungry Bentley.

John Hilton, of Foston, gent, 20s. soc Weston Underwood.

John Fitzherbert, of Somsale, gent., I knight's fee in Somer-
sale, 20s. in Weston Underwood.

John Irton, of Irton, j£6 in Irtori.

Thos. Bradfield, of Mercaston, gent., £i Mercaston, and 20s.
Wyaston.

Nich Montgomery, of Cubley, kt, ^Cs Snelston, and 20s.
Sudbury.

Robert Hill, of Hounhill, Staffs., gentn., 20s. in Snelston.

Thos. Okeover, of Okeover, Staffs., Esq., J fee in Snelston,
i in Atlow.

John, son and heir of Nicklas Rerisby, of Alkmanton, gent,
i the Manor of Alkmanton for J fee.

John Bonnington, of Barrowcote, Esq., J of a fee in Etewall,
Burnaston, and Barrowcote.

Wm. Bakepuz, df London, i fee in Etewall, Burnaston, and
Barrowcote.

John Reibof, of Etewall, husbandman, 30s. in Etewall.

John Francis, of Tickenhall, Esq., 20s. soc in Normanton.

Wm. Wylne, of Melburne, yeoman, 13s. 4d. „

Robt Irland, of Yeldersley, Esq., Manor of Yeldersley, J fee.

Wm. Myners, of Rogisley, Esq., in right of Johanna, his wife
;^4 in Rogisley, and 30s. in Wyaston.

INQUEST OF KNIGHTS' FEES. $11

Thos. Lymystre, of Compden, gentn., in right of Johanna, his
wife, J fee in Rogisley.

Gerard Meynil, of Osmondeston, gent, 6s. 8d. in Rogisley,
20S. in Yeveley.

Robert Cokefield, of Chaddesden, gent, los. Kirkbroughton.

Hy. Booth, of Erleston, Esq., Manor of Sydenfen, for J fee.

John Rolleston, of Swercheston, gent, and Thos. Staunton, of
Sutton-in-Donington, i fee in Horlton.

Rad Langford, of Langford, kt. Manor of Langford, for i fee.

Peter de la Pole, of Rodburn, gent, Manor of Rodburn, i
Manor of Mogington, i Manor of Egington for i fee.

Will Rolleston, of Rolleston, Staffs., Esq., | Manor of Moging-
ton, i fee.

Henry Milner, of Hatton, yeoman, c s. in Hatton.

Richard Piper, of Repton, Tailor, and Thos. Cook, of
Trusley, yeoman, i fee in Trusley.

Thomas Blount, Manor of Sutton, i fee.

Rad Shirley, of Brailsford, Esq., Manor of Brailsford, for i fee.

Will Montgomery, of Coland, Esq., 20s. soc in Coland.

John Holland, kt, Manor of Dalbury Lees, for i fee.

Rad Twyford, of Langley, gentn.. Manor of Tyurveston, for
I fee.

Robt Staunton, of Kirklangley, gent, ^ fee in Oslaston.

Rad Shirley, of Radcliff, sup Sore, J fee in Yveley ; Manor of
Shirley for i fee ; Manor of Hove i fee ; 40s. in Holyngton.

Henry Bothe, Manor of Erleston, for £6 13s. 46,

Agnes Tickill, of Tutbury, 8s. 8d. in Merston.

Thomas Mackworth, Manor of Ashe, for 3 parts of i fee.

John Crewker, of Twiford, gent, £4 13s. 4d. in Twiford.

John Ward, of Steyneston, husbandman, 13s. 4d. in Steyneston.

Walter Cocksay, of Burton, the Manors of Eyton and
S^geshale for i fee.

The End of Volume I.

513

INDEX OF PERSONS.

EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS.

M. = Manor. (Certif.), Shows that the person is mentioned in the Certificate
of Knights' Fees (date uncertain). D., Domesday. T. de N., Testa de Nevil.
B. of A., Book of Aids. (R. B.), The Red Book and Liber Niger. P., Pipe
Rolls. (H.), King Henry. (R.), King Richard the ist. (J.), King John.
(E.), King Edward. (W.), King William.

Aaron the Jew, 32 H. 2, 132

M 3 H. 3, 134
Abbctot, Wm., 5 J., 158
Abbe, Rich le (14 H. II.) no;

(6 J.) 164; (7 J.) 171; (13

J.) 178
Abbe, Nich (13 H. III.) 198;

(16 H. III.) 202; (30 H.

III.) 214 ifis. ; (38 H. III.)

222 ; (43 H. III.) 225 ; (7

£. I.) 241 ; (15 £. I.) 247
Abel, Robert, 29 E. i, 258

Margaret, his wife
Aburnam, Jo. (38 H, III.) 221 ;

(48 H. III.) 232
Avelina, his wife, id.
Acastra, Robt., 22 H. 3, 209
Achard, Rich., 55 II. 3, 237

„ Agnes, „

Acton, Jo., 23 H. 3, 209
Acour, Galfr, 14 J., 296

„ Hugo (6 J.) 162 ; (7 J.)

168.9; (8 J.) 172; (7E. I.)

241
Acour, Robert (10 H. III.) 194;

(21 H. ni.) 418; (6 E. I.)

250 ; (26 E. I.) 254
Acour, John fil Robert, 19 £. I,

251 dis.
Adam, 17 J., 182
Adwalton, Norman, 28 H. 2,

128
iElgar, 42, 66

i^LVEVA, COUNTESS, 69

iElfric, 34

iCluric, 38 (see Aluric)

Aer, Alice, widow of John of

Chester, 10 R., 145
Agard, Arthur, 13, 475
Ailwyn, Wm., 13 E. i, 246
Ake, 31 H. 2, 132
ALAN, EARL, 36

,, Castellan, 26 H. 2, 1 25
Alain, Oliver fil (Savigne), c. H.

2, 297-9
Mary, his wife

Alastre, Wm. fil. Rich, 55 H.

3. 237

Albemara, Gilbt, 24 H. 2, 123

Albelot, Hugh, 34 H. 2, 135
ALBINI, ALBYN, ABNEY,

DAUBINI—
Abney, 87, 281, 308
Albini, 87
Albyn, Adam, Chesterfield, (11

E. IL) 452 ; (32 E. I.) 261
Albini, Amicia, c. John, 290
„ Avic, 7 J., 168
„ Elias, 315
„ Godfr (9 R. I.) 328; (6
J.) 162-5
Albini, Henry (1107) 281

„ Hugo, 21 H. 3,417
Abney, Jo., Willesly, 10 H. 6,

505
Aubini, John. 32 H. 3, 216

Albini, Nigel, (W. i) 296; (i 1 12)

326
Albeneye, Passe (14 H. III.)

199 ; (19 H. III.) 206.
Albini, Philip, 17 H. 3, 204
„ Ralf, 23 H. 2, 121
„ Robert (Certif, ) 308, (32
H. II.) 282; (14 J.) 179; (16
J.) 180; (3 H. in.) 184
Albini, Robert, of Walesby, 313
Almey, Robert, 2 J., 149
Albini, Roger, c W. i, 296 ; D.,

332
Abney, Wm., Hope, 10 H. 6,

501
All)ini, Wm., heirs of (30 H.

III.) 214 dis.; (7 E. I.) 241 ;

(15 E. I.) 247 ; Oscinion (8 R.

L) 363; ("98)383; (5 J-)
158; (8 J.) 171; (13 J.) 178;
(14 J.) 402; (15 J.) 145; (16
J.) 182; (2H. HL) 405? (3
H. IH.) 183-5; (8 H. IIL)
191-2; (13 H. Ill ) 198; (14
H. IIL) 200; (16 H. IIL)
202 ; (21 H. III.) 412-77-99 ;
(27H.nL)442; (35 H. IIL)
220; (43 H. IIL) 228; Wm.
of Bel voir, 318

Maud St. Liz, his wife, fV/.

Albertus (Certif.) 320

Albres, Thos. fil Ralf, il E. 2,
44^

35

514

Alcher, 40, (ler) 41, 43 his

„ G. fil Wm., c. H. 2, 290

»>

Wm. fil, id,
Alden, 43, 67
Aldene, 52

AWeleigh, Nic, 18 E. I, 250
Aldeworde, Wm., 14 H. 3, 201
Aldlacketon, Wm., 22 H. 3, 208
Aldred, Hugo, 22 H. 2, 119
Aldredisle Wm. (4 E. I.) 239,

Worksop; (10 E. I.) 244;

(15 E. I) 248
Aldithley, Jacob, 44 H. 3, 230
Aldetheleu, Nic, Tissington, 33

E. I, 262
Aldewerke, John, 12 E. i, 24$
„ Robert, fil Robert

35 »

Aldewerke, Robert, 13 H. 3,

196
Aldbworth, Robert, 21 H. 3,

415
Aldwic, Richard, 4 J., 154

Alwoldiston, Isabella, 348

Aldworth, Wm. (19 H. III.)

206; (28 H. III.) 212
Aldesworth, Robert, fil Adam,

7 E, I, 241
Alegate, Abbot, 11 E. 2, 456
Alers, Thos., 11 E. 2, 454
Alewis, Robt., ii E. 4, 453
ALFRETON, HONOUR OF,

446
ALFRETON, ROBT., 21 H.

3, 419
Alfreton, Galf, cap. , 9 H. 3, 193

John, 10 H. 6, 498

Robt. fil Ran, 333

Robt. the miller, id,

Robt. fil Wm. (6 H.

III.) 189; (8H. III.) 192

Alfreton, Roger, 9 H. 3, 193

,, Thomas fil Robt. 26

H. 3, 211

Alfreton, Wm., 39 H. 3, 223

Alex, Clicus, 3 J., 152

Alford, Rich.; 29 H. 3, 213

Algar, 34, 69

„ Earl, 28, 29, 32

Alibon, Hugo, 24 E. i, 253

,, Alice, sister of Agnes,

32 H. 3, 216

Alkmanton, 285

Almar, Robert, 16 J,. 182

Almaric, 49, 50

„ Robt., 3 H. 3, 185

Almelon, Robt , 53 H. 3, 235

Wimarc, his wife

Alnei, Hugh, 4 J., 156

Alneto, Hugo, 5 J., 159

„ Roger (2 J.) 149; (12

J.) 176-7; (18 E. 1)250

Alno, Alexr., H. 2, 277

Hugo, his brother

Alnton, Herbert, 32 II. 2, 133

1}

>>

»»

INDEX OF PERSONS.

(Alport qy.) le Port Augustine,

33 H. 3, 217
Alreton, Wm. (parson) ii J.,

175
Alric, 41

Alsi, 45

Alsop, Thos., lo H. 6, 503-10

,, Wm , 12 E. I, 245

Atteput, John, 55 H. 3, 237

Alveley, Robert, 16 H. 3, 203

Aveley, Robert, 13 J., 179

Alun, 67

Aluric, 39, see Aeluric (ter), 42,

50
Aluricus, II

Alwastesfiea, Rich, fil Robt., 29

H. 2, 129
Aluuold, 61

Alvers, Robert, 22 H. 2, 119
Alwin, 39

Amaur, Robt., 8 H. 3, 192
Amundeville, Elins, 10 H. 3,

194
Amundeville, Joscelin, 26 II. 2,

125
Amundeville, Nigel, 34 H. 3,

219
Amundeville, Robt., 39 H. 3,

223
Ancia, Gerard, II J., 174
And^^av, Geoff (16 J.) 180;

Godfrey (16 J.) 181 ; (5

H. III.) 188
Andevil, Rad., 6 J., 165
Andrew, Canun, 31 H. 2, 131
Andrew, Cap. Bingham, 29 £. I,

259
Annesley (Aneslea), Gilbert, 28

H. 2, 128
Anesley, John (14 H. III.) 199 ;

(14-18 E. I.) 246, sheriff; (25

E. I.) 254; (26 E. I.) id, .
Anesley, John (certif.) 354;

(1161)342; (22 H. II.) 119;

(31 H. II.) 131 ; (21 H. III.)

416-23; (25 H. III.) 210;

(27 H. III.) 439-48
Anesley, Walter, 11 E. 2, 453

„ Wm.,36 H. 3, 220
Anesy, Mathew (1272) 303

„ Peter, Margy, widow of

(1272)303
Anestan, Rich. (Beston), 21

H. 3, 420
Anesty, Walter, 33 E. i, 261
Anketil, Wm., 4 J., 154

„ Thos. fil, 34 H. 3, 218
Anselin, see Hanselih
Aunselin, Thos., 18 H. 3, 206
Anselin, Geoffry, 25, 40

„ Jo. (Barton), 25 H. 3,

216
Anselin, John, 28 H. 3, 212

., Wm. (certif.), 313
Anst, Clic, c. H. 2, 289

Anne wick, Thom, 40 H. 3,

224
Appleby, John (10 H. III.) 504 ;

Robt. (14 J.) 296; (31 E. I.)

259
Appleby, Wm., 4 E. I, 238
Applesthorpe, Rich, 43 H. 3,

227
Apetot, Jord. fitz Wm., 10 H.

3, 194
Aquila, Rich., c. H. 2, 276

Arch, the wife of Thomas

(certif.), 335

ARCHBISHOP HUBERT,24,

33.90,9'. 268-431
Archbishop of York (14 J.)

396-7; (21 H. III.) 417
Archebaud, Rubt., 4 E. I,

238
Archer, Rich fil Rich, 34 E. i,

262
Archer^ Robert ( 14 H. III.) 200 ;

(43 H. III.) 227; (14 E. I.)

246
Archer, Thom., 53 H. 3, 235
„ Will (Offerton), 33 E. I,

261
Arcur, see Archer

„ Robert fil Henry, 32 H.

3, 216
Arches, Gerbert, 22 H. 2, 119,

335
Arches, Gilb., (4 J.) 154-5-6; (5

J.)i6o;(6J.)i66;(9j.)i73;

(II J.) 175
Arches, Gilbert fil Gilbert, 28

H. 2, 128
Arches, Havis (27 H. II.) 127 ;

(31 H. II.) 131
Arches, Havice ux Gilbert, 25

H. 2, 124
Arches, Henry, 29 H. 2, 129

„ Thos., 33 H. 3, 217
Arcy, Roger, 9 E. i, 242
Ard, Hugo, 329 ^is,
Ardene, Simon, 1 1 E. 2, 454
Arderne, Galf, I E. I, 237
Argentan, Wm., 14 J., 179
Armiger, Tom (8 J.) 172 ; (ri

J.) 175
Arneburg, Rich., 31 E. i, 260

Arnhal, Hy., 19 H. 3, 206
,, Rad, Sheriff of Line,
18 E. I, 250
Arnhal, Reginald, 14 J., 296
,, Rich., 15 H. 2, III
„ Stephen, 4«£. i, 238
„ Wm., 4 H. 3, 187
,, Wm. fil Martin, 35
H. 3, 219
Arnhal, Wm. fil Nic, 48 H. 3,

233
Arnhal, Wm. fil Osbert, 17 H.

3» 204
Artheyk, Robt., 349

INDEX OF PERSONS.

515

ARUNDEL, EARLS OF, 82-4;

(Barony) 441, 21 H. 3, 418
Arundel, Roger, 9 R. I, 367

„ Roger, 2 J., 148
Arcley, Thos., 10 H. 6, 497
Ascam, Jo., 25 E. 3, 316
Ascelinus, Geoffrry, 305 bis,
Ascelin, Magr. (Archdeacon), 8

J., 172
Ascelin, GeofTrey, 16, 48, 54,

68,96
Ascelin, John, 29 H. 3, 213

„ Wm., D., 358
Ash, 306
Ashbourn, Magr. Andrew, (24

E. L) 253 ; (25 E. L) 254
Ashby, Thos,, 10 H. 6, 507
Ashenhurst, Edmund, 10 H. 6,

501
Ashford, Griffin, 41 H. 3, 226
„ Margt., 21 H. 3, 413
Asbover, Gair(io H.III.) 195 ;

(16 H. IIL) 203
Aslackaby, Rich., 392
Aslacton, Remaldus 12 H. 2,

108
Aslakeston, Robert, 31 H. 2,

131

Aslacton, Robt. fil Waltr, 25

E. I, 254
Aslaclon, Simon, sherift, 44 H.

3, 229
Aslacton, Wm. . 27 H. 3, 438
Astcari, Wm., 5 H. 2, 106
Astin, Alice, wo., of Derby, 19

H. 3, 206
Astwich, Stephen, 6 H. 6, 403
Aswardby, Rich., (27 H. IIL)

429; (34 H. in.) 218
Auburn, Wm., i E. i, 238
Aubrey, John, 10 H. 6, 507
AUDELEY, THE LORD, 6

H. 6, 493
Audeley, Jas., (31 H, III.) 287 ;

(10 H, VI.) 507
Audeley, John, 10 H. 6, 502
Audley, Maurice, 3 H. 3, 184

„ Wm., 27 H. 3, 442 bis,
Averanches, Robt., and Maiilde

Avenel, 297
AVENEL FAM., 293
Avenel de Biarz, W. 1, 296

„ of Haddon, 293 (i 102)

„ Emma (Vernon) 297

„ Gervase (2 H. II.) loi,

294; (19 H. IL) 115, 295;

(23 H. n.) 121 ; (26 H. II.)

126, 29s
Avenel, Gilb., 294 ; Amicia, his

wife, 6 R. I, 295
Avenel, Hervy(idSo), Mont St.

Michael) 297
Avenel, Hugh fil Wm. (1082),

297
Avenel, Ysabel, 16 J., 181

Avenel, Matilde ux Robt. Ave-
ranches, 297

Avenel, Nich fil Wm. (Biarz,
1158)297

Avenel, Oliver fil Oliver, H. 2,
297; fil Wm., (Biarz, 11 58)
297 ; (ti228)

Petronilla, his wife

Avenel, Ralf, Coutances (iioo)
293-7 ; Pasbray(c. H. II.) 297 ;
(loiSo, Mont St. Michael) 297 ;
(Mortain. 1082); brother of
Wm. (1082) 297; fil Wm.
( 1082) 297 ; Ranulf fil Ranulf
(Sartiliy, 1 105) 297

Avenel, Richard fil Wm. (1082)
297; (1 126) /y., 298 Otelon;
fil Rich (Monteburg) 297

Avenel, Robt. (c. Step.) 293 ;
(H. n.)294; (19 H. II) 115,
116, 295 ; (23 H. II.); id.
(7 R. I.) 295. 301 ; Savigni
(H. II.) 297; fil Wm. (1082)
297

Avenel, Roland fil Wm (Biarzs,
U58) 297

Avenel, Wm. (Biars, 1082) 296 ;
(1 156) 296; (Senescal, Earl
Mortain, 1121) 297; (1113)
293;(1I. II.)294;(29H.n.)
(Iii8);(3j.)295; (5 J.) 158;
(3 H. HI.) 185; (8 H. IH.)
191 ; fil Rich, Monteburg,
297 ; fil Wm. (1082) 297

Atiewro, Thos., Rolieston, 13
E. I, 246

Atty, Henry, 9 E. i, 243

Augustine, le Port, 33 H. 3, 217

Auic, 41 bis, 42

Ailiet, 45, see Uluet

AUGE, THE COUNTESS
(see Ewe)

Aulum, Wm., 10 H. 3, 194

Aumaury, Robert, 16 H. 3, 202

Aumar, Robt., 14 H. 3, 200

Aumarle, Galf, 11 E. 2, 453

Aumary, Robt., 13 H. 3, 198

Aumbly,John, 11 E. 2, 453

Aung, Wm., Nottm., 43 H. 3,
227

Aurefaber, Philip, 29 H. 2, 129

Ausicar, Wm., 8 H. 2, 106

Auti, 66

A u vers, Robert, I J., 146

Ayleston, Jo. fil Wm., 43 H. 3,
226

Ayvil, John, 8 J., 172

Azelin, D., 54, 55, 305

Azor, 12 H. 2, 108

Baalega (Barley), Robt., 22 II.
2, 119

Baaltre, Rad, 11 J., 175

Baard, Galf, 367

Babington, Hugh (12 E. I.) 245 ;

(13E. L)246; (25E.L)254;

(26 E. I.) 254
Babington, Thos. (6 H. VI.)

485-6; (10 H. VL) 507 (of

Oxton) ; (10 H. VI.) 509
Babington, Wm., 10 H. 6, 496,

504-6
Bachard (Bussard), John, 21 H.

3»42o
Bacheler, Walter, 4 V. I., 239
Bacun, Wm., 11 J., 175

„ Wm. (Basford), 14 H. 3,

199
Bada, 64, 65
Badelsmere, Sir Wm., 6 H. 3,

189
Bad vet, Rog, 8 R. I, 367
Bager, Hugh. 39 H. 3, 223
Baggale, Thos., 20 E. 3, 477
Bagot, Milesant, wo. of Hervy,

16 J., 181
Bagot» John, 10 H. 6, 509
Bagshaw, Thomas, 10 H. 6,

500
Bailliol, Hy. (R. I.) 387 ; (14 J.)

402 ; (4 H. III.) 186
Bailliol, Ingelram (Foston) (28

E. I.) 258; (II E. n.)455
Bailliol, John (sheriff) 44 H. 3,

230
Bailliol, Wm., 20 E. 3, 475
Baillios, Wm. (30 E. I.) 472 ;

(20 E. in.) 475
Bak, John, H. 2, 289

„ G., H. 2, 289
Bakcborn, John, 6 H. 6, 490
Bakepuz, (ialf (21 H. IH.) 417-

24; (27 H. IH.) 444-6; (30

H. IlL)2i5; (T. deN.)285

(1138) ; and Eincinia, his

wife (33 H. IH.) 286
Bakepuz, Hy., 5 E. I, 240
„ Jas., 6 H. 6, 286
„ John (20 H. I H.) 475;

(23 H. II.) 122; (27 H. HI.)

445; (3oE.L)472;(T.deN.)

285; (6H.VL)286; fil John

(B. of A.) 285(1167); (20 E.

HI.) 486
Bakepuz, John fil John (20 E.

II.) 475
Bakepuz, Ralf D., 285 ; (14 J.)

296; (30 E.) 472-5; (E. I)

286
Bakepuz, Robt (cert.) 285 (1197),

286
Bakepuz, Thos., 25 E. 3, 286

Walter (1167) 123-5 ;

(23 H. H.) 122 ; (38 H. IH.)

221 ; (39 H. HI.) 224; (55

IL IH.) 236

Elizabeth, his wife

Si6

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Bakepuz, Wm. (lo H. VI.) 286 ;

(lo H. VI.) 510
Balderton, Hugh, 21 H. 2, 118
Baldricus, 31 H. i» 95
Baldwin, 31 H. 2, 131
Baltrgi, Wm., 9 J., 173
Balgy, John, 10 H. 6, 501-6
Balge, Robt (junr.) 28 £. I,

258
BalioI,John, 53 H. 3,234
Bampton, Magr Paulinus, 48 H.

3.233
Baumpton, John fil Reinfred, 4

Banc well = Bakewell —

Bancwell, Hy. (23 II. II.) 122 ;

(10 H. VI.) 503
Bancwell, Hy. til Math , 50 H.

3. 234
Bancwell, Math., 50 H. 3, 234

Rair, 10 H. 6, 498

Rich, 10 H. 6, 498

Rich fil Wm.,37H.

3. 221
Bancwell, Wm., 35 H. 3, 220
Ban ton, Pauline, 26 H. 3, 212
Barba, Rich, I2 J., 177
Barberel, Nic, 1 2 J., 176
Barbesle, Wm. de, 2 J., 148
Barbot, Thus. (21 H. HI.) 419-

21 ; (43 H. III.) 226
Bardeslaw, Rich, 10 H. 3, 195
BARDOLF, BARONY OF,

440
Bardolf, Doun (10 R.) 145 ; (3

J.) 154; (4 J.) 155; (5 J.)
160; (6 J.) 155; (13 J.) 178;

('4 J.) 403; ('5J-)H7
Bardolf, Heirs of Doun (16 J.)

182; (3H. HI.) 184

Bardolf, Hy., 3 J., 154
Uxor Philip de Derbi.

Bardolf, Hugh (sheriff) (8 H.
II.) 106; (15 H. II.) Ill ;
(22H. n.)ll9;(6R. I.) 136 J
(2 J.) 147: 3 J., 154; (4
Jo.) 184; (5 J.) 157; (6 J..
162 ; (30 E. I.) 470 ; (20 E)
III.) 475-85 (junr) ; (20 E
III.) 47S ; (6 H. VI.) 481

Bardolf, J., 27 H. 3,432
Nic, 13 J.. 177
„ Robt (14 J.) 398; (21
E. I.) 251 ; (19 E. I.) 251
Lora, his wife.

Bardolf, Wm. (8 II. III.) 190-2 ;
(13 H. III.) 199; (14 H. III.)
200; (i; H. III.) 102; (21
(H. HI.) 417-8-21-59; (30
H. III.) 214 ^m; (38 H. III.)
222; (7E. I.) 241 ; (15 E. I.)
247; (30 E. I.) 472; (II E.
II.) 452

Bardolf, Wm. fil Wm. (Stoke),
5 E. I, 240

Bardolf, Thos.,(i8 H. II.) 114;
(33 H. II.) 134; (34 H. II.)
135; (40 H. III.) 224; (30

E. I.) 472; (4 E. II.) 465;
(20 E. III.) 475; (H. 6)308
Baiewe, Wm., 34 H. 3, 217
Barenton, Robt, 44 H. 3, 230
Barker, Wm., 37 H. 3, 221
Harlburc, Roger, 5 J., 107
Barley, John, 10 H. 6, 503 (of

Rolleston) /</.
Barley, Nic, 26 H. 2, 125
Hardolf, iV.
„ Johanna, wo. of Thos.,
20 H. 3, 207
Barley, Robert (13 H. IV.) 483 ;
(loH. VI.) 498 (of Barley);
(10 H. VI.) 503
Barlega, Tom, 28 H. 2, 119
Barnebi, Malger, 28 H. 2, 128
„ Rich, I E. I, 238
„ Walter fil Robert, 35
H. 3, 220
Bar, Com de, I J., 146
BARRE, BARRI, BARRY,

BARET, BARRETT—
Barri, Galf (certif.), 353 ; (12
H. III.) 411 ; (21 H. III.)
417 ^w, 424; (33 H. III.) 217
Barre, Gerard, 3 H. 3, 183
Barry, Godfr, 15 H. 3, 201
Goisfred D., 353
Henry. 5 J. 383
John (30 H. III.) 220;
(40 H. III.) 224; (10 H.

VI.) 498
Barre, Nigel, 34 H. 3, 218

„ Rad, 343 ; (31 H. I.) 95 ;

(H.I.) 353; (6 J.) 163; (7

J.) 171; (1 E. I.) 238; (12

E. I.) 245.
Barret, Rd., 15 H. 2, iii

„ Rich, 25 H. 2, 124

„ Robt (12 H. II.) 108;

(27 H. III.) 437
Barri, Robt. le de Bligh, 2 J., 149

Barry, Stephen, 17 E. I, 249
Thos., parson of Ty versholt, id,

Barre, Tom, 9 H. 3, 193
„ Wm. (20 H. II.) 116; (I
E. I.) 237 ; (22 H. III.) 460 ;

(27 H. HI.) 437
Barri, Wm., 5 E. I, 240

„ Wm. fil Ralf, 7 E, I, 241
Barons, Fossiers of Normandy,

270
Barrington, Rich, 7 E. I, 241
Bars, Nigel, 27 H. 3, 427
Barth, Rich, 40 H. 3, 225
Bartholomew, of Nottm., 23 H.

2, 121
Barton, Beatrix (48 H. III.) 32 ;

—Hawkins (13 H. IV.) 483;

-Rich (33 H. II.) 133;-

Robt. (Certif.) 357

If

»f

»)

Barun, Math, 33 H. 2, 134
Basache, Hugh, 27 H. 3, 440
Basings, John, 30 E. i, 259
Basingfield, Wm., 53 H. 3, 235
Baskerville, Hy. (certif.) 286

John, his son
Baskerville, John, 1266, 286
Basset, Elizabeth, wo. of Simony

7 J., 169
Basset, Galf, 22 H. 2, 119
„ John, 20 E. 3, 477
,, Isabella, wo. of Simon,

12 J., 176
Basset, Matilde (de Caus) fil

Ralf, 33 H. 3, 325
Basset, Peter, 43 11. 3, 227
„ Hugo, 43 H. 3, 227
„ Ralf, (31 H. I.) 94; (8

H. II.) io6; (1198) 357; (12

J.) 177; (16 J.) 181; (27

H. III.) 439-47; (I E. I.)

238; (30 E. I.) 470.
Basset, Ralf fil Ralf

„ heirs of Ralf, 20 E. 3,

476
Basset, Ralf, Draiton, 333 ; (17

H. III.) 204; (41 H. III.)

225
Basset, Ralf, Sapcote, 21 £ I,

252
Basset, Ralf fil Wm., Bolsover,

18 H. 3, 205
Basset, Reginald (c. John) 296 ;

(4H. III.) 187; (21 H. III.)

413
BASSET, RICHD., C. J. of

England, 352; (31 H. I.)95;

(1198)387; (6J.)i65;(7j.)

170; (21 H. III.) 421
Basset, Robt. (16 J.) 181 ; (32

H. 216); (41 H. III.) 226;

(30 E. I.) 470.7
Basset, Simon (15 H. II.) no,

372; (3 J.) 153; (4- JO "55 ;
(5 J.) 158-9; (6 J.) 164; (15
J.) 146; (22 H. III.) 462

Basset, Simon (Ric. T.) 294
Helezebeth, his wife

Basset, Thos. (3 H. III.) 184 ;
(7H. III.) 189; (32 H. III.)
216; (4 E. II.) 464

Basset, ux. Simon (7 J.) 170
„ Wm. (15 H. 11.^ no;
(7R. I.) 295; (3 J.) 152; (9
J.) 175; (14 J.) 296; (3H.
III.) 185; (4. H. III.) 186;
(8H.III.) 191; (13 H. III.)
198; (14 H. III.) 200; (16
H. III.) 202; (18 H. III.)
206; (21 H. III.) 418; (30
H. III.) 214; (38 H. III.)
222; (43 H. III.) 228; (6E.
I.) 240; (7 E. I.) 241; 15 E.
I.) 247; (II E. II.) 453

Basselew, Wm., 28 E. i, 258

Bassingburn, John, 16 J., 182 ; —
Albreda (27 H. III.) 436-43 j
(1198) 387; (14 J.) 403;—
Warin (31 H. III.) 421

Basingworth, Monks of, 2 H. 3,
408

Basteinbury, Toustan, 270

Bataille, Choc., 16 H. i, 1 12
„ Thos., 46 H. 3, 231

Bate, Alice fil Wm., 46 H. 3,

231

Isabella, her sister, id.

Bate, Robert, Chesterfield, 32

£. I, 261
Bale, Wm. (13 E. 1.) 246; (10

H. VI.) 503
Bate, Wm., Sandiacre, 33 E. I,

262 ; Peter, his heir
Bate, Wm. fil (Hockton) 32

£. I, 261
Bateford, John, 21 H. 3, 420
Bateley = Batheley

,. Rich (34 E. I.) 262;

Wm.'*(27 H. III.) 438; (6

E. II.) 468
Battorp, Robert, 28 H. 2, 128
Battel, Robert, 12 J., 177
Batty, Wm., 24 H. 3, 210
Bauderton, Alexdr., 7 J., 168
Baxter, Hugo, 20 E. 3, 493
Bayle, Robert (27 H. IH.) 427 ;

(3411. III.) 219
Beaumond, Henry, 4 E. 2,

465
Beatrice, wo. of Theobald, 2 J.,

150
Beauchamp, Hugh, 14 J., 401
„ John (21 H. III.)

416-23 ; (27 H. III.) 447
Beauchamp, Nliles, 21 H. 3, 420
„ Richard, 21 H. 3,

470
Beauchamp, Stephen (1198),

388; (14 J.) 401; (21 H. III.)

413-4
Beauchief, Abbot, 20 E. 3,

475
Beaufoy, Emma, ( 14 J.) 296 ;

(2 H. III.) 406 ; (21 H. VI.)

38.41.
Beauioft, Roger, 5 H. 3, 187
Bealmeis, Rad, 5 H. 2, 104
Bee = Bek = Bak (?)
Bek, Alianor, 39 H. 3, 224
Alessor, 39 H. 3, 221
Anthony (21 H. III.) 416 ;

(22 H. III.) 462
Bek, Arnold (23 H. II.) 123;

(34 H. II.) 13s
Bek, Ernald (Cerlif.) 307 (1175)
Galf(22 H. in.) 208; (25

H. III.) 211 ; (T. de N.)

307 ; (27 H. III.) 444
Bee, Hy. (1175) 307. I34 ; (23

H. II.) 123; (39 H. III.) 223

»»

It

M

It

II

f»

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Bek, Hy. de (1175) 307, 184;
32 H. 2, 132
Avic, his wife, id»
Bek, John fil Hugo, ii E. 2,

454
Bek, Nich, 21 E. 3, 480

„ Rich, 21 H. 2, 117

„ RoJ)ert, 4j., 155

„ Simon, 48 H. 3, 232

„ Walter (certif.) 308; 5

H. 2, 104-6, bis

„ Walter, 33 H. 2, 134
Beckingham, Robt, 2 J., 148
Bedalme, Jolm, 48 H. 3, 282
„ Rich, „

„ Wm., ,,

Bedul, Roger, 48 H. 3, 232
Bedford, Rich fil Rich, 16 H. 3,

203
Bedingfield, Adam (2 J.) 151 ;

(4 J.) 155; (5J-) >6o
Beighton, Thos., 27 E. i, 255
Bekingham, Hugh, 26 E. i, 255
Elias, 13 E. I, 246
Gilbt, 4 E. I, 238
Richard fil Simon,

32 E. I, 261
Bekingham, Wm., 7 E. i, 241
Bekington, Dna, 392
Beler, Roger (i E. I.) 238 (Tyb-

shelf) ; (21 E. I.) 481 ; (20

E. III.) 471-5.85.
Bel, Hugo (10 H. III.) 195;

(sheriflO(i2 H. III.) 195; (19

H. III.) 206; (34 K. I.) 262
Bel, Peter le, 2 J., 148
Bellaaqua, Adam, 6 J., 166-7

Robert (9 H. III.)

193; (13 H. III.) 196
Bellaaqua, Sarrn, 8 J., 1 72

Thom (27 H. III.)

439; (18 E. I.) 250
Bellaaqua, Wm. (21 H. III.)

442 ; (4 E. I.) 239
Beldeston, Andrew fil Wm., i

E. I., 237
Belewe, Wm., 22 H. 2, 119
Belegrave, Robt., 18 E. I, 250
Belisme, Rob., H. r, 350-85
Belleshover (see Holsover)
Bellus, Alan, Newarc, 18 H. 3,

205
Belli, Peter, 32 H. 2, 132
Bellingham, Nic fil Roger, 39

H. 3, 223
Bellingham, Alexr., Wm., and

Alan, 39 H. 3, 223
Bellomonte, Hugo, fil Richard,

55 H. 3, 236
Beltofi, Alan (53 H. III.) 235 ;

(55 H. III.) 237; (I E. I.)

238; (4 E. I.) 238; (5 E. I.)

240
Belloft, Roger (4 H. III.) 187;

(8 H. III.) 190

S17

Beltoft, Walter, 55 H. 3, 237
BELLOCAMPO, HUGO (22

H. II.) 121 ; (24 H. 2) 123;

(4 J.) 156; (6 J.) 164; (13

J.) 178; (15 J.) 146; (16 J.)

181.
Rellocampo, John (24 H. II.)

123; 8 H. 3, 192; (13 H.

III.) 199; (14 H. III.) 200;

(16 H. III.) 202; (30 H.

III.) 214; (38 H. III.) 222;

(43 H. III.) 228; (7 E. I.)

241 ;(I3E. I.) 247
Bellocampo, Milo (5 J.) 159 ; (6

J.) 162-4
Bellocampo Philip (Certif.) 314
Rich (sheriff) (5 J.)

159; (6J.) 164; (7 J.) (sheriff)

167; (6-8 J.) 172; (9 J.) 173

Bellocampo, Robt. (Certif.) 337

„ Simon, 38 H. 3,

222
Bellocampo, Wm. 31 K. i, 260
BELFOU,BELFAGO. BEAU-
FOY, BEFEAU, BELVOIR
Bclfou, Emma, 335; (I3j.)l78;

(16 J.) 182; (3 H. III.) 185;

(8 H. III.) 190-2; (13 H. III.)

198; (14 H. III.) 200; (15

H. III.) 202 ; (30 H. III.)

214 ; (43 H. III.) 228 ; (7 E.

I.) 241; (15 E. I.) 247
Helfago, Emma, 38 H. 3, 222
Belfou, Ralf(3i H. I.) 95 ; (n

H. II.) 1*7-8; (15 H. II.)

Ill; (37 H. HI.) 221; (39

H. III.) 224
Belfou, Magr. Robt., 27 E. i,

255 bis
Belfou, Robt. (7 J.) 169 ; (28 E.

I.) 258
Beaufoy, Robt., bailiff of Not-

tingham, 34 E. i, 262
Belfou, Thos., 23 H. 2, 123
Belvoir, Wm., 7 J., 167
Belveis, Wm. (7 J.) 169 ; (il J.)

Belmes, Wm., 6 J., 164
Bentley, Wm., 21 H. 2, 117
Heneston, Rich., 46 H. 3, 231
Bental, Wm., 26 E. i, 254
Bentley, Richard, fil and heir

Henry, 11 E. 2, 452
Benetley, Rich., 9 J., 173
Bentems, Hugo, 41 H. 3, 226
Benteshill, Rd. fil Thos., 10 H.

3, 195
Bercar, Matilda, widow of Tom,

38 H. 3, 222

(Bulcote)

Bercarii, Deine, Barlbro, 5 H. 3,

187
Bercher, Hy., Boylstone (32 E.

I.) 261 ; (II E. II.) 452
Bercher, John, ii E. 2, 452

5i8

Berde, Rich., 28 E. I, 258

„ Wm., 1 1 E. 2, 454
Berde, John, 27 E. i, 255

„ Roger, 27 E. I, 255
Berde, (J.)(6 H. VI.) 496
Berde, Thos., heirs of, II E. 2,

455 (^^^ Birde)
Beresford, Edmund, 6 H. 6,495
Bereweby, John, 43 H. 3, 227

M., his wife
Berford, Edmund, 20 E. 3, 475
„ Edward 20 E. 3, 486
„ Eliz., the wo. of Bald-

w)Ti, 13 H. 6, 483
Berford, Rich., Suthel, 17 H. 3,

203
Berg, Rich., 46 H. 3, 231
Bergcrvilla, Henry, 2 J., 148
Berkeley, Giles, (18 H. III.)

205; (22 H. III.) 462; (27

H. III.) 442 ; (30 E. I.) 470
Berkeley, Senioris, 6 H. 6,

492
Berkeley, Nic, 44 H. 3, 229

Robt. fil Wm , Child-

cote (13 H. III.) 199; (18 H.

III.) 203
Berkeley, Thos. (grandson of

Giles) 20 E. 3, 47086
Berkeley, Wm., 9 J., 292
Berkier, Rich., 8 J., 172
Berkshire, Adam (sheriff, Certif.)

310
Berlington, Abb, 12 J., 176 •
Bernecol, Robt. (Certif.) 315
Bemak, Rich. (20 E. I.) 251 ;

(II E. II.) 452
Berneby, Wm., 12 E. 1, 245
Bernhall Thos., 21 E. i, 481
Bertram, Robt., 7 J., 168

„ Wm. (Bingham) 13 E.

1,245
BERTREA, THE COUN-
TESS, 12 J., 177
Bert well, Simon, 31 E. i, 481
Besant, Wm., 13 H., 196
Beskwood, Nich, ii E. 2, 452
Beston, Gervase fi Robt., 53 H.

3,235
Beston, John, 43 H. 3, 227

„ Wm., 7 J., 168
Bestorp, Regin, 13 H. 2, 109

„ Rich., 13 J., 178
Bethage, Alan., 44 H. 3, 230
Beton, John, 10 H. 6, 503
Betton, Ralph, fil Jordan, 55 H.

3,237
Bevels, R«)bt., 11 J,, 175

Beverel, Robt., 9 J., 173

Bevercote, Johanna, widow of

Robt., II J., 175
Bevercote, Robt., il J., 174;

(Chavelworth) 12 J., 177
Bevcot, Roger (3 J.) 153 ; (4 J.)

155-6; (5 J) 156; (6 J.) 163

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Bevcotc, Wm. (10 R.) 145 ^s ;

146, 147 ; (21 H. HI.) 418-21 ;

(27 H. HI.) 431; (33 E. I.)

126
Bevereg, Rich. (19 E. I.) 251 ;

(21 £. III.) 481
Beulaco, Alice, widow of Alex.,

13 J., 178
Beulaco, Barth, 12 J., 176
Beverle, Robt., 5 J., 158,
Bey, Robt., 32 H. 3, 216
Bixcrop, Matthew, 3 H. 3, 184
Biars, Hy. (1039) 296 (see

Avenel)
Biars, Sigembert (1039) 296
Bidon, John, 22 H. 2, 119
Bigg, Hugo, 29 E. I, 258
Bigging, Walter, 9 H. 3, 193
Bilburc, Alan de, 12 H. 2, 108
„ Herbert, 31 H. I, 95
„ John, 27 E. I, 255
Bilston, Ralf, fil Roger (Certif. )

310
Bingham, Hugh (R. I.) 387;

(14 J.) 402; (16 J.) 182; (3

H. 3) 185
Bingham, Hugo, fit Wm., 4 E.

1,239
Bingham, Rich. (10 E. I.) 243 ;

(23 E. I.) 253; (29 E. I.) 259
Bingham, Robt., 7 J., 168

„ Silvester, 16 H. 3, 203
„ Wm., (2iH.II.)ii8;

(6 H. VI.) 495
Bircheved, Robt., 5 H. 3, 188
Birchover, John, 12 H. 3, 196
Birch wood, Alexr., 5 H. 3, 188
„ Hermit of, 167

„ Henry (21 H. III.)

416; (27 H. HI.) 446
Birchwood, Hugh, 21 H. 3, 423
Nich. (21 H. III.)

344 ; (34 E. I.) 262
Birchwood, Robt. (34 H. II.)

"35 ; (5 J-) >59
Birestles, Rad, 32 H. 2, 132

Birde, Thos., heir of Rich le

Ragged (14 £. I.) 246 ; (11 E.

".) 455
Birkin, John (8 H. III.) 190

dis; (13 H. III.) 196
Birkin, Robert, 10 H. 6, 498
„ Roger, 122
„ Tom (13 H. III.) 196 ;

(14 H. III.) 200; (16 H. III.)

202 ; (20 H. III.) 207 ; (30

H. III.) 214; (31 H. HI.)

222
Birkin, Tom fil John, 13 H. 3,

196
Biset, Hy. 31 H. 2, 131

,, John, heirs of, 27 H. 3,

443
Biset, Manassah (2 H. II.) 102-

4; (14H. II.) 107 •

9*

»>

Biset, Walter, 36 H. 3, 220

„ Wm., 31 H. I, 95
Bissop, Leoffwine, 12 H. 2, loS

„ Robt (27 H. IH.) 4:17 ;

(34 H. III.) 218
Blabre, Wm. (27 E. I.) 255;

(II E. II.) 452
Blackburn, Rich, late Bailiff of

Nottingham, 27 E. I, 255
Blackfordby, Simon, 10 H. 6,

506
Black man, 4 H. 3, 186 dis.
Black well, Leofric, 21 H. 2, 117
„ Maur, 21 H. 2, 117
„ Reginald, 21 H. 2, 117
„ Robert, lo H. 6, 499-

500
Blackwell, Wm., 10 H. 6, 501
Blanch Nef, The, 344, 352
Blaston, Hugh, 22 H. 3, 209
Blaunchfront, Walter, 392
Blith, Prior (5 J.) 158 ; (21 H.

III.) 422 ; (27 H. III.) 431 ;

(9 E. I.) 242 ; (II E. II.) 455
Blie, Gilbt fil Galf, 13 E. I, 245
Rad fil Gilbert, 2 J., 147
Roger fil Alan, 2 J., 148
Blyda, Roger (Carlton), 12 £. I,

245

Beatrice, his wife, ,,

Blye, Thos. fil Robt. (50 H. III.)
234 ; (5 E. I.) 239 ; (9 E. I )
242; (17 E. I.) 249-50

Bligh, Wm., 2 J., 148

Blighthorne, Wm., 21 E. 3,
481

Bloet, Bishop Robert, H. 2, 315

Blt}me, Galf, Langford, 4 E. i,

239
Blount, Sanchia, wo. of Walter,

13 H. 4, 483
Blount, Thos. (6 H. VI.) 485-6-
9-492; (10 H. VI.) 502-7-9-
10
Blowhome, Wm., 10 H. 6, 507
Blund, Alan, 32 H. 3, 216
Galf, 9 H. 3, 193
Hy., Newton (27 E. I.)

255; (II E. II.) 454
Blund, Malger, 12 H. 2, 108
Pagan, 22 H. 3, 208
Rad, 13 H. 2, 109
Ric, 10 H. 3, 195

„ Rich, Heveringham, 44

H. 3, 230
Blund, Wm., 22 H. 2, 1 19

„ Wm. (Blythe) 5 E. i, 240
Blunt, Wm., 11 E. 2, 453
Bobenhill, Ralf fil Thos., 6 £. i,

240
Bodingselles (? Doding^ells)
Bodingselles, Wm., 20 £. 3, 486
Boetes, Wm., 8 H. 3, 190
Bohun, Hump (H. II.) 277 ; (28

E. I.) 257

t,

if

INDEX OF PERSONS.

519

Boite, Rob., Hertington, 25 H.

3» 2"
Boitorp, Rich, 32 H. 2, 132

Bolbec, Hugh, 12 J., 177
„ Ralf, 8 R. I, 367

Bolingbrook, Bertram, 21 E. 3,
481

Boliz, Rd., Flintham, 5 £. I,
240

BOLOGNE, EARL OF (17 H.

II.) 112; (14 J.) 399
Bo]on, Adam, 28 H. 2, 129

„ Robert, 43 H. 3, 227
Bolsover, Alan, (1 198) 388, 2 J.

156
Bolsover, Magister Alan (6 J.)

161-165; (12 J.) 177; (14 J.)

399; (3H. III.) 173
Bolsover, Rd., 20 H. 2, 116

„ Thorn., 23 E. I, 252
Bolton, Tom, 22 H. 2, 121
Bond de Acra de Lindibi, 12

H. 2, 108
Bond, Hy., 14 H. 3, 199

„ Rad, 32 H. 3, 216

„ Wm., 38 H. 3, 222
Boney, Hugh, 343

„ Ralf fiu Hugh, 343

„ Ada, 342

„ Walter, 22 H. 2, 120
Bone, Isaac, 20 H. 3, 207
Boneye, Martin, 33 H. 3, 217
Bonham, Galf, 19 E. I, 251
Bonhume, Simon, 41 H. 3, 226
Bonington, Jo., (13 H. IV.)

483; (10 H. VI.) 510
Bonserieant, Hugo, 13 E. i, 245
Bontesham, Hubert de, 12 H.

3, 108
Booth, Hy., 10 H. 6, 510
Bordesdon, John, 11 E. 2, 454
Borrohard, see Bosco Rohardi
Boscerville, John, H. 2, 289
Boskervilie, Jo., 22 H. 2, 119
Boscherville, John fil Ralf, H.

2, 296
Boscherville, Ralf (H. II.) 289;

(23 H. II.) 122
Boscherville, Ralf fil Wm., Cer-
tify 293; (1175) k/. 296
Boskervill, Robt., D., 293
Boscheville, Wm., Certif., 293,

296
Bosco, Alan (32 E. I.) 261 ; (11

E. II.) 453
Bosco, Alan fil Galf, I R. i

(Pickering) 317
Bosco, Alan fil Roald (Newark)

id.
Bosco, Alexr. (33 E. I.) 261 ;

(II E. II.) 454
Bosco, Alice, 316
„ Anselm, 27 H. 3, 212
„ Amald, Sheriff, 23 H. 3,
209

»>

II

11

II

If

II

Bosco, Emald, 345 ; 25 H. 3, 210
Bosco, Galfry (Newark) 317
John, 55 H. 3, 237
John, 10 H. 3, 194
Rad (Doubridge) (32 E.

I.)26i; (iiE. 1I.)453 .
Bosco, Rad (4 E. I.) 238 ; (32

E. I.) 261 ; (II E. II.) 453
Bosco, Roald (Newark) 317
Robt., 31 £. I, 260
Rohardi Elias, 315
Waller Lockton, 345 ;

Pickering, H. 3, 317 ; (Barl-

bro, father of Simon de Sit-
well) id.
Bosco, Wm., c. J., 317
Bossard, Jo., 27 H. 3, 441
Hotel, Wm., Middleton, 24 E. I,

253
Boteler, Almaric, 14 H. 3, 201
Botiler, John, 30 E. i, 259

„ John, Hocreton (19 E.

I.) 251 ; (6 H. VI.) 495
Boteler, Roger, Stoke, 13 E. I,

246
Botiler, Roger (44 H. III.) 229 ;

(48 H. HI.) 233
Botiler, Wm. (21 H. III.) 418-

21 ; (27 H. III.) 440 ; (17 E.

I.) 249
Botiler, Wm., Crophill, 34 E. I,

262
Boterwyc, John, 17 E. i, 249
Bothe, Henry (6 H. 6) 490;

(10 H. VI.) 506-10
Bothe, John (ii H. II.) 453;

til John, id. (6 H. VI.) 48 ;

(10 H. 6) 502-4-7
Bothe, Robert del (33 E. I.)

261 ; (II £. II.) 454
Bottesford, see Botilersford
,, Alice, wo. Waltr, 27

E. I, 256
Bottesford, Alice, 40 H. 3, 224
John, her brother
Roger, 26 E. I, 255
Walter, I E. I, 238
Bou, Wm., 55 H. 3, 237
Boudon, Robt., 28 £. i, 258
Boughton, Rad fil Rich., 48 H.

3, 232
Boun, Serjeant, his account of

the Caus Family, 327
Boues, Wm. (5 H. HI.) 184;

(21 H. III.) 418-21 ; (40

(H. III.) 225; (41 H. III.)

226
Bouchmaler, Humph., 13 E. I,

246
Boueton, Galf, 12 E. i, 245
Bouh, Mr. J., 5

Bous — Bovis, Wm., 21 H. 2,
Bowre, Thurslan, 13 H. 4, 483
Bowden, Nic, 10 H. 6, 502
Boyes, Wm., 27 H. 3, 437

n

II

Boylston, Thos. (11 E. I.) 455 ;

Propositus of, id.
Bozun, ]ohn (30 E. I.) 472 ; (20

E. m.)477
Bozun, Robt. (55 H. III.) 237 ;

(II E. II.) 455
Bozun, Robt., late Bailiff of

Peak, 27 E. I, 255
Bozun, Roger, 27 H. 3, 442
Braborn, John, 10 H. 6, 507
Braciator, Hy. (Blythe), 9 J. I,

243
Brad burn, Godard (1205) 333

Hy. (28 E. I.) 257;

(II E. II.) 454

Bradburn, John ( 13 H. IV.) 483 ;

(6 H. VI.) 48690; (10

H. VI.) 509

Bradburn, Wm., I H. 8, (Wa-

lesby), 313
Bradbury, Rich, 10 H. 6, 500
Bradfield, Thos., 10 H. 6, 510
Bradford, Thos., 10 H. 6, 504
Bradesham, Nicolas fil Hugo,

37 H. 3, 221
Bradlega, Walkelin, 27 H. 2,

127
Bradley, Matilde, widow of Ralf,

53 H. 3, 235
Bradley, Walkelin, 27 H. 2,

308
Bradmere, Elias (53 H. HI.)

236; (19 E. I.) 251
Bradmere, Henry, 21 H. 3, 413
„ Rich. (17 J.) 182;

(46 H. III.) 231
Bradmere, Thos., 13 E. I, 245
„ Wm.(55H.III.)237;
(4 E. I.) 239
Bradshaw, Alex., 21 £.3, 486
„ Hy., 10 H. 6, 508

„ John, 10 H. 6, 507
Roger, 13 H. 4, 483
Thos., 10 H. 6, 507
Wm. (46 H. III.)

II

11

i>

231 ; (10 H. VI.) 500
Bradshaw, Thos., 31 E. i, 260
Brad well, Galf, 28 E. I, 258
Braideston, Dna, 30 E. i, 472
Brailsford, Ailsin, 306

Hy.(iJ.)i47; 27 H.
III.) 444; (40 H. IH.) 224;
(43 H. III.) 227 ; (4 £. II.)
464 ; (T. de N.) 306 ; (20 E.
III.) (B. of A.) 476-86 ; fil
Ralf (20 E. III.) 475
Brailsford, Maurice, i J., I47
Hugo, td.
Eutropius, id,^
„ Hy. fil H., 19 £. I,
251
Brailsford, Nic. (Certif.) 306

Henry, his son
Brailsford, Ralf, 306 ; (30 E. I.)
471-2-5 ; (20 E. III.) 475

II

520

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Brailsford, Robt. fil Hy. (14

E. I.) 247 ; (20 E. I.) 251
Brailsford, Robt., brother of

Henry, 46 H. 3, 231
Braiose, Wm., 6 J., 165
Bradeston, Elias, 34 H. 2, 135
Breydeston, Steph., 27 E. I, 255
,, Wm. fil Henry, 27

H. 3, 444
Breydeston, Dna de, 30 E. I,

472

Brad well, John, 10 H. 6, 499

Biaibroc, Robt., 12 J., 177

Braitoft, Robt. fil Wm., 53 H.

3i235
Bramley, Roger, 5 H. III., 187

Bramcote, Reg., 13 J., 178

Brampton, Ingelram, 25 H. 2,

124

Brampton, Peter fil Adam, H.

2,333
Brampton, Wm., 10 II. 6, 496

Bramwic, Rich, 39 H. 3, 224

Bratington, Henr. (Cap.) 9 H.

3, 193
Braunford, Peter, 20 E. i, 251

Bray, John (17 E. I.) 249; (27

E. I.) 255
Brayne, Rich, 13 E. I, 245

Emma, his wife
Brazur, Rich le, 4 E. I, 239
Breant, Fulc, 330
Bredon, Prior of (27 H. IH.)

427; (34 H. III.) 218
Bredon, Ysolde (4 J.) 154 ; (6

J-) 163
Bredon, Wra., 31 E. i, 260
Breadsale, Rich, the Prior of,

10 H. 6, 502
Breadsale, Wm., 27 H. 3, 427
Brestorp, Rich, 12 Jo., 177
Bretby Letwin, 12 H. 2, 108
Bretel, Agatha fil Hugh (1198)

389; (14 J.) 179
Bretel, Hugh, 31 Hy. I, 97

Agatha fil Hugh, I John, 97

Breteville, Roger, 48 H. 3, 232

„ Wm., „

Breuse, Wm. fil Reginald, 28

E. I, 257
Brewood, Prior, ii E. 2, 456
Breyeshal, Wm., 40 H, 3, 225
Breyevill, Wra., 20 E. 3, 491
Breynes, Henry, 6 H. 6, 490
Bridgeford, Wm., Shreiveion,

46 H. 3, 230 ^
Brian, Hugo, 13^. i, 246

,, Vintner^j J., 152

,, 5o.> Nottingham, 27 E.

i»255
Brian, Rd., 16 H. 3, 203

„ Robt (13 H. III.) 196;

(16 H. III.) 203
Brian, Vint., of Nottingham, 5

H. 3, 188

Brian, Wm. (16 H. III.) 303;
(19 H. III.) 207; (23 H.Iir.)
209; (39 H. III.) 224; (1 E.

I-) 237
Briciive, Henry fil. 24 H. 3, 210

Briencourt, Galf (Certif.), 309

„ Gauf, 4 H. 2, 103

Brinton, Robert, H. 2, 275

BRETON, BRITAIN, BRET,

BRITO, BRETUN—
Breton, Com, 3 J., 154

„ Countess, 2 J., 150
Brito, Adam, 9 J., 173
Brelun, Elias (27 H. III.) 429 ;

(34 H. III.) 218
Brito, Hy., Hucnal, 5 J., 158
Bretun, John, 13 E. i, 246
Bret, John fil Hugo, 33 E. I,

261
Bret, John fil Robt, 17 E. i, 249
Breton, Nich, 4 E. I, 238
„ Rad, 4 E. I, 239
„ Nic fil Galf, 48 H. 3,

232
Breton, Ralf, 40 H. 3, 224
Brito, Ranulf, 13 H. 3, 196 ; of

Annersley (1161), 342
Brito, Rich, 11 J., 175
Bretton, Rich le (39 H. HI.)

223 ; (50 H. III.) 233 ; (7

E. I.) 241 ; (15 £. I.) 247
Bretton, Robt. (5 J.) 160; (6 J.)

164
Bretton, Robt, Walton (3 J.)

»54; (5J-) 159; (6 J.) 160;

(7 J.) i-jobisi (16 J.) 181-2;

(8H. III.) 191; (53 H. III.)

235 ; (55 H. III.) 236 ; (7 E.

I.) 241 ; (20 E. III.) 476
Bretton, Robert fil Roger, 35

H. 3, 219
Bret, Roger (12 E. I.) 244 ; (27

E. I.)255

Sarra, his wife, fil Wiverton „
Brito, Roger (1102) 342; (8

H. in.) 199; (14 H. III.)

200; (16 H. HI.) 212; (21

H. III.) 415-6-8-23; (22 H.

III.) 460; (27 H. in.) 446;

(30 H. III.) 214 ; (38H. HI.)

222; (43 H. III.) 228; (30

E. I.) 471 ; (31 E. I.) 260;

(4 E. II.) 464
Breton, Roger, White well, 40

H. 3, 224
Bret, Roger fil Hugo, 32 E. i,

261
Breton, Thos. (16 H. III.) 203 ;

(27 H. III. 427; (26 E. I.)

254
Bryto, Wm. (8 J.^ 171 ; (35 H.

III.) 220
Bretun, Wm., Hucnal, 34 H. 3,

218
Brito, Wm. Bucks, 4 E. I, 239

Britrychfeld, Thos., 10 H. 6,

500
Bnmington, Almaric, 29 H. 2,

129
Brimington, John (22 H. III.)

459; (17 E. I.) 249 J (II E.

II.) 454; (21 E. III.) 480;

(10 H. VI.) 509
Brimington, Peter (25 H. II.)

124; (9 J.) 173
Brimington, Robt. fil Peter (4

J.) 363; (5 J.) 158
Brimington, Rd., 21 H. 2, 107

„ Robt., 5 H. 3, 188

BRIWERE, BARONY OF,

361, 372, 387
Briwere, Grecia, 28 E. i, 257
Bnier, Ralf fil, H. 2, 276

„ Rich., 2 H. 3, 395
Briwere, Wm., loi, 166, 266-7 ;

(sheriflf) (6 J.) 126-161 ; (7 J.)

167.170; (8 J.) 171 ; (12 J.)

176; (13 J.) 178; (I4j.)4«);
(16 J.) 182; (2 H. III.) 395 ;
(3H.III.) 183-5; (5H. HI.)
188; (8 H. III.) 191-2; (9
H. III.) 193.4; <I2 H. III.)
197 ; (14 H. III.) 2cx> ; (15
H. III.) 203; (17 H. III.)
204; (21 H. III.) 418; (27
H. III.) 443; (30 H. III.)
222

Briwere, Wm., senr., 8 H. 3, 192
„ Wm., 13 H. 3, 199 ^i>
,, Wm., heirs of (30 H.
III.) 214-5; (43 H. III.) 228 ;
(7 E. I.) 241 ; (15 E. I.) 247

Broc, Nigel, 2 H. 2, 102, 103

Broculstona, Eustace, 28 H. 2,
128

Broculstona, Galfr, 14 J., 398
„ Gilbert, 33 H. 2,

134
Bruchton, Jo., 16 H. 3, 203

Brugg, Peter, 10 H. 6, 510

Bruin, Wm., 5 H. 3, 187

„ John, Ekington, 21 E. 3,

480
Bruin, Robert, Ekington,. 2 1 £.

3.480
Brumley, Roger (5 H. Ill), 187 ;

(13 J.) 178
Bronis, Hugh, 10 H. 3, 502
Brun, 16 H. 2, 203

M Jo. (17 J.) 182; (10 H.

VI.) 504
Brun, Alice, his wife, 504

„ Nich, 10 H. 6, 501

„ Rich, Nottingham, 22 H.

3,208
Brun, Rich, Nortwell, 18 E. i,

250
Brun, Robt., 28 E. I, 258

„ Robt., Walkeringham, 12

E. I, 245

Bnin, Rubt., Calverton, 43 H. 3,
226

Brun, Roger, i E. I, 238
„ VVm., 25 H. 3, 210
„ Wm. (Lailiff) Derby (12
J.) 244; (14E. I.) 246

Brunesley = Brinnesly

BRUNESLY SERJEANTY,

436
Brannesley, Galf (1198) 383 ; (5

J.) 159
Brunnesley, Gilbert (26 H. III.)

212; (27 H. III.) 430-4; (34
H. III.) 218; (43 H. III.)
226; (44 H. III.) 230; (53
H. III.) 235; (55 H. III.)

237
Brunnesley, Gilbert fil Roger, 12

H. 3, 383
Brunnesley, Matilda, widow of

Robert, 358
Brunnesley, Rich., 21 H. 3, 415
Robt. (II H. III.)

383; (14 H. III.) 201 ; (19

H. III.) 206; (27 H. III.)

430; (34 H. III.) 329; (43

H. III.) 227 •
lirunnesley, Roger fil Gilbert,

8 E. I, 242
Brunnesley, Roger (12 H. III.)

197,383; (13 H. III.) 196;

(13 E. I.) 246 ; (19 E. I.) 251
Brunig, Wm., 44 H. 3, 230

Adam his brother
Bernolveston ( Brunolveston )

Odo, 28 H. 2, 128
Brunton, Wm. fil Wm., 5 H. 3,

188
Hrunus, 27 H. 2, 126
Brus, Peter, 7 J., 168

„ Robert, 29 H. 3, 213
Brut, R(^er (qy. Bret) 11 E. 2,

453
Bubendon, Nigel, 15 H. 2, iii
Buche, John, i J., 147
Buckbridge, Martin, 9 H. 3,

"93
Buckingham, Robt. fil Robt.,

40 H. 3, 224
BUCKTON = BUXTON,

BOKETON, BUKTON—
Buckton, Dna, 391 ; (5 J.) 160 ;

(6 J.) 166
Bukton, Hy. (12 J.) 177; (14 J.)

179; (8H. III.) 190; (10 H.

III.) 195; (14 H. III.) 199;

(27 H. III.) 441
Boketon, Nic, 5 £. I, 240
„ Roger, 12 J., 176
„ Thos. (26 £. I.) 254;

(10 H. VI.) 499
Bokelon, Wm. (43 H. III.) 227 ;

(44 H. III.) 230; (46 H. III.)

236 (ter)
Budington, Ralf (Certif.) 337

36

»i

)i

>i

INDEX OF PERSONS.
Buell, Elias, Tickenhal, 4 H. 3,

187

Wm., td,
Uugeford, Rad, 10 H. 6, 501
Bugge, see Willouchby
Bugge, Edward, 6 H. 6, 495
Galf, 23 E. I, 253
Hugo, 27 E. I, 255
Ralf (II J.) 175; (12 J.)
176 ; (22 H. HI.) 208 ; (37
H. III.) 221 ; (38 H. III.)
222; (41 H. III.) 226; (44
H. III.) 230; (46 H. III.)
231 ; (53 H. III.) 235 ; (55
H. III.) 236
Bugge, Ralf (Not.) 28 H. 3, 212
„ Rich. 7 E. I, 241

Rich, fil Rich. (13. E. I.)
246; (19 E. I.) 251
Bugge, Wm., 16 J., 180
„ Wm., Nottm., 53 II. 3,

235
Bulcole, Nigel de, 53 H. 3, 235

Reg., (4 J.) 154; (6j.)

'63
Bulleye, Wm., 48 H. 3, 233

Bulingel, Rich., 13 E. I, 246

Hullebi, Ailward, 15 H. 2, ill

Bullock, J osceus, Lincoln, 4 E. I,

239
Bulwel, Herbert, 25 H. 2, 124

„ Rad, 33 H. 2, 134

„ Rich.filRad,i9H. 3,206

Bulwel, Swein de, 12 H. 2, 108

Buneie, Passilew, 16 H. 3, 203

Bungehaia, Simon, 20 H. 3, 207

Hurdon, Elizabeth ux John, 25

E. 3» 316
Burdon, John (15 II. II.) ill;

(27 H. III.) 431-2-440; <25

H. III.) 316 ; of Mapelbcck
Burdon, John fil John, 6 E. 2,

316
Burdon, Ralf, 12 H. 2, 119
„ Wm. (15 H. II.) hi;

(16 J.) 181
Burdet, Wm., 316
Burdgate, Robt., 9 J. 174
Burebec, Matilda, 34 H. 3, 217

„ Ralf, 18 H. 2, 115
Burgaville, Ad., 38 H. 3, 222
Buregar, Jordan, 51 H. 3, 236
Burgh, Abbot of, 69
BURGO, HUBERT, C. J. of

EngUnd(6J.)i65;(i3j.)i78;

(3 H. III.) 185; (27 H. III.)

463
Burgo, Rad (14 E. I.) 246 ; (il

E. II.) 455
Burgo, Salom, 5 11. 3, 187
Burgunion, Robt., 21 H. 2, 117
Burle Hugo, 13 H. 3, 199
Burnel, Hugh, Is., Widow of,

31 E. I, 260
Burnel, Robt., 32 E. i, 260

521

Burnet, Rd., 8 H. 3, 190
BUKON, BARONY OF, 320,

383, 447
Huron, Henry (3 H. III.) 184 ;

(9 H. III.) 193
Buron, Hugo (1147) 320-42
„ John (12 J.) 177; (10 H.

III. 194; (15 E. I.) 247.8; of

C layworth (10 H. VI.) 509
Buron, Nicola, wo., Robert, 2 J.,

150
Buron, Ralf, 25, 59

„ Rd., (7 H. III.) 189 ; (6

H. VI.) 490
Buron, Roger (Certif.) 320 j (2

H. II.) loi; (II li. II.)I07;

(14 H. II.) 109; (22 H. II.)

119; (23 H. II.) 122 ; (31 H.

II-) »3» ; (33 H. II.) 134 ; (5

J.) 161 ; (I J.) 147
Burstal, Robt. (47 H. III.) 232 ;

(18 E. I.) 250 (fil John); {19

E. I.) 251 ; Margt., his wife,

id.
Burt, Nic (a judge) 458
Burtone, Abbot of, 25, 33, 68

bis, 69 ; (14 J.) 401 ; (lo H.

III.) 194; (22 H. III.) 460;

(27 H. III.) 434; (4 E. I.)

239; (II E. II.) 456
Burton, House of Lazarus, 30

E. I, 472
Burton, Henry, 12 J., 177
Mich, II E. 2, 452
Laurence, 8 H. 3, 192
Rich., 15 H. 2, III
Walter, 13 H. 2, 109
„ Wm. fil Rich., 38 H. 3,

822
Buvell, Wm., 14 J., 180
Busby, John, 18 H. 6, 496
BUSEI. BUSLI, BUILLI,

BUSIL—
Busey, Hugo (21 H. II.) 118;

(22 H. H.) 119; (37 H. IlL)

221 ; (43 H. III.) 226
Bussey, Hugo, 44 H. 3, 229
Bu.«sei, Humph. ^31 H. II.) 130 ;

(32 H. IL) 132
Huilli,Jo., 390; (31 H. IL) 131;

(2 J.) 148; (5 J.) 160; (9 J.)

173; (12 J.) 177; (3H. III.)

183
Busli, Jordan, 31 H. I, 94, 325
Builli, Rich. (12 H. IIL) 197 ;

(12 E. I.) 245
Bussel, Robt. (21 H. II.) 118;

(22 H. IL) 119; (28 H. II.)

128 ; (3 H. IIL) 185
Busli, Roger de, 25, 63, 87, 94,

98 ; D., 313, 385; (27 H. HI.)

431
Buszard, Roger, Certif., 315, see

Bossard

Butler, see Boliler

)i

it

a

522

Buyli, Wm., 38 H. 3, 222
Byle, Marg., 17 E. I, 249
Byleye, Thos., 20 E. I, 470
Byrks, Jo., 21 E. 3, 480
Byrton, Margt. ux Robert, 19

H. 3, 206
Byerne, Constance (16 E. I.)

248 ; of Whetel (32 E. I.) 261

Cachehors, Thos., 12 E. I, 244
Cade, Wm. de, 7 H. 2, 105
Cadworth, Wm., sheriff, 19 E.

1,250
Cadyn, Simon, 26 E. i, 255

Cufford, Alan, 13 H. 2, 109

Caisneto, Wm. (Certif.) 321

Caldun, Bertram (1208) 290

Alice, his wife

Caldwell, Ralf, 13}., 178

Calfour, Robt., 3 H. 3, 185

Calvere, David (i J.) 147 ; (2 J.)

149; (3 J.) 152
Calvoner, John, 30 E. I, 470-7

Caleston, Robert, I J., 147
„ Roger, I TOther of Wm.
(2j.) 148; (5 J.) 157
Callal, John, 10 H. 6, 503
„ Robt, 5 H. 3, 188
Calneton, Hugo, 12 J., 177
Calverton, Wm., (43 H. III.)

226 ; (5 E. I.) 241
Cambuiy, Wm., 6 H. 6, 493
Cameton, Alice, 21 H. 3, 418
Camara, Alice, widow of Her-
bert, 30 H. 3, 220
Cama, Avicc, wo. of Rich, 8

H. 3, 190
Camara, Galf, Certif. (29 H. II.)

289; (2 J.) 150
Cama, Hy., Stoke, 19 £. i, 251

Isabella, bis wife
Camara, Jo., 8 J., 172

Orenta, his wife, id,
Camara, Galf ( 1088) 323
„ Rann, 11 J., 174
„ . Rich (5 J.) 159; (6 J.)

164; (7 J.) 171; (7 H. HI.)

189
Camara, Roger (33 H. III.) 217 ;

(32 H. III.) 216
Camara, Stephen, 329
Cambrics, Hy., Certif., 290 ; T.

de N., D., 27 H. 3, 447
Cambries, Roger fil Walt. (1290)

290
Cambray, Wm., 13 H. 3, 197
Campana, Peter, 13 E. i, 245
Campbell, Robt., 2 J., 150
Campo, Emulpho Wm. (1088)

297
Campton, Nic, 53 H. 3, 234
Camviile, Ali>reda fil Wm. 292,

9 J.

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Camviile, Gerard, 30 E. I, 473
„ Geoffrey, 21 £. I,

303
Camviile, Petronilla ux Curzon,

283
Camviile, Waller, 283

Wm., 9 J., 169
Albreda, his wife, id
Candene, Henry, 44 H. 3, 229
Cante, Wm., 4 H. 3, 186
Cantelupe, Eva ux Wm., 28 E.

1,257
Cantelupe, John, 46 H. 3, 230
Cantelupe, Nic (48 H. III.) 232 ;

(20 E. III.) 475-85
Cantelupe, Eustacia, id,

„ Wm., sheriff, 23 H. 3,
209
Cantelupe, Wm. (2 H. III.) 405 ;
(5 H. III.) 187 ; (8 H. III.)
191; (13 H. III.) 199; (14
H. ni.) 200; (16 H. III.)
202 ; (21 H. III.) 414 ; (30
H. III.) 214.5; (43 H. III.)
228; (15 E. I.) 247; (30
E. I.) 472 ; (20 E. III.) 475
Cantwelle, Gilb., 2 H. 3, 410
Canterel, Nic, 1 1 E. 2, 453
Canwic, Raun, 6 J., 162
Capella, Hugo (27 H. III.)

436; (44 H. III.) 229
Capella, Robt. de, 21 H. 2, 117
„ Robt. fil. 4 H. 3, i86
„ Roger, 2 J., 150
Capons, Robert, 8 H. 3, 192
Carbonar, Ralf, 24 11. 2, 123
Carbonel, Adam, 27 E. I, 255
Cardvil, Robt., 14 £. I, 247
Carduil, Nic, 7 J., 168

Reginald, 8 H. 3, 190
Robt., 7 J., 168
Wm., 6 H. 6, 490
Cardun, Rich, 18 £. i, 250
„ Astin, 16 H. 3, 203
Carleol, Rejil., 13 J., 178

„ Rob, 10 H; 3, 195
Carlisle, Epis. (2 H. III.) 408 ;
(20 H. III.) 207 ; (27 H. III.)

463
Carlton, Hy., 14 J,, 179

„ Jordan, 12 H. 2, 108
„ John fil Waller, 33 H.
3, 217
Carlton, Ralf, 15 H. 2, 11 1
„ Ralf fil Wm., 43 H. 3,
227
Carlton, Rich, 12 H. 3, 197
„ Robt., 330
„ Thos. fil Rad, 48 H. 3,
232
Carlton, Wm., ii E. 2, 452-4
Carpenter, Alan, Beatrice, widow

of, II E. 2, 456
Carpenter, Brunei, 4 H. 3, 186
„ Gilbert, 21 H. 2, 118

„

},

Carpenter, Henry (Hokedon),

43 H. 3, 227
Carpenter, John fil Robert, 4

E. I, 239
Carpenter, Rich, Carlton (22

H. III.) 208; (40 H. III.)

224
Carpenter, Robt. (4 H. III.)

186; (53 H. III.) 237; (4

E. I.) 239
Carpenter, Thomas, 4 H. 3, 186
„ William fil Alan, the

elder, 11 E. 2, 456
Carpenter, .William fil Alan, the

younger, ii E. 2, 456
Carettar, Wm., 5 H. 3, 188
Caruier, Peter, 6 J., 162
Cashal, Wm., 32 E. i, 261
Caschin, 31-7
Caskin, Nic fil Hugh, 11 E. 2,

453
Castell, Herbert, 275

Castellan, Wm., 12 H. 2, 108

Castel, Adam, 16 H. 3, 203

Castleton, John, 10 H. 6, 501

Castro, Rich (Bekingham), 43

H. 3, 227

Cat, Wm. fil Rich le, 32 H. 2,

"33
Catclive, Wm., 19 E. I., 251

Catebi, Robert, 6 J., 182

Cateby, Felicia, Prioress of, i
E. I, 238

Cattesden, Alan, 35 H. 2, 136
„ Simon of, id.

Cathorpe, Simon, 23 H. 2, 123

Cavelunt, Nic, i J., 147

Cavis, H., 289

CAUZ, CALCEXO, KAL-
CETO; KAUS, KACUR-
CIS; CALZ, CAUS,
CHAUZ; CHAUCIS, GAU-
GES; CAUCI, CURCES;
CURLI, CHAWORTH—

Calz, Gilb. (1112)326

„ Gilb. fil Gocelin (1113)
326

Calz, Matilde, 7 J , 167

„ Robert, 354-8 ; (13H. II.)
109 dis, no, 113; (1198)

388.391
Calz, Robert, 305, 324 (1139) ;
(3 II. II.) 103; (17 H. II.)

"3
Amicia, his wife

Robert, his son

Cauz, Alex. (1226) 326

„ Alice, sister of Robt.

(Certif.) 331-337
Cauz, Galf (Ceriif.) 337

„ John (1112)326, 347-358;

(Bliburc) 326
Cauz, Maud, 122
Chauz, Matilde, 7 H. 13, 189-90

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Calceto, Matilde, wo. (5 J.) i6i ;

(6 J.) 167,328; (8 J.) 171;

(2 H. 111)405, 406 bis\ (25

H. III.) 210; Kauz (3 H.

III.) 184; (4 H. III.) 186;

(5 H. Ill,) 187; Kalceto (5

H. III.) 188
Cauz, Robt. (Certif.) 322; 315

(II 12); 326, 388, 391 ; R.

(tenant of Robert de Albini)

332
Cauz, Robt.,In wardine( 1 187) 326
Lucia, his wife
Alex., his brother
Cauz, Robert

Matilde Basset, his widow,

33H. 3, 325
Cauz, Robt. (7 H. II.) 105-6-

7 bis, 108; Kacurds (3

H. III.) 185
Cauz, Robt. de, 31 H. I, 96-98

„ Walter, 31 H. i, 96
CHAVVORTH, FAM., 331
Chaworth, Musters, Mrs., 353,

354, 355
CHAWORTH, VISCOUNT,

354
Cadurcis, Pagan, 28 ; 29 E. i,

257
Cadurcis, Patric, Barony, 442 ;

27 H. 3, 442

Chaworth, Robt., 14 J., 397
„ Thos., 333; (22 H.
III.) 460-1; (27 H. III.) 436;
(32 H. III.) 216 (21 E. 1.);
481; (24 E. I.) 253; 125
E. I.) 254; (30 E. I.) 470;
(31 E. I.) 260; (34 E. I.)
263; (4 E. 11.) 464; (20
E. 111.) 475; (13 H. IV.)
483 ; (10 H. VI.) 496

Chawarcis, Wm. (21 H. III.)
418-21 ; (15 H. III.) 201

Chaurc, Wm., 28 H. 2, 128

Cauceis, Geoffry (1205) ^33

Chaucis, Robt. (1088) 323 ;
(II 12) 323; (Certif.) 305;
(14 H. II.) 109; (21 H. II.)
118; (13 J.) 178; (16 J.)
181-2; (4 H. III.) 186; (8
H. III.) 190-2; (13 H. III.)
198-9 ; (14 H. III.) 200 ; (15
H. HI.) 202; (30 H. III.)
«4 ; (43 H. III.) 228 ; (7 E.
•I.) 241 ; (15 h. I.) 247 ; Robt.
Mariihnm, 336 ; Robi. fil Wm.
(6 J.) 162

Chaucis, Thos. (26 ti. III.) 211;
(32 H. III.)2i6; (39 H. III.)
223

Chaucis, W^m. (28 H. II.) 373,

358; (I J.) 147; (2 J.) i5«;

(3 JO 153; (4 J.) '55; (5 J-)
160; (17 J.) 170; (33 H.

III.) 217

n

11

Chaucis, Wm. fil Robt., 14

H. 3, 332
Curcis, of Devonshire, 354
Curci = Cauz, 322

„ Alice fil Wm., 23 H. 3,

334
Curci, Alice ux Warin, fitz

Gerald, 330

Curci, John, 334

Jordan, 334

John, Devons, c. R. 1, 334

Rich, c. H. I, 330-3

Robt. (1102) 322

Cauci, Simon (1163) 329

Philip de Kime, his son ?

Curcio, Walters, widow, 9 J.,

174
Curci, Wm., Justice of Ireland,

H. 2, 334
Curci, Wm., Devons., R. I, 334

„ Wm.(H. II.)277; mother

of (II H. II.) 107
Chause, Jo. de la, of Walesby,

ZiZ. 347, 358
Wm., his brother

Curli (qy. Curci) 329

„ Robt., 329 bis
Cemeter, Henr, 10 H. 3, 195

„ Wm., II J., 175
Ceresi (see Cressij
Cestrise, Const., 4 John, 156 bis
Chacecapel, Kubt. (2 J.) 149;

(6 J.) 162 (See Sachevcrel)
Chaddesdon, Henry (9 H. 3)

193 ; (24 E. I.) 253
Chaddesdon, Jo., Bailiff of

Derby, 25 E. i, 254
Chaddesdon, Thos. (34 H. III.)

218; (38 H. III.) 221
Chaddesdon, Thos. fil Galf, 13

E. I, 245
Chaddesdon, Wm. (5 H. III.)

187 ; (10 H. III.) 201 ; (6 H.

VI.) 490
Chaddington, Hy., 36 H. 3, 220
Chadlhorpe, Hy., 55 H. 3, 236
(Jharciu, Robt., 12 J., 177
Chaginea, Rich fil Rich, 31 H.

2, 131
Char run, Wischard le, 4 E. I,

239
Chamberlain, Rich, 13 E. 1,246

Chamberleng, Walt., 9 E. I, 242

Chambre, Henry, 26 E. I, 254

Hugh, II E. 2,453

Chambleng, 15 H. 2, 11 1

Chams, Thomas, 13 £. i, 245

Champenys, Hugo" (27 H. III.)

427 ; (34 H. III.) 218

Champeneis, Rad, 12 H. 3, 197

„ Robt. (21 E. l.)

252 ; (II E. II.) 452

Champion, John, 44 H. 3, 230

„ Wm., 46 H. 3, 230

Chandeler, Wm. le, i E. i, 237

Chandos, John (27 H. III.) 444-

5 ; (30 E. I.) 477 ; (34 E. I.)

262 ; fil Edward (20 E. III.)

475 ; (20 E. III.) 486
Chandos, Wm., 20 E. 3, 493
Chapelayn, Galf, 55 H. 3, 236
Chapman, John, 10 H. 6, 507 •
„ Richard (Dronfield)

(21 E. I.) 481
Chapman, Robert, 12 H. 3, 197

„ Wm., 43 n. 3,227

Charewell, John, 32 E. i, 261
ChasteUm, Alic, 13 J. 178
Chasteleyn, Wm., 31 E. i, 260
Chator, John, 6 H. 6, 495
Chaudel, Wm., Devons., 334
Chavendes, Hy., 14 E. i, 246
Chedlei, Galf, 27 E. i, 255
Chelardeston, Jo. fil Wm. (14 H.

HI.) 201 ; t20 H. HI.) 217
Chelardeston, Wm. (30 E. I.)

470 ; (33 E. r.) 262
Johanna, his wife „
Cheleworth, Galf (Certif.) 321
Chepman, Alice, 9 J., 173
Chernac, John, 10 H. 6, 498
Cheshire, Henry, 10 H. 6, 507
Chester, Bishop of, 25, 33, 69
CHESTER, BARONY OF,

442-5-6 ; (30 E. I.) 469 ; (21

E. III.) 474 ; (6 H. Vi.) 486
Chester, Abbot, 27 H. 3, 434
CHESTER, EARL OF, (1198)

388; (4 J.) 155; (6 J.) 165;

(7 J.) 170; (14 J.) 402; (2 H.

Ill) 406; (8 H. III.) 191 ;

(17 H. HI.) 204 ; (27 H. III.)

444
Chester, Countess, 2 H. 3, 408

,, ,, Ciemencia,

27 H. 3, 434

Chester, Hugh, Earl, 25, 35, 68,

69-96, 300-301, 352-385

Matilde, his Countess, 300

Chester, Maud, Countess (1198)

338
Chester, Peter, 12 E. I, 244

„ Constab, 5 J- , 160, 390

,, John, constable, 5 J.,

159, 332

„ Roger, const., 2 J., 148
Chesterbir, Wm., ii E. 2, 454
CHESTERFIELD, EARLS

OF, 284
Chesterfield, Hugh fil Roger, 2

J-» 149
Cliestertield, Pagan (17 H. IL)

112, 113; (18 H. H.) 113
Chesterfield, Susan, 2 [., 148
Chevercourt, Jordan (Ceitif.) 335
„ Letitia, 1811.3,205

,, Ralf, Carlton, 11

H. 2, 335
Chevercourt, Robt., 6 J., 162^
391

524

Chevcrcourt, Robt. (5 J.) 160 ;

(6 J.) 166; (3H. III.) 184
Cheze, Pctronille (ux Oliver Ave-

nel) H. 2f 297
Cheisnei, Wm. (Certif.) 308
Cheineito, Emma, 5 J., 158
Chetel, 31, 36, 42, 48, tgr. 50-1
Chicn, Wm. le, 6 H. 3, iSg
Child wick, Galf, 46 11. 3, 231
Chilwelli Gerv. fil Gerv., 43 11.

3. "7
Chiichini, Robt., 12 H. 2, 108

Chisworth, 307

Cholwic, Reg., 15 H. 3, 201

(See Col wye)

Cistercian Monks, 125

Clacwell, 21 E. 3, 480

Clapole, Galf, 337

Ralf (Certif.) 337

Clapwell, Thos., 13 E. i, 246

Clare, Gilbert de, 2 H. 3, 40c

Clarel, Johes (4 H. III.) 187 ;

(23 E. I.) 252

Claw, Wm., 4 J., 154

Claworde, Ade, 4 H. 3, 187

Claworth, Hugh, 17 J., 183

„ Robt. fil Jo., 48 H. 3,

232

Claworth, Thos., 12 E. i, 245

„ Walter, 10 H. 3, 194

„ Adam fil Jo., 10 H. 3,

194
Claworth, Wm., 6 J., 163

Clay, Robt, Dunham, 1 1 E. 2,

452
Cleys, Thos., 11 E. 2, 454

Cledrow, Rich., 13 11. 4, 483

Clerk, Amiciaux Rog., 44 H. 3,

229

Clerk, Amicia, wo. of Robert,

45 "• 3» 230
Clerk, Gervase le. Thorn hill, 25

E. I, 254

Felice, his wife „
Clerk, Henry ( Yolgreve) 10 H. 6,

500
Clerk, John, 11 E. 2, 452

„ Robt., Cogham, 26 H. 3,

231

Clerk, Thos. Grelton, 13 E. I,

246
Clement, Rad, 14 H. 3, 199
Cley, Hy., Derby, 22 H. 3, 208
CliflF, Wm. 28 E. I, 258
Clifford, Magr. Will, 50 H. 3, 234
Clifford, Walter, 14 J., 398

„ Wm., 14 J., 180
Clifton, Gervase (3 H. III.)

184; (8 J.) 171 ; (II J.)

175; fi2j.) 176; (4H. Hf.)

186 ; (6 H. III.) 188 ; (33 H.

III.) 217 ; (8-13 E. I.) (sheriff.

242; (17 E. I.) 249; (23 E.

I.) 252; (31 E.I.) 260; (6H.

VI.) 495 (See Clistori)

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Clifton,Cecilia fil Gervase, widow
of Roger Cressi (c. H. II.)

315; (3J-) 152^".
Clifton, Simon, Wirksworlh (21

E. I.) 252; (II E. II.) 452

Cliftoi), Warin, 4 H. 3, 186

Clipston, Herbert of, 31 H. 2,

130

Clipston, Wm. fil. Robt., 12 J.,

177

Clipston, Ranulf, 31 H. 2, 130

„ Roger de, 12 H. 2, 108

„ Wm. fil Wm., 4 E. I,

•239
Clinton, Geoffry (31 H. I.) 96 ;

("33)323
Clinton, John, c. H. 6, 495

Hy., 21 H. 2, 117

Glottis, Regin, 32 H. 3, 216

Clou, Kobt. de, 28 E. I, 258

Clou de Fer, Ralf, 21 H. 2, 117

Clough, Thorn, 10 H. 6, 501

Clowes, Roger, 43 H. 3, 22*7

Clumber^ Lambert, 12 H. 2, 108

„ Peter, 12 E. I, 245

Clynton, Thos., 6 H. 6, 490

Clypston, Peter, 11 E. 2, 454

Clyve, Hy., 10 H.'3, 195

Cnapetorp, Ralf, 43 H. 3, 226

Cneshale, Turchel, 22 H. 2, 120

Cnut, 66, 401

Cocksay, Walter, 10 H. 6, 511

Coddinc, Ralf, bro. Wm., H. 2,

290
Coddinc, Robt., bro. Wm., H. 2,

290
Coddinc, Wm., H. 2, 289
Codham, Henry, 330
Codington, Hy., 17 H. 3, 204

Wm. (35 H. II.) 135 ;

(c. 22 H. III.) 459
Coister, Ailwin, 18 H. 2, 115
Cokayne, John (13 II. IV.) 483 ;

(6 H. VI.) 490; (lo H. VI.)

499-509
Cokayne, George, lo H. 6, 509

Coke, Cucus, Cook —

Coke, Gilbert de Linton, 15 H.

2, III
Coke, Henry, 10 II. 6, 504

„ John (6 H. III.) 483; of

Docmanton (21 E. III.) 480
Coke, Rich, 10 H. 6, 501

„ Step (27 H. HI.) 428;

(34 H. in.) 218
Coke, Thomas, 6 11. 6, 490
Cokere, John, 39 H. 3, 224
Cokefield, Agatha, 2 H. 3, 407
„ Adam, 6 J., 164
„ John (21 H. III.) 423;

'40 H. III.) 230 ; (6 E. II.> 468
Cokefield, Robert (18 H. III.)

205 ; (27 H. III.) 4461 (10

H. VL) 510
Cokefield, Roger, 21 H. 3, 416

Cockeril, Adam, 58 E. I, 258
Cokesend, Robert, 40 H. 3, 231
Coly, Thos., 48 H. 3, 232
Cola, 36, 43
Colle, 35, 48, 58

„ Robt., Ilalam, 14 H. 3,

199
Cole (see Cola, 37)
Coldhus, Rich, 44 H. 3, 250

Adam, his son, t'd.
Colebrand, Rad, Radford, 32 H.

3,216
Colgrines, 48
Coleston, Rad fil Rad, 40 H. 3,

224
Coliston, Rad, 44 H. 3, 229
Colston, Wm. fil Galf, 2 J., 148

„ Wm., 46 H. 3, 231
Colfoar, Robt., 13 H. 3, 196
Colier, Rich fil Ralf, 46 H. 3,

231
Colier, Roger, 46 H. 3, 231
Coleworth, Wm., 25 H. 3, 211
Coliinc, 43

Colling, Ingram, 30 H. 3, 215
„ Robt. fil, 5 H. 3, 187
Roger, 9 H. 3, 193
Collingbam, Hugo, 11 E. 1,244
Robt. (14 H. III.)

202 ; (43 H. HI.) 227
Collingham, Wm., 23 E. i, 253
Collins, Peerage blunders, 299
Colemere, John, 20 H. 3, 207
Coin, 28, 47, 68
Colt, Walter, a Judge, 458
Columbel, Hugh, 14 H. 3, 201
„ John, Derley, 10 H. 6,

499 ; Stavely, td.
Columbel, Thomas, 10 H. 6, 506
Coleville, Ph., 18 E. i, 250
Colville, Ric, 5J., I59

„ Wm. (23 H. II.) 122 ;

(7 J.) 177
Colwic, Philip (set. 40. 26 H.

IH.) ; Presbiter (37 H. III.)

221

Colwic, Regl. (1 198) 3^ ; (5 JO

159; (6 J.) 164; (14 J.) 296;

(2 H. IIL) 393, 406 ; (21 H.

m.) 413

Colwic, Rc^er, 27 H. 3, 427-36
„ Wm., 21 H. 2, 382,415

Wm. fil Philip, 4 t\',

239
Colwic, Wm., 21 H. 2, 118

Wm. fil Odo, 48 H. 3,

233
Colwic, Hugh Propositus, rJ.

,, Wm., 21 E. I, 252
Colwyn, 392

Colwatton, John, 22 H. 2, I19
Combremara, Monks of, 305
Cone^rave, Wm., II E. 2, 455
Coningsby, Simon fil Ralf, 21

H. 3, 463 (see Kime)

INDEX OF PERSONS.

52s

Congesdon, Hy., Chelmarton,

11 E. 2, 452
Congesdon, Ralf, ii E. 2, 454
Conquest, John, 22 H. 3, 460
Constable, RoI.ert, 29 H. 2, 129
Constant ine « Cotestin
Constantine, Geoffry, 339, 348,

350» 357 ; 2 H. 3, 410
Constantine, Geoffrey, wife of,

29 H. 2, 129
Constantine, John, 10 H. 6, 510
„ Jordan,2i H.3,420

„ Robt. fil Robt., E.

h3S7
Constantine, Walter, Bishop of

Line, fV/. 130
Constantine, Wm. fil Wm., 27

H. 3, 438
Corbin, Hy. (1198) 3^9 ; ('4 J.)

399; Carlton (18 H. III.)

Corban, Hy., Derlcton, 3 H. 3,

Corbyn, Ralf, 48 H. 3, 232

Matilde, his wife
Corfier, Ralf, 7 J., 170
Corhal, Robt., 21 H. 3, 424
Cormcrye, Peter, 44 H. 3, 230
Cormesyes, Robt., Esseburn (16

H. 3) 201
Cormet, Hy., 5 E. I, 240
Corner, Agnes (ii J.) 176; (12

J.) id.
Comer, Augustine (6 J.) 161 ;

(13 H. III.) 196-7
Corner, John, Bailiff of Derb.,

^iV., 16 E. I,- 249
Comer, John de la, Derby, 4

E. I, 239
Corner, Wm. (16 J.) 180 ; (13

H. III.) 196; (46 H. III.)

230 ; Notts. (3 H. III.) 183 ;

Senr. (9 J.) 173 ; Junr., td,
Comhill, Elie, 7 J., 167

R., Justice, 6 J., 162
Richard, 7 H. 2, 105
Fit2 Wm. Robt. (de

Cotgravej, 31 H. 2, 131
Cortinstock, Alex. (3 H. III.)

184; (4H. III.) 187
Cortinstock, Jo. fil Hugh, 20

£. I, 251
Cortinstcck, John (1278) 320

Philip (21 H. III.)

420; (27 H. III.) 442
Cortinstock, Robt. fil Andrew

(1 147) 320
Cortinstock, Roger (Cerlif.) 320
Corvaserius, Robert, Esseborn,

12 H. 3, 197

Coshall, Robt., 21 H. 3, 417
Costo Falconer (2 H. II.) 106-

8; (9 J.) 172; (15 J-) 146
Coslo of Hucknal, 27 H. II., 127
(see Fil coste)

99

Costo, Will fil, Hucknal (1198)

383
Coston, Roger, 21 H. 3, 415

Cotci, Hugh (5 J.) 158 ; fil

Wm. (2 H. III.) 393-4 ^is,
Cotci, Rohesia, id,
Coiel, TarnQS, 10 H. 6, 501
„ John, 10 H. 6, scis
„ Ralf fil Henry (24 E. I.)
253 ; 25 E. I.) 254
Cotel, Robert, 10 H. 6, 499
Coieril, Henrv, 1 1 £.2, 452-4
„ Rad (29 E. I.; 258; (31
E. I.) 260
Coteril, Robert, 10 H. 6, 501
„ Roger, 28 E. i, 258
„ Wm., 29 E. I, 258
Cotgrave, Havise, 4 II. 2, 104
Henry (21 H. III.)
415 ; (27 E. I.) 255
Alice, his wife, fil Botelsford „
Cotgrave, Rad fil Rad, 16 H. 3,

203
Cotton, John (6 H. VI.) 492 ;

(10 H. VI.) (Ridware) 562
Cotun, John fil Henry, 14 E. I,

246
Cotun, Rich, 29 £. I, 259
Coveland, Nic, 13 E. i, 245
Coverham, Stephen, 14 E. i, 246
Coudray, Fulc, 36 H. 3, 220
„ Henry, 13 E. i, 245
Courtney, Raynold, 297 ^
Cox, Dr. J. Charles, 282-7
Cragg, Wm., 1 1 E. 2, 452
Crasso, Rich, 23 H. 2, 122
Creasore, John, 33 E. i, 261
Sibell.1, his wife „

Creddon, Wm. (1226) 326
Credling, Adam, 14 H. 3, 210
Adam, H. 3, 339, and
Alice, „

Alice, 12 H. 3, 195
Crepping, Robt., 40 H. 3, 255
Cressele, Robt., 4 E. i, 239
Cressi, Adam (Certif.) 318
Alexr. (Certif.) 315
Hugh, 21 H. 2, 117
Joan, Wandesley, ux
Wm., 356
Cressi, Kalf, 1 1 E. 2, 452
„ Rich, 33 E. I, 391
„ Robt. (22 H. III.) 208 ;
(14 H. III.) 199
Cressi, Roger, 316 ; (21 H. III.)
419-21

Isabella, his wife
Cressi, Roger (died 3 J.) 3^5

Cecilia, his wife
Cressi, Wm. (3 J.) 152 ; (4 J.)
156; (5 J.) 160; (6 J.) 162;
(9 H. III.) 410; (13 H. III.)
198 ; (21 H. III.) 419; (27
II. III.) 436; (40 H. HI.)
231 ; (I E. I.) 238

11

»»

n

»}

>i

i»

Cressi, Wm., of Markham, 311
Cressi, Wm. fil Roger, 3 J., 315
Cressinghani, Hugo, 21 £. i,

252
Creswell, Petronella, 34 H. 3, 319

Sarah, her sister
Creveceur, Daniel (Certif.) 335
„ Hugo, 13 E. I, 246

Robt., 7 J., 167
Crewker (see Crewles)
Crewles, Jo., 10 H. 6, 511
Cfeye, Sim. fil Sim., 8 E. i, 242
Ciich, Robt., Hocreton, 48 H.

3,232
Croc, Arthur, 18 H. 2, 115
Rich., id
Robert, do.
Walter (7 H. III.) 189;

(21 H. III.) 420
Croc, Will, 21 H. 3, 420
Crogan, Peter, 14 H. 3, 199
Crois, Robert, 9 H. 3, 193
Croke, Roger, 46 H. 3, 231
Crokeston, Robert, 22 H. 3, 1 19
Crokehora, Kol^rt (55 H. IH.)

236; (I E. 1.) 237
Croom, Wm., 12 J., 177
Crophill, Robt. fil John, 48 H.

3, 232
Crosswell, Peter, 12 H. 2. 108
Croxton, Abb, 294 ; (6 H. VI.)

496
Croxton, John fil Rich, 43 H. 3,,

227
Crowell (see Trowell) 2 H. 3,

393
Croy, Laur, 5 H. 3, 188

Croys, Simon, London, 27 £.1,

255
Cruce, Jo. (R. I.) 387 ; (14 J.)

402 ; (16 J.) 182
Cruce, Robert de, 12 H. 2, ic8

„ Wm., 37 H. 3, 221
Cruch, Roger, 27 H. 3, 439
Cruise, Wm., 32 H. 3, 216
Cruker, Wm. (20 E. III.) 475 ;

(6 H. VI.) 488
Crumford, John, 48 H. 3, 232

Alice, his wife
Crumford, l)na, 13 H. 4, 483
„ John, 12 E. I, 245
Crumbwell, John (34 E. I.) 262 ;

(4 E. II.) 464-5
Crumbwell, Ralf (24 H. II.) 123 ;

(22 H. n.) 119; (27 H. II.)

127 ; (34 H. II.) 135 ; (3 II.

III.) 189; (8 U. III.) 190;

(21 H. 111.) 459 ; (25 H. J II.)

210 ; (27 H. III.) 432.42 ;

(44 H. III.) 229 ; (48 H. III.)

233 ; (10 E. I.) 243 ; (30 E.

I.) 470; (6 E. II.) 468; (20

E. III.) 486; (13 H. IV.) 483;

(6 H. VI.) 485 ; (10 H. VJ.)

496 biSy 504

526

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Crumbwell, Ralf fil Hugh, H. 2,

315
Crumbwell, Rad, 38 H. 3, 221

Extranea, his mother

Crumbwelli Wm., 38 H. 3, 222

„ Robt., 3 H. 3, 185

Cubbcle, Hy., 10 H. 3, 194

„ Thos., 10 H. 6, 506

Culling, Alexr., 34 H. 3, 217

Cully, Wm., 53 H. 3, 235

Cutnbrai, Alured, 31 H. 2, ^i

Cumberland, Johanna, y H- 4y

483
Cundy, Robt., 348

Cuniegeston, Hy. (Certif.) 305

Cunisheved, Hugo, 30 H. 3, 215

Cupe, Wm., 45 H. 3, 231

Cupere, Adam fil Hugo, 1 1 E. 2,

452
Cupere, Henry Ic, 40 H. 3, 225

„ John, 1 1 E. 2, 454
Curcel, Hugo, H. 2, 277
Curtenei, Hubert (Certif.) 305

Stephen, his nephew
Curtenai, Wm., 33 H. 3, 217
Curtenei = Curcun (qy.) 305
CURTON, CURSON, CUR-
CUN, CURZON—
Curzon, Engelard, 38 H. 3, 221
„ Henry, 1 1 £. 2, 452
„ John (26 H. H.) 125 ;
(21 E. I.) 481; (13 H. IV.)
483 ; (6 H. VI.) 486-90 ; (10
H. VI.) 490-502-4-10
Curzon, Rad (27 H. III.) 445 ;

(30 E. I.) 472
Curzon, Rich (Certif.) 282 ; (8

J.) 171; (9 J.) 174; (14 J.)
296 ; (22 H. HI.) 462 ; (48

H. III.) 233 ; (7 E. I.) 241 ;

Robert, his son, 23 H. 2, 282
Curzon, Rich fil Henry (31 H.

III.) 215 ; (32 H. HI.) 216
Curzon, Robt. (H. II.) 289 ; (23

H. II.) 122 ; (T. de N.) 282 ;

(24 H. III.) 210 ; (27 H. III.)

445; (35 H. III.) 219
Curzon, Roger, grandson of

Ralf (20 E. III.) 475 ; (20 E.

III.) 486
Curzon, Stephen, 6 II. 6/ 493
Curzon, Wm., of Croxall, 35 II.

3,219
Curzon, Tom (8 J.) 172 ; (9 J.)
174; (T. de N.) 282; (27 H.
III.) 444; (20 £. III.) 486;
(10 H. VI.) 502-8; fil Wm.
(20 E. III.) 476; Wm. (30 E.

I.) 470; (13 H. IV.) 483; (6

H. VI.) 490
Cusincton, Nic, 26 H. 3, 21 1
Cut, Robert, 34 H. 2, 135

„ Will, 4 H. 2, 103
Cyvill, Adam, 35 II. 3, 219
Cywe, Magr. Gilb., 48 H. 3, 282

•Dabridgecourt, John Chev., 13

H. 4, 483
pabye, Thos., 6 H. 6, 493
Daft, Robert (21 H. III.) 415-7-

24-57 ; (21 E. I.) 251
Matilde, his wife „
Daft, Robert, 53 H. j, 235

Cecile, hii» wife
Daft, Wm., 55 H. 3, 237
I^aggel, John, 13 E. I, 246
Dale, Abbot (21 H. HI.) 416-23 ;

(27 H. III.) 440-6 ; (34 H.

III.) 218; (II E. II.) 456
Damartin,. Manassah, c. H. 2,

275
Dammes, Wm., 10 H. 6, 506
Damyot, Nich, 31 E. I, 260
Daniel = Danet, 336

„ Matilde, 4 E. I, 336

„ Rich. (46 H. III.) 231 ;

(53 H. III.) 234; (28 E. I.)

257 ; (29 E. I.) 259
Daniel, Rich fil Wm., 28 H. 3,

213
Daniel, Rico, 34 E. I, 262

Johanna, his wife
Daniel, Robert (Certif.) 336

„ Thomas, 14 E. I, 247

„ Thos., Ashbourne, 28 E.

1,257
Daniel, Wm., 28 H. 3, 212

Danesia, Regl., H. 2, 289

Daneston, Henry, 7 J., 168

Dankerville, H., c. H. 2, 289

Dankyman, Wm., 21 H. 3, 480

Dannett, Horenta, widow of

Ralf, 53 H. 3, 235
Dannet, Thos., 13 E. i, 245
Darcy, Dna, 13 H. 4, 483

„ John (20 E. III.) 475-6

„ John fil John (21 E. III.)

481 ; (6 H. VI.) 486
Darcy, Norman, 10 E. I, 244

„ Philip, 29 H. 3, 213

„ Ralf, his brother, 10 £.

1,244
Darcy, Roger (23 E. I.) 252;

(26 E. I.) 254
Darel Sir Wm.,4 E. I, 239
Daubion, Jo., 39 H. 3, 223
Daudely, Jas., 6 H. 6, 485
David the Jew, 5 J., 157
Davidsville, Rich, 31 H. i,

96
Davy, Hy., Magr., 20 E. 3,

493
Dawson, Nich, 10 H. 6, 507

„ Thos., 10 H. 6, 508

Dean, Ellas the, 3 T., 153

DEINCOURT, EINCOURT,

EINCURIA,HEINCOURT,

AINCOURT, QY. FAN-

COURT—
Eincourt, Annora (21 H. III.)

420

Eincourt, Edmund (22 H. III.)
461 ; (7 E. I.) 241 ; (12 E, I.)
244 ; (15 E. I.) 248; (18 E. I.)
250 ; (26 E. I.) 255 ; (30 E. I.)
470.5; (4 E. II.) 464

Eincourt, Elisia (13 H. IV.) 484 ;
(10 H. VI.) 496

Deincourt, Ha vise, wo. of John,
53 H. 3, 235

Aincourt, John (15 H. II.) iii ;
(22 H. II.) 119; (3 J.) 153;
(4 J.) 155; (5 J.) 159-60; (6 J.)

164; (7 JO 170; ("J.) 175;
(13 JO 178; (14 JO 292, 399;
(16 J.) 181; (3H. III.) 185;
(8 H. III.) 191 ; (12 H. III.)
195; (13 H. III.) 198; (14

H. III.) 200; (15 H. mo

202; (17 H. III.) 204; (21
H. III.) 418; (22 H. III.)
461 ; (29 H. III.) 213 ; (30
H. III.) 214; (32 H. III.)
216; (38 H. III.) 222; (39
H. III.) 223 ; (29 E. I.) 259 ;
(30 E. I.) 470-5 ; (33 E. I.)
261 ; (6 E. II.) 468

Eincourt, John fil Edmd., 13
H. 3, 228

Deincourt, Jo. fil Oliver, 31 H.

3,215
Heincourt, Jo., 391
Aincourt, Isabella, 33 H. 3, 217
Deincourt, Matilde, wo. of Ralf,

340
Aincourt, Oliver (14 J.) 403 ; (5
H. III.) 187; (20 H. mo 207;
(21 H. III.) 417-8, and Ma-
tilde, his wife ; (27 H. HI.)
32, 38-9, 45; (29 H. III.) 213;
heirs, 161
Aincourt, Half, 341
Deincourt, Robt., 340 ; ^24 H.
III.) 210; (27 H. III.) 438-9
Aincourt, Robert, (3 H. III.) 184

Havis, his wife, id,

Aincourt, Roger, (22 H. II.) 1 19 ;

(14 J.) 296; (7 H. III.) 439

ins,; (22 H. III.) 209; (35

H. III.) 220 (1252) 351

Deincourt, Roger (Morton) 5 H.

3,188
Deincourt, Walter de, 307, 25,

53, 69 dis.y 348
Deincourt, Wra. (21 E. I.) 482 ;

(20 E. III.) 475-6
Dek, John, 16 E. i, 249
Deneby, Wm., 12 H. 3, 197
Denest, Hy., 25 H. 2, 124
DENMAN, The Lord Chief

Justice, 335
Denman, Nicolas, 335
Denyas, Walter, 1 1 E. 2, 454
DERBY, THE EARL, Barony,

444
Derby, Men of, i E. I, 237

INDEX OF PERSONS.

527

DERBY, EARL OF, 53 H. 3,

234
DERBY, EARL OF, 39 H. 3,

301, of the House of Ferrars
DERBY, EARL OF, of the
House of Stanley, 333, 384 ;
Glover's mistakes as to the
origin of the family, id.
DERBY, WM. COM, 2 J., 148
Adam, 40 H. 3, 225
Alured, 5 R., 136
Augustine, 292
Cecilia, daughter of Robt.
(1176)350
Derby, Guda, wife of Robert,

350
Derby, Hugh fil Nicolas, 22 H.

3,218
Derby, Hugo fil Ralf (46 H.

in.) 225; (50 H. in.) 233
Derby, Hugo fil Philip, 9 H. 3,

193
Derby, Hugo fil Wm., 22 H. 3,

23
Derby, Ysold, wo. of Philip,

f >

I J, 147
erby.

Derby, Letiiia fil Nigel fil Bald-

wyn, 350
Derby, Nicol fil Aldred, 22 H.

3,208

Henry, his brother, id.
Derby, Nic fil Matilde, 39 H. 3,

223
Derby, Peter (15 J.) 145; (17 J.)

182; (20 H. IIL)207;(4j.)

157 ; Richard, bail for him,

id.
Derby, Peter fil Wm., 12 J.,

X77
Derby, Petronilla fil Peter, 292

„ Philip, Dean of (35 H.

n.) 135; (4 J) 157

Derby, Magr. Robert (l 176) 350 ;

(28 H. n.) 128; (14 H. IIL).

200; (40 H. III.) 222; fil

Goda (1176) 292, 350
Derby, Roger, 14 H. 3, 201

„ Roger (Canon) 33 H. 2,

134
Derby, Walchelin, H. 2, 3<o

„ Walter fil Thos., 22 H.

3,208

Derby, Wm. (i J.) 147 ; ('4 H.
IIL) 200

Derby, Wm. fil Alan, 13 H. z,
109

Derby, Wm. fil Peter (27 H.
in.) 427; (34 H. III.) 218

Derley, Abbot (8 J.) 172; (14
J.) 400 ; (21 H. III.) 416-22-
3; (22 H. in.) 459-61 ; (27
H. IIL) 448; (32 H. in.)
216 ; (30 E. I.) 470-2; (II
E. n.)456;(2oE. III.) 475:
(6 11. VL)487

Derley, Andrew, 33 H. 3, 217
„ Henry,Abbot(I275) 349'
„ Hy. fil Hy.,43H. 3,227
,, John, bro. of Robert,
31 E. I, 260

Derley, Nich, 5 E. i, 240

,, Ralf, Abbot (1229) 47,

356
Dferley. Rolierl (28 H. II.) 128 ;

(55 H. IIL) 235
Derley, Wm., Abbot, 350-67 >

44 H. 3, 230
Derley, Wm., under-sheriff, 19

H. 3, 206
Derling, Adam fil Wm., 7 E. I,

241
Deredeston, Roger, 55 H. 3, 237
Derisburc, Hy., 18 H. 3, 205
Derington, Walter (Certif.) 314
Dernston, Hy., 6 J., 302
Dethic, Galf (46 H. III.) 231 ;

(53H. IIL)235;(2oE. in.)

474-5-86
Dei hie, John (20 E. III.) 486 ;

(10 H. VL)504
Dethic, Robert (21 H. III.) 416 ;

(27 H. IIL 448; (5 E. L)

254; (27 E. L) 255; (29 E.

L) 258; (30 E. L) 470-2;

(20E. IIL)475;(i3H. IV.)

484
Dethic, Roger, 10 H. 6, 503
„ Thos., 6 H. 6, 490-2-3
„ Will, 20 E. 3, 485
Deyne, John, 10 H. 6, 507
Dcyvill, John (21 H. III.) 421 ;

(10 H. VL) 507
Deyvill, Nich, 14 J., 296
„ Robt., II H. 2, 107
„ Walter, ii J., 175
Dien, Yvo, 3 H. 3, 184
DIGBY, SIR JOHN, 335

Robert, 2 E. 2, 314
Sibel, his wife, id,
Walter (Certif.) 314
William, id.
Dispens, Galf (21 H. III.) 417 ;
(24 H. IIL) 210; (27 H. IIL)
442
Dispens, Hugo (18 H. IIL)

205 ; (40 H. III.) 225
Dispens, Robert, 13 J., 178

Thom. (4 J.) 156 ; (5

»»

99

,1

J.) 159; (9 J.) 173; (12 J.)

177; (13 J.) 178; (16 J.)
181 ; (7 H. IIL) 189

Dispens, Thurstan, 27 H. 3,

436-7
Dive, Extranea, 43 H. 3, 227

„ Leodgar, 10 H. 3, 194

,, John (Balderton) 5 E. i,

240

Dive, Maud fil Wm., 305

,, Matilde ux Wm., 305

Wm., 21 H. 2, u8

»,

J Docmanton, Henry, 21 E, 3,
486 (see Duck man 'on)

Docmanton, John fil John, 21
E. 3, 481

Dod, Hy., 48 H. 3, 232

Dodsworih, Roger (Salebir pedi-
gree) 345

Dodingselles, Wm. fil Wra., 20

E. 3, 475
Doget, John, 21 E. 3, 480

Dogge worth, Adam fil Hugh, I

E. I, 238
Doile, Edmund, 6 H. 6, 486
Doisnil, Walter, 2 J., 149
Doynel, Wm., 22 H. 3, 208
Doynall, Wm., 37 H. 3, 221
Dokeworth, Adam fil Hugh, 46

H. 3, 231
Dolfin, 65, /«-.

„ John, Eckinton, 10 H.

6, 496
Dolfin, Wm., Ekinton, 21 E. 3,

480
Donington, Thom fil Robt., 53

H. 3, 235
Dorset, Alexr., 12 J., 177
Douchmaler, Waller fil Humph.,

53 H. 3, 235
Dovorr, Robt., II E. 2, 455
Draicot, Marg, 14 H. 3, 201
„ Rich. (22 H. III.) 461 ;
And Matilde Wellwyk, his

wife (30 E. I.) 470
Draicot, Theobald, 4 J., 154
„ Thomas, 26 E. 3, 476
„ Wm. fil Rob, 34 H. 2

135
Drake, Robert, 31 H. 2, 131
Malger, id.
Thos., II E^ 2. 453
Draiton, Gilbert, 21 H. 3, 413
Dreiton, Peter, 15 H. 2, iii
Drayton, Wm., 26 E. i, 255
Drogo, 52

Drury, Elias, 9 E. i, 242
Dubleserjeant, Rich, 4 H. 3, 187
Dubraid, Galf de Alwaston, 20

E. I, 251
Dudington, Simon, 32 H. 3, 216
Ducknianton, Henry fil Roj^rt,

35 H. 2, 135 (see Docmanton)
Duckmanton, Hugo, 27 H. 3,

212
Duckmanton, Hugh, 46 H. 3,230

Letice, his wife „

Dufton (see Duston)

„ Wm. (12 J.) 177; (13

J.) 178 ; (14 J.) 179.80 ;

(16 J.) 182; (8H. IIL) 192;

(13 H. IIL) 198; (14 H. IIL)

200; (16 H. IIL) 202; (30

H. III.) 214.5 ; (38 H. IIL)

222 ; (40 H. IIL) 225 ; (43

H. IIL) 228; (7 E. I.) 241 ;

(15 E. L) 247

$28

INDEX OF PERSONS.

»»

«i

Dufton, Heirs of Wm., 34 H. 3,

2l8

Dugdale, on date of 1st Pipe

Roll, 17
Dun, Galf (Breylesford) 20 £. I,

Dun, Havise (3 H. II.) 103-4;

(27 H. III.) 44'?
Dun, Henry, 31 H. 3, 288

,. Hugo (31 H. III.) 288;

(II E. II.) 452
Dun, Margl. fil Rog. fil Robt.,

31 H. 3, 288
Dun, Rich le, 19 E. i, 251

,, Robert (8 H. III.) 190 ;

(27 H. III.) 444
Dun, Robt (Certif.) 287; (T.

de N.) id.
James, his son, id*
Dun, Samps (31 H. III.) 287 ;

{36 H. III.) 226
Dun, Sihella, widow of Robt.,

31 H. 3, 288
Dun, Wm. (H. II.) 289; (18

H. III.) 208
Dunolm. John (38 H. III.) 221 ;

(39 H. III.) 223
Dunham, Godric, 15 H. 2, ill

Hugh, 13 J., 179
Hugo de, 7 H. 2, 105
Ulfgirt de, 7 H. 2, 105
„ Rich fil Galf, 34 E. i,
262
Dunninc, 41, 48, 61, 65
Dunning, 47 ; (29 H. III.) 129
Dunstan, 54, 60 ; Wm. (heirs

oO (27 H. III.) 427
Dunstan, Ailmo, 5 H. 3, 188
Dunling, Thos. fil Hugh (33 E.

I.) 261 ; (II E. II.) 454
Durand, 48 H. 3, 232
Duredent, Roger (44 H. III.)

230; (12 E. I.) 245
Dureden, Nic, 9 H. 3, 193
Durham, Epis. (30 E. I.) 470;

(20 E. III.) 475
Duston, 3 H. 3, 185 (see Dufton)
Dutci, Wm., 55 H. 3, 237
Dye, Wm. fil, 27 E. I, 255
Dyk, Stephen, 10 H. 6, 488
Dyneley, Robt., 11 E. 2, 484
„ Thomas, 10 H. 6, 504

EARL EDWIN, 39, 45

EARL OF FERRARS, 13 J.,
178

EARL G., I J., 147
„ JOHN, 146
„ WALLEF, 42

EBOR, ARCHBISHOP (5 J.,)
161 ; (7 J.) 170 ; (8 H. IIL)
190

EBOR, WALTER, ARCH-
BIS HO P (sheriff ) 53 H, 3, 236

Ebor, Nich., 3 J., 154

Ecclesall, Rad (5 E. I.) 240 ; (21
E. L) 251

Ecclesall, Rol)ert, 34 E. i, 262
„ Walter, 8 J., 172

Ecclesdon. Galf (7 H. III.) 189 ;
(13 H. III.) 198; (14 H. III.)
2CO bis\ (16 H. III.) 202;
(30 H. in.) 214 ; (43 H. in.)
228; (7E. I.)24i; (15 E. I.)

247
Eccleston, Galf, 8 H. 3, 190

Ede, Rich., fil, 32 H. 3, 216

Edensor, Adam; i J., 147

Edenstowe, Reginald, 17 £. I,

249
Edenstowe, Wm. fil Rt)bt., 13 E.

1,246
Edenstowe, Wm. fil Thos., 22

H. 3, 209
Matilde, his wife, id.
Edeston, Eliz., 30 E. i, 470
Edingal, Cecelia, 22 H. 3, 209
Edmonston, Scac, 46 H. 3, 231
E<Imun(l, 66
EDMUND, brother of the King

(22 H. IIL) 461 ; (7 E. I.)

242; (15 E. L)248
Edmund, Propositus, 8 J., 171
Edmondson, Peerage blunders,

299
Edric, 37, 41, 42. 43, 57
Edricsei, Hugo, 12 H. 3, 197
Edward, 41, 67
Edwin, 26, 52, 63, 64,

65, 68; 3H.3, 183
Egton, Richard, the Parson of,

4Jm 154
Egrum, Rowland, pson., 17 E.

I, 249
Egrum, William, 7 E. I, 241
Eicring, Hy. (21 H. II.) 116;

(12 7.) 177; (21 H. III.) 418.

20
Eicring, Osbert, 4 H. 3, 1 86
Eilmer, 31 bis.
Eisford, Rich., 30 E. I, 259
Ekington, Aluric, 12 H. 2, 108
„ Rich., 34 H. 2, 135
Ekerington, John, 30 E. i, 259
Ekelington, Rich. (16 E. I.)

248; (16 E. I.) 249
Laura, his wife „

Elfag, 42, 52
Elfeg, 41

Elfin, 42, 44, 45 bis.
Elfric, 44

Elias the Dean, 6 J., 162
Elias of Brad well; 1 1 £. 2, 453
Elie, Elias fil, 2 j., 149

„ the Parson, 6 R. I, 136
Elia le Feur, i E. r, 238
Klmdon, Guy, 12 J., 176
Elmer, 40
Elington, Ivo (Pec) 41 H. 3, 226

Elmet, Galf, 6 J., 163

Elnod, 36, 63

Elric, 39, 41 ; see Alric, 42, 43,

50,62
Elton, John (fudge) 458
Eluric, 37, 38, 39
Elsi, 37

Elsi, fil Caskin, 69
Elveston, Robt., 13 H. 2, 108
Eluuine, 51
Elvinc, 48
Elwold, 42
Empingham, Reg. (20 H. II.)

116; (32 H. IL) 134
Empville, Elias, 27 H. 3, 432
Enfant, John, 43 H. 3, 227
Engain, Warner (25 H. HI.)

211; (21 H. in.) 434
Engleys, John, 43 H. 3, 226
Engeleis, Wm., 17 J., 182
Ennesore, Rich., 13 H. 3, 196
Ennishall, Thos, 20 E. 3, 476
Erchenbalde, 4 H. 2, 103
Erdeswick, Hugo, 6 H. 6, 506
Erleye, Wm. (sheriff) 23 H. 3,

209
Erleston, John, fil Ralph, 55 H.

3*236
Ernelegh, Robt., 1 1 E. 2, 454
Emhale, Gervase, 14 H. 3, 199
Rad, 14 H. 3, ^99
Rich., 22 H. 2, 119
Robert, 22 H. 3, 208
„ Wm. fil Rich., 31 H.

I, 131
Emlier, Mich (Birchlis) 11 J.,

175
Emiet, 41

Emwi, 46, 53, 66, 67
Ernuin, 63 64

Escals, Gerbod, 9 H. 2, 106
Escorceville, Wm., 16 H. 2,

112
Espelt, Saher, 10 R., 145
Espigornal, Edmund, 15 E. I,

248
Espigornal, Nic, 4 E. i, 239
Esquire, John (14 J.) 130 ; Wes-
ton (20 E. I.) 251; (II E II.)
452
Esquire, Roger (32 E. I.) 261 ;

(iiE. IL)453
Esquire, Tom (12 J.) 176; (17

J.) 182
Essarts, Wm., 12 H. 3, 197
Esse, Rich., 18 H. 2, 115
Esseby, Robt. (13 H. IIL) 198 ;

(14 H. IIL) 200; (16 H. III.)

202 ; (38 H. III.) 222 ; (43

H. IIL) 228#
Esseby, Robt. fil Wm. (6 J.)

164; (18 H. IIL) 206
Esseby, Robt., heirs of (30

H. IIL) 214-5; (7 E. L)

241 ; (15 E. I.) 247

INDEX OF PERSONS.

529

f »
f>
»»

Esseby, Wm. fil Robt. (4 J.)

155; (SJ) 159; (6 J.) 162;

(7 J.) 170; (13 J.) 178; (16

J.) 181 ; (3 H. III.) 185 J (8

H. III.) 191
Esseburn, Gilbt., 34 H. 2, 135
Esseburn, heirs of Henry, 5

E. I, 239
Esseburn, John, 12 H. 3, 196

Ralf, 350

Rich., 13 £. I, 246

Robt., 349

Essex, Roger (27 H. III.) 427 ;

(34 H. III.) 218; (36 H. III.)

220

Essover, Wm. (Piston) 5 H.- 3,

187
Estanton, Mathw., 8 J., 171
Estinur, Wm., 11 £. 2, 452
EstoD, Adam, 29 H. 2, 129
Rich ,, „

John, 6 R. I, 295
Mathw. fil Odo, 6 R. I,

295
Eston, Osbert, 24 H. 2, 123 ;

(Devon) 334
Eston, Regl. fil Henry, 32 H.

3, 216
Eston, Wm. fil Henry, id,

„ Robt. fil Waltr., 22 H. 2,

119
Eston, Walter (Certif.) 332 ; 32

H. 2, 133
Eston, William, 7 E. I, 241
Estrapge, Roger, 14 E. I, 247
Estrc, Galfr, i6 H. 3, 203
Esturrai, Will, 2 H. 3, 410
Estheut, Hy. (4 H. III.) 355 ;

(27 H. III.) 430; 34 H. III.)

219
Estweit, Walter fil Jo., 40 H.

3, 224
Estweit, Walt, (ii H II.) 107 ;

(13 H. II.) 109; (12 J.) 177;

(5 H. III.) 188; (8 H. III.)

190
Etcwell, Nic (4 J.) 157; (12

H. 3, 197
Etewell, Wm. fil Hugh, 31

H. 2, 131
Ethekin, Wm., 34 H. 2, 135
Eton = Etton

„ Arnulf, 15 H. 2,'^iii

,y Gerard, 19 E. 1, 251

„ Hy., 6 J., 164

„ Hugo, 4 H. 3, 187

„ Hugo fil Ranald, 4

H. 3, 186
Eton, John (21 H. HI.) 418-9 ;

(27 H. III.) 486
Euer, Joscelin, 32 H. 2, 132
Eustace fil Eustace, Derby, 34

4 H. 3, 218
John, his son
Isolda, his daughter

37

Eustace (Pson. Ludham) 9 J., 174
Euton, Rog. Prop., 4 J., 156
Eveband, Philip, 11 E. 2, 453
Everard, Robert, 36 H. 3, 220
Everdon, Roger, 20 E. 3, 470
Everingham (Barony) 440 ;

Adam (7 E. I.) 242 ; (4 E.

II.) 315 ; (2 E. III.) 314, 335
Everingham, Isabella (36 H.

III.) 220; (43 H. III.) 228;

(I E. I.) 237-8; (15 E. I.)

248
Everingham, Robt., 336 ; (ii J.)

175 ; (4 H. III.) 186 ; (20

H. III.) 207 ; (21 H. III.)

417-21 ; (27 H. III.) 432-40 ;

J., his wife, id, ; Robt. fil

Adam (9 £. I.) 263 ; (13

E. I.) 245
Everingham, Simon, 44 H. 3,

230
Everingham, Walter, 29 H. 3,

213
Everingham, Wm. fil Adam, 43

H. 3, 227
Everington, Adam, 48 H. 3,

232
Evermue, Alice fil Walter (27

H. III.) 431 ; (24 H. III.)

209; (26 H. III.) 211
EWE, COUNTESS, (2 H. III.)

392, 406; (8 H. III.) 192;

(12H. III.)4ii; (13 H. III.)

199; (15 H. III.) 203; (21

H. III.) 417 ; (27 H. in.)

432-4 ; (30 H. III.) 214.5 ;

(38 H. HI.) 222; (43 H.

III.) 228; (7 E. I.) 242; (15

£. I.) 248
EWE, JOHN, EARL, c H. 2,

276
Ewyas, Nich., 46 H. 3, 231
Exeter, Bishop, 8 H. 3, 191
„ Henry, Elect., 13 J.,

178
Extraneos, Galf, 13 H. 3, 196
Eykan, Wm. (Chermanton) Ii

E. 2, 453
Eyneford, Wm., 6 H. 3, 189

,, Hugo, 10 H. 6, 509

„ Nich, 10 H. 6, 501

Eyre, Rich (4 H. III.) 187;

(8 H. III.) 190
Eyre, Robt. (Padley) 10 H. 6,

500
Eyre, Robt. fil Wm. (31 E. I.)

260; (10 H. VI.) 503
Eyre, Wm. Robt. fil (Hope) (33

E. I.) 262; (10 H. VI.) 498
Eyton, John (21 E. III.) 474;

Rev. R., 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 19,

22, 23, 24, 86, 283, 324, 345
Eyvill, Ad. (32 H. III.) 216;

(43 H. III.) 228; (44 H.

III.) 229; (14 E. I.) 246

Eyvill, Gocelin, 30 E. I, 259

„ John (48 H. III.) 226;

(53 H. III.) 235; (18 E. I.)

250; (20 E. I.) 251
Eyvill, Nic (25 H. III.) 210;

(44 H. III.) 229
Eyvill, Robt. (27 H. III.) 436 :

(44 n. HI) 229; (5 E. I.)
240
Eyvill, Wm. de, Egmanton, 5
£. I, 240

Faber, Asces, Nottm., 16 H. 5,

203
Faber, Ingram, 31 H. i, 97

„ Peter (27 H. III.) 427;

(34 H. III.) 218
Faber, Richard, 7 J., 169

„ Roger, 10 H. 3, 195

„ Wm. (25 H. II.) 124;

(34 H. II.) 13s
Faleise, Gilbert de, 31 H. i, 96
„ Wm. (34 H. III.) 218;

(6 E. I.) 240 ; (Devons.) 334 ;

Geva, his wife, id,
Fancourt, Galf, (33 H. III.)

217 ; (36 H. III.) 220
Fancourt, Gerard (21 H. III.)

420; (27 H. III.) 438-45;

(32 E. I.) 260
Fancourt, Roger, i E. i, 238

Emma, his wife, 238
Fannel, Wm., 6 E. 2, 468
Farringdon, Walter, 27 H. 3,

212
Farendon, Math, fil Walt., 55

H. 3, 236
Farenton, Roger, 2 J., 149
Farndon, Wm., 11 E. 2, 453
Farington, Robt., 12 J., 178
Farnham, Robt., 30 E. i, 470
Farnfield, Wm., 33 H. 2, 134
Farwell, Robert, 6 J., 166
Faseman, Joha., 10 H. 6, 503
Faucon, Rob., II E. 2, 452
Fauconbery, Hy., 27 H. 3, 432
Fauconbridge, Eustace, 5 J.,

160
Fauconbridge, Hump. (Cuck-

ney) 19 E. I, 251
Favarches, Wm., H. 2, 276
Fawknel, Jo., 10 H. 6, 506
Fcld, Robt., 10 H. 3, 203
Felly, Prior (27 H. III.) 429 ;

(34 H. III.) 218
Fenineglay, 22 H. 2, 119
Fenton, Gilbert (16 H. III.)

203; (18 H. III.) 205
Fenton, Jo. fil Wm., 12 £. I,

245
Fenton, Juliana, wo. of WilliaHK,

12 £. I, 245

Cecileand Alice, her daughters

530

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Feral, Jo., 2 J., 149

Fcmlegh, Rich., 35 H. 3, 219

Ferendon, Roger, 21 H. 2, 118
„ Win.,21 H. 2, 118

Fenm, Henry, 40 H. 3, 225

FERRARS, DE EARL (21
H. II.) 117; (22 H. II.)
119; (1 J-) '46; (3 J.)
154; (4 J.) 155-6; (5 }•)
158-9; (6 J.) 162.3.4; (7
J.) 170; (14 J.) 179, 400;
(16 J.) 181 Wj, 182; (2 H.
III.) 4058; (3 H. III.) 185
Hs; (8H. III.) 196 f'is; (13
H. III.) 199; (14 H. III.)
200; (16 H. III.) 202 dis;
(18 H. III.) 205-6; (19 H.
III.) 204; (20 H. III.) 207;
(29 H. III.) 213 ; (30 H.
III.) 214 ter.t 215; (35 H.
III.) 220; (43 H. III.) 228,
192; (7E. I.)242; (15 E. I.)
248; (II E. II.) 4^2

Ferrars, Hy., D., 28
„ Amicia fil „

FERRARS, WM., EARL
(Certif.) 279, 282; (27 H.
m.) 434; (20 E. IIL) 486

Ferrars, i5na de Groby, 13 H.

4, 484
Ferrars, Edmund, Birmingham,

10 H. 6, 508

Ferrars, Hy., 11, 16, 25, 30, 32,

35. 36, 53, 68, 69, 87 ; 31 H.

1,97
Ferrars, Hugo (brother of the

Earl) (Hy. II.) 289; (20 E.

in.) 493
Ferrars, Petronnlla, sister of the

Earl, 16 J., 181
Ferrars, Ralf, Pleasley, 21 E.
. 3,480
Ferrars, Robt. (31 H. I.) 97;

(I H. II.) 99, 105; (i"4 50)
(2 H. IL) 101,287; (31 H.

in.) 287 ; (8 H. in.) 191 ;

(14 H. III.) 199; (50 H. III.)

234; 12 E. I.) 244, 289
Ferrars, Rob. fil Henry (1126)

290
Ferrars, Robt. fil William, 46

H. 3, 231
Ferrars, Robt., uncle of the

Earl, H. 2, 289
Ferrars, Robert, grandson of

Henry (c. 1 1 38) 280
Ferrars, ITiom, 1^4 E. I, 247
„ Wachelin (W. I.) 296,

88; (14 J-) 402
Ferrars, Wm. (Certif.) 310; (8

H. in.) 171 ; (21 H. in.)

421; (27 H. in.) 447; (29

H. in.) 213; (3< H. in.)

220 ; (15 E. I.) 248 ; of Groby
(10 H. VI.) 504

Ferrars, W., uncle of the Earl,

H. 2, 289
Ferrars, Wm., brother of the

Earl, H. 2, 289
Ferriby, Prior, ii E. 2, 455
Feure, Hy. fil Walter, 4 E. i,

239
Fifehead, Thos., Newerc, 28 H.

3,213
Fifehead, Thos., 27 H. 3, 212

„ Rich. (Certif.) 292

Filbe, Robert, Spondoh, 13 H.

3, 197 .
Filiol, Robt., Mapelbeck,48 H.

3,232
Fillngham, Reginald, 5 E. I,

240
Fillham, Hugo, 31 H. I, 97
Finch, Rich, 14 H. 3, 199

„ John, 13 H. 4, 484
Findem, Hugo, 34 H. 2, 135
„ Nic, 10 H. 6, 506.7
Finores, Robt., 44 H. 3, 229
Firetry, Galf (Certif.) 305

Maurice, his son
Fil Abraham, Aaron, 43 H. 3,

228
Fitz Adam, Henr. (5 J.) 158;

(6 J.) 162
Fitz Adam, Herbert, Snotinton,

4 H. 3, 187
Fitz Adam, Hugo, 25 E. I, 254
„ Rd., 12 J., 177

„ John, II J., 174

Fitz Ad win, Swain, 32 H. 2, 132
Fil Aesmund, Ad., 4 J., 154
Fitz Ail ward, Robert, 21 H. 2,

117
Fil Ailwin, Tom, 12 J., 177
Fitz Ailulf, Rich, 34 H. 2, 135
Fitz Aio, Wm., i J., 146
Fitz Aisulphus, John, 22 H. 2,

119
Fitz Alan, Jordan, 94 ; (3I H.

i-)335; ("33)324

Fitz Alan, Rich, H. 2, 289

Robt. (5 J.) 157 ; (9

J.) 173
Fitz Alan, Wm. fil, 3 H. 2, 109,

no

Fitz Alexr., Godfrey (4 J.) 154 ;

(6 J.) 163
Fitz Alexr., Hy., 12 J., 177

Hugo, 13 H. 3, 196
John, 10 H. 3, 194
Peter, 5 H. 3, 188
Robt., ^3 J., 179
Roger (9 H. III.)
193; (10 H. in.) 195
Fitz Alexr., Thos., 10 E. I, 243
Fil Alilich, Regl., 11 J., 175
Fitz Alice, Asketel, 19 H. 3, 207
Fitz Aldred, Hugh, 34 H. 2, 134
Fitz Alkel, Roger, 13 H. 3, 197
Emma, his wife, tW,

„
„

„

Fitz Alured, 16 H. 3, 203
Fitz Amani, Robert, 96
Fitz Amauri, Ralf, 20 H. 2, 116
Fil Amfred, Wm., 32 H. 3, 216
Fitz Amicia, Ralf, 1 1 E. 2, 452
Fil Ankel, Elias, 12 J., 177
Fil Anketin, Godfr, 46 H. 3, 231
Fitz Amulf, Wm., 4 H. 3, 187
Fitz Ascclot, Hugo, 9 H. 3, 193
Fil Ascelin, Galf, 348 ; (13 J.)

178
Fil Ascelin, Robt., 8 J., 171
Fitz Ascer, Rad, 4 H. 3, 187
Fitz Ase, Ulfkel, 22 H. 2, 121
Fitz Aveline, Robt., 22 H. 2,

121 .
Fil Augustine, John, 39 H. 3,

224
Fitz Baldric, Hugh, 7
Fitz Baldwin, 6 R. I, 136-
Fil Baldwin, Wm. (3 J.) 153 ;

(8 J.) 172
Fitz Beatrice, Roger, 16 H. 3,

203
Fiiz Beatrice, Wm., 7 J., 170
Fil Bet, Henry, 43 H. 3, 227
Fil Ben, Andrew, 55 H. 3, 236
Fitz Ben, Andrew, i E. i, 238

Cecile, his wife ,,
Fil Benesey, Alain, 35 H. 3, 220
Fil Bernard, Heward, ii J.,

176
Fitz Bernard, Simon, 2 J.) 148
Fil Botilde, Robt., 8 J., 171
Fil Brauneis, Wm., 4 J., 154
Fitz Brien, Rich., 16 H. 3, 203
Fil Britain, Galf, 40 H. 3, 225
Fil Cecil Peter, 13 J., 178
Fil Colling Wm., 14 J., 401
Fil Colun, Thos., 44 H. 3, 230
Fitz Coin, Edric, 68
FiU Coste, Hugo (15 H. IIL)

201 ; (27 H. III.) 429
Fitz Coste, Wm. (9 R. I.) 372 ;

(5 JO »58; (14 J.) 397
Fit David, Amersize fii (Lum-

bard) 20 H. 3, 207
Fitz David, Avenel, Nottm., 27

H. 3, 212
Fitz David, Moyses, 20 H. 3,

207
Fitz Drogo, Wm., 26 H. 2, 125

Fil Durand, Ralf, Gedling, 14

H. 3, 199
Fil Durand, Wm., 34 H. 2, 135
Fitz Edward, Edwin, 2 T., 148
Fitz Edwin, Rich., 25 H. 2, 134
Fil Elie, Ernald, of Radcliffe

(27 H. IIL) 428; (34 H. IIL)

215
Fiiz Emma, Thos., 392 ; Walter,

24 H. 5, 123
Fil Erchenbald, Wm,, 13 J.,

179

INDEX OF PERSONS.

531

Fitz Ernald, Hy., 3 H. 3, 185

„ Jordan, 325

Fitr Erneis (7 JO 169; (12 J.)

176; (3 H. III.) 185 ; (5H.

XII.) 188
Fil Ernulf, Henry, 9 J., I73

„ Ralf, 35 H. 3, 220

Fitz Eudo, Family of Tattersal,

341
Fitz Eudo, Ralf, 318

Fil Eudo. Wm., 348 ; (13 J.)

178; (4H. III.) 187

Fil Eudo, of Reresby, 329

Fitz Eustace, Eustace, 27 H. 3,

427
John, his son

Isolda, his daughter

Fitz Eve. Win., 18 H. 2, 115

Fitz Fabre, Galf fil (Cromwell)

25 H. 3, 210
Fil Falconer, Simon, ii J., 175
Fil Felicia, Rad, 44 H. 3, 229
Fitz Frano, John, 4 J., 157
Fulk, 63, 64

Fil Fulc, Adam, 14 J., 179
Fitz Fulc, Galf {32 H. III.)

216; (34 H. III.) 217
Fitz Fulc, Hy. (15 H. II.) iii ;

(22 H. II.) 119
Fulc, his son, id,
Fitz Fulc, H., H. 2, 289

„ Robert (26 H. II.)

125,280; (7 J.) 173; (10 H.

III.) 195 ; (17 H. III.) 204
Fitz Fulc, Sewell, 21 H. 2,

117, 280
Fil Fulc, Simon, 38 H. 3, 222
Fitz Fulc, Wm., of Sandiacre

(27 H. III.) 427 ; Hedon, (10

E. I.) 243
Fitz Galf, 6 H. 3, 189

„ Galf, N. Carlton, (46

H. III.) 230; (48 H. III.)

232
Fitz Galf, John fil Wm., 8 H. 3,

189
Fitz Galf, Ingram, Stirop, 27 H.

3,436
Fitz Galf, Matilda, widow of, 7

H. 3, 189
Fitz Galf. Ralph (Certif.) 316
Fite Galf, Robt. (Certif.) 315 ;

Notln., 31 H. 2, 131 ; of

Kirkton, 316
Fitz Galf, Robt., 10 H. 3, 195
Fitz Galf, Roger (2 J.) 148 ; (16

J.) 181 ; (15 H. III.) 183
Fitz Galf, Wm. (31 H. I.) 94.7;

(4 J.) 157; (5 J.) 161; (tj.)

171; (14JO401; (15JO145;

(17 J.) 182,330
Fil Gamel, Benedict, 12 J., 177

„ Hugh, 8 J., 171
Fitz Geremund, Ralf (Certif.)

314

Fil Geri, Stephen, 8 J.. 171
Fitz German, Hugo, 4 H. 3, 187
Fitz Ceroid, Henry, 4 H. 2, 104
„ Warin, c. H. 2,

330
Fitz Gervase, Henry, Wilford,

21 H. 3, 414
Fitz Gervase Wm., 14 H. 3, 201
Fil Gilbert, Adam, 39 H. 3, 224
Fite ., Alan fil, 4 H. 3, 186
Galf (Certif.) 316
Hy.(2iH. II.)ii8;
(36 H. II.) 135
Fitz Gilbert, Jacob, 12 H. 3,

197
Fitz Gilbert, John, 13 H. 3, 196
„ Nic, 10 H. 6, 509

Fil Gilbert, Orm, 12 J , 177
„ Thos., Bolsover, 21

E. 3» 479
Fil Gilbert, Wm., 14 J., 398
Fitz Gladwin, Rich., 31 H. 2,

131

Fil Gocelin, Eudo, 329 ; Pavon,

40 H. 3, 225
Fitz Gode, Wm. (12 E. I.) 245 ;

(II E. II.) 452
Fite Godfrey, Hy. fil, 2 J., 151

Johanna, wo. of id.
Fitz Godfrey, Robert, 5 Jo., 158
Fitz Godwin, Hugo, 2 J. 148
Fitz Godfrey, Rich. (2 J.) 148 ;

(21 H. III.) 421
Fitz Gregory, Wm., 340
Fitz Gubert, Robt., 28 H. 2,

128
Fitz Gumbold, Swan, 8 H. 3,

185
Fitz Gunild, Roger, 10 H. 3,

195
Fil Hacon, Ingelram, Nottm.,

3 H. 3, 183
Fil Hadleia, Nic, 46 H. 3, 230
Fitz Harald, Robert, 5 J., 137^

„ Wm., id.

Fitz Helte, Walter, c. H. 2, 277
Fitz Henry, fil Henry Beighton,

21 E. 3, 480
Fitz Henry, Joha., sister of

Sewell, 2 J., 151
Fitz Henry, N icolas, brother of

Wm., of Walesby, 313
Fitz Henry, le, 37 H. 3, 221

Juetta, his widow, id.
Fitz Henry, Richard, 8. H. 3,

190
Fite Henry, Robert, 33 H. 3,

217
Fitz Henry, Sewell, (10 R.,

I45> 147; (3 J.) 280; (6 J.)

163; (6 J.) 184; (c. R.)339,

279 ; (27 H. III.) 404
And Isabell, 10 R., 127
Fitz Henry, Wm., 28 H. 2,

128 Wj, (of Walesby) 313

Fite Henry, Thomas (21 H.
III.) 420; Chelmardon (10

H VI.) 499
Fitz Herbert, Anthony, 6 H.

6,492

Fite Herbert, Hy. fil. Wm.,

(25 E. I.) 254; (13 H. IV.)

484
Joha., wo. of John, 10 H.

6, 510
Fite Herbert, Jo. (1175) 306;

(23 H. II.) 122; (7 J.) i6»;

(c. J.) 290 J (10 H. VI.) 510
Fite Herbert, Nich., 10 H. 6,

510
Fitz Herbert, Ralf" (sheriff) 50

H. 3, 233
Henry, his son
Rich (c. H. II.) 290; (3

H. III.) 185
Fitz Herbert, Regin, 11 J., 175
„ Thom. (41 H.

III.) 226; (12 E. I.) 245
Nic, his son
Fitz Herbert, Wm. (Certif.)

306-391; (29 H. II.) 139;

(6 J.) 302; (16 H. III.) 203-

289; (1126) 290
Fitz Herbert, Wm., Cestrefeld,

(5 H. III.) 188; Lund. (27

H. III.) 432-445; (6H. VI.)

493
Fitz Hervey, Julia, 2 J., 151

Fil Heward, Rich., 4 J., 154

Fite Hodiema, Waller, 16 H. 3,

203

Fitz Hubert, Alexr., 14 H. 3,

355
Fitz Hubert, Hugo (2 J.) 148J

Henry Lord (6 H. VI.) 486
Fitz Hubert, Mary, widow of

Jo., 53 H. 3, 235
Fite Hubert, Ralf, 25, 33, 51,

55, 68, 88
Fitz Hubert, Wm., 391 ; (5 J.)

160 ; (6 J.) 166 ; (9 H. IH.)

193
Fitz Hugh, Family of Ravens-
worth, 336
Fitz Hugh, Croxall, 35 H. 3,

219
Fitz Hugh, Adam le Comfier,

18 E. I, 250
Fitz Hugh, Eustace, 12 J., 177
Galfry, 10 H. 6, 498
Gilbert, 37 H. 3, 221
Agnes, his wife, id^
Fitz Hugh, Henry Lord, 6 H.

6, 486
Fitz Hugh, Hugo, 13 H. 3, 196
„ John, South Lenton,

4 E. I, 239
Fitz Hugh, Juliana, wo. of
Thos. (31 II. in.) 215 ; (34
H. III.) 217

S32

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Fits Hugh, Marie, wo., Robt
(22 H. III.) 208; (II K II.)
467
Fitz Hugh, Marine ux. Robt.
(3H. III.) 183; (14 H. III.)
199
Fit! Hugh, Nic, 12 J., 176

„ Rnn., North Leir-

ton, 10 E. I, 243
Fitz Hugh, Ralf (22 H. II.)

119 ; (40 H. III.) 225
Fil Hugh. Ralf. 48 H. 3, 232

Sarra, his wife
Fitz Hugh, Rich., Pentrix, 5
H. 3, 187

Ralf, his son, id,
Fitz Hugh, Robert, (2 H. II.)
loi, 107; (14 J.) 179; (23
H. III.) 209; (21 E. I.) 481
FiU Hugh, Walter, 2 J., 148
„ Wm. (Certif.) 315

„ Wm. fil Robt., Cla-

worth, 23 H. 3, 121
Fitz Hugh, Wm. fil Robt., 6

R. I, 136
Fitz Hugh, Wm. (12 H. II.)
108; (I J.) 101 ; (10 H. III.)
194; (34 H. III.) 218; of
Bolsover (21 E. III.) 479
Fil Ingelram, Ralf, 325, 87 ;
(31H, I.)97; (2H. II.)ioo,
103 bis^ 104 bis, 105 bist 106
ter,
Fil Ingelram, Rich. (9 J.) 173 ;

(13 R. III.) 197
Fitz Isaac, Aaron, 34 H. 2, 135
„ Wm., 43 H. 3, 226
Alice,' his wife
Fitz, Isabella Regl, 6 E. 2,

468
Fil Isolde, Wm., 39 H. 3, 223
Fitz Ivan, Hugh, 17 H. 3, 204
Fil Ivo, Walter, 7 J., 169
Fitz Jacob, Thos., Normanton,

21 E. I, 481
Fitz John, Adam, 17 H. 3, 2Ck4
Alan, H. 2, 290
Brian, 44 H. 3, 229
Eustace (1157) 300
John, Stapelford, 2i

H. 3, 415
Fitz John, Nich, Heanor, 27 H.

3,441
Fitz John, Odiema, ux. Stephen,

16 H. 3, 203
Fitz John, Odo (Certif.) 293
„ Rich (27 H. III.)
427; (34 H. III.) 218
Fitz John, Robert, 11 E. 2, 452
,, Simon, 16 H. 3, 203
,, Stephen, 10 H. 3, 195
,, Walter, Colingham,
14 H. 3, 199
Fitz John, Wm. (12 J.) 177;
(34 H. III.) 217

f f

Fil Jordan, AJice, ii J., 175
Gilb., 8 J., 171
Matildc, 9 J., 173
„ Michael, 28 H. 2,

128
Fitz Laurence, Wm., 13 H. 3,

196

Fil Leofwin, Hugo, 27 H. 3,

212
Fil Leofwin, Legardis, wo. of

Ralf, 18 H. 2, 114
Fil Leofwin, Wm., 10 H. 3, 195
Fitz Levine, Rich., 15 H. 2, 11 1
Fil Levenod, Wm., 4 J., 154
Fil Lyolf, Ad., 32 H. 3, 216
Fitz Liolf, Wm., 9 H. 3, 193
Fitz Lionis, Roger, 14 H. 3, 201
Fil Lumeni, Wm., 2 J., 148
Fil Malger, Adam, 12 J., 176
„ Robt., 4 J., 154

„ Wm., 4 J., 154

Fil Margaret, Galf, 1 1 E. 2, 452
Fil Marie, Gilbert, Salle, 31 H.

3. 215
Fil Marie, Wm., 12 J., 177

Fil Mathew, Roger, 35 H. 3,

220

Fitz Matilde, Elias, 2 J., 148

Hy., 10 H. 3, 195

Mathew, 2 J., 148

„ Roger, 32 H. 3,

216

Fitz Matilde, Rich, 2 J., 148

Fil MauDsel, Ralf, 44 H. 3, 230

Fitz Marine, Walden, 34 H. 2,

135
Fil Milo, Manassah (a Jew) 14

H. 3, 201

Fitz MoUe, Walter (4 J.) 154 ;

(17 H. in.) 204

Fil Mul, Wm., Nortwell, 18 E.

I, 250

Fil Nicolas, Hugo, 39 H. 3, 224

^ „ John (5 H. in.)

^87; (13 H. III.) 196

Fiiz Nicolas, Peter (26 H. II.)

125; (II E. n.)4S3

Fitz Nicolas, Ralf (8 H. III.)

191; (10 H. in.) 195; (13

H. in.) 196-7; (14 H. in.)

200-I ; (15 H. III.) 202 ; (16

H. in.) 203; (18 H. in.)

205 ; (21 H. III.) 413-8-9-2 1 ;

(24H. in.) 210 ^w; (27 H.

in.) 432-45; (Thurnton) 445;

(29. H. in.) 213; (34 H.

in.) 216 bis\ (36 H. in.)

220; (46 H. III.) 231
Fitz Nicolas, Ralf (sheriff) (2 H.

in.) 394; (9 H. in.) 193-4

Fitz Nicolas, Ralf, 46 H. 3, 231

Matilde, his wife
Fitz Nicolas, Robert, of Tuxford,
316

Matilde, his wife, id.

Fitz Nicolas, Robert fil Robert,

id,
Fitz Nicolas, Uctred, I2 H. 3,

«97
Fiu Nieuton, Godwin, 18 H.

2, 115
Fiu Nigel, Hugo, of Sandiacre

(27 H in.) 427 ; (34 H. in.)

218
Fitz Nigel, Oliver (9 J.) 173 ;

(3 H. in.) 386
Fiu Nigel, Rich., Wynfield, 32

E. I, 261
Fitz Nigel, Robt. fil WiUiam,

H. 2, 281
Fitz Nigel, William (Certif.)

281 ; (34 H. n.) 135 ; (a

Judge) 458
Fil Norman, Jo. (31 H. III.)

215; (26 E. I.) 254
Fitz Odo, Wm., 11 E. 2, 452
Fitz Oliver, Nigel, 3 H. 3, 184
John (5 H. in.)
. 187; (13H. in.) 197
Fil Orence, Walter, 12 J., 177
Fitz Orm, Roger, 9 H. 3, 193
„ Peter (21 H. IIL)

416 ; of Stanton (21 H. IIL)

423; (27 H. in.) 447
Fitz Pagan, Nicholas, 23 H. 2,

123
Fitz Pagan, Robt. (3 J.) 153;

(5 J.) 160
Fitz Pagan, Wm. fil Wm. (34
H. n.) 135; (38 H. in.)
221
Fitz Pellc, Bate, 7 E. i, 241
Fil Peter, G., 3 H. 3, 184

Galf (6 J.) 180, 136
Peter, 35 H. 3, 219
Ralf, Hokesworth, 27
H. 3, 441
Fil Peter, Thos., 36 H. 3, 220
„ William, Sandiacre, 27

H. 3. 427
Fitz Philip, Rich., 313

„ Robt., 22 H. 2, 120

„ Simon, 14 H. 2,

"o, 334

Fil Ragmerus, Walter ( 1 1 12) 326

Fitz Ralf, Adam (6 J.) 162 ; (10

H. in.) 195
Fitz Ralf, Roger, his brotlsr, id,
„ Amelia, 350
„ Edeline, 346, 350
„ Emma, wo. of Thos.,
12 E. I, 244
Fitz Ralf, Galf, 2 J., 148

4, Henry (4 H. IIL)
186; (5H. in.) 187
Fitz Ralf, Hugo, 13 H. 3, 196

Agnes, ux. , id,
Fitz Ralf, Hugh (sheriff) (22 H.
in.) 208; Gresley (13 H. III.)
198 ; Welley (24 H. IIL) 210

M

If

f>

INDEX OF PERSONS.

533

9Si 97,

FITZ RALF, HUBERT,
BARONY OF, i6, 173, 338,

448, 345-^50; (" H. II.)
107; (14 H. II.) 109; (17
H. II.) 113 ^w; (23 H. II.)
123; (33 H. II.) 134; (2 J.)

149; (3 J.) 154; (5 J.) 160;

(6 J.) 164 ^s; (7 J.) 170;

(8 J.) 172; (12 J.) 177; (13
. J.) 178; (14 J.) 402; (16 T.)

182; (3H. III.) 184; (5 H.

III.) 188; (8H. III.) 190.2;

(22 H. III.) 460
Fite Ralf, Hugo, 348, 358, 392 ;

(2H. III.) 394; {13 H. III.)

196-8; Agnes (16 H. III.)

203; (20 H. III.) 207; (21

H. III.) 416-8-20.3; (22 H.

3) 208; (24 H. III.) 210; (25

H. III.) 210; (26 H. III.) 212

dis, ; (27 H. III.) 427.41-2-6;

(34 H. III.) 218; (46 H. III.)

231 ; (7 E. I.) 241, 337
FiU Ralf, Julian, 346

„ Osbert, 6 T., 162
„ Odo, 31 H. I,

98, 346-8, 350
Fil Ralf, Peter, 7 J., 169
Fitz Rad, Rad, (5 J.) l6l ; (38

H. III.) 222
Fitz Ranulf, Robert (Certif.)

353; (c. H. II.) 100, 104-6,

dts; (n H. II.) 107; ofSut.

ton, 316 ; Adeline, his wife,

ui. ; Normanton (28 H. II.)

128; (Certif.) 291 ; of Aldwol.

deston, 347 ; Alboldeston, 355 ;

109 dis; (16 H. II.) 112 dis ;

(17 H. II.) 113 dis.; (20 H.

II.) 116 h's; (22 H. II.) 120;

{23 H. II.) 121,289; (30 H.

III.) 215
Fitz Ralf, Roger (22 H. II.)

120; (31 H. II.) 132; (32 H.

n.)i33; (33 H. II.) 134; (II

E. II.) 453-4
Fitz Ralf, 1 hos. (37 H. II.) 221 ;

(6R. I.) 295; (3 H. III.) 185;

Red ware (33 E. I.) 261 ; John,

his brother, id.
Fitz Ralf, sister of Wm., ux

Serlo de Grendon, c. H. 2,

308
Fitz Half, Wm. (c. H. 11.) 314 ;

(12 H. II.) 108, 109; (14 H.

II.) no, 112 bis ; (18 H. II.)

114; of Alwoldeston, 347;

Hibaldeston, 385 ; (2^ H.

II.) 120; (23H.II.)i2fc-3.

4; (6R. I.) 136; (4H.TII.)

186; (27 H. III.) 221

Fitz Ralf, Wm. (sheriff) 18 H.

2, "3-4,347-350
Fitz Ralf, Wm., Dapifer, 39 H.

2, 130

f}

»f

»,

Fil Reginald, Hy., 35 H. 3, 221

Hugh, 5 H. 3, 187

Osbert,^5j., 157

„ Robt., S9 H. 2,

129

Fil Reginald, Walkelin, Faume,

14 H. 3, 201
Fitz Reginald, Walter, 6 J., 161
Fitz Rein, Wm., 18 H. 2, 113,

114
FiU Reinfred, Gilbert (1198)

389; (14 J.) 403
Fitz Reinfred, Roger, 31 H. 2,

131
Fitz Remigius, Hugh, 391

Ralf, 391

Fitz Reni, Wm., 12 H. 2, 108

Fitz Rein, Wm., 18 H. 2, 113- 14

Fitz Reingod, Eda, 21 H. 3,

413
Fil Rich, El, Bekmgham, 43 H.

3. »27
Fil Rich, Hy. (10 H. III.) 194;

(13 H. III.) 196

Fitz Richard, Hugo (Certif.) 308

„ John, c. H. 6, 491

Fitz Rich, Juetta, widow of

Simon, 10 R., 145

Fil Rich, Nigel, 44 H. 3, 229

Ralf, 10 R. I., 145

Reg., 4 H. 3, 186

Rich. (1 182) 453; (12

H. III.) 196

Fil Rich, Robt. (4 H. II.) 122 ;

(10 R. I.) 145; (3 J.) 153;

(5 J.) 158; (7 J.) 169; (4H.

III.) 187; (16 H. III.) 203;

Normanton, 308
Fitz Rich, Roger, (il E. II.)

453 ; (21 H. III.) 421
Fitz Rich, Simon, 349 ; (5 H.

II.) 104; (21 H. II.) 117;

(22 H. II.) 120; (23 H. II.)

121 ; (27 H. II.) 127 ; (29 lA

II.) 129 ^

Fitz Rich, Tom (5 J.) 160; (6

J. 166; (12 J.) I77*w; (16

H. III.) 203
Fitz Rich, Walter (14 H. III.)

199; (48 H. II.) 233
Fitz Rich, Wm. (33 H. II.) 134 ;

(8 J.) 171; (12 J.) 177; (13
J.) 178; Aston (10 H. VI.)
508
Fitz Rich, Wm. (le clerk) 53 H.

3,235
Fil Rich, Wm. (Catun) 46 H. 3,

230

Fil Robert, Ad., 6 J., 166

I Galf, 13 H. 3, 197

Gilbert, 53 H. 3, 235

Helewise,. widow of

Wm., II J., 175

Fitz Robert, Henry (1$ H. II.)

Ill ; (32 H. IL) 132

it
ft

»

Fitz Robert, Hugo (24 H. IL)
123; (6 J.) 165; (14 J.) 399;
(2 H. III.) 393 h's ; (4 H.
II L) 187

Fitz Robert, John, 4 J., 154

Ralf(4j.)i567(i3

J.) 178; (7H. m.)i89
Fitz Robert, Ralf, of Sibtoft, 8

H. 3, 191
Fitz Robert, Ralf fil Wm., 22

H. 2, 121
Fitz Robert, Reginald de Lamil.

ley, 38 H. 3, 222
Fitz Robert, Richard (29 H. II. )

129; (35H. IL) 136; (7 J.)

168; (8 J.) 171; (43 H. III.)

227
Fitz Robert, Robert (6 J.) 164 ;

(10 H. IIL) 195; (II E. IL)

452 ; Bekingbam (43 H. III.)

227
Fitz Robert, Roger, 4 E. i, 238
Robert and Hugh, his bro-
thers
Fitz Rol^rt, Simon, Alice,

widow of, ui,
Fitz Robert, Stephen, 16 H. 3,

203
FiU Robert, Walter, Eleanor,

widow of, 38 H. 3, 222
Fitz Robert, Wallanus, 29 H. 2,

129
FiU Robert, Warin (22 H. IL)

118; (23 H. IL) 121
Fitz Robert, Wm., 348 ; (18 H.

IL) 113; (28 H. IL) 128;

(1198)388; (8 R. L) 371-91 ;

(3j.)i52-3;(5j.)i6o;(6J.)

1646
Fitz Rc^er, Alice, wo. of Robt.,

35 H. 3, 219
Fitz Roger, Galfy (Certif.) 316
Fil Roger, Hugh (c. H. II.) 316 ;

(3 H. IIL) 184 ; (4 H. IIL)

316
FiU Roger, Ingram (Clic) 9

E. I, 242
Fil Roger, Nic, 46 H. 3, 231
Fitz Roger, Norman, i J., 146
„ Peter, 350

, . Ranulf ( Maresia) 2 1

H. 3. 419. 422
FiU Roger, Robert (31 H. IL)

131; (4 J.) 151; (5 J-) 159;

(6 J.) 162; (13 J.) 178
Fil Roger, Roger (14 J.) 180;

(6 H. IIL) 188
Fil Roger, Thomas, Eyton (30

E. L 469; (20 E. IIL) 474
Fil Roger, Wm. (22 H. II.)

122; (2 J.) 149; (13 H. IIL)

197 ; (27 H. IIL) 442
FiU Roy, Edward, 38 H. 3,

221-3
Fil Saieve (Azor fil) 69

534

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Fitz Sarra, Ralf, ii E. 2, 454
FiU Serlo, Robt., 7 Jm I7I

Wm. (48 H. III.)

262 ; Lenton (19 £. I.) 251
Fitz Seward, Hugh, 14 H. 3,

201
Fitz Sewi, Godwin, 32 H. 2,

Fitz Sewcll, Hy., 7 J., 280
Fitz Simon, German, 316

„ Ralf (23 H. II.)

328; (9 R. I.) 329, 348
Fitz Simon, Simon (20 H. II.)

116; Middleton (27 H. III.)

448; (21 £. III.) 481
Fitz Simon, Thomas, 2 J., 148

„ Wm., 48 H. 3, 232
Fite Snelling, Hugh, 34 H. 2,

135
Fitz Sparri, Wm., 34 H. 2, 135

Fitz Stephen, Eustace, 20 H. 2,

116

Fitz Stephen, Jacob, 35 H. 2,

136
Fitz Stephen, Ralf Camera, 14

H. 2, no
Filz Stephen, Ralf, 347-50-3-4-

89; (2 H. II.) 102; (II H.

II.) 107; (16 H. II.) 112;

(23 H. II.) 121 ; (28 H. II.)

178 ; (32 H. II.) 132 ; (I J.)

147; (3 JO 153; (6 J.) 162
Fitz Steohen, Roger, 3 H. 3,

184
Fitz Stephen, Thos., 9 E. i,

243
Fil Swan, Peter, 39 H. 3, 223

Amice, his wife

Fitz Swan, Rich, 9 H. 3, 193

Fil Swan, Stephen, 8 J., 172

Fil Theobald, Ran, 13 J., 179

Fil Theobald, Theobald, Nottm.,

3 J., 153
FilToke, Galf, 8 J., 171

FiU Thoke, John, 3 H. 3, 185

Fil Thorkeyn, Robt., 50 H. 3,

234
Fitz Thos, Anketel, Ratclive,

27 H. 3, 427

Fitz Thos, Hy. le Clerk (Hop-
ton) 13 £. I, 246

Fitz Thos, Robert (Certif.) 314

Fil Thomas, Sarra, wo. Walt.,
40 H. 3, 224

Fitz Thurkill, Regl., 15 H. 2,
III

Fil Toll, Robert, 31 H. I, 99
,, Peter, 2 H. 2, loi

Fitz Tore, Reginald, 35 H. 2,

136
FilTurg, Robt., 8 J., 171
Fitz Turold, Nic, 26 H. 2, 125
Fitz Uctred, Wm., 21 H. 2, 117
Fil Ulfketel, Willm., 16 H. 3,

203

Fitz Ulkil, Nigel, 12 H. 3, 197
Fil Ulric, Rich, 38 H. 3, 222
Fitz Vcke, Gerard, 35 H. 2,

136
Fil Vinet, Wm., ii J., 175
Fil Walkelin, of Derby, c. H. 2,

292
Goda, his wife, id,
Fil Walkelin, Alina, wo. of

Wm., 16 J., 181
Fil Walkelin, Alina, wo. of

Robt., 4 H. 3, 186; H.,

brother of Robert, c. H. 2, 289
Fitz Walkelin, Rich, 8 J., 171
„ Robt. (Certif.)

286 ; (D.) id, ; c. H. 2, 289
Robert, his son, id, and 287
Fil Walkelin, Robt., 8 J., 171
,, Walkelin, brother

of Henry, 13 J., 178
Fitz Walkelin, Wm. (Certif.)

291 ; (25 H. II.) 124; (26

H. II.) 125, 386-9, 391 ; (32

H. II.) 132; (9 R.) 373;

(2 J.) 148-9 ; (4 J.> 156 ;

(5 J.) 160; (8 J.) 172; (9 J.)

173; of Dufton (7 J.) 170;

(18 H. III.) 205; (12 J.) 176
Fitz Walkelin, Wm., Tickill,

(4 J.) 155 ; (2 H. III.) 409
Fitz Wale, Wm., 31 H. 2, 131
Fitz Walter, Albreda, 34 H. 2,

135
Fitz Walter, Bamab. (Hertwell)

7 J., 169
Fil Walter, John (14 J.) 179;

(5 H. III.) 188
Fitz Walter, John, 25 E. I, 254,

and Margaret ,,

Fitz Walter, Jordan, Snotington,

4 H. 3, 187
Fitz Walter, Nicol, 34 H. 2,

Rite Walter, Richard (38 H. II.)
T36; (28 H. III.) 213 bis;

Jordan, bail of, id.
Fitz Walter, Robert j(iS H. II.)

Ill ; (22 H. II.) 120 bis \ (28

H. II.) 129
Fitz Walter, Roger (23 H. II.)

121 ; merchant (2 J.) 148
Fitz Walter, Ralf, 2 J., 148

,, Thomas, 11 E. 2,

452
Fitz Walter, Wm., Nottingham
(14 H. III.) 201; (II E. II.)

452

Fitz Warin, Galf, 309

„ Nich, 48 H. 3, 233

„ Wm., 44 H. 3, 229

Fitz William, Adam and Isabella,

"J.. I7S
Fitz William, Alan, 392

„ Amicia, wo. of

John, 40 H. 3, 124

Fitz William, Augustine, Not-
tingham, 12 H. 3, 197

Fitz William, Elias, Upton, 10
E. I, 243

Fitz William, Galf, 36 H. 3, 220
„ Herbert, Wod-

burgh, 17 E. I, 249

Fitz William, Hugh (3 H. III.)
184 ; Huccenal (21 H. III.)

413

Fitz William, Ingelram, 12 J.,

176
Fitz William, Tocelin, 392

„ John, BreydistoD,

20 E. 3, 475
FiU William, Martin, 12 H. 3,

197
Cecil, his wife, 12 H. 3, 197
Fitz William, Mathew, 2 J., 151

(qy. de Hathersage)
Fitz William, Peter (30 J.) 152;

(6 J.) 162
Fitz William, PhUip, 37 H. 3,

221
Fitz William, Ralf (Certif. ) 308

His nephew (2 J.) 148
Fitz William, ReginaJd, 12 J.,

177
Fitz William, Rich. (2 J.) 149 ;

Berton (21 H. III.) 421

Fitz William, Robert, 25, 63;

(8 R. I.) 371,391; (13 J.)
178; (16 J.) 181; (13 H. III.)
19^*9 ; (14 H. III.) 200 ; (16
H. III.) 202 ; (21 H. III.)
418; (43 H. III.) 228; (44
H. III.) 230; (II E. II.) 453

Fitz William, Robert, heirs of,
38 H. 3, 222

Fitz William, Robert, Stafford,
14 E. I, 246

Fitz William, Roger (23 H. II.)
121 ; (26 H. II.) 136; (31
H. II.) 131; (6 J.) 162

Fitz William, Thos. (21 H. III.)
418-21 ; Hareworth (27 H.
III.) 436; Rempston, 437-8 ;
(35 H. III.) 217 ; Bradiston
(27 H. III.) 440; (II E. II.)
453 ; (21 E. III.) 481

Fitz William, Walter (8 J.) 171 ;
West Draiton (14 E. I.) 246

Fitz William Linton, 10

E. I, 243
Robt., his son

Fitz William, Wm. (1198) 389,
391 ; (8 J.) 172 ; Wareberc
(2 H. III.) 409 ; Eton (30 E.
I.)%69

Fitz Wirtmcra, Robt., 25 H. 2,
124

Fil Wiscard, Wiscard, 32 H. 3,
216

Fitz Wulfari, Wm., 35 H. 2,

135

INDEX OF PERSONS.

535

>}

»

if
11

Fil Wulfine, Hy. fil, 34 H. 2,

Fil Wulmar, Wm., 12 H. 2, io8
Fil Wulfric, Wulf, 318
Gilbert, u/,
Godwin, id.
Ulf, id,

Wm. (qy. Hather-
sage) id.
Fil Wulfric, Mathw. fil Wm.,

318 ; 22 H. 2, 120
Fil Xpian, Pauline, 25 H. 2, 124
Flaburc, Nigel, 22 H..2, iio
Flaxman, Wm., 13 H. 4, 484
FLANDERS, EARL OF (i

H. IL) 99, 100, 102, 136
Flanders, Faipon, 20 H. 2, 116
German, 20 H. 2, 116

Jom9 J., 173
Rich. (12 J.) 176; (3
H. in.) 184
Flande.s, Roger, 22 H. 2, 119
Fleming, Adam (28 E. I.) 257 ;

(II £. IL) 454
Fleming, Galf, 28 E. I, 257
„ Henry, 46 H. 3, 231
„ Toceus (D.) 314; 94
(31 H. I.)
Richard, his son, id.
Fleming, John (24 E. I.) 253;
(II E. II.) 453.4
Matilde, his wife, 454
Fleming, Rich., 6 J., 163

„ Rich, fil Kobt. (27 E.
I.) 255; (II E. II.) 453
Fled burg, Parson of, 11 £.2,

452
Flintham, Dna de, 2 H. 3, 409
„ John fil John, 46 11.
3,231
Flintham, Rich., 11 E. 2, 452
„ Wm., 1 1 E. 2, 454
Flinthorpe, Gilbt. fil Robt., 18

E. I, 250
Flinthorpe, Gilbt., 32 £. I, 261
Foliot, Rich., 19 B. 1, 251
„ Wm., Stoke, 21 H. 3, 186
„ Jordan, 12 H. 3, 197
Foljambe', Edward, 6 H. 6, ^90
„ Tohn, 28 E. I, 258
„ Martin, 10 H. 6, 501
„ Nich, Boilston, 1 1 E.

2,454
Foljambe, Roger, of Elton, 10

H. 6, 501
Foljambe, Tom (9 J.) 173; (11

J.) 175; (12 J.) 177; (15 J.)

180; (25 n. in.) 210; (43
H. in.) 227; (44 H. in.)

229; (loE. L) 243; (II E.
I.) 244 dis ; (13 E. I.) 246 ;
(14 E. L) 247; (17 E. I.)
249; (28 E. L) 257-8; (13
H. IV.) 484; (10 H. VL)

496-9, 500-3

I,

II

Foljambe, Thos., Bailiff of High

Peak, 25 E. i, 254
Foljambe, Thomas fil Jo., 356
Foljambe, Thos. fil Thos., 24 £.

h 253
Foljambe, Thos. fil Thorn, 19 E.

I, 251 and
Alice „

Foljambe, Wm. (18 H. IL) 114 ;

(20 E. I.) 254 ; of Gretton

(33 E. L) 356
Folefaunt, Wm., 7 E. i, 241
Folville, Rc^er, 21 E. 3, 480
„ Wm. (14 J.) 396; (I

E. I.) 238
Fontibus, Eudo, 20 H. 2, 116
„ Roger (Carlton) 6 R.

I, 136
Fonte, Simon, 34 H. 2, 135
Fontaine, Robt., 4 E. I, 239
Fontem, Hy. ad, 12 £.

244
Ford, Odinel, 306
Forester, Adam, Tounted,

E. 2, 453
Forester, Hy., 20 H. 2, 116
„ Hugo, 392 (5 J.) 160;

(6 J.) 166; (II J.) 175
Forester, John le, 9 E. I, 243
„ John, 41 H. 3, 226
„ Stephen, 41 H. 3, 226
Forneys, Wm., 21 H. 3, 413
Forth, Clement, 28 E. I, 258

„ Nic. de la (28 E. L)

258; (20 E. in.) 477
Forth, Ralf, 21 E. 3, 480
Fosser, Rich., 38 H. 3, 221
Fosour, Rich., 39 H. 3, 223
Fouler, Simon, 6 E. 2, 468
FouD, Hy. le, 43 H. 3, 227

„ John (26 H. in.) 125;

(35 H. in.) 219; (19E. L)

251
Foun, Oliver (22 H. IIL) 208;

(43H. IIL)226; (44H. in.)

229 ; (12 E. I.) 245
Foun, Oliver fil Oliver, 35 H.

3, 220
Foun, Walter, 1 1 E. 2, 455

„ Wm., II E. 2,453
Fox, Rich., Taunesley, 11 E. 2,

453
Foxlow, Reg., 35 H. 3, 219

Framley, Matilde, 44 H. 3, 230

FRANCIS, FRANCEIS,

FRANCO

Francis, Arnulf, 29 H. 2, 129

Galf, Osmundeston, 27

»f

E. I, 255
Francis, Gilbert le, 302 ; 4 £.

1,303
Francis, John, Cumberland (c

H. III.) 304 ; (20 E. III.)

486; John, Tikenhall (10 H.

VI.) 5047- 10

Francis; fil Robert (il H.

in.) 304
Francis, Isabella, wo. of Robt.
(20 E. IIL) 486; (10 H. VL)

496, 503-4-6
Francis, Ralf, 13 H. 4, 484
„ Rich. (II J.) 175; (12

L) 177; (20 E. L) 251; (21

E. L) 252; (31 E. L) 259;

of Tibshelf, (21 E. III.) 481
Francis, Robert (ii89)-(ii J.)

304; (40 H, IIL) 225; (13

H. IV.) 484
Francis, Simon, heirs of, 6 U.

6,486
Francis, Wm. (17 H. IL) 113;

(24 H. III.) 210
Francis, Wm., Archelastre, 22

H. 3, 208
Francis, Wm., Tibshelf, 32 E. i,

261
Frarin, John, 14 J., 180
Eraser, Ralf, 2 H. 3, 408
Freeman, Galf, 27 H. 3, 438

Rich. (27 H. IIL)

4295 (34 H. IIL) 218
Freeman, Robt., 10 H. 6, 506
„ Thos., 10 H. 6, 504
„ Walter (4 E. L) 238 ;

(II E. IL)452
Fremunt, Galf (Certif.) 324, 334,

348, 359
Fremunt, Magr. Wm., 44 H. 3,

230

Fremunt, Wm., brother of Gal-
fry, 5 J- » 335

Frenis, Adam, 9 E. I, 243

Frenia, Ric, Lendal, 53 H. 3,

234
Freeve, Wm., 27 H. 3, 212

Freschville, Anker, 346 ; (46 H.
IIL) 231; (20 E. IIL) 475;
(21 E. IIL) 480

Freschville, John 21 E. 3, 480

Freschville, Hubert, 44 H. 3,
227

Freschville, Rad (13 H. IIL)
198; (14 H. IIL) 200; (16
H. III.) 202; (21 H. IIL)
413-6-8, 421-3 ; (22 H. IIL)
460; (27 H. IIL) 448; (26
H. IIL) 212; (30 H. IIL)
214; (35 H. IIL) 220; (38
H. III.) 222; (41 H. IIL)
226; (43 H. IIL) 228; (44
H. in.) 329; (4E. L)239;
(7E. L)24i; (15E. L)248;
(26E. L)255; (30 E. L)469-
70-5; (33 E. L)263; (4 E.
IL) 464-5; fil Ralf (4 E. IL)
464; (20 E. in.) 474-5; (13
H. IV.) 484

Freville, Drc^e, 329

„ Gilbert (Norfolk) 333

Friend, Robt., 12 H. 2, 108

536

INDEX OF PERSONS.

If

Freskenarde^Thos., 1 1 E. 2, 455

„ Wm., 7 E. I, 241

Froddesham, Wm., 27 E. I, 255
Frog, Archdeacon, 2 H. 2, 1 01
Frychbeck, Robt., 9 £. I, 242
Fulbec,Galf(Certif.) 317
„ J[ohn, 5 E. I, 240
Fulc, Prior of Tutbury, c H. 2,

289
Fulcr, Hy. le, 32 H. 3, 216

„ Wm. le, 32 H. 3, 216
Fulhelm, John, 12 E. 1, 245
Fuller, German, 1 1 E. 2, 453

„ Nic, II E. 2, 453
Furnel, John, 22 H. 3, 460
R., 3 J., 154
Rich.(ii98)389;(i4j.)

296; (2 H. III.) 409; (28 H.

HI.) 213
Furnel, Robt. (18 H. III.) 203;

(21H. IIL)422;(27H. III.)

432
Furnel, Wm. (2 H. III.) 408;

(27 H. III.) 436
Furneus, Ralf (1252) 351

„ Rich, ^90; {26 E. I.)

255; (sheriff) (28-29 £• !•)

257; (30 E. I.) 259
Furneus, Robt. (21 H. III.)

419; ()2 H. III.) 216; of

Beighton, 336
Furneus, Walter, 5 E. I, 240
Furnays, Robt., 27 H. 3, 439
FURNIVAL, LORD, 6 H. 6,

492
Furnival, Bertha, 1 1 E. 2, 452
„ Gerard (c. J.) 296,

390; (2 J.) 148; (4 J.) 156;

(5T.)i6o; (6 J.) 165; (56 H.

HI.) 233

„ Robert, 10 R., 145
„ Thos. (50 H. III.)
353; (10 E. I.) 243; (26 E.

10 255 ; (30 E. I.) 464-72-7

Fusel, Wm., 46 H. 3, 231
Fyndern (see Findem)
Fysche, Rico, 25 E. I, 254

Galdeges, John (Certif.) 317
Galet, Ric, 13 H. 3, 197
Galfry, Canon (31 H. II.) 131 ;

(14 J.) 396
Gaufredus, Abbot of Burton

(1114-50) 287 ; 5 H. 2, 104

Geoffry (Prior of Stoke Curci),

334
Geoffry, Clic, 5 J., 157

„ Lenton, 32 H. 3,

216

Galum, Roger, H. 2, 290

Gaml)yn, Hy., Deneburg, 25 E.

'» *54 „ ^

Gamel, 37, 38, 48, 49, SO ter,,

51

Gamel, of Nottm., 31 H. 2, 131
„ Walter fil, 2 J., 149
„ Walter, 5 J., 157

Gamelesby, Wm. (33 E. I.)
261 ; (II E. II.) 454

Gamelston, Walter (pson.) 46
H. 3, 231

Gamelston, Wm., 43 H. 3, 227

Games, Nic, 11 E. 2, 454

Gamcston^ Johanna,46 H. 3, 231

GANT, Barony, 441

GANT, GILBERT DE, 16,
25, 55, 61, 63 (6 J.) 165, 314,
348; (21 H. III.) 419; (22

H. in.) 459
Gaunt, Hy. le (50 H. III.) 234 ;

(55 H. III.) 237

Eu5tacia, ux. ej.

Walter, 318

Garden, Hy. le, 48 H. 3, 232

„ Hugo fil Thos., 55 H.

3,237
Garden, Thos., 10 H. 6, 501

Garet, Wm., 4 J., 154

Garnet, Roger, 15 H. 2, 11 1

Gatehurd, Thos., 13 E. I, 245

Gatesdene, Jo., 25 H. 3, 210

Gatteford, Bernard de, 12 H. 2,

108
Gatton, Gamel, 2 J., 148

„ John (25 H. in.) 210;

(26 H. m.)2i2
Gauditon, 14 J., 398
Gaugy, Wm., 19 H. 3, 206
Gee, Mr. Alderman, Records

of Chesterfield, 362
Geldsboure, John, 12 E. i, 245
Gell, John (Hopton) 10 H. 6,

510
Geora, Galf (34 H. IL) 135;

(9 J.) 174 ^M.
Gerard, Hugo, 10 H. 6, 500

,, Rol^rt, 10 H. 6, 500
Gerbaud, Ad., 4 E. i, 239

Rich, his brother „
Gerebant, Rico, 12 E. I, 245
Geremund, Ralf (Certif.) 336
Gernebern, 52
Gemet, Benedict, 31 H. 2, 131

„ Wm., 27 H. 3, 434
Gemun, Hy. (5 H. IIL) 188;

(20 £. I.) 251
Gernun, John fil Wm., 20 E. 3,

471
Gernun, Rad (i J.) 146-8 ; (2 J.)

150; (5 J.) 159; (2H. III.)
408; (21 H. IIL) 418; (22
H. IIL) 209; (25 H. III.)
211 ; (26 H. IIL) 211 ; (27
H. IIL) 447
Gernun, Rich, 3 L, 151

„ Wm. (26 H. III.) 211;
(33 H. IIL) 217; (21 E. L)
252; (30 E. L) 470; (4 E,
IL) 464

Gervase, cleric of Clifton, 32

H. 2, 132
Geune, Peter, 30 H. 3, 214
Gevedel, Galf, 392
Geytford, Wm., 22 H. 3, 208
Giene, Elya (40 H. III.) 224 ;

(II £. 11.^ 452
Gifford, Osbert, 34 H. 3, 218

„ Walt., 17 E. I, 249

„ Wm. (Certif.) 310
Gilbert, Magister, 31 H. 2, 131

„ Nich, 10 H. 6, 500

Thos. (28 H. IL) 128 ;

(II E. IL)454
Gilbert (pson.) Flintham, 12 H.

3, 197
Gille, Robert, 48 H. 3, 233

Ginesley, Gilbert, 55 H. 3, 236

Ginkelpeny, Robt., 31 H. 3,

2?5
Gipeswiz, Alexr., 34 H. 2, 134

Giroie Family, 330
Gisors, Peter, 48 H. 3, 232
Gladwin, 66 ; 19 H. 2, 129
,, of Melburn, 15 h* 2,
no
Glamorgan, Robt., 55 H. 3,

237
Glanville, Ran., 21 H. 2, 117

Glapwell, Ralf, 30 E. I, 471-5

„ Rich, 10 H. 6, 498

„ Robt.(32H. IL)I33;

(20^. IIL) 476; (21 E. IIL)

480
Glapwell, Thos., 21 H. 3, 416
„ Wm., 13 H. 3, 349
Glaydon, Adam, 2 H. 3, 410
Gled, Wm., 46 H. 3, 230
Gledson, Rd., 13 H. 4, 484
Glide, Simon (21 H. IIL) 416 ;

Normanton (43 H. IIL) 227
Glossop, Wm., 10 H. 6, 501
GLOUCESTER. RICH FIL,

THE EARL OF, 300
Gluton, Gilbert (sergeanty) (2

H. IIL) 408; (27 H. IIL)

. 430

Gluton, Simon le, 2 J., 148

Gobion, Hugh (Certif.) 310

Goce, Rich, 11 E. 2, 453

GODA, COUNTESS, 34, 69 bis

Godardsvill, Walter, 10 H. 3,

194

Johanna, ux ej, bis.

Isabella, her sister
Godberd, Roger, 2 J., 149
Goded, 32
GODEVA,COUNTESS,69«y,

87
Godeva, 64

Gode, Galf fil, 2 J., 149

Godfrey, 31 H. 2, 131

Godhe, Wm., 12 H. 3, 197

Godinghart, Walter, 12 E. I,

245

Godington, Galf, Tukeford, 12
E. I, 245

Godric, 31 bis, 38, 40 bis, 4i» 44>
47, 50, 62 bis, 63, 64, 65 bis \
(23 H. 11.) 121

God purs, Rich., 10 H. 3, 195

Godwin, 37 bis, 43 bis, 48 bis,
49,50; (21 H. II.) 131 ; the
Priest, 68

Goebold, Robt., 4 H. 2, 104-5

Goisfred, J5, 56

Golafre, Hugo, 334

Golegnin, 49 (see Colegrim)

Goldington, Peter (Certif.) 291 ;
(2H. II.) 100; (13 H. II.)
109; (16H. II.) 112; (33 H.
II.) 134 J (4 J.) 156; (6 J.)
164; (13 J.) 178; (16 J.) 181;
(3 H. III.) 185 ; (8 H. III.)
191; (13 H. III.) 199; (14
H. III.) 200; (16 H. III.)
202 ; (21 H. III.) 420 ; (27
H. III.) 447 ; (30 H. III.)
2145 (1% H. III.) 222; (43
H. III.) 228; (48 H. til.)
233; (7 E. I.) 241; (15 E. I.)

247
Joha., widow of Peter, 39

H. 3, 223
Gombald, Nic, il J., 175
Gornac, Walttr, H. 2, 275
Gorram fam., 100
Gosberchurch, 242
Gosling, Ad. (4 H. III.) 187;

(5 H. III.) 187
Goscelin, Wm., brother of, 2 J.,

148 ^

Goumfrey, Adam fil Adam, 34

£. I, 262
Gousbill, Adam, 30 E. 1, 470-7
Math., I E. I, 238
Matilde, 44 H. 3, 229
Nich., heirs of, 13 H.

4,484
Gousbill, Rad(K. II.) 289; (5

J.) 161; (7 J.) 170; (3 H.

III.) I84;'(I3E. I.) 246

Walter, his son (3 H. III.)

184; (21 H. III.) 420

Gousbill, Robert, 16 E. i, 249

Rich., 10 H. 6, 496

llios. (21 E. III.) 479;

(6H. VI.) 492

Goushill, Walter (sheriff) 25;

(21 H. III.) 415; (27 H.

III.) 439 ; (10 E. I.) 243 ;

(13 E. I.) 246 ; (23 and 25 E.

I.) 252; (27 E. I.) 255; (30

E. I.) 470; (33 E. I.) 261

Gousbill, Wm., 35 H. 3, 220

Gozelin, 35

Grace, Robt., 12 E. 1, 245

Graham, Hy., 48 H. 3, 232

„ Wm., Lincolns. (28 E.

I.) 257; (II E. 11.) 454

38

ft

f »

If

f»

)•

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Grandi$on, Odo, 28 E. i , 258
Granfold, Hugh, 4 J., 154
Grant, John le, 9 H. 3, 193

„ John, 32 E. I, 261

,, John, Hokes worth, 19 E.

I, 251
Grant, Peytevin, Line, 14 H.

3,201
Grant, Wm., 35 H. 3, 210
Grantham, John, Bailiff, Notts.

(27 E. I.) 235; (30 E. I.) 259
Granton, Roger, H. 2, 277
Grasso, Rich., 20 H. 2, 116
Grau, Walter, 28 E. I, 257
Grava, Gilb., 4 H. 3, 187
Grave, Adam fil Wm., 14 H. 3,

201
Grave, Henry, id.

„ Walter, ii E. 2, 454

,, Robt. fil Rich., 16 H. 3,

203
Gravel, Robt., 25 H. 3, 210 •

Matilde, his wife, id.
Gravener, Robt., 6 H. 6, 493
Gredlee, Herbert (21 E. I.) 252 ;

(II E. II.) 452 (5ee Gridling)
Gregory, Robt., 10 H. 6, 500
Grun, Margt., wo. of Raif, 34

H. 3, 218
Greencertel, Robt., 13 H. 3, 196
Greneley, Matilde, wo. of Simon,

44 H. 3, 229
Grenelegh, Thos., 27 H. 3, 443
Gjreenhill, Simon, 20 E. 3, 474

bis
Greenhow fam., 95
Grcenstead, Rich., H. 2, 277
GreenKtreet, Mr. (Lincolnshire

Roll) 323
Green way, Hugo, 10 H. 6, 500
Grendon, Andrew, 16 E. I, 248
„ Henry, R. I, 308
„ Hu^o fil Ralf, E. I,

308
Grendon, John, R. i, 308

„ Jord., 44 H. 3, 229,

230
Grendon, Rad (35 H. III.) 220 ;

(39 H. III.) 223
Grendon, Robt., c R. I, 308
,, Roger (Certif.) 308
„ Serlo (24 H. II.) 308,

12Z bis., 1245
Grendon, Thomas, c H. 6, 308
„ Wm. (I R, I.) 129,

308; (2 J.) 148; (27H. II.)

■459^ (41 H. in.) 226; (I

E. I.) 238
Grendon, Wm. (T. de N.) 308
,, Wm. fil Andrew, 44

H. 3. 230
Grcnelega, Wm., 29 H. 2, 129
Grentmesnel, Hugh, c W. i,

296 ; (1102) 322

Rohaise fil Hugh, 331

»*

)»

537

Gresley fam., 282

Agnes fil Ralf, 248
Galf, Kl. (22 H. in.)

209, 462 ; (30 E. I.) 470 ;

(4E. L)*239; (34 E. L)262,

288
Gresley, Henry, 23 H. 2, 122;

(1178)288
Gresley, Hugo fil Ralf, 335 ;

(14 H. in.) 200 ; (16 H. III.)

202; (30 H. in.) 214; (43

(H. III.) 228; (7 E. L) 241;

(15 E. I.) 247
Gresley, Hugo (13 H. III.) 198 ;

(15 H. in.) 201; (44 H. III.)

229
Gresley, John (20 E. IIL) 288,

488 ; fil Galfry (20 E. III.)

470-6; (6H. VI.) 488
Gresley, Isabella, Ralph, 16 J.,

180 ; Agnes, sister of, id.
Gresley, Mathw., 53 H. 3, 235
Rad (3 J.) 153 ; (4 J.)

«55-6; (5 J') 159; (6 J.) 164;

(9 J.) 173; (12 J.) 176; (13

J.) 178; (14 J.) 179; (16 J.)

i8o-i ; (8 H. in.) 191; (10

H. in.) 195; (13 H. in.)

196 bis; (38 H. III.) 222;

(30 E. I.) 472
Gresley, Ralf, and Isabelle, his

wife, 4 H. 3, 186
Gresley, Reginald, c H. 2, 288
„ Robert (1178) 288; (23

H. n.) 122; (1198) 389; (6

J.) 165
Gresley, Thomas (chev.) (13

H. IV.) 484; (6 IL VL)

488-92; (10 H. VL) 504
Gresley, Wm. de, 31 H. i, 95-7
„ Wm. (T. de N.) 288 •

(2 H. IIL) 409; (27 H, IIL)

445
Gretton = Graitan

Grattan, Jo. (32 H. IIL) 216;

(32 E. L) 261; (II E. IL)

453
Grattan, Rad, 35 H. 3, 219

Matilde, his wife

Grattan, Rich fil Rich, 55 H. 3,

236

Gratian, Simon fil Gervase, 53

H. 3. 235
Grattan, Titomas, 3^6

„ Wm., 29 K. I, 258-

,, Greville J., 10 H. 6,

499
Grey, Emma, 10 H. 6, 505

„ Emlyn, 13 H 4, 484

Grai, Hy. (7 J.) 170; (13 J.)

178
Grey, Isolde (7 IL IIL) 189;
(8 H. IIL) 192; (21 H.
III.) 417-24; (27 H. IIL)
434.46

538

Grey, Ily. (l J.) 146; (4 J.)

156; (5 J-) »59; (6 J.) 164;
(16 J.) 181 2; (2 H. III.)
407; (3 H. III.) 185 dis,;
(of Thorington) 247 ; (16 H.
III.) 202 ; (21 II. III.) 414 ;
(22 H. III.) 459-61 ; (30
H. III.) 214; (38 H. III.)
222; (43 H. III.) 228; (30 E.
I.) 469-72 ; (20 E. III.) 474-
5-85 ; (10 H. VI.) 496-500

Grey, John dc (21 H. III.)
417-24; (4* H. III.) 230;
(50 H. III.) 233; (32 E. I.)
260; (20 E. III.) 474-5;
(21 E. III.) 486; (6 H. VI.)
485-6, 490

Reginald, his son, iV/.

Grey, Reginald (21 H. III.)
4IS; (sTieriff) (53 H. III.)
234 ; (21 E. I.) 479

Grey, Rich (13 H. III.) 199;
(mother of) (21 H. III.) 4^8-
42; (22 H. III.) 459-61 ;
(27 H. III.) 445 ; (38 H. III.)
222; (43 H. III.) 228; (30
E. I.) 472; (4 E. 11.) 465;
(20 E. III.) 475 ; (13 II. IV.)
484; of Wilton (10 H. VI.)
496

Grey, Rich, heirs of, 7 £. i, 241
Rich m Rich, 8 E. I, 242
Rich fil Isolde, 31 H. 3,
215

Grey, Rich fil Win. (6 E. I.)
240; (18 E. I.) 250

Grey, Robt. (22 H. III.) 461 ;
(27 H. III.) 427

Grey, Walter, 31 E. i, 260

* „ Wm. (33 H. III.) 217 ;
(34 H. III.) 218 ; (36 H. III.)
220; (39 H. III.) 223; (43
II. III.) 227; (44 H. III.)
230; (II E. II.) 452; (20
E. III.) 474-5-86 ; (21 E. III.)
481

Grey, heirs of the Lord of
Shirland, 13 H. 4, 484

Greynford, Rich, 11 £. 2, 452

Greystock^ Hugo, 6 H. 6, 493

Gridling, Adam (12 H. III.)
411; (19 H. III.) 206; (22
H. III.) 460

Griffen, 34 H. 2, 135

Griffith, Thos., 6 H. 6, 493
„ Walter, 6 H. 6, 493

Grim, Wm., 13 H. 3, 196

Grimesley, Gilb., 43 H. 3, 227
Gringeley, Hugo, 24 E. i, 253
„ Simon (18 E. I.)
250; (II E. II.) 452
Grove, Galf, Clareburg, II E. 2,

452
Gruff, John fil Henry, 32 E. i,

261

))

>f

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Grunbald, Rich. (C. J. of Eng-
land) 346

Matilde, his wife, id,
Gudherd, Simon, 22 H. 3, 208
Guile, Stephen fil Amald, 17 H.

3. 204
Gulbert, 48, 59
Gule, Robt., 9 J., 173
Galichli, Adam, 4 J., 154
Gumbert of Kirkton, 316
Gunaldeston, Durand, 21 II. 2,

118
Gundeville, Agnes, 9 J., 172
Gundy, Thos., 13 E. i, 246
GUNNOR, THE DUCHESS,

284
Gunt, Wm., 13 E. i, 246
Gunton, Hugo, 12 J., 177
Gunthorpe, Ralf, 14 £. i, 247
Gurry, Nic, Boilston, ii E. 2,

452-4
Gyun, Galf (12 H. III.) 411 ;

(24 H. III.) 199; (28 H. III.)

212
Gyun, Hy., 43 H. 3, 227

„ Peter, 10 H. 3, 195

„ Galf, fV/.

„ Wm. (38 H. III.) 221 ;

(41 H. III.) 222
Guy, Hy., 10 H. 6, 505
Gyfortz (see Jorce) 21 H. 3,

420
Gyseleir, Walter, 48 H. 3, 232
Matilda, his wife

Hacon, 41, 60 dis, 61 ; (25 H.

II.) 124 ; Parcr. (6 R. I.) 136
Haccon, Isabel, i J., 146
Hadfield, John, 6 J., 162-
Haddon, Engelram, 22 H. 2,

119
Haddon, Hugh (32 H. II.) 121 ;

(R. I.) 294
Haddon, Hugh, Tickhill, 4 J.,

»55
Haddon, Nic, 18 H. 3, 205

Simon, 46 H. 3, 231

Tom, 9 H. 3, 193

Hadsop, Alex., 9 J., 173

Hage, Hugo, 2 H. 3, 410

„ Wm., 27 H. 3, 427
Haghc, Rad fil Wm., 48 H. 3,

232
Hagh, Wm. (23 H. III.) 207 ;

(36 H. III.) 220; (13 E. I.)

246
Haijrhorpe, Alan, 48 H. 3, 233
HAIA, HAYA—
Haya, Hugo, brother of Rich.,

314
Haya, Nic, (6 H. III.) 189 ; (c.

H. I.) 314; Hugo, his bro-
ther

t9

it

Haia, Rich., Bulwell, 18 H. 3

205
Haia, Robert (1112) 326; 25

H. 3, 211
Haia, Walter (3 J.) 153; (5 J.)

160; (6 J.) 164; (8 J.)

171-2
Haia, Wm., 34 H. 3, 218
Haleshope, Gamel, 21 H. 2, 117 .
Hal^eton, Omfray, 13 H. 4, 484
Halida, Swein, 34 H. 2, 135
Halington, Gilbert fil John, 37

H. 3, 221
Hall, Wm., 10 H. 6, 502

,, Robt. of the (Osmundes-

ton) 10 H. 6, 507
Hally,John (14 H. III.) 200;

(13 H. IV.) 484
Hally, Oliver, 10 H. 6, 501
„ Wm., -lo H. 6, 501-2
„ Wm., cousin of Wm., 21

E. I, 252
Halton, Ralf fil Nic, 22 H. 3,

208
Halum, Alexr. fil Ralf. (9 H.

III.) 193 ; (13 H. III.) 196
Halum, Beatrice ux Philip, San-

diacre, 7 R. I, 386
Halum, Godfrey, 6 H. 6, 486
„ Henry de West, 39 H.

3. 223
Halum, Ralf (43 H. III.) 226-7 ;

(46 H. III.) 2.?I
Halum, Robert (sheriff) 44 H.

3, 230
Haluton, Wm., 50 H. 3, 234
Hamburg, Hy., 6 H. 6, 492
Haraelton, Adam fil Adam, 24 '

E. I, 253
Hamellon, Wm. (9 E. I.) 243

dis ; (32 £. I.) 260
Hamwyk, Nic, 18 E. i, 250
Hamerwych, Ralf (Certif.) 336
Hamesclape, Hugo, 5 H. 2,

104
Hampton, Hugh, 12 E. I, 245
Walter „
John, 21 H. 3, 412
Thos,, 10 H. 6, 503
Hampstead, Jul. fil Roger, 27

H. 3, 428
Ham wake, Nic, Propos., 11 E.

2, 452 (see Hamwye)
Handisacre, Robt. (35 H. III.)

220; (4E. I.) 239
Handisacre, Robt., Alina, his

wife, 31 H. 3, 215
Hanleye, Hugo, 25 E. I, 254
HANSELIN (SEE HAUN-

SELIN, ANSELIN, ASCE-

LIN)—
Hanselin, Agnes fil Thos., i E.

1,238
Hanselin, Goisfred, 313-23, 347,

354

,»

INDEX OF PERSONS.

539

Hanselin, Ralf (31 H. I.) 97 ;
(Certif.) 313-6; f7 H. II.)
105-6; (II H. II.) 107; (14
H. II.) 109 his J no; (dead
17 H. II.) 328; (18 H. II.)

114
HanseliD, Thos. (16 H. III.)

201 ; (55 H. III.) 232
Hanseiin, Wm. (c. H. II.) 314;

(13 J.) I7»; (37 H. III.)

221
Hanton, Nic, 13 H. 2, 109
Harald (de Lee) 4 H. 2, 103
Harang, Alice, 34, H. 3, 218
Harcla, Mathew, 302
H A R C O U R r, HEKIZ-

COURT, HEINCOURT—
Harcourt, Ivo de (Certif.) 291
Harcourt, John de (D.) 284

Wm. (1198)389; (14

T.) 179; (4 E. II.) 464; (20

E. III.) 475
Hardi, Ralf, Saldeford, 12 H.

3. »97
Hardeley, Brian, 18 E. I, 250

Hardreshill = HerthiU

Hardreshill, Bertha, 27 H. 3,

432
Hardreshill, Rich. (17 H. III.)

204; (22 H. III.) 208; (II

E. II.) 451 ; ofCIaworth (14

H. III.) 199
Hardreshill, Robt. (4 E. I.) 238;

(24 E. I.) 253
Hardreshill, Robt. ill Rich., 14

E. I, 247 ; and
Bertha, ,,

Hardreshill, Robt. fil Wm. (lO

H. III.) 194; (c. R. II.) loi
Hardreshill, Wm., brother of

Hugo fil Robt., 13 J., 179 bfs
Hardreshill, Wm. de (1198) 388 ;

(16 J.) 180; (6H. III.) loi,

386,399; ("oH. III.) 194
Hardreshill, Wm. fil Hugh (i

J.) loi
Hardreshill, Wm. (31 H. III.)

lOI

Hardhevedde, Jo., 33 H. 3, 21 7
„ Simon, 55 H. 3,

236

Hugo, his brother
Hard wick = Scapwic fam.
Hardwick, Johp (Sieynesby) 21

E. 3» 481
Hardwick, Wm. fil Ralf, 330 ;

(10 H. VI.) 496, 503
Hare), Rich., 12 H. 2, 108
HARESTAN, HORESTAN
Horestan, Peter, 43 H. 3, 227
Robert (4 J.) 155; (5

J.) 159; (12 J.) 176; (6 H.

III.) 189; (27 H. III.) 434-40
Horestan, Roger fil Wm., 10 11.

3,195

Horestan, Wm. (16 J.) l8i ; (3

H. III.) 184
Hareton, Wm., 4 E. i, 239
Hargrave, Galf, 34 H. 3, 135
„ Gilbert, id,
„ Hugo (22 H. III.)

460; (31 E. I.) 259
Hargrave, Rob., 3 H. 3, 185
Harlegh, Malcolm (28 E. I.)

258 J (30 E. I.) 259; (II E.

n.) 454
Harlaston, John de (i J.) 302
„ Wm. (6 J.) 302

Amicia, his wife
Harper, 14 J., 400

„ Wm. le, 31 H. I, 97
Harreby, Jo., 21 H. 3, 420
HARRINGTON, EARLS OF,

284
Harrington, John (sheriff) 24-6

E. I, 253
Hartecla, Will, 31 E. i, 259
Harthorpe, Peter (1252) 351
Harton, Adam, 5 J., 160
Harworth, Wm., 39 H. 3, 224
Hasard, Thos. fil. Wm., 31 E.

I, 260
Haselbec, Samps., 32 H. 3,

216
Haselhurst, Robt., Sparkhill, 10

H. 6, 496
Haspard, Roger (2 J.) 148 ; (3

J.) 152
Hasshe, Andrew, Alwaston, 27

E. I, 255
Hastenot, Wm., 32 H. 3, 216
Hastings, Aitrop (Certif.) 321
Hy., 28 H. 3, 212
Ada, id.
,, Henry fil Henry (27

H. m.) 432-4; (II E. IL)
451 ; (44 H. in.) 229
Hastings, Hugh (qy. Hy.) 6 J.,

167
Hastings, Jdhn (22 H. III.)

463; (58"H.in.)235
Hastings, John fil John, 28 E. I,

257
Hastings, Laurence, 6 H. 6, 495
Margia, 2 H. 3, 410
Milo, 43, H. 3, 228
Nich. (34 II. HI.)
218; (31 E. L) 259
Hastings, Robert, 34 H. 3, 217
„ Thos., 6 H. 6, 493
„ Wm. (Certif.) 305
Hat el, John, 8 H. 3, 190
Haterist, 12 H. 2, 108
Hatrop, Maen (Certif.) 321
Hatton, Alex., 12 J., 176
„ Peter, H. 2, 276
Hausted, Juliana fil Robt., and
„ Robert (27 H. HI.)
427; (34 H. in.) 218; (30
E.L) 470-7; (4 E. II.) 464

>»

»>

)»

i»

t>

Hauvill, Glib., 4 H. 3, 186 bis
„ Ralf, 3 H. 3. 183

Hauward, Wm. (Justice) 23 E.
1.253

Haveburg, John, 35 H. 3, 220

Haveiseth, Hugo, 13 J., 179
„ Math. 318; (12 H.

in.) 195, 339, 411 ; (21 H.

in.) 417-24; (27 H. in.)
448; (31 H. in.) 215; (35

H. III.) 219; (38 H. in.)

222; (43 H. III.) 228; (44
H. III.) 229; (7 E. L) 241;
(I3E.L)246; (15 E. I.) 247;
(16 E. L) 248
Haverseth, heirs of Mathew, 22
H. 3, 461
Ulf, ancestor of this family,

317
Havershegg, Roger, 18 H. 3,

'97
Haversham, Hugo (7 J.) 170;

(13 J.) 178; (16 J.) 182; (3
H. in.) 185; (8 H. III.)
192; (13 H III.) 198; (14
H. in.) 200; (16 H. in.)
202 ; (38 H. in.) 222 ; (i3
H. in.) 228; (7 E. L) 241 ;
(15 E. L)247
Havershiilm, Monks of, 14 J.,

402
Hawise, Simon, 17 H. 3, 204
Hayhni, Nich, Beskwood, li E.

2,452
Hayles, Wm., 16 E. I, 248
Haylove, Nic, 31 E. i, 260
Hayra, Walter, 21 H. 3, 421
Hayton, Adam (4 J.) 154; (27

H. in.) 432

Wm. fil Adam, 392 »

Hayton, Wm. fil Alan (?) 34 E.

I, 262
Heanor, John, 50 H. 3, 233
„ Nic (39 H. in.) 223 ;
fil Thos. (27 H. in.) 444
Heanor, Thorn, 8 ii. 3, 190
Heckham, Her vie, 46 H. 3, 230

Isolde, his wife, id.
Heckham, John, 9 E. I, 243
„ Keg, 20 H. 2, 116
„ Gerard, I E. 1, 237
HEDDON AND HEDUN,

(see Haddon)
Htdun, Hugo (4 T.) 156 ; (5 J.)

160; (6 J.) 166, 391
Hedun, Ivo (R. B.) 391
Hedon, Robt. (12 J.) 177 ; (32
H. HI.) 216; (44 H. Ill)
229
Hedon, Simon (sheriff) (21 H.
in.) 418-21-36-7; (32 H.
in.) 216; (43 M. III.) 226-
9; (44 H. in.) 230; (53 H.

HI.) 234

Gerard, his son

S40

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Hedon, Thos. (12 J.) 177; (21

H. III.) 413
Hedesferes, Sarra, 7 J., 280

Hedul, 46

Held win, Wm., 34 H. 2, 135

Heic, Robt, 30 H. 3, 214

Helewis, Half, 27 H. 3, 444

Heling, Walter, 53 H. 3. 235

Heliun, Walt., 9 J., 173

Helsby's Cheshire, 299-300

Hemetar, I H. 2, 99

Hemedeston, Win., 5 J., 157

Hemingburg, Kelve, 5 E. i, 240

Hemingellune, Swein, 12 H. 2,

108
Hemington, Rich., 53 H. 3,235
Hemingworth, Robt., 6 E. i, 240
Hemodeston, Sunnolfe, 12 H. 2,

108
Henna, a Jewess, 11 E. 2, 452
Hendeshiil, Rog., 48 H. 3, 233
Hengham, R., 7 E. I, 241
Henry, clic, Tadington, 28 E.

I, 258 ; cleric, Egmanton, 12

H. 3, 197 ; Vicar of Yolgreve,

10 H. 6, 500
Henry fil Henry, 32 H. 3, 216

„ le Clerk, 50 H. 3, 233 ;

Juvenis, Sandiacre, 27 H. 3,

427
Herbert (see Fitz Herbert)
Herbert, 46

Wm., 4 E. I, 239
the Forester, 26 H. 2,

125
Herburer, Wm., 3 H. 3, 185

Herbcrour, Wm. fil Wm. (12 E.

I.) 245; (30 E. I.) 472; (20

E. HI.) 475
Herdeby, Wm. (28 E. I.) 257 ;

(II E. II.) 454

Herdeberg, Galf, 48 H. 3, 232

Herder, German le, Peak, 29 E.

h 259
Herdelawe, Robt., I E. i, 238

Herecy, Malvesinus (ii J.) 175 ;
(14 H. HI.) 201; (21 H. III.)
412-8-23 ; (27 H. in.) 432-6 ;

(33 H. III.) 286, 335
Theophania, his wife, it/,

Hereford, Ann, ux Ralf, 37 H.

3, 221
Hereford, Hy., heirs of, 40 H.

3i 225
Hereford, Peter, 9 II. 3, 193
„ Rad (12 H. II.) 108;

(15H. II.) Ill ; (19 H. HI.)

207; (27 H. III.) 441
Hereford, Wm., 5 J., 158
Hereward, 15 H. 2, iii

„ Rob., 2 J., 148

Herfast, of Normandy, 284
Herin, Wm., 2 H. 3, 410
Heriz, Adelizn, wo. of Wm., 26

H. 2, 292

•>

ft

Heriz, Henr. (44 H. III.) 230 ;

(46 H. III.) 231
Heriz, Hugo (21 H. III.) 415 ;

(20 E. I.) 251 dis} fil John.

(1247) S9» 349
Heriz, Ivo, 96 ; (31 H. I.) 97 J
(1 133) 291-2-17-3. 324; (of
Grava)35i ; (10 R.) 145; (i
J.) 146; (2 J.) i5o;(3j.)i53;

(4 J.) 154-5-6; (5J-) 159; (6
J.) 164; (7 J.) 170; (8 J.)
171; (13 J.) 178; (16 J.)
181 bis, 182; (3 H. III.) 184
(5H. III.) 188; (6 H. III.)
189 ; (8 H. III.) 190-2 ; (14
H. III.) 199; (19 H. III.)
206 ; (20 H. III.) 207
Emma, his wife, 96

Heriz, John (D.) 284; (9 H.
III.) 193; (10 H. III.) 349;
(1275) 351 ; (13 H. III.) 196-
8; (14 H. HI.) 200; (15 H.
III.) 201; (16 H. III.) 202;
(20 H. III.) 207; (21 H. III.)
414-5-18-9; (22 H. III.) 460-
I ; (26 H. III.) 211; (27 H.
III.) 442; (30 H. III.) 214;
(36 H. III.) 220; (38 H. III.)
222; (43 H. III.) 228; (I E.
I.) 228; (7 E. I.) 241; (15
E. I.) 247; (19 E. I.) 251;
(E. I.)349; (30 E. I.)47o-5

Heriz, John fil John (31 E. I.)
260 ; (33 E. I.) 261 ; (4 E.
II.) 464

Heriz, Leon de, 12 J., 177
,, Matilde, wo. of Ivo ux
Ralf fil Simon, 349

Heriz, Matilde, 33 H. 3, 216

„ Rad (7 J.) 167; (9 J.) 172

„ Rich, Winfield, 5 H. 3,

187-8
Heriz, Rich fil Galfry, 33 H. 3,

217
Heriz, Robt., 96, 350; (1102)

291; (H, II.) 292; (15 H.

II.) Ill; (17 H. II.) 1 13-4;

(i9H.II.)ii5-6/;/>; (22 H.

II.) 119 ; (23 II. II.) 121 dis ;

(25 H. II.) 123; (26H. II.)

127 ; (29 H. 1 1.) 130; (10 R.

I.) 145 ; (« J) M6
Herii, Wm. (Certif.) 320 ; (15

H. II.) 111,350; (I7n. II.)

113, 114; (21 H. III.) 420;

(27 H. III.) 439
Heriuin; Walter, 31 H. 3,

215

Herman, of Osdnton, 16 H. 2,

112
Herni, 266

Herovill, Robt.de, 15 H. 2, ill
Hcrt, Hugo, 55 H. 3, 236

,, Ralf fil Henry (qy. Heriz)

i>f Crich, 351

Hert, Walter, 17 H. 3, 203
Herthill, Ad. (16 H. III.) 203 ;

(18 H. III.) 205
Herthill, Christian, 43 H. 3, 227

Agnes, his daughter
Herthill, Rich.(i2H. III.)4ii ;

(27 H. III.) 444 ; (30 E. I.)

470; (20 E. III.) 477
Herthill, Robert, 22 H. 2, 118
Hertington, John, 13 H. 4, 484
Hertshome, Hy., (22 H. III.)

208; (27 H. III.) 444; (39

H. III.) 223; (40 H. III.) 225
Hert well == Herthill, 169
„ Adam, 17 H. 3, 203
„ Barnabas (8 J.) 172;

(9 J.)»V/.; (13 J.) 178-9; (16
J.)i8i; (3H. III.) 185; (8
H. III.) 192; (13 H. III.)
198; (14 H. III.) 199

Hertwell, Waller (30 H. III.)
214 ^w 169; (6 J.) 164; (13
H. III.) 198; (14 H. III.)
200 ^s ; (16 H. II.) 20^ ; (18
H. III.) 205; (38 H. III.)
222 ; (43 H. IIL) 228 ; (6 £.
I.) 240; (7 E. I.) 241; (15
E. I.) 247

Hertwell, Rd. (37 H. III.) 221 ;
(10 E. I.) 244

Hertwell, heirs of Walter, 7 J.,
170

Hervey, Rich., 13 E. i, 245
„ Robert, 43 H. 3, 227
„ Wm. (20 E. III.) 487;
(6 H. VI.) 486

Hese, Robt. (13 J.) 178 ; (16 J.)
181 ; (3 H. III.) 185 ; (8 H.
III.) 192; (13 H. III.) 198;
(14 H. III.) 200; (16 H. III.)
202; (30 H. III.) 215; (38
H. III.) 222; (43 H. III.)
228; (15 E. I.) 247

Hether, Jo., Bancwell, ii E. 2,

452
Hetcona, Kalf, 21 H. 2, 117

Hetcote, Godfrey, 12 H. 2, 108

„ Wm., 10 H. 6, 499

Heton, Ad., 391

„ Robt., 36 H. 3, 220
Hetton, Gilbert, 22 H. 2, 119

„ John, 21 H. 3, 421
Ileywick, Rich. (18 E. I.) 250;

(II E. II.) 452
Hibaldeston, Wm. fil Eudo, 313
Hickling, John, 10 H. 6, 502

Roger (2 J.) 149; (3

J.) 152
Hickling, Roger fil Robert, 31

H. 2, 131
Hickling, Wm. fil Wm., 14 H.

3. 201
Hide, Wm., li E. 2, 452
Hill, Adam, 1 1 E. 2, 452

„ Galfry, 1 1 E. 2,452

Hill, Hugo, lo H. 3, 195

„ John (6 £. II.) 468; (10

H. VI.) 500
Hill Rich., 5 H. 3, 187 bis,

,, Robert (46 H. III.) 330;

(II E. II.) 452; (loH. VI.)

510
Hill, Robt. fil Henry, 5 E. 1,

240
Hill, Thomas, Chesterfield, 1 1

E. 2, 452
Hilliar, Rich., 25 H. 3, 210
Hilton, John, 10 H. 6, 506-10

„ Roger, Cliston, 14 H. 3,

197
Hindeston, Wm., 2 J., 148
Hoc, Swein, 12 H. 2, 108
Hochhanger, Galf, 4 E. i, 239
Hocknorton, Jo., 16 H. 3, 203

Rc^er, his brother, ul.
Hockover, Roger (25 H. III.)

211 ; (28 H. III.) 213
Hockover, Robt., id.
Hocreion, John, 5 E. 1, 240
Hocton, Pagan fil Wm., 345
Hodsac, Thomas, 27 H. 3, 432
„ Warin, 34 H. 2, 135
Hodesac, Wm., 31 H. 3, 215
Hodynct, Odo, 21 E. 3, 481
Hogge, Hugo, 4 E. I, 239
Hoga, Rich, 32 H. 2, 132
Hoiland, Ralf fil Step., 329-30
„ Magr Simon, 24 H. 3,

260
Hoiland, Swein (13 H. II.)

109 ; (22 H. II.) 119
Hoiland, Wm., 17 H. 2, 112
Hoketon, Henry, 36 H. 3, 220
Hokeston, Robert, 23 H. 2, 121
Hokesworth, Wm. de (Moun)

46 H. 3, 231
Holbec, Hugo, 27 H. 3, 432
Rog., II J., 175
Wm., 27 H. 3. 432
Holbrook, Roger, 14 J., 398
„ Wm., I E, I, 238

Holderness, Jo. (Thornton) 48

H. 3, 232
Holen, To., 15 H, 3, 201
Holland, Hy., 10 H. 6, 504
HOLLAND, JOHA., COUN-
TESS, 10 H. 6. 503
Holland, John (Chev.) (13 H.

IV.) 484; (6 H. VL) 490;

(10 H. VI.) 509-10
Holland, Thos., 21 E. I, 481
Holme, John fil Rich, 4 H. 3,

187

Hopkinson, Jo., 10 H. 6, 499
Hopton, John, 10 H. 6, 496
Hoppa, Robert (19 H. II.) 115-

118; (23 H. n.) 121
Horberg, Ralf, 50 H. 3, 233
Hore, Robt. fil Peter le, 17 E.

I, 249

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Horseden, Wm., 44 H. 3, 229
Horsingdon, John, 12 J., 177
Horsley, Thom. (cap.) 25 E. I,

254
Hortedune, 37

Hortishorn, Wm., 22 H. 3, 463
Horton, Alice, wo. of Roger,

10 H. 6., 504
Horton, Roger (13 H. IV.) 484 ;

(6 H. VI.) 490
Horton, William (20 E. III.)

486; (loH. VL)504
HOSE, HOUSE, HOSATO—
HQsato, Adam, 11 E. 2, 452

„ Henry (2 H. IF.) 10 1 ;

(Certif.) 305; (5 J.) 16 1 ; (7

J.) 170; (21 H. III.) 421
A vice Tison, his wife
Hosato, Hugh, 13 H. 4, 484

„ John (Oxton) (20 E. I.)

251 ; (10 H. VI.) 506
Hosato, Rich, 10 H. 6, 506

Wm. (7 J.) 170.1 ; (13

J.) 178-9; (16 J.) 181; (3

H. III.) 185; (14 H. III.)

200; (13 H. III.) 198; (16

H. III.) 202; (30 H. IH.)

214 kis ; (43 H. III.) 228 ; (7

E. I.) 241 ; (is E. L) 247
Hospitallers of Jerusalem (3 H.

IH.) 185; (27 H. in.) 432
Hostarius, see Ostarius
Hostric, John, 27 H. 3, 428

„ Rich, 27 H. 3, 427
Hoton, Rich, 22 H. 2, 119 (see

Hocton)
Hotot, Fulc, 27 H. 3, 436

,, Henry (i J.) 147; (11

J. 175; (I E. I-) 2375 (13

E. I.) 245
Hotot, Hugo, 2 J., 148

„ Robert (27 H. III.) 447 ;

(43 H. IIL) 226-7
Hotot, Wm. (37 H. III.) 221 ;

(31 E. L)26o
Hotot, Wm. (Chelingoc) 35 H.

3,220
Houkesworth, Laurence, 34 II.

2, 134
Houkesword, Alexr., 25 H. 2,

124
Houiton, Hugo, 32 H. 2. 132
Houeton, Nose fil Ailmer, 44

H. 3, 230
Houton, Rich, i E. i, 238
Hoveden's Works, 368
Hoveden, Stephen, 34*E, i, 262
Hoveringham, A vice, wo. of

Rf^ger, 43 H. 3, 227
Hoveringham, Magr. Rich, 30

E. I, 2C9
Hoveringham, Hugh (13 H. II.)

109 ; (21 H. III.) 420
Hoveringham, Simon, 40 H. 3,

228

tt

»>

»•

54'

Howe, Roger, 10 D. 6, 509
Hu, le Cleric, 26 H. 2, 125
HUBERT. ARCHBISHOP

WALTER, his reforms, 14,

ZZ, 90-i» 268, 363, 365, 431
Hubleyn, Thos., 10 H. 6, 498
HUCCENEL (SERJEANTV)

428
Huccenel, Gilbert, 25 H. 2, 124
Hucknal, Hy., 5 J., 159

„ Roger, 12 H. 2, 108
„ Waller (27 E. I.)

25s; (II E. IL) 452
Hucklow, Wm. fil Walter, 11

E. 2, 453
Huddledene, Wm., 22 H. 3,

208
Hugh, de Weston, 27 H. 3, 440

„ the Prior (4 H. II.) 104 ;

(5 H. II.) 104-6
Hugh, le Provost (53 H. IH.)

235 ; Rector of Kjrkston (11

E. 11)453
Hull, John de, 48 H. 3, 232
Hullock, Hy. (Middleton), 43

H. 3, 227
Hulmo, Jacob, 33 H. 2, 133
Ralf, 40 H. 3, 224
Serlode, 12 H. 2, 108
Wm. (28 H. IL) 128;

(32 H. IL) 133; (5 J.) 146-7
Hulton, Cecil, 5 H. 3. 188
Humage, John fil, 13 H. 3, 199
Humblecuiiible, Simon, 6 J.,

164
Nic and Wm., id,
Humphry M agister, c. J., 97
Hundinc, 52,
Hundulf, 26, 53
Hunfred, 4 H. 2, 103
Hungersel, John, 5 E. I, 240

(See Hinkersell)
Hunt, Alice, wo. of Roger, (10

H. VL)509; (34 H. in.) 219
Hunt, Benj., Nottm. (bailiff) 12

E. I, 244
Hunt, Hy., 28 E. i, 257

„ Rad fil Wm. le, 53 H. 3,

235
Hunt, Robt., 6 H. 6, 493

„ Thomas, ui.

Huntback's Vernon ped., 302

Hunter, Mr., 17

HUNTINGDON, THE EARL

5 Jm 328

Henry, his son
Huniingfield, Rann, 28 E. i,

257
Huniingfield, Wm. (2 H. III.)

416 ; (18 E. I.) 250
Hurlingburc, 294
Huton, Hy., 55 H. 3, 237
Huteman, Rich., 23 E. i, 252
Hutton, Roger, fil Roger fil

Step., 1 1 E. 2, 453

542

Hyde, Jo. (21 E. III.) 479 ; (10

H. Vl.)496, 500
Hyde, Nic, 10 H. 6, 500
Hykling, Jo., 10 H. 6, 496
Hyman, Thos., 10 H. 6, 501

Ibul, Jordan, 351 bis ; sec Ybul
Ikeling. Wm. fil Will, 43 H. 3,

227
Ilkeston, Thos., Propositus, 39

H. 3, 224
John ,, id.

Ingehain, Wm., 46 H. 3, 230
Ingerby, Wm., 26 E. i, 254

Alhreda, his wife ,,
Ingelram, 87
Ingram, 64 bis

Ingram, Frances, 10 H. 6, 508
„ John (20 E. I.) 251 ;

(34 E. I.) 262
Ingram, Laur, (40 H. III.) 224 ;

(4 E. I.) 238
Ingram, Laur fil Laur, 53 H. 3,

234
Ingram, Ranulf fil, 336

„ Richard fil, 12 J., 176
„ Rich fil Rich, 32 H. 3,
216
Ingram, Robert fil, II E. 2, 455
„ Robert, heirs of Robert,
(27 H. III.) 427 ; (27 H. III.)
442 ; (28 H. HI.) 212 ; (34
H. III.) 218; (34 E. I.) 262
Ingram, Robert, Nottm., (22 H.

III.) 208 ; (20 E. Ill ) 475
Ingwardby, Wm., 13 H. 4,

484
Innocens, Clerics, 2 J., I48
Insrich, Adam fil, 12 £. i, 244
Insula, Bald, 43 H. 3, 228
„ Brian, 346, 387, 391, (II

J.) 174; (12 J.) 177 J {14 J.)

397-9.403; (17 J.) '82; (7

H. III.) 189; (14 H. III.)

200
Insula, Brian, heirs of (19 H.

III.) 206; (26 H. III.) 211
Insula, Herbert, 22 H. 3, 208
„ Hugo fil, 12 J., 177
„ Hugo (10 R. I.) 145;

(I J.) 146; (4 J.) 156; (5 J.)

159; (6 J.) 164; (8 J.) 172;

(8H. III.) 191 ; (13 H. III.)

199; (21 H. III.) 420; (30

H. III.) 214
Insula, heirs of Hugo, 3 H. 3,

185
Insula, Jordan, 29 E. i, 258

Alice, his wife „

Insula, Nich (i £. I.) 238; (24

E. I.) 253; (11 E. 2)452
Insula, Nic, Kirkby, 16 E. I,

248

INDEX OF PERSONS.
Insula, Reginald (22 H. IT.)

"9; 343,346, 356; (12 H.

III.) 411
Insula, Robert, Kirkby, 346
„ Warner, 267 ; (11 H.

II.) 107; (14 H. n.) 109
Ippeston, Alice, 53 H. 3, 235
Ippestan, Jo., 14 J.» 180
Ireland, Ralf, 30 E. I, 470

„ Robert (20 E. III.) 475 ;

(13 H. IV.) 484; (6 H.VI.)

486; (10 H. VI.)5o8.io
Ireland, Wm., 20 E. 3, 470*86
Ireton, Ad., 31 E. i., 260
Margaret, his wife ,,
Ireton, John, 10 H. 6, 510
„ Wm., 40 H. 3, 225

Jaspeynbill, Wm., 6 H. 6, 493
Jassop, Wm., 35 H. 3, 220
J ere, Ankerus, 10 H. 6, 503
Jerusalem Hosp., 5 J., 161
Jewitt, Llewellynn, 4, 5, 10, 16,

«6, 273
Jocelyn, de Scapwick, 330
Joscelin, Wm., brother of, 6 J.,

163
Johanna, Queen of England, 13

H. 4, 48 ♦
John, 45i 46
John, Clic, 20 H. 2, 116
Jolyf, Robt., Ekington, 21 E. 3,

480
Jonesman, John, 1 1 E. 2, 454
Jordan, Hy., 55 H. 3, 237
Margerie, his wife „
Jordan. Wm., 10 H. 6, 507
Jorz family, 331

„ Elias, 44 H. 3, 230

„ Galf (7 J.) 167 ; (21 H.

III.) 420
Jorz, Maiilde, 43 H. 3, 227

„ Rich., 27 H. 3, 439

„ Robt. (26 E. I.) 255; (6

E. II.) 468

Emma, his wife, 255
Jorz, Stephen, 44 H. 3, 229
Jort, Rann, and Cecil, his wife,

32 H. 3, 216
Jort, Robert de, 8 H. 2, 106
Joseph, cleric, 12 J., 176
Joslem, Walter, 14 J., 180
Juvene, Nic le, Derby, 53 H.

3,235

Kaha, Wm., 12 J., 176
Kaldwell, Barth, 43 H. 3, 227
Kalsover, Robert, 3 H. 3, 184
Kampton, Arthur, 33 H. 3, 217
Kardvill, Hy., 27 H. 3, 445
,, Regl. (under-sheriff) 5
J-, '57

Karlelon, Prior of, 8 H. 3, 190
Karlstorp, Henry, 5 E. I, 240
Kaskin, Wm., $ H. 3, 188
Katclive, Peter, 8 J., 171
Kay, Simon, 12 E. i, 245
Kays, Gilbert, 10 H. 6, 508

„ Rad, 6 H. 6, 486

,, Rich, 10 H. 6, 503-8
Kaysethorpe, Jordan, 48 H. 3,

232 bis
Keggeworth, John, 43 H. 3, 228
Keke, Robt. de, 55 H. 3, 237
Keldoc, Elia.s 2 J., 149
Kellesholt, Elzth., wo. of Roger,

13 E. I, 246
Kellesholt, Robt., 10 H. 3, 195
„ Wm., II E. 2,452

Keleshalt, Roger, 44 H. 3, 229
KELHAM, KELUM—
Kelham, Hugh fil Roger, 43 H.

3, 227

Beatrice, his wife
Kelham, Peter, 27 H. 3, 437
,, Richard, 5 E. I, 240
,, Peter fil Peter, 43 H.

3, 226
Kelham, Robt. fil Hy., 4S H.

3,232
Kelham, Tecendis,34 H. 2, 135
Waller (48 H. III.)

232; (55 H. III.) 237
Kelham, Wm., 28 H. 2, 128
Kemble, W., 7, 10
Kemp, Mr., 53 H. 3. 235
Ken, Magr. Hy. le, 53 H. 3, 235

„ Rann, 7 E. i, 241

„ Wm., of Radcliff, 46 H.

3, 231
Kendale, Alice fil Wm., 29 E.

1, 258

Kenesley, Robt., 10 H. 6, 509
Kenet, Hugh, 55 H. 3, 236
Kenewryc, of Southwell, 37 H.

3, 221

Henry, his brother, id,
Keresmere, Hy., 39 H. 3, 223
Keriel, Philip. 5 E. I, 240
Robert, his brother , ,
Keriel, Rich. (53 H. III.) 235 ;

(7 E. I.) 241
Keriel, Wm., 27 H. 3, 439
Kerneille, Swein de ia, 22 H.

2, 121

Kesteven, Robt. (27 E. I.) 257 ;

(II E. II.) 454
Ketelbin, Rich, fil, 4 H. 3, 187
Ketelston, Alured, 18 H. 2, 115

bis
Keterych, Wm., to H. 6, 502
Key worth, Godfr, 46 H. 3. 231
Kide, Am, 34 H. 2, 135
Kidwald, Wm. fil Ingram, 55

H. 3, 237
Kiderwalde, Hy., 10 H. 3, 195
Kilbel, Robt., 1 1 H. 3, 203

INDEX OF PERSONS.

543

Kilburn, Adam, 9 H. 3, 193
„ Andrew, 25 H. 2, 124
„ Kad fil Rad, 4 £. 1, 239
Kille, Wm., 41 H. 3, 226
Kilmington, \Vm. fil Robert, 13

E. I, 245
KIMB, KIME, KYME—
Kime, Philip (5 H. II.) 104-6
^>; ("63)329; (14 J.) 180;
(8 H. III.) 191 ; (13 H. III.)
198; (14 H III.) 200; (15
H. III.) 201 ; (16 H. III.)
202 ; (30 H. III.) 214-5 » (38
H. III.) 222; (43 H. III.)
228 ; (7 E. I.) 241 ; (IS E.
I.) 247 ; and see 96
Kime, Simon de, 96; (13 J.)
178; (16 J.) 182; (13 H. III.)
199
Kime, Simon fil Wm., H. 2, 92
„ Robt., 21 £. I, 252
„ Wm., 6J., 167
Kinctwich, Robt., 4 E. i, 239
Kingsbond, Walter, 7 J., 170
Kingesle, Rich., 14 £. i, 246
Kingesleye, Rich, de, 24 E. I,

253

Kingston, Alice fil John, 55 H.

3.237
Kingston, Math, fil Math., 50

H. 3, 234
Kirkby, John, a Judge, 458
„ Rich., Barton (32 E.

I.) 260; (II E. II.) 455
Kirkelston, Wm. fil Wm., 55

H. 3, 236
Kirkham, Alan, 392

Walter (22 H. III.)

208; (31 H. III.) 215
Kirkholmston, Gilb., 27 H. 3,

438
Kirkman, Rich., 11 R. 2, 452
Kirketon, Henry, 34 E. i, 262
Kirkton, John, 55 H. 3, 237
Kitte, Adam, Nottingham (44

H. III.) 230 ; (48 H. III.) 232
Kitte, Henry (16 H. III.) 203 ;

(19 H. III.) 207
Knesale, Ralf, 27 IF. 3, 440
Knestan, Wm., 18 E. i, 250
Knittel, Robt., i E. I, 238

Alina, bis wife
Knivesmith, 14 E. i, 246
Sibella, his wife, id.
Kniveton, Alice, 21 H. 3, 421
„ Galfry, 10 H. 6, 508

Hy.(48H.ni.)232;

Sibel, his wife, id. ; (50 H.

III.) 234; (25 E. I.) 254;

(26 E. I.) 255; (30 E. I.)

259;(3oE. I.)472;(34E. I.)

262 ; grandson of Henry (20

E. III.) 488; (19 E. I.) 251 ;

(6 H. VI.) 488 ; (10 H. VI.)

498, 502-9

Kniveton, Hy. fil Mathew, 5 E.
I, 240
Johanna, his wife „
Kniveton, Hugo, 6 J., 162
„ John, 6 H. 6, 490

„ Johanna, wo. of John,

13 H. 4. 484
Kniveton, Math. (44 H. III.)
227; (I E. I.) 237; (4E. I.)

239
Kniveton, Rich., 27 H. 3, 442

„ Roger, 15 H. 2, III

Thomas (6 H. VI.)

492 ; (10 H. VI.) 509

Kniveton, Walter, 5 E. i, 240

Knotting, Henry, i E. I, 238

Roger, 9 H. 3, 193

Kokefield, Adam (5 J.) 159 ; (8

J.) 171
Kylebum, Rad fil Rad, 50 H.

3» 233
Kynnersley, Thos., 6 H. 6,

493
Kynthorpe, Galf, 392

L'abbe, Rich., 173
LAbricotes, Hugh, 2 J., 148
„ Wm. fil Walter, 3

J-» '52
Labecot, Ralf fil Walter, 5 J.,

157
Lacel, Wm. (10 R. I.) 145 ; (i

J.) 146
Lacy, Ilbert de, 31 H. I, 97

,, Reginald, 21 E. 3, 480
Lade, Roger, 34 H. 3, 219

,, John, id.
Ladelow, Thos., 11 E. 2, 455
Lagenham, Galf, 1 1 E. 2, 454
Lambok, Rich., 31 E. I, 260

Robert fil Walter, 2

Lamcote, Hugh, I J., 146

fil

J-. 149
Lameley, Henry, 24 H. 3, 209

Robert, his son, id,, bis

Lameley, Roger, 6 £. 2, 468

„ Henry fil Cecil, 38 H.

3,222
Lameley, Rich, fil Robert, 40

H. 3, 224
Lameley, Robt. fil Ily., 38 H.

3,222

Eleanor, widow of Henry, id.
Lameley, Hamel de, id.
LANCASTER, DUKE OF, 21

E. I, 481
LANCASTER, THOS., EARL

OF (30 E. L) 469 ; (4 E. IL)

465
LANCASTER, HY., EARL

OF, 20 E. 3, 474
Lancaster, Robt., 10 H. 3, 194
Lanceline, Alan fil Wm., 6 E. 2,

313

Lancelin, Robert fil Robert, 313
,, Wm.,Walesby, 313, 347

Landa, Prior of, 27 H. 3, 432
„ Jacob, 34 H. 3, 218
,, Simon de la, 32 H. 2,

133
Landa, Wm., 30 H. 3, 215
Landries, Jordan (Certif.) 308
Lane, Rich, in the, 4 E. i, 239
Lanfrecomb, Rich, 41 H. 3, 226
Langar, Wm. fil Rich, 4 H. 3,

187
Langdon, Ketel, 2 J., 149
„ Osbert, 2 J., 149
„ John, 2 J., 149
„ Langdon, Matt., 1 3 H.

3, 196
Langle, Agnes, 5 H. 3, 187
Langel, Walter fil Galf, 4 E. i,

239
Langelont, Simon, 34 E. i, 262

LANGFORD AND LONG-

FORD—
Langford, Agnes, 30 E. i, 470-7
„ John (43 H. III.) 227;

(30 E. L) 4705
Langford, Margaret widow of

Nicholas (20 E. III.) 486 ; (10

H. VI.) 496-500-4
Langford, Nic (44 H. III.) 229 ;

(20 E. in.) 475-7; (13 H.

IV.) 483.4; (6H.VL)49o
Langford, Nigel (27 H. III.)

442; (44 H. in.) 230; (13

£. L)246
Langford, Oliver (13 E, I.) 245 ;

(15 E. L)247
Langford, Oliver fil Nigel, 4 £.

1,239
Langford, Ralf, 10 H. 6, 502-10
„ Roger fil Wm., 55 H.

3,237
Langford, Wm. (40 H. III.)

224; (53 H. in.) 235; (13

£. I.) 246
Johanna, his wife, id.
Langford, Wm. fil Mich., 44 H.

3,229
Langleye, Beatrice, widow of

Robt., of Wapenbroc, 44 H.

3,229
Langethwaite, Robt., Tulcholm,

14 H. 3, 201
Langetoft, Ad., 5 H. 3, 188

„ Cecile, 8 H. 3, 191
Langetot, Milo, 22 H. 2, 1 19
Langeton, Galf (27 H. III.) 429;

(34 H. III.) 218 ^M
Langeton, John (23 £. I.) 252 ;

(6E. II.) 468
Langeton, John fil Galf, 40 H.

3,225
Langeton, Oliver, 20 E. I, 251
„ Wm., 40 H. 3, 224
Langwath, Wm., 11 £.2, 452-4

544

Lanutn,Roger(4j-)i54; ("9^)
388; (6 J.) 163; (12 J.) 177;

(13 J-) 178; (14 J.) 399; (2
H. III.) 393; (5 ". HI.)
188 ; (27 H. III.) 432; Tilncy
(3 H. III.) 183
Lanum, Thos., (2 H. III.) 393 ;
(5H. III.) 188; (27 H. Ill-)
432; (32 H. 111.) 216; (10
E. I.)243; (II E. II.) 451
Lanum, William, 14 J., 397
Lapareillier, Galf, 9 J., 173
Lascy, Kdmund, 40 H. 3, 225
I^steles, Rich., 43 H. 3, 227
I^tcombc, John, ii E. 2, 453
Lathe, Gilliert de la, 1 E. I,

237
Lathbury, Alured, 6 H. 6, 486

„ Alfred, 13 H. 4, 484

„ Alveredus, 6 H. 6,

491
Lathbury, John, 10 H. 6, 504-6

„ Rob, 6 H. 6, 493

Lathum, Jo., 21 H. 3, 424

Latham, Robt.,333; (21 H.III.)

417; (26 H. III.) 211 ; (27

H. in.) 438-41 ;(28H. III.)

213; (32 H. IIL) 216; (40

H. III.) 224; (44 H. III.)

229; (50 H. III.) 234

Johanna, ux ej., 26 II. 3,

211

Latham, Thos., 14 E. I, 246

„ Roger fil Thos., 34 E.

I, 262

Latimer, Thos., 34 £. I, 262

Lora, his wife, ,,

Lavered, Ralf, 9 J., 174

,, Rich, 17 J., 182

„ Wm. fil Ralf, Sibtorp,

3 H. 3, 184
Laveroc, Isabella, 10 H. 6,

503
Laveroc, Richard, Bailiflf of

Derb, 29 £. i, 258
Lawton, Thos., 11 £. 2, 452
Lecton (North) Simon fil Alex.,

30 H. 3, 220
Lcctris (see Lettris)
Ledmer, 41, 50
I^dric, John, 46 H. 3, 231
Ledner, Jo., 10 H. 6, 500
Leech = Leche
Leech (see Leke) Henry (17 IT,

II.) 113; (18 H. IL) 113;

(26 H. IL) 116
Leech, John, 6 J., 165
Leech, John fil Ralf, 320, 152;

under-sheriff (6 J.) 161
Leech, John fil Wm. (3 H. III.)

184; (6 if. VI.) 486; (25 H.

IL) 123; (28 H. IL) 128;

(32 H. Ill ) 133
Leech, Kad, 10 li. 6, 499-502-9
Roger, 13 H. 4, 484

INDIiX OF PERSONS.

«»

Leech, Wm. (31 H. I.) 131 ; (il
J.) 175; (12 J.) 176; (3 H.
IIL) 184
Lefremunt, Galf (Certif.) 337
Leflhand, Robt., 5 J., 157

le(;a, legh, lee, leges

Lega, H. fil Robt., H. 2, 289
,, James, 10 II. 6, 500
,, Isabella, wo. John, 21 E.
3.480

Lega, Peter de, 12 H. 2, 108

Legh, Peter (35 H. IIL) 220 ;
(23 E. 1.) 252

Leges, Peter, 4 J., 154
„ Robert, 6 H. 6, 490
„ Wm. (21 H. IIL) 418;
fil Hy. (21 E. L)25i

Legerton (see Leirton)

LEICESTER, THE EARL
OF (8 H. IL) 106; (21 H.
IIL) 419; (27 H. III.) 461

Leicester, Hugh (2 H. II.) I17;
(28 H. II.) 128 bis; (29 H.
II.) 129

Leicester, Josce, 20 H. 3, 207
,, Rich (Gameligeye) 34

H. 3, 217

Leirton (see Legerlon and Lev-
er ton)

Leirton, Clement fil Wm., 44

H. 3, 2'9
Leirton, Jordan (41 H. III.)

226; (43 H. III.) 227
Leirton, Malger fil Fulc, 25 E.

1.254
Leirton, Nigel (5 J.) 58; (13 J.)

^79

Cicely, his wife id,

,, Simon fil Wm., 25 E.

1. 254

LEKE, LEYKE, LEIK,

LEK—
Leke, Alan fitz Harald, 23 H.

2, 122, 129

Leke, Alan nepos. Elfnot, 285
„ Elfnot, 285
„ Harald de (c. H. IL)
289; (15 H. IL) III

Leke, John le Coroner, 53 H.

3.235
Leke, John (7 H. III.) 189;

(16 H. III.) 203; (21 H.

IIL) 413; (27 H. IIL) 427;
(34 H. III.) 218; (55 H.
III.) 237; (13 H. IV.) 484;
(10 H. VI.) 496
Leik, Mich., 13 E. I, 246
Leke, Nic. fil Robt., 46 H. 3,

231
Leke, Rad, 10 H. 6, 509

Samps de, 14 H. 3, 201
Thos., 46 H. 3, 231
Wm., 13 J., 178
Leraan, Rico, 34 H. 3. 218
Lenedale, Rich, 53 H. 3, 235

It

..

.»

Lenn, Philip, Chesterfield, 29

E. I, 258
Lenoreis, Alan, i E. I, 237
Lenton, Prior (21 H. III.)

420-2 ; (27 H. III.) 429-34 ;

(34 H. HI.) 218; (30 E. I.)

472; (II E. IL) 456; (20

E. III.) 477
Lenton, Jacob fil Jacob, 32 H.

3, 216
Lenton, Roger, Prior of, 44 IL

3. 229
Leowin, Chidde (D.) 324
LEONIBUS, PETER, 4 J,

373, 387
Lepers, House of, Derby, 1 1 E.

2,456

Leper, Adam, 10 H. 6, 508

Lepsi, 42 bis

Lere, Osbert 31 H. I, 98

Lessington = Lexington —

Lessington, John (28 H. IIL)

213; (34 H. III.) 218; (41

H. IIL) 226; (12 E. L)245

Lessington, heirs of Jo., 48 H.

3. 232
Lessington, Peter, 44 H. 3, 229
„ Rich. (6 J.) 161 ; (7

J.-)i67^iV; (8 J.) 171; (9 J.)

174
Lessington, Rol>ert (8 J.) 171 ;

(17 J.) 182; (8H. HL) 192;

(13 H. IIL) 196; (20 H.III.)

207 bisi (21 H. IIL) 419;

(37 H. IIL) 221, 316; (38

H. IIL) 332; (6E. IL)3I3
Lessington, Robert (sheriff) 40

H. 3, 224
Lester, Hugo, Retford, 27 £.

'.255
I^tilia (Ratcliff) 34 H. 3, 218
Lettlcr, Walter, 27 H. 3, 212
Lettris, Colwyn, 2 H. 3, 407
„ Nic, 386; (8 H. IIL)

192; (13 H. IIL) 199; (14

H. IIL) 200; (16 H. IIL)

203; (21 H. IIL) 412; (30

H. IIL) 215
Lettris, Peter, 2 H. 3, 407

„ Ric, 8 H. 3, 190
Leuric, Abbot, 34

„ (see Eluric), 37, 39, 49,

51 bis, 52, 57 (4), 58, 59 bis,

64,68
Levened, 23 H. 2, 122
Levenot, 31 bis; 40 bis ; 41,

44 bis ; 51, 55, 56 (4), 57 (3),

58 (5), 59 (3), 67
Levenot, Sierre, 46

Lcverhard, Henry, 3 H. 3, 184

Robert, his brother

Leverik, £lia.s, 44 H. 3, 229

Leveric, Elias, 14 E. I, 246

Leveneth, Westhalum, 15 H. 3,

201

INDEX OF PERSONS.

545

Levesham, Jo., 8 J., 172
Levesk, Regl., 44 H. 3, 230
Leirton, Alice fil Kobt., 34 H.

2,235

Leverton, Grun, 20 H. 2, 116,

"7
Leverlon, Henry, i E. i, 238

,, Jord. fil Wm., 44 H.

3, 229
Lerewigg, John, 55 H. 3, 237
Levinc, 26, 31, 57
Levine, Hugh, 15 H. 2, ill
Leving, 36, 50. 52
I^vingus, 4 1., 154
LEWIN, LEOWIN, LEUUIN
Lewin, 26, 31, 42, 46, 53 bis,

64 bis, 65, 67
Leuin, Cilt, 40, 63
Leowin, Chidde, 31 H. I, 96
Leuuin fil Aluuin, 69
Lexington, see Lessington
Leye, Regin, 32 H. 3, 216

„ Wra., 349-51
Leys, Thos,, I E. i, 237

„ Wm., 21 H. 3, 415
Lichfield, Hy. (6 J.) 163 ; (8 J.)

171
LJgulf, 31. 32, 37, 4S» 63
Lilleford, Laurence (30 E. L)

472 ; (20 E. HL) 477
Lillock, Galf, 1 1 E. 2, 452
Limmestre, Thos. fil John, 29

E. I, 259
Lymester, Thomas, 10 H. 6,

509
LINCOLN, EARL OF, 18 E.

1,250
LINCOLN, BARONY, 440-1
LINCOLN, THE BISHOP

OF (31 H. I.) 98; THE

BARONY, 442 ; (6 J.) 165 ;

(3H. IIL)i84; (21 H. III.)

413-7; (27 H. in.) 434;

Robt. (27 H. IH.) 444;
Henry (41 H. IIL) 226; (8
E. I.) 242
LINCOLN, DEAN OF (22
H. IIL) 460; (II E. IL)

456
Lincoln, Norman, 68

Rad de, 31 H. 2, 131

Thomas, 27 H. 3, 436

Wm. (Ccrtif.)3i6

Lindibi, Stephen, 41 H. 3, 226
Clarice, his wife, id,

Lindes, Roger, (38 H. III.) 221 ;
(39 H. III.) 223

Lindsey, Wm., 5 H. 3, 187

Lintorp, Nic, 46 H. 3, 231

Liulfot, Hugo, 8 J., 171

LISIARD, THE CANON. 3

J-. 154
LISLE, DE, FAMILY, (Grace

Dieu), 346

Lisurs = Lusors —

39

ft

Lisures, Andrew, 2 J., 148

Lusoris, Falk, 63

Lysurs, Nigel (27 H. III.) 442 ;

(30 H. IIL) 215
Lisurs, Ralf, Fled borough (21

E. L) 252 ; (II E. II.) 452
Luzors, Robert (31 H. I.) 97;

(II J.) 175* («3J-) 178; {16

J.) 181; (3 H. III.) 185; (6

H. III.) 189
Littlebur, John, 33 H. 3, 217

Margaret, his wife
Littlewell, Hugh, 391
I^ochel^h, Alice, 9 H. 3, 193
Loftsco, Rich., 9 H. 3, 193
Lokington, Thos., 50 H. 3, 233
London, Thos. (18 H. II.) 114

bis ; (23 H. IL) 121 ; (36

H. in.) 220
London, Wm. (10 R. I) 145 ;

(3 J.) 154; (5 J.) 160; (7 J.)
280; (32 H. IIL) 216
London, Wm., c. H. 2, 277
Longford (see Langford)
Longsdon, Rich., 10 H. 6, 502
Longvillers, Alesca wo. John, 33

E. I, 261
Longvillers, Clement (5 E. I.)

240; (II £. II.) 452
Longvillers, Eleanor, wo. of

John, 21 £. I, 252
Longvillers, John, 14 H. 3, 201
,, widou of William,
II £.2, 452
Lorimer, Alan, 27 H. 3, 428
LOVEL, LUVEL—
Luvel, Galf, i J., 147

„ Magr. Hy. (43 H. III.)
228; (48 H. in.) 232
Lovel, Henry fil (Edensor) 7 J.,

169
Lovel, Hugo, 28 H. 3, 212
Philip, 43 H. 3, 228
John fil John, id, 229
Robt., 3 H. 3. 185
„ Wm. (48 H. in.) 233;

(II E. II.) 453
Lovered, Walter fil Hugo, 4 E.

i»239
LOVETOT, LUVITOT,
Lovetot, Emma (22 H. II.) 119 ;
(23H.II.)i2i;(27H. II.)I27
Luvetot, Hy., 7 J., 168
„ Hugo, 31 H. I, 98
,, Johanna, sister of John
fil Oliver, 30 E. i, 259

Alesia, sister of John fil

Oliver, 259

Luvttot, John (40 H. III.) 224-

5; (43 H. IIL) 228; (7E.L)

241

Luvetot, Maiilde(8H. III.) 190;

(14 H. III.) 199; (18H. in.)

205; (21 H. III.) 419-21;

(27 H. in.) 432-43

»»
11

Luvetot, Maurice, nepos. of

Robt., c. H. 2, 289
Lovetot, Nigel, 390 ; (3 J.) 153 5

(5j-)i6o; (3 H. in.) 183;

(14 H. in.) 199; (21H. in.)

418-21
Luvetot, Rad (2 J.) 148 ; (5 J.)

157
Luvetot, Rich (2 H. II.) lOi ;

(8 J.) 171

Luvitot, Robt. (Certif.) 289;
(27 H. in.) 438; (44 H.
in.) 229

Luvetot, Roger (27 H. III.)
4?7; (39 H. Ill) 223; (40
H in.) 225; (43 H. IIL)
227; (44 H. III.) 229 bis\
50 H. III.) 234

Luvetot, Thom, 6 E. I, 240

Wm. (31 H. L)96-8;
(22 H. II.) 119; (27 H. n.)
127, 130; (4 J.) 154; (6 J.)
167

Lou, Rich, Morley, i E. i, 238

Lowe, Alex, 349-51 (see Lowed)

Lowenthorpe, Wm., 10 H. 6,
506

Lowes, Robert, 10 H. 6, 507

Luci, Go<lfr, 134
,, Ralf fil, II E. 2, 452
,, Reginald (14 11. II.) 109,
no, 328; (17 H. II.) 113;
19 H. II.) 1 15-6

Luci, Wm., 24 H. 3, 210

Ludham = Lowdham

Loudham, Dna, 9 J., 1 73
„ Galf, II E. 2, 453
„ Eustace (14 J.) 403 ;
(16 J.) 150; (19H. III.)2o6-
7; (25 H. IIL) 211

Ludenham, John, Clarebro, 1 1
E. 2, 452

Ludham, Walter (40 H. III.)
225; (lE. L)238;(3iE. L)
260

Isabella, his wife, id,

Ludham, Walter fil Walter, 4
E. I, 239

Lud worth, Uctred, 31 H. 2,

131

Lumene, Wm., 3 J., 152

Lumley, Marmaduke, 10 H. 6,

5<H
Lund, Robt., 12 H. 2, 108

„ Wm., 391-2

Lung, Robt., Truscolt, 11 E. 2,

452
Lungesden, Rich, ii E. 2, 452

Lune, Ralf fil, 22 H. 2, 121

Lupars, Bald, 3 IL 2, 103-4-7

„ Rich, 3 H. £, 103-4

,, Wm., 25 H. 2, 124

Lupus, John, I H. 2, 99

Lupo, Robert (14 J.) 179; (16

I.) 180

546

f INDEX OF PERSONS.

Lnstrehal. Alexr., 12 H. 3, 197
Lutchurch, the men of, 27 H. 3,

447
I.uttrel, Andrew (l J.) 147; (2

T.) 148; (21 H. III.) 417;

(27 H. III.) 439; (43 H. III.)

227 ; (44 H. III.) 220
Luttrel, Galf, 14 H. 3, 199
„ Robt,, 21 H. 3, 414
Lutrington, Rich, 2 J., 148
Luys, John, 6 H. 6, 493
Lymesy, Nich, 391

„ Ralf, 12 H. 3, 197
Lymester (see Limestre)
Lymystre, Thos., 10 H. 6, 505-

9-11
Lymystre, Wm., 10 H. 6, 503
Lyan, PhiUp, 14 J., 180
Lynacre, John, Mosbro, 10 H. 6

496
Lyndraper, Wm., 27 E. I, 255
John, his son * „

Reginald, his son „
Lynford, Thos., 13 H. 4, 484
Lysons, 86, 89
Lyster, Wm., 10 H. 6, 503
Lytton, Rich, 10 H. 6, 502

„ Robt., Chev., 13 H. 4,

484
Makefield, Avice, widow of

Hy., 7 E. I, 241
Makefield, John, 43 H. 3, 228
,, Roger, 14 H. 2, no

,, Thos. (27 E. I.) 255 ;

(28 E. I.) 255 ; (33 E. I.) 261
Mackworth, Edith dl Emma, I

E. I, 238
Mackworth, Henry (38 II. III.)

222; (15 E. I.) 247; (10 H.

VI.) 506-8
Mackworth, John, 10 H. 6, 502
Thos. (c. H. VI.)

490; (10 H. VI.) 503-8-10
MACLEAN, SIR JOHN, 304
Macurneys, John (28 E. I.) 257 ;

(29 E. I.) 258
Macun, Wm. le, Derby, 5 H.

3» 188
Madox, 265-7

Madwell, Rich., 35 H. 3, 220

Maggc, Adam fil, 5 H. 3, 187

de Mapelton
Magnaville, Cieofry fil Robert, fV/.
Roger (Goelso) 298
Stephen, his son, id.
Roger, brother of

Rnger, id,
Magnaville,Robert,and Goisfred,

his son, id.
Magnaville, Wm., id.
Maillard, John (16 J.) 181 ; (3

H. in.) 185
Maillard, Thos., 31 E. I, 260
Maisse, Elie, 27 H. 2, 127
Majorc, Rich., 21 E. 3, 479

91

>t

»>

Makeley, Jo., 10 H. 6, 502
Makeney, Ranulf, Bailiff of

Derby, 13 E. I, 246
Makerel, Hugo, 20 E. 3, 475 80
Ralf (13 H. IV.) 183;

(6H. VL)486; (10 IL VL)

500-6
Makerel, Wm., 22 H. 3, 469
Makeham, Wm., 38 H. 3, 222
Malbisse, Rich. (5 J.) 160 ; (7

J.) 170
Malbisse, Robert, 23 H. 2, 123
„ Wm. (34H.n.) 135;

(27 H. HL) 437
Maid, Wm., 26 H. 2, 125
Maldeley, Thos., 10 H. 6, 501
Malekake, Galf, 392

„ John, 20 H. 2, 116
„ Roger, 2 J., 374, 386-

7-391 h's
Malekake, Wm., 392
Malger, 61 dis.
Malet, Alan (8 H. IIL) 190;

(10 H. III.) 195; (2iH.in.)

420; (27 H. IIL) 447
Malet, Thos. fil Thos., 18 H. 3,

232
Malet, Walter (c. R. T.) 386 ; (5

J.) 161 ; (6 J.) 163 ; (3 H.

III.) 184; (9 H. IIL) 193

dis
Malet, Wm. (2 J.) 151 ; (10 H.

in.) 195

Mallai, Peter, 6 J., 162
Malere, Hugo, 9 H. 3, 193
Malore, Robert, 24 H. 3, 209
Malvore, Peter, 39 H. 3, 223

,, Tom, td,
Malesours, John, 13 J., 178
„ John fil Wm., 13 J.,
179 6is
Malesoars, Robt. (44 H. IIL)
229 ; (48 H. III.) 233
Amice, his wife
Malesours, Wm., 7 J., 169

,, Juetta fil Alice, id.

Malune, Alexr., ii J., 175
Maneby, Roger, 44 H. 3, 230
Mandebi, Wm., 28 H. 2, 129
Manderill, Wm., Bekerton, 26

E. I. 255
Manleye, Gal., 18 E. I, 250
MANUVEL, MALUVEL,

MALOVEL—
Manluvel, Joha., wo. of Robt.,

22 H. 3, 209
Manluvel, Peter, 40 H. 3, 225
„ Ralf, 6 J., 163

Robt., 148, 391 ; (2
.) 15'; (6 J.) 163 (Gundred,
is wife) ; Rampton (6 H.
HL) 188.9; (9H. IIL) 193;
(12 H. III.) 197 ; heirs of (6
J.) 166; Tickhill (4 J.) 155;
Roclaveston (9 H. III.) 193

i-i

Manluvel, Rog., 6 R. i, 136
„ Stephen (21 H. IIL)

419-21 ; (27 H. IIL) 436 ;

(40 H. IIL) 224; (I E. L)

237 ; (5 E. 1.) 240
Maloverer, Stephen, 33 IL 3,

207
Manluvel, Wm., 50 H. 3, 233
Malvesinus (see Hercey)
Mansel, 27 H. 2, 121
Mansfield, Hugh, 12 J., 176

Ralf(33H.IL)i34;

(10 E. 1.) 243
Manschalt, Rad, 6 J., 167
Mantle, Richard, 18 IL 2, 114

dis
MANVERS, MALUVERS,

MANNERS, MANUVERS
Manvers, Julia, mother of Leo-

nius, 21 H. 3, 412
Manvers, Leon (14 H. III.) 199 ;

(18 H. IIL) 205 ; (21 H. IIL)

419-22 ; (32 H. IIL) 208
Maluvers, Michael (1198) 389;

(4 J.) 155; (6 J.) 163; (16
J.) 180; (2 IL IIL) 408; (27
H. HI.) 439
Manville = Mandeville
Mandeville, Gauf, 2 H. 3, 407
Wm. (3 H. III.)
183 ; (6 H. IIL) 191
Manville, German, brother of

Ran, H. 2, 289
Man way, Adam, 14 H. 3, 199
Mapple, Eudo, 53 H. 3, 235
Mapelbec, Rad de, 12 H. 2, fo8
„ Roger, 12 H. 2, 108
Mapley, Amice, 43 H. 3, 227
Eudo, 46 H. 3, 231
Roger, 5 H. 3, 187
Tom, 40 H. 3, 231
Ivo, 43 H. 3, 227
Mapelton, Galf, 26 H. 3, 212
,, Henry, id.; (36 H.

IIL) 220; (37 H. IIL) 221;
(53 H. IIL) 235
Mapelton, Henry fil Rich, 33

E. I, 261
Mapelton, Robt. (12 E. I.) 245 ;

(II E. II.) 452
Mapelton, Swein, 15 H. 2, in

„ Thos., 4 E. I, 238
Mara, Oliver (Certif.) 321
Falcon, 18 H. 3, 205
Jacob, 4 J., 156
Wm., 13 J., 178
Marc, Ann, wo. of Philip, 18

H. 3, 205 «
Marc, Philip (sheriff) (ii J.)
174; (2 H. III.) 395-6,407;
(3H. IIL) 184,386; (4 H.
IIL) 185-7; (12 H. III.) 411;
(21 H. III.) 413; heirs of (27
H. IIL) 443; (6 H. VL)
490

I,

,,

INDEX OF PERSONS.

547

»t

M

Marc, Peter (undcr-sheriflf) (12
J.) 176; (12 H. III.) 197;
(19 H. III.) 206

Marc, Reg. (10 H. III.) 195;

(21 H. III.) 413
Marc, Simon fil Walter, 34 H.

3, 219
Marck, Elias, 11 J., 175

„ Robt., 22 H. 3, 209
Marcham, Cecil fil Robt., 17 E.

1, 249

Agnes, „

Marcham, Fulc, 22 H. 2, 121

Hy.(i6H.III.)203;
(21 E. III.) 480
Marcham, John fil Robert, 34

£. I, 262
Marcham, Rich., 27 H. 3, 438
Robt., 18 E. 1, 250
Robert, pson. of, ill
Wm., 391
Marchant, Alexr., 28 H. 3, 213
Marchroent, Alan, 43 H. 3, 227
Margaret, of Nottm., 27 II. 2,

127
Marjori (see Majori)
Mares, Prior, 9 E. I, 242
Maria, Adam, 1 1 J., 175
Marianus, Scotus, 4, 5
Marie, 29 H. 2, 129
Maris, Alexr., 5 E. J, 240
MARESCE, MARISCO,

MARESIE, MARSEYE—
Maresce, David, 8 H. 2, 106

Prior of, 27 H. 3, 431
Hugh, 8 H. 2, 106
Mareste, Isabella wo. Rann, 9

J., 174
Maresie, John de, 94, 31 II. I

Peter, 48 H. 3, 232
Rann (1198) 388; (i
J.) 147; (6 J.) 16s; (8 J.)
172; (12 J.) 177
Mariesie, Rann, heirs of, 2 H.

3.409
Marisco, Roger (18 H. III.)

205^(55H. 111)237

Maresia, Roger fil Wm., 22 H.

2, 120

Mareseye, Thos. (27 H. III.)
439 ; (43 H. III.) 227 ; fil
Roger (27 H. III.) 431

Marisco, Walter (2 H. III.)
394; (27 H. III.) 426; (34
H. III.) 219

Maresce, Wm. (26 II. II.) 125 ;
(12 J.) 176

Maresce, Wm. fil Wm, i E. i,

238
Maresie, William, Wodburg, 13

E. I, 246
Marescal, Andrew, 17 H. 3,

204
Marescal, John, Ekington, 10

H. 6, 496

»>

)*

»9

It

I)
tt
»»

Marescal, Stephen (27 11. III.)

429; (34 H. III.) 218; (46

H. III.) 231-3
Mariscal, Walter (55 H. III.)

236; (4 E.I.) 238
Marescal, Wm. (ii J.) 175 ; (2

H. III.) 405 ; (21 H. III.)

417
Marmion, heirs of Galf (Certif.)

291

Marmion, John, 34 H. 3, 217

„ Robt., 300, 330
Marnham, Nicholas, 31 H. 3,

228
Marnham, Robt., 16 H. 2, 112
Masci, Hamon (23 H. II.) 121 ;

32 H. II.) 133; {33 H. II.

134; (2 J.) 15'
Mascio, Rich, 23 H. 2, 121

Martel, Galf, 46 H. 3, 231

„ Martir, Canwic, 329

„ Rich (21 H. III. 413 ;

( 16 E. I.) 240 ; (30 E. I.) 470 ;

(20 E. III.) 347

Marteinni, Elia (5 H. III.) 187 ;

(8 H. III.) 190

Martin, Elias, 4 H. 3, 186

Nich, 10 II. 6, 501

Rad, II E. 2, 453

Wm. fil Hugh, 16 E. I,

248-9

Martinwast, Rich (Cerlif.) 314

„ Robt., c. H. I, 314

Marys, Robt., 27 H. 3, 434

Massey, Roger, 10 H. 6, 502

Matherfield, Hervy, 37 H. 3,

221

MATHEW, THE EARI., 14

Jy 399
Mathew, of Nottingham, 27 H.

2, 127

Matesdon, Nic, 6 H. 6, 486

Matloc, Rad 6 J., 163

Mattson, Hy., il E. 2, 454

Maty, Henry, 34 E. i, 262

Mauhaut, Senescal, Tickell, 21

H. 3, 418
Maulere, Robert (Canon of Suel)

35 H. 3, 220
Maunsel, Felicia wo. of John, 48

H. 3, 232
Maurice (clic) c. H. 2, 289
„ Peter fil, li J., 175
May lard, Wm., 21 H. 3, 420
Mayn, John, 15
Maysham, Thos., 6 II. 6. 485
Mayton, Robt., 8 R. I, 367
Mealton, Galf, 13 J., 179
Med, Walter, c. H. 2, 276
Medicus, Ralf, 7 H. 2, 105
„ Hy., 12 H. 2, 108
Medwe, John, brother of Thos.,

1 1 E. 2, 454
Mere, Jacde la, 5 J., 159
Meres, Rann, 4 J., 1$$ 6hs

Mering, Gerard, 6 H. 3, 1 88
Meering, Robt., 8 E. i, 242

Gilbert (39 H. III.)

223 ; (40 H. III.) 224
Juetta, his wife
Mering, Robt., 13 E. i, 246
Meinton, Roger, 53 H. 3, 235
Melburn, Peter, 13 H. 4, 484
„ Robt. (43 H. III.) 227;

(44 H. III.) 229; (8 E. I.)

242
Melburn, Wm., 13 E. i, 246
Melloc, Roger, 55 H. 3, 236 dts
Melner, Roger fil Robert, 26

E. I, 254
Melner, Roger, jun., Tadington,

28 E. I, 258
Melot, Wm., Carlton, 38 H. 3,

222
Melton, Milo, 6 E« i, 240
Melun, Robt., 11 £.2, 453

„ Rog., 1 1 E. 2, 454
Mendre, Kegl. (13 H. III.) 199 ;

(14 H. III.) 200; (IS H. III.)

202; (18 H. III.) 205; (21

H. III.) 419; (25 H. III.)

210 ; (26 H. in.) 212; (27

H. III.) 212; (30 H. III.)

215

Isolde, his wife, iJ.
Mendham, John (21 H. III.)

415 ; (27 E. I.) 256
Menilla, Alex., 391
Mentone, Prior, 392

„ Rich., 38 H. 3, 221

Mercator, Robt. de Wymund-

ham, 15 H. 2, III
Merce, Walter, 2 J., 148
Mercer, Robt., 12 J., 177
Mercheriston, Wm., 5 J., 157
Mere, John, Tideswell, 10 H. 6,

501
Merecalf, Robt., 27 H. 3, 440
MEREDUCK, GRIFFIN AP,

27 E. I (see Wenhuwyn) 256
Robt., his man „

Mere vale, Abbot, 6 H. 6, 493
Mers, Ada, Cogwell, 43 II. 3,

227
M'cinton, Rog., 44 H. 3, 229
Mersington, Wm. fil Hy., 55

H. 3, 237
Mersington, Agatha, 55 H. 3,

237
Merston, Gilbert, 16 H. 3, 197
Mervil, Cecil, 26 H. 3, 212
Meschines, Cicely fil Wm., 334
Messam, Wm., 26 H. 3, 220
Messer, W^m., 31 H. 2, 131
Messenger, Adam, 43 H. 3, 227
Melham, John (30 E. I.) 470;

fil John (20 E. III.) 477
Metham, bibilla, 4 £. 2, 464
Meveril, John, 10 H. 6, 508
Nich, 27 H. 3, 444

i>

548

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Mcveril, Samps, lo II. 6, 501
„ Stephen (8 II. III.) 190;

(9 H. III.) 193
Meysham, Hugo, 37 H. 3, 221
Wm. fil Wm., 50 H.

3.234
Meysham, Wm. (35 H. III.)

219; (36 H. III.) 220; (41

H. III.) 226; (44 H. III.)

230; (53 H. III.) 235
MAISNILLE, MEISNIL,

MENNEL, MEYNIL, MEI-

NEL—
Maisnille, Cecilia (21 H. III.)

416-23 ; (27 H. III.) 446
Maisnille, Gerard, 10 H. 6,

507-11
Maisnille, Gilbert de, 31 H. I,

98,351
Meynil, Giles (22 H. III.) 461 ;

and Marg. (32 H. III.) 216 ;

(13 E. I.) 215; (20 E. III.)

476-86; (6 H. VI.) 493
Meynil, Hugo (31 H. III.) 288 ;

(10 H. VI.) 500
Meynil, Hugh, 32 H. 2, 309

Philippa Salvage, his wife
Meynil, Hugh fil Hugh, 13 E. i,

246
Meynil, John, 9 E. I, 242
„ Isabella, 12 H. 3, 195

,, Lucie, 28 and 29 £.1,

257
Meynil, Nich, 18 E. I, 250
„ Robt. (Certif.) 351 ; (22

H. II.) 119; (33 H, II.) 134;
(R. I.) 339 ; Isabella, his
daughter, iV/. ; (14 H. III.)
201 ; (22 H. III.) 461
Meynil, Kobt. fil Robt., 352
,, Roger fil Henry, 16 H.

3»203
Meynil, Stephen, 17 H. 3, 204

,, Walter, 10 H. 6, 500

„ Wm. (23 H. II.) 123;

(6 H. III.) 194 ; (22 H. III.)

4601; (5E. I.) 240; (25 E.

I.) 254
Meynil, Wm. fil Philip (12 E. I.)

245 ; (28 E. I.) 257
Meynil, Wm. fil Wm., 16 E. I,

248

Pha, his mother „

Michael the Miller, ii E. 2, 454
Michel, Lucas, 8 J., 172
Michael, ol Swansey, 34 H. 3,

219
Middleton, John, 10 H. 6, 500
Rad (Certif.) 314
Rich.(32E. L)26i ;

(II E.H.) 453; fil Walter (53

H. in.) 235
Middleton, Robt., 2 J., 149
Miggeley (see Wiggeley)
Mile, Michael de, 4 E. i, 239

»i

t>

Milliers, Gilbt., 44 H. 3, 229
„ Hump., 44 H. 3, 229
Joha., his wife
Millers, Roger, 17 J., 182
Miller, Nich, II E. 2, 452

„ Robt., 10 H. 6, 502
Milner, Hy., 10 H. 6. 510
Milneton, Robt., 41 H. 3, 226
Milo (miller) 14 H. 3, 199
Milot, Roger, 4 E. i, 238
Millet, Roger (53 H. III.) 235;

(I E. L)238
Milton, John, 10 H. 6, 498
Mimekin, Philip (9 J.) 174; (12

J.) 176; (14 J.) 399; (3 H.

ill.) 183
Mimeton, Philip, 14 J., 179
MISTERTON, MISTON,

MUSTONA—
Misterton, Emewi, 31 H. i, 98
Hy., 13 J., 178
Ralf (2 J.) 148 ; (4

J.) 157; (5 J.) »6o
Misterton, Rad fil Andrew, 43

H. 3, 227
Misterton, Robert (43 H. III.)

227 ; (55 H. III.) 236
Misterton, Wm. fil Ralf, 351
„ Walter, 12 H. 2, 108
„ Wm., 13 E. I, 246
Mody, Rich., 32 H. 3, 216
MOELS NIC (Barony) 442;

(21 H. in.) 417; (26 H. III.)

211 ; (27 H. III.) 442
Moels, Gauf, 31 H. i, 98

„ Matilde, 21 H. 3, 421
Mohun, John fil Alice, 28 and

29 E. I, 257
Mokus, Nic, Newark, 55 H. 3,

237
Moine, Wm., Carlton, ii £.2,

454
Molbrai, Hugh, 6 J., 167

Nigel, 18 II. 3, 205

Robert, 22 H. 3, 119

Roger, (31 H. L) 98;

(21 H. in.) 417

Molbrai, Wm. (5 H. IL) 104 ;

(3J.)i54;(6J.)i6s;(7j.)i7o
Moldeson, John, 15

Molesfen, Thos. fil Stephen, 32

H. 3, 216
Molineton, Robt., 4 E. i, 238
Monachus = Musters
Moneleye, Rob., ii E. 2, 454
Moneyash, Henry, 10 H. 6, 502
Monetarius, Regl., 17 H. 2, 113

bis
Monjoie, Rad (25 E. I.) 254 ;

(30 E. L) 470-2 ; (20 E. III.)

475-87
Monjoie, Rob. (30 E. I.) 471-6 ;

(20 E. III.) 488

Monjoie, Serlo, 27 H. 3, 444-5

Montjoie, Wm., H. 2, 289

»>

99

11

Monjoie, The Lord, 6 H. 6, 492
Monte, Walter ad, 3 H. 3, 185
Montealto, Milicent, 28 E. I,

^57
Montealto, Oliver, 22 H. 3, 208

Ralf, 30 E. I, 472

Robt., 30 E. I, 470-6

Roger, 27 H. 3, 446

Montebegonis, Oliver, 348 ; (12

H. in.) 411; (14 H. in.) 200

bis; (18 H. in.) 122, 205

Montebegonis, Rc^er (5 J.) 160 ;

(9 J-) 173; (12 J.) 176; (2
H. III.) 405-6; (5 H. in.)
287; (8H. III.) 191-2

Monteburg, Rich., 16 E. I,
249

Montecalvino, John de, 31 H. i,

97
Montecute, Dna, 20 E. 3, 477

„ John (I J.) 146; (13

J.) 171 ; (16 J.) 181 ; (3 H.

in.) 185; (8 H. III.) 191;

(13 H. III.) 198; (14H. in.)

200; (16 H. in.) 202; (30

H. III.) 214 ^;j; (38 H. III.)
222; (43 H. in.) 228; (7E.
L) 241 ; (13 E. I.) 247
Montfort, Hugh, 270

„ heirs of Peter (27 E.

I.) 255 ; (34 E. I.) 262
MONTGOMERY, EARL

ROGER, 284
Montgomery, Dna Johanna, 6

H. 6, 490
Montgomery, John, H. 8, 284
Nich (13 H. IV.)

484; (6 H. VL) 486-9; (10

H. VL) 510
Montgomery, Peter, H. 2, 289
,, Ralf fil Walter,

H. 2, 289
Montgomery, Ralf (H. II.) 289 ;

(D.) id,
Montgomery, Roger, c. W. i, 296
Walter(ii38,285;

(1 175) w/.; 289 ; (Certif.) 283 ;

(15 H. IL)iii; (40 H. in.)

224 bis ; (50 H, III.) 233 ;

(13 E. I.) 24s; (3oE.L)472;

(20 E. in.) 475
Montgomery, Wm. (grandson

of Walter) 283-5 J (23 H. IL)

122 ; (7 J.) 169 ; (27 H. in.)

444; (44 H. III.) 229; (18

E. L)25o; (II E. II.) 452;

(10 H. VL) 510
Montgomery, Wm. fil Wm., 36

H. 3, 220
Moorwood, Rad (21 E. I.) 252 ;

(II E. IL)452
More = Mora (and see Maresco)
Mora, Fulc, 16 H. 3, 203

„ Robert (4 H. III.) 186;

(5 H. in.) 187

/-,

INDEX OF PERSONS.

549

More, Robert, Crumwell, 36 H.

3f 220
More, Wm., Staveley, 21 H. 3,

400
Morcar, 64

MORCAR, THE EARL, 87
Morcaidi, 33 H. i, 98
Morel, John, 6 H. 6, 490

,, Thos., 31 E. I, 260
Morhagb, Robt., 9 J., 173
Morhala, Robt., 15 H. 3, ill
Morin, Ralf (21 H. III.) 421 ;

(30 E. I.) 259
Isabella, his wife
Morin, Robert, 55 H. 3, 236
Moris, Rich., 6 H. 6, 493
Morisberg, Henry, 12 H. 3,

411
Morle, Godith, 13 H. 4, 484

„ Hugh, 14 H. 3, 201
Morley, Rad, 9 H. 3, 193

Walter, 349 (1247) 35 »
Morsnap, Hugo, Stretton, 33

£. I, 261
Morteshall, Robt. fil Alex., 2 J.,

149
Morteshall, Mathew hi Dna,

id,
Mortimer, Hugh, 3 H. 3, 405
„ Mathew, 28 E. 1,257
Ralf, 21 H. 3, 416

»»

„ Roger, 6 J., 165
MORTON, MORTEYNE,

MORETAIN—
MORTON, JOHN, EARL

OF, 32 H. 2, 132
Morton, Adam (22 H. II.) 119 ;

(25 H. IL) 124; (32 H. II.)

133; (33 H. II.) 134
Morton, Elias, 12 J., 177

Eustace, 335 (1 198) 389;

(I J.) 146 bis\ (2 J.) 149 ^/j;

(3 J-) «53; (4j-) 155-6 /^r.;

(5 J.) 159; (7j-)i7o; (8 J.)

172; (13 J) 178; (16 J.)

182; (4 H. III.) 187; (8H.

IIL) 191 ; (13 H. III.) 198 ;

(14H. IIL)200; (16 H. III.)

202; (20 H. III.) 207; (21

H. IIL) 418-20; (30 H. IIL)

214; (38 H. IIL) 222
Morton, Eustace fil Robt., 31

E. I, 266
Morton, Eust. fil Eust., 7 H. 3,

189-90
Morton, Galf (32 H. IL) 133;

(6 E. IL) 468
Morton, Hugh (39 H. III.) 223 ;

(10 H. VI.) 508

Lucas, 6 J., 164
Robt., Eustace fil, 33

E. I, 262
Morton, Roger (21 H. IIL) 415 ;

(30 E. L ) 469-70-7; (2 1 E. IIL)

474

»i

»i

Morton, Wm. (21 H. III.) 417-
27; (27 H. IIL) 447; (43
H. IIL) 228; (I E. L) 237;
(7E. L)24i; (15E. L)247

Motun, Alan, xo H. 6, 504
„ Dionis, widow of Robt.,
53 H. 3, 235

Moun, Henry Cowland, 1 1 E. 2,

452
Moun, Nich, 20 E. I, 257

„ Wm. (H. IL) 277 ; (46

H. IIL) 231
Moaners, John, 1 1 E. 2, 454
Mowbray (see Molbray)
MOWBRAY, HON. OF, 448 ;

.Wm., 2 H. 3, 405
Mowbray, Roger, 21 H. 3, 417
Moyne, t. le, 55 H. 3, 237
Muchesden, Nich, 13 H. 4, 484
MULES (SEE MOELS)
Mules, Matilde, 10 R. I, 145
Multon, Thomas, 2 H. 3, 410
Munby, Galf, 46 H. 3, 231
Mundeville, Nigel, 27 H. 3, 437
Murcaston, Jo., 20 H. 3, 475
Murci, Roger, Retford, 5 E. i,

240
Murdac, Florence fil Rich, 9 J.,

172
Murdac, Ralf, 362 ; sheriff (26

H. IL) 126; (6 R. L) 136
Muriel, Hugo fil Henry (18 E.

I.) 250 ; (20 E. I.) 251
Muriel, Roger, 2 H. 3, 4x0
MURRES, DUNCAN, EARL

OF, 334
Musard Barony, 321
Musard, Hasculf, 25, 60, 267 ;

(Certif.)32i ; (ii H. II.) 107;

(14 H. IL) X09; (21 H. IL)

117; (33 H. IL) 134; (55

H. IIL) 237
Musard, Hasculf, 31 H. 2, 132
, , Johanna, widow of Has-
culf, 32 H. 2, X33
Musard, John, c. 22 H. 3, 460
Margaret, 30 E. i, 470
Nic, 33 E. I, 26X-2
Margaret, his sister „
Musard, Ralf (31 H. IL) 132 ;

(1 198) 387; (I J.) 147; (13 J.)
178; (16 1.) X82; (3 H. IIL)

185; (8 H. IIL) 190-2; (10
H. IIL) 194; (13 H. IIL)
199; (X4 H. IIL) 200; (16
H. III.) 202; (30 H. III.)
214.5 ; (43 H. IIL) 228 ; (7

E. I.) 241 ; (15 E. I.) 247
Musard, Rich (Certif.) 320
„ Robert (20 H. III.)
207; (24 H. III.) 210; (27
H. IIL) 443
Muscamp, Adam, 14 J., 290
„ Gilbert, 34 H. 3, 218
Hugh, 43 H. 3, 227

)i

»»

Muscamp, Isabella, fil Robert,

348-55
Muscamp, Peter, 3 J., 153

„ Ralf, 44 H. 3, 229

„ Robert, 121 ; (i J.)

146; (61.) 163; (I4J.)396;

(i6J.) 180; (8H. III.) 190;

(27 H. III.) 430-4' ; (32 H.

III.) 218
Muscam, Robt. de South, 55 H.

3,237
Muscamp, Thomas (Certif.) 336 ;

(27 H. II.) 127; (12 J.) 177;

(13 J.) 178
Muscamp, Tom (14 J.) 179 ; (5

H, III.) x88; (13 H. IIL)

198 ; (27 H. III.) 440 ; his

Chronicle, 308-84
Muscamp, Walter, 5 F. x, 240
Will de (33 H. IL)

X34; (48 H. IIL) 232
Musson, Hugh (27 H. III.) 427 ;

(34 H. IIL) 218
MUSTERS,MONASTERIUS,

MONACHUS—
Musters, Mr. Chaworth, of An-

nesley, 353-4-5
Monasterius, Alice, 40 H. 3,

224
Musters, Fulc (Certif.) 321
Monachas, Galf (c. 26 H. IL)

125; (c. J.) 97; (4 J.) 155;
(6 J.) 163 ; (21 H. IIL) 419-
22; (1 E. L) 237
Musters, Henry, 30 E. I, 47 1
Lucie, 55 H. 3, 236
Lycya, X3 E. x, 245
Lisiard (2 J.) 150 ; (14
J.) 399; (15 J.) 180
Mst. Rad, c. H. 2, 289
Monastarius, Robert (2X H. IL)

"7; (4 J.) 155

Monachus, Roger (3 J.) X53; (4

J.) 157; (5 J.) Jt6o; (6 J.)
163-6; (19 H. IIL) 206; (21
H. in.) 4X9-2X
Muston, Galf, 8 J., 171
Myners, Rich., 13 H. 4, 484
„ Wm., xo H. 6, 510
Myner, 10 H. 6, 499

Narsdale, Adam, 6 H. 6, 493
Natalie, Agatha, 2X H. 3, 420
Naureman, Norman, 18 H. 3,

205
Neapun, Rob., 39X
NEVIL, THE CHANCEL-
LOR, 367
Nevil, Alan, 4 H. 2, 103
Alice, 39 X

Andrew, 29 E. I, 258
Galf, 392; (6 H. IIL)
189; (21 H. III.) 4x2; (17
E. I.) 249

n

n

n

n

»,

n

S50

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Nevil, H., 14 J, 397
„ Hugo, (6 K.I.) 136; (6
J.) 162; (8 J.) 171; (12 T.)

176-7; (13 J) »78; (14 J.)
296; (16 J.) 182; (3 H. III.)

183-5; (8 H. HI.) 192; (13
H. HI.) 198; (14 H. III.)
200; (16 H. HI.) 202; (27
H. HI.) 434; (30 H. HI.)
214-5 ; (38 H. III.) 202 bis ;
(7 E. I.) 241

Nevil, Hugo fil John, 32 E. i,
260

NEVIL, JOHN FIL, THE
EARL OF WESTMOR-
LAND (13 H. IV.) 484 ;
brother of John (53 H. HI.)

235
Nevil, John (R. I.) 391 ; (I2 J.)

177; (13 J.) 178; (16 J.) 181;
(i3H.in.) 198; (14 H. IIL)
200; (i6 H, HI.) 202; (27
H. IH.) 443; (29 H. IH.)
213; (30 H. IH.) 214; (44
H. IH.) 228; (53 H. III.)
235; (7E. L)24i ; (9E. L)
243 ; (10 E. I )244; (15 E. L)
248 ; (6 E. H.) 468

Isabella, his wife, widow of
Sewell fil Henry, id,
Nevil, Jollan (23 H. H.) 121;

(6T.) 165; (27 H. HI.) 441
Nevil, Maihilde, 35 H. 3, 219
Peter, heir of, 6 H. 6, 490
Reginald, 24 E. I, 253
Rich, 18 E. I, 250
Robt., 12 H. 2, 108
Roger, 22 H. 3, 209
Sarra, 44 H. 3, 229
Wm. (3 J.) 153; (5 J.)
160; (6 J.) 166
Newark, the Dean, 14 J., 397
Galf, 40 H. 3, 225
„ fil John, 44 H. 3,
229
Newark, Rad (28 H. HI.) 213 ;

(31 H. IH.) 265
Newark, Walter, Serjeant of, 36

H. 3, 220
Newbold, Rob., 7 E. I, 249

„ Thos., 39 H. 3, 223

Newhall, Ralf, 44 H. 3, 229
Newmarch = Novomercato
Newmarch, Adam (4 J.) 156;
(16 J.) 181 ; (21 H. 3) 421-
41 ; (41 H. HI.) 226
Novomercarto, Hy., 22 H. 2, 121
Newmarch, Rann (3 J.) 153 ;
(4 J.) 155-6; (6 J.) 165-6;
(7 }•) 167, and Letitia his
wife, 336
Newstead, Prior of (9 J.) 174 ;
(22 H. IH.) 462 ; (27 H. IH.)
432; (30 E. I.) 475; (II E.

II.) 456

»»

>f

Newthorpe, Rich fil Wm., 19

H. 3, 206
Newtorp, Galf, 15 H. 2, iii
NEWETON, NIEUTON,

NIVETON, NEWTON—
Neweton, Ansellus, 2 H. 3, 410
Arthur (34 H. II.)

)}

135 ; (34 H. IL) 305

18 H. H.

)

Nieuion, Godwin (

115; (25 H. II.) 305
Newton, Hugo (Forester) 9 H.

3,193
Niveion, Pagan (Certif.) 305

Newton, Walt, fil Waltr, 9 H.

3, 193
Newigton, Step fil Walter, 14

H. 3, 199
Neyrunt, Rich (17 E. I.) 249;

(II E. II.) 452
Nicolas, Magr., 35 H. 3, 220
Nic le Serjeant, 21 E. I, 251
„ Propositus, 5 H. 3, 187
„ Robert, 4 E. i, 239
Nigel, 38, q8, 62, 32 H. 2, 133

„ Rait, of Sutton, 22 H. 2,

120
Nigel, Ralf, of Stratton, id.
Noble, Wm., 14 E. i, 246
dementia, his wife „
Nodars, Almaric, 32 H. 3, 216
Noir, Robert, 31 H. 2, 131
Nonancourt, Wm. (5 J.) 159 ;

(6 J.) 164
Nonne, Robt., 4 E. I, 239
NORFOLK, DUKES OF, 282;

6 H. 6, 48i5-8, 504
NORFOLK, DUCHESS

ELIZTH., 13 H. 4, 484
Norfolk, Gilbert (5 J.) 160; (7

J.) 171, 335
Norfolk, Roger, 9 H. 3, 193
Norhanton, Jo., 18 H. 3, 205
Normar, I H. 2, 99
Norman, of the Bridge, 43 H. 3,

227
Norman, 12 H. 2, 108

„ John, Wigorn, 22 H.

3, 209
Norman, Nic (34 H. III.) 218 ;

(27 H. III.) 429
Norman, Roger, 40 H. 3, 225
NORMANDY, THE DUKE

ROBERT, 385
NORMANDY, THE PRINCE

HENRY, 385
Norinanton, Alan, 8 J., 171

„ Heward, 12 H. 2,

loS
Normanton, John, 34 H. 3, 219

I E. I, 237 ; Rector of, II E.

2, 453
Normanton, Odo de, 12 H. 2,

108

Normanton, Rich, 41 H. 3, 226

Robt., 31 H. 2, 131

»»

Normanton, Robt. fil Rich., H.

28, 29
Normanton, Wm. (13 H. IIL)
• 349 ; fil Ralf, 352
Normanville, Norman, H. 2, 277
Ralf (4 J.) 156; (5

J.) 159; (6 J.) 162; (16 J.)

182; (6H. IIL) 188; (8H.

IIL) 191; (14 H. IIL) 200;

(21 H. IH.) 417-24-47 ; (27

H. IIL) 437; (48 H. Ill)

232; (53 H. IIL) 235

Gerald, his son

Normanville, Rich., 27 H. 3,438

„ ThoF., Harestan

(4E. L) 239-40; (30 E. L)

259
NOREIS, NORRIS,

NORREYS—
Noreis, Alan, 13 E. I, 246
Norris, Alexr., Claworth, 29 E.

1.258
Norreys, Hy. le (27 H. III.)

432 ; (53 H. III.) 235
Noreis, Hy. fil Hy., 19 H. 3,

206
Noreis, Robert (32 H. III.) 216 ;

(50H. HL)233
Noreis, Thos,, 392
Norrisisons, Robt, 27 E. I, 255
Norse (see Nuers)
Norse, Amaur de. 10 H. 3, 194
Nortburg, W^, 4 E. i, 239
North, John, Bobinhill, 10 H.

6,499
Northambir, Jo. fil Jo., 16 H. 3,

203
Northampton, Maurice, and

Natalie, his wife, 1 1 E. 2, 454
NORTHAMPTON, SIMON,

THE EARL (1102)322
Northwork, R., a Judge, 458
Norton, Galf (6 J.) 164; (7 J.)

171
Norton, Ralf, 34 H. 2, 135

,, Robt., 3" E. 3, 480

NORTON, THOS., LORD, 21

E. I, 481

Norton, Wm., 43 H. 2, 227

Norwell, Fulc, 16 H. 2, 112

Norwich, Epis, 6 J., 165

Notries, Hy. le, i E. I, 238

Matilde, his wife ,,
Nottingham, Men of, I E. i, 237

,, Monks of, 31 H. I,

98
Nottingham, Brien, 12 J., 176
„ Galf fil Jo., 40 H.

3» 224
Nottingham, John, 55 H. 3, 236

Margerie, his wife
Nottingham, Margaret, 26 H.

2, 126
Nottingham, Simon, former

Bailiff of Derby, 16 E. i, 249

INDEX OF PERSONS.

551

Nottinghanii Thos., 16 H. 2, 1 10
Nottingham, Teobald, 2 J., 148
Notton, John, 48 H. 3, 233
Nova villa, H., 14 J., 398
Novcrs, Robt., 21 H. 3, 415
Novomercato, see Newmarch
Novoforo, Ad., 390 ; (5 T.) 160

„ Rann, $ J., 160
Nuers, Aumericus, 12 H. 3, 195

Robt., 48 H. 3, 233
Nunvilers, John, 27 11. 3, 436
Nunry, Robt., 25 E. i, 254
Nutal, Dna, 16 J., 181
' Nutall, Rich., 37 H. 3, 221
Hugo, id.

9>

ObtOD, Hugh fil Herbert, 2 J.,

148 (see Osberton)
Ocleton, Unfred, 10 H. 3, 195

Wm., his brother, iti,
Odincar, 61
Oddingselles, Gerard (21 H.

III.) 417 ; (27 H. in.) 443 ;

(30 E. I.) 472
Oddingselles, Oliver (37 H. III.)

221 ; (39 H. III.) 223
Margaret, his wife ,,
OfTerton, Adam, i J., 147
Oggeston, Robt. , of Derby, 394

lns\ (1252) 351
Oggeston, Wm. fil Robt. 349 ;

(1275) 35» ; (1252) 351
Oil de bcuf (WelbeuQ Henry, 24

H. 2, 123
Oketon, John, 12 E. i, 245

I, J.. 55 H. 3, 237
„ Ralf, 53 H. 3, 23s
Omerod's Hist, of Cheshire, 299
Ondesley, Thomas, 13 £. i,

246
Orderich, Mai^. fil Ralf, 24 £.

^ 253
Ordericus, Vitalis, 335-52
Ordeshall, Jo. fil Nic, 48 H. 3,

2j2

Ordeshale, Peter, 27 E. i, 255

„ Robt., 4 J., 157

Orm, D., 45, 50

„ Propositus, 23 H. 2, 1 21

„ Pistor, 27 H. 2, 126
Ormenellus, 396
Ormer, D., 41

Orrcby, Dna Alice, 13 H. 4, 484
,, Gilbert, 43 H. 3, 227 bis
„ John (14 J.) 399, 400;

(21 H. III.) 416-23-24; (27

H. III.) 436.7.47-8 ; fil Robt.

(22 H. III.) 461
Orreby, Philip, c. J., 303

„ Thos., 10 H. 6, 510
Orwit, Osbert, 24 H. 2, 123
Osbert of Oscinton, 16 H. 2, 1 12

„ of Lalega, 15 H. 2, 11 1

9f

Osberton, Roger (21 II. III.)

434; (26 H. III.) 212; see

Obton
Osevill, Wm., 26 E. i, 255
Osgot, Presb., 31 H. i, 98
Oskinton, Ralf fil Rd., 16 H. 3,

203
Osleston, 295
Osmaston, 306
Osmer, D., 37

„ the Priest, D., 68
Osmund, D., 49 bis ; 60, 66 bis
,, Benz, 66
„ (Bradeshall) 6 H. 3,

193
Osmund, John, Alfreton, 21 £.

1,481

Osmundesthorpe, Bald, 16 E. i,

249
Osmantorp, Hugo, 25 H. 2, 124

OsmoDcleston, Hugo, 34 II. 2,

135
Ossington, Henry, 5 E. i, 240

Osteille, Durand, 22 II. 2, 118

Ostarius (see Hoslarius)

Wm. D., 384-5

Roger (Wm. II.) /V/.

Ostricer, John, 34 H. 3, 218

„ Rich, 39 H. 3, 223

„ Wm. fil Wm., 55 H. 3,

236
Oler, Wm., 27 H. 3, 445
Oto, Will fil (Certif.) 305
Otelle, Adam, 2 H. 3, 410
Owthorpe, John, xo H. 6, 498
OxbrooK, Gilbert de, 12 II. 2,

108
Oxeye, Wm., 27 E. i, 255
Ouume, 52
Oyelles, John, Derby, 19 H. 3,

206
Oyelles, Hugh, 13 J., 179
Oylly, Roger (parson of Boulton)

31 E. I, 260

Paddely, Marg. fil Hy., 5 H.

3,187
Paddely, Robert, 10 H. 6, 501

Paesvil, Wm., 14 J., 180

Pagemore, Robert, 25 E. i, 254

Painell, 11 H. 2, 107

„ Fulk (1198)387; (6 J.)

165; (14 J.) 402

Painell, Wm., 132

Pakeman, Simou (4 T.) 156 ; (5

J.) 159; (13 J.) 178
Palmer = Paumer

Palmer, Gilb, 13 H. 3, 196

,, John (21 H. III.) 415 ;

(27 E. I.) 256
Palmer, Rich, 40 H. 3, 224
Paumer, Alan le BailitV of Not-

tingham, 14 E. x, 246

Paumer, Thos. (27 H. III.) 427 ;

(34 H. III.) 218
PaJmer, Turchil, 23 H. 2, 122
,. Wm.(8J.)i7i; (13 H.

III.) 196-7
Palmer, Wulfr, 18 H. 2, 115 bis
Palton, Waltl (1273) 303
Pameter (Paunton) Alex., 2 J.,

150
Panton, Bald. (25 H. II.) no;

(under sheriff) (24 H. III.)

209 ; (sheriff) (27 H. III.)

443 (see Paunton)
Pantoul, Wm. (Certif.) 289, 384
Pape, Hy. (Magnahora) 14 H.

3,201
Papewyc, Jordan, 14 E. x, 247
Parigni, Havis, ux Roland

Avenel, c H. 2, 297
Paris, John, 16 £. i, 248

„ Roger, X3 H. 3, 197
Parcar, Adam, 21 E. 3, 481
Park, Adam fil Walter, 9 E. i,

242
Parker, Thos., 10 H. 6, 507

,, Wm., LuUington, 33 E.

X, 26X
Parkin, Hugo, Cottingham, 21

E. I, 252
Paries, Wm., XX J., 304
Parmenter, Hugh, 35 H. 2, X35
„ Roger, xo H. 3, 194
,, Stephen, xi K. 2,

452
Parvus, Ralf (Certif.) 288

„ Robert (II J.) 175; (12

J-)I76
Parvus, Agnes, 346
Passeis, Alan (34 H. III.) 218;

(27 H. III.) 429
Passeis, Alice fil Robert (27 IF.

III.) 429; (34 H. III.) 218;

(36 H. III.) 220
Passeis, John (2 H. III.) 393 ;

(21 H. III.) 415
Passeis, Robert (5 J.) 159; (6

J.) X64; (14 J.) 397; (27 H.

III.) 434; filWm. (1x98)383
Passeis, Wm. fil Robt., 29 H. 3,

213
Passeis, Wm. (4 H. II.) 382;

(23 H. II.) 131; (27 H. III.)

429 ; (33 H. III.) 383
Passelew, Robt., his serjeanlies,

379 ; 27 H. 3, 424
Passur, Gilb., 12 J., 177
Pastas, Adam fil, 16 H. 3, 203
Paste, Henry, 4 J., 154
Patric, Robert, 21 H. 3, 420

,, Wm. (13 J.) no; (22

H. III.) 208; (28 H. III.)

212 ; (31 H. III.) 215
Patteshall, Simon, 8 R. x, 363
Paulinus, Cicely, wo. of, 4 E. x,

239

552

Paunton (see Pannenter, Panton)
» Jac, 43 H. 3, 227

Phil. (21 E. I.) 251 ;
(26 E. I.) 254; (31 E. I.)
259
Paunton, Robt., 40 H. 3, 225
Paustowe, John, 11 E. 2, 452

Pavelle,Galf.(3j.)i53; (4 J.)
156; (5 J.) 158-9; (6 J.) 164;
(7 J.) 16870; (16 J.) 181; (3

H. III.) 184; (8 H. III.)
191 ; (46 H. III.) 231
Pavelle, Hugh, 44 H. 3, 230
„ Laurence (33 E. I. ) 262 ;
(4 E. II.) 465
Pavelle, Rich, 55 H. 3, 237
„ Robt. (7 E. I.) 241 ; of
Rotington (28 H. II.) 128
Pavelle, Robt. (13 H. III.) 198;
(14 H. III.) 200; (15 H. III.)
201 ; (16 H. III.) 202 ; (21
H. III.) 418-9 ; (25 H. III.)
210; (30 H. III.) 214; (33
H. III.) 216; (38 H. III.)
222; (43 H. III.) 228; (7
E. I.) 241 ; (15 E. I.) 247
Payne, Waller (39 II. III.) 222 ;
(43 H. III.) 227; (48 H. III.)
232
Pain, Robt., I E. I, 238
Amflig, his wife ,,
Pec, Melius de, ii H. 2, 107
Hugh, 5 J., 157
Malildefil Nic, 13 J., 178
Ric. (31 H. II.) 131 ; (c.
H. II.) 345 ; and Matitde, his
wife, iiL\ (13 H. III.) 196
Pec, Rich fil Wm., 2 J., 151
„ Robt. (31 H. Ill,) 196;
(II E. n.)453; (21 E. III.)
480
Pec, Roger, 10 H. 6, 502
„ Wm. de (34 H. II.) 135 ;
(20 E. I.) 251; (10 II. VI.) 504
Pecoc, Rich, 39 H. 3, 223
Peinerton, Roger, 21 E. 3, 479
Peissun, Robt., 7 J., 169
Peleslin, liernard, 16 H. 2, 112
Pencest, Stephen, 21 H. 3, 414
Penwis, Rich fil Mic, 22 H. 3,

208
Penwich, Thos., 29 E. i, 258
Pepellarius, Ailfus, 21 H. 2, 117
PERCY, HONOUR OF, 447
Percy (Anesty) 31 E. I, 260

„ Johanna, 28-29 E. i, 257

Percy, Wm. (8 R. I.) 367; (17

H. III.) 240; (21 H. III.)

417; (23 H. IH.) 209; (27

H. III.) 443
Perers, Robt. de, 55 H. 3, 237

Perers, Tho?., 1 1 E. 2, 455

Pescur, Geranl, 11 E. 2; 452

„ Robt., Shelford, 6 E. i,

240

>f

*»

t»

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Pessun, Durand, 46 H. 3, 230

Alice, his wife, id.
Peter of Nottingiiam, 27 H. 2,

127
Peter, Clericus (Cestre) 11 J.,

»75
Petit, Rog (S. Muscam) 13 E.

I, 246
Petit, Wm., Halum, 43 H. 3,

227
Peton, Fulc fil Fulc, 351
Peut, Hy., 22 H. 3, 208
PEVEREL, BARONY, 360,

354, 446
Peverel, Adeline, 31 H. i, 98,

103 bis
Peverel, Hamon, 31 H. I, 98
Robt., H. 2. 277
Wm. (D.)28i
Peverel, Wm., 25, 31 ^li, 32 bis^

36,98 (31 H. I.) (2 H. II.)

102, 268; (14 J.) 397-8; (14

H. III.) 199; (22 H. III.)

208; (27 H. III.) 212
Peverelscote, Wm., 27 H. 3, 436
Peversthorp, John, 33 H. 3, 217
Peverwys, Thorn., 24 E. 1,

253
Peyn, Wm., Rotington (21 E.

I.) 252; (II E. II.) 452; see

Payn
Peytevin, Robert, 1 22
,, Roger, 333
Phator, Robt., 22 H. 2, 118
Philip, Jo., 13 H. 4, 484
Pickering, Alan, 33 H. 2, 154
Pickford, Ralf, 27 H. 3, 444
Picot, Andrew, 16 H. 2, 112

„ Elias (27 H. III.) 428;

(34 H. III.) 218
Picot, Helewise fil John, 24 E.

.1,253
Picot, Helewise, wo. of John,

25 E. I, 254
Picot, John, 53 II. 3, 235

„ John, Bekingham, 43 H.

3,227
Picot, Leticia, 27 H. 3, 425
Picot, Meroda, d. of Rich., 27 E.

I, 257 ; Thos., id. „

Picot, Peter, sheriff (1198) 382;

(5 J.) 160: (6 J.) 165; (14 J.)

492; (2 H. III.) 393-4; (9

H. III.) 193; (8 E. I.) 242;

(10 E. I.) 243; (26 E. I.)

254; (32 E. I.) 260
Picot, Peter, jun., 24 E. I, 253

„ Peter hi Peter (13 J.) 178;

(16 J.) 180; (3H. III.) 184;

(27 E. I.) 256
John, his brother ,,
Pictit, Thos. (12 H. III.) 411;

(27 H. III.) 428-34 ; (32 H.

III.) 216; (35 H. III.) 220
Picot, Wm., 26 H. 2, 125

Piesse, Robt., 4 H. 2, 103

„ Wm. fil Robert, 28 H. 2,

129
Pikehall, Wm. (12 H. III.) 196 ;

(14H. IIl.)20i;(43H. III.)

227
Pink, Benedict, 44 H. 3, 230
Pirpoint, Dna, 30 E. i, 471
„ Edward, Chev., 13 H.

4, 484
Pirpoint, Hy. (22 H. VlV.) 462 ;

(4E. I.)239; (10 E. I.) 243;

(10 H. VI.) 496-505
Perepoint, John (27 H. III.)

429 ; (41 H. III.) 226
Pierpoint, Rpbt., 34 E. I, 262
Pilecote, JoHh, 12 E. i, 245
Pilkini^ton, Rich., 10 H. 6, 502
Pincelbec, Gilb., 50 H. 3, 234
Pincerna, Albreda fil Rd., 6 R.

I. 136

,, Aumericus fil Wm.,

18 H. 3, 2056
Pincerna, Daniel, Wormhill, 6

J., 162
Pincerna, Hugh, 27 H. 3, 437 ;

(Devon) 334
Pincerna, Jo. (6 J.) 162 ; (34
• H. III.) 218
Pincerna, Nic, 3 H. 3, 183
„ Ralf, 4 E. I, 239

,, Rich, of Crophill (23

H. II.) 123; (46 H. III.)
231
Pincerna, Robt., H. 2, 289
,, Wm., Hocreton, (22

H. II.) 120; (1198) 389,391 ;

(3 J.) 152; (4 J.) 156; (5 J.)
160; (6 J.) 162-6 ; (22 H. III.)
208 ; (23 H. III.) 183
Pincerna, Wm., Tichill, 4 J.,

155

Pincerna, Wm. (6 R. I.) 136;

(20 H. III.) 207
Pincerna, Wm. fil Daniel (8 H.

III.) 190; (19 H. III.) 206
Pincun, Rich., 17 J., 182
Pinzun, Rich., 5 H. 3, 187
Pinder, Lodosa, wo. of Rad, 12

E. I, 245
Pinder, Robt., 1 1 E. 2, 452
Pingnant, see Poignant
Pinkeny, Walter, 10 E. I, 243
Pipard, John, 33 H. 3, 217
Ralf, 20 E. 3, 475
PIPE ROLL SOCIETY, 266
Piper, Rich., 6 H. 3, 483, 510

„ Rad (22 H. IH.) 460;

(30 E. L) 259
PIR, PIRI, PIRU, PIRARIO,

PIROT—
Pir, Robt. (Certif.) 309
Piri, Robt., Dup., H. 2, 289
„ Thos., H. 2, 289
Piru, Thos., 310

INDEX OF PERSONS.

553

Pin,Wm. (1178)310
Pirot, Wm , 4 J., 154
Pirark), Robt. (i H. II.) 99;

(4 H. III.) 103, 105
Pirario, Wm., 23 H. 2, 122
Pistor, Maurice, 32 H. 3, 216

,, Robi., Eperston (17 £.

I.) 249; (II E. II.) 453
Pitcalf, Roger, 8 J., 172

Margaret, his wife
Piterel, Rich., 21 H. 3, 421
Placegian, Wm., 6 H. 6, 493
Plantfolie, Philip fil Elie, 53 H.

3,235
Plascien, John, 10 H. 6, 506
Plastow, John fil Galfry (1252)

35«
Plastow, Peter, his brother, id,

Plesley, Serlo (Ccrtif.) 158, 354 ;

(19 H. II.) 115.6; (22 H. II.)

120; (26 H. 11.) 125 ; (22

H. III.) 461
Plucket, Hugh, 13 H. 2, 109
Plucket, Ralf, 6 J., 163
Plumbariis, Roger, 9 H. 3, 193
Plumley, Wm., 10 H. 6, 496
Plumpton, Robt. (clic.) 13 H. 4,

484
Plumpton, Wm., 10 H. 6, 498,

508-9
Plumtree, John, lo H. 6, 505
Rich. (14 H. III.)

201 ; of Nottingham (27 H.

III.) 212
Plumtree, Robt., 13 H. 4, 484
Plungar, Wm., 35 H. 3, 219
Poher, see Puher

,, Durand, Devons., 334

„ Ramilf (21 H. III.) 416-

23 ; (27 H. III.) 446
Poher, Roger (22 H. II.) 120 ;

(14 J.) 395; (5 H. III.) 185
Poer, rhos., 7 E. i, 241

„ Wm. (Devons) 334
Poictou, John, 11 £. 2, 4^2

Roger, 25, 35 ; .(H. I.)

389
Poignant, Felicia fil Wm., (27

H. III.) 428; (34 H. III.)

218

Poland, Jo., Judge, 458

POLE, see POWIS—

Pole, Edmund, 10 H. 6, 504

Elizabeth, 10 H. 6, 502

Henry, 10 H. 6, 498

John, Hertington, 10 H.

6, 499, 509
Pole, Peter (13 H. IV.) 484;

(6 H. VI.) 486.92; (10 H.

VI.) 510
Pole, Richard, 6 H. 6, 493
Pollard, Ralf, 16 H. 3, 203
Pomfret, Roger, brother of

Thos. de Belfou, 23 H. 2,

123

40

>i

t»

)f

Poncher, Wm.,ajew (20 E. III.)

474 ; (21 E. III.) id.
Pong, Wm., 30 E. i, 469
Ponger,Wm. (27E. I.)255; (21

E. III.) 474
Ponger, Will, 27 E. i, 255
Poniz, Hugh, Gloucestershire,

22 H. 3, 209
Ponte, Rich., Collingham, 14

H. 3. 199
Ponte, Robert de, 12 H. 3, 197
Pontearch, Rd., 23 H. 2, 121
Pontesbury, David fil Roger, 29

E. I, 259
Pontesoen, Rich., 11 E. 2, 454
Pope, Wm., 6 H. 6, 485
Poppers, Walter, 27 E. i, 255
Porcel, Owen, H. 2, lOO
Porta, Swein, 31 H. I, 98
Port, John, H. 2, 276

,, Robert le, Codington, 48

H. 3, 232
Porter, Alan, 27 H. 3, 429

„ Eleanor, 34 H. 3, 218

„ Robert, 2 H. 3, 394
Potloc, John, 55 H. 3, 237
,, Swein, 22 H. 2, 121
Poutrel, Rich., 27 H. 3, 438
Powes, Thos., 10 H. 6, 508
POWIS, MEREDITH, 17 H.

2, 113 (see Wenhanwin)
PowiSy Roger; 12 H. 2, 113
Poyne, Jo., Bradmere, 55 H. 3,

237
Poynton, John, 10 H. 6, 501

Prat, Jo., Retford, 31 E. 1, 260

„ Roger, Greneley, 11 E. 2,

452
Preed, Rich., 11 £. 2, 452

Prentis, J., 10 H 6, 502

Prest, Robt., 15 H. 2, 116

Prestcliff, Asser, 28 E. I, 258

Prestclive, Robt., 29 H. 3, 213

Preston, Gilbert, of Nottingham

(38 H. III.) 221 ; (46 H. III.)

231
Priesiley, Julia, wo. of Peter,

43 H. 3, 226
Pride, John, 27 H. 3, 444
Propositus, Richard, 1 1 £. 2, 452
„ Wm., 392

Matilde, his wife, 392
Proudfot, Rico, 25 E. i, 254
Proyost, Rich., 28 H. 3, 213
Prynce, Ricli., 10 H. 6, 508
Puher, Roger, 22 H. 2, 120
Pull, Ralf, 8 E. I, 242
Pullo, Wm., 26 H. 2, 125
Punha, Wm., Cap, 39 H. 3, 224
Purley, Hen., 10 H. 6, soo
Purslow, Rich., 10 H. 6, 501
Pusei, Avorel, 15 H. 2, no
Putrel, Hy. (2 J.) 149; (44 H.

III.) 2^0; (48 H. III.) 232;

(27 E. I.) 255

>>

Putrel, Richard, 21 H. 3, 418
Pymme, Wm. (27 H. III. ) 407 ;

(34 H. III.) 218
Pyn, Hugh, 4 E. i, 239

Quarrel, Ivone, 34 H. 3, 219
Quartrelmc, Saml., 12 J., 177'
QUEEN, ISABELLA (20 E.

IV.) 476; (6 H. VL) 486-8
Queenborough, John, 11 E. 2,

452
Quenilde, Rob., n E. 2, 453
Querdlion, Rog., 1 1 E. 2, 454
Querndon, Hy., 1 1 E. 2. 455
Queron, Wm., 14 J., 399
Quilli, Walter, 5 E. 1, 240
Quincey, Havise, 43 II. 3, 228
,, Robert, 35 H. 3, 220

Raback, Robt., 4 £. I, 239
Rabarce, Gervase fil Gervase,

21 H. 3,413
Rabarce, Robt., heir, 16 F. 1,
248
Alice
Race, Robt., i E. I, 238
Rad, 31 H. 2, 131
Radclive, Anselinus, 316
„ John, 14 H. 3, 201
,, Ran fil Ran, 48 H. 3,

232
Radclive, Reginald (Certif.) 316
„ Magr. Stephen, lo H.

3. »9S
Radclive, Stephen, 12 H. 2, 108

,, Wm., 8 II. 3, 190

Radford, John, 11 J., 175

„ Robert fil Hugh, 4 H.
3. 187
Radlun, Turbot, 21 H. 3, 117
Radval, Ralf, 55 H. 3, 237

Alice, ux ej.
Ragged, Ralf le, 4 E. r, 239

Rich. (II J.) 175; (25
•H. IIL) 210; (41 H. IH.)
226; (II E. n.)455
Ragged, Robert (9 J.) 172 ; (28

£. L) 258
Ragged, Robt., Stavely, 28 £.

I, 258
Ragged, Robt., Castleton, 28 E.

1,258
Ragged, Thos. le (16 E. I.) 249;
(18 £. I.) 250; (II £.11.) 455
Margt., his wife ,,

Ragge, Will (21 H. III.) 208 ;

Longley (28 E. i) 258
Ralegh, Hugo fil, 1 1 £.2, 453

„ W., 23 H. 3, 209
Ralf, Jocelta, widow of, 53 H.

3, 235
Ralf, Juvenis, 24 H. 2, 124

554

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Radulf, 41 bis,, 44 bis.^ 57 ^f>.,

60 bis
Rad fil Rad, 7 J., 170
Ralkman, Ralf, 22 H. 3, 208
RAMPTON, RAUTON,

RAMENTONA (see Maluvel)
Kamton, Jo. (16 H. III.) 203;

(14 E. I.) 246
Ramentona, Nigel de, 33 H. I,

Ramton, Pavia (3 J.) 453 ; (4

J.) 154-7; (5 J.) »6o; (6 J.)

166
Ramton, Robt., 53 H. 3, 235
Rankelli, Wm. Hocklowe, 28

£. I, 258
Raper, Jo., 10 H. 6, 505
Rapes, Wm., 418 (see Rufus)
Rastal, Roger, 14 J., 398
RATCLIFF, SERJEANTY,

428
Ratcliff, Robert, Parson of, 27

H. 3, 427
Ravelston, Wm., 40 H. 3, 224
Raven, 36, 47, 65

„ Henry (27 H. III.) 427 ;

(34 H. III.) 218
Raven, Matilde, 34 H. 3, 218
iUvenesbi, Walter (2 J.) 118;

(5 J.) 157
Ravenchel, D., 49

Ravenstone, Galf, 5 H. 3, 187

Guy, 5 H. 3, 187

Raynouuard, D., 56

Redman, Thos., 28 E. i, 258

Redham, Christopher, 10 H. 6,

501
Redmile de, Wm., 1 1 E. 2, 452-3
Rednes, Hy. (4 H. ill.) 187 ;

(6 H. III.) 188
Redvers, Thos., 21 E. 3, 479
Reginald, Miller (Elpiston) 27

H. 3, 212
Re^n, Robert, 14 H. 3, 201
Remgod, Serjt., $ H. 3, 188
Rempston, Magr John, 28 £. i,

257
Rempston, John (Bailiff) Nottm.,

23 E. I, 252
Rempston, Margaret (13 H. IV.)

484 ; wo. of- Thomas (6 H.

VI.) 485; (10 H. VI.) 499.

506
Rempston, Ralf (i E. III.)

237-8 ; (13 E. I.) 246
Rempston, Robt. (38 H. III.)

221 ; (39 H. III.) 224 ; (8

E. I.) 242
Rempston, Thorn (19 £.1.) 251 ;

(10 H. VI.) 496-502
Rempston, Wm., 6 £. 2, 468
RENNES, RAINES, RAMES,

KEGNES, REIGNI—
Rennes, Leonia, 343-5, 353 ; 21

H. 3, 413 (see Stuteville)

Rames, Alex. (43 H. III.) 226 ;

(44 H. III.) 229-30 bis ; (46

II. III.) 231
Havice, his wife
Reigni, Wm., 334

Wm., his nephew, id.
Rependon, Galfry, 11 J., 175
„ Prior (10 H. III.)

194; (21 H. III.) 422
Rependon, Simon, i(; H. 6, 502
Reresby, Adam, 20 E. 3. 476
Reresby, John fil Nicholas, 10

H. 6, 510
Reresby, Margaret, wo. of Rich,

7 E. I, 241
Reresby, Nich (13 H. IV.)

484; (c 6 H. VI.) 490; (10

H. VI.) 483-500
Reresby, Ralf (27 H. III.) 428 ;

(Coroner) (53 H. III.) 235 ;

(30 E. I.) 471-6
Reresby, 61 Eudo, 3J4

„ Ralf fil Ralf, 27 H. 3,

448
Reresby, Robt. (c 22 H. III.)

461; (13 E. I.) 246; (26

E. I.) 254; (31 E. I.) 260

Johanna, his wife „.

Reresby, Thomas, of Thryberg,

10 H. 6, 496
Reseby, Robt., 1 1 E. 2, 454
Rescuchun, ]ohn, 32 H. 3, 216
Retford, John, 43 H. 3, 227

Rich fil Rich, 18 H. 3,

205
Retford, Robtfrt fil Richard, 351
Reynd&n, Mathew, 33 H. 3, 217
Reynesford, Hy. fil Ranulf,

Chaddesden, 46 II. 3, 230
Rhodes, Gerard (i J.) 146; (14

J.) 402; (16 J.) 181-2; 3 H.

III.) 185; (8 H. III.) 192;

(27 H. III.) 439-46; (28

H. III.) 213 ; (21 E. I.) 252 ;

(50 H. III.) 234
Isabella, his wife, id.
Ralf, his father, id.
Rhodes, Hugh, bro. Henry, 34

E. I, 262
Rhodes, John, 5 E. I, 240

„ Kalf (2 H. III.) 407 ;

(6 H. III.)i88; (12 H. III.)

411 ; (14 H. III.) 200-1 ; (21

H. III.) 419-22 ; (30 E. I.)

259
Rodes, Walter, 20 H. 3, 207
Rode, Will de la, 25 H. 3, 210
Richard, Abbot, li H. 2, 107

„ Abb. St. Peter's sur

Dive., c. H. 2, 289
Richard, Dap., EarlFerrars, ill
,, (clic.) Stirap, 48 H.

3. 232
Richard, Propositus, 34 H. 2,

135

Richard, Propositus, of Ernhale,

4 H. 2, 103
RICHMOND, EARL OF, 21

E. 3,480
RICHMOND, HONOUR, 433
Richmond, Odo, 26 H. 3, 211,

212
Richmond, Rich. (31 H. I.) 94 ;

(26 H. II.) 125
Ridel, Galf (Ceriif.) 352, 353

Geva, his wife, id.
Ridel, John, Bassamby, 458
Rideslea, Adam, 22 H. 2, 120
Rifrgeway, John fil Stephen, 41

H. 3, 225
RED WALE, RLDWAR, RED-
WARE—
Redwale, Adam, 27 H. 3, 439
„ Nigel, 38 H. 3, 222
Redwar, Nigel, 48 H. 3, 233
„ Ralf fil Serlo, 33 E. i,

261
Redwar, Richard fil Serlo, 11

E. 2, 454
Redwar, Roger (32 £.1.) 261 ;

(33 E. I.) 261
Redwar, Serlo, 261
Redware, Thos. fil Nigel, 17 E.

I. 250
Redware, Walter (20 E. IIL)

475 ; (6 H. VI.) 483-93
Redware, Wm. (16 H. II.) 112;

(7 R. I.) 372; (13 J.) 178;

(14 T.) 179; (37 H. IIL) 221
Riebof, Celestine, wo. of Walter,

26 H. 3, 211
Riebof, John, 10 H. 6, 510
„ Richard (21 H. III.)

420 ; (22 H. III.) 461 ; (30

E. L)472; (20 E. IIL) 475
Riebof, Robert, 1 1 E. 2, 454

„ Walter (22 H. IIL) 459-

96; (27 H. IIL) 444; (35 H.

III.) 226, 351
Eva, his wife, id.
Rigg, Ralf, iiE. 2,452-3
Riparia, Andrew, 9 H. 3, 193
Ripelea, Siward, 12 H. 2, 108
Ripon, Mathew, 14 J., 397

„ Thos., 14 J., 396
Rishala, Rich., 12 H. 2, 108
Riskinton, Gerald, 44 H. 3, 229
Rislea, Wm. (28 H. IL) 128;

(21 H. IIL) 416-24; (27 H.

III. 446 ; fil Robert (27 H.

IIL) 438
Riston, Rich (1198) 385; (21

H. IIL) 413
Rival, Peter, 18 H. 3, 205
ROBERT, BISHOP OF LIN-
COLN (IX 12) 326
Robert, Abbot of Burton (1150-

9)287
Robert, parson of Ratciiffe, 34
H, 3, 218

INDEX OF PERSONS.

SS5

Robert of Newstead, 15 H. 2, 1 1 1
Robert, uncle of Earl Ferrars,

(1175) 286
Robert (the roan of Vesci) x6 H.

2, 112
Robert (Fisherman) 17 J., 182
„ Prop, of Bols., 5 J., 157
„ D., 32. 41, 43, 46, 47,

50 6/s., 51, 56 A/ J, 57
Roby, Herbert, 10 H. 3, 195 bis
Roc, Hugo, 35 H. 3, 219
Roceto, Hugh fil To. (1037) 296
Roche, Ga\tj i^ H. 2, 1 1 1
Rochel, Godwin, 5 £. i, 240
Rocheford, John (25 E. I.) 254 ;

(20 E. III.) 481
Rocheford, John fil Ralf, 20 E. 3,

475

„ Peter, 39 H. 3, 224

„ Ralf (27 E. I.) 256 ;
(30 E. I.) 472
Rochford, Wido, c. H. 2, 289
Rodeston (see Rolleston)
Rodmerthwaite, Alan, 48 H. 3,

233
Rodmerthwaite, Alan fil Robt.,

3S H. 3, 219
Rodmerthwaite, Hugh (11 J.)

175; (48 H. in.) 233; (10

E. I.) 243
Rodmersfeld, Hugh, ii J., 175
Roer, Robert, 16 H. 3, 203
ROGER, THE EARL, 2 H. 3,

410
Roger, the Dean, 8 J., 171 ; clic.

of Derby, 349, 352
Roger (Chap, of Earl Ferrars)

c. H. 2, 289
Roger, Simon, ii J., 175

„ fil Propositus, xo H. 3,

194
Roger, 38 */>, 40, 44, 50
Rokel, Rich.. 22 H. 3, 459
Rokeston, Tom, 15 J., 146
Rokesby, Hugo, 25 E. I, 254
Rok worth, Alan fil Hugh, 46

H. 3i 231
Rolder, John, 10 H. 6, 502
RoUesly, John, 10 H. 6, 499
ROLESTON, RODLESTUN,

ROLLESTON, ROSLO-

VESTON, ROLVESTON—
ROLLESTON, THE LADY

AMFLID, wo. of Jolland de

Neville, 2 H. 3, 406
Rolleston, Andrew fil Benedict,

13 E. I, 246
Rolleston, Benedict (43 H. IIL)

226; (44 H. Ill,) 230; (46

H. in.) 230
RoUeston, Hy. (14 J.) 179; (5

H. HL) 188; (12 H. HL)

197; (24 E. L) 253; (26 E.

L)2S5; (27 E. L) 255; (II

E. n.) 454

Rolleston, Henry fil Gilbert, 24

E. I, 253
Rolleston, Hugh, 46 H. 3, 230
„ John(6n.VL)493;

(10 H. VL) 505-6-9-10
Rolleston, Ralf hi Godfrey, 22

H. 3,208
Rolleston, Robt. (26 H. H.)

125; (29 H. n.) 129; (13 H.

IIL) 196 ^ff
Rolleston, Robert fil Andrew,

24 E. I, 253
Beatrice, his wife, id.
Rolleston, Wm. (6 H. VI.) 490-

2 ; (10 H. VL) 503-6-10
Romeisin, 22 H. 2, 120
Romeisus, Forester, 12 H. 2, 108
Romley, Wm., 21 E. 3, 480 (see

Kumeli)
ROS, RUS, ROSE—
Ros, Isai)ella, 28 E. I, 257
„ John le, 50 H. 3, 233
„ Hugh
„ Robt. (24 H. in.) 210;

(27 H. IIL) 212
Ros, Roger (26 H. HL) 211 ;

Eyam (ix £. IL) 454
Ros, Wm. (21 H. IIX.) 4x4 ;

(22 H. IIL) 459 ; (27 E. I.)

255; (30 E' I.) 470; (20 E.

IIL) 475
Roshal, Giles, I x E. 2, 452

Kosel, see Russel

Rotherfield, Peter, 36 H. 3,

220
Rotington, Gervase, i E^, i, 238

„ Wm. fil Roger „
Rotenden, Thos. fil Wm., 27 H.

3,212
Roucester, Rog., 41 H. 3, 226
Rouland, pson of Egrum, 4 E.

2,454
Roupel, Rob., 2 H. 3, 409
Rousel, John, 30 H. 3, 215
Rowarth, Robt., 10 H. 6, 500
Rowe, Henry, 11 E. 2, 454
Rowers, Robt. (Glossop) 10 H.

6, 501
Rowells, Rich., a Judge, 458
Roys, Nich, 23 E. i, 252
Ruden, Will, xo E. I, 243
Rudde, John, lo H. 3, 195
Rudding, Thos., 46 H. 3, 231
Rudham, Christopher, xo H. 6,

500
Rufib, Alex, (de Horsleg), 22

H. 2, 121
Rufford Abbev, Alan (21 H. HI.)

421; (II Ef. IL)455
RUFFUS, RUFF, RUFUS—
RufTus, Adam, 12 H. 3, 197
Galf, 8J., 171
Hugo, 2 H. 3, 410
Kau (Cam) 28 H. 2, 129

„ Robt., 12 J., 177

11

it

ft

Ruffus, Wm. (2 1.) 148; (II J.)
175; (16 H. III.) 203; (21
H. IIL) 412 21 ; (27 H. IIL)

436

Isabella, his wife, id,
Rufford, Abbot, 5 J., 158

„ Walter, 19 H. 3, 206
Rugg, Bald, 10 H. 6, 508
Rulhall, Peter, 14 H. 3, 201
Rumile, Avice fil Robt. (Skip-
ton) 334
Rumenil, David, 5 H. 2, 104
Runce, Rad de la, 27 II. 3,

432
Rupc, Abbot (27 H. IIL) 431 ;

(9 £. I.) 242
Rupe, Magr. Rich., 36 H. 3,

220
Rupe, Rich, 36 H. 3. 220
Ruperia, Robert, 31 H. i, 98
RUSSEL, ROSEL—
Russel, Henry, c. 22 H. 6,

459
Russel, Jo. (20 H. in.) 207;

(25 H. III.) 220; (48 H. IIL)

232; (53 H. nL)235; (6E.

IL) 468

Havise, his widow

Russel, Patric (Certif.) 320

Rad, 17 J., 182

Rich (13 E. L) 246;

(16 £. I.) 249

Rosel, Wm. (21 H. IIL) 417-24 ;

(27H. nL)447;(32H. HL)

216; (40 H. IIL) 225; (30

E. I.) 470

Rutindon, Adam fil Galf, 53 H.

3,235

Ruttingtofi, Agnes fil Wm., 5 J.,

158

Rutton, Rich., 17 H. 3, 204

Rye = Rya

Rye, Agnes de, 123

Eudo de, 298

Hubert (Devizes) 341

John (53 H. UL) 2345;

(10 E. I.) 243 ; (21 E. I.) 252 ;

(II E. IL) 452; (21 E. HI.)

479
Johanna, his wife

Rye, Maiildc, 341-5. 353

Ran fil John, 8 E. I, 242
Ralf fil Ralf, 339
Walter (history of the
family) 339
Rya, Wm. fil Wm. fil Roscelin,
316
Sibella, his daughter
Reygate, Thomas, 10 H. 6,

504
Reygate, Wm., 8 E. i, 242
Kynesal, Alexr., 48 H. 3, 233

„ Wm. fil Wm., id.
Rypton, Sarah, widow of Wm.,
34 H. 3, 219

tt

>>
It
tt

>f

>t

SS6

St. Amand s= St. Mount
St. Amand, Ailmer, Almeric,
Aumeric, 281 ; (c. 22 H.
III.) 462 ; (30 E. I.) 470 ; (20
E. III.) 486; (20 E. III.)
476 ; Almaric, grandson of
Almaric (20 E. III.) 476
Isabella Dna, 13 H. 4, 484
St. Andrew, John, 19 E. i. 251
Kobt.,46 H. 3,231
Win. (46 H. III.)
231 ; (13 E. I.) 246
St. Catherine, Lincoln, Prior of,

27 H. 3, 426
Sender, Wm. , 1 1 E. 2, 453
St. Cruc, Wm., 17 E. i, 249
St. Edmund, Kalf, 27 H. 3, 443
St. George, Ralf, 336 ; Mabel,
his wife, f</. ; (1198) 389; (4

T.)I55; (2 H. III.) 409; (18

H. III.) 205, 308; (21 H.

III.) 417-22
St. George, Robert (27 H. III. )

409 ; (34 H. III.) 217, 308
St. John, Laurence fil Laurence,

14 E. I, 246
St. John's Hospital, Nottingham,

27 H. 3, 429
St. John, Rob., 21 H. 2, 131
St. Lazarus, Burton (20 £. III.)

475; (6H. VL) 486-90
St. Leger, Matilde, 43 H. 3, 227
St. Leonards, Derby, 40 H. 3,

225
St. Licio, Robt., 25 E. i, 254 bis
Matilde fil Jo. de .Stokes,

his wife
St. Mary Ecclesia, Wm., 2 J.,

148
St. Maria, Adam and Albreda

(7 J.) 171 ; (12 J.) 116; (14

J.) 296; (16 J.) 181; (21 H.

in.)420; (27 H. in.) 439
St. Maria, Helie, 28 H. 2, 128
,, Hugo, 25 H. 2. 124
St. Maria, Reg. (17 H. II.) 112-

3; (18 H. IL) 113; (20 H.

n.) 116; <2S H. IL) 123
St. Mnria, Reginald, brother of

Helie,* 32 H. 2, 133
St. Maria, Sibel (25 H. III.)

210; (27 H. 111)439
St. Mauro, Simon (4 J. ) 1 57 ;

(3 H. III.) 134
St. Mauro, Wm. (14 J.) 398; (2

H. III.) 407
St. Michael, Laurence (24 H.

III.) 210; fil Laurence (27

H. in.) 434
St. Michael, Wm. (2 J.) 148;

(12 J.) 176; (17 J.) 182; (3

H. III.) 184; (7H. III.) 189
St. Palric, Galfry, 3 J., 142
St. Patric, Norman, 29 H. 2, 129
Family, id.

INDEX OF PERSONS.

St. Patric, Norman (6 R. I.)

136; (10 R.) 145
St. Patric, Rad, 12 J., 1 77

Rich., 5 H. 3, 188
„ Wm. (3 J.) 142-3; (6

J.) 163-4; (7 J.) 171; (9 J.)
173; (i6J.)i8i; (8H. in.)

191; (13 H. III.) 198; (14

H. in.) 200; (16 H. IIL)

202; (30 H. in.)2i4-s; (38

H. III.) 222 ; (43 H. in.)

228;. (6 E. L)24o; (7 E. L)

241 ; (IS E. L) 247

St. Paul, Ralf, 10 H. 3^ 195

Ad., Tidesweli, 31 E.

f >

I, 260

St. Paul, Wm., 5 J., 161
St. Peter, Robt. (Certif.) 337
St. Philebcrt, Thos., 16 E. I,

248-9
St. Quinton, Albreda, wo. of

Robt., ux Adam de St. Maria,

16 J., 181, 336
St. Quinton, Robt. (3 J.) 153;

(4 J.) 157; (5 J.) 160; (6 J.)

166 ; (c. J.) 307, 336, 396
Albreda Chevercourt, his

wife
St. Quinton, Thomas, 1 1 E. 2,

452
St. Quinton, Wm. (Certif.)

306
St. Remigio, Rd., 2 H. 2, 102
„ Robert, H. 2, 102

St. Romano, Artalde, 39 H. 3,

224
St. SAUVEUR, THE LORD,

VISCOUNT, 282
St. SAUVEUR, HON., 297
Sablello, Amicia, ux Galf Mus-

tiers, 6 J. , 163
Sablello, jfames, 1 1 E. 2, 456
Sacerdotes, Robert, Brother of,

2 J., 148
Sacheverel, Galf, 8 J., 172

Jo.(2j.)i62; (6 J.)

162; (9 J.) 172; (10 H. VL)

503-8
Sacheverel, Peter, 21 H. 3, 417
„ Ralf (30 E. L) 469;

(21 E. IIL) 474
Sacheverel, Robt. (i J.) 147;

(22 H. in.) 344; (7 E. L)

241
Sacheverel, William (20 E. III.)

485 ; (21 E. L) 474
Sacville, Galf (7 R. I.) 141 ; (10

R.) 145; (7 J.) 172; (13 J-)

178; (16 J.) 181; (3H. HL)
185; (8H. III.) 191; (II H.
IIL) 198; (14 H. IIL) 200;
(16 H. in.) 202; (30 H. in.)
214 bis ; (43 H. in.) 222 bis^
228; (7 E. L) 241 ; (15 E.
I.) 247

»>

t>

it

Sacville, Hy., 7 R. I, 141
Sage, Petronella le, c. H. 3, 303

William, her lirother
Sakare, Wm., 21 £.3, 480
Salceto, Wm., 6 E. i, 240

„ Robt. (28 H. II.) 128 ;
(26 H. in.) 202; (30H. HI.)
214-5 ; (38 H. IIL) 222 ; (4 \
H. IIL) 238; (7 E. I.) 241 J
(15 E. L) 245, 247
Sale, Rich, de la, Wardeston,
10 E. I, 243
Robt., his son, id.
Sale, Hugh, id.
Salfario, Nic, il J., 175
SALEBIR, SEE SELEBY,
SERLEBY, SALISBURY—
Salebir, Edmund, 355

„ Edward, 342-4, and
Aeli-s his wife
Salebir, Grace fil Thomas, 346 -
Hugh fitz Eudo, 345
Robt., 346
Roger. 345
Salic, Rob., 5 J., 159
Salicet, Robert fil Robert, 7 H.

3.189
Salicosa Mara, Galf, 129, 348

Isabella, his wife, 348
SALISBURY, SEE SALEBIR
SALISBURY, EARL, 13 J.,

177 bis
Salisbury, Edward of, 344-5

Walter, his son, id.
Salomar (Epis) 43 H. 3, 227
Sallowe, Robt., 27 E. i, 255
Salot. Robert, 13 H. 3, 196
SALVAGIUS,SEE SAVAGE—
Salvage, Edmund, 21 E. 3, 480-1
Galf (Certif.) 309 ; (T.
de N.) (4 H. IL) 103
Salvage, Havise, wo. of John,

18 E. I, 250
Savage, John (27 H. IIL)
227; (39 H. IIL) 223; (I E.
L)237; (29E. L)258; (13
H. IV.) 484 ; Clyslon (10 H.
VL) 496 ; Bradley (10 H. VL)
504
Savage, John fil Roger, Steynes-

by, 32 E. I, 261

Savage, Richard, 21 E. 3, 481 -

„ Robert, 386; (i J.) 147,

150; (2 J.) 389; (10 H. IIL)

424; (16 H. IIL) 203; (17

H. IIL) 424; (21 H. IIL)

417 ; (27 H. in.) 447 ; (35

H. IIL) 220; (21 E. IIL)

481 ; brother Galf, 309

Savage, Roger, The heirs of, 22

n. 3, 461
Savage, Wm., brother Galf, 309
Salteshola, Osbert fil Reginald,

2 J., 148
Salsari, Nicola, 3 J., 152

INDEX OF PERSONS.

557

SamL, Presb. de Blidsworth, 33

H. 2, 133
Samon, Rich., 10 H. 3, 503-6
Sanson, Hugh (31 PL I.) 97 bis ;

(22 H. 11.) 120
Sampson, Rad (17 E. I.) 249;

Parson of Eperston (ii K II.)

453
Sampson, Robert, 37 H. 3, 221

„ Thos. (14 J.) 296;

(3 H. III.) 185 ; (21 H. III.)

421
Sampson, William, 27 H. 3, 443

bis
Sandal, Tom (2 J.) 148 ; (5 J.)

161; (7 J.) 170; (14 J.) 296;

(7 H. III.) 189
Sandford, Si bell, wo. of Wm.,

44 H. 3, 229
Sandebi, Alice, wo. of Hy.

(5 J.) 158; (8 J.) '71
Sandebi, Hugh (1 J.) 147; (3

J.) 153; (5 J-) 160; (6 J.)
166

Sandebi, Jo., 25 H. 3, 211

Sandebi, Robt., 391 ; 13 H. 3,
198

Sandebi, Wm.. (22 H. II.) 120 ;
(21 H. III.) 419-21 ; (22
H. III.) 209; (25 H. III.)
210; (27 H. IH.) 436; (31
H. III.) 288; Sil)ella, his
wife, wo. of Robt. de Dane
(36 H. III.) 220

SANDIACRE SERJEANTY,
427

Sandiacre, Cecil, wo. of John, ux
Peter >de Chester, 12 £. 1,
244

Sandiacre, Galf (Harestan) (28
E. I.) 258 ; (34 E. I.) 262 ; (a
Judge) 458

Sandiacre, Henry the yr., 34
H. 3, 218-29

Sandiacre, Mathew (14 H. III.)
201 ; (16 H. III.) 203; (27
H. III.) 427-8 ; (34 H. III.)
218 bis

Sandiacre, Peter (8 H. II.) 289 ;
(4 H. II.) 104, 386-9; (1198)
305; (10 R.) 145.7; (2 J.)

• »5»; (3 J.) 153; (5 J) 160;

(13 J.) 178; (14. J) 400;

(15 J) 280; (3 km.) 183;

(27 H. III.) 427
Sandiacre, Rich fil Peter (4

H. III.) 186; (12 H. III.)

4" ; (21 n. III.) 413; (27

H. III.) 434
Sandiacre, Thomas, 44 H. 3,

227
Sandiacre, Wm. fil Peter, 34 H.

3, 218
Santon, Wm., 5)., 161
Sapcoics, Wm., II K. 2, 454

Sapton, Hamon (7 £. I.) 241 ;

(30 E. I.) 472
Sapton, Hamon fil John, 26 £.

1,254
Sapton, John, 10 H. 6, 510

„ Wm. (20 E. III.) 486;

fil Hamon (20 E. III.) 475 ;

(6 H. VI.) 486
Saracino, Thom, 43 H. 3, 217
Sardon, M., 20 H. 3, 207
Sartil, Ranulf, c H. 2, 275
Sasuualo, 43 bis \ 51
Saubadia, Peter, 21 H. 3, 417
Sauce, Robt. de la, 21 H. 3, 420
Saucer, Robt. de la (4 J.) 156;

(6 J.) 164; (13 J.) 178; (16

J.) 182 ; (3 H. III.) 185 ; (8

H. III.) 192; (13 H. III.)

199; (14 H. III.) 200
Saulf, 44
Saulon, Regl., 13 H. 3, 196

bis
Saumar, Adam, 1 1 E. 2, 452
„ Reg., 14 H. 3, 201
„ Waller, 43 H. 3, 226
Sauney, Amice, 11 E. 2, 454
Sausemaria, Galf, 16 J., 181
SAUVEYE, THE EARL OF,

21 H. HI., 412
Savell, see Sewell.
Savil, Adam, 53 H. 3, 235

Sibel, his wife
Sawiui, Robt. fil, 8 H. 2, 106
Sawer, Alan, 10 H. 6, 503
Saxendale, Malger, 6 J., 163
Saxi, Hugo, 9 J., 173
Say, Picot, c W. i, 296

„ Wm., c W. I, 296, 321
Sbeme, 65

Scacheloc, Robt., 4 H. 3, 186
Scales, Rich, 12 j., 177

„ Thos., 4 E. 2, 465 bis
Scapwick, Pagan, 330

„ Ralf fil Pagan, id,
Scardelaw, Rob, 21 H. 3, 212
Scardclive, Robt., 28 H. 3, 213
Scarlar, Robert, 21 H. 2, 118
Scarle, Robt., 18 H. 3, 205
Scyrle, Hy. fil Ralf, 28 H. 3,

212
Scarvedale, Robert fil Henry,

II E. 2, 452
Scarle, Robt. (27 E. 1.) 255 ;

(II E. XL) 452
Scatton, Philip, 14 H. 3, aoo
SCEGBY, SCEGGEBI, SEC-

COBITON—
Sceggbi, Gilbt., 318

John, 28 H. 2, 128
Ulfus (Ceriif.) 317
Walter, 318; (21 H.

II.) 117; (26 H. II.) 125
Sceggbi, Wm., 34 E. i, 262
Scelton, Rich, 391
Schepe, Wm., c 22 H, 3, 462

ti

}»

»

Schepping, Robt., 27 H. 3,

441
Schepingbotilda, Adam, 11 E.

2,453
Schirburn, Rich, 44 H. 3, 230

Schurston, Robt., 1 1 E. 2, 452

Scissor, Roger, 34 H. 3, 218

ScoDteville, John, 33 H. 3,

217

Scordis, Mathew, 19 H. 3, 206

„ Robert, id.

„ Margaret, ux Robert de

Byrton, id,

Scot, Galf (Screveton) 10 H. 3,

195
Scot, Matilde ux Robt., 9 E. I,

243
Scot, Robt., Nottm., 27 E. i,

255
Scotwich, Yarald, 31 H. 2, 131

Screveton, Ingelram, 2 J., 148

„ Robt., 27 E. I, 255

„ Robt. fil Thos, 32 E.

1,260
Scrutville, John, 37 H. 3, 221
Scrobi, Rd. (Prop.) 4 J., 154
Scroby, Wm., 16 H. 3, 201
Sedret, D,, 65

Seebohm, Frederick, his "Vil-
lage Community," 14
Segeshal, Wm. fil Galf, 46 H. 3

231
Segrave, Gilbert, 288 ; (27 H.

III.) 434-41-5
Segrave, John (30 E. I.) 470-2 ;

(20 E. in.)486; (6 H. VL).

492-3 ; grandson of John (20

E. III.) 476
Segrave, Nicholas, 22 H. 3,

462-3
Segrave, S., 14 H. 3, 201

„ Stephen (15 H. IIL)

328; (21 H. IIL) 422
John, his son
Segrave, Thomas, 10 H. 6,

498
Sekington, Robt., 10 H. 6, 504
Sel, Osmerus, 6 J., 162
Seille, Lucian (1208) 290

Agatha, his wife
Seleg, Osbert fil Lucian, 19 H.

3, 206
Selford, Prior of, 4 H. 3, 186
Seleby, Luke, 48 H. 3, 232 (see

Salebir)
Selleby, Rich (16 H. IL) ill ;

(II E. IL)452
Seledich, Nic, 1 1 E. 2, 454
Seledit, Nich, 11 E. 2, 453
Seledus, Faber, 14 J., 401
Selveston (Prior) 17 E. i, 249
Selioke, Marg., 10 H. 6, 498
Selton, Wm., 5 J., 160
Selston, Prior of, 17 E. i, 249
Wm. fil Wm., 337

,f

558

SELVEIN, SYLVAN, SAL-
VEIN E—

Sylvan, Aurens, 22 H. 3, 462
„ Osbert,94; (31 H. I.);
(22 H. IL) 120; (27H. in.)
432; (32 H. in.) 216

Silvan, Ralf, 396; (c. H. IL)

314; (3 J.) "53; (5J-) «6o;

(6 J.) 166; (12 J.) 171
Silvan, Rich, 14 J., 180

„ Wills (53 H. in.) 235 ;

(10 H. VL) 499
Scmdal, Malger, 3 Ji '53
Semplingham, Gilb. (8 H. II.)

106; (14 H. n.) no
Semplingham (Prior) (5 H. III.)

188; (27 H. in.) 430; (4£.

I.) 239
Sensin, Wm., 2 J., 149

Senese, Sampson, Newark, 35

H. 2, 136

Sepeley, Alice ux Math, 19 H.

3,206

Sepesheved, Henry fil Simon,

14 H. 3, 199

Serjeant, Henry the, 2 J., 148

„ Nich, II E. 2, 455

„ Wm., 44 H. 3, 229

Serleby, Hugo, 27 H. 3, 447

(see Seleby)

Serlo, 51, 57

„ Maria, widow of, 39 H.

3,223

Server, Hy., ii £. 2, 452

Seward (see Siward) 51

Sewell, Forester, 35 H. 3, 219

Barlburc, 5 J., 159

29 H, 2, 129

Gailor, Nottm. (5 J.)

157; (II J.) 175
Sewell, fil Hy., 31 H. I, 99

„ Henry fil (c. H. II.)

279; (c H. I.) id.
Fulcher, his brother
Sewell, John (10 H. VL) 280;

(10 H. VL) 498
Sewell, Robt., 38 H. 3, 221
„ Wm. fil Wm., 44 Ii. 3,

229
Sxelhaddon, Step., 14 H. 3, 199
Sexebi, Rich., 34 H. 2, 135
Sexteneby, Thos., 48 H. 3, 232
Seyle, Wm. (Ceriif.) 290

Ralf, his son
Seille, Lucian fil Robt. fil Luci-

an, c. J., 290
Shad worth, Wm., 28 E. I, 257
Schaddeworth, Wm. (sheriff) 20

E. I, 251 (see Chaworth)
Shaw, Hist, of Staffs., 300
Shalcross, John, 10 H. 6, 500
Shardlowe, Magr. Robt., 46 H.

3) 230
Shardlow, Robert (9 £. I.) 243 ;

(10 £. I.) 244

»i

>t

i>

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Shardlow, Thomas, 10 H.6, 506
Sharp, Wm., 11 E. 2, 452-4-5
Shatton, Robert Niger, 22 H. 2,

120
Shatton, Roger, 1 1 E. 2, 454
Shay, Ralf, 20 E. 3, 475
Shayle, Ralf, 6 H. 6, 488
Sheffil, Robt., 6 H. 6, 490
Sheladon, Rad, 10 H. 6, 499
„ Rich, 10 H. 6, 499
Shele, Hugo, 1 1 E. 2, 452
Shelford, Elias, 38 H. 3, 222

(Prior) (14 J.) 397; (5

H. in.) 187 ; (21 H. III.)

423; (27 H. in.) 436
Shelford, Peter fil Nic, 46 H. 3,

231
Shelford, Robt. (27 H. IIL)

444; (30 E. L)472
Shelford, Robt. fil Robt., 20 E.

3,475
Shilton, Roger (die.) 34 E. i,

263
Shelton, Walter, 6 J., 166

„ Wm., 3j., 154
Shene, Nich, 6 H. 6, 492
Sheining, Hy., 55 H. 3, 237

Beatrice, his wife
Shepy, Wm., 39 H. 3, 224

„ Hugo „

Shepay, Margt. wo. of John, 6

H. 6, 406
Shepay, John (20 E. III.) 486 ;

(13 H. IV.) 484; filWm. (20

E. in.) 470
Shepay, Wm., 30 E. I, 472
Sherborn, Rich (41 H. HI.)

226; (I E. L)238; (7 E. L)

241
Shereman, Mathew, 11 E. 2,

454
Schereston, Adam, 1 5 H. 2, 1 1 1

Sherland, Robt,, 53 H. 3, 235

SHIPBROOK, BARONY OF,

299
Shipley, Robert (23 H. IL) 122 ;

(44 H. IIL) 229

Filomena, his wife, id,
Shirdlowe, Magr. Robt., 43 H.

3, 228
Shireton, Hugo, 3 J., 453
SHIRLEY FAMILY, 280
Shirley, Beatrix, wo. of Hugh,

13 H. 4, 484 •
Shirley, James, 20 E. 3, 475-86
„ Ralf (sheriff) (26-31 E.

L) 254; (6 H. VL) 486;

(10 H. VL) 501-5-IO
Shirley, Robert, 6 H. 6, 492
Shore, Ralf (6 H. VL) 485 ; (10

H. VI.) 503
Shotton, Rich, 6 H. 6, 493
Showe, Hy., 5 E. I, 240
Sibtorp, Henry (53 H. IIL)

235; (6E. I.) 240

Sibtorp, John, 7 E. i, 241
„ Ralf fil Robt., 16 J.,
181
Sibtorp, Ralf, 5 J., 159
„ Rd. fil Robert
„ Robert (38 H. III.)
222; (43 H. IIL) 228; (7 E.
L) 241 ; (15 E. L) 247 ; (27
E. L)255
Sibtorp, Wm. (21 H. IIL) 415 ;

(7 J.) 171; (13 H. III.) 197
„ Wm. fil Ralf (14 H.

IIL) 200; (27 H. IIL) 447;

(30 H. in.) 214
Sibtorp, Wm. fil Robt., 16 H.

3,202
Sibtorp, Wm. fil Wm., 44 H. 3,

229
Sibtorp, Wm., Clic of Sibthorpe,

44 H. 3, 230
Sigel, Nicol de (8 H. II.) 186 ;

(31 H. II.) 131
Sigur, Wm., 1 1 E. 2, 452
Silverspon, Robt., 14 H. 3, 201
Simon, Rich, 27 H. 3, 427

„ Steph, 41 H. 3, 226
Sirewast, Wm, (Certif.) 314
Sireston, Roger fil Robert, 12

H. 3, 197
Siward (see Earl Siward) 38 bis
SIWARD, EARL, 35
Siuuard, Barn, 69
Siuuard, 37, 44, 45, 46, 47 bis, 48
Skefinton, Galfry, 31 H. 3, 287
John, 43 H. 3, 226
Skerington, John, 38 H. 3, 222
Skynne, Robt., 10 H. 6, 501
Slagge, Wm. de, Siikelhorpe,

26 E. I, 255
Slake, Wm., 28 E. I, 258
Sleigh, Adam (24 E. I.) 253 ;

(10 H. VL) 501
Sleigh, Ricus, id,
Smally, Rob., 10 H. 6, 507-8

„ -Thos., 10 H. 6, 508
Smedesbi, Wachiline, 12 H. 2,

108 (see Smithsby)
Smelf, Wm.,53 H. 3,235
Smershill, Nic, 37 H. 3, 221
Smith, Jo., Normanton, 21 £.3,

481
Smith, Nic, 10 H. 6, 506

„ Wm., Eckington, 21 £.

3,481
Smithesbi, Jordan (ii J.) 175;

(12 J.) 176
Snelland, Helto, 330
Sneinton, Rad, 35 H. 3, 22O

Walter (39 H. IIL)

224 ; (40 H. III.) 225 ; (44

H. IIL) 229
Snelleston, Hy. fil Ad., 29 E. i^

259
Snelleston, Maurice, 23 H. 2,

122

Snipston, John, 13 E. i, 245
Snotington, Adam Propos., 4

H. 3, 187 (see Sneinton)
Soc, Herbert, 5 H. 3, 188
Solers, Rich., 34 H. 2, 135
Soliston, Math., 25 H. 2,

124
Somer, Roger, 21 £. 3, 480
Somery, Hugh (Certif.) 357

„ Roger de, 48 H. 3, 232
Somerville = Sumerville
Sumerville, Alexander, 6 H. 6,

493
Sumerville, Cecelia, 14 H. 3,

201
Sumerville, Galf (3 H. III.)

185 ; (4 H. III.) 187
Sumerville, Gervase (^ H. III.)

188; (6H. m.) 189

Sumerville, Hugo, 20 E. i, 251

Matilde (5 J.) 159;

(6 J.) 163
Sumerville, Rich., Blackwell,

13 H. 3, 197
Sumerville, Robert (22 H. II.)

120; (2 J.) 149; (7 J.) 171;

(8 J.) 171; (13 J.) 179; (3

H. III.) 185; (22 H. III.)

462; (27 H. III.) 436-48;

(30 E. I.) 475
Sumerville, Roger (14 J.) 179,

310; (21 H. III.) 416-23 ;

(30 E. I.) 471
Sumerville, Walter, 289 (Certif.)

310
Sumerville, William, c. 22 H. 3,

462
Soreby, John, c. 22 H. 3, 461
Sower, Robert, 10 H. 6, 507
Sparwae, Rad, 23 E. i, 252
Spelman on the word " wainage,"

380
Spenser, To., 10 H. 6, 507
Spicer, Rich., 1 1 E. 2, 454
Spicfat, Wm. (2 J.). 149 ; (3 H.

III.) 185
Spignel, Godfrey (9 J.) 174 ; (l I

J.) 175; (17 J.) 182; (13 H.

III.) 196 ; of Skeggbi (19 H.

III.) 206 (see Sigall)
Spigoumal, John fil Edmond,

24 E. I, 253
Spileman, Rich., 46 H. 3, 231
Spink, Wm., 48 H. 3, 232
Spmehill, Michael, I £. I,

235
Spondon, Alured, 12 J., 177
Springhos, Rog., 35 H. 3, 219
Sprot, 52
Stafiword (Stafford) Barth. (4

J.) 153; (6 J.) 165
Stafford, Alice, 6 H. 0, 490

Edmund, 27 E. i, 256
Edward, Magr., 6 H.

ft

If

6,495

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Stafford, Hervy, 16 J., i8i
„ John (13 H. IV.) 484;
(6H. VI.) 493; (10 H. VI.)
498, 501-4; (Hache) (fil Rich.)
(loH. VI.) 501

Sufford, Nigel, 25, 62

,, Richard, 10 H. 6, 498
„ Robt. 310 ; (19 E. I.)
257 ; (30 E. I.) 472-5 ; (10
H. VI.) 502

Stafford, Thos., 20 E. 3, 486

Stalington, Wm. (27 H. III.)
445; (50 H. Ill) 234; (10
H. VI.) 502

STAUNFORD, STAND-
FORD, STANFEUD—

Stanfeud, Henry, 33 H. 3, 217
„ Hugo, 32 H. 3, 216
„ Magr. Nic, 43 H. 3,
227

Staunford, Peter, 27 H. 3, 437
„ Richard (5 J.) 158;

(6 J.) 167; (9 E. I.) 242;
(a Judge) 458

Staunford, Thos. (36 H. III.)
220 ; (40 H. III.) 225

Staunford, Waleran, 21 H. 2,
118

Staunford, William, 27 H. 3,

437
STANHOPE, EARLS OF, 284
Stanhope family, 284
Stanhope, Rich. (Chev.) 13 H.

4,484
STANLEY BARONY, 78
„ The Dean, 100
„ Elzth., Prioress of
Derby, 10 H. 6, 502
Stanley, Adam, 46 fl. 3, 230
Elias, ii.

Galf, IX E. 2, 452-4
John, 6 H. 6, 493
Philip, 6 E. I, 240
Nic, brother of Wm.,

384

Stanley, Robt., Sheriff of Staf-
fordshire, c. H. I, 385

Stanley, Robt. f\\ Wm. (D.) 384

Thos. (fil Wm.) (56 H.

in.) 230 ; of Duffield (10 H.

VI.) 498
Stanley, Walter (24 H. III.)

210; (27 H. III.) 429; (34

H. in.) 2x8; (II E. n.)456
Stanley, Warner, 17 H. 2, 1x3

dis
Stanley, Wm. (15 H. IL) iix ;

(5 H. in.) x88
Stanley, Wm. fil Wm., R. x, 384

„ Wm. fil Robt., 9 H. 3,

193 (see Trowell)
STANTON, STAINTON,

STAUNTON—
Stanton, Adam (H. 11.) 289,

307; (6 J.) 116

»
ft
tt
}i
tt

tt
tt

5 59

Stantorf, Alex., 46 Hr 3, 231
„ David (Certif.) 307;
15 H. 2, XII
Stanton, Elias, 13 E. i, 246
Galf, 18 E. I, 250
Godfrey fil Robt., 13
E. I, 245
Stanton, Hugo (25 H. II.) 124;

(3 J.) 153; (4J.)I56*»>,I57;

(5J-) 159-60 Ifis; (7 J.) 170;

(14 H. III.) 199
Stanton, Ingereght, 4 J., 154

„ Malger, 21 H. 3, 420

,, Matilde, wo. of Robt.,

40 H. 3, 224
Stanton, Ranulf fil Galfry, 22

H. 3. 463
Stanton, Richard (a Judge) 458

„ Robt. (13 H. in.)

1967; (22 H. in.) 209, 463;

(25 H. in.) 211; (55 H. III.)

236; (30 E. L) 470; (20 E.

in.) 486 ; (6 H. VI.) 492 ;

(10 H. VL) 510
Stanton, Robert fil Robt., 30

E. 3» 476
Stanton, Robert fil David, 23

H. 2, 122
Stanton, Robt. fil Wm. (T. de

N.)307
Stanton, Roger, 6 J., 166

„ Sarra, wo. of Hugh (7

J.) 168-9; (II J.) 175
Stanton, Thomas, 10 H. 6, 504
„ Walter (7 J.) 168-70 ;
(4^H. in.) 186; (6H. in.)
189 ; (21 H. in.) 419-22 ; (32

H. in.) 216

Stanton, William, 289, 307 ; (c.

H. IL); (7 H. in.) 189; (17

H. III.) 204; the Keve. (46

H. in.) 231 ; (21 E. in.) 480

Stannat, Hugo, 12 J., 177

Stapelford, Ad. fil Thos., 53 H.

3,234

Alice, sister of Hugh, 27 E.
1,256

Stapelford, Galf (x8 H. III.)
205 ; (21 H. in.) 416-20-3 ;
(26 H. in.) 212; (27 H. III.)
427,446; (28 H. IIL)2I3

Stapelford, Hugh, cleric, (sheriff)
(34 H. in.) 218 ; (48 H. in.)
232 ; (50 H. in.) 234 ; (53
H. in.) 234; (55 H. III.)
236; (8E.L)242; (27 E. I.)
256

Stapelford, Hugo fil Rd., 53 H.

3.235
Stapelford, John, 4 E. i, 239
„ John fil John, 24 E.

1,253
Stapelford, Rich fil Galfry, 36

H. 3, 220

Stapelford, Thomas, 1 1 E.2, 455

56o

Stapelford, Nic, 53 H. 3, 235
Rich. (41} 156; (13

If

If

J.) 178; (16 J.) 181; (8H.

III.) 191; (14 H. in.) 260;

(30 H. III.) 214; (7 E. I.)
241 ; (15 E. I.) 247
Stapelton, Nic, 13 E. I, 246
Stapenhill, John, 22 H. 3, 208
,, Robt. ill Arnal, 23

H. 3, 209
Stapuline, 32

Slartorp, Wm., 44 H. 3, 230
Statham, To., 10 H. 6, 506-8-10
Rich., 10 H. 6, 502
Thomas, 6 H. 6, 492
Wm., 10 H. 6, 510
Staveley, Philip fil Hugh, 24 E.

I, 253
Staveley, Ralf (Chev.) 13 H. 4,

484
Staveley, Simon (25 H. HI.)-

210; (31 H. III.) 215
Staveley, Waller fil Adam, 35

H. 3, 2«9
Stavensby, Henry, 9 H. 3, 193

Steinulf, 35 bis^ 36 bis^ 64, 65
Steinton, Hy., 390 (see Staun-
ton)
Steinwet, Robt., 2 J., 148
Steinweit, Roger, 3 J., 152
Stelhard, Will fil Will, 40 H. 3,

224
Stendale, Jo., 10 H. 6, 499 (see

Stemdale)
Stendale, Rich., 10 H. 6, 500
Steinreisdale, Robt., 1 1 E. 2, 454
Stephen, Magr., Ratclivc, 12 H.

3, 197
Stephen, Rich., 21 E. I, 481

Stephen the Forester, 16 H. 2,

112, 328
Sterndale, Jordan, 13 H. 3, 196
,, Robt. fil Henry, 21

E. I, 251 (see Stendale)
Sterton, Tom, 12 H. 3, 197
Steynesby, Joscelin (c. H. II.)

125; (12 E. I.) 245

Wm. (48 H. III.)

232; (9E. L)243; (10 E. I.)

243; (12 E. I.) 245
Sticleye, Rad, 20 H. 3, 207
Stirap, Dna, 21 H. 3, 400-21

„ Ingram (44 H. III.) 229 ;

(9 E. I.) 242
Stirap, Norman, 9 E. I, 242

„ Rich., 9 E. I, 242

,, Robt. fil Ran, 2 J., 148
Stirchesle, Walter (sherifi) (4 E.

I.) 238; (5 E. I.) 239, 240;

(14 E. I.) 246
Steveton (see Stivelon)

„ Hugo (4 J.) 157; (6 J.)

164-6
Steveton, Rich. (14 J.) 399* (S^i

H. III.) 235

It

»i

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Stock K Stokes

Stokes, Adam, son of Agues fil

John, 25 E. I, 254
Stock, Cnut de. 12 H. 2, 108

„ Rad, 15 J., 179 ^/j

,, Barthw., 14 J., 180

„ Galf (2 J.) 149 ; (27 H.

III.) 427; (29 H. III.) 213;

(34 H. III.) 218
Stokes, Gerebert, 2 J., 149
James, 22 H. 2, X20
John (55 H. III.) 237 ;

(5 E. I.) 240 ; (14 E. I.) 246
Stoke, John fil Joceline (46 H.

III.) 231 ; (14 E. I.) 246 ; (21

E. I.) 251
Stokes, John, brother of Matilde,

25 E. I, 254
Stoke, Launcelin (13 H. III.)

196; (14 H. III.) 199
Stokes, Matilde fil Jo., ux St.

Liz, 25 E. I, 254
Stokes, Peter (6 J.) 164; Boilston

(II E. II.) 454
Stokes, Robt. (15 H. III.) 197 ;

(21 H. m.) 420; (18 E. I.)

250
Stokes, Roger (21 H. II.) 118;

(22 H. II.) 120; (22 H. III.)

216
Stokes, Seman, 21 H. 3, 415

,, Stephen (22 H. II.) 120;

(35 H. III.) 220
Stokes, Thomas, I(\H. 6, 502 4

„ Wm. (3 H. III.) 184;

(4H. III.) 186; (I E. I.)24i
Stokelamketel, Robt., 11 £. 2,

452
Stockport, Robt., 11 J., 175

Stockport, Robt. fil Robt., c. J.,

303
Stokum, Hugo, 14 J., 196

Stocum, Margerie, 30 H. 3,

215
Stoil, Will, 35 H. 2, 136

Stopham, Robert, 24 H. 3, 210

„ Roger, 53 H. 3, 235

Store, 46, 6^

Stranley, Robt. fil Ralf, 41 H.

3, 226 (qy. Stanley)
STRELLY .- STRADLEY
Stradley, Galf, I E. I, 237
Slrelly, Hugo (10 H. III.) 195 ;

(21 H. III.) 413; (loH. VI.)

50'
Strelly, Matilde, 46 H. 3, 231

,, Matilde, wo. of Hugh,

43 H. 3, 227
Strelly, John (30 E. I.) 470;

(13 H. IV.) 484
Strelly, Philip (I J.) 146; (7 J.)

316; (2 H. III.) 407; (4

H. III.) 316; (13 H. III.)

196; (15 H. III.) 201; (20

E. HI.) 477

Strelly, Nic (43 H. HI.) 227 ;
(13 H. IV.) 484

Strelly, Philip (3 H. III.) 184;
(34 E. I.) 262

Nicola, his wife „

Strelly, Philip, 3 J., 152, and filia
A vice, his wife, id.

Strelly, Philip. 7 J., 316, and
fil Richard ntz Roger, his
wife

Strelly, Robert, (13 H. III.)
198; (14 H. III.) 200; (16
H. II.) 202; (21 H. III.)
414-6-20-3 ; (22 H. III.) with
Hebicabeli, his wife, 459 ;
(27 H. III.) 446; (10 H. VI.)
505-8 ; (30 H. HI.) 214 bis\
(31 H. III.) 288; (38 H. III.)
222; (43 H. III.) 228; (44
H. III.) 229; (7 E. I.) 241;
(15 E. I.) 247; (31 E. I.)
260; (34 E. I.) 262

Strelly, Robt. fil Robt.. (5 E. I.)
240; (13 E. I.) 246; (30
E. I.) 259

Strelly, Roger (5 E. I.) 240;
(12 E. I.) 245

Strelly, Samps. (22 H. II.) 120 ;
(24 H. II.) 123; (10 R.)

145; (2 J-) 148; (4 J) 156;

(5 J.) 159; (6 J.) 164; {J ],)

170
Strelly, Samps, fil Philip, 32 H.

3» 216
Strelly, Walter (9 J.) 173; (13

J.) 178; (14 J.) 397; (16 J.)
• 180; (3 H. III.) 184; (8 H.

III.) 191 ; heirs of Walter,

2 H. 3, 407 ; Cecilia, his

widow
Stretton, Adam (12 H. II.) 108 ;

(22 H. II.) 120
Stretton, Adam fil Rich, 55 H.

3, 236
Stretton, Hugo, 12 H. 2, 108
„ Margaret (13 H IV.)

484; (I E. I.) 237; (12 E. I.)

245
Stretton, John, 20 E. 3, 468

Nigel fil Rich fil

Walter (20 E. Ill ) 470 ; (14

(E. I.) 247

Stretton, Roger, 44 H. 3, 219

„ Thos. (9 H. III.) 193 ;

(26 H. III.) 212 ; (27 H. III.)

432-6 ; Isabella, his wife (28

H. III.) 213; (29 H. III.)

213

Stretton, Walter (15 H. II.)

Ill ; (16 J.) t8i ; (c 22 H.
III.) 462 ; (27 H. III.) 465 ;
(30 E. I.) 472
Stretton, Wm. (1202) 280

Wm. fil Hichd., 55 H.
3,237

^r^^

INDEX OF PERSONS,

561

Strete, Wm., 4 E. I, 239 (qy.

Slrutt)
Strickesley, Walter, 1 1 £. 2, 452
Stubbs, Pri)f«rssor, 102, 368
Stuffen, Alan, 48 H. 3, 233
Sturch, Wm., Tibshelf, 5 H. 3,

187
Sturesle, Robt., 7 £. I, 241
Sturey, Wm., 6 H. 6, 490
SOTVILLE, STOIEVILLE,

STUTEWELL, SIIWELL,

STUTEVILLE—
SITWELL, SIR G. R,, Bart.,

M.P., 13, 317; his descent

from the Deincourts, Pleslies,

and Rerisbys, 355
Stuteville, Henry (33 H. IL)

134; (4 J.) 155; (5 J.) .161;
(6 J.) 165; (12 J.) 176; (21
H. III.) 413
Stuteville, John (12 H. III.)
195-6,411; (13 H. III.) 198;
(14H. III.)200;(i6H. III.)
202; (21 H. III.) 417-8-9-21-
3.4; (25' H. III.) 210; (27
H. III.) 44S; (29 H. III.)
213; (30 H. ni.)2l4-S; (37
H. III.) 221 ; (38 H. III.)
222; (43 H. III.) 228; (30

E. I.) 471.5; (4 E. II.) 464-5;
' (6 E. II.) 468
Stuteville, Leonia, 173 ; (6 J.)

163; (7 J.) 170; (8 J.) 173;

(II J.) 175; (13 JO 179; (14

J-)403; (15 J-) i^ *"; (16
J.) 181-2 ; (5 H. III.) 187 ;
(8 H. IIL) 191 ; wo. of Robt.,
343 (see Rennes)
Stuteville, Nich, 30 E. I, 259
„ Robt. (22 H. III.)
460-1; 356; (44 H. III.)
229; (50 H. III.) 234; (14
E. I.) 247; (16 E. I.) 248
dis; (21 £. I.) 251-2; (22

E. I.) 455 ; (29 E. I.) 259

Stutewell, Robt. fil John (7 E.

I.) 241 ; (14 E. I.) 246; (15

E. I.) 247; (30 E. I.) 470;

Sotteville, Robt., 30 E. I, 476

Sitwell, Simon fil Walter de

Bosco, 29 E. I, 317
Stoteville, Stout {iS E. I.) 455 ;

(32 E. I.) 260
Stutevillfc, Wm., 3 J., 154
Stuthest, W., 4 E I, 238
Sudbia, Wm., 24 H. 2, 123
Sueer, Gilbert, 44 H. 3, 229 (see

Sower, Sewer)
SuUey, Ralf, 25 H. 3, 211
Sulney, Alice (1198) 388

„ Alured (31 H. II.) 131 ;
(21 H. III.) 420; (27 H. IIL)
445; (29E.L)258;(3oE.I.)
470 ; (26 E. III.) 476 ; fil
Alured (20 E. III.) 486

Sulney, Alfred, 16 E. I, 249
„ Maud, 27 H. 3, 441

Sumcote, Rad, i E. i, 238

„ Rad fil Rad, 9 H. 3,

193
Sumeter, Fulc, 33 H. 2, 134

Sumton, Arn, 34 H. 2, 134
„ Ralf, "31 H. 3, 215

Surreys, Robt. (8 J.) 171 ; (26
H. III.) 212

Susfacto, 31 H. I, 99

SUTTON SERJEANTY, 429

Sutton, Adam, 28 II. 2, 128
,, Elias, 10 E. I, 243
„ Galf fil Nic, 32 H. 3,
216

Sutton, Gerard (19 H. III.) 206 ;
(24 H. III.) 210 ; (38 H. III.)
222 ; (48 H. III. ) 232

Sutton, Gerard fil Gilbert, 18
H. 3, 205

Sutton, Hervy, 22 H. 2, 120
„ Hubert, 4 J., 154
„ Hugo fil Ed., 9 H. 3,

193
Sutton, Hugo fil John, i E. i,

238
Sutton, John, 53 H. 3, 235

„ John fil Elie, 21 £. I,

252
Sutton, Jordan fil Gerard (24 E.

I) 253; (32 E. I.) 261
Sutton, Rich (1198) 387 ; (2 J.)

150 ; i20 H. III.) 207 ; (27

H. in.) 443
Sutton, Robt. (22 H. II.) 120 ;

(31 H. II.) 131
Sutton, Silvester de, 26 H. 2,

125
Sutton, Step., 39 H. 3, 224
„ Walter, 33 H. 2, 134
„ Wm. (3 H. III.) 184;

(27 H. III.) 441; (43 H. III.)
227; (44 H. III.) 230; (46
H. IIL) 231 ; (48 H. IIL)
232
Suur, Ph., II E. 2, 452
SUWELL, SUTHWELL,

SOUTHWELL—
Suwell, Chapter of, 27 H. 3, 432
„ Magr. Rad, 55 H. 3,

236
Suthwell, John fil Augustine, 39

H. 3, 224
Suthwell, Robt. fil Walter, 31

H. 2, 131
Southwell, Thos., 4 E. 2, 315
Swain, Cilt, D. 307 ; 53 ^tf ; 54

6is
Swain, 36, 53, 54, 64 ; (34 H.

n.) 135

Swain, Adam (Certif.) 307

„ Robt. fil, 2 H. 2, 102
Swin, Robt., 9 J., 173
Suen fitz Suave, D., 69

Swallow, Robt., 10 H. 6, 501
Swalmorton, Nic, 11 £. 2, 453
Swetely, Hugh, 55 H. 3, 237
Swillington, Roger, 13 H. 4,

484
Swynborn, Dna (13 H. IV.)

484; (10 H. VL)498
Swinderby, Roger fil Wm., i E.

1,238
Swinefield, Robert, 53 H. 3,

235
Swineshead, Monks (5 J.) 161 ;

(21 H. III.) 419-22; (27 H.

in.) 439
Swineston, Jolin, 13 H. 4, 484
Robert, 6 H. 6, 493

»>

Tadington, John, 33 H. 3, 217
Taillefer, Mich, Blith, 44 H. 3,

229 (see Taliator)
Taillefer, Nich, 9 £. I, 243

„ Ralf (2 J.) 149; (5 J)

157
Tailegnant, Robt, 16 H. 3, 203

Taisson, Ralf, 386-7; (14 J.)

397; (2H. IIL) 406
Talbot, John, Sheffield, (13 H.

IV.) 484; (10 H. VL) 496-8-

9, 501-9
Talbol, Galf, c. H. 2, 276
Taliator, Hy, 23 H. 3, 209
Talveston, Alice, 6 J., 164
Taneslie, Hamon, 23 H. 2, 121
„ Orm(i2 H. IL) 352;

(22 H. IL) 121
Taneslie, Heming, 21 H. 2, 117
„ Drum, 21 H. 2, 117
„ Gode, 21 H. 2, 117
Taney, Hasculf, c. H. i, 345

„ Graelent (Certif.) 353,

345

„ Ralf, 245, 353 ; (4 J.)

„ Robert (4j.) 353, 329
Tanneip^ad, 27 E. i, 255
Wnl., his brother ,,
Tanur, WarinuB, 40 H. 3, 224

„ Wm., 16 E. I, 249
Tappeton, Ad, i J., 147
Tascur, Wm., 46 H. 3, 230
Tatersai, Johanna Dna, 4 E. 2,

465
Tatersai, Robert (10 H. III.)

194; (14 H. IIL) 201; (22

H. IIL) 459; (20 E. IIL)

^495

Taun, Ralf, Bailiff of Nottm.,

16 E. I, 249 6is
Taun, Rich, 6 H. 6, 490
Tavernor, Ralf, Nottm., 17 E. I,

250
Taillour, Adam, 21 E. 3, 480
„ Hy., Nottm. (22 H.

IIL) 208; (28 H. IIL) 212;

(31 H. III.) ,215

41

562

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Tailloure, Nic fil Marg., 31 E.

260
Taylor, John le, North Leyrton,

48 H. 3, 232
Taylor, John fil Gilbert (Bailiff of

Derby) (29 E. I.) 258 j (31

E. I.) 262
Taylor, Tom, 34 H. 3, 218
„ heirs of Thos., 27 H. 3,

428
Tavlor, Wm., Netherhaddon, 30

E. I, 259
Tayt, Thos., Ashborn, 28 E. i,

257
Tell, Jo., 34 E. I. 263

Teler, Ran (2 J.) 148; (46 H.

HI.) 231
M atilde, id,
Eva, her sister, id.
THE KNIGHT TEMPLARS,

293; (27 H. III.) 432
Tenerchebrai, Robt., 5 H. 2,

104
Teobald, Beatrix wo. of, 6 J.,

162
Theobald Monetor, 2 H. 3, 407

(uxor.)
Theobald, Richard, 40 H. 3,

224
Teodric, 49

Terry, Nic, II E. 2, 454.
Teverai, Rich, 12 J., 176
Tevery, Hugh (27 H. III.) 442 ;

(30 E. I.) 469; (30 E. III.)

474; (10 H. VI.) 506
Tevery, Wm. (2 1 E. III.) 474 ;

(6 H. VI.) 490
Textor, Walter, Birchwood, 9

H- 3, 193
Teynturer, Rc^er, Bancwel), 43

H. 3, 227

^ Cecilia, his wife, id,
Thame, Monks of, 305
Thokeston, Wm., 22 H. 3, 460
Thomas Cellarius, Worksop (9

H. III.) 193 ; (Clic.) (21 H.

III.) 412; (II E. II.) 455; of

Boilstoq (II E. II.) 452-4
Thoc, Robt., 349
Thorard, Mathw. 53 H. 3, 235
Thoreswood, Gilbert de, 2 J.,

148
Thorington, Hy., 7 E. i, 241
Thorn, Galf (17 H. Ill,) 204;

(18 H. III.) 205
Thorn, Thomas, ii E. 2, 452-5
Torna, Wm., 37 H. 3, 221
Tomeye, Alice, 34 H. 3, 219
Thorney, Lucy, 8 E. I, 242
Thornay, Peter, 50 H. 3, 234
Thomhawe, Wm., i E. I, 238
Thornhill, Ad., 43 H. 3, 227
Tomhill, Elias (ii J.) 175 ; (12

J.) 176; (28 E. I.) 258
Tornhill, Roger, 10 H. 6, 501

Thornton, Gilb., 10 E. I, 243

„ Waher, 31 E. i, 260

Torp, Gaufry fil Ralf, H. 2, 289

„ Gilbert fil Ralf, H. 2, 289

,, John fil Marg., 33 H. 3,

217
Torp, Laurence, H. 2, 289

„ Ralf, H. 2, 289.

,, Reginald, 15 H. 2, ill
Thorp, Rich fil John, 25 E. i, 254

„ Wm. (II E. II.) 454
Turp Buszard, Wm., 16 H. 3,

230
Thorwich, Robt. (6 E. I.) 240 ;

(23 E. L) 252; (28-9 E. L)

257
Thurgarton, Prior (21 H. III.)

423,432; (II E. n.)455
Thurleston, Jo. fil Thos., 10 H.

6,507
Thurleston, Peter fil Wm., 27

H. 3» 444
Tibetot, Pagan fil Robt., 30 E.

1,259
Tibetot, Robt., 356 ; (21 H.

m.)4i3; (4 ^- I.) 239; (8

E. I.) 242
Tibetot, Roger, 1 1 E. 2, 454
t ibshelf, Maurice, 25 H. 2, 124

,, Hacon, id.
TICHILL, TICKHILL,

TICKESHILL—
Tichel, John, 22 H. 2, 121
Hugo, 53 H. 3, 235
Ticheshill, Adam fil Hugh, 9

H. 3, 193

Ticheshill, Agnes, 10 H. 6, 500-7

Tickill, Robt. fil Rog., 2 J., 143

Tickenhale, Alan, 23 H. 2, 122

Ralf {yj H. IIL)

223 ; (40 H. III.) 225
Tickenhale, Stephen, 13 J., 178
„ Thomas, 13 H. 4,

484
Tickenhale, Turpin, 28 H. 2,

128
TideswcU, Hy. fil Robt. (53 H.

in.) 235; (IE. I.) 237
Tideswell, Roger, 35 H. 3, 219
„ Warner, (9 J.) 173 ;

(II J.) 175
Tideswell, Wm. (21 H. IIL)

208; (12 H. IIL) 191; (26

H. IIL) 211
Tilley, Philip (2 H. IIL) 393 ;

(21 H. IIL) 418-21
Tilley, Philippa, 27 H. 3, 438
Tiliiea, Ernald, 35 H. 2, 136

„ Rann, 12J., 177

„ Wm., his son, id.
Tilney, Wm., 38 H. 3, 221

„ Wm. fil Alured, 35 H.

2, 136
Tinctor, Roger, 9 E. I, 243

Walter, 13 H. 3, x^his

It

Tironel, WMIl, 8 J., 171
Tison, Adam, 31 H. i, 98, 99

,, Avice fil Adam, 306
Sister of Wm., id.
Tison, Jordan (4 H. II.) 104 ;

(16 H. IL) 112
Tison, Rad (31 H. I.) 99 ; (17

J.) 183
Tissington, Herbert, 2 J., 151

,, Roger, 6 H. 6, 490

Titibi, Robert (i I J.) 175 ; (12

J.) 176
Tichibi, Hugo, 27 H. 3, 434-40
Thethiby, Wm., 43 H. 3, 226
Tobbe, Thos. (27 H. IIL) 430 ;

(34 H. IIL) 219
Tochi (D.) 40, 54, 55, 66, 68, 69
Todeni, Goda ux Wachelin

Ferrars, 292
Todeni, Robert, 123 ; Bel voir

(I^-) 315, 346
TOKE, TUKE, TOCHE,

TOLKA, TULC, THOKE,

TOUKE—

Toke, Richard fil, 316

„ Arneburga fil, 31 H. 2,

131
Toche, Alex, fil (8 H. II.) 106;

(27 H. IL) 129
Tuche, Heric, 23 H. 2, 122
Tuke, Hy. (1178) 308; (6 IL

IIL) 188 ; (21 H. IIL) 418 ;

(34 H. IIL) 218; (37 H. IIL)

221 ; (48 H. IIL) 232
Tolka, Humph., 289; 12 H.

2, 108
Toke, Jordan (5 J.) 158 ; (6 J.)

162; (7 J.) 169; (II J.) 175
Tulc, Peter, (34 H. IlL) 218;

(43H. IIL)227J(I E.L)'238
Toke, Philip, 14 J., 180
Tuke, Robert (T. de N.) 307-8 ;

(7 J.) 169; (8 J.) 172; (6H.

III.) 188; (8 H. IIL) 190;

(21 H. IIL)4i8-2i-3; (27 H.

IIL) 444; (20 E. L) 251;

(6E. IL)464; (6 H. VI.) 492
Thoke, Roger, 43 H. 3, 227
Toke, Steph. (Cerlif.) 308-9;

Walter (27 H. IIL) 437;

Agatha, his wife (18 E. I.)

250; (20 E. IIL) 475-86
Touke, Waller, Henry fil ej., 34

E. I, 262
Tolka, Wm. (Cerlif.) 310; (26

H. IL) 125 bis\ (7 J.) 169;

(8 J.) 171-2; (37 H. IIL)

221 (and Alice his wife) ; (39

H. III.) 323 ; (48 H. IIL)

232
Tolf(D.)65^M
Toli (D.) 66 his, 401

„ Agnes ux Robt., 12 H. 3,

197
Topcliff, Jo., 10 H. 6, 503

INDEX OF PERSONS.

563

11

»»

»»

Torchard, Galf (13 H. IL) 109;

(14 H. II.) 109
Torchard, John ( i $ H. III.) 201 ;

(21 H. III.) 417-24; (27 H.

III.) 443-6
Torchard, Rad (12 H. II.) 108;

(5 £. I.) 240
Torchard, Robt., 14 H. 3, 411
Rich, 21 H. 3, 420
Walter, 12 H. 2, 108
Wm., 351 ; (16 H.

III.) 205; (32 H. III.) 221;

(II £. II.) 452
Torchard, Wm. fil Galfry, 31

E. I, 260
Tori (D.) 42

Tornes, Wm., 20 E. 3, 493
Torpington, Gilbert, 21 H. 2,

117
Totteshall, Hy., Propos., 16 H.

3, 203
Tottington, John fil Rich, 24

E. I, 253

Totenhal, Robt., 43 H. 3, 228

Ti)veton, Henry, 13 H. 3, 199
,, Johanna fil Henry, 11
E. 2, 452
Toulouse, Peter, 1 1 E. 2, 454
Travis, Hugh, Alicton, 48 H.

3,232
Tregos, Galfry, 27 H. 3, 432

„ Robt., Bilderstorp, 44

H. 3. 229
Trehampton, Ralf, 33 E. i, 261
Trekenham, Wm., 34 H. 3,

218
Trekington, Lambert, 28 E. i,

258
Treleg, Robt., 18 H. 3, 205
Trengeston, Alan, 53 H. 3, 235
Trenkeston, Alan, 14 E. I,

Elena, his wife ,,
Treton, Alan fil John, 53 H. 3,

235
Alice, his wife ,,

Trou, Laurence, 4 H. 3, 187

„ Wm., 16 J., 180

,, Laurence, id.
TROWEl.L (SEE STANLEY)
Trowell, Barnabas 14 J., 179
„ Galf (6 J.) 164 ; (14 J.)

397; (3H. IIL)393
Trowell, John fil Richard, 4 £.

1,238
Trowell, Johanna, wo. of Wm.,

14 E. I, 247
Trowell, Marsill (27 H. IIL)

430; (34 H. IIL) 219
Trowell, Nic. (12 H. IL) 108;

(13 H. IL) 109
Trowell, Osbert, I J., 146

. ,. Rioli. (I J.) 146, 384;

(5 J) '61 ; (7 J.) 170; (21 H.

IIL) 42] ; (48 H. IIL) 232

Trowell, Robert, i J., 146

Wm. (21 H. IIL) 417-

24 ; (27 H. IIL) 446 ; (55 H.

III.) 237 (see Trussel)
Truelove, Wm., 7 E. i, 241
Trunchal, Abb., 12 J., 176
Trunchet, Wm., 36 H. 3, 220
Trusbot, John (21 E. L) 481 ;

(13 H. IV.) 484
Truslcy, Hy., 34 H. 2, 135
„ Robert (23 H. IL)

122; (12 E. I.) 245
Trusley, Wm. (Certif.) 306

Robert, his son, id,
Trussell, Alisie, 15 H. 2, ill
Trusselles, Wm. fil Ralf (46 H.

IIL) 231 ; (14 E. I.) 247
Trutt, Glib., 10 H. 3, 195
Tuchet, Hy. (12 H. IL) 108;

(13 H. IIL) 176; (21 H.III.)

418
Tuchet, John, 13 H. 4, 484
,, Robert, 27 H. 3, 446
„ Tom (10 H. IIL) 194;

(30 E. I.) 469 ; senior (20 E.

IIL) 474 bis, 485
Tuchet, Wm., 36 H. 3, 220
Tummoner, Jo.. Walton,* 20 E.

3, 476 (c|y. Summoner)
Tunland, Thos., 11 E. 2, 45 3
Punstedes, Hy., 28 E. I, 258
Turbelville, John (Certif.) 305
Turgar (I).) 60 bis
Turgarlon, Roger fil W.m., 32

H. 3, 210
Turgis (D.) 42
Turke, Roger, 44 H. 3, 236
Turkil -^ Thurkill, TherkiU
Therkill, John, 6 H. 6, 493
Turkelbi, Roi^er, 33 H. 3, 217
Turmingtorp, Robt., 43 IL 3,

227
Turnton, Alured, 2 J., 149
Tumham, Step., i J., 146
Turinton, Wimar, 34 H. 2,

134
TURLAVESTON, THORLA-

VES TON, THU RSTON,

THORLASTON, TUR-

NLRVESTON, TURAL-

VESTON—

Turlaveston, Ralf fil Thos., 10

H. 3, 195
Thorlaveslon, Robt. fil Hugh,

4 E. I, 239
Thorleston, Robt. 61 Robt, 14

E. I, 241
Turlaveston, Serlo (13 H. IL)

109 ; (28 H. II.) 128-9
Turn erdes ton, Uctred, 34 H. 2,

135
Turold (Chcvercouri) D. 336

Turri, Rich., 4 H. 3, 187

,, Simon, Ro -csion, 33 H.

2, 134

If

>f

Turston, Clic. of Southwell, 32

H. 2, 133
Turston de Sudwell, 16 H. 2,

112
i urtey, Maur (Certif.) 310
TUTBURY FEODARY, 489
Tutbury, Emma, 10 H. 6, 508
Tutebirst, Nic, 27 H. 3, 445
TUXFORD, THE LADY

OLIVIA, 335
Tuyt, Robt., 24 H. 3, 210
TWISS, SIR TRAVERS (his

Edition of Bracton) 380
Twyford, Jordan fil Alan, 348
jo., 20 E. 3, 475-85
Rad, 6 H. 6, 490
Robt. (6H. VL)485-

90 ; (10 H. VI.) 506-8-10
Tykehall, Ralf, 22 H. 3. 208
Tym worth, Hy., 6 H. 6, 492
Tyresholt, Rog., 14 £. i, 247

Ube (O.) 43

Uctred (D.) 36, 37, 64

Uffeton, Hy. (46 H. IIL) 231 ;

(31 E. L) 481 ; ,
Isabella, his wife, id,
Ufton, Walter (1252) 351 bis\

fil Wm. (29 E. L) 258
Ulchel (D.) 37,41 /ii>, 44 ^/ J, 49,

62
Ulchetel (D.) 41, 43
Ule, Gilbert, 22 H. 2, 121
Ulecole, Engram, 14 H. 3, 199

,, Ingelram, 31 E. I, 260
„ Philip, 391 bis\ (2 J.)

148.56; (4j.)i56Wj; (5 J.)

159,160; (6 J.) 164; (9 J.)

173-4; (13 J-) >78; (16 J.)
i8i^i>;(i3H. IIL) 198; (14
H. IIL 200; (15 H. IIL)
202 ; (30 H. IIL) 214 ; (38
H. IIL) 222; (7 E. L) 241;
(9E. L)242; (15 E, L)247;
(23 E. I.) 252; heirs of (11
E. IL) 451

Ulecote, Robert, 5 J., 157
„ Robt. fil, 2 J., 148

Ulestan (D.) 48

Ulf (O.) 43, 48 ; (de Marnham)
317 (qy. ancestor of Mat hew
de Hathersage)

Ulf, Fenisc (qy. the elder, Senex)
D. 318; 61, 62, 69 bis

Ulfar (D.) 63

Ulfstan (D.) 49

Ulgarfhorpe, Wm., lO H. 6, 496
bis

Ulkerlhorpe, Peter, 349 ^w

Wm., 13 H. 4,

483
Ulmer (D.) 40, 42
UlricCilt(D.)69

tm^a

• M«M

Ulsi (D.) 43 Hs, 44, 48, 49, 51,

64-6
Uluiet (O.) 37, 41 dt's, 42, 48, 51
Uluric (D.) 40 dis, 41, 53
Unban (D.)42
Undai, Robt., 12 H. 2, 108
Underthorp, Nic, 48 H. 3, 232
Unfredus, the Fisherman of

Nottingham, 14 H. 3, 216
Upcotes, Roger, 11 £. 2, 453
Uppeton, Alan, 29 H. 2, 129
Upton, Henry, 33 H. 2, 134

„ Hugo (Cap.) 13 ii. I,

245
Upton, Wm., 5 E. I, 240

Urcellus, a Jew. 34 H. 3, 217

Ursel, Regl., 27 H. 3, 440

„ Rich, 13 H. 2, 109, 328 ;

(Certif.) 337
Ursel, Robt., 1 1 H. 2, 337
Urtona, Fulcher, 349
Uvetorp, Gervase, 21 H. 3, 421
„ Wm. fil Reg]., 12 II.

3, 197
Galf, his brother, id.

Vacarius, Magister, 31 H. 2, 131
Vache, Rich, 21 E. 3, 479
Vadis, Peter (9 J.) 173; (8 H.

HI.) 192; (13 H. HI.) 198;

(14H. HI.)20o;(i6H. HI.)

202 ; (30 H. HI.) 214
Vadis, Rol>ert, 23 H. 2, 121, 122
Valdari, Wm. de, 7 H. 2, 105
Valle, Gilbert, 28 H. 2, 128
Vallibus Roger (18 E. I.) 250 ;;

(21 E. I.) 252
Vasetin, Hugo de, 26 H. 2, 120
Vavasor, l.lizafii Wm., 53 H. 3,

235
Annora fil Wm., /</.

Vavasor, John, 17 E. i, 249

„ Robt., 349, 356; (10

R. I.) 145; (3J-) »54; (4 J.)
IS5-6; (5 J-) 160; (20 H.

HI.) 207; (21 H. III.) 416-
235(22 H. III.) 208; (27 H.
HI.) 427.34-41-7; (29 H. HI.)
214 ; slieriff (31 H. III.) 215 ;
(34H. III.)2i3;(39H. HI.)
223 ; (40 H. HI.) 224
Vavasor, Wm. (32 H. II.) 134 ;
(II J.) 174 ; (25 H. HI) 210;
(38 H. HI.) 221 ; (39H.III.)
223 ; (44 H. HI.) 229 ; (46
H. HI.) 231
Vctebrand (D.) 32
Veer, Simon, 28 H. 3, 243
Venator, Robt., 9 J., 173
„ Thos., H. 2, 289
Will, 13 H. 3, 196
Venelle Alan, 35 H. 3, 220
»> Jt>hn, 5 E. I, 240

II

})

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Venel, John, Flenberg, 12 E. i,

245
Venis, Rog., Presb., 25 H. 2,

124

Venur, Wm., 44 H. 3, 229

Ver, Walter, 14 J., 180

„ Wm. de, 31 H. 2, 131

Verd, R<»bert, 12 H. 3, 197

Verdistan, Step, fil John, 39 H.

, 3, 223
Verdun, EUas, 20 E. 3, 476-7

„ Henry (32 H. III.) 216;

(13 E. I.) 245

Verdun, Nic (c. 22 H. III.) 463 ;

(30 E. I.) 470-6

Verdun, Rohes, 28 H. 3, 213

„ Roger, 27 H. 3, 212

„ Theobald (c.22 H. HI.)

463 ; (6 H. VI.) 492 ; heire of

Verdun, William, 2 H. 3, 410

Vergil, Polidore, 13

VERNON, THE LORDS, 284

„ Emma fil Com. Devon,

ux Wm. A venel, 297

Vernon, Henry, 6 H. 6, 493

SIR JOHN, H. 8, 284

Matilde, 20 E. 3, 477

Rich.(R. I.) 294; (I J.)

146; Amicia, his wife (3 J.)

295; (3 JO 153; (4 J.) 156;
and Alice, his wife (5 J.) 158 ;
(6 J.) 164; (7 J.) 170; (16
J) 181; (27 H. HI.) 444;
(35H. Hl)2i9;(39H. HI.)
224; (30 E. I.) 470-2-7; (!'
E. II.) 454; (20 E. HI.) fil
Rich, 477 ; (6 H. VI.) 490.5;
(loH. VI.)499, 507

Vernon, Rich, Pichecote, 4 E.
I, 239

Vernon, Rich., Haddon, 299 ;
(1252) (7 R. I.) 301; (29 H.
HI.) 301 ; fil William (f 27
H. HI.) (t 16 E. II.) 302; (8
E. II.) 303

Vemon, Robt., t H. 3, 302
,, Walcheline, fil Walter
300

Vemon, Walter, of Harlaston,
299 (an apocryphal personage)

Vernon, W^m. (D.) 299, 300 ; (3
H. HI.) 185 dis ; (8 H. HI.)
191 ; (13 H. HI.) 198; (21
H. HI.) 413; 36 H. HI.) 220

Vernon, Wm., Justice of Chester,

299
Vernon, Wm., Otelin, 297

Vesci, Eustace, 391 ; (2 J.) 43 ;

(4 J.) 156

Veteriponte, Robt., 4 J., 156

Vienna, Hugo, 26 K. i, 255

Villani, Rich., 31 H. 2, 131

Vivarius, John, 17 J., 182

Vilers — Vylers

Vylers, Alexr., 33 H. 3, 217

Vylers, John (27 H. III.) 434-
40; (33 H. HI.) 217 ; (40 H.
III.) 224; (43H. HI.) 226;
(4E. I.) 239; (18 E. I.) 250
Vylers, Isolde (14 H. III.) 201 ;
(43 H. HI.) 227
Sibel, her sister, id.
Vylers, Pagan, 21 H. 3, 419-21
,, Ralf, 21 H. 3, 421
„ Robt., (3 J.) 152, and
Johanna, id, ; (10 H. HI.)
195 ; (46 H. III.) 231
Vylers, Roger, 15 H. 3, 201

„ William, 21 H. 3, 418
Vintner, Ban, 2 J., 148
Vipont, Ydonia, 18 H. 3, 205
„ John (2 H. HI.) 3935

(27 H. HI.) 443
Vipont, Robt., 131 ; (i J.) 146;

(3 J.) 252; (5 J.) 160; (6 J.)

162, 166-7; (9 J.) 172; (3H.

III.) 183 (see Veteriponte)
Vlsi (D.) 59
Vou, RoUt. (4 E. I.) 239; (6 E.

I.) 240; (15 E. I.) 248
Vuerdon, Tom, 2 J., 148

Wace, Alice fil Wm., 8 J., 171

(see Wake)
Wade (D.) 53
Wade, Robt., 41 H. 3, 226
Wadsleich, Rad, 12 £. i, 245
Waddesley, Robt. (i E. I.)

238; (31 E. I.) 260; (II E.

11)452
Wadeland, Rad, 313, 358

WAKE, THE HONOUR OF,

446
Wake, Baldwyn (46 H. III.)

230; (4 E. I.) 239; (18 E. I.)

250; (26 E. I.) 255
Wake, Hugo (17 H. II.) 113

dis; (17 H. HI.) 204; (21

H. HI.) 417 ; (23 H. HI.)

209 ; (26 H. II.) 211
Wake, John fil Bald. (c. 22 H.

HI.) 461 ; (28, 29E. I.) 257
Wake, Johanna, widow of Hugh,

27 H. 3, 446 bis
Wake, Nich (c. 22 H. III.) 461 ;

(4 E. II.) 239
Wake, Thos. (30 E. 1.) 471 ;

(4E. II.) 464; (20 E. III.)

476
Wakebrigg, Nic (41 H. HI.)

226; (I E. I.) 237; (17 E. I.)

249
Wakebrigg, Peter, 339

Ralf (1252)351

Wal, Nich, 13 E. i, 245

Isabella, his wife ,,

Walchel, Wm. fil (2 J.) 148;

(2 J.) 153

INDEX OF PERSONS.

56s

Waldescheir, Walter ^30 E. I.)

472-S ; (20 E. III.) 488
Walesdie, Juliana, 11 E. 2, 452
Walens, Rich (21 H. II.) 118;

(3 H. III.) 185 (see Wenhun-

wyn)
Walens, Robt., 10 H. 3, 195
Walys, Thos., 10 H. 6, 506
Walesby, Hy. fil Wm., 34 E. i,

262
Waleswod, Wm., 34 E. i» 262
WALICHVILLE BARONY,

358
Walichville, Kalf fil Wm, 326

(see Watville)

Walker, John, 6 H. 6, 493

Walkingham, Wm., 53 H. 3,

235
Walkeringham, Jo., 392

Walkley. Hy., 27 H. 3, 437

WaHef(D.)45

Walleia, Robt., 7 H. 3, 189

Wallegh, Hy., 10 H. 3, 195
„ Rich, 10 H. 6, 505
„ Robt. fil Robt., 3 H.

3,185
Walmer, 31 H. 2, 132

Walmisgow, Thos., c. 23 H. 3,

463
Walrington, Tom, 4 J., 157

WALTER, BISHOP OF CO-
VENTRY. 350 (4 E. II.)
465; (II E. II.) 455

Walter, Cleric of Nottingham,
33 H. 2, 134

Walter (Forester de Newton) 12

H. 3> "97
Walter, Theobald, 2 II. 3, 410
„ Roger (sheriff) 13 H. 2,

109
Waltham, Simon, 2 H. 3, 408
Walthou, Rich, 40 H . 3, 224
Walton, Gervase de, 29 H. 2,

129
Walton, Margt. , widow of Rich,

I E. I, 238
Walton, Robt. (21 H. III.) 415 ;

(I E. I.) 237
Walton, Robt. fil Robt. (1229-

47) 350.

Cecilia Derby, his wife, id.

Walton, Magr. S., 46 H. 3, 231
Walurich, Hy, 35 H. 3, 220
WANDESLEY,WODENSLY,

WEDNESLY—
Wandesley, Alexr. (12 H. III.)
411 ; (22 H. III.) 209; (27
H. in.) 430; (31 H. III.)
215; (32 H. III.) 216; (34
H. III.) 219; (38 H. III.)
282

Agatha, his mother, 209
Wandtsley, Galf, 351

,, Hereward, 25 H. 2,

124

Wandesley, Margaret, wo. of
Roger, (28 E. 1.) 257 ; (11 E.

n.) 454
Wandesley, Nic, brother of Ralf,

14 H. 3, 355
Wandesley, Orm, 12 H. 2, 108,

335
Wandesley, Ranulf (43 H. III.)

227 ; (4 E. I.) 239 ; fil Ralf
(4 H. III.) 355 ; {14 H- "I)

355
Wandesley, Robert (22 H. II.)

120; (43 H. UI.) Z2T bis

Wandesley, Roger, 7 E. i, 241,

351
Wandesley, Wm. (22 H. II.)

335 ; (7 E. I.) 241
Waneton, Wineman, 12 H. 2,

108
Wapenbrok, Beatrice, wo. of

Robert, 43 H. 3, 226
Wapeton, Alan, 28 H. 2, 128
Ward, Hy. 15

„ John (6 E II.) 468;

(10 H. VI.) 510
Ward, Robt. de la (c. 22 H. III.)

463 ; (30 E. I.) 470-6 ; (34 E.

I. ) 262
Ward, Wm., 21 E. 3,480
Wardlowe, Wm. fil Hugh, ii

E. 2, 453
Warewill, Mathew, 27 E. i, 255
Warin, Wm:,*i8 H. 2, 115 bis
Warin, of Newark, 13 J., 178
Warner (D.) 52 bis
WARREN, THE EARL (8 H.

III.) 191-2 ; (21 H. III.)

4x3 ; (9 E. I.) 242
Warrington, John, 27 E. i, 255
Warsop~, Rad, 26 H. 2, 225
Warth, Robt., 35 H. 3, 219
WARWICK. DROGO FIL

WM., EARL, 329
WARWICK, HUGO, brother

of the Enrl, id.
WARWICK, HUGO, son- of

the Earl, id,
WASCELIN, WACHELIN—
Wascelin, John, 25 H. 3, 211
Wacbilene the M inter, 5 H. 2,

104
Wascelin, John, Carlton in Lin-

dric, 16 H. 3, 20X
Wascelin, Robt. (53 H. IH.)

235 ^" ; (4 E- I.) 239

Wascelin, Roger „

Wasf, Alexr., 36 I^ 3, 220
Watkins, John, 15
Watcley, John, 10 E. i, 243
Watenliou, Hugh, 21 H. 3, 420
„ Rol>l. (21 H. IIL)

414; (41 H. in.) 226
Walenhou, Roger (21 H. III.)

416; (21 H. III.) 422; (27

H. in.) 446

>f

Walenhou, Step. (34 H. IIL)
217; (39 H. IIL) 223

Waters, Mr. Chester, Lines.
Roll, 323, 345 ; upon Edward
of Salisbury, 344

Waterville, Maud fil Geofirey,

305

Ascelina Peverel, wife of
Geoffry, id.
Watlega, Martin, 31 H. i, 96-9
Wattelun, Thos., 20 E. 3, 475
Wathesham, Osbert, 2 H. 3,

140
Watton, Wm., 27 H. 3, 430
Dna Alina, 5 J., 161
Robt., 16 J., 180
Walter, 27 E, I, 255
Wauncey, Robt., 10 E. i, 243
Wauton, John fil John, 53 H. 3,

235
Wayfer, Alexr., 39 H. 3, 224

Webster, Hy., 21 E. 3, 479

Weddon (see Heddon) 155

Wedon, 12 H. 2, 108

Wedington, Andrew, 31 H. 3,
215

Welbec, Abbot (14 J.) .400;
Canon (2 H. HI.) 403; (12
H. IIL) 411; (22 H. IIL)
461 ; Wm., Prior (27 H. III.)

432-7-8; (9 E. 1.) 243; (II

E. IL)456; (21E. IIL)48o;

Ri<:hard (10 H. VL) 508
Welbec, Roger, 12 J., 176
Wellebeuf = Oil de Beuf
Wellebeuf, Galfry ((21 H. HI.)

417-24; (43 H. nL)227
Wellebouf, Hy., 23 H. 2, 121
Wellbeof, Oliver (3 J.) 155 ; (4

J.) 153; (5 J-) 156; (6 J.)

164; (14 J.) 401
Wellbeof, Ralf (18 H. IL) 113

bis'y (2 J.) 148
Wellbeof, Wm., 14 H. 3, 199
Wellhawe, Henry, 11 E. 2, 452
„ Thomas, 10 H. 6, 508
Wellum, John, 40 H. 3, 224
„ Thos. (25 H. IIL) 210;

(39 H. IIL) 223
Sarra, his wife, id.
Wellum, Thos. fil Jacob, 28 II.

3» 213
Wellum, Will, 12 H. 2, 108
Welley, Jordan, 20 E. i, 251

„ 'Will fil Thos. fil Rob.,

40 H. 3, 224
Wellwyk, Ralf (30 E. I.) 470 ;

(21 E. III.) 480
Welton, Rad, 12 H. 3, 197
WENUWIN, 17 J.. 183 (see

Walens)
Wenuwyn, Giiffin fil, 25 H. 3,

210
Wenuwyn, Margt., widow of,

12 H. 3, 197

566

INDEX OF PERSONS.

Wenuwyn, Walens (2 J.) 143;
(2 H. III.) 393-4; (21 H.

in.) 413

Wercer, Philip, 27 H. 2, 128
Weremond, Rc^er fil Half, 34

H. 2, 135
Werington, Tom, 2 J., 148
Weimundes worth, Hugo, 9 H.

3» 193 *^
Wermundesworth, Nic (34 H.

III.) 218; (39 H. III.) 223.4
Wermundesworth, Martin (30

E. I.) 469; (20 £. III.) 474
Wermington, VVm., 48 II. 3, 232

bis
Wessington, Ralf fil Simon, 349 ;

Mabilia, his wife (27 H. III.)

(1252) 391 J fil Kalf (27 11.

III.) 349-50;. (1252) 351-2;

Matilde, his wife
Wessington, Simon fil Rich, 369
West, Robt., 10 H. 6, 502

„ Tom fil Turald, 34 H. 2,

'35
Westbury, Henry (CerUf.) 315

„ Roger (Certif.) 315

„ Wm. (Certif.) 318

WESTMORLAND, RALF,

THE EARL, 10 H. 6, 498

Weston, Hugo, 12 H. 3, 197

„ Mich., 41 H. 3, 226

„ Ran (22 H. IIL) 208;

(II E. \l )452

Weston, Rich. (35 H. HI.) 220 ;

(43H.III.)227;(i2E.L)245
Weston. Rich, fil Wm., 46 H.

3} 231
Weston, Robert, 46 H. 3, 230
„ Tom(8T.) 171 ; ("J.)

175; (3 H. III.) 183; the

Falconer (4 H. III.) 186
Weston, Wm. de (26 H. IL)

125 ; (46 H. III.) 230
Weston, Wm. fil Hugh, 48 H.

3,232
Westorp, John, 34 H. 2, 135

„ Hugo, id.
VVestrensis, Wm., 2 J , 149
Westwick, John, 20 E. 3, 476
Ralf, 36 E. 1,475
Westwof»d, Wm., 11 E. 2, 454
Wetecroft, Robt,. 5 H. 3, 188
Weteley, Simon fil El, 50 H. 3,

233
Weytigton (see Witinton)
Whaplode, Thos., 43 H. 3, 227
„ John, 10 I!. 6, 499

Whiston, Rich., 10 H. 6. 501
White, Robt. fil Waller, Coling-

ham, 29 E. i, 258

Simon, his brother ,,
Whitefield, Robt.. 13 H. 3, 196
Whiiford, Nic, 35 U. 3, 220
Whilelai, Hilde. 2J., 148
Wibieton, Ralf fil Ralf, 329

Wichford, Robert, 43 H. 3, 227
„ Roger, 40 H. 3, 224
Wichenor, Wm., 9 H. 3, 193
Wicheton, Robert, 26 11. 2, 126

„ Henry „

Wictric(D.)37

Wydeford, Nigel, 27 H. 3, 440
Widmerpol, Nich., 14 E. I, 247
Wiggeley, Hy., 46 H. 3, 231
„ Wm., 34 E. I, 262
Wigot, of Lincoln, 23 H. 2, 123
Wiltlon, Rog., 46 H. 3, 231
Wilde, Wm. (5 J.) 157 ; (6 J.)

161
Wylde, John, 10 H. 6, -501
Wildeker, Walter, 21 H. 3, 421
Wildgos, Robt., 55 H. 3. 237

,, Win,, 4 E. I, 238

Wilford (see Clifton)

„ Gervase (sheriff) (9 E.

L) 243; (10 E. L)243; (12

E. I.) 244
Wilford, Rad, Nottingham, 5

E. I, 240
Wilfroiit, Thos. fil Thos., 10 H.

3. 195
Wilington, Alice, 5 E. i, 240

Wilinton, Nic. i8 J.) 171 ; (5

H. in.) 188; (7H. IH.)i89;

(10 H. IIL) 194
Wille, Wiles, 28 H. 2, 128
Wills, Galf, 8 R. 1, 367

„ Roger, 6 J., 167
William (D.) 49

„ brother of King Henry

II., 5 H. 2, 104-5-6 bis
Willian), Magr., Arch. Derby,

32 H. 3, 216
William Propositus, of Derling-

ton, II E. 2, 452
William (Cap.) H. 2. 289

„ Presb., Flintham, 31 II.

2, 131

William, Custos Church of

Hrimington, 27 E. i, 2^5
William, Thos. fil, 10 H. 6, 500
,, gen., Presb., 8 J., 171
,, Nepos, Cap., Newark,
17 H. 3, 204
William, Propositus, 8 J., 171
Williamscole, Thos., 43 H.3, 227
Willeton, Thos., and Ramett.i,

his wife, 10 R., 145
Wilne, Robt., 48 H. 3, 232
„ Wm. fil John, 31 H. 3,
215 (see Wylne)
Wilneton, Philip, 8 J., 172
Wilington, Simon, 34 H. 2, 135
Wilton, Nic, 12 J., 176
„ Philip, I J., 146
„ William, 39 H. 3, 223
Wimpton, Roger fil Wm., 4 E.

I, 239
Wimpton, Wm., 12 E. i, 245

Wimund, 21 H. 2, 117

WincheMWr, M., wo. of, 13 J.,

179
Windekers, Hugh, 3 J., 152

Wineshill, Phil, 14 J., 180

Winesley, Wm. fil Ad,, 27 E. i,

Win

255
infield,

»»

Arnold, 10 H. 3, 196
Catherine fil Rad, 35
H. 3. 220
Winfield, Hugh, f J., 146
„ Ralf, 352

,. Richard fil Nigel (11

E. II.) 452; Richard, his
brother
Winfield, Robert (37 H. IIL)

221 ; (41 H. III.) 226
Winfield, Robert fil Ralf (36 H.
IIL) 220; (48 H. IIL) 232;

(13 IL IIL) 349
Winfield, R(^er, 20 E. 3. 490

Wingerworth, Roger, 10 H. 6,496

Winton, Alan, 55 H. 3, 236

Wint, Wm. de (26 H. IL) 126 ;

(32 H. II.) 132
Wiote, 21 H. 2, 117
Wirke, Hugo, i J., 146

„ Roger, id.
Wirksop = Worksop
Worksop, Hugh, 17 E. I, 249
„ Robt. fil John, 34 E.

1, 262

Worksop, Wm. de, 2 J., 148

., Thos., 2 J., 148
Wirksworth, Prior of, 5 J., 150
VVischard, Robt., 16 H. 3. 203
Wishou, Rich, 4 H. 3, 187
Wistaiius, Prior of Repcndon,

10 H. 6, 502
Withand, Robert, 26 H. 2, 126
Witing, Matilde fil Wm., 40 H.

3,225
Wilenhale, Adam, 27 E. i, 255
Witington, Alan (14 H. IIL)

199; (15 H. III.) 201
Witington, Henry, 29 E. i, 258
„ John fil Robert, id.

„ Robert (24 H. II.)

123; (25 E. L)254; (10 H.

VL)503
\\ itington, Simon, 44 H. 3, 230

„ Thom, 6 H. 6, 493

Wivelsthorpe, Leofwin, 22 H.

2, 120

WIVERTON FAMILY (sbb

BASSETT)
Wiverion, Alice fil Rich, 39 H.

3, 223

Wiverton, Alina fil Rich, id.
„ Gervase (4 J.) 155-6;

(5 J-) '59 *"; (6 J.) 165;
(13 J.) 178; (16 J.) 181; (2
H. III.) and Sarra, his wife,
346, 407; (8 H. IIL) 191 ;
(13 H. HL) 197; (14 H.
IIL) 200

/

INDEX OF PERSONS.

567

Wverton, Gervase fil Richard,

3 H. 3, 184
Wiverton, Idonca, 37 H. 3, 221
Rich, (15 J.) 247;

(12 H. III.) 411; (13 H.

III.) 196 ^., 197 ; (16 H.

III.) 202; (17 H. III.) 204;

(21 H. III.) 416-9-23; (27

H. III.) 446; (38 H. III.)

262; (43 H. III.) 228; (7

E. I.) 241 ; (10 E. I.) 244
Wiverton, Rich fil Gervase, 27

E. I, 255
Wiverton, Roger, 30 H. 3, 214
„ Sarra, 21 H. 3, 412
„ Wm. (17 H. III.)

204 ; 27 H. III.) 439
Wodi (D.) 44
Wood, Ralf (Pleasley) 21 E.

3,480
Wood, Robt. alte (Whitwell),

29 E. I, 258
Woodburc, Galfr, i J., 146
Woodburgh, Henry fil Ralf (21

H. III.) 415; (28 E. I.) 257
Woodburgh, Ralf (21 H. III.)

420; (27 H. III.) 446; (10

E. I.) 243 ; fil Herbert (ii E.

n.) 453
Woodburgh, Robt., 20 H. 2, 120
Will, 21 H. 3,
416-23
Woodhead, Ralf, 11 £. 2, 452
„ Roger fil Robt., 6

H. 6, 493
Wudhouse, Adam, 13 H. 3, 197
Helias, 16 H. 2, 1 12
John, 16 H. 2, 112
Matthew, 16 H. 2,

,»

»>

112

Wodehouse, Petronella (39 H.

III.) 224 ; (40 H. III.) 224 ;

(41 H. III.) 226
Wodrove, Richard, 10 H. 6, 301
Wodrove, Roger fil Roger, (34

E. I, 262
Wodrove, Simon, 46 H. 3, 231
Wolferslon, S. P., 300
WMangton, Thos. (1198) 391
Wollaveston, Wm., 33 H. 3,

217
Wollaton, John, 10 H. 6, joS
. ,, Thos., 10 H. 6, 491
Wm., 13 H. 4, 484
Wolley, Roijer (6 H. VI.) 486 ;

(10 H. VI.) 504
Wolrington, Robt., 6 E. I, 240
Wulrington, Robert (13 H. III.)

199; (21 H. III.) 421 ; (27

H. III.) 436
W*lrlngton, Tom, 5 J., 160
Wombwell, Thos., 10 H. 6, 501
Worksop, Prior of (21 H. III.)

423; (27 H. III.) 432
Worm le Robt., 5 H. 3, 187

Wormenhill, Alan (13 E. I.)

246 ; (34 E. I.) 262
Wormhill, Laurence (12 J.) 177 ;

(15 J.) 180
Wormhill, Robt., the Miller of,

31 H, 2, 131
Wormhill, Roger, Snitterton, 10

H. 6, 500
Worth, Roger fil Jord, 19 H. 3,

206
Worthy, Thos., 31 E. 3, 486
Wragby, Robt., 46 H. 3, 231
Wright, Edward, 10 H. 6, 500

„ Thos., 10 H. 6, 510

„ Wm., 21 E. 3, 479
Wrottesley,"Major-Genl., 15, 24,

92, 93i 291, 300-1, 388
Wudham, Hugh, 34 H. 2, 135
„ Peter, 29 H. 2, 129

„ Wlmi., 6J., 162

VVulswce, Alan Fitz, 25 H. 2,

124
Wulvessic, Ad., 391
Wulfi, Norman fil, 13 H. 2, 109
Wulvelega (Wolley) Hy., 32

H. 2, 133
Wutton, Wm. fil Robt., 44 H.

3,229
Wycher, Alice, 10 H. 6, 503-8

,, Mich., Langford, 14 E.

1)246
Wycher, Roger, 1 1 E. 2, 453
Wychword, Adam fil Alexr., 46

H. 3, 226
Wykursley, 10 H. 6, 500
Wylne, Wm., 10 H. 6, 510
WYLOUGBY, WILLOUGBY

WYWILBY, WYLEBY (see

BUGG) —

Willougby, Hugh, 10 H. 6, 506
„ John (4 E. II.) 464 ;

(20 E. III.) 415; Pleasly (21

E. III.) 480
Willou^y, Philip (c. 2 H. III.)

463; (a Judge) 458; (13 E.

I.) 246
Willougby, Rad (5 J.) 158 ; (6

J.) 162; (6 H. HI.) 188;

(13 H. III.) 198^; (14 H.

II.) 200; (16 H. III.) 202;

(30H. III.)2I4; (38H.ni.)

222; (43 H. III.) 228; (7 £.

I.) 241 ; (15 E. I.) 247, 391,

354
Willougby, Ralf, Essover, 5 H.

3, »8^, 354, 391
Willougby, Ralf, Glapwell (3 H.

III.) 181 ; (8 H. III.) 191
Willougby, Rich (33 E. I.) 261 ;

(21 E. III.) 474
Willougby, Thos., 53 H. 3,

235
Wylot, Wm., 34 H. 3, 217
Wylyay, Robt., Swindeby, 18

E. I, 250

Wynby, Rad, 12 H. 3, 197 (see
Willoughby)

WYNN, WENHUN, (see
WENHUNWYN—

Wyne, Adam, 9 H. 3, 193
„ Dna, 30 E. i, 471-5
„ John, 20 E. 6, 476
„ Nic fil Robt. 4 E. 1, 238
„ Ralf (6 R. I.) 136; (5
H. III.) 188; (9 H. III.)
193; (16 H. III.) 203; (I E.
I.) 237; (13 E. I.) 245; (18
E. I.) 250

Wyne, Robt. (21 H. III.) 415;
(27 H, III.) 445; (7 E- I.)
241 ; (13 E. I.) 245; (6 H.

VI.) 490

Margaret, his wife
Wyne, R<^er, c. 23 H. 3, 462
„ Tom, 8 J., 171
„ Will (34 H. III.) 218 J
(13 E. I.) 246
Wyncoik, John, 21 E. 3, 480
Wyndgate, John, 21 E. 3, 481
Wyling, Roger, Sandeby, ti

E. 2, 452
Wynepol, Galf, 40 H. 3, 214

Ermentrude, his wife
Wynesle, Wm. fil Adam, 1 1 E.

2. 454

Wyrelaid, Hy. fil Rann, 12 H.

3, 197

Wyroc, Robert, 9 H. 3, 193

Wynstanton, John fil Ralf, 40

H. 3, 224
Wystanton, Ralf fil Ralf, 39 (I.

3,223
Wyte, Wm. le. 53 H. 3, 235
Wytham, Wm., 23 E. I, 252

Yap, Rich., 2 J., 148

Ybule, Robert, 5 H. 3, 183 (see

Ibul)
Yolgreve, Robt (Clic.) (53 H.

III.) 237; (13 E. I.) 246
Yolgreve, Robert, 23 H. 3, 209

,, Wm., 17 E. I, 249

Yollershand, Galf, 33 H. 3, 217
YORK, ARCHBISHOP, 69;

(I H. II.) 99; (4 J.) 155;

(27 H. III.) 441
YORK, WALTER, ARCH-

BISHOP, I E. I, 237
¥ORK, ARCHBISHOP OF

(sheriff) i and 2 E. I, 237-8
Yoxhall, John, 6 H. 6, 443
Yve, John, 10 H. 6, 503

Zouch, John (20 E. IH.) 475;

(13 H. IV.) 484; (6 H. VI.) 488
Zouch, Robt., 21 £.3, 474

„ Wm. (13 H. IV.) 484;

heirs of Wm. (6 H. VI.) 485

568

INDEX OF PLACES.

( The places marked D, are mentioned ip the Derbyshire Domesday.)

Abney ( Abenia), 80, 149, 500
Achetorp, D., 63
Adelardestreu, D., 35, 85 (see

Allestry)
Ad Walton, 472
Aeston, D., 32 (see Aston)
Agenel (Aginhall) 349
A^emund, 113
Aidele, D., 31
Aisseford (Ashford), D., 30
Aitone, D., 33
Alton, D., 45, 83
Aitune, D., 43
Aiune, D., 31
Albolton, 259, 440
Alchemantune (see Alkmanton)
Alderwasle, 509
Aldestre ( Warw.) 495
Aldwarke, 441
Aldworth, 414
Alfreton, 87, 119, 416-23-38-59-

64-71-76-81-97
Algarthorpe, 447
Alkmanton, 6, D., 41, 444-73-

75.86-90, 510
Allestry, D., 35, 506
Alreton, 288
Alsop, 476, 509
Alstronfield (Staffs.) 492
Alton, 491
Alvaston (Alwaston, Aylwas-

ton, Alwaldestune, Aelwol-

destun, Aleuuoldestun) D., 54,

314-36-47, 440-64 bis^ 469* 75»

bis, 485-87, 506
Ambaston (Amboldeston), 449

64-72 biSy 487
Aneis (One Ash) D., 30
Anesley (Staffs.) 492

„ (Nottm.) 354, 448
Aneston, 152

„ (Parva)4o8
Appleby, D., 34, 43S» 492

„ Parva, 302-3
Argardesley (Staffs.) 493
Arleston (see Erleston)

Arnhale, no, 200-13-60, 397,

434
Ash (Eisse), D., 41, 293, 445-

72.78-86
Ashbourn (Esseburii) D., 28 bis^

90, 158, 207-13-31-48, 506-9-

II
Ashford (Eissford), D., 30, 258,

445-98
Ashleyhay, 509

Ashover (Essovre), D., 51, 35-4,

46-1, 71-6, 97

Aslacton, 441

Aslakibi, 392

Asot (Staffs.) 492

Assibi, 492

Aston (Estune), D., 31, 40, 50,

65, 283, 434-75-89
Aston-on-Trent, 507-8
Atlow (Etelauue), D., 38, 476-

86-92
Avesmuch, 443^
Axminster, 165*
Ayton, 486

Babworth, 439
Bachardstorp, 420
Baggarugge, 310
Bakewell (Badequella), D., 30,

110-46-48-50.51, 293, 404-7.8

64-69-82-98
Balderton, 569
Baldton, 115

Balliden (Balden) 306, 509
Bamford ( Banford, Baunfield),

D., 58, 500
Barcouere (Birchover) D., 47
Barctune, !>., 41
Barlbro (Barlburg), D., 14, 56,

247, 3>7. 361-79-97
Barleie (Barlow) D., 60-4-5,

442-98

Barrow (Barogh, Barreuue), D.,

29, 48, 59» 506

Barrowcote, 290, 510

Barton (Barctune) D., 41, 194,

260-85, 343-5>. 4"-t2-i6-33-

36-45-48-55-72-75-86
Bar wood, 436
Baslow, D., 30, 122-46.58, 302-

94, 444-64-69-72-77-78-90-98

bis
Basingworlh, 103-46
Bassford, 414-20-47
Basturley (Leic.) 495
Bechering, 326

Bectune (see Bettune, Beighton)
Bedingfield, 151, 455
Beeley, 409, 498
Beggele, D., 31, 478
Beighton (Beitun) D., 35, 51,

64, 205, 480-98
Beledene (Bellisdene) D., 59,

167
Benedict's Villa, 314
Beniley (Benedlege, Benelic) D.,

28, 41, 509
Berceles, D., 30
Berkesford (Staffs.) 494
Berleie, D., 27
Bernai, 270

Beskwood, 209-11, 454
Besthorpe, 128, 334
Beston (Beeston) 110-24-46, 414

16-20-23-47
Bettune, D., 35, 56, 64
Bevercote (Berverdescote, Bere-

wardescote) D., 33, 50, 161-

75» 421-31
Biars, 296

Biggin, 497

Bilburg, 95, 329, 414-20-41.47

Bilderthorpe, 433

Bilderston, 492

Bingham, 168, 387, 407-12-22-

47-95» 506
Birchhill (see Berceles) D., 30
Birchland, 233
Birley (Berleie) D., 27, 497
Blackbrook, 4^4-9-77

INDEX OF PLACES.

569

Black well (Blackewelle, Blacol->

wesle) D., 30, 129-56-92-98

448-61 kis, 472-7-8
Blangesbi (Blingesby) D., 36
Blesebi, 326

Blisworth, 103-46-48, 383
Blithe (Blye) 99, 192, 394
6ocwo6d, 43a

Boilston, D., 44^ 445-75-88-92 bis
Bois, Avcnel, 296
Boleiune, D., 58, 350, 440-64
Bolsover, D., 51, 87, no bis^

115-46 bis, 148-56-57-67-74-

89-92, 220, 408-55- 79
BoluD, D., 39, 397
Boney, 416-23-43-48
Bonsai (see Bunteshale)
Bowden Edge, 500
Boythorpe (Buitorpe) D., 25-6-8,

497
Braceiey, 445

Brackenthwaite, 498

Bradburn, D., 37, 332, 490, 509

Bradeshale, D., 47

Bradestune, I)., 46, 55, 63

Bradley (Bradelai) D., 42-4-6,

308, 475-88-92, 509

Bradmer, 194, 260, 411-16-23-

48-55
Brad well, D., 52, 501

Brailsford, D., 42, 69, 444-72-

75-86.90, 511
Brailsfordham, D., 69
Bramcote, 423-46
Brampton, 316, 482-97
Brandune, D., 53
Branleye, D., 64
Brantune, D., 60
Brassington (Brazinton) D., 37,

402, 509
Breadsall (Bradeshale) D., 47,

297, 49093, 501-8
Breaston (Bradeston) D., 47, 55,

61-3, 324,438-40-4i-44-59-72-

75.506
Bredelawe, D., 28
Bredon (Leic.) 495
Bretby, D., 29, 433-41-61-69-77-

86-92, 504
Breyalston, 490
Bridgeford, 421-43
Bridgeston, 486
Brimington, D., 25, 165, 497
Bristol, 167
Broc, 397
Broctune (Broughton) D., 41,

176, 3x6-88, 420-45-93
Brochurst, 115
Broculston, 434
Broille d'Oet, 297
Bromscote (Leic.) 493
Broughton (in-the-Wold) 495
Brunesley, 383-97, 414-30-44
Bubbedene, D., 33, 44-5
Bubbcrsvill, 380

42

Bubenelli (Bubbenhill, Bothe-

meshill) D., 30, 158, 295, 302-

89, 409-19-39-98 bis
Bulcote, 250, 428-39
Button, 169, 506
Bulwell, 107-10-19, 205, 397,

407-12-34
Bunteshale (Bonsai) D., 27
Burg, 146
Bumaston (Burnayeston, Bonul-

feston, Brunolveston, Brynnal-

deston) D., 16, 50, no, 290,

412-45-75, 510
Burton (on Trent) D., 30, 100,

192, 420-21-23-39-89
Burton (Suffolk) 156
Butterley, 384
Buxton (Bukton) 42i-3i-33>40-

98-99
Byfield, 455
Byleby, 431
Bythom, 492

Calal (Calehale) D., 65
Caldecotes, D., 30, 53 (see

Chilcote)
Caldlow (Caldelawe) D., 27
Caldwell, D., 34, 287, 435, 505
Calenwood (Staff.) 493-94
Calfo (Calvoure) D., 30, 219,

410-98
Calke (Canons) 401
Calkington (Leic.) 493
Caluure, D., 30
Calow, 342, 510
Calton, 498
Calverton, 435-40
Cambridge (Staff*.) 492
Cardeburc, 158, 295
Carlton, 167-83 bis, 206, 422-

36-37-40-41-43 (see Karlton)
Carlton (in Lindric) 399, 454
Carsington (Chersington) D., 27
Castleton, joo
Catton (Chetun) D., 38, 281,

443-6I-70-77-86-9I. 505
Celesdune, I)., 66
Cellesdene, D., 66
Ceolhal (Chunal), D., 31
Chaddesden (Cedesdune) D. ,

47, no, 490-91. 93, 508
Chatsworth (Chetesuuorde) D.,

31, 469-78-98
Chelaston (Celardestune) D., 29,

49, 148-57-89, 282, 401-7-43
Chelebi, 326

Chelmorton, 410, 498 bis
Chelum» i69>72-5 (see Kelum)
Chendre, D., 31
Chenieuton, D., 35 (see Knive-

ton)
Chersington, D., 27 (see Cat-

sington)

Chester, 7

„ (Lityl) 503
Chesterfield, 87-8, 107-9- 10-28-

46 bis, i57-65-7i-73-204,443-
-61-64-71-76-82-97, 503
Chesterfield (Wingreworth) 87
„ (Newlxjlt) D., 25

Chetelestun, D., 47
Chetelstune, D. , 48
Chetelstune (see Ketleston)
Cheteslie, D., 28
Chetesuuorde, D., 31 (see Chats-
worth)
Chetune, D., 38 (see Catton)
Chevenesuarde, D., 31
Chilcote, 169, 433-41-61-70-77-

86,504
Child well, 340, 419-48
Chinewoldmaresc (Kinwalde-

mersh) D., 61-5
Chisworth (Chesword) D., 31
Chiteslei, D., 28
Chorlton, 504

Church Broughton (see Brough-
ton)
Church Gresley (see Gresley)
Church Lang ley (see Langley)
Church Somersall (see Somer-

sall)
Clareburg, 438
Clayworth, 101-7-21-80-85-94,

208, 388, 432
Clifton, D., 30, 69, 106-32.46-

47, 292 bis, 407 bis, 412-47-59
Clipstone, D., 59, 94, 110-13-

14-25-74, 411-39-40
Cliston (Staff! ) 492, 509
Clumber, 432
Clune, D., 35, 66
Cobelai, L)., 44 (see Cubbeley)
Coditunc, D., 29, 49
Codnore (Cotenour) 1)., 52, 414-

17-55-64-69 -75-85-86-87-92-

94, 505
Coland, 511

Cold Eaton (see Ei(une)

Colineeham, D., 69

CoUei, D., 36 (Cowley)

Colston (Coliston)- 238, 420-38-

47
Col wye, 382-96, 406-14-20-28-

33-47
Combremere (Abbey of) 104

Conksbury, 1)., 30, 295 (see

Cranchesbury)

Comun, D., 68

Cortinstock, 106-46, 259, 420-

21-37
Cossal, 414-20-47
Cossington,.493
Cotes, D., 27, 326-88, 401 bis,

461-74
Cotesion, 357-94, 426
Cotgrave, 151-61-92, 389, 419-

20-39-47

S70

INDEX OF PLACES.

Cotunc, D., 34, 421-35-93. 5<H

dts
Coutances, 297
Couture (Abbey) 297
Cowdale, 498
Cowley (see CoUei) D., 36
Cranchesbury, D., 30
Cratele, 318
Creswell, 119
Crice, D., 57 (see Crich)

Crich, D., 57, 113, 347-49-50»

404-48
Crocheshale (Croxall) D., 38,

408 -ss-^* -69-70-71 -85-86,

91-94, 505-6
Cromford (Cnunford) D., 27

Crophill, 186, 389, 419-33*40

Croxall (see Crocheshale) D,, 38

Cruc, 310

Crumford, D., 27, 507

Cubley (Colielei) D., 44, 283,

444-72-75 80-89
Cuckney, 94, 3H-99y 432
Cudington, 455
Cumberland, 114^5
Curci sur Dive, 320
Cuton, 258

Dalbury (Dellingberiie) D., 33,

287, 490
Danewellbawe (Hertshome) 290
Delbibi, D., 50
Dellingberie, D., 33
Deneby, D., 60, 445.47-64-69-

85, 505
Dentine, D., 31

Dentune, D., 31

Derby, 7, 8, D., 68, I00-10-50-

65-83, 225.34.37.49.92, 400.

1-2-1 1-27-51-98, 502-3
Derley (Derelie) D., 27-8, 132,

394, 498
Deri ton, 167-83, 389, 400
Derlington, loo-io
Demethorpe, 176
Dethic, 350, 485
Detton, D., 68, 82, 441

Diham, 344-54-85
Disworth, 493
Dochemanstone, D., 56
Doncaster, 101-25
Donesthorpe (Durandesthorpe)

505
Dore, D., 64, 461-71.76-80-98,

505
Dorset, 19

Dotington, 215

Dovell (see Duffield) D., 46

Dover, 192

Doverbec, 331

Doveridge, l3., 39

Drakelow, D., 62, 401.9-61, 505

Drakendish (Staff.) 493

Draycot, D., 33, 438-42-74-89,

506
Draycot (Staff.) 492-3
Dronfield, D., 26, 98, 461-80-

82-97
Duffield (Duvella) D., 46, 469-

74-91, 508
Dulveston, D., 45
Dunham, 100-83, 400-32 h's
Dunstable (Priory) 333
Durandesthorpe, £>., 63, 435
Dylsam, 455

E^ton, Long, 506 (see Eiton)
Ek:kington (Echintune) D., 25,

55, 88, 194, 245, 317, 455-59-

6 1 -64-7 1 .72-75-76-8I -82-87-96
Edensor (Edenesoure) D., 31,

51, 291, 445-72-78
Edenstow, 110, 400
Edingale (Ednunghale) D., 38,

66
Ednaston (Ednodeston) D., 35,

55»69
Edwalton, 333. 441
Eggedeston, 350 (see Oggeston)
Eggington (Eghintune) D., 54,

464-76-81-90-92, 506-11
Egham, 500
Egmantoii, 422
Egrum, 417-22-48
Egstow, 351
Eicring, 318, 43»-4>
Eisse, D., 41 (see Ash)
Eisseford, 148 (see Ashford)
Eitune (Eaton) D., 25, 436-42.

69-74-75-89, 5"
Eitune, D., 28, u^,
EUeshope, D., 28
Elmtune, 119-56, 459-64-71-76-

97
Elstretun, D., 64, 87

Elton (Eitune) D., 37, 181, 494,

509
Elvaston (see Alveston)
Emboldeston, D., 54 (see Am-

baston)
Emingham, 185
Empingham, 110
Empton, 294
Engelbi, D., 30, 59, 62, 67,

435-61

Eperston, 188, 421-37.43 h's,

Erleston, D., 49, 511
„ (Leic) 495

Ermelegh, 412

Ernebi, 103-24-46

E^notrewic, D., 52

Essebum, D., 27 /n's.y 28 dt's.,
248 (see Ashburn)

Essex, 19, 114

Essovre, D., 56, 448 (see Ash-
over)

E^tcourt 490

EstOD, 150

Estune, D., 31, 40, 50, 65 (see

Aston)
Etelauue. D., 38 (see Atlow)
Etwall (Etewell) D., 51, 54, 157,

444-7S-90, 500 (s^ Atwell)
Everwich, 19
Evesham, 16
Eyam (Aiune) D., 43, 149, 447-

64, 500

Fairfield, 206

Faitvne, D., 44

Falde, 493

Farlcie, D., 27

Farrendon, 455

Farulveston, D., 40

Fecham, 114-46 (see Hetcharo)

Felly, 354

Fenton, 179

Fernlee, 50

Findem (Findre) D., 33, 227,

433.35, 505.6
Flagg (Flagun) D., 30
Fletburg. 441
Flintham, 161-79, 381, 419-20-

37-38-39-40
Flora, 102
Forest, New, 114
Forla, Marshes, 165
Formarc, 316, 445
Fomwerk (Fomevverche) D.,

62, 463-70-77, 486, 492, 504
Foscinton, 146
Foston, 6, 124,455
Foxcote, 333
Foxholes, 194
Foxlow, 103
Freschina, 326
Froggatt, 158, 295
Furlingel, 442

Galtris, 113-14-15
Gamelston, 389, 419-39-40
Ganlike, 167

Gedlin^, 134, 421-22-37-38-40
Geldeslie, D., 43 (see Yelders-

ley)
Gerolden (Monks oQ 102-46-47
Ghersington, 282
Gheveli, D., 45 (see Yeveley)
Giolgrave, D., 48, 67 (see Yol-

grave)
Glapewelle, D., 51, 185, 354,

414-16-25-47-61-71-76-80-98
Glentword, 326
(ilossop, D., 31, 408, 502
Gonaldestan, 414
Gosberchurch, 242
Gronibi, D., 69, 420
Gratton (Gratune) D., 47, 18,

510
Grave, 421-36

f.

INDEX OF PLACES.

571

Graylings, 1 1 4- 1 5
Greehurst, D., 26
Grendon (Leic.) 493
Gresham, 455
GKESLEY WAP., 38
Gresley, 119, 414-20-47-69-77-

88-92,505
Gresthorpe, 437
Gretington, 410
Gretton, 500 (see Gratton)
(irevcJey, 432
(trimeston, 397
Grimston cu. Wellhag, 318
Gringeley, 130, 421-36
Grove, 335
Gunaldeston, 419-41
Gunby, 343-6
Gunthorpe, 225, 443

Habenai, D., 53, 87, 281

Hackthorpe, 326

Haddon (Haduna, Hadune) D.,

30, 176, 293-94, 302, 444-64-

69-72-77-78-90-98
Haddon, Over and Nether (see

Haddon)
Hadstoc, 202
Hainor, D., 52
Halen, D., 61
Halum (Haiun) D., 60-1, 451-

55-69-85, 505
Halton, 167

HAMMES FAN WAP., D., 27,

36, 57 (see Hamleston=High

Peaic Hundred)
Hamrigheheim, 326
Hampton (Stafl&.) 492
Hanlcge (Henley) D., 56, 65,

114 ^*>, 351, 428-96
Hanson (Hanzedone) D., 28
Hareston (Horeston) 114-47-

63, 209-25-33.54-58
Harewell, 426
Hare wood, 443
Harlaston, 300-2, 492
Harpes^^illa, 326
Hartington, 483, 509
Hartle (Hortel) D., 48
Hartshorn (Heorteshorne) D.,

39 (see Hcrtshorn)
llaselbeck, D., 53, 447-69
Haslington, 304
Hassop(H<:teshope) D., 30, 149,

469
Hassord, no "

Hathersage (Hereseige) D., 58,

448-69, 502
Hatton (Halun) D.,43, 492, 511
Haversham, 156
Haverseth (see Hathersage) "
Hazel wood, 491

Heanor (Hain^ure) D., 52, 465,
Hecham, 192

Heckington, 411 (see Ecking-

ton)
Hecherington, 421
Hechling, 442
Hedfelt, D., 31.
Hedon (Hetun) 421-36
Helen, D., 61
Helmetune, D., 53, 54
Henleye, D., 56, 65
Hcnnesoure, D., 5^
Herboreburg, 492
Herdibi, D., 46, 60
Heret, D., 58
Herefordshire, 114
Heronden, 455
Hertestaffe, D., 36
Herteshorn, 11, D., 39, 444-45-

61-70-77-86-92, 504
Herthill, 1 1 1, 469-78-99
Herts, 19
Heselbec, D., 53
Hetcham, 146
Hetfeld (Hetfelt) D., 31
Hethcote (Hedcote) D., 62, 504
Hickling, 420-34-38
Ilighlow (Hochelai) D., 53
High Peak (see Hamestan)
Hilton (Hiltune) D., 34, 41,

290, 308-9, 444-90-91
Hinkershill, 434-98
Hints, 309

Hiretune, D., 27 (see Ircton)
Hochelai (see Huchlow)
Hocreton, 421-37-39
Hodeshoc, 432-36
Hoge (Hoghe) 1>., 43, 507
Hognaston (Hocknaston) 509
Hoka, 444-75-86
Hokesworth, 421*41
Holebroc, D., 46
Holland (Hoilant) D., 55
Hollingtone (Molintune) D., 42-

6, 55.490, 511
Holme (Holen, Hulun) D., 30,

54, 60-1, 389, 419-39
HuimesHeld (Holmfield) D., 53-

439-59-64-71-76-97
Holon, D., 60

Holtune, D., 54

„ (see Stony Houghton)

Holnn, D., 54

Honestune, D., 26, 83

Hoone, 492

Hoorcroft, 492

Hope (Hoppa) I)., 30-1, loo

Hopton, 421, 509 (see *Opetune)

Hop well, 442-74-85, 506 (see

Opeuuelle)
Hopworth, 436
Hordlowe, 491
Horestune, D., 83
Horsley (Horslei) D., 60, 80,

145-51-93400-20-54, 508
Hortedun, U., 37
Hortel (Hartle) D., 48, 58

Hoton (Houton) 316-92
Hougen, D., 33
Hoveringham, 420-39
Hove, 411

Huchlow (see Highlow, Hoche-
lai) D., 53
Huchenal, 106-46-84,412-20-28-

43-46
Hulmers (Staffs. ) 492
Hulton, 175
Hungry Bentley, 459, 510

Ibeholen, D., 27

Ibol, 350

Iliesdon, 459 (see Ilkesdoti)

Ilkeston, 441-46 59-70-72-75-83

Ingham, 326

Ireton (Iretuue) D., 50, 510

Irewys, 414

Ivenbroc, D., 36 (see Winbroc)

Kalveton, 167, 433 (see Calver-

ton)
Kalne, 435

Kanoc, 114 (see Cannoc)
Karlington, no
Karlton, 432-33 (see Carlton)

,, (in Lindric) 207
Kathorpe, 433
Kedersly, 434
Kedleston, 173, 282, 444-45-72-

75-86-90 (see Chetelston)
Kelum, 275,420-21-37-39-96 (see

Chelum)
Kelvington, 422
Kenefare, 113 dis
Kent, 20

Keywonh, 416-23-37
Kilburn, 150, 424-46-72-75-87
Killomarsh (Kinwaldermersh,

Chinewalderoers) 1)., 61-5,

146-92, 414-47-71-76-80
Kinolton, 389
Kingshay, 200-11 -13, 400
Kingswere, 443
Ktngswood, 492

Kirkby, 106-46-94, 334-53-97»

411-21-28-38-48-55
Kirkbroughton, 511
Kirkhale, 411
Kirkhallam, 427-47 ^iV, 472-75-

86, 505 (see Halum)
Kirkholmston, 438 /'is
Kirk Ireton (see Ireton)

Kirk Langley, 459-69-75-85. 5o6

Kirklinton, 161

Kirkwood, 209

Knapetorp, 420

Knesal, 441

Kniveton, 42 1 -37 (see Chenien-

ton)
Kyngow, 438
Kynthorpe, 392

r

572

Lambcote, 420*40
Lameley, 39i6, 433
Langenedale, D., 16, 31, 103-46
Langesdune, D., 30, 46
Langley, D., 31, 52-8
Langley Meynil, 459, 506
Languar, 106-46, 259, 401-7-

-12-19-47
Langwath (Languat) 346, 439-

Langworth, 461-71
Latton, 391
Laxton, 392

Lea» 350-92, 509 w
Lecendon, 333

Lechei, 115

Lede, D., 57

Ledford, 326

Leicester, 19

Leke (Leyk) 421-44-46-95

Lekeburn, 411

Lenton Priory, 107-47-48-52,

291-93. 349-94-97-98, 434-55-

88
Lessay (Abbey) 297
Lessington (Lexington) 161-67-

71, 422, 509
Leverton (Leirton, Legerton)

150-58-61-80, 313, 400-32-33
Lincoln, 19
Linctune (Linton, Leynton,

Lynton) D., 39, 288, 440-45-

72-77-86-92, 502-4

Lindebi, 148-99, 397, 407-34-54

Lindric, 152, 212

Lilleburg, 433

Litchurch (Ludecerce) D., 68,

400-72-86, 506 .
Litton (Leiton) D., 53, 498, 502
Littleover, D., 33 (see Over)
Lochesley (Staifords.) 492
Lochetun, 392

Locho, 469-75-87-91, 508

Lodeuuord, D., 31

Lodeuuelle, D., 37

LoUington, 461-69-77-88

London (StafT.) 492

Long Eaton (see Eitune)

Longsdon (Longesdune) D., 30,
46-7, 498, 502

Longford (Langeford) 178, 387,
422, 501 -I I

Lucchurch, 183, 500 (see Lit-
church)

Ludworth (Lod worth) D., 31,
37, 220-5, 396, 406-21.33

Lullington (Lullitune) 1)., 66,
492

Lunt (Lund) D., 35, 432

Lutton, 469-78

Lyvechief, 29i2

Machenei, D., 46
Macklesford, 258, 445

INDEX OF PLACES.

Mackworth (Macheuorde) D.

35,508
Makeley, 490
Maneis (Moneyash) D., 30
Maniax, 293
Mansfield, D., 88, 1 10-19, 210-

12, 397, 428-34-54
Maperley, D., 32, 434, 508
Mapelton, D., 28, 128, 509
March, 436
Marcham, 175, 437-8
Marchebi, 326
Marchetune, D., 35, 65
Maresei, 431
Markam, 317-96
Markeaton (Merchetun) c. D.,

43, 50, 65-9
Marmoutier, 296-7
Marpul, 303, 501
Martin, 570
Matlock, 491-2
Measam (Messeham) D., 30,

435-46-72-77-88, 504
Meaton, 392-3, 435
Meerings, 443
Melborn (Milborne) D., 29, 59,

107-37-61, 225 bis
Memstrums, 310, 207, 401-8-46,

504
Mepda, 410
Mercaston (Merchevestun) D.,

50, 444-72
Merchetune, D., 43
Mers, D., 67, 76, 86-9, 90, 509-

10
Merston, D., 39, 444, 511
Meslac, D., 27
Melesford, D., 27-8
Method -we-ploth, 293
Mickleover, 237 (see Ufre)
Middleton, D., 27, 29, 32, 48,

58, 149-84, 444-48-72-78-90,

500-9
Milebom, D., 29
Milford (Muleford) D., 46, 455
Milton (Milveton) 175
Misterlon, 432-36-39
Moleton, 156
Moneyash (Maneis) D., 30, 149,

446-72-78-92-98, 502
Monteburg, 298
Montegislibti, 165
Montsorel, 116
Mont St. Michael, 297
MORLESTAN \VAP., 33
Morley (Morleia) D., 47, 51,

434-61
Morsam, 46I -7 1-76-85-87-97
Morton (Morlune) D., 53, 69
Moivine (Moruine) D., 84
Mosbro (Moresburg) D., 56,

496
Muchesdesuuelle, D., 31, 43-7
Mugginton (Mogentun) D., 50,

444-72.76-86.92

Muleford (Milford) D., 46
Muscamp, 161, 335, 438-40-41

43

Nettleworth, 149, 286, 434

Newark, 125

Newbiggin, 491

NewboU, D., 26, 87-9, 103-48,

383, 4»9-40
Newfbrest, 114

Newhall, no, 46i<7o-86-97, 504
Newham, 333

Newstead Priory, 168, 394-9
Newton, D., 29, rj, 57, 347,

435-39-61-69-77-86-91
Newton Solney, 504
Norbury (Nortberie) D., 44, 55,

510
Normanbi, 325
Nonnanton, D., 29, 49, 52, 157,

401-14.37-41-81-97, 500
Northumberland, 114
Norton (Nortune) D., 26, 64,

438-59-64-71.76-92-97
Nottingham, 7, 8, 107- 10- 1 5-24,

225-34-37-42,400-9-51-81
Nuttal, 152, 407.20

Ochenaveston, D., 28
Ochinton = Eckington, 476
Offretune, D., 31, 58, 150, 501
Ogston (Ougedeston) D., 53-8,

348, 498
Okebrook (Ockbrook) D., 55,
314, 440-64-69-72-75.85-87,
500-6
Okerthorpe, 440
Ondam Magna, 459
Onston (Oneston) D., 26
Opetune, D., 27 (see Hopton)
Opeuuelle, D., 33 (see Hope-
well)
Ophidecotes, D., 28
Osberton, 432
Oscinton, 1 10-51-58-90, 402-12-

19-33
Osleston, 511

Osmanton, 120

Osmaston (Osmundeston) D.,
29, 45 bis, 49, 507-8

Oswardeston, D., 46 (see Osles-
ton)

Oswardebec, 110-16-87,212-29,
388-99, 412-32

Ouere, D., 54

Oulcotes, 497

Ouneby, 326

Over, D., 44, 434-5 (see Little-
over)

Overton, 455

Oxcroft, 326, 414

Oxford, 19

Oxton, 174-85, 396, 498

INDEX OF PLACES.

573

Packington, 435, 505

Padfield, D., 31

Padinc, D. , 26

Palterton (Paltretune) D., 56,

346-48, 492
Parva, Ufre, D., 33
Parwich (Peverwich) D., 28 bis,

Paplewic, 398, 432

PEAK WAP., 36

Peak Forest (Pechevers, Peak)

D., 52, 87, 103-10-18-46-69-

89, 207.16-44-46-49-52-99,

408-12-83
Pcntric, D., 59, 281, 350, 464-

69.75-87
Peverekcofce, D., 36, 401
Peverelsthorpe, 1 10- 1 3, 40 1 -43
Peverwic, D., 28 bis
Pickering, 114 ^, 317
Pilecote, 492
Pillesley, 498

Pilsbury (Pilesberie) D., 37
Finapethorpe, 439
Pinneslei, D., 53, 69
Pinxton, 414-47-61-76-81-91-97
Pirelaie, D., 47
Pleslie, 175, 295, 438-64-71-76-

77-80
Plumley, 496
Plumtree, 421-37
Potlac, D., 30-3, 175, 215, 435
Prestclive, D., 30

Queenborough, 491
Quorndon, 459-64

Radbum (Rodburn, Redl.um)

D., 51, 324, 445-72-76-86-92,

500-11
Radford, 124-84, 397, 414-28
Ragenhill. 432
Ralunt, D., 30
Rampton, 157-65, 421
Ratdiff, 393, 407-11-12-19-34-38
Ravenesham, D., 26
Ravenston (Ravenestan) D., 63
Redeslie, D., 34, 4?
Redlaveston, D., 25
Reghton, 492
RempstOD, 151, 436-7-41
Repton (Rapendune) D., 29,

30, 34, 62, 240, 394, 435.

504
Reresbi, 326
Retford, 335, 412-32
Ripley (Ripilie) D., 59, 120,

350, 448-55-64-72-75-87
Risley (Riselela) D., 64, 67,

346, 438-47-74, 506
Roche Abbey, 295

Rock ley (Staffs.) 493

Rodsley (Redesleie) D., 34, 45,

487,511
Rolstanton, 504
Rosliston (Redlaveston) D., 28,

420-35-39-43-92
Rossendale, 392
Kossington, £>., 45, 510
RostOR (Roschinton) D., 45
Roucester, D., 44, 45 bis.
Rouland, 498
Rowsley (Reuslege) D., 30, 302,

498
Rowthorne (RvgetorQ) D., 64,

438-61-64-80-82
Rnfford, 1 14
Rutland, 10, 114
Ruttingdon, 158, 437

St. Botolf*s (Boston) 125, 207

St. Catherine (Line.) 394

St. James (Nottm.) 233

St. Martin's de Belesme, 296

St. Mary's (Nottm.) 233

St. Michael's (Derby) 347, 487

St. Peter's (Derby) 4^7 '

St. Wereburg's (Derby) 487

SALLE HUNDRED, 33

Saleby, 343 (see Serleby)

Salham, D., 37

Sallow (Sawley, Salle) D., 10,

33, 441-46-49-64-74-87
Salterford, 433
Salthorpe, 350
Sandeby, 435-4^
Sandiacre, D., 66, 67, 411 -14,

^505

Sapertune, D., 40, 324, 445-72

Sartilly, 297

Saulm (Salham) D., 37

Saunessey, 350

Savigni, Abbey, 297

Saxelby, 316

Saxendale, 437

Scapeston (Leic.) 493

Scardebarc, 114 bis,

ScardecIifT, D., 56, 340, 41^48-

59-64-71-76-80-82
Scardlow, 436
SCARSDALE WAP., 25
Scarsdale, 165-85
Scetune, D., 31 (see Shatton)
Scelhadon, D., 30
Schedrington, 313
Schefenton, 222
Scochetorp, D., 57, 347
Screveton, 419-47
Scrop
Scroptvne (Scropton, Scrotun)

D., 40, 491
Scrotun, D., 40, 43
Seccobiton = Sk^gisby, 174
Sedenefield, D, 49.

Segessale (Sedsall) D., 43, 283,

^75-86,5x1
Selioke, 498

Selston, 356

Sepewich, 399

Serdelaw (Shard ow) D., 32

Serelie (Shirley) D., 42

Sereston, 421

Serleby, 14$, 422-31-486

Shardlow (Serdelaw) 50

<Shalton, 501

Sheladon, 498

She] ford Priory, 394, 400

Shepcye (Leic.) 493

Sherwood, 113, 121

„ Canons, 106

Shilderly, 444

Shipley (Scipelie) D., 61, 441-

55-72-75-86, 505
Shirford, 495
Shirland, 414-82-97
Shirley (Serelie) D., 43, 115
Sibtorp, 174, 337, 414-47
Sibton Priory, 316
Sinitretone, D., 27
Sircote (Staffs.) 493
Sireleie, D., 42, 492, 511
Sirelunt, D., 52
Sivardingscote, D., 62
Smalei, D., 28) 434
Smershill, 509
Smidesbi, D., 63, 441-61-72-77-

86, 504
Smitecote, D., 52
Snelleston, 6, 16, D. 33, 44,

169-72, 283, 326-44, 475-86-

89,510
Snotington (Sneynton) no, i;y^

443
Solney (Barton) 441

Sommersale, D., 41, 475-86-89,

510
Sonsal, 283
Sorcheston, D., 48
Sothelle, D., 38
Spondon, D., 32, 46, 110-20,

445-69-72-75 Hs., 487-90, 508
Stafford, 19, D. 30
Stanford, 384, 437-55
Stanley, D., 63, 1 14-15

„ Priory, 356
Stantham, 410
St^ioa, D., 39, 47-9, 61, 67-8,

152, 225, 414 bis, 420 bis, 423,

435 ^^, 437-41-47-70-72-92,
500-4

Stanton juxta Dale, 486, 506

„ Harald, 492

„ (Stoncy) 307, 445-61-86,

504-5

Stapelford, 113, 190, 414-20-47,

506

Stapenhiil, D., 34, 62, 435

Stavelie, D., 60, 227, 402-42^

59-64-71-76-80-96-98

574

INDEX OF PLACES.

Steinesby, D., 36, 150, 261, 389,

407-23-61-81-96
Steyneston (see Steinitune)
Stendale, 498
Steintune, D., 49, 511
Stertune, D., 44
Stirap, 421-36
Stoche, D., 31, i49-9o» 421-37-

40-55, 500
Stokiim, 441
Stowa, 320
StreathHeld, 455
Strelly, 259, 397, 414 ^is
Stretton, D , 38, 56-57, 351, 421-

32-33-36-45-61 ^w, 472-77-82-

91
Stretton-in-the-Fields, 486
Stretton (Stony) 497
Suaby, 345
Sudbury, D., 36, 40, 285, 433-

75-83-86-89, 504-9-10
Sumerdibi, 326
Summersale, D., 41
Suntorp, 326
Surrey, 19
Sussex, 19
Sutton, D., 34, 35, 42, 190, 293-

95i 387-97, 411-20 ^/"j, 429-34

bis, 440-41-43-44-72-75 bis,

486-92-97
Sutton -in-Dale, 461-81

„ Granby, 438

,, on-the-Hill, 295

„ Passeis, 383
Swarston (Suercheston) D., 29,

47i 491, 506
Swarthingcote (Swardingescote)

D.,62, 505
Swartlingtoq, 492
Swynfin, 302, 490
Sydenfen, 511

Tadintune, D., 30, 500-10

Taneskia, D., 57

Taptune, D., 25-6, 65-6, 486

Teflesbi, 326

Tegeston, D., 56

Temple Norman tune (see Nor-

manton)
Teneslege, D., 27
Terescob, 310
Teversholt, 94, 353
Theyte (Leic.) 493
'I'hibbesley (Staffs.) 493
Thorite (Torp) D., 27-8, 94,

410-20-36-47, 509
Thorp (Stafford) 410

,, Constantine (Staffs.) 473

,, Bossart, 441
'I'huTcroft, 350
Thurgarton, 394, 433
Thurleston, 464, 506 (see Toiul-

festune)

Thurmeston (Thurmedeston) 4 1 1

412-21-38
Thurnton, 445
Thurvedeston, D., 46, 293, 306,

410
Thurveston, 295, 490
Tibshelf, D., 32, 261, 414-41-

59-64-76-81-97
Tickhill, 107, 146, 167, 392-93»

411
Tickenhalle, D., 29, 30, 34, 62,

435, 503
Tidesuuelle, D., 31, 175, 212-13,

233, 498, 501-2
Tilcheston, D., 61, 66

Tilne, 183-88, 388-99, 400-32

Tipton, 309

Tissington (Tizincton) D., 37,

443
Toptune, D,, 26, 54, 65 (see

Tupton)

Toringdon, 156, 192

Torlaveston (Torulfeston) D.,

47
Torloveston, 437 (see Thurlaves-

ton)
Tornesete, D., 31
Torpington, 117
Torulfestune, D., 54
Torverdestune, D., 45-7
Totinglei, D., 65, 461-98
Totingwick, 132
Totley, 414-80
Toueton, 414-9
Toxenai, D., 41
Trangesbi, D., 30, 63
Trowell, 161, 239, 383-97, 422-

30-46
Trusley, 445-72-76-86-87-90, 51 1
Tunesial, D., 36, 56
Tunstal (Slaff.) 495
Tupton, 476 (see Topton)
Turalveston, D., 48, 464
Turgisle, D., 65
Tuibuiy, 290
Tuxford, 94, 419
Twicross, 491
Twiford, D., 49, 282, 445-76-88-

92, 5"

Tyarveston, 511
Tycherby, 434
Tylne (see Tilne)
Tyriswell, 436
Tymmore, 303

Uffentune, D., 58
Ufre, D., 33 (see Over)
Uftone, D., 52
Ulvertune, D., 67
Unston (see Onesion)
Upetune, D., 26, 393 (see
Hopton)

Verlega, 147
Vezens, 296
Vower (see Lower)

Wadescel, D., 53, 61
Wadingheim, 326
Wadington, 388
Wagerby — Walesby, 313
WALECROSS WAP., D., 38
Walesby, 334, 348
Walestune, D., 38
Walkeringham, 399^ 432-36
Walthamstowe, 125
Waltune, D., 26-7-8, 190, 342,

414-35-46.59-64-70-7 1 .72-77-

bis, 488-97
Walton-sup-Trent, 248, 486, 504
Wardeby, 242
Wardlowe, 498 bis
Warcbere, 409
Wareng, 112
Watelya, 397

Watenho, 152-84, 414-20-46
Watrefeld, D., 53
Watton, 421

Welbec Abbey, 119, 243, 314
Wellaw, 313
Welle, 212-13
Welledene, D., 27
Welletune, D., 58, 326
Wellhag, 174, 348
Wellum, 433-36
Wendesly (Wodenslie) D., 27,

267, 348, 402, 509
Werredune, O., 59
Wessinglon (Wistanton) 348
Westburg, 314
Westerleke, 445
Westthorpe, 437
Westune, D., 28, 32, 59, 175,

421-33-34-37 ^«J, 440, 50>
Weston Underwood, 283, 510

Weston-sup- Trent, 507

Weya, 200

Whatton, 441

Whately Whetel, 183 bis, 248-

61, 386-91, 406-12-33-38 f

Whiteuuelle, D., 56, 247, 461-

79-97-98
Wichnore, 310
Wicheton, 243

Wichenton, 158 (see Witenton)
Widerdestune, D., 45
Widmerpol, 416-42
Wilelmestorp, D., 33, 55, 459
Wilford, no
Wilgeby (Willoughby) 292, 313-

34-96, 414-28
Willoughby-in-the- Wolds, 382
Willesthorp, 506
Willesby, 505
Willetane, D., 26, 58, 435, 507

bis
Wilne, 434, 506

INDEX OF PLACES.

575

Wilts., 19

Winbroc, D., 36 (see Ivenbroc)

Winchester, 103, I18

Windeley, 491

Windelsore, 114, 243

Winefeld, D., 36, 54, 261-81-91-

92, 414-41-59-64-71-76-97
Wineley, 492
Wineshall, D.,34
Wingereude (Wingerworth) D.,

26, 88, 306, 401 biSt 445-71-

76-82-90-96
Winslow, 15
Winsteme, D., 36, 499
Wirckesop, D., 69, 120-30-83,

394,421-36^11
WIRKS WORTH WAP., 36
Wirckcsworde.D., 27, 28, 57, 97,

IIO-J8, 207-13-30-40-418-57,

401-8-64, 509

Wistantune, D., 53-7, 461-82
Wiston, 400
Witefeld, D., 31
Witenton, D., 25, 150, 497-98
Wivelsthorpe, 121, 442-69-74
Wivelslie, D., 29, 39
Wiverton, 414-19-20-35-39-46
Wodenslie (see Wendesley)
Wollavton, 414-20-47
Woodstock, 12 1 -3
Woodthorpe, 498
Worcester, 5, 18
Wormhill, 190, 500
Worthington, 492
Wragby, 323
Wnienelle, £>., 48
Wudbu^, 110, 396-97, 414-20-

21-34-43-46
Wudhall, 506
Wudham, 289

Wodhonse, 183, 434

Wlrington, 421

Wyaslon, 500

Wychnore (Staff*.) 493

Wykham,

Wylloughby-in -the- Wolds, 382

Wynlhorpe, 412

Wysowe, 421-37

Wyveshal, 435

Yeldresle (Geldeslie) D., 43,

472-75-86, 510
Yeveley (Ghevele) D., 45, 490,

511
Youlgrave (Giolgrave) D., 48,

295. 445-90* 500
Yoxhall (Staff.) 493

CONTENTS OF VOLUME I.

Chapter I.
II.
III.

Page i— 88.

it

i>

>»
>>

>f

»»

IV.

V.

VI.

VII.

VIII.

IX.

X.

XI.

XII.

XIII.

XIV.

XV.

XVI.
XVII.

f*

it

It

tt

t>

»l

»

tt

ft

n

tt

ft

89 — 263.
265—278.

279—312.
313—319.

320.

321.

322—337.
338-357.
358—359.

360.

ti

„ XVIII.

tt

469—473.

XIX.

ti

474-478.

XX.

it

479—482.

„ XXI.

ti

483—484.

., XXII.

it

485—488.

„ XXIII.

»>

489—495.

„ XXIV.

tt

496—5".

The Book of Domesday for Derbyshire
AND Nottingham Town (20 Wm. I.)

The Pipe Rolls for the Counties of
Nottingham and Derby (1131— 1307).

The Red Book of the Exchequer for
THE Counties of Nottingham and
Derby (c. Henry II.)— Introduction.

The Barony of the Earl of Ferrars.

The Barony of Ralf Hanselin.

The Barony of Roger de Buron.

The Barony of Hascuil Musard.

The Barony of Robert de Chauz.

The Barony of Hubert fil Ralf.

The Barony of Ralf fil William.

The Honour of Peverel.
361—364. The Certificate of Wm. Briwere.
365—449. The Testa de Nevil for the Counties
of Noitingham and Derby and the
Honour of Tickill (de Busli) (1198—
1244).

The Corpus Comitatus (Corporibus Comi-
tatium) for the Counties of Notting-
ham AND Derby (ii Edward II.)

Kirby's Quest for the County of Derby
(22-25 Henry III.)

A ScuTAGE of 4 Edward II. (Derbyshire).
466—468. A Return of Tenants holding £40 of
Land who ought to be knighted, and
who are not in the counties of not-
TINGHAM AND Derby (6 Edward II.)

The Scutage of 30 Edward I. (Derby-
shire).

The Book of Aids for Derbyshire (20
Edward III.) •

A Muster Roll of 21 Edward III.
(Derbyshire)

The Scutage of 13 Henry IV. (Derby-
shire).

A List of Knights* Fees, 6 Henry VI.

The Feodary of Tutbury, for the Coun-
ties of Derby, Stafford, Nottingham,
Warwick, and Leicester.

Inquest of Knights' Fees, 10 Henry VI.
(Derbyshire).

Index of Persons. Page 513 — 567.
Places. „ 568—575.

If

it

tt

450-450-

457—463.
464—465.

ft

}f

BKMKOSB AND SONS, PRINTERS, DERBY ; AND 23, OLD BAILEY, LONDON.

gtbifaltb (bs p«tmi»STon) to Sir dfbtoarlr lenrn StanUg,

<gail of gerbfi, p.(S., ^.C.

Published by Bkmrose & Sons, 23, Old Bailey, Lopdon, and Derby;

Parker & Co., I-ondon and Oxford ; and by Wilfred Edmunds,

"Derbyshire Times" Office, Chesterfield.

THE FEUDAL HISTORY

OF THE

dounti? of H)erbi2 :

{Chiefly during the nth, /2thy and ijth Centuries),

BY

JOHN PYM YEATMAN, ESQ.

(Of Lincoln's Inn, B«rrtster-at-Law. formerly of Emmnuel College,
Cambridge, and F.R.H.S., &c.)

Author of "The Early Genealogical History of the House of Arundel;" "The
History of the Common I aw of Great Britain and Gaul ; " " An Introduction to
the Study of Early English History;" "The Mayor's Court Act, 1857;" "An
Introduction to the History of the House of Glanville ; " "A Treatise on the Law
of Trades Marks;" "The Origin of the Nations of Western Europe;" "The
Records of Chesterfield ;" "A Treatise on the Law of Ancient Demesne;" "An
Exposure of The Mismanagement of the Public Record Office," &c., &c.

The Author has the gratification to announce that he will have the assistance

of

Sir George R. Sitwell, Bart., M.R, F.S.A.,

who has made extensive collections for the Counties of Leicester, South
Yorkshire, and Derbyshire, in editing the Hundred of Scarsdale.

Mr. Cecil J. S. Foljambe, M.P., F.S.A.,

will assist in editing the Hundred of High Peak ; and other Gentlemen
uf high Literary repute will assist the Author in compiling
* other portions of the Work.

Price for the whole vork TEN GUINEAS^ if paid in adt'anfe ;
Large Paper Copies^ Ttvo Guineas extra.

To be published in sections of about 250 pages, Royal Octavo, each
price Haifa-Guinea, or on Large Paper, 2s. 6d. extra. Two sections
will form a Volume ; each Volume, which can be purchased separately,
will be complete in itself, with full indices, the whole work to be com-
plete (if possible) in Twenty Sections ; the subscription price will not
be increased whatever the extent of the work.

Only a limited number of separate parts will be sold, none until all
subscribers' copies are distributed. 300 copies only will be printed, a
portion of which only will be offered in England. £ach copy will be
numbered and signed by the author.

The first portion of the work will be occupied with Collections of
Fees made from Domesday, the Pipe Rolls, the Testa de Nevil, Kirby's
Quest, the Book of Aids, the Subsidy Rolls, and from other sources of
the same character, in a form somewhat similar to that adopted by
Major-General Wrottesley for the Staffordshire William Salt Society.

The parochial portion of the work will commence with the Hundred
of Scarsdale, and after giving a history of its successive Lords, will
contain that of the different Parishes and Manors, commencing with
the Parish and Manor of Eckington.

The General History, with an^introduction, will complete the work.
The publication of this part is delayed in order to include all discoveries
made during its progress.

The work will be embellished with illustrations of Castles, Ancient
Manor Houses, Tombs, Crosses, with some modem Mansions ; and
with many Plates of Seals and Coat Armour.

In order to meet the wishes of those who care less for par-
ticular History than for the contents of certain documents, some of
which have not yet bee^ edited, the author has determined to reprint
certain portions separately, at a uniform price of 5s\

No. I. — The Dome.sday for Derbyshire, is already published,
88 pages.

No. n. — Extracts from the Pipe Rolls for the Counties
OF Nottingham and Derby, with Notes, 174 pages.

No. III. — The Red Book of the Exchequer for the
Counties of Nottingham and Derby, with copious
Notes (now in the Press).

No, IV. — The Fee Books for the Counties of Nottingham
and Derby, consisting of The Testa de Nevil,
Kirby's Quest, and the Book of Aids, with an
explanatory account of each of them.

No. V. — Extracts from the Subsidy Rolls for the
Counties of Nottingham and Derby.

No. VI. — The Domesday for Nottinghamshire is in course
of preparation, uniform with the above.

And possibly some others will follow.

For the convenience of reference to the general Index of this
work, the paging of these reprints will in future be identical wit4i
those of the Feudal History, of which they are a part ; the Pipe
Rolls are paged differently. The printing of this Index, which
is already partly made, will be deferred to the conclusion of
the whole of these collected materials, and it will itself be a valuable
work for genealogists, since it will contain, at one view, not only the
names of persons and places, but the dates of all entries in the Rolls,
and the localities relating to each name, and, where it is possible,
dividing the group of each name into separate families ; in fact, under
each name a skeleton Pedigree of the family will be given. It will
thus be a guide for anyone desiring to trace the history of a family to
all entries in certain of the public records relating to it. The Index
will for this object be published separately in this series of extracts.

WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR.

THE HISTORY OF THE HOUSE OF ARUNDEL.

One Volume, folio, large paper copies bound in Morocco, Price Six
Guineas; small paper copies bound in cloth, Four Guineas.

Mitchell and Hughes, 140, Wardour Street, W.C.

The Author has the gratification to receive permission to publish the
following very generous criticism of the First Port of this Work from the
pen of Mr. Thomas Helsby, the learned Editor of the last edition of
Ormerod*s History of Cheshire^ who writes : —

** I have had the pleasure and profit just lately of pcnising an admirable book of
the kind (Mr. Pym Yeatman*s recent work on the Earls of Arundel), which contains
a great amount of entirely original matter, with all doubtful points acutely raised, and
well — almost intensely — argued, showing the zeal and pains which have backed up the
learned Author's judicial powers and natural acumen. Of course, like all other
history, this one of a family which represents in tlie aggregate avast extent of Norman
and English territory, is of a tentative character, but the valuable historical and
genealogical matter is purified from the ordinary dross of such productions by having
had the advantage of passing through a mind evidently thoroughly capable of reducing
it into that state best suited for the critical reader ; although repetitions may be found
numerous enough in works of this kind, they have their use in constantly keeping
before the mind of the reader facts and arguments that less tenacious and oidinary
minds would let slip."

And the following from Sir Bernard Burke, Ulster King at Arms,
with reference to the whole book : —

" What a wondrous store of information you have laid up for genealogists in your
p^rand * History of the House of Arundel.* I am at every leisure niomtnt poring over
Its contents."

Extracts from the "Manchester Courier" of 30th March, and

eth AprU, 1883 :-

FIRST NOTICE.

"In an age when the press teems with stately folios, lumbering weak -backed
quartos, and even with octavos, of History, Genealogv, and Arch«eolo«jy, every one
of taste and learning may be congratulated on the binh of a new folio of great
originality and meiit, and from the true historical standpoint. * The History of the
House of Arundel,* taking us back for a period of looo )ears, is one of those Works
which may well have employed the valuable hours of a member of the learned pro-
fession to which the Author, Mr. Veatman, l^elongs. The ju<Iicial faculiies wliich he
has brought to bear upon his subject have, on the whole, thrown so searching a light
upon some long-buried points in national history, as well as genealogical problems,
that the volume will be hailed by every scholar of unbiassed mind with the cordiality
it deserves. * The Early History of the House of Arundel ' is that of many of the
most Historic Families in this country and in France ; and the bridge, which hitherto
has been almost of the flimsiest character, is now fairly established upon the sound
basis of numerous, if often frngmentary, facts — worked together, it may l>e, by some
defective arguments, by much necessary repetition, dry and wearying details, but, on
the whole, with a sagacity and aaimen that redeems the work from all reproach."

" Noibing c^n well be of greater interest to the student than the genealogical
connection of this kingdom with that of our continental neighbours and the old
Puchies of Normandy and Brittany. Absolutely little of consequence was known
(and this far from accurately) until the publication by the late distinguished Herald,
Mr. Planche, of his * William the Conqueror and his Companions.' Sir Francis
Palgrave in his Work was barred from going into all those details of history so neces-
sary to a just appreciation of the connection of the ruling houses of England and
Normandy, but his eloquent sketches of the Duchy will never fade from the memory
of the cultivated so long as history holds its domain in the human mind. Other
gentlemen of repute have since written upon this subject more or less fully ; but it
srems to have remained for the present learned Author to unearth from the various
archives of the French Republic, and from the great stores of materials in the Pipe
Rolls and the Red Book of the Exchequer, and those in the possession of the Duke of
Rutland and Lord Arundel of Wardour (extending in date from the reigns of the
Dukes of Normandy and regularly down to the time of Henry III. of England), a
large amount of original information, which, although of so fragmentary a character
in many cases as .to necessitate the utmost industry, skill and circumspection in using,
has enabled Mr. Yeatman to give to the reader something approachmg a sound and
reliable Work on this interesting period of Anglo-Norman history."

SECOND . NOTICE.

'* To handle all the multitude of facts in this book (far exceeding in number, and
of!en in abstruse significance any disclosed in the greatest cause cilibri\ and to deal
wiih them in a comprehensive manner, giving full effect to the numerous subtleties
of meaning they often disclose, requires a grasp of intellect which can never be too
fully appreciated. It is not surprising then if some should slip out of hand,
and it would ill become the critic to score his page with black marks where there
is abundance of merit so conspicuous to compensate for almost any degree of
shortcoming, especially in a costly first' edition which cannot easily very soon be
supplanted by a second.

'* In conclusion, the least that can be said of * The History of the House of
Arundel * is, that it is an admirable collection of facts ; and, if for this reason
only, is very valuable, but its facts are skilfully arranged, and the learned Author
has placed them in the most candid manner in every conceivable light before the
reader, however laboured his efforts may occasionally appear; and after the judg-
ment and research displayed in this work, if he has failed to command, he has
certainly deserved success. As a volume for. the earnest student of both direct
nnd circumstantial evidence, it is to be warmly commended ; and the many tabular
liedigrees will repay the perusal of every one interested in the stream oi history
which connects so many of the past and present races with those of our own. We
cordially congratulate Mr. Yeatman on the production of this admirable book."

From the " Bristol and Gloucester Archaaologrical Journal,"
Vol. VII., Part L, a criticism by Sir John MacLean of Bicknor

Court :

"The chapter on the settlement of the house of St. Sauveur, in the West of
England, will be found of special interest to our readers, inasmuch as it gives the
origin of many ancient families in the western counties, but the space at our
disposal will not admit of our entering into details.

■-" To compile an authentic pedigree of one ancient family is no light task,
but to grapple with those of many of the Norman nobility and trace their
descendants respectively from original authorities is a work of Herculean labour,
and Mr. Yeatman*s Book, when completed, will form a monument of industry and
patient research. He seems to be well acquainted with the several personages who
come within his range, and, throughout all their shifting scenes, maintains, upon
the whole, a firm grasp of their individuality. That there are many, and possibly
important, mistakes in such a work would be unavoidable, and some of the state-
ments made seems to us not to "be vouched for by sufficient evidence ; nevertheless
allowing for all these errors and shortcomings, the Work will prove a most useful
contribution to English history and genealogy."

^

THE ORIGIN OF THE NATIONS OF WESTERN

EUROPE.

Price 6s.

Burns and Gates, London.

. *' Every one must own the clearness of style, the cogency of argument, the wealth
of illustration in the way of learning, the depth of thought, and the perfect indepen-
dence with which the history of England is sifted. To many, perhaps most people,
the criticism on the Aryan Theory, &&, wiil seem like an unpleasant revelation, but
we strongly -suspect it will be found far from easy to answer this lx)ok." — The Metro-
politan^ 30/A August^ 1879.

" Mr. Yeatman is one who has had the courage to combat popular opinion on
Philology. Should the statements contained in the book lying before us be true,
and to bear testimony without prejudice, we think it will be no light task to prove the
basis of his theory to be untrue, the Oxford School of Philology is undubitably
worthless, especially Max Mtitler^s Aryanic Theory, which, in plain language, rejects
the Mosaic Account of the Early History of Mankind, and holds up the Sanscnt to
l)e the parent of all languages." — The Ancklatid Times (u/ Notice), 26^/1 Sept,, 1879.

A TREATISE ON THE LAW OF ANCIENT

DEMESNE.

Written in Illustration of the Records of Chesterfield.

Price 3s. 6d.

Wilfred Edmunds, Chesterfield.

Prom Dr. Charles Cox's criticism of the *' Records of Chester-
field (Journal of the Derbyshire Archseological Society, 1885.")

'* Tbe work of transcribing, translating and editing these archives was entrusted
to the capable pen of Mr. Pytn Yeatman, and most ably has he done his task. The
introduction is helpful and original^ its only fault being its brevity/'

"The work has been most ably done by Mr. Yeatman, than whom no one could
have been found more comi>etent for the task, and he has preceded the body of the
work by a masterly, pble and valuable historical preface, which adds immensely to its
value."— 7%<f Reliquary, April, 1885.— By the Editor.

*• This little book deals with a subject that is very interesting just now, and the
records quoted by the Author, from documents relating to the Borough Courts of
Chestertield, are exceedingly curious. Mr. Yeatman gives some curious facts from
Manor records and elsewhere, and his essay appears to us to contain some important
facts which are well worth close attention from those whose special study it is to
reconsider the history of land-holding in England." — Tfie AtUiquary, December, 1884.

Some Extracts from the Press relating to

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF EARLY

ENGLISH HISTORY, &c.

The Metropohtan, 14th Augfust, 1874.

"Old-fashioned people who believe in * Mangnall's Questions,' * Pinnock's
Catechism of English History,* or in Hume and Smollett, will read this work with
fear and trembling. We are not prepared to endorse all the views set forth in these
pages, but the book is so immeasurably above the ordinary run of histories, which
are mere repetitions of facts previously invente<f and judiciously arranged, that we
must cordially advise every reader to study It intently.