Historic, archived document
Do not assume content reflects current
scientific knowledge, policies, or practices.
a ee)
By pats iy ARE
fe
te ee ee
tee ae db
POL aa
rae ieee Wear eter 2)
Rae Malu
Fee Se eee
di Vb dot
Nips
WI reli bi
PaaS ai
DAL
Abd OG By
Todd bash mp
Dene ee NL eect Se Sete Tt
CR id
PAM te AA TAS hy AEN BS Reba
Vpy
HST
ye
hay! yy
CMY DHE MO NE:
Ni Vey PONE AURL eazy
HAP avthsy! wanginche ay aie
\ Db.
VS
| yy wt i
0) Sane Hoy
yy yeyiyey
Oe Nt Ayaan a Nye
eyo
Renna
Waehe Welte’s
Wy Ey sty
yay
Eyer be ea
healt
wi ait
PUTS Ne eth ih
yy dbrAladsig
: vat aiat
yyy nae
veaiintaea she qoucyaaty
AN
ae
seava gin tyin
1)'s. ae
Vina Orie)
Ve yoy
Dds
DIVA Foam TYTN ANE
(eiiwsryrytas
In
aaa yen rad
ie slalee tay :
rata ie evanee
RAS
viphe sts
NIMH Hel Rae ad
Peso varrean bie
NES yy
Pa ibe Ate
Na)
ate
Mvinvgiy
Neen
Wie vent it
¥ Vi erren
q vAstven?
hres rhe yi wwe t?
let id blab ey! eteh
SreAe,
Wei Perelg ty
nt
wa}
AHNy
NEMS MEDORA IRS
aD i
Pier iy
4 rnhthecteea ae ee
} Beran
na BAN setae peepee ly
A Shit te
Ey VOR A eae
v4 HGR Namah
Kink hy Sf fn Wnty
\
ah
ot
i
vee
fi ve ma
tra yi eV rath } “y
i Bas
j
eh ‘4 as Jae Rena sini dy’ 's 4 rh
Hr
ayny
Hoyer ASN DN waa
oF ae
5
Heaitnn
Ms any Tata hta
no Dv he sain
Acie ot oa we
afd
iat a
Path)
stent
rhe)
War geae hens Ar
) ia
ar Thr
an eiy pi ts ngs:
prbens hy asa. y pat |
iM Ven ene fl
Re ae
Wirods erat i
Aye
Hs
Aca rb ae Ny
TCA! A mG Pa DEAS os
4) es a Fest 8
es
aan
baths
yeipdiy ofp
ie
INR
ape adidas A
Ia:
ARE Eset i
ye NOREM NY ta litn
ES Maa VOID
Be
My ere!
. Syd ye sp ocird Vi Mi ati¥e
Thencarnrana ra (he) i
q hal aT
phi b EN snaaeaat eu pt AL agi if
“ pata inna: Mh ny M2 \ on
ONAN ealye
Pr tthereieny NP ey tiaras
ATM AMSAT SEE OSorr bey sly?
atic! ips
agnese KA A
Tymibg bias
Aya vag hae
aire
a mt Loh sa ye
ct me en mi in fs Mi 4
TAT yyayehre EEA Tu rbeNen ally ng PaSernears fae?
a AVVES if NATE AMATI erates graye
PANN ai ret wey ea
¥ 7
VINE Wats
NAS
TaSzN
str,
yd yovtie niaca i
FoInd Sint ise foe!
Rar avvniets ek nein iid
Pru th tea (MERE BUEN
Bho aingy
prepares hy
Wil heart
alates
By fas
Er eurbeiyhgdiithy Wot !
praegy' Paty Aine Oh .
‘ ve avery
PATNI M
Ve Re er
Hd dana taed ta 989
Ps eae orth KONA.
PDP I TORT Mea ag
bnene Mites aa atren auLS
PASM
ALAR:
Hava ed
Ve gee
eee
Veet
PEG pores raat
HOP Vet acts
PP Pats Pi
ae Te Wavinen,
PRI ean,
ebdad wr gy? Dyer ad nek
Pratougcersy aly
Fees fire
AV ER OEY
No wey sie dah by iets essere Fea
Pisroide dee aed Gates
; ]
evs bidwi tyes
DivipereAgobva ney
EA OG pays
La anal re ars
RST UT ese A irenine poh
ged
HPPA Db bey KE DD Db gut
Steal)
Pa) Un pane bioR eta)
ie ar HE ns eee Eg
DLE Goh D RH pte dot
OP Te HRS BP tt
Lig gbtotyst coageaclia
shy f
Do vin ea,
Hien etan reais d. Digs bop by etdaads beds me reba tc eal
fps PN GL ibs ae aed bs be dbs
ie
Dither ath he Gea au
Hr bee fan p ats
tet deg aide deri ed
Wie Gs
THAD Baro FED ROMA NON pa LD
Fp A id gui seo Bap hele lb
pte j
ae
Ce a ae
mh? |
Vibe ds
Mie pm butea tbe hai
<b ee MWe sul
LWA, Debts bak io
hah AY bho
Lose peace ts)
en
rian
nk Te
Sheed tue bes tall
He sus
oe ear +
Wd hited
eee
wok
Ptwient
een
Ded Hata byhye
VU har ®
Sete
ey
Be IL ee Ua
1 Hib ib dap
bebe dds yi
MEN Oa kab
HOP shat dee
FUR aa
Pp noted alk
i
Neb ged
BAPE IG tea haed Gen)
Ah vib yl
PETS EA SiS nl sie
sy
MA MM ee
HAs Ker a
Waa Ahh untae
, 4 ye
4
Ad
poxectorond
ty
to
Ce ene a
ae ae |
Ua a)
we
ab aN
enn
ya
Merona eit
sida Het a
ae
hye
yr
ne
#
wy
?
3
HOP Mee
RO en
4}
PUTO Ma Ue
,
rae)
IP ae
Dee ne
PADILLA
Btn
VD RY SABRI yy
Hag Hoang Ua hs th
rd PEP Ai re
Ves
penny
tH duane d
nore p popy end
et Nee Etat
ye EEA a bel
Db abok ted Bought seedsiay
Pen) ee a a ae
Vaid tab Athos) eM Oh Lae
i Ui nes Ay be hao ha by
0a
beatae
(aril aah
Hit Fpl 3 ta
Pd tetatiae, Hain ngiske
4 WV A Ae ate
shabor daha Cal
raise chia 9)
i ut
Riel,
qi? iy hing
PS yoisep cea De dgae
Prins eu
Mii
vd de
AI a)
DOL Deh oy
WD UI OR Leg
ad
Deals ’
wie ner M ita
DA ee a rn
ee OV eee reine
De Mideed 1 he
Der
ate ET hd ii iY
Wena bb pass ue ed
Pe ean pate pa ide
WPT Pd ee ead
eae id
DU RE De ad
Pde Veith
ended Da
ue
wy
TDS oe
ibd pati tau
FOUN hedaa 0k
Wade adj doa rde fli
thoy babe
por aan
oe TA LIVI OK,
Pea Reiuat fiat Fee rh i by
Pveataancieyy rit te
Pain
nets ttt
Hag
ot)
ay
145 lees art]
4 Pinay teat He
ofits erat
a OM
ied de)
Run
vy
Ae AS
’ ibaa asi
iin MG WG viens iy
Ba be):
is Wy
tebe eke
Weed bub gi
i
TYE PO)
be AED
Hare ond
weed)
Gea iM
Way go’
Os MP en
rece!
Aye
ad
ii
Wl
Bend
eM
HAND Ab
WW) ‘in 4 Hs ih
4 i
Hi a i
Heh a
Dies ‘ is ,
Bae
HAAN Sg kat PA Ti UPS denare
ve ¥ polar) mel
PLEA bern
Ut ma re oF ATR OT eteeeen Fain i
vba, tii is
» Hd
Hn eG)
ap a
ub eae
ahd Tut abndcrh faa,
FMT
Cox
Tiga ese f
Wah REA Wh
ilar
Lasiengnenyalata an (he
Hated Perna e artery
CaS FiA EBA On gay:
i raat MATAR VIRY Vp
‘ } Rr Viniel
HE Wy pereenrvenen
Fa thes TN
i Bit
Hoth) ne eh em
MAeyeneneeee
x
i 2 daynta snr!
5 i?
BATES Fa ah ( Ay
Ayathls Phy
ny’ Wyatt
sf erede ry
mews TaN? Giri
uvnunitg! betes
idiok ih
wy
PUES Mtns
wid tnegs rer
eae Ne Vr EKA
Aaeteeattin erate Ae
AAS AA A Bi int GNI NEY
pba ied Wet UI Sd 5
HIM ees ries
sfaltat ai
f Reotees Het Oa ewan:
denied
sts
i inrictrerats
leone
A HN
fade hea ti
Peso i
Defect Mei
bli Mp ine Bota Or then 34
Mintircncagay
by
Mien eetiee
apie ott Phyeed
Pa Cath NCE gs
Peis bee
Svat ea age Sao 4
Pye
an
hake abante
eitan enya Ue
AP HCH tava rua aren icatY IF EN ee A
PEP ANT SATE TEES ON at
oy
chs
ERT NY
MeNPARArn TPL
me ates
italy, raat
bane
fs
eM Fsgure tent yee
ce ALA net Th
aA os
ie pause
FT Acoe gnu Rese
Ae Keita itew
Or ea Te? wt
PH Ac g tere)
MeL ee te leaeen ihn
Shinty
eangrpasivees Sra
ent?!
oy
acai puyra el
Tuyen rere eee DCO h beeen (8 Paral
Heat biteetee abies Putae ct oy
Ria bop int
ea i Oh fen
peri
40h Cs
oe
eas
if
Wd iene be tas
errs aus dre rae
Sruaviang? AD)
SR ahaa HAF
a
Oe Per ania aunnenieenely: avec
OMEN TH Perit kPa Ran ed
Pier nie
Pete eae a)
Bers
yay aesas
pa Hie “8547
Baik ages
se
Batata
Lal hh gel dee
age y Rieerirtay
ee Berar
pero ae a
en Dea
b stiaataicgtbus sah Pitt nee
SEPM T rin ras eet) He Fa
ai) a
hte aa ttt 44 Beat onda Sides
; rsa ee ese
AED ek
ished
Ba aaa
ait
Atak Renee, sirens
ey
india hy) whl
Slaciseae vein ay
% hess
Ten
A ach Pred ve hee al
He
Ab ea ene aoa
a Aves gahied
Pp acitheh ts
Tiree anes
Finnie
pari
Senet
fea re det
47 rare
Sabie
ih n py its Piles a:
ie avitaehdae nae h
Bs an
pie: Sree
tpane
an Bins mihcien
Le ne 4
mise iat ft
A She fhe BUDE ng
Herp ‘ipihs
Dien ene brs
me eins
i Cia
at on
water
etek
SENG inseah ae
Ayarys
eu 3s
ote
at tnrhiey
Neen! DRIER *.
Hct md eM
riya
AY.
,
45 Bead leach
bine hs
BANS
inchs oh
Ae
A
hb et i
tans Sas
Avera d 1 Fe
aye M8 sh
eid Ceri Areata ae
County
ALLS Ti Pinca
ys rae
Tie doaoutaend
Mien at
raeareaPC CNC
Tipe siyagnetor angst?
d en
Nhat? es
mh EAE VA AY ager Rea
cried gre ean ernest
Satie pene th heed e
rete DP er dE eee
fepreitn vor fet
Rabat et ah deel
Ferg com yAvN
Lge ikea
fron
Deine ude cup eel evr ates iter.
iene
Cad dred Ts hg che
Lape Poe Fp OY
ae te a
Poieieetase
Shaan mings we
SURE
SNE a
ay apapeaine amet
acres te
nm
¥
Rate
(ie
{ua aiirnderite
Figentdauadyente 6
Faden gt ete uese eit
ears
Papas vepiaey Pau eie asf
otaaipierr go tant Mica ere:
SGeetonmaetan pean ret tava!
Care roe ewan
(heii
pain
eee Mohit
ous
abe
ee
ALAC oe ae nwa
in
ushestralee
VAM Ee
Patemauiae
re ee
Cit ay)
#a8s
pee br
er
mie
Hai
ap itis
TTR Basho
Tene be piebary aun tike
Pern ee ewes
Ea
ey det
ri
ie) Hit ro
Rag oleh
itt ite .
Ht ae a aa
ch
Y ype
site
H teatro
Ly -
ee yaa barat R
rt sre tt ay 2 ae
uM
pin iat a
une
Wan)
nica a
ae
enol
d ith
oe
a
U.S. Forest Service
Research Paper_ INT-5
q 1963,
a,
p
FOREST FIRES IN ALASKA ,
by
Charles E. Hardy and James W. Franks
Yor
INTERMOUNTAIN. PoRET AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION
, Forest Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Sp. Ogden, Utah,
Joseph F. Pechanec, Director
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are indebted to a large number of people who assisted in furnishing information,
data, and suggestions for this publication. Roger R. Robinson, State Director, Bureau of Land Manage-
ment, Alaska, and his assistants rendered an especially fine service in furnishing background infor-
mation, facilitating collection of technical information and data, supplying fire reports and pertinent
data from official files, and making it possible for the fire behavior teams to go to fires and collect
valuable information. Clarence Watson, Climatologist for the U.S. Weather Bureau in Anchorage, gave
the authors information on climate and weather beyond that which was readily available in printed
form. The several members of the fire behavior teams, with minimum supervision and under adverse
and, at times, dangerous conditions, performed a very creditable job of collecting fire behavior and
weather information on going fires. Six Montana State University forestry students exhibited consider-
able interest and initiative while performing the laborious task of compiling and analyzing data and
in constructing preliminary graphs. DeLynn Colvert, Forest Service Draftsman, reflected his interest
and understanding of the problems in his artwork and graphic representations. To all of these and
many more, the authors are most grateful.
GES Heandwawak
CONTENTS
Page
CCIE H oT eet ed Dail B68 8 oY 6 UEC 0 0 ee oe ee 1
| Eby oLorstevop ecg] ol Ksjad Sebi] 0) ees (0) «eee eee ee eB ane ere ne Eee eee eee 1
Miterabubetlvevte wa sisters ee eels a8 a2 2s se atest c cadena Seas teneee 1
SECU aba ETA SS ae Rep ee eee 3
@hapter 2:-- Vialuestat Stakes «ic iieh Gesell ence ete eet 9
ADSL AERESOUTCOS 22sec 25 Sy ve cs bec cde da deces eeesegapacsceececesezececeanensbel 9
Fish and Wildlife Resources ....................2.221....----:e¢ecce-eeeeceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 11
J REVS) oh 9 Weel 8 e165 8 YG. = le ee oe ee Nr Peer 11
ERY UIT e9d 8221 0 «eta a pe er a le 11
Recreational “ReESOUPCES \.....<..........--..00.c.se.-secenena-ceagepssedecccsscnenececaceesuceecsese 13
JAS ETW CU G2 5 2h hs NP a aR eo oe 15
NINE WSN GS) 0 6 Fs se oe ae ee 16
\UISYES LO nas ey ac tp el Pe 17
Assessment of Damages .................-.22...--.2..00--20ccceeeeceeeeeceeeeneeecenteeeeeeteceeees 19
Chapter 3 - Geography and Climate —.....22...220220.20.22ceeeeeeeeteeeceeeeeeeeeeee es 21
Bhysicals GO@srap iyo -222-<sisc 025. cocs sete ccccusbecetsssic ac dctestacdcencccidecucteteteestiesixesss 21
South asta one cee foe ok tet Nee Ps ose 8 cathe rye re oe 21
G@opper River alley 2.2 2.2. feces cece cas cadseneddeseeusuanaldeeliccenesteate 21
okra eee ess oe a cadence dhs tacaele aac 24
| 5H STO) Mas] Fe hips eae re 21
WeSC Cribs seect act nce cS i ee oo, Jvc deacatvedencaceiddeiee sls tentey Sener 2.2808 22
PA CHIC SIT AINA Oxi co oes sce basacnc Lesa egvasdedsdasuechadaeeesUicseletecacdececcs-eose 22,
VG RRET A OVRCH SF: 551 0 EAS oe oS i ee el ee 22
(CUTE YS) Sa CaN 8 he 22
Zone of Dominant Maritime Influence ...........0.......20. 220. -eee eee eee eee 23
Piranisitione HONG tes ioe at ae ie eg ohn te ft 2 Se 23
Dominant Continental Zone 2...-.22:2....c.--ce-ce-e-eececeee,enceeecaeceesneececenee-- 24
IAS GEG (Oe ALG) 0 Bagge ari Re eo 25
Weather Factors That Affect Fire Behavior and Control .................... 25
JES RSSICON (0561 da Nc ae en 25
“RESTO 6; 21 0 ee i ee 27
| ELSES BOYS REN ce le 28
Relatives: Murmaidity: 2.28.08 .22.cicce.cceacccaeneceeesec cos cevessceseocecncdasceccheeasectueds 28
Wengthvor Daylight. ecco csecechoeceee tl celecale lace oeteecceeeescdue. 28
DLT Cheer start erie oe seers nee i Dh as ope eee 29
Sey Conditions 25 * a ces eo ee eo cll ae 30
Significance of Deviations From Normal _......................--.---.... a2
(OOF OY Ey ger On 8 Co) <n cc 35
JA) El BY =*ST oh 8 (0) 0 a 35
ISHUAS) cara Re 8”. CN ye 35
ConGinmtty es kee se ee I 35
Cover Vype- Classification: 22.05. <sicn ccc cced case soc socceeceseocdcctececeeeeccseet cn. 36
Early Stages in Forest Succession 20000220 ooeocoeeeee eo eee eee 36
Secondary Stages in Forest Succession eee SH
Climax Oreste Pa ese! even Meh a ee 37
CONTENTS — Continued
Page
Chapter 5.- Fire-Danger Rating ’=.2.2-25 == ee 41
Use: of Fire-Weather Information: 22-2) eee 41
Seasonal ‘Trends in Fire’ Weather 2.22 222 eee 44
Diurnal Fluctuation of Fire-Weather Factors ................222.-.--:ee-1000000+- 44
Chapter'6'- ‘Fire Statistics :..2. 2 ee ee ee eee 49
Historical 22% Brae ee Te 49
Comparative:Statistics 2.2.03 2 a ee eee 49
Interior Alaska, With Continental United States _..............02.002...... 49
Interior Alaska, With Southeastern Alaska ...................0000...22-..---- 59
Within ‘Interior Alaska\: 20's 25, See ee ere 59
Chapter: 7.=. Fire CasevHistories =. os Se eee 69
eal yisire x <2 cet a 2 ee a 69
Murphy Dome. Pirée).. 0203 ee ee ee eee 70
Kenai Toake: Wire) 2.22 sie Sa eS ee ae 70
Colorado. Creek th ire 0 ee 73
Lake 606" Hire 252 or ES ee ree oe Ce ee 76
Stony (Rivers Pure mri se Se eee ee ce ee 78
Huggins Island@“W=10: Hire 2 ee Ee ee ee 78
SUNITA Ty 2s Se a aise i ea ete aN hee ce 81
@hapter.8\=Fire: Control, 22.2.8 ee ee 83
Hire: Control Organization, 4425.04. ae eee 83
Presuippressions 6-2-0 os Serle ee ee 83
Detection: 2. 2:1s< sete cee et on ws Ss Noe aie & nee 86
SUppression),..... [sisi 2) ee ER ee pee Soe a Re eee 89
Fire:as a. Management "Tool ..:3-:.5 2.20. ee Gee eee 93
IRETCTENCES i288. oe 2 oes a cede al LON a OIE RA a a 97
J 3A) 0) 0) 000 |b. Giana yee Se MRS GA: i Te can A ety ced tee ie 101
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE OF THIS PUBLICATION
Alaska has long been thought of as an area
to be exploited rather than developed. Only
recently have the advantages of managing a
continuous resource gained much support. Even
as late as the end of World War II the official
feeling towards the timber supply in Interior
Alaska was pretty clearly indicated in the follow-
ing quotation from a United States Department
of Interior report, (USDI 1945): ‘It seems reason-
able to suppose that little of the interior timber
will ever come into the general timber-products
markets though birch trees of the best quality
are suitable for cabinet making... .”’
The term, “‘Interior Alaska,’ describes that
portion of the State which lies west of the 141st
meridian except for the rugged south coast east
of the Kenai Range on the Kenai peninsula. Most
land south and east of this line is managed by
the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Serv-
ice in the form of three National Forests. All the
rest of the State, some 360,000 square miles, is
protected by the U.S. Department of Interior's
Bureau of Land Management; 225 million acres
require active fire protection. The 1950-1958
average annual loss from fire is 1.1 million
acres; however, this varies from 37,000 to more
than 5 million acres in individual years. Some
administrators hope that knowledge gained
through research and development will increase
our effectiveness in combating fire and lead to a
reduction of the annual loss to one-tenth of this
tremendous amount.
This publication was written to serve two
audiences: The first consists of those who are
interested in the fire protection problems but
who do not already have knowledge of the over-
all geography, climate, economic values, and
the fire control ‘picture’; the second audience
is made up of practicing foresters who wish to
gain specific information based on fire weather,
behavior, statistics, and control data for fire re-
search, fire control planning, and fire suppres-
sion purposes. Interior Alaska has a great many
resources that deserve a much higher level of
protection than they have been receiving. In
order to protect a land adequately, much knowl-
edge must be had about the enemy— in this
case, fire.The geography and climate of the area
are described here in terms of their significance
to fire control. Analysis of climate, fire behavior,
and fire statistics over the past several years
should help establish normals against which
future fire seasons and fire control actions can be
measured; also, it may help shape the type and
size of fire detection and control organization
deemed necessary to protect the resources to an
extent commensurate with their values. For those
who wish to delve into statistics,.the appendix
contains the basic information from which most
of the charts and tables in this report were de-
rived,
The authors wish to point out that it is not
their intent to draw major conclusions from the
information presented nor to set forth a compre-
hensive research program, but to put under one
cover the major facets of wild fires in Interior
Alaska. Researchers can utilize the information
in this publication for formulating research pro-
grams; resource managers should find this ma-
terial beneficial in fulfilling their fire control
planning and suppression responsibilities.
The bulk of the statistical information is for
the period 1950 through 1958; however, a few
references as late as 1961 do occur. Some items
of information were gleaned from conversations
and general listening and reading; such informa-
tion cannot easily be referenced nor substantiat-
ed, and can even be erroneous. The authors have
attempted to minimize these sources and they
do apologize if misleading information still re-
mains in the text.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Literature pertinent to forest fire control in
Interior Alaska is scarce. Most of the available
references that bear on some facet of fire re-
search and control are specifically referred to in
appropriate chapters. However, some publica-
tions that may have only general application
to the problems at hand are mentioned here.
Aboriginal and white man share jointly the
responsibility for the tremendous burned areas in
Interior Alaska. Aboriginal man had no easy
way of starting a fire; so when he once had one
burning, he was loath to put it out. Extinguishing
a fire also was quite a chore as tools were very
primitive and much hard work was required.
Early man had many uses for fire, the more
prevalent being communication by smoke signals,
hunting by driving game into pockets or into the
water by setting fires, fighting hostile tribes by
advancing firelines, and combating insect pests;
in fact, it has been said that mosquitoes are the
cause of more forest fires than any other one
thing. Clearing the forest for easier travel and
obtaining dry fuel wood were other common
reasons for setting fires (Lutz 1959).
The white man set fires for many of the
same reasons as the aboriginals, but he also
had reasons of his own: to accelerate growth of
grass for livestock, to clear crop land, to see
rock surfaces better when prospecting, to remove
vegetative cover for strip mining, to clear road
and railroad rights-of-way, and just to see fire
burn. Carelessness and indifference by both
aboriginal and white man have resulted in keep-
ing timberland from progressing to climax status.
The militarily strategic location of Alaska,
and the Nation's reliance upon air defense have
prompted a large number of meteorological re-
search projects during the past decade or more.
Information gathered for forecasters particularly
interests fire research personnel because of the
wealth of data on air circulation, winds, pressure
distribution, and storm patterns, as described by
Arctic Weather Central, 11th Weather Squadron
(1950); U.S. Weather Bureau, Climate and Crop
Weather Division (1943); and Elmendorf Fore-
cast Center Headquarters (1953). Use of the cold
polar lows, as studied by Reed and Tank (1956)
is important to fire-weather forecasting, particu-
larly in predicting the effect of upper lows as
summer storms move along the fringe of the
Arctic land mass. Reed's work (1958, 1959)
points up the importance of atmospheric influ-
ence on the whole fire season and on individual
fires.
This Nation has a large inventory of wood
for lumber and fiber products. By 1975 the de-
mand will come close to the available supply;
by 2000 the demand will far exceed the supply
unless better forestry practices are employed or
vast new sources of timber are found. Three-
fourths of the commercial forest land in the
United States is privately owned, and 86 percent
of the ownership is in tracts of 100 acres or less.
The anticipated rate of gross national product
increase, and likewise timber demands, is
greater than the population increase because the
standard of living is expected to increase. At
present there is no excess of commercial forest
lands; less will be available in the future upon
which to grow a greater amount of timber (U.S.
Forest Service 1958).
Protection of the Alaskan forests from fire
is an essential feature of all future planning.
Protection and management of our extensive
present and potential timber resource of Interior
Alaska may provide that extra wood and fiber
necessary to get us ‘over the hump.”
Interior Alaskan forest resources are now
being carefully surveyed by photographic tech-
niques. The major problem is determining the
potential timber type on formerly forested land
and also differentiating between land that is
capable of producing industrial wood and land
that is not. Lutz and Caporaso (1958) consider
forest land classification indicators from two pri-
mary standpoints — vegetation and topographic
situations. The completed survey and map proj-
ect may serve as a basis for broad-scale fuel
type classification.
When speaking of wildlife population and
distribution and forest cover, Alaska has been
referred to as a continuum of edge. ‘‘The forest
wildlife of Alaska is truly more a product of the
edge, transition types, forest line, and timber
line than of specific forest types . . . the ranges
of various species of wildlife are neither distinct
nor constant for forest type’ (Nelson 1960, p.
461). The 2-million-acre Kenai National Moose
Range, managed by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries
and Wildlife, becomes one of silvicultural manip-
ulations to retard the succession from birch-
aspen to climax spruce stands, and to convert
mature forests of both types by mechanical,
chemical, and controlled burning methods into
young hardwood growth essential for maximum
production of browse, The story of reindeer dif-
fers from that of the multitude of other game
species in that the reindeer is an introduced
species (as are bison at Big Delta and elk on
Afognak Island). Some 1,300 head were trans-
planted from Siberia during the period 1890-
1902. The number increased to 1 million by
1936, but dwindled to 26,000 by 1950. Ten
years later the herd had made a modest increase
to about 38,000. During this long period over-
grazing and fire caused serious deterioration of
reindeer feeding sites; recovery of this lichen
range, under close protection, may require 20 to
40 years (Heintzleman 1936; Zumwalt 1960;
Palmer and Rouse 1945).
Objectives of fire research and fire control
management in much of Canada are similar to
those for Interior Alaska. Canada is divided into
13 protective zones, within which acceptable
average annual burning rates have been calcu-
lated for experimental, recreational, productive
and nonproductive forest areas, and for non-
forested areas. Twenty-eight productive forest
types are recognized. The burned area objectives
take into account values requiring protection and
factors that affect the difficulty of protection
(Beall 1949).
Fire research personnel in Canada are
studying many phases of fire behavior and con-
trol. Proposed expansion of programs along the
following lines will complement anticipated re-
search in Interior Alaska: study of fuel burning
potentials, fuel type classification, drought index
tables, improved detection methods, air and
ground application of improved retardants, and
an integral economic study of fire suppression
efforts in Canada (Besley 1959).
One might assume that in older established
countries like Sweden, where the economy of the
Nation has leaned heavily on its timber supply,
the fire control organization would be highly
developed and efficient; but this is not neces-
sarily true. Methods and even concepts of fire
control must change with times. The Swedes
have found that it is difficult to compare data
spread over a several-year period when knowl-
edge and accuracy are much better at the end
than at the beginning of the period (Stromdahl
1956 and 1959). Much the same is true for the
data analyzed and presented in this publication.
SUMMARY
Interior Alaska’s forest resources have
great potential value — a fact that received little
recognition until after World War Il. One million
acres out of the 225 million acres protected burn
over annually. Too little is known about the
special fire problem in high latitude northern
forests. Analysis of climate, fire behavior, and
fire statistics over the past several years should
help establish normals against which future fire
seasons and fire control actions can be meas-
ured; also, it may help shape the type and size
of fire detection and control organization deemed
necessary to protect the resources to an extent
commensurate with their values.
Lutz and Uggla are recognized leaders in
research pertaining to the fire ecology of high
latitude forested areas, and have contributed
substantially to a better understanding of the
forest fire situation in Interior Alaska. The im-
portance of Alaska to national defense prompted
the military services to sponsor extensive meteor-
ological and climatological research. Some of
their work involved studies of weather circula-
tion patterns that affect not only Interior Alaska
but the entire continent. The resume’ of literature
in this publication by no means accounts for the
total amount of material written on matters that
affect forest fire research and control in Interior
Alaska, but it does indicate the type of work
that has been done.
The predicted increase in U.S. population
will impose a terrific strain on the supply of wood
products by the year 2000 according to recent
studies. The large volumes of wood fiber ma-
terial available in Interior Alaska will be needed
to help meet the demands by that time. Forty
million acres of commercial forest land contain
180 billion board feet of wood and yield, at
present, an estimated net growth of 4 billion
board feet. Much of this commercial forest land
is capable of producing more than 10,000 board
feet of timber per acre.
Commercial use of fish and wildlife is a
$100 million industry; it can ill afford fire-caused
stream siltation with its resultant reduction of
oxygen and plant life. Expenditures by sports-
men and recreationists now exceed $20 million
per year; tourists like to see forests of green
trees, not snags or retrogressed sites. The serv-
ices industry likewise benefits from contented
tourists. The well-being of the wildlife resource
depends upon healthy forest environment under
adequate protection. A period of 40 to 100 years
is often required for caribou and reindeer range
to recover from fire. Fur quality is much reduced
in burned-over country. Many of the Nation's
duck and geese originate in Alaska; destruction
of their eggs and nesting grounds reduces the
hunting potential in the western half of the
United States.
Mining operations, still important in Alaska,
must have a constant flow of water, with neither
flooding nor drought, for their ventures to be
economically successful. Interested potential in-
vestors tend to shy away from establishing busi-
ness or industry where a continuous source of
raw material cannot be reasonably assured and
protected. Well-cared-for watersheds are neces-
sary for all resource development and mainte-
nance. Aircraft use for defense, profit, or pleas-
ure requires smoke-free skies. Airborne fire con-
trol operations in particular cannot succeed when
the sky is full of smoke.
No reliable means of determining intangible
loss from fire has yet been developed. Even the
full impact of fire on tangible assets of timber,
forage, and improvements is sometimes difficult
to ascertain. Research and development must be
aimed at establishing and maintaining standards
of fire control commensurate with the needs for
industrial, recreational, and personal security.
Alaska’s 586,000 square miles make it by
far the largest State in the Union. Geographi-
cally, the peninsula of Alaska varies from a
southern coastline of precipitous ice-packed
mountains, to vast flood plains along the Bering
Sea, to extensive interior valleys separated by
rolling hills. The State can be divided by geo-
graphic formations into seven distinct divisions.
Southeastern Alaska Jies along the coast south-
east of longitude 141° W. to the end of American
ownership south of Ketchikan. The Alaska Range
separates Cook Inlet, Copper River, and South
Coast Divisions from the others and confines
them to the maritime climatic influence. West
Central and Bristol Bay Divisions are made up of
hills and broad flood plains and open out onto
the Bering Sea. The Brooks Range separates the
Arctic Drainage Division from the rest of the
State. The broad valleys of the landlocked In-
terior Basin embrace most of the Yukon, the up-
per Kuskokwim, and the Tanana River drainages.
The movement of high and low pressure
systems over the northern Pacific and the Alaskan
mainland areas influences the climatic conditions
experienced in the several climatic regions of
Alaska. Summertime heating of the land surface
of the interior under the influence of long days
causes a relatively low pressure while pressure
builds up over the cool waters of the North Pa-
cific. As a result, weather becomes warm, some-
times hot, with occasional rains. Climatically,
the State is divided into four general zones: the
Maritime Zone consists of the coastline from
southeastern Alaska through the Aleutian penin-
sula; the arc farther inland, but extending along
the Bering Sea, constitutes the Transition Zone;
the great Interior Basin is called the Continental
Zone because of its definite continental climatic
characteristics; and the Arctic Drainage Zone is
one of dominant Arctic influences.
Climate of the Maritime Zone is character-
ized by small variations in summer temperature,
high humidities, high fog frequency, consider-
able cloudiness, and abundant precipitation. The
Transition Zone receives considerably less pre-
cipitation than the Maritime Zone. Thunder-
storms are common in the Copper River portion.
Winds in this zone are generally light, but locally
strong and erratic. The Continental Zone is set
apart from the others by topographic barriers.
Summertime temperatures may reach into the
high 90's; annual precipitation in some localities
is as little as 6 inches. The Arctic Zone is not
important to fire control activity. Precipitation
and temperature are both low. Average wind-
speeds, however, are relatively high. The sun's
rays in this extremely high latitude cause little
surface heating.
Data from 18 weather stations throughout
Interior Alaska were analyzed for the period
1950-58 to determine the weather regimes under
which fires burn and control action is taken.
Precipitation generally decreases from the south
to the north and increases from April through
August. Average afternoon temperatures in-
crease and relative humidities decrease from the.
Anchorage area northward towards the Fair-
banks-Fort Yukon area, causing fuels to become
progressively drier. Humidities are lower in May
and June than in July and August. The length
of day increases with latitude; Fort Yukon has
nearly a month of continuous daylight. As ex-
pected, winds in the afternoon are stronger than
those in the morning; winds in May are stronger
than those in July. Proximity to glaciers lying in
long, deep canyons tends to increase the force
and irregularity of windspeed and direction.
Cloud ceilings are generally above 1,000 feet
during May to early July, but become lower
more frequently during the rest of the summer.
Smoke and haze become increasingly detriment-
al to firefighting activities after the end of June.
Permafrost is more than 1,000 feet thick in the
extreme north of the State but is nonexistent in
the southern portion; the thick layer of mosses
and lichens insulates the soil and retards its
thawing; roots remain cold late into the spring
and tend to delay the start of vegetative growth;
the resultant late dormancy may cause fuels to
remain dry much later into the early summer
than one might normally expect.
Since Alaska has no fuel type classification
system, fire behavior is described according to
its relative violence in various general cover
types. As in continental United States, fire be-
comes more active when it travels through finely
divided fuels. Mosses, lichens, and spruce
branches extending to the ground provide a
nearly unlimited path of fine fuels through which
fires may advance. Each of several major cover
types presents various fire behavior possibilities.
Birch, aspen, and cottonwood stands do not
normally carry fire rapidly. Increase in the
spread rate of fire is closely associated with in-
creased ratio of spruce to hardwoods. Rate of
spread is most rapid in black spruce because of
the combined horizontal and vertical continuity
of fuel in this cover type. Light burns do not
often cause severe type retrogression, but severe
single burns or repeated mild burns do. An
empirical table groups expected rates of fire
spread in major cover types into fire classes.
Fire-danger rating was not used in Interior
Alaska prior to 1956, nor were there any data
available from which to develop a suitable sys-
tem. The need for a guide to help fire control
officers do a more competent fire management
job led to establishment of the Intermountain
System in Interior Alaska. Use of this system
has accomplished two objectives: (1) to serve as
a fire management guide, and (2) to obtain re-
search data to be used in improving fire-danger
rating techniques and in making local modifica-
tions to a national uniform system. Fire-weather
factors are not as severe as those in continental
United States, but rates of spread in Interior
Alaska may approach those known to occur in
many of the more southerly States. The diurnal
fluctuation of fire-danger rating factors is less in
Interior Alaska than in northern Idaho; this indi-
cates that perhaps extended periods of moder-
ately severe weather produce the same condi-
tions in terms of fire behavior as a short number
of hours of very severe weather. Establishing
fire-weather stations and using information from
them was a long step forward, but the 14 sta-
tions in operation by 1960 were still grossly in-
adequate for intensive fire control management
purposes. Measurements from these stations in-
dicate that burning indexes are highest in May
and June; in Montana and Idaho they are high-
est in July and August. These burning indexes,
along with climatological information, show why
the greatest fire load is in May and June.
Forest fires have burned in Interior Alaska
from time immemorial. Until recent years, nearly
all fires in the State were thought to have been
man caused. Analysis of all fires reported dur-
ing the 9-year period 1950-58 revealed much
valuable information. Individual fire reports
show that lightning causes about one-fourth of
all fires and that these lightning fires account
for three-fourths of the acreage burned. Sixty-
two percent of all public domain land protected
by the Bureau of Land Management is in Alaska,
or 27 percent of all land under organized protec-
tion in the entire United States. Reports show
that on the average 253 fires burn 1.1 million
acres annually, with an average area per fire of
4,400 acres. This is compared to 99,848 fires
burning 3 million acres, or 30 acres burned per
fire, on all other land under protection in the
rest of the United States. The number of reported
fires per million acres protected is 1.1 in Interior
Alaska compared to 168 in the rest of the United
States.
Records indicate that if a fire in Interior
Alaska is not controlled while its area is less
than 300 acres, it may and often does spread
to several thousand or even to several hundred
thousand acres. Seventy-four percent of all fires
in Interior Alaska burn in the highly flammable
spruce and tundra types. The final size of a
lightning fire averages 10 times the size of a
man-caused fire primarily because lightning fires
are common in the Interior Basin, but detection
and access are both difficult. During the period
of analysis 33 percent of lightning fires and 9
percent of man-caused fires never receive any
control action. These figures include many fires
extinguished by nature before action could be
taken; also, action is not taken on fires on pri-
vate or entry land unless real danger to adjacent
public lands develops. Fires on which no action
was taken account for 35 percent of acreage
burned by lightning fires and 68 percent of acre-
age burned by man-caused fires. Eighty percent
of all lightning fires occur in June and July; but
73 percent of the acreage burned by these light-
ning fires is burned in June. Fifty-seven percent
of man-caused fires occur in May and June; but
70 percent of all acreage burned by these man-
caused fires is burned in May. In general, as
the total number of fires increases, the number of
Class E fires (more than 300 acres) also increases,
and the number of Class A fires (less than one-
fourth acre) decreases; early overloading of a
small suppression force may account in part for
this.
Most man-caused fires occur near popula-
tion centers, as would be expected. More than a
usual number of reported lightning fires also
burns in a somewhat similar pattern; the distri-
bution will no doubt appear different when
better detection and reporting procedures are
developed.
Southeastern Alaska has not been treated
in this analysis because fire conditions there are
not as critical as in the Interior. An average of
26 fires — virtually all man-caused — occurs
annually in southeastern Alaska and burns about
638 acres, or 25 acres per fire, compared to 4,400
acres per fire in Interior Alaska. However, the
fire potential in southeastern Alaska is increas-
ing as logging activity increases.
Virtually no specific data were available
describing the behavior of wildfires in Alaska
prior to 1958. During 1958 and 1959, fire be-
havior teams collected data on the fireline from
19 fires. The teams measured rates of spread,
weather factors, and fuel variations, and ob-
served their interrelationships. The primary ques-
tion to be solved was, “Why do fires in Interior
Alaska get so large so fast?’’ The most probable
explanation of the behavior of seven of these
fires is briefly summarized below:
1. Healy: High winds resulting from topo-
graphic features.
2. Murphy Dome: Broken topography, high
burning index, thunderstorms, and atmospheric
instability.
3. Kenai Lake: Steep topography causing
diurnal wind reversals; frontal movement pass-
ing over area.
4. Colorado Creek: Highest burning in-
dexes of all fires studied; topography altered
winds.
5. Lake 606: Strong winds, thunderstorm
downdrafts.
6. Stony River: Unbroken horizontal fuel
continuity; frontal movement.
7. Huggins Island W-10: Rough topog-
raphy; variable and gusty surface winds due to
atmospheric instability.
Data from these fires indicate that nearly
all extreme behavior can be explained qualita-
tively but not quantitatively at present. Impor-
tant problems in fire control are: (1) forecasting
fire-weather conditions, (2) predetermining fire
behavior, and (3) determining the influence of
different fuels on rate of spread under various
weather regimes.
Organized forest fire control in Interior
Alaska began in 1939 with an appropriation of
$37,500. The high potential value of the timber
resource is now receiving more nearly adequate
recognition; but even so, a comparison of the fire
control organization in Interior Alaska with that
of Region 1 of the U.S. Forest Service (Montana,
northern Idaho, northeastern Washington, and
northwestern South Dakota) reveals there is still
a long way to go before an adequate fire con-
trol organization is achieved. The Bureau of
Land Management in Interior Alaska protects
seven times as much area, has one-fourth as
many fires, and fights them with 11 percent
as many regular fire personnel as Region 1.
Alaska has only 8 percent as many people per
square mile to draw upon for fighting fires in
its vast, inaccessible territory. The annual burned
area is 250 times as large as that in Region 1,
or 36 times as great per million acres protected.
Major operational bases and warehouse
facilities located at Anchorage and Fairbanks are
augmented by several district centers and guard
stations. Since the source of supply of many
basic firefighting needs is many thousands of
miles away from these two cities and economical
delivery of them is very slow, successful dis-
patching of men and equipment is dependent
upon close planning many months in advance. A
highly reliable communication system is manda-
tory for operating such a widely spread fire con-
trol system. Radio equipment is being updated
and the system expanded. Firefighting crews
are hard to find, but crews of native Indians and
Eskimos from small villages have proved to be
excellent firefighters. Some tools and equipment
commonly used elsewhere in the United States
can be used effectively in Interior Alaska, but
specially developed tools are needed to obtain
maximum performance from the few available
firefighters. Use of heavy fireline equipment is
limited to dry slopes near roads.
Aircraft, both government and private, are
being used increasingly for detection, transporta-
tion of personnel, smokejumping, supply, recon-
naissance, application of retardants, and general
administration. Use of helicopters is closely co-
ordinated with other air and ground attack pro-
cedures. Foot travel is impossible over much of
Interior Alaska because of bogs, meandering
rivers, lakes, uneven terrain, and long distances.
Early detection of fires is a major problem
since no fixed lookouts exist in Interior Alaska,
and aerial patrol consists of one World War II
pursuit-type airplane and intermittent use of
other smaller craft during critical periods. Re-
ports from commercial and military aircraft help,
but since large areas are seen only occasionally,
many fires cover hundreds of acres before being
discovered and other fires are never seen until
they have become extinguished from natural
circumstances. Procedures must be developed
for detecting, tracking, and reporting thunder-
storms since they are responsible for three-
fourths of the total area burned annually.
Attack time is being shortened by dropping
retardants from planes and immediately follow-
ing them by smokejumpers. Helicopters and
ground forces are quickly moved in so that
jumpers can return to base to become available
for new fires. Forty-four percent of all reported
fires start farther than 100 miles from head-
quarters. Speeding up of detection will pay off
well by reducing the size of fires and the cost of
suppression. Size class of fires increases as the
length of time between discovery and control
increases. Small fires are controlled within 2
hours from attack; but nearly half of all fires that
cover more than 300 acres require more than 3
days to control. In the spruce type, 70 percent
of small fires are only smoldering when at-
tacked, whereas 47 percent of large fires are
crowning at time of attack. The increasing vio-
lence of fires as their size increases again illus-
trates the need for early discovery and attack.
Total cost of fire protection in 1958 was
1.01 cents per acre as compared to 0.80 cent per
acre on land in other States protected by the
Bureau of Land Management; but Interior
Alaska's burned area on 225 million protected
acres averaged nearly seven times that for other
States on 138 million protected acres for the
period of 1950-58. The long-term goal of an-
nual allowable burn is a maximum of 100,000
acres.
Several methods for using fire in disposing
of land-clearing debris have been studied and
some guides developed, but none have been
found completely suitable for universal adop-
tion. As yet untapped are means for fully using
fire as an effective tool in attaining forest man-
agement objectives. Research in economics,
forestry, and fire control operations is critically
needed to help strike a balance between the
strength of detection, presuppression, and sup-
pression, and the most favorable overall cost of
protection. In fire control planning and suppres-
sion, the primary factors that influence fire size
and difficulty of control — weather, fuels, and
topography — must at all times be kept in the
forefront; no fire protection plan can be complete
without incorporating the probable effect of
these major influences.
CHAPTER 2
VALUES AT STAKE
TIMBER RESOURCES
Volumes have been published during the
past few years describing the population explo-
sion in the United States and showing how it
will increase demands for all types of manufac-
tured products. The demand for and the avail-
able supply of wood products during the next 40
or more years will have to be reckoned with now
if a balance is to be obtained.
The recent Timber Resource Review empha-
sizes the fact that national demands can be met
only if better and more ingenious forestry prac-
tices are instituted and utilization is made of
large volumes of wood not presently usable or
available.
Statements in the Timber Resource Review
repeatedly note that the trend during the first
half of the 20th century has been from a pre-
dominantly lumber consumption economy toward
a pulpwood consumption economy. During the
last half century, total consumption of lumber
(boards, dimension stock, etc.) has not changed,
but the population increase has about halved
the per capita use. On the other hand, total
pulpwood consumption has increased about
twelvefold, causing a per capita consumption
increase of about sixfold.
One way to help insure adequate timber
supplies for the United States through the next
50 years is to increase utilization of a vast tract
of forest land hitherto virtually untapped; name-
ly, Interior Alaska. Timber resources of Interior
Alaska were not included either in the statistical
summaries or in analytical discussions in the
Timber Resource Review because accurate infor-
mation was almost nonexistent. Out of approxi-
mately 300 million acres of Interior Alaska land
administered by the Bureau of Land Manage-
ment, 120 million acres is forested; one-third of
this forested land, or 40 million acres, is con-
sidered to be of commercial quality. Of this, 4
million acres or 10 percent is presently consid-
ered accessible from towns, roads, or railroads.
Many persons believe that Interior forests
are slow-growing, stunted Arctic stands that
have little or no value. Taylor (1956) has shown
that this is not so. The estimated annual net
growth of 20 cubic feet per acre can be increased
considerably under good management. Well-
protected managed stands should produce 3,900
cubic feet, or 15,500 board feet, of timber per
acre at a rotation age of 160 years; this indicates
a.good margin of operability, since stands of
3,000 cubic feet in Maine and 1,500 cubic feet
in Finland are now supporting pulp industries.!
Canada has built a major pulp industry upon
the same species of white spruce that grows in
Interior Alaska. The timber economy of northern
European countries is based upon small diameter
spruce and hardwood forests growing under
much the same conditions as exist in Interior
Alaska. Perhaps when many of the present
economic problems of labor, power, accessibil-
ity, and distance to market can be solved, a
thriving pulp industry can be built upon this vast
store of timber.
Interior Alaska holds many attractions for
an increased wood fiber industry. Timberlands
in large blocks no longer exist in mainland
United States. The timber in Alaska's interior
probably will have little value on the export
lumber market because of high costs and low
lumber grades, but Alaska's pulp can sell profit-
ably on the world markets. Southeastern Alaska
has already benefited by the establishment of
two pulpmills since 1954.
Any proposal to increase productivity must
be accompanied by a plan to increase protection
of the investment. History and personal observa-
tions indicate that 80 percent of the forest land
in Interior Alaska has been burned over some-
time during the past 70 years. No large business
concern can afford to invest 25 to 50 million dol-
lars in a pulpmill without reasonable assurance
that the raw material will be protected and kept
available during the long number of years the
mill must operate. Today, fire is a major danger
to pulp stands, and one fire can wipe out many
years’ backlog of raw material required for oper-
ating a multimillion-dollar mill.”
1More recent plot data indicate 140 years is a better suited
rotation age, and an optimum volume per acre would be
somewhere between 10,000 and 15,000 board feet.
2The cost of one mill proposed for Alaska will be five times
the price the United States paid for Alaska in 1867.
Figure 1. — Typical small sawmill, Circle.
Extensive stand of Alaskan timber.
Figure 2.
10
FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES®
The full value of the wildlife resource to the
residents of Alaska is greater than is immedi-
ately apparent. Wildlife plays an important part
in the economy of Alaska as judged by the
criteria of money, recreational use, time, employ-
ment, and social welfare. The value of fish
shipped from Alaska since its acquisition has re-
paid its original purchase price of $7,200,000
more than 300-fold; the value of furs, 30 times
over. During 1957, some 59,510 persons spent
$17,018,500 to purchase hunting and fishing
licenses; they spent 981,800 man-days enjoying
their sport. In 1958, tourists spent $18,165,000
in Alaska. If one-fourth of that amount was at-
tracted by wildlife, $4.5 million was expended
for the enjoyment of the wildlife.
The four basic industries, numbers of per-
sons employed, and the raw value of products
in dollars for fiscal year 1957 were:
Persons Raw
Industry employed value
Fish and Wildlife - 60,000 $ 90,115,739
Agriculture 750 4,231,134
Forestry 500 6,914,000
Mining 1,991 23,408,000
$124,668,873
FISHING RESOURCE
Of the 60,000 persons employed in some
business related to fish and wildlife, nearly
24,000, or 40 percent, were engaged in com-
mercial fishing. Salmon is the primary commer-
cial species. The entire packing industry depends
upon a successful spawn and healthy, thriving
young fish that return to the sea to complete
their life cycle.
Fire-damaged watersheds deteriorate
through the action of the natural elements. Soil
becomes unstable, and overland flow following
heavy precipitation washes it into streams; the
combined effect of oxygen reduction and destruc-
tion of streambed algae and other necessary
minute food sources by scouring can render fish
habitat untenable.
3Most of the statistical information for this section was
obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Buckley
1957).
11
Any destroyed streambed ruins not only the
current year's salmon spawn, but also eliminates
proper grounds for spawning during the next
several years. Rebuilding a depleted salmon
population takes many years, even after a
stream is again conditioned for proper spawn-
ing. Any decline in fish population reduces
the catch for the cannery and the income to both
the industry and the State.
USFS
Figure 3. —— Salmon thrive best in waters from stable
watersheds.
WILDLIFE RESOURCE
The annual recreational value of Alaska's
wildlife runs into substantial figures. Expendi-
tures by residents of Alaska amount to 59 per-
cent of the $21 million spent, including an esti-
mate of $4.5 million worth of esthetic value.
Some of the most important nesting grounds
for wild ducks and geese are in Interior Alaska,
especially along the lower Yukon River. Since
these nesting grounds support vast numbers of
migratory fowl that use the Pacific and mountain
Figure 4. — Sport fishing is a major attraction.
id
Ah
it.
Sons)
w- ¥ :
P “tap!
i?
oe
Figure 5. — Big-game hunting nets meat, sport, and revenue.
12
flyways, bird hunters throughout central and
western United States depend upon their well-
being. Fires destroy the protective covering; they
burn nests and eggs and often kill fledglings
and even adults. Although specific data are not
available, fires along the lower Yukon River in
the disastrous season of 1957 must have caused
tremendous losses of eggs, fledglings, moulting
ducks, and even mature birds.
Forest fires damage wildlife habitat, but
repeated burns destroy it completely. At least
10 years is required for vegetation and cover to
reappear in quantities and form sufficient to ac-
commodate furbearing animals. From 40 to
more than 100 years may be required for a
caribou and reindeer lichen range to regain its
optimum carrying capacity. Uggla (1958a) drew
similar conclusions after intensive ecological
studies in Sweden. Three hundred years may
elapse before the more palatable and valuable,
but least common, species recover to a point
where they can be safely grazed.
Some animal species, for instance the mar-
ten, leave the country permanently after their
habitat has been destroyed by fire. Furbearers
appear to produce poorer quality pelts if they
live in burned areas. The Hudson Bay Company
pays premium prices for furs that were trapped
in unburned country.
RECREATIONAL RESOURCES
Recreation is a rapidly growing major in-
dustry in Alaska. It probably will produce an
annual income of $100 million to Alaska within
the next few years. Tourists come in increasing
numbers every year; and they come earlier and
stay later than formerly. They come primarily to
see the country and enjoy the beauties of nature
— the mountains, forests and rivers, and the
novelty of glaciers and unfamiliar species of
wildlife.
The map showing frequency of man-caused
fires (fig. 57) shows why many tourists are ex-
tremely disappointed in what they see along the
primary highways and along the Alaska Rail-
road route. Frequency of these fires is highest
along major travel routes. Some have resulted
from carelessness and some from road construc-
tion activities. Prevention and control of fires
in these areas are imperative so that the country
can reestablish itself to timber.
Recreational value should by no means be
considered as confined to the tourist trade. On
weekends and holidays and during vacations,
Alaskan families fill the roads as they drive to
the woods, the lakes, or the numerous picnic and
fishing spots. An average family thinks nothing
of getting into the car, or even airplane, and
traveling hundreds of miles on a weekend just
USFS & WLS
Figure 6. — Nesting grounds need protection.
13
BLM
eee nae
ie:
USFS
Figure 7. — Picnicking, boating, and spectacular scenery attract recreationists.
14
to enjoy the scenic beauties of the State. People
live in Alaska not only to earn their livelihood,
but because they are enthusiastic lovers of the
outdoors; so they are vitally interested in the
maintenance and enhancement of the outdoor
recreation resource.
Fire damage to recreational facilities cannot
be estimated accurately in dollars. The fisher-
man, the hunter, the camper, and the picnicker
all suffer in an intangible personal way. Only
rough estimates can be made to determine how
much more traffic would occur if all the land
were productive and beautiful. Many categories
of business are affected by both the short-term
and long-term results of fire. A few of these are:
lodging, food, and automotive repair services;
aircraft charter and guide business; and photo-
graphic and sporting goods merchants.
MINING
Mining has been one of the three major in-
dustries in Alaska for the last 7 decades. Gold
stimulated rapid development of mining in the
late 1800's and early 1900's. Most gold mining
in western and Interior Alaska is placer mining,
and is completely dependent upon water to
process gravel and remove the minerals. High
costs of production have seriously reduced vol-
ume of the mining industry, but it still is far
from being eliminated; in 1957, mining was
second high in economic value to the State —
wildlife was first (Buckley 1957).
Placer mining requires removal of over-
burden and gravels down to bedrock in order to
make the mineral-bearing strata accessible to
shovels, dozers, draglines, and other equipment.
Preparation of an area, including the cutting of
bedrock drains and digging of holes prior to
actual mining, is extremely expensive. Floods,
always a threat to mining operations, may fill
the cuts and cause loss of equipment, work, and
time during the short field season which runs
usually from early June until late September.
Mining operations often produce silting,
which damages rivers and smaller streams.
Mining may also be detrimental to stability of
individual watersheds. Forest fires can cause
any such potentially serious situation to become
disastrous.
15
Figure 8.— Commercial recreation area near Fairbanks.
Oil and gas production is at the threshold
of becoming big business. Much of the current
exploration, well drilling, and pipeline construc-
tion is in timbered country. Protection from large
fires is imperative for the safety of workmen as
well as for the large investments. Income to the
State from oil and gas leases is already sub-
stantial. By law, the State receives 90 percent
of the Federal revenue, which for the first half
of 1959 amounted to $4-1/3 million.
. : ee :
eee
Figure 9. — Gold mining operation, near Fairbanks.
Figure 10. — Alaska’s first commercial oil well.
WATERSHEDS
Wherever located, an undamaged water-
shed performs the same useful function: it catches
rain or snow and allows the water to percolate
into the soil; thus, it controls streamflow in an
orderly fashion. A good watershed slows the
flow of water into streams during the spring and
early summer. It also acts as a storage basin and
allows water to flow into streams slowly during
the season when precipitation is low.
Many effects of fire on characteristics of
soils and watersheds ond on species distribution
are similar to what is expected in more southerly
States. Interior Alaskan soils are generally shal-
Fine-textured soils become poorly aerated
and cooled; organic matter tends to remain unin-
low.
corporated in the mineral soil and to rest on the
soil as a mantle. The moss and lichen cover is
a good insulator in the summer; its removal
causes a lowering of the permafrost level.
Though fire may not alter soil texture and struc-
ture, it does reduce the infiltration rate and in-
crease overland flow.
Not all ecological effects of uncontrolled
fire are detrimental to the environment. Thermal
effects on soil temperature are generally favor-
able, as are the chemical changes. Nutrients that
16
are normally locked up on the cold forest floor
are liberated for assimilation by new plant
growth.
Interior Alaska has one watershed feature
that exists nowhere else in the United States:
permafrost. Changes in permafrost resulting
from forest fires are discussed further in chapter
3. Briefly, fire destroys the moss insulation and
permits warm air and solar radiation to melt the
permafrost. The earth on slopes often moves or
sags, trees fall over, and the water table drops.
Evaporation excessively dries the soil surface
after the permafrost level has been lowered; this
in turn defeats efforts at revegetation.
USFS
Figure 11. — This accelerated erosion started after surface
vegetation was burned; near Fairbanks.
"USFS
Figure 12. —— Irrigated farmlands depend on productive
watersheds; near Fairbanks.
USE OF AIRCRAFT
Alaskans are the most airminded people
in the world. On a per capita basis, they own
more aircraft and fly more people and freight
than any other population group. Airlines must
fulfill definitely scheduled flights; people depend
upon these flights to run on schedule so that they
can carry on necessary business. The State has
numerous charter aircraft companies, and an
astounding number of private aircraft operates
in the State. Some are used for pleasure, but
many are for business. These private planes
also must be able to fly when the need exists
so that their operators and owners can perform
their business. An article in a recent issue of the
Alaska Sportsman (1961, p. 27) stated, ‘There
are an estimated 900 private planes in Anchor-
age, 200 commercial aircraft, 300 private sea-
planes, and 50 commercial seaplanes. An esti-
mated 35 helicopters also register out of busy
Anchorage airports.’ When large fires occur,
the atmosphere becomes so smoked up that com-
mercial and private flying becomes nearly im-
possible.
Aircraft are essential to many firefighting
activities — detection, patrol, chemical attack,
smokejumping, crew transportation, helicopter
use, and servicing of fire crews. Grounding these
planes on account of reduced visibility due to
smoke sharply pyramids the fire problem. In
1957, smoke covered the entire Interior with such
a thick layer that virtually no aircraft operated
for days at a time. The only exception was that
a few Bureau of Land Management planes were
permitted to fly as an emergency measure to
service firefighting crews.
Location gives this State extremely strategic
importance in the defense of the rest of the
United States. Since aircraft are a major military
tool, planes dare not be grounded because of
smoke-filled air.
17
2), See : d mo Jt ee *
3 : Sig : > mrad ig: a < eee eo aie, es
é . ‘ : exe , v
yee CN CS NO asp a woe ae
oS MILT
new
Figure 13. —- Defense communication outposts must be pro-
tected from forest fires.
USFS
Figure 14. — A small portion of the Anchorage float plane
basin.
ro" a
ae x : ao, ae = = - a = == 4
dee be ee es Se Se 2 > -
Figure 16. — Alaskans travel on wings. \
‘ 18
ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES
No uniformly acceptable method for assign-
ing monetary values to damage by wildfire has
ever been developed. Most fire control agencies
use empirical formulas for estimating losses of
such tangible items as timber, forage, and im-
provements. But there is no reliable means of
estimating losses of such intangible values as
watershed, wildlife, recreation, and _ potential
industry. The final evaluation also depends on
several controlling factors such as severity of
burn, weather and fuel conditions at the time of
burn, topography, and even the time of year.
The Battelle Institute states in the conclu-
sion and recommendations of its report on the
cooperative forest fire control problem that no
statistically supportable method is now avail-
able for evaluating the impact of fire on natural
resources, and that further studies on the conse-
quences of wildfire to watersheds, including
downstream effects, should be encouraged
(Swager, Fetterman, and Jenkins 1958).
The annual reports of the Director of the
Bureau of Land Management show assigned
estimated damage from wildfire. For the years
1950-58 the average estimated dollar value of
damage amounted to approximately 10 cents
per acre in Alaska compared to 8.6 cents per
acre for all other land protected by BLM person-
nel.
Three questions arise: (1) How realistic are
the present damage estimates? (2) By how much
would damage be reduced if the expenditure
for protection were doubled or even quadrupled?
(3) How much research is warranted to help
bring these two figures into a proper economic
relationship, bearing in mind the values at stake
discussed earlier in this chapter?
19
Table 44 lists three categories of tangible
damage — timber, reproduction, and forage.
Since the money value of timber and reproduc-
tion in Interior Alaska is now only a potential
one, the value assigned to destroyed timber can
also be only potential. Persons concerned with
developing an assured future supply of wood
and fiber know that it is necessary to protect
the present crop, but without adequately devel-
oped procedures they cannot prove it in actual
dollars and cents.
Values for immediate loss of forage can be
computed within reasonable limits of accuracy. A
more difficult task is estimating the impact on
animals that have to graze on other ranges and
the hardship on local residents when the game
or reindeer that they depend upon for food move
out of their area.
Losses of homes, farm property, and busi-
ness establishments are both tragic and costly
to owners. Computation of monetary loss from
such misfortunes, however, is rather simple since
accepted methods of damage appraisal have
been used for many years and are available for
that class of property.
No one knows how much employment and
revenue may be lost because interested poten-
tial investors tend to shy away from establishing
businesses or industries in an area where a con-
tinuing source of raw material cannot be reason-
ably assured. This problem certainly exists or
will exist in the near future for the wood fiber
Research and de-
velopment must aim at establishing and main-
industry in Interior Alaska.
taining standards of fire control commensurate
with the need for industrial security.
BLM
— ee
EI AO, Sty
BLM
Figure 18. — More than money was destroyed here, near Fairbanks.
20
CHAPTER 3
GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE
From a fire control standpoint Alaska, like
most western States, has some portions that are
considered easy, some moderate, and some criti-
cal. What makes one area easy and another criti-
cal? Usually considered pertinent to this ques-
tion are the following factors: (1) The geographic
arrangement of the land in relation to elevations
and general weather patterns, (2) climatic con-
ditions, which are generally influenced by the
geographic pattern, (3) weather patterns on a
local and short-term basis, and (4) fuels, as in-
fluenced by all the above factors. Fuels are dealt
with in a separate chapter (ch. 4). The first two
factors are described in rather general terms to
help set the stage for more specific information
that follows in the remainder of the publication.
PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY
Alaska is by far the largest of the 50 States
—a vast expanse of land lying north of the Pa-
cific Ocean, separated from the larger land mass
of Siberia to the west by Bering Strait and joined
along the 141st meridian on the east to Yukon
Territory, Canada. Alaska contains 586,400
square miles (375,296,000 acres); about one-third
of this acreage is in the Interior Basin. Geo-
graphically, Alaska is divided into seven areas
— South Coast, Copper River Valley, Cook Inlet,
Bristol Bay, West Central, Arctic Drainage, and
the Interior Basin as drawn in figure 19.
SOUTH COAST
The Aleutian Islands and Southern and
Southeastern Coastal Areas combine to form a
1,500-mile crescent-shaped coastline; at some
points it is 120 miles in depth. At its eastern
extremity this area is mountainous, cut by a
great number of tidewater bays, sounds, inlets,
and fiords. Huge glaciers descend the mountain
passes and often flank these shoreline indenta-
tions. Mountaintops are above 5,000 feet and
several rise to heights of 10,000 to 15,000 feet.
The precipitous slopes of the mountains from
Kodiak Island eastward are mostly clothed to
heights of 1,000 to 3,000 feet by dense stands
of spruce, hemlock, and some cedar. The Alaska
Peninsula and adjacent islands southward from
Kodiak Island are devoid of forests, but are cov-
ered with luxuriant growth of native grasses.
21
About half of southeastern Alaska consists of
islands. Prince of Wales Island — the largest
— is 140 miles long by 40 miles wide. The
largest fresh-water streams in the area are the
Stikine and Taku Rivers, which rise in British
Columbia.
COPPER RIVER VALLEY
Copper River Valley is surrounded by four
mountain ranges varying in height from 4,600
to 17,000 feet. The Alaska Range forms the north
boundary, St. Elias the east, Chugach the south,
and the Talkeetna Range the west. Copper River
Valley is nearly 120 miles long and up to 50
miles wide. Icefields and glaciers are the main
sources of water for the Copper River. The basin
is a high plain with elevations as great as
2,500 feet above sea level. This valley is dotted
with numerous lakes surrounded by stands of
spruce and birch timber. Many areas within the
valley are covered by dense stands of native
grass and tundra species.
COOK INLET
Cook Inlet Division embraces most of the
Kenai Peninsula, the famous Matanuska Valley,
and the delta of the Susitna River. It is bordered
by the Alaska Range, and the Talkeetna and
Kenai Mountains. Elevation of the valley floor
varies from sea level to about 2,500 feet. Vege-
tation varies from rather luxuriant grasses and
some spruce and hardwoods on the Kenai Penin-
sula to heavy stands of spruce and some very
fine birch in the central and northern portions of
the Division.
BRISTOL BAY
Bristol Bay Division, nearly 500 miles long
by 180 miles wide, drains into the Bering Sea.
The Kuskokwim River is the largest river that
drains this area.
The coastal and valley portion is undulating
to rolling; its elevation varies from sea level to
nearly 2,000 feet. It is studded with hundreds
of lakes and potholes. On the northwest the
zone is bordered by the Kuskokwim Mountains
and on the south and east by the Aleutian Range.
These mountains vary from foothills to precipi-
tous peaks nearly 9,000 feet high.
The land is clothed with dense growths of
tundra and native grass species, but island-
fashion stands of spruce and birch timber are
scattered over it.
WEST CENTRAL
West Central Division embraces an area
480 miles by 300 miles with a coastline cut by
scores of bays into which several rivers and
creeks flow. The large delta formed from residue
carried by the Yukon and Kuskokwim Rivers,
which pass through more than 350 miles of this
area, contains a myriad of lakes and bogs.
The topography of this large land mass
generally consists of low flat muskeg bogs and
undulating hills, varying in height from near sea
level to 1,400 feet.
of the Seward Peninsula is mountainous and has
peaks rising to 3,800 feet.
ARCTIC DRAINAGE
However, the southern half
Arctic Drainage Division comprises all of the
area north of the Brooks Range Divide, the
Kotzebue Sound Area, and the Kobuk and No-
atak Rivers. Three-fourths of the 1,200-mile
shoreline is north of the Arctic Circle. The Kotze-
bue Sound Area is a low tideland delta sur-
rounded by gently rolling hills. Most of the land
up to 3,000 feet elevation is covered by moss,
lichens, brush, and grass, but some dense stands
of spruce occupy the most favorable edaphic
sites. The arctic slope is a high, rolling plateau,
gradually lowering to near sea level, where it is
dotted by numerous lakes, muskeg bogs, and
rivers. The Meade, Chipp, Colville, and Canning
Rivers have their sources in the plateau area of
the Endicott Mountains and flow northward into
the Arctic Ocean.
INTERIOR BASIN
Interior Basin embraces most of the Yukon
River drainage and the upper portion of the
Kuskokwim Valley. The Endicott and Philip Smith
Mountains, a part of the Brooks Range, delineate
the northern limits of the area; between these
and the Alaska Range lies the drainage basin of
the great Yukon River. The Alaska Range is
composed of peaks more than 10,000 feet above
sea level, including North America’s highest
peak, 20,300-foot Mount McKinley.
Major features of the Interior Basin Division
22
are the Yukon Flats on and near the Arctic Circle
and the adjacent mountains with elevations up to
6,000 feet. The Tanana River Valley, with an
area of about 24,000 square miles, lies north of
the Alaska Range, whose glaciers supply most of
the southern tributaries of the river. The upper
half of the valley is rough and broken, while the
lower portion has considerable level and gently
rolling country; some of it in the vicinity of
Fairbanks is adapted to agriculture. The upper
portion of the large Kuskokwim River Valley is
dotted by lakes and lesser rivers, many of which
are often bordered by timber stands to varying
widths. The intervening area is covered by
mosses, brush species, and native grasses. The
elevation of much of the valley area varies from
near sea level to only 2,300 feet.
CLIMATE
Climatically, Alaska is a land of dramatic
contrasts. Annette, near Ketchikan, in southeast
Alaska receives 97 inches of precipitation and
the temperatures may fall between 1° and 86° F.
But at Fort Yukon on the Arctic Circle, only 6,
inches of precipitation falls and the temperature
varies from —75° to 100° F. Information in this
chapter is confined chiefly to summertime condi-
tions within Interior Alaska.
The movement of these high and low pres-
(p. 4) brings different climatic
conditions through the State. Variation in tem-
perature, air moisture, precipitation, and the
geographic distribution of these factors is im-
portant to fire control, particularly during spring
and summer seasons (Kincer 1941).
sure regimes
Watson's (1959) study of Alaska climate
divides the State into four major zones (fig. 20)
that are actually consolidations of the seven geo-
graphic divisions outlined in figure 19:
1. Zone of dominant maritime influence.
2. Transition zone.
3. Dominant continental zone.
4. Arctic drainage zone.
Isolines of figures 21 through 27 show the
variation of precipitation during the spring and
summer months and the normal annual total. -
The reader should refer to these while studying
the ensuing climatic descriptions.
}
| ae
ait
fer penne
) oan BN
i Li oan
fe pushes
} \
}
/
| a
an OF
}
| pwiaw
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1; 250000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
oo aso ues
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
@ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
mm OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
# DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
& GUARD STATION
=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
= GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS
SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU.
CLIMATES OF THE STATES,
ALASKA. NO. 60-49
Sai ath
yaaa
S SD St a
he SPST Th
Figure 19
{
{
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1: 250.000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
San
hace DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
— LEGEND
@ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
® OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
# DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
% GUARD STATION
=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
ee ON ie Lee ew ee = GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS
ak eo
@t FORT YU 1S) oat eS es { SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU.
: Sees CLIMATES OF THE STATES,
ae : BS Ne ALASKA. NO. 60- 49
we O ®
Dees.
ES
@a/a
Caw 5 ,.
NA a ea
@# HOMER
2,
oot Nentye er
. ER AS ”
Bg SAC Nites
Figure 19
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR }
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY }
ALASKA |
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1.250 000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES.
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
_ LEGEND
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION We
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
GUARD STATION
=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
—— CLIMATOLOGICAL ZONES
SOURCE U.S. WEATHER BUREAU.
CLIMATES OF THE STATES,
ALASKA. NO. 60-49
Figure 20
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAI CE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1: 250 000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
DATUM. IS MEAW SEA LEVEL
— LEGEND
@ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
™ = =OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
& DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
®% GUARD STATION
he 7 ae BY re foe == PRIMARY HIGHWAY
eRe ae Tigo MSS oe Se ——CLIMATOLOGICAL ZONES
Pease noe) = a ae 5 et Wane OR rg. eee | SOURCE’ U.S. WEATHER BUREAU.
yp sp aie CE ee 7 ae eee! CLIMATES OF THE STATES,
Pict § eR sale : sy : \ ad ALASKA, NO. 60-49
Lea ee
& @LA E MINCHUMINA (oy
& PALME
@* ANCHORAGE
EE? sagpre
au me Hey
Uf 4
FEM
xe.
Gy
On
wid
UA
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1: 250.000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
nvlavit \ DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
| : @ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
ae DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
| (och Oa GUARD STATION
| ie == PRIMARY HIGHWAY
——— NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
APRIL
se SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU.
Velie CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
| : Kote ALASKA, 1958.
rN
= an \
as
vay a
A “Prvew
3 outa at
FASO oa
* ARR SO eo
a
| Figure 21
i i ; \ : UNITED STATES
L LS i ‘ ; : : es DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
BAU UE ORI \ : — . GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1; 250.000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
100. 150 MILES
150 KILOMETERS
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
GUARD STATION
pipe ‘ === PRIMARY HIGHWAY
i Af ¢ Ste ‘ . Sees
oe so Sot Bo ; —— NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
Peas a < APRIL
PRS R SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU.
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958.
aoe
ppl se 4
GIS
1@ BIG DELTA ha
ee BUFFALO CENTER
eto 16 LAS Shr Soh
ey MING! nae Noo Maa yi
: : Cire,
eae
TANACRO
na ok
GUE
Figure 21
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1; 250000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
100 _1gp Mites
150 KILOMETERS
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
@ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
mm OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
#& DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
® GUARD STATION
s=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
MAY
SOURCE: U.S WEATHER BUREAU.
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958
Levant Rive
wee
Shee,
Figure 22
|
|
|
WA
f
al
“FORT YUKON | on
~~ Sf
we
yy CENTRAL $2
er ary "
a? ya
FAIRBANKS [yf
ae A ye Afi hts
cat @® BIG DELTA Wa
BUFFALO CENTER
PR AL,
CHUMINA 4
fs ANACROSS
ers S1y 3 pyvammyrie Pal”
: MMIT RR SEED OY GN
RATH ‘i Pet Soehes ie ae. ,
at be i 4
ALLEN FR i
Pelee
Vv eax
SPAA
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILEO FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1: 250.000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL- SOURCES
1954
eee
150 KILOMETERS,
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
— LEGEND
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA: STATION
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
GUARD STATION
=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
MAY
SOURCE: U.S WEATHER BUREAU.
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, /958.
Ve,
} BS See
Barn en we “
Pons PH os Me
Figure 22
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1, 250.000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
a DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
| Peay 2 ; GUARD. STATION
| be aa == PRIMARY HIGHWAY
| \ — NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
| | Veen 4 JUNE
emer, SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU,
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
‘ : ALASKA, 1958
pret %
ca
Figure 23
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE |; 250.000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
100 __150 MILES
150 KILOMETERS,
——
Seu
Aula DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
“| LEGEND
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION ]
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
GUARD. STATION
=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
EATER a
RT YUKON 213 met
SNe ty
SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU,
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958.
ib
beddte
LAKE
~MINCHUM
N
Wi OTe,
Figure 23
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1; 250.000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
150 MILES,
150 KILOMETERS
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
@ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
% OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
#& DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
% GUARD STATION
=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
—— NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
JULY
SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU,
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958
N
Fe ARAL SOE cero
: aN Kae DPSEMRTN ram ane ie
Figure 24
Pra,
am if
} yf
wb ah yy 7
Ty
wee
nl Blah
alot te ly +9 ;
Bip edb a
UNALAKL EET fist
LOFT EW hie Y
spy
Las
W)
! bigee
eee
ny
TNCH
MMI
ts
ss
yt AHEL
LKANS
fi.
HOMER 46
power
re
ipanin?
Na pureosn ant
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1; 250000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
180 MILES
150 KILOMETERS.
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEWEL
LEGEND
@ CLIMATOLOGICAL. DATA STATION
m OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
& DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
2% GUARD STATION
m= PRIMARY HIGHWAY
——— NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
JULY
SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU,
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958
Figure 24
Jeasenn
— LEGEND
@ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
m OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
# DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
& GUARD STATION
seme PRIMARY HIGHWAY
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1: 250000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
150 MILES,
=
50 KILOMETERS
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
—— NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
AUGUST.
SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU,
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958
f is
[ecto Landing
(gs
e. ees, ean
Ia BOR, s
Figure 25
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1.250 0C0. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
‘so autes
$0 KILOMETERS
savik
Awan DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
GUARD STATION
meme PRIMARY HIGHWAY
a)
a ROE see? a
a Xi 4 S \ i =——— NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
@ & FORT YUKON tS Ow eee we AUGUST.
+e SF a , SOURCE® U.S. WEATHER BUREAU,
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958
h,
Figure 25
ae ze
icra =
\
Iv \ sane 007"
|
A ‘
\ awa
eee
Jeno
\
\. \
~ pai
( +
\ aS v
4 NF e i
a y
© &
4, x
a E
Ly.
4
6
bg a
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECUNNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1; 250 000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
_— LEGEND
@ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
™@ OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
4& DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE —
% GUARD STATION
== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
—— NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
APRIL. THROUGH AUGUST.
SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU,
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958.
fe AB
SH PIS
Figure 26
NV
i
ge
f TSO.
Ha
¢ = A aid SD ip Puy ¥ZH
TANANA bt if PL
2 Net Pie ge
fey Ay fa FAIRBANKS
Ree
A
punk EAs ya
to @ LAKE MINC
Psy
AA RG
eh
«
ab
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECUNNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE |: 250.000, ANO OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
150 MILES
St
150 KILOMETERS
=
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
® CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
™ OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
& DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
& GUARD STATION
mmm== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
=——— NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
APRIL THROUGH AUGUST.
SOURCE: U.S. WEATHER BUREAU,
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958
7
goo, i
ip rp
RN cen" ae ie
Figure 26
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ay ALASKA
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1; 250 000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES ,
wh \
Ania" \ DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
[ @ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
® OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
#& DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
& GUARD STATION
== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
—— NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
ANNUAL
SOURCE: U.S, WEATHER BUREAU,
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958.
Le
E. vai Ce See . Me : A
ox eR SiO Fei Soe
| Figure 27
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1, 250.000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES .
1954
% 150 MILES
= ==
0
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
@ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
® OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
& DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
hk GUARD STATION
Pha Gh teen mane : eae == PRIMARY HIGHWAY
Piae en gies |
aS, ‘
/goars
—— NORMAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN,
ANNUAL.
SOURCE: U.S, WEATHER BUREAU,
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA,
ALASKA, 1958.
ye
BIG DELTA
py By
LO
&GLENNALLEN “Fp
Eek bg
RAK
@ GULKAN
Figure 27
ZONE OF DOMINANT MARITIME INFLUENCE
Ruggedness of the topography in this zone
markedly affects local climatic conditions. It
produces great differences in temperature and
precipitation in local areas that are not very far
apart.
Climatic conditions at individual locations in
this zone are characterized by small variations
in temperature, high humidities, high fog fre-
quency, considerable cloudiness, and abundant
precipitation.
Extremes of temperature are quite localized
and usually of short duration. The warmest tem-
peratures usually come in late July or in August.
Throughout the Maritime Zone only about one
station in 15 reaches or exceeds 90° F. The mean
temperature during these months is near the mid-
fifties.
Temperature changes between seasons are
gradual; the length of the growing season varies
considerably from one year to another. The
average freeze-free period varies from 120 days
in the north to 150 days in the south. Freeze-
free periods within any given locality vary within
wide limits.
The overflow of cold air from intense high
pressure cells over the mainland interior produces
downslope winds that attain destructively high
speeds at times. Because of its exposure to the
open sea, the entire Maritime Zone is vulnerable
to strong winds associated with intense cyclonic
circulations that frequent these northern ocean
areas. Throughout the coastal area the rugged
terrain produces extremely localized wind con-
ditions.
Precipitation ranges from about 25 inches
annually in the northwest portion to 221 inches
in the southeast. The steep terrain, rising out of
the sea, creates topographic inducement for the
high rates of precipitation along the northern
Gulf Coast.
Visibility is usually low because of cloudy
and foggy weather. Fog, usually the advective
type, occurs frequently during the summer over
the Aleutians and often drifts eastward to blan-
ket the western Gulf Coast.
23
TRANSITION ZONE
The change from a maritime to a semicon-
tinental climate characterizes the Transition Zone.
This change is rather abrupt along the boundary
between the South Coast and Copper River Divi-
sions because of the sharp ridge of mountains
along this boundary. The Bristol Bay and West
Central portions have a gradual climatic transi-
tion since moisture-laden air moving toward the
interior meets no formidable mountain barriers.
Typical maritime features become less prominent
farther inland: temperature varies more mark-
edly; humidities are lower; cloudiness declines;
and precipitation totals recede.
The Copper River Basin has extremely cold
winters, but maximum temperatures reach 90°
to 95° F. in summer. This climatic feature of the
Copper River Basin indicates that its weather pat-
tern approaches that of the Continental Zone.
In areas more directly affected by maritime in-
fluences, extreme hiahs range around the mid-
eighties.
The average freeze-free season varies from
52 to 132 days. The 169-day freeze-free period
recorded at Homer one year was exceptional.
Precipitation in the Transition Zone markedly
decreases from the high averages in the Mari-
time Zone. A drastic reduction in precipitation
in the Copper River Valley and land westward
to the upper Matanuska Valley is caused by the
configuration of the sheltering Chugach Range.
Thunderstorms are common in the Copper River
area during the summer.
Precipitation generally ranges from 10 to
about 30 inches. A few local areas receive heavy
precipitation (75 to 80 inches) because south-
easterly winds resulting from low pressure cen-
tered near the Alaska Peninsula are hardly af-
fected by sheltering terrain. In contrast, the
Kenai Range shelters the western Kenai Penin-
sula from the southeasterly winds, and the total
precipitation there is comparable to that in Mata-
nuska Valley (15 inches at Palmer). On the more
exposed southern tip, annual totals average 25
to 40 inches.
The Aleutian low pressure cell is usually
weak in early spring; hence, April has the least
precipitation of any month of the year at prac-
tically all points over the zone except the Copper
River portion. Precipitation increases markedly
over the mainland beginning in late June. The
low tends to move northward across the Bering
Sea and brings a rather persistent southwesterly
flow into the Interior. During August cloudy,
rainy weather predominates and the _ interior
points of the West Central portion receive meas-
urable precipitation on 4 days out of 5. The
westward drift of the low becomes pronounced
in late November or early December, and pre-
cipitation declines rather sharply over most of
the Transition Zone.
The permafrost area varies with summer
warmth and winter cold, but it extends south-
ward well into the northern portions of this zone.
It is present from the northern slopes of the
Wrangell Mountains through the Glennallen and
Holy Cross areas, along the inland borders of
Cook Inlet, Bristol Bay, and West Central por-
tions. The amount of continuity is shown in
figure 28.
Over the Copper River and Cook Inlet por-
tions, winds are usually light, chiefly because of
the sheltering by nearby mountain ridges. Strong,
localized winds develop in some areas as the
result of downslope drainage. Most frequent ob-
servations of these winds have been in the lower
Matanuska and Knik River Valleys, mostly dur-
ing the winter. These strong winds may persist
for days when even slightly reinforced by flow
patterns usually associated with low pressure
systems centered near Kodiak Island or the Gulf
of Alaska. Certain areas of the Bristol Bay and
West Central portions are relatively unsheltered
and are frequented by strong winds that often
extend their effectiveness well into the interior.
DOMINANT CONTINENTAL ZONE
Two major factors contribute to the typical
continental climate: (1) the area's remoteness
from the open sea, and (2) mountain barriers
that prevent inland movement of marine air.
The Interior Basin experiences great sea-
sonal temperature extremes: Maximum tempera-
24
tures reach or exceed 90° F. almost every sum-
mer. Fort Yukon and Eagle have daily maximum
readings averaging 70° to 75° F. during July
and August. Prolonged daylight in early June
through late July contributes strongly in main-
taining high temperatures.
above the horizon continuously for about 1
month at Fort Yukon beginning about June 5.
During this season, the average diurnal tempera-
ture change is about 30° F.; however, ranges of
only 10 degrees have been recorded.
The sun remains
The Interior Basin has recorded the highest
and lowest readings for all of Alaska. Tempera-
tures at Fort Yukon have ranged from a high of
100° F. to a low of —75° F. Combined with its
counterpart in Canada's Northwest Territory, the
Interior Basin records provide a classic example
of the northern hemisphere continental climate.
Terminal dates of the freeze-free season
(mid-May to late August) can be depended on
as a result of the sharp rise in spring tempera-
tures and an equally sharp decline in the fall.
Permafrost underlies the soil in most of the
Interior Basin in spite of the warm summertime
temperatures. Ground temperatures remain
rather cool except for a shallow surface layer.
Gradual thawing of the permafrost during the
summer allows ice-cold water to permeate the
soil layers immediately above it. The cooling
effect, when extended to the soil mantle utilized
in vegetal growth, slows seasonal production of
vegetation.
The Interior Basin is almost surrounded by a
high ridge of mountains; their sheltering effect
is @ primary cause for the light precipitation (6
to 14 inches) in this area. Most of it falls in June
and July, but occasionally some occurs in Aug-
ust. Average monthly rainfall during these
months totals close to 2 inches — slightly less
than averages for the growing season over the
central and western parts of the Dakotas. Total
summer precipitation may vary widely within
relatively short distances chiefly because shower-
type precipitation predominates. In local areas
thunderstorms may occur on several consecutive
days.
ger OO
awied™
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1; 250 000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
GUARD STATION
=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
seers PERMAFROST DISTRIBUTION
SOURCE: HOPKINS ET AL (1/955)
Figure 28
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1: 250 000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
0 = Oo 50 100 sso mies
50 100 150 KILOMETERS
— <==
SN
Loa DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
_ LEGEND
@ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
m = =OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
& DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
&% GUARD STATION
s=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
AUD
ioe ON Det Lien
Re xy ® -BETTLES a
sere PERMAFROST DISTRIBUTION
SOURCE’ HOPKINS ET AL (1955)
J
4 Na
Apa
seal Se BIG DELTA Be
we id
2 PA RNACROSS
- cLERINALLEN
i Ae b
: oe Yi Cm Mp
Aaa | sos
RE rd
Ny Bie
Sea OE TRA
a ® ILIAMNA p }
hi Ske
sae
a Ra Si
Ww ay
ce:
Figure 28
Si tee a ree On = — SS
= — = Te i = = = Se hn ee ae
tems air tee —— — OOO ee ———————
ARCTIC ZONE
Climatic conditions of the Arctic Zone are
Unique and contrast sharply with conditions in
other zones.
The effectiveness of the Brooks Range in
influencing the climate of the land area to the
north has not been definitely established, al-
though the Range is a topographic barrier.
Variations in temperature here are confined
to narrower limits than in the Interior Basin.
Extremely low temperatures in this zone range
between —45° and —60° F. Seldom do maxi-
mum temperatures reach 80°F. Even during the
prolonged period of continual daylight, the sun's
rays reach the earth's surface at such low angles
that they cause little surface warming.
Mean hourly windspeeds in summer aver-
age from 11 to 15 miles per hour. Maximum
summertime windspeed has reached 52 miles
per hour at Point Barrow.
Average annual precipitation for this zone
is from 5 to 10 inches, although 16 inches occurs
near Cape Lisburne. Annual snowfall totals
average about 50 inches east of Cape Lisburne
and from the Arctic Coast to the Brooks Range.
Kotzebue experiences the warmest average tem-
peratures and consequently receives a smaller
ratio of snowfall to total precipitation than
the remaining portion of the zone. The low
moisture-carrying capacity of the colder air that
prevails over the area accounts for this zone's
having such light precipitation.
The average freeze-free period contrasts
with that in other zones; it ranges from 65 days
in the Shungnak area to just short of 90 days at
Kotzebue. The coastal area north of the Brooks
Range has minimum readings averaging near or
below freezing for all months of the year; vege-
tal growth is limited to those species that can
endure the vicissitudes of this rigorous climate.
WEATHER FACTORS THAT AFFECT FIRE
BEHAVIOR AND CONTROL
Weather conditions are highly important to
ignition and spread of wildfire. The amount and
frequency of precipitation, air temperature, air
moisture, and air movement combine to produce
29
the dryness and consequently the flammability
of fuels. Other atmospheric conditions also
strongly influence behavior of a going fire. For
example, a thunderstorm not only starts light-
ning fires, but its presence may often cause er-
ratic winds that blow the fire out of control.
To interpret the normal weather patterns at
various places and at different times of day,
month, and year, weather records from 18 sta-
tions have been analyzed for the period 1950-
58.4 Observations taken from these 18 stations
sample the climates experienced in their respec-
tive climatic zones (fig. 20). The individual sta-
tions are widely separated and only represent
the heterogeneity of climes experienced in the
State. The recorded data show the normal con-
ditions that can be expected; however, local or
temporary weather situations are often abnor-
mally worse.
PRECIPITATION
Precipitation varies widely throughout the
State, but generally decreases from south to
north (figs. 26 and 27). Successive east-west
mountain ranges prevent moist maritime air
from reaching interior regions.
Great variation in summer rainfall is indi-
cated by the records at representative weather
stations in the Interior Basin, West Central, and
Cook Inlet climatic divisions. (See table 1 and
figs. 21 through 25).
The combination of time of year with
amount of precipitation that falls then is an im-
portant factor influencing fire behavior. The
length of time between summer rains has an
important bearing on the amount of growth and
the degree of curing in the herbaceous species;
duration of these periods likewise affects the
moisture content of dead material. Long periods
of dry weather hasten the curing date of herba-
ceous vegetation, and thus extend the period of
high flammability.
Table 2 indicates distribution of rainfall
among the 4 summer months and the ratio of
this season's precipitation to the annual total.
4Summary of the analyses appears in the appendix and is
highlighted in this chapter.
Table 1. — Variation in summer precipitation
Weather
station May
Normal Max. Min.
Anchorage O51 2:00! 70:02
(Cook Inlet)
Bethel 89 2.50 .02
(West Central)
Fairbanks Agee 275 .O7
(Interior Basin)
McGrath 94 1.98 .34
(Interior Basin)
Growing conditions early in the season de-
pend upon fall and winter moisture because too
little precipitation falls early enough in the spring
to promote plant growth. A deficiency of winter
precipitation or early loss of snowpack may indi-
cate the possibility of early periods of high
flammability; in addition, this set of circum-
stances can cause deeper than normal drying
of ground fuels which so often means a greater
resistance to control of fires. For
most reporting stations, the monthly precipita-
tion increases during the summer. Less than 20
percent of the normal annual precipitation falls
between April and June. Only a few interior
stations report more than 35 percent of their
than usual
Month
June July
Normal Max. Min. Normal Max. Min.
0.89 2.94 0.03 1255583) 2 5 OLY,
1.20 2.48 .30 DiI2DOWS395 49
IES/eeeSra2 P| 1hO2Qe FAl24' .40
2.06 4.36 42 DSO NTS 76
annual precipitation during the period generally
considered the growing season.
The amount of moisture that falls in any
single storm period is important to fire control.
The frequency of moisture occurrence affects the
flammability of the vegetative materials and the
rate of buildup of fire season severity. Rainfall
intensities greater than 0.25 inch in any one day
occur but seldom (table 3). Virtually no precipi-
tation falls on three-fourths of the days in May.
At very few stations did more than 0.26 inch of
precipitation occur on one or more days during
May. During April, the weather is even drier.
In May and June both frequency and intensity
of rainfall gradually increase.
Table 2.—Percent of normal annual precipitation, April through July
(Av. 1950-58)
Weather Month
station April May June
Anchorage 2.8 3.6 6.2
Bethel 3.0 4.9 6.5
Fairbanks 2.4 6.2 les
Fort Yukon 2.6 4.9 10.9
Galena as: 4.3 11.6
McGrath 2.6 4.9 10.8
Northway 3.1 6.3 17.6
26
Seasonal
Tayi ge reco ae
Inches
10.9 23.5 14.27
12.6 27.0 18.17
16.1 36.2 11.92
14.8 Sore 6.52
18.6 35.8 14.55
2 30.4 19.13
25.6 52.6 11.34
|
|
||
|
t
}
i]
Table 3.—Rainfall intensity classes by number of days per month
(Av. 1950-58)
Weather Month
station May June July
Normal 0.0- 0.01- Normal 0.0- 0.01- Normal 0.0- 0.01-
ppt. trace 0.25 0.26+ ppt. trace 0.25 0.26-+ ppt. trace 0.25 0.26+
Anchorage 0.51 26.6 4.0 0.3 0.89 21.3 7.9 0.8 1.55 18.9 9.4 2.7
Bethel 89 18.6 9.6 8 1.20 18.1 10.8 11 2.29 15.5 13.0 2.4
Fairbanks 74 25.2 5.3 5 87 207 7.8 1.5 1.92 16.3 8.6 ya)
Fort Yukon 32 28.0 2.8 2 aA 23.8 5.7 5 96 25.3 5.4 3
Galena .63 24.5 6.1 4 1.69 21.4 Ti. 9 2.69 19.4 9.4 22
McGrath 94 23.8 6.5 7 2.06 19.6 9.1 1.3 2.32 17.8 9.8 3.4
Northway 72 23.0 6.9 1] 2.00 19.5 8.7 1.8 2.89 18.4 10.6 2.0
Fort Yukon receives slightly less than 2 radiation and the surrounding air mass. Both
inches of rainfall during the May-July period; exposure and arrangement of fuel particles bear
77 days are rain free, and more than one-fourth on the actual temperature the fuel attains. Air
inch will fall on only 1 day during the 3 months. temperature also affects the rate of moisture loss
TEMPERATURE following a period of wetting by rain or dew.
Observation and knowledge of air tempera- Temperatures are higher in the Interior Basin
ture are important in studying fire behavior. than in any other zone. Nowhere do they stay
Their main value lies in the relation between above 80° F. for extended periods (table 4), but
temperature and its effects on equilibrium mois- the sustained level over a period of 18 hours
ture content and on ambient air stability condi- decidedly affects fuel moisture and fuel tempera-
tions. Fuel temperature is affected by solar ture.
Table 4.—Average daily air temperature classes (degrees F.) by number of days
in each temperature class per month
(Av. 1950-58)
Weather Month
station June July
30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89
Anchorage 0.1 572 15:9 TAS) 1.2 0.1 0) ies 14.9 L221 2.6 0.1
Bethel 4) 9.8 12.4 5.8 ileal 0 ) 4.7 16.8 7.6 1.8 mi!
Fairbanks Pp) 2.3 8.9 les) 6.1 12 0) 126 9.0 11.6 720 1.8
Fort Yukon 3 3.0 8.6 11.4 6.3 4 2 1.4 Zl 123 8.4 1.6
Galena 2 3.2 11.4 10.6 4.1 5 0 1.4 11.9 11.3 5.4 1.0
McGrath a5 4.3 1L.3 929. 3.5 a5} 7] 2.8 1320 9.8 4.2 Tal
Northway ES 5.2 10.5 10.2 335 23 al 322 10.9 10.8 5.3 of
Afternoon temperature affects the plans for bility. More days have higher afternoon tem-
control of fires. As the long day progresses,
fuel moistures reach or approach equilibrium
moisture content. This in turn increases flamma-
peratures at Fairbanks than at Anchorage (table
5). This fact may be directly related to the greater
fire problem in the Fairbanks area.
Table 5.—3:00 p.m. temperature classes (degrees F.) by number of days
per month
(Av. 1950-58)
Weather
station June
30-49 50-69
Anchorage 1.0 257.
Fairbanks 0 M6
PERMAFROST
Permafrost consists of organic and soil ma-
terial that remains frozen year round. Regional
climatic differences result in variation of perma-
frost thickness from more than 1,000 feet in
northern Alaska to permafrost-free terrain in
southen Alaska (fig. 28). Precipitation (through
ground water), temperature, and insulation ma-
terial affect the presence and depth of perma-
frost. Permafrost, in return, somewhat influences
local temperature and considerably influences
the supply of usable ground water.
Because of their active water movement,
streams generally are underlain by deeper and
wider unfrozen areas than are lakes; coarse,
permeable sand or gravel is more likely to be
free of permafrost than is impermeable silt.
Abundant unfrozen zones at shallow depth can
be expected in mountainous areas, especially on
south slopes. The most favorable sites for for-
mation or preservation of permafrost in moun-
tain areas are on north slopes and beneath poor-
ly drained surfaces on broad interfluves and
valley bottoms (Hopkins, et al. 1955). Table 33
shows the time of season by which the ground
is thawed to various depths.
Permafrost affects vegetation in several
ways that bear on fire behavior and conse-
quences. The cold soil above the permafrost
layer inhibits growth and delays the ‘‘greening-
up’ of plants in the spring to the extent that
much dry material is available for burning early
in the fire season. Roots tend to grow laterally
and above the frozen layer. When fire passes
through a stand of timber and consumes the
organic mantle, tree roots have nothing left to
cling to; thereafter, even light winds can blow
down large areas of trees that otherwise would
have survived the fire.
28
Month
July
70-89 30-49 50-69 70-89
3:3 0 24.7 6.3
1389 0) 15.0 16.0
The presence of permafrost often misleads
firefighters. Frozen organic matter thaws and
dries out when a fireline trench exposes it to
open air; this permits a smoldering fire to escape
across the once safe zone.
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
Air moisture is generally thought of in terms
of relative humidity. In Interior Alaska, humidi-
ties in May and June are lower than in July,
and considerably lower than in August (tables
6 and 25). This situation is the reverse of what
is usual in most of the western United States.
Air moisture affects burning conditions
mainly by varying the fuel moisture content.
Most fine fuels are sensitive to changes in air
moisture and follow the humidity pattern rather
closely. In heavier fuels, moisture content
changes more slowly since a much smaller per-
centage of the total volume is exposed for rapid
transfer of moisture.
LENGTH OF DAYLIGHT
Both air and fuels receive heat by solar
radiation. The prolonged hours of daylight and
sunshine contribute to maintaining fairly high
temperatures. Lengthening or shortening of day-
light at a given latitude follows the change in
the meridian angle of the sun. Surface tempera-
tures are higher in the summer than in the winter
not only because the sun shines longer, but be-
cause it shines more directly, and therefore, more
intensely on the earth's surface. This potential
worsening of fire-weather conditions is some-
what balanced by the fact that the amount of
radiant energy received on any surface area de-
creases ads we move from tropical to northern
latitudes because of the lowering angle of inci-
dence of solar radiation.
Table 6.—3:00 p.m. relative humidity classes (in percent) by number of days
per month
(Av. 1950-58)
Weather
station May
30-
<30 49 50+
Anchorage Tal? 36:9) 13:0
Bethel ae -O100 24e1
Fairbanks 6:7 17.6 6.6
Fort Yukon led) “16:95 258
Galena 3:3) 13.9 71318
McGrath ZO V6.9. 175
Northway 52 11520; S058
Table 7 compares the number of hours of
daylight for stations at three latitudes: Fort
Yukon (lat. 66°35'N.), Anchorage (lat. 61°10'N.),
and Missoula, Montana (lat. 46°55'N.).
Table 7.—Duration of daylight
Location
Date Fort Yukon Anchorage Missoula
Hrs. Min. Hrs. Min. Hrs. Min.
May 1 17 30 16 i] 14 25
1] 18 52 17 06 14 53
21 20 22 17 57 15 18
June 1 DD A 18° Ag la "738
11 24 00 19 13 18 _ 50
2) 24.00 19 - 25 1a 7 53
July 1 24-00 1 is VS! eo)
1] 22 18 18 47 15 38
21 207)" ".311 18. = .06 15>. 19
The length of day or duration of possible
sunshine is much greater at higher latitudes — a
maximum of 5 hours greater at Fort Yukon than
at Missoula, Montana. Missoula, however, re-
ceives more intense heating because the sun's
rays are more nearly perpendicular to the earth's
surface when the sun is at its zenith. This in turn
often dries out fuels more than does the longer
period of lower maximum temperatures farther
north.
Month
June July
30- 30-
<30 49 50+ <30 49 50+
0.6 10.0 19.4 0.2 62 24.6 %
4 60 23.6 0) 44 26.6
521 16:0. 8.9 3.5 12:3. “15.2
ho 187° 10:3 Zo Nom 147
3:2, 12:9 13.8 Ie 2:3 Aco
29 P1338. 13:3 1.0 11.1 18.9
52 15.2 Wee Dez Noel “Se
WIND
Wind influences the behavior of a fire.
29
High windspeed may cause a fire to jump bar-
riers and travel in the crowns of trees, or to spot
ahead of the main fire front. Wind combined
with topography can cause erratic and violent
fire behavior.
As should be expected, afternoon winds
usually are stronger than morning winds. Weath-
er records indicate that Bethel is windier than
most places, as the 0 to 7 miles-per-hour speed
appears on very few days, but the 8 to 12 and
13 to 18 miles-per-hour range is high for morn-
ing readings and at least average for afternoon
readings. Fort Yukon follows the same general
trend. In May, many stations record the 13 to 18
miles-per-hour range on more days than in June
or July (table 8); this indicates that winds in-
fluence fire behavior more in May than in other
months.
Many factors influence the direction of air-
flow at any specific place. Geographic location
determines whether maritime or continental air-
flow affects a given area. Topography can cur-
tail, accentuate, or change the surface direction
of a prevailing wind. Winds of unusually high
velocity that blow out of mountain canyons are
generally associated with glaciers lying in these
Table 8.—9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. wind velocity classes (in miles per hour) by
number of days per month
(Av. 1950-58)
Wind velocity classes, miles per hour
Weather 0-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 2 Dict
station 9 AM 3 PM 9AM 3PM 9AM 3PM 9AM 3PM 9AM 3PM
May
Anchorage 19.2 7.0 8.1 13.6 3.1 Tit 0.6 1.6 0.1 0.1
Bethel 9.5 4.5 12.0 1322 7.8 10.8 1.6 2.3 Hl] 2.
Fairbanks 20.3 13.9 7.1 10.0 3.3 6.1 3 9 0 Al
Ft. Yukon 9.8 7.8 eZ, 13.4 7.9 8.1 1.6 1.3 0 4
Galena 13.4 10.5 Hii 11.4 5.8 73 7, 1.6 0 2.
McGrath 20.0 1351 9.2 12.9 1.8 4.6 0 2 0 2
Northway 15.4 11.1 11.8 12.3 317 7.2 1 4 0 0
June
Anchorage 20.3 11.6 8.0 12.4 1.6 4.6 i 1.4 0 0
Bethel 8.1 7.2 14.5 13.4 6.6 8.6 7, 8 al 0
Fairbanks 19.7 13.3 6.7 10.5 BH 5.1 A 1.0 J zl
Ft. Yukon 12.6 7.8 9.2 13.7 6.7 6.3 1.4 1.8 J 4
Galena 15.2 11.6 8.8 10.8 4.9 57 8 1.6 £ 3
McGrath 20.2 15.7 72 9.2 2.6 4.8 0 3 0 0
Northway 15.3 10.0 10.2 1331 3.9 6.3 6 7 0 0
July
Anchorage PVes2) 15.6 Teli 11.0 123 32%, Al of 0 (0)
Bethel 12.0 8.5 11.8 12.6 6.2 8.2 9 1.6 J 4)
Fairbanks 23.3 15.7 6.3 10.5 123 4.6 a] 2 0 0
Ft. Yukon 14.8 9.6 9.3 12.2 5.4 6.8 1.4 2.1 él 3
Galena 18.2 14.0 6.6 O75 4.9 4.8 Ae) Ded. 4 oS)
McGrath 22.8 16.8 6.3 10.8 haces ie 0 2 0 0
Northway 17.9 14.8 9.4 11.2 3.6 4.6 1 A 0 0
canyons. Taku winds, Knik winds, Delta River portant to a fire control officer. Appendix tables
winds, and Summit winds are well-known ex-
amples of this phenomenon. Occurrence of such
winds can usually be predicted by alert fore-
casters. Table 9 shows the variations between
reporting stations on the frequency of changes
in wind direction during the month. Of interest
is the shifting from month to month of predomi-
nant wind direction at the same location. These
observations can be valuable in long-range fire
control planning. The extremely small number
of samples recorded below presents the proba-
bility that even though two reporting stations
have similar characteristics the intervening area
may vary greatly from them.
SKY CONDITIONS
Sky conditions have a multiple influence on
behavior and control of forest fires. Some gen-
eral knowledge of what to expect in various
places and at different times of the season is im-
30
29 through 32 summarize in detail the available
information on the amount of cloud cover, types
of weather (predominant moisture forms), visi-
bility distances, and ceiling heights.
The amount or extent of cloud cover and the
prevalent weather type greatly affect fire be-
havior and the flammability of fuels. Increased
density of clouds and smoke reduces the pene-
tration of sun rays, and allows only a portion of
their heat concentration to reach the earth's sur-
face. It also reduces the radiational heat escap-
ing from the earth's surface. The combined ef-
fect reduces the diurnal temperature fluctuation.
Rapid changes of surface temperature resulting
from intermittent shading by clouds may cause
troublesome changes in wind direction and ve-
locity. On one-half to two-thirds of the days
during the fire season, three-fourths of the sky
is covered by some type of clouds. This is equal-
Table 9.—3:00 p.m. wind direction classes by number of days per month
(Av. 1950-58)
Weather
station N NE E
Anchorage ‘1.6 0.8 O7
Bethel 3.9 1.6 4.5
Fairbanks 2.6 4.4 3.9
Fort Yukon Tel 14.0 2.0
Galena 73 2.8 5.6
McGrath 4.7 Af 5.4
Northway 3.0 “7 2.6
Anchorage 2.6 0.4 0.1
Bethel 2.6 2a 2.3
Fairbanks 1s 7; 2.8 1.9
Fort Yukon 1.2 8.3 1.0
Galena 32 les 2.6
McGrath 37. De; 3.1
Northway 3.9 12 14
Anchorage! 3.3 1.0 0.2
Bethel 2.4 2a 1.7
Fairbanks! 1.3 2] 1.4
Fort Yukon 8 5a] el
Galena Did 8 1.5
McGrath 2.6 1.7 1.6
Northway 3.0 1.8 2.4
TSix days’ records missing.
ly true for inland and coastal areas. The amount
or extent of cover gradually increases from April
through August.
The interior of Alaska experiences few days
during May through July when the ceiling is
lower than 1,000 feet. More often the ceiling
height is greater than 10,000 feet. During Au-
gust, when there is more rainfall, the ceiling is
lower and visibility is materially reduced.
Both smoke and haze affect surface weather
somewhat but not nearly as much as they affect
fire control activities. Reduced visibility makes fire
detection more difficult. Most interior stations
Wind direction
SE
31
S SW W NW Calm
May
9.0 PIP 6.6 4.9 Os
6.1 210) 2.1 6.6 6
4.] 5:5 3.8 2.8 lead
1.] af 4.4 1.0 0
ys 3.4 2.1 2.0 2:3
4.4 4.6 See 4.0 4
2a, 3h 4.2 9.8 1.6
June
5:13 oe2 9.0 6.3 “0:2
7.0 4.7 Df: 5.9 4
310 gE 6.3 DY, 2.0
1.6 7.0 8.3 1.6 .O
De, 7.8 32 4.] oie)
6.7 5.1 3.3 <P ies
2:1 2.4 The 8.2 3
July
320 3.8 8.7 7.4 0.8
Sh) 52 3.0 522 ae
3.6 6.0 8.6 2.4 220
Dal 8.7 9.7 Dee al
4.1 75 4.0 S58 5.9
829. 56 3.4 31 Ie)
1.8 2.8 4.8 10.1 De.
report some visibility reduction in June due to
smoke haze; the effect is greater after July 1.
Thunderstorms present a double danger.
First, they cause lightning fires. Second, the
presence of a fully developed cell may cause
high velocity downdraft winds that often make
fires behave erratically and burn out of control
in almost any direction. Available thunderstorm
data were inadequate for useful analysis, since
routine weather records indicate only thunder
that is actually heard by the observer, and thus
encompasses an area with a radius of a very
few miles.
SIGNIFICANCE OF DEVIATIONS FROM NORMAL
The preceding discussion shows what is
considered the normal expectancy for local cli-
matic conditions. A firm knowledge of the nor-
mal situation is vital to intelligent planning and
strategy for fire control. Knowledge of devia-
tions from the normal is also extremely impor-
tant. If the strength of the attack organization
is to be based on average bad conditions, then
the extent of variation of present conditions from
the normal must be known within some given
limit of accuracy. It is not logical to build up a
fire control force strong enough to handle the
worst season; neither is it logical to build one
only strong enough to handle a normal season.
Weather conditions during two recent fire
seasons — 1950 and 1957 — are considered
critical. Deficient precipitation, stronger-than-
average winds, low levels of air moisture, and
abundance of dry lightning storms all increased
the incidence and affected the behavior of fires.
This buildup in fire load, of course, very soon
taxed beyond breaking point the ability of the
fire control forces to cope with the immediate fire
situation.
1950.—The year 1950 was one of the driest
recorded. Precipitation was below normal over
the entire Interior. The lowest annual precipita-
tation measured in Alaska that year (at Fort
Yukon) was 3.83 inches, about 55 percent of
normal. Large forest fires in that area occurred
from early spring until fall. More than 2 million
acres of forest land were burned by 224 fires
that summer. This was one of the worst fire
Seasons experienced since the beginning of or-
ganized protection in the State. (In the first years
of organized firefighting, 1940 and 1941, 4.5
and 3.6 million acres, respectively, were burned;
records for these years are sketchy.)
Many new weather and fire records were
established in 1950. Stations over most of the
State reported above normal temperatures for
March and April. Drought persisted in the Yukon
and southern valley regions from January
through September. A forest fire between the
Chandalar and Porcupine Rivers in the Fort Yukon
area burned 246,000 acres in the month of June;
if spread over the whole month this would mean
burning more than 13 square miles each day.
32
Figure 29. — High velocity down-canyon winds are often
associated with glaciers. Matanuska Glacier.
The many dry thunderstorms from June through
August caused a serious outbreak of fires each
month in both the Yukon and southern valley
regions; temperatures remained above normal at
many stations in these regions. Some relief from
the drought came in October, yet precipitation
reported by many stations was still below
normal.
1957.—As the 1957 season progressed,
weather conditions approached the critical point.
April's maximum temperatures climbed to new
records at many stations. Above-normal read-
ings continued through May; record highs were
reached in the Kenai Peninsula. June tempera-
tures were the highest ever in a wide belt ex-
tending from the northern Arctic Coast through
the central mainland on to the Alaskan Penin-
sula.
Temperatures dropped to near normal over
most of the State during July, but rose to ab-
normally high levels again in August. Warming
trends continued at most points into September;
Fairbanks registered a record high of 84° F.
As a rule, above-normal temperatures indi-
cate airflow associated with above-normal pre-
cipitation. However, this year vast areas of the
State experienced temperatures well above nor-
mal but received relatively light precipitation. The
driest area was in Alaska's interior, where the
precipitation total remained consistently below
normal month after month.
Tanana Valley experienced the most persis-
tent drought on record during the growing sea-
son; total precipitation from February through
May totaled less than 50 percent of normal. The
only other growing season with comparable de-
ficiencies was 1950. A slight break came about
June 20, but the month's total was only 40 per-
cent of normal. The drought continued through
August and September; precipitation was only
about 20 percent of normal in the Fairbanks
area.
More than 5 million acres burned this year,
a total far exceeding that of any other year of
record; this was 2% times the area burned in
1950.
33
Comments.—On all forest and range lands
the severe fire seasons are usually the years of
more critical weather. Fire-weather and _ fire-
danger rating records show this relation well.
Years with dry springs followed by dry summers
almost always have many large fires. Alaska
is no different from other States in that respect.
Observation of weather patterns and associated
fire history reveals that in Alaska the weather
does not always get hot and dry and stay that
way as some may think. Further research and
analysis will help produce guides whereby build-
up of critical fire seasons can be more easily
recognized; of importance too, use of such guides
will assist prediction of conditions which are not
critical.
st
ise)
CHAPTER 4
FUELS
In forest fire language, ‘‘fuel'’ refers to any
material that may burn if it is ignited — grass,
needles, tree trunks, logs, muskeg, peat, or even
coal. It may be either dead or living. Fuel is
thought of in two ways: (1) as represented by
species or species groups (cover or timber type),
or (2) as represented by fuel types. Within a
cover type, e.g., white spruce-paper birch, fire
behavior is estimated according to how fast it
travels and how easily it can be controlled in an
average stand. A fuel type occupies an area in
which the vegetative material is classified ac-
cording to how fast fire will spread in it and how
easily the fire can be controlled, regardless of
the cover type. Fire control men prefer to use
the fuel type classification system as it is both
more precise and more flexible.
To date, no fuel type classification system
has been established for Alaska. The cover type
classifications used and the relation of each type
to fire are described in this chapter.
FUEL DESCRIPTION
SIZE
The initial advance of any forest fire is
usually through such fine fuels as grass, moss,
or dry leaves. Heavy fuels, such as down logs,
may slow the advance of a fire by being a bar-
rier between the flame and the fine fuels ahead
of it. Moisture content of large fuels does not
fluctuate with temperature and humidity as fast
as that of fine fuels. In general, the ratio of
surface area to volume determines how rapidly
the moisture content of a fuel fluctuates with
the change in such weather factors as tempera-
ture and humidity. This ratio is much higher in
a blade of grass than in a limb or a log.
Mosses, lichens, and grass, in combination
or separately, are found throughout the vegetal
range of Alaska. ‘'Moss'' is a loosely used term;
as a general term it includes many species of
lichens, which are at least as fine as the moss
species and probably more flammable. Moss
grows nearly everywhere that any vegetation
grows, and is an extremely finely divided fuel.
A slight rise in temperature, a decrease in rela-
39
tive humidity, and a spark are all that are
needed to ignite it. The influence of heat radia-
tion is similarly more rapid on ignition of moss
than on other fuels.
The prevailing fuel types through which an
initial fire front advances in Alaska may be
made up of finer fuel particles and these may
have a higher rate-of-spread classification than
an average fuel type in most other States.
CONTINUITY
Within the vegetative zone, Alaska has a
nearly continuous expanse of ground fuels.
Mosses, grasses, and lichens are found in some
combination everywhere except on rivers, lakes,
or barren areas. In most other localities in the
United States, horizontal continuity is broken by
such factors as bare soil under brush stands,
roads, or cultivated lands. Needles under a well-
pruned timber stand support a much slower rate
of spread than does moss.
Crown fires in Alaska are not unusual; the
nature of the timber stands presents an excellent
opportunity for crowning to occur. Cover type
descriptions point out the fact that the climax
spruce stands, both white and black, are typi-
cally close-grown with branches drooping to the
ground. The branches often support a heavy
growth of beard lichens, which adds greatly to
the amount of fine fuel that carries fire upward.
These conditions complete the pattern of com-
plete horizontal and vertical continuity simulta-
neously. In other words, if a fire gets under a
stand of spruce timber, the chances are excel-
lent that it will climb the tree, and, if much wind
is present, will spread from tree to tree through
the crowns.
This situation is intensified by the fact that
spruce needles easily become detached when
heated and ignited, and float ahead to acceler-
ate the already rapid spread. In a spruce-birch
stand, the highly flammable birch bark further
intensifies the tendency for a fire to spread
rapidly through the crowns; decadent and over-
mature birch trees are particularly dangerous.
COVER TYPE CLASSIFICATION
The following descriptions of cover types
closely follow those of Lutz (1956), but the rela-
tion between the cover type and actual fire be-
havior within the type is derived primarily from
Robinson.
EARLY STAGES IN FOREST SUCCESSION
Paper birch (Betula papyrifera). — This
species generally forms even-aged stands. With-
in 80 years white spruce often becomes promi-
nent as an understory component. By 120 years
the spruce begins to dominate the stand. Barring
major disturbances, the stand eventually be-
comes a white spruce-paper birch forest. Fire
tends to perpetuate the birch but reduce the
spruce. Birch is typically found over millions of
acres as codominant with spruce. The birch tends
to open up and have fairly heavy ground cover.
Birch stands seldom sustain fire unless some
spruce is in mixture with it. Once started, how-
ever, fires burn readily in stands containing birch
because of the oily, highly flammable bark,
which permits flames to race up the trees into
the crowns and send sparks and chunks of
bark ahead.
.
Bk
y
\
Yes
ava
Figure 30. — Lichens promote crowning.
Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). —
The history of an aspen stand is very similar to
that of paper birch. On excessively dry south
and west slopes, aspen may persist indefinitely.
36
Aspen is relatively short lived, living from 80 to
100 years; it serves primarily as a nurse crop
for white spruce. Aspen is seldom found in any
extensive areas as codominant with spruce. It
tends to have a shallow, clean ground cover,
and prunes itself quite rapidly. For this reason,
aspen stands are typically more fire resistant
than other types.
h aye say? ‘
RIG GH ee -
n Wr Hf a? .
Figure 32. — Vertical continuity of fuel.
Balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera). —
This species forms essentially pure stands on re-
cently deposited alluvium. (Northern black cot-
tonwood is considered a part of this general
type.) Following fires, balsam poplar may in-
vade upland areas beside large streams. It may
occupy flood plains indefinitely if they frequently
receive new deposits of silt. However, on stable
sites white spruce gradually gains dominance.
As small trees the poplars are subject to fire
damage, but above 30 feet in height they be-
come well pruned and are progressively less
susceptible to fire damage; as a bottomland type
it does not comprise a true fire hazard.
Willow-alder (Salix spp.-Alnus spp.). —
Such a complex is not necessarily related to the
early stages of succession, but it is included with
the other hardwood stands. Willow is found
along banks of rivers and intermittent streams
and extends to the treeless plains of the Arctic.
Alder is found along rivers and at brush lines on
mountain slopes. These two species do not tend
to carry fire unless extremely dry weather prevails
and high winds are blowing. When they do
burn, they burn hot and thus increase the resis-
tance to control.
SECONDARY STAGES IN FOREST SUCCESSION
White spruce-paper birch (Picea glauca-
Betula papyrifera.). — This type is more ad-
vanced than either the paper birch or quaking
aspen types. It may develop immediately after
fires or it may result from gradual entry of white
spruce into an originally paper birch stand. Bar-
ring disturbance, a pure relatively open spruce
stand will result. Fire tends to perpetuate the
birch but reduce the spruce. The horizontal and
vertical continuity of fuel, accompanied by the
flammable birch bark, causes this type to be
very susceptible to high rates of fire advance,
both along the ground and into and through
the tree crowns.
White spruce-quaking aspen. — Develop-
ment of this type is analogous to that of the
white spruce-paper birch type except that aspen
dies out rapidly at about 60 years, while birch
will remain for 100 to 130 years. The aspen is
reestablished easily after a fire, chiefly because
of its capacity to produce root suckers.
37
CLIMAX FORESTS
White spruce (Picea glauca).—White spruce
becomes climax on well-drained land. Young
stands are usually even-aged, but may become
uneven-aged with maturity. White spruce fol-
lowing immediately after a fire tends to be
dense, but if it develops as a replacement of
aspen, birch, or poplar it is likely to be relatively
open. It is probably longer lived than other trees
in Interior Alaska; ages up to 300 years are not
uncommon. An occasional tree may attain a 28-
inch diameter and a height of 90 feet. However,
an average-sized tree would be more nearly 14
inches in diameter and 70 to 80 feet in height.
Single, light surface fires do not destroy the
stand but create openings for the invasion of
hardwood species. Repeated severe fires may
cause an area to become essentially treeless,
supporting only herbaceous or shrub communi-
ties, sometimes developing into an aspen or
birch stand. Revegetation following fire is
rapid; bare areas are rarely seen. The out-
standing effects of fires are that (1) most
amounts of existing timber are destroyed and
(2) the subclimax types (principally quaking as-
pen and paper birch) are, at least temporarily,
greatly increased at the expense of the white
spruce type.
In a white spruce stand the trees have
heavy, narrow crowns extending to the ground,
except trees in mature stands may often have
the lower limbs pruned. On dry slopes and in
the higher benchlands, white spruce tends to be-
come an open woodland type of growth, where
shorter height, broader crowns, and branches
extending to the ground tend to persist through
maturity. In open stands grass, dwarf birch,
Laborador tea, and sedges are typical, as is a
heavy continuous ground cover of moss. In dense
stands, moss may be heavy along with needles,
branchwood, and species of Vaccinium.
Black spruce (Picea mariana).—Black spruce
can be termed a physiographic climax. It grows
on poorly drained areas in relatively flat valley
bottoms, on flat to gently rolling land, and on
cold slopes having a northern exposure. It forms
pure stands of usually small, slow-growing trees.
Permafrost is often found at depths of only 12
, spruce
1
small spruce understory
A, aspen stand; B,
Ecological succession from aspen to pure white spruce stand
Figure 33.
; D, aspen is nearly eliminated.
has become dominant
38
to 18 inches. Without fire this spruce is self-
perpetuating both by layering and seeding. Even
after a single intense fire it usually regenerates;
but if fires are repeated often, the area may be-
come a treeless community supporting
Reentry of black
spruce may then be very slow. The trees are
short, small in diameter, and have full-length,
narrow crowns. On excessively dry valley bot-
toms or low benchlands, black spruce tends to
grow in extensive areas of dense thicket type
stands 20 to 30 feet high, and be so dense that
human penetration is impossible. With its typi-
cal moss ground cover, a black spruce site is an
explosive fire type. Most of the excessive rates
sage-
rush-grass, or low shrubs.
of spread recorded on going fires occurred in
black spruce stands (ch. 7).
Grass.—Grass, a typical flash fuel, is found
throughout Alaska from valley bottom to ridge-
tops and in unbroken continuity from small
patches to single areas of hundreds of square
miles. Grasses and sedges are an integral part
of all muskeg types. In southwestern Alaska
grasslands Calamagrostis may be 6 to 8 feet
high with a 12- to 15-inch surface accumulation
of down grass, or ‘rough.’ Fire spread in
Alaskan grasses is similar to that elsewhere.
Winterkilled grass burns at a flash rate of spread
in spring before new growth occurs. In late fall
after killing frosts, the spread rate again in-
creases.
Muskeg.—Muskeg denotes a poorly drained
site regardless of where it occurs topographically.
It carries an association of heavy sphagnum
mosses, tussocks of sedges, grass, various heath
plants, brush, and black spruce; minor surfaces
or better drained ridges within a muskeg may
carry birch or white spruce. The term ‘‘muskeg’’
is also used to include swamps or bogs contain-
ing hundreds of potholes, sloughs, or lakes.
Wherever subsurface drainage is blocked, a mus-
keg association develops even on moderate
slopes and ridgetops.
muskeg
As an ecological term,
is limited generally to peat-forming
vegetation in Alaska and northwestern Canada.
Moss found in muskegs may be from several
inches to several feet deep carrying recognizable
plant structure to those depths (peat does not).
The moss and lichen types comprise a specific
and difficult fire problem because their flashy
39
ih Baggy”:
oo]
8. ty REO %
Montes
Figure 34. — Small black spruce stand near Gulkena.
Figure 35. — Typical grass type on lower Kenai Peninsula.
characteristics contribute to rapid surface spread,
and their organic mass requires extensive dig-
ging in order to stop or extinguish the deep,
slow-burning fires. Drought conditions such as
those in 1957 and 1958 may cause extreme dry-
ness of moss ground cover to depths of several
feet.
Tundra.—The tundras mark the limit Si
arborescent vegetation; they consist of black
mucky soil with a generally frozen subsoil, but
support a dense growth of mosses, lichens, and
dwarf turflike herbs and shrubs. The treeless
area in the Bering Sea and Arctic littorals is
largely covered by tundra.
Peat and muck.—Peat material can be clas-
sified as woody, fibrous, or sedimentary; the
type depends upon the degree of decomposition
and the method of its accumulation. Muck is any
peat material, altered by such features as aera-
tion, drainage, or micro-organism action or culti-
vation that causes so great a decomposition that
its original botanical character is no longer evi-
dent. These types are not particularly pertinent
to fire control except that they may hold smolder-
ing fire for a long time. Quenching a fire in them
is extremely difficult because the materials
smolder similarly to punk or rotten wood.
FUEL TYPE CLASSIFICATION
Formal fuel type mapping or classification
has not been done in Interior Alaska. However,
through experience and observation of the man-
ner in which different types of fuels burn under
various conditions of slope and aspect, Robinson
prepared a preliminary rate-of-spread classifi-
cation for Alaskan fuel types. Table 10 shows
generally the relative speed at which fires ignite
and burn in the major fuel types.
Figure 36. —- Tundra type, Steese Highway.
Table 10.—Rate-of-spread classifications for Alaskan fuel types’
FUcIMtype Valley bottom Benchland Slopes Ridastope
Wet Dry Wet Dry Southerly Northerly
White spruce or
birch-spruce M H H E E H E
White birch or
birch-aspen M H H E E H E
Black spruce H E H E-F E-F H H
Aspen M M M M H M M-H
Cottonwood L M L M M M
Willow-alder M M M H H M M
Grass E F F F F F iF
Muskeg M H H E F H E
Tundra M H H E E-F H E-F
'Rate of spread:
Based on Bl of 40:
40
L=low, M=medium, H=high, E=extreme, F=flash.
3 m.p.h. wind; 30 percent relative humidity; severity index 8; today’s slat moisture content 6 percent.
CHAPTER 5
FIRE-DANGER RATING
USE OF FIRE-WEATHER INFORMATION
Fire-danger rating techniques have been
used widely in National Forests and other protec-
tion organizations for more than 20 years. Each
general region has developed its own system of
integrating into meters or tables the primary
factors that influence the start and spread of
fires.
Prior to 1956, Interior Alaska had no formal
system of fire-danger rating, and thus no basis
upon which to build a fire-danger rating system.
Fire control officers relied upon their personal
judgment and experience to estimate the effect
of the fire weather for the current day and for
the previous several days on preparedness and
suppression activities. The younger men in the
expanding fire control organization needed a re-
liable guide upon which to base their decisions.
The Intermountain fire-danger rating sys-
tem was introduced in 1956 without any modifi-
cations as an interim measure in order (1) to
interpret weather information in an orderly fash-
ion for use in fire control work, and (2) to ob-
tain research data during the period of the sys-
tem's operation for eventual incorporation into a
better system, which would be designed in ac-
cordance with local conditions (Hardy and
Brackebusch 1959).
After using the Intermountain system for
2 years, experienced observers noted that the
burning index meter did not react to actual field
changes as fast as was necessary. Appalachian
slats were then substituted for the half-inch dow-
els (fig. 38) that comprise the fuel moisture in-
put to the Model 8 meter. This change permitted
the burning index to react faster, more in keep-
ing with the rapid changes in the fire-carrying
characteristics of the finely divided, high surface-
area-to-volume Alaskan fuels.
Information from the Model 8 meter can be
used satisfactorily by referring to the rate-of-
spread computations shown in table 11 (Barrows
1951; Fahnestock 1951). For Alaskan fuels and
burning conditions, however, the perimeter in-
41
crease figures can be only approximate and rela-
tive until data from local research make possible
a more reliable revision.
To explain the above statement: fires
burned through black spruce stands in Interior
Alaska at a rate of 120 to 600 chains per hour
when the burning index was between 28 and
37,5 while in southern Idaho fires burned through
cheatgrass stands at a rate of 142 to 248 chains
per hour when the burning index was between
78 and 93.6
By 1960, 14 fire-weather stations were op-
erating throughout Interior Alaska. No great
increase in the number of stations is likely in the
near future because of the limited number of
personnel available. Reliable observers, located
near centers of use, with access to adequate
long-distance communications are as necessary
as proper locations and well-maintained instru-
ments (Hardy, Syverson, Dieterich 1955).
The following tabulation compares the num-
ber of stations and areas involved Interior
Alaska and Region 1 of the U.S. Forest Service.”
in
Region 1,
Alaska USFS
Number of stations 14 175
Total area
involved (acres) 225,000,000 32,000,000
Average area per
station (acres) 18,750,000 182,857
Area ratio ] 100
Even with the large number of stations in
Region 1, the personnel are continually endeav-
oring to interpret fire weather from a permanent
fire-weather station to specific sites on going
5With half-inch sticks, or 33 and 59 with slats.
6Traylor, R. E. Processed report of a study of eight fires in
southern Idaho, 1959; on file at Northern Forest Fire Labora-
tory, Missoula, Montana. (Burning index based on half-inch
sticks.)
7Montana, northern Idaho, northeastern Washington, and
northwestern South Dakota.
Table 11.—Average initial rate of spread' according to fuel type, slope steepness, and burning index
at site of fire?
Fuel rate of Slope
Burning index
spread type steepness? 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100
Percent Perimeter increase (chains per hour)
Low 0-10 0) ] ] 4 1 ] 2 2 2 3 4
11-25 0) ] ] ] 2 2 3 3 4 6
26-50 ] ] 2 2 3 3 4 4 6 8
51-75 ] 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 9 13
Over 75 2 3 4 5 6 Vf 8 10 15 20
Medium 0-10 0) ] ] ] 2 2 2 3 4 5
IJE25 ] ] ] 2 2 3 3 4 6 W/
26-50 ] 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 8 10
51-75 2 3 3 4 5 6 yf 9 13 16
Over 75 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 15 20 P25)
High 0-10 6) ] 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 12
11-25 ] ] 3 4 6 7 9 1] 13 7
26-50 2 2 4 6 8 10 12 16 18 24
51-75 3 3 6 9 13 16 19 25 28 38
Over 75 4 6) 10 15 20 25 30 40 45 60
Extreme 0-10 ] 3 4 5 6 8 10 13 16 19
11-25 ] 4 6 Uf 9 1] 14 19 22 27
26-50 2 6 8 10 12 16 20 26 32 38
§1-75 3 9 13 16 19 25 32 4] 50 60
Over 75 5 15 20 25 30 40 50 65 80 95
Flash 0-10 ] 5 12 15 19 24 30 37 46 SV/
11-25 ] 7, 17 21 27 34 42 By) 65 81
26-50 2 10 24 30 38 48 60 74 92 114
51-75 3 16 38 48 60 76 95 Melz4 146 181
Over 75 5 25 60 75 95 120 150 185 230 285
lAverage initial rate of spread refers to perimeter increase
be anticipated during the first 4 to 5 hours.
2Table based upon study of 2,955 fires in National Forests, R-1,
have been estimated.
3General descriptions used in slope descriptions are: Level,
Steep, 51-75 percent; Very steep, over 75 percent.
fires or prescribed burns (Barrows 1951). It will
never be possible to have such an intensive
coverage of fire-weather stations in Alaska be-
cause of the sparse settlement, lack of perma-
nent personnel, and lower order of resource
utilization. However, for purposes not requiring
daily measurement, recording weather stations
may soon be used to fill in gaps at important
locations.
between discovery of fire and first attack. This rate of spread may
0-10
42
1936-44. Values for very high and very low burning index
percent; Gentle, 11-25 percent; Moderate, 26-50 percent;
Data collected from the present system of
fire-weather stations in Alaska have assisted re-
search personnel in understanding the general
fire-weather complex that characterizes Alaska’s
interior. Fire-weather information presented in
this publication was obtained from two sources:
fire-weather stations and actual fire data. Use
of the system by fire control personnel has en-
abled them to understand the trend of fire-
weather conditions during the summer much ditions according to cumulative moisture content
better than they could previously. One example and current burning index. Such a table facili-
of such use is evidenced in table 12, which was tates wiser use of equipment and manpower in
devised by fire control officers in Interior Alaska organizing both fire preparation and fire sup-
to indicate progressively worsening burning con- pression activities.
Table 12.—Burning condition classes
| Cumulative
Adjective Briay uel Severity Burning index Burning
description Crater index Intermountain2 Alaska! condition
Percent Class
Low 85 + 0-2 1- 20 1-15 1
| Moderate 71-84 3 21-35 16-25 2
| Average 48-70 4-5 36- 50 26-35 3
| High 36-47 6 51- 70 36-50 4
| Extreme 0-35 7-10 71-100 Sillee 5
1Based on moisture content of Appalachian slats.
2Based on moisture content of half-inch dowel sticks.
USFS
Figure 38. — Appalachian slats (left) and half-inch dowel
sticks (right).
SEASONAL TRENDS IN FIRE WEATHER
Perhaps the reason for the greater-than-ex-
pected rate of spread of fire in black spruce is
due to the fuel itself; perhaps it is due to the
method of determining burning index; or per-
haps it is due to a weather-length @f day com-
plex. The reader should note that such weather
factors as relative humidity, fuel moisture, and
air temperature, do not approach the normally
expected critical points reached in such States
as Montana and Idaho.
The percent of total frequency of each meas-
ured fire-weather factor during the 1958 season
is shown in figure 39 — relative humidity, wind
velocity, fuel moisture (both stick and slat), and
the resultant burning indexes. An overall pattern
becomes apparent that all factors, except wind,
have an increasing percent of occurrences on the
severe side of the line according to this order of
stations: Anchorage, Fort Yukon, Priest River Ex-
perimental Forest, and Fort Howes.
Generally speaking, burning indexes are
slightly higher in Interior Alaska in May and
June than in July and August. The reverse is
true for Montana and northern Idaho (table 13
and fig. 40). Statistics on fire occurrence and
burned area follow the same trend as the burn-
ing index data (refer to figs. 54 and 55). As a
point of interest, the fire season at the other
edge of the United States (Arizona and New
Mexico) also reaches its peak by mid-July, then
begins tapering off.
Table 13.—Percent of total frequency of burning index by general classes,
May-August, 1956-58
Weather ie cane Month Annual!
station gees May June July August ppt.
21- 21- 21- 21-
AO 40 + 40 40+ 40 40+ 40 40+ Inches
Anchorage Stick 48 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.23
Slat 60 7 62 0 27 2 42 0
Fort Yukon Stick 69 6 62 22 60 13 50 0 5.61
Slat 39 61 43 49 64 23 75 1]
Priest River Stick 58 3 46 1 53 30 33 Al 39.45
(Idaho) Slat 0 0 47 26 33 58 27 55
Fort Howes Stick 39 33 32 22 43 50 19 70 10.47
(Montana)
DIURNAL FLUCTUATION OF FIRE-WEATHER
FACTORS
Analysis of fire case histories (ch. 7) revealed
some interesting information about involving the
diurnal fluctuation of fire-weather factors. The
extreme length of daylight in northern latitudes
does not cause relative humidity, temperature, or
fuel moisture to approach the danger point, as
had been supposed previously. Also, the varia-
tion of each factor from the most severe observa-
tion (usually at 1600) during a 24-hour period is
far less than at locations such as Priest River
Experimental Forest (fig. 41).
Ad
Perhaps extended periods of moderate
weather produce comparable conditions in terms
of fire behavior as a short number of hours of
severe weather (see ch. 3). The flat curves of
figure 42 indicate that the extended daylight
period in Alaska does not give fuels much time
in which to cool off and absorb moisture. They
also indicate that the spread of fire can con-
tinue night and day at a relatively uniform rate;
fire-weather factors at night do not become mild
enough for a fire to “lay down" as it usually
does in southerly latitudes.
SOURCE- FIRE-WEATHER RECORDS, AVERAGE SUNE-AUGUST 1958
FIRE-WEATHER FACTOR FREQUENCY
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
%
WIND
VELOCITY
MPH
£ MONTANA
M. /DAHO
ANCHORAGE FORTVUKON PRIEST RIVER FORT HOWES
fl
|
FR & &
AINFNOFASS T4LOL FO
%
FUEL
MOISTURE
HALF INCH STICKS
APPALACHIAN SLATS
lanoal
SNAG
SNS
oc
beara
Figure 39
45
BURNING INDEX FREQUENCY
SOURCE: FIRE-WEATHER RECOROS, AVERAGE 19$6 -1958
HALF /NCH STICK
APPALACHIAN SLAT —vssnnesnes ABOVE AV B/.
BURNING
JUNE INDEX SULY
PRIEST RIVER
Tr)
erneenerrrene
TE] |eceauerecaeene
renueeseeceney
senesneserese
EUutercer
(N.104HO)
|
FT HOWES
(£ MONT)
60 $0 40 30 20
10 10
FREQUENCY OF BURNING INDEX, PERCENT
20 30 40 50 0
Figure 40
; 46
DURATION OF EQUAL FLUCTUATION
F FIRE-DANGER RATING FACTORS
PRIEST RIVER
INTERIOR ALASKA
NORTHERN /OAHO
INTERIOR ALASKA
HALF /NCH $7/CK SLAT MOISTURE
MOISTURE VARIES 2% VARIES 2%
2400 2400
TEMPERATURE RELATIVE HUMID/T¥
VARIES 10°F VARIES 10 7
Figure 41
47
| DIURNAL FLUCTUATION OF FIRE WEATHER |
FUEL MOISTURE PERCENT
3 +10 ,
. a
S + 8 Eo ~ |
Ry es | x
N +4 = N/DAHO STICK 0+ ys a 4
(ee be tla a eee
[AiR TEMPERATURE |
N
=
S
Ve
S ~20
ee (er fies me ied eel ein cl eels ey
mm ae (Om | Vania |e A a AL alee to
kane
Ss
ETE RELATIVE HUMIDITY & DEWPOINT
S iS peal
NS Stes ~ ALASKA R/ ——
N 760 M/IDAHO R/H-—-— __| =|
S \ ALASHALD Pine AG
S 7
é + 40 —— ‘ | |
~N \ /
< \ /
Q \
< egree aes oy,
Srateceuussacdescasta sobs oncesecroen besconscscnesepreecouenee. ie een eeereeree| f
Ql ea | ree cs
iekaates BURNING /NOEX
5 Oe ——— =
=) Esp ea | [SS
S -20 ae | Po Wes
S soneconeeee Sane ae ALASKA-ST/CK Sins ~ K
L730 = t -$LAT ———
gp oe N.IDAHO STICK +77:
HOUR 0400 0800 1200 1600 2000 2400
_ Figure 42
48
CHAPTER 6
FIRE STATISTICS
HISTORICAL
Forest fires have burned in Interior Alaska
for many centuries; their causes were the same
as for fires over the rest of the North American
continent both then and today — lightning and
man. The forests themselves tell the history of
the earliest fires; early explorers and other trav-
elers continue the record until modern times.
Fires in the earliest times were doubtless
caused by both lightning and Indians, with the
greater percentage probably caused by the In-
dians. The extent of man-caused destruction
spiraled upward with the discovery of gold in
1898 in the Klondike country. During single bad
years, fires burned over several million acres.
Railroad and highway construction led to some
of the largest fires in the history of the State
(Lutz 1959).
Ever since the gold rush days, an estimated
annual average of 1 million acres has burned
over in Interior Alaska. Scanning of early reports
reveals that some of the worst fire years, prior
to the beginning of methodical recordkeeping in
1940, were 1898, 1903, 1913, 1915, and 1923.
The fact that apparent burned acreage has not
been reduced in recent years can be attributed to
better reporting and recording procedures. In
earlier days many large burns were never seen,
or at least never reported; so probably the
burned area was much greater than suspected.
Even in Sweden, where forests have been man-
aged and protected for centuries, the number of
fires reported annually increased from 400 to
1,100 during the recent 15-year period of 1944
to 1958 (Stromdahl 1959). The increased accur-
acy in fire reporting in Sweden may explain the
apparent decrease of lightning fires from 50
percent to 10 percent of the total.
Ideas about the general cause of fires in
Interior Alaska have gradually changed. Heintz-
leman (1936) stated, ‘Fires in Alaska are almost
wholly man-caused (lightning being a negligible
factor)... '' Also, the Alaska Fire Control Serv-
ice Annual Report for 1940 stated that there were
no lightning-caused fires in Interior Alaska
(Robinson 1960). Evidence now on hand shows
49
that these statements were in error; they were
made before there was any organized fire pro-
tection force or even reporting procedure. Fires
that actually were started by lightning were
attributed to trappers, miners, and natives. One-
fourth of all fires between 1950 and 1958 were
reported as lightning-caused, and they accounted
for three-fourths of the total acreage burned.
COMPARATIVE STATISTICS
The available data on Alaska forest fires
from 1950 through 1958 present a vivid picture
of the Alaska fire problem, especially when they
are compared with data on forest fires in the
other States during the same period.® Tabulated
data are given in the Appendix (tables 34
through 43) but the conclusions based on these
data are presented in the pages immediately
following. The Alaska fire problem can be best
visualized and understood by direct comparison
of pertinent data about separate but related
phases of the problem.
INTERIOR ALASKA, WITH CONTINENTAL
UNITED STATES
Area Protected
The Bureau of Land Management is respon-
sible for protection of 93 percent of forest land in
Alaska. In the other States, responsibility for
protection is shared by many agencies and as-
sociations. All public domain land in the United
States is protected by the Bureau of Land Man-
agement; 62 percent of this is in Alaska. This
amounts to 27 percent of all land under organ-
ized fire protection in the entire United States
(higz-43),
Areo Burned
Total area of forest land burned annually
in Alaska averages about 1.1]
while the total acreage burned annually on lands
million acres,
8The information presented in this chapter and in chapter
8 is confined to the years 1950 through 1958 since data
prior to that year are incomplete and less accurate. Even so,
records of the last few years, especially 1957 and 1958, are
considerably more reliable than those between 1950 and
1956. Tests of statistical significance for several of the tables
indicated poor correlation; thus all tables based upon analysis
of individual fire reports should be accepted chiefly for the
general information they contain.
managed by all agencies in the other States is
slightly more than 3 million. The area burned
per fire in Alaska averages some 4,400 acres,
whereas, on lands protected by all agencies in
other States, the area burned averages only 30
acres per fire (fig. 43).
Number of Fires
The number of reported fires in Interior
Alaska is only 1.1 per million acres protected,
while for all protected land in the other States
the number is 168 (fig 44). The low number of
tires per unit area protected is in sharp contrast
to the acreage burned per fire as noted in the
preceding paragraph.
Severe and Light Fire Seasons
Number of fires—I!In comparing numbers
of fires between severe and light seasons, we
note that each protection group faces comparable
difficulties. In numbers of fires, Alaska shows a
ratio of 3 fires in a heavy season to 1 in a light
season, whereas in other States this ratio is
about 2 to 1 (fig. 45). Also, at least for the period
of record, both the severest and the lightest sea-
sons in Alaska were not the same years as the
severest and lightest seasons in other States.
Acreage burned.—tThe difference between
acreage burned in severe and light years in
Alaska is far greater than the difference in acre-
age burned in severe and light years in other
States. The ratios are approximately 135 to 1
and 5 to 1, respectively. In Interior Alaska the
greatest number of fires is 1.6 times normal and
the area burned is 4.6 times normal, as opposed
to 1.3 and 2.2 for all protected land in the other
States (fig. 45). The data indicate that an over-
load of fires causes more destruction in Alaska
than in the other States.
The area burned per fire is another indica-
tor of the greater damage encountered in In-
terior Alaska than in other States when fire-
weather conditions become critical. In Interior
Aiaska a fire may then become 3 times as large
as in a normal year and 62 times as large as in
an easy year. Suppression forces on protected
land in other States have been fortunate in hav-
ing sufficient strength to confine the ratio to 1.2
and 2.8, respectively (fig. 46). The percent of
fires that exceeds Class B size — 10 acres — in
worst, normal, and easy years does not vary
50
greatly between areas (fig. 47); the great differ-
ence comes in the size of the fires that do exceed
10 acres, as noted above.
Number of Fires by Specific Cause
Lightning causes 24 percent of all fires in
Alaska and 35 percent in the other States. A
year-by-year record, however, indicates that the
apparent ratio of lightning fires to others in
Alaska is gradually increasing; this is probably
a result of more accurate reporting procedures.
Campfires cause 27 percent of all fires requiring
suppression action in Alaska, but only 4 percent
in other States. Also, in Alaska 21 percent of the
wildland fires are caused by debris burning com-
pared to 14 percent in the other States (fig. 48).
This indicates the same type of activity in Alaska
that occurred in Montana and northern Idaho in
the late 1920's and early 1930's when consider-
able land was being cleared.
Number of Fires by Size Class
A greater percentage of fires is of Class A
size [one-fourth acre or less) on Interior Alaska
lands than on lands protected by the Bureau of
Land Management in the other States — 42
percent compared to 19 percent, respectively.
Both Alaska and other States show a larger per-
centage of Class E fires (larger than 300 acres)
than Class D (100-300 acres). Records indicate
that if a fire is not controlled by the time it
reaches 300 acres in size, it may not be con-
trolled until it reaches several hundred or even
several thousand acres (fig. 49).
Number of Fires per Miliion Acres Protected
Fire occurrence per million acres protected
in Interior Alaska is low compared to that in
other States protected by BLM; an average of
only 1 fire per million acres occurs annually on
Alaskan land while nearly 5 fires per million
acres occur on other BLM lands (fig. 50). This
occurrence ratio contrasts strikingly to the aver-
age acreage burned per fire: 4,400 acres in In-
terior Alaska versus 267 acres on other BLM
lands (fig. 46).
Area Burned According to Fuel Type
The rate-of-spread and resistance-to-control
characteristics of fires in Interior Alaskan vege-
tation is described in reference to cover types
instead of fuel types, as explained in chapter 4.
AREA PROTECT ED
AREA "BURNED
AVERAGE 1950-1958
Ls oe
| areal eee SLM, OTHER ALL AGENCIES
| STATES OTHER STATES
| \
.
| G
| x
6
S
ans S
: .
S4
x
ta $s =
= AREA BURNED
kop N 2 PER FIRE
© x
v 400 1
< 300
\ AREA BURNED
S 200 PER YEAR
AN ;
100
AREA
PROTECTED
Figure 43
pil
NUMBER OF FIRES
AVERAGE 1950 - 1958
Legend
SLM BLM ALL AGENCIES
ALASKA OTHER STATES OTHER STATES
52
seer
THER FIRES
AWN |
o>
tote
“te $8 os
Bo
ecetoten
SRR
ROK
11 4.6 168.0
192 49 W848 “acess PROTECTED
Figure 44
52
NUMBER OF FIRES. “ORS7 _ . season
ACRES BURNED ° Zasiés7° ° 1950-19568
NUMBER _OF FIRES
1S \\
NY norma!
KA —sdOTHER STATES. ~— OTHER STATES
BLM BLM ALL AGENCIES
9
WY pee ARLA
« 7 BURNED 956
EL
> 6)
S74
x 3
iS 2
/
OTHER STATES OTHER STATES
BLM BLM ALL AGENCIES
Figure 45
53
AREA BURNED
PER FIRE
AVERAGE 1950 -/958
etatat
nore”
Sx
Sees
962 NORMAL
1958
Figure 46
54
PERCEN TF
100
80
PERCENT OF FIRES
EXCEEDING {0 ACRES
AVERAGE 1950-1958
1980 & 192
NORMAL
195 WG
=) WORMAL
1986
ALASKA OTHER STATES || OTHER STATES
BLM BLM ALL AGENCIES
Figure 47
5D
FIRES
BLM ALASKA
— =
=
Wa
1950 — 1958
] BLM OTHER
FAILROAD
N Fe
== = ooceee
LNDIARY | LUMBERING
cok| ok a
INC.
BY SPECIFIC CAUSE
AVERAGE
AL lilalditaldidla 9% |
Padilla AND PERCENT OF
il HH ort Serhieres s HEPES
YlW0da HHH@@@@@E@~PEX@YT MEC@M J
came S
Reefs SSS GS BS S S = 8
ees: Oe Se ooo
SIININ iNiodse
Figure 48
; 56
S958
a
i §
<i
>)
ad
N
Sy
aS
AVERAGE 1950
nf
nd
Te
LL
S
4
Ld
tO
=
>
2
| SLM, ALASKA
S
N
S
:
8
200
WMA.
Md a
Te — cotta
Se NOs
Figure 49
57
aq
=
al
S
S? ce
o™
read
a
os
oe <
as
25
= =_
=
ce
Vat
| ae
AVERAGE 1950-1958
BLM, ALASKA
| BLM, OTHER
MMMM
Mon
HHY@H@_ CM TUM
iti’
LLL hey
x
e2gessggsssssss Ga
YSIGW/7?N
Figure 50
58
The cover types in Alaska do not correspond to
those in continental United States; therefore, no
valid comparison of area burned can be made
without modifying some terminology. In conti-
nental United States rate of spread is greatest in
grass fuels. A large share of the lands protected
by the Bureau of Land Management in continen-
tal United States is covered with grass; the next
largest acreage is brushland. In Interior Alaska,
grassland comprises a small percent of the total
acreage; much of that is on the Kenai peninsula
where lightning incidence is very low, accessibil-
ity is relatively good, and fire danger seldom be-
comes critical.
Tundra and related fuels are not included
on fire reports; fires in tundra are arbitrarily
classed in the ‘‘Other'’ fuel type category. Rate
of spread in this complex is as great as, if not
greater than, rate of spread in the grass type.
The information in figure 51 would be more re-
alistic if most of the BLM Alaska acreage that is
now listed in ‘Other’ fuels were placed in the
Grass’ category.
Seventy-four percent of the acreage burned
in Interior Alaska is in forest or tundralike fuels.
Eighty-eight percent of the acreage burned on
other BLM protected lands is in brush and grass
fuels. Forty percent of the acreage burned in
Interior Alaska is in forest fuels, compared with
only 7 percent on other BLM protected land. A
relatively greater strength-of-attack force is
needed for controlling fires in forested land.
INTERIOR ALASKA, WITH SOUTHEASTERN
ALASKA
Up to this point all of the statistics have
referred only to Interior Alaska. The differences
in weather factors and fire loads between the
two sections of the State make this understand-
able. The brief tabulation below compares the
Precipitation patterns of Interior Alaska with
those of southeastern Alaska; it reveals two
entirely different climatic situations. Interior
Alaska has been termed ‘‘the green desert,’ but
southeastern Alaska approaches a rain forest
condition.
Interior Normal annual Southeastern Normal annual
stations precipitation stations precipitation
Inches Inches
Fort Yukon 6.54 Seward 68.08
Fairbanks Ua ey Juneau 90.25
Anchorage 14.27 Sitka 96.33
Bethel 18.17 Ketchikan 1593
59
Past fire records place nearly all the Alaska
fire incidence and burned area within the Interior
(table 14).
Abundance of precipitation in the southeast
accounts for the heavy stands of Sitka spruce
and western hemlock timber. Much of it is
overmature: this indicates relative freedom from
tire. But many stands in southeastern Alaska do
show evidence of fire in their age and species
composition.
Fire potential in the southeast increases as
timber is cut. Large volumes of logging slash
accumulate and expose the ground surface to
insolation and rapid drying; this encourages
growth of flammable grass and annual weeds.
The number of people in and near the woods
also increases as utilization increases.
The most urgent task is to reduce the
annual burned area in Interior Alaska from
the present 1,119,130 acres. However, the fire
potential in the southeastern section must be
realized; collection of certain elements of back-
ground information there will be of value to any
fire research program that may ultimately be
established.
WITHIN INTERIOR ALASKA
Lightning and Man-Caused Fires
Only 24 percent of all forest fires in Alaska
are lightning caused, while 76 percent of the
acreage burned is due to lightning fires (fig. 52).
Inadequate storm detection and difficult acces-
sibility contribute to the high area-to-incidence
ratio. Probably the greatest fire control chal-
lenge is to reduce the acreage of lightning fires
to approach the incidence percentage. Early de-
tection and fast attack facilities will help bring
the acreage burned into line with the number of
fires.
Fires on Which No Suppression Action Was Taken
Several interesting but often confusing sta-
tistics result from comparing the group of fires
on which suppression action was taken with the
group that burned completely unrestricted. Al-
ready mentioned is the fact that control action
cannot be taken on some fires because: (1) they
are physically inaccessible; (2) they are so large
when discovered that no reasonable force of
men could stop them (economically inaccessible);
(3) limited manpower makes it imperative to
TWOUSAND ACRES
AREA BURNED
BY FUEL TYPE
AVERAGE 1950-1958
771328
RQ Qa”
BLM ALASKA
BLM OTHER
_ Figure 51
60
NUMBER AREA BURNED
200 900
175 Me 800
Qe 150 S 700
Wp XX 600
~Q Q 500
ss 100 = ;
D 75 SH 300
— S
50 Q
NN 200
25 \ 100
NUMBER OF FIRES
AND AREA BURNED
BY GENERAL CAUSE
Table 14.—Fire statistics, Interior versus Southeastern Alaska
Lightning Man-caused Total
Interior Southeast Interior Southeast Interior Southeast
Number Acres Number Acres Number Acres Number Acres Number Acres Number Acres
1940-49 200 no data 1 o+ 938 nodata 292 1,649 1,138 12,411,076 293 1,649
1950-58 546 7,665,726 3 1 1,734 2,406,442 234 5,738 2,280 10,072,168 237 52739
1950-58 Av. 61 851,747 0.3 o+ 193 267 ,382 26 638 253 IANS NSO 26 638
Source: Southeast: National Forest Fire Reports, USDA, Forest Service.
Interior: Annual Reports of the Director (Statistical Appendix).
choose between fires when many start during a
short period; and (4) under a general smoke pall
some fires burn without being detected.
Thirty-three percent of all lightning fires are
never attacked, while only 9 percent of man-
caused fires are not; however, the actual number
of no-action fires per year is about the same for
both general causes. This 9 percent accounts for
68 percent of the area burned by man-caused
fires.
A lightning fire usually is 10 times the size
of a man-caused fire; but an average no-action
lightning fire is only 1% times the size of a
no-action man-caused fire. Many lightning fires
are held down in early stages by such elements
of moderate weather as clouds, high humidity,
and precipitation; this is not often true for man-
caused fires. Table 15 and figure 53 contain the
specific information for the above discussion.
Why an average no-action lightning fire is
only slightly larger than an action lightning fire
can lead to many conjectures. A partial explana-
tion can be: (1) the more potentially dangerous
fires are attacked first; (2) action not taken be-
cause known barriers may restrict the fires to
small size; and (3) initial attack on some action
fires occurs after they have beceme too large to
control; they are subsequently abandoned —
hence, large acreages appear on the action fire
side of the ledger that otherwise would have
been charged against no-action fires. The per-
centage of lightning fires upon which no action
was taken has been materially reduced since
1956.
Table 15.—Fires receiving suppression action
Type of fire eee ae Total area burned ete ren
Acres Percent Acres Ratio
Lightning No action 20 303,214 15,161
Action 4] 549,574 13,404
Total 61 852,788 76 13,980 10
Man-caused No action 17 181,514 10,677
Action 176 84,828 482
Total 193 266,342 24 1,380 ]
Total 254 1,119,130 4,406
Monthly Variation in Fire Frequency and Size
Lightning fires——Virtually no lightning fires
occur before mid-May or after the end of August.
Eighty-eight percent of all lightning fires start
during June and July. Class D fires are a very
small percentage of the total number of lightning
fires in any one month, but the number of Class
E fires is consistently greater than that for any
other class (fig. 54).
Man-caused fires——The frequency pattern
for man-caused fires deviates considerably from
that of the lightning fire (fig. 54). For nearly all
NUMBER OF FIRES AND ACREAGE BURNED
BASED ON WHETHER
SUPPRESSION ACTION WAS TAKEN
AVERAGE 1950-1958
ACTION Fee=| [___] Wo ACTION
NUMBER
400
:
SS
Se
Q
i
<
SQ
.
ACTION
NO ACTION
Figure 53
63
MONTHLY VARIATION
IN SIZE CLASS OF FIRES
AVERAGE” ~1950 279 5E
ae Ol Ee Ba |
CLASS Lael Gs 3 me
PERCENT LIGHTNING oe eae ae
20
sides ia Oto ote ike 10
a
SI [WE]
|
| (eT
3 [SEASON| 61 FIRES
—orecenr MAN-CAUSED ee AVERAGE WUMBER |
Pee ee 10 20 30 40 50 60
| Ee, APRIL
ale Sees eerey eS]
| et
JUNE
Y | JULY
AUGUST
m= _ SLPT.
SN
A NOV.
Pee
sae 192 FIRES
ee ET ee ed
Figure 54
of the season the greatest percentage of the fires
caused by man is Class A. Fifty-seven percent of
the fires occur in May and June — a month
earlier than for lightning fires; land-clearing op-
erations are a major reason for this early peak-
load. Only a few fires occur in October and
November, but a larger percentage of them
reaches Class E size because the entire detection
and control force has been drastically reduced
by this time.
Acreage burned.—The record of actual acre-
age burned in each month (fig. 55) shows clearly
that the small number of Class E fires during
May, June, and July accounts for most of the
total amount. Seventy-three percent of all acre-
age burned by lightning fires occurs in June.
Seventy percent of all acreage burned by man-
caused fires occurs in May. Lightning fires con-
tinue to burn much larger acreages in July than
do man-caused fires; in fact, July lightning fires
burn almost the same acreage as man-caused
fires do in May.
Yearly Variation in Fire Frequency and Size
For the 9-season period studied, the gener-
alization could be made that as the total number
of fires increased, the number of Class E fires
also increased, and the number of Class A fires
decreased. This relationship is partly due to
overloading of the fire control organization and
partly due to many fires reaching such large size
that no effective suppression action could be
taken. The percentage of the Class B, C, and D
fires does not vary greatly from year to year;
the main difference in percentage is between
Class A and Class E fires (fig. 56). The area-
burned-per-fire record for 1957 — the worst year
— and 1955 — the easiest year (fig. 46) — falls
within this number-size class relationship.
Distribution of Fires
Fire control strategy cannot be planned
properly without first knowing where and when
fires are most likely to occur. Bases must be
established and personnel deployed and shifted
according to this knowledge. Data from the anal-
ysis of fires from 1950 through 1958 were insuf-
ficient to make detailed occurrence isograms for
individual years or for separate size classes;
however, figures 57 and 58 show the number of
man-caused fires and lightning fires per million
acres for this period.
Most man-caused fires burn near population
centers and along the primary highways connect-
ing these principal cities (fig. 57). Exceptions to
this general rule are such towns as Tanana and
Fort Yukon. No roads go near these towns, but
in Alaska they are still centers of population or
distribution points.
Distribution of lightning fires (fig. 58) ap-
pears somewhat similar to that for man-caused
fires in respect to their apparent concentrations
near the larger towns and along the primary
highways—particularly around Fairbanks, Tana-
cross, and the connecting road. Other apparent
centers of lightning fire frequency are near Kot-
zebue, Galena, McGrath, and between Eagle
and Central along the Canadian border. The
scatter of fires was so great that this table at
best could show only an approximation.
If complete detection coverage were pos-
sible, the lightning fire isogram might appear
considerably different. Over the past many
years, detection and reporting have been almost
entirely by such volunteers as airplane pilots,
travelers, local residents, and miners. We now
know that many lightning fires occur in areas
for which the isogram indicates a low frequency.
Some of these fires burn large areas, and some
may combine with other fires and appear as
only one for reporting purposes. Others burn
and die out without being reported. Many fires
do not spread beyond a very small size, and
their existence is never known. Better detection
and better reporting methods will no doubt
change the pattern of the lightning fire isogram
during the next few years. More information
pertaining to fire distribution according to size
class and distance from headquarters appears
in chapter 8.
THOUSAND ACRES
600
550
RN
S
rs
Ss
bs
8
ASS)
Ss
Ss
tS
s
ACREAGE BURNED BY MONTH
LIGHTNING AND MAW-CAUSED HIRES
AVERAGE 1950-1958
[AREA BURNED
—- LIGHTNING FIRES
—— —MAN-CAUSED FIRES
TOTAL FIRES
% Of AREA BURNED
L/GHTM/NG FIRES
( MAN-CAUSED FIRES
[-] 7O7AL FIRES
APRIL
Figure 55
66
YEARLY VARIATION
IN SIZE CLASS OF FIRES
AVERAGE 1950-1958
NUMBER
Ss
1950
952
£8 NS!
956
1950 |
ITE a
a
1956
ee
>
>
x
a
Maa)
100 200 300 400 500
be
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE 1, 250 000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
GUARD STATION
=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
MAN-CAUSED FIRES PER MILLION
AGRES, ALL SIZE CLASSES
AVERAGE 1950-1958
Figure 57
rm" ~
*
=. J os
, :
I
+
RS
z
. _
: aa
f i
us -
- = i> =
> i ~
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE | 250.000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
149 MILES
——
150 KILOMETERS
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
— LEGEND
5 SU ONL gm i hs (Vane ern \ Se ® CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
PAY ot GBT area 5 es z med AAV En PSAP POSH Ove
m= =OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
& DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
& GUARD STATION
mm=—= PRIMARY HIGHWAY
MAN-CAUSED FIRES PER MILLION
ACRES, ALL SIZE CLASSES,
AVERAGE /950-/958
B34 {
Cee ey
We
Nye
fot 2 ene MINCH
yf or A ET; z }
: ; Ae aA res
@ SUM ay ee "
Rt
eet
‘tie: 4® fires
etree is oe
®\ NAKNEK
= ee ear
ee ASCE
fig ‘ ie
ale Bes \
ng aT, )
he aah ae
WO NATIT me a
Figure 57
“
7
.
|
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES. SCALE |. 250 000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES.
150 MILES
} aioe DATUM IS MEAly SEA LeveL
> LEGEND
bh @ CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
Nice OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
as Oi Be DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
ee) GUARD STATION
| ie == PRIMARY HIGHWAY
ACRES. AVERAGE NUMBER PER
YEAR; ALL SIZE CLASSES.
Pye sy FIRES PER MILLION
1950 - 1958
ON
q Boe
veh es Le
Figure 58
on
At
e
i
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1: 250000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
50 150 MILES
=r =
£0 > 150 NILOMETERS
= =
Scan
aan DATUM IS MEAN) SEA LEVEL
— LEGEND
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
GUARD STATION
s==== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
Bye FIRES PER MILLION
ACRES, AVERAGE NUMBER PER
YEAR, ALL SIZE CLASSES.
1950 - 1/958
MINA
Zz
CGRATH Beet a ae Oh
& GJANNALLEN
ae a5 id
7
7. 3 ea =
5 ny y ay,
“7 C.
oe wy boi
(4. Meas es
Z
7
a ee ‘ LP =
" & SKILA 4 Princo fs.
2%, 5 hain ra “et * a:
Aig (aE BY aint? [GG money ht
+f @ ILIAMNA >). MoE cia
Figure 58
CHAPTER 7
FIRE CASE HISTORIES
Why do fires in Interior Alaska get so large
so fast? What is the actual rate of perimeter and
forward spread? What weather factors are as-
sociated with various rates of spread? And, is
the rate of spread significantly different between
fuel types?
Preliminary investigation of research needs
showed an almost complete lack of recorded
data in the form of weather, fuels, or behavior
that would aid in answering these questions.
In 1958 a case history study of fires in Interior
Alaska was started. During that and the follow-
ing year, two 2-man teams, equipped with port-
able fire-weather stations (fig. 59), gathered
data from 19 fires; case histories of seven are
presented here (fig. 60).
Figure 59. — Portable fire-weather station.
69
The most valuable data were collected dur-
ing the free-burning period before control action
altered the spread rate of the fires. Thus, data
for several of the fires cover a period of only a
few hours, even though the fires may have
spread for a much longer time. Results of this
study indicate that nearly all extreme behavior
can be explained qualitatively but not quantita-
tively.
HEALY FIRE
The Healy fire burned 40,320 acres because
of continual high winds. Healy is on the lee side
of a major pass in the Alaska Range, between
the Anchorage-Susitna River area and the Ne-
nana River-Fairbanks area. Prevailing winds
augment night downslope winds and override
daytime upslope wind tendencies. Nonuniform
topography downwind may also have caused
erratic local winds and eddies.
The fire originated in a coal seam that had
been smouldering for several years. At the time
of discovery, midafternoon on July 4, 1958, it
covered 50 acres. By 2300 it had increased to
100 acres, and was burning on steep, rocky
terrain covered with black spruce, brush, and
dense grass.
Excerpts from the narrative report of the fire
indicate the influence of the continual high winds
in thwarting early control:
The wind made it almost impos-
sible to do anything for about the first
two weeks of the fire... 34 of the
time men on the ground couldn't keep
ahead of the fire...
After five inches of rain and four
days since the last smoke, we felt rea-
sonably safe and left the Healy wind
tunnel.
Weather and behavior records collected by
the team after its arrival on July 8 showed that
the major runs occurred on July 9, 10, and 11,
although relative humidity was rarely below 50
percent and burning index was around 20. The
worst burning condition prevailed on July 26
(32 percent relative humidity, burning index 44);
however, since control was near there was no
appreciable spread. One topographic feature
hampering control of the fire was a bald moun-
tain that caused the fire to split and form two
heads. A note at the July 8/2200 reading indi-
cates an interesting general wind situation: “The
smoke is still being carried away by the fast
surface winds, but as it reaches the flat country
at the base of the mountain the smoke rises and
forms huge cloud formations."
The fire was declared under control
August 1.
on
MURPHY DOME FIRE
No single factor can be pinpointed as the
major cause of this fire that scorched 13,300
acres. Broken topography to the lee of a broad
valley, cumulus clouds and even thunderstorms
in the vicinity, and high burning indexes all
contributed at various times. This lightning fire
started on July 2, 1958, and covered 3 acres at
discovery time the next morning. When initial
attack forces arrived 5 hours later, it was at 500
acres, and by evening was 1,500 acres. The
primary fuel at first attack was heavy black
spruce, with a light understory of grass, brush,
and deadwood. The fire burned through some
birch and aspen stands, and near the top of
Murphy Dome raced through a gradually thin-
ning tundra cover.
Weather records show that either towering
cumulus or mature thunderhead clouds were in
the vicinity whenever the fire made a big run —
a rather good indication of unstable air and
downdraft conditions. The highest burning in-
dexes (66 and 58) fell on the 2 days during
which the greatest spread occurred — July 5 and
13)
Several features of topography apparently
affected the erratic behavior of this: fire. The
wind directions recorded at the fire differ from
those recorded at Fairbanks. Winds coming
across the broad Tanana valley on both the west-
ern and southern sides of the fire area were
broken by the mountains in which the fire
burned. The northeast-southwest flowing Gold-
stream Creek and its steep tributaries further
complicated the consistency of airflow. The
whole topographic complex made it nearly im-
possible to predict the path of the fire.
The fire was declared controlled on July 21.
70
KENAI LAKE FIRE
Extremely steep and long, narrow canyons
converging at the head of the lake cause strong
winds that exhibit daily reversals in direction;
3,278 acres was burned on this fire, primarily as
a result of these winds. Local night drafts could
have been quite gusty and strong and from al-
most any direction during the time of the fire's
rapid advance. The burning index, recorded at
the lower end of Kenai Lake, climbed to 57 on
the day of origin; this is critical for coastal
Alaska.
Clearing fires from homestead preparation
and right-of-way construction have caused hun-
dreds of acres of forest land to go up in smoke
over the past 5 decades. A right-of-way clear-
ing fire in National Forest land along Kenai Lake
was very small when discovered and first at-
tacked on June 10, 1959. The point of origin
was in a stand of white spruce where consider-
able moss was present; both the rate of spread
and resistance to control were rated as high. By
evening of June 13, the fire covered about 2,000
acres, extending along Kenai Lake for 7 miles
and up a 75-percent slope for a mile or more.
The major part of the fire burned in good quality
black spruce timber. The fire had pretty well run
out of fuel on the upper reaches of this steep
mountainside, but it was burning at both the
left and right ends. The condition of the fire
at this time can best be described by quoting
from the fire-behavior team's report:
... the fire was burning at about
120 chains per The fire was
crowning in mostly black spruce timber
with a northeast wind blowing at 10
miles per hour behind it. There were
small spruce needles falling all over
hour.
the ground as far as 2 miles ahead of
the fire...
At 0800 on June 14, the 39 percent relative
humidity and the 9 percent fuel moisture indi-
cated afternoon burning conditions would be
unusually bad. However, the fire made no par-
Fair weather cumulus clouds
were overhead from before 1600 until after
1800. At 1730 the wind shifted from a prevail-
ing northeast direction to southwest, with a
considerable increase in velocity. Line was lost
at both ends of the fire and along the lakeshore
ticular big gains.
COMPILED FROM
TOPOGRAPHIC SER!
LEGEND
=== PRIMARY HIGHWAY
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
OLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
ALE 1.250.000. AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
GUARD STATION
FIRES ON WHICH SPECIAL
STUDIES WERE MADE
} we a
Oy :
Dae SPAETH re
su
Figure 60
Barrow.) >
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ALASKA
MAP E
COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE?
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1: 250.000, AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
1954
180 MILES
pale DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
_ LEGEND
® CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION.
% OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
# DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
2% GUARD STATION
eos == PRIMARY HIGHWAY
¥ ge! oe Me oud AY Ase ae. ‘ MW) FIRES ON WHICH SPECIAL
Ar We i ne ON ee.
STUDIES WERE MADE
Nt # dh he
* vs
BRGY 4 iy MUD
gee, ’
RE
bs 4 tay
Ra
o yerson \
y 5 BUFFALO CENTER #)
Ra aS Hy, SLRS
sn WL MAE
en Wide, “F TANACROSS
he yy VSN TAN
3 i,
Para Dy SAE =
Bk iis
BE WesWe
ANCHORAGE /”
“YP SKILAK LAKE
EIS Mapes eea
LA2>, tf, : fs %
{
* ee 3
A N ee
@# HOMER
See
RES tb
AGG
= SSR = s
© NAKNEK WY
Figure 60
ea g -eameaige yi
ay,
nana A i. i
featge: Gerrneee | Lp e we OR
athe
S| isi ae ee
4 es rete D»
i (\
|
. i | A Roeity
if , LLeep
| Ss a | i.) 6S hea »
| \{
a RSA
2 P = A rr LO
O/
f/f [i ©
SCALE 1: 250,000
0
Figure 61. — Healy fire vicinity.
71
SCALE 1:250000
O 5 MILES
mest Meer
Figure 63. — Kenai Lake fire 1 year after it burned.
road, and many summer homes in the Snug
Harbor vicinity were endangered. The fire be-
came extremely active for a short while but
slowed down as soon as the wind slackened.
The wind shift on the fire may have been caused
by a major shift in pressure patterns aloft; evi-
dence for this might be the disappearance of
small cumulus clouds from the area. A special
fire-weather forecast could possibly have warned
the fireboss that such a situation might occur.
This was the last significant advance of the
fire; it was declared under control 2 days later.
COLORADO CREEK FIRE
Brisk winds, highly flammable fuels, steep
topography, and unprecedented critica! fire
weather all contributed to the difficulties of pre-
dicting fire behavior and of taking adequate
control measures on this 6,000-acre fire.
This fire is thought to have been set by an
incendiarist on June 17, 1959. By early morning
on June 18, 100 acres of muskeg had burned and
burning was intense on each of the 3 days fol-
lowing ignition. Such critical fire-weather factors
as those listed below were never before re-
corded in Interior Alaska:
USFS
Fuel Moisture Relative
Date Stick Slat Temperature humidity
Percent Degrees F. Percent
June 18 Tf, 2.4 86 24
19 6.9 YA 19
20 Fal 1.6 83 21
On June 18, a brisk gusty wind began by
0700 and persisted throughout the day. Before
1300, surface winds carried the smoke away
near the surface; but after that time the column
rose rapidly to extreme heights. Fair weather
cumulus were present from 1300 on. By 1400
the fire was racing through muskeg at the rate
of 60-chains-per-hour forward travel. Fast
spread continued for about 2 hours.
On the morning of June 19 the sky was
clear and wind speeded up to a maximum of 8
miles per hour. The fire jumped the control line
and headed out at a rate of approximately 400
chains per hour. Black spruce became part of
the fuel at the fire's head. The smoke column
rose for several hundred feet, then flowed with
the upper wind; however, as the day went on,
the fire slowed down and the smoke column
tended to toadstool; at this time the cirrus and
SCALE 1:250 000
Figure 64. — Kenai Lake fire vicinity.
74
5 MILES
SCALE 1:250 000
75
igure 65. — Colorado Creek fire vicinity
fair weather cumulus clouds did not appear to
have much movement.
June 20 was another bad day. Altocumulus
castellatus clouds (often a forerunner of thunder-
storms and unstable air) were noticed from mid-
night until about 0900, but no cumulus develop-
ment beyond fair weather stage followed. At
0800 altocumulus lenticularis appeared and the
wind increased. At 1100 the fire jumped a wide
control line and raced up a 90-percent slope
through a black spruce stand at a rate of 140
chains per hour. After it burned out the large
patch of black spruce it crept slowly in the sur-
rounding birch stand. This midday action was
the last period of rapid spread; the fire was de-
clared under control by midafternoon June 23.
The entire 3-day period of record was char-
acterized by temperatures about 10° F. above
normal. Wind direction was predominantly from
northeast on June 18, east on June 19, south-
east on June 20, and east again on June 21.
Average cloud cover was 0.7. Gusty winds
caused some of the rapid advances by whipping
backfires across the control lines. Presence of
lenticular clouds on June 20 indicated high
winds aloft. These, coupled with the combina-
tion of the local general wind direction of south-
east and the normal ofternoon tendency of wind
to flow up-canyon in the side draws, may have
helped the fire take advantage of local highly
flammable fuel concentrations and race through
these at unexpected times.
LAKE 606 FIRE
Thunderstorm downdrafts were the appar-
ent causes for short separate periods of vicious
behavior of this fire, which burned over 1,400
acres.
The Lake 606 fire was thought to have been _
started by lightning on June 19, 1959. It was
discovered the afternoon of June 20 by patrol
plane and was estimated to cover 30 acres.
Initial attack forces arrived in the early morning
of June 21 and soon found two fires totaling
100 acres; these burned together at 1400.
Thunderheads persisted in the vicinity dur-
ing that afternoon. Fuel moisture of the sticks
and slats was 10 and 7 percent, respectively;
maximum temperature was 76, and the lowest
relative humidity was 44 percent. Wind was
76
from the north or northeast except at 1600 and
1700, when it came from the southwest with
increased gustiness and velocity, up to 25 miles
per hour.
The fire-behavior team mentioned it was
difficult at this time to tell which end of the fire
was the head and which was the rear. To quote
their 1600 report:
About 1530 lots of unusual things
started happening. The wind was very
variable. It could sometimes change di-
rection completely and sometimes it
was at a standstill. There were some
whirlwinds all along the fire line...
The smoke was rising fast and ex-
tremely high, becoming a part of a big
toadstool directly overhead. It was im-
possible to determine atmospheric
conditions from where we were be-
cause of the smoke. We did hear
thunder in the SE.
At 1700 the report continued:
Between 1600 and 1700 we had a
very unusual big blowup on the fire.
The smoke was rising extremely high
and forming a big toadstool directly
over the fire. The fire was completely
out of control, burning at rate of about
4 chains per minute (240 chains per
hour). It only burned about 30 minutes
at this rate. At 1640 it began to rain
and about 1715 the wind began to let
up. At the two places on the fire where
most of the activity was taking place
there was small black spruce and lots
of brush. The fire was sweeping through
the trees and leaving the tundra and
grass to burn later. At 1645 lightning
appeared in the SE.
Rain stopped the fire at 1,400 acres.
Atmospheric instability and thunderhead
downdrafts probably contributed heavily to the
extreme behavior of the fire. Black spruce also
appeared to be very conducive to crown fire
behavior.
Fires behaving as this one did can easily
become “‘killers.’’ To prevent such possible tragic
events a better understanding of the ‘‘whys’’
must be learned, supervisory personnel on fires
Figure 66. — Lake 606 fire vicinity.
C6
must be trained to anticipate such behavior, and
more reliable methods for prediction must be
developed.
STONY RIVER FIRE
Unobstructed horizontal continuity of fuels
had much to do with the rapid advance of this
fire. Unexpected shift of wind direction and ve-
locity could have resulted from mature cumulus
clouds, but few were noted; possible passage of
a frontal movement could also have contributed
to the large final area of 8,000 acres.
The lightning fire started on June 22, 1959,
and by the next afternoon it had spread to an
estimated 5,000 acres.
The country was flat to rolling; surface
weather conditions gave no outward indication
of bad fire weather. The wind varied from 5 to
12 miles per hour and was gusty; but even so,
the smoke column rose rapidly and formed a
towering cumulus cloud. A change in the gen-
eral atmospheric situation may have influenced a
shift of wind at 1330 from northerly to southerly;
the wind aloft caused crowning and a spread
rate of 18 chains per hour. Towering cumulus
clouds that were observed at 1315 could also
have caused the wind shift and resultant fast
spread. From 1550 until nearly midnight the
surface wind blew from the west, but the clouds
came from the southwest. In 9 hours’ time the
wind swung around clockwise about 270°. The
greatest spread rate was 33 chains per hour at
about 1700.
No extreme behavior occurred on June 24.
The fire spread both to the north and the
south on June 25. Mature thunderheads devel-
oped by 0800 and persisted until noon, when
only fair weather cumulus were reported. A
trace of precipitation fell during each 2-hour
period from 0800 through 1400; this indicated
that thunderheads may have been present later
into the day than the record showed. Winds
were steady to gusty from 4 to 10 miles per hour
from the northwest pushing the fire to the south,
but at 1600 the wind shifted to a southwesterly
direction and caused trouble on the north end of
the fire. The smoke column first rose lazily and
spread out gradually, but after 0900 the surface
wind carried the smoke away before it rose.
Locally unstable atmospheric conditions may
78
have accounted for most of the high rates of
spread; fuel moisture, relative humidity, and
burning index were mild all day. After June 25,
the fire spread very little.
Coupled with a variety of weather condi-
tions, the fuels — primarily black spruce — were
capable of carrying the flame front with ease.
The relatively flat rolling country with few ob-
structions also permitted the fire to travel un-
hindered.
From the limited information collected, it is
hard to know whether the wind shifts were of
local or general nature; however, upper air
soundings at Bethel, 175 miles southwest of the
fire, indicated a general southwesterly flow of
air that was convectively stable at 1400 on June
24, in neutral equilibrium at 0200 on June 25;
but at 1400 on June 25, layers of air were be-
coming convectively unstable.
The final area was 8,000 acres, about 5,000
acres of which burned on June 23.
HUGGINS ISLAND W-10 FIRE
Three major runs were observed on this fire.
Steep slopes and heavy black spruce fuels were
associated with all three. Brisk winds acceler-
ated one of the runs, and thunderstorm cells in-
fluenced another. The fire was lightning caused
on June 19, 1959, attacked on June 24 when it
was already 4,500 acres, and abandoned on
July 1. It finally burned out at an estimated
size of 50,000 acres.
During June 25, both towering cumulus
and altocumulus lenticularis clouds were present;
some precipitation fell at 1630.
At about 2000 the fire, which had been
crawling through tundra, reached a black spruce
stand on a 7/5-percent slope and raced through it
at about 90 chains per hour; the average spread
for a whole hour was 45 chains. There was no
special note of increased or erratic wind; no cu-
mulus clouds were present; but the smoke column
changed from rising lazily and spreading out,
This
change in the smoke column characteristic may
to being carried away by surface winds.
have been an important clue to the sudden rapid
spread of the fire, but the changes in slope and
fuel type were also pertinent to the cause. There
might also have been a topographic influence on
local wind flow at that time of day.
| SCALE 1:250000
Figure 67. — Stony River fire vicinity.
79
fe
A
=
: :
oO 3
wo
N 5
Coen a 53
Lu C
=)
<
©O
7)
On the morning of June 26, after a change
from steady, light northeasterly wind to a vari-
able wind, and under moderate fire-weather and
clear-sky conditions, the fire began crowning at
80 chains per hour up a 75-percent slope con-
taining black spruce. At 1000 all the weather
conditions worsened, many dust devils occurred,
cumulus clouds began to form, the smoke column
rose rapidly and high, but the fire slowed to 20
chains per hour on a 35-percent slope, still in
black spruce. The wind was now from the north
and continued there all day. The fire continued
to advance but not with extreme behavior char-
acteristics.
At 1600, however, to quote the fire-be-
havior report, ‘A whole north-south wall of flame
is moving west over a ridge at a fantastic rate
— possibly a good 5 miles per hour. No warn-
ing — the whole ' mile of flame started within
3 minutes.'’ The smoke column continued to rise
for some distance, then toadstooled. There had
been no noticeable weather, fuel, or topographic
change (21- to 50-percent slope) to cause this
erratic behavior; nowever, the 1800 observation
mentions fully mature thunderheads with virga
in the vicinity. Maximum wind velocity at the
weather station, though, was only 11 miles per
hour. At 1930 the wind shifted from north to
southeast, the fire subsided and remained quiet
during the night. The fire was now about 13,000
acres in size.
Since the available firefighting crew was
so small and the extended period of fire weather
was so adverse, the fire was finally abandoned
in late evening on July 1. More complete
weather observations and intensive study of the
atmospheric conditions might have led to a
better explanation of the fire's rapid spread.
SUMMARY
Topography to windward of the Healy fire
forms a saddle through which wind velocities
are usually greatly increased. This fact is the
major reason for the fast spread and difficult
control of the fire.
The broken topographic complex on the lee
side of a broad flat valley, high burning index,
thunderstorms, and instability all contributed to
the irregular and difficult time for predicting be-
havior of tne Murphy Dome fire. One day the
81
fire spread for several hours at a rate of 40
chains per hour.
Topography surrounding the Kenai Lake fire
vicinity is extremely rugged and consists, in part,
of steep canyons converging on the upper end
of the lake. The resultant strong diurnal winds
reverse their direction in morning and evening;
altered atmospheric conditions also violently af-
fect the wind pattern. The diurnal effect caused
serious trouble on one day, and a front moving
through caused considerable loss of line on an-
other day.
The worst fire weather of all the fires re-
ported here occurred on the Colorado Creek fire.
The brisk winds that were altered by steep to-
pography, highly flammable fuels, and generally
critical fire weather all contributed to the dif-
ficulty of predicting fire behavior and taking ap-
propriate control measures. A spread of 140
chains per hour in black spruce was recorded
for a brief period.
The initial run of the Lake 606 fire was
caused by strong winds. The greatest spread,
however, was apparently caused by thunder-
storm downdrafts and unstable atmospheric con-
ditions.
Constant rapid spread of the Stony River fire
was aided by unbroken horizontal fuel continuity
and relatively unstable air associated with a
frontal activity which changed the wind direction
a total of 270 degrees. The fire traveled at a
rate of 33 chains per hour at times.
Thunderstorm downdrafts may have caused
a %y-mile section of the Huggins Island W-10
fire to advance briefly at a rate of 320 to 400
chains per hour. A local wind-topography-black
spruce fuel situation may have caused another
rapid advance of 45 to 90 chains per hour. A
wind switch accompanied by local instability
accounted for still another advance rate of 80
chains per hour. Rough topography, variable and
gusty surface winds, evidence of high winds
aloft, and local atmospheric instability all con-
tributed to periods of extreme fire behavior.
From these case histories very few specific
conclusions can be drawn. However, for the
first time some systematic measure was made of
the weather, topography, and fuel conditions
during actual free-burning periods of wild fires
in Interior Alaska. The results point up these
things: (1) Most wildfire activity can be measured
and explained; (2) more sophisticated methods
will in the future add quantitative information
82
to the predominantly qualitative data recorded
in this study; and (3) the groundwork has been
laid for answering the four questions at the be-
ginning of this chapter.
CHAPTER 8
FIRE CONTROL
Timber losses have approximately balanced
timber growth in unexploited Interior Alaska.
Future demand to harvest part of the crop each
year will require an increase in net growth to re-
place this removal. Besides, the national econ-
omy will demand a continuing increase in the
future allowable cut.
How much should be spent to protect this
important resource? Where is the breaking point
between the ratio of loss and damage versus the
cost of protection? No economic study has been
made to ascertain just how much Alaska is
worth in terms of what should be spent to pro-
tect it. Helmers (1960, p. 470) states, “Fires are
so much a part of the summer scene that there
is also the psychological problem of getting pub-
lic recognition of the economical losses due to
fire.’ A close review of the history of our re-
source protection effort and a good look at
long-range needs show the necessity to materi-
ally reduce forest fire damage in Alaska.
Until July 1939, organized forest fire con-
trol in Alaska was nonexistent. Then the terri-
tory received $37,500 to establish the Alaska
Fire Control Service. Early efforts were confined
to suppression of man-caused fires within sur-
face striking distance of Anchorage and Fair-
banks.
Throughout development of an _ effective
firefighting force, several major problems have
persisted. The vast area and the contrastingly
small, concentrated population have made early
detection difficult; the lack of access to remote
forest and range lands compounds the logistics
of reaching fires and supplying crews. As tourist
numbers increase, so does
caused fires.
incidence of man-
An increasing awareness of the
values at stake and of the need for better pro-
tection has mandated the fire control organiza-
tion to use every means available to reduce the
losses (Robinson 1960).
Since inception of the Alaska Fire Control
Service, great strides have been made toward
control of the major portion of forest fires in
Alaska. Begun under the old General Land Of-
fice, the fire control organization is now oper-
ated as an integral part of the Bureau of Land
83
Management, which has responsibilities for pro-
tection and management for more than 95 per-
cent of the State's area. Protection of much of
this land will remain the responsibility of the
Bureau of Land Management for years to come
even though the State will, within 25 years, as-
sume title to more than 100 million acres.
In 1955 the Bureau of Land Management
developed a comprehensive forestry program for
Interior Alaska. The four major management
objectives are: (1) multiple use management of
the entire forest resource complex rather than
timber management alone, (2) water resource
protection and development, (3) increased utili-
zation and development of the present timber
resource, and (4) protection of the public's vested
interest in the forest and range resources in
Alaska from destruction or damage from fire,
insects, None of the first three
management objectives can be met with confi-
dence until the fire protection organization can
assure, within reasonable limits, a continuing
forest cover. Robinson (1960) proposed a goal
of not more than 100,000 acres of burned area
per year. Basic barriers to early detection, at-
tack, and control of fires must be identified and
overcome.
FIRE CONTROL ORGANIZATION
PRESUPPRESSION
Regardless of the severity of any one fire
season, a well-developed fire control organiza-
tion containing basic personnel and equipment
must be ready to handle an average bad season.
Perhaps the job confronting fire control personnel
for Interior Alaska can best be described by
comparing it with another fire control group,
Region 1 of the U.S. Forest Service:
and disease.
Interior Alaska
Region 1] Interior Alaska compared to
uses | BLM Region |
Acres protected 32,000,000 225,000,000 7 times
Acres. burned 4,467 1,119,130 250 times
Number of fires 1,069 254 25 percent
Number of fires per 33 11 3 percent
million acres
Fire personnel, man-years? 348 38 11 percent
Number people per 4.9 4 8 percent
square mile
}Montana, northern Idaho, northwest South Dakota, and
northeast Washington.
2Regularly assigned positions including fire control aids.
Bases and Warehousing
Major operational bases and warehousing
facilities are at Anchorage and Fairbanks, the
only two cities capable of furnishing manpower,
food, equipment, supplies, and services neces-
sary for launching and supporting fire crews in
the field. These are augmented by a few sec-
ondary permanently manned bases located at
strategic support centers. In addition, several
fireguard stations, manned seasonally, are situ-
ated from Skilak Lake on the Kenai Peninsula
northward to Fort Yukon just north of the Arctic
Circle.
The long time required to deliver many
supplies (retardant chemicals for instance) makes
it imperative to anticipate such needs as long as
one season ahead of expected use.
Most equipment, tools, and supplies are
packaged and stored in six-man units — a
Grumman Goose load of firefighters. Develop-
ment of new tools and equipment for fighting
fires in the Alaskan fuel complex has lagged
seriously. Dozers, tankers, and pumpers are used
where available and where topography and soil
along the fireline permit. Shovels and pulaskis
are the old standbys for handtool work. New
hand and power tools are urgently needed to
help offset the relative scarcity of personnel, the
difficulty of terrain, and the remoteness that
gives fires such a headstart.
Dispatching
Most dispatching of men, equipment, and
materials is handled at Anchorage and Fair-
banks. Nearly all smokejumping and a major
part of retardant chemical attack operations are
controlled from Fairbanks. Dispatching involves
considerable advance planning, preparation, and
training. Even pilots of the contract retardant
planes require orientation and training by the
dispatcher staff. All aircraft use is controlled by
the dispatcher and chief pilot in order to attain
greatest value from each plane.
Effective dispatching depends upon a highly
reliable communications system. Trunkline tele-
phone service is excellent, but is limited to the
large cities and to a few places of habitation
along the main highways. All other communica-
tions are by radio. Airplanes need the most
complex set of equipment as pilots depend on
84
radio for navigation and safety as well as for
tight control on fire missions. All stations and
a large share of vehicles are radio-equipped:
VHF-FM for air-ground work; VHF-FM and HF-
AM for vehicle and station use.
Deployment of men and equipment during
the fire season must be based upon information
about fire occurrence. Since a large percentage
of man-caused fires occurs in May and early
June, men, tankers, dozers, and other ground
equipment are aimed at control of fires near
habitation centers and areas of agricultural de-
velopment. Later, all the aircraft — whether for
patrol, smokejumping, chemical attack, or sup-
ply — must be in constant readiness to attack
lightning fires anywhere in the State.
Manpower
The supply of manpower in Alaska is small,
and the distribution in respect to recruiting fire-
fighters is poor. Even though Alaska’s popula-
tion has increased fourfold in the past 40 years,
the 1960 census records a total of only 226,167
persons (four-fifths the population of Nevada).
The tabulation below shows the uneven distribu-
tion of people; only about 100,000 persons re-
side outside of the Anchorage and Fairbanks
vicinities, and many of these are in the southeast
coastal area.
Climatic Geographic Approximate
division division population
Maritime zone Southeast, South Coast, 56,000
Aleutians
Transition zone Copper River, Cook Inlet, 106,000
Bristol Bay, West Central
(includes Anchorage)
Continental Interior Basin 49,000
(includes Fairbanks)
Arctic zone Arctic Drainage 15,000
A small part of the regular fire control per-
sonnel are year-round employees, but most of
the fire dispatching and overhead employees are
seasonal. Most of them enter duty in April or
May and remain until September. They are the
well-trained nucleus that leads the attack on
fires throughout the summer.
The actual firefighters come from two
sources — Indian villages and the open labor
market. The natives and Eskimos are excellent
firefighters. Their villages are sufficiently scat-
BLM B BLM
ic USFS
Figure 69. — Base facilities: A, fire headquarters, Fairbanks; B, smokejumper center, Fairbanks; C, dispatch room, Fairbanks; D,
McGrath station; E, Skilak Lake guard station.
85
tered so that groups are often close to fires and
can be recruited rapidly for early attack. They
learn quickly and fit well into fireline organiza-
tion. Also, they are physically able to stand
backbreaking work for many days at a time.
The pickup firefighters from the open labor
market are of similar caliber to those found
anywhere else; however, a few of them do re-
turn season after season and become topnotch
workers.
Successful in western United States since
World War Il days, smokejumping began in In-
terior Alaska in 1959 with 16 jumpers. Setting
up a smokejumper center in Fairbanks was a
major undertaking. Everything from a loft-dor-
mitory building to sewing machines, from ac-
quiring a DC-3 to modifying the doors of a Grum-
man Goose had to be done to make the jumper
force effective. Retraining dispatchers in new
procedures and transportation methods was also
necessary. Well-executed presuppression work
in this new phase of fire control paid off when
the actual suppression load began to increase.
Transportation
Of Alaska's 5,000 miles of highway, 3,000
are blacktopped, 2,000 are graveled.
access roads go into homesteads, mining prop-
erty, and recreational sites, but the actual mile-
age of these roads is very small. However, since
most man-caused fires are along the highways
or on homesteads (fig. 57), a far greater number
of trucks, pickups, and tankers is used than one
would suspect by looking at road data alone.
Private
Aircraft are the hard core of the firefighting
attack force. As one official put it, ‘The possibil-
ity for successful fire control started the day we
These
short-field amphibious planes can land on small
lakes or sloughs close to fires; hence they are
constantly used for patrolling, servicing and sup-
plying, making initial and reinforcing attacks,
and for smokejumping. Single engine, 4-place
planes are kept busy on patrol, scouting, in-
spection, and administrative use. A Douglas C-47
(DC-3) is used primarily for smokejumpers; but it
can also move equipment, supplies, and non-
jumping firefighters. A P-51 fighter plane carries
the observer for long-range detection and scout-
ing; it is also used as lead plane for chemical
retardant attack.
received our three Grumman Gooses."'
86
Charter and contract planes carry all the
overload while the fire season is in full swing.
At the peak of the season, one sees the usual
assortment of larger chemical retardant applica-
tion planes, several makes of helicopters, and
both wheel and float type planes of the single
engine, 4-place category. The numerous Alaskan
commercial airlines furnish much of the heavier
point-to-point hauling.
When fire conditions become critical and
commercial equipment is no longer available,
the military forces contribute many hours of fly-
ing. Heavy point-to-point hauling is done by
planes in the C-123 class; helicopters —- even
the large double-rotor type — often do yeoman
duty during crucial times.
DETECTION?
The critical need for early detection of fires
has been emphasized several times. A small
crew can usually (not always by any means)
handle a fire if they can attack before it begins
to take over its own destiny. Prior to about
1957, aerial detection was limited for a practical
reason: The attack force was not large enough
to act on more than a small percentage of the
fires; so there was no point in detecting all the
fires that did start. The advent of retardants and
smokejumpers now makes early detection of all
fires imperative if these two new weapons are
to be of maximum value.
All the means of detection credited above
are somewhat haphazard, and at best are a
poor substitute for a continuous, trained detec-
tion organization. The Bureau of Land Manage-
ment has, since 1959, chartered a P-51, Mustang
fighter plane to follow in the wake of thunder-
storms in order to locate possible resultant fires.
This procedure has helped early detection of
many fires, but it has certain serious drawbacks:
One plane cannot adequately patrol 150 million
(the area of Montana and Idaho com-
bined); an observer cannot locate all small fires
acres
from a fast-moving, high-flying plane; accurate
9Statistical analysis of time elapsed between origin of fires
and their discovery proved unsuccessful because too many data
were lacking on the fire reports. Only about one-third of the
large (Class E) fires could be used; this fact presumably in-
fluenced the results to show that longer lags in discovery
time did not result in larger fires. The question will have to
remain a matter of conjecture until factual data are collected
on the behavior of free-burning fires: from the time of origin.
Cc USFS
Figure 70. — Transportation: A, foot travel is slow, often impossible; B, loading a Goose for fire run; C, air supply — Goose to
small float plane.
87
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ATe ALASKA
| ete ce MAP E
COMPILED FR VEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC E1:2 AND OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCES
we tes
oie tah) : DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
LEGEND
vA CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
Nowe OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
(fee DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
oe eg GUARD STATION
ee === PRIMARY HIGHWAY
ae AREA OBSERVED BY
: COMMERCIAL AIRLINES
GREEN 1 -/0 FLIGHTS PER WEEK
Mg eo BROWN 11-20 FLIGHTS PER WEEK
RED MORE THAN 20 FLIGHTS PER WEEK
SOURCE: /959 AIRLINE SCHEDULES
AB ye STS
STOR SP DP AATI Tem coe ae
Figure 71
uy
“w
1
ay
on
KILAK LAKE 2
ai
Fo
ae
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
= ALASKA
See MAP E
aN COMPILED FROM THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALASKA RECONNAISSANCE
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES, SCALE 1: 250 000, AND OTKER OFFICIAL SOURCES.
— 1954
\ On Serine eraser”
\ ano \ ‘ DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
ee _ LEGEND
wl \ se ® CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA STATION
w® OPERATIONS AREA HEADQUARTERS
# DISTRICT FIRE CONTROL OFFICE
e. $ &® GUARD STATION
een =— PRIMARY HIGHWAY
eS AREA OBSERVED BY
\ - COMMERCIAL AIRLINES
GREEN 4-10 FLIGHTS PER WEEK
ak BROWN 11-20 FLIGHTS PER WEEK
RED MORE THAN 20 FLIGHTS PER WEEK
SOURCE
1959 AIRLINE SCHEDULES
pry?
6-93
~ et Le se nluureyh at Mt BE Het Per RL,
1f
z ts :
a 2 5 SS ES — —— —
REET ee er ee ee teenies OO DLL AAA ALAA LL SS
Figure 72. — Early detection of this small lightning fire will
contribute to rapid control.
description and location of current thunderstorm
cells or systems is not yet feasible; and, because
of its speed such a plane is often diverted from
its primary detection mission to be used for re-
connaissance of going fires and for lead plane
duties on retardant chemical attacks. The lighter
planes which are also used occasionally for pa-
trol are dispatched to lead plane duty whenever
possible to permit the P-51 to continue its recon-
naissance work.
Recent advances in development of elec-
tronic devices may make it possible to provide
a reliable system for tracking storms, locating
fires, and mapping going fires. Certain types
of radar can identify mature thunderstorm cells.
Sferics receivers are being developed to further
determine whether an electrical disturbance is
present (Battan 1959). Airborne infrared map-
ping devices are now being investigated for use
in the actual locating and mapping of fires
(Hirsch 1962).
SUPPRESSION
Preparation for an expected bad fire season
in Interior Alaska is a tremendous job, but it
must be done thoroughly so that the subsequent
suppression effort will be adequate.
Method of Attack
Fire control tactics in Interior Alaska are
similar to those used elsewhere. Logistically, at-
89
tack on fires accessible to motor vehicles is rela-
tively simple. Initial attack on fires hundreds of
miles from the source of supply requires ingenuity
and wise use of every facility feasible. Except
for longer time and distances involved, the fol-
lowing procedure follows closely those used in
other States: As soon as a fire is reported, the
dispatcher sends chemical retardant planes. At
the same time he dispatches smokejumpers.
Then, ground forces are sent to reinforce and re-
lieve jumpers. Their travel may be by land plane
to a small field, thence by amphibious plane to
a body of water near the fire, and possibly by
helicopter to the fireline. Subsequent loads of
chemicals for tactical support are often ordered
when conditions indicate the need.
As an example of the effectiveness of this
type of rapid attack, some 1959 statistics follow:
Of all fires upon which retardant was dropped,
35 percent was within 50 miles of the base, 43
percent between 50 and 100 miles, and 22 per-
cent between 100 and 200 miles; an average of
seven loads was dropped on each fire by planes
traveling a mean one-way distance of 85 miles.
The application of chemical checked the fires’
spread to an extent that firefighters controlled 85
percent of them at the same size class as when
the retardant was applied.
Smokejumpers in 1959 traveled as far as
472 miles to reach fires, but the average distance
was 250 miles. Jumpers controlled 36 fires with
an average force of five men per fire, and con-
trolled 94 percent of them within the same size
class as when attacked.
Distance Traveled to Fires
Analysis of individual fire reports showed
only the following general relationships between
distance traveled according to final fire size, and
whether action was taken: Fifty-six percent of all
reported fires occurred within 100 miles of head-
quarters. Sixty percent of action fires occurred
within 100 miles compared to only 20 percent of
those on which no action was taken. Only 12
percent of action fires occurred at distances
greater than 200 miles compared with 39 per-
cent for no-action fires. One-third of the fires
larger than 300 acres are farther than 200 miles
away from headquarters. More than two-thirds
are farther than 100 miles away. This situation
will always prevail simply because it takes
Table 16.—Percent of fires controlled within each class of time lapse from
initial attack by final size class
(Av. 1950-58)
Final
size Time lapse (hours)
class 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-6 6-12 12-24 24-48 48-72 72+
Percent
A 73 12 5 8 1 0
B 31 WA 13 16 8 8 4 1 2
(é 1] 8 9 23 19 12 8 3 7
D 3 5 13 10 22 16 13 5 13
E 1 1 2 5 11 11 16 12 4l
Av. 30 11 9 14 10 8 6 3 9
TLess than 1.0 percent.
longer to go greater distances. But when greater Time From Attack to Control
distance from headquarters is coupled with Table 16 based on records of 986 fires con-
longer time between fire origin and detection, firms what one would expect to be the relation
between the length of time required to control
a fire and the final size of the fire; namely, the
longer it takes to bring a fire under control, the
pay its way. larger the final acreage will be.
only larger fires yet can be expected. Again re-
duction of detection time would far more than
Figure 73. — Such large fires are difficult and expensive to control.
90
Figure 74. — Aerial fire attack: A, smokejumpers drop on Christian Village fire, 1960; thin diagonal line in upper right is strip of
retardant; B, timely jumper attack may assure early control.
91
Figure 75. — Fighting fires: A, handline construction is still the mainstay; B,
92
military eauipment assists in emergencies.
The number of extra-period fires measures
two things — effectiveness of the fire control
organization, and severity of the fire season. An
extra-period fire is one not controlled by 10 A.M.
of the day following discovery. The BLM fire re-
port data allowed only the following approxi-
mation to be attained: a fire not controlled with-
in 24 hours from initial attack. With this in
mind, the figures comparing Interior Alaska
(1950-58) with Region 1, USFS (1954-60) are re-
markably close.
Ratio of extra-period fires to
Size of fire total number of fires
Interior Region ]
Alaska USFS
Percent
10 acres or less 4 6
More than 10 acres 36 35
However, if the Alaska data were based on
the time between discovery and control, the per-
centage of extra-period fires, for the larger fires
at least, would certainly be much greater in
Alaska.
Forward Behavior of Fires at Time of Attack
The importance of early attack is illustrated
in table 17. Usually fires with large final size
are more violent in behavior at time of attack
than small ones. Outstanding extremes in the
spruce type are indicated by the fact that 70 per-
cent of Class A fires are smoldering when at-
tacked, but 47 percent of Class E fires are crown-
ing when attacked. If fires could be reached
while still small and before they start to run, the
total control effort would be considerably les-
sened, as would also the loss and damage. That
goal can never be completely reached, as some
fires may begin running and crowning almost
immediately after they start; however, this infor-
mation about behavior must be kept in mind as
an important factor in both fire control planning
and dispatching.
Table 17.— Forward behavior of fires in spruce type at time of initial attack
by percent within each behavior class and by size classes
(Av. 1950-58)
Final
size Behavior
class Smoldering Creeping Running Spotting Crowning
Percent
A 70 Si] 12 25 7.
B 19 39 4] 25 17
C 18 22 19 19
D 5 5 12 10
E ve 20 19 47
FIRE AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL
Use of fire in forest management is at times
a controversial issue, but many protection and
silvicultural objectives that could not be attained
economically by any other means are being
achieved through proper use of fire. Helmers
(1960, p. 467) states, primarily in reference to
southeastern Alaska, but possibly for many
parts of Interior Alaska:
93
The possibility that fire can be
used for silvicultural purposes is pure
conjecture at this time. However, there
is a need for reduction in slash volumes
to reduce the physical impediment to
regeneration as well as to reduce the
fire danger in newly regenerated cut-
ting. The seedbeds in cutover areas can
be improved to advantage. These fac-
tors alone make controlled use of fire
a tool worth investigation.
Figure 76. — Use of fire: A, slash hazard, Kenai Peninsula; B, timber resource suffers from poor planning; C, example of current
practice of windrowing slash resulting from land-clearing operations.
94
Lutz (1960) recognizes that fire properly
used can, even in boreal forests, become a valu-
able silvicultural tool. He does not believe that
the present forester or wildlife manager has suf-
ficient knowledge *’ . to enable him to use
prescribed burning on anything more than a
purely experimental basis. There is a great oppor-
tunity and need for research on this problem’
(p. 460). He also proposes investigating the use
of fire to manipulate the position of the perma-
frost table for silvicultural benefit.
Ecological research performed within boreal
forests in Sweden indicates results similar to
those in Interior Alaska. Uggla (1958a), in com-
paring the effects of controlled fires and wildfire,
states that controlled burns on slightly moist
ground is the most efficient method of activating
humus materials for natural seedbed prepara-
tion. He further states, ‘A feeble forest fire, on
not too dry raw humus ground, can be compared
Sp)
with a controlled burning, but on poor, dry soils,
uncontrolled forest fires can have devastating
effects. . . . On such soils the activating effects
of the fire soon disappear. Since also the addi-
tion of litter will be very inconsiderable for a
long time, degeneration of the forest soil often
results’ (p. 5).
Prescribed burning techniques for safe and
effective land clearing in the Fairbanks area
were explored by Johnson (1958, 1959) and
Gettinger and Johnson (1959); they found it
quite feasible to obtain a good clear burn with-
out endangering the surrounding woods, but
only if certain sound practices were pursued.
As yet untapped are means for fully using
fire as an effective tool in furthering forest
management objectives. Research in fire and
silviculture should aid in determining when and
how fire should be used and when it should not
be used.
REFERENCES
Anonymous.
1961. City on top of the world. Pt. 2. In Anchorage ‘Everybody flies." Alaska Sportsman 27 (2):
25-34.
1961. The world almanac and book of facts. 896 pp. New York: New York World Telegram
and Sun.
Arctic Weather Central, 11th Weather Squadron.
1950. *Climate, weather and flying conditions of Alaska and eastern Siberia. Elmendorf AFB
Proj. 12B-1, 52 pp., illus.
Barrows, J. S.
1951. Fire behavior in Northern Rocky Mountain forests. U.S. Forest Serv. North. Rocky Mtn.
Forest and Range Expt. Sta. Station Paper 29, 103 pp., illus.
Battan, Louis J.
1959. Radar meteorology. 161 pp., illus. Chicago 37: Univ. of Chicago press.
Beall, H. W.
1949. An outline of forest fire protection standards. Canada, Dept. North. Affairs and Natl. Re-
sources Forestry Branch, pp. 82-106, illus. (Reprinted from Forestry Chron. 25 (2), 1949.)
Besley, Lowell.
1959. A preliminary national program of forest fire research for Canada. Canad. Pulp and
Paper Assoc. Woodlands Sec. Ann. Meeting Index No. 1902 (F-3), 8 pp.
Buckley, John L.
1957. Wildlife in the economy of Alaska. Alaska Univ. Biol. Paper 1, (Revised), 33 pp., illus.
Bureau of Land Management.
1955. *Forestry Program for Alaska. U.S. Dept. Int., 89 pp., illus.
Dachnowski-Stokes, A. P.
1941. Peat resources in Alaska. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. 769, 84 pp., illus.
Elmendorf Forecast Center Headquarters.
1953. *Local forecasting studies. (For 7 Alaskan and Canadian stations). USWB, USAF, and
USN station forecasting staffs for Elmendorf Forecast Center Headquarters.
Fahnestock, George R.
1951. Correction of burning index for the effects of altitude, aspect, and time of day. U.S. Forest
Serv. North. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Expt. Sta. Res. Note 100, 15 pp.
Gettinger, Henry, and Johnson, P. R.
1959. *The Gettinger burns. U.S. Dept. Agr., ASC office, College, Alaska, 8 pp.
Hardy, Charles E., and Brackebusch, Arthur P.
1959. The Intermountain fire-danger rating system. Soc. Amer. Foresters Proc. 1959: 133-137,
illus.
*Address requests for copies to the originating office.
Ti
Hardy, Charles E., Syverson, Charles E., and Dieterich, John H.
1955. Fire weather and fire danger station handbook. U.S. Forest Serv. Intermountain Forest and
Range Expt. Sta. Misc. Pub. 3, 84 pp., illus.
Hayes, G. Lloyd.
1941. Influence of altitude and aspect on daily variations in factors of forest-fire danger. U.S.
Dept. Agr. Cir. 591,38) pp., illus:
Heintzleman, B. Frank.
1936. Western range. Alaska. U.S. Senate Doc. 199, 74th Congress, pp. 581-598, illus.
1960. Alaska — modern pioneering. Jour. Forestry 58: 435-436.
Helmers, A. E.
1960. Alaska forestry — a research frontier. Jour. Forestry 58: 465-471, illus.
Hirsch, Stanley N.
1962. *Possible application of electronic devices to forest fire detection. U.S. Forest Serv. Inter-
mountain Forest and Range Expt. Sta. Res. Note 91, 8 pp.
Hopkins, David M., Karlstrom, Thor N. V., and others.
1955. Permafrost and ground water in Alaska. Geological Survey Prof. Paper 264-F., pp. 113-146,
illus. Washington: U.S. Govt. Printing Office.
Johnson, P. R.
1958. *The Bouton burn. U.S. Dept. Agr., ASC office, College, Alaska, 3 pp.
1959. *The Bushley burn. U.S. Dept. Agr., ASC office, College, Alaska, 3 pp.
Kincer, J. B.
1941. Supplemental climatic notes for Alaska. Climate and man, p. 1214. 1248 pp., illus. U.S.
Govt. Printing Office.
Lutz, Harold J.
1956. Ecological effects of forest fires in the interior of Alaska. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. 1133,
121 pp:, illus:
1959. Aboriginal man and white man as historical causes of fires in the boreal forest, with partic-
ular reference to Alaska. Yale Univ. School of Forestry Bul. 65. 49 pp.
1960. Fire as an ecological factor in the boreal forest of Alaska. Jour. Forestry 58: 454-460, illus.
, and Caporaso, A. P.
1958. *Indicators of forest land classes in air-photo interpretation of the Alaskan Interior. U. S.
Forest Serv. Alaska Forest Res. Center Sta. Paper 10, 31 pp., illus.
Nelson, Urban C.
1960. The forest-wildlife resources of Alaska. Jour. Forestry 58: 461-464, illus.
98
Palmer, Lawrence J., and Rouse, Charles H.
1945. Study of the Alaska tundra with reference to its reactions to reindeer and other grazing
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. Res. Rpt. 10, 48 pp., illus.
Pomeroy, Kenneth B.
1959. An AFA fire plan for Alaska. Amer. Forests 65 (9) 12-13, 55, illus.
Reed, Richard J.
1956. *Miscellaneous studies of polar vortices. Wash. Univ. Dept. Met. and Climatol. Occas. Rpt.
App. illus.
1958. *Synoptic studies in Arctic meteorology. Wash. Univ. Dept. Met. and Climatol. Occas. Rpt.
9, 64 pp., illus.
1959. *Arctic weather analysis and forecasting. Wash. Univ. Dept. Met. and Climatol. Occas. Rpt.
pat sop., illus:
Rhode, Clarence J., and Barker, Will.
1953. Alaska's fish and wildlife. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. Cir. 17, 60 pp., illus.
Robinson, R. R.
1960. Forest and range fire control in Alaska. Jour. Forestry 58: 448-453, illus.
Rowe, J. S.
1959:
Forest regions of Canada. Canada, Dept. North. Affairs and Natl. Res. Forestry Branch
Bul. 123, 71 pp., illus. Ottawa: The Queens Printer and Controller of Stationery.
Stromdahl, Ingvar.
1956. *Statens brandinspektions verksamhet. The Govt. Insp. Fire Serv. Inform. Recommendations
1956: 13, 68 pp., Stockholm, Sweden. (In Swedish. Eng. summary, p. 68.)
1959. *Rikssbogsbrandstatistiken 1958 och en tillbakablick pa dren 1944-1958. Natl. Insp. Fire
Serv. Inform. Recommendations 1959: 11, 12 pp., Stockholm, Sweden. (In Swedish. Eng.
summary, pp. 11-12.)
Swager, W. L., Fetterman, L. G., and Jenkins, F. M.
1958. A study of the cooperative forest-fire-control problem. Battelle Memorial Institute summary
report to U.S. Forest Serv. 16 pp., illus. Columbus 1, Ohio.
Taylor, Raymond F.
1956. A world geography of forest resources. Ch. 6. Alaska, pp. 115-125, illus. New York: Ronald
Press Co.
Uggla, Evald.
1958a. Ecological effects of fire on north Swedish forest. Uppsala Univ. Inst. Plant ecology, 18 pp.,
illus. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksells Boktryckeri AB.
1958b.
Skogsbrandfalt i Muddus National Park. Uppsala Univ. Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 41, 109
pp., illus. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksells Boktryckeri AB. (In Swedish. Eng. summary,
pp..99- 109.)
99
U.S. Department of the Interior.
1945. Alaska. USDI Division of Territories and Island Possessions, 65 pp., illus.
U.S. Forest Service.
1958. Timber resources for America's future. Separate |. A summary of the timber resources. U.S.
Dept. Agr., Forest Serv. Forest Resource Rpt. 14, 109 pp., illus.
U.S. Weather Bureau, Climate and Crop Weather Division.
1943. Climatic atlas for Alaska. U.S. Weather Inform. Branch Hdars. A.A.F. Rpt. 444, 229 pp.,
illus.
Watson, C. E.
1959. Climates of the states — Alaska. USWB Climatography of the United States 60-49, 24 pp.,
illus.
Zumwalt, Eugene V.
1960. The Alaska public domain. Jour. Forestry 58: 443-447, illus.
100
APPENDIX
Division Tables
Climatological Statistics —.......0000000... 18-33
Pure statistics, 200) .22).. ee Mees ee 34-43
Damage Statistics... 2 shee 44-46
Fire Control Statistics -...............0..00.0..... 47-55
101
Per
Table 18.--Monthly and annual normal precipitation
Aree niu a Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
Interior Basin |
Bettles 0.73 0.39 0.88 0.37 1.05 28 alae 3.09 2.25 1.44 0.69 01.57
Big Delta 58 a6 4 .28 64 2.31 2.99 1.98 1.43 200) 29 Pxets)
Fairbanks 99 Avil uDd8 29 74 Teor. 1.92 2.26 dae 92 63 00
Fort Yukon 08 04 .28 ait, 32 awa 96 L628 OL BO 41 AER}
Galena af alt 81 74 oli 63 1.69 2.69 2.84 2.4 .6 .6 6
Lake Minchumina 2/
McGrath 1.14 ES 98 49 94 2.06 2.52 3.63 2.41 1.67 109: 25
Northway «62 04 22 00 (2 2.00 2.89 ale He akenls} 49 06 Ol
Summit aRs(eay 1.33 1.32 54 .98 QO 3.38 3.37 3.35 1.89 1.43 ast)
Tanana 81 59 .58 26 ne) L.268 2.39 A509. 2995 05 .63 SO
Arctic Drainage
Kotzebue 47 32 Beat A 06 00 49 ARR ten) 195 94 358 43 OO
West Central
Bethel .90 .82 .92 755 .89 1320 2.29 4.02 S201) Us75 97 .85
Unalakleet 2/
Cook Inlet
Anchorage .76 58 . 60 .40 BOIL .89 255 2.56 lei Ala esti 1.00 84
Homer 2.59 1.40 1.64 1.535 1:00 OY 1.66 2.89 2.79 3.74 2/55 2.76
Bristol Bay
Tliamna 1.20 290) 1.33 TOI, 35 1.54
Naknek 94 1.24 ak sate) 280 228 oe.
-80 5.03 3.99 3.20 1.50 1.88
-l10 4.14 3.49 2.73 1.30 Ted
GW
Copper River
Gulkana ate] 42 SOT nel -Al alee) Ane Oi 2.15 74 -66 a a)
ay Data for Sept.-Dec. not given in climatological summary, but obtained through correspondence.
2/ Not sufficient records to establish a mean precipitation.
Source: U. S. Weather Bureau, Climatological Data, Annual Summary, 1958.
103
Table 19.--Percent of normal annual precipitation for the period March through August
nee Month Total precipitation
March April May June July Aug. March - August Annual
Interior Basin Percent Inches Inches
Bettles 6.3 Za0) Wleo 8.4 9.8 22 zal Siaul 7.94 14.01
Big Delta Pres) 2.4 5.5 19.59 PAT TO, 13.4 8.54 163
Fairbanks 4.9 224 6x2 ANS) Gia! 19.0 60.1 fikG Ib, 82
Ft. Yukon 4.3 256 459 TORS 14.8 OG heal 6.72 6.52
Galena bral 136 - 4.5 qa 6 18.6 TOIE5 60.4 5 1H 14.52
Lake Minchumina No record
McGrath Byeak Pee CUB, HORS ee ale LOO 654.5 10.42 19.13
Northway aL a) Bele —S\c.6) 17.6 PO o(5} 16.0 TOMS Mass) 11.34
Summit 59 2.4 4.5 9.6 1b) 3 aE yee BAS Te Ae 2 22.25
Tanana 4.2 AGS) Sig) Oe 17.4 21.0 59/50 Srl USS TS)
Arctic Drainage
Kotzebue 3.3 AnD 245i. Saal Ke) 52 24.3 Gl 4.93 8.02
West Central
Bethel Dye! 3.0 4.9 Gab 126 PPM 54.2 9.85 ilge}s IL7/
Unalakleet No record
Cook Inlet
Anchorage 4.2 2.8" OiaG 6.2 AOS) fp) 45.6 Gaol! UARAT
Homer 6.5 52.0) 4:0 4.2 6.6 11.4 38.0 9.59 eORee
Bristol Bay
Tliamna De 5.9) sone 6.0 LORY AE) 50-7 25306 25.78
Naknek 52 SOU D6 6.6 Aor 18.0 Eats) ALEXA 05} Pe (
Copper River
Gulkana One PAGu 2.10 HOW 18.01! 16.0 Oifecull 5 dLy/ tal 740)
a NE
Source: United States Weather Bureau, Climatological Data, Annual Summary, 1958.
104
Table 20.--Departure from 9-year average precipitation by number of days per month in
each intensity class
ANCHORAGE.
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
o1- 10- 26- 50- 1.00-
ie} Tr. 09 25 49 99 1.99 2.00+
April
Total 20 9 1 [e) (e)
Dep. from Av. ay 250: -2.7 -.9 ou -.1
May
Total 16 12 3 0 [) [)
Dep. from Av. ee ee -.4 -.6 -.3 -.1
June
Total 12) 5 8 4 [) 1
Dep. from Av. -2.4 -1.9 2.9 ney} -.5 oT
July
Total 8 12 id 3 BE
Dep. from Av. -4.6 5.7 9 -.3 eden -.4 -.2
August
Total 15 10 2 2 es [°)
Dep. from Av. 4.0 3.9 -5.2 -1.5 0 -1.1 -.1
FAIRBANKS
April
Total 26 3 a (e)
Dep. from Av. 4.3 -2.7 -1.4 -.2
Mey
Total 16 § 2! (0)
Dep. from Av. -1.1 -.1 8 9 -.4 -.1
June
Total 15 7 [e) (0) at [)
Dep. from Av. 2rover 2 Lea, -2.3 oa ey -8 -.2
July
Total 13 2 10 3 ee 1 (°)
Dep. from Av. -1.1 -4.2 4.0 4 1.0 ie} -1
August
Total 17 5 5 3 1 0
Dep. from Av. 5.9 -2.5 -3.2 -.4 ot -.4 -.1
GALENA
April
Total 19 6 2. 1 2
Dep. from Av. 1.2 -1.0 -2.5 5 1.8
May
Total 19 10 2 (0) (0) (0)
Dep. from Av. 4.3 2 -2.5 -1.6 -.3 -.1
June
Totel 11 7 8 3 (e) 1
Dep. from Av. -3.7 2.2 alfa -.4 6: mae
July
Total 12 10 5 2 2 (0)
Dep. from Av. -1.0 3.6 -1.3 -1.1 4 -.6
August
Total 10 6 5 5 5 ie}
Dep. from Av. 156% =78 2.1 -1.0 3.8 -1.5
HOMER
April
Total 16 6 4 [e) 3 [e) 1
Dep. from Av. 1.8 -.9 -1.4 -2.3 2.1 -.2 rh
Mey
Total 13 SEE 5 2 ie) 0
Dep. from Av. -1.3 2.3 -1.0 46 -.5 -.2
June
Total 13 5 4 a (0)
Dep. from Av. -2.1 -.4 1 1.8 rH f <1
July
Total 10 9 10 1 z
Dep. from Av. -6.6 5.0 4.4 -2.4 ie) 4
August
Total 18 4 3 4 10) 0
Dep. from Av. 4.0 +3 -3.0 8 -.4 -1.5 -.2
NORTHWAY
April
Total 23 6 at [e) [e)
Dep. from Av. 3.0 -.7 =1.9 -.2 ne
May
Totel ahh 8 9 3 ie} 10)
Dep. from Av. -4.9 9 4.5 6 -.9 -~.2
June
Total 16 uf 4 3 [e)
Dep. from Av. 4.2) =06 -1.8 1 -1.0 -.8
July
Total 1 8 6 5 3 2
Dep. from Av. -4,.8 1.4 -1.0 1.4 tbe / -.3 2.6
August
Total 16 8 6 1 [e) (e)
Dep. from Av. 4,3 ied -1.8 -1.7 -1.4 eta
1950
BIG DELTA
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
O1- 10- 26- 50- 1.00-
ie} “vat 09 25 49 99 1599) 2,.00+
April
Total 25 2 3 [°)
Dep. from Av. 3.8 -3.4 -.2 -.2
May
Total att 1 5 cl 1 (o)
Dep. from Av. -2.8 1.5 1.5 -.4 5 2 -.1
June
Total 20 2 6 1 se 0 fe)
Dep. from Av. 5.3 -3.8 } Paley} -.2 -.6 4
July
Total 14 4 A 2 at 3 [e)
Dep. from Av. -.3 -1.5 4 3 -.8 2.0 -.1
August
Total 16 4 4 4 1 2
Dep. from Av. 2.4 -2.0 -2.0 1.5 -1.1 2
FT. YUKON
April
Total 25 2 3 te) (o)
Dep. from Av. 129 25: BE -.4 -
May
Total 20 6 5 (e) (e)
Dep. from Av. -2.8 8 2.6: -.4 -
June
Total 25 1 4 (e) (0) le)
Dep. from Av. 4.8 -2.6 --7 -1.0 - -.2
July
Total 23 5 3 (o) (o)
Dep. from Av. 2.0 7 EN! yeedienk kaa
August
Total 20 9 1 (e) 1
Dep. from Av. 2.5 3.4 -3.9 -1.6 c Epa
GULKANA
April
Total QT 2 1 (0)
Dep. from Av. 4.6 -2.2 -1.6 -.8
May
Total 17 «14 (°) (°) [e)
Dep. from Av. -2.3 6.6 -3.5 -.5 -
June
Total 16 ue 2 5 [e) (0)
Dep. from Av. -.2 1.8 -3.1 2.2 -.2
July
Total 14 3 8 3 3 (°)
Dep. from Av. 1.5 2 6 3 z -.8 -.1
August
Total 19 v 3 BF 1 [o)
Dep. from Av. 5.6 2,0 -4,8 -1.9 - -.0
McGRATH
April
Totell/ 19 5 2 3 [0 [e)
Dep. from Av. 7 -1.3 -1.9 30) - -.2
May
Total altg Tt 5 2 0 (0)
Dep. from Av. 1.9 -1.7 a4 3 - -.2
June
Total 9 2 6 2
Dep. from Av. -1.0 6 -3,9 2.8 1.4 -.4 nig
July
Total 9 8 4 4 6 [e) (o)
Dep. from Av. =2.0° 1.9 -3.0 2) 3.4 -.6 -.2
August
Total 10 3 9 3 4 2 [e)
Dep. from Av. 2.4 -1.3 3 -2.8 ee 3 -.1
See footnote at end of table.
105
Table 20.--Departure from 9-year average precipitation by number of deys per month in each intensity cless--Continued
1953
EEE EEE
ANCHORAGE:
Precipitation in hundredths of an inoh
o1- 10- 26- 50- 1.00-
i) oy og 25 49 EE 1.99 2.00+
April
Total 1606#ll 2 1 [*) [*)
Dep. from Av. -2.2 4.0 -1.7 od -.1 -.1
Mey
Total 15 bE 2 2 af 0
Dep. from Av. -.8 ae -1.4 1.4 at -.1
June
Total 17 6 3 (e) (e)
Dep. from Av. 2-62. -.9 -1.1 2 -.5 -.3
July
Total 15 8 5 1 2 (o) )
Dep. from Av. CY a bey -1.1 -2.3 -.1 -.4 -.2
August
Total 8 3 7 5 5 3 0
Dep. from Av. -3.0 -3.1 -.2 1.5 3.0 1.9 -.1
FAIRBANKS
April
Total 24 5 1 fe)
Dep. from Av. 220) =e me -.2
May
Total 15 6 3) [e) ak (e)
Dep. from Av. -2.1 -2.1 4.8 -1.1 6 -.1
June
Total 11 a2 3 2 1 [°) 1
Dep. fron Av. -1.5 3.8 2.5 -.3 -.1 -.2 8
July
Total 17 4 4 5 ak (e) (+)
Dep. from Av. 2.9 -2.2 -2.0 2.4 i) -1.0 -.1
August
Totel 8 9 9: 3 1 ) ae
Dep. from Av. -3.1 1.5 8 -.4 one -.4 9
GALENA
April
Total 17 #10 3 {+} fe)
Dep. from Av. -.8 3.0 1.5 -.5 -.2
Mey
Total 12 ll & 3 (e) 1
Dep. from Av. -2.7 1.2 -.5 1.4 -.3 oe)
June
Total 12 8 5 3 i fe) it
Dep. from Av. -2.7 1.3 -.8 LoL -6 -.4 9
July
Total 18 6 5 1 1 0
Dep. from Av. 5.0 -.4 -1.3 -2.1 6 -.6
August
Total 2 abe 8 5 z 4
Dep. from Av. -6.4 4.2 oi) -1.0 -.2 2.5
June
Total 17 8 3 (e) 2 fe)
Dep. from Av pet em Ef) -1.9 -2.2 wil, 1
July
Total 23 5 2 aE (o) ()
Dep. from Av 6.4 1.0 -3.6 -2.4 -1.0 -.4
August
Total 12 3 4 4 3
Dep. from Av. -2.0 -.7 -1.0 -8 1.6 15. -.2
NORTHWAY
April
Totell/ 9 ? 3
Dep. from Av 1.0 3 nL
See footnote at end of table.
106
BIG DELTA
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
O1- 10- 26- 50- 12.00-
o Tr. 09 25 49 EE 2.99 2.00+
April
Totel 22 { 1 (e)
Dep. from Av. -8 2.6 =-2.2 -.2
ee
2
Totel 12 6 9 1 1 [)
Dep. from Av. -7.8 .5 5.5 -6 a) 8 -.2
June
Total 14 3 7 3 2 [s) 1
Dep. from Av. -.7 -2.8 aS) 8 8 -.6 6
July
Total 16 4 7 1 2 zi [e)
Dep. from Av. Wot. 15. 4 -.7 a ie) -.1
August
Total 10 7 9 1 4 [e)
Dep. from Av. -3.6 1.0 3.0 -1.5 19 -.8
FI. YUKON
April
Total 28 1 1 te) )
Dep. from Av. 4.9 -2.5 -1.9 =c4 5 =e! :
May
Total 26 4 1 () [)
Dep. from Av. 3.2 -1.2 -1.4 -.4 -.2 =
June
Total 21 2 4 2 1
Dep. from Av. -8 -1.6 -.7 1.0 BY f -.2
July
Total 20 i 9 L [e)
Dep. from Av -1.0 -3.3 5.3 -.7 -.3
August
Totel 19 5 4 1 2 [*)
Dep. from Av. 1.5 -.6 -.9 -.6 one -.1
GULXANA
April
Total 24 3 2 1
Dep. from Av. 1.6 -1.2 -.6 2c
May
Total 18 9 4 (e) [e)
Dep. from Av. -1.3 1.6 oh) -.5 -.3
June
Total 14 5 8 3 fe)
Dep. from Av -2.2 -.2 2.9 2 5 -.2
July
Total 17 6 2 5 1 () [e)
Dep. from Av. DES se jock -5.4 2.2 meh -.8 -.1
Augus?
Total 8 at ThE 2 2 1
Dep. from Av. -5.4 2.0 3.2 -.9 if 4
McGRATH
April
Total 18 6 5 i ()
Dep. from Av --3 -.3 Leb -.1 -.2 -.2
May
Totel 7 14 4 al 1
Dep. from Av. -8.1 5.3 -.8 2.3 5 8
June
Total i 8 z 1 te)
Dep. from Av. -2.0 1.4 2% -2.2 -.6 6 -.3
Total 16 5 6 1 fe) fe)
Dep. from Av. 4.3 -1.1 -1.0 -2 -1.6 -.6 -.2
August
Totel 4 3 12 5 2 5 fe)
Dep. from Av. -3.6 -1.3 3.3 -.8 -.8 3.3 -.1
Table 20.--Departure from 9-year average recipitation by number of days per month in each intensit. olass~-Continued
ANCHORAGE:
Preoipitation in hundredths of an inoh
ol 10- 26- 50- 1.00-
ie) Tr. 09 25 49 99 1.99 2.00+
April
Total 25 4 aL 1°} ie}
Dep. from Av. 6.8 -3.0 -2.7 =i9) -.1 -.1
May
Total Leo 4 [e) (0) [e)
Dep. from Av. Lee) =. 8: .6 -.6 -.3 =
June
Total 15 9 2 3 1
Dep. from Av. acy Ak -3,1 ne 5
July
Total 12 6 7 3 3 (0) [°)
Dep. from Av. -.6 -.3 at) -.3 9 -.4 -.2
August
Total 12 6 6 4 2 1 [°)
Dep. from Av. 1.0 -.1 -1.2 “5 0 -.1 ph
FAIRBANKS
April
Total 22 8 [¢) (0)
Dep. from Av. 1d “2.95 -2.4 -.2
May
Total 24 4 2 1 [e)
Dep. from Av. 6.9 -4,1 -2.2 -.1 -.4 -1
June
Total 14 8 2 3 3 (e) [e)
Dep. from Av. POM =e. -3.5 Ate anet:) -.2 -.2
July
Total 13 6 4 5 a 1 1
Dep. from Av. -l.1 -.2 -2.0 2.4 0 0 19
August
Total 9 10. 9: 3 [e) [e)
Dep. from Av. -2.1 2.5 8 -.4 -.3 -.4 -.1
GALENA
April
Total 23 4 2 ah [e)
Dep. from Av. §.2 -3.0 2.5 =o: -.2
May
Total al it 3 (0) (o) ()
Dep. from Av. 6.3 -2.8 -1.5 -1.6 -.3 -.1
June
Total 21 2 4 2 al (0) 0
Dep. from Av. 6.3 -4.7 -1.8 el +6 -.4 -.1
July
Total 10 10 3 3 4 1
Dep. from Av. 3.0 3.6 -3.3 -.1 2.4 4
August
Total 8 ¥e 6 9 BE (e)
Dep. from Av. -.4 .2 -1.1 3.0 -.2 =1.5
HOMER .
April
Total 23 6 1 [e) [e) () [e)
Dep. from Av. 8.8 -.9 -4.4 -2.3 -.9 -.2 -.1
May
Total 15 9 5 2 (o) 0
Dep. from Av. orl, ¥O. -1.0 ait =.9 -.2
June
Total 18 10 1 1 (e) ie}
Dep. from Av. 2.9 3.6 -3.9 -1.2 -1.3 --1
July
Total 17 3 5 5 ak
Dep. from Av. +4 -1.0 -.6 1.6 ie} -.4
August
Total 14 3 4 3 3 4
Dep. from Av. 10} -.7 -2.0 -.2 6 2.5 2
NORTHWAY
April
Total 18 9 3 (6) [s)
Dep. from Av. -2.0 2.3 ee -.2 ~.2
May
Total 19 We a to) 3 a
Dep. from Av. 3.1 -.1 -3.5 -2.4 cyt 8
June
Total ye 9, 8 4 1 Z
Dep. from Av. -4.9 1.4 22 plea} 0 AS
July
Total fae eal 10 2 1 o)
Dep. from Av. -4.8 4.4 3.0 -1.6 -.3 -.3 -.4
Total ay g 6 6 (e)
Dep. from Av. 5.3 -1.3 -1.8 ie} Sl!
1954
BIG DELTA
Preoipitation in hundredths of an inch
ol 10- 26- 50- 1.00-
0 Tre 09 25 49 99 1.99 2.00+
April
Total 19 Hf 4 (e)
Dep. from Av. -2.2 1.6 8 -.2
May
Total ay 4 2 3 ak (e) ie)
Dep. from Av. 1.2 -1.5 -1.5 1.6 a] -.2 =a
June
Total 13 8 4 1 2 1 1
Dep. from Av. -1.7 2.2 -1.1 -1.2 A) 4 +6
July
Total 12 5 10 ay 2 eT (o)
Dep. from Av. -2.3 -.5 3.4 -.7 :2 (0) =k
August
Total 16 at 3 3 2 [e)
Dep. from Av. 2.4 1,0 -3.0 5 =a -.8
FT. YUKON
April
Total 27 2 1 i) (o)
Dep. from Av. 3.9 -1.5 mie -.4 -.1
May
Total 28 1 2 [e) [o)
Dep. from Av. 5.2 -4.2 -.4 4 -.2
June
Total Lv, 4 8 1 [e) [e)
Dep. from Av. -3.2 4 3.3 0 -.3 -.2
July
Total 15 6 3 6 1
Dep. from Av. -6.0 1.7 -.7 4.3 eH e
August
Total 17’ 3 9 [°) 2 [e)
Dep. from Av. -.5 -2.6 4.1 -1.6 if Phe
GULKANA
April
Total 30 (0) (0) (e)
Dep. from Av. 7.6 -4.2 -2.6 -.8
May
Total 19 6 5 (e) al
Dep. from Av. -.3 -1.4 1.5 -.5 7
June
Total 18 4 5 a 1 ()
Dep. from Av. 1.8 -1.2 ae -.8 5 2
July
Total 14 2 10 1 4 (0) 0
Dep. from Av. -1.5 -.9 2.6 -1.8 230) -.8 -.1
August
Total 16 3 7 4 tt (°)
Dep. from Av. 2.6 -2.0 -.8 pepal, -.3 -.6
McGRATH
April
Total 20 6 3 a (e) [)
Dep. from Av. a Rey Geri) -.9 -.1 mies -.2
May
Total 26 1 3 7 [o) [°)
Dep. from Av. 10.9 -7.7 -1.8 EPH 6 -.5 -.2
June
Total 2 9 2 5 5 ar (e)
Dep. from Av. 2.0 -.6 -3.9 1.8 4 6 -.3
July
Total 10 8 6 [e) 4 3 (e)
Dep. from Av. -1.7 1.9 -1.0 -2.8 1.4 2.4 -.2
August
Total ay 4 7 3 5 1 [e)
Dep. from Av. 3.4 -.3 Sete -2.8 2.2 -.7 =e
See footnote at end of table.
107
Table 20.--Deperture from 9-year average precipitation by number of deys per month in each intensity cless--Continued
ANCHORAGE
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
o1- 10- 26- 50- 1.00-
ire og 25 49 99 99
2.00+
Mey.
Total 23 id 1 (e)
Dep. from Av. 7.2 -3.8 -2.4 -.6 -.3 cat
June
Total 23 2 2 3 0
Dep. from Av. 8.6 -4.9 -3.1 or 5 3
July
Totel 16 3 5 6 1
Dep. from Av. 3.4 -3.3 -1.1 2.7 -1.1 --4 .2
August
Total 16 2 8 3 a! uf (e)
Dep. from Av. 5.0 -4.1 -8 ==9 -1.0 -.1 Seal
FAIRBANKS
April
Total a1 a 5 (e)
Dep. from Av. --7 -1.7 2.6 -.2
May
Total 19 8 4 (0) 0) 0
Dep. from Av. L.9 --.2 -.2 -1.1 -.4 -.1
June
Total 20 5 5 [o) [e) (e) ie)
Dep. from Av. 7.5 -3.2 5 -2.3 -1.1 2 me
July
Total 14 12 4 1 (e) [e) 0
Dep. from Av. -.1 5.8 -2.0 -1.6 -1.0 -1.0 -.1
August
Total 16 6 8 at, [e) fe)
Dep. from Av. 4.9 -1.5 -.2 -2.4 -.3 4 -.1
GALENA
April
Total 20 5 5 [*) [°)
Dep. from Av. 2.2 -2.0 “B) -.5 -.2
May
Total 20 5 2 3 i
Dep. from Av. 5.3 -4.8 2.5 1.4 7 al
June
Total 25 2 3 (e) i) 0 (e)
Dep. from Av. 10.3 -4.7 -2.8 ag, -.4 -.4 -.1
July
TotalL/ 19 5 4 2 5 ie)
Dep. from Av. 6.0 -1.4 -2.35 -1.1 1.4 6
August
Total 10 af 6 ) ul
Dep. from Av. 1.6 ee el 1.0) -1.2 -.5
HOMER
April
Totel aby 7 2 3 1 0
Dep. from Av. 2.8 out -3.4 aide 1 -.2 ml
Mey
Total 19 8 2 2 Ce) )
Dep. from Av. 457 net 4.0: anf -.5 -.2
June
Total 26 2 FS (e) [o)
Dep. from Av. 10.9 -4.4 -2.9 -2.2 -1.3 at
July
Total 17. ) 6 6 1 1
Dep. from Av. 4 -4.0 4 2.6 0 6
Total 19 1 5 (e) 5 0 al
Dep. from Av. 5.0 -2.7 -1.0 -3.2 2.6 -1.5 8
NORTHWAY
April
Total 17 8 & zh )
Dep. from Av. -3.0 1.35 Pe 8 -.2
Mey
Total 15 5 ff 3 1 (e)
Dep. from Av. -.9 -2.1 2.5 -6 1 2
June
Total 12 5 6 3 3 1
Dep. from Av 1 -2.6 2 aL 2.0 2
July
Total 14 3 9 i 3 af ()
Dep. from Av 2.2 -3.6 2.0 -2.6 1.7 7 -.4
August
Totel Data missing
1957
Precipitation in hundredths of en inch
O1- 10- 26- 50- 2.00-
i} Tr. og 25 49 39 2.99 2.00+
April
Total 19 5 6 (+)
Dep. from Av. -2.2 4 2.8 -.2
Total 23 6 2 fo) (+) Q
Dep. from Av. 3.2 5 -1.5 -1.4 -.5 -.2 -.1
June
Total 18 6 2 3 z [e) (e)
Dep. from Av. 3.3 ae) -3.1 8 -.2 -.6 -.4
July
Total 16 4 1h 1 2 z (+)
Dep. from Av. 1.7 -1.5 4 -.7 > ie) =.
August
Total 18 4 1 2 af
Dep. from Av. 4. -2.0 -1.5 -.1 2
April
Totel 26 3 Q 1 (+)
Dep. fron Av 2.9. =-.5 -2.9 6 --1
Mey
Total 2s 5 2 1
Dep. from Av. BC se: 4 6 a
June
Total 23 5 fe) () ie)
Dep. from Av. 2.8 -1.6 -3 -1.0 a) -.2
July
Totel 7 2 1
Dep. from Av Carte -1.7 -.7 -.3
August
Total 22 6 (e) i (e)
Dep. from Av. 4.5 4 -2.9 -1.6 -.3 -.1
GULKANA
April
Total 22 4 4 (e)
Dep. fron Av. -.4 -.2 1.4 -.8
May
Total 18 8 4 1
Dep. from Av. -1.3 -6 -5 ee] 3
June
Total 16 4 5 Q
Dep. from Av. --2 -1.2 -.1 2.2 -.5 -.2
July
Totel 17 1 io) 4 2 1 0
Dep. from Av. 1.5 -1.9 1.4 rhe -5 a -.1
August
Total 22 3 3 3 () (e)
Dep. from Av. 8.6 -2.0 -4.8 aul -1.3 -.6
McGRATH
April
Total 21 4 5 ° 0 ()
Dep. from Av. 2.7 -2.3 meat -1.1 Lane -.2
Total 19 5 4 2 2 [°)
Dep. from Av. 3.9 -3.7 -.8 5 25) -.2
June
Total 19 6 3 2 [°} (e)
Dep. from Av. 9.0 -3.6 -2.9 -1.2 6 -.4 -.3
July
Total 1¢ 8 6 3 () [e) fe)
Dep. from Av. 2.3 1.9 -1.0 2 -2.6 -.6 -.2
Augus®
Total ‘70 8 6 ie) ie) ie)
Dep. from Av. -.6 5.7 -.7 “2 -2.8 -1.
See footnote at end of teble.
108.
Table 20.--Departure from 9-year average precipitation by number of days per month in each intensity class--Continued
1958
ANCHORAGE
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
O1- 10- 26- 50- 1.00-
1°) irs 09 25 49 99 1,99 2.004
April
Total 22 3 4 a 0
Dep. from Av. 3.8 -4.0 3 oll ou -.1
May
Total ne 8 7 3 1
Dep. from Av. -3.8 -2.8 3.6 2.4 He =.1
June
Total 15 4 iG 2 2
Dep. from Av. 6 -2.9 1.9 -.8 =25) Lot
July
Total 8 9 2 3 2 1
Dep. from Av. -4.6 -.3 a9; -1.3 ae 1.6 8
August
Total 12 5 ai () [e)
Dep. from Av. 1.0 -.1 -.2 1.5 -1.0 Eales -.1
FAIRBANKS
a April
Total al 7 2 (0)
Dep. from Av. mille dso: -.4 -.2
May
Total 18 9 2 1 ae
Dep. from Av. 9 9 -2.2 -.1 6 -.1
June
Total ll 10 4 3 2 {0}
Dep. from Av. -i.5 1.8 -1.5 7 cI -.2 -.2
July
Total 13 10 5 al nb a6 0)
Dep. from Av. -l.1 3.8 -1.0 -1.6 ie} 0 a
August
Total 9 12 8 2 () fe)
Dep. from Av. -2.1 4.5 -.2 -1.4 -.3 -.4 ay
GALENA
April
Total 19 6 5 [s) [o)
Dep. from Av. 1.2 -1.0 -5 -.5 -.2
May
Total 12 rat 6 2
Dep. from Av. -2.7 1.2 1.5 4 -.3 -.1
June
Total 9 4 12 3 BE a 0
Dep. from Av. -5.7 -2.7 6.2 Y.1 6 6 =e
July
Total Data missing
Dep. from Av.
August
Total Data missing
Dep. from Av.
HOMER
April
Total LT 4 4 5 (0) ie)
Dep. from Av. 2.8 -2.9 —1.4 2.7 -.9 -.2 and
May
Total 8 8 12 2 al
Dep. from Av. -6.3 -.7 6.0 w6 5 -.2
June
Total ah 9 4 5 i)
Dep. from Av. -4.1 2.6 -.9 2.8 -.3 -.1
July
Total 14 3 6 5 2 a
Dep. from Av. -2.6 -1.0 A 1.6 1.0: 6
August
Total 12 4 8 5 ie} 2 1°}
Dep. from Av. -2.0 3 2.0 1.8 -2.4 5 -.2
NORTHWAY
April
Total 26 2 ay (e) aT,
Dep. from Av. 6.0 -4.7 Abr} -.2 8
May
Total 16 T 4 3 a
Dep. from Av. at S. -.5 -6 1 -.2
June
Total 23 1 4 J [e)
Dep. from Av. 11.1 -6.6 -1.8 -.9 -1.0 -.8
July
Total 13 9 ak 1 1
Dep. from Av. 1.2 6 2.0 -2.6 -.3 rt -.4
August
Total 14 6 5 2 3 1
Dep. from Av. 2.3 -1.3 -2.8 -.7 1.6 9
1/ Discrepancy
BIG DELTA
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
O1- 10- 26- 50- 1.00-
0 Tr. o9 25 49 99 17.99: 2,00+
April
Total 24 5 1 0
Dep. from Av. 2.8 -.4 -2.2 -.2
May
Total 23 a a 0 0 0
Dep. from Av. Sead -2.5 -1.4 -.5 -.2 a.
June
Total Ey, 6 5 if 1 () (e)
Dep. from Av. 2.3 4 -.1 -1.2 -.2 -.6 -.4
July
Total 15 11 2 2 0 a [e)
Dep. from Av. wii, 9 Die'0! -4.6 3 -1.8 0 =i
August
Total 15 Td 2 2 0 x
Dep. from Av. L4 5,0 -4.0 -.5 -2.1 2
FT. YUKON
April
Total 20 7 2 x 0
Dep. from Av. -3.1 3.5 -.9 6 -.1
Mey
Total al 6 3 1
Dep. from Av. -1.8 8 a6 6 -.2
June
Total 22 2 4 2
Dep. from Av. 1.8 -1.6 -.7 1.0 -.3 -.2
July
Total al 6 1 2 ab
Dep. from Av. ce) 1.7 -2.7 13 ot
August
Total 18 6 3 2 2
Dep. from Av. aa 14 -1.9 A at: -.1
GULKANA
wipril
Total ne} 10 1 ()
Dep. from Av. -3.4 5.8 -1.6 -.8
May
Total 13 13 3 2 ()
Dep. from Av. -6.3 5.6 -.5 1.5) -.3
June
Total 22 4 3 ph 0
Dep. from Av. 5.8 -1.2 -2.1 -1.8 5 -.2
July
Total 14 4 8 3 1 a
Dep. from Av. -1.5 1.1 6 2 -.5 2 1
August
Total Le 4 T 2 3 a
Dep. from Av. -6 -1.0 -.8 -.9 eT 4
McGRATH
April
Total 20 8 1 (0) at [e)
Dep. from Av. 1.7 1:7 -2:9 <-1.2 28 -.2
May
Total 12 10 8 ai [e)
Dep. from Av. -3.1 1.3 3.2 -.7 -.5 -.2
June
Total 6 9 10 5 (e) (e)
Dep. from Av. -4,0 -.6 4.1 1.8 -.6 -.4 -.3
July
Total 8 6 10 5 (e) 2 i)
Dep. from Av. -3.7 Ay 3.0 2.2 -2.6 1.4 2
Total 6 2 12 6 4 mn, te)
Dep. from Av. -1.6 -2.3 3.3 2 1.2 -.7 -.1
in basic data.
109
Teble 21. --Monthly precipitation and departure from normal
Avon January February March April May June July August September October November December Total
De Ant _De Amt De Amt Dep Amt De Amt De
Interior Basin
Big Delta 1.13 -64 .06 -.15 .69 -44 .07 -.28 .71 -00 .61 -1.82 3.37 -21 2.27 241 +43 -.88 -69 -29 .53
Fairbanks 2.00 : . . . : -86 -.56 2.50 -60 1.17 -1.00 -51 -.95 -51 -.36 .99
Fort Yukon -68 +26 .06 -.35 .27 -.05 .07 -.19 .13 -.32 .07 -.73 .06 -.94 -32 -.91 -62 -.09 -50 -.14 .48
-.-78 7.03 -1.17
-1.85 5.08 -1.50
-3.10 -65 -2.79
w
v
iv)
i)
oO
1
nm
oO
on
i)
'
ry
>
°
a
'
ie)
@
o
i)
1
w
o
Galena deh -63 .12 -.63 .18 -.63 .80 -66 .12 -1.33 1.88 -64 1.07 -1.60 2.58 -.25 1.87 31 -26 -.36 .33 -2.33 6.45 -1.58
McGrath 1.80 .68 .07 -1.23 .03 -1.11 .67 .28 .52 -.51 4.36 2.44 2.84 .46 2.82 -.76 2.13 -.29 .44 -1.42 .51 -2.40 11.21 1.77
Northway -98 .38 .04 -.38 .11 -.15 .03 -.37 .99 .30 .58 -1.42 4.83 1.94 .39 -1.83 .54 -.90 .23 -.31 .31 -2.72 6.82 -.95
Cook Inlet
Anchorage -83 -.01 Tr -.67 .29 -.26 .04 -.37 .10 -.40 1.90 1.20 .97 -.66 .92 -1.68 1.07 -1.51 .52 -1.66 .26 -.78 1.71 .86 8.61 -5.94 3.93 -1.98
Homer -71 -1.98 .16 -1.41 1.08 -.77 2.75 1.48 .50 -.64 1.40 -38 1.02 -.74 1.34 -1.78 2.63 -2.84 2.36 -1.57 .08 -2.32 1.44 -1.37 15.47 -13.56 7.01 -.94
Copper River
Gulkana -86 -.03 .39 -.04 Tr -.45 .06 -.37 Tr --47 .81 -.42 2.81 -70 53 -1.33 1.75 hy f 44 -.42 .87 -22 -73 -.23 9.25 -2.67 4.21 -1.59
Interior Basin
Big Delta -04 -.34 .30 14 416 =-.18 .04 =-.24 1.81 1:17 2.67 362.05 -.94 1.77 -21 -63 -.80 -3L -.19 .03 -.26 -18 -.15 9.99 -1.64 8.34 -14
Fairbanks +12 -.87 .27 -.24 .20 -.38 .01 -.28 .64 -.10 1.85 -48.1.37 -.55 2.97 Aiph alee gibt -1l -.81 Tr -.63 -13° -.37 8.99 -2.93 6.84 -26
Fort Yukon -19 -.19 .22 -.12 .12 -.16 .01 -.16 .02 -.30 1.00 -29 .66 -.30 1.16 -.12 89 -06 -45 -.12 .20 -.21 -67 -38 5.59 -.93 2.85 -.59
Galena -10 -.67 1.03 722 .20 -.54 .11 -.07 1.38 -75 2.15 46 .69 -2.00 4.02 1.18 1.10 -1.27 -34 -.30 .21 -.43 -35 -.27 11.68 -2.94 8.35 -32
McGrath +27 -.87 .97 -.18 .18 -.80 .24 -.25 1.98 1.04 1.12 -.941.15 -1.17 5.86 2.23 1.86 -.55 .33 -1.34 .21 -.88 .61 -.64 14.78 -4.35 10.35 -91
Northway -07 -.54 .06 -.28 .12 -.10 .11 -.24 1.35 -63 4.00 2.00 1.24 -1.65 2.12 -31 -95 -.23 -41 -.08 .07 -.29 -24 -.13 10.74 -.60 8.82 1.05
Cook Inlet
Anchorage -20 -.56 .48 -.10 .21 -.39 .15 -.25 .76 -25 .57 -.32 1.14 -.41 5.06 2.50 1.85 -.86 -81 -1.06 .11 -.89 1.11 -27 12.45 -1.82 7.68 1.77
Homer -98 -1.41 3.57 2.17 .21 -1.43 1.49 -16 2.04 1.04 .74 -.33 .16 -1.50 4.81 1.92 2.43 -.36 3.62 -08 2.74 -19 2.20 -.56 25.19 -.03 9.24 1.29
Copper River
Gulkana -18 -.61 .62 20 «4.47 -10 .18 -.03 .18 -.23 .72 -.47 1.09 -1.03 2.08 -21 21.39 -.74 -Tl -.03 .15 -.51 -92 -13 8.69 -3.01 4.25 -1.55
1954
Interior Basin F
Big Delta 48 -10 .05 -.11 .20 -.14 .13 -.15 1.15 -51 3.37 1.06 2.06 -.93 1.49 -.49 2.06 -63 -58 -.12 .19 -.10 -31 -.02 11.87 -24 .8.20 -00
Fairbanks -55 -.44 .21 -.30 .60 -.02 Tr -.29 .17 -.57 1.78 41 3.22 1.30 -84 -1.42 1.82 -61 708 -.84 .42 -.21 -48 -.02 10.17 -1.75 6.01 -.83
Fort Yukon -58 =20) 27,7 -=.0%) 1.28 -00 .0l -.16 .10 -.22 .41 -.30 1.26 -30 92 -.36 OHH teak -41 -.16 .84 43 -79 -50 6.64 -12 2.70 -.74
Galena -19 -.58 .18 -.63 .35 -.39 .23 -05 .09 -.54 .95 -.74 2.81 -12 1.79 -1.05 1.87 -.50 -41 -.25 1.45 -.19 -44 -.18 9.76 -4.86 5.87 -2.16
McGrath -63 -.51 .28 -.87 1.04 -06 .29 -.20 .34 -.60 1.83 -.23 4.73 2.41 5.22 -.41 3.59 1.18 -73 -.94 1.85 -76 1.43 -18 19.96 -83 10.41 -97
Northway -16 -.45 .15 -.19 .18 -.04 .14 -.21 1.52 -80 1.71 -.29 1.21 -1.68 -60 -1.21 -90 -.28 eel =.28 219° -.17; +51 14 7.48 -3.86 5.18 -2.59
Cook Inlet
Anchorage -56 -.20 .18 -.40 .97 -37 .03 -.37 .15 -.36 .91 -02 2.08 53 2.13 -.43 1.66 -1.05 2.02 -15 .93 -.07 1.00 -16 12.62 -1.65 5.30 --61
Homer P.129=2.27 676: —.64° 1.93 -29' .O1 -1.32 .43 --.57 :26 -.81 1.90 -24 4.13 1.24 1.47 -1.32 4.63 -89 2.44 -.11 1.34 -1.42 20.42 -4.60 6.73 -1.22
Copper River
Gulkana -33 -.46 .52 -10 .22 -.15 .00 -.21 .39 -.02 .69 -.50 1.94 -.18 1.48 -.39 1.75 -.38 -86 -12 .61 -.05 84 -05 9.63 -2.07 4.50 -1.30
1957
Interior Basin
Big Delta 1.35 -97 1.33 1.17 .46 -12 .11 -.17 .03 -.61 1.05 -1.26 1.92 -1.07 1.65 -.33 -T2 -.71 -63 =1300 09) —-20 i. 06! -23 9.90 -1.73 4.76 -3.44
Fairbanks 192 +93 £56 -05 .15 -.43 .08 -.21 .07 -.67 .21 -1.16 .40 -1.52 -40 -1.86 -47 -.74 -7T4 -.18 .30 -.33 -25 -.25 5.55 -6.37 1.16 -5.68
Fort Yukon 56 -18 .38 704 .22 -.06 .13 -.04 .23 -.09 .22 -.49 .27 -.69 -38 -.90 -58 -.23 -45\.-.12) (.49 -08 -26 -.03 4.17 -2.35 1.23 -2.21
Gelena 1.10 -53 2.79 -.02 .49 -.25 .17 -.01 .73 -10 .18 -1.51 1.40 -1.29 2.14 -.70 1.76 -.61 1.00 -36 1.63 a «49 -.13 11.88 -2.74 4.62 -3.41
McGrath 3.67 2.53 1.11 -.04 .72 -.26 .19 -.30 .82 -.12 .42 -1.64 .79 -1.53 1.21 -2.42 2.17 -.24 1.43 -.24 1.53 44 -53 -.72 14.59 -4.54 3.43 6.01
Northway +43 -.18 .47 215.29 -O7 .43 -08 1.21 49 2.12 12 2.51 -.38 Missing data 23T -O1 43 -06
Cook Inlet =
Anchorage 1.36 -60 .67 -09 .20 -.40 .01 -.39 .02 -.49 .56 -.33 1.64 -09 2.02 -.54 3.21 -50 +93 -.94 1.51 ol -56 -.48 12.49 -1.78 4.25 -1.66
Homer -94 -1.45 .83 -.57 .42 -1.22 .76 -.57 .37 -.63 .09 -.98 2.26 -60 3.04 -15 4.30 1.51 3.63 -.11 6.00 3.45 2.35 -.41 24.99 --23 6.52 -1.43
Copper River
Gulkana -51 -.28 .49 .0O7 .09 -.28 .11 -.10 .42 -01 1.04 -.15 2.67 -55 -66 -1.21 3.41 1.28 1.56 362" 351 -=-15 41 -.38 11.88 -18 4.90 -.90
1958
Interior Basin
Big Delta -38 -.03 .06 -.10 .36 -02 .0Ol -.27 .08 -.56 .79 -1.52 1.07 -1.92 -96 -1.02 -75 -.68 -90 -40 .44 15 -25 -.08 6.02 -5.61 2.91 -5.29
Fairbanks -31 -.68 .07 -.44 .24 -.34 .09 -.20 .57 -.171.01 -.36 1.42 -.50 -61 -1.65 46 -.75 -84 -.08 .40 -.23 -41 -.09 6.43 -5.49 3.70 -3.14
Fort Yukon -68 -30 .07 -.27 .26 -.02 .15 -.02 .17 -.15 .39 -.32 .82 -.14 .97 -.31 -22 -.59 1.22 -65 1.17 -76 34 -05 6.46 -.06 2.50 -.94
Galena -80 205 .21 -.60 .59 -.15 .11 -.07 .47 -.16 1.69 00 3.53 -84 2.46 -.38 Missing data 8.26 -23
McGrath -36 -.78 .18 -.97 .64 -.34 .32 -.17 .44 -.50 1.10 -.96 2.88 -56 3.73 -10 2.95 54 -81 -.86 .68 -.41 -17 -1.08 14.26 -4.87 8.47 -.97
Northwey -20 -.41 .18 -.16 .16 -.06 .43 -08 .76 -04 .51 -1.49 1.47 -1.42 2.94 1.13 1.07 -.11 1.05 -56 .32 -.04 +23 -.14 9.32 -2.02 6.11 -1.66
Cook Inlet
Anchorage 1.05 229 07. -.52 219: =.42 <25 =.25 1.05 -54 2.19 1.30 4.44 2.89 1.67 -.89 1.351 -1.40 1.93 -06 1.41 41 +54 -.30 16.10 1.83 9.60 3.69
Homer 3.74 1.35 .48 -.92 1.69 -05 .86 -.45 1.12 -12 1.12 -05 2.48 -82 2.89 -00 2.37 -.42 2.08 -1.66 4.72 2.17 1.05 -1.71 24.62 -.60 8.49 -54
Copper River
Gulkana 1.02 .23 .24 -.18 .33 -.04 .01 -.20 .33 -.08 .29 -.90 1.73 -.39 2.02 .15 1.10 -1.03 1.66 .92 .84 .18 .87 .08 10.44 -1.26 4.38 -1.42
SS EE
Source: USWB Climatological Data, Alaska Annual Summary, for the years mentioned.
110
Table 22.--Precipitation intensity classes, according to frequency of occurrence by decades of the month
1950-58)
(Av.
BETHEL
Time
of
ANCHORAGE
Time
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
1,0-
-50-
+99
+26-
.10-
225
April
-O1-
09
1.0-
1.99
«50-
eee)
-26-
.10-
«25
April
0.1
-O1-
of
Month
2.0+
+49
Drs
Month ie}
2.0+
249
-09
Tr.
0
3.3 2.0
2.2
4.6
3,9
S.1
16
1-10
11-20
21-30
Total
0.1
2.0; 220
3.0
5,8
1-10
11-20
21-30
0.1
5.8
6.6
18.2
mil
2. 5.4
25
2.0 1.0
8225855
Total
Ma.
May
=2
1-10
11-20
21-31
Total
1-10 528 126 13
11-20
21-31
0.1
ne
8.6 6.8
12.0
wl
15.8 10.8 3.4 6
Total
June
June
+6
12
2.8 2.4
3.3 2,0
2.4 2.6
8.5 7.0
eye
3.0
3
1-10
11-20
21-30
Total
ol
el
2.7 1.35
5.4
4,4
4.6
14.4
1-10
11-20
21-30
Total
1.9 2.0
2.9) 1.8
8
9
9.6
July
July
9
1-10
11-20
21-31
4.3 2.0 1.9
1-10
tral TAC}
2.1 4.2
625 G92
Bie)
260
O.1
11-20 4.1 2.3 1.8
4.2 2.0 2.4
12
21-31
Total
0.2
9.35
Total
6.3 6.1
6
August
puso)
August
1.0
2.3 3.6
alal
2.4
1-10
11-20
21-31
Total
1.7 2.4
3.7
1-10
ca
lieey iia
11-20
21-31
Total
1.2
4.7
1.8
2.5 2.4
6eteTse
2.4
11.0
5.9
i417.
3.5
BIG DELTA
Time
of
BETTLES
Time
of
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
1.0-
1.99
-10- -26- .50-
«99
225
April
.O1-
1.0-
-50-
99
-10- .26-
+25
April
0.3
.O1-
2.0+
+49
.09
Ta
Month 0
2.0+
1.99
49
209
Tre
(e)
Month
1.9 1.4
6.7
7.4
1-10
11-20
21-30
Total
0.1
2.8 1.3
5.4
6.8
1-10
11-20
21-30
Total
enh
alc snlal
Lobe 0)
5.4 3.2
nee
21.2
Meals
+2
6
6.6 3,3
19.3
Ma,
1-10
11-20
21-31
Total
6.9 1.4 1.2 4
1-10
onl
el
7.9
11-20
21-31
a)
2.0 1.9
5.7
1958
A
wale
8
3.8 1.3
7.6 3.6
5.2
18.4
Total
June
June
8
“6
1.9 1.2
1.6 2.0
210, 250:
6.8
1-10
11-20
21-30
1.3 1.0
3.2 1.1
6.8
1-10
11-20
21-30
Total
4.2
O.1
4.4
3.7
el
16.0
July
+3
1-10
11-20
21-31
July _
Hf
1-10
11-20
21-31
Total
1.9 2.8
4.5
1.3
1.8 1.8
4:9
16.3
August
August
man
200
a
iio Oo
at
ODD 09
doa
AOD
aud
ht 0
St xt
Oud
oan
att
tad
dda
a
ano
anAD
Haw
dod
ooo
ada
oot
aw
st xt te
6 6 60
od
oan
al
tad
daa
13.6
Total
2.6
3.2
10.2 7.6 6,2
Total
YUKON
Fr.
FAIRBANKS
Time
of
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
Time
of
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
1.0-
109)
.50-
099
-26-
249
.10-
225
April
O.1
.01-
109
1.0-
1.99
.50-
+99
+26-
-10-
225
April
.O1-
.09
2,0+
Ite
Month fe)
2.0+
+49
Tr.
ie)
Month
1.6 1.4
6.9
1-10
11-20
2.3 1.0
1.8
6.7
7.4
1-10
2
1.0 1.2
7.6
o.1
“7
11-20
Ald
fo)
ol bed
11D
fat]
a]wo
ro)
co)
|
a
old
mela
ie
jo
Qe
Ala
hls
a
oly
Ajo
oly
ld
uu
ola
m]0
tye
do
UIE
Mey
1-10
11-20
21-31
May
3
(a =p Rae eT}
1-10
11-20
21-31
Total
8.2
5.9
Q.1
4
§.2 2.4
22.8
Total
17.1
June
June
1-10
11-20
21-30
2
-8
ZaF ae
5.9
eee)
1-10
11-20
21-30
Total
O.1
6
x)
otis ltset
1.8 2.2
6.9
5
20.2
OF
3.4 2.1
2.2 2.5
4
3.7
12.5
Total
1.1
2.3
8.2 5.5
July
1.3 1.6
6.9
1-10
11-20
21-31
July
1-10
11-20
21-31
Total
6.9
Wise
21.0
yi es
2.3 2.4
6.2 6.0
oe)
4
14.1
Total
1.0
2.6
August
August
1-10
11-20
21-31
Total
2) Bee 2.
2.6 2.1
2.1. 3.9
3.7
4
1-10
11-20
21-31
ath
6
-9
aC Re eal
5.3
17.5
2.8
17
Tio’ 8.2
pal
Total
pO Bk
f the month--Continued
of occurrence by decedes of
(Av. 1950-58)
clesses, according to frequenc
Table 22.--Precipitation intensit
+
° 3 ct det
a) a a .
nol 7
oj! oO Blio
da fet FIO O 12 O|M AIO oO A le let
° ° oe Aad ht Fl ae : z ale
° aie 3 eet 3
4 is]
a
aa} “4
an 8]o m °
wf? alou rt et ola a to al a lw a (ol at fo m0 410 IO co 4} rt tals aril yt tt at |o
sive herd Beara bars : a bi oe ° ry ° : ele vee siiaeprs ize Pierce) pers uw ° ‘ Be or ee aloe ‘
a f=) a ° ct rif =| °
o e We}
a a) o
wo; t oll ole
4] HIS & £100 Or
aia dale idan iInqale ja qae AA vedio iia je jeer jagai foarte I cil at ele joie alr.
3 3 dq fa 5 [S) dq dt rt rifal J [o) et eee |
a a 5
lol \ et ard 4] 4 et
ral o bl} ‘ » Ald wl be} o b] an Ald wl o bl 4
He @rila ble riciin gleam ojo jt ritala wisi colo BE UBIS TIO glo mol girit iin ja weil Ble rj lay cif UPR rf culo Hlataol~ lo staly Bla ilo
bere bird eee bats ati bard oyketie| se erie ele e ef Ade ce ele) | Safe eel ve eiiehete| xe eleeie|ie ene bars Booed |=4 aia fe B[vececeles ‘Blow gi ele re hat
qo 4 w al (St) kh Arita iy Ay iS =</O Nu ist] Hid ei Ble et Ato Bhi rte S | ro) 6 A Iu Bla a alo Bla dale
oe An
x -
oy} t gy}
PIA oO 4
moO 10 Ih A fio Ah ele mo ast im culo "IO O| | 0 x10 co xt =| Im « ri] AO Olt OO] Ja @ eijrt 0 AO w@ln D9 rA}to
cl a A rife ria rifio aa cule cla ole oat it fst rl rt aifio A rt allio al a aifeo cl ri” eifta qi ria oo a dole
re)
o o
oo wla eo eo a | It ey 2 ou 0 O>|D AO alo El og} [wh ale oo alo a © ho sto Olay & og] feeds a oO i} Vo alo
elt tsi Mt cut AM rt fio ea fa rd tlio ey Joy a cut A 00 t9}c0 At tls at fio By fal aft a al 4 alo al al ale
a
o| eels uM aura an ela oO tio It cy wo] o| Ine ain I~ th cole oO © «o} O19 Ole é wd Old (Co) Hw ol 19 uO
soe nis |ice vinte ove|ine ehatesicre iu! Gand |g Pier fi) Boker bie ° Ae se ele aiayeinye | oe ° vie bas ° cereiner [a 2 Y
ee ee © © ©] Im 09 w]eco lo =H fie to 19 fra 19 Ht stat sts tro seat sto 1200 Io oo hla © 10190 19 10
i a st rA ct rel et rt i 8 N bE FA NS
3 g
=] 4 9 alc oO let 9 Ql Oo [rt °o Art c 9 Ql oO let 2 Qlet O° let Oo rllret 4 ool on
tg] @ B} Jo VM] g O48) g oUMlg oo e/g ot] y 9 RB) loMmly OV OM 4) q oN) a oH ely #| Joa mia oan’
isi i=] ett ty eat 8 Cn LL ett rat a isi eee ie ee ett ot Le Ge ent Sieh st rt ft tie et tip
|e 94 0 Vet lo tt fo tet fo Vet lo Vet tf oO trl 44 O Vet aie Vet Alo et lo rt Ao Vet Alo ° teal Re) Trt fo
ler Oo Sy det et cules eet let ee ae ules eet cles Ale Oo Sl tet cules ett les eet les at ley at ules m0 Sa tet et cules at le
+ +
° ° 4
al a a
< cl
Pio ol] | oD 1o
oo O dq fa BJO o qa fa dela FIO O rit
wllet et ° qi °. al"! et °
' aa] “alt
lO Oo 98]o o]O OD
O}ia oO cle cust ra too 19 @fio nl(2 2) Iriel ta a rilar Ae 10 i]s © 0 wha al? ® et Vt aloe Om lo
a f) a 2 o fa =| ° i]
GC Lu ao
we} o o
mo) I wo] t wt
@}.O ee AS &
Aust) [ett jo MU Afro a ast A «0 co]co © 19 Ia aa] Jeo alo A cufio 0 © s/t Aa blo em 19 1O}sH cy st rt ijou Cot [oe HO mH
g ° qi fa 4 ° fa fa dla 3 ° ra vy
a &
& re
® by] » Ale ole ~p si} t det a
g bl | et a AHO tobe bo} oD na ATO WO] ret o b>]
vd aye gles ajo Blt raln Biriw wiry Biri ilo asa sere gto gorau lomo" pln a rij aA RIN HHO iris tla gia olin loro) Mo w alt
8 fal qi ri to Bit rf t}co 9 =i|O [ov] ec) CV) (| (Cr = | | 9 <i] | 5 A Rl AM tit et cut
id . p ra re
pli 8\ ay t
Q]ct 1 Pla o
PIO Of fet a aif Im Oo who wo o|a0 to stir MO Ole lOO] Jo =10 ri}o 00 m|n It oO alo loo x10 ‘AO O] Jao ho I~ A Alo It 0 yl UD cule 12M Old
tel|les ve. eee oisenrelive nireigxe| se eipaeiiue |e! ce elle fle ve] | ce atatanie |e oe ele Pest tn ered bard . siarehee] hiv 5 Beco Ro detien [a0 Tien |e
i} dt lt A [st A a ho a alo a cut a al da alo aw rt|st AM tho rt alco Pa det the AM tlt el als a lo ac cult
Dal °o
° o o
© om elo no alo Cerat ial [ad = cy «o] st I) co «9 |co fi +} lo tm co al Ceo be x19 110 daa de HH ogl Jas cre MO a] lo who rm colo io & ho
rw Bl jue lal 2 roo A Cy cu]io a a ]o aa lo ay fa A Ct }o0 aa to elt ct} it alte EY [ro a uo ey ay 18 Joo re alt rt uo eu a cut
a)
wo Oo Mo MD 6 LO [> ete (ho oO oOlo It co Ot °o os old mW wo] A |e iM st O] co MA OlO 5 Oo st ayo rt st Ort eo HO OM 9} Ah& hwo
0 0 ol> ho xt sat] tt x0 thst sot to 12 too 10 tt tt 1 xt xt 1 st who 19 1 Oo st 0 tt] =tt xf 10 wo] tt © 10 ol 10 in 10 10 tlt a ait
q - rt cl al qt dA ca qi fa A a rt Pa
a
a 9 gla ° let ° Ola oO Ir od-r 2 9 Qlrt Onl 9 gle O let oO dle fa a rome) tal Aled 2 Ie oO let
2 #8] joa mlg oyelg oye] Oo MO] on ]'g 2 P] jou mg oye ou Mm) g ou M]'g oO 4 ]'g gJo 6! loarl’d oO 4 fla IO 1] "g oul
8. 8] lat t ott rit t oth tl4 at ide BH. st] Jat tle att alt l4 rol id aot ids Be Bf lst y we riot ida rot + ati
Wi GV O tet A}o ' A} oO 1a] Oo 1 et Alo tet ayo Ofna ww O tet A] o let Ao lato {ret AO ae] oO rt GW O tao 1A] o [aro 1 A et] oO
& Ol lar cules ett les et Oulet Ae alee ae les mle o sy fea et alles ct oles ee rt et OE rt ales paler O sal [at cules ett les ett Ole rit le
112
2.0+
2.0+
1.0-
1.99
1.0-
1.99
-50-
99
2
6
-50-
-99
+26-
49
plaae
of
-26-
249
0.1
st
-10-
225
April
May
June
4
2.6
July
Au
1.3
-10-
+25
April
Ou7
A
2
1.3
5.3
3.5
3.1
.O1-
.09
-01-
109
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
6.6 7.1
6.4 8.8
2.9.2.5
8.5 7.4
2.6 2.6
2.9 2.4
3.6 1.9
9.1 6.5
8.0 8.2
le eece
anf 2.0:
2.6 1.8
7.0 6.0
Tr.
ie)
3.4
3.7
9.6
2.1
6.4
5.3
4.8
5.4
Total 15.5
of occurrence by decades of the month--Continued
2.5
Total 12.6
Total 11.0
Total 10.0
Time
of
Month
1-10
21-30
1-10
21-31
1-10
21-30
1-10
Total
1-10
11-20
21-31
Total
SUMMIT
Time
of
1-10
11-20
21-30
to frequenc
1950-58)
(Av.
2.0+
2.0+
1.0-
1.99
0.1
el
el
1.0-
1.99
.50-
«99
0.1
+50-
Re?
+26-
49
.26-
249
2.8
o.1
st
-10-
225
April
-6
ay
June
1.3
8
LL
3.2
July
-10-
225
April
72
O.1
2.7
5.8
-O1-
209
-O1-
209
‘7
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
Precipitation in hundredths of an inch
2.2 lial.
3.1 1.8
8.7 4.8
3.3 2.2
Tr.
2.7 2.1
3.6 1.6
9.6) “5:9
Vea Sel
1.4 2.3
153° 3.3:
ASS SBN.
Ins
ese 184
2.2
Cay)
ie)
(e)
5.8
4.8
3.7
2.7
3.6
Total 10.0
pallet g
YA
3.3
1.6
7.6
6.4
7.3
6.3
Table 22.--Precipitation intensity classes, accordin
Total 15.1
NORTHWAY
Total 20.0
McGRATH
Time
of
Month
1-10
21-31
1-10
11-20
21-30
1-10
Total
1-10
11-20
21-31
Total
Time
of
Month
1-10
11-20
21-30
+
°
fot)
ro)
ol 1 D
Ald Dod te) lO D aaa
| ce . pe | Darter : %
2 da °
i>
3
wt
Cilome.
fat] fal daa ao QUA ala on o]+ ol[2® a alu Sued bod 1c co ht
o d da s io nu
Pp
a)
ot
K]O @
AM alo Ud at tot stfu Ow oi> gia uu jw ure Md Alo mt o> ao qm
arya day Ala Pf °o Ala Addy
oy ea d ~
b 2 a od b| © >) o
3 E aa FA s]t be 3 s dq a
=a 3 “AO Wy] A = 3 3
maria Bydooln Blan old iB |OmerS |e g(t Uz|u ele mr {oO Blt aolo Bln dala 3B} © o]o
dq Adal dials daa| 6 ° a 4 dale “Na dolls
a
P
BA
co Afro AM Ola Qh +} om Ala ‘jo o] [howe Oo A} tO alt oo t/q © 4 OI
ddaujwo Aan Ae Ada} QU 2 ]00 “A ddalm jou tel be) Catinat] [red a a
°
o
ra tO }~o om olo th cy st]ro he Oe] & cg) Jaenia oo +|o dt old onda onM old
cu 6 au foo QM Aloo aa do ddA Alwo 3 eo la cy 0 wo] tld ma culo Anao
d a dq
OW ala Oh alo om bo x tO} et ost olo hh ro ]ro oo olo tt O]H @ dala
Coptrale) ies Simro) bers ape [ize Htion ico ° Sieur [tae ean |e i ° a iescwis | pe sisaee
ho Ht w}io ta mlo ro MO nr © cy]co fa two st]< KO Ht <Hio Ho t]ro Peel Coal anaao
q q q a dq 4 dq d
M
Odd lomo} tel odd Oda 3 s lomo) fal Oda lomo} ta Odd OdlA
lo Mg om) ou Ms outs o 8} jouM a lous ON Mg ound oul
aot if. dot tlp aot ile aot ide =|s gs} Jar tle aot ile aot ile aot tle ati
lado tad lo taco ' ado Z)AwW o taalo teat afo Va ajo Valo ta ilo
ddale daale Adve AaAale Sila o ml ladaale aaale Aaale AAale adage
+
fo}
a
<
S14 2 on
nm |< qo fA sifomay a la ala Cl tol A
aes [pes : . Ba beret . : : : re
° 4 ad ° % ra
ci 3
alt so)
Blo o o
aja MC foo A aura rome) a ja 1m d\+ dd ala md oly 3
. coe ef ers ed ee : “ +| ° .
° s ° qd °
Pp
Bo} ea
wo} t )
LJ o o
(oC ed (2) at alo bh 62 ro]to ww HI) gia ual dd wlo UD old at o]o 5
d d dq 3 ° ja Ala a
& da Pe
~ at o >| a &
ta) 2 >| o st i >] s a FA ©
oS g ‘| a) “AO Ww] Q] 3 3 3 c=)
Alt ose Bio wim Baral ajo Byxt i co [t= a2 s|[u de Siu rja Bite Ryo win 3/0 © elo
Ajo Ala ddAyme @f a iw i) ° q a ia ala qa alt £
Be}
ot un
JP]a@ o
Om Of hb © MI Aono sted 4]oo ‘dio Oo] Janne hu w}wo cut wlou co 82 ule lam olo 3
dq Cyst AA. I Cu (vai) [ad od ° au a Ae ddl ddd Anant BA
3)
o
ly et dt dlo KO cy coco Ot a] & +] [Om alr oarlau danlo DD A|m tr wo] 3
angie cis) ihe ees hs aoe: lela aoe a ties £3 trae) i ah aves Brat hel hi cimken ee ike seksi be o
uN mw AN wulo cu cy cu] Ee] jad alo cu 4 cul cu cu cufeo aaae ua Alo a
5
WO O|D orn ola oa o}o co cu | mm to Ia AO) KU DH] 9m Oho c©on|o
sieceian |e. stay ees |e wieteiire ire Erased bee ° * pene) bat selene Senco |e cas 3 oH
19 oO +h tet ola tH tt} tr ola ort KO «oO wlco ot tho ww Hho mt M]o o
a d dq dq iat) a a qd a °
<x 3
Oo Ald O|A a On|Aq = cot 9 Old Odd ome} tal Od|q Ood|A ro
lo MMI a oasis oa als lo UM] g <|o 2] |oVlg Io NMG ou] loa mld ound a
aot ile aot tl, eee it il 8s ss] Jatt rot ie at ile at ile aot il,
td alo tao ta alo 'aalo <l-A HO taealo Yaalo taajo tao 1 alo
Ia TE AAale dadale aid cules ele oS] Ja aale aAae aaale adaale aaale
1.0
8.2
-6
Temperature, degrees F.
30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89
6.3
8.7
6.3
2
1800 11.2
2100
0300 14.4
0900
1500 13.1
Av.
BE
0300
Ti
of
da:
Per month in each temperature clas:
=
re, degrees F.
SS SSS SS
(av. 1950-58)
0.8
Mey
Temperatu
6.6
ert!
ime
of
day 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89
0900
B9
Table 23.--Air temperature by hour of dey, and number of
0.2
April
eee
3.6
Me:
Temperature, degrees F. 1/
0.7
SEE eee
15.9
16.8
30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80
aly et
9.0
ANCHORAGE
Time
of
da:
0300
1200 10.8
1500
0900
Av.
——s te +g) 0 wom me
oo bol DA) 19/9 feu tal =a Aft hero wo © 19 9)
el eta tet 3 ° cal vie) fal a
Aonm Ia ADAMO oho betOrd Aon fo 2 mow aio Ot et wl 12 M19 Ax ANNO rife
) © © ei} me oo ato tet Ho Ore Taq wo mq alo UE om als
0 |=
©
SU) Cec sired | st 1 CY 69 tA} Mh VO 1 O10 AOrRO oO flo Cal NFA Of Om oh «© th [st MUCH AIP noo0°0 19]
{10 4 Bao Qola Hata QV O]o Ww Oro alo ® | ° Nom sat AMD et tet 4ouo ra) o
balls Sete hilt | Aad 019 ade etic ince) ed ei ‘
» - rod
wu det u
10M OO FRR tat 10 Ob Ht ]19 SU h a tle Bala non a joes tjo gia. 910 OAH lr MID st] att
et O M}o0 jqant er slo $000 Ole slam 9 vi] PL? I Al oaa HOOO Ala lo wwf ceo Oban wl slowar rt
icles S]rt my Alet let ria Aetetet le @ |p | ey Va]rt la ale yet
8, 8 rH Ee a Ed
© 0 0 &]o am oO oO Ohh tet OD at st COD NOt OO MI aig rit rial tole Cu Dt ot Poi jm 4 ch eyo IU ia IL) bo stot & 19 of CO
apctoaahaze| fie vakelureineiienae [ire sfelrei sien venue |e Mungo bre eu | te toe ee UW ole epcintevedieie/i Ul beta | a one ew eu le ve ee ele oe 8 6 Helos
Or Ko 12 et et tO] st Sma ci{ro wana ait ei] oNuM rm woul Moo 0 Wb] ou wet] 10 det rit til waist
A tells et cl Gal et g | ‘d a d i: ta |
8 8 8 8 8
1m UO +10 OA eet Al fo in et ON wo re Dl [a arr + ait rit DOH cule Ke P Alto i il bl &
1 ot o]wo ia) [e) fal fo) 3 aoan orl YO) 1S) 60 110 et a mo (te) G
4
e2e00000 lIoe290000 eo00000 © e900000 e9090000 e0000 ooo ° jOn000
SS90000}, essesessc. Bgeeso|; . br 1250990). g8eeecs SB88esea|. 858850). Saaeae .
BH qe @ ils pep reais achat aA Ua Core te ft wg SoM ea ct ie pda Ed oe Pept CNH) Pa] CP | Ss RNC (Ma oO oe
OOM et et lat COtn ANS COA AANIS file O COA nt ANS OO ret A Mat OOded ri ula COA nANI a OOn Aes Ml
itr raat [et o ret AO OM Kil rt tt eA] +a wo [st
3 tat ° Ama rt mo ‘le ci
[=]
(3)
Ob tt M]J/t tm MO bc hah it oO AO MO MY UI ONO Ofet tO oO HO oNraD |o
vad tet unr te fal Po Onde 490 @ 9/0 ort Oo at oe
—
vw |R
oO
nna In tt 1c loo Or ow {co 00M Olt at UOr@ fio 4m @ O}st aA O10 colo OHA H lo tm 01010 st |
Aaa MOM @ Who OnOOt|> r4 1 2 © |x a liit Ore” WON |o ee Ws ae ce AO rt 4 Olr at Vt lo
Ad 3 (9 Ale Ad dtet elle Arla a ele ata A
u > q a rj
)
ONUMM WORNMM est PIM OM Fo H/o Or Ho © ola B Jo |i] 2 to Ofte PVOERHKOAIY ar ONnUHaD HOM DO r1o OO UO A MIO —
Heads Slwqww0w Woawardtals slonsonale BUBB stats ales BIN OY of st rt 8]i6 od Hs Filo BQ AMM WAI Bley iw om of rly
eet ey acted Acad alet aetna aa vo g |o|s Aaa eaet Blt taal Sia alt et ae
wo
o
© MQ xt co} VOM h a lo AVM Of wOl> PHONO rly Bla} jroo oolo 19H Ot &1O O19 1 GIO lO HK I9 alo Mm OM tO Mla
rf OY 19 olay 1 19 th st 10 colm M10 rt et to] att 10 dA wy who aM or Aad to 000M 10 MIO at ilo or faa 1 diols
eet et eifet ae foal tl Q adet a fal et a ‘
rt to atrt Ome wolH io) let al |jnocooo0l|n onmonrlo 7) i) qt rit rifst
Ot 0 A) ie) E Fa BRC SCO} Beh Ol 13 Eat rit ro} rt [av]
ooo line0000 loeg000 la00000 2020000 o00000 2900000
838838}. Sesaqe. S88saa|. SS0006 Ale hl |[2@S0G050].- Se0oG0|. A2S90000|. SOSOG00|. SOSSG05)}.
10.0 oP RAaAKDSaDS SSR RC UGS CONT The pebeditey Pabst tte Gh Q4 eaters a ea | [et pees Mie iad Ue pel ets A Pa Ih SERRE ICA LO aT ES ECR RO Fc er
eto lad Sodan ala OOM ete Ula OOrlre wld mo eal loodrn ala 9OntA AM OOrdet et lat OOdet ead let OOnAA Me
AN et al or et 4 aa st o Hoot cl ow |
° al med NMA IA tal
oO
a Pato ola AMO UO rao o fo Alka a UNDO |at tora ola At 19 9 w]o oavoh aly
° Aor dea aot lu waar Fait ° 1 10 rt] OO oO tho ath ost [to
a |
r
tO > rio I tO 19 Oho lO WORE tle sig anor jt Caan elo KU Ow CY let tt ay io wo]to tO © ef Ola
ce el “Gago we Aqrowaly o|t ° aorw |e 9 110 O10 aot 10 19 Oly {AMO HOMm|H
ov ~ a ldbed ll ettesttret S| 712 | ea a a aetet et etl Arta ed
5 ”
4 a
tio oaln ooaanoa|n Poor oaan|on B Jos ia ADAH JOodOr ay BUNaed arly Pra Q or a wrt Or OOM ri\st
ao 10 Hloawaqwohs Baragcdn|d SIRE dana |i BRHwowsrle Shooraawls Blacovno lo BC 19 O xK wolay
eget A RA AN 6 et Ae £ISi< Al dete a Blaed let las al taal lett rt tet
Qt xt tlt ro xt st O & Oly it Ca (se) wot A AH O|D BIS) |waoun alo mo wom oh] eK Or CO xt PO] r4 OMG HH I/D ta © ofo
ow the OM a et et wpe | ad taal Cs) et byt PALCouraegiscni cults Cy iO 1a 1S tM mt sit} ly led ate Ww
aA A Met et g te a let cl
1 o]co © et bl rtlet 2 Ql [a ot a © alo Uc 19 HOY a) fa (ry QI et]
eile i E ' ONO Det HO 1 et ty tlt i)
id 8 a rele qt
a
® e00000 loe90000 ee20000 loeea000 eo0000
838838]. B8e8aK8a|. S88sass. S8s8ssi. oa, mw IGOSGRG0 Se2e0000|. SOSG0G00|. O2S0G00|; Soq0q00|.
10 edt] baad 10 0 et] > RES C9 09 tee It tA M10 0 ri > Wid 3 9 BAYH o> Peds ic ae ba Ds Cai CYA CO ret 2 DQ 1) tle Poesia ea
ait Nat Sonn aA ala SOntnANa OOAdM eA Mla 4 oO OOM eet Ula 9OntAAMIS OOnA et wl OOtAA Mla GOnAA Ml
Table 23.--Air temperature by hour of day, and number of days per month in each temperature class--Continued
(Av. 1950-58)
GALENA GULKANA HOMER
ae Temperature, degrees F. eae Temperature, degrees F. eee Temperature, degrees F.
day 50-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 day 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 ‘80-89 day 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89
April April April
0300 «6.1 2 0300 5.6 0300 16.2 12
0900 9:50. 2.4 0900 16.0 6.0 0-4 0900 17.6 10.3 0.1
1200 9.9 6.6 0.9 1200 11.7 13.8 9) 0.3 1200 12.0 16.7 one
1500 10.6 7.6 Le O-c 1500 11.1 13.9 2.3 ak 1500 11.6 16.6 1.1
1800 11.2 6.4 0) ae 1800 16.1 8.2 Bley) aah 1800 17.3 10.8 ne
2100 (10.3 oma 3 2100 _ 14.2 a0, 2100 21.1 2.8
Av. 925) 4.3 6 al. Av. 12.4 2 1.0 72 Av. 15.9 9.7 4
Ma. May May
0300 14.0 ote 1.0 0300 21.3 4.0 0300 18.4 CIBC)
: 0900 3.8 13.4 10.3 a2 0900. 1.9) 16:1 12.0 1.0 6900) ase [25.7 4.1
1200. 2:37 7.8 14.2 5.0 0.2 1200 7) “O20 1459 5.0 0.4 1200 6 (22.8 Hirt) o.2
1500 2.3 T.8 12.4 1.6 =f 1500 +7 11.0 14.0 4.7 6 0.1 1500 9 23.2 6.8 el
1800 2.8 T.9 beets B 7.0 4 1800 1.4 T659 9.8 2.6 2 1 1800 eal 26.1 2.8
2100) 3.7. 1274 11.0 2.2 2100 10.3 16.9 2a) i) 2100 9.2 21.3 3
Av. 439910209 1022 3.8 2. Av. 6209 1255 8.9 23S: 2 Av. 5.4 21.4 3.6 sli
June June June
0300 To leS6e 15.6 ae) 0300 6.9 19.1 4.0 0300 6.4 20.9 2.6 eal
0900 zal S22 15.55 (1021 pbeat 0900 258) 1Se7. 12.1 sheet 0900 10.3 17.4 eet 0.2
1200 1.0 CRS 13.2 ew 0.4 1200 1.3 8.8 1232. Tels 76 1200 6.4 21.0 se 4
1500 3 TO 13.1 8-2 1.4 1500 1.3 ese] abbey) ere 1.4 1500 6.4 20.7 2.6 3
1800 +7 Oe 13.0 yenal abee 1800 2.7 10.7 2 4.4 1.0 1800 10.0 alate 2.1
2100 1.4 12.6 13.3 2.6 -1 2100 9.8 14.8 4.6 -8 2100 220 119532 =) 10.0" 4
Av. 22 3.2 11.4 10.6 eat 5 Av. 122 6.2 10.0 8.5 3.6 5 Av ed 12.2 14.9 1.6 32
July July July
0300 6.4 22.5 2a 0300 2.0 19.2 9.8 0300 26 ele 7.3
0900 1.0 14.0 pike ee 2.9 0900 253 10.2 U5eT 2.8 0900 9 24.0 te) Af
1200 =2: 8.8 13.0 7.8 1.2 1200 ml 5.8 14.1 8.4 2.0 1200 EEO Crake) 8.4 ac
1500 =e 6.2 13.0 9:0 2.6 1500 -6 6.0 12.4 8.4 3.6 1500 Bie 20.5 9.4 «4
1800 fy 7.0 13.0 8.6 ene 1800 ee twill 13.8 6.0 2.3 1800 lal 23.2 6.7
2100 -6 13.1 13.4 3.9 2100 4.1 18.4 29) -6 2100 7.8 22.8 4
| Av. TFA VALO SLs 5.4 1.0 Av. aS. 4.7 9.6 10.7 4.4 13 ae AN 4 5.3 20.0 Sidi “2
August August August
0300 1.4 11.0 18.1 75 0300 4.7 20.1 5.3 0300 2.1 16.1 12.2 76
0900 5.0 20.6 5.4 0900 mae cae 17.8 87.9 el 0900 -8 24.5 Diet
1200 2.2 16.2 1152 1.4 1200 Led Love 14.1 5.6 1200 Be 21.5 952 Sak
1500 1.4 13.2 13.9 2.4 ok 1500 12 8.8 13.8 6.2 220 1500 ELH fi 8.2 1
1800 No) V5oe 9 114 2.4 1800 3.0 14.3 9.4 3.9 4 1800 -2 26.8 4,0
2100 al 3.4 21.9 5.5 eal 2100 cf 11.0 16.4 2.9 2100 BC} 9.4 21.0 4
Av. 2 4.2 17.6 8.0 1.0 Av. ee) 6.8 eee 8.2 2.56 2 Av. 4 4.4 215 4.7
ILITAMNA KOTZEBUE LAKE MINCHUMINA
Time Time Time
of Temperature, degrees F. of Temperature, degrees F. of Temperature, degrees F.
day 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-29 70-79 80-89 day 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 day 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89
April April . April
0300 14.6 0300 2.8 0300 6.9 '0.6
0900 16.9 5.0 (ojeae 0900 «44.4 0900 11.8 3.8 0.8
1200 14.6 10.2 Buf 1200 (Jen 0.1 1200 11.4 9.4 V2 0.3
1500 15.6 9.6 oT 1500 jar al 1500 10.3 10.4 2.2 4
1800 18.4 56. mae 1800 6.9 1800 12.1 8.0 1.5 3
2100 18.3 4 2100 4.3 2100 13.8 2.9 of
Av. 16.4 iak 3 Av. 579) Av. 11.0: 5.8 lee 22
May May May
0300 23.0 5.6 0300 16.6 1.4 0300 14.4 nny} 2.0,
0900 Meyh) 19.3 Gat O-L 0900 16.0 5.9 Wad: 0-1 0900 3.4 16.9 10.8 2.0
1200 4.0 17.1 9.4 4 1200 15.1 8.4 1.0 +3 1200 «2.0 8.8 14.2 5.4 0.3
1500 Say, 16.9 9.3 alexa} 1500 15.8 9.0 ihe 1 1500 1.8 7.8 14.7 6.0 ot
1800 6.6 19.3 4.8 3 1800 16.9 Ted: “6 1 1800 216: 10.1 13.8 4.0 4
CLOOLE LT 1258 eile 2100 (17.7 3.4 =e 2100 4.2 15.8 8.9 aE) ol
Avewa LO. Ano .2 4.6 73 Av. 16.4 5.9 af ee Av Cs as bs BP a Wo) 3.0 22
June June June
0300 4.2 23.5 2.0 13 0300 11.7 13.2 4,2 ae 0300 1.3 14.1 13.0 6
: 0900 °o 21.9 14.6 2.8 0.4 0900 9.3 12.6 6.3 are 0.4 0900 2.6 13.4 11.3 Hb
1200 7.4 16.2 5.1 270 0.3 1200 7.1 12.8 8.0 1.8 +3 1200 1.2 G2) LS 6.6 0.3
1500 7.1 13.8 6.8 2.0 -3 1500 5.3 12.3 10.0 Yap 3 1500 1.0 6.7 15.1 1.0 2
1800 1 Syn Sek) 5.1 1.6 2° 1800. 6.7 11.5 oot, Penk 1800 a9) 9°89 «2825 bint ne
2100 wo LTS 99. D7 73 2100! 8.7). V7. 8.3 1.3 2100 3.9 16.0 8.7 hea
Av. SB MgLAS9" 116 3.6 9 12 AV. 8.1 12.3 18 1.4 2 Av. 72 4.0 11.2 10.6 3.9 a
July July July
0300 18.3 Ab 0300 1.0 12.0 16.7 USS 0300 ak 8.2 20.5 252
0900 251 20.6 7.4 3 0900 -3 10.6 14.9 4.6 ak} 0900 8 1229 12:39 4.3 el
1200 Let 15-5 nb hy) 2.8 1200 6.4 16.6 tod -8 0.1 1200 6 8.3 13,1 Tad 1.9
1500 1S. 14.5 11.0 3.9 -3 1500 5.6 15.3 8.4 eet! 1500 3 6.3 13.0 8.4 3.0
1800 nis) nly et) 8.2 3.3 1800 an Gre. 15.5 8.3 oS} 1800 3 8.4 1257 Tid 1.8
2100 6.0 21.1 3.9 2100 2 7.9 17.8 5.0 al 2100 Dee LOB Le ick
Av. 5.3 alr é-Le) Geo) nay A -l Av. ee) (Jha) 16.1 5.8 ae Av. ARE) 1270 10.8 5.1 Lez
August August August
0300 .6 1250 18.3 0300 BlEAE 15.6 13.6 eae 0300 1.3 13.6 15.4 at
0900 Pe eee 5.0 ail 0900 oe 928° 18.2 2.8 0900 4.4 18.2 8.0 4
1200 6 18.4 11.0 7.0; 1200 8.2 18.7 3.8 3 1200 ae. 13.3 aebarh 3.4
1500 A nly (yd 11.6 Lat -1 1500 6.6 19.4 4.6 4 1500 13 11.5 13.3 4.6 +3
1800 a 219 Tae 8 1800 ae 7.3 20.0 3.4 2 1800 258 16.1 10.3 Bint pak
2100 ol 5.6 24.0 1.3 2100 4 ps ALS} 18.0 8 2100 2 6.6 18.0 6.2
Av. a of +) 20.6 6.0 6 Av 4 9.9 18.0 2.6 1 Av. 3 5.0 15.4 8.4 1.8 oe
115
Table 25.--Air temperature by hour of day, and number of deys per month in each temperature cless--Continued
(Av._1950-58)
McGRATH
Time
of Tempsrature, degrees F. Tempsreturs, degress F. Temperature, degrees F.
dey 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 dey 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 60-89 "950-59 60-69 70-79 0-89
April April April
0300 0.4 rin ee) 0-2 ONT: a
0300 4.8 0.3 13.9 Ce 0.1 14.8 9 0.7
1200 11.0 9 0.1 11.6 11.2 2.0 11.8 < 1.6 0.6
1500 13.1 -6 -6 11.0 12.0 2n5, 0.2 12.0 -4 2.0 4
1600 10.3 6 3 13.0 10.6 oe) 14.2 8 oi) oe)
2100 2.7 2 16.3 3.0 ait 20.0 «4 .2
7.0 aul He 12.9 7.5 a9 10.9 -0 ee) 22
Mey Mey
9 8 -0 500 17.2 6.6
° at 8 8) 5.0 0200 2.9 tel 9 1
oa 5 0.3 4 7 12.8 aheid 1200 1.3 8.4 ak 5
9 9, -6 2 ff 11.9 ene 1500 ulext 8.2 1 5
2 6.1 -3 .4 ti 9.0 -2 1800 2.8 11.2 9 o
2 LB -6 9 9 1.0 2100 Wet 16.5 6
74 10.4 3.7 22 -4 7 6.6 Bt/ Av. 5.8 10-5 3 a)
June June June
Si 16.4 959. -6 0300 Cr 3.0 cit 0300 1.8 17.8 10.1 3
3.2 14.1 11.4 1.3 0900 -6 2525 2.4 0-5 0900 me 2.35 10.9 14.3 ere 0.1
ae: 10.1 a259 5.5 0.6 1200 15.3 tine 1.6 0.2 1200 1.8 6.9 13.5 tee -6
ot SA oes 7.4 1.2 1500 14.5 9.1 sil -6 1500 6 eOr S29 6.9 -6
2 9.4 12.5 5.9 1.0 1800 15.35 6.2 1.3 35 2800 9 10.6 12.6 4.6 -3
i 15.2 10.3 i 2100 1.0 13.3 1.3 -5 100 oil 8 17.6 6.5 we
-5 4.3 3 9.9 3.5 5 7 ee 12.8 4.4 a) o2, 3 2) 10.5 10.2 3.5 -3
Jul July guly
0300 6 10.8 18. Eo 0300 as ig. 11.6 aE 4 16.3
0900 4.2 19 1 os00 3.2 21.8 Beg i) 10.2
1200 -5 8.35 4 6 i) 1200 1.0 14.0 13.1 CIB xe 5.8
1500 7.8 3 8.1 2.8 1500 -8 12.3 12.6 4.1 ae 5.3
1800 3 8.3 5 6.6 2.35 1800 1.4 15.8 10.4 3.3 al 9.0
2100 1.2 15.8 at 2.4 She 21 4.2 18.8
1 2.8 13.0 -8 4.2 ata 5.2 16.1 Ted aT -3 oul 10.9
Au August ee ey ee Es ee es
0300 oUF Bef 14, -6 0300 -3 12.3 17.7 at 0300 5.1 8.1 x Sal
os00 -0 20. 5.8 0300 1.9 23.8 3.2 = 0900 Je 5.1 a 8.8 as
1200 -2 15. 11.2 2.7 1200 ve 17.0 11.7 alary 1200 2.4 6 14.9 a5
1500 10) 12 13.3 ergal 2 1500 4 14.8 Te) 2.8 1 1500 1.8 1 12.4 6 2
1800 =) 15.0 BET, 2.3 L 1800 6 19.8 9.4 ee 1800 Ace -3 10.0 Shy aa}
2100 oe = 20.6 4.0 2100 det 23.2 eit 2100 peel 12.4 6 2.9
Av. 5 -8 16.3 7.8 1.5 i Av. aL 3.4 19.5 7.1 = Av. asa fale 1 8.2 2.8 oul
smact TANANA UNALAKLEET
Tine Time 2 Time 7
of Temperature, degrees F. of Temperatures, degrees F. of Tempsreture, degrees F.
dey 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 day 30-39 40-49° 50-59 60-69 70-79 60-89
April April
0.1 030 4.2 0-6 0500 «7.6 0-4
1.6 0800 10.3 4.0 0.8 0900 11.2 2.3
4.0 0.35 1200 10.4 7.6 2.0 0.3 1200 12.4 4.4 0.2
4.4 -3 1500 9.6 8.8 CBU oil 1500 12.4 4.9 =e
2.3 al 1800 12.2 5.7 1.4 2 1800 11.7 mae)
a) 2100 10.4 2.0 ‘3 2100 10.3 -6
rel eat AV. 9:5 4.8 aley-3 Ee Av. 10.9 2.6 eal
=
Mey Mey May y
-0 :) 0300 14.8 9.9 +5 0300 16.9 7.6 za
-2 1259 3.4 0.1 03900 4.1 10.1 TS) 2.8 0900 9.8 mS) 5.3 0.9
O 14.9 at a, 2200 2.3 fall” S28: 7.4 0-8 1200 8.1 13.7 5.7 GE)
6 13.7 7.4 Sth 0.1 1500 eal 6.2 1229 8.3 a. Onl: 1500 9.0 11.8 6.8 BICLe 0.2
1800 10.0 14.2 5.2 a4 alt 1800 2.1 Hien 13.3 6.3 8 1800 10.1 11.0 7.0 9
2100 17.7 8.9 2100 6.3 13.1 8.9 el 2100 14.2 10.7 2.6
Av. 13.2 10.9 3.6 3 Av. 5.3 9.0 10.2 4.3 4 Av. 11.4 11.3 4.6 &)
June June June
0300 10.0 18.35 1.7 0300 3.1 14.5 11.2 aed mall! 0300 4.9 18.0 7.0 ape
rey ashi eaulys 4.6 .3 0900 Usa 1222. 13:0 3.4 0900 1.6 8.8 15.6 3.6 x) 0.2
oil 4 12.2 Tet, ait 1200 otf 7.0 1229 8.6 =8) 3200) qake 6.9 15.6 4.4 8 on! '
+4 6.3 12.3 8.3 2.7 1500 as) 4.8 13.4 9.2 225, Y1500) #2 6.9 15.6 5.0 1.2 oul :
at 9.0 11.8 Ligh 1.4 1800 wt 6.4 14.8 re! 1.0 1800 1.8 7.2 16.3 3.6 1.0 1
O29 SEB ELOSS: 2.3 ol 2100 5.0 14.4 10.8 1.8 2100 2.2 10.5 16.0 1.4 ou
2.6 ase Ost 5.0 real Av. a) 3.5 9.3°" 12:0= 5.0 ale egw 2.2 9.7 14.4 3.0 -6 aul
¥ July July 4
0300 2.0 22.7 aS 0300 1.7 12.9 15.1 1.3 0300 if) 10°65) 1859 -8
0900 9.2 -5 6.3 3 0900 Of On et As9 4.3 -1 0900 2.2 18.3 D5 x) g
1200 4.6 5 8.8 3.1 1200 4 5.9 13.1 9.8 1.8 1200 1.2 17.6 10.4 1.8
1500 3.6 1 10.2 4.1 0.1 1500 pel 5.0 135.1 10.0 2.8 1500 WO) AG7 Aen 1.2 ,
1800 5.1 8 7.8 3.3 1800 -3 5.8 13.9 9.0 2.0 1800 1.5 19.6 9.1 1.0
2100 1 PAT: 1 4.1 2100 ghee sees G7/ 2.3 2100 2.8 23.5 4.7
Av. 3 9.5 2 6.2 1.8 Av. a) 2.6 9.4 11.7 5.9 atcal Av. ote 3.2 19.3 7.6 8
Augus® August August }
0300 5.7 21.7 3.6 0300 3.9 14.9 10.8 arf 0300 1.3 13.1 16.3 -3
0300 wt DANG e Set 0300 +2 5.0 16.2 9.6 0300 4.0 23.9 3.0 ol
1200 +4 7.3 16.9 ~9 1200 ol 1.6 12.3 13.3 3.7 2200 2.3 21.3 6.8 -6
1500 eS 6.9 16.8 1.6 1500 1.5 21.2 15.0 5.2 -5 1500 21 2182 7.0 -6 ot
1800 .6 9.8 15.8 34 1800 2.4 13.9 12.0 Sit 1800 2.8 23.1 4.7 4
2100F 125. 2 18t3_ 028 2100 1.1 Cae! 4.3 2100 -6 Meommeond 1.1
Av a EE eee bee Ee Pe) -5 Av. 9 5.6 13.6 8.8 259) -1 AV. -3 5.3 21.3 3.8 5
1/ Tempereture frequencies below 30° F. were not compiled. All stations in April and Mey, and Kotzebue in June had temperatures
below 30° F.
Source: United States Weather Bureau coded date.
116
Table 24.--Normal relative humidity according to time of day
Percent relative humidity
Station April May June July August
0200 0800 1400 2000 0200 0800 1400 2000 0200 0800 1400 2000 0200 0800 1400 2000 0200 0800 1400 2000
Galena 70 72 62 68 tae 65 51 58 76 64 49 54 82 73 59 64 85 82 65 75
Northway 78 62 49 68 81 55 43 61 83 60 48 61 87 67 50 66 89 71 52 75
McGrath 77 70 55 66 82 66 49 60 84 67 50 59 88 75 57 66 92 86 66 as)
Fairbanks 74 63 47 61 tT 57 42 55 82 62 45 57 88 70 52 66 91 78 57 Giri
Anchorage 75 67 53 67 77 64 50 63 75 68 57 65 85 74 62 72 86 78 65 he
Naknek 1/ 86 80 64 78 86 73 58 75 88 78 59 T2 on 82 60 75 92 86 64 81
Bethel 87 84 74 83 89 r9 64 74 90 80 64 70 93 87 69 Tele 96 93 aA 87
SSS eee
1/ 3 years of data only
Source: United States Weather Bureau. Local climatological data, Alaska, 1958.
117
Table 25.--Relative humidity percent by hour of dey, and number of days in each temperature cless
(av. 1950-58)
ANCHORAGS BETHEL BETTLES
a Relative humidity percent are Relative humidity percent pana Relative humidity percent
day 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50 day 10-19 20-29 3-39 40-49 50/ day 10-19 20-29 3-39 40-49 50
April April April
0300 O22 1.3 28.6 0300 30.0 0300 0-2 0.2 29.7
0900 +2 1.2 5.0 23.7 0900 tats EE) 03900 od, 2-9 eI.O,
1200 +2 3.2 9.3 17.3 1200 0.2 ee) 12857, 2200 A) 4.2 24.9
1500 6 4.3 320) 26-0 1500 eek ae oereuert) 1500 -7 4.8 24.5
1800 ae 2.2 6.1 21.5 1800 sO ore 1800 =a 3.4 26.5
2100 0.1 of 1.8 27.4 2100 30.0 2100 el =6 29.3
Av. 2 19 5.4, 22.5 Av. -6 29.4 Av. -3 eatneod 0)
May May May
0300 Et ip He 0300 31.0 0300 0.2 -5 30.7
0900 2 1.6 6.3 22.9 0900 onl -7 3.2 0900 6 5.2) 125.2
1200 6 4.7 11.6 214.1 31200 0.2 8 4.4 25.6 1200 2 3.4 6.8 20.6
1500 va 6.7 10.2 23.0 2500 x) 1.8 4.8 24.1 2500 8 3.6 7.4 19.2
1800 sth 2.6 8.3 19.4 1600 0.2 el 8 3.4 26.6 1600 -7 3.4 6.9 20.0
2100 eek -6 2.9) eTes 2100 1 oul <7 30.2 2100 Pt) 3.9 26.2
Av. 4 By Simoes Av. on 26 2.3 28.0 Av. a) 2.0 5.20 23.6
June June June
0300 3 2ou7 0300 eee 29.9 0500 4 29.6
0900 3 2.6) Tet 0900 -6 29.4 0900 ot a Dede eesS
1200 ot 2E 5.6: 22-9 1200 1.3 2.4 26.3 1200 x 5.1 8.2 16.6
1500 -6 1.6 8.4 19.4 1500 4 1.6 4.4 23.6 1500 1.8 6.2 6.4 15.6
1800 1.6 6.4 22.0 2800 .2 8 4.1 24.9 1800 2.2 4.7 5.60" 27-5
2100 -3 2.4 28.3 2100 -6 29,4 2100 .3 2.8 2.8 25.12
Av. = 8 4.1 24.9 Av. aa -6 AS eae 3 Av. 8 3.3 Ey SS
July July July
0300 31.0 0300 31.0 03500 wt 30.9
0900 diet 1 seoss 0900 ea. S059. 0900 T.8) 29.2
1200 4 4.6 26.0 1200 oa 2.3 28.6 1200 2.8 6.9 21.2
1500 ae +x) 5.3 24.6 1500 8 3.6 26.6 1500 4.6 6.3 19.0
1800 8 4.2" 2652) 1800 8 2.8 27.4 1800 3.9 6.0 20.2
2100 -6 30 2100 2. 30.9 2100 7 2.3 29.0
Av. Ce leS AV. -3 nSS ier ooc) Av. 2.0 3.7 «24.9
August August
0300 5 Re) 0300 31.0
0900 8 30.2 0900 31.0 0900 ot 30.9
2200 4 ART te AS!) 2200 -2 30.8 2200 -5 2.0 28.7
1500 cel ot 4.0 26.2 1500 mae -6 30.3 1500 -6 4.0 26.4
1800 <2 2.6 28.2 1800 ort -7 30.2 1800 -8 TI) eS)
2100 3 30.7 2100 31.0 2100 31.0
Av. =o ce) Av. SS ErCOlT, Av. .3 aeeimegeo
EIG DELTA FATREANKS Fr. YUXON
Be Reletive humidity percent Bre Relative humidity rat Relative humidity percent
day 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50/ day 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50 day 10-19 20-29 40-49 507
April April
0300 O21 0.9 29.0 0300 0.2 O=tipaekee 0500- 0.4 28.5
0900 0.2 2.0 Tet, 20: 0900 0.2 2.4 6.23 eine 0900 4.35 25.6
1200 O21 1.6 4.1 8.7 15.5 1200 i.e 4.3 9.7 14.8 1200 627, 2259.
1500 1.6 4.9 8.7 14.8 1500 2.3 6.1 8.8 12.8 1500 6.9 20.2
1800 ae 2.8 5.9) 2723) 1600 of 4.3 8.9 16.1 1800
2100 -4 Dede Oe) 2100 4 3.2 26.3 2100 2.0 26.6
Av. 6 2.4 5.8 2is2 Av. aie 2.9 6.5 20.1 Av. 4.1 24.6
Mey Mey Mey
0500 ERE 8 Azo, 28.2 0300 1.0 30.0 0300 ad. oz 1.4 29.4
0900 1.4 Gon 8.7 13.2 0900 6 7.0 8.7 14.6 0s00 -3 2.2 7.9 20.6
1200 ant 3.9 929 320) 8.1 1200 0.3 5.0 8.4 8.4 8.8 1200 6 5.2 10.6 14.7
1500 cae 4.2 10.9 hoe 8.6 1500 -4 6.35 10.3 7.3 6.6 1500 2-3 6.8 10.2 12-8
1600 2.3 8.5 6.9 13.3 1600 ii 3.7 8.8 9.4 6.4 1800 Data missin;
2100 1.8 fe6i. 321.6 2100 -6 2.0 5.7 25.8 2100 -2 714) 5.8
Av. 2.0 6.4 7.1L 15.5 AV. aa 2a 529 6.8 15.4 Av. -5 3.2 7.2
June June 7 June
0300 at -3 aL Byers 0300 -5 =9pi28.8 0300 axl z 24.9
0900 BE) 4.3 Ted SUTST os00 od: -6 3.7 7.2 18.5 0900 Be! 3 17.6
1200 el 2.7 6.8 8.9 25, 1200 sul 2.9. T.7 8.7 10.6 2200 < 6 13.2
1500 ade 4.1 6.8 728) ade 1500 ef 4.4 7.9 8.1 8.9 1500 2.0 6 10.3
1800 ae etl 5.8 7.6 14.1 1800 -4 3.0 2 729) 2455 2800 Data mis
2100 “1 2.0 5.3 22.6 2100 Zit) 4.4 23.7 2100 a) 2 20.7
Av. ed 1.7 4.3 6.4 17.5 Av. -2 1.8 4.8 6:2 720 Av. 4 4 17.3
July July July
0300 al 2 eer eosn 0300 31 0300 2) 1.30 29.5
0900 ut 1.6 6.6 22.7 0900 ot 1.2 4.0 25 0900 @ 2.2 8.2 20.4
1200 a6: 5.2 8.3 15.9 1200 UT 5.2 WO} faz, 2200 -6 3.3 22.0 15.1
1500 oi 2.2 6.7 7.7 14.3 1500 .3 3.2 6.0 6.3 15 1500 Ey 4.9 10.7 14.7
1800 ) 5.4 7.2 AGS 1800 2.2 Sse 7.0 16 2800 in,
21200 =e 1.4 3.0 26.4 2100 -6 alte) 2200 2.2 By fa AY /
Av. 8 S.4 Sotsepedied Av. ot ane, 3.0 4.2 22.5 Av. 2.5 7.6 20.5
August Augus? Auguss
5 et 1.4 29.5 0300 0500 2 «630.8
of 4.4 25.9 0900 od a2 0300 otf 2.6) 27.7,
-3 4.2 8.0 18.5 2200 6 Sa 6.7 1200 cal 9 8.7 21.3
+4 5.3 iy Ak 8 2) 1500 a) 5.6 6.9 1500 = ris) 8.9 20.0
a) 2.2 6.67 peis9 1800 1.4 6.2 1800 ta missing
Ate 2.8 27.5 2100 2100 3 2.8\__ 28.9
Av. 2 2.2 5.3 23.3 Av. a} 1.5 Av. 8 4.4 25.7
118
Table 25 ,--Relative humidity percent by hour of dey, and number of days in each temperature class-~-Continued
(Av. 1950-58)
GALENA GULKANA HOMER
one Relative humidity percent pie Relative humidity percent eee Relative humidity percent
day 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50/ day 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 507 day 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50
April April April
0300 30.0 0300 0.2 O.1 29.7 0300 0.2 0.4 29,4
0900 Q-9) 8e9cL 0900 ol 3.9 2650 0900 0.1 +6 1.3 28.0
1200 0.2 0.4 4.2 Cone 1200 0.1 2.6 9.4 17.9 1200 rr) 1.7 28.0
1500 2 1.4 Aol | BEC 1500 6 3.2 10.0 16.2 1500 8 2.4 26.8
1800 cee $.7 25.1 1800 2 Pt) 6.1 22.8 1800 oe aie) Lid 283
2100 cist 6 29,3 2100 ol «3 290 2100 0.1 +8 29.1
Av. ods a) a eta Av. 2 De 5.0 23.6 Av. 4 Ys WebNS
Mey May Mey
0300 1.0 30.0 0300 ile me 30.8 0300 ok 30.9
0900 8 rapat 6.0 Cenk 0900 o.1l ott 19 9.0 19.3 0900 ol 6 30.3
1200 0,1 ates) 6.7 Hed 15.3 1200 +2 2.6 7.0 TS. 13.3 1200 1.4 29.6
1500 74 2.9 6.9 7.0 23.8: 1500 =< 3.8 8.0 Ti 1L.F 1500 el ol 1.0 29.8
1800 3 2.6 5.6 Tee) 14.6 1800 se 1.4 4.9 7.38 Ue. 1800 6 30.4
2100 4 3.3 6.2 21.2 2100 4 2.4 28.2 2100 al 30.9
Av. ol 1.4 4.1 5.9 19.5 Av. aul 1.4 Sar, 5.7 20.4 Av. 6 30.4
June June June
0300 23 2907 0300 eae 29.9 0300 30.0
0900 4 1.6 4.3 23.7 0900 2 2.6 8.3 18.9 0900 al 29.9
1200 alt v8 4.2 9.1 14.8 1200 +2 3.4 7.4 8.7 10.3 1200 ol ot 29755)
1500 4 Ce) 4.8 8.1 13.8 1500 ah 4.8 8.2 6.6 955 1500 el ol ad eA)
1800 2 ad. 4.9 6.8 15.2 1800 +3 3.2 5.4 8.4 abe sy f 1800 -4 29.6
2100 ata l oe Sate 22.0 2100 ol 1.4 4.6 23.9 2100 30.0
Av. ol T25 cine 5.4. SL9N9, Av. “2 2.0) 4.2 6a LT Av. 7 12 29.8
July July July
0300 31.0 0300 31.0 0300 31.0
0900 25 2.8 OT 0900 269? 229.7) 0900 ol 30.9
1200 4 2.6 7.4 20.6 1200 29. 4.8 8.3 17.0 1200 +2 30.8
1500 ney) 4.9 7.4 L755! 1500 aE 2.3 6.7 8.3 13.6 1500 a) 2 30.6
1800 6 5.2 6.4 18.8 1800 Bae 4,4 6.6 17.8 1800 2 50.8
2100 -6 eae, 28.2 2100 +3 2x6. 28 2100 31.0
Av. 4 2.3 4.4 23, Av ee) 2.7 4.6 22.8 Av. ol al 30.8
August August August
0300 31.0 0300 31.0 0300 31.0
0900 -8 30.2 0900 15 9ee 291: 0900 ‘ al 30.9
1200 oi 1.0 2.8 27.1 1200 4 oe 6.1 eons, 1200 3 30.7
1500 4 Eear 2.8 25.9 1500 9 4.6 8.1 17.4 1500 12 +2 50.6
1800 aah 12 2.4 27.3 1800 9 2.3 4.1 23.7 1800 +1 30.9
2100 +9 30.1 2100 sol SOT. 2100 31.0
Av. a Hy 1.6 28.6 Av 4 as 3.4 25.7 Av al +1 50.8
ILTAMNA KOTZEBUE LAKE MINCHUMINA
nae Relative humidity percent pate Relative humidity percent eos Relative humidity percent
day 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 507 day 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50 day 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50/
April April April
0300 (Ober 29.9 0300 0.1 Oud 29.8 0300 0.2 0.4 29.4
0900 0.2 On COs 0900 aids eo29 0900 Ova: me 2.) eT.0
1200 «2 nee l 28.7 1200 30.0 1200 6 ret 5.9 21.4
1500 ak 1.1 28.8 1500 0.2 +4 29,4 1500 +6 3.3 5.9: 20,52
1800 Hel 29.8 1800 cal el 29.8 1800 2 2.0 7.4 20.4
2100 ok 29.9 2100 30.0 2100 8 3.2 26.0
Av. ml -5 29.4 Av. ra ol 29.8 Av ace 1.4 4.2 24.0
May May May
0300 31.0 0300 31.0 0300 eae fc} 30.0
03900 Fk) 30.4 0900 eel ff 30.2 0900 Fi} 1.4 0 22.38
1200 QoL eels abe} 29.0 1200 <2 8 30.0 1200 1.4 6.2 + 8.8 14.6
1500 0.1 ee -8 ee 28.8 1500 ol 1.0: 29.9 1500 3.4 4.4 10.0 13.2
1800 31, 12 alo} 29.7 1800 ni 30.9 1800 Oe 1.3 4.6 talpal 16.8
2100 3 30.7 2100 31.0 2100 i) 1.6 6.2 Cea.
Av. Bal -2 8 TRE) Av. wl A 30.5 Av. ea 3.1 6.8 20.0
June 5 June Juns
0300 al 299 0300 30.0 0300 is 8.4
0900 ol ne eat 0900 4 6 29.0 03900 1.4 6.3 22.3
1200 od ene aly 15159) 1200 a0. t 29.20 1200 2.0 5.8 8.1 14,1
1500 elt Epa 3.9 24.9 1500 1 ar) A 292 1500 nl 2.3 T.8 6.3 13.5
1800 oe no 2.4 26.5 1800 ade 36) 129.3 1800 -9 4.7 Ted aly (sa
2100 me of. 29.0 2100 On eS ST 2100 cab 1.3 4.4 24,2
Av. eal oa) 1.4 28.0 Av 2 4 29.4 Av. ae) 3.5 5.7 1959
July July July
0300 31.0 0300 31.0 0300 +3 30.7
0900 ot 30.3 0900 31.0 0900 ral oe 2.8 27.4
1200 3 ie Olmme oss 1200 8 30.2 1200 A 3.4 6.9. 2159
1500 pe ale 2.6 PHOT 1500 1 29 30.0 1500 1.2 5.4 6.7 TSS
1800 ohh aa) 28.1 1800 a) 30.7 1800 3 4.8 5.6 20.3
2100 aa: 30.9 2100 al 30.9 2100 8 i eee
Av. 3 2 29.5 Av. 4 30.6 Av. 3 2.5 4.0 24.2
August August August
0300 31.0 0300 31.0 0300 31.0
0900 pe 30.9 0900 2 30.8 0900 oT 30.3
1200 nae Ae) 30.0 1200 od iC 30.7 1200 a Seo et.o
1500 ee Toe oT6 1500 ol a 30.8 1500 ail 9 4,4 25.6
1800 1 6 30.3 1800 23 30.7 1800 1 2.6 28.3
2100 al 30.9 2100 31.0 2100 we 30.8
Av. oi 30.5 Av. al 30.9 Av. 2 1.9) (28.39
119
in eech tempsreture cless--Continusd
Table 25 .--Reletive humidity percent by hour of dey, end number of days
(Av. 1950-58)
McGRS
a Reletive humidity percent = Reletive humidity percent : Relative humidity percent
dey 10-19 20-29 30-39 «40-49 50 dey 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 sO/ dey 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 507
April April April
0300 0.2 29.9 030) 30.0 0300 0.2 0-2 29.6
0300 eee reel, os0o 0.6 29.4 os00 «0.2 0.2 pala 4.3 23.3
1200 2.6 6.6 20.6 1200 0.9 2.4 26.7 1200 real 3.9 Eleil 15.9
1500 3.2 8.2 18.3 1500 0.2 akan 2.3 26.5 1500 ai isa 4.6 10.2 14,2
1800 oul Lr, 7.3 20.9 1800 o2 1.7 28:2 1800 Sil 3 reid 5.1 22.4
2100 et pom Ne OT 2100 30.0 2100 al! 1.3. 28.6
Av. a2 1.3 AY 2455 Av 4 aOR Te ve aul a oe) 5. 0meera
Mey Mey May
0300 -3 30:7 0500 31.0 0300 a pil 8
03900 3 1.6 7.4 21.7 03900 oll 1.4 29.5 0300 dat -9 6.3 8.1 6
1200 0.2 1.4 6.1 8.3 15.0 1200 4 1.3 5.3 24.0 2200 “4 3.8 6.4 7.0 4
1500 3 2.5 TT. 32 11.5 1500 <2 thestl 5.35 24.4 1500 a) 4.9 8.3 6.7 8
1800 pal 2.6 5.8 7.6 14.9 1200 2 4 3.0 27.4 1600 ue) 1.8 5.8 7.4 &
2200 oH) 1.4 453. 25.1 2100 31.0 2100 ol! -5 1.9 Uf
Av. 2 Leal 3.6 6.2 19.8 Av. 2 29 2.5 27.9 Av. 2 Als) 4.9 5.2 8
June June June
0300 30.0 03500 Bist 28) 0300 30.0
os00 bal 1.6 SiG) “227. 000 che egy 0300 -6 3.2 920 Ree,
1200 1.4 5.3 82 15.2 1200 oul 1.6 3.2 25.2 1200 at at) 8.6 7.6 11.8
1500 1 2.8 7.0 6.8 13.5 1560 -6 9 5.6 ang. 1500 os) 2.1 8.3 7.6 11.7
1800 oh 2.3 5.8 5.4 16.4 1800 2 alae 2.4 26.3 1800 sil om 6.5 6.8 15-9
2200 -2 1.9 3.4 24.5 2100 oil 2929 2100 4 2) 26.7
Ave ay 3.6 4.9 20.4 Av. 2 8 2.0 27.0 Av. pak Eo) 4.5 5.6 1879
July Juiy July
0300 31.0 0300 31.0 03500 ()
os00 255.) 228.7, 0900 30.8 0300 ee eG 7
1200 ol 6.2 21.3 1200 9 27.0 1200 1.4 5.7 6
1500 1.0 6.8 18.9 12500 a 1.4 25.0 1500 «tl 2.1 6.2 7
1800 -8 4.7 21.4 180 ae 28.6 1800 out 1.2 3.8 Tf
2100 real 28.3 2200 31.0 “2 2
Av. -5 3.7 25.0 Av. -4 ey SEI -8 2.9 9
August August August
0300 31.0 0300 31.0 0300 31.0
os00 -4 30.6 osoo 32.0 000 1 3.4 27.5
1200 aif Ane} 27.4 1200 3 1.2 29.5 1200 -6 3.0 9.8 17.6
1500 bal aa, 4.0 25.2 1500 ol 3 2.3 26.5 1500 -8 4.5 9.4 16.3
1800 au 4 2e8. 2OTeT: 1600 -6 30.4 1800 oul, aad Ghee aor:
2100 el 30.9 2100 31.0 2100 31.0
Av. -5 1.7 28.8 Av. el SU) 30.2 Av. a2 1.5 4.7 24.6
sect TANANA UNALAKLSET
Time a sae os Tine = aie Tine 5 ArH
ae Relative humidity percent of Relative humidity percent of Relative humidity percent
dey 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 507 dey 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 507 dey 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 507
April Ap April
0500 29.9 0300 1.0 28.7 0300 0.3 IST
0900 0.5 28.3 0900 2.8 26.8 os00 0-5 2.4 28.3
120) at 25.9 2200 0.1 eyed 23.3 1200 -6 1.35 26.1
1500 0-4 1.2 24.0 1500 aa 5.9 21.9 2500 4 ot) 28.7
1600 2 27.7 1800 3.9 25.0 1800 8 29.2
210 -35 2950 2100 1.6 28.4 2100 me 29.8
Av. eae 4 27.6 Av. ale 78 Seas Av. on Sommrcos0
Ney May Mey.
0300 2 30.8 030 9 i 0300 oul of 30.6
ogo 4 1.3 3.3 26.0 0900 at 3.2 6.2 g 0900 1.4 2.4 26.8
1200 gl hh Lt 4.8 253.7 1200 2.7 4.8 10.6 9 1200 0-2 1.2 S.1 (26.2
1500 a 4 3.0 5.6 22.1 1500 3 3.2 20. 8.2 -3 1500 1.9 2.2 26.3
1800 24 2.4 4.2 24.0 1800 a) 252 4.6 8.7 ne. 1800 1.0 2.4 27.0
2100 a eA 29%5 2100 el ue 4.2 -6 2100 1.2 29.8
Av. 75 1.4 3.3 26.0 Av. ae 1.5 3.4 6.5 5 Av. 5 a 2:0 27.8
June June June
0300 30.0 0300 ol! ae 29.7 0300 ol 29.9
os00 2 1.2 4.0 24.7 ogs00 +4 1.4 5.4 22.6 os00 6 1.2 28.2
1200 a 1.0 2.9 5.7 .20.3 2200 1.4 6.2 Teser BOs 1200 al .4 1.1L 4728.4
1500 oa! ae 2.9 6.0 19.8 1500 eat 2.9. 5.7 8.6 12.7 1500 8 yt) 25
1800 rhe 2.6 4.4 21.8 1800 ese 4.2 TL 16.5 1800 oe ae 2.200 28.5
2200 res +2 1.7 28.0 2100 a) ee 2 SBI COR: 2200 3 -4 29.3
Av. 6 1.6 Cy Aer al Av. r.2 3.1 5.3 20.4 Av. ow! 4 a9; 28.6
July July July
0300 ou 30.9 0300 31.0 0300 3120
0900 aa! 2 26 32922! 0300 2.2 28.8 0900 ne 7s 30.5
1200 5. 1.6 3.7 25.2 1200 a) 2.9 6.0 21.8 1200 oak Bey -6 30.1
1500 ot 3.7 4.1 22.5 1500 1.2 3.6 6.9 19.3 1500 oth & 30.5
1800 ati 1.8 3.4 25er: 1800 on 3.3 5.3 22.2 1800 .4 30.6
2100 TO OO at 2100 ol 2.0 29.9 2100 2 30.9
Av. .5 1.2 2.2 27.3 Av. .5 1.6 3.6 25.5 Av. eel 35 30.6
August August August
0300 31.0 0300 31.0 0300 31.0
0300 “2: 30.1 0300 30.8 0900 “2 30.8
1200 =f 3.0 27.2 1200 ate) 28.0 1200 -3 -2 30.5
1500 ol 2:9 (26:9 1500 5 1.6 24.7 1500 a) -1 30°65
1800 alent 29.2 1800 4 28.5 1800 4 30.6
2100 31.0 2100 31.0 2100: et SUES)
Av. 74 1s 29.3 Av. ol 1.4 "29.0 Av. of 30.7
Source: United States Weethsr Bureau coded deta.
120
Table 26.--Sunrise, sunset, and duration of daylight
Fort Yukon, Alaska Anchorage , Alaska Missoula, Montana
Date Time of Time of Duration of Time of Time of Duration of Time of Time of Duration of
sunrise sunset daylight sunrise sunset daylight sunrise sunset daylight
Hrs Mins Hrs Mins Hrs Mins
Apri — 1 0456 1836 13 40 0524 1843 13 #19 0616 1905 12 49
ital 0416 1911 14 55 0452 1910 14 18 0556 1919 13° 23
Al. 0335 1947 16 12 0422 1935 U5. 1S 0538 1933 13755
May 1 0255 2025 17 30 0351 2002 16 Li 0521 1946 14 25
ata 0213 2105 18 52 0323 2029 17 06 0506 1959 14 53
21 0128 2150 20 22 0258 2055 Jif gbit 0454 2012 alayealgs}
June al 0033 2252 ee 19 0236 2119 18 43 0445 2023 15 68
lak 1/SAH SAH 24 00 0222 2135 19 13 0441 2031 2:5; 350:
21 SAH SAH 24 00 0218 2143 19 -25 0441 2034 1: 5S
July al SAH SAH 24 00 0225 2140 9: 25 0444 2035 Algopemeny
11 0034 2252 22 18 0240 2127 18 47 0452 2030 15 38
21 0129 2200 20 31 0301 2107 18 06 0503 2022 a9)
Aug. al: 0216 2115 1é 59 0329 2040 ky ental 0515 2009 14 54
11 OL57 2034 17 37 0355 2012 16) Av 0528 1954 14 26
21 0333 1952 16 19 0421 1942 WB. vel. 0540 1937 2S: 57
Sept. 1 0412 1908 14 56 0448 1907 14 19 0555 1916 1S. 21:
11 0445 1828 13 43 0514 1836 13 22 0608 1857 12 49
21 0518 1748 12 30 0538 1804 12 26 0621 1836 Je 15
1/ SAH - Sun above horizon all days
Source: United States mimeographed data.
121
Wind direction (fron)
jer month in each direction class
and number of days
Wind direction (from)
(Av. 1950-58)
Table 27.--Wind direction by hour of da:
Wind direction (from)
ANCHORAGE
Time
of
Al On O rl moO
Oi] [wr wi oO oly
be NR DAUAARG
Or ada
April
Calm
7
ie}
4
of
6
oO
4
2 WO x Ohio
3 ND 19 19 0d 0d Oto
FA) e]O D 4 CY DIO
I CU 19 9 QUIto
Sted 2 tro sti
tO 0d 03 09 Oho
B] Jntormandin
iO dAA ala
Calm
4
6
8
3
3
6
3
4 th OU OI]
tA Segepneme ne eltre
HAM Ol
Yt rh OM Ir
Yala ¥ oly
April
A DO Ht Ad
aa a ol
A) lor ww + oho
ea
al el
oo00000
esessso.
C) BUH o A>
a lOOHAANS
May
0 = CY OLO
1 CU cy 19/19
KO HOO WO xO
MmMANM ANY
Am UM Oo s/o
unm +t cia
balla Ib oo)
Haoadaela
IM 2D YD XK
it td 3/6
12 AO OW w\o
at tcl
st rd QO 12 QUI
id wf his ahs
L919 af 0d 03 ea]
St QU 1 0 OJ
wd roar
ouronrnlt
A © xt xt i]t
COON ao
Hor wow lt
QOD Hc
ld al 8 Fu walt
ht OOM O|[M
Cr)
I CU oD «OP ]tO
OD Kt HD DIO
09 0d Atle
iTpoRonaln
9 3 A cd cd aif
A UOMO Ort
aa le
OOM Ht TOD
rHOOo oO who
moO Ae A Old
old ww dt tlt
Im bt « <t D]O
¥ 19 13.03 09 eafto
lo OAM t O]O
AUN NN
rake vig
lictletirctlet
M22 OOO Fi}o
AO 6D 1 09 1D HHO
lomo}
Bo
io Oo
g
uu
MONOD AY
sti ad ol cifes
Jul;
Jul
th OM MO @ 9 wlat
HO st st CU CY WO) st
MO & M9 ]00
ON AA AMIN
MOOMM rho
VAAN etd
hr OO A Ie4
aaa wlio
aor hala
bla OOK © whe
OAH wo M]I9
(Ue ie | Ca
I tM YM lao
AKON OD|n
ot wilt
WHDOD AIG
Ad a 63 09 ath
OM CY oO
noo wo olf
Fonwt alo
Cdaar ola
Odin on oho
Oa dalla
ator a wlo
UUUNA A Alo
Ravin n|a
Av.
ts) ial
aUuoonrhjo
NA A ad
IAnADMOal-4
Ast 9 0 00 Alto
~
Al
ionqao0000
egeeseo.
Hao o A>
COd AAS
August
st
tc M1 Ht CULO
to tM 9 00 ft
HO OO 9 /xH
OU AA allo
wouon alr
at
Ir onwonls
10 0 Ww Fro
Ce
t
tir Orr} > Ico.
16 wo tle
i
3
Calm
-8
OOD wo vy
AMM mm yy
W
3.8
NOM an
ht xt 10
95.2
ONWMO Or
Wind direction (from)
2.0 1.1
1.3 15.5
FT. YUKON
Time
of
Av.
5.6
Ino O HY CO
129 19.10 Or
2.1 2.5
mAAM Oly
MA A OO
2.8
Aa oon ala
KO Dh M ~ ~o]c~o
32229
May
3.0 4.6
Wind direction (from)
April
2.6 2.7
BIA)
3.6 2.2
5.1 3.3
4.8 3.8
9.7 94.2
FAIRBANKS
Time
of
da:
Av.
Av.
4.3
3.3
2.8
Calm
3.1) 1.0
Ss47 251
5.1 1.4
SW
SE
April
5.5 4.4
Ma:
8.8 5.1
June
Wind direction (from)
tLe Olena Orestes tie 0
337 (1.6
5.8 1.3
-8 1.4
1.5 2.0
INADA OM Phe
dq
elidel
UO 1919 tI
Ww oar wlo
I HOO Ht Ole
Orr rooly
lo-ownww
WaNVANA Ae
I~ aANote
HAA AA
0300
4.0
a
BIG DELTA
Time
of
day
Av.
Av.
2.1 1.2
co.
it
1.5 1.4
13S 8.9
Av.
3.0
5.5 2.9
5.8 6.1
1.8 1.6
Av.
Jul
ooh A a\Ko
DG aaar|K
at
]y <A Ot x Ox
ANNAN IY
12 OO MIP
a ctrl et
Ih 2 1 O wml
Aad dad eld
2 Oy Oy xt xt cD] xt
al daa +a
soo on n|>
A Ht oat
A~AORA\o
HOndw lo
Ko 1 O Olt
Jul
Jul:
At td gl alto
eo BO OY 9 DI
vada ‘Ja
Ob tt rd too
dadddddla
ONO dts
“aww w0 “0
Av.
Ky 19 © 10 at
OH w +10
KO Hw xt CO lt
0 O > 10 @/c~O
COAX lw
cl 3 od Fl cial
st
- Au
ist
Au
August
. . . 2:7 3558) 754 Sik 3 ice
8 (3.9) 252 426 13.5 3.8
1.6 4.8 3.2 3.6 3.1 257,
dia, FGSE 2c) 4 6a a 2.6
ely) Tele iSet) 42 9e oad: 4.6
1.31163 -7.9 3.7 3 4.2
4.6 1.5 6.4 4.4 4.1 2.4 4.2
OOM rt rijto
ddddeled
WOOO Ht Ia
rmUAN NY IC
lO AAO welt
it~ = Ow iD &]woO
I~ UMM ORO
aed Ade
0900
8
A
0200
1500
1700
2000
>
x
tAtahe on
Im O99 0
4.8
AMeAANO
st riaaw 6
hr UM em
Hanvodta
3.2 3.1
Wm or aw
AUdOo@
do ad
2.5 5.6
lomoOOnt
1
2
4
3
1.
2.6 2.1
Av.
2
7
6
8
7 .
2
1.5 1.9
2
Av.
122
See footnotes at end of table.
Calo
SW
Wind direction (from)
SE
da;
1950-58)
SW.
SE
(Av.
Wind direction (from)
GULKANA
Tine
Table 27.--Wind direotion by hour of day, and number of days per month in each direotion class--Continued
of
SW
Wind direction (from)
SE
ODM OD Aw]A or ronda hat om ojo JHonmwotor ht tH Ot
ot ad t ow Oa ato aa do} taonna lo AX AMZ OlO
ot a a aq a
-oaaann MA AOn MIO oon nn Aly ma Mon ala AY yo aie
i Nd a a a a mn daa
OOo mI moNonal”d AMaAr-HAlS hr aoanooalr om oamrlo
° AN NG AANA N MI IAM Ae wy i|ro AANA SH Ol ANuanMala
ON TMA AIO NDANWO HO ~estoOoN wolW Oot DOAN H/o oFManor]rn
It OM a th Haat ola HAMenrwooly NOAM wp wld A 1 1 tm
Aad Add Adda iat dadad a Anda
MOM oa Ho NOAA oO tlt AARAMOr|+ DwWOt AD O/} tO t+ OM d/o
ber] pots Hoo cat] fal) AWONMMA AO PA ela Sh Tr (ie) rF ONM AAI oad mNnNnMA Al
“ a 0
i a 3 3
iS = 6 6
ZORUNANM DIO DAOotdm vin dawgonoonr IN OAM~- ODD BIRO NUNMDMO!Y
Raspes brs aie aifhe Sin sateie| Ne cca ie ce aes eis igeusiisstice| Se dmmen| je marae
lonauna a tI 9 IO ANANA AYA aA Aa a AMNAAMIY
Aout t MID DOA ADIN tat mo jo Ar OMM Old st xt <tc a
[meme moma) (a) a st 00 0 [0 ANNA Ala a rot a i AM AAA AN
Ow VN tt HIG NM-M +t OO nm DORA AO WOUNROW Hiv HA aot oo
i - oy ww OUNAY HO wo a anc woman fat bed I~MA AA wD
m2 OO © Mir mot nn ow tt Or t/a AaAtrOoONNOl!M Sto OD L/D
DOA AA AMI tt dla bed did <t ad Na to mld
lIoa29g000 lInsQa000 oos0000 Io2Q@000 log2o000
essooo,. SSoo00]: IS SS000]- IOSSO000|;- SS9SOOG0|-
ANO OD alo mOWUND A> nO AYW oO > nmAMWM Oo A> rm AWm Oo a]>
COndAAMS COna nae COanaAde OCOn Anne OOnAAMIa
tc OD 9 rd +OODA DA Hote ojo Aw©ounonyn WONOHE4
OMmMNN OI wor aan WO 4 did st NAAN Orn UVA WM]
I~ ONO WMIO WO AMMM Aw ANNAN A wr nm UVOnD MIM woonont dt
StU NA MO] AAA AN EA NVA lO IN AM AN Ml NAA AANA
ootr~uno UE UDA AID loa- ow o to ate AMO; jovrt mh Wolo
HAM aw tle VGAaddavla Ida daaala dad aAnddala ddddaaala
aAovn ono AAD ow +!]y OHOOD +> lo+* HMO Ol maoNn alo
aAadAddala A Ao Qi|ro to 09 Hrd tro |ro a cu ad Olu mana dja
DAOstD O Mio tmMohr wo mio ODO VY O DID mauot tat I~ DOD N|O
tit QU 090 CulCY eo ss fe gwonww +t tit a nS Bed PMC B el sa}
Bi g a 3
aloounn ola ln DOO O/H dooonrly lpQmoate Blt dtm std
1 D AD MH Ojo Mm 9D As IPA HOODOO O|O mONNNA Aid Im UAN A Alda
a Ada ala ddddaAla Adda Ala AAadAalA
monrantel|a xt xt © co @ xt/co ko Hd Aw I]t In doar alo raonnM al
ISddd ald ANN aid AMMNMAAIN Ato tN aig NMNMNANIN
ronte Mla ONT OD HMO OWOAAND OID wndnnnm alo Oaronddthid
oO an ald ANA NAA did a a Coat dAdnvA foal
Ino + WO wa lOormarar|a Hthmaaoclo lamoaaala lonanoaly
lu cu 9 CCU dadaaaala AAgddaalio awa cla IA ro 1 9 CUCU
>|
ma
oeooo080 lIoacaa00 lInagg000 In DOo000 lIoac00000
SSO000|- ISSoodO|. SSoocgo].- ISSSSG0}- ISSoooO}-
ra MYM O Fd] > moOWn oa A> Mm Oq mo dl> mm OAUwW oO dd) > mA UMW O >
OOnA AANA jOOnAANIS OORnAANIS OO nAANIS OOAAANIS
OMAMNAALIO ID OUNM D | INOMNANOEI|d AYA + cuir ODN Awl
AOMNAA tt OU N A HO mam tm nih feds ees Nol ye i - mw oOo
No Dw 1 Ico 1AM OM oho lpomdAato loMaaaoly In 0oo Mo O!H
Naa dala mmaaadia ou 62 6O Hin rar aa m9 ala doaaala
auoown a/m tADOAN OID Ot ONADD UMROD Alt oO OHO VID
Od a daaaaa Ald anannala xd Hd qufro qd ddA
ID a tt © Jao OA LAO 2 OO — 9 O/H Mm oO MIN Oo ~lin 1p OOM M Ofrd
ONNNA Ala Ammo mw we In Om 0 n/oO 19 wo > h {oO tot Ht 0 Oho
IO 19 9 wlan AVA R +o lnournmtlo NOH dw oOlW NAA olw
g g 3 3
Nada Alea maadaa dia NAaaaw fA NAMA AAA la xt xt 0d ay co]
at tot wlo Ko Ht OF O}O AAO tala mt ao oO o|n HMA Io
ho tt xt xt 0] mt Hn wo ro] VU ddd I Ad eld att ro xt td tro
lo tt OD «| txt th oO xt! ln HA MO MIO out oo ojo WW CODOA|D
Od AANA dAadaa tio ddAadaala d daa
rr 0 1 MD hwo Hotnnolh jo UO MD O|M HARUNO M+ OADM oO O|
DAA ard reer aol ro Hr 0 19 Ito Aan nla mAanaaMmla
AQ aia b cs) lu
SSS
holst]
lIocca00 liog0000 iIooo000 loceg000 lona000
ISOGOOG0}:; ISSo000].: essgeeo.: Sseeool,: esssgo.
mOdH oO > OU oO 4} > OM wo 4]|> BUH OD d|> OUHOdl>
SCOd AAA OOAAANISA SOAAAaIa OCGA AAMe SOddA Aaa
Calm
3.5
Le ed
2.8 2.2
4.6 2.4
SW
April
2.1 3.0
1.4
May
1.7 4.6
June
2.1 8.6
1.8 6.8
SE
August
Wind direction (from)
9.0 3.2
5.4 1.4
5.7 1.9
2.9 2.0
cul
6.0 1.6
3.6 1.3
4.9
3.9
3.5
3.3 2.6
1.7
2.6 7.0
2.8 5.8
1.6 1.6
A)
4
1.5
LAKE MINCHUMINA
Time
of
1500
Av.
Av.
0900
0300
1500
2100
Av.
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
Av.
8
9
1.2
Eo
“6
a1
3
aT
a9
-6
6
a)
2
2T
A)
2.2
S509 wie
8.8 1.4
8.8 1.4
6.3 1.7
6.8 2.1
6.6 1.6
TO: 1.6:
Tea 9
8.1
9.0 2.3
eB 221
SW
2.7 6.9 11.8 1.8
Sel Oh Deal ated
2.6 4.3 14.0 1.6
Anle One BLO. O! nee
SoG 95.7 (1L.0n-8
3.9 4.4 10.0 2.0
1.3 4.0
Set S21.
1.8 3.6
1.6 3.8
1.6 5.6
3.4 4.7
4.4 2.9
3.7 3.7
1.6 3.8
2atiage.0
4.2 9.4
2rouoee
April
May
June
July
August
123
SE
6.3 4.6
Wind direction (from)
7.5 3.6
7.4 3,1
122370
4.8 1.4
5.5 1.7
2.7 2.4
1.4 3.1
ney Aeron
3.7 4.3
1.2 4.6
20) Poh
2.6 3.3
a es)
6.9 4.6
3.8 5.6
4.2 4,7
4.8 4.2
5.2 4.8
4
ne
8
poe be}
1.0
ef)
29.
4
2
1.9
1.8 3.1
(a See}
253) 379
2.8 3.8
2.4 3.0
ere seal
$.1 2.9
2/9) ae!
6
2
79
1.8 3.4
“4
a
KOTZEBUE
Tine
of
1500
0300
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
2100
Av.
Av.
Av.
Av.
3.3
eee.
4,7
2.7
1.7
2.9
6
4.4
3.0
al
4.0 2.8
2.6 1.2
5.5 1.6
3.2 1.7
3.9 1.5
3.1 1.9
4.3 2.1
sw
5.6
Dainese o
ely real
3.0
2.6 2.1
2.8 4.8
2.2 6.4
2.0 4.8
April
Ma.
August
Wind direction (from)
SE
6.8 4,4
Tl 3.5
Tea 6.7
6.0 6.4
8.1 6.4
6.6 5.4
-8 10.8 7.2
6
A
1.2.1.2
ek Fr ia a i Sea oe
See a}
3.4 1.7
1.5
Lz
See footnotes at end of table.
Av.
Av.
Av.
Av.
mued
ction class-—Contin
wh. dir
sach
of deys per month in
number
ection by hour of day, a
dir
bls 27 .--Wind
Wind direction (froc)
Ni Cals
from)
Li
@
SW
ion
Wind direc
Calin
Wind direction (from)
0300
5
oot
June
i st O19 19
G8 arial
ie
19 © 9
(eee o
mano o
91
1200
~~,
Fie alo
ou
a)
1600
2100
oaoo00
oom a
Ii]
2
8
o
i)
9
i
a}
1 0 oe 1O]IO
reat cul
@e20000
OO9SGG00
2 yo O rit
OO Art et ast
nm (2ro=)
ti
Wind direc
fron)
ion (
z
ind direc
W
ti
direc
ind
0500
on (froz)
2800
Weather Bureau coded date
124
254
8-12 13-18 19-24
April
Wind velocity, m-.p.h.
4-7
BETTLES
Time
of
Baz
1950-58)
8-12 13-18 19-24
April
Wind velocity, m.p-h.
(Av.
4-7
9.7
0-3
4.1
BETHEL
Time
of
dey
0300
25+
Table 28.--Wind velocity by hour of day, and number of days per month in each velocity class
ae
4.2
5.8
8-12 13-18 19-24
10.7
Wind velocity, m.p.h.
April
4-7
9.8
8.3 13.9
4.8 12.4
ath alktyé
ANCHORAGE
0300 14.8
0900
1200
Tine
3.7
0900
to
-0
-8
4,
3.7
May
8
8.1 11.
1500
0300
4
eat
Lei
C4
3.
11.0
qas2.
May
pale
3.7 11.0
1200
1800
0300
0900
1200
ol
ol
10.2
9.3
May
4.3
Cy a
S27
1500
18600
2100 12.4
Av.
0300 14.6
1.6
68
12.0
ito}
a
a)
a9
ape
at
!
4
ict a
fa
1800
2100
eile
9.8
oh
2
1
2100
Av.
10. 8.
5.2
8
a)
8
1800
2100. 10.9
6.2
Av.
June
6.0
0300 12.0 10.7
June
3.
1235
a alae
0300
0900
June
9.9 AE) a8
8.0
away é
=} ral: eb
3.2 10.9
0300 15.8
0900
“
9
“31200
aleyed
1.0
1200
1500
1800
3.
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
1.8 9.8
4.1
1500
1800
far)
10.5
1.0
OST
-6
Sie 10.1
8.3
‘fear allO's
8.2
9.0 10.8
0
3.
200° 12/59
Av.
ive)
13.6
Av.
3.
822
4
2.8
July
6.3
aii
August
5.9 10.8
9.7 14.0
922
0300
1200
1506
1800
2100
mile
6.2
4.
July
11.8
13.4
August
10.7
See
CR
BEET a sllel are)
-6
2.4. 10.9
al
2:2
1200
1800
2100
0900
Av.
Ve
3.8 10.7
0300
03900
1200
Fal
2.2
3.7
3.7
Sisal
July
ihesh
41.2
11.0
8.3
4.2
August
2.6
8.4
7.3 14.6
Deee 11201
3.6" 12.0
6.4 12.0
9.3
922 S114
2100 14.1
0300 17.9
Av.
0900
1200
1500
1800
We
0300 18.6
a
“1 1500 «6.0
Ae)
9
10.2
4.2 10.0
2100
ol
el
ae
50
2.1
79
4.0
6.2
5.
8
Heal
6
9
12.9
Cs
aba ale as)
-8
6.0 14.4
5.6 13.5
1800" 10-9° 20).
2100 14.7
0900 10
1200
1500
Av.
Av.
ct
TE
9
257
beet
8-12 13-18 19-24
.0
10
Wind velocity, m.p.-h.-
A
4-7
0-3
YUKON
03001/3.6 11.3
FT.
Time
of
day
25
8-12 13-18 19-24
ONT
April
Wind velocity, m.p.h.
4-7
7.9
0-3
FAIRBANKS
0300 16.1
Time
of
day
267
2.0
3.2
2
2.2
4.2
8-12 13-18 19-24
6.0
Wind velocity, m-.p.h.
April
4-7
0-3
9.1 11.4
fag
BIG DELTA
Time
of
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
day
Av.
0900
8.2
0900 14.1
1200
3.1
feel
8
1200
1500
1800
78
6.7
8.1
e
iat)
4
ee
2.8
5.7
6.0
8.8
rs)
1.6
tice)
6.8
10.3
He
2.1
1222
June
one
al
9.2
1
-2
aR
29
Data missing
Data missing
Ae6. 125
1.3 10.3
1002/ 2
Av.
1200
1500
1800
2100
esi
0300
Av.
2
0900
pal
a
1-0
6x2
6.0
9.0 1.
May
EB
June
ant
8.2 12.0
9.0 1
0300 13.9 10.1
2100
0900
2100
wit
-8
rte!
eee
<9
2
aE
al
af
Oeil
2.0
1.
a)
4.0
6.3
6.2
8.2
May
5.3
ee
9.9
eh
June
9.5
foal
9.7
7.8
6.0 10.6
6.7
CRP SERA)
Grr ore
3.8
2.4
on. 226
3.8
5.2
0300
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
0900
4
3.1 15.
1.4 11,2
0300
0900
<i
8.8
0300 16.3
AE)
-6
7.4 1.0
6.4 14.2
4,8. 12.6
5.1 10.6
Geile “AOS
4.3 10.3
7.0 12.3
o22) 17
0300
eal
ok
6.7
AE)
9.2
NOs
July
A
Data missing
1.3 11.4
1500
1800
2100
cal
22
3.1
4.7
3.2
di.
6.7
9.9
fee
July
9.3
4.7 10.3
tok 13.1
0900 10.4
1500
1800
2100
Av.
4
-4
4
Wie)
Tae
July
0300 10.2 13.1
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
7.4
5.5 14.9
222; Wess
0300
0900
9.9
0900 12.6 10.7
0300 17.7
[e}
29
5.8
6.2
8.1
8.
aw
9
10.
8
1200
ak
3.1
4,
6.3
9.3
6-2: 212.3
4.7 11.0
7.8 10.9
1200
1500
1800
-6
8
aa
1.0
1.0
7.6 14.3
6.2 13.0
4.9. 1158
5.9 11.6
6.9 14.0
7.0 13.0
1.6
4.
9.4
9.2
10.0
Data missing
3.2. 1259
Data missing
3.3 13.3
2.4 1222
1800
2100
Av.
1800
2100
Av.
val!
2.2
oe:
10.5
8.9
5.4
F272
August
Sat
125
TONS DEST
0300 17.1 10.6
0900 13.3 10.8
2100. 129L_ U9.
Av.
Bilt
at)
-6
-8
EO
9 3.0
sf
2.0
st
Cae
8.7
6.9
TAA
4.8
7.0
Au
1/ Minor data discrepancy
7.6 10.6
e9e LIE.
Gee TNT
0300 10.9 12.8
0900
2100
Av.
et
(oO
25
0.4
4.0
1.8
2.2
7.0
8-12 13-18 19-24
6.1
Wind velocity, m.p-h.
April
ss--Continued
0-3 4-7
6.9
Ire)
7.6
c
7.4
8.5
8.7
HOMER
Time
of
0300 16.7
0900 11.6
2100 16.0
10.6
0300 18.5
0900
1800
dey
254
0.4
1.3
4
Lee)
1.6
a2
0.9
1.2
3.1
3.1
2.3
3.7
6.0
PE)
3.6
5.8
6.1
8-12 13-18 19-24
April
4.4
4.7
7.3
7.6
5.4
6.8
Wind velocity, m.p.h.
June
(Av. 1950-58)
4-7
7.4
9.8
4
8.
al
8.9
4.1
7.6 10.3
fea
5.2 11.
5.
ine
of
day
0300 11.4 10.6
GULKANA
0900 11.1
1500
1800
2100
0300 11.4
2100
Av.
1200
8
-6
x)
.4
1
25
0.4
0.6
1.8
1.8
12
3.3
9.5
7.8
ore
.--Wind velocity by hour of day and number of days per month in each velocit
222
8-12 13-18 19-24
Table 28
April
7.0
Ma
7.8
aD:
10.6
June _
8.1
Wind velocity, m.p-h.
4-7
fot
5.8
9.0
7.8
8.2
7.3
0-3
6.4
5.6
3.6
4.3
4.
6.4
0300 11.0
0300 12.0
0g00
1200
0300 11.2
GALENA
Time
of
day
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
1500
1800
2100
Av.
“
8.8
3.0
.5
a
4.9
1500
1800
3.8
13.7 (11.3
921
2100
Av.
ait
3.3
Let
on
7.3
3.6
9.7
952
8.2
OR
5.2 10.2
2100
aa!
7.3 6.6 11.6
Jul
2100
Av.
cil
5.6
0300 22.9
“s
a7 h ahiaat
0300
0900
0300 10.6
0900
EQ)
11.6 7.6
3.1 A
3.4
August
8.0
og00 10.0
2100 19.1
3
1.
1.0
2.1
6.7
4.0
4.2
8.7 3.6
4.
8.8
Tekh
6.6 10.2
3.7
62959) 8.2
Au
1500
2100
-4
75
4.9
75
St
Ze9
Au;
2
9.1
Av.
©
Aan
0300 20.4
0900 13.4
72
of
5.4
0300 11.5 10.3
03900
1200
ne
4
972
9.9
8.0
03500 10.2
1.0
9.2
3.8
9.1
6.9
1800 10.3
2100 18.9
-2
4.2
Et
8.2
6.5
8.8
5.1 10.9
TODS!
3.9
1800
2100
79
-6
2.2
1.0
5.0
3.8
11.4
10.8
“tt
“!
icon mledaam Lose!
Av.
25
0.1
nSTé
2.2
4.2
5.0
Toa!
8-12 13-18 19-24
7.0
Wind velocity, u.p.h.
April
4-7
6.8
8.7
1500 10.0 10.9
1800 10.3 10.2
LAKE MINCHUMINA
Time
of
0900 14.2
0300 17.3
Bef
3.1
3.6
ST
3.3
4.0
4.2
6
3.
6.4
8
8.1
8-12 13-18 19-24
7.0
Wind velocity, m.p.h.
April
4-7
6.6
6.0
3.8
221:
1.4
1.8
KOTZEBUE
Time
of
dey
0900
1200
1500
1800
257
1.9
2.2
ded
6
3.8
5.2
il
8.2
8-12 13-18 .19-24
6.8
7.8
Wind velocity, m.p-h.
Apr
4-7
9.3
6.2
0-3
ee:
7.6
5.2
ILTAMNA
Time
of
dey
0300
0900
1200
st
tal
2100 11.6 10.1
6.8 7.4
2.9.
2100
Av.
fl
5.8
959
1252
7.8
iam!
6.6
1.8
2.1
3.6
6.0
Mey
7.8 14.7
0900
4
1.3
1.4
aleae
5.8
9.6
May _
alr d
4.7
Ma
5.6
10.0
8.4
0300
0900
14.1
6.7 13.7
8.8 11.4
2100 10.4 12.4
Av.
4.6
1200
1560
1800
3.7
2.9
TETé
a
9.3
10.7
i}
1200
6.8
6.9
ARO s S00 ear. 6.O0n etree 7.8
4.8
1.8
et
3.1
eT
32
Per
10.1
cae
2.1
Pee
2.6
st
ok
6.6
6.8
6.3
Au
6.4
5.7
oat)
9.2
te 2RHo
2100 12.3 (11.2
652 22.0
8.3 12.6
z6a2 20
0300 16.3 9.2
1800 10.1 10.1
0900
1800
2100
0900 11.6
1800 12.2
Av.
1500
-8
1.2
atl
1.8
-6
1.3
1.0
nlai/
east
2.0
Ba)
1.8
Stf
1.0
3.0
STE
3.7
4.7
6.0
6.8
5.4
8.2
7.5
9.0
9.8
9.0
9.0
9.2
Et
9.7
7.3
7.5
9.8
st
June
9.8
13.3
9.3
10.2
Jul
922)
O37,
Au.
8.
9.2
5.2
4.2
6.3
7.0
4.1
4.9
2.9
4.1
1.9
-6
1.2
1-2
1.0
-6
2100
1800
2100
Av.
0300
-8
76
3.6
2.2
8.0
10.8
Ted
3.4
4.1
8.1
June
8.0
Hise
July
Au.
10.3
-5
7.8
4.8
9.6
9.5
4.2
92.
5.8
3.8
2.8
2100
Av.
Av.
0300 11.4
0900
Av.
0300
0900
1200
1500
aS
oe}
6.0
ret
6.3
ail
-5
10.9 11.4
9.8
126
9.0
2.1
-9
5.2
Av.
19-24 25
He)
3.6
4.6
«1
8.2
8-12 13-18
April
4
9.
7.8
Wind velocity, m.p-h.
May
4-7
9.7
a)
8.8
9
8
NORTHWAY
Time
of
0300 14.7
0300 16.0
0900
1200
0900
257
ai
ees
2.4
a
1.5
79
2.
0
ph
4
Vee
19-24
eae
Te
8-12 13-18
9),
1950-58)
April
Wind velocity, m.p-h.
May
(ov
4-7
6.2
6.6
5.0
4.7
8.9
ime
of
day
1500
1800
2100
Av.
NAKNEK
0900
1200
0300
0900
25
0.1
0.2
al
3.2
2
0.8
1.
8-12 13-18 19-24
April
2.8
6.8
8.2
OMT.
259.
Table 28 .--Wind velocity by hour of day and number of days per month in each velocity class--Continued
May
Wind velocity, m.p-h.
4-7
8.0
“6
6.9
6.3 12.2
8
953 - 10.7
4.3 11.0
On 7) -10.4
4.8 10.6
6.4 11.0
2100 14.9
Av.
0-3
McGRATH
‘ime
of
day
0300 19.3
0900 14.1
1200
1500
1800
0300 19.3
0900
1200
aw
if
5.0
13.7
6.6
4.1
L
4.2 3.2
6
te)
4.7 Dial
eats 4
1200
ee
10.8
Gut
6
8.0
ol
12.8
June
5
10.2
12;
1322.
12.
9.0
9.9
8.2
Gay,
a)
4
10.6 10.3
74
3.1
3
1278) 20:7
5
1800
2100
0300
ie
«9
2.0
Oe
Di
3.3
92:
June
10.8
10.2
-6
4.2
5.4
Bae
Gin:
3.9
2.8
iat)
1800
2100
Av.
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
pee
3.2
4,
4.
Lis
2.6
129)
15S
6.1
June
2.8
Gee
10.8
9.2
11.4
6.3
8.0
8.8 10.4
8.4
856-1156
4.4 11.3
4.4 10.8
9.7 12.3
8.5 10.7
2100F ere 1A
1500
1800
0300 18.1
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
Av.
8.8 10.4
6.5
Av.
=
Av.
ead
6 E
4 -6
4,
5
9
Jul
CPae
Gail ee
alale
11.2
6.4
42° 20:6
5.5 10.7
9.2 12.6
(28 MOeS
0300 14.9
0900
1500
1800
2100
fed
4
8
3.2
Jul
12.4
90
6.7
3
5.
920
3.6
2.4
3
6.6 10.1
4.8
0300
0900
1200
1500
AY)
3.0
3.2
2.2
2.0
3.1
6.3
10.8
July
9.6
Br1
Deen len’,
3.8 13.0
4.1 14.3
0900 12.4 10.4
0300 18.9
1200
1500
1800
an
or
11.3
7.3
ais 4.8 13.4 al 6
LOsnL 3.1 4
1800
2100
Av.
10.1
6.1
2100. 11.2. 12.5
2574
3.1
st
1.5
1.0
9.4
5.0
8-12 13-18 19-24
10.8
9.0
6.2
April
7.0
8.0
Au
Wind velocity, m.p.h.
6
9.
6.8 10.5
9.4
4-7
8.4 12.0
11.7
9.1 10.4
6.2
0-3
0300 15.7
0900
1500
1800
2100) 1257
UNALAKLEET
Time
of
day
Av.
T
1.0
3
1.2
Sif
1.1
el
ark
2.2
st
6.8
8-12 13-18 19-24 257
Au
10.4
April
Wind velocity, m.p.h.
5.0
6.0
4-7
-8
-6
+4
a6)
Seah
of
6.2
0-3
ak
(oa
da
an
See.
5.1
0300 5.6
0900 «44.9
1200
1500
1800
2100
0.1
5
10.0
11.
et
6
0900
1200
1500
TANANA
‘Time
of
day
Av.
pal
aa
a
264
220)
3.0
1.4
aber
8-12 13-18 19-24
August
April
eit,
3.1
956:
8.4
4.
7.0
10.4
Wind velocity, m.p.h.
ae)
CAC EEC)
8
10.2
822m 10) 0
6.6 11.1
Jeo) LA.
929
4-7
Ga tO.e.
0-3
0900 11.9
1200
1500
2100 15.2
0300 18.2
1800
Av.
Av.
SUMMIT
Time
of
da:
0300 14.8
0900
0.2
lef
al
4.7
6.6
7.4
9.1
6.4
4.4
0300 10.1
0900
desis
is
rere)
3.8
wee
as)
cell
3.
1.7
7.0
6.8
5.0
6.1
7.8
tee.
7.8
tee
Bite
12.
10.9
June
July
10.1
6.4
6.7
4,
6.6
3.4
3.2
+4
4.0
2
0300
1500
1800
2100
Av.
0300
1
ol
1200
Av.
0900
1.0
“4
1.2
Pte
4,
2.0
8.0
oy
Chewé
10.2
4.0
13.5
May
10.0
6.1
Fae
June
Jul
6.
oe)
re
629
9.3
3.9
a9)
4.1
5.8
2100 10.4 11.7
ol
6.0
5.6
a)
2100 13.1 411.4
1500
0300 18.9
1200
1500
0300 18.0
1200 16.
1500
1800
Av.
Av.
ol
al
3
el
ol
4.7
3.1
On5
8.
May
6.9
3
June
6.1
6.1
fete)
6.6
9.8
at)
8
2.6
Av.
0300 13.4
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
Av.
0300 11.1
0900
2100
Av.
5.7
De)
11.6
©
1
Sue
Av.
Au
Av.
August
127
Pool allo ets)
4.6 10.0
0300 13.1 11.9
0900
1200
el.
United States Weather Bureau coded data.
Source:
0300 13.
0900
1200
Av.
Table 29 .--Amount of cloud cover by hour of day, and number of days per month in each cover class
(Av. 1920-53)
ANCHORAGE: BETHEL BEETLES BIG DELTA FAIRBANKS FT. YUKON
8° cloud cover (tenths) *im° loud cover (tenths) *3"* Cloud cover (tenths) TAB Cloud cover (tenths) 73" Cloud cover (tenths) 77" Cloud cover (tenths)
day 0-3 4-7 8-10 dey 0-3 cet 8-10 dey 0-3 4-7 8-10 day 0-3 4-7 8-10 dey 0-3 4-7 8-10 day 0-3 4-7 8-10
April April April April April
0300 10.8 3.0 16.2 os00. 11.4 3.2 15.2 03500 13.6 4.2 12.2 0300 12.2 4.9 12-9 0300 neve) 4.0 13.8 0500 2 21.0
0900 8.6 3.8 ATT os00 7.0 229) S2051) os00 11.0 4.4 14.6 03900 8.7 6.0 15.5 os00 9.6 4.6 15.9 0900 5 14.0
1200 7.8 3.3 18.9 1200 6.2 2:9) “e029 1200 11.7 3.9 14.5 2200 8.7 6.7 14.7 1200 9.8 4&4 15.1 2200 22.1 13.0
1500 7.4 4.2 18.3 1500 6.7 prey (mee sind f 1500 11.6 4.3 14.1 2500 7.8 7-0 15.2 1500 20.6 4.2 15.3 1500 21.9 24.0
1800 2 4.7). 18-2 1800 8.4 3.4, 91621 1800 11.4 5.3 13.2 1800 7.8 5.8 16.4 1800 9.3 4.5- 16.5 1800 11-9 23.0
2100 9.8 3.6 16.7 2100 8.8 4.35 16.8 2100 14.3 4.7 11.0 2100 11.9 6.35 11.8 2100 12.2 4.1 13.8 2100 14.7 12.0
Av. 8.6 3.8 17.6 Av. Bap Tssem lass Av. 12 SSaae DinoTe Av. 9:5 Glut ee4 Av. 10:6 uua<omeROs Av. Is. 12.8
May May May. May May May
0300 5.7 359° 22v4 0300 5.3 3.9\ 21.8 0500 10.1 5.8 15.1 500 79. we 15.9 03500 9.8 4.3 16.9 26.0 4.8 10.2
03900 5.8 4.2 21.0 0900 5.2 S29) 2189) 0300 10.1 6.2 14.7 0900 6.9 8.2 15.9 0900 7.8 5-5 17.9. 13.1 4.8 13.0
1200 4.9 452) 1209 1200 4.3 o59)p 22.8 2200 7.6 8.2 15.2 1200 4.8 8.4 17.8 1200 5.0 5.5 20.7 10.8 7.0 13.2
1500 3.9 4.0 22.6 1500 4.3 3.6 25.1 1500 6.7 8.6 15.6 1500 3.6 8.2 18.9 1500 4.7 5.4 20.9 9.8 7.8 13.4
1800 4.3 4.3 22.3 1800 4.2 4.8 22.0 1800 6.5 6.3 16.3 1800 4.4 7.0 19.6 1800 5.7 5.1 20.2 20.2 7.6 12.8
2200 5.6 £295 2067 2100 5.7 Kye 20.2 2100 9.3 6.7 15.0 2200 7.6 162: 16.2 2100 8.0 5.9 17.2 2.3 6.9 32.8
Av. 5.0 455.207, Av. 4.8 4.2 22.0 Av. 8.7 7.0 15.3 Av. 5.9 7.7 17.4 Av. 6.8 522 29.0 1222 6.5 12.4
June June June June June June
0500 4.7 4.1 21.2 0300_ 4.4 4.0 21.6 0300 ) 6.4 7 0300 5.) 6.2 18.7 0300 5.4 5.6 18.9 03500 BuIA? 6.9 12.4
03900 3.6 4.2 22.2 03900 259) 3.4 23.7 os00 6.9 8.1 ie} 0900 6.2 5.5 18.5 0300 6.1 4.9 18.8 0900 SES 7.4- 12.7,
1200 4.6 4.9 20.6 1200 3.4 3.2 23.5 2200 5.1 9.0 $ 1200 5.8 7.7 16.6 1200 5.2 5.8 19.1 2200 T9 9.2 287)
1500 5.0 5.6 OTA: 1500 3.9 4.4 21.7 1500 ANG Sl Ons? 8 1500 5.2 6.7 18.1 1500 3.7 lec 19.12 1500 6.9 8.7 14.4
1800 4.6 5.0 20.5 1800 4.4 3.6 22.0 1800 6.9 8.8 3 1800 5.0 Get ae 1800 4.6 6.6 18.9 1800 6.1 8.5 15.4
2100 4.0 5.8 20.2 2100 4.3 Seeel. 6 2100 7.8 8.9 3 2100 4.7 8.0 17.3 2100 6.0 5.9 18.2 2100 9.2 7.6 135
Av. 4.4 ra: Mae Av. 5.9 3.8 22.5 Av. CE eat! 8 Av. 5.3 6.8 17.9 Av. 522 6.0 18.6 Av. 8.6 8.2 13.5
July July July = July July . July
3500 5.7 4.7 20.7 03500 3.3 2.5 -3 0500 6.8 6.2 18.0 03500 539 5.4 19.7 0500 5.4 4.6 27.0 0300 22.4 Ce a7
0900 5.6 4.2 21.2 0900 2.6 2.9 6 0300 5.4 5.9 19.7 0900 6.6 5.7 18.8 03900 6.6 4.3 19.9 0900 610.0 5.4 15.6
1200 T2 4.1 Lets 1200 CT 2.3 0 2200 4.7 6.9 19.5 1200 6.35 7.2 17.3 1200 5.6 5.8 197, 1200 6.8 7.9 16.5
1500 6.8 4.7 19.6 1500 2.6 3.2 22 1500 3.9 8.1 19:0 1500 5.9 Tals 17.6 1500 6.0 S25) S19 S7 1500 6.2 8.6 16.2
1800 7.0 4.7 19.35 1800 4.0 3.8 2 1800 4.7 8.4 17.9 1800 6.9 6.4 17.7 1800 6.6 5.5 19.2 1600 7.4 9 2
2100 6.2 5.0 ae 2100 4.8 3.3 9 2100 6.8 6.2 18.0 2100 5.4 7.6 18.0 2100 6.3 Sal Ey 2200 9.4 6.4 i
Av. 6.4 4.6 20.0 Av. 3.35 3.0 aif Av. 9.4 6.9 16.7 Av 6.2 6.6 18.2 Av. 6.1 Parag.) Av. 8.7 Tae yak
August August August August August August
0300 4.8 5.4 22.8 0500 ene a ea 0300 5.0 5.0 21.0 0300 6.7 4.8 19.6 0300 5.2 4.5 22.6 0300, 10.4 5.6 25:0
0900 3.8 4.4 22.8 0900 1.0 Uist FB o7, os00 4.1 3.7 23.2 0300 S27 5.6 19.8 03900 4.8 3.0 23.2 os00 8.7 5.2 17.2
1200 4.2 4.4 22.3 1200 1.0 1:39 (28.2 1200 3.2 5.0 22.8 1200 5.8 Wet, BTS 1200 4.7 4.6 21.8 2200 6.3 9.3 25.5
1500 4.6 5.0 21.4 1500 1.0 220) goeice 1500 2.4 6.5 22.2 1500 4.6 ttf AGG) 1500 ent 6.1 22.2 1500 5.2 9.8 16.2
1800 4.3 3.2 21.6 1800 1.4 3.0 26.6 1800 3.8 Ten, L959. 1800 4.8 6.6 19.4 1800 3.9 9:0) 22.2 1800 5.2 8.2 17.8
2100 5.2 4.6 21.3 2100 2.4 3.0 25.6 2100 6.5 4.8 19.9 2100 6.5 D56e 9 su 2100 4.7 Delile 2100 8.9 6.0 15.9
Av. 4.5 4.5 22.0 Av. 15 2.4 27.2 Av. 4.1 5.4 21.5 Av. 5.6 653) 19.1 Av. 4.3 4.7 22.0 Av. 7.4 7.5 16.5
GALENA GULKANA HOMER ILITAMNA KOTZESUE LAKE MiNCHUMINA
ae Cloud cover (tenths) nee Cloud cover (tenths) igs Cloud cover (tenths) aa Cloud cover (tenths) aa Cloud cover (tenths) ee Cloud cover (tenths)
day 0-3 4-7 8-10 day 0-3 4-7 8-10 day 0-35 4-7 8-10 day 0-3 4-7 8-10 day 0-5 4-7 8-10 dey 0-5 4-7 8-10
April April April April April April
0300 11.6 4.7 13.8 0300 14.6 4.4 11.0 0500 9n7 ovo" 1654 0500 10.7 3.9 15.4 0500 5 3.6 > 15.7 03500 12.9 3.6 25.6
0900 9.6 4.3 16.1 0900 10.7 5.0 14.3 0900 7.8 4.1 18.1 0900 8.1 4.4 17.6 0300 ak 3.6 17.2 0900 «12.2 3.8 15.0
1200 9.8 4.1 16.1 1200 9.0 5.6 15.4 1200 8.1 4.1 17.8 1200 352. 4.4 16.5 1200 2 3.8 16.0 21200 «610.2 4.2 15.6
1500 9.8 4.0 16.2 1500 1-9; 4.3 17.8 1500 8.1 3.8 18.1 1500 9.6 4.4 16.0 1500 ie} 3.6 15.4 1500 8.6 4.1 27.5
1800 10.0 4.1 15.8 1800 8.1 6.2 15.7 1800 8.5 4.8 16.9 1800 8.8 5.6 15.7 1800 atk 3.9 14.9 1800 8.7 4.2 17.2
2100 11.0 3.3 15.7 2100 (15.9 4.5 11.8 2200 11-2 3.1 15.7 2100 10.7 4.1 25.0 2100 we 2.5 15.5 2100. 25.1 $.2 15.8
Av. 10.3 4.1 15.6 AV. 10.7 5.0 14.5 Av. 8.9 Dooce AVA = OMNES baer 6 Oma RAY,= 7 3.5 ~«(lo.8 RY. 10.5 3:8) Los4
Mey May May Mey May May
0S00 8.6 5.0 17.4 0500 8.7 6.0 16.5 0500 6.3 4.1 20.6 0500 6.0 4.6 20.4 0500 9.6 3.0 18.4 0300 8.0 6.2) 2629
0900 8.5 4.7 18.0 0300 6.3 5.8 18.9 0300 5.6 a6) 8 2029) 0900 5.5 6.2 19.4 0300 S50 4.2 ak feel 0900 8.2 5.9 16.9
1200 6.5 6.1 18.6 1200 4. 6.4 20.4 1200 5.4 4.6 20.8 1200 5.0 Lire 18.9 1200 10.4 4.7 15.9 1200 6.2 6.2 168.6
1500 5.4 5.6 20.0 1500 4.1 4.8 eit 1500 4.8 Soe tae 1500 5.8 6.2 19.0 1500 10.4 4.7 15.9 1500 5.35 6.9 18.7
1800 5.6 5.7 2957) 1809 4.4 i29; | 18's7: 1800 5.3 5.0 20.7 1800 6.8 5.6 18.7 1800 22.3 3.6 15.1 1800 6.6 6.4 18.0
2100 8.0 6.5 16.7 2100 Tet 6.8 16.6 2100 t.2 4.7 _19.1 2100 6.2 5.2 19.4 2100 RES 3.7 5 2100 9.2 4.3 17.4
Av. 7.0 5.6 18.4 Av. Pa] 6.5 18.8 Av. 5.8 4.7 20.5 Av. 5.9 5.8 19.3 Av. 10.7 4.0 3 Av. Te 6.0 17.8
June June June June June June
0300 5.5 7.0 LT 0300 7.6 5.2 17.2 0500 6.35 4.6 19.1 03500 3.7 4.2 20.1 0300 6.6 378 5 0300 5.8 6.0 18.2
os00 6.4 6.0 17.6 0900 6.7 7.3 16.0 0900 5.9 5.1 19.0 0900 5.2 4.8 20.0 0900 Kare 4.3 5 03900 6.2 529)” 2729
1200 aS. eat) 1ok2 1200 5.6 6.2 18.2 1200 6.2 4.3 19.4 1200 4.9 5.6) 19.6 2200 8.3 4.4 +5 1200 4.8 6.8 18.4
1500 3.8 636 19.7 1500 4.0 6.3 19.7 1500 6.2 5.4 18.5 1500 5.6 6.3 18.1 21500 97. 5.0 2 1500 3.0 G-Seo a!
1800 3.6 6.7 19.8 1800 5.0 6.8 18.2 18600 7.35 i ea er 1800 5.6 6.8 17.7 1800 3.3 4.4 2 1800 3.4 6.4 20.1
2100 4.6 6.8 18.4 2100 5.8 6.9 i7.3 2100 7.6 4.7__17.8 2100 4.7 7.0 18.5 2100 8.2 4.8 79 2100 4.7 5.0. 20.2
Av. 4.8 6.5 18.7 Av. 5.8 6.4 17.8 Av. 6.6 4.9 16.5 Av 5.2 5.8 19.0 Av. 8.2 4.5 .3 Av. 4.6 6.2 19-2
July July July July July July.
0300 4.5 5.0 21.5 0300 8.6 4.9 17.6 0300 8.7 4.1 18.2 0300 5.8 3.9 22.3 0300 3.9 $.0 24.1 0300 4.7 19.8
0900 4.2 5.4 21.4 0300 t.9 5.0 18.2 og900 8.2 5.2 FLT.7 os00 5.0 3.7 22.3 03900 4.2 2a, 24.77) os00 S.2 20.9
1200 4.0 5.2 21.8 1200 6.2 6.8 18.0 1200 7.6 5.7 17.8 1200 4.3 4.8 21.9 1200 5.8 4.5 20.9 1200 4.8 20.7
1500 4.0 Se0ne ote 1500 5.7 ices 18.2 1500 8.9 5.0 Lier 1500 5.8 5.4 19.6 1500 6.2 5.1 19.7 1500 5.4 20.7
1800 3.4 6.2) (2154 1800 5.0 5.8 20.2 1800 8.0 5.0 17.9 1500 6.2 5.8 19.0 1800 6.1 4.4 20.5 1800 5.9 20.2
2100 4.2 SeSim elak 2100 7.6 4.7 18.8 2100 8.8 5.5 16.8 2100 5.4 6.2 19.5 2100 6.2 Su7e 22 2100 6.0 19.7
Av. 4.0 Sone to} Av. 6.8 5.7 18.5 av. 8.4 5.0 17.6 Av. 5.4 5 20.6 Av 5.4 he peer ote Av. $.0 20.5
August August August August August August
0300 4.0 3.8 3.2 0300 7.5 5.8 Lio) 0300 6.9 2.4 $2207 0300 5.35 3.0 22.7 0500 3.4 2.0 25.6 0300 $24 21-8
0900 3.0 3.0 ie) 0900 6.8 4.6 19.7 03900 5.7 4.6 20.8 0900 2.8 4.4 235.8 0900 3.4 2.0 25.6 0900 3.3 23.8
1200 2.4 3.0 6 1200 6.1 5.8 19.1 1200 5.4 4.4 21.1 1200 a9: 5.3 25.8 1200 5.0 CEs earl 1200 4.0 25.8
1500 1.9 3.9 ia 1500 6.6 5.7 18.8 1500 5.0 4.8 21.2 1500 2.6 6.4 22.0 1500 3.9 4.0 23.1 2500 4.3 235.9
1800 2.8 4.2 ie) 1800 6.1 6.1 18.8 1800 6.1 O28) ele 1800 229 6.1 22.0 1800. 4.7 3.2 23.1 1800 5.5 22.4
2100 3.0 4.8 25.2 2100 8.2 6.2 16.6 2100 7.0 5.0 19.0 2100 3.5 5.7% 22.0 2100 4.2 3.5 4 2100 . 4.2 22.4
Av. 2.8 3.8 74 Av. 6.8 Stinleed Av. GOmun accu COs Olen. leAMis 3.1 Seaeeas Av. a ass Av. 2 4.1 23.0
ST EE a Ce as ee ee ee ee
128
Table 29.--Amount of cloud cover by hour of day, and number of days per month in each cover class--Continued
(Av. 1950-58)
McGRATH NAKNEK NORTHWAY SUMMIT TANANA UNALAKLEET
ne Cloud cover (tenths) ae Cloud cover (tenths) id Cloud cover (tenths) ee Cloud cover (tenths) as Cloud cover (tenths) ane Cloud cover (tenths)
day 0-3 ~=«4-7~SC«-10.—St—éhny 0-3 4-7 8-10 day 0-3 4-7 ~~8-10 day 0-3 4-7 ~—«8-10—S day 0-3 4-7 ~=—«8-10_—Ss day 0-3 4-7 ~—«8-10
April April April April April April
0300 10.7 3.6 15.8 0500 10.2 3.2 16.6 0300 8.4 4.6 IezS) 0300 11.3 4.3 14.3 0500 13.7 5.1 11.2 0300 10.4 3.4 16.1
0900 9.6 4.6 15.9 03900 6.7 3.9 19.4 0900 8.6 4.7 16.8 0900 9.9 3.7 16.4 0900 Leo: 5.7 12.4 0900 7.8 4.4 fart,
1200 9.7 4.2 16.1 1200 6.1 3.8 20.1 1200 7.3 5.4 17.2 1200 9.7 3.3 LTO 1200 W251 4.8 13.1 1200 8.3 5.1 16.6
1500 8.6 5.4 16.0 1500 5.2 5.6 19.2 1500 Misc 5.5 17.6 1500 7.4 4.8 17.8 1500 10.9 4.9 14.1 1500 9.8 3.8 16.5
1800 8.6 4.6 16.9 1800 6.9 4.4 18.7 1800 6.9 5.3 17.8 1800 8.2 5.1 16.8 1800 10.6 6.4 13.0 1800 8.9 4.1 17.2
2100 ll.1 4.1 14.8 2100 9.8 4.6 naa 2100 EOI 4.1 15.8 2100 (10.3 4.3 15.3 2100 14.2 4.8 mete! 2100 10.8 4.6 14.7
Av. CG 4.4 15.9 Av. 7.5 4.2 18.3 Av. 65a 4.9 17.0 Av. 9.5 4.2 16.3 Av. 12.2 5.3 12.5 Av. 9.3 4,2 16.5
Mey _ May May May May Nay
0300 Te Gyeat 18.7 0300 5.3 4arL -6 0300 3.8 7.0 20.2 0300 faa 3.7 = ©=620.1 0300 10.9 6.8 13.6 0300 1.9 5.1 18.0
03900 7.8 4.2 19.0 0900 3.3 3.3 3 0900 ar 6.2 20.7 0900 Gant 4.6 19.8 0900 oe2 6.2 15.7 03900 8.7 5.0 17.3
1206 5.4 29 Se eO il, 1200 2.35 5.4 <2 1200 2.8 S29 22'3 1200 5.3 7.6 18.0 1200 TL 7.6 16.3 1200 7.4 5.9 177
1500 4.3 5.9 20.8 1500 2.0 4.9 sal 1500 2.3 4.7 24.0 1500 5.4 6.2 19.3 1500 5.9 8.3 16.8 1500 6.9 6.2 L7.9
1800 5.2 5.1 20.7 1800 3.0 5.7 .3 1800 3.6 4.9 22.6 1800 6.1 6.2 18.7 1800 7.8 5.4 17.8 1800 Tol 6.2 17.7
2100 7.5 4.4 ngs 2100 3.1 7.6 at 2100 5.0 5.6 2054 2100 eh 5.2 18.0 2100 9.0 7.4 14.6 2100 8.2 5.4 17.3
AVA ROLC DEA CIN@LOTS & AVs; © Gs2 Sse e@2.65 AV, 3.6 Sal ebay Av. 6.4 5.6 19.0 AV. 8.0 6.9 15.8 AV. Ts See 4
June June June June June June
0300 5.1 AM TUSteO. 2 0300 3.3 4.3 .3 0300 3.6 Bes Nee g: 0300 4.6 3.9 21.6 0300 Tal 8.3 14.6 0300 5.3 4.6 20.1
0900 5.3 S29F #2078 0900 O57. 4.0 3 0900 4.8 §.3 19.9 0900 4,0 3.9 22.1 0900 6.7 8.35 15.0 0900 5.4 5.6 19.0
1200 4.1 5.1 20.8 1200 3.1 3.7 Jc) 1200 3.2 7.3 9. 1200 2.8 4.9 22.3 1200 4.8 8.2 aby Ate} 1200 5.4 6.2 18.3
1500 3.7 4.8 21.6 1500 2:9 5.4 ith 1500 2.9: 5.0) 322.5 1500 3.3 5.8 20.9 1500 3.2 ao) 16.6 1500 5.7 6.2 18.1
1800 3.7 5.6 20.6 1800 3.6 ae <2 1800 3.1 Del. eels 1800 3.3 6.7 20.0 1800 4.7 8.7 Gay, 1800 5.4 6.6 18.0
2100 5.3 4.6 20.1 2100 3.8 4.9 -3 2100 ape aii eee 2100 4.2 5.3 20.4 2100 5.0 8.6 16.5 2100 5.7 5.3 19.0
Av. 4.5 4.8 20.7 Ave 3.2 4.6 aa Av. 3.4 Soe, les Av. 37 5.1 21.2 Av. 5.2 8.7 16.1 , Av. 5.5 5.8 18.7
July July July July July July
0300 4.6 3.8 22.7 0300 2.8 5.0 25.2 0300 3.4 Sav) “2be8: 0300 5.7 Stay 221 0300 8.2 4.3 18.4 0300 3.3 5.7 22.0
0900 5.9 Oe Oi 216 0900 3.3 252) 25.4 0900 4.9 6.4 19.7 0900 5.1 3.2 22.6 0900 6.2 6.4 18.3 0900 3.2 4.8 23.0
1200 4.2 5.0) °21.8 1200 3.2 3.4 24.3 1200 4.3 6.4 20.2 1200 4.4 4.9 21.7 1200 4.7 6.8 19.6 1200 3.7 6.1 21.2
1500 3.7 5.1 22.2 1500 2.9 4.2 23.9 1500 3.3 7.3 20.3 1500 4.1 Din ele 1500 4.2 6.0 20.8 1500 4.2 6.6 20.2
1800 4.3 3.4 23.2 1800 3.1 5.0 22.9 1800 4.2 ber! 20.9 1800 5.0 4.0 22.0 1800 eet) fale 20.0 1800 4.1 6.0 20.9
2100 4.3 Onfseees.0 2100 3.4 4.2 23.3 2100 4.8 5.5: 20.9 2100 6.3 3.7 20.9 2100 4.6 anek 19.3 2100 3.9 5.9.8 2152
Av. 4.5 eee Av. 3.1 3.7 © ©624.2 Av. 4.2 6.2 20.6 Av. 5.1 4.1 21.8 Av. 5.3 6.35 19.4 Av. 3.7 5399 2ls4
August August August August August August
0300 Chae Onlin eae 0300 3.5 2.8 24,9 0300 4,4 4.6 22.0 0300 4.2 4.1. 22.7 0300 5.2 3.8 22.0 0300 3.0 3.1 24,9
0900 3.0 USS 26s 0900 2.0 1.6 27.4 0900 4.6 4.8 21.6 0900 2.9 2.9 25.2 0900 3.4 Oo4. 2252 0900 2.7, O21 25.2
1200 Zot 3.8 25.0 1200 1.4 3.6 26.0 1200 3.4 6.1 21.5 1200 2.6 4.0 24.4 1200 3.1 5.4 22.4 1200 2.4 3.4 25.1
1500 Nist/ 3.4 (25.9 1500 pleal 4.3 25.6 1500 raph tee 2156 1500 3.0 3.1 24.9 1500 2.3 5.4 23.2 1500 2.4 3.4 25,1
1800 3.6 3.4 24.0 1800 2.1 4.9 24,0 1800 3.2 626); £212 1800 3.1 3.7 24.2 1800 3.8 6.0 21.3 1800 2.4 3.4 25.1
2100 4.0 3.6 23.4 2100 2.4 4.9 23.7 2100 5.2 5.9 19.9 2100 4.8 3.3 22.9 2100 6.1 4.1 20.8 2100 3.2 3.8 24,0
Av 3.0 3.2 24.8 Av. 2:20: o.7) 2513 Av. 3.8 5.97 eels Av. 5.4 3.5 24.1 Av. 4.0 5.0 22.0 Av. ZiT 3.4 24.9
Source: United States Weather Bureau coded data.
129
Table 30.--Visibility distance by hour of day, and number of deys per month in each distance class
(Av. 1950-58)
ANCHORAGE
Time Visibility in miles Visibility in miles n
of 0- 3/16 nml/o= alae oa Fil ayes abe is ° T 3
day 1/8 _-3/8 3/4 2-1/2. 46 T+ dey i/s_-3/a__ 3/4 2-1/2 6 T+ day _if/e -3/8 3/4 2-1/2 6 as
April April April
0300 Osi OL) 0.8 0.7 28.3 0300 0.2 LifimnselGeneo sO 810500: 0.4 O:Bie ea
0900 2 fameale 28.4 0900 0.2 ney 1.3. 2.4 26.0 0900 2 8 1.0 28.0
1200 pal RS oO, 28.6 1200 .2 28). SUG 27-45 keOo 0.1 Ail ce ies ay.
1500 -4 = 1.0 28.6 1500 2 Pi: ene 1: ee 110, 0) au! aS noe Teen
1800 <8) a 28.8 1800 2 aye Alar ie rare TUGeT0) 2 1.0 292m 9
2100 comet 29.3 2100 -2. 3 9 2.1 26.5 2100 hi -8. 28.5
ve =o! eer 28.6 Av. v1 me oie srasch Oe 2 Bose fee Sn:
May May Mey
0300 aa = 30.8 0300 0.3 a 2 6 79 28.6 03500 0.2 Eal = 6 23 29.6
0900 eal 30.9 0900 pal 160, LoS 29204 0900 2 eS -7 29.8
1200 31.0 1200 2 -7 30.1 1200 ath 2 2) 30.5
1500 31.0 1500 ae} -7 30.0 1500 As oes
1800 rae 30.9 1800 ls -4 30.5 1800 =i 2 SONG:
2100 2 30.8 2100 Ail mal -6 30.2 2100 el 2 Sv s0-5
Av. aD 30.9 Av. 1 ee “i 25 Sremeoan! wAVE al aK TSEcOLS
June June June
0300 (0.1 2 9 28.8 0300 2 a Bi -4. +«21-7 26.5 0300 1.6 28.4
03900 8 29.2 0900 TEOas920 27 0900) =lget omOBsG
1200 3 29.7 1200 4 -8 28.8 1200 .2 Sth Aca
1500 roe yt 29.7 1500 2 -T 29.1 1500 =i, cal -8 29.0
1800 2 (29*8 £1800) -8 29.2 1800 -4 29.6
2100 4 29.6 2100 22 -4 29.4 2100 ok ee)
Av 5 29.5 Av. ay Bal Papen POLO AVE 5 1.0 28.9
July July July
0300 a 1 Tolar esse; 0S00 enh a a Pidigg oad ress)» 0800 12 2 +2 TS vag les ed re
0900 41.2 29.4 0900 sl: 2.1 2.7 26.1 0900 +4 TOM Lo Samet
1200 Su 133 29.4 1200 -9° 2.0 28.1 1200 ol 2 +3 2.5 28.2
1500 3 1.0 29.8 1500 -8 1.6 28.6 1500 -2 othe Bere Ahr
1800 a CT: 29.8 1800 -7 1.9 28.4 1800 2 -4 2.0 28.4
2100 als 31.6 29.0 2100 1.1 1.7 28.2 2100 5 : 2.5 27.8
Av. zat Analy 29.4 Av. aul al Dias aoiae. tke 2 “1 -8 1.9. 28.0
August August August
0300 ae 72 sop rLsO 29.3 0300 ae Alien Vs 9 ase Sin e2nn | 0500; 2 a] i) 1.0 3.4 25.8
0300 sa 152 29.4 0900 .2 4.4 3.6 22.8 0900 a +2 1.4 2.8 26.5
1200 Ral WE.) 30.1 1200 1.6 4.2 25.2 1200 ot -7 2.0 28.2
1500 ar 30.3 1500 -9 3.8 26.3 1500 -T 2.1 28.2
1800 2 eal ee 30.4 1800 pla enh olsoae velle2) +2 +6 1.5 28.6
2100 1.2 29.8 2100 zy Tec emcee wenr 2100 +8 2.0 28.2
Av. Ba at Seng, 29.8 Av. T ms 2 22 OMROnT Av. at a al +8 2.3 27.6
BIG DELTA FAIRBANKS FT. YUKON
Time 3 i i Time Visibility in miles Time Visibility in miles
of 0- = of 0- 3/i6 1/2= «1 - = of 0 3/16 je a
day 1/8 T+ aay U/B.) 6=3/8e 23 /SUn Seo 6 T+ day 1/8 _-3/8 «3/4 2-1/2 6 T+
April April
03500 0.7 0-7 28.6 0300 0.2 1.5 28.6 0300 0-2 0.9 0.6 27.3
0300 6 1.4 28.0 0900 0-1 1.2~ 28.7 0900 6 AT COUT,
1200 ar -4 29.2 1200 a1 -4 29.5 1200 4 1.0 28.6
1500 13 3 29 1500 42 02958) 2500 a :7 28.9
1800 -6 -2 29.2 1800 ait .2 29.7 18002/ a5 26) 127:9
2100 0.1 ae) -6 29.0 2100 aul -4 29.5 22001/ 0-1 ale <9 27.3
Av. BF 6 28.9 Av. mal 76 29.5 Av. .6 28 mooed:
May May May
0300 4 71 «30.5 +=0300 sos A 72 30-2 0300 .3 =7 30.0
0900 oe 30.7 0900 te -4 30.4 0900 -6 27) M2Be 7
1200 ae -1 30.7 1200 ',4 30.6 1200 eal =6) S0:3
15002/ al = 30.4) 500 33) “3057 9 S500 a 230) S0EG
1800 2 30.8 1800 -4 30.6 - 18002/ fas 500
2100 ast +2 30.5 2100 -2 30.8 2100 -4 E2989
Av. 5) AIS s0s6 | AVE pe 735 00LG AVs 3 -6 29.9
June June June
0300 0.1 74 «29.5 0300 ae 79 29.0 0300 ou ae aeee
0300 42: -8 29.0 0900 -7 29.3 0900 ait Pee ouaai
1200 -8 29.2 1200 eal +3 29.6 1200 395 2981)
1500 ol sBy eeScdem. 2500. ail ~.-)29-6) — 1500 1.0 29.0
1800 -3 29.7 1800 +9 29.1 1800 1.4 28.6
2100 0.1 ron eon. | 2100) 120 VON 228.8 C1O0N a 1, Qos a
Av. Ee FOR SeotAn /AVS aa Be, ENG ale ae)
July July July
0300 au Bre aT 1.6 28.5 0300 0.4 ao 4 Zoe Lue eeso) SOsOUmmOnt 4 a .6 PiSMMeess.
0900 4 -9 29.7 0900 eal 2 -9 1.8 28.0 0900 a5) a eG) 2 Opene7e5:
1200 2 -9 29.9 1200 ak as) 2 1:0 29.4 1200 gil .2 =3 wi) 26) 128el
1500 Bil -8 30.1 1500 cal ppt Se ers ABST aI) ql ort 2 BE) a aS
1800 3 1.1 29.6 1800 2 $2) 1123). 29235800, 2 4 2 17 | 2877
2100 <6 1.0 29.4 2100 2 -2 1.8 28.8 2100 “al -6 Sr Meneses PEs
Av. 4 TLyeosl AVE at =a = Pipe Lee ice Bay 2 2 6 sey egies
August August August
0300 BT mal 2 77 29.9 0300 aD 4 1.3 2.1 26.9 0300 a 72 aul Some SOE
0900 Bl <1 1.7 29.1 0900 a -8 1.1 1.6 27.4 0900 ea) 7, BOLSieer-&
1200 aft -3 30.6 1200 is 28) U3) 929-0) 200 au al -3 1.6 28.9
1500 or -7 30.2 1500 Fal “3 -9 29.7 1500 4 TE en ELS}
1800 ay -3 30.6 1800 pal 22) 710) 2928718 A800 ot -6) 30.5
2100 aa -8 30.1 2100 au Ss -8 29.8 2100 oT -2 22) 1.4 29.1
Av. ze SSpRSONL Avis Re oa umes © Lars au = ine slg Le)
See footnote at end of table. =
130
Table 30.--Visibility distance by hour of day, and number of days per month in sach distance class--Continued
fd 7aRN-#R)
GALENA GULKANA HOMER
Time Visibility in miles Time Visibility in miles Time Visibility in miles
of os S)iGomajes a = oe of 0- Sls) dje= = one of 0- 3/fl6 1/2- 1 - 3 -
da. 1/8 -3/8 3/4 2-1/2 6 T+ day 1/8 -3/8_ 3/4 2-1/2 6 T+ day 1/8 -3/8 3/4 2-1/2 6 T+
April April April
0300 0.1 0.6 1.4 eTs9 0300 0.6 0.4 29.0 0300 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.0 1.1 27.5
0900 Ost 220° 2.2 (27.38 10900 2 2 29.6 0900 1 +3 6 1.2 27.8
1200 =e -6 .7 28.5 1200 4 -2 29.4 1200 nal if 7 28.5
1500 1 ne) -7 29.0 1500 2 29.8 1500 1.1 -9 28.0
1800 7-6 «A «29,0 1800 2 -1 29.7 1800 4 9 28.7
2100 -8 8 28.4 2100 2 4 29.4 2100 2 1 2 :7 8 28.0
Av. 1 -6 9 28.4 Av. 3 2 29.5 Av. 1 aI a if 9 28.1
May May May
0300 0.1 -4 “2 30.3 0300 ar a 30.7 0300 1 e aE 4 50.2
0900 pul Ar 3 30.4 0900 O21 ol ac 30.6 0900 4 50.5
1200 2 .1 30.7 1200 or aa +1 30.7 +1200 1 2 30.7
1500 le ae 30.7 1500 2 30.8 1500 al 30.9
1800 eal “2 30.7 1800 1 30.9 1800 ok -s059
2100 +341 30.6 = 2100 +1 30.9 2100 1 30.9
Av. ol we. a 30.6 Av. ape eal 30.8 Av. 2 30,7
June June June
0300 mal ok “6:9 29 28.7 '0300'2/\021 0.3 -6 27,0 0300 2 3 at 6 2 28.9
0900 Fede le) 28.4 0900 ol 29.9 0900 3 ppt 29.6
1200 4 a) PASE 1200 30.0 1200 1 x) 29.6
1500 ob 1S af 28.9, 1500 30.0 1500 +1 29.9
1800 +2 ao) 20 28.5 1800 30.0 1800 72 29.8
2100 wilt 728i 2859 200 30.0 2100 1 2429.5
Av. =a 73 9 28.7 Av. a ie Oba AY. 1 L 2 29.6
July July July
0300 4 75 ne a) EC) 0300 ol ai a) -2 -6 29.9 0300 6 3 2 1.2 28.7
0900 -6 Lele div6: 277 1.0900 pal 6 30.3 0900 pel 3 6 30.0
1200 75 10 36° 328.9 _ 1200 6 30.4 1200 4 30.6
1500 A 12) LA 28.0 1500 ol 4 30.5 1500 28 3 50.4
1800 a 4 -6 1.5 28.4 1800 eal -7 30.2 1800 3 G6 30.1
2100 ak -4 ne OumliG 279° 2100 ol -8 30.1 2100 Pe 3 8 29.8
Av. 3 3 DOM 1. Se S2SL Aye ai 6 30.2 Av. 1 va 2 T 29.9)
August August August
0300 ear a TGP 292 0300: a 3 1 i] 3 29.8 0300 6 3 6 3 8 28.4
0900 a 4, 1.6 28.9 0900 1 ol 3 30.5 0900 al 1 ol 1 7 29.9
1200 me) 8 29.3 1200 eL 30.9 1200 1 1 3 30.5
1500 5 36) 172929" “1500 av 30.9 1500 3 -4 30.3
1800 4 .2 30.4 1800 1 30.9 1800 2 1 -6 30.1
2100 4 1.2 29.4 2100 2 30.8 2100 a1 1 3 2 6 29.7
Av Dam O NM: OSS ya Avis 1 =) 2 30.6 Av 1 1 2 2 -6 29.8
_ ILIAMNA KOTZEBUE LAKE MINCHUMINA
Time Visibility in miles Time Visibility in wiles Time Visibility in miles
of 0- S/lG=a/ = aa he of 0- 36 Uj2- 1-- TS of 0- 3/l6wad/e= l= oa
day 1/8 _-3/8 3/4 2-1/2 6 T+ day 1/8 _-3/8 3/4 2-1/2 6 T+ day 1/8 -3/8 3/4 2-1/2 6 T+
April April April
0300 0.2 0.2 0.9 ean 26.6 0300 o.1 0.3 ONT. U2) ..2.9 24.8 0300 0.1 0.2 0.4 Ong 28.5
0900 cal 4 at 1.3 27.4 0900 .2 2 Tak Tee 258 one, 0900 A 9 28.9
1200 al uy -8 -9 28.1 1200 ee “2 a V8) 14 Oni 1200 ne aye 29.1
1500 0.1 4 6 alent 27.8 1500 4 ae) 1.4 1.4 25n9 1500 a 6 29.3
1800 ols 4 1.5 -8 27.4 1800 3 “4 a Wes ee AAS 26.6 1800 2 4 29.4
2100 wl el -4 line 1L2ee 2720! F200 3 -6 1.7,°1.8 25.6 2100 au «2 29.0
Av. alt ma 3 9 1.2 27.4 Av. aa 3 Bie VEAL Oy ee5c7 AV 5 ere
May May May
0300 ol! pl apt -8 ad 29.2 0300 A 4 no aces) 27.5 0300 0.2 alk ep ae 6 29.8
0900 ie A 30.1 0900 ol +2 4 14 1,3 27.6 0900 4 30.6
1200 ab ve 14 30.3 1200 -1 “ib ny pls eae) 28.5 1200 a ab 30.8
1500 Eat 1 -3 30.5 1500 +3 72 7 29.8 1500 el 222) S07
1800 oe sul 30.7 1800 ne +2 4 4 29.8 1800 23 30.7
2100 ce ate 30.4 2100 eal ne 4 8 4 29.1 2100 4 30.6
Av. pee 3 4 30.2 Av. 2: a2 4 8 a:) 28.7 Av. ok a! 30.6
June June June
0300 a] od i) +6 -6 28.2 0300 af aL 14 1.1.6 27.1 0300 Bia ed ao
i 0900 oak +3 8 28.8 0900 al wa. 4 6 oT. 27.1 0900 <2 dx} 28.9
1200 pal -3 29.6 1200 el a) de 6) 27.8) 1200 Fal nce Ore
1500 alt Ere) 1500 ol Ae} +3 fe) 4 28.1 1500 ai} 29.4
1800 -3 29.7 1800 4 ak +6 -6 .3 28.0 1800 12, 329.8
2100 -6 29.4 2100 2 6 8 6: 4.7 27.1. 2200 mOLe Leone:
Av 1 2 4 29.3 Av +3 72 5 a0 Sime e700. Av. ol Oe Son
July : July _ July
0300 ee 4 8 BYE 2.2 25.7 0300 4 2: oe 1.3 1.2 27.6 0300 4 ol el -3 2.1 28.0
0900 oak “4 aR) 2.0 27.6 0900 =; ott -8 1.2 28.1 0900 i ee GABAA as sreh heal
1200 aa 5 162 29.4 1200 ar 20 8 29.0 1200 ads el 1.0 2956.
1500 at ia 1.1 28.7 1500 set fy 129% 29.0) 1500 a) met) oO ed!
1800 oul 4 1.0 29.5 1800 1 pd 2 cong lat ac oer es SLCO0, +3 7 30.0
2100 sak ak rie 8 29.3 2100 ne atk ah -8 mth 29.1 2100 al 22 all 30.0
Av. el. al aed 8 1.4 28.4 Av. =: ol -3 -8 1.0 2seT. Av ae at Eyes almab 29.5
August August August
0300 at -2 3 158 3.1 2575: 0300 ae aut 3 8 2.2 27.4 0300 el 2 .6 6 29.5
0900 1.3 Lag, 27.8 0900 re 1:0, 2.0 27.8 0900 ak ol «4 30.4
1200 ol 2] ee 28.8 1200 onl CM erat) 27.6 1200 al. .2 6 30.1
1500 at pak ale 1.9 27.8 1500 2 -4°1.9 28.5 1500 rae +1 30.8
1800 “a iO) “9 1.4 28.3 1800 +4 6 1.4 28.6 1800 a ail; 30.1
2100 eile +3 1.4 rk 28 2100 rt ale 28.8 2100 oe 30.3
Av. aul 72 ne But} OTE. Av. 22 1 28.2 Av. ma 2 5 30.2
* See footnote at end of table.
131
Table 30.--Visibility distance by hour of dey, and number of deys per month in each distance class~-Continued
{hw 1AKN_5R)
McGRATH NORTHWAY
Time Visibility in miles Time Visibility in nijes
of 0- Ey Ate ae el = oe of 0- 3/16 (-/2- = sr
aay 1/e__-3/8 3/4 2-1/2 6 T+ 6 74. day 2/s- -3/e 3/4 e-1/2 6 T+
April Apri April
0300 0.1 0-8 0-6 28.3 0300 0.2 0.2 0.4 V1 268) T25s5 ~~ 03005 Fo: 0-2 0.1 OLD -umenee
0900 pal -8 1.1 28.0 0900 ail a Be) fete) 56ts)) 20900 =3 e835) (2826
1200 eal P6acdy Pee 1200. 3 <8) el Bigs 27 te elec ou oid. Sth eee AES
1500 a2 26) 1:0) ¥2s.2.- 3500 <2 we “Gia Ye7ee) 500) fin Seok:
1800 za! 23) 8 _ 2828) = 71600. 4 are -6 27.8 1800 “1 ea <3 ed) 2982
2100 2 PAU Gae 282) 2100 eal 3 Uae 27a 2100 a2 ae = 7
Av. Parl SS NOM eats: Wawn ell =o iE ey preg = Ea a -6 .5 28.8
Mey Mey Mev
0300°—«o-2 0.1 aly atemsono, (0300, 76 ag 76 +7 2.0 26.4 0300 ee ai [6m OMmmeos2
0900 etl <a 1.7 8-0 0900 3 12:0 29,7 0900 “2 =a) 262° $2976
1200 et e717 30%2) 2200. eS -9 29.8 1200 Si) 953) 23056
1500 +3 3027) 2500 <6 30s4 21500 2 30.8
1800 -2 30.8 1800 a -4 30.5 1800 -1 30.9
2100 <aiee DumnrcO se 2100 eat A -8 29.7 2100 -4 30.6
Av. “lee chee, Uae ay an a cS De Omneoee: Ave -2- .5 30.3
June June June
0300 eal =a -3 1.0 28.5 0300 3 8 .9 1.6 2.8 23.0 0500 2 pee -1 .8 28.8
0900 1.4 28.6 0900 +3 1.4 28.3 0900 -t .6 2913
1200 -9 29.1 1200 den On B28R9e econ -6 29.4
1500 -6 29.4 1500 <2) 2.0 2828) 72500 “2 que RES abet!
1800 -8 29.2 1800 .2 -9 28.9 1800 -7 29.3
2100 een Ben 29" Ole 2100: 5G: tle. ae) “ekey pane Eee
Av. Senso rok Ole Ave ed ae 2 Bp wemevian kia : +6 29.5
July July July
0300 aa 23 a AE OWs SOT bes OSO0 LES, VEG Tae 2.5 3.4 20.9 0500 «2 +2 «1 69 29-1
0306 re 1.0 1.1 28.7 0900 -8 3.0 27.2 0900 -4 1.5 29.5
1200 oe 2Ad RDU SOO e ae F100 -3 1.9 28.8 1200 oi. -£ .9 29.6
1500 <3 -3 1.4 29.0 1500 -4 1.2 29.4 1500 -6 .6 29.8
1800 73 4.1.3 29.0 1800 -4 1.6 29.0 1800 oie n5- <on
2100 Si 2 Ae as PE alae) ou Lisi Bo y-8) eet00) 24.8 29.8
Av. = eS) SGN 2UMI2BTaY GAVE vs =3 aD cir be aie, diva BE -> .8 29.6
August August August
0300 ai 2 1.1 2.4 27.2 0300 i) 1207 aes 2.2 4.8 20.9 0500 +4 +2 5 -4 .8 28.7
0900 val -9 2.1 27.9 0900 ail 250. 2Snyi e512) 0900 only SC
1200 Ea (i pale ppt STPAfoYe) 13. 329" 2778) 2200 2 264 S052:
1500 s2 des) 2955) 99500; 2S: 1222) 22775) i500 -8 30.2
1800 -3 1.7 29.0 1800 os -8 2.1 27.8 1800 oe a es
2100 =9 1.6. 28.5 2100 aul “5 1.5 2.6 26.7 2100 8 30.2
Av. ar ~6ae8) webes "Avs ae = ) Vom s9ouee6rO! | Av. a aw 2 .8 29.8
SUMOT TANANA UNALAKLEET
Time Visibility in miles Time Visibility in miles Tine i
of o= 3/6 —-1/2= D= 3 of 0- 3/i6 “1/2- si 3 - of o= r 3=
day 1/8 _-3/8 3/4 2-1/2 6 TH day 1/8 -3/8 3/4 2-1/2 6 7+ day 1/8 2 6 ue
April April
0300 0-2 1.6 1.6 26.6 0300 Orciataimeseee6; (OS0Dmros 4 ied pNOCommeTaL
0900 s65 isa, “i28e0° 30900 0.1 .3°* .8-~2828 0900 zu, 23 EE 1. TOTES
1200 -8 1.0 28.2 1200 et t2°"a0) -28t7) 1200 An a AS -6 -6 28.3
1500 0.1 1 £9) dled) 42728) 91500) at .150% p 27.9)" 91500 2 -6 -9 28.3
1800 cB -4 1.4 28.0 1800 -4 29.6 1800 aa al suk 1.0 +5 28.5
2100 al ESO Seer oe gelog: WULIeES APeSeG 2700 4 4 NS Ome Te9
Av. 2 Bp dvietan Ave 720] By 29k0) Ave a 22 =D 8 78 27.9
May Nay May
0300 0.1 zal 3 1.4 1.4 27.4 0300 0.1 ali Tol aay mesOrL 0300 2 -5 UF Olea ONES ES)
0s00 sil! -8 1.0 29.7 0900 sl 9828) ©3508. Voso0 2 at 2.53 «21-0 28:4
1200 pal 4 -7 29.5 1200 tf) S0*S wt e00. = 4 -6 29.9
1500 .9 -3 29.8 1500 «t, 22") 3057, 500 2 -8 Ser Lif
1800 4 up 8 29.6 1800 ail! 3 30.6 1800 a) =e ae el Se AES
2100 As eSiwed eOOVo ne LO0, eS S7S0F6) BELO: =o 2 4 -4 1 29.6
Av. 12 18 .9 29.1 Av. S12; esi SOlS) WAWS a 22 2 S17 -6 29.2
June June June
0300 52 z9 76 28.5 0300 a: 72 1.4 28.5 0300 2 ES =3 Us Olea Ommeoreo
0300 aa +3 29.6 0900 aL el or) 26st. OS00 pat ail oi 8 au ee
1200 od! -1 29.8 1200 22) V2) $2826; 4200) ot .3 a) -6 28.2
1500 4 29.6 1500 o£ 2577-22629) $1500) git cal 2 .3 -7 28.6
1800 -6 29,4 1800 ol -1 > .9. 2859° 1800 cal 2 2 ah EY
2100 2 «729.1 2100 ea! slew egto) FeTOO a2, cal 2 sf sine Bea
Av. ze 3 29.5 «AV. ail tau dedpm 2ee6) Ave eal aa! 22 8 76 28.2
July July July
0300 a2: z9 6 TES Met Oro hos rD 03500 Sat, aul! 2.2 1.3 28.35 0300 zal =o soi, bri
0300 al laa) §29%e- 90900 4 39 e822 eg BO900 <0) 6) 528-6)
1200 -9 30.1 1200 4 -7 2.1 27.8 1200 a eS AS
1500 at “7 302 1500 aS 9 .9 28:9 1500 aul aul -6 ESeotS
1800 22) 91.3) “2975, 91800 -3 -6 1.7 28.4 1800 2 1 6 Pome
2100 aut «41.6 28.9 2100 2 -6 1.6 28.6 2100 2 orf eee)
Av. .2 a 34 1.4 28.9 Av. -3 -8 25652823 “Ave git =a) atl a bs}
August August August
0300 7) a7, 1.2 2.1 26.8 0300 7) 0.2 es TOjec SST Ae OSOD 53 i ys eee
0900 a .2 1.1 29.6 0900 ail 2 -7 2.6 27.4 0900 sat Vey alge a0)
1200 a 2 9 29.8 1200 1 -6 1.4 28.9 1200 sak cals) ES
1500 1.1 29.9 1500 sa ta ye9te" “i500 eq) = do) gare ES
1800 1 -2 21.1 29.6 1800 -3 30.7 1800 ail 39) eS. (Bry,
2100 .6 2.2 28.2 2100 +1 1.3. 29.6 2100 mi aD 1.3) 1.0. 2874
Av. a: T 4 4 29.0 Av. aul 34s) 29.0 Av. aa! 1.1 Te QS
1/ Minor data discrepancy
Source: United States Weather Bureau coded date.
132
we ©
_
.
;
}
|
|
|
|
Fi
Table 31.--Height of ceiling by hour of day, and number of days per month in each height class
1950-58)
(Av.
BETHEL
Time
of
ANCHORAGE
Time
of
Ceiling in hundreds of feet
Ceiling in hundreds of fest
50-95 96-199 Unlin.
30-49
April
30-49 50-95
10-19 20-29
April
5-9
3-4
1-2
0
da:
3.2 2.7 1.8 14.0
3.1
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
LaST
0.4
0.1
0300
0900
12.7
1.8
15.8
0.2
12.2:
2.7 15.5
8.4
1200
CHL 12.8
8
2.5
14.6
1.3
1500
13.2
14.0
2.0
1800
2.8
i)
uN
13.6
2100
Av.
2.2
2.8
14.7
May
May
dh wo
mow
nua
and
moh
© ox
oor
mao
Coe-omtal]
a st
man
mma
coer)
dtd
sta
+
dq
°
lomome)
Qa90
mad
ood
Ww OD
oNd
aad
rod
cu cu
cu tt
emomo)
Ada
ate
ut 09
~new
too
ad
a
dad
fomome)
foeome
19
ood
9.5
10.7
1.7
1.2
1500
1800
2100
Av.
nae)
10
3.0
2.9
11.6
1500
1800
2100
Av.
6.7
6
13.2
12.1
1.8
3.8 lz.
3.2
11.7
959
11.4
June
June
Si 4.9
3.0
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
9.9
0300
0900
dd
om
1
4.0
Sal
4.6
1.8
1
“2
21.6
7.7 .
8.4 3.9
3.4
4.6
3.1
1.9
1.6
1200
1500
1800
8.0
5.9
12.8
4.2
3.0
2.7
etek
bess?
9.0
“2
10.4
3.5
pie
11.5
1.0
2100
Av.
8.0
3.9
eae
8.9 4.1 11.5
3.2
July
5.0
a)
5.2
July
10.5
1.4
1.6
aL
0300
0900
1.2
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
12 Te
2.1
1.4
on
4.2
3
3.2
4.2
4.9
4.6
6.8
yisou
5.0
3.2
12.8
13.1
3.7
3
8.2
3.2
1500
1800
2100
1200
Av.
o>
-o
2.4
1.9
8
5.6
4.6
9
2.6
3.2
3
5.0
12.2
12.0
2.6
1.7
4.0
5.5
4.8
2.7 arene
9.5
3.2
0
August
st
Au.
Te
4.6
a f
4.2
4
4.6
6.6
5.0
9.7
1.4
1.0
0300
0900
1200
8.4
1.9
2
2
0300
0900
3.2
9.4
2.7
4.1
3.2
1.6 1.0 3.6 11.4
1.0
salt
to
20
3.8
3.8
4.7
4.3
5.4
3.8
4.3
1500
1800
2100
Av.
10
212
11.6
1500
1800
2100
1200
Av.
3
5.6
4.1
Dee
10.7
3.7
2.4
10.8
3.7
4,2
5.4
6.2
10.0
ET.
1.0
4.1
6.0
10.0
3.0
eB he
BIG DELTA.
Time
of
BETTLES
Time
Ceiling in hundreds of feet
Ceiling in hundreds of feet
5-9
of
day
30-49
Unlin.
96-199
50-95
10-19 20-29
April
5-9
3-4
50-95
20-29 30-49
April
10-19
3-4
1-2
(6)
17.6
4.8
3.7
3.8
0.8
0.2
0300
0900
1200
16.8
6.9
0.2
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
19.7
19.6
1.4
LTA9
2.7
5.7
5.0
anak
1.2
1.21
18.7
3.1
3.0
1500
1800
2100
Av.
19.1
1.0
20
2
3.7
4.0
20.0
18.7
ene
3.1
4.7
5.7
1.3
ie)
-8
19.0
3.1
nO)
18.5
May
May
15.6
Oat
3.1
5.0
5.8
0300
0900
1.7 15.3
1.9
10.6
0.1
0300
0900
19.0
4.2
10
18.0
6.8
1.2
16.1
1.0
1200
15.7
eveshi
7.4
10.1
o.1
15.6
3.7
Lad
1500
1800
2100
Av.
13.8
3.2
See
3.6
5.9
Lb
9.7
9.1
1.9
15.8
1.5
<2
16.4
15.6
Av.
June
June
14.4
0300
0900
1200
10.3 1.8 15.8
1.2
2.3
0300
0900
15.5
5.35
4.7
1.2
1.3
Tao
1.3
ne
14.9
2.6
2.0
8.0
ae
13.8
16.0
15
2
2a.
1.1
1500
1800
2100
Av.
13.9
14.8
. 3.2
1.0 .
1.0
1.0
5.4
até
2.7
9.5
15
6.2
16c2
2.1
Av.
12.5
7.8
Gel
July
Let
0300
14.2
3.0
14.4
5
5.0
5.1
5.0
7
5.6
2.0)
1.8
0900
1200
13.6
12.6
2
252
7.5
8.0
9.1
3.1
4.7
BE
1.3
15.6
3.1
1500
1800
2100
15.6
Av.
1.8
1500
1800
2100
Av.
L622
6.9
8.0
15.7
1.3
ce
3.0
12
1.6 16.0
9.0
ie:
nienk
14.8
14.3
August
August
5.2,
shee
0300
0900
1200
9.1
952
8.7
1.3
1.3
1.6
0300
1.4
2.2
3.0
6
15.6
13
5.9
4
5.1
abral
1.0
1.3
2.0
1500
1800
2100
Av.
3.6
3
7.9
10.3
4.8
3.1
1.8
05
12.0
abe
1.9
1800
12.3
4.9
4,8
2.0 re)
272
10.8
2100
Av.
14.0
6.5
1.1
10.2
9.9
133
oO 0 © wf TOAD AWO onotodgrd OHM OM Od V9 OOD wo 5 imevoN ene |e Seles ore. Se anroherer ele:
si amuabars | in be etre gn . SEO Soo . Oreo Soh : alive Ode bite Roe titel ble Pal al ts} 4 c 19 9 < « ninMo Molo Ato won
aaoala S00g0da HAHAHAHA oronodr BOK H ODO FE | ntesetecothere pePapsce | re pou oy eas Aa Bi ort aia Sa De hled ae Silt bo PAG Ss Gata
Veta ela VdVett ada Adeeb atl Aad Addddeada Ss] |oOOnwet alo onoon ola 1 © 19 KY tH wl at 1919 Ht 19 9 9 ta] 19
BD) INNA AA le AdAdd AA AtAdd edd AatAddAade AAdaA AAR?
a
Ar Urlo otno odo st O 1 9 «oO @} oO WOM ot Or OAr~ Oth] a
nto 10 2 1AO OD FAM Q oo Rae elle 2D thr EP cert natal ete esearch reer al a aE ale veal era aha alts
rhea ila Ade a eta ANA de AaNdaaa daAdAaedet Hl bh ooo aa Pe ctu siieatarel Couae| Ive ieee) * i pike aks Wee fiare > | = = Relies use mre aa | les)
fO] 22 12 xt uo st 09] at 1919 9 19 xt 10 [Ht 1919 9 19 19 19] 1919 1 6 <H Cylro tH 10 wo xt st ro] st
oow oly goowoe ofr 2OHOH Wo Otdoorddt roroonla 19 ee [es eye cyan el boy arama NAS es
a jure dicate | re Sis jaie tire . GO KET 30 . Cantor 4 betaine oe bes ral o o 19 19|« 10 o
ro 1 tt © 1010 1 Mio bio 10 06 woo 90H M ow alo oon oo or 1 Cae nen retas | Oy nes taretetonrataes [pic ipeiouimeeetins| Ss Rees een pe Seis aienereurtney | fI
Oo} [to t+ © ot ro] OM ANUNOM|D bio aan wo AOAHOOD Do OM OM wo}
: ire} ddd aad
re)
©
® oO WD Wlo OH st © OF 10 tOM © oO ounnooadrH On nwo blo
oH DeermacnO) i Dee . emcee «leo berel late: Baar y oad ty eyeieleleire ste lee] De o || JooOnmoN Alo Onto In ot aum a ola OAD O + clo deere aale
at AANA le AANA Ammo aria uum da wt sPariiKe Mie Rceh te re se 2 ele sme by ahs | va eee . . ance SUR Da face =|
5 % Q| Jd ddaeaa nAanma ela NVA ale toa a uy MAM Mla
® °
é g
tl o mwoodd|d OoMnwo ayo oOr~nMm a alo annMoonw -Mromorlo % lola
=! b weereias| ke pep ke . SEOs sv Dee 2h eta cebsre bis gtial Pre © INP dt @ cult ott ont!O wl tm orn at} bit et OME - Pla om + tt olh .
S oO deta ala Blache ct da we dad [A BWA dn Adda PA ANA Ada Se MN S| erireretie te tevepare |iRey bal are elh iat rear s Oat D + aye OND so Gro, <1) hws Pom oad Fo
E : g 5 3 : ARE g tapes aye oe Z
7 & 5 S ff ESS = 5
1 BI s =
uw ix x
wn A oronrly round ogo bKoowanr DOWOO HOW mM AM Aol a |>
9 OD, Upkie Gl fio eos Dard) : 2 apeiron nigies Sint) spac tas hee a Peotere nye emicol baa A [ed] [O 9 A colt 1) @ th 9 19/10 or~onn als mM oM wilt t+ Hoot wl
a cm) d a UNA |A Add Adela 1 ad Oto ho Suc moes dl ° Sordi eres fecha etnies | he ohoeie Dehetre
9 i to |O fo} dea
tl ai lA
© = a
" o Oo nuolt m1 OM Yt ora a anad tala mre ord cult S|
Gal oO . rc pcs Ot oo : wih vole tot reytre| are “ih cebye hike crete oie ei imiereWye| bys @ |>) foradea lv How qt a ° aMandmla AMMA Alo
ax] © lol jo
a
ay
a da fo}
o : : bs dq ° a ° ad Ala
S St oo) °
A
cs
2 a °
ios a “ al ° fe o be) qd
8 q fo)
be
®
ay cu ° tl °
= ° : . . .
o S °
3 g
=" lo eoo0 eo000 eoo0000 oeoo0000 eo0000 Sto eo0000 Qg00000 lioacaa00 ea0000 eo0000
wo .le Sooo]: S9o00050 : So000Oo |: ao0000;; SS90000]/; 5 bh} |OSOGCO00]; SOS0050/; OSSoSSO|: IS SS0050|.- BS9G0000|.
° Cars| ees io 0 > Voaqnao > VORuH odo mOoqdnH o> UdaaH a> Sha df |[PAQHO A> MAUHO A> mOadHa dio MD wo d|> BAUNHA d/>
A aielece adage O0dAaaA = COnAAM= COnddAMe OOAAAMe Ge Onl lOOAAAMI4 OOAnAAN|S BGOAAANe SOA AAS OOnAAN|e
S| oO
EB} 4 st
Fe 8 5 oD
2 zea = OOr-rMAlI I~ OM oO Ww | Oo UOHROAD morood! be Ot Hd alt od oun tool Naurh> o1o Tm OOM DIO oorha o|o root hy ro
cl sg] |e aonanaln oOonratneho m xt yt at]ro montwo wlt oHMNMnalay BE] Joon woo wlo 119 9 dd Ft tro EES fk Me ST a OdoOKRo0Q/o oonnre|o
Cy Dl jAANd Aaa And dAd AAA Ad ddd eld Addaddedea AAdn aA Ala dl) tre shee tr Prete = adAadd\da AddAaded Ada dAdla
3 3 &
eI cy [ae ao the MUM O Ht thro dm OOM olo UDR Io Avorari|o A] JA oaodwoadla hmoah olo out nN tly ANOHO HD OH wortto sto
° EO] fro 22 cu xt xt 19 [ro 1 a tt ro |r 9H MM wo wl rd ym ot t]9 et Gy 19 [0 wo] Inn aaaala agaae ala Ost Cy rd 9 9/00 2 A UO NUNAAN dd 5
be D
°
3 rel re}
OD) [ao wm whe UODO + woo artonw ala DO DAD 0 ow Romar ald HB) I~ MAY ofr xt 19M Clo DOHMD Wola OO HO + w/o tain oo wl
5 BQ] fe 2 12 19 10 tht roenaarlo DOOM w ola ono or heey Orr AKAM lo] ftw dt tt tlt ter am wo]o oO — Ol ronorrlo ootnt alo
re}
<
a ie ®
o |o ey
cal a x ONDdt oO HO MOrADOMIY AtAUt OD OG wom WOOO oO] ooo tnohe a yt OoONnr-nrnala tT ODA OL|O 1 9 WO D/H NOM OA MIM it dro O OlD
oO ores re deette [fe apn stapice diel he aire Gees ease Rorlanhetep els bers | [ts pire Qiacige ie leivie,| he 1 apkctriatfeuseie [ie eiereir apcedieneee | he ciniadvemiediebve| ae = eee ee = EO Led fo
° a (8) jAdvaddqn UA Ai Aum |v AAA tA ly nm A cro cut fe JQ] [ro n2 mo tt att 1 Ut tt tf hw wo tlt +9000 wolwo Ia OO 4D wolo
8 e: E
2 3 |o 3
O]4
ic © Ids Ot Oalo AAAUDOHADA woMaNAtO hI aMooNM|U joan aold 2 AAA Ono JJonrmralre eormdoonm bhinditnon wit acd a4 Olo
pal Do jo[ild aa a | a 3 | (rt Blo ANd Jt ala Ada taal EB lolslndaddAld Bl aaa a 3] Ada Blau td lw hw wm HO CUI
© & [a =| 5 5 aI 53 |N\a = 6 5
x 3 < 2 3
v £ 3 <
i s lo oS £ |o
d oA et oronn uit MU Sst OO Gy hw WOOHANAM|S ONRODM® o;t ma AMM wo Ao Gary RHiot ODD tt Ot QM Ait tTROrM dH DONNO WO Ato AH tH
a w 1° ° qd a ANd a Atda Ala Pio Od AMUN AAS Nem mM Aa
a ae ata
< a td
tA
a BAS ud 4 ad fo) UOdd nly Doan vit G @) joumd elie td iq cu cu a toa + 0 who 1 0 1 dt tht
fre} fo) io) Jo * *
st] fa lo q [e) ) ad ro) dq a da fe} d lo
m| |o fe) °
fu a lo IM Ae qd 4 ay qd fo)
da o d °o
bs. dq jO da le}
a 3
a/o aeo0000 ooo0000 ioecaoog00 essgeeo So0000 o eooooo egoo000 loo0000 looo000 Iog990000
He > |ISSOOO0O0]> SSSC050|. SOOdO0]; SSOSOS00]- SSOOC00};: Ale m 1259990). SCOOOCO]-: OSOCOO]- OCoooCO|-: 260000|-
<f-au dl |POqaHm wo A> MOO Oo (> MOU O A) > MOH a > MAQdM a d/> ay ayaa A> maa O /> A MAO A> MAUVH a A> mOAqdn @ d/>
Ble OD! loon AAs COOnAAN|< OOdnAANIS OOAAANIa COAAANIEe Ho COdevAN|e C9OnnAANIe SD OAAAYIe OOddAale CORA AMIe
50-95 96-199 _Unlin.
30-49
Ceiling in hundreds of feet
Time
of
ILTAMNA
1950-58)
by hour of day, and number of days per month in each height class--Continued
(Av.
50-95
50-49
20-29
Table 31.--Height of ceilin
10-19
Ceiling in hundreds of fest
5-9
3-4
HOMER
Time
rroowela oononraly mr aa o alo +orMmoanld ko A © AIH Bl le wona sla mtm aa alo mma tt olay bonadae tah anda
° mice whe ce eeauneSysiienws [os einlaipetie are une} ie So a see Bay signin strana ite os i Py As | sia b
Mami t tls aooNHOlO Amd Wolo IM OD HOO!O moonoan|r se] }Omnnonoe|r YO gy 12/9 UNQYAHOROl”A ANAANAA Aaonndoala
Ad Add ala addadd daddeala dada BSB] ld dd adaAla Add Aad Ald a qd AAR AA al
&
monnaala Ia DMM ~@ Uhio leu Ot OfrO InN 2 © aw ANAOADo Al [tt odanly Re nMortla hMadeado onnreorlo anourords
Sisetee cer eras fe af 4 oe ipeenneir | ie 1 - nhs nigral = icannette|ee
Od Ada fA Hidddd Adaddd alr ddda ae Haddad ©| lana a ala aadvsnala Od 9 9 Oh 8 ahro Auda ala Aaveandala
2
wo
uRadoalo tT tom ania jot h ado rroodha Mr ORO alo HB) It oqo alo haan alt DAARO lM mnooooq|/+ Me AaNnolh
Z : ° Seete re Cah ierailine ithe inastey siete | a fs eae
Bw wis sho oraraala mere ra alo In OOrarlr Ip rata r|> Oo] Jw tt tin fio GEMMA a DOrROAD rorrh oft orrasde
re)
% lo
MADAA Alo ONO HI > oO OY Tr aoa wh} HOAAY Dolo o fe} Jrrdan ans Ot dw afin YHON wD OID + Hoan lo AMUN Vo
a heegiatns he air el Fe a|fe 4 ° Bute Aeieuxeyna|ee | z
tt dt dt LO] MOOOKeIK Worrwoalo ooroon|e lao Ore & OD = S I a tt of Down tls x! 1 Ow |< mtinwoo on It GOor alo
oy
i}
w le
2UOAD MID Sa ota nly tr oraaol tr oA wo hr wolo oAMot sto D lal fur tau clio XROOX lo bt HOn ow to todhn tlo odmeoania
nas posters ues ce Tesugiubeat ce cs |jie r a Fal bh A ne
daladdddadd lua a ala HAA ddadela Adda lad eladaddala J |loldJb ad dada dd da AMM daly aadaaad ala
4 @ >| v S [ala >] o DI od
& >| s d FA 5 he 3 rs d a
a 3 is 3 £ a S 3 G} FA
< a K K ie cal 6 B Ss
oowonola NUODHD Hu to Ot x colar lomo, wWxnon ro A IAL fomnanals rr Hoato wHon dalo UmMdAaNnol~ zloonmuoalo
anes alae as 1 shoei teiieinrerse| ce Ret Rarer ha sonsicw: oes] ata ein arate ; sae
aeaaaala AN aA Ala aad a laa dal hd Aa alla w to! Jo d da AANA aA AMAA
y
ai
|
ono alo lo HM O19 IO dO Ato lo OM Oh aM mun aoao o |e} INAdAa fea at Aas matdad jaw rnANAA AO lonmantaly
3 A aa Vda a Heddddd SO jel 1d dea da
ad Vara 4d fo) aa a I~ oO da jo lo UA te H/o ~~ i oO ea all
is a Sapte] fe i 3 or) 4 ie Sie i spray aivaetan | ae H 3
to} bel o
d ee) Ue dq fo) Ge) qd Sad A id Re) Ala a} ja ° cu °
. : hy 3
° 3 a] jo
6
d ° nu fo} cu ° S a ° a ° qd °
au 3S o = :
fo) a 3
eceoe00 liooo99000 loacea900 lIoaQg000 liooa000 © eoc000 Si0:.O10 01.0 eooo00 loeoeao00 lioeaa00
ISSSSSO0|-- OS0000|: ISSOS00|;- ISSSS00|- ISO SOSGO|- 8/8 SSodooO|- lottewowono be] it SSsgoool. SSSS00|;: SOS09000 Xe)
maaAUND > ess frase ber 2 OOO 4d] P SBD SCA TICS Be eh rm ONO a> du od pepe pes hes Tt| ete te fish ese er tO QO O FA > SSSI Tues ic Bee i rMmAMN oO >
SOnAAMe O0OdAAN|a OOAAA|S OCA AANE OOK AANMa Mees] loodaaale eoodAnale O0OdnaAnMS SOodAAdla OCAdAnAAIS (9A)
lom mm told HOdntaala MU AL 2 Ww SI cols anaroolm wAarkralo El lo wm aaolm tt Ha aAOolO onwondadts mn O© OM wo moawostala
iid a rouerd ateattatcr d sieges 4 watz ° : | BS mbonie a Se ° . 4 . °
r Qy 2 QO ra} ooomCd|o Odddedtald Hon A ROROAO Ss] Jtonnr ooo YOnK a or matow tlt AAANAAHA Oonroor|>
ddddddd Hdd dala Adddadala Hdddddad a dda 5B) ldddddede Haddad ediet dAadddela daddada
&
lo HO Ht CUD youone|a DARADOAH arr oOo ro ADO” IO mr] [One ola aa to olo Ut anonrdto Ootad mls wWonornol+
Fe aa acebir stera lata | ie siiwiael a aheeie |e : 1 i miata isjietine| ps * ° : . sae
Sard A AAaA ANNAN AA ANVAANNAlY doadddeadd Hddaddddd 2 ddAdaddda Adda eA A cu HD quire tan to 9] dauaanala
wo
+ qonor ala OrOdAANID Lar aade AHO @ ao aU Noo tu OB) ta daaala MMOS Ol! mmnrnma wolo YTODMOO|D tah aly
abeeliisiaarsts|ice cree lapeeeiheee te c : ° +| = 47 alee Sotoem cert 4 Waimea enrellizs etry set ielewaieral Ts oar bs
tO Ht tt 09 ra}ro Oooronu tho OGOOu OO worr colo orurwwlo oO} [xi td als stiles 19 60 th tt tl ot wt 1 xt Ol Hi +O Olt 0H oO tH ww oO}
Pre)
% lo
lanononlo +onHoalm mt 4am of hroaoror+ jo ANA MIO o |x Ar AAAH]o ot ot 4 Old Ad~aocay Hn dam]! UROHBRODO
rs er es 4 fs siuiaieicwtengere pie ed A 5 = + i 4 BS teh 4 = a es 23 * aie one
onorrwlo AAHROD w/o rraraala rororel Sododdd al fe} moiaadala UNdAaalo anaanala Hay 19 19 09 9/9 19 Ww]
“4
°
w Io
AM AAY A] moqur ono mACOteNHA mooNNNMHd ronmoxrtalo 2 lal joundqroalo aonMmotal+ oton tha CANADA ARODHO|M
aMsantalieat ae | pl A ey thee a be speiwigrsiieinetas| = aqitinetneh “et <|ine Site fe vel cece] ce h hve ddehavige ote =|liew star ieeomalneinas| We hs ey end [od ote zt eo lays cise . * 4
diaud da cla adage jaded qd Att tebe tet a 5 lofdJd ddddald Add dA Adddaea {a ANNUUM AU | fo co 9 Hr0
lal oOo
5 g 3 3 : Z| |e z| : d :
< 3 56 6 E al o|* 6 5 &
ro WO HO jm AWVorolo Ado tn tly ONNAwDLIO alourant|o> cia dqoeneodda Ker woala wwononalr HEtOd dt alanaanaala
lab i iJ A Aaa da qd da 0 19, adadaaa Ad ANA AeA ANdAA d NMMA AAA xt tis fal alts
a
od
a
tot no olo Ma odd d 2 10 dq ” a dd dad ala 3 |o tt Am la OO 4H Oro ARORA] Aatdhe|+ HOON Odlt
: é ° : t 1 ate 4 «Te . :
2 Chol ldddd “da ANNA Ald NANA Ala anaaddaa G8 Hal a alo
ANdA AA ov) dq qd CV Me) Von tod mAald S| lato dedi ornenmad Hotorala othr arh|o haddaneia
3 rm! |o da dq
a Pe el Ce) d qd ~H dd a dla al jae oa a AAW Aol co Qt th colw mHoONMnaaln md ANA
: ° ° ay Y B u ie See oitiaiiaatt-ve| Eve aie woe nal re
3 a} Io d
qd ° q ° da ° q ° d °
fo) a 2 fot
lioco000 loc0000 liocag000 weo0000 eo0o000 al, looMeMeme) loce000 lio2Q9000
SSoSS5O|. ISSSOG0|.; SoSSo00]- SS0S0550|-; ISSOS90).: fle 8S8sssa. 888sséai. s3sss¢ea.- SS8S888.- 885380).
Maw d> OU oO > moaqmna > DOU oO > B2UH® l> 5laas DY © cil > aye o> aqyeods DAWdHOD A> aqnarn>
COA AAMe COnt nd ANIa SOOAA AMS SOAAAMS COA AA sla onl lO Ona AMS COnAAMe COnenAAG lo On AAAs COdnAnAMIS
“| Oo © MM © ~o]~O lo OO «© 0 1O|h Oh © O © cw] sK th 19 0c 19 Pl} oarootria ro lo DOM OM hr 19 OF OH Cy st Be [sit
fe allel efter Deis | |v ace pment iean| ae aluraive haa tralate |e sivemrebietaleite| ie aioe soe elete nar | te eine pela necaeatehate | Sor ole hal uenty (ita
8 wo 0 HO) OO O&M Ol 1 OO b O colt 1 od st CO COLO DO H'O|9 oO «OO ~@ M{H © Ot mith
= e Ps
B s
Fell | Pac RCAC SIEICORTS TO SIS) Epa CACIGICHCA I = SCC rat RY aS Cooma ri [2 ere ey 01 04 19, cy 0% oy
OP etch Meter AA et ClO dette et elle rit et et [rt At A ellet ko AMI ae ai al a a a rifal
D
wo 1
OH) lo m 19 Kw a @ Ir 0 A OM «—] A st © co | ID xK 1 ef 19/0 © 19 bt {co o HOM A 0 lo At © 0 10 | Oy t= be bIsh O10 Ah tO & Ble
air chtahueionee| pre! peepvensetreniel ie ebneienaatseeye| we <i eeu atTemnaDes| ine ehsetiehe ‘abe bral ke f pieswice papa eaee'| Ne emma praise xe Xe epdlapatattu teres |e pabninvatie iiauate |e
BQ] ro t2 19 19 st 19} 10 19.19 19.10 Koh HO sh 0 10 st CO}stt ss 1010 uw] tt 10.10 sO Coho fet COOKE ol Onaaa ol 1010 Fo lO 19 18 16 © @ «lO
Ie]
rt yo
wo | w |
eit) fico aed 192 OO rt alin DM oO © OM w]e OFM MO Hert © 0 P90 © ri}io ols] |ooums ADAM Ho rio oo 1 st 2 O sHloy
mietahete peepee tie] Ere Oa 20a) (a onde peters priotrs|ire shy chveriebuoira| tie opmatmebueee bral ice 1 Oe adi shiebiniareyhal he cpiieiih ee cep pba neesmn |e:
oe] SK tO SHO x SH ro] si LO st DO B19] co win & Ot w}o © 0 & bh 10/c lO Mth © th wlwo Bula 19 N10 12M M119 19 10s 110 © 10 4 0 OM @ |
‘ ta aa |e
3 3 3
a
on d\n
+" p | tc (Oe St ta] Oh el & tao Orth xt Ola 19:19:10 ei Of
is) 5 19} Jaa 2 a cya 1909 10 19: 1-8/9 A 918 HO CULO A A 19 10 OY CUO
' 3 A % bo 3 ®
rs} “ a rl
i a als 4 | 3 3
A AIM WAS es Snicmis gale Tease ric Te nOmic na eines mote reecoale 5
2 a 1219 st rd 09 19/0 A tO SH OY tft ASE a ef [to A sO st QU] to A 1 st 09 CUT Aad a le
2
C tet
a Bia] Ateaona iuerwedr jraydaule leanqeae maqaqaain mame fytawariy learaa mia (rio oy
= wf JOU et et elle eet clet (vine) ae 191019 et et cute 191090 CY cua fo) Ae elle et moat
a
°
a
2 Ms] [Ne Ce Kal) t= 3 cif tO et et oei[st OO rt ol monde alo wl fou ° ro) mola Ord rt i) ha 10] maa st lou
GI | Id al et fa d | |o rl
a
re}
8 hu bd ql cl bod q a te a Or cq dq pall o cd N (cs “ et (=) ip) ial al 19 et o reff 9
a ri| jo cl a it rl °
‘
a
a ie 2 Is 9 IA ye ite an lie rf ry rt e
# 3 ‘ 3
a
cI Fl A
ols |e lmaagaaq0 laca9000 loea90000 Qa0000 lOo00000 eg00000 e0000c
6] BAe. pF 885386 : R99S90),; SB0000|- SBS0000|. S55000]. ale » ISS8S88S88]. Rise cer aw eats ies S8ssesés. 38 30
ilapd ws @ beat eC Bet ecets as Hast Ha peptes} tat ashes ha | RO EODE CY) a LO tt Be Pe Tae ey Oat Phd G @ BG 10.O A] > MO QO O ril > moO 10 © Al > a
ce o|Z4le ong Ord et et ag OOrret Va OOn nA NI a OOM re Ala oo chet beg lb On” oonaa ala SONA aS pet ETE [len
o| 1
al a
yp i<e)
eles tI fl oD
re | eked rf] JO VD @ © riley 190 HO 1 MICO ot 0 oH A] ble OD et a) st o lor | © Ht cw wl ©1010 WM OlO Om Yo O rio How volo rt
ches spishyeyeiite late | Se oauentebxei neice) ie oiige me)ute late dr o| xe Be enfaitel seprente|se ES weenie aciebra| rs so aixeiuedseliae|ice eive pp eles poe cel ite ote jaelniemsenme| ire,
AP [te Ooh & hl ay st a Oo ay tp Of OMOr0 oo Ore OM | tm 19 lo {10 OO et etiet on OrOale anaqa a ala
a Bl fetetetet et eijet Retielietieali rll ey aac ae ae B] fete atet a eae ret AA ada A [ed SS SSI
By
8 8 &
4 Hrd) KRING SICAL a ACCS Fal) SCC BIS I hepial eh a el SH be rl |yetria@lt lermariaie [ye@o or alr
g ie NUM et OM et HOM CO CY 1D ]t0 tro A st rt UA to MM et OO o 19190919 CULO 91919 AY 9 19/19 sf 19 1900 Ht] ie) H
he o>
f=
6
£4 is 10
mn MON WON OW UN onm oO Niet ont YO Met tO WOM Ht RHO I 1 CY 18 IO} oy 7000 0 rl co 1 1 CO xt CUO (ay OADO* Al et 12 Ort & tlh
‘agoapuewpecepes| ie apacapeeleeireyuxe | ve eas uemeyee| ee eViceieelaeizelioel fie ema vesuemenca| ire ‘i Mactaaetes tien atute lis Shunk sisestietns | ice elie etry ys [aie euetaeltaicis ie | kee
Oo} fio 1 19 19 19 WO] x OM AHO wl OrFanrolo OP Orda 00090 0]M 010 19 © Sho on qd Mm OO ri glo room o Mylo
rs) ret ct daa qi aa ret 8 SES = ARTE} rt ta Sieliclet a
” 1
@ In ®» Io
@ IN] [r2aaoa alo mmo to ale U0 HOO wm hr 2 tO 10 SH tO CY Ob be oft @ [a] fo 1 © wa st tO coh xt cla xt xt O & Ohio hin OMA
z ehrebzelienenias| re ehunieleie(neigce| ie epaewlehselxenen|icn Sezuasanenevns| [be cia uteneepieace | ice H Se Sr Shen lin apes srelnatrepael ps petty pened hp a enSee
aa JQ] [te eu st cu cure ry st tt st ro} 8 © 10 9 QUO 1210 HO Ht ot] tt 10:19 P10 1 }to ta [Ql [te ww ew alla 10 HO x10 Cat AL 8 10 9 A CuILO an wo
fe m t
° oO
°o
uw uw
* 3 lo S ley
tal P Ia] [tO a 12 Olw Yowna ann 19019 wo Ot oO CY la 2 lal jo w tt tole COON AD KO rt oO HY QU] m2oO00M M4 mooNt HO
A i shpeprenve mepse| re ehyerpe tia sgeare| ie apnensegretremcs| ine shJepkeiietie elite h Ariat aoe iret ba ole ine! mieateusel me Onis qevtetreanel ie chie iedrebcettel| (ie cine seete tire aie| ize
‘a Diol Jnr vale AN et [et Art rt al AVM Me lo 0 (=) Oe ro a aAonfoiad a Aetrt ch Pl et arrt qd
2H § [oils 9 > 5 aves f g i 4
' & f a E} 3 a ny 3] 5 4 by)
¢ te for a A lie) 4 lo} a h uct 3
a wt rf] [rita xt sto Ofc Ue Ow t O10 yoo an te Ot hm oH rt At) aor oly tm © 1) Vy CO}IO th © © st ]O Mm Ort 0 0 sao 1019 © 19 whe
epicmicphevrejse| se shiek veiien eruel ie sass restate sre| are Hotere at 1 Bak Vers tori [2 aforintare tats Pie tina) te pas elgerray rete] se Spueerepxe imei bore shu vores eieenme| ire
o Whol [AeA aA ete odeae et cade AO rtet fou Mlol lod det ae
a |e afl boa
Cy m fal
iS ted fal
J IA] MAdd dela KO st ot a ad let th ala Mme wlwo 5 |% xt © © 12 wo lO AHoaAr [0 set cq st a et rif 0
wo oO a wo oO rl:
* a rio a ° Adee cq “t eiearet ° art rt Aa fal
: 4 cd ° ° enxeieune : 1 ; s Die Mia tee .
9 i=} Lie) oO
ay et ° a ° aed ° ol det ° ct ° rt ° a °
ri] |o il des . : ° °
et i=) ret o
° ee bl jo °
so] <j
Bi =
Blan gsssgel. igsessel. |gessgel. igsessea. isgesse Els. el iegiesesl. lsseeeel. pees geseal. igsesss
. . . . ’ : . . a0
Of ow @ BO gio B Al; BO oi @ Fil = A QD oH > 3 & G8 & Fe OYA o cil > Sau Bl Baaneas BARD 12 qh 1 OC oO Al >
slp ov O0OnAnA MIA fame} elt alaq oo aet Meg oOnrtrina OOnr er ala Zl od) lOOrdeiala oOndrtrialha 90rr oor sO Ld
Unlio.
14.1
14.9
15.9
14.8
12.8
14.1
14.2
12.4
14.2
13.5
10.0
10.9
ansik
11.0
11.8
11,6
ded
5.4
6.0
5.6
5.5
96-199
lve
1.8
1.6
2.8
1.6
1.2
1.8
1.2
1.6
1.8
1.5
a0
2.0
252
1.7
50-95
5.7
4,2
5.0
Tel
6.2
6.7
Te2
7.3
8.0
6.0
6.6
6.9
6.6
5.8
5.0
5.9
5.2
6.7
5.8
6.2
5.7
4.6
RE)
4.0
3.2
3.1
4.0
4.1
3.8
3.6
3.1
4.6
4.9
4.3
4.9
5.0
4.6
6.6
5.6
4.8
5.2
6.7
6.0
6.2
feeds
30-49
--Continued
1.2
4
a
2.3
1.4
1.7
Cul
4.0
3.7
3.8
2.3
3.8
3.5
4.7
4.3
6.4
)
April
May
July
August
5.1
4.7
3.9
4.8
June
3.0
QL
2.0
2.5
5.2
4.7
4.7
8
Ceiling in hundreds of feet
1.1
2.0
1.6
2.3
al
ol
el
el
0.1
el
UNALAKLEBT 5
1950-58)
Time
of
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
0900
1200
1500
1800
Av.
0900
1200
1500
1800
Av.
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
(Av.
18.0
Drei:
18.7
16.9
18.1
18.0
17.8
15.8
16.3
14.0
12.3
13.9
16.1
14.7
13.9
14.2
11.4
11.7
13.0
14.2
13.1
14.1
11.3
10.7
nlbieeey é
13.2
12.3
8.9
9.0
8.8
8.3
10,0
2.2
4.6
3.2
2.5
3.3
3.0
3.4
3.4
1.8
2.8
3.1
3.3
3.4
3.0
3.4
1.6
2.0
3.6
3.4
2.7
2.2
2.9
2.6
2.1
50-95
5.2
5.1
5.7
4.9
Geil:
Tek
8.2
7.9
7.0
9.6
9.1
8.9
8.6
6.8
6.6
6.2
6.4
7.2
8.2
6.9
8.4
6.3
7.6
9.7
922:
30-49
1.6
3.2
2.4
2.0
2.0
4.8
5.0
3.4
3.0
4.2
3.9
3.8
2.9
2.9
5.8
5.2
3.1
3.1
6.3
2
5.7
5.2
5.5
20-29
April
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.2
2.6
1.8
st
2.1
3.4
3.6
2.9
2.2
2.7
2.8
May
June
Jul
8
3.0
ele
Au
2.1
3.6
Table 31.--Height of ceiling by hour of day, and number of days per month in each height cla
10-19
Ceiling in hundreds of feet
5-9
22
1.2
1.0
A
ot
2
3-4
0.1
0.1
Ae)
0.1
TANANA
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
0300
0900
1200
1500
1800
2100
Av.
d]jo
eyo
Lek:
1.7
3.3
4
4.0
4
1.8
alt
10.0
9.2
2.4
2
1.6
2.1
ol
137
United States Weather Bureau coded data.
Source:
Table 32.--Type of weather by time of day, and number of deys per month in each weether cless
(Ay. 1950-58)
BETHEL
Time
Weather type
Weather type Weether type
i Rein Snow Hail Fog Fogw/ Smoke Thunder- of Rain Snow Hail Fog Fog w/ Smoke Thunder- of Rain Snow Szcks Thunder-
day sleet smoke haze storm Gay sleet smoke _ haze storm dey slest stoke haze storm
April April April
0300 pie E 2.3 0.3 0300 5.2 2.6 0300 0.2 4.6 0.8
0900 +=1.0 2.0 0.6 0900 5.3 2.2 0900 0.2 355 1.7
1200 1.6 1.7 0.6 1200 4.7 0.8 2200 0.2 3.3 1.2
1500 1.2 1.6 0.2 1500 4.1 0.9 1500 0.3 29) 0.9
1800 1.1 1.4 0.6 1800 4.3 1.0 1800 0.3 2.4 1.2
2100 1.2 1.6 0.2 2100 3.8 1.3 2100 0.3 3.0 2.0
Av. 1.2 1.8 «4 Av. 4.6 1.4 Av. a) 3.3 ial
May Mey Mey
2.8 0.2 0.2 03500 257, 2.3 1.4 0300 1.4 1.4 ii
2.2 0.2 0.1 0300 3.0 2.6 0.7 0.2 03900 1.4 Dot 1.0
2.4 1200 3.7 1.3 0.1 1200 1.3 0.8 0.6
3.8 1500 4.7 0.9 0.2 1500 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.2
3.7 1800 5.0 0.6 OLIELOTS 1800 9 0.6 0.3
3.8 0.1 0.2 2100 Orit 0.6 2100 1.4 0.8 0.2
Vv 3.1 -0 sat AV. 3.6 1.4 -0 4 -0 Av. 2.5 =o -6 -0
Juns June June
4.7 0.8 e 050 4.9 0.2 aC) 0.2 03500 2.8 0.2 0.6 0.7 oO.
3.7 0.2 O.21 0S00 6.1 0.2 1.4 0.6 0900 2.4 0.4 0.4
4.3 0.1 1200 5.6 0.2 0.7 0.2 1200 3-6 0.3 0.4 0.2
3.8 0.1 0.1 1500 4.2 0.3 0.2 1500 3.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2
3.7 1800 or 0.3 0.2 2800 a LEY) 0.1 0.3
3.7 0.2 2100 5.0 0.3 0.2 2100 1.8 0.2 0.4
4.0 -2 -0 -0 Av. 5.2 -0 1.0 S) Av. 2.6 -O 5 4 -0
Jul July July
0300 5.2 1.3 0.4 0300 5.9 4.4 0.2 0.3 0300 Ont 2.3 0.1 1.8
0900 4.9 abe 0.4 03900 4.8 3.3 0.3 0900 3.6 1.2 1.8 0.7
1200 44.6 0.6 0.3 1200 «5.2 a7 0.3 1200 3.9 res) 2.8
1500 Beds 0.2 0.3 0.1 1500 5.7 1.2 0.3 1500 3.21 O.4 0.21 ate)
1800 6.3 0.2 0.4 1800 5.8 HEY) 0.4 2800 AIS) 0.7 2.0 O.2
2100 Dic 0.6 0.4 2100 4.8 ig) 0.2 2100 2.8 1.0 2.0 0.2
AV Lise! -6 34 -0 AV. 5.4 2au -0 a) Av. 3.2 1.0 A) 2.9 ye)
ugus% August August
ae 0300 «8.2 6.7 0.2 0500 5.2 3.4 0.1 0.8
1.3 0800 «7.9 ee) 0.2 0900 5.9 2.8 0.2 0.9
ONT 1200 6.9 3.3 oO. 0.1 1200 5.7 1.6 0.6 0.2
0.3 1500 7.6 2.2 0.2 0.2 1500 3-9) 1.4 0.7
0.4 0.1 1800 6.9 2.6 O.2 0.2 1800 4.4 1.2 0.9
0.7 0.2 2100 7.6 2.6 0.2 0.2 2100 oe7 1.9 0.2 0.6
0.8 -0 -0 AV. 7.5 3.9 ul ot -0 Av. 5.5 2.0 -0 -8 -0
Weathsr type Weather types
Fog Fog w/ Smoks Thunder- Snow Heil Fog Fog w/ Smoke Thunder-
smoke haze storm Slest = smoke haze store
April April April
Ose u.2 ere 0.2 0 0.2 3 0.3 0500 0.2 pe) 0.2
0900 0.1 oot 0.3 0 0.2 a 0.2 0900 0.2 2.0 0.2
1200 0.2 1.6 0.2 1 0.3 2 1200 0.1 Onl 0.2
1500 40.2 a2 0.1 i 0.2 0) 150 0.3 1.2 0.3
1800 0.2 ise 0.1 1 0.3 1 1800 1.5 0.2
2100 0.2 1.8 0.1 2 0.4 7 2100 1.8 o.4
Av a ake oz Av == 6 Av. sa 1-8 2)
Mey Mey Mey
0 0.2 ene 0.4 0.2 0300 -6 0.2
) 7 0.6 Pet 0.6 0.2 090% 7 0.2
1200 «1.3 0.3 0.2 2.4 0.5 0.3 1200 4 0.2
1500 a9 0.3 0.2 as 0.2 0.2 150) 2) 0.2
1800 2.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 2.2 0.2 O32 O2F 1800 ie) 0.2
2100 ek 0 0.2 2.9 0.3 0.2 0.2 2100 2 0.2
Av. Lz aeE -0 2.0 -3 -0 ae 0 Av. 1S oa)
June June June
0300 3.6 0.2 03500 PY fi 0.35 0.4 0300 aT, 0.7
ogs00 2.4 0.1 0.35 0900 2.6 0.2 0.35 0900 2.0 0.8
1200 2.8 0.2 0.2 1200 «2.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 1200 1.7 0.7
1500 3.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 1500 2.9 0.2 0.2 1500 1.6 0.8
1800 3.6 bee g 0.2 0.6 1800 3.7 0.1 0.4 0.2 1800 2.9 0.6
2100 2.1 0.2 0.2 2100 3.1 0.1 0.3 @.2 2100 °1.9 0.6
Av. aE) 2 ae ea Av. 229) Su .4 oe Av. 1.8 EY,
July July July
0300 4.2 0.7 0.1 0.9 0300 4.6 0.3 0.3 2 2.0 0.2 at
0900 4.1 0.3 0.6 0900 4.3 0.2 0.2 1 3.0 2.9
1200 2.9 OL. 0.6 2200 3.7 0.1 1 0.2 2.3 0.2 2.6
1500 3.9 0.1 0.7 1500 3.8 0.3 1 0.6 2.9 eal 2.9
1800 3.5 0.2 xtexh 0.35 1800 ee 0.1 zl 0.2 3.3 2.4
220 3.9 0.2 ph 0.4 2100 0.2 i 2.8 2.2
Av 3.7 -3 0 -5 oat Av. 2 El z Sel 2.7 -0 -0 2.4
August August? August
0300 4.0 0.6 0.2 4.9 2.8 0.2 0.8 0300 2.4 0.3 2.6
0900 4.0 0.2 0.4 3.6 1.3 OSL aa 0300 3.2 0.2 2.5
1200 2.6 0.2 3.5 0.6 1.4 31200 2.8 1.4
1500 3.2 0.2 0.4 3.7 0.3 0.8 1500 3.1 0.2 1.3
1800 «3.1 0.2 0.2 4.2 0.2 0.9 1800 3.9 0.1 0.3
2100 = 0.8 4.1 0.2 0.6 2200 5.8 1.2
Av. -5 -0 1 -4 -0 4.0 =9 2 2.0 Av. 3.2 a 1.4
138
Table 32.--Type of weather by time of day, and number of days per month in each weather class--Continued
(Av. 1950-58)
GALENA
Time
Weather type
of Rain Snow Hail Fog Fog w/ Smoke Thunder-
day sleet smoke haze storm
GULKANA
Time
Weather type
of Rain Snow Hail Fog Fog w/ Smoke Thunder-
day sleet smoke haze storm
HOMER
Time Weather type
of Rain Snow Hail Fog Fog w/ Smoke Thunder-
day sleet smoke haze storm
April April April
0300 0.4 4.1 (eat 0300 1.3 0.2 0300 2.4 2.2 1.0
0900 «(0.6 3.3 0.7 0900 1.2 0900 2.6 aaa 0.9
1200 0.4 239) 0.2 1200 0.1 aead 1200 2.9 1.8 0.3
1500 0.6 2.4 0.21 1500 0.4 1.0 1500 3.3 2.3 0.4
1800 OST. teil 0.2 1800 0.3 0.8 1800 2.6 1.9 0.6
2100 0.8 Sg. 0.3 2100 0.4 0.9 2100 2.6 1.8 1.0
Av. -6 Hh ates Av. 72 1.0 0 Av. 2.7 2.0 ole
May May May
0300 1.7 0.8 0.2 0300 «61.2 0.3 0.3 0300 3.2 0.7
0900 «2.3 0.8 O/T 0900 «(1.0 0.2 0.3 0900 2.8 0.2
1200 2.2 0.3 1200 1.1 0.2 0.2 1200 2.8 0.2 0.1
1500 2.8 0.3 1500 nbs) 0.3 O.1 1500 4.6 0.1
1800 2.6 0.6 1800 1.8 0.1 1800 3.3 Oo
2100 (1.6 0.6 2100 0.9 0.2 O52: 2100 3.1 Of2
Av. 2r2 -6 .0 Av. 1.3 ue eo .0 Av 3.3 (0) A
June June June
0300 «3.1 130 0.21 0300 2.0 0.6 0300 3.6 12
0900 2.2 0.2 1.3 0900 «2.2 0.1 0900 «(3.1 0.3
1200 3.0 1.0 0.1 1200 1.9 0.3 1200 2.9 0.3
1500 2a 0.1 1.0 1500 2.6 0.3 1500 3.9
1800 2.6 Os1- 051 1.3 0.1 1800 2.9 0.4 1800 2.6 0.2
2100 1.8 1.0 0.21 2100 (1.9 Oval! 2100 3.4 0.4
Av. 2.5 .0 oak 121 ok Av. 2c2 ene 72 Av. 3.3 iA
July July July
0300 3.9 0.9 nL 0300 4.4 0.1 0.8 On 0.2 0300 4.4 A) 0.2 0.21
0900 «3.4 0.8 0.2 a) 0900 =3.6 0.4 0.1 0900 2.9 0.4 0.2
1200 3.2 0.2 0.2 abey) 0.1 1200 2.8 0.1 0.2 0.1 1200 3.4 0.1 0.1
1500 3.2 0.6 On1 1.8 0.1 1500 3.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 1500 3.6 0.4 0.1
1800 4.9 0.2 Blea: 0.2 1800 63.2 0.3 0.7 1800 3.7 0.4 Ofn
2100 3.2 0.4 art) 0.1 2100 3.8 0.2 0.3 0.1 2100 3.4 0.7 0.1
Av. 3.6 5 el 228 pae Av. 3.5 Ae) 23 -0 2 12 Av 3.6 -6 Ae) =a
August August August
0300 «6.5 1.2 0.21 0300 4.1 0.1 12 0300 «3.6 2.3
0900 6.4 1.0 0.5 0900 «3.8 0.4 0900 4.3 0.8 0.1
1200 5.9 0.5 0.4 1200 «44.2 0.21 1200 5.4 0.6
1500 6.1 0.2 0.4 1500 4.7 On 1500 5.0 Ole
1800 6.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 1800 4.4 1800 4.8 0.7
2100 5.2 0.4 0.2 2100 4.8 0.2 2100 5.4 252:
Av. 6.0 76 73 fe) Av. 4.3 +0 BS Av 4.8 1.0 ie)
ILTAMNA KOTZEBUE LAKE MINCHUMINA
Time Weather type Time Weather type Time Weather type
of Rain Snow Hail Fog Fog w/ Smoke Thunder- of Rain Snow Hail Fog Fog w/ Smoke Thunder- of Rain Snow Hail Fog Fog w/ Smoke Thunder-
day sleet smoke haze storm day sleet smoke haze stora day sleet smoke haze storm
April April April
03u0 ae2 4.3 0.8 0300 0.8 5.8 2.3 0300 0.1 2.3 0.4
0900 1.0 3.6 Tt 0900 «(0.3 4.7 anti 0.2 0900 «60.3 Die
1200 1.4 3.0 Ont 1200 0.3 5.1 2.3 0.2 1200 0.3 age) 0.1
1500 0.9 2.8 abso) 1500 0.6 4.9 2.1 0.1 1500 0.4 abi
1800 ibe) 3.2 alee) 1800 0.8 4.8 ort 0.1 1800 (Oey ais lojmal
2100 1.1 3.4 1.6 2100 (0.8 5.2 a) 0.21 2100 0.1 1.6 0.2
Av. att 3.4 ikea Av. -6 5.1 252) Ea) Av. Be 9 22
0300 4.6 0.8 1.3 0300 «#41.9 ea 2n9 0300 «1.6 0.8 0.8
0900 2.8 0.7 0.7 0900 «(21.9 ryat 2:8 0900 «(1.2 0.4 0.3
1200 etl 0.4 0.3 1200 1.8 1.0 abe) 1200 ples 0.3 Oral 0.1
1500 3.6 0.3 0.3 1500 1.3 O29, 0.9 1500 2.0 0.4 0.3
1800 3.3 0.3 0.2 1800 1.2 0.8 aloe 1800 «(1.3 0.4 Ona
2100 4.7 0.2 0.7 2100 2.0 1.1 Lint 2100 _=i1.7 0.8 oat
Av. 3.6 75 “6 Av a7 1.4 ale) Av. 1.5 “5 +3 Ae)
June June June
0300 4.0 1.6 O.1 0300 3.2 29: 0300 4.0 0.2 0.6
o900- 3.8 alaal 0900 2.0 0.1 2.6 0900 «3.4 0.6
1200 3.7 0.4 1200 «2.3 2.3 1200 2.3 0.3
1500 3.9 0.1 0.1 1500 1.3 or) 1500 2.4 0.4 0.2
1800 2.9 OR: 1800 1.6 alee) 1800 3.2 0.2 0.4
2100 3.3 0.3 0.1 2100 3.0 2.4 2100 2.1 0.4 0.1
Av. 3.6 .6 (e) (e) Av. 252 .0 2.3 Av. 2,9 .0 4 al
July July July
0300 3.0 4.6 0.3 0300 4.1 2.8 0.4 0300 4.4 ateul 1.4
0900 3.8 259 0.2 0.3 0900 2:9 272 0.4 0900 2.9 0.1 1.8
1200 3.9 OF9 Ora: 0.4 1200 2.8 1.4 0.3 1200 4.1 1.2 Oe
1500 4.0 aby (oes 0.6 1500 3.7 0.9 0.3 1500 4.2 Ong 0.3
1800 4.6 0.8 0.3 Oed 1800 3.8 1.0 0.4 0.1 1800 3.4 0.1 0.9 O.1
2100 4.0 0.9. 0.3 2100 3.4 1.3 0.4 0.1 2100 4.3 0.9 0.3
Av 3.9 a9: 1 3 (0) Av 3.4 6 4 .0 Av 3.9 2) el ol
August August August
0300 6.6 4.3 0.1: 0300 7.0 2.3 0.1 On 0.1 0300 5.0 0.9 0.3 Ove
0900 «45.8 eaeA/ 0900 =5.3 2.2 (oat 0900 «4.7 0.3 0.2
1200 5.8 1.6 Of: 1200 6.3 ples) Ore) 1200 4.3 0.4 0.2 0.21
1500 5.6 2.0 1500 5.9 1.2 0.2 1500 3.4 0.2 0.2
1800 5.9 2.2 1800 bt) 1.4 0.2 1800 5.1 O.1 0.2
2100 _ (‘5.8 Cath 0.1 2100 5.3 1S 0.21 Oe: 2100 +5.2 0.2
Av. 5.9 2.6 0 Av 5.8 ay? a) S me) Av 4.6 73 22 ee
139
vel (Oem lO AO oO Cy sto rast ° re
ret oe oO aoe u elie
ma mn 101 st De] wo m re aM Vot}et
’ Ciera par “ ‘ ie He at ate ate fi
(- aaq0e o i) °o OoOo000
An sh rim 10 eth efo
too oo aol’
e ec ii
UI
in
w
1] 00 rt i} LS a ela aet fw ela ra] MO rth wolo 19 oO an wa
elite) tae . ‘ ' : abet shee : ‘ ‘oy ‘ : a ish ot boo
Nilis ao hielo a aoo0aa oo ra) Aertel at a ilo loo
w te
is 4 5
rt el
rh " '
a) a oO
f tr
" ’
‘ a i YO 0 & o bh Oe vl °o rio
in Ded fter ' oy ' : Hg
8 Bi AM Met et et c fe) °
oO Flot
| au
“
\ f ea UO Pala om (s) 0 rh ef O19 wl
a { we Shee helene ceed Wed Liner eer ene ba
re tet a (-W-Vf-K-] aaa a ravmratl (ied rh bh bc 0 belt
sal! da
he i
a ain i=) Qo [a
a 1 ia Ol] + oO
ne el ia a} te) cil fia)
wy Ble or oo allay O,
8 7
e
a '
nt
«i oO
0 bl be cox Baie
- a oa °o
a
a
ty
f 4 0 ‘ ria S) 0010
Hl d eo rl ao000
by ae
i
" rl S) el rt jo rit a
| ol °o oO ia) 2°a
‘ ir)
10
% ‘
o] a
19 ” 9 el elettet nia MQ O]et
a i) aa ao oo oo alr (=)
p <t
tle el °o
tr vm) ra) ‘
a
«
fa ’
o fl A 0
o 1) A ela aa aa waa ew Oo)
i [ist
na
” iy
900
| bo] aaa
A alc wy
BIE On
by
cs) rit drt eh Yet el rh det cetret Jo rl jo he
(ome) Thea) fe) o a900 fs) rel
° rd
a
Ts]
°
moO Olet an fa) 19:19 Ao 9
rhe QO elfet aeo0aa a0 fa)
oF
el
o
a
i
ry
10 oN) eifet het ort a a WIC 12 1 @ y bt mfio cola mae 19 Aanaow
cn ‘ thine fy Nee Te ae | bs Seco By Harrison) toe +f ayeahvatgalipe Heatieadt oct)
lowe) lac fal HI oo a dire Wy UA @arty oo e00FrtrF oeoorr
8 A =i =
el fa)
°
et
ir)
n
oho
219 WO} st
eaaqaa0
QOaoqo00q0og do].
na qQih ©
AOrletet
cGRaTA
3m:
eaeaoaaa
Oqaaqgagaols
1 TW Ai OO rt
OA et eh aw
a all ds
us
o
Table 55.--Time of season by which ground is thawed to various depths
UW OO UO EVE LOUS. CepUns
(Av. 1950-58)
Eee ea A 0
re
oO Ww oO
8 ad 80 in “s oO oO
4 3B 38 n q iS 3 4 8 fe
a 5 S o {o) » @ i a ad S isn) +2
Date m ia fe) = Q “d a is ® 3B 6 S @B
43 ira me} Ss G faa N tom 4 oO ial
: u O° ~» a0 gs “d q 4? so) rt cq oO
~ fe) is © - 8 8 fo) rs = 8 iS)
Ey z x faa faa a fe co Me =) oO oO =
6" Depth
April 1 ay)
Le x
el ne
May Hu: x x x x x X
lal x me pe x 5 Xe x x ae Xe
Pap x x x Be x x x x x x x Be
June 1 5.0 x oe x ne x ae eth.e me X a8 x
nal! x me x x me x De x x x x
Pal x x a x x x x Ki x x x x
12 Depth
alll
el x
May al X x x
akak Ne Ba x x de ae
PAL mG Fe x me x Be De x ee x x
June ak x x. x x x x Xe x x x x x
abak 5 BG x x K x mt x x x x 3
el x x x x x x x x: x mK me Be
24" Depth
Apia 1:
aa
el
May al x
akal x
el x x x Xe ae x re: me x
June al} x x ae x x x x x x x
alae x me x x x K me x re me x
el x X be x x x ae x x x x me x
1/ No data for 6-inch depth.
Source: United States Weather Bureau compilation.
141
Table 34.--Forest fire statistics for the United States, 1950-58
Year Place aa Fires res ae See eee
protected a burned Lightning Other Under acre -10 ecres OQve Wacres
Number
per Acres
MM per Num- Per- Num- Per- Num- Per- Num- Per- Num- Per-
1 M acres Number acres Acres fire ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent
Alaska sue! 225,000 224 1.0 2,057,817 9,186.7 27 12 197 88 94 42 46 20 84 38
1950 Other states BLM 2 138,121 472 3.4 78,827 167.0 152 32 320 68 84 18 121 26 267 56
Other states all epencies 573,186 104,996 183.2 3,798,464 36.2 6,491 6 98,505 94 16,215 15 50,281 48 38,500 37
Alaska BLM 225,000 271 1.2 219,694 810.7 27 10 244 390 119 «44 Te. 27, 80 29
1951 Other states BIM 140,111 635 4.6 124,848 196.6 203 32 432 68 103 16 182 29 350 55
Other states all agencies 575,916 105,868 183.8 3,526,373 33.3 7,029 tf 98,839 93 15,682 15 51,630 49 38,556 36
Alaska BLM 225,000 136 -6 73,801 542.6 11 8 125 92 76 56 32 24 28 20
1952 Other states BLM 140, 625 637 4.6 97,223 152.6 207 32 430 68 Tinks) yale / 171 27 356 56
Other states all agencies 581,210 127,997 220.2 6,628,093 51.8 8,012 6 119,985 94 19,109 15 63,277 49 45,611 36
Aleska BLM 225,000 285 1.3 466,748 1,637.7 75 26 210 74 126 44 64 22 95. 33
1953 Other states BLM 138 , 680 601 4.4 107,252 178.4 176 29 425 71 111 18 194 32 296 49
Other states all agencies 586,220 104,595 249.0 2,851,455 27.3 8,529 8 96,067 92 19,867 19 54,883 52 29,845 29
Alaska BLM 225 ,000 262 1.2 1,389,920 5,305.0 63 24 199 76 125 48 53 20 84 32
1954 Other states BLM 138 ,446 567 4.1 117,347 207.0 164 29 403 71 94) “17. 171 30 302 53
Other states all agencies 600 ,237 127,273 212.0 2,962,671 23.3 7,780 6- 119,493 94 19,988 16 79,257 55 37,028 29
Alaska BLM 225 ,000 190 8 37,232 196.0 26 14 164. 86 105 55 42 22 43 23
1955 Other states BLM 134,419 380 2.8 51,835 136.4 116 30 264 70 91 24 122 32 163 44
Other states ell agencies 603,884 87,604 145.1 2,812,208 32.1 6,261 7 81,343 93 17,981 21 48,177 55 21,446 24
Alaska BLM 225,000 225 1.0 476,542 2,118.0 63 28 162 72 88 39 59 26 78 35
1956 Other states BLM 138 , 468 571 4.1 37,451 65.6 254 44 317 56 180 32 187 32 204 36
Other states all agencies 607 ,032 94,338 155.4 1,985,084 21.0 11,459 12 82,879 88 21,298 23 52,067 55 20,972 22
Alaska BLM 225,000 403 1.8 5,034,554 12,492.7 164 41 239 59 124 31 93 23 186 46
1957 Other states BLM 138,799 827 6.0 309,212 373.9 272 33 555 67 140 17 262 32 425 51
Other states all agencies 613,382 65,702 107.1 1,286,458 19.6 5,659 9 60,043 91 15,523 24 37,768 57 12,411 19
Alaske BLM 225,000 284 1.3 315,860 1,112.2 90 32 194 68 98 34 80 28 106 37
1958 Other states BLM 137 ,487 1,075 7.8 617,936 574.8 449 42 626 58 aReb Saly/ 319 30 575 53
Other states all agencies 614,134 80,308 1350.8 1,461,367 18.2 10,828 13 69,480 87 20,816 26 44,184 55 15,308 19
Alaska BLM 225,000 253 aaa 1,119,130 4,417.6 61 24 192 76 106 42 60 24 87 34
Av. Other states BLM 138,351 641 4.6 171,326 267.3 221 34 419 65 122 19 192 30 327 51
Other states all agencies 595,022 99,848 167.8 3,034,686 30.4 8,005 8 91,848 92 18,498 18 52,503 53 28.853 29
Source: 1/ Annual Reports of the Director, BLM (Statistical Appendix).
2/ Forest Fire Statistics. Prepared annually by the Division of Cooperative Forest Protection, Forest Service, U.S.D.A.
142
Table 35 .--Number of fires by cause on lands protected by Bureau of Land Management,
1950-58
ly,
Year Place Cause— Total
LI CF NS) DB I LU RR MI
1950 Alaska 27 58 43 54 g 0 We 26 224
Other states 152 20 ea he 40 2 Sil: i A472
1951 Alaska aie TOT 47 fal ie 2 2 OO Pagal
Other states 203 20 181 76 56 a 37 61 635
1952 Alaska abie 38 16 46 6 O 4 15 136
Other States 207 ei 188 13 52 aE 23 ie 637
1953 Alaska 15 82 35 oul a O (6) — Al 285
Other states 176 37 154 96 30 2 38 68 601
1954 Alaska 63 68 49 ball 8 O 6) 23 262
Other states 164 oe alenté 95 46 al 16 96 567
1955 Alaska 26 163 30 25 3 () al 30 190
Other states 116 26 19 61 34 al 18 45 380
1956 Alaska 63 64 28 40 5 ) all 24 225
Other states 254 Silt 49 78 46 1 28 84 Dias
1957 Alaska 164 85 30 78 akab 2 i Sill 403
Other states eile 20 140 97 36 2 74 186 827
1958 Alaska 90 13 27 54 9 ) O OL 284
Other states 449 SL 185 alae 83 2 43 15/5 ani
Average number of fires by cause
1950- Alaska 61 70 34 Be Hii 0.4 Oe 28 200
1958 Other states pel 26 1356 86 47 re 34 89 641
Percentage of fires by cause
1950- Alaska 24 Pa als at 3 Of 1 ali) 100
1958 Other states 35 4 21 14 7 Of 5 14 100
aly LI - Lightning; CF - Campfires; S - Smokers; DB - Debris burning;
I - Incendiary; LU - Lumbering; RR - Railroad; MI - Misc.
Source: Annual Reports of the Director, BIM (Statistical Appendix).
143
Table 36.--Number of fires by size class on lands protected by Bureau of Land
Year
1950
LISD
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1950-
1958
1950-
1958
1950-
1958
1950-
1958
Management, 1950-58
Size Class
lene PW eee ee ge EO
Alaska 94 46 25 7 52 224
Other states 84 azn 141 55 Fak 472
Alaska 119 ile 35 14 Sil 271
Other states 103 182 1155) 76 119 635
Alaska 76 32 16 3 9 136
Other states 110 alyal 184 69 103 637
Alaska 126 64 39 at Al 285
Other states aahal 194 HHS 52 91 601
Alaska V25 53 31 16 a7 262
Other states 94 albsfals 142 59 101 567
Alaska 105 42 el 10 12 190
Other states 91 122 79 ol Dye 380
Alaska 88 59 40 14 24 225
Other States 180 187 116 42 46 Al
Alaska 124 93 64 20 102 403
Other states 140 262 176 19 170 827
Alaska 98 80 45 16 45 284
Other states 181 319 eAlL 123 211 12075
Alaska 955 5AlL 316 LS) $59 2,280
Other states 1,094 1 teg 1,387 586 969 5,765
Total 2,049 2,010 1,703 701 1 322 8,045
Average number of fires by size class
Alaska 106 60 35 13 39 253
Other states 122 192 154 65 108 641
Percent of fires by size class
Alaska 42 24 14 5 15 100
Other states 19 30 24 10 alte 100
Number of fires per million acres protected by size class
Alaska 0.47 0.27 OPED 0.06 (0) Say algal
Other states 0.88 W259 al ealal 0.47 OLS 4,63
Source: Annual Reports of the Director, BLM (Statistical Appendix).
144
Year
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
Av.
Table 37.--Fires according to size class by number, percent of total, and number per million acres, 1950-58
106
Size class
A B Cc
Per- Num- Per- Nun- Per- Num-
cent ber cent ber cent ber
of MM Num- of MM Num- of MM Num-
total acres ber total acres ber total acres ber
42.0 42 46 20.5 a0, 25 alae} wack 7
43.9 soo 72 26.6 OR, 35 EES oL6 14
bono 254 32 23.5 14 16 Ls sOT 3
44,2 56 64 Beek ra) 39 pkay/ Aly 15
47.7 «D6 53 20.2 224 ol 1.8 14 16
55.3 47 42 Book ~L9 ral deel 09 10
oh leak 09 59 26.2 26 40 LS alge} 14
30.4 255 93 PARES} 41 64 Poish Bree} 20
34.5 044 80 28.2 56 45 25:8 20 16
41.9 AT 60 23.7 Aah 36 13.8 «5: 13
D
Per-
cent
of
APATAHAUGvoAW
. . .
AOWArFPANWDNDLH
ao
°
oO
total acres
1/ Based on 225 million acres protected.
Source:
Annual Reports of the Director, Bureau of Land Management (Statistical Appendix).
145
Total
Num-
ber
Num- MM
ber acres
224 .99
reat fal 1.20
136 .60
285 1.27
262 L116
190 .84
225 1.00
403 1282
284 1.26
253 pee lr}
Table 38 .--Acreage burned by fuel types on lands protected by Bureau of Land Management,
1950-58
Vegetative cover type
Year Place ees Total
Forest Brush Grass Other
1950 Alaska 568,123 1,353,693 AT ,268 88,733 A ODT Olen
Other states 16,353 Soe De 26,921 1 78 , 827
Ale tae Alaska 92, 791 88,589 Suis 37,002 219,694
Other states av nle Dat 58,185 49,506 -- 124,848
1952 Alaska 14,599 8,166 4,776 45 ,260 73,801
Other states 8,561 56,562 32,068 32 97,223
1953 Alaska 284,575 115,916 5,415 62,842 466,748
Other states 17,031 46,363 35,858 -- 107,252
1954 Alaska 354,817 333,890 84,588 616,625 1,389,920
Other states 12,966 75,380 29,001 -- 117,347
IES }oy5) Alaska 12,066 11,353 4,102 Oy tela 37,202
Other states 2,702 25,489 25,610 34 51,835
1956 Alaska 86,075 6,011 9,942 374,514 476,542
Other states STANT 195876 (BUS 55 Sif, 4511.
1957 Alaska 2,461,472 487,621 9,826 2,075,635 5,054,554
Other states 9,185 ALO) Aratsw 129 , 740 -- 309,212
1958 Alaska 204,454 28,973 11,874 1ORDD9 315,860
Other states 18 ,849 258,527 281,183 CO Oal 617,936
Average acreage burned by fuel type
1950- Alaska 453,219 270 ,246 20,011 375,654 1,119,130
1958 Other States Te, DOW 81,802 68 ,189 8,833 171,325
Total Average 465,720 352,048 88,200 384, 487 1,290,455
Percent of acreage burned by fuel type
1950- Alaska 40 oA 2 34 100
1958 Other States af 48 40 5 100
Source: Annual Reports of the Director, Bureau of Land Management, (Statistical
Appendix).
146
Table 39.--Fires by general cause according to number, acreage, and percentage, 1940-58
Year Lightning Man-caused Total
iyi Lf
Nuai- Per- 2/ Per- Num- Per- pf Eer- Num- 3/
ber cent Acres cent ber cent Acres— cent ber Acres—
1940 O ) 130 100 130 4,500 ,O000
1941 O O 116 100 116 5,645,774
1942 ) ) Not 78 100 Not 78 452,510
1943 40 20.6 available 154 79.4 available 194 666,773
1944 18 -24.6 55 (ae 73 110,604
1945 30). 42.2 41 DG (a 117,313
1946 52 40.0 78 60.0 130 1,436,597
1947 32) 20-1 eal LTO9 159 1,429,896
1948 PARC AMG af 113 84.3 134 33,676
1949 elke: 46 86.8 53 17,933
Total PAOLO ARTA) 938 82.4 1,238 6 ee A OvG
Av. 20 94 114 1,241,108
1950 ile lie 0 445,595 21.6 OFT, 88.0. 1,612,222 78.4 224 AAO Ole,
abe}oyal ele. LOK.,O 17,484 87.0 244 90.0 202,e10 92.0 e271 219,694
1952 abe 8a. La006 19.7 125 99 59,245 80.3 136 73,801
1953 08 UeOnO $81,143 81.6 210 Toes 85,605 18.4 285 466,748
1954 63 24.0 (1,347,990 97.0 LOO 650 41,9380 3.0 262 1,389,920
1955 ebm Shoat 10,467 28.1 164 86.35 Con hoo fe9 190 ST ;e008
1956 63 28.0 446,531 93.7 162 72.0 30,011 6.3 225 476,542
Dif, 164 °40.7 4,773,323 ° 94.8 259 DOS £61,231 Dine 403 5,034,554
1958 COMI ies CeO,OO leot 194 68.3 Bi ,eno ef.6 284 315,860
Total 546 23.9.7,665,726 76.1 1,734 76.1 2,406,442 23.9 2,280 10,072,168
Av. 61 851,748 192 267,382 253 DOS 30.
Source: ay 1940-1945 Data from files at BLM office, Anchorage.
1946-1958 Annual reports of the Director, BLM (Statistical Appendix).
2/ Computed from annual fire reports on file at BLM office, Anchorage
and from individual fire reports.
3/ 1940-1945 Forestry Program for Alaska.
1946-1958 Annual reports of the Director, BLM (Statistical Appendix).
147
Year
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
Av.
Table 40.--Percent of all fires on which no action was taken, 1950-58
Total 1
Number
Balk
27
aay:
75
63
26
63
64
90
61
Lightning
No action 2/
Number
18
AS
aL
33
25
ala
31
30
21
20
67
48
9
44
40
42
49
18
25
33
Percent
Total L No action &
Number Percent
HM
244
125
210
199
164
162
259
194
193
Man-caused
Number
anys
20
9
22
ano Pf WA
1/ Annual Reports of the Director, Bureau of Land Management (Statistical
Appendix).
ey Coded IBM runs from individual fire reports.
148
Table 41 .--Area burned according to cause and whether or not suppression action was taken, 1950-58
ear Lightning Man-caused Total
Action No-action Action No-action
Acres Percent Acres Percent Acres Percent Acres Percent Acres
1950 0 679 ,080 33 82,313 4 1,296,424 63 2,057,817
diay 4 6,591 3 149,391 68 54,924 25 219,694
1952 20 40 0 47,945 65 11,064 15 73,801
1953 209,138 45 121,354 26 130 ,256 28 6,000 1f 466,748
1954 389 ,078 28 972 ,674 70 27,798 2 370 of 1,389,920
1955 6,329 17 10,053 27 10,053 27 10,797 29 37,238
1956 323,708 68 133 ,282 28 19,062 4 490 of 476,542
L957, 3,826,261 76 150;186 alts} 201,382 4 251,728 5 5,034,554
1958 168 ,106 53 50,671 16 95,258 30 1,820 1- 315,860
Av. 549,574 49 303,214 rag 84,828 8 181,514 16 Ly LES51:30
Source: Percentages from coded IBM runs from individual fire reports.
Total acreages from Annual Reports of the Director, Bureau of Land Management (Statistical Appendix).
Other acreages computed from above sources.
149
Table 42 .--Frequency of all fires for each month of the fire season by size class
(Av. 1950-58)
te April May Jung July August September October November Total
Num- Per- Num- Per- Num- Per- WNum- Per- Num- Per- Num- Per- Num- Per- Nun- Per- Num-Per-
ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent
Lightning fires
A 2 14 19 8 20 10 3 8 2 50 46 9
B il: 76 39 15 38 19 9 23 al 25 88 23
c 4 29 59 23 50 24 6 15 119 17
D 2 14 2T ame 16 8 2 5 1 25 47 9
E 5 36 110 43 Te) 39 alg} 49 214 42
Total 14 100 254 100 203 100 39 + =100 4 100 514 100
percent per 3 49 39 8 1
month
Man-caused
A 29 52 153 34 199 2T 161 55 109 69 64 56 2 22 1 14 718 49 |
B 11 20 159 36 108 50 Te 25 21 13 2T 24 re) 22 2 29 402 27
C T 12 80 18 48 12 22 8 Ags) 10 11 10 2 22 a 14 186 13 |
D nl 2 21 5 14 4 13 5 2 at 1 al: 1 11 53 3
E 8 14 32 Uf 28 Tf 24 T aE 16 10 9 2 22 3 43 118 8
Total 56 100 445 100 397 100 292 100 158 100 TVS =LOO 9 100- 7 100 1,477 100
percent per 4 30 27 19 1 8 1 of
month |
Total fires
A 29 52 155 34 218 33 181 Sy ete 57 66 56 2 22 aL 14 764 38
B af 20 160 35 147 23 110 22 30 5 28 24 2 22 2 29 490 25
C dG 12 84 18 107 aly ¢ T2 14 21 ala’ alah i} 2 22 al 14 305 15
D 1 2 23 5 41 6 29 6 4 FS 2 2 1 11 100 5
E 8 14 3T 8 138 21 103 21 30 15 10 9 2 22 3 43 332 «17
Total 56 100 459 100 651 100 495 100 197 100 zy -100 9 100- 7 100 15995 00)
percent per 3 35} 33 25 10 6 of of
month
Source: Actual tally of all available individual fire reports (289 less than official count).
Table 43 .--Acreage burned by months and causes, 1950-58
Year April Mey June July August September October November Total
Lightning
1950 303,775 29,651 12,607 22,080 368,113
1951 4,107 30,116 151 34,374
1952 14,289 1,020 4 15,313
1953 381 245,178 124,243 4,945 374,747
1954 4,203 1,249,376 19,573 22,956 3 1,356,111
1955 14,374 6,154 3,382 23,910
1956 450,823 6,222 457,045
1957 4,753 3,420,608 1,341,450 61,513 910 4,829,234
1958 140 196,341 45 ,832 479 242,792
Av. acres burned 34,806 624,972 183,024 12,834 101 855,737
Percent of lightning
fires cpl 73.0 21.4 1.5 100.0
Percent of all fires 3.1 55.8 16.4 1.1 76.4
Man-caused
1950 82 1,471,808 45,888 86,474 34,942 35,758 123 14,629 1,689,704
1951 146 97,033 4,671 55,214 26,238 2,018 185,320
1952 270 57,251 63 127 3 TT4 58,488
1953 2,257 22,028 20,229 43,526 367 3,594 92,001
1954 30 17,082 1,014 750 14,932 a! 33,809
1955 10 1,765 2,729 8,721 51 46 13,322
1956 3435 9,047 10,106 al 19,497
1957 4,646 3,723 193,267 110 3,574 205,320
1958 6,754 34,361 11,289 20,406 ; 137 121 73,068
Av. acres burned 1,031 183,260 17,316 46,503 8,545 4,614 499 1,625 263,393
Percent of man-caused
fires 0.4 69.6 6.6 a Ges & 3.2 Lv 0.2 0.6 100.0
Percent of all fires On: 16.4 1.5 4.2 0.8 0.4 -0 0.2 23.6
All fires
Av. acres burned 1,031 218 ,065 642,287 229,527 21,379 4,715 499 1,625 1,119,130
Percent of all fires OF 19.5 S75 20.5 ee) 0.4 -0 (oe 100.0
Source:
Coded IBM runs from individual fire reports, adjusted to the official totals.
(1957 from summary sheets of Area 4).
Totals from Annual Reports of the Director, BLM (Statistical Appendix).
151
Table 44 .--Estimated damage from forest fires on lands protected by Bureau of Land Management, 1950-58
Tangible damage Intangible damages
ee Eas Timber Brush Grass Other Boca
1950 Alaska $3,289,979 $1,488,183 $976,367 $2,000 ,000 $7,754,529
Other States 52,507 115,470 66,924 1,882 236,783
1951 Alaska 425 ,420 160,000 192 , 747 10 ,000 788 ,167
Other states 429,210 214,161 154,371 3,584 801,126
1952 Alaska 73,472 14,538 6,728 35 ,256 129,994
Other states 212,017 272,158 128 ,218 - 612,393
1953 Alaska 876,571 150"955 7,424 82,902 P27, 852:
Other states 835 ,889 214,284 191,705 1,972 1,243,850
Timber eer Cs Forage Watershed Wildlife Reoreen
duction tion
1954 Alaska 990 ,534 - 500 $ 536,418 “1,331,965 $ 1,503 2,860,920
Other states 90,881 12,601 439,467 146 , 820 8,384 - 698,153
1955 Alaska 6,430 169 36 29,038 30 ,587 15,899 82,159
Other states 6,962 6,399 105 ,861 408 ,878 4,865 1,102 534,067
1956 Alaska es TOT 10 2,216 328,770 285 ,838 847 730 , 478
Other states 55,418 e2l,Tt2 18,681 241,487 11,925 eeu! 350 ,534
1957 Alaska 2,508,724 3,781 274,808 2,311,253 2,506,080 121,406 7,726,052
Other states 96,178 10,133 162 , 600 3,045,114 LS LOD 515 3,0e17, 731
1958 Alaska 403,892 2,452 58,846 355,304 312,645 307 ,997 1,441,136
Other states 57,266 6,430 328 ,137 3,635,495 TL, OTT 4,695 3,104,000
DS ee ee ee ee
Source: Annual Reports of the Director, Bureau of Land Management (Statistical Appendix).
152
Table 45 .--Summary of damage in dollars
(Av. 1950-58)
Place Tangible Intangible Total Average
Dollars $/Mil A Dollars $/Mil A Dollars $/Mil A
Alaska $12,027,579 53,456 $10,603,708 $47,128 $22,631,287 $100 , 584
Other states 4,305 , 700 31,201 7,602 ,937 55,094 11,908,637 86,294
Total $16 , 333,279 $18,206,645 $34,539,924
Average $44,995 $50,156 $ 95,151
Source: Annual reports of the Director, BLM (Statistical Appendix).
153
onth and yea:
ss b
cl
=
irss in each co
2
z
‘able 46 .--Number of
T
wo
(av. 1950
000' 08
000' On
100‘ 09!
000' 09:
- 100' Ov
000' Ov
- L00' og
000' 08
le ed
jo
»] 000' OL
uw n
8} ~t00"s
00'S
£00"
000'T
-TOR
oon
“984
aaoy
40 9g
Year
/000' ony
000' O84}
-100' 094}
000' 094}
100! ovg|
000' ov
~100' oa
000' OB ¥}
~100' OL}
ce
7
+y 000‘ OT4
~t00' S¥
000'S¥
~t00' TY
000'T
Lory
oon}
-92!
aso]
40 Gai
Year,
el rl
rhe
lo wan
Mh Oh oO 019
at
ret
be
f
=f
al
rt
rh 12M
wagon
epren
a
ie
a A A 1
1 si
1010 10
oF OF
reetet
a
re rt st
1 ALI Ht
al
qo
et a
<2
Octobe
19 et Oe
1956
i)
0
a
wo
1
oO
i
000! on
LOO! OOF
-T00' Ove
100! Oa$
ul TOO! OF
bow x
D1 io O (19 bm
Boe Has 18 8) 0 to f2 fp Boy
g Cre eta A et AGe!
A we
3
2
2.
5
<=
9
a
000' ont 4
as) ie)
000' 09%
et 1]
o00' ove]
aeia
000 oat anwowoa
000' OL#
~100' Gt
OM"
000' Ss
~T00' T¥
ho
900 TH a mh cia rile 1d
“OOR FPR cy ety
ryt
eo 9 0c A eto oO st | 18
~ DAP 0 cy 10 0 19 1D ea}
19
0b
ene)
10 10.10
OOF OF
rleted
/000' on}
000' ony
~100' 094)
000' 094
~000' OV#}
000' ov
-100' 024}
000! oz4]
-100' O14
000' Ot]
-100' 94)
000'S¥]
-Too' TH
000' 14}
OO Am wo
9
10.
154
Table 47 .--Number of fires according to time from origin to discovery
Time in hours
oe MeO ==] 1-2 peers 3.=.6- § - 12 — 12-= 24 24 - 48 48 = 72 72+ Total
ee Fuel type 1/
Saree Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other
May
A 24 26 8 4 3 5 5 5 3 2 iT) 3 2 1 2 ) 5 3 59 49
B 29 28 E} 3 6 3 10 4 5 1 2 2 fe 3 L 0) 1 A265 48
c 10 10 6 1 0 2 3 4 3 3 ie) ie) 2 4 2 1 2 eames at
D 3 at ne ul a (0) 0) L 0 0) ab ub 2 Au a 0) ie} 1 9 6
E 2 2 4 4 0 ie) 2 L 1 2 2 ua dl 0) 0 0) ay 1 13 11
Total 68 67 28 15 «10 10)" 720 15 12 8 12 i, 9 9 6 1 9 1 14 141
June
A 3U 24 5 4 iB 7 5 8 fe oo) 615 df 6 1 4 aD 3 2 78 Bie
B 25 & 10 is} 5 4 6 4 5 4 3 5 9 3 2 0 4 é 69 34
c 18 4 2 3 b| 1 4 5 5 2 5 bj 2 3 1 (0) oF 1 47 24
D if FS) a} 6) 1 0 0 2 L al 5 2 ) 4 2 (0) (0) 2 18 16
E 1 6 ie) 1 io) af ie) 3 fe) e) al 2 0 3 0 ai e) (e) 2 peg
Total 81 47 19 13 «416 15 =«15 22 16 10 29 Lo ST. 14 9 2 12 6 214 148
July
A 36 9 9 rf 4 Ee ah 4 5 1 Lz (e) 10 2 5 2 ith 1 104 28
B 16 10 8 3 ak 3 5, 2 3 3 5 2 7 4 0 0) 5 ub 50 28
c 6 6 3 3 2 3 9 3 al f= al 2 3 5 2 1 4 0 31 25
D 10} 3 ah ie} 0 1 1 2 0 fe) 0 fe) 2 e) fe) O- 2 (e) 6 6
E °. 3 6 2 4 2 7 2 0 ) 9 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 37 14
Tctal 63 31 27 15 ll 11 33 13 2) 6 32 6 24 13 ) 3 20 3 228 101
August
A 13 5 5 1 5 2 d/ 2 5 2 15 1 5 2 4 1 5 2 64 18
B 5 1 al ie) 1 1 1 2 2 alt 2 fe) 4 3 1 ie) 2 1 eg) 9
C 1 3 1 (0) 0) 0 ie 2 0 ab e) au e 1 0 0 2 1 8 8
D ee 0 0) (e) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (0) io) 0 0 ie} 3 0
BE 2 1 1 e) e) e) 1 ) e) 0 e) al 0 ) 1 al 3 ul 8 4
Total 23 9 8 af 6 S= e L 6 7 AT 3 12 6 6 2 12 SP 02 39
Summary
A 103 64 ati 16 nye 16 28 19 18 8 54 otal 23 6 15 4 20 8 305 152
B 75 47 28 11 13 Ages) Ae TRS 8s} 9 12 te ee 13 4 fe) 12 9 203 219
(¢) 35 22 12 fd 4 6 18 14 9) 8 6 8 9 13 3) 2 13 4 114 84
D 12 9 4 1 2 1 1 5 1 zh 6 3 5 5 3 (0) 2 3 36 28
E 10 ale) 1 i 4 chee h0) 6 1 2 12 6 3 5 3 2 6 3 60 46
Total 235 154 82 42 45 37 79 56 44 28 90 35 62 42 30 8 53 27 718 429
1/ '"Spruce' type consists of Spruce, spruce-hardwood.
'Other': Broadleaf, reproduction, brush, grass, tundra, muskeg.
Source: Coded IBM runs from individual fire reports based on 1,149 fires.
155
AM
thin each size class end
y_witt
z
ype
Fuel
Mey
o time from origin to discover
(Av. 1950-58)
res accordin,
0
°
is
A,
”a
be
o
4
ee
Baus
ce
ru
s
Other
6
able “8 .--Percent o:
T,
Spru
~
Spruce Othe
19
io)
Ort
on
el
16.7
18.2
33.3
15.4
6.5 14.0
12.2
17.6
oo
Cs)
ao
Cos)
aM
10.7
°o
°
7-8
21.1
ae)
<
9.2
“I
o
9.2
13.8
39.5
156
» Guskeg.
undra
sed on
De:
t
h, grass,
brus
» Spruce-herdwood.
iduel fire reports
tion,
32
i?
of Spruce
reproduc
ind:
fr
runs
my
Broadleaf,
‘Spruce’ type consists
"Other':
i/
Table 49.--Percent of fires according to time from origin to discovery within each time class and fuel type
Av. 1950-58
Time in hours
SDE rea eee ea ee I ST ae eee Het or = 78 ae = Te Et
size Fuel type 1/
class
Spruce Other | Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other
May
A 35.3 38.8 28.6 30.8 30.0 50.0 25.0 33.3 25.0 25.0 58.3 42.8 22.2 nbiead 33.3 fe) 55.6 27.3
B 42.7 41.8 32.1 23.0 60.0 30.0 50.0 26.6 41.7 i) 16.7 286) © 12272 33.4 16.7 0 alnbaak 36.4
Cc 14.7 14.9 21.4 Teal, 0 20.0 15.0 26.7 25.0 37.5 10) (0) 2ene 44.4 33.3 100 22.2 18.1
D 4.4 1H 0) 3.6 Tet ~ LOO) te) (0) 6.7 0 (e) 8.3 14.3 22.2 Labaalt 16.7 (0) 0 Oa
EB pt) 3.0 14.3 30.8 ie) e) 10.0 6.7 8.3 25.0 LGR 14.3 Lee e) e) io) plalral Orel
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
June
A 37.1 51.1 26.4 30.8 31.3 53.8 33.3 36.4 31.2 30.0 Dien 36.8 35.3 irae 44,4 50.0 25.0 25.0
B 30.9 17.0 52.6 38.5 31.3 30.8 40.0 182 31.2 40.0 10.3 1528) 52.9 Alco ee. 2 (0) 33.3 37.5
te] 22.2 8.5 10.5 23.0 31.2 at 265% ea 31.2 20.0 UTS 26.4 11.8 elea, ee 0 41.7 L20
D 8.6 10.6 10.5 0) 6.2 0) (0) 9 6.4 10.0 17.3 10.5 0) 28 Beene (0) (0) 25.0
E a2. 12.8 (0) Healt 0 divale 0 13.6 (0) (e) 3.4 10.5 e) 21.4 (e) 50.0 (e) (0)
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
July
A 57.2 29.0 33.3 46.7 36.4 18.2 33.3 30.8 55.6 V6572-, Dsl ) 41.7 15.4 55.6 66.7 35.0 33.4
B 25.4 S22) F-29127 20.0 eel 2fa0, 152 15.4 33.3 50.0 15.6 33.4 29.2 30.8 (0) (0) 2520 33.3
(o} 9.5 HOSA eS 20.0 18.1 PSPS RM Se) 23.0 la aay 33.3 De 33.3 12.5 38.4 22.2 33.3 20.0 (0)
D (0) Clark 3.7 (0) (e) Real 3.0 16.4 0 (e) (0) (0) 8.3 fe) 0 (¢) 10.0 0)
E 1s) Plate RE 13.3 36.4 USt2) elee 15.4 0) 0 28.1 33.3 8.3 15.4 22.2 0 10.0 33.3
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
August
A 56.5 55.6 62.5 100 83.3 66.7 63.6 33.4 71.4 50.0 88.2 33.4 41.7 33.3 66.7 50.0 41.6 40.0
B 2aext De 125 (0) UG 33.3 9.1 33.3 28.6 25.0 V8 (0) 33.3 50.0 16.6 0 16.7 20.0
Cc 4.4 22.2 12.5 0 0) 0 18.2 33.3 (0) 25.0 ie) 33.3 LG a7 L6.7, 0) (0) UG sf, 20.0
D Sif fe) (0) (0) 0 (0) 0 fe) (0) (0) 0 (e) 8.3 0 0 0 0 0
EB 8.7 ALTE Sal L205 e) 0) 0 901 e) e) 0 (e) 33.3 ) (e) Great 50.0 25.0 20.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Summary
A 43.8 41.6 32.9 38.0 39.5 43.2 35.4 33.9 42.8 28.6 60.0 29.7 OT al: 14.2 46.9 50.0 37.7 29.6
B ols 9. 30.5 34.2 26.2 30.2 CLEA ie Ca fete) 210 31.0 32.1 13.3 18.9 36...5 31.0 18.8 (0) 22.6 33.3
c 14.9 14.3 14.6 16.7 16.4 16:5° -22.8 25.0 21.4 28.6 627 21.7 LAS 31.0 15.6 25.0 24.6 14.9
D 5.2 5.8 4.9 2.4 4.6 QT 1.4 8.9 2.4 S316 (ard 13,15 8.1 aisle?) 9.3 e) 3.8 Alplea?
EB 4.2 at} 13.4 UGai7. 9.3 8.1 12.6 10.7 2.4 Tod —1S5'6 16.2 4.8 SS 9.4 25.0 11.3 pee
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
1/ 'Spruce' type consists of Spruce, spruce-hardwood.
mi 'Other': Broadleaf, reproduction, brush, grass, tundra, muskeg.
Source: Coded IBM runs from individual fire reports, based on 1,149 fires.
157
1
Table 50 .--Distance to fires from headquarters at Anchorage or Fairbanks—
(Av.
Miles
Size O- 101- 201-
class 100 200 300 301
Lightning
A ae) 2.6 0.6 Ona
B 3.4 4.8 alah abe
C 3.6 ame 228 1.9
D .9 1.9 9 eT
Be / 207 6.7 3.8 ie
B/9/ .8 2.4 Tea .8
Total 14.3 235.6 10.9 fine
Percent 26 42 iy) 13
Action
A 66.1 25.6 Gee 0)
B 34.3 14.8 3.4 Let
C alyslere Sik 3.8 9
D 4.2 Pat aveal HLA)
EB G5 bes 2.4 flee
Bd aor 1.9 .9 6
Total T2625 58.9 nifA 5D
Percent 60 28 9 x)
All fires
A 66.9 mee a0 Od
B 36.7 AKG 369 2.8
C Tb PS5 WETS 5.0 eo
D 4.8 3.4 1.8 el ee
E Tals 8.8 er 2.4
B/ ean 4.0 2.0 130
Total T35ee Teowo 24.9 10.9
Percent 55 30 10 5
1950-58)
Miles
Size O- 101- 20i=
class 100 200 300 300
Other
A 64.0 pat 6.4 )
B Oar ale 2.2 53)
C IES A10) Gra ate 4
D 3.9 1.6 9 S7/
EB 4.9 ail iat feat
BA .9 TG 9 ae
Total TAKS} SS) 48.8 14.0 SA
Percent 64 26 8 r=
No-action
A 0:39 ale 70 0.8 Ora!
B ie (35 1 suk plants
C SS) ate ee 5
D .6 .8 ssh abe)
E ib Sal 3.0 2.8 absal
B+ A Pagal deal mak
Total 6.5 SD 7.0 Hep
Percent 20 Al 22 ALT /
Fires per million acres
A 2.03 0.42 0.12 0.01
B abil 26 OT .04
C 47 Sal -O9 .03
D 14 .05 -03 .03
B 80 els .O9 04
Bf S05 -06 .03 -O1
Total 4.03 1.09 43 elG
Percent 70 IBS) 8 se)
a
1/ According to Operations Area in which the fire occurred.
2/ 301-10,000 acres
3/ Over 10,000 acres
Source:
official count)
158
Occurrence maps from 2,171 individual fire reports, (109 less than
Table 51 .--Number of fires according to time from attack to control
(Av. 1950-58)
Tiue in hours
eon Ona ine CaS SEG 6 - 12 12 - 24 DA — 48 48-72 a Total
€12z6
t Lf
cless Fuel type 1
faces May
A 16 al 4 2 1 1 1 3 22 27
B 22 24 12 10 8 6 13 5 6 3 2 2 2 1 65 50
c 5 4 3 4 3 5 13 10 8 5 5 il 2 1 39 30
D 1 4 a 5 4 al al 2 1 18 3
E al al 1 ab uf 1 2 4 4 1 2 2 a 12 10
Total 44 49 20 16 16 15 33 19 19 i) 10 6 9 4 2 2 3 156 120
June
A 35 19 4 3 2 1 1 3 ul 43 26
B 20 alt f 12 2 all 5 8 7 9 1 5 3 a 3 71 33
Cc 4 5 2 5 4 2 abl 3 12 3 5 2 6 1 2 1 3 47 a4
D mn 3 1 2 1 2 7 @) 3 3 al 2 3 4 3 20 eu
E ak ab al ul 4 4 3 4 5 3 5 4 Lt 9 35 27
Total 60 42 18 14 18 11 21 16 33 13 16 9 15 a 10 4 25 15 216 131
July
A 34 17 8 3 2 ay 8 1 1 1 53 23
B 13 9 2 4 8 uy 8 5 3 2 6 5 4 3 1 3 1 56 35
Cc nl 2 al, 4 6 4 6 4 6 1 3 2 3 1 25 19
D ae 2 al 3 2 2 6 5
E ab Swell 3 1 1 1 2 6 1 2 18 6 32 aye
Total 48 28 1) 9 2u vine 25 10 10 4 17 rf 16 7 2 4 24 10 alg (2 93
August
A 22 4 4 1 2 2 1 29 ie
B al al 6 2 a 6 af 3 5 3 a 24 ‘fl
Cc al 1 1 1 4 1 1 at al 1 1 3 t) 8
D ab al 1 1 4 (e)
E 2 ul my al 3 2 Ti 3
Total 25 5 ub 3 3 3 8 i, 6 2 10 4 2 1 4 ay 4 5 73 25
Summary
A 107 61 20 8 6 5 12 6 1 a ae L al 147 83
B 56 51 41 18 A) 6 35 18 al 6 18 9 9 5 al; 1 6 1 216 125
¢ abl: 11 6 alae it 12 30 L7 26 12 20 4 alk 4 3 3 6 ¥¢ 120 81
D 1 al al 3 6 4 6 2 12 5 Hf 5 6 4 4 5 5 48 29
E 2 2 3 4 3 8 if 7 8 16 5 10 39 17 86 51
Total 177 124 68 42 48 40 87 46 68 31 53 26 42 19 18 nee 56 30 617 369
1/ 'Spruce' type consists of Spruce, spruce-hardwood.
'Other': Broadleaf, reproduction, brush, grass, tundra, muskeg.
Source: IBM runs from individual fire reports, besed on 986 fires.
159
72+
+
t;
5
irs) o
o Cs)
Other
2.0
40.0
4.2
20.0 50.0
18.8
42.8
Other Spruce
hours
7.0
33.3
6.2
20.8
ack to contro! within each size class and fue
si
3
e in
Sas
x
Fuel type=
at
Spruce Other Spruce
tall
el
'
Ko
me from
(Av._ 1950-58)
20.5
22.2
Other
33.3
10.0
9o1
4
16.7 33.3
66.7 27.8
10.0 6.4
8.3 23.5
3.7
4.3 15.1
12.5
3
.--Percent of fires accord:
Uoth
22.1
3.8
a SY/
3.7
13.3
Table 52
Terk
13.3
-8
12.8
64.2
st
sii
0
rr)
«0
0
©
fav)
oA
100.0
200.0
=
y
Summar-
160
based on 986 fires.
<
sy
re report:
cast
pruce-hardwood.
z
brush, grass, tundre, muskeg.
<
Spruce, s
tion,
ri
e produc
be
‘
ists o
M runs from individual
ype cons
5
typ
Ais
e
Coded I
'Spruc
i.8)
a
&
i/
Source:
Table 55..--Percent of fires according to time from attack to control within each time class and fuel type
Time in hours
Final
= QO -1 12 2-3 3 - = 2 - 24 24 - 48 48 - 7 72+
ee 2 aL aaace 7 :
poet Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other
May
A 36.4 42.8 20.0 2S 6.2 6275 350 15.8
B 50.0 49.0 60.0 62.5 50.9 40.0 39.4 26.3 31.6 33.3 20.0 16.6 22.3 25:0
Cc 11.4 8.2 15.0 25.0 18.8 33.3 39.4 52.6 42.1 55.6 50.0 a Baa 50.0 33.4
D 5.0 25.0 USO. Lone 21.0 10.0 UGA 2252 33.3
E Ome 6.7 3.0 Bio 5nd Lied, 20:0 66.7 44.4 25.0 100 100 33.3
June
A 58.3 A5 TPS IPOS exis Sas Eaae OF 4.8 18.8 3.0
B 33.3 40.5 66.7 14.3 61.1 45.4 38.1 43.8 27.3 Tet SL,.2 20.0 14.3 12.0
Cc 6.7 11.9 ab eae $5.8 22.2 18.2 52.4 18.7 36.4 2S Slice 22.3 40.0 14.3 20.0 4.0 20.0
D 2.4 21.4 5.6 18.2 4.7 Nese elie 38.5 16.8 33.3 Gah 23.6 30.0 16.0 20.0
EB BLESS Yical Oia: Bee, esa! 30.7 18.8 44,4 33.3 42.8 50.0 100 68.0 60.0
July
A 70.8 60.8 42.1 33.3 18.2 OF1s S250 a) 14.3 25.0
B 2ilfed 32.1 BH est) 44.5 72.7 45.4 32.0 50.0 30.0 28.36, 35.2 fl. 25:0 42.8 = Pb.Q) 12.5 10.0
Cc oat Ties 1 L 36.4 24.0 40.0 60.0 BPed 65.5 14.3 18.8 50.0 12.5 10.0
D Or 11.8 14.3 18.8 28.6 20.0
E niibea 9.1 12.0 LOS 200 14.3 11.8 37.4 14.3 100 75.0 60.0
August
A 88.0 80.0 36.4 33.3 66.7 25.0 50.0
B 4.0 20.0 54.5 66.7 66.7 AsyeX0) 100 50.0 50.0 1D 30 Zoo
C 4.0 Fal 33.3 33.3 40.0 260° 50.0 100 25.5 100 25.0 60.0
D 4.0 16.7 10.0 25'./5
E 33.3 50.0 50.0 2550 75.0 40.0
Summary
A 60.5 49.2 29.4 DORON eLAS5 12.5 13.8 13.0 15 3.2 aliens) 5.4 971:
B 31.6 41.1 60.3 42.8 60.4 40.0 40.2 39.2 30.9 19.4 34.0 34.6 21.4 26.3 BYE) Se) GLOz8 3.3
(¢] 6.2 Bi:9 8.8 26.3 14.6 30.0 34.5 37.0 38.2 38.7 37.7 15.4 26.2 2120) 163% Ofso.- LOT 23.3
D -6 Ate} 125 7-1 12.5 10.0 6.9 4.3 17.6 16.1 13.2 19.2 14.3 2150) 2222) 8.9 16.7
B baal 4.8 ise) 4.6 Bowed a8 22.6 13.2 30.8 38.1 26.3 55.6 54.5 69.6 56.7
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
1/ 'Spruce' type consists of Spruce, spruce-hardwood.
'Other': Broadleaf, reproduction, brush, grass, tundra, muskeg.
Source: Coded IBM runs from individual fire reports, based on 986 fires.
161
Table 54.--Forward behavior of fire at time of arrival by percent within each charac-
teristic class and between size classes
(Av. 1950-58)
Winall Smoldering Creeping Runnin Spotting Crownin
size
Fuel typex/
uae Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce Other Spruce</ Spruce&/
May (159 fires)
A 56.0 41.7 Pile6 35.0 4.0 3129 0) 0)
B 56.0 Domo Seg 55.0 ay 25 (0) 40.9 66.7 66.7
C 4.0 PAA) 29.7 20.0 24.0 eab 30.0 O
D 4.0 0) Bye! O 4.0 AD 0) 4
B O O eel 10.0 LGLO 13.6 0) DOR
June (266 fires)
A 60.6 60.5 24.4 24.0 ile (jamie 8.0 2 Ey5(0) eal
B Loe lige 43.9 32.0 29.2 8.0 Te 5 18.8
C ore 6jedls TESTS 20.0 TOD 24.0 25.0 18.8
D 3.0 Ona 4.9 ave (0) 9.8 16.0 iD W255)
B 4.9 Great TO) a3 ©) 24.4 44.0 25.0 46.8
July (232 fires)
A 80.0 40.8 SD 20.0 10.3 5S ORO 14.3
B 9.2 AES) 38.1 44.0 48.3 PALO) O 4.8
C Tea Boe Tegal 20.0 AO) Th 41.6 6) 14.3
D 0) (.4 4.8 0) O 5.3 Day) 55)
E Sill iad 14.3 16.0 Ade Tf 26.3 215) 50) asad
August (87 fires)
A LOD 66.7 56.3 20.0 14.3 6) O O
B PAO AS Pade) Sal sre 40.0 42.9 20.0 100 33.9
C PAR) 8.3 apehs 5) 40.0 42.8 60.0 O 66.7
D 0 O O 0) 0) 20.0 ) 0
BE O O O O 0) 0) O 10)
Summary all months (744 fires)
A 69.8 WyLyal 30.9 Do We 16.9 25.0 6.8
B 19.4 25-0 39.0 PW es 41.2 Pea SD Pe 0) 16.9
C 6.5 526 IL TCATS PUSS fare 619) PAGES) Tey af askew
D EG Nears Healt 4.0 4.9 9.9 5 LOR
a Gl Sell Tigee alyz35(0) 19.6 26.8 18.8 47.4
1/ 'Spruce' type consists of Spruce, spruce-hardwood.
"Other': Broadleaf, reproduction, brush, grass, tundra, muskeg.
2/ Only scattered occurrences of spotting and crowning occur in the fuel type.
‘Other' since it is composed mostly of grass, tundra, and brush.
Source: Coded IBM runs from individual fire reports.
162
Table 55 .--Cost of protection by Bureau of Land Management, 1950-58—
Year
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
Av.
Place
Alaska
Other states
Cost of protection in dollars
Pre-
Suppression
143,529
194,023
198,516
210 ,003
230 ,695
247,324
287,813
£94,911
$95,551
£44,685
Pre-
Suppression
66
34
Suppression
6,428
89,139
157,946
180 ,588
Alo, CLS
£59,941
192,606
584,000
1,875,643
395,783
1950-58)
Suppression
60
40
Total
149,951
£83,162
556,262
o90 591
506,413
487 ,265
440,466
Sto Ld
2,271,194
640 ,491
Total
Cost
62
38
Percent of acreage protected and total protection costs
1/
Cost/acre
(fraction of cent)
Other
a cee states
ON Om 0.34
we wale
6 Boa
pleii 218
oR wg.
Rraye el
20 Ge
nog . 50
SOM .80
Acreage
1/ Fiscal Year Data.
163
Based on 225 million acres protected.
not include contract protection costs.
Does
Annual Reports of the Director, BLM (Statistical Appendix),
DPSU/63
A
ed
ay
‘if .
458 i 4 Teeg tes
a 7 K. f i
BES RAT 44 ‘
oe
seed
Veseees err aeae
Fis es
y
ee, ee tere
Pre a
Heoaeea eee
BS cats
3 Pie
Snr y ys eens.
ch cheb ape
= Sarena ah
SSNS
oat
>)
em
ae
Pel pr eeet pate et
a se Fe
siesenns see
ote
.
. mt tee $ : ce 4 eirheerrecare
cae ren975, SPhebs : <0 : y sacked
AREER Se 2" oe
SSNS
Ard Cece ret | ; Mew ke
specie 22-408 © ck prs et “e Se SE ecm 3 Mies bly tae
* -s te bier in 2 m ay tart +
Sate WE SEARS SRE WR ST “i ‘ q ; : <i
aa
nad ha eet
Srnenonc
at . ta ere
cast