Skip to main content

Full text of "Gluten quality and the effect of dilution of wheat flours with starch"

See other formats


University  of  Alberta  Librai 


0  1620  3416684  1 


GLUTEN  QUALITY  AND  THE  EFFECT  Off  DILUTION 


OF  WHEAT  FLOURS  WITH  STARCH 


John  William  Hopkins 


Department  of  Field  Crops 


University  of  Alberta 
Edmonton,  Alberta 
August,  19^0 . 


urns 

otimsshmis 

WMinasis 


GLUTEN  QUALITY  AND  THE  EFFECT  OF  DILUTION  OF 
WHEAT  FLOURS  WITH  STARCH 


John  William  Hopkins 
Department  of  Field  Crops 


A  THESIS 

submitted  to  the  University  of  Alberta  in 
partial  fulfilment  of  the  requirements  for 
the  degree  of 

MASTER  OF  SCIENCE 


Edmonton,  Alberta 
August,  1930 


aiiiAqoH.  max II IV,  ndoT> 


lei  ..  "  ’  .  ■ 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 
in  2018  with  funding  from 
University  of  Alberta  Libraries 


8IEI2HT  A 

ai  ala eol-L  to  '/J  iaaevi&u  eiii  07  bet  3  imauc. 
Tot  3^ri9ir©^t0p8rr  stitt*  to  tnanilxtlf/i  Lzlt*xnq 
to  sexual  erii 

30H3XQ8  10  HITBaM- 


b  i  'i  e  x  Ia  t  no  i  n  oaO  1 
Or  01  t  1 8JA0I/A 

https://archive.org/details/glutenqualityeffOOhopk 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 


Page 


Introduction .  1 

Review .  4 

Details  of  proposed  investigation .  7 

Exper  imental . , .  9 

Preliminary  experiments . 9 

Gluten  quality  and  decrease  in  loaf  volume 
per  unit  decrease  in  protein  content .  14 

Starch  dilution  and  diastatic  activity, ...  18 

Experiments  involving  the  stimulation  of 
gas  production . 22 

Discussion  of  results,  and  conclusions .  54 

Summary., . 57 

Acknowledgements . . 58 

References . 59 


BTIEMOO  10  SJcIAT 


egB'I 


. . * 

. . . .  .  .  ,  . . •  ■:  ;  Yv 

,  ■•  i  &  y  3  i  :r  a  e  v  .•  £  I.  b  v  e  c  q  o  u  c  1  o  a  I  i  B  A  stt 

,  .  .  . . ,  a . .  .C&J.  .esc  ::  •; 


.  .  ,  ;  ,  . ,  . 

8;yyXo¥  “iboX  xii  esae-ioao  Jbita  y^xXbbo  necrnXO 


81  ; i  . 

to  nolYBlufiiid'a  entf  anivIo-rxU  s^xieitii  leqxA 

.  .  . 

.......  . 


Sr 


. 


£r 


aeoiYriotevI 


LIST  OF  FIGURES. 


Figure 

Figure 

Figure 

Figure 

Figure 

Figure 

Figure 

Figure 

Figure 

Figure 


Page 


1.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  with  flour  diluted 

with  various  starches  11a 

2.  Decrease  in  loaf  volume  with  dilution  of 

selected  series  of  flours  15a 

3.  Decrease  in  loaf  volume  with  dilution  of 
flour  from  wheat  grown  after  Timothy, 

Y/estern  Rye  Grass,  Brome  Grass  and 

Alfalfa  17a 

4.  Decrease  in  loaf  volume  with  dilution  of 
flour  from  Marquis,  Red  Bobs  No.  222, 

Huron  and  Vermilion  wheat.  Baked  by 
ordinary  method  23 a 

5.  Decrease  in  loaf  volume  with  dilution  of 
flour  from  Marquis,  Red  Bobs  No.  222, 

Huron  and  Vermilion  wheat.  Baked  with 
the  addition  of  0.001  per  cent  potassium 
bromate  23b 

6.  Variation  in  response  to  bromate  with 
dilution  of  flour  from  Marquis,  Red  Bobs 

No.  222,  Huron  and  Vermilion  wheat  23c 

7.  Effect  of  addition  of  varying  amounts  of 
takadiastase  on  the  diastatic  activity  of 

the  four  experimental  flours  26a 

8.  Effect  of  addition  of  varying  amounts  of 

malt  extract  (200  deg.  Lintner)  on  the 
diastatic  activity  of  the  four 
experimental  flours  26b 

9.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the  addition  of 
varying  amounts  of  maltose  +  0.05  per 
cent  ammonium  phosphate  to  the  original 

and  diluted  flour  -  Marquis  3la 

10.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the  addition  of 
varying  amounts  of  maltose  +  0.05  per 
cent  ammonium  phosphate  to  the  original 

and  diluted  flour  -  Red  Bobs  No.  222  3lb 


. 


Dei  :j  lib  yjoIi  noil  benxgtao  oeiuirl ov  'Xco..;  .1 

aaxloiBia  aooxiBT  ill  iw 

i;  . ;  .  o.i  i  xv;  •  o .o/I .  v  co  ■  .  -  '.-?o0  ,  d 

aix/olt  10  aeiies  befcelee 

‘I  .  r  j  j .  £  ;  '  :  1  ?  ..  "  1  ;  .  1  .  .  0 1-OSCl 

^v'di omMT  islls  a woiq  mozt  molt 

bas  asoxi)  .eiooio  .  ,  seaiC  3y;H  irxeoseW 

stlstlA 

i  ©xmfXo  ? 

f  1,1  .  c acfofa  -Gr:  .--1.  x/jc-lt 

. 

b  on  1  sin  ^ibii  db  10 

' 

<SSS  ,o!  edoE  osk  taJfcjjpisM  1,011  molt 
ililw  I)93IbE  ,  1b©i1w  nolIlxaieY  or-B 
fneo  1  I  .0  1  '  ' ...  o 

©IBIEOIC! 

. 

j0i /cod  ^oiioov  0.. ...  o\.;-  ,  .  .•  .  -• 

. 

io  ilxviios  oxoBiaBio  arfl  no  saMC'a&jtbsd.sZ 
siijoll  lalnem/.io-pc©  iuot  erfl 

to  alniJCoiB  oxxjiviBY  to  i.L.o  0  10  toelxO  *6 
©ill  no  ; lenlniJ  .&©&  001;  losilxe  llsro 
1JJCX  Silo  to  wB  Diosloolf) 

axtfoit  XbI ire/n J: xsqx© 

. 

I  : 

Isn  13x10  exll  ol  ©larfqeoxlq  iminomijj  ineo 
aisjpiBU  ~  zucli  betullb  bn& 

I O V  tBO J  . 

. 

lanigxio  erf  j  oi  ©iBflqaorfq  MLiiaamm  Ineo 

-  ,  .  .0  uli£  ■ 


■ 

aiiiil 

©inqi/t 

oiioi'l 

> 

eii/oit 

©'tUgi’E 

311/3x1 

913X3  n 

e 3  I'd 


LIST  OF  FIGURES  (Continued). 


Page 


Figure  11.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the  addition 
of  varying  amounts  of  maltose  +  0.05 
per  cent  ammonium  phosphate  to  the 
original  and  diluted  flour  -  Huron 


Figure  12.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the  addition 
of  varying  amounts  of  maltose  -»•  0.05 
per  cent  ammonium  phosphate  to.  the 
original  and  diluted  flour  -  Vermilion 

Figure  13.  Maximum  loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the 
addition  of  maltose  +  0.05  per  cent 
ammonium  phosphate  to  the  original 
and  diluted  experimental  flours, 
plotted  against  protein  content 


Figure  14.  Loaf  volume  obtained  by  the  bromate 
method,  minus  maximum  loaf  volume 
obtained  by  the  addition  of  maltose 
and  ammonium  phosphate,  plotted 
against  protein  content 


3lc 


3ld 


3le 


32a 


, 


■'  :: a j.L si;  ccibcg-b  -ocLqcBy  lo 

ec  j  oX  e^Bxlgocac;  iriL*ine.-aais  dnso  -leer 
olr  nowH  -  ‘liioXl  XejxjXiiD  fma  Xb&XbX'IO 

Xo  v  • 

# 

©:;,]•  iyj  etfBdqaciiq  iax/XxicnsiiB  jnso  rr©q  • 

- 

. 

. 

XBiiX&ivc  edS  CO  ©CfBCLqEOIiq  UlicXxiOiX^; 

ta‘ii?oXl  iBdHSHi’xaqx©  betsjllb  Lxib 
©X?  XfiMnoo  ixiecro'rq  XaniBqB  x>©d,JoXq 

* 

aiiiiiXov  tBoX  nujmixani  amt  hi:  .  dobjoib 
aaod'XBin:  to  ncitibbB  su'd'  qo  l)©ni.eXdo 
i>©tfcroIq  te$jwiqaoiiq  noil acmm  b ns 
bX~  oiieXnco  nisXoiq  daoiiB^B- 


GLUTEN  QUALITY  AND  THE  EFFECT  OF  DILUTION  OF 
WHEAT  FLOURS  WITH  STARCH. 

By  John  William  Hopkins . 


INTRODUCTION 

Ever  since  the  discovery  that  the  peculiar  suitability 
of  wheat  flour  for  bread-making  was  the  result  of  the 
characteristic  protein  mixture  known  as  gluten,  this 
fraction  of  the  flour  has  been  subject  to  extensive 
examination  by  cereal  chemists. 

It  was  early  recognized  that  gluten  content  must 
play  an  important  part  in  determining  the  baking  " strength” 
of  any  particular  flour,  but  during  the  first  decade  of 
the  present  century  it  became  apparent,  through  the 
observations  of  numerous  workers  in  this  field,  that 
although  the  best  bread-making  flours  were,  in  general, 
those  containing  the  greatest  proportion  of  gluten,  never¬ 
theless  variations  in  the  "quality"  or  physical  condition 
of  the  gluten  from  different  flours  often  occurred.  Gluten 
quality  was,  in  many  cases,  just  as  important  as  gluten 
quantity.  More  recent  and  extended  investigations  have 
only  served  to  strengthen  this  conclusion;  thus  Bailey 
(1,  pp.  258-60)  gives  an  account  of  baking  tests  carried 
out  by  different  workers,  involving  in  the  aggregate 


v.  0.  t  0.  VO£OTJ|  l*.:??  C  MA  dT l,LoOO  OTJO 

. 


,  "■  ;  o,  .  on  .  -  '  ioe  .  0" 

flue  '  -  t  siJ&'  3  EtJ 

snt  to  cf'Xmoso  ,  •••:  3iii^30J-&Basid‘  tel:  xroXl  cfoadw  to 

riilj  . , noo no.!::;  s*>  xwoL::-i  3*xjj3  :v.:,.n  ro::od’07iq  oiiraisefr  Ostade 

o v I. ade*tzc'  oX  .to  HJuc*  ;"oed  oo-..  a.  'ell:  3.ot  aoisos'zt 

,  ::.,  0  3  :  ...•:,  0/  £  0  V:  o  .  '  '  :-  7; -3 

tne  trico  netnio3  tadt  ,bo.ti: •!:>•'’ oo*i  ^Itas  asv  ,rT 
'  ■■  ;  >  •••:  3  ■■iilz-y.  r  £■  txioo  :•  on;  j  - ■•■:■:.■  •;:  o.  non.  vnox  :ib  vsXq 

on.  sbzo&h  tatit  exit  %3.1+ixb  tod  t ’molt  •vs.to .:£<isg  vr£3  to 
i  I  .  t  :  .  ■ , ' 

todn  .ndo £i  a i >?t  > ■  3*19:0x0.;  a.n.;anoi'jri  to  sno..dta/o;:oado 

** 

' -rrevsxi  <*:iet.;n 

J  3  i  -  tbt  30J  . 

♦  •  O'  oao  oaroodi  on.7,0.  nxo.do  ,00  on:  0.000  oOt  to 

’  ••■  ’■••■  ;i  '  •  .0  ._  ■■■•,  -  23  O0100  . n 'ao  0 '  oo;nn.o:  .not  .  000  j  color  oorp 

o"  ■1"o: .  o:  o  .  .03  '.o.:  iooooxoo  0000.  ;  a/ddioosop 
o-  ;  0.0,00  ;  0  0..  nnno;.:  0;  t  0  or  soldo /a  ;r  on  t&V”'iee  \Lz O 

'••  '•  ■■'■a  '  .  ’  •.:■  ■  0  .'••  o  i'Oo  no  vs. ,  .:..-0v':?  .0:  1 1  : 

■'•••'  -  X  "  .  ,00300.,  on  ooomeidi o'j  o(i  toe 


several  hundred  samples  of  flour  grouped  according  to 
protein  content.  The  results  indicate  that  when  the 
averages  of  a  sufficient  number  of  samples  are  considered, 
the  order  of  gluten  content  is  the  same  as  that  of  loaf 
volume,  although  individual  flours  were  found  in  each 
group  which  varied  in  baking  quality  more  or  less  widely 
from  the  mean  of  their  group.  The  results  also  show, 
however,  that  comparisons  must  be  restricted  to  flours 
of  the  same  grade,  since  equal  amounts  of  protein  in 
flours  of  different  grade  were  not  in  general  of  equal 
value  in  loaf  production;  in  other  words,  the  quality 
of  the  protein  in  the  lower  grades  of  flour  was  inferior. 
It  is,  therefore,  obvious  that  some  method  whereby  the 
quality  of  the  gluten  in  any  particular  flour  might  be 
estimated  would  be  of  the  greatest  value. 

"Quality"  of  course  is  not  an  absolute  characteristic 
of  any  material,  but  is  a  purely  relative  term  denoting 
the  suitability  of  the  material  under  consideration  for 
some  particular  purpose.  For  this  reason  actual  baking 
tests  must  always  remain  the  final  court  of  appeal  in 
the  matter  of  gluten  quality.  Such  tests  are,  however, 
laborious,  time-consuming,  and  require  a  relatively 
large  amount  of  material.  More  serious  objections  are 
the  possible  complication  of  comparisons  due  to 
variations  in  other  factors,  especially  diastatic 
activity,  and  the  difficulty  of  separating  effects 


o;  obIosobos  SsqxrcTs  ouorx  to  eolonss  becbaud  Ls'ieves 
odd  jfuiw  d-fixlcT  9^3Di.oni:  atflx/aai  exit  ,  tnatnco  aletoiq 
ti>ei3&tsn oo  sib  aslcpiea  to  ladtoum  tueioitti/B  b  to  8833*19 vs 
tool  to  S3  ewB8  sxid  ax  txxet&o©  neJx/JCg  to  10610  -sour 

jobs  ;J:  boi/oX  9T8W  3'ix/oXt  Isooi vital  ogncoijlo  , esa;Iov 
v loo or  ascl  t\  eioxtr  ^axlaop  aniolBd  .a:i:  loir xsv  xCoiiiw  qi/oig 
.  B  on  o-Uo  ,:  00  ebb  .  O..  no;.  lie.UO  to  0,33/r  '  :OOTt 

eiuc  it  o:f  rot ©xitrai  so  taxis:  3  no  ex  *100:000  -taxlt  t  <19r9wQ.fi 
£il  axed o*iq  to  ocotx;ox)-j  oBi/pe  ©oiola  4 oh3fxg  &m&s  exit  to 
iBups  to  laienes  nx  don  01  aw  ©ixsig  $am:sYz  J;Jo  to  aii/olt 
vir.-om  silt  ?a£ior  leodo  Hi  ixioir ouho*m  tao!  jr  sulsv 
.  loi-iatiri  8.6 w  *iijc It  to  a  860:1.3  xawol  exit  nx  ntadoio  exit  to 
onj  ^dsasiiw  i>oil3  m  exioa  taxid  si/oivdo  ,eictsoeiJB  ,e.x  do! 
ad  doioim  *moXt  o.s luoirfora  ^ns  ixx  0300X3  exit  to  yiijjsx/p 
*  sifXs1/  deeds-oro  silt  to.  ecf  Mi;oj  oedBsxids© 
.oVoX‘T3oobhs;io  sooXosdB  .as  tort  at  ©torero  tc  -op  Xisup" 

• 

oox  noldBiebienoo-  *xe5axr  xoo ledsnx  exit  to  qd  tlidsdina  sal 
-VLj.otsc  ioodcp-  :o:o,o3  siiid  ocol  . eaoqxuo  iBiocidisci  erios 
"■  •-o':..-.p.-  to  t*moo  iBfit t  exit  aisn©*x  spswle  dsxist  sda©d 

'"■  o,X  .vdils*ip  ned :il>3  to  i&ddB&:  ©rid 
SOri/pOO  SuB  ,  OO.XoOaiJ.CO-eOii;0  ,01/OX^XOdBl 
X  o'  O  ;,  ...  ..  p  00  £198  610: r  „  XstOOdBIU  >0  fUfJOtSB  ©S'lal 

or  too:  oxo  .oo:e  roroo  to  ooidBotlquio©  ©left  a  8  oq  sift 
oidadsBit)  YllBiosqae  ? aiodoet  lerido  xrx  sncidBiiBY 
so  09 1 to  gni tsTsqea  to  Ytinoi ttx6  exit  bos 


f  'X 

©Y9WCX1 

t91B  3d  SI 

3d 

^J.9  vi 

tBl©*!  B  t 

■j  '1 , 

Ytt^ttoa 


produced  by  the  quality  of  the  gluten  from  those  the 
result  of  its  concentration,  since  in  practice  both 
quantity  and  quality  usually  vary  simultaneously.  There 
has,  therefore,  been  a  constant  search  on  the  part  of 
cereal  chemists  for  some  comparatively  simple  determination 
which  would  be  an  infallible  indication  of  gluten  quality: 
an  ideal  which  has  not  yet  been  attained. 

The  investigation  now  to  be  reported  represents  an 
attempt  to  modify  the  usual  baking  test  in  such  a  way  as 
to  render  it  capable  of  revealing  those  differences  in 
the  baking  value  of  different  flours  which  are  due  to 
quality,  as  opposed  to  quantity,  of  gluten.  It  was 
proposed  to  dilute  portions  of  the  flour  with  starch  as 
required  to  bring  all  flours  in  a  test  series  to  definite 
and  comparable  protein  contents,  and  to  bake  the  original 
flours  and  several  such  dilutions.  There  seemed  then  to 
be  two  possible  ways  of  interpreting  the  results:  (1) 
by  the  falling  off  in  loaf  volume  per  unit  decrease  in 
protein  content;  (£}  by  the  absolute  loaf  volume  at  given 
protein  contents.  The  first  way  being  independent  of 
absolute  volume,  it  seemed  at  the  time  justifiable  to 
neglect  diastatic  activity.  The  second  way,  however, 
called  for  methods  of  stimulating  gas  production  such  as 
would  ensure  all  loaves  reaching  the  maximum  volume  which 
the  gluten  was  capable  of  sustaining. 

It  was  realized  that  the  extra  labour  involved  in  the 
proposed  modifications  of  the  baking  test  would  render 


aso di  minis  srid*  to  vtilsi-p  arid*  yd  cooui?o*xq 

,i\toG  eoi'.'  os-iii  Hi  aoni&  taoi$ siineorieo  s,j  to  tlvee? 

•  ■  Loni  ■  %$i£ssjt  .ooo  cStiasup 

y..  juo  ©oft  no  c  :aX3.BGQ  b  rood  ,  sooteootx  tesri 

■  '  mob 

-  •  :;...,_  „;obj  1b  to  •:.  ..bo:  Loai  old  J:  Ilo  ioX  n.e  oc  oioow  doiriw 
.  o.  . .' . .  oo :  r* - e 0  o  3 y  j  on  3 .3  d  o i  ■  i o  X s a L I  o o 
.  3  ad  •••.  ...  %t  •••  f>o;fT/  4i  ad  c4  ~  <:.  i  ■■'■:  .  <  ,i:  ooc u 
o>  .  ;  ,.  .  '3  *3  as:  •/ 33 ;'  0'X;3:-  Ibooo  on:  -tribe-  oj  bai-eiis 

.  .  l 

ocr  etri?  8*i3  lioxn'v  a-ioolt  dnas-ait-Lo  to  ©oIbv  y,  idad  end* 
l  :ro  o  X  »  : •  e X ;;  .  .  t  c  ,  •  ••  j; X  '  •  o y  ■  ■ .  .:•  o o  ~  ■ •  < "  , .  j  <  y X I  iloop 
33  do*i2tz  ri b 1 o  roo.-Ii  exit  to  eiic.tfr'soc  e to. od  Saeoqo'xe; 
c-..  rot.  bat  .. b  box -30  boob  .0  Hi  on  00 It  IXo  ya.yiu  ox  .0  00.  top  ay; 
,'  :  o  bra*  t  ox  030  oboJ  01a  C  nopioro  ,or(3 

s  ,  )  fie  a 

(  .  •  . ' 

aoaeooeL  Sims  oag  ©firolov  t.soX  ni  tto  -^xt  Jt  list  cat  yd 

: 

b  .  s  t  8J 

t  '  —  -  "■  3  03  ,.  X  7  J  B  r  '  .3  ./cotyo. 

-3  Xo  00  ;ic  3  3  V./1: ;  03/  .*-0 '  ;  O  ■  3  /  0 1 }  .0  3  0  3  tO  80  GlU  mi  JXCt  £el  .18  0 

■■  d  .  £  i 

B'-'Ot.  ''."JO":  •:.o  ; 0  BBW  38 -Oily  -3.0j 

--a—,  ,  v.f:  .  •COB.'..:,  ootoc  '.  ■  -.  •  .'  -V  -  .. .  • .:  beJlilBGI  OSO  XI 

<i00i,0*i  diuc-.v  cob  ..  :  ol.-iod  arid*  to  snc X d*B ox t Xaaoqoxxq; 


4 


the  method  unsuitable  for  ordinary  routine  determinations. 
This  objection,  however,  would  not  be  an  insuperable  one 
in  the  case  of  plant  breeders  and  others  to  whom  the 
estimation  of  gluten  quality  in  a  restricted  number  of 
samples  is  often  of  great  importance,  and  here,  it  was 
felt,  the  method,  if  successful,  would  be  of  considerable 
service . 


REVIEW 


The  various  investigations  into  the  nature  and 
measurement  of  gluten  quality  which  have  from  time  to 
time  been  undertaken  or  proposed  fall  naturally  into 
five  main  groups:  chemical,  immunological,  physico¬ 
chemical,  mechanical,  and  actual  baking. 

It  is  not  necessary  for  our  purpose  to  consider  all 

* 

these  aspects  of  the  problem  in  detail,  though  had  more 
satisfactory  results  been  obtained  elsewhere  the  need 
for  the  present  investigation  might  not  have  arisen. 
Suffice  it  to  say  that  it  has  not  so  far  been  found 
possible  to  differentiate  by  chemical  means  between  the 
corresponding  proteins  of  "strong”  and  "weak”  flours, 

(3,  4,  9}  or  to  demonstrate  differences  in  the  relative 
amounts  of  gliadin  and  glutenin,  the  two  main  gluten 
constituents,  in  such  flours,  (15,  16). 

Immunological  reactions,  which  have  so  often  proved 
valuable  in  differentiating  between  proteins,  appear  to 
be  capable  of  yielding  even  less  information  in  this 


,  ■  .  •  ■  •  v  :./•  \.v  . -'tf 

•  [  f  r  „•  C-  8  TyJi:  b  Y;.;  X  Y • :  \Yv‘m/  o.£3.~Y  IX  £8>;0  '3;.W  •*  £ 

lo  nec'i'Tjr: r  C.-s-iDl’id’s©*!  .8  iii  rttxtulg  lo  aoiX-m  Lose 

‘  ,  '•  £  Y  ,  r£ 


fiiw 


jx3  '  ,Y‘  S.:  Y  OcilX  81X01 BeV Y £  BLJCTIXY  0itT 

he  *■  ■ 

•  •:•'■:  •  :  .-X  ,  .Y^;YL::r-iYi«7.Tj-T;i;  t y;.yy:  a\n:‘X 

.  \  X ■  .  ..  ..  ;;  x  .  .  <  ,'.  o .f; .  y  :.  '  .  I-e.Xxe  io 

■  ....  YY  ;.  -  :  .08  OY  ••:>"  Y  YY  "1  ■  \yX  VY’Y  YB006.:1  J  Oil  EX  fl 

■  - 

' 

-•:/ .;  yyyyxy  £jo.tiaexio  ';;c;  eX a i X ne eteext it-  o-j  eldisacq 

-  -  — 

. 

t  "  . 

. 

■•'  "v  rL  '  -  --  i  •••  08  YY.:  X&lilv/  t  8ii0  i  Y088Y  £$0  t%OlOiimSZl 

;  '‘--yy  •  t  •  '•■•:  <-  •:•  aaewXe.  zit  n.k  olctez/Iav 

:  '  . 


connection  them  the  ordinary  chemical  methods .  Thus  Wells 
and  Osborne  (25)  found  that,  using  the  anaphylaxis 
reaction,  the  gliadins  of  wheat  and  rye  could  not  be 
distinguished,  and  also  (26)  that  wheat  gliadin  and 
glutenin  actually  reacted  with  each  other,  though  not 
so  strongly  as  with  themselves. 

Physico-chemical  studies  of  dough  have  led  to  the 
suggestion  (13)  that  gluten  from  a  "weak”  flour  has  a 
lower  rate  of  hydration  and  a  much  lower  maximum 
hydration  capacity  than  that  from  a  "strong"  flour. 
Attempts  to  utilize  the  viscosity  of  flour- in- water 
suspensions,  which  varies  with  the  degree  of  hydration, 
as  a  measure  of  gluten  quality  have  not,  however,  been 
successful  (5,  11).  The  bound-water  method  has  also  been 
applied  to  the  measurement  of  hydration  in  flour  sus¬ 
pensions  (8),  but  any  differences  found  were  too  small  to 
be  used  as  an  index  to  gluten  quality.  Negative 
correlations  have  been  found  (14)  between  loaf- volume 
and  the  ease  with  which  the  gluten  proteins  are  peptised 
by  certain  salt  solutions,  but  the  results  from  a  larger 
series  of  samples  (12)  indicate  that  the  correlation  is 
not  great  enough  to  make  ease  of  peptisation  a  reliable 
index  of  gluten  quality. 

Of  the  various  mechanical  dough- testers  which  have 
been  devised,  the  Chopin  extensimeter  (6)  is  undoubtedly 
the  most  successful.  This  machine  measures  the  ability 
of  a  dough  to  extend  its  area  without  rupturing.  A  good 


' 

aZ?j$l:CilccziB  set  oalau  tajot  { dS ) .  ©frcocfBO  bne 

sc  ton  Mjjoo  .-3v;m  Ibb  f  $?•  do  to  Qtiib&l.iv  out  tno£toasi 
uBBrr.v  <7, silt  (6a )  o&.lb  JIgg  f  ferial  its  Ifc 
,  -:sd$o  aooe  liiw  1  ©7  a©:  %jd.?:udos  .einBlBlo 

.  aaviaci'ieiid’  ixlo  aa  vlsj'oiii'a  c a 
..  a  a  . •  i  .  ...  t'  sail: Bits  Ib-Ago 3 -:  ox.  av,  . 

b  a oti  *iuolt  ,:2£3e-..!?  s  j&o*3$  netx/Ig  larit  { r.l )  notteosgus 

wamlxsn  tcenvcl  xlonoi  b  £>£Xb  a otvSTbYii  to  s$s%  ‘xewol 

... 

’  .-,•  -o:  .'  tc.  a:  a-ocaif  *  3  ea  Id  jzo  n$  dS-zoiOJd^ 

t  HO  1 7 .3 ’ll) Yji  to  69T::©I:  Blit  dtlW  8&£*X BV  XtOlrfW  ,  SHOjt 8fl©q 803 
.  .. 

'-  -  *  ..  ..... 
njolt  ill  ;c.:;tbm:o to  Irtome^x/SBan:  ©ill  oi  callqqs 
-1  .ns  col  s*xew  £nixot.  aeoiwx&ttih  %nj  dud  t  (8 }  sire larxeq 

.  .  J  HB 

esurlov-tsol  asewtal  :>Ij  om/ot  need  even  Bnoltals'rxoo 

. 

‘•f-  —  -  •-•  ^3:  uSi  eiur  t£iicld’.cflo^  7  Is  a  gibO^oo  vd 

i-  j  -  ■••  -  o  a M  ' ...  1  ©v'B olferci:  (SX )  bqI.vm&b  -to  gg  xgss 

o  :10i.  U  BC ...  .Jr.  aq  to  ©S3©  ©BB2X  Ot  XfglfOH©  tBStg  toil 

.  V;UlBlV:  ;.£6  J  '  f.  ~  to  '  '  :  '  1 

•-;V  ••■'-  ■.'  aMslav- j Is ©1  nan cam  eifolTsv  aiil  10 

©-  :  -  *-:i.  o'  /  *i8l9f:Han©0xc  olqonQ  eol  J?osjftr©6  asecf 

.  .  la  fe  .  a  ... . 

£>003  a  .3111^  .  att  hn&txe  ot  xlsoofi  3  to 


6 


relationship  has  been  found  to  hold  between  the  results 
thus  obtained  and  the  loaf-volume  from  baking  tests. 
Unfortunately,  however,  the  apparatus  is  quite  expensive, 
and  in  most  laboratories  not  available. 

Coming  now  to  modifications  of  the  baking  test 
involving  the  use  of  starch,  we  find  that  Bailey  (1) 
gives  an  account  of  experiments  carried  out  by  Jago  in 
which  varying  percentages  of  corn  starch  were  added  to  a 
sample  of  Canadian  patent  flour  containing  16.1  per  cent 
of  dry  crude  gluten,  and  the  resulting  mixtures  baked. 
Each  successive  addition  of  starch  brought  about  a 
diminution  in  loaf  volume.  Bailey  had  himself  carried 
out  a  somewhat  similar  experiment  and  noted  a  steady 
decrease  in  loaf  volume  and  deterioration  in  texture  as 
the  proportion  of  starch  was  increased.  Bailey  and  Le 
Yesconte  (2)  determined  the  effect  of  admixture  of  starch 
upon  the  extensibility  of  dough,  as  determined  by  the 
Chopin  apparatus.  Mixtures  containing  0,  10,  20,  30  and 
40  per  cent  of  starch  exhibited  a  continuously  decreasing 
extensibility,  indicating  that  gas-retaining  capacity 
had  been  impaired  by  the  added  starch.  That  this  was 
actually  the  case  was  demonstrated  by  Johnson  and  Bailey 
(17),  who  added  to  five  portions  of  a  patent  flour  con¬ 
taining  10.32  per  cent  protein,  starch  sufficient  to  give 
mixtures  containing  10,  20,  30,  40  and  50  per  cent  starch 
respectively.  Doughs  made  from  these  mixtures  fell  into  a 
regular  sequence  as  far  as  gas  production  and  loss  of  gas 


-  -  wte  -  '  ■'  bm  -  t  ' 

•  - 

...  .  ■.  '/  or:  ott  .  08  v  500-0  ,  T  i.  3  j  Of  i  if  j.  1 Ot  III  J 

.  vc  :  ::  o  -.o ooon  ni;  roc 

.  -r-,  .  :./  •• :-  :•  to  raio.r^SDXt loom  ot  v/on  ^.o.aooO 

(I)  xdIs.bS.  tzdi '  bn  It  aw  trfc*istf8  to  eeu  axlt  arcJtvIoTnl 

! 

-  • 

, 

, :  .  .  ■ 

3  tjjocz  tilvoc^d  Soisie  to  sYiassocors  iios5i 

.  .  jcs  .  DY 

-  .  .  [C 


toi  •  5  an  .  ■  . 

.  :  .  .  oociot  .  .-.a  o  : i.  cbw  toooor  t  aoJt t'roqciq  etc 

oo3  -rot  :t  mi  ■  ?:  •.'•  to  2  It  1 1  erxa^xe  eiit  aoqjj 
:  * 

•3  o' *  oo  •:.  oo-j::  v  i.^.o  j.cottnoo  o  o$t.Ut:ox8  rlor^&s  to  ;r:;oo  *xec  04 


evi, 


.  .  ,  .  txIMi 

.  ■ 

.  . 

t 

{ 

v  -  '■-••toL'  Me*!*:  eiooi  sifw  -C  . yIo yt t oeqsaT 

•vV  ":J  - o t •■'■ ;v" oo„:  o. ::- •  oe  xat  oo  oo r-oiipae  X0lxr3©'i 


-  7 


were  concerned,  gas  retention  decreasing  with  increasing 
proportion  of  starch. 

Larmour  and  Macleod  (19),  and  Larmour  (18)  have  used 
a  blend  of  forty  per  cent  soft  wheat  flour  and  sixty 
per  cent  of  the  flour  to  be  tested  as  a  supplement  to 
the  ordinary  baking  test  in  order  to  obtain  a  measure 
of  "reserve  strength"  or  blending  capacity.  This  may 
afford  a  satisfactory  means  of  comparing  different 
flours  as  such,  but  makes  no  provision  for  estimating 
with  any  degree  of  exactitude  what  part  of  the  results 
obtained  is  due  to  variations  in  the  quantity  of 
protein,  and  what  to  variations  in  its  quality. 

DETAILS  OF  PROPOSED  INVESTIGATION 

From  the  foregoing  review  it  will  be  seen  that  no 
satisfactory  chemical  or  physico-chemical  method  of 
estimating  gluten  quality  has  so  far  been  found.  The 
experiments  there  referred  to  involving  the  use  of 
starch  were  all  designed  to  demonstrate  the  effects  of 
variation  in  gluten  concentration;  but  the  question 
arose  as  to  whether  information  concerning  the  quality 
of  the  gluten  could  not  also  be  obtained  in  this  way. 

In  particular  it  was  thought  that  if  several  flours  were 
diluted  with  starch,  in  such  a  way  as  to  reduce  the 
protein  content  by  successive  steps,  the  relation  between 
decrease  in  protein  content  and  decrease  in  loaf  volume 
might  prove  to  be  a  linear  one.  The  decrease  in  loaf 


■  ;  3....00  ood  oao  d  ooie -/  oa  tJ&enr:'3  0Hoo  eiew 

,  if.oi.e-j  a  'io  noi  d  q;oiq 

L.e-;  av-d  : d_if ;  ii/cxiTra,!  ina  t  (£1)  x>C3Jo&u  doca  nnciiriaJ 

ot  a  ires  mo  it  doeeilw  3  toso  leer  i  to  basic  & 

o  j  \ . ...8:.- ■■-•■ j:cr e  03  b  3B  oeto©#  eel  od  xuolt  s.:ls  to  caeo  ?eq 

■  . 

, 

.  ...  ' 

•  ..  o' :  ,.e  cot  o:oi:a  itoiq  on  aoiofe/o  ded  ?noira  c.e  a  moll 

adJo-aao:  ©  . .  to  tied  doooo  e&o uidoaxs  to  eoiod  yA*  terjw 

..V  0..30  0  :  O-o  30  d  0...1  '  giio.. ■j.iZBY  <jj  6  0.'  o,i:  o  OOOod  (jO 

.  ,..  r ,  . ...  ..  oo'  .....  o.o  •: o  e  ..  ,  ..  .  ■  c  o  -  ::.;i  • 

_ ; ,  : . . B. ;  J;  .  j.; . - 1_ d 1 U 

.  g  wei-vei 

••  -O'  ooo'.o--  '.'.  .d  o  '  0:.,.  o  o\.o..  joato  .f  ,toc 

- 

o-  .oo o  eoof  .niYloT-ii  of  ba^ei&c:  eioo'j  a-jaemb/isqxe 
.  o  ;  o.f  oro  ., :  o.o I.;. a  ooo;o/  ioooja 

•  •■-Ooo"':  '  ::  o  T;o.  ; no i: $ r.'i tnc* one *.:<  not 0X3  ni  noitBiiav 

-  '  ;•  :.  •  •  -O7'-  ■-  0.1  o  iTOOOOOOOOOti.Xf:  OOfftOllW  0-j  0  3  eo 018 

*  ■•"  "•  --  '  1  o -  00.0  c  00  00  OB  ter:  blaco  ocooioo...  .0  o':  to 

- iV  -  i  ,  ii  tent  0  0.0.0000  .0..;  :iot  1.0  .too. f  txsq;  ril 

'  :-o:  o  t.:..o  .0  ifiooo  at  tiicx£?s  odd  00 ood.fi 

'  ‘  :  :  "  •  -  5  -  -  >  31  e  j‘  3  3  V  i  8  0. 3  0  0  ;03  ^0  j  XI  3-  3  .;.  O'-  0  Ju  0  6  j  0  YC£ 

-•  O::. •..  0 Od  baa  dried oi 00  odsdcoo  o:d  03.00*2096 

'i  '-;  -  '  '  -"ro.'D  eriT  #eno  ooeoil  a  ©c  ct  37000  jn;odfs 


8 


volume  per  unit  decrease  in  protein  content  might,  hov/ever, 
vary  from  flour  to  flour,  the  effects  of  starch  dilution 
being  most  marked  in  those  flours  whose  gluten  was  "weak" 
or  of  poor  quality.  When  it  is  considered  that  the 
greater  part  of  the  Western  Canadian  wheat  exported  to 
Europe  is  used  to  blend  with  home-grown  or  imported 
wheat  of  inferior  quality  in  order  to  improve  the  resulting 
flour,  the  practical  significance  of  any  test  of  quality 
based  on  blending  or  "carrying-power"  becomes  obvious. 

It  is,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  known  that  some  British 
millers  habitually  test  the  quality  of  Canadian  wheat  by 
mixing  flour  milled  from  it  with  home-grown  wheat  flour 
in  proportions  ranging  from  10  to  90  per  cent  Canadian 
wheat  flour,  and  noting  the  resulting  improvement.  As 
a  quantitative  measure  this  is  open  to  the  criticism 
that  no  two  home-grown  wheat  flours  would  necessarily 
yield  the  same  results.  The  use  of  a  standard  starch, 
as  in  the  method  now  proposed  would  not  however  be 
subject  to  this  criticism,  all  results  thus  obtained 
being  truly  comparable.  It  was  proposed,  therefore,  to 
investigate  the  effects  of  starch  dilution  on  flour, 
and  if  possible  to  establish  a  relation  between  such 
effects  and  gluten  quality,  in  the  hope  that  a  method 
for  the  estimation  of  the  latter  might  thus  be  provided. 

It  is  to  be  noted  that  the  British  miller  estimates 
the  quality  of  Canadian  wheat  flour  by  the  improvement 
it  effects  when  added  to  his  home-grown  wheat  flour, 


b 


..  cii  ,  t/tiifij  taefaoo  niatoiq  at  ©asenosJb  tlxm  ieq  oieulq? 
d xioTBla  to  at  oet'ie  exit  ,*111011  g-j  sxao It  flic-it  vtst 
’♦osew*  8bw  netiflg  esorfw  six/oil  98C.fi  t  nx  X>9^*xbcdc  tsois  gnlscf 

ot  ^attoqxe  tBenw  OBl&BjriBO  xttetaeW  arut  to  tiaq  te-laats 
Zc-y'zvc-:  :  *1.0  •locifi-eofo  ;i-tla  eneld  ct  ceaxr  at  eqoxDl 
Snitluae-x  exit  syo'iqmi:  ot  ‘xei^'xo  ni  ^tilBX/p  TolT-etal  to  t©9xiw 
ptlljSijp  to  taOt  10  BOilBOl  ttax.  1  £  IsottOBlQ  Silt  ,  tirO.lt 


••  I 

efiiOG  tddt  nwcxnC  ,toBl  to  'istton  b  83  Ssi  tl 
qcf  tBodw  hbIIbiibQ  to  ^tllBirp  exit  tost  Y^^BXftidsxf  aTeXXiiir 
o  o cl  1  t.jexxw  itwc^s-arool  i  tin  ti  ro-of  heilxm  *ujoXt  qnlxtxn 
iJ  .  ...  ot  G  ..  ...  o'  ■  ©iq 

sA  •  txxsmevo'cqijri  gnltlaa ©i  oiit  it  cur  ibriB  1 100 It  taeii'w 
ooi  oi  si  10  aid  ot  c;.sqo  .0.  ax  fit  a  Ft  x  at  ItxiBup  a 

•;...  ■  a  :Oc-  go  on  blijcij  aoocj.lv  -vox  ro?o-;.  s-emoii  0x1  toll 

91 

X  /ow  Xsaoqoiq  won  Jborltsm  exit  xtl  as 
1 :  o... alo: ■;  ,0.0  atXoffoi  11b  pxaloloiao  siial  ot  10 e;:  too 

:  ., .  •  t]  *8ldfB*  Bq  .  ..  x  : 

» eoolt  no  no  lx  a'.Iil  x.unxxxja  to  stostte  exit  et  xq. tosevoi 
lone  xt9© wted  xfoxtaleo  b  xisxldatae  ot  eldisscq  tl  baa 
l*x  tx.  b  tB. It  •» .,. •..  C  exit  ..  ’  npxllO'Ot  i®ti;Xq  Bit. s  etoett© 
-t  .  x-  x ; ■  x  .,  ax, f  t  c  axioi  *reti3l  alt  to  xxoxtBXJitae  axit  oxt 
.0.  xx’l,;iv  ^  el  11: 1.  ot...  to  ixxx  aril  tad  or  jbef  on  ©cT  ct  ax  tl 


x XO:  xxoooqxiil  8f?f  pd  ‘XJJCXt  tfi 811W  XXB  1.0.8X180  to  vtlOinXp  Silt 
dxxxclx  XX:XXX7  itv; ap^-aina  all  ot  <  e:x  a  fi-aa  s tootle  tl 


9 


whereas  in  the  proposed  method  quality  would  he  estimated 
rather  by  resistance  to  deterioration  on  dilution  with 
starch.  There  is  a  fundamental  difference  in  these  two 
methods,  the  importance  of  which  will  appear  more  fully 
in  later  discussion. 

EXPERIMENTAL 

Preliminary  Experiments 

Preliminary  experiments  were  first  carried  out  to 
determine  the  best  type  of  starch  to  use  as  a  diluent. 
Jago  used  corn  starch.  Bailey  and  Le  Vesconte  (2)  and 
Johnson  and  Bailey  (17)  do  not  state  what  kind  they 
used.  Inasmuch,  however,  as  the  starches  from  different 
species  of  plants  often  vary  considerably  in  their 
physical  properties,  it  was  thought  that  perhaps  actual 
wheat  starch  would  be  the  most  suitable.  A  quantity  of 
a  commercial  patent  flour,  found  to  contain  12.6  per 
cent  of  protein,  was  obtained,  and  diluted  to  a  series 
of  lower  protein  contents  with  five  different  starches. 
These  were  commercial  corn  starch,  starch  prepared  from 
the  original  flour  by  the  method  of  Rask  and  Alsberg  (22), 
one  lot  washed  with  distilled  water  and  one  lot  with  70 
per  cent  alcohol,  and  technical  and  c.p.  wheat  starches 
supplied  by  Eimer  and  Amend.  The  nitrogen  content  of 
these  starches  was  determined,  with  the  following 
results,  which  indicate  a  satisfactory  degree  of  purity. 


,  tL  ‘ 

n©X.,rnIiX  no  •toi«  s'loi'ie&eij  c>?  soiikrt &£&&::  vo  lexises 

, 

Ylxxxx  a  ''i^e-nq®  XHvr  jloixfw  to  aoxiBX'iocnfi:  exit  4 a&odtteirt 

» nc  '  :. .  / c a  X .*  •.  J nl  n  i; 

£SXXU, 

CoxX-dX IxiXxX-;  X~i^£TX —To 

O'l  ixoe  Baln-ixo  X  axis  o%er  atneirii *X3qxe 

- 

X  '  :i  -  .  3X '  .  ex.  on©  /.oliox  .  denser©  nxcs  •,  ■••..:  ov^/V. 

tnlz  tBrfw  otfjsXa  #on  o£  ;VI  j  fillacl  dub  nosaitol 
•X xoxfXn--j; X  .  :xo.;  aa'in'inX©  enX  no  ^svswoif  < non^asnl  *boajj 
Ti:sr.[;j  iii:  xld'&sej&isxxoo  \'xav  necrSo  a d*nslc  Sc  aeiosqs 
:-  ■-•;  o  b/.xco  o.oiij  cngino- i  ano  ,ti  ? xelX'iaoonQ.  InocsTnq 

X'-  ;  xajsno  A  ,  sIdBXina  Xaox-f  ©nx  sd  Mr.ro,;  nonoda  -XBerfw 

-  ■ 

•■-••'■"•  ■  ;  ,  x  i  con. X  or:©  t.o  >:•  ;o,X:-x.,  bow  ..odeo  -  co  do  Xnso 

*  — o;ooo;n  x .  -  :  V:.  XX  svl'x  XXX;;  aono  *  hoc  .riXa^oog  ‘iswol  So 

- 

'  -  .  .  i 

•;v  ncxw  cr ol  one  bxtB  ‘xeSav?  JtelJEUsii)  riXti:;;  Mriaisw  dol  ©no 

. 

» 

X ■  Bi  x ?7o  j  .  ,i.  o X:  8 ii j  ii  X  i:  w  t  £>  err  iiifT o X  si)  a bw  a  eri  o  to  X  a  sa  exf*t 

. 


10 


Table  1.  Nitrogen  content  of  starches. 


Kind  of  starch 

Nitrogen 

content 

7o 

Corn  starch 

0.09 

Starch  from  flour  (by  distilled  water) 

0.06 

Starch  from  flour  (by  70$  alcohol) 

0.05 

E.  and  A.  wheat  starch  (tech.) 

0.05 

E.  and  A.  wheat  starch  (c.p.) 

0.06 

It  was  assumed  that  in  the  processes  incidental  to 
the  preparation  of  these  starches,  any  protein  present 
would  be  denatured;  hence  no  allowance  was  made  for 
protein  in  starches  when  calculating  the  amount  to  be 
used  in  dilutions. 

Sufficient  starch  was  added  to  portions  of  the  flour 
to  reduce  the  protein  to  12.0,  11.0,  10.0  and  9.0  (dry 
basis) ,  series  of  this  nature  being  prepared  using  each 
of  the  five  starches.  The  mixtures  obtained,  together 
with  the  original  flour,  were  then  baked  according  to  the 
following  formula  (all  bakings  being  performed  in  duplicate). 


Flour . 100  grams  (at  13.5$  moisture) 

Yeast .  3  " 

Salt . . .  1  " 

Sugar .  2.5  " 

Water . sufficient 


The  resulting  loaf  volumes  are  shown  in  Table  2 


. 


. . . '  :  - 

..  . 

JftsJtrxco  j 


rlOTSvS  fIG  . 


QO .  0 
OG.  G 

,  0 

60.  0 

c  , 


nooBtfa  nio 0  I 

=  ;xo;'ov-  10  v  6  ,  oo  .0.  ox  ••.: 0  .kooOG  j 

[LcdooiB  Go?  \rtf  }  uon  "  :  gob  oooocrB 

,  o  .  ooox  '  . :  -  .  .  .  x,  , ; 

.  .  '  :  -■  .  G  .  :• 


cG  Ib J  r.obtoat  a-333©oo*2<i  sat  o.;.  j&e^ix;>>3fc  saw  dvl 

:ii.oGooo  \,T-  . rj, qp. o tjx -t 3  .^s.O  Be  ac x G.ao.e go oq  arid' 
10  z  exco-  a:.;v.  oonswoXlB  ext  ooh30  ;  boxx/G  eneb  ed  bljow 
.  oG  xna/cxxri  oil/  ooixoIxiQ  l^e  nerlx  aelooe : ,,  gI  nxoioiq 

.  B<,  ...  •  '0.  i :  •  0  •'  0  '*••  G  j 

o  .  .1  -1  to  2/uj lx -ioq  o'j  Goo.dg  sbw  noT^a  a.icaicxtOi/c 

>  *  -  .  , 

-o/x/  ■  gxLgg'  GGOoeeo:/  h.o  :?;:i  oo  jt ?j.-  Bill  Bo  asix/a  ,  oiasd 
...  -  v  r6ti-:.l'ij0cfo  o  .  riT  .  serU  ••'.  :■:•••'  ev.it  olB  to 

lel../o'  fo/.'l  ox ?• •  \  .Tool/  lo  /xt/'.-  '>1/  .::U\~w 

... 


..•  *  :1  ;  a  ■.  ‘.to  001  >  ,  .  »  ,  .  ,  .  o.  o  .0 

.......... Oeoel 

j:  . 

0.  G  ........  mgxrU 

•Ite  :: /  i  ilzo  . . .  ,  xaOr, 


:  .mods  ®i  mi 


11 


Table  2.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  with  flour  diluted  with 
various  starches. 


Protein 

Loaf  volume 

content 

Corn 

starch 

Starch 

from 

flour 

(dist. 

water) 

Starch 
from 
flour 
(70% 
ale  . ) 

E.  and  A. 
wheat 
starch 
( tech. ) 

E.  and  A. 
wheat 
starch 
(c.p.) 

cc . 

cc . 

cc . 

cc . 

cc . 

12.6 

498 

498 

498 

498 

498 

12.0 

475 

458 

458 

460 

456 

11.0 

433 

444 

432 

425 

422 

10.0 

427 

406 

410 

376 

395 

9.0 

380 

382 

369 

342 

371 

These  results  have  also  been  plotted  (Figure  1} . 

In  the  case  of  some  of  the  starches  the  points  thus 
obtained  are  rather  irregularly  distributed,  but  in  each 
instance  a  straight  line  could  be  fitted  to  them.  It 
will  be  seen  that  the  rate  of  decrease  of  loaf  volume 
with  dilution  is  not  the  same  for  the  different  diluents. 
The  technical  wheat  starch  supplied  by  Eimer  and  Amend 
gave  the  line  of  steepest  slope  and  also  showed  the 
least  scattering  of  points.  It  was,  therefore,  decided 
to  use  this  in  all  future  experiments. 

Determinations  of  the  resistance  of  certain  of  these 
starches  to  diastatic  action  was  made  by  the  method  of 
Malloch  (El)  .  Similar  determinations  were  also  performed 
in  the  case  of  the  flour  and  the  dilutions  of  it  made  with 
Eimer  and  Amend  tedhnical  wheat  starch. 


ill  iw  betisllb  wo  It  xltiw  JbeniatcFo  aemxxlev  tBOl 

a  ex  i  oia  t  a  e  is o  £ *1.3  v 


,  a  ©icfaT 


emuiov  tsoJ 

•  - - 1 

nistorxt  S 

, 

tseriw 

rioxste 

.  .  ■ 

. 

t,89XiW 

florists  ; 
(.xxoet) 

florist  8 
xrxorxt 
*ix/olt 

C\V-t  j 

{ .  oXb 

XfOTiStB  | 
mo ‘it  \ 
inori ! 
.  tsio ; 
(•10  rsw 

xinoO 

florists 

tnetnoo 

. 

,  00 

.  00 

.  00 

, 

* 

BQj> 

Q9b 

se^ 

se* 

ee* 

a. ax 

dd£ 

08  £ 

• 

88£ 

85* 

av* 

o,sx 

3S1> 

S?£ 

M* 

??*  : 

o.xx 

dQE 

d\P. 

01* 

00* 

?a*  - 

0.  ox 

IVF: 

Ef>£ 

ea? 

S8r 

08? 

o.e 

# 

suxlt  atntoq  ©fit  eexlorESta  sift  to  emoa  to  ess 0  exit  nl 
.  .  ' 
tl  .©exit  ot  Xettit  acf  Mx/oo  oral  &  s  eonstexil 

SISWIOV  tBOl  lO  ©8B81093  t-.  -8-3*1  ©XLi;  tBXlt  063  8  9Cf  II iw 

> 

r 0©;-x- •  3XLO  *1© mix  vcf  5©  ilqqx/a  xionsta  tesciw  isoinrfoet  exlT 
e.,:  .-  Iev;uxi3  osls  I* ns  ego  is  isaqeets  to  eail  ©nir  ©tbs 
.  •  ■  .  ...  • 

* atssuxftocsa  ©‘intirt  I  Is  nx  sixit  ecu  ct 
oiexit  to  nijstrceo  to  ©ousts  £s©‘X  exit  to  snoitsnlnrieteG 

to  6  exit  ©ox  slit  si>B0i  sbw  noitoa  oitBtajsis  ot  sexlonsta 

-  ’  - 

rit.Xv  9 Dsxrx  ii  to  snoxtjLfliJb  exit  00s  rn.ro ft  exit  to  easo  exit  rxi 

.ixortBta  tserCw  iBoItulbst  6xi©mA  Jdxxb  rxaniS 


11a 


Figure  1.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  with  f}.our  diluted 
with  various  starches. 


-  12  - 


Table  3 .  Starch  resistance  of  flour,  starches  and 
starch  dilutions. 


Material 

Starch 

resistance 

Starch  from  flour  (washed  by  distilled  water) 

40 

Starch  from  flour  (washed  by  70  per  cent 
alcohol) 

39 

Wheat  starch,  E.  and  A.  (tech.) 

151 

Flour,  12.6  per  cent  protein 

38 

Flour,  12.0  per  cent  protein  (diluted  with 

E.  and  A.  wheat  starch  (tech.) 

34 

Flour,  11.0  per  cent  protein  (diluted  with 

E.  and  A.  wheat  starch  (tech.) 

33 

Flour,  10.0  per  cent  protein  (diluted  with 

E.  and  A.  wheat  starch  (tech.) 

37 

Flour,  9.0  per  cent  protein  (diluted  with 

E.  and  A.  wheat  starch  (tech.) 

38 

The  figures  for  starch  resistance  represent  one 
thousand  times  the  reciprocal  of  the  number  of  milligrams 
of  maltose  produced  by  10  grams  of  dry  material  when 
digested  for  one  hour  at  27°  C.  with  0.03  grains  of  taka- 
diastase.  It  will  be  noted  the  starch  prepared  by  washing 
out  from  the  flour  had  the  same  resistance,  within  the 
limits  of  error  of  the  method,  as  had  the  original  flour. 
The  Eimer  and  Amend  wheat  starch  had  a  much  higher 
resistance,  but  the  resistance  of  the  mixtures  in  which 
it  was  used  as  a  diluent  did  not  differ  significantly 
from  that  of  the  original  flour.  This  seeming  anomaly 


as  do*t 


xQ  60JSBTBXB©4 


■ 

floxsta 


10' ' 


6013 


'*%  I 


IdX<X8?£?.: 


VF: 


%e$®w  belLtf sib  yd  bert&sw )  % 


d  y 


Fiwo  *z&q  OF  yd  Oeiasw:  tmoXO  moil  rioiB^E  j 

(Iciioolaj 


iei 

* 

. 

.  Z  t£C©*K$#a  tsaxlW 

nievovg  tneo 

■  eq  X.  vxol 

£V< 

j  dtiw 

bsfuXib ) 

nXetottej  tneo 

vvv  j.ZX  wvvXZ 

. 

J.v  vvv:  ,  ±  .  .vv  . :: 

SF 

1  dv  iw 

betulib j 

ni'8#orxq  trxeo 

reeq  0 .11  ,  to  olf 

t 

*  deed'  ■  vLvvvla 

loevv  .  ..  .  v  ,  :  • 

dtiw 

„b©t  ul  s.b ) 

nlstotxc  tneo 

, 

1 

.  -lav  r )  . 

•  A 

8?v 

j  rif  iw 

Xsdvjlvv  } 

rviet  o-io  tneo 

, 

JL _ _ 

. 

'  a. ..  v  .  ..  v .. '  a  .  Z 

axxo 

tznaoiq.s'i 

BOiTStaiS 

• 

aovvvui  eviT 

Sivvvv  ilvw  vo  veavivn  six  tv  Ivv.v;  •  t  e  '  v  eav  aenitf  biiBauctii 

vow  ......  :.0i  V8  7  yJZ  V;U'  tv-  VV,^TV.  01  yd  Ivoulcvv  GZQ$  Ism  to 

o 

•  m  1  ....  .' 

.  .  ,  . 
aiiv  .vjiiiVxw  ^©onaJaisex  dies  a  ovlt  bad  Ttroll  veil  avart  ^jjo 

. 

vvdgiv  dosm  b  ijjsii  do*iB$&  taeaw  aaoiHA  boB  aw  IT  ©rIT 
v;  xx:  .ev'V: ':.  ..  ovv  to  ©ona^aiaei  ©at  v  wtsiae*! 

v  Tvwo  'teYzib  tort  XXJb  vrtavrlxd  a  aa  v  v-vu  aav  ti 

. 


-  13  - 


may  be  explained  by  assuming  that,  since  only  a  small 
proportion  of  the  total  starch  available  is  converted 
into  sugar,  there  was  present,  even  in  the  highest 
dilutions,  an  excess  of  the  more  easily  hydrolyzed 
flour  starch  over  the  total  amount  capable  of  being 
converted  into  sugar  by  the  enzyme.  This  flour  starch 
might  then  be  supposed  to  be  attacked  by  the  enzyme  in 
preference  to  the  more  resistant  starch  used  as  a 
diluent . 

The  diastatic  activity  of  these  mixtures  was  also 
determined,  using  Malloch1 s  (20)  modification  of 
Rumsey’s  method. 

Table  4.  Diastatic  activity  of  flour  and  starch 
dilutions . 


Protein  content 

Diastatic  activity 

7o 

12.6 

188 

12.0 

178 

11.0 

195 

10.0 

192 

9.0 

168 

These  results,  whilst  subject  to  some  fluctuation,  do 
not  indicate  any  significant  downward  trend  with  in¬ 
creasing  dilution.  This  seemed  rather  surprising,  for  in 
the  starch  dilutions  the  amount  of  diastase  present  would 


\L 


;;  i.,. t  ;;0  ©Oui©  <  J.Slf'J  V0 1X808  SB  \<S  £&nl$±qX&  ©Cf  ^BXfX 

d. •■•/  ..,ooo.  e  o  sIIbIIbyb  xloisJe  Is  tot  Bolts:  civ 

- n  j  ni  ;  i © vs  .trees© ircr  a  a v.r  a *x a  d ;r  ,  7. rax  00  o  t n 
a.  .  9 

••.  ,Lt©cJ  to  ©  .'Jstreo  tmnvr.s  letot  silt  Tev- a  aetata  it 00 It 
aoaBv'a  Tiroll  aluT  . midsize  silt  ^cT  ^xsgBa  otai;  boobsyiioo 
e;l:  ©Xt  7,0  00X00 tts  acf  ct  desoqqixs  ed  oislo  trial  ai 

.  b  '  -  B I '  '  . 

. 

aa,:  ..  •  0;  a  -  aoX  xi  a  sceat  to  vtj;  vlloia  0  xtsdasiX  IT 
10  a,;;.j;:,aDi li-oc, x:  { OS  }  a  VlooilaX  OiolS/J 

.  1  cxi iaoi  a  *x@  sraxTli 

a  O'l  0  ;..  C.:0  7 00 11.  a"  \'t  ‘  V.Ot-  ‘  a  oltHOaB.i-d  *1  8 Id' 00 

,  ooo :  j-  uli.b 


Y t 1  v  X t 0  3  0  It  6  t  B  3  HI  I 

■  —  ~  “  ■  i 

trr-rooo  Btotcv.S 

1 

881 

d  .  11 

8Vi 

0.;i! 

|  3,9.1 

. 

mi  . 

. 

sai 

» 

■-■•.•  too,;0'Cdd  o\a  cl  load,  doa  l  oll. ox  ?s;X:o:;eo  eooioT  . 

. 

.  \  98  .  • 

v.  oo’ooooq;  osatsslo  to  c-.;  boxes  ©fit  snoituXtb  aouxts  silt 


14  - 


presumably  decrease  in  the  same  ratio  as  the  proportion 
of  flour.  The  added  starch  was  shown  to  have  no 
diastatic  activity,  and  was  in  addition  much  more 
resistant  to  diastatic  action  than  the  starch  which 
occurred  in  the  flour.  A  decrease  in  diastatic  activity 
with  dilution  was  therefore  certainly  to  be  expected. 

Gluten  Quality  and  Decrease  in  Loaf  Volume 

per  Unit  Decrease  in  Protein  Content. 

Having  established  a  linear  relationship  between 
protein  content  and  loaf  volume  for  this  particular  flour, 
using  E.  and  A.  technical  wheat  starch  as  a  diluent,  the 
next  step  was  to  apply  the  dilution  procedure  to  a  selected 
series  of  flours.  This  consisted  of  flour  from  three  lots  of 
Marquis  wheat,  grown  at  the  University  of  Alberta  and  having 
an  identical  protein  content  but  showing  varying  degrees  of 
frost  injury,  and  also,  for  comparison,  Quaker  flour  (a 
commercial  patent),  and  flour  milled  from  Marquis  wheat  grown 
in  Southern  Alberta.  All  but  the  commercial  flour  were  milled 
in  the  laboratory.  The  following  is  a  description  of  the  series: 

No.  332.  Marquis  U.  of  A.,  after  fallow.  Injured  by 
frost,  grade  No.  6+ .  Protein  content  of 
wheat  16.3  per  cent,  of  flour  14.5  per  cent. 

No.  333.  Marquis  U.  of  A.,  after  fallow.  Injured  by 
frost,  grade  No.  4-.  Protein  content  of 
wheat  16.3  per  cent,  of  flour  14.4  per  cent. 


iioi^TOcro’iq  9x1^  SB  oxcf:n  omaa  artt  ni  ©aseTCoefc  ^Idafanse'xg 
on  6tb :i  oX  nv/oda  sew  dons# a  6©66b  erfT  .  nx/oll  lo 
©c.o.a:  ifonra  noxXi:66B  ni  saw  6ns  ^XxvxXo.s  oxd’B^aBJtb 
xioinw  iionaXs  add  nanX  noiXoB  oiXBXasJc6  oX  X naXaisex 
oJtXsXasifc  at  e&BSHQeb  A  .atjclt  ©dX  at  bsaauooo 
-.  .  -••  ■. 

eius-^1'  r  c  ecnsno©--*  arts  vd- ^  ;:i9cr;;A0 

*  •  ••' •  ;  •  -  ■  ■  ’  •  ■  i£ xjnio  ni  v •  on. 09-  ■  XinU  ;i  sc 

neawXed  gidanoiXsIerr  naanxl  s  beda-xld'scse  gnivsH 
nsIi/oiXisq:  aid'd-  io*i  ©jebIov  Isol  6ns  XnsXnoo  ale  ■ 

. 

deXoeXea  b  oX  ennnaocng  noiXuI16  arid  ^Iggs  oX  asw  gads  Xxan 
to  aXo!  aenrfX  inonX  auolt  to  6©Xai anao  aidT  ,  anno  Id  lo  Bellas 
gnimu  6ns  BdnadiA  to  x^tatevtaJJ  ©dX  Xa  nwong  ^Xsenw  aJtnp'XfiM 
Xg  a©9^3©6  snivnsv  gniwona  Xncf  X.nexnoo  aJtedo'iq  iBottaebi  ns 

. 

'  '  :  , 

XeXIxci  soon  ci/olt  I  exonerate©  end  Xnd  Iln  ^ndnsdlx  nnedlcoB  ni 

. 

.... 

rtc  x.cbjxiod  nisXont.  .  *6  .oil  ©6b *13  . Xaont 
. ,  .  -.  ,61  X 

t  *  A 

to  deed  •  .  9:  ; '  .  “X-  ,  on  ©Xsnn  ?X&oi:i 

*  - 


-  15  - 


No.  335 .  Marquis  U.  of  A.,  after  fallow.  Injured  by 
frost,  grade  "Feed".'  Protein  content  of 
wheat  16.3  per  cent,  of  flour  14.4  per  cent. 

Quaker.  Used  as  standard  in  baking  laboratory. 
Protein  content  of  flour  13.0  per  cent. 

Southern  Alberta  Marquis .  Protein  content  of 
flour  13.9  per  cent. 

Three  dilutions  of  each  sample  were  made,  using  E.  and  A. 
technical  wheat  starch,  all  percentages  being  calculated  on 
the  dry  basis.  Bakings  were  performed  as  before  with  the 
results  shown  in  Table  5  and  Figure  2. 


Table  5.  Bakings  of  starch  dilutions  of  selected  series 
of  flour  samples. 


Flour 

Protein 

content 

Loaf 

volume 

Flour 

Protein 

content 

Loaf 

vol¬ 

ume 

Flour 

Pro¬ 

tein 

con¬ 

tent 

Loai 

vol¬ 

ume 

7o 

cc . 

% 

cc . 

~ 

cc  . 

No.  332 

14.5 

598 

No.  333 

14.4 

577 

No. 335 

14.1 

597 

13.0 

521 

13.0 

531 

13.0 

553 

11.5 

475 

11.5 

466 

11.5 

494 

10.0 

428 

10.0 

404 

10.0 

413 

Quaker 

13.0 

539 

Southern 

13.9 

479 

Alberta 

12.0 

511 

Marquis 

13.0 

456 

11.0 

470 

11.5 

425 

11.5 

425 

10.0 

405 

Loaf  volume  Ccc) 


15a  - 


Figure  2.  Decrease  in  loaf  volume  with  dilution  of 
selected  series  of  flours . 


16 


Table  6  shows  a  single-figure  estimate1  of  the 
baking  quality  of  the  five  original  flours,  together  with 
dV/dP,  the  slope  of  the  line  in  Figure  2  showing  the  rate 
of  falling-off  in  loaf-volume  with  decrease  in  protein 
content . 

Table  6.  Baking  quality  of  flours,  and  decrease  in 
loaf  volume  per  unit  decrease  in  protein 
content . 


Flour 

Baking 

Quality 

av/dp 

No.  532 

101 

38.0 

No.  533 

98 

39.1 

No.  335 

92 

44.1 

Quaker 

87 

33.0 

S.  Alberta  Marquis 

57 

19.0 

It  will  be  observed  (from  Fig.  2}  that  in  each  case 
the  falling-off  in  loaf  volume  with  dilution  was  directly 
proportional  to  the  decrease  in  protein  content,  or  so 
nearly  so  as  to  make  the  fitting  of  a  straight  line  quite 
justifiable.  In  the  first  three  cases  (the  frost-damaged 
samples) ,  the  decrease  in  loaf  volume  per  unit  decrease  in 
protein  content  was  in  the  inverse  order  of  the  baking 


The  single-figure  estimate  of  baking  quality  was  computed 
as  follows: 

Loaf  volume  -  400  x  0.2 
Texture  score  (possible  10)  x  3 
Crumb  color  score  (10)  x  2 
Gen.  appearance  score  (10)  x  1 
Per  cent  absorption  -  60  x  1 
Total  =  estimate  of  baking  quality 


1  eti$  to  foxx  dri-jodf  t  xcrcX?  lacitgjt •xo  ©rif  to  xtllsup 

onrnio sxobs:  offr  bellini  aj3w  :f  i  rloixiw  soit  fBerfw  axis 

,vf  iBU^idp  .pXli^jBCl  fit  <X0t*X9tlli  dgUOliflB  tnavsw Oil  t8elqiE88 
,  V  3.U-  0  ;C  aXBJtOY-  :BO~  P'.t  CC.VOY'VOO  AOLLOV-Z  39W0US 

exif  to  "XijoXt  taoicoq  ©iij  meilf  noS  ©xlT 

3nlvB.c.  nollim  sbw  fi  xloxdw  moTt  #&er:x  ed&  ( eat 'tea  ©Xoxlw 
17^  vcf  b&woda  .  anl©;p £  of  anj;wo  ij©f£*coi,i©f  ©Jo  ^XJ&efcfx/oJbm/ 


to  se.oo-so  3  no  fcors'rot'rr-g  oaXu  -©Tew  aeslscf  xscifuIiG 
:  •  oifBOi  ttrifia  to  xioxobbI  teoval  vis  .oo'it  elcfslisva  aslgiriaa 
iooioioo 0  gxxl ad  sbw  doijlw  BtXatXa  to.a  auoriBY  tab  ms 

to  uefslenoo  sjuIT  .  aqo^D  .oleio  to  fnexnf  ‘XBqeQ  ©xif  rxx  no 

©~CH  niefeeV*  ^efts  xtwo'ia  f&adw  aiu  piait  mo'xt  XeXIim  TXfoIt 

•  ^levifoeqaen  stXatXA  baa  obsoO  emc*z&  tvriocmlT  , saatx) 
..i'-3af9*x  nxooa  ,  f?  .oba  v  eXots?  ni  nwcxis  sfXifs©'!  erlT 

sto'i  Bd T  ,noxo  ulib  xidxw  8niLrXov~t£©X  ni  ©8B6*xo9fi  las&iX  a 

t  ■"•'  ?  •  vc?  is  a  B6XIW  r’Xe&’XO  3&iJ&XX©©8£  ©iff  Ml  81  OSBerLQSb  to 

sox iX  ed&  $a  .BtXatXi l  mb  ssbtD  errors  t  ssb-iO  irxefssW 
aii..  to  iioXv oolBxii  xxb  ad  fnod,.\  EjUlf  tsxif  frlgr/orff  saw  fi 
_  ■  ■  ■  1  ‘  -  -  -  . .  . 

;  ■  tl  .  BtXjBtXB  8i  .  DU 8  Cad 

e  ole  r£  ©rid’  ,  at  X©  t  Xu  'reft  s  tesju  xxi  faawol  .?.bw  niefcxq  to 

1 1 1  LIB  Cl  &  *1  OIL  O-  M 


asw  e*zc 3  neq  Jhovorm  neq-  *z:un  etit  eo non  boa 
♦  { 33'ixif  'led.fo  eoo  to  0030  erf 3 


loaf  volume  (cc ) 


17a  - 


Figure  3.  Decrease  in  loaf  volume  with  dilution  of 
flour  from  wheat  grown  after  Timothy, 
Western  Rye  Grass,  Brome  Grass  and  Alfalfa. 


18 


Table  7 .  Dilution  bakings  of  flour  from  wheat  grown 
after  Timothy,  Western  Rye  Grass,  Brome 
Grass  and  Alfalfa. 


Flour 

Protein 

Loaf 

dV/dP 

Flour 

Protein 

Loaf 

dV/dP 

content 

vol- 

content 

vol¬ 

ume 

ume 

fo 

cc . 

¥~ 

cc . 

Wheat 

17.7 

498 

Wheat 

17.8 

505 

after 

after 

Timothy 

13.0 

586 

22.7 

W.  Rye 
Grass 

15.0 

582 

25.8 

10.0 

515 

10.0 

519 

Wheat 

17.0 

512 

Wheat 

16.9 

515 

after 

after 

Brome  Grass 

15.0 

401 

26.3 

Alfalfa 

15.0 

404 

28.4 

10.0 

528 

10.0 

519 

Starch  Dilution  and  Diastatic  Activity. 

Although  the  preliminary  experiments  indicated  that 
diastatic  activity  was  unaffected  by  dilution,  it  was 
suspected  that  these  results  were  not  typical.  It 
certainly  seemed  unlikely  in  the  extreme  that  when,  as  in 
some  of  the  mixtures  worked  with,  over  forty  per  cent  of 
the  flour  had  been  replaced  by  starch  which  contained  no 
diastase  at  all  and  in  addition  was  quite  resistant  to 
enzyme  hydrolysis,  the  amount  of  sugar  produced  would  be 
unchanged.  Accordingly,  the  influence  of  dilution  on 
diastatic  activity  was  studied  in  three  additional  cases; 


i  ' 

-  3  t  l  b  1'  X  A  a  a  a  a  a  6  i-D 


CX£  \Vd  1  xbo.J  |  irXe^c* *!5! 
I  -lev  j  w  .uscr.ioo 
i  emu 


, 


* 

goe 
j .  sag 

i  eic: 

1_._ . . 


8X8 

~,3K 

ex? 


6,  v  X 

‘leXtB 

* 

8  a, 3  tD  ]{ 

0.0  X 


0 ,  r  r 


&B0dW 

‘xeJfa 

BtlBtlA 


!  tsoa 

- 

j  emir 

XXX49  0^1 
tne^no© 

•moll 

7 .  :  .7: 

* 

>  3Gi> 

;  86? 

SIg 

. 

. 

, 

$S$£fW 

?etta 

ydtomJtT 

sis 

. 

dsedW 

'iBtta 

,  : 

IOi> 

. 

SBBlQ  9010 

8S8 

0.  or 

— ^ 

jjA  drxJ-  :•  .  A-  -  ,/r  ...  J  „ 

^sZcosLru  r:::;:e-ul;-iBqze  exA  J;ii/cd$lA 

.  . 

:rI  >^olq;s^  Oon  aasv;  ad’Xjjeo’x  soedTt  Jsitt  fee^oeqex/s 
-:  =  ^  ■  ■  -  t  x .;  -  , 

•A“;  " " 5 "  -  ■ ;  '  ■ ;r * •• : ;;  ■  YQ  ?  - -  •"  X e:toow  a 9 V'. :■  h i :  a: i :  to  emo a 
rc°  :iCi  •-■■'"  -  ...,  heCBtqe'i  £a a  %>joZt  odj 

"  e:;  zzv  'loljlbj-B  at  Xus  LU  $&  oestaatb 

3Cf  ,  „  .  BOOXtQXm:  1&%SJ 3  C  .IJtfOittB  OLI&  1 8  ifivl 005^1  ©i^SU© 

c‘"'"  0  '  '  A-.  D8u.;;..ts  9BW  oiOe^aBiX 


-  19 


the  Quaker  and  Southern  Alberta  Marquis  flours  already- 
referred  to,  and  a  third,  designated  "Flour  A",  which 
was  available  at  the  time  in  the  laboratory  and  consisted 
of  a  mixture  of  residues  from  trial  millings,  etc. 

The  diastatic  activity  of  the  original  and  diluted 
flours  was  determined  by  the  method  used  before  (20),  and  in 
each  case  a  definite  downward  trend  with  dilution  was 
established.  In  Table  8  the  actual  decrease  in  diastatic 
activity  on  dilution  is  shown,  together  with  a  "theoretical" 
diastatic  activity  calculated  on  the  assumption  that  the 
diastatic  activity  was  directly  proportional  to  the  amount 
of  flour  (and  hence  of  diastase)  in  the  mixtures.  Although 
the  agreement  is  far  from  perfect,  there  is,  nevertheless, 
some  indication  that  the  diastatic  activity  is  roughly 
proportional  to  the  amount  of  flour  in  the  mixture. 


Table  8.  Starch  dilution  and  diastatic  activity. 


Flour 

Protein  content 

Diastatic 
activity  as 
determined 

Diastatic  activity 
calculated  from 
dilution 

Flour  A 

ah 

12.9 

155 

12.0 

131 

144 

11.0 

121 

132 

10.0 

118 

120 

Quaker 

13.0 

282 

12.0 

198 

260 

11.0 

204 

239 

10.0 

179 

217 

Southern 

13.9 

149 

mm 

Alberta 

11.5 

136 

126 

Marquis 

10.0 

121 

107 

‘mK'  c''-  Cd'.Mvi.,,.  ,'M;:  ■;  bn,-;  Ti-'ia.up  grit 

< 

;,eif3iano°  ba»  ^is.:-o tf*I  ,  ;t  trx  a  -=-f  ©;£,  „a  •«bX1bt»  saw 

’  J”e  t  <•;•••  U  x ,  '  : estaj:  to  exatfaciEi  s  to 

' '  x'io  erij  'tc  i f)js  oi tataalA  sriT 

1  ,:;3  '  :i'!  oo;ju  -a tc-;.?  sat  xcT  Jbsa ..:;:ns^si3  sbt-;  ati/oXl 

J*j' i,v  tow  J&is  aafc*  et J::  I'iso  fl.  ©aso  rfoss 
n-  oooyyooc:  O;.;  Sii  ■  3  eluao  a:  .  jbflrfrsxloati;© 

. 

end  dan  noj;.i  a:;  ; '  t  no  ■,  9}  ;i!/x  too  vJIvWob  oxJ-«Jaj3x6 

'  '  ■  ■  ■  . 

, •a-s:,,y-i..-v-..'£  ,ex  «-«(!}  , sv ootioo  cljI'l  -iat  ei  SiizoiamQB  odd 

■toaoc-  .  ..txvitoB  oid  idsatr.  a  id  bo tt aslant  ©coe 

■ 

■ 


L‘  5  .  . 

S4ii  s:  0 

noiX  '/Xio 


olXea^iG 

B©iii/na:souf3l) 


Cv  J* 

0  SI 


e-Ra 

. 


vox 


aax 

i>i 

xsi 


sea 


^ rx  9  ho  o  ale.&o  TrI 


tooX’E 


, 

(  .  S  X 

. 

, 


A  too  XI 


ou: 

j 

* 

-•uS 

nr,  r. 

J.  XX 

fc-Vi 

ex-x 

■■■• .  . 

Qf{ 

. 

13  X 

A  A  T 

» 

‘ioXb  up 


£VX&jd&JJQ& 
sfi&tfl A 
ail/pXoG 


20 


From  the  foregoing  work  the  following  facts  emerge :- 

1.  When  flour  is  diluted  with  starch,  a  linear  relation 
between  protein  content  and  loaf  volume  is  obtained. 

2.  In  one  case  at  least  (the  three  frost-damaged  samples) 
dV/dP,  the  decrease  in  loaf  volume  per  unit  decrease  in 
protein  content,  seems  to  be  related  to  gluten ty*- . 

It  was  now  thought  that  possibly  the  diastatic  activity 
factor  should  not  be  ignored  after  all,  even  in  method  (1) 

(see  page  3}  .  In  the  case  of  the  Quaker  and  Southern  Alberta 
Marquis  flours,  wide  differences  in  diastatic  activity 
(Table  8),  and  d?/dP  (Table  6)  occurred,  these  differences 
being  in  inverse  directions.  It  seemed  possible  therefore 
that  the  anomalous  behaviour  of  the  Southern  Alberta  Marquis 
might  be  due  to  its  gas  production  being  so  low  as  to  be  the 
limiting  factor  in  loaf  volume,  protein  scarcely  coming  into 
question  at  all. 

In  method  (2)  of  course  there  was  no  doubt  that  differ¬ 
ences  in  diastatic  activity  would  have  to  be  eliminated. 
Sherwood  and  Bailey  (24)  concluded  from  their  own  and 
Rumsey* s  (23)  work  that  a  diastatic  activity  of  about  250  was 
the  optimum  for  bread-making  purposes,  but  for  high  protein 
Canadian  wheat  flours,  forming  doughs  of  greater  extensibility, 
this  would  be  a  somewhat  conservative  estimate.  It  seemed 
fairly  safe  to  assume,  therefore,  that  in  the  majority  (if 
not  all)  of  the  flours  here  dealt  with,  gas  production  was  a 
limiting  factor  in  loaf  volume.  The  gluten  was  not  being 
extended  to  the  full  amount  of  which  it  was  capable,  and  there 


OS 


- .  lame  si  oBt  anxwolXol  ©ifi  2fio»  snxogenot  end'  mote? 

■ 

‘ 

. 

■t:  ^-.saiosfi  ini.  Tsq  e,m£ov  taoX  at  eaaeroeb  ©dfr  f<a\y* 
’ 

&ivt7-  B  oitaiaath  ©da-  vid xeeoc;  iadi  idaoodi  won  a©w  il 
^  ®  «  : 

. 

' 

:S;:  aaS-  J  rOQ-I'UOOO  (0  ©XdfiT;  .  Yb  £,££©  ,{8  i'lo'sT ) 

B*‘  ;  Sidiaeo q  6e,ae©a  tfl  . aaoiJ-osiii)  eaxsvnt  at  sated 

ailip“  ;  ^TOrfI~  n^eriixroc  ©rii  to  *c*,o  traded  aaoXaroia  arii  tad* 
™  c';  aB  ,?o1  08  S^ied  noxioi/ioxg  sag  sti  ot  suf)  ©d  Malm 
'■-■-Ti  ,,.:,;iv;oo  YlsoiBoa  xtieiovy  tasur£or  taoX  ui  rotost  anxti.uil 

*  i-L3  ?  a  £1 0 1  #  3  9  jjp 

~'le'-£D  tBAt  tduob  on  am  e-x&di  ©e-moo  to  (a)  fioittam  nl 

£;tb  inro  -tied*  mont  0 ©Onion©©  (*S)  yoXXaa  boa  boowxeda 
am  ^  iilG<Ss  t0  vnrttoe  otietaatb  ©  tad*  *J(m  (SSj  8  ,,:5>eattffl ' 

U£*irC^  W  101  *U(S  ^oqxuq  nuiiBUi-Sasxd  -col  Eu.ultgo  ad* 
.Xttttdieuatxe  xetmxa  to  adsnoi  sniarao*  ,aw£i  ,B8liw  nslJbfliIa0 

' 

” BU”  «®*o*9t:ed*  .siayaaa  o#  ©Isa  yXxtat 
aay  tlseb  a -red  ara/oXl  sd*  to  (ff«  j0n 

9«d,  ,ei  ^8o  am  tt  o idw  to  fnnom  Hut  ©d*  o*  ioaOu©**© 


21  - 


was  no  reason  to  suppose  that  in  a  series  of  flours  the 
ratio  of  actual  to  maximum  possible  loaf  volume  would  be 
the  same  in  any  two  cases. 

Further  complications  became  apparent  owing  to  the 
fact  that  on  dilution  with  starch,  both  the  diastatic 
activity  of  a  flour  and  the  maximum  loaf  volume  that  it 
could  sustain  would  be  reduced.  There  seemed  to  be  three 
possibilities  with  regard  to  the  relationship  between 
actual  gas  production  (governed  by  diastatic  activity) 
and  the  gas  production  necessary  for  maximum  loaf  volume: 

(a)  both  might  decrease  with  dilution  by  the  same 
relative  amount; 

(b)  the  gas  production  necessary  for  maximum  loaf  volume 
might  decrease  relatively  more  rapidly  than  actual  gas 
production; 

(c)  actual  gas  production  might  decrease  relatively  more 
rapidly  than  the  gas  production  necessary  for  maximum 
volume . 

It  seemed  quite  possible  that  (c)  could  be  the  case  in 
flours  of  high  diastatic  activity,  whilst  (b)  held  in  those 
of  very  low  diastatic  activity.  In  viev/  of  these 
possibilities  and  the  above  mentioned  facts  it  seemed  that 
perhaps  the  best  way  to  obtain  true  comparisons  might  be 
to  adjust  the  diastatic  activity  of  all  flours  and  their 
dilutions,  so  that  the  maximum  possible  loaf  volume  was 
produced  in  every  case. 


X  o 


:  ■'  0ij  ■  v  ■  •;iiaeo,  m;z:i C-J  Is  to  ■  lo  o  -tsv 

•  —  — '  ■■■  ,-;l  i;:sg  e.t:' 

°‘  *•■««•«*  omoed  aaott&otlqaoo  ■xedtv/z 

oi.:eu  e.l;  .tfotf  <io^8  dJiw  ao.  vlJib  no  j *0Bl 

W  SMu£or  ti3oL  wwtxm:  etfj-  fine  n/oXi  s  to  T*i7l*0B 

■ 

■  t**1*™  •"•»«»  Xtf  fieoapvos)  aolioubo*  aaS  Wos 

. .  “J'mix"'£r  ‘■cc:  ‘i*a-3aep@o  ooWoobooq  ass  eiW  £as 

' 

auc,':«  5y.i?5.i3t 

3isa.ioT  tar-i  Mia,  O'  i  uoaeseoon  nottouboiq  ass  sttt  (o') 
838  lBU:f0a  *****  won  Ti*r»»Jto*  ea».,oa* 

tKil0.L$0Sj£0'XC 

YX8V-“BX6'r  ®8ae-0®*  noi*o06o~q  aa3  .Ls^oe  <0> 

*  oaulcv 

■  ■  i*  naiii  to  Biuon 

* 

.  ■  t  , 

80  ^  *“  tttatdo  or  w  w  «»  .qBd«q 

*“  e';:iJ0X'i  ^  10  *«’"*•  .<»  ,«**  o, 

liBW  *««■£  ■  Id  ieaoq  aimilxfiirf  9<*  „ 

. . “’■  ■  “  ■  :-e  ,  a.aoia;;Ii.& 

*aas0  SOT®  ox  beoubo’iq 


22 


Experiments  Involving  the  Stimulation  of  Gas 

Production. 

In  the  attempt  to  eliminate  diastatic  activity  as  a 
complicating  factor,  and  definitely  to  establish,  if  such 
existed,  the  relationship  between  gluten  quality  and 
behaviour  on  starch  dilution,  further  experiments  were  now 
designed.  In  these  experiments  it  was  planned  to  use  flour 
milled  from  wheat  of  four  standard  varieties,  chosen  so  as 
to  form  a  graded  series  in  respect  of  baking  quality.  Wheat 
of  these  four  varieties,  Marquis,  Red  Bobs  No.  222,  Huron 
and  Vermilion,  had  been  grown  in  adjacent  plots  at  Clover 
Bar,  near  Edmonton,  during  the  summer  of  1929.  A  considerable 
quantity  of  each  variety  was  milled,  the  protein  content  of 
the  flour  determined,  and  dilutions  made. 

As  a  first  step  the  original  and  diluted  flours  were 
baked  in  the  ordinary  way  and  also  with  the  addition  of 
0.001  per  cent  of  potassium  br ornate .  This  substance  acts 
as  a  flour  improver,  its  effect  as  a  rule  being  more 
pronounced  the  higher  the  protein  content  of  the  flour. 

The  precise  nature  of  its  action  is  not  yet  known,  -tei 
o ordain  wo rkers^, Working  (27,  28)  and  Geddes  (10),  believe 
that  it  affects  the  physical  condition  of  the  gluten, 
possibly  as  the  result  of  a  dispersing  action  on  certain 
phosphatides  intimately  admixed  with  the  gluten  con¬ 
stituents,  but  it  still  remains  to  be  proved  that  this 
effect  alone  explains  all  the  changes  resulting  from  its 
use.  Table  9  and  Figures  4,  5  and  6  show  the  results 


-  •  ;oj  :  Oi/..:,  eo:l 


' 

ol  ^loj.caxl9fc  ol;,j  ,‘to^OBl;  -ooll-cll :uaoo 
bi-a  ^iXst/p  jisj-I;,  .lowered  nhlzaoltals-x  erf?  ,j>a*si;ce 
w0“  ;3'r5V-  **amtvBq&  saaiiot  \aoLtsslib  Ho-xate  ao  ivotmded 

, 

' 

.  , 

■ 

-■Avolv  ins  ad-01  too.5:,M  ru  nv-  need  bsd  ,notUmieV  baa 

■  1  ; 

■ 

' 

acutx;:-o&  *&.;  nd'xw  oar-  isixs  v-i ■•;, 0  s,;j-  -  j.  be>.3d 
■  ■ 

■;V  'i0  ''■’•■ 3  -  ::  -'s  t-9  Cdi  .KTCIi -xu  \  £  S3 

' 

. 

;  9J-  *°  i:-  ;  '-Z«*o  Isoiavi  sxx  adoeK:S  *t  tad* 

00  -  :Jos  saisvemib  «  to  iXlV.er.  srif  aa  ^Xtfiaaoq 
-,.oo  aedr,,,;  odd-  ridxw  fieximte  vi9},,,,,j  aebbt adqaodq 

Basmxio  ad*  Ils  saisXqita  snole  JoeM© 

"*  T'  ""  3  -lOua  d  *  JCB  §  t  £  a.^^ro.i-'  hr***  r>  r-r .  -••> 


aeo;.;gl;i  j&ise  <?  eldsT 


.  98  If 


23 


thus  obtained. 


Table  9.  Dilution  bakes,  with  and  without  bromate,  of 
flour  from  Marquis,  Red  Bobs  No.  222,  Huron 
and  Vermilion  wheat. 


Variety 

Protein 

Loaf 

dV/dP 

Loaf 

Response 

content 

volume , 

volume , 

to 

standard 

bromate 

bromate 

method 

method 

% 

cc . 

cc . 

cc . 

Marquis 

18.5 

573 

748 

175 

16.0 

516 

573 

57 

14.0 

470 

24.1 

518 

48 

12.0 

421 

462 

41 

10.0 

371 

397 

28 

Red  Bobs  No. 

17.0 

529 

644 

115 

222 

14.0 

450 

24.8 

492 

42 

12.0 

405 

420 

17 

10.0 

370 

400 

30 

Huron 

15.7 

480 

590 

110 

14.0 

417 

30.4 

477 

60 

12.0 

372 

406 

34 

10.0 

312 

358 

56 

Vermilion 

14 .8 

337 

417 

80 

13.0 

302 

16.8 

332 

30 

11.5 

287 

290 

3 

10.0 

267 

269 

2 

.berried’ do 


to  t&$BMoidi  d*0oxliiw  has  .  Jlv/  ta92± sd  noiiuiia  .  Q  9ldBT 
ncmfn  tsas  ,  o?[  adoa  b©£  tsiirpT8M  irio^ri  vuiolt 

.tfaedvr  aotllmieV  bn 3 


23a  - 


Figure  4.  Decrease  in  loaf  volume  with  dilution  of 
flour  from  Marquis,  Red  Bohs  No.  222, 
Huron  and  Vermilion  wheat .  Baked  by 
ordinary  method. 


Figure  5.  Decrease  in  loaf  volume  with  dilution  of 
flour  from  Marquis,  Red  Bobs  No.  222, 
Huron  and  Vermilion  wheat.  Baked  with 
the  addition  of  0.001  per  cent  potassium 
bromate . 


Response  to  inornate  tec) 


23C 


Per  cent  protein 


Figure  6.  Variation  in  response  to  hr  ornate  with 

dilution  of  flour  from  Marquis,  Red  Bobs 
No.  222,  Huron  and  Vermilion  wheat. 


-  24 


With  the  ordinary  baking  procedure,  the  falling-off 
in  loaf -volume  was  again  proportional  to  the  decrease  in 
protein  content,  and  in  the  case  of  three  of  the  varieties, 
namely  Marquis,  Red  Bobs  No.  222  and  Huron,  the  slopes  of 
the  curves  obtained  (Fig.  4),  by  plotting  the  loaf  volume 
against  protein  content  were  in  the  inverse  order  of  baking 
quality,  although  the  difference  in  slope  between  Marquis 
and  Red  Bobs  No.  222  was  but  slight.  Vermilion,  however, 
which  is  known  to  be  very  inferior  in  this  respect, 
although  giving  a  small  loaf  volume  at  first  did  not  fall 
off  to  any  great  extent  on  dilution,  thus  behaving  in  a 
similar  manner  to  the  Southern  Alberta  Marquis  of  a  previous 
experiment . 

It  is  apparent  from  Fig.  5,  that  when  these  bakings 
were  performed  with  the  addition  of  potassium  bromate,  the 
linear  relation  between  protein  content  and  loaf  volume 
disappeared.  The  resulting  curves  do  not  appear  to  be 
related  to  gluten  quality  in  any  simple  manner.  The 
response  to  bromate  (i.e.  the  difference  between  loaf 
volume  with  and  without  bromate),  plotted  in  Fig.  6,  also 
fails  to  reveal  any  helpful  differences  between  the  varieties. 

Since  it  was  felt  that  in  all  probability  these  results 
were  complicated  by  variations  in  diastatic  activity,  an 
effort  was  now  made  to  control  this  factor.  If  some  fairly 
wide  range  existed  over  which,  owing  to  its  no  longer  being 
a  limiting  factor,  such  variations  had  no  appreciable 
effect  on  loaf  volume,  then  it  was  thought  that  the  problem 


~ 

,  .i.  eu-.v:  'root  ©ox  ox  La^olS'xOqpi’-;  n  ibo  ;oo.  xoTaXov-tBOl  ret 


’sixsT  and:  to 

eearitf' 

to  ass 0 

©xit  nx 

1  ib  e  $  0  0 1  no  0  i  r  1'  e  1 0  iq 

860  0X5  9.C-.  X  ii 

lO'XJJH  .5 

ilB  SiiS  , 

- 

X©/.  t  ainpi£.M  ^Xsiiisn 

i-o?  to oX  exit 

■aiillclq  xd  f 

» 

^ecLtBldo  asvizjo  exit 

l,i-l ■  to  is&’xc  ssTevni  odd  rr t  ©o©w  i'.a*:  :/;ioo  ate* o*ro  uani^A 
■  ~  '  ii  . 

r  •  :  - 1  ~  •  •■■  ”  •  ,-v-  ;■  \  ,  .  ,  ,-.  D8H  one 

;"-o  3-t.  j  r.t  va,.v  --tr::  vt.jt  cd*  nwont  ex  iiotxiw 

Xxot  gi'ii  oil  la'll!  j.o  e&irlov  IboI  Home  b  sxu'vlg  xCgi/cdtflB 
b  ni  galrsds a"  sxr-ix  ,  itoixf  oil  1  to  dreed  re  ia©T;  yob  od*  Ito 
cixoi  3  iO  SX.Cjp'IB.rl  SCTTecfxA  XI$eXit SJCO  erfcT  OX  YSOLOBXf  ^BliiUi: 3 


* 

;  o  -  x-:  x  '£■■:■■:  .  -  ■;:  .:  - :  c  „  •  ■;  .?;v-  ■••.;  •  or -or  syow 

ooao.ov  IboI  ooa  xoojxoo  oiodQ'xq  £[8  o '/  j  8  cf  xioU'sde%  aaenix 

'•  •  '  '  ■.  ^  oovooo  ©rii  .  .;,8y,3©g qseXis 

' 

»  . 

‘  °  *  ■  '  ■  ’  i'X.-  JA;  t{@$BMC*IQ  fucoixiw  JC)0£  •Md’XW  BUH/XOT 

9io©jo.£v  orlX  tee  wiser  aeomieVtib  lulqled  xm  leaver  o&  all  at 
"""3i  ^d*!  I  Madera  IXs  xxx  texTl  diet  bbw  lx  ©ooxB 

*  * '  oj.  j  ,,.d  nx  sxioxd'Bi’XJST  B^itBoXjqjsGo  erew 

i)lj~  5un:j‘  Xortnoo  od  eooo.  won  bbw  .  .  •. . 

‘iovo  Jbed-aixe  o^nar  ©J&iw 

;1  BIO0^qs  0X1  *Bri  anoj;XBx-cBv  xfoxra  ^oaTOBt  snx^xxsll  a 

no  Mo  0  o  jo,....;-  tri  •  •  t  >-  -  +  *r 

'  tX  iX9i*v  » u;  ulOV  MoX  XXO  uOOtt© 


-  25  - 


might  he  fairly  readily  solved.  It  should  he  possible,  hy 
means  of  a  relatively  few  experiments,  to  determine  the 
amount  of  some  diastatio  preparation  to  add  to  any  flour 
of  known  diastatic  activity  in  order  to  bring  its  sugar 
production  within  the  desired  range. 

With  this  end  in  view,  varying  amounts  of  each  of 
two  highly  diastatic  preparations,  takadiastase  supplied 
by  the  Parke-Davis  Co.  and  malt  extract  of  200  degrees 
Lintner,  supplied  by  Standard  Brands  Ltd.  were  added  to 
each  of  the  four  experimental  flours  and  the  resulting 
changes  in  diastatic  activity  determined.  (In  the  case 
of  the  malt,  0.05  per  cent  of  mono-ammonium  phosphate, 
NH4H2PO4,  which  acts  as  a  yeast  stimulant,  was  also  added) . 
The  results  are  summarized  in  Table  10  and  Figures  7  and  8. 
With  takadiastase  the  increase  in  sugar  production  in  each 
flour  follows  a  similar  law,  although  the  actual  amount  of 
the  increase  varies  in  each  case,  owing  probably  to 
differences  in  starch  resistance.  The  results  obtained 
by  the  use  of  malt  are  more  irregular.  This  may  be 
accounted  for,  in  part  at  least,  by  the  difficulties  in¬ 
volved  in  manipulating  small  amounts  of  this  substance,  it 
being  of  a  thick  syrupy  nature.  There  is  also  the 
possibility  of  non-homogeneity  of  the  malt,  thorough 
mixing  being  impossible.  In  general,  however,  the  results 
seem  to  be  of  a  somewhat  similar  nature  to  those  obtained 
with  takadiastase. 

It  was  also  planned  to  bake  loaves  containing  the 


same  proportions  of  these  preparations,  in  order  to 


- 

v~  X&s  Ov  51, x  ix.,.  txx-  e<,:  oi  ,■  ,,xxv..  'lo  't.auani& 

at j;-  or  rxi:  xti yxtr ©.&  oitjsctsjg  1,6  x'xu.x:x  lo 

-  xx,.xrx  X;.X  ,.xx  txxH  iici; ionbo'x? 

:  v  ■■'■'■  X'.....  -  ,  XXXXX  X I  U  il&  Bxxt 

acaXxHXa  x.H  < ax;,:.'  H-.xxxxxx  x x  x  H;  x  i:  .D  vlrfotn  ow ,t 

■r: V X  -XXX  x..  XX,  v‘;,i:.X;  :x.x;x.'  XXX:  .  X,  XXXX;:.-»X.VX  xX.  3  i  :X‘  xg 


■  '  1"-"  *■'  •  -  "''--XXX  .,•  "  X  '  X  .  .  ^  ^  -  jj  |;  £ 

Xflx  X;  -X  .  XX;X/X  xrxxx  xx.  ■  X  ,;  j  XO  LOBQ 

* 

xx;.'._  x  '  ; ,/. . .  x  XX.:  x  ’ ,  X;  f  XXX.X  xXj  ‘io 


'  '  ~QXS3  X'XX'  t  txx,.:.  3'o  d'XXXX  X  X  a:;O.X  riC’l  XV/  ,|i.'XXC»XT^:f;.£ 

°  v  x'.„  .oas  ol  eLi&?  ,:l  5ee .rmx.xu/3  3*ib  atflueai  eiiT 


’  j  viuoxEcriB.  ,waX  miEfenj-,  *  ;x  Hot  xx>Xt 

c"’  V,-x  X',xxx'o  ?esao  xx-xx  at  se.rxrw  ©axxxaai:  eriX 

■..x,:do  xxl;;-;ex:  •  ®]V±  ,  x OM x? X x o a  d&rB&B  nl  aeoamet’Ub 

- 

fl  '  ■'  '  x-x  56  .  C 


•  .  •  i  .  .  ; 


ri3L0'1'  -•  «*-'«='•  *©  iJle.-’JSQBiaii-ibc  to  uauXitfieaoq 

:  ■ 

"V,  ,  -  o  aaou*  od  ear: an  »liai8  ^  fwamoa  «  to  at  meea 

,  x X a#  i;  X,0'X'b,x  £fX XW 

®'"  »«**  •>*«*>  aavacl  etfstf  oi  beamlq  oal*  saw  n 

*°  ru  <ar--;fB'~A  easxicf  to  acoWaoqoM  anee 


36 


determine  the  region  of  optimum  diastatic  activity,  as 
judged  by  the  attainment  of  maximum  loaf  volumes.  When 
this  was  attempted,  however,  it  was  found  that  in  addition 
to  being  highly  diastatic,  both  the  takadiastase  and  malt 
evidently  contained  proteolytic  enzymes.  These  adversely 
affected  the  gluten  during  fermentation,  resulting  in 
sticky,  "runny"  doughs  which  could  not  be  handled.  By 
reducing  the  amount  of  water  added  in  mixing  the  dough 
(in  certain  instances  by  as  much  as  12  cc.),  some  loaves 
were  obtained,  and  the  volumes  of  these  have  been 
included  in  Table  10. 


Table  10.  Results  of  adding  takadiastase  and  malt 
extract  to  experimental  flours. 


Flour 

Amount  of 
prepara¬ 
tion 
added 

Taka- diastase 

Malt  extract  +  0.0^ 

ammonium  phosphate 

Diastatic 

activity 

Loaf 

vol¬ 

ume 

Diastatic 

activity 

Loaf 

volume 

~v 

cc . 

cc. 

Marquis 

— 

140 

554 

140 

554 

0.05 

273 

745 

187 

642 

0.10 

318 

— 

199 

661 

0.15 

350 

340 

305 

687 

Red  Bobs  No.  222 

— 

184 

541 

184 

541 

0.05 

358 

660 

283 

570 

0.10 

431 

-  — 

322 

618 

0.15 

455 

— 

385 

650 

Huron 

— 

131 

498 

131 

498 

0.05 

268 

638 

165 

544 

0.10 

301 

— 

221 

584 

0.15 

332 

616 

279 

582 

Vermilion 

— 

95 

450 

95 

450 

0  ,05 

154 

538 

149 

512 

0.10 

172 

520 

166 

522 

0.15 

208 

456 

190 

520 

-■  ?  ;.r . o.;,v  ;::o  :.oi£  oro  to  oa;t  -  •:  ^‘rod'ojb 

. 

a:..-  Uxbd3  ill  $&d#  hauoi  saw  d-J:  ttceirevroxi  .  :ae,j'mnsd*v8  asw  aixid' 
j  ,  :...;  e  ..■  -  /  a.  /■ £  > :  -.o  x  -..A  .;i,o;A  ,  o'.  :r3:\av;T  ^lai ?ia  gnxscf  otf 

, 

ni  tnoxl8^Ham*xel  ,;.xuo:ito  na  Juris  eriJ  J&etoella 

. .  -  Jon  .  •  .  -  ■  t 

rig  noli  exiJ  gnixixi  hi  fields  to  Jm/oixrs  exit  ;%atoubei 

■  - 

neocf  8¥Bd  eaexlJ  “to  ae  .  :xcv  ao.r  Jbxxs  <£en£fiJu6  ©*xew 

»Ui  •.  .  .:  •  debit  1  cm): 

.  .  *01 

.  a-ijJO.Ii;  90  Aotcuot  ct  >:-s  co 


^O.CTIj  X9 

i  GIL  a  uni  XT ? OHi£ttS 


l.iOj  | 

,  rlOV 


OuL 


aiirrxasluTS 

/JiTlJOB  ;  “lOV 

I  emss 


3€,(.yjz::sih~&  • 

YJItxJob 


i'K>< J> 

S46 

V66 


.>u-6 


041 

V81 

eex 

aos 

£81 

?8S 

3SF 

28f 


> 

&ae 

c4V 

Q4F 

14  C 
066 


to  -tm/oiuA 
**s  xxqe-’icr 
aoxf 
jo  ebb  a  i 


041 

EVS 

sxf 

Q8F 

481 

86-F 

IF4 

554 


604  ! 

IFI 

!  ee4 ! 

xfx 

44a 

aoi 

ea  a 

48c  ! 

roo 
a.  a  2» 

i  —  i 

IGF 

see  J 

ova 

|  »! 

St’F 

ee 

OS*  j 

ae 

sic 

041 

spa 

4c  I 

aae  i 

66X 

oss ! 

3VI 

OOX 

as*  | 

80S 

TBOXl 


If 


ao.o 

01*  C 

ax* 


OA  - 

xu<: 

, 


so*  o 

31.  3 
ax ,  o 


a ' .  o 
■  x . 

. 


SIlipXSM 


* 


no  sun 


ix  t  >3  Lime  Y 


-  26a 


Figure  7.  Effect  of  addition  of  varying  amounts  of 
takadiastase  on  the  diastatic  activity  of 
the  four  experimental  flours. 


D /astatic  activity 


26b  - 


Figure  8.  Effect  of  addition  of  varying  amounts  of 
malt  extract  (200  deg.  Lintner)  on  the 
diastatic  activity  of  the  four  experimental 
flours . 


27 


It  was  realized,  however,  that  owing  to  their  proteo¬ 
lytic  action,  as  a  result  of  which  the  physical  condition 
of  the  gluten  was  affected,  these  preparations  were  un¬ 
suitable  for  use  in  the  present  studies,  and  so  some 
other  method  of  augmenting  sugar  production  was  sought. 

The  addition  of  starch  which  had  been  finely  ground,  and 
was  hence  very  susceptible  to  enzyme  hydrolysis,  in 
constant  amount  in  each  dilution,  although  this  would 
make  impossible  comparison  with  the  loaf  volume  of  the 
original  flour,  seemed  to  be  a  possible  line  of  attack. 

A  portion  of  wheat  starch  was  therefore  ground  for  forty 
hours  in  a  ball  mill,  mixed  with  some  of  the  Marquis 
flour,  and  the  mixtures  baked.  The  results  given  in 
Table  11  show  that  the  increase  obtained  by  the  use  of 
the  finely-ground  starch  alone  is  obviously  not  of  the 
required  order. 


Table  11.  Use  of  wheat  starch  of  low  resistance  in  the 
endeavour  to  stimulate  gas  production. 


Mixture 

Loaf  volume 

cc . 

1.  Marquis  diluted  to  16.0%  protein  with 

516 

unground  wheat  starch 

2.  Marquis  diluted  to  16.0%  protein  with 

548 

finely  ground  wheat  starch 

3.  As  in  (1)  but  with  addition  of  0.05% 

650 

Taka-diastase 

4.  As  in  (2)  but  with  addition  of  0.05% 

670 

Taka-diastase 

Acc’iq  no-  ot  iitwo  ;f  j :t :t  ^icr/eyoii  ti,e^xXs9i  am  c fl 

oi 

■•■  -  5  a- :  .'  -  a  ::i3  n.i  cm-  «  ca  c;.c,  ;;.bw  lev  .0X3  ©iiX  lo 

ic  -o  --  -.  x  i  ■:  ■■  .  me  nc  it  3.-:.::  103:  iUdsXxua 

* 

-A-A  t a. j\:v; ■■••;■  'A---'-  •“>.  1C1O  I'O.  ntl'A  Xm  /3  3l  AC  t  j  t D.0B  8llT 

AC  .CC^lOAAVil  03.1110  cl:  mi.:  -;0CcCC3  C‘I£T  30 iXQd  ESV7 

“  7  Xqi/cca  ,1,3  ?cioi3ia.io  con  it  Ciyccji  insane© 

eii/iov  "Ibox  cc  ;  i-J't;  1  c‘eAi.o  aXoi  acquit  cc- 

*  . 

t  b£wcn%  <  ,  -  ■  ■  .  to  no  J  .  q 

lJ3l;.  8u.j  Av1  &uOc  ill'll  ^  „;.J„  XIC  j  £;i-l;  B  ili  •'-C'XIJOil 

liliJC&i:  .  ”  1  Old*  Oils  t  r  •;  XI 

c  soli  c.i3  vo  leiciBd'oc  ©aBsoioni  eic  tBd&  voas  IX  bicIbT 

"'  '  '  "  ■*  •‘•A-C  ■  VO  0  CC  OlCll  iOA-ll  ,C:  •;>¥  teif tl 

’■  '  '  I  ■;  ,■  „  ,  rr  sxo0t 

9  --  '  M  A ;  '■ 7  &  A:  C  -  i  C  x r  ;j  1  O C  *;s;  > 0 'll  t ;  0 a  $ 


JJ.OV  ^LSOX 


i  - 


■■  •  v: 

j  iftixs-j's  tfseuw  hauox&au 


•  4 


:  1 7 ''A;  7  ••  -  -  -  " :  ■  •'  •'  1  0  •  ■  c:c  v  X@£i  Jr  'r 

* 

Clot  -  "11-10  it 


. 


, 

c  ■ • 0 ....  ■ i  .0  -  3  i,g;3 


28 


These  attempts  to  increase  the  production  of  sugar  in 
the  dough  by  natural  means  (i.e.  enzyme  hydrolysis)  having 
proved  impracticable,  it  was  thought  that  possibly  the 
desired  result  might  be  achieved  by  the  addition,  not  of 
diastatic  preparations  or  readily  hydrolysed  starch,  but 
of  the  product  which  was  actually  used  by  the  yeast, 
namely  maltose.  It  is  true  that  this  might  appear  to 
entail  a  departure  from  the  conditions  usually  occurring 
in  fermenting  dough,  in  which  the  amount  of  maltose 
produced  by  starch-splitting  is  negligible  at  the 
commencement  of  the  fermentation  period,  but  has  become 
fairly  large  in  the  later  stages,  when  it  is  most  needed. 
Inasmuch,  however,  as  a  considerable  quantity  of  sucrose 
(2.5  per  cent),  which  must  be  in  excess  of  the  early  needs 
of  the  yeast,  is  added  in  the  ordinary  baking  procedure, 
it  was  thought  that  probably  the  added  maltose  would  not 
lead  to  over- stimulation  of  the  yeast  in  the  early  stages 
but  would  instead  ensure  the  presence  of  an  adequate  supply 
of  sugar  during  the  important  final  period  of  fermentation. 

A  few  preliminary  experiments  demonstrated  that 
considerable  increases  in  loaf  volume  could  be  obtained 
with  maltose,  added  in  solution  to  aid  in  thorough 
mixing.  In  addition,  the  texture  of  the  loaves  thus 
obtained  was  superior  to  that  of  the  original  flour,  whereas 
those  resulting  from  the  use  of  Taka-diastase  or  malt  were 
impaired  in  texture.  Maltose  and  0.05  per  cent  ammonium 
phosphate,  it  was  found,  gave  better  results  than  maltose 
alone.  Thus  Marquis  flour  baked  with  the  addition  of 


-  83 


xix  ‘iBQua  to  ncxd’ox/JbO'iq  ©rid-  esse* idSfet  ot  atqnatts  eaaciT 
.  3.9,  IB  ©I 

a il z  ‘/X-liaaoc  tsxt  ttgxfoat  saw  tx  < sldaoJ: toa^rqicr  j:  l>9Vo«xq 
to  ten  ?nox txoiDB  exit  Ya"  ssvsirios  ed  tngtiii  tlx/a©i  f)9ilaeJ& 
tud  ,xlo'xsta  £93Ylox!#£.d  yXx£bs*x  *io  anoxts"zsq9iq  ottstastL 
?  tasev  exit  Y&r  fsean  YXXsnt os  esv/  totifw  tontoic  sat  to 
ot  tasqqs  trigtni  atilt  tsxit  exnt  at  tt  .  esotXsjn  YXsnian 
;:  j  X'i£ijjooo  YtlBsau  art  Ltitrcoa  ©rft  ao-rx  eiufrcQqeb  b  Xistne 


ssottam  to  tm/cina  exit  AoXxIw  at  .tai/ot)  anitnexiriet  nx 
sixer  ts  e Xtit 3-1; la e a  •: i:  enxttXtt-t ontts  y^  tsoi/So'iq 
©moose  asn  tool  ^tot'xsc  noxSst.xcti'xel  tit  to  tn9meo£ceOTOo 

. 

9CGX3US  to  itnairp  elcfsm&tanoo  s  sb  tnev9woii  ^doimeoal 

: 

,8‘ijsoooaq  anitsd  o  xsnxoao  exit  ft  setts  sx  4tasoY  sdt  to 
ton.  tli/ow  ©sot Isii  tests  exit  YXcisdoxcq  tsxit  txlguoxlt  ssw  ti 

-  t 

‘  Xq  etsupets  xi jb  to  eoneas'tq  exit  ©xuana  tsetarxi  tix/ow  tx/cf 


.  x:  itst ,-.■  toieS  to  toxisq  Isntt  tnstioquxx  exit  axiiaort  issua  to 
tsilt  Sets it anomst  atfianix^sqxs  Y^niiiiileaq  wet  A 
tsxiistcfo  ecf  ttuoo  emuloY  tso I  fix  aeasexonl:  e  Id  a  mb  x  shod 
xi i Oj.i.t  nx  bis  ot  xiottsXoa  ni  tests  1 9aotXjsnx  xft Jew 

. 

*  t/olt  Xanxgxio.  ©At  to  tsxlt  ot  *xo xneque  saw  bantstd© 
S~''  r'ia::  T0  ®e3d-2siS-B3£BT  -to  930  9ifj  iaoit  gniilL-aei  eecuM- 

, 

lo  £ioxJxi)iB  9dj  dj-iw  593iBcf  10OI-1  ai0|>isM  80I@  .snola 


29 


2.0  per  cent  maltose  gave  a  loaf  volume  of  642  oc . ,  whereas 
with  2.0  per  cent  maltose  and  0.05  per  cent  ammonium 
phosphate,  a  volume  of  668  cc .  was  obtained. 

It  was  decided,  therefore,  to  investigate  the  effect 
of  adding  varying  proportions  of  maltose  to  flour,  in  order 
to  determine  whether,  with  increasing  concentration,  the 
loaf  volume  rose  to  a  sharp  maximum  and  then  fell  off 
again,  or  whether  any  considerable  region  of  Optimum  con¬ 
centration"  existed.  A  number  of  bakings  of  the  four 
experimental  flours  (Marquis,  Red  Bobs  No.  22,  Huron  and 
Vermilion)  were  made  with  the  addition  of  varying  amounts 
of  this  sugar  and  0.05  per  cent  of  ammonium  phosphate,  the 
results  being  included  with  those  of  subsequent  work  in 
Table  12  and  Figs.  9,  10,  11  and  12.  In  each  case  a 
maximum  loaf  volume  was  obtained,  but  whilst  with  Red 
Bobs  No.  222  no  significant  change  in  volume  occurred 
over  a  range  of  concentration  extending  from  four  to 
six  per  cent,  the  volumes  given  by  the  other  three  flours 
increased  to  well  defined  maxima  and  then  fell  off  again 
with  varying  degrees  of  abruptness. 

As  no  gen era!” optimum  zone”  of  maltose  concentration 
had  been  established  for  the  undiluted  flours,  the 
foregoing  procedure  of  baking  with  the  addition  of 
varying  amounts  of  maltose  was  applied  to  the  various 
starch  dilutions.  The  loaf  volumes  obtained  are  shown 
in  Table  12  and  the  accompanying  Figures  9,  10,  11  and  12. 


:  .  0, 


*1 

it oa'll s?  c.i.;  -c  ;  .  ;;M  v  ' ;  .• t  ,  esc  ‘v  •  m-  ;;  eaw  ;r I 

s&otc  a.:  .nx'e  ;1  o.t  ©sc^I^i  tc  arxoi $ z  m; osc  j-\sbv  3/1  i&  Job  lo 
9a,.:  f  iioXassa  aeonoo  31a  a  36  sea:  i:  uXiw  t  v.eaJerlw  esircsscfsi)  07 
llo  XXe’i  naxft:  6xxb  XiiuGaxxBiu  :*  saris  a  od*  sacs  ©mulov  XboX 
-■  .  .  -  ■ 

- 

a-i xii/0£:e  anX-,,s*v  ‘10  noXXx.6£>3  ex:v  aXXv  e;,au  essw  (noJcIJtf  ssV 

■ 

■  ...  .,  ...  .  . 

■ 

■ 

■  '  • 

Om  scrol  most  3x1X1)  xx©;!' xe  iio XjXbs#' xieoxxo 0  ., 

.  . 

a.:.-,  no  XX©  1  nsxljf  £xx©  srnixm.  benltsh  XI©w  cX  heasa^oal 

•  -  ••  ;  ■'  ■ :  ••  \  a;  a: .  ..-a/'  ;  $  jv 

.  ,  , 

lCj.o  as-;  j£9p:rjo  930^ Xanx  So  n©nos  mml^qonlsT3ne^^  on  aA 

e..  ,  oTucl'i  .b&ttr£±£,ju  edit  ■  ol  5  aria  i  Ids  it  a  9  need  feed. 

Co  aoittfcfis  odd  .M,,/  ad-tatsd  to  e^-fieooiq  gaioS9io  1 
ei/ox-av  add  o«  ieiXqgs  aaw  eaodXam  lo  ednuoniB  ^alv.-xav 
-  la  ne  fiextiaddo  aetoiov  isc . 

.  ,.i  X.  »0X  te  een/j.i’5:  aaiifnagffloooa'add  6ns  SX  sXd'sT  ni 


30 


Table  12.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the  addition  of 

varying  amounts  of  maltose  +  0.05  per  cent 
ammonium  phosphate . 


Flour 

Protein 

content 

Maltose 

added 

Loaf 

vol¬ 

ume 

Flour 

Protein 

content 

Maltose 

added 

Loaf 

vol¬ 

ume 

% 

i  ■ 

cc . 

$ 

c  c . 

Marquis 

18.5 

0 

573 

Red  Bobs 

17.0 

0 

529 

2 

627 

No.  222 

3 

571 

3 

648 

4 

620 

4 

663 

5 

623 

5 

639 

6 

616 

Marquis 

16.0 

0 

516 

Red  Bobs 

14.0 

0 

450 

4 

604 

No.  222 

4 

517 

5 

600 

5 

565 

6 

628 

6 

567 

7 

614 

7 

565 

Marquis 

14.0 

0 

470 

Red  Bobs 

12.0 

0 

403 

4 

578 

No.  222 

3 

480 

5 

615 

4 

494 

6 

577 

5 

508 

6 

507 

7 

490 

Marquis 

12.0 

0 

421 

Red  Bobs 

10.0 

0 

370 

4 

455 

No.  222 

5 

404 

5 

546 

6 

460 

6 

480 

7 

453 

7 

452 

8 

390 

Marquis 

10.0 

0 

371 

3 

370 

4 

384 

5 

370 

6 

423 

7 

400 

8 

402 

Huron 

15.7 

0 

480 

Vermil¬ 

14.8 

0 

5537 

3 

553 

ion 

2 

489 

4 

577 

3 

534 

5 

582 

4 

510 

6 

554 

.  ric  ed$  vd  bottladtio  ^osmjL^r  'Zjc.I 

■ 

.  ed  BilCTSCrlq  i.3Jj  .til QSiuiiB 


SI  elcfaT 


Table  12  (cont’d.) 


Flour 

Protein 

content 

Maltose 

added 

Loaf 

vol¬ 

ume 

Flour 

Protein 

content 

Maltose 

added 

Loaf 

vol¬ 

ume 

% 

% 

cc . 

% 

7o 

cc . 

Huron 

14.0 

0 

417 

Vermilion 

13.0 

0 

302 

4 

520 

3 

472 

5 

518 

4 

472 

6 

536 

5 

468 

7 

551 

6 

471 

8 

552 

Huron 

12.0 

0 

372 

Vermilion 

11.5 

0 

287 

4 

479 

4 

451 

5 

470 

5 

462 

6 

497 

6 

460 

7 

477 

7 

466 

8 

452 

Huron 

10.0 

0 

312 

Vermilion 

10.0 

0 

267 

4 

397 

3 

420 

5 

450 

4 

423 

6 

435 

5 

430 

7 

435 

6 

452 

7 

438 

The  curves  obtained  by  plotting  loaf  volume  against 
concentration  of  added  maltose  are  of  some  interest.  In 
general  there  is  an  increase,  with  dilution,  in  the  amount 
of  added  sugar  necessary  to  produce  maximum  loaf  volume. 
There  are  also  marked  differences  in  the  types  of  the  curves 
themselves.  In  the  case  of  the  Marquis,  for  example,  the 
loaf  volume  of  the  three  highest  dilutions  (lowest  protein 
contents)  rises  sharply  to  a  maximum,  and  then  falls  off 
again;  with  the  original  flour  and  the  first  dilution, 
however,  there  is  no  such  peak. 


X. 


( .  b  f&iWD  )  SI  ©IcfaT 


tscd 

©ao'XXB.,.1 

uie^oTi.  j 

ai/cxu  ! 

taoJj 

;8  3oXl.Bl£ 

ruetfoi^ 

'iuol‘5 

-  £ov 

&sMb 

-lev] 

a  ©bos 

j nainoo  ! 

9J3ILf 

BESS 

,  -.  • 

,00 

SOP 

0 

0*  Pi 

noilximeY  s 

0 

o.^x 

hotjltH 

p 

osa 

£ 

sv& 

& 

8  IS 

a 

sa^ 

a 

1 

ape 

a 

xv£ ! 

a 

! 

xee 

V 

; 

S55 

8 

V6S 

k“"  H 
0 

3.  XX 

noillmel  j 

SVP 

0 

0,SI 

iiotuH 

-  Ig£ 

* 

£ 

Sd£ 

a 

0?& 

a 

- 

a 

a 

: 

aa^ 

V 

V 

sg£ 

8 

vas 

i  ° 

' 

0,01 

££OXlXSI<X©Y  ! 

SIP 

0 

o*ox 

floiuH 

QS£ 

5 

1 

V-.B 

& 

PS£ 

& 

cg£ 

a 

0P£ 

a 

ep* 

a 

Sd^ 

a 

ap£ 

V 

8  P£ 

V 

1 

j-iriiBgjs  ©xnulov  tso I  gni ^uoiq  \6  boai&t6 c  aevii/o  sxlT 

.  tfas'ied’ni:  ©xnca  lo  ous  bebbB  to  xctt.B'tfxBoa.QO 

tnmsiB  Hi  * noid’uXii'  rUMv;  ^eageioai:  lb  si  eierid*  I scenes 
.  ©rrri/Xov  Isol  ..luntixBia'  eouocriq  o«  ^TBsaeoan  ‘xagjja  bebbB  to 
aaviuo  eut  ‘io  aeqxtf  edt  Hi  aeoxx-s'iel* IIb  £>exifD3ai  cala  e^us  stsiIT 
orlX  telqaiBxe  *ic  , 

aia^oiq  j*89WoX )  aaoltuLib  taeLbgM  edf  to  smlov  tsol 

tto  2 1  la  x  neacf  ba&  ,  launiixHii  a  ou  vjLcpxBjis  s  ©  a  i  t  (sd'ixaitnoo 

.  : 

*  '.e..ic  .  ••  ■  oxi  >: :  e-seX ,  \:evswod 


Lou/  volume  (cc) 


3la  - 


figure  9.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the  addition  of 
varying  amounts  of  maltose  +  0#05  per 
cent  ammonium  phosphate  to  the  original 
and  diluted  flour  -  Marquis. 


-  3lb  - 


Figure  10.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the  addition  of 
varying  amounts  of  maltose  +  0.05  per 
cent  ammonium  phosphate  to  the  original 
and  diluted  flour  -  Red  Bobs  No.  222. 


Loaf  volume  (cc) 


-  3lc  - 


Figure  11.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the  addition 
of  varying  amounts  of  maltose  +  0*05 
per  cent  ammonium  phosphate  to-  the 
original  and  diluted  flour  -  Huron. 


-  sia  - 


Figure  12.  Loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the  addition 
of  varying  amounts  of  maltose  +  0.05 
per  cent  ammonium  phosphate  to-  the 
original  and  diluted  flour  -  Vermilion. 


Loaf  vo/ume  ( cc ) 


-  3le  - 


Per  cent  protein 


Figure  13 .  Maximum  loaf  volumes  obtained  by  the 
addition  of  maltose  +  0.05  per  cent 
ammonium  phosphate  to  the  original 
and  diluted  experimental  flours, 
plotted  against  protein  content. 


' 


-  32  - 


This  ’’peak"  in  the  loaf- volume  curve  occurs  to  a 
varying  degree  in  the  higher  dilutions  of  all  the  varieties. 
The  fact  that  a  similar  type  of  curve  was  obtained  with  the 
undiluted  Vermilion  flour  suggests  that  it  is  possibly  an 
indication  of  ’’weakness”,  although  the  other  curves 
furnish  several  exceptions  to  such  a  generalisation. 

The  maximum  loaf  volumes  of  the  various  flours  and 
their  dilutions  obtained  with  the  addition  of  maltose  and 
ammonium  phosphate  have  been  plotted  against  protein  content 
in  Fig.  13.  Whilst  gas  production  as  a  limiting  factor 
has  now  undoubtedly  been  eliminated,  the  resulting  curves 
do  not  appear  to  lend  themselves  to  any  simple  quantitative 
estimation  of  gluten  quality.  As  a  matter  of  fact  three 
different  types  of  curves  are  obtained  from  the  four 
varieties.  The  Marquis  curve  is  concave  downward,  Red 
Bobs  No.  222  and  Huron  give  practically  straight  lines, 
and  Vermilion  a  curve  concave  upward.  The  Marquis  curve 
may  perhaps  be  explained  on  the  assumption  that,  owing 
to  the  good  quality  of  the  gluten,  considerable 
quantities  of  starch  can  be  added  to  the  flour  without 
causing  any  great  decrease  in  loaf  volume,  but  that  when 
a  certain  critical  decrease  in  protein  content  has  been 
effected,  the  cumulative  effect  of  the  added  starch  results 
in  a  sudden  large  diminution.  Similarly  the  relatively 
large  initial  decrease  with  dilution  in  the  loaf  volume  of 
Vermilion  may  be  taken  as  evidence  of  inferior  gluten  quality. 
The  subsequent  "flattening-out"  of  this  curve  is  not, 
however,  so  easy  to  explain. 


3  GO  3rX.G0©  C  3  VIGO  OGGI- -OY-GoOX  811  ^  -VvOU  ’ 

> 

9£f-t  dOVW  i>Sg£li  B:tCfO  3BW  QY'WO  lo  ©  .  \?  j  OGli-iXa  B  $  BO  J  1  CBl  ©dT 

.;  ; ,  i.  ,  '.•i-l.:-  V  i;"  lo  .  i  '  ^  oli-rot 

,  z.  S 

into  eiuoXt  sjjox’xbv  add*  lo  aeaa/Iov  IboI  mwinlxBffl  edT 
,;,gg  -liii:  ic  nolcf-1;:  .. I  e,.v  dd  io  *efiisddo  .v:oi:;uIib  liedX 
jrvi^vo  niad  c*tc  uaniBBB  xe^lo^cr  rcesd  ev,  ,  ad'sriqsodq  niuiaoixis 

. 

savn/o  &ai&  £l'B9%  end  .  ;©d\ouixaxi:le  osed  Yl.59^ouojbnu  won  asd 
.//  :;^r iinjBBp  elqxaia  vhb  od*  asvleajsedo  nel  od*  laaqqB  Ion  on 

:  ..  . 

v..  i  o-i  :  i  t  oi  d  •  a-.-.?  ssgogo  ic  aoc  vd  fite'ietltb 

l 

.  ...  . 

3ni.r0  1 1  sdl  noxdoi:u/8BB  odd  no  jssnialoxa  ad  acBdiaq  fBui 
aXdjBi9Dianoo  <ned*j uLg  arid*  lo  bo 03  add  od 

di/on/v 7  -iiroll  sxiX  od  bebbs  ©d  hbo  doi  la  lo  eelXilxisi/p 
-  '  ■••  *  •  J  &&"-•  t©Xi'ijiov  V. 30l  nx  33B©-ioei  I.goog;  VIO.B  rnianso 

-  ■.  Hi  ;  :  1  .  •;  •  :  .:  ;  v:  .•;  .  /  •.,■/-  c  s 

. 

£  m 

1~'‘‘  iboX  add  ni  xioXluXid  ddiv;  98b©*xo8.5  XeiXini  8£}1bX 
iub.3  icxielni  lo  eonebxve  a &  netf&f  sd  vbsu  no  bllmel 
tdcn  ax  ©vino  sirtj  lo  "dno-^ninedd-Bll”  d-nenpaadjja  edT 

*  ’  ::-X  c.  ;Boe  03  viovewod 


32a  - 


Figure  14.  Loaf  volume  obtained  by  the  br ornate 
method,  minus  maximum  loaf  volume 
obtained  by  the  addition  of  maltose 
and  ammonium  phosphate,  plotted 
against  protein  content. 


The  differences  between  the  loaf  volume  obtained  by 
the  bromate  method  (Table  9)  and  the  maximum  obtained  by 
the  addition  of  maltose  and  ammonium  phosphate  (Table  12) 
are  plotted  for  the  various  flours  and  their  dilutions  in 
Figure  14.  There  seems  to  be  no  systematic  difference  in 
the  curves  given  by  the  different  varieties.  It  is 
worthy  of  note,  however,  that  in  the  case  of  the  four 
undiluted  flours,  Marquis,  Red  Bobs  No.  222  and  Huron 
gave  a  greater,  and  Vermilion  a  lesser,  loaf  volume  by 
the  bromate  method  than  with  the  addition  of  maltose. 

The  magnitude  of  the  differences,  it  will  be  noted,  is 
precisely  in  the  order  of  baking  quality  of  the 
original  flours.  The  ability  to  give  a  greater  loaf 
volume  with  bromate  than  can  be  obtained  by  the  addition 
of  maltose  and  ammonium  phosphate  would  therefore  appear 
to  be  correlated  with  baking  quality.  Some  confirmation 
of  this  hypothesis  was  obtained  by  baking  a  sample  of 
pastry  flour,  known  to  be  of  inferior  bread-making 
quality,  by  the  ordinary  method,  with  the  addition  of 
bromate,  and  with  the  addition  of  maltose.  By  the 
ordinary  method  a  volume  of  430  cc .  was  obtained.  This 
was  only  increased  to  440  cc .  by  the  addition  of  0.001 
per  cent  potassium  bromate,  but  with  5  per  cent  maltose 
a  loaf  of  502  cc .  resulted. 

From  the  nature  of  the  curves  in  Figure  14,  however, 
it  appears  that  this  relation  does  not  necessarily  hold 
when  a  number  of  flours  are  brought  to  some  similar 
protein  content  by  the  addition  of  starch. 


vu  oa-iiBldo  mi/lov  l&ol  exil  iioewlftf  aoor^iBliih  sdT 
.'  6  .';:X.-  /  VC  a  xrj-/,  .edit  iioo  f©  s.rcfBT }  ioalen  elfij-oicf  eril 

' 8ldiiT‘  Sl^ldSOIiq  Incudd  ,  C£IB  & 30 tXBKt  ‘10  iloilibo.O  8£ll 

ixi  anoit sjlib  '.ilent  £hb  eraoll  avci'cav  ©xTi  lot  betto Xq  sib 

. 

. 

~tfsl  9il3  10  3  03  0  arid*  ,a.?:  lain  ^evewoil  t@jon  lo  xtiX^Qw 
-  ; 

yc  eniaco  120  £  t  -xosssX  o  ^o.rXiroioT  loo  ^alosii;  b  evo:^ 

- 

cd  Ilxw  01  ?  SSOiXO  OSl'llO  6x1 1  lo  Bbift irXQBXl'  OiiT 

9rfow  1c  7 :tiX;.,op  axxioBCf  lo  debio  ad.-  rtl  ^Xe 3 iodic- 

...... 

'  ■  •  •  :  ,  / 
iBeeciB  ©‘ic/is-isrfl  Xlirow  elBnqgorlq  uifjinoixmB  bm  e eotlom  lo 

* 

^ciielrxi.  lo  ©cf  ol  oworol  ^xocoi  y'iIsbq 

-  tw  ,  -  . 

.aaollBG  lo  ••  o ill  13.5b  axil  rfcflw  £n8  .elaoiOTcr 
• 

'*  10  '«*****»•  «»  *<f  .00  OM.  oa  Jbsesa-rorxi  xlao  sew 

. v!  80  •  •’«  3  ^  ,9-taffioid  mtBaatoq  Sue o  isq 

.wstfliraei  .00  SOc  So  Ssol  s 
.  •*■'•  .e-xujjXa  xii  aeviuo  grid-  So  siui-jsxt  grid  mo if 

iXC“  ^W800a“  *orx  89C*  aid*.  dsrfd  8^9qqe  t± 

%Sl  !tS  e“Ce  °*  Wawo-Id  S'XB  a-i/oxt.so  <x9tffftua  B  xieriw 
■  rlo^Ja  to  netmbB  arid  Ytf  &ae&aoo 


DISCUSSION  OF  RESULTS,  AND  CONCLUSIONS. 

In  the  preliminary  discussion,  attention  was  directed 
to  the  fundamental  difference  between  the  method  here 
employed  and  that  used  by  some  British  millers  as  an 
index  of  flour  strength.  In  the  latter,  the  greater 
the  difference  between  the  strong  Canadian  flour  and 
the  weak  flour  with  which  it  is  being  mixed,  the  greater 
is  the  improvement  effected.  In  the  former,  on  the  other 
hand,  it  was  assumed  that  the  greater  the  difference  in 
properties  between  the  flour  to  be  tested  and  the  starch 
added  to  it,  the  smaller  would  be  the  resulting 
impairment. 

Emphasizing  this  fundamental  difference,  two 
opposing  tendencies  seem  to  be  discernible  in  the 
results  of  those  experiments  in  which  no  attempt  was 
made  to  stimulate  gas  production.  These  are: 

(a)  The  better  the  quality  of  the  gluten,  the 
greater  the  resistance  of  the  flour  to  reduction  in 
loaf-volume  by  starch  dilution. 

(b)  The  poorer  the  gluten,  the  less  the  difference 
in  properties  between  flour  and  added  starch,  and  hence 
the  less  the  change  on  dilution. 

It  would  appear  that  in  flours  with  good  quality 
gluten,  tendency  (a)  is  dominant,  and  that  differences 
in  gluten  quality  can  be  detected  by  the  starch  dilution 
method.  In  those  of  a  markedly  inferior  nature,  however, 


h Sv  08 


KOISBtJOei 


-.if;  -sv;  no it net Is  < noleax/oeiJb  ^T3;n:3iiX©*r,r  exit  nl 
a  ion  Dc cd-hc.  edD  neewtecT  oor:©7 iqC'.id  1st  sens  oni/l  sift  od* 
ns  cb  ot ©Him  ilaxtina  aef©a  Jbean  tsrft  £>ns  J&aYoXqflie 
■xeieeig  ..  '  ^i8t  jsI  exit  n,  . x  ■  c  tenon  x  to  zebni 

.its  in  oil  nalbansO  srxc'ita  exit  neewtscf  aonetcettib  ©si 
•t- xs£ris  ©xlt  tseicim  gxxisd  ax  &£  do  1  dvr  d&iw  molt  sinew  9rfi 
zb  :7 o  exit  no  sOTot  exit  nl  .retoella  txiamevorcquii:  exit  ai 
ni  90Xi9'X8ltif?  end*  nalsena,  exit  taxlt  ben/irsas  asw  ti  tJ5narf 
donate  exit  bna  betas!  ed  ot  *xi;oIl  exit  neewtecr  aextieqoiQ 
aiixtlua©*!  exit  e$  blsjow  iqIImiq  exit  t!i  ot  bebba 


.  t neon  iso  ti 

*  ©■< 

silt  Hi  elding© os lb  od  ot  xiissa  salon©  Met  gniaoqgo 
ssiv  tqmettB  on  rlc.’xi.;  si  a:  :  ixxxexr.a  seed!  to  3d*lus@*r 
:itxs  ©asn'T  .noitonbotcq  aaa  eislniixiis  oi  ebsiri 


aria  tneti/Is  s:it  xo  vtllsup  add  netted  erfT  (a) 

'.ri  next  oi/.don  ot  nxrolt  ©xli  to  eonsd-aieeg  exit  nsiesna 

.noxtui 

©nett in  eld*  aael  si;  t  noii/np  er£ :  teens  oq  exlT  (o') 

ao:  ;.-;a  bn.s  t-doxe.'is  bebbs  btta  molt  ites wtecf  seiinsqonq  nl 

*  •'•"• :  •:  2 :, :•  1  X  n C  £  X. , 1 3 IV 0  ©Xf  j  28  81  Oi i & 

£ix.,£i;p  Ox 03  .-5 iv  a^ri/oi.:  nl  isrfi  ■  ns  ©gas  blue w  il 
aeonansttib  isrli  Ins  t!nsniuxe£  ai  ,.sj  xoxxeJbnet  ^netx/Ig 

.!C.i5Tx..i)  flOIBj-a  9/13  -<G  69*09*®*  ®(f  XIBD  TE*iisup  HSJi'IS  ni 

‘/a.i  TjXfieiiBJn  b  . 


35 


(b)  seems  to  become  increasingly  dominant,  rendering 
comparison  with  superior  flours  impossible.  On  this 
account  the  method  cannot  be  capable  of  any  general 
application  in  the  estimation  of  gluten  quality. 

The  stimulation  of  gas  production,  in  order  to 
obtain  the  maximum  possible  loaf  volumes,  has  led  to 
more  complicated,  rather  than  simpler,  results.  No 
explanation  of  these,  other  than  that  already  suggested, 
can  be  offered  here,  though  in  view  of  the  fact  that 
loaf  volume  is  largely  governed  by  physical  factors,  the 
possible  effect  of  st&rch  dilution  on  the  physical 
properties  of  the  dough  (apart  from  mere  reduction  in 
protein  content)  should  not  be  overlooked.  Certain  facts 
of  interest  have  emerged  however . 

(i)  The  unsuitability  of  at  least  two  commercial 
diastatic  preparations  as  agents  for  the  stimulation  of 
gas  production  in  flours  has  been  demonstrated.  These 
results,  together  with  those  of  Collatz  and  Racke  (7) 
and  Sherwood  and  Bailey  (24)  indicate  the  necessity  of 
devising  some  method  for  the  purification  of  preparations 
of  this  enzyme.  On  the  other  hand,  it  has  been  shown 
that  by  the  addition  of  maltose  and  0.05  per  cent  of 
ammonium  phosphate,  loaf  volume  could  be  increased  to  a 
maximum. 

(ii)  As  already  suggested,  one  way  of  interpreting 
the  results  might  be  to  compare  the  maximum  loaf  volume 
which  the  various  flours  in  a  test  series  were  capable  of 


*  tasxr  i:x:ro£  8;:  -oed  od  esnsee  (c) 

•  ' 

froddasr  ©dd  dnuoooa 

,  - 

od*  oscno  xii  , x - i i: i cue o*v cj  ~n>i>  ‘Xo  edT 

*3-oixXiv  IboI  .  Xc  .--  •:.  .o^oixoi  c.'d  :  ;  oddo 
.  B.yIi/8©!!  ? ccU  o-  :  '  ,.o  .. o -o :i 71:00  $<zom 
- ;  o ;..  :;3  sails  dsrid  nsdd  ‘XvXvO  (£8sd:  ••  uv^d.axifilqx© 
;  1  d'O.S«  Old  1 .,  lo-jci  it..  o'  •:  .  •  ••.£:•  i.;o,  •  jc  mo 

8ii:  ?:.v  :;ob!i  iBOxavdc  %d  demey cy  X&^ibX  : i  :  .  olov  iscl 
-  .-is  :.  , .  . 

• 

*  [  . 

* 

-^iooc  mo  ov/cr  daisl  jo  Xc  i j iXlcsdxrr.xri;  e.;.,;  } 

•:  i' 91..;  r.Qx  eimoo  03  ex;oi  JBXBoeTx  oiJszaBib 
*  >;-Oo  :  11  ..  cl  :,:,x  i  'M-;:  xx.;i.  c  •.  1  i:j.. 

•  sd-jslloo  lo  eeodd  Adxw  xeddeaod  ,8d’lxra©*x 

xc,  '.'l  iiasoi'i  odd  ©dBOilxti:  (M )  ^alias'  ke  brnmedB.  bos 
> ^ v£ xq  ac  .'On  10 1  i itLirc;  sni  icx  imilcani  erica  gnieivsB 

.  ,  , 

. ‘  '  *  ••■•■■  '■  ;:  Cci  ;ji:i  -  0=  ;  i.l  ill  3  3li;  vCi  $££i4 

ie  ..o;  x  o..  blue  v  miL,j.7  rrol  i^oio^i  .lajinoianiB' 

...  ;lo:xbi:i 

ijii.  ■:  o’ic  *i0dni  to  ysw  ©no  tX©da©ss^a  >££>b@iXs  aA  (11) 

- 

11  0  -  2© in© a  deed  s  Hi  a 


axcroT::  ajjoiiBv  ©rid  do  Id 


w 


attaining  when  all  had  been  reduced  to  some  similar 
protein  content.  From  Figure  13  it  will  he  seen  that 
there  is  a  considerable  range  of  protein  contents  over 
which  the  loaf-volumes  at  any  given  protein  content 
would  be  in  the  order  Marquis,  Red  Bobs  No.  222,  Huron 
and  Vermilion;  that  is,  in  the  order  of  gluten  quality. 
Owing,  however,  to  the  differing  rates  of  decrease  in 
loaf  volume  with  dilution  exhibited  by  the  four  varieties, 
the  quantitative  results  obtained  from  such  a  procedure 
would  vary  with  the  protein  content  chosen.  The  loaf 
volumes  though  they  fell  in  the  order  of  gluten  quality, 
could  not  be  said  to  be  proportional  to  it. 

(iii)  The  variations  in  the  response  to  potassium 
bromate  and  maltose  are  of  considerable  interest.  It  is 
believed  that  the  response  due  to  bromate  is  related  to 
both  quantity  and  quality  of  gluten.  The  discovery  that 
in  "strong”  flours  the  loaf-volume  obtained  with  the 
addition  of  0.001  per  cent  potassium  bromate  was 
greater  than  the  maximum  obtained  with  the  addition  of 
maltose,  whilst  in  "weak"  flours  the  reverse  was  true 
seems  further  corroboration  of  this  view,  since  the 
maltose  presumably  acts  solely  as  a  yeast  stimulant. 

It  is  disappointing,  however,  to  observe  the  irregular 
nature  of  the  results  obtained  when  this  procedure  is 
applied  to  the  diluted  flours. 

(iv)  The  nature  of  the  curves  obtained  by  plotting 
loaf  volume  against  concentration  of  added  maltose  has 


i sltuila  ernes  ot  joou&q’i  f:09d  bexi  IXb  xrerlv*  aAiitietta 
v  :;o?2  od  IX xt  d  i  rl  oojxgi'S  mo*?!  .  txeztioc  rrietoiq 

ievo  adnediioo  xxietoiq  to  egxtsi  sldaisXu'Bnco  ,s  ai  siarlt 
,  .  -  ojjoo,:,  jtl  ■;  :■  ss.^jlov-lacl  si  11  hold w 

acfc  t  *191)1 

. 

£  •  Xo  ■'Si-JBI  o  X:  o.j  ( 'xsv&wch'  ^iiihO 

-  '  -  V  •'.•  OOj  OSllhhijiQ  £(,:  1  till  lb  iUiK/luy  ‘XBOl 


ex  ^cc'xo;  b  iIojjb  xrcn  deo ;.;.:xdo  ailooei  evXtBixij&i/p  ©at 
■  :  eux  .neaoio  d  u-tx-oo  xcietoiq  e-i  .j  ;  v  /ibv  Mjljow 

•  -  f ny 


i  asur/oq  ot  ©aaoqaei  exit  ni  enciisiisy  erift  (xxi; 

. 

ox  deislsi  ai  eo.ea o-iJ  oi  ex/X  earcoqaei  exit  texlt  Bevelled 

r~  ’v’  V,OOV  .0  erfx  » XXD 0 XO  X&tlsurj  £>iIB  ^XiJ'itBX/p  Xltod 

: 

0  0 , 

-  -  •  -  ■  .  ,  ■  g  ■ 

o:.  f.,  eci-vev.  extf  ooooli  ...ev .  oi  tsXi  .:w  teaotI.afli 
•  -  00iU^  «'*' IV  t  d-o  noiiBioef 01100  lexiiujl  arxeea 

seic 


'  *  O'* 1 1  -t  9  rf  1  9  V  *1 .;  3  do  O  .j 


-;-'0  .X  qqc sib  ax  tl 


3.  91LTU6000  ai  lit 

^LXi  JjoXq  ^cf  JbQfiijBtdo 


■’ 

* 

JSV-IUO  @:i;  to  eiutaa  aril;  (yij 
10  rioi*3^*naonoo  tfanissa  etm/Iov  ‘iso I 


37 


already  been  noted.  A  sharp  maximum  is,  in  general, 
associated  with  lo w  concentration  or  inferior  quality 
of  gluten.  This  is  analagous  to  the  well-known  lack 
of  stability  and  narrow  range  of  fermentation  tolerance 
in  weak  flours . 


SUMMARY. 


1.  The  purpose  of  this  investigation  has  been  to  ascer¬ 
tain  whether  the  baking  behaviour  of  flours  when  brought 
to  a  series  of  definite  and  comparable  protein  contents 
by  dilution  with  starch  could  be  used  to  estimate  gluten 
quality. 

2.  When  flours  are  diluted  with  starch,  the  rate  of 
decrease  in  loaf  volume  per  unit  decrease  in  protein 
content  has  no  general  application  as  a  measure  of 
gluten  quality.  This  is  true  whether  the  baking  is 
performed  with  or  without  the  stimulation  of  gas 
production. 

3.  Diastatic  activity  is  reduced  by  starch  dilution  to 
an  extent  roughly  proportional  to  the  decrease  in  the 
amount  of  flour  in  the  mixture . 

4.  The  addition  of  maltose  to  increase  gas  production 
has  proved  more  satisfactory  than  the  use  of  diastatic 
preparations,  o?/ing  to  proteolytic  enzymes  being  con¬ 
tained  in  the  latter. 


-  - 

Y^ilBnp  TOXTetni  to  xiciisTineoxioo  wol  riiiw  deieiooaaB 

j  , 

..  as  yttltd&t a  to 
.  a  '  -It  jjjc o  ii 


ioea 


.  £ 

•T.fi^cx oTcf  xxeriw  STx/oit  to  tug  i  varied  gniriBcf  exit  Texftexlw  nisi 
sd-nainoQ  niaioTq  eltisisqxco  one  si  ini ted  to  seixes  s  ox 
uSwi/xg  at.oinx :-*a©  ox  da axr  ad  dlx/oo  lOTais  rfiiw  aoitullb  yd 

»ytiJLBUp 


■  isi  «  ox  ..  o©.ti-  : ..  .  aTi-oJEt  lioxCi  »S 

a.iCy  ox  ©BBS  TO  8,5  TOO*  ©SZIjiOV  tBOX  XI  i  83.63T08X) 

x0  BTuanani  b  an  i'-iTsexXqqB  .  BTsneg  on  sari  tnainoo 

.  ... 

Qj3&  ^oxjslin  it  a  ©xii  tnoxiul  v*  to  rlttw  i3©inrotT©<j 

*  i  .;  OiidOTq 

, 

0:1  j  rxi  ^sBexoed  exit  ot  lanc-it tocgtq  yld%sso%  tnetzs  xns 

»0Toixxx;  8j.it  nl  ‘luoXt  to  tiufoxas 

. 

oxiejaaid  to  eax;  atfi  xrsrtt  Y'lotoataxiaa  aTorn  devoTq  asxi 
0n^sd  o->Al^s.iO  O.L-J Yloatonq  ox  gniwo  tanciisTBq8Tq 

. -xattBl  exit  ii  danxst 


38 


5,  The  maximum  volumes  which  a  series  of  flours  are 
capable  of  attaining  when  all  have  been  brought  to  the 
same  protein  content  by  starch  dilution  seem  to  be  in 
the  same  order  as,  though  not  necessarily  proportional 
to,  gluten  quality,  provided  that  the  degree  of 
dilution  is  not  too  high. 

6.  "Strong"  flours  give  a  greater  loaf  volume  when 
baked  with  the  addition  of  0.001  per  cent  potassium 
bromate  than  can  be  obtained  by  the  use  of  maltose 
to  increase  gas  production.  With  "weak"  flours  the 
reverse  is  true.  When  a  number  of  flours  are  reduced 
to  the  same  protein  content  by  the  addition  of  starch, 
however,  the  differences  between  loaf-volume  by  the 
bromate  and  maltose  methods  are  not  necessarily  in  the 
order  of  gluten  quality. 

7 .  When  successive  increments  of  maltose  are  added  to 
a  "weak"  flour,  in  general  the  loaf  volume  increases  to  a 
well-defined  maximum  and  then  falls  off  again.  With 
"strong"  flours  on  the  other  hand,  the  maximum  is  less 
pronounced,  and  tends  to  broaden  out  into  an  "optimum 
zone" . 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 

The  author  wishes  to  thank  Dr.  Robert  Newton,  who 
suggested  the  problem,  for  his  constantly  helpful  criticism 
and  advice,  and  Mr.  G.  D.  Macmillan  for  his  valuable  technical 
assistance . 


, '  ..  1 011/1  ..  ,7...'  ...I.  „  C 

or  td-suoid  need  ot 3d  11b  ixaxfe-  salnlatts  to  ©Xd^gso 
ni  eel  o t  mesa  noi Tulle  ilo^csda  \<5  tn&taoo  nietotn  ©ms a 
.is.noxd^CyO-iQ-  yliiszaeoen  ton  sS^uodt  .  t as  "xed’io  9msa  ell 
j;c  ererasl-  eili  ,  ..al  .Leone  tyii±ajjp  netuls  <ot 

.feinf  oo  t  ton  a  i  no  it  Hi  id 

.  a 

eaotlBin  Tc  3 ax;  odt  yo  bsniettfc  eo  nao  amid  etBsaontf 
ezio  3*xjjoI1  n>lB©wn  ld.ll  .  sxoizoubo-ic  as§  ©esenonx  c? 

.  il 

^ddisda  rio  noitihhs  out  yd  t  net  mo  nist  oig  ©mss  ©rid  od 
sriX  ©fflulov-tsoi  Heewxed  aeone1  oTXio  add  t isvawod 
-  ui  vlxisaaecv,;  n ua  alooTeo;:  eocTToe;  hon  ed&noid 

.  zi  ilsuo  netjjlo  To  *xe.;Tio 

- 

••-•1  s9as©*ioxix  smrlov  Tsoi  add  Isaexiea  ni  t‘iuolT  r?:iB©wH  b 

sIIbT  )-xi€ 

3^c'“  edd  'Jbrt&u  nedto  edit  no  anuo IT  "grto^da** 

J,-u  -i0  L'J’:a:  Xeo  naTeonc  •: t  ahneo  tnn  th eo nuononq 

.  "©no.:; 


■ICCTLTIOKIXOA 


■  *  ‘  ,  /l 

0iM'i  :o  XulqXe,i  'O^Btsxoo  shi  -io-1  ,aoIcfoTij  0£»  jjeJaeastra 
oa.  eldsi/Xev  aXxi  «*  mum*  .a  .0  .*«  fine  ,eoi*fia  fine 


-  39  - 


REFERENCES . 


(1)  BAILEY,  C.  H.  The  Chemistry  of  Wheat  Flour.  Chemical 

Catalog  Co.,  New  York.  1925. 

(2)  _  ,  and  LE  VESCONTE,  A.  M.  Physical  tests 

of  flour  quality  with  the  Chopin  extensimeter . 
Cereal  Chem.  1(1): 38-63.  1924. 

(3)  BLISH,  M.  J.  On  the  chemical  constitution  of  the 

proteins  of  wheat  flour  and  its  relation  to 
baking  strength.  J.  Ind.  Eng.  Chem.  8:138-144. 
1916. 

(4)  _ and  PINCKNEY,  A.  J.  The  identity  of 

gluten  proteins  from  various  wheat  flours. 

Cereal  Chem.  1( 6) : 309-316  .  1924. 

(5)  _ ,  and  SANBSTEDT,  R.  M.  Viscosity  studies 

with  Nebraska  wheat  flours.  Ibid.  2( 4) : 191-202 . 
1925. 

(6)  CHOPIN,  M.  Determination  of  baking  value  of  wheat 

by  measure  of  specific  energy  of  deformation 
of  dough.  Ibid.  4(1): 1-13.  1927. 

(7)  COLLATZ,  F.  A.,  and  RACKE,  D.  C.  Effects  of 

diastase  and  malt  extract  in  doughs.  Ibid. 

2(4): 213-227.  1925. 

(8)  COOK,  W.  H.  The  bound  water  of  wheat-flour 

suspensions  in  relation  to  baking  strength. 

Univ.  of  Alberta,  M.Sc.  thesis,  (unpublished). 

(9)  CROSS,  R.  J.  and  SWAIN,  R.  E.  The  amino  acid 

distribution  in  proteins  of  wheat  flours. 

Ind.  Eng.  Chem.  16:49-52.  1924. 

(10)  GEDDES,  W.  F.  Chemical  and  physico-chemical  changes 

in  wheat  and  wheat  products  induced  by 
elevated  temperatures.  III.  The  influence 
of  germ  constituents  on  baking  quality  and 
their  relation  to  improvement  in  flour  induced 
by  heat  and  chemical  improvers.  Can.  Jour. 

Res.  2(3) : 195-213.  1930. 

(11)  GORTNER,  R.  A.  Viscosity  as  a  measure  of  gluten 

quality.  Cereal  Chem.  1(2): 75-81.  1924. 

(12)  _ .  Correlation  of  loaf  volume  with  the 

peptizing  action  of  salts  on  wheat  flour  proteins. 
Proc.  Soc .  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  24:530-532.  1929. 


:m©ilO 


tSJQ  1%  &3i 


to  vzdai; 


.  ,0  i 

.  -  -  -  X  -  •  . 


-  .  .  •  . 

-  '  .  ..  .  r"~T  ’  To 

1)1  , 


'  '  'ioX  r,  777  3  X  ::  7  ....  ,:.0  7XtX  ...  •  . 

cj  qo Ifslei  a $i  tna  'xuolt  taeoXy  to  aaie&o*xq 

■ 


to  ~r$£  trroli;  ad*T 
<  It 

*  Xtol 


•  X  » vi  <Y;  i-Iiltt.  c  \3  .  _ 

x,ifxx^BV  noil  adotoiq  rtsSxrlg 
*  -X 


a  9  i  b  irx  a  ^  t  la  o  o;a  1  ¥ 

,  ' 


X'  <XYY?XGm  o;xo  , 

.  call 


{ c; ) 


<10-1  v  X9j|  '10  qqt&.IO  OXtXDCqc  to  8X7re.06.uX  vcT 

■  .  . 


.ct  . 

5 

*  >-,u...  ,  .  .  .>■  .qx  :  .:.  : 

~J  •"  1  •'  '  ;  •  ■  Xou/oX  SOX  ,  ,  /,  /, 

.  .  ■’  w  x-:-  -  0'.ii  ixioo  Ou  not  £  ki  Xe*x  r;X  atci  o.asrajja 

::  "  -  ■  -sXaouX  ,oXx,X  .  ..  :  ,-xX..  .  to  .  vXXil 


. 

*  :  J-  -  X O  -  :.  X  ;  o  1  .  :  •  5  :  ,  3 r ;;; ;7  .  f\iT  ; 

■  3  * 

tax.  -  v..  .  7;  X  .  aeadBieqme#  bet&vele 

:  13  XX-713X.7;  qixixaod  no  alnedit aaoo  7-97  to 
^;X  \x  iTi  •r^7:XeVC)tC;fili  ct  XICXtBlOl  uX3.1t 

•  0  ■ 

*  -xi  .  r la-xei :  ;  A  )s  ,  ae; 


IT9t  L 


x°  9^3fla:.i  s  3B  {ttaooeiv 

■ 


.  .txloxrp 


II 3 


iw 


ov  tad 
X;39jXW  no 

•  XS  .  bC! 


, 

xil 

••  •■■  ■  ■'  ■  .  -jx-I  .  00.  ,  00 '7 


(IX) 
(v5X  / 


40 


(13)  _  and  DOHERTY,  E.  II.  Hydration 

capacity  of  gluten  from  "strong"  and  "weak" 
flours.  Jour.  Agr.  Res.  13(8) : 389-419 .  1918. 

(14)  _  ,  HOFFMAN ,  W.  F.,  and  SINCLAIR,  W.  B. 

The  peptization  of  wheat  flour  proteins  by 
inorganic  salt  solutions.  Cereal  Chem. 

6(1) : 1-8 .  1929. 

(15)  GREIYE,  E.  and  BAILEY,  C.  H.  The  concentration  of 

glutenin  and  other  proteins  in  various  types 
of  wheat  flour.  Ibid.  4( 3) : 230-247 .  1927. 

(16)  HERTZ,  E.  The  determination  of  the  gluten  con¬ 

stituents  in  flour  and  their  relation  to 
bread-making  qualities.  Miller’s  Review 
35(6) : 170-171.  1916. 

(17)  JOHNSON,  A.  H.,  and  BAILEY,  C.  H.  Gluten  of  flour 

and  gas  retention  of  wheat  flour  doughs.  Cereal 
Chem.  2(2): 95-106.  1925. 

(18)  LARMOUR,  R.  K.  Relation  between  protein  content  and 

quality  of  wheat  as  shown  by  different  baking 
methods.  Ibid.  7(l}:35-48.  1930. 

(19)  _ ,  and  MACLEOD,  A.  G.  A  study  of  the 

basic,  bromate,  and  blend  baking  formulae  as 
means  for  determining  wheat  quality,  with 
special  reference  to  low  grade  wheat  of  the 
crop  of  1928.  Sci.  Agr.  10(1): 1-22.  1929. 

(20)  MALL0CH,  J.  G.  Modifications  of  Rumsey’s  method  for 

the  determination  of  di astatic  activity  in  flour. 
Cereal  Chem.  6(3) : 175-181 .  1929. 

(21)  _  .  Studies  on  the  resistance  of  wheat 

starch  to  diastatic  action.  Can.  Jour.  Res. 

1(2): 111-143.  1929. 

(22)  RASK,  0.  S.,  and  ALSBERG,  C.  L.  A  viscosimetric 

study  of  wheat  starches.  Cereal  Chem. 

1(1) : 7-26 .  1924. 

(23)  RUMSEY,  L.  A.  The  diastatic  enzymes  of  wheat  flour 

and  their  relation  to  flour  strength.  Amer . 

Inst.  Baking.  Bui.  8.  1922. 

(24)  SHERWOOD,  R.  C.,  and  BAILEY,  C.  H.  Control  of 

diastatic  activity  in  wheat  flour.  I. 

Production  of  diastatic  flour  and  effects  of  large 
dosages.  Cereal  Chem.  3( 2) : 107-136 .  1926. 


.  . 

Tlsew"'  Xjxb  -3 noTts*'  ott'a  :s7ul;r  to  ^tir-Boao 
.  ..::.«i  .  dto-goo  :  i.6  ;ra  .  .  ...  >  tv  ,  tajoX  .  si  jo  It 

. 

.  'vu  oxiled'o^q  'XAio.it  c?  ;:e;iw  to  fAuitBsTTgiq  erlT 

.  anox 

•  u'i  ...  .  : ~>X  ;  ;l  V 

-  .  H  .  0  •  . 

as-;  3i/ox,iBT  at  anioioxc  T9flto  fine  atuetvlg 
.  -  -  .  . 

ot  ircxtsXas:  Tiailt  bne  -me  11  al  stnsx/tits 
■ 

.axex  .i:x~o?X:(o 
.  -  ,  * .  r  , 

. 

.gZQL  .oOX-d  .  :  ;S  1  lOxiD 

* 

oai:tBd  lae^ieVUb  v;cf  nworfa  as  tserfw  to  vtxXstfp 

;  .  o.  .  ..  .  .  ■ 


.  - 

03  ss-uxuxol;  ;3£xx>IscT  ftnelcf  J&iis  <  ©tsoic-T-d  ,  oTSSIT 
,  ‘xiiioop  toerior  ooi 'ixiioxoooo  too  ansa© 
adt  to  t.asriw  .3X0*13  we  I  ox  aoTeTatsT  Xsioecra 

■ 

o'.  . IQl-dVl : 


■ 

.330  .  Tij-ol.  .ns 0  .xioxtoB  oitstssXS  oFlToxSJa 

.0091  .'PX-XXX:  su 


1X3) 


.  <  .  t 

•  o'eu.-  ...ootsO  .  aeiloTs  j  o  tselv?  to  vbu: a 

* ~v..;- x  .  as~?  *  ;x  }x 

TuoXt  taerfw  to  as^siie  oitstas  , . 

*  ' 1  ~*  . rrx;.-.j.\©Tta  a;a  t  t  .ocitaXsT  TxarfcJ*  jbxis 

'  -  .  .  X  :  .. 


eoTsl 


•°  ..... 

....  .woll  iserfw  ni  ottsiaalb 

. 

. 


Ua) 


41 


(25)  WELLS ,  H.  G. ,  and  OSBORNE,  T.  B.  The  biological 

reactions  of  the  vegetable  proteins.  I. 
Anaphylaxis.  J.  Infect.  Dis.  8:66-124.  1911. 

(26)  _ .  Is  the 

specificity  of  the  anaphylaxis  reaction 
dependent  on  the  chemical  constitution  of 
the  proteins  or  on  their  biological  relation? 

The  biological  reactions  of  the  vegetable 
proteins.  Ibid.  12:541-558.  1915. 

(27)  WORKING,  E.  B.  The  action  of  phosphatides  in 

bread  dough.  Cereal  Chem.  5(5) : 225-254.  1928. 

(28)  .  Some  oxidising  effects  of  flour 

bleaching.  Ibid.  5(5) : 451-455.  1928. 


' 

« -.  ■: '  -  0  .  .  u  0:  i  -  ;  ,  '  ,  s  . l.v  ■  39 

... 

•  -  ^  ;  tV.  '  J  JlTtl 

■  to  :{.•  icaa<jo  iBohitOxio  c\j  no  ixobn sues 
■ -  ■  :  J 01  .-0™-.V  xd  uac; :  *r<j  sr~ 

■'  :  '  •  •'  '  -  •"  .0  -  .v-:  .  .  .  ...•  i 

-  '  ■■■••■■.  S  «  , ... 

...  :  .. ,  i  . ;  / 

.  ■ 

-  -  -U  S'  /  0©  v le  -  .  \  ,  . ,  •  :.o.  ,  / 33  ; 

—so :  ,  -  : . >3*0—: 3—