This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project
to make the world's books discoverable online.
It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.
Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the
publisher to a library and finally to you.
Usage guidelines
Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Maintain attribution The Google "watermark" you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe.
About Google Book Search
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web
at|http : //books . google . com/
I
N*^-^-'»^:
y.-f
^- ^ ♦
.Si-v
'^^^
^
^
^
•^^
.^^-iWai
t • -7 ft & -fr % \ \
J & BMtau- Ui Biat- 1845 .
THE HISTORY
OF THE
TOWN AOT) CASTLE
OF
TAMWORTH,
• IN THE COUNTIES OF STAFFORD & WARWICK.
CHARLES FERRERS PALMER.
TAMWORTH:
JONATHAN TH01IF80N, BOOKSELLEE, MARKET STREET.
LONDON: J. B. AND J. 6. NICHOLS.
M.DCCC.XLV.
THE NEW YORK
PUBLIC LIBRARY
ASTCR, LENOX AND
TlU/tN f- ;,DATION«.
• •••
• ! , ••» • • ••
••• : ••• *•* •• •
•• •
• • •
TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
SIR ROBERT PEEL, BARONET,
FIRST LORD OP HER MAJESTY'S TREASURY,
AND
MEMBER OP PARLIAMENT
POR THE
THIS WORK
IS, BY PERMISSION, MOST RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED
BY HIS OBLIGED AND OBEDIENT SERVANT,
THE AUTHOR.
PREFACE.
In presentiiig "Thb History of thb Town anb
Castle of Tamworth" to the public^ and more espe-
cially to those connected with^ and taking an interest
in^ these places^ it is deemed that little apology is due.
It might, perhaps, be thought that a work, the object
of which was confined to a particular locality, lying in
the midst of an agricultural district, and fur removed
firom the busy scenes of the camp or the court, would
afford only scanty matter claiming general interest, and
deserving particular attention. But in the history o(
this town, there are found incidents of national impor-
tance, which elevate it far above the generality of
similar places in the kingdom. Its great celebrity
during the existence of the Mercian nation, and in
Saxon ages when the heptarchy had been completely
abolished; its ancient Church and Castle, with other
remains which still stand amidst the ruins of the
past; and its connection with some of the highest
and most eminent men, both in early and recent times,
render Tamworth worthy of notice to the historian, the
architect, and the antiquary.
From its peculiar situation in two counties, Tamworth
has, in one respect, laboured under great disadvantage*
Writers have either confined themselves to one or other
of the counties of which they might be speaking; or,
if the limits of their subject embraced both, they have
been enabled to give little more than a passing glance.
VI.
their field of obsemttion being too extended to enter
deeply into this part of their subject. It has, therefore,
happened that, owing to the want of an investigation
of the local records, a full history has never yet been
given. It is true that, nearly twenty years ago, a
"History of the Borough and Parish of Tamworth" was
undertaken by John and Henry Wood Boby; but only
one part of the work, including the general history to
the termination of the Anglo-Saxon domination, ever
appeared. The death of one of the gentlemen, and the
residence of the other abroad, have prevented the
probability of its being completed. Subsequently a
publication, reflecting much credit on its author, was
brought out, under the title of "Illustrations of Tam-
worth," by Etienne Bruno Hamel. It consisted of
views and drawings of different parts, with a short
description and condensed narrative. These constitute
the whole of the endeavours dedicated solely to the
elucidation of the history of this town.
Claiming Tamworth as his native place, the author
of the present work naturally felt a deep interest in
its welfare ; and he spent much of his time in exploring
its early history. At first, he did not contemplate that
the result of his investigations should ever be laid
before the public. But as matter accumulated in his
hands, he was led to imagine that, at some period,
he might publish the fruits of several years' labour.
His researches, indeed, were extended much beyond the
limits he anticipated, in consequence of his having been
permitted to inspect the records of the Corporation and
of the Church, and many valuable documents in the
hands of private persons. Such advantages have enabled
him to present the History to his readers.
It can hardly be supposed that a work, demanding
the most extensive researches in the national archives,
and in the collections of private £euaulies, should pre-
sent that completeness and correctness which might be
desired. Indeed, the author must acknowledge that,
from circumstances over which he had no control,
many deficiencies occur. Much interesting matter he
has been compelled to omit, from his not having
been able to discover the whole of the connecting cir-
cumstances, the records eluding his vigilance, or being
placed beyond the range of his inspection. In &ct, as
the work progressed through the press, he was unex-
pectedly put into the possession of numerous facts,
which served to add greatly to his subject. The
principal of these have been embodied in the addenda.
It is almost certain that future investigations will bring
to light other matters, and indicate that the History
gives little more than a general outline. But the author
hopes that the errors which may exist are rather those
of omission than commission, and that, in what he has
given, much will be found that has hitherto been
imknown, and that may prove of some importance to
the historian and the antiquary.
Such as it is, this maiden effort of the author is now
given to the public as a humble contribution to the
topographical literature of the day. With neither of
the works on the same subject previously alluded to,
does the History assimilate. Although it has been
unavoidably necessary to retrace the ground over which
the Messrs. Boby passed, yet even there facts have been
introduced which had escaped the observation of those
erudite writers. In the style, it has been the author's
principal object to express his meaning in a clear and
VUl.
simple maimer. Yet, striving to avoid the formality
of antiquarian detail^ and laxity by the adoption of
too irrelative matter, he has endeavoured, at the same
time, to engage the attention of the antiquary and
excite the interest of the general reader. No remu-
neration has been sought: but should the author have
succeeded in elucidating the History of the town of
Tamworth and of its Castle, and in bringing this once
illustrious place into greater notice, his labour will be
amply rewarded.
It would be an unpardonable neglect on the part
of the author, where he not publicly to acknowledge,
and to express his thanks for, the very great kindness
of many persons, who have, with almost unprecedented
liberality, aided him in his researches and enquiries.
To the right honourable sir Robert Peel, bart., thanks
are especially due, not only on account of the interest
which he has expressed in the History, but also for
the liberal offer of the use of his extensive library at
Drayton-manor, rich in topographical works, and for
search made by his direction in the British Museum
regarding the subject of the earl of Richmond's
passage from Lichfield to Tamworth. Sir George Chet-
wynd, bart., of Grendon-hall, Warwickshire, furnished
some important matter, particularly to the account of
the local tokens. To the rev. Francis Blick, and the
rev. R. C. Savage, late vicars of Tamworth, the author
owes the use of the Parish-registers, and the principal
particulars of the royal Mintage, and of the population.
The present vicar, the rev. E. Harston, afforded him
the aid he needed regarding the National School. To
the rev. John Moore, of St. Chad's, Birmingham, he is
indebted for the free use of the very valuable library
belonging to the Roman Catholic bishop: and to the
lev. James Kelly^ of Tamworth^ for much information.
The municipal body, and the town-clerk, Francis Wil-
lington, esq., he must thank for access to the extensive
records belonging to the town: Thomas Bramall, esq.;
E. B. Hamel, esq.; F. J. Hamel, esq.; Mrs. Woody,
of the Moat-house; Mrs. Roby, of Bridgenorth; and
numerous others, for the use of many and very im-
portant documents. The author is also bound to
acknowledge the kindness he has experienced from
the late vicar and churchwardens, in being permitted
every facility which he needed in his investigations
through the Church, particularly for allowance unhesi-
tatingly granted to expose the painting on the wall of
the south Transept. Such liberality demands particular
notice at a time when it is seldom exhibited; and
it is more deserving of acknowledgment in the peculiar
position in which the author was placed.
The author considers that he ought not, in conclusion,
to omit giving his meed of praise to the publisher,
through whom the History has been destined to appear
much sooner than had ever been anticipated. The
production of the work, at this time, is entirely owing
to his enterprising spirit; which he has effected at a
trouble and expense which the limited sale of a local
history cannot remunerate. His merits at the hands of
the public will not be lessened by such faults as may
occur in the compilation itself: for these the author
alone must be responsible.
C. F. P.
8, Great Charles St., Birmingham.
December 1st, 1845.
ILLUSTRATIONS.
PAGB.
Map of the Borough of Tunworth Fronti^ieoe.
Silver penny of Edward the Confessor '. . 49.
Silver penny of William the Conqueror 50.
Arms of the family of Willington 129.
Penny token of John Harding 153.
Half-penny token of the reT. F. Bliok 153.
View of Tamworth from the South 175.
Common Seal of the CoU^giate Church . . 222.
Arms of the family of Repington 231.
Anns of the family of k Court 238.
Interior of the Crypt in the Church 253.
Ancient inscriptton on the wall of the Crypt 255.
Section of the staircase in the Church-Tower 270.
Arms of tiie family of Townshend 377.
Groond-plan of the Castle 404.
Arms of the fkmily of Feel 436.
View of Drayton Manor 439.
Bolebridge and the Anker Viaduct 486.
Arms of the family of Wolferstan 496.
LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS.
Bfajor Greneral ^ Courts Axnington Hall^ large paper.
Captain Edward H. ^ Court, R.N., M.P., one large and
one small paper.
Charles Bowyer Adderley, Esq., M.P., Hams Hall,
large paper.
Quartermaster John Alexander, Store-master, Boyal Horse
Artillery Barracks, Woolwich.
Mr. Bichard Allen, Bookseller, Nottingham.
Richard Bird, Esq., Tamworth, S large paper.
E. L. Blackbume, Esq., F. S. A., London.
Bliss Blick, Bonehill, large paper.
Matthew H. Bloxam, Esq., Bugby.
John B. Botham Esq., Birmingham, large paper.
Sir W. Boyd, Knight and M. D., London.
C. Holte Bracebridge, Esq., The Hall, Atherstone.
Thomas Bramall, Esq., Tamworth, large paper.
The Bight Honorable Lord Brooke, Warwick Castle,
large paper.
Robert Cave Browne, Esq., Tamworth, large paper.
Richard Calron, Esq., Bury, Lancashire, large paper.
Sir George Chetwynd, Bart., Grendon Hall, large paper.
Sir C. Mansfield Clarke, Bart., Wigginton Lodge,
large paper.
XU. LIST OF 8UB8CRIBSB8.
Mr. Chinn, Birmingham^ large paper.
Miss Clarke^ Bamsley, Yorkshire^ large paper,
Mr. Charles Clarson, Tamworth.
Mr. Cooke, Bookseller, Warwick.
Thomas Cooper, Esq., junior. West Smithfield. London.
Miss Cotterill, Hinckley, Leicestershire.
Mr. William Cox, Derby and Tamworth, large paper.
Mr. Thomas Cox, Tamworth.
Mrs. Daniel Alban Durtnall, Aldergate House, Tamworth,
large paper.
Mr* Darley, Bookseller, Burton-upon-Trent, one large
and one email paper.
Mrs. Dawes, Tamworth.
Mr. Dumolo, Dunton House, Coleshill.
Mr. Edmund Eaton, Tamworth.
Miss Ellison, Tamworth.
Marmion Edward Ferrers, Esq., Baddesley Clinton, War-
wickshire, large paper.
Charles Fisher, Esq., Aldermills, Tamworth.
Mr. George Flint, Tamworth.
Mr. William Freeman, Tamworth.
Robert Gamer, Esq., Stoke-upon-Trent
Mr. J. Glover, Bangley, near Tamworth.
Benjamin Granger, Esq., Burton-upon-Tzent, large paper.
Joseph Gray, Esq., Tamworth, large paper.
John Hall, Esq., Tamworth, large paper.
Robert Hanbury, Esq., Bole Hall, Tamworth, large paper.
Miss Hanbury, Curborough.
LIST 07 BXTBSCEIBEBS. XUl.
Mr. Samuel Hanson^ Tamworth, one large SfonesmaHpaper.
Etienne B. Hamel^ ^Bsq.^ Tamworth.
Felix John Haxnel^ ^Bsq.^ Islington^ London.
William Hardiog, Esq.^ Prestwich^ Lancashire^ large paper.
Charles Harding^ Esq.^ Bole Hall^ Tami;?orth.
Jevan Harper^ Esq., Mitchell Dean, Gloucestershire.
Charles Harper, Esq., BuUo Fill, near Newnham.
John Dove Harris, Esq., Leicester, large paper.
The Bey. Edward Harston, Vicar of Tamworth, large
paper.
S. B. Harston, Esq., Islington, London, large paper.
Miss Hawkesworth, Tamworth.
Mr. Thomas Hill, Drayton Bassett.
Mr. John Hill, Tamworth.
Edward Hollins, Esq., Stockport, large paper.
Thomas Houlston, Esq., Canonbury Flace, Islington,
London.
Job Hunter, Esq., Islington, London, large paper.
The Bey. Oeorge Inge, Thorpe Constantino, Tamworth.
John Jones, Esq., Tamworth.
Mr. Henry Jones, Farish Clerk, Tamworth.
The Ber. James Kelly, Tamworth, large paper.
James Kennedy, Esq., M.D., Woodhouse, near Lough-
borough, large paper.
Mr. Kirk, Tamworth.
Joseph Knight, Esq., Leicester, large paper.
Mr. Lakin, Bookseller, Tamworth.
William Landor, Esq., Bugeley.
Mr. Langbridge, Bookseller, Birmingham, one large and
one small paper.
XIV. LIST OF SUBSCRIBSBS.
The Rev. R. W. Lloyd, Wilnecote.
Mr. Lomax, Bookseller, Lichfield, one large and one
small paper,
Mrs. Lucas, Tamworth, large paper.
Mr. Maher, Bookseller, Birmingham, one large and one
smaU paper.
John Shaw Manley, Esq., Manley Hall, large paper.
Messrs. J. and C. Mort, Advertiser Office, Stafford.
Charles Ed. E. Mousley, Esq., Haunton Hall, large paper.
Robert Nevill, Esq., Tamworth, large paper.
Messrs. J. B. and J. G. Nichols, Parliament Street,
London, S large and S small paper.
The Rev. Francis K Paget, Rural Dean, Elford Rectory,
large paper.
Shirley Palmer, Esq., M. D., Birmingham, large paper.
Mr. Shirley Fielding Palmer, Birmingham, large paper.
Miss Charlotte E. Palmer, Birmingham, 2 large paper.
Edward Fielding Palmer, Esq., Tamworth.
Mr. Henry Andrew Palmer, Birmingham, one large and
one smaU paper.
Mr. Charles Ferrers Palmer, Birmingham, 5 large and
one smaU paper.
William Parsons, Esq., Wilnecote, large paper.
Mrs. Parsons, Tamworth, 2 large and S smaU paper.
Miss Sophia Parr, Lichfield.
Mrs. Passam, Bonehill, Fazeley.
Mr. Pearson, Lichfield.
The Right Honorable Sir Robert Peel, Bart., M. P.,
Drayton Manor and Whitehall Gardens, Lon-
don, 10 large paper.
LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS. XV.
The Right Honorable William Yates Peel^ Bagginton
Hall, Coventry, large paper.
Miss Dorothy FeiciTal, Kildare, Ireland, large paper.
Mr. William Platts, Tamworth.
Mr. Thomas Powell, Stafford.
Henry John Pye, Esq., Clifton Hall, large paper.
Henry Badford, Esq., Atherstone, large paper.
Mr. Joseph Bhoades, King's Arms Hotel, Tamworth,
large paper.
Mr. J. Castle Bighton, Tamworth.
William Bobinson, Esq., Bonehill Cottage, Tamworth.
J. S. Salt, Esq., 9, Bussell Square, London.
William Salt, Esq., 9, Bussell Square, London.
The Bev. B. C. Savage, Vicar of Nuneaton, one large
and one email paper.
T. H. Sharpies, Esq., Tamworth.
John Shawe, Esq., Tamworth.
Mr. Thomas Short, Bookseller, Hinckley.
Mr. E. W. Short, Bookseller, Nuneaton.
Basset Smith, Esq., Grammar School, Walsall.
Mrs. Smith, Millfield House, Tamworth.
Mr. J. Smith, Bridgenorth, Salop.
William Staunton, Esq., Longbridge Hall, Warwick,
large paper.
Thomas Brook Bridges Stevens, Esq., Tamworth.
Mrs. Stevens, Huntingdon.
John Thompson, Esq., Tamworth.
The Bev. Cyprian Thompson, Fazeley.
Miss Thompson, Stanmer Park, Lewes.
William Tongue, Esq., Comberford Hall.
XVI. IJ8T OF 8UB8CBIBSR8.
Lord Charles Vere Ferrars Townshend^ Rainham^ Norfolk^
and 28, Cavendish Square^ London, large paper.
Captain John Townshend, B.N., 58, Eaton Square,
London, large paper.
Mr. Tunnadine, Tamworth.
William C. Webb, Esq., Tamworth, large paper.
Baron D. Webster, Esq., Perm's Hall, Sutton Coldfield.
Charles K E. Welchman, Esq., Lichfield, large paper.
Mr. Wesley, Bookseller, Burton-upon-Trent.
The Rev. R. Vernon Whitby, Osbaston Lodge, Hinckley.
Frands Willington, Esq., Town Clerk, Tamworth,
2 large paper.
Mr. James Wilson, Soho Hill, Handsworth.
R. W. Winfield, Esq., The Hawthorns, Edgbaston,
Birmingham, large paper.
John Fawkener Winfield, Esq., The Hawthorns, Edg-
baston, Birmingham, large paper.
Miss Wolferstan, Tamworth Castle, large paper.
Stanley Pipe Wolferstan, Esq., Statfold Hall, large paper.
Mrs. Woody, Moat House, Tamworth, large paper.
John F. Woody, Esq., Moat House, Tamworth, large paper.
Robert Isham Woody, Esq., Stockport, large paper.
John Wright, Esq., Tamworth.
HISTORY OF TAMWORTH.
SITUATION.
When in its butka no longer flows
Tbe Anker's dour and sparkling stream.
And Tame withholds Its gentle coarse,
lliy memoTf, Tsmworth, as a dream,
Shall, by tradition's voice alone.
Then be told.
Thy place forgotten, bnt as one
Once of old.
The town of Tamwoirth lies on the northern banks of
two rivers^ the Tame and the Anker. The western part
is placed in the southern division of the hundred of
Offlow in Staffordshire^ and the eastern^ which is rather
the larger, in the Tamworth division of that of Hem-
lingford in Warwickshire. From the situation of the
Church, the town is generally considered as belonging
to the former county. Its distance from the metropolis
is 102 miles in a direct line, or 120, by the London
and Birmingham and the Derby Junction railways. It
is also 24 miles from Stafford; 7, from Lichfield; 28,
from Warwick; 15, fix)m Birmingham; and 19, from
Coventry. It is in the diocese of Lichfield, in the rural
deanery of Tamworth and Tutbury, and within the
jurisdiction of the archbishop of Canterbury. Its latitude
is 62^ S8' n'\b N., and its longitude, V 40' 12" W.;
so that all astronomical phoenomena occur 6' 40''.8,
or about one-ninth of an hour, later than at the royal
observatory at Gbreenwich.^
1 Roby's History of Tamworth.
2 TAMWORTH
The situation of Tamworth, for the richness of its
scenery and the fertility of its soil^ ranks highly among
those parts of England, on which nature has laid her
bounteous hand, and bestowed some of her choicest favours.
Though possessing none of the majestic grandeur found
alone in mountainous parts, it exhibits all those soft and
pleasing traits which meadow, hill, and woodland can
afford. Placed on the side of a rising ground that has
a southern aspect, the town is protected, in a great
measure, from the bleak north. The direction of the
surrounding country is the same, being more or less
hilly on three sides, whilst on the south a widely ex-
tended valley lies open, diversified by the gentle windings
of the river.
The neighbourhood is highly cultivated, being one of
the first agricultural districts in the centre of the kingdom.
It has been long noted for the excellence of its fruits
and other vegetable productions, some being preferred
even to those of the vale of Evesham, though not cul-
tivated to so great extent as there and in different parts
of Worcestershire. Many other important advantages also
accrue to Tamworth firom the peculiar geological charac-
ters of its situation. The town seems to constitute the
point for the meeting of four different formations. On
the north, red marl occurs, extending to the extremity
of Derbyshire, and then passing across the middle of
Staffordshire. The clay by the town has been used, for
a very considerable period, in manufacturing bricks. On
the east, is a large coal-field, affording fuel of a sup-
erior quality ; and, for many years, pits have been work-
ed at Kettlebrook within two miles, as well as near
Folesworth and Atherstone at a greater distance. Passing
firom the south east to the edge of the town, is a
CASTLB AND TOWN. 8
luurrow band of the formation known as that of the
mill-fltone grit, from whence a very good material may
be obtained. The remaining country, including the whole
of the east and a greater part of the south, consists of
new red sand-stone, occupying the whole of the south
<rf Staffordshire, in the midst of which lie the coal beds
of Dudley, Bilston, and Cannock. On the west, at
Hints, Hopwas hays, and Tamhom park, a high range
of hills formed of gravel and sand-stone uprears itself,
coT^red with extensive woods, relics of the ancient forest
of Arden.
It is irrelative to the object of our present undertak-
ing to enter fully into the details either of the geology,
or of the zoology, or botany, of the district. What we
have said has only been intended to give a general idea
of the characters of the situation of Tamworth. The
consideration of these branches of science would well
occupy a separate work. Here a large field is extended
that has never been fully examined, though it once
formed the subject of the researches of WiUoughby, and
and afforded ample scope for the investigations of the
celebrated Ray. The book of nature lies widely open,
inviting each one to read its spotless page, and partake
of its pure and chaste delights. There may the busy
find relaxation from his toils, and the idle, emplojrment
for his mind. The innocent may drink of clear and
unpolluted streams of knowledge, and the guilty learn
where true and unfailing pleasures may be found. In
HiB works, who maintains the lowest creature there,
a source of lasting contemplation is afforded to the faith-
ful. The infidel too may see, written in clear and
effulgent characters, the laws and order of nature, that
disprove the existence of the mere chance, he fain would
4 TAMWORTH
exalt as the creating and legislative power of the universe.
Nor yet^ in conclusion, should we neglect to point
out those objects in the neighbourhood worthy of the
notice of the antiquary. He too, who loves to dwell
on scenes of former days, may visit, within the compass
of a few miles, spots whose very names echo the voice
of ages fled, and bring again remembrance of the past.
Not £ur away BtUl stand the mouldering ruins of the
earliest convent in these parts, raised by the great mon-
arch Ecgberht as a habitation for his daughter Editha^
whom Modwen taught and Lyne and Osythe led. There
are also other cloister shades^ the walls now changed to
a different use, once the recluses' dwelling. The high
mound still marks the battle field where Saxons fought,
and the Mercian king was slain by an usurper, who
himself, in his turn, was doomed to fall before the ex-
piration of the year. The tombs where Romans sleep
may partly yet be seen, known as the butts of Robin
Hood, because, as tradition tells, he often there exercised
his skill with his merry company. Many other objects
of equal interest still remain around the town, to which
we cannot particidarly allude in this place.
RIVERS.
THE TAME.
Flowing from numerous sources south of Cannock
chase, in the neighbourhood of Dudley, Oldbury, Walsall,
and Wednesbury in Staffordshire, the Tame takes its
course by Hampstead house and Perry hall. Curving
south east, it enters Warwickshire, passes north of Aston,
and then receives on the right Hockley brook, and the
river Bea, the Styx of modem times after a passage
through Birmingham from near Moseley. Continuing to
the north of Castle Bromwich, East brook from about
Sutton Coldfield joining it at Berwood hall, by Water
Orton, and to the south of Curdworth, it is increased
on the right hand at Marston park by the united waters
of the Cole and Blythe. The former of these rivers
commences by several heads about Sheldon and Tardley,
runs through Coleshill park, by Coleshill, and then hastens
to its junction with the Blythe. The latter springs from
about Bickenhill and Meriden, and, on the west of Pack-
ington, assumes a northward course between Coleshill
and Maxtoke castle to Blythe hall, and soon after ter-
minates. The Tame, about a quarter of a mile further,
is augmented by the river Bourne, originating in two
streams, one from between FiUongley and Ansley, the
other from near Bentley. Skirting Lea Marston, it then
pursues a northern direction to Kingsbury, receives Thistle-
wood brook on the right, and then continues by Cliff
6 TAirWOBTH
hall. Between this place and Dosthill, it is added to
on the left^ fiist by Langley'B and CoUett's brooks from
the east of Sutton Coldfield and Canwell ; secondly, by
Gallows brook ; thirdly by a long stream, from Canwell
and Basset's pole, which runs between Drayton Basset
and Middleton, and constitutes in the greater part of its
course the boundary of the counties of Warwick and
Stafford. The Tame, after being increased by the Black
or Bourne brook coming from near Weeford and Hints,
then enters the borough of Tamworth, and flows east of
Fazeley to the town, formii^ from a little distance off
Gallows brook the line of demarcation between the above
stated coimties.
After the confluence of the Anker with it, the Tame
turning westward wholly re-enters Staffordshire, waters
the edge of the town, continues by Millfield and Alder-
mills, and, assuming again its northern direction, passes
by Hopwas hays and Tamhom park to Comberford, where
it leaves the borough. At Elford, it makes a bend to
the west, but suddenly resumes its former course at
Fisherwick, runs by Croxall, and fidls into the Trent not
£Eur from the junction of the Mease with that river.
At Tamworth, the banks of the Tame are 150 feet
above the level of the tide of the Thames at Brentford.'
It was once proposed to render the river navigable fitmi
the Trent to this town ; and, on the £Oth of December,
1759, the bailifb and commonality, with the inhabitants
of Birmingham, Burton-on-Trent, and the neighbouring
parts, presented a petition for that purpose to the lower
house of parliament* But soon afterwards the scheme,
which would have involved immense expense, was pro*
dently abandoned.
1 Pitt*« Acricaltnra of Steffordahire.
2 Joanial of the Commont. Rob7*« Hist, of Tunworth.
CASTLE AND TOWN.
THE ANKER,
The Anker^ oommenciiig in many heads between
Wc^Tey and Withybrook in Warwickshire^ runs to the
left of Burton Hastings. Turning from north west to
west^ it passes Chilvers Coton (where it receives on the
left Ghriff brook)^ continues northward through Nuneaton,
and winds in its first direction by Weddington, Caldecote,
and Mancetter to the old Roman road, the Watling
street. For about three miles farther, it forms the
boundary of the counties of Leicester and Warwick,
going on by Witherley, and receiving above Atherstone
the Sence on the right hand. The river Sence, lying
wholly in Leicestershire, rises east of Bardon hill in
Chamwood forest, runs by Hugglescote, and, joined by
Blower's brook from Ravenstone, continues south west
by Heather, Shakerstone, and Congerstone, to Sheepy,
being then united to the main trunk of another origin.
This southern Sence has its source about Market Bos-
worth, Stapleton, Dadlington (by which the Tweed, a river
near from Hinckley, falls into it), and Stoke Golding,
passing by Sibson and Radcliffe Culey in its way. The
Anker flows on by Grendon, Polesworth, Pooley hall,
then, entering the borough of Tamworth, by Alvecote
priory, now a private residence, and Amington. Curving
round southwards, and skirting Bolehall and the War-
wickshire part of the town, it mingles its waters with
those of the Tame beneath the Castle grounds.
8 TAMWOBTH
The characters of the two rivers are very diverse even
near their point of .junction, some plants being often
confined to one alone. The Tame is in general shallow
and slow in its course, whilst the Anker is deep, nar-
row, and winds considerably. Michael Drayton, the poet,
bom at Hartshill, a village a few miles distant ftom this
town, has commemorated the latter river in one of his
sonnets entitled ''Idea," where he addresses it in behalf
of the imaginary idol of his soul, in rhymes as spark-
ling as the ripples of the stream itself.
" Cleere Ankor, on whose silTer-ianded shore
My soale-Bhrin'd Saint, my faire Idea lies,
O blessed brooke, whose milke-white swans adore
That chrystall streame refined by her eyes,
Where sweete myrrh-breatiiing Zephire, in the spring,
Gently distills his nectar-dropping showers,
Where nightingales in Arden sit and sing
Amongst the daintie dew-impearled flowers ;
Say thus, fidre Brooke, when thon shalt see thy Queene,
Loe heere thy Shepheard spent his wand'ring yeares ;
And in these shades, dear Nymph, he oft hath beene.
And heere to thee he sacrific'd his teares :
Faire Arden, thon my Tempo art alone.
And thou, sweet Ankor, art my Helicon."
In another of his poems, the ISth of the Polyolbion^
but in less pleasing strains, he celebrates the approaching
marriage of the two rivers at Tamworth.
NAME.
There is an inBurmoimtable difficulty in determining
the derivation of the name of Tamworth with any d^ree
of certainty or satis&ction. Owing to the obscurity in
which the origin of the town is inyolyed, it is not known
whether it was first built by the Saxons, or whether it
existed previously to their arrival in this country. It is
therefore impossible to ascertain if we should have recourse
to the British or the Saxon language.
However^ the first part of the name is clearly taken
from the river Tame. Lhwyd states that the British for a
stream in general was Taf or Tav, the final letter of which
was changed by the Romans into m, whence came the
names of several rivers in England, as the Thames, Thame,
Tamar, and Tame.^ But in supposing this alteration
might have been made to conform vrith the Greek for
a river, the first syllable being rejected, he certainly
advances an opinion removed firom any shadow of proba-
bility. It is as likely as that the English should alter
a Gaelic or other foreign term to suit some mutilated
French word for somewhat similar sound and expressive
of the same object. Dugdale deduces Tame firom the
gentle flovring of the water, as Arrow received its
designation from the swiftness of its course.'
1 Lbwyd's AdTerstfiA, labjoined to Baxter*! Gloiiuium.
S DofdAle's Wanrtckahire.
10 TAMWORTH
With respect to ** worth/' the termination of the names
of many other places in the kingdom besides this, a
very great difference exists. Though all authors are
unanimous in considering it to be Saxon^ they are nei-
ther agreed as to the exact word^ nor even as to the
meaning of the same term. Gibson* and Bailey* deduce
it from worth, a court or farm. Dugdale' derives it from
worthe, which he says is a mansion or dwelling place,
and Bigland/ a habitation or farm ; but Somner/ an entry,
porch, or court yard. Gibson also gives another word
worthig, which he calls a street or road; whilst Lye*
asserts that it is a small farm or field; and Lambarde,'
a close encompassing a mansion house, or the place of
the site of a manor. Morant' adopts worthige or worthe,
a way through a river, a mansion or dwelling house, a
farm or field, and in general a manor or estate. Another
word weorth, Camden* calls a river island, or place sur-
rounded by water ; Ingram,'^ a village or town near the
head of a river ; Thomas," a broad way, court, or place, to
which ige, an island, is affixed ; and Gibson, with Somner,
Gough," and Lye, a small farm. The latter also adopts
weorthig or wurthig, a small £Eurm or field; Bailey
again, weorthige, a street or field ; Manning," wurth, a
considerable mansion or farm. And finally the termi-
nation is said to come from waert, a water farm.*^
Amidst such contention in writers of high authority,
it would be impossible to decide the meaning of this
termination. But it is clear it cannot refer to the
circumstance that the places, of whose names it forms a
1 Gibson's Su. Chron. S Bailey's Enfl. diet. 3 DufttaOe's Warwickshire.
4 Bigland's Gloucestershire, ft Somner's Sax. diet. 0 Lye's Sax. diet.
1 Lambarde*s Diet, topogr. 8 Moraat's Essex. p Camden's Britannia.
10 Ingram's Sax. Chron. ll Thomas's Dugdale. is Oougfa's additioiis to Camden.
IS Mannhig's Surrey. 14 Levria's Topog. diet, of Engl.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 11
partj lie in the neighbourhood of a river^ for* many are
neither placed by any stream nor even in marshy land,
80 as to afford a probability to the suppositions of .those
who make the presence of water essential to their con-
jectures. Beyond this we can offer.no suggestion. It
must be left for those deeply versed in philological specu-
lation to determine whether ''worth" may signify a great
fiurm or a little farm^ a dwelling house^ a close encompass-
ing a mansion^ the site of a manor^ an estate, field, broad
way^ street, road, entry, court yard, or porch. .
An insuperable obstacle to the discovery of the etjrmon,
arises from the diversity of modes in which proper names
were, anciently written. This was owing to the absence
of fixed rules of orthography among our ancestors, . a
circumstance almost necessarily occurring before the mode
of speedily midtiplying and difiusing literary, works by
the art of printing, was discovered. These variations
have also been undoubtedly increased, in a very great
degree^ by the modification of the names themselves du-
ring the lapse of time. The Danish conquest, and more
especially that of the Normans from its permanence and
completeness, occasioned much confusion by the intro-
duction of a foreign pronunciation, which would naturally
lead to a change correspondingly great in the spelling.
Of the numerous and often singular manners in which
Tamworth has been written, we give the principal, adopt-
ing the list collected by Roby, but with several alterations
and additions. The dates refer to the ages of the docu-
ments that they are foxmd in.
In 781, Tamoworthie, Tamoworthige.* In 814, Tom-
oworthig, Tomoworthin." In 840, Tomeworthie.' In 841,
Tomanworthie, Tomanwordie, Tomeuuorthie, Tomeweor-
1 Offo*8 charters. 2 CoenwolfB charters. 3 Berhtwulfs charter.
12 TAMWORTH
thing J In 845^ Tomeuuorthig.* In 855, Tomanworthigne.*
In 857, Tomanuuorthig/ In the 10th century, Tama-
weorthige, Tameweorthige, Tamanweorthe, Tameweorthe,
Tameworththige, Tamewurthe, Tamanweorthige/ In the
same century, Tamewrthe.' In 1002, Tamwurthin.' In
1059, Tamawoidina.' In 1066, Tonwrrth, Tonwyrth.'
In 1086, Tamuuorde.''' In 1115, Tamwrda.'' In 1118,
Tomewordina, Tomwrfliigme, Tomweorthe.^ In 1148,
Tamewrthe." In 1150, Thamewrthe.^ In 1164, Tame-
weorde, Tomwirthig.'' In 1198, Tamuirting, Tamewrda,
Tamneting.^' In the same year, Tamesworthe.^' In 1S16,
Thamwrthe.'' In 1272, Tamewurthe.''' In 1284, Tamme-
worthe.*^ In 1291, Thomwurth, Thamwurth.'^ In 1S08,
Tammorth, Tammorthe." In 1857, Thomewurth, Tha-
niwurth." In 1859, Tamworht.** In 1877, Thameworth.*
In 1418, Tunneworth, Tanwith • In 1427, Tampworth.''
In 1491, Tomworth." In 1588, Thomworth." In 1548,
Tomwoorth." And in 1560, Tameworth,"
Among the records of the town, we first find the name
spelt in the mode adopted at the present time in 1804.
Previously it was written Thamworth or Thameworth,
and occasionally Tameworth.
1 BerhtwnlTfl charters. s lb. s Burgred*!! charten. 4 lb. 5 Sax. Chroo.
6 Chron. of Melrote. 7 Will of Walfric Spott. 8 Mariaaaa, quoted by
Camden and Shaw. 9 Coins of Edw. Confess. 10 Doomsday book.
11 M.S. quoted by Dufdale. la Florence of Worcester's Chronioon ex Chronids.
13 Henry of Hnndnicdon's Hlstorta. U Salzed's Oenealogla Ref . An^ I.
15 Simeon of Durham's De irestis Re^. An^. l6 Roger Hoveden*s Annates.
17 John Brompton's Chronicon. 18 Hofh White of Peterboroach's Historia.
19 Robert of Gloucester's Metrical Chronicle. 20 Tamworth Court rolls, IS E. I.
SI Taxation of P. Nicholas IV. sa Tamworth Court rolls, 31 E. I.
S3 Ralph Higden's Folychronicon. 24 WIgglnton Court rolls, SS B. III.
25 Matthew of Wcstmister's Flores Historiarum.
20 Tho. Rndbomo's Historia Ecclesin Wintonienals. 27 Tamworth Court rolls, 5 H.V.
28 John Rouse's Historia Rev. Angl. 99 Polydore Vergil's Angl. Historia.
SO HaU'B Vnion of the fameUes of Lancastre and Yorke. 91 Elizabeth's charter.
GENERAL HISTORY.
The origin of Tamworth is involved in the deep
obscurity, thrown like a veil by the hand of time over
the early history of our nation. Whether it formed one
of the towns of the primitive inhabitants of Britain, is
a question that can only be answered by conjectures of
its great probability. These places in the central parts
of the kingdom, inhabited, according to Ptolemy, by a
tribe called Cornabii or Comavii, were not composed of
a collection of huts as on the sea coast, where the
people were much more advanced in civilization firom
their intercourse with foreign nations. On the contrary,
they were merely fortifications, consisting of a tract of
densely wooded land surrounded by a bank and a ditch.'
Into these the people were accustomed to retire when
severely pressed by their enemies, and desirous of de-
fending themselves firom their attacks. In similar places
too, the Britons were accustomed to celebrate the mysteries
of their religion and erect altars, on which they im-
molated victims and paid a bloody homage to their gods.
In Britain, there were numerous forests where the
inhabitants chiefly dwelt. One of the largest and most
celebrated of these was that of Arden, the name of
which appears to have been the Celtic for a forest in
general fixxm the occurrence of the word to designate
1 Omar, dc Bello Oi^Uco, Ub. iv.
14 TAMWORTH
similar places in the north of France. It was bounded
by the banks of the rivers Avon, Trent, and Severn, and
by a line drawn firom Burton-on-Trent to the ancient
Roman station Bennones, the modem High Cross, where
the Watling street and the Foss way intersect each other.^
In the midst of this woodland, Tamworth or its site lay ;
its deep seclusion, its position by two streams, and the
productiveness of the soil, rendering it a likely spot to
be selected by. our rude forefathers for the erection of
a fortification and a place of refuge in necessity.
When the Romans had completely subdued this country,
they divided it into five provinces, Britannia prima,
Britannia secunda, Flavia Ciesariensis, Maxima Caesari-
ensis, and Valentia.' In the third of these, extending
from the Thames to the Humber, Tamworth was placed
supposing it then existed, a fact of which we have no
direct proof. The town, however, lies scarcely more than
a mile north of one of the Roman roads, the most re-
markable of them, not only on account of its length,
but also from the branches connected with it being more
numerous than those of any other.' The Watling street
passes through the borough in its course between the
ancient stations Manduessedum and Etocetum, the present
villages of Mancetter and Wall. Another Roman road
also ran directly through the town. "Wendley-way,"
says Shaw, "comes from the West end of Tamworth
church, nms on the West side of Drayton Basset park,
&c. The other way, it might have proceeded by Ashby
and Nottingham to Southwell."*
To the statements of this learned antiquary, we are
compelled, rather in a bold manner, to offer some ob-
1 Brewer*8 Beauties of England and Wales. 9 Richard of Cirencester.
S Reynold's Iter Brltannlarum. « Shaw's Staifordsbire.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 15
jections. It seems very doubtful whether Wendley way
came from Drayton Basset into the Watling street at
Fazeley, as none of the characteristics are founds by
which such works of the Romans are usually known.
For a similar reason, the continuance of the road between
Tamworth and Ashby may be considered as extremely
questionable and even improbable. Yet that a Roman
way ran from Fazeley to Tamworth westward of the
Church, we cannot dispute. It must have continued
along Salter street in this town, through Wigginton, by
Portway house, and through Harleston to Edengale. At
the latter village, Plott actually mentions the occur-
rence of a Roman road ;' and the whole way from
Wigginton presents all the signs of such structures in
general. The occurrence of Roman remains at Wigginton
and other places in the neighbourhood of the line, con-
firms the opinion we have given. At Wigginton there
was a large tumulus, now entirely carried away by the
plough, and a similar one is found at a little distance
from it, near Elford. The latter was opened by Plott
in October, 1680, who, from the ashes and charcoal with
several pieces of bone that he foimd in it, concluded at
once that it was Roman. Shaw seems rather to consider
the tumuli as those of Saxons slain in flight from the.
battle at Seckington ; but, as Plott truly observes, these
people never adopted the mode of burning the bodies of
the dead, at all event after their arrival in this country.
After maintaining their conquests in this island for
nearly 400 years, the Romans abandoned them about the
middle of the 5th century. Finding themselves unable
to resist the incursions of their enemies, the Britons were
at length compelled to call in the aid of the Saxons, a ^
1 Ftott's Nitond HiMonr oT Staflbrdshire.
16 TAMWOBTH
numerous and warlike race from the north of Europe.
But after these people had successfully rendered their
aid, treacherously turning round, they directed their arms
against the Britons, and obtained almost daily fresh
mastery over them. King Arthur, for a time, according
to tradition, checked their career; but, when he passed
away, they gained the field again.
The Saxons, as they subjugated the country, established
eight kingdoms, Kent, Sussex, Wessex, East Anglia, Essex,
Bemicia, Deira, and Merda. The subsequent union of
Bemicia and Deira, reduced the octarchy into an hep-
tarchy. Mercia was the last kingdom formed, being
founded in the year 585. It embraced the midland
counties of England ; but varied in size at different times,
according to the success of arms, when the Saxons having
few to contend with, began to make war upon each other.^
From the time of the first Mercian king Creoda to
the reign of Offii, Tamworth is not mentioned, though
it probably formed the residence of some of the earlier
kings, even before the introduction of Christianity. Ead-
vald or Ethelbald, who ascended the throne in 716, and
held it for nearly forty years, was at last himself slain
and his followers defeated, at Seccandune or Seckington,
in a batde caused by the insurrection of his ovm army,
headed by Beomred, one of the generaki. This ambitious
warrior seized the government ; but he was compelled to
fly from the country before the close of the first year of
his usurpation, 755. He was overcome in fight by Offii,
either grand nephew or second cousin of Eadvald, a
young but valiant man> who was then elevated to the
throne, as eleventh king of Mercia, by the unanimous
coi^sent of the nobles of the land.'
1 Turoer*! Hlitoiy of the Anfflo Suont. s Sftz. Chron.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 17
Soon after his accession to the crown^ Offa came to
Tamworth, where he caused a palace to be built of greater
dimensions than was usual in those times. This, for its
magnificence, was the admiration and wonder of the age.*
He also then strongly fortified the town by surrounding
it with a vast entrenchment and bank, the traces of
which remain at the present day, and still retain the
name of Offa's dyke, or the King's ditch. Thus Tam-
worth was either rendered for the first time a r^al
dwelling place, or as such received improvements which
exigencies might require, or the bounty of royalty dictate.
That it was previously honoured with the presence of
kings, seems very likely from the proximity of the field
of battle where Eadvald fell, Seckington being a small
village about four miles distant. The town, however,
became one of very great celebrity, and continued to be
the fiivourite resort of Offa and of many of his successors,
at least during the solemn festivals of Christmas and
Easter. From hence they dated numerous charters to
bishops and religious bodies of the realms.
With very rare exceptions, the ecclesiastical charters
of this period have alone survived to our time. For
when William the Conqueror seized the possessions of
the Saxons and divided them among his followers, all
previous grants which could not be shown to belong to
religious foundations were rendered useless. The instru-
ments by which they were made were probably in part
lost, and in part destroyed by the Normans, in order to
prevent the possibility of their being afterwards disturbed
in the fair domains they had acquired. The charters
ought generally to be regarded rather as deeds of sale
or exchange than as donations; for it is evident, in
1 F. Palgn^e-
D
18 T AM WORTH
the majority of cases, the full value of the lands and
privileges was given in money or otherwise by the
parties to whom the gifts were made. Much doubt
has been cast upon the validity of these celebrated
documents, some authors seeming inclined to reject
them altogether as forgeries that claims might be ex-
hibited, which could not otherwise be substantiated. But
this opinion is not based upon any rational authority, or
is there any historical evidence to support it. The
inaccuracies found in the copies of them made by annalists
and others, seem to be entirely the result of inadvertence
or carelessness in the transcription. Many of these faults
have been detected. For instance, Hickes gives two
charters of Athelstan, which he designates ^'egregious
examples of fraud and imposture,*'* bearing the date
670, a most glaring anachronism ; and a third charter of
the same king, in the same year, contains a similar
error.
But on the discovery of the original autograph or du-
plicate of the last document in the archives of the dean
and chapter of Canterbury, the true date, 987, was appar-
ent, rendering it probable that Hickes' " egregious ex-
amples" owed their chief suspicious character to the
faultiness of the the Normanno-Saxon copies he evidently
used. Again, many have been condemned on account of
the misapprehension of our historians on some point.
The recent discovery of the distinction between Ethelgar,
bishop of Selsey, afterwards archbishop of Canterbury,
and a bishop of Crediton bearing the same name, has
restored to honor and respectability more than twenty
of these venerable records. In the same manner, it is
reasonable to suppose that the weakened suspicion still
1 Hickes* DtsserUtIo epistolaris.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 19
hanging over some others may be cleared away by
future investigations.'
Of the charters granted by Offa two only remain that
bear date at Tamworth.
In 781, with the consent of his prelates and nobles,
be confirmed to bishop Hathored and to the church
of St. Peter at Worcester certain lands in Homtune
and Fcehhaleage, exempting them for ever from all tax-
ation. The charter was dated by the king on the
second day of the nativity of our Lord, or the feast of
the blessed Stephen (the 26th of Dec), " in sede regali
sedens in Tamoworthie;" and was subscribed by Cyne-
thryth, queen ; Eadberht, Hygeberht, Hathored, bishops ;
Brondan, Berhtwald, Eadbald, generals.'
At the same time, by another charter, Offa gave to
the church of St. Mary at Worcester, lands at Icancumbe,
exempt from royal tribute, &c., in exchange for other
lands at Sapian. He subscribed himself " gratia Dei
donante Rex Anglorum, sedens in regali palatio Tamo-
worthie," written in another copy Tamoworthige. The
following then added their consent : Cynethryd, queen ;
Eabberht, Hygeberht, Hathored, bishops; Brordan, Berht-
wald, Eadbald, generals; Eadher, duke.'
Offa was a wise and able king, an experienced and
intrepid warrior, and a great patron of learning. He
extended his kingdom on every side, too often, indeed,
by treachery and crime. When he came to the throne,
Mercia included the counties of Stafford, Warwick,
Worcester, Leicester, Hereford, Buckingham, Bedford,
Rutland, Northampton, Huntingdon, Lincoln, Derby,
Chester, and the largest proportions of Middlesex, Hert-
ford, and Salop. To these he added by conquest
1 Cod. diplom. eevi Sazonici. Chart. Aogloaax. 2 Hcmingi Chartularium. 3 lb.
iO TAMWORTH
Notdnghaniy wrested from Northumhria/ and Oxford
and Gloucester, from Wessex.' The remaining part of
Shropshire, with portions of Denbigh, Flint, Radnor,
and Montgomery, he took from Wales.' Norfolk, Suffolk,
and Cambridge were gained by the murder of Ethelberht,
the East Anglian king, at a feast held during the cele-
bration of that young prince's marriage with his third
daughter, in 792, when he was dispatched by a hired
assassin of the name of Ouimberht/ Ofia also subjugated
Kent ; but he allowed its sovereign to retain a tributary
crown.* He died on the 10th of August, 794, after a
reign of 39 years, and was succeeded by his only son
Ecgfryth, whom he had previously associated with himself
in the government of his kingdom.*
But all the endeavours of Offa were unable to secure
the throne to his son. There was one enemy whose
attacks no penetration could foresee or any policy pre-
vent. The hand of death disappointed the hopes that
he had formed, for Ecgfryth survived only 141 days.
His death was generally considered as a judgment for
his father's crimes. Such was the opinion of the
learned Alcuin at the time.^ Truly the malediction of
heaven seems to have rested on the family. Of the three
daughters, the eldest Eadburga became in&mous for her
licentiousness and cruelty. Her husband Beorhtric, king
of Wessex, being poisoned by the wine she intended for
another, she fled to France for reAige. Charlemagne, on
account of the friendship he had entertained for her
father, placed her in a convent. But scarcely had the
vows of chastity passed her lips than they were broken,
and disgraced, she was expelled from the sacred walls.
1 John Brompton. 2 Sax. Chron. 3 Turner's Anglo Saxonv. 4 Will. Malmsb.
5 Sax. Chron. 6 lb. 7 Letter in Leland's Collectanea.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 21
and terminated her career at Pa via, a houseless mendi-
canty still guilty as before.^ Elfleda, the second daughter,
became an outcast when her husband Ethelred, king of
Northumbria, was slain in an insurrection of his own
subjects^ a fate his tyranny brought upon him.' .The
youngest daughter. Etheldritha, who had been the un-
conscious means of luring the East Anglian king to his
doom, was perhaps the most fortunate of aU, at least if
we look beyond .the range of time. She took the veil
at Croyland in Lincolnshire, and there passed her life in
peace, living, however, to see the down£Edl of her father's
kingdom and its subjection to Wessex.' Thus futile is
the end of crime.
After the decease of Ecgfiyth, Coenwulf ascended the
throne as the thirteenth king of Mercia. His connexion
with the family of Ofia was very distant, both tracing
their ancestry to Wybba, under whose fitther Creoda
the kingdom was established.*
Coenwulf was one of the sovereigns who resided at
Tamworth, as two of his charters bear record.
In the first of these, with the advice and consent of
his nobles, he exchanged certain lands with his faithful
and venerable bishop Deneberht and the church of
Worcester, for the monastery of Bitumeum and land on
the western bank of the Severn. The charter, dated
''anno ncccxiiii, in vico celeberrimo qui vocatur Tomo-
worthig, die vii kl. Januarii" (the 26th of Dec.),
concluded with the invocation of a blessing on any one
securing or increasing the gift, and a denunciation of
separation from God and the saints, against any destroy-
ing or diminiflhiTig it. It was signed by Coenwlf, king
1 Sim. of Durham. 8 lb. s John Brompton.
4 Matth. of Wentm.
%X TAM WORTH
of the Mercians ; Wulfredy archbishop ; ^Ifthryth, queen
Ealdulfy Werenberhty Deneberht, Wlfheard, bishops
Heardberht, Beomoth, Dywna, Ceolberht, Mucel, dukes
Ceolwulf.'
In that year also, another charter was given by the
king to the same bishop and churchy conferring on them
certain lands in Sture or Stowre, free from aU taxes,
except those particularly specified, and to be enjoyed as
long as Christianity should remain in the repon. It
was dated ^4n vico oeleberrimo qui vocatur Tomoworthin";
and, after invoking increase of life and property on the
preservers and augmenters, and threatening infringers
with the wrath of Grod, was subscribed by Cenulf, king
of the Mercians ; ^Ifthryth, queen ; Aldulf, Werenberht,
Deneberht, bishops ; Heardberht, Beomoth, dukes ; Ead-
gar, Wigberht, priests ; Sigreth, Eadwulf, ministers.*
The reign of Coenwulf was one of continued success ;
and he maintained his kingdom in the predominant
position, to which it had been elevated by Offa. He
was engaged, perhaps, in fewer battles than the generality
of Anglo-Saxon monarchs, and never but once assumed
the position of an aggressor. The principal scenes of his
warfare were Kent and Wales. On his first accession
to the throne, being young and ardent, he appears to
have yielded, for a time, to motives of ambition. He
then entered Kent with a large army, and, deposing the
sovereign, placed his brother Cuthberht on the throne.'
But afterwards he seems to have resigned his desires of
acquiring new territories and devoted all his energies
to secure the prosperity and happiness of his people.
When Eardulf, the Northumbrian king, prepared, in 801,
to invade Mercia, he was speedily in arms to repel the
1 Heiningi Chartularium. 2 lb. 3 Will, of Malmsbory.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 23
enemy. But the prelates, with some nohles of each na-
tion, having assembled in a council, exerted all their
endeavours to prevent the occurrence of war, and Eardulf
was persuaded to give up his intentions. A treaty of
peace was then proposed into which both kings gladly
entered, and afterwards kept with the greatest fidelity.'
The attack made by Coenwulf, a short time previously
to his death, upon the kingdom of Powys in Wales,
seems to have been caused by an incursion of the Welsh
into the Mercian frontier."
Coenwulf, of whom all the ancient annalists speak in
the highest terms as a just and pious king, closed his
happy reign in 819.' John Brompton says that he was
. slain in a sudden insurrection of the East Anglians,
whose domains Offa had retained. All other historians
are silent as to the cause of his decease, whilst Henry
of Huntingdon expressly asserts that he died a natural
death. This opinion seems by far the most probable,
as the East Anglians did not throw off the Mercian yoke
till six years subsequently.
Tamworth is not mentioned again for some time.
Merda, indeed, became, during the space of nineteen
years, a continued scene of intestine commotion, fell
with great rapidity, and at last became a tributary
kingdom.
Kenelm succeeded his father Coenwulf when he was-
only seven years old. But, in the course of a few months^
he was murdered at the instigation of his elder sister
Quendred, who, dead to the gentle voice of affection,
removed him in hopes of placing a lover on the throne,
and of sharing the regal honours herself. Being enticed
into a forest under a plea of hunting, the infapt king
1 Sim. of Durham. s Lloyd's Hist, of Wales. » Sax. Chron.
M TAMWORTH
was assassinated near Clent in Stafibrdshire, by a man
named Ascebert, who concealed his body in a well
oveigrown with briarsJ
This tragical event has afforded the subject of one
of Shenstone's elegies.
** Born near the scene for Kmdm's fate renown *d,
I take my plaintive reed, and range the grove,
And raiae my lay, and bid the rocka resound
The savage force of empire and of love.
Fast by the centre of yon various wild,
Where spreading oaks embower a Gothic fane,
Kendrida*s arts a brother's youth beguil'd ;
There Nature uig'd her tend'rest pleas in vain.
Soft o'er his birth, and o'er his infant hours,
Th' ambitious maid could every care employ ;
llien, with assiduous fondness, cropt the tlowVs,
To deck the cradle of the princely boy.
But soon the bosom's pleasing calm is flown ;
Love fires her breast, the sultry passions rise ;
A (avour'd lover seeks the Mercian throne,
And views her Kenelm with a rival's eyes.
How kind were Fortune 1 ah, how just were Fate !
Would Fate or Fortune Merda's heir remove,
How sweet to revel on the conch of state.
To crown at once her lover and her love !
See, gamish'd for the chase, the fraudfnl maid
To these lone lulls direct her devious way ;
The youth, all prone, the sister-guide obeyed ;
Ill-fated youth, himself the destined prey.'
For a considerable time, the &te of Kenelm was un-
known; but it was at last discovered^ according to the
old story, by a scroll being found on the high altar of
St. Peter's at Rome, dropped, it is said, by a dove.*
1 wm. of Malmsbury. a SSTdBegy. 3 WUl. of Malmsbury.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 25
It bore a Saxon couplet thus rendered in Latin : —
'* In Clenty rab spina, jacet in convalle bovina
Vertioe priTatiu Kenelniiis nge creatu."
This may be translated into English in the following
manner : —
In a lonely Tale at Clent, where oxen range the field,
Headless royal Kenelm lies, beneath a thorn conoeal'd.
After the discoyery of the body, a church was built near
the well^ and both^ remaining at this time, retain the
name of St. Kenelm's.
The hopes of the fratricide Quendrid were justly dis-
appointed ; for her uncle immediately ascended the throne
under the name of Ceolwulf I.*
This king had hardly reigned for more than a year,
when he was driven out in a revolt among his subjects,
and Beomwulf, an officer, usurped the government.*
BeomwulTs short sway was marked by little else than
misfortune. He was completely defeated by Ecgberht the
Great, in a battle fought at EUandun or Wilton, in the
third year of his reign. Soon afterwards, being compel-
led to hasten into East Anglia to suppress an insurrection
of the people, who sought to free themselves from the
thraldom of Mercia, he was there slain in 825. Upon
this, the East Anglians joined Ecgbert and surrendered
themselves completely to him.'
Ludican, in attempting to regain the lost province
and to avenge the death of his predecessor, was sud-
denly attacked unawares and put to death with five of
Ids chief men or councillors.*
Withlaff, the next in succession, after a short en-
deavour to turn the tide of fortune, was overcome by
the powerftil king of Wessex, and Mercia subjugated.
I Flor.oCWorcMter. s Matfh. of Westminster. 3 lb. 4 WUl. of Mslnubury.
E
Xfo TAMWORTH
From the battle field he fled to Croyland^ and sought
sanctuary in the abbey. He was consigned for safety
to the cell that Etheldritha usuaUy held^ who was thus
doomed^ before death should close her eyes, not only to
witness the extinction of her family, but the downfidl
of the kingdom itself, which had cost her father such
labour to exalt, and so much crime to render secure.
The abbot of Croyland afterwards took upon himself
the office of mediator between the royal fugitive and
Ecgberht. He hastened to the court, and his entreaties
and persuasions so far prevailed that Withlaff was re-
stored to his crown, on condition that he should pay an
annual tribute to Wessex as an acknowledgment of its
superior sovereignty.* The terms seem to have been so
mild, that the Mercians never attempted to throw off
the easy yoke.
On the decease of Withlaff in 838, Berhtwulf suc-
ceeded,' in whose time Tamworth is mentioned in seven
charters as a royal residence.
The first of these was superscribed, " Alto et agio et
omnipotentissimo deo nostro, ac sanctae et gloriosae
Trinitati, uirtus, honor, et potestas sit in perpetuum.
Amen." Dated on the 28th of March, 840, it recites
that Berhtuulf, instigated by enemies, had taken away
and given to others lands, called Stoltun, Uassanbuma,
Cyneburgingctun, Tateringctun, Codesuuelle, which had
been previously granted to the episcopal see of Worcester,
that is, to the church there. Upon this, bishop Heaberht,
with his elders, proceeded at Easter, " ad Tomeworthie,**
and produced his charters before the court, when the
nobles of the realm decided that he had been unjustly
despoiled. But it seems the bishop paid highly for the
1 Matth. orwestminiter. 2 lb.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 27
restoration of his rights. He gave to the king four
well-chosen war horses, a ring of the value of thirty
mancuses/ a wrought dish of three pounds, and ^^ duas
albas comas" of four pounds. To the queen, he gave
two good horses, two stirrups of two pounds, and a
golden cup of two pounds. After a denunciation against
any king, prince, or man of other grade, who, deceived
by diabolical avarice, should in future violate the gift,
Berhtuulf signed his consent as king of the Mercians.
Then followed the names of Saethryth, queen; Cylieferth,
Heaberht, Berehtred, Cuthuulf, bishops; Eanmund,
abbot; Hunberht, Mucel, Cyneberht, Aetheluulf, dukes;
Eaduulf, Wicga, Eaduulf ; Aethelheard, Dudda, Sigered,
Mucel, dukes; Aelfred, Hwithyse, Aldberht.'
By the second charter, Berhtwulf granted to the
venerable bishop Heaberht, for a ring of the value of
thirty-one mancuses, land at a place called by rustics
Huiocewudu, in perpetual freedom. The grant was
written '' in loco qui dicitur Croppanthom, et iterum, in
natali domini, aet Tomanuuorthie (in another copy,
Tomanwordie'), anno domini dcccxli, regis praefati iii."
The following subscribed: — ^Berhtuulf, king of the
Mercians; Saethryth, queen; Cyneferth, Heaberht, Cuth-
uulf, bishops; XJuihtred, Eanmund, Ceorred, abbots;
Mucel, Hunberht, Sigered, dukes/
The third charter commenced with a quotation from
the writings of St. Paul on the flight of time,' and
again from those of a sage sophist, who, in a catalectic
verse, sang saying, ''Non semper licet gaudere: Fugit
hora qua iacemiu:." It then proceeded to grant to the
venerable abbot Eanmund, and his fraternity at Breo-
1 A maocuM wu of the valne of thirty Saxon pennies.
3 Codes diplom. aevi Saxonid. Chart. Angloeax. 3 Hcming:! Chartolailum.
4 Codex dipkun. aeri Saxon. Chart. Anglomx. 6 1 Cor. caprii. ver.Si.
28 TAMWORTH
dune, in perpetual alms, the freedom of their monastery
from those called in the Saxon language festingmen, so
long as the Catholic faith and the baptism of Christ
should be preserved in Britain. For this immunity, the
abbot and his holy congregation had given, ^^in famoso
uico in Tomeuuorthie," a large silver dish, exquisitely
wrought and of great value, and the sum of one hundred
and ninety mancuses in pure gold. They had also sung,
at twelve time, one hundred psalters, and one himdred
and twenty masses, for the king, his dear friends, and
all the Mercian nation. After the injunction in the
name of the Omnipotent, the nine orders of angels, and
all the elect of Christ, that the gift should remain in-
violate, the charter was dated ^'anno dominicae incar-
nationis dcccxli. Indictione iiii. in die natalis domini,
in celebri uico on Tomeuuorthie." It was signed by
Berhtuulf, king of the Mercians; Saethryth, queen;
Cyneferth, Aldred, Berehtred, Heaberht, Cuthuulf,
bishops; Eanmund, Uuihtred, Ceolred, abbots.*
The fourth charter, dated '^ Anno incamationis domini
nostri Ihesu Christi dccc^xli^ indictione iiii^ in die
natalis domini, in celebri uico Tomeuuorthie,*' conferred
upon bishop Heaberht a piece of land, occupied by one
house, in a town caUed by rustics Myttun, to be enjoyed
by the monks of St. Mary's at Worcester. After an
injunction similar to that in the last, the gift was con-
firmed by Berhtuulf, king of the Mercians; Saethryth,
queen; Heaberht, Kynefyrth, Berhtred, Cuthuulf, bishops;
Uuihtred, Eanmund, abbots; Ceolred, Aethelheard, Hun-
berht, Aetheluulf, dukes; Eaduulf, Aelfred, Uuicga,
Eadberht, ministers.'
Berhtwulf, in his fifth charter, which was not dated,
1 Codex diplom. Kvl Suconid. Chut. AnfloMX. i lb.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 29
but is assigned to the year 841, granted to his minister
Ecberhty for sixty pounds in pure gold and silver, cer-
tain lands, free from all services great and small. The
preservers of the gift were then consigned to the keep^
ing of the Holy Trinity, here and in heaven, and eternal
malediction was invoked on those who should infringe
it, unless they diould make worthy amendment to Grod
and man. ^^ £t hii testes aderant, qui hoc consenserunt,
et cum signo sanctae crucis Christi firmauenmt^ in
famoeo loco qui dicitur Tomeweorthing quorum hie
nomina notantur." Berhtwulf, king of the Mercians;
Saethryth, queen; Tunberht, Ceolred, Cuthwulf, bishops;
Hunberht, Aldberht, ^thelheard, dukes.'
By the sixth charter, the king, on payment of three
pounds of silver, gave to Bishop Heaberht the perpetual
freedom of land called Daeglesford. It was signed,
" in loco qui dicitiu: Tomanworthie, anno dominicae
incamationis. dcgcxli. indictione in.," by Berhtuulf, king
of the Mercians; Saethryth, queen; Cyneferth, Heaberht,
Berehtred, bishops; XJuihtred, Eanmund, Ceorred, abbots;
Mucel, Humberht, Cyneberht, Dudda, dukes.'
By the seventh and last charter, Berhtuulf, first
calling to mind the transitory nature of earthly things,
compared with the unfailing joys of heaven, and re-
membering the invitation of Jesus Christ, ^^Come to
me all Fyou that labom: and are burdened, and I will
refresh you," granted, for the succour of his soul, to
his venerable bishop Heabert, and the clergy at Wor-
] Tlie senersl mode of signing tbe Anglo-Saxon charten was for each person
to fonn a cross before his name. This, as a sliort declaration of faith, was the most
solemn ratification of a deed, short of an actual oath, that could be mode. Even now
tlie cnstom is not completely lost, for those to whom the art of writing is stUl un-
known usually substitute a cross for their names, not, however, attaching to it a
reiigioQs meaning, but to hare afflxed over it the somewhat reproachful title of
" their mark.**
S Codex diplom. Kvi Saxon. Chart. Anglosax. 3 lb.
80 TAMWOBTH
cester^ the freedom from all services of the monastery
by Eafene, called XJfera Stretford. For this, the bishop
paid ten pounds in silver. The exemption was "ab
omni iugo humanae seniitutiB, ab omnibus saecularibus
tributis et uectigalibus ; cum cunctis utilitatibus ad illam
aecclesiam recte pertinentibus, campis uel siluiunculis,
pascuis uel pratis, fluminibus uel piscationibus ; ab opere
regali^ et pastu regis et prindpis, uel iuniorum eorum;
ab hospitorum refectione uel uenatorum ; etiam equorum
regis, falconum, et ancipitruum, et puerorum qui ducunt
canes. Quid plura ? ab omni tribulatione noti et ignoti,
magni et modici, libera consistit in aeuum, quamdiu
fides Christianae religionis apud Anglos in Brittannia
insula permaneat." After the customary invocation of
a blessing and a curse, the gift was dated "anno
domini incamationis dccc^^xlv^ Indictione vni^ in
loco regali qui dicitur Tomeuuorthig, in natiuitate do-
mini." It was signed by Berhtuulf, king of the
Mercians ; Saethryth, queen ; Hunberht, Heaberht, Cior-
redy Berhtred, Cuthuulf, Uuihtred, bishops; Eanmund,
abbot; Aetheluulf, priest; Berhtric, son of the king;
Mucel, Humberht, Aelfstan, Cyneberht, Aetheluulf,
Mucel, Sigered, Dudda, Aldberht, dukes; Aelfred, Uuicga,
Aethelheah, Eadgar, Uuiglaf, Eaduulf, Uulfred.*
The commencement of Berhtwulfs reign was marked
by irruptions of the Welsh into Merda, in which they
were generally successful. At length, in 843, calling
in the aid of Ethelwulf, he completely routed them at
Kettal, where their king Mervjrn Vrych was slain.'
Berhtwulfs government was then peaceable for eight
years, till the Danes appeared, and his anny was
scattered by them. He died in 852, and Burgred suc-
1 Codex diplom. aevi Saxon. Chart. Anglo-sax. 2 Powell's Hist, of Walet.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 81
ceeded as the twentieth king of Mercia, and the last
recorded as being at Tamworth.
By charter, this sovereign granted to his faithful and
dear prelate and friend Alhwin the freedom of the
monastery called Bloccanleeh from the keeping of all
hawks and Mcons in the Mercian land, and of all
hunters of the king and prince, except those in the
province of the Hwicdi, and from some other services.
The bishop paid three hundred shillings for this exemp-
tion, which, dated in 855, " in uico celebre, q : a multis
uocitatur tomanworthigne," was subscribed by Burhred,
king of the Mercians ; Aethelswyth, queen ; Tumberht,
Ceorred, Berehtred, Alhiwine, Cuthuulf, bishops ; Hum-
briht, Aethelheard, Beomnoth, Aldberhti, Weremberhti,
Mucel, dukes.'
In another charter, Burgred, with the consent of his
councillors, granted to his bishop Alhun, for sixty
shillings of silver, a small portion of the liberty of the
grazing land in Lundonia, where it was called Ceolmun-
dingcharga, which was not far from Uuestgetum, with
all privileges. After the customary benediction on pre-
servers of the grant, and anathema on all infractors,
unless they should make amends to God and man, the
gift was dated ^'anno dominici incamatione dccclvii.
Indictione uero v. in loco fiunosa, qui dicitur Toman*
uuorthig, in sancta pascha domini" (the 18th of April).
It was agreed to by the following : — ^Burgred, king of the
Mercians ; Aethelswyth, queen ; Tumberht, Ceored,
Alhun, Byrhtred, Cuthuulf, bishops; Hunberht, Beorht-
noth, Ealdberht, Mucel, Athulf, Beomhard, Eadred,
dukes.'
After the defeat of the Welsh, who, under the celebra-
1 Codes diploiii. KTi Saxon. Chart. AoflosAX. s lb.
32 TAMWORTH
ted Bodri-mawr, or Koderick the Greats attached Mercia
in 853/ Burgred maintained his kingdom in profound
peace for fourteen years. But it then hastened to its
fall even as a tributary monarchy, becoming a prey to
the Danes.
These northern adventurers first came into Britain
•'from the land of robbers" in 787, when a band of
them in three ships made their appearance off the coast
of Wessex, where they landed for the purpose of spolia-
tion. After slaying one of the king's officers, with his
attendants, who, taking them for merchants, and un-
suspicious of treachery, went to learn whence they came,
they re-embarked." In 793, they made an incursion into
Northumbria, murdered many of the inhabitants, regard-
less of age or sex, and, plundering the famous monastery
of Lindes&me or Holy Island, slew most of the monks
there or carried them away, probably to suffer a more
lingering and cruel death.' But, for nearly forty years,
they were deterred from repeating their predatory visits,
in consequence of a severe disaster that befel them in
the following year. They came in a large fleet to
Northumbria, and ravaged the whole country, pillaging
the convent of Tynemouth, and many other places.
Offa sent aid to Ethelred, his son-in-law, the king,
and the sea-robbers were compelled to fly before the
Mercian troops to their ships, leaving behind them the
spoil taken from St. Cuthbert's monastery. Just as they
were setting sail, a very sudden and heavy storm came
on, in which most of their ships were lost, and numbers
of their warriors drowned. Several of the vessels were
drifted on shore, and the pirates in them, being taken
prisoners, were beheaded immediately on the sands by
1 Sax. Chron., Hen. of HuntliiKdon. s Sax. Chron. t lb.
CASTLS AND TOWN. 3S
the country-people^ who were infuriated at the loss of
property they had sustained^ and whose ears still rang
with the piercing shrieks of females^ and the cries of
in&nts, the blood of whom now stained their once
happy hearths.^
In 833, these ferocious rovers again appeared in
Britain and sacked the isle of Shepey. In the ensuing
year, they came in thirty-five ships to Charmouth, in
Dorsetshire, where a long encoimter took place between
them and the Saxons, without any decided advantage
being gained on either side.' Their incursions now be-
came frequent and continued with a harassing perti-
nacity which no defeats could subdue. Not satisfied with
confining themselves to the coasts, they passed boldly
into the interior, under the command of great and ex-
perienced leaders, and obtained easy conquests in the
nation weakened by civil strife and divided by disaffec-
tion. In 851, they entered the Thames, with a fleet of
three-hundred and fifty ships, and plundered the cities
of Canterbury and London. They were encountered by
Berhtwulf, king of Mercia; but his army soon fled in
dismay before the enemy at Bensington. Afterwards
they were attacked at Oakley, in Surrey, by the forces
of Wessex, under Athelwulf and Ethelbald ; who, after
a most severe and protracted conflict, were left the
conquerors in the bloody strife."
In 866, a large body of Danes landed among the
East-AngUans; who, terrified at the sight of the barba-
rians and desirous of preserving themselves, entered
into a treaty with them. In the following spring, well
provided with horse and arms, and joined by consider-
1 Sue. Chnm., Hen. of Hontiiigdon. a lb.
9 SUE« Chitm., Hen. of Hantingdon.
84 TAMWORTH
able numbers from the north abnost daily, they marched
into Northumbria, and seized York. Osbriht and Ella,
two competitors for the crown, on the appearance of the
common foe, prudently waived their own claims to unite
for the preservation of their country. But they both fell
in the attempt to retake the dty.^
In the next year, 868, the Danes, having permanently
established themselves in the north, marched into Merda,
under the command of two brothers, Ivar or Inguar
and Ubba, and took the town of Nottingham. Buigred
called in the aid of Ethelred, king of Wessex, and his
younger brother Alfred, and beset the town. But the
Danes refused to risk an engagement in the open fields:
so that, wearied out by the protracted siege and unable
to maintain his large army, Burgred was compelled to
make a treaty with his foes; and they were permitted
retrace their steps unmolested into Northumbria.'
They soon began their devastating career again. In
869, they passed through Mercia into East-Anglia,
plundering the whole country in their march, slaughter-
ing numerous religious bodies and destroying the convents
and churches. The monasteries of Bardney, Croyland,
Peterborough, Ely, and Huntingdon, were levelled com-
pletely to the ground. The East-Anglians hoped that
they should have escaped, on accoimt of their former
treaty; but they soon discovered their fatal error. After
a short and ineffectual stru^le, Eadmimd the king was
taken prisoner at Henglesdon, the present Hoxon.
Having stedfastly refused to redeem his life by the
renunciation of Christianity, he was first beaten with
staves and afterwards boimd naked to a tree and
scourged. He was then made a mark for the arrows
1 Sax. Chron., Will, of Malmsborr. 9 lb.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 85
of his brutal victors; and at last his sufferings were
terminated by decapitation. His martyrdom took place
on the 20th of November, 870.*
The Danes, having subdued that country, passed into
Wessex, the sovereign of which, Ethelred, fell in opposing
them. Alfred, who succeeded his brother, being borne
down by his enemies and defeated at Wilton, entered
into a treaty, by which he agreed not to afford aid to
any other nation against them, if they would abandon
his territories.*
Accordingly they quitted Wessex, in 872, and re-
entered Mercia. Burgred, knowing his inability to expel
the foe, purchased their absence by numerous valuable
gifts; and they retired into Lincolnshire. Incited by the
ease with which they found that they could extort these
presents, they threatened, in the same year, another
invasion; and received a second bribe for the confirma-
tion of the last treaty. Again they poured into the
miserable country, in 874, and settled in winter-quarters
at Kepton, in Derbyshire; where they destroyed the
mausoleum of the Mercian kings. Burgred fled from
his coimtry, and sought refuge in Rome, where he
soon after died and was interred in the church of St.
Mary belonging to the English college. His wife, the
only sister of Alfred, who had accompanied her husband,
then became a nun in a convent at Pavia, where she
died in 888.* The Danes, now masters of Mercia, chose
a Saxon officer, a traitor to his country, to be king as
Ceolwulf II.; but, having excited their displeasure, he
was deposed in 877,* after a reign of three years. With
him, Mercia fell as a kingdom never to rise again; having
1 Sax. Cbron. WUL of Malms. 2 Matth. of Westm. 3 lb., Sax. Chron.
4 Will, of Malmsturjr. 5 Sax. Chron., Ingulf.
86 TAMWORTH
been established 292 years and ruled by twenty-one
sovereigns.
Britain thus became reduced to a most deplorable state
of ruin. Alfred, himself, was compelled for some time
to remain concealed in the depths of the forest. This was
the period of the scene> celebrated in history, between
the fugitive and disguised monarch and the herdsman's
wife. The Danes, meeting with but little opposition
and totally regardless of treaties, spread throughout the
land and destroyed the principal towns and fortresses.
Among these, Tamworth became the victim of their
atrocities; was completely razed to the ground and lay
a mass of blackened ruins for nearly forty years. The
annalists give dreadful accounts of the ravages of the
Danes ; and their narratives certainly have not been ex-
aggerated. Their marches were accompanied by fire and
slaughter, and famine followed in their trail. Men they
slew without mercy, or degraded into slaves. Females
shared the same unhappy fate, afiter having been subjected
to the grossest insults which the passions could inflict.
Infants too they did not spare; and it was frequently
their savage sport to catch them on the spear's point,
and after spinning them round aloft, to throw them on the
ground to linger out their last few moments of life in
agony.^ No part of the land was exempt from the visits
of the murderers. The Raven-standard reared itself on
every side. Wherever it flew, like the darkling bird
of superstition, it betokened woe and desolation, and
the fierce war-cry, which announced its presence, foreboded
too truly that death was at hand. Hope seemed to have
withdrawn her gladdening smile for ever. But she was
lingering with Alfred in concealment as her last resort.
1 Hist of the Northmen.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 87
She accompanied him in every movement; and^ sustain-
ing him imder every difficulty, drove away despair. She
led him, in the harper's guise, into the midst of the
enemies' camp to learn their secret schemes. She glided
smiling over his lowly couch of sleep and whispered
consolation in his ear. And sometimes, too, assimiing
the fierce tone of desperation, she ui^ed the Saxons to
the battle field and rallied them to the glorious struggle
for lijfe and liberty. Hope, though unseen, still hovered
round amidst the dreary scene.
At last. Providence relaxed His chastening hand, which
had lain so heavily on Britain because of her sins, and
turned the scale of fortune in her favour. In 880,
the magical banner of the Danes was struck down and
captured, and one of their greatest chieftains killed, by
Oddune, duke of Devonshire.' The loss of the celebrated
Beufen or Raven filled them with consternation and
dismay, and the Saxons with encouragement. Alfred,
emei^ing firom his hiding-place, led on his soldiers, and,
taking the enemy imawaies, cut the greater part of their
army to pieces. The commander Gothrun and many
others having been captured, an offer was made that, if
they would embrace Christianity and assist in prevent-
ing the incursions of other Danes, their lives should be
spared and land assigned them to hold in peace. These
conditions were gladly accepted; and the Danes, ex-
changing the dark Raven-standard for the effulgent
banner of the Cross, were established in East-AngKa,
where they were soon engaged in the peaceftd arts of
agriculture and commerce.*
The remainder of Alfred's time was chiefly occupied
in completing the subjugation of the Danes, whom he at
1 WQl. of MalmslmiT. Aster. 9 Saxon. Chron.
88 TAMWORTH
last established in the towns of Derby, Leicester, Lincoln,
Nottingham, and Stamford. From that drcumstanoe,
these places obtained the name of the Five Burghes.
He also now firamed and compiled his celebrated code of
laws, which, alike characterized by justice and wisdom,
has earned for him the distinguished and deserved title
of '' the Great." He died in 901 ; and was succeeded
by his son Eadweard the Elder/
Shortly after the destruction of Merda as a sovereignty,
the government of it was conferred, by Alfred, upon a
Saxon duke named Ethelred, to whom the king had
given in marriage his daughter Ethelflseda. Upon this,
he assumed the title of subregulus or viceroy, although, in
many of his charters, he sdled himself indifferently dux
and ealdorman.' The office was merely nominal, until
the Danes were overthrown by the illustrious monarch of
Wessex. Eadweard the Elder confirmed the government
to this nobleman jointly with his wife; and they held
it till the death of the former in 912. At that time,
Eadweard permitted Ethelflseda to retain her jurisdiction,
with the exception of the cities of London and Oxford,
which he took into his own hands.'
The ''Lady of the Marches" appears to have inhe-
rited no contemptible portion of her father's wisdom and
courage, and to have fully merited the high encomiums
bestowed upon her by every historian, both ancient and
modem. Bred up in the midst of continually impendent
dangers and possessing an energy of mind which quali-
fied her to take part in the state-co\incils both of her
father and her husband, she imbibed the spirit of a
warrior rather than that of a woman. After having
1 Sax. Chron. 3 Codex diplom. «vi S«zon. Chut AagloMZ.
3 Sax. Chron.
CASTLS AND TOWN. 39
given birth to a daughter, and suffered so severely as
well nigh to have lost her life, she withdrew entirely from
the marriage-couch and resigned all domestic concerns to
aid in promoting the public welfare. Her heroic courage
was particularly manifested in 916, when Hwgan, prince
of Wales, attempted to regain the lands, of which Offa
had dispossessed his predecessor. She completely des-
troyed his army and besieged him in his royal castle
at Breoenanmere, where she made his wife captive, with
thirty-four of her attendants. Pursuing him in his
flight to Derby, where he took refuge among the Danes,
she beset the town and vigorously stormed it. Undaimted
at the slaughter of four of her chief officers, the wardens
of her person, who fell by her side, she continued to
lead on her troops, until, one of the gates having been
destroyed by fire, they entered the town and took the
citadel, where the unfortunate Hwgan fell, maintaining
an heroic struggle to the last.'
One of the greatest cares of Ethelflseda to secure the
prosperity of her dominions, was the restoration of the
principal towns and fastnesses, which had been destroyed
in the late wars by the Danes. Tamworth was one of
those which came imder her earliest consideration, after
the decease of her husband and her assumption of the
whole government of Mercia. To this town she marched
with her whole army, in the early part of the summer
of 913. She caused it to be rebuilt : she restored the
castle and all the fortifications; and, to increase its
strength, raised a strong keep or dungeon upon a partly
artificial mound, on which the present edifice has been
erected in later times.' The town, after this happy
event, became the general residence of the magnanimous
1 Sax. Omni. a Sax. Cbion., John Rouse.
40 TAMWOBTH
princew; and regained once more its former celebrity
and importance.
Ethelflseda died at Tamworth on the 19 kalends of
July, — ^the ISth of June, — 8S0,' being then upwards of
sixty years of age. Her body was conveyed to Glouces-
ter and interred by the side of that of her husband, in
the eastern porch or aisle of the cathedral of St. Peter
there. The tomb was subsequently destroyed with the
whole church, by the Danes; but Alured, bishop of
Worcester, who was also made archbishop of Canterbury,
repaired both the edifice and the monument.* Over the
latter, was subsequently placed the following panegyric
on this princely lady ; written by Henry of Huntingdon,
nearly two hundred and thirty years after her decease.
" O Elfleda potent, O terror viifo Tirofuin,
yictriz natune, nomine digna TirL
Ta qno splendidior fieret, natnn poeUun
Te probitas fecit nomen habere viri.
Te mutare decet, led solom nomine, cexna,
Ta regina potena, rezque trophca parana.
Jam nee Csaard tantnm menMre triomphi;
Cvaare iplendidior, viigo, Yirago, Tale."
These lines have appeared repeatedly in various English
forms; but we subjoin a new and very firee translation.
O potent lady, great Elfled, dread of the alien host,
The oonqnest e'en of natore'a laws, thy manlinets can boast.
For though thon bear'at the soft impreia of woman's feeble frame,
Thy martial spirit renders thee worthy a hero's name.
Change then, O king and qnaen at onoe, thy stem and yalorons heart.
The wonted mildness of thy sex let nature re-impart ;
Or take the warrior's hardy form, mount on the restiff steed,
And to the plains where battles rage, victorious armies lead.
Casars in Tain their triumphs boast : a woman's deeds excel
The splendid prowess Cnsar show'd. Chaste heroine, farewell.
I Sax. Chron. 9 Holinahedl Chnmlclei.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 41
Ethelflaeda was succeeded in the government of Merda
by her daughter Healfwina or Alfvrin.' But Eadweard
the Elder, to whom her guardianship had been com-
mittedy finr reasons which are not clearly understood,
thought fit to deprive her of all authority. Three
weeks before midwinter, when she had held power
about half a year, he came into Mercia and carried her
finoeably with him into Wessex.' She is never again
mentioned in the annals of history, so that her fate is
unknown. It is probable that she died there, in the
course of two or three years.
But the deposition of Healfwina was not effected
without a struggle in her fiivour: for a considerable
dvil strife ensued. Inspired by an honourable grati-
tude at least, Tamworth, with Nottingham, Derby, and
some other towns, rose to assert the right of the only
child of their noble bene&ctress. The implication of
some of the five burghers in this commotion, appears,
in some degree, to confirm the assertion of Castoreus
and a few other writers, that she was divested of
power in consequence of her having promised and
contracted marriage with Reginald, the Danish king.
However that may be, the insurrection continued for
nearly two years. Eadweard was obliged to have re-
course to arms. He first marched to Tamworth and
subjugated it. From this place he proceeded with his
army to Nottingham and took the town, when the in-
surgents yielded. He afterwards rode back to the
borough of Tamworth, where all the Mercian people
previously subject to Ethelfiseda, and the kings of Wales,
whom this martial lady had conquered, Howel, sur-
I Stx. ChraiL, Flor. of Wore. a lb.
42 TAMWOETH
named Dha or the Good, Cledanc, and Jeothwell,
acknowledged him as their sovereign lord.^
Eadweard died in 924; and was succeeded by his son
Athelstan, who was crowned, with all wonted ceremony,
at ELingston-upon-Thames, by the archbishop of Canter-
bury.' The Danes, who held full possession of North-
umbria, had no sooner heard that a new king sat on
the Anglo-Saxon throne, than they made a fierce
irruption into his kingdom; hoping that, under a fresh
and inexperienced monarch, they might have success
they could not gain before. But Athelstan delayed not
to collect his' army; and, without spending his time and
power in pursuing the spoilers from place to place,
he marched boldly into the centre of their kingdom,
weakened by the absence of numerous troops, and
there obtained so great a victory, that the Danish king
Sihtric or Sygtryg, son of the celebrated Yvar, was
compelled to sue for peace. A treaty was then entered
into between the two parties. To confirm the bonds of
amity, Athelstan promised his sister Eadgitha in mar-
riage to Sihtric, on condition that he should embrace
the Christian fSedth. The kings came to Tamworth,
where the solemnization of the marriage took place on
the 8 kalends of February, — the 30th of Jan., — ^926,
after the performance of the required ceremony, the
reception into the church by baptism.'
The insincerity of this politic conversion was soon
apparent; for, on the first favourable opportunity, which
occurred very shortly after, Sihtric renounced his fidth
and broke through all the stipulations of the treaty.
Athelstan gathered his forces to invade the dominions
I Sax. Chnm., in ftnno 029., Flor. of Worcester, Ac. s Will, of Malmsburr.
S SwL. Chron., WiU. of Malmsbory.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 43
of the apostate; but, in the mean time, Sihtric died,
and his two sons by a former wife fled, Onlauf or Anlaf
into Ireland, and Guthfert or Grodefirid into Scotland.
Upon this, the whole of Northmnbria was annexed to
the Saxon dominions;' and Athelstan thus became the
first king of England, though that title has been erro-
neous ascribed, by numberless historians, to Ecgberht or
Alfied.
Eadgitha, or, as her name is generally spelt by later
writers, Editha, after the decease of her nominal hus-
band, retiring from the world, it is said, became abbess
of a nunnery which she founded at Tamworth, and there
was afterwards interred. But to her we shall refer more
particularly in speaking of the monastery.
In the year 938, Anlaf returned out of Ireland ; and,
having received aid from Constantine, king of Scotland,
and Howel, king of Wales, attempted to regain posses-
sion of Northmnbria. Athelstan met him at a place
called in the Saxon Chronicles Brunansburgh; but its
situation cannot now be certainly discovered. Whilst
the armies were preparing for battle, a curious incident
occurred which may be worthy of relation, as materially
affecting the fortunes of the contest. As Alfred had
once done, Anlaf passed into the camp of Athelstan,
in the disguise of a harper.' After amusing the king
for some time and gaining the intelligence he required,
1 WiU.ofMalmsbiUT.
9 This story coiiceniiiis Anlaf is giTen on the authority of WiU. of Malmsbury \
bat by many it is considered as deserrinr of little credit. The old annalists, and
eoofeasedly this writer, embodied in their works a great deal of matter derived only
tnm the impure soorce of popular ballads and traditions. Much then has been given
enthrely the result of bards* embellishments or malidons party spirit. Hence it is
that these histories, owing to a simple-minded over credulity, contain so many pre.
postcrooa legends and tales. Malmsbury*s work, though otherwise invaluable, is
replete with anecdotes, some of which have led him astray in matters of history.
Then are strong reasons for suspecting the accuracy of the implication of
Qncndrid in the murder of her brother Kenelm. The tale of the dove every one
would rejcctv though It is not improbable the revelation was made by the murderer
or an accom^ce in St. Peter's at Rome.
44 TAMWOBTH
he was dismissed with a piece of coin far his pains.
Actuated^ however, by the most bitter and deadly hatred,
the moment he supposed himself to be out of sight, he
threw the money from him with scorn. From this act he
was recognized by a sentinel standing on guard near.
The soldier let him pass unmolested, till he was com-
pletely out of reach, when he infarmed Athelstan of ihe
circumstance, and humbly urged the necessity ct the
king's removing his tent that ni^t. Being reproached far
permitting so deadly an enemy to go firee, the sentinel
replied that he had once taken an oath of allegiance to
the Dane as he had subsequently Acme to Athelstan,
and that nothing would induce him to violate so solemn
an engagement. The king expressed his admiration
of such heroic virtue, and, as we fear would hardly have
been done under the present enlightened system of
military discipline, forgave the offender. But it was
justly thought prudent to adopt his advice ; and the royal
pavilion was accordingly removed to a distance. A bishop,
coming soon afterwards to aid in the coundls of state,
caused his tent to be erected on the spot which the king
had occupied. As it was expected, the Danes, in the
darkness of the night, passed silently into the middle of
the camp, and, unaware of the change that had taken
place, slew the prelate and his whole retinue as they
slept, instead of Athelstan. The Saxons, being on the
watch and fully prepared, inmiediately attacked the
enemy. The engagement soon became general, and con-
tinued imoeasingly throughout the remainder of the
night and till sunset of the following day. The carnage
that ensued was terrible, being imparalleled since the
time when the Saxons first made themselves masters of
Britain. After a long and fearful struggle, the Danes
CASTLB AND TOWN. 45
were completely routed; and Athelstan remained the
glorious victor of the field.'
The Saxon annalist has described^ in long poetic strains^
this scene of warfare, both during the night, and
" After that the son
Rom in the moraiiig hoar,
The greatest star
Glad abore the earth,
God's candle bright.
The eternal Lord's,
THl the noble creatine
Hastened to her Bettii«/'
And when the Danes were completely vanquished and
compelled to fly,
" The Nortiunen,
In nailed ships,
The dreary rdics of injuries.
On the stormy sea,
Over the deep waters,
Songht DifeUn'
And their land,
Disgraced in mind.'
After this signal defeat, Anlaf dared not to return
from Ireland, until the death of Athelstan in 941. But
no sooner had Eadmimd the Elder succeeded his brother,
than this restless Dane, in accordance with the usual
custom of attacking a nation when somewhat weakened
and disordered by the accession of a new ruler, passed
again in Britain, accompanied by his cousin Reginald.
Being assisted by Olaus, king of Norway, and joined by
the Northumbrians, who were ill-satisfied with the Saxon
domination over them, he seized on the city of York.
From that place, he proceeded to Northampton; but
being failed in his attempt to take it, and anxious to
1 wm. of Malmsbiirr. 9 Dublin in Ireland. 9 Saz.Chron.
46 TAHWOBTH
harass the king by rapid and continued movements, he
marched direcdy to Tamworth, which he ** stormed, and
great slaughter was made upon either hand; but the
Danes gained the victory, and carried a^ay much plun-
der. There was Wulfirun taken in the spoiling of the
town."' Anlaf then went on to Leicester, and took the
place. There he came in contact, for the first time,
with the army of Eadmund ; and a sharp but indecisive
engagement ensued. Preparations were made for a re-
newal of the struggle at the dawn of the next morning;
but, through the intercession of the archbishops d[ Can-
terbury and York, hostilities were suspended, and a
treaty of peace proposed, in order to prevent, if possible,
the farther devastation of the country and its almost
certain ruin. It was finally agreed between the rival
princes that all the kingdom north of the Watling street
should be ceded to Anlaf and the south part retained
by Eadmund. The survivor of the two was to have
possession of the whole.'
Before the close of the year, the Saxon king regained
all his former territory, in consequence of the Dane
having fallen in an insurrection of his own fierce
and inconstant countrymen in Northumbria. The un-
fortunate Eadmund himself fell by the dagger of an
assassin, a short time subsequently, being stabbed in a
scuffle with a man on the feast of St. Augustin, apostle
of Britain, in 942.' He was then only nineteen years
old.
The disastrous siege and pillaging of Tamworth by
the Danes, when it fell into their hands this second
time, seems to have inflicted a blow upon it, from which
it never wholly recovered. Henceforward it ceased to
1 Sax. Chron. 9 Sim. of Dnriuin. a Will, of Malmibiiry.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 47
foim a royal residence^ or to be directly connected with
the annals of our country. This once famous and cele-
brated place^ the chosen dwelling of the great Offa and
the favoured seat of the Mercian government^ sank at
once into comparative obscurity, and was scarcely again
mentioned by historians for several centuries. Of it, till
the period of the Norman conquest, we find nothing
more recorded, except that there was a monastery here
in the time of Etheldred II, and that the name occurs
as a place of royal mintage.
Tamworth had undoubtedly enjoyed, with other great
places, the privilege of coining from a very early period,
at least, from the time of Offa. It is impossible to
recognize those previous to the middle of the tenth cen-
tury: for, although it was customary, even in the time of
Ecgberht, king of Kent, for the moneyer to have his
name . placed on the piece, the places were not added
untQ the reign of Athelstan, who ordained that all
money should be struck within towns alone.^
The coins of Tamworth are now exceedingly rare,
and consequently as highly prized by numismatists,
The name is first found upon a penny of Eadweard the
Martyr ; who succeeded' Edgar in 976 and was slain by
his step-mother, three years afterwards. It occurs under
the abbreviated superscription of tanwo. All the . money
of this king, which has hitherto been discovered, is of the
same type. The pieces bear, on the obverse, an ill-drawn
portrait, with his title as bex anglobum sometimes
given at length, though often in a contracted form. On
the reverse, is stamped a cross pate^, with the names of
the moneyer and of the mint.*
Of the coins of Ethelred II, or the Unready, who
1 RwUng^s Annalf of Coinage. 2 lb.
48 TAMWOBTH
ruled trooL 978 to 1016^ and of his immediate suooeasor,
Edmund 11, sumamed Ironside^ who fell after a short
reign of a few months, none have yet been found which
issued from this town. But in the time of the next
sovereign, Canute the Great, the mint was again in
activity. Pitt, in his account of Staffordshire, says that
** Kedar, a celebrated Swedish antiquary, has published
a coin of this monarch struck here, having on the reverse
EDBic ON tam; i. e. 'Edric, Moneyer in Tamworth.'
The name of the same mint-master is found also on a
coin in the Bodleian Cabinet at Oxford; but we have
not had the good fortune to see either the representation
of the coins, or the coins themselves."* Edric appears
among the list of moneyers given by Ruding, although
the town is not mentioned by this author.
Canute, dying in lOSd, was succeeded by his son
Harald Harefoot; who continued till 1042, when Hardi-
Canute ascended the throne. In the reign of these kings
are found no coins of the mint at Tamworth; but among
those of Edward the Confessor this name occurs ; being
spelt both Tonwvrth and Tonwyrth. "The types of
his coins," says Ruding, " are more diversified than those
of any of his predecessors. As * his coins, which have
been preserved, are very numerous, nearly 500 varieties
being known, so the manner in which his name and
title are signified upon them, is likewise extremely
varied by almost every possible mode of ill-spelling.
They have chiefly the initial, or the whole of anolobtth
upon the observe ; and the circle of the reverse is fiUed
with the name of the mint and the Moneyer, except in
one instance where Spraceling (the name of the moneyer)
occupies the whole of it."*
1 Topogxaphical Hiit of Sttftoiteh.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 49
We have been unable either to procure a sight or to
obtain a more particular account of these Tamworth
pieces. The only specimen of the Confessor's coinage
issued from this town, with which we are acquainted,
is a silver penny, bearing, on the obverse, the inscription
BDWAKD BEX, and, on the reverse, bevning on tam.
We give a representation of it.
Edward the .Confessor, dying on the 5th of January,
1066, was succeeded by Harald II.
Of the coins of this sovereign, three varieties have
been found, which, notwithstanding his brief reign, are
far from being of uncommon occurrence. On the obverse,
they bear his name and title of king of England ; and
on the reverse, the name of the moneyer and the place
of mintage. All of them have the word pax across
the centre.* In the catalogue of his mints given by
Ruding, occurs the abbreviation tan, which this great
numismatist conjectured to have been either Tamworth,
or Taunton, in Somersetshire. Unfortunately he has not
given the names of the moneyers in connection with
those of the mints. Otherwise we might have decided
the question; for, at the time, Bruning was the master
of the mint at Tamworth.
It may be well, whilst we are speaking of the coinage
of the town, to conclude at once our account of it.
Though the adoption of such a course may violate, in
1 Radiof '• Annals of Coinage.
H
50 TAMWORTH
some degree^ the strict order of narration, in a chro-
nological point of view^ it will prevent the necessity of
a recurrence to this subject.
After the conquest, the royal mint at Tamworth con-
tinued in activity until the time of Henry I., in whose
reign it was discontinued.* The coins of William I.,
which were struck here, are not quite of so great rarity
as those of the Anglo-Saxon monarchs. They are,
nevertheless, of much value. The engraving, which we
subjoin, is that of a silver penny of the Norman
Conqueror of England.*
On the obverse, is inscribed simply willbmu rex, and
on the reverse brvning on tanwi. It will be noticed
that the same mint-master continued at Tamworth, as
in the time of the Confessor.
Of the money struck at the town subsequently to
the reign of this king, we have been unable to obtain
the detailed information, which we might desire. Pitt
says " In the reign of William the second, we find the
Tamworth mint again employed, a coin of that sovereign
(formerly in the collection of the celebrated Dr. Mead),
bearing on the reverse ielfwine on tam; but as we
know not where the coin now is, nor have seen either
a similar piece, or any engraving of it, we are unable
to gratify our readers by a more accurate account of it"'
1 Ruding's Annals of Coinag^e.
3 This penny was purchased at the sale of the late Rev. F. Slick's valuable collec-
tion of cofais. in June. 1843, and is now in the possession of the publisher : Sir George
Chetwyndt Bart., of Qrendon Hall, also possesses a similar piece.
3 Topographical Hist, of £^ ~ '
CASTLE AND TOWN. 51
The very great similarity of the pieces of this king to
those of his father, renders it extremely difficult to
distinguish their respective coinages. The types of
Henry Ist's money are as diversified as in the reign of
any subsequent sovereign. But the coins of William
Bufiis and of Henry, which were struck at Tamworth,
are so exceedingly scarce, that we have never met with
them.
After the Norman conquest, in 1066, Tamworth is
first mentioned in Doomsday-book, completed about the
year 1086. There is no direct survey of this town; but
it is incidentally mentioned in the account given of
other places. Ten bui^sses in Tamworth are said to
have belonged to the manor of Coleshill, and eight to
that of Draytoh; and, in the report concerning the
village of Wigginton, four more are named as being
here.*
The omission of many important places in this cele-
brated record, has furnished a subject of much debate;
but no very satisfactory explanation has been given.
Dean Lyttelton conjectured that towns, which were
terra r^s, or rather royal boroughs, being well known
as to their extent and value, it was needless to name,
as they claimed the right of being taxed according to
their ancient cess: and the Doomsday was only com-
piled in order to know the true value of every man's
lands, with a view to tax them.^ It will, however, be
observed that not only boroughs, but extensive rural
districts, have been left entirely unnoticed. The com-
missioners, who traversed the country to make the
survey, have been, by some, accused of partiality, allow-
ing themselves occasionally to be influenced by gifts. But
1 Doomsday .book, printed by royal authority. a Letter io Shaw*8 Staflbrdsh.
52 TAHWORTH
it is incredible, even taking it for granted thejr were
willing, that they dared to make omissions of so great
magnitude and frequency, as is found to be the case.
The opinion of Lyttelton seems to approximate nearer to
to the truth than any other which has hitherto been
given. The Doomsday appears to have been composed
for the purpose of regulating the tenures and imposts
of places where they had not been previously arranged,
or concerning which there might be some doubt: but
those comparatively few localities, where the services had
been already fixed, generally at the time of their grant
to some Norman lord, were not unnecessarily surveyed
by the commissioners. The Conqueror was not so
mindful of the Saxon liberties, as to allow the towns
to retain their old cess, or mode of tai^tion.
The subjugation of England was accompanied by a
complete overthrow of the ancient constitution of the
country. The Saxons were every where deprived of
power, and levelled, in the agricultural districts, to the
rank of the humble farmer and artizan, who were called
by their new masters villans. Thus, as if to show the
degradation of the burgesses of Tamworth, after having
spoken, under the head of Drayton, of the eight at
this town, the Doomsday adds that here they laboured
as other villans did. The people were no longer per-
mitted to continue freeholders. The king, by right of
arms, claimed the possession of the whole land; and
he exercised his power of granting it away at will, in
conformity with the feudal system, which he introduced
into this country. Reserving in his own hands the
greater proportion, that is, all the large cities and
boroughs, he gave the rest of the towns and lands, for
particular services rendered to him, to nearly 700 of his
CASTLE AND TOWN. 68
followers^ as tenants-in-chief. By them^ the lands were
let^ for payments and charges^ at pleasure, to the humbler
grades of men, or the great mass of the population.
Their deprivation of all authority and reduction to a
grade little superior to that of slaves, however oppres-
sive and imjust to the Saxons themselves, served as the
best means, whereby the king might secure permanently
the conquest which he had made. He not only at-
tached his own countrymen to his interests, by con-
ferring immense possessions on them, but, by placing
the inhabitants under their control, he prevented the
Saxons from ever successfully rising to depose their
conquerors and regain their liberties. It is evident,
from the Doomsday, that even the guild-halls were given
away in the division of the spoil. The church alone
v^as allowed, for the most part, to retain her lands;
and those undoubtedly would have been seized, had it
not been in the power of the king to secure them to
himself, by appointing Normans in all the greatest and
most important ecclesiastical offices.
But the Saxons were not only compelled to pay a
rent-charge for their individual holdings ; they were also
subject to arbitrary taxations, called tallages and aids.
It was in the power of the king alone to demand them
at pleasure, whenever necessity or caprice should require.
The revenues of the Anglo-Saxon state were raised by
similar contributions, but not without the full consent
of the national council. They were collected, in each
county, by the shire-reeve, and in each town, by the
borough or port-reeve. The latter officer was elected by
his own townsmen, in a general assembly, frequently
held in the open air, but generally within doors, at the
hus-tings, where the inhabitants were accustomed to as-
64 TAKWORTH
assemble, in order to frame bye-laws for their common
good and the well-government of the town. William I.
and his son Bufus took into their own hands the
choice of the borough-reeves, and delegate to each place
one of their own countrymen, to whom the title of
bailiff was given. The appointments were usually con-
ferred on those, who paid the highest sums for them;
and they became matters of pecuniary speculation.
The Norman bailiffs, having almost uncontrolled power
of exaction, exercised the functions of their office in a
most insupportable manner. This grievous oppression
was felt more severely by the Saxons, on account of the
freedom of election, which they had previously enjoyed,
and the lenity which a countryman and fellow-townsman
naturally showed towards them. In many places, revolts
ensued, not only to abolish this abuse but to restore the
good laws of Edward the Confessor. In the north of
England, the insurrections were the most formidable;
and they were only suppressed by acts, of which both
Saxon and Norman historians speak in terms of great
abhorrence and lamentation. Hence we may well con-
ceive the nature of the measures taken against the
unfortunate people, whose only crime was their endea-
vour to maintain their wonted liberties.
But the Saxons, in the mean time, did not neglect
to have recourse to quieter and more politic methods of
gaining some alleviation from the oppression which they
suffered. The burgesses of towns, in order to free
themselves from the great scourge of Norman bailiffs,
offered higher sums for the liberty of choosing their
own officers than individuals could usually afford, or
was consistent with a profitable investment of money.
The king, finding this an advantageous mode of more
CASTLE AND TOWN. 65
fully replenishing his treasury, at last fully adopted the
mode of selling the right to the inhabitants for an
annual payment. He had little cause to fear much
difficulty in obtaining the stipulated amount, as a dread
of the return of the Norman bailiff would naturally
render the people punctual. Hence arose the custom
of annual fee-farm rents being paid by boroughs to the
crown. These places resumed at once their ancient
form of free government; and the officer over each
either re-adopted the old name of borough-reeve, or
retained the later one of bailiff. Sometimes he was
caUed, from the Latin^ a mayor, as he constituted the
head of the little community. He was, in all cases,
esteemed the officer of the crown, and was held respon-
sible for the fee-fium rent and other payments, when-
ever they should be demanded. But when any arrears
occurred, it was customary for the barons of the ex-
chequer, the king's attorney, or other officer, to sue the
townsmen collectively, until the adoption of a select
corporate body deprived the inhabitants generally of the
power and right to legislate for themselves. This
change did not take place before the 16th century.*
In the sketch, which we have given, of the organ-
ization and form of government of boroughs, at the
period of, and a little subsequently to, the conquest,
we have only dwelt on such points as were necessary
to elucidate our subject. We now return more par-
ticularly to the history of Tamworth.
From the end of the reign of William II., to the
time of Henry III., very little appears on record con-
cerning this town, besides the payments of aids, and a
visit which it received from Henry II.
1 See Fenny Cydopadla :— Art. Borougli.
66 TAMWORTH
Of the royal presence here, nothing more is particu*
larly noticed than that the king then signed the charter,
confirming to the monks of Merevale the grant whidi
earl Robert de Ferrers, for the soul of Robert his
fitther, for the health of his own soul and of that of
his wife, made to the church of the same place, to the
intent that an abbey of the Cistertian order should be
erected. For this purpose, the earl gave all his property
in the forest Arden, and whatever he possessed in
Whittington, with the manors of Weston and Overton
(Orton-on-the-hill), also Crannockstone, with common
pasture in Hertington and Pilsbury for sheep and other
cattle. These the king established, with all subsequent
purchases and acquirements, especially the gifts of
Gerard de Lunese, Walter de Canwell, and Radulph
and Paganus de Baskervile.'
The royal charter was dated on the 12th of March ;
but, as occurs very frequently in ancient documents, the
year was not added, so that the precise time of the
king's visit to Tamworth is unknown. We may, how-
ever, ascertain the period within seven years; for
Theobald, archbishop of Canterbury, who was a witness
to the deed, with the bishop of Chester and the chan-
cellor, was succeeded, on his decease in April, 1161, by
Thomas ^ Becket. It must, therefore, have occurred
between the accession of the king in 1154, and that
event.
It has been supposed that, after 15 Hen. II., and
previously to the reign of Henry III., Tamworth had
fallen so greatly into decay, that it ceased to exist any
longer as a borough.' This is partly incorrect; but it
1 Da(dale*B Monaat. AnfUcan.
J Merewether tad Stopheaa* Hkt. of Boroaglu uid Moaidptl CoxporatioDt.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 57
would be more than absurd to deny that the town
declined in a yery considerable degree. This is clearly
evident from several circumstances. The aid, which it
paid in 1 Hen. L, — 1100, — amounted to 80s.; but it
was reduced, in the Slst year of the same king, to 25s.,
when the burgesses were pardoned that sum by royal
writ, on account, as it is expressly said, of their poverty.
Also, in 1139, the burgesses paid two sums of 26s. each,
one for a past, the other for a new aid; when they
were again excused an equal amount for a similar cause.
In 1155, the aid was the same; and three years after-
wards, the town paid a donum of lOOs.^ AU these
returns are for the Staffordshire side. Dugdale mentions
aids of the part which came under his observation, as
being rendered in 1 Steph., and 7, 11, 15, Hen. H., —
1135, 1160, 1164, and 1168,— in the latter year, two
marks, — ^26s. 8d., — ^being paid.'
Hence it is evident, from the decrease of the aids and
the subsequent pardons, that the town was declining,
at least in wealth. After the year 1168, we do not
find the payments of aids at all, even during the reigns
of the first Edwards. In 1222, in the roll of tallage
for Staffordshire, it is called ^' villata de Tameworde ; '
and, in 1315^ the sheriff of the same county, being re-
quired to state how many boroughs there were within
the limits of his jurisdiction, returned only Stafford^
totally omitting this town.' How for the situation of
the place in two counties may have led to its exclusion
remains for some consideration.
But however Tamworth may have sunk, it is evident
that it sflll remained a borough, although it did not
1 Pipe roll for Staifordaliire.— Merewether and Stephens.— Mm1ox*s Hist.
and Antiquities of the Bzcheqner.
3 Dii(dale's Wwwickab. 3 Merewether and Stephens.
I
58 TAMWORTH
call into action its priyileges as such until the time of
Elizabeth. This will be clearly evident from our ensu-
ing narrative. Pitt says that it was declared a firee
corporation in the time of Henry III.; and the charter^
being forfeited, was restored by Edward II.*
When Simon de Montfort, at the time he held
Henry III. as a prisoner, in 1265, issued writs to each
of the sheriffs of the kingdom to return two knights
for each county, two citizens for each city, and two
burgesses for each borough, to form a general council^
Tamworth was not included.' It was then chiefly in
the power of one of the most faithful adherents to the
king, Philip de Marmyon, — a circumstance which more
than probably caused its exclusion. In similar assem-
blages convoked by Edward I. and his successors, for
the purpose of fSEU^ilitating taxation, the town was also
omitted. When this body of representatives, gradually
assumed full legislative powers, and formed the House
of Commons, the management and control of it became
a very important object to the kings. The sherifls were
now directed to single out or omit any boroughs at
pleasure, so as in fact to form a body as select and
confined in numbers as possible. Every mode was
adopted to render it submissive to the royal will. In
1381, the Commons proceeded so far in the exercise of
their power, as to impose fines on a sheriff omitting
any place, and on the citizens or burgesses neglecting
to return the required members. But even after this,
excuses were admitted, for a very considerable period, to
to be valid, as inability to pay the parliamentary wages
of the representatives, loss from war, or any other cause.'
1 Topographical, hist, of Staffordsh. a Merewether and Stephens.
3 See Penny CydopKdia :— Art. Borough.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 69
We accordingly find many boroughs, and among them
this town, not exercising their powers of aiding in the
councils of the country.
The cause of the decline of Tamworth may be easily
conjectured. From the Doomsday-book, it may be well
inferred that the town, after the conquest, was in-
habited chiefly by Lilians and sur£s, the tradesman,
labourer, artizan, and the slave. The depression of
the Saxons, the devastating wars between Stephen and
the empress Maud, the absence of the nobles and the
great land-owners in the holy wars of Palestine, the
struggle between Henry III. and his barons, and finally
the long and terrible wars between the houses of York
and Lancaster, were, indeed, ill calculated to promote
the advancement of agriculture and its dependent rustic
arts, on which the inhabitants of this place almost
wholly relied. But from the time of Edward I., we
can trace an improvement in the general state of the
town. Although very gradual, it continued with a
steady and uniform pace, until within the last century
and a half, when the changes became much more rapid.
We must now turn our attention from the very
general and enlarged view, in which we have been
lately compelled to give the history of Tamworth, to
subjects of more particular and limited interest. And
this course of proceeding we adopt with the greater
pleasure, as we enter into a field freer from the dry
details^ which have demanded our chief consideration,
since the period of the conquest. The first point, which
will occupy our regard, is one connected with tales and
legends, heard with intense interest and gratification in
the vernal days of childhood, and remembered with
pleasure, when the winter of life has chilled the energy
of youth, and hoary made the head.
60 TAIiWORTH
According to the common tradition of the locality,
Tamworth and the surrounding neighbourhood were
the frequent resort of the famous outlaw, Robin Hood.
By the name of his butts, have ever been known the
Roman tumuli at Wig^inton and Elford. It has been
suggested that they might have received this appella-
tion, merely from their being the common arohery
grounds, where the people practised the noble art,
once so highly prized in this kingdom. But, had it
been usual for such places to be so named, every town
and village would have boasted of its Robin Hood's
butts. There is not the least improbability in his
visiting this place, as he so constantly haunted localities
within about thirty miles distant. The extensive royal
woods around this town would doubtless form a rich
field for his adventures. The tale, hovrever, that he
was able to shoot from one of these butts to the other
seems to have been a modem addition, in order to ac-
count for their designation. It was in fact a total im-
possibility, as the distance is nearly two miles. The
longest shot which Robin is recorded to have made,
was when he was requested to exhibit his dexterity
with the bow by Richard, abbot of Whitby, with whom
he and his lieutenant. Little John, went to dine, most
probably without waiting for the formality of a special
invitation. From the top of the abbey, he and his
companion let two arrows fly, which fell, one on either
side of a lane, not far tram Whitby laths. The
distance was about a mile and a quarter ; and it must
have been very considerably increased by the elevated
situation which the shooters occupied, as the abbey
stood on the summit of a cliff. This feat occurred in
1188. In memory of the transaction, the abbot caused
CASTLE AND TOWN. 61
two pillars to be erected^ where the arrows fell, on each
of which was inscribed the name of the shooter.'
We are^ indeed^ unwilling to lose the connection of
Tamworth with the bold rover of the forests. He is
the only male&ctor^ whose memory reflects no disgrace
on those places, with which his name is associated.
On the contrary, it has attached an almost sacred cha*
racter to them ; for the very crimes of the outlaw were
rendered hallowed to succeeding generations. His con-
stant opposition to the tyranny of the Norman lords
and his principles of equality endeared him, in the
strongest manner, to the Saxons, who formed the great
mass of the populaticm. For, according to the old
historians, though an arch-robber, he was the gentlest
thief that ever hved, and a man of unbounded charity.
The opulent and noble he deprived of their wealth, to
enrich the poor; and for the oppressed, he frequently
obtained the redress, for which they vainly sought else-
where. He was not destitute of the deep religious
temper of those olden times, which influenced every
action of life, and, however anomalous it might be
thought, gave a peculiar tinge even to the commission
of misdeeds themselves. The same source of all the
refined feelings, which characterize Christianity, gave
him, in common with the rest, that generous and noble
disposition towards the tenderer sex, so universal in the
isLjn of chivalry, whence it as descended to our times.
For, according to the old ballad,
Robin loved our dere Lady ;
For doate of deddy aynne,
Wolde he never do company harm
That any woman was ynne.
1 Chait(m*s Hist, of WhUby Abbey.
62 TAMWORTH
There has been much dispute respecting the title
which Robin Hood is said to hare possessed of earl of
Huntingdon. His real name is conjectured to have
been Robert Fitz-ooth; and the conmion-people, drop-
ping the Norman Fitz, modified it into Hood.' Robin
might probably have been an alteration of Roving^ — a
title most appropriate to him^ on account of the un-
settled and wandering life which he led. All the
ballads concerning him present the marks of changes
in orthography, at different periods. If these opinions
be. correct, he most certainly was connected with
the family of Simon de St. Liz, earl of Huntingdon.
But in the old legends, he is often styled simply a
yeoman. Thus . one, entitled '^ a lytell geste of Robyn
hode and his meyne, and of the proude sheryfe of
Notyngham," begins
*' Lithe and lysten, gentylmen,
That be of fre-bore blode :
I ihall yon teU of a good yenum,
Hit name was Robyn hode."'
This circumstance has formed the foundation of one
of the greatest objections, which has been urged against
his having held the title. A little consideration, however,
will remove the difficulty, in a very great measure. A
yeoman he might have been; for he does not appear to
have possessed any estates. It is probable that the
family property was confiscated in his father's time, in
consequence of the rebellion of Robert de Ferrers
against Henry II., in 1173. According to the collec-
tion, called '' Robin Hood's Garland," he was a native
of Loxley, which belonged to the Ferrers' family.' He
1 Stakeler's Patoogn^liia Britannioa.
S Percy's RaUqnM of andent En^liih poetry.
S It was probably the loss of his patrimony, wUcb compelled Robin Hood to associate
with men, whom the sererity of the Norman forest-laws had driven to extremes.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 63
could not have assumed the title until the death of
John Scott, tenth and last earl of Huntingdon (also of
Chester), in 12S7. He was, at that time, an old man ;
and his deeds of renown were almost brought to a
close. Hence the ballads relating to exploits which
occurred previously to this time might rightly denomi-
nate him a yeoman.
But even supposing that Robin Hood were Fitz-ooth,
his right to the earldom of Huntingdon was of a very
dubious nature. It would rather descend with the
sisters and coheiresses of John Scott, than pass to him.
It is not improbable that he might have assumed the
title whilst it lay dormant, or it was assigned to him by
the people, rather than that he properly possessed it.
In tact, without regarding any other point, he was
incapable as an outlaw of holding it. But here we
are entering so deeply into the wide region of conjec-
ture, that we shall draw this part of our subject to a
conclusion.
Bold Robin died when he must have attained an age
of upwards of eighty years. The stone over his humble
tomb, near the nunnery of Kirklees, in Yorkshire, still
remains. It once bore this inscription, now effaced by
time.
l^ttttf uttHemealv tHa latil tfteant
lat; tttbtvtj earl of j^untingtun ;
lua arcj^ir ber a; j^fe tiae gtuHt
an pipl kmin im i^loi^in ^tta.
»itk utlalDj asf U an i| nun
toil SnglanH nibir tfi agen.
oi^tit 24 iial. ttefcemdruSt 1247.'
1 Tlioretbj*! Daest. Leod.
64 TAMWORTH
In pursumg the early history of Tamworih^ it will be
necessary to divide the town into the respectiTe parts in
each county; for they were separated into two distinct
manors^ each governed by its own officers, holding its
own courts, and in short, acting entirely independently
of one another.
The Staffordshire part continued to be royal demesnes,
a fee-farm rent of 51. being rendered annually for it,
until the time of Henry III. In 1246, the king gave
it and Wigginton, with the manor of Wolverhampton,
in Staffordshire, and other lordships, in diffinnent coun-
ties, to Henry de Hastings and Ada his wife, in
exchange for their portion of the earldom of Chester.'
This Henry de Hastings, who possessed extensive
lands in the coimties of Warwick, Bedford, Leicester,
Salop, Norfolk, and Suffolk, was of a very eminent
and noble family, which came into England at the
time of the Norman conquest. They derived their sur-
name from one of the Cinque-ports, in Sussex, with
which they were connected for a considerable period.
The wife of Henry was of a still more illustrious ancestry,
being of the royal lineage of Scotland. She was the
third daughter of David, earl of Huntingdon and Car-
rick, and Maud his wife, daughter of Hugh, and sister
and coheiress of Ralph, who was the third earl of Chester.
David, earl of Huntingdon, was grandson of David I.,
and brother of Malcolm IV., and William the Lion, all
three of whom were kings of Scotland. His son John
assumed the surname of Scott, and became, in the right
of his mother, earl of Chester. But he died without
issue; and his three sisters became his coheiresses, of
whom Ada was one, and carried her share of the pro-
perty to her husband.
1 Rot. 31 H. III., m. 4 :'8baw'i Stallbrdih.— Coipontlon records.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 05
Henry de Hastings was a distinguished person in the
time of Henry III/ He accompanied this monarch in
his expedition into France, in 1^2, to support the
cause of Hugh de Lusignan, count de la Marche. This
nobleman had married Isabella consort- of John and
mother of Henry. Too proud to own allegiance to the
French king, and indignant at being considered as the
vassal of a foreign power, she persuaded her husband
to refuse homage to Alphonso, on whom his brother,
Louis IX., had conferred the French part of Poiteau.
The count threw himself on the protection of Henry.
But, as in most other undertakings, this weak monarch
was totally unsuccessful; and Hugh de Lusignan was
compeUed to make submission to his rightful liege.
Louis speedily reduced the English division of Poiteau ;
and he would soon bave driven his opponents entirely
from all their possessions on the continent, had not
conscientious scruples arisen in his just and upright
mind. The English suffered a signal defeat at Xante;
where many of the nobility were taken prisoners ; and,
amongst them, Henry de Hastings. The king afterwards
concluded a treaty with Louis, and returned to England
in September, I2i8. On this occasion, he gratified his
vanity by proceeding firom Portsmouth to London with
the pomp of a conqueror, attended by all his military
tenants.
Henry de Hastings did not very long remain in
captivity. He was exchanged, with others, by the
French, for some of their party, whom the English
had taken. Afterwards, with the principal nobles of
the realm, he attended Richard, earl of Cornwall, who
1 Hie acoooot of the Hastingi' family li chiefly derived from the works of Do^ale,
Matth. of Wettmioeter, Weliiiigtism, and Froissart.
66 TAMWORTH
proceeded with a splendid retinue into France. The
precise purpose of the expedition is unknown. In that
journey, he died, about the end of the year 1250. He
left a son Henry, then a minor, and two daughters^
Margery and Hillaria, who were then receiving their
education in the nunnery of Alneston.
At his decease, Henry de Hastings possessed Wi^;in-
ton and the moiety of Tamworth. In an inquisition,
without date, about this period, made by Galfrid, son
of Warin, of the extent of the manor of Wigginton,
it is stated that, in the town of Tamworth, there were
burgesses who rendered annually 46«. 8d. for their
burgages; three marks and a half, at the will of the
king, for their courts; and half a mark, also at the
king's pleasure, for view of frank-pledge: thus making
altogether an amount of 5/. During the time that these
places were held together, they were often considered as
forming but one manor; although they were in reality
quite distinct.
The guardianship of Henry de Hastings, on the death
of his father, was committed to Guy de Lusignan, son
of the count de la Marche and half-brother of Henry III.
Two years afterwards, this nobleman transferred his
charge to William de Cantilupe, lord of Abergavenny,
to whom the king confirmed it, with the custody of all
the estates. In the tenure-roll of the hundred of Offlow,
about 1255, it is said that Robert Waldrand held Wig-
ginton, by reason of the heir of Henry de Hastings, in
exchange for the part of the lands in Cheshire ; and it
was estimated at the annual value of 30/.'
Henry de Hastings, having attained his majority, did
homage to the king, and took full possession of his father's
1 Corpormtion Records. S Shaw's Staffordsh.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 67
lands. He then married Joan^ daughter of William de
Cantilupe, his guardian ; and became a person of great
note and consideration in the country.
In 1261 9 he was summoned to attend the king at
Shrewsbury, on the feast of the Nativity of the blessed
Virgin Mary; well famished with horse and arms, in
order to march against Llewellyn ap Griffith, prince of
Wales, who had risen in open rebellion. In the fol-
lowing year, he had similar orders to repair to London,
on the day after the feast of Sts. Simon and Jude.
Again in 1264, he was commanded to be at Worcester,
for the same purpose, on the ensuing Lammas-day : and
he was summoned as first baron Hastings, to the parlia-
ment about to be assembled on the 14th of December.
But in this latter year, the great defection among the
barons, mainly attributable to the weak and tyrannical
conduct of the king, began to manifest itself in acts of
violent opposition. Henry de Hastings now associated
himself with Simon de Montfort, earl of Leicester, and
other rebellious persons. With Henry and Simon, the sons
of this nobleman, and others, he was included in the sen-
tence of excommunication, pronoimced by the archbishop
of Canterbury, on account of the great and formidable
outrages, which they committed against the church and
clergy. He afterwards became a most active and zealous
leader of the disaffected party. When, by mutual con-
sent, Henry referred the causes of contention for arbi-
tration and adjustment to Louis IX., he was one of
those named on the part of the barons, as a surety for
their adherence to the determination which should be
made by the French monarch.
The decision of Louis, notwithstanding the strict
jusHce and impartiality by which it was characterized.
08 TAMWOBTH
proved satisfactory to neither party: and the king and
barons were at once invoWed in open warfare. In the
battle fought at Lewes, on the 14th of May, 1264, the
royal party was completely routed; and the king and
his son, prince Edward, were taken prisoners by the
rebels. Henry de Hastings, haying greatly distinguished
himself by extraordinary feats of valour in the combat,
xeceivedy as a reward, the honour of knighthood at the
hand of Simon de Montfort; and he was invested with
the office of governor of the castles of Scarborough and
Winchester.
After a short time, prince Edward efiected his escape
from the guards at Hereford castle, where he had been
detained in honourable captivity. Joined by all his
former partizans, and by numbers who had taken offence
at many of the actions of Simon de Montfort, he soon
raised a large force to rescue his father and subdue the
barons. The two armies met on a plain near Evesham,
in Worcestershire. The earl of Leicester, as soon as he
saw the nimiber of his opponents, and their orderly
march, exclaimed in despair '^ God have mercy on our
souls, our bodies are prince Edward's." All his hopes
of success at once fled ; yet he determined on maintain-
ing the struggle to the last. Gathering around him his
friends and supporters, Hugh Spencer, Henry de Hast-
ings, Ralph Basset of Drayton, and many others, he
endeavoured to persuade them to provide for their own
safety by flight, whilst he remained to sustain the brunt
of the combat. They all refrised ; and, prepared for the
worst fate, they commenced the battle, which took place
on the 4th of August, 1265. The baronial party fought
with a fury, which desperation could alone inspire. But
they were completely oveithrown; and Simon de Mont-
CASTLE AND TOWN. 69
fort and Henry his son^ with innumerable others of the
nobility, were slain. Simon, the eldest son of the
earl, fled to Axholme and fortified it; but he was sooa
obliged to capitulate to the prince. With his brother
Guy, he was banished from the kingdom. Another
party in Hampshire was headed by Adam de Gurton,
a Tery yaliant man, who at length was made prisoner
by Edward ; and receiving pardon, became one of his most
faithful adherents. The majority of the rebels took re-
fuge in the isle of Ely ; where they continued until they
were compelled to surrender on the 15th of July, 1267.
Immediately after the defeat of the barons, Henry de
Hastings retreated, with the remainder of his troops,
to the strong castle of Kenilworth, in Warwickshire,
according to a hasty arrangement. There he shut
himself up, resolved to hold out as long as possible, in
hopes of succour from France. The place was soon in*
rested by the liberated king, who . kept up a continued
siege for nearly six months. Hastings harassed the
besiegers exceedingly, and committed great havoc among
them, by casting immense stones and collections of rub*
bish from the engines on the walls, and by repeated,
and most daring sallies from the gates, whenever any
chances of success appeared. Henry, finding himself
thus foiled in his endeavours to take the place, sent
gracious offers of pardon and reward to him, if he would
surrender peaceably. The fierce warrior refused to listen
for a moment to any treaty, and caused the messenger
of peace to be maimed in a most brutal manner^
Ottobon, the papal legate, afterwards elevated to the
pontificial chair as Adrian V., thereupon thundered out
an anathema against him, on accoimt of his contumacy
and cruelty; but he paid no regard to the censures of
70 TAMWORTH
the churchy and continued his stubborn resistance.
Soon afterwards, however, there broke out in the garri-
son a violent pestilential fever; which, aided by the
fiiilure of provisions, swept away great numbers of the
troops. Finding it impossible to obtain supplies,
Hastings was at length compelled reluctantly to capi-
tulate, which he accordingly did on honourable terms :
as the rebels were aU suffered to depart from the castle
'' with their lives, members, and goods safe." Henry
marched out of his strong-hold on the eve of St.
Thomas the apostle, — ^the 20th of December.
On account of the obstinacy which he had manifested,
he was, however, excluded from participation in the
benefits of the treaty between the king and the barons,
called the Dictmn de Kenilworth. His estates were
confiscated; and he received sentence condemning him
either to seven years imprisonment, or to unconditional
submission to royal clemency. The proud noble pre-
ferred rigorous confinement to voluntary humiliation.
On the forfeiture of Hastings' property, previously
to the grant of part to other persons, an inquisition
was taken at Tamworth, on the 20th of August, 1266,
of the extent of the king's manor of Wigginton
and Tamworth, before William de Clifford, escaetor
beyond Trent, and Thomas de Thamenhom, Henry de
Packington, Roger de Comberford, Simon le Sauvage,
Robert de Cotes, of the county of Stafford, and others.
They stated on oath, after describing the royal demesnes
in Wigginton, that the rent of assize of the burgesses
in this town, on the Warwickshire side, was 2/. 8s. 4J.,
and on the Staffordshire side, 21. lOs. : and the latter
were wont to give for the paimage of their hogs' half
1 licence to feed the animals on the fallen acorns in the king's wood.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 71
a mark^ — 6*. 8rf.* The Staffordshire part with Wigginton
was then bestowed on Philip de Marmyon, lord of the
Castle^ for the term of his natural life.
Before the expiration of the first two years of Henry
de Hastings' imprisonment, the king was prevailed upon,
by prince Edward, to grant pardon to his unyielding
prisoner. He was accordingly liberated, and admitted
to the full advantages of the Dictum; and the greatest
portion of his property was restored to him. But
Tamworth and Wigginton do not appear to have been
given back to his family, previously to the year 1279.'
Henry de Hastings died very shortly after his en-
largement. The captivity, which he had suffered, seems
to have chafed his turbulent and active spirit, and
completely undermined his bodily health. He left two
sons, John, who succeeded him, and Edmund, and three
daughters, Audrey, Laura, and Joan. It is evident that
his lady did not at all participate in the royal indig-
nation, on account of the conduct of her husband: for
we find that the king bestowed upon her many rich
and fair lands for her support.
John de Hastings was only six years of age, when
his father died. On attaining his majority, in 1283, he
took possession of all his father's estates; and then the
moiety of Tamworth and Wigginton were doubtlessly
yielded up to him. Being heir of his maternal imde,
he acquired the castle and honour of Abergavenny, the
castle of Kilgaran, and other considerable property.
During the absence of Edward I. from England, in
1287, when he had passed over into Gascoigne, on the
succession of Philip the Fair to the throne of France,
1 Bscaet. SO H. III., Ashmolean M. S. 859, p. 199 :— Shaw's Staffordsh.
2 Se« Appendix ;~Note 1 .
78 TAMWOBTH
to renew his homage for his foreign domains^ the
Welsh^ only a short time previously subjugated^ again
rose in revolt for the recovery of their independence.
As the king remained abroad about three years and a
half, Edmund, earl of Comvrall, then regent, marched
into Wales, and with some difficulty suppressed the
insurrection. John de Hastings accompanied him. He
also went with Grilbert de Clare, earl of Gloucester
and Hereford, into Ireland, six years subsequently, on
an expedition of somewhat similar import.
The principal exploits of John de Hastings' were
exhibited in the wars between England and Scotland.
To the throne of the latter country he claimed a right.
Alexander IH., grandson of William the Lion, had an
only daughter, Margaret; who, in 1281, was married to
Eric, the young king of Norway. She had but one
daughter, also named Margaret, and distinguished by the
appellation of " the maiden of Norway.'* The latter, on
the death of her grandfather, in 1284, succeeded to die
crown of Scotland. As she was then a mere infont of
three years old, a regency was appointed. This young
queen died in 1290; and with her the direct royal line
of Scotland became extinct. Thirteen competitors laid
claim to the vacant throne. These were John Baliol,
lord of GaUoway; Robert Bruce, earl of Carrick and
Annandale; John Hastings; Eric, king of Norway;
Florence, count of Holland; John Cummin, earl of
Badenoch; Robert Dunbar, earl of March; William de
Vesey; Robert de Ross; Patrick Galyhtly; Robert de
Pinkeny; Nicholas de Soules ; and Roger de Mandevile.
The pretensions of the latter ten were too fiitile to
merit consideration; as in most cases they were merely
grounded on an illegitimate origin from the royal family.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 78
The contest, therefore, rested between Baliol, Bruce,
and Hastings, who were descended from David, earl of
Huntingdon. They referred their claims to Edward I.
Hie king, obUging them to renew the long acknow-
ledged but evaded feudal superiority of England over
Scotland, proceeded in his office as arbitrator. Hastings,
being descended from the youngest daughter, could only
assert his right to a third part of the kingdom as his
share. But as it was decided that Scotland could not
be separated into three distinct monarchies, his demand
was laid aside. Otherwise Tamwortli might have en-
joyed the proud distinction of forming part of the
possessions of two royal personages, — the kings of
England and Scodand. The competition thus remained
solely between John Baliol and Bobert Bruce. The
point of the dispute between them was, whether the
light of the latter as grandson of David, earl of Hun-
tingdon, by the second daughter, was not superior to
that of the former, who was great-grandson by the first
daughter. The enquiry lasted nearly two years; but,
on the 16th of November, 129S, it was terminated in
&vour of Baliol, to whom, without doubt, the throne
properly belonged. On the ensuing morning, he took
an oath of fealty to Edward ; and soon afterwards was
crowned at Scone with a tributary diadem.
John de Hastings, having possession of Tamworth and
Wigginton, claimed, in 1S9S, free warren, and the right
to all waifi and strays in these places. In the two
manors, he also demanded the privileges of gallows,
assize of bread and ale, pillory, tumbrell or cucking-
stool, and a court leet'
This nobleman submitted without reserve to the final
1 Eot 34, 01 de quo war., Si K. I : --Corporation Reooids.
L
74 TAMWORTH
sentence of Edward. In the subsequent attempts of the
Scotch to free themselves from the yoke of England^ he
afforded his aid, and continually took a very prominent
part. But in 1297, he was summoned, amongst many
others, to be present at London by the Sunday after
the octaves of the feast of St. John the Baptist; wel)
furnished with horse and arms, in order to attend
the king very shortly in a military expedition into
France. The design of this hostility was to regain the
province of Guienne, which the French monarch Philip
had seized, on account of the inhabitants having been
engaged with the English in some piratical excursions
against the Normans, in 1294. Edward had been dted,
as duke of Guienne, to answer for these matters. Being
very much occupied in Scotland at the time, he sent his
brother Edmund, earl of Lancaster, to Paris, who was,
however, unable to effect any amicable arrangement.
In 1297, the king, having completely subjected Scotland,
and, deposing John Baliol, annexed it to the English
crown, determined on an attempt to recover his foreign
territory. For this purpose, he did not march into
Guienne, but resolved to ravage France from the
Flemish border; and he accordingly landed at Sluys.
After eight months' waifiEure, attended with very trifling
success, he concluded a treaty with Philip, and returned
home in the following March.
Scarcely had John de Hastings arrived in England,
when his services were again required in Scotland. He
was ordered to resort to Carlisle, on the eve of Whit-
sunday, in order to advance into that kingdom, to aid in
suppressing the sudden and general revolt, of which sir
William Wallace was the principal leader. He con-
tinued in the Scottish wars during the five following
CASTLE AND TOWN. 75
yBais. There he performed military service for five
knights' fees^ in ISOO; and the next year, he served
onder Edward, prince of Wales. He was present at
the celebrated siege of the castle of Caerlaverock in
Dmnfiriesshire, in ISOS. The whole of Scotland was
again subdued. WaUace, being captured, was conducted
in triumph to London ; where, after a short trial, he was
executed for treason.
Soon after the taking of Caerlavertock, when the strife
in the north had nearly terminated, Henry de Hastings
was sent abroad into Grasooigne; but there he did not
remain very long. He had special summons, amongst
the nobility, to Westminster, in 1S06, on the morrow
after Tiinity-sunday, to take into consideration an order
concerning the aid for creating the king's eldest son
Edward a knight. The conferment of the honour of
knighthood upon the prince of Wales, was the prelude
to another descent upon Scotland. Robert Bruce,
grandson of the competitor in 1S90, was now in arms
to vindicate his claim to that throne. John de Hastings
had a grant from the king of all the county of Menteth
with the isles, and the whole of the lands and posses-
sions of Alan, earl of Menteth, who had rebelled against
the English. Edward I. died before his arrival in
Scotland. He besotight his son, as he dreaded his
malediction, not to inter his body, until he had totally
subdued the coimtry. The new monarch did not obey
the command of his father. He totally neglected the
Scottish affiurs for some time; and when at last he
marched to the north, the fatal battle of Bannock-
bum secured the national independence of the Scotch.
John de Hastings was summoned as a baron of the
teahns to the different parliaments from the SSrd of
76 TAMWORTH
June, 1295, to the 22nd of May, 1313. He was like-
wise seneschal of Aqnitaine. He was twice married. By
his first wife, Isabell, daughter of William de Valence,
and sister and coheiress of Aymer, earl of Pemfaroke, he
had three sons and three daughters. John succeeded
him; William and Henry died without issue. The
daughters were Elizabeth, married to Roger de Grrey
of Ruthyn, Joan, and Margaret. By his second wife
Isabell, daughter of Hugh Despencer, earl of Winches-
ter, he had two sons, Hugh of Gressing-hall, in
Norfolk, and Thomas.
At the time of his decease, in 1313, he held, amount
other estates, Wigginton, with a sixth part of Tamworth,
of the king, in capite, by service of the fourth part of
a knight's fee.^ The manor of Tamworth did not de-
scend with Wigginton to John, son of this elder John.
After passing, for a very brief space of time, to the
crown,' it was assigned to Isabell, the widow of John,'
for the term of her life, undoubtedly as a part of her
dowry. In her right, it was conveyed, about 1320, to
Ralph de Monthermer, earl of Gloucester and Hereford,
to whom she was married.'' But she was again sole
possessor in 1325; and she long survived her second
husband.' She must have died soon after the year
1334, when we find her mentioned, for the last tune.*
This side of Tamworth then passed to Lawrence de
Hastings, grandson of the first John.
John de Hastings, father of Lawrence, succeeded to
the greater part of the estates, when he was twenty-six
years of age.' He was the third baron of the fiunily,
being summoned to parliament firom the 26th of Novem-
1 InquU. 6 E. II :— Shad's Staffordsh. 9 Court rolls, 0 E. II. 3 lb., 7 £• H-
4 lb., 13, U B. II. A lb., 19 E. II. 0 lb., 8 K. III.
7 1nqttis.6E. II:*Shaw'iStaiford8h.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 77
ber, 1313, to the 20th of February, 1325, in which
year he died. He was continually engaged in active
service against the Scotch from 1310 to 1318; and he
was present when the English received the terrible de^
feat at Bannockbum, on the 24th of June, 1314, — a
blow to their pretensions, from which they were unable
to recover.
But in 1319, he was associated with the lords in
their insurrection to compel the king to banish the two
celebrated &vourites, the Despencers, whose imputed
pride and covetousness constituted the motives of
dislike. They were the &ther and brother of his
mother-in-law. Very soon, however, he deserted the
ranks of the discontented barons, and went over to the
king, at Cirencester, by whom he was again received
into confidence and &vour. He was, shortly afterwards
dispatched on a fruitless expedition into Scotland.
From whence having returned, he was, in 1322, con-
stituted governor of Kenilworth castle; and that office
he retained until his decease. He married Juliana,
grand-daughter and heiress of Thomas de Leyboume,
a baron of much note. By this lady he had an only
aon. She survived him, and afterwards had two hus-
bmds, Thomas le Blount, and William de Clinton.
In the latter person, was revived, in 1337, the title of
earl of Huntingdon, which had lain dormant since the
death of John Scott, a century previously.
Lawrence Hastings, at his fiither's demise, was only
five years old. His tuition was committed to his father-
in-law, William de Clinton; and he had the sum of
200 marks allowed to him annually out of the royal
exchequer. On attaining his majority, he was, by letters
patent dated on the 18th of October, 1339, created earl
78 TAMWORTH
of Pembroke. This title had become extinct on the death
of his grand-uncle Aymer de Valence. About the same
time, he was sent into Flanders to aid in the cause of
Edward III., who claimed the throne of France, in
right of his mother Isabell, daughter of Philip the Fair,
all the male descendants of whom were dead, except
the English king. According to the Salic law, no
female hand could wield that sceptre. Philip of Valois,
brother of Philip the Fair, was chosen by the French
peers. The decision gave great oflfenoe to Edward; and
he determined to enforce his daim by the sword.
In the following year, the king sunmioned the chief
of his nobility to attend him in his enterprise. Hearing
that a fleet of 200 ships lay prepared to intercept
him at Sluys, he sailed directly thither. There he
achieved the first great naval victory of England, in the
glory of which the earl of Pembroke participated.
Meeting with the enemy off the harbour of Sluys, about
ten o'clock on the morning after midsimmier-day, the
king grappled ship to ship and gave to the struggle
the characteristics of a land-combat. The battle was ob-
stinate and bloody. But in consequence of the English
occupying the windward, their archers conmiitted dreadful
havoc, insomuch that the French to avoid them leapt
into the sea, and attempted to swim to shore. The
whole of the fleet was taken or destroyed, and 30,000
of the enemy, it is said, were killed or drowned. The
next day, Edward entered the harbour of Sluys in
triumph.
The news of the terrible defeat was received at the
French court with great consternation. No one was
found to possess the moral courage or the rashness to
break the intelligence to Philip, and endure the first
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 79
ebuUition of royal anger. At last the court-fool, in the
absence of a bolder man, was induced, with much per-
suasion, to undertake the task. He went into the
presence of the sovereign, exclaiming: — " Cowardly
Englishmen, dastardly Englishmen, £unt-heaxted Eng-
Ushmen." The king's attention being, at last, attracted
by the continued repetition of the words, he demanded
of the jester what he meant. *^ They durst not leap
out of their ships into the sea, as our brave Frenchmen
did," — ^was the reply. Philip was inmiediately aware
that some very great misfortune had occurred to the
fleet. His attendants, after some hesitation, explained
the circumstances fully to him. The French attributed
their defeat to one of their commanders, Nicholas
Buchett, who had manned his ship with undisciplined
men, because they served for a much smaller payment
than knights or soldiers.
The earl of Pembroke was present at the siege of
Toumay; and he accompanied Edward in all his ex-
ploits, until the English returned to their own country,
in the same year.
In 1S41, he was again engaged on the continent to
assist Jane, countess of Montfort. This heroic lady, on
the imprisonment of her husband by Philip, on account
of a dispute concerning the dutchy of Bretagne, took up
arms to support her family and prevent its ruin. For
the purpose of carrying out her design, she implored
the aid of Edward. Closely besi^ed in Hennebon by
Charles de Blois, she was reduced to such straits, from
the want of fresh troops and the shattered condition, to
which the enemy had reduced the walls of the tow^i,
that her council proceeded so far as to insist on her
immediately surrendering. She entreated them to defer
80 TAMWORTH
only for a short time longer, and then, if no pros*
pect of aid appeared, she would jrield to them. Day
after day, she paced the ramparts, with her eyes
bent on the long line of waters towards the P^wglMli
coast The lonely warder was only interrupted by the
challenge of the sullen guard, or the complaints of the
people. But one day, whilst gazing on the ocean, and
listening to the remonstrances of her friends, she was
seen to start ; and a flush of gladness passed momenta-
rily over her countenance. There was, she Said, a misty
spot upon the bosom of the deep. It was invisible to
all save her quick and interested eye. After she had
remained silent in suspended hope, for some time, the
object became more apparent; and she exclaimed in
extreme joy : — ** Succours, the succours of England are
coming, — ^no surrender now." The news spread instantly
throughout the town ; and the inhabitants rushed to the
walls to watch the dark speck spread, divide, and at
last resolve itself into a fleet of many sail. After a
tedious voyage, caused by contrary winds, sir Walter
Manney, with a considerable force of knights and
soldiers, landed. They soon forced their way into
Hennebon, where they were right hospitably received,
and feasted in the castle.
Although the English were able to constrain Charles
de Blois to retire from the siege, their forces were
insufficient to afford much general assistance to the
countess. Four months after, Edward himself went
over with many nobles, among whom was the earl of
Pembroke; and an army of 12,000 men. But, in the
February following, a peace was concluded between the
kings, through the mediation of two cardinals, the
legates of pope Clement VI. As her cause had de-
CASTLE AND TOWN. 81
cHned, and was now nearly extinct, the countess was
preyailed upon to take refiige at the court of England.
She was consigned to the care of the chiyalrous Pem-
broke and others^ during her passage to London. Un-
suspicious that they would be compelled to defend
themselves in the yoyage, they embarked in a small
vesseL But when they were off the island of Guernsey,
they fell in with sir Loyes de Spain, the ally of Charles
de Blois. The shouts of the sailors first anneunced
to the passengers that he was bearing down upon them
with hostile intentions. All immediately flew to arms;
the countess even took up the sword, and fought with
the resolution of a knight. They had, indeed, need of
all the forces they could muster; for their opponents
were numerous. A fearfid combat ensued, in which all
parties exhibited their valour. The close of day caused
a cessation, and farther violation of the treaty by sir
Loyes. At midnight, a storm of so great violence arose,
that the English believed the day of judgment was at
hand. Providentially its only effect was to prevent a
renewal of the battle, by separating the combatants.
The eaxl and heroine were happy to escape on terms so
easy; and they afterwards landed in safety. Of her,
we hear no more ; for her cause became absorbed in the
interest which Edward's struggles for the crown of
France created.
During the remainder of his life, the earl of Pem-
broke was engaged in the wars abroad. He shared in
the splendid victories of Edward and the Black Prince,
which are so well known from the conmion histories of
our nation. He constantly gave proofs of his great
and untiring bravery. He married Agnes, daughter of
Roger Mortimer, earl of March. By her, he had an
M
82 TAMWOBTH
only son and heir, named John. He died on the day
after the decollation of St. John the Baptist, 1349,
probably of the plague, which then raged violently
throughout England, and cut off nearly half of its in-
habitants. He was only a little more than thirty years
of age. He then held, amongst other possessions, in his
demesne as of fee, the Staffordshire part of Tamworth,
for which was paid the accustomed rent of 5/.^
John de Hastings, second earl of Pembroke, was a
little more than a year old at his father's death. On
coming of age, in 1S69, he was despatched into France,
to aid in the fresh war, which had broken out with
England. There he manifested that he inherited a fuU
share of the chivalrous spirit of those days. At the
head of 300 knights and esquires he committed great
havoc in Anjou, and amassed very great spoils.
But it happened that, one day, whilst resting for the
evening at the village of Puirenon, he was suddenly
attacked by a troop of French, who rushed into the
place with their cry of '^ Our Lady of Sancerre, for the
marshall of France." Not being sufficiently vigilant, he
was unprepared for the onset. Most of his men were
killed or taken; and he lost the whole of his booty.
The earl and a few knights and archers saved them-
selves by a precipitate retreat into a preceptory of the
Templars. They immediately barricaded the place, de-
termined not to surrender so long as the most distant
hopes of escape remained. This brave resolution they
carried into ^ect ; and when the French attacked them,
they defended themselves with success, until night
closed in and gave them time to recruit their strength.
Aware that he could not hold out long, unless he re-
1 Inquis. aa E. Ill :— Corporation Records.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 88
ceived succour, the earl, whilst the French were asleep,
despatched an esquire to sir John Chandos, one of the
principal English commanders, at Poitiers. The mes-
senger lost his way in the dark.
At the dawn of day, the French renewed the attack
on the preceptory. They soon mounted the walls; but
the earl and his band fought with such determination
and fury, that the assailants were driven back: and
they dispersed themselves to collect mattocks and pikes,
in order to have recourse to the imknightly scheme of
unhousing the little band of English by breaking down
the waUs. Disappointed of the expected succour, the
earl, in the absence of the foes, summoned another
esquire and said to him : — ^^ Friend, take my courser,
go out at the back postern, ride direct to Poitiers, and
show sir John Chandos the state and danger that we
axe in. Commend me to him by this token and deliver
it to him, for he knows it well." At the same time, he
gave to the messenger the signet-ring from his finger.
About nine o'clock in the morning, the first esquire,
having regained his path, arrived at Poitiers. He
found Sir John at mass ; but he did not hesitate to
disturb his devotions. The knight was so offended at
the earl of Pembroke, that he refused to aid him, and
deliberately heard mass throughout. Whilst he was en-
gaged in his ablutions previously to dining, the second
messenger entered, tired, pale, and covered with dust,
and his steed in a foam from hard riding to avoid, cap-
ture by the pursuing enemy. Kneeling, he presented
the ring to sir John, saying, '^ Right dear sir, the earl
of Pembroke commends himself to you by this token,
and heartily desires your assistance to relieve him from
his present danger at Puirenon." Chandos took the
84 TAirWORTH
signet^ merely observing that if the earl were in so
great difficulties^ he could not assist him. He then
proceeded to dinner. But during the meal, he was
grave and silent; as were also his friends, who were
vexed at his resolution. In the middle of the second
course, he suddenly started up and said, — " Sirs, the
earl of Pembroke is a noble man, and of great lineage:
he is son of my natural lord, the king of England, for
he hath married his daughter, and in every thing he is
companion to the earl of Cambridge. He hath requested
me to go to him, and I ought to consent to his desire.''
He then left the table, crying ** Grallant knights, I will
ride to Puirenon." Every one rose and followed him;
and soon the trumpets summoned all to arms.
The earl of Pembroke still continued a successful
defence, even against the French mattocks. He had,
however, given up all hopes of relief. When on the
point of surrendering because of weariness and the
shortness of provisions, he espied the banners of his
friends, with more than two hundred spears, glittering on
the hills, in the rays of the evening sun. The French
saw them, too, and fled. The English then joyfrdly left
the village, and met the advancing droops about a league
distant. Aft^r keeping company for nine miles, Chandos
returned to Poitiers, and Pembroke went to Mortaigne.
Thus ended this singular adventure, so characteristic of
the bravery and spirit of the age of chivalry.
Iq 1371, the earl had to lament the death of his
friend, sir John Chandos, who was slain in the des-
perate battle near the bridge of Lusac. And subse-
quently he vntnessed, and unavoidably aided in, the
decline of the English cause in France, after the
decease of the Black Prince.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 85
He was made commander-in-chief of the English
forces in the principality of Aquitaine^ in 1272, when
he was only twenty-five years of age. In June of the
same year, he sailed with a fleet of forty ships for the
continent Kochelle was then closely besieged by the
French; and he determined to sail there to relieve his
countrymen. No sooner had he arrived at the harbour,
when he fell in with a powerful squadron, which was
sent to the assistance of the enemy by Don Henry,
king of Castile. Before he could completely arrange his
vessels in the line of battle, the Spaniards commenced
a furious onset The combat raged until the evening of
the ensuing day ; when the Spaniards gained a complete
victory, with comparatively little loss to themselves.
Their ships were larger than those of the English, and
possessed the novelty of being well armed with cannon,
by which great havoc was committed. All the earPs
vessels were lost, most of them being burned ; and the
whole of the royal treasure of 20,000 marks, with the
supplies intended for Edward's troops abroad, fell into
the hands of the Spaniards. The earl himself and all
his officers were made prisoners. This signal defeat
proved the ruin of Edward's cause in France. He was
unable to carry on the war with efficiency. Guienne,
Ponthieu, and the other provinces became an easy prey
to the constable of France; and finally very few places
remained in the hands of the English.
The earl of Ponbroke endured a long captivity in
Spain; and his fate was, for a long time, imknown.
At length, he contrived to send intelligence of his ex-
istence to Bertrand Clekyn, constable of France; who,
with the characteristic nobleness of the time, which
honoured valour even in an enemy, negociated, and at
length procured his release, for a large ransom. The
Ob TAMWOBTH
earl proceeded to Paris, in order to see his deliyeier.
From thence he directed his course towards England.
But before he reached Calais, he died so suddenly, that
suspicion was entertained of his having been poisoned.
This opinion, however, appears to have had little more
foundation than surmise. The Spaniards were absurdly
accused of having administered to him a fieital draught,
the operation of which they were able indefinitely to
regulate, until they had received the stipulated ransom.
The earl of Pembroke was a knight of the most
noble Order of the Garter. His decease took place on
the 16th of April, 1S75 ; and his body, belog conveyed
to England, was interred in the choir of the friar-
preachers' church at Hereford. He was the first Eng-
lish subject who followed the example of Edward IH.
in the quartering of arms. On his escutcheon, placed
upon the north side of that king's monument, in
Westminster abbey, are found — Or, a mandie Qui., for
Hastings ; Barry Arg. and Az., an orle of martlets 6u.,
for Valence. He married first Mai^aret Plantagenet,
fifth daughter of Edward HI., who was accounted one
of the most learned and accomplished ladies of the age,
and was the great patroness of the poet Chaucer. She
died without issue; and the earl took as his second
wife Ann, only daughter and heiress of sir Walter
Manney, K. 6. For this purpose, he obtained a special
papal dispensation, on account of the lady being related
to his first wife just within the d^ree of consanguinity,
prohibited by the strict ecclesiastical laws. She was
grand-daughter of Thomas de Brotherton, earl of Norfolk,
the uncle of Edward III. By her he had an only son,
John Hastings, third earl of Pembroke, who, at his
father's death, was an infant. His guardianship was
thereupon committed to his grand-mother Margaret,
CASTUa AND TOWN. 87
relict of sir Walter Manney.* At the coronation of
Richard II., on the 16th of June, 1377, being then
little more than four years of age, he asserted his right
to the honourable service of carrying the great golden
spurs. His claim was fully substantiated; but, on ac-
count of his youth, the office was assigned to Edmund
Mortimer, earl of March, as proxy, to whose daughter
the young earl was even then espoused.
In 1389, he attended the king during the time that
the court was celebrating the Christmas festivities at
Woodstock. There he met with an imtimely and me-
lancholy death, on the 30th of December, when he was
but seventeen years old. Whilst jousting with sir John
St John, he received, owing to an accidental slip of his
opponent's lance, a tremendous blow in the lower part
of the abdomen. Being so severely injured that the
intestines protruded fix>m the wound, he directly fell
from his horse. The alarmed attendants immediately
rushed to his assistance; but he expired almost directly
in the greatest agony, before he could be removed from
the spot. ' This unfortunate circumstance threw a deep
gloom over the whole court, and effectually put a stop
to the joyousness of the season; for he was highly es-
teemed by all, being a nobleman of very great promise,
and of an affable and generous disposition. He married
Philippa, daughter of Edmund Mortimer, third earl of
March; but he died childless, and with him the earl-
dom of Pembroke became extinct. He was buried in
the church of the Gbrey friars, near Newgate, in London,
now called Christ church. There his monument, of very
fiur and beautiful workmanship, stood, until it was
defaced in the religious revolution of the sixteenth
century.
1 CoQxt rolli» 19 R. n.
ARMS OF HASTINGS :«^R, a mancbi ocl.
DAYldI.,k.or8oots.
Robctt, portrere of lUitiiift,
Wftlter de Hasttncs, stewmrd of Hen. LsHMtewiae.
Hufh de HMtinKe, lord»Bnielmrfa, den. of Hugti*
of nUoficley, oo. Wanr. I niece end helreee of Sob.
de FUmvile
HeDi7» prince sAde, dan. Hen. MwrferT.sWQUem deslde, dan. Rich.
I
of Scotland, e.
of Hnnting.
I.
ofWni.,e.
of Wanen
ftSunrex.
dan. of
Rog. Btf •
ot,e. of
Norfolk.
Haednca,
■Coward of
Hen. II.
d. 1996.
of Hen.,
e.ofKa.
of Bar- deWf-
wellfC. fonL
Malcolm WUBam DaTld. e. of=Mand. slat, wmlamde
IV., k. of the Uon, Hnntincdon i of Ralph, S Hastinft,
ScoCa. kinc of and Canick e. of Chea- d. 199S.
Scot!. I ter. I
Margaret. sAlan,e. of laabcU
I Qalloway. sRob.
Bruce.
Hen.d. niomaa, pro-
llfK, geoitorofHaa.
a. p. tinge, earla at
Hoiittogdoo.
I I I I I
Hen. David. John Scott, last e. ADA.sHaNBT ds
a.p. s.p. ofaie8ler,d.l937. | HAarinroe,
a.p. d. 1250.
I i i r
Deryor-=JohnBa- Helene Roger Qoinci, Cbriatlana. HairaT Da= Joan, list, and
gille.
UoUe.of
GaUowny.
I e. of Wlnchea-
ter.
s Will. e. of BASTivoa,
John
I
r
d. 1908.
Maxg. IwaAtSL Helen. Iiabell,3jonir DB3laABstL,sRALFi
heireea of Geo.
deCantiiape,
lafldofAbefgn-
vcnny.
BaU.
ol,k. e. Per. Com-
of reraft inin,a.
Boota. Derby, of
tMuk aiat.ft
lord coh.of
ZoodL Aymer
deVal-
•nce,e.
of Pen*
broke.
HAav-
urea, of
Aberga-
venny,
9baron
Haat-
inga,
d. ISIS.
', Bdm. Andry.
. Bdw.L
of DB a ba- Lama. k. of
Hugh Mont- roo
Deepen- bbb-
OCT, e. of MBB,
Winchea- e. of
ter. «oac.
&Heref.
a. p.
Roger:
Moit.
=rsr
Johnde
Haa^
imer.
ofWilL
iage,S
le.of
Mon-
baron
Marc.
tagne.
Haat.
d.lSM
eTof
in**.
Salia-
d. 1995.
bury.
J i 1 I I I 1
. WUL, Blisab. Joan, Hugh, Hio. Edw. Tho.
d.andh. Hen. =:Rog. Maig. of II. k. of
ofTho. ■.». lord Graea- of Bro-
deLey- Grey of Ingball, . Eng- thcr-
ban,n RhUp co.ef
9, Tho.
laBloont,
=:S,WIU.
lyn
Noif.
e. of Hon-
tinfcdon.
e.of
Nor-
folk.
I
d.y.p. aBTho.Bean- d. 9Sth
champ, e. of of July,
Warwick. 1S5S.
Agnea.=LAWBBNCB DB Kdwardlll., Sir Walters Margaret,
HAeriwoa, ere- k. of Bng-
ated e. of Fern- land,
broke, d. 1340. |
Manney,
K.G.
I
Roger MortlnMr,
9e. ofMarch«
■, Uonel,(l
-1 I
, d. of Margarets John HAenwoa, K. G.
Caarencc. naniage- 1 9nd e. of Pembroke,
I net, l8t I d. 1375.
wife. a.p.
ofNocf.
Rdm. Mortimer, 9 e. of March.
sPhiUppa.
Ann, 9nd wife; d.
on Palmeonday,
1384.
Roger Mortimer,
5 e. of March.
Bdmund.
sAdan.
of Owen
Glendower.
John. Elitabeth.
I
B Henry
Hotspur.
Philippe, 9 Rich. = John Hastings,
fitz Alen, e. of I 3 and last e. of
Arundel. =3 John Pembroke, slain
St. John. I in 1389.
B.P.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 89
On the death of the last earl of Pembroke, his
estates passed to his next heir, Beginald, lord Grey of
Bttthyn, grandson of Roger, who, as we before said,
married Elizabeth, daughter of John, second baron
Hastings. Amongst them, Wigginton was included;
though such was not the case with Tamworth. The
moiety returned again into the immediate possession of
the crown; where it ever after remained.' And here
we leave the Staffordshire side of the town, to give the
history of that part in the county of Warwick.
From the time of the conquest nearly to the close
of Henry Illrd's reign, the Warwickshire side of Tam-
worth continued in the immediate possession of the
crown. For it, were rendered the aids, which we haye
before specified; and, in 1236, the annual fee*&rm rent
amounted to 4/. 16«.' But in 1266, the king granted
it, with all the royal demesnes in the other part of the
town and Wigginton, to Philip de Marmyon, lord of
the Castle, at a yearly rent of 34/. 6g. 9d. After the
restoration of that portion belonging to the Hastings'
fimiily, he still retained this mmety, and held it until
his death in 1291. It then returned into the hands of
the king.'
Edward II., in 1317, bestowed it upon Baldwin Freyile,
during the royal pleasure, for the old accustomed sum
of 4/. 168.
The lease to Frevile very soon expired ; for the king,
in the next year, gave this part of the town to the
inhabitants, under the title of men and tenants, their
heirs and successors for ever; with all liberties, free
1 Oomt rolto, 18 R. II. } 91, 29, H. VI.
1 Thi& accfmiit of the Warwickshire part is derived from Dngdale's history of the
covDty, except where other anthorities ai« mentioned.
3 Court rolls, IS, so E. I.
90 TAMWORTH
cufitoms, commodities, profits, easements, and others
belonging to it, which they and their ancestors had
reasonably held. A reservation was made of the ancient
rent, with 20«. increase, and of tallage, aids, and other
customs usually paid to the crown in past times.' This
grant subsequently leceiyed confirmation firom every king
down to the time of Edward IV. Thus we have the
letters patent of Edward III., dated in 13S1 ; of Richard
II., in 1877; of Henry IV., in 1400; of Henry V., in
1414; of Henry VI, in 1488; and of Edward IV.,
in 1467.«
In 1817, the inhabitants obtained royal licence to take
toll for all commodities brought here for sale, a half-
penny for every quarter of wheat, &c., during the space
of three years, to defray the expences of paving the
town. At the expiration of the specified time, in 1820,
the licence was renewed for a similar term. But it
would appear that the profits of the toUs were insuf-
ficient for the completion of the design; as grants, for
the same purpose, were made by Edward II., in 1825,
and by his successor in 1828, 1886, and 1841.
Besides these concessions for the improvement of the
moiety, the inhabitants, in 1887, obtained a charter
fit)m Edward HI., empowering them to establish two
annual fidrs, one to be held on the feast of St. Greorge
the Martyr, the other on that of St. Edward the
Confessor, with the usual courts of pie-poudre; and
both to continue for three days afterwards. And in
1441, another patent was granted for taking toll of all
vendible articles, during the four ensuing years, towards
the completion of the pavement, and the repair of
Bolebridge.
1 Ptt. 4 B. III., per iDtpeximiu :— Corpoimtion Records,
fl Oorporatloii Reoorcto.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 91
We find that on the Ist of July, 1609, the fee-farm
rent of 5/. 168. was, amongst others, assigned for life
as a part of the portion of the unfortunate but noble-
minded and virtuous Catherine of Arragon, the first
consort of Henry YIII. To her it was paid in half-yearly
sums at Michaelmas and Easter. She enjoyed it until
the period when the pride of the king, aroused at the
probability of his family fidling in the male line, and
the smiles and blandishments of a fairer rival, led to
her divorce. The payment then, on the Slst of March,
16S3-4, passed to the second wife of the king, Ann
Boleyn. But when she too was supplanted by the
arts which she had employed, and had terminated her
short career by a mournful death, it passed to Jane
Seymour, third wife of Henry. This lady held it until
her decease, on the birth of a son, afterwards Edward YI.
In 15S7, the rent returned to the crown, and rested
there.'
Having now spoken of each separate side of the town,
we must return to the history of Tamworth generally.
From the reign of Richard II., to the commencement
of that of Elizabeth, very few incidents occur of par-
ticular interest. We can trace little, except such cir-
cumstances as are almost necessarily connected with the
bare existence of the place. Situated in the very midst
of the kingdom, £Eur removed firom the precincts of the
court, and firom the busy strife of political movements,
it continued in its wonted peaceful state, undisturbed
and almost unobserved. Yet in one or two instances,
the town emerged firom its general obscurity to obtain
some degree of celebrity throughout the coimtry. On
the first occasion, it comes before our notice in a more
1 AGqatttanon, temp. H. VIII :— Corporatioii Records.
92 TAmVOftTH
^TniiBing manner than perhaps the whole history of
other places could present^ whose names rank higher
in the annals of our country. In the reign of Edward
rV., an incident is said to have occurred, which has
afforded the subject of a long ballad of very great fiime
in olden times, entitled '' King Edward and the Tanner
of Tamworth." It arose from the circumstance of the
king's meeting, in an hunting excursion, a tanner,
whose homeliness was made the butt of royal wit
The poor man, mistaking his majesty for a robber,
afforded him much amusement; but he was wril re-
warded in the end. We will, however, aUow the quaint
rhymes of our merry foie£EiiherB to relate the tale. Those
of our readers who are acquainted wi& the locality, wiH
at once recc^niae the place of meeting to have been on
the recently enclosed heath, between Sutton Goldfield
and Basset's pole; firom whence the tanner must have
been journeying to Tamworth.
In summer time, when leaves grow greene,
And blossoms bedoeke the tree,
King Edward wolde a hunting ryde.
Some pastime Ibr to see.
With hawke and hovnde, he made him bowne,'
With home, and eke with bowe ;
To Drayton Basset he tooke his waye,
With aU his lordes a rowe.
And he had ridden ore dale and downs,
By eight of clocke in the day.
When he was ware of a boM tanner
Come ryding along the waye.
A iayre russet coat the tanner had on,
Fast buttoned under his chin.
And under him a good cow-hide.
And a mare of four shilling.
" Nowe stand you still, my good lordes all.
Under the grene wood spraye;
And I will wend to yonder fellowe,
To weet< what he will saye.
1 i. e. ready. s i. e. to know.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 98
God gpeede, God speede thee," laid our long,
" Thoa art welcome, lir/' sajd hee :
" Tlie readyest waje to Drayton Baaset,
I praye thee to ihowe to mee/'
« To Drayton Baiiet woldst thoa goe,
Fro the place iriiere tiios dost itaiid ?
The next payre of gallowea thoa comeat onto,
Tome in upon thy right hand.''
" That ia an nnreadye waye," aayd oar king,
<* Thoa doeit bat jest I aee:
Nowe shewe me oat the neareat waye,
And I pray thee wend with mee.**
** Awaye witii a vengeanoe I" qaotii the tanner :
"IhoUtheeootoftfaywIttt
All daye have I rydden on Brocke my mare,
And I am fiurting yett."
*< Go with me downe to Drayton Baiaet,
No dayntiea we will fpare ;
All daye shalt thoa eate and drinke of the best,
And I wia paye thy hn."
** Grramereye Ibr nothing," the tanner replyde,
** Thoa payeat no Ikre of mine :
I trowe I're more nobles in my parse.
Than thoa hast pence in thine."
•* God give thee joy of diem,*' sayd the king,
"And send them well to pridb."
The tanner wolde fidne hare beene away,
Fdr he weende^ he had beene a tfaiefe.
" What art thoa," hee sayde, *' thoa fine fellowe.
Of thee I am in great feare.
For the doathes, thoa wearest apon thy baoke,
Bfigfat beseeme a lord to weare.'*
** I nerer stole them," qnoth oar king,
" I tell yoa, sir, by the roode."
** Then thoa playest as many an onthrift doth,
And standest in midds of thy goode."
" What tydinges heare yoa," sayd the kynge,
*' As yoa ryde larre and neare ?"
'* I heare no tydinges, sir, by the masse.
Bat that cowe-hides are deare."
'* Cowe-hidesl cowe-hidesl wlmt things are those?
I marreU what they bee?"
" What art thoa a Ibole ?" tiie tanner reply'd ;
" I carry one onder mee.'*
" What eraftnnan art thoa," ssid the king,
'* I praye thee tell me tiowe."
1 i.e.
94 TAMWORTH
'* I am a barker, air, by my trade ;
Nowe tell me wbat art thoa ?"
*' I am a poore coartier, air,*' qaoth he,
" That am forth of aenrice wome ;
And fiune I wolde thy prentiae bee.
Thy cuminge for to feame."
*' Marrye heaTen forefead,"! the tanner leplyde,
** That thoa my prentiae were :
Thoa woldat apend more good than I ihold winne
By fortye shilling a yeare."
" Yet one thinge wolde I,** aayd oar king,
** If thoa wilt not aeeme atrange,
Thoaghe my hone be better than thy mare,
Yet with tiiee I fidne wolde change/*
" Why if witfi me thoa fiune wilt diaqge,
Aa change fdl well maye wee,
By the tuSi of my bodye, tiioa proade idlowe,
I will have aome boot of thee/'
'' That were against reason,** aayd the king,
" I Bweare, so mote I thee :*
My horae ia better than thy mare,
And that thoa well mayst aee.**
'* Yea, air, bat Brooke ia gentle and mild,
And softly she will five:
Thy horse ia onrolye and wild, I wiss;
Aye skipping here and theare."
** What boote wiU thoa haTC ?" oar king reply'd ;
•< Now teU me in thia stoonde.**
'* Noe penoe, nor half pence, by my fiiye.
Bat a noble in gold ao roond."
** Here's twentye groatea of white moneye,
Sith tiiott wilt haTe it of mee."
** I woold have awome now," qaoth the tanner,
*' Thoa hadst not had one pennie.
Bat aince we two haye made a change,
A change we must abide.
Although thou hast gotten Brooke my mare.
Thou gettest not my oowe-hide."
'* I will not have it," sayd the kynge,
** I sweare, so mought I thee ;
Thy fottle cowe-hide I wolde not beare,
If thou woldst giye it to mee."
The tanner hee tooke hia good oowe-hide.
That of the cow was hilt;
And threwe it upon the king'a sadelle,
That was soe fayrelye gilte.
1 i. e. forbid. 9 So might I thrive :-« kind of oath.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 96
" Now help me up, thou fine fellowe,
'TU time that I were gone :
When I come home to Gyllian my wife,
Shed say I am a gentilmon."
The king he tooke him np by the legge ;
The tanner a f*** lettfaU. .
'* Now, marrye, good fellowe," sayd the kyng,
'< Thy oonrtesye is but smalL"
When the tanner he was in the ktnges sadeUe,
And his foote in the stimip was ;
He marreUed greatlye in his minde,
Whether it were golde or brass.
Bat when his steede saw the cow's taile wagge,
And eke the blacke cowe-bome ;
He stamped, and stared, and awaye he ranne,
As the devill had liim borne.
The tanner he pnild, the tanner he sweat,
And held by the pnmmil fast :
At length the tanner came tumbling downe ;
His necke he had weU*nye brast.
*' Take thy horse again," with a yengeance he sayd,
" With me he shall not byde."
" My horse wolde have borne thee well enoughe.
But he knewe not of thy cowe*hide.
Yet if againe tiion fahie woldst change.
As change ftill well may weci
By the fidth of my bodye, thou jolly tanner,
I will haye some boote of thee."
** What boote wilt thon haye," the tanner replyd,
" Now tell me in this stonnde ?"
** Noe pence, nor half pence, sir, by my faye,
Bat I will haye twentye poand."
" Here's twentye groates oat of my parse ;
And twentye I haye of thine :
And I haye one more, which we will spend
Together at the wine."
The king set a bogle home to his moathe.
And blewe both loade and shrille :
And soone came lords, and soone came knights,
Fast ryding oyer the hille.
** Nowe, oat alas 1 " the tanner he cryde,
" That eyer I saw this daye 1
Thoa art a strong thiefe, yon come thy feUowes
WHl beare my cowe-hide away.**
'* They are no thieyes,'* the king replyde,
'* I sweare, soe mote I thee :
Bat they are the lords of the north coontrey,
Here come to hant with mee.*'
96 TAMWORTH
And looDe before our king they came,
And knelt downe on the gronnde :
Then might the turner haye beene awaye,
He had le?er than twentye ponnde*
" A coUer, a ooller here," aajd the kii«.
A collar he load gan crye :
Then wolde he lever then twentye poond,
He bad not beene ao nighe.
" A ooller, a ooller/' the tanner he eayd,
** I tfowa it will breed lorrowe :
After a ooUer oommeth a halter,
I trow 1 shall be hang'd to-morrowe.
" Be not afraid Tanner," said our king ;
*' I tell thee, so mooght I thee,
Lo here I make thee the beat eaqoire
That b in the north oonntrie.
For Plumpton-parke I will give thee,
With tenemenU faire beside:
*Tis worth three hundred markea by the yeare.
To mainuine thy good oowe-hide."
*' Grsmercye, my liege," the tanner replyde,
" For the fSsTOor iStoa bait me ahowne ;
If ever thon oomest to merry Tamworth,
Neatest leader shall doat thy shoen.< "
1 i.e.oow*s 9 Ferer'sBellQttBsofanGlaitBogllsh poetry.
Y Tliflra appear to have been aereral slight variatkNis fai dtftrent copies of the
baUad. For histanoe, the author of the " Art of SofUdi poesle,'* IftSff. qaodnc the
tennlnatiiig line of the fourth ytnt from the end, as an example of the Tidoos mode
of speech, called by the Greeks, Acraoir, makes the tanner exclaim in his fright at
the liberties which he had taken with the sorereign, " I hope I shall be hanged to-
morrow,'* meaning, *' I am afraid I shall be hanged,**-« periaishm of language not
entirely extinct among the lower orders at thepresent day. Again, the next Terse is
rsstored from 8elden*s *' Titles of Honoor.** Ims celebrated author brings forward
the ballad as no contemptible authority to show that one mode of creating esquires, at
the time, was by the tanpositlon of a coUari for it is worthy of notioe that no doubt has
crer been expressed of ttM actual occurence of ttie adventure between the Ung and the
tanner, or of the correctness of the popular relation. In other places, the vcne ran
^^ '-' Awayv with thy ttm*, dm JeOy namr.
For the BMrt thoa hut •hown to me,
I w«MB DM haltiT than ■hah wwve,
Bot dieo dudt ham • halKhfs fM.
This seems to have been a later version; and is, in (act, far from being correct. Percy,
before he met with the amendment in Selden's work, believed that the tanner wan cre-
ated a knight, and that the rustic mistook the word '* acolade" for ** a collar;'* or that
the imposition of a collar was the only ceremony needed. But these coi^ectures are
wrong. A collar was really demanded ; and knighthood could only be conferred by
giving the acolade, or blow with the sword, which is not directly stated to have been
adopted on this occasion.
It is, hideed. faicredible, that the king should have admitted into the rank of knights,
then so esteemed and honoured, an ignorant and boorish tanner. The title of esquire
was certainly the highest which he could have bestowed. It was left for sovereinu
subsequently to ttie rei^n of Blicabeth to degrade the sword of knighthood by laying
it, almost vrithout dlscriminatian, upon those alike unfitted in station and persooal
qualitiea. Some other better and more suimble means of reward mig^t surely be de-
vised for those whose only vreapon was the goose-quill, or whose greatest nat the
presentation of a loyal address. Then the once dignified institntion of knights might
be confined within its legitimate and proper limits, and oonstitnte a mark of distinctkm
in the army for bravery, or at least in such cases, where deeds of prowess and tntre-
pidity have been achieved. But truly the age of chivalry is fied, and its honours
prostrated in the dust.
GENERAL HISTORY:
CONTINUED.
In the time of Richard III.^ Tamworth again became
a place of notoriety. Henry^ earl of Richmond^ with
his forces, passed through it on his way to Bosworth,
where he was about to encounter the army of the king.
To the throne of England, Richmond had been in-
duced to aspire, by the promises of support which he
leceiyed from the numerous and powerful adherents of
the house of Lancaster, who were discontented at see-
ing one of the opposite fietction of York in possession of
the regal authority. On account of his intrigues, he
had been compelled to quit the coimtry; but, after
a short time, his party having increased, he determi-
ned to prosecute his ambitious schemes with the sword.
For this purpose, on the 1st of August, 1485, Henry
embarked for England at Harfleet, in Normandy, with
about S,000 troops, in a few ships. Directing his
course towards Wales, after seven days' sail, he arrived
at Milford-Haven ; where he landed. It had been his
first intention to direct his course to London, and
attempt to seize the capital at once. But now, hear-
ing that Richard was in the north, he changed his
plans, and resolved to meet the king, in order by one
great blow to decide the fortimes of the war. He
marched to Shrewsbury, and afterwards to Stafford.
0
98 TAMWORTH
From thence he proceeded to Lichfield. His forces,
during the whole time, received continual augmentation
by desertions from the party of Richard.
Breaking up his camp at Lichfield, the earl of Rich-
mond, on the 18th of August, sent forwards his troops
to Tamworth. He, himself, followed with a body-guard
of twenty light-horsemen. Midway between the two
places, he was met by sir Walter Hungerford and sir
Thomas Bourchier, knights, with many others. They
had secretly quitted the royal army, a little beyond
Stoney-Stratford ; and fled, under the cover of night,
by unfirequented and circuitous paths, until they en-
countered the earl. After a few words of courtesy and
kindness, Richmond sent on his new allies to join the
rest of the company. Falling into a fit of deep ab-
straction, whilst musing on his fortunes and reflecting
on his hazardous enterprize, he lingered so far behind
his troops that he entirely lost sight of them; and
they arrived at Tamworth without him. It was then
simset; and, night rapidly closing in, he missed his way,
perhaps at Coton, near Hopwas. After wandering for
some time, he came to a little viUage about three miles
distant, probably Elford. Fearing that he might fall
into the hands of Richard's scouts who were spread
throughout the whole country, and alarmed at the re-
port which he had heard of the king's arrival in the
immediate neighbourhood, he dared not address any
person to ask for a guide or enquire the direction of
the town. He was, therefore, compelled to dismount
and conceal himself as well as he could. Every mo-
ment, afiraid that his horse should betray him, dreading
the slightest sound, and frequently imagining that some
foe was approaching, he spent the night in anxious
watchfulness and perturbation.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 99
The first faint glimmerings in the east^ which an-
nounced the dawn of day^ must have been joyfully
welcomed by Richmond. When the light had sufficiently
increased, he re-mounted his horse. Fortunately dis-
covering the town, he arrived there in safety to the
great satisfaction of his followers. Amongst them, his
unexpected absence had caused much wonderment and
consternation.
Henry considered it impolitic to confess the truth, lest
his accident might damp the ardour of the soldiery.
He, therefore, stated that he had been to an appointed
place, and had received favourable intelligence firom
some of his secret friends. After his accession to the
throne, he first gave a true account of this singular
adventure.^
After riding publicly through the streets of Tam-
worth that his safety might be well known, and his
troops reanimated by his presence, he again left them
and went to Atherstone. There, in a small and retired
field, he conferred with lord Stanley, his father-in-law,
and sir William Stanley, concerning the measures neces-
sary to be adopted in the impending battle.* Although
1 Sach is the oommonly-reeeiTed TeraioD of RiclimoDd*8 snppoted stnmse and
pcriloDS adTcntaie, in his march from Lichfield to Tunworth, on the eyening of Thun-
imf, Anput 18, 1485. Bot it will not, we think, be dUHcnlt to shew that Richmond most
probablf deriatcd from his path for the express purpose of secretly conferring with
sooM frtenda of his cause, or Tisiting his mother, or other members of the Stanley
tuoUj : and that he spent the night either at Whittington, or Elford, then the property
and occasional residence of the Stanleys. This view of the snl^ect receives some
conoboration frxnn the statement given by Richmond himself, of the canse of his
portentous afaeence, on the morning of his arrival at Tamworth. The Author's Father,
who has paid some attention to this cnrions and interesting point of historical research,
has pronndsed to concentrate in a note, all the information which he possesses, or here-
after may be enabled to collect, on tiie sataject. The result of his investigations will
be given in tlie appendix.
9 This memorable interview is stated by Hntton— Battlb of BoswoaTH-FisLD,
p. 59-492.— to have taken place on the night of Saturday, August SO, in a UtUe field
eaUedthe *HaU.Close,' "situated one hundred yards behind the Three Tons, Joining
the Coieshill road on the left, through which the canal now passes.** It is, moreover,
somewhat looedy intimated by the same writer that " Henry slept one night at least"
at the said Inn, which formed his headquarters. If this statement be ooirect. Miss
Strickland's account of Richmond having lost his way on the night of the 20th, upon
AtherstODe-moor in returning frxnn his Interview with the Stanleys, must be utterly
destitnte of fbnndatlon. Vrom what source, the highly-gifted and generally accurate
histofian of " the Queens of England" derived her materials for this very improbable
story, we are at a loss to conceive. The writers, to whose authority she refers— Speed,
Rapfai, and Hvtton at least— do not, in the most distant manner, advert to it.
534864
100 TAMWORTH
a secret friend and adviser, the former had not yet
openly advocated Richmond's cause. Richard had re-
tained lord Strange, as an hostage for the fidelity of
his father; and had treason been suspected, the son
would at once have been sacrificed. But in the battle,
Stanley took the side which his paternal aflbction had
prevented him from previously acknowledging.
On the evening of the same day, Richmond was
joined by sir John Savage, sir Brian Sandford, and
sir Simon Digby. They had deserted with their friends
and followers, from Richard's party, then vnth him at
Leicester. Having returned to Tamworth, the earl
marched thence with all his forces to encounter the
army of the king: and the two rivals met in the neigh*
bourhood of Market-Bosworth, in Leicestershire. On
Monday, the 22nd of August, the battle was fought
Richard, who, whatever may be the crimes laid to his
charge, was a brave and accomplished soldier, displayed
his courage in a remarkable manner. Discontent and
treachery, however, were rife amongst his troops. His
army was defeated, and he, himself, slain in the thickest
of the fight. The battle thus decided, the army of
Richmond sang the Te Deum. Clapping their hands,
they saluted him with the title of Henry VH. And
the crown of Richard was placed by lord Stanley on
the head of the conqueror.*
The connection of Tamworth with the history of the
nation, at the translation of the sceptre fit)m the house
of York to that of Lancaster has not escaped the notice
of the mighty bard of the Avon. By his pen, the town
has been recorded in the immortal page, which would
1 Hall's Uuion.^HoliuBhcd's Chronicles of England, &c.
TOWN AND CASTLE. 101
transmit its memory, even if the place of its existence
should be forgotten. In the play of Richard III., one of
the most celebrated of his historical tragedies, a scene
of the fifth act is laid in a plain near Tamworth.
There Richmond is represented as thus addressing his
followers, to inflame their minds, and urge them on,
with greater boldness to the battle-field.
" FellowB in armfl, and my most loving friends,
Bniia'd nndemeath the yoke of tyranny,
Thus far into the bowels of the land
Have we march'd on without impediment;
And here receive we from our fiither Stanley
Lines of fidr comfort and encouragement.
The wretched, bloody, and nsorping boar,
That spoil'd your summer fields and fraitM vines,
Swills yoor warm blood like vrash, and makes his trough
In your embowell'd bosoms, this fonl swine
Lies now even in the centre of this isle,
Near to the town of Leioester, as we learn :
From Tunworth thither is bnt one day's march.
In God's name, cheerly on, conrageons friends,
To reap the harvest of perpetnal peace
By this one bloody trial of sharp war.''
Shakespeare, in designating Richard III. as a wild
boar, has given him the opprobrious appellation, by
which he was often distinguished amongst his adversaries,
and the firiends of Richmond. The name was first
suggested by the king's having a hog for one of the
supporters of his arms. In 1484, William CoUingbume,
of Lydiard, in Wiltshire, was hanged, drawn, and quar*
tered, for high treason, in aiding the cause of the earl,
and vniting the following satirical distich upon the
king and the three royal favourites, lord viscount Level,
sir Richard Ratcliffe, and sir William Catesby.
" The cat, the rat, and Lovel the dog,
Rule all England under a hog.'**
1 HoUnBbed.
102 TAMWORTH
Until the period when Eliasabeth re-incorporated the
town> Tamworth was placed under two distinct and
independent, but similarly constituted, governments, for
the two sides. Each of them consisted of two high-
bailiflb, one low-bailiff, two tasters or victual«conners,
and two chamberlains. There were, besides, a constable
or head-borough, and numerous watchmen. We also
find that, at a very early period, there existed a high
and a low-steward.
In the high-bailifSs, the government of the town was
wholly vested; and, as in other places, they presided
over the courts. They were elected every year, generally,
although not invariably, on the first Monday in July.
The oldest names, which we have yet found, are those
of William Taylor and Adam Palmer, on the Warwick-
shire side, about 1245. They were witnesses of a grant
of several parts of burgages in the town, by William
de Blackreeve to Philip de Marmyon, for 80s. paid by
his wife, lady Joan. Of the names of many more, we
have collected a list, down to the time of Edward
YI., chiefly firom the court-rolls of the town, and firom
amongst the witnesses of deeds. In one or two instan-
ces, the days of election have been discovered firom the
former source.^
There is very little worthy of remark concerning
these officers, except a few bye-laws for their regula-
tion. On the 20th of October, 1422, it was ordered
that none should serve in the office, for more than one
year.' In 1436, it seems to have been necessary to
restrain their combative dispositions by a very heavy fine;
for, on the 10th of July, it was ordained that any one of
them, who should make an affiray in another borough,
1 S«e Appendix :~Note 2. 2 Court rolls, i H. VI.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 103
or assault any man in his own^ except in self-defence^
should pay 40«.^ half to go to the common box of the
town^ and half to the benefit of the Church.^ Richard
III. charged the bailifis and commonality no longer to
pay regard to the custom of choosing them out of their
burgesses and freeholders^ but to respect the sufficiency
of persons' goods alone. The document was dated at
Nottingham, on the 12th of October, 1484.'
The low-bailiff was appointed annually soon after the
high-bailiffi, apparently on no particular day. His
office seems to have been to summon parties to the
courts, and transact other similar business, under the
direction of the superior officers. The names of several
occur in the court-rolls of the town.'
The two tasters were also chosen annually, the precise
day being varied according to convenience or necessity:
and they took an oath to perform the duties with fidelity.
Their office was to supervise all ale, wine, and food of
every kind, exposed for sale ; also all weights and mea-
sures, and to report at the court-leet whatever they
considered as bad or suspicious, for adjudication.^
To the chamberlains, the charge of all the public
pecuniary transactions was committed. The date of
their appointment was also imcertain.'
Of the constable or head-borough it is needless to say
anything. The names of some, in ancient times, have
been preserved.'
The town, during the night, must have been very
strictly guarded ; for the watchmen were numerous. The
inhabitants seem to have been obliged often to take
the duty upon themselves, or to find so^ie substitute.
1 CoartroUs, HH.VI. s lUrlMnM.S.
3 See Appendiz :— Note 3. 4 See Appendix:— Note 4.
ft See Appendix:— Notes. 0 See Appendix :— Note 0.
104 TAMWORTH
There are many old bye-laws for their regulation,
some of which are rather curious. May SOth, 1S79 : —
Any person not prepared, at the summons of the bai-
liflEs, to watch, and that fiiithfully, from the setting to
the rising of the sun, according to the usual custom
of the town, should incur a penalty of 4d. tot every
omission. May SOth, 1390: — ^If the men ordained to
watch, should sculk under the waUs of the houses, or
behave iU, they should be fined 40d. And it was fur-
ther ordered that every burgess of the town should send
one able man to keep guard, or pay 40d. tor each
de&ult May 12th, 1422: — ^Any one assaulting the
watchmen of the lord king should pay 20«., half to go
to the bailiffs, and half to the town-box. April 28th,
1547: — No watchman should be in his house after the
hour of nine at night, otherwise he should pay 6<. 8d.^
Although it was esteemed the most honourable of all,
we have reserved until last the office of high-steward, be-
cause its duties were little more than nominal, and only
called into exercise on particular occasions and emer-
gencies. It was usually given to some nobleman or
person of rank in the neighbourhood ; who generally had
a representative or low-steward in the town. The
creation of the high-stewardship has always been at-
tributed to queen Elizabeth. This opinion is, however,
very erroneous. The first time we have yet seen it
alluded to, is in May, 1382, when William de Caldewell,
and William Wirley, baker, on admission to the freedom
of the town, took the required oath before Richard
Wolf, " tunc loco seneschalli," and the bailiffs of the
Staffordshire ^de. Each of them paid half a mark,
" according to ancient custom." On the other side of
1 Court rolls, StaJVontalilre, 9, is R. 1I.| lo H. v.; i K. VI.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 105
the town, on the 12th of June, 1420, Richard Caldewell
was made firee in the presence of Richard Hilton, stew-
ard, and the bailiffs. And again, in Staffordahire, on the
SSrd of August, 1452, John Breton, of Lichfield, was
admitted to the liberty of the town and sworn before
the steward.^
This high appointment was held by sir John Ferrers,
knt., lord of the Castle. It appears to have been pre-
viously enjoyed by some of his ancestors. He died in
1512; and was succeeded by his son Humphry; to
whom a grant of the office was made under the great
seal of England. The latter, in the exercise of his
duties, appears either to have overstepped the bounds
of prudence and legitimate authority, or to have excited
the anger of those, against whom his power was exerted.
There were many charges of assault upon different per-
sons preferred against him, all in connexion with the
stewardship. On these matters, however, we have only
seen his general answers ; we cannot consequently state
the predse nature or extent of the accusations brought
against him.'
John Ferrers succeeded his father in this office. After
his decease, in April, 1576, it was bestowed on Humphry
Ferrers, both by the crown, and by the corporation of
the town, in the January following.' With him we shall
leave the subject at present, to resume it hereafter.
We have thus brought the general history of Tam-
worth down to the end of the reign of Philip and
Mary. We must now speak of the modified form of
government, under which Elisabeth placed the town^ by
ktters-patent dated on the 24th of December, 1560.
1 Court rollB, 5 R. II., 7 H. V., 90 H. VI.
a See Appendix:— Note 7. 3 Corporation Records.
106 TAMWORTU
The charter commenced by reciting that Tamworth
was an ancient market-town: and the inhabitants^ by
the name of bailiffs and commonalty, had, from time im-
memorial, held it of the kings of England, at an annual
fee-fiurm rent of 10/. 16s. And they had also enjoyed
divers franchises, liberties, gifts, and acquittances, as
well by prescription, as by royal concessions and patents.
These charters being either lost or destroyed by fire
or some other casuality, there were no sufficient letters-
patent in existence. The inhabitants, therefore, humbly
petitioned that the royal munificence might be extended
to them, and the town incorporated anew.
The charter then, resemng the old rent, proceeded to
constitute the town a tree borough corporate, for ever,
of two bailifSs and a commonalty of twenty-four capital
burgesses, who were to form one body, called '^ the
bailiffs and commonalty of the town of Tamworth, in
the counties of Stafford and Warwick." They were
empowered to hold lands and privileges, to plead and
be impleaded, and to use a common seal in the trans-
action of their business. They were to hold common
halls, where they were to make bye-laws and ordinances,
for the well-government of the town : and these, if not
repugnant to the statutes of the realm, they might en-
force by fine or imprisonment. They were to choose
the two bailifi,* horn amongst their own body, eight
capital burgesses being present at least, on the feast of
St. Peter ad Yincula^ — the 1st of August, — annually,
between the hours of nine and twelve in the morning.
Any vacancy in the office, from death or removal, be-
tween the periods of election, was to be supplied in a
similar way, imtil the appointed time arrived. In like
1 Peter BnMlockindHrarjmmper were nominikted in the charter M the flntbalU^
CASTLE AND TOWN. 107
manner, they were directed to fill up, within eight days,
all vacancies in their own body,^ occurring firom death,
absence firom the borough for six months, or other
cause. Two sergeants were to be appointed firom time to
time, at will, to make proclamations, arrests, &c. within
the borough, in a similar manner to those of the city of
London : and each was to bear before the bailifb a silver
mace, adorned with the royal arms. The boundaries of
the borough were to remain the same as they had always
been; and the bailifis and commonalty might make
perambulations of it without impediment.
The bailifSs were then constituted justices of peace
within the borough. Before them was to be held a
court of record on every third Monday. They were
also to have a common jail for felons and malefiustors.
On warrant under their seal, the sherifis of the counties
of Stafford and Warwick were directed to receive any
prisoners.
A market was to be held on every Saturday. There
were to be two annual fairs, one on the feast of St.
Greoi^, the other on that of St. Edward ; and both to
kst for the four subsequent days. During the time
when the market and fairs were held, there were to be
courts of pie-poudre, with all liberties and firee customs
appertaining. The stallage, piccage, tolls, and all other
profits, were to go to the personal advantage of the
bailiffs. They were to have assize of bread, wine, ale,
and victuals, as well as of measures and weights, and
the correction of them, and of aU things belonging to
the office of the clerk of the market of the queen's
household. The profits accruing were also to be ap-
propriated by the bailiffs. View of firank-pledge of all
1 The namei of the lint capital burgesBes were given In the charter.
108 TAMWORTH
the inhabitants^ whether entirely resident or not, was
granted. It was to be held twice in the year, onoe
within a month after the feast of St. Michael, and again
within the same limits after Easter, before the bailifi;
who were to take the profits for their own use. And,
finally, the charter empowered the corporate body to
acquire lands and other possessions, of the annual yalae
of 40/. or less, notwithstanding the Mortmain act, or
any other statute.^
From the preamble of the charter, it is evident that
the concessions which Elizabeth thus made were rather
renewals of those previously enjoyed, than firesh grants.
Yet the change introduced by her in the form of
government of the town, by the appointment of a self-
elective corporation, in whom she vested all local
powers, was of very great importance, especially in the
political aspect under which we shall soon have occa-
sion to view it. With regard to other minor modifica
tions, most of them will have been already anticipated
by the reader. The queen included both sides of the
town imder one jurisdiction; reduced the bailiflb to two;
and altered the time of their election. She substituted
sergeants-at-mace for the low-baili£Es ; and entirely
abolished the victual-conners. The ancient office of
chamberlains was continued, although not under any
chartered provision.
In the tremendous religious revolution, which occur-
red in the middle of the sixteenth century, it became a
most important object either to a Catholic or Protestant
government, to gain over, and if possible control, the
powers which the people possessed in the House of
Commons. Both parties called to their aid the whole
1 Chmrter, 3 Eliz. :~Corporation Records.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 109
of the resources which they possessed. It became a
time of the most actire employmeat of the discretionary
powers of the sherifi of different counties^ as to what
places should be considered parliamentary boroughs.
None were now omitted, which, in public estimation,
had a prescripiiye right. We accordingly find that, in
the reigns of Edward VI., Philip and Mary, and EliMr
beth, seventeen boroughs resumed the privilege, whidi
they had once exerted, but permitted to &U into disuse;
and forty-six more now first began to send representa-
tives: thus making an addition of 1S8 members to the
lower house. Amongst the latter, Tamworth commenced
the exercise of its powers, in 1563. Ever since, it has
continued to return members,' with the exception of a
short period during the commonwealth.^
But the most novel assumption of power, at this
time, was that of remodelling, by governing charters,
the municipal constitutions of the new or revived
boroughs. The local government of them was vested
entirely in a small select body, ever afterwards to be
self-elected. In many places, too, the return of the
parliamentary members was given entirely to this cor-
poration, or was adopted by it with the tacit consent of
the crown. The latter appears to have been frequently
the case vdth Tamworth, in Elizabeth's reign.' Thus
the people were deprived completely of all mimicipal
and political power, and placed imder the domination
of persons chosen by the crown; over the actions of
whom they possessed not the least control.
The nomination of the first officers was always from
the partizans and supporters of government. The peo-
ple were thus secured to the interest of those in power.
1 See Appeadiz :— Note 8. 2 Corpontton Records.
no TAMWORTH
Or> on the other hand, they were incapacitated from
expressing their sentiments in a constitutional manner,
or to act, at least with any efficiency, against the
designs of their existing rulers.
These were the sdiemes to which Edward VI., and,
in a few instances, Philip and Mary resorted. But it
was left for Elizabeth to adopt sudi courses to the
greatest lengths which prudence would permit. They
formed the first and most important step towards a
subsequent attempt to overthrow the whole liberties of
the people, and to establish a despotism. But the re-
action, which, after some tune, took place, proved the
madness of the design, and well nigh terminated in
a way very opposite to that which was intended. The
result was a long and terrible struggle between the
crown and people, when the whole fabric of monardiy
was shaken to its foundations, and, for a brief space,
that power destroyed, which it had been sought so
imduly to exalt.^
The year, in which Tamworth assumed its prescriptive
right, and revived as a place of political importance,
was one of misfortune to it, from another circumstance.
The town was then visited by the plague, — that dread-
frd scourge, which so frequently desolated other parts
of the kingdom, and especially the metropolis. The
notice of its appearance here, occurs in the Parish-regis-
ter; but, at the same time, no account is given of the
extent of its ravages. From the beginning of Novem-
ber, 1560, to December, 1568, there are no entries in
the record, nor is there any space left in the leaf; but
this note occurs. ** The names of them y^ wer buried
of y* plague in An^ d'ni 1568." The names, however,
1 See Penny CycIoptedU .—Art. BorougAi,
CASTLE AND TOWN. Ill
are not given. ' Whether they were ever inserted^ or
were omitted by the minister^ who transcribed the early
part of the register^ cannot be ascertained. Deaths from
the plague are again mentioned in July and August,
1597 ; when the disease extended to Wilnecote, and the
neighbourhood.'
To the close of the reign of Philip and Mary, under
the ancient system of goyemment, the fee-&rm rent for
the Warwickshire side of the town appears to have
been punctually rendered. But the new corporation
neglected its payment for three and twenty years; un-
til, in 1582, they were involved in a debt of two sums,
one of 116«., the other of 127/. IZs. In the Michael-
mas term of this year, they obtained an order that no
legal process should be awarded against them, until they
should have had time to bring in their charter and
plead during the ensuing term.'
For a short ^time, * we ' must recur^ to the details of
chartered grants. - Elizabeth had already given to the
corporate body, as the representative of the town, many
of the privileges; which the inhabitants had formerly
enjoyed. But there still remained others, for the con-
tiniuuice of which she had not provided. A second
application to royal bounty, therefore, became necessary.
The inhabitants found a ready advocate in the cele-
brated &vourite, Bobert Devereux, earl of Essex, who
had then risen high in* his sovereign's favour, and
possessed no small influence at court. He was closely
connected with the town ; and took much interest in its
wel&re. His mother resided at Dray ton-manor ; and
there he spent a great part of his time. Through his
mediation, the queen granted a second charter, bearing
1 PBrJtli.recister, s Carporation Records.
11£ TAMWORTH
date on the 10th of October, 1588, by which many
important concessions were made.
By these letters-patent, the inhabitants were fireed
from being put with strangers upon any juries, occurring
without the limits of the town, unless they should hold
possessions not within these bounds, for which they
oi^ht to be empannelled. And no strangers were to
be intruded upon those required in the borough, eyen
though they possessed lands and tenements there, unless
the matter should concern the soyereign of the realms.
And the bailiffii and commonalty were empowered to
elect, from time to time, at pleasure, a recorder of the
town. They were also to haye a high-steward. This
office was giyen to Robert Deyereux, earl of Essex, and
his heirs male for eyer; in de&idt whereof, the bailiffs
and capital burgesses might haye the choice. And be-
sides, there was to be a town-derk, or prothonotary of
the town, for all courts, and yiews of frank-pledge or
leets. Preyiously to assuming office, he was to take
the necessary oaths in the presence of the chief
steward. The bailifb, high-steward, recorder, and
town-derk, the three latter of whom were not to accept
office without royal approyal, were to be justices of
peace within the precincts of the town. The court of
record was to be held on eyery third Monday, before
any two of them, or the under-steward ; of whom, how-
eyer, a bailiff was to be one : and they m^ht determine
any cases as well of assizes of noyel disseizin, mort d'an-
cestor and fresh force, as of all other actions, suits, and
personal matters. A fiur was granted to be held on the
feast of St. Swythen, and for four days after, with the
usual court of pie-poudre. The bailiflEs and common-
alty were to haye all waifs and strays, and employ
CASTLE AND TOWN. US
them for their common benefit. The baili£& were to be
included in aU commissions of array of men-at-anns^
hobehos^ and bowmen, within the borough. And the
corporate body was still to enjoy all rights, jurisdictions,
franchises, liberties, privileges, lands, tenements, rents,
commons, waters, fisheries, and other easements, profits,
and emoluments, which had previously been given to
them by royal grant, or private donation.
The bailifb and commonalty were then constituted
a body corporate, under the title of ** Guardians and
Grovemors of the possessions, revenues, and goods, of
the Free Grammar School of Elizabeth, queen of Eng-
land, in Tamworth."' As the charter now enters into
matters which regard the Church and School alone, we
shall defer giving the remainder, until those fi>undations
come tmder our immediate notice.
Upon the concessions thus made by Elizabeth, no
observations are needed, except in the case of the high
stevrardship. This subject, indeed, is rather curious,
and worthy of attention.
When we formerly spoke of this office, we left it in
the hands of Humphry Ferrers. By him, it was held
when the queen conferred it on the earl of Essex and
his heirs. This second grant, without any annulment
of, or even reference to, the former one, caused some
difference between the rival stewards ; which threatened
to proceed to some lengths. Humphry Ferrers, who
insisted that his patent was still of force, referred the
matter to William Cecil, baron Burleigh, then lord high
treasurer of England. He was, however, prevailed up-
on by. this minister-of-state to forego all proceedings
against the royal favourite, in a matter involving only
1 Charter, 30 Bliz :— Corporation Records.
114 TAimrORTH
an honorary title. As a compensation, he was promised
some other post of higher dignity and greater emolu-
ment. Whether any reward were made to Hmnjduy,
afterwards sir Humphry Ferrers for his forbearanoey
we have not discovered. It is certain that, perhaps in
continual expectation of receiving it, he consented to
let the matter rest : and nothing more is heard of it fi»
some time. But immediately on the attainder of the
gifted but unfortunate Essex, for high tieason, sir
Humphry resumed the office, by virtue of his old grant
He was, however, doomed a second time to be dis-
appointed; for it was given, under the great seal of
Ei^land, to sir John Egertcm. It is only justice to
add that this was done in ignorance of the previous
circumstances. It was certainly somewhat anomalous;
for the crown had assumed the appointment, which,
by the charter, was placed principally in the hands of
the corporate body.
Sir Humphry Ferrers was, at this time, determined
to carry on the matter, and vindicate his daim. He
wrote to lord Buckhurst, first lord of the treasury, and
to sir Robert Cecil, representing his case to them. He
stated that the office had been previously held by his
great-grandfitther, and others of his ancestors, and that
it had also been given to him. He had, he said, ser-
ved her majesty faithftilly and with great zeal, as a
justice of peace in three counties, when the most ardu-
ous exertions were required. He doubtless alluded to
the period, when the unfortunate Mary, queen of Scots,
remained a captive at Tutbury-castle, in Staffinrdshire.
No cause of misdemeanor had been found in him,
whereby his patent should be forfeited; and he trusted
that, in regard to his services and his r^ht, the office.
CASTLE AMD TOWN. 115
which was valueless in point of emolument^ might be
veatored to him.'
The towns-people also actively took up sir Humphry's
cause, on account of his residence at the Castle ; whilst
sir John Egerton lived at a distance. They presented
a petition in his fiivour to king James I. ; who had
then just ascended the throne.' Aflter a little delay, the
stewardship appears to have been given back to him.
He did not live very long to enjoy the honour, of
which he had been unjustly deprived for fifteen years;
for he died in January, 1607.
About the period when Elizabeth conferred her second
charter on the town, there arose a considerable dispute
between many of the inhabitants and Humphry Ferrers,
llie latter held the Casde-miU situated on the Tame,
for himself and his heirs for ever, of the queen, at an
annual fee-farm rent of 10/. To it, these inhabitants
owed suit and soke, and had all their com groimd
there. But, during the space of more than three years,
diey gradually adopted the use of small malt-miUs or
querns, at their private residences: and latterly they
carried all their grain to mills at a distance from the
town. Humphry Ferrers was, at length, compelled to
have recourse to legal measures to enforce his right.
He accordingly preferred his complaint to the honour-
able court of Exchequer. After some tune, he obtained
an injunction to oblige the inhabitants to grind all
their com at his place, and to restrain the use of the
querns ; which threatened to prove a very serious detri-
ment to, and even eventually to ruin, his mill.'
Sec Appendix -.'Note 9. s See Appendix:— Note 10.
3 Corporation Records.
116 TAMWOETH
A little previously, we gave a short outline of the
mode in which Elizabeth, for the purpose of carrying
out the designs of her government, foimd it necessary
to exalt the royal prerogatives. There was now only
one more step which she could adopt, in order to secure
the parliament to herself, — to dictate to different cities
and boroughs the persons who should be elected as
their representatives. And, to this scheme, we find
that she really had recourse, by means of her agents.
The interference occurred more with regard to small
places, or those where her partizans possessed much
influence. The following letter, written by the earl of
Essex previously to the election in 1592, contains some
of the nominations for places in Staffordshire; and
amongst them for Tamworth. Other coimties were
similarly influenced: and hence is seen the great extent
to which the practise was carried.
Robert Deoereux^ earl of Essex ^ to Richard Bagoty esq.
'^ Mter my hartie commendacions. I have written
severall letters to Lichfield, Stafford, Tamworth, and
Newcastle, for the nomination and election of certen
burgesses for the Parliament to be held verie shortlie;
having named unto them, for Lichfield, sir John Wing-
field and Mr. Broughton, — ^for Stafford, my kinsman
Henry Bourgcher and my servant Edward ReynoUs, —
for Tamworth, my servant Thomas Smith, — ^for New-
castle, Dr. James, — whome, because I do greatlie desire
to be preferred to the said places, I do eamestlie pray
your fiirtherance, by the creditt which you have in
those towns, assuring them of my thankfulness, if they
shall for my sake gratifie those whom I have com-
mended; and yourself that I will not be unmindfuU of
TOWN AND CASTLE. 117
your Gouitesie therem. So I commend you to Crod's
good protecjdon: from Hampton-Court^ the last daye of
December, 1592.
Your assured friend,
ESSEX."
''I send unto you the seTerall letters, which I praye
you cause to be deliuered according to their directions."^
Of the persons thus named, sir John Wingfield,
Bichard Broughton, Henry Bourchier, Thomas Smith,
and John James, M.D., were actually returned; besides
one of the knights of the shire, sir Christopher Bloimt,
whom, in another letter to Sichard Bagot, the earl
had pointed out as being considered a proper repre-
sentatiye.
Very shortly after this time, if we may credit a
long series of heayy charges brought against them, the
baOiffii of the town unfortunately did not adhere to the
integrity of conduct, which should ever characterize
those to whom the dispensation of justice is committed.
The corrupt practices, of which several of them were
accused in the execution of their office, are set forth
in a paper written at the time, entitled, ''Notes of
the abvses of the bailiffes of Tamwo'th." Nine are
implicated by name, John Stokes, Thomas Ashlock,
William Shemon, Robert Scale, John Wright, Peter
Bradock, Nicholas Wilcox, John Turner, and Henry
Baron. The document, from its singularity, has been
inserted in the appendix: and thither the reader may
turn for full information on this point.' Each may
then judge as he thinks best of the guilt or innocence
1 ErdMwicke't Surrey of StalRmlBhire, by Harwood, edit. 1844. This letter was,
amongst others, broni^ht forward by Canning, to show the undue inflaence formerly
ezerdied over etoctioos. in a speech delivered on the SAth of April, 18S2; when a
motion for parliamentary reform was discussed in the House of Commons.
s See Appendix:— Note il.
118 TAMWORTH
of the parties ; for, in the absence of any other record
on this pointy it woidd be impossible to give any
decided opinion. If the whole should be fiilse, we most
censure the malevolence of the accuser: if true, we
can only lament the circumstance^ and wish it had
been in our power to present some points^ which
would redeem the characters of those accused^ or miti-
gate their condemnation. Shakespeare well remarks^ in
speaking of cardinal Wolsey^
" Men's evil maniien lire in bnae ; their vlrtiiet
We write in water."
So concerning the bailiffs^ the bad remains on lasting
record: whilst to learn the good, we fain must send
our readers to the stream to see what they may find.
We fear the watery page is bbmk; and that the
cleansing flood, in opposition to its wonted course, has
washed away the whole, and left the stain behind.
Once, indeed, the hand which traced the stream with
useless toil, wrote on the sandy shore, a short but
pleasing word. It was ''Charity"; and Peter Bradock
claimed it as Ins own. But oyer it now the swelling
wave has passed, and scarcely left a single mark behind.
The next incident worthy of notice, is the re-appear-
ance of the pestilence in the town, in 1596. This
dreadful disease seems to have raged with great fury,
aggravated by the partial famine, which then prevailed
in the country. The deaths were so numerous here,
that the distress occasioned by the insufficient supply
of com was, in some measure, alleviated ; according to
a memorandum in the Parish-rqpbter, Mardi, 1597-8.
*' Dyvers died of y« blouddie flixe. At w^ tyme the
darth of come somwhat abated by reason of deathe
& dauske Rye."
CASTLE AND TOWN. 119
In the last few years ot Elizabeth's protracted leign^
there oocuned a long and important law-suit between
the bailiffs and commonalty^ and William Comberford,
regarding the Staffordshire part of the town. To this
moiety, the latter claimed a right. The grounds on
which his demands were founded were — ^that frequently,
whilst the Hastily' fiimily held it and Wigginton,
these two places were considered as forming but one
manor: — ^that, as owner of Wigginton, he received the
fise-fiurm rent of lOda* firom the bailifb, in equal quarterly
sums : — and that he had sometimes held the court-leet
of Wigginton in the Staffordshire Town-hall : at which
he had induced some poor inhabitants of the town to
do suit. He, and his son Humphry for him, demanded
the power of proclaiming the fidrs ; but the bailiffs pre-
yented them Ikom carrying their intentions into effect by
threats of immediate arrest. Mr. Comberford then sent
men to dig and delve within the precincts of the town;
tliereby asserting his right to it. The bailiffs and
commonalty now commenced an action in common law
law against him for trespass. Haying, by some means,
obtained possession of numerous important documents,
he caused no small d^ree of trouble to the corpcMration.
But at length, an injunction, dated the Slst of May,
1599, was obtained; by which he wai» compelled to
produce the records. The bailifb and commonalty were
then enabled to substantiate their rights, and com-
pletely orerthrow their opponent's cause.'
In October, November, and December, 1606, the
town was re-visited by the plague; but it does not
appear to have been very violent in its ravages.'
During the frequent progresses which James I. made
1 Corpoffatloii Reoonto. 2 Parish Register.
120 TAliWORTH
through the kingdom^ in the latter part of his reign^
Tamworth was fiiYOured seyeral times with the royal
presence. The first visit is thus recorded in the Parish
register: —
''August, 1619.
Kinge James ^ Prince charles.
The 18th day. James, cure noble Kinge, & y^ wor-
they prince Charles came to Tamworth. The Kinge
lodged at y« castell; And y* prince at the mothalL
Mr. Thomas Ashley & Mr. John Sharp, then be-
lieffes, gaue royall entertaynment."
On his host, sir Humphry Ferrers, the king had
previously conferred the honour of knighthood, during
his stay at Warwick. But the same distinction was
not extended to Mr. William Comberford; whose house
the prince made his residence. The kind of reception
given to the royal visitors has been passed over in
silence by historians. Imagination, however, may easily
supply the void; and an acquaintance with ike festive
customs of those times add the particulars. The king
remained in the town during the whole of the 19th.
On the following day, he created Philip Eaton a knight,
probably just before he quitted the town on his way
to Warwick, for a second time.'
Two years subsequently, James I. paid another visit
to Tamworth; whilst prince Charles remained at Kenil-
worth. On the Slst of August, 1621, he came to the
Castle ; when he knighted sir Edmund Windsor. Here
he remained until the following morning ; and then he
continued his progress to Warwick again.
The king made a third and final visit to this town
in August, 1624. On the 19th, he dined at Wichnor,
1 Nicholi* ProffreMM of Junes I. a lb.
CASTLE AND TOWN. ISl
in Staffordshire. On his arrival here^ in the evening
of the same day, at the seat of sir Humphry Ferrers^
he knighted sir John Skeffington, of Skeffington, in
Leicestershire ; who was^ at that time, high sheriff of
the county of Stafford. The prince did not accompany
his father, but stayed at Kenilworth. In the ensuing
day, the king proceeded to Bastwell-hall.'
In the Parish-roister, there is no notice taken of
either the second or third visits of James; but there
occurs the following entry: —
"August, 1624.
S6, was bur. John Clarke, the King's servant."
In 1626, the plague appeared again in the town, but
finr the last time. In October of that year, there were
eleven persons buried, " cum multis aliis ratione pestis,"
the names or number of whom have not been re-
corded.'
In the unhappy and disastrous dvil wars, which
arose in the middle of the sixteenth century, Tamworth
took a very active part. The long disputes between
the parliament and Charles I., terminated in the as-
sumption of royal prerogatives, totally incompatible with
the constitution. The king, finding that he could not
control the legislative body, at last . tried to rule inde-
pendently of their authority: and the parliament as
8ted£istly refused to yield up the power vested in
them. The long series of encroachments on the free-
dom of the people, which had been gradually carried
on horn the days of Elizabeth, was brought to a crisis.
No resource was left for either side, except the mainte-
nance of their claims by an appeal to arms, or an
unconditional submission to the other party. But nei-
1 Nichols' FrogresMS. 2 Piurlth Register.
122 TAMWORTH
ther would compromise their cause in the least degree.
The people now took the side which they believed
correct, or which interest and passion indicated. To
the king's standard, flocked the major part of the
members of the old and noble &milies of the land.
To the aid of the parliament, congregated immense
numbers, especially of the middle and lower classes.
Indeed, from a conscientious opposition to the despotism
which the king endeavoured to establish, many attached
themselves to the popular side, who equally disliked
the democratical system which they were unawares
aiding to set up, and who would have drawn back
in dismay had they been able to foresee idtimate
consequences. But neutrality was next to impossible.
Such a course would have rendered a person the object
of suspicion and dislike to both factions; and would
have entailed certain ruin, which might have been
avoided, partially at least, by joining either party. At
first, the balance of justice was imdoubtedly on the
side of the people. But soon it preponderated in &vour
of the royalists, in consequence of the extreme lengths
to which the parliamentarians resorted. Of Ihe two
evils, a despotism and a democracy, the choice undoubt*
edly lies vastly in favour of the former.
Another great cause of the outbreak of the civil war,
must be sought in the peculiar religious temper which
prevailed very generally throughout the country. The
doctrines of the puritans, although discountenanced by
the state, and even attenipted to be extinguished by
civil means, had spread like a pestilence amongst the
people. At the same time, the high-church principles
advocated by archbishop Laud, and which Charles endea-
voured to enforce so long as he had any authority.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 123
gave great scandal to these puritans and to the presby-
terians. They also alienated many in the establish-
ment, who had imbibed the spirit of these men. Such
persons now took the opportunity of expressing their
sentiments, and upholding their opinions in public. So
greatly did these motives prevail, that the war, com-
mencing at first in dvil causes, after a very short
period, entirely assumed the aspect of a religious strife :
and soon we have a mournful picture of the dread-
ful lengths to which an erroneous and unbridled enthu-
siasm is calculated to carry the human mind.
The refusal of the governor of Hull to admit the
king within the walls of that town, constituted the first
signal for war&re between the royalists and the parlia-
mentarians. Charles then went to Nottingham ; where
he unfurled his banner on the 22nd of August, 1642.
Directly the trumpet of war re-echoed throughout the
whole land, and sounded the mutual defiance of the
hostile companies. All the principal towns and castles
of the kingdom were now garrisoned by the soldiers
and friends of either party ; who prepared to assert and
maintiiin their cause. Hence began the desolating
commotions, which, after a time, terminated in the
death of the unfortunate king, and in the subversion of
the whole country.
At what precise time troops were first placed at
Tamworth, and to whom the command of them was
given, we have not been able to discover with certainty ;
but, in the autumn of 1642, the Castle was occupied
by the king's party. About the same time, the dose
of Lichfield cathedral, which was then walled round
and capable of being well defended, was taken posses-
sion of, by sir Richard Dyot and his friends. They
124 TAMWORTH
placed themselves under the command of the earl of
Chesterfield^ a firm adherent to the cause of his
sovereign. Nearly the whole of the surrounding neigh-
bourhood declared itself in fitvour of Charles. It was
soon a scene of active and stubborn warftre. On the
Ist of March, the republican forces marched to Lichfield
and invested the close. A fierce attack took place on
the following day. Lord Brook, the parliamentarian
general, whilst directing the si^e, was accidentally
killed. He was struck in the eye by a stray shot, .fired
from the body of the cathedral. His loss spread much
consternation through his troops; but sir William Gell,
with great promptitude, assumed the whole command
of them. He carried on his measures so efficaciously,
that, in three days, the royalists were compelled to
surrender. On the 5th, the earl and his party mardied
out of the close, to make way for their opponents/
Great hopes were at first entertained by some of the
royal party, that they might be able to expel the
rebels who were left to defend the place, befi>re they
should be well recovered and settled after the loss of
their general. For this purpose, colonel Hastings, then
at Ashby-de-la-Zouch, wrote a most urgent lett» to
the ear lof Northampton. He pointed out the success
which might attend the attempt to take Lichfield, and
the comparative ease with which it would be effected.
He besought the earl, therefore, to march speedily to
Tamworth; whither Scudamore, an officer, had with-
drawn, on hearing of the enemy's advance towards
Stafford. From this town, the latter also wrote for
further direction, as to the manner in which he should
proceed.
1 Shaw's SUllbrdshire.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 125
'< My most honoured lord^
I am extreamly joyed to hear you are at Hen-
ley-in-Arden with your forces^ and beseech you to
advance to Tamworth^ which will be the greatest ser-
vice that ever was done the king ; for^ with God's
blessings we shall beate them out of Lichfield^ or sud-
denly starve them all^ beeing there is noe reliefe can
come to them^ nor have they any provision for a day,
nor horse to fetch in any, I having soe much the
greater number. Their strength consists of several
garrisons, which are now left very weake. I have a
certainty of their niunber, by the confession of diverse
prisoners, and confirmed by severall intercepted letters.
Their number is as follows : — six small troopes of horse
and dragoones, 300 foote came with lord Brooke, 400
with Gell, and some SOO Morelanders; but part of
them armed, and noe fighters. I, God willing, will
attend your lordship with sixteene troopes of horse and
dragoons, and can, upon a night's warning, call in
1000 foote in Staffordshire, halfe of them armed, soe
that, with your lordship's forces and mine, we shall
make a good body of an army. And I have canon
carrii^es, six pound buUets, and store of small pieces,
and, within six dayes, can have culvering and demy-
culvering. My lord, you know it hath ever beene my
expressions and designs to waite upon you in any action,
which I shall doe in this to the utmost of your com-
mand. God hath given this faire opportunity to your
lordship to make you the most glorious and happie
servant to his majestic. The enemie we are to en-
counter are full of distractions with the loss of their
lord generall, and under severaU commands, and the
souldiers raw and inexperienced, but rich w^ plundered
ins TAMWORTH
goods. My lord, I doubt not, with Grod's aBsbtance,
of a most happie siiocem, and that you will letume,
laden with honour and riches, and take all this side of
Warwickshire in your way, who have beene great rebells
to the Ung, and axe full of wealth, which will he the
reward of your and your souldiers paines : your lordship
may surveye your forces to take many armes and horses.
Indeed, my lord, your presence will be of infinite
advantage, and without it, this oountrey is in danger to
bee lost, and the rebeUs grow to a great body, that
now are not considerable; therefore let nothing divert
you from this great and good worke. As soone as I
know your lordship's resolution, God willing, I will
suddenly waite upon you, and doubt not thus better to
satisfie you then I can by letter. But I beseech you
believe this, were not the designes grounded upon much
reason and great probability of happie success, I should
not thus earnestly press your lordship, that am to
yourselfe, my lord Compton, and your gallant &mily.
Tour most faithfoll and affectionate servant,
H. HASTINGS.
Ashby-de-la-Zouch, Wednesday, 7 o'clock.**
[the 18th of March, 1642.]
^'To the right honourable, my much honoured lord,
the earl of Northampton, At Henley-in-Arden, with*
in eight miles of ColshiU, present this."
" My Lord,
At 12 o'docke this present Wednesday, wee
received intelligence from a boy that most of their
forces, both horse and foote, with some pieces of canon,
were marching towards Stafiford, which made us pre-
sently draw all our forces to Tamworth; where we
shall expect, by this night's intelligence, a certain place
CASTLE AND TOWN. 187
of rendezvous^ where we shall joyne with your lordship's
fiirces, and so constantly march in one body. What
intelligence wee shall receive this night, your lordship
shall have present notice of; and we desire to have the
like. My coloneU stais at Ashby this night, expecting
some assistance from Newarke, there being the last
night three of their prindpall gentlemen sent to him
with full assurance (in my hearing) that they would
march when he pleased into those parts of Leicester-
shiie, or where he would appoint. These forces are all
horse, which they may well spare, and doe his business
for Leicestershire. Whereby hee may the better be
spared from those parts to attend your lordship. Yes-
terday wee received intelligence that eight cometts of
horse were advanced from Derby to Leicester. And this
day it is confirmed that they are returned backe, and the
lord Gray is gone with a small partie for Northampton.
I doe expect my coUoneU here by eight in the morning,
and if your lordship shall appoint an earlier hower at
the rendezvouse, I shall move with these forces towards
you. I now speake with your lordship's messenger,
and I perceive by him that you doe not know of out
being here; but we shall have a care of the business
this night. And if their cartes (as is reported) stand
laden in Lichfield streets, it is likelier they will hasten
for Barton rather than hither. Thus having no more
at present, I kiss your lordship's handes, being
Tour lordship's humble servant,
B. SCUDAMOBE.
Tamworth, 8 in the night."
''I humbly desire that my service may be pre-
sented to colonell Wentworth, and sir Thomu Byron."*
1 Shaw*! Staflbidihire.
128 TAUWOBTH
The earl of Northampton was too much occupied in
other parts of the country to adopt colonel Hasdngs'
advice and march hither to afford aid in recoyering
Lichfield. Both these gallant soldiers commanded the
royal troops in the combat which took place on the
19th of March, at Salt-heath, near Stafford, against
those of sir John GeU and sir William Brereton.
There the king's party was completely defeated; and
the earl, himself, unfortunately slain.^
The royal forces at Tamworth, however, were a
source of very great and incessant annoyance to the
enemy at Lichfield. They did not encounter the repub-
licans so much in set fights ; but they adopted the more
harrassing and efficacious mode of continually sending
out small bodies of men to attack them, when they
were off their guard, or when any good prospect of
success presented itself. This kind of warfere they
kept up both day and night. One of the officers of
the royalists, who amused himself by keeping a diary
of his marches, says that this place, with Bushall-
castle, another small garrison of the king's, ''did keep
their holy brethren from dulling their spirits with over
muche sleep, in giving them several alarams, no rest
nor respite night and day, with some particularized
skennishes."* But on the Slst of April, 1643, prince
Bupert reduced Lichfield-dose, and compelled colonel
Bussel, the republican commandant, to capitulate. The
government of the place was thereupon committed to
Henry Bagot; who remained there imtil his defeat, a
little more than two years after.'
Tamworth probably enjoyed a short repose firom war-
fere for the space of two months ;- when its capture by
1 Shaw't StaflbitlihlR. a M.S. quoted by SImw. 3 Shaw*! StaftnrOaUre.
CASTLE AND TOWN.
P29
the enemy once again placed it in opposition to Lich-
field. The parliamentarian troops, under the conmiand
of colonel William Purefoy, marched from Coventry; and
commenced storming the Castle, on Wednesday, the ^rd
of June. It endured two days' siege; when the little
garrison, after having made a very stout resistance,
was compelled to surrender on the 26th.*
Republican forces were then placed here; and the
command of the Castle was given to captain Waldive
piafl daughter and heiress of William
grandton & heir of sir Humphry
Franc, and was father of
SiA Ralph db Willinoton.
liYing 37 H. III. ; who m. Joan, dan.
and heiress of Sir William Champer-
nowne of Umberleigh, in Devon. His
son.
Sir Ralph dm Willimoton,
styled by Risdon "a worthy warrior,"
was gOTemor of the castle at Exeter
38 H. III., and sheriff of Deron 42nd
of the same reign. He m. Juliana,
dan. and heiress of Sir Richard de
Lomen ; and had issue,
I. John db Willington, sum-
moned to Parliament as a Baron from
3 Ed. III. to 12 of the same reign ;
when he d,, leaving by Joan his wife,
a son and heir
Ralph db Willinoton j who was
sammoned to Parliaioent as a Baron
10 Ed. III. This Ralph was in the
wars of Scotland and France. He
m, Bljrnor, dan. of John lord Mohun
of I>an8ter, bat d. S. P. in 1349. when
the Baronjr became extinct.
II. Sir Reginald, d, S. P. 29
Ed. 3.
III. Sir Henry, of whose line we
have to treat, and
IV. Thomas, living 22 Ed. 3.
The third son.
Sir Hbnby Willington, Knight
Banneret, was with his eldest brother
John made prisoner at the battle of
Bannockbum. He subsequently took
part with the earl of Lancaster, and
John Williniiton, of Willing-
ton, in the county of Derby, was
lather of
Nicholas Willinoton, who was
contemporaneous with Robert, Ab-
bot qf Bttrtm, in the reign of King
Stephen. He was succeeded by his
son,
Nicholas Willinoton. Both he
and his &ther were liberal benefac-
tors to the convent of Repton. He
waa father of Hugo Willington living
38 H. III.; to whom succeeded next
in the male line,
Ralph db Willinoton, who
settled in Gloucestershire, temp.
long John; and afterwards founded
St. Mary's Chapel in the abbey of
St. Peter's at Gloucester, now called
Um *' Lady-ChapeL" He m. Olim-
I Parish Register. Hamper's Life of Dogdale. There is a letter, in the Harlean
M.S., from queen Henrietta-Maria to the earl of Newcastle, informing him that
T^HBworth was lost.
180
TAUWOBTH
Willington. This gentleman was of a very ancient
£Eunily, which, coming out of Gloncesterahire, was
seated at Hurley-hall in the neighbourhood. Under
him were appointed two deputy-governors, Thomas
Hunt and Richard Harvey. Owing to the vigorous mea-
sures and strenuous exertions of the able commandant, the
royalists were never able to re-take the plaoe, notwith-
standing all their endeavours. To those at Lichfield,
Tamworth became as obnoxious as it had previously
been to the rebels there. Hopwas-bridge over the
Tame, connecting the town with that city, was broken
was executed mt Bristol in 1322.
He m. Margtret, dan. of sir Alexan-
der de FreTiie, by Joan his wife, a co-
heiress of the Marmyons of Tarn-
worth ; and left a son and snocessor,
Sib Hbnbt Willinotom, 23
Ed. III. He m. IsabeU, daughter of
sir John Whalesborough ; and was
racceeded by his son,
Sift JOHW WiLLINOTON. He
m. Matilda, daughter of Sir Walter
Carminow, and had issue
I. KAhwm WiLLINOTON of WUlincton
Conit, GlovoMtershlrei who d, S. P.
lOCh of Aotust, IS8S.
U. JOBN WiLLINOTON Of Vn]Ull(tOII
Court, who 4. 8. P. 1S07.
lu. ItANNL, oo-heir, acwt ss, 5. R. IV.
1404} m. WUUam, son of air John
Boanmont, of ShirwoU.
IT. Maroakst, co.heir, m, John, eon
of rir John Wrothe.
John Willington, theoontinu-
ator of the male line. By Margery,
his wife, he left a son and successor,
William Willington, co. Glou-
cester, whoae will is dated 22nd
January, 1500. He was lather of
John Willington, co. Glouces-
ter; who by different wives had two
I. William Willington of Bar-
cheston, who (though the principal
estates had passed to the Beaumonts
and Wrothes) inherited considerable
estates in the counties of Gloucester
and Warwick, including lands at
Brailes, co. Warwick; where the
family had held land from an early
period. (John V^IKngton, the first
baron, and his iatiier Ralph both
held property there, temp. H. 3. and
Ed. 2.) He m. Ann, widow of
Thomas Middlemore, esq., of Bdg-
bsston, and daughter of Bichard
Littleton, esq., of FlUaton, co.
Stafford, by whom she had issue,
I. Mabobbt WiLLMOVOiri ». fin^
Ukuum Holt, eaq., of Aaton; and
•econdly, air Amhrooe CaVe, knight,
chibcellorofthoDadiyof Laufrtsr.
By her first htiihaDd, ahe had a aoB,
Kdwwnd Hott I who m. Dorothy, daa.
of sir John Fanen, of Tunworth
II. GoDiTB WitLiiroTOir, ». to L
Fielding, of Newnham. aacaatog of
the carts of DcnUch.
III. ElICABBTK WlLLIIfOTOir, «. to
Xdward Booghton of Lawford.
IT. Mabt WiLUVOTOK, w. to WllUsm
Sheldon, eaq., of Beoley and BbbUm.
T. MAaOARST WlLLINOTOH, W. tO ^T
Kdward OrerlUe, aaeeator to the
Kails of Warwick.
Ti. Aim WiLLuroTOw. m. to Rands
Mooatfort, eaq., of KlogBhurat.
Til. CATflAaim WiLLiNOTOir, m. flrrt
Bichard Kempe, eaq. aeoond wmiam
BOB of rir Kldiard Cateahy, and
third to Anthony, aom of sir Gearge
Throckmorton.
II. Thomas Willington, of
Huriey.haU, 32 H. yill.l541.m.
Joan, only dau. of Nicholas Night-
ingale, esq., and heiress of her mo-
ther Joyee, who was sister and
heiress of John Waldyre,. By her
he had issue,
I. Waldttb WiLLINOTON, hls heir.
CASTLE AND TOWN.
181
down. But this circumstance would only serve to
render the parties bolder, and the skirmishing between
them of a more daring character. Gk>Yemor Willington
be^;ed aid from the committee of parliament at Coven-
try, through the earl of Denbigh, as shewn by the
following letter, that he might fortify the place in a
more efficient manner, and be able better to withstand
any assaults which might occur.
A rough draught endorsed : —
" My lord's Pre to y« Parliam* in behalf of the go-
vernor of Tamworth."
IX. JoBir WziitxiroToir of WhaMaji
from whom mn desoended the Willing-
tons ofWhatetey and Tunwoith.*
TlMmiM Willington was locoeedMl
by his eldeit son,
Waldtyb Willinoton, of Hur-
ley; who St. first Joyce dan. of George
Vnnfter, esq., of Worthmgton, co.
Leicester; and secondly, in 1563,
Ifaigery, sister and co-hdress of Mi-
chad Braeehridge, esq., and by her
Thomas, his heir, two other sons,
and a danghter,
EX.ISABITH Willington, whom.
William, son of sir Walter Aston,
of Tizall, and nnde to Walter, first
lord Aston, of Forfar. Waldyre Wil-
lington J. in 1569. His eldest son,
Thomas Willington of Hurley,
at. 9th of July 1599, Alice, dan.
of John Willington, of Whateley,
and had issne, with two other sons
and fire daughters.
Waldtyb Willington, his heir,
bt^i, 18th of April, 1600. The
Ooffemor qf Tamworih CaitU. He
d. in 1676 ; end was succeeded by
his eldest son Waldyve Willington,
who had issne three sons, WilUam,
niomas, (grand&ther of the last
Thomas "^HUington, of Hnrley, who
d. S. P. in 1815,) snd Waldyre.
William the eldest d. S. P., leaying
his ymmgest brother, Waldyre his
heir. This Waldyre was high sher-
iif for Warwickshire 13 Geo. 1.; and
dying 10th of September 1733, left
a son William, who d. S. P. in 1752,
and three dans., who became co-
heiresses, only one of whom has left
descendants. This was Susanna Wil-
lington, whom. Charles Floyer,esq.,
of Hints ; whence by two daus. are
descended the present liunilies of
Floyer, of Hints, and Lerett, of
Wichnor-park.
• JolinWlttfngtonofWliatdey,AAiigiistl6l7. Be had Istoe (batidM a dao. Alice,
who m. her ooualn, Tliamas WiUlnifton, of Hurley, the tether of Waldyve Willington,
who wae foremor of Tunworth) Antlde Willington, of Whatdej, who had two sone,
rtkamuM and George, The elder, Thomas, was flitfaer of another Thomai} who, by
Marr his wife, dan. of John Swynlien, Itoq., M.P. for Tunworth, hi the reign of
Charles II., had a ion, Thomas Willington, who 4. t. r., and a daughter and
ereotoal hdreee, Jane, who m. John 8k^ esq., of Ledhonr, hi^-sheriff for Warwick-
iUre, nth Geo. 1st. } from this marriage deseends John Martin, esq., M.P. for TOwks-
y, present owner of the WhatSlsj estate.
hiiry,prei
Ote^ge
WUMmgtem, the yonnger son of Antlde, was ihfher of Bichard, and he of
another Bichard j whoee son, John Willington of Tamworth, had, besides daughters,
flve sons, John, of the Inner Temple j Bayly, lieutenant-general in the armyi
R&diaRl) llxmias} snd Fhrnds, rector of Walton-oiuTtent ; all of whom are now
deccaied without having left any issue male, except Ihomas, who had a son, the
present Francis Willington, town-clerk of "nmiworUi, who m. in 1825, Jane Ann, dan. of
the Iste Henry James Pye, esq., of Fsirlngdon-honsc, Berks, formerly M.P. for that
ooaaty ; snd has issne, Frsncls-Pye, Waldyre-Heory, John-Baiph, and Henry-Edward.
132 TAMWORTH
'' My lords and gentlemen.
Upon y* request of capt. Waldive Willingtcniy
govemo' of Tamworth castle, I am become an humble
suito'' to yo' lo'pps in his behalf, to bestow upon him
a Saker and two Drakes, for the better strengthening
of his garrison, fiir that he hath expressed his dutie in
y^ place to y* Parliam^ with a great deale of care and
vigilancy ; by w*"* meanes y* place wilbe much y* stronger,
and be thereby more enabled to withstand any assayl-
ants of the enemy in y* line of communicacon betwixt
Stafford and \is, and without y* help of w^ none of
our friends can safely passe for Lichfield garrison : and
this £EiY0ur of yo** lo'pps to him herein shall much
oblidge yo' most affect. & humble serv*,
DENBIGH."
The forces at Tamworth were maintained by contri-
butions levied from all the surrounding neighbourhood.
Weekly payments were demanded from every place, by
each party. In return, protection from the ravages of
the opposite faction was mostly expected. But it was
often impossible to afford it continually and sufficiently.
Then the piUaged people were compelled to render
their aid to both rebels and royalists. The whole coun-
try was parcelled out amongst the different troops.
The parliamentarian committee at Stafford, on the 5th
of January, ordered that the weekly pay of Bucknall
and Fenton Magna, Biddle, Fenton and Longton,
Tunstall-court, Hilton and Pencle cimi membris, should
be assigned to captain Thomas Himt, for the payment
of his officers and soldiers.' In the following month,
Joseph Heath, * of Weeford, and William, his son,
obtained a mandate from the same committee, directing
1 Shaw'8 Staflbrdihire.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 133
that no officer or soldier belonging to the king and
parliament should plunder their chattels or estates,
without special licence, as they had duly paid 50/.
levied on them for the maintenance of the garrison
here.^ In explanation of the expression ^'king and
parliament" thus adopted, we may state that it was a
common saying amongst the republicans that they were
in reality fighting for the king, with the design of
merely rescuing him firom the eril coundlkirs; by whom
he was surrounded and led against his will. But
their conduct when the king at last fell into their
hands, prodaims aloud the fiilsehood of the plea, by
which they attempted to ease their conscienoes and
justify their actions.
In the following March, a very great effort was
made by the royal party at Lichfield to take the town
again. They repaired the bridge at Hc^was, in order
that about two thousand men might pass over with
ease. Waldive Willington, the governor, was fore-
warned by a trusty spy. He wrote to the earl of
Denbigh and the parliamentarian committee at Coven-
try informing them of the circumstances, so that mea-
sures might be taken to counteract the attempt.
*' E* ho»»"« and the rest of the Comittee,
Wee have had a spedall frend that lay in
lichfeild the last night, who brings us certen intelli-
gence that this day wee shalbe fiercely assaulted by
fifteene hundred foote and five hundred horse, and that
fower peeces of ordinance are advanced upon their
carriages towards us, and that their randezvous is upon
Hoppas Hill; where wee doe now discover diverse
troopes of horse, many great companies of fbote.
1 Shaw*B StaflbrcUhire.
1S4 TAMWOBTH
Our scouts have discovered them makemg up Hoppas
Bridge; w^ may be for the passage of the caniages
and fbote. Our scouts and theires have fyred one
against another.
Yo»
WaLDYVB WnXIHOTON,
Thomas Hunt^
BicHAmn Habvbt."
''Tamworth, 18 March, 1648,
[1648-4] at 11 of the clock in the day."
But the attempt of the royalists to regain the town
was completely unsuccessful; and they weie obliged to
return to Lichfield, disappointed in their hopes.
On the 10th of May following, 1644, the earl of
Denbigh, with a company of about two thousand men,
marched from Coventry towards Tamworth.'
On the S7th of October, an order was made by the
committee at Stafford that captain George Bowes and
all his soldiers should depart out of this garrison, by
four o'clock in the afternoon; and not return without
lawful order, at their peril. It was subscribed by
Waldyue Willington, Thomas Layfeild, William Wood,
Gilbert Dukeson, Thomas Voughton, Thomas Sawkin,
Humphry Frodsham, Thomas Palmer, Thomas Knight,
and Bichard Battman.
Another order was made by this committee regarding
lands at Haselour, laid under contribution for the troops
here. *^ 19 November, 1644. Forasmuch as it is in-
formed that the commanders at Tamworth doe assesse
certen lands of the right hon^ the earle of Meathe's,
within Hassleore, which by the 400,000^ subsedie was
not assessed, nor, as is conceived, ought to be : it is there*
1 Hampcr't Life of Dngdile.
TOWN AND CASTLE. 185
fore ordered that the said earle nor his tenants shall
not be forced or constrayned to pay any levies or
weekely pay to any of the Parliament fforces for the
said land, untill such time as Mr. William Brookes
and the inhabitants of Hassleore, haying notice of this
order, shall appeare before us and show sufficient cause
to the contrary.'*'
The incessant struggles between Tamworth and Lich-
field, impoverished the whole country around, and
plunged it into the deepest confusion. The land lay
lay mostly uncultivated: for, as might be expected, no
one would incur the risk and trouble of raising crops,
which were nearly certain to be pillaged or destroyed
by either party. Hence the land-holders suffered most
severely in the wars. The rents of Mr. Francis Wol-
verston owner of Statfold, from his lands lying unoccu-
pied, were reduced to less than 100/. a year. Yet out of
this sum, he was compelled to give weekly 1/. Ss. 4d.
to the support of the republican army at Tamworth.
As it could not constantly afford him sufficient aid, he
was likewise forced to contribute to the maintenance of
the royalists at Lichfield. Being thus oppressed, Tam-
worth alone taking nearly two thirds of his scanty
income, he was compelled to apply to the parlia-
mentarian committee at Stafford, for a reduction of his
payment to their party. He accordingly obtained an
order, dated on the S9th of October, 1644; by which it
was diminished to lOs. weekly, until fiurther order.' It
was principally upon the higher and middling classes of
society that the heaviest calamities fell. Persons were
often compeUed of necessity to take up arms, that they
might maintain themselves, and preserve their families
I to InteiwlekBi-^dit. 1844.
1S6 TAMWORTH
from actual poverty. The greater part of the lower
orders had turned soldiers; and lived weU by plunder
acquired by the sword. Not a few of them added to
their military character, that of a puritanical preacher.
The country was completely over-run with these fanati-
cal men. Persons of every trade forsook their earthly
calling, in order to follow the dictates of the interior
spirit; whose colour, perchance, they had forgotten or
neglected to examine.
The warfare between Tamworth and Lichfield l<Hig
continued with imabating fierceness. The hostile spirit
of the two parties seems to have increased in acerbity
and vehemence. Thomas Hunt, one of the command-
ants here, who had been originally a tradesman at
Coventry, sent a personal challenge to colonel Henry
Bagot, the royaUst governor at Lichfield. It was
couched in the most insulting terms, which its brevity
would admit.
'' Bagot, — thou Sonne of an Egiptian hore, meete me
half the way to-morrow morning, — ^the half way betwixt
Tamworth and litchfeald, if thou darest: if not, I
will whippe thee whensoever I meete thee.
THOMAS HUNT."
"Tamworth this— December, 1644.**
The combatants accordingly met on Whittington-
heath; and a sharp encounter ensued. After some
time, the challenger himself was compelled to turn
round and fly before his opponent; who flogged him in
his retreat, and very nearly succeeded in capturing
him.*
During the following year, the skirmishing with the
royalists was incessant On the 4th of July, the
1 Mercoritta AiiUcu8,-*a royiliit paper.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 137
Scott's army came to this town. The next day, they
passed on to Birmingham; from whence they went, on
the 7th to AlcesterJ In March, 1646, lichfield-close
was invested by the parliamentarian army, under the
command of major-general Lothian. The garrison at
Tamworth afforded all their assistance. The roy-
alists were accused by the people of this town of
cruelty in killing a man in cold blood, whom they had
captured in a sally from their fortifications.* The siege
was continued with great violence, until the 10th of
July. Colonel Bagot was very severely wounded; and
the royalists were driven to the necessity of capitula-
ting. They made honourable terms with their victors;
and were allowed to march out unmolested. The
cause of the king was now very nearly extinct
throughout the whole land. The fatal battle of Naseby
destroyed the few hopes, which lingered amongst his
adherents. Shortly afterwards, as a last refuge, the
sovereign placed himself in the hands of the Scots.
These mercenary men knew not how to show mercy to
the confiding monarch; but basely betrayed and sold
him to the parliament. The scaffold was soon seen
standing by the gloomy prison walls. Then the axe
was observed to gleam momentarily in the air; and,
in the next instant, Charles had ended his eventful and
unfortunate reign. Monarchy was completely abolished ;
and democracy established.'
On the reduction of Lichfield, Tamworth had no
longer any adversaries to contend with; and it soon
assumed externally its usual peaceable condition. The
inhabitants^ so far as we can judge from the records of
I Hamper's UISb of Dogdale. 9 Parish Register,
a Clarendon's Hiatonr of the RebeUioD.
T
138 TAMWORTH
the times^ appear to have been deeply imbued with
the puritanical spirit of the age; and to have heartily
supported the cause to which they were inclined. And
it was a long time before the feeling completely died
away.
Oliver' Cromwell was chosen as the ruler of the
realms ; and he assumed the title of Protector. Remem-
bering how greatly castles and fortified places had
impeded his progress in the wars, and harassed him
in the execution of his enterprises, he ordered the
principal of them to be dismantled or destroyed, in
such a manner that they could not again be rendered
capable of defence. Amongst them, the one at Tam-
worth was included.'
During the period of the Commonwealth, a very
neat local token of Tamworth was struck, apparently
under the direction of the corporation. It is of an
octangular shape. On the obverse, it bears the inscrip-
tion, * TAMWORTH . CHAMBERLAINS ; and in the field,
THBIR
HALFB
PENNY.
On the reverse, is inscribed, ♦por change and cha-
ritie; and in the centre is placed a fleur-de-hz, — ^the
ancient arms of the town.
The political career of Cromwell, whatever may be
thought of his private life, or of the means by which
he attained power, was one characterized by very great
ability and general success. An encroachment upon
the representative powers of the people had first caused
the out-break of the war. He, therefore, endeavoured
to equalize the system, and to give to the nation the
1 SbAw't StaffbnbbiR.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 139
show, at leasts of political fireedoxn. For this purpose,
he bestowed the right of returning members to some of
the larger places^ which had not previously enjoyed it.
At the same time, he deprived many of the smaller
boroughs of the power. Amongst the latter, he included
Tamworth. Consequently, from this town were not
sent any members in 1654, 1656, and 1658.'
Weary of the confusion, which had so long predomi-
nated, and convinced, by dearly-bought experience, that
in reality a democracy was as absolute as the ancient
system of government, the majority of the people soon
desired the restoration of monarchy. The accession of
Charles 11. to regal power, in 1660, was hailed with
the greatest pleasure. As in the natural kingdom, long
and protracted exertion is followed by a period of deep
repose, so in political life^ great commotions are suc-
ceeded by a stillness more or less profound. Charles
was soon enabled to establish an external tranquillity
throughout the kingdom. But yet the calm which now
ensued was not wholly undisturbed; for the occasional
manifestations of an unquiet spirit, indicated the exist-
ence of some horrid image; which still haunted, like a
fearful dream, the public mind. Although the church of
England had been re-established by law, as it was in
the days of Elizabeth, the genius of puritanism long
existed in the nation; and proved a source of constant
irritation. In other matters, all was peaceable. Soon
a monarchy was restored nearly as absolute as that, for
the suppression of which the whole war had been com-
menced, and torrents of blood shed. Thus prone is the
human mind to run to the opposite extreme; after
having been forced, in one direction, beyond the bounds
of moderation and reason.
1 Merewether and Stephens.
140 TAMWORTH
The long parliament^ to which latterly the appellation
of ''rump'* was given, was first called together in
1640. It was abruptly broken up by Cromwell; but
after his death, it again met. Charles II. was re-called
by an assemblage succeeding it. This was soon disper-
sed; and another parliament was summoned; which met
in November, 1660; when Tamworth resumed its poli-
tical privileges, by returning members to it. But it
only continued for a few weeks. A new one was assem-
bled on the 8th of May, in the next year; which firom
the length of its duration, was styled the second long
parliament. Amongst the most remarkable of its early
acts, was one for the well-governing of municipal cor-
porations. It was required that all persons, who should
hold any civil office, or become a member of a corpo-
rate body, should take the oaths of allegiance and
supremacy, abjure the republican solemn league and
covenant, and assent to the doctrine of passive obedi-
ence. It was soon found advisable to grant to numerous
cities and boroughs, the privileges which they had
previously enjoyed. Tamworth received firesh letters
patent, dated on the 17th of February, 1668.*
By the charter of Charles, no new privileges were
conferred upon the inhabitants of the town. It merely
contained a renewal of those given by Elizabeth, in
1560 and 1588. But such alterations were made in
the oaths prescribed, as the recent enactment required;
and in the names of the officers, as the lapse of time
demanded. The only new provision was one empower-
ing the corporation to inflict a fine, not amoimting to
more than SO/., on any member of their body, who,
being duly elected baili£f, should refuse to act in the
1 Charter, l6 Car. II. :~CDrporetioii Recorda.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 141
office, or to taike the necessary oaths. The twenty-four
capital burgesses were named; and also the bailiffs.^
James Compton, earl of Northampton, was mentioned
as high-steward;' and John Allen, as town-clerk.' The
recorder was not nominated:^ nor was there any provi-
sion for the continuance of the chamberlains, although
their election continued without interruption.'
About this time, there were struck several local
tokens of tradesmen in Tamworth. So many as four
have come under our observation. None of them are
remarkable for very great neatness of workmanship; but
they are not inferior to the generality of sinular pieces
issued in Charles's reign. The description of them is
as follows: —
1. Obverse: — ^A fleur-de-liz; with the inscription round,
*KDWABD . WHITE. Bcvcrsc : — ^ IN * TAMWORTH ; and
in the field, b w.
1663.
2. Obverse : — On a shield in the centre, the demi-figure
of a king, crowned, and in the robes of state;
around, the inscription *wiijjam*michell. Keverse:
* OP * tamworth ♦ 1666 ; and in the field,
' his
HALFB
PENNY
« * *
8. Obverse: — .William and rober* caw*; and in the
field, the figure of a chandler in the act of dipping.
Reverse : — ♦.of tamworth. 1668. ; and in the centre,
• ♦ •
THEIR
HALFE
PENT
«
1 See Appendix: -Note 19. 3 See Appendix :~Note 14.
2 See Appendix:— Note 13. 4 See Appendix:— Note 15.
S Sec Appendix :— Note 16.
142 TAMWORTH
4. In the fourth, the inscription reads very irregularly.
Obverse : — ^bobbbt gbeekb* of ; and in the centre,
HIS
HALFE
PBNNT
1671.
Keverse : — * tamwobth * merceb; and in the middle,
a demi-figure of a king, placed on a shield.
During the oontinuanoe of the second long parlia-
ment, a writ was issued for the election of a member
for this town, in place of John, lord Clifford. A con-
test ensued between Charles, lord Clifford, and John
Ferrers, esq. The former, having the majority of the
votes of the members of the corporate body, was de-
clared to have been returned. Against this proceeding
Mr. Ferrers petitioned: and the right of election was
brought before a committee of the House of Commons.
The question raised was, whether the power belonged
exclusively to the bailiffs and capital burgesses, or to
the whole of the populacy and burgesses of the town.
A report was made to the House on the S6th of May,
1670, by Mr. sergeant Charleton. The decision of the
committee, that the right belonged wholly to the bailifi
and corporate body, was confirmed by a majority of
six, the number of the votes being 90 to 84. Lord
Clifford was, therefore, declared duly elected.^ The
evidence, upon which the decision was made, is not
given; but it is certain that, in the reign of Elizabeth
the right was occasionally exercised by the bailiffs and
capital burgesses alone. The same course was adopted
just before the rebellion; for against it, eighty-seven of
the inhabitants petitioned, but without avail.*
1 M.S., copied flrom the JonmalB of the CtunmoDs.
a See Appcodix :— Note 17.
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 143
Amongst the numerous singular acts of Charles's
reign^ his proceedings to bring more fully into the
power of the crown the municipal corporations of the
kingdom, hf issuing writs of quo-warranto against the
principal of them, was not the least worthy of notice.
Without regarding the justice or injustice of the design
which he had in view, it was a very irregular course.
For, by demanding by what right these bodies acted, he
seemed to question the power of the crown to grant
privileges by letters-patent. Yet^ at the same time,
he was endeavouring to increase the royal preroga-
tives. James II., when he came to the throne, not
only adopted the same practice, but carried it out in
its greatest degree. Indeed, his reign was very sadly
marked by proceedings of the most arbitrary nature.
Towards the close of the year 1687, most of the
cities and boroughs of the realm were served with writs
of quo-warranto. Tamworth was included amongst
them. The bailiflb and capital burgesses held a meet-
ing on the 7th of March, to debate upon the measures
which it would be most advisable to adopt. Acting
under the advice of lord viscount Weymouth, the high-
steward, and sir Andrew Hackett, the recorder, they
resolved, by twelve to five votes, to appear, by their
attorney, in order to appeal against the surrender.
But, on the 9th of April following, 1668, the subject
was again brought forward, and taken into deeper
consideration. With the consent of the recorder, it was
resolved, without a dissentient voice, that the charter,
and with it all privileges, should be given up to his
majesty's pleasure, before the first day of the ensuing
term. This was to be done by the high-steward;
or, if he should not be able, by the recorder; or.
144 TAMWORTH
in hifi unavoidable absence, by the bailifi, Samael
Buckland and William Harding. An instrument was
accordingly drawn up, by which all authority and
and liberties were returned into the king's* hands. But
a prayer was subjoined that a re-grant might be made
of such powers and privileges, as his majesty should
think best fitted for the regulation of the town.^ On
the 21st of May, it was ordered that William Harding
should give up the charter. He accordingly carried it
to London; and it was delivered to Mr. Brent, who
had been authorized by James to receive it.
The old corporation still exercised its powers, until
the king's wiU might be determined as to the mode in
which the town should be regulated. On the day of
the annual election of the bailiflb, Buckland and Har«
ding were requested to continue their office, for the
ensuing year. But they declined; and William Wilcox
and Francis Wright were then chosen. A few days
afterwards, the town-clerk brought down a new charter.
By it, the government of the town was vested in a
mayor and a body of twelve aldermen. Two additional
annual fairs were granted; and many other important
advantages conferred upon the inhabitants. The whole
expenses attendant upon its procurement, amounted to
100/. Morgan Powell, the town-clerk, was nominated
as the first mayor; and, on the 10th of August, he
took the oath, before Matthew Floyer, esq., one of the
justices of peace for Sta£fordshire, to perform his duties
with fidelity, until the ensidng first of August, when a
new officer should be elected. The aldermen were
Walter Ashmore, William Ashley, Thomas Roade, Wil-
liam Wilcox, Francis Wright, John Vaughton, George
1 See Appendix :— Note 18.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 145
Wright, Thomas Wagstaffe, Robert Green, Jonathan
Symonds, Francis Wood, jun., and Edward Symonds.
The majority of them had been members of the late
corporate body.
The new government endured only for a very brief
space of time. James became so involved in difficulties,
increased by a threatened invasion of the Dutch, that
he was obliged to retract in many of his arbitrary acts.
On the 17th of October, he issued a proclamation
declaring that all forfeited charters, whereupon judg-
ment had not been entered, should be restored to the
condition in which they were in 1679. The old corpo-
ration of this town consequently resumed its powers
and liberties : and Harding and Buckland, being bailiffs
at the time of its dissolution, were then induced to
resume the office for the ensuing year. Wilcox and
Wright were consequently displaced.^
But James had already proceeded too far to make
any concessions of avail. He had forfeited for ever
the &vour and confidence of his subjects. Before the
termination of the year, he was compelled to abdicate
the throne, and reluctantly to pass into exile. His fall
was rendered doubly severe by the circumstance of his ri-
vals being his own daughter Mary, and her husband. She
could with apathy aid in the ruin of her parent, and
with total indifference enjoy his state, who was now an
outcast, and dependant upon the bounty of strangers
for his support.
At the general election, in 1698, a contest ensued at
Tamworth between sir Henry Gough and John Chet-
wynd, esq. The latter was returned: but against him
a petition was presented by his opponent. The right
1 Orders of Cominou Halls :~Corpor»tion Records.
U
146 TAMWORTH
of election again came before a committee of the House
of Commons. The question raised was whether non-re-
sident freeholders had a right to vote, as well as those
who paid scot and lot. Sir Roland Gwynn, on the
17th of March^ reported the proceedings ci the com-
mittee.
The council of the petitioner maintained that both
had an equal right. Several witnesses were called, who
asserted that they, as non-resident freeholders, had been
admitted to the privilege. Only one had been objected
to, and this by John Allen, the town-derk; but the
vote was allowed to pass.
Upon the other hand, the council for the sitting
member produced the verdict of 1670 in his fitvour.
Witnesses were also brought forward, who gave evidence
concerning several elections from the year 166L They
said that the right was vested in the bailifb and capi-
tal burgesses, and the scotters and letters; and that
the out-freeholders did not pretend to the power until
1679. At that time, lord Weymouth, then sir Thomas
Thynne, presented himself as a candidate. Morgan
Powell, his steward, was then a bailiff; and admitted
to poll all who came, and amongst others the out-free-
holders. They had continued to vote afterwards ; but
they were never regarded as properly possessing the
right. And for this reason, at the same election,
Daniel Jordan, the other bailiff, refused to sign the
poll.
Notwithstanding the dear evidence which was pro-
duced, that the introduction of the freeholders was a
recent and intrusive act, it was resolved by the com*
mittee that the right of election of burgesses to serve
in parliament for the borough of Tamworth, lay in
CASTLE AND TOWN. 147
the inhabitants paying scot and lot, and in those
persons who had freeholds within the borough, whether
they were resident there or not.' This, according to
the obsenration of Merewether and Stephens, was one
of the earliest instances of the introduction of non-resi-
dents, in defiance of the clear and express words of the
statute, enacted in the reign of Henry Y.' In conse-
quence of this decision, the returned member was
unseated.
But the verdict, of so opposite a character to that
given in the reign of Charles II., was reversed after
the election in 17SS. At this time, the petitioner
asserted that Tamworth was a borough by prescription;
and that the right lay in the inhabitant householders
paying scot and lot. He adduced nearly the same evi-
dence as had been brought forward nearly twenty-four
years previously. The sitting member claimed the right
for the non-resident freeholders ; and contended that the
decision of 1698 could not be altered. But the verdict
of the committee was against him. Thus, after the en-
deavour upon one side to confine the right of voting to
the small select corporate body, and on the other side
to extend it to non-residents, it was constitutionally de-
fined that to be a bui^ess of Tamworth it was necessary
to be an inhabitant householder, paying scot and lot.'
Questions concerning this matter were again raised
after the contests in 1741 and 1818. On the former
occasion, it was established that certificate men had not
any right; and on the latter occasion, that it was not
necessary to pay church rates as well as those for the
poor.''
1 M. S., copied from the Joarnals of the Commons.
2 History of Boroughs And Monidpal corporations.
3 Merewether and Stephens. 4 lb.
148 TAMWORTH
For a very considerable time after the termination of
the seventeenth century, the general history of Tam-
worth presents very little worthy of record. Even du-
ring the stormy epoch, when Charles Edward Stuart
penetrated into England so &r as Derby, in bis attempt
to gain the throne of his ancestors, no commotion was
produced here, beyond the mere excitement, which
must always be experienced, in every place, upon the eve
of, or during, a great national revolution. Undoubtedly
had the Pretender succeeded in his schemes, the town
would have flourished in its wonted peaceable condition,
as it did under the sway of the r^nant house of
Brunswick.
But although Tamworth remained thus quiet, it
must not be concluded that it was declining, or even
remaining stationary, in prosperity. On the contrary,
it is evident that the town was now, with a quiet but
accelerating speed, progressing in a manner which was
soon destined to elevate its condition, and improve its
general aspect. The erection of the greater part of the
public edifices is referred to this period. The re-build-
ing of the Free Grammar School was succeeded by
that of the Town-hall. The Almshouses were founded
and endowed; and, some years subsequently, an ade-
quate Workhouse was added. The Church and Castle
each underwent great alterations and repairs. The
same also occurred with regard to the Bridges ; and one,
at length, was wholly rebuilt. Many of the streets,
previously unfinished, were completed; and all were
very considerably improved. Most of the ancient half-
timbered and small houses rapidly disappeared to give
))lacc to others of a more modem character, and larger
size. In short, during the early part of the eighteenth
CASTLE AND TOWN. 149
century^ we may date the commencement of those
active improvements, which axe now taking place with-
in the town.
The progress in the condition of Tamworth naturally
resulted from an influx of wealth, and an increase in
the resources of the inhabitants. Several important and
lucrative trades sprang up in the town. But the
greatest impulse which was given to the place, was
consequent upon the establishment, about the years
1788-9, of the extensive cotton manu&ctures of Mr.,
afterwards sir Robert, Peel. He introduced them
into this town and the neighbourhood, particularly
about Fazeley, partly on accoimt of the eminent local
advantages of this district, and partly because of an
extensive strike amongst the workmen in Lancashire.
The Castle and Castle-mill were taken for the purpose ;
and buildings erected in Lady-meadow.^ A very great
influx of working people took place. The inhabitants
of Tamworth had now just cause to lament the opposi-
tion which they had manifested to the passage of a
canal close by the town. It was at first contemplated
to have carried a line firom Fradley, near Lichfield, to
Coventry, by way of Tamworth. But the people here
dreaded so great an innovation on their antiquated
ideas; and it was finally carried at a distance, by
Fazeley. The production of a great traffic in this small
village, almost simultaneously firom the canal and Mr.
Peel's works, caused it soon to assume the aspect of a
small town. So great was its increase that it became
a very common belief that, in a short time, it would
assume a superiority over Tamworth in every way.
But the subsequent decline, in a great measure, of the
1 Parish Recister.
150 TAHWOBTH
cotton manu&ctures, withdrew the chief cause of its
prosperityj although the traffic ariaing from the canal has
ever since been a great support
Tamworth became a place noted throughout the country
for the extreme gaiety of its company. It also obtained
celebrity for its excellent fiure — so essential to the com-
fort and happiness of Englishmen^ — particularly for its
mutton-pies and ale. A great addition was made to
the liyeliness of the town^ by the erection of a large
and commodious theatre. Here some of the brightest
stars of the stage^ and amongst them Mrs. Siddons,
did not think it unworthy of their greatness to appear.
Besides Mrs. Siddons^ we may enumerate as having
graced, by their appearance, the stage at Tamworth,
Miss Farren, afterwards the countess of Derby; Miss
Harriet Mellon, who eventually became the duchess of
St. Albans ; and, we believe. Miss Foote. Miss Mellon,
during her stay in the town, had apartments in Market-
street, at a house dose by the Casde-inn.
Before the erection of a theatre, the Town-hall was
occupied as a play-house; and also a large and com-
modious bam nearly at the bottom of Lichfield-«treet.
But, at the close of the century, Tamworth partici-
pated in the gloomy feeling, which then overspread the
nation. The storm, that had long been gathering over
Europe, and given only few but unequivocal indications
of its approaching fierceness, now burst forth with ter-
rific violence. Its course was appalling and irresistible.
Unhappy France, where had been fostered the demon
of infidelity, was the scene of its greatest devastations.
The altar and the throne were cast down ; and, for a
time, the spirit of evil and desolation reigned trium-
phant. Soon it spread on every side, and involved the
CASTLE AND TOWN. 161
continent in a state of confusion and terror. England
escaped^ however, chiefly on account of its fitvoured
isolated position. But its rulers, too, stood aghast, and
trembled lest it should partake in the common disaster.
Threats of invasion, and dread of a civil insurrection
alarmed the court. Great, indeed, must have been the
panic which led to the conversion of the country into
one vast military camp. Tet such was the fact. In
every town and place, associations were organized for the
purpose of preventing the occurrence of a revolution,
either by the machinations of secret enemies at home
or open ones abroad, for the support of the king and
constitution, and for the protection of private property.
In the spring of 1798, the gentlemen of Tamworth
formed a voluntary armed association, supported at
their own expense, and by free contributions: and to
which the members for the borough very liberally
afforded their aid. It consisted of a troop of cavalry,
numbering nearly forty men, commanded by T. B.
Paget, esq., bf Bole-hall ; and two companies of infantry,
containing one himdred and twenty men, under the com-
mand of Walter Lyon, and Edward Dickenson, esqres.
. On the 26th of June, in the following year, there
was a grand festival at Tamworth, on the occasion of
the presentation of a standard and colours to the asso-
ciation. They were first consecrated at the altar of the
Church, by the minister, in the presence of the princi-
pal gentlemen of the town and neighbourhood, and of
innumerable spectators. . They were given by the mar-
chioness Townshend, and the lady of Robert Peel, esq.,
to the different corps, when assembled on the Stafford-
shire-moor. But, besides by the organization of these
forces, the inhabitants of the town and parish rendered
152 TAMWORTH
asBistanoe to the welfare of their country, by con-
tributing to the general subscription which was ndsed
throughout the kingdom in aid of the supplies granted
to his majesty for the defence of the nation, in 1798.
The siun raised in the town amounted to 363/. 19«. 6d. ;
besides £7/. 9«. 4^(/. collected at the Church-doors on
the day appointed as a general fast and time of humi-
liation. In the parish, 155/. Is, 6d. was added.* The
voluntary armed association, in 1809, was replaced by a
local militia. This force was not disbanded until all
fears of invasion had vanished, in 1815 ; after the pride
of France had been humiliated, by her fidl from the
high position which she had dared to assume.
Diuing the period, when private individuals and
companies were allowed to circulate tokens, two Tam-
worth pieces were struck, in 1799. One of them is a
penny of John Harding, calico-printer; the other, a
half-penny of the rev. Francis Blick, vicar of the
parish. They were coined rather as specimens of the
art, and for exchange amongst friends, than for circula-
tion. In point of workmanship, they are very excellent,
and creditable to those persons engaged upon them.
The dies of Harding's penny-token were by Hancock.
Four dozen pieces were struck in copper, and six im-
pressions in silver. Of the latter, two are now in the
collection of sir George Chetwynd, hart., of Grendon-
hall, Warwickshire. The third, we believe, is in the
possession of William Salt, esq., of Russell-square, Lon-
don. The fourth was piirchased at the sale of the rev.
F. Slick's collection, on the 1st of July, 1843, by the
publisher. The fifth is in the possession of Miss Hard-
ing, of BonehiU. And the sixth was in the possession
of the late Mr. Shepherd, of Liverpool ; now uncertain.
1 See Appendix :~Note 19.
CASTLE AND TOWN.
153
The idea for the edge of the token was evidently
taken from the famous petition-crown executed by Tho-
mas Simon^ in the reign of Charles II.
Of the rev. F. Blick's halfpenny^ the dies were by
Wyon. Six dozen pieces were struck in copper^ and
half a dozen in silver; so Mr. Blick told sir George
Chetwynd, to whom we are indebted for our infor-
mation.
Those in silver were thus disposed of. 1 — Presented
by Mr. Blick to the late marquis Townshend, in 1799.
2 — ^Thomas Sharp, esq., of Coventry. It was sold to
Mr. Shepherd, of Liverpool ; afterwards to Mr. Thomas ;
and, in March, 1844, it was bought by Mr. Tindall,
clerk to Messrs. Southby and Co., on commission, for
the right hon. — Butler. 3 — Thomas Welsh, esq., of
Birmingham ; now in the possession of George Barker,
w
154 TAMWORTH
esq., of the same place. 4 — ^William Nickson, of Coren-
try; now uncertain. 5— In Mr. Blick's private cabi-
net ; it was purchased, in 1843, by sir George Chetwynd.
6 — John Harding, esq., of BonehiU ; it is now in the
collection of sir George Chetwynd, at Grendon-halL
The fidelity of the engravings has rendered unneces-
sary a particular description of these tokens.
In 1807, the town underwent very great improve-
ment, by the placing of flags and curb-stones along
the pathways of all the principal streets. The expenses
were defrayed by a general subscription, aided by
liberal donations from the parliamentary representa-
tives, sir Robert Peel, bart, and major-general William
Loftus.
Within the course of the present century, several
useful institutions have arisen in Tamworth. In 1804,
a Permanent library was established, which, in a few
3^ars contained upwards of two thousand volumes,
circulated amongst subscribers paying an entrance-fee
of two guineas and a half, and an annual sum of one
gidnea. In 1823, a Savings-bank was introduced into
the town, and has ever since continued in a flourishing
state. And, in 1831, a society was founded for the
benefit and encouragement of those, whose occupation
or taste led them to adopt horticultural pursuits. The
acknowledged want of a literary institution had, several
times, been attempted to be supplied; but all endea-
vours were unsuccessful, until within the last few
years; when, by the exertions of sir Robert Peel, one
was formed and rendered permanent. Tamworth, how-
ever, received a considerable check in its progress, by
the failure of two private commercial banks, in the
years 1816, and 1819 ; when many inhabitants sustained
CASTLE AND TOWN. 155
ezoeedingly heavy losses. It was some time before the
town leoovered fix)m this blow.
One of the most important occurrences in the recent
history of Tamworth^ is the alteration produced in
the political constitution of the town by the Seform-billj
passed in 18S2. The provisions of this statute are too
well known to need recapitulation here. It is sufficient
to observe that it ultimately removes the right to vote
fixim those who merely pay scot and lot^ and iuvests
the power exclusively iu persons possessing houses of
the value of 10/. a year and upwards. At the same
time^ the limits of the borough were extended to the
whole parish around.
In 1835^ the '' Tamworth 'Gas-light and Coke Com-
pany*' was established. Its capital was fixed at 2000/.^
divided into 200 shares of 10/. each. The inhabitants
adopted in 1839 the act, Srd and 4th Will. IV. cap. 90,
by which means the town is well lighted. The gas-works
were erected at the lower end of Bolebridge-street.
The Municipal Corporations Reform Act, passed in
1835, about the termination of the year, it came into
operation. At the time of the enquiries by the par-
liamentary commissioners, not long before its dissolu-
tion, the old governing body possessed an annual
income of 147/. 19«. The rents of four houses within
the borough, held from time immemorial, amounted to
91/. Another house, purchased twelve years previously,
was let for S8/. ; and a pew in the Church, belonging
to it, for 1/. Is. Three more pews in the Church brought
6/. 6s.; and various chief rents and ground-rents, 11/.
12s. And the piccage, stallage, and other profits of
two fidrs or market-money averaged 10/. The revenues
were expended in the repairs of the streets, Market-hall,
156 TAHWORTH
and Bridges, and in the payment of a few small
salaries for officers. There was a surplus of lOOf. in
the chamberlains' hands. Some privileges of the corpo-
ration had been allowed to fell into disuse. The three
weeks' court of record had not been held within the
memory of any man ; nor had the power of holding
quarter-sessions been exercised for a considerable period.
The reasons assigned were, the want of a sufficient gaol,
and the wish to avoid the burden of wmintaiTtiTig such
an establishment. It was a general opinion that the
expense would outbalance the cost of sending the pri-
soners to the county-towns. But in no respect did
it appear that the corporation had abused its powers,
or been guilty of simstei^ transactions. Such, unforta-
ately, was not invariably the case throughout England.
By the new bill, the government of the town is now
vested in a mayor, four aldermen, and twelve council-
lors. Under them, are appointed a town-clerk, auditors,
assessors, and the minor officers required by the act'
But, under its operation, the inhabitants of the town
have lost one of their greatest ancient privileges.
They are no longer exempt from serving on juries,
without the limits of the borough. On the particulars
of this statute, it is unnecessary to dwell. Its funda-
mental principle is that of restoring to the people gene-
rally, a voice in their own local government — a liberty,
which had been principally intrenched upon, by sove-
reigns of the house of Tudor.
On the 4th of August, 1839, the Birmingham and
Derby Junction Railroad was first entirely opened.
It was commenced three years previously, and passes
close to the town, on the eastern side.
1 Sec Appendix : -Kotc 20.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 157
In the autumn of 1889^ Adelaide, the queen-dowager,
widow of William lY., during the period of her visit
to the right honourable sir Robert Peel, bart., at his
seat, Drayton-manor, fietvoured Tamworth with her
presence. Of this event, the inhabitants of the town
had previous notice; and meetings were held and
committees organized for the purpose of making prepa-
rations to give a fitting reception to her Majesty. Early
in the morning of the 12th of November, — ^e day ap-
pointed for the visit, — ^Tamworth exhibited a very
pleasing and animated aspect. Grreat numbers of
strangers resorted hither. Flags were placed upon the
steeple of the Church, the tower of the Castle, and
upon the Town-hall. With others, the principal inha-
bitants decorated their houses; many of which were
ornamented with flowers and evergreens, and appropri-
ate emblems. The Church-bells sent forth merry and
melodious peals, at intervals throughout the day.
About two o'clock a royal salute of twenty-one guns
firom the Castle, announced the approach of her Majesty.
The procession advanced from Drayton-manor through
Fazeley. First, there came a number of gentlemen on
horseback, four abreast; then a carriage and four, in
which were lord Adolphus Fitz-clarence ; earl Howe,
lord-chamberlain of the Queen-dowager's household ; the
earl of Denbigh, master of the horse; and Mr. Wood,
her chaplain. The next was the royal carriage, drawn
by four bay-horses. It contained queen Adelaide,
accompanied by lady Clinton, and sir Robert and lady
PeeL In the carriage and four which immediately
followed, were the countess of Denbigh, Miss Peel, and
Miss Mitchell, her Majesty's maid of honour. In the
fourth carriage, were lady Jane Peel and family. The
158 TAHWORTH
procession was closed by a long line of curiages be-
longing to different gentlemen of the town and neigb-
bourbood. Sir H. Seymour, tbe rigbt bon. WilUam
Tates Peel, and Edmund Peel, esq., aooompanied tbe
royal party. Near tbe foot of Lady-bridge, at tbe limits
of tbe town, a large triimipbal ardi, between tbirty
and forty feet in beigbt, and twenty feet in span, bad
been erected. It was made to resemble stone-woik,
was entwined witb wreatbs of evergreens, and bore tbe
inscription — ^weloomb qubbn adslaidb. On tbe sum-
mit, was placed a decorated crown; and on eadi side
of it was a flag, upon wbicb were emblazoned tbe
royal arms. As the procession passed slowly beneatb
ibis arcb, loud acdamations arose from tbe dense
tbrong of spectators; and tbe band played tbe great
national antbem of " Grod save tbe Queen." Tbe royal
party proceeded along Market-street, and baited at tbe
Town-ball, wbere tbe members of tbe town-council, in
tbeir robes, stood awaiting tbe arrival of ber Majesty.
Tbere, tbe mayor, Jobn Hall, esq.; tbe ex-mayor, Wil-
liam Parsons, jun., esq.; and tbe town-clerk, Francis
Willington, esq., were severally introduced to the Queen.
Sbe was graciously pleased to express to the mayor ber
pleasure and satisfaction at the handsome reception
which she experienced from the inhabitants of Tam-
worth. The mayor and council, preceeded by tbe
horsemen, then accompanied the royal party along
Greorge-street and Colehill, to the Church. There the
Queen-dowager and her suit alighted, to inspect this
noble building. The rev. Francis Blick, with other
clergymen, received her majesty at the western entrance,
and conducted her through the edifice; which was
densely crowded with ladies.
CA8TI.E AND TOWN. 159
After viewing the Churchy the loyal party returned
to their carriages^ and the procession passed along
Church-street, and lichfield-street. Every window was
occupied by persons. Another salute was now fired
firom the guns at the Castle. At the limits of the
old borough, an arch had been erected by Mr. Blick,
bearing the inscription — ^we bid tot; god speed. Here
the horsemen filed off on each side of the road, and
the town-council took leave of her Majesty. As the
Queen passed on, the horsemen raised a hearty cheer.
The royal party returned to Drayton-manor by Hopwas.
On the following day, her Majesty forwarded a letter
through earl Howe, to the vicar, expressing the grati-
fication which had been afforded to her on this occa*
sion. The sum of 25/. was enclosed, for distribution
amongst the poor, during the ensuing winter.^
But the most renowned occurrence in the history of
Tamworth, since the reign of James I., was the visit
which her gracious Majesty, queen Victoria, made to
the town and neighbourhood, during her progress
through the midland counties of England, in the
autumn of 1843. The expectation that she would ho-
nour the first lord of the treasury with her presence, at
Drayton-manor, had, for some weeks previously, caused
great excitement here. When the pleasing anticipation
was confirmed, and the time made known to the gen-
tlemen of the town, the most energetic measures were
taken by them, to welcome their Queen, in a manner
due to her exalted rank, as sovereign of the realms.
A public meeting was immediately called, on the 21st
of November, the mayor presiding, for the purpose of
considering and arranging the plans for her reception.
1 TlieCTpcMcg ■ttcndant npon fhi« vlait were defrayed by a public Bobecription. They
amovnted altogeUier to abont 60f .
160 TAICWORTH
A subscription to defray the expenses, was oommenoed
in the room; which ultimately amounted to nearly
400/. Many gentlemen^ more especially sir Robert
Peel, made very handsome donations.
In the decorations of the town^ very great taste
was manifested by those, under the direction of whom
the arrangements were conducted. Even the archi-
tectural defects in the line of streets, along which
her Majesty would pass, were rendered subsenient to
some good purpose. At the station of the Birmingham
and Derby Junction Kailroad^ where the Queen would
alight, a neat pavilion, carpeted with crimson doth,
was erected; and a flight of broad steps carried down
the embankment. Throughout nearly the whole length
of the road from the station to the town, platforms
were erected on each side, for the convenience of
spectators. About midway along this line, by the
King's Ditch, at the limits of the old borough a large
and elegant triumphal arch was erected, in imitation
of stone-work. It bore, amidst a profrision of embellish-
ments, and wreaths of evergreens, profiles of the Queen
and Prince, and the fleur-de-liz. It was surmounted by
a crown, the royal standard, and several flags. A se-
cond but much smaller arch was placed between (reorge-
street and the Market-place. A third one was situated
on the south side of the Town-hall. It bore the
legend — ^England's hopb; and upon it were placed the
arms of the town properly emblaasoned, — ^Erm., a fleur-
de-liz Or. Supporters, — ^two mermaids ppr., each hold-
ing in her hand a palm branch: these are emblematical
of the two streams.^ The fourth and last arch was
1 Hie dcTloe npoD the Mtl of the town Is difltovDt Itooiiitetimerdyofalleiir.de
lis, diapered all over with small flowers: and it bears around the inscription, — sio
BTROI . DB . TAMWORTR . IN . COMITAT . WARWIC . BT . 8TAP . The Seal ttSClf, iS made
of silver; and was presented to the corporation by sir Thomas Tbynne, bait., whilst
he was higrh-steward.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 161
placed at the foot of Lady-bridge. It was designed so
as to harmonize with the architecture of the Castle^
which stood in noble grandeur above the scene. It
consisted of two square towers with a large arch
stretched between^ and bore many ornaments. The
decorations of priyate houses by individual exertions, it
would be totally impossible to describe. It suffices to
say that every place, which at all commanded a view
of her Majesty's prioress, was completely covered with
flags, garlands of flowers and evergreens, and designs of
every kind. The well devised emblem, and the short
but appropriate motto, indicated the fervent feeling by
which all were actuated, and their deep devotion and
attachment to their beloved Queen. All united in the
work, and the spirit of party was completely banished
from the joyous scene.
On Tuesday, the S8th of November, her Majesty and
prince Albert commenced their progress to Drayton-ma-
nor. At five minutes past nine o'clock in the morning,
they quitted Windsor-castle, in a travelling carriage
and four. They directed their course through Windsor,
Eton, Slough, and Uxbridge, to Watford. During
this time, they were accompanied by a detachment of
the first regiment of life-guards. The suite in attend-
ance, who occupied two carriages, consisted of lady
Portman, lady in waiting; the hon. Miss liddeU, and
the hon. Amelia Murray, maids of honour; the earl of
Jersey, master of the horse; the marquis of Ormonde,
lord in waiting; the hon. George Edward Anson,
treasurer to prince Albert ; major-general William
Wemmys, equerry in waiting ; and colonel Bouverie,
equerry in waiting to his royal Highness. At the Wat-
ford-station, on the London and Birmingham Railroad >
162 TAMWORTH
her Majesty was reoeived by many of the company of
that line. There a delay of five-and-twenty minutes
took place, whilst the carriages were being transferred
to the trucks. From thence, at twenty minutes past
eleven o'clock, the royal party proceeded by special train,
towards Hampton-in-Arden. A splendid carriage had
been provided for the Queen and Prince. The day,
which at first had appeared very gloomy, and threat-
ened to terminate in rain, had cleared up; and soon
the sun burst forth in all its wonted splendour. It
does not come within the limits of our work to detail
the reception, with which the Queen met on her jour-
ney to Hampton. She arrived there, after a short delay
at Wolverton, in order to partake of refreshments, at
twenty minutes past two o'clock in the aftiemoon. At
that place, the directors of the Birmingham and Derby
Railroad waited on her Majesty, and accompanied her
along their line to Tamworth.
Before the morning's dawn, on this day, immense
numbers of persons flocked into Tamworth. They came
from every part of the country, for twenty miles
around. There was soon a scene of bustle and commo-
tion, which the town can scarcely ever have previously
witnessed, even in the days of its greatest celebrity.
About noon, the streets through which her Majesty
would direct her course, became intensely thronged.
Every accessible place in the houses and buildings was
occupied. As the appointed hour approached, the
centre of the streets was with difficulty cleared by
the Yeomanry and Staffordshire police, to permit a free
passage. At twenty minutes to three o'clock, the right
hon. sir Robert Peel arrived at the station, to await
his illustrious visitors. He was accompanied by lug
CASTLE AND TOWN. 16S
son Mr. Sobert Peel^ the duke of Bucdeuch^ earl
Talbot^ and lord Ingestre. The pavilion was occupied
by numerous other gentlemen. About the same time^
the corporation and clergy took their station on a
platforni that was erected for them. It stood upon
the right hand side of the first triumphal arch^ within
the limits of the municipal borough^ and was covered
with crimson cloth. On the summit of this arch^ by
the standard^ a trumpeter of the Staffordshire Yeomanry
was placed^ to annoimce the moment when the royal
train should come into sight. All were now in a state
of the most eager expectation. Over the vast mul-
titude, an imusual silence reigned, indicating the in*
tense feeling which suspense created.
After the lapse of a short time, the shrill trumpet's
voice echoed over the town. Immediately the royal
standard, presented for the occasion by lord Charles
Townshend, was unfurled on the turret of the Castle,
a salute was fired from the cannon on the green
beneath, and the Church-bells commenced their merriest
peaL At a quarter to three o'clock, the train stopped
at the station, the journey of fifteen miles firom Hamp-
ton having been performed in twenty minutes. On
alighting, her Majesty was received by sir Robert Peel
to whom she immediately bowed and presented her
hand. The right honourable baronet conducted her
to the carriage, which was awaiting below ; and the
party then left the station-yard.
The road to the town was kept clear by the Stafford-
shire Royal Yeomanry-cavalry. Three troops of them,
under the direction of colonel Monkton the com-
mander, major Peel, and major Majendie, served as an
escort. Sir Robert Peel, the duke of Buccleuch, and
164 TAHWORTH
the other noblemen followed upon horseback. Thomas
Shawe Manley, esq., high-sheriff of Staffordshire, and
many other gentlemen, also accompanied the royal
party. Immediately that her Majesty and the Prince
appeared into the public road, they were welcomed with
the most enthusiastic shouts, which arose on every side.
For the time, every other feeling seemed to be absorbed
in that of unbounded loyalty. The Queen expressed her
pleasure by continually bowing to the multitudes.
Amidst re-iterated cheering, and the waving of hats and
handkerchiefb, her Majesty proceeded slowly along the
road. On arriving at ihe arch, the royal carriage was
drawn up close to the platform, where the corporation
and clergy were stationed. Thomas Bramall, esq., the
mayor, now advanced, and, in a few words, presented
the mace to the Queen, surrendering with it his local
authority, at the presence of the fountain-head of
government. The Queen laid her hand on the emblem
of office, but was pleased immediately to return it, vrith
the gracious compliment that it could not be in better
hands. The royal party proceeded through the town.
They directed their course through Gteorge-street ; the
Market-place, on the south side of the Town-hall;
Market-street ; and Lady-bridge-bank. The Queen and
Prince rode with the carriage open, so that they were
well seen by the crowds. As they passed along, the
acclamations of the multitude increased ; and a scene of
the most animated description presented itself. A tre-
mendous rush took place, in order to gain a second
sight of the Queen and Prince as they quitted the town.
At the foot of Lady-bridge, the corporation, clergy, and
gentlemen of the town, took leave of the august travellers.
Another salute was now fired from the cannon on the
CASTIiB AND TOWN. 165
Castle-green. Quickening their speed, the royal party
directed their course by Bonehill and the Watling-street ;
and, at a little more than half past three o'clock^ they
arrived at Drayton-manor, where royal standards were
immediately raised on the tower, and other parts of
the mansion.
Her Majesty on alighting was received by lady Peel,
and numerous distinguished ladies. With the Prince
she retired to the apartments reserved for their accom-
modation, to partake of refreshments after their long
journey. The whole of the south front of sir Robert
Peel's noble mansion was appropriated to the use of
his royal guests. The suite of apartments consisted of
a breakfSut-room, drawing-room, state-bed-room, and
four other connecting rooms. All, especially the draw-
ing-room, were fitted up in a very chaste and tasteful
manner. A congruity between the ornaments and the
Elizabethan architecture of the building, was observed.
The state-bed was very fine ; the hangings were of
chintz lined throughout with pink silk.
At six o'clock, the noble circle at the Manor was in-
creased by the arrival of his grace the duke of Wel-
lington, who came direct from London by the railroads.
Archdeacon Lonsdale, the bishop elect of Lichfield, also
travelled to Tamworth by the same train : he took up his
abode at the house of Edmimd Peel, esq., at Bonehill.
Shortly after seven o'clock, the bishop elect of Lichfield;
Thomas Shawe Manley, esq., high-sheriff of Stafford-
shire ; Thomas BramaU, esq., mayor of Tamworth ; and
a deputation from Lichfield, arrived at Drayton. When
her Majesty and his royal Highness entered the library,
at half past seven, these gentlemen presented loyal ad-
dresses to them. The following were delivered from the
borough of Tamworth.
166 TAMWOBTH
'' To the Queen's Most ExoeUent Majesty.
The humble Address of the Mayor^ Magistrates,
Aldeimen^ Councillors, and Burgesses of the Borough
of Tamworth."
" Most Gracious Sovereign, — ^We, your Majesty's most
fidthful and dutiful subjects, the Mayor, Magistrates,
Aldermen, CoundllorSj and Burgesses of the ancient
Borough of Tamworth,— once the &voured seat of Roy-
alty,— ^beg your Majesty's gracious permission to offer the
sincere expression of devoted loyalty and attachment,
which we at all times feel towards your Majesty ; and of
the sentiments of delight excited in our hearts by your
Majesty's august presence amongst us.
May the Supreme Disposer of all events, be pleased
to shed upon your Majesty and your Koyal Consort a
continuance and increase of every blessing. May He
protect your Majesty firom all harm, and long preserve
your Majesty in health, for the wealth and happiness of
these realms. "
" To His Royal Highness Prince Albert. "
" May it please your Royal Highness, — We, the
Mayor, Magistrates, Aldermen, Councillors, and Bur-
gesses of the Borough of Tamworth, deeply impressed
with the many and exalted virtues which adorn the
character of your Royal Highness, approach with senti-
ments of the highest respect, to give expression to the
unfeigned regard and admiration, we so strongly and
justly entertain towards your Royal Highness.
We cannot but feel proud of the distinction conferred
upon our ancient and ever loyal Borough of Tamworth,
by the visit with which your Royal Highness has been
pleased to honour us.
That your Royal Highness may be preserved through
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 167
a kmg life of health, prosperity, and happiness, is the
prayer of Her Majesty's most dutiful and ever loyal
subjects. "
The Bishop elect, then presented loyal and affectionate
addresses from the rural dean and clergy of Tamworth
and its neighbourhood.
After this ceremony had been concluded, the Queen
was conducted by sir Robert Peel, through the picture-
gallery into the dining-room. Prince Albert and lady
Peel, the duke of Rutland and the duchess of Buccleuch,
with the rest, followed. A very sumptuous dinner was
provided; and covers were laid for twenty-one persons.
The Prince occupied the seat next the Queen, and the
host and hostess were placed on the right and left
hands. The guests besides were, the duke of Wel-
Ungton ; the duke and duchess of Buccleuch ; the duke
of Rutland; the earl of Jersey; earl Talbot, lord-lieu-
tenant of the county of Stafford ; the bishop elect of
Lichfield; the hon. Miss Paget; lady Portman; the hon.
George Edward Anson; Robert Peel, esq., eldest son of
the premier; major-general Wenmiys; colonel Bouverie;
William Stratford Dugdale, esq., M. P. for North War-
wickshire; Thomas Shawe Manley, esq. ; Thomas Bramall,
esq.; and lieutenant-colonel Monkton. The high-sheriff
occupied the top of the table, and the mayor of Tam-
worth sat opposite to him. The dinner lasted for an
hour and a half. At its conclusion, the right honour-
able Baronet proposed the health of her Majesty, which
was duly drunk. Immediately aft;erwards, the Queen,
with lady Peel and rest of the ladies, withdrew into
the library. There her Majesty spent some time in
viewing many of the finest efforts of art in painting and
sculpture.
168 TAMWORTH
A little befofe eleven o'clock, the Queen and Prince
retired to their private apartments.
On Wednesday morning, the S9th of November, the
Queen and Prince, after break£uting together, at eight
o'clock, in their private room, walked, for a short time,
upon the terraces. At half past nine o'ckick, prince
Albert, attended by sir Robert Peel, the duke of
Buccleuch, major-general Wemmys, colonel Bouverie,
and the hon. George Edward Anson, visited Tamworth
Church. The rev. Robert C. Savage, vicar, with the
curate and churchwardens, was in attendance there.
After his Royal Highness had inspected this venerable
edifice, he went to the railroad-station, and proceeded,
by special train, to Birmingham, to view some of the
principal manufactories and public edifices of that town.
But sir Robert Peel and the duke of Buccleuch
returned to Drayton-mauor.
At eleven o'clock, her Majesty, with lady and Miss
Peel, the duchess of Buccleuch, lady Portman, and the
hon. Miss Paget, walked for half an hour, along the
terraces, on the south and west sides of the mansion.
They then visited the flower-gardens, £Birm-yard, and
dairy; and afterwards went over the hothouses and
kitchen-gardens.
A little after two o'clock, sir Robert Peel rode down
to the Tamworth-station, to receive many other il-
lustrious visitors. Adelaide, the Queen-dowager, with
prince Edward of Saxe-Weimar, earl Howe, and the
countess of Brownlow, arrived by special train, and
were escorted to Drayton by the Staffordshire Yeomanry.
After a very pleasing reception at Birmingham, his
royal Highness returned to Drayton about half past
four o'clock. To the royal circle at dinner, besides the
CASTLE AND TOWN. 169
Queen-dowager and her attendants, there were added
the earl of Warwick, lord lieutenant of the county of
Warwick; discount Ingestre; the hon. and rev. Henry
Edward John Howard, dean of Lichfield; and Charles
Newdegate Newdegate, esq., M. P. for North Warwick-
shire.
This day, at Tamworth, was spent in merriment and
festivity. A dinner was provided in the Town-hall,
at which the mayor, corporation, and principal gentle-
men of the neighbourhood, were present
On Thursday morning, the Queen, having breakfiEisted,
at half past seven o'clock, walked out upon the ter-
races, with his royal Highness. The Prince, after-
wards, accompanied by sir Robert Peel, the duke of
Buccleuch, the earl of Jersey, and the hon. G. E. Anson,
went out to sport. He first went in a boat on the water,
when he brought down two wild dudks ; but he soon re-
sorted to the easier and more profitable plan of shooting
in the preserves. There he killed sixty pheasants, twenty-
five hares, eight rabbits, and a woodcock. About two-
hundred head of game were killed by the whole party.
After two hours and a half of sport, the Prince returned
to the Manor, and partook of luncheon. At two
o'clock, the royal visitors proceeded in closed carriages
to Lichfield, in order principally to view its beautiful
cathedral.
By five o'clock, the party had again arrived at Dray-
ton. After dinner, there was a select reception in the
picture-gallery, when many gentlemen and ladies were
severally presented to her Majesty, and spent the re-
mainder of the evening at the mansion. Those who
were present at this time besides the Queen and Prince
Albert, were, Adelaide, the Queen-dowager ; Edward,
prince of Saxe- Weimar ; Arthur Wellesley, duke of
170 TAMWORTH
Wellington ; Douglas Scott, duke of Buodeuch; Charlotte
Ann Scott^ duchess of Buccleuch; John Henry Manners,
duke of Rutland ; Heneage Finch, earl of Aylesford ;
John, earl Brownlow; Emma Sophia, countess of
Brownlow ; William Legge, earl of Darmouth ; Richard
William Penn Curzon, earl Howe; Greorge Yilliers,
earl of Jersey ; lady Portman ; the right hon. sir Robert
Peel ; Julia, lady Peel ; Robert Peel, esq. ; Miss EKza
Peel ; the hon. Gteorge Edward Anson ; the hon.
colonel Fulke Greville Howard ; the hon. Henrietta
Elizabeth Howard; major-general William Wemmys;
lieut.-colonel Everard William Bouverie ; captain Edward
Henry k Court, R. N-, M. P. for Tamworth ; William
Stratford Dugdale, esq., M. P. ; Harriett Ella Dugdale ;
lady Jane Peel; the dean of Lichfield; Mis. Howard;
J. D. Watts Russell, esq., M. P. for North Staffordshire;
capt. Charles Hause Jay, R. N. ; the rev. Robert C.
Savage, vicar of Tamworth; the rev. W. M. Lally, L.L.D.,
rector of Drayton-Basset ; the rev. Cyprian Thompson,
incumbent of Fazeley ; Thomas Greorge Lomax, esq.,
mayor of Lichfield ; and Nathaniel Thorn, esq. At
half past eleven o'clock, her Majesty and the Queen-
dowager retired into their respective rooms.
During the afternoon, the poor of Tamworth, amoun-
ting to upwards of two thousand persons, were feasted.
For this purpose, the Castle, Town-hall, and National
School-rooms were occupied. There were provided for
the occasion, two thousand pounds of beef, six hundred
pounds of pudding, and two thousand two hundred and
fifty quarts of ale, besides bread and potatoes in pro-
portion. Dinners were also given at Fazeley, Wilnecote,
Wigginton, and the other hamlets in the parish, to the
working classes.
On Friday, the 1st of December her Majesty and
CASTLE AND TOWN. 171
his royal Highness concluded their sojourn at Drayton-
manor. At twenty minutes past ten^ they departed
from the hospitable mansion of sir Robert Peel, on
their way to Chatsworth, in Derbyshire, the seat of the
duke of Devonshire. They were escorted by the Soyal
Staffordshire Yeomanry, the tenantry of sir Robert Peel,
and the officers of the county constabulary force. Sir
Robert Peel, himself, and the high-sheriff of Stafford-
shire, rode immediately in front of the royal carriage.
In the Manor-park, the children of the schools at Dray-
ton-Basset and Fazeley were drawn up, to greet the
Queen and the Prince : and the whole way was lined
with spectators, anxious to obtain a final glance. The
royal party proceeded through Fazeley, where a large
arch had been elected, and the houses decorated. The
streets of Tamworth were again crowded. Appropriate
changes had been made in the decorations of the tri-
umphal arches at the two extremities of the town. The
one by Lady-bridge bore, on different parts, the mottos
FARSWSLL, — TAHWOBTH'S LOYALTY AND DEEP DEVOTION
OHEET YE WELL,— <K)D BLESS YE, — and OUB HEABTS OO
WITH YE. Across the other by the King's Ditch, a
banner was suspended, on which were inscribed the
words, WE BID YE OOD SPEED. The Queen and Prince
passed along the same way, by which they went through
the town on Tuesday. At the last arch, they stopped
to take leave of the mayor and corporation, who there
awaited them. Her Majesty was then gracious pleased
thus to address the municipal authorities. ''We thank
you most heartily for the gratifying reception We have
met with, in your loyal borough : and be assured that
We have experienced great satisfaction and delight, from
the strong feeling of attachment manifested by you on
this occasion." The mayor, in reply, said, " Most gra-
172 TAMWOBTH
dous Sovereign, allow your Majesty's gratefiil and ever
faithAil servant, the mayor, to express to your Majesty,
on behalf of the council and inhabitants of Tamworth,
how highly we esteem the honour conferred upon us, by
the presence of your Majesty and your Majesty's royal
Consort amongst us. May GrOD bless and protect your
Majesty from all harm, and preserve your Majesty in
health, long — ^very long — to reign over a free, loyal,
and happy people." The Queen and Prince bowed
in return ; and the carriage moved on. At the railroad-
station, the frdl regimental band of the Yeomanry cavalry
was in attendance. Her Majesty now took leave of
sir Robert, Lady, and Miss Peel, and proceeded to
Chatsworth, by a special train.
Immediately after the departure of her Majesty, sir
Robert Peel, by command, rode back to the town-
council, who waited to welcome him, in order to ex-
press to the inhabitants through the mayor, the Queen's
satisfaction at the manner in which her Majesty and
her royal Consort had been received in Tamworth.
Later in the day, the right honourable Baronet made
the following official communication to the mayor.
" Drayton Manor, December Ist 184S.
"Sir,
I avail myself of the earliest oppor-
tunity, in obedience to the express command of the
Queen signified to me this morning, of conveying to
you Her Majesty's entire approbation of all the arrange-
ment made at Tamworth for the reception of her
Majesty, on the happy occasion of her Majesty's visit
to Drayton Manor.
CAffTLB AND TOWN. ITS
'^ Her Majesty expressed herself highly gratified by
the combination of perfect order -with the enthusiastic
demonstrations of loyalty and affectionate attachment
to Her Majesty's person.
'^ I need not say how happy I am to be enabled to
make this gracious commtmication, on the part of the
Soyereign^ to the chief Municipal Authority of the
Borough of Tamworth^ and through him to the inha-
bitants of the Town and adjoining Country.
'' I have the honor to be^
Sir,
Your faithful Servant.
ROBERT PEEL."
In the course of this day, the Queen-dowager, and
prince Edward of Saxe- Weimar, after having witnessed
the departure of her Majesty, left Drayton-manor, for
Gopsall, the seat of earl Howe. The duke of Wellington
followed the Queen, the same morning, by railroad.
In Tamworth, during the evening, a grand dinner
was given at the Town-hall, by the right honourable
sir Robert Peel, to colonel Monkton and the Stafford-
shire Yeomanry, in return for their constant services
and vnlling exertions during the abode of her Majesty
and her royal Consort at Drayton-manor. The festiv-
ities in this town, consequent upon the Queen's visit,
were not entirely concluded until the January following.
For the committee, organized for the purpose of con-
ducting the arrangements of the entertainments given
to the working people, liberally resolved to divide the
surplus of the money, remaining in their hands, amongst
the different schools in the town, to provide feasts for
the poor children there. The rest of the money was.
174 TAHWOBTH
therefore, distributed, according to the number of scho-
lars in each, between the schools, whether attached to the
Established Church, to the Ronuin Catholic Chapel, or
to the Meeting-houses of any class of Protestant dissenters
in Tamworth.
Long will the recollection of the visit of her gracious
Majesty and his royal Highness, her illustrious Consort,
be retained at Tamworth. And long, too, we trust,
will the intense and glowing feelings of derotion and
loyalty, manifested in this town, be remembered by one,
whom Providence has called to rule a nation of exalted
wealth and strength. Betwixt a sovereign who exercises
her power not by terror and oppression, but by gentle-
ness and love, and her people, mutual confidence and
attachment must ever exist, strengthened by acts of
condescension on her part. Such feelings, and these
alone, can the presence of her Majesty at Tamworth
have tended to engender and confirm.
THE NEW YORK
PU13UC LIBRARY
A8TOR, LENOX AND
TILDEN FOUNOATIONa.
STATE OF THE TOWN.
To trace the gradual alterations which have taken
place in the conditibn of Tamworth from an early
period to our own times, is a subject/, in a local point
of view, fraught with very great interest. The consider-
ation of these changes form the object of the present
portion of our history. We shall endeavour to portray
in detail the ancient state of the town ; in a light as
clear as the records which we have examined, will
permit, and then review the great improvements which
have been made, more especially within the last century
and a half. At the same time, it is our intention to
give other matters, arising out of our subject, which
may prove usefrd to, and worthy of the attention of,
the antiquary.
Church STREBT....In the time of Henry VIII., Leland
refers to Church-street as the principal one, and describes
it as lying, in the general direction of the building of
the town, by west and east; the north side, on which
is the Church, being in Staffordshire, and the south, in
the county of Warwick.^ In conformity with the usual
custom regarding the chief thoroughfare of a town, it was
often called High-street. Under that appellation, it is
noticed in 1389, and again in 1439.' It has, however,
in modem times, been superseded by the completion of
1 Itia., YOL IV, fol. isg b. S Court rolls, IS R. n,, 17 H. VI.
176 TAMWOBTH
the Market-place; and, although longer, it now ranks
inferior to it, both in width, and the general character
of the houses.
BuTCHEB St££ET....B7 this name was formerly desig-
nated the part of Church-street eastward of the Church-
yard.' The Butchery* lay dose by the residence of the
dean, in the angle between this street and Gxmgate.
June M, 14M:— *' aic*iw Dalton te TuBwoith» MBlor, mare*, . . raddit in nuta'
BiJUaor* .. vnu* Buxm* .. iftC In le Boduty, int* Bomc* Joh*ia Oofean. .. mb%
«sp*ta orlMtali. h wmit* oeel*le. ex pte ooddcnf } ft estand* m • tIa ngia rtq*
daoanat' de TMnworth : ad opnt RIen daltan fllQ md, ft Joh'e tsIs «ali. her* ft
MtiffB' rali lmp*p*m.**->'* Joh*M de Cotan de TuBwarth, tenior, redd* in mea* bdl'
TBQ' Bunec* .. lac* in le Bochery int' Bnr(i«* Beldewiai TtwyU, en p*te ortent,*
ft Bugec'Rlen Delton, een% expteooddent*j ft extend' ee • Yta regto Tsq* decaiMft*
de Itenworth : .. ad op* Blet Dalton de Tuawottli, neroen, ft Joh'e txIs etai. '^
The Swine-market appears to have been held here.
But, in this supposition, we are only guided by the
mention of its existence on the Staffordshire side of the
town, in 1S88, 1395, 1453, and 1505,^ and by the dr-
cumstance that the Butchery is now partly used for
that purpose. The rest is taken up by buildings, and
by a large edifice, once the Theatre, but lately converted
into a malt-house. In Io89, at the court-leet and view
of firank-pledge, held on the S6th of October, it was
ordered, under penalty of 40d., that the inhabitants by
the Swine-market should keep the gutter there, near
the pavements, clear, so that the path might not be
obstructed.'
Stoke Cross.... At the junction of Church-street, Gun-
gate, and Colehill, stood, until about the reign of Edward
YI., the Stone-cross, named so early as 1293.'
Coort-lect, Warwickahire, held Nov. M, iao4 :^ ««prea* q'd Joli*ea to Sadder iedt
perpieatQiam .. ^)*d le Stonenecraa i quia no* eit p*t* i*o distr*. "f Coait» held SepC s»
1S7S:— *'Cart' irrotol* InhecT'ba. Sdant fte.q*d Baldewyniis de nrevill, miles,
dedit fte. Ad*e Breton de Tamwoith. lie*d*. ft aaaign' •nia, ma* Borsac* .... ta
1 Dorothy Feirers* grant for Masa of reqniem. 9 Court rolls, 10 H. VI.— U42.
3 lb., 3 H. VI. 4 lb., 12, 19 R. II t SI H. Vl.i ai H. VII.
5 lb., 18 R. II. 6 lb.. S9 B. I. 7 lb., as B. 1.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 177
Com* 8t«flbrd*, p'at iaoet tpad le Stonoie Groi, int' t'nm p*d*ei Baldewyni, ex
▼na pte, ft t'nm quond*m Will*! Matthew, ez alt'a; ft extend' ee in longi'e a ria
leg* Tsq* fram Decani Eccl*ie coUenr* de Ta*worth Redd* inde Annuat*
p'd*co Baldewyno, b*ed% ft aarifu* saJs, vna* floran Rose, ad Pm Nat* b>e Joh*is
Baptiste **i
Concerning the Cross^ itself^ we find nothing recorded,
except an order made on the 12th of October, 1516,
that butchers should no more sharpen their hatchets or
knives upon it, under penalty of 12d. to be paid to the
common box of the town.' An ancient family appear
to have derived their surname from the proximity of
their dwelling to this venerable monument.'
Galfrid atte Cross or ad Cnicem.
!
Henry atte Cross, Margaret, 1317. Thomas atte Gross,
1995; and, in 1S34, chaplain, keeper of the
oneoftbe Joryofthe hoqiital of St. James
oourt-toet, Staff.sh. here, 1S04 to IS17.
Roger atte Cross, elect- William atte Cross,
ed. May, 1348, collector perpetual ricar of Al-
of minor toUs. rewas-church, 1350.
Ralph atte Cross,
chaphdn, 1303.
The Three Tuns Inn, at the end of Church-street,
is still known as the Stone-cross.
GuifOATE.... Passing northwards from the east end of
Church-street, is Gungate, or, as it was anciently
written, Gumpiyate or Gumpigate. In May, 1369, there
was a curious bye-law made, on the Warwickshire part
of the town, that no man or woman from Wales should
sell ale in this street, under liability of its being forfeited.^
At the court-leet, on the 12th of May, 1385, Philip de
Bedford was fined 4rf., " p' obstup' in Gu'pegate, ex-
opo'ito Rectore' eccl'ie de Bukkeby. '*' Gungate afforded
a surname to a family in early times ; but we have found
very little more than the bare names.
1 Coort roUs, 44 B. III. 9 lb., 8 H. VITI.
3 lb., S5 K. 1. ; 6, 1 1 E. II. ; 7> 31, S3, 85 E. III. 4 lb., 48 B. III. 5 lb., 7 R. H.
Z
178 TAMWORTH
iigtfe iao4. ii88» 1SS6.
\T7~zr: — ' -. I — ' .. r
AUec.- Jolm ds Pkhford. Joha, Mm mad Malta. MO*. Sbbw. ilpf .
aevend tSmn one lMir,iaos,iss0. i»ii.
ortbebtiUftoiitlie
WarwIckBhlreiide.
Besides these, we have the following: — Alan de Gum-
pigate, 1289, 1298; Henry, 1298, 1316; Ralph, 1S04;
Thomas, 1804, 1825; WiUiam, 1817, 1845; Amice, 1328;
and John, 1880, 1850.'
Gnngate is a long, broad, and tolerably regular street
The east side, where Guy's Almshouses are situated,
is in Warwickshire ; and the west, with the Free Grammar
School, in Staffordshire. In the latter part, we find
the " Gumppeyerde " mentioned in 1507 ;' but the
position of this place we have not ascertained.
Stony Lane.... The northern part of Gungate, and
the road continuing to the limits of the mimidpal
borough, where it branches into three ways, leading to
Ashby-de-la-Zouch, Wigginton and Edengale, Elford and
Burton-upon-Trent, retained, until very lately, its ancient
designation of Stony-lane.' The appropriateness of the
name was indisputable, when the road was proverbially
very dirty, irregular, and narrow; and the part of the
street consisted of a very few poor scatteied and thatched
cottages. But, within about the last twenty years, it
has been much widened, and very greatly improved.
Nearly all the old houses have disappeared; and a neat
street has been built. The foot-path, on the western
side of the road, beyond the houses, was formed along
the summit of a hill, and was defended by some old
wooden rails. But, it has been cut down to a .level
with the carriage-way. During the past year, a stone-
1 CoartrolU, 17toS4B. I.| StolQE. II.; 9tolO.,«SB. III. S lb.,S3H.VII.
s Penonbalatioii of th« bomffh, 1097*
CASTLB AND TOWN. 179
wall has been erected at the side; and the steep bank
bevelled off, in the same manner as, a few years ago,
had been done on the eastern side. The road is, there-
fore, inferior to none in the neighbourhood of Tamworth.
At the northern extremity of this road, on the left
hand side of the high-way, close to the spot where a
dump of trees stands, was a piece of land called Bayly's
grave, which belonged to the corporation until 1704,
when it was sold.^ From what circumstance it obtained
this name, we do not know. In the Parish-register, on
the 18th of July, 1655, is recorded the burial of " Thomas
Bayly, of Tamworth, who hanged himself. " It is pos-
sible that he was interred at this place, near the meet-
ing of the four roads.
Old Chubch LANE....Or, as it is now usually called.
New College-lane, ran from Gxmgate into the Church-
yard. But, in 1848, the path within the cemetary was
stopped by the Church-wardens. It is short, narrow,
consists of small houses on the south side alone, and
now forms a ''blind" lane.
In 1337, it is called '' Chirchelone. '" To it extended
the Deanery, before that building fell into decay; for,
in 1420, we find that John ELingshurst was fined Zd.,
** p* carte tymbr', in venell* v'c* eccle'am, sT) muro
decani."'
New Church LANE....This also passes firom Gungate
to the Church-yard, but northward of the last. It is
exceedingly probable that it is Schoolmaster's lane re-
corded, in 1384, as lying in Staffordshire.
Coort held Oct 91, 1J84:~ '« Joh*M Sadeler de Thamworth ren* h lona* reddit
biwui' balll'oi*, ad opai Joh'is de ClUton, capell', & Joh*}* Sadder, d'id', ha'da ft
Mdcn' anoi*, tiiii* Cutflac' .. lute Com* Staff', iac* in Skolemayataone, int' Vf
l^Anrjtty da TrjuOk, wm\ ez pte ma, ft Vf abbatiM* de FoUeswortb, ex p'te
•»% ^
1 Corporatton reoorda. 9 Court rolls, lO E. III. s lb., 7U.V.
4 Oonit roOs, 8 R. II.
180 TAMWOBTH
Where this lane can have been, unless it were here,
we are unable to conjecture. It must otherwise have
ceased to exist altogether. But the fact of there having
been a School-master's lane, is important. It shows that
there was some foundation for affording education, per-
haps the Grammar School, which had been established
for so great a length of time, that, at this early date,
it had attained a considerable degree of eminence in
the town.
Salteb Street or LAKE....In Staffordshire, runs pa-
rallel with the north part of Gungate, on the west side.
June ii, IS94 :— " Waltenis de Giunpegate In mia, q* loluitc teoftuit vna' Bmra'
In Saltantlons, md nocimmta* Itofto Tie.** March 17, ISU:— •'D*iia BnclNiiri
[da HMdfMhaUj.AMwtiaM de FoUetworth, ooncenit d*nis Hear* de PoUcsworth &
J6h*nl de Polleewortlu (Mpllit, qoodd* ten* in le Selt'done,. . *' October, 1S91 :— •< Rttd't
de Wycford, Gtp*U*t* rentt In plena cor* & r*dd* In man* baUi'or* Tna* plac' tr*, en'
edMc* rap*po*ltto,. . . .in Com* Staff*, in renclla q' dldt* le 8alt*slone ; int* ten* maTrl
Rof»i de Appelb7, & ten* q*nd* Hugon' le Bnirn: Ad op* Simon* de Wydbrd.
did, a he'd* iuor*...."!
Salter's-lane is now merely a cart-road, terminatiiig
at some brick-kilns, and bounded on each side by fine
and plentiful orchards.
Ald£Rgat£,....A corruption of the ancient name Eller-
gate or Elregate,' — ^passes from Gungate to the west
end of Church-street. About forty years ago, it was
very narrow, dirty, and irregular. It contained only a
few scattered houses in it, and was chiefly limited by
gardens and fields. On the east side, towards Gungate,
there was a large field, with several pits in it. Alder-
gate, however, has been rendered tolerably regular, wide,
and neat. Although it is not yet entirely filled with
houses, it has lost its designation as a lane, and has
assumed the higher and more honourable title of a
street. The Castle-orchard was situated on the west
side of it.
1 lb., n E. I. : 8 E. n. ; S B. III. S lb., S9 B. I. -1S94.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 181
St. John's STRSET....This is not improbably the Castle-
lane^ leading to gardens, and amongst them to the
Castle-orchard. Alexander de Frevile, on the feast of
St. Clement the pope, 1322, on the payment of 50«. of
silver, conceded to Simon de Wycford, clerk, for his
life, the garden called Castle-orchard, lying between El-
le^ate and the Walfurlong, and extending in length from
the land of William de Gropshull to the pool of the dean
of the Church ; with all the herbage and fruit growing
there, and the ditch between the garden and the Wal-
frurlong. But on the expressed condition that if, after
the lapse of five years, Alexander de Frevile or his
heirs, should pay to Simon de Wycford or his assignees,
in the coU^ate Church of Tamworth, the sum of
50*., the whole property should revert to its former
owner.' By the dean's pool, was situated the dean's
bam.' Both these have long disappeared.
St. John's street is very modem, and even now con-
sists only of houses on the south side. It is short, and
was built after the erection of the Catholic chapel; to
which it leads. The Meeting-house of the Independents
stands at the comer of it and Aldergate.
Cat LANE....Passing out of Aldergate towards the
Church, and mnning parallel with Church-street, was
once Cat-lane. It was sometimes called Parson's or
Priest's lane ; but this was not its most usual designation.
March », 1801 :— *< WiU'm'i de Hopewas, fir* & heres RobM de Hopewas de
naawoath, Tenit In Cur' & reddit in nuunu BaU'or* Tiiam placeam tene en' ed-
md^ anp'pocltis, .... in Tamworth, in Com' Staflbrd* p'at iaoet inf ten* Riclle
Whelere. ez p*te Tna, & ten* qnond' WIll*i de Ireland, ez alt'a; & extend* ae in
loBsttnd' a via, Begin riq* le P'sonedone . . . . Ad opna WiUH de Norton & Olino*
Clede, cnpeU'or', hered* it aadgn' suor* imp*pet*m. . . . £t anp' hoc renlt D'oa Hofo
de Hopewaa, canonicns eccl*ie Cathedral' lichefeld, flrat' iplna WiUH de Hopewas.
k fai plena S'tina ip'or* Wmi de Norton & Oliueri Clede, eapell' remialt, rdazanit,
k om* p* ae & heredib' inis imp>pet*m qoieta' damanit tota' Job ana' & dam«'
1 Conxt roOa Sft H. VI.,— 1457. s Indentoze, I8». s Court xolla, SO E. m.
182 TAMWORTH
qa« haboit aea qnoqnoinodo habere potnit in p'd'ce plaoee t'n cu* ediflcUs sup'-
posItU, ...." Cooit-leet, Nor. 15» 1379:— John Syenoote was fined 4d., becaoee
**oocap* eoltt' .. on* imo, t(1s]. In Oettealone ft anhtos mar* dmiteff)." Jnne 12,
14M : *' Thom't Archer de BannyBcham, flUna & herea Eadltbe, nnp> vxla WOn
Archer de Burmyncham, .... reddidit in man* BalH'or* de Tunwoith, ex p'te Com*
BUtfUiT imo* meenaK' .... pHit lacet in rioo Tocal* Chyrcheetrete, Jnxf le
Wesmetece, int* ten' qnond' Bien de BoUnhnll, ex vna pte, ft ten* qno*dam angnet*
Crek, ex al*tapite; ft extendit m aviaBeg' vaq* venella* Tocat* Catteslone : ad
Gpns Henrld Lesson, alias Tocat* moilef de Tsmworth, ft Joha'e TX'is elns, ....**
pet SI, 14M:— "Ad Tis* franc* .... Teait Thomas Oohnan .... ft reddit in man*
ball* .. Tnn* Bargag* ft Tnn* gazdinn', .... in Com' Btaff'i ft p'dict' mes' iac' in
cbnrcfaestret, int' ter* Com* Warr*, ex vna pte, ft t're quondam Joh*is Sadeler, ex
p*te alt*a, ft extend' ae a regie Yia Tsq' Psononeslane : p*diot* Tero gardinn* in
Fsononealane, int' t'r* qoond* Baldcwlni FTeTyU, miUt', ex pte Tna, ft t*r' BIcH
Dalton, ex p'te alt'a, ft extend' se a Psonedane Tsq' ad t'r* qnond' p'dict* Baldewtaii
nmryll: ad opas Johls Oobnan ** And in 1455:— "Joh* Ccdman, fllins lliome
Oolman,....redd' in man' ball' vnu' Borgagin' cn'gardino adiac': ft diet' Bnrg* iac'
in Tloo TOC' Chnrchestret inf Burg* Comitlsse de Salopp', ex pte yna, ft
ten' Hnmph* Jacobe, ex pte airaj ft extend* a via regia Tsq' Catteslone: ft p*dict*
gardinn* iac* int* gardinn' Bic'i Dalton, ex pte Tna, ft gardinn* Thome Ferrers,
Armig*, ex p*te alt*a, ft abbntt' se vsq' yenellam p'dict' : ad opus Johls Stanley,
armig'i, ft XUzabeth vx'is eins, ft hered* hit' eos legitthne p'creat* **i
In 1460, ''Pristlone in le Chirchestiete," is recorded.*
Cat-lane was abolished in the reign of Charles 11.,
and the land disposed of, by the corporation, to different
persons.'
CARREF0XJR....The meeting of the four wiiys. Church-
street, Aldergate, lichfield-street, and Silver-street, was
very anciently called the Carrefour.
June so, 1S9S :— " Philipp* Drak ht seisfai* hi q'dam ptiela tie en* edUc* ..
ex dimiasiane Simonis, fil* Sfanonls le Sannage . Jaoent ap*d le Qnaifbuk de
Tsmeworth, fait* t*n' p*d*Gi Shnonis, ex vna p*te, ft Beg* sttam, ex alt'a,.. . . "<
Lichfield STBE£T....This street continues on the same
line with Church-street, to the road leading by the
village of Hopwas to Lichfield. It was formerly di-
vided by the bars or barriers,' — ^the outer fortifications
of the town, — ^into two parts. The first was generally
called lichfield-street, and the second Outwall-street.
But in time, probably on the disuse and destruction of
1 Court rolls. 85 B. III.} S B. n.{ 9, SS, 84, H. VI. 9 lb., 88 H. VI.
3 Coiporationreooids, 1068. 4 Conitro]]s,98E.I. 6 Court ndls, 1836 to 1470.
CASTLS AND TOWN. 18S
the barriers, the former name became applied to the
whole. At the open space, near the top, once stood
the Town-hall; but it was removed at the commence--
ment of last century.
April, iig»:— •<AlMi» d'on 4b WfgliitaD petf noTe h'edHar qaodd' tea* in
OtewaUMtrete, de ten' quod* Bobtl SdieUte nup* defoncti." Jan^ 1900:—'
•« Joh*M de CoUeehoU A Alic' rz* dna reddiderant in man' baUi'or*.. .Tna'
aaeeiMg* .... In LicheiUdeetrate, Im' faizta tenm* lUdl SelTettr', A eztend* ee tA
]0'gltadin« a ▼!» Regia veq* la WaUefortonri q'd qald* maevag* WUl' Melllhev
qnond' tenoit : ad opoa Nleh*i de Kynchale, p'eone eodle de Drayton-Bafleet,
Winn da NentoB, A Robti d« Mapde, o^mH', her» A anicn' eiioi' .... *•
Jnl7 9, 1S70:— '* Sdaat .. q'd ego, Joh'ee Mattbewa de Tunworfh dedl .. Ad't
da WytliordleTa A Joh'i de ajfton, capeUla, .. Ton' meraaf* .... in Comit'
Staflbfd', p'at iaoet in Otewalestrete, .... A extend* ee in long' a via Regia Tiq'
ad campii' del Walfoxlong Kt eaUafecerunt ball'ls p* eeissi'a h'end' : A edam
cQBcceair eat eiad'm Ad*e A Johl libtatem TOles A fwenut lideUt* in
p^eeoc' Bog'i Betke, WSPi Keec, tone ball' i'bm, .. d*ni Henr* Caytewayte,
Rector* ecel*ie de Karlebm, .. A moltor' al', Ac.*'— "Sdant .. q*d noe, Joh*ea
da Bopewaa A Cbristlana rz' mea, dedimne Oliaero Clede de Tunworth, capdl'o.
.. Ton' mcaoag*, .. in Com' Stodlbrd', p'nt iaoet in Otewalestrete, »•
Megr, 1S8S:— •« Sdaat .. q*d noa, Jotafee BoHenhnll da Tonatyi A Joh'na rx* mm,
dodim' RiCo de OMynton, fil*o Johls da Oldyngton .. duo mesoag* .... qna
.. qnond' too* d'ni BaldewTuy FTeayle, mllltie, senioria, p'nt aimul Jacent in
Otewaleetrete, inf meanag* Rogt da Pype A Amide, TX'is due .... A mee'
Job'ia Cokeo. .... A eztendnnt .. a via regia Ttq' man'm d'ni lliame de
Oldyngton, Cenonid ecd'ie OoMlaf de Tafworth. .... " May Si, 1470:— AUda,
Bop^ rx* ThtatM BnuHey, Tcnit coram balli'a, in pnra vidnetate ena, A annn' red-
didit in manna d'oor* balli'or' dno ootegia simnl jacanf .. in tIco Tocaf lidiefeld-
itreta, aliaa d'co ez antiqno Otwalalrete, Int' fMa q^Mlam Robti DnnstaU, ex pte
Tna, A rram medo Johfa Stanley, mlUt', ax pte albm} A extendit ee in longitndine
ab alta via p'dta veq' ad la Walfnriong : ad opna Rie'i Kdyng de Wlgynton A
Hizabcth, vxoria ine, .... "t
lichfield-street is the finest one in the town, both in
regard to its length and breadth. Lyiog very nearly
parallel to, and at a little distance from, the Tame, the
houses on the south side are provided with large and
pleasant gardens abutting on the water. The agreeable-
ness of the situation is thereby very greatly enhanched.
Tet the street contains only two objects of interest, — the
School founded and endowed by the late sir Bobert Peel,
1 OoortlDils,18E.I.}4S,4S,B.ni.|5R.II.}10B.rV.
184 TAMWORTH
and the Moat-house. Within the last few years very
great improyements have been made at the lower end,
by the rebuilding of a number of houses, and the erec-
tion of many more.
Bbadfobd STRssT....The lower part of lichfield-street,
by the plot of ground where the horsefEur ia now usually
held, was formerly called Bradford-street It derived its
name from the Broad ford leading to the island or
Broad-meadows, over the part of the river known as the
Wean-lake.^
May, lagot— "Simon to Wjrto dat .... Joh' fil' too .... tola' tcnra' toam in
Bradford, ca» Mpto* acrii terra, ft t'dun pfe' de Stoekwaltomeddo, ft rdaa ^W
vni' aore p*U in Btdkimar, ft t'dam p*te* Tni' aera pti in CUdefardniflddo : ft q'
d'cos SImo' no' h't dgiUii' p'pom, ideo liffilla' Bic* Don e' aeonod*." Ftob. n,
1S17:— "WlU't Boch'e, Muior raddlt in man' baU'or' medietatem vni'
tnirfacQ fra, com Crofto adiaoante, in Bradefordeitrate, .... ad op' WIUI to
Waoera de Tunwoith ft Itabdl' vx'to ei' .. **<
In accordance with the very general custom of early
times, a family assumed a cognomen from the Broad ford.'
Robot do Bradford.
I
John de Bradford, -Matilda,
ISM. ^1 1304.
I
Wniiam de Bradford,— Joan,
1S86, 1310. 1310.
Wyborne LANE....This lane runs from Lichfield-street,
nearly at the top, to the river Tame.
Jan. 80, 1317:— "Thom'atteCroea, eepeU'i, .... reddit in man' ball'or* vna*
placeam t*re, ca* edific* lap'poeit* lux* Wybumelone, vna' plaoeam Vn cnitilaci)
ad aquam de Tune iuz' Wybanelone : . . . . ad op' Marfarete, 111* Agn' Tx*te Joh'to
toSaoace "4
Peel STREET....This street is very modem; and takes
the same direction as Wybome-lane, feirther down lich-
field-street. In it is situated the Baptists' Meeting-
house.
Moor Lane and Ludoate Lane These are merely
1 Ferambototlon, i807. 3 OoortroUa, le B. i.; ii B. n.
a lb., 14,33 E. 1. 1 SB. II. 4 lb., 11 B. II.
CASTLK AND TOWN. 185
lanes leading principally amongst fields and gardens.
Moor-lane^ named in 1470/ runs out of Lichfield-street,
passes along the edge of the Staffordshire-moor, and joins
Ludgate-lane, which continues towards the northern
extremity of Gungate, and partly forms the boundary of
the old borough.*
Silver Street and Lady Bridge BANK....These were
known, in former times, as Ladybridge-street' and the
HoUoway.* They pass from the end of Aldergate to
Lady-bridge; and lie, on the west side, in the county
of Stafford, and on the east side, in that of Warwick.
July St, 1371 :— " Sdant &c. q*d noa, Wm*i de Mdewych de Tamworth & AliC
Tz* mea, dedim' .. Rlc'o Wysae de Lychefeld .. Tnu* messaag*, .. in Com' Staff*
in Tico Tocat* Ladybroggeatrete, p*at jacet int' ten* Baldewyni Fftuill, milit*, ex
p*te Tna, ft ten' Ph*i de Bydeford, & Margaret* vx'is eina ex alt*a; & extend' ae
ab alto Tico raq' foaaat' rocat* le Kengeadych .... " May S5, 14S9:— "WiU'a
Dalton de Tamworth .... redd' in man' ball' run' Cotag' .... iac' in Tico toc'
ladibrogeatret, int' ten* qnond' Johaune Breton & ten' Bicl Dalton ft Agnet'
Tx*ia eioaj .... & extend' ae a via regia vaq' ad reneU* toc' Wybnm lane: ad
opfoa Thome Seman .... " Oct. 18, 1547:— "Me'yt Wyll'm maaon ftTomaa dege
ahall make ther yate of there croft on lade brege hyll, & ahall not dryne thorowe
y» comyn lane, Tpon payne of x^ii. totiea q'otiea. "<
Ladybridge-bank was once bounded, on one side, by
fields, where the Workhouse now stands, and on the
other by the Castle-ditch. It consisted of a narrow
road, at the foot of a slight hill; along the brow of
which an irregular pathway was cut, with some old
wooden rails. It remained in a very delapidated state,
until within the present century; when, through the
liberality of the late sir Robert Peel, great improvements
were made, and a respectable and fitting entrance into
the town formed. The road was widened by cutting
I Coort roUa. S Perambnlatlon, 1097. 9 Court roUa, 38 E. III.
4 Ib.,8fiH.VI.
5 lb., 44 E. III., 17 H. VI., H. VITI. The earlieat Engliah bye-law, which ia fonnd
hi the Conrt-rolla, ia dated on the 32nd May, 1433. It ia to the effect that William
BaiMhead should pat hia galea in orda, under liability of fine. '* Ordinatu' e* q'
Wai*a Romeahed pnt hya geta 1* od' gofmmanna the* they bane bene befor tyme i,
peyne of xtj<)., half to y« comn box, ft d* ball*ia. **
6 B
186 TAMWOKTH
away part of the hill; and^ as it waa impossible to
avoid an elevated foot-path, it was paved, flagged, and
defended by neat and strong iron palisades, the nde
of the hill being bricked. We read of the bariers both
in Ladybridge-street' and Ghingate.'
Bell Lane... .There remains only one more place to
be alluded to, before turning to speak of those parts of
the town, situated entirely in Warwickshire. This was
called "Yenella sub tintinabulo " ; and twice only have
we seen it named.
Ha. 10. 1101:— "Joh'i dt PIcklbrd ht MrriBm in qM* ptB ml' Barsif'
en' ptln' Jaoente in yeneUa ■'b ttntinnahln, ex dono ft eoBeeadone Mag*ri Bobi de
Pldiford, in plena Car*. " Sept 4, 131S :— " Joh*M Pjrdieford, Boifenais dc Tbaa-
worUi.....icddit in mann* ]tam*iar* q'nd' p*tem yni* Bargf«|) Vn .. p*nt iacct in
lliamiroith in q'd' renell' nib Tlntlnabalo : ad opuB D*ni Blc<l dn Tecoebnr', Guoaiel
•cclle Collegiate de Tamwortli, ....*•*
Where "the lane under the bell" can have been,
we are unable to conjecture.
Market Street and PLACE....These formerly con-
sisted of a row of houses and shops on the north alone.
The opposite side was occupied by the Castle and its
surrounding ditch ; and was called the Castle-green.
The houses erected on the south side, since the time of
Henry YIII., are mostly built at the back on piles,
within the ditch, which had been filled up previously
with soil and rubbish. The consequence has been that,
owing to the want ot a completely firm foundation, some
of the older buildings have given way in a slight
Market-street and place run parallel with Church-
street; and communicate with it by King-street, and, at
the top, by Lunn's entry. In the space around the
Town-hall, at the east end, is held the market every
1 Court roUa, S H. V1.»—14S4. S lb., 13 R. II.»— ISfiO.
s Covrt roUs» BtalKBidahire, si E. I., 6 B. ki.
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 187
Saturday; as undoubtedly it had been, on the same
spot, from the earliest times. In 1285, it is said that
PhUip de Marmyon made a certain perpresture or en*
eroachment to the detriment of the king's market, by
either part of the Castle, of eight feet in breadth, and
forty feet in length.' In 156S,' and again in 1656,'
the Market-cross is mentioned; so that it would seem
there was an appropriate building on the site of the
present Town-hall under which the people assembled.
The part east and south of this edifice was formerly
used as the ''Barley-market.^' In 1711, there was a grant
from the corporation of Tamworth to Mr. Mainwearing
of Drayton-Basset, steward to lord viscount Weymouth,
of two dwelling houses, with '' culloms " supporting the
over-hanging part, opposite this place. Buildings of
this peculiar, and once common, construction are scarcely
now found in the town.
George STREET....This was anciently known as Bull-
stake, or Bullstock-street. But it lost that designation
on the disuse and removal of the Bull-ring, and re-
ceived the name of George-street, perhaps from the
George Inn. Under this alias it is designated in 1704/
On the south side, it was once principally occupied
by crofts and gardens ; but it is now a regular and
good street. It runs from the Market-place to the end
of Colehill, nearly parallel with the river Anker and
with Church-street, being connected with the latter by
College-lane; where the National schools are situated.
AGATEWATEK-LEAD£R....Water-leader in Agas or Agate-
lane, or, as it was often called, Agatewater-leader,' lay
by the Anker, between the Castle and Bolebridge. On
the 8th of May, 1314, a bye-law was made that no
1 Pladta corone, conun J. de Vane, rot. 40., 13 £. I :— Thomas'i DafdAle.
S Cluaiberlftiii'B acooantB. S Puish Register. 4 TItle.deedt of that date.
s Court rolls, 8ft E. I.
188 TAMWOBTU
person henceforward should wash the intestines of oxen
or other animals at this place^ under pain of losing the
whole property there washed^ besides being fined.^
8BOOBisoATE....This also lay by the same water, and
perhaps may have been identical with the last place;
but neither now exist.' In 1285, the abbot of Merevale,
who possessed land at Tamworth, made a perpresture
by obstructing the thoroughfiBure at a certain lane, where
the burgesses of the town were accustomed to draw
water.' It was undoubtedly at this place; for, on the
11th of November, twelve years later, we find that the
abbot of the same religious house and Cralfrid Wyne
were both amerced at the court-leet, for obstructing,
with their gardens, a lane leading towards the water at
Segorisgate.*
Jaljr 10. 1104:— •'Gttlfr'i WyM .... d«k Grcfor', fil* nio. Tan* met* .... in
Thancwoith, lux* Tcndftm* que dadt u* •q'm qw roWt* Oncor, .... '*<
CoLEHiLL....This was called, in the olden times,
Cross-street, fin>m the Stone-cross at its upper end.
Dec 8ft, IS81:— '•D'tuBiOdewTii' Fraojrle, mJln, tndldit .... Ric»o Mrdetton
de Tunwovth, .... vnu' mesMc*! •••*>& com* Warr*, ■lc*t iacct in tIoo Tocf le
GTOMcstrete, Int* niMvag' il*ni lUiin Buaet dc Dnyton, wSUtU, .... ft maiH«*
p'd'd Baldewynyi .... & CKtendit m In loncKadi'e n tIa icgin viq' to kynsgcB-
djrche •••
Colehill is rather short; but it would have formed one
of the best streets in the town, were it not for the ir-
remediable inconvenience of its steepness in passing to
Gungate. The Unitarian Meeting-house stands on the
east side of it.
Bull RiNG....At the junction of Bolebridge-street,
with Colehill and George-street, was placed the Bull-
ring, with the Bull-stake, and Bullstakewell.'
1 Court rolls, 6 E. II. a lb., 8ft E. I.,— 1297.
3 Placita corone, IS B. I. :— ThoniM's Dagdale.
4 Court rolls, ss E. I. ft lb., 89 B. I. 6 ludenture, 5 R. II.
7 Court rolls, 84 U.VII.,— IMS.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 189
May 0, 1314:— Joh'fls dt Tarkedych & Mazsareta rx' d' h'a*t iCTiiiiam de
▼no ten* ez opp*o le Bolcstake i Sept. 90, 14S4:— "Hec indentara facta
int* TlMina' de Paren, Anaig* Bog'ain de Aston, & Hngone' Wylugbby, Annlic'om,
ex p*te Tna, & Rtceidn' Bazbnr de Tunworth, & AUanoie', rx*em cios, ez alt'ra
p^, testat q'd p*dict' Thomas, Itog*Q8, & Hugo, tradidenmt .... p'ftOo Ric*o &
JUianore duo traigacia inalmul iacentj la le Bolrjmf & m extend' de Bolstake-
street vaq' kjngeMlycbe, *'<
There are some curious particulars relating to this
part of the town, and others in Warwickshire, in
" The accountes of henry Baron and Will'm patchet,
beyng Chamberlaynes of Tameworth within the County
of warwyck, maid the second day of November, An'o
d'ni 1668. "
"Redyttes.
It'm, Beceyued for the Bent of the comon grownd,
iiij** xiiij* yj*
It'm, Beceued for sheip pens, xxxviij" iiij*
It'm, Beceyued of Thomas starkey, for lus firandus
mony, iij* iiij**
It'm, Beceyued of John borrowes, for the reste of his
firanchis money, xx^
It'm, Beceyued of John Trayford, for the rest of his
firanclus money, x*^
It'm, for the dong hyll at Catcheharm, ij"
Some vij** viij**
Paymentes & Allowances.
It'm, Allowance for catcheharm buttes to Bobert
Jeamo'd, iij*
It'm, to be Allowed for henry Bichard's pentys, xij*
It'm, to be Allowed for Mr. John Ferres, for catche-
harm, yj*
It'm, to be Allowed for Mr. John Ferres, for ij
percels of ground, laite in the holdyng of will™
eds, xyj*
It'm, to be Allowed for John Swyfte, ij*
1 OoQZt roHi, 7 >• U* 2 Indenture, 3 H. VI.
190 TAMWORTH
[t'm, paid to thomas fieman xxvij lode of sand, vij*
[t'm^ paid to Will'm BobjBson & to colman for xx
loodes of stones, carrege, xj' viij^
[t'm, paid to the hird man, for lus waigs, xiij' iiij^
It*m, for makyng of ij comon ladders, ij* viij*
[t'm, to the sargeants, for cheise, ij* iiij^
[t'm, to the bayly of the hundred, ij*
[t*m, paid to Mr. Ferres* bayly, vij* yj*"
[t'm, paid to christofer hollyer, for Tymber, makyng
of ton well Crowles, with covers for the same,
and for the Cowkstowle, xiiij* viij^
It'm, for workmanship of Raife baron's shop, xyj*
It'm, for the Reperradons of the markyt crosse, j* iiij*
It'm, for mendyng of bowlstok well, viij*
It'm, for makyng the bull ryng, xyj*
[t'm, to John Seide, for worke, yij*
[t'm, to Richard myln', for worke, xv*
rt'm, for pyles, iiij*
[t'm, for carrying of the same, yj^
[t'm, for xviij sheip pens, vij* yj^
[t'm, paid for Tymber, viij*
[t'm, for sawyng of the same, yj* yj*
[t'm, for mendyng the pinfolde & pyllerye, ij* iiij^
Some v" viij' xj*
And so Remayneth xxxj* ix*
in the boxe xxxj* ix* "'
The Bull-ring and Bull-stake, which were usually
found in every town, were removed at the time when
the cruel practice to which they were subservient was
abolished. This change took place here in the course
of the seventeenth century. It was once considered
unlawful to slaughter a bull for the purposes of food,
without it had been being previously subject to this
I Corpontion Recorda.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 191
unmerciful treatment Occasionally in the court-rolls of
the town, at an early date, we find persons fined for
haying killed these animals before they had been baited
by dogs.
July 15, 1907:— "Nich*s de Pieh' In m*iA. q* ooddlt q'ndun tanni* no' ftiimt*
csnfb': ptoc* Joh> de Shep* & Ric* I>on.**i
The pillory is first mentioned in 1294; when one
Nicholas Alcus, by being sentenced to it, on his con-
viction, for selling light loaves, the third time, was
condemned to the memory of posterity.^ So late as
1727, "it stood in firont of the Town-hall.
Qnarter-MKkms court, Jan. 11, 1797:— "A bill of Indictment l>ein|r found
bf 7* gnmd Jury •e' ^ohn Oloater, for a petty Larceny com'itted by him, & the
Priaonr batrlnff pleaded ffoitty to yt eaid Indictmt, It is ordered by this Court that
the eald John Olocter be pnblickly whiped at y« Pillory, in y" market place, on
firiday y* Twellth day of this Instant January, between y« hours of elearen ft
twdve of y* dock, in y* forenoon* '**
Of the cucking-stool, we have nothing to record. To
the honour of the good dames of Tamworth in the
olden times, we must say that we have not found any
instance of this instrument of punishment having been
called into use.
BouBBRiDGB STREET....Bolebridge-8treet leads from the
bottom of George-street and Colehill to Bolebridge,
over the river Anker.
Oct, 1SS4 :— *' m' il|i*. Inq*slco capta ex officio p' sac>mentu' duoded' Jur* : q'
dlcn*t q'd Tbom* Dontesone ft Rob^ Maled de Bollemilne ft Thorn' tr* ei' Tencru*t
de Tavena de domo Johls de Ooton, nocfat' die sabbtl p*x an' f 'm s'd Leonard!,
ad oppotto' dom' Oalfr*! le Irenmon^'e, et ibi renit Itob*t'8 le Osrt'e de Midelton
et cUs Insultn' fedt u'bis Utigiosis : ra* ip'm p'secuti ftieru*t Tiq' in domu' d'd
Oalfr*!, quo renit Oalft's pd'c*s ad ftmnand' pace' int' p'tes} tu' p'd'co Galfir'o
Insulta' ftccr't et in domu' sua' TerbaraTer't et T'ln'aner't inlnste . Id*o om'es
p*d*el Bob', niom', et Thorn' et Bobt's in m'ia."^
Of an old family, that took their name fix)m this
part of the town, little occurs, except that one of them,
doubtlessly firom the rustic minstrelsy wherewith he
1 Court rolU, 25 B. I. s lb., 2S E. I. 3 CorporaUon Records,
4 Court rolls, 18 E. II.
192 TAMWORTH
delighted his neighbours, and cheered them at the close
of their daily labour, was generally termed " le Piper."*
Robert de Boltebrlttwtnte,
ISll, ISIS. I
NldiolH.sr ^ ■ "
JoftB, a wU Clii1illaiia.s Richard to Plpcre
dow in ISIS. ( d« Boltebritteatrcte,
18l« to ISM.
Bolebridge-street, in the middle of which, on the
east side, stands the Methodists' Meeting-house, is the
oldest part of the town now remaining, and the one
which has, perhaps, undergone the least improvement.
To render it a thoroughly good street, would require
very extensiye alterations, on account of its narrowness
in the middle. Still its character, within the last few
years, has been greatly changed for the better.
CocKET^s LANB....Cocket's-lane' and Cocket's-lane-end
we cannot identify with certainty.
May, 14M :— "No*imt vniu'ii .. me Joh*!!! Aatoo, 111* & Hered' Rob*ti Aatan
d« Tuniroith, remlsiaM .... Ttuma TkUlo' da cad*m ft Agn' tx* eloa, .. tote*
ina & damen' qae h'eo .... in mo omo ca' gaidi'o adiacent*, . . . p*Qt iaeet In
Tunwortli, In Com' Warr*, lux* Coicetealone, Int* VT q*Bd» Baldewyny FMryll &
t*r* d'd Thame, ex vna p'te, ft Tf Thome Fox ft tV q*nd* Rob*i da Artoo, ft tV
Ttiome Symond, ft t*r' pHicnd' de Syreeeoto, ex alt'a p*te ; ft extendit le in Ion-
fitadine a Tenella too' Coketeeloae vmi' Vf Henr* Jeke. .... ** Coiiit.leet, Got,
1M8:— '*Ud. Joh'ce Rene h*ct vna* Stoke lae* in Regla via. apd Ooketyalone-
Jnde."»
Dead Lanes, Perrtcroft Lane, and Schoolhoxjsb
Lane.... From the bottom of Bolebridge-street, some small
lanes run northward, to a little distance beyond the
top of Aldergate-street; and then a path turns off west-
wards into Gungate. The part continuing on the same
line is formed by the two Dead-lanes,* and by Perrycroft
lane.' The mark of division between these two, is
where they are joined by a short road, called School-
1 Court rolle, S, 7» 9. U B. 11. S lb., 8 B. IT, 1S14. S Tb., ; H. V., 24 H. VII.
4 PerambnlaUon, 1697. < CoortroUs, 7 H. V.,>14S0.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 193
honse-lane/ leading from Gungate^ nearly opposite the
Free Grammar School, and at the comer of the Ahns-
houses. Perrycrofi-lane is so called from the numerous
orchards and gardens situated in its neighbourhood.
The Perrycrofts have held that name from time out of
record. A very small portion of them lies within the
precincts of the old borough.
Gonit-keC May, 1S09:~ "It* p* q*d Jdfa*et de aynton, miles, indad' porta'
Toe* perecroftefate, que defaent e'e ap'ta om'ib* tsnent', i*o In mia : ct p' est q*d
aptat sob pena y)* TiUd*>t
There was an ancient family sumamed "de Piricroft. "
Victoria RoAD....There only remains for us, before
we conclude this division of our history, to speak of
the new road formed from the end of George-street, to
the station of the Birmingham and Derby Jimction
Railroad. It was made at the expence of the company
to whom that line belongs, for the convenience of
passengers. It is a neat and wide road; and promises,
if well maintained, in a little time, to form a street.
But lately some difference has arisen as to the
parties who should keep it in repair. The directors of
the company, compelled reluctantly to form an ex-
pensive approach to the town, have refused to give
their aid, as it had not been stipulated. The cor-
poration have refused, because it is mostly out of the
limits of their jurisdiction. And the inhabitants of
Bolehall have declined to interfere, because the road
affords no convenience to them. Some arrangement
must soon be effected.
After her gracious Majesty had passed along this
road, on her way to and from Drayton-manor, it was
determined that it should be named Victoria-road, in
1 Fcnunbalatkm, 1897. S Court toUb, 49 E. HI.
C C
196
TAMWOBTH
CkNSOS TAEBN on TBI IOtH of MABCHt 1801.
8TAFFOBD8HIEX.
BomoooB.
dmich-BlivMt
Gongttte
Chnrch-IuM ....
Aldercate-luie ..
PMl>lftF6Ct
BUyer-ttnet, and Ladf.
bridce-baak
WorkbooM
PABisa.
Ftaelcr
Bittcnoole, Buigtey, and
WifglntDn
Colon, AUennUla, ft the
Moor
Coinberfbird
HopwM and Hopwai-liaxi
Total In Stafltaddiiia
WABW1CK8HIBB.
BOBOVOB.
GoDgate
Poor-hoate
AlinshoiiMS . . . .
Silver-street . . . .
Market-itipeet . .
George-street
Gollege-lane ....
ColehUl
Bolebrldce-ctreet
Paaish.
Amington and Stonydelph
BolehaU
Glascote
Cattle-liberty
Wilnecote
DostbiU
Two-gatea
Total in Warwickshire
Total in the town .
Total in the parish .
CASTLB AND TOWN. 197
The Parish-register from the time of the dyil war, has
been accurately kept. But they do not contain the
whole of the baptisms, marriages, and deaths; for, in
1801, out of 1105 families, 7 professed the Boman
Catholic faith; 7, that of the society of Friends; 6,
that of the Baptists; and 24 belonged to different
forms of Protestant dissent. As, however, the Church-
yard was the only place of sepulture, except for the
Quakers, the number of deaths recorded in the register,
must be very nearly equal to the number of births.
To the account of the baptisms, those occurring in the
24 &milies of dissenters have been added; so that the
list only excludes Catholics, Baptists, Quakers, and
those children who died before they were received into
the Church, according to the rites of the established
religion. Hence four or five should probably be added
to the baptisms, to make them equal to the births.
The annual average of baptisms and burials at
Tamworth, within the first half of the eighteenth cen-
tury, taken for seven years indiscriminately, is as follows :
Males 56 Baptisms. 40 Burials.
Females 47 „ 48 „
103 83
Average of the ten years, from 1780 to 1790.
Males 64 • 75 Bap. 43 Bur. 32 • 5 Mar.
Females 67-75 „ 43-33 „
132 -6 86-33
Average of the ten years, firom 1790 to 1800.
Males 77 - 5 Bap. 51 Bur. 36 • 5 Mar.
Females 84 - 5 „ 51-2 „
162 102 • 2
198 TAMWORTH
Hence, it is evident that a very considerable increase
took place in the population of the pariah, particukulj
during the last ten years. This circumstance was prin-
cipally owing to the establishment of extensiTe cotton
manufactories^ in the town and neighbourhood. The
number of baptisms also became more disproportionate
to the burials. This was attributed to the better
mode adopted for presenring the lives of infiemts, when
inoculation b^an generally to prevail.
The number of burials annually, for the last seven
years, was 1 in 52 persons, and the births, 1 in S ' 5 ;
and the baptisms exceeded the burials by 402. There-
fore, the proportion of births to burials was very nearly
as 8 to 5.
In the early part of the eighteenth century, the
burials were annually about 1 in 40 persons; at the
close, 1 in 52.
The number of females baptised, within the last
eleven years, exceeded the males by 96, being in the
proportion of 9 to 8. But, in almost all former periods,
the males were to the females as 12 to 11.
The marriages, for the same time, were annually 1
in every 142 persons.
At the time of the census being taken, the number
Of married persons in the parish was 1678
Of children and persons grown up, but
still living with their parents, with-
out any separate establishment, . 2527
Of widowers and widows, 308
Of single independent persons, .... 870
Of servants, apprentices, shopmen, or
journeymen, living with their
masters^ 454
CASTLE AND TOWN.
199
For the last four years, an account was taken of the
ages of persons buried.
Under
2
yean
111
Between
2
and 5
48
••••
5
.... 10
11
....
10
.... 20
32
.»>.
20
.... SO
26
....
30
.... 40
87
....
40
.... 50
32
....
60
.... 60
25
«...
60
.... 70
31
.••.
70
.... 80
. 45
,,,,
80
.... 90
25
....
90 and upwards .
4
427
This makes it appear that the general longevity of
the inhabitants of the parish is very great, 74 persons
out of 427 haying attained an age of 70 years and
upwards : being an average of in every 5 * 77 persons.
Several persons of this parish have been especially
noticed as having attained the age of more than 100
years. John Meggs died in 1772, aged 101 ; Thomas
Fletcher, in 1690, aged 102; William Fasher, in 1785,
aged 118; and William Farr, in 1769, aged 121. The
latter person was a native of Birmingham, and employ-
ed as the Tamworth-carrier. He had one-hundred and
forty-four children, grand-children, and great^grand-chil-
dren; but he survived them aU, and left 10,000/. for
charitable uses.
Instances of extraordinary longevity have occurred
even recently within the town.
aoo
TAMWORTH
Cbksvs taxeh <m thb 27m or Mat, 1811.
nrAFFOEIMHIRX.
BOBOUOH.
OuDfate
Churdi-lMie ....
Alderial».lMM ..
Lkhfleld-itrMt ..
P«el.fttrMt
BUTcr-ttnet, ate.
Pabiib.
Fludty
BIttenooto, Bucler* DwuteU
Wlcgtaitoii
,ft thelloofj
HopwaSy md HopwM-taftys
Hoa
S3
41
14
IS
IM
SS
16
Total in BtaftKdthin
WARWICKSHIRE.
BOBOCOB.
drarch'.tti'Mt
OnniatB
Gcorgc^itiMt . • . . ,
OoUefe-lanc
ColetaiU
Bo]«lnids»4tTCCt .
§81
Pabibh.
Amlncton and Stonydelpli
Oltfloote ....'
OMtte-Ubertf
WOnecote
DoMhUl
Two-CBtes
Total in Warwickihire . . .
Total In tbe town
Total in the pariah
S18
43
50
1ft
1
106
8
11
546
681
1187
16
I H |1 J Ifa
S4|
41,
14
Sft
lift
86^
»7|
1
873
188
11
37
ft8
•97
173
lft7 108 88
43
ft3
18
1
110
8
11
S63
ft97
339
609
63
47
187
174
899
i i
33
43
16.
96
lift
78
867
7ft
31
1ft
877
143 894
84
119
118
78
46
348
619 18181786 111
37s
6D7
650
1886
18
881
168
187
11
8
11
116
181
178
778
1990
111 -
*: 14
61 177|
7 *
4 IB
84, 887
11 141
Si li
-r-
891 1887
89'
:s
108
ftl
93
13
8
6
4
18
I
ft
8
1838 88
144
1191 11
18 8
1& 8
14 1
198. Ift
138 9
86 4
44i 3
836
189i 8
134, 6
49, 1
1 8
837 6
9 8
so' 8
ft79 14
1407 1884 149
31941 815
18
K
17a
81
I9IS
311
SSfl
1664
19
8741
9991
CASTLE AND TOWN. gOl
Census takxn on the 28th ov Mat, 1821.
STAFFORDSaiKB.
BOBOUOB.
Chnrdi-strcct
Chordi-lBiie . . . ,
AUorfBtfr^treet '
lidifieU-ttnet ..
SilTer-ftreet, &c.
Pabisb.
Bittenoote, BBogtef, DonstBU
WiniBtxa ,
Ootan, Aldcnnflls, ft ths Moor
Comberfofd
HopfWAB-taays .
I Total in Staffonldiire .
WARWICK8HIKB.
BOBOUOB.
QoiiMta
SttTer-straet ,..'.'.'/.[',['.'.'.
Market-Street
Pag-rtreet..
OeorK^vtreet
Coilege-laae
ColefaUl
Bolelvidge.4&reet
Pabisb.
Aaiiagtan and Stonydelpli .
fniaaoote.
Two gates
TMal in Warwidcihiia
Total in the town ....
Total in tiie pariah. ..
189
la
60
60
39
19
43
1
8
411
735
893
871
004
717
1899
19
430
768
73
78
7
40
6
60
17
k8
119
51
83
5
139
377
065
740
FuniUei.
Emplofcd in
837
187
805
91
543
AgH.
105
100
143
390 193
400
53
77
97
107
305
isl
5o;
153 } I
708
409
370
085
747
3871453
Peraone.
837
503
50
143
115
88
49
84
1043
180930373890
917
078
1744
800
1318
3300
137
334
9
310
070
1590 1091
1830
34593718
103fl
113S
70
379
347
339
88
106
3
41
I93&
357
414
19
053
1343
3381
3574
7177
D D
202
TAMWOBTH
▲OBs OF nnaoMi.
STAFFORDSHIRS.
Maks under
10
90
80
40
5o;«o
70
80
?!
100
10
90 80
M"l*
TtW
00
100
BOBOVOB.
Clrarch-strMt
Qwngmito
«7
91
14
81
1S5
11
97
90
8
19
100
18
0
18
10 4
11 19
8
8
1
9
98
5
1 0
0 0
9 8
11 1
9 9
17
80
6
99
•1
90| 91
16
Ifl
7 4
1911
5 9
8 9
8 9
9 1
9 1
99 9
9 9
1
1
1
0
4
0
Chuirh-lane. .........
'o S
4197
0 0! a
Aldergmte^tticet
Lidifield.s»reet,ftc. ..
SttTcr-stTNt, aw. ....
Pabim.
Hopwrnft-hByi
Wifrfnton, Comber-
fonUOotoa,HopwM,
itc
10
44
8
18
87
10
95 IS 9 5
8149 49 90
19:i0 7| 1
904
0
01
1
159
1
68
8
101
0
68
6
06
I
88
9
J:
00
0
98
43
0
94
17
0
81
1
8
0
6
1
9
0
8
0
8
994
0
08
5
108
0
106
180
70
s
03
0
40
8
03 40
0 0
39 97
5
10
0
96
1
5
0
0
1
0
0
9
0
Byowoto
ei
s
5, 8
1|>
S
S
i
8
£
9
«
«
'
8
5
«?
'1'
5
S
M
§
1
8
S|
S
n
M
1
5
;
i
5
»>»
^
Ok
40
41
4
10
5
«7
16
s
01
49
V
4
18
9
89
6
9
68
99
99
1
98
0
80
4
6
84
90
91
3
19
9
14
4
1
SO
18
19
19
0
0
0
1
4
0
10
9
8
15
5
0
0
9
0
1
1
6
9
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
66
59
0
10
4
90
8
4
00
67
89
6
98
4
88
5
10
48
87
94
9
89
9
84
^l
69
94
97
15
19
10
19
0
9
;
:
0
1
0
1
WARWICKSHIRE.
BOBOUOB.
Chwch-itlMt
Qangate
11
19
0
17
SUTcr-HiMt
MBrk«t.ttKet
Klnr-vtn^ T --T
1 0
1S| 5
r 0
9, 4
?:i
85 19
0|3
17,11
1> 1
9 0
4 9
0 0
7 5
0 9
«|1
lOjJ.
Qcof B C'Stncc *..>•.«.
C6Uece-lBnc
CotohlU
Bolebrldce-fticct ....
Pabibb.
BotebBUandaiBMsols
CBstle-Ubertf
Wllneoote, Dottliffl. ft
Two-gmtBt.
17
5
4
67
17
8
6
97
3
n
09
s
109
10
SO
0
67
5
1
68
15
91
1
88
10
10
0
85
9
10
11
0
99
S
19
0
1
95
8
8
8
8
8
9
0
0
8
1
0
8
80
60
1
70
S
90
51
8
04
I
98
80
69
8
19
95
0
49
o
18
14
1
33
s
4
10
0
99
10
8
9
5
9
0
1
11
■o
1
9
0
9
1
1
Total in WBTwickBliln
TOtBlintlMtOWB....
Total In tfaBpBiteh..
S
•A
M
R
2
n
^
1^
•o
-
§
2
•o
R
s
9
'
8
o
""
1
s
?
B
"1
s
9
s
^
s
S
i
M
^
8
8
£
=
ff
S
2
s
s
a;
s
9
M
e
i
&
&
8
g
S
a
S
8
e«
"
g
£
§
i
§
s
^
R
8
_;;
i
g
S
1
§
s
-
8
«
CASTLE AKD TOWN. 208
From 1801 to 1811^ an increase of 664 persons had
taken place in the parish j of which 205 were in the
town. The number of baptisms and burials had accord-
ingly increased; but they bore about the same relative
proportion.
Baptisms. Burials.
166-6 106-6
There was an addition of 34 houses^ of 60 families^
of 152 males^ and of 53 females in the town.
From 1801 to 1821^ in the town, there had been an
addition of 183 houses, of 147 families, of 489 males,
and of 299 females; making an increase in population
of 788 persons. From 1811 to 1821, there had been
an addition of 149 houses, of 97 families, of 337 males,
and of 246 females ; making an increase of 583 persons.
But, in 1821, there were actually 12 families less em-
ployed in agriculture than in 1811; and only 11 more,
than in 1801. Yet, it must not be concluded that
the agricultural interests of Tamworth were declining.
The decrease in the number of families thus engaged, is
explained by the increasing prevalence of the custom
for persons occupying farms and lands to add to their
resources, some manufacture, handicraft, or business of
commercial nature. It is a great defect in the different
returns, calculated to convey an erroneous impression,
that the families should have been recorded under one
or other heads of employment exclusively. Had the
number of those combining both occupations been given,
we are thoroughly convinced that agriculture, as well
as trade, would have been foimd to have increased
proportionally with the population.
From the table of ages, it is seen that 99 males, and
110 females, in the parish, had attained an age of 70
201
TAXWOBTH
The females, theieforey were the longer liyen ;
the proportion being 1 in S3 * 12, whikt with the men,
it was 1 in S4 * 95. This gives an average of 1 peison
in 84 * 29 surviving to 70 years, — a result very dif-
ferent from that of the ages of those buried, recorded by
the rev. F. Blick, as we gave them in 1801.
Cbnbus taken om thb 30ni ov Mat, 1831.
In the population returns for 1831 and 1841, we
shall not enter into the full details, as we have previous
done, respecting the town; but merely give the amount
for the side in each county, and then add a few general
remarks.
STAFFORDSHiaS.
IftlByijd >■
TVa. Afri. zr«l,
J
a
u
Flaele7 i
Bangtef aad BondUU . . J
Hopwss^taAyB
WiggintoD, Coteo, ftc.. ,
110
SISO
SM
600
S470
59
1*7
SSI
s
1
IM
8
861
1711
585 1131
II
4 111
163
359
7S7
St
Totid tn StaSbrdahira
7SM
787 81
WARWICKSmSB.
Tunworth
Amington & StouTde^h
CMUe.Ubert7
WilMcote, wtth DootfaSU
Total in Wanrickabize .
891
58
98
10
138
689 89
718
TMal in the town .
Total in tho pailah.
789 89
769
19980
I47t 60
41540
887
195
9 814 411
47
87
4
41 68
46 97
3 11
36| 140
1947
816
139
311
S3
348
8981978 3917
4S3 1010 189fl
78
lOS
15
156
195 964
910 491
717
1547
775
1718 3905
874
878 770
1666 805
1871 3SS7
631
653 1611
'i'"1
S494
16678688 711
In the census for 1881, there were other matters
Stated, mostly r^arding occupations, which it is not
very important to give.
CASTLB AND TOWN. S05
tNCRBAU IN POVULAnON OF THB TOWN.
To 1831.
HOMM.
PUBilte.
IblM.
PMBdM.
1VM>1.
ITS
88
170
ISO
88
411
859
*
340
887
41
751
546
frook 1811
Fram 18S1
But, firom 1821 to 1831, the males had decreased by
78, leaving the population of the town 37 less in the
latter than in the former year.
From 1821 to 1831, although there was an increase
of 23 families, the number of those exclusively employed
in agriculture had diminished from 98 to 13.
Cbnsub takbn on thb 7th or Junb, 1S41.
STAFFORDSHIRB.
HOQMS.
Panons. H Ag«a.
ofUrth.1
1
i
i\
i
1
i
Under
Abofv 1
aojMis. 1
f
1
1
I
1
1
J
Tnnwmth
834
3
18
08
1
1
54
48
85
59
9
14
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
870
839
3
18
03
1
54
51
35
59
9
808
538
9
80
150
4
a
ia7
103
59
133
88
935
588
8
84
107
a
a
117
113
03
134
18
1797
1190
17
44
'1
4
844
810
138
307
40
413
339
3
0
74
8
0
04
45
S
418
877
a
9
78
0
0
49
54
9
450
•1
14
83
3
3
03
58
33
04
13
533
811
0
15
89
8
8
08
59
34
73
9
1359
701
14
81
835
3
4
339
185
110
300
38
538
359
3
13
88
4
0
15
31
(
7
34
Fir.H«7 ^a
Buglef
Bmiehlll
1>niittB]1
HopWM-haTB
WlniBton
gSS^".. :::::.;:::;;.:
Cmnboford
BopwM
BfOBcoto
l^italinStelfonlihire ....
WARWICKSHIRE.
Tamwoith
AndDgtan and Stonyddiib
CtetleUberty
WOnecote, with DoMfaill,
KcCtlebvook, &c
Totia in Warwiduhin. . . .
800
419
59
no
18
151
35
80
0
8
1
19
a
1
0
0
0
1
887
440
05
lis
13
104
3035
907
148
340
31
301
3171
1085
138
849
88
357
4300
1993
870
495
59
718
957
413
07
107
10
108
981
481
59
108
13
170
1078
494
81
139
15
193
1190
004
09
147
15
187
3118
1418
333
313
43
504
1088
574
54
183
17
154
751
41
a
794
1093
1847
3540
771
835
983
1033
3558
983
Total in Um town
Total in the pariah
781
tt
8
810
1709
aoao
3789
885
894
944
1180
8077
1118
1011
M
4
1081
3788
4018
7740
™
1800
8000
3813
5070
ao70
E E
206
TAMWORTH
The return for the Staffordshire part of the town in-
cluded 32 males, and 40 females in the Tamworth
Union-Workhouse, and 1 male and 11 females in a
private lunatic asylum. That for the Warwickshire
part included 1 male in the town prison.
INCRSA8E IN POPULATION OP TBB TOWN.
To 1841.
H«M«.
-.^
POMlM.
T«ttl.
FhjmlSOl
t47
813
<k
41
S14
888
85
188
489
486
198
149
1888
798
Sift
sss
Ynm IMI
FhnnlflSl
From 1 Wi. ......... t r
From these five returns, and our remarks, it is
evident that Tamworth has been gradually progressing
in size and population, since the commencement of the
18th century, and that the town is becoming, in an
increasing proportion, a place of trade.
TRADE, MARKET, AND FAIRS.
Our researches have thrown very little light upon the
condition of Tamworth^ as respects its trade and manu-
fieu^tures, in olden times. It is probable that the
inhabitants have ever been more deeply engaged in
agricultural pursuits^ than in mechanical occupations.
They have never cultivated any one branch of manufac-
ture so extensively^ as to render it their staple article
of trade.
Tanneries have been established in the town^ from
time immemorial; and have only ceased to exist within
the last four years. During a considerable period^
narrow cloths of excellent quality^ were manufactured
in large quantity. These works were abandoned^ and
the mills eventually pulled down^ about a century ago.
We have already mentioned the important benefits
conferred upon the town by the introduction of the
cotton spuming and calico printing into the neighbour-
hood. For thirty years^ these manufactures, under the
able superintendance of the late sir Robert Feel,
flourished with the greatest success. They afforded
constant employment to numerous families ; and sensibly
increased the population of the town. The factories
were situated principally at Fazeley, and BonehilL
Here their enterprising owner, acquired a great portion
of his property, and laid the foundation for the splendid
208 TAMWORTH
fortunes of his family. The fiEtctories, at Fazeley are
still in operation; but the others have long been aban-
doned.
Fifteen or twenty years ago, there were several
manufactories of net^ lace, and Brussels' carpets. StQl
more recently, there was an extensive establishment for
the making of patten-ties. These succeeded for a time,
but sank, at length, under the depressed condition of
the markets, and the effects of too successful competition.
Many of the poorer inhabitants also earned a scanty
addition to their means of subsistence, by plaiting
straw, for the straw-bonnet trade.
At the present time, the principal manufactories in
the town and neighbourhood, are the tape-mills of Mr.
Harding, in Bolehall, and Mr. Etienne B. Hamel, in
Bolebridge-street. The Castle-mills have been enlarged,
and are now used for the manufacture of paper; and
there are extensive works of the same kind, and also
for printing paper by patent machinery, for hanging
rooms, at Alder mills. The £Bibrication of hats, cord,
and string, and the process of dyeing, and tallow-chand-
ling, are also carried on to some extent
The shopkeepers of Tamworth are comparatively
wealthy men. Although their shops do not vie with
the showy '' establishments" of larger towns, they usually
acquire an honourable independence, and not unfi:^
quently amass considerable fortunes.
The greater part of the inhabitants, depend fox
subsistence, however, directly or indirectly, upon the
cidtivation of the soil. The town is surrounded, on all
sides, by fertile, well cultivated land. This is laid out
in farms, orchards, and gardens. The meadows yield
abundant crops of hay, sometimes affording, in one
CASTLE AND TOWN. £09
year, two suooesdve harvests. The arahle land presents
luxuriant fields of wheats barley, oats, turnips, and
other Taluable produce. The orchards and gardens, in
the immediate vicinity of the town, are very extensive ;
and not only supply the wants of its inhabitants, but
also furnish a prodigious quantity of fruit and vegeta-
bles for more distant markets. More than fifty carts
are employed in conveying the produce of this district
to Binningham alone.
The character of Tamworth, as an agricultural lo-
cality, has been determined by various circumstances.
A fertile soil,— copious streams of water, — facilities for
effectual drainage, secured by the gentle inclination of
the surrounding hiUs, — excellent roads, offering an easy
communication with various markets, — ^form no ordinary
combination of advantages. To these, may be added, —
plentiful supplies of coal, firom the coal-fields of Kettle-
brook and Folesworth, — stone, fix)m Dosthill and Aming-
ton ; — excellent bricks and tiles, made fix)m the immense
beds of clay, which constitute the hiUs north of the
town, — and abimdance of timber.
The fiomers of this district, are enlightened and
practical men. Justiy regarding the proper cultivation
of the soil, as the securest basis for their prosperity,
they have neglected no means of taking proper advan-
tage of the nattural facilities thus provided for them.
The dreary tracts of heath and forest and the wide
expanse of marshy meadows have disappeared, and
given place to gardens, orchards, groves, and fields of
waving com.
With the view of communicating their experience,
and introducing new and successful modes of agricul-
ture, they have formed the "Tamworth Farmers' Club,*' —
210 TAMWORTH
well adapted to diAise practical infomiation in the
important 8cienoe which form its object The right
honourable or Bobert Peel, — the active promoter of
every public scheme calculated to benefit the town, —
is the patron of the society.
The formation of the Birmingham and Derby Junction
Railway, and the projected lines, — the ''Chumet-yalley"
and ''Trent-Valley," — intended to communicate with
that railway in the vicinity of the town, cannot fiul
to give a firesh impulse, and a new direction, to its
industry. Possessed of a rapid and cheap mode of
transit to and £rom all parts of the kingdom, it is easy
to foresee that the increasing population of Tamworth
will undoubtedly, ere long, obtain profitable employment
in trades and manufiictures hitherto neglected, or but
feebly carried on.
Tamworth possesses the advantage of an excellent
Ma&kst for com, hay, meat, eggs, butter, earthenware,
and other articles of general utility. It is held every
Saturday, and appears to have been kept on that day,
from a very early period. Leland names Tamworth as
''havinge a celebrate Market/'^ In 1560, queen Eliza-
beth rendered it a chartered right; and the grant was
confirmed by the letters patent of king Charles U., in 166S.
A careful comparison of the incidental notices con-
tained in ancient records still in existence, has led us
to adopt the opinion that, before the incorporation of
the town by Elizabeth under one jurisdiction, Tamworth
possessed two separate Markets. One was probably held,
by the ancient Stone-Cross, at the junction of Butcher-
street, Gumpegate, and Cross-street; and the other in
the present Market-place.
1 Itiiu, Tdl. IV, 1B9 b.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 211
About the reign of Edward III., the Faibs held
within the town were very numerous : indeed, they
seem to have occurred nearly every month.^ Most of
these were doubtless held by prescription. A great
Fair, commencing on the feast of saint Swythen, for-
merly belonged to the dean and prebendaries of the
Church, who received the tolls and profits. It was
instituted at a very early time, on the annual com-
memoration of the dedication of that edifice, and named
originally in honour of the sainted Editha, whose feast
was celebrated on the same day as that of the canonised
bishop of Winchester. It should, therefore, be called
Saint Editha's, instead of Saint Swythen's, Fair.
At the period when all the ecclesiastical property
throughout England, was seized by the crown, this Fair
came into the hands of Elizabeth. By her second
charter, she granted it to the corporation; although she
had previously sold the Church and prebends, with aU
rights, to laymen. These having fallen into the posses-
sion of Thomas Repington, Nicholas Breton, George
Corbin, William Necton, and Alexander Morley, a dis-
pute arose between them and the bailiffs ; and the latter
obtained an injunction, in the high court of Chancery,
dated upon the 18th of June, 1589, by which they were
empowered to receive the profits of the Fair, imtil it
should be otherwise ordered. The grounds on which this
decision was made, were, that the fidr was expressly
given to the bailiffii, whereas it was not named in the sale
of the Church-property. It was afterwards, however,
restored to those who held the deanery and prebends.
It was formerly femous for the fnnta and v^;etable
produce brought to it for sale, which obtained for it
the general appellation of "Cherry Fair."
1 Court rolls, temp. E. III.
212 TAMWORTH
Edward IIL bestowed two FaiiB upon the inhabLtants
of the Town, on the feasts of St. Greorge and St
Edward/ The three Fairs only are mentioned in the
charters of Elizabeth. The remainder must have fidkn
into disuse previous to the reign of Henry VIII. ;
for Leland omits all mention of them^ but says^ —
"There be 8 Fayres yearely in the Towne; whereof
the Towne hath 2, and the CoUedge, one.'^
In consequence of the change of style, in 1752, St.
Greorge's Fair is now held on the 4th of May, instead
of the 23rd of April; St Swythen's, on the 26th,
instead of the 15th of July ; and St. Edward's, on the
24th, instead of the ISth, of October. They are now
never continued during the four ensuing days.
In 1792, two other annual Fairs were added, with
the consent of the bailifb, — one on the Monday before
the 2dth day of January; the other on the first
Monday in September.
A more recent alteration has increased the number
of the Fairs to eight, as shown in the following table: —
1 Monday before the 25th of January.
2 First Monday in March.
S First Monday in April.
4 May 4th. St George's Fair.
5 July 26th. St Editha's Fair.
6 First Monday in September.
7 October 24th. St. Edward's Fair.
8 Third Monday in December.
1 SeepifC90' 1 Itin., Tol. IV, ioL 90 a.
THE CHURCH.
HISTORY.
The year 597 has been rendered one of the most
memorable in the annals of our country. That time
was signalized by the arrival of Augustin from Rome^
to announce and propagate the Christian faith. Regard-
less of dangers and difficulties^ he hastened hither to
raise a mighty voice to Heaven^ in places where pro-
found silence had previously reigned^ and to dispel the
midnight-gloom of idolatry by echoing the good tidings,
and reflecting the celestial light, which watching shep-
herds once had heard and seen. The success attendant
upon the apostolical exertions of this great missionary
and his fellow-labourers, was truly wonderful. Within
the space of eighty-five years, Christianity had spread,
not amongst a few inhabitants on the spot where Au-
gustin had first landed, not in one royal court alone,
but throughout all the kingdoms of the Saxon heptarchy.
By the conversion of Peada, in 656, Mercia received the
fiaith; and, six years afterward, it was permanently
secured by Wulphere's adopting the great banner of
the Cross. This event was speedily followed by the
destruction of the places of pagan worship; and soon
the religious aspect of the land was entirely changed.
The existence of a Church. at Tamworth, within the
course of a century after the introduction of Christianity
into the centre of England, cannot well be called in
F p
214 TAMWOBTH
question. At the period when Offa and other Mercian
kings, with their councillors, amongst whom were
bishops and other ecclesiastical persons, resorted to this
place, particularly at great festivals, it was undoubtedly
adorned with all the splendour which was adopted in
those times. It is even not improbable that Edgar
and Wigberht, witnesses to one of Coenwulf s charters,
in 814, and Aetheluulf, who signed one of Berhtwulf s,
in 845, were priests here; for their names are only
attached to documents bearing date at this town.
The first edifice, however, must have suffered total
destruction, when the Danes over-ran the country, and
razed Tamworth to the ground. In the Church which
succeeded, Athelstan witnessed the reception of the Danish
king, Sihtric, into the Christian fold : and there he bes-
towed upon him the hand of her, in honour of whom,
it is supposed, the building was subsequently consecrated.
Under what saintly patronage the previous Church had
been placed, is unknown. It is not unlikely that this
second edifice suffered when Anlaf stormed and sacked the
town. His bitter hatred of the Saxons and their fidth,
would naturally direct his fury against the place, where
his father had been compelled, from motives of policy, to
embrace their creed, — an event in which originated his
own ill-fortune.
It has been stated that, about 963, Edgar, who
reigned from 959 to 975, founded the present Church,
and rendered it coUegiate.* It would, thence, seem that
the edifice was then re-erected after Anlafs visit Were
this matter indubitable, we might from it infer how
greatly Tamworth had suffered at the hand of the ruth-
less Dane. But this opiiiion is destitute of any very
1 M.S. entmed " old notet of the Coltodce-hooM/* temp. Ov. I.
CASTLE AND TOWN. S15
good aad unquestionable authority; although there are
numy circumstances which give it the appearance of
truth. Leland was of a different opinion^ at least with
regard to the College. He says^ ^'I could not leame
of whose Erection the CoUedge was. Some thinke
it was a CoUedge befor the Conquest, others that it
was of the foundation of Marmion ; and that Opinion is
more likely to be true. Marmions, without doubt, were
the successe Lordes of the Casde."^ Camden also as-
cribes to one of this family both the building of the
Church, and the establishment of the College.'
The suppositions of these eminent antiquaries are
strongly corroborated by the facts of the oldest parts of
the edifice exhibiting the Norman style of architecture,
and of the deanery and prebends being originally in
the gift of the possessors of the Castle. But, on the
other hand, on account of the remains of the dean's
house, which now stand, being certainly Saxon, the
foundation of the College would seem to be referable to
Edgar. Questions of a similar nature might be equally
raised on both sides. We can hardly hope to arrive at
a satisfiEictory determination, when Leland was unable
to obtain any exact information. He possessed the ad-
vantage of having visited the town before the dissolution
of the College, and the loss or destruction of the records
of the Church; to which he most probably had access.
He also might then have conferred with ecclesiastics,
who would be &i better acquainted with the institution,
than any later persons could be. Perhaps the best and
fidrest conclusion, which we can draw, is, that the
Marmyons re-built the Church and extended the College,
previously commenced by Edgar.
1 Itin.,TOl.nr.,p.80b.
216 TAMWOBTH
Whatever may be the uncertainty regarding the foun-
der, it is indubitable that the Church was rendered
coUegiate at a very early period. The first time we
have yet found the dean and chapter mentioned, is in
1257. They then purchased from Philip de Marmyon,
the advowson or right of presentation of the church of
St John the Baptist, at Bfiddleton, in Warwickshire;
which was afterwards served by a stipendary appointed
by them. This they retained until the general dissolu-
tion.' They ako possessed, it seems, the manor of
Middleton; for, after its division between the three co-
heiresses of Philip de Marmyon, a third part was held
of the Church, in 1S2S, by Alexander de Frevile and
Joan his wife, of the inheritance of the latter, by
service of is. i^d., and the third part of a half-penny.'
In the inquisition, taken in 1266, of the extent of the
royal manor of Wigginton and Tamworth, which we have
previously named,* it is said that the dean and canons
received the profits of the fiurs and markets belonging
to the king, worth annually il. \0$., on the Stafibrd-
shire side of the town, and 50«., on the Warwickshire side.
The next mention of the Church is in the taxation
of pope Nicholas lY., about the year 1291. The
Church of St. Editha at Thamwurth, in the deanery of
Thomwurth and Tuttebur, was then valued at fifty-five
marks, — 86/. 1S«. 4d., the tenth part being five marks
and a half, — SL 18s. 4d. : ako, it was stated that the
church of St John the Baptist, at BerkesweU, in
Warwickshire, was valued at twenty marks per annimi,
over and above the yearly pension of one mark, which
the ooll^iate Church of Tamworth received out of it In
what manner this payment was acquired, we do not know.
1 Dotdate'sWtfwIduliiit. 9 Inqais.. 17 B. II. s FftfeTt.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 217
The CoU^e consisted of a deanery and six prebends.
These were^ Amington^ or the deanery ; Syerscote ; Wil-
necote; Coton; Bonehill; Wigginton; and Comberford.
The two ktter were usually associated together^ and
often considered as forming but one prebend.
The deanery, at first, lay in the gift of the lords of
the Castle. To it, Alexander de Freyile presented
Walter de Chetwynd, on the S4th of October, 1304;
and Hugh de Babfaington, on the 15th of November,
ISIO.^ But the next presentation, that of Henry de
Cliff, on the 6th of January, 1316, was by Joan, wife
of Thomas de Lodelow, and youngest daughter of Philip
de Marmyon.' However, in 1328, we read that ^'Ma^
gistejr Bicardus de Oloucestre habet literas Begis de
presentatione ad decanatum de Tamworth, ratione ter-
rarum et tenementorum quae fuerunt Alexandri de Frevill
defuncti.'" But it had returned to the same Joan in
1348 ; for it is then said that ''Hen. Hillary et Johanna
uxor ejus habent advocationes Decanatus de Tamworth
et prebendarium ejusdem ecclesi® coUegiatee."^ After
the death of this lady, without surviving male issue,
the disposal of the deanery seems to have rested entirely
iu the crown.
We here give the names of the deans after Henry
de Cliff/
1320 Isembard de LongeviUe.
1328 Bichaxd de Oloucester.
1329 Bobert de Chelcardo.
1347 Baldwin de Whitney. He was presented to the
prebend of Bishopshull in lichfield-cathedral,
on the 18th of July, 1849.''
1 aMAppflndU:— Noteai. S Lkhftdd rw»nl8. 3 TaniMr'i Not ManMt.
4 lb. ft Montft. AngUc.:— edit. 1880. 0 Hanrood*8 Htot of Uch.
218 TAMWOBTU
1369 Walter Pryde.
1S7S Beginald de Halton or Hilton.
1889 Thomas Iberye or Ivorye.
1891 William Cotingham.
1891 John Massingham.
1899 John Bernard.
1408 William Fountefreyt. (Feb. 10.)
1429 Clement Denston.
1480 Thomas Budbome.
1485 John Delabere. (Feb. 1.)
1484 William Newport. (May 18.) He held the pre-
bend of Longdon^ in lichfield-cathedral.^
1486 John Bate.
1476 Balph Ferrers, living 1496.
From what has been already said, it may be seen
that the gift of the prebends was in the same hands
as that of the deanery. But for the time, Wilnecote
and Coton were at the disposal of Ralph Basset, lord
of Drayton. To the former he presented Simon de
Wycford, in 1898; and to the latter, Roger de Cloun*
ginford, on the 22nd of June, 1801. But, on the Srd
of September, 1842, Baldwin de Frevile preferred Tho-
mas de Whitney to Wilnecote; as the king did John
de Kendall, on the 18th of July, 1848, and Henry de
Ingleby, on the 17th of September, four years subse-
quently. To Syerscote, Richard de Tettebury was
presented by Thomas de Lodelow, on the 12th o(
October, 1808; and Hugh de Hopwas, by the king, in
1849.' This latter ecclesiastic was a native of Tamworth^s
and rose to some dignity in the church. On the 8th
of August, 1858, he was inducted into the living of
Clifton-Campvile, at the presentation of sir Richard de
I II«nvood*8 Hilt of Lidu 9 Lk^Md noonis. 9 8m Appendix :—K«te 99.
CASTLE AND TOWN. S19
Stafibrd. He erected a chantry there^ in 1861^ for the
spiritual welfare of his patron^ Maud his wife^ and
Isahell his former wife.^ In 1858^ Hugh de Hopwas^
was elected chancellor or yicar-general of the diocese;
and, on the 20th of May, 1S6S, he was appointed pre-
bendary of Curborough, in the Cathedral-church of
lichfield. He died in 1388.' To Wigginton and
Comberfoid, Henry le Stoke de Solihull was preferred,
on the 18th of June, 1811, by Ralph le Boteler. To
the same prebends, Edward III. presented Thomas de
Keynes, on the 28th of June, 1869.' This clergyman
was constituted by the king keeper of his park and
forester in the bailiwick of Ascit, for which he was
allowed the sum of 2d. a*day, during the term of his
natural life. His decease took place in 1867/ Con-
cerning Coton, on the decease of Boger de Clounginford,
there arose a dispute between lady Joan, widow of
Alexander de Frevile, and Henry Hillary and Joan his
wife. But by agreement, dated at Middleton, on the
Saturday after the feast of St. Hillary, 1889, it was
settled, that lady Joan or her heirs should present in
this first vacancy and in the one ensuing ; Henry Hillary
and his wife, in the third ; lady Joan in the fourth and
fifth vacancies; and Henry and Joan in the sixth; and
then they were to exercise the right alternately. To
this agreement were witnesses, master Edmund de
Hereford, master Soger Hillary,' master Roger Quili,
John de Lee, John de Ixmgdon, and others.' In con-
fonnity with this arrangement, lady Joan nominated
Robert de Whitney, on the 26th of January next
ensuing.' Of the prebend of Bonehill, we have not as
iShair'sStefltartih. S Harwood*s Hiit. of Lidi. S Lidiflcldneordi. NotMonM.
4 Brdcfwlck:--edlt. 1844. S In the court-rolls, iSlS, he is mentknied m bdng
**Pinon of the chvch at Alrewlch." 0 lotaitnie, la B. III. 7 lichlleid records.
220 TAMWOETH
yet seen any record previous to nearly the end of the
15th century. The presentations to all the prebends
seem to have wholly fidlen to the crown, at the same
time as the deanery. The Church is very frequently
mentioned as one of the king's free chapek from
1S59/ to 1527. In this latter year, Henry YIII., then
patron of the College, by letters-patent dated at Calais,
on the 14th of July, granted to John Golde, derk,
almoner of Mary, queen of Fnmce, the canonry and
prebend here, then vacant by the death of Brian
Darley.*
Each of the canons had his substitute or vicar at
Tamworth to officiate in his place, and perform his
duties. It would appear that a dispute of considerable
length arose between the vicars and the bailifi, relating
most probably to the local courts. On one occasion, the
matter proceeded so far that a bye-law was framed of
a very singular and rather arbitrary nature. It vras
ordained that no person should invite any vicar to his
table, under penalty <3t 6s. StL This amusing order,
infringing so greatly on the rights of hosjatality, was
framed on the 28rd of May, 1429.* We think it
questionable if it were ever carried into eflfect : no in-
stance of its enforcement has been placed on record. Some
years later, the king's writ, bearing date on the 7th of
November, 1458, was directed to the bailiA, ordering
that, as according to the statutes of the realm, ecdesi*
astical persons were not compelled to come to vievrs of
frank-pledge unless special cause should require their
appearance, they should exempt the vicars of the royal
free-chapel of Tamworth from those courts. The vicars,
at that time, were William Bolton, David Duffield,
I BrdMWlck. 9 Rymtr't FBBdcn. s Oooit-ioUB, 7 H. VI.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 221
Richard Sturgeys, Thomas Allen, Thomas Hull, and
Bichard Tatenhill.'
The revenues of the Church at Tamworth were not
at any time very extensive. In fact, its endowment
was so small that, alone, it must have been insufficient to
support the priesthood in a condition much above abso-
lute poverty. The increase of property, during the space
of about 150 years, did not much exceed the annual
income of SO/. Hence it is evident that the mainte-
nance of the dignity of the ecclesiastics here, the
continuance of the magnificent solemnities of public
worship, and the erection of the noble and splendid
edifice, were due to the voluntary offerings of the fidth-
fiil, occasional gifts dictated by the piety of private
persons, or to the ardour of the clergy themselves. A
few of the donations made by individuals to this Church,
we have met with.
In 1445, Nicholas Pydde gave to John, archbishop
of Canterbury, and chancellor of England; to John
Bate> dean of the Church, Robert Monter, William
Pydde, John Lynton, William Rouse, Thomas Ashcombe,
and John Longdon, clerks, and their successors, two
burgages situated in Lichfield-street, for their common
benefit.*
A person of the name of Jekes, in the reign of
Henry YI., obtained leave from the king to give a
messuage and garden in the town, to be converted into
a habitation for the use of the priests, who should
officiate as vicars here.'
Sir Thomas Ferrers, knight, by deed, dated on the
10th of February, 1495, for the health of his soul, and
the souls of Ann his wife, and of John his son and
1 Coaitrolli,37H.VI. 9 Ib.,S8H.VI. 3 Old notes of the CoUefe-boue.
G G
t22 TAMWORTH
heir^ and their progenitors, gave to the perpetual vicars
of the Church, an annuity of 2l6s. Sd. The payment
was directed to be made out of a water-miU called
Astford-milly two pastures, and all the other lands at
Claverley, in Shropshire, which sir Thomas Ferrers had
lately acquired of the gift of Henry Colle. The donation
was made on condition that the vicars and their suc-
cessors should, every week, say three masses of requiem,
and, on the anniversary of his death, celebrate for ever
solemn obsequies for the repose of the souls of himself,
Ills wife, his son, and their ancestors. The vicars were
to receive the payment in equal portions on the feasts
of Annunciation of the blessed Virgin Mary, of St.
.John the Baptist, of St. Michael, and of St Andrew
the Apostle. To the deed, were witnesses, Ralph Lawk-
ford, and Thomas Gresley, knights; John Ferrers, heir
of sir Thomas ; William Ferrers ; John Alcock, rector
of Ibstock; John Blount; James Kayley; and others.
The last grant, which we have to name, is that of
lady Dorothy, widow of sir John Ferrers, knight By
indenture, dated on the 20th of October, 1630, she
made a feofiment to eight persons of the town and
neighbourhood and their sons with their assigns for
ever, of certain lands and tenements in Tamworth and
Wigginton, for the uses which she should afterwards
direct. Soon afterwards, she ordered that the bailiff of
the town should receive all the rents of the possessions,
and, on the 11th of July, cause an obit to be kept in
the Church, with the whole choir. On the evening of
tliis day, solemn dirge was to be sung, and mass of
requiem on the next morning, specially for the soul of
I Attached to thia deed, apart of the coinmonietl of the Church remaiiiBibiit no
■undent to make out the detlcn. There may stiU be decjphered upon it lvm
comivifB ic
h
^, i^tili^a'^ Btimtl), '^amtodrt'jj).
(Time of Henry VIII.)
Pubhahed by J. Thompson, Tamworth, 191G
CASTLE AND TOWN. 223
sir John Ferrers^ her late husband; her own soul; the
souls of William Harper and Margaret his wife, her
fiither and mother; and those of all Christians. After
directing the payment of fees to several persons taldng
part in the services^ and particularly for the vicars to
pray for the persons above named in their beadroll^ lady
Dorothy Ferrers directed that the Grey-friars at Lichfield
should sing dirge and mass of requiem, at the same
time of the year as at Tamworth, for ever. And each
friar there, being a priest, was, on the same day or at
least within a week after this time, to say one mass of
requiem. Ako the friars at Atherstone were yearly to
sing dirge and mass of requiem, in their convent. And
&rther, if it should happen that there were three or
four soul-priests at Tamworth during the celebration of
the obit, each should receive a small payment, if he
should assist. And, finally, all surplus of rents was to
be employed in the maintenance and improvement of
the property.*
Henry YIH., in 1534, assumed to himself the title
of supreme head of the church of England. Then by
a statute of parliament, the first-fruits of all benefices,
and spiritual dignities and the tenths of the annual
income of all livings, were annexed to the crown for
ever.* Consequent upon this act, a valuation of all
ecclesiastical foundations throughout the kingdom was
made by royal command, in the same year. The accoimt
given of Tamworth Church is as foUows.
'' Valuation of the Spiritualities and Temporalities of
the College of Tamworth.
The dean and canons of the collegiate Church afore-
1 Sec Appendix :^Note 33. s liogard.
224 TAMWORTU
said, have together in common lands and tenements,
called the Olebe of the prebends thereto, the yearly
value of 4/. Bs. Sd. Of the true portion of which rents
assigned to each canon, full mention is made under
the name of the canons below described: to wit.
THE DEANBBT.
Master Thomas Parker ^ the dean there,
Has and perceives yearly to himself
and his successors, of the lands of the
Glebe aforesaid, ISs^ id.
And of tithes, oblations, and other spi-
ritual emoluments, 20/. 6$. 8d,
The tenth part thereof, 42^. 21/.
STERSCOTE.
Master John Fysheryprehendary of the prebend ofSyerscate,
Has and perceives yearly to himself
and his successors, of the lands of the
Glebe aforesaid, 24». Sd.
And of tithes, oblations, and other spi-
ritual emoluments, 42«. 5d.
The tenth part thereof, Bs. Sd. SI. 6s. 8d.
MTILNBCOTB.
M, Richard Pygot, prebendary of the prebend of WSnecote,
Has and perceives yearly to himself
and his successors, of the lands of the
Glebe aforesaid, ISs. lid.
And of tithes, oblations, and other spi-
ritual emoluments, 7/. 6*. Id.
The tenth part thereof, 16s. SI.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 225
OOTON.
Master T%amas Holly prebendary of the prebend of Ooton,
Has and perceives yearly to himself
and his successors, of the lands of the
Glebe aforesaid, Se. 8d.
And of a yearly pension paid by mas-
ter Boger Dyngley, prebendary of Wig-
ginton, 40s.
And of tithes, oblations, and other
emoluments, 5/. lis. 9d.
The tenth part thereof, 16s. 8/.
BONEHILL.
Master John Wf/lkoks,prebendaryoftheprebendofBonehtll,
Has and perceives in lands of the Glebe
aforesaid, 16s. Sd.
And of tithes and other spiritual emol-
uments, 6/. 2s. 4d.
The tenth part thereof, lis. 7/.
WIGGINTON.
M. Boger Dyngley, prebendary oftheprd^endof Wigginton,
Has and perceives, in lands of the
Glebe aforesaid, 10s. Sd.
And of tithes, oblations, and other spi-
ritual gifts, over and above 40«. which
he yearly pays to master Thomas Hall,
prebendary of Coton, and his successors, 9/. 9s. 9d.
The tenth part thereof, 208.*'' 101.
The following is one of the numerous subsidies of
the clergy at Tamworth, paid, in common with other
churches, to the rapacious sovereign.
1 Valor KodctiMticui,S0H.VIU.:—TlniMlated.
226 TAMWORTH
''Mr. Thomas Perker, dean, paid zxx«.
Mr. John Fyssher, prehendary of Syrescote, iij#. j^. ob.
Mr. William Westoote, prebendary of Wylnecote, Yiij«.
-id. ob.
Mr. Thomas Hall, prebendary of Cotton, ix$. iiijcf.
Mr. John Wylcocks, prebendary of Bownel, xxs. iiijcf.
Mr. Roger Dyngley, prebendary of Wygynton, im.
Vicars choral and stipendaries : —
Mr. Greorge Plackeney and eleven others, y«. iiijd
each.**'
It is irrelative to our subject to speak of the altera-
tion in the fidth of this country, or of the political
movements by which it was effected. It must suffice
to state that, in the time of Edward VI., a total change
of ecclesiastical discipline was completed, the liturgy
altered, images removed from churches, the altars
abandoned for tables, and in short the church of
England established on those foundations, upon whiah
it remains at the present day.
The College of the Church was, in accordance with
a parliamentary statute, dissolved in 1547, and the
whole of the property attached to it vested in the
crown.* To each of the incumbents, a small stipend
was assigned for life; and these pensions were enjoyed
by the rejected dignitaries until 155S;' when, in conse-
quence of the accession of queen Mary to the throne,
the ancient faith was restored, for a short time.
In 1548, Edward VI. issued a commission, dated on
the 20th of June, directing sir Henry Mildmay, knight,
and Bobert Kelway, esq., to provide for the maintenance
and continuance of preachers here. Accordingly, after
1 Had. M8S. :— Shaw'i SteUbnlBhlra. The prebend of Comberfonl U not men.
tioned hen or In the Velor BcdedaBttcuB, beeanie It was onUml with that of Wissin^
% Old notea of the CcAlefe-hooae. 8 WiUis* toI. %* p. Sl8.
CA8TLB AND TOWN. £27
they had made a visitation, they drew up an order on
the SOth of July following, by which they ordained, —
that the Church should be permitted to remain and
serve as a parish-church ; — that there should be appoint-
ed a preacher or vicar, and two assistant curates; — ^that
the former should have an annual stipend of 20/., and
the latter 8/. each a year, payable by the receiver-gene-
ral of the county of Stafford; — and lastly, that the
preacher and curates should have for an habitation the
house, which the vicars of the College had formerly
enjoyed.
In exercise of her power, soon after her accession,
Elizabeth nominated a vicar to this Church. On his
cessation, in 1578, she appointed Roger Molde. The
name of the first vicar, we have not discovered with
certainty. But, on the 10th of April, 1578, there is
recorded in the Parish register the burial of ''John
Wright, Sacerdos." Three years subsequently, Elizabeth,
by letters patent, dated on the 27th of October, 1581,
in consideration that sir Henry Darcy, knt., and Peter
Ashton, gent, had conceded to her the late monastery
and the manor of Sawley, in Yorkshire, and on the
himible petition of this Henry Darcy, granted to Ed-
mund Downing and Peter Ashton, inter alia, all the
late College of Tamworth, with its rights, members,
liberties, and appurtenances, and the whole deanery,
and all the prebends of Wigginton, Bonehill, Wilnecote,
Coton, and Syerscote, with all their rights and members.
And all houses, buildings, lands, glebes, meadows,
pastures, commons, tithes, oblations, and emoluments,
belonging to the College, deanery, or prebends, and the
advowson, donation, free disposition, and right of pat-
ronage of the vicarage and Church of Tamworth. These
228 TAMWORTH
were to be held by Downing and Aahton, and their
heirs and assigns in fee-farm, as of the manor of East
Greenwich, by fealty alone in free soocage and not
in capite or by military service. And they were to
render annually 33/. 3«. Z^d. and 62/. Os. b^d. The
latter sum was to be appropriated in the following
manner. To the archdeacon of Tamworth, for synodals
and procurations, ISs. Id.; to the bishop of Coventry
and Lichfield, as a perpetual pension, S&s. 6d.; to the
vicar of Tamworth, for his stipend or salary, 20/.; to
two curates here, for their stipends, 16/. ; to the School-
master of Tamworth, for his salary, 10/. ISs. Hd. ; and
to the curate of TatenhaU, for his salary, 13/. 68. Sd.
But the sum was to be paid into the hands of the
receiver-general of the county, or into the Exchequer
yearly, on the feast of St. Michael the Archangel only,
and was to supercede aU other services and demands
whatever. But it was farther provided that if the sti-
pends should be paid immediately to the archdeacon,
bishop, and the rest, the acquittances of these parties
shown to the auditor should be a sufficient warrant to
him to discharge Downing and Ashton of the simis.*
Edmund Downing and Peter Ashton, having thus
acquired the College, deanery, and prebends, and the
advowson and right of patronage of the vicarage and
Church of Tamworth, by deed dated on the 21st of
February, 1582-3, granted the whole property, in fee
simple, to John Morley and Roger Rant.'
In the course of the ensuing year, — 1583, — John
Morley, and Roger Rant who was his servant, sold the
whole out in parcels to different persons. By indenture
1 Letten-Mtent, as Blii.
s The nst of the history of the Churcfi ia derived tmm Shaw*i Staflbrdihire, except
in those cues when we have girm other authorities.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 229
dated on the 10th of May, they granted, in fee-simple,
the deanery or prehend of Amington, and that of
Wigginton, with the tithes thereunto belonging, and
the advowson and right of patronage of the vicarage
and Church, to Thomas Repington, esq. The prebend
of Bonehill was sold to William Necton; that of Wil-
necote, to George Corbin; Coton, to Alexander Morley;
and Syerscote, to John Breton.
But queen Elizabeth, by her second charter to the
town, dated in 1588, some years after the grant of the
advowson and right of patronage to Downing and
Ashton, gave to the corporate body, in their capacity
of Guardians and Governors of the Free Grammar
School, the nomination and appointment of a preacher
of the word of God in the Church, and also of two
ministers, so often as they should be required, subject,
however, to the consent of the high-steward of the
borough. And they were to receive the annual stipends
of 20/. for the preacher, and 16/. for the curates, pay-
able by the receiver-general of the county, in equal
portions, at four terms in the year. And lastly, they
were to hold a house and garden in Tamworth, that
the late vicars of the College once inhabited, which was
to serve for ever as an habitation for the ministers or
curates.'
This singular grant to the guardians of the School of
power to nominate preachers and ministers, in opposition
to the right previously sold to Downing and Ashton,
caused some difference between the corporation and the
occupiers of the prebends, as we have mentioned in
speaking of the fairs. But between the guardians and
the Repington family there were very great and long
1 Charter, 90 EUs.
H H
230 TAMWORTH
continued disputes, concerning the right of presentation.
No legal decision was made, however, between the
parties, until nearly the close of the last century. After
some time, a compromise was entered into; and it was
agreed that, as in the grant to Downing and Ashton,
there was only specified ''advocationem, donationem,
liberam dispositionem, et jus patronus VicarisB et Eccle-
si» de Tamworth,'' and as the charter had expressly
the word "curates," the Repingtons should enjoy the
nomination of the vicars, and the guardians, of the two
assistant ministers.'
Nor was the difference between the Repingtons and
the corporation, the only one that occurred. Katherine,
duchess of Lennox, grand-daughter and heiress of sir
Henry Darcye, claimed the patronage of the Church
held by the former, the College-house assigned to the
latter, and the whole property formerly given to Down-
ing and Ashton, patentees in trust for sir Henry
Darcye. In 1630, she granted her alleged right of
presentation, and the College-house to Thomas Gore.
He, after commencing two suits to substantiate his
claim, one in the Exchequer, and the other at common
law, sold his title to Mr. Comberford, about 1639. This
last gentleman, on the Srd of February, two years
afterwards, sealed a lease of the house upon the thres-
hold to Augustine Fielding; and on the 4th of May,
1642, served Thomas Blake, who then held the place
both of vicar and curates, with a process out of the
king's bench, for occupying the dwelling in defiance of
him. Mr. Comberford eventually lost his claim.*
We quit the account of these tedious disputes, for
a time, to p\irsue our history in regular order.
I MS., temp. Ctf. i. s Old notes of tlie GoUefe-hoiue. Corpontloii records.
CASTLE AND TOWN.
231
Thomas Repington acquired^ as we have previously
shown, more especially the deanery and deanery-house
and the advowson and right of patronage of the vicarage
and Church of Tamworth. By deed of settlement, dated
on the 2nd of November, 1603, upon the marriage of
John Repington his son with Margaret Littleton, he
covenanted that he and his heirs should stand seized of
the premises therein mentioned, of which the deanery and
deanery-house, and the advowson and right of patronage
of the vicarage and Church, as belonging to and usually
RoosR DB Rbpinoton, of Reping-
ton, in Lincolnshire, signalized him-
self in the struggles between Stephen
and Maud for the throne ; and was
appointed cofferer to the Empress.
He m. Susanna, dau. of Richard
Scrope, of Bolton, in Yorksh. ; and
had issue,
I. Sir Ricbaed, of whom presently.
II. Jonas, m. Mary dau. of John Cheek.
III. John, m. Joyce, dau. of John de
Longton.
IT. Annabbll, m. John de Rochford.
T. Rachabl, m. Christoph. deStannton.
Sib Richahd db Rbpinoton,
knight, 20 H. II. He was slain in
a joust at Woodstock, in 1178 ; being
then seized of Frankingham, Dalder-
by, and Thorp-in-the- Willows, co.
Lincoln. He m. 1st. Marian, dau.
of sir John Lowther, knight ; 2nd.
Alice, dau. of John Chaworth. By
his first wife he had,
I. Thomas, his snccessor.
II. Matthbw.
III. John.
IV. Gbisaoon, m. to Henry de Sutton.
T. Judith, m. to John Mounson.
Thomas Repington, a soldier of
note, fought in the great and glorious
battle of Poictiers. But being dis-
tressed and taken prisoner by the
French, he was compelled to sell his
lands in Lincolnshire, anno 1367, to
sir Henry Marmyon, knight. He
waa^r. in the monastery of Sem-
pringham. By Ann, his wife, dau. of
John Peyton, he had issue,
I. Adam, who succeeded.
u. Ralph, m. Audry, dau. of sir John
Reppes, knight.
The £unily of Repington was one
of great antiquity, ori^nally seated
in Uie county of Lincoln.
Simon db Rbpinoton, living in the
time of William I or II, was father of
I. Rachabl, m. George Poyntz.
II. Ralph, his snccessor.
III. Gbbtaisb, m. a dan. of BoTile.
IT. Anthont, m. Aflkbel, dan. of sir
Robert de Worseley, knifht.
Ralph db Rbpinoton, of the
Leach, temp. Hen. I, succeeded his
father. He m, Audry, dau. of John
le Feame, and had issue,
I. RooBB, continnator of the family.
II. Hbnby, m. Joan dan. of sir John
de BaskenrUle, knight.
III. John, m. USA, Judith, dan. of
Thomas Hacket, co. of Lincoln.
832
TAMWORTH
enjoyed with them^ were part, to the use of this John
and Margaret, and their heirs male, in special tail,
with remainder to Humphry Repington, his second son,
in tail mail, with divers remainders over.
m. Tbom AS, m. JhUaimi, dun. of WilUun
Holitoa.
IT. Rom, m. Itt. John Blcnkcuopi
tnd. Anthony StreUy, of Bench.
Adam Rbpinoton, wu Jmtloe
of the Peace and Cnstoi Rotolonun
of the hondreda of KesteTen and
Holland, co. of linooln, and itandard
bearer to Richard II. Thia Adam,
in 1397, 21 Rich. II., took the abbot
of Crowiand pritoner ; for which aer-
▼ice he waa rewarded by Robert
▼iiooant Fitiwalter, general of the
field, inth a demi Antelope Galea
for hia creat, maned, bearded, taak-
ed, aod homed Or and billetted Ar-
gent Sana nombre, to be borne by
him and hia posterity for erer. He
had the wardship of Marian, dan.
and h. of John Lambard. He m.
this lady ; and in her right had lands
in Long-Sutton, eo. of Lincoln,
where she was bur. in 1399. He
had issue,
1. A DAU. ». sir John Camoys, knt.
u. Alb RIO A, m. AciamIU«by, co. Dert>y.
III. William, ton and heir.
William Rhpinoton. In 1422,
he purchased of sir William Clinton,
knight, a messuage; 500 acres of
land ; 100 of meadow ; 200 of pas-
ture, at Amington ; and the right of
fishing in the river Anker. This
acquirement brought the family of
Repmgton into connexion with Tam-
worth. He was auditor to Richard
Nevill, earl of Warwick ; and dying
in 1451, left by Alice, dau. of Helby
Acton, of Howleing, in Salop,
I. William, aaccesaor.
II. John m. Mary dau. of Ro|r. Blewltt.
lu. CiiRisTorHSR, m. Emma, dau. of
•ir Piers Vavasoor.
IV. Emma, m. William En^eberd.
V. Alick, m. John Mamhall.
William Ribpinoton, m. Emma,
dau. of John Thuretan of Great Wal-
dingfield, Sufiblk; and by her had
two daughters, and one son,
John Repinoton, who m. Colet-
ta, dau. and cob. of John Gold-
smith, of Goldamidi-Grange, Leioes-
tersh. He <f. in 1 4 72, leaving
I. WtLUAM, histaoccHior.
It. RosBRT, m. Jane, dan. of John Jann-
c]r,of Fothferinca7,Nofthamptoii8hii«.
ui. Jambs, m. Ann, dan. of sir William
Calthorpe.
IV. RicBAan, m. Eleanor, dan. of Rob.
PateshuU.
William Rbpixoton, eaq. of
Amington, m. Juliana, dan. of William
Stokes, of Foleahill, in the co. of
Coventry. He d, on January 30th,
1543, and liea bur,, with hia wife, in
Tamworth-Church> He left
1. Francis, his sQccesaor.
u.-m. Paiur and lluMrnaBv^tf. youag.
IV. Mabv, m. John Swynfen, of Swyn-
fsn-hall, CO. of Staflbfd.
V. Ann, ». Thomas Corbin.
VI. EoiTBA, took the vows and habit
of the order of St. Benedid, and be-
came a nnn at Polesworth.
vu. Katbbbinb, ». Robeit Burton, of
liodley.
Francis Rrpinoton, esq., in
1537. obtained from Edwmrd, lord
Clinton, a grant of the remainder of
hu lands at Amington, and d. seized
of the manor in 1551. By Maud,
dau. of Richard Cotton, of Hamstall-
Ridware, he had issue,
1. Thomas, named presently,
n. William.
m. RicaARD, a barrister, A«ir. at Tsm-
worth, July 1st, iSll. t.p.
iv.-v.-vi. JoBN, EowARo, HoMmaar,
unmarried,
vu. Maria, m. 1st. Kendal, of Smithsbr,
Sod. Clement Fisher, of PaiAinctoB
Magna, co. of Warwick, M. P. for
Tamworth. He died October 23. 1 819.
His grand -daughler, sister of Cle-
ment Fisher, of WUoeoote, m. Tho-
mas, son of John Wighcwick, sergeaot
at law, another M. P. of this town,
and founder of a charity here.
Thomas Rkpinoton, esq. He
purchased, in 1583, the deanery and
advowson and right of presentation
to the vicarage and Church of Tam-
worth ; and subsequently entailed it,
with his estate at Amington, upon
his heirs male. He d, 14th Dec.,
1615, and was bur, at Tamworth.
His wife Frances, dau. of William
CASTLE AND TOWN.
28S
Upon the resignation of the yicarage by Roger Molde,
John Repington and Margaret his wife^ on the 28th of
August^ 1610, nominated and appointed Samuel Hodg-
kinson to be vicar of Tamworth for life; and he was
to preach there at least once a fortnight. This John,
then sir John Repington, died in January, 1625-6,
leaving a son and heir of the same name.
The second sir John Repington, succeeding by virtue
Stamford, one of the jiutioet of the
common pleas, was aUo bur, here,
Jmie 2, 1598. They left issue,
L JoHH, taccessor.
n. Mart, bapt. at Tamworth, Jaly 10,
1507 j ter.April;, 1571.
m. HuMpnar.
IT. WiLUAM, hapt. at Tamworth, An^.
18, iur, Feb. 13, 1570.
SiK John Rbpinoton, knight,
m. 1 James I., Margaret, dan. of
sir Edward Littleton, knight, of
FiDaton, co. of Stafford. This sir
John bought an eatate at Atherstone,
with the manor, and built a house
i-alled the hall there. He d, January
23rd, 1625, and was succeeded by his
only son.
SiK John Rbpington, knight,
m. Elixabeth, dan. of sir Edward Se-
bright, of Besford, co. of Worcester,
baronet. He d, in June, 1662, and
was succeeded by his son,
Sebright Rbpinoton, who m.
1st. Catharine, dau. of sir Thomas
Bnrdett, baronet, of Formark, co. of
Derby; by whom he had one son,
Edward. He m. 2nd. Mary, dau. of
Sherington Talbot, of Lacock, co. of
WUts. He d. in 1698, and was bur.
at Tamworth. By his second mar-
riage, he had a son, Gilbert, (of
whom hereafter) and many other
diildren.
Edwaiu) Repington, succeeded
his father. He m. Anne, dan. oi
William Basset, of Claverton, co. of
Somerset, by whom he had two daugh-
ters, who d, 8. p. He d. Feb. 23,
1734, and was bur* in Amington-
chapel.
Gilbert Rbpinoton, esq., of
Amington-Woodhouse and London,
succeeded his half brother Edward.
He m. Jane, 9th dau. of sir Thomas
Vernon, knight, of London. He d.
in Feb., 1738, and was bur. at Tam-
worth. He had issue,
1. Sbbkioht, d. jowckg.
u. Bdward, of whom presently.
m. John, d. t.p.
IT. GiLBBar, a dergyman, ter. Sept.
Srd, 1749.
T. Cbablbb, named presently.
VI. Ann-Cabolivb, Atcr. Mar. 30, 1731.
vu. Elibabbtb, d, an inftmt.
Edward Rbpinoton, esq., a
major in the militia, succeeded his
father Gilbert. He m. Maria, dau. of
Theophilus Lerett, esq. ; and d. in
1759, «. p. He was succeeded by
his brother,
Charles Rbpinoton, of Aming-
ton-hall, a captain in the marines.
He m. Matilda, dau. and coh., —
with her sister Annabella, who m.
general William ^ Court,— of Tho.
Vernon, esq., of Twickenham-park.
He d. December 8th, 1764, leaving
a dau. Barbara, who d. at Stoney-
Stratford, Bucks, March 15th, 1775,
aged 22, unm,, and a son and heir,
Charles Edward Rbpinoton,
esq., of Amington-hall, b. October
26th, 1755. He was magistrate and
deputy-lieutenant for £e co. of
Warwick. He m. June 20th, 1805,
Catharine Jesse, eldest dau. of Henry
Fane Cholmley, esq., of Whitby and
Howsham, co. of York ; but had no
issue. He <f. June 27th, 1837.
By his will he passed his Amington
estate to his cousin, Edward Henry
k Court, a captain in the Royal
Navy ; reserving an interest in it to
his widow during the remainder of
her life.
234 TAMWORTH
of the entail to the advowson and right of patronage,
obtained firom Charles I. a confirmation of the gift of
queen Elizabeth to Edmund Downing and Peter Ashton.^
Upon the cessation of Hodgkinson, in 1629, he appoint-
ed, on the 12th of November, the rev. Thomas Blake
to the vicarage for his life. To this cle]^;yman, was
also given by the guardians of the School, the office of
the curates, so that he became both vicar and perpetual
curate, and resided in the College-house.' He was a
divine of some celebrity, and an active partizan of the
puritans, in the civil war. He died in June, 1657 ; and
thereupon sir John Repington, on the 23rd of Novem-
ber following, appointed Samuel Langley, M. A., to be
vicar, provided that he should in person exercise the
duties and preach in the Church once every Lord's day
at least, unless some lawful occasion shoidd hinder
him. Three days previously, the bailiffs and capital
burgesses had elected him to the offices of preacher,
minister, and curates of the Church.' This two-fold
election of each clergyman continued until the final de-
cision of the matter between the corporation and Re-
pingtons: it was mainly occasioned by the scanty
endowment of the Church. The rev. S. Langley did
not become resident in the town until the 1st of July
following.* He is mentioned in the most honourable
terms, in the Memoirs of William Whiston, a divine
well known for his Arian opinions.
Sir John Repington died in 1662, leaving a son and
heir, Sebright. Upon the resignation of Samuel Lang-
ley in this year, Sebright Repington, on the 10th of
November, nominated Ralph Astle, on condition that
1 Letters patent dated ii Not. 10 Car. 1.,— 1640. S Coipoxation reooids.
3 Indeatore, 1067. 4 Perish resistcr.
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 235
he should exercise the iiinction in person^, and preach
at least every fortnight, unless some unavoidable hin-
derence should occur/ This minister did not remain
very long here; for on the 16th of December, in the
following year, he surrendered the cure of Tamworth.
Thereupon, Sebright Repington, on the ensuing day,
re-appointed Samuel Langley to the place of vicar, upon
the same terms as his predecessor had enjoyed it. He
continued incumbent for nearly thirty-one years; and
died in 1693-4. Sebright Repington, on the 19th
of June following, — 1694, — ^nominated Samuel Col-
lins. And on the 1st of August, according to
usage, the bailifb and commonalty made him a grant
of the two curates' places; which the high-steward
confirmed.'
The rev. S. Collins, who from 1705 held the prebend
of Graia-minor in lichfield-cathedral, died in 1710, at
Tamworth. Edward Repington, having succeeded his
fiither Sebright, then exercised his right as patron in
favour of the rev. George Antrobus, whose appoint-
ment was dated on the 8th of January. He continued
sole incumbent, receiving the stipends of the vicar and
curates, with all other payments and benefactions given
by several persons, at different times, after the dissolu-
tion of the College: and whilst he continued here, he
inhabited the house appropriated to the minister. On
his death, in 1724, Edward Repington bestowed the
vicarage, the 29th of December, upon the rev. Robert
Wilson, who retained the living on the same terms as
those whom he had succeeded.
Edward Repington left no male issue. Therefore,
the advowson and right of patronage of the vicarage
1 IndMitiiRi iMs. s Oorpantton ncordt.
236 TAKWORTU
and Church of Tamworth passed, in 1734, to Gilbert
Repington, his half-brother. The latter died in 1738,
and was succeeded by his eldest son Edward.
This last mentioned Edward Reping^n had no issue ;
and his brother Charles, being his heir, became in 1759
seized of all the premises under the entail created by
the deed of settlement. The difference existing in re-
spect to the right of presentation to the Church, origi-
nating in the double grant of Elizabeth, had been
suffered very nearly to subside. But, when a vacancy
was expected from the indisposition of Mr. Wilson,
the dispute was renewed with great violence. On
the 13th of March, 1758, the corporation, appre-
hending that Edward Repington, under a plea of a
prior right legally vested in him, intended to deprive
them of power to present, ordered that the bailiffs should
immedietely cause a caveat to be entered in the consis-
tory of bishop's court to prevent any presentation from
being entered there under his "pretended claim,'' in
order that the right, on the decease of the incumbent,
might be brought to a l^;al determination. On the
1st of December, in the same year, immediately after
the death of Mr. Wilson, the corporation elected Simon
Collins, "as preacher and minister or curates," with
all profits and stipends belonging to the offices: this
appointment they confirmed on the 5th of January
ensuing.'
Charles Repington, after a short tune, claimed his
right. By indenture, dated on the 5th of May, 1759,
reciting, amongst other things, that the vicarage or
created vicarage, with the perpetual curacy of Tamworth,
had become void by the death of Robert Wilson, he
1 Coipantlon records.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 237
granted to William Sawrey, the vicarage with the
curacy^ and appointed him to be vicar of the vicarage,
and curate of the curacy^ for his natural life^ upon the
terms that he should reside at Tamworth, and preach
in the Churchy at least once a fortnight.
The rev. S. Collins refused to surrender the living to
the new incumbent. His opponent^ therefore, commen-
ced legal proceedings against him and the guardians
of the School who had presented him to the Church.
A verdict was given at the summer sessions at Stafford,
in 1761, in fiivour of the Bepington fiimily, and to the
total exclusion of the corporation. And Mr. Collins
was compelled to resign the incumbency in October
of that year. Mr. Sawrey, who was also rector of El-
ford, in Staffordshire, held the Church until 1793.
Charles Repington, esq., dying on the 8th of Decem-
ber, 1764, was succeeded by his only son, Charles
Edward Repington. He, on the death of the last
incumbent, presented the rev. Michael Baxter to the
Church, both as vicar and perpetual curate. This
clergyman continued here only two years; for his de-
cease took place in 1795. Thereupon, Mr. Repington,
in the same manner, presented the rev. Francis Blick.
Charles Edward Repington, esq., died the 27th of
June, 1837 ; and, as he had no issue, his family became
extinct By his will, he bequeathed his estates, with
the advowson and right of patronage of the vicarage
and Church of Tamworth, to captain Edward Henry k
Court, R.N., brother of William, lord Heytesbury.
His connexion with the Repingtons arose from his
grand-mother being sister of Mr. Repington's mother.
The rev. F. Blick was rector of Walton-with-RoUes-
ton, in Staffordshire; and also of Wisseth, in Suffolk.
I I
iS8
TAHWORTH
He, besides, held the stall of Pipa-parva, in lichfidd-
cathedral. He died upon the Srd of April, 1842, at
the age of eighty-seven years, after he had been the
Ticar of the Church for nearly half a century. There-
upon, Captain it Court presented the rev. Robert
Chapman Savage, according to the customary form, both
to the vicarage and perpetual curacy. Mr. Savage is
the present incimibent'
For some time, the living was considered only as a
perpetual curacy ; but a decision of the House of Lords,
towards the close of the last century, declared it to be
a vicarage.
Thii family is of Norman extrac-
tion, firom which descended
PiBRCS k Court, esq., of Ivy
Chnrch, in the co of Wilts, who in
1722, was parliamentary represen-
tatire for Heytesbory. He had,
amongst other issue,
GsNRRAL William k Court.
He was colonel of the elerenth regi-
ment of foot ; and member of par-
liament for Heytesbory. Heaaramed
the additional surname of Ashe, ac-
cording to the direction of the will of
his great nnde Edward Aahe, esq.,
of Heytesbory. He m. 22iid Fdmi-
ary,1746, Annabdla, dan. and coheir-
esa— with her sister Matilda, wife of
capt. Charles Repington, of AmiQg-
ton,— of Thomas Vemon, esq., of
Twickenham-park. By this lady,
who d. 1761, he bad an only son«
William Pibrcs Ashk i Court,
esq., b. in 1747. He sat as M. P.
for Heytesbory : and, on the 4th of
July, 1795, was created a baronet.
He m first, Catharine, dau. of lieuL
col. John Bradford, who d. «. p. He
m. secondly, 30th October. 1777,
Letitia, dau. of Henry Wmdham,
esq., of Salisbury, who d, in 1821.
By her he bad,
I. William, b. 11th July, 1779.
He succeeded to the baronetcy upon
the decease of his father. On the
17th of January, 1828, he was created
a baron of the realm by patent, with
the title of Baron Hrttksburt.
He became G. C. B.; one of the
Privy council ; and was for some years
ambassador firom England to the
Imperial court of St Petersburgh.
1 Set Appendix —Nott t4.
CA8TLB AND TOWN.
239
All the tithes^ and even the Easter-offerings, are
alienated. The value of the Hying is now ahout 100/.
a year. The stipends of 36/., the munificence of
royalty settled upon the Church. By the procure-
ment of lord Middleton, in 1707, 400/. was obtained
of queen Ann's bounty. The interest of a similar
sum is derived from several private benefactions; and
800/. was granted by parliament. This small endow-
ment is evidently a very inadequate remuneration for the
incessant exertions needed ia this extensive and populous
parish.
During the pastyeer, he was appointed
lord-lieatenant of Ireland, — a post
which this nobleman still enjoys.
He m. 3rd October, 1808, Rebecca,
bom 1783, — 2nd dan. of the hon.
IK^Iliam Henry BonTCrie, and grand-
danghter of ^^lliam, Ist earl of Rad-
nor. By her, who d. on the 6th of
October, 1844, he had
L William Hbvrt Abhb, b, nth Joly,
isaOb who Msmned the sumaine of
HdniM, on his manlage, Srd October,
18SS, with Bizabeth, eldMt dan. and
bcireat of sir Leonard Vfantley
Hobmes, bart., of Weatorer, Isle of
Wight,
u. PanosBicx Asn, b. at Naples, 15th
December, 1818.
m. Cbcilia*Marl4.
II. Edwakd Hsnbt 2t Court, b,
10th December, 1783 ; many years
M. P. for the boroogh of Heytesbory,
a captain in the B^yal Navy ; and,
since 1837, M. P. for the borough
of Tsmworth. To him, Charlea Ed-
ward Repington, esq., of Amington-
hall, bequeathed his estates ; and he
is now patron of the Church of Tam-
worth.
in. Cha&lxs Ashs ^ Coust,
Major-general in the army, C.B.
knight of the Gkielphie and other
distinguished . foreign orders. He
was b. 17th June, 1785 ; andm. 10th
May, 1815, Mary, only dau. of Abra-
ham Gibbs, esq. He has a son and
a daughter,
1. Charlss Hbhst Wtwdham.
u. BLisAaaTH.
lY. Lbtitia, m. the honourable
Wmiam EUot, earl of St. Germans.
She d. 1810.
T. Annabklla, m., 1805, Richard
Beadon, esq., son of the right rer.
Ridiard, bi^op of Bath and Wells.
Yi. Mabia, m. the honourable
Philip Pleydell BouTcrie, youngest
son of the earl of Radnor.
Yii. Carolins, m. 1818, Stewart
Crawford, M. D., of Bath.
THE CHURCH:
ooNTiinmD.
DESCRIPTION.
The peculiar features of its aichitectuie lead us to
conclude that the Church of Tamworth was rebuilt yerj
shortly after the Norman conquest; that it after e]t-
hibited the usual crudform arrangement, and consisted
of a Tower placed at the intersection of the NaTC,
Choir, and Transepts. The Nave possessed, at least,
a south Aisle, with a Crypt beneath it. Whether the
Choir had any Aisle, we cannot determine; but, upon
the south side, was placed the Sacristy or yestry.
About two centuries and a half subsequently, the
edifice underwent very extensive alterations. The Nave,
Aisles, Transepts, and part of the Choir, were rebuilt ; and
some parts, perhaps, then first constructed ; leaving only
the Transept-arches, Tower, Crypt, portions of the Choir,
and the Sacristy of the ancient structure. Shortly
afterwards, a large Chantry-chapel was added, upon the
north side of the Choir. It appears that it was erected
— ^partly at least, — ^by one of the Comberfords, as a
place of sepulture for the members of that fisunily, and
for the celebration of services for them. The Porches,
about this time, were either rebuilt, or first erected.
Another gieat alteration was soon made by the
erection of a laqpe and massive Tower, at the west end
of the Nave. The one of Norman construction, if it
had not been previously taken down, must now have
been removed.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 241
Hitherto the Church had retained acutdy pointed
roofiu The xemovai of Ihese^ the sahitLtution of others
of a much less jxitch, and the addition of clsrestory irin-
dowB along the Nave and Choir, fimned tlie next great
change in the general constructuxn of the edifice. The
onginal form of the roo&, hoivever, is still discernible
bjr the iveather-moulding on the east wall of Ihe Tower*
That of the Nave is partly external and partly internal
to the roof; and those of tiie two Aisles are traced
upon the corresponding north and south buttresses of
the Tower. This alteration, as might be expected,
required fhe reconstruction of all the windows situated
in the east and west ends of the Church. In hct,
the greater part of the gables have very evidently
been rebuilt.
In these fisw preliminary remarks, it has been our
intention merely to give an outline of the different
changes that have been made in the general arrange-
ment of the Church. Of the details, we must speak in
describing its separate parts. The numerous alterations
vdiieh hare taken jdaoe since the accession of Elisabeth
to the throne, might, perhaps, be thought to demand a
separate notice. But as all hare been merely modifi-
cations of the existing structure, they, too, will be
more appropriately given in the ensuing description.
We shall speak first of the Nave. It is very spacious
and lofty. It is separated from the Aisle on each side
by four large equilateral poiuted arches, which are
supported by piers formed of four semi-eylindrical shaflts
united together, up the face of each a square-edged
fillet runs vertically; with corresponding plain moulded
capitals and bases. The hood-mouldings are oontinuous
over all the arches ; and terminate at each end, generally
in a plain corbel.
£42 TAMWORTH
At some distanoe above the arches, a stoing-ooune
or projecting line of masonry runs along the whole
length of the Naye, at the base of the clerestory windows.
In the clerestory, there are six windows upon each
side. They are large and of good proportion ; and their
heads are fonned of the four central depressed arch,
commonly known by the name of the Tudor-arch,
although adopted some time before the reign of Henry
YII. As occurs invaiiably in all the windows through*
out this edifice, the mouldings of the jambs and
architrave are continuous, without the least interruption.
The two mullions, at the spring of the arch, simply
divide each into two curved branches, the inner of
which cross: and both the principal and subordinate
lights are foliated. The tracery, altogether, has rather
a heavy appearance. Externally each window is sur-
mounted by an ogee canopy, sparingly ornamented with
crockets, and finished at the spring by simple angular
returns.
Between each window, internally, stands a large
shallow niche, with an ogee canopy ornamented with
crockets and a final. Below it is provided with a semi-
hexagonal moulded bracket, which once supported the
image of some saint. Externally, betwixt each window,
is a buttress, which rests upon the string-course below
the window and terminates at the base of the parapet.
It is divided into two stages by a plain sloped set-off.
The upper stage is triangular, and, perhaps, was
originally surmounted by a small pinnacle.
The clerestory was similar on both sides. But, during
the summer of 1887, the south side underwent great
alterations. It was totally re&ced with stone, and the
windows repaired with new mullions and tracery. But
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 24S
the buttresses were omitted, and the canopies, being
formed plain, were made continuous by their angular
returns, except in every alternate one, where leaden
pipes are placed to carry off the water from the gutter
aboye. In all other particulars, the ancient design was
obsenred.
The roof of the Nave is now nearly flat, but appears
to have been of rather a higher pitch, eyen after
the adoption of clerestory windows. It is divided into
bays by seyen horizontal tie-beams or girdlers faced
with mouldings, which span the whole width and rest
upon wall-plates. They were eyidently once supported
by wall-pieoes, resting upon plain moulded semi-octago-
nal corbels placed at the summit of the niches between
the windows. Some of the corbels are destroyed.
Those at the ends stand alone, there being no niches
before the first and beyond the last window. A ridge-
piece runs along the whole roof. The slanting bays are
divided into four parallelograms, and each of these
into four squares in a similar manner. Bosses formed
of leaves and flowers are placed at all the intersec-
tions.
The parapets of the Nave are plain, horizontal, and
entirely of a modem construction.
In the year 1809, the Church underwent extensive
alterations and repairs. The expenses, except those
for repewing which were borne by the individual
proprietors, were defrayed by a public subscription,
amounting to 1,S00/. To this sum, were added the
profits arising from a musical festival, which was held
in the Church on the 21st and S2nd of September,
under the patronage of the marquis Townshend. The
receipts and donations amounted to 1,660/., 11^., and
S44 TAMWORTU
the expenses to l^8L ISs., leaving a sfapbis of SfM.
I89. Duxing the festiyal^ the Church was illumuutted
with lamps wreathed about the pillan, and was oma-
mented with many devices/
At that time^ a new entrance was made into the
Nave. The north Porch was stopped, and the principal
access to the interior formed through the Tower. The
old organ-gaUery supported by small pillars, which stood
at the west end of the Nave, was removed, and a ves»
tibule, with passages to the side-aides, was built of
brick, with lath and plaster decorations. It encroaches
upon two thirds of the last bay of the Nave. Over this
entrance into the Nave, the organ, with the addition
of a powerful choir-instrument, was placed; with
several pews. A flight of stairs upon each side of the
vestibule leads to the organ, and to the western end of
the gallery in the respective Aide.
The floor of the Nave seems to have been raised
considerably above the ancient one, perhaps between
two and three feet. It was flagged throughout in 1809.
This part of the Church was with the rest then fitted
up with firesh pews. Such seats were, we believe, first
placed ui the building in the time of Elisabeth. They
were removed in 1677, and new ones erected of every
shape, firom a triangular nook for a single person, to
others large and spacious for the accomodation of a
family. Some remains, bearing the date, may yet be
seen in the neighbourhood of the town. The pulpit
stood by the second pier on the north side, until 179S.
It was then removed, and a new one, with a large
reading^esk, erected against the first pier on the
south side. There it at present remains.
CASTLE AND TOWN. S45
The North Aisle is separated from the Transept by
a large equilateral arch, similar, in every particular, to
the arches of the Nave. This has, however, been entirely
blocked up, in order to support an extensive gaUery.
A modem square doorway leads into the Transept.
The four windows, on the north side, are large and
well formed, with simple-pointed heads. The two plain
muUions in each are completely debased, and the origi-
nal design cannot now be traced. They merely arch
round into each other at the spring; and a midlion
arising in the middle, and, immediately diverging into
two curved lines, divides the head into three subordinate
lights. The dripstone externally and the hood-moulding
within terminate by simple angular returns. Beneath
each window exteriorly, a moulded string-course protects
the wall hebw from the wet.
It is probable that these windows are referred to, in
the following note, which occurs in the Parish-register.
"1611. This yere, foure of the churchewindowes were
repaxed by one Cottrell, a Mason/'
The large west window has a four-centred, depressed
head. The mullions are also debased. There are five
which simply curve into each other; and a large oval,
with a curved line on each side, forms the tracery of
the head. The dripstone, hood-moulding, and external
string-course, were once similar to those on the north side.
Five buttresses strengthen the north wall of the Aisle
externally, besides two placed at the north-west comer,
at right angles with each other and the walls. Each of
them is worked into two stages by a gabled set-off,
formed laterally by five overlapping slabs. They termi-
nate, in the same manner, immediately beneath the
top of the parapet. The interval between the fourth
K K
S46 TAICWORTH
and fifth buttresses is occupied by the north Porch.
The parapets are plain and modem.
The exterior of the north Aisle having in the lapse
of time become much decayed, the buttresses west of
the Porch were, in 1840, completely rebuilt, strictly
according to the original design. The intervening wall,
however, instead of being refaced with stone, was
chiselled all over, and left in a rough state. In con-
sequence of this treatment, all the mouldings of the
jambs, architrave, and dripstone of the vnndow have
been entirely destroyed. The west wall and window
underwent a similar operation.
The roof is somewhat similar to but flatter than that
of the Nave; and has been painted a stone-colour.
On each side of the six tie-beams, was sculptured the
small figure of an angel; but nearly every one is
now gone. The wall-pieces, with spandrells serving as
braces, yet remain. Each was ornamented with the
large demi-figure of an angel, habited in the alb, stole,
and girdle; but, a few years ago, these fine pieces of
carving were removed. How far the design of this roof
corresponds with the original, we cannot tell ; for, since
the prevalence of the debased style of architecture, it
has undergone repair. This is evident fixmi the follow-
ing inscription carved upon the second beam: —
THIS ROOF MADE NEW BT A BRIEF ANNO: DOlC : 1731.
The floor of the Aisle is bricked; and is on the same
level with the Nave. The Aisle, itself, is pewed
throughout. A large gallery, supported by six small
iron pillars, occupies its whole length, and extends over
two thirds of its width. This was erected in 1793, and
altered and embellished in 1809.
The North Porch is a stone structure, and like all
CASTLE AND TOWN. 247
the rest of the Church has undergone very great
alterations. Until 1809^ it formed one of the entrances
into the edifice ; but it was then stopped, and converted
into a family burying-place. The front has been
stuccoed over and whitewashed. The entrance appears
to haye possessed an arch, or at least a canopy, of an
ogee form; but it has been completely rounded off
with plaster. Above this, and separated by a string-
course, marking the two stories of which the Porch
consists, stands, ornamented with crockets and finial,
but now nearly filled up,
« a Httle Gothic niche
Of nicest workmanship ; that once had held
The scnlptored image of some patron Saint,
Or the Blessed Virgin, looking down
On all who entered those religions doors." — Wordiwartk.
On each side, two circular apertures seem formerly to
have given light to the mimiment-room. The side-walls
are quite plain.
The interior of the Porch has been plastered over
and whitewashed, so that it presents very little de-
serving notice. The vaulted ceiling is elliptical in
shape, and groined. The longitudinal, transverse, and
diagonal ribs, spring, in each comer, firom a round pier
and plain moulded capital. Four thistle-flowers are
placed as a boss, at the intersection of the diagonal
ribs. The floor is modem, and raised very considerably
above the ancient level. The inner or inmiediate
entrance into the north Aisle has a simple-pointed arch ;
and the hood-moulding in the interior terminates in
corbel heads. But this doorway has been built up as far
as the spring of the arch, and the remainder converted
into a window divided into three lights by simple
curved mullions.
S48 TAMWORTH
The room over the entrance was aQoeasible only frota
the interior of the Aisle. An <^ee headed doorway on
the west side of the Porch^ led to a small spiral stair-
case built in the thickness of the wall and buttress.
The doorway in the Aisle had been built up for so
long a time that the existence of the room had became
sompletely forgotten. But^ in 1840, when some of the
buttresses of the Aide were rebuilt, the staircase was
opened on the outside. Nothing remarkable was found
in the room : the floor was strewed with decayed hoUy,
the remains of some Christmas decorations. The original'
ceiling had been destroyed. The roof exteriorly is acutely
pointed and slated. During the recent alterations, the
ctaircase was entirely taken away, the buttress built
up like the rest, and the wall made flat Access to
the room is, therefore, completely stopped.
In ancient times, the porch was not considered as a
mere entrance into the consecrated edifice, but as an
integral part of a church. Many different services took
place in it. Parts of the ceremonies of baptism were there
performed ; and near it, just within the Aisle, stood the
font. It was formerly considered unfitting that a person
should pass into the interior of the temple, until cleansed
from original sin by the sacred waters of baptism. In
this Church, the font retained its primitive position until
1809, when it was removed into the south Transept
The rite of matrimony, the churching of women after
childbirth, and the solemn commemoration of our
Lord's passion in Holy-week, were also here performed.
Porches also served, in some instances, as places for
public assemblies of the parishioners. When we read of
the election of officers, and payments of money ''in the
church," the porch .must be understood, and not the
CASTIiE AND TOWN. 849
naye or aisles.^ The room above the entrance was
sometimeB used as a school; sometimes as a muniment-
room, for the preservation of records and deeds of gifks ;
and sometimes it was made the permanent residence
of the sacristan. In the latter case, there was usually
an aperture into the Aisle, fix>m whence the edifice
might be overlooked, to ascertain its safety. Although,
in this Church, such an aperture with an ogee head
existed, this appears to have constituted a muniment-
room, because it was only lighted by the two very
small openings in fixmt, and was unprovided with a fire-
place.
The South Aislb, in form and general arrangement,
is very similar to that upon the opposite side, but is a
little longer. It is separated firom the south Transept
by two small arches like those of the Nave, except
that between the four semi-cylindrical shafts of the piers,
a hollow moulding has been introduced. These arches
have been built up to support the gallery, but a modem
doorway leads into the Transept. The top of the
southern arch has been removed, that a beam might be
introduced to support the firame of the door into this
gallery. Just above them, but at some distance below
the roof, a moulded string-course runs along the
wall.
The south windows correspond in number and form
with those of the other Aisle. But the two mulUons
in each simply divide at the spring of the arch
into two curved branches, the inner of which cross;
1 ThiH,on tlM 9901 of April, 1374, it wu directed at the cooxt-leet, that the Jonr
■hoold meet each week at the Church of Tamworth, "ad miuam roe* le Brothnr.
nweac,** that ii on the Monday, then to order and amend the lawa, made bj them at
thegnat conit: and none wereto omit thia, under penalty of 3«. 4tf. Ferhape the
brother-maaa was a maaa cdehrated for the benefit of members of tiie Holy Onild of
StOeonie. OcrtiinlyltiraiattadicdtosomeceBeralieUgloiiafiniiftemityinfhetown.
850 TAMWORTH
and a plain transom or horizontal bar separates the
principal lights into two. In the four-centred depres-
sed window, at the west end, the three mullions divide
but do not cross; and there is no transom. The
hood-mouldings aU terminate in corbel-heads. The west
window is deficient of this appendage. Externally the
dripstone of each of the windows is continued at its
angular returns as a string-course along both walls,
interrupted only by the buttresses. It passes, however,
oyer the buttress at the angle.
There are six buttresses. That at the angle is placed
diagonally, and is worked into four stages, by plain set-
oflb of two slabs. The head is gabled, and terminates
below the parapet. The upper stage has had pilasters
at the angles ; and the string-course passes oyer the top
of the second stage. The fiye buttresses on the south
side are deyoid of all ornament, are divided into six
stages, by plain set-o£b, and terminate a little below
the base of the parapet. Between the fourth and fifth
buttresses, once stood the south Porch. The doorway
into the Church has been bricked up; but externally,
as the wooden doors haye been allowed to remain, the
defect is somewhat concealed. The doorway is decorated,
and has been very fine; but it is now so decayed, that
the details can scarcely be traced. The surface of the
wall, formerly occupied by the Porch, has been plastered
over. In 1784, when this entrance was stopped and
the Porch destroyed, the whole of the exterior of this
Aisle was refaced with stone, the buttresses rebuilt,
and the windows repaired, at the expense of the
parishioners. Little of the original design, except the
shape of the windows and the doorway, now remains.
The roof of the Aisle is similar to the one on the
CASTLE AND TOWN. 251
Other side of the Churcli; except that the six beams
rest upon wall-plates alone^ there being no wall-pieces.
Upon the fifth beam^ is the following inscription: —
: THOMAS : : prat : and : : richard : haire : : chyrch :
WARDS : : WALTAR : CHADBTRN : 1671 :
The parapet is modem and plain; but at the west
end it is embattled^ and an attempt made at three
square pinnacles at the centre and ends.
The floor is modern^ haying been bricked in 1809.
In removing the old one, a quantity of the encaustic
tiles, which had formed the ancient floor, was discovered.
The greater part of them were placed in the Chancel,
before the communion-table, but many were given away.
The internal arrangements are similar to those of the
other Aisle. The gallery was, we believe, erected in
the time of Charles II., enlarged in 1793, and beauti-
fied in 1809.
There can be little doubt that, as was usually the
case, an altar dedicated to God in honour of the blessed
Virgin Mary,^ stood against the central pillar at the
east end. It would be protected by open screening of
wood, called percloses. In the north comer, yet stands
a pedestal, with three faces, each ornamented with very
fine panelling. It most probably bore the Virgin's
image. Before being whitewashed, it was apparently
handsomely painted.
Previously to the reign of Edward VI., there were at
least five altars within the Church. We have found
mention of those of the Holy Trinity, of the blessed
Vii^in Mary, St. George, St. Eatherine, and St.
1 Altlioncli oommonly Qaed for wke of brerity, the expraMbm that a ehnrdi or an
altar was dedicated to any uint or angel is emmeons, and liable to glye rite tomiaoon-
eeption. Chnrdies and altars were always dedicated to Ood, in lionoiir of some holy
belnt ; whose Intercessory prayers were more perticiilaily desired.
262 TAMWORTH
Nicholas.^ We can only point out the exact position
of one, with any degree of certainty.
Beneath the south Aisle, and of a much more ancient
date than that part of the Church, is situated the
Cbtft. It is entered through a trap-door in the floor,
close underneath the last window on the south side.
Thence a very narrow passage of considerable lengdi
leads eastward. This is modem, and not so wide as
the plain semicircular headed doorway, which forms
the immediate entrance into the ^ault. The original
access to it was unquestionably from the south Porch.
The Crypt was only lighted by two small square
splayed apertures, on a leyel with the surface of the
Church-yard. The one nearer the east end is now
obstructed. This place was originally designed to be a
chapel, wherein to perfixrm the services for the dead;
but, since the days of Elizabeth, it has been used as a
receptacle £ofr the bones accidentally disinterred in dig-
ging new graves in the Church-yard. The aspect is
certainly now very dreary. One is led to. exclaim in
the modified language of a great poet,
By t^ dim light, UieM relfet of tlie dead
Hato ■omrthiiig gbastly, dflsolafte, and drad.
But, in the mind of the Christian, other and brighter
thoughts will arise; and, with the devout Prudentius,
he may sing,
*< VenioBt dto hbcqIa, earn jam
Sodas calor oua revisat,
Ammataqne nangninft tIto
Habitacnia priitina gwtet.
QiuB pigra oadarera pridem
Tamidif putrefadA jaoebant,
Volnena rafdentnr in aorai
Animaa comitata priores."^-Clrea Sxegnioi D^fwuetorum,
1 See Appndtz :— Note tft.
CASTLB AND TOWN.
253
The obscurity of the place is so greats that^ for some
time^ the visitor^ descending from full day-light into
this damp and dismal abode of the dead^ cannot discern
its fiiU proportions. It is built of rag-stone^ vaulted,
and groined. It extends to the east end of the south
Aisle ; and is divided into four compartments or bays
by octagonal piers half sunk in the vrall, vnth corres*
ponding plain capitals and bases. These each support
s^mental groining ribs of a similar form, virhich pass
longitudinally, transversely, and diagonally. The floor
seems once to have been paved with encaustic tiles,
from the fragments which we have found in the earth.
The bones are stacked up in very regular order,
occupy the whole of the east end, and extend a little
more than half along the vault. Many, according to a
popular tradition, were brought from a field in the
neighbourhood of the town, where some battle had
once been fought. This we much doubt. They have
for years past increased very slowly.
L L
S54 TAMWOKTH
Coneenniig the east end of the Crypt* many vagae
reports have been cunent. It was beUeyed that from
it a long sabtenaneona passage eommnnicated with the
Casde* The Author and his brother, ha^e, several times,
explored the fiuthest recess of this dreary vault. By
caxefolly {riling aside the bones in advance* and creeping
at full length along the narrow track thus formed
between them and the roof, the eastern extremity was,
at length reached. We found nothing there, except
the remains of the ancient altar; the stone slab of
which is gone. The bones, at the end, are so rotten,
that they crumbled to pieces beneath our weight
We were unable to examine the floor at the base
of the altar: there being no room to stow away the
bones. In spite of all our efforts, they returned to oar
feet^ and their dull clatter seemed a reproach to us,
for disturbing their long and quiet repose in the
sacred place.
Lost to the living, — surrounded by the relics of the
countless dead, the horrors of whose prison-house were
feebly revealed by the dim light of a solitary candle, —
listening to the distant and almost stifled sound of a
muffled bell — ^for there was a funeral in the Church
above, — ^we seemed to have intruded into the abode <rf
the ''king of terrors." Imagination carried us back to
the time when these dry bones lived, and their silent
tomb echoed the solemn services of their church. In
vain the dead crowd prostrate round the ruined altar,
from thence no requiem follows them, for them no more
ascends the oft-repeated prayer.
On the wall of the second compartment from the
west end, opposite the aperture for the admission of
light, is a very ancient inscription. It is painted upon
CA8TI.B AND TOWN. 865
planter, and is now very much decayed. The foUot^ing
18 a representation of it : —
^Mnrvtair^m f&tl|iireVimiet$Mcl«)i
The discoyery of its meaning had frequently but vainly
been attempted. The decyphering of the greater part
of it fell to our lot. The first sentence is evidently a
Latin verse.
"O D*NTJS niYESj NON 0M*I TB'FOBE VIVBS :
FAC b'n' nu* V1VI8, POST mortb' viv'b si vis."
This may be thus rendered: —
O lord of wealth (and power,)
Hum ahalt not Utq for evermorB ;
Do weU whilst life thou haat,
If thou would'st live when death is pait.
The series of long letters underneath proved the greatest
difficulty. But the words are clearly^
M'E JESU XP'E,
a contracted form for ''Miserere, Jesu Christe." The
warning that man shall not live for ever, the admonition
to live well if he would attain life after death, and the
short but fervent cry for mercy, form the most appro-
priate sentences, which the walls of so solemn an
edifice could record.
256 TAMWORTH
It was contemplated by the late marquis Townshend^
when he was earl of Leicester, to conyert the Crypt
into a fiunily-tomb; but, there being no other place in
which to deposit the bones, he was obliged to abandon
the design. This vault narrowly escaped destruction
during the repairs in 1809. It was found that, from
the height of the roof, it would be necessary either to
remove it or to leave a portion of the floor of the
south Aisle elevated one step higher than the genend
level. After some debate, good council prevailed; and
the latter alternative was adopted.
That part of the Church between the Transepts,
where we stated that the Tower originally stood,
is remarkable for the massiveness of the walls, in
proportion to the rest of the Church. On either side,
stands a large semicircular arch, thirteen feet in span,
ornamented with indented and lozenge-shaped mouldings.
It is supported by plain square piers; and the corres-
ponding imposts or capitals give it a rather stilted
appearance. These present altogether indications of the
oldest form of the Norman style, and show that this
part may be referred to about the reign of William
Bufus. Up the edge of the wall feeing the Nave,
for nineteen feet, a moulding composed of the indented
a^d zig-zag forms is found. It is much concealed by
whitewash. In the remainder of the edge to the base
of the clerestory, a modem pannel has been introduced.
Upon the south side, behind the pulpit, this moulding
is destroyed.
The clerestory and the roof are continuous with those
of the Chancel. We shall describe them hereafter.
The floor is similar to that of the Nave and Chancel,
and lies upon the same level. This part of the Church
CASTLE AND TOWN. 257
is pewed. The Nonnan arches have been partially
built up, and a pew placed in each accessible by stairs in
the north and south Transepts. Some iron raib, bearing
the Royal Arms of England, stand at the west end, in-
stead of the east, where the rood-loft formerly was placed.
The North Transept hardly extends out so &r as
the Aisle, but is a little broader than the Chantry-chapeL
It is separated firom the latter by a large arch, similar to
those between the south Aisle and Transept, but rather
more obtuse. The north window, in general form, is
similar to those in the south Aisle; but the three
mullions simply divide at the spring into two branches,
without crossing, and there is no transom or horizontal
bar. The dripstone terminates in simple angular
retums. The buttress placed at the east angle, is
worked into three stages, the second of which is orna-
mented with a plain trefoil-headed pannel. The set-ofi
consist of two or three slabs. The buttress terminates
below the parapet.
There is a modem flat ceiling formed of plaster. The
roof has a double inclination, as in the Nave, and
runs transversely. The parapet is embattled, like that
at the west end of the south Aisle. When that part
of the Church was repaired in 1784, this Transept
underwent alterations of a similar kind; the expenses
of which were defrayed by lord viscount Weymouth.
The floor is bricked, and is below that of the Aisle.
Internally, the north Transept presents nothing to
attract attention. A large substantial staircase gives
access to the east end of the gallery in the Aisle ; and
a small wooden one to the pew in the Norman arch.
The opposite Transept, or, as it is usually designated,
the south Chancel, by being lengthened eastwards.
268 TAMWOBTU
astunifii the chancier of an Aiale. It is haxStj so
faroad as the Aisle of the Nave, which it adjmns.
There aze two broad simple-pointed windows on the
south side. In the first, the three mallions simply aidi
into each other at the spring; and the head is snbdi-
Tided in the same manner as the west window of the
north Aisle. In the second window, the oval subordinate
light is omitted. The dripstones haye simple angular
letums; as is the case with the hood-moulding of the
first The western window, in 1784, was blocked up
with stone as fiv as the spring of the arch, and a
doorway made through the wall, in order to fi>rm an
entrance into the Church, in place of the south P(»ch.
This alteration was made to afford the clergyman mors
convenient access to the Vestry, and the people to the
south gallery. Below the windows externally, moulded
string-courses run. The two buttresses are worked into
five stages with plain set-oft. They do not rise the
whole height of the wall, because an addition was made
to it when the roof was rendered flat.
The wall of the south Transept has been chiselled in
the same way as that of the north Aisle.
In the east wall, has been a large simple-pointed
window. It has been blocked up, in order that the
Vestry, when increased in height, might rest against
it. Under it internally a moulded string-course runs,
about twelve feet firom the ground.
In the east of the Norman arch, a semicircular
headed doorway, in which a modem square door has
been inserted, leads into the Chancel. Above this,
is a large long round-headed window, which evidently
formed a part of the primitive Norman structure. It
was no doubt blocked up, when the greater part (tf
CASTLB AND TOWN. S59
the Church was lebuilt, about the time of Edward III,
or Bichard II. It has been richly ornamented; but
three centuries' accumulation of whitewash has almost
obliterated the details.
The marks of the original high-pitched roof may yet
be traced upon the east wall, on each side of the
window. Parallel with the bottom of them, a few feet
below the present roof, a series of plain corbels projects
from the south and west walls. In the latter, they are
opposite the string-course in the Aisle, above the two
arches. Along the north wall, the corbels have only
been partially placed, and pass through the head of the
Norman window. It iei, therefore, very evident that,
at the east end, the roof ran loi^tudinally, but,
opposite the large Norman arch, it changed its direction,
and ran transversely. The present roof is nearly flat
It has four tie-beams ; and resembles very much that of
the Nave, but is not so much ornamented. The wall«
plates, on the north side only, rest on plain corbels.
The floor is bricked, and raised a little above the
Chancel, but on a level with the Aisle.
The internal arrangements offer little worthy of
notice. In the south-east comer, elevated by one step,
now stands the font. It is large, octagonal, devoid of
all ornament, and rests upon a stem of a similar shape.
There is a large old wooden staircase leading into the
east part of the gallery in the south Aisle, and a
smaller one, to the seat in the Norman arch.
There was once an altar at the east end. On the
sill of the first window, stands a small hexagonal
pedestal, ornamented on three sides with quatrefoils.
At its base are the initial letters It if. To what these
refer, it is impossible to conjecture. They were only
260 TAMWORTH
lately discovered by scraping off the whitewash; and a
mason cut them out in a much bolder relief than they
were found. The pedestal probably supported an image«
Very recently, our attention was directed to some
marks upon the south side of the east wall. On remo-
ving a very thick coating of whitewash, we discovered
that the wall is painted as &r as the place where
the altar had stood, and as high as the string-
course below the window. It is ornamented with
firetwork, white, but black at the intersections ; and the
large lozenge-shaped intervals are painted, in alternate
transverse rows, red and green. The centre is of a red
colour only; and, on this ground, are three female
figures, kneeling in prayer with upraised hands, and
turned towards the altar. They are each a little more
than two feet high, and painted white, the outlines of
the drapery being sketched in black, but the lineaments
of the face and the hands in red. From the costume
and style of execution, we should pronounce them to
be of the time of Edward III. or Richard II., therefore
nearly five-hundred years old. Unfortunately, the stone
beneath is so decayed, that these interesting remains
cannot long be preserved. In parts, the sweep of a
brush would bring off the painting; which is conse^
quently much injured, but unavoidably so, in the
exposure. The lower part of the first figure has been
destroyed, by the carrying of a gas-pipe across it On
the north side of the spot where the altar had been
placed, we can find no traces of decorations such as
these.
The Chancel is of the same width and nearly of
the same height as the Nave, but has rather a more
northern direction. This part is not divided from the
CASTLE AND TOWN. 261
rest of the Church by a Chancel-arch. This was often
the case in large parish-churches, which had regular
choirs with stalk. The separation then only consisted
of the rood-screen. But here no trace of it is now
to be found, not even of any ascent into the rood*
loft.^
The whole of the lower part of both walls of the
Chancel, is Norman, and buUt of rag-stone. The
Norman part is mostly limited above by a string-course,
running, fifteen feet firom the floor, on a level with
the lower part of the Norman window.
Beneath this window, in the south wall, is the
Norman entrance into the south Transept. Farther
eastwards, is the entrance into the present Vestry,
having the square-headed trefoil arch, which prevailed
during the twelfth and three ensuing centuries. And
still farther on, close by the altar-piece, stood another
similar doorway, now bricked up, which probably led
into the ancient Vestry, now converted into a place
for the deposition of lumber and rubbish. There are
no traces of sedilia or seats used by the priests, during
the chanting of the 'Gloria in ezcelsis' and of the
Constantinopolitan creed. Very frequently they were
merely formed of wood. The piscina or lavacrum,
used only in the ceremonies of mass, remained boarded
up until 1842. It is single, very plain, and pointed.
1 Hw ioo«l.loft was a gaUCTT placed OTor the leracDfSepantiBffliec
the nave, and nmainc the whole width of them. In the centre of it, itood the rood or
croai hcarfaig the tgvat oi our Lord, and on either side Sta. Marjr and John. Iti
porpoaca were manifold. It waa used for preacUng, prerlonBly to the introduction of
palpits into chorchea ; which did not take place before the thirteenth century. Fkom
it, were read the martjiology andkaaoni, and the foats and holidays announced to
the people. The passion of our Lord, and the gradual and other parts of mass were
sunt then, a snail organ being fixed there. On great festivals, lights were set up
In the lood-Urfti and, at Christmas and Whitsuntide, it was decorated with flowers.
It was ttsoany fcrmeid of wood j and waa considered requisite for every Church.
M M
26S TAMWORTH
There appears to have been a shelf: but there is no
basin. It probably projected from the wall^ and was
removed when the piscina fell into disuse.
In the Norman part of the north wall, has been
formed a doorway, in which is inserted a modem door,
and three fine arches of the decorated style, all com-
municating with the Chantry-chapel. The heads of these
are cinquefoiled, and each part again similarly divided.
In the Chancel, the first has been built up, in order
that the large monument of the Ferrers' fiunily might
be placed against it. The hood-moiddings have
circular returns: those of the second and third arches
are continuous. The first arch is placed at a greater
distance, and on a higher level, than the other two.
Beneath all three arches, altar-tombs are now placed.
Immediately above the string-course on each side,
are three simple-pointed windows, in the decorated style.
They are placed on the same level as the Norman
window of the south side. The hood-mouldings have
returns like those of the arches. The three windows
upon the north side were blocked up, when the Chantry-
chapel was built; they retain the ancient tracery.
Each was divided into two principal lights; and the
three subordinate ones were quatrefoiled. On the south
side, the mullion of each divides into two curved
branches: the dripstones externally are decayed away.
Above these, stand the clerestory-windows, at the
base of which a string-course runs. The first three
windows are simple-pointed. The three muUions, merely
divide each into two branches at the spring, but do
not cross ; and all the lights are plain. The dripstones
and hood-mouldings are ornamented with crockets and
finials, and terminate by demi-figures, particularly fine
CASTLE AND TOWN. 26S
externally^ where they consist of persons and priests.;
but some of them have been cut away, to admit leaden
pipes. On the south side externally, they terminated
in angular returns. Between these three windows,
within are shallow niches or. pannels, with canopies
ornamented with crockets and finials, and terminated
in sculptured heads. They are very much smaller
than those of the Nave.
The four other windows, two of which are above the
Norman arch on each side, are four-centred and depres-
sed; and the muUions are disposed like those in the
three. Above them, are ogee canopies terminated in
corbel-heads within, and angular returns without. These
windows are separated internally by niches like the
rest, but larger, so that the corbel-heads, serve both
for them and for the windows.
Between the windows, externally, are buttresses exactly
similar to those of the Nave. But there are none
between the first three on the south side. Here, the
Vestry and the Lumber-room are considerably lower
than the Chancel and Transept.
The large east window is four-centred and depressed.
The details are wholly debased. The central mullion
is very massive, and runs entirely through the head.
On each side, the mullions, at the spring, arch over
and intersect each other. A small perpendicular
mullion then divides the head into two parts; in the
inner of which a circular subordinate light is introduced.
The dripstone and hood-moulding are decorated with
crockets and finials, and terminate in demi-figures,
those externally being carved as griffins.
It is evident that the interior of the Chancel has
once been very splendid. The red painting of the east
864 TAMWOBTH
wall may yet be seen by scraping off the whilewasb.
On each side of the window is a niche^ sunnounted by a
canopy which projects considerably in front, and is
enriched with crockets and finial, and its interior
groined with numerous small rib-mouldings. The lower
part is hidden by the modem altar-piece. Immediately
above this, another niche or pannel, with an ogee
canopy, stands. A similar one, but much longer, and
divided into two parts, is placed on each side the
window externally: and a string-course runs along the
wall, some distance beneath. The walls, on each side
the window, have been refieu^ with stone, as low as
the string-course.
The two buttresses are placed diagonally at the angles.
That at the north angle, presents most traces of the
ancient form. It is divided into four stages, and has
once terminated in a pinnacle. The two upper are
placed triangularly; the inferior of these has been
panelled; and the set-off dividing them is gabled, with
crockets and finial. The other set-offs are plain slopes,
the lower formed of three slabs. The south buttress is
entirely square, and devoid of all ornament
The roof of the Chancel is between two and three
feet lower than that of the Nave. It differs from it
in retaining the wall-pieces, and in being devoid
of ornament. Of the wall-pieces supporting the eight
tie-beams, the first four rest upon corbels sculptured
into demi-figures and placed above the niches between
the window, except at the east end, where there is no
niche. The remainder rest on corbel-heads placed at
the summit of the niches. The parapets are horizontal
and plain.
The floor of thu Chancel is flagged, and on a level
CASTLB AND TOWN. 265
with that of the Nave. The oommunion-nuk axe raised^
one step. Between them and the conununion-table^
are placed the encaustic tiles found in the south Aisle.
They are charged with several devices and arms, the
ground heing led^ and the figures yellow. Amongst
them are, a fess between six cross-crosslets, for Beau-
ehamp, earl of Warwick; — ^three chevronells; — a lion
passant guardant, the letter M; and the fleur-de-liz.
The wooden altar-piece is large, heavy, devoid of
beauty, and in the Grecian style. It was put up in
1787. It bears, besides the ten commandments, the
Lord's prayer and the Apostles' creed, a painting of the
''pelican in her piety."
The Chantbt-cbapel, or as it is now most com-
monly called the North Chancel, extends £rom the
Transept to the east end of the ChanceL The four
windows upon the north side are four-centred and
depressed. The three mullions simply divide into two
branches, which do not cross in the centre. All the
lights are plain, except in the last window, where they
the quatrefoil is introduced. The moulded dripstones
terminate generally in corbel-heads. The large east
window is segmental. It consists of seven lights; but
the details are debased. The two central mullions
ardi at the spring into each other and to the jambs
of the windows. The next are continued through the
head; but the others only reach so far as the large
arch of the mullions. The central part of the head
is subdivided by two curves and a horizontal line. The
dripstone is ornamented with crockets, and ends in
corbel-heads.
On each side of the window, internally, is a niche,
which has been very fine. It is groined within, and
266 TAMWOBTH '
^surmoimted by a canopy, like those in the ChanoeL
The bracket, that once gave support to an image, was
sculptured into a cherub. Both are yery gready
mutilated.
The buttress at the angle is placed diagonally; and
is worked into three stages by plain set-o£b of two and
three slabs. The other three buttresses, upon the north
side, consist of two - stages, the dividing set-off being
formed of four slabs. All of them terminate at some
distance below the parapet.
The roof, which is very modem, is formed of seven
tie-beams, resting upon wall-plates: and these are
sujqported by plain corbels, except on the south side.
A ridge-piece runs along the centre; and each bay
is divided into squares by three purlins and four
rafters. There are no bosses. The roof is not so high
as that of the Transept. The parapets are devoid of
ornament.
The floor is bricked, on a level with that of the
Transept, and below the Chancel. Internally the Chan-
try-chapel presents nothing demanding attention, except
the sepulchral monuments, which we shall hereafter
give. An altar stood beneath the east window.
The modem Ysstkt is as plain within as plaster
and whitewash can make it. The window, upon the
south side, is square-headed, and divided by a mullion,
with some tracery at the top. The roof is plastered;
and the parapet plain.
The LuMBEB-BOOM, at the east end of the Vestry,
and included under the same roof, is built of rag-stone,
like the south wall of the Chancel. Externally it is
debased; having been foced with stone, and a modem
flat-headed doorway made on the south side, to afford
CASTLB AND TOWN. 267
an entrance from the Chuich-yaid. The small window
upon the east side is also flat and debased. It is
divided into three lights with semicircular heads.
The last part of the Church, of which he have to
speak, is the Tower, placed at the west end of the
Nave. It is a square structure, very massive, and
rather low when compared with the length of the
Church. At the comers, are placed four square turrets,
surmounted by lofty octagonal spires, and supported by
a buttress at the two angles, placed at right angles to
one another, and to the Tower. Each of these but-
tresses is worked into four stages, and terminates at the
base of the spire. The set-ofis are gabled, ornamented
with crockets and finials, and formed laterally of two
overlapping slabs. The second and third stages are
ornamented with panelling. At the south-east angle, the
buttress is continued into the west wall of the Aisle ; .
but, at the north-east angle, it is built over the wall,
and encroaches upon the window. However, that as
Uttle light as possible might be obstructed, the lowest
stage has not been made of so great width as the rest
from the sill of the window upwards. This plainly
shows that the Tower was erected after the Aisle, as
otherwise this peculiarity would not have existed. The
spires are now of considerable height. They appear to
have been originally very much shorter, and to have
been ornamented with crockets and finials. But they
have been so often repaired, and lengthened at the
same time, that they have acquired their present
proportions.
From their exposed position, ^ the spires have been
subject to many accidents from the weather, particularly
within the last fifty years. In June, 1795, part of the
968 TAMWOKTH
north-west one was thrown down by a stroke of lightening;
which considerably injured other parts of the Churchy
particularly the west window of the south Aisle. The
repair of the spire cost 74/. On the last day of Dec^n-
ber^ 1833, a high wind blew down a portion of the
north-east pinnacle. The fragments considerably dama*
ged the parapet of the Nave. On the 7th of January,
1839, a violent gale blew down the top of the south-
east pinnacle, and the south battlements of the Tower
were greatly injured. The north-east one was also
considerably displaced. Lastly, in the summer of 1843,
one of the north pinnacles suffered during a violent
thunder-storm. The two upon this side have since been
rebuilt or completely repaired. The terminations of the
buttresses at the north-west comer have been renewed,
but the crockets and finials omitted. The pinnacles are
• now surmounted by weather-fimes.
The interior of the Tower, forming the entrance into
the Church, has once been very fine. It was lighted
by three very large windows, with four-centred depressed
heads,— one between the Tower and the Nave, another
on the west, and the third on the south side. All
were similar in design, but now the last only remains,
the other two having been bricked up. The deformity,
however, has been somewhat concealed by the application
of cement, and whitewash. The window which still
exists, is remarkably shallow within. Externally the
jambs and architrave, instead of being moulded, are
ornamented with large pannels. The muUions are
debased; and the principal lights divided into two.
About midway, the three mullions curve round and
intersect each other. The same disposition again takes
place at the spring of the arch. The head is divided
OASTLS AND TOWN. 269
by two mullions conjoined below, and curved outwards,
firom the middle on the outer side of which two others
pass in a reversed direction downwards, thus forming
five subordinate lights. The dripstone terminates in
corbel-heads. Immediately below the window, the first
moulded string-course runs completely round the Tower.
Internally, there is a corresponding string-course carried
along the four principal sides.
A simple-pointed doorway forms the immediate en-
trance from the Tower into the Church. The mouldings
of the jambs and ardutrave, on die east side, are
obliterated. On the west^ they consist of three engaged
slender shafts, between the second and third of which
is a cavetto, where, in the architrave, a four-leaved
flovrer is inserted at interval. The first shaft, at the
spring, separates into two branches ; the outer continues
in a perpendicular direction to the string-course, thus
forming a square head. The spandrills are filled with
a circle, in which the quatrefoil is introduced, and two
trefoils: these are mere mouldings^ perhaps entirely
modem*
The western entrance is panelled within, and is
included under a square head, like the other doorway,
to which it bears great resemblance. But the pannels
have been greatly concealed by plaster. Externally the
cavetto, instead of passing along the architrave, continues,
v^ith the attached shafts, straight to the string-course,
thus assisting in forming the square head. The span-
drils are occupied by a circle, in which is a quatrefoil;
and these are cut very deeply into the wall. The doorway
is cemented.
There was once a very fine, elliptical, groined, ceiling,
formed of stone. Three small rounded groining-ribs
N N
270 TAMWORTH
diverged longitudinally, diagonally, and transveraely, from
slender shafts, which rose from the groirnd in each
comer. But, some time in the sixteenth century, it
was destroyed, in order to form a room for the greater
convenience of the ringers, helow that anciently used
by them. The floor of this new room intersects the
three windows of the Tower; and two of them were,
therefore, built up. The modem ceiling is still elKptieal,
but is formed of wood and plaster. The removal of
this stone ceiling must greatly have impaired the flim-
ness of the Tower. This, indeed, is painfully evident,
in the long cracks which have since appeared in ita
sides.
Although the loftiness en^toce of the Tower has thus
been diminished, it is still considerable. The whole
internally has been plastered and whitewashed. The floor
is flagged.
The staircase in the south-west angle, forming the
ascent to the Tower, is a very peculiar structure, and
forms one of the greatest curiosities of whidi the
town can now boast. Staircases of this construction
are said to be exceedingly rare, even upon the continent.
It consists of two spiral flights of steps, winding, one
above the other, round the same central pillar or newel,
so that the floor of one forms the roof of the other.
The whole is enclosed within a cylinder six feet in
diameter, and is lighted from without by long apertures
or loop-holes. The reader will gain a clearer idea of
this piece of architecture than could be conveyed in a
lengdiened description, from the engraving which is
given of it. It will be evident that two persooB
might ascend or descend, at the same time, and not
see each other, provided they took different stairs. One
0
l^v
^^^^'^'
>ea '^^'
1 tTc^oi
,Ti^P*^''
r^eJi^'
.\VOl
CASTLB AND TOWN. 271
of the stairs^ of one-hundred and six steps^ opening
below in the Chuich-yard, originally communicated only
with the top of the Tower, and, about two-thirds up,
with a short passage in the south wall. The other
stairs, opening within the Tower below, and con-
sisting of one-hundred and one steps, lead to all the
internal parts. During the last year, this staircase,
beuig much worn, was rebuilt throughout about two-
thirds of its extent ; but the original design was strictly
followed.
Of the two door-ways, the internal is plain. The
external one has been rather rich in ornament. The
head is trefoiled; and above is a large niche, with a
projecting canopy, and small groining ribs within. It
anciently contained an image; but now the whole is
very much worn away.
The utility of this curious structure is entirely un-
known, although it has afforded a subject for much
speculation. Plott guesses that it might be in order
that the Decani-copiatae, — ^in plain English, the sextons,
— to whom was committed the charge of ringing the
bells, and of burying the dead, and the diaconi or
sacrists — ^the deacons or sacrists, — that made the respon-
ses, and took care of the vestments and utensils of the
church, might perform their duties apart, each having
access to the tower without disturbing the other. Or
else it might be that the clock-keeper might execute
his office without troubling either of them.^ But, in
spite of his pedantic and useless display of patristic
knowledge, Plott shows that he either wrote without
reflection, or was exceedingly deficient in observation
during his survey of the structure. The incorrectness
\ Flott'f SUffonbhlK.
272 TAMWO&TH
t)f bis suppositions is directly evident from the fiict that
the outer stairs did not originally oommunicate directly
with the internal parts of the Tower. Our own opinion
incUnes us to consider the arrangement^ if it were
not merely an architectural curiosity, as one asmnning
somewhat of a defensive character.
Such does this appear to have been firom the general
construction of the Tower. The outer stairs might have
afforded to the inhabitants of the town^ and to the
watchmen of the Churchy' an easy access to the Tower
without interfering with the internal parts or obstruct-
ing the free passage to it from within the Church.
The Tower^ being of a much greater height, and
commanding a more extensive prospect of the sur*
rounding country than the Castle, would be preferable
as a place for watching and signals, and prove of great
use during the troubled times of the wars between the
houses of Lancaster and York.
In ascending the stairs from the Church-yard, the
visitor, about a quarter of the way up, comes to a
doorway leading up into the ringer's room. This door*
way is modem, the room being so. Perhaps the latter
was formed in order that the ringers might have a
place to which they could easily have access, instead of
one higher up, to which the stairs from within only
directly led.
The ringer's room presents nothing, except the
remains of the ancient vaulted ceiling in the comers.
1 Then wan fonnerly nrnlar wmtehmcn tsppotafbtd ha this Ghnrchi Iww giMt
fhdr number wm, we do not exacUy know. In October, lS99f the Goort-roUt slat*
that a hkoodj affray took place, during the night, between John le Cartwrigbt. Robert
his brother, WilUam Tack, and William son of William Symonds, and the wntchmen
of the Charch, as well as those of the town. The persons, whose names are obsb.
tioned, were very aeverely woonded and beaten. The cause of the dSstnibance is not
CASTLE AND TOWN. S78
A ladder afbrds the means of comxnunicatioii with the
cfaime-Toom above.
Nearly two-thirds of the way up the stairs, a narrow
passage is cut in the south wall of the Tower. Here
three large splayed apertures or • loop-holes overlook the
town and Castle, with the surrounding country. The
heads of these are trefoiled. Below them, is placed
the face of the dock, put up about the dose of the
last century: and underneath this, just above the great
window, the second string-course of the Tower runs,
which is foimd on all the four sides, but does not pass
over the angles. Above these apertures, under the
belfry windows, the third string-course, similar to the
last, is found. The stairs terminate by the door leading
to the summit of the Tower.
A short distance up the other stairs, which commence
from within, is a small square doorway. This was
blocked up during the late repairs. It was formed in
the lower part of the jamb of the south window, and
led by an external passage in front of the window and
above the first string-course, which is protected by a
small embattled parapet^ into a small room or recess in
the north-west angle of the Tower.
These rooms, several of which occupy the angles of
the Tower, are about five feet square. They are
lighted by three small plain loop-holes. The ceilings
are arched and groined. The semi-octagonal ribs spring
from plain cubical corbels in the comers, and run
transverse, diagonally, and longitudinally.
About half way up these stairs, a passage made in the
thickness of the wall, and lighted by two square
apertures, which are placed a little above the second
string-course, leads to another of the little rooms in
S74 TAMWORTH
the nordi-wett angle. Fiom this panage, two doorway
communicated with the chime-room, the nordiein one
of which is now nearly bricked up.
The ohime-room contains the clock. The chimes hsve
long been disused, and the zemains of the machinery
are alone found. In the north-east ang^, a doorway
leads into one of ihe small square rooms. From this,
a passage in the east wall, lighted by two loop-holes^
which penetrate through into the chime-room, conducts
to another of these rooms, in the south-east comer.
In the north wall of the diime-room, is a recess lighted
by a large trefoil-headed aperture, placed just above the
second string-course, now half bricked up. In this recess,
is a door fix>m which a flight of steps descends for some
distance, and then conducts by a ladder to the leads of
the north Aisle. From the bottom of these steps a pas-
sage runs along the south wall, and at the end, turns
eastward, conducting to the leads of the south Aisle.
Midway, a doorway opens upon the Nave. This must
have been formed after the clerestory; as otherwise it
would have been placed in the valley of the high-pitched
roof.
Higher up the stairs than the passage into the chime-
room, is the belfiry. This room is open to the roof, and
very lofty. It is square below, but above assumes an
octagonal 'shape. It is lighted by two large simple-
pointed windows on each side. The jambs and architrave
of each sie only moulded externally. The muUion divides
into two branches at the spring; and the lights are
foliated. In some of the windows, the mullion has been
destroyed: in two, it has lately been restored. The
dripstones are continuous, and terminate by angular
returns. In each comer of the belfiry, raised consider-
CASTLB AKD TOWN. £75
ably above the ^oor, is one of the usual smaU rooms.
Here they have rather lost their quadrilateral form,
some of the comers being cut off. In this case, the
corresponding corbel of the roof is deficient, and the
groining rib appears to emerge firom the wall.
There is a peal of six bell of considerable sise. They
are tuned in the key of E., are melodious, and so loud
as to be heard at a considerable distance firom the town.
They all bear inscriptions, stating the time at which
they were founded.
First bell.
I FOTJHBED WAS THROUGH CHARITIE, BT THOSB WHO
LOVB SUOB MSLODIE • 1672.
Second belL
I H S. KAZARENUB BEX IVDSOBUM, FILI DEI, MIS-*
BRERE MEI . 16S1.
Third bell.
OOD SAVE THE CHtTBCH . 16S9 . R W E W CHURCH^
WAR.
Fourth bell.
I SWEETLY TOLINO MEN DO CAIX, TO TASTE OK MEATS
THAT FEEDS THE SOULE . 1628.
W . SMTIH > I « ELLIS , CHtTRCHWARDBNS ; R . BRA*^
BIN , CLABKB.
Fifth bell.
BRTANU8 BLDRtDGE ME FECTT . 1656. T A N T.
Sixth or great belL
BOLAND FBANCE8 , HENBXE HIlL , OHUBCH WABDENS ;
FETBB 9OBTON , SIDESMAN . 1607.
BE . TT . KNOWN . TO . ALL . THAT . DOTH . ME . SEE .
THAT . NEWOOMBE . OF • LmCESTER . MADE • MB . 1607.
Two ancient customs are yet retained at Tamworth«
The ringing of the bell at six o'clock in the morning.
276 TAKWORTH
which fbnnerly called the people to the emly maM,
now serves to summon the inhabitants firom their night's
repose. The curfew, once the signal for persons to put
out their fires and lights, — a wholesome regulation when
the houses were principally formed of wood, — is stiU
rung at eight o'clodi in the eyening. But, although our
good ancestors retired so early, they rose at dawn of day^
On the ISth of October, 1448, it was ordered at the
court-leet that the dean of the Church should cause the
bell to be rung every morning at three o'clock.* In
these perverted times, it would only sound npon the
listless ear of sleep.
Higher up the stairs than the belfiry, there is a large
aperture, somewhat like a doorway, which overlook the
bells. The stairs then tenmnate at the door leading
upon the top of the Tower.*
The parapets are plain and embattled, with the coping
moulding continued down the sides of the embrasures,
and then returned horizontally. Beneath the parapet,
a hollow cornice-moulding is carried along the four sides,
in which a four-leaved flower and other ornaments have
been introduced. Near the ends of each of these, a
large gurgoyle, sculptured into a grotesque figure, served
to carry off the rain from the gutters. Almost all of
these gurgoyles are gone, and the rest greatly decayed.
The summit of the Tower is occupied by a high octa-
gonal basement, so large as to leave only a narrow path
around. It is generally believed that it was intended to
be the foundation of a large central spire; but, as is
1 CoQit rolli, V H. VI.
t 8tnB|«nwboTlitttlitChiinfli,iadeMndiBrlhmitli«1^0Wcr,anItalitoto
AiiiiataktandtekttlMwnnic >tain» m that thej And th«inielv«ft, it last, wltiiliitlM
Clnirdi,liiilMdoflBtlieClnirdi.y«id, llieaiiiioymnceoniaTiBttoreCnoetlialritepa
win be ATolded bjr obtenrlnr that the itain oommeBdiif flOEtcraally tenninafee aerenl
elept alMiTe the lerel of the oChen.
CASTLE AND TOWN. S77
often seen in large ecclesiastical edifices on the continent,
it was capped, and left for completion at a subsequent
period. When the shortness of the Tower in proportion
to the length of the body of the Church is considered,
this opinion does not appear to be destitute of foundation.
The windows in this building were most likely filled,
at one time, with stained glass containing many a figure
of a saintly person or pious donor, and rich with illus-
trations from scriptiural history and the legendary store
of the chmrch.^ But of very few of these have we now
any record, except in respect to the coats of arms, of
which notes were taken in the years 1590 and 1597.
They probably belonged to patrons and benefactors of
the foundation, or to their families.
1 Gu., three lions passant guardant Or; on a label of
three points Az., nine fleurs-de-liz of the second. —
Plantagenet.
2 Arg., on a chief Az., a mullet of six points Or. —
Clinton of Maxtoke-castle.
8 Gu., a lion rampant Or.
4 Or, three chevronells Gu. — Clare.
5 Az., between four martlets, a cross flory Or.
6 Az., a bend cotized Arg., between six lions- ramp. Or.
7 Chequy Or and Az. — ^Warren.
8 Quarterly, 1st and 4th Az., three fleurs-de-liz Or;
Snd and Srd Gu., three lions passant guardant Or.
— ^France and England.
9 Gil., three bars wavy Or. — Basset of Blore.
10 Or, a cross flory Gu. — ^Frevile.
11 Gu., seven mascles conjoined 8, 3, and 1, Or. —
Ferrers of Groby.
1 Fngjntatt of pointed glass have fk«qaently been fonnd on opening sraTes in the
Chorch ; bnt until lately no care has been taken of them. The hand of an episcopal
pcnonage raised in benediction, part of the head of a priest, and some small pieces,
were recently found bi opening a vault in the Vestry.
O O
278 TAMWORTH
12 Plantagenet.
13 Or, a chevron Gu, — Stafford, dukes of Buckingham.
14 Gu., a fess between six crofis-crosslets Or. — ^Beau-
champ, earls of Warwick.
15 Or, three piles Gu; a canton Ermine. — Basset of
Drayton.
16 Arg., three bars Az. ; with a label of three points Or.
17 Az., three crowns Or two and one.
18 a border of fleurs-de-liz.
19 Vairy Arg. and Az., a fess Or, with a....indented Gu.
20 Fretty Arg. and Sa.
21 Or, on a bend cotized Vert, three mullets Gu.
22 Or, a saltire engrailed Sa. — ^Botetourt.
23 Gu., on a cross engrailed Or, five roses of the first;
impaling party per pale Or and Az.
24 Arms for '^ Johannes Ferrers, miles, & Mat.. da
. . or. d'na Dorothea ux . . p'fat* Jo' Harpur."
25 And for "Johannes Ferrers, mil', fiP Tho' Ferrers.
Anna ux' fil . . Hastings, mil', & Matild' fil' Stanley
2 ux*." "Johannes Ferrers & Doro* ux' eius:
obiit 1512."
But these arms of the Ferrers were so mutilated and
so badly made that they could not be well described.'
Dugdale, about fifty years later, mentions only two
pieces of stained glass. One, in the east window of
the Chancel, depicted William the Conqueror in die act
of conferring upon Robert de Marmyon the Castle of
Tamworth and its demesnes. Below the representation
was written,
JUiCf per mnUtlmum Qtonqumovtm^ )9lo^
Itttnst imarmion i3omintt0 Qtmtlli effin'tur.
1 Htfl. M.S. :-8haw*s Stailbrdsh. The inscripUona assigned to the liMt two
anns have been inextricably conftiacd. They most have been rtry sadly broken.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 879
The second representation given by Dugdale is of a
lady and three daughters, and a knight and four sons,
all kneeling in prayer ; with the fragment of an inscrip-
tion below,
(er«w mttitijjf tt
H^na ttorot^ta
On his surcoat were these arms. Quarterly, 1st. Fer-
rers of Groby, with a label of three points. 2nd.,
Botetourt. Srd., Freville. 4th., Mountford. Upon the
mantle of lady Dorothy Ferrers, were nearly similar
arms ; but she bore those of Harper additional.
The whole of this stained glass was destroyed about
the middle of the seventeenth century, very probably
by the hands of the fanatical puritans. For then —
'*Tlie rererend pile lay wild and waate,
Profaned, diahonoored, and defaced ;
nuroagh storied lattioea no more.
In loftened light, the Bonbeams poor,
Gilding the Gothic sculptore rich,
Of shrine, and monument, and niche.
The ciril fury of the time
Made sport of sacrilegious crime :
For dark fanaticism rent
Altar, and skreen, and ornament.'' — Scott.
So that when Dr. Thomas visited the Church, the only
anns that he foimd were two of Repington, in the
east window, which still exist.
At the present period, a very few pieces of stained
glass remain, and those of exceedingly small dimensions.
They are all placed in the large window of the Chancel ;
and are as follows.
In the head, is a quantity of purple and orange glass,
not arranged in any very particular mode, which was
given by Mr. Arthur Wyatt, in 1809. On the right
hand, is a small but ancient piece. It bears the design
280 TAMWORTH
of a human skulls and under it a coffin maiked with
a cross and placed upon a tressel. Along the sides,
are short scrolls, thus inscribed: —
iiflorsf et StOitoto'
Vma toermfu^
VJollt et tfm
numorare ludiiMima
Over the coffin is a scroll.
^ifinnt mti Htva.
And another below.
IBisfce modt ^la morier6f«
Below this, are some fragments of painted glass formed
into the shape of a church : and under the last another
small but ancient piece, representing, as the title above
it states,
^dt lyes of Susmtnt.
Christ is there depicted as sitting in judgment upon
man. His right hand is raised in the act of
benediction, and His left merely extended. He is
attended, as usual, with an angel bearing the cross,
others sounding trumpets, and the heavenly host. The
right side of the piece is much mutilated; but there
remain two vfords,
9Mti» mtU
of the short but glorious invitation to the mansions of
everlasting rest On the left, stands a man, and over
him a scroll containing the fearful sentence of con-
demnation,
5to maUttirtu^ V ijpie' et^mu^
Many bodies are rising from their tombs, some with
only the head appearing, others half out. The prevailing
colour of the two old pieces is yellow.
On the other side of this window, are these arms, —
CASTLE AND TOWN. 281
Ghi., a fess indented Ermine, between six biUets Arg.,
— ^for Bepington ; impaling Az,, an eagle displayed Arg.,
anned Ghi., — ioft Cotton of Hanurtall-Bidware. Beneath,
18 another chuich made np of fragments; and under
diat a second coat of arms, — ^Bepington; impaling
Arg., three bars Ac ; on a canton Or, a fess, and in
chief three masdes Sa., — for Stamford.
In the three blank decorated windows on the north
side of the Chancel, some aims and designs have been
painted, but are much fiided and discoloured, either by
the lapse of time, or by the ignorance of persons who
hate repainted them.
In the first or eastern window.
1 Bendy Arg. and Az., in the dexter chief a mascle.
2 A chevron between three flenrs-de-liz Or.
In the second window.
1 Arg., a boar's head erased Verif; impaling Sa., a
chevron Arg.
2 Quarterly, three crescents, one in chief and two in
base. These are only sketched in black lines.
In the third window.
1 Sa., a fess indented between three mullets Arg. ;
impaling Arg., a chevron in a border Verif
2 A very rough drawing of some part of this or
another church, and only remarkable on account
of the buttress at the end being depicted as
pinnacled.
There are a few other little pieces of painting in these
windows ; but of them nothing can now be made out.
When we discovered the painting on the east wall of
the south Transept, the sheet containing the account
of that part of the Church was in the hands of the
pxinter, (see page 260). More extended research enables
882 TAMWOBTH
U8 now to give a better description of these inteiesting
remains.
The south half of the wall has been painted over with
fiet-work, as we stated; and, in all the red loaoenge*
shaped intervals, a black crescent has been introduced.
This part has plainly repiesented the day of judgment
Besides the three female figures fiidng northwards,
CTidently placed for those who shall be living at the
second advent of our Lord, there are opposite three
naked demi-figures, priests from their shaven crowns,
rising firom a tomb. These face in a contrary direction
to the others. In the interval between them, has
doubtless been a figure of Christ; but it has been
obliterated, and the wall plastered.
The remaining half of the east wall contains paintings.
These are considerably later than the other piece, and
are executed in a. much superior style. They are drawn
upon plaster : and have been so greatly injured that the
subject can only partially be made out. Under a four-
centred depressed arch ornamented with crockets and
finial, is the figure of a female kneeling by an altar,
on the edge of which her conjoined hands are placed.
Close to her and behind the altar, stands a bishop,
holding in the left hand a closed book, and in the
right a pastoral staff. The bishop's mitre is placed upon
the altar. In the upper part of the arch, a hand is
seen in the act of benediction, and seems significant
that the blessing of Heaven rested on the act performed
imdemeath. To the right, is another similar arch, with
the benedictory hand; but the subject below is com-
pletely gone. Under the left pillar of this arch, are
the remains of a female figure praying and turned
towards the bishop. The subject seems to be the
CASTLE ANP TOWN. 283
profession of a nun ; and may have related to the legend
of St. Editha, the patroness of the Church.
This piece has been very greatly mutilated by the
removal of portions, and the plastering up of the
crevices and hollows. Only one end of the altar
remains, all the lower portion, including the greater
part of the female figures, is gone, the bishop is
imperfect, in fact nothing is complete. At the com-
mencement of Elizabeth's reign, it was ordered that
all '^ superstitious'* paintings should be obliterated, and
appropriate sentences or texts from scripture written
over the space which they had occupied. The injunction
appears to have been fully carried out here. Parts
were broken down, the whole whitewashed over, and
sentences then written. We attempted to decypher the
inscriptions before proceeding to investigate the remains
beneath; but we found it impossible by any means we
could adopt. All representations of any of the three
Persons of the Blessed Trinity, even of the Son in His
humanity, were especial objects of destruction: and
hence we may account for the removal of the figure of
Christ, in the day of judgment. It was the sudden
termination of the piece, where this had been, which
led us to conclude that beyond there was no more
painting.
Having devoted a considerable space to the description
of the architectural details of the Church, we shall
conclude the subject, with a very few remarks on it«
general appearance.
Altc^ther it is a noble and venerable pile. The
Tower especially is remarkably massive and grand.
Flanked by its tuxrets and bold buttresses, siumounted
by four pinnacles of imusual dimensions, it bears an
284 TAMWORTH
aspect of greater me, solidity, and gnmdeur, than we
have seen in any other parish-ehuich.
Entering the principal door at the western end, we
stand in a lofty yaulted hall, which, although gready
robbed of its original proportions, yet retains a fine
appearance. We pass into the Nave; and a long per-
spective of pillars, arches, and deiestory, stands before
us. Internally it is spacious and lofty. The clustered
columns and pointed arches of the Nave and the decorated
character of the remainder of the structure contrast
strangely, yet not inhaxmoniously, with the heavy massive
Norman architecture of the Transept-arches.
The whole of the Church within has formerly been
very fine; but the eye is pained, at every point, by
evidence of the mutilation and destruction, which the
taste and repairs of the last age have wrought. The
walls are thickly covered and the fine moulding concealed
by an almost incredible accumulation of colouring and
whitewash. The original tracery of the windows has
given place to wretched specimens of the modem gotfaic
in its most debased condition. The carved oak roo6
have been deprived of their noblest features. The
ancient screen, forming the entrance into the Choir,
has disappeared; and iron rails, with tawdry gilded
scroll-work, obstruct the way. The eastern wall is
graced with a specimen of domestic Oredan wood-work,
intended as an altar-piece.
The mantle of ''one Cottrel a mason" seems but too
effectually to have descended on his successors. Every
repair afforded to this venerable fabric, has been made
the means of effecting injury — oft irreparable, — to its
details ; and it stands, at this moment, a striking mon-
ument of that dark age of architecture, from which
we are happily just emerging.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 28&
Thanks to the good taste now prevalent, the progress
of desolation seems to be at length arrested ; and, in the
style and execution of the most recent repairs, we
recognise the dawn of a long wished for day, when
every blow of the mason's hammer, every stroke of his
chisel, shall assist in restoring to us, and perpetuating
to our successors, the splendid memorials of the genius
and piety of our forefathers.
MONUMENTS AND TOMBSTONES.
Contrary to what might be expected from the size
and antiquity of the edifice, and from the residence of
several eminent fSunilies in the town and its immediate
neighbourhood, the Church does not contain a great
number of sepulchral monuments. Those of a modem
date, consisting, with but one exception, merely of
tablets placed on the walls, are similar to those usually
adopted at the present time, and do not rise very
greatly above mediocrity. There are also many grave-
stones placed in the floor, the majority of which pretend
to no higher merit than that of recording the names of
those who lie beneath. The few ancient tombs that
still remain, are alone worthy of especial notice, not-
withstanding the miserable mutilation which they have
suffered. Indeed, to such a degree have they been
defaced, that it is scarcely possible to trace their details,
and ascertain to whom they originally belonged.
The violation of these venerable memorials of the
dead, has generally been attributed to the parliamentarian
army, in the seventeenth century. The officers are said
then to have converted this building into stables, to
have caused the effigies on the monuments to be dis-
p p
286 TAMWORTH
figured, and to have torn up the brasses diat they
might enrich themselves with the paltry profits of thdr
sale. But, whatever the republicans may have done, it
cannot be doubted that a vast amount of injiuy must
be referred to others, both anteriorly and subsequently
to the civil war. The puritans are too often made a
scape-goat to bear the sins of persons less excusable
than they.
But however deficient the monuments and tombstones
may be in an architectural point of view, they are of
considerable importance. For the inscriptions which
they bear, convey much useful and interesting infimnation.
We will give an abstract of the whole throughout,
and describe those deserving particular attention.
On the floor of the Nave, are only five tombstones.
John Wilson, captain in the Royal Navy, died Sept
Ist, 1797, aged 66 years; Frances, his daughter by his
second wife, Dec. 15th, 1799, aged 22. Frances his
wife, daughter of Thomas Broadley of Hull, died Feb.
21st, 1769, aged 82. Mary Wilson, his second wife,
died April 9th, 1805, aged 60. Thomas Yaughton died
May 26th, 1759, aged 77 ; Mary his wife, June 6th,
1719, aged 38. Mary Dyall died Feb. 25th, 179S,
aged 75; John Yaughton, Oct 14th, 1777, aged 6S;
Samuel Grrundy, Nov. 21st, 1803, aged 53.
Sixteen tombstones are placed in the north Aisle. One
illegible. Ann Harding died July 21st, 1768, aged 28
years. John Watterson ; his wife Hannah died
Dec. 25th, 1744. George Arthur Herbert, of Glanhafiren,
in Montgomeryshire, died March 6th, 1821, ^ aged 36
years. Seliza Alford died Feb. 3rd, 1811. (Godfrey's
vault under the font. Mary Paull, died Dec. 27th, 1772,
aged 61. Elizabeth Bradgate died Aug. 3rd, 1761, aged
CA6TLB AND TOWN. S87
86. J. Marshall, of Wilnecote, died Jan. 18th, 1800,
aged 46. Josiah Marshall died April 6th, 1793, aged
78. Philip Bearcroft, gent, son of Thomas Bearcroft,
of Bradley, in Worcestershire, died Sept. Slst, 1695, aged
88; Elizabeth his wife, daughter of William Frith, of
Merevale, in Warwickshire, — she had issue five daughters,
—died April 8th, 1692, aged 81. Between the second
and third windows, is a large mural monument, the sum-
mit hidden by the gaUery. On it is the figure of an
in&nt, supporting and weeping over a medallion that bears
a profile of the deceased. Below is this inscription.
Quod laperert Johannis Hoicbr
Hie JQXta deponi Toluity
Unde oitom habait ibidem ut rediret.
Qnalif ent in arte Medica et Chimrgiea
Moltia non opus est loqni.
Teftantnr MorU et partnrientitim Labores relerati,
Piuriboa qnam ennmenure nunc est,
Panperibiu cqae ac LocnpletibaB,
Qnippe hnmani idbil a se aHenmn putavit.
Com annos cerciter triginti apod Londinensia
Fam« inaenriaaet,
Comparatia interim et opibna et amicia,
Et jam oedere poaset nti aator conviya,
Hnic commigrana vicinist
Ut aalati conauleret et otio,
In ipao itinere anfaito eat oorreptna*
Ang. 19, Anno D"*- 1769, iEutia 56.
To the right of the west window, is a small mural
monument. ftear
tbia Place lyea
tbeBodyof
Edward Wolyeratan, Gent.,
who departed tf»S# Life
May the 27th., 1761, Aged 69.
He waa the second Son
of the late
Rer. Mr. Stanford Wolverstan,
of Wooton,
in the County of Warwick.
Alao the Body of Alice Wolverstan,
Rdict of the Said Edward Wolventan,
who departed thu Life 7^- Jnne, 1766,
ageH 76.
Two stones below mark where the bodies lie.
288 TAMWORTH
On the opposite side of this window, is a laxge mnnl
monument recording the deaths of Elizabeth, wife erf
William Paull, May 26th, 1787, at the age of 2S
J^ears;— of Mary and Jane, their in&nt children ;-— of
William PauU, July 8th, 1816, aged 65,^— of Joseph-
Samuel, his son, Jan« 2Snd, 1818, aged 14 ;— of Elia-
beth, wife of William, Sept 20th, 1821, aged 50.
Fourteen stones, several illegible, lie in the south
Aisle. Walter Howe died Jan. 17th, 1798, aged 94.
Margaret, wife of William NichoUs, died in March, 17S5.
Elizabeth, wife of John Ball, died March 18th, 1742,
aged 45 ; John Ball, 17 . . aged 4. . Mary, daughter
of John and Mary Marriott, died Oct. 20th, 1790, aged
28; Mary, wife of John, March 11th, 1792, aged 65.
Ann Ball died Nov. 16th, 1778 ; her sister Elizabeth
Matthews, Aug. Ist, 1800, aged 91. Dightonmathe,
gent., died Oct. 16th, 1777. W. Lyon's vault. Steph.
Fletcher, of Manchester, died Sept. 25th, 1779, aged 60.
John Wilmot died Nov. 17th, 1821, aged 81. Walter Rose
died Feb. 9th, 17S0, aged 61 ; Jane his wife, Jan. 2nd,
1782, aged 68; Charles Rose, May Srd, 1770. At the
east end, on the floor beneath the pedestal that once
supported our Lady's image, are the remains of two
gravestones which have been employed in forming the
pavement. The date of one remains,
luNBi Anno Dobc.
1643.
On the other, are some arms, over which a stove has
been placed, — a fess, and in chief three mullets ; impal-
ing a chevron between three swans. The destruction
of the first stone is much to be lamented, as the date
corresponds with the time that the Castle was besieged
by the parliament's army, in the civil war. It is not
CASTLE AND TOWN. 289
improbably it bore the record of some person who was
slain at that memorable period. At the west end^ is a
stone, once enlayed with brass. There are the marks of
the figure of a man, above him a coat of arms on each
side of which is a child. In the comers, four squares
are cut out, and around the whole is a marginal groove.
On the east of the north Norman arch, is a small
mural marble to the memory of William Brown, of
Arkall-house, who died Oct. 16th, 1826, aged 47 years ;
his son Benjamin Bickley Brown died March 16th, 1816,
aged 9 months. On the opposite side of the same arch,
is another small mural marble.
IN THS NORTH CHANCBL
OF THIS CHURCH y
ARB DBPOSITKD THS RBMAINS OF
CHARLES EDWARD REPIN6T0N, sga".,
OF AICINOTON HALL, IN THS COUNTY OF WARWICK,
WHO DSPARTBD THIS LIFS
ON THS 27th of Junb, 1837«
AOBD 82 YXAR8.
Arms above: — Quarterly, 1st and 4th, Gu., a fess in-
dented Ermine, between six billets A]i^., — ^Repington;
Snd and 3rd, Arg., a firet Sa., and canton Ghi. — ^Vernon.
Impaling Gu., two helmets in chief A]i^., and a garb
in base Or — Cholmley. Crest : — a demi-antilope Gu.,
maned, bearded, tusked and homed Or, billetted Arg.
Motto : — ^VTRTUS PROPTER SB. On the south wall opposite,
is a marble monument, — ^Buth, wife of James Oldershaw,
surgeon, and daughter of John WUcockson, of Works-
worth, in Derbyshire, died March 15th, 1781, aged 46 ;
James Oldershaw, Sept. 1st, 1788, aged 68.
In the north Transept, are ten tombstones. John and
Mary Ann, infant children of Will, and Cath. Alport,
were interred Feb. 22nd, 1797 ; their daughter Marianne
died May 15th, 1821, aged 21. Ann, wife of Richard
S90 TAMWORTH
Freeman, died Aug* 22nd, 1790, aged 47; Bichaid
Freeman, Jan. 10th, 1807, aged 58. WilUama Bioe
died June 10th, 1805, aged 64. John Freeman died
Feb. 18th, 1814, aged S6; Bichaid Freeman, Dec. Slat,
1822, aged 42; John Freeman, Sept 5th, 1828, aged
72; Thomas Freeman, Sept. Srd, 1885, aged 58. Mary
RoUnson died Jan. 80th, 1821, aged 64. Thomas
Freeman died Dec. 2nd, 1822, aged 77 ; Alice Freeman,
March 2nd, 1826, aged 85. Edward Powell died July
Ist, 1787, aged 55; Ann his wife, Dec. 4th, 1792,
aged 61. Ahoye the door leading into the Aisle, is a
small mural marble stating that William Alport, of
Comberfordy died Dec. 5th, 1818, aged 58. On the
side of the stairs leading into the north gallery, is a
small neat mural monument, which, at the end of
the last century, was placed on the south wall of the
Chantry-chapel.
Hie sitam est Monmnentiim, dinteniitate Vero
Temporii et beUls phuqatm dTilibu dinitwn»
Famili», non ita pridem florentU GentU,
amplne et honeitB CoBCBBRVOROiomuif :
Qui da hoc Mnnidpio cnm in aliit torn
in hoc Templo sdificando optime memenmt :
Domini CoicBsmvomniJi indanere Anaif aeptingentis.
In RoBsmTO aatem noviitimo atirpii Amouacji
Sitfff^rditmrii Tiro Genu extinctam ploratar,
Qtni ohyt A.D. 1671 ; et hie, com ooniorte
Domina CxTHamiNA Batbs fitijaque doabni
Mabia et Anna, rais Heredihne. Tvimilo
oonditor. Nomen adhnc viget in stirpe
Hibemlaca, quae Rcgem Jacobum atewMftMi
In GaUiam aeeata eat ; atqne ibi Akolunls,
in ProTinda de ChoK^agne Dominio.
indgnitor 1725.
Arms above : — Gtu, a talbot passant Arg., — Comberford ;
impaling Sa., a fess between three hands erect A]i^., —
Bates. Crest:— out of a ducal coronet Or, a peacock's
head proper.
On the floor below.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 291
Samuel Bearoslky,
of Wiffffington, Geot., late Town-CIark
of this Borough > which Office he
accepted in the Tear 1742, and executed
with Ability, Proberty, and DUigenee,
till, on account of hia Ul-state of health,
he resigned in the year 1759.
He died Noir. 13th., 1760, Aged 43.
He married Elizabeth, ReUct of
Thomas Bott, of Coventry, Gent. ;
by whom he had no Issue.
She, out of her eoigugal Affection, caused
this Stone to be placed in Remembrance
of him.
Arms above: — ^Arg.^ two bars and a canton 6u. An
escutcheon of pretence^ — Quarterly^ 1st and 4th^ Vaiiy
Ennine and Gu., — Gresley; 2nd Gn.^ a lion rampant
Arg. ; 3rd, Or, a chevron Ermine, between three mullets
Gil. pierced of the field, — ^Bott.
Twenty-six stones are placed in the south Transept.
Mary Heath died Oct. S4th, 1780, aged 38. Of the
children of Benjamin and Johanna Milchell, Elizabeth
died Dec. 88th, 1725, aged 4 ; Mary, Jan. 4th, 1726,
aged 1 ; Benjamin, Jan. 29th, 1726, aged 1. Littleton
Wolverstan, gent., died Nov. 14th, 1769, aged 63.
Dorothy, relict of Timothy St. Nicholas, died June 20th,
1748; '^benevolentla, Pietate, ac predpue Charitate,
nuUi secunda.'' John, son of Joseph and Ann Heath,
died Oct. 29th, 1777, aged 11; John and Richard, their
sons, died young ; Ann, wife of Joseph, died June 10th,
1781, aged 40; Joseph, son of Joseph and Ann, Dec.
3l8t., 1833, aged 70. Henry Wood Roby died Apr.
6th, 1789, aged 1 year 11 mo. Sarah Dawes died Aug.
14th, 1724. Anne, wife of Joseph Hood, died Nov. 2ndi
1716, aged 28. The rev. Jonah Malkin died Aug.
22nd, 1766, aged 76; Abigael his wife, Oct. 7th, 1781,
aged 76. Timothy Vaughton died June 1st, 1778, aged
78. Elizabeth Malkin died Sept. 20th, 1799, aged 64;
292 TAMWORTH
Sarah her sister^ Sept. 2l8t, 1800, aged 74; Margaret
their siater, widow of Ralph Prentice^ May SQth,
1821, aged 88. Johanna Heath died Oct 24th, 1801,
aged 90; Joseph her son, July 10th, 1802, aged 71;
Mary his daughter, Apr. 19th, 1798, aged 20 ; Thomas
his son, Sept. 27th, 1821, aged 63. Ensign Benjamin
Yaughton died June ISth, 1779, aged 6S. Thomas,
son of Tho. Blood, of Bohall-st, died Jan. 16th, 17 . .,
aged 21. Benjamin Blood, gent, died May 7th, 1796,
aged 74. Abigael, wife of Thomas Homer, died Sept
22nd, 1701, aged 21 ; Thomas Homer, Feb. 27th, 1750,
aged 73 ; Mary his wife, Oct 4th, 1767 ; Dorothy their
daughter, Nov. 26th, 1794. John Yaughton, gent,
died Sept 24th, 1777, aged 78 ; Humphry his brother,
Aug. 24th, 1785, aged 83. John Clarke, M.D.; Eliza-
beth his widow died Nov. 10th, 1843, aged 82. Dinah,
wife of John Meacham, gent, died Jan. 27th, 1790, aged
62 ; John Meacham, gent., July 21st, 1798, aged 68.
Tho. Ball, gent Harriott Fletcher died Nov. 29th,
1838, aged 72. John Freeman, of Amington, died
March 29th, 1822, aged 32. Catherine Bloar died
June 16th, 1772, aged 88; Mary her daughter. Sept
1st, 1772, aged 54 ; Jane Bloar, June 10th, 1781, aged
61. Sarah Radford died Sept 13th, 1728. John
G^errard, physician, died in April, 1698, in his 33rd year:
he married Sarah, youngest daughter of Richard Taylor,
of Ansley, and had one surviving son. Above the
doorway into the south Aisle, is a small mural marble,
bearing a female figure weeping over an urn, on which is
inscribed, thy will be done. Below, is this inscription.
8ACEBD TO THB MBICOBT OF
JOHN CLARKE, M.D.,
OF London and of Wioointon lodob in this countt,
BOBN DSCBMBBK 19*^, 1760 ; DISD AUGUST SI"*, 1S15.
4f«eMcNi't kut MMe
7b th* heti ^f Htuktmdi, if mofl wemphrp qf Men.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 29S
Aniu:— Arg., on a bend Gu.^ between three pellets as
many swans ppr. An escutcheon of pretence, quarterly,
Ist and 4th, Az., on a bend between three lions' heads
Aig., as many escallop-shells of the first; 8nd and
Sid, Aig., on a chevron Sa., three fleurs-de-liz of the
first Crest: — A lark with wings expanded ppr., hold-
ing in the beak an ear of wheat Or.
In the Chancel. — On the south wall of the Chancel,
above the piscina, is a small tablet.
HnS TNDSR LYSTH IN TBKBBD THE BODY OF
HiNET MlCHBLL, GbNTL', AND MaKOARBT, HIS FIBST
Win; BT WHOM HB BAD T88VB THBBB SONNBS AND
IXATBK DAYOHTBBS; AMD BY KaTHBBINB, HIS 8BC0ND
Wife, whom hb leftb liyinge, two daughtbbb.
He was Iustice of fbacb, Yndeb Steward, and
TOWNECLABCKB OF TaMWOBTHB 36 YEBE9 ; AND
departed this life the 3. OF Dbcember, 1629.
On the same wall, is a large monument.
M. S.
Tho. Wilungton de Whateley in agro Wanne>, Gronerosi
Patru et m
Ijadem nominibiis, fortona, tandem tomnlo
Pk«matara aorte Hsredis ;
JuTenia oniatiaaimi
Ezimya tam natone qoam discipliiic dotibna instmcti,
Pectoria, nimimm, candore niTeo ;
Monun an'ma hnmanitate ;
Fronte aperta, Fide integerrima.
Studio in patriam, pro annia ardentiori ;
Ingenio prestanti, Doctrina hand irnlgari ;
Pietatis, deniq. (qnod snm'am decna eat) senan penitiori.
Tali orbata filio
lignbre marmor tenerrima erezit mater,
Maria, filiaram altera Johannis Swtnfen, de Swynfen, amig'-,
Viri gnfiiaimi* et inter huina aaltem oppidi monicipea satis oelebria,
Utpote qnomm olim, in snm'o regni aenatn,
Eximia cnm lande, din anatinnit vices.
Fratri Chariaaimo,
Hand proprina Sanguine ;
Qnam moribna ijtdemy caatiaaimia, SnaYiasimis,
Virtntnm conaenau,
Et Pietatia neceaaitndine cognata ;
Florentiaaima ilidem abrepta ^tate ;
In eodem conqniescit Tnmnlo,
Anna e aororibua lunior,
Ob«- Nov 6», 1711.
Q Q
294 TAMWOBTH
Anns above: — Gu., a saltire Tairy Axg. and Ax.; a
crefloent Or, for a difference. Crest: — a pine tree ppr.,
fruited Or.
On the north wall of the Chanoel, at the east end,
is another large monument.
Nere to thii pUee,
lyechintemd
J* body of Elixabbtr» dftugfata*
of WiLUAM NoBi^ of KimKBT, in 7*
County of Lbicb8TBB» Esq.,
Wife of Ralph AnDsmLBT of Aldshwas,
in J* oonnty of Stafford, Eso. ;
by whome ihe had isnie one sonne,
CHAnute.
She titer married to Ralph Fltbr, of Hints,
in y* laid oonnty of Stafford, Esq.,
and departed this life
the first day of May, A* D'ni mdclxi,
aged Lxxxii yeares.
To whose memory
S* Cbarlxs Addsrlbt, of Haicics,
in the comity of Warwick, K"^,
(her only Mnne)
erected this Monmnent
Arms ahove : — ^Arg.^ on a bend Az., three masdes of the
first; impaling Or, fretty Gu., a canton Ermine.
On the ground, at a little distance, but within the
communion-rails, is the stone of sir John Ferrers, knt.,
thus inscribed.
If trot hast a mindr to knows
wh08b corpbs intbrrbd libs bblowb,
LbaST THOY TRINKB THBSB words IN 8T0NB
Arb all that's lbft of him bbino oonb,
glyb barb vnto thb vtrioht tongyb
of whosobrb hb litbd amonob,
ThBN FRBBD FROM DOUBTB THOT WILT CONSBNT
hb i(bft a chorcbr moncmbnt.
Anno domini
1633.
Arms above : — Vairy Or and 6u. : those below, Sa., a
bend of lozenges cotized Arg. — ^Puckering.
Close by the last, upright against the north wall,
and enclosed in iron rails, stands the large modem
marble monument of the Ferrers' family. However
CASTLE AND TOWN. 295
anomalous in regard to the appropriateness of the design,
it is very good in point of execution, and serves to
exhibit an excellent specimen of the style prevalent in
later times. The two principal figures, of the size of
life, are arrayed in the ancient Roman costume, with the
flowing wigs worn in the time of Charles II. Both
kneel upon one knee, one with clasped, the other with
extended hands. Above each of these, is a cupid,
kneeling in the same way, who supports a large wreath
of fruits and flowers finely carved that descends over a
kind of sarcophagus from below a large funereal urn,
surmounting the whole. Beneath the principal figures,
in the centre, are carved in alto-relief a group of spears,
a bow, arrows, trophies, banners, a helmet, armour, and
other insignia of Roman warfare, an inverted torch, and
the ghastly head of Medusa with her snaky hair.
Betwixt the two cupids, are the following arms.
Quarterly of six; 1st, vairy Or and Gu. — Ferrers; 2nd,
Frevile ; Srd, vairy Arg. and Az., a fess Sa. — ^Marmyon ;
4th, bendy of six Or and Az. — ^Mountford; 5th, Bote-
tourt; and 6th, Puckering. Supporters: — a horse, and a
bear. On the right side of the alto-relief below, are
the arms of Ferrers ; impaling Az., a bend engrailed
between six martlets Or — Pigot: and, on the left side,
are, Ferrers; with an escutcheon of pretence, Arg., on
a bend Sa., three mascles of the field — Carleton.
On a tablet between the two principal figures, is the
following inscription, written by sir William Dugdale.*
Hie situs est
JoANKSS FsmftBRs de tamwokth-cabtro Arm.,
filios HuMFKiDi FsRaKRS eqa : aur : aniens ;
sntiqnissinii FiRBAnioRVM stirpis
(olim de Fbrrariis et Dbrbt Comitnm) heres mascnlns,
ac pnedpni ijnsdem familiae germinis, nltimns.
1 Hamper's life of Dogdale.
296 TAMWORTH
Qui qnidem Joakmbs, per haredei i
de Pebtill, MAmnioN, moumttoko, et BorsToumr
(quondam hnjiis Regni Btronibiu) oriimdiu.
Ex ANNA ocnqiige
DUDLiBi Cablstok, Equ. anrati,
■erenisiimo naper Regi Cabolo ab intmiis conniyf
Unios Clerioomm ;
fllimn nnieain, HunraiouM, Eqpi. aiiratiuD,
■c DomoTHBAM fitiam,
pneaobiU Ricabdo, Abbanub (in Hibemia) Comiti
(iUio nobUiaatnu Obmonls Dnds Jacobi
nata-MCondo) enaptam soioemt.
Diem obyt ziiu Angniti A" mdcucxx, ^tatis nm 52.
Jnxta beie pariter sitoa ett
HuMPBiDva FbbbbbSi Eqnei auratofl,
pnefati Joannis fiUna nnigenitos ;
qui Elizabbtbam, Gbbyasii Pigot de Thbumpton,
in agro Notinohambmsi, filiam, in ozorem dozit :
e qua filiam nnioam, nomine Annam,
modo anpentitem genntt ;
patre tamen yivo, die lezto Septembria, A* mdclzzviij, obgt,
^tat : nue anno 25.
Close below the last^ is an altar-tomb of finee-stone^
with ornamented compartments on the sides, in each of
which is the figure of an angel, supporting before him
a shield plain or defaced. On the top, lies a slab of
Derbyshire marble, once enlayed with brass but the
whole now gone. There are, however, the outlines of
a knight in armour, with his sword by his side, and,
on his left hand, of a lady ; the heads of each resting on
a separate cushion. Under him, are the marks of seven
children, and under her, of about as many more. The
principal figures are placed beneath a double canopy,
apparently once very rich; and, near the four comers,
the marks of as many coats of arms remain. The
inscription, also in brass, was once placed along the
bevelled margin of the slab. From the circumstance of
this tomb not being mentioned by Dugdale, it is
probable it was destroyed before his time : and it is not
known to whom it belonged. But we think ourselves
correct, from its style and other circumstances, in
CASTLE AND TOWN. 297
assigning it to sir Thomas Ferrers^ second of the &mily
who resided at Tamworth, and Ann his wife^ daughter
of Leonard Hastings. By his will^ dated on the 10th
of February^ 1496-7^ he bequeathed his body to be buried
on the north side of the Choir^ by the side of his wife ;
and directed that a marble should be laid over them^
with their portraitures and arms in brass, and such
inscription as his executors shoidd think proper. He
died on the 22nd. of August, 1498.
Below this, and under an arch between the Chancel
and the Chantry-chapel, is another altar-tomb of free-
stone, with small plain shields on the sides alternating
with a rose, oak-leaf, or another flower. It bears, on
the top, the figures of a knight in armour, his head
placed on a helmet and his feet on a d(^, and of his
lady, on his left side. The hands of both were raised
in the attitude of prayer. The figures are very much
mutilated ; for, besides the loss of the arms of both figures,
the legs of the man are completely gone down to the
ancles ; and the whole is so worn that very few of the
details remain. To whom the monument was erected,
is unknown ; but it was probably to one of the Freviles,
or to the first Ferrers. In Dugdale's time, 1640, it
was in a perfect state; and he gives a drawing of it.
Leland says, ''There be divers fayre Tombes of Noblemen
and Women, in the Este Parte of this Collegiat
Churche, where of one is of the Frevills, and Ids
Christen Name, as some say, was Balduinus; and he
was Lorde of Tamworthe Castle."' Perhaps this is
the one to which the great antiquary alluded.
In the middle of the floor of the Chancel, is a large
tombstone once enlayed with brass, all of which is
1 Itin., TOl. rv., fol. ISO b.
298 TAMWORTH
now gone, although a niiall portion remained about forty
years ago. It bears the outline of a figure^ a priest
apparently from the occurrence of the sacred chalice
on each side of and beneath him. Out of his mouth
issued a label that bore some brief ejaculation; and,
at each comer, is the mark of a coat of arms.
These are all surroimded by a broad groove for a
marginal inscription, probably with the emblems of
the four evangelist at the comers, from the circles there
cut out. It is impossible to ascertain to whom the
stone belonged: its original situation was at the west
end of the edifice, from whence it was removed to the
place which it at present occupies years ago. It is
most likely the tombstone of one of the deans of the
Church.
Adjacent are eight gravestones. John Hurt, gent,
died March 5th, 17S0, aged 82. William Brown died
March 16th, 177S, aged 60; Beata Richards his wife,
Sept. ISth, 1789, aged 73. Thomas, only son of
William NichoUs, clothier, died Jan. 18th 1769, aged
6S; his father, Jan. 18th, 176S. Mary, only daughter
of William and Mary Nicholls, died June 14th, 1773,
aged 59. Samuel Ball died Aug. 28th, 1772, aged 4;
Frances, March 29th, 1779, aged 2 ; Elizabeth, Nov.
15th, 1789, aged 19 ; Elizabeth their mother, Nov. ISth,
1802, aged 56. Edward Ball, jun., died Feb. 12th,
1784, aged 40. Samuel Crosland died May 2l8t, 1767,
aged 72; Ann his wife, Jan. 7th, 1768, aged 70.
Edward Ball died April 12th, 1779, aged 67 ; Mary his
vrife, April 27th, 1782, aged 62.
At the east end of the Chantry-chapel or north
Chancel, in the right hand comer, is placed a large
plain altar-tomb, on which lies a flat gravestone.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 299
Under this Stone lies
Airs,
the wife of Edwabd Rbpinoton,
of Amrngton-Hallt Esq.,
the Lest of y* Ancient Family of the
BaueU of CbtYerton, in MmenetMkire.
She died y« 21 of Octo., 1720.
Reader, wonld yon know her Character,
Ask the Present Age, whose
Posterity will transmit it to y« Latest
Times.
Arms above : — ^Repington ; impaling Ermine, on a canton
Gu., a mullet Or, pierced of the field, — Basset.
Under a low simple-pointed arch in the south wall,
is the recumbent figure of a female praying, the head
resting on a pillow, and the feet, on a dog, and the
hands raised in prayer. The whole is ancient: it is
much worn, and broken, and the features have been
completely chiselled away. It \b not known whom it
represents.
On the ground beneath, is a large alabaster tomb-
stone once with figures and a black-letter marginal
inscription cut in and filled with pitch. But the whole
is now effaced, except a few letters.
To the left adjoining, is a stone once enlarged with
brass, bearing the outline of a man, with his sword
by his left side. Near the upper comers, are the
marks of two coats of arms, and near the lower, two
circles are cut out : the whole is surrounded by a groove
for the ma^;inal inscription.
To the left adjoining, is an alabaster stone on which
is cut, the lines being filled with pitch, the figure of a
man praying, his head resting on a pillow, and a scrip
by his right side. From Shaw, it appears to be the
tomb of John, son of John Breton, esq., of Tamworth.
Along the margin, is this inscription.
SOO TAMWOBTH
<9rate pro anf ma Slo^'itf
qui
ifbiit xf tie mm». maiU ^nno t'ni m< t^ b(| :
ntitttc aU^e p^pfcietur Urate.
To the left, against the south wall, is a large plain
altar-tomb, devoid of any inscription. It appears to
have belonged to the Comberfords, as the mural
monument of that family was once placed over it.
Above the last, and under the first arch commimica-
ting with the Chancel, is a fine altar-tomb of marble,
bearing the effigies of a knight in armour, and of his lady
on his left side. His head rests on a helmet, and his
feet on a dog. By the cushion, beneath the lady's
head, is placed an infant: and at her feet a little dog
crouches, holding her dress in its mouth. Along the
side of the monument, are twelve fine canopied niches,
once each containing a figure in the posture of prayer ;
but the fifth and eleventh are now entirely gone.
The tomb was originally painted, as well as the arch
above. It bears the marks of malicious mutilation ; for
the upraised hands have been broken off, and the &ces
with other portions of the principal figures chiselled
away, as well as the heads and greater parts of the
smaller ones at the side. Around the margin, is the
following inscription.
l^ic iacent corpora Sloj^^(j$ d^tntt»f m\iiti»f tt
Vnt iBorotj^ee uxovia tim* qui quttt^ ^oh't»
obiit ib< Hit mm»i» ^uliif ^nno n^ni m^ H^^
xiU lEt Mcta li'na IBorotj^ea oibiit Hit
mft' ^nno Vni m^ H^ ^mv aTaSivs
propiciet' Hmti. ^men.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 301
The monument originaUy stood in the Choir, before
the image of St. Editha. It was perfect previously to
the civil war; and is named by Leland. He says that
the tomb of the father and mother of sir John was in
the Church: it is now gone, and is unmentioned by
Dugdale.
Beneath the second arch, is an altar^^tomb of firee-^
stone, bearing the figure of a woman, her head resting
on a pillow; and, at her feet, a dog. It is very much
worn; and the* arms are broken away. The tomb
exhibits the style prevalent in the middle of the
fourteenth century. Along the side, are six compart-
ments each containing a shield plain or ietaced. We
have every reason, except direct testimony, to believe
that this is the monument of lady Joan, wife of
Alexander de Frevile, and one of the coheiresses of
Philip de Marmyon. After her husband's decease in
1328, she held the Castle for a considerable period.
About the middle of the floor, is a large stone once
enlayed with brass. It bears the outline of a man
praying, his feet upon a dog. From his mouth, issued
a label. On each side of him, are placed six small
scrolls, and one beneath him. There is a groove for
a marginal inscription, with circles at the comers.
Adjoining the end of it, is a tombstone thus inscribed.
^ / Son of Tho., t* bzcbll<* m' of
H / MIDDLBWICH, IN ChKSHIRE,
o ^ B'* of Tho., fbllow and
ORNAMENT OF C. COL. CAM.,
Path' of Thomas, vie. of
KiNOBBUBT,
HUBBAND OF SaBA 44
Jl [ TBAB8.
CO \ From a fbixowship in C. C. Cam.,
INVITED TO SWBETBNHAM, IN
Chbshibk; THBNCB HITHBB, WBBRB
HB 8PBNT ONB HALFB OF HIS
LIFB. Til WITHIN 4 TEARS OF
R R
302 TAMWORTH
HIS DSCBA.8 WAS KSVSS HIlfDmBO
rmOM P&BACBINO IN COUHSB
TWICB BTBBT LoMO's DAT 80
BLABOBATBLT AS TO INFORM THB
LBARNBD IN DIWICULT TBXT8,
AND TBT BDirr THB MXANBBT.
HB OTBD Januaet 20*, 169f,
MTAT, 72.
On the north wall^ between the second and third
windows, is a small monument recording that John
Whyle died Jan. ISth, 1788, aged 82; Mary Hayward
his sister, May ISth, 1788, aged 84. There are twenty-
eight other flat stones placed in the floor. Charles
Edward Repington. . William Kadford died March 8th,
1766, aged 44. Edward, son of Edward Symonds,
mercers, died Jan. 14th, 172S, aged IS ; Anne his wife,
March 5th, 1748, aged 88. Ann, wife of Samnel
Badford, died July 5th, 1728, aged 89; Samuel, July
SOth, 17S5, aged 47 ; Sarah their daughter, July 22nd,
1768, aged 50. Joseph Rice, sen., died April 8th,
1780, aged 66. Edward Davenport died April 10th
1752, aged 52; Elizabeth his wife, Dec. 21st, 1755,
aged 60. Elizabeth, wife of the late John Meacham,
died Oct. 9th., 1775, aged 66. Sarah, daughter
of Richard and Sarah Bloody died Sept. 28th, 1775,
aged 46. John Meacham died July 28rd, 1747, aged
46; Mary, Penelope, and Thomas, children of John
and Elizabeth, all died young; Fitz-William Meacham,
their eldest son, died Aug. 12th, 1766, aged S8. Lieut
James Gray died Nov. 25th, 1791, aged 77; Ann his
wife, Dec. 17th, 1788, aged 68. Thomas Whitworth
died Sept. 5th, 1686. Ann, daughter of John and Ann
Shore, of Edstanston-hall, near Wem, Salop, died Nov.
2nd, 1734, aged 7 years. Matthew Birch, gent., died
Dec. 10th, 1778, egad 66. Anne, widow of Thomas
Lort, gent., of Yoxall, died Aug. 6th, 1719, aged 79.
CASTLE AND TOWN.
Ralph Triplet, gent, son and heir of Ralph, late of
Salop, M.D., and Mary his wife, died Sept. 7th, 1701,
aged 86: he left only two sisters, — ^Mary, wife of Tho.
Langley, clerk, — and Elizabeth. Robert Bage died
Sept. 1st, 1801, aged 72; Robert Charles Bage, March
9th, 1802, aged 13 ; Elizabeth, April 21st, 1805, aged
72. Samuel Green Jemson died Oct. 15th, 1794, aged
28. Mary Birch died July 13th, 1775, aged 67.
Samuel, second son of Samuel — ^minister of Tamworth
— and Sarah Langley, died June 5th, 1681. Esther
Langley, widow, died Aug. 16th, 1742, aged 85;
Rebecca, her datighter, wife of James Taylor, died July
3rd, 1755, aged 66 ; James Taylor of Birmingham, Sept.
6th, 1758, aged 66. Susanna, daughter of Waldive and
Susanna Willington, of Hurley-hall in Warwickshire,
died June 27th, 1694, aged 24. Elizabeth, daughter of
Samuel and Hannah Littlefear, died April 5th, 1725,
aged 7. William, son of Will, and Denis Wooton, died
Oct. 29th, 1686, aged 17. Elizabeth Nicholls, spinster,
died Aug. 20th, 1768, aged 59. William Nicholls died
Jan. 18th, 1763, aged 80. Thomas Rice died Aug.
14th, 1793, aged 47; Eleanor his wife, Sept. 15th,
1814, in her 72nd year. Alice, wife of Rich. Francis
Alexander Freeman, died April 11th, 1815, aged 29.
Joyce Flaisted, widow, 3rd daughter of Stanford Wol-
verstan, esq., of Statfold, died Oct. 11th, 1775, aged 54.
There are a few old tombstones mentioned by different
writers, which are now gone.
Lying within the communion rails.
Here lieth Sir Hvmfrey Ferrers, Knight, who married Anne, one
of the daughter! of Sir John Paddngton, of Hampton-LoYet, in the
Coontie of Worcester, knight ; by whom he had issue three daughters
and one son. His age was thirty and three years when he departed
this life ; and he was here interred on the second day of NoTember,
in the year of our Lord 1633.
804 TAMWORTH
A stone upright against the south wall of the Chancel.
Here Uetfa interred the bodv of Clemeot Fliher, late of WDneooii,
Gent. He married Ann, the daoghter of sir John SaTage senior
of Wilncooat, knt. His second wife was EUnbedi, the danghter
of Humphrey Arden, gent, of the family of Fkrfchall, in Warwick
shire. God grant na a joyfiil resurrection. He dyed Sept the
8th, 1689, aged 77.
In the Chantry-chapel^ the flat stone of William
Repington^ esq.^ of Amington, and Juliana his wife.
He died on the SOth of January, m d xzxxiii. ''Cujus
anime propidetur Deus."
On another flat stone, with Bepington arms.
HERE LIETH THE BODY OF SEBRIGHT RE-
PINGTON, ESQ., LATE OF AMINGTON. HE
DYED THE XVIII DAY OF SEPTEMBER,
1698, AGED 67 YEARS.
THE POOR RELIEV'D WERE AT HIS DOOR,
THE RICH WERE CHEARFUL MADE,
DEVOUT AND JUST HE WAS. WHAT MORE
OF MANKIND CAN BE SAID ?
Upon the north wall of the south Transept, aie
placed two tablets, on which are inscribed the names
of benefactors to the poor of the town and parish.
These, however, it is unimportant to give.
PARISH-REGISTER.
The Parish-register was oonmienced during the reign
of Philip and Mary, in 1556-7. Down to the year 1598,
the original records have not been preserved; but they
were copied by John Oldacres, curate, and William
Wightwick and Nicholas Vaughton, churchwardens.
The first eight pages contain baptisms alone. These are
entered in the subsequent part of the book, and date
only from the first year of queen Elizabeth. The copied
part is not complete. There are some omissions, chiefly
owing, it would seem, to deficiences in the old book.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 305
There is, however^ only one place where the void is
very considerable, — ^&om 1660 to 1563.
In these records, there are numerous valuable and
interesting entries, the principal of which we here give.
Marche, 1558, Baptized.
1 Will*m Stokes, j^ sone of John Stokes. [First entry.]
Anno dom' 1556, Marche.
4 where Christened[o ^^JHygg'es. [Earliest entry.]
October, 1576.
14 Was cr. Henry, sone of Mr. Cleme't Fysher.
29 was bur. Henry, sone of Mr. Cleme't Fysher.
January, 1576.
4 was bur. Bichard Degge, derke of y^ churche.
April, 1578.
14 wer M. Bichard Walker, cler., & Ellen Hunter.
November, 1578.
26 was cr. Lettjrs, d. of Mr. Cleme't Fysher.
Maye, 1579.
22 was bur. John Shemond, Ve'bi minister.
Januarye, 1582.
21 was bur. Edward Richardson, al's Harison, who was
slayn in y* market-place, y* 19*** day.
November, 1590.
15 was cr. Joice, d. of Roger Molde, preach'.
Julye, 1592.
14 was bur. Mr. Phillippe Repyngton, Gent.
September, 1592.
4 was bur. Thomas Wryght, y* clarke.
April, 1599.
mem' y* y« SO^ day of this Aprill, Robert, Earle of
Essex, went fro' Drayton Bassett towardes Ireland,
w^ an hoste of men, to make Warre againste y* Earle
of Tyroone, an Irishma'.
806 TAMWO&TH
July, 1599.
Mem' -f y* 19^ daie of July, was fSeumousIy solemnized
at Kinsbury y^ honorable bur. of y* old Lady Feiiers,
y* La. Willoughbie, mother of Mr. Edw. Devereux,
of castle-Bromwiche.
September, 1599.
28 The same day, y* noble Earle of Essex came out of
Ireland, w^ a motion of Peace.
September, 1606.
5 was bur. in a ditche William Tomlinson, papist.
November, 1609.
i was bur. Robert Michell, Clarke Church.
Septembe', 1612.
20 was bapt. James, sone of John Reade, preacher.
August, 161S.
IS was interred by night Thomas Orton, of Ami'gton,
recusant.
March, 1614.
7 The same night before, was interred Ellen Aucott,
recusant.
Memorand' that in the moneth of november, one
thousand six hundreth and sixteene. Was erected in
the Church-yard of Tamworth, by the apoyntment
of Mr. Martyn Fringe, a graue stone over the bodye
of Margrett Sponer, wyffe of Lawrence Sponer, of
Tamworth: shee being layd in p'sonall forme in
brass, with a bowle and a spoone in hyr hands, w^
this inscription in latine, 'Quisquis eris qui transi-
eris, Sta, perlege, plora,' recorded the sayd tyme
wittnesses.
Marche, 1618.
15 The 16**^ day, was buried Leister, y* sone of S' Row-
land Ridgley, Knight.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 307
ApriU, 16S0.
9 The ninth day^ was Bapt. Dorothe^ daught' of Mr.
lohn Packington^ esq^
August, 1623.
20 was interred Robert Freman, a Becusant.
March, 1624.
S was bur. Henry Baron, Sehoolemaster.
Aprill, 1681.
27 Mar. Thomas Blake, Minister of Tarn., & Jane Wag-
staff, of Drayton basset.
Nouember, 1635.
2 Bu. Thomas Euorite, slaine by a fall, poynting y*
steple.
Wordey, the sonne of S' Henry Griffithe, Baronet,
by Margaret his lady, borne the twentith day of
January, and baptizd the eight and twentith of the
same, anno 1636.
May, 1637.
19 In. Joseph, Sonn of widdow Deaine, who was
drowned in striuing for to fatch his hat, in y® Anquor.
ApriU, 1640.
25 Bur. Mr. Sarles, Gent, fro' Coton Hall.
From May, 1642, to June, 1644, the Register is blank,
except a few memoranda. From November, in the
latter year, it has been continued regularly.
May, 1642.
23 Desideratur hie catal(^us Baptizator', Marita-
tor', Sepultorumq', quor' noYa hoc non inscribantur
libro, propter incuria' Notarior' in sched'is apertis ea
reliquentiu'. sic iniquitate temporu' perierunt. ita
tester.
Theoph. Lord, Mr. in Art.
September, 1643.
About the b^inning of this moneth, Mr. Theoph.
906 TAMWO&TH
Lord was called to be the preacher at Tamworth,
both by the GoTemo' and Towne, but was forbad to
doe any seruise publikly, exepting preaching, as his
duty.
May, 1644.
About the latter end of this moneth of May, the
ho'ble Comittee of safety for the County of Warw.
at Coventrey sitting, desired Mr. Theoph. Lord, then
preacher, to supply the whole duty of the min'r in
Tamworth, — the former man that chall'nged the place
to be his, goeing away about i months before, and
never aquanting the Towne with his intention, for
some .... time there was not any 1644.
June, 1644.
In hoc mense, Incepit Mr. Theoph. Lord offida
publica p'agere; sed libro a clerico p'ochiali sibi
negate, defectus nimiu' admiss' ; sed noTa
quotquot hie fideliter inseruntur.
The entries following are evidently written from me-
mory or imperfect notes; for sometimes the date and
sometimes the Christian name is omitted.
November, 1644.
At the beginning of this month, I tooke the booke
into my owne hand; and here you haue not one
name missing of such that were at Tamw' either
Baptizd, buried, or married. This averrs,
Theoph. Lord, minister.
December, 1644.
19 buried the body of Will^ White, a souldier vnder
Captaine Tho. Layfield: he was slayn in the field.
March, 1644.
24 Cast into the ground, the body of Ellen wife of
Rich*^ Ensor, a popeling.
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 309
December^ 1645.
S buried the body of Jonathan Toone^ a souldier vnder
captaine Flower: he was slaine in the field ag^ y^
enemy.
March, 1645.
21 buried the body of Richard Vaughton, of Comber-
ford: he was slain by the enemie at Lichfield, in
fighting in y* wone.
June, 1646.
14 baptizd BobS son of Bobert and Mary Brabin, of Tarn.
Bob^ the father was cruelly murdered by the enemye
in Litchfield Close, after he was taken vpon the
enemy's Sally.
19 buried the body of Henry, son of Tho. Piccard, of
Cumb., an infant: his fistther Thom. was shiine by
the enemy in Lichfield Close, about March last ij
day.
89 buried the body of Bichard Harding, of Tamworth :
he was once one of the company, but was put out
bee. he was an Ale-seller.
August, 1646.
25 buried the body of Thomas Paget, a souldier vnder
Capt. Bowes: he was slaine.
January, 1650.
15 Buried the Body of Mr. Theophilus Lord, Minister.
July, 1651.
24 William Bock, minister of the Gk>8peU, and Mary
Boyes were married.
June, 1657.
11 was buried our rererend Pastor, Mr. Thomas Blake,
minister of Tamworth.
January, 1663.
1 baptized William, the Son of 8^ William Boothbey,
s s
310 TAMWORTH
Knight and baroni^ and Dame Hills bis wife, of
Tamworth.
November, 1665.
14 Maryed Robert Beppington & Margery Crispe.
October, 1666.
1 Married Mr. George Antrobus & Mrs. Sarah Bnrgesse.
August, 1672.
1 Buryed Elizabeth, the wife of Thomas Sylvester of
Bolehall street, together with foure male infants of
hers borne before their time.
September, 1676.
3 buried Frances downe, of Tamworth, Clark of the
Church.
May, 1677.
12 Married Symon Biddulph & Dorothy Beppington.
ApriU, 1678.
4 Buryed Mrs. Katherine Adderley, of Tamworth.
July, 1679.
27 Buryed Mary, the wife of Ralph Adderly, of Tamw**^,
Esq^
April, 1685.
22 Buryed Mr. John Allen, Towne-Clerk of Tamworth.
September, 1689.
10 buryed Mr. Clement Fisher, of Wilnecoate.
January, 1693.
23 Buried Mr. Samuel Langley, of Bolehall, and Minis-
ter of the Gospell at Tamworth.
July, 1708.
26 Bur. Mr. George Antrobus, schoolemaster of Tam-
worth, whose memory ought to be perpetuated to
Eternity.
October, 1710.
16 bur. Mr. Samuel Collins, Minister of Tamworth.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 811
July, 1724.
16 Bur. Mr. Nicholas Parker, Town Clerk of Tamworth.
August^ 1724.
4 Bur. Mr. George Antrobus, Minister of Tamworth.
December, 1724.
10 About this time, began y« Small Pox in Tamworth.
April, 17S0.
24 Bur. Dr. Sam^ Shaw, Schoolmaster of Tamworth.
May, 1781.
9 bur. Robert Grarret, late parish Clark here.
March, 1786-7.
10 Bur. y« EeV* Mr. Thomas Worthington, a non-jurer
of Tam.
March, 1741.
13 Bur. Beilby Laycock, Town Clerk of Tam.
July, 1742.
11 Bur. Jonathan Kendall, parish Clerk of Tam.
CHURCH-YARD.
Attached to the Church is a large Cemetary, in the
south part of which the edifice stands. Originally, it
was not so extensive as it is at the present time; for,
from time to time, parts have been added to it, as cir-
cumstances have required.
A piece of ground on the north-east side, was given
by Mrs. Grrace Wolverston, of Statfold ; and the dona-
tion was afterwards confirmed by Edward Eggerton, esq.,
of Harlaston, in Staffordshire. On the 24th of July,
1780, it was consecrated by the right rev. Edward
Chandler, bishop of the diocese. In 1797, a considerable
addition was made upon the north-west, and consecrated,
on the 28th of July, by the bishop, — ^the hon. James
S12 TAMWOBTH
Cornwallis. For this enlargement, the earl of Leicester,
and Robert Peel, esq., — the late sir Bobert»«*-«aeh pre-
sented two houses to the parish. And a Uttle meve than
fifteen years ago, a third piece was added on the west
side, and consecrated by bishop Ryder.
As in most other country-places, the Churdi«y«Kd was
anciently separated from the surrounding land by low
stone-walls, and was accessible by a lich-gate and stile.'
These, however, as the enlargements took place, were
removed, and gave place to quickset hedges, and walls
on the west. In 1797, the walls were first eteeted
along the north and east sides. The old south bound-
ary, facing the street, once consisted of a sleep bank,
with wooden rails and gates. In 1821^ the piesent stone
wall was built, with iron palisades and gates at either
end and in the middle. The path on the east side was
stopped in 1843, with the entrance into the Chuxeh-yard
by New College-lane.
The Church-yard presents nothing worthy of notice.
It is not even remarkable for its arrangement and
neatness. The cross has long disappeared, in iconoclas-
tic times; and none of the ancient tombstones have
survived to our days. The mtgority of the grave-stones
date from the middle of the past century: exceedingly
few are so old as the seventeenth. The only stone,
which would attract the eye of a stranger, is the
obelisk, which was erected by public subscription to
commemorate the unfortunate deaths of six females, in
a fire at the Castle Inn, during the autumn of 1838.'
It stands in the north-west comer, by the path, and
within the piece of ground last added to the Cemetary.
1 Court-rolls,
a This melAncholy accident oocurred on the 2nd of Noyember, aboot four o'clock
in the morning. The fire originated acddcntly, and was conflned pitacipailir to tiM
CASTLE AND TOWN. SIS
DEANERY.
Between the east side of the Chnrch-yaTd and Gtm-
gate^ are situated the ruins of the ancient residence of
the deans. They are now Tery scanty, consisting only of
two long parallel walls. These are built of rag-stone,
with tiles very frequently inserted. In the north
wall, there are some traces of a window ; and, at the
end towards the Church, part of a fire-place, and of a
chimney stands. The chinmey, notwithstanding its long
exposure to the weather, is still blackened with soot.
In Shaw's time, a wall on the west connected these two
together: it was removed when the brick wall was
built. Shaw, however, has fortunately preserved a
drawing of it* There were two semicircular arches in
btf and roomB B^Sacent. It brcike oat wben an Ihe faunates were aaleep. Hie six
maid-aarrantBileptatthetopoftbeboiiM I all the others escaped. As the staircase
had become faiacoessihle, attempts weremade to rescue the serranis bj a ladder, placed
at thelrwiiulow} bat notiiing could be seen or beard of them. Unfortanatelj a report
was spread, that thej were safe in a neiffhboniinff boose. The mistske was dis-
covered when the iln was nearly sobdoed. A policeman entered their room, and
foond fire iTlnff on the floor qnita dead. The Are had not reached them) bat the heat
and smoke had been intense. Indeed, as a witness observed at the faiqaeet, they had
been literally "baked to death." They were probably dead before their rescue was
sitcmpled, perhaps before assistance airiyed to suppress the Are. They had endea-
voured to escape, fortheir door was found open } but they had evidently been driven
back. The bar-mald, too, wlio slept in a sepsrate room, had tried to make her escape.
Her body was found upon the landing of the stain. She also had been suffocated.
The names of the poor suflbren were, llary Ann Smith, bar-maid) Harriet Bonner,
cook) Mary Gardiner, kitchen-maid) Mary Aim Booth, waiter) Harriet Buswell,
chambermaid) and Mary Chatterton, kitchen-maid. One had come to hersitoation on
the preceeding day, and another was to have left on the suoceedtaig morning. At the
inquest the verdict of ''Accidental death " was given.
This awfol catastrophe created great sensation in the town and surrounding country.
Five of the unfortunate females were interred, on the 0th, in one large common grave
in this Churdi-yard : the body of Mary Ann Smith was removed by her friends. Hie
ftmeral procession was very long and solemn. Thirty females arrayed in white bore
the flve cofllns. The dergy, the coroner's Jury, the parish-aathorities, and numerous
gentlemen of the town, followed. Afterwards a subscription was raised, and the
flBOttumcnt bunt, as a perpetual memorial of this melandioly accident As this stone
is the only memorial of the accident, we may correct an error in the date which it
bears. It is there said that the occurrence took place during the night of the and of
November. It ought to have been the morning of the Snd, as the fire happened after
midnight of the 1st of the month.
1 This writer erroneously calls them the ruins of the nunnery. It has been asserted
that the Church was erected on the site of the Anglo-Saxon Convent. This statement
is not substantiated by any ancient authority) and we have great reason to discredit it*
314 TAlffWORTH
it It is evident firom these, and from the existing re-
mains, that the Deanery was built in the Anglo-Saxon
style of architecture, and must probably haye been
erected before the Norman invasion.
Between the two walls, there is at present a garden.
Formerly a deep cellar existed here. But, some years
ago, in consequence of the vaulted roo& haying begun
to sink, they were completely filled up with soiL The
ruins of the Deanery are now only used to give support
to sties, outbuildings, and sheds. But, perchance, as
they attract the antiquary's eye, they serve to bring
to his mind the pleasing recollection of ages long past
by, too fidr and good to be for ever flown.
THE CONVENT.
In the time of the Anglo-Saxons, during the reign of
Ethelred II., there was a religious house in Tamworth.
Wulfric or Al£ric Spot, a chief councillor of state, and
nearly related to the king, in his will, made a bequest
to it, in common with the monks of Burton-upon-Trent;
of whose monastery he was the founder. The words of
his win are these: — ^*'Item, do Conventui in Tamwur-
thin fimdum ilium apud Langandtme, (Longdon co.
Stafford) sicut ipsi (monachi) ilium mihi ante hoc loca-
runt, et habeant ipsi usum fructiim (ejus) dimidium, et
dimidium monachi Byrtonensis, cum in cibariis, tum in
hominibus, tum in pecudibus, tum in rebus omnibus."^
Wulfiric Spot died in the year 1010.'
But concerning this Convent, particularly as to the
time at which it was erected, and the person by whom
it was founded, there exists great diversity of opinion.
Dugdale states his ignorance whether it belonged to
monks or nuns.' All other great authorities are agreed
that it was a house of religious ladies, founded by the
Bsiat Editha, in honour of whom the present Church
was dedicated.
But another difficulty is here presented. There are
three females named Editha, all members of the Anglo-
Saxon royal fiunily, whose connection with Tamworth
has been asserted by different writers. These are the
daughters of Ecgberht the Great, of Eadweard the
1 Doffdale's Mod. Anf L a SbAw's Staflbntoh. 3 Dafdale't Warwicksh.
316 TAM WORTH
Elder^ and of Edgar. To the latter^ the foundation has
been attributed by Leland/ Camden/ and Speed.' It is
remarkable, however, that both Leland and Speed, in
other works, vary in their statements, and mention the
daughter of Eadweard as the foundress. Tanner discredits
their assertions respecting the daughter of Edgar, because
there is " no mention of this in any old historian, nor in
the l^^ends of that St Edith, nor in the traditionary
account of the foundation of Polesworth : and if" he adds,
''there was any St. Edith that bore relation to this place
— ^Tamworth, — ^it must be she that was daughter to K.
Egbert and sister to K. Ethelwulph."^ But it is evident,
that the very same reasoning applied by Tanner against
Leland, Camden, and Speed, may be directed against
himself. History and tradition are both silent concern-
ing the daughter of Ecgberht in reference to Tamworth.
On the contrary, it is clearly evident that she never
had anything to do with the town.
John and Henry W. Roby, in the first and only part
of their " History of Tamworth " which was published,
have given reasons supported by the authority of some
ancient writers, to prove that Editha, daughter of Ead-
weard the Elder, was the foundress of the Convent of
Tamworth. We quote their own words.
'' The marriage of Sithrick, the Anglo-Danish King
of Northumbria, with a sister of Athelstan (consequently
a grand-daughter of Alfred, a daughter of Edward I., a
niece of Ethelfleda, and sister of Edmund I. and Edred,
and an aunt of Edwy and Edgar,) is recorded by almost
every monkish historian who treats of that period, as
Florence of Worcester, William of Malmsbury, John
1 CoUflctTOl.l,p.ai. a Britaimta. s Catakvae of rdigioai hoaset.
4 Notitte MohmUou
CASTLE AND TOWN. 817
Brompton, &c. The name of the bride is generaUy
omitted, but Matthew of Westminster calls her Eadgi-
tha; which name kter authors have generally softened
to Editha, under which appellation she is noticed by
Folydore Vergil. The scene of the bridal is stated in
the Saxon Chronicle (noticed by Turner as the only
history he has met with which particularizes the place,)
to have been at Tamworth. Now it is perfectly conge-
nial with the sjorit and feelings of those times for this
Editha, after her divorce, to have selected the place
where her earlier vows were given to an earthly hus-
band, to dedicate her later vows to heaven. She probably
considered this town as peculiarly marked out for her
retirement from the world, as it had witnessed the two
greatest misfortunes of her Ufe, the death of her excel-
lent aunt Ethelfleda, and the marriage of herself with
the brutal and irreligious Sithric. But it is not on mere
probability that her return to Tamworth, and her religious
profession in this town, rest. In the life of St. Edith,
the daughter of Edgar (which Edith, by the concurrent
testimony of all the old historians was a nun at Wilton,
and certainly appears not to have had the slightest
connection with Tamworth,) written by an uncertain
author, preserved in Leland's Collectanea, mention is
made of ''Eadgitha, Edgari germina, abbas de Tame-
worth, in provinda Staffordensi." It will be remembered
that Sithric's widow was aunt to Edgar. Hugh White,
better known by his Latinized name of Hugo Candidus,
after mentioning the burial places of many saints, adds,
^'et in Thamwrthe sancta Edgitha."^ This can only
mean the daughter of Edward I. for the daughter of
Egbert was buried at Polesworth, and the daughter of
1 Hiitoria CoBDcAU Bvrgensto.
TT
318 TAMWORTH
Edgar at Wilton. Thomas Rudbome is most explicit
on the point; he says, ''Genuit etiam iste Edwardus
Senior ex Egwinna filiam nomine Edgytham quae nupeit
Sirichro Comiti Northanhumbrorum, quse et requiesdt
apud Tanwitham, et pro sancta colitur."^ Lambarde*
gives implicit credence to the testimony of Rudbome,
and states her residence and burial at Tamworth^ on
his authority. Even Speed himself tells us, that Editha,
daughter of Edward I. after the decease of Sithric^e,
the Danish King of Northumberland^ *^ obtained of her
brother's gift the castle of Tamworth, in the countie of
Warwicke, where she began a monastery of nunnes,
and therein lived, died, and was interred, and both the
monastery and body afterwards was removed from thence
to Pollesworth.'" If then, from his own history, the
nunnery of Tamworth was foimded in the reign of
Athelstan, or one of his brothers. Speed's subsequent
statement, in the Catalogue of Religious Houses, that it
was foimded by Editha, daughter of Edgar, was most
probably copied, without consideration, from Leland or
Camden. Baker, though of no great value as an
authority, may yet be quoted as confirming our opinion.
He says of the daughters of Edward Senior, '' the eldest
was married to Sithricke, the Danish King of North-
umberland, and he deceasing, she entered into a
monastery which she began at Tamwor^ in Warwick-
shire, and there died."^ It must not be concealed that
Matthew of Westminster asserts that the widow of
Sithric, "virginitate sibi reservata," retired, not to
Tamworth but to Polesworth (Pollesberia.)' The subse-
quent removal of her body to that monastery, together
1 Ilift If^jor BcdctlK Wlntonlmrii. 9 IMctioiiaiiiun Anglte TbpogimphkuM
s Hist, or QntA Britsln. 4 Chronicle of tlN Kinn of 1
CASTLB AND TOWN. S19
with the confusion of the same name in two saints
venerated there^ may reasonably account for a mistake.
The correct appropriation of these three royal and
sainted recluses seems to be^
Editha, daughter of Egbert^ sister of Ethdwulf^ and
aunt of Alfired^ was Abbess of Polesworth.
Editha^ daughter of Edward I.^ sister of Athelstan^
and aunt of Edgar^ was Abbess of Tamworth.
Editha, daughter of Edgar^ sister of Edward II., and
aunt of Edmund II., was a Nun of Wilton.
They all died, and were buried in their respective
towns.
We can add little to the authorities quoted in con-
firmation of the opinions that Editha, daughter of
Eadweard, was the foundress of the Convent at
Tamworth, and that afterwards she was canonized.
Rudbome's evidence upon this point seems conclusive.
It is sufficient to say, that no author, to whom we have
had access, directly denies these statements, or gives
others that would invalidate them, except those whom
we have mentioned. It is true that this Editha is not
at the present time named in the calendar; nor is she
mentioned in the extensive ''Acta Sanctorum" of the
BoUandists, or in the more recent "Lives of the Saints",
by the rev. Alban Butler. Numerous of the Anglo-
Saxon saints were canonized, not by the pope, but by
the local bishops. Hence many attained a very limited
reputation; and after the English was separated from
the Roman church, their invocation became frequently
disused.
The assertion of Matthew of Westminster deserves
notice, for Editha of Tamworth is named in local records
as a virgin saint. He states that the marriage of Editha
320 TAMWORTH
to Sihtric was only nominal. In those times, such was
not uncommonly the case. Seyeral well known and
illustrious examples might be cited: and this was
more likely to occur when the political conversion of
the chief party was more than suspicious.
The confusion of the three saints seems principally
to have originated with Leland. He certainly fiell into
error in attributing the foundation of the nunnery at
Polesworth to Robert de Marmyon; which shows he
had no exact information on this point. Camden and
Speed evidently followed him. The festival of Editha,
daughter of Edgar, was kept annually in September;
whilst that of the Editha of Tamworth v^as observed
in the month of July. We may safely conclude they
were not the same persons.
The Convent did not remain very long at Tarn-
worth. Soon after the Conquest, it was incorporated
with the nimnery of Polesworth. The cause of die
removal is easily understood, if the assertion of Speed
be correct, that the brother of Editha bestowed the Castle
upon her, which she converted into her dwelling. Robert
de Marmyon must have displaced the nuns, to take
possession of his newly acquired domains. But if an
inaccuracy in Speed's statement should exist, we
may still suppose that they were expelled, when tlus
nobleman drove those of Polesworth firom his lands;
and that, when he restored them, he incorporated both
societies together. Perhaps he may have built the
Church, in recompense for the injury which the nuns
of Tamworth had received at his hands.
THE CHAPELS.
There are seyeral Chapels in Tamworth unconnected
with the church of England. The first which demands
our notice is the
ROBfAN CATHOLIC CHAPEL.
Before the erection of this building, the Catholics
had a mission established in the neighbourhood, at
Coton. There mass was celebrated weekly in a humble
cottage. In 1828, the Chapel was commenced, and
completed in the following year ; when it was opened,
on the feast of St. John the Baptist, — in honour of
whom it is dedicated, — ^by the right rey. Dr. Thomas
Walsh, bishop of Cambysopolis, who presides over the
Central district of England.
The Chapel is a neat and tolerably large structure.
It has no pretension to architectural merit, as it is
in the Egyptian style. Adjoining it, is a commodious
house for the residence of the priest The erection of
the whole cost 2200/.
Internally the Chapel is very plain. The painting
oyer the altar is fine ; and was presented by the right
hon. the earl of Shrewsbury. It represents our Lord
healing the infirm man at the pool of Bethesda. It was
painted by one of the Bolognese school, and was formerly
in the collection of Luden Buonaparte. It was purchased
by the noble donor at Rome.
S22 TAMWOBTH
Attached to this foundation is a school; and very
recently a burial-ground has been consecrated. The
Chapel was registered on the Ist of November, 1837,
as a licensed place for the celebration of marriages.
The rey. James Kelly has continued pastor from
the erection of the building to the present time.
UNITARIAN CHAPEL.
The Unitarians erected a yery neat Chapel, several
years ago. It was formerly rather obscurely situated,
being placed on the east side of Colehill, and at
some distance from the street. But since the formation
of Victoria-road, it has been brought much more into
public sight.
The architecture of this Chapel is very unpretending ;
it is built of brick. There is a school attached to it
The rev. W. Parkinson is the present minister.
BAPTISTS', METHODISTS', INDEPENDENTS',
AND FRIENDS' MEETING-HOUSES.
The Meeting-house of the Baptists, a small plain
building, was erected about forty years ago. It is
situated at the bottom of Peel-street. That of the
Methodists, in Bolebridge-street, was erected in 1816;
and the one belonging to the Independents, in Alder-
gate-street, in 1827. The Friends' Meeting-house stands
in lichfield-street. The existence of these institutions
is all we can note.
THE CASTLE.
HISTORY.
The information which we possess concerning the
Castle of Tamworth during the time that England was
held hy the Anglo-Saxons^ is very scanty. Its erection
by Ethelfleeda^ — ^its capture by Anlaf^ — ^and its conjec-
tured conversion into a Convent^ — ^are the only points
which are known concerning it. These matters have
been spoken of^ in other parts of our history.
When the kingdom fell into the hands of William,
duke of Normandy , after the battle of Hastings, in 1066,
he bestowed this stronghold with lands in the neigh-
bourhood, amongst which were the town and lordship
of Polesworth with Waverton or Wareton and StipershiU,
upon Robert de Marmyon, lord of Fontenay, in
Normandy, a baron of great valour and fame. The
king also gave this distinguished follower of his fortunes
the manor of Scrivelsby and numerous possessions in
Lincolnshire.
It is true that no record of the grant has hitherto
been found, and that the immediate proof is only
based upon a faulty legend. Indeed, there are some
circtmistances which seein actually to isryalidate the
£Etct. In the Battle-abbey roll, professing to contain a
list of those who came into England with the Norman
adventurer, the name of the first Marmyon is stated to
have been Roger, and not Robert ; and other documents
S24 TAMWORTH
contain the same assertion. The Doomsday is silent
as to the grants and the name of Maimyon is unknown
in it And we have positive evidence that, previously
to the time of Stephen^ the Castle was held by Robert
Dispenoer.
These may appear to be very formidable objections;
but a little consideration will remove them. Very slight
doubt can be entertained^ that Robert de Marmyon was
the same person as Rodbert or Robert Dispenoer or
Dispensator^ brother of the noted Urso d* AUtot Those
who are at all acquainted with ancient history, are
awaxe of the frequent changes which were made in the
names of persons from circumstances associated with
them. An individual might alter his surname, when
he removed his residence, or was appointed to any
particular office* The name, Despencer, merely gignifigg
that the person was the king's steward, — an honourable
post which Marmyon must have held. Thence he
would derive his common designation, in conformity
with the general practice of his times. This conjec-
ture is capable of being fully confirmed. The inmiediate
successor of Robert Dispensator is nowhere recorded;
and the estates named in Doomsday as belonging to
him were aU, at least so far as they can be traced, in
the tenure of the Marmyon fiunily, at a little later
period. His possessions are enumerated as lying at
four places in Warwickshire ; at fifteen, in Lincolnshire;
at seventeen, in Leicestershire; and at one place, in
Gloucestershire. Those in the county of Warwick,
were at Marston, Filingelei or Fillongley, Leth or Lea,
and Bertanestone or Barston. Finally, we have direct
evidence that the Castle was held both by Robert de
Marmyon and Robert Dispensator; therefore the only
CASTLE AND TOWN. 826
legitimate conclusion^ which can be drawn^ is that they
were the same.
Nor can we be surprised at the silence of Doomsday
respecting the Castle. Polesworth is also omitted. In
fact^ the minor possessions of Robert Dispensator seem
alone to be noticed. This only strengthens our opinion
that the Castle had been previously granted by the
king^ and the service fixed^ so that the commissioners
left it imnoticed.*
We find; indeed; amongst some old documents^ and
particularly in the Battle-abbey roll; that the name of
the first Marmyon is not written Robert but R(^r.
The authenticity of this celebrated roll is so small; and
it contains so many errorS; discovered by comparing
the various copieS; that no reliance can be placed upon
it. It is generally agreed that a much more accurate
list of the followers of duke William might be collected
out of the Doomsday-book.' From the roll; other
records probably derived the mistake. Besides; there
1 See page 59.
9 AniUoftntloncrftfaedUnerenceslnthecoiriesof thiiroU, nutynotbennlntex^^
log. Fuller, In his ** Chorcli-history of Britain/' has gilven seven lists, taken from the
works of Holtnshed, Stow, Fox, and John Brompton, and an eightti, containing tb»
names of persons who, after the battle of Hastings, were advanced to seigniorities in
the land. T6 compare these together we select six names, chosen merely for their
eminence, and on aocoont of them all being mentioned in Doomsday (except the last,)—
Nigel de AlUny, Henry de Ferrers, Hagh de Orentemaisnil, Urso de Abitot, Robert
Dispensator, and Robert de Bfarmyon. We shall find many diversities, omissions, and
repetitiofis*
1 Albcny. FinreroBB. Dabitot. Dlspencere. MarmUon.
9 Albeny Dispencer. Bfarmiloa.
t Henry, seignenrLe sire de Roger Marmion.
deFerieres. Grantmesnil. LesiredeFOntenay.
4 Henry, seig. de Le seig. de Leseig.de Le seig.de Fontnay.
Ferrers. Orosmenil. Ivetot. Roger Marmion.
5 Henry,sirede Rogier Marmion.
Ferrers. Le sire Fontenay.
6 Ferrer. Despenser
Feieis.
7 Ferecs. Spenser. Marmyoon.
• H. Ferret. H.deAppe* H.deSpen
R. de Ferrers. . tot. cer.
U U
TAMWORTH
were in Normandy so many as nine commnnes of
the name of Marmyon ; with one of whom Robert might
easily have been confounded by historians.^
In conformity with the feudal system, Robert de
Marmyon and his heirs had tenure of their lands by
military or other serrices. The Castle of Tamworth
Puller, whoM chief ezcdlence as a writer lies In bis wUty icnutfts, says fhat a
eatslogne ftom Daonsdaf weie to te beUered oa Itswwrd, bcfcM Battte-ffoQ on it»
oath. He comiiares the latter to Jason's weather-beaten ship so often patched with
new boards that it was qoestionabls whether It were the saase with the flrsL
» Oor readers wttltfi once pcaeelTe that we have been d&seosslnf one or tiie qnea.
tioBs raised brT. C. Banks, in his " History of the andent noble ftmUy of Marmyun,**
published In 1817: and perhapaChey nay expect as to follow him thsoochaH the pointSr
in which he has endeavonred to InTalldate sir WlUlam I>n(dale*s aoeoont of the earty
Norman lords of Tsmworth-Castle.
Bat in reality we haye at once destroyed ail his oldeetieas by s isi ii ting, and we trast
provinff, that Robert de Marmyon was steward to Wnilam I., and therefbte called Dis.
pencer. This, Indeed, he seems to consider as possibly tnie. Onecr two points may
be especially referred to. The Ihetthat Miliscent, wife of the first Robert de Marmyon,
was associated with her husband in some pious donnUons, does not indicate that
he acquired the lands by her, and thus fisTOur the coiUectnre that she was the dangh.
ter of Dispenoer. The second RcAert de Marmyon, and his wills Maad, gnve to the
monks of Fontenay lands which he possessed In M* own right. Nor can the
Marmyons have acquired the Ctetle of Tsmworth by this Mand; because to her
hnsbaad was granted fkee- warren In all his land in Warwickshire, as his fhther had
before him, and by name at Tamworth. nis at ones shows ttiat the flrst Marmyon
had possession of notable lands at this town.
In thus summarily relating the work of so eminent a writer, we must ivpndlaAe the
charge of presumption on our part. We deny all intention to misrepresent any teeti
wilfully, to suppress any poiirts which would militate against our oplnkm or in any
way give a flctltioos honour to our native town. We have not made use of mere
coqjectures, but have given our dear oonrictions derived from all the records which
have fallen under our notice. There has long been a contest between Tsmworth and
Scrivelsby regarding the questions, which was the 'caput baronls' and to which
was attached the Championship of England. In 1814, Banks was engaged in mam-
talning, before the House of Lords, the dami of his schod.fdlow and intimate friend,
Louis Dymoke, esq., to the barony of Marmyon, by seizure of the manor of Scitveisby.
He was, therefore, interested in the degradation of Tamworth-Castle. In his 'History*
he has thrown down the gauntlet, and we have daredto take it up. Tlie public must
be the umpire, and award the palm of victory.
Of course, we can only give a one-sided view of the question. We have not seen
the records of Scrirelsby themselveSf^the great distance of the place and other dr-
cnmstanoes rendering such a course impractleable. We do not wish uiOostly to
elevate Tsmworth at the expense of Scrivelsby } therefore we maintain that both were
granted to Marmyon at the same time, and conjointly formed the * caput barooiK.*
Such honours do we assign to Tamworth-Castle i and this seems the fsirest oondnsMn
to which we can arrive. Banks considers the * ctfiat baronias * and the Championship
to be inseparable. This we do not dispute. We trust that, before the conchuion of
our account of the Castle, we shall have proved that. If baronies by tenure were now
admitted, the present owner of the Castle of Tsmworth would be a baron of the realms,
and ought, in strict right, to exercise the office of Royal Champion of England alter-
nately with the Dymokea.
CASTIiB AND TOWN. 327
and the manor of Scrivekby conjointly were held by
Boyal Championship^ — one of the most noble and
distinguished offices in the kingdom. The lord of
these places, or some person in his name if he should
be preyented by any just cause, was, at the time of
the king's coronation, to ride completely armed and
sitting on a barbed horse into the royal presence;
and there, causing to be proclaimed that he would
defend the right of the king and the dignity of the
crown, challenge to mortal combat any person who
should dare to offer opposition. This honourable office
the Maimyons are said to have possessed hereditarily
in Normandy, and to have performed at the crowning
of the dukes.^
Kobert de Maimyon, having thus acquired the Castle
of TamT(^orth, with its demesnes, most probably con-
verted it into one of his principal residences.' For this
purpose, he may have removed from it the society of
nuns, who are said to have occupied it' According
to the ancient legend, of which we spoke as containing
the only direct proof of the grant of the Castle^by the
Conqueror, he was not content with the territories
which he had acquired, but seized upon the possessions
of other religious ladies. This is a poor authority
whereon to charge him with sacrilege, but we must
relate the tale as it is given.
Directly after his settlement here, Robert de Marmyon
expelled the nuns of Polesworth from their convent,
and, driving them from their lands, retained their
property. Being compelled to leave their peaceful
1 Cunden's Britannia.
9 Dngdale't Baronage has been oonsnlted in Uie text, and bit Antiqnitiet of War-
fvidubire, in the notes, oaless we bave giyen references to other authoritiet.
S See page S90.
S28 TAMWORTH
shelter, the holy Benedictine sisterhood took np their
abode in a small cell at Oldbury, a tew miles distant,
probably the only place that they slill held. There
they remained, hoping that the days of adversity might
soon pass by, and some providential incident restore
them to their former state. It accordingly so happened ;
for the cause which these weak Saxon females were
unable to uphold against a potent Norman baron, was
vindicated by extraordinary power.
Within the space of a twelve-month, continues ibe
legend, Robert de Marmyon made a very costly
entertainment at this Castle, to which he assembled
numerous noble iriends and guests. Amongst them,
was his sworn brother-in-arms, sir Walter de Somervile,
lord of Wichnor, in Staffordshire. Whilst Marmyon
was reclining on his bed, St. Editha, habited as a veiled
nim, and bearing a crosier in her hand, appeared to
him in a vision. She upbraided him for his sacri-
legious dispoliation, and announced to him that, unless
the abbey of Polesworth were restored to her successors,
he should eventually suffer an evil death, and go to
hell. And in order to make him more sensible of her
admonition, she smote him on the side with the point
of her pastoral staff; and then vanished. Being aroused
by the blow, he cried out so loudly that his friends in
the house heard him, and immediately hurried to his
chamber, to learn what had occurred. They found him
extremely tormented with the pain of his wound, and
the bed covered with blood. He related the circum-
stances of the vision to them. They advised him to
confess himself, and to make a solemn vow that he
would restore the nuns, and make full compensation to
them. After he had acted in accordance with their
CASTLE AND TOWN. 829
advice, his pain ceased^ and he recovered. In accomi*
plishment of his vow, he rode to Oldbury, accompanied
by his friends^ and sir Walter de Somervile. He asked
pardon of the nuns for the injury which he had done
to them ; and caused them to return to Polesworih. At
the same time, he begged that he and his sworn
brother-xn-arms might be reputed their patrons, and
have sepulture for themselves and their heirs at the
convent, — ^the Marmyons in the chapter-house, and the
Somerviles in the cloisters. Thus the nuns were re-
instated, and enjoyed their rights during the remainder
of the reign of William the Conqueror, and in the
times of his successors.^
There can be but one opinion concerning this legend.
In it has clearly been embodied, long after the
Conquest, a popular tradition containing as usual
great error foimded upon some truth. We will leave
the supernatural part of the narration alone, and dwell
only upon the historical statements. In these, vnll be
found some important mistakes. Walter de Somervile
was not then lord of Wichnor; for, according to the
Doomsday-book, it was held by Robert de Stafford.'
But it is certain that it soon passed to the Somerviles.
And again we have good grounds for asserting that one
of the main incidents could hardly have occurred in
the reign of the Conqueror. The fundamental truth of
the legend seems to be the deprivation and restoration
of the nuns. Their reinstitution cannot be questioned.
I Dofdaie's Monatt. Anfl. The place of Mpoltare of any of the Mannyon
family, we have not ascertained. The remains of the nunnery at Polesworth are very
scanty, and have been conrerted Into small dweUing.honses and ontbolldlnffs. It is
impoMible to discover the original destination of the parts. A large gate-way and a
scmlorciilar arched passage leading towards the church, the fragments of a staircase,
and the ashlar masonry at the anises of the walls, are almost all the partlcolars that
wooM attract attention. Not a single tomb is now to be seen amidst the mlns.
S 8haw*8 SCalltodsh.
330 TAMWOBTH
It expressly appears from the charter of Robert de
Marmyon^ that^ for their re-establishment at Polesworth,
he gave to Osanna, the prioress^ the church of St.
Editha in that place, in order that the convent of
Oldbury might remain there. The exact words are as
follows: — ^^'Notum sit omnibus me ooncessisse Osannse,
prioress®, ad religionem instaurandum Sanctimonialium
ibi, Ecclesiam S. Edithee de Pollesworda, cum pertinen-
tiis; ita quod Conventus de Aldeberia ibi sit manens."'
Robert de Marmyon and MiUsoent his wife also bestowed
on the sisterhood the whole town of Polesworth, with
all their demesnes in Waverton.' The grant was
afterwards confirmed by king Stephen. Hence Leland
has attributed to this baron and his lady the foundation
of that religious house. But the words of the charter,
which we have quoted, show that it was a previously
constituted community. It is generally believed to
have been instituted by Ecgberht the Great, for his
daughter Editha. She was afterwards canonized, with
her great instructress Modwen, who came with Lyne
and Osythe from Ireland.'
But we cannot date the restoration of the monastery
of Polesworth before the commencement of the reign of
Henry I. Our reason is very simple. Osanna was
prioress when Robert de Marmyon re-established the
nuns ; and, in the time of Stephen, she gave licence to
Elias le Sauvage to have a chapel at Pooley,^ Roger
de Clinton being then bishop of the diocese. This
1 Lelaiul's CoItoctauML
1 WATBKTOMWMgiTaitotfaeniuMlathetlmeofHeniyl.oirthcitaJboatt. Robert
de Marmyon enfeoilM Robert de Qrendon in certain lands in this Tillace, with Dobdon
adjacent, to be held by aenrice of one kniffht*s fiw. Theie placet were Ions lield by
the heln of Marmyon.
3 Daxdale*a Warwickah.
4 FooLiT, in the pariah of Poleaworth, waa granted to the Marmyona. The second
baron of the Aunily, about Stephen's time, oontered it on Bnidet, in fee4hnn, at an
CASTLE AND TOWN. 381
prelate was consecrated in 1129, and died in 1148. If
we assign the year 1084, — only four years before the
Conqueror's death, — as the date of the legendary
occurrence, and 1140^ as that of the licence, Osanna
must have been abbess for a period of more than fifty-
six years, and must have attained an extraordinary age.
Truly if this is not beyond the bounds of possibility, it
is certainly not within the limits of probability. Osanna
was also prioress when Walter de Hastings^ and Hade-
wise his wife, in the reign of Henry I., gave to the
nuns the site of Oldbury and all Stipershill,' in
fields and woods, down to the middle of the valley on
that side of Mancetter ; and a certain part of the wood
on the south-east of Oldbury, extending to the rivulet
which runs from Hartshill; and also two grounds
•nniud rent of ite. The latter Mon afterwards granted it to Saavage. Osanna, the
abbess of Polesworth, with the consent of her fellow nans, gave pennisslon to Elias»
son of GeoA«y 1e Sanvsge, to hare a du^el here, bat without serrlce,— for prayers
without nutfs we sappose,— snd a chapel-yard. In return he gare to the conrent, the
inheritance of four acres of the best meadow-ground in this Tillage; promised to pay
annually daring his life ISil. upon St. Editha's alter, on the day of her festiTal ; and
bequeath his body to be buried in the church of Folesworth. This agreement was
made in the presence of Roger de Qintan, the bishop.
But the tenure in fee-fisrm did not endure for a long time. Robert de Marmyon,
probably the son of him who made the grant to Burdet, in consideration of ten marks
and the yearly payment of a sore sparrow-hawk to himself and his heirs, released the
rent of lOs. unto Geofty, brother snd heir of Elias le SauYage. Subsequently William
Burdet acquitted to Philip, the last of the Mannyons of Tsmworth-Castle, all his ri^ht
to the homage and services of William le Sauvage, grandson of the second Geoflkvy,
for the lands of Fooley. Henceforward they were held immediately of the Mannyons,
by senrioe of a sore sparrow-hawk, or in Ueu S«. to be paid on the feast of St. James
the Apostle, in the nature of soccage-tenure.
1 At the time of the genersl surrey, Fillonolbt was held by the bishop of Coa-
tance, the church of Coventry, Alsi a Saxon, snd Robert Dispensator. Bach possessed
half a hide} snd fax the portion of the latter was the church, with wood two miles
long and one broad : valued altogether at 90s.
Of the portion possessed by the Mannyons, Walter de Hastings, was enfeoffBd, in
the time of Henry I. j and, at the end of that king's reign, it was held by his son Hugh.
Bis descendants continued possessed of it, by service paid to the lords of TAmworth.
CssUe : and there they most probably resided, until Henry de Hastings acquired, by
marriage, the castle of Abergavenny, in Wales. See pp. 07 ond 88.
1 SriPsasBiLi., near Folesworth, is said to have belonged to the Mannyons.
Osmden erroneously states that they had their castle here: there was once a little
fortlflcation. It continued for many ages fai the possession of the lords of Tam-
worth-Castie} who, from the reign of Edward III. at least, kept their courts there.
882 TAMWOBTH
called Calf-croft and Biicbley. Hub might seem another
evidence of the worthlessness of the legend in describing
Oldbury as belonging to the nuns in the Conqueror's
reign. But it appears from the declaration of Roger
de Clinton the bishop, who witnessed the deed, that
the grant was made, in order that Walter and Hadewise
might not retain any of the property belonging rightly
to the convent of Polesworth. This shows that the
nuns had previously possessed it. The great error in
the legend is the placing of the dispossession and
restoration of the nuns so close together in point
of time. If we date the latter circumstance about the
middle of the reign of Henry I., no difficulty can be
found in reconciling the other fiausts there given. In
some of the laws of this king, the preambles acknowledge
the manifold oppressions which religious bodies had
suffered : and afterwards restitutions were very generally
made.
Nothing more than what we have related is known
of the first Norman lord of the Castle, except that,
with Miliscent, he granted to the monks of Bardney, in
Lincolnshire, the adjacent town of Budegate, for the
health of the souls of his father and mother, his own
soul, that of his wife, and for the souls of their heirs.
He died in the time of Henry I.; and was succeeded
by his son, also named Robert.'
1 The fint Robert wm not improbebly the tether of Rofer de Maimyon, whom
DoKdale namei as being posiewed of Arrow.
From Roger, Arrow descended to Robert his gnndchild, who afterwards passed
it away to QtoBtej his onde. The daughter of the latter,— Albredat—oonTeycd It
to William de CamvUe i who afterwards became her husband. He was a younger
son of Richard de CamvUe, a ** devout and pioos man," who founded Combe-abbey
for Cistertian monks.
Lady Albreda purchased a mill at Stretton.soper>Dunsmore of these monks, for
twenty marks. She afterwards assigned it to them again, on condition that they
should solemnize the annirenaries of her husband, of herself, of William her son,
and of the rest of her sons and daughters. To William her son, she gave a fourth
CASTLE AND TOWN. 333
Henry I.^ like his predecessors, was ardently fond of
the chase. He increased the number of royal forests, and
framed laws of the severest nature to prevent encroach-
ments, and preserve the animals within them. Amongst
these regulations, there was one by which the barons
were forbidden to hunt, even upon their own lands,
without royal permission. Most of the nobles were,
therefore, compelled to obtain licence that they might
indulge in a sport, which formed one of their most
fiivourite amusements. Robert de Marmyon received
from the king a charter, dated at Cannock, in Stafford-
shire, by which free-warren was conceded to him in all
his lands in the county of Warwick, in woodland and
plain, as his father had before him, and by name here
at Tamworth.
This nobleman attained considerable note in the
struggles between the empress Maud and Stephen for
the crown of England. He was in Normandy when
Geoffirey, count of Anjou, Maud's husband, attempted
to gain that dukedom from the English king: and he
fought in the cause of the latter. The command of
Falaise was committed to him; and he bravely held it
out against all the vigorous attempts of Geofirey to
take it by storm. But in retaliation, the count besieged,
and at length gained, his strong castle of Fontenay,
and razed it completely to the ground. This occurred
in the year 1139.
part of a knifht'i fee in SecUncton, of the fee of Robert Bomu» earl of Leicester,
wluch the had acquired of her ftither; a&other fourth part, of the fee of the earl of
Warwick s and half a koif ht*s Cee there and in Weeton, which Simon de Barcheston
held. For these, her son gave her forty marks and discharged her of twenty, due to
the monks of Combe, for the performance of her husband's anniversary. Albreda
certainly held Dostltill j she granted the senrioe of James de la Launde for this place
to William her son.
wniiam de Ladington held part of a knight's fee tai WUneoote of lady Albreda de
MarmyoD, who held it of the earls of Mellent.
W W
SS4 TAMWORTH
After this occurrence, Robert de Marmyon granted
away his lands in Fontenay. With Maud de Beauchamp
his wife, he gave permission to his tenants by military
service there, to bestow the lands upon the monks of
that place. This was not his only donation, in the
course of his life, to ecclesiastical foundations* He
gave a hide of land in Widefleet, with the mill there,
to the monks of Bermondsey, in Southwalk: and he
bestowed the church of Quinton, in Gloucestershire, on
the nuns of Polesworth. After Stephen had been taken
prisoner, in February, 1140-1, Maud became queen
for a short time. Whilst at Oxford to celebrate the
approaching festival of Easter, she began to manifest
her haughty and vindictive spirit In spite of the
remonstrances of her most attached Mends, she un-
sparingly confiscated the property of those who had
been the partizans of Stephen, and bestowed them upon
her own adherents. Amongst other nobles, Robert de
Marmyon shared in her indignation. She seiased his
barony and possessions at this town; and granted the
Castle and honour of Tamworth to William de Beau-
champ, to hold as freely as they had ever been enjoyed
by Robert Dispencer, the brother of Urso d' Abitot.
Emeline, the daughter of Urso, was the mother of
William de Beauchamp. On this accoimt, it would
seem, he obtained the possessions of the son of his
grand-uncle, — ^the first Robert de Marmyon.
Whether William de Beauchamp actually enjoyed the
Castle of Tamworth, we do not know. At all events,
he can only have held it so long as Maud retained
power, whilst Stephen was a prisoner. Robert de
Marmyon did not live long after the liberation of the
king, which took place in September, 1141. William
CASTLE AND TOWN. SS5
de Newbury speaks of him in no very gentle terms.
He describes him as a quarrelsome person^ equalled by
few of his time in ferocity and knavery. Between this
noble and Balph, earl of Chester^^ a feudal war arose,
in the prosecution of which he lost his life.
Intent upon the destruction of this earl's house and
family, the fierce baron of Tamworth, in 114S, marched
with all his forces to Coventry, where his opponent's
Castle was situated. He seized upon the priory there,
and, driving out the monks, converted it into a fortress ;
from whence he might attack the castle. For greater
security, he caused numerous deep ditches to be secretly
dug in the adjacent fields. These were lightly covered
over with soil, so that if any one of the enemy should
approach he might be ensnared. As the earl's troops
rapidly drew near, Robert de Marmyon rode out to
reconnoitre them. But it so happened that, whilst
charging at the head of his own soldiers, he forgot
where the traps had been formed, and his own horse
fell into one of them. He was thrown down with great
violence, and his thigh broken. A common soldier
immediately rushed upon him, and cut off his head,
before any of his friends could hasten to his succour,
and rescue him.
Kobert de Marmyon had a son, also named Robert;
who succeeded, and became the third baron of the
family. He must have been very young at his father's
decease, as he survived him about seventy-five years.
This Robert de Marmyon, having obtained his father's
estates, had granted to him, by royal charter dated at
1 B«^, Mil of Chester, gnated to Robert de Mannron and hii liein, about
Stapben'a time, the eenrioe of Osbert de Arden rendered for the manor of Kimossubt.
But, aotwithetandhig, thla place was afterwards hdd of the earl of Chester's heirs,
as of the manor of ChUesmore in Coventry.
SS6 TAMWORTH
Bruges, free-warren in all his land in WarwidLshire,
and by name at Tamworth, in woodland and plain, as
his ancestors had in the time of Henry I. And no
one was to hunt in it, or to capture a hare, without
his licence, under penalty of 10/.' Upon the aasessment
of the aid, in 1166, to provide for the marriage of
Matilda, the king's eldest daughter, with Henry the
lion, duke of Saxony, Bavaria, Angaria, and Westphalia,
it was certified, according to the red book of die
Exchequer, that he held eleven knights' fees, whereof
his ancestors had been enfeoflfed in the time of Henry I. ;
and three, which he himself had acquired. Banks,
however, says that the black book gives a diferent
account, and sets forth that the knights' fees were eleven,
a fourth part, and a fifth part, de veteri feoffiimento;
and five, and a fourth part, de novo feoffiunento: of
which latter, Geoffrey de Marmyon held one. For these,
within two years, when the marriage took place, he
paid 7/, 12s. 8rf.»
1 Rot ptX., V H. VI., per Inspez.
3 We will here ipeek of the pceaeulont of the Mennxona at Otsk Wbitagkb aad
Frbaslbt, in Warwickahlre.
Id Doomsday, there is no distinction between Orer and Nether WMtacre. Tbey
were held by TorchU de Warwick, Hogh de Grentemaianil, and Robert de Ved.
The greatest part of these very soon came into the possession of the Itarmyons.
Of Orer Whitacre the fether of Simon de Whitaere wasenfeolIM, In the time of Henry
I., to hold by service of half a knight's fee. He also obtained the remainder from the
family of Arden, immediately descended firom Torchtt de Warwick. This Simon de
Whitacre, by mairlage with the sister and heiress of Robert de Kalli, aoqoiied Flneasiey.
This place was oiicinally a member of Folesworth, and belonged to the Marmyons,
who gave it to KaOi or his progenitor} as, in tiie rdgn of Henry II., Robert, the third
baron, designated him his knight, because he owed him military scrrice fSnr it : and he
confirmed the grant of Freaaley.mill, which KaOi had made to the nvns of Poiesworth.
Simon de Whitacre died in 1187» leaving Alan and Jordan his sons. To Alan,
succeeded his son Simon ; who, removing his residence to Bardlieston, assumed tiiat
as his surname. In isss, he passed Over Whitacre to Simon, son of Jordan and
Isolds his wife, to be held of hhn by service of half a knight*s fee. In li38, it was
agreed between the parties that Simon de Whitacre should perform the required
military service, by taking the office of warder at the Castle of nunworth. But Simon
de Barchestou and his heirs were to have ward, marriage, and relief, from Snnan de
Whitacre and his heirs, whenever required. And the latter were to pertorm aoit at
this Castle, for the former. Over-Whitacre and Freaaley, descended from Staaon to
CASTLE AND TOWN. 881
In the time of Henry 11., which was oompanitiyely
free from war, Robert de Mannyon was only distin*
gniflhed by the local dignities which he aoqpiixed. In
1185, he was made sheriff of Worcestershire. At this
time, he is mentioned as ^M*nas de Marmion, baxo de
Tamworth:''^ whence it is evident that he was a baron
by die tenuze of Tamwordi-Castle, whatever he might
be in right of Scrivelsby. He continued in that office
until nearly the close of 1188. In the year preceeding
this latter date, he was a justice-itinerant in Warwick-
shire and some other counties. And, in 1189, he was
again constituted sheriff of Worcestershire.
We do not know whether Robert de Marmyon
attended Richard I., during his splendid exploits in
Palestine. At least, we have not hitherto found him
mentioned as participating in the holy war. But, in
1194, after the liberation of the king from the hands
of Henry VI., emperor of Germany, he accompanied
Richard into Normandy ; who was determined to retaliate
upon Philip, the French king, the injuries received
from him by his favouring John, in fomenting discord
amongst the English subjects, during their monarch's
absence. The war continued for a long time. In 1197,
Robert de Marmyon was one of those eminent persons
who subscribed the confederation made between Richard
Jonlan htoscm** a man potent in the Ooontrie'*} and to Richard, Ml BOB. Thelatter,
ini«i, held then at the death af FhiUp de BfannroD. by Mrrtee of a kalKht«a Hm.
(Inqvia. 90 B. 1.) Bnt, on the death of Joan Mortein, eldeet danghter of PhiUp, he is
aaid to have held a lml(ht*s tat, and a iSoorth part, in theie plaoea, (Inqoia. 18 E. i.)
The great giand^anghtar of thia Btehard carried Whitacie and rreaalejr to Alan de
Waidhne i whoee two danghtaia and cohefafenee «cai?eyed them. tenp. Hen. VIL, to
theftanlllesor Horeand Walah. In 1S75, air Baldwin de Frevile died aemed of two
partaof akBii»ft>aiBefaiR«aele7*which Bichard de Whttacre, frand-eon of the laat
named Bkhard, held. AIm half a knlghfa fee in Whttacre, that Jordan de Whitam
once had (IwinlB. 4Q B. lU.) And, in 1887. anoClier air Baldwm de nwOe. at his
de■a^ w«i oeiaed of the thnrd part of a knisfaes fee in Freaaley. and half a kaigfat's
feelnWhttacR.'whichthahdnofBlcharddeWhltacreheid. (Inqnls. II R. 11.)
1 Brdeswicke:->edit. 1844.
388 TAMWOBTH
I. and Baldwin, count of Flanders, against the French
sovereign/ Richard died abroad in 1199.
Again we find nothing particular named of the third
Robert de Marmyon, for some years. But, in 1813,
the then aged warrior accompanied John in the expe-
dition made into Poiteau, to r^;ain the Engb'sh terntories
which had been seized by the French, on account of
the murder of Arthur, duke of Britanny, the claimant
to the British ihrone. But, for some reason, Robert de
Marmyon, after a short time, took oflfence, and joined
the French king. John was highly incensed at this
step. Out of revenge, in 1215, he commanded his
chamberlain, Thomas de Erdington, to hasten with
some forces to the Castle of Tamworth, and, taking out
of it all the prisoners, horses, aims, and ammunition, to
pull it down to the groimd.' Whether this order was
attempted to be executed, does not appear: at least
the edifice was not destroyed. John did not live many
months afterwards.
Robert de Marmyon was a bene&ctor to the church.
He gave to the knights-templars at Balsall, the mill
of Barston, in Warwickshire.' And, in 1175, lie con-
firmed to the nuns of Polesworth the church of
Quinton, which his father had bestowed upon them.
He died about 1217, leaving Robert his eldest son and
heir. By another wife, Philippa, he had two other
sons, one also named Robert, the other William. His
1 Rymer's FQedenu 9 Dncdite's WanHdnh..
3 At the genena mantj, Bamtov wbb held hr Robert de Olgi. Iqr « penoo neaed
Robert, end hr Robert Dispensetor. The portion of the latter wet ttiemoetezteiMlTc,
behig eathneted at ten hldee, indndinff a mill which paid ur. attogeOier Talued at
100*.
Tlic early hiitory of this place is imperfieetly known. It was partly giTen to tiie
knlfhts-teni^laTB and partly to the knights-hoepltaUos. In 1185, the templars had
lands here, amoontmc to the yearly Talue of u. 9d,, said to be of the fee of Robert de
Marmyon. The donor's name is not expressed.
CASTLE AHD TOWN. 889
widow survived him for some years; for, in 1S20,
Hemy de Armentiers and William de Gurli were joined
in commission, with other persons of quality in War-
wickshire, to be justices for taking an assize of novel
disseisin, which she had brought against Robert de
Marmyon the younger, concerning the dowery of such
lands, as her husband was seized of at his death, in
Tamworth and Middleton.^
Bobert de Marmyon, the elder son, took part with
Philip Augustus against king John, and was in France
when the latter died. On the death of his father,
Bobert de Marmyon the younger gave 500/. to the king
to have the custody of the Castle of Tamworth, and
the lands which his father had held at the time of his
death, until arrangements should be made that the
English might peaceably enjoy their estates in Normandy,
and the Normans, theirs in England. But if, before this
should take place, Bobert the elder should make his
peace with the king and receive the possessions of
his father, he should pay to his brother, Bobert the
1 Dofdate'tWanrickiUn.
In tlM Oonqoflror's time, Miooutov bcloii(ed toHvgfa de Grantemainia end Adelix
hie wife J tmt it eoaii ceae to tke Mttmfona. Peiliapa Ifdlioent wife of the lint
Robert, WB8 their daughter. In 1185, the tem^lere held lends there, which had been
bestowed npon fheni bjr QeuAejr de Mennjron*
In the femtly it conttnoed. IniS85, Fhilipdaimedby praacrlptSanecoort-leetand
gallowe there. These were sBowed. Bat to his demand for ftee-warren, the Jury
answered that the earls of Warwick had free chase, tahinc fuifeitiues for all oflbnces
done therein, and that he had no warren, except by grant from Sla, countess of
Warwid, dutaic the term of her life. Thereupon he was amerced for his nndne
On the death of FhUp de Marmyon, It was dirlded amongst his three coheiresses;
whooaiTeyedittottienrevllcs,BoleIers,and HlUarlee. Atthlstlme,itwascertataity
hdd of the churdi of TSmworth, by serrice of (it. M. amraally. How It was
aeqidred, we cennot say : this feet was mikaown to Dogdale. In 180S, the Freriles
aeqaired Hillary's part, by porchase. In 19Q0, sir Baldwin de nerile procured a
licence from Richard Scroope, bishop of Oorentry and Llchfleld, to hare an oratory
or private ctu^l In his manor-hoose there.
Bottler's part also came to the neriles) far Margaret, the youngest sister of the
test sir Baldwin, carxled it entire to her husband i and by her It passed into the femily
of wmonghby.
340 TAMWOBTH
younger, so much of the 600/. as the profits and
of the lands might ML short of that smn. Bobert the
younger was then to enjoy the lordships of Wintering^iam
and Coningsby, in Lincolnshire ; Quinton, in Gloucester-
shire ; and Berwick, in Sussex : and William, his junior
brother, was to have Torrington, in Lincolnshire, and
lands to the annual value of 10/. in Berwick. Of all
these, they had special grants from thor h&er.
And it was fiffther concluded, that Robert the
younger should give to the king good security that he
would keep this Castle for the royal use, and ddiver
it up whenever it should be required. He aooordii^y
found securities for the performance of these conditions,
— ^Nicholas de Verdon, Geoffirey de Camvile, William
de HaxdreshuU, Ralph Fiti Ralph, Thmnas de Offerton,
John de Culi, Richard Russell, Robert de la Lande,
Robert de Passi, William de Fou, and Matthew Char-
nels, all of whom were men of note in the a^aoent
country. These arrangements being completed, Robert
the younger had a special royal precept to William de
Harcourt, then governor for the king, to deliver up the
Castle to him.
Robert de Marmyon the elder did not immediately
quit the king of France. But it does not appear that
he aided Louis, in his attempts to gain the throne of
England, to which he had been invited by the turbulent
barons, when they were driven to seek a new sovereign,
by the unprincipled conduct of John. After the defeat
of the French and the conclusion of a treaty between
England and France, Robert de Marmyon made his
peace with Henry HI.; and, in 1S20, he received the
Castle of Tamworth, with the rest of his father's lands ;
as appears by the king's signification of his pleasure to
CASTI^ AMD TOWN. 341
all who held lands of it^ by military service or otherwise^
and to the sheriff of Warwickshire. Robert the younger^
therefore^ surrendered the possessions. His posterity
long flourished in the county of Lincoln.*
It is very probable that^ after the expiration of
several years, Robert de Marmyon returned into Nor-
mandy. For, in 1233, he assigned all his estates in
England, for the space of seven years, to the. care of
Peter de Rupibus, bishop of Winchester; with the
guardianship of Philip his son and heir, whose disposition
in marriage this prelate was to effect as he should
think proper, without disparagement. The bishop,
afterwards, with the consent of Robert and Philip,
made an assignment of the wardship to William de
Cantilupe, a great man of that time. Of Robert the
elder, we find nothing more recorded, except that he
died in 1241.
Philip de Marmyon succeeded to all his father's
estates. In 1243, he married Joan, one of the daughters
and coheiresses of Hugh de Killpeck, of Killpeck-castle,
in Herefordshire; whose guardianship and disposal in
marriage had been committed to William de Cantilupe.
For her lands, Philip paid relief in the following year,
and, doing homage to the king, had livery' of them.
In 1247, he paid a fine of six marks of silver to
1 Robert d« Mannyon, Jimlor, became lord of WlnterinKbam, in Lincolnshire.
He nanied a danghter of Jemefan Fits Hac:h, and had iaaae William ; whose son and
heir John was smnmoned to Parliament as a baron firom the 8th of Jane, 1S04, to the
Ufh of March, ISSI-S ; in which year he died. Hia son,. John, was summoned fh>m
the ard of December, 1S90, to the 1st of April, 133A. He had issue, Robert, who died
8. P., leavinir his two sisters his heirs,— Joan married to sir John Bemack, and Avice,
the second wife of John lord Grey, of Rotherford,— between whom the baiony fell
into abeyance. John, eldest son of Avice, assumed the name of Marmyon ; but he
died S. P. in 1385, leaThiR hia niece his heir.
WUUam, brother of Robert the younger, had a son William; who was summoned
to Parttamient on the 24th of December, 1904, but never afterwards j and he appears
to hare had no Issue. Nickolaa*a Peerage.
8 From the Norman livrer : hence the word Delivery.
X X
S42 TAMWORTH
Thomas de Clinton, that he and his heirs, his wife
and their heirs, might enjoy the liberty of fishing with
a boat an3rwhere in the water at Amington, with one
net called a Fleunet, and a Tramil and Sayna, when they
came to Tamworth or Middleton.' And he obtained a
confirmation of the charter of free-warren, dated at
Winchester, on the S4th of January, 1S48-9, which his
ancestors had previously enjoyed in Warwickshire.'
In the tempestuous reign of Henry III., Philip de
Marmyon became a person of no mean celebrity in
England. He was constituted sheriff of the counties of
Warwick and Leicester in 1849: and he retained the
office for three years. He was, at the same time, made
governor of the castle of Sauvey, in the latter shire.
But, in 1252, he was questioned finr sitting with Richard
de Mundevile, and the rest of the justices ibr the gaol-
delivery at Warwick, as he had no commission to
assume that office.
This nobleman attended the king into Crascoigne, in
125S, to aid in the suppression of a general revolt in
this province, which yet belonged to England. The
inhabitants had even called in the king of Castile to
take possession of their country. Henry arrived at
Bourdeaux, on the 15th of August. His powerful amy
soon subdued the rebels; and a reconciliation was made
between the two kings, and confirmed by the conclusion
of a marriage between prince Edward and Eleanor,
princess of Castile. Henry returned to England at the
close of the year, after having been magnificently en-
tertained fcHT eight days at Paris, by Louis. But many
1 ThomM'8 Dofdale.
9 Rot p«t. 37 H. VI. In 1S48, he brancht in Mdw ■gsinit Ba, oonntMi of War-
wick, for common of putore witliiii Uie lordsliip of SnttOD-CoMMd.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 84S
of the English nofaility^ on their way back, in the
following year, although they had letters of protection
firom the king of France, were taken prisoners by the
French in Poiteau. Amongst these, were John de
Pkssets, earl of Warwick, Grilbert de Segrave, and
Philip de Marmyon.
The detention of the lord of Tamworth-Castle was
not of a very long duration. For, in 1257, he joined
the expedition made into Wales, to put down the
rebellious natives. In the next year, he had summons,
with other great men, to resort to Chester, on the eve
of the nativity of St. John the Baptist; well furnished
with horse and arms, to march against Llewellyn ap
Griffith. And, in 1260, he was commanded, with all
the chief nobility, to be at London on the day after
the feast of Sts. Simon and Jude, for a similar purpose.
At this time, the barons b^an more openly to intrude
upon the royal prerogatives, by assuming powers, which
Henry knew not how to weild with judgment. They
fdaced sheriffs of their own election in numerous
counties of the realm. Philip de Marmyon, as a baron
in whose fidelity the king reposed great confidence, had
then, by special patent, the counties of Norfolk and
Suffolk committed to his care ; with the custody of the
castles of Norfolk and Orford. In 1262-S, he received
commands to attend at Hereford, on the Monday after
Candlemas day, to resist Llewellyn ap Griffith; as also
to be at Worcester, on the ensuing Lammas-day — 1263,
well accoutred, for the same purpose.
But, at this time, numerous of the most ^powerful
baions rose in rebellion to compel the king to give
his assent to the ordinances which they had drawn
up at Oxford, tending so greatly to undermine the
344 TAMWOKTH
royal' authority. They seized numerous of the castles,
and ravaged without mercy the lands of those who
refrained from joining them. Louis, IX., who was con-
stituted arbitrator, summoned the parties to Amiens,
on the 2Srd of January, that he might hear them
plead their respective causes. And he made both find
sureties on oath for their adherence to the determi-
nation which he should make. Philip de Marmyon,
being a person of unshaken loyalty, was chosen on
the part of the king.
Louis, on the Srd of February, pronounced his
sentence. He ordained that the provisions of Oxford,
as opposed to the regal prerogatives and to the ancient
constitution, should be annulled; the castles and lands
restored to the king; and also the nomination of the
great officers of state, and of the royal household. A
general amnesty was to be granted to all subjects for
past ofTences, and they should fully enjoy all the
liberties and privileges given to them by former
charters, the infraction of which had been the great
incitement to the insurrection. This award was not
agreeable either to the king or to the barons, but
especially to the latter; who immediately rejected it.
Hostilities were very soon commenced. Henry sum-
moned all the tenants of the crown to meet him at
Oxford. At first, fortune favoured his arms. He laid
siege to Northampton ; and it was taken by assault on
the dth of April, 1264; when Simon de Montfort, the
son of the leader of the barons, with the whole garrison,
was captured. Philip de Marmyon is named as being
present upon this occasion, with all the power which
he could raise. Leicester and Nottingham submitted to
prince Edward without any struggle.
CASTLB AND TOWN. S45
Henry then marched into the sonth of England to
relieve Rochester^ where the earl of Warenne was
besieged by the earl of Leicester. On the approach of
the royalists, Leicester retired to London. There he
was joined by fifteen thousand of the citizens: and,
with his forces thus augmented, he marched to encounter
his opponents. The two armies met near Lewes, in
Sussex, where a fierce battle ensued. Philip de Mar-
myon fought there for the king. The issue was fatal,
for Henry was captured, and Edward was soon compelled
to surrender himself into the hands of the baronial
party.
The battle of Evesham restored Heni^ HI. to his
throne. Philip de Marmyon appears to have joined in
it: and he was afterwards present during the famous
siege of Eenilworth-castle, which Henry de Hastings so
stubbornly maintained, for four months. Immediately
upon the surrender of this fortress, Philip was made
governor of it, for the king.^ He obtained by confisca-
tion the lands of Thomas de Endesore, a rebel; and
also all the king's demesnes, in Tamworth, especially
those of Henry de Hastings, as we have noticed in
other parts of our History. The lands of Endesore were
restored in consequence of the Dictum de Kenilworth ;
those of Hastings, at a subsequent period; and the
Warwickshire part Philip retained until his death.
The remainder of the life of Philip de Marmyon was
unmarked by any particular military exploits. In 1285,
he claimed by prescription and was allowed a court-leet
and gallows at Tamworth, with all waifs found in a
certain place called Ashland, within this manor, and
1 DiRctty after Uw siege, FhiUp de Bfannjron cairled aw»y from the castle, arms,
lead. Iron, and other things, to the Taloe of 10/. The legality of this proceeding
seems to bare been qoestloned.
346 TAMWORTH
also fiee-warren in his demerae-hnds here, and in those
belonging to the nuns of Folesworth, as he and his
anoestors had always had. He also then said that he
had gallows belonging to his manors of Bas-Whitacre,'
and Lea/ and at Middleton. And he, moreover, said
1 Vwrmrnm. Whitacmb wm iiOMBWifl by tbe Mannyoaa. With tiie PntrnTCBom.
olOM bf ItaBwortb. It WM gmntod, i*OTit tlw tlB0 or Slqihtt. or 11m beftaBlBK or
the nlgiior Hony II., by Bobert do Moimyan. to wnUm Rte Balph, to bold by
Mrrtoeofm kalglies fee. I9i Mm Balph File Italiib. hi ia96, wm coftified to bold
tfalsmanoroftbo loidof TtaKWOrth-Oaide, bytbatMrHoe: he ate had the mmv
or Glaicotb. Hla ton, Nidwias Flte Ralph, a knight, had iaaoe Gilea i wfaoee
danghte and hdnn laabcU, MMrtid Rdbci^ a yoaa««r aikvittaMte) iOB or III^
BfannyoB*
ThiBaobertdtManqranpooMaedHAi.i^Toif. IMhv.WhItaao wItt that plaoOp
PBrrycrofti, and <»aaoole, he pawed away to Ralph, kird Baaaet of Dnytan, far an
annoity of 401., to be paid daring hii natoialUfe. Robert gmve a yaid-buid in Whit-
acre to the none of Polecworth. He had a dani^iter nanod Aniloe, nairied let to
BaataoedeHardrahon,afterwBnlatoJ6bndeWhttacre. Bustace and Amioe, la iSM,
pawed awayatt tboir right and toterert in theee poeiesAipa to lord Baeeet. Ontho
death of her aeoond husband. Amice releaaed tolord Baaeet only the moiety of Nether-
WhItoQve. IfceothermohtypMBedtothefewttyortheWhitnega^ lAd Baaaet gnw
aw. of land and rent in thiaWbitaore, tor the endowment of acbantry conflating or three
prieetii founded by hfan to ttie chmch or Ilrayton.Bawet. For thii pmpoee, hi IS38,
he obtained the khig*elio«nGe, and that of Baldwhi de Ftoirile,Baperiorlard of the fee.
Two yeara after, he pawed away the rwldne to WBUam de Clinton, eail of Hontmc-
don. The latter, aoon after, ezehanged It with Richard and AmabUde Whttacre for
their moiety of the manor of Perrycrofta. Uabel, daughter or Amice and John de
Whitocre, waa Burried to air Thonaa de Bimfaigfaam, knt. Of his two dangfatare,
Kleana, married Kdmnnrt Fcrrera of Chartley, and Elizabeth. George LongvUe.
Glaaoote pasaed in the same aaannar oa Whitacre.
Dbakbnbdob was a member of Nether- Whitacre, and giren by the Mannyona to
Nicholas Fits Ralph or his ancestor. Of Us bdrs, the fhaelly of 9fanoettcr hdd It,
by service of a pair of gilt epors.
In 1S91, it is eaid that Robert de Marmyonbdd of Philip, a knight*s fee hi Whitacre
and Onkanedge, which Robeitde Manoetter had. In 1994, he heU thesame: and
Joan Mortetai held the fee of the lord king. In 1344, William de CUnton had ttie
moiety of the manor of Nether-Whitacrek except twenty pounds retain, of Baldwin
Freyile, by military service. In 1S54, William de Clinton, eari of Hontingdon, held,
at hia death, the moiety of amessoage, a canicate of land, six acrw of plantation, four
acrea of meadow, and IW. retora in this place, of air Baldwin fterfle, by mllitajy
senrioe. In 1387, sir Baldwto Frevile held, at his death, a knight's fee to Whitacre
and Drakenedge, which the heirs of Thomaa de Birmingham had. And finally, in
1435, Xdmuid Ferrers, of the Inheritance of Kleana his wife, had the moiety or the
manor of Whitacre," by vnknownsenriee.'* (Inqnlaitlons.)
9 LBA-juxTA-MAmsTON, WBs InTolved with Whitacre, and belonged to the Mar-
myoBs. It was granted, with BmaTPoan, on the Watling-street, near Ftedey, now
depopolated, to Thomas Fits Thiustan, cslled also Thomss de Teunworth, aa he lived
here, and waa probably a retainer of the Marmyons. This Thomas by marriage with
the daughter of Ketelbom [Kettlebrook] de Langdon, aoqnired the manor of Imng-
don. Ris descendants sssnmed the name **dc la Launde.'* Lea, Stretford, and
Langdon, passedtoThoxstan, hia son; Ralph, his son; and James, his sen, who passed
away Langdon. Lea and Stretford went on to John, the son of Jaaewj and to James
de la Launde, his son. Jamw waa the last of his family. In I8d7» hequltled aU the
CASTLE AND TOWN. 847
that he held the C&stle of Tamworth; with mills, and
meadows, and lands called Ashland, and the advowson
of the Church, as belonging to his barony, of his own
right and inheritance^
In his works of piety, he was not bx behind the
custom of his times. He gave an annual rent of 20«.,
issuing out of certain houses in London, to the hospital
of St. Thomas of Acres in that city. He also founded
the hospital of St. James, close to Tamworth. In accord-
ance with the directions of the king's writ, an inquisition
was taken, in 1285, to ascertain the amount of damage
which the crown would sustain, if licence should be given
to Philip de Marmyon to assign to the master of the
hospital, for the maintenance of five priests who should
celebrate divine service there, five messuages, one mill,
three carucates and thirty-eight acres of land, twenty*
two acres of meadow, twenty-three acres and three roods
of plantation, and the return of one pound of pepper,
and one of cummin, with appurtenances, in Coningsby,
Haltham, Wood-Enderby, Wilksham, Dalderby, Scri-
velsby, and Lincoln, and the advowson of the church of
Wilksby. And it was said, on the oaths of Peter de
Dalderby; John de Weingworth, in Scrivelsby; Hugh
Fraunkelayn, of Langton ; Robert Fits Nigel, of Hem-
ingby ; Richard le Chapelayn, of the same pboe; William
Cade, of Stretton; Wilfirid de Stretton; William de
latcnstwIiiehheluulinLeatohismottierAliaiiore} and the, in 1870, by deed, dated
■ft TuBwatth^pMcedawajr the same to fir Baldwin neriletloBt., and bis heln. Strat-
ford had come to tlie nrerHes aboat 1345. Both these places belonged to the lords of
the Ctetia lior many aces; vntfl the beginnfaiff of the reign of Ghailea I., whm Lea
was sold by air John Ferrers, knt., to Charles Adderly, esq.
MAmsTow, in the Oonqoeror's ttane, bdonged, as did Lea, to Robert Dispensator,
and ooatahMd than nine hides. Torehil de Warwick had three hides there. It was
loan all in the poaseoilon of the Marmyons, and received the disthictiTe appellation of
Marston-Maraiyon. In 1934, Robert de Bfannyon answered half a knighfs fee for it.
The MarmyonB were the sopcrior lords of the fee, and the family of Limesi of Maz-
toke held it.
348 TAMWORTH
Wurthon, in Haltham ; Robert le Taiiiir^ of the same
place; Robert de Thometon; Robert Colyer, of Coningsby ;
and Thomas de Pyndur^ of the same place ; that all these
possessions, being appurtenances of the manor of Scn-
velsby long before, that is, in the time of king John,
were held of the king, in capite, by Philip de Marmyon,
who had reacquired them, after his ancestors had alien-
ated them, at different periods. With the advowson of
the church, they were, in all issues, of the annual value
of 8/. Ids, l^d. : which would be just the amount of
damage incurred by the king, if the manor of ScriYelsby
were in his own hands.'
Two years afterwards, Philip de Marmyon granted this
hospital, with its appurtenances, and pasture in Ashfield
for four oxen and two horses, to William de* Combery
Hall, for a time, there to celebrate services for his soul,
until he should place in it either religious men of the
Fremonstratentian order, or secular priests, who should
bear upon them signum cljrpei.' This hospital remained
to the time of Henry VIII. ; and, in 15S4, when Rob^t
Perrott was chaplain, was endowed with lands valued at
3/. 68, Sd, annually.* The remains of the ' spital-diapel,'
now converted into a small dwelling-house and bam,
still stand at a very little distance firom the northern
boundary of the old borough of Tamworth.
Philip de Marmyon was the last of the elder branch
of the family ; and died in 1291. By his first wife Joan,
he had three daughters, Joan, Mazera, and Maud or
Matilda. Joan was married to William Mortein ; Mazera
died in her fEither's life time, but left by her husband,
Ralph de Cromwell, a daughter Joan. Matilda was
1 Inqnis., ISB. i.:~Buiks*8Hist. % TMiner*t Not Monast.
s Valor EodflsiMt.
CASTLS AND TOWN. S49
married to Ralph le Boteler. By his second wife Mary^
who survived him until ISli, he had another daughter
Joan. By the inquisition taken after his deaths on the
13th of March, 1S91-2, it is certified that he held
the Castle of Tamworth, with all its members and
appurtenances, of the king> in capite, by military ser-
vice, finding three knights, at his own costs, in the
Welsh war, for forty days. And he held the manor of
Scrivelsby of the king, by barony; and the manor of
Langton, in Lincolnshire. And he had also the manors
of Feme, Lastrin, and Bradford, in the county of
Hereford, of the inheritance of Joan his wife.^ His
next heirs were, Joan, wife of William de Mortein ;
Joan, daughter of Mazera and Ralph Cromwell ; Matilda,
wife of Ralph Boteler; and Joan his daughter, then
only eight years old.
Upon the partition of the lands amongst these coheir-
esses, the Castle of Tamworth was assigned to Joan, the
eldest daughter ; and, in her right, William de Mortein
possessed it. Scrivelsby was given to Joan the youngest
child ; she carried it eventually to Thomas de Lodelow ;
and their grand-daughter, to sir John Dymoke; whose
direct descendant still enjoys it.
Joan Mortein died in 1294. As she had no issue,
the Castle of Tamworth, by agreement made amongst
1 In tlie Appendix, Note S8, we t^re a more detailed aceonnt of the poweeMione of
the lords of the GMtle fhnn to E. J to 87 H. VI, taken fhnn the "Calendariwninqai-
■ittaniiin poet mortem siTe eacaetarom,*' pnbliahed by royal command.
9 Philip deManayon, it seans, had wme illegitimate tone, bom of the lame mother
apparently, and, we shonld ooiUectare, between hie lint and second marriages. Of
thase, the most noted was Robert, a yonncer son, whom we have had occasion else,
where to mention. He was a knight, and bore for his arms,— three swords in pale,
pointing downwards, with a chief vatary.
To this tiunUy, we may, perhsvs, refer many indiridnals of the name of Manayon,
of whom very little is known. Peter de Marmyon « de borgeny seooten, " is named
in the ooort-roUs of Tamworth, in 13M. Galfrid was presented to the church of Great
Parktngton, in 1819. Brother Robert de Marmyon was elected keeper or governor of
the hoapttal of St. Thomas hi Birmingham, in issO.
Y Y
S50 TAMWORTH
the rest of the coheiresses, was allotted to Alexander de
Fievile, who had married Joan, daughter of Ralph
Cromwell.
▲RMS OP lUamrOM:— TAiKT am. amp as., a rsM ov.
RoBBiiT DB MAiMTOW.lardorsiiiUsont.
FWitenftT, in NonMmdy} ttew-
ard of WUL I.; l«t butm of
Tamworth-OMUs uul Sorlrals-
by ; d. tenip» Hen. I. ^ .
RoMET DB lCARMTOif,=MMHl dB Roeer.
Snd teron of TiuBWQith
CMttg,&C| ■lain 1143.
bRobbbt db lCA«MTOir,«Pliiltppa. OttOttr, Rklianl.
kOfTMBWOKttl. (Snd^itfB, IIW.,
I Caatle» &c., d. about my.
RoBBBT DB Mabmton, Robbbt, tbe Wnilim. Albreda, Robot Rkliard.
tlM elder, 4t]i baron of yoonger, of I 18M.BWiL d. s. p.
Tunwoith.Caafle,&c.,d. Wlnterinffbam. I deCamTOe.
in 1S41. I
I
Joan, dao. sPbilip db Mabmt. sMary, wiuam. ?niHaa», ata-
andooh.of i'ov,6UiaBdla8tba- 1 snd I ran ^ ^i*t
Hacb do ron of Tunwnrtb- wllb. laO^ d- ••'•
KOlpeck. I Oartle. d. ispi. | |
I i — I I (
Joan, «Wiluam ICascra sRalpb Maud-sRalph Tho. dosJoansHenry Jcdu. «
d. 1994. I DB Mob- d. t. p.
TBIN.
Ciom- le Bo. Lodelow BU- baron
well. teler. isthost lary. by writ,
I d. lasi.
Joan, grand-dan. sAlbzandbb Tbomaa de Jolm, a Joan.B Arice.
and eoh. of P. de I DB Pbbvilb. Lodelow. boron by Sir Jobn sjbtan
Marmyon. I I writ, d. Ber. lord
' ' ISU. nack. Grey.
I
MargaretsSIr John Dy- Robert d.
moke, knt. FPom them t. p.
•pring the Dymckn of
Scriveliby, co. Unooln,
rfi^mpinm of England.
The fiEunily of Frevile^ originally of Camhridgeshire,
was of great eminence, both before and aflter this time,
although only one of them, Dugdale says, ever re-
ceiyed simmions as a baron of the realms. This was
Alexander/ who thus acquired the Castle: being heir
of his brother, sir Baldwin Frevile, knt., he inherited,
in 1289, many possessions in the counties of Norfolk
and Hereford.
1 In 1 Bdw. IU.,*13S7.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 361
Alexander de Frevile was principally employed in the
Scottish wars. In 1301^ he was engaged in the expedi-
into Scotland ; and in 130S, 1304, and 1305, he served
in that kingdom. And, in 1314, — the year in which
the battle of Bannockbum was fought, — ^he received
commands to repair to Newcastle-upon-Tyne, by the
feast of the Assumption of the blessed Virgin Mary;
well fitted with horse and arms, in order to march
against the rebellious Scots. We find Uttle more con-
cerning his military exploits, except that he was included
in a summons, dated at Ramsay, on the 5th of April,
1827, to repair to Newcastle-upon-Tyne, with horse and
arms, in order to serve against Robert Bruce.
Upon the division of the lands of Isabell wife of
William Waldraun, in 1809, Alexander de Frevile,
obtained in right of Joan his wife, one of her cousins
and heirs, the manors of Winterboume and Ashton,
with other lands at Yatesbury, in Wiltshire. By his
lady, he had a son and heir named Baldwin, to whom
he, in 13S8, assigned the Castle of Tamworth, reserving
it, however, to himself and his wife, during their natural
lives, to be held by them directly of the king. For this
purpose, Edward II. issued a writ to ascertain what
damage the crown would sustain if the royal permission
were granted. An inquisition was accordingly taken at
Warwick, in the presence of the escheator of the king,
on the Monday before the feast of the Nativity of our
Lord: upon the oaths of William de Blithe, Anketell
de Bracebigg, John de Longedon, John le Botiller,
Henry le Bray, John de Sekindon, William de Blac-
greve, Henry Skil, Robert de Aula, Henry Cuckeu, Ralph
le Beauchaump, and Richard Vilars. They stated upon
oath that it was not to the damage or prejudice of the
852 TAMWORTH
lord king, if he should concede to Alexander and Joan
that they might enfeoff Baldwin of their Castle of Tarn-
worthy with its appurtenances, which was held of the
king in capite, to be held by Baldwin and his heirs of
the king and his successors, by the due and accustomed
services : so that Baldwin, having fiill and peaceable seisin
of the Castle and its appiurtenances, might give it to
Alexander and Joan, to be held by them their whole
lives, immediately of the king and his heirs. And they
farther stated that the Oastle, with its appurtenances , was
held of the lard king in capite, by the sermces of coming
to the coronation of the lord Idng, completely armed wUh
royal arms of the lioery of the lord king, and siting
upon the principal royal war-horse, and opposing himself
against any person who should gainsay the royal coro-
nation. If none shotdd offer opposition, throughout the
whole proceedings, the arms and war-horse should revert
to the royal use : but, if any should oppose themsdees,
the arms with the war-horse should be taken for the use
of the tenant, himself, of the CasHe. And the Castle,
with its appurtenances, in all its issues, was valued,
a-year, according to its true worth, at ten marks. It
was also declared that there remained to Alexander and
Joan, beyond the Castle, a third part of the manor of
Middleton, in Warwickshire, of the inheritance of Joan,
which was held of the Church of St. Editha at Tam-
worth, in capite, by service of 2a. 2^. and the third
part of a half-penny : and it was valued, a-year, in all
its issues, according to its true worth, at 10/. Also they
possessed the manor of Feme, in Herefordshire, with
appurtenances, of the inheritance of Joan, which was
held of the lord king in capite, by service of the fourth
part of a knight's fee : and valued, a-year, according to
CASTLE AND TOWN. 353
its true worthy at 100^. They also held Crownest> in
Worcestershire^ of the inheritance of Alexander^ of the
abbey at Worcester^ by service of a rose annually : and
valued^ a-year^ in all its issues^ according to its true
value, at 40«. And finally they held Bughall, in Wor-
cestershire, of the inheritance of Alexander, of the bishop
of Worcester, by service of 5s. : and valued, a-year, in all
its issues, according to its true value, at 40«.^ The
annual value of all these possessions, therefore, was 251.
ISs. 4rf.
So &vourable an answer having been returned to the
writ, letters patent were granted by the king, dated at
Kenilworth on the last day but one of December follow-
ing, in which, a fine of 20/. having been paid to the king
by Baldv?in, licence was given to Alexander and Joan
that they might enfeoff Baldwin of the Castle, to be held
by him and his heirs of the king and his successors
by the due and usual services for ever : and to Baldwin
that he, having fiill and peaceable seisin, might give it
to Alexander and Joan, to be held for the whole life of
either of them, firom the king, by the accustomed
services. And, after the death of Alexander and Joan,
the Castle should revert entirely to Baldwin and his
heirs, who should hold it of the king, and render the
services to him.'
But, very shortly afterwards, it would seem that a
dispute arose between Alexander and Baldwin, appa-
rently firom the latter having neglected to perform his
part of the stipulation, to make a grant of the Castle
to the former. However, Alexander and Joan retained
a forcible possession. In the ensuing Easter term, a
suit took place, Baldwin being plaintiff and Alexander
1 Inqnis., 17 Kd. 11. s Letters patent, 17 Ed. 11.
S54 TAMWORTH
and Jotn deforaants of the Casde. An agieement
was made by pieoept of the king himself. Baldwin
granted the Oastle to Alexander and Joan, for their lites,
and settled the reversion upon himself/
All these partictdars, except the decision of the suit
which Thomas gives in his edition of Dugdale, have
been hitherto entirely unknown. Interesting, however,
as these circumstances may be, the testimony that the
Castle of Tamworth was held by the Royal Champicm-
ship is of fiir greater importance than any other point
It must be observed that this is the earliest record of
any nature tehaisoever which menUans such an office in
this country as that of the hinges Champion. It forms
the first link of the chain of evidence, which we shall
adduce upon this point, in vindication of the honour
of Tamworth. It is worthy of remark that, before the
coronation of Edward III., no mention is made of the
Champion having exercised his duties. This can scarcely
excite surprise, as the accounts of the ceremony, in die
majority of previous instances, have not been preserved.
But, when Edward III. was crowned, on the 1st of
February, 1326-7, Alexander de FrefoUe performed the
office of Campion J in right of his barony and CasUe of
Ihmtoorth* This circumstance, it is true, we give only
on the authority of Collins : and it might be called in
question, were it not supported by evidence which
stamps with the mark of undeniable authenticity.
Alexander de Frevile died in 1328, before his wife;
leaving Baldwin his son and heir, then thirty-six years
of age. Edward III. directed a writ to the escheator of
1 Tbomu tttachfld the accoont of the tait in m note to the name of Baldwin, too.
tfacr of Alexander. Had he paid attention to Dngdale^ naisiiMl nfefenoe^ he woaM
have Men that this Baldwin had been dead some yean.
9 OolUna*a Peerage.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 355
the county of Warwick, commanding him to enquire
what lands he held of the crown in capite, and by what
service, on the day of his death. An inquisition was
according taken. The jurors then stated upon oath,
amongst other smaller matters, that he held, jointly with
Joan his wife, the Castle of Tamworth of the lord king,
in capite, by service of coming to the coronation of the
lord king completely armed with royal arms of the livery
of the lord king, and sitting upon the principal royal
toarJwrse, offering himself to make trial of combat in the
king's place against all persons gainsaying the coronation
of the king. If no one should make cpposition, the arms
and horse should belong to the lord king, but if any one
should oppose himself and engage in encounter, they
should remain to the tenant of this Castle.^ All the pos-
sessions of Alexander were, according to custom, taken
into the king's hands. Soon afterwards, the king directed
his writ, dated at Clepston, on the 25th of August, to
the escheator of Warwickshire, stating that, as it ap-
peared by the inquisition, Alexander died seized of the
Castle jointly with Joan, and that it teas held by Boyql
Championship,* he should deUyer it up to Joan, who had
done fealty for the same.' This inquisition and writ of
livery have been regarded as the earliest records of the
office of Champion. We have given a document several
years older.
Joan de Frevile continued in the possession of Tarn-
worth-Castle, for a considerable time. She died in
1340 : and the inquisition then taken states that she was
seized of the Castle, which she held of the king in capite,
1 Rotput 1 Rle.II.,paxBl.,p.liitpac.
9 The wards an the Hune as in the inqniiitioii, except that "ftominaa res '* ie
neoMsarfly changed hi " noeter.*'
s Rot. pat., 1 Rlc. II., pan i », p. inipez.
S56 TAMWORTU
ijf service of acting as Champion,^ — ^tke same words being
used as those in the inquisition at the decease of her
husband.'
Baldwin de Frevile, performing the customary homage
to the king, had full possession of his mother's estates^
Of him, little is known, except that he held, for a very
brief space of time, the Warwickshire part of Tamworth,
granted him by Edward IL, in 1S17.
In 1342, he borrowed of sir Fulk de Birmingham,
knt., the sum of forty-eight marks ; for which he gave
his creditor five mills at Tamworth. — 'three of which
were situated on the Warwickshire side, and two on the
Staffordshire side, — in lease for the term of one year.'
He died three years after his mother; leaving by
Elizabeth Ins wife, a son and heir, Baldwin, then twenty-
six years old.
Baldwin, in the following year, did homage, and had
livery of all the lands of his inheritance ; which lay in
the counties of Warwick, Hereford, Salop, Stafford, Wor-
cester, Wilts, Norfolk, and Suffolk. In 1352, he was a
knight, and bore for his arms, — Or, a cross flory Gu;
and for his crest, — ^upon a chapeau, the leg of a man
booted, spurred, and reversed. Not long afterwards, he
substituted a plume of feathers for the latter. He fought
in the warfiire with France: and was greatly esteemed
by Edward the Black Prince. For his approved fidelity
and service, the prince, in 1364, constituted him his
seneschal of Xantoigne, during his life.
In 1368, sir Baldwin Frevile went with the Black
prince, in his wars of Gascoigne; and soon afterwards
he accompanied John of Gaunt, earl of Lancaster, to
1 By depntjr of ooune. S Inqnis. p. mort«m, la X. III., no u.
s Dncdalo'g Wurwickshln. Thia wort has been mainly oonsnlted In the aoooont
of the Fteyiles.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 357
Mount-Paon^ and was present when it surrendered to
the English. In 1372^ he was retained by indenture
to serve prince Edward in the French wars ; with six
men at arms^ — three knights and three esquires, taking
SO/, a-year for the former, and ten marks for the latter.
After the withdrawal of the Black-prince into England,
on account of his increasing and eventually &tal ill-
health, sir Baldwin continued in France. It happened
very singularly, that he, being one of the leaders of the
English, with others, accompanied by full six hundred
men, entered Rochelle on the evening of midsummer-day,
1S7S, when John Hastings, earl of Pembroke, was
defeated and taken prisoner. The Spaniards, intoxicated
with joy at their victory, had set sail that afternoon for
their own country. Sir Baldwin and his companions
were completely ignorant of the disastrous occurrence.
When they heard the news, they were sorely afflicted,
and considered themselves more unfortunate than they
had ever yet been, in not having arrived at the place
sooner to aid their countrymen.'
Sir Baldwin died in 1375. He had three wives, —
Elizabeth, sister and coheiress of sir John Mountford,
knt., of Beaudesert, in Warwickshire; Ida, daughter of
Clinton, a lady of honour to queen Philippa ; and
Joan, daughter of lord Strange. By his first wife, he
had a son and heir, Baldwin, who, at his father's
decease, was a knight, and twenty-four years of age.
At the coronation of Richard II., which took place
at Westminster, on the 16th of July, 1377, the right
of sir Baldwin Frevile to perform the celebrated service
of Championship, was disputed by sir John Dymoke,
owner of Scrivelsby. The latter petitioned that he
1 Frolssart.
Z Z
358 TAMWORTH
might be allowed the office^ as appertaining to him, in
right of Margaret his wife, by tenure of Scriyelsby, as
her ancestors had in the time of the king's progen-
itors. Margaret was the grand-daughter of Philip de
Mamiyon, by Joan his youngest child. Sir Baldwin
Frevile immediately put in a counter-claim. He
petitioned for his right, because he was one of the
heirs of Philip de Marmyon, "qe come tient Chastell de
Tamworth, en le Countee de Warrewyk, de n*re tres-
doubte S' le Roi, come de Coronne, d'el Heritage le dit
Philip a la dit file afferant en p'te de sa purp'tie, p'
les services d'estre a la Coronement n're, dit S' le
Roi, in ses Armures, & sur un des Destres le Roi; si
nul Toleit contredire son dit Coronement de la deffiendre
come a lui app'tient," &c.^
The cause was now brought forwards for adjudication.
It does not appear that sir Baldwin produced all if any
of his evidences in support of his claim. Sir John
Dymoke did so; and thereupon the king commanded
that he, *'ista vice," should perform the service, in
right of the manor of Scrivelsby. But, if sir Baldwin,
within three weeks after the feast of St. Hilary next
ensuing, should come and show the reasons and eviden-
ces by which he supported his demand, he should be
heard, and full justice done to him. In consequence
of this decision, sir John Dymoke acted as Champion
at this coronation. Sir Baldwin afterwards produced
his evidences: they were exemplified by the king, and
enrolled upon the records of the court of Chancery.*
Very little is recorded of this sir Baldwin Frevile.
In 1879, he was appointed one of the commissioners
1 Claiu. et Clam. Coronat. I Rlc. II. m. 44 :— Banka's Hist,
a Rot. pat, 1 Rfc. II., pan I.
CASTLE AND TOWN. S59
for the arraying of men in the county of Warwick.
On the partition of the lands of sir John Mountford,
in 1385, to which he was heir in his mother's right,
jointly with sir Thomas Boteler, knt., he had assigned
to him, the manor of Ashtead, in Surrey; Gunthorpe
and Lowdham, in the county of Nottingham ; and the
reversion of the manors of Henley, Beaudesert, and
Haselholt, in Warwickshire, which William de Beau-
champ, lord of Abergavenny, retained for his natural
life. He was espoused to Elizabeth, the daughter of
sir John Botetourt, of Weorley-casde, in Worcestershire,
in 185S, when he was about two years old; but she
died very young. He afterwards married her sister
Joioe. She eventually out-lived him, and took as her
second husband sir Adam Peshale.^ This Joice became,
in 1406, one of the coheiresses of Joice her niece, only
child of John, son of sir John Botetourt; and thus
were conveyed to Ferrers, owner of Tamworth-Castle,
very considerable lands.
Sir Baldwin Frevile died in 1387. The inquisition
taken upon his decease specifies that he held the Castle
of Tamworth of the lord king, in capite "/>cr seruicium
vemendi ad coronaconem Domini Regis, in armis regiis
de liberacone Domini Regis universaliter armatus, super
principalem dextrarium Domini Regis sedens, offerens se
ad probaconem pro Rege faciend* contra omnes coro-
naconem Regis contradicentes : et si nuBus contradizerii
sint arma et equm Domini Regis; si atttem aliquis se
opponat et congressum faciat, remanebunt arma et equus
dicto tenenti.**
1 Adam PMliale» and Joice bit wife, in 1880, granted the manon of Lee and Stret-
ford, near IWnwortb, and a third part of the manor of Mlddlcton, which were of the
dofwcrr of Joice, to Baldwin FkwUe, for 900/. aterlinff.
9 Such are the words in which the Mnrice of Champion ia named in the docn-
mcnta bdonffisf to TUnworth-Castle, except in the inqniaition of 1398, which ia thna
860 TAMWORTH
Sir Baldwin bad a son and heir, named Baldwin,
who sncceeded him. He was nineteen years old at his
father's death: and, in the following year, he married
Joan, daughter of sir Thomas Green, knt At the
coronation of Henry IV., on the 18th of October, 1899,
he exhibited his claim to the office of Champion, in
opposition to that of Margaret, widow of sir John
Dymoke. But she, by her son, was permitted to perform
the service.'
The last sir Baldwin died in 1400; and it was then
stated that he was seized of the Castle of Tamworth,
valued altogether at 12/. a-year, by the same service as
his father,* — ^that of Royal Championship.
As it is the last time that this distinguished office
is mentioned in connection with Tamworth, we may
here draw the subject of the Championship to a con-
clusion. The claim in the reign of Henry IV. is the
last upon record in favour of the Castle. The possessor
when Henry V. ascended the throne was a minor; and
the Castle afterwards passed by a coheiress to the
Ferrers' family. As no records are now extant containing
the proceedings on this matter, at any of the coronations
from Henry V. to James I., it is impossible to ascertain
if the claim were renewed or not. The Dymokes have
continued to perform the office to the present time.
The first document which mentions the service in con-
nexion with Scrivelsby, is dated in 8 Edw. HI., — 1334.
Tamworth- Castle possesses three older records upon this
worded. *' Et (Joratores] dicu*t q'd d'c*in Cutru*. ca* p*tlB\ ten«t* de d'no B/egt, In
cmplte, p' BcmicU veniendi «d ooronaco'em d*iii Regis, urmit regito de Ub'aoo'e d*ni
Regis vnia'ssJit' annataB, sup' p'Dcipale' dextr*him regin' sedans, oni*ini* se appane'a
coronacionl regie contradicentl: q'd sinnllnsse, p' totam dietam, oppoaaerit, arma
p*d'ca & dextrMom in tsus reglos rea*tant. SI ante* aliqola se opposnerit, d*ca anna
cu' dext'rio in Tsna tenent ipUns tenentis Cutrl p*d*d.**
1 Rot. Senr. ad Coron. R. H. IV. 9 Inqnis. 2 H. IV.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 361
paint. The inquisitions both of Tamworth-Castle and
Scrivelsby state that they were held by the same
service. The Intimate conclusion is^ that they were
given to the Marmyons at the same time, and to be
enjoyed by the same tenure. Therefore, the owners of
these two places ought to exercise the office of Royal
Champion aUematdy. Such is the case with various
other services, where the property originally granted
has been since divided amongst different owners. It
may be asked if the laches would not extinguish the
right ; which would then belong solely to the Dymokes,
on account of their long enjoyment of it. This question
the house of Peers alone can decide. In the case of
lord Grey of Ruthyn, at the coronation of James II.,
it was agreed that the laches would not have that
effect. Omissions were then proved for nearly three-
hundred years.*
Baldwin Frevile was succeeded by his son and heir
Baldwin, at that time only two years old. This last
sir Baldwin died upon the Thursday in the third week
of Lent, 1418, being still a minor and unmarried. He
left his three sisters his coheirs, Elizabeth, Joice, and
Margaret. The eldest was married to Thomas Ferrers;
the next, to Roger Aston; and the youngest, to Hugh
WiUoughby, afterwards to sir Richard Bingham, knt.
A partition of the possessions of which sir Baldwin
Frevile died seized, is stated to have been made amongst
the coheiresses, on the 17th of August, 1423; whose
husbands, in their right, held them. To Thomas Ferrers,
were given, — ^the Castle and manor of Tamworth, valued
at 21/. 17*. ll^rf.; Taddington, at 16/.; Merston, at 17/.
13*. ^d.\ Combe, at 10/. 6*.; Stivichall, at 11/. 2«.
1 CoUins't Frecedoita.
S62 TAMWOBTH
4Elf8 OP FSXVILB:— om, a cso« vlobt ov.
ALMXAM^mm^m F«aTiLa»inrittitBiOAM, daa. of Ratah Oromirtil;
of hla wife, lord of Tunwoith- I graad-dao. and oo£. of Philip de
Caattei d» I3M. | Utnajon, d. in lS4a.
B^LDwiir OB FaariLa, » Witahaf h. Ilan;ant.s8ir
b. in 199S} lord of T.- 1 Renry WilBngtan,
Casae, d. in 1S43. | knL
KUsabetli, alat =B» BAu>inir na FaaTii.B,=Ida,danof .... CHa^sJoan, dan. of
and coh. of sir
JobnMoantfbrdp
luit.,ofBeand«».
at,— itt wife.
b. In l817;lordaf T.-Caatte; too ; a lady of honor lordStnuicei
craatadaknU in 1S6S| d.in to Queen PhlUppa; Snlwife,lf7l.
lS7ft> tDdwiHi, lt6l.
Xlizabath,daa.of8irs8» Baldwiw PaaFiLB,sJaioa, aUtcr of his 1st
JolinBotatDait,knt., b. In IMi) lord of T.. | wife. nMwasmar.affam
of Weorley .caatte, Cartle) d in 1S87> I to air Adam Peahala.
lUS. I
Bin Bal»wi» PBsyiLB,sJoan, dan. of air
b. In ladei lord of T,. I Tim. Gfen, knti
' - -.in I -
Castle ) d. in 1400. \ IS96.
T
8ia Baldwin Faa- XLi8ABBTn,aTB0MAa FaaMaa JalcesRo> MaifaialsiA.
Sod son of Win. 1. get Atton. Hogh WQIonc^.
▼iLB, b. in 1396) d. cota
In 1418, aminor, 8.r. her
cohelreis of
brother.
Femn of Gtoby . by =sndarRich.
ard T'
knt.
8d.; Stretford, at lOU. 8d.; Coventry, at S4«. 6d.; and
Waverton, at 4/. 12rf.— total 87/. Is. id. To Boger
Aston, were assigned, — ^Ashtead, estimated at 48/. 9s.
6Jc/. ; Henley-in-Arden, at 23/. 5s. 8 Jc/. ; Pinley, at 12/.
Sd. ; Becknor, at S9s. Sd. ; and Yatesbury, at 43^. 4d., —
total 87/. 18*. To Hugh Willoughby were given,— Mid-
dleton, valued at S3/. 5s. 2^d. ; Gunthorpe, at 16/. 14«.
9Jrf.; Wyken, at 16/. 10*. 8d.; Bradford, at 106«. Sd.;
Feme, at 8/.; Whitnash, at 48*.; Maun, at 73/. Sd.;
Whitley, at 9*. 4d. ; Coventry, at 9*. ; and the return
of a fourth part of the manor of Ashtead, at 10*. lie/.,
—total 87/. 6*. lOrf.^
1 Snch It the ■tatementKlTen in an old parchniententitled'*Pticiot*re ft tenement'
qae teer* Baldewyni FreTUe die obitns toi} videl't, int* Thorn* de Farrar* , . . . . Boc^nm
Aston,.... ft Hogon' Wyloof hby, . . . . fsct' a^d Leyc*, XT^die Aognsti, A« R. B.
Henr* seztt post conqnesta* p*mo. Yet it seems that no soch division was hi eOtet,
but that the husbands of the three coheiresses had concurrent interests in the whole,
although niOBias Ferrers inhabited the Castle. Perhaps the "paxtiCio'* was not
adopted. But the document Is of great use, because It giTca the Talne of the
CASTLE AND TOWN.
363
TUs Thomas Ferrers was second son of William, lord
Ferrers of Groby, of the eminent family of the ancient
earls of Derby.
Pedigree of the Ferreks' family.
Walcheline, a Norman. His
son»
Hekrt, assumed the surname de
Ferrariis or Ferrers, from a small
town in Gastenois, abounding with
iron-mines. In allasion to his name,
he bore six horse-shoes for his arms.
He came into England with the Con-
queror; and had granted to him
lands in the cos. of Berks, Derby,
Essex, Gloucester, Hereford, Lei-
cester, Northampton, Nottingham,
Stafford, Warwick, and Wilts. He
seated himself at Tntbury-castle : and
there, in 1080, he founded a monas-
tery for Cluniaic monks. By Bertha,
he had issue,
I.-II. EOOBltVLFBand WlL., i(.«.p.
m. BoBSRT, hit soccenor.
IT. Amicb. m. to Jflgti de Albioi.
▼.-TI. GtTNDBBDA, BOd EmMBLII^B.
Robert de Ferrers, for his
serrices in war against Maud's sup-
porter, David k. of Scots, was, in
1138, created earl of Derby, by Ste-
phen. He d. in 1139 ; leaving, by
Hadewise,
I. Isold A, m. to Stepb. de Beauebamp.
n. Matilda, m. to Bertimodde Yerdon.
m. RoBBBT, his heir.
!▼. A da v., m. to WBlcbeline Maminot.
▼. WalcbeUne, baron of Okebam, co.
of Rutland, 1 104 ; Uving 1191. He bad
1. HvoH, baron of Okefaam, who m.
the dao. and b. of Hu^b de Say ; Ht-
ing 1197, bat d, t. p, n. Wil., d. v.
p. and «. p. And m. Isabbll, m. to
Bag. de Mortimer; belieM of ber
brother.
Robert de Ferrers, 2nd earl
of Derby, styled himself " Robertus,
comes junior de Ferrariis," end "Ro-
bertus, comes junior de Notingham."
He founded Merevale-abbey, oo. of
Warwick (tee. p. 56), and lies bur,
there. He was succeeded by his
son and heir,
William sb Ferrers, 3rd earl
of Derby, living 1 167. He m. Mar-
garet, dau. and h. of Will. Peverel,
3rd and last lord of Nottingham;
and had.
1. RoBBKT, biB saccessor
u. Walcbblinb, lord of Enerton, co.
of Derby, who m. Goda, daa. of Rob.
deTonl.
Robert de Ferrers, 4th earl of
Derby, sided with pr. Henry in his
rebelUon against his father. Hen. II.
He was pardoned ; but his castles of
Tutbury and Duffield were demolish-
ed. By Sibilla, his wife, dau. of
William de Braose, he left issue,
1. Wil. bis heir.
n. MiuscBNT, m. to Rogrer de Morti-
mer, of Wlffinore.
m. AoATUA, mistress of k. John.
IV. Pbtbowblla, m. to Harvey, lord-
StaiTord.
William de FERRERSwas depri-
ved of his earldoms by Rich. I., in
1189 ; but they were soon restored.
He accompanied the king into Pales-
tine ; and fell at the siege of Acre,
in 1190. BySibella,hiswife,heleft,
I. Wil., bis belr.
II. Hbnry, m. Margsret,
m. ROBBBT.
William de Ferrers, 6th earl
of Derby, noted for his firm attach-
ment to John and Hen. III. in aU
their troubles, d. Sept. 22nd, 1247.
In that month, his countess Agnes d.
She was one of the daus. of Hugh
Cyvelioc, earl palatine of Chester,
and sist. and coh. of Ralph Blun-
devile, earl of Chester and Lincoln.
By her, he had
I. WiL., bis heir.
II. Thomas.
lu. Hugh.
IV. ROBBBT.
William de Ferrers, 7tii earl
of Derby, held Chartley in his mo-
ther's right. He sniTered from his
fkther*s infirmity, the gout. Being
unable to walk, he was driven out in
a chariot ; which, through the driver's
carelessness, fell off the bridge of St.
Neot's, March 22nd, 1253-4. He
soon d. of his bruises ; and was bur»
in Merevale-abbey. His arms were,
Vairy Or and Gu., a border Az. se-
S64
TAMWORTH
Having thus acquired the Castle of Tamworth, he
made it his principal residence. He was constituted
sheriff for the county of Stafford, in 1447, and again in
mee of horte-shoes Arg.^ By hit
fint wife, SibeU, dau. and h. of WiU.
Manhall, earl of Pembroke, he had
7 danghten. — 1. Aombs, m, to Will,
de Vead ; 2. Isabkll, m. to Gilbert
Basset, again to Reginald de Mohun ;
3. Matilda, m. to WilL de Kime,
again to Will, de Vinonia, again to
Emeric de Rnpe-Canardi ; 4. Sibbl-
LA, m, to Frands de Bohim, of Mid-
hnrst ; 5. Joan, m. to Rog. Agnilon,
again to John de Mohun ; 6. Aga-
tha, m, to Hugh de Mortimer, of
Chelmarsh; 7. Alianobb, m. to
WilL de Vsllibas, again to Roger de
Qoinci, earl of Winchester, and again
to Rog. de Leybnm. By his 2nd
wife, Margaret, dan. and coh. of
Rog. de Qnind, 2nd earl of Win-
chester by Helen, dan. and coh. of
Alan lord of Galloway, he had,
I. RoBSRT, hit successor.
u. WiL., of whom presently.
RoBBRT DB Fberbbs, 8th and
last earl of Derby, was a minor at
his father's death. He sided with
the barons against Hen. III. ; so
that, in 1266, he was deprived of
titles and estates. His lands were
conferred on Edmnnd Plantagenet,
the king's son. He d, in 1274, of
the gont, in poverty. He had two
wives, — Maria, dan. of Hngh le Bran,
earl of Angolesme, and niece of Hen.
III., 9, p, ; and 1269 Alianore, daa>
of Ralph lord Basset, living at his
decease; by whom he had a son,
John, progenitor of the family of
Ferrers, barons of Chartley. He
bore his fiither's arms without the
border.
William db Fbr&brs, 2nd son
of 7th earl of Derby, being armed
against Hen. III., was taken at
Northampton, in 1264 ; bat was par-
doned. He had grant of the manor
of Groby, co. of Ldcester, from his
mother, and assumed the armorial
bearings of her fiunily, — Gn, 7 mas-
cles Or conjoined 3 3 and 1. He
m. Helen, dan. of BCatthew lord
Lovaine, of Stanes ; whod, in 1287.
He was snooeeded by his son and
heir,
William db Fbebbbs, somnum-
ed to parEsment as baron of Groby
from Jan. 26lh, 1297, to Feb. 20th,
1325, when he d. He m. Elixabeth,
dan. of John lord 8c|grave. His aon,
Hbnet db Fbbbbbs, 3rd baroo
of Groby, was summoned to paxHa-
ment from June 5th, 1331, to Nov.
20th, 1341. He d, Sept. 15th, 1342.
He m. 1st, Isabell, dau. and h. of
Theobald, lord Yerdon; 2nd, Elisa-
beth, dau. and coh. of Gilbert de
CUre, earl of Gloucester, by Joan
dau. of Edw. I. By his 2iid wile,
he had, besides a dau. Philippa, as.
to Guy de Beanchamp.
William ob Fbbbjcbs, 4th baron
of Groby, 11 yrs. old at his &ther's
death, summoned as a baron from
March 15th, 1344-5, to Apr. 6U^
1369. He d, in 1371. He as.
Maig., dau. and h. of Rob. de Uf-
ford, earl of Suffolk ; and again Mar-
garet, dau. of Hen. de Percy, relict
of Rob., son of Gilbert de Unfran-
vile, earl of Angus. By the fiiBt»
he had,
Hbnet db Fbrbbbs, 5th baron
of Groby, d. Apr. 16th, 1357, sum-
moned from Aug. 4th, 1377, to Dec
17th. 1387. He m. Joan, dau. of
lord Foynings ; by whom he had,
William Fbr&b&s, 6th baron of
Groby, 16 yrs. old at his father's
death, summoned from Nov. 30th,
1386, to Dec. 3cd, 1441. He d. in
1444. By Philippa, dau. of Roger
lord Clifford, he had,
1. HsNBT, who M. Isi^idl, Snd dan. and
coh. of Tho. Mobray, duke of Nor-
folk. He d. V. p. learing an only dan..
EuxABSTH, of whom we ifaaU imme-
diatcly speak.
I This lays sir WlUiam Dogdale. Bat we find that, la the amis of Win. de Fer.
rariis, earl of Derby, in the nave of Westminater-abbey, the border is absent.
CASTLE AND TOWN.
365
the following year. In HSS, after the death of his wife^
Elizabeth, a new division of the lands of the last sir
Baldwin Frevile was made, bearing date upon the 5th of
u. Thomas, of whom preaeatly.
Ill, JoHW; from whom descended the
Ferieises of Mercnte, now extmct.
Elizabeth Fbrrbks, sole hdresa
of William, her grand-father, was in.
to Edward Grej, ton of Reginald,
3rd lord Grey of Rathyn ; who in her
right, became baron Ferrera of Groby;
and by that title he was sommoned
to parliament from Dec. 14th, 1446,
to Jan. 2nd, 1448-9 ; and, as baron
of Groby, from Sept. 23rd, 1449, to
May 26th, 1455. The great-grand
son of this Elizabeth, Henry Grey,
marquis of Dorset and dake of Suf-
folk, was beheaded for treason in
1554 ; and the barony of Groby then
became extinct.
Thomas Fzr&brs, the 2nd son,
m. BUMoietht nr/«r md eoheireu of
sir Baldwin F^emU, kni. He thns
acqnired the Castle and Honoub
or Tamworth. He had,
1. Thomas, who succeeded.
u. HuTBT, a knt., of Hambleton, co.,
of RaUand. nt>m him is descen-
ded the (iunily of Ferrers of Baddes-
ley.CUnton, co. of Warwick.
Thomas Fbrrbrs, b. 1422, cre-
ated a knt. in 1461. He m. Ann,
dan. of Leonard Hastings, of Kirby,
and sUter of Will, lord Hastings ;
who d. before him. His decease oc-
corred Aug. 22nd, 1498. His sons
were, Lbonard ; Ralph, dean of
the Church ; and
Joun, the eldest, who 4. v. p. He m.
MatildA, dan. of sir John Stanley, of
Elford J and bad a son.
Sir John Ferrers, knt., who
snoceeded his grandfather. He m.
Dorothy, dan. of Will. Harper, esq.,
of Rnshall-castle, co. of Stafford.
He had sereral children, of whom,
1. HuMPBKT succeeded.
n. Awn was m. to John Peto, esq., of
Chesterton, co. of Warwick.
Sir Humphry Ferrers, knight,
«. Ist, Maigaret, dan. of Tho. Pigot ;
and 2iid, Dorothy, dan. and coh. of
Tho. Marrow, and relict of Francis
Cockain. He d, in 1554 ; leaving,
by his 1st wife,^be8ides a dan.
Jane, m. at Tamworth, June 22nd,
1573, to Arthur Gregory, esq., — tL
son and heir,
John Ferrers, esq., who m.
Barbara Cockain. She d. in 1560,
and was bur, at Tamworth Ang. 12th.
It seems he re-m ; for in the register
of Tamworth is the entry that *' 7
April, 1572, was bur. Mrs. Jane
Ferrers, uz' Joh'is." By his Ist
wife, he had,
1. DoaoTBT, m. to Edw. Holt, esq.
u. HuMPHav, his successor.
m. Edwaed.
IT. HSNKT, bur, 8epL Ufh, l802.
▼. Thomas.
▼1. GaoRos, bur. July S9th, lGl6.
Humphry Ferrers, esq., suc-
ceeded his fiither, who was bur. at
Tamworth, Apr. 17th, 1576. He
in., 1562, Ann, dau. of Humphry
Bradboume, esq. ; bur. Jan. 29th,
1599. Afterwards he m. Elisabeth,
dau. of sir Ralph Longford. He was
created a knight : and was bur, Jan.
9th, 1607-8. By his Ist wife, he
had a numerous family.
I. John, his successor.
II. WiL., bur, here July 3rd, U77.
1U..1V..T. Waltse, Thomas, and Ed*
waeo.
VI. Elueabbth, m. at Tamworth, July
6th, 1585, to WUUam Somenrile, esq.
He was knighted.
Tii. KATHsaiNB, m. atTamworth, Jan.
isth, 1593.4, to Geo. Hyde, sent. He
was created K.B.
▼111. Brwobt, er. Auf, 9th, 1574 j m.
to Robert Byre. esq.
IX. Lbttick, er, Ist, bur. 4th of Sept.,
1577.
X. Susan, er, Apr. 6th, 1583; m. to
George Gresley, esq.
Sir John Firrbrs, knight, m.
Dorothy, dau. of sir John Puckering,
knt. and bart. She was bur. here
Dec. 19th, 1616 ; he, Aug. 5th, 1633.
By her, he had,
I. HuHPHar, son and heir.
II. FaANCSs, m, to John Packington,
esq. He was afterwards knighted.
III. Ann, m. here, Oct. 13th, l6l4, to
Simon Archer, Mq., of Tanwoith.
!▼. Jans, m. to sir Tho. Rouse.
Sir Humphry Firrkrs, knt.,
m* one of the daughters of sir John
B 3
366
TAMWOBTH
October. To Thomas Ferrers, then tenant by courtesy,
and to Thomas, his son and heir, were given, — ^thc
Castle and manor of Tamworth ; the manors of Lea near
Marston, Stretford near Tamworth, and Harborough-
magna, with the advowson of the church ; also the
manors of Stivichall near Coventry, of Taddington in
Herefordshire, with lands and rents in Waverton, Alles-
ley, and Mereden, in Warwickshire, and in Wigginton
in Staffordshire. To Robert Aston, son of Roger and
Joice, the manors of Ashtead and Newdigate, in Surrey;
of Becknor, in Worcestershire ; Yatesbury, in Wiltshire;
of Pinley, near Coventry ; and the moiety of the manor
of Henley-in-Arden, with the advowson of the adjacent
church of Preston-Baggott. To sir Richard Bingham,
knt., who had married Margaret, the widow of sir Hugh
Willoughby of WoUaton, in Nottinghamshire, the manors
of Middleton and Whitnash, with lands at Wilnecote;
the manor of Wyken, near Coventry, with lands and
rents within the county of that city ; and also the manors
of Grunthorpe, Lowdham, Bradford, Feme, and Maun.'
Packiogtoii. He was bur. here Not.
2nd, 1633. He had one son, and
three daughters.
John Firmers, esq., b. 1629, m.,
about 1648, Dorothy, dan. and cob.
of sir Dudley Carleton, knt. He d,
in 1680 : and was bur. at Tamworth,
Sept. 3rd. His children were,
L-u. Two INFANTS, 6«r. Aug:. 6th, 1649.
ui. Ann, ter. May 25th, l6ai.
IT. DoaoTRT, who, in 1670, was m. to
Rich. Batler, earl of Arran. Lady
Dorothy, then ** coanteas-dowaKer of
Arran in Ireland, and baroness of
Wesson, hi Hantingdonshhw,** was
bur, at Tamworth, Dec. 8th, 1710)
beinir the last of the family of Fen«n
of Tsmworth-Osstle.
T. HuMpnar,^. 1053. Hewaa lmic1it>
ed : and m. Elizabeth, dan.of Oerraae
Pigot. She survtved her husband,
resided latterly at Biamoote-hall, 00.
of Warw., and was hur, here, Aug,
90th. 1703. He was drowned in 1078,
and AtM*. Sept. asth. He left an only
dan.,
Ann Fkrrkrs, who, in 1680*
succeeded her grand-father in the
possession of the Castle and Honoor
of Tamworth. These, in 1688, she
conTeyed in marriage to Robert
Shirley.
1 Daffdale*s Warwicksh.— The only tomb of any of the Frerile-fkmUy, which we
haTe been able to identify, is that of Margaret, and of her husband, sir Richanl Bing-
ham. It lies in the middle of the chancel of the church at Middleton, and bears their
portraitures in brass. Ttom the lady's arm, hangs a rosary. Below the flgorea, is
this inscrtption, in black-letter,
CASTLE AND TOWN. 367
Thomas Ferrers died in 1458. He was then the
principal of the male branch of the Ferrerses of Groby,
and he bore his arms^ — ^vairy Or and Gu, — ^with a label
of three points Azure. He was the father of Thomas,
who succeeded to this Castle^ and of sir Henry Ferrers^
knt.^ of Hambleton^ in the county of Rutland; from
whom is descended the present family of Ferrers^ of
Baddesley-Clinton, in Warwickshire.'
Thomas Ferrers was thirty-six years old at his father's
death; and then he seated himself at Tamworth. In
1460^ he was made sheriff of the counties of Warwick
and Leicester; and also in the ensuing year. In the
wars between the houses of York and Lancaster, he took
part with the former, and signalized himself by his
fidelity to Bichard, duke of York, father of Edward IV.
But, in the battle of Wakefield, fought upon the 30th
of December, 1460, when the duke was killed and his
army routed by the forces of the queen of Henry VI.,
he was taken prisoner. He was liberated on giving his
word that he would pay a fine of three hundred marks.
When, shortly afterwards, the Yorkists gained the as-
cendance, and Edward IV. obtained the throne, Thomas
Ferrers was rewarded for his services. He was created
a knight : and received a special precept firom the king
to the barons of the Exchequer, commanding them to
give him a remittance of two hundred marks of the sum
for which he was then answerable on account of his re-
ceipts whilst he was sheriff. From 1464 until his death.
mC lACKT D'WS MCARDirS BINGHAM, MILBll, JVSTICIARIVS DB BAWCO D'Vf MBOIB, QUI OBUT
xzu DIB Mau, awko Milling CCCC lxxvj, bt d'va Mabcabkta, sua conjvxi qvob'
A*I*ABVS V*PtClB* DBU*. AMI*.
In the four quarters were once coetB of arms. Those of Fterfle now alone remain.
Dnsdale cives two more,~« ftet, for Bingham, and Bingham impaling Fterile. The
ftmrth waa loct in his time.
] Dngdale's Warwickshire.
S68 TAMWORTH
he was one of the commissioners for the conseiration of
the peace in Warwickshire ; and, in 1468, he was again
appointed sheriff of this county. In 1473, he was made
a knight of the Bath, at the creation of Richard Pkn-
tagenet, second son of the king and duke of York. He
married Ann, daughter of Leonard Hastings of Kirby,
and sister of William lord Hastings. By her, he had
three sons, sir John, who died in his fiither's life time,
and of whom little occurs, except that he was in the
king's service in Normandy, in 1475 ; Leonard ; and
Ralph, dean of the Church of this town. He died on
the 22nd of August, 1498, leaving his grandson sir John
his heir, who was son of John, and Matilda his wife,
daughter of sir John Stanley, knt., of Elford.*
Sir John Ferrers was one of the knights of the body
to king Henry VII. ; and a commissioner for the peace
in Warwickshire, from 1502 until his decease. He
married Dorothy, daughter of William Harper, esq., of
Rushall-castle, in Staffordshire; and had, besides a son,
a daughter Ann, who was married, about 1541, to
John Peto, esq., of Chesterton, in Warwickshire. He
died in 1512. By his will, he bequeathed his body for
burial within the chancel of the Church of Tamworth,
before the image of St. Editha.' It is a singular coin-
cidence that his decease took place upon the festival of
that saint. His widow survived him for many years.
Sir Humphry Ferrers succeeded his father. He
married first, Margaret, daughter of Thomas Pigot,
sergeant-at4aw ; and secondly, in 1540, Dorothy, daugh-
ter and coheiress of Thomas Marrow, sergeant-at-law,
who was the widow of Francis Cockain, esq., of Pooly.
He died on the 13th of September, 1554, in the reign
1 DuffdAle's Wanrlckshire. 3 Ibid.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 369
of Philip and Mary, leaving, by his ixst wife, a son
and heir,
John Ferrers, esq., who had married, in 1539, Bar-
bara Cockain, the daughter of his mother-in-law. He
had issue, — ^Dorothy, who married Edward Holt, esq. ;
Humphry, his eldest son and heir ; Edward ; Henry ;
Thomas; and George. He died in April, 1576.^
Humphry Ferrers, esq., succeeded on the death of his
father. He married, in 1562, Ann, daughter of Hum-
phry Bradboume, esq., of Lea, in the county of Derby ;
and towards the end of his life Elizabeth, daughter of
sir Balph Longford, of Longford.* In 1577, and again
in 1588, he was constituted sheriff of Warwickshire.'
In 1585, he was one of the justices of peace for the
county of Stafford ; and, on account of his occasionally
residence at Walton-upon-Trent, in Derbyshire, he was
one of the magistrates ordered to establish a watch
and ward around the castle of Tutbury, where Mary,
queen of Scots, lay imprisoned by the treachery of
Elizabeth.^ For his services, he was afterwards created
a knight. He had, by his first wife, a numerous family.
His sons were, sir John, William, Walter, Thomas, and
Edward : and his daughters, Elizabeth, who was married
to William Somervile, esq., afterwards knt; Catherine,
to George Hyde, gent, afterwards K. B. ; Briget, to
Bobert Eyre, esq., of Highlow; Lettice; and Susan, to
George Gresley, esq., of Drakelow, who was created a
baronet. Sir Humphry Ferrers died in January, 1607-8.*
Sir John Ferrers had been knighted, on the SSrd of
April, 1603, at Beauvoir-castle, by James I., who was
1 DugdAle't Warwickah. 2 CMtle-Inacriptions. a Burke.
4 BrdMwicke :-edit 1M4. In Mareh, 1684, the Inlwbitanta of Tunwotth paid 3».
towards tlic nudntenasce of the aoldicrs at Tatbiuy.
s Dogdale't Warwicksb. Castte Imarliitkma. Paitoh Register.
370 TAMWORTH
on his way from Scotland to London, to assume the
sceptire of England.^ When he succeeded to his fiither's
estates, the possessions of his inheritance, and their
value, are thus enumerated.'
£ s. d.
The Casile of Tamworih, with Waver-
ton-warren, Stipershill, and the demesnes
of the Castle in Warwickshire, held in
capite, 12 6 10
Lands and rents in the Warwickshire
side of the town, 18 0 0
Lea and Stretford, held of the Castle
of Tamworth, by tmknown service, IS 9 4
Lea and Marston, in Warwickshire, held
in capite, by knight's service, SO 0 9
Harborough-magna, with the advowson
of the church, in Warwickshire, held of
the duke of Norfolk, 7 0 0
Fleckenho, in Warwickshire, held of
the bishop of Worcester, 11 16 8
Waverton, in Warwickshire, held of the
Castle of Tamworth, which Edward Ferrers
had for his life, 4 17 9
Lands and rents in the Staffordshire
part of Tamworth, forming part of the
demesnes of the Castle, 5 5 0
Tettenhall-Regis, in Staffordshire, held
in capite, 5 6 0
Newborough, in Staffordshire, held of
the duchy of Lancaster, by unknown
service, 0 8 4
Glaverley, in Shropshire, held in capite, 17 4 4
1 Erdeiwlcke :--«Ut 1844. a M.S., temp. Juc I.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 371
Over and above one mill^ called Astford
mill, in the bands of tbe crown ; to wbicb
a rent was paid of 26s, 8d.
Bradford, in Sbropsbire, held in capite, 6 0 0
StivichaU, in tbe liberty of Coventry,
beld of tbe tbe crown as of tbe earl of
Cbester, 16 2 9
Of tbis sir Jobn Brat, clerk, had an
annuity of 5/. 68. 8d.
Walton-upon-Trent, in Derbysbire, witb
tbe advowson of tbe cbnrcb, beld in capite, 15 18 8
Taddington-magna, called tbe World's
end, in Herefordsbire, beld in capite, .... 15 9 7|
Orton-on-tbe-bill, in Leicestersbire, beld
of tbe lord Ferrers, by unknown service, 10 0
Hetbe, in Oxfordsbire, beld of tbe duke
of Buckingbam, by unknown service, .... 10 0 0
Magna Blounts^ called '^yng gyng geo-
berde laundre," witb tbe advowson of tbe
cburcb, in Essex; and Harford Stok, in
tbe parisb of Buttsbury, beld of tbe
marquis of Dorset, by unknown service, 36 0 0
Cbampion's priors and Joys, in Essex,
held of the marquis of Dorset, by un-
known service, 37 6 8
Ilgers, called Lachley, in Essex, held of
tbe marquis of Dorset, by unknown service, 13 6 8
Marks, in Magna Dunmow, in Essex,
beld of tbe duchy of Lancaster, by un-
known service, 20 0 0
Tbis 207. Thomas Ferrers had for the
term of bis life.
Total.... 285 IS 4i
J
S72 TAMWORTH
Sir John Ferrers afterwards wM several of the fiunily
estates, — ^Lea, Harhorough-magna, Stivichall, Orton-on*
the-hill, and the Umds in Grreat Dunmow. He was
sheriff of Warwickshire, in 1615 : and was returned as
member of parliament for Tamworth, in 1586, 1S92,
1603, and 1615. He married Dorothy, daughter of sir
John Puckering, knt and hart, keeper of the great seal
of England. He ha^ a son Humphry, bom in 1600 ;
and three daughters, Frances, Ann, and Jane. Frances
was married to John Packington, esq. ; Ann, to Simon
Archer, of Tanworth, in Warwickshire, who was
created a knight by James I., in 1624; and Jane, to
sir Thomas Rous, bart. He died in 1633, and was
buried in the chancel of the Church.^
Sir Humphry Ferrers, knt, who succeed his father,
did not survive him very long, for he died in the
autumn following. Little occurs of him except that he
resided at the Castle, whilst his father took up his abode
at the hall of Walton-upon-Trent. He was knighted
on the 6th of September, 1617, by James I., just before
the latter quitted Warwick, to which he had paid a visit :
and he had the honour of entertaining this sovereign at
at this Castle, in 1619, 1621, and 16184." He married
Ann, one of the daughters of sir John Packington, knt,
of Hampton-Lovett, in the county of Worcester; by
whom he had one son, John, and three daughters. She
survived him, and was married again to Philip Stanhope,
first earl of Chesteifield.'
John Ferrers, esq., bom in 1629, was a minor at
his father's decease. By letters patent, dated on the
8th of May, 1684, his guardianship and disposal in
1 Datdalo*t Wanrickth. 2 See pp. U9, 190, ISI.
3 Dardale's Warwickali.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 373
marriage were given to lady Ann Ferrers^ and sir
Richard Brooke^ knt. ; with an annuity of forty marks,
to be assigned by the master of the court of wards and
liveries, out of the site and capital messuage of the
manor of Lea, in Derbyshire; the capital messuage of
the manor of Bradboume, in the same county ; the manor
of Walton-upon*Trent, in the counties of Derby and
Stafford, and the manor of Tatenhall-regis, in Stafford-
shire; and divers messuages, lands, meadows, pastures,
and hereditaments, in the counties of Stafford and Derby ;
all which sir Humphry held at the time of his death,
of the crown, in capite, by military service.*
John Ferrers married Ann, daughter and eventually
coheiress of sir Dudley Carlton, knt: and quitted his
minority in 1650. By indenture, dated on the 28th of
February, 1652-3, he conveyed, the manor or lordship
of Walton-upon-Trent^ and the several houses, lands,
tithes, leasowes, pastures, feedings, woods, warrens, fish-
eries, fowlings, and other rights belonging to it; 120
acres of meadow near the river Trent, in Tatenhill,
Barton-under-Needwood, and Walton; and several other
houses, lands, and tithes, in Walton-upon-Trent, Barton-
under-Needwood, Rolleston, Shuttington, Polesworth, and
Waverton; and the advowson and right of patronage
of Walton-church; to the behoof of sir Dudley Carlton,
Matthew Carlton of Lincoln's Inn, and Thomas Carlton,
their executors and assigns, for the term of ten years,
firom the ensuing feast of the Annunciation of the
Virgin, if Ann Ferrers, his wife, should live so long:
and, after the determination of that estate, to the u^e of
himself for his natural life; without impeachment of
waste. And the Castle and honour of Tamwortb, widi
Letters patent, lO Car. 1.
c 3
374 TAMWORTH
all its rights, members, and appurtenances; and also
the three com mills and one fulling mill standing
under one roof, called the Castle-mills; and Castle-
meadow, and Mill-meadow; and several other lands,
tenements, and tithes, in Tamworth, Stretford, BolehaU,
Amington, Glascote, Wilnecote, Drayton, Bassington,
Waverton, Polesworth, and Wigginton; free warren
in Waverton and Polesworth; the manor and court
of Stipershill; the manor of Tatenhill-regis ; and the
premises in that place, in Wightwick, Compton, Mergis,
and Kingswood, he limited to the use of himself,
during his natural life, and then to Humphry Ferteis,
his son and heir apparent, and his heirs male, with
several remainders over: with the proviso, that, at any
time, he might make a demise, lease, or grant, of all
the premises,— except those limited to sir Dudley Carle-
ton for ten years, — for the maintenance of^ and the
raising of portions for, all the daughters and younger
sons of himself and Ann his wife.*
John Ferrers had only one surviving daughter, Doro-
thy. On her marriage with Richard Butler, earl of
Arran, in Ireland, second son of James duke of Ormond,
he, by indenture, dated upon the Ist of February,
1670-1, in order to provide her portion, for certain con-
siderations, granted, in trust to sir John Packington,
hart., of Westwood, in Worcestershire, and Richard
Aldworth, esq., of the middle temple, the Castle and
honour of Tamworth, and all the premises which he had
before limited to himself and his heirs male, to be by
them held for the term of one hundred years, at the
annual rent of a pepper-corn. But he should be able,
at any time to revoke the term of years by any writing
1 Indenture, i6ss.9.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 376
under his hand and seal^ after having tendered the sum
of 5«. to sir John Packington, and Richard Aldworth.
This he accordingly did, a short time subsequently^ by
a deed dated upon the 15th of Aprils 1673.
John Ferrers was returned to parliament for Derby-
shire^ after the restoration. His only son, sir Humphry
Ferrers, knt., was accidentally drowned in the Trent, on
the 6th of September, 1678, in the twenty-fifth year
of his age: he had married Elizabeth, daughter of
Gervase Pigott, esq., of Thrumpton, in Nottingham-
shire; by whom he had an only daughter named Ann.
John Ferrers, the last of the male line of the Ferrerses
of Groby and Tamworth, died the 14th of August, 1680;
leaving Ann, his grand-daughter, sole heiress to the
Castle of Tamworth.
Ann Ferrers, in 1688, became the second wife of
Robert Shirley, eldest son of Robert, baron Ferrers of
Chartley. By this marriage, the estates of the two
branches of the family of Ferrers — those of Chartley
and of Groby, — ^became re-imited, after a lapse of more
than four centuries. She died upon the 27th of Sep-
tember, 1697, leaving three sons and a daughter, —
Robert, bom on the 28th of December, 1692 ; Ferrers ;
Thomas; and Elizabeth.
Robert Shirley died on the 25th of February, 1697-8.
His father was then alive ; who, not suspecting that he
should survive all the male children of his eldest son,
obtained, in 1711, the titles of viscount Tamworth and
earl Ferrers, intending that the dignities should descend
with the elder branch of his family,— the lords of this
Castle. But Robert his grandson, then viscount Tam-
worth, died in July, 1714, unmarried. His two brothers
also died; and Elizabeth Shirley became heiress of
376 TAMWORTH
Tamworth-Castle and all the estates. On the death of
earl Ferrers, her grandiather, in 1717, she became
baroness Ferrers of Ghartley; but the Tiscountcy and
earldom, being as usual limited to males, passed to her
uncle, and thus went to a branch of the family totally
unconnected with this town. She also then became
entitled to the baronies of Basset of Drayton, Lovaine,
aud Bourchier.
Lady Elizabeth Shirley, on the 8rd of March, 1715-6,
was married to James Compton, fifth earl of Northamp-
ton ; who, in her right, became lord of this Castle. She
had two sons and five daughters. George, bom on the
6th of July, 1718, died on the 28th of November, 1719.
James, born in 172S, died in 1739. Ann died un-
married, on the 13th of March, 1735-6. Charlotte, bom
on the 8th of August, 1729, alone survived. Jane,
bom in 1732, died in 1749, unmarried. The decease
of Elizabeth countess Compton occurred on the 13th
of March, 1740-1 ; and the barony of Chartley then fell
into abeyance between her daughters, Charlotte and
Jane. But, when the latter died, the dignity devolved
upon her sister.
Lady Charlotte Compton was thus, in her own right,
baroness Ferrers of Chartley, and baroness Basset of
Drayton, Lovaine, and Bourchier. She was married, in
December, 1751, to the hon. George Towshend, son of
Charles third viscount Townshend of Kaynham, in Nor-
folkshire. By the deed of settlement made previously to
the marriage, dated in the middle of the same month,
the viscount conveyed several manors and hereditaments
in the counties of Norfolk, Suffolk, and Cambridge, to
Charles lord Comwallis and the right hon. Henry Fox,
in trust, in order to raise 20,000^. for the portions of the
CASTLE AND TOWN.
377
daughters and younger sons' resulting firom the intended
nuptials^ payable in such manner as George Townshend
should by deed direct: die possessions were to be re-
The fiunily of Townshend, of con-
nderable antiquity and great celebrity,
has been settled at Raynham, in Nor-
folkshire, from the beginning of the
12th century.
RoGBB TowNSHBND, csq. wss crea-
tedabaronetonthel6thofApril,1617.
Sir Horatio Townshend, 3rd
bart., was one of the leading mem-
bers of the Presbyterian party, during
the Commonwealth. Having xea-
lously exerted himself in the cause
of the Restoration, he was rewarded
by Charles II., AprU 20th, 1661,
with a seat in the house of lords, as
baron Townshend of Lynn-regis.
He was created Tiscount Townshend
of Raynham, Dec. 11th, 1682. He
d, in 1687 ; leaving a son, Charles,
then ten years old.
Charles Townshend, 2nd yis-
oount and baron Townshend, K.O.,
was an eminent statesman in the
reigns of Ann, Greo. I. and II. On
taking his seat in parliament, in 1697,
he first acted with the Tories ; but
he soon went over to the Whigs, and
ardently supported lord Somers. In
1702, he was named for the lord
priyy seal : and, in 1705, was one of
the commissioners appointed to treat
for the Union of Scotland. Two
years afterwards, he obtained the
post of captain of the yeoman of the
queen's guard. In 1709, he was
joint-plenipotentiary with the duke
of Marlborough for the peace of
Gurtruydenburg : and, in the same
year, ambassador-extraordinary to
the States-general of the United pro-
yinces. On the dismissal of the
Whigs, in 1710, he lost his post of
captain. When Greo. I. ascended
the throne, he was chosen secretary
of state, with power to name a col-
league. From this office he was
dismissed in 1717, and appointed
lord-lieutenant of Ireland; but he
refused to proceed into that country.
He was constituted, June 11th, 1720,
prebend of the council : and in 1721,
he was again made secretary of state.
He resided the office, May 15th,
1730, and withdrew into private life
at Raynham. He m. 1st Elisabeth,
2nd dau. of Tho. lord Pelham, and
half sister of the duke of Newcastle ;
and 2nd, in 1713, Dorothy, sister of
sir Robert Walpole. He d, June
21st, 1738, in his 63rd year. His
son, by his first wife,
Charles Townshend, 3rd yis-
count and baron Townshend, m.,
1723, Audry, dan. and h. of Edward
Harrison, esq., governor of Madras.
He d, in 1764, leaving,
I. Gborob, of whom preiently.
u. Rt. how. Charlbs, bom Ui 1735, a
distinffoished politician, who enjoyed
sevend high oinces of state. He en-
tered the house of commons in 1747 j
was appointed a lord of the admiralty,
1754) treasurer of the chamber in
1750, which he resicned next year,
bnt soon again resumed; secretary
of state, in 17O5 ; paymaster of the
forces, inlTM { and chancellor of the
exchequer, in 17M. He m, Caroline,
dau. and h. of John and carl of Ar-
378
TAMWORTH
tainded to the use of the first and other sons daring
the term in tale male^ with remainders over. And the
fiither of lady Charlotte Compton, James earl of North-
gyle and GiMnwich, and widow of
the earl of Dalkeith, eldeat eon of
the duke of Buceleach.
Gbobob Townbbbnd, JUming m.
Itdjy CkarMte Cfm^tomt mefitrtd
THB CaSTLB and HONOUB OF TaM-
woBTH. He became 4th Tifooiiiit
and baaron Townahend, in 1764 : and,
in 1786, waa created marquia Towna-
hend of Raynham. Hie lit wife <f.
l>ec. 14th, 1770 ; and he m. 2nd,
May 19th, 177S, Anne, 3rd dan. of
•ir Will. Montgomery, bart. ; and
ahe aorriTed him, nntU 1819. Thia
nobleman <f. in 1807, having had by
hia 2nd wife a nvmerooa family, and
by hia firat, —
I. Gbobob, hia aooeeaaor.
u. Chablottb, *. Oct. ISth, 17M; d,
March ISth, 1760.
m. JoBN, mentioned hereafter.
IT. CAbolinb, 4. 70009.
▼. Fbanobs, ft. March SSthj d. May
nth, 1761.
Ti. FEBOBRicK-PATBtcE, aderKymaa,
b, Dec. 80th, 1707.
▼u, Cbablbs.
▼III. SuzABBTH, who M. Hvj 7th,
1790, m^tor-reneral Will. Ixsftiu. of
Wimpole-st., London, andKUhnde,
00. Wicklow, in Ireland, colonel of
the aecond drafoon rnarda, and Itent.
of the tower of London. He tat
auccessively in parliament, ftxnn I79d
to 1818, for the boroufht of Great
YarmonthandTamworth. He tf. July
15th, 1831, havlnir had 8 sona, and
4 dans., of whom Charlotte m. lord
Charles- Vere-FenarB Townahend.
Gbobgb Townshbnd, b, Apr.
18th, 1 755, ancceeded to the baroniea
of Ferrera of Chartley, Baasetof Dray-
ton, Lovaine, fioarohier, and Comp-
ton, on the deosaae of hia mother ;
waa created earl of Leiceater in 1784 ;
and became the 2nd marquia, 5th
viacount and baron, and 7th baronet
of the family of Townahend. He m.
Charlotte, 2nd dan of £. M. Eller-
ker, eaq.,--ahe d. Feb. 2nd, 1802 :
he <f. in 1811.^ He had,
I. Gborob, b. Dec. 18th, 1778. He m..
May 18th, I807, a dan. of Will. Dann
Gardiner esq. 1 and saoceeded to the
titles of the famUy.
II. CnABi.oTTB-BABBABA,6.Jane9<(th,
1781 ; A Oct. Srd. 1807* 8h« ■I.Apr.
6th, 1808, It-col OecU Bishop, eldest
son of sir Cedi Bishop, bait., after-
wards lord Zoadi.
m. HABBiBTT-Airir *. said May, 178S,
d. Jane, 1845. She was si. March llth.
1818, to Bdwaid Fsners, esq., of
Baddesley-CUnton, co. of Warwi^
Uneally descended from the 1st no-
mas FBRers of "nunwocth-Oastle.
The issoe were, Msrmion-Bdward,
Charles, Grotoy-Thomas, OomplDn.
Gerard, Tamworth-Gcorfe, Henri-
atta-BUsabcth, Maitaret.AiiBa, and
IT. Eluabbtb-Maboabbt, *. Any.
18th, 1784} who waa si. 1815, to
Joseph Moore Bonltbee, esq.
▼. Cbablbs Vbbb *. Apr. lOth, 178S.
His lordship repcesented T^mworth
in parliament for many years - and
he now possesses hy imrchsse "
Of Twagmt
Castle and hoaoor
A recent decision of the house
of pens has dedarsd him entitted
to the difnity of eari of Leices-
ter, and consequently hereafter to
the other titles of his Cunily, on ac-
coont of irregularity in his elder bro-
ther's fkmily. Lord Charles Towns-
hend, who resides at Raynham, au,
March 94th, 1819, Chartotte, eldest
dau. of maiar-genersl WilL Loftos 1
but his lordship has no issue.
Lo&D John Townshknd, 2nd
8on of the Ist marquia, b, Jan. 19Ui,
1757, m. Apr. 10th, 1787. Georp-
ana-Ann, dan. and h. of William
Pointi, eaq., who had been deforced
from William Fawkener, eaq. The
iaaoe were,
I. AuDaT-HABRiBTT, d. Feb., 1st., 1778.
and SI., Oct lOth, 1890, to the rer.
Rob. Ridsdale.
II. Blibabbtb-Fbavcbs, *. Auc. and,
I789i and si., Oct, aeth, 1819, capC
Aufustus-Will.-James CUflbrd, R.N.
III. Isabbll-Gboroiana; b, Feb. let,
1791* and d. Sept. 17th. 1811.
IT. Javb, b, Sept. 98th. 1709.
y. Cbbalbs-Foz, b. June 98th, 179s,
and d, Apr. 9nd, I8I7, s. r.
▼I, Ann, b. Aug. Slst, 1790. and d. July
soth. 1899.
▼II. JoBN, b, Msich 98th, 1796. A cap.
tain in the Royal Navy, and heir pre-
sumptlTeof lord Charles Townshend,
his cousin. He m. Elizabeth-Jane,—
July 18th, ia09,>^ldest dau. of lord
George Stewart, of Bote: and has
a numerous fiuEdly.
▼III. GBoaeB-OsBOBNB, a deisyman.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 879
ampton^ engaged that, immediately after his decease,
Thomas duke of Newcastle, Lionel duke of Dorset, and
the right hon. Henry Pelham, or the surrivors of them,
should receive from him 12,000/., in trust, as an addition
to the portions. This sum, with the consent of Greorge
Townshend and Charlotte baroness Ferrers, was to be
invested in government or real securities, amongst which
any part of the estates of viscount Townshend should
have the preference: the interest was to be enjoyed by
the latter during his son's life, then by his son if he
survived, afterwards by Charlotte baroness Ferrers, and
then by all the younger children.
James Compton, earl of Northampton, died on the
3rd of October, 1754, and lady Charlotte Townshend
succeeded to the barony of Compton ; but the earldom
passed to her imcle Geoi^e.
George Townshend, thus, in the right of his wife,
lord of Tamworth-Castle, became, in 1764, fourth baron
Townshend of Lynn-regis and viscount Townshend of
Kaynham, in consequence of the decease of his father,
on the 13th of March. The latter, by his wiU dated on
the 16th of October previous, reciting that he was seized
of divers manors and hereditaments, in Norfolk, not
included in the settlement, devised all his landed pro-
perty to his son during his life, with remainder to
trustees and their heirs during his life to support the
contii]^nt remainders, with remainder to his first and
every other son successively in tale male, with remainders
over. And, after stating that he had paid off several
sums of money charged upon his real estates, he be-
queathed the same amounting of 24,000/. and all securities
to Edward Bacon, William S. Powell, and Philip Case,
in trust, to receive the yearly profits and place them out
380 TAMWORTH
to interest^ until a sufficient fund should be raised to
pay 4fl00l. charged on his family-estates, 9,823/. 5s.
charged on estates in Norfolk, and the iOfiOOl. directed
to be raised under the settlement of 1751. And, after
the fund should be raised and the sums paid, he willed
that all the securities should be assigned over in trust
to attend the inheritance, so that the monies might be
merged in the estates. But, by a codicil, dated on the
2nd of November, he appointed Colby Bullock to be
trustee in place of W. S. Powell.
George viscount Townshend had issue, by lady Char-
lotte,— George, his successor; Charlotte, who died young;
John; Caroline and Frances, who died infants; Fred-
erick-Patrick; Charles-Thomas-Patrick; and Elizabeth.
The decease of lady Charlotte Townshend occurred on
the 14th of September, 1770 ; and her eldest son George
became in consequence baron Ferrers of Chartley, and
also baron Lovaine, Basset of Drayton, Bourchier, and
Compton.
By deed, dated on the 12th of February, 1776, the
manors and hereditaments in the counties of Norfolk
and Cambridge comprised in the indentures of 1751 and
devised by the will; and also the Castle of Tamworth^
and the honour and manor of it; the three corn-mills
and one fulling-mill standing under one roof and called
the Castle-miUs; Castle-meadow, Mill-meadow, Secking-
ton-meadow, leaward or Castle-park, the two Strerford-
1 Copy rental and accoimt to Lady-dfty, 1777.
Total net cash raodTcd at Tuniroitli, tnm tht old astat^ to Lady-
day, I77r» «a 9 8
Ditto, flpom the n«v attate, to the aama tinw, 19ft 8 a
Ditto, flpom the new eatate, not hi settlement, t 18 u s
Ditto, at Walton, to the lame time, 634 if 11
Ditto, Bradboonie, to the same time, 381 16 le
Total jff 1483 10 3
CASTLE AND TOWN. 381
fields. Suits-orchard, and all other lands and tenements
appertaining to the Castle; all others whatsoever be-
longing to George viscount Townshend and Greorge lord
Ferrers, in Stretford, BolehaU, Amington, Glascote, Wil-
necote, Drayton, Bassington, and Wigginton; all those
belonging to the viscount and baron in Waverton
and Polesworth, and the free warren in those places ;
the manor and court of Stipershill; the manors of
Bradboume and Lea; all their messuages, lands, and
tithes, in Bradboume, Lea, Boylston, Parwich, Bentley,
Kinteton, Tissington, Hognaston, Atlow, Brassington,
Monteridge, Wicksworth, and Ashbourne, or elsewhere
in the Peake; the manor of Walton-upon-Trent, and
the advowson of the church there; and the meadow-
ground, containing 120 acres, lying near the Trent in
Tettenhill, Barton-under-Needwood, and Walton; were
limited to the use of such persons and for such purposes
as by George viscount Townshend and George lord
Ferrers should afterwards by deed jointly, or by the
latter if he survived, be appointed and directed.
Accordingly by indentures of the 19th and 20th of
March, in the following year, George viscount Towns-
hend and George baron Ferrers assigned the above-named
possessions, and other manors and hereditaments in the
coimties of Norfolk, Warwick, and Stafford, to Thomas
Beevor and the hon. Charles Vernon, to the use of
the right hon. Thomas Townshend, Richard Jackson,
and Henry Drummond, for the term of 2,000 years,
without impeachment of waste, in trust, subject to a
full yearly rent of 2,000^., to be paid to George viscount
Townshend during his natural lifcj with remainder to
Beevor and Vernon, for such persons and for such
purposes as the viscount and baron should by deed
D 8
382 TAMWORTH
appoint and direct, with or without power of revocation ;
and^ until the appointment should be made^ to the use
of the latter and his heirs male, with remainders oyer.
And it was declared that the trust was vested in
Thomas Townshend, Richard Jackson, and Henry Drum-
mond, to raise, by sale or mortgage, the sum of
7S,S00f., and another of 2,000f. to pay particular law-
charges, of which 3,300^. should be given to George
baron Ferrers for his own use, whilst the rest was to
be employed in the discharge of all debts and
encumbrances on the family-estates. And by indenture
of the 5th of April following, reciting that certain
persons had agreed to advance the required sums, —
Charles lord Cadogan, 15,000;. and lOflOOl.; Yexe
lord Yere, 20,000;. ; Thomas lord Pelham, 12,54R 1&.
6d. ; Thomas- Walley Partington and Charles Grreen-
wood, 758/. Is. 6d. and 10,000/. ; and John Willington,
7,000/., — the three trustees named in the last deed,
with the consent of the viscoimt and his son and at
the appointment of the persons above-named, transfisrred
all the property comprised in the term of 2,000 years
to Robert Drummond and Richard Cox, in trust, for
those who had advanced the money ; but with a proviso
for redemption on payment of the sums, with due
interest, by the viscount or his heirs.
George viscount Townshend was advanced to the
higher dignity of marquis Townshend of Raynham, by
letters patent of the 27th of October, 1786. On the
marriage of his daughter, lady Elizabeth, with William
Loftus, in 1790, he assigned to her, on the 26th of
April, 8,135/. 88. l^d., being her part of the accumulated
sums secured to the daughters and younger sons. This,
with 3,000/. given by him in addition, was, the next
CASTLE AND TOWN. 383
day, vested in lord Frederick Townshend and John
Wolf, in trust, for lady Elizabeth, nntil the marriage
should take place, afterwards for William Loftus and
herself or tihe survivor; and then the sum was to be
invested in government or real security for the benefit
of their issue. The remainder of the portions was,
by direction of the marquis, on the 2nd of August
following, assigned to the three younger sons, John,
Frederick-Patrick, and Charles-Thomas-Patrick. The
latter died intestate in May, 1796, having then received
2,500/. : his father obtained letters of administration
and took the remainder all but 935/. Ss. l^d.
Greorge marquis Townshend was a field-marshall ; and
attained some political dignity, being, at one time, on
the privy council, and also lord lieutenant of Ireland.
He died on the 19th of September, 1807, and was
succeeded by his son George, who, on the 18th of
May, 1784, had been created earl of the county of
Leicester,
By indentures of the 30th and 81st of May, 1811,
for specified considerations, Thomas lord Walsingham,
Robert Blake, and John Robins, who had become
trustees, by the direction of the second marquis Towns-
hend, and with the approbation of the numerous persons
to whom the sums raised had become due, released
and confirmed to John Smith and Francis- Williams
Sanders, all the manors, lands, and other heredita-
ments, of which the marquis was seized in the counties
of Norfolk, Cambridge, and Derby, to hold in trust, to
complete certain contracts for the sale of part of the
hereditaments ; and, out of those not already contracted
for disposal, to raise, by sale or mortgage, so much in
aid of the purchase-monies as would suffice to pay several
S84 TAMWORTH
sums mentioned^ according to their respectiye priorities,
with due interest, and all expences. Amongst these sums
were, — SOfiOOl. due to Edward-Miller Mundy, originally
lent by Yere lord Yere; 6,000/. due to Frances and
Frances-Dorothy Fumivall, the money unpaid lent by
lord Cadogan; 8,135/. 8s. l^d. due to Robert Orme
and Harrington Hudson, as trustees acting under the
marriage settlement of lady Elizabeth Townshend ; 935/.
88. l^d. due to Ann dowager marchioness Townshend
as personal representative of lord Charles-T.-P. Towns-
hend; 8,135/. 88. l^d. due to lord John Townshend;
10,000/. due to Charles Greenwood; 758/. 7». 6d. due
to Andrew-Berkley Drummond, Charles Drummond, and
John Drummond, originally advanced by Tho.-W. Par-
tington; and 7,000/. due to Thomas Willington, which
had been lent by John Willington. John Smith
and Francis-Williams Sanders were to hold such
hereditaments as should remain unsold, in trust, for the
marquis, his heirs, and assigns. And A.-B., C, and
J., Drummond, then trustees, assigned over to Richard
White all the premises comprised in the indentures of
March, 1777, except those in the counties of Stafford
and Wanvick, to hold during the remainder of the term
of S,000 years, in trust, for John Smith and Frands-
W. Sanders, to attend the inheritance.
Greorge, second marquis Townshend married Charlotte,
second daughter of Ellerker Mainwearing Ellerker, esq.,
of Risby, in Yorkshire; and coheiress of Roger her
brother. By her, he had several children, — Greorge-
Ferrers, Charlotte-Barbara-Ferrers, Harriett- Ann-Ferrers,
Elizabeth-Margaret-Ferrers, and Charles- Yere-Ferrers.
He died upon the 28th of July, 1811. His will was
made on the 19th day previous. After having given many
CASTLE AND TOWN. 385
specific legacies, and bequeathed to Frances Warcup,
spinster, his personal property at his mansion in Sloane-
street, and at Richmond in Surrey, with all his lands
and hereditaments at the latter place freed from encum-
brances, he devised the rest of his personal property
to lord John Townshend his brother, and Robert
Blake, in trust, to be conyerted in money; which, after
the payment of his debts and funeral expences, should
be invested in the purchase of freehold or copyhold
estates, to be applied as he ordered his real estates to
be, except certain uses directed to be limited to his
half-brother, lord James Townshend, for life, and then to
the first and other sons of him successively in tail male.
And the marquis devised to lord John Townshend and
Robert Blake all his real estates not before disposed of,
upon trust, that they, as soon as might be convenient,
should, by sale or mortgage, raise so much money in
aid of the personal property assigned to them as would
suffice to pay his debts, legacies, and frmeral and
testamentary expences. The estates not disposed of
they should hold in trust, during the life of lord
Charles Townshend, in order to preserve them. They
were to apply the rents, — to pay all taxes, rates, and
other outgoings for the estates whilst lord Charles
lived, — to keep in repair the mansion-houses at Rayn-
ham and Tamworth, — to pay the salaries of stewards
and bailifb, — and to pay, during the term of twenty-
one years, an annuity of 4,000/. to lord Charles. They
should invest the surplus of the rents, with the profits
of the timber, upon government or real securities ; and
the dividends being added, they should allow the money
to accumulate during the term. After the expiration of
the twenty-one years, lord Charles Townshend should
386 TAMWORTH
receive the whole of the rents ; and, after hiB decease,
they should pass to his sons according to age, in tail
male, with remainders over.
Very soon after the decease of the second marquis,
serious disputes arose amongst the trustees of the estates
and the other persons interested in them. Appeal to
the high court of Chancery resulted. In one cause,
lord John Townshend and Robert Blake were plaintifb;
and George third marquis Townshend, lord Charles
Townshend, lady Harriett Townshend, lady Elizabeth
Townshend, and lady Arabella-Ferrers Townshend, and
Charles-Fox, John, and (}eorge-Osbome Townshend,
infiuits, by their guardian, and lord James-Nugent-
Boyle-Bemardo Townshend, were defendants. In the
other cause, John Smith, Francis- Williams Sanders,
lord Frederick Townshend, lady Maria-Honoria Towns-
hend, the hon. William Blaquiere and lady Harriett his
wife, and John Robins, were plaintifb; and Edward-
Miller Mundy, Frances-Dorothy Fumivall, Robert Orme,
Harrington Hudson, lord John Townshend, Charles
Ghreenwood, Andrew-Berkley Drummond, Charles Drum-
mond, John Drummond, Thomas Willington, Richard
White, Samuel Taylor, sir James Montgomery bart.,
Richard Dewing, Frances Grwyn, Anthony Gwyn, Gwyn
Etheridge, William Stokes, Robert Blake, lord Charles
V. F. Townshend, and Charles-Fox Townshend, John
Townshend, and G^rge-0. Townshend, by their guar-
dian, Edward Ferrers and lady Harriett-Ann his wife,
lady Elizabeth Townshend, lady Arabella Townshend,
lord James-N.-B.-B. Townshend, Ann dowager mar-
chioness Townshend, Frederick duke of Leeds, and
Greorge third marquis Townshend, were defendants. By
a decree of the court pronounced in the two causes
CASTLE AND TOWN. 887
on the Ist of February^ 1814^ it was declared that the
trusts of the indentUTes of 1811 ought to be executed ;
and it was decreed that the will of the late marquis
should be established and the trusts of it effected.
Acting in compliance with these indentures^ by
agreement of the Uth of March ensuing^ lord John
Townshend and Robert Blake^ with the consent of lord
Charles Townshend^ and in subjection to the sanction
of the court of Chancery^ agreed to sell to John Robins,
for 94,700/., including timber, the Castle of Tamworth
and the honour of the Castle, and several manors,
lands, and other hereditaments, and the furniture of
the Castle and of the Moat-house, and all the other
possessions of which the marquis had died seiz^ed in
Tamworth, Bolehall, Wilnecote, Fazeley, Wigginton,
Glascote, Bitterscote, Waverton, and Amington. And as
the late marquis was indebted to Mr. Robins 26,000/. on
mortgage, besides a considerable amount on simple con-
tract, it was agreed that the purchaser should retain
that sum, and pay the remainder in the name of the
account-general of the court of Chancery to the credit
of causes, on or before the 5th of April, 1815. On the
6th of August, it was ordered by the court that the
trustees, by sale of the estates, should raise 122,700/.
to liquidate all the debts, and that the contract for the
sale of Tamworth-Castle and the possessions aboye-named
should be carried into effect.
In August, 1816, it was found that the first encum-
brances on the estates were the principal sums consequent
upon the trust of 1790, amounting to 25,341/. 128. 6d.;
and the second, raised under the trusts of 1776 and
1777, to 42,758/. Is. 6d. By different orders of the court,
these were soon paid; so that, on the 4th of August,
TAMWORTH
ISn, the parties to whom these sums had heen due
quitted all claims upon the Castle, honour, manors,
lands, tithes, and other hereditaments situated in the
counties of Warwick and Stafford, and all comprised
in the indentures of 1777, to Richard White and his
assigns during the residue of the S,000 years, upon trust,
subject to such charges, if any, mentioned in the inden-
tures of 1811, for lord John Townshend and Robert
Blake, to be by them disposed of from time to time,
but in the mean time to attend the inheritance, in order
to preserve the same from mesne charges and encum-
brances, if such should exist.
Mr. Robins was put into possession of the Castle and
estates contracted to be sold to him, and of the receipts of
the rents, on the 5th of April, 1815 ; but many diffi-
culties arose, so that the transfer could not be completed
by the specified time. Upon his petition, an order of
the court was, therefore, made, on the 20th of July,
1816, directing lord John Townshend and Robert
Blake to convey to him certain lands and houses in the
town and parish of Tamworth to the value of the debt
of 26,000^.; freed from all encumbrances. To get rid
of these, Mr. Robins, on the 26th of August ensuing,
at the request of the trustees, paid to certain bankers in
London 2,085/. Ids, bd. principal and interest due from
the late marquis, who as security had given the title-
deeds of some houses in Bolebridge-street and Church-
street ; and to John-Broadley Wilson, 3,949/. is. 8d. for
principal and interest in discharge of a mortgage for
3,500/. on the Bolehall estate. And on the 21st of
January, 1819, Mr. Robins petitioned the court that
with the hereditaments he had mentioned others might
be assigned to him, the value of which altogether did
CASTLE AND TOWN. 389
not exceed 39,684/. lis. 7d. This was the debt now
due to him, — 26,000/. on mortgage, with interest from
the 2Snd of September, 1810, amounting to 7,407/. 1^.
6i/., after the deduction of property-tax and 2,600/.
already paid to him; 2,085/. 19«. 5d. paid to the
bankers, with interest from the 26th of August, 1816,
amounting to 242/. 28.; and 3,949/. 9^. 8c/. On the
following day, an order was made consonant with the
petition: and, by indentures of the 19th and 20th of
February, lord J. Townshend and K. Blake conveyed to
Mr. Robins and his trustee the specified hereditaments.
These hereditaments were as follows. The manor of
Bolehall and Glascote; the capital messuage called
Bole-hall, and several parcels of land belonging to
them, and the Bow-mill, estimated to contain altogether
150a., all which had formerly been the estate of Samuel
Egerton, esq., afterwards of George viscount and first
marquis Townshend; a messuage and lands contiguous
of 14o. Sr. 24p.; closes called the AUports of 16a. 3r.
SOp. ; several closes formerly part of an open field called
Further field, but long since enclosed ; other lands taken
out of an open field called Middle field ; and others out
of another open field called Merry-hill field; the Over
and Nether pieces in a meadow called the Oxhays,
containing together 2a. 16p. ; a dole in a meadow
named Broadmeath; Well-croft of la.; and two cot-
tages with gardens; — all which together contained 82a.
2r. 28 ., and were, with Merry-hill close of 5a. 25p.
and a piece of waste land adjoining, neither included
in these indentures, formerly the estate of Isaac Hawkins
Browne, and afterwards of the second marquis; seven
closes called the Grreat and Little Hopleys, New Close,
and Stone-pits, of 80a. 2r. 4., with bam, garden,
£ 3
390 TAMWORTH
orchard, and rick-yard, belonging once to John Willing-
ton, afterwards to the late marquis; and the tithes of
all these possessions, — ^which lay in the liberty of BolehaU
and Glascote. Two pieces of the Castle-meadow, each
containing 2r. ; several closes lying together eastwards
of Fazeley-bridge, containing 15a. Sp,; two pieces of
land forming the south part of Great Park, and the
whole of Top-close, containing t<^ther 16a. Sip, ; all
lying in the liberty of the Castle : two cottages fronting
the Fazeley road, and three gardens and Cam's croft
behind of Sr., in the liberty of Fazeley; all which
possessions in the Castle-liberty and in Fazeley were
formerly parts of the estate of Greorge viscount Town-
shend, commonly called lord Northampton's, or the
Castle estate. A piece of land out of Spittle and Flax-lull
fields of 41a. 2r. Sip., and an old enclosure of 3a. Ir.
87p., awarded to George viscount Townshend by the com-
missioners under the enclosure act of 1771 ; a messuage
and garden in Wigginton; and another old enclosure;
all in the liberty of Wigginton. Several buildings
lying behind the houses on the south side of Market-
street, and extending to, but exclusive of, the Castle-wall ;
a messuage on the same side; two messuages on the
east side of the road leading to the Castle, with
part of the Castle-court walled off; all in the Castle-
liberty and borough : two messuages on the south side
of George-street; another messuage, in the same part,
with a garden down to the river; another at the comer
of this street and Bolebridge-street ; one adjoining in
Bolebridge-street ; and another messuage on the south
side of Market-street : all which had formed part of lord
Northampton's or the Castle estate. Part of the site
of a messuage in George-street, by the Barley-market ;
CASTLE AND TOWN. 391
five messuages^ four with gardens down to the Anker^
in Bolebridge-street ; a messuage^ with a garden^ on the
opposite side of the same street; three messuages on
the north side of Church-lane^ with a garden or orchard ;
one^ on the north side of Church-street^ with a walled
garden; one^ with a garden^ on the south side; one^
with gardens^ in Colehill^ opposite the east end of
Greorge-street ; one^ in Gungate^ with an orchard
adjoining; two more^ with a garden, in the same part;
and a cottage and garden here ; six messuages, and five
cottages and one shop, with gardens, in Lichfield-street ;
and the moiety of a messuage, formerly divided into
four dwelling-houses, in Silver-street, on the east side;
and another messuage in the same street : all these had
been purchased by Greorge viscount and first marquis
Townshend, from different persons. A messuage on the
west side of Bolebridge-street ; and six messuages, in the
same part, with Tenter croft behind them, which had
been converted into gardens.
There was still a considerable sum amounting princi-
pal and interest to 22,379/. 15«. lid, due to Mr.
Robins from the estates of the late marquis Townshend.
On the 22nd of March, 1820, it was ordered that he
should complete the contract of March, 1814, and, on
or before the first day of the ensuing Trinity-term, pay
the residue of the 94,700/., deducting off the remaining
debt. On the 1st of June following, he accordingly paid
82,635/. 11^. 6d. into the bank of England, in the name
of the accountant-general of the court of Chancery,
to the credit of the causes.
But the matter was not yet settled. In the last debt,
Mr. Robins had included 1,527/. 13^. expended, at the
desire of lord John Townshend and Robert Blake, and
392 TAMWORTH
also of lord Charles Y. F. Townshend, in purchasing
books^ part of the late marquis's personal estate sold
by Frances Warcup, on the S9th of May, 1812, and
751/. 65. in purchasing furniture sold by her, on the
6th of July, which had belonged to Raynham, and 71L
4s. 9d. for repairing the latter, and sending all to
Raynham, with 769/. 8«. 8d. due on the first two sums
as interest to the 29th of July, 1819. Exception was
taken to the interest: and it was ordered that Mr.
Robins should pay interest for the purchase-money, at
four per cent, since he had been let into the possession
of the estates, in 1815.
Instead of 769/. Sa. 8c/., a sum of 289/. U. 4d. was
allowed for interest to the 5th of April, 1815. Mr. Robins
had paid on the 6th of December, 1819, to Robert Blake,
999/. 10s. for interest on his purchase-money; on the
25th of December, to Joseph Vincent and Ann Fenton,
571/. 10s. in discharge of money lent to the late
marquis on mortgage of two houses in Lichfield-street
included in the contract ; and on the 4th of July, 1820,
2,210/. 8s. Id. due to certain bankers in London fix)m
the estates of the marquis. Taking all these sums into
account, there remained due from Mr. Robins, proper
deductions being made, 251/. 10s. 2d. and 13,987/. IO5.
Sd. These sums he settled on the 26th of January,
1821; but he was again charged interest on the 18,987/.
IO5. Sd., from the 16th of December, when the last
account was made. The amount, 61/. 19s. Id., he
paid on the 14th of February following. The purchase
of the Castle and estates was now effected. Accordingly,
by indenture of the 28th of June, 1821, lord John
Townshend and Robert Blake completed the contract of
sale ; and thus the Castle was, for the first time during
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 898
almost seven-huiidred years^ alienated from the family
of its hereditary possessors.
The property now passed to Mr. Kobins^ was as
follows. The Castle of Tamworth, with the buildings^
yard^ court-bath^ plantation^ and garden^ containing
altogether 8a. 2r. 16p. : the honour and manor of the
Castle : the manor of Stipershill : and all rights belong-
ing to them. The Castle-inn facing the Holloway
and Market-street^ with buildings and yard extending
to the Castle-wall. A piece of ground^ with buildings^
converted into a bowling-green and gardens^ lyiug on
the west side of Silver-street^ containing altogether la. Ir.
S7p,, and formerly called Hill-croft. A dwelling-house
in Market-street, adjoining the Castle-inn ; two dwelling-
houses on the south side of Geoi^-street, one formerly
the Angel-inn, with gardens down to the Anker: these
lay partly in the borough and partly in the Castle-
liberty. In the Castle-liberty: — Seckington meadow of
8a. Sr. 28p. : Castle-meadow of 12a. Sr. l^P* •' a
plantation of 12p.; an ozier-bed of Sr. 1^.: Park
meadow of 5a. SOp. : parcels of land formerly constituting
the Leawood-parks/ — ^Lower park piece of 4a. 2r. 34p.,
Aqueduct piece of 5a. 3dp, Lower park of Sa. 5p.,
Crreat park meadow of 18a. Ir.y two pieces of Sr.
I8p. and Sa. 3r. 1^. Lower park piece and Upper
park piece of 2a. 5p. and la. Sr. SSp., two closes of
2a. Sr. 19p. and 3a. 28p., two closes called Upper park
dose and Lower park piece of Sa. Ir. S5p. and Sa. Sr.
Sp., Park close of 6a. Sp., Great and Little coal-pit
closes of 6a. Sr. 22p, and 4a. Sip. ; arable land of Za.
9p. : two pieces of meadow called the Horse closes of
1 Hie lands named fhe parks which lay within the liberty, once formed an eztenslTe
park belonfing to the Castle. This remained in the time of Henry VIII. i for Leland
mmtioaahia hftving passed it on the left, aa he proceeded from TMnworth to Ffcietey.
394 TAMWOETH
8a. Sr. 27p. and la. IQp. : parcels of land once fonning
Brick-kiln close, — ^a piece of Ir. ISp., another of 4a. 2r.
98p., and a third of Sa. Ir. Z7p.: a bam with yards
and meadow called the Barn-piece of S2p. and 10a. 3r.
4p. : part of the Bull's head inn and garden of Sp. : lands
once constituting Nearer Priestley fields, being situated
south of the Watling-street, — ^a cottage and piece of
land of SQp., Aldridge's piece and a hovel and yard of
Sa. ir. S7/9. and IQp., Great Brick-kiln close of 4a. ir.
18p., the Five acres of 4a. 2r. S9p. : Hilly piece, once
part of the Further and Nearer Priestley fields, of 5a.
ip. : Snell's orchard of 9a. Ir. SQp. : waste land adjoining
the Tame of Ir. I6p. : Fazeley-bridge dose of la. Sp. ;
Nether Thistly field of 7a. 2Qp. : nine pieces of meadow
formerly part of Further and Nearer Priestley fields, —
Brick-kiln close of 2a. ir. 85p., Further Thistly field of
6a. 16p., the Little meadow of ia. 8r. 7/?., Hilly piece
of 8a. 8r. 5p., Lower Bam close north of 4a. Ir. 9p.,
Lower Bam close south of 8a. 8r. SQp., Upper Bam
close south of 3a. Ir. 28p., Upper Bam close north and
a newly erected messuage, with a bam, and yard of ia.
ir. lOp. and Ir. 4p., Coal-pit close of 4a. ir. 26p.,—
on these all the moduses or annual payments in lieu of
tithes were to be charged to which all the lands in the
Castle liberty had been subject, amounting to 1/. 6#.
6d., of which lis. 6d. was paid to the prebend of
Amington, 4s. to that of Coton, and the rest in equal
sums to the prebends of Wilnecote, Syerscote^ and
Wigginton : several closes formerly the two southernmost
of those four called the Further Priestley fields, — a
plantation of Ir. ilp.^ arable land of 11a. 5p., pasture-
ground of 7a. 8r. 19p., two plantations of 9p. and ir.
iSp., a paddock of 36p., and two gardens of 3r. S4p.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 395
and 12p.; a plantation of 2a. 26p.; all lying near
Dosthill-house. The Castle-mills heretofore described
as three Corn-mills and one fulling-mill under one
roof, the former with three water wheels, the latter
with one wheel working two pair of fullers for fulling
cloth, and another wheel for calendering and printing
cotton-cloths, all now used exclusively as corn-mills;
with land and premises of Ir. 14p., of which 19p.
comprising the mill-house and part of the mill lay in
the liberty of Fazeley, the rest in that of the Castle;
and land called the mill-dam, with flood-gates, of
la. 2r. IQp. In the liberty of Fazeley : — the site
where two mills under one roof, called the Lady-
mills, anciently stood on the bank of the Tame, at a
place named Endall ford, with the bays and banks to
the old mouth, and the water and fishery of the old
mouth as descending to Lady-bridge, and the fishery
from Lady-bridge to Dunstall, — which mills and fishery
were subject to an annual fee-farm rent of 10/. paid to
the lord of the manor of Drayton-Basset, but out of
which the land-tax should be deducted: Mill meadow
of 12a. lip., Mill holme of ^a. 8r. 7p., waste ground
of Ir., East Endall close and a piece of garden of 3r.
Sp. and I2p., a portion of Endall closes now converted
into part of a wash-wheel cut of Ir. 89p., West Endall
close and garden of 8r. lip. and 15p., Nether close of
la. 2r. 8p., and piece of waste ground of Ir. 2Qp., — all
appurtenant to the Lady-mills and fisheries: Bitterscote
close of 3a. ^P* ; three parts of Thatch-holme meadow
of la. 15p., ^p., and 85p. Several closes, including a
dwelling-house and gardens, of 13a. 17^., with the
tithes, situated in the lordship of Amington, and called
the Ashlands. Koyalty close of 2r. 4p., in Drayton-
396 TAMWORTH
Basset. A croft of la. in Wareton or Waverton. The
Castle and all the other hereditaments before described^
except Fazeley-bridge close, had formed lord Northamp-
ton's or the ancient family estate. In the borough of
Tamworth, — the Moat-house, and its appurtenances, with
two cottages, and a bam partly converted into a surgery
and tenement; two dwelling-houses, with gardens, in
Bolebridge-street ; two messuages and a malt-house, two
dwelling-houses and four messuages, with gardens, in
Church-street; one dwelling-house, in College-lane;
another with gardens, in Greorge-street; five dwellings
with gardens, and a messuage, in lichfield-street ; three
messuages with two shops and gardens, and four
dwelling-houses, in Market-Street; garden ground of
la. Ir. S9p. east of Ludgate-lane : three enclosures
called the Bradfords of 8a. Ir. 15^., 4a. Ir. I2p., and
la. Sr. S2p. ; and three enclosures called Broad-meadow
of 8a. 88p., la. 2r. 89p., and la. Ir. S8p. ; — aU tithe
free and situated partly in the borough and partly in
the lordship of Wigginton: the Perrycrofts, in the
lordship of Bolehall, with a house and croft, two
gardens, and four crofts of la. Sr. 18p., Ir. 88p., SSp.,
Sa. 19^., 8a. 2r. 85p., 2a. 2Qp., and 8a. Ir. 20p. : all
which had been purchased by Greorge viscount and first
marquis Townshend. All the tithes and ecclesiastical
payments whatsoever, hitherto due to the prebend of
Amington, for the lands in Amington and Bolehall.
In the borough: — Garden-field or Fenton's garden of
7a. Ip.y near the Bradfords, exonerated from land-tax
and tithes ; a dwelling-house, with garden, on the south
side of Church-street ; two houses built on the site of
the Bowling-green house, and four others, with a
garden of 2a., formerly a bowling-green and garden,
CASTLE AND TOWN. 897
on the north side of lichfield-street ; an ancient mes-
suage in lichfield-street^ converted into four distinct
dwellings^ with gardens^ and another messuage and
garden ; five dwellings on the Lichfield-road^ and Bam-
close and two small gardens of 2a. 8r. 25p.; all free
from tithes and land-tax. And thirteen pews in different
parts of the Church.
Mr. Robins^ who thus acquired this extensive property^
was an eminent auctioneer in London. Some parts of
the estate he soon disposed of^ but the greater portion he
retained until his decease in 1831. By his will, he
bequeathed all his property to his children for life, and
then to his grand-children. But between them some
dispute arose, which ended in a suit in the high court
of Chancery. After some time, it was ordered by a
decree of the court, that the Castle should be disposed
of, with all the hereditaments in and around Tamworth.
The property was, therefore, divided into one-hundred
lots, and put up to public auction, on the 10th, 11th,
and 12th days of October, 1833.'
Most of the lands were soon sold to numerous persons,
and the estate thus broken up; but the Castle did not
find an immediate purchaser. At length, it was bought
by the trustees of lord Charles Vere Ferrers Townshend:
and it thus once more returned into the £unily of its
hereditary possessors.
1 SwAppeadU, Note 97.
F 3
THE CASTLE:
CONTINUED.
DESCRIPTION.
There are found very scanty vestiges of the Qiiginal
Castle. The greater part of the edifice has long dis*
appeared^ and little more remains than the mound and its
superencumbent donjon. From the few notices of the
ancient building which exist, it appears to have exhibi-
ted the arrangements generally adopted by the Normans.
It had its keep, its walls of the enceintCj its base-court,
its mound and donjon, and its ditch.
The principal part of the Castle lay eastward of the
mound towards the Market-place. The entrance was
situated in the lane now leading into the grounds. The
Normans rarely constructed regular gate-houses; but
they erected two towers near each other, and formed a
gateway between them. Such would seem to have
been the case here. The foundations of one of the
round towers remained exposed at the close of the last
century. The keep appears to have formed a part of
the circuit of the walls on the east side : the site is
taken up, partly by the Castle-garden, and partly by
the yards and out-buildings of adjacent houses. All these
parts gradually fell into decay during the fifteenth
century, so that, when Leland visited this place, they
had totally fallen into ruins. "The Base Court," he
says, "and great Ward of the Castle is cleane decayed.
GASTLB AND TOWN. 399
and the Wall fallen downe^ and therein be now but
Houses of 6ffice of noe notable Buildinge/'^
Of the walls of the enceinte^ very little can be traced.
There is a very massive curtain-wall^ which passes from
near the spot where the tower of the entrance once
stood^ to the donjon upon the sununit of the mound.
It has, however^ been very much lowered^ so that the
summit forms a path^ protected by modem side-waUs,
to the present Castle: this ascent is considerably less
steep than the mound itself^ as the site of the ancient
keep is placed on a much higher level than the base
of the mound. This wall presents a very beautiful
specimen of herring-bone masonry. In it is occasionally
found the red tile.^ This style of architecture was
occasionally used by the Romans^ and afterwards by
the Normans; but it was most generally adopted by
the Anglo-Saxons. It is a point not agreed on^ whether
this wall at Tamworth should be referred to the Saxons
or Normans: equally high names might be mentioned
on either side of the question. The mound is similar
to those of both these people ; but history refers its
formation to the former: and the wall must be as old at
least, as it is most probably founded so deep as the
mound is artificial; because the newly-placed earth
would not possess the solidity, — at least for many ages,
—which would be required to support the ponderous
masonry.'
The south side, feeing the rivers, was, in all likeli-
hood, protected by a wall, with a bank of earth behind
it affording an easy access to the top. From this, a
1 Itln., Tol. IV. fol. 189. b.
a An enfrarinf of fhU maaonry la given in the •'Glossary of Ardhitectan".
s On the north side, it had become so unsafe, that some years ago it was fonnd
Bcoessary to tnpport It by massive stone bttttmses.
400 TAMWORTH
west wall very probably ran to join the donjon.
Another surrounding the mound, and continuous into
the north side, would complete the circuit of the Castle,
and enclose a quadrilateral area of ground a little more
than two acres in extent.
The base-court contained, as was always the case,
the garrison-lodgings and offices.
The mound is of considerable height ; and is between
forty and forty-five yards in diameter at the top. It is
not wholly artificial, for its elevation was increased by
excavating a fosse partially around its base, through a
natural elevation of the ground. This is particularly
evident on the east and west sides. On the north, the
trench formed a part of the Castle-ditch. The only
remnant of the ancient donjon is the base of the pre-
sent tower, which is of very great thickness, and built
of rubble-stone. It is probably founded as deep as the
herring-bone wall: and, if examined, might be found
to contain subterranean chambers. The present Castle
has been erected upon the ancient site; yet its found-
ations, in some parts, are remarkably shallow. The
mound was crowned by a light multangular shell of wall
for greater defence, the remains of which are now seen,
although the greater part has been modernized. Leiand
says, ''The Dungeon Hill yet standith, and a great
round Tower of Stone, wherein Mr. Ferrers dwelleth,
and now repaireth it."*
A ditch surrounded the Castle on three sides, whilst
the rivers on the south completed the defence. It
appears always to have been a dry ditch: and, whilst
the edifice was &lling to decay, it was cultivated as gar-
dens. On the ISth of March, 1459-60, Thomas Ferrers,
1 Itin., loc. ctt.
CASTLE AXD TOWN. 401
esq., granted to Thomas Croflia% weaver, and Juliana
his wife, on a lease of forty-three years from the 19th
of May ensuing, a piece of land in the Castle-ditch,
seventy-two feet long, and extending in hreadth from
the land of the lord king to the Castle-wall. For this
was to he paid the sum of 18d. a year, at the usual
term of the Castle-courts. And Thomas and Juliana,
their heirs and assigns, were to keep in repair all the
buildings erected or to be erected on the land.'
The full breadth of the ditch, has evidently been
about twenty feet. It has become gradually filled up ;
and the greater part is now built upon. From the
north-west angle to the bank of the Tame, scarcely a
trace remains, although but few buildings stand upon
it. On the east side, it is much more apparent, from
the bank of the Anker until its approach towards the
top of George-street, where houses begin to obstruct its
course. Little more than ancient records can demon-
strate its course parallel with Market-street
The present Castle is situated entirely upon the
donjon-mound. Down to the reign of Charles II., it
constituted the chief residence of its owners, who, from
time to time, introduced alterations and improvements.
Humphry Ferrers, in Elizabeth's time, resided alternately
here and at Walton-hall, in Derbyshire. Sir John
afterwards rebuilt a considerable part: towards the end
of his life, he retired entirely to Walton, and gave up
this residence to his son and heir, sir Humphry. John
Ferrers, esq., dwelt at Walton whilst this place was
garrisoned by troops in the civil war; but afterwards
he returned, and continued mostly here until the close
of his life. Whilst the Castle was held by the Shirleys
1 Indenture, 36 H. VI.
402 TAMWOETH
and Comptons, it was totally neglected; and remained
deserted for nearly a century. Internally it fell into
a state of great delapidation ; but it was maintained in
external repair. The day of desolation was at length
consummated; by its conversion into a manufactory.
Mr. Peel took it for part of his works. The great hall
was turned into a smith's shop. Yet the only per-
manent damage which the building sustained, was
confined to the destruction of the old floor of the hall,
and the substitution of a modem one. About 1792,
Mr. Peel abandoned the place. The late marquis
Townshend, when he was earl of Leicester, contemplated
its conversion into his family residence. With this
design, he had it carefully surveyed; but, on account
of the decayed state of the greater part, and the neces-
sarily heavy expences which would be incurred by the
restoration, he was obliged to abandon the scheme for
some time. After he had succeeded to the titles and
estates of his family, in 1807, he commenced the most
extensive alterations and repairs. He erected the lodge at
the entrance into the grounds from the lower end of
Lady-bridge bank. The gardens were newly laid out,
and the mound was planted. Parts of the interior
of the building were re-erected, the ancient high-peaked
roofs removed, and others of a modem character put up.
Had this nobleman lived longer in possession of the
edifice, he would have rendered it a very fine residence.^
1 The mArqnis Townahend was exceedini^r fond of thli CtsUe. He lued to
dedue that he was never so proud as when he stood within the rates. Indeed, the
titles which accompanied It Into his ftimily were many and very lUaatrtoos. One time,
he accompanied the late prince of Wales on a visit to Warwick-castle. He took
the opportunity of stating to the prince how dellflrhted he should be to reoelTe a visit
from his royal highness In his Castle of Tamworth. Perchance, he nryed the sub-
ject In a manner which was not perfectly agreeable. The prince tamed round and
exclaimed hastily, " D— -n your Castle." The marquis never renewed the invltatioa,
or forgot the Indignity ofltoed to himself. . He used to relate tiie anecdote with mudi
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 403
The death of the marquis^ in 181 1^ stopped the
progress of the repairs. The Castle remained empty for
some years; but at length it was fitted up in an
excellent manner^ by Mr. Robins^ as a residence for his
son-in-law^ Thomas Bramall^ esq.^ It continued to be
inhabited by this gentleman, until the property was
sold; by a decree of the court of Chancery. After it
had come into the hands of the trustees of lord Charles
Townshend, it continued to be unoccupied. But, in
1844; it was taken by Miss WoUerstan, late of Elmore
Court; near Gloucester^ as her residence. This lady has
caused it to be thoroughly repaired at great cost; and
furnished in a style of splendour suitable to the character
of the building; and to its dignity in olden times.
The present Castle is of an oval or rather of a
multangular form. The outer walls are very massive;
although in the greater part of them are not presented
the features of antiquity. They are entirely built of
stonC; embattled at the top; and; where the galleries
ruu; are furnished with loop-holes. The only access to the
interior of the building lies on the east side; and is by
a small; pointed; ancient doorway passing under the
warder's house into the court-yard. The grooves for
the portcullis may be still seen. The court-yard is small;
Uttemen, not munlnf led with raipriae that tach an occonencs oonld posiiblj have
The malediction of such a person as the late prince of Wales,~we allude to him
strlctlj In his prirate capacit]r,-^has taken Its fall effect. In the manner that mi^ht
be JQStlj expected. Bver since the memorable period, the Castle has been gradnallj
emerfins from the degradation which it had longr snitared, and rislnir from the niins
to which neglect and scorn had reduced it.
1 Ifr. Robins boilt the lodge which stands dose to the site of the old tower near
the lane leading from the Market-place. During its erection, an ancient stalrcastf
beneath the surface of the ground was opened. The builder had neither the curiosity
to examine were it led to, or the courtesy to inform any person who would have
explored it, of his discovery } but he had it immediately dosed over.
A small portion of a odlar attached to an a4}aoent house, is fiormed of an andent
404
TAMWORTH
and is bounded on the east by the warder's house and
the tower, on the south by the external wall, and on
SaU «f Tttt
the west and north by the principal portion of the
edifice.
A great part of the warder's house has been rebuilt of
brick. Internally there are some tolerably good rooms,
but none of these lie on the ground-floor. They appear
to have been fitted up in the time of the Tudors, if we
may judge firom the style of one of the chimney-pieces,
which is handsomely carved. The windows facing the
court-yard exhibit an ordinary character; those facing
the east, which are divided into several lights, having
been rebuilt in modem times.
Adjoining the warder's house is the tower, a large
square structure. At the base, the walls aie very
thick, and are built of rubble-stone, according to the
CASTLE AND TOWN. 405
Anglo-Saxon and Nonnan modes; above they axe much
thinner, and formed of hewn stone, indicating that the
greater part of the tower has been re-erected. A passage
from a small modem wash-house communicates with a
dismal room, thirteen feet square, and unprovided with
any fire-place or window, which is traditionally called
"the dungeon,'' — a purpose for which it was very
probably destined. Above this, are some staircases con-
nected with the main building; and, at the top, a large
lumber-room, with windows at the sides, most of which
have been entirely bricked up. The view from the
leads is very fine, but it is not so extensive as that
from the tower of the Church.
On the north wall of the court-yard, are seen some
chimney-pieces, where the late marquis Townshend
b^fan to erect additional rooms.
In the south wall, stands a doorway leading by a
flight of steps into a small recess, lighted by a loop-hole
from without. Thence the passage appears to have
been continued aroimd the walls, whibt a branch
turned to the left. But these have been bricked up,
doubtless at the time when the great rooms of the Castle
were rebuilt. At the top of this wall, a gallery runs
from the warder's house to the main buildings.
The entrance into the principal part of the edifice is
placed opposite that into the court-yard from the exterior.
It is ornamented with Corinthian pillars, and bears
above, carved in stone, the arms of Ferrers; but the
whole is very much mutilated and decayed. The porch
is provided with stone seats. All the south part, in-
cluding the porch and the two adjacent kitchens with the
rooms above, was erected in the reign of James I. It
is built of brick, with stone dressings.
g3
406 TAMWOBTH
The kitchens have been completely modernized inter-
nally. Above them are two very fine zooms, which
fonned the principal apartments of the Castle. They
are wainscotted with dark stained oak, carved and
ornamented in a mixture of the Roman and Griedan
styles. Along the cornice of the largest, around three
sides, are placed numerous panels containing the arms
of the Ferrers' family, of the lords of the Castle down
to the late marquis Townshend when he was earl of
Leicester, of Ferrers of Chartley to the Comptons, and
those of Ferrers of Baddesley-CUnton to the time of
James I., impaling the matches of these fiunilies. Under
each of the arms, is an inscription stating the particular
marriage.^ In the smaller room, are six similar panels,
showing principally the matches of the sisters of sir
John. These were put up when the rooms were built
by sir John Ferrers, and continued at subsequent times.
As they possess antiquarian value, we give the whole of
them.'
1. On a wreath Or and Ghi., an unicorn Enn.,
armed, maned, and queveed of the first. On each side,
a horse-shoe Sa.
HBRX FOLOWBTH TBB COATBS OF ARMBS AY'tIBNTLT BOB'b
IN T> NA'b of FBRRBB8, WITH AN ABSTRACT OF 8VCH HOWSBS
& AV'tIb't FAMILIB8 AS HAVB SINCB THB CO'qVBST BBBNB
LTNIALLT DISCB'dBD FRO' HBNRT DB FBRRIBR8, LORD OF
FBRRIBR8 IN NORMA'dT, WHO CA'b IN TO BNO' WITH WIL*
T* CO'qVBRO', & TOOKB HIS FIRST DBNONMIATION FRO* THB
SAID TOWNB CALLBD FBRRIB8, LYING IN T* DVKBDOMB OF
NORMANDIB.
S. Arg., three horse-shoes Sa.
1 To these insoiptioni, we hare oocaaiomJly nkgnd is snllioritiee, in tbe Itistonr
of the Cutte.
3 In some of the earlier panels a fisw errors wfll be observed.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 407
THX F0R8AID BBN* L* FBB* BAD OBYS' Hi' T* Bo'nOR OF
TVTBVBT BY w' Co'q:.
3. Arg.j six horsenshoes Sa., S^ 2, and 1 : impaling
Sa., three bars yairy Arg. and Gu.
BOBBBT 1. B : FBR : MA' 8IBBLL d' OF W : L : BBY8B OF BB'bXR
KNAPB & QOWBB.
4. Vairy Or and Gu., a border Arg.^ charged with
eight horse-shoes Sa. : impaling quarterly, Gru, and vairy
Or and Sa.; over all a lion rampant Arg., armed and
langued Gu.
W : BBLB FBB : L : OF TVTBVBT MA' MABOABBT d' & HBIB TO
W: PBVBRBL.
5. Vairy Or and Gu. :^ impaling Sa., three garbs Or.
W' FBB : FIB8T B : OF DBBBT MA* AONIB 8I8TBB & COHBI'B TO
RA' 3. B : OF CHB8TBR.
6. Ferrers? impaling Gu., seven mascles conjoined
3, 3, and 1, Or.
W' FBR : 2. B : OF DBRBT MA : MAROARBT DA : & HBl' OF
ROOBR QVINCT B : OF WIN'.
7. Ferrers: impaling Gu., semee of billets Or, a
fess Arg.
W' L: FBB: OF GROBT MA* BLBNOR DA' OF MATHBW L:
LOVAl' OF 8TANX8.
8. Ferrers: impaling Sa., a lion rampant Arg.
W' 2 L : FBR* OF OROBT MA* BUZ' DA* TO ZOBN L : 8BORAVB
OF CALBDO'.
9. Ferrers: impaling Or, a fret Gu.
HBNRT 3 L. FBR* OF OROBT MA* I88ABBLL DA* OF TBBOBALD
LORD Vb'dON.
10. Ferrers : impaling Sa., a cross engrailed Or.
w' 4 L : fbr' of orobt ma' marga' da' of w* vfford of
8VFF0LKB.
1 These are the usual anns of Ferrers, and most be ondentood whenerer we
mention the name merely.
408 TAMWORTH
11. Ferrers: impaling barry of dz Or and Az, a
bend Ghi.
BBNRT 5 L : FSa' OV OBOOBT UPOY, lANB DA* : TO LTCAS
Loan POTMl'OBS.
12. Ferrers: impaling chequy Or and Sa., a fess Gu.
w' 6 l : fsb* of oboobt mabibd philip na* to bogbb l :
cufpo'db.
18. Ferrers : impaling Frevile.
b' tuo'ab fbb : of Tik'woBTH ma' buz' nA : & COHBIB to s'
BALDWl' FBBYILL.
14. Ferrers: impaling Arg., a manche Sa.
s' THO : fbb' of tamwobth mab : ann da' to willia' l :
HA8TINOB8.
15. Ferrers: impaling Arg., on a bend Sa. three
bucks' heads caboesed Or ; a crescent Ghi. for a difference.
b' iohn fbb'bbb of tam : ma' mayob da' to b' iohn bta'lbt
of blfobdb.
16. Ferrers: impaling Arg., a lion rampant within
a border engrailed Sa.
b' iohn fbb : OF tam' ma : dobothib da' to wil : habpbb
OF BYSHALL.
17. Ferrers: impaling Sa., three pickaxes Arg.
S' HYMFBBT FBB : OF TAM ' MAB* MABOABBT DA ' TO THo'
PIGOT 8A : AT LAWS.
18. Ferrers : impaling Arg., three cocks Gu., armed
ppr.
IOHN fbb' of tam : BBQ' BBP0Y8BD BABBABA OA' TO
fbay'cib COCKIN.
19. Ferrers: impaling Arg., on a bend Gu., three
mullets Or.
b' hy'fbbt fbb : of tamwobth mab' an' da' to 8 ' hy'fbbt
bbadbybnb.
20. Ferrers : impaling paly of six Or and Ghi., OYer
all a bend of the first.
CASTIiB AND TOWN. 409
s' nVvRBT WWB. : ma' to hib 2 wtfb bliz' da : to b' aavfb
lo'qm fordb of lo'.
21. Ferrers: impaling Sa.^ a bend of lozenges be-
tween two plain cotises Arg.
B' IOHN FSB : OF TAM' ma' DOROTHIB da' to S : lOHN
PVCKBRl'o L : KBBPBR.
22. Ferrers, with a label of three points Gku : impaling
party per cheyron Sa. and Arg., in chief three mullets
Or, and in base three garbs Gu.
HUMP^ FBR', BON & HBR OF V IOHN, MA' ANNB D' OF 8^ IOHN
PACKINGTON, BAR^ : BHB AFTBRW^ MARRBD PHIL' BARLB OF
CHBBTBRFIBLD.
28. Ferrers: impaling Arg., on a bend Sa., three
masdes of the first.
lOHN FBRRBBS OF TAMWORTH BON & HBR MARBD ANNB
DATGHTBR & COHBR OF 8^ DUDLBT CARLBTON^ K^. HB DIBD
MDCLXXX.
24. Ferrers : impaling Az., a bend engrailed between
six martlets Or.
a' BUMFRBT FBRRBR8 OF TAMWORTH K^., BON & HBR, DIBD
BBFOBB HIB FATHBR : HB MARRBD BLIZ. DAYO' OF GBRVABB
PIGOTT OF THRUMPTON, IN COM : NOTTINGHAM, BBQ'.
25. Paly of six Or and Az, a canton Ermine and
label of three points Gu. : impaling quarterly, 1st Ferrers,
2nd Ferrers of Groby,* 8rd Frevile, 4th vairy Arg. and
Az., a fess Gu. firetty Or. — ^Marmyon.
ANNB, ONLY DAVO' & HBR OF tF HUMFRBY FBRRBRB, MAR-
RIBD ROB^ 8HIRLBY, BLDB8T BON & HBR OF ROB^ BARL
26. Quarterly, 1st and 4th Sa., a lion passant
guardant Or between three helmets Ar. — Gompton ; 2nd
and 3rd Arg., within a border Az. charged with eight
bezants, a chevron Sa. : an escutcheon of pretence,
1 Hie BUM urms as tlioie of Qninci, earl of Wtocherter.
410 TAKWORTH
quarterly, lit paly of six Or and Az., a canton Er-
mine— Shirley, Snd Ferrers, 3rd Ferrers of Groby, 4th
France and England quarterly in a border Ai^. — ^Thomas
of Woodstock. Impaling arms similar to the escutcheon
of pretence.
BLIZ., ONLT DAVQJ^ & HBia OF ROB^ BHIRLBT & ANNB rBBRBES,
MARBIBD IAMBS COMPTON, FIPTH BARL OF NORTHAMPTON.
27. Quarterly, 1st and 4th Az., a chevron Ermine,
between three escallop-sheUs Arg. — ^Townshend; 2nd
and Srd quarterly Gu. and Or, in the first quarter a
mullet of the second — Yere. An escutcheon of pretence
of six quarterings, 1st Compton ; 2nd Thomas of Wood-
stock; Srd Shirley; 4th Devereux; 5th Ferrers; 6th
Compton.
QBOROB, YISCOUNT T0WN8HBND, CRBATBD MARQUIS TOWN-
8HBND 27^ OCTOBBR, 1787, B8CAMB LORD OF THIS CASTLB IN
RIGHT OF HIS WIFB, CHARLOTTB BARONB88 DB FBBRAB8,
BOURCHIBR, LOVAINB, BA8SBT, & COMPTON, ONLT DAU'r &
HBIR OF JAMBS BARL OF NORTHAMPTON & BLIZABBTH BARO-
NB88 DB FBRRAR8, &C.
28. Twenty-four principal quarterings. 1st Towns-
hend: 2nd Vere: Srd Compton: 4th Shirley: 5th
Basset of Drayton: 6th Az., a lion rampant hetween
eight cross-crosslets Or: 7th Devereux: 8th Ferrers:
9th Arg., five horse-shoes Sa: 10th Bourchier: 11th
Lovaine of Staines : 12th Or, a lion rampant Az. : ISth
Thomas of Woodstock: 14th Bohun: 15th Ferrers of
Groby : 16th Gu., a cinquefoil Ermine : 17th Az., a lion
rampant Arg: I8th Or, three piles Gu. : 19th Scotland :
20th Az., a cross flory and five martlets Or : 21st Frevile :
22nd Mannyon : 2Srd bendy of six Or and Az. : 24th
Arg., a saltire engrailed Az. An escutcheon of pretence
quarterly, 1st quarterly 1st and 4th Vert, a fiet A^.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 411
and chief Gu.; Snd and Srd Arg.^ two bars Gu.: 2nd
Ralph earl of Chester: Srd Az., a wolf's head erased
Arg., langued Gu. : 4th Arg.^ an eagle displayed Sa.
OBOROB TOWNSHBND, BABL OF LBICB8TBR, BARON DB FBB-
RAR8, BOURCHIBR, LOYAINB, BAS8BT, & COMPTON, IN THB
RIGHT OF HIS IIOTHBR, LORD OF THIS CASTLB, IIARRIBD
CHARLOTTB 2^ 8I8TBR & COH' OF ROGBR MAINWARING
BLLBRKBR, OF RI8BT, CO. BBOR.
29. Vairy Or and Gu., a canton Ermine — ^Ferrers
of Baddesley-Clinton : impaling Sa., on a chevron Arg.,
three slips of broom ppr.
S^ BDWARD FBRRBR8 MA* CO'bTA'cB DA' & HBIR OF NICHOLAS
BROOMB.
50. Ferrers of Baddesley: impaling Arg., a saltire
Gu., between four eagles displayed Sa., armed Gn.
hbnrt fbrrbbs of baddbblbt ma* kathrinb da : of 8 :
10 : ha'pdbn.
51. Ferrers of Baddesley: impaling Gu., a saltire
Arg., between twelve crosses crosslet Or.
BDWARDB FBR' : OF BADB8LBT BBq' : MA* BRIDGBT DA* : OF
WIL' L : WINDZOR.
32. Ferrers of Baddesley : impaling Or, three hawks
ppr., armed and membered Gn., in a border charged
with twelve bezants.
HBNRT FBR : OF BADBSLBT BSQ* MA* lANB DA : & HBIR OF
HBNRT WHITB.
33. Ferrers: impaling Az., a bend Arg. cotized Or,
between six lions rampant of the last.
ROBBRT FBR' B : OF DBRBT B8P0VBBD HBLANOR : DA* OF
hvm' BOHVN.
34. Ferrers : impaling Gu., a lion rampant Or, Tvith
a label of three points Gu.
412 TAMWOBTH
lOHN L : rBftRBBS OF CHABTLST MA* AYICB DA : & HXIRB OF
Ro' mrcso'oa.
35. Ferrers : impaling^ — .
ROBIKT L : FBRRBB8 OF CHABTLBT.
36. Ferrers : impaling Or, a chevron Ghi.
lOHN I. : FBBBBB8 OF CH4BTLBT BSP' BUZA : DA : TO BAFB
BABLB STAFF*.
37. Ferrers: impaling quarterly, Ai^. and Gu., in
the £nd and Srd quarters a fret Or; over all a bend Sa.
BOBBBT . L : FBBBBB8 OF CHABTLBT MA* MABOA : DA : TO BD'
L: SPBNCBB.
38. Ferrers : impaling Ou., three roaches naiant Arg.
BDMT'd . L : FBBBBBS OF CHABTLBT MA* BLANOB DA* TO
8' THO. DB LA BOCH.
39. Ferrers: impaling — .
will' L : FBBBBBS OF CHABTLBT MA* MUZ I DA* TO S' ADAM
BBLKNAF.
40. Arg., a fess Ou., and in chief three tcvteux:
impaling Ferrers.
s' wa' dbyobax, l : fbb' in bight of aonis HIS WTFB, da'
& hbi' of w : L : fbb :
41. Devereux: impaling Arg., a cross engrailed
Ou. between four water-bougets Sa.
8' lOHN DBYBBBTX L : fbb' of CHABT' m' CICBLT RBIBB TO
hb' bovbchb' b' of bs*.
42. Devereux: impaling Barry of six Arg. and Az.,
in chief three torteaux, a label of three points.
8* WALTBB DBVBBBVX VISGOV*T HBBBFOBO MA* MABT DA* TO
tho' OBAT.
48. Devereux: impaling Hastings.
S' BICHABD DBVBBBVX MA* DOBO' DA* TO OBOBOB HASTl'oS,
B: OF hv'ti'odo*.
44. Devereux: impaUng Az., crusily of crosslets, a
cross moline voided Or.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 41S
WALTBB S : OF B88BX L : FSB' OF CHAB : MA* LBTICB DA* TO
8IB F&AV'CIS KNOYLBS.
45. Devereux : impaling paly of six Ai^. and Sa.^ a
fess Gu.
BOBBBT B : OF BBSBX L : FBB' OF CHAB* B8P : FBAv'ciS DA* TO
8* FBAV: WALSi'gHA'.
46. Shirley: impaling arms of six quarterings, Ist^
Devereux; 2nd Ferrers; Srd Bourchier; 4th Loyaine of
Staines ; 5th Thomas of Woodstock ; and 6th Bohun.
LADT DOBOTHT DBVBBBUX, 2^ DAYO' & COHBB OF BOB^ B : OF
B8BXX, MABBBD S' HBNBT 8HIBLBT OF 8TAYNT0N BABOLD, IN
COM : LBICB8TBB» BABONBT.
47. Shirley: impaling Ermine^ on a chief Arg.^
three torteaux.
S' BOB^ SHIBLBr OF STAUNTON, 80N & HBIB OF S' HBNBT,
MABBIBD KATHBBINB DAYO' OF HUMFHBT OKBOYBB, OF 0KB-
OYBB, IN COM. 8TAFF0BD, B8Q'« HB DIBD MDCLYI.
48. Six quarterings^ 1st Shirley; 2nd Basset of
Drayton^ Srd Devereux ; 4th Ferrers ; 5th Bourchier ;
6th Thomas of Woodstock: impaling Arg., two bars
and in chief three mullets Gu.
8^ BObS only SUBYIY'g SON & HBB, WAS SUM'on'd TO FABL^
AS lA FBBBI OF CHABTLBT &C. MDCLXZYII, CBBATBD BABL
FBB" & YI8Ct TAMWO^ MDCCXI, MAB<^ BLIZ : D' & HBB OF
LAUBBNCB WASHINGTON, o'd 1717.
49. Shirley: impaling quarterly, 1st Ferrers; Snd
Ferrers of Ghroby; Srd Frevile; 4th Marmyon.
BOB^ SHIBLBT, BLDB8T SON & HBB OF BOB^ LOBD FBBB" MAB^
annb only dauo'^ & hbb of humfhby fbbb" of tamwobth.
d'd bbfobb his fathbb, 1698.
50. Arms similar to those in the 26th panel.
BI.IZ% ONLY DAUO'^ & HBB OF BOB^ SHIBLBY, BUCCBBDBD HBB
OBANDFA' in THB BABONT of FBBBBB8 OF CHABTLBY &C. :
MABBBD IAMBS COMPTON FIFTH BABL OF NOBTHAMFTON.
51. Quarterly, 1st Compton ; Snd and Srd quarterly,
H S
414 TAMWORTH
Ist Shirley, 2nd Ferrers, 8rd Ferrers of Chroby, 4di
Thomas of Woodstock; 4th Arg., in a border Aje.
charged with eight bezants, a chevron Sa.
likMBS LORD COMPTON.
LADT lANX COMPTON.
LADT ANNB COMPTON.
LADT CHARLOTTB COMPTON.
5S. Devereux: impaling Gu., a bend between six
cross crosslets fitch€ Arg.
BOBBRT B : OF BSBBX L : FBB : OF CHA* MA : FRAT'cIS DA : TO
T^ B : OF 8UFF0LKB, WHO DIBD WITHOUT IBSI7B.
Over the chimney-piece are three panels, each con-
taining three escutcheon pendent from a rose-tree ppr.
53. No. 1. Or, three piles Gu. — ^David earl of Angus :
impaling the earl of Chester as in the 5th panel.
No. 2. Or, a saltire and chief Gu., — ^Bruce : impaling
David earl of Angus.
No. 8. Sa., a lion rampant Arg., crowned with an
earPs coronet, — ^Alan earl of Galloway : impaHng David
earl of Angus.
DAVID BABLB OF AN0VI8HB & HVNTINODON, ORAVND CHILDB
OF DAVID KINOB OF 8COTB8, HAD T8BVB BT MAVDB SIBTBB
AND COHBIRB TO RANDOLPHB THB 3 : BABLB OF CHB8TBB»
I8SABBLL, & MABGABBT: ISSABBLL MA' TO BOBBBT LORDB
BRV8B, AND MABOARBT BSP0V8BD ALBN BABLB OF OALOWAT.
54. No. 1. Bruce : impaling David earl of Angus.
No. 2. Or, a fess chequy Arg. and Sa., — Stewart:
impaling Bruce.
No. 3. Scotland.
THB SAID BOBBBT LOBDB BRVSB AND lANB ISSABBLL HIS
WTFB HAD IB8VB BOBBBT FATHBR OF ROBBBT BBV8B KINGB
OF SC0TB8 ; WHICH KINOB HAD TS8VB MARION THAT B8POV8BD
WALTBR 8TBWABD, THB PATBBNALL PBOGBNITOR OF ROBBRT
CASTLE AND TOWN. 415
BBYSB ; XIMOB OV BOOTS, VBOll WHOM OIBOBNDITH K^ IAME8
0TB 80VBBI0NB.
55. No. 1. Alan earl of Galloway: impaling David
earl of Angus.
No. S. Quinci : impaling David earl of Angus.
No. 8. Ferrers: impaling Quinci.
THB SAID ALBN BABLB OF GALOWAT AND LADT MABOABBT
HIS WTFB HAD T8SYB BBLBN Ma' TO ROOEB QVINCIB BABLB
OF WINCHB8TBB, WHO HAD TS8VB MABOABBT HIS BLDB8T
DAYOHTBB AND COHBIBB, MABIBD TO WILLIAM FBBBBB8
SBCo'd BABLB OF DBEBT ; OF WHOM LINBALLT DISCBNDITH
lOHN FBBBSB8 OF TAMWOBTH, NOW LBTVINGB.
In the smaller room.
1. Gu.^ two chevronells Arg. : impaling Ferrers.
8' OBOBOB HTDB, KNIGHT OF THB BATH, MA* KATHBBINB DA*
OF 8^ HTM : FBB :
2. Arg.^ on a fess between three annulets Gu., as
many leopards' heads of the first: impaling Ferrers.
b' WILLIAM SOMBBVILL MA* BLIZABBTH DAVOHTBB OF S'
HVM : FBB : OF TAM :
8. Yairy Ermine and Gu. : impaling Ferrers.
OBOBGB OBB8LBT OF DBAKBLOWB BBQ* MA* 8VSAN DA* OF 8*
BVM' FBB*.
4. Arg., on a chevron Sa, three quatrefoils Or:
impaling Ferrers.
BOBBBT BTBB OF HIOHLOWB BSQ' MA' BBIOBT DA' OF s'
HVM' FBB*.
5. Barry of six Arg. and Az., in chief three tor*
teaux : impaling Ferrers, with a label of three points.
b' BDWABD GBAT ma' BLIZABBTH FBB*, IN WH08B BIGHT HB
WAS L. FBB' of OBOBT.
6. Ferrers of Baddesley: impaUng, quarterly, 1st
and 4th Gn. ; 2nd and 8rd Sa. a fleur-de-liz Or. Over
all a bend Arg.
416 TAlfWOBTH
8* HXNET VBE' OP CBILBBMORB. 3 SON'B OP S' THO' PUl* OF
TAU', mV llAEQ4RBra HXCKBTALL.
The chinmey-pieoe in this room is very fine, being
carved in oak in an elaborate and beautiful manner.
The details are mostly Grrecian. It is so large as to
reach the ceiling, being thirteen feet high. It is sup-
ported at the sides of the fire-place by Corinthian
pillars. On the right above, is the figure of a man;
on the left, a woman and a child: standing arrayed
in the Roman costumes. In the centre, is a coat
of arms, containing twelve principal quarterings of the
Ferrers' fiunily down to sir John, in James's time;
with the motto "only one." Around are six small
panels. One of these bears the representation of Jupiter
drawn in a chariot by eagles. Another represents a
dragon at the foot of a tree, evidently intended for
the monster Ladon that kept watch over the golden
apples in the garden of the Hesperides. A third seems
to refer to the punishment of Prometheus, inflicted on
him by Jupiter for presiuning to form men of clay, and
animating them by the sacred fire which he had dared
to steal from heaven itself. He is depicted as lying
upon the ground, whilst in the tree above the torment-
ing vulture feeds on his liver, ever growing even whilst
plucked by the voracious bird firom his side. The
other three panels represent the tragic fate of the
beautiful Adonis, with whom Aphrodite or Venus
had left Olympus to dwell. In one, he stands by
the chariot which awaits him, whilst his mistress
vainly attempts to dissuade him from joining in the
fatal chase. In another, he stands in the midst of his
dogs, with the wild-boar. And in the last, he lies slain
by the infuriated animal, and the dogs stand around his
corpse.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 417
The windows of these two rooms^ oyerlooking the
country on the south side of Tamworth^ consist of many
lights. This front of the Castle was re-fiEu^d with
stone and repaired in 1783.
Over these two rooms, are numerous chambers. One
of them leads to the gallery which passes to the war-
der's lodge; and another to the gallery on the west
side of the edifice.
Beyond the two kitchens, is a small back yard, in
which is the Castle-well. It is of considerable depth,
as it passes through the mound to a level with the
river. It appears to have been thoroughly modernized,
at least so far as we could ascertain.
The great hall is almost entirely built of brick.
It possesses a high-pitched roof, with finely carved
timbers; but the hand of time has deprived them of
much of their beauty. From the hall, the two
principal staircases lead, one into the south rooms, the
other into those on the north side. The steps of the
latter are formed of solid blocks of wood.
On the north wall of the haU, were once depicted in
fresco, two gigantic figures; whilst the legends below,
SIR LANCELOT DE LAKE, — SIR TARQVIK,
proclaimed the subject of the piece. They were repre-
sented as tilting together, just as they are described to
have done in the old romance of ''Morte Arthur".
The painting, however, was white-washed over so as
to be scarcely discernible. In 1783, its obliteration
was completed by the application of a second coat of
white-wash.^ The wall is now wainscotted half way
1 GcnUanan*! Magmslne, 1784. In fhU inTtlnable work, at the same date, is
mcntianed an old octangular table which then remained in the Outle. Aroimd the
margin, this inscription was cot rvry deep in the solid oak,— pbatss awd olobt
AJIO WTSDOMS AND THANKS AMD HOVOR AND rOWMMM AND MTOBT BS TNTO OUaS
, MIW. 1564.
418 TAMWORTB
up; and it is probable that the painting is wholly
destroyed.^
The large kitchen behind the hall was erected by
the late marquis Townshend, in the place of sereral
rooms which had become greatly delapidated. It is a
common brick structure, with an ordinary roo£
The north rooms are older than any other parts of
the interior of the Castle. The wall separating them
from the rest of the building, runs from the angle of
the tower to the west side of the Castle, and is almost
wholly built of stone. This part consists of three stories.
On the ground-floor are cellars, originally only separated
into two, but partitioned off into many. They are
entered by doorways from the great kitchen, the hall,
and the court-yard. The one connected with the
kitchen is alone provided with a window. The second
story contains three rooms. Of these the middle one is
the largest. Its broad fire-place, its old carved chimney-
piece, and its two deep-bayed windows, with stone
balconies, present the same general architectural features
as the warder's house. From the east room, an addi-
tional flight of stairs leads to the rooms above. The
third story contains numerous chambers, which were
erected by the marquis Townshend. One communicates
with the gallery of the western wall. At the opposite
end, a staircase conducts into the lumber-room, and
then passes to the summit of the tower.
Some wordt at the end wen wanting, as that part of the table bad been broken and
the piece lost. In the centre, was the horse-shoe, with the arms of Feners.
The table, we believe, has been destroyed.
1 Tliere is a ballad circulated in Tunwoxth, girms an acooont of the combat
between sir Lancelot and sir Tarqoin,— the latter of whom had imprisoned many of
the knights of king Arthur's round table in this Castle,~in Lady-meadow. No part
of this celebrated and interesting romance can be referred to Tsmwoath. Hie baQad
is an ingenions imitation of the ancient one, commenchig,
" When Arthur first in court began,**
which may be seen in Percy*s ReUques of Ancient Soglish poetry.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 419
The Castle continues to be a iioble building. Its
commanding position^ its situation amidst the trees of
the well-planted mound, and its ivy-coyered walls, give
it the aspect of an interesting and venerable edifice.
There are many and great incongruities in the style of
the internal buildings, yet these can hardly form a
subject of deep regret, as great changes alone, by
adding to the place the conveniences of a modem resi-
dence, have alone preserved it from total destruction.
Certainly a little more adaptation to the original plan
might have been observed, without omitting any comforts
required in the present state of society. But it is
pleasing to reflect that the building does not exhibit
the moumftil aspect of very many of our ancient military
and ecclesiastical structures, now lying imder the ban of
desolation. The prominent features of the Castle still
present a sufficient memorial of the great Champions
who once held it, and derived from its possession one
of their proudest dignities. The mighty bard of the
north, who sang, in long and pleasing strains of the
brave but vicious hero, the
« ■ Lord of Fontenajey
Of Lntterward and Scrivelbaye,
Of Tamworth tower and town."
when he visited this place,^ was highly gratified with
1 sir Waller Scott paid a yidt to TamworihpCastle in the eailypazt of the year 1828.
Mr. Bramall and liia family were greatly dinppointed at not baring known of the pre-
tence of so eminent and popolar a writer. His name waa only diKoyered by the
riiitora' book. Mr. Bramall, when shortly after in London, wrote to inylte him to
pay another yisit to the Gastla. Sir Walter Scott retomed the following answer.
" Sir,— The nmneroos ayocations of this place hare prevented hitherto my
retaining yon my sincere thanks for your kind invitation to Tamworth Castle ; of
which I sincerely felt the polite kindness. I had great pleasiire in seeing the line old
Tower, and should have i^oiced to see the possessor.
My retom, as it tskes me to the cast side of the idand, wQl not permit [me] to
accept of your very obligmf oflner to receive me at Tamworth.
I am. Sir,
34 Sussex place, Your obliged hnmble Servant,
s« April. [1838.] Waltbr Scott."
420 TAHWOBTH
the venerable building. Perchance, as he paced the
noble hall; he recalled to his mind his own lines,
where he describes the Scottish monarch, James, as
suggesting that,
II jf wiOan TimtaUoii ttroiig,
Hie good Locd Xannlon tazriei long,
Percfaanoe our meetiBg next may lUl
At Tamwortfa, In his caide-hiOL"
Well did the haughty Marmyon reply,
''Hnch honoured were my hvmble home,
If in iti haDi King James should oome ;
But Nottingham has archers good,
And Yorkshire men are stem of mood ;
Northnmbrian prickers wild and mde.
On Deihj Hilla the patha are steep ;
In Onse and Tyne the forda are deep,
And many a banner will be torn,
And many a knight to earth be borne.
And many a sheaf of arrows spent,
Ere Scotland's Ung shall cross the Trenf
Yet, before a century had rolled by, Scotland's king,
a weak yain pedant, did cross the Trent, without blood-
shed or opposition. Soon, too, he feasted and revelled
in this very Castle, to which his predecessor is
represented in the pleasing romance as threatening so
hostile and unwelcomed a visit.
THE TOWN WALLS.
The outer fortifications of the town consisted of a
broad dry ditch^ inside of which was raised a high
embankment crowned by a defensive wall. They were
of considerable extent^ including the whole of the
present town^ except about nine-tenths of lichfield-
street, the part of Gimgate north of Aldergate-street^
and a very small portion of Bolebridge-street. With
the Tame and Anker^ which formed the fourth side
and completed the defence on the souths they enclosed
an area of ground ahnost but not perfectly square ; for^
on account of a bend in the latter riyer, the east and
south sides were longer than the rest^ and the north
was rather shortest of all. It seems that the wall^
without the bank and ditch^ was continued parallel
with the Tame from the extremity of the western side
to the Castle. The posterns or bars^ affording exits
from the interior^ were situated in Ladybridge-street or
the HoUoway^ Lichfield-street^ Gimgate^ and doubtless
Bolebridge-street^ although we have not expressly found
a bar recorded there.^ The part of the fortifications
from the north-west angle to Lichfield-street obtained
the name of the Walfiirlong^ being about one eighth
of a mile in length ; and some land parallel to it was
called the field of the Walfurlong.' It is curious to
remark in the existing lanes^ how paths were formed
1 Frotebly there ww a pottem at the preeent SchooDunue-lane.
2 Court RollB, etc.,
i3
422 TAMWORTH
close around the fortifications^ from postern to postern,
affording ready communication from the town to all
the surrounding fields. From lichfield-street bar,
Wybume-lane ran down to the bank of the Tame; at
the extremity of which a path by the river seems to
have communicated with Lady-bridge. Another lane
passed northwards from the same postern, and joined
one from Gungate bar. A path ran eastwards from
the latter, joining Perrycroft-lane, which through the
Dead-lanes passed to Bolebridge-street bar.
We cannot ascertain precisely by whom these exten-
sive bulwarks were erected. The general form exhibits
so great similitude to the camps constructed by the
Romans, that only the want of direct historical evidence
on the point has prevented us from maintaining our
firm conviction that Tamworth was once a Roman
station, and one of considerable importance. OfiiEt, when
he fortified the town, and erected his palace here, very
probably took advantage of the foundations of the old»
structiire, and re-formed the ditch ; which, even to these
days, has retained the name of Offa's dyke, or the more
general designation of the King's ditch. Ethelfla^
repaired these defences ; and they must have again been
renewed after the calamitous visit of Anlaf, probably by
one of the early Norman lords of the Castle.
We have not discovered how long the fortifications
remained in a state fit for defence. They seem to have
gone to decay from disuse at an early period, appa>
rently between the reign of Richard II. and that of
Henry VI.; as then the part of Lichfield-street once
called Outwall-street, being external to the bar, became
united in name with the rest. The soil within ditch
has always been cultivated, but such a practice did not
CASTLE AND TOWN. 428
diminish its utility for defence^ and was far from an
uncommon occurrence in this country.
The fortifications may still be easily traced in the
greater part of their extent, by the ditch and mound :
all vestiges of the walls are gone. Of the western side,
commencing by the Tame, a little below Lady-bridge,
and running in a straight line to a level with the top
of Aldergate, the part between the river and the
Boman Catholic Chapel, — ^built on the embankment, —
has been obliterated by the gardens near the stream,
and by the houses in and about Lichfield-street But
from this Chapel, the mound and ditch are very apparent,
the latter being a broad but now shallow excavation
in the general level of soil. At the comer, where they
turn off at a little more than a right angle eastwards
towards the Perrycrofts, the bank is of some height. It
may be observed for a short distance along the north
side, but it is soon lost: the ditch may be traced con-
siderably farther. Eastwards of Gungate, the vestiges
become more distinct than in any other part. The
second angle is here situated in a field called Hill or
Castle-croft.^ Along the east side, the bank and fosse,
may be seen more or less distinctly, behind Gungate,
Colehill, and Bolebridge-street, until the houses and
buildings near the bottom of the latter interrupt them,
and efface all traces of their course. Dugdale states
that, according to his own observation, the ditch was
at least forty-five feet broad.* Being now entirely taken
up by buildings, crofts, gardens, and some of the sur-
rounding lanes, it has become very greatly obliterated;
1 Our readers will call to mind the Castle-lane and Castle-orcliard, situated near
the Walftirlong, of which we have previonsly spoken.
3 Dugdale's Warwicksh.
424 TAMWOBTH
but it is Tery evident that the width was not over-rated.
The original height of the embankment, judging from
the parts best preserved, would appear to have been
from fifteen to twenty-five feet.
Within the last forty years, many bones of horses
and other animals have been found in digging within
the entrenchment Even those of human beings are
said to have been discovered; but this circumstance is
extremely doubtful. K true, they were probably remains
of persons slain when the Danes last besieged the town.
Nothing, however, has been brought to light of any
value or interest to the student of antiquities.
THE FREE GRAMMAH SCHOOL.
The Free Grammar School of Tamworth may be con-
jectured to have existed in the fourteenth century; but
its origin is involved in obscurity. It appears to have
been under the control of the ecclesiastical authorities
of the town. Leland mentions it in his interesting
Itinerary. He says, ''there is a Guild of St. Geo.* in
Tamworth, and to it belonged 5/. Land per an., and of
late one Johne Bailie' gave other 5/. Land unto it ; and
therewith is now erected a Ghrammer-Schoole.*'' This
appears to refer to the building of the School-house.
The Free Grrammar School came into the hands of
the king, in 1547, at the same time with the College.
The commission directed to sir Henry Mildmay and
Robert Kelway included not only the Church, but the
maintenance and continuation of this foundation, if they
deemed it necessary. They ordered that it should re-
main, and that one Nicholas Brooke should still enjoy
the place of schoohnaster, receiving the annual stipend
of 10/. IBs. &id., that had from old time been answered
to him; which, should be paid by the auditor and
1 Ws hftve found rery aaukty memorialB of th« Holy GaOd of St. George, a rery
gOMnl reUgloiu oonfrtternlty in the town. TheconrtxoUsitatetliKtonthe ISthof
October, 1610, John Lycett and Thomas Goldaon were elected wardena of the gnild.
The wantana were, peihaq^alao keepers of the Uffht of their patron aalnt Ihepneat
of St George in the Church waa the phaplahi.
s A Ifr. Bailey founded a feUowahip in St. John's c6Uege, Osmhridfe, which waa
anfmentedbyhisezecntarai appropriated tlrat to a native of the pariah of nmwarth,
then to one of the county of Staflbrd or Deihy, and then to one of the diocese of
lichlieid and Coventry. Hie peraon elected most be in lUl order at twenty-fbiir years
of age, or within twelve months after.
3 Vol. IV., fol. 189. b.
426 TAMWORTH
receiver of the court of augmentation and revenues of
the crown of the county of Stafford. Elizabeth, when
she granted the College to Edmund Downing and
Peter Ashton, in the year 1581, retained the amount
of salary to be paid, as part of the fee>farm rent.
Queen Elizabeth, by her charter of 1588, reciting the
order of the commissioners, directed that there should be
a Grammar School in the town, which should be called
''the Free Grammar School of Elizabeth, queen of
England, in Tamworth,** for the education and instruc-
tion of boys in grammar, to continue for all future time,
and to consist of one master or pedagogue. And she
appointed the baili£b and commonalty a body corpo-
rate, by the name of ''the Guardians and Grovemors
of the Possessions, Revenues, and Goods, of the Free
Grammar School of Elizabeth, Queen of England, in
Tamworth." She gave them the power, in this capacity,
of nominating and appointing the schoolmaster. She also
granted to the guardians and governors the annual rent of
10/. ISs. 2|ef., for the salary of the master, which was
to be paid in the manner prescribed in 1548.^
The School thus constituted and governed proved a
good institution, and of much utility to the town
and neighbourhood. The building occupied since the
revival of the foundation was at first merely rented for
the purpose. But by deed, dated the 26th of May,
1594, sir John Bowes, knight, of Elford, freely granted
to the bailiffs and commonalty the burgage known as
the School-house, with the adjoining garden, to be used
as a Grammar School for ever.' On the site of this
the present building has been erected.
We have not discovered the appointments of the
1 Charter, 30 Eliz. 'J Deed, 30 Eliz.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 427
earlier schoolmasters. One of them, Henry Baron, was
buried on the 3rd of March, 1624-5.' William Black,
it seems, was elected to the office in 1635. On his
cessation in 1644, Mr. Ellis was chosen, whose nomi-
nation by the guardians occurred on the 30th of May.*
How long the latter continued to occupy the place, we
cannot say. On the 7th of November, 1659, the
guardians and governors elected George Antrobus, M.A.,
to be schoolmaster, during his life.'
Charles II., by his charter to the town dated February,
1663-4, confirmed the grant of the School made by queen
Elizabeth, and formed the bailifib into a body corporate
under the same name of guardians and governors. It
was also directed, that they, with the consent of the
high-steward of the borough, should have full power to
frame statutes for the regulation of the School ; that the
guardians and governors, with the twenty-four capital
burgesses, assembled in common hall, should have the
appointment of the master ; they should have the ancient
annuity of 10/. ISs. Z^d. for his salary; and also the
house and garden then used for the School, and called
the School-house, for the residence of the master/
During the time that Mr. Antrobus presided over
the institution, the School attained its most flourishing
state. Several eminent persons were here educated by
him, and amongst them the rev. William Whiston,
whose religious publications and strong vindication of
Arian tenets attracted so great attention in the former
part of last century. He married his master's daughter.'
Nor were the exertions of Mr. Antrobus confined to
the literary dignity of the foundation. In 1674, he
1 Pftiisb Reirister. 2 Corporation records. 3 Indenture, l6S0.
4 Charter, iG Car. II. 5 Whiston's Memoirs.
428 TAMWOBTH
added a bay and a half of boildiDgs at the back of the
master's residence, at his own expenoe, except 8/L
granted for the purpose by the corporation.^ And in
in 1677, he raised extensive contributions, by whidi he
wajB enabled to rebuild the School-room^ and fit it up
in the present style.
The assistance then rendered, abstracted £rom a tablet
placed in the room, was as follows: —
if. 8. d.
Tlie gaardians and governors of the Scfaool» out of the town
ftmds 10 0 0
Charlei lord Clifford of Lansborongh, eldest son of Bich.
esrl of Burlington, and M.P. for Tamworth •• 10 0 0
John Swinfen. esq., M.P. for Tamworth 3 0 0
Sir Andrew Hacket, recorder 5 0 0
John lord visooont Massareen 10 0 0
Sophia countess Wimbledon 2 0 0
Sir Edward Littleton, bart. .. 5 0 0
Letitia, widow of sir Thomas Wendj,K3 5 0 0
Sir Humphry Ferrers, knt 5 00
Thomas, eldest son of Henrj Thynne, hart. 10 0 0
Emma, widow of Francis Willonghby, esq 10 0 0
Sebright Repington, esq 3 0 0
Henry Leigh, esq 10 0
William Pslmer, esq 3 0 0
Catherine, widow of Clement Wlnstsnley, esq 3 0 0
John Stratford, esq 3 0 0
Francis Wolverstan, esq., gave the schoolmaster's seat and
desk, which he erected in the School at his sole charge.
Joseph Oirdler, esq. .. .. 5 0 0
Johanna, relict of WaldiTeWlllington, esq. 10 0
Susanna, widow of WaldiTeWillington, esq. .. 1 0 0
GeorgeAlsop 10 0
WilliamAshley 10 0
Walter Ashmore 0 10 0
Leicester Barbour 10 0
George Barbour, M.D 10 0
1 Corporation records.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 429
John Barbour 2 00
Thomas Barnes 2 00
Lawrence Baskerville 3 10 6
JobBeardsley 0 10 0
Samnd Beardflley 0 10 0
niomas Bearcroft 2 00
Thomas Bearcroft, derk 2 00
PhiHp Bearcroft 0 10 0
Thomas Brook, derk 0 10 0
Richard Cross, derk 10 0
ThomasDeviU 0 10 0
Samnd Dilke 2 00
JohnDowley 2 3 0
SamudFIoyer 2 10 0
Peter Floyer 2 10 0
Samnd Frankland 2 6 0
Francis Cramer 10 0
Thomas Cny 5 00
JohnCny 2 0 0
Nicholas Juxon 2 0 0
Samnd Langley, derk 2 00
Samnd NichoUs, clerk 2 0 0
Nicholas Parker 10 0
JohnPyott 10 0
Morgan Powell 10 0
William Pickard 3 0 0
Thomas Pickard 10 0 0
WilliamPretty 0 10 0
John Rawlet, derk 6 0 0
JohnSavage 0 10 0
HenryStone 10 0
William Symonds 100
Edward Symonds 10 0
John Vanghton, sen. . . 10 0
John Vanghton, jun. .. 100
Thomas Willington, besides a snffidency of stone, which he
fredy allowed to be got out of his quarry 2 0 0
Middlemore Wolverston 0 10 0
William Wragg, derk 0 ^0 <>
158 16 6
k3
430 TAMWORTH
About 40/. of this sum was procured by Mr. Antrobos
from gentlemen, strangers to the town, who had been
his scholars, or from the friends of those who were still
under his tuition. Many other persons gave sums of
money below lOs., which were not set down. Some
also living in the neighbourhood assisted in the work
with the gift of labour, and employed their teams to
carry the materials.
The rebuilding of the School was completed in 1678.
It is a spacious convenient room, ootistructed of brick,
with stone dressings. It has now acquired a sombre
aspect externally, and, although not yet two-hundred
years old, is beginning to lose its firmness. The
master's seat and desk is a large oak structure, and
bears carved upon it the admonitory sentence,
VT IMFBRES PARSBB F. W.
D18CA8.
VT DICTITSS TACERS 1678.
Shortly after these improvements in the edifice had
been carried into effect, a scholarship was founded in
one of the colleges of Cambridge, for a person educated
at this School. Samuel Frankland, M.A., a native of
the parish of Tamworth, where he was educated, who
became head-master of the school at Coventry, by his
last will and testament, bearing date the 21st of July,
1691, demised to his wife, for her natural life, his
messuage, lands, and hereditaments, lying at Cubbing-
ton, in the county of Warwick; with all his personal
property. And after her decease, he bequeathed the
lands, and so much of his personal estate remaining as
should be required to make up the amount of 600/., to
the masters and fellows of Catherine-haU, in Cambridge,
and to their successors for ever, upon these uses and
CASTLE AND TOWN. 481
trusts. The sum of 20/. a-year should go towards the
maintenance of a fellow sent to the haU out of the gram-
mar-school of Coventry, towards which object Matthew
Scrivener, by his last will, had given an annuity of 201.
These sums, with a convenient chamber, for which Mr.
Frankland had already paid 80/. to the college, would
form a handsome provision for the ^^ Frankland fellow-
ship." And 10/. a-year should be assigned for the
maintenance of one scholar, sent to the haU, at the
recommendation of the minister and schoolmaster, out
of the Free Grammar School at Tamworth, for whom
had been promised a chamber free from charge. But if
the sum raised should fall short of 600/., the scholar-
ship should bear the loss, so that the fellowship might
remain unimpaired.^
George Antrobus died in July, 1708, after he had
been schoolmaster for nearly forty-nine years. On the
16th of September following, the bailifb and common-
alty nominated Dr. Samuel Shaw to the place, and
directed that he should enter into his duties on St.
Thomas' day ensuing; but his patent was not signed
until the 7th of January. In the mean time, Mrs.
Antrobus and her son Burgesse carried on the School.'
Dr. Shaw maintained the School in the high repute,
in which it was consigned to his care. He was the
author of some good Latin works for the use of his
1 Capyoffhewill. The Bcholarthip WM not diminiBbed.
Dr. Robert Green, a natiye of Tamworth, who received his early education under
Mr. Antrobus, and became a fellow of Clare-hall, Cambrid^, by his will dated the
1 0th of October, 1731, bequeathed money for the pnrchase of two pieces of plate,—
iUTcr cups,— of the Talue of (U, each, bearingr appropriate inscriptions, to be given to
two scholars in tiieir sophisters* years, the first as a reward of piety, virtue, and good-
ness; and the second for ingenuity, scholarship, and learning,— it being a more
dlAcult task to be a real Christian than an excellent scholar. And if it should happen
that, in the Judgment of the masters and fellows of the college, the same youth
shonkl be the most eminent of his year for both the endowments of piety and
lesmiDg, he should be presented with the two pieces of plate.
2 Corporation records.
4SS TAMWORTH
scholan. He repaired the buildings of the School,
in 1710, at a charge of 15/. Ids. 5d., of which 10/.
was repaid him by the corporation; who, in 1728,
allowed him 28/. 14«. for further improTements.^ He
continued here until his decease, which occurred in
April, 1730. Mrs. Shaw provided for the School, until
a successor was nominated.
Thomas Ebdall, M.A., was appointed schoolmaster,
on the 15th of September following, by the guardians
and capital burgesses. He remained in the office for
a very short time, tendering his resignation on the
8th of February, 1782-3; at which time the rev.
William Sawrey was chosen to supply his place.
William Sawrey continued to exercise his duties as
schoolmaster about eight years; when he resigned.
The rev. John Princep was immediately chosen in
the place of Mr. Sawrey, on the 2l8t of January,
1740-1, by the guardians and governors. On the 11th
of October, 1752, he resigned into the hands of the
corporation their gift of the Free School to him.*
On the 26th of October following, the rev. Simon
Collins was nominated to be the master. Under his
superintendence, the School appears to have been in a
prosperous state, there being numerous classical scholars
on the foundation, and boarders admitted from a dis-
tance.
On the demise of Simon Collins, in 1793, the rev.
John Oldershaw was chosen by the guardians, whose
nomination occurred on the 25th of June. He remained
here about thirteen years.
The rev. Charles Edward, son of Simon Collins, was
elected master on the Ist of August, 1805, when
1 Corpontion recordt. 2 lUd.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 438
his predecessor resigned the office. During his contin-
uance here, the institution rapidly declined^'and at last
the mastership became a complete sinecure. When he
gave it up, there was a vacancy for half a year, and
the operation of the School was wholly suspended.
On the appointment of the rev. Samuel Downes, on
the 17th of August, 1813, the guardians attempted to
remedy the defects lately manifested, which tended so
greatly to impair the utility of the foundation. These
principally arose from the scantiness of the endowment,
and the practice of granting the office of schoolmaster
for the life of the person, without retaining the imme-
diate power of removal at any time. Some rules were
drawn up, with the consent of the high-steward, by
which it was ordered that the master should instruct
all the free scholars in arithmetic, and writing, and
also reading English and the principles of English
grammar, and that he should be entitled to a compen-
sation of four guineas a-year from each of those who
should receive such instructions. Mr. Downes also was
made to give a bond to the guardians and governors,
conditioning that he would resign within the space of
six months after he should have been requested to
do so in writing by them. The School began to
revive for a little time. The building was put in
repair, in 1814, at a considerable expence, 68/. lbs.
being raised by public contribution, in addition to
50/. which was granted out of the corporation funds.
The late sir Robert Peel gave 20/. Mr. Downes had
about a dozen scholars, of whom three or four were
boarders. But he soon voluntarily ceased to receive
more; and the School again sunk, insomuch that, in
J, there were only four boys who attended for
484 TAKWOBTH
two hoxas in the morning, and then resorted to
other schools to acquire knowledge in other essential
branches of education. Afterwards the institution be-
came entirely deserted, although Mr. Downes still
resided in the house, and received the emoluments of
his office. The building fell into a state of great
delapidation. The disapprobation of the guardians and
governors at the existing state of the institution was
strongly expressed at a meeting held on the 29th of
September, 1826; and, soon afterwards, Mr. Downes
placed his resignation in their hands. On the 9ih of
May, in the following year, the rev. Thomas Pearson
Tiammin was elected master in his stead.^
The School-room and house adjoining were thoroughly
repaired, at an ezpence of 169/. 78. 8d., which was
defrayed by public subscription. Under the very able
and judicious management of Mr. Lammin, whose exer-
tions were ever unremitting, the School once more
became a flourishing institution, numbering between
thirty and forty day-scholars, and about eight boarders,
the latter of whom paid thirty guineas a-year.
In the order of the high court of Chancery made in
1837, by which all the charitable gifts belonging to
the town that had been consigned to the care and man-
agement of the late bailifb and commonalty, were
placed for administration in the hands of nine trustees,
the Free Grammar School, being then under no legal
governance, was specially included. In consequence,
these trustees, — ^William Knight, Matthew Ingle, Richard
Barratt, Shirley Palmer M.D., Thomas Cox, John
Butler, Francis Hunter, Samuel Hanson, and B. K.
Fallows, — received the control of this institution, with
1 CorpoFition reoonU.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 486
as full and ample powers as the late guardians and
govemors had ever possessed under the charters of
Elizabeth and Charles II. To them, the election of
the master now appertains.
The decease of the rev. T. P. Lammin occurred on
the 16th of March, 1837. The School was vacant for
a time ; but, towards the close of the same year, the
trustees appointed Mr. Henry Handley to be master,
by whom the office is still held.
The School is only free for boys residing within the
borough. Of the stipend paid by the crown, the master
only receives 7/. 18*., the remainder being deducted for
land-tax and fees of office. Several gifts in perpetuity,
derived from the liberality of private individuals, have
increased the amount to about 84/. These we shall
especially mention, when we speak of the charities con-
nected with the town. The School-house is held by
the master rent-free. The efficacy of the institution is
very much limited by the exceedingly small endowment
attached to it. It is evident that, unless the emoluments
be considerably increased, either by public grant or
private benefitctions, this institution will never fully
realize the intention of its establishment. Tet, from
the absence of any large school of eminence for some
distance around, the utility of the Free Grammar School
of Tamworth would be incalculably great, not only to
the town, but to the surrounding neighbourhood.
SIR ROBERT PEEL'S SCHOOL.
There had long been acknowledged in Tamworth a
great deficiency, tending to retard the moral improve*
ment of the people, in the absence of any pubUc
institution, conducted on an extensive and liberal scale,
for the education of the children of the poor inhabi-
tants. The first great and successful attempt to remedy
the defect, was made by the late sir Robert Peel, bart
The family of Peel is of andent
standing in the county-palatine of
Lancaster.
Robert Psbl, of Oswaldtwistle,
Lancashire, d. about 1736, and was
bur, at Blackburn. His son, by
Anne his wife,
William FKbl, of Oswaldtwistle,
m. Jane, dan. of Lawrence Walms-
ley, of Darwin, in Lancashire ; d. a-
bout 1760, and was bur. at Black-
bum, in the same county. His son,
ROBBBT PeKL,
was ». in 1722.
He resided, dnriog
the greater part of
his life, at Ped-
fold or Peel-cross,
near Blackburn ;
and was a farmer
and cotton-manu-
facturer. After his
works had been
attacked by a mob,
he remoTed his
gpiimiiig-trade to
Burton-on-Trent,
in Staffordshire;
where heestablish-
ed cotton-mills-
He d. Sept. 12th,1795, and was bur.
at St. John's, Manchester. By his
wife Elizabeth, dau. of Edmund Ho-
worth, of Blackburn, — she d, in
March, 1796,^he had,
I. William, of Church.lMmk, co. of
Lancaster, who m. Mary daa.of Tlio.
Howorth, of Blackborn, and had a
large family.
II. EoMuxo, who m., and had iuae.
III. RoBBRT, of whom we shall imme-
diately speak.
IV. Jonathan.
V. La wasNcs, who m., and had issue.
CASTLE AND TOWN.
487
In the year 1820^ he founded^ entirely at his own
expense, a School conducted on the national plan for
the instruction of 100 poor boys, providing them at
n. JoMVH, who d, in 1890, learing
ni. JoMir, of Biirton-apoD>'nreiit.
Till. Ajtm, who WM m., ist to the rev.
Borlace ¥nilock, of HorwoocU in
Lancashire; Snd to the rev. Geo.
Park, of Hawkstead. Shetf.ininO.
RoBS&T Pbsl, the founder of the
fortunes of his family, was b, at Peel-
fold, Apr. 25th, 1750. He was
educated at Blacklmm grammar
schooL Li 1778, he entered into
partnership with Messrs. Yates and
Howard, of Bnry, bringingin a share
of 3 or 4,000/. of property to the
firm ; who established a cotton
mannfactory at Chamber-hall. The
business was first limited to calico-
printing; bat afterwards all the other
branches were added. Uninterrupted
success attended the concern; and
soon the works were extended to
numerons places, in different counties.
Mr. Peel became a banker in Man-
chester for a short time. In 1778,
having acquired a large fortune, he
pnrdMsed Drayton-manor from the
marquis of Bath. He brought the
ootton-trade'into Tamworth and the
neighbourhood. He soon came from
Chamber-hall to reside at Drayton.
Mr. Ptel was returned to Parliament
for Tamworth in 1790, and he con-
tinued to represent the borough until
1820. In 1797, he and Mr. Yates
contributed 10,000/. towards defray-
ing the expenses of the war; and he
asSdstod in the formation and support
of the Lancashire Fendbles and the
Tamworth Armed Association. In
1798, he took the command of six
companies of men, called the Bury
Loyal Volunteers, chiefly formed of
his own work-people. For his ser-
vices, he was created a baronet, Nov.
29th, 1800. In 1818, sir Robert
Peel retired from the cotton business,
having realized, it is conjectured, no
less than 2,500,000/. He d. at
Drayton, May 3rd, 1830. His will
was proved June 8Ui following. The
personals were sworn at *' upper
value" or more than 900.000/. ; the
probate-stamp was 15,000/., and the
legacy-duty paid exceeded 10,000/.
Drayton-park, and other estates in
the COS. of Warw. and Staff., were
entailed on the title. To the 240,000/.
previously advanced as gifts to, or
settled on, his children, — exclusive
of 9,000/. per annum secured to his
eldest son, — sums were added in-
creasing the portions of his five
younger sons to 135,000/. each, and
those of his daughters to 53,000/.
each. His legacies to friends and old
servants and his bequests to public
institutions amounted to a very con-
siderable sum. Of the residue,
calculated at 500,000/., four-ninths
were given tohis ddest son, and one-
ninth to each of the younger ones.
Sir Robert Peel was twice m. His
1st wife, m. July 8th, 1783, was
EUen, dau. of his partner Mr.
Yates i—b. March 22nd, 1766,— by
whom he had a numerous family*
His 2nd wife, m. Oct. 18th, 1805,
was Susanna, youngest sister of the
rev. sir W. H. Clarke, hart., rector
ofBury:shetf.Sept. 19th, 1824. s.p.
X. Mart. b. Jane 17th. 1784; m. Jan.
9th, 1810, to the rt. hon. Geo. Rob.
Dawson, of Castle-Dawson, formerly
aecretanr to the treasury.
II. Elixabbth, b. Apr. isth, 1780; m.
Dec. 30th, 1805, to the rev. Will. Cock,
bum, dean of York; d. Jane 10th 1828.
III. RoBBRT, the present rt. hon.
baronet.
IV. William Tatss, b. Ang. Srd, 1789.
He m., Jane 17th, 1 81 9, lady Jane-
Elisabeth Moore, Snd dan. of Stephen,
e. of Moontcashel ; and has a nomer-
oas family. The rt. hon. W. T. Peel
has been M.P. for TSmwortb, and a
member of the privy coancil.
T. Bdmvnd, 6. Aag. 8th, 1791 ; m., in
18IS, Jane, 2nd dan. of JohnSwinfen,
esq., of Swinfen, co. of Staff. He
was formerly M.P. for Newcastle-
VI. Elbanora, d. an infant.
Tii. Anvb, d. an infant.
Tin. HARRiBTT-ELBAiroRA. b. BCaTch
2Sth, 17^ j m. March lUl), I9i4, to
the rt. hdn. kabtrt, iiiil lord H^nlry ,
a master in ChwacerYt wrio d,m Ui«
early part of lUi,
4S8
TAMWOBTH
II. JoBif, d. Atir. ttnd, 1798, in orden,
bcinf a prebeDdary of (^ntertnur,
and rlcw of Stone. Hem. May 0th,
1894, Angusta, another dan. of John
Bwinfen, eaq.
z. Jonathan, b, Oct. Itth, 17P9{ a
lleut..ootonel In the army* and M.P.
for Hnntlncdon. Hem., March I9th«
1884, lady Alida^ane Kennedy,
yoongest dan. of Archibald, e. of
the same time with clothes, and giving to each
shilling loaf weekly. This excellent establishment
supported by the founder during his life: and, in his
he declared that thej oonld no longer
be resiatad with Mfety to the national
welfare, he lesomed ofSoe on theoon-
didon of conceding them. ConKioae
of the oppodtion of anch a meanitt
to the aentimentB of his conetiftnenti,
in the early part of 1S29, he raiigned
hia seat for the nniveraity of Ozfiwd.
His re-election wae loccenfally op-
posed hy sir Rob. H. In|^ ; biit,
March 5th, he was dected for the
borough of Westhory. The Cadiolie
Emandpetian-bill, whidi had king
formed a subject of dispute and agita-
tion, was carried, and, Apr. 13th,
receiTed the royal aaaent. Mr. Feel
sncceedcd to the baronetcy of his
family, in May, 1830. In this year,
he lost hia office of home aeoretaiy.
on the aooeaaian of the Whig-party
to power. From thia time, he has
been returned to Parliament for Tarn-
worth. At the cloae of 1834, air
Robert Peel waa called upon to form
a new government, and he became
prime minister and chancellor of the
exchequer ; but hia adminiatration waa
of a short duration, as he resigned
in the April foUowing. InMay,1839t
he waa again elevated to the digmty
of prime-minister; but, in a fow days,
he resigned the important trust; wlMn
the Whig sdminlstration resumed
power, in the middle of die year
1841, he was, a third time, called
upon to aaaume the dignity of first
lord of the treaaory : and, ttom that
time to the present day, he has re-
tained the govenunent of the Britiah
Empire. The right hon. air Robert
Peel m., June 8th, 1820, Julia,
youngest dau. of general air John
Floyd, hart., and hM,
1. BoaaaT, b. May 4tfa, isn.
u. Fbxdbbick, b, Oct. 99th, 1813.
m. William, b. Nov. and, 18S4.
IV. Jobn-Plotd, b. May llth, I8I7.
V. Arthur. WBLLatLST»6Jluf Srd,l8a9*
VI. Julia, m., 1841, Ocoiftt vtecouit
VllUen, eldest ton of Geotse, earl of
Jersey.
Vll»
r narattls of Ailaa, K.T.
zi. ItAVRRMCB, b. £a 1800 1 m., July
SOth, issa, lady Jane Lennox, 4th dau.
of Charles, 4th duke of Richmond.
RoBsnT Pbsl, esq.,— -the present
right hon. sir Robert Peel, hart, —
was b, at Chamber-hall, near Bury,
Feb. 5th, 1788. He was sent to
school at Harrow, and finished his
education at Christ Church-college,
Ozfbrd. In 1809, he was returned
to Parliament for Cashel, in Ireland,
and commenced the splendid political
career, by which hia life has been
since distinguished. His promotion
in the state soon followed. In 1810.
he was appointed under-secretary of
Btate for the colonial department.
In the administration of Uie eari of
Liverpool, which succeeded that of
Mr. Perdval, the rt. hon. Robert
Peel, in Sept., 1812, waa constituted
chief secretary for Ireland, under the
viceroyship of the late duke of Rich-
mond. At the general election, in
the same year, he was returned to
Parliament for Chippenham. And,
in 1817, 1818, 1820, and 1826, he
was returned for the university of
Oxford. In 1818, he retired from
bis office as Irish secretary ; but,
Jan. 17th, 1822, was appointed sec«
retary for the home department.
This post he retuned until 1827,
when Mr. Canning came into power
for a short time. After the death of
this statesman, in the same year, Mr.
Peel again became home-secretary,
under the administration of the duke
of Wellington. Mr. Peel had hitherto
been one of the most powerful oppo-
nents of the claims of Catholics to
emancipation ; but now, convinced
CASTLE AND TOWN.
439
wiU^ he bestowed upon it an ample endowment by
leaving for its maintenance the sum of 6^000/. The
complete control of it he placed in the hands of his
eldest son^ the present right hon. sir Robert Peel.
During the year 1837^ a neat commodious building
was erected in Lichfield-street, to serve as a School in
place of a large room^ which had heretofore been
occupied for that purpose^ and was situated in Church-
street^ adjoining the Church-yard. Here about 80 boys
now receive the regular instruction^ which their station
in life may demand.
THE NATIONAL SCHOOL.
The inconvenience resulting from the want of rooms
amply sufficient in size and possessed of the necessaiy
accommodations for Sundaj-schools in connection with,
and under the control of the authorities of, the church
of England, reasonably created a desire on the part of
the persons belonging to the establishment for the
erection of a building that would subserve a purpose of
so great utility and importance. In order to remedy
the manifest defect, active measures were adopted, in
1826, by the rev. Francis Blick, then vicar, and his
friends, to raise the necessary funds. A bazaar was
then held in the Town-hall for the sale of small fiemcy
or usefrd articles, the result of which was the realization
of the sum of 323/. The success attendant upon this
occasion, and the promises of liberal assistance which
were tendered by influential and wealthy persons, led
to the determination that the plan originally laid down
should be enlarged, and a weekly School, conducted on
Dr. fiell's system of education, established, and the
rooms erected for such a purpose used on the first day
of the week as a Sunday-school. The accomplishment
of this extended scheme necessarily demanded an increase
of outlay. To provide for this, a second bazaar was
held in the early part of the year 1828, by means of
which an additional sum of 853/. was obtained. Ezten-
CASTLE AND TOWN. 441
sive subscriptions were also raised throughout the town
and neighbourhood. The National society bestowed 200/.^
and 50/. was given by that of Lichfield. A sufficient
sum was thus obtained for the foundation of the School.
The building stands in College-lane, on the site of
the College-house of the ancient yicars. The erection
and fitting up of the whole cost nearly 1^0/. It is
a neat building, and consists of two rooms, the lower
in front for boys, and the upper at the back for
girls. Behind is another room used for the preparatory
training of in&nts.
The School is supported, partly by small weekly
payments from each child, and partly by free contribu-
tions. An annuity of 8/. is paid out of the rev. J.
Rawlet's charity, for the education of twelve girls free*
On the disbandment of the Tamworth volunteers, 400/.
raised for their support was left in the hands of the
late sir Robert Lawley. This sum was subsequently
invested in the three per cents, in the name of certain
trustees, to educate freely in this School for every 1/.
of interest an immediate child or grandchild of the
volunteers, at the nomination of the trustees : and after
the failure of such children the interest should be ap-
plied to the general purposes of this institution. The
trustees appointed were, sir Bobert Lawley, bart.;
Francis Lawley, esq., M.P. ; the vicar of Tamworth;
and the perpetual curate or curates of Wilnecote and
Wigginton, for the time being; and Bichard F. A*
Freeman, esq. In case of the deceases of sir Bobert
and Mr. Francis Lawley, two representatives of the
same family should be chosen in their stead.
The School is conducted in a very efficient manner,
and is numerously attended.
THE WORKHOUSE.
The first attempt to provide a xemedy for the great
inoonvenienoe which was occasioned to the town by the
wants and the number of the poor, and to furnish a per-
manent relief to the burden which such had created,
was made in the reign of James 11. The right hon.
Thomas lord yisooimt Weymouth,* by indenture dated
the 26th of February, 1686-7, granted to the bailiA
of the town and their successors, to sir Edward
Littleton bart., Sebright Repington esq., Franda Wol-
verston esq., Nicholas Parker gent., George Alsop
gent, and Samuel Langley derk, their heirs and assigns,
for the promotion and encouragement of industry and
the provision of a place for the poor, a bam and fold
on the south side of a lane leading from the School*
house of Tamworth towards Amington*haIl ; upon trust,
that they should convert the same into a Workhouse
wherein the poor might be employed and their children
instructed.
The bam thus liberally bestowed by lord Wey^
mouth, was estimated at about SO/. A new building
was erected on the ground by public contributions,
which, with the value of materials and of labour freely
given, amounted to 1192. its. 6d. Amongst the benefactors
were, Samuel Port alias Porch, who gave 102.; sir
Edward Littleton, 5/.; dame Elizabeth Ferrers, bl.;
CABTLB AND TOWN. 44S
Matthew Floyer^ four trees valued at 51. ; Thomas Guy,
$/.; Sebright Sepington, 6,000 bricks valued at SI.; sir
Henry Gough, 1/. 10s. ; and John Guy, 1/.* This
building obtained the name of the Spinning-school. It
was used only for children; and was mostly supported
by voluntary subscriptions. The corporation usually
gave 4/. a-year towards its maintenance; and, in July,
1693, a similar annual sum was added by Thomas Guy.*
The Spinning-school, in the course of time, — ^for what
reason does not plainly appear, — ^fell entirely into disuse;
90 that, in 1719, it was directed by the bailifb and
commonalty that the building should be converted into
a number of houses for the poor. This order was im-
mediately put into execution.'
The number of paupers continually increasing, and
the burden of their maintenance becoming by degrees
very great, it was thought necessary, in 1789, to erect
a Workhouse within the borough for the benefit of the
town ; and, on the 10th of May, the baili£Es and com-?
monalty ordered that subscriptions should be raised and
solicited for the promotion of such a purpose. The
bounty of a nobleman saved the town from incurring
the great expense of raising an edifice. James earl of
Northampton, the lord of the Castle, purchased a mes-
suage and piece of land containing Ir. Up. situated in
Gungate, adjoining Colehill; and there he erected a
large building fi)r a Workhouse. And by indenture of
the 14th of December* 1741, he granted this to the use
of the borough, for the lodging, maintenance, and
employment of the poor of the borough and also of
the Castle-liberty ; and for other charitable uses specified,
the earl gave the land and messuage to William lord
1 Langle7'tM*S*ilfl90* 9 QqipanOoiL B«oardt. s lb.
444 TAMWORTH
Andover and others, upon trust, to pennit the inha-
bitants to use it, provided they employed it as a
Workhouse. And in case it should be disused as such
for the space of twelve months, the trustees should
take possession of it: and they, vnth the minister,
baili£Es, and town-clerk of the borough, should let the
premises, and apply the rents, after deducting so much
as should be requisite for repairs, to such pious and
charitable uses as they should think proper, amongst
the inhabitants of the borough and liberty having l^al
settlements there, regard being paid to the greatest and
most necessitous objects of charity. And when the
trustees, by death or othervnse, should be reduced to
three, the survivors should immediately elect four more
new trustees, substantial inhabitants of the town of
Tamworth or gentlemen of estate and condition in the
counties of Stafford or Warwick. The expenses of the
new deeds of trust, and all other charges incident to
the charity should be paid out of the poors* levies
whilst the building should serve as a Workhouse, and
afterwards out of the rents and profits of the messuage.'
But the new Poor-house was soon insufficient to
afford all the relief which was required. The edifice
in Gungate was abandoned in 1750 for the present
Workhouse, which had been erected and completely
furnished for such a purpose at the expense of Thomas
lord viscount Weymouth and Francis lord Middleton,
who, by deed dated the 4th of May, in that year,
gave it to be used for the poor of the town. The gen*
erosity of these noblemen thus spared the inhabitants
the cost and trouble which they would otherwise have
had to encounter.
1 Chuitf GoDunlarionen* Report.
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 446
Under the new poor law^ this institution has been
constituted the Union Workhouse to serve not only for
the poor of the parish of Tamworth^ but also for those of
Austrey, Canwell, Chilcote^ Clifton-Campyile, Croxall,
Drayton-Basset^ Edingale^ Harlaston^ Hints^ Kingsbury,
Middleton, Newton-Regis, Seckington, Shuttington,
Statfold, and Thorpe-Constantine, in the neighbourhood.
As an increase of accommodation was requisite for this
purpose, a smaller building has been added.
The Workhouse stands on the west side of Ladybridge-
bank, near to, but at some height above, the northern
bank of the Tame. Its situation is exceedingly fine,
and very airy. The old building is large and substan-
tial, and is totally tree from that gloomy and prison-like
appearance so sadly characterizing places of a similar
destination which have been erected in recent times.
Indeed, it presents more the aspect of a well-built
and good hospital, and forms a prominent object at the
southern entrance of the town far from disagreeable
to the sight. It was once surmounted by a wooden
bell-turret, in the centre of the roof, with a clock and
weather-fane; but this was removed a few years ago.
Internally the rooms are spacious and very comfortable,
and the arrangements appear to be made in a superior
manner. The new building stands detached a little to
the west. It is entirely devoid of every ornament
externally; whilst the small and few windows lead to
to the conjecture that it is a very melancholy place.
The association of such an idea with it is at once dis-
persed by a visit to the interior. It is then perceived
that the great defects in its appearance arise only
from the absence of all architectural decoration and from
want of the study of effect.
m3
THE ALMSHOUSES.
This institution was founded by Thomas Guj, citizen
of London, to whom the inhabitants of Southwark are
indebted for the splendid hospital which bears his
name. His mother was a native of Tamworth;^ and
in the welfare of the town he took the deepest interest
for the greater part of his life, and aided in the prind-
pal improvements made whilst he was connected with
the place. In 1678, he bought some ground in Gun-
gate, and built the Almshouses, which he fitted up for
seven poor women, giving to each a weekly allowance.
One of the rooms, in 1688, he assigned for the library
bequeathed to the town by Mr. Rawlet. As he wished
to extend his foundation, the corporation, in 1692,
granted him some land north of the building, and there
he erected seven additional rooms that he might be
able to accommodate seven poor men. The whole cost
about 200/.'
The charitable founder supported the institution so
long as he lived, and provided an ample endowment
for it afterwards. By his last will and testament,' dated
the 4th of September, 1724, he devised to John Cheatly,
John Blood, Joseph Blood, Arthur Alcock, Thomas
1 Extract from the Pariah Refiiter:—
"June, iMi.
18. Muryed Mr. JoMph Seeley of OoTcntir & Mrs. Anne Quy of Tunwoith.'*
Mn. Gay wm the daoirhter of WUUam Vaof hton.
2 Corpontlon Records. S See Appendix :--Note M.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 447
Orton, John Radford, Robert Blood, and John Osbom,
his Almshouses situated partly in Gungate and partly
in Schoolhouse-lane, to hold in trust that they should,
from time to time, place there fourteen poor persons,
men and women, inhabitants of the townships of Wil-
necote, Glasoote, Bolehall-street, Amington, Wi^inton,
or Hopwas,' — his relations being preferred if any should
oflTer themselves, — ^whom they should think proper objects
of such a charity ; and so often as any of them died,
or were removed for misbehaviour, to place others in
their stead. When any trustee should die, the survi-
vors should choose another person to succeed him; and
to prevent any legal interest in the premises from going
to the heir of a surviving trustee, so often as the
trustees should be reduced to two, these should convey
the premises to other persons, upon the same trust.
And as the masters, wardens, and commonalty of the
art and mystery of Stationers, in the city of London,
were bound, by a bond, dated the 3rd of February,
1717, unto the governors of the hospital of St. Thomas
the Apostle in Southwark, for the payment of 125/. for
ever, half yearly, to the testator during his life, and
after his decease, to such purposes as he should direct,
1 It wiU be obMnredtiiattlw town of Tunwoithli excluded from lU benefit in tfali
Inatitation. Tbomae Guy represented the borough in perliament from 1095 to 1707>
Bat in the hitter yeer, the burgesees,— notwithftendiny the meny serricee of their
"inoompereble benefactor,*' and his repeated promises that, if they would support him,
he would leave his whole fortune to the town so that there should never be a pauper
here,— retomed an opposing candidate. The cause of Guy's r^ection is said to have
been his neglect of the gastronomic propensities of his worthy, patriotic, and enlighten-
ed oonstitQents, by whom the virtues of fissttng appear to have been entirely forgotten.
In the anger of the moment, hp threatened to pull down ths Town-hall which he had
boat, and to abolish Oie Almshouses.
The burgesses, repenting of their rash act, sent a deputation to wait upon him, with
the oflner of reflection in the ensuing parliament) but he rejected all condUation.
Being advanced hi age, he never represented any other place. He always considered
that he had been treated with great ingratitude, employed his Immense fortune
in enlarging St. Thomas's hospital, Southwark, and in building and endowing anothe
there; and he deprived the inhabitants of Tamworth of the advantage of his Alms-
booses here.
448 TAMWORTH
Mr. Guy appointed that tbe Bum should be paid^ by
half-yearly payments at the feast of St. John the
Baptist and the birth of our Lord God^ to his executors,
until the formation of the president and governors of
his hospital into a corporate body, who should then
receive it. Out of this, 115/. a-year, at the same terms,
should be given to the trustees of the Almshouses, who
should employ SOI. of it in providing for the mainte-
nance of the alms-people, two shillings a-week being
given to each, and the residue applied in the reparation
of the premises, or otherwise as might be thought fit
The remaining 851, should be applied by the trustees in
putting out children apprentices, nursing, or such like
charitable deed, of four, six, or eight poor persons
of the family of the Voughtons or Woods, or pro-
ceeding therefrom, as the trustees deemed fit : and if
none or not sufficient of such could be found, then of
other persons as should be considered proper objects of
charity.
The building is said to occupy the site of the ancient
Guild-hall of St. George. It is a plain substantial build-
ing, presenting two sides of a square, with a garden
behind common to the fourteen poor. Each of the
alms-people occupies two rooms, having separate entrance.
The front towards Gungate was rebuilt in 1827, and
bears a tablet recording the foundation. The annuity
of 115/. continues to be paid by the governors of Gujr's
hospital, Southwark. Out of it accumulations have been
made from the savings of weekly pay during vacancies
amongst the alms-people and from the money destined for
repairs, which, having been from time to time invested in
the funds, ultimately amounted to 1,388/. ISs. Id. new four
per cents. This stock was subsequently sold for
CASTLE AND TOWN. 449
1^416/. 188. 4d., which was laid out in the purchase of free-
hold property in the parish of St. Martin's^ Birmingham,
consisting of nine parcels of land and sixty new houses
erected thereon, let upon building leases, — of which about
66 years now remain unexpired, — ^producing a ground-
rent of 68/. 68. The purchase money was 1,670/., of
which 153/. was left as a debt bearing interest at 5/.
per cent. Thus, in 1823, the commissioners found
the income of the charity increased to 183/. 6«. This
had enabled the trustees to raise the weekly pay of
the poor people to $8. 6c/. a-week. The 85/. assigned
by the founder to the benefit of his poor relations was
distributed to such annually, without reference to their
residence, in sums varying from 5«« to 2/.; and after
insurance and all other incidental expences had been
paid, the surplus was laid by for augmenting the endow-
ment.
Very lately the trustees have extended the property
by the purchase of the premises called ^'Spinning School"
mentioned in page 443. It is in contemplation to raise
the amount of the weekly allowance assigned to the
alms-people.
THE CHARITIES.
Of the charities which existed before the time of
Edward VI., none now remain, all having been swept
away with the eodesiastical property. But since the
accession of Elizabeth, priyate individuals have left
numerous gifts in perpetuity, which constitute an im-
portant source of benefit, especially to the poor, who
form the general object of them. Most of them continue
to be administered at the present time; but some have
been entirely or in part lost, from circumstances which
have become mostly forgotten.
The gifts were generally placed in the hands of the
bailijflb, ministers, or churchwardens, occasionally of persons
specially appointed as trustees. After the change of the
form of government of the town, imder the act for the
reform of municipal bodies, the charities originally
intrusted to the bailifb for distribution were, upon the
petition of Shirley Palmer M.D., and James Jackson,
placed imder the administration of nine trustees, by an
order of one of the masters of the high court of Chan-
cery, dated the 24th of December, 1836, and confirmed
by the lord chancellor on the SSrd of February following.
The trustees nominated were, William Knight, John
Butler, Matthew Ingle, Francis Hunter, Richard Bar-
ratt, Samuel Hanson, Shirley Palmer M JD., Robert K.
Fallows, and Thomas Cox.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 451
The sources whence we have derived our informatioii
concerning the respective charities^ are the original
documents themselves^ or authenticated copies of them,
and a manuscript book entitled ^^A Collection of Per-
petual Gifts to the Town and Parish of Tamworth.
By Samuel Langley, Minister there. 1690 :" with con-
tinuations. We have also made use of the report of the
commissioners for inquiring into charities, published in 1825.
Henby Suckley's Gift.
By indenture made on the 24th of July, 1564, Henry
Buckley, citizen and merchant-tailor of London, a native
of Tamworth, and Agnes his wife, conveyed to John Topp,
his heirs and assigns for ever, after the death of the
survivor of the two, a messuage called the Ram, in
Watling-street, London; a messuage, garden, orchard,
and dove-house, at Corbetstye, in the parish of Up-
minster, Essex; and a messuage called Ryseley's, in
Upminster; to hold to the use and behoof of the poor
inhabitants of Tamworth, and of the adjoining hamlets.
John Topp should, at his cost, before the first day of
November ensuing, provide one good broad Kentish
woollen cloth, twenty-eight yards long or more, to be
woven with three threads through, being worth 6/., and,
sending it to Tamworth, divide it, in the presence of
the bailifb and conmionalty, amongst poor householders
of the town and hamlets. And before the first of
November, 1565, he was to provide canvas linen cloth
to the value of 6/. or more, to be divided into shirts,
smocks, kerchiefs, or aprons, and similarly distributed.
In 1566, the woollen was to be given away; in the
next year, the cloth; and so alternately for ever. The
sum of 188. 4d. was to be given yearly to such preacher
as should deliver a sermon on the 1st of November,
452 TAirWOKTH
between the hours of eight and eleven in the moming^
at the appointment of the dean and chapter of Lichfield ;
who covenanted to select a person for such purpose that
should deliver the gospel of Christ sincerely, purely, and
truly. If John Topp, or the future possessors of the
hereditaments, should neglect to supply the linen or
woollen, he or they should pay a fine of twenty marks
to the dean and chapter, for the first defiiult, to be
divided, within a month after the receipt, amongst the
poor of the town and hamlets, with the consent of the
bailifis and commonalty, ISs. 4d. being reserved for the
preacher: and on a second default, the dean and chapter
might take full possession of the property, and hold it
for the destined uses. If the dean and chapter, having
possession, should neglect any part of the covenant,
the bailifis and commonalty should complain to the
bishop, that he might compel them by ecclesiastical
censures to fulfil their duties. But if the bishop should
be negligent, they should "make humble petition, &
lamentable complaint, & lowly supplication," to the
lord chancellor of England to oblige the dean and
chapter. And the four parties concerned made promise
to each other that they would fiiithfully observe the
conditions, " on their fidelitys, fidths, & trouths to
Allmighty God, as they intend to be saued by the
merits of Christ's death, blood, & passion, at y* dread-
full day of judgment ; when no secrets of man's deeds
or acts wrought wrongfully shall be hid, but plainly
and apertly opened, disclosed, & revealed, for synne &
infidelity com'itted, perpetrated, & done.'*
This gift is still received, the sum of 6/. ISs. Ad.
being paid as a rent charge on two houses in Watling-
street, and on a fiEirm at Corbetstye, although the property
CASTLE AND TOWN. 453
at the latter place originally granted to John Topp,
cannot be identified. The alternate supply of cloth and
linen had been abandoned long before - the inquiry of
the GommiasionerSj in 1828. This gift is now at the
disposal of the Charity-trustees.
Fbteb Bbadock's Gift.
Peter Bradock^ saddler^ by will dated in 1594/ gave
6tf. 8dl to the poor in Tamworth^ yearly, for ever, issuing
out of a messuage in Church-lane. This was to be dis-
tributed yearly on Good Friday in boulted penny bread
to poor householders baring a charge.
Such are the statements in Langley's book ; but a note
in the same says that 13«. 4d. was the amount originally
bequeathed. It seems that afterwards the house was
formed into two tenements, whence, perhaps, half the
sum became lost. The gift is now extinct: and the
house charged with the payment cannot be identified
with certainty.
RiCHABD BePINGTON'S GiFT.
Bichard Bepington, esq., of Amington, by will dated
the SOth of August, 1609, bequeathed to his brother
Thomas Bejongton and to hb nephew John, son of
Thomas, 120/. to purchase, in fee-simple, so much lands
and hereditaments, as they and their heirs should out
of the rents pay 6/. annually to the relief of twenty poor
of the parish of Tamworth. To each of the poor, was
to be paid the sum of 5^., at the chapel of Great
Aming^n, upon the Friday befi>re Christmas-day, as the
donor had been accustomed to do : and 68. 8d. was to
be given to the reader of divine sendee in the chapel,
at that time. But if any of the poor persons should be
diubied finom attending, they should receive their pro-
1 He WM boiled at TMDWorth, on tliA srd oTDMembcr, 1898.
N 8
454 TAMWOBTH
portion at their own abode. The objects of the gift
should be those given to serve Gk)d and living in good
name and fiime; they should not be blasphemers, or
drunkards^ or disquiet persons, but of honest and godly
conversation, to the better example of others.
No land was purchased, but 5/. 6s. Sd. has been
annually paid to the vicar of Tamworth by the pro-
prietor of the land at Amington formerly belonging to
the testator. The 6/. is distributed equally amongst
the poor of Amington, Bolehall and Glascote, Tamworth,
and Wigginton; those of Amington receiving it at the
chapel.
John Wiohtwick's Gift.
John Wightwick, esq., of the Inner Temple, London,
by indenture dated the 7th of April, 1620, at the request
of his fieither William, granted to the bailifb and com-
monalty of Tamworth an annuity of 10«., issuing out
of five lands and one headland of arable ground in
Spittle-field, which he had bought of Nicholas Breton.
The first payment was to begin on the feast of St. Mi-
chael next after the decease of William Wightwick, and
to continue on that day for ever. The bailiffs should
yearly, on Gt>od Friday, distribute it equally amongst
thirty poor of the town. For every de&ult of payment,
after twenty days &om the feast, — the sum being
demanded at the house then inhabited by William
Wightwick, — John Wightwick, his heirs and assigns,
should forfeit to the use of the poor S«. 4d. : and the
bailiffi and commonalty might enforce payment by
distress.
The sum of 10«. is now received by the trustees
appointed in 1837.
castlb and town. 455
Stephen Bayly's Gift.
Stephen Bayly^ shepherd, of Tamhom, in Stafford-
shire, by will, dated the 1st of May, 1620, left to the
poor of Tamworth an annuity of 40^.. for ever, out of
his freehold lands at Tamhome called Crowlake, which
he bequeathed to Joan his wife for life, and then to
his brother's daughter, Avice Bayly, who had married
Richard Heely of Tamworth. The sum was to be paid
by equal portions on the feast of St. Michael, and that
of the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin St. Mary.
The bailifb were administrators of this gift; which
has passed to the Charity-trustees.
Thomas Cope's Gipt.
Thomas Cope, yeoman, of Wigj^inton, by his deed of
feoffment, dated the 5th of February, 1620-1, to Anticle
Willington, gent. ; Michael Vaughton, yeoman, of Wig-
ginton ; and other persons, gave 10«. a-year to ten poor
people of Tamworth, to be distributed by the feoffees
and their heirs, on Good Friday. Also he gaye 10^.
to be distributed by the same parties to as many poor
people in the lordship of Wigginton, on the Friday
before Christmas-day.
The two annuities of 10^. each are charged upon a
close in the manor of Bolehall, the owner of which
gives away the money, at pleasure.
Mabgabet Finney's Gift.
Margaret Finney alias Wade, of Eddiall, in Stafford-
shire, by her will of the 8th of February, 1623-4, gave
to the poor of Tamworth 4/., the interest of which was
to be distributed by the bailifib and her executors, to
the poorest householders in the parish, at 4c^. each,
upon the 23rd of December yearly. By indenture of
the 19th of March, 1624-5, her executors, Thomas
466 TAMWOBTH
Glazier, gent., of lichfield-closei and Hugh Deakin,
Benior, of Chorley, having paid over the sum, tnaafeired
all their power in the disposal to the bailiffs and
commonalty for ever.
How or when ihis gift was lost, we have not ascer-
tained. It is not mentioned by Langley.
Thomas Chbatle's Gift.
Thomas Cheade, gent, of WoKester, having consigned
to the bailifb and commonalty of Tamworth 1041.,
covenanted, by indenture made on the S2nd of Septem-
ber, 1627, that they should hold the sum to the
following uses. One hundred pounds should be let out,
from time to time, for ever, on good security, at four
per cent, to five or ten poor tradesmen, housekeepers,
artificers, inhabiting the town, clothiers and makers of
cloth of any sort, or such as should set the poor on
work by using their stock being especially preened.
The money, after repayment at the end of two or
three years, should be let out again in a similar manner.
The 4/. residue of the 1047. for the first year, and the
annual interest afterwards paid at the end of every year
to the bailifis, should be given annually on security to
a baker in the town, who, every month, counting twenty-
eight days to each, should deliver six dozen df good
bread to twenty-four poor peojde of the town and
parish selected by the bailiffs. The overplus of the 4£
and advantage of the poundage of the bread should be
allowed to the person appointed to superintend the
distribution of the loaves, and to keep a r^;ister-book
of it. The bailifis and commonalty agreed that if, at
any time, all or any part of the money should be lost,
they would supply the deficiency out of the town funds.
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 467
SO that the gift might continue ''w*Nmt dymynucon fsr
ever to all posterytie."
In 1750, only 18/. remained : it is conjectoied that
the rest was lost through insufficient securities.^ The
deficiency was never supplied: and this sum only came
to the Charity-trustees.
Henby Michsll's Gift.
Henry Michell, gent., of Tamworth, by his will made
on the Z2nd of May, 1629, bequeathed an annuity of
40«., out of his lands and hereditaments in the town,
and his bam and close adjoining to Stony-lane. Of
this, aOs. was to be given on every Good Friday equally
to forty of the poorest householders in Tamworth by
his executor, after her decease by his children residing
in the town, or else by the bailiffs. The other 20^.
was to be equally divided, at the same time, between
the curate and the schoolmaster. The bailifb should
have power of distress for the sum, or for any portion
remaining unpaid when due.
The disposal of this gift has been committed to the
Charity-trustees.
Sib John Febbebs's Gift.
Sir John Ferrers, knight, of Walton-upon-Trent, by
his will, dated the 2nd of April, 1630, bequeathed his
meadow-grounds, called Highfield-meadows, at Lea, in
the parish of Bradbume, Derbyshire, to sir John Re»
pington of Amington, sir Simon Archer, John lisle of
Moxall, and John Wightwick, and their heirs for ever,
that they, after his decease, should annually pay to the
bailifb of Tamworth out of the rents and profits 10/.,
1 In the return made to parliament relating to the beneCutiont, in 1780, it wai
stated that aU tat 18/. waa lott •< in pnmianoe of the direction of the donor*i wlIL"
We have not teen this docoment, so that we cannot vouch for the accnracj of this
curlona and obacore itatement*
458 TAXWOBTH
on or before the feast of St Thomas. The bailifi were,
that day, to distribute the money equally and indiffer-
ently amongst twenty of the poorest honseholders ' in
the town of Tangiworth, not common beggars.
Sir John Ferrers' donation is now in the hands of
the Charity-trustees.
Obsen's Gift.
The original document of this gift is not to be found,
and the date is unknown. In 1660, Henry Langley,
of Whittington, a very old man, certified that Green, a
tanner, gave 20^. a-year to the poor of Tamworth, tied
upon the house in lichfield-street, wherein Thomas
Gilbert lived, lately Mr. Bouse. Langley's grand-mother,
father, and mother, paid it whilst they resided there.
Samuel Langley says that Mr. Green charged upon the
house which had been Mr. House's, but in 1689 was
Mr. Gregg's, the payment of 13^. 4d. in bread to the
poor on St. Thomas' day or Good Friday.
Between 1778 and 1780, the payment was discon-
tinued. Although the house could be identified, the
conmiissioners, in 18S8, did not think that the gift
could be revived; so it is now lost
Edwabd Dratton's Gift.
Langley says that ^'Edward Drayton, Yinter, gaue
twenty shillings yearly to the poor of Tamworth tat
ever, issuing out of closes or lands in Fasely, called
Grosmore & Bely's Leap."
^'note. The Bayliffs of Tamworth do lease these
closes for 40 shillings per annum, and payment of the
Lord's Kent to Draiton Bassett: one twenty shillings
of this goes to Atherston, and the other to the
poor of Tamworth."
OA0TLB Am) TOWN. 459
The oxigmal deed of the gift cannot be found, and
nothing is known of the exact destination, except what
Mr. Langley has recorded. The bailifi acted as land-
lords, and, after paying 208. to the parish officers of
Atherstone, applied the rest to the use of the poor of
the town. About 181S, Gossmore-dose, previously let
for 4/. a-year, was exchanged with sir Robert Feel for
Ridge-lane close in Fazeley, containing about 3a., which
brought in double that amount of rent. Very nearly
at the same time, Bayley's Leap, preyiously let at 1/.
Is. per annum, was disposed of to the Coventry canal
company at a compensation rent of 1/. 6s. a-year.
The sums are still applied as was formerly done by the
bailiffi, by the Charity-trustees.
Lord Chesterfield's Gift.
Philip Stanhope, first earl jof Chesterfield, by inden-
ture of the d4th of May, 1639, delivered to the bailifb
and commonalty of Tamworth 85/., that, with the
interest, should be provided twenty-four loaves of the
coarser sort of bread, to be distributed monthly in the
Church, by the appointment of the earl and his coun-
tess,^ after their deceases by John Ferrers, esq., and
after him by the bailifb, to twenty-four inhabitants of
the Warwickshire part of the town nominated by them
as should have been at morning-prayer. And 12d. was
to be given to the officer distributing the bread.
This charity is extinct. The commissioners could not
learn what had become of the 85/. In the . return
made to parliament, in 1786, it was stated that the
sum appeared to have been lost through bad securities.
Henry Smithes Gift.
Robert Devereux, earl of Essex and Ewe, and others
1 Ann, widow of rir Humphry Fonra. See p. S7S.
460 TAMWOBTH
of the Burviying feoffees of Heniy Smith, esq., late of
SilverHBtreet, in London, deceased, — agreeable to the
powers reposed in them by several conreyances of
Henry Smith dated the 20th of October, 1620, the
12th of June, 1624, and the 21st of June, 1626,— by
deed of declaration of the uses of their trust, bearing
date the 20th of December, 1641, gaye to the church-
wardens and overseers of Tamworth, Lichfield, Stafford,
and Newcastle-under-Lyne, their portions of the manor
of Froddeswell, in Staffordshire, fiyr the benefit of the
poor, — to Tamworth, the annual sum of 14/.; to
Lichfield, 18/.; to Stafford, 14/.; and to Newcastle-
under-Lyne, 12/. The directions given by Henry Smith
in his deed of uses for the distribution of the sums
were these. The churchwardens and overseers, before
meddling with the receipt of the rent, should be bound
in double the value of the sum to the vicar of the
parish, to collect and bestow the same according as was
ordered; the vicar should certify the obligation uncan-
celled to the executors and feoffees: and in defitult,
the parish should lose the gift for that time. The
churchwardens and overseers were to distribute the
money for the relief of aged poor and infirm people,
nuurried persons having more children bom in lawful
wedlock than their labours could maintain, poor orphans,
poor people that kept themselves and their fiunilies to
labour, putting forth poor children as apprentices, mar-
rying poor maids, keeping a stock to set the -pwt to
work; and not to any given to excessive drinking,
whoremongers, common swearers, pilferers, or otherwise
notoriously scandalous, or to any incorrigible persons,
disobedient servants, vagrant persons, or such as have
no constant dwelling, receive inmates to live with them,
CASTLE AND TOWN. 461
or have not inhabited the parish for five years preceding
the distribution^ or to any persons refusing to work^
labour^ and take pains. The churchwardens and over-
seers should^ once every month at least, upon the
Sabbath, after evening prayer, meet in the Church, in
order to consider the state of the poor, and who most
needed relief; and between Easter and Whitsuntide, they
should openly in the Church, after evening prayer, on
a Sabbath, — ^notice having been given at the end of the
morning prayer preceding, — ^make an account, in a &irly
vrritten book, of all receipts and disbursements in the
past year. The account should be read in the Church
on the next Sabbath, after morning prayer; a copy of
which should be affixed to a table on the wall of the
Church, in some convenient place, there to remain for
fourteen days, so that it might be publicly read, and
exceptions taken if there should be just cause, in order
to make amendments. This or another copy should be,
within ten days after the fortnight, delivered to the
vicar, and others to the executors and feoffees. If the
churchwardens and overseers should fail in the perfor-
mance of any of these directions, the poor should lose
the gift for one year, and it should then go to Christ's
hospital, in London. The money given to impotent
and aged poor should be distributed in apparel of one
colour, with some badge that the same might be
known to be the gift of Henry Smith ; or else in bread
and flesh or fish upon each Sabbath, publicly in the
Church.
The manor of Froddeswell was purchased by the earl
of Essex and the other feoffees, with part of the
personal estate of Henry Smith. The annual sum of
1^. is now received by the churchwardens of Tamworth,
oS
462 TAMWOBTH
from the right hon. sir Robert Peel, hart, as a rent-
charge upon his manor of Drayton-Basset.
Sib Francis Nethebsole's Gift.
Sir Francis Nethersole, who died in 1659, by a
codicil to his will, appointed, at the request of Thomas
Fox, that 5/. should be paid yearly to the schoolmaster
of Tamworth, on condition that children of Polesworth
and Wareton desirous of learning the Latin and GredL
tongues, — so that they did not exceed six at one time,
and were approved by his trustees,— should be taught
those languages at the Grammar School as freely as
any of the town.
This sum is received by the Charity-trustees from the
treasurer of sir Francis Nethersole's charity, at Poles-
worth.
RiCHABD VaUGHTON's GiFT.
Richard Vaughton, yeoman, of Tamworth, by his
will dated the 28th of August, 1665, bequeathed to the
bailiffs and commonalty and their successors iOs,, to be
paid yearly out of his pasture called Gorsty-Perrycrofis,
in Bolehall, on Candlemas-day; with power of entry
and distress to the bailifib and commonalty, in case of
default. They were to distribute the sum amongst the
poor of the town, within eight days after the payment,
at the direction of his executors, and of his four trustees
named during their lives; and after the decease of all,
by the baili£& of Tamworth.
The Charity-trustees now receive and distribute the
money.
William Ashley's Gift.
William Ashley, gent., of Spinkefield, Essex, a native
of Tamworth, by his will, dated the 24th of July, 1666,
bequeathed towards the maintenance of the master ^of
CASTLE AND TOWN. 468
the Free Granmiar School^ the annual rent of 10/. out
of his lands called Jenkin-Malden^ in Essex. The first
payment was to be made twelve months after the
decease of his wife^ and was then to continue for ever.
The annuity is still received.
Kathebine Bttdd's Gift.
Katherine Budd^ widow^ by will, signed on the 17th
of May^ 1667^ bequeathed to William Cornish, Joseph
Batman, James Trubshaw, and Nicholas Parker, — ^her
executors and overseers, — all her lands in Baxterley,
which she had purchased of Edward Swinfen, of Bad-
desley. Her executors and their heirs should set the
premises to the best advantage, and deliver the profits,
as they became due, to the minister of the Church of
Tamworth, to serve for his better maintenance and
encouragement. But if this gift should be looked
upon as mortmain, the premises should remain to her
executors and overseers, and their heirs.
The value of the donation is stated, on one of the
tablets in the Church, to have been five shillings a-year,
in 1726. There is no mention of it in the return to
parliament concerning charities, in 1786, or in the
commissioners' report of 1825.
Richard Bbabdslet's Gift.
Richard Beardsley, gent., of Tamworth, by his will,
dated the 1st of June, 1669, bequeathed to Samuel
Langley, then minister, and to Nicholas Parker, and
their heirs, a cottage and garden in Tamworth, with
40/. to purchase more lands, upon trust, that, supposing
the rents should amount to 6/. per annum, they should
pay to the mimster, poor, and schoolmaster severally 40s.
a-year, as the rents became due; but each of the three
464 TAMWOBTH
parties should bear equally the increase or decrease
of the income.
The trustees with the 40/. purchased Further Kettle-
brook-dose, in Wilnecote.
Elizabbth Bbarimlet's Gift.
Elizabeth Beardsley, widow of Richard, by wiD,
dated the ISth of September, 1670, left to Samuel
Langley and Nicholas Parker 10/. to be laid out with
the 40/. bequeathed by her late husband, the whole of
the profits to be given solely to the poor, as Bichard
Beardsley had directed the 40«. to be distributed.
The trustees purchased the Nearer Kettlebrook-doee.
This gift and the previous one are now amalgamated ;
and no distinction is known between the two Kettle-
brook-closes. There is no cottage in Tamworth
attributed to these charities, but the two houses
assigned to the next gift are conjectured to have
belonged to them. The close containing Sa. S8/»., at
the time of the enquiry of the commissioners, was let
at the annual rent of 6/. 6«. For a portion of the land
of Ir. SSp., the Coventry canal company, who had
taken it, paid a compensation of 1/. Ss. 5d. The vicar
and town-clerk have always acted as trustees, making
equal division of the sums, the part for the poor being
distributed by the minister and churchwardens.
John Yaughton's Gift.
John Vaughton, known in his life-time as '^ Whistling
John," left by will, in 1683, a croft in Gimgate, the
rent to be equally divided between the minister, school-
master, and poor children of Tamworth to set them to
work or apprentice.
The property considered to be attached to this gift,
consists of Chamberlain's croft of about half an acre, two
CASTLE AND TOWK. 465
houses in Spizmingschool-lane, and Barber's croft of about
l^a. adjoining to Gkmgate. It is probable that a
part belonged to some other charity. In 1795^ the
property was divided^ the minister taking Chamberlain's
croft^ and the schoolmaster Barber's croft^ the two houses
being assigned to the churchwardens for the poor. But
they were again united, and placed under the manage-
ment of the churchwardens.
When the commissioners made their enquiries, the
crofts were let for 181. a-year, and the two houses for
5/. 48. After deducting 8«. 6d. for land-tax and stamps,
the money was divided equally amongst those for whom
it was destined.
Sib Henry Gottgh's Giff.
Sir Henry Gough, knt., of Perry-hall, in Staffordshire,
by indentures of the 19th and 20th of July, 1686,
purchased of Richard Weaman twelve lands and two
headlands lying together in Flaxhill-field, in Wigginton,
called Hungerhill. And by indentures of the 19th
and SOth of October following, he conveyed the same
to sir Edward Littleton, bart., and Mr. Devereux
Littleton, and their heirs, to dispose of the rents and
profits for the poor of Tamworth, to be distributed on
St. Thomas' day, every year, after the next ensuing
feast of that saint. If there should be £Eiilure after
that day, the baili£b, churchwardens, and overseers of
the poor, might make the distribution.
By award of the commissioners under the act for
enclosing the open fields in the manor of Comberford
and Wigginton or prebends of Wigginton and Coton,
dated the 19th of April, 1771, there was allotted to
Stanford Wolverstan, esq., who had married the heiress
of Devereux Littleton, an enclosure of 2a. Sr. 2Xp. ;
466 TAMWOBTH
the profits of which are now distriboted, aocording to
the direction of the donor, by hiB grandson, Stanley
Pipe Wolverstan, esq., of Statfold-hall.
Rxv. John Kawlbt's Gift.
John Bawlet/ derk, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, by will,
dated the gSrd of September, 1686, bequeathed to his
mother, Mrs. Margaret Rice, a messuage in Church-lane
which he had bought of Henry Davis, yielding a rent
of S/. ; also a messuage and lands purchased of George
Wright, and yielding annually about 102. 5i., for her
natural life. To Mistress Anne Butler, of Newcastle,
he gaye for life all the lands and messuages in the
parish of Tamworth, purchased of George Sadler, and
then leased for 10/. 10^. a-year. Afler their deceases,
he bequeathed the same to his &ther-in-law William
Rice, Samuel Langley, Nicholas Parker, and Joseph
Batman, their heirs and assigns for eyer, upon trust
that they should dispose of the profits to the following
uses. To Mrs. Hannah White, 6/. a-year should be
given, if she were not competently provided for ; to the
minister of the Church, 4/., half to be given on Good
Friday and half on the 6th of November, if he should
preach a sermon on each of those days; to the school-
master of Tamworth, 40s. for ever ; for putting out two
boys yearly to some trade, 81.; for instructing ten
poor children of the town in English, 40s. ; and what
remained should be distributed, as far as it would go,
on Good Friday, 12d. a-piece, to the poorest femilies of
the town. After the death of Hannah White, 4/. of
her annuity should be applied in apprenticing another
poor boy yearly; and the 40s. residue should buy ten
1 TlM bittonr of this clamrmaa is singalar. He slgntd his wffl on the numdey,
being " in perfect heelth & soundness of body & minde;" on Satordajr. he manied
Anne Butler i but on the Mondnr fSaUowing, the 97th of September, he was dead.
CASTLE AND TOWK. 467
bibles every year ^ to be giyen to the ten poor scholars
when they could read them, or to any other poor family
that would make use of them. Moreoyer, if the minis-
ter and schoolmaster should think his books worthy of
acceptance, and would fix them in some room belonging
to the School or other convenient place, that they might
be preserved for the use of the succeeding schoolmasters
and scholars, and might serve as an encouragement to
others to make additions, so that there might be a
public library for the benefit of scholars in the town,
he fireely bestowed all his books upon the School:
otherwise he gave them to Margaret Bice and Anne
Butler, to dispose of them as they pleased. And the
testator directed that, upon the death of any trustee,
the survivors should, within six or seven months, make
choice of another, the original number not being ex-
ceeded, and settle the premises on themselves and those
chosen, firom time to time: and they should allow
themselves all necessary charges out of the property.
In the course of years, the property belonging to this
charity became greatly augmented. In 1818, the pre*
mises were as follows. In Tamworth, — two houses with
gardens of lip. each, in Church-lane, erected on the site
of three old ones comprised in the will, in 1809, at an
expense of 240/.; and three messuages, one with a
garden of dp., in Gungate, which, by indentures of
lease and release, dated the 19th and 20th of June,
1797, were conveyed by sir Bobert Feel and his trustee
William Tates to the trustees of John Bawlet, in
exchange for two small messuages and garden-ground in
the same street belonging to the charity : in the lord-
ship of Wigginton, — ^lands allotted under the endosiure
act for those named in the will, which were the Slang
468 TAMWOBTH
of 2a. 4p., Windmill-close of 4a. lip., Ball's close of
6a. 20p., the Biddens of 4a. Ir. VJp., the same of 4a.
Ir. Sitp., and Robin Hood's butt of 4a. ir. Up.: in
the lordship of Bolehall and Glascote^ — Poors' dose of
2a. 8r., land taken by the Coventry canal company of
If. 4p.f garden ground of 4C^.^ and Glascote-close of
8a. 19p. awarded to the trustees under agreement of the
9th of December, 1808, between the proprietor of, and
persons interested in, the open field and other lands,
in lieu of selions of land dispersed over them. The
whole brought in a rent of 109/. lis 6d.
The utility of this charity extended with the property.
The number of apprentices put out every year was in-
creased to three and then to four; and, in 1815, it was
agreed to give 8/. with each, instead of 4/. The ten
poor girls have been taught reading and needle-work by
a mistress, who at first received 2/. as an annual salary,
increased, in 1800, to 4/., and, in 1815, to 5/. A
sum is now paid to the National School for the free
education of such. An additional school was begun
about 1802, for the instruction of twelve boys, a master
being appointed with IS/, a-year for his trouble, untQ
it was raised to 20/., in 1815. The boys, chosen by
the trustees at about ten years of age, are taught for
about three years, when they may be apprenticed,
usually by the aid of this charity. The number of
bibles prescribed in the will has been distributed. From
1802, the sum of 10/., and firom 1815, 15/. has been an-
nually given to sixty of the poorest families in the town«
Mr. Rawlet's library was accepted by the minister
and schoolmaster. Thomas Guy gave a room in his
Almshouses for their reception, which was fitted up, in
1688, for the purpose, at a cost of 10/. 19s. 4d. raised
CASTLE AND TOWN. 469
by public subscription. Two rooms^ it seems^ were
subsequently used. The present schoolmaster^ a few
years ago, with the concurrence of the yicar, remoyed
the library to the Grammar School. A portrait of the
donor is preserved there.
William Sthond's Gift.
William Symond, mercer, of Atherstone, in War-
wickshire, bequeathed, in 1687, by will, all his enclosed
lands at Twycross, in Leicestershire, which he had
bought of Henry Budley, and three closes there bought
of John Wheewell, producing an annual rent of 14/.;
also the yearly sum of 5/. paid out of several grounds
in Mancetter, occupied by Mrs. Hester Thornton,
in lieu of tithes charged upon them: which sums
of 14/., or so much as could be raised for the grounds
at Twycross, and 5/. should be employed yearly, after
his death, in apprenticing to good and lawful trades
the children of poor men in Atherstone, Tamworth, and
Nuneaton, such as could read the bible, and whose
parents received no monthly collection from the towns.
The apprentices on being put forth should have a bible
and one of the assembly's catechisms of the larger sort
bought out of the money for them by the churchwardens
or overseers of the towns. The income, as it became
due, should be annually received by the churchwardens
or overseers of Atherstone, and should be equally divi-
ded into three parts, and the due proportions sent to
the churchwardens of Nuneaton and Tamworth, to be
employed for the uses expressed, all charges and neces-
sary expences of the collecting and receiving being first
deducted*
The value of this charity is now more than doubled,
producing, in 1823, 14/. Is. 6d. paid to the church-
F 3
470 TAMWORTH
wardens of Tamworth bj those of Atherstone, to be
appropriated according to the donor's will. Bibles and
catechisms haye not been nsnally gtren.
Ann Osbuen's Gift.
Mrs. Anne Osbum, widow^ of the Greorge Inn^ in this
town^ by will, bearing date the 7th of November, 1688,
bequeathed to the bailifi and their successors, 5/., the
interest to be employed, for ever, towards buying mate-
rials, or in some other good way, to set poor children
to work in the Spinning-school. The interest should
be disposed of as Mr. Langley and Mr. Nicholas Parker
should approve as the most likely to perpetuate so
useful and good a work ; and, after their deceases, by
the bailiffs and their successors for ever. But if the
School should not continue, the interest should be given
to the poor of Tamworth in bread, in the Church, after
morning prayer, on the Sunday before Christmas-day
yearly.
The gift is united with that of Elizabeth Michell
following.
RsBECCA Michell's Gift.
By will dated the 9th of April, 1689^ Bebecca
Michell bequeathed to the poor of the borough of Tam-
worth 501., to be paid, by her executor, within twelve
months after her decease, to Mr. Langley or his suooeaaor
in the ministry, to be set forth at interest in safe hands.
The proceeds yearly should be distributed by the minister
and churchwardens amongst the poor inhabitants of the
borough.
This SO/, was laid out, with lady Clobury's gift, in
the purchase of lands, and a third of the rents appro-
priated to the intentions of Rebecca Michell.
castle and town. 471
Elizabbth Michell's Gift.
Elizabeth Michelle younger sister of Rebecca^ by will
dated the I9th of August, 1690, gave 50/. to the poor
of the parish of Tamworth.
This sum was equally divided between the town and
the hamlets, and the portion assigned to the latter
distributed by the churchwardens or overseers amongst
the poor. The other 25/., with the 5/. left by Ann
Osbum, and 5/. two years' interest on the gift of
Kebecca Michell, was laid out in the purchase of a
piece of ground in Beckmore-meadow of la. Ir. 20p.,
in the lordship of Wigginton, which Nicholas Parker
conveyed to the baiUfb and commonalty, by indentures
of lease and release made on the 18th and 19th of
March, 1691-2, in trust, to apply the rents and profits
as was most agreeable to the wills of Elizabeth Michell
and Ann Osbum, — six parts to be disposed of yearly
by the bailifb and churchwardens pursuant to the
directions of the former donor, and the remaining
seventh, according to the desires of the latter. This
land, then let for Zls. 6c/. a-year was, by indenture of
the 1st of August, 1758, exchanged with Samuel
Beardsley for some ground in Broad-meadow, Wigginton,
of la., but bringing in a rent of 30«., and lying nearer
to the town than Beckmore-meadow.
The land belonging to the united gifts, now held by
the Charity-trustees, is a close in Wigginton of la. lip.
assigned under the Wigginton enclosure act of 1771,
and let for about 5/. yearly.
Elizabeth Welch's Gift.
Elizabeth Welch, widow, by her will, dated the 1st
of February, 1692-3, bequeathed to the baili£& and their
successors 10/., to purchase land or set out to interest;
472 TAMWORTH
and with the profits^ as they came in, to buy English
bibles and distribute them amongst such poor of Tam-
worth as would be likely to make the best use of them.
After those wanting bibles should have been supphed,
the profits should be laid out to help to apprentice
poor children, or for bread to be distributed to the poor
of Tamworth in the Church, or to uses most advan-
tageous to the poor. And the donor desired Mr.
Langley and Mr. Nicholas Parker to see her gift care-
fully executed, so long as either lived.
This charity is lost.
Samuel Lakolet's Gift.
Lamuel Langley, clerk, of Bolehall, by will dated the
4th of September, 1698, bequeathed to the bailifb and
commonalty 5/., the interest to go to assist the Work-
house-school for poor children, if needed ; but if the
School should fail, to the poor of the town, to be
distributed yearly by the baili£b.
The gift is lost.
Ladt Clobukt's Gift.
Dame Ann Clobury, in 1698, placed in the hands of
Samuel Collins, minister of Tamworth, and of Nicholas
Parker, 100/., to be laid out in lands which should be
conveyed in trust to Charles Holt, baronet, of Aston,
near Birmingham, to G^rge Alsop, and to themselves.
The profits should be distributed for the relief of poor
decayed housekeepers, and also widowers and widows
within the town of Tamworth, such who had been
labourious in their lives, and of honest conversation and
good report, but by old age, sickness, lameness, great
charge of children, or extraordinary losses, should have
been brought to poverty; but not to common beg-
gars, or such as received weekly allowance constantly
CASTLE AND TOWN. 473
from the town ; nor should any family or person receive
above 10s, in one year. And if convenient^ once in
seven years^ half of the rents should be expended to
buy English bibles for distribution amongst poor fiimilies
and persons of the town not able to obtain such^ who
should be likely to make the best use of them. When
any two of the four trustees should be dead^ then those
remaining should^ within three months^ grant the pre-
mises the use of themselves and two others; of whom
the heir male of sir Charles Holt^^ and the minister of
Tamworth should always be two.
Lady Clobury's gift of 100/. and Rebecca MicheU's
gift of 50/. were united in one purchase. By indentures
of lease and release dated the Ist and 2nd of September^
in the same year^ Samuel Collins and Nicholas Parker
conveyed the premises which they had bought^ — stated
to have been, a messuage, a bay and a half of baming
at the end of the bam next the messuage, a cow-house
adjoining the bay of baming, two sheds next the bam
used as swine-sties, eight ridges of land and one hemp-
leek in the Over-field, ten other ridges of land in the
Nether-field, twelve more in the same field, and
several parcels of meadow called Broad-moor and Hell-
rood, in Hollymoor-meadow, all situated in Glascote, —
to Bdward Symonds and Edward Bradgate, to the use
of SIT Charles Holt, Greorge Alsop, and of themselves,
and their heirs, upon trust that they should yearly
employ two-thirds of the rents and profits of the
premises in the manner prescribed by lady Clobury,
and permit the vicar and churchwardens to dispose of
the other third as Rebecca Michell had directed.
In 182S, the lands belonging to these charities con-
1 The male ttoe is now extinct.
474 TAHWO&TH
siBted of a house divided into two tenements^ kt for
1/. 10$. each; two fields of 7a. S^. allotted to the
trustees on the enclosure of Glascote, in 1811, in lieu
of the lands dispersed in the open fidds, let at an
annual rent of 20/. ; a field of la. 3r. 7/>. allotted
on the enclosure of Glascote, in lieu of oonunon
right, and let for 81. ; and 1/. 9s. Id. paid by the Co-
ventry canal company for land of la. 1^. taken by
them in 1787. The third appropriated to Rebecca
Michell's charity, being divided into three parts between
the minister and two churchwardens, was distributed by
them as they saw occasion.
Walter Ashmorb's Gift.
Walter Ashmore, gent., by his will dated the 8th of
September, 1701, bequeathed to the bailifEs, minister,
and churchwardens, and their successors, two cottages
in Gungate, on the Staffordshire side, to hold for ever
to these uses. They should pay to the diurchwardens
6s. a*year for setting the cottages, taking the profits,
and entering the same in their book of accounts; 194.
to be spent by the bailifb, mimster, and churchwardens
on the meeting, every half-year, to dispose of the same ;
and the residue to be given to the poorest widows and
fiimilies in Tamworth, not receiving common contribution,
by lid. each, every half-year. The churchwardens
should register in their book the names of such widows
and families, that those who did not receive the sum
one year might the next. No distribution of the rents
should be made except by the parties named, of whom
the minister should be one.
The cottages having fallen into decay, a lease of the
land was granted by the minister and churchwardens,
for ninety-nine years, firom the 25th of March, 1771, at
CA8TLB AND TOWN. 475
the annual rent of 18s., the lessee covenanting to build
two new cottages.
Samuel Port's Gift.
Samuel Port,, joiner or lorrimer, of London, by his
will dated the 24th of July, 1705, gave to Joseph Stone,
citizen and grocer of London, 400/., upon trust that he
should, after the testator's death, with the approbation
of his wife, lay out the sum to purchase lands in or
near Tamworth, in fee-simple, and settle the same upon
five or more good and able persons of the town nom-
inated by Joseph Stone, and their heirs and assigns
for ever: upon trust that they should permit his wife
Anne Port to take the rents. And, after her decease,
they should permit the minister and two bailiffs to
receive the issues ; who should apply the whole, except
20«., for apprenticing in London to some honest trade,
two poor boys bom in Tamworth. Of the 20^., one
half was to be spent yearly in a dinner or other accom-
modation for the managers of the charity, and the
other half to be paid to the minister, to read his will
in relation to the gift, and to preach a sermon once
a-year. But if the bailiff and ministers should neglect
to perform the will, then the profits of the estate might
be demanded by the mimster and churchwardens of St.
Mary Somerset, London, to be employed in a similar
manner.
The legacy was laid out in the purchase of lands at
Amington and Stonydelph, Hopley close, the Nether-
close, four acres in Stonydelph field, and a piece of
1 This pcnon, it U uld, mm a foundling, being ditoovend dtsoted in th« porch
of Tunworth-Chnrdi. He mm broaght up at the expense at the perish, and recdyed
the nme of Porch, which he afterwards conTCtted into Fort. He was apprenticed
to a joiner J and, being saocessfol in life, he left this gift to the town as a return
tat the Undnew which he had oiperieaoed.
476 TAMWOBTH
land in Far meadow. These were snrreyed in 1821»
and then stated to be as follows: — Fleck, on the south
side of the Coventry canal, of 7p. used as a garden; a
bam, fold, and rick-yard of Ir. VJp. ; the FhiUy-moor
of 11a. Ip.; Amington-meadow of Sr. SOp.; lower and
upper Hopley closes of 5a. Ir. 9p.; Rotter's field of
Sa. Ir. S^. ; the Segs or Stonydelph-flat of Sa. Sr. S7p.
These were let, in 1823, for 45/. The Coventry canal
company paid 1/. 18s. 9d. a-year for land of 8r. lOp.
taken out of Hopley-close. Owing to unapplied surplus
of income, there was then belonging to this charity
1,864/. 165. three per cent consols, in the names of
the trustees, and 50/. placed on the security of the toUs
of the Tamworth turnpike road, at five per cent, making
a total income of 88/. 8^. 10c/. A premium of 40/.
was given with each apprentice; but it was found
difficult, even for that sum, to procure good masters.
Ann Willinoton's Gift.
Ann Willington, by will, in 1711, bequeathed 40/.,
the interest to be given to the poor of the town, by
the minister and churchwardens.
This gift is extinct, as the sum was lost by the in-
solvency of the vicar, the rev. George Antrobus, when
he died in 1724.
Thomas Willington's Gift.
On the tablet of 1726 in the Church, it is recorded
that Thomas Willington, gent., gave the interest of 5/.
to the poor of the town. This is all we have found
concerning the gift; which has been long lost.
Thomas Blood's Gift.
Thomas Blood, by will, dated the 14th of January,
1724, bequeathed to Thomas Mousley and four others
100/., in trust, to place the same out and pay the
CASTLE AND TOWN. 477
interest to his aunt^ the wife of Joseph Bloody during
her life ; and after her death, either to the under-curate
of Tamworth, or to any other charitable uses they
should think fit. He also bequeathed to the same
persons an additional 100/., to be placed out in the same
manner, and the interest paid yearly to twenty poor
housekeepers of the borough of Tamworth, not receiving
weekly pay. And the testator required of the trustees
that, after the death of any of them, they should choose
another in his stead.
With the two sums, was purchased a close caUed the
Perrycroft containing Sa. Sr. 2Qp., in the liberty of
Bolehall; which, in 1823, produced an annual rent of
16/. The land-tax was redeemed^ in 1799, for 16/. 4s.
7Jc/.
Christian Orton*s Gift.
Mrs. Christian Orton, by will, in 1736, left 201, the
interest to be giyen annually to six poor widows of
Tamworth.
The money was lent to the trustees of the Tamworth
turnpike roads : and the master of the Grammar School
has always received and applied the charity, by what
authority does not appear, as no copy of the will exists
in Tamworth.
Earl of Northampton's Gift.
Of the institution of this charity, we have spoken in
our account of the Workhouse. The premises, no longer
used for the poor, were let, and the rent distributed by
the minister, bailifb, and town-clerk, to the poor in the
borough of Tamworth and liberty of the Castle.
Mrs. Harcourt's Gift.
Mrs. Harcourt, by will, the date of which is unknown,
but which must have been between 1726 and 1786,
qS
478 TAMWORTH
gave an annuity of 1/. Is. Sd., charged upon lands at
Fillongley, to the hailiflb, to be by them distributed in
coals and bread amongst twenty poor widows of Tain-
worthy on St. Thomas' day.
This gift is now in the hands of the Charity-trustees.
Mabquis of Bath's Gift.
An annuity of 10/. is received, on Old St. Thomas'
day, from the bankers of the marquis of Bath, and paid
in equal portions to two school-mistresses, for teaching
eight young children to read and knit.
The origin of this charity, and the property in respect
of which it is paid, are unknown. It has been imagined
that it might possibly hare been founded by Thomas
viscount Weymouth, in 1686. This, however, we do
not believe, as the gift would certainly have been then
known to Langley. It is not mentioned in the tablets
placed in the Church, or in the return to parliament
in 1786.
Elizabeth Beabdslet's Gift.
Elizabeth Beardsley, widow, by will, dated the SOth
of October, 1772, bequeathed 50/. which her late husband
had lent, on the 8rd of July, 1760, to the trustees of
the road leading from Tamworth to Ashby-de-la-Zouch,
and from Sawrey-ferry to Swarcliff-lane, upon the credit
of the tolls, which belonged to her as executrix and
residuary legatee; also two sums of 25/. each lent by
her, on the 5th of May and Slst of October, 1761, to
the trustees of certain roads in the counties of Derby,
Leicester, and Warwick, and amongst them of one from
Tamworth to Fieldon or Feland-bridge and from thence
to Measham, secured on the tolls; with all interest
which might be due at her decease, to the bailifb and
their successors, in trust, that they, either continuing
CASTLE AND TOWN. 479
the same securities^ or calling in the sums for reinvest-
ment or purchase of fireehold property, shoidd expend
the profits in bread, to be distributed in the Church,
amongst poor housekeepers of Tamworth, every Whit-
sunday and Christmas day, as they should think proper.
And she willed that the interest due at her decease
shoidd be disposed of amongst poor housekeepers, as the
bailifb should deem fit.
At a meeting of the commissioners of the roads held
on the 27th of November, 1781, S6l. due on the 10th
of October, 1778, for the two sums of 251. each was
added to the principal, making 85/. seciired upon the
tolls. The executor of Mrs. Beardsley assigned all the
securities to the bailiff, on the 6th of June, 1782.
This gift is now administered by the Charity-trustees.
Elizabeth Matthews' Gift.
Mrs. Elizabeth Matthews, by deed poll of the 9th of
November, 1786, gave to George Godfrey, and, after
his decease, to the churchwardens, an assignment of the
tolls on the Tamworth turnpike road, for securing 20/. ;
that out of the interest they should pay to the minister
lOs. on the 6th of January yearly, for reading prayers
and the communion-service, and preaching in the Church
on that day; 5s. to John Scott, parish-clerk, and after
his death, Zs. 6d. to his successors; 28. 6d. to the
organist; and the residue to purchase bread for distri-
bution in the Church, on the same day yearly, amongst
such poor widows of the borough as should attend the
service in the Church : with power to alter the securities.
The interest of the money is applied as directed; but
the payments are made on Midlent Sunday, no congre-
gation attending on the 5th of January.
480 tamworth
Mart Donbs' Gift.
By indenture^ dated the 24th of June^ 1788, Mrs.
Mary Dones assigned to Thomas Bradley Paget and
Greorge Godfrey 50/. lent by her to the trustees under
an act, 10 Geo. III., for repairing and widening the
roads leading through the borough of Tamworth, and
others in the counties of Stafford, Warwick, and Derby,
upon security of an assignment of tolls; the interest
to be paid to the committee appointed to manage the
Sunday-schools in Tamworth, in aid of the oontributicms
for the support of them. But if, from any cause, there
should not be a Sunday-school in Tamworth for poor
children supported by voluntary subscriptions, then the
interest should bo disposed of to educate so many poor
children of the borough, either boys or girls, whose
parents should have legal settlement here, as the profits
of the 50/. would suffice for. After the death of Mr.
Paget and Mr. Godfrey, the sum and security should
be transferred to the master of the Grrammar School and
the churchwardens, upon the same trusts: with power
to change the security.
The trust was thus transferred by indenture dater
the 5th of August, 1819.
Mary Dones also, by her will, dated the 24th of July^
1795, gave to Thomas Willington 60/. to pay the same
to the master of the Grrammar School and to the church-
wardens, who should put the sum out to interest, and
from the produce pay to the minister 10«. on the Ist of
January, every year, to preach a sermon in the Church
on that day, occasionally explaining therein the nature
and design of baptism, that poor people might be rightly
informed of its use and importance, and to purchase
bread with the residue and distribute it in the Church,
CASTLB AND TOWN. 481
on the same day> amongst the poor attending the
whole of the service^ principal r^ard being paid to the
aged and those having large fEunilies. If the minister
should not preach the sermon, the 10«. should be dis-
tributed with the remainder of the interest.
Mrs. Dones, moreover, bequeathed to Thomas Wil-
lington 100/. which she had lent on an assignment of
the tolls of the Tamworth turnpike roads, to pay the
interest to her tenant, Jenny Baker, during her natural
life : and after her death, to transfer the sum and security
to the master of the Grammar School and churchwardens,
who should apply the interest either in putting out
children of the poor inhabitants as apprentices, or in
such manner as they should think proper for the benefit
of the poor of the borough.
The legacy of 60/. was invested in the purchase of
100/. three per cent consols. The time of distribution
was altered to Midlent Sunday, on account of the want
of a congregation on New-year's day, and the distribution
of the bread was made by orders given to bakers, because
of the creation of some disturbance in the Church,
•from the number of the poor. The annuitant, Jenny
Baker, died about 1824.
Mary Wilson's Gift.
Mrs. Mary Wilson, who died in April, 1805, be-
queathed 200/. to the vicar and churchwardens, to
distribute part in money amongst poor housekeepers
residing in the borough, as they should think proper.
The remainder of the sum was to be applied for the
benefit of such other poor persons residing in the borough
as the vicar and churchwardens might deem the greatest
objects of charity, by providing them with bibles, bed
ding, provisions, or other necessaries; also in putting
482 TAKWOBTH
out poor children of the borough apprentices to some
useful trade, under sober masters of good character.
The sum of 1641., the remainder having been distri-
buted to the poor in clothes and bedding, was iuTCSted,
on the 19th of January, 1808, in the purchase of 200/.
four per cent stock; and the interest is employed in
apprenticing boys.
Joseph Knight's Gift.
Mr. Joseph Knight, by his will, dated the 14th
of March, 1829, gave the sum of 1001. to be invested
in government or other real securities, in England, in
the name of the bailiffs of the borough of Tamworth,
that they, and their successors for ever, should receive
the interest and distribute it in equal proportions
amongst ten decayed housekeepers of the borough of
Tamworth, such as had been principals in business and
were most deserving : the same to be paid in money on
the day immediately preceding the old market
Mr. Knight died in 1838; and the municipal
corporation act having displaced the baihffi, the sum
was invested in the S per cent consols, in the names
of Bobert Fowler, John Hall, and Mary Grodwin Hall,
who regularly pay over the interest to the Mayor for
the time being, to distribute amongst the ten parties
described, in sums of 6«. 8c^. each.
THE TOWN HALL.
There were anciently in Tamworth two public Halls,
which were appropriated to the use of the governing
bodies of the town. One situated nearly at the top
of lichfield-street, served for the Staffordshire part ; the
other, in Market-street, for the Warwickshire side.
After Elizabeth had granted her charter of incorporation
to the inhabitants, the latter fell at length into disuse.
From the reign of Charles I., the other was let out by
the corporation, from time to time, to different private
individuals, who converted it to various uses ; a room, it
seems, serving, when needed, for public purposes. But,
in 1700, it was granted on a lease of ninety-nine years
at an annual rent of 82s. to Richard Russell, on con-
dition that he should, within one year, pull the whole
down, and erect a good and substantial brick house in
the place. In the indenture, dated the 11th of November,
the Hall, with a garden and orchard, is described as
being situated on the south side of Lichfield-street,
adjoining the messuage of Richard Weaman on the
east side, that of John Banks on the west, and abutting
on the orchard of the right hon. lord viscount Wey-
mouth.'
The only clue we have hitherto found directing us
to the situation of the Warwickshire HaU, is an inden-
1 Indenture, 1700.
484 TAMWORTH
ture, dated the Slst of September, 1604, witnessing that
Francis Freddeton had sold to sir Humphry Ferrers a
messuage in Market-street, between the Town-hall on
the east side and the street-way leading out of Tam-
worth towards Lady-bridge on the west.* The edifice,
therefore, would appear to have been where part of the
King's Arms Hotel now stands.
The destruction of the Staffordshire Hall was conse-
quent upon the offer of Mr. Thomas Guy, the fi^under
of the Almshouses, to build, at his own expense, a new
edifice in the Market-place, for the use of the corporation.
So liberal and generous a proposal on the part of their
parliamentary representative, was eagerly accepted by
the bailiffs and commonalty. In order that the new
Town-hall might stand unattached in the middle of the
Market-place, they made several exchanges of property
for the houses adjacent to the intended site. Lord
viscount Weymouth gave a piece of ground with a shop,
which he directed to be pulled down and the materials
sold for the benefit of the poor. The building of the
Town-hall was commenced in 1701, and completed by
the summer of the ensuing year.'
The edifice thus erected by Mr. Guy consisted of a
room of considerable dimensions, supported by three
rows of large pillars of stone with semicircular arches,
each row containing six pillars. The ascent to the
room stood at the east end: and the space below was
destined as a place wherein to hold the weekly market.
In the centre of the roof, was placed a large wooden
glazed lantern, with a weather fane; leading out upon
a platform defended until lately by balustrades.
The existence of only a single room in the Town-hall,
1 Indenture s Jac. i. s Corpontion Recordi.
CASTLB AND TOWN. 485
was soon found inconvenient for the many purposes to
which the building might occasionally be granted^ as con-
certs^ or public exhibitions. In 1771^ two new rooms
were added at the east end^ at an expense of upwards of
270/. raised by subscription. These, however, on account
of their small dimensions, did not wholly serve to supply
the deficiency ; and, in 1811, it was determined to remove
them, and erect two more of a larger and more conve-
nient sixe. Towards this plan, the late sir Robert Peel
mimificently contributed 500/., to which the corporation
added 240/., on the completion of the alterations in
1812. The enlargement comprised not only the building
of the rooms, but also the addition of an underground
dungeon beneath them. John Robins, esq., at the
same time, added a clock in front, for the public benefit.
The space beneath the large room occupied for the
market was enclosed, in 1835.
In the present year, another alteration has been made.
The two rooms have been lengthened eastwards, the
last bay of the space appropriated to the market-people,
which had been built up, re-opened, and an entrance
formed upon the south side; so that there is not only
an increase of space for the accommodation of the mar-
ket, but an addition to the size of the rooms.
The Town-hall exhibits no particular pretensions to
architectural beauty. It is a substantial edifice, the old
part being built of brick, with stone dressings, the new,
entirely of brick. It is large and very convenient, being
the only building in the town suited to public purposes.
The dungeon is smaU, but dry and clean. Prisoners
committed for trial are usually removed to the jails
in the county-towns, with very little delay.
R 3
THE BRIDGES.
BOLEBRIDGB AND ANKER VIADUCT.
Leland, during the reign of Henry VIII., says "Of
the 2 Bridges that be at Tamworth, the Fayrer is Bowe-
bridge, though it stande on Anker, a lesse River then
Tame; and it is as it were towardes the North East
End of the Towne, in the waye to Polesworth and
Nuneaton. The other Bridge is called St. Mary Bridge,
havinge 12 great Arches, and leadeth to Coventrye. It
standeth on Tame, hard beneath the Confluence, and a
litle beneath the Castle, and as it should seeme by a
great stone upon the Bridge bearinge the Armes of
Basset to be built by the Lord Basset of Drayton."'
1 Itin. vol, IV., fol. 190 a.
castlb and town. , 487
Bridge of St. Mart.
The ''Bridge of our Lady" is named in 1294. On
the 11th of June in that year, a curious bye-law was
firamed that ''fectores de Tripes" should no longer wash
''leur Trypes" there, to the annoyance of the town,
under fine of 12d^ When this structure was first erected,
we have not been able to ascertain. At an early period,
it was endowed with lands and other property, for
maintaining and keeping it in repair. Shaw alleges a
bequest to it, in 1470, by Richard Archer, erroneously
referred by Collins to a church of St. Mary here, which
never existed.' It was placed under the care and
management of two wardens, elected annually at the
court leet and view of frank-pledge. The names of
several of these have been preserved, with the dates of
their respective appointments.' After the formation of
a select corporate body by queen Elizabeth, in 1560,
the baili& and commonalty took charge of that part
belonging to the town:* for the Bridge has ever been,
half in the jurisdiction of the borough, and half in
that of the county of Stafford.
Lady-bridge was originally a low and narrow struc-
ture, inferior, as Leland observes, to Bolebridge, which
it resembled in a great measure, being very narrow,
and provided with triangular recesses placed over the
piers of the arches, for the convenience of persons
walking over, during the passage of any large vehicle.
Its inconvenience, in the present expanded state of
commerce, would have rendered its removal necessary,
even if the waters had not destroyed it. On the 10th
1 Court rolls. s Shaw'B StalTordah. s See Appendix :~Note ag.
4 In 1004 Richard Weunan agreed to repair tliat portion of tlie Bridge within
the borongh, and to keep it in good order, for 40«. a-year. The agreement was to
laet for 50 years, If he lived so long, and two years at first paid in adranoe, to
defiray the immediate expenses of some requisite improrements.
488 . TAMWORTH
of February, 1796, several bridges on the Tame and
Trent sustained great damage from a tremendous flood,
caused by the sudden breaking up of the ioe after
a long and very severe frost. Amongst them, this
one at Tamworth received great injury, the second and
third arches from the town being fairly lifted up by
the ice, and then thrown down. The swaying of the
Bridge for some moments befi>re the fall, gave the
persons upon it timely notice of danger; but one vros
swept down, and carried along the stream for a con-
siderable distance; yet he was fortunately saved by
being thrown on a sheet of ice, from which he was
enabled to cross to the side. In the following year,
a higher and much larger bridge, consisting of six
arches, was erected jointly by the corporation and by
the county of Stafford, at an expense of about 2,000/.
The new Bridge, although far superior to the ancienti
one, possessed one great disadvantage. The central
third was made of a width amply sufficient, yet the ends
were so contracted that two ordinary vehicles could not
pass abreast. Several accidents at various times con-
sequently happened. An improvement in this respect had
long been greatly desired; but, on account of the
expense, nothing was effected until 1887. At that
time, an accident of a serious nature occurred. The
right hon. sir Robert Peel took up the matter, and
addressed a letter through the town-clerk to the coun-
cil of Tamworth, to this effect.
"Drayton Manor, Dec. 29, 1887."
"Sir,
I am desirous of making through you the following
communication to the Council of Tamworth.
I understand that there has been more than one
1 Shaw't Stiffordsh.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 489
practical proof of the inconvenience and danger arising
firom the contraction of the passage-way at each extremity
of Lady Bridge : and it appears to me that there is no
improvement which would conduce more to the comfort
of the inhabitants of Tamworth and to the general
advantage of the Town and Neighbourhood than the
rendering of so importa|it an approach to the Town
perfectly commodious and safe.
I write under the impression that one half of the
Bridge is under the charge of the Town Council^ and
the other under that of the County of Stafford; and
being desirous of contributing to a public work of so
much utility and convenience, I beg leave to make the
following proposal to the Town Council.
I will place the sum of 500/. at the disposal of the
Town Council, to be applied to the widening of that
part of the Bridge which adjoins the Town, upon these
conditions.
First That a sum shall be appropriated either from
funds at the disposal of the Council or to be raised by
public subscription, which, together with the sum above-
mentioned of 500/., shall be sufficient to complete that
part of the improvement of the Bridge in a handsome
and effectual manner.
And Secondly. That the County can be prevailed
upon to complete in a corresponding manner that part
of the improvement dependent upon them.
It is obvious that there would be little advantage in
a partial widening of the Bridge at one extremity ; and
the co-operation of the County is, therefore, requisite.
I trust, however, considering the accident which re-
cently occurred on that part of the Bridge, which, if
I am rightly informed, belongs to the County, the
490 TAMWOBTH
County will be dispoeed, on a proper representation
supported by facts^ to give their consent and assistance
towards an object of common concern and common
importance to the County of Stafford and Town of
Tamworth.**
''I have the honour to be^ Sir,
Tour obedient faithful Servant,
ROBERT PEEL.*'
In consequence of this letter and the munificent offer
which it contained, the town-council adopted active
measures for the purpose of effecting the intended im-
provement of widening the ends of the Bridge to an
equality with the central part. A presentment was,
after some difficidty, obtained by the grand jury at the
county quarter-sessions of the narrow and incommodious
state of the Bridge; notwithstanding, much oppo-
sition was raised to the alteration, on account of the
expense which the county would thereby incur. But,
through the influence and persevering exertions of one
of the magistrates, Henry J. Pye, esq., of Clifton-hall,
the requisite order was obtained at the sessions in April,
1839. The improvement of the Bridge was immediately
commenced, and was completed about the beginning of
the following year. During these repairs, records and
coins were formally deposited within the masonry, to
serve for the wonderment and edification of generations
yet slumbering in the embryo of time, that may live
when these ages shall be viewed as we now behold
those of ancient Greece and Rome.
The great stone alluded to by Leland, probably
formed at one time the pedestal either supporting an
image of our Lady with the Divine Infant, or a large
cross. In 1697, it was known as the cross and dial.
i
CASTLE AND TOWN. 491
«o it appears then to have been sunnounted by such
an indicator of the flight of time. It presented five
unequal sides, bearing escutcheons and other devices.
When Shaw saw this curious relic, the two largest
shields were quite defaced, but over one of them a
crown remained tolerably perfect. Either of them must
have borne the arms of Basset of Drayton, — Or, three
piles 6u., a canton Erm.^ In the compartment next
the last, was the monogram formed by the union of
the letters M and ft with a crown over, in allusion
to the blessed Virgin Mary. On the two remaining
sides, were inscribed the letters I Ip C, meaning
Jesus.' The stone survived the destruction of the old
Bridge. After the erection of the new one, it lay, for
many years, amongst some rubbish, at the end near the
Castle; subsequently it was placed in the groimd as a
support for the stump of some wooden railings: and
there, for anything that is known to the contrary, it
may remain at the present time, neglected by those who
scarcely seem to appreciate the feelings which they
would fain awaken in the minds of distant posterity.
BOLEBRIDOE.
Bolebridge lies at the south-east end of the town, and
not at the north-east as Leland inaccurately states. It
is very narrow and long, consisting of twelve small
arches, with triangular recesses over the piers. The
end towards Bolehall is much wider than the rest.
The structure appears to be as ancient as the old Lady-
bridge was. It was similarly placed under the charge
of two annually appointed wardens, of whom the
1 TIm other probably bore the anni of MennTon. Tbe Bridge would sean to
bare been erected by two peraons, pertly for the town and partly for the county,
Tlie atone was tnuttt&onaUy known as "the Marmyon stone.'*
s Shaw's Staflbrdsh.
492 TAMWORTH
names of those for one year only are preserved, Nicholas
Brown and William Oowth, elected to the office in
October, 1508, when they took the required oath.
From the exaction of tolls on vendible commodities, it
would appear that there was not an adequate provision
destined solely for its maintenance. It is now, as it
ever has been, partly under the care of the town, and
partly under that of the county of Warwick.
This Bridge, although once the finest of the two, is
now very inferior in every respect. Its narrowness
renders it ill-adapted for a thoroughfiu^ in these times,
but it has been made as commodious as its original
defective construction would allow. In the early part
of 1820, the bailifi had the side-waUs increased in
height, in consequence of an accident which then occur-
red. Its improvement, either by widening it, or by
building an entirely new one, has long been desired.
This plan is calculated materially to improve the lower
part of the town. But we fear that the scheme will
not be carried into execution for a considerable time,
unless, indeed, some unforeseen event should hasten the
tardy operations of those, to whom the repairs of the
Bridge are committed.
THE MOAT-HOUSE.
Amongst the private edifices within the town of
Tamworth^ there is only one, besides the Castle, which
demands especial notice. This is the Moat-house, a fine
Elizabethan building, situated on the south side of
lichfield-street, near the outskirts of the town. Here
several titled persons and &milies of distinction have
resided.
The Moat-house was built about the year 1572, by
Mr. William Comberford, of the very ancient and
honourable race seated at Comberford and at Wednes-
bury, in Stafibrdshire, and possessed of extensive property
in the adjacent parts of the country. At first, it seems
to have been inhabited by the family of Harcourt,
allied to that of the Comberfords by marriage, as
a map of Drayton, according to Shaw, indicated this
as their dwelling;^ but at the end of the sixteenth
century, William Comberford undoubtedly constituted it
bis residence, and continued in it until his death in
1625. Here he entertained prince Charles in 1619.
From the Comberfords, the Moat-house passed to
Thomas Fox, esq., who, settling here, on the 28th of
September, 1654, married, at this town. Miss Judith
Boothby.
1 Intfae rdgn of FhmpaiidMarr,WaltarH«n»iirthadhiidwdlingin Udi^
•tract, new the Hone-fair or '* Tunworth Oreen." In tho Oourt-iolli of the town,
from the Kign of Henry V. to Henry VIII., oonitut mention Is maide of the
MotttbalUend, at tiM lower ertremity of this street. Was tbe Moat-hoiise only
t In 157>?
s 3
494 TAMWOBTH
Thomas Fox did not hold the property for a very
long time. For^ by indenture of the 2nd of Aprils 1663^
he and his wife sold to sir William Boothby^ knt and
bart.y for 1,540/., the Moat-hall, with the edifices and
gardens belonging; the croft adjoining the court-yard;
the moat, with the right of fishing in it and in the
Tame ; — all these lay between the land of Thomas Fox
then enclosed with palings and in the occupation of
Thomas Grilbert, the garden belonging to Geo^
Wright's cottage, and the croft attached to the messuage
of John Ferrers, esq., occupied by William Fawkener,
on the east; Tamworth Green, on the west; and
lichfield-street, on the north; — the seat in the Church
belonging to the Moat-hall; the aisle or burying place
in the Chancel on the north side of the Church,
adjoining the Comberford-chapel ;* a messuage adjoining
the Moat-court; Street-orchard, with a little cottage,
situated between the land of Robert Comberford, that
of Thomas Fox called the Challengewood closes, the
common lane leading to the moor, and Lichfield-street;
a wood-ground called the Piddings in Hopwas, between
the common field, Hopwas-hays, and the Tame; the
tithes of com, grain, hay, wood, wool, and lamb, and
all others whatsoever arising out of the township-fields
and meadow of Hopwas, Hopwas-hays, and Broad-
meadow; and the liberty of keeping and marking six
swans upon the rivers Tame and Anker.
Sir William Boothby constituted the Moat-house his
residence.' In 1671, he sold it to sir Edward Littleton,
1 A part of the Church ia ittU marked out m belongfaiff to the Moet-honae, fbr
•epoltore. It Indadee nearly half of the Transept and a oontiderahte portioii in the
north- west comer of the Chantry-chapel.
t Extract trom the Parith-refister.
"Janaary, l(Ms[.4].
1 haptized WUUam the Son of Sr WUltaun Boothbey, Knight ft baitms and Dame
Hilla hlB wife, of Tamworth."
CASTLE AND TOWN. 495
bart.^ then of PUlaton-hall, in Staffordshire. The ktter
soon removed to Tamworth; and here numerous of his
family were bom or buried^ as is attested by the Parish
Blister.
April, 1676.
11 Baptized Devereux son of S' Edward Lytleton of
T., & Joyce Ux'.
July, 1677.
S4 Baptized Thomas son of S' Edward Lyttleton of
Tamworth, & Joyce Ux'.
September, 1678.
12 Baptized Fisher son of S' Edward Littleton of Tam-
worth, & Joyce ux'.
July, 1679.
14 Buryed Thomas son of S' Edward Lyttleton of
Tamw**"*.
March, 1679[.80].
9 Baptized William son of S' Edward Littleton of
Tamworth, and Joyce uxor.
August, 1681.
6 Baptized Jane daughter of S' Edward Littleton of
Tamworth, and Joyce ux'.
January, 1681[-2].
15 Buryed Jane daught' of S' Edward Littleton of
Tamworth.
December, 1682.
12 Baptized Joyce daught' of S' Edward Lyttleton of
Tamworth, & Joyce ux^
January, 168S[-4].
20 Baptized Charles son of S' Edward Littleton of
Tamworth, & Joyce ux^
March, 1683[-4].
15 Buryed Charles son of S' Edward Littleton of
Tamworth.
496
TAMWORTH
October, 1685.
26 Buryed Joyce daught' of S' Edward Lyttleton ot
Tamworth.
February, 1686[-T1.
24 Baptized Henry son of S' Edward Lyttleton of Tam-
worth, & Joyce ux'.
June, 1689.
7 Buryed Katherine daught' of S'. Edward Littleton
of Tamworth.
October, 1689.
HaMON DBWoLFI&8TON,inl283y
liad a charter of free- warren granted
him by Edw. I., in Wolfreston,
Preston, and Chelmnndeston, all in
SnffoU.
RooiR DB WoLPB&TON, in 1327,
held a fourth part of a knight's fee in
Wolferton.
Richard Wolvsston, clerk.
In 1363, the sum of 33/. was paid to
his executors for a Missal.
Roger db Wolfrston was
eicheator for the counties of Essex,
Suffolk, and NorfoU, in 1359-68.
Richard di Wolvbston, in
1380, held an " inquisitio ad quod
dampnum "— " pro priore de Dooen-
asshe," as to lands in Beigholte and
Culfo.
ROOBR DB WOLFBRSTON, "et
alii,'* in 1392, held a similar inqui-
sition "pro eocl'ie sancti Petri dc
Gippewic," — Ipswich, — as to lands
at the same places.
ELIZABBTHWoLVBRSTON,in 1420,
died seized of lands in Wolrerston,
Preston, Benholte, and Caketon.
Thomas wolfbrston, in 1433,
held one knight's fee in Freston and
Holbrooke of John de Mowbray,
duke of Norfolk.
Richard Wolvbrston, in 1497,
died seised of lands in Chulpho and
nine other manors.
Robbrt Wolfbrston, esq., of
Wolferston. in Suffolk, made his wiU
in 1492. HU son,
Thomas Wolfbrston, esq., of
Culfye, Suffolk, m. Maud or Mary,
dau. of sir Humphry Stanley, of
Pype, knight of the body to Henry
VII. His issue were,
I. PmLip, of Wolferston-ban, Suflblk,
who left an only dau^ter.
II. HvMPBBT, of whom preMntly.
III. Sampson, wbo m., Joljr, 1558, Jone
Laranoe, and hadsevend children.
IT, y, n, Tii. RoBBKT, Thomas, Si-
Mour, John.
Tm. Maboarbt, who m. Robert, atm
and heir of Richard BTerard, esq., of
Hether, oo. of Leicester.
IS. Ann, who m. Hxxgh Maisye.
Humphry Wolfbrston, esq.,
IN. Katherine, dan. of John Stanley,
esq., of Grove, oo. of Nottingham,
CASTLE AND TOWN.
497
15 Buryed Mr. James Lyttleton of Tamworth.
Aprffl, 1690.
S4 Baptized Adam son of S' Edward Lyttleton of
Tamworth^ and Joyce nx'.
August, 1690.
12 Buryed Mr. Edward Littleton of Tamworth.
January, 1691[-2].
eO Baptized Sarah, Daught' of S*" Edward Littleton of
Tamworth, & Joyce ux'.
by whom be acquired the manor of
Statfold, m Staffordshire. He d, m
1592, and had issae,
I. Hbrct, his snoeetior.
!■• III. Stanuy. Thomas.
IT. HAtTiNos, who m. Alice Molde.
T, Tl. HUMPBBT. JAHSS.
TU. Maud, who m. Tho. Aiblaster,
esq., of Longdon, co. of Stafford.
VUU IX. DOROTBT, ELlBABBTn.
z. Kathbbinb» who m. Ralph Thick-
nease, esq., of Balterly , co. of Stafford,
zi. Bbioxtta.
Hbbct Wolpsrston, esq., m*
18 Sept., 1593, Mary, dan. of Ralph
Egerton, esq., of Betley. He was
sometimes styled Captain, and is sup-
posed to have been present at the
tiddbog of Cadiz, in 1595. He d,
July 28th, 1636, and had,
I. Waltbb, who d, an infknt.
XI. FBANnssB, his successor,
lu. RiCHABD, who d. yonoff.
IV. Katbbbinb, who m. John Brome-
lleUl.
Francibbk Wolpebston, bapL
May 3rd, 1612, m. Sept. 29th, 1631,
Frances, eldest of 22 ofaildren of
George Middlemore, esq., of Hasle-
well, and had a numerous family.
Three sons and thxee daughters lived
to maturity.
1. Fbancm, his successor,
u. MiODiJBilORB, b, Axig. I8tb, 1648,
and d, uxun.
m. Stanfobd, a dergTman, of whom
immediately.
IT. Obacb. d. nnm. in 1710.
▼. Anw, m. in 1069, to Edward Arblas-
tcr, esq., of Lyswis, i^andson of Tho.
Arblaster before named,
n. SLisABBra, m. to John Bott, esq.,
of DonstaU, co. of Stafford, and had,
with three other daoffhters, Gbacb j
who m. the rev. Homphry Pipe, M Jk.,
and had an only son Samubl Pira,
in holy ordtrs, MA., of whom we
shall prescotly speak.
Francis Wolfkbstok, esq.,
purchased, in 1685, the manor of,
and considerable lands iu, Harlaston,
CO. of Stafford. He was a barrister
of good practice until tbe resolution,
but afterwards was a rig^d non-juror.
He was a particular friend of Dr.
Plot, the historian of Staffordshire,
and a writer himself, producing a-
mongst other pieces the translation
of Ovid, De arte amandi. In 1667,
he began to write his name Wolfer-
stan, — a practice which his family
has continued. He was twice m.,
but left issue an only daughter Ann,
heiress to her father's purchased es-
tates, by his first wife, Hester, dau. of
John Bowyer, esq., of Biddulph.
She m. June 14, 1703, sir John
Egerton, of Wrindiill, oo. of Staff.
Stanford Wolfbrston, the
second son, M.A., in holy orders,
vicar of Wooton-Wawen, and fellow
of King's Collage, Cambridge, m.
1st, in 1679, Isabella, dau. of John
Hinckley, D.D., rector of North-
field, eo. of Worcester, by whom, —
who d, in 1680, — ^he had only one
son Francis, who d. an infant ; and
2nd, Susanna, dau. of John Creed,
of Cambridge, by whom he left issue
at his deoeaae,^Sept. 29th, 1698,—
u Stavfobd, named presently.
II « XawAnn, ^ In idpi, and il. «. p. in
1701, and was bmr, at Tamworth.
ui. Fbancis, rector of DrByton.Baaact
and of Gxendon, who d. In 17S8 «. p,
IT. NICBOI.AS, who resided at Berry,
Deronahlre. He m, twice, but left
498
TAMWORTH
January, 1712-S.
15 Bur. Mr. Addam Littleton of Tamworth.
Sir Edward Littleton's decease occurred in 1709 :
and he was buried at Tamworth, on the Slst of July.
The Moat-house descended to his grandson Edward, who
made it his residence until 1751, when he died ; and he
was buried at Tamworth on the 5th of October.' He
had no issue, and his aunt Sarah, being heiress, con-
diligent and leuned antiqauy : and
IN., lit, Biaiswet, du. of Walter
Biddnlph, eaq., of BartoD-mider-
Naedwood ; and 2iid, Oct 4tfa, 1796*
Elisabeth, eUeit dan. of PhOip Jer-
▼is, eaq., tint oovain of John, eari
of St Vincent. He had iane only
by his tint wife.
I. Stamlst, named ImBedfateiy.
u. Maboabst, ■»., in 1817, to Chaites
Salt, esq-
StAMLBT PlFI-Woi.FBAaTAN,
esq., b, March 2l8t, 1785, snooeeded
to the estates on the decease of his
frther, in 1820, and is the present
proprietor of them. He m,, July
21st, 1817, Elisabeth, eldest dsn.
of Swinfen-Jerris, esq., of Kfnsii^*
ton, snd grand-dan. of Philip Jenria,
eao., of Nethenwale, co. of Leicester,
beiore named. Mr. Wolferrtan has
issue,
L FBANOsJlTAFVoan, I. October I4tk,
1885.
n. Geacs.
m. Aw maoMaeia.
IT. Maboabst-Jaits.
T. FBAirCBS-KUSABBVB.
▼1. Hbstbb-Sauw, who 4. in 1844.
▼n. 8TAirvoBi>>Wu.uAM.
▼111. JoHN-KoBBTOV, who d, SB fotuL
IZ. BoWAftD.
Z. XMU.T-DOBOTBBA.
zi. Hbbct.
Amxs .—-Quarterly Ist and 4th,
8a., B raas wavy between three
wohes' heads erased Or,-— for Wol-
ferstsn ; 2nd snd 3rd As., two oigan
pipes in chefrunt between ten croas-
GiossletB Or, — for Pipe.
CnnsTS:— A wolf Or, under a
tree ppr.,— for Wolforstan. A leo-
pard's head erased Or^ for Pipe.
a only hf Us Snt wifc, KlisBbeth,
dan. of Geo. FliiUtoa, caq., of Oocn-
wall,— Bdwabb, who liBd two wlTee,
but left iasoe only \ij the aeeond,—
MBIT, dan. of Peter NldKda, etq.,
great Branileoii of Peter Nicholii,
▼icar Of Bradwofthy, and Week St.
Panaaa, In the coanty of Deron, la
the year 1081. His temfly were,—
let, MiCBOUke, A. in 177^, and 4,
onm. la 17W i Hid, Mabt, ■». to the
rer. WilUam Ghautar, B.D.. peipctaal
curate of Hartland, who bad ueae i
Srd, XUBA BBrB,m. to tiie rer.Thomas
TlioaiBS, J.P. and Ticar of TMcnbam,
Glooeeeterelilre, wbobadiaeoe; 4tb,
FBAwcsei ftth, Sabab, wlio 4» onm.
in 1814) dth, HBeTBB, late of Umore
court, near Glonceitcr, and now reel-
dlDv at the Caatte of Tamwarth.
T. HvMVBBT, Bolicttor in Tamworth,
4. num. June Ttb, 1754.
STANVomD WoLnnsTAir, eeq.,
as heir in tail, succeeded his unde
Francis in the Statfold property.
He was a magistrate for the coe. of
Stafford and Warwick t and «. Sa-
rah, only dau. of sir Edward Little-
ton, bait., by whom he acquired the
Moat-houae in Tamworth, and the
other purchased eatates of his fkther.
He d. July 2nd, 1772 ; snd had
I. LiTTLBTON, 4, la I7O9, in bis lbther*e
life time «. p,
n. DoBOTBT, m. Sept igtb, 1740, the
rer. Samnel Pipe, yicar of Crazall,
CO. of Derby, and rector of Walton-
on-Treat Sbe 4. Oct. sUtb, 17M,
and bad iasoe, with othera, Samubi.
Five, to whom Mr. Stanliord WoUer.
deoeaaeofbiswiie.
in. IT. T. Tl. Sabab.
CB8. XUBABBTB.
JOTCB. FbAV-
1776, by sign manual, the surname
and arms of Wolferttan. He was a
1 Paiiah Eeiiiter.
CASTLB AND TOWK. 499
veyed the Moat-house to Stanford Wolferstan^ esq.^ of
of Statfold-hall> to whom she had been married on the
7th of July, 171S.»
In the year 1752, Stanford Wolferstan and his wife
disposed of the Moat-house to William Abney, esq. He
resided here \mtil 1767, when he sold it to George
viscount Townshend ; whose steward, John Willington,
esq., inhabited it for a considerable time.
The history of this mansion is involved in that of the
Castle from this period, until the time that property of
the Townshend family in and around Tamworth was dis-
posed of. The second marquis Townshend constituted
it his residence until his decease, in 1811. Afterwards
sir John Shee, bart., inhabited it for a brief space ; and
in the year 1815, Robert Woody, esq., went to reside
there.
In 1821, the Moat-house, paddock, and gardens, with
two houses and two bams in lichfield-street, inclu-
ding altogether 8a. 2r.; the Uberty of keeping and
marking six swans upon the rivers Tame and Anker;
the right of fishing in the moat, and other the ancient
privileges belonging to and enjoyed by the possessors of
the property ; and the burial place in the North Chancel
of the Church, were, with the Castle and other pro-
perty, conveyed to John Robins, esq.
Mr. Robins disposed of the Moat-house, in the same
year, with the rights and privileges attached, to Robert
Woody, esq., whose widow still inhabits it.
The Moat-house is a very large, handsome structure,
built of brick, standing upon the northern bank of
the river Tame. It is approached from lichfield-
street through a long avenue of noble lime-trees, of
500 TAXWOBTH
more than a century's growth^ and sonoonded by a
paddock upwards of six acres in extent^ and large gar-
dens.^ The northern front presents five gables, but they
have been greatly modemiaed. The side fiuang the riyer
retains more of the original state, many of the transom
windows being preserved. Two large rooms were added
on this side by Mr. Woody, who made many other
improvements, particularly in the road along the
avenue. The house is erected on large arches, for the
sake of dryness. The rooms within are very spacious
and comfortable: they have been mostly fitted up in a
recent style. On the second floor stood a large room,
used as a library, fifty feet long and eighteen feet
broad; but it is now separated into two. The ceiling
is divided into compartments of various sixes, which
contain the following arms.
1. Gu., on a cross engrailed Or, five roses of the
field semee of the second, — Comberford: impaling Vert,
semee of fleurs^^e-liz, a lion rampant Or, — ^Beaumont.
S. Comberford : impaling Or, a chevron Gu., between
three lions rampant Vert.
3. Six quarterings on a mantle semee of roses Gu.
Ist. Gu., a talbot passant Arg. , — ^the usual arms of
Comberford; 2nd, per pale indented Or and Vert,
in the dexter chief an escallop Gu.; 3rd, the first-
named coat of Comberford; 4th, Or, a bend wavy
between two cotizes Sa. ; 5th, Arg., on a bend compony
Gu. and Sa. cotized of the second, a mullet Or, — ^Leven-
thorpe; 6th, Sa., two lions passant Arg., crowned Or,
— ^Heronvile. Crest, a peacock's head ppr., gorged with
a ducal coronet Or.
1 WUUam Gomberfard cndoMd the pmmds with Mek wiDs, that between the
M oat-ganlen end TuBwoith.8Teeii,— the lait Itanned,— beinf erected la idM.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 601
4. Beaumont: impaling Or^ a lion rampant double
queued Vert, — Sutton, lord Dudley.
5. Comberford : impaling Arg., a chief vairy Or and
Gu., over all a bend Sa., — Fitz-Herbert of Staffordshire.
6. England; oyer the shield a ducal coronet.
7. Beaumont : impaling Leyenthorpe.
8. Comberford (the talbot) : impaling the first men-
tioned arms of the family.
9. Scotland; over the shield a coronet.
10. Leventhorpe : impaling Heronvile.
11. Comberford: impaling per pale indented Or and
Vert, in the dexter chief an escallop Gu.
12. Hidden by the wall between the rooms.
13. Heronvile.
14. Comberford (the talbot).
In the smaller room, are eight coats of arms.
1. Beaumont: impaling Gu., a lion rampant vairy,
— ^Everingham.
2. Beaumont: impaling Gu., a cross moline Arg.,
charged with an estoile of the first.
3. On a mantle semee of roses ppr., the first named
arms of Comberford: impaling Beaumont. Crest, a
peacock's head per pale Or and Gu., gorged with a
ducal coronet of the first.
4. Beaumont: impaling Arg., three garbs Or, — Co-
min, earl of fiuchan.
5. Beaumont: impaling quarterly Gu. and Or, in
in the first quarter a mullet of the first, — ^Vere.
6. On a mantle Ermine turned up flory Or, Beau-
mont. Crest, an elephant bearing a tower, trappings Or.
7. Comin: impaling Scotland.
8. Beaumont: impaling England, with a label of
three points Az., each charged with three fleurs-de-liz Or.
t3
t
502 TAHWOBTH
The moat^ with a wall^ surrounded the house^ passing
close beneath the edifice in fronts but enclosing a piece
of garden-ground on the south. The access was origi-
nally formed by a draw-bridge. Only part of the moat
now remains. In front it has been mostly filled up,
and lately converted into a garden, with a terrace.
Between the house and the river, it is still preserved,
and also the branch at the south-west comer communis
eating with the Tame.
To the Moat-house, are attached spacious and excellent
gardens. The pleasant and open situation of this
mansion, its antique appearance, and its internal conve-
nience, render it a fitting residence for a nobleman of
the highest rank.
ADDENDA ET CORRIGENDA.
Pages 49, 60. We have been favoured by William
Staunton, esq., of Longbridge-house, near Warwick,
with a note of five silver pennies issued from the royal
mint of Tamworth, which are in his collection, differing
from any we have mentioned.
Two of the reign of Edward the Confessor have these
inscriptions :~^
Obverse: — ^edwabd re.
Reverse: — goling on tam.
Obverse: — ^bdwaed re.
Eeverse: — ^brvning on tam.
Two of William the Conqueror : —
Obverse: — willelm rex.
Reverse: — brvnig on tamw.
Obverse: — ^willelm rex.
Reverse: — iblfwinb on tan.
One assigned to William Rufus: —
Obverse: — ^willelm rex ang.
Reverse: — ielfwine on tanv.
Page 64, line 9. For 1246, read 1238.
Page 67, lines 4 and 9. For 1261 and 1264, read
1260 and 1263.
Page 71, lines 11 and 25. Philip de Marmyon, by
royal command, restored the manor of Wigginton and
the Staffordshire part of Tamworth to John de Has-
tings, on the 25th of June, 1285.
504 TAMWORTH
Page 76; line SI. Ralph de Monthenner, on
marriage with Joan daughter of Edward I.^ was sum-
moned to Parliament as "Comiti Gloucestr' et Hertf."
But it does not appear that he retained the titles after
her decease.
Page 84; last line. For decease^ read departure.
Page 85, line 2. For 1272, read 1872.
Page 87, line 8. John Hastings also claimed to bear
the second sword at the coronation of Kich. II. The
earl of Arundel opposed him, but the right was
adjudged to Hastings; and the earl of March carried
the sword along with the spurs.
Page 91, line 11. For 1633-4, read 1533-4.
Page 117. The bailiffs thus replied to the earl of
Essex.
"May it pleas yo"" L*, we receaued yo' L'p*s Tre of
the 28th of December last, Wherein your L' doth corn-
end vnto. Ys your s'unt, Mr. Thomas Smith, to be a
fitt man for one of the Burgesses to be imploied for
our towne for the p'liam^; and we, on the behalf of
o' selves & the rest of o*" brethren, do, w*^ all thanke-
fulnes of yo' Pp's care had of our poore corporaoon,
referre all o' assents to yC Lo*p's no'i'acon of the choise
of two of three Burgesses no*i'ated and well liked of
amongest vs. first Mr. Broughton is and of long tyme
hath bene our recorder, who hath painefullie dealt in
all causes that hath concerned vs ; and in the p'liament
holden in the xxvij*** yeare of her Ma**» reigne, vpon
my L' of Leic'*" great favo' shewed vs, we well liked
of a Burgesse of his Comeudacon, and likewise willeng
to gratifie yo^ L'p's first comendacon, did allowe of Mr.
Bryttayne, by w'^*^ occasion Mr. Broughton relieng vpon
vs, being o' recorder, was disappointed, & for other
CASTLE AND TOWN, 605
placs he making no sute was quite out: for w^ wee
had good Cause to be sorye^ relyeng in all o' accons
ypon his firindlie and paynefull travaills. Moreou' &
it may pleas yo' Pp, S' Humfirey ferrers' Sonne, my 1*
kep's Sonne in lawe, hath heretofore bene burgesse of
the p'liam^ for o^ towne; and we haue foimde both his
fath' & him thankefull for o^ good liking of the then
choyseng of him, who doth now likewise make sute
vnto vs to be one of o' burgesses. Vnto whom we
haue given o' consents, if it may be w*^ yo' Lo' good
likinge : and for the nominacon & choise of the other
burgesse either to be Mr. Broughton or Mr. Smyth we
wholly referre to your Lo* discretion, and will remayne
to be certyfied of yo^ l*p*s choise against such tyme as
Choise shalbe made: and thus humblie we pray for
yo' L'p*s happie estate.
Yo' Lordshyp's poore frinds.*'
Page 121, line 19. For sixteenth, read seventeenth.
Page 135.
May 12°, "At the Comittee for safety of the
1644. County of Warr% & for sequestracon of
delinquents' estates within the county
aforesayd.
It is Ordered by the Comittee that Michael Baylyes,
now prisoner at Tamworth, shall be sent forthwith to
Coventry, to the Comittee: & the Tenants of Alcott
are not to be arested for any of the rents of Alcott
priory, without especyall Licence of the Comittee.
ex p' Abraham Boune,
clerke to the Comittee."
"Gentlemen,
We did Expect yo** would haue observed
o' direction given for the discharge of Michael Bayleis ;
506 TAHWORTH
we haue Conaideied sufficyently of the busynes, and
find the Money to be payable to 8>^ Hercules fiancis
Cook^ in Trust for the Lord ffinch^ and the Tytle was
also in him in trust. We Require that^ w^ut more
adoe^ the said Bayleis be discharged^ that he may haue
Libertie to Come & Acoompt here for the rents & debts
of the Lands: we find it a Matter w^ makes men's
estates lyable to Sequestation, to p'mote suites agaynst
men for obeyinge the Ordynances of Parliament, pray
trouble the Committee noe More Ti>on this occasion: we
suppose yo^ will not absolutely denie ys this soe fitting
a Comaund^ whoe are^
Coventry, 18® Yo* very Loveinge flUends,
Maij, 1644. R. SKEFFINGTON.
FFR. HALES,
"ffor their ffnends, the WILLM COLMORR
Bayleife of Tamworth, PETER BURGOYNE.
these." THO. WHiLUGHBY."
"Honored GentP,
As we are not vnwilling to sett att lib'tie
Michaell Bailyes vppon j(f Command, Soe we hope
yo^ are as vnwillinge to haue vs sett att lib'tie a
prisoner for a debt vppon specialtie, not giving vs any
warrantie for (f discharge & indempnitie therein ; which
we shall expecte from yo* before we shall dare to dis-
charge the p'tie. But if we may receive your warrantie
for 0' discharge, we shall most readily obey. And this
Zele we hope will giue yo^ a full satisfaccon, w%ut
any more trouble. And soe reste
SO Maij, 1644. Yo' most readie to serue yo^
THOMAS KNIGHT, >
THOMAS KEYE, \ ^*y*^-
CASTLE AND TOWN. 607
Page 148. This address was presented to Queen
Ann, in 1710, in behalf of Tamworth, after the im-
peachment of Henry Sacheverell, D.D., in the House
of Lords for high crimes and misdemeanors, on account
of two sermons he had preached, one at the assizes of
Derby, on the 15th of August^ the second before the
lord mayor at St. PauPs, on the 5th of November,
1709 ; which, being printed, had been denounced in the
lower house as ''malicious, scandalous, and seditious
libels, highly reflecting upon her majesty and govern-
ment, the late happy revolution and the Protestant
succession as by law established, and both hoases of
parliament, tending to alienate the affection of her
majesty's good subjects, and to create jealousies and
divisions among them."
St. James's, May 18th, 1710.
This Day, the following Address from the Borough of
Tamtoofih was presented to Her Majesty, by Mr. Ser-
jeant CHrdler, their Recorder, one of their Representatives
in Parliament, attended by Sir TJiomas Lawley, Bart.,
Joseph Girdler, Esq., and several other Grentlemen of the
Corporation, introduced by his Grace the Duke of Shrews-
bunfy Lord Chamberlain of Her Majesty's Household, in
the Absence of the Right Honorable the Lord Viscount
Weymauihy their High Steward.
''To the Queen's most Excellent Majesty.
The humble Address of the High-Steward, Bai-
liff, Recorder, Town Clerk, Capital Burgesses,
Gentlemen, Clergy, and other Inhabitants of the
ancient Borough of Tamiworthy in the Countieis
of Warwick and l^fford*^
508 TAMWORTH
"May it please Your Majesty ,
We^ Your Majesty's most dutiful and loyal Subjects,
make bold, in all humble manner, to Approach Your
Presence with our firee-will offering; and being warm'd
with a noble Zeal and Ardour for the safety of Your
Majesty's most Sacred Person and Grovemment, and an
Affection for our holy Mother-Church, do Unanimously^
and from the bottom of our Hearts, assure Your
Majesty, That, being deeply sensible of the Obligation
of our Allegiance to Your Majesty as God's Vicegerent,
we will stand by and support Your Majesty, at the
Expence of our Lives and Fortunes, in Defence of Your
Most Sacred Person^ Rights, and Prerogatives, the
Protestant Succession, and the Church of England as
by Law Establish'd, against all Oppoeers, both at home
and abroad, against Papery and Fanaticism, whether in
Religion or Politicks; and against all such Persons,
(if 'tis possible such Monsters there should be^) who
make use of the Terms of LoyaUy and Moderation only
as a Mask to cover Designs which they dare not pub-
lickly own, and which, if ever they attempt, we hope
the Experiment will prove dangerous only to the
Authors.
And as the best Discharge of that Duty we owe to
our Country and Your Majesty, we wiU, on all Occa-
sions, choose such Representatives in Parliament, as
shall be most likely to Unite in Heart, and Voice, and
joint-Endeavours, to promote every thing that may tend
most effectually to the Preservation of God's holy
Church and Religion among us, the Safety and Honour
of Your Majesty's Person and Government, and the
Discouragement of Vice and Prophaneness.
That, therefore, our Church, which is built high upon
CASTLE AND TOWN. 509
a rock may never become low or abased; That Your
Majesty, the Supreme Head and Ornament thereof, may,
for their Comfort and Protection, govern long a willing
and obedient People; That the length of Your Reign
may be proportioned to the Glories of it, and as
remarkable for the happy Fruits of Peace as it has
been for those of War ; And the Piety of Your Exam-
ple as universally imitated as it is commended ; are the
daily Prayers of Your Most obedient Subjects, who
have hereunto subscribed their Names, and Affix'd the
Common Seal of this Your Loyal Corporation.*'
The queen received the address very graciously; and
Mr. Serjeant CHrdler and the rest of the Gentlemen had
the Honor to kiss Her Majesty's Hand.
Page 175, line 5. For form, read forms.
Page 181, line 13. For assignees, read assigns.
Page 192, line 21. We have discovered Cocket's lane
to have been College-lane, in which the National School
stands.
There was once a holy well in the Warwickshire
part of Tamworth; for, in 1276, it is said "Will's
Chelle obstruxit viam q' ducit ad fontem S'ci Ruffiany."
This is most probably St. Ruffin, who, with his brother,
St Wulfhad, in 670, embraced Christianity. They
were baptieed by St. Chad, bishop of Lichfield, and
were slain, whilst at their prayers, by order of their
father Wulfere, king of Mercia, on account of their
having abandoned idolatry.
Page 19S, line 6. For a very small, read no.
Page 197, line 2. For they do not contain, read it
does not contain.
Page 198, line 11. For 35, read 32.
Page 216. At his decease, in 1291, Philip de Mar-
V 3
510 TAMWORTH
myon had the Church of Tamworth in his donation.
John de Teford held the deanery, valued, in common
years, at 10/. ; Robert de Pygford had a prebend valued
at 7/. a-year; Ralph de Heneman, one valued at 61.;
Hugh de Cave, one valued at 5/.; Michael de Ormeby,
one valued at 41 ; and Adam de Waltone, one of the
same value.
Page 221, line 2. Amongst our late researches, it
was our fortune to meet with letters patent of Henry
YI., concerning the foundation of two chantries in the
Church here, and the provision of sacramental wine.
The document is dated the 9th of February, 1445-6.
Henry YI. begins the charter by declaring that
although his attention was usually centred on the
welfare of the whole English church, — ^not on particular
foundations, — ^yet it became him specially to direct eyes
of compassion towards the collegiate Church of Tam-
worth, and, extend his protection to it. It appears firom
the statement of John Bate, the dean, that divine wor-
ship here had considerably declined, particularly when
the vicars choral, deputed to the cure of souls, and
attached to the prebendal chapels, were necessarily
occupied in the ministration of the sacraments out of
the Church, at least at the principal festivals of the
year. Thus, on account of their fewness from their im-
avoidable absence, the canonical hours had been omitted,
and the solemnities of mass laid aside, not only to the
scandal of this Church, but to the detriment of Christ's
faithful in it. This had caused the king on hearing it
much sonow; and to remedy the evil in some manner,
he made these concessions. He founded a perpetual
Chantry of one chaplain, who, every day, should celebrate
mass for the peace and happy tranquillity of his king-
CASTLE AND TOWN. 511
doms of England and France^ for his health and that
of his dear consort Margaret during their liyes, and for
their souls when they were dead, for the souls of his
august £stther and mother^ of all his progenitors, and of
all the faithful departed, at the altar of the Holy and
Undivided Trinity in the Church, for ever. The chap-
lain should serve in the canonical hours, high masses,
and other divine offices to be celebrated daily by
direction of the dean, that, by aid of this foundation,
the divine worship so depressed might recover and
flourish, and ever endure to the praise of God, by His
abounding grace. The king assigned to the chaplain
of the Chantry, for his maintenance, the fee-farm rent
of 116^., which the men and tenants of the Warwick-
shire part of Tamworth were accustomed to render to
the crown annually through the sheriff of the county,
to be paid yearly by the bailifb of that side of the town
on the feasts of St. Michael the Archangel, the Nativity
of our Lord, Easter, and the Nativity of St. John the
Baptist, or otherwise according to the chaplain's will,
at the four usual terms, by equal portions; notwith-
standing any statute or ordinance to the contrary. The
king commanded that it should be named his Royal
Chantry. He gave licence to the chaplain to receive
lands and other possessions from any person to the
value of 100«., and to sell and alienate them without
any inquisition by pretext of royal writ, and without the
payment of any fee or fine to the king, the mortmain
act not even interposing. He, moreover, gave to the
dean the power of conferring the Chantry on any fit
chaplain able to chant in the canonical hours, high
masses, and the other divine offices ; who should first
make oath of personal residence here and of the obser-
51S TAM WORTH
vance of the lawB and regulations of the dean. When
by cessation there should be a vacancy, the dean and
his successors should, in the same manner, firom time
to time, admit another chaplain; and any of them
might be removed for negligence as to residence or the
keeping of the regulations, or for any notable crime
which would induce deprival according to the traditions
of the holy fathers and the sacred canons. Moreover,
as the dean, in his care and vigilance towards the
Church, for the decorum of worship and the keeping
of the charge committed to him, was desirous of found-
ing another perpetual Chantry at the altar of the blessed
and glorious Virgin Mary here, to the praise of God,
abo of the glorious Mother, and in honour and memory
of the holy virgins Editha and Katherine, and to the
augmentation of divine worship, the king granted licence
to him to establish such a Chantry of one chaplain;
who should celebrate mass daily at this altar for the
peace and happy tranquillity of England and France,
for the health of the king and that of his consort, also
of the dean, in life, for their souls afterwards, and fiir
those of Robert and Alice Bate father and mother of
the dean, of their parents and bene&ctors, and of all
the faithful departed for ever. The chaplain should
assist in the canonical hours, high masses, and other
divine offices. The king ordered that it should be called
the Chantry of dean Bate, and granted licence to the
dean, his heirs, assigns, or executors, to bestow on it
any possessions, spiritual or temporal, to the value of
twelve marks a-year, whether held of the crown or of
others by military service or otherwise, for the chaplain
at the altar, towards his maintenance, without any
inquisition or fine or fee to the king, notwithstanding
CASTLE aud town. 513
the mortmain act or any other ordinance whatsoever to
the contrary. And in order that the venerable and
most excellent sacrament of the Body and Blood of our
Lord Jesus Christ might be approached in the Church
more frequently and diligently by the devout fidthful of
Christy with pious delight^ prone wills, and sincere
minds, the king granted to the vicars choral and chap-
lains of the Chantries, every year, a hogshead of red
wine, from the royal wines in the port of Bristol, to be
delivered by the head butler, for the most sacred use
of the celestial mysteries, according to the direction of
the dean.
Page 222, note and engraving. In reference to the
seal of the Church, we have received a communication
from William Staunton, esq., of Longbridge-house, near
Warwick, stating that he had in his possession the
matrix of the seal of Tamworth-Church, and offering,
in a very kind and liberal manner, to give us an im-
pression to engrave for this history. Of the opportunity
we did not fail to avail ourselves.
The seal is totally different frt>m the one to which
we alluded in the note, as attached to the grant for
mass of requiem by sir Thomas Ferrers. It is much
superior in size, richness of the design, and execution.
Of the three large central figures, one is doubtless that
of St. Katherine, as she bears the wheel and sword,-->
the instruments of her martyrdom. Of the other two
figures, one, with the archiepiscopal crosier, is probably
St. Thomas of Canterbury; the other, a bishop with
the pastoral staff, cannot be determined, as there are no
distinctive marks placed about him. In the upper
compartment, is the Virgin with the Divine Infant;
in the lower one, a bishop in prayer. On one side of
514 TAM WORTH
the latter^ is an escutcheon, with the initials T P;
on the other side, one bearing the arms,— on a fess
between three pheons, two and one, points downwards,
a buck's head cabossed, between two pellets. The in-
scription is, S COMVNE COLLEGIATE DE TO'-
WORTH. From the style of the tabernacle work, we
judge the seal to have been executed in the fifteenth
century. The matrix is steel, originally gilt.
There is a very curious circumstance observable in
reference to this seal. It is very plain that it did
not originally belong to Tamworth Church, but was
altered to suit it. The depth to which the inscription
and the shields have been cut, show that the original
legend and arms were obliterated to make room for the
substitution of others : and the representation of a bishop
praying in the lower compartment, farther indicates
this fact. On the shield with the initials, may be
plainly traced the three fleurs-de-Uz of the arms of
France and England quarterly, which have been only
imperfectly erased. The later inscription betrays the
unskilful hand of the second artist ; who was compelled
to omit the word ecclesib in connection with colleoi-
ATE, and to contract and greatly cramp the name of
Tamworth. The adoption of Roman characters shows
the late period at which the changes were made. The
present arms are those of Parker; and the initials
T P make it evident that the second owner of the
seal was Thomas Parker, who was the dean of this
Church at the time of the ecclesiastical survey in 1535.
We have been unable to discover to whom this seal
originally belonged. The adoption of a second-hand
seal speaks very indifferently with regard to the finan-
cial state of this Church: a similar practice is scarcely
CASTLE AND TOWN. 515
known except in connection with the most poorly-endowed
institutions. John Gough Nichob, esq., of London,
through whom we first received Mr. Staunton's commu-
nication, mentioned as the only instances he knew of
a similar practice, the corporate seal of Maidenhead,
originally the priyate seal of a priest, and that of an
Almshouse at Croyden, which had been made for Stoke,
in Suffolk.
Page 224, line 3. For 6«., read 7*.
Page 225, Une 15. For 168. read lis.
Page 262, line 14. Dele and on a higher level.
Page 265, line 7. Dele three chevronells.
Page 275, line 5. For rib appears, read ribs appear.
Page 282. line 6. In attributing the subject of the
painting to the Day of Judgment, we are guided by the
opinion of an architect, and of some in whose ac-
quirements we reposed much confidence. However, on
showing him a drawing of the painting, an eminent
Roman Catholic clergyman, distinguished by his profound
knowledge of ecclesiastical antiquity, pronounced the piece
to represent the legend of St. Nicholas. Subsequently
he referred us to a book bearing upon the subject, —
"Db Historia SS. Ihaginuh bt Picturarum, pro
vero bartjm tj8u contra abusus, libri quatuor ;
ATTCTORB JOANNB MOLANO. JOANNBS NaTALIS PaQUOT Rb-
CENSUIT, ILLTJSTRAVIT, SUPPLBVIT. LOVANII, M.DCC.LXXI."
In Lib. hi, cap. ijii, p. 387« our author treats,
**De picturia sancti Nicolai.** — "Qui pingitur cum tri-
Bus PuERis, sed tam obscure, ut vix sciam, quonam
referenda sit ea pictura. Tres Juvenes milites naufragium
passes a sententia Judicis liberavit, qui eos ob furtum
injuste ad necem damnaverat ; tunc enim temporis Leges
furtum non puniebant nece. Tres Filias prostituendas
516 TAMWORTH
sua clancularia mimificentia in pudidtia conserravit.
Tres militiffi Principes, apud Constantiniim falso accu-
satos eripuit a pemicioso jugolatu. Fertor etiam a
plebeiis, mulierem quamdam vesperi ties pueios occidisse,
& in vase pro salitis camibus reposmsse : eosque demum
a Nicolao resuscitates esse. En quatuor temaiia. Sed
ad quod eorum Pictores respexerint, nondum exprimere
valeo.'*
A note is here added which immediately illustrates
our subject. ''Hand dubium^ quin plerique ad quartum
temarium respexerint. Erat is, ut est adhuc, in ore
vulgi : solebatque festivis dramatibus exhiberi ; quorum
unum. Lector, accipe descriptum e codice XIII. seculi,
ad Floriacense S. Benedicti Coenobium pertinente. De-
beo illud Auctori libri, hoc titulo editi: Varietes
hUtariqueSy Physiques, 8f Litieraires, 8fc. Paris, 1752.
Ibmo III. Parte I. pp. 184-188.
P&mus Clbricus.
Not, quo8 causa diioendi littenw
Apnd gentet transmiiit ezteraa,
Dam sol adhue extendit radiom,
Perqniramtts nobit hoipitinm.
Sbcttndus Clbkicub.
Jam sol eqnos tenet in litore,
Quos ad pisoes merget nib vqaore :
Nee est nota nobis hsc patria ;
Ergo quBii debent hospitia.
Tbktius Clbkxcus.
Senem qaemdam, matomm moribns,
Hie habemus coram Inminibns :
Forssn, nostris compnlsns precibus,
Erit hospes nobis hospitlbns.
SiMUL OMNBS AD SbnBM SICUNT.
Hospes carei qnsrendo Stadia,
Hoc relicta Tenimos patria ;
Nobis ergo pnestes hospitiami
Jhun durabit boo noeds spatiam.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 517
Sbnex.
Hospitetur toi Factor omnium ;
Nam non dabo Yobis hospitium ;
Nam nee mea in hoc atilitas,
Nee est ad hoc nee* opportonitas.
CUIRICI AD VSTULAll.
Per te, Cara, sit impetrabile,
Qnod rogamus, etsi non utile :
Forsan propter hoc beneficium,
Vobis Deu8 donabit puerum.
MULIBR AD SbNEM.
Noshis dare, Conjox, hospitium,
Qui sic Yagant qusrendo Studium,
Sola saltem compellat caritas :
Nee eat damnum, nee est utilitas.
Senbx.
Acquiescam tuo consilio,
Et dignabor istos hospitio.
Senex ad Cle&icos.
Aooedatis, Scholares, igitur ;
Qnod rogastis, vobis conceditur.
Senex ad uzorem, Clericis dormientibus.
Nonne Tides quanta marsupia ?
Est in illis argenti copia ;
Hsec a nobis, absque infamia,
Possideri posset pecunia.
Vetula.
Paupertatis onus sustulimus.
Mi marite, quamdiu yiximus :
Hos si morte donare Yolumus,
Paupertatem vitare possumus. . . .
Eyagines ergo jam gladium ;
Namque potes, morte jacentium.
Esse dives quamdiu vizeris :
Atque sciet nemo quod feceris.
NiCHOLAUS.
Peregrinus fessus itinere,
Ultra modo non possum tendere •.
Hiqus ergo per noctis spatium,
Mihi pnestes, precor, hospitlam.
* Forte: Nunc.
w 8
H
518 TAMWORTH
Sbksx ao MuLisasM.
An dignabor istum hotpitio,
Cara coi^nx, tao otmiiUo ?
Vbtula.
Hnnc penona oommendat niminm :
Et est dignua ut des hoflpitiiEin.
SSNBX.
Peregrine, accede propitiiii ;
Tir widens nimia egregini ;
Si TiSi dabo tibi comedere :
Quidquid Tolea, tentabo qiuerere.
NiCBOLAUSy AO MBirSAM.
Nihil ex his possum comedere :
Camem yellem recentem edere.
SSMBX.
Dabo tibi camem quam habeo ;
Namque came recente careo.
NiCHOLAUS*
None dixisti plane mendacinm ;
Carnem habes recentem nimiom :
Et hanc habes, magna neqnitia,
Qnam mactari fedt pecunia.
SbKBZ & MVLXXX.
Miserere nostri, te petimns ;
Nam te sanctnm Dei cognosdmas :
Nostrum scelns, abominabile,
Non est tamen incondonabile.
NiCHOLAUS.
Mortoorom afferte corpora,
Et contrita sint vestra pectora :
Hi resurgent per Dei gratiam :
Et Tos flendo quaeratis Teniam.
Orationxs Nioholax.
Pie Deus, cujos sunt omnia,
Caelum, tellus, aer, & maria
Ut resurgent isti, prscipias :
Et hos, ad te clamentes, audias.
Et post OKiriB Cboxus x>icat
Te Deum laudamui.
CASTLE AND TOWN. 519
In this play or mystery, a great deal was represented
in dumb show, as the murder of the clerks, the con-
cealment of their bodies in a tub, their resuscitation,
&c., which the imagination of our readers must supply.
The clerks in the piece at the Church are certainly
made to rise from a place more like a tub than a tomb.
The three figures of females, our kind informant consi-
dered to be those of ladies who had caused the painting
to be executed, and who are made to kneel imploring
the patronage of the saint, whose figure was represented,
and whose altar stood close by.
Page 296, line 30. For heads, read head.
Page 299, line 25. For enlarged, read inlaid.
Page 322, line 8. The Unitarian Chapel was built
in 1724.
Page 360, line 4. Baldwin Frevile was involved
in the rebellion against Richard II. By letters patent,
dated the 9th of February, 1497-8, at Clifton-Campvile,
the king granted him a firee pardon for all treasons and
felonies committed by him previous to the 31st of
January last past, — ^murders and rapes excepted,^ — ^unless
he were convicted as a common thief, or were an accom-
plice in the murder of any man. He was also forgiven
the escape of felons, the chattels of felons and fiigatives,
fines, forfeitures, and transgressions, which would have
subjected him to pecuniary penalties and imprisonment ;
also the disposal, alienation, and acquirement of lands
and other possessions held in capite, without royal
licence, and entrance into, or acquirement of, his or
others' inheritance after the death of his father, without
due process, yet except such as were alienated contrary
to the mortmain act. Any sentence of outlawry promul-
gated against him was revoked
1 Thste and the oUier exoeptloiii were tnaerted m a mattar of fonn.
520
TAMWORTH
May not his treason have caused his rejection as the
Champion of the dignity of the crown, at the coronation
of Henry IV?
Page 877, line 28. For prebend, read president
Page 878, line 22. For Apr., read Sept. Lady Ara-
bella Ferrers Townshend was another daughter of the
second marquis Townshend. She died unmarried.
Page 888, line 28. For 2s., read 9$.
APPENDIX.
Note 1, page 71.
"Coram Rege, £' primo, anno v indpien' y).
Querela inter ho'i'es reg' de d'nico Reg' de Tamworth &
Wiggintpn, & Fh'm de Marmyon, que eadem man'ia tenuit ex
reuernone Reg', tangen' e'vicia & aU' cons', que ab eis exigit,
non terminal'." — Corporation Rbcords.
Note 2,
page 102.
NAMES OF HIGH BATTTFFS.
A.D.
STA770RD8HIRX.
WARWICK8HIRB.
1284
Will. Wareman.
1294
Simon le Sauvage,
Will. Wareman.
Hen. de Billey.
John de Pichford. (July 4.)
1309
John le Saavage,
Ralph le Dester.
Will. Ned.
Rob. Jewet.
1310
Will. Matthew.
John de Shepev.
Ralph Drambel.
John de Pichford.
1312
John Hendeman.
John de Wycford. (July 2.
1313
John le Sauvage,
John Hendeman.
John le Cocks.
John de Wycford.
1314
Will, le Chanoon.
John Hendeman.
John de Wycford.
1315
Will, le Chanouo,
John de Pichford,
John le Sauvage.
John de Shepey.
1317
WiU. le Chanoun,
John le Sauvage.
John de Pichford.
1321
Rob. Jewet,
Will. Batcock.
1329
Will, le Querdon,
Tho. de Harlaston.
1332
John de Wridefen,
John de Pichford,
Ralph Jewet.
Will, le Hayward.
1338
Will. Batcock,
Philip GosB.
1352
Rich, le Wheeler,
John le Hay ward.
ii. TAMWORTH CA9TLB AND TOWN.
A.D. nArfOftOSHIRB. WAEWICKSHIRB.
1355 Rob.leWlieeler.
Ralph le Prior.
1357 Hidu le Wbeder,
Rob. de Coton,
John le Newman.
1358 John le Hayward, Tho. Keek.
Rob. le Wheeler. Rog. de Pipe.
1359 John le Hayward,
Rob. le Wheder.
1360 Rob. de Cotan.
John le Sadler.
1366 Ridi. le Wheeler.
John Newman.
1368 Rog.le Homer, Rog. Bates*
Jobi Matthew. Adam Breton.
1370 John le Sadler, Rog^. Bates.
John Newman. Will. Keek.
1372 John de Loaghboroogh.
John Matthew.
1373 Ridi. Wheeler. (July 5.)
John Newman.
1375 John de Longhboroogh,
John Matthew.
1377 Rob. de Aaton. Adam Breton.
Rog. Homer. WiD. Keek.
1378 John Sadler.
John Loughborough.
1379 Ralph Sihreeter.
John de Barton.
1381 Ralph Siheater, Adam Breton.
Jolm de Barton. John Taylor.
1384 John Sadler.
Tho. Sawyer.
1387 John de BblknhalL
John de Elfbrd.
1 390 John de BoDenhiill.
Tho. le Walker.
1391 John de Ellbrd.
John Sadler.
1392 Tho. Walker.
John Bate.
1395 John de BoUodhnll.
John Homer.
1397 John Coton.
John Horner.
APPENDIX.
lU
A.D.
BTArFORDBHIRB.
WARWICK!
1402
Rog. Melewich,
Tho. Tkylor.
1403
John Coton,
Tho. Symond.
1408
Will. Cook,
John Bate.
1409
Tho. Symond,
Rich. Dalton.
1411
Tho. Lamb,
Tho. Taylor,
John Coton.
John Helewys.
1414
Hen. Jekes,
Will. Cook.
1417
Win. Cook,
John Rnssel.
1418
Tho. Colman,
Tho. Symond.
John Stokes.
1419
Hugh Freeman,
Hen. Barker.
1421
John RuBsel,
John Rote.
1424
Tho. Taylor,
Hen. Barker.
1427
Hen. Jekes,
Will. Cook.
1428
Will. Marshall,
John Russel.
1430
Tho. Colman,
John Rote.
1435
John Russel,
John Coton.
1436
Ralph Daniel,
Tho. Colman.
1438
Peter Goabout,
Tho. Colman.
1439
Hogh Colman,
John de Coton.
1440
John Russel,
Tho. ChaUoner.
1442
Peter Goabout.
1444
Peter Goabont,
Tho. Challoner.
1445
Rich. Dalton,
1448
Rob. Stokes,
Rich. Dalton.
IV.
TAMWOKTH CASTLB AND TOWN.
A.O.
8TAPF0E1MHI11X.
1450
Rich. Dalton.
1451
John Ruaael,
John Coton.
1454
Rich. Dalton.
John Colman.
1455
John Geffrey,
John Goldaon.
1456
John Coton,
Peter Goahout.
1459
John Geffrey f
Tho. Matthew.
1460
John Hodn^t,
John Seaman.
1461
John Geffrey,
Rich. NichoUfi.
1462
John Breton,
Nich. Rttgeley.
1469
Rich. Dalton,
Peter Goabout.
1470
Hen. Jekes,
Rich. Nicholls.
1493
John Chare,
WUl. Green.
1500
John Irp,
Nich. Bishop.
1505
John Repington,
John Hill.
1507
John Jekea,
John Irp.
1509
Tho. Goldson,
John Hill.
1516
John Jekes,
Will. Harrison,
John Mason.
Tho. Woodshaw.
1530
Hen. Scale,
John Repington.
1547
Rich. Jekes,
Humph. Towers,
Hen. White.
John Hewer.
Note 3,
page 103.
NAMES OF LOW BAILIFFS.
1332
WUl. le Cook.
1334
John le Cokes.
APPENDIX.
A.O. 8TAPPORD8HIRX.
1387 John Bate.
1388 Hen. de Catton.
1392 Nich. Rusael.
1395 John Sulby.
1410
1411 Adam Brege.
1430 John Walker.
1451 John Walker.
1505 Rich. Shemford. (July 21.)
WARWICK8BIRB.
John Baynton.
John Melton.
Note 4, page 103.
NAMES OF TASTERS OB VICTUAL CONNERS.
From the Ctntrt RoiU,
1303
1304
1312
1338
1339
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1365
1366
1371
1374
Alan Symond,
Ralph Silvester.
John le Sadler,
Ralph Silvester.
John le Carter,
Ralph Silvester.
Rog. le Homer,
Ralph Silvester.
Rog. le Homer,
Ralph Silvester.
Hen. Matthew,
Ralph Bear. (July
Hen. Matthew.
Rob. de Newark.
John de Staunton.
Ralph Silvester,
Hen. Matthew.
Tho. Walker,
Rog. Taylor.
John Hendeman,
Rich, de Ireland.
Rich, le Palmer,
Hen. Clement. (Nov. 10.)
Ralph Drambel,
John Hendeman.
John le Haywardf
Rich. Page. (Oct. 11.)
John le Homer,
Adam le Mulward.
Hen. Symond,
John Jewet, jun.
Will, de Querdon.
1.)
(July 14.)
▼1. TAMWOKTH CABTLS AMD TOWK.
A.O. CTAWOEDSBimS. WAEWlCKSBimS.
1375 Rob. BuoDodk,
Hen. BoDenhiilL
1377 WiD. Baker.
John Bete. (Oct 31.)
1379 Hen.Ggttoii»
John Miffftt
1387 JohnSsvage.
Tho. Symond. (July 15.)
1388 Nich. Rnaadl,
John de Hopwaa. (July 37.)
1388 JohnBevage,
John JeweL (Not. 9.)
1889 Hen. Matthew.
Nidu Draper.
1397 Tlio. Lamb,
Rbb.Newerk.
1401-3 Tlio. Lamb,
Rog. Gaidmaker.
1403 Tlio. Lamb,
Rog. Cardmakcr*
1408 Tho. Lamb,
John Kingahnral.
1409 WiD.Gaover,
WDl. Hatoogbton.
1409 Wm. Gtorer,
Rog. Cardmaker.
1410 Tho. Lamb,
John Kingahont.
1411 wm. HaloQgfateo, John Rnndl.
Win. Glover. Tbo. Gbalkner.
1414 WiD. HakMgbton,
wm. Glofer.
1417 wm. HakmghtOD,
John Ratter.
1418 wm. Gtorer,
John Walker.
1419 Wm.Glow. Ridi.Wyan,
John Rntter. ^^lch. Roo.
1420 wm. Qover.
wm. Jordan.
1420 wm. QoTer,
Hen. Ta]ior.
1421 wm. Gbver,
John Denby.
AFFBNDIX. YU.
A.D. STAFTORDSHIRB. WARWICK8HIRB.
1422 Will. HaloughtOD,
John Denbv.
1423 WiU. Haloughton,
John Denby.
1424 Will. Glover.
Hen. Cooper.
1426 Will. Glover,
John Denby.
1427 Will. Glover,
John Denby.
1428 Hen. Cooper,
John Denby,
1431 Will. Haloaghton,
John Denby.
1432 Will. Haloaghton,
John Halton.
1436 John Fox,
Nich. Borbache.
1440 Tho. Green,
Nich. Glover.
1442 John Fox,
John Lord.
1443 Walt.Wirley,
Rich. Baxter.
1445 John Fox,
John LfOrd.
1448 John Belgrave,
Tho. Green.
1450 JohnCatler.
Tho. Green.
1451 John Joiner,
John Belgrave.
1452 Tho. Painter,
John Fox.
1454 Tho. Fbinter,
John Cutler.
1455 Tho. Green,
John Cutler.
1456 Tho. Green,
Rich. Nicholls.
1457 John Fox,
Will. Taylor.
1458 John Cutler.
Rich. Nichollfl.
VUl.
TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWK.
A.D.
STAPVORMBIRS.
WARWI
1459
Rog. Spicer,
Will. Taylor.
1460
JohnBaiber,
WiU. Gierke.
1461
Witt. Green.
Witt. Taylor.
1462
Rob. Spioer,
Witt. Taylor.
1469
Tho. Weaver,
Tho. Tory.
1470
John Lamb,
Tho. Tovy.
1488
John Lamb,
Hen. WiUiamaon.
1504
Witt. Tovy.
Witt. Moore.
1505
John Ellicote,
WiU.Tovy. (July21.)
1507
WiU. Moore,
WiU. Tovy.
1508
John Gierke,
John Lago.
1509
WiU. Tovy,
Witt. Cartwright.
1511
WiU. Tovy,
John Chaddock.
1516
WiU. Tory,
Nich. Webster.
1517
JohnLago,
Tho. Wade.
1530
Tlio. Reeve,
Nich. Webster.
1547
Hen. Osborne,
Nich. Priest.
Note 5.
page 103.
NAMES OF CHAMBERLAmS.
From the Cottrt RolU,
1455 JohnWattLcr,
John Prince.
1456 Nich. Rogeley,
Rich. KeeUng. (Oct. 26.)
APPENDIX. IX.
A.D. 8TAPPORD8HIRX. WARWICKSHIRE.
1470 John Cheadle,
John Joiner. (Oct. 23.)
1488 Rob. Goldson,
John White. (Nov.)
1505 Rich. Green,
Tho. Goldson. (Oct. 21.)
1507 Nich. Moore,
Tho. Tovy. (Nov.)
1508 Will. Harrison,
Rich. Woodshaw. (Oct.)
1511 Tho. Woodshaw,
Rich. Green, (Nov.)
1516 Rob. Wilcox,
Fran. Gierke. (Oct. 12.)
Note 6, page 103.
NAMES OF CONSTABLES.
From the Court Rotta.
1 390 John de Coton, jan. (Ap. 26.)
1441 Rob. Tovy. (Ap. 11.)
1455 Nich. Rngeley.
1470 Tho. Weaver. (Oct. 23.)
1488 WiU. Camvile. (Nov.)
1 505 John Green. (Oct. 2 1 .)
1507 Rich. Gierke. (Nov.)
1508 Rog. Ball. (Oct)
1509 WiD. Gaudy. (Oct. 15.)
1510 John Brown.
1511 Ralph Lago. (Nov.)
1516 John Swepson. (Oct. 12.)
Note 7, Page 105.
" Sup' Interr' ex parte Bett vers' Humfrid' Ferreys, mil',
mi'strat.
Ser Hnmfrey Ferreys, Knight, of the Gom' of Warwyk,
swome : —
To the fyrst, second, and iij^, he saith that he, accompanyd
with one Thomas Swynton, s'unt to Sr. George Gryffith, knight,
and no other p'sones, mett with the said Bett in the parishe
church of Tamworth on the same Relique Sondaye, after evin-
song, and demandyd of hym whye he did not wayte and geve
attendaunce vppon this deponent as high Steward of the same
b
X. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
Towne, on that daye, according to the custome. The aaide Bett
answering ageine saide. That this depo't shuld comaunde theym to
wayte uppon him to whome he gave mete and drinke to ; saying
farther that he was bounde to wayte Tppon the Bayli^, and that
the king's grace nor this deponent or my Lorde Bergeys had nooght
to doo within the same towne, sayng that the king had gyren
and grauntyd all his pryvilege w^in the same towne to the said
Baylyffes ther. And this deponent, hering that, saide vnto the
said Bett, ' Avannt, knave, wottest thowe what thow sayest ? '
and with that, he saithe, he gave him a lytel lyk on the cheke
with his hand; and otherwise he dyd not assaute hym or bett hym,
or had any other company then is abovesaide.
verw* Jek '^^ *^® "y^' ^^» "*^ ^i*^» ^^'® deponent saith that
•up*. . .firactu' he, beyng highe Steward of the same towne, beyng
probat* coiim ^ccompanyd with Thomas Swynton, John Dorlaston.
John Coke, and no moe p'sones, this deponent hauing a croese
wafter in his hand, and thather hauing swerds, as they vse dayly
to go withall, at ix of the clocke of the same night, came to se
the king's watche kept there at that tyme ; and saithe that, as he
was so passing by the dore of the said Jeks, y^ was tolde this
deponent that ther wer certeyne p'sones at the said Jekes' howse
in counsell upon the matter betweene the said Bett and this
deponent. Wheruppon this deponent, to thentent that the said
Jekes shuld knowe that he was ther p'sent, did knocke oene
knocke at the said Jekes' dore, and merely bad him good night,
and no otherwise dyd assaute or breke the same dores, or saw
the same Jekes, as y^ is co'teyned in this Interogatorye.
venus Bett. To the vij*^, viij^, ix**", and x***, he saythe the con-
t™)^crborS- taynts of all this Interr* be vntrewe : and saithe y* he
one. neu' assawted y* howse of the said Bett, or mad any
other suche crye, as it is contayned in thes Inter'. And Saithe
forther that he knewe not at that tyme whch the howse of the
sayde Bett was. And otherwyse denyethe the contents of this
Interr' to be trewe.
veraut Bdys To the xj**», and xij*^, he saithe that he neu' spake
de^ti^iT* ^y Buche words, or thretened the sayd £klys, as it is
pontis. contayned in this Interr'; and saithe allao that the
sayd Edys denyethe any suche words to have byn by this depo-
nent. Before the Justice of peace and xij other honest p'sons
beinge p'sent.
▼emu Tigi. To the xiij*^, he saithe that he neu' assawted or bett
^•to««- any of the kyng's wache at any tyme : howbeyt, he
saithe that on Nicholas Smyth, beinge a newcome s'vaunt to this
deponent, mett withe ij of the sayd wachmen which wold not
speake to him, as the sayd Smythe reported ; and theruppon,
susspectinge them to haye byn faulse knaves, drew his swerde and
APPENDIX. XI.
strake at them, this deponent vnknowinge of the same, vutyll the
next daye that the Bayleffe of the towne complayned vnto this
deponent theroff: wherupon this deponent, aft' the trewthe exam-
yned, delyu'ed the same Smythe, his s'vant, to the sayd bayleffe
to be therfor imprysoned and punysshed : and theropon was so
Imprysoned.
rmnaa To the xiiij^, and xv^, he saithe that, as it fortuned
^^'**'- this deponent to be in Tamworth on Corpus X'pi day
last, ther beinge a playe in the whiche the sayd Wyll'm Carre was
disguysed and played the part of a dyvell, havinge great chaynes
of Iron abowt hym, and so com'ynge rudly by this deponent
streake this deponent on the shynnes withe his chaynes ; wher-
opon this deponent sayd unto his sVauntes, ' Is ther none of
yowe that wyll gyve hym a blowe ?' and ther opon the sayd
Anderson, his s'vaunte, went to the sayd Carre and demawnded of
hym why he hurt his master so withe his chayne. The sayd
Carre answeringe aga3me, ' Why, knave, he might have stoude
forther owt of my way then.' The sayd Anderson, heringe hym
make suche a lewde answere, strake hym on the hede with his
dagger.
nmrabon? To the X9}^, he saithe he neu' assawted or bett any
uitTisiiantes of the inhabytants of the same towne of Tamworth, or
ley in wayt to bett them.
Beneprobuit To the last, he saithe that he, as the high Steward
nanteTfoOT- t^^r, hathe dyu's tymes walked in the night tyme to se
tn.) the king's wache kept ; and suche as he halhe fownd
neglygent, them he hathe punyssed."
Note 8. page 109.
LIST OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT.
From the CorporttiUm Recorda, and other Boureet.
5 Eliz. 1563 Michael Harcourt« esq.
Robert Harcourt, esq.
13 Eliz. 1571 Edward Lewkner, esq.
John Bidlock, esq.
14 Eliz. 1572 Launcelot Bostock, esq.
John Nuttal, esq.
26 Eliz. 1584 John Breton, esq.
Clement Fisher, esq. (Nov. 6.)
28 Eliz. 1586 Walter Bagot, esq.
John Ferrers, esq.
30 Eliz. 1588 Edward Devereux, esq.
Rob. Wright, esq. (Oct. 12.)
Xll. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
35 Eliz. 1592 John Ferrers, esq.
Thomas Smith, gent.
39 Eliz. 1597 William Temple, gent. (Sept. 8,)
George Hide, esq. (Oct. 3.)^
43 Eliz. 1601 George Egioke, esq.
Rohert Burdet, esq.
I Jac. I. 1603 Sir Percival Willonghby, knt.
Sir John Ferrers, knt. (Mar. 1)
12 Jac. I. 1615 Sir John Ferrers, knt.
Basil Fielding.
18 Jac. I. 1621 Sir Tho. Puckering, knt. & hart. (Dec. 28.)
John Ferrour, citizen & merchant of London.
21 Jac. I. 1624 John Wightwick, esq.
John Woodford, esq. (Jan. 19.)
1 Car. I. 1625 Sir Thomas Puckering, knt. and bart.
John Skeffington, esq.
3 Car. I. 1627 Sir Thomas Puckering, knt. and bart.
Sir Walter Devereux. knt. (Feb. 1 6)
15 Car. I. 1639 George Abbot, esq.
Sir Simon Ardier, bart.
16 Car. I. 1640 Fernando Stanhope, esq.
Peter Wentworth, K.B.
George Abbot, esq.
12 Car. II. 1660 John, lord Clifiord.
John Swinfen, esq.
13 Car. II. 1661 John, lord Clifibrd.
John Swinfen, esq. (Apr.)
23 Car. II. 1670 Charles, lord Clifford.
[John Ferrers, esq.]*
31 Car. IT. 1679 John Swinfen, esq.
Sir Thomas Thynne. (Aug. 11.)
31 Car. II. 1679 Sir Andrew Hacket, knt.
Sir Thomas Thynne. (Feb. 25.)
32 Car. II. 1680 John Swinfen, esq.
— Turton, esq. (Feb. 28.)
1 Jac. II. 1685 Richard How, esq.
Sir Henry Gough, knt.
1 W. & M. 1688 Henry Sidney, esq.
Sir Henry Gough, knt.
2 W. & M. 1690 Walter Chetwynd, esq.
Sir Henry Gough, knt.
5 W. & M. 1693 Michael Biddulph, esq.
7 W. & M. 1695 Thomas Guy, esq.
Sir Henry Gough, knt.
1 The fonner of Uiese representativeB was elected for Ute put of the town in
Staflbrdshire, the latter for that in Warwickshire. The wilts sometimes came down
from both coanty-towns; bat generally, and always of late, from Staflbrd.
2 The names within brackets arc those of ansucccssfdl candidates.
APPENDIX. Xlll.
10 W. & M. 1698. Thomas Guy, eaq.
John Chetwynd, esq.
[Sir Henry Gough, knt.]
12 Will. 1700 Thomas Guy. esq.
Sir Henry Gongh, knt.
[John Chetwynd, esq.]
13 Will. 1701 Thomas Guy, esq.
Henry Thynne, esq.
1 Anne 1702 Thomas Guy, esq.
Henry Thynne esq. (Sept.)
4 Anne 1705 Thomas Guy, esq.
Joseph Girdler, esq.
6 Anne 1707 Joseph Girdler, esq.
Ricluuti Swinfen, esq.
[Thomas Guy, esq.]
7 Anne 1708 Joseph Girdler, esq.
RiduEurd Swinfen, esq.
9 Anne 1710 Joseph Girdler, esq.
Samuel Braoebridge, esq.
2 Anne 1713 Francis Willoughby, esq.
Samuel Braoebridge, esq.
[Richard Swinfen, esq.]
[John Jarvis, esq.] (Mar. 24.)
1 Geo. I. 1714 William Inge, esq.
Samuel Bracebridge, esq. (Mar.
8 Geo. I. 1722 Francis Willoughby, esq.
George Compton, esq.
iGeo. II. 1727 Lord Inchequin.
Thomas Willoughby, esq.
8 Geo. II. 1734 Lord John Philip Sackyille,
Charles Cotes, M.D.^
15 Geo. II. 1741 Lord John Philip Sackville.
Charles Cotes, M.D.
21 Geo. II. 1747 Sir Henry Harper, hart.
Thomas Villiers, esq.
27 Geo. II. 1 754 Sir Robert Burdet, bart.
Lord Villiers.
1 Geo. III. 1761 Sir Robert Burdet, bart.
Lord Villiers.
6 Geo. III. 1766 Sir Robert Burdet, bart.
Lord Villiers.
8 Geo. III. 1768 Edward Thurlow, esq.
William de Grey, esq.
I He mazTied. on the 2nd of September, 17S8, the only daughter of Chesddeo, the
celebrated surgeon.
XIV. TAMWORTH CASTLB AND TOWN.
10 Geo. III. 1770 Edward Thurlow. esq.
Charles Vernon, esq.
15 Geo. III. 1774 Edward Thurlow, esq.
Thomas de Grey. Jan., esq.
21 Geo. IIL 1780 John Coortenay, esq.
24 Geo. III. 1784 John Conrtenay, esq.
30 Geo. III. 1790 Robert Peel, esq.
John Courtenay, esq.
36 Geo. III. 1796 Robert Peel, esq.
Thomas Carter, esq.
42 Geo. III. 1802 Sir Robert Peel, bart.
Major-Gen. William Loftos. (July.)
45 Geo. III. 1806 Sir Robert Peel, bart.
Major-Gen. William Loftos. CSor, 3.)
47 Geo. III. 1807 Sir Robert Peel. bart.
Major-Gen. William Loftos. (Mav.)
52 Geo. III. 1812 Sir Robert Peel. bart.
Lord Charles Townshend.
58 Geo. III. 1818 Sir Robert Peel, bart.
William Yates Peel. esq.
[Lord Charles Townshend.] (June.)
I Geo. IV. 1820 Lord Charles Townshend.
William Yates Peel, esq.
7 Geo. IV. 1826 Lord Charles Townshend.
William Yates Peel, esq.
1 Will. IV. 1830 Sir Robert Peel, bart.
Lord Charles Townshend.
2 Will. IV. 1831 Sir Robert Peel, bart.
Lord Charles Townshend.
3 Will. IV. 1832 Sir Robert Peel. bart.
Lord Charles Townshend.
6 Win. IV. 1835 Sir Robert Peel, bart.
William Yates Peel, esq. (Jan.)
1 Vict. 1837 Sir Robert Peel, bart.
Capt. Edward Henry k Court, R.N.
[Capt. John Townshend, R.N.]
5 Vict. 1841 Sir Robert Peel. bart.
Capt. Edward Henry k Court, R.N.
[Capt. John Townshend, R.N.] (June 29.)
Note 9, page 115.
A rough draught endorsed : —
" Sir Humfrey Ferrers, for Tamworth stewardship. S' Hum-
frey's I'res to my lo. Treasurer & & Robert Cedll."
"May it please yo' honor to be advertysed that whereas
6' John Ferrers, my grete grandfather, & others of my aunces-
/
APPENDIX. XV.
tors, had & enioyed the stewardship of Tamw., by graunt vnder
the 'xchequer scale, durant' benepl'lt' ; And the kte Lo. Treasurer,
yo' Lo. p'decessor, p'cured me the like graunt thereof fi-om her
niatte . ^ch Qfljce afterwards the Earle of Essex obteyned from her
ma*^ vnder the grete seale. By meanes whereof, some contro-
versie was like to have growne betweene him & me, for the same.
Wherevpon I, being requested and advysed by yo' Lo. p'decessor
not to oppose my self agaynst the said Ekirle for an office of so
little value, I was contented to indure that wrong, during the
Earle's life, but held my patente still in force. And after his
decease, I entred vpon the said office as I was advysed I lawfully
might. Since -w^^ my entrie, I vnderstand that S^^ Jo. Egerton
(vpon informacon given to yo' lo. that the said stewardshipp was
in her ma^^* hands, by the attaynder of the said Earle, & yo' lo.
having no notice of my patente) he hath obtayned a graunt
thereof, vnder the 'xchequer seale, durant' benepVit' ; And hath
sent vnto me to geve me notice thereof, as a dischardge for me :
w<^ I hope yo' lo. will not consider to be a sufficient dischardge,
for that, as I am advised by my counsell, the like hath not beene
scene that a second patent hath bene graunted to any man
w^ut some cause of misdemeano' in the first patentee ; whereof
I humbly pray yo'^ bono' to have consideracon, & the rather for
that I have of long tyme done her ma^® faithfull service in the
office of a iustice of the peace in iij Counties, & never made sute
to her ma**« for any thing but this office, w«*» my aunccstors had
before enioyed, and w^ I doe assure yo^ honor, vpon my creditt,
is no more than the bare name of a steward, and not otherwise
worth ijd. ; nor more wold I esteeme of it, but that my chef
house adioyneth to the towne of ^amworth. And thus praying
yo' hon**»*« fevo', that I may stUl enioy the said stewardshipp, for
w<* I shall ever acknowledge my self bound vnto yo^ honor,
w^^ due remembrance of my humble dutie, I take my leave, from
my house at Tamw., this 23 August, 1602.
yo' lor. in all dutie To the right honorable the lo. Buckhurst,
to be commended. lord highe Treasurer of England."
The letter to sir Robert Cecil, is substantially the same.
Note 10, page 115.
" To the King's most excellent m^e, the humble petition
of the Baylies & Com'inality of yo^ Highnesse towne of
Tameworth, in yo' countyes of Warricke & Staff.
Shewinge y* wher', for the gouem^ of the same towne,
ther is an ancient corp'acon of Baylies & com'inalty in the same,
for whose ayd ther haue beene a Recorder & Townclerke or
XVI. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
v'd 8tew^, in the gift of the Baylies & oom'inalty, and a High-
steward, in the gift of yo'^ highnesse & yo^ p'genitcxis.
Wher* the same office of Highsteward hath anciently heene
wonted to he granted to & Hum&ey Ferrers* knight, & his ances-
tors, beinge gentlemen of worth & neighbors to yo^ seyd sahiects
& their p'decessors, & therefore fittest to be' imployd in the
affayres of the same, for the co'en good therof : and wher'
the same sir Hamfrey Ferrers, having the same Highstewardship.
at the request of Robert, the last Earle of Essex, a geantleoaan
borne ther, yelded the same vnto him ; & by the death of this
Earle, the same is now in yo^ m^es grant, yo^ seyd sabiectB
most humbly beseech yo^ highnesse to grant vnto the same air
Hamfrey Ferrers, & his heyres male of las body, the said High-
stewardship, beinge a place of small value, w^ut com'odity, by
whose neighborhciodde (wherby they have a felloo feelinge of
yo' said sahiects' necessaryes, w<^ others further of cannot have
a feelinge of) they may be comforted & releeved, to the increase
of there litel co'en welth in the same towne : & yo' seyd sahiects
will dayly pray for the p's'vation of yo^ most roiall p'son, longe
to raigne ou' us."
Note 11, page 117.
[Endorsed]
" Charges ag* the Bailifis of Tamworth : open requests
mayd by Mr. F.^ vnto Robert Scale, and others of the
bayliffs, y* y* matters might be talked of & ended.
Yf ther be any matter consemyng my misbehavior towards
the erle,' I desyer to satisfy y^ matter fyrst, desyring to
know my p'ticoler accusers.
desyeins to see y* Articles of grifies exhebitid vnto
y* Erie, and who were y* devysors y'^of by name.
Notes of the abvses of the bailiffes of Tamwo'th.
Imp'mis. John Stookes and Thom's Ashlock, bailiffes, receaved
by composicion for money a great company of egyptions into the
said towne, and kept them there three dais, wherof one was the
markett day : all w^ dais both the said Baylifies w^ same others
of there brethren kept the chifie of the Egyptcions company in
the taveme ; all w^ tyme, the other pikinge eg3rptcions were in
the markett pikinge purses and pocketts, and cut dyvers parses
from the bodies of dyvers p'sons, both men and women; and when
the parties greaved complained them to the bailiffies and requested
justice, the said bayliffes did commonly, in the said taveme,
make composicion betweene the cutt purses and the parties
greaved, and caused the parties greaved to have redeliu'ed
vnto him or them sume p'te of his or theire goodes by anye [pro-
1 Protebly Homphiy Ferren. s The earl of Baaex.
AFPBNDIX. XVll.
portion], sume tymes halfe, Bume tymes the thirde parte, and
same tymea lease, and deliu'ed the aame egyptdona the thirde
daye w»out any treble.
It'm, the said Stoka and Will'm Shemon beinge bailifies, ^ppon
A feer day there were dyvera poraea cntt and greate sumea of
money in ihem ; and a man was seen, very aaspicionalie mnninge
out of the towne'a ende, by one Richard Baylie, who followed
him, for that he waa a auapected p'son ; and [he then] fled on the
fyldea oat of any highe way aa fiaat aa he colde nmne, waa taken
and brought back againe into the towne, and deliu'ed into
the handea of the aaid Shemon, in hia owne house ; [the captor]
dedaringe to the aaid Shemon the manner of hia runninge out of
the towne, w**^ that the aaid auspected p'son offered him all the
money in his purse and hia clooke ao that he wolde lett him goe,
and not ddiu' him vnto the Bayliffes. notw^standinge, the aaid
Bayliffes lett him goe w^ut any publick examinacion, or any
punishme't at all, w^Nrat it were aecret punyshme't of the purse.
It'm, one Henry Bucklande being slayne by dyvera persons in
fight, w^ dwelt in Tamworth, wherof fyve or sixe of Uiem were
Arested of murder by wiUiam Bucklande and deliu'ed into the
bandes of the said Shemon and Stoka, who railed at the said
Will'm Bucklande and lett the prisoners & feUous goe w^ut
stayinge them, and threetened the said Buckland for diat he had
arrested the said p'ties; w^ afterwards were indited three tymea
of wilfiiU murder for the same cause, and the Queene . • . ed
the bodies of them.
It'm, Robert Scale and John Wright, beinge bailiffes, staid a
fellon vppon suspicion of fellony for steelinge three horses, in the
tyme of there last Bayliewicke ; w^ three horsea they toke from
lum, and sent him away w^out any further punishment, and con-
verted the horaea to ther own uses', and gave the theefe money to
bye him a paire of shoes to goe hia way.
It'm, the aaid Robert Scale and John Wright now being
Bayliffes, ther cam a fellou to the towne of Tamworth vppon a
fake day about m'helmas last past w^ fbwre fatt oxen, w^ were
well worth xvi^. ; and solde them to a man of Ser George
Hastings for xii'<. ; who, aa sone as be had bought them, said to
the standers bye that he mistrusted they were trulie comen by,
for that they were much more worth; not w^standinge [he]
wente to the toole-both and entred them bought and sold ; and
then the buyar and the seller drove them throughe the markett to
the Inne of the Buyare; and aipter the theefe fled, and the
Bayliffes aforesaid wdde have seised the oxen, but the buyare
said he had toled for them, wherfore the p'pertie beinge changed,
they colde not have them, But confessed he had not paid for
them, and that he owede the theefe for them the sume of twelve
XVIU. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
poundes, which said sume of zii" the said Bailifies reoeaved of the
said partie, by vertue of there office ; and w^^in three days after,
the right owner of the aaide oxen came to inquire for them, and
heiringe of the p'missea demanded the aaid Money ; but w^ much
adoe, he got of them ifj'', and the rest he colde not gett of them,
nether the oxen«
The said Bayliffes, ▼nd'standinge that the theefe waa goen»
made proclamacion in the towne that he ahnlde come to the
Bwanne and receave his money, and after [he] receayed it ; and
[they] gave ther wordea to save the bnyare harmeleaa, and never
sent hue nor crye after the theefe at all,
I*tm, Peter Braddock and Nicholas Wilcox, beinge Bailifiii,
vnd'standinge that a smyth, servant to Mr. Robynso', had stolen
a horse and had curtoled him, and that he was w^ the aaid horse
at one Cullu'bines, in Tamworth w^in there libertie, they both
went thither and toke away the said horse, and willingly lett the
felloQ escape ; and Braddock kept the horse ij or thiee yeres ;
after which [it] was worth v*.
John Turner and Henry Baron beinge Bayliffes, a pooreman,
by a capias from them, arested a detter of his for xx^ marks,
who confessed the accion and Judgment geven by the said
Bailifis and Greene there Stewarde : the p'tie beinge in there
prison was after lett goe ; and the pooreman to this bower can
not gett his money nor any p't therof, by meanes of the caviD
w^ a rasure, — an error of the reoorde in Uiere owne court."
Note 12, page 141.
NAMES OF BAILIFFS.
From the CorponMom ReeordM, ParUk Regiutert ^.
1560 Peter Bradock, Henry Draper.
1561 Walter Harconrt. Christopher Wiston.
1569 Robert Batman.
1580 John Coleman.
1581 Richard Wright.
1582 William Baron.
1584 Thomas Hilton. Anthony Weyman.
1588 Henry Baron, Thomas Ashley.
John Wright.
1592 John Allen.
1597 Thomas Alcock, Christopher Ensor.
1598 Francis Wood.
1600 Ralph Onion, Thomas Sheall.
Thomas Hilton.
1 603 Thomas Alcock, Edward Vaughton.
1616 Hugh Clarke.
1619 Thomas Ashley, John Sharp.
APPENDIX. XIX.
1627 Clement Joell, Richard Lattymer.
1628 Julius Aloock.
1631 Thomas Wright.
1639-40 Thomas Vaughton, Edward White,
1646 Thomas Lawkin.
1653 William Chitwell.
1654 — Ashley.
1659 Leicester Barher, Thomas Alcock.
1662 John Clifton, John Lattimer.
1 663 Walter Ashmore, Thomas Egginton .
1 664 Robert Peake, Robert Jennings.
1665 William Wikox, Thomas Carter.
1666 Christopher Harthill, Robert Jeffrey.
1667 William Cawne, Thomas Talbut.
1 668 Thomas Key, John Bankes.
1669 John Clifton, Thomas Pratt.
1670 Gilbert Jordan, Cornelius Osbom.
1671 Thomas Egginton, Francis Wright.
1672 Morgan PoweU, Edward Drayton.
1 673 Edward Symonds, Joseph Key.
1 674 Robert Peake, William Ashley.
1675 Thomas Roades, Charles Baynton.
1676 John Welsh, John Vaughton.
1677 Christopher Harthill, William Harding.
1678 John Vamham, Francis Wright.
1679 Morgan Powell, Daniel Jordan.
1 680 Morgan Powell, William Wilcox.
1 681 William Cawne, Thomas Talbut.
1682 Josiah Newey, Charles Baynton.
1683 Robert Peake, John Vaughton.
1684 Francis Wood, Samuel Orton.
1685 Thomas Roades, Edward Drayton.
1686 Daniel Jordan, Richard Weaman.
1687 Samuel Buckland, William Harding.
1688 William Wilcox, Francis Wright.
Samuel Buckland, William Harding.
1 689 Charles Baynton, Thomas Talbut.
1 690 John Vaughton, Josiah Radford.
1 69 1 Richard Weyman, Edward Bradgate.
1692 Thomas Wagstaff, David Read.
1693 Samuel Orton, Robert Cawne.
1694 Daniel Jordan, William Harding.
1695 Francis Wood, John Vaughton.
1696 Jonathan Backhouse, Charles Parker.
1697 Joseph Batman, Samuel Dawes.
1698 Robert Green, William Pickard.
XX. TAMWORTH CA8TLB AND TOWK.
1699 JoMph Batman, jnn., John Vanglitoo, m
1 700 Daniel Jordan, John Vaoghton.
1701 Edward Symonds, Samvel Qrton.
1 702 John Radford, Ridiard Weaman.
1 703 Thomas Monidey, George Hood.
1704 Samuel Backland, John Vanghton.
1 705 Daniel Jordan, John Vanghton.
1706 Thomas Homer, Richard Knight.
1 707 Edward Bradgate, Samuel Leigh.
1 708 Charles Pteker, David Read.
1 709 Jonathan Badchoose, Thomaa Docker.
1710 Samnel Dawea. Samuel Shaw.
1711 John Seal, Isaac Orton.
1712 Charles Ptarker, RidiaTd Weaman.
1713 Reginald Princeps, Joseph Hood.
1714 Joseph Alport, Samnd Leigh.
1715 Samnel Bnckland, Wflliam Pickard.
1716 Thomas Batman, Sanraol Dawes.
1717 Thomas Farmer* John lUhnt.
1718 Charles Fuker, Jonathan Backhoose.
1719 Samud Dawes, Jan., Nicholas Sihrester.
1 720 Joseph Alport, Joseph Hood.
1 721 Joseph Alport. John KeodaU.
1 722 Samuel Shaw, Edward Lilly.
1 723 Thomas Farmer, Beilhy Layoock.
1724 Joseph Alport, Beilhy Layoock.
1 725 Charles Holden, Joseph Hood.
1 726 Samnel Dawes, John Kendsll.
1 727 Thomas Vanghton, Beilby Laycock.
1728 John Bradgate, Samnel Rice.
1 729 John Mcacham, John Bntler.
1 730 Charies Holden, Joseph Hood.
1 73 1 Edward Lilly, Samuel Rioe.
1732 John Lattimer, John Kendall.
1 733 Charles Holden, Joseph Hood.
1 734 Samuel Nickens, Abraham Waterson.
1 735 Thomas Vanghton, Thomas Oakes.
1 736 William Beech, Isaac Brocket
Samuel Dawes.
1 737 John Bradgate, John Osbom.
1 738 John Meacham, Joseph Hood.
1 739 John Lattimer, John Butler.
1 740 Edward Woodcock, Samuel Nickins.
1 74 1 Jdm Gibbons, John Osborne.
1742 Joseph Hood, Samuel Prinoqi.
1 743 Waiter Rose, Samuel Nickins.
APPBNDIX. XXI.
1 744 John Bindley» John Oshom.
1 745 Samuel Dawes, John Pojrnton.
1 746 Abraham WaterBon» John Kendal.
John Meaoham.
1 747 John Lattimer, Thomas Hinckea.
1748 John Gibbons, Edward Woodcock.
1 749 Peter Goodwin, John Vatighton.
1 750 Samiid Princep, James OUver.
1 75 1 Walter Rose, Joseph Barrow.
1752 John Osbom, Jdbn Bindley.
1 753 Samuel Dawes, Edward Woodcock.
1754 John Latimer, John Kendal.
1 755 John Gibbons, Thomas Hindces.
1 756 Peter Godwin, Nathaniel Crosland.
1757 Samnd PHncep, John Vaughton*
1758 Samuel Pipe, John Gibbons.
1 759 James Oldershaw, Rev* Sfanoa Collins.
1 760 John Lattimer, Benjamin Price.
1 761 Samuel Princep, James Oliver.
1 762 Samuel Crosland, Joaeph Allport.
1763 Edward Ball, John Kendal.
Jdin Vanghton.
1764 Thomas Hinckes, William Weston.
1 765 John Vaug^ton, Walter Howe.
1 766 John Willington, John Bk)od.
1 767 James Oldershaw, Thomas Butler.
1768 Edward Woodcock, Joseph Heath.
Thomas Nichblls.
Nathaniel Crosland.
1769 Thomas Freenum, Thomas Hohnes.
1770 Rev. Simon Collins, George Godfrey.
1771 John Wilson, Walter Lyon.
1 772 Job Hunter, Francis Woodcock.
1773 James OKver, John Bindley.
1774 Thomas Hinckes, William Dyall.
1775 John Vaughton, Samuel Heath.
1776 John WOlington, Walter Howe.
1777 James Oldershaw, Thomas Butler.
1778 Rev. John Halsted, Edward Ball.
llMmas Hdmes.
1779 Rev. Simon Collins, Edward Ball.
1780 Thomas Hohnes, Richard Freeman.
1781 James Gray, George Godfrey.
1782 WUliam Gresley, Williams Rice.
1 783 James Yeomans, Joshua Brown.
1 784 Joseph Heath, Walter Lyon.
XZU. TAMWORTH CAtTLB AND TOWK.
1 785 Thomas Hinckee, Joshua Bindky .
] 786 John Waiington, WiDiam Bmdley.
1787 Walter Howe, John Brown.
1 788 Richard ¥Veeman. Thomas WOlington.
1 789 Rev John Halsted, Thomas Holmes.
1790 Rev. Simon Collins, Samuel Whitehoose.
1791 James Yeomans, Thomas Harper.
1 792 Walter Lyon, Williams Rioe.
1 793 John WOlington, Edward Bage.
1794 Thomas Hawkesworth, John Harding.
1795 FVancis Woodcock, Henry Bennet.
1 796 Joshua Brown, Thomas WiUington.
1 797 Joseph Heath, Thomas Holmes.
1 798 William Bindley, James Yeomans.
1799 Joshua Marshall, John Marriott.
1 800 Richard Bird, lliomas Arnold.
1801 Richard Freeman, Thomas Wallis.
1 802 Williams Rice, Thomas B. Fkiget.
1803 Joseph Heath, Thomas Hohnes.
1804 Rev. Michael Ward, ^^Hlliam Parsons.
1805 Edward Bage, Robert Nevill.
1806 Robert Woody, John Harding.
1807 Rev. Charles £dw. Collins, Daniel Harper.
1 808 Henry Bennet, William Bindley.
1 809 Joseph Knight, Samuel Tylecote.
1810 William Alport, Thomas Bennet.
1811 William Bindley, jun., Richard Pipe.
1812 Richard Bird, Thomas Wallis.
1813 Josiah Marshall, Thomas Arnold.
1814 lliomaa B. Pbget, Joseph Heath.
1815 Rev. Samuel Downes, Richard F. A. Freeman.
1816 Rev. Michael Ward, William Pfeursons.
1817 Rev. Fhmcis Blick, Edward Thurman.
1818 Richard Bennet, Thomas Buckerfield.
1819 Shirley Pftlmer, M.D., James Pipe.
1820 Robert Nevill, Robert Woody.
1821 John Harding, John Hall.
1822 Joseph Knight, William Persons.
1 823 Samuel Tylecote, Thomas Bennet.
1824 William Robinson, Thomas Freeman.
1825 William Bindley, jun., Robert C. Brown.
1 826 Richard Bird, Charles J. Berry.
1827 Joseph Heath, Francis WiUington.
1828 R. F. A. Freeman, William Parsons, sen.
1829 Thomas Buckerfield, James Pipe.
1830 Robert Fowler, Henry Wood Roby.
APPENDIX. ZXUl.
1831 Shirley Palmer, M.D.. William Cox.
1832 Robert Nevill, John Hall.
1833 Joseph Knight, John Thompson.
1834 Rev. Rob. W. lioyd. Thomas Arnold.
1835 Thomas Bramall, Robert K. Fallows.
Note 13. page 141.
NAMES OF HIGH STEWARDS.
FfOtn tht CofporsMoA Rtcords^
1663 James Compton, earl of Northampton. He was nominated
in Charles's charter.
1681 Sir Thomas Thynne, hart. (Dec. 22.)^ He was afterwards
created lord viscount Weymouth.
1715 lliomas Willoughby, lord Middleton. (Mar. 29.)
1729 Lionel Cranfield Sackville, doke of Dorset. (Ap. 12.) On
the 28th of June, 1733, he resigned in favour of his
successor.
1733 Thomas, Thynne, lord viscount Weymouth. (June 28.) He
died on the 13th of January, 1750.
1 750 John Carteret, earl of Grenville. (Jan. 24,) He was the re-
presentative of the late lord Weymouth ; to whose son he
resigned the stewardship, on the 25th of June, 1 756.
1756 Lord viscount Weymouth. (June 25.) In 1789, he was
created marquess of Bath.
1796 George, marquess Townshend. (Dec. 10.)
1807 George, marquess Townshend. (Nov. 27.) He succeeded
upon the death of his father.
1811 Sir Robert Peel, hart. (Sept. 24.)
1830 Right hon. sir Robert Peel, hart. (May 19.) He succeeded
his father ; and retained the office until its abolition.
Note 14, page 141.
NAMES OF TOWN CLERKS.
From ike CorponMam Reeorig,
1593 Henry Michell. He retained office to his death, in 1629.
1664 John Allen. He was named in Charles's charter.
1685 Morgan PoweU. (Apr.)
1698 Nicholas Parker. (Oct. 14.)
1 The times of the elecdoDs of hlgh-ttewwds, town-derkt, and racardcn, tre
the dates of their nomlnattoii bj the corpontkm. not of their patents.
XXIY. TAM WORTH CA8TLB AKD TOWN.
1724 NicholuB Parker. (Jnlj 20.) He was son of the former.
On bis decease, the next election was disputed ; as it
appears from the following order made by the corporatioa
on the 1st of Aogost, 1738. " Ord«^ that the law-
charges. 39/. ld«. 4d., incarred in opposing Mr. Hum-
phry WoWerstan's being Town Clerk, before the
Attorney-General, be paid out of the town-box."
1738 Beilby Laycock. (Aug. 14.) He was elected on the death
of Nicholas Parker.
1741 Samuel Beardsley. (March 16.) He resigned on the 11th
of May. 1759.
1759 Edward Wolverstan. jun. (May 11.) He resigned on the
1st of August. 1763.
1763 Charles Oakes. (Aug. 1.) He retained the oflke for fifty-
two years.
1815 Thomas Willington. (Aug. 1.)
1834 Francis WiUin^on. (April 7.)
Note 15, page 141.
NAMES OF RECORDERS.
f^wn the CorponMom Bec9rd$,
1599 Anthony Dyott. (July 24.) With this office he had an
annual sdarv of 4Ciir. He was a member of parliament
for Lichfield in 1601, 1603, and 1614.
1664 Thomas Flint. (Sept. 26.)
1670 Sir Andrew Hacket. knt. (Sept. 19.) He resigned.
1688 Francis Wolverstan. (Not. 19.) On the 26th of October,
1691, he was displaced for having neglected to take the
required oaths of office,
1 69 1 Philip Pargiter, coundllor-at-law^Temple, London,(Oct. 26.)
1699 Joseph Girdler, sergeant«at.law. (Sept. 21.)
1724 Joseph Girdler, sergeant-at-law. (Nov. 21.) He was cho-
sen on the death of his father ; but was removed by the
corporation, and, at the same time, his successor ap-
pointed.
1740 Hon. Heneage Legge. (Sept. 26.)
1759 Francis Mundy. (June 2;)
1769 Edward Thurlow, (Aug. 1.) He represented this town
in parliament, until his elevation to the peerage. He
died in 1806.
1807 William Hunt. (Aug. 1.) He continued in office until
1835. A salary of 7/. a year had been formerly attached
to the recordership. This gentleman had never received
it; but, in 1835. he wrote to the corporation-commissioner,
asserting his claim to it for twenty-eight years.
APPENDIX. XXV.
Note 16, page 141.
NAMES OF CHAMBERLAINS.
From the Corporaikm Reeor4$»
1688 George Wright. (Aug. 28.) He was elected under the
new charter of James II., but soon lost his office.
1688 Daniel Jordan, Richard Weaman. (Dec. 19.)
1 689 Richard Weaman was directed to continue in office (Jan . 1 6)
and be accordingly did so until 1693. On the 2 1st of
Julj, in that year, it was ordered that there should be
two chamberlains chosen from the members of the cor-
poration, and two from the inhabitants of the town.
1693 Thomas Wagstaffe, David Reade, George Hood, Joseph
Batman. (Aug. 1.)
1694 Robert Cawne, Samuel Orton, John Dawes, lEUchard
Knight. (Aug. 1.)
1695 Daniel Jordan, William Harding. (Aug. 1.) The other
two are not named.
1696 John Vaughton, — Newey, Job Boston, John Radford.
These four are mentioned as being chamberlains on the
1st of August.
1696 John Vaughton, Francis Wood, John Radford, Thomas
Woodcock. (Oct. 6.)
1697 Jonathan Backhouse, Charles Parker, Joseph Wilcox, Jo-
seph Hood. (Aug. 1.)
1698 Joseph Batman, Samuel Dawes, Edward Symonds, John
Vaughton. (Aug. 1.)
1699 Robert Green ; William Pickard ; John Dawes, jun. ; Job
Boston. (Aug. 1.)
1 700 John Vaughton, sen. ; Joseph Batman ; Thomas Mouseley ;
John Hartwell. (Sept. 19.)
1701 Daniel Jordan ; John Vaughton, jun. ; John Seal; John
Toft. (Aug. 1.)
1 702 Edward Symonds, Samuel Orton, Thomas Batman, Arthur
Alsop. (Aug. 1.)
1703 Richard Weaman, John Radford, Samuel Dawes, John
Butler. (Aug. 2.)
1704 Thomas Mouseley, George Hood, Joseph Radford, Henry
Smith. (Aug. 1.)
1705 Samuel Buckland, Richard Weaman. (Aug. 1.)
1705 Samuel Buckland, Thomas Vaughton, John Jordan,
John Onion. (Oct. 18.)
1706 Henry Smith; John Vaughton^ sen. ; Thomas Cooper;
Daniel Jordan. (Aug. 1.)
XXVI. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
1 707 Richard Knight, Thomas Homer, (Sept. 9.) The election
of two inhabitants of the town was now abandoned.
1708 Samuel Leigh. Edward Bradgate. (Sept. 16.)
1710 Jonathan Backhouse, Thomas Docker. (Aug. 1.)
1710 John Vaughton» John Radford. (Dec. 8.)
1711 John Vaughton, John Hall. (Nov. I.) Jolm Vaoghton
remained sole chamberlain, from 1712 to 1714.
1714 Reginald Princep, Joseph Hood. (Jan. 19.) They con-
tinued in office until 1724.
1724 Samuel Dawes, Joseph Hood. (Aug. 10.)
1725 Beilby Lay cock, Joseph Alport. (Dec. 31.) They con-
tinned in office until 1 730.
1730 Thomas Farmer, John Kendal. (Aug. 1.)
1731 Thomas Farmer. (Sept. 20.) He continued until 1735.
1735 Samuel Nickins, Abraham Waterson. (Aug. 1.)
1736 Thomas Vaughton, Thomas Oakes. (Dec. 16.) They
continued until 1739.
1739 Joseph Hood, John Meacham. (Aug. 1.) Tliey contin-
ued until 1 743.
1743 John Osborne, John Gibbons. (Aug. 1.) They continued
until 1747.
1747 John Poynton ; Samuel Dawes, jun. (Aug. 1.) They con-
tinued until 1753.
1753 John Vaughton. Peter Godwin. (Aug. 1.) They contin-
ued until 1 763.
1 763 John Vaughton, Benjamin Price. (Aug. 1 .) They con-
tinued until 1766.
1766 John Vaughton, Walter Howe. (Aug. 1.)
1767 John WiUington, Walter Howe. (July 30.) From 1768
until 1797, the bailifi of the preceeding year were
elected chamberlains, except in two instances.
1769 Joseph Heath, Nathaniel Crosland. (Aug. 1.)
1788 John Bindley, John Brown. (Aug. 1.)
1797 Henry Bennet. (Aug. 1.) He continued sole chamber-
lain until 1812.
1812 Josiah Marshall. (Aug. 1.) He contmued until 1820.
1820 Edward Thurman. (April 27.) He continued for two
years.
1822 John Harding, John Hall. (Aug. 1.)
1823 Joseph Knight; William Parsons, sen. (Aug. 1.)
1824 Samuel Tylecote, Thomas Bennet. (Aug. 1.) On the 6th
of November, Joseph Knight was elected in the room
of the latter, deceased.
1825 William Robinson, Thomas Freeman. (Aug. 1.) They
retained the office, until the old corporate body was
abolished.
APPENDIX. XXYli.
Note 17, page 142.
" The Coppie of the PeticoD.
To the right hono^^ the Knights. Citizens, and Burgesses
of the howse of Com'ons, in this high Conrt of Parlia-
ment now assembled.
The homble peticon of the Inhabitants of the Towne of
Tamworth, in the Counties of Warwick and Stafford,
whose names are underwritten and Indorsed :
Showeing that whereas the said Towne is an Ancient towne,
and the Inhabitants thereof bane, time out of mynde, bene Called
by the name of Bailiffes and Cominaltie, and the Inhabitants
thereof Ame, for the time being, have vsed, time out of mynde,
to dect and Choose two fitt persons to serve in Parliam^ as Bur-
gesses for the said towne.
And whereas alsoe the said towne is a populous towne. Con-
sisting of 300 howsehold", at the least, whoe ought to bane
their voyces in the eleccon of the burgesses to serve in Parliam^
for the said tovme.
Soe it is, may it please yon, that Thomas Vaughton and
Edward White, the nowe Bailiffis of the said towne, together with
21 others stiled, by a late Charter, by the name of Capitall Bur-
gesses of the said towne, did, in the moneth of March last past,
of themselues, without yo' peticoners and the rest of the Inhabi-
tants of the said tovme or anie of them. And without any notice
at all given of the time and place for Eleccon of Burgesses to
serve for the said towne in this p'sent Parliam^, p'ceede to elect
and Choose, and did, without any such notice at all g^ven, vndue-
lie Elect. Choose, and retome one Georg Abbott, a Soioumer in
Caldecote. in the County of Warwick, gent., and S' Symon
Archer, of Tanworth, in the same Countie, knight* to serve in
this p'sent Parliam* as Burgesses for the said Towne.
In tender consideracon whereof, and for that yo' peticioners'
right in Electing of Burgesses for the said towne is not onlie
thereby much intrenched vpon, but the said Eleccon (as yo'
peticoners Conceiue) is illegally and vndnly made, yo' peticoners
humbly pray that the said Election may be declared to be void, and
that a new writt may Issue out for the electing of two Burgesses
to serve in Parliam^ for the said towne : And that such further
order and Direction may be giuen for yo' peticoners' releife as
to Justice shall appertaine. And your peticoners shall &c.
Will™ Comberford. W« Gk)non. Thomas Onyon.
William Brooke. Launcelett Smith. Thomas Roade.
Richard Mowseley. James Prate. George Fox.
Raphe Allyn. John Done. George Laykin.
W™ Burbiq^e. John Fox. Nicholas Smith.
XXYIU.
TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
Thomas Lakyn.
Robert Blood.
Raphe Onyoa.
John Wilcox.
Robert Baron.
George Wolderidge.
John Topham.
Thomas Hewer.
John Greene.
Thomas Webb.
W» Browne.
Hugo Hardinge.
Richard Smith.
John Ashemore.
Raphe Gibbons.
Robert Wilkinson.
Thomas Browne.
John Hunt.
Hughe Robinson.
Henry Vnderhill.
Richard Allen.
Thorn* Bailey.
W» Falconer.
John Allen.
WiH"" Darlaston.
Richard Bowelworth
James Alcock.
W" Pigott.
Will" Bott.
Richard Johnson.
Will" Key.
John Hall.
Michaell Browne.
Henry Bailey.
Rob^ Adams.
W« Peate.
Thorn* Newth.
Richard Mogge.
Steeven Reynolds.
Robert Carter.
Hnmfrey Dalton.
Richard Wright.
John Tirer.
WiU» Ashbome.
Thom» Heath.
Richard Ensor.
Thomas Kagington.
Thomas Robinson.
Note 18, page 144.
W«Peares.
John Wright.
Henrie Sketchley.
Thomas Cooper.
William Tailo^
Randall Chadbome.
Thomas Key.
Raphe Plott.
James Birde.
William Archer.
John Symons.
W« Slater.
Thomas Preist.
Robert JeayugB.
Henry Osborne.
Hughe Latimer.
Josephe Radford.
Henrie Alcott
John Woodcock.
William Kedes.
George Browne.
X'fer HartiU.
John Allen.
Thomas Winfeild. "
A COPY OF THE SURRENDER OF THE
CHARTER.
From the CvrporaUtm ReevrdB.
"To all [to] whom these presents shall come. we» the Baylifls
and Com'onality of the towne & Burrongh of Tamworth, in the
Counties of Warr ' and Staff', send greeting. Know ye that con-
sidering how much it imports the Govemm^ of the said Towne
and Burrough to haue p'sons of known Loyalty and approved
integrity to beare offices of Majestracy and places of trust there-
in, We, the said Bayliffs and Com'onality, have graunted and
yielded up, and by these p'sents doe graunt^ surrender, and yeild
up unto his most gratious Ma^*, James the second, by the grace
of God, of England, Scotland, France, & Ireland, King, his heirs
and successors, all and singular the powers, franchises, Liberties,
Privileges, and aucthorities whatsoeuer and howsoeuer graunted or
to be vsed or exercised by us, the said Bayliffs and Com'onality*
by virtue of any right, title, or interest, vested in or by any
Charter, letters patents, custom, or prescription, in • . . of, or
concerning the electing, nominating, constituting, being, or
ABPBNDIX.
XXIX.
appoynting of any p'son or p'sona into or for the seaerall & res-
pectioe offices of 6aylifis, High Steward, Recorder, Proth'notarj
or Town .Clarke, and Capital! Burgesses of the said Towne &
Borrongh. And wee, the said Bayliffs & Com'onality, doe herehy
humhly heseich his ma^* to accept of this our surrender, and doe
with all suhmission to his ma*^" good pleasure, implore his grace
and favour to Regrant to ts, the said Baylifis & Com'onalty, the
nameing and chusing of the said officers, and the said liberties
and priviledges, or soe many of them and in such manner as his
ma^, in his grace and wisdome, shall judg most conducing to the
good of the said Towne and Burrough, and with and vnder such
reserrasons, restrictions, and qnalificasons, as his ma^ shall
please to appoynt. for witness whereof, we, the said Baylifis and
Com'onalty haue hereunto fixed our com'on scale, the xzvij^ day
of Aprill, in the fourth yeare of the raigne of our soveraigne Lord»
James the second, by the grace of God, of £<ngland, Scotland,
France, & Ireland, lung, defender of the faith, &c., Annoq' d'ni
1688."
Note 19, page 152.
An account of the subscriptions raised in the parish
worth, in aid of the supplies granted to his Majesty
defence of the nation, in Uie year 1798.
ofTam-
for the
TAMWORTH.
T. Holmes, esq., bailiff
C. Oaket, esq. , town-derk
JohnWillington, eiq.
John Meacham, esq.
Messrs. Paget & Corgan
Thomas Holmes, jnn. . .
J. Humbenton, M.D. . .
J. Harding
Joshna Brown . •
Mrs. Brown
Ann Brown
Senrants at King's Arms
WiUiamsRice ..
Miss Robinson ..
Josiah Marshall
William Marshall
Daniel Harper . .
C. G. Harper . .
Gilbert Bradgate
Mrs. Bradgate . .
Mrs. Latham
Mrs. Bale
Senrants ..
William Bindley
Mrs. A. and M. Bindley
10
21
5
3
21
5 5 0
10 10
21 0
0
0
5
3
0
10 10
1 1
0 5
0 6
10 10
0 10 6
3 3 0
2
5
5
2
1
1
2
2
5
5
A. Bindley, jnn.
Thomas Bindley
Mrs. E. Bindley
W. Bindley jnn. & Sisters
Edward Jones • • • .
Thomas Webb . . • •
Francis Woodcock
Richard Nerill . .
Thomas Arnold
Miss Dawes
William Parsons, sen. . .
William Parsons, jon. . .
Robert Panton
Edward Thorman
Samuel Tylecote • .
Walter Lyon
Beiqamin Shelton • •
Mrs. Crowley . .
Miss Wright ..
Mrs. Vincent ..
Miss Gresley . .
Miss Parr
Servant of Mrs. Vincent
Mrs. Wilson
Miss Wilson
Miss March . •
£.9. d,
0 10 6
2 2
2
1
3
3
5
2 2
1 1
5 5
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
10 10
5 5
10 10
5 5
5 5
10 0
1 1
0 10 6
10 10 0
10 10 0
1 1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
XXX.
TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
£.
t.
d.
£.:
4L
BCIuPwry
h
5
0
Thomas Britain
0 5
Birs. W. Brown
h
5
0
George Basset ..
0 5
William Green ..
1
1
0
Walter Thompson
0 5
Charles MasgreaTea
0 10
6
Edward Brant ..
0 5
Mrs. Dawea
s
2
0
William Johnaon
0 S
Mn.Matfaewa ..
0 10
6
Thomaa Walthew
0 5
Riehaitl Peten
5
5
0
Thomaa Walthew, carrier
0 10
MiasStoier and Slater..
10
10
0
John Tomlinaon
1 1
Pickard and Capenhnrtt
15
15
0
James Eades
0 5
Elisabeth Jones
, ,
1
0
Joseph Temple ..
Ridmrd Hidme
0 10
Other senranta of
Bfr.
0 2
Pickard
0
0
ThomasFsine ..
0 5
Ridiard Froeman
2
0
Samnel Freeman
0 10
JohnNewbold ..
2
0
William Vincent
0 10
Richard Bird ..
2
0
Mra. Bnckerfield
0 10
Mra. Chamberlain
3
0
John Wooton • .
0 7
Joteph Keeling..
2
0
Henry Fldders..
0 5
Jamea Keeling ..
1
0
John Waring ..
1 1
John Moore
3
0
SethWard
0 2
R. W., shoemaker
0
0
Samnel HaU ..
0 5
John Batler ..
1
0
John Bailey
0 10
William Mooie..
1
0
Thomas Marshall
0 10
Ann Bnggins
0
0
Joseph Knight ..
1 1
Mr. J. Harding's serranta
0
0
Samnel Aduna ..
1 1
Peter Harding ..
1
0
Joseph Vincent..
0 10
Robert Proctor ..
1
0
Thomas Fenton..
0 10
Thomas Coton ..
0 10
6
William Clarke..
0 5
Alexander Harding
0
5
0
Thomas Campion
0 5
John Rawlins ..
0
5
0
Robert Birch ..
0 5
Thomas HiU ..
0
5
0
John Marriott ..
1 1
Robert Kirby ..
0
5
0
William Hunter
1 1
William Norton, jnn.
0
5
0
John HaU
2 2
Other work-people
of
WILNSCOTB.
the printing worki
1 of
Josiah Marshall
, ,
5 5
Messrs. Peel and Co.
3
3
0
Mra. Marshall ..
, ,
2 2
Robert NetiU ..
1
1
0
Mr. MarshaU's aerranta
0 2
Jeremiah Ackeroyd
0
5
0
Je£fry Paul
Mr. PauVs servants
5 5
Richard Baker ..
1
1
0
0 2
Ann Baker
0
5
0
Thomas Fidgeon
5 5
Isaac Hare
1
1
0
William Coton . .
1 1
Mons. Hamel . .
0 10
6
Miss Wright ..
5 5
Thomas Jones ..
0
5
0
Miss Wright's senrante
0 5
Samuel Whitehoose
3
3
0
Thomas Garratt
0 10
William SadUer..
0 10
6
Thomas Snape . .
0 10
Richard Bennet..
1
1
0
Mr. Moggs
1 1
Mrs. Hewitt
0
5
0
ObadMilles
0 5
— Wilkinson ..
0
2
6
Samuel Spooner
0 5
Thomas Endsor, jnn.
0
5
0
Charles Handley
0 5
Richard Fielders
0
5
0
Mrs. Poultney . .
0 10
Thomas Chatterton
0
2
6
Thomas Basset..
0 1
John and Thomas Patrick
0
5
0
Thomas Birch . .
0 0
Mrs. Eleanor Rice
, ,
2
0
0
William Spirea ..
0 1
Thomas Wallis..
, ,
2
2
0
William Martin
0 2
William BenUey
• •
1
1
0
Collected at the Chapel
0 10
6
APPBNDIX.
XXXI.
VAXBUBT AMD BOMBHILL.
£. #.
J.
Bev. FrancU BHck
• •
5 5
0
Tbe youDg gentlemen eda-
cated under the
rey.
F.BUck
, ,
12 5
6
Servants to Mr. BUck ..
0 10
0
John Pipe
5 5
0
Thomas Alsager
1 1
0
Henry Wright ..
1 1
0
John Kendall ..
3 3
0
John Buttock . .
0 10
6
William Webster
0 10
6
Joseph Wilcox ..
1 1
0
Thomas Birch ..
0 2
6
James Weston ..
0 2
0
Richard Sadiier
0 1
0
Thomas Lago .•
0 5
0
Samuel Yeomans
1 1
0
John Gloyer
0 10
6
T. B. Paget, esq.
, ,
10 10
0
J. HastQow, servant to do.
0 2
0
William Paul ..
, ,
10 10
0
Richard Bamford
, ,
3 3
0
Thomas Padmore
, ,
1 1
0
AMINGTON.
C. E. Repington, esq. . . 40 0 0
William Seal .. ..550
John Freeman . .
WiUiam Hall ..
Thomas Endsor..
Thomas Ordish . .
William Key . .
John Pratt
William Marriott
Samuel Daulman
£, t. d.
1 1
0 2
0
6
0
0
6
0 2 6
0 10 6
0 10 6
HOPWASy COTON, WIOOINTOK, &C.
John Roe .. .. 2 2 0
Peter Birch .. .. 110
Humphry Woodcock . . 5 5 0
Miss C. Jervis . . . . 3 3 0
Miss Knight . . 0 10 6
EUzabeth Riley.. .. 0 10 6
Elizabeth Jackson ..050
Elizabeth Cox .. ..010
Robert Arnold .. 110
Elizabeth Glorer .. 0 10 6
Richard Long .. .,026
James Pipe 110
Ralph Marlow .. 0 10
Thomas Proudman .. 0 10 6
George Hobday, sen. . . 110
John Russett 5 0
James Haskew . . . . 0 10 6
John Haskew . . 0 2 6
Collected at the Church
doors on the £ut-day 27 0 4)
Note 20, page 156.
OFFICERS UNDER THE NEW FORM OF
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT.
MAYORS.
1836 Jan. 1. Robert NeviU.
1836 Not. 9. Joseph Knigbt.
1837 Not. 9. William Parsons, sen.
1838 Nov. 9. William Parsons, jnn.
1839 Not. 9. John Hall.
1840 Not. 9. Thomas Bnckerfield.
1841 Not. 9. WiUiam Robinson.
1842 Not. 9. Thomas Arnold.
1843 Not. 9. Thomas Bramall.
1844 Not. 9. Thomas Bramall.
ALDERHEN.
1835 Dec. 31. William Parsons, sen. ; Joseph Knight ; John
Hall; Thomas Bnckerfield.
XXXII. TAKWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
1838 June 22. Robert Nerill in the room of Joseph Knight,
deceased.
1838 Not. 9. William Parsons, sen.; Robert NeriU; John
Hall ; William Parsons, jun.
1841 Nov. 9. William Pknons, sen.; Robert Nevill; John
Hall ; William Parsons, jun.
1844 Feb. 19. Thomas Backerfield in the room of William
Parsons, sen., deceased.
1844 Nov. 9. Robert Nevill, John Hall, ^^Hlliam Pkrsons.
Tliomas Backerfield.
C0UNCILL0B8.
1835 Dec. 26. William Parsons, jun.; John HaU; Joseph
Knight ; John Butler ; Richard Bennet ; Richard
Bird, jun. ; Robert Kirkman Fallows; Robert
Nevill ; Tliomas Arnold ; Thomas Budcerfield ;
Francis Hunter ; Robert Fowler.
1836 Jan. 9. Samuel Hanson, W. Flatts, William Henry
Wain, in the room of Alderman HaU, Knight,
and Backerfield.
1837 Nov. !• William Pfeursons, jun. ; Samuel Hanson ; WOliam
PktU ; John Butler ; Richard Bennett ; Richaid
Bird, jun. ; Robert Kirkman Fallows ; Robert
Nevill ; T. Arnold ; W. H. Warn ; Francis Hunter;
Richard Barratt.
1888 Nov. 1. Samuel Hanson ; William Flatts ; JohnBotler;
Richard Bird, jun. ; William Robinson ; Thomas
Arnold ; William Henry Wain ; Francis Hunter,
Richard Barratt; Robert Fowler; Thomas Bram-
all : R. K. Fallows.
1839 Nov. 1. Samuel Hanson; William Platts ; John Butler;
Richard Bird ; William Robinson ; William
Henry Wain ; Fhmcis Hunter ; Richard Bar-
ratt ; Robert Fowler ; Thomas BramaU ; Robert
Kirkman Fallows; William Rnfie.
1840 Nov. a. Samuel Hanson ; WOliam Platts ; John Butler;
William Robinson ; William Henry Wain ;
Francis Hunter ; Richard Barratt ; Thomas
Bramall ; William Rufie ; Thomas Arnold ;
Thomas Backerfield ; Joseph Gray.
1841 Nov. 1. William Platts; William Robinson; William
Henry Wain; Fronds Hunter; Richard Bar-
ratt ; Thomas Bramall ; William Rufie ; Thomas
Arnold ; Thomas Buckerfield ; Joseph Gray ;
Etienne Bruno Hamel ; Samuel Woodcock.
1842 Nov. 1. William Platts; William Robinson; Fhmds
APPENDIX. XXXIU.
1842 Nov. 1. Hanter; Thomas Bramall ; Thomas Arnold;
(e<Mtmued.J Thomas Buckerfield ; Joseph Graj ; Etienne
Brono Hamel ; Samuel Woodcock ; Felix John
Hamel ; Thomas Brooke Bridg;es Stevens ;
James Dufiy.
1843 Nov. 1. William Platts; William Robinson; Francis
Hanter; Thomas Bramall; Thomas Arnold;
Thomas Backerfield ; Joseph Graj ; Etienne
Bruno Hamel ; Samuel Woodcock ; Felix John
Hamel ; Thomas Brooke Bridges Stevens ;
James Dufiy.
1 844 Feb. 23. Robert Cave Browne, in the room of Alderman
Backerfield.
1844 Nov. 1. William Platts; William Robinson; Francis
Hunter ; Thomas Bramall ; Thomas Arnold ;
Robert Cave Browne ; Joseph Gray ; Etienne
Bruno Hamel ; Samuel Woodcock ; Felix John
Hamel; Thomas Brooke Bridges Stevens;
James Dufiy.
1845 Mar. 20. Jonathan Thompson, in the room of James
Dnfiy, deceased.
AUDITORS.
1836 Mar. 1. Thomas Wainwright, Samuel Watton.
1837 Mar. 1. Thomas Wainwright, Samuel Watton.
1838 Mar. 1. William Weston, Edmund Eaton.
1839 Mar. I. William Weston, Edmund Eaton.
1840 Mar. 2. Edmund Eaton, William Roe.
1841 Mar. I. William Roe, George Flint.
1842 Mar. I. George Flint, Edmund Ebton.
1843 Mar. 1. George Flint, Edmund Eaton.
1844 Mar. 1. George Flint, Edmund Eaton.
1845 Mar. 1. George Flint, Edmund Eaton.
ASSESSORS.
1836 Mar. 1. Joseph Keeling, WDliam Weston.
1837 Mar. 1. Joseph Keeling, William Weston.
1838 Mar. 1. Joseph Keding, David Arnold.
1839 Mar. 1. Joseph Keeling, David Arnold.
1840 Mar. 2. David Arnold, John Riley.
1841 Mar. 1. David Arnold, George Flint.
1842 Mar. 1. David Arnold, James Wallis.
1843 Mar. 1. David Arnold, James Wallis.
1844 Mar. 1. David Arnold, James Wallis.
1845 Mar. 1. David Arnold, James Wallis.
XXXIY. TAMWOBTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
DSPUTT AS8B880S8.
1838 George Flint, Joseph Arnold.
1839 George Flint. Joseph Arnold.
1 840 Joseph Arnold, John Shilton.
1841 Joseph Arnold, Richard Bennett.
1842 Joseph Arnold. Richard Bennett.
1843 Joseph Arnold, Samnel Mottrsm.
1844 Joseph Arnold, Samoel Mottram.
1845 Joseph Arnold, Samuel Mottram.
TOWN CLBBK.
1836 Francis WOUngton.
TUBASURBBS.
Etienne Bruno Hamei, from the 15th of Jan. 1836, to Nov.
1841, when he was dected a member of the cooncil, and
William Bindley was ^ypointed Treasurer.
Note 21, page 217.
Hugh de Babbington is mentioned in the Court-rolls of the
town, on the Stafibrdshire side; where a suit oocars between
him and John le Bloond de Lichfield, in 1312.
May 14.
Hngo de Babinton, Decanns Eoc'e de Tliamworth, invenit
pleg', vider WUl'm le Saltere & Will'm Mathen. ad pV ▼* Joh'm le
Blound de Lychfeld, Capl'm, in p'to debiti.
Hugo de Babinton, Decan' Eoc'e de Thamworth, q' ▼' Joh'em
le Bloand de Lychfeld. Capell'm, de pl'o debiti, p' Will'm atte
cros, p mo.
Jane 4.
Joh' le Blond de Xychefeld n* Hngonem de Babynton,
Decanmn Ecd'e Beate Edithe de Tamworth, de pl'to debiti, p'
Rob't'm de Brewode, j® : qui quid' Hugo, per Will' ad Cmoem,
attorn' sua', op' se u' p'd'c'm Joh', qui h' ^m.
June 25.
Joh'nes le Bloand de lych', capell*, def ' n' Hug' de Babington.
decanu' ecc'e de Tameworth, de pl'o deb'i, p' Joh* Hendema', ^,
Et d'c's Hag' p'sens op' se, & h't die'.
July 16.
Joh'es Blound de Lichfdd, capell'. def' n' Hugon' de Bab-
inton, decan' ecc'e de Tamworth. de pl'o debiti. p' Joh'm le Bloand
de Tamworth. iij«.
August 6.
Joh'es Blounde de Lychfdd. Capell'. defend' p' attomatu' sua'
v' Hugon' de Babmton. Tamworth. de pl'o
debiti, et p'd'tus Hugo, p' attomatu' sua*, et Joh'es h't diem
Tsq' ad p'z'm in Esson'.
APPENDIX. XXXY.
August 27.
Joh'es Bloond de Lycbfeld et Hogo de Babinton concordat!
sunt : et p'dVs Hugo ponit se in m'ia : pV de m'ia, Will' le Salt'e.
Note 22, page 218.
Many writen, especially Erdeswick and Shaw, have given mnch
concerning the family, whose surname was derived from Hopwas.
Perhaps the following particulars, taken from the Court-rolls of
Tamworth, may prove of interest to antiquaries.
Alanus filius G. de hop' is named 14 Edw. I.
Nov. 17, 20 Edw. I :— Will's Matheu dat Ric', suo nepoti,
t'dam p't* vni' Burg' in feodo in Com' Stafiurd, & Matill' fil' Alicie
de Hopwas, q'rta' p'tem vni' burg* in Comit' Warwykye.
May 23, 23 Edw. I :— Johannes de Hopwas.
July 28, 3 Edw. II :— Staff. Tastatores present' Ric's de
Hopwas, p' prava s'nica [cerevisia].
June 12, 3 Edw. II : — Ricardus filius Roberti de Hopwas.
Nov. 6, 6 Edw. II :-*It' p' hu' leuatu' int' Ric' de Hopewas
& Leticia', sororem suam, & Juliana de Hopewas, ad injuria' p'd'ti
Ric' Id'o &c.
June 8, 6 Edw. II: — Ric' de Hopwas in m', q' maledizit
francipleg', in contemptu Cur' : pleg' w eel. Junior.
Sept. 30, 8 Edw. II :— Willielmns de Hopwas.
Nov. 10, 12 Edw. II:— Rog' le Coup'e traxit Will' fil' Job'
de Hopewas iniuste. I'o in misericordia.
Aug. 4, 20 Edw. II :— WiU's Herb't no' est p's q'rel' sua' u'
Letidam de Hopewas* Id'o ip'e & pleg' suu' in m'ia, et Letic'
sine die.
Octob., 3 Edw. Ill:— Ric' de Hopewas facit Oleu' iux'
vici*os suos, ad abominado'm & nocumentu' toti' vicinitat'. Et p'p'
hoc p'hibet' s'b dj' marc' q' amplius no' tenet' ibi tale domu' &c.
ad tale op'.
March, 8 Edw. Ill : — Hugo de Hopewas.
Octpb. 7, 10 Edw. Ill : — ^Agnes de Hopewas.
Sept. 30, 16 Edw. Ill : — ^Alanus filius Alani de Hopwas.
Octob. 13, 28 Edw. Ill :— m'ia ij» It' pr' q'd Will's xij'* s'uiens
Hugonis de Hopewas, & Joh'es de Hopewas (xij^) t'xeru't sang'
de Joh'e Juwet, [etc.]
July 9, 43 Edw. Ill :— Sciant &c q'd nos, Joh'es de Hopewas
& Christiana vxor mea, dedimus, &c.,01iuero Clede de Tamworth,
capell'o, her' & assign' suis, vnu' messuag, cu' om'ib' p'tin' suis in
Tamworth, in Com' Stafford', p'ut iacet in Otewalestrete [etc.]
May 22, 2 Rich. 11. Thomas filius Johannis de Hopewas.
Octob. 26, 13 Rich. II. John de Hopewas was one of the jury
of the leet.
Jan. 16, 14 Rich. II :^Joh' de Hopewas & C'tiana uxor eius.
XXXVl. TAMWO&TH CASTLB AND TOWN-
March 2, 16 Rich. II : — Radalphns de Hopewas.
May 1, 3 Hen. VI :^WiUielmii8 Hopewas.
May 11, 29 Hen. VI :*-TaiUtore8 pm' ij^. Nich'
us Hopewas* p' obstup' j foesat' ap^ Walleforlong.
Jan. 17, 30 Hen. VI :— Ad istam Cur*, venit Rad'ns hope-
was & fee' fine' cu' Ball'b p' inqoisico'e h'end' qois est p'x' heres
Ric'o Sampson & Joh'e fitio dos : & dicit q'd Ric'aa Sampson &
Ric' Dawte descend' de doabns sororibQS,&dict' Ric'& Joh'es obier'
sine hered' : & de diet' Ric'o Dawte descend' Alio' fil' eins, &
nupt' fait Joh'i Hopewas, & de p'dict Alic' descend' Rad'o hope-
was, modo pet' &c., per sacr'm Ric'i Dalton, Homfr' Jaccbe,
Nich'i Smyth, Henr' Conper. Joh'is I^ynce, Thome Mathew,
Joh'es Rote, Thome Jaet, Ric'i Rageley, Joh'is Starky, Job' Bel-
grave, & Job' Gefirey, & Job' Joyner, inrat' sop' sacr'm sau' quod
Radulpbns Hopewas est p'x' heres Ricardi Sampson.
Henricus, dei gra' Rex Anglic & Francie, & IXos Hib'n',
Balliais suis de Tamworth salotem. Precipim' vob' q'd inste & sine
dil'one & s'c'd'm consnetudinem maneri] de Tamworth, plenum rec^
turn teneatis Rad'o Hopewas de vno mesoagio cum p'tin' in
Tamworth, quod Joh'es Bate d'icus, Ric'us Goldeson, & Ric'os
Erne ei deforc'. Ne ampl' inde dam' and' p' deftu'recti. T* me
ip'o apud Westm., xxriij die Nouembr., Anno r.n. tricesimo.
Feb. 6. 30 Hen. VI : — Rad'ns hopewas. qui tulit breue d'ni Reg'
p'uu' v's' Job' Bate, cl'icum, Ric'm Goldesone, & Ric'm Erne, in
pladto terre, mortuuus est.
Feb. 27, 30 Hen. VI : — Henricus, dei grsada Rex Pre-
cipimus vobisquod plenum rectum teneatis Will' o fil' Rad'i
hopewas de vno mesuagio cum p'tin' in Tamworth quod Joh'es
Bate d'icus. Will's Neweport Armig', Ric'us Goldeson, & Ric'us
Eme ei'defore'. Ne ampl' inde clam' and' p' deftu'recti. T* me
jp'o apud Westm', xxv) die Januarij, Anno r. n. tricesimo.
October, 30 Hen. VI : — Nicholaus hopewas.
Note 23, page 223.
"To all men, to whom this p'sent wrytyng trip'tyd indentyd
scbal] Come, Dame Dorothe Ferrers, widow, late the wyfife of S'
John Ferrers, knyght, sendith gretyngin our lA>rd god £u'la8t3rng.
Whereas I, the seyd Dorothe, By my Dede indentyd datyd the
xx^ day of octobr in the xxij yere of y* Reign of our sou'eign
Lord, kyng Henry y* viij, haue enfeofled WUl'm Repyngton of
lytyll Amyngton, Gent., fraunces repyngton, his son and heire
apparant, John Jeks of Tamworth, in the countie of Warr., Gen-
tilma', Richard Jeks, his son And heire apparant, Thomas
wodshaw of tamworth aforseyd, chapma', John wodshaw, his
son and heire apparant, Thomas Golson of Tamworth, yema',
homfrey Golson, bis son and heire apparant, Richard Coton of
APPENDIX. XXXVU.
Coton, yema', John coton, his son and heire apparent, nycholas
Golson of Dntyton basset, yema', John Golson, his son and heire
apparent, John Darlaston of wigginton, John Darlaston, his son
and heire apparant, Nycholas melbom late of Wigginton, yeman,
John melliam, his son and heire apparant, their heires And
assignes, of and in eon Burgage in tamworth aforeeid, lying in
the stret caUed le Batcher, And extendith in bred'e betwixt the
burgage of humfrey Ferren, esqnier, my son and here, on the on
p'te. And the Burgage of John Jeks on the other p'tie, and
eztentheth in lengthe from the kyng's bye way to the Grounde of
the Vicare of the colege of saynt E^th of tamworth, Wich I, the
seyd Dame Dorothe, late p'chesed of on Richard Bowris of North-
ampton ; And of all other my lands and ten'ts, medowes, lesees,
pastur'. And other hereditaments, w^ thdr Appurten'nces, lying
& beyng in The fee of Wiggynton, In the Countie of staff., wich
I, the seyd Dame Dorothe, lately purchesed of oon Raffe lago to
the vse of me, tiie seyd Dame Dorothe, and for the p'formance of
my last will, know tx that my full mynde, will, and intent is
that My seyd fefiees, their heire and assignes for eu', schall snffbr
the balties of the toon of tamworth aforeseyd And their successore,
for the tyme beyng, yerely to receyue and take all the rents,
issues, and p'fits, comyng And Growyng out or by reson of the
eeyd burgage, land, and ten'ts. And other the p'misses for eu', to
the uses and intents hereaft' ensuyng : that is to sey, I will tiiat
the same baillies And their successore, for the tyme beyng, schall
for eu' the x} day of the Monyth of July, cause a obbit to be kept
in the church of seynt Edith in tamworth aforseyd, with all the
hool quere there. And to haue a solemn dirig to be song in the
evenyng of the same day. And masse of requiem on the next
morow, then specially to prey for the soule of the said Sr. John
Ferren my late husband, and the soule of me, the seyd Dame
Dorothe, the soules of willm. harp' esquier and margaret his
wiff my fiftther & mother, and all Cristen soules. And I will
y^ eu'y of the vicare seruyng in the seyd church And beyng at
y* seyd Dirge and se3ring mass on the morow for the soules
Aforenamed, have, for his labur, iTjd. It'm, to eu'y of the too
Decons in the seyd church, iijd. It'm, for ryngyng of the too
Cnylls, viijd. It'm, for the hyre of iiij tapure to bren about the
herse, in the tyme of the seyd servis, viijd. It'm, to the belman
of tamworth aforseyd, for the tyme Beyng, ijd. It'm, to be
dely'd the seyd tyme yerly to pooer people dwellyng in the seyd
toun of Tamworth att ther houses, by the discresion of the seyd
baillies, for y* tyme Beyng, iTJs. viijd. It'm, my mynd is that
Eu'y on of the iiij baillies of tamworth Aforeeyd schall offer,
Eu'y on of them, a ob' at the seyd masse of requiem ; and Eu'y
on of them to tske iiij for ther labur in executyng this my Will
XXXVUl. TAMWOBTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
of suche money as they achaU receyue of the rents of the seyd
Bnrgag and other the p'miaes. It*m, I will y^ they vican of tiie
seyd church, for the tyme heyng, eehall yerely have Tiijd. to pn^
for the aooles aforeaeyd in their hedroll. It'm, I will y^ the aeyd
bailies of Tamworth And ther aacoesaors, for the tyme Beyng,
achall yerely pay vn to the Grey frerya stt lychleld iija. iiijd., aoo
that y * same frerya for en', the aeyd xj day of the monyth of Joly,
ayng dirig bv nite in the Monaat'y, And maaae of Reqoiem the
next moroo toloyng, apecialy for my aeyd hnaband'a aonle. And
Myne, and for Uie aooles of the aeyd will'm harp' and Mazg'et
hia wiff my father & mother, & aJl Gristen aoolea. And en'y
frere in the aaid houae there, beyng preeat, to aey, the aame Day
or dla one day in the aame Weke, oon maaae of requiem for the
aoulea aforereheraed. It'm, I will in lyke wise that the frerya att
Aderaton achall yerely have ija. to ayng dirige. And maaae of
requiem in ther monast'y, the aeyd Deys, for Uie aoolea of the
p'aona afomamed. and farther, I will Uiat yff ther be iij or iiij
aonll preeata, wich achall for fortune to a've in the aeyd church
of Tamworth att anch tyme aa the aeyd yer' mynd or obit achal-
be kept, then I will en'y of them bane iiijd., aoo that they sey
dirige and maaae of requiem the aeyd tyma, for the aoolea aforre-
heraed. And my fa'ther will and mynd ia y', aft' all thea
paymenta and chaga in forme aforaeyd be payd borne and
also aU eheif renta and other yerely chargea and suites hereaft'
Goyng out or to be due by reaon of the aeyd Bnrgag, lands,
t'enta. And other the p'misaea, be truly Content and payd, then
the reaydne of the money, wich schalbe Beceyued and taken of
the renta, iaauea, & p'fita, Commyng or growyng of, or by reson
of, the seyd burgage, lands, ten'ts. And other the p'misses to be
put in a Box lodiyd, whereof the seyd Baylliea to kepe the key,
and then to be dely'ved to suche a preist in the seyd churche of
tamworth, which is comjmly called seint Georg's preiste, for the
tyme Beyng, and he safly to kepe the same, to thenteut that the
aeyd Money, wich soo remaynyth schall maynteyn, beer, and kepe
all man' of repparracons and other chai^, wich schalbe nesaesaary
or ought to Be Doon upon or by reson of the p'misses or eny
p'cell theroff.
D. F.
Note 24, page 238.
Since we wrote the History of the Church, a clerical change
has taken place. Early in the present year, the rev. R. C.
Savage was presented by the Queen to the vicarage of Nuneaton,
in Warwickshire ; and he has in consequence resigned this living.
Captain it Court has subsequently appointed the rev. E. Haraton,
M. A., both as vicar and perpetual curate of the Church.
APPENDIX. XXXIX.
NAMES OF CHURCHWARDENS.
From the Court Rotti, PaHMh Begitter, ^.
1455 John Fletcher.
1456 John Goldson, John GeSrey. (Oct. 26.)
1470 Peter Goabout, John Woodshaw. (Oct. 23.)
1488 Richard Woodshaw, William Green. (Nov.)
1505 Richard Breton, John Irp. (Oct. 21.)
1507 Richard Breton, Thomas Goldson. (Nov.)
1508 John Gillot, Nicholas Symond. (Oct.)
1509 John Jekes, John Irp. (Oct. 15.)
1511 Richard Breton, Richard Coton. (Not.)
1598 William Wightwick, Nicholas Vanghton.
1599 Robert Lysatt, Edward Taylor.
1600 Ralph Dawman, Christopher Wilcox.
1601 Robert Gratwick, Henry Hall.
1602 Richard Cheatle, Thomas Vanghton.
1603 George Onion, John Vanghton.
1 604 John Keeling, Thomas Allen.
1605 John Hall, Richard Scale.
1606 Clement Joell, Richard Onion.
1607 Rowland Frances, Henry Hill.
1 608 Thomas Massy, Henry Wilcox.
1609 Ambrose Hood, John Wright.
1610 Richard Fletcher, William Farmer.
1611 John Oldrich, Erasmus Mousley.
1612 John Sharp, John Vale.
1613 Hugh Gierke, William Elliott.
1614 Richard Wright, William Earp.
1615 Adam Tnrton, Richard Wright.
1616 John Scale, Richard Lattimer.
1617 John Bache, Christopher Harthill.
1618 John Nicholson, Richard Harding.
1619 Edward Willington, Christopher Wilcox.
1620 Thomas Kebb, Richard Mousley.
1628 W. Smith, J. Ellis.
1635 George Orton, Francis Freeman.
1660 Walter Ashmore, John Osbom.
1661 Gerard Wagstaff, Comdius Osbom.
1 662 Thomas Jones, John Sutton.
1663 Thomas Carter, John Dawes.
1664 Gilbert Jordan, John Vanghton.
1665 Francis Wood, John Bankes.
1666 Robert Peake, Edward Smith.
1667 Edward Smith.
1 668 John Clifton, Thomas Batman*
xl. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
1669 WiDiam WUcoz, Jotiali Newey.
1670 Thomas Talbut, William Michell.
1 67 1 Thomas Pratt, Richard Hair.
1 672 Joseph Kej, Joseph Batman.
1673 William Cawne, WHliam Harding.
1674 Francis Wright. William Wikoz.
1 676 Morgan Powell, Robert Green.
1677 Charles Baynton, Edmand Chamberlain.
1678 William Ashley, Isaac Orton.
1 679 Edward Drayton, William Hazeldine.
1 680 Thomas Roades, Joseph Radford.
1681 John Vamham, Rob^ Cawne.
1682 Samuel Orton, George Wright.
1683 Daniel Jordan, David Read.
1684 Edward Symonds, Ridiard Weaman.
1685 Samad Bnckland.
1686 John Vangbton, Francis Wood.
1 687 Thomas Talbnt, Thomas Wagstaff.
1688 William Harding.
1690 William Harding, Charles Ptoicer.
1692 George Wagstaff.
1693 Edwvd Bradgate, John Bankes.
1694 Richard Weaman, Joseph Batman.
1695 Samuel Orton, John Dawes.
1702 George Hood, Joseph Wilcox.
1703 Thomas Homer, John Harthill.
1710 John Vangbton sen., John Uby.
1726 Beilby Laycock, Thomas Vangbton.
1728 William Pickard, John Lattimer.
1730 Joseph Hood, Abraham Waterson.
1 759 John Vangbton, James Dawes.
1 760 Thomas meman, Nathaniel Crosland.
1761 John Kendal, John Waterson.
1762 John Kendal, William Bishop.
1763 John Kendal, William Bishop.
1764 Nathaniel Crosland, William Bishop.
1765 Nathaniel Croslahd, Walter Howe.
1766 Thomas Nicbolls, Walter Howe.
1 767 John Blood, Samuel Ball.
1 768 George Godfrey, William Weston.
1769 George Godfrey, Job Hunter.
1770 Joseph Heath, Job Hunter, They continued
until 1773.
1 773 Edward Panton, WilHam Dyall.
1 774 Edward Panton, WilUam DyaU.
1775 John Bindley, Henry Watterson.
APPENDIX. xli.
1776 George Godfrey, Henry Watterson. Both
continaed until 1 78 L •
1781 George Godfrey, John Bindley. Both con-
tinued until 1787.
1787 George Godfrey, Joseph Heath. They con-
tinued until 1789.
1 789 George Godfrey, John Bindley.
1790 George Godfrey, John Bindley. On the 4th
of July, Thomas Shearshy was chosen, in
the place of G. Godfrey, deceased.
1791 Thomas Shearsby, Josiah Marshall.
1792 Thomas Shearsby, Josiah Marshall. On the
1 7th of December, James Yeomans was cho-
sen in place of J. Shearsby, who left the town.
1793 James Yeomans, Robert Panton. They con-
tinued until 1797.
1797 Robert Panton, Edward Thurman. They
continued until 1800.
1800 James Yeomans, Edward Thurman. They
continued until 1804.
1 804 Robert Panton, Edward Thurman. They con-
tinued until 1807.
1807 Edward Thurman, Josiah Marshall. They
continued until 1813.
1813 William Parsons, Joseph Knight.
1814 Edward Thurman, Richard Bennett. They
continued until 1819.
1819 Edward Thurman, Richard Bennett.
John Hall.
1820 Edward Thurman, John Hall. They con-
tinued until 1823.
1823 John Hall, William Parsons jun.
1824 John Hall, Thomas Marshall.
1825 Richard Peters, Thomas Marshall.
1826 Richard Barratt, Thomas Marshall. They
continued until 1829.
1829 Thomas MarshaU, Thomas Bindley.
1830 Thomas Marshall, Richard Barratt. They
continued until 1833.
1833 Thomas MarshaU, Thomas Arnold.
1834 Charles J. Berrie, Thomas Arnold.
1835 Thomas Arnold, Etienne Bruno Hamel.
1836 Thomas Arnold, Etienne Bruno Hamel.
1 837 fVands Hunter, Etienne Bruno Hamel.
1 838 Francis Hunter, Thomas Bramall. They con-
tinued until 1842.
xlii.
TAMWOBTH CA8TLB AND TOWN.
1842 John Batler, Thomas Bnunall. Tbej oon-
turned until 1844.
1844 John Butler, Etienne Bruno HameL
1 845 John Felthouse. Job Castle Righton.
Note 25, page 252.
NAMES OF THE KEEPERS OF THE LIGHTS.
Fnm the Cmrt R6Ua.
HOI.T TBliriTT
IB. V. Makt
St. Oioaoi 8r. Katv- |SJricBOi.AS
■Ellis.
Oct S3
1470
Rob.GoldMn
&6b. GoldMMI
11io.WeaTflr
T1io.Wei:f«
Not.
1488
Rob. Shepherd
Nidi. Moon
Oct. SI
1506
]Udi.OolDii
TluhToTy
lli«di.Gtaike
Not.
1607
Wm.Howfh
John am
Jiio.Lywtt
Oct
1608
Italph Smith
Rich.Alco<^
liio.8wipMa
Oct 10
1609
8tMih.Bwnow
NUSTwebstor
Nlch. Bidiop
RlduOottaa
Not.
1511
JohnMMon
Jno. Green
Oct 18
161«
nio. DttlaBton
JnoJtapinstai
The fragment of a court-roll, the date of which is gone, but appa-
rently of Uie reign of Henry VIII., gives the foUowing statement.
Roger Ashwood was elected, for the year, keeper of the light
of St. Nicholas ; and there remained in the box delivered to him 6«.
Nicholas Webster was chosen, for the year, keeper of the light
of the Holy IVinity ; and there remained in tiie box delivered to
hun, 28. 6d.
Henry Irpe was elected, for the year, keeper of the light of St.
George ; and there remained in the box delivered to him, 1 Is, 6tf.
Note 26, page 349.
Extracts relating to the lords of Tamworth-Castle, etc.,
taken from the '*Calnedarium inquisitionum post mortem sive
escaetarum."
Anno 20 E. I., no. 36.
Philippus Marmton.
Lincoln'. Scrivelbymaner'&baroniaextent'. Lincoln' measnag'
ib'm. Langeton maner' extent*.
Warr'. Middelton maner' extent*. Sutton boscus cum chacea.
Hbrbford'. Frene maner*. lastrys maner*. Bradford maner'
extent*.
Salop*. Kilpeck feod*. Purlebeck maner*. Hokelith baU*ia
forest*.
OxoN*. Ghakenden maner* extent*. Stoke Marmiun maner*.
WiooRN*. Charleton feotC.
Warr*. Dedon, Waverton Fresell, Witacre, Drakenegg, La
Lee, Fellingley,— ;/«o(fa.
Lbicbstr*. Langetoni Wanestanston maner*, Fleckney, Shake-
APPENDIX. xliii.
lesaton maner\ Snarkeston, Barton, Cnngeston, Odeston maner*,
SattoQ, Wisteneatow ecd'ia, Stanton maner' eed'ia, Shameford,
Schenesby, Aymeresthorp, Frodesworth, Monaeley, Somerdby,
'Erehwrgh,'^eoda,
Lxicestk'. Quinton maner* cum Rodbretf-^eoda.
SussBx'. Berewike maner* ecd'ia,— 3/0O(fa.
Stafford'. Tamworth eocFia cum sex prebend' in eadem & de
Yalore eanim,^eoda.
Lincoln'* Wintringham maner*, Wollingbam jozta Lincoln',
Trikingham, Stowe, Kisebye, Fooleatowe, Sutblangeton, Scrivelby
maner*, Thakewell,— /anfa.
Warr*. Pirycrofte maner*,^ Glaacote maner', Tamworthe maner*,
Anno 23 E. L, no. 55.
Joh'a de Mortbtn.
Salop*. Pulrebache maner* extent'.
Warr*. Tamworth Castr' extent'. Poleye maner*. Aachelond
4 acr* cmn piscaria in Auncre. Midddton maner* extent*.
Freseley, Overwitacre, Netherwitacre, Drakenegge,— ^eocfo.
Anno 8 £• IL, no. 45.
Maria uxor Philipfi dx Marmton.
Warr*. Midddton maner' 3 part' extent' tenetor de eccleaia
a'ce £d3rthe de Thomworth.
Lincoln*. Wilkyaby nnam croftam 36 acr' terr' 3 acr* dimid'
rod' prat' &c. Dalderby una placea terr' & 9«. 2d, reddit'. Con-
ingysby nna acr' & 3 rod* prat'.
Feoda.
Stafford'. Tomorthe prebend' in ecdesia coUegiali ib'm valens
4/. &c. Lincoln*. Wintringham & Wylingham 4 feod*. Tri-
kingham 4 part* feod*. Keaby onum feod*. Fouleatowe 2 part'
feod*. Wilkesbye tertia presentatio ecd'ise.
Anno 2 £. lU., no. 34.
Albxandbr db Frxvill.
Hbrbf*. La Feme, Bradeford,—- qnedam tenementa ib'm p
aervic* 6te p'tia j feod' apud Kilpeck castmm.
WiLTBs*. Wynterbume. Assherton maner*.
Warr*. Tameworth caatr*. Midddton maner* 3 tia p'a.
Anno 13 £. IIL,no. 14.
Joh'a uxor Albxandri db Frbyill.
Warwic'. Tamworthe castrum.
WiLTBs'. Aaaerton maner'.
1 At tUs time^ the manor of Penycroft wu hdd In caplte, by service of flndlns
ftid end Utter for the 1dng*e duonber, whenever he ahoold come to Tunwortti. The
Utter served for the royal carpet.
xliv. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
Anno 17 E. III., no. 37.
Baldbwtnus dx Frtttll.
NoRFOLc', Welyngbam maner' ext*.
Hbbxford'. Tatiodon Magna ezt'. De la Feme maner' ezt'.
Kylpeck maner'.
Wilts'. Yateabury un' toft' &c.
Wioorn'. Crowenste hamelet ezt'. Rughall maner* ext'.
Warwic'. Tamworth caatrom & terr'. Middelton maner*.
Statford'. Wygmton terr' parcell' caatri de Tamworth. Dray-
ton molend*. Tamworth terr' &c.
Anno 49 £. III., no. 57,
Baldbwinus db Frbtill ch'r.
WiLTBs'. Yateabury villa un' came' terr'.
Lincoln'. Wilaeby & Conyngeaby 14 acr' terr'.
Warwic'. Tamworth castram & maner'. Middelton maner' 4»
pars. De la Lee maner' extent'. Pathelowe, Chesterton* Wy-
shawe, Fresleye, Merston juxta Eynnesbory, Crodeshall, — terr
8c ten*. Stretford juxta Tamworth maner'. Shortley maner'.
Beandesert maner' & castrum. Henley maner'. Whitcherch
maner'. Wellesbume maner'. Mountford maner'.
Hbrbford'. Tadinton maner* extent'. Bradford maner^ ex-
tent'. Mawene maner' extent'.
Stafford'. Tamworth advoc' collegij. Wyginton terr*.
Feoda.
Warwic*. Waverton. Redbrok. Raddive. Derdon. Whit-
acre. Fresby. Pole. Dagenigge. La Lee. Odeston. Shak-
erston. Shamesford. Shenesby. Aylmerthorp, Somerdeby.
Langdon juxta Kibworth. Sparkesdon. Wistanston. Tamworth
castmm.
Anno 11 R. II., no. 27.
Baldbwinus Frtvill ch'r bt Ida uxor bjus.
Surr'. Redestone unum tenement' 56 acr' terr' et 4 acr' prati.
Wilts'. Yatesborye maner'. Cahie maner*.
WiooRN*. Beckenoure onnm messoag' una virgata terr' 10 acr'
prat'. Hambury juxta Wych sect' cur'.
Stafford'. Frerorchard gardin' & 40^ reddit* in Tamworth et
quinque prebend' in eccl'ia colleg' ib'm.
Lincoln' bt Warwic*. Wilkesby juxta Marum duo messuag'
et una virgata terr' parcell' maner' de Midelton.
Notts'. Gunthorpe et Ludham maner' ut de honore de Leicestr'.
Hbrbford'. World Ende maner' extent'. Marshmavene maner'
dimid' extent'. Bradforde maner*. Verne maner*.
Warr*. Tamworth castram extent*. Poleye maner' redditus.
Freseley 6^ redditus.
APPENDIX. Xly.
Feoda.
Warb'. Fylongley dmiid' feod\ Warton tenement'. Derdon
unnm feod'. PVeseley 3 pars feodi. Whitacre dimid' feod'.
Warton 4^ pars feodi. Drakeneche et Whitacre annin feod*.
Polley mram feod'. Hordeborg advoc' ecdesie.
I^icxsTR*. SnarkestoQ, Coningeston, Sbakston, Odeston, Bar-
ton, Sutton joxta Boseworth, Stapleton, Leyre, Wistenstowe et
Flekeney, — tria feoda. Ayimesthorpe, Shamefbrd, Froleworthe,
Sbethesby, Mooseley et Somerby, — vjitm feod'. Stanton nnom
feod'. Btnrgb nniim feod*. Radeclif cert' terr'.
Anno 2 H. lY., no. 46.
Baldbwinub Fbxytll chivalxr.
Surr', Ashstede maner* extent'.
Warr'. Tamwortb caatnim. Midddton due partes manerii.
Wiken maner' joxta Coventr'. Lee maner*. Merston maner'.
Stipersbull cm*' com warrena de. Stratford juxta Tamwortb
maner'. Sborley maner' jnxta Coventr'.
Notts'. Gontborp maner'. Loadbam maner'.
Anno 6 H. V., no. 47.
Baldbwinub Frbvill chivalxr fil' B. Frbvill chivalxr.
Warr*. Stipersbnll cor' et warenna de. Midddton tertia pars
maneni.
Lxicxstr'. Snarkeston, Ooningston, Sbakeston, Odeston, Bar-
ton, Satton joxta Boseworth, Stapdton, Ldre, Wyst^nstowe et
Flekeney, — tria feoda mUit\ Aylmestborpe, Sbamford, FroUes-
wortb, Sbetheby, Mooseley et Somerby, — icmim feod* miHt\
Boroogb onom feod' milit*. Radecliffe tertia pars nnioB feodi
militis.
Onmia sttpradicta pertinent castro de Tamworth,
WiLTXs'. Yatesbory mesa' & terr' ot de castro de Devises.
Warr'. Tamwortb castrom com membr* et feod' pertin'. Sti-
persbnll cor' & warenna. Midddton tertia pars maner'. Warton
decem messoagia com terris pratis &c. Beodesert medietas
maner*.
Anno 37 H. VI., no. 34.
Thomas Fxrrbbs armiobr.
Stafford'. Tetenbale maner' et advoc' capdlse extent'. Tam-
wortb redd' assis' 9«. ib'm. Wygynton 7 acr' terr, et 2 acr* prat'
iVm. Drayton Basset praf ib'm vocat' "Les Plekkes" et
" Rayles " i croft' ibidem vocat' " Lady Mylnebolme " alias vocaf
•• Bayle Acr' "— plac' et pastor' ibidem vocat' " J^ old Damme "
et sepand' piscar' ibidem per metas. Kynggeswood joxta Wrot-
tedey cerf terr' et pastor* ibidem vocat' " Blakdigbes."
Xlvi. TAMWORTH CASTLE AMD TOWN.
SaiiOp'* Bradford himdr' et ball'ia. Claverle maner^ extent*.
Wabr'. Tamworthcastriunetmaiier^ extent' partic' com piflcttr^
&c. Hardborg maner' et adTOc' eodi'se. StiparBhuU 3^ pars
cor', Flekenho maner'. Flekenho i feod' per dncem Norfolc'.
Wolfhamcote i feodi per Joh'em Peyto. Nethercote medietas
miitiB feod' per hered' Robert! Cany. Fylongley 3^ para me-
dietatifl uniiu feodi per hered' domini Hastynga. Dodbroke et
Wayerton 8^ pars miina feodi per hered' Walteri Cnky. Waver-
ton et Dordon 3^ para feodi per hered' Roberti Crendon. Orer-
whitacre et Fredey S^ pars dimid' feod' et 3^ pars trinm partiam
feod' per hered' Jordani de Whitacre. Waverton 3^ pars qoarts
partis onins feod' per hered' Mich'is Longdon : ac 3^ pars qointae
partis feod' ib'm per hered' Willi de Fago. Frealey 3^ pars
tertiae partis feodi per hered' Georgii de Fr^ey. Netherwhitacre
etl)raknage3ti» pars feod' per hered' E^gid'fil'Rad'i. Foley 3ti»
pars feod' per hered' Joh'is Cokayn militis.
IdicsaTK*. Smarkeston, Oomynston, Shakerston, Oddeaton,
Barton, Sutton juxta Bosseworth, Stapleton, Leyre, Wyatowe et
Flekeneye, — 3^ pars triom feod' et dimid' feod' ib'm per hered
com' Pembroc'. Elmesthorpe, Shameford, FreUesworth, Tlieth«
by, Monsley et Somerby 3^ pars feod' per hered' WiU'i Maziward.
Stanton 3^ pars feod' per hered' Rad'i Basset de Sapoote.
Raddifle 3^ pars feod' per hered' Roger! Ardem. Bnr^ 3^
para feod' per hered' Roberti Burgh. Langton juxta Kybworth
Z^ pars dimid' feod' per hered' Ivonis Langton.
Dbrb'. Walton super TVentam maner' et advoc' ecd'iae extent.
Trent piscar' in aqua.
Oxon'. Heth maner' ut de com' Gloucestr'.
Essxx'. Champeyns (in Woodham Ferrers) maner'. Bgera et
Laochelees ib'm cert' terr' et tenement' sic vocat'. Woodham
Ferrers maner'. Gyngjoyberd Laundry maner'. Woodham Fer-
rers maner'. Herewardeatok advoc' ecd'ite. Merkea (juxta
Dunmore) maner' ut de ducatu lAucastr'.
4 H. Vin. no. 1. Dorothea qub fuit uxor Johannib Fbrrsrb
MIUTIS DBFUMCn.
Assignatio dotis
Dbrb*. Walton terr' ten' et redd' et tercia p'sentacio ecd'iae.
Note 27, page 397
We here give the particulars of the estate at the time of the
sale. A few of admeasurements will be found to differ slightly
from those stated in the disposal of the property to Mr. Robins.
TilBBRTT OF THB CaBTUI.
Lot 1. The manors of Tamworth-Casde and Stipershill, with
APPENDIX. Xlvii.
Wareton, and Bolehall and Glaaoote : fiflberies of the rivera Tame
and Anker, the former, with certain parts of the banks, bdng
subject to the annual rent of 10/. then payable to the right
bon. sir Robert Peel, bart. : the residence of the Castle, with
grounds &c. of about 3a.
Lot 2. Plantation of Ir. 21p., dose of 11a. 5p., two gardens
of 3r. 34p., drying ground and two plantations of la. 2p,, close
of 7a. 3r. 19p., plantation of 2a. 2Gp,, — ^let on a lease of 21 years
from 1823, at a rent of 60/., to lieut. col. Dickenson.
Lot 3. Little Brick-kiln close of 2a. 3r. 35p., Further Thistly
field of 6a. 1^., Little Meadow of 2a. 3r. 7p., Hilly piece of 3a.
3r. 5p., Lower Bam dose North of 4a. Ir. 9p., Lower Bam close
South of 3a. 3r. 20|p., Upper Bam close SouUi of 3a. Ir. 2Qp.,
Upper Bam close North of 2a. 2r. lOp., Bam and yard of Ir. ^.,
Coal-pit close of 4a. 2r. 26p., Hilly piece of 5a. 2p„ Great Brick-
kiln close of 4a. 2r. Idp., a plantation of 20|p., Aldridge's piece of
3a. 2r. 37p., the Five Acres of 4a. 2r. 39;i., Snell's orchard of
9a. Ir. 36p., ozier-bed and land gained by the river-side of 2a.
Ir. 24p., Nether Thistley fidd of 7a. 20p ; — ^witb a farm-house
and out-buildings.
Lot 4. Pftrk-dose of 6a. 3p., bam and yards of 32/9., Bam
piece of 10a. 34p.
Lot 5. Close of 3r. 13/9. Lower and Upper Ptok-pieoes form-
ing one fidd of 3a. 3r. 38p., Close of 2a. 3r. 1^., Lower Park-
pece of 2a. 3r. I9p., Upper Park-piece of 3a. 2Sp.
Lot 6. Little Coal-pit dose of 4a. 37p., Great Coal-pit dose
of Sa. 3r. 22/i.
Lot 7. A dwdling-house, with a garden and Upper Park dose
of 3a. Ir. 35/9., Lower Park piece of 3a. 3r. 8p.
Lot 8. An Inn, with lime-kilns, stone-quarry, brick-kilns, 2
cottages and gardens, of 25a. 3r. 32p. ; and a dose of 8a. 2r. 7p.
Lot 9. Ozier-bed of 3r. 1^., Alport's holme of la. 2r.,
Park meadow of 5a. 3Qp., lower Park meadow of 4a. 2r. 34/9.,
Aquaduct piece of 5a. 35p., Lower Park of 3a. 5p„ Wood-field of
2a. 9p., Horse-doses of 9a. 2r. 37p., wood of Ir. 13/9., a close of
4a. 2r. 28/9., with bam and stable, and a dose of 3a. Ir. 27/9.
Lordship of Fazblbt.
Lot 10. Mill-meadow of 2a. Ir., Mill-holme of 7a. 3r. 7p.
Lot 11. Meadow, garden, and Wash-whed cut of about
10a. 3r. 2/9.
Lordship of Bolbhall and Glasgotb.
Lot 12. Allport close of 4a. 39p.
Lot 13. Allport close of 2a. 3r. 25/9.
xlyiii. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
Lot 14. AUport dose and garden of 3a. Ir. 3^.
Lot 15. Two enclosures of garden, — ^Allport close of 4a.
Ir. I2p.
htys 16. Allport dose — garden— of la. 3r. 3^.
Lot 17. Two indosores of 2a. 2r. 4p* and la* 2r. ISp,
Lot 18. Fonr indosores of Zip,, 3r. S7p., la. 2r. Sp.,
la. Ir. 20^.
Lot 19* A dose of 4a. Ir. I2p., another of 3a. In 25p., a
cottage and garden of SOp.
Lot 20. A dose of 5a. Ir. SSJp., two more conjointly of 4a.
3r. 29p*
Lot 21. Nether-dose of 4a. Ir. 27p., Middle-dose of 4a.
Ir. ^., lower Middle-dose of 3a. Ir. Slp», Lane-dose of 3a. 3r.
l&p,, Bam-close of 5a. 3r. 6p., barn and yards of Ir. ^,, Rick-
yard dose of 4a. Ip., a coppice of 4a. 25p., Upper Middle-dose
of 5a. 3r. 3dp., put of Far-close of 5a. I5p. ; with coal-mines,
which with those comprised in the two next lots, were let on lease
for 14 years from Lady-day, 1831, renewable at option for 7 years,
at a royalty of Is, per ton of 1201bs. when worked, and a rent of
150/. per annum, whether worked or not, — ^the royalty forming a
part, — with power to open and dig for coals, a sm^Gsice rent of 3/.
per acre for land occupied being also paid.
Lot 22. Allotment on the heath of 4a. Ir. 34p. ; a cottage,
bam, yard, garden, and meadow, of about la. 25p.
Lot 23. A close of 7a. ITp., fiara-dose of 5a. Ir. 9p., Elm-
tree dose of 5a. Ir. 26p., common dose of 5a. Ir. ITp., Middle
dose of 4a. 3r. 24|9.» Four Acres dose of 4a. I4p., Glascote-heath
close of 3a« 3r. 9p„ the Segs close of 6a, 3r. ip.
Lot 24. Hopley dose, divided into two, of 5a. 3r. 9p., Dabbs',
Hopl^, or Spring dose, also divided, of 4a.
Lot 25. Hopley dose of 4a. Ir. 31., part of the same of
2a. 2r. 35p.
Lot 26. Stable and yard of 9p., garden of 20p., orchard of
Ir. 36p., bam and rick-yard of 20^., Hopley dose of 3a. Ir. I5p.,
Hopley dose of 4a. 2dp., ditto of 7a. 2r. 24p., ditto of la. 2r. 3Qp.
Lot 27. Two doses of 2a. 9p. and la. 2r. lOp.
Lot 28. Two closes of 2a. 2r. I2p, and 2a. 3r. Sip.
Lot 29. A dose of 3a. 19p.
Lot 30. A close of 3a. Ir. Tp.
Lot 31. A close of 2a. 2r. I9p„ garden of 24p., and dose of
2a. 2r. 32p.
Lot 32. Cottage and land of 3r. 20p.
Lot 33. Garden ground of 2a. 3r. 33p.
Lot 34. Garden, close, and garden of la. Ir. I^., la. 2r. Ip.,
la. 2r. 17p.
Lot 35. A close of 3a. 23p.
APPENDIX. xlix.
Lot 36. A garden of 2a. lOp.
Lot 37. A close of la. 3r. 34p,
Lot 38. Gardens of 3a. 27p. and 20p.
Lot 39. Two closes of 2a. 2r. S9p. and 2a. 3r. SSp.
Lot 40. Three closes of 3r. S4p., 3r. 34p., and la. 3r. 3d/i.
Lot 41. Three closes of 2a. 2r. I5p., la. 2r. 9p., la. Ir.
1 7p., and part of Vincent's meadow of 2a. Ir. Sp.
Lordship of Aminoton.
Lot 42. The Ashlands of 4a. 2Sp., 2a. Ir. 4p., 2a. 23/?., 2a.
Ir. 38/7., a house and garden of S9p. Ashlands of la. 2r. I2p.,
meadow of 33p.
Pbrrtcropts, Libbrtt of Bolbhall.
Lot 43. Garden of Ir. 3^., Perrycrofts of 2a. I9p. Perry-
croft, with house and bam, of la. 2r. ISp.
Lot 44. Perrycroft, — garden,— of 2a. 5p, ; charged, in com-
mon with lots 43, 45, 46, 47, with annuities of 20^. to the
bailifis, lOs. to the curate, and 10^. to the Schoolmaster.
Lot 45. Perrycroft, — pasture,-— of la. 2r. Sp.
Lot 46. Perrycroft, with a bam, of 3a. 2r. S5p.
Imt 47. Garden of 38/?., Perrycroft of 2a. 20p.
Borough of Tamworth and Lordship of Wioointon.
Lot 48. Two parts of the Bradford closes of 2a. 2r. 32p. and
3a. 28p.
Lot 49. Bradford of 3a. Ir. 2lp.
Lot 50. Part of Bradford's of 3a. Ir.
Lot 51. The remainder of the last of 3a. 35p.
Lot 52. A cottage and garden of 2r. 8p., part of Bradford's
of 3a. 15/1.
Bottom of Lichfibld-strbbt.
Lot 53. A cottage and garden of 21/»., a close of 2a. 2r. 2p,
Lot 54. Nine dwelling-houses with gardens, two cottages
with yards, and two gardens.
Lichfibld-strbbt.
Lot 55. A cottage with garden of 2r. SSp,
Lot 56. Two cottages with garden-grounds.
Lot 57* A dwelling-house and extensive garden.
Lot 58. A dwelling-house with a garden, and four tenements.
Lot 59. A dwelling-house, and four tenements, all with
gardens.
Lot 60. Three dwelling-houses with a garden.
SiLVBR-STRBBT.
Lot 61. A dweUing-hoose.
L TAMWORTH CA8TLB AND TOWN.
Markxt-btrxst, North bidb.
Lot 62. A dwelling-house, another adjoining with a garden,
and a third one.
Lot 63. Three dwelling-houses with gardens.
Tx>T 64. A dwelling-house with a garden.
MAaKBT-STRBBT, SoUTH 8IDB.
Lot 65. The Castle-inn.
Lot 66. Three dwelling-houses.
Lot 67. A dwelling-house.
Lot 68. A dwelling-house and garden.
Lot 69. A dwelling-house and garden.
Gborob-btrbbt.
Lot 70. A dwelling-house, once the Angel-inn, and garden ;
and a house adjoining, with a garden.
Lot 71. A house and garden.
Lot 72. A house ; also a house in Bolebridge-street adjoining.
BOLKBBIDOB-STRBBT.
Lot 73. The White Lion public-house, with a croft.
Lot 74. Six dwelling-houses, with gardens.
Lot 75. A dwelling-house and small garden.
Lot 76. A dwelling-house.
Lot 77. Three tenements under one roof, with small gardens.
Lot 78. Three dwelling-houses, with two gardens.
Lot 79. A house and garden.
GUNOATB-STRBBT.
Lot 80. Four messuages with small gardens, and a cottage.
Lot 81. The New Star public-house, with a garden.
Lot 82. A cottage.
Lot 83. Three tenements under one roof.
Aldbboatb-strbbt.
Lot 84. A dwelling-house and stone-yard.
Lot 85. Eight tenements adjoining each other.
Church-strbbt.
Lot 86. Three dwelling-houses, subject to a fee-fisurm rent of
48. 8d, a-year.
Lot 87. Four dwelling-houses.
Lot 88. Four dwelling-houses.
Lot 89. The Wheat-^eaf public-house, with four small tene-
ments.
Lot 90. Four dwelling-houses.
Lot 9 1 . Two dweUing-houses ; with a school and an extensive
building lately occupied as a carpet manufactory.
APPENDIX. li.
Lot 92. A dwelling-hoiiBe and garden.
Lot 93. Two dweUing-honses.
COLLBQB-LANS.
Lot 94. Two dweUing-honses.
Lot 95. A dwelling-hoase.
LiBBRTT OF THB CaSTLB AND LoRDSHIP OF FaZBLBT.
Lot 96. The Castle-mill and appurtenances, with ezclufiive
right of water, except the manorial rights ; with the mill-dam of
la. 2r. lOp.
LiBBRTT OF THB CasTLB.
Lot 97. Seckmgton-meadow of 8a. 3r. 28p.
Lot 98. Castle-meadow of 13a. 3r. 4p.
Dratton-Bassxt.
Lot 99. The Royals of 2r. 4p.
TaM WORTH.
Ijot 100. A garden, with a terrace-walk along the bank of
the river, with a summer-house and bowling-green, containing
altogether la. 2r.
Note 28, page 446.
Thb will of Thomas Gut, esq., so far as it rboards
TaM WORTH.
In the name of God. Amen.
I, Thomas Guy, of the parish of St. Mary Wooboth, in Lon-
don, esquire, being of souud and disposing mind and memory,
considering the uncertainty of life, do make my last will and
testament in manner and form following.
« « 4c 4c
I give and devise imto my cousin George Orton, son of my
cousin Mary Orton deceased, and his heirs and assigns for ever,
to his and their use, all those my messuages, lands, tenements,
and hereditaments in Tamworth and Wigginton, in the county of
Stafford, or elsewhere, which I purchased of Archdale Palmer and
Anne his wife.
Item, I give, devise, and bequeath unto my cousin John Vough-
ton, grandson of uncle John Vougbton, all that messuage, burgage,
or tenement, lands and hereditaments, in Tamworth and Wiggin-
ton, in the county of Stafford, or elsewhere, which I purchased
of his father John Voughton, to hold unto my said cousin John
Vougbton, his heirs and assigns for ever, to his and their use.
Item, All the rest and residue of my lands, tenements, and
hereditaments, and real estate whatsoever, in the counties of
Stafford, Warwick, and Derby, or any of them, other than and
lii. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
except the Almshouses and library with their appurtenances herein
after mentioned and devised, I give and devise unto and between
Elizabeth Hurt and John Hurt, the grand-children of my late
sister Anne Vamam, their heirs and assigns for ever, to hold as
tenants in common and not as joint-tenants.
Item, I give and bequeath to Thomas Hurt, one of the grand-
children of my late sister Anne Vamam, during his natural life«
one annuity or yearly sum of one hundred and sixty pounds, which,
with forty pounds per annum I am already bound to pay, makes
up two hundred pounds per annum, to be paid by equal quarterly
payments and to commence from my decease.
Item, I g^ve unto my cousin John Voughton, son and heir of
my said uncle John Voughton deceased, during his natural life,
one annuity or yearly sum of thirty pounds, to be paid by equal
half-yearly payments, to commence from the end of tiiree kalendar
montiis next after my decease, over and above the sum of twenty
pounds per annum which I am obliged to pay him by my bond.
And also I do forgive and remit unto him all monies that he doth
or shall owe me at the time of my decease, as heir or executor of
his late father, or otherwise howsoever.
Item. I give and bequeath unto Thomas Voughton, Humphry
Voughton, and Martha Voughton, children of my said cousin
John Voughton, one thousand pounds a-piece interest or share in
the capital stock erected in lieu of debentures made "forth for the
debt due to the army by an act of Parliament passed in the fourth
year of the reign of his Majesty King George, and attended with
annuities after the rate of four pounds per cent, per annum.
Item, I give and bequeath unto my cousin John Weetman the
father, in the county of Stafford, yeoman, son of my aunt Weet-
man, during his natural life, one annuity or yearly sum of fifty
pounds sterling, to be paid by equal half-yearly payments to
commence from the time of my decease.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Benedicta, William, Mary,
Eleanor, Elizabeth, Sarah, and John, children of my said cousin
John Weetman, one thousand pounds a-piece interest or share in
the said stock erected in lieu of the debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath to my cousin Anne Woodcock,
daughter of my said aunt Weetman, during her natural life, one
annuity or yearly sum of fifty pounds sterling, to be paid by equal
half-yearly payments, to commence from my decease.
Item, I give unto John Moor, William Moor, Thomas Moor,
Josias Moor, and Abigail Woodcock, children of my said cousin
Anne Woodcock, one thousand pounds a-piece interest or share
in the said stock erected in lieu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto William, John, Thomas, Cle-
ment, Mary, Anne, and Joseph, the children of Thomas Weetman
APPENDIX. liii.
deceased, six hundred poundB a-piece, interest or share in the said
stock erected in lien of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Mary, Elizabeth, and Thomas
Blood, children of Thomas Blood deceased, one of the sons of my
aunt Blood, one thousand pounds a-piece interest or share in the
said stock erected in Ueu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto John, Thomas, Benjamin, and
Samuel Mously, children of my cousin Elizabeth Shepard deceased,
by her former husband, one thousand pounds a-piece interest or
share in the said stock erected in Ueu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Richard, John, and William
Hudson, the children of John Hudson lighter-man deceased, and
grand-children to my aunt Hudson deceased, one thousand pounds
a-piece interest or share in the said stock erected in Ueu of deben-
tures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto the widow of the said John
Hudson deceased, during her natural life, one annuity of ten
pounds sterUng, to be paid her by equal half-yearly payments, and
to commence from my decease.
Item, I give and bequeath to Mary Hill, one other of the
children of the said John Hudson, one annuity or yearly sum of
twenty pounds sterling, to be paid by equal haH-yearly payments,
during her natural life : and to James, Charles, and Sarah Hill,
children of the said Mary Hill, I give and bequeath three hundred
pounds a-piece, interest or share in the stock erected in Ueu of
debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto my cousin John Blood, yeoman,
living in or near Tamworth, son of my aunt Johanna Blood, during
his natural life, one annuity or yearly sum of fifty pounds sterling,
to be paid by equal half-yearly payments, to commence from my
decease.
Item, I give unto Sarah, Robert, Richard, Anne, John, and
Johanna Blood, children of the said John Blood, one thousand
pounds a-piece, interest or share of the said stock erected in lieu
of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto the widow of Thomas Vough-
ton deceased, son of my unde John Voughton, one annuity or
yearly sum of ten pounds, to be paid during her natural life, by
equal half-yearly payments, to commence from my decease.
Item, I give and bequeath unto the children of the said Thomas
Voughton, viz. John, Timothy, Abigail, Mary, George, Sarah,
Jonathan, Anne, and Benjamin, one thousand pounds a-piece
interest or share in the said stock erected in lieu of debentures, as
aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto the children of my cousin Mary
Orton deceased, viz. Anne, Mary, Sarah, and Eluabeth Orton,
liv. TAHWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
one thousand pounds a-pieoe interest or share in the said stodc
erected in lien of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto John Cheatly and Mary Cheatlj,
the children of Mary Cheatly deceased, who was daughter of my
aunt Weetman, one thousand pounds a-piece interest or share in
the said stock erected in lien of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, to William Cheatly, husband to the said Mary Cheatly
deceased, I give and bequeath, during his natural life, one annuity
or yearly sum of ten pounds sterling, to be paid him by equal
half-yearly pajrments, snd to commence from my decease.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Benedicta Cheatly, anotho*
daughter of my aforesaid aunt Weetman, and now wife of John
Cheatly, near Tamworth, in the aforesaid county of Stafibrd,
yeoman, during her natural lile, one annuity or yearly sum of
fifty pounds sterling, to be paid her by equal half-yearly payments,
to commence from my decease.
Item, I give unto the children of the said Benedicta Cheatly,
viz. Lettice, Dorothy, Anne, John, William, and Mary Cheatly,
one thousand poundis a-piece mterest or shsre in the said stock
erected in lieu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give unto my cousin Joseph Blood, in or near Tam-
worth aforesaid, clothier, one other of the sons of my said aunt
Blood, one thousand pounds interest or share in the said stock
erected in lieu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto the children of Anne Harding
deceased, who was daughter of my said aunt Blood, viz. Anne,
and William, one thousand pounds a-piece interest or share in the
said stock erected in lieu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give to Mary Alcock, wife of Arthur Alcock, clothier,
another daughter of my said aunt Blood, during her natural hfe,
one annuity or yearly sum of fifty pounds sterling, to be paid by
equal half-yearly payments, to commence from my decease.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Johanna, Anne, and Sarah, the
children of the said Mary Alcock, one thousand pounds a-piece
interest or share in the said stock erected in lieu of debentures, as
aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Johanna Mitchell, wife of
Benjamin Mitchell, one other of the daughters of my aforesaid
aunt Blood, during her natural life, one annuity or yearly sum of
fifty pounds sterling, to be paid by equal half-yearly payments, to
commence from my decease.
Item, I give unto her son Joseph Mitchell, and to her daughters
Elizabeth and Mary Mitchell, one thousand pounds a-piece
interest or share in the said stock erected in lieu of debentures,
as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Joseph Osbom, son of my aunt
APPENDIX. ly.
Osborn, daring his natural life> one aonaity or yearly sun of
fifty pounds sterling, to be paid by equal half-yearly payments, to
commence from my decease.
Item, I give unto Sarah and Anne, daughters of the said Joseph
Osbom, one thousand pounds a-piece interest or share in the said
stock erected in lieu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give unto the two children who are now Hying of
Elizabeth, another daughter of the said Joseph Osbom, fiye
hundred pounds a-piece interest or share in the said stock erected
in lieu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I giye and bequeath unto John Wood, currier, and
Thomas Wood, hardware-man, both of Birmingham and grand-
children of Christopher Wood, two hundred and fifty pounds
a-piece interest or share in the said stock erected in lieu of
debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I giye and bequeath unto Anne Cawn widow, and late
wife of Robert Cawn deceased, during her natural life, one
annuity or yearly sum of twenty pounds sterling, to be paid her
by equal hidf-yearly payments, to commence from my decease.
Item, I giye and bequeath to William Cawn, tallow-chandler,
son of the said Anne Cawn, two hundred and fifty pounds interest
or share in the said stock erected in lieu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Sarah Colman, Elizabeth Sil-
vester widow, Anne Shaw widow, Martha Lawson now wife of
Lawson, and Margaret Alcock, children of Thomas
Alcock late of Tamworth clothier deceased, two hundred and
fifty pounds a-piece interest or share in the said stock erected in
lieu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, to Mary Alcock, one other of the children of the said
Thomas Alcock, I give and bequeath one annuity or yearly sum
of twenty pounds sterling, to be pud her by equal half-yearly
payments, during her natural life, and to commence from my
decease.
Item, I give and bequeath unto each of the children of Jane
Bayley deceased, and of Mary Stylman deceased, daughters of my
late unde Henry Voughton, five hundred pounds a-piece interest
or share in the said stock erected in lieu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Margaret Guy, and Samuel Guy,
the children of Samuel Guy late of Egham in the county of Sur-
rey deceased, five hundred pounds a-piece interest or share in the
said stock erected in lieu of debentures, as aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Anne Jenkyns, daughter of
Thomas Hudson deceased, one annuity or yearly sum of one
hundred pounds sterling, to be paid her by half-yearly payments,
during her natural life, and to commence from my decease.
Item, to the widow of Thomas Hudson deceased, I give one
Ivi. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
annnity or yearly sum of ten pounds sterling, to be paid her by
equal half-yearly payments, daring her natmtd life, and to com-
mence from my decease.
Item, I give and bequeath unto John Morling, son of Elizabeth
Morling late of Oakingham widow deceased, five hundred pounds
interest or share in the said stock erected in lieu of debentures, as
aforesaid.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Jane Whittaker widow, and one
of the daughters of my late aunt Hudson, during her natural life,
one annuity or yearly sum of fifty pounds stirting, to be paid her
by equal half-yearly payments, to commence from my decease.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Anne Rowney, daughter to the
aforesaid Anne Cawn, during her natural life, one annuity or
yearly sum of twenty pounds, to be paid her by equal half-yearly
pajrments, to commence from my decease.
Item, I give and bequeath unto Thomas Batman clothier, son of
Joseph Batman deceased, one hundred and fifty pounds interest or
share in the said stock erected in lieu of debentures, as aforesud.
And my will is. and I do hereby direct and appoint, that the
said several annuities or yearly sums hereby before bequeathed be
paid from time to time by my executors herein after named or by
the corporation herein after mentioned and intended, when the
same shall be obtuned and take efiect,' or their treasurer for the
time being, out of the residue of my estate herein after devised,
or the interest, dividends, rents, or other profits thereof, during
the several lives for which they are made respectively payable, as
aforesaid.
And as for and concerning as well the said several annuities for
life as the several shares in the said stock erected as aforesaid, in
this my will given to the said Anne Woodcock, Mary Hill, Bene-
dicta Cheatly wife of John Cheatly, Mary Alcock wife of Arthur
Alcock, Johanna wife of Benjamin MitcheU, Anne Rowney,
Martha Lawson, Margaret Guy, and Anne Jenkyns, I do hereby
order that the said annuities and stock so given to them respec-
tively as aforesaid, shall be paid or assigned to their own proper
hands or order respectively, and their own respective receipts
alone shall be sufficient discharges for the same, notwithstanding
their or any their covertures.
And my mind and will is, that the said several sums or parcels
of stock herein before bequeathed to my several legatees above
named, who at my decease shall be under age and unmarried,
shall not be paid or payable, or transferred or to be transferred
by my said executors or the said mtended corporation, until they
shall arrive respectively the men to be of the age of twenty -one
years, and the women to such age of twenty-one years or their
1 Hie goyonon of Goy'i hoepitel, Soathwirk, Inoorporated by act of puUamcnt.
APPENDIX. Ivii.
and of marriage, and which of them shall first happen ; and that
during such the infancy or single state of my said legatees re-
spectively, my will is, that my executors hereinafter named, or
the said hereinafter mentioned and intended corporation or their
treasurer for the time being, allow for the maintenance and
education of my said several legatees the interest, dividends, and
produce of the stock to them respectively given ; and also shall
allow out of the respective legacies or stock of such as shall want
to be put forth apprentices such sums of money as my said
executors or the said intended corporation or their treasurer shall
think fit, which said several allowances and sums of money shall
be paid to the fathers, mothers, guardians, or masters, of such
legatees respectively, and their receipts respectively shall be suffi-
cient for the same.
« « «
And whereas the masters, keepers, wardens and commonalty of
the art or mystery of Stationers of the city of London are in and
by one bond or obligation under the common seal, bearing date
on or about the Srd day of February, Anno dom. 1717, become
bound unto the governors of the hospital of St. Thomas the
Apostle in Southwark, in the county of Surrey, in the penal sum
of five thousand five hundred pounds, conditioned for the pay-
ment of one hundred and twenty-five pounds by them and their
successors for ever, by half-yearly payments, free from all manner
of deduction whatsoever, in the following manner, viz. to me, the
said Thomas Guy, during my natural life, and from and after my
decease to such person and persons, uses, intents, and purposes,
as I, by my last will and testament in vnriting or any other
writing under my hand and seal subscribed in the presence of
three or more creditable witnesses should declare, limit, and
appoint, as in and by the said obligation and condition, relation
being thereunto had, may more fully and at large appear :
Now I give and devise unto John Cheatly and John Blood
yeomen, Joseph Blood and Arthur Alcock clothiers, Thomas Or-
ion yeoman, John Radford, Robert Blood, and the said John
Osbom citizen and stationer of London, all that my Alms-house
or building containing sixteen rooms, fourteen of which said
rooms are now used and employed for the habitations of fourteen
poor men and women, and the other two rooms, being laid
together, are used for a library, with the house-of-office, gardens,
and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situated, lying, and being
partly in Gungate-street, and partly in Schoolhouse-lane, in
Tamworth, in the county of Warwick : to hold to them the said
John Cheatly, John Blood, Joseph Blood, Arthur Alcock, Thomas
Orton, John Radford, Robert Blood, and John Osbom, their heirs
and assigns for ever, in trust, nevertheless, and to and for the
h
Iviii. TAMWORTH CA8TLB AND TOWN.
uses, intents and purposes hereinafter mentioned : that is to say,
that my said trustees, and the survivors of them, and such othen
as shall succeed and be chosen m their room or place by virtue
of the clauses hereinafter in that behalf mentioned, or the major
part of them, shall and do, from time to time, admit and
place in the said rooms fourteen poor people, men or women,
inhabitants of the towns, viUages, or parishes of Wilnecote,
Glascote, Bolehall -street, Amington, Wigginton, and Hopwas, or
any of them ; my poor relations being first admitted, in case any
such shall offer themselves, whom they shall think proper objects
of such charity : and as often as any of them shall die, to place
others in their stead. And in case any such of the said poor
persons shall misbehave themselves, my said trustees for the time
being, or the major part of them, shall, from time to time, dis-
place such and put others in their stead, as they shall think fit.
And that the two rooms abovementtoned to be used for a library
shall continue to be so used ; or for such other uses, for the better
accommodation of the persons that shall dwell in the said four-
teen rooms, as the said trustees, for the time being, or the major
part of them, shall think ^U
And my mind and will is, that when and so often as any of the
said trustees shall happen to die, the survivors of them shall
choose in another person to succeed and be a trustee ; who shall
act with them, in all respects, as if he had been particularly
named with the other trustees in this my will.
And to prevent any legal interest of the said last mentioned
premises from going to the heir of a surviving trustee, it is my
mind and will, that as often as my present or future trustees, in
whom the legal estate of the same premises shall rest, shall be
by death reduced to two, that such two,' or the survivor of them,
shall forthwith convey the same premises to such other trustees
and their heirs, upon the trusts aforesaid, as my then acting trus-
tees or the major part of them shall think fit or direct. And I
do hereby order, limit, declare, and appoint that the said yearly
sum of one hundred and twenty-five pounds be paid by the master
and keepers, or wardens and commonalty of stationers above-
mentioned and their successors, by half-yearly pajrments, at the
feast day of St. John the Baptist, and the birth of our Lord God,
in every year, for ever, to my said executors, until such intended
corporation as aforesaid shall be obtained and take effect ; and
then to such intended corporation and their successors, to the
intent that my said executors, or the said intended corporation,
and their successors, do and may thereout pay the sum of one
hundred and fifteen pounds per annum, part thereof, by like half-
yearly payments unto the said John Cheatly, John Blood> Joseph
Blood, Arthur Alcock, Thomas Orton, John Radford, Robert
APPENDIX. lix.
Blood, and John Osborn. and the survivora of them, and each as
shall succeed them as aforesaid for ever» in trust, and to and for
the uses, intents, and purposes, hereinafter mentioned ; that is to
say, in respect of eighty pounds per annum, part of the said
yearly sum of one hundred and fifteen pounds, upon trust, and to
the intent that they do and shall pay thereout unto each of the
said fourteen poor people and such others as shall, from time to
time, be chosen in their stead, the sum of two shillings per week
for their maintenance. And what shall remain out of the eighty
poands per annum over and above such weekly payments shall be
expended and applied by my said trustees for reparation of the
Alms-house and premises, and for such other uses relating thereto
as my said trustees or the major part of them shall, from time to
time, think fit and appoint.
And for and in respect of the sum of thirty-five pounds, re-
mainder of the said yearly sum of one hundred and fifteen pounds,
upon trust, and to the intent that my said last- mentioned trustees
and such as shall succeed them, as aforesaid, for ever, shall and
do apply the same to the putting out of children apprentice, nur-
sing, or such like charitable deed, of four, six, or eight such
poor persons of the family of the Voughtons, or Woods, or
proceeding therefrom, as they shall think fit. And if none or
not sufficient of such can be found, then of such other person or
persons as they shall find to be proper objects of charity.
« « «
And I do hereby revoke and annul and declare to be null and
void all and every other will and wills by me, at any time or
times heretofore made, declaring this to be my only last will and
testament : in witness whereof I have to the same set
my hand and seal,. ....... on this fourth day of September,
Anno Domini 1724 ; and in the eleventh year of the reign of our
sovereign lord George over Great Britain &c., king, defender of
the faith, &c.
THOMAS GUY.
The will was proved on the 4th of January, 1724-5.
Note 29, page 487.
WARDENS OF THE BRIDGE OF St. MARY.
From ike Comrt Rotta,
1436 Hugh Colman. (May 2.)
1456 John Bayly.
1458 John Bayly.
1470 William Irp, William Green. (Oct. 23.)
1488 Henry Sweetlove, John Irp. (Nov.)
1505 William Bear, William Houghton. (Oct. 21.)
Ix. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
1507 John Mason, Ralph Lago. (Not.)
1509 John Lysott, Richard Clarke. (Oct. 16.)
1511 John Lysott. Richard Clarke. (Noy.)
1516 Nicholas Endsore, Richard Clarke. (Oct. 18.)
15. • Henry Draper, Henry Jenkins.
Supposed Aotbnturb of Hbnrt, Earl of Richmond.
At pages 98 and 99 of this History, an incident is recorded as
having heMIen Henry, earl of Richmond, on the eve of the
eventful battle of Bosworth-Field ; which has excited mnch grave
discussion, and upon which g^at diversity of opinion exists,
among the chroniclers and historians of our country. I allude to
the commonly-received belief that the Earl lost his way, and
passed the night without shelter, in a state of most painful appre-
hension and anxiety, in following his army from lichficJd to
Tamworth, on the evening, or night, of Thursday, August 18th,
1485.
In my frequent excursions across the beautiful country which
lies between Lichfield and Tamworth, this strange incident has.
many times, occupied my mind : and, in accordance with a wish
expressed by the most distinguished statesman of his age and
country, who has evinced a gratifying interest in the progress
and execution of my son's work, and to whom the work is de-
dicated, I now proceed to investigate this curious question.
The subject of my inquiry resolves itself into two heads : First,
Did the Earl of Richmond actually lose, or intentionally deviate
from, his road, upon the memorable occasion to which I have just
adverted? And, Secondly, what authority exists there for the
statement made by the accomplished Historian of the Queens of
England, that Richmoud again lost his way upon Atherstone-
moor, in returning from his momentous conference vnth the
Stanlevs at Atherstone, on the night of Saturday, August 20th,
1485. ?
First, That Richmond sent forward his army from Lichfield
to Tamworth, on Thursday the 18th of August ; that he followed
it, attended by a body-guard of twenty horsemen ; that on, or in
the vicinity of, Whittington-heath, he was met by some gentlemen
who had deserted from the standard of King Richard, to unite
themselves with the forces of the Earl; and that he did not
rejoin his army at Tamworth, greatly alarmed by his non-appear-
ance, till the morning of Friday the 19th, the historians of that
eventful period are unanimous in affirming. Previously, however,
to the discussion of the accidental or voluntary character of Rich-
mond's deviation from his route, I will describe, as clearly and
concisely as possible, the course, and principal ramifications, of
the road which leads from Lichfield to Tamworth, such as it now
APPENDIX. Ixi.
exists, and has probably existed from time immemonal. Some
ancieDt charts of the comitrv between Lichfield and Bosworth,
most obligingly transmitted, by direction of the right honourable
sir Robert Peel, from the British Museum, for the express purpose
of assisting me in this inquiry, unfortunately throw no light
upon the subject.
From Greenhill, the south-eastern portion of the city of Lich-
field, the old road to Tamworth proceeds in a direction south-east
by east. At the commencement of Whittington-heath, nearly
two miles from Lichfield, a road diverges from it to the left.
This, after passing through the village of Whittington, skirting
flsherwick-park on the south, and crossing the river Tame at
Elford-bridge, terminates in the Tamworth-Burton turnpike-road,
about one third of a mile south of Elford-village.
From the western boundary of Whittington-heath, the Lich-
field-Tamworth road proceeds directly across it to Packington.
Here, another branch strikes off from it at a nearly right angle ;
and passing along the eastern border of the heath, leads to Whit-
tington-village, distant nearly a mile, — not half a mile as asserted
by Button {Battle of Bostaarth-Field, page — ) — from the main
road. This road, still pursuing its easterly direction, crosses the
Tame at Hopwas-bridge ; and, shortly afterwards, reaching
Coton, distant one mile and a half from Tamworth, makes an
abrupt turn south-east by south, and enters the ancient borough
by Lichfield-street. From this sudden curve of the road at Coton,
a lane proceeds to the eastward ; intersects the Tamworth-Burton
turnpike-road to the south of Comberford ; the Tamworth and
Wigginton road, about one third of a mile to the south of Wig-
ginton-village, and terminates in the Tamworth- Ashby road, half
a mile to the north of Tamworth.
Assuming it as probable that the roads between Lichfield and
Tamworth have undergone no considerable alteration during the
last four centuries, we may conclude, from the preceding descrip-
tion of them, that the only two points at which a traveller could
accidentally deviate from his route, are the branchmg of the road
to Whittington at the western extremity of the heath, and the
apparent continuation of the Lichfield-Tamworth road at Coton.
Richmond, by his conduct in the battle of Bosworth, amply
confirmed the character given to him by history, for a degree of
prudence and circumspection bordering upon cowardice. He was
evidently a cold-blooded, calculating, rapacious animal; little
addicted to daring adventure or prone to indulge in the day-dreams
of an elevated imagination. Hence, it is highly improbable that,
except under the influence of some powerful motive, he should
have ventured to traverse alone, at such a period, a part of the
country to which he was a stranger ; or that he should have lost
Ixii. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
hiB way in one of thoee fits of abstraction of which the fervid and
imaginative brain is alone susceptible. The darkness of the ni^t,
it mast be allowed, was unfavonrable to the right progress of a
traveller upon a strange road : for the 18th of August of the old
corresponds to the 29th of the new style ; and there was no moonJ
Yet that the weather was warm and dry, and the sky consequently
not obscured by dense clouds, may be phiusibly inferred from the
hct that, four days subsequently, at the close of the battle of
Bo8worth«field, the body of the brave but unfortunate king Rich-
ard was found covered with Aut and blood.
What were the precise objects which induced Richmond at first
to loiter in the rear of his body-guard, and subsequently to leave
it altogether, it is impossible, at this distance of time, to deter-
mine. It should, however, be recollected that, at the period in
question, Elford was the property of lord Stanley, the second
husband of Richmond's modier. And is it not more than probable
that the noble lady would, with the natural anxiety of a mother*
repair thither, to meet and embrace the son whom the result of
the approaching conflict would either elevate to a throne, or con-
sign to eternal exile, or a violent and perhaps ignominious death. ?
Moreover, there were many powerful families in the neighbouring
country warmly, although secretly, attached to Richmond's cause :
and, with the heads of some of these, he had probably arranged
to confer either at the seat of his father-in-law in Elford, or at
Whittington or Comberford, in his way thither. This hypothesis
derives strong confirmation from the statement, explanatory of
his absence, given by Richmond to his army, on the morning of
his arrival at Tamworth. And, although I place no faith in the
honour or veracity of a prince naturally crafty and perfidious, and
whose memory is stained by an act of the foulest ingratitade ;* still
would it be ungenerous to farther aggravate the deformities of
Richmond's character by the imputation of a wanton falsehood.
To have lost his way in an unknown country would surely have
impUed no disgrace ; nor could any possible good have resulted
from the concealment of such an error, if it had really been com-
mitted. From a retrospect of the preceding facts, and the
1 Flrom the best celcolation at which I here been able to airire, the moon dianced
on the mornlnir of Sunday, August SI, UBS, This calculation is curiously conflnned
by a passing remark of Miss Strickland, at page S5, toI IV., of the *■ Lfeas i^ftKe Queemt
^ Englmmd."
S On the 10th of February, U95, Sir WiUlam Stanley was Judicially slaasfatered by
that monarch upon whose graceless head he had, ten short years before, on the field
of Bosworth, been mainly instrumental in pladoc the crown of Engrland, See Henry,
HUtory q/ Great Britain, fifth edition, vol. XI., page 41 ; and Hutton, Battle 0/
Boaworth-Iieidt page US. Such Is the gratitude of Princes. Unhappily, however,
the pace of history is slurred with numerous instances, equally revolting:, of regal
heartlessness or atrocity. The virtuous, the venerable and accomplished ffir Thomas
More terminated a lone lifo of nndeviatinff fidelity and devotion to the interesta of his
sovereign, upon the scaffold. Columbus returned, in chains, from the discovery of a
world.
APPENPix. Ixiii.
reasonings founded upon them, I am, therefore, induced to con-
clude that the deviation of Henry, earl of Richmond, from the
route of his army, between Lichfield and Tamworth, on Thursday,
the ISth of August, 1485, was voluntary, not accidental.
With respect to the second division of my inquiry, I, perhaps,
cannot do better than transcribe part of a letter, addressed by me,
some weeks ago, to Miss Strickland, the celebrated authoress of
" The Lives of the Queens of England," and exhibit a concise but
correct summary of the explanations, with which that lady has
been pleased to favour me. The following is an accurate tran-
script of the first, and most essential portion of my letter to her.
Birmingham, NoTember 6Ui, 1845.
In the fourth Volnme of yoor very interesting ** Lives of the
Qaeens of England/' is related a strange and peiiloas adventure said to have
befallen Henry, Earl of Richmond, in his return across Atherstone-Moor,
from his memorable interview with the Stanleys at Atherstone, to the camp
at Tamworth, on the night of Saturday, August the 20th, 1485. For the
authenticity of this narrative, you refer the reader to the historical writings
of Hutton, Speed, Guthrie, and Rapin. Strangely enough, however, I have
ransacked the volumes of all these authors, except that of Guthrie, which I
have, hitherto, been unable to procure, without discovering the slightest allu-
sion to the adventure, so pleasingly introduced by you. I shall, therefore,
esteem it as an especial favour if you will take the trouble of pointing out to
me the particular editions of the works of Hutton, Speed, and Rapin, referred
to in the foot-note at page 25 of your fourth volume.
It is a fact established by the concurrent testimony of nearly all the histo-
rians who have written upon the eventful period in question, that Richmond
either lost, or intentionally deviated firom, his road, in the march between
Lichfield and Tamworth, on the night of Thursday, preceding the battle of
Bosworth. Upon this point, Rapin, Hiatoire if Angleterre, tome IV., page
373, Kenneth, Hiatory of England, vol I., page 510, and Hutton, BattU qf
Botworth'field, page 52, with many other writers whom I might readily quote,
supply conclusive evidence. And it is surely most improbable that Rich-
mond, a man who never, on any previous or subsequent occasion, exhibited
the marks of a daring or chivalrous spirit, should have, twice within forty-
eight hours, exposed his person and his cause to the most imminent peril, in
traversing, alone, an unknown country, accessible to the scouts and foraging-
parties of a near and inveterate enemy*
As, at least, a plausible solution of the present difficulty, it has, therefore,
struck me that the writer, whoever he may be, upon whose authority you
have narrated the perilous adventure, and fortunate escape, of Richmond,
must have confounded Whittington-heath, a large tract of uncultivated land
lying upon the road between Lichfield and THmworth, with *' Atherstone-
Moor," a place of whose name or situation, neither history nor tradition
have, I believe, preserved a vestige ; and erroneously transferred the date of
the incident from Thursday the 18th, to Saturday the 20th of August, 1485.
1 am, moreover, strongly inclined to believe that Richmond did not retrace
his steps to Tamworth after his conference with the Stanleys. At Ather-
stone, he was seven or eight miles nearer to the enemy than he would have
been at Tamworth. Time was precious to the Earl. *' The forces of the
two brothers had, on that day '*— -Saturday the 20th, — " marched towards the
field," and Richmond's troops " had already entered Atherstone." Hutton,
again, distinctly intimates that Richmond lay one night, — ^which moit have
bdv. TAMWORTH CASTLE AND TOWN.
been that of Saturday the 20tfa,— at Athentooe. On Smday, the 21ft, the
armies are repreaentod aa hanng " been in view of each olher the iHiole
day:" and it ia icaroely probable that, at anch a momcntoaa crina, Bkh-
mond, coward aa he eeema to haTe been, ihoold haje absented himaelf tnm
his post."
The letter conclades with an explanation of the motiTes by
which I had been impelled to write it ; and by a smtable apology
for the intrusion of a stranger upon the lady's time and notice.
To this letter, I received, on the 27th of November, a looady-
written and not very satisfactory reply. In it. Miss Strickland
merely refers, for the authenticity of the controverted statement,
to a rare English edition of Rapin's History;^ mentions "an an-
cient chronicle in which the adventure u more particularly dwelt
upon, with a good many local particulars;" and concludes by
stating that the edition of Hutton referred to in her foot-note,
was obtained from a public library.
Of the ancient chronicle adverted to by Miss Strickland, I, of
course, know nothing. Guthrie's work I have not been able to
procure. But I fearlessly re-iterate the assertion advanced in my
letter to that lady, that neither the common editions of Hutton or
of Speed, nor the works of any British historian which I have
been able to consult, contain the slightest allusion to the strange
adventure of Henry, earl of Richmond, on Atherstone-moor, so
circumstantially detailed by Miss Strickland : and, as it is assu-
redly not mentioned in an original copy of Rapin's History, now
lying open before me, nor in the first octavo edition of Tlndal's
English translation of that work, it appears highly improbable
that it should have found admission into the second ; as stated by
Miss Strickland. Still, in justice to that lady's character as an
historian, I must admit that I have not yet had the opportunity of
consulting the particular edition of Tindal's work to which Miss
Strickland has so obligingly referred.
After all, however painfijd it may be to impugn the accuracy of
the most distinguished female historian of our country, I cannot
suppress my suspicion that, on the subject of the strange adven-
ture which is said to have befallen Henry, earl of Richmond, in his
way across Atherstone-moor, on the night of Saturday, August
20th, 1485, some flagrant error, with respect to time and place,
must assuredly have been committed ; nor my deliberate convic-
tion that there exists, in the works of the more reputable and
trustworthy historiams of our country, no good authority for Miss
Stricklantfs extraordinary narrative,
Shirley Palmer, M.D.
Birmingham,
December 27th, 1845.
1 Tlndal'i Tranilation of Rapln, HiiMre d^ Angleierre, Second edition, folio.
THE INDEX.
i Court. 1 70, 233, 237.— Pedigree of the fiamily. 238.
Address to queen Anne. 507.
Agate or Agas-lane. 187.
Agatewater-leader, account of. 187.
Aids and tallages. 57.
Aisle of the Church, North. 248, 258, 267, 286.— Description
of. 245.
South. 240, 253, 267, 288, 289.— Descrip-
tion of. 249.
Aldergate-street. 181, 182, 192, 196, 200, 201, 202. 322, 421,
423, 1.— Account of. 180.
Aldermen. 144, 156, 166. — list of. xxzi.
Almshouses. 148, 178, 193, 1 96, 200, 468, 484, lii, Ivii, Iviii, lix.
^Account of. 447.
Anker river. 1, 6, 187, 188, 191, 307, 393, 401, 421, 486,
494, 499.— Course of the. 7 .
Arms.— -Angus, earl of. 414.
Basset. 277, 278, 299.
Bates. 290.
Beardsley. 291.
Beauchamp. 278.
Beaumont. 500.
Bohun. 411.
Botetourt. 278.
Bott. 291.
Bourchier. 412.
Bradboume. 408.
Broome. 411.
Bruce. 407, 414.
Carleton. 295, 409.
Chester, earl of. 407.
Cholmley. 289.
Clare. 277.
Clarke. 293.
Clifford. 408.
Clinton. 277.
Cockain. 408.
IxvL INDEX.
Arms.— Comberford. 290, 500.
Comb, earl of Buchan. 501 .
Compton. 409.
Ck)tton. 281.
Deverenz. 412.
ETeringham. 501.
Eyre. 415.
Feiren. 277, 295. 406, 407, 411.
Fitzherbert. 501.
France and England. 277.
Frevilc. 277.
Galloway, earl of. 414.
Gray. 412.
Gredey. 291.
Hampden. 411.
Harper. 408.
HastmgB. 86, 408.
Heckatall. 415.
Heronvile. 500.
Huntingdon, earl of.
Hyde. 415.
Knowlet. 412.
Leventhorp. 500.
Longford. 408.
Loyaine. 407.
Marmyon. 295, 350, 409.
Mountford. 295.
Mttceg^ros. 411.
Okeover. 413.
Packington. 409.
Peverell. 407.
Kgot. 295, 408.
Flantagenet. 277.
Poinings. 408.
Puckering. 294, 409.
Quinci. 407.
Repington. 281.
Roche. 412.
Segrave; 407.
Shirley. 409.
Somervile. 415.
Spencer. 412.
Stafford. 278.
Stafford, earl of. 412.
Stamford. 281.
Stanley. 408.
INDEX. Ixvii.
Arms. — Stewart. 414.
Snfiblk, earl of. 414.
Sutton, lord Dudley. 501.
Thomas of Woodstock. 410.
Townahend. 410.
Uffbrd. 407.
Verdon. 407.
Vera. 410,501.
Vernon. 289.
Walsingham. 413.
Warren. 277.
Washington. 413.
White. 411.
Willington. 294.
Windsor. 411.
Assessors, list of. zxziii.
deputy, list of. rmv.
Association, Voluntary armed. 151, 441 .
Auditors, list of. xxziii.
Bage. 303.
Bailey's Fellowship. 425.
Bailiffs. 106, 107, 108, 112, 113, 119, 120, 140, 141, 142, 143,
144, 145, 146, 211, 212, 234, 235, 236. 426. 427, 431, 434,
450, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 462, 465, 470, 471, 472,
474, 475, 477, 478, 482, 487, 504, 505, 506, 507, zv, zzvii,
zzviii, xxix.— Charges against some. 117, xvi.-— List
of. zviii.
Bailiffs, high. 102. 103. 104, 105, 176, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182,
183, 184, 185, 186.— List of. i.
Bailifb, low. 102, 103, 108.^List of. iv.
Ballad of the Tanner of Tamworth. 92.
of sir Launcelot and sir Tarqnin. 418.
Banks, commercial. 154.
Barley-market. 187, 390.
Bars of the town. 182, 188, 186, 421, 422.
Bayly's grave. 179.
Beckmore. 184, 471.
Bell-lane, account of. 186.
Blake. 234.
Bolebridge-street. 155, 188, 192, 196, 200, 201, 202, 208, 322,
388, 390, 391, 396, 421, 422, 423.--Account of. 191.
Bradford. 184.
Bradford-street, account of. 184.
Bridges. 148, 156, 486.
Bolebridge. 90, 187, 191.-- Aooomit of. 491.— War-
dens of. 491,492.
Ixviii. IKDKX.
Bridges. St. Maiy'e Bridge. 158. 161» 164, 171. 185. 395.
422. 423, 484. 491 .— Account of. 487.— Wardens
of. 487. lix.
Broad-meadows. 1 84 .
BnU-baitiDg. 190.
Boll-ring, accoont of. 188.
BnU-stake. 188. 189. 190.
Bollstake-street. 187. 189.
Bollstake-well. 188.
Batcher-street. 210. xzzvii. — ^Aooonnt of. 176.
Butchery. 176.
Canefoor. account of. 182.
Caldeford-meadow. 184.
Canons. See prebendaries.
Castle. 89. 71.89. 105. 115. 120. 121. 123. 129. 131. 132.
148, 149. 157. 159. 161. 163. 170. 186. 187. 254. 273.278.
297.318.320.421.422. 443, 491.499. zlii. zlui. xHv. zbr.
zlyi.
History of. 323.
Description of. 398.
CasUe-court. 390.
Castle-green. 165. 186.
Castle-inn. 150. 312. 393. L
CasUe-lane. 181.423.
Castle-Uberty. 196. 200. 201. 202, 204. 205. 390. 393. 394.
443. 477. zlvi. li.
CasUe-mills. 115. 149. 208. 374. 380. 395.
Castle-orchard. 180. 181. 423.
Castle-park. See Leawood-park.
Cat-lane, accoont of. 181.
Catch-hofane. 189.
Cemetary. See Church-yard.
Chamberlains. 102. 103. 108, 138. 141. 189.— Lists of. riii.
XXY.
Championship Royal. 326. 327. 352, 353. 354, 355, 357, 359.
360. 520.
Chancel of the Church. 256. 258. 265. 266. 293. 300. 303, 304.
520.— Description of. 260.
Chantries in the Church.
Dean Bates' chantry. 512.
Royal chantry of Henry VI. 510.
Chantry-chapel. 240. 262. 297, 298. 304. 494.— Description
of. 265.
Chapel. Roman Catholic. 174.181,423. — ^Account of. 321.
Chanties left to the town. 450.
Charter of Charles U. 140.
INDEX. Ixix.
Charity, Ashley's. 462.
Ashmore's. 474.
Bath's, marquis of. 478.
Bayly's. 455.
Beardsle/s Elizabeth. 478.
Elizabeth. 464.
Richard. 463.
Blood's. 476.
Bradock's. 453.
Budd's. 463.
Cheatle's. 456, 457.
Chesterfield's, earl of. 459.
Clobury's. lady. 472.
Cope's 455.
Dones's. 480.
Drayton's. 458.
Ferrers', 457.
Fmney's. 455.
Gough's. 465.
Green's. 458.
Harooort's. 477.
Knight's. 482.
Langley's. 472.
Matthews'. 479.
Michell's, Elizabeth. 47 1 .
■ Henry. 457.
^Rebecca. 470.
Nethersole's. 462.
Northampton's, earl of. 477.
Orton's. 477.
Osbum's. 470.
Port's. 475.
Rawlet's. 441,446,466.
Repington's. 453.
Smith's. 459.
Suckley's. 451.
Symond's. 469.
Vaughton's, John. 464.
Richard. 462.
Welch's. 471.
Wightwick's. 454.
Willington's, Ann. 476.
Thomas. 476.
Wilson's. 481.
Charity-trustees. 434, 435, 450, 453, 454, 455, 457, 458, 459,
462,471,478,479.
IXX. IITDSX.
Charter, Edward Ill's, for fairs. 90.
Elizabeth's first. 105.
Elizabeth's second. 1 12, 229, 426.
James II's. 144.
Charters for paving the town. 90.
Charters, Anglo-Saxon, signed al T^mwoitfa* 1 9, 21 , 26, SI.
Choir of the Church. 240, 241.
Church. 1, 14, 113, 148, 151, 155. 157, 158, 159, 181,211,
320. 368. 372, 397, 425, 459, 461. 463, 470, 472, 478, 479,
480, 481. 494, 499, 510, 519, ix, xxxi, zxxvii, zliii, xliv.
Description of. 240.
History of. 213.
Church-lane. 196, 200, 201, 202, 891, 453, 466, 467.
Church-street. 159, 176, 177, 180, 181, 182, 186, 187, 196,
200, 201, 202. 388. 391, 396. 439.— Account of 175.
Church-yard or Cemetary. 176, 179, 252, 267. 271, 272, 306,
439.— Account of. 311.
Churchwardens. 168, 179, 251, 275, 450, 460, 461» 464, 465,
469. 470, 471. 473. 474, 476. 479, 480, 481.-^Liat of. xzziz.
Civil war of the 17th cent. 121 .
Cocket's lane. 192. 509.
Colehill. 158. 391. 423. 443.— Account of. 188.
College. See Deanerv and Prebends.
College-house. 229, 230. 234. 235. 441 .
CoUege-lane. 187. 196. 200. 20L. 202, 896. 441, 509, li.
Comberford. 70. 1 19. 120. 230. 240, 290, 300, 493, 494, xzvii.
Compton. 376. 378, 379, 402, 406.
Constables. 102, 103.— List of. ix.
Convent. 43. 47, 313. 323. — Account of. 815.
Councillors, town. 156.166. — List of . xxxii.
Cross. See Stone-cross.
Cross-street. 188. 210.
Crypt of the Church, description of. 252.
Cucking-stool. 73, 190, 191.
Danes destroy Tamworth. 36, 46.
Dead-lanes. 422. — account of. 192.
Deanery. 211, 227. 228. 229. 231.
Deanery-house. 176. 179. 215, 231.^Acconnt of. 313.
Deans. 176. 216. 217. 221, 223. 224, 226, 276, 298, 365, 368,
510. 511, 512. 513, 5l4,xxxiv,
Dean's bam. 181.
Dean's pool. 181.
Defence, subscriptions for the National. 152, :
Doomsday, mention of Tamworth in. 51, 52.
Editha. St., patroness of the Church. 42. 43, 21 1, 283, 301.^
Conjectures as to her identity. See Convent.
/
INDEX. bud.
Ellergate. See Aldergate.
Ethe^da rebuilds TfUQWorfh and dieo here. 38.
Fair, St. ildward'e, 90, 107. 213.
St. George's. 90, 107, 311).
St, Bwitbeu'8,r-properl7 St. Editb^'s. 113. 21 1 , 216.
Fairs. 144, iad.rrT-Acoonnt of, SI 1 .
Fee-fEurm rent of Tamwortb. 64, 66, 82, 89, 91, 106, 111, 119,
511.
Ferrers. 56, 62, 88, 105, 113, 130, 131, 130, 142, 182, 189,
190, 218, 221, 222, 262, 278. 379, 294, 295, 296. 297, 300,
303, 325, 347, 361. 362, 376, 400, 401, 406, 416, 442, 457,
459, 484, 494, 505, 513 ix, xi, xii, xiv, xvi, xxxvi, xlv, zlvi.
Acconnt of tbe fiunily. 363.
Pedigree of tbe family. 363,
Fire at tbe Castle-inn. 312.
Frankland's Scbolarsbip. 431.
Frevile. 89, 130, 176, 181, 182, 183. 185, 188, 192, 216, 217,
219, 297, 301, 337, 339. 346, 347, 365, 519, zliii, xliv, xlv.
Account of tbe family 350.
Pedigree of tbe ^Eimily. 362.
Gaol. 156. 485.
Gas-ligbt and Coke company. 155.
George, Holy Guild of St. 249, 425. 448.
George-street. 158, 160, 164, 188, 191, 193, 196, 200, 201.
202, 390. 391. 393. 396, 401. ^Account of. 187.
Green. 431.
Grumppeyerde. 1 78.
Gungateor Gumpigate. 176, 178. 179. 180, 186, 188, 192,
193, 196. 200. 201. 202, 210, 391. 421. 422. 423, 443, 444,
446, 447. 448. 464. 465. 467, 474, 1. Ivii.
Account of. 177.
Gay. 429, 443. 446, 447. 448. 468, li. Ini, lix.
Hastings. 89. 331, 345. 503, 504. See also Pembroke, earl of.
Account of tbe family. 64.
Pedigree of. 88.
Higb-street. 1 75.
Holloway. 185, 393, 421.
Holy-well, tbe. 509.
Hopwas. fieunily of. 181. 183. 218, yi. xxxv.
Horse-fair. 493.
King-street. 186.
King's ditcb. or Ofia's dyke. 17, 160, 185, 188, 189, 194, 422.
Lady-bridge. See Bridge.
Lady-bridge-bank. 164. 196, 402. 445.— Account of. 185.
Ladybridge-street. 185, 186, 421.
Lady-mills. 395.
Ixxii. INDEX.
Leawood or Castle park. 380, 393.
Leicester, earl of. 256, 312. See Townshend.
Letters. Earl of Essex to Richard Bagot, 1592. 116.
The bailifis to the earl of Essex, 1592. 504.
Sir Humphry Ferrers to Lord Backhurst, 1602, xiv.
Earl of Denbigh to the parliament-committee at Coven-
try, 1643-4. 132.
The commanders of Tamworth to the parliament-com-
mittee at Coventry, 1643-4. 133-4.
The parliament-committee at Coventry to the bailie,
1644. 505.
The bailifis' reply. 506.
Tho. Hmit to Henry Bagot, 1644. 134.
Sir Walter Scott to Thomas Bramall. 1 828. 41 9.
The rt. hon. sir Robert Peel to the town-derk of Tsm-
worth, 1837. 488.
The rt. hon. sir Robert Peel to the mayor of Tamworth,
1843.
Shirley Palmer, M.D., to Miss Strickland, 1845. Mii.
Library, permanent. 154.
Lichfield-street. 159, 184, 185, 196, 200, 201, 202, 221, 322.
391, 392, 396, 397, 421, 422, 423, 439, 483, 493, 494, 499.
xlix. — Acconntof. 182-
Lights. keepers of the. — ^List of. lix.
Littleton. 494, 495, 496, 497, 498.
Longevity, instances of at Tamworth. 199.
Lndgate-lane. 396. — ^Account of. 184.
Lunn's entry. 186.
Magistrates. 166.
Market. 107, 165, 186, 187, 210.
Market-cross. 187, 190.
Market-place. 160, 164, 176, 187, 210, 305, 398, 403, 484.—
Account of. 186.
Market-street. 158, 164, 186, 196, 400, 401, 202, 390, 393,
396, 401, 483, 484 1.— Account of. 186.
Marmyon. 58, 71, 89, 102, 130, 187, 216, 231, 278, 301, 320,
358, 362, 509, xlii, xliii.
Account of the femily. 323.
Pedigree of the femily. 350.
Mayors. 144, 156, 158, 164, 165, 166, 167. 169, 171, 172.—
List of. xxxi.
Meeting house. Baptist. 184, 322.
Friends'. 322.
Independent. 181, 322.
Methodists. 192, 322.
Unitarian. 1 88, 322, 519.
INDEX. budii.
Members of Parliament. See Parliamentary representatives.
Minister, Unitarian. 322.
Mintage, royal. 47, 503.
Moat-hall or house. 120, 184, 387. 396.— Account of. 493.
Monuments and tombstones in the Church. 262. — Account of.
285.
Moor-lane. 184.
Mortein. 337, 348, 349, 350, zliii.
National School. See School.
Nave of the Church. 240, 244, 256, 265, 267, 268, 284, 286.
— ^Description of. 24 1 .
New Church-lane. — Account of. 179.
New College-lane. 179, 312.
Ofiiei builds a palace at Tamworth. 1 7 .
O&'s dyke. See King's ditch.
Old Church lane. — ^Account of. 179.
Outwall-street. 182, 183, 422.
Parish-register. 110, 118, 119, 120, 121, 179, 195, 197, 245,
365, 494.— Account of. 304.
Park, Great. 390.
Parliamentary representation of Tamworth. 58, 109, 116, 138,
140, 142, 145, 155, xxvii.
Parliamentary representatives. 142, 145, 146, 428, 437, 438,
447, 504, 507, xxiv, zzviL^List of. xi.
Parson's lane. 181, 182.
Pedigree.— k Court. 238.
Ferrers. 363.
Frevile. 362.
Hastings. 88.
Marmyon. 350.
Peel. 436.
Repington. 231.
Townshend. 377.
Willington. 129.
Wolferstan. 496.
Peel. 149, 151, 154. 157, 158, 159, 160, 162, 168, 165, 167,
168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 185, 207, 210, 312, 402, 459,
462, 467, 485, 488, ziv, zxiii.
Peel-street. 196, 200, 322.— Account of. 184.
Pembroke, earls of. See also Hastings. — Account of. 77.
Perrycroft-gate. 193.
Perrycroft-lane. 422.— Account of. 192.
Pillory. 72. 190, 191.
Pinfold. 190.
Plague. 110, 118, 119, 121.
Poor-house. 196, 200, 443, 444.
Ixxiv. INDEX.
Population of the town and parish.— -Account of. 193.
Porch of the Chorch. North. 244, 246.— Deser^ition of. 246.
South. 250.
Prebendaries or Canons. 183, 186, 192, 218, 220, 223, 224,
225, 226, 510.
Prebends. 211, 217, 218, 219, 220, 227, 228, 229, 394. 510,
xliii, zliT.
Priest of the R. Catholic Chapel. 322.
Priest's lane. 181,182.
Quem-miUs. 115.
Raihroad.— Birmingham and Derby. 1, 156, 160, 193, 210.
Chumet-valley. 210.
Trent-valley. 210.
Recorders. 112,141, 143,428, 504, 507, zv, zxix.— List of.
zxiy.
Repington. 211, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237,
238, 239, 279, 281, 289, 299, 302, 304, 305, 310, 428, 442,
443, 453, 457, iv, zzzvi. zlii.
Pedigree of the family. 28 1 •
Revolt of Tkunworth. 4 1 .
Richmond, Henry earl of, at Tamworth. 97, Ix.
Rivers. See AoJcer and Tame.
Robin-hood. 4, 60, 468.
Robins. 383, 386, 387, 388, 389, 391, 392, 893, 897. 403, 499.
Roman-roads. 14.
Sacramental wine, chartered provision for. 513.
St. John's street, account of. 181.
Salter-street or lane. 1 5 . — ^Account of. 1 80.
Savings-bank. 154.
School, Free Grammar. 113, 148, 180,462, 467, 469,— Ac-
count of. 425.
Masters. 307, 310, 811, 425, 427, 431. 432, 433, 434,
435, 457, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 477,
480, 481.
National. 170, 187, 468. — ^Account of. 440.
Peel's. 183.— Account of. 436.
Schoolhouse-lane. 192, 421, 447, Ivii.
Schoolmaster's lane. 1 79, 1 80.
Seal of the Church. 222, 513.
Of the town. 160.
Segoris-gate, account of. 188.
Sergeanto at Mace. 107, 108.
Shirley. 375, 376, 401, 409, 413.
Silver-street. 182, 185, 196, 200, 201, 202, 391, 393, zliz.—
Account of. 185.
Spinning-school. 442, 448. 449, 470, 472.
Lane. 465.
INDEX. IXXV.
State of the town, acooimt of. 1 75.
Stewards, high. 102, 104, 105, 112, 113, 114, 115, 141, 143,
427, 433, 607, ix, x, xi, xiv, xv, xvi, xxix. — List of. xxiii.
low. 102, 104, xvi, zviii.
Stockwall-meadow. 184.
Stone-cross. 188,210. — ^Account of. 176.
Stony-lane. 457. — ^Account of. 178.
Swine-market. 176.
Tame-river. 1, 7, 8, 183, 184, 394, 395, 421, 422, 423, 445,
486, 488, 494, 499. Coarse of the. 5.
Tamworth Farmer's Club. 209.
Tamworth. — General history. 1 3.
Green. 493, 500.
Name of. 9.
Situation of. 1.
Sta£fbrdshire part, history of. 64, 119.
Warwickshire part, history of. 89.
Tasters or victual-conners. 102, 103, 108. — List of. v.
Theatre. 150. 176.
Tokens. 138, 141, 252, 153.
Tower of the Church. 240, 244, 283.— Description of the. 267.
Town-clerks. 112, 131, 141, 144, 146. 158, 293,310, 311,
464, 477, 507, xv, xxix. — ^List of. xxiii, xxxiv.
Town-hall. 119, 148, 150, 157, 158, 160, 164, 169, 170. 173,
183, 186. 187, 191, 440. 447.— Account of the. 483.
Town-walls, account of the. 421 .
Townshend. 151, 163, 243, 256, 396, 397, 402, 403, 406, 410,
411, 499, 520, xiv. xxiii.
Account of the family of. 376.
Pedigree of the family of. 377.
Trade of Tamworth. 149.— Account of. 207.
Transept of the Church. North. 240, 245, 256. 257, 265, 289.
— ^Description of the. 257.
South. 240, 249, 256. 257, 261. 263,
29 1 , 304.— Description of the. 25 7.
—Painting in the. 260, 281, 515.
Treasurers, xxxiv.
Vestry of the Church. 240, 258, 261, 263, 266, 277.— Account
of. 266.
Vicarage. 227 to 238.
Vicars of the Church. 220. 221, 229, 230, 510, xxxvii. xxxviii.
Vicars, Ministers, or Preachers of the Church. 168, 170, 227,
228, 233, 234. 235. 236, 237, 238. 301, 305, 307, 309, 310,
311. 431, 440, 441, 450, 451, 454, 460, 461, 463. 464. 465,
466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 480,
481, xxxviii.
Ixxri. IHDSZ.
Victoria-road. 322. — ^Aocomit of. 193.
Visits to Tamworth* Royal. Adelaide. 157.
Henry II. 56.
James I. and Rrinoe Charles. 120.
Victoria. 159.
Walfarlong. 181, 188. 421, 428.
Watchmen of the Church. 272.
Town. 102, 103. 104, 272, z, zi.
Waterleader. 187.
Weanlake. 184.
Whiston. 234. 427.
WiUington. 130, 131. 132. 133. 134, 293, 303. 382, 384. 386.
428. 429. 455, 476. 480, 481. 499. zzi. zxii, zxiy. xzvi, xxix.
— Pedigree of the &mily. 129.
Windows of the Church, stained glass in the. 277.
Wolferston or WoUerstan. 135, 287. 291. 303. 311, 403, 428.
429, 465, 466. 499. xziv.— Pedigree of the femily. 496. 498.
Workhouse. 148. 185, 196. 200, 206. 477.— Account of the.
442.
Wybomclane. 1 84. 1 85. 422.— Account of. 1 84.
FINIS.
TAMWOaTH :
PRINTKD BT ANn FOR JONATHAN THOMPSON.
-^X
J'jll 2 5 133'