Skip to main content

Full text of "Influence of calcium on the growth, yield, quality, and chemical composition of watermelons, Citrullus vulgaris Schrad"

See other formats


The  Influence  of  Calcium  on  the  Growth,  Yield, 

Quality,   and   Chemical  Composition  of 

Watermelons,  Citrullus  vulgaris  Schrad. 


By 

WILLIE  ESTEL  WATERS 


A    DISSERTATION    PRESENTED    TO    THE    GRADUATE    COUNCIL    OF 

THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  FLORIDA 

IN   PARTIAL  FULFILLMENT  OF  THE   REQUIREMENTS   FOR   THE 

DEGREE    OF   DOCTOR   OF    PHILOSOPHY 


UNIVERSITY  OF  FLORIDA 
January,   I960 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The  author  wishes  to  express  his  sincere  apprecia- 
tion to  Dr.  V.  F.  Nettles,  Professor  of  Vegetable  Crops, 
for  guidance  and  suggestions  throughout  this  study. 

The  helpful  advice  and  assistance  of  the  other  mem- 
bers of  the  supervisory  committee.  Dr.  W.  0.  Ash,  Dr.  F.  S. 
Jamison,  Dr.  D.  F.  Rothwell,  and  Dr.  B.  D.  Thompson,  is 
gratefully  acknowledged. 

Appreciation  is  expressed  to  all  members  of  the 
Vegetable  Crops  Department  for  their  interests  and  coopera- 
tion during  this  study. 

The  author  is  also  indebted  to  his  wife,  Mary 
Elizabeth  Waters,  for  assistance  in  the  preparation  of 
the  manuscript  and  for  continued  devotion  and  encourage- 
ment. 


ii 


CONTENTS 

Page 

LIST  OF  TABLES v 

LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS Till 

INTRODUCTION  1 

REVIEW  OF  LITERATURE 3 

Mineral  Nutrition  of  Cucurbits  ..........  3 

Effects  on  Yield  .....  3 

Effects  on  Quality  5 

Effects  on  Sex  Expression  and  Fruit  Set.  ...  7 

Effects  on  Blossom-end  Rot ••  8 

Calcium  In  Plant  Nutrition  .....  10 

Role  in  the  Soil 10 

Role  in  Plants 11 

Cations  in  Plant  Tissue  .............  13 

Cation  Accumulation  ..•••  13 

Effects  of  Nitrogen  on  the  Cation  Content   •  .  17 

Distribution  of  Cations  in  Plants 18 

METHODS  AND  PROCEDURES  20 

Greenhouse  Phase  ..........  22 

Field  Phase 25 

Description  of  Soil  Type  and  Soil  Test  ....  25 

Field  Methods 26 

Tissue  Samples  ..........  28 

Chemical  Analyses   ......  29 

Statistical  Methods   .  30 

RESULTS  OF  EXPERIMENTS  31 

Greenhouse  Phase 35 

ill 


Page 

Growth  Responses  ........  35 

Sex  Expression  and  Fruit  Set  .........  42 

Chemical  Composition   •••••••••••••  45 

Field  Phase 48 

Soil  Tests 48 

Growth  Responses 50 

Fruit  Set 56 

Chemical  Composition  .  .  .  • 57 

DISCUSSION 69 

Growth  Responses .  .  .  69 

Sex  Expression  and  Fruit  Set 77 

Chemical  Analyses   ...«•  78 

SUMMARY  AND  CONCLUSION 84 

REFERENCES  CITED  90 

APPENDICES 97 

A  -  Detailed  Soil  Test  Results  "by  Plot 97 

B  -  Analyses  of  Variance  Tables •  100 

BIOGRAPHICAL  NOTES  Ill 


iY 


LIST  OP  TABLES 
Table  Page 

1.  Calcium  levels  in  greenhouse  solution  cultures  •  23 

2.  The  composition  of  the  basic  nutrient  solution 

for  greenhouse  experiment.  .........  24 

3.  Total  bi-monthly  rainfall  recorded  at  the 

Horti culture  Unit  March  1  to  June  30,  1959  .   27 

4.  The  percentage  of  calcium,  potassium,  magnesium, 

and  sodium  at  six  locations  within  mature 
watermelon  plants,  1958  • 33 

5.  Test  of  significance  for  the  percentage  of 

potassium,  calcium,  and  magnesium  at  six 
locations  within  mature  watermelon  plants.  •   34 

0.  The  effects  of  calcium  treatments  on  the  dry 
weight  of  vines,  roots,  fruits,  and  total 
weight  in  the  greenhouse  experiment   ....  42 

7.  The  effects  of  calcium  treatments  on  flower 

production  and  fruit  set  in  the  greenhouse 
experiment 43 

8.  Test  of  significance  for  the  effects  of  calcium 

treatments  on  flower  production  in  the 
greenhouse  experiment   . 44 

9.  The  effeots  of  calcium  treatments  on  the  per- 

centage of  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium 

in  the  leaves  and  tips  of  plants  grown  in 

the  greenhouse .  .  .  .  46 

10.  The  effects  of  calcium  treatments  on  the  per- 

centage of  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium 

in  the  roots  and  fruits  of  plants  grown  in 

the  greenhouse  .........   47 

11.  The  pH  and  pounds  per  acre  of  available  nutrients 

of  samples  taken  from  the  watermelon  beds  on 
April  1,  1959 48 


Table  page 

12.  The  pfl  and  pounds  per  acre  of  available 

nutrients  of  samples  taken  from  each  side 

of  the  melon  beds  on  April  1,   1959 49 

13.  The  Influence  of  more  than  eight  Inches  of 

rainfall  on  the  removal  of  fertilizer 

nutrients  In  pounds  per  acre  from  the 

upper  eight  Inches  of  soil  in  watermelon 

beds 50 

14.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  early 

vine  growth  as  indicated  by  the  dry  weight 

of  eight  hills  per  plot 51 

15.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the 

number  of  early  U.  S.  Number  1  watermelons  •  51 

16.  Effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the  total 

weight  in  pounds  of  early  U.  S.  Number  1 
watermelons 52 

17.  Effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the  total 

number  of  U.  S.  Number  1  watermelons  ....  53 

18.  Effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the  total 

weight  in  pounds  of  U.  S.  Number  1 

watermelons .  . 53 

19.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the 

average  soluble  solids  as  per  cent  sucrose 

from  all  marketable  melons  per  plot   ....  54 

20.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the 

average  thickness  of  the  rind  in  centi- 
meters at  the  top  center  and  bottom  center 
of  all  marketable  fruits 55 

21.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the 

average  thickness  of  the  rind  in  centi- 
meters at  the  blossom-end  of  all  marketable 
fruits 55 

22.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the 

percentage  of  blossom-end  rot   .......  56 

23.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the 

total  number  of  fruits  set .  57 

24.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the  per- 

centage of  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium 

in  the  tips  of  young  watermelon  plants  ...   58 

vi 


Table  Page 

25.  The  effects  of  Calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the  per- 

centage of  calcium,  potassium,  and  mag- 
nesium in  the  leaves  of  young  watermelon 
plants  ......  59 

26.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the  per- 

centage of  calcium,  potassium,  and  mag- 
nesium in  the  tips  of  mature  watermelon 
plants • 62 

27.  The  effects  of  Calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the  per- 

centage of  calcium,  potassium,  and  mag- 
nesium in  the  leaves  of  mature  watermelon 
plants  .  .  .  . 63 

28.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the  per- 

centage of  calcium,  potassium,  and  mag- 
nesium in  U.  S,  Number  1  watermelon  fruits  •  65 

29.  The  effects  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the  per- 

centage of  calcium,  potassium,  and  mag- 
nesium in  watermelon  fruits  exhibiting 
blossom-end  rot ,. 66 

30.  The  average  percentage  of  calcium,  potassium, 

and  magnesium  associated  with  each  cal- 
cium and  each  nitrogen  level  in  both  vines 
and  fruits  from  the  field  experiment  ....  80 

31.  The  pfi  and  the  pounds  per  acre  of  available 

nutrients  from  soil  samples  taken  in 

watermelon  beds  from  all  field  plots  on 

April  1,  1959 98 

32.  The  pH  and  the  pounds  per  acre  of  available 

nutrients  from  soil  samples  taken  on  each 

side  of  the  bed  from  all  plots  on  April  1, 

1959 ;  .   99 

33-42.  Analyses  of  variance  tables 101-110 


vii 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS 
Figure  Page 

1.  The  twelfth  leaf  from  the  base  of  the  plants 

In  treatments  2,  3,  4,  7,  and  8  from  the 
greenhouse  experiment  •• ••••    38 

2.  Representative- root  systems  from  treatments 

2,  3,  5,  7,  and  8  of  the  greenhouse 

experiment ••••    41 

3.  The  interaction  of  calcium  and  nitrogen 

(Cajj  X  Nl)  on  the  magnesium  content  of 

the  leaves  of  young  watermelon  plants  ...    61 


4.  The  interaction  of  calcium  and  nitrogen 

(Can  X  Nq)  on  the  potassium  content  of 
U.  S.  Number  1  watermelons   ...... 


61 


5.  The  interaction  of  calcium  and  nitrogen 

(CaL  X  Nq)  on  the  potassium  content  of 
watermelon  fruits  exhibiting  blossom- 
end  rot .    67 

6.  The  interaction  of  calcium  and  nitrogen 

(Ca^  X  NL)  on  the  magnesium  content  of 
watermelon  fruits  exhibiting  blossom- 
end  rot 67 

7.  The  influence  of  calcium- on  the  dry  weight  of 

fruits,  roots,  vines,  and  total  weight  per 
experimental  unit  in  the  greenhouse  ....    71 

8.  The  percentage  increase  in  early  and  total 

yield  of  D.  S.  Number  1  watermelons  from 

plots  receiving  500  and  1,000  pounds  of 

hydrated  lime  over  plots  receiving  no 

lime 73 


viil 


INTRODUCTION 

The  watermelon  Is  one  of  the  most  extensively  grown 
vegetables  In  the  United  States,  yet  little  is  known  about 
the  nutrition  of  this  plant.  Florida  alone  produced  95,000 
acres  of  watermelons  during  the  1957  and  the  1958  seasons, 
which  comprised  31  per  cent  of  tho  southern  acreage  or  21 
per  cent  of  the  acreage  of  the  United  States  (80).  Rela- 
tively few  basic  nutrient  experiments  have  been  conducted 
with  watermelons,  mainly  because  the  extensive  type  of  vine 
growth  limits  the  feasibility  of  greenhouse  culture  tech- 
niques* However,  extensive  experimentation  has  been  con- 
ducted in  the  field  on  the  rates,  sources,  and  methods  of 
application  of  the  major  fertilizer  elements. 

In  the  South  watermelons  are  planted  on  light  sandy 
soils,  which  often  have  Inherently  low  calcium  supplies  and 
pH.  Watermelons  have  generally  been  considered  to  tolerate 
relatively  acid  conditions,  and  thus  the  liming  of  water- 
melon fields  is  not  normally  a  recommended  practice.  However, 
from  a  literature  review,  it  is  obvious  that  very  little 
research  has  been  conducted  on  the  effects  of  differential 
calcium  levels  and  soil  pH  on  the  yield  and  quality  of  water- 
melons  • 

The  objective  of  this  study  was  to  evaluate  the  ef- 
fects of  the  calcium  supply  on  growth  responses;  yield; 


2 
quality;  sex  expression  and  fruit  set;  and  the  concentrations 
of  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium  in  the  tissues  of  the 
Charleston  Gray  variety  of  watermelon.  The  study  was  con- 
ducted in  two  parts:   (1)  a  greenhouse  phase  involving  eight 
calcium  levels  in  nutrient  cultures  and  (2)  a  field  phase 
designed  to  study  three  levels  of  calcium  in  combination  with 
three  levels  of  nitrogen. 

The  results  of  this  study  may  be  beneficial  in  ex- 
plaining the  occurrence  of  certain  physiological  disorders 
and  poor  yields  often  obtained  from  watermelon  fields  re- 
ceiving apparently  adequate  fertilizer.   It  also  emphasizes 
the  need  for  additional  research  on  the  nutrition  of  the 
watermelon. 


REVIEW  OF  LITERATURE 
Mineral  Nutrition  of  Cucurbits 

Effect 3  fin  vleld 

The  extent  to  which  the  major  nutrient  elements 
affect  the  yield  of  watermelons  (Citrullus  vulgaris  Schrad.) 
is  variable,  depending  upon  the  element,  the  environment, 
and  the  chemical  properties  of  the  soil.  Hartwell  and  Damon 
(34)  reported  in  1914  that  the  best  yields  of  watermelons 
were  obtained  on  plots  made  very  acid  by  the  application  of 
sulfate  of  ammonia.  Examination  of  their  data  Indicated 
that  liming  had  no  effect  on  yield.   Hartman  and  Gay lord 
(33)  reported  no  significant  difference  in  yield  or  average 
weight  of  watermelons  grown  on  Princeton  or  Elk  fine  sand 
ranging  in  pH  from  4.7  to  7.5.  However,  there  was  a  trend 
toward  greater  yields  at  the  higher  pH  levels.  The  pH 
range  was  obtained  by  the  application  of  up  to  1,000  pounds 
of  elemental  sulfur  or  up  to  9,000  pounds  of  limestone. 

Hall,  Nettles,  and  Dennlson  (28)  found  no  significant 
differences  in  yields  in  a  factorial  experiment  on  Arredonda 
fine  sand  containing  three  levels  of  calcium  (0,  80,  and  160 
pounds  per  acre  supplied  as  calcium  sulfate  In  the  row)  and 
three  levels  of  magnesium  (0,  20,  and  40  pounds  per  acre  of 
magnesium  oxide  applied  in  the  row).  Hall,  Nettles,  and 
Dennlson  (29)  In  later  work  were  unable  to  show  benefits  from 

3 


4 
the  application  of  gypsum  alone  In  the  row.  Jamison  and 
Nettles  (40)  reported  that  the  application  of  soluble  mag- 
nesium with  all  Inorganic  nitrogen  increased  the  yields  of 
watermelons. 

Elsenmenger  and  Rucinski  (20)  observed  that  calcium 
hastened  maturity  of  both  watermelons  and  cantaloupes  by 
nearly  two  weeks  over  no-lime  treatments.  Apparently  the 
application  of  lime  augments  cantaloupe  production  on  soils 
with  low  pH.  Carolus  and  Lorenz  (14)  concluded  that  the 
application  of  lime  to  light  acid  soils  promotes  early  ma- 
turity and  increases  yields  of  muskmelons.  Hartman  and 
Gaylord  (32)  obtained  an  increase  of  cantaloupes  from  160 
bushels  to  350  bushels  per  acre  by  increasing  the  soil  pH 
from  4.7  to  7.2  with  limestone.  Other  cucurbits  including 
cucumbers,  squash,  and  pumpkins  apparently  yield  more  when 
grown  on  soils  moderately  supplied  with  calcium  and  within 
the  pH  range  of  5.5  to  7.0  (42,  83). 

Considerable  research  relative  to  the  effect  of  N-P-K 
fertilizers  on  yields  has  been  reported.  Hall,  Nettles,  and 
Dennison  (29)  concluded  after  five  years  of  experimentation 
at  several  locations  in  Florida  that  60  pounds  per  acre  each 
of  potassium  and  nitrogen  were  ample  to  give  maximum  yields 
in  seasons  with  reasonably  favorable  rainfall.  This  is,  in 
general,  supported  by  data  presented  by  Nettles  and  Halsey(53) 
in  1958.  Bradley  and  Fleming  (10)  observed  similar  results 
on  Norfolk  fine  sand  in  Arkansas.  They  stated  that  60  pounds 


5 
each  of  nitrogen,  potassium,  and  phosphorus  was  adequate  for 
good  yields.   In  a  somewhat  drier  area  in  Texas,  Smith  and 
Mohr  (70)  conoluded  alter  four  years  tests  on  Hockley  fine 
sand  that  20  pounds  of  nitrogen,  40  pounds  of  phosphorus,  and 
40  pounds  of  potassium  produced  maximum  yields.   However, 
Patterson  and  Smith  (57)  reported  significant  increases  in 
yield  from  up  to  200  pounds  of  potassium  on  Hockley  fine 
sand  in  Texas.  According  to  Brantley  (11)  nitrogen  Increased 
early  marketable,  total  marketable,  and  total  yield  of  water- 
melons In  Indiana  on  Princeton  fine  sand  in  a  season  of 
heavy  rainfall  but  not  in  a  moderately  dry  season.  Potassium 
did  not  affect  yields  in  either  season. 

Effgc^s  qr  quality 

It  has  long  been  known  that  the  quality  of  watermelons, 
especially  the  soluble  solids,  is  influenced  by  both  heredity 
and  environmental  factors  (60,  85).  The  effects  of  these  fac- 
tors have  been  established;  however,  research  relative  to  the 
true  influence  of  different  nutrient  elements  is  less  apparent. 
Hartman  and  Gaylord  (33)  reported  that  the  application  of  up 
to  9,000  pounds  of  ground  limestone  did  not  significantly  in- 
crease the  percentage  of  sucrose.   Hall,  Nettles,  and  Dennison 
(28,  29)  observed  that  neither  calcium  sulfate  nor  magnesium 
oxide  had  any  significant  effect  on  the  percentage  of  soluble 
solids,  hollow-heart,  or  white-heart.  However,  Eisenmenger 
and  Kucinskl  (20)  stated  that  Cantaloupes  and  watermelons 
grown  on  land  treated  with  Calcium  were  considerably  higher 


6 
in  sugar  content,  although  no  data  were  presented.  Mazaeva 
(47)  observed  that  magnesium  increased  the  sugar  content  of 
watermelons  grown  in  pots  of  light  sodpodzolized  soil.  Ac- 
cording to  Morazov  (52)  the  application  of  sodium  chloride 
or  sodium  sulfate  to  the  soil  decreased  the  monosaccharides 
and  the  total  sugar  content  of  both  watermelons  and  musk- 
melons. 

Work  by  Brantley  (11)  and  by  Kimbrough  (41)  indicated 
that  up  to  250  pounds  of  elemental  nitrogen  had  no  signifi- 
cant effect  on  the  percentage  of  soluble  solids  in  water- 
melons. Bradley  and  Fleming  (10)  reported  a  significant 
increase  in  soluble  solids  as  a  result  of  an  interaction  be- 
tween nitrogen  and  phosphorus  and  an  interaction  between 
phosphorus  and  potassium,  but  other  quality  measurements  such 
as  hollow-heart,  white-heart,  and  rind  thickness  were  not 
affected  by  any  fertilizer  treatment.  When  yields  were  not 
affected  by  fertilizer  treatments,  soluble  solids  were  not 
affected;  therefore,  they  concluded  that  providing  adequate 
fertilizer  assures  good  quality.   In  contrast  to  this.  Hall, 
Nettles,  and  Oennison  (28)  concluded  after  several  experi- 
ments that  neither  potassium  nor  nitrogen  had  any  significant 
effect  on  soluble  solids,  white-heart,  or  hollow-heart. 
Brantley  (11)  found  no  effect  from  differential  levels  of 
potassium  on  the  quality  of  watermelons  or  cantaloupes. 
Woodard  (85)  demonstrated  that  the  occurrence  of  white-heart 
of  watermelons  was  associated  with  heredity  and  not  with 
nitrogen  source. 


7 
Pffg<rtg  fin  ££&  enreaginn  and  fruit  set 

The  nature  of  the  effect,  if  any,  of  the  cation*  on 
sex  expression  and  fruit  set  has  not  been  clearly  defined. 
Hasler  and  Maurizio  (35)  reported  that  insufficient  amounts 
of  potassium  as  well  as  nitrogen  and  phosphorus  resulted  in 
both  poor  flowering  and  seed  set  in  winter  rape  (Brassica 
flajma).  According  to  Mazaeva  (47) ,  magnesium  acts  on  repro- 
ductive organs,  tending  to  Increase  female  flowers  in  many 
crops.  Stark  and  Haut  (72)  found  that  flower  production 
in  cantaloupes  was  inhibited  when  the  potassium  level  was 
dropped  to  0.25  mllliequivalents  per  liter  (9.15  ppm) . 
There  was  a  positive  response  of  fruit  set  to  high  levels 
of  calcium:   10  and  15  mllliequivalents  per  liter  (200,  300 
ppm).  A  concentration  of  0.2  mllliequivalents  per  liter 
(2.4  ppm)  of  magnesium  was  inadequate  for  normal  fruit  set. 

After  comprehensive  literature  reviews  on  the 
physiological  aspects  of  sex  expression,  Loehwing  (45)  and 
Heslop  (36)  concluded  that,  with  the  exception  of  carbohy- 
drates and  nitrogen,  general  nutrition  Is  not  a  major  factor 
in  sex  expression  in  monoecious  and  dioecious  species. 
Furthermore,  Loehwing  (45)  stated  that  highly  localized  com- 
positional differences  are  much  more  significant  than  general 
composition,  not  only  in  relation  to  flowering  but  also  in 
determining  sexes  in  various  floral  parts. 

There  are  numerous  reports  in  the  literature  to  the 
effect  that  increased  nitrogen  concentrations  In  the  substrate 


8 
enhanced  female  sex  expression  in  plants.  Thompson  (76) 
working  with  spinach,  Tibeau  (77)  with  hemp,  and  Sahlnin  (64) 
with  corn  observed  that  high  levels  of  nitrogen  stimulated 
the  production  of  pistillate  flowers  while  low  nitrogen  levels 
favored  stamlnate  flower  formation.  Similar  observations 
have  been  reported  by  Tied j ens  (78)  and  Dearborn  (18)  for 
cucumbers  (Cucumis  sativus),  by  Hall  (30)  for  gherkins 
(Cucumis  anguria) f  by  Sabinin  (64)  and  Minina  (51)  for  cu- 
cumbers and  watermelons,  and  by  Brantley  (11)  for  cantaloupes 
and  watermelons. 

The  Influence  of  nitrogen  on  fruit  set  is  similar  to 
its  effect  on  yields.   In  general.  Increasing  Increments  of 
nitrogen  up  to  a  critical  maximum  enhances  fruit  set  while 
additional  increments  tend  to  decrease  fruit  set  (11,  17). 
Work  by  Jamison  and  Nettles  (40)  and  by  Cunningham  (17)  indi- 
cates that  late  side-dressing  with  nitrogen  delays  and  de- 
creases fruit  set. 

Effects  on  blossom-end  rot 

The  precise  cause  of  watermelon  blossom-end  rot  has 
not  been  determined.  Blossom-end  rot  first  appears  as  a 
water-soaked  area  at  the  blossom-end,  later  turning  brown, 
and  often  invaded  by  saprophytic  and  parasitic  fungi  (56, 
73).  The  disease  has  been  attributed  to  many  factors — includ- 
ing pathogenio  organisms,  disarrangement  of  internal  nutrition, 
improper  moisture  supply,  poor  pollination  and/or  fertiliza- 
tion.  Pathologists  (56,  75)  have  shown  that  a  large  number 


9 
of  both  saprophytic  and  parasitic  organisms  have  been  asso- 
ciated with  blossom-end  rot.   Parris  (56)  reported  that 
WftiHW  debanram*ffi  and  P.  anhanldermatufl  started  the  Infection 
Taubenhaus  (75)  in  1921  concluded  that  Diolodia  tuberlcola 
caused  blossom-end  rot  of  watermelons.   However,  Blodgett  (8) 
was  unable  to  control  the  disease  by  use  of  fungicides. 

Stuckey  (73)  postulated  in  1924  that  blossom-end  rot 
is  probably  a  physiological  disturbance  brought  on  by  rapid 
changes  in  soil  moisture  as  the  young  fruit  start  to  grow. 
He  reported  it  is  of  little  consequence  in  low-lying  loamy 
sands  where  the  water  table  is  near  the  surface.  Walker  (82) 
in  1931  noted  that  blossom-end  rot  had  been  observed  in  con- 
nection with  pollination  work  and  that  defective  pollination 
appeared  to  be  the  most  important  factor  in  initiating  it. 
He  pointed  out  that  considerable  decline  of  the  melon  occurred 
before  fungi  appeared.  Nettles  and  Halsey  (53)  were  unable 
to  associate  the  incidence  of  blossom-end  rot  with  fertilizer 
rates  of  up  to  2,000  pounds  of  6-8-8  or  with  plant  spacings 
of  3,  6,  9,  and  12  feet.  Everett  and  Geraldson  (22)  obtained 
a  lower  percentage  of  melons  exhibiting  blossom-end  rot  from 
plots  receiving  one-half  ton  of  hydrated  lime  or  gypsum  per 
acre  plus  two  tons  of  dolomite  than  from  plots  receiving 
dolomite  alone. 

Geraldson  (27)  has  shown  similar  blossom-end  disorders 
in  tomatoes  and  peppers  may  be  produced  by  insufficient  cal- 
cium in  the  substrate  or  by  high  concentrations  of  soluble 
salts.  Taylor  and  Smith  (74)  reported  significant  increases 


10 
in  blossom-end  rot  of  tomatoes  as  a  result  of  high  nitrogen 
levels. 

Brantley  (11)  associated  the  occurrence  of  blossom- 
end  rot  of  watermelons  with  high  nitrogen  levels;  however, 
no  data  were  presented. 

Calcium  in  Plant  Nutrition, 

Role  in  the  soil 

Soil  scientists  have  vividly  demonstrated  that  the 
application  of  lime  affects  not  only  the  chemical  properties 
of  the  soil  but  also  the  biological  and  physical  properties 
as  well.  The  beneficial  chemical  effects  of  liming  acid 
soils  result  from:   (l)  increased  availability  of  calcium 
and  possibly  certain  other  nutrient  elements  and  (2)  pH 
changes  which  influence  the  solubility  of  other  elements, 
both  essential  and  non-essential. 

In  work  reported  by  Marshall  (46)  a  considerable  part 
of  the  absorbed  calcium  in  kaolinitic  type  clays  became  active 
at  calcium  saturation  percentages  of  39  to  59  while  70  to  80 
per  cent  calcium  saturation  was  necessary  in  montmorlllonitic 
type  clays.  According  to  Sharpies  and  Foster  (66)  maximum 
growth  of  cantaloupes  on  Arizona  desert  soil  occurred  between 
50  to  60  per  cent  calcium  saturation  with  growth  decreasing 
rapidly  on  either  side  of  this  range.  Fried  and  Peeoh  (25) 
in  several  field  and  greenhouse  experiments  have  demonstrated 
that  increasing  the  calcium  supply  with  gypsum,  in  contrast 
to  limestone,  failed  to  increase  plant  growth  of  such  crops 


11 

as  barley,  alfalfa,  and  perennial  ryegrass. 

Many  workers  have  shown  that  the  solubility  of  alumi- 
num, manganese,  iron,  boron,  copper,  and  zinc  increases  with 
increasing  acidity  (25,  38,  61,  65,  71,  86).  Toxic  concentra- 
tions of  such  elements  as  aluminum,  manganese,  and  iron  may 
develop  below  pH  5.5;  moreover,  such  elements  as  manganese, 
iron,  and  boron  may  become  deficient  above  pH  6.5. 

The  soil  biological  population  is  Influenced  by  cal- 
cium directly  as  an  essential  element  for  metabolism  and 
indirectly  through  alterations  in  the  soil  reaction  (l,  4, 
13,  83).  Microbiologists  have  demonstrated  that,  in  general, 
fungi  thrive  when  the  pil  is  below  6  and  bacteria  and  acti- 
nomycetes  prefer  media  above  pH  6  (1,  13,  48,  81).  This 
points  out  the  necessity  for  liming  acid  soils  to  obtain 
maximum  benefits  from  nitrifying  bacteria  as  well  as  from 
other  biological  processes  involving  principally  bacteria. 

Baver  and  Hall  (5)  and  Meyers  (49)  have  shown  that 
calcium  ions  do  not  affect  the  physical  properties  of  organic 
or  inorganic  colloids  any  more  than  do  hydrogen  ions.  After 
reviewing  the  literature  on  this  subject  Baver  (4)  concluded 
the  main  effect  of  lime  on  the  soil  physical  properties, 
especially  aggregation,  resulted  indirectly  from  its  effect 
on  the  production  and  decomposition  of  organic  matter. 

£fil£  in  Plants 

Calcium  enters  into  several  important  physiological 
processes  within  the  plant.  One  of  its  most  important  roles 


12 
is  the  reaction  with  pectle  acids  to  form  calcium  pectate, 
a  constituent  of  the  middle  lamella  of  the  cell  wall  (9,  48, 
50).  Peotlc  acid  Is  composed  of  long  chains  of  galacturonic 
acid  residues  which  possess  the  6-nembered  pyranose  ring 
structure  with  a  carboxyl  group  on  the  number  five  carbon. 
This  carboxyl  group  is  free  to  combine  with  available  cations 
such  as  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium  thereby  forming 
pectates. 

Calcium  reacts  with  certain  organic  acids,  especially 
oxalic  and  malic,  to  form  relatively  Immobile  oxalate  com- 
pounds (6,  9,  79).  According  to  Meyer  and  Anderson  (48) 
these  oxalate  compounds  occur  in  the  cell  vacuoles  In  large 
quantities. 

Plant  physiologists  point  out  that  it  was  once  be- 
lieved that  organic  acids  were  toxic;  therefore,  calcium  and 
other  cations  were  absorbed  to  precipitate  these  acids. 
However,  according  to  Meyer  and  Anderson  (48)  and  Shear, 
Crane,  and  Meyers  (68)  cell  sap  must  be  electrostatically 
neutral;  therefore,  if  greater  absorption  of  cations  than 
anion  occurs  the  plant  cells  produce  certain  organic  acids 
to  precipitate  the  cations. 

Nightingale  (54)  reported  that  In  the  absence  of  cal- 
cium some  species  are  unable  to  absorb  nitrates. 

It  Is  generally  believe  that  calcium  is  necessary  for 
the  continued  growth  of  meristematlc  tissue.  This  is  appar- 
ent by  the  symptoms  of  calcium  deficient  plants.  The  leaves 
of  plants  grown  In  media  low  in  Calcium,  especially  the 


13 
young  leaves,  often  are  distorted,  dark  green  In  color,  and 
the  margins  pointed  downward  or  cupped  under  (48,  50) .   In 
severe  cases  a  deficiency  Is  manifested  by  cessation  of 
terminal  growth  and  the  development  of  chlorosis  and  necrotic 
areas  even  in  the  older  growth. 

Calcium  plays  another  Important  role  In  plant  growth 
by  its  antagnostic  effects  on  the  absorption  of  other  ions 
(21,  44,  48,  50,  56,  79).   The  antagonism  apparently  works 
in  at  least  two  ways.  First,  less  toxic  ions  may  depress 
the  uptake  or  accumulation  of  more  toxic  ions.  For  example, 
sodium,  potassium,  or  magnesium  may  be  toxic  in  single-salt 
solutions;  however,  this  toxic  effect  is  eliminated  by  the 
addition  of  calcium.  Second,  proteins  may  become  saturated 
with  a  single  salt  thereby  changing  their  normal  composition. 
The  addition  of  other  salts  tends  to  balance  the  protein 
colloidal  system. 

CaUppg  In  Plant  llama. 
Pat ton  accumulation 

It  has  been  demonstrated  many  times  that  the  concen- 
tration and  type  of  nutrient  elements  occurring  in  plant  tis- 
sue is  dependent  upon  a  number  of  interrelated  environmental 
conditions  as  well  as  the  plant  species  in  question.  Numerous 
literature  reviews  point  out  that  the  ratio  or  balance  of  the 
various  ions  In  the  substrate  has  a  direct  effect  on  the 
chemical  composition  of  the  tissue  (6,  13,  21,  63,  65,  74) • 
In  a  refinement  and  extension  of  nutritional  theories  proposed 


14 
by  earlier  workers.  Shear  and  co-workers  (67,  68,  69)  state 
that  plant  growth  is  a  function  of  two  nutritional  variables, 
intensity  and  balance,  which  are  reflected  in  the  composition 
of  leaves  when  the  plants  are  In  the  same  stage  of  growth 
and  development*  Intensity  refers  to  the  total  equivalent 
concentration  of  all  functional  nutrient  elements  in  the 
plant.  They  pointed  out  that  there  is  a  definite  cation: 
anion  ratio  within  the  plant;  therefore,  an  accumulation  of 
one  or  more  cations  must  be  accompanied  by  an  equivalent 
decrease  in  one  or  more  cations  at  any  given  anion  level. 
Likewise,  an  accumulation  of  one  or  more  anions  at  a  given 
cation  level  must  be  accompanied  by  a  decrease  in  one  or 
more  anions.  The  simultaneous  accumulation  of  both  cations 
and  anions,  either  organic  or  Inorganic,  in  plant  tissue  has 
been  observed  by  many  authors  (3,  13,  26,  63,  68,  69,  79). 

Cooper  (16)  concluded  that  the  relative  rate  of  ab- 
sorption and  accumulation  of  nutrients  by  plants  is  propor- 
tional to  the  relative  activity  (energy  properties)  of  the 
nutrients  as  measured  by  such  means  as  standard  electrode  or 
ionization  potential.  This  conclusion  has  been  subjected  to 
extensive  criticism.  Geraldson  (27)  explained  the  occurrence 
of  blossom-end  rot  of  tomatoes  as  a  calcium  deficiency  when 
the  plants  were  grown  in  high  concentrations  of  soluble  salts 
on  the  basis  that  as  the  soluble  salt  concentrations  Increase, 
the  relative  activities  (effective  concentration)  of  the 
divalent  salts  decrease  at  a  more  rapid  rate  than  monovalent 
salts.  Also,  the  calcium  to  soil  soluble  salts  ratic   (actual 


15 
concentration)  varies  inversely  with  concentration. 

Shear,  Crane,  and  Meyers  (69)  working  with  young 
tung  nut  trees  found  that  Increasing  the  magnesium  or  potas- 
sium in  the  substrate  generally  resulted  in  increased  con- 
centrations in  the  tissue;  however,  the  total  accumulation 
of  potassium* magnesium* calcium  was  generally  decreased. 
Moreover,  increasing  calcium  in  the  substrate  not  only  in- 
creased the  calcium  in  the  tissue  but  also  increased  the 
total  accumulation  of  the  three  cations.  This  was  explained 
on  the  basis  that  since  a  large  percentage  of  the  absorbed 
calcium  in  many  species  is  inactivated  by  oxalate  precipita- 
tion and  no  longer  able  to  affect  the  entrance  of  other 
cations,  the  increased  calcium  accumulation  would  result  In 
an  increasod  total  cation  accumulation.  Pierre  and  Bower 
(59)  pointed  out  that  potassium  absorption  Is  usually  de- 
creased in  the  presence  of  high  concentrations  of  other 
cations  such  as  calcium  and  magnesium.   However,  under  rela- 
tively high  levels  of  potassium, increasing  the  concentration 
of  other  cations,  especially  calcium,  may  increase  potassium 
absorption  and  accumulation  in  many  crops.  After  a  critical 
literature  review  Peech  and  Bradfield  (58)  concluded  that  the 
addition  of  lime  to  soils  may  have  no  effect,  may  Increase, 
or  decrease  the  availability  of  potassium  to  plants  depending 
upon  the  degree  of  initial  soil  saturation.  They  indicated 
that  calcium  may  have  little  effect  on  the  absorption  of  the 
available  potassium,  at  least  at  the  concentrations  found  in 
most  soils.  Meanwhile,  Geraldson  (26)  indicated  that  the 


16 
application  of  excessive  amounts  of  ammonium,  potassium, 
magnesium,  or  sodium  to  sandy  soils  of  Florida  limited  the 
uptake  of  calcium  by  tomatoes. 

Reports  on  the  specific  cation  nutrition  of  cucurbits, 
especially  watermelons,  are  limited.  Bradley  and  Fleming 
(10)  observed  that  the  potassium  content  of  watermelon  leaves 
was  influenced  primarily  by  the  addition  of  potassium  to  the 
soil.  The  difference  in  potassium  content  of  the  leaves  be- 
tween treatments  grew  smaller  as  the  season  progressed.  The 
application  of  60  pounds  of  potassium  in  the  row  significantly 
reduced  the  calcium  content  of  the  watermelon  leaves  early 
in  the  season  but  had  no  effect  toward  the  end  of  the  season. 
In  one  of  two  seasons  potassium  applications  significantly 
reduced  the  magnesium  content  of  the  leaves  early  in  the 
season  but  had  no  effect  on  samples  collected  toward  the  end 
of  the  growing  season. 

Sharpies  and  Foster  (66)  grew  cantaloupes  In  Arizona 
desert  sand  cultures  with  calcium  saturation  percentages  of 
2.9,  11.9,  36.2,  63.7,  72.5,  and  86.6.  They  found  that  ex- 
tremely high  and  low  saturation  percentages  tended  to  restrict 
potassium  uptake  while  leaf  calcium  varied  directly  and  mag- 
nesium Inversely  with  the  calcium  saturation  percentages. 
Stark  and  Haut  (72)  reported  that  the  calcium  content  of 
cantaloupe  leaves  increased  in  a  geometric  proportion  to  the 
calcium  concentration  in  the  substrate,  while  potassium  and 
magnesium  increased  in  arithmetic  proportions  to  the  concen- 
tration of  these  respective  elements  in  the  substrate. 


17 
Concentrations  of  4  to  5  mllliequlvalents  per  liter  (200- 
300  ppra)  appeared  to  produce  the  best  growth.  When  calcium 
was  supplied  at  4,  8,  or  16  milliequivalents  (80,  160,  220 
ppm),  Reynolds  and  Stark  (62)  obtained  maximum  top,  root, 
and  fruit  yields  of  cucumbers  at  the  lowest  calcium  level, 
and  growth  decreased  as  the  calcium  level  increased. 

Effects  oX  nitrogen  on  the.  cation  content 

It  has  been  established  that  not  only  the  concentra- 
tion of  nitrogen  in  the  substrate  but  also  the  source 
(nitrate  or  ammonium)  will  have  a  profound  effect  on  the 
cation  content  of  the  tissue  (3,  13,  48,  63,  67,  84). 

It  has  been  shown  repeatedly  that  increasing  the 
proportion  of  nitrate  to  ammonium  nitrogen  in  the  substrate 
increases  the  production  of  organic  acids,  especially  oxalic 
(13).  Since  oxalic  acid  precipitates  much  of  the  absorbed 
calcium,  plants  growing  under  high  nitrate  levels  may  uti- 
lize more  calcium  (3,  13,  48,  63,  67,  68). 

Shear  and  co-workers  (67,  68,  69),  Gerald son  (26), 
and  Burrus  (13)  pointed  out  that  the  activity  of  the  ammonium 
ion  is  very  similar  to  the  activity  of  the  potassium  ion  and 
will  greatly  affect  the  uptake  of  other  cations.  Shear  and 
Crane  (67),  by  supplying  the  nitrogen  as  ammonium  in  contrast 
to  nitrate,  reduced  the  cation  content  of  tung  leaves  by  the 
following  percentages:   potassium— 18  per  cent,  magnesium — 
25  per  cent,  and  calcium— 46  per  cent. 

Bradley  and  Fleming  (10)  indicated  that  the  soil 


18 
application  of  ammonium  nitrate  had  no  consistent  effect  on 
the  potassium,  calcium,  and  magnesium  content  of  watermelon 
leaves.  Sharpies  and  Foster  (66)  reported  that  the  applica- 
tion of  ammonium  nitrate  in  sand  cultures  of  cantaloupes 
significantly  increased  the  potassium,  calcium,  and  magnesium 
content  of  the  leaves  and  decreased  the  phosphorus  content 
under  varying  calcium  and  magnesium  ratios. 

Distribution  o£  cations  in.  plants 

Numerous  studies  have  been  conducted  on  the  distri- 
bution of  cations  in  plant  tissue  employing  both  chemical 
analyses  and  radio-isotopes  (3,  7,  31,  43,  63).  The  follow- 
ing generalizations  may  be  drawn:   (1)  a  large  part  of  the 
calcium  is  located  in  the  leaves  with  considerably  smaller 
amounts  occurring  in  the  roots,  stem,  seeds,  and  meriste- 
matic  areas,  (2)  potassium  is  distributed  more  uniformly 
throughout  the  plant  than  calcium  with  relatively  large 
quantities  occurring  in  regions  of  merlstematic  division, 
translocation,  and  storage,  and  (3)  magnesium  is  present  in 
somewhat  smaller  amounts  than  calcium  or  potassium  with 
relatively  large  concentrations  occurring  in  the  leaves  and 
in  the  seeds  of  some  plants. 

Hardh  (31)  showed  with  radiographs  that  calcium  ac- 
cumulates in  cucumbers  in  clearly  separated  pits  occurring 
more  frequently  in  the  leaves  than  in  the  stems.  Wilklns 
(83)  reported  that  cucurbit  vines,  namely,  pumpkins,  pre- 
serving citrons,  two  types  of  squash,  cucumbers,  and  canta- 
loupes, contained  large  amounts  of  calcium  ranging  from  5 


19 
to  8.5  per  cent  calcium  oxide,  while  the  fruits  at  no  time 
contained  over  0.75  per  cent  calcium  oxide.  The  vines  con- 
tained up  to  5.9  per  cent  potassium  oxide  and  the  fruit  up 
to  5.4  per  cent  depending  upon  the  species.  The  magnesium 
content  of  the  vines  was  much  less  variable,  ranging  from 
0.46  per  cent  to  1.30  per  cent  magnesium  oxide,  and  the 
fruit  consistently  contained  even  less  magnesium  than  cal- 
cium. Wilklns  (83)  also  found  an  increase  in  the  percentage 
of  calcium  in  the  cucurbit  vines  toward  maturity,  and  the 
calcium  content  of  the  fruit  decreased  slightly  toward  ma- 
turity. The  opposite  trends  were  true  for  both  potassium 
and  magnesium. 


METHODS  AND  PROCEDURES 

The  watermelon  industry  in  North  Central  Florida  was 
surveyed  by  making  field  observations  and  soil  analyses  in 
30  melon  fields  during  the  1958  growing  season.  This  aided 
in  familiarization  with  the  fertility  problems  involved  in 
watermelon  production. 

The  literature  indicated  that  certain  physiological 
disorders  of  watermelons  resulted  from  adverse  chemical  or 
physical  conditions  of  the  soil.  Therefore,  profile  exami- 
nations were  made  and  soil  samples  were  obtained  from  plots 
devoted  to  watermelon  fertility  experiments  as  described  by 
Nettles  and  Halsey  (53)  in  the  spring  of  1953.  Chemical 
analyses  of  the  soil  samples  were  made  to  observe  any  pos- 
sible correlation  between  the  chemical  constituents  and  the 
presence  of  blossom-end  rot. 

In  the  spring  of  1958  samples  of  watermelon  tissue 
were  obtained  from  mature  field-grown  plants  to  determine 
the  distribution  of  calcium,  potassium,  magnesium,  and 
sodium  in  the  various  plant  parts  and  the  variation  of  these 
elements  from  plant  to  plant.  The  samples  for  analyses  were 
taken  from  six  plants  grown  under  similar  environmental  con- 
ditions and  were  bearing  mature  fruits.  Samples  for  analyses 
from  each  plant  included  the  following  locations:  basal 
leaves,  mid-leaves,  vine  tips,  basal  stem,  mid-stem,  and  fruit, 

20 


21 
Bach  tissue  sample  was  analyzed  for  calcium,  potassium, 
magnesium,  and  sodium  on  the  Beckman  model  DU  flame  spectro- 
photometer by  using  procedures  outlined  by  Breland  (12) • 
In  order  to  evaluate  the  effect  of  interfering  anions  in 
the  watermelon  tissue  on  the  calcium  determinations,  each 
sample  was  analyzed  for  calcium,  with  and  without  these  ions 
present.  The  method  of  removing  the  interfering  anions  from 
the  samples  is  given  under  the  heading  "Chemical  Analyses •" 

Preliminary  experiments  with  nutrient  solutions  and 
quartz  sand  were  conducted  to  determine  the  feasibility  of 
these  techniques  for  greenhouse  culture  of  watermelons. 

In  addition  to  the  major  study  reported  below, 
simultaneous  exploratory  work  was  conducted  in  the  greenhouse 
and  field  to  observe  the  effects  of  foliar  applications  of 
calcium  chloride  on  watermelons.  Plants  grown  in  field  soil 
in  greenhouse  benches  were  sprayed  with  0.25,  0.10,  0.08, 
0.06,  and  0.04  molar  concentrations  of  calcium  chloride  to 
determine  optimum  levels  for  foliar  applications.  Severe 
leaf  burning  occurred  at  the  0.25  level  and  slight  burning 
was  evident  at  the  0.10  molar  concentration.  The  0.04  through 
0.08  molar  levels  appeared  satisfactory  for  treatment.  A 
greenhouse  sand  culture  experiment  with  8  replications  was 
established  to  observe  the  effects  of  bi-weekly  applications 
of  0.04  molar  calcium  chloride  spray  versus  no  spray  on  the 
watermelon  plants.  Adequate  amounts  of  a  basic  nutrient  solu- 
tion containing  16  ppm  calcium  was  supplied  to  each  pot.  A 
field  experiment  containing  three  levels  of  a  calcium  chloride 


22 
foliar  spray  arranged  in  a  randomized  block  design  was  con- 
ducted during  the  1959  season*  The  spray  levels  were  no 
spray,  0.04,  and  0.08  molar  concentrations  of  calcium  chloride 
applied  every  five  days. 

The  major  study  consisted  of  two  parts—a  greenhouse 
phase  and  a  field  phase.  The  greenhouse  phase  was  organized 
to  study  the  effects  of  various  calcium  levels  in  nutrient 
solutions  on  growth  responses;  sex  expression;  fruit  set  and 
quality;  and  the  accumulation  of  calcium,  potassium,  and 
magnesium  in  the  various  plant  parts.  The  field  phase  was 
designed  to  investigate  the  effects  of  three  levels  of  nitro- 
gen and  three  levels  of  calcium  on  growth,  yield,  quality, 
and  cation  composition  of  the  watermelon  plant.  The  Charles- 
ton Gray  variety  of  watermelons  was  used  in  all  experiments. 

Greenhou.se  phage 
A  randomized  block  experiment  with  four  replications 
was  initiated  on  April  15,  1959,  to  study  the  influence  of 
eight  progressive  levels  of  calcium  on  watermelon  responses. 
This  test  was  conducted  using  a  solution  culture  procedure 
in  which  the  calcium  levels  were  supplied  by  the  addition  of 
calcium  chloride  to  a  basic  nutrient  solution.  Young  water- 
melon seedlings  were  produced  by  germinating  seeds  on  wet 
filter  paper.  Two  of  these  seedlings  constituted  an  experi- 
mental unit  when  suspended  by  a  wooden  support  in  a  four- 
gallon  glazed  crook.  The  solution  levels  in  the  crooks  were 
maintained  at  13  liters  by  dally  application  of  deionlzed 


23 
water  with  a  complete  change  of  solution  each  week.  Ade- 
quate aeration  was  supplied  to  each  crock  by  means  of  a 
centrally  located  pump. 

The  concentration  of  calcium  in  the  different  treat- 
ments is  given  in  Table  1.  Since  it  was  necessary  to  use 
large  volumes  of  solutions,  the  concentration  is  given  in 
both  parts  per  million (ppm)  and  milliequivalents  per  liter 
(m.e./L) . 

TABLE  1 
CALCIUM  LEVELS  IN  GREENHOUSE  SOLUTION  CULTURES 


Greenhouse  Treatment  Calcium  Calcium 

Number  PP*  m.e./L 


1 

0 

2 

4 

3 

8 

4 

16 

5 

32 

6 

64 

7 

128 

8 

256 

0.0 
0.2 
0.4 
0.8 
1.6 
3.2 
6.4 
12.8 


The  composition  of  the  basic  nutrient  solution  is 
shown  in  Table  2.  The  iron  solution  was  prepared  by  dis- 
solving 100  grams  of  sodium-iron  versenol  (12  per  cent  iron) 
per  2.5  liters  of  deionized  water,  and  l/lO  millileter  of 
this  solution  was  used  per  liter  of  nutrient  solution.  The 
other  elements  were  prepared  by  the  procedure  outlined  by 
Hoagland  and  Arnon  (37). 

The  pH  of  all  newly  prepared  solutions,  regardless 
of  calcium  level,  was  approximately  5.2.  At  the  end  of  the 


24 
seven-day  period,  the  pH  of  the  solutions  ranged  from  6.0  to 
6.8  depending  on  the  size  of  the  vines;  therefore,  no  pH 
adjustments  were  necessary. 

TABLE  2 

THE  COMPOSITION  OF  THE  BASIC  NUTRIENT  SOLUTION 
FOR  GREENHOUSE  EXPERIMENT 


Element 

Source 

Concentration 

(ppm) 

Nitrogen 

KN03 

70 

Phosphorus 

KH2po4 
KNO^oPO. 

MgS04 

32 

Potassium 

234 

Magnesium 

48 

Boron 

H3BO3 

0.5 

Manganese 

MnCl2 

0.5 

Iron 

NaFeEIiTA 

0.5 

Molybdium 

H2M0O4 

0.05 

Zinc 

ZnS04 

0.05 

Copper 

CuS04 

0.02 

Fifteen  days  after  transplanting  one  plant  per  pot 
was  harvested  and  dry  weights  were  obtained  as  an  early 
growth  measurement.  All  flowers  were  hand -pollinated  in 
the  early  morning  and  the  number  of  both  pistillate  and 
starainate  flowers  produced  per  experimental  unit  was  re- 
corded daily.  All  fruits  developed  blossom-end  rot  In  this 
experiment  and  were  harvested  individually  and  oven-dried  as 
soon  as  the  rot  was  obvious.  Continuous  records  on  growth 
responses  were  maintained  throughout  the  experiments. 

The  experiment  ended  June  15  and  the  following  ob- 
tained from  each  experimental  unit:   leaf,  tip,  and  root 
samples  and  dry  weight  of  frul  ,  roots,  and  vines.   The  leaf 


25 
samples  were  composed  of  eight  mature  leaves  per  plant.  The 
tip  samples  were  composed  of  eight  actively  growing  lateral 
tips  two  Inches  in  length.  The  root  samples  were  composed 
of  the  entire  root  system  from  each  experimental  unit.  All 
tissue  samples  vere   washed  twice  in  delonized  water  before 
drying,  with  each  washing  lasting  approximately  10  seconds. 

FJL£ld  Phase 

UeBcrjpUftP  pX  soil  type  and  soil  test 

The  area  used  in  this  experiment  was  located  on  the 
Horticulture  Unit  of  the  University  of  Florida  near  Gaines- 
ville, Florida.   The  soil  was  classified  as  Kanapaha  fine 
sand  (2).  The  surface  layer  is  medium  gray,  loose,  acid, 
fine  sand  and  underlain  by  yellowish  white,  loose,  strongly 
acid,  fine  sand.   This  is  underlain  by  a  phosphatic  lime 
material.  Kanapaha  fine  sand  is  relatively  low  in  organic 
matter,  moderately  to  imperfectly  drained,  level  to  slightly 
undulating  with  poor  physical  structure,  and  often  located 
near  ponds  or  lakes. 

Two  soil  samples  were  taken  from  each  plot  on  April 
1.   One  sample  was  taken  in  the  bed  and  consisted  of  5  cores 
taken  at  four  locations  across  the  bed.  The  other  sample 
was  taken  from  the  calcium-treated  area  on  each  side  of  the 
bed  and  consisted  of  20  cores.   The  samples  were  analyzed  for 
available  Ca0,  MgO,  K20,  P205,  N03,  and  PH  by  the  University 
of  Florida  Soil  Testing  Laboratory. 


26 
Field  methods 

An  experiment  containing  three  levels  of  calcium  and 
three  levels  of  nitrogen  arranged  factorially  in  a  balanced- 
lattice  design  was  conducted  in  the  spring  of  1959  on  Kanapaha 
fine  sand.   The  calcium  levels  tested  were  at  the  rate  of 
0,  500,  and  1,000  pounds  of  hydrated  lime  (Ca(0H)2)per  acre. 
The  nitrogen  levels  tested  were  at  the  rate  of  60,  120,  and 
180  pounds  per  acre  applied  as  ammonium  nitrate.  The  indi- 
vidual plot  size  was  15  by  80  feet  with  each  calcium  treat- 
ment being  broadcast  in  a  10-foot  band  throughout  the  length 
of  each  plot  on  February  20.  This  left  an  untreated  area  of 
2.5  feet  on  both  sides  of  each  plot.  An  untreated  area  of 
10  feet  was  left  between  the  ends  of  the  plots  to  serve  as 
a  buffer  area. 

A  single  bed  approximately  8  inches  high  and  18 
inches  wide  was  prepared  in  the  center  of  each  plot.  One 
half  of  the  total  nitrogen  and  a  uniform  application  of  80 
pounds  of  P^Og  and  80  pounds  of  KgO  per  acre  was  placed  in 
two  bands  in  the  row  on  March  12.  The  remaining  half  of  the 
nitrogen  was  plowed  into  both  sides  of  the  bed  May  1,  when 
the  vines  began  to  develop. 

Sixteen  hills  of  watermelons  were  planted  per  plot 
on  March  26,  and  an  excellent  stand  of  plants  was  obtained. 
Two  weeks  after  emergence  the  melons  were  thinned  to  two 
plants  per  hill.  The  methods  used  for  cultivation.  Insect, 
and  disease  control  were  in  accordance  with  recommended  prac- 
tices for  the  North  Central  Florida  area.  The  melons  were 


27 
harvested  four  times  (June  17,  22,  26,  and  July  3)  and  the 
following  data  obtained  on  all  fruits  from  each  plot:   number 
and  weight  of  early  marketable  yield;  number  and  weight  of 
total  marketable  yield;  mean  thickness  of  rind  of  each  fruit 
measured  at  the  top  center  and  bottom  center;  thickness  of 
rind  at  blossom-end;  percentage  soluble  solids;  percentage 
blossom-end  rot;  and  cutting  quality  including  data  on  hollow- 
heart,  white-heart,  and  other  abnormalities.  The  first  three 
harvests  were  considered  to  represent  the  early  yield,  and 
all  normally  shaped  melons  over  16  pounds  in  weight  were  con- 
sidered as  U.  S.  number  1.  Soluble  solids  were  determined 
on  a  Carl  Zeiss  water-cooled  refractometer. 

The  amount  of  rainfall  recorded  in  the  immediate  area 
of  the  experiment  is  presented  in  Table  3. 

TABLE  3 

TOTAL  BI-MONTHLY  RAINFALL  RECORDED  AT  THE  HORTICULTURE 
UNIT  MARCH  1  TO  JUNE  30,  1959 


Date  Inches  of  rain 


March  1-14  3  22 

March  15-31  o *£? 

April  1-14  ?*£1 

»:u  \5;l°  2:0? 

May   1-14  0  70 

May   15-31  §*™ 

June  1-14  f'K 

June  15-30  2  32 


Total  25.51 


28 
Since  there  was  an  extremely  large  amount  of  rain- 
fall following  the  first  fertilizer  application  early  in 
March,  an  attempt  was  made  to  estimate  the  fertilizer  loss 
from  the  upper  8  inches  of  soil  as  a  result  of  more  than  8 
Inches  of  rain.  An  extra  row  was  fertilized  on  April  1  at 
the  rate  of  90  pounds  of  nitrogen  and  80  pounds  each  of 
p2°5  and  K2°  per  acre«  This  was  located  beside  a  row  which 
received  the  same  fertilizer  treatments  before  the  rains. 
Six  soil  samples  were  taken  on  April  1  from  each  of  these 
two  rows,  as  well  as  from  a  third  row  receiving  no  fertilizer, 
and  analyzed  for  CaO,  MgO,  P205,  *20'  N03»  and  PH* 

TlPPue  sample? 

On  May  1,  just  prior  to  the  second  application  of 
nitrogen,  every  other  hill  of  the  young  watermelon  plants 
from  each  plot  was  harvested  and  pooled  into  one  composite 
sample,  and  the  oven-dry  weight  was  obtained.  Prior  to  dry- 
ing, tip  and  leaf  samples  were  taken  from  each  composite 
sample  for  chemical  analyses.  Additional  leaf  and  tip  sam- 
ples were  obtained  from  each  plot  for  chemical  analyses  one 
week  prior  to  the  first  harvest  of  fruit.  At  this  time  the 
plants  were  in  a  vigorous  state  of  growth  with  little  ap- 
parent disease  or  insect  damage.  The  leaf  sample  from  each 
plot  was  composed  of  the  first  two  normal  leaves,  including 
the  petiole,  from  each  plant.  The  tip  samples  consisted  of 
four  actively  growing  vine  tips  from  each  plant  located  in 
each  plot.  These  tips  were  2  Inches  in  length  and  included 


29 
very  young  leaves  and  a  email  end  portion  of  the  stem.  The 
leaf  and  tip  samples  were  oven-dried  and  stored. 

The  fruits  exhibiting  blossom-end  rot  were  removed 
from  the  vines  at  the  beginning  of  the  harvest  period  and 
a  composite  fruit  sample  was  obtained  from  six  representa- 
tive fruits  from  each  plot.   Three  cores,  one  inch  in  dia- 
meter, were  taken  through  the  center  of  each  fruit  by  use 
of  a  soil  sampling  tube.  These  cores  were  then  cut  into 
sections  one-half  inch  long  and  mixed  thoroughly;  after 
which,  four  90-gram  subsamples  were  weighed  from  each  plot 
sample.  Two  of  these  were  frozen  at  0°  F.  for  subsequent 
chemical  analyses.  The  remaining  two  samples  were  used  for 
moisture  determinations.  Similar  subsamples  for  analyses 
were  obtained  from  the  first  six  normal  fruits  harvested 
from  each  plot. 

Chemical  Analyses 
All  tissue  samples  were  dried  in  a  forced  air  oven 
for  48  hours  at  70°C.  After  which  all  leaf,  tip,  root,  and 
greenhouse  fruit  samples  were  ground  in  a  Wiley  Mill  and 
stored  in  one-pound  paper  bags.   One-gram  samples  of  the 
oven  dried  tissue  were  ashed  in  a  muffle  furnace  at  450°C, 
dissolved  in  15  milliliters  (ml.)  of  40  per  cent  hydrochloric 
acid  (HC1),  evaporated  to  dryness,  reheated  in  the  muffle 
furnace  at  450°C.  for  30  minutes  to  3  hours  (depending  on  the 
amount  of  black  carbon  present),  dissolved  in  1  ml.  of 


30 
concentrated  HC1,  evaporated  to  dryness,  and  diluted  to 
volume  with  0.1  normal  HC1. 

Fruit  samples  collected  from  the  field  experiment 
were  dried  in  250  ml.  beakers  and  ashed  in  the  same  manner 
as  the  other  tissue  samples.  The  entire  sample  was  ashed 
and  calculations  were  based  on  the  oven  dry  weight  of  the 
sample  less  beaker  weight. 

All  samples  were  analyzed  for  potassium,  calcium, 
and  magnesium  on  a  Beckman  model  DU  flame  spectrophotometer 
following  the  procedure  outlined  by  Breland  (12) •  Before 
the  calcium  and  magnesium  determinations  were  made,  10  ml. 
aliquots  of  each  sample  were  passed  through  a  six-inch  column 
of  anion  exchange  resin  (Dowex  1-8X,  50-100  mesh,  medium 
porosity)  to  remove  interfering  anions  (39) . 

Statistical  Methods 
The  data  were  analyzed  by  the  analysis  of  variance 
methods  described  by  Cochran  and  Cox  (15) .  Probability 
statements  of  comparisons  among  means  are  based  on  the 
Duncan  Multiple  Range  Test  (19) •  Count  data  were  trans- 
formed by  the  square  root  method  and  percentage  data  by  the 
arcsin  transformation  before  statistical  analyses  were  made. 
All  growth  response  data  presented  from  the  field  experiment 
were  derived  from  the  adjusted  treatment  totals  of  the 
balanced-lattice  design. 


RESULTS  OF  EXPERIMENTS 

Examination  of  soil  test  data  obtained  from  the  field 
survey  indicated  that,  in  general,  low  yields  and  a  high  per- 
centage of  blossom-end  rot  were  associated  with  low  nutrient 
levels,  especially  calcium  and  magnesium. 

Data  obtained  from  fruit  counts  and  soil  studies  from 
fertility  experiments  described  by  Nettles  and  Halsey  (53) 
revealed  that  significant  differences  in  the  percentage  of 
blossom-end  rot  could  not  be  attributed  to  fertility  treat- 
ments of  differential  levels  of  available  soil  nutrients. 
In  two  of  the  three  fertility  experiments  significant  dif- 
ferences in  the  percentage  of  blossom-end  rot  did  result 
from  replications.  Further  examination  of  the  data  showed 
that  in  one  of  the  experiments  the  percentage  of  blossom- 
end  rot  decreased  significantly  from  the  higher  to  the  lower 
elevation  of  the  field.  Examination  of  the  soil  profile  re- 
vealed that  the  soil  in  the  upper  portion  of  the  field  was 
slightly  compact  for  the  first  18  inches  then  was  very  loose 
to  a  depth  of  over  6  feet.  The  compactness  of  this  upper 
portion  of  the  soil  decreased  from  the  higher  to  the  lower 
elevation  of  the  field.  From  field  examination  of  the  pro- 
file, at  the  lower  elevation  the  soil  appeared  to  have  a 
more  desirable  texture,  more  organic  matter,  and  was  darker 
in  color.   Examination  of  the  data  from  a  second  experiment 

31 


32 
indicated  that  replications  located  on  a  soil  with  a  loose 
porous  profile  produced  significantly  more  blossom-end  rot 
than  replications  located  on  a  soil  with  a  hard-pan  12  to 
24  inches  below  the  surface.   In  the  third  experiment  no 
significant  differences  resulted  from  replications.  Examina- 
tion of  this  soil  profile  revealed  a  uniform,  relatively  loose 
profile  with  no  observable  textural  or  structural  differences 
throughout  the  experimental  area. 

The  distribution  of  calcium,  potassium,  magnesium, 
and  sodium  in  the  various  parts  of  mature  watermelon  plants 
grown  under  similar  environmental  conditions  during  the 
spring  of  1958  is  shown  in  Table  4.  By  passing  the  sample 
solutions  through  an  anion  exchange  resin,  calcium  determi- 
nation values  were,  in  general,  from  20  to  35  per  cent  greater 
than  those  obtained  from  samples  in  which  this  step  was  elimi- 
nated. The  greatest  concentration  of  calcium,  irrespective 
of  analytical  methods,  and  of  magnesium  occurred  in  the  older 
leaves  with  the  percentages  decreasing  at  the  various  sampling 
locations  in  the  following  order:  basal  leaves,  mid-leaves, 
tips,  stems,  and  fruits. 

Statistical  comparisons  of  the  percentage  of  potassium, 
calcium,  and  magnesium  present  at  different  locations  in  the 
plants  are  shown  in  Table  5.   The  concentration  of  potassium 
was  significantly  less  in  the  leaves  than  in  other  plant  parts 
with  the  largest  concentrations  occurring  in  the  stems  and 
fruits.  There  was  no  significant  difference  between  the  cal- 
cium content  of  the  stem  sampling  positions;  however,  the 


33 


as 

55 


o  w  ■<*»  ^  oo  ev» 
'i*  co  n  cm  co  co 
o     ©     ©     o     o     o 


if 


00       o 
H        © 


© 


© 

© 


« 


oo 


00 


to 

CO 


9 


a) 
o 


CM 

o 


n 

o 


lO 

© 


5 


n      ih 


tO 


CM 


CM 

© 

cm 


n 

c 
o 

«H 

■*» 

a 

© 
o 


00 
© 

> 

a 
© 


05 
00 


00 

© 
> 
ft 

f-t 
I 


a- 


© 

09 


Ol 

K 

« 


© 


© 
CM 


oo 


oo 


CM      CM      CM      eM 


I    3 


10        H       i-4 

CO        ©        M 


■ 
I 


00 
•♦» 

2 

u 

9 

u 

3 

0) 


I 

c 
© 

> 

e 
© 

♦» 

a 
o 

09 

c 
e 

«H 

■*> 
a) 


« 

© 

M 

*4 

0B 

O 
© 

M 
a) 

fc. 
© 
> 


• 
M 

al 

■♦» 
C 
© 
a 
h 

p. 

xi  • 
o  » 
OjiH 
CC  » 
al     a) 

« 

■H 
© 

s 


34 
calcluci  percentages  of  all  other  sampling  locations  within 

the  plant  vere   significantly  different  from  each  other.  This 

was  true  for  the  samples  passed  through  the  anion  exchange 

columns  as  well  as  for  those  not  passed  through  the  columns. 

The  magnesium  content  of  the  sampling  positions  in  the  stems 

did  not  differ  significantly;  however,  the  magnesium  content 

of  all  other  sampling  locations  within  the  plants  differed 

significantly. 


TABLE  6 

TEST  OF  SIGNIFICANCE  FOR  THE  PERCENTAGE  OF  POTASSIUM, 
CALCIUM,  ANU  MAGNESIUM  AT  SIX  LOCATIONS 
WITHIN  MATURE  WATERMELON  PLANTSa 


Potassium  percentage 

Mid- 
Locations  leaves 

Basal           Basal   Mature 
leaves   Tips   stem    fruits 

Mid- 
stem 

Calcium  and  magnesium 

Mature 
Locations  fruit 

Mid-     Basal         Mid- 
stem     stems  Tips    leaves 

Basal 
leaves 

Any  two  locations  underlined  by  the  same  line  were 
not  significantly  different.  Any  two  locations  not  under- 
lined by  the  same  line  were  significantly  different  at  the 
5  per  cent  level  (See  Table  33  for  A.O.V.). 

^Significance  table  for  calcium  analyses  both  with 
and  without  anion  exchange  resins. 


35 
There  was  far  greater  variation  in  the  sodium  con- 
tent from  one  plant  to  another  than  from  sampling  locations 
within  any  one  plant;  consequently,  sodium  analyses  were 
eliminated  in  later  work. 

Results  from  exploratory  foliar  spray  experiments 
were  Inconclusive.  Vine  growth  in  the  greenhouse  was  not 
affected  by  foliar  application  of  0.04  molar  calcium  chlo- 
ride. When  each  plant  was  allowed  to  set  one  fruit ,  all 
eight  of  the  vines  receiving  no  spray  produced  fruits  with 
obvious  blossom-end  rot.  Two  of  the  eight  plants  receiving 
bi-weekly  sprays  of  0.04  molar  calcium  chloride  produced 
fruit  with  obvious  blossom-end  rot.  The  remaining  six  plants 
produced  fruits  with  no  external  symptoms  of  rot;  however, 
examination  of  the  internal  tissues  revealed  that  three  of 
the  fruits  had  a  semi-dehydrated,  whitish,  leathery  type  of 
tissue  at  the  blossom-end.  There  were  no  significant  dif- 
ferences in  vine  growth,  yield,  or  percentage  of  blossom- 
end  rot  obtained  from  the  foliar  spray  treatments  of  the 
field  experiment.   However,  it  should  be  pointed  out  that 
the  plants  in  this  experiment  were  injured  considerably  by 
excessive  rains. 

frreenhou.se  Phase 

Growth  responses 

All  plants  grown  in  solutions  void  of  calcium  became 
stunted,  chlorotlc  and  all  but  one  plant  died  within  two 


36 
weeks  after  transplanting.  One  plant  per  experimental  unit 
was  harvested  from  the  seven  remaining  treatments  18  days 
after  transplanting.  The  analysis  of  variance  of  the  data 
revealed  no  significant  differences  In  the  dry  weights  of 
root 8  or  tops. 

Slight  calcium  deficiency  symptoms  became  apparent 
on  newly  developing  leaves  of  plants  grown  in  4  ppm  calcium 
(treatment  2)  on  May  8.  By  May  15,  these  deficiency  symptoms 
were  very  pronounced  In  both  the  tops  and  the  roots,  and  the 
symptoms  became  increasingly  more  severe  as  the  season  prog- 
ressed. The  leaves  of  deficient  plants  were  dark  green  in 
color,  moderately  cupped  under  at  the  margins,  and  severely 
restricted  especially  at  the  apex  forming  a  more  circular 
type  leaf  (Fig.  1,  No.  2). 

The  vine  laterals  of  plants  in  treatment  2  were 
shorter  and  much  more  numerous  than  those  of  the  other  treat- 
ments. Frequently  terminal  growth  of  these  short  laterals 
would  cease  and  more  short  laterals  would  appear  which  would 
in  turn  often  produce  other  short  laterals.  This  type  of 
growth  pattern  suggested  a  retardation  or  cessation  of  the 
activity  of  the  merstimatlc  tissue  at  the  apex  of  each  vine 
lateral.  There  were  no  observable  differences  in  either  vine 
laterals  or  leaf  formation  of  plants  In  treatments  3  through 
8.  However,  the  leaves  of  treatments  7  and  8  were  lighter 
green  in  color  and  appeared  to  be  smaller  In  size  (Fig.  1). 

The  root  systems  of  plants  grown  in  treatment  2 
exhibited  a  growth  pattern  similar  to  the  vine  laterals  with 


Fig.  1. — The  twelfth  leaf  from  the 
base  of  the  plants  in  treatments  2,   3,  4, 
7,   and  8  of  the  greenhouse  experiment. 
Treatments  5  and  6  were  eliminated  to  con- 
serve space,  because  they  did  not  appear  to 
be  different  from  4. 


Br^                 ^k       ^k     JM 

^^L          ^k^           ^L     _^^3 

lit        ' 

^^^9 

^^^^rr^ v  j 

^l 

^■^^ 

39 
the  roots  being  short ,  dense,  Tory  numerous,  and  often  dark 
at  the  apex  Indicating  death  (Fig.  2).   Root  systems  of 
treatment  3  showed  these  symptoms  in  a  very  limited  degree. 
The  root  systems  of  treatments  4  through  8  appeared  to  be 
normal* 

Since  the  calcium  levels  used  in  this  experiment  were 
4,  8,  16,  32,  64,  128,  and  256  ppm,  that  is,  increased  in 
the  ratio  of  2  to  1,  statistical  analyses  and  interpretations 
of  the  data  were  facilitated  by  considering  all  responses  as 
measured  against  the  logarithms  of  the  calcium  concentrations. 
Thus,  in  the  analysis  of  variance  of  all  data  pertaining  to 
the  greenhouse  experiment  and  to  the  discussion  of  linear  and 
non-linear  effects,  the  Independent  variable  is  always  the 
logarithm  of  the  amount  of  calcium  added  to  the  nutrient 
solutions. 

The  dry  weights  of  vines,  roots,  fruits,  and  the 
total  dry  weight  of  plants  are  presented  in  Table  6.  When 
the  vine  growth  was  measured  against  the  Increasing  calcium 
levels,  it  was  found  to  decrease  in  a  highly  significant 
linear  trend,  while  the  root  growth  responded  in  a  signifi- 
cant cubic  fashion.   There  were  no  significant  differences 
in  the  dry  weight  of  the  entire  plants  (vines,  roots,  and 
fruits),  although  it  appeared  to  be  curvilinear.  Statistical 
analysis  was  not  made  on  the  dry  weight  of  the  fruits,  because 
they  were  harvested  whenever  external  blossom-end  rot  became 
evident. 


N^ 


Fig.  2 .—Representative  root  systems 
from  treatments  2,  3,   5,   7,  and  8  of  the  green- 
house experiment.  Treatments  4  and  6  did  not 
appear  to  he  different  from  5. 


42 


TABLE  6 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  TREATMENTS  ON  THE  DRY  WEIGHT 
OF  VINES,  ROOTS,  FRUITS,  AND  TOTAL  WEIGHT 
IN  THE  GREENHOUSE  EXPERIMENT 


Treatment 

Dry  weight  in  grams 

Number 

Ca  Levels 

ppn 

Vines 

Roots 

Fruits 

Total 

2 

4 

79.60 

5.84 

0.00 

85.44 

3 

8 

91.10 

5.80 

1.76 

98.66 

4 

16 

81.60 

5.95 

33.23 

120.79 

5 

32 

61.13 

3.80 

39.84 

104.76 

6 

64 

60.80 

4.12 

26.86 

91.79 

7 

128 

66.82 

3.72 

26.91 

97.45 

8 

256 
Effect :b 

60.05 

5.15 

32.84 

98.16 

Linear 

** 

* 



N.  S. 

Quadratic 

N.  S. 

N.  S. 

___ 

N.  S. 

Cubic 

N.  S. 

* 

___ 

N.  S. 

*  Significant  at  the  0.05  level 
**  Significant  at  the  0.01  level 
N.S.  Not  significant 


aEach  figure  is  the  average  of  four  replications 
measured  in  grams. 

The  linear,  quadratic,  and  cubic  effects  were 
determined  by  using  log  x  as  the  Independent  variable, 
where  x  is  the  concentration  of  calcium  in  ppm  in  the 
nutrient  solution  (see  Table  34  for  A.O.V.) 


Sejt  expression  and  fruit  SSk 

The  number  of  pistillate  and  stamlnate  flowers,  the 
ratio  of  stamlnate  to  pistillate  flowers,  and  the  number  of 
fruits  set  are  given  in  Table  7,  and  the  comparisons  of  the 
square  root  of  the  means  are  given  in  Table  8. 


43 

TABLE  7 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  TREATMENTS  ON  FLOWER  PRODUCTION 
AND  FRUIT  SET  IN  THE  GREENHOUSE  EXPERIMENT 

Treatment       Ave.  No.  of  flowers  produced  Total 

numl 
of  J 
set 


Number   Ca  levels  Staminate  Pistillate  Ratio  number 

ppm  S:P   of  fruits 


2 

4 

155.1 

5.80 

27.79 

0 

3 

8 

247.2 

28.42 

8.74 

1 

4 

16 

182.4 

22.78 

8.16 

9 

5 

33 

119.3 

14.92 

8.10 

11 

6 

64 

152.6 

17.93 

8.54 

12 

7 

128 

184.7 

18.70 

10.21 

11 

8 

256 

155.4 

15.62 

11.68 

12 

Treatment  3  produced  significantly  more  and  treatment 
5  produced  significantly  fever  staminate  flowers  than  any 
other  treatments.  Treatment  2  produced  the  least  number  of 
pistillate  flowers  while  treatment  3  produced  the  largest 
number.  The  ratio  of  staminate  to  pistillate  flowers  was 
significantly  greater  in  treatment  2  than  in  any  of  the  other 
treatments.  No  fruit  was  set  on  plants  in  treatment  2  (4 
ppm  calcium)  and  only  one  fruit  was  set  by  plants  in  treat- 
ment 3  (16  ppm  calcium).  There  were  no  significant  dif- 
ferences in  the  number  of  fruit  set  from  treatments  4 
through  8. 

Almost  all  the  ovaries  produced  by  plants  grown  in 
treatment  2  turned  dark  brown  to  black  in  color  beginning  at 
the  blossom-end,  even  before  the  flower  parts  opened.  This 
also  occurred  rather  frequently  in  the  plants  in  treatment 
3,  but  it  was  not  observed  in  any  of  the  other  treatments. 


44 


TABLE  8 

TEST  OF  SIGNIFICANCE  FOR  THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM 
TREATMENTS  ON  FLOWER  PRODUCTION  IN 
THE  GREENHOUSE  EXPERIMENT 


Staminate  flowers 


Treatment 


Treatment 

Mean  (sq. 
root) 


5 


8 


Mean  (sq.    10.92  12.35  12.45   12.46   13.50   13.59  15.75 
root)  «—__»__—_— «__«-__—_-______---—-_ 


Pistillate  flowers 

2      5      8      6      7      4      3 
2.41    3.86   3.95   4.24   4.32   4.77    5.33 


Ratio  of  staminate  to  pistillate  flowers 


Treatment 


6 


8 


Mean  (sq.     2.85   2.86   2.92   2.96   3.20    3.42   5.27 
root)        


Notes: 

Any  two  means  underlined  by  the  same  line  are  not 
significantly  different.  Any  two  not  underlined  by  the  same 
line  are  significantly  different  at  the  5  per  cent  level 
(see  Table  35  for  the  A.O.V.). 


45 
Chemical  composition 

The  effects  of  varying  levels  of  calcium  in  the  sub- 
strate on  the  percentage  of  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium 
in  the  leaves,  tips,  roots  and  fruits  are  presented  in  Tables 
9  and  10.  Statistical  analyses  revealed  that  as  the  loga- 
rithms of  the  calcium  concentrations  were  Increased  by  equal 
amounts  in  substrate  the  calcium  content  of  the  leaves  in- 
creased in  quadratic  fashion,  the  potassium  content  decreased 
in  a  highly  significant  linear  trend,  and  the  magnesium  con- 
tent decreased  in  a  highly  significant  quadratic  manner. 

The  calcium  content  of  the  plant  tips  increased 
linearly,  the  magnesium  content  decreased  in  a  curvilinear 
fashion,  and  the  potassium  content  was  not  significantly 
affected  by  Increasing  Increments  of  calcium  in  the  nutrient 
solutions • 

As  the  calcium  levels  were  Increased,  the  percentage 
of  calcium  in  the  root  tissue  increased  in  a  highly  signifi- 
cant cubic  manner,  and  both  the  potassium  and  magnesium 
percentages  decreased  linearly. 

Analyses  of  the  fruit  from  treatments  4  through  8 
indicated  that  the  potassium  content  of  the  fruit  was  not  af- 
fected by  varying  the  calcium  concentration  of  the  substrate. 
However,  there  was  a  highly  positive  linear  regression  in 
the  calcium  content  and  a  highly  negative  linear  response  in 
the  magnesium  content  of  the  fruits  when  measured  against 
increasing  calcium  concentrations  in  the  nutrient  solutions. 


46 


TABLE  9 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  TREATMENTS  ON  THE  PERCENTAGE 
OF  CALCIUM,  POTASSIUM,  AND  MAGNESIUM  IN  THE 
LEAVES  AND  TIPS  OF  PLANTS  GROWN 
IN  THE  GREENHOUSE4 


Treatment 

Leaves 

Tips 

Number  2a  levels 

Ca 

K 

Mg 

Ca 

K 

Mg 

(ppm) 

2 

4 

0.32 

5.19 

2.07 

0.088 

4.16 

0.557 

3 

8 

0.48 

4.79 

1.45 

.117 

3.54 

.490 

4 

16 

1.04 

4.14 

1.89 

.270 

3.81 

.603 

5 

32 

3.12 

4.02 

2.06 

.285 

4.04 

.575 

6 

64 

3.90 

3.54 

1.41 

.347 

3.59 

.460 

7 

128 

4.95 

3.72 

0.89 

.303 

3.77 

.345 

8 

256 
Effect:1* 

5.01 

3.36 

0.53 

0.385 

3.76 

0.322 

Linear 

** 

** 

*♦ 

ft* 

N.S. 

♦* 

Quadratic 

N.S. 

N.S. 

** 

N.S. 

N.S. 

*# 

Cubic 

** 

N.S. 

N.S. 

N.S. 

N.S. 

N.S. 

*  Significant  at  0.05  level 
**  Significant  at  0.01  level 
N.S.  Not  significant 


aEach  percentage  is  the  average  of  four  replications 
on  the  dry  weight  basis. 

^Linear,  quadratic,  and  cubic  effects  were  determined 
by  using  log  x  as  the  independent  variable,  where  z  equals 
the  concentration  of  calcium  in  the  nutrient  solution  in  ppm 
(see  Table  36  for  A.O.V.). 


47 

TABLE  10 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  TREATMENTS  ON  THE  PERCENTAGE 
OF  CALCIUM,  POTASSIUM,  AND  MAGNESIUM  IN 
THE  ROOTS  AND  FRUITS  OF  PLANTS 
GROWN  IN  THE  GREENHOUSE* 


Treatment  Roots  Fruits 


•V  umber 

Ca  levels 
(ppm) 

Ca 

K 

M  ■ 

Ca 

K 

IU 

2 

4 

0.19 

5.33 

0.525 

w«« 

■»«•« 

waw 

3 

8 

0.25 

4.92 

.415 

-_- 



... 

4 

16 

0.38 

4.69 

.420 

0.095 

4.87 

0.370 

5 

32 

0.41 

3.80 

.315 

.105 

4.40 

.320 

6 

64 

0.55 

4.01 

.312 

.175 

4.73 

.295 

7 

128 

1.39 

3.79 

.302 

.265 

4.72 

.273 

8 

256 
Effect :b 

4.85 

3.76 

0.253 

0.313 

4.53 

0.235 

Linear 

** 

♦* 

** 

** 

N.S. 

** 

Quadratic 

** 

N.S. 

N.S. 

N.S. 

N.S. 

N.S. 

Cubic 

** 

N.S. 

N.S. 

N.S. 

N.S. 

N.S. 

*  Significant  at  0.05  level. 
**  Significant  at  0.01  level. 
N.S.  Not  significant 


aEach  percentage  is  the  average  of  four  replications 
on  the  dry  weight  basis. 

^Linear,  quadratic,  and  cubic  effects  were  determined 
by  using  log  x  as  the  independent  variable,  where  x  equals 
the  concentration  of  calcium  in  the  nutrient  solution  in 
ppm  (see  Tables  36  and  37  for  A.O.V.). 


48 
E1&2&  Phase 

Soil  tests 

The  results  of  the  analyses  of  soil  samples  taken 
within  the  beds  are  presented  in  Table  11.   In  general,  the 
results  show  good  correlation  with  the  amount  of  hydrated 
lime  applied.   The  variability  within  treatments  may  be 
partially  attributed  to  at  least  two  factors:   (1)  at  the 
time  of  sampling  small  particles  of  hydrated  lime  were  still 
visible  in  some  of  the  soil  samples  and  (2)  replication 
number  3  was  abnormally  high  in  the  various  elements;  this 
tended  to  Increase  the  average  values  of  all  tests  (see 
Appendix  Table  31). 

TABLE  11 

THE  pH  AND  POUNDS  PER  ACRE  OF  AVAILABLE  NUTRIENTS 
OF  SAMPLES  TAKEN  FROM  THE  WATERMELON 
BEDS  ON  APRIL  1,  1959a 

Treatments11     pH     CaO     MgO     P205    K20     N03 

Ca  N         4.9     234     101      93     263     VL 

CagNj 

Ca0N2 

CaiN2 

Ca2N0 
Ca2Nx 
Ca2N2 

aEaoh  value  is  the  average  of  four  replications. 

bCa0-none#  Cal=500#  and  Ca2«l,000  lbs.  of  Ca(0H)2 
per  acre;  No«60,  NjslzO,  and  N2*  180  lbs.  of  N  per  aere. 

"Memedlum,  Lslov,  VLsvery  low. 


5.0 

147 

85 

90 

227 

L 

4.8 

145 

98 

86 

247 

L 

5.3 

373 

73 

77 

226 

L 

5.4 

653 

90 

89 

267 

L 

5.4 

629 

87 

90 

226 

L 

5.8 

1316 

86 

97 

262 

L 

5.8 

1511 

65 

99 

231 

M 

5.8 

1967 

116 

91 

228 

L 

49 
The  data  in  Table  12  are  from  soil  samples  collected 
from  each  side  of  the  bed  within  the  calcium  treated  area* 
There  was  little  difference  in  the  pli  and  calcium  content  of 
the  various  treatments.  This  may  be  explained  by  the  fact 
that  the  beds  were  prepared  following  the  lime  applications 
which  tended  to  concentrate  the  lime  in  the  beds.  The  data 
in  Table  12,  excluding  calcium,  represent  the  native  fertility 
of  the  plots  (see  Appendix  Table  32). 

TABLE  12 

THE  pH  AND  POUNDS  PER  ACRE  OF  AVAILABLE  NUTRIENTS 
OP  SAMPLES  TAKEN  FROM  EACH  SIDE  OF  THE 
MELON  BEDS  ON  APRIL  1,  1959* 


Treatments 


pH 


CaO 


MgO 


P2°5 


V 


HO. 


CaoNo 

Ca^'l 
C*0N2 
CaiN0 

CalNl 

CalN2 
Ca2N0 

CagNj 

Ca2N2 


4.9 

188 

94 

50 

69 

VL 

4.8 

85 

71 

55 

69 

L 

4.8 

94 

93 

51 

77 

VL 

5.0 

94 

58 

49 

58 

L 

5.0 

188 

90 

48 

53 

L 

4.9 

102 

75 

51 

52 

L 

5.0 

154 

62 

52 

49 

L 

5.1 

146 

57 

51 

37 

L 

5.0 

186 

80 

48 

58 

VL 

Each  value  is  the  average  of  four  replications. 


The  effeots  of  heavy  rains  on  the  removal  of  ferti- 
lizer from  the  upper  eight  inches  of  soil  are  shown  in 
Table  13.   It  is  apparent  from  examination  of  the  data  that 
all  of  the  nitrates  and  approximately  50  per  cent  of  the 
KgO  were  leaohed  from  the  upper  eight  Inches  of  the  soil. 


50 
The  excessive  rainfall  had  very  little  effeet  on  the  levels 
of  CaO,  MgO,  and  P205« 

TABLE  13 

THE  INFLUENCE  OF  MORE  THAN  EIGHT  INCHES  OF  RAINFALL  ON 
THE  REMOVAL  OF  FERTILIZER  NUTRIENTS  IN  POUNDS 
PER  ACRE  FROM  THE  UPPER  EIGHT  INCHES 
OF  SOIL  IN  WATERMELON  BEDS* 


Treatments 

pH 

CaO 

MgO 

P2°5 

K20 

N03C 

Fertilizer 
plus  no  rain 

4.8 

109 

86 

80 

426 

VH 

Ferlitizer 
plus  8"  rain 

5.0 

80 

65 

90 

228 

L 

No  fertilizer 
plus  8"  rain 

4.8 

45 

43 

51 

45 

L 

aEach  figure  is  the  average  of  six  determinations. 


bThe  fertilizer  rate  was  90  lbs.  N/acre  as  NH4N03i 
i.  K30/acre  as  KC1,  and  80  lbs.  of  P20K/acre  as  trip] 
tsphate. 

°VH-very  high,  L-low. 


Growth  responses 

The  dry  weight  of  plants  from  eight  hills  per  plot 
harvested  May  1  is  given  in  Table  14.  There  was  a  signifi- 
cant linear  increase  in  dry  weight  as  the  calcium  levels 
were  increased.  Nitrogen  did  not  significantly  affect  early 
vine  growth  or  any  other  growth  response  measured  in  this 
experiment • 

The  number  of  U.  S.  Number  1  watermelons  harvested 
early  is  given  in  Table  15.   There  was  a  highly  significant 


51 


TABLE  14 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  EARLY  VINE 
GROWTH  AS  INDICATED  BY  THE  DRY  WEIGHT 
OF  EIGHT  HILLS  PER  PLOT 


Pounds  of  hydrated 
line  per  acre 

Pounds  of  nitrogen  ner  acre 
60     120      180 

Total 

0 

500 

1,000 

Total 

196.30 
214.05 
208.20 

618.55 

204.00 
206.35 
212.35 

622.70 

193.75 
237.25 
251.50 

682.50 

594.05 
657.65 
672.05 

Effect  (from  A.O.Y.  in  Table  38): 

Calcium  linear-significant  at  0.05  level. 
Nltrogen-not  significant. 


TABLE  15 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  NUMBER 
OF  EARLY  U.  S.  NUMBER  1  WATERMELONS 


Pounds  of  hydrated 
lime  per  acre 

Pounds 
60 

of  nitrozen 
120 

per  acre 
180 

Total 

0 

500 

1,000 

Total 

25 
30 
37 

92 

23 
32 

28 

83 

18 
31 
44 

93 

66 

93 

109 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  38): 

Calcium  linear-singlf leant  at  0.01  level. 
Nitrogen-not  significant. 


52 
linear  Increase  In  the  number  of  early  watermelons  as  a 
result  of  the  calcium  treatments. 

The  total  weight  of  U.  S.  Number  1  watermelons 
which  was  harvested  early  are  presented  in  Table  16.  There 
was  a  significant  linear  increase  in  the  early  yield,  in 
pounds,  as  a  result  of  increasing  increments  of  calcium. 

TABLE  16 

EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  TOTAL  WEIGHT 
IN  POUNDS  OF  U.  S.  NUMBER  1  WATERMELONS 
HARVESTED  EARLY 


Pounds  of  hydra ted 
lime  per  acre 

Pounds 
60 

of  nitroaren  per  acre 
120      180 

Total 

0 

500 

1,000 

Total 

576.4 
765.6 
872.9 

2214.9 

568.3 
725.8 
626.1 

1920.2 

428.6 

779.5 

1148.5 

2356.6 

1573.3 
2270.9 
2647.5 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  38): 

Calcium  linear-significant  at  the  0.05  level. 
Nitrogen-not  significant • 


The  total  number  of  U.  S.  Number  1  watermelons  har- 
vested is  given  in  Table  17.  The  total  number  of  watermelons 
produced  increased  in  a  significant  fashion  in  response  to 
the  calcium  treatments. 

The  total  weight  in  pounds  of  U.  S.  Number  1  water- 
melons, reported  in  Table  18,  increased  in  a  significant 
linear  manner  in  response  to  the  calcium  treatments. 


53 


TABLE  17 

EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  TOTAL 
NUMBER  OF  U.  S.  NUMBER  1  WATERMELONS 


Pounds  of  hydra ted 
lime  per  acre 


Pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre 
60      120      180 


0 

500 

1,000 


Total 


39 

52 
58 

149 


35 
53 
45 

133 


35 

47 
59 

141 


Total 


109 
152 
162 


Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  38): 

Calcium  linear-significant  at  the  0.05  level. 
Nitrogen-not  significant • 


TABLE  18 

EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  TOTAL  WEIGHT 
IN  POUNDS  OF  U.  S.  NUMBER  1  WATERMELONS 


Pounds  of  hydrated 

Pounds  of  nitrogen  ner  acre 

Total 

lime  per  acre 

60 

120 

180 

0 

500 

1,000 

Total 

851.8 
1167.0 
1267.8 

3286.6 

755.4 

1140.4 

938.3 

2834.1 

778.0 
1118.6 
1444.7 

3341.3 

2385.2 
3426.0 
3650.8 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  38): 

Calcium  linear-significant  at  the  0.05  level. 
Nitrogen-not  significant. 


54 
The  average  of  soluble  solids  as  per  cent  sucrose 
of  all  marketable  fruit  from  each  plot  is  reported  in  Table 
19.  The  average  percentage  of  soluble  solids  was  not  sig- 
nificantly affected  by  either  the  nitrogen  or  the  calcium 
treatments. 

TABLE  19 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  AVERAGE 
SOLUBLE  SOLIDS  AS  PER  CENT  SUCROSE  FROM 
ALL  MARKETABLE  MELONS  PER  PLOT 


Pound 8  of  hydrated 
lime  per  acre 

Pounds 
60 

of  nitrogep  per  acre 

120      180 

Mean 

0 

500 

1,000 

Mean 

9.97 
9.78 
9.48 

9.74 

9.65 
9.94 
9.46 

9.68 

10.24 

10.12 

9.72 

10.03 

9.95 
9.95 
9.55 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  39): 
Not  significant. 


The  average  thickness  of  the  rinds  measured  at  the 
top  and  bottom  center  of  all  marketable  fruits  is  shown  in 
Table  20.   The  average  thickness  of  the  rind  at  these  loca- 
tions was  not  affected  significantly  by  any  treatment  com- 
bination. 

The  average  thickness  of  the  rind  at  the  blossom- 
end  of  all  marketable  fruits  per  plot  is  given  in  Table  21. 
A  linear  reduction  in  the  thickness  of  the  rind  at  the 
blossom-end  was  associated  with  Increasing  increments  of 
calcium. 


55 


TABLE  20 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  AVERAGE 
THICKNESS  OF  THE  RIND  IN  CENTIMETERS  AT  THE 
TOP  CENTER  AND  BOTTOM  CENTER  OF 
ALL  MARKETABLE  FRUITS 


Pounds  of  hydrated 
lime  per  acre 

Pounds 
60 

of  nitrogen 

120 

per  acre 
180 

Mean 

0 

500 

1,000 

Mean 

2.006 
1.797 
1.722 

1.842 

1.712 
1.818 
1.709 

1.746 

1.883 
1.722 
1.957 

1.854 

1.867 
1.779 
1.796 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  39): 
Not  significant. 


TABLE  21 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  AVERAGE 
THICKNESS  OF  THE  RIND  IN  CENTIMETERS  AT  THE 
BLOSSOM-END  OF  ALL  MARKETABLE  FRUITS 


Pounds  of  hydrated 
lime  per  acre 

Pounds 
60 

of  nitroiren 
120 

per  acre 
180 

Mean 

0 

500 

1,000 

Mean 

1.548 
1.008 
0.982 

1.179 

1.512 
1.365 
1.053 

1.310 

1.641 
0.979 
1.300 

1.307 

1.567 
1.117 
1.112 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  39): 

Calcium  linear-significant  at  the  0.05  level. 
Nitrogen-not  significant. 


56 
The  average  percentage  of  blossom-end  rot  of  the 
watermelon  fruits  associated  with  each  treatment  combination 
Is  given  In  Table  22.   The  analysis  of  variance  of  this  data 
revealed  no  significant  difference  among  treatments. 

TABLE  22 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE 
PERCENTAGE  OF  BLOSSOM-END  ROT 


Pounds  of  hydrated 
lime  per  acre 

Pounds 
60 

of  nitrogen 
120 

per  acre 
180 

Mean 

0 

500 

1,000 

Mean 

46.52 
48.83 
44.64 

46.66 

47.27 
46.46 
49.56 

47.76 

39.93 
51.55 
42.10 

44.53 

44.57 
48.95 
45.43 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  In  Table  39) 
Not  significant. 


All  fruits  were  examined  for  hollow-heart,  white- 
heart,  and  other  abnormalities;  however,  these  disorders 
were  very  limited  in  occurrence  and  of  no  importance  in 
this  experiment. 

Fruit  gejfc. 

The  total  number  of  fruits  set  per  treatment  is 
shown  in  Table  23.   There  was  a  significant  positive  quad- 
ratic response  to  the  increasing  calcium  levels.  Nitrogen 
treatments  had  no  significant  effect  on  the  total  number  of 
fruits  set. 


57 

TABLE  23 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE 
TOTAL  NUMBER  OF  FRUITS  SET 


Pounds  of  hydrated 
line  per  acre 

Pounds 
60 

of  nitrogen 
120 

per  acre 

180 

Total 

0 

500 

1,000 

Total 

136.6 
148.2 
136.8 

421.6 

124.6 
160.9 
163.2 

448.8 

92.2 
186.4 
163.5 

442.1 

353.4 
495.5 
463.5 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  39): 

Calcium  linear-significant  at  0.05  level. 
Calcium  quadratic-significant  at  0.05  level. 
Nitrogen-not  significant. 


Chemical  composition 

The  percentage  of  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium 
in  the  tips  of  young  watermelon  plants  on  May  1  is  presented 
in  Table  24.   There  was  a  highly  significant  linear  increase 
in  the  calcium  content  of  the  tips  as  the  calcium  supply 
was  increased  in  the  soil.   The  calcium  content  of  the  tips 
was  not  affected  by  the  nitrogen  treatments.  Neither  the 
potassium  nor  magnesium  content  of  the  young  tips  was  in- 
fluenced by  the  application  of  nitrogen  or  calcium  to  the 
soil. 

The  cation  composition  of  the  leaves  from  young 
watermelon  plants  is  shown  in  Table  25.   The  calcium  con- 
tent of  the  leaves  gave  a  curvilinear  response  to  calcium 
treatments,  increasing  with  increasing  amounts  of  lime  per 
acre.   In  response  to  nitrogen  treatments,  however,  the 


58 


TABLE  24 


THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  PERCENTAGE 
OF  CALCIUM,  POTASSIUM,  AND  MAGNESIUM  IN  THE 
TIPS  OF  YOUNG  WATERMELON  PLANTS 


Pounds  of  hydra ted 

Pounds  of  nitrogen 

per  acre 

Mean 

lime  per  acre 

60              120 

180 

Calcium  Content 

0 

500 

1,000 

0.545          0.385 
0.555          0.630 
0.713          0.937 

0.340 
0.713 
0.722 

0.423 
0.633 
0.791 

Mean 

0.604          0.651 

0.594 

PoUffsium  c<Mrtent 

0 

500 

1,000 

5.61             4.69 
5.19             5.02 
5.26             5.00 

5.11 
5.55 
5.51 

5.14 
5.25 
5.26 

Mean 


5.35 


4.90 


5.39 


0 

500 

1,000 


Mean 


Magnesium  Content 


0.340 
0.285 
0.292 

0.306 


0.285 
0.323 
0.308 

0.305 


0.300 
0.298 
0.288 

0.295 


0.308 
0.302 
0.296 


Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  40): 

Calcium  content-calcium  linear  (CaL)  sig- 
nificant at  0.01  level. 
Potassium  content-not  significant. 
Magnesium  content-not  significant. 


59 


TABLE  25 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  PERCENTAGE 

OF  CALCIUM,  POTASSIUM,  AND  MAGNESIUM  IN  THE 

LEAVES  OF  YOUNG  WATERMELON  PLANTS 


Pounds  of  hydra ted 

Pounds  0f  nit. r oi?en 

p«r  acre 

Mean 

lime  per  acre 

60      120 

180 

Calcium  Content 

0 

2.73    2.41 

1.96 

2.37 

500 

4.15    3.81 

3.59 

3.85 

1,000 

4.21    4.31 

4.06 

4.19 

Mean 


3.70 


3.51 


3.20 


Potassium  Content 

0 

500 

1,000 

5.75 
5.23 
5.24 

5.80 
5.42 
5.21 

5.90 

5.35 
5.67 

5.82 
5.33 
5.37 

Mean 

5.41 

5.48 

5.64 

Magnesium  Content 

0 

500 

1,000 

0.623 
0.450 
0.410 

0.600 
0.485 
0.385 

0.457 
0.428 
0.472 

0.560 
0.454 
0.422 

Mean 


0.494   0.490 


0.452 


Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Tafcle  40): 

Calcium- content-CaL,  calcium  quadratic 

(Ca0),  and  nitrogen  linear  (NT )  significant 

at  0.01  level.  u 

Potassium  content-CaL  significant  at  0.05 

level • 
Magnesium  content-Car  significant  at  0.01 

level;  C^  X  NL  significant  at  0.05  level. 


60 
calcium  content  shoved  a  highly  significant  linear  regres- 
sion, decreasing  as  the  nitrogen  levels  were  increased. 
Potassium  content  also  shoved  a  significant  linear  regres- 
sion, decreasing  as  the  calcium  levels  vere  increased  in 
the  soil.  The  magnesium  content  of  the  leaves  similarly 
decreased  in  a  highly  significant  linear  trend  as  a  result 
of  increasing  the  calcium  levels.  However,  a  significant 
linear  interaction  was  discovered  between  the  linear  re- 
sponses of  calcium  and  nitrogen,  Ca^  X  N  ,  on  the  magnesium 
content  of  the  leaves  of  young  plants  (Fig.  3).  The  effect 
of  increasing  nitrogen  on  the  linear  response  to  the  calcium 
treatments  vas  to  change  the  regression  from  negative  to 
slightly  positive  as  the  nitrogen  levels  increased  from  60 
to  180  pounds  per  acre* 

The  effect  of  the  calcium  and  nitrogen  treatments 
on  the  cation  composition  of  the  tips  from  the  mature  water- 
melon plants  is  presented  in  Table  26.  The  calcium  treat- 
ments had  no  significant  effect  on  the  cation  composition 
of  the  mature  tips.  The  potassium  and  magnesium  content 
of  the  tips,  hovever,  responded  in  a  significant  negative 
linear  fashion  to  the  increasing  nitrogen  levels. 

The  cation  composition  of  the  leaves  from  mature 
plants  is  given  in  Table  27.  Nitrogen  treatments  had  no 
significant  effect  on  the  percentage  of  potassium,  calcium, 
or  magnesium  in  the  mature  leaves.   The  calcium  content  of 
the  leaves  vas  increased  in  a  highly  significant  quadratic 


61 


0.7U 


0.6 


CO 

B  0.5 


0.4 


0.3 


0.2 


180 


Jl 


_L 


-L 


0  500  1,000 

POUNDS  OF  HYDRATED  LIME  PER  ACRE 

Fig.  3. — The  Interaction  of  calcium  and 
nitrogen  (Car  X  NL)  on  the  magnesium  content  of 
the  leaves  or  young  watermelon  plants 


c 


2.1 
2.0- 


co 

2   1.9 

H 
O 

H   1*8 

as 

W 
O 

-   1.7 


1.6- 


1.5 


\^60  lbs.  N 


lbs.  N 


lbs.  N 


0  500  1,000 

POUNDS  OF  HYDRATED  LIME  PER  ACRE 


Fig.  4. — The  interaction  of  calcium  and 
nitrogen  (CaQ  X  Nq)  on  the  potassium  content  of 
U.  S.  Number  1  watermelons. 


62 


TABLE  26 


THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  PERCENTAGE 
OF  CALCIUM,  POTASSIUM,  AND  MAGNESIUM  IN  THE 
TIPS  OF  MATURE  WATERMELON  PLANTS 


Pounds  of  hydra ted 

Pounds  of  nitrogen 

ner  acre 

Mean 

line  per  acre 

60      120 

180 

Calciwp  content 

0 

500 

1,000 

0.285    0.230 
0.370    0.300 
0.365    0.325 

0.325 
0.325 
0.300 

0.280 
0.332 
0.330 

Mean 

0.340    0.285 

0.317 

Potassium  Content 

0 

500 

1,000 

3.85     3.84 
4.06     3.35 
3.84     3.26 

3.75 
3.35 
3.56 

3.81 
3.59 
3.55 

Mean 


3.92 


3.48 


3.55 


Majrnesium  Content 

0 

500 

1,000 

0.460 
0.385 
0.400 

0.367 
0.355 
0.345 

0.380 
0.333 
0.390 

0.402 
0.358 
0.378 

Mean 

0.415 

0.356 

0.368 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  In  Tpole  41): 

Calcium  content-not  significant. 
Potassium  content -NT  significant  at  0.05 

level. 
Magnesium  content-Nr  significant  at  0.05 

level. 


63 


TABLE  27 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  PERCENTAGE 
OF  CALCIUM,  POTASSIUM,  AND  MAGNESIUM  IN  THE 
LEAVES  OF  MATURE  WATERMELON  PLANTS 


Pounds  of  hydrated 
line  per  acre 

Pounds  of  nitrogen 
60      120 

per  acre 

180 

Mean 

0 

500 

1,000 

Calcium  Content 

4.21     4.50 
8.16     8.88 
9.90     8.23 

4.63 
8.72 
9.15 

4.45 
8.59 
9.09 

Mean 


7.42 


7.20 


7.50 


Potassium  Content 


0 

500 

1,000 


3.21 
1.96 
1.96 


2.79 
2.19 
1.79 


2.81 
1.83 
2.08 


2.94 
1.99 
1.94 


Mean 


2.38 


2.26 


2.24 


MagnesjmB  Content 


0 

500 

1,000 


1.070 
1.020 
0.942 


1.111 

1.050 
0.850 


0.947 
0.902 
0.968 


1.040 
0.991 
0.920 


Mean 


1.010 


1.003 


0.939 


Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  41): 

Calcium  content-CaT ,  CaQ  significant  at 

0.01  level.     **    u 
Potassium  content-Cai,,  Ca0  significant  at 

0.01  level.  H 

Magnesium  content-not  significant. 


64 
fashion  and  the  potassium  content  was  decreased  in  a  highly 
significant  quadratic  manner  as  the  calcium  levels  were 
Increased  in  the  soil. 

The  results  of  the  analyses  of  the  mature  marketable 
fruit  for  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium  are  shown  in 
Table  28*  The  calcium  content  increased  in  a  highly  sig- 
nificant manner  as  a  result  of  the  calcium  applications,  and 
it  decreased  in  a  highly  significant  quadratic  fashion  as  a 
result  of  the  nitrogen  treatments.  The  potassium  content 
showed  significant  quadratic  regressions  as  a  result  of 
both  calcium  and  nitrogen  treatments.  However,  these  rela- 
tionships are  complicated  by  a  quadratic  interaction 
(Caq  X  N  )  shown  in  Fig.  4.  The  quadratic  regression  on 
calcium  changed  drastically  from  "concave  upward"  for  60 
and  180  pounds  of  nitrogen  to  "concave  downward"  for  the 
120  pounds  of  nitrogen  applied  per  acre.  The  magnesium 
content  responded  to  nitrogen  only,  and  this  was  a  quadratic 
relationship • 

The  composition  of  the  fruits  exhibiting  blossom- 
end  rot  is  shown  in  Table  29.   The  calcium  content  of  the 
fruit  showed  a  strong  linear  regression,  increasing  in  re- 
sponse to  increasing  increments  of  applied  calcium.  The 
potassium  content  responded  negatively  to  the  calcium  treat- 
ments and  positively  to  the  nitrogen  treatments.  However, 
a  significant  interaction  (CaL  X  Nq)  is  quite  evident  in 
Fig.  5.  Here  the  shape  of  the  linear  regression  of 


65 


TABLE  28 


THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  PERCENTAGE 
OF  CALCIUM,  POTASSIUM,  AND  MAGNESIUM  IN 
U.S.  NUMBER  1  WATERMELON  FRUITS 


Pounds  of  hydrated 

„ Pounds 

of  nitrocen 

per  acre 

Mean 

lime  per 

acre 

60 

120 

180 

CaJciwn  content 

0 

500 

1,000 

0.106 
0.163 
0.185 

0.095 
0.135 
0.135 

0.101 
0.131 
0.162 

0.101 
0.143 
0.161 

Mean 

0.151 

0.122 

0.131 

Potassium  Content 

0 

500 

1,000 

2.06 
1.71 

1.85 

1.91 
1.76 
1.58 

1.93 
1.71 
1.84 

1.97 
1.73 
1.76 

Mean 

1.87 

1.75 

1.83 

Magnesium  Content 

0 

500 

1,000 

0.143 
0.127 
0.125 

0.134 
0.120 
0.108 

0.146 
0.134 
0.143 

0.141 
0.127 
0.125 

Mean 

0.132 

0.121 

0.141 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  42): 

Calcium  content-CaL  significant  at  0.01 

level;  N.,  NQ  significant  at  0.05  level. 
Potassium  content-  CaL,  CaQ  singificant  at 


N 


Q' 


Jaq-X  Nq  significant  at 


0.01  level; 
0.05  level. 
Magnesium  content-Nn  significant  at  0.05 
level. 


66 


TABLE  29 

THE  EFFECTS  OF  CALCIUM  AND  NITROGEN  ON  THE  PERCENTAGE 
OF  CALCIUM,  POTASSIUM,  AND  MAGNESIUM  IN 
WATERMELON  FRUITS  EXHIBITING 
BLOSSOM-END  ROT 


Pounds  of 

hydra ted 

Pounds 

of  nitrocen 

per  acre 

Mean 

lime  per 

acre 

60 

120 

180 

Calcium  Content 

0 

500 

1,000 

0.199 
0.243 
0.321 

0.180 
0.255 
0.233 

0.226 
0.219 
0.291 

0.202 
0.239 
0.282 

Mean 

0.254 

0.223 

0.245 

Potassium  Content 

0 

500 

1,000 

2.15 
2.36 
2.34 

2.92 
2.54 
1.98 

3.01 
2.49 

2.48 

2.69 
2.46 
2.27 

Mean 

2.28 

2.48 

2.66 

Magnesium  Content 

0.238 
0.181 
0.156 

0 

500 

1,000 

0.180 
0.184 
0.159 

0.218 
0.154 
0.124 

0.212 
0.173 
0.146 

Mean 

0.174 

0.165 

0.192 

Effect  (from  A.O.V.  in  Table  42): 

Calcium  content-Car.  significant  at  0.01  level. 
Potassium  content -CaT  significant  at  0.01 


N 


L* 


'K 


CaL  X  N^  significant  at  0.05 


level; 
level. 

Magnesium  eontent-CaL  significant  at  0.01 
level;  CaL  X  NL  significant  at  0.05  level. 


67 


3.01- 


s  2.8 

M 
CO 

3  2.6 

H 
O 

h  2.4 

5": 
K 
O 

«  2.2 


2.0 


1.8 


/180  lbs.  N 


^60  lbs.  N 


120  lbs.  N 


1 


0  500  1,000 

POUNDS  OF  HYDRATED  LIME  PER  ACRE 

Fig.  5. — The  interaction  of  calcium  and 
nitrogen  (CaL  X  Nq)  on  the  potassium  content  of 
watermelon  fruits  exhibiting  blossom-end  rot. 


0.24i- 


0.22- 


S  0.20 
0.18 


o 

I 

Pi 


— 

- 

\^180   lbs. 

N 

- 

^\^r60    lbs.    N 

- 

i 

i 

^120    lbs.    NT 

0.16- 


0.14- 


0.12 

0  500  1,000 

POUNDS  OF  HYDRATED  LIME  PER  ACRE 

Fig.  6. — The  interaction  of  calcium  and 
nitrogen  (CaL  x  Ntl)  on  tne  magnesium  content  of 
watermelon  fruits  exhibiting  blossom-end  rot. 


68 
potassium  on  calcium  changed  markedly  from  positive  to 
negative  in  a  curvilinear  fashion  for  different  levels  of 
nitrogen.  The  highly  significant  linear  reduction  in  the 
magnesium  content  in  response  to  calcium  treatments  appeared 
to  be  influenced  by  the  nitrogen  levels.   It  is  evident  by 
the  linear  interaction  (Ca~  X  N^)  of  the  magnesium  content 
on  calcium  shown  in  Fig.  6.  The  graph  clearly  shows  how  the 
negative  slope  of  the  regression  becomes  steeper  as  the 
nitrogen  is  increased  above  60  pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre. 


DISCUSSION 

Growth  Responses 

In  the  greenhouse  experiments  with  watermelons,  any 
level  of  calcium  In  the  nutrient  solution  from  4  to  256  ppm 
appeared  to  produce  normal  growth  of  plants  the  first  two 
weeks  after  transplanting.  After  this,  plants  grown  In 
solutions  containing  4  ppm  of  calcium  began  to  develop 
deficiency  symptoms  In  the  leaves,  vines,  and  roots,  and 
these  symptoms  grew  increasingly  more  pronounced  as  the 
season  progressed.  Within  three  days  all  watermelon  plants 
placed  In  solutions  containing  no  calcium  began  developing 
deficiency  symptoms  which  resulted  in  death  of  the  plants  in 
approximately  two  weeks.  These  visible  symptoms  appeared  to 
be  characteristic  of  a  severe  calcium  deficiency  rather  than 
toxicity  jf  any  other  element  or  elements.  No  deficiency 
symptoms  were  apparent  in  the  tops  of  plants  grown  in  8  ppm 
calcium;  however,  the  roots  did  show  obvious  deficiency 
symptoms  at  the  8  ppm  level  but  not  at  16  ppm  of  calcium. 
Research  reported  by  Bidiulph  et  al.  (7)  indicated  that  Red 
Kidney  bean  plants  survived  In  nutrient  solutions  containing 
as  low  as  0.05  mlllimoles  (2  ppm)  of  calcium.   Below  this 
level,  the  beans  developed  a  severe  deficiency  or  chlorosis 
which  resulted  in  death. 

69 


70 
The  negative  linear  relationships  existing  between 
the  dry  weight  of  vines  or  the  dry  weight  of  the  roots  and 
the  calcium  concentrations,  when  expressed  logarithmically, 
may  be  explained  by  the  fruit  yields  (Fig.  7).   In  solutions 
containing  16  through  256  ppm  of  calcium  a  considerable 
part  of  the  total  plant  weight  was  represented  by  the  dry 
weight  of  the  fruits.  This  is  apparent  by  observation  of 
the  non-significant  quadratic  trend  in  total  weight.   The 
curvilinear  response  of  root  growth  is  unquestionably  mainly 
a  response  to  treatments;  however,  it  may  be  partially 
attributed  to  the  amount  of  the  base  portion  of  the  main 
stem  harvested  with  the  root  systems.  Therefore,  the  nega- 
tive linear  pattern  appears  to  describe  the  data  adequately 
(Fig.  7). 

The  positive  linear  response  of  early  vine  growth 
to  calcium  treatments  in  the  field  (Table  14)  is  in  general 
agreement  with  data  obtained  from  a  preliminary  sand-pot 
experiment.  Pots  of  Leon  fine  sand  receiving  600  pounds  of 
hydrated  lime  per  acre  produced  significantly  more  vine 
growth  than  pots  receiving  no  lime,  but  vine  growth  was  not 
significantly  different  in  pots  receiving  600;  1,200;  1,800; 
or  2,400  pounds  of  hydrated  lime  per  acre.  Field  application 
of  nitrogen  did  not  Influence  the  early  vine  growth  signifi- 
cantly. This  may  be  explained  on  either  of  the  following 
assumptions:   (1)  the  excessive  rains  following  application 
partially  eliminated  the  nitrogen  variable  or  (2)  sufficient 


71 


M  IH 


DRY   WEIGHT    IN   GRAMS   FOR   THE  ROOTS 
t-        «0        ifl        ^ 


© 

P-l  » 


GC 


®    C 
*    V 

E 


DRY  WEIGHT  IN  GRAMS  FOR  VINES,  FRUITS 
AND  TOTAL 


72 
nitrogen  remained  at  all  nitrogen  levels  after  the  exces- 
sive rains  to  give  maximum  growth  in  the  early  stages. 

The  percentage  increase  in  early  and  total  yields 
both  in  pounds  and  numbers  are  shown  in  Fig.  8.  On  an 
acre  basis  the  application  of  500  and  1,000  pounds  of 
hydrated  lime  increased  the  number  of  early  harvested  water- 
melons by  80  and  129  respectively.  These  figures  represent 
a  percentage  increase  over  the  no  lime  treatment  of  40  and 
60  per  cent  respectively.  On  an  acre  basis  the  application 
of  500  and  1,000  pounds  of  hydrated  lime  increased  the 
pounds  of  watermelons  harvested  early  by  2,002.8  and 
3,222.6  or  44  and  68  per  cent  respectively  over  the  no  lime 
treatment.  The  percentage  increase  in  the  number  of  pounds 
was  slightly  larger  than  the  percentage  Increase  in  the  ac- 
tual number  of  watermelons.  This  indicates  that  the  average 
weight  per  melon  was  slightly  greater  as  a  result  of  the 
lime  treatments;  however,  statistical  analysis  based  on  the 
average  weight  per  plot  showed  no  significant  difference. 

When  the  total  yield  of  U.S.  Number  1  watermelons 
per  acre  is  considered,  the  application  of  500  and  1,000 
pounds  of  hydrated  lime  increased  the  yields  by  127  and  156 
watermelons  (39  and  48  per  cent)  respectively.  A  compari- 
son of  the  percentage  increase  in  the  total  number  with  the 
percentage  increase  in  total  pounds  again  indicates  that  the 
melons  were  larger  in  size,  and  this  is  supported  by  statis- 
tical significance  based  on  the  average  weight  per  plot.   It 
should  be  pointed  out,  however,  that  the  average  weight  per 


73 


E- 
O 


CO 

c 

E 


CO 

-a 

c 


S2        Pu 


o 
o 

o 


o 
o 


o 
< 


_r  o 


o 
o 


o 
rt  l~  o 

■U  C 

O   b/' 

+>  c  b: 

•H  C 

T3    >  t-4 

C  i-t  > 

rf    0)  t4 

O  C) 
X  © 

M 

d  co 
©  -tj  co 

o  v 

CHO 

•^    P,rH 

P. 

a>  S 
CO   o 

d  u 

CD  <m 

£-, 

©    CO 

c  c 


© 
© 

5- 


© 
> 

© 

© 

E 


o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

9 

o 

o 

o 

OJ 

00 

t> 

co 

Ifi 

n 

C\J 

©  ©  ih 
w  E 

d  C  TJ 
■p  ©  © 
C  -P  V 

cd  d  d 
©  3  t, 

-      ts 

CD  rH  >5 
P.       X! 

h 
CD   CD  Cm 
43  P    © 

i   3  co 

i  as  -a 
c 

or     •  3 

A    O 
•      •    £}, 

bot3 

«H        O 

St.  ft*  O 
O  O 

X}  rH  • 
iH         © 

©  x)  E 
■H   C  "H 

>>  d  r-i 


PER   CENT    INCREASE 


74 
plot  was  based  on  unequal  numbers;  therefore,  the  analysis 
of  variance  may  be  biased. 

Since  these  yield  increases  were  obtained  from  row3 
spaced  15  feet  apart  and  the  hills  10  feet  apart  in  the  row, 
even  greater  total  yields  were  probable  by  spacing  the  rows 
or  the  hills  closer  together.   In  commercial  watermelon 
fields  rows  are  usually  spaced  8  to  10  feet  apart.  Nettles 
and  Halsey  (53)  reported  significant  increases  in  the  number 
of  watermelons  produced  as  the  number  of  hills  per  row  were 
increased.  Plants  spaced  3  feet  apart  in  rows  10  feet  apart 
produced  1,260  marketable  watermelons  per  acre,  and  plants 
spaced  12  feet  apart  in  10-foot  rows  produced  660  marketable 
watermelons  per  acre.  The  average  weight  did  not  differ 
significantly,  but  it  tended  to  be  greater  at  the  wider 
spacings. 

From  the  literature  review  and  from  examination  of 
all  soil  and  tissue  analytical  data  it  appears  that  the 
beneficial  effects  of  calcium  resulted  from  both  an  in- 
creased supply  of  calcium  and  pH  changes,  which  may  have 
directly  or  indirectly  affected  the  availability  of  certain 
other  elements.   In  general,  investigators  agree  that  the 
calcium  to  magnesium  ratio  in  the  soil  should  be  in  the 
range  6  to  10:1.  Data  in  Table  11  and  31  indicate  the  cal- 
cium to  magnesium  ratios  associated  with  the  three  treatments 
(0,  500,  and  1,000  pounds  of  hydrated  lime  per  acre)  were 
approximately  1:1,  6:1,  and  15:1,  respectively.  Likewise, 
more  favorable  calcium  to  potassium  ratios  existed  in  the 


75 
plots  receiving  lime.  The  importance  of  these  ratios  is 
exemplified  by  the  data  on  the  cation  composition  of  the 
plants  shown  in  Tables  24  through  30.   In  general,  the  cal- 
cium content  of  the  plant  Increased  from  50  to  100  per  cent 
in  response  to  added  calcium,  and  the  potassium  and  mag- 
nesium content  generally  decreased.  Moreover,  WilfcLns  (83) 
pointed  out  that  cucurbits  accumulate  large  quantities  of 
calcium,  and  suggested  that  it  may  be  desirable  to  plant 
these  crops  on  soils  containing  an  abundant  supply  of  cal- 
cium. 

Another  undoubtably  important  factor  contributing 
to  the  increased  yields  is  the  soil  pH.  From  data  in 
Table  11,  it  may  be  seen  that  the  average  pH  corresponding 
to  the  three  calcium  levels  were  4.9,  5.4,  and  5.8. 
Fiskell  and  co-workers  (23,  24)  have  shown  that  toxic  con- 
centrations of  aluminum  ions  are  present  in  many  of  the 
Florida  soils,  including  Kanapaha,  with  a  low  pH.  Further- 
more, it  has  been  established  that  the  rate  of  nitrification 
as  well  as  organic  matter  decomposition  is  greatly  in- 
fluenced by  the  soil  pH  (13,  81). 

Nitrogen  had  no  significant  effect  on  any  of  the 
yield  data  from  the  field  experiment.  This  may  be  attributed 
in  part  to  excessive  rainfall  following  both  nitrogen  ap- 
plications.  Over  eight  inches  of  rain  fell  the  first  15 
days  following  the  initial  application  of  nitrogen.   Over 
seven  inches  of  rain  fell  the  first  30  days  following  the 
second  application  of  nitrogen.  Data  in  Table  13  indicated 


76 
that  almost  all  of  the  nitrates  and  approximately  50  per 
cent  of  the  potassium  was  leached  from  the  upper  eight 
inches  of  the  soil  by  slightly  more  than  eight  inches  of 
rainfall.   Since  ammonium  occupies  a  lower  position  in  the 
lyotrophic  series  than  potassium  it  follows  that  at  least 
50  per  cent  of  the  ammonium  nitrogen  also  was  lost. 

No  definite  relationship  was  established  between 
blossom-end  rot  and  calcium  treatments  in  the  greenhouse 
or  the  field.   In  all  greenhouse  work  using  nutrient  cul- 
tures, all  the  fruits  set  developed  blossom-end  rot. 
Geraldson  (26)  observed  that  black-heart  of  celery,  a  cal- 
cium deficiency,  occurred  in  nutrient  solutions  in  the  green- 
house regardless  of  the  calcium  levels.  Black-heart  was 
controlled  by  foliar  applications  of  0.04  molar  calcium 
chloride.  A  similar  control  has  been  developed  for  blos- 
som-end rot  of  tomatoes  (27). 

In  the  exploratory  work  in  the  greenhouse  with  water- 
melons, a  lower  incidence  of  blossom-end  rot  was  observed 
with  treatments  receiving  foliar  sprays  of  0.04  molar  calcium 
chloride  than  from  pots  receiving  no  spray.   This  does  not 
necessarily  establish  the  disorder  as  a  calcium  deficiency; 
however,  it  does  support  the  theory  that  blossom-end  rot  is 
a  physiological  disorder.   This  is  further  substantiated  by 
the  fact  that  a  large  percentage  of  the  ovaries  of  plants 
grown  in  four  and  eight  ppm  calcium  decayed  beginning  at 
the  blossom-end  even  before  the  floral  parts  opened.   It  is 
suggested,  therefore,  that  future  examinations  into  the 


77 
causes  of  blossom-end  rot  of  watermelons  may  be  more  prof- 
itable If  attempted  under  controlled  environmental  condi- 
tions. 

The  differential  calcium  treatments  tested  In  the 
field  did  have  an  effect  on  the  rlnd  thickness  at  the 
blossom-end  of  the  watermelon  but  not  on  the  average  thick- 
ness of  the  top  and  bottom  center  of  the  rlnd.  At  the 
blossom-end  the  rlnd  thickness  decreased  as  the  calcium 
levels  were  Increased.  At  least  two  possible  explanations 
exist  for  this:   it  is  possible  that  calcium  enhanced  ma- 
turity; however,  this  is  not  supported  by  a  significant 
increase  in  the  soluble  solids,  and  observations  have  shown 
that  fruits  affected  with  blossom-end  disorders  tend  to  have 
a  thick  whitish  rlnd  at  the  blossom-end;  therefore,  increas- 
ing the  calcium  supply  may  have  reduced  these  disorders.   It 
should  also  be  pointed  out  that  the  calcium  content  of  the 
fruit  generally  increased  linearly  in  response  to  calcium 
treatments. 

SejL  Expression,  and  frvX%  *SLL 
Calcium  treatments  had  a  profound  effect  on  sex  ex- 
pression in  nutrient  solutions  containing  relatively  low 
amounts  of  calcium  (Table  7).   Plants  grown  in  13  liters  of 
a  solution  containing  4  ppm  calcium  had  an  average  ratio  of 
staminate  to  pistillate  flowers  of  27.79:1.  When  the  calcium 
level  was  raised  to  8  ppm  the  ratio  dropped  to  8.74:1  and  did 
not  differ  significantly  as  the  calcium  level  was  Increased 


78 
from  4  to  256  ppm;  however,  at  the  higher  calcium  levels 
the  ratio  tended  to  increase.  From  data  presented  in  Tables 
9  and  10  it  may  be  assumed  that  this  drastic  increase  in 
the  flower  ratio  was  due  to  either  a  deficiency  of  calcium, 
an  excess  of  potassium  and  magnesium  in  the  nutrient  solu- 
tion, or  any  combination  of  the  latter  with  a  calcium  de- 
ficiency. 

Apparently  calcium  concentrations  greater  than  8 
ppm  are  necessary  for  fruit  set.   Since  a  large  number  of 
the  ovaries  of  plants  in  solutions  containing  4  and  8  ppm 
calcium  decayed,  it  is  assumed  that  insufficient  quantities 
of  calcium  were  present  for  normal  cellular  development. 
The  parabolic  response  in  the  number  of  fruits  set  to  cal- 
cium treatments  in  the  field  may  be  explained  on  the  basis 
that  the  liming  applications  enhanced  vine  growth  thereby 
increasing  the  actual  numbers  of  fruits  set  (Table  23). 

Chemical  Analyses 
In  the  greenhouse  experiment,  the  increase  in  the 
calcium  content  of  the  tips  and  fruits  was  linear  as  the 
logarithms  of  the  calcium  treatments  increased,  however,  a 
positive  curvilinear  response  occurred  in  the  leaves  and 
roots.   It  is  generally  agreed  that  increasing  the  concen- 
tration of  any  element  in  the  substrate  usually  results  in 
increased  absorption  of  that  element  by  the  plant  (44,  59) . 
The  linear  decrease  in  the  potassium  content  of  the  leaves 
and  roots  probably  was  produced  by  a  cation  antagonism 


79 
resulting  from  an  increase  in  the  calcium  content.  The 
failure  of  potassium  to  decrease  significantly  in  the  tips 
and  fruits  may  be  explained  on  the  basis  that  potassium  is 
a  very  mobile  element  and  occurs  in  relatively  large  quan- 
tities in  areas  of  high  metabolic  activity  (48,  50).   Ap- 
parently cation  antagonism  between  calcium  and  magnesium 
resulted  in  a  linear  decrease  in  the  magnesium  content  of 
the  leaves  and  roots  and  a  quadratic  decrease  in  the  tips 
and  fruits. 

Conversion  of  the  data  in  Table  10  to  equivalents 
per  100  grams  indicated  that  the  calcium-equivalent  in- 
crease in  the  plants  at  the  various  treatments  was  con- 
siderably greater  than  the  accumulative  equivalent  decrease 
of  potassium  and  magnesium.   This  may  be  attributed  to 
inactivation  of  much  of  the  absorbed  calcium  by  organic 
acid  precipitation  thereby  causing  a  continuous  build-up 
of  the  total  cation  equivalents  in  the  tissue  as  calcium 
increased  in  the  substrate. 

The  influence  of  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the  aver- 
age percentage  of  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium  of 
tissue  samples  from  the  field  experiment  is  shown  in  Table 
30.  The  linear  increase  in  the  calcium  content  in  response 
to  calcium  applications  occurred  in  the  leaves  of  both 
young  and  mature  plants.   The  significant  decrease  in  the 
calcium  content  of  the  leaves  at  the  first  sampling  date 
as  a  result  of  nitrogen  treatments  failed  to  occur  at  the 
second  sampling  date.   This  may  be  the  consequence  of 


80 


TABLE  30 


THE  AVERAGE  PERCENTAGE  OF  CALCIUM,  POTASSIUM,  AND  MAGNESIUM 
ASSOCIATED  WITH  EACH  CALCIUM  AND  EACH  NITROGEN 
LEVEL  IN  BOTH  VINES  AND  FRUITS  FROM 
THE  FIELD  EXPERIMENT 


Treatment 
levels 

Composition  of  young 
plants 
(May  1,  1959) 

Composition  of  mature 
plants 
(June  10,  1959) 

Leaves 

Leaves 

Cal  clitm 

Ca 

K 

Mg 

Ca 

K 

Mg 

0 

2.37 

5.82 

0.560 

4.45 

2.94 

1.04 

500 

3.85 

5.33 

.454 

8.59 

1.99 

0.99 

1,000 

4.19 

5.37 

.422 

9.09 

1.94 

0.92 

Nitrogen 
60 

3.70 

5.41 

.494 

7.42 

2.38 

1.01 

120 

3.51 

5.48 

.490 

7.20 

2.26 

1.00 

180 

3.20 

5.64 

.452 

7.50 

2.24 

0.94 

Tips 

Tips 

Calcium 

Ca 

K 

Mg 

Ca 

K 

Mg 

0 

0.423 

5.14 

0.308 

0.280 

2.81 

0.402 

500 

•  633 

5.25 

.302 

•  332 

3.59 

.358 

1,000 

.791 

5.26 

.296 

.330 

3.55 

.378 

Nitrogen 
60 

.604 

5.35 

.306 

.340 

3.92 

.415 

120 

.651 

4.90 

.305 

•285 

3.48 

.356 

180 

0.594 

5.39 

0.295 

0.317 

3.55 

0.368 

Composition  of  U.  S. 

number  1  fruits 

Composition  of  fruits 
exhibiting 
blossom-end  rot 

Cal  dura 

Ca 

E 

Mg 

Ca 

E 

Mg 

0 

0.101 

1.97 

0.141 

0.202 

2.69 

0.212 

500 

.143 

1.73 

.127 

.239 

2.46 

.173 

1,000 

.161 

1.76 

.125 

.282 

2.27 

•  146 

Nitrogen 
60 

.151 

1.87 

.132 

.254 

2.28 

.174 

120 

.122 

1.75 

•  121 

.223 

2.48 

.165 

180 

0.131 

1.83 

0.141 

0.245 

2.66 

0.192 

Oven  dry  weight  basis. 


81 
retardation  In  growth  and  less  antagonism  between  ammonium 
and  calcium  through  leaching  and  oxidation  of  the  ammonium. 
The  concentration  of  calcium  in  the  leaves,  regardless  of 
treatments,  approximately  doubled  from  the  first  to  the 
second  sampling  date.   This  is  probably  due  to  the  precipi- 
tation of  a  large  percentage  of  the  calcium  by  certain 
organic  acids. 

The  potassium  content  of  the  leaves  at  both  sampling 
dates  decreased  in  response  to  calcium  applications;  al- 
though, nitrogen  had  no  effect  on  the  potassium  percentage 
of  the  leaves  at  either  sampling  period.   The  leaf  samples 
taken  early  in  the  season  contained  more  than  twice  as  much 
potassium  on  a  percentage  basis  as  those  collected  late  In 
the  season.  Perhaps  the  best  explanation  of  this  is  a  com- 
bination of  the  mass  action  effect  of  the  potassium  applied 
early  in  the  season  with  luxury  consumption  by  the  plant, 
and  a  dilution  effect  later  in  the  season  induced  by  heavy 
vine  growth. 

The  interaction  between  calcium  and  nitrogen  on  the 
magnesium  content  of  the  leaves  at  the  first  sampling  may  be 
attributed  to  varying  degrees  of  antagonism  between  the  ap- 
plied calcium  and  ammonium  nitrogen  when  the  level  of  either 
was  changed  along  with  differential  growth  responses.  At 
maturity  this  decrease  in  the  magnesium  percentage  of  the 
leaves  was  not  statistically  significant.   The  relative  in- 
crease in  the  magnesium  percentage  of  the  leaves  as  the 
season  progressed,  regardless  of  treatment,  was  approximately 


82 
proportional  to  the  relative  increase  in  the  calcium  per- 
centage. 

The  equivalent  shift  of  the  cation  composition  of 
the  leaves  in  response  to  treatments  at  either  sampling 
time  is  in  agreement  with  the  greenhouse  findings*  That  is, 
the  calcium-equivalent  increase  in  the  tissue  in  response 
to  calcium  applications  is  much  greater  than  the  total  mag- 
nesium and  potassium  equivalent  decrease  in  the  tissue. 

The  linear  increase  in  the  calcium  content  of  the 
tips  at  the  first  sampling  date  in  response  to  the  calcium 
levels  had  disappeared  by  the  second  sampling  date  (Tables 
21,  26,  30).  Perhaps  the  best  explanation  of  this  is  that 
the  young  plants  were  in  a  more  vigorous  state  of  growth 
and  assimilation  than  the  mature  plants.  Also,  this  would 
account  for  the  greater  percentage  of  calcium  in  the  tips 
of  young  plants. 

Neither  the  potassium  nor  the  magnesium  content  in 
the  tips  at  the  first  sampling  date  was  significantly  in- 
fluenced by  any  treatment.  However,  nitrogen  treatments 
decreased  the  potassium  and  magnesium  content  of  the  tips 
at  the  second  sampling  time.  This  may  be  attributed  to  a 
combination  of  a  number  of  factors,  including  a  retardation 
of  the  physiological  aotivity  of  the  merstimatic  tissues, 
differential  build  up  of  ammonium  ions  in  the  tissue,  and  a 
dilution  effect  resulting  from  differential  vine  growth  and 
fruit  yields. 


83 

In  general,  the  normal  fruits  contained  considerably 
less  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium  than  fruits  exhibiting 
blossom-end  rot.   The  most  logical  explanation  of  this  Is  a 
dilution  effect,  since  the  mature  fruits  were  approximately 
four  to  five  times  larger  than  the  ones  exhibiting  blossom- 
end  rot  (Table  28,  39,  30). 

The  calcium  content  of  both  types  of  fruit  samples 
increased  linearly  in  response  to  calcium  treatments.   The 
curvilinear  response  of  calcium  in  the  mature  fruits  to 
nitrogen  may  be  attributed  to  antagonism  between  ammonium 
and  nitrogen  and  differential  vine  growth. 

The  curvilinear  interactions  of  the  calcium  and  ni- 
trogen treatments  on  the  potassium  content  of  both  types  of 
fruits  may  have  resulted  from  mass  action  effect  of  the 
hydra ted  lime,  antagonism  between  ammonium  and  potassium, 
and  dilution  due  to  differential  growth  responses  (Figs.  4 
and  5).   The  same  explanation  may  be  given  for  the  inter- 
action of  treatments  on  the  magnesium  content  of  fruits 
showing  blossom-end  rot  (Fig.  6). 


SUMMARY  AND  CONCLUSION 

Research  was  conducted  In  both  the  greenhouse  and 
the  field  to  evaluate  the  effects  of  varying  calcium  levels 
on  vine  growth,  yields,  quality,  sex  expression  and  fruit 
set,  and  the  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium  content  of 
plant  tissues  of  the  Charleston  Gray  variety  of  watermelons. 
In  the  greenhouse,  plants  grown  in  a  basic  nutrient  solution 
containing  no  calcium  developed  severe  calcium  deficiency 
symptoms  and  died  within  two  weeks  following  transplanting. 
Plants  grown  in  4  ppm  calcium  began  to  develop  calcium  de- 
ficiency symptoms  in  both  the  tops  and  roots  three  weeks 
following  transplanting,  and  they  grew  increasingly  more 
severe  as  the  season  progressed.  Plants  grown  in  8  ppm 
calcium  showed  no  deficiency  symptoms  in  the  tops,  although 
slight  deficiency  symptoms  were  present  in  the  roots.  Plants 
grew  normally  in  nutrient  solutions  ranging  from  16  to  256 
ppm  calcium. 

The  leaves  of  deficient  plants  were  dark  green  in 
color,  moderately  cupped  under  at  the  margins,  and  severely 
restricted  especially  at  the  apex  forming  a  more  circular 
type  leaf,  and  the  vine  laterals  were  short  and  very  nu- 
merous. The  root  systems  of  calcium  deficient  plants  were 
short,  dense,  very  numerous,  and  often  dark  at  the  apex 
indicating  death. 

84 


85 
The  dry  weight  of  the  Tines  and  the  roots,  when 
analyzed  separately,  decreased  linearly  as  the  logarithms 
of  the  calcium  concentration  increased  in  the  nutrient  solu- 
tion. However,  total  dry  weight  (vines,  roots  and  fruit) 
did  not  differ  significantly  among  calcium  levels. 

In  the  field  experiment  testing  three  levels  of 
calcium  (0,  500,  and  1,000  pounds  of  hydrated  lime  per  acre) 
and  three  levels  of  nitrogen  (60,  120,  and  180  pounds  per 
acre),  the  dry  weight  of  early  vine  growth  increased  sig- 
nificantly in  a  linear  pattern  in  response  to  increasing 
calcium  levels.  Nitrogen  did  not  affect  early  vine  growth 
or  any  other  growth  measurements  taken  in  this  experiment. 
Explanations  are  suggested  based  on  soil  test  and  rainfall 
data. 

There  was  a  significant  linear  Increase  in  early 
and  total  yield  in  both  pounds  and  numbers  of  marketable 
watermelons  as  a  result  of  increased  calcium  levels.  The 
average  weight  per  melon  of  the  early  yield  was  not  affected 
by  treatments;  however,  the  average  weight  per  melon  of  the 
total  yield  was  increased  significantly  by  increasing  the 
calcium  levels.  The  environmental  factors  possibly  respon- 
sible for  these  yield  increases  are  discussed.   It  appeared 
that  the  beneficial  effects  of  calcium  resulted  from  both 
an  increased  supply  of  calcium  and  pH  changes  which  may 
have  directly  or  indirectly  affected  the  availability  of 
other  elements. 


86 
Calcium  levels  in  the  greenhouse  nutrient  solutions 
had  a  profound  effect  on  sex  expression  and  fruit  set  at 
the  lower  concentrations.  The  ratio  of  staminate  to  pistil- 
late flowers  in.  solutions  containing  4  ppm  calcium  was 
27.79:1.  When  the  calcium  concentration  was  Increased  to 
8  ppm  the  flower  ratio  dropped  to  8.74:1,  and  It  did  not 
differ  significantly  as  the  calcium  levels  were  increased 
to  256  ppm.  At  least  16  ppm  of  calcium  In  the  nutrient 
solutions  were  necessary  for  fruit  set.   In  the  field  the 
total  number  of  fruits  set  Increased  in  a  quadratic  fashion 
as  the  calcium  levels  were  increased.  Nitrogen  had  no  ef- 
fect on  the  numbers  of  fruit  set  in  the  field.  A  large  per- 
centage of  the  ovaries  produced  by  plants  grown  in  nutrient 
solutions  containing  4  or  8  ppm  calcium  turned  dark  brown 
to  black  in  color  beginning  at  the  blossom-end,  even  before 
the  floral  parts  opened.  All  fruits  set  in  the  greenhouse, 
regardless  of  the  admixture  of  the  nutrient  solutions,  de- 
veloped blossom-end  rot  within  three  weeks  after  flowering. 
The  percentage  of  blossom-end  rot  in  the  field  experiments 
could  not  be  associated  with  treatments.  However,  the  rind 
thickness  at  the  blossom-end  of  marketable  fruits  decreased 
linearly  as  the  calcium  treatments  increased. 

Analyses  of  data  from  three  fertility  experiments 
during  the  1958  season  revealed  that  the  occurrence  of 
blossom-end  rot  could  be  associated  with  the  soil  profile 
characteristics  but  not  with  the  different  fertility  treat- 
ments. 


87 
In  the  field  experiment,  the  different  fertility 
treatments  tested  resulted  In  no  significant  Influence  on 
the  soluble  sugars,  hollow-heart,  white-heart,  or  average 
thickness  of  the  rind  measured  at  the  center  of  the  fruit. 

Analyses  of  tissue  samples  from  various  plant  parts 
indicated  that  watermelons  absorb  relatively  large  quanti- 
ties of  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium.  The  greatest 
concentration  of  calcium  or  magnesium  occurred  in  the  older 
leaves  with  the  percentages  decreasing  in  the  following 
order:  basal  leaves,  mid-leaves,  tips,  stems  and  fruits. 
The  potassium  percentages  decreased  in  the  following  order: 
fruits,  stems,  tips,  leaves. 

Analyses  of  the  tips,  leaves,  roots  and  fruits  from 
the  greenhouse  experiment  Indicated,  in  general,  that  as 
the  calcium  concentration  was  Increased  logarithmically  in 
the  nutrient  medium  the  calcium  content  In  the  tissues  in- 
creased and  the  potassium  and  magnesium  content  decreased. 
The  Increase  in  the  percentage  of  calcium  In  the  tips  and 
fruits  was  linear  and  the  increase  in  the  calcium  content 
of  the  leaves  and  roots  was  curvilinear,  when  measured 
against  the  logarithms  of  the  calcium  concentrations  in  the 
nutrient  solution.   Significant  negative  linear  regressions 
in  the  potassium  content  occurred  in  the  leaves  and  roots 
but  not  in  the  tips  and  fruits  in  response  to  calcium  levels. 
The  negative  regression  in  the  magnesium  content  induced  by 
the  calcium  levels  was  linear  in  the  roots  and  fruits  and 
quadratic  in  the  leaves  and  tips. 


88 
Analyses  of  tip  and  leaf  samples  from  both  young 
and  mature  watermelon  plants  from  the  field  Indicated  that 
the  calcium  percentage  generally  increased,  and  the  mag- 
nesium and  potassium  content  decreased  as  the  calcium  sup- 
ply was  increased  in  the  soil.  The  influence  of  nitrogen 
on  the  cation  composition  of  the  leaf  and  tip  samples  was 
at  variance  for  the  two  sampling  dates;  however,  any  sig- 
nificant effect  of  nitrogen  treatments  on  the  cation  com- 
position of  the  tissues  generally  resulted  in  a  decrease 
of  the  particular  element  as  the  nitrogen  levels  were  in- 
creased in  the  soil. 

On  a  percentage  basis  the  calcium  and  magnesium 
content  of  the  leaves  of  mature  plants,  regardless  of 
treatment,  was  approximately  double  that  of  the  leaves  of 
the  young  plants,  while  the  potassium  content  was  approxi- 
mately 50  per  cent  less  in  the  older  plants.  The  calcium 
or  potassium  percentage  of  the  tips  of  mature  plants  was 
50  per  cent  less,  while  the  magnesium  percentage  remained 
fairly  constant  from  the  first  to  the  second  sampling. 

Analyses  of  U.  S.  Number  1  watermelons  and  those 
exhibiting  blossom-end  rot  revealed  that  the  calcium  content 
generally  Increased  and  the  potassium  and  magnesium  content 
generally  decreased  in  response  to  increasing  calcium  levels. 
Increasing  nitrogen  levels,  however,  resulted  in  a  reduction 
of  both  the  calcium  and  magnesium  content  of  the  U.  S.  Number 
1  watermelon  fruits.   The  magnesium  content  of  the  fruits 


89 
exhibiting  blossom-end  rot  and  the  potassium  content  of 
both  types  of  fruits  was  influenced  by  calcium  and  nitrogen 
interactions. 

The  calcium,  potassium,  and  magnesium  content  of  the 
U.  S.  Number  1  fruits  were  generally  lover  than  the  con- 
centration of  these  cations  in  the  fruits  exhibiting  blossom- 
end  rot* 

It  is  believed  that  results  of  this  study  may  be  of 
value  in  evaluating  and  explaining  the  occurrence  of  certain 
physiological  disorders  and  poor  growth  and  yield  often  ob- 
tained in  many  of  the  commercial  watermelon  fields  in  North 
Central  Florida. 


REFERENCES  CITED 


1.  Andrews,  W.  B.   1937*  The  effect  of  ammonium  sulfate 
on  the  response  of  soybeans  to  lime  and  artificial 
innoculation  and  the  energy  required  of  soybean  nodule 
bacteria.  Jour,  Amer.  Soc.  Agr on.  29:681-689. 

2.  Anonymous.  1954.   Soil  survey,  Alachua  County,  Florida. 
USDA  and  Fla.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  233-235. 

3.  Arnon,  D.  I.  1943.  Mineral  nutrition  of  plants.  Ann. 
Rev.  Biochem.  12:493-528. 

4.  Baver,  L.  D.  1956.  Soil  Physics,  New  York:  John 
Wiley  A  Sons,  Inc.  3rd.  Ed. 

5.  and  Hall,  N.  S.  1937.  Colloidal  properties 

of  soil  organic  matter.  Mo.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Res.  Bull. 
267. 

6.  Bernstein,  L.  and  Hayward,  H.  E.  1958.  Physiology 
of  salt  tolerance.  Ann.  Rev.  Plant  Physiol.  9:1-25. 

7.  Biddulph,  0.,  Cory,  R.,  and  Biddulph,  Susann.  1959. 
Translocation  of  calcium  in  the  bean.  Plant  Physiol. 
34:512-519. 

8.  Blodgett,  F.  H.  1915.  Plant  pathology  and  physiology. 
Texas  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Ann.  Kept.  18. 

9.  Bonner,  James  and  Galston,  Arthur  W.  1952.  Principles 
of  Plant  Physiology.  San  Francisco:  W.  H.  Freeman  and 
Co. 

10.  Bradley,  G.  A.  and  Fleming,  J.  W.  1959.  Fertilization 
and  foliar  analysis  studies  on  watermelons.  Ark.  Agr. 
Expt.  Sta.  Bull.  610. 

11.  Brantley,  B.  B.  1958.  Effects  of  nutrition  and  other 
factors  on  flowering,  fruiting,  and  quality  of  water- 
melons and  muskmelons.  Unpublished  Dissertation, 
Purdue  Univ.,  Dept.  of  Hort. 

12.  Breland,  II.  L.  1957.  Methods  of  analyses  using  soil 
testing.  Fla.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Dept.  Soils  Memo.  Rept. 
No.  58-3. 


90 


91 

13.  Burrus,  R.  II.   1959*   Nitrogen  nutrition.  Ann.  Rev. 
Plant  Physiol.   10:301-328. 

14.  Carolus,  R.  L.  and  Lorenz,  0.  A*   1938.   The  inter- 
relation of  manure,  lime,  and  potash  on  the  growth 
and  maturity  of  the  muskmelon.  Proc.  Amer.  Soc.  Hort. 
Sol.  36:518-522. 

15.  Cochran,  W.  G.  and  Cox,  Gertrude  M.  1957.   Experi- 
mental Designs.  New  York:  Wiley  Publications  in 
Statistics. 

16.  Cooper,  H.  P.  1950.  Effects  of  energy  properties  of 
some  plant  nutrients  on  availability,  on  rate  of 
absorption,  and  on  intensity  of  certain  oxidation- 
reduction  reactions.   Soil  Sci.  69:7-39. 

17.  Cunningham,  Clyde  R.   1939.  Fruit  set  in  watermelons. 
Proc.  Ameri.  Hort.  Sci.  37:811-814. 

18.  Dearborn,  R.  B.   1936.  Nitrogen  nutrition  and  chemi- 
cal composition  in  relation  to  growth  and  fruiting 

of  the  cucumber  plant.  Cornell  Univ.  Agr.  Expt.  Memo. 
192. 

19.  Duncan,  D.  B.   1955.   Multiple  range  and  multiple  F 
test.  Biometrics.  11:1-42. 

20.  Eisenmenger,  W.  S.  and  Kucinski,  K.  J.  1939.  Mag- 
nesium requirements  of  plants.  Mass.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta. 
Ann.  Kept.  10. 

21.  Epstein,  E.  1956.  Mineral  nutrition  of  plants; 
mechanisms  of  uptake  and  transport.  Ann.  Rev.  Plant 
Physiol.  7:1-24. 

22.  Everett,  P.  H.  and  Geraldson,  C.  M.  1958.  Fertilizer 
requirements  of  watermelons.  Fla.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Ann. 
Rept.  326-328. 

23.  Fiskell,  J.  G.  A.,  Hortenstine,  C.  C,  Carver,  H.  L., 
and  Lundy,  H.  W.   1958.  Aluminum  studies  on  some  north 
and  central  Florida  soils.  The  Soil  and  Crop  Sci.  Soc. 
of  Fla.,  Proc.  18?166-178. 

24.  and  Robertson,  W.  K.  1957.  Comparison  of 

broadcast  and  row  fertilization  for  potatoes  on  Kanapaha 
fine  sand.  Fla.  State  Hort.  Soc.   70:96-103. 

25.  Fried,  M.  and  Peech,  M.  1946.  The  comparative  effects 
of  gypsum  upon  plant  growth  in  acid  soils.  Jour.  Amer. 
Soc.  Agron.   38:614-623. 


92 

26.  Geraldson,  C.  M.  1957.  Symptoms  of  nutritional  dis- 
orders in  vegetable  plants.  Fla.  Agr.  Expt.  St a.  Ann. 
Rept.  296. 

27.  .  1957.  Control  of  blossom-end  rot  of  toma- 
toes. Proc.  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.  69:309-317. 

28.  Hall,  C.  B.,  Nettles,  V.  P.,  and  Dennison,  R.  A. 
1951.  Fertilizer  requirements  for  watermelons.  Fla. 
Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Progress  Rept.  (Misc.). 

29.  ,  ,  and  .  1955.  Fertilizer 

requirements  for  watermelons.  Fla.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta. 
Ann.  Rept.  113. 


.  • 


30.  Hall,  W.  C.  1949.  Effects  of  photoperiod  and  nitro- 
gen supply  on  growth  and  reproduction  in  the  gherkin. 
Plant  Physiol.  24:753-769. 

31.  Hardh,  J.  E.  1957.  On  the  calcium  uptake  of  glass- 
house cucumbers.  Maataloust  Aikakausk.  29:238-242 
(Hort.  Abs.  Vol.  28,  No.  1419). 

32.  Hart man,  John  O,  and  Gay lord,  F.  C.  1940.  Soil 
acidity  for  muskmelons  and  sweetpotatoes  on  sand.  Proc. 
nraer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.  37:841-845. 

33.  Hartman,  John  D.  and  Gaylord,  F.  C.  1941.  Soil  acidity 
for  watermelons  on  sand.  Proc.  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci. 
38:623-625. 

34.  Hartwell,  B.  L.  and  Damon,  S.  C.  1914.  The  comparative 
effect  on  different  kinds  of  plants  of  liming  an  acid 
soil.  R.  I.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Bull.  160. 

35.  Hasler,  A.  and  Maurizio,  A.  1951.  The  influence  of 
various  nutrients  on  budding,  nector  secretion,  and 
yield  of  seeds  of  honey  plants,  especially  winter  rape 
(Brass! ca  nanua).   Schweiz.  Bienen-Z.  74:208-219 

(C.  A.  Vol.  49,  No.  4091g). 

36.  Heslop,  Harrison  J.  1957.  The  Experimental  Modifica- 
tions of  Sex  Expression  in  Flowering  Plants.  Biol. 
Review.   32:38-90. 

37.  Hoagland,  D.  R.  and  Arnon,  D.  I.  1950.  The  Water- 
culture  Method  for  Growing  Plants  without  Soil.  Calif. 
Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Cir.  347. 

38.  Holmes,  R.  S.  1943.  Copper  and  zinc  content  of  cer- 
tain United  States  soils.  Soil  Sci.  56:359-370. 


03 

39.  Horn,  G.  C.   1955.   Some  factors  affecting  the  accuracy 
of  the  flame  spectrophotometrlc  determination  of  mag- 
nesium in  soils.  Unpyblished  Dissertation.  Univ.  of 
Fla. 

40.  Jamison,  F.  S.  and  Nettles,  V.  F.   1940.   Phenol ogical 
studies  on  truck  crops  in  Florida.  Fla.  Agr.  Expt. 
Sta.  Ann.  Rept.  86-87. 

41.  Kimbrough,  W.  D.   1930.   The  effect  of  fertiliser  on 
the  quality  of  watermelons.   Plant  Physiol.  5:373-385. 

42.  Knott,  J.  E.   1957.  Handbook  for  Vegetable  Growers. 
New  York:  John  Wiley  and  Sons,  Inc.  36. 

43.  Langston,  Ruble.   1956.  Radioisotopes  in  plants. 
Proc.  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.   68:370-376. 

44.  Laties,  George  G.   1959.   Active  transport  of  salt  into 
plant  tissue.   Ann.  Rev.  Plant  Physiol.   10:87-112. 

45.  Loehwing,  W.  F.  1938.  Physiological  aspects  of  sex  S 
in  angiosperms.  Bot.  Rev.   4:581-625. 

46.  Marshall,  C.  E.   1948.   Ionization  of  calcium  from 
soil  colloids  and  its  bearing  on  soil-plant  relation- 
ships.  Soil  Sci.   65:57-68. 

47.  Mazaeva,  M.  M.   1957.   Effect  of  magnesium  fertiliza-    >" 
tion  and  its  role  in  plants.  Botan.  Zhur.  42:571-582 
(C.  A.  Vol.  51,  No.  1842g). 

48.  Meyer,  B.  S.  and  Anderson,  D.  B.  1952.  Plant  Physiology. 
New  York:  D.  Van  Nostrand  Company,  Inc.  Second  Edition. 

49.  Meyers,  H.  E.  1937.  Physio chemical  reactions  between 
organic  and  inorganic  soil  colloids  as  related  to 
aggregate  formation.   Soil  Sci.  44:331-359. 

50.  Miller,  Edwin  C.   1938.  Plant  Physiology.   New  York- 
London:  McGraw-Hill  Book  Company,  Inc. 

51.  Minina,  E.  G.   1938.  On  the  phenotypical  modification 
of  sex  characters  in  higher  plants  and  other  external 
factors.   C.  R.  Acad.  Sci.   USSR  21:298-301  (C.  A.  Vol. 
33,  No.  4292). 

52.  Morazov,  A.  S.   1938.  Effect  of  sodium  chloride  and 
sodium  sulfate  on  sugar  content  of  melons.  Compt.  Rend, 
Acad.  Sci.   USSR  21:279-281  (C.  A.  Vol.  33,  No.  3950). 

53.  Nettles,  V.  F.  and  Halsey,  L.  H.   1958.  Fertilizer  Re- 
quirements of  watermelons.  Fla.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Ann. 
Rept.  172-173. 


S 


94 

54.  Nightingale,  6.  T.   1937.   The  nitrogen  nutrition  of 
green  plants.  Bot.  Rev.  3:85-174. 

55.  Over street,  Roy  and  J a cob son,  Louis.  1952.  Mechanisms 
of  ion  absorption  by  roots.  Ann.  Rev.  Plant  Physiol. 
3:189-206. 

56.  Parris,  6.  K.  1952.  Diseases  of  watermelons.  Fla. 
Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Bull.   491. 

57.  Patterson,  D.  R.  and  Smith,  Oliver  E.  1958.  High 
potash  rates  boost  watermelon  yet Ids.   Better  Crops 
42:12-15. 

58.  Peech,  M.  and  Bradfield,  R.  1943.  The  effect  of  lime 
and  magnesia  on  the  soil  potassium  and  on  the  absorption 
of  potassium  by  plants.   Soil  Scl.   55:37-48. 

59.  Pierre,  W.  II.  and  Bower,  C.  A.  1943.   Potassium  ab- 
sorption by  plants  as  affected  by  cat ionic  relationships. 
Soil  Sci.   55:23-36. 

60.  Porter,  D.  R.,  Bisson,  C.  S.,  and  Allinger>  H.  W.  1940. 
Factors  affecting  the  total  soluble  solids,  reducing 
sugars,  and  sucrose  in  watermelons.  Hllgardia  13: di- 
61. Purvis,  E.  R.  and  Ruprecht,  R.  W.  1937.   Cracked  stem 

of  celery.  Fla.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Bull.  307. 

62.  Reynolds,  C.  W.  and  Stark,  F.  C.  1953.  Growth  and 
fruiting  responses  of  cucumbers  to  varying  levels  of 
Ca,  K,  Mg,  and  N  in  sand  culture.  Proc.  Assoc,  of 
So.  Agr.  Workers.  133-134. 

63.  Richards,  F.  J.   1944.  Mineral  nutrition  of  plants. 
Ann.  Rev.  Blochem.   13:611-630. 

64.  Sabinln,  1).  A*  1937.  La  nutrition  minerale  comme      / 
facteur  of  mophogenes.  Bull.  Soc.  Nat.  Moscow,  Sect. 
Biol.   46:67-76  (C.  A.  Vol.  31,  No.  5843). 

65.  Schmehl,  W.  R.,  Peech,  Michael  and  Bradfield,  Richard. 
1950.   Causes  of  poor  growth  of  plants  on  acid  soils 
and  beneficial  effects  of  liming:   I  Evaluation  of 
factors  responsible  for  acid— soil  injury.   Soil  Sci. 
70:393-410. 

66.  Sharpies,  G.  C.  and  Foster,  R.  E.  1958.   The  growth  and 
composition  of  cantaloupe  plants  in  relation  to  the  Ca 
saturation  percentage  and  N  levels  of  the  soil.  Proc. 
Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.   72:417-425. 


95 

67.   Shear,  C.  B.  and  Crane,  H.  L.   1954.   Inorganic  nu- 
trition of  plants  with  special  reference  to  inter- 
action among  elements.  Unpublished  Manuscript,  1-40. 

68 •   — —i *  and  Meyers,  T.  A.   1946.   Nutrient 

element  balance:  A  fundamental  concept  in  plant  nu- 
trition.  Proc.  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.   47:239-248. 

69 '•  .  .   *  »   and  .   1953.   Nutrient  ele- 
ment balance:   response  of  tung  trees  grown  in  sand 
culture  to  potassium,  magnesium,  calcium,  and  their 
interactions.  USDA  Tech.  Bull.  No.  1085. 

70.  Smith,  G.  L.  and  Mohr,  H.  C.   1953.   Effect  of  dif- 
ferent nutrient  levels  on  the  yield  of  marketable 
black  diamond  watermelons,  1949-52.   Texas  Agr.  Expt. 
Sta.  Progress  Rept.  No.  1589. 

71.  Staker,  E.  V.  and  Cummings,  R.  W.  1941.   The  influence 
or  zinc  on  the  productivity  of  certain  New  York  peat 
soils.   Soil  Sci.  Soc.  Amer.  Proc.  6:206-214. 

72.  Stark,  F.  C.  and  Haut,  Irvin  C.   1958  mineral  nutrient 
requirements  of  cantaloupes.  Md.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Bull. 

73.  Stuckey  H.  P.  1924.  Watermelons.  Georgia  Agr.  Expt. 
aia.  £1111  •  143. 

74.  Taylor,  George  A.  and  Smith,  Cyril  B.   1957.  The  use 
of  plant  analysis  in  the  study  of  blossom-end  rot  of 
tomatoes.  Proc.  Amer.  Soc.  Hort.  Sci.  70:341-349. 

75.  Taubenhaus,  J.  J.  1921.  Blossom-end  rot:  division  of 
Plant  pathology  and  physiology.   Texas  Agr.  Expt.  Sta. 
Ann.  Rept.  17-19. 

76.  Thompson,  A.  E.   1955.  Methods  of  producing  first 
generation  hybrid  in  seed  spinach.  Cornell  Agr.  Expt. 
Sta.  Mem.  336.  * 

77.  Tibeau,  M.  E.  1936.  Lime  factor  in  utilization  of 
minerals  by  hemp.  Plant  Physiol.  11:731-747. 

78.  Tiedjens,  V.  A.  1928.  Sex  ratios  in  cucumber  flowers 
as  affected  by  different  conditions  of  soil  and  li^ht. 
Jour.  Agr.  Pes.  36:721-746.  ^ 

?9#  J^S'  A1*ef!;  \952#  ^^ological  bases  for  assess- 
ing the  nutritional  requirements  of  plants.  Ann.  Rev. 
Plant.  Physiol.  3:207-228. 


96 

80.  USDA.  1958.  Vegetables-fresh  market  annual  summary 
acreage,  production  and  value  of  principle  commercial 
crops  by  season  groups  and  states  with  comparisons. 
50-51 •  ' 

81.  Waksman,  Selman  A.  1952.  Soil  Microbiology.  New 
York:  John  Wiley  St   Sons. 

82#  5Ialker#  M*  N»   1931  •   Investigation  and  control  of 
diseases  of  watermelons.  Pla.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Ann. 
Rept.  115. 

83.  Wilkins,  Louis  K.   1917.   High  calcium  content  of 
some  cucurbit  vines.  N.  J.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Bull.  310. 

84.  Wood,  J.  G.  1954.  Nitrogen  metabolism  of  higher 
plants.  Ann.  Rev.  Plant  Physiol.  5:1-22. 

85.  Woodard,  Otis.  1954.  Factors  influencing  white- 
heart  in  watermelons.  Atlantic  Coast  Line  Agr.  and 
Livestock  Topics.  6: (April)  3-4. 

86.  Wright.  K.  E.  1937.  Effects  of  phosphorus  and  lime 
in  reducing  aluminum  toxicity  of  acid  soils.  Plant 
Physiol.   12:173-181. 


APPENDIX  A 
DETAILED  SOIL  TEST  RESULTS  BY  PLOT 


98 


TABLE  31 

THE  pH  AND  THE  POUNDS  PER  ACRE  OF  AVAILABLE  NUTRIENTS 
FROM  SOIL  SAMPLES  TAKEN  IN  WATERMELON  BEDS 
FROM  ALL  FIELD  PLOTS  ON  APRIL  1,  1959 


Treatment   pH 


CaO 


MgO 


p2°5 


K20 


NO. 


CaO 

N0 

CaO 

Nl 

CaO 

4 

cai 

% 

cai 

2l 

Cal 
Ca?, 

N2 
Ng 

Ca2 

Nl 

Ca2 

N2 

CaO 

N0 

CaO 

Nl 

CaO 

4 

C»l 

N0 

"al 

!l 

cai 

N2 

Ca2 

N0 

Ca2 

Nl 

Ca2 

4 

CaO 

NO 

CaO 

Nl 

CaO 

N2 

Cal 

Nn 

Cai  Nl 

Cal 

N2 

Ca2  N0 

Ca2  NX 

Ca2 

N2 

CaO 

N0 

CaO 

Nl 

CaO 

N2 

Cax  N0 

Cai 

Nl 

cai 

Ca2 

N0 

Ca2 

Nl 

Ca2  N2 

4.9 

103 

Replication 
73 

I 
85 

229 

L 

5.1 

34 

52 

85 

210 

L 

5.0 

137 

97 

93 

296 

M 

5.4 

434 

73 

88 

191 

L 

5.2 

562 

97 

83 

296 

L 

5.7 

652 

62 

83 

223 

L 

5.9 

1395 

52 

119 

262 

L 

6.0 

2000 

52 

99 

210 

L 

5.8 

1286 

83 

85 

197 

L 

4.8 

68 

Replication 
52 

II 
99 

216 

VL 

5.2 

68 

52 

83 

184 

L 

4.8 

68 

62 

96 

235 

M 

5.4 

434 

62 

68 

310 

L 

5.5 

698 

83 

96 

296 

L 

5.5 

562 

62 

116 

255 

M 

5.8 

2000 

124 

76 

296 

L 

5.9 

1772 

83 

101 

338 

M 

6.2 

2224 

73 

90 

216 

L 

5.2 

Replication 
698     216 

III 
90 

352 

VL 

4.8 

350 

152 

83 

269 

L 

4.8 

308 

182 

78 

248 

VL 

5.2 

350 

97 

76 

204 

L 

5.3 

562 

97 

108 

262 

M 

5.1 

562 

152 

67 

210 

L 

5.5 

837 

97 

93 

242 

L 

5.6 

932 

62 

67 

165 

M 

5.5 

2910 

199 

96 

262 

VL 

4.8 

68 

Replication 
62 

IV 

99 

255 

VL 

4.8 

137 

83 

108 

242 

L 

4.7 

68 

52 

76 

210 

L 

5.1 

273 

62 

76 

197 

VL 

5.5 

789 

83 

70 

216 

VL 

5.2 

741 

73 

96 

216 

L 

5.9 

1030 

73 

101 

248 

VL 

5.8 

1340 

62 

128 

210 

M 

5.7 

1449 

111 

93 

235 

L 

99 


TABLE  32 


THE  pH  AND  THE  POUNDS  PER  ACRE  OF  AVAILABLE  NUTRIENTS 
FROM  SOIL  SAMPLES  TAKEN  ON  EACH  SIDE  OF  THE 
BED  FROM  ALL  PLOTS  ON  APRIL  1,  1959 


Treatment 

pH 

CaO 

MgO 

P205 

K20 

N03 

Replication 

I 

CaO  N0 

4.7 

34 

41 

54 

30 

L 

CaO  N, 

4.9 

68 

52 

55 

47 

L 

CaO  N2 

4.7 

34 

62 

51 

65 

M 

CaX  N0 

5.1 

137 

62 

46 

65 

M 

Cai  Nx 

5.1 

308 

97 

49 

59 

M 

Cai  N2 

4.8 

68 

52 

52 

59 

M 

Cao  Nq 

5.2 

239 

62 

52 

47 

M 

Ca2  Nx 

5.3 

239 

73 

61 

24 

M 

Ca2  Nj 

5.0 

103 

41 
Replication 

49 
II 

59 

L 

CaO  N0 

5.0 

34 

31 

46 

41 

VL 

CaO  Ni 

4.9 

68 

41 

54 

41 

L 

CaO  N2 

4.8 

34 

31 

45 

47 

VL 

Cai  N0 

5.0 

68 

41 

46 

35 

L 

Cai  Nx 

5.1 

137 

97 

44 

47 

L 

Cax  N2 

4.9 

68 

41 

51 

35 

M 

Ca2  N0 

5.0 

171 

83 

43 

53 

L 

Ca2  Nx 

5.0 

137 

62 

46 

53 

L 

Ca2  4 

5.1 

103 

41 
Replication 

48 
III 

41 

VL 

CaO  N0 

5.2 

652 

253 

44 

152 

L 

CaO  Nx 

4.8 

137 

138 

51 

127 

VL 

CaO  N2 

4.9 

239 

216 

48 

172 

VL 

Cai  N0 

5.0 

103 

97 

49 

102 

L 

Cat  NV 

5.0 

171 

83 

51 

47 

VL 

Cai  N2 

4.9 

205 

166 

45 

77 

VL 

Ca2  N0 

4.8 

103 

62 

54 

65 

VL 

Ca2  NX 

4.8 

103 

41 

48 

41 

VL 

Ca2  N2 

4.9 

434 

166 
Replication 

44 
IV 

90 

L 

CaO  N0 

4.7 

34 

52 

55 

53 

VL 

CaO  Ni 

4.7 

68 

52 

60 

59 

L 

CaO  N2 

4.8 

68 

62 

60 

24 

VL 

Cax  N0 

4.9 

68 

31 

55 

30 

VL 

Cai  Nl 

4.9 

137 

83 

49 

59 

VL 

Cai  N2 

5.0 

68 

41 

55 

35 

VL 

Ca2  N0 

5.1 

103 

41 

57 

30 

VL 

Ca2  Ni 

5.1 

103 

52 

49 

30 

VL 

Ca2  N2 

4.9 

103 

73 

51 

41 

VL 

APPENDIX  B 
ANALYSES  OF  VARIANCE  TABLES 


101 


n 

w 

9 


3 


« 


25 

01 

« 

01 

CM 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

• 

• 

• 

o 

© 
• 

o 

« 

• 

s 

m 
to 

CO 

o 

o 

m 

o 

• 

• 

• 

o 

o 
* 

o 

• 

« 

00 

o 

o 

w 

o 

ft 

• 

• 

• 

o 

H 

* 
» 

o 

to 

a 

* 

o 

to 

o 

• 

• 

• 

o 

10 

o 

* 

* 

CO 

to 

GO 

o 

• 

• 

t» 

o 

01 

0 

► 


© 

o 


in 


w 


01 


OB 


B  « 

O  •*» 
•H  C 

88  (H 
«  A 

O 

4 


u 
© 

fa 


to 
n 


1-4 

a 
o 

H 


ft 

© 

TS 

oS 

s 

bfl 

0) 

© 

E 

*J 

OJ 

fl 

G 

C 

w 

c 

08 

§ 

M 
• 

o 

•H 

XJ 

44 

© 

8 

no  to 

•H 

H 

0 

©  CO  00 

g 

© 

•H 

©     •     • 

8 

fc.  01  W 

•H 

c 

M 

M 

OJ 

o 

a)  as  » 

# 

■H 

8 

"B  iHiH 

* 

C 
4 

08 

eg  e8 

to  S  B 

% 

A 

OJ   CO" 

0  0 

-B 

i-t 

• 

B 
efl 

9 

> 

O 

8  t-t  i-t 

© 

A 

E 

a)  0  « 

ft 

8* 

^ 

>  ► 

+» 

IC  0  0 

1ft 

e 

rH  H 

O 

E 

-a 

L 

• 

A 

© 

OlOH 

o 

■♦» 

W 

4h  O  O 

09 

•    • 

t» 

Xt 

a 

ooo 

a 

© 

Pi 

•H 

8 
OS 
O 


& 


o 

8 

0 
0 

ft 

ft 


0  OS  c8 

E 

© 

0 


«      co      en 

#       08        fit 


102 


TABLE  34 

THE  ANALYSES  OF  VARIANCE  OF  THE  OVEN  DRY  WEIGHTS  OF 
VINES,  ROOTS.  AND  TOTAL  WEIGHT  (VINES,  ROOTS, 
AND  FRUITS)  OF  GREENHOUSE  EXPERIMENT 


Degrees  of 
freedom 

Mean 

square) 

9a 

Source  of 

variation 

Vines 

Roots 

Total  weight 
(vines, roots, 
fruits) 

Replication 
Ca  level s* 

Linear 

Quadrati < 

Cubic 

Residual 
Error 

3 
6 

1 

3     1 
1 
3 
18 

160.7 
617.9 
2340.6** 
33.7 
434.4 
224.6 
135.3 

1.66 

4.05 

9.29* 

4.31 

6.93* 

1.26 

1.37 

440.9 
496.5 
6.5 
917.1 
1229.1 
277.8 
304.7 

Total 

27 

MftV^S 

•»«»«• 



♦Significant  at  0.05  level,  **signif leant  at  0.01 
level. 

aVariance  ratio  for  1  and  18  degrees  of  freedom: 
F  at  0.05  level  equals  4.41 
F  at  0.01  level  equals  8.28 

^Effects  were  determined  by  using  log  x  as  the  in- 
dependent variable,  where  x  equals  the  concentration  of 
calcium  in  the  nutrient  solution  in  ppm. 


103 


TABLE  35 

THE  ANALYSES  OF  VARIANCE  FOR  THE  NUMBER  OF  STAMINATE, 
PISTILLATE,  AND  RATIO  OF  STAMINATE  TO  PIS- 
TILLATE FLOWERS  PRODUCED  IN  THE 
GREENHOUSE  EXPERIMENT 


Source  of 

Degrees  of 
freedom 

Mean 

squares 

variation 

Staminate 

Pistillate 

S:P  ratio 

Replication 
Ca  levels 
Error 

3 
6 

18 

1.72 

8.89** 

0.62 

0.44 

3.23** 

0.22 

0.11 

3.04** 

0.16 

Total 

27 



«»«•«» 



**Significant  at  0.01  level. 

Variance  ratio  for  6  and  18  degrees  of  freedom: 

F  at  0.05  level  equals  2.66 
F  at  0.01  level  equals  4.01. 


104 


© 
co 

9 


fa 
O 

n 

0) 

fa  m 

3  o 
c-o 
a  fa 

8 

© 


fa 
O 

» 
© 
fa  so 

3  ft 

to 


J? 


c 

© 


fa 

O 

v< 

« 

©  n 
fa  © 

2  ► 

9  sJ 
o<® 

«H 

© 


co 
o 


* 


M 


JT 


M 


cO 
u 


»  ©  ©  «  CM  *•  © 

nnooooo 

O  O  H  O  O  O  O 
•     •••••• 

oo  oo  o  o  o 


CM  ©  HCM  »©^ 


OH00O 


•    •     • 
OO  o 


* 

* 

to  m  © 

1-4  CO  t' 

•  •     • 

O  r-t  CO 

HOIR 
CM1*  © 
O  ©  H 

•  •    • 

o  OO 


Cit'tOt- 

©  "tf  -*  H 


O  C- 
CM 


o  o 


©  CM  l>  © 

in  o  ho 
o  oo  o 

•     ♦     •     • 

o  o  o  o 


^oo^hooo 

©  CM  Hfr-  H©  CO 

•  •••••• 

oooo  OO  o 

CM  ©  ©  AHHOO 
HO©H  OHO 

O  ©  01  o  o  o  o 

•  •••••• 

o  o  oo  oo  o 

^  Q  ft  CM  fc-O  © 

•  •••••• 

O  H©  HOO  O 


©  0>  ©  T*  CO  CO  © 
O  £>  ©  ©  ©  O  H 

•  •••••• 

O  H  0»  O  O  O  O 

#    i 

H  ©  ©  O  CM  CO  O 
W  O  OOH©  i*  CO 

•  •••••• 

©  ©  ©  o^»  o  o 

HO 


o 

E 

to  o 

©•8 
©  9 

^© 
fa 
©«_, 


4* 
O 

8 


e  c« 

CO    > 


CO  © 


HHHC0 


© 


03  O 

C  H        H 

OP  ♦>        cJ 

«H  eo  fa  at       S 

■*»H  oJ  fa  0*3 

eO  ©  c9  tHtI 
© ► c  cop m 

•h  ©-5  a  3  ©  fa 
HH.-lo'oa;  o 
ft 
o  a 

as  © 


CM 


H 

0) 

+» 
O 
H 


2 

9 

* 

* 

9 

H 

P 

at 

•H 

fa    • 

£ft 

ft 

V 

B  8 

©  H 

rs 

E  8 

9  O 

ftH 

©  V 

T3  3 

BH 

#6 

•H  e 

■ 

OS 

i 

9 

•« 

Xii» 

s 

■*»  B 
9 

fa 
fal 

St 

9 

%j 

M  S 

o 

8 
W 

O  9 

WH© 

©^  CM 

HA 

«    • 

• 

•♦» 

fa^CO 

8  B 

©  BO 

01 

•H-H 

"3 

H 

00 

3  § 

• 

©  3 

3 

H 

H  ©«©• 

>»-H 

• 

i 

© 

p  8 

► 

-o 

H 

© 

SHH 

X>   CO 

©  © 

H 

a  © 

© 

> 

► 

8 

H 

H  © 

© 

■HW 

O 
• 

ftr-t 

fa 

g8 

o 

O©  H 

©  s 

<~  o  o 

♦»    © 

*» 

• 

• 

©T« 

9) 

ooc 

•a  •»» 

<H 

«0 

*> 

+»«*  * 

©  fa 

c 

CO  CO 

a) 

fa  -P 

•H 

fa 

©  8 

© 

*s 

<« 

0 

■  8 

E 

s 

(0 

> 

feet 
e   oo 

00 

« 

* 

a 

p 
m 

H 
g 

©• 

• 

105 


TABLE  37 

THE  ANALYSES  OF  VARIANCE  FOR  CALCIUM,  POTASSIUM,  AND 
MAGNESIUM  IN  THE  FRUITS  OF  THE 
GREENHOUSE  EXPERIMENT 


Source  of 

Degrees  of 

Mean 

squaresa 

variation 

freedom 

Ca 

I 

Mg 

Replications 
Ca  levels* 

Linear 

Quadratic 

Cubic 

Residual 
Error 

3 
4 

1 
1 
1 

1 
12 

0.001 

0.037 

0.141** 

0.003 

0.000 

0.004 

0.001 

0.10 
0.14 
0.05 
0.01 
0.38 
0.04 
0.23 

0.002 

0.010 

0.040** 

0.000 

0.001 

0.000 

0.002 

Total 

19 







♦♦Signif leant  at  0.01  level. 

aVariance  ratio  for  1  and  12  degrees  of  freedom: 

F  at  0.05  level  equals  4.75 
F  at  0.01  level  equals  9.33 

"Effects  were  determined  by  using  log  x  as  the  in- 
dependent variable,  where  x  equals  the  concentration  of 
calcium  in  the  nutrient  solution  in  ppm. 


00 

3 


%■?  w 


05 


^Iflrt 


>>3  cd 

bOH 


& 


^  01  00 
(H  CO  00 

in  o  oo 

CO  00  © 
OOHfH 


HiHCD 

•    •     • 

CMCMO 

hco  co 


W  i-IW 

•     •     • 

cm  ^  a 

CM 


in  m  t- 
eo  •#  co 
o>  ©cm 

in  co  in 

t»  r-4H 


t>on 

•     •     • 

CO  o  o 
oca  h 

H       CM 


oo  m  in 

•  •  • 

HO  05 

CO  CM  00 

CO 


* 


moo     t>  o>  in  ^  o  co 


00  Tf  t»      i>  o>      ^  cm      i*  o  co  o  co  co 

H  H  H 


O  00 
CO  <# 
t»CM 

CO  O) 

CO 


CM  CM 

•     • 

cm  »n 

HiH 


«>H 

oco 

CMH 


* 

05M 

C-C0 


* 


# 
* 

m  co 

•   • 

COr-t 


* 

m  co 

•  • 

CO  CO 

in  co 
cm 


in  cm 

CMO 

iHt* 

CM 


in  o 

•  • 

CM  00 


CO  00 

•    • 

CM  T^ 


00  ^T 


fHCM 


00  CO  c-  co©^ 

CMC0OOC0H 
CO       O  CO  t-  Q 


t*  ao  co  oo^w 
•  ••••• 

ho  a  in  -#  m 

1HH1H 


WO  CO  CO  coco 
•     ••••• 

in  o  co  co  in  m 


^  oo  o  in  o»oo 

OOHOOOO 
CM  CM"*  Oi  00  OS 

h     h  co<#  in 


CO  O  <cF  00*  01 

1 

•     ••••• 

1 

O  O  CO  *  t>  00 

1 

H       H 

*  ©     nt-^HCDO) 

OC0       HOC0IOHH 

t-*     co     in  win  in 


co  oo 


colH^i 


'  C  3 
CD  *4 
E  © 
*»  r»» 

a>o 
E 

H 


COCO 

HH 


S  3 

©  ©  C  Ob 

■H  -HO     JJ  Of  Cf      E 

♦2  -  .  *2  ^  *  *  *  *  *  • 

rt  C  tU  aJ  ♦»  o 

CD  "C3    tO  ©  tJ    rt  r-t   > 

c  «i  p  c  3  s,   ^a^iJoto-H 

•H3S*«H3©aJdaJ  «T     *» 
hiff^h)of*>cooo  «  © 

■H  C  h   © 


S 


106 


m 
co 


H 
C8 

O 
H 


CD 


O 
•  •• 

O  B 

O 

at  « 

i 

C«M 

a) 

©  Cm 

•H  O 

Cm 

•H  »OJ  CO 

c  »^in 

bp  ©     •    • 
•Hfc*  00 

as  ho 
•  a>  co  as 

*CO  3  3 
HHCrC 
CD         CD   CD 

©  CiHH 
H  3  CD   CD 

>  ► 
in  r-l  CD  CD 
O        Hrt 

OOIOH 

Cm  O  O 

*»  •    • 

rt  O  O  O 

•H 
4*  ♦»  «*  ♦» 
g  at  4  « 

•S  cp^1^ 

Cm   © 


5 


00   aj 

♦  > 


107 


•  *» 

O    <D 

*  « 

% 

C  ca 

l>  lO  i-t 

0>  l> 

'f  00 

o  0)  t-  oo  co  o 

1 

CO 

•     •     • 

•     • 

•     • 

•  ••••• 

1 

i 

H  •♦» 

t-  <*  CO 

"f  o 

fc-  lO 

lOHOiOO^ 

1 

11 

Q«H 

o  01 

lO  ^ 

HiH 

(HO        CO  OOOi 

PM 

"*  rHCM 

CO  01 

9)  © 

H   %4 

H 

MM 

I 

3h 

| 

ie 

O  +» 

m  o 

lO  ©  CO 

o  © 

iH  © 

<#  oi  o  in  coo 

1 

H  as 

05    i- 

•    •     • 

•     • 

•     • 

•    ••••• 

1 

OH 

0 

0>  HCO 

00  CM 

to  © 

O  H  IQ  01  O  O 

1 

CO  a;     « 

i-tTJ 

©  co  to 

CO  CM 

01  CO 

_.        H 

-O  c 

H 

l-l 

H 

td     •»© 

1 

3S* 

V2. 

ggg 

m 

a  a  a 

m  a 

o  o  i  as 

«  © 

§x§w 

«  i 

# 

•O   fi   1 

00  CO  CO 

<*  o 

©* 

fcO  £>  O  l>  HH 

0.OWH 

CO  HW 

CM    T* 

HO 

O  O  O  CO  0101 

1 

■HOW 

•     •     • 

•     • 

•     • 

•    ••••• 

I 

BS  H  ©CO 
OOH 

CC  H  «9 
A   O 

ooo 

H  O 

OO 

o  o  OO  OO 

1 

•• 

fe««BH 

+»  H 
A3 

■ 

O 

CO  P  W  p  25 

•5 

H  SoOtf  W 

^ 

© 

3       H       H 

pftifcafi 

E 

© 

CJ 

T3   •   O 

c 

Cx 

co 

a? o  a  ©a 

■H   ©  *» 

fc»  to  © 

CO  oi 

©  CO 

o  o 

CO  CM  HO  ©^ 

WHO        ft. 

•  ©    1 

©HP 

ooo 

o  o 

•HOO#H*© 

1 

U 

a 

25  co  w 
ssaa  cs  a 

<  33  a,  a 

•     •     • 

ooo 

•     • 

oo 

•     • 

oo 

•    ••••• 

oooooo 

1 
1 

O 

«  OS  CO 

WH       MP 

a  <:§  §h 
Sab 

<  **  -p 

©     •     • 

fc.  ^  00 

©  ■  to 

UK  O  H  S 

© 

,©   0) 

t>  0»«O 

(0  iH 

00  CO 

OHfOHU) 

• 

•©  HH 

ed  ca 
co  3  3 

BE  ©CO  ©  H 
H  CO  CO  H 

3  XI 

O  ^  CM 

©  CO 

«#  CO 

O  O  r-JiHCO  CO 

1 

iH 

ih  o*  a* 

H  H 

•     •    • 

•     • 

•     • 

•    ••••• 

1 

© 

©  © 

3:  <}  O 

O  1-4 

HO© 

o  o 

o  o 

©  o  o  OOO 

1 

► 

-0 

0>   © 
09 

• 

CHH 

a  ©  © 

CO             H 

\& 

>  ► 

co  a 

to 

rH   ©   © 

a  co  up 

O 

H  iH 

g§Hi 

u 

o 

• 
O 

O  tO  H 

a%% 

■ 

09   © 

1 

1 

+> 

«H  O  O 

•      • 

5  aco 

©  TJ 

01 

hh:i 

Hrt* 

H»H»-liH 

CO 

OOO 

©   « 

CO  CO  00 

1 

co  co 

10 

•H 

>HC0 

b   © 

t-iH 

CO 

V 

<♦»  •♦*  *» 

a 

t»0  m 

E 

fe  P  25 

©  <M 

CO 

c 

O  25 

H 

CO  QC 

P 

-a 
© 

h 
O 

0 

H 

Cm 

s 

a 
co  a 

■ 

© 

©  B 

(h   O 

©  (4 

H 
B 

3 

^9 

S 

H 

H  © 

h3h3  C'Gf       b 

bO 

•H 

li 

a-<-» 

«■ 

4»H2! 

H 

L 

O  T3 

h   to  B 

U    <3*> 

© 

09 

CD 

's 

Ch   B 

H   ttt»  B 

Ibl 

aSfc,©X^XXO© 

• 

> 

o  o 

■p^  fi  3 

©  -a  to  « 

H  > 

..   < 

H 

0}        ©H 

E    (9  O 

E   C3  U 

H  O?  h3  CA©  H 

©  V 

©0JE©H3*-H3© 

ce)  <c  c9  rt      *» 

sd 

©    CO 

THlMvH^a'4)i^ai4>uuuo  «  © 

(H 

w 

U  -H 

H  ©  as  co 

H 

a 

U  9 

CO 

3  J- 

P.  o  ©O 

S 

N 

#£ 

+» 

O   CO 
1    CO    ► 

«H(. 

5^  , 

0 

a:  AH 

H 

108 


2 


3 

9 
9 


OB 
0. 

§ 

«H 

•♦» 

u 

o 

£ 

« 

M 

• 

u 

© 

0 

cc 

i 

© 

H 

o 

1 

© 

£ 

86 

« 
> 

V 

0 

0 

H 

fa 

© 

«4 

M 

09 

© 

a* 

i 

© 

o 

B 

(II 

i 

X 

% 

e 

a 

n  o 

©  T3 

Q>  © 

In    © 

bfifc. 

©Cm 

P 

«H     S 

o  © 

«H 

83 

a** 

©    flS 

0) 

► 

0.016 
0.001 

000*0 
X00*0 

0.001 
0.000 

HOI  "<*  CO  CM 

OOOOO 

OOOOO 

.    .    •    .    • 

OOOOO 

0.91 
0.36 

0.810**  0.09 
0.005        0.02 

0.01 
1.76 

IO  H  O  CO  CO 

lonnoto 
•  •  .  .  . 

OOOOO 

0.006 
0.136 

0.001 
0.022 

0.046 
0.087 
0.103 
0.013 
0.034 

.051 
.027 

.115* 
.011 

.010 
.002 

# 

OlHC&Tf  t- 

fiOHOO 

OOOOO 

•     .     .     •     • 

OO 

OO 

OO 

OOOOO 

<0O 
HO 

•    • 

.20* 
.55 

C001 

CO  o 

.     . 

an*  to  oio 

OOO  HOI 
•    .    .    .    . 

o  o 

HO 

OO 

OOOOO 

00  o 

•    • 

«  * 

*  * 
00  01 
0><0 

.     . 

• 
* 

00  CO 

•     • 

Hr-t  CM  tO  CO 

^  OO  OH 

.    •    .    .    • 

on 

0>  CM 
H 

HO 

OOOOO 

OMH  H  CMjH  H  *JH  ri  r-<  i-t 


01 


c 
© 


HS525S5" 


crar 


©  ©  fa  ox*** 

fefl  ©  TJ    OS 

o  c  a  u 


<0  ©  ©  oS 
O  O  O  O  fa 

o 

g 


io 

CO 


01 

o 

H 


• 
H 

« 

► 

© 

H 

H 

O 

• 

•  • 

O 

■ 

O 

-** 

XI 

© 

© 

© 

<*> 

E 

C 

u 

03 

O 

*M 

«H 

o 

V< 

«H 

©to  CM 

s 

©01  CO 

bfl 

8)     .     • 

•H 

fa"«t> 

at 

w 

* 

©   »    00 

* 

-©  i-tr-i 

a  © 

% 

^33 

H 

01  ©•©• 

© 

©  « 

► 

"O 

© 

CHH 
©  ©   9 

H 

►  ► 

to 

H  ©  © 

O 

HH 

• 

fa 

o 

OIOH 

Cm  OO 

*» 

•     . 

© 

OOO 

•H 

•♦» 

♦»♦>  V 

fl 

©  ^  © 

oj 

c 

o 

M.    A 

•H 

S 

•H 
«H 

9 
t 

CO 

© 

* 

► 

109 


2 


00  o 

op 
o  5 

•  • 

o  o 


ON 

oo  co 

•   • 

o  o 


oo 
oo 

•     • 

oo 


oo 
oo 

•     • 

o  o 


OS  00 
CO  o 

•     • 

o  o 


in  to 

HO 

oo 

•     • 

oo 


* 

iHH 

oo 


oooo  o 
o  oooo 


o  o     o  o  o  o  o 


* 

0)O 

t-  w 

•     • 
OO 


co  to 

OH 

OO 


co  ooH-tf  oo 

O  CO  CO  O  iH 
•     •     •     •     • 

o  oo  o  o 


HH<0OtS 
HOO  O  O 

©oooo 


o  o     o  oo  o  o 


« 


00 
CM 

o 

•     • 

oo 


00  «o 
c-o 

•    • 
OH 


in  t* 

•     • 

CM  O 

CM 


0>iH 

00  © 

oo 

•     • 

o  o 


*  # 

*  * 

CO  0> 

o  m 

•     • 

in  ,h 


*  * 

CO  w 

•     • 

t-o 

CM  CM 


•HO 

coo 
oo 

•     • 

oo 


HCM 

HO 


H  t>  C-CO  CM 

cm  o  in  h  m 
o  ooo  o 

•     •    •     •     • 

oooo  o 


0)  ooo  o 

cm  o  o  m  ih 


oo     oo  oo  o 


oin 

•    • 

oo 


<*  t-  m  o  o 

•     •     •     •     • 

HOCMCM  H 


coooH'-'H^H' 


CM 


83 


B 

o 

H 

■*» 

J 


o 

H 

•*» 

£-  rt 

■**  §  rt  c 

G  3  OQ 

©h  c  a 
a  oh  3 


o  fl 

h  o   hjJ  o?or 
hss  assess 


H-PH  J  ©J  V»J  Of 
H  «»  «  H  S 

P»©0  2  H 

«  u 


&  Sis  2  «  x  m  ►< 

W  O  T3  rt 
O  C  rt  fc, 
b  H  3   © 


hJc/^G? 
rt  w  rt  CD 
O  CJ  OO  b 

o 
fa 

c 


m 

CO 


© 


o 


rt 

o 

5 


§ 

rs 
0 
© 

fa 


rt 

•*» 
o 

H 


H  O 

H  OB  CO  CM 

C  ©CM  00 

bO  (fi    •    • 

H  fa*C* 

oo  to 

*  ©   ■   CO 

#  V3  r4H 

%  *  3  3 

H  CM  0*Cf 

©  ©  © 

©  Q  HH 

H  rt  ©  © 

m  ho© 

O  r^r-A 

•  fa 

o  ©m  f< 

«-i  oo 

♦j  •  • 

rt  ooo 

H 

•♦*  4*  •*»  4* 

§  £  *  * 

«-.  o 


i 


3  t 

oo       rt 


110 


El) 


J>< 


•  M 


CD 

4* 

M 

«H 

E 

c 

OS! 

1 

H 

1 

i** 

n 

u 

o 

fcl 

• 

o 

09 

a 

o 

c 

1 

0 

X 

09 

1 

I 

c 

H 

« 

O 

£ 

tt 

b 

0 

«4 

« 

a 

i 

cd 

O 

0 

SS 

4h 

O 

6 

»  O 

© « 

o  © 

5*   © 

bflt, 

JC 

<-.  c 

e  e 

H 

ss 

kt 

O  aJ 

0) 

► 

mo 

OH 

o  o 

•  • 

o  o 


CM  t- 
01  CO 

•    • 

oo 


oi  in 

OO 

•    • 

OO 


OlH 
OO 

OO 

•     • 

OO 


00  l> 

O  H 

•    • 

OO 


CO  00 
OO 
OO 

•     • 

o  o 


* 

1H1H 

m  o 

OO 

•     • 

O  o 


Si 


-*m 

OO 

•     • 

OO 


* 

(OO 


*  H  CO 

t-  N  kO  H  H  H 

oooooo 
o  o  o  o  o  o 

•     ••••• 

oooooo 


m  co  ©  o  oi  co 
©corn  ho  oi 


OJO       HO       HOHOO  O 


# 
* 
CO  o 

t>© 

OO 

•     • 

o  o 


<n  h 

OO 


*  * 

in  oi 

•     • 

OO 


« oi 

T*«0 

OO 

•     • 

OO 


HOI 

OO 

•    • 

OO 


* 

H-* 
OO 
OO 

•    • 

o  o 


* 
01  c- 

OH 

•    • 

OO 


*  * 

in  o 

OO 
OO 

•     • 

OO 


t-H^OHlO 
0000)00 

oooooo 

•     ••••• 

oooooo 


-*  OO 
OOHO  O  O 

oooooo 
oooooo 

•     ••••• 

oooooo 


n  H  2>  CD  H« 

OOO  HOO 

•     ••••• 

oooooo 


<*© 

HH01  HO  H 
OOOOOO 

oooooo 

•     ••••• 

oooooo 


CUjH  H  CM  H  H  •>* 


Hr^rii^ 


COW 


§ 

H-t» 

-P  c 

21 

•rtf 
H   « 

P.  © 
«  U 

at  h 


4* 

Mb 
3  ©'a 

t-t  C   cS 
OH  3 


o  s 

H  O 


C  (h   ett  +*  fej 

©dljOXXJXX 

ocdh  ja^a^c 

_fc,H3©««rtcartH 
HjCJ^JCfOOOOH  fci 

d         h  q  AO 

o        a        * 


o 

H 


© 
© 


O 

o 
■»» 

d 

I 

H 

*-, 
H 


H 

«9 


© 

© 

H 

m 

o 
• 

o 


E 
O 
•O 
© 
© 

E 

u 

u 

O 

wcooi 
©M  oo 

©   •   • 

©    »    03 

sis 

oi  &o« 

©  © 

§HH 
©  © 
►  ► 
H  ©  © 
HH 
L 

©in  h 

Cm  O  O 
OOO 


f 

© 

o 

c 
a 

IS 


d  at 

fa  fa 


BIOGRAPHICAL  NOTES 

Willie  Estel  Waters  was  torn  September  10,  1931,  in 
Smithtovn,  McCreary  County,  Kentucky.  He  received  his  ele- 
mentary education  in  the  public  school  of  Smithtovn,  Kentucky, 
He  was  graduated  from  McCreary  County  High  School  in  1950. 

He  entered  Cumberland  Junior  College  in  September, 
1950,  and  was  graduated  in  May,  1952.  He  entered  the  Uni- 
versity  of  Kentucky  the  same  year  and  was  graduated  in  June, 
1954,  with  a  Bachelor  of  Science  Degree  in  Agriculture. 

He  married  Mary  Elizabeth  Sunder  of  Sanford,  Florida, 
in  May,  1952. 

From  June,  1954,  to  December,  1954,  he  worked  as  an 
Assistant  County  Agricultural  Agent  in  Perry  County,  Kentucky. 
He  served  with  the  United  States  Army  Medical  Corps  from 
December,  1954,  to  September,  1956. 

He  entered  the  Graduate  School  of  the  University  of 
Kentucky  in  1956,  and  completed  the  requirements  for  the 
Master  of  Science  Degree  in  Agriculture  in  January,  1958. 
He  entered  Graduate  School  of  the  University  of  Florida  in 
February,  where  he  has  since  been  working  toward  the  degree 
of  Doctor  of  Philosophy. 

He  was  employed  as  a  research  assistant  by  the  Uni- 
versity of  Kentucky  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  from  1956 

111 


112 
to  1958  and  by  the  University  of  Florida  Agricultural  Experi- 
ment Station  from  1958  to  1960. 

He  is  a  member  of  Alpha  Zeta,  Gamma  Sigma  Delta,  Phi 
Kappa  Phi,  and  an  associate  member  of  the  Society  of  Sigma  Xi. 


This  dissertation  was  prepared  under  the  direction 
of  the  chairman  of  the  candidate* s  supervisory  committee 
and  has  heen  approved  "by  all  members  of  that  committee.   It 
was  submitted  to  the  Dean  of  the  College  of  Agriculture  and 
to  the  Graduate  Council,  and  was  approved  as  partial  ful- 
fillment of  the  requirements  for  the  degree  of  Doctor  of 
Philosophy. 

January,  1960 


7  iQ  /wx-vr^-t 


Dean,  College  of  Agriculture 


Dean,  Graduate  School 


SUPERVISORY  COMMITTEE: 


AGRI- 

CULTURAL 

LIBRARY 


UNIVERSITY  OF  FLORIDA 


3  1262  08553  7800