Skip to main content

Full text of "The Fern gazette"

See other formats


: THE FERN GAZETTE is a journal of the British Pteridological Society and 


F A TeDED 08 all aspects of pteridology. 


ee M eis may be abetted: and books etc. sent t for review, to: Prof. M. Gibby, 
— Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 SLR, UK 
poe oe 0131-248-2973 os E-mail: ‘FernGazette@eBPS. org.uk 


ae - aie ee ‘Seis are on page 244 of this volume and also available aie 
a: Bo cvidetiets ae 


Ce Sk ee eee ae ee oes ee ae ee vee — + 
bests I rved Aico oe 

j aterial tc ] opying or 

British 

5 = ANN 


Published ‘by THE BRITISH PTERIDOLOGICAL SOC IETY 
c/o Department of Botany, 
“The Natural History Museum, London SW7 S5BD, UK 


ee oe Printed by Bishops Printers Limited | 
es “Fitzherbert Road, Farlington, Portsmouth, FOS IRU, rt 
a gate caress co.uk 


Cover design by Hazel Sims 


181 FERN GAZ. 17(4). 2005 


British Pteridological Society 
with 

Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 
Linnean Society of London 


Ferns for the 21st Century 


Proceedings of the International Pteridophyte Symposium 
at the 
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Scotland, UK 
12-16 July 2004 
Part 2 


Editors: M. Gibby, A. Leonard, H. Schneider & J.C. Vogel 
MISSOURI BOTANICAL 


MAR 0 8 2006 
GARDEN LIBRARY 


ROY AL 
BOTANIC 
GARDEN 
EDINBURGH 


182 FERN GAZ. 17(4). 2005 


THE DELEGATES 


1)Marina Romanova 2) John Mickel 3) Eric Schuettpelz 4) Alan Smith 5) Judy 
Jernstedt 6) Marcus Lehnert 7) Klaus Mehltreter 8) Germinal Rouhan 9) Kunio 
Iwatsuki 10) Michael Kessler 11) Jens Pahnke 12) T. Boonkerd 13) Leon Perrie 14) 
Louis Chinnery 15) Stephen Blackmore 16) Niklas Wikstrom 17) Eka Iskandar 18) 
Jennifer Winther 19) Julie Barcelona 20) Barbara Parris 21) Paul Kenrick 22) Elena 
Estrelles 23) Michael Barker 24) Jonathan Krieger 25) Adrian Dyer 26) Ana Ibars 27) 
Peter Crane 28) Ruth Stockey 29) Elizbieta Zenkteler 30) Heather McHaffie 3 1) Gar 
Rothwell 32) Ruth Kirkpatrick 33) Joanne Sharpe 34) Peter Hovenkamp 35) Graham 
Ackers 36) Harald Schneider 37) Paulo Windisch 38) Daniel Ballesteros 39) Thomas 
Janssen 40) Carol Gibb 41) Alison Paul 42) Mary Gibby 43) Istvan Pintér 44) Irina 
Gureyeva 45) Tony Braithwaite 46) Royoko Imaichi 47) Mitsuyasu Hasebe 48) 
Johannes Vogel 49) Alasdair Wardlaw 50) Carl Taylor 51) Chris Page 52) Chie 
Tsutsumi 53) Frank Katzer 54) Wen-Liang Chiou 55) Patrick Acock 56) Yves Krippel 
57) Masahiro Kato 58) Gregor Kozlowski 59) Maarten Christenhusz 60) Kathleen 
Pryer 61) Sunniva Aagaard 62) Jurgen Kluge 63) Hanna Tuomisto 64) Harriet Hunt 65) 
Atsushi Ebihara 66) Fred Rumsey 67) Virag Krizsik 68) Luis Quintanilla 69) Ruth 
Aguraiuja 70) Kai Runk 71) Layne Huiet 72) Nathalie Nagalingum 73) Mirkka Jones 
74) Chan-Ho Park 75) Susan Klimas 76) Raymond Cranfill 77) Petra Korall 78) Tom 
Ranker 79) Sabine Hennequin 80) Michel Boudrie 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 183 


GRAMMITIDACEAE (PTERIDOPHYTA) OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW 
GUINEA AND OTHER MONTANE MALESIAN LOCALITIES 


B.S. PARRIS 


Fern Research Foundation, 21 James Kemp Place, Kerikeri, Bay of Islands, New 
Zealand 0470 (Email: bsparris@igrin.co.nz) 


Key words: Grammitidaceae, Pteridophyta, Mt Jaya, Mt Kinabalu, Seram, Gunung 
ulu, Malesia 


ABSTRACT 

Mount Jaya (5000 m) in Papua (Indonesian New Guinea) is the highest 
mountain in Malesia and 56 species of Grammitidaceae are known from it. They 
are listed, together with their altitude ranges, habitat types and geographic 
distribution. Comparisons are made with Grammitidaceae of Murkele Ridge in 
Seram, Moluccas, Indonesia (3000 m, 55 species), Mount Kinabalu in Sabah, 
East Malaysia, Borneo (4100 m, 76 species) and Gunung Mulu, Sarawak, East 
Malaysia, Borneo (2400 m, 43 species). A Malesia-wide core of 23 grammitid 
species is identified. 


INTRODUCTION 

The limestone massif of Mount Jaya (c. 5000 m) in Papua (Indonesian New Guinea) ts 
the highest peak in Southeast Asia. It is the only peak in the region high enough to 
support glaciers and has long been a magnet for biologists. Previous names for the 
mountain are Mount Carstensz and Punjak Sukarno. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 
has organised five botanical expeditions to the mountain during 1998 to 2000, during 
which many collections were made along an altitudinal transect on the southern side. A 
detailed description of the alpine flora of Mount Jaya (above 3000 m) is in preparation 
at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Johns et al. in prep.). While writing up the 
treatment of Grammitidaceae for this account, all relevant material collected on Mount 
Jaya was identified, not just that from high altitudes, and included specimens gathered 
by Kloss on the Wollaston expedition on the mountain during 1912-1913 and those 
collected by Miller in 1991 and 1992. Although nearly all of the available material has 
been collected from only the southern side of the mountain, it is of sufficient interest to 
document here in the following terms: |) how many species?. 2) what are they?, 3) what 
are their altitude ranges?, 4) what vegetation types are they found in?, 5) where else do 
they occur? 

Comprehensive collections of pteridophytes from specific localities are rare in 
Malesia, because many botanical collectors have specialised in gathering only 
flowering plants and have tended to overlook the smaller and more obscure species of 
pteridophytes, including most Grammitidaceae. There are only three other localities in 
Malesia where the fern flora, including Grammitidaceae, has been relatively 
well-collected over a wide altitudinal range: Mount Kinabalu Park in Sabah, East 
Malaysia, Borneo, Gunung Mulu National Park in Sarawak, East Malaysia and Murkele 
Ridge in Seram, Moluccas, Indonesia. More than 40 species are known trom each of 
these localities and they provide a useful comparison with Mount Jaya. The following 
questions are relevant: 1) how much do the floras of the three areas have in common 


184 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


€ 


with Mount Jaya?, 2) is there a distinct East Malesian element present on Mount Jaya 
and Murkele Ridge?, 3) is there a distinct West Malesian element on Mount Kinabalu 
and Gunung Mulu?, 4) is there a Malesia-wide group of species of predictable 
occurrence?, 5) do other pteridophytes show the same geographical distribution patterns 
and do they also have Malesia-wide species of predictable occurrence? 


Map | shows the location of Mount Jaya, Murkele Ridge, Mount Kinabalu and Gunung 
Mulu. 
Map 1. Malesia. 


Philippines 
ie 
PACIFIC OCEAN 

10°N 

Peni Mt Kinehety 

Malaysia 

‘ Gunung Mulu re : M 
O’N 
New Guinea 
Borneo Murkele Ridge ? 
Seram Mt Jaya 
Lesser Sunda Is. 
10°S 
100°E 110°E 120°E 130°E 140°C 150° 


Most species of Grammitidaceae are epiphytes on trunks and branches of a variety of 
trees and shrubs, or on the trunks of Cyathea in alpine communities, often associated 
with bryophytes, and a few species, particularly those of subalpine habitats, are 
lithophytes. 


Mount Jaya 
56 species of Grammitidaceae are known from Mount Jaya. They are listed, together 
with their altitude range, vegetation types and distribution, in Table 1. 

Tropical lowland rainforests are generally poor in members of Grammitidaceae, 
Which are far more numerous above the average daily lower limits of cloud. On Mount 
Jaya only five (9%) species occur in lowland rainforest, which contains the tree genera 
Chisocheton, Ficus, Mvristica, Octomeles, Pometia and Vatica, with undergrowth of 
ferns including tree ferns, Arthropteris and Marattia, and Gesneriaceae. All five species 
are also found in heath forest. Heath forest, the other lowland forest habitat on Mount 
Jaya, supports a surprisingly large number of species, 16 (29%). It occupies old 
Pleistocene outwash terraces at the foot of the mountain (R.J. Johns pers. comm.) and 
includes the trees Alstonia spectabilis R. Br. Calophyllum, Casuarina, Dacrydium, 
Metrosideros and Vatica, together with Nepenthes, Davallia, Lecanopteris, 
Hymenophyllaceae and Polypodiaceae. Two of the four Mount Jaya endemics, 
Ctenopteris hymenophylloides (also in lowland rainforest) and Grammitis velutina, 
occur here, together with two other species (Crenopteris nutans, Grammitis 
scabristipes) disjunct from much higher altitudes in midmontane forest, upper montane 


PARRIS: GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW GUINEA 


SIWApUd RAUIND MON 
DIWUAPUd BAUIND MON 
BIUOPa|B.) MON O} BALL 
BOUIND) MON) O} ISAMRING 
BOUIND) MON 0} BISARRIA “Ud 
BOUIND MON 0} BIVRUINS 
s1uapud BAEr JUNO 

SIWapUs BOUIND) MON 

BOUIND MON 0} BUTYSOPU] 

‘S] AJOID0G 0} BIPU] “Ss 
dIWapUa BOUIND MON 
njyenuevA 0} BISa|R ‘VISY 4S 
DIWUAPUS BOUIND) MIN 

ROUIND) MOK ‘sRdoNO|| 
DILUDPUd BOUINH) MAN, 

"S] UOLUOJOS 0} BISAR] RI, “Ud 
BOUIND) MON OF BRUINS 


DIWIApPUd BIUINDH MIN 


uoHNg!ysiG 


JW AWW 
VS 

AJWW 

4H 

VS AWW 4H 
AIWW 
ala 

VS 

JWW AWT 
a1 dH 

VS AWN 
AWN AWW 
VS 

AIWW 

VS 

VS ANW 
AWW AWT 
AW’ 


UO BIIBIA, 


W OO8T-OO8 I 
WOOTE 

W OYOPC-OOTC 
W Y09-00T 

W (O9C-O0S 
W 009T-O00C 
W QOS-O00T 
W OQOSE-OOEE 
W OOET-ONS | 
W QO8-00T 

W 009E-009T 
W QOLT-OOST 
W OO09E 

W O08 I 

W (YORE 

W 00St-00EC 
W QOET-OOTI 
Ww QOL! 


SPNNOTV 


‘yadoy (AyD) Uppoqyoie sHiuWRIH ‘g] 

‘jadoy (CMiapyy) euurdnepnqns "Dy “Z| 

‘jado,) (*|]JO7Z) BIDAaSSIPOpUNdasgns “+ ‘g| 

‘Paul SLIP RIBAS "D °¢ 

‘us f (QuIN|g) suRINU "+ “PT 

‘yado,y (dung) BlosaypIuU "DE | 

sued soproyAydouswiAy “) “Z| 

‘adoD eosnj “TI 

NIIPIVE WAY’ D (oumnyg) eyeypnonuap “yD ‘ol 
JOYIAIDH) 32 AUTEM HA (‘AdID) Saprlouysayq “Dd 
‘jado,y (Aayeq) epyneuuidig suajdouayy 
SIV (loyeg) BUBLARISSNW SUUeIdOSAIY) 


6 

8 

a 
‘jadoy saylurel “9 
‘jadoy sapoiuw ay *¢ 
v 


Jado) sysey *D 


[Salg’d (AwNn]g 2 SaaN) smiey[NoN "Dy *¢ 
MOO | (YOOH) JayIAvjO uopowuuAyeD 7 
ISLYD'H GSUYyO'H) Waiyoayyos sniosoiy "| 
saad 


‘eAer JUNO JO IVIOEPHIWIWUPID "| Iquy 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


186 


"s] sesanbie|y] 0} eIpuy S 
dIWApUd ROUIND MAN 
BOUIND) MON 0} OdUIOG 
stuapus vARP JUNO 
BOUIND MOXY O} BIVBUING 
njenuevA 0} BQeUINS 

‘S] UOLIO]OS 0} sedONTOYW 
o1wapua eAer JUNO 
BOUIND MON 0} BIVRUWING 
BOUINDH MOXY O} RAVENS 
SIWWOPUD BOUIND MON 
SIWIAPUd BOUIND MAN 
BOUINH) MANY O} BRUINS 
fly 0} BISAR]eYy Ae;NsUIUdg 
BOUIND) MON 01 BISY FS 
SIWApUd BOUIN MIN 
dIWApUS BOUIND) MON 
DIWOPUd BOUND MON 
BOUIND MAN 0} OAUIOg 
SIWUApUd BOUIN MAN 
SIWUIapUd BARS UNO 


d1WdpUd RaUINDH MAN 


VS AWW 4H 
dH 

dWW AW 
VS AWN JINN 
AWW 

VS 

dINW AW AH 
VS 

dNW AWT 
VS AWW 
dWN 

AWW 

VS INW 

a1 4H 

VS 

AWW 

VS 


W OQOET-O08 | 
W OOPE-OO0T 
W QOT 

W OOb-O00C 
W 0QO9CT-O0LI 
W OO8E-O0F 
sec 
WOOET-OO8 
W 006E-009T 
W O06! 

W OQ06E 

W OQOST-O0S 
W OQO8E-OOSE 
W OQOET-OO8 
W OOS E-008 | 
W QO9T 

W YOST 

W OOTH-O0ET 
WW Q09-00S 

W O09E 

W OOPC 
WOOSE 


[S%dg*D (1S1O4H) ensyuod ‘g * 
SLUB_ (“JSUISOY) BIL][LALUNDIIO ‘g ° 
SLUeg (Joyeg) 1aspiqing endesodg ° 
SLUeg PUINIOA 


‘jadoD (sayeg) euRsyeWNs 


‘Jado (isussoy) seprowuessoinayd 


ms 
yy 
‘[adoy (4ayeg) sadusiuqeros ‘+ ° 
% 
a 


sled (Map y) sisuanded 


‘Jado. (4ayeg) sisuasueped ‘fH - 


‘Jadoy (‘ISUdsOY) BUIISSHBUIO ‘T° 
5D 


‘Jado usddip-safiaur * 


‘jedoy (Map y) BsopNdo] ‘DH * 
‘jado,y (4ayRg) eIL]JAd0] °D ° 
‘JadoD (4ayeg) eurIpsoysinuy ‘DH ° 
SIURq (SLY) eBSsiwuonUT tr ° 
‘Jadoy (ayeg) eidnuaqut ‘pH - 
‘Jedo.D epidsty + ° 


‘Jedod CIP) eprsuy +H 
‘[ado,y (Jado) erOsoYsOp ‘H 
‘JedoD vryoytigap "Dp 


SLUR BIRARID DH 


‘jado,y edurs0je199 FH ° 


OF 
6t 


187 


nA 


A, NEW GUIN 


, 
4 


PARRIS: GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JA) 


‘pasuvs) Supe ulvsd) JO aunqyeu snoyidioaid JO asnevsaq sysiuKjOg MAY AQ Pd}da] [09 JOU LE QOS E-OOXT Wues apne ION 


‘(W QOTP-OOEE) SOUIUNWIOD dUIdjeqns “WS “(LU QOLT-QO9Z) ISMO} SuRJUOLE Jaddn “4PYA “(LUIQORZ-OO8 1) 
JSOIOJ] QURJUOWIPIL “IV “(WU QOL | -OOR) ISAOJ DULJUOL JAMO] “YIV] “(LU QOS-OOT) ISAOJUIeL PUR] MO] “477 “(LU YO9-QOT) ISO} YIBIY “4H 


BOUIND) MON O} BISARTRIY “Ud 
BOUINE) MAN O} BISARTRIY “Udd 
SIWIApUd ROUIND MON 

BOUIND) MAN, O} RISAR]RI, “Ud 
‘S] UOLUOJOS 07 sauIddiyiyg 
SIWApUd ROUIND MON 

BOUIND) MON O} RAVENS 
SIWAPUd BIUIND MAN 
sesanbiey 0} ByuRy] US 

"S| UOWIOJOS OF puRyIeYL 

‘S] UOLUOJOS “BaUIND MAN 
BOUIND MON O} BARS 

DIWApUd BAUINH MIN 
DIWApPUd BOUND) MON 

BOUIND) MON OF BIPUT S 


BOUIND) MON O} BISARTRI] “Ud 


W 009E-008 | 


WQQ9-O0S 


W QO9T-OOFT 


W (09-00S 


W YOPC-O0TI 


W (QO9IT 


WOOT 


W OOPE-OOET 


Wi QO9 

W (09 

W O0OLC 

W OOPC 

W OOS I 

W 008 

W OOS 

W QOLE-O0FE 


‘yado,y (Quinjg) epyneuurdgns “xX “9¢ 

Sled (MIOP]Y) Brayl[MIas “KX “SS 

sued (MIaply) stpeaidsopnasd -yx “ps 

ado.) (asneig) sisuaevofpiaos suaidoydiyx “¢¢ 
stued (‘Jado.)) Wapod “| “7S 

sled (jado.) wintpoyluruess “y 1S 

sled (Suinjg) winqelosey “pL “OS 

SLUR (MIOP]Y) WNOSO]]|R WNTPAWdY_ | “6P 
“MIOPLY (UyNy) WNyRoINs *S “Rp 

“MIOP]Y (Quinyg) wunyisnd *S “Lp 

‘jado,y wintoplounf winssojso1a]9g “Op 
IUD W (azuNy xd aun] g) BSO]NUDA ‘gq “Sp 
SLued (Pry) stisuad “qd “pp 

‘paul siueg eieyjided -g ‘¢p 

WOW (owinyg) eienbijgo ‘gq ‘7p 

Jodo) (oye FY TENA) Paoery|eaep ‘d “1p 


188 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


forest and subalpine communities. Crenopteris serrata, Grammitis pleurogrammoides, 
Prosaptia burbidgei, Scleroglossum pusillum, S. sulcatum and oa ies en setulifera 
are known only from heath forest on Mount Jaya, but occur in other communities 
elsewhere in New Guinea and further afield in Malesia. The aie: may exist 
elsewhere in New Guinea, but apparently no members of Grammitidaceae have been 
collected from it. Heath forest, also called kerangas, is known from Peninsular 
Malaysia, Borneo, and elsewhere in Malesia. It develops at low altitudes on very poor 
or thin soils over rock or in areas of impeded drainage and is characterised by straight, 
pole-like small to medium sized trees and an understorey including pitcher plants 
(Nepenthes). Usually it contains very few, if any, species of Grammitidaceae. 

Apart from heath forest, the most species-rich habitats on Mount Jaya are 
midmontane forest (28, 50%), and subalpine communities, with 19 species (21%). 
Lower montane and upper montane forests are less rich, each with 9 species (16%). 
Lower montane forest contains the fern Se//iguea (no other information concerning the 
vegetation of lower montane forest is available on the specimen labels). The 
midmontane forest is dominated by Nothofagus; Casuarina, Dacrydium, Fagraea, 
Loranthaceae, Macaranga, Papuacedrus, Rhododendron and Timonius are also present 
together with the sedge Mapania, the ferns Asplenium, Belvisia, Cyathea, 
Elaphoglossum and Loxogramme, and shrubby Urticaceae. Grammitis clavata is the 
only Mount Jaya endemic in midmontane forest. Only eight species are restricted to 
midmontane forest, with another eight extending downward to lower montane forest 
and sometimes further, to heath forest and lowland rainforest, and 13 extending 
upwards to upper montane forest and sometimes to the subalpine communities. Upper 
montane forest is dominated by Papuacedrus papuana (F. Muell.) Li and Podocarpus 
brassii Pilg., with Dicksonia, Drimys, Elaeocarpus, Nepenthes, Rapanea, 
Rhododendron, Sloanea and Utricularia. Grammitis interrupta, Scleroglossum 
Juncifolium and Themelium graminifolium are restricted to upper montane forest on 
Mount Jaya, but occur in other vegetation types elsewhere. Another five species occur 
in midmontane forest as well as upper montane forest, and two, Crenopteris 
bipinnatifida and Grammitis padangensis, extend to the subalpine zone. The subalpine 
grasslands are dominated by Cyathea tree ferns, while the subalpine shrubland contains 
Cyathea, Coprosma, Drimys, Rhododendron and Vaccinium, and the subalpine forest 
contains Dacrycarpus compactus (Wassch.) de Laub. and Podocar- pus. Nine species are 
restricted to subalpine habitats: Calymmodon fragilis, C. ramifer, Ctenopteris fusca, C. 
subulatipinna, Grammitis ceratocarpa, G. debilifolia, G. locellata, G. meijer-dreesii and 
Prosaptia davalliacea. With the exception of G Jocellata and P. davalliacea, all are 
New Guinea endemics. While the nine species all occur on Mount Jaya at altitudes 
higher than that of the nearest subalpine site to New Guinea, Murkele Ridge (3000 m) 
in Seram, the two species that are widespread through Malesia, G /ocellata and P. 
davalliacea, occur at lower altitudes on Murkele Ridge. 

Several species found on Mount Jaya are infrequently collected and are known from 
very few localities. They include medium to high altitude Papua endemics known 
elsewhere only from Lake Habbema - Grammitis hispida, Themelium allocotum, Mount 
Trikora - Ctenopteris fusca, G. meijer-dreesii, and/or Mount Doorman, C. 
subulatipinna, T. allocotum, and Mount Goliath and Hellwig Mounts - Xiphopteris 
pseudospiralis. Xiphopteris govidjoaensis (syn. X. exilis Parris) is known from two 
na localities, Gunung Belumut in Peninsular Malaysia and Govidjoa in Papua New 

uinea. 


PARRIS: GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW GUINEA 189 


Four species (7%) are endemic to Mount Jaya; Crenopteris hymenophylloides, 
Grammitis clavata, G. papuensis and G. velutina. Surprisingly, none occurs in the 
subalpine communities, as might be expected when considering that several other 
mountains in New Guinea have high altitude endemics, e. g. Grammitis dictvmioides 
Copel, G habbemensis Copel., Xiphopteris antipodalis Copel. (all Lake Habbema), G. 
reptans Parris (Mount Trikora), G montana Parris, G. trogophylla Copel. (both Mount 
Sarawaket), G murrayana (C.Chr.) Copel. (Wharton Range) and G. salticola Parris 
(Mount Giluwe) (Parris, 1983). 

A number of other high altitude New Guinea species found on Mount Trikora and/or 
Lake Habbema, and elsewhere in Papua New Guinea, may be expected on Mount Jaya, 
including Ctenopteris pendens (Rosenst.) Copel., C. whartoniana (C.Chr.) Copel. and 
Grammitis tomaculosa Parris. 

New Guinea endemic species are important on Mount Jaya, comprising 36% (20 
species) of the total. While they occur in all of the vegetation types they are best 
represented in the high altitude subalpine communities, where they form 20% (11 
species) of the total number of species. The largest number of species, 24 (43%) are 
Malesia-wide in the sense that they occur in both West Malesia and East Malesia, on 
both sides of Zollinger’s line (see later) between Borneo and Sulawesi, sometimes 
extending into Thailand, Indochina and Taiwan to the north-west and into Melanesia 
(Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, New Caledonia and Fiji) to the south-east. A small group 
of species (4, 7%) is very wide-ranging, from South India to the Society Islands 
(Ctenopteris blechnoides), South India to the Marquesas Islands (Prosaptia contigua), 
Sri Lanka to the Marquesas Islands (Sc/eroglossum sulcatum) and from South India to 
New Guinea (P. obliquata). These four species are amongst the most common and 
widespread members of Grammitidaceae in the Asia-Malesia-Pacific region. Another 
four (7%) species are restricted to East Malesia; Crenopteris serrata ranges from 
Sulawesi to New Guinea, Calymmodon mniodes is in the Moluccas and New Guinea, 
Grammitis pleurogrammoides extends from the Moluccas to the Solomon Islands and 
Scleroglossum juncifolium occurs in New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. 

The grammitid flora of Mount Jaya inevitably invites comparison with that of 
Mount Kinabalu (4100 m) in Sabah, Borneo, East Malaysia, the highest peak between 
the Himalayas and Papua, and the two other areas sufficiently well-known to permit 
comparison of their grammitid floras: the Murkele Ridge, a limestone massif including 
Gunung Binaiya (3000 m) in Seram, Moluccas, Indonesia, and Gunung Mulu National 
Park (including Gunung Mulu, sandstone, 2400 m and Gunung Api, limestone, 1700 m) 
in Sarawak, Borneo, East Malaysia. It is useful to examine the composition of these 
montane grammitid floras with respect to Zollinger’s line, which divides West Malesia, 
comprising Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra, Java, Borneo, the Philippines and the Lesser 
Sunda Islands, from East Malesia, consisting of Sulawesi, the Moluccas and New 
Guinea, and separated by the Makassar Strait between Borneo and Sulawesi. Wallace’s 
line is similar, but includes Bali, the westernmost of the Lesser Sunda Islands, in West 
Malesia, and the remaining Lesser Sunda Islands in East Malesia. As the Lesser Sunda 
Islands are considered a discrete botanical region, Zollinger’s line is preferred to 
Wallace’s line. Mount Kinabalu and Gunung Mulu National Park (subsequently 
referred to as Gunung Mulu) are in West Malesia, while Murkele Ridge and Mount Jaya 
are in East Malesia. Both Mount Kinabalu and Murkele Ridge have subalpine areas 
above the treeline, but Gunung Mulu is forested to its summit. 

The Moluccas have been of biogeographical interest ever since Wallace (1869) 


190 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


suggested that the region has been constantly receiving immigrants from New Guinea. 
Kato (1989a) also points out that the affinity of the fern flora of Seram at species level 
is with New Guinea to the east rather than with Sulawesi to the west. Parris (1993) notes 
that the endemic pteridophytes of Seram are derived on the whole from wide-ranging 
taxa or those from East Malesia, and that Seram is the end of the line for numerous 
species moving east from West Malesia and moving west from New Guinea. 
Grammitidaceae of Seram collected by the Japanese-Indonesian expeditions of 1983, 
1985 and 1986 (but not those collected by Parris in 1987) have been listed (Kato & 
Parris, 1992), the pteridophyte flora of Mount Kinabalu has been documented (Parris ef 
al., 1992), and a checklist of pteridophytes of Gunung Mulu National Park has been 
compiled (Parris, unpublished). Numerous changes have been made to the taxonomy of 
Grammitidaceae in Seram and on Mount Kinabalu since the publications of Kato & 
Parris (1992) and Parris et al. (1992). 


Murkele Ridge 
55 species of Grammitidaceae are known from Murkele Ridge. They are listed, together 
with their altitude range, vegetation types and distribution, in Table 2. 

It is useful to compare the grammitid floras of Mount Jaya and Murkele Ridge, the 
two East Malesian localities, which have very similar numbers of species, 56 in the 
former and 55 in the latter. 25 species are shared between the two, and nine of these are 
restricted to East Malesia. The remaining 16 are more widespread, occurring in East and 
West Malesia and sometimes beyond. Only Ctenopteris serrata extends throughout 
East Malesia from Sulawesi to New Guinea, so a well-defined widespread East 
Malesian endemic element is lacking in Grammitidaceae. Only one species, Acrosorus 
Jriderici-et-pauli, reaches its eastern limit of distribution on Murkele Ridge in Seram, 
but eight others, Calymmodon mniodes, Ctenopteris whartoniana, Grammitis 
ahenobarba, G. collina, G. parva, G. pseudolocellata, G. subfasciata and Prosaptia 
engleriana, reach their western limit in Seram, either on Murkele Ridge or slightly 
further to the north-west on Gunung Kobipoto (G. collina) or Gunung Roihelu (G 
parva). They amply demonstrate Wallace’s point (1869) that the Moluccas receive 
immigrants from New Guinea. In addition, some of the Murkele Ridge endemic species 
have obvious vicariants in New Guinea, e. g. Ctenopteris themelioides with C. 
bipinnatifida, and Themelium pseudallocotum with T. allocotum. The similarity in 
species numbers between Mount Jaya and the much lower Murkele Ridge is surprising, 
and the reasons for it are not obvious. 

Comparisons between Murkele Ridge and the two West Malesian localities, Mount 
Kinabalu and Gunung Mulu, are interesting. 33 species are shared with Mount 
Kinabalu, more than are shared with Mount Jaya. They include seven widespread 
species collected on Gunung Mulu and known from New Guinea that are absent from 
Mount Jaya: Calymmodon gracilis, C. pectinatus, C. reconditus, C tenopteris 
brevivenosa, Grammitis adspersa, G. impressa, G. reinwardtii. All are expected on 
Mount Jaya. 19 species are shared with Gunung Mulu and, with the exception of 
Calymmodon conduplicatus, all are also known from Mount Kinabalu. 

31 species (56%) on Murkele Ridge are found in both East and West Malesia and 
another 5 (9%) extend well beyond Malesia, while 9 species (16%) occur in East 
Malesia and another 9 (16%) are endemic to Murkele Ridge. The amount of local 
endemism is much higher than on Mount Jaya, which has only four endemics. One 
might expect local endemism at high altitudes on Murkele Ridge, the highest part of the 


19] 


PARRIS: GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW GUINEA 


BOUIND) MIN O} ISAMP[NS 
DWAPUd ISPly IOxINJA| 
BOUIND) MOK O} BISARIRIAY “Ud 
BOUIND MON O} BRUINS 
BOUIND MAN, O} BULYDOPU| 
njenued 0} purypliey 

“S] AJOIDOG 0} BIPUT 

njyenurA 0} BIsayey “VISY JS 
BOUIND MIN 0} OOUIOg 
BOUIND) MON O} BALL 

BOUINL) MON “SBdONO|| 
BOUIND MON O} RISYV AS 

"S| UOWO]OS 0} BISARTRI “Ud 
BOUND) MAN 0} OdUIOG 
BOUIND MAN O} BVBWINS 
dWAapuUds dIspry sayin 
dIWapuds dIspry aon 


seoonjoyy 0} BISY 4S 


uOHNgLySIC 


AW 

AW 
AWN 
‘SAWT AT 
dW) 
AWN 
AW] 

AW 

AW 

VS JINN AW 
AWA AW 
AW 

VS 

AW 

JWT 


U0IRIIGIA 


We QOOT-009 
WwW OQO9T 

W 006C-008 I 
W YOO0T-O08 | 
WOOT! 

W OOPC 

W OOET-OOS 
W QOOT-O00TI 
W (YOST 
WQO81-0091 
W O08 1 

W 0081 

W QO8C-008 1 
W QOSC-O0CI 
W QOOC-OOLI 
W OQO8T 
WOOL 

W QOOT-O0ET 


apmynty 


‘Poul SLUR IBIS */) S| 

"POUL SLLIBY SISUDWURIAS *) “L | 

"US f (QUIN; g) suBINU *) “QT 

‘jadoy (auinyg) eyosaqpu "DS | 

NdIpPIeL WAY D (oun | 
UNVJOH CMIOply) BSOUDSATAAIG “DE ] 


— 


Bye|NOQUap "DO ‘pI 


JoyIasH 2 AUseA\’ HM (AIID) Saplouysayq sluaidoualD ‘Z| 
SLUR (IDV) BPURIARIDSNU SILULURIBOSAIY) *| | 

‘paul sued SNIpUuodal “Dd ‘0 

‘pour sued snyeunsad *y 

‘jado.y sapotuuwt “> 

‘JadoD (a94) stplovss * > 

[SXq’) (OuIN|g WZ SdaN) sniBT[NINd * +) 

‘jadod (asneig) snyeotjdnpuos *) 

DOO [| (YOO) JOJIAB]S “+ 

‘pour sLueg sisuddreulg UOpoUWAye) 


aa tu 6K wo oO 


‘Poul SLUR SNIRI[PA “VY 


‘yadod (syd H) yned-ja-19apLy snsoso1ay 


_ 


saiadg 


‘ISpPly apayn JO avaowpniwweIyH “7 9qUL 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


192 


BOUIND MON O} BQBUINS 
BOUIND) MAN “SBOON[O|y 
njenue, Oo} BQeUINS 

‘S] UOWIOJOS 0} BYU] LIS 
BOUIND) MAN “SsBdoNjO|W 
BOUIND) MON ‘sedoNjop] 
BOUIND MON O} BAVRUINS 
SRIIN|O|] 0} OAUIOG 
d1WapUd dSpry spayany 
BOUINDH MAN OF BVBUINS 
if1.J 0} BISARTRIY Ae[NSUIUDY 
dIWapUd dSpry sjayINy 
BOUIND) MON 0} UBMIB] 
BOUIND MANY O} BRUINS 
BOUIND) MON O} ODIO 
BOUIND MAN ‘sBdoN[O| 
BOUIND MON O} BIZRUINS 
BOUIND MON ‘seoonjoyy 
fly 01 BIS JS 

BOUIND) MON ‘sKdoNjoYy 
dIWapud sspry sjayIN YY 
BIUOPs[BD MAN O1 BALLS 


dW) 

AW 

VS JWA 
AW 

VS 

VS AWN AWT 
AW 


VS 


VS ANN AW 


AW 


WQ00C-00E I 
W 0061-00F1 
W 006C-00CT 
W QOOC-O0L 
W006C 

W Q06C-008 I 
tu QOOC-O08 | 
WOOL! 
W009 
W (06T-008T 
W Q00C 
WW 09 

Ww 000C-009 | 
WwW oo0e! 

WU (OOT-008 
W OOF! 

W OOTC 

WwW O09 

Ww 009] 

W 0067 

UW QO8T-O00T 
Ww O0E! 


‘jedoD (4ayeg) BUREUINS DH “Op 

* ado (suasoy) eIVIOSRIQNS TD “GE 
‘yadoy (4ayeg) sadnsuqess ‘ry “g¢ 
aun] MpaweMuUlal FH “LE ¢ 

SLUR BIL]]AOJOpNasd ‘FH ‘g¢ 
‘jadoD (asneig) eared tp “¢¢ 
‘Jado. (4ayeg) sisuasdueped "Fp “pe 
‘Paul sLUeY STOW "DH “EE 

‘poul SLY SIsuajasnueul DH “7E 
‘jado,y (Aayeg) BIE]]A00] T “TE 
‘Jado (4ayeg) vuvipsoysinuy D “o¢ 
‘POUl SLLIBG SISUBYOYIULY 1) “67 
SLUR (ISUYD'H) BSSIWONUI TD “gz 
‘jado.y essaidun 1 “47 

‘Jado (‘jado,)) vsosoysijop "DH ‘gz 
SLUR BULL[OS ‘Ty ‘SZ 

auinyg vsoudsaes ty “pz 

SLUR BqIeqoudye T “FZ 

auwinyg (owinyg) esusdspe sniutuPIin *7z 
‘Jado, (4YyD*D) BuriuoEYM * “1 Zz 
‘Poul SLUBY SAPlOlaWay) “J ‘QZ 


‘}adod (]]07Z) vdasstIpopunsasqns ‘61 


193 


PARRIS: GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW GUINEA 


‘(WE QOOE-O0PT) SAH 


-luNLUWOD auIdyeqgns “WS “(W QOSZ-001Z) Ise} ouRJUOW Jaddn “yi “(LU QOL Z-O09) ISAL0J DUBIUOW JAMO] “AIT “(LU QOY) ISesOJ puR[MO] “47] 


BOUIND MON O} BISARTRI “Ud 
BOUIND) MON O} BISARIRI] “Udd 
‘S] UOWO]OS 0} sourddiyiyd 
BOUIND MON 0} OOUIOG 
dWIapUda dBpry san] 
sesanbiey 0} ByURT] LIS 

“S| UOLUOJOS 0} pueypeyL 
BOUIND MON O} BALL 

dIWIApUd sBdON]O|| 

d1WdpUd ddply sa4ANJA| 
BOUIND MON O} BIPU] S 
BOUIND MAN ‘SBdoN|O/ 
BOUIND MON 0} BISARTRIY “Ud 
"s] sesonbieyy 0} eIpUuy S 


otwapud aspry spoyINy| 


dW 
AW 
AW 
dW 
dW 
AW 
AW) 


AW] 
AW 


W008 I 

W 0001-006 
WwW YOOT-008 I 
W (OCC 

We OOE| 

WwW OOET-0001 
WwW QO 1-O001 
W OOTZ 

WwW Q091-00E1 
W 0Q00C-008 | 
W Q00C-009 
W 008-009 

W 0Q06C-O08C 
W QO00C-00L 
WO00EI 


‘jadoy (aun) epyyneuurdgns "x “¢¢ 

Sued CAOpPlY) elayipnias suaydoydry “ps 
sled (Jadod) MApoAd “| ES 

SIIB (DAVE) SOPIOIPOXR] “| ZS 

‘pour siueg WNnjosojjepnasd wintyawayy |S 
“MIOPTY (UyNy) WUNRO[NS “S "OS 

“MIOppy (aunyg) tunypisnd winssojSo19[9g “Gp 
IUD’ W (azuny xo awn] g) BSO[NUDIA ‘g ‘Rp 
sluvg (sLuRg 2 OY) BIqe{sqns ‘gq “Lp 
‘POU SILUIBY SISUSWIRIAS ‘gf ‘OP 

NOW (ounpg) eienbijgo “g “Sp 

‘jadoy (asneig) euBLio|sud ‘g “pr 

‘Jodo (oyeg 7 ‘[ONW4) B9ORTT[BARP ‘g “EP 
|SUq*D (1810,,'H) ensyuos endesolg ‘Zp 
SLU, ZW OY" sisuans0ya 1 ‘|p 


194 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


Moluccas and the only part of the region to be above the tree line, but only Calymmodon 
binaiyensis is restricted to subalpine habitats. Crenopteris themelioides ranges from 
lower montane forest to subalpine habitats while the other local endemics are all found 
in lower montane forest. Only one species, Prosaptia subglabra, is endemic to the 
Moluccas. 


Mount Kinabalu 

76 species of Grammitidaceae are known from Mount Kinabalu. They are listed, 
together with their altitude range, vegetation types and distribution, in Table 3. 

Mount Kinabalu and Mount Jaya make an interesting contrast. The former has far more 
species of Grammitidaceae, 76, than the latter, with 56. Mount Kinabalu has a long 
history of botanical collecting, however, over more than a century, which may explain 
its species richness in part (Parris ef al., 1992). It should be noted, however, that nine 
species have not been collected on the mountain in the last 60 years (Parris, 2001) and 
may well be locally extinct. 23 species occur on both mountains; all of them, except 
Themelium fasciatum, are also found on Murkele Ridge, and 10 of them are also found 
on Gunung Mulu. Mount Kinabalu has nine endemic species of Grammitidaceae (16%), 
more than double the number found on Mount Jaya. As with Murkele Ridge, one might 
expect the endemic species to be associated with the high altitude vegetation 
communities above the tree line, but only Grammitis kinabaluensis extends above the 
tree line, and it also occurs in lower montane and mid-montane forest. Grammitis 
graniticola, G. muscicola and G nubicola are restricted to upper montane forest, while 
Calymmodon innominatus and Grammitis ramicola are found only in lower montane 
forest and Calymmodon kinabaluensis, Grammitis havilandii and G. ultramaficola 
occur in both lower montane and upper montane forest. 44 species (58%) are 
Malesian-wide, a higher number and percentage than for either Mount Jaya or Murkele 
Ridge. Another eight species (11%) extend well beyond Malesia. 10 species are 
restricted to West Malesia, six of which are also found on Gunung Mulu. The West 
Malesian Crenopteris fuscata occurs at high altitudes on Mount Kinabalu (3000-3800 
m) and is not found on Gunung Mulu (2400 m), but Grammitis congener (1100-2500 
m) and Themelium curtisii (1400-2400 m) are absent from Gunung Mulu, but may be 
expected. Xiphopteris nudicarpa occurs on ultramafic rocks on Mount Kinabalu and on 
Palawan Island in the Philippines. Ultramafic rocks, and_X nudicarpa, are absent from 
Gunung Mulu. Five species are endemic to Borneo and all are shared with Gunung 
Mulu. 


Gunung Mulu 
43 species of Grammitidaceae are known from Gunung Mulu. They are listed, together 
with their altitude range, vegetation types and distribution, in Table 4. 

Gunung Mulu is lower than Mount Jaya, Murkele Ridge and Mount Kinabalu, and 
lacks vegetation communities above the tree line. It has no endemic species, and 36 of 
its 43 species are also found on Mount Kinabalu, 22 species (51%) are Malesian-wide 
and five (12%) range well beyond Malesia. The nine West Malesian species (21%) all 
occur on Mount Kinabalu. Seven species are endemic to Borneo: five also occur on 
Mount Kinabalu, but Scleroglossum crassifolium and Themelium sarawakense are not 
known there. 

In Table 5 the geographic distribution of Grammitidaceae on Mount Jaya, Murkele 
Ridge, Mount Kinabalu and Gunung Mulu is summarised. 


199 


GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW GUINEA 


PARRIS 


BOUIND) MON 0} BISARTRIY “Ud 
BOUIND MON 0} BISY FS 
soulddiyiyg 0} eiskeyeyy ‘Udd 
ROUIND MAN O} B.BUINS 
soulddiyjiyg 0} Biskeyeyy ‘udd 
sourddiyiyg 0} purprey,| 
BOUIND MON 0} BUIYyDOpUT 
nyenue, 0} puryieyy, 

“s] AJOI90g 0} BIPUT “Ss 
nyenurd 0} BISy 4S 
sourddipiyg 0) eyurT] Ls 
BOUINL) MANY 0} OSUIOG 
ROUIND) MON 0} BARS 
soulddiiyg 0} eave 

"S] UOLUOTOS 0} BISY 4S 
o1luapus nyjeqeury JUNO 
dUdpUs Njeqeury JUNO 
BOUIND) MAN O} BALL 

BOUIND) MAN O} BISY FS 

"S] UOWO]OS 0} BISARRIY ‘Ud 
BOUIND MAN O} BBUINS 
dIWINpUsa OAUIOg 

BOUIND MON 0} OOWIOgG 
soutddiyiyg 0} pueyrey.| 
SRdONJO|| 0} BISY FS 


woHnqLysig 


Uu0ne}I99A4 


WU OOS E-O09T 
W ()06C-00S | 
WwW OOF] 

W 0081 
WOOL 

W OO8E-O00E 
W 0O08T-00TI 
W Q00E-00F | 
W 0001-008 
WwW OOTC-O0FI 
Ww OOS 
WOOT €-008 | 
W QOST-00S I 
W OOS | 

W OOPC-O0S I 
W OO8C-O0S | 
W OOP 

W 001C-00FI 
W OOOE-00TI 
W QO00E-00TT 
W 009C-00S | 
WwW 000-008 I 
W OOFE-008 I 
W 0061-008 
W 0061-001 


apnynty 


“WS 'f (QuIN}g) suBINU ) “SZ 
AZUNY (AWIN|g A SAIN) BWIOTIJOUL "-y “PTZ 
wiINyjOH (awinyg) enue > ° 

‘yadoy (auinyjg) eloyaypru “> 

‘jado,y (duinjg) ensidsuosut °° 

azuny (auin|g) BIBdIsNy ° ‘OZ 

naipsep Wu’ D (auinjg) erepnonuap *>y 6] 
wINOH] (Maply) BSOUDATADIG "5 ‘81 

JOYINID w 1dUseAA HA ('AdID) saprouysayg siuaidouany */ | 
sued (Jayeg) eueiaridsnu “> “9| 

sued ((Wg'f) esojnpurys sntuuUeIBOsAIY) “S| 
‘poul sLueg snyipuodsal “> “P| 

‘paul stueg smeunoad 9 “¢] 

‘jadoy (Jado) sapioosnu “5 “Z| 

‘jado,y (ultu0g) snuelUassiany “> “|| 

‘Poul Sie” Sisuon[eqeuly *) ‘Ol 

‘poul sLueg smeuluouul y “6 

‘jadon snaidossoisAy 8 

‘Jado> (994) sifowid yy *L 

[SUd'D (Aunjg 2 SdenN) smepnond yg 
AOOW'L (CYOOH) JAPAR]I“ *¢ 

‘poul sue sIsuddu0g "Dy “p 

‘jadoy snyosuye uopowmmAjey “¢ 

‘jadoy (aayeg) snyAydoidans “y °*z 

‘Jadog (suyD'H) yned-ja-19Uapuy snruosoloy ‘| 


-—- ANS 


oral 


sapods 
“nyeqeury juno) Jo avacepHiUUeID “¢ afquy 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


196 


dIlUAapUd OdUOg 

‘S| UOWOJOS 0} ByURT LIS 
dlWdpud Nyeqeury JUNO 
soutddiiyg 0) enewng 
BOUIND MAN 0} BIeUINS 
‘S] UOLUOJOS 0} BsyRUINS 
dWdpUd Njeqeury JUNO 
dIWIapUd Nyeqeury iUNO| 
SROON|O|Y 0} OOWIOG 
ROUIND MON 0} BRUINS 
ify 01 eIsAeyeyy sepnsurusg 
dIWAapUs Njeqeuly JUNOPy 
‘S] UOWO[OS 0} BISY 4S 
BOUIND MON O} URATE], 
BOUIND) MAN 0} B.YBUUINS 
ISIMEING O} BISARTRIA| "Ud 
d1WapUd Nyeqeury JUNO 
dWapus Njeqeury JUNO] 
ISAMBINS ‘OOUIOg 

BOUIND MANY 0} OAUIOg 
sourddiiyd 01 vIsy 4S 
ROUIND MON 01 OOWIOg 
ROUINDH MON 0} BRUINS 
d1uIapus OsUI0g 

ify 01 BISy AS 

BIUOpa[eD MON 0} BARS 
OaWOg 0} BAyEUINS 

‘S| UOWO]OS 0} BYU] US 


AW 

vs AWN 
AWN AW 
VS AWN AW 
JW dW 
dW 

AW 

AWA AW 
dW AW 
JW 
AWN AWT 
AWN AWT 
AW'T 

Vs AWN 


W OOET-OOTI 
W OQO81-00T1 
W 0097-005 | 
WwW YOST-0091 

W OObE 

W007! 
W 00TE-O00E 

W OOPE 
W OOS 1-00t1 
W OOLE-00TE 
W QOLT-00S | 
UW QOOb-008 I 
W QOQIC-OOFI 
W OOPC-00F I 

WwW O0TI 
W 0067-0021 
W OOTE-O0S I 
W OOPE-OOEE 
W (Q0L7-0007 
W OOOE-O0TT 
W OOSC-OOTI 


WW 0O81-00S I 
Ww OOS I 
 QOPT-O0LI 
 QO0C-00F I 
UW QOLT 


‘jadod saplonpieMulal ty “¢¢ 

SUN] | HIPIBMUTDI DT) *7C 

‘Poul SLUBY BjOOTWIBI ‘FH “1 ¢ 

aunt g eBjnosnisoyid ‘fH *Q¢ 

‘jadoy (s9yRq) stsuasueped ‘F “Gp 
‘jadoy (s94eg) BIL[ODOULIGO "DH ‘gp 

‘pout sled Bjoorqnu DH “Lp 

‘pour SLUeg BJOSIOSNU ‘DH ‘Op 

“POUT SIUB_ SI[JOU fT) “Sp 

‘Jodo (4axeg) BIEI[P00] ‘+H “pp 

‘jadoy (4oyeg) vuLIpsoysinUy "DH “Ep 
‘Jedo9 (edo) sisuonjeqeury 'D “Zp 
BME] (UYNY Xd “WoOY)) PUBLIOTEL ty “|p 
SLU (SY D"H) BSSIWONUI T “Op 
‘jadoz essoidut tp ‘6¢ 

‘Jado tuinyjoy '*D “g¢ 

‘jodog (sayeq) HpuryiAey 'D “L¢ 

‘Poul SLUB_ BjoontUvIs ‘DH ‘O¢ 

‘}edoD (suy9"H) yned-19-19L19pLy °D “SE 
‘Jodo (‘jedoD) erosoysijop 'D “PE 
auIn|g 19udTUOd ‘FD ‘EE 

siivdg (‘[adod) ovtsuouiajo 1p “zZE 

auinjg vsoydsavs ry “| ¢ 

‘jadoy (‘jedop) stsuv08u0g Dy “Y¢ 
owing (ounjg) essodspe siptuUBsn “67 
‘edo ([9Z) Bessipopunsasqns *> *gz 
wN}OH (Maply) BynuILUgns *> °2Z 


naipsel, FAY" (HE) enpuedas *> “gz 


197 


PARRIS: GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW GUINEA 


‘(WIQORE-OOSE) Son 


-IUNLULUOD dUIdyEgns “WS “(QOS E-009Z) IS2404 SURIUOUL Joddn “4A (LUQO9T-OOT 1) ISAIOJ BULIVOW J9MO] ALT “(LUT 1-008) 805 |]!Y “AH 


BOUIND) MIN O} BISAR[RIY ‘Ud 
soutddijiyg ‘oow0g 

OoWOg 0} puRyey] 

ROUIND MAN 0} OOWIOg 
souiddijiyg ‘oauw0g 

BOUIND) MAN O} BRUINS 
ooUOg ‘eyRUINS 

sesonbieyy 0) Bye] US 

‘S] UOWIOJOS 0} puRpeYyy 
d1Wapus OdUIOg 

BOUIND) MAN O} BISALRY “Ud 
BOUIND) MON O} BARS 

BOUIND) MAN 0} BIPUT S 
BIUIND) MIN, 0} CAWOg 
BOUIND) MOXj 0} BISALIRI “Ud 
"S| sesanbseyy 0} eIpuy § 
BOUIND MAX O} puRyeY 
d1LUapUd OdUIOg 

sourddijiyd 01 BIsy 4S 

BOWS 0} BIPUT S 

o1luapus nyeqeury jNop 
BOUIND MAN O} BILLINGS 
nyenur, 0} eayeung 


AW) 


AWN AWT 
AWN AWT 


Wt (OTC-OOS | 
W (06T-OOLT 
W OOLT-O0TI 
W QOOE-OOET 
W OOIT 

W OOFE-OOLT 
WwW OOPCT-O0F | 
W QOOE-O0S I 
W YOTE-OONS | 
WwW OOO! 

W 009T-008 I 
W (06T-00SC 
Ut OORT-O0S | 
WOO1C-O0S I 
W OO8E-006C 
W 006C-00T1 
W QOTC-OOS I 
W OOIT 

W OOS 1-00T1 
W008 

Ww OOOE-O0FT 
W QO0O0E-00S I 
W O00E-008 I 


‘jodo,y (owing) epyneuurdgns "yx *97 
SLUvd (OD 3 BOW’) edivoipnu "x ‘G/ 
wnyyoH (ayo’a) usnuAuoaty "Xx “PZ 
SLueg (oyeg) SOploiIpoxey "| EL 

stueg (‘jadod) asusuosjey “fp *7Z 

sued (Suing) Wingelosey pT L 

sluvg (Joyeg) USNS WUINTPOWY Lf ‘OL 
“MAIOPLY (UYNy) LUINIwOINS “S "69 

“MIOpLY (atuN}E) wuNyjisnd “g “g9 

“pour slueg wUNUUTTLOBIs “"S “79 

‘MIAPLY (UYNS) a]IGop LUNssO[TOIIIIS “99 
dd DW (azuny Xd dwn] g) BSO]NUDA ‘gq ‘S9 
HOW (owing) eyenbiygo “q “p9 

sued (jadod) eyepneonjnw “g “¢9 

Jado) (1oxeE 7 “TONA) BOdBI|[BARP “qd *79 
[SAld’ (Iss94'yH) ensyuod ‘g “19 
‘SIRM|'Y ZW BMBBKY (QWIN]E]) BIIGI]99 ‘gq ‘09 
‘POU SLUIBY SISUDDUIOG ‘qd *6S 
IUD W (aye) vypAydosyyeseg “g 8 
IsLYyD'H (ouinyg) viepe endesosg *L¢ 
‘poul SLUR BfOOTRUTRYIN "Fy ‘OCG 

‘jadod (s94eq) BURBUINS "FD ‘SS 

‘jadog (sayvg) sadnsiuqeos tH “pS 


a 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


198 


"S| UOWO]OS 0} vISy AS 
ROUIND MON 0} BBN 
ISOMB[NG ‘ooulOg 
o1WIapud CoUIOg 

ift,y 0} eISY JS 

OoulOg 0} ByBUUINS 
BOUIND MON 0} BISAReI “Ud 
BOUIND MAN 0} BISY FS 
ooulog ‘eyeunsg 
nyenue, 0} pueypreyy 

“S| AJOI90§ 0} vIPU] 
nyenue, 0} vIsy AS 
ROUIND MON 0} OdUIOg 
BOUND) MON O} BALL 

‘S] UOWO]OS 0} BISY 4S 
BOUIND MIN 0} BISY AS 
‘S] UOWIOJOS 0} BISAR] RIA ‘Udg 
BOUIND MON 0} OoUIOg 
dIWIApUs OSUIOg 
saurddiyiyg 07 pueprey,y 
sedON]OP| 0} BISY FS 


uoOnngLsig 


AWN 

qT 

JANN AWT 
‘SAWT AT 


u0oNeI980A, 


Ww 0091 

W 0071 
WOOLI 

W 00S 1-006 
W 0081-0001 
WwW QOLI 

W OOET 

W OO0ET-00IZ 
W 00r 

W (QOQOT-00EI 
W OQOTI-00Z 
WW QOS 1-007 1 
W 00€T-0007 
W 0081-0071 
UW (081-00L1 
W 0007-006 
WwW 0061 

tu O08 I 

WW QOL1-00F1 
W QO81T-00S1 
W OO81-00T1 


apmnty 


BMBSEL (UYNY XO “Nal) BULLIOSel ‘FD “1 Z 

‘jodod essoidutt 5 “QZ 

‘JedoD GsuyD"H) Yned-y-1ovapLy 'D “6] 

‘Jado (Jado) sisus0Buo0g ‘FH *g] 

auinyg (ownjg) esiadspe sniutuesn */ | 

wiN}OH CAJop]y) BINUIUIGNs ‘> ‘9] 

‘WS 'f (euN]g) suBINU “Dp “S| 

aZUNyY (OWIN|g 7 S9dN) BUIOSITJOW “> “p] 

Sled (MIOp| VY) BISYOOIG *D “E] 

WIN}JOH (MJaply) BSOUDAIAAIG *D *Z] 

Japan 2 laude’ H’A\ (Ad) saprouydsaq sisajdouayy *| | 
sled (Joyeg) vuvlavsssnur siuuessosAsyy ‘| 
‘pour Suey SNIpuosal“g *6 

‘poul sLuvg snyeunoad “5 

Jodo, (ulwog) snuviuasssany ‘5 

‘Jado9 (994) silos “9 

[SA1q*D (Suin|g 2 SdeN) snre]]Nond “> 
‘jadoy (asnesg) smeordnpuos +5 

Poul sie sisusauog UOpOWUATeD 

‘jadoD (4axeq) snyAydojdans “y 

Jodo, (asiyd"H) tned-j9-1oLepiy sniosolny 


m™ o6 


—Narwtune 


sapods 


‘NN, Bunun jo avaoepyiuwesy “p aquy, 


199 


PARRIS: GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW GUINEA 


‘(WOOET-009|) ISd0} suRUOW J9ddn “AIA ‘(WOD6 | -OO) ISAO} OULIVOL JOMO] “YT “(LUQOR-OO]) Sa1OJUTeA puLpMO] “477 


oauJog 0} puryieyy 
OdUOg 0} BISAR]R “Ud 
d1lUapus OaWOg 
soutddipiyg ‘oauiog 
sesanbieyy 0} ByUe] US 
"S] UOWO]OS 0} puLyeYyL 
d1Wapua OaUlOg 
d1lapua CaO g 

‘S| Sesonbsey] 0} BIpUy § 
BOUIND MON O} pueyey L 
d1apua OdUOg 
soulddijiyg 01 BISy 4S 
BOLURS O} PIPU] S 
ODUIOG 0} BISARR “Ud 
BOUIND) MON O} BIRWING 
ISOMBINS 0} BIBUING 
d1luapua OaUIOg 


‘S] UOWO]OS 0} ByUR] US 


souiddiyiyg 0) eryeuins 
BOUIND MON 0} BAJBUINS 
‘S] UOLUOJOS 0} B.BLUNS 


ifi.J 01 BISAR]eYY JB]NsUIUDY 


AW AT 
cig 

AW 

AW 

AW’ AT 
JANN AWT 
dW 

dW 

AW dT 
dW AW 
AWN 
AW1 AT 
AWT 47 
qT 

AWN 
JNO AW 


W OO8 1-00F 
W009 

w 00S | 

W O08 1 

WW OO8 1-007 
W 00-009 | 
W 0071-0001 
W 0091-006 
W O08 1-00 
W Q0CTT-008 | 
W OOET 

WW QO8-009 

WwW OQOTI-O01 
W QO 

WwW QO0T 

W 0007-008 I 
W Q00C-00F | 
WOOL 

W 0007 

W OOET 

W 0071-0001 
W Q00C 


winnporH (ay gD) usnuiAuosaty "Xx “Ep 
‘jadoy (‘sa,j) suaprusaye stuajdoydiy “Zp 
SUB (SLUR) DSUdYBMBILS “Lp 

sled (jadoy) asuauosjey tuniaway | ‘Op 
“MOply (UyNY) WiNwd]Ns “S “BE 

‘Map| Yy (auinyg) tunjjisnd “g “gE 

“Poul SLUBY WIN] |IOBIT “S “LE 


IYO’ (4oyeg) wintpojisses9 wiNsso[soI19]9g ‘O¢ 


[Sd (IS1O4'D) ENB UOd ‘g “SE 
“SIBM[ SY WZ BMBSL] (DUNE) BdIGQI]99 ‘g “PE 
‘Poul SLUR SISUIDUIOY ‘g “EE 

dH DW (oye) eyAydosyyeseg ‘g ‘7 
ISLIYD' H (auinyg) eyeye endesolg “[¢ 
SLU (AY DD) BlOP BWIA Ty “OE 
‘jadog (4ayegq) BuRABUINS TF “67 

OUIN|E] BSOIDS Ty ‘QZ 

‘jedod soplonpsemulal ‘D *LZ 

suIN| | MMpseMulsl LT) “97 

auinyg Bjnosnisoyid ‘fy “¢Z 

‘Jado (4ayeg) sisuadueped ‘Fy ‘pZ 
‘jadod (sayeg) BIR}odoURIGO ‘DH '€Z 
‘JadoD (19yeq) BUBIPIOJsINUY *D “ZZ 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


198 


"S] UOLUO]OS 0} BISY 4S 
BOUIND MON 0} BIVBUINS 
ISAMP[NS “OIUIOG 
SIWWUOpUd OdUIOg 

fly 01 BISY 4S 

OsUIOg 0} BIVBUINS 
BOUIND MON 0} BISARTRIA, “Ud 
BOUIND MON 0} BISY FS 
ooulOg ‘PBVeUUNS 
nyenuva O} puryiey 

*s] AJOIN0S 0} BIPUT 
njenued 0} vISyY 4S 
BOUIND MAN 0} CdUIOg 
BOUIND) MAN O} BARS 

‘S] UOLUOJOS 0} BISY FS 
BOUIND MON 0} BISY 4S 
"S] UOLUO]OS 0} BISAR]RIY “Ud 
BOUIND MAN 0} COUIOg 
SIWApUd OSUIOG 
sourddiyiyg 0} pueypreyy 
seoonjopy O01 BISV FS 


uonNqLysiq 


AW 

dW 

dW] 

dW 
AWN 

ATT 

JINN AW 
‘SANT AT 


AWT 
AW] 
AWN AWT 
AWA 
SW 
AW 
AW 
AW 


UORIIBIA, 


WwW O09T 

W Q0cI 
WOOL! 

We OOS 1-006 
W (081-0001 
WOOL! 

1 O0EC 

W QOET-OOIC 
W OOP 

W Q00C-00E! 
WwW Q0CT1-00C 
W QO81-O0TI 
W OQOET-O00T 
W 0081-001 
W 0081-0021 
W QO0C-006 
WwW 0061 
woos! 

W QOL1-O0FI 
W O08 1-008 1 
W 008 T-00CI 


apmanty 


BMeSeL (UYNY X9 “Wap\) BURLIOSel DH “|Z 

‘Jado essaidut "pb “(QZ 

‘Jado (suyD'H) yNed-1-19UapLy ‘DH “| 

‘jadog (‘jadod) sisuso3u0g FH ‘g] 

sun} g (ouwin]g) esiodspe situwelD */ | 

wunyjoOH CMJaply) Binurwiqns “> *9| 

‘wS'f (oun; g) suRInuU “yD “S| 

azuny (SWIN|G 2 SddN) BUIODTTJOU “D “pI 

SLB (MIOP[Y) eBISYOOIg “Dd “¢] 

Wn}JOH (MIOPly) BSOUDAIADIG “D ‘Z| 

JOYIOIN 2 19UsSeA\’ HA (ADIN) saprlouysayq siajdouay *| | 
SLUeg (JOyeg) VURIARISSNW SIIWULUPISOSAIYD “(| 
‘poul sLUeg SNIPUOdaAI "Dy “6 

‘poul slueg smeunsad yg 

Jado (uluiog) snueiuassian] “QL 

‘Jodo (994) sypoeis “9 

[SAudg’) (OuIN]g 2 S2AaN) smeR]]NOND "Dg 
‘Jado (asneig) smeoydnpuos yp 

Poul SLB SISUIDUIOG UOPOLIWIATR  “¢ 

‘JadoD (s9y4eq) snyjAydoidans y °z 

Jado (suy)'H) Wned-ja-1ouaplLy sniosoly 


— 


saodsg 


‘NYY Sununy jo asvaoepniwutuey “p apqey 


199 


GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW GUINEA 


PARRIS 


‘(WUQOEZ-009 |) ISes0} SURJUOUW! Jaddn “4A “(WD 1-008) ISAUOJ OURJUOL IOMO] “IAT “(LUQOS-OO |) asofures puL] MO] “477 


oOdUOg 0} puRyey | 
OIUIOG 0} BISAR[RIA, “Ud 
dIWOpUd OdUIOg 
soulddijiyg ‘ooulog 
sesonbivyy 0] ByURT] LS 
“S| UOLUOJOS O} puLpeYy 
SIWIAPUd OdUIOG 
dIWIapUd OdUIOG 

“s] sesonbieyy 0} eIpuy § 
BOUIND MON OF puR[eyL 
dIWIDpUd OdUIOG 
soulddijiyd 01 eIsy 4S 
BOIS 0} BIPU] S 
oOdUIOg 0} BISAR[RI “Ud 
BOUIND MON O} BVRUUNG 
ISAMPING 0} BIVRUUNG 
dIWIAPUS OSUIOG 


‘S] UOWO]OS 0} ByURT US 


soutddiyiyg 0} Byewing 
BOUINDH MAN O} BATBUINS 
“S] UOLUOJOS 0} BIVBUINS 


iff 0) BISkee Je[NsuIUdg 


AW dT 
al 

AW) 

JWT 

AW 47 
JW) AW 
AW 

AW 

AW 47 
AW) AW) 
AWN 
AW’ AT 
AAT dT 
AT 

JWA 
JW) AW 
JW) AWT 
AW] 
JIA 
JW 
AW 
AWN 


W QO81-00P 
WwW Q09 
woos! 

WwW 0081 

W QO8 1-007 
W QOPC-0091 
W Q0T1-0001 
W 0091-006 
W QO81-00S 
W QO0CC-O08 I 
W 00ET 

W (08-009 
WQ0cI-O001 
W (YOT 

W QOOT 

W QOO0C-O008 I 
W Q00C-O00F I 
W OOLI 

W Q00T 

W (QOET 
WOQO0cI-O0001 
W (Q00T 


wnyjOH (41YyD'D) HsnwiAUOsoIY KX “Ep 
‘Jadoy (sag) suspiusayye suaidoydiy “Zp 
SILIVG (SLUR) ISUDYBMPBILS “| | P 

sued (Jado) asuduosjey wuNIaWaYy_] “Op 
“MIOpLy (uyNy) WiNnwes[Ns “Ss ‘“6¢ 

‘MJaplV (auiN|g) uiNnifisnd “s “gE 

“POUl SLUR WINLUT]IOBIS “S “7 ¢ 


IYO (dye) WiNOFIsseid WINssO[SOII[IS “OE 


[SAlg’D (1S104'H) eNSNUOd ‘g “SE 
‘SIEM SY AW BMEBL] (DUNG) BdIGaI{29 ‘g “PE 
‘Poul SLUBY SISUIDUIOG ‘q “€¢ 

dd DW (oyeg) ey Aydosyreseg “g “7E 
SYD H (ouinjg) eieye endesolg “1 ¢ 
SLUR (IY DD) BYOJIENIA D “OE 
‘jadog (s9yeg) BuRIRUUNS FD “67 

UN] BSOIdS ‘FD “BZ 

‘jadoD saplonpsieMuldal D * LZ 

oe eee a 

auinyg eynosnisojid y “SZ 

‘jadoy (4ayeg) sisuosueped 1 “PZ 
‘jadoy (49y4Bg) BIR[OIDURIGO FD “¢Z 
‘jadoD (A9yeg) BuRIPIOJsINUY DH “ZZ 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


200 


eV 
%00 “0 
ILL 
%IT 6 
%IS “CT 
%CI “Ss 


nny sununsy 


OL Ss OS [B10] salads 
%Cl “6 %91 "6 %0L MWapus AY]EIO] *¢ 
%OL “S %0T “I %IE “OT 1Wapus ANUNO) “p 
%el “OL %9I “6 %0L “YP (WD “MID BISoTRI MA JO CU PIN) BISOTRI AE 
“8S “Pr 49S “TE Ep “PT OUI] S,JISUL]JOZ SsO1OK JsRa] Iv JO ‘puOAd ATIYSIS JO apIM-vISaTR *Z 
%I1 ‘8 %06 ‘S %OL ‘Pb ByUR] LIS 1O/pue eISOUATOd 0} “BISaTRIY puoOAdQ peaidsapiAA *| 
nyeqeury yA, OSpry apoyany, =—s BARE JUNOT uOnNLysip s1ydess005 


sa1dads [e}0) JO 9dv)UIII0d puK ‘ou SaIdads 


npn sununy pue nyeqeury nop) ‘aspry spayinypy “VAs JUNOPY JO svadepHIUWeIDH JO UONGLASIG d1Yydeis0ayH “s aquy 


PARRIS: GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW GUINEA 201 


DISCUSSION 

Compared with Murkele Ridge, Mount Kinabalu and Gunung Mulu, Mount Jaya has 
many more country endemics. This reflects the explosive speciation of Grammitidaceae 
in New Guinea (together with many other groups of plants) and their distribution along 
the central ranges of the island. The wide distribution of species along the central ranges 
of New Guinea is probably also an explanation for the low number of endemic species 
compared with Mount Kinabalu and Murkele Ridge. While Mount Jaya is the highest 
peak in a series of high altitude peaks on the ranges that form the backbone of New 
Guinea, Murkele Ridge and Mount Kinabalu are isolated from other areas at high 
altitudes. Mount Jaya and Gunung Mulu have fewer species that are widespread in 
Malesia and beyond than do Murkele Ridge and Mount Kinabalu. Gunung Mulu, being 
relatively low altitude, does not have the array of habitats or even comparable areas of 
the same habitats as do the higher Murkele Ridge and Mount Kinabalu. The reason for 
Mount Jaya having fewer of the widespread species is less obvious. In the discussion of 
Murkele Ridge (see above), seven widespread species are mentioned that are absent 
from Mount Jaya, but present in New Guinea and thus to be expected. Another two 
species that occur on Mount Kinabalu and are disjunct with Papua New Guinea are also 
expected on Mount Jaya. They are Calymmodon atrichus and Grammitis clemensiae. 

There is a group of 10 grammitid species that have been collected on all of the four 
montane Malesian localities documented here: they are Calymmodon cucullatus, 
Chrysogrammitis musgraviana, Ctenopteris blechnoides, C. nutans, Grammitis 
knutsfordiana, G. padangensis, G. sumatrana, Prosaptia contigua, Scleroglossum 
pusillum and S. sulcatum. Two other widespread high altitude subalpine species are not 
found on Gunung Mulu (2400 m alt.) because it is too low: Grammitis locellata 
(2800-3800 m) and Prosaptia davalliacea (2800-3800 m). Another group of species, 
Calymmodon clavifer, Ctenopteris denticulata ,C. millefolia, C. subsecundodissecta, 
Grammitis dolichosora, G. intromissa, G. scabristipes, Prosaptia obliquata, P. venulosa 
and Xiphopteris subpinnatifida occur on Mount Jaya, Murkele Ridge and Mount 
Kinabalu within the altitudinal range of Gunung Mulu and may be expected there. The 
widespread Grammitis reinwardtii is absent from Mount Jaya, but occurs in the other 
three localities. The species that are absent from Gunung Mulu and from Mount Jaya, 
together with the 10 listed above, form a core of 23 grammitid species that are 
widespread and common throughout Malesia. Examination of herbarium collections 
during preparation of the account of Grammitidaceae for Flora Malesiana has provided 
much detailed data on species distribution that has been collated for over 500 localities. 
The core group of 23 grammitid species is well-represented in the following localities, 
each of which has 20 or more species of Grammitidaceae. The altitude range over which 
Grammitidaceae have been collected and the number of species currently known is 
given for each locality. Peninsular Malaysia: Cameron Highlands, 1400-2000 m, 23 
species; Gunung Tahan, 600-2200 m, 21 species; Sumatra, Gunung Kerinci. 300-3800 
m, 22 species: Java, Gunung Gede, 1200-3000 m, 39 species; Sulawesi, Mount Roroka 
Timbu, 1200-2400 m, 25 species: Philippines, Mount Apo, 1000-3000 m, 25 species: 
Papua, Mount Trikora, 2800-4200 m, 36 species, Idenberg River, 700-2200 m, 22 
species; Papua New Guinea, Aseki, 1300-1800 m, 20 species, Ekuti Range at 
Watut-Aseki Divide, 2000-2100 m, 22 species, Mount Giluwe, 2100-4100 m, 38 
species, Mount Hagen, 2400-4000 m, 34 species, Rawlinson Range, 1500-4000 m, 33 
species, Saruwaged Range, 1200-4000 m, 40 species, Star Mountains, 1400-4000 m, 24 
species, Mount Suckling, 400-3700 m, 20 species, Mount Wilhelm, 2700-4500 m, 26 


202 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 183-203. 2005 


species. 

The identification of pteridophytes below the subalpine and alpine areas of Mount 
Jaya is not yet complete (R.J. Johns pers. comm.), so a complete evaluation of the 
relationships of the pteridophyte flora is not yet possible. Ridley (1916) records a 
number of pteridophytes from Mount Jaya, however, and this is sufficient to establish 
that there is a core of widespread pteridophytes i in families other than Grammitidaceae 
that are also present on Mount Kinabalu (Parris ef a/., 1992), Murkele Ridge (Parris, 
1993) and Gunung Mulu (Parris, unpublished). They include Asplenium tenerum G. 
Forst., Diplazium cordifolium Blume, Lindsaea rigida J. Sm. (Kato, 1992), 
Lycopodiella cernua (L.) Pic. Serm., Ophioglossum pendulum L. (Kato, 1989b), 
Selliguea enervis (Cav.) Ching and Trichomanes pallidum Blume. 


CONCLUSIONS 

Mount Jaya has some unique features compared with the other Malesian mountains 
considered here: the presence of a rich grammitid flora in the heath forests between 200 
and 600 m alt. is unexpected, and there is a good representation of widespread New 
Guinea endemic Grammitidaceae. The absence of high altitude endemics in the family 
is surprising, given that several other high New Guinea mountains have one or more 
endemic species. Mount Jaya is much less species-rich than Mount Kinabalu, and this 
may be explained at least in part by the much longer history of collecting on the latter 
and the paucity of collections from the largely inaccessible upper montane forest of the 
former. Compared with Mount Jaya, the Murkele Ridge, 2000 m lower, supports a rich 
flora of Grammitidaceae, but the reason for this is not evident. 

Zollinger’s line does not present an insuperable barrier to the distribution of 
Grammitidaceae, as 59 (45 %) of the 130 species listed in Tables | to 4 occur on both 
sides of it. 

The concept of a core Malesian-wide pteridophyte flora present in all suitable areas 
has not been suggested previously, but there is ample evidence for it in 23 species of 
Grammitidaceae and numerous species in other pteridophyte families. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
I wish to thank Robert Johns and Peter Edwards (K) for organising the loans of Kew 
specimens, Alison Paul (BM) for seeking out Kloss’ collections, the Keepers of BM and 
K for the loan of material and Ewen Cameron (AK) for facilitating the loans. 


REFERENCES 

JOHNS, R.J. et al. in prep. A guide to the subalpine and alpine flora of Mount Jaya, 
New Guinea. Royal Botanic Garden, Kew. 

KATO, M. 1989a. The fern flora of Seram. In: BAAS, P., KALKMAN, K. & 
GEESINK, R. (Eds) The Plant Diversity of Malesia, pp. 225-234. Kluwer, 
Dordrecht. 

KATO, M. 1989b. Taxonomic Studies of Pteridophytes of Ambon and Seram 
(Moluccas) Collected by Indonesian- Japanese Botanical Expeditions. III. 
Eusporangiate and Some Lower Leptosporangiate Families. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 
0: 77-92. 

KATO, M. 1992. Taxonomic Studies of Pteridophytes of Ambon and Seram (Moluccas) 
Collected by Indonesian-Japanese Botanical Expeditions. IX. Woodsiaceae, 
Lindsaeaceae, and Adiantaceae. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sec. III, 15: 135-152. 


PARRIS: GRAMMITIDACEAE OF MOUNT JAYA, NEW GUINEA 203 


KATO, M. & PARRIS, B.S. 1992. Taxonomic Studies of Pteridophytes of Ambon and 
Seram (Moluccas) Collected by Indonesian-Japanese Botanical Expeditions. VII. 
Grammitidaceae. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sec. III, 15: 111-133. 

PARRIS, B.S. 1983. A taxonomic revision of the genus Grammitis Swartz 
(Grammitidaceae: Filicales) in New Guinea. Blumea 29: 13-222. 

PARRIS, B.S. 1993. Studies on the Phytogeography and Altitudinal Zonation of the 
Pteridophyte Flora of Seram. In: EDWARDS, I.D., MACDONALD, A.A. & 
PROCTOR, J. (Eds) Natural History of Seram, Maluku, Indonesia, pp. 75-89. 
Intercept, Andover. 

ARRIS, B.S. 2001. Taxonomy of Malesian Grammitidaceae in relation to ecology and 
phytogeography. In SAW, L.G., CHUA, L.S.L. & KHOO, K.C. (Eds) Taxonomy, the 
Cornerstone of Biodiversity, pp 155-160. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala 
Lumpur. 

PARRIS, B.S. unpublished. A Checklist of Pteridophytes from Gunung Mulu National 
Park. 

PARRIS, B.S., BEAMAN, R.S. & BEAMAN, J,H. 1992. The Plants of Mount 
Kinabalu. 1. Ferns and Fern Allies. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 

RIDLEY, H.N. 1916. Report on the botany of the Wollaston Expedition to Dutch New 
Guinea. Trans. Linn. Soc. London (Bot.) 2, 9: 1-269. 

WALLACE, A.R. 1869. The Malay Archipelago. Macmillan, London. 


204 FERN GAZ. 17(4). 2005 


MORPHOGENETIC EVENTS IN THE CERATOPTERIS RICHARDIT 
(PARKERIACEAE: PTERIDOPHYTA) SHOOT APEX 


M. ROMANOVA! & J. JERNSTEDT” 


Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, David, 
CA 95616, USA. (Email: 'maromanova@ucdavis.edu; “jernstedt(@davis.edu) 


Keywords: Shoot apex meristem, shoot apical cell, leaf apical cell, leaf primordium, 
plasmodesmata, morphogenesis, development, dictyostele, protostele 


The discovery of developmentally important genes, combined with remarkably regular 
cell division patterns, has made the Ceratopteris richardii sporophyte an advantageous 
system for developmental studies. Here we report results of an investigation of the 
ontogenetic changes in shoot apical meristem (SAM) structure associated with leaf 
initiation and histogensis in C. richardii. As described for a number of other ferns, the 
shoot apical cell (AC) and leaf apical cell (LAC) of the first leaf of C. richardii embryos 
appear simultaneously; all subsequent sporophyte leaves originate from the SAM. An 
LAC originates in every immediate derivative of the tetrahedral AC. After this segment 
is displaced from the AC by two, more recent derivatives, it undergoes two anticlinal 
divisions and one transverse division, setting up the LAC. The pattern of LAC origin 
does not change during sporophyte ontogeny, but the rhythm of leaf development does. 
For the first leaves of a young sporophyte, the subsequent division of the AC is 
correlated with further proliferation of cells of the incipient leaf primordium (LP), and 
the AC does not undergo further divisions until the LP is established. Development of 
the first 6-9 leaves is followed by a developmental pause of 12-20 days, during which 
the shoot apex changes its structure and morphogenetic pattern. LPs are arrested at the 
4- or 5-cell stage until displaced some distance from the AC, which continues to 
segment and creates an increasing “pool” of early stage LPs. This results in an 
elongated shape for the shoot apex. These changes are correlated with changes in the 
shoot vascular system. A protostele is found in the young sporophytes with simple 
leaves developing without pause; each leaf has a unibundle leaf trace (LT). Dictyosteles 
occur in older sporophytes bearing compound leaves; these leaves start to develop when 
separated from the AC by a number of incipient LPs, and have 2-5 bundles per LT. 
Procambium differentiates simultaneously with LP development: no signs of vascular 
differentiation are observed in either the juvenile or the adult shoot apex. Ontogenetic 
changes in stelar type might be explained by the loss of meristem identity and 
competence to differentiate into procambium by the central cells of the apex. This is in 
agreement with Sano et a/. (unpublished observation) that KNOX class | genes are 
expressed in the AC and procambium of C. richardii adult sporophytes (but not in the 
other cells of the elongated apex). Because plasmodesmata (PD) provide selective 
routes for signaling within the shoot apex, we examined PD architecture and 
distribution in the C. richardii SAM. All PD in the C. richardii SAM are primary. PD 
density in the AC and its immediate derivatives does not change significantly in 
sporophyte ontogeny but is about ten-fold higher than reported for dicot SAMs. High 
PD density and the resulting intercellular connectedness may compensate for the lack 
of ability to form secondary PD. Only the AC and its two immediate derivatives, the 
latter being constantly displaced, are interpreted to be undifferentiated in the C. 
richardii SAM. 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 205-215. 2005 205 


REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES AND POPULATION STRUCTURE 
IN THE ENDANGERED PTERIDOPHYTE TRICHOMANES 
SPECIOSUM (HYMENOPHYLLACEAE: PTERIDOPHYTA) 


FJ. RUMSEY’, J.A. BARRETT”, M. GIBBY’, S.J. RUSSELL! 
& J.C. VOGEL! 


'Dept. of Botany, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK. 
“Dept. of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; 
*Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, UK. 
(Email: F.Rumsey@nhm.ac.uk) 


Keywords: Glacial refugia, gametophyte, historical biogeography, dispersal, filmy- 


ABSTRACT 

Trichomanes speciosum Willd. (Hymenophyllaceae) is unique amongst 
European ferns in that the gametophyte generation can survive indefinitely in the 
absence of the sporophyte, propagate vegetatively and disperse locally. 
Reproductive success, both in terms of spore production and sporophytic 
recruitment currently vary widely across the species’ broad, disjunct range, 
declining from south to north and west to east. Reproductive success would 
appear to be controlled largely by climatic factors, although genetic components 
also must be considered. Detailed study of populations throughout the species’ 
range, over a 15 year period, have led to a greater understanding of growth rates, 
powers of dispersal and the reproductive strategies currently operating. Using 
this knowledge, the extent and pattern of genetic variation regionally and locally, 
i.e within sites, can be used to infer the routes and mechanisms of colonisation 
and subsequent reproductive history. 

Many sites for this species have been considered as glacial refugia, 1.e., 
supporting relictual populations through cycles of glaciation throughout the 
Tertiary. The validity of these claims is tested using molecular and other data. 


INTRODUCTION 

Trichomanes speciosum Willd. (syn. Vandenboschia speciosa (Willd.) Kunkel), the 
Killarney Fern, is the sole native European representative of the genus 7richomanes 
sensu lato (Tutin et al., 1993) and the largest of the region’s filmy-ferns 
(Hymenophyllaceae). It has been considered one of the continent’s most vulnerable 
lant species, threatened both by habitat destruction and long the victim of 
over-collection, and has been accorded legal protection throughout its range under the 

Bern Convention (Anon, 1979) and E.C. Habitats Directive (Anon, 1992). 
Trichomanes speciosum is unique amongst European ferns in that its gametophytic 
generation is perennial, gemmiferous and capable of persisting and dispersing in the 
absence of a sporophyte. This “gametophytic independence’ is apparently a very rare 
condition amongst homosporous ferns, and known in three families, all widespread as 
epiphytes in tropical regions: the Vittariaceae, the Grammitidaceae, and the 
Hymenophyllaceae. However, gametophytic independence is apparently only well 
developed in those rare species found at the temperate extremes of these families’ 


206 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 205-215. 2005 


ranges (Rumsey & Sheffield, 1996). 

Independent gametophytes of a Trichomanes species were first tentatively identified 
from eastern North America by Wagner & Evers (1963) and confirmed by Farrar (1967, 
1985, 1992) who identified a distinct taxon, 7 intricatum Farrar (Farrar, 1992) 
represented solely by gametophyte populations.This taxon was found to exist far to the 
north of the line of the last glacial maximum, indicating it clearly had the ability to 
disperse over some distance, even if sporophytes and hence spores were currently not 
produced. The other widespread North American species of Trichomanes have been 
found as gametophyte populations but always in close proximity to sites in which 
sporophytes are present (Farrar, 1993). The situation in Europe falls between these 
extremes and differs in scale, in that both generations of 7. speciosum are known, but 
the gametophyte has an extensive range (hundreds of kilometres) beyond that of the 
sporophyte. 


Reproductive Potential and Strategies 

The sporophyte of 7 speciosum has a long-running, branching rhizome, at intervals 
bearing fronds which are functional for 4 or more years, and may persist for longer. 
Rhizome growth rates are heavily dependant on the plant’s nutrient status and climatic 
environment but main axes may elongate by over 30 cm per annum, although usually 
by much less. Suppressed side branches borne in the sporophyll axils allow for steady 
patch formation should the leader not find suitable habitat and die. This growth form 
allows a guerrilla-type growth strategy similar to that employed by species of 
Lycopodium to exploit patchy environments (Callaghan et al.,1986). Specialised 
mechanisms of vegetative propagation are absent (viviparous plantlets have been 
recorded twice in cultivated material over two centuries of observation (Druery, 1910; 
Ensoll, pers comm.)). Rhizome fragmentation, dislodgement and re-growth are likely to 
be infrequent but significant events. Extensive, intricate and usually dense patches form 
with time. Within these it is generally impossible to determine the number of 
individuals present without recourse to molecular techniques. Individual clones 
covering several hundred square metres have been recorded by the authors in the 
Azores, obviously indicative of considerable antiquity. However, colony size is not 
necessarily an accurate indication of age. Several British colonies known for over a 
century are very restricted in size, their maximal extent presumably determined by the 
extent of the micro-features that they grow in. 

Unlike many European ferns Trichomanes speciosum is not fertile annually once 
mature. Indeed Ratcliffe er al., (1993) reported that the majority of British sporophytes 
had never been seen to be fertile. Detailed investigation of fertility is difficult and in 
many cases not desirable because of the nature of the sites occupied. However, during 
the last decade four Welsh and two English sporophytes known to the authors have at 
least attempted to produce spores. Involucres have formed but the receptacular bristle 
upon which the sporangia are spirally borne has, in at least two of the sites, not extended 
and no spores have formed as a consequence. This receptacular bristle structure has a 
basal meristem and presumably continues to elongate and produce new sporangia until 
a certain trigger, perhaps desiccation causing sporangial dehiscence, causes it to cease. 
Its failure to develop in marginal British sites may have climatic cause, such as 
exposure to cold. This and the factors determining the onset of fertility are almost 
certainly complex and have not been established for 7. speciosum. Anecdotal evidence 
would seem to suggest that sporophytes in extreme shade are less regularly fertile and, 


RUMSEY et al.: REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN T: SPECIOSUM 207 


as most plants at the more northern and marginal extremes of the species range are 
progressively restricted to more sheltered and hence usually darker microsites, this 
alone may account for the reduction in northern fertility. Considerable variation exists 
in the degree of fertility, i.e. the number of involucres produced — dictated by frond 
stature and dissection, and the number of sporangia produced per involucre, as outlined 
above. Sporophytes in northern and more easterly British sites are invariably small and 
relatively poorly dissected, reducing sporing potential. Calculations based on 
observation of the number of fertile fronds known in all British populations for one 
year, an estimated mean number of involucres per frond and numbers of sporangia per 
involucre, suggested that the total British spore production per decade would be 
considerably less than that produced by a single healthy adult Athyrium filix-femina in 
one year (Rumsey, 1994) ! The species is thus likely to be a poor coloniser by spore or 
vegetative means. 

Sporophyte recruitment parallels the pattern of spore production in that there is a 
marked reduction in the production of sporophytes northwards, 1.e. into northern France 
and the British Isles and even more markedly, eastwards into continental Europe. Thus 
within the wetter portions of Macaronesia the species functions as a “normal” 
pteridophyte, completing its life cycle from spore to spore, whereas elsewhere the cycle 
progressively breaks down, until over much of the species extensive distribution in 
northern and continental Europe the gametophyte is effectively functionally 
independent. Immature sporophytes have rarely been noted within the British Isles and 
show high levels of mortality (Rumsey, 1994), although recent years have perhaps 
shown an increased incidence in their production (“Sentinel”, 2003; Rumsey, unpubl.) 
which may be a reflection of the run of warm but wet summers and milder winters 
experienced in the British Isles. Immature sporophytes have also been reported in 
central Europe, eg. Rasbach er al., 1994 which indicates that gametangial production 
and normal function are occurring in at least some “independent” gametophytic clones. 
Given a potentially indefinite gametophytic lifespan the probability must be that 
sporophytes would form, although perhaps extremely infrequently, in the vast majority 
of populations. 

Sporophytic production and recruitment almost certainly is predominantly a 
reflection of the rate and extent of gametangial production. The archegoniophore is a 
comparatively massive, differentiated, multicellular structure unlike the simple 
irregular branching filamentous structure it is borne on. The processes triggering its 
initiation are unknown but rates of cell growth and light/nutrient availability might be 
implicated. The smaller antheridia are more regularly produced and may persist in a 
non-dehisced state for many months. Rumsey & Sheffield (1996) summarised 
knowledge on the in situ and ex situ production of gametangia by different British 
gametophyte clones over a 5 year period. They identified consistent sterility, or 
super-fertility, of some clones, even when sub-divided and grown apart under similar 
but not rigorously controlled growth conditions, suggesting a significant genetic 
component to gametangial production, but with no clear geographical, ecological or 
discernible historical basis. Locally this may complicate considerations of the effect of 
climatic and other external factors on gametangial production but broad regional 
differences, which are reflected in sporophyte recruitment, are still apparent. 


Understanding the Current Distribution- Refugia or Recent Colonisation? 
First detected as recently as 1989 (Rumsey ef al., 1990; 1991). subsequent survey has 


208 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 205-215. 2005 


revealed the gametophyte to be widespread but extremely localised within the British 
Isles, significantly occurring in many areas from which the sporophyte had never been 
reported (Rumsey et al., 1998). Similarly, as the distinctive habit and habitat of the 
gametophyte became known, discoveries across northern continental Europe rapidly 
followed, e.g. Vogel et a/., 1993; Rasbach ef al., 1994; Bennert et al, 1994; Bujnoch & 
Kottke, 1994: Kirsch & Bennnert, 1996; Horn & Elsner, 1997; Huck, 1997; Reichling, 
1997; Boudrie, 2001; Krippel, 2001, Loriot et a/., 2002, Kottke, 2003, etc. 

Initial reports were from deeply dissected sandstone massifs, such as the Petite 
Suisse of Luxembourg, the northern Vosges and the Elbsandsteingebirge, all areas noted 
for the occurrence of other rare, disjunct ‘Atlantic’ taxa (sensu Ratcliffe, 1968) but 
particularly the filmy-fern Hymenophyllum tunbrigense (L.) Sm. (Richards & Evans, 
1972). In these disjunct areas H. tunbrigense has been considered to be a Tertiary relict 
(Drude, 1902; Klein, 1926). Subsequent examination has revealed the gametophyte of 
Trichomanes speciosum to be more widely distributed and in less “exceptional” 
landforms and habitats in intervening regions in western and Central Europe, such that 
the recorded distribution of the species is now much less discontinuous and more 
extensive than previously realised. This raises interesting questions as to when this 
broader gametophyte distribution was achieved and from where? 

The broad continental and northern-European distribution of Trichomanes 
speciosum may have been achieved as a result of a wave of post-glacial migration from 
southern and western refugia, or conversely from limited diffusion from a range of 
more northerly peri-glacial refugia, or indeed result from an amalgam of both. Sites 
containing gametophytes alone may thus represent recent arrivals, or the tenacious 
survivors of a species uniquely suited to coping with a sub-optimal climate. Sadly, few 
relevant sub-fossil or palynological finds are known, or are realistically to be expected. 
Comparison with the distribution of other taxa can be informative, but elucidation of 
the species quarternary history is largely reliant on molecular studies of the pattern, 
extent and structure of genetic variation throughout the species range. Knowledge of the 
comparative reproductive and dispersive capabilities of the different generations can 
then be used to infer whether sporophytes were likely to be present historically in areas 
from which they are now unknown. 

Generally our expectation must be that sites which have been suitable for the 
peri-glacial survival of a particular species are likely to have allowed the survival of a 
Suite of taxa, and that this community, or many of its distinctive components may well 
recur in other disjunct refugial sites. The peculiar biology of Trichomanes speciosum 
and its ability to grow in conditions that are not conducive to the survival of all other 
vascular plants may, however, mean that it is a special case. 

We also expect refugial sites to support greater genetic diversity than those which 
have been recently colonised. A potential confounding factor is that of severe 
bottlenecking — low or no diversity may result from loss over time/genetic drift, as well 
as by founder effects. We must also consider that an_ efficiently 
vegetatively-reproducing organism of narrow ecological amplitude might effectively 
block niches and thus prevent the arrival of other individuals (“the first in wins”). 
Variation may then be reliant on the rates of mutation in the various ramets, although 
these would be expected to accrue with time, meeting our original expectation. Ancient 
refugial sites, if isolated, might be expected to show private variation, i.e. unique to 
them, although post-glacial dispersion, if efficient, will obscure such patterns. 


RUMSEY et al.: REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN T. SPECIOSUM 209 


Refugia or Not? 

Several disjunct areas are now known to support very small populations of Trichomanes 
speciosum, many of which have been discovered comparatively recently. Within these 
the relative proportion of sporophytes vs. gametophytes differs but many show 
comparably low levels of sporophytic presence and association of a suite of Atlantic 
species. Do they and their associated species show similar levels and patterns of genetic 
diversity and what can this reveal as to their history? 


Southern Spain 

Trichomanes speciosum was first discovered in Southern Spain by Richards (1934) and 
is now known from a very limited range of sierras leading inland from the coast near 
Algeciras, northwards to near Cortes de la Frontera (Rumsey & Vogel, 1998; Garrido 
Diaz & Hidalgo Maqueda, 1998). Currently nine populations are known to be extant, 
more than half (5) of which are thought to support fewer than 10 discrete sporophyte 
clumps each. Only one site (Sierra de Montecoche) currently contains gametophytes in 
the absence of sporophytes. The species main concentration is in the Sierra de Ojén and 
its westward continuation, the Sierra de Saladavieja. Here a total of approaching 200 
distinct mature regularly fertile sporophytic clumps, closely associated with small 
localised areas of gametophyte and numerous juvenile sporophytes, occur in 12 distinct 
sub-populations by parallel small watercourses. High levels of mortality, with extreme 
reductions, at least in sporophyte populations, linked with the cycles of cork-oak 
harvesting and climatic variation, have been documented in the recent past 
(Molesworth-Allen, 1977). 

Allozymic study of material from 3 sites: Sierra de Ojén (4 sub-populations), the 
Valle del Rio de la Miel and the Sierra de Montecoche, indicates that each site ha 
alleles not shared with the other sites (Table 1) and that the large Sierra de Ojeén site 
contained at least 16 different multilocus phenotypes (MLPs), 10 of which were present 
in the largest sampled sub-population. The observed differences between closely 
adjacent watercourses may indicate low levels of gene-flow even over such restricted 
ranges but patterns indicate the likelihood of intergametophytic mating within these 
sub-populations, with the fern fully completing its life cycle and behaving ina “normal” 
pteridophytic fashion, unlike populations further north in its range. 

These small populations co-exist with a limited range of Macaronesian bryophytes 
unknown elsewhere in Mainland Europe (Rumsey & Vogel, 1999) as well as other 
pteridophyte taxa, including Culcita macrocarpa, Diplazium caudatum, Pteris 
incompleta and previously Drvopteris guanchica — the latter suggesting a closest 
affinity with the Canarian flora. This floristic enclave, with fragmentary representation 
on the adjacent North African coast and into the Rif mountains, either represents the 
vestige of a once wider coastal African/C anarian/Iberian distribution fragmented by 
aridification and the increase of the Saharan desert area, or, and less likely, represents 
independent post-glacial (re-)colonisation by the many and varied Macaronesian floral 
elements. All potentially are highly dispersible given the small size of their diaspores. 


Alpi Apuane, Italy 

Trichomanes speciosum was found, new to the Italian flora, only as recently as 1976 
(Ferrarini, 1977). Subsequently a total of five “populations” have been detected 
growing within the stream gorge of the Valle de Serra and its side valleys, close to the 
town of Serravezza (Marchetti, in Ferrarini et al., 1986). Few discrete individual mature 


210 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 205-215. 2005 


Table 1. Distribution of multilocus phenotypes (MLPs) in southern Spanish 
Trichomanes speciosum populations (figures represent the number of apparently 
discrete individuals possessing that MLP). 


Allozyme Phenotype Site 


IDH | 6-PGD| MDH | Miel | Ojén 1 | Ojén 2 | Ojén 3 | Ojén 4 sina 
-cocne 


Z 


O 
= 


> 


og too 4 (Ml of ne 3) Fa > fo] oo a OO 
bo 
No 
Ww 
A ee = | 


wl) wl] ml] wm] wm} Pm] PS] SY] SY] SE] YP] PS S| S| CY CF 
Co] we me) me] el yO me Om Oe Oe Oe 
>| A] DW] Wl S| wl] Se] UO] WW] wD] W| BD! S| | & 


| _ 


sporophytes are known but at least one is extensive and regularly highly fertile. The 
known sporophytes share a distinctive and apparently unique morphology. 

Initial researches indicate a wider distribution of the gametophyte (Rumsey & 
Vogel, unpubl.), perhaps paralleling that of another disjunct Atlantic element, the 
filmy-fern Hymenophyllum tunbrigense, for which ca. 70 sites are known in the 
communes of Massa, Montignoso, Stazzema, Pietrasanta, as well as Serravezza 
(Pichi-Sermolli, 1936; Marchetti, 1992). Sporophytic recruitment has been observed in 
sites containing mature sporophytes but not in sites currently only known to support 
gametophyte populations. 

Unfortunately only a limited range of material has been available for analysis. Both 
localities from which multiple samples have been taken support more than one MLP (3 

) with patterns consistent with the occurrence of intergametophytic mating. 


RUMSEY et al.: REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN T. SPECIOSUM 211 


Sporophytes are currently unknown in the most genetically diverse of these sites. One 
allele in the enzyme PGM has not to date been recovered in any other Trichomanes 
speciosum population throughout its global range. 

All the evidence would thus tend to argue that this area must be considered refugial. 


Southwest Scotland 

In contrast to the Iberian and Italian sites this area was heavily glaciated and the species 
occurrence here must result from post-glacial (re-) colonization. It is thus instructive to 
compare the patterns of distribution and extent of genetic variation with the almost 
certainly refugial areas above and more equivocal areas. 

Fewer than 20 discrete sporophyte plants have been detected in Scotland since its 
first discovery in 1863 (Babington, 1863) and less than half this number are known to 
be extant. Only one of these colonies has ever been seen to produce spores and most 
are, or were, very limited in size and extent. However, the gametophyte generation is 
widespread and may be locally abundant. Recent recruitment of sporophytes has been 
seen to occur both in sites containing mature sporophytes and also in at least one site 
were these were absent. 

Genetic diversity of the species at this the northern-most limit of its distribution was 
studied by Rumsey et al., (1999). 121 samples from 37 populations in 22 sites were 
examined and 7 allozyme MLPs were detected. Two of these MLPs covered large areas 
(>30 km in total extent), while the others were restricted to one, or rarely few, localities. 
No site was found to contain more than one MLP. Whether this is evidence for blocking 
of available niches by the first arrival, or merely a reflection of the extreme rarity of 
propagules of other MLPs arriving in occupied sites is unclear and may require 
experimental verification through deliberate introduction. The extent of MLPs was not 
correlated with presence /absence of sporophytes. Where they extend over many 
kilometres, in some cases on separate islands, the only credible means of dispersal is by 
spore. Where sporophytes are currently unknown such a distribution indicates their past 
presence, and a greater fertility than in the recorded past. Sporophytes may have 
occurred as long ago as in the sub-atlantic period, or during brief warm/wet phases 
subsequently — such as we appear to be experiencing currently. Very broad distributions 
must indicate considerable age given the poor dispersal powers shown by both 
generations of this organism. It is tempting to speculate that geographical extent could 
be correlated with arrival time but many conflicting factors have also to be considered. 

Communities in glaciated and un-glaciated areas share many rare and disjunct taxa 
and their presence alone is un-informative as to refugial status, but the population 
structure and genetic make-up of these taxa is much more revealing. Many of the 
Macaronesian bryophytic taxa show disjunctions to southwest Scotland, but the 
majority of these diocious species are represented by one sex alone in the British Isles, 
yet exist in mixed sex populations and fruit in southern (refugial?) areas. Such a pattern 
might be expected given extremely rare long-range post-glacial dispersal events to the 
nort 


Central Europe 

Rumsey er al., (1998) examined allozymic diversity in 35 sites from the then 
easternmost known extent of the species distribution in the Elbsandsteingebirge on the 
Czech- German border, through Germany to the French border in the northern Vosges 
mountains. The extensive distribution of some MLPs, as in Scotland, indicated that 


212 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 205-215. 2005 


sporophytes almost certainly must have been present in the past. The majority of sites 
supported single MLPs ; however some sites in the pfalzerwald supported multiple 
MLPs, some of which are indicative of past inter-gametophytic mating and thus by 
inference sporophyte production. From the allozyme data alone Rumsey ef al., (1998) 
suggested that post-glacial spread was more likely but were unable to exclude the 
possibility that some at least of these locations may have acted as refugia for the 
species. The levels of intra-population variation, even though low, and the presence of 
unique simple banding patterns for two enzyme systems (ACON, 6-PGD), gave support 
to this notion but the proximity of glacial forelands to many of the current localities 
suggested survival was less likely (Vogel ef al., 1993). Subsequent work by Rumsey ef 
al. (in prep.), sequencing of the chloroplast DNA haplotypes first reported by Rumsey 
et al. (1996) has provided additional evidence which would appear to strengthen the 
case for, at least limited, peri-glacial survival. Macaronesian island refugia show a 
major dichotomy between the Azores in the north, and Madeira and the Canaries to the 
south. Minor haplotype variants link some Canarian populations with those from 
southern Iberia, supporting the broad floristic links already known. Investigated areas 
of Europe on the western Atlantic seaboard from Brittany northwards show a mix of the 
haplotypic variants found in the southern refugial sites, although not an intimate one 
(i.e. sites contain single haplotypes in all cases). The overall picture created is in 
contrast with the usual pattern of Northern Purity — Southern Richness reported by 
Hewitt (1999) and others. Interestingly, central Europe is uniformly of the Azorean, 
believed to be ancestral, type, in spite of the fact that all of the nearest spore sources 
(Spain, Italy) are of the contrasting major haplotype. If the distribution were the result 
of post-glacial immigration one might expect a similar pattern to that shown in 
northwest Europe, with all of the refugia and particularly the most proximal to be 
involved. Unique minor variants also exist within central Europe, for example in 
Luxembourg, where they cover an extensive area indicative of a long period of 
occupation and/or past sporophyte presence. Extremely severe conditions in proximity 
to sites and the growth and reproductive strategies of Trichomanes speciosum may 
explain the lack of expected diversity in these putatively refugial areas. 


REFERENCES 

ANON. 1979. The Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural 
Habitats. Strasbourg, Council of Europe. 

ANON. 1992. Council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 On the conservation of 
natural habitats and of wild faunas and floras. Official Journal of the European 
Communities 206: 7-49. 

BABINGTON, C. C. 1863. Trichomanes radicans. J. Bot. (London) |: 293-4. 

BENNERT, H. W., JAGER, W., LEONHARDS, W., RASBACH, H. & RASBACH, K. 
1994 Prothallien des Hautfarns Trichomanes speciosum (Hymenophyllaceae) auch 
in Nordrhein- Westfalen. Flor. Rundbr. 28: 80. 

BOUDRIE, M. 2001, Premiére découverte de gametophytes de Trichomanes speciosum 
Willd. (Hymenophyllaceae, Pteridophyta) dans le Massif Central francais. Bull. 
Soc. Bot. du Centre-OQuest 32: 73-78. 

BUJNOCH, W. & KOTTKE, U. 1994. Der Gametophyt von Trichomanes speciosum 
Willd. im Regierungsbezirk Trier. Dendrocopos 21: 225-230. 

DRUDE, O. 1902. Der Hercynische Florenbezirk. (Die Vegetation der Erde Bd. V1). W. 
Engelmann, Leipzig. 


RUMSEY et al.: REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN T. SPECIOSUM 213 


DRUERY, C. T. 1910. British ferns and their variations. George Routledge & Sons, 
Londo 


n. 

FARRAR, D. R. 1967. Gametophytes of four tropical fern genera reproducing 
independently of their sporophytes in the southern Appalachians. Science 155: 
1266-1267. 

FARRAR, D. R. 1985. Independent fern gametophytes in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 
86B: 361-369. 

FARRAR, D. R. 1992. Trichomanes intricatum: the independent Trichomanes 
gametophyte in the Eastern United States. Amer. Fern J. 82: 68-74. 

FARRAR, D. R. 1993. Hymenophyllaceae in: Morin, N.R. ef al., eds. Flora of North 
America Vol.2. Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms, pp. 190-197. Oxford University 
Press, New York. 

FERRARINI, E. 1977. Un antico relitto atlantico ai piedi delle alpi Apuane: 
Trichomanes speciosum Willd., entita nuova per la flora italiana. Giorn. Bot. Ital. 
LT: b7ieiy 7. 

FERRARINI, E., CIAMPOLINI, F., PICHI SERMOLLI, R.E.G. & MARCHETTI, D. 
1986. Iconographia Palynologica Pteridophytorum Italiae. Webbia 40: 1-202. 

GARRIDO DIAZ, B. & HIDALGO MAQUEDA, R. 1998. Nueva localidad de 
Vandenboschia speciosa (Willd.) Kunkel. Acta Bot. Malacit. 23: 229-232. 

HORN, K. & ELSNER, O. 1997. Neufunde von Gametophyten des Hautfarns 
Trichomanes speciosum Willd. (Hymenophyllaceae) in Unter- und Oberfranken. 
Ber. Naturf. Ges. Bamberg 71: 53-68. 

HUCK, S. 1997. Die Prothallien des Hautfarns Trichomanes speciosum Willd. 
(Hymenophyllaceae) in Hessen. Hess. Flor. Briefe. 46: 28-30. 

KIRSCH, H. & BENNERT, H. W. 1996. Erstnachweis von Gametophyten des 
Hautfarns Trichomanes speciosum Willd. (Hymenophyllaceae) in Bayern. Nachr. 
Naturwisss. Mus. Aschaffenburg 103: 119-133. 

KLEIN, E. J. 1926. Hymenophyllum tunbrigense (L.) Sm., das Juwel des 
Begone Sandsteins. Cahiers Luxembourgeois |: 3-33; 2: 97-125. 

KOTTKE, U. 2003. Die Verbreitung der Gametophyten des Hautfarns 7richomanes 
speciosum (Hymenophyllaceae) im  siidlichen Rheinischen Schieferbirge. 
Dendrocopos 30: 169-174. 

KRIPPEL, Y. 2001. Aire de repartition et statut de Trichomanes speciosum Willd. 
(Hymenophyllaceae) au Luxembourg. Bull. Soc. Nat. luxemb. 102: 3-13. 

LORIOT, S., BLANCHARD, F., LAMOTTE, T. & COTTIGNIES, A. 2002. Présence 
du gametophyte independent de Trichomanes speciosum — Willd. 
(Hymenophyllaceae, Pteridophyta) dans les vallées du Pays Basque. Premieres 
données concernabnt sa distribution dans les Pyrénées-Atlantiques. Le Monde des 
Plantes 477: 23. 

MANTON, I. 1950. Problems in cytology and evolution in the Pteridophyta. 
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 

MARCHETTI, D. 1992. Le pteridofite indigene della regione apuana. Mem. Accad. 
Lunig. Sci. 60-61: 419-420. 

MOLESWORTH-ALLEN, B. 1977. Observations on some rare Spanish ferns in Cadiz 
province, Spain. Fern Gaz. 11: 271-275. 

PICHI-SERMOLLI, R. 1936. Sulla presenza nel Monte Pisano dell’ Hymenophyllum 
tunbrigense Smith. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. 43: 764-768. 

REICHLING, L. 1997. Trichomanes speciosum Willd., un mystérieux passager 


214 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 205-215. 2005 


clandestine. Adoxa 15-6: 1-4. 

RASBACH, H., RASBACH, K. & JEROME, C. 1993. Uber das Vorkommen des 
Hautfarns Trichomanes speciosum (Hymenophyllaceae) in den Vogesen 
(Frankreich) und dem benachbarten Deutschland. Carolinea 51: 51-52. 

RATCLIFFE, D. A. 1968. An ecological account of Atlantic bryophytes in the British 
Isles. New Phytol. 67: 231-247. 

RATCLIFFE, D. A., BIRKS, H. J. B. & BIRKS, H. H. 1993. The ecology and 
conservation of the Killarney fern Trichomanes speciosum Willd. in Britain and 
Ireland. Biol. Cons. 66: 231-247. 

RICHARDS, P. W. 1934. Trichomanes radicans Sw. in the south of Spain. J. Bot. 
(London) 72: 351. 

RICHARDS, P. W. & EVANS, G. B. 1972. Biological Flora of the British Isles: 
Hymenophyllum.. J. Ecol. 60: 245- 268. 

RUMSEY, F. J. 1994. The distribution, ecology and population biology of the Killarney 
fern Trichomanes speciosum Willd. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of 
Manchester, England. 

RUMSEY, F. J., HEADLEY, A. D., FARRAR, D. R. & SHEFFIELD, E. 1991. The 
Killarney Fern (Trichomanes speciosum) in Yorkshire. Naturalist 116: 41-43. 

RUMSEY, F. J., JERMY, A. C. & SHEFFIELD, E. 1998. The independent 
gametophytic stage of Trichomanes speciosum Willd. (Hymenophyllaceae), the 
Killarney Fern, and its distribution in the British Isles. Watsonia 22: 1-19. 

RUMSEY, F. J., RAINE, C. A. & SHEFFIELD, E. 1992. The reproductive capability of 
‘independent’ Trichomanes gametophytes. In IDE, J. M., JERMY, A. C. & PAUL, 
A. M., (eds.) Fern a Past, Present and Future Objectives, pp.299- 304. 
Intercept, Andov 

RUMSEY, F. J, RUSSELL, S. J., JI, J.. BARRETT, J. A. & GIBBY, M. 1996. Genetic 
variation in the endangered filmy fern Trichomanes speciosum Willd. In Camus, J. 
M., Gibby, M. and Johns, R. J., (eds.) Pteridology in Perspective, pp.161-165. Royal 
Botanic Gardens, Kew. 

RUMSEY, F. J., SHEFFIELD, E. & FARRAR, D.R. 1990. British filmy-fern 
gametophytes. Pteridol. 2: 40-42. 

RUMSEY, F. J. & SHEFFIELD, E. 1996. Inter-generational ecological niche separation 
and the "independent gametophyte" phenomenon. In Camus, J. M., Gibby, M. and 
Johns, R. J., (eds.) Pteridology in Perspective, pp.563-570. Royal Botanic Gardens, 
Kew . 

RUMSEY, FJ. & VOGEL, J.C. (1998) Trichomanes speciosum willd. 
(Hymenophyllaceae) in southern Spain. Fern Gaz. 15: 197-203. 

RUMSEY, F.J., VOGEL, J.C., RUSSELL, S.J., BARRETT, J.A. & GIBBY, M. 1998. 
Climate, colonisation and celibacy: population structure in Central European 
Trichomanes speciosum (Pteridophyta). Botanica Acta 111; 481-489. 

RUMSEY, F. J. & VOGEL, J. C. 1999. Tetrastichium fontanum (Mitt.) Card. new to 
mainland Europe. J. Bryol. 21: 72-73. 

RUMSEY, F. J., VOGEL, J. C., RUSSELL, S. J., BARRETT, J. A. & GIBBY, M. 1999. 
Population structure and conservation biology of the endangered fern Trichomanes 
speciosum Willd. (Hymenophyllaceae) at its northern distributional limit. Biol. J. 
Linn. Soc. 66 333-344. 

“SENTINEL” 2003. Killarney fern conservation. Pteridologist 4: 58-61. 

TUTIN, T. G, BURGES, N. A., CHATER, A. O., EDMONDSON, J. R., HEYWOOD, 


RUMSEY et al.: REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN T. SPECIOSUM 215 


V. H., MOORE, D. M., VALENTINE, D. H., WALTERS, S. M. & WEBB, D. A. 
1993. Flora Europaea Vol. 1, 2nd. Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 
VOGEL, J. C., JESSEN, S., GIBBY, M., JERMY, A. C. & ELLIS, L. 1993. 
Gametophytes of 7richomanes speciosum (Hymenophyllaceae: Pteridophyta) in 
Central Europe. Fern Gaz. 14: 227-232. 

WAGNER, W. H. JR. & EVERS, R.A. 1963. Sterile prothallial clones (7richomanes) 
locally abundant on IIlinois sandstones. Amer. J. Bot. 50: 623 


216 FERN GAZ. 17(4). 2005 


PTERIDOPHYTE DIVERSITY IN LUXEMBOURG 
Y. KRIPPEL 


Research associate of the Natural History Museum of Luxembourg 
Rue de Rollingen, 18A; L - 7475 Schoos, Luxembourg 
(Email: yves.krippel@mnhn.lu) 


The Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg is internationally known for its small relictual 
population of Tunbridge filmy-fern (Hymenophyllum tunbrigense (L.) Sm.), first 
discovered here in 1821. In recent decades, however, ferns and allied plants - especially 
subspecies and hybrids - have often been neglected by botanists in Luxembourg, so that 
reliable data about distribution and status of pteridophyte species is often lacking. Over 
the last few years, the study of the pteridophytes of Luxembourg has been relaunched, 
and previous deficiencies in information are being reduced progressively. 

Despite the small geographic area of Luxembourg (2586 km’), the diversity of 
pteridophytes is remarkable. A great number of geological substrates, special 
geomorphological features with particular microclimatic conditions and a great variety 
of habitats, ranging from acidic to rather base-rich, have favoured the luxuriant 
development of a certain number of ferns and fern allies. Not less than 57 pteridophytes 
(species, subspecies, nothosubspecies and hybrids) are known for Luxembourg. 
Regrettably a certain number of species have not been observed in the recent decades 
and can be considered as extinct in wild. Fortunately new taxa have been discovered 
recently, such as Trichomanes speciosum Willd. (gametophytes), Asp/lenium 
trichomanes L. subsp. pachyrachis (Christ) Lovis & Reichstein, Asplenium 
trichomanes L. nothossp. staufferi Lovis & Reichstein, Asplenium x murbekii Dorfler 
and Equisetum x litorale Kiihl. ex Rupr. At present the pteridophyte flora of 
Luxembourg includes five clubmosses, seven horsetails and 45 ferns. The Red List, 
based on the checklist of the pteridophytes of Luxembourg, applies the revised IUCN 
Red List categories (IUCN 2001) at a national level. Currently 14.7% of the taxa fall in 
the category Regionally Extinct (RE), 6.5% are Critically Endangered (CR), 6.5% 
Endangered (EN), 8.2% Vulnerable (VU) and 18% Extremely Rare (R). Only c. 40% of 
all pteridophyte taxa are considered not to be threatened (*) for Luxembourg. 

Despite the recent discoveries of new taxa, the pteridophyte flora of Luxembourg 
has experienced a significant loss of species. This is predominantly due to habitat 
changes and resulting climatic variations (habitat destruction, deforestation, changes in 
drainage patterns etc.). Management plans for rare and endangered species may prevent 
further loss. For critical species and extremely threatened sites, however, it is advisable 
to envisage securing the collection through ex-situ conservation and storage of 
representative samples for future scientific purposes. 


REFERENCES 
IUCN 2001. - IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species 
Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ii + 30 pp. 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 217-222. 2005 217 


SOME NOTES ON THE TAXONOMY, BIOGEOGRAPHY AND 
ECOLOGY OF DANAEA (MARATTIACEAE) 


M.J.M. CHRISTENHUSZ' & H. TUOMISTO?’ 


Department of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland, 
(Email: 'maarten.christenhusz@utu.fi, *hanna.tuomisto@utu.fi) 


Key words: Biogeography, Danaea, ecology, Marattiaceae, Neotropics, phylogeny, 
taxonomy. 


ABSTRACT 

The neotropical genus Danaea is in revision and some notes on the genus are 
presented here. We find that the genus can be divided into three subgroups, 
based on morphological characters of the rhizome, stipe articulation and pinna 
margin serration. The tree groups are discussed and some taxonomic issues are 
addressed. The occurrence of bipinnate D. nodosa is reported from Jamaica, and 
trifoliate specimens of D. simplicifolia are reported from French Guiana. The 
identities of D. alata, D. jamaicensis, D. jenmanii, D. mazeana, D. media, D. 
nodosa, D. trifoliata and D. ulei and their synonyms are discussed. Further 
studies on the phylogeny, taxonomy and ecology of Danaea are needed. 


INTRODUCTION 

The genus Danaea Sm. is one of the few genera of ferns confined to the Western 
Hemisphere. It has been repeatedly observed that species limits within the genus are 
poorly understood, and that the genus is in great need of monographic study (e.g., 
Morton, 1951, Kramer, 1978). De Vriese & Harting (1853) monographed the 
Marattiaceae but excluded Danaea, which was at the time, placed in a separate family: 
the Danaeaceae. Underwood (1902) revised the North American species, and the 
Ecuadorian species were recently revised by Tuomisto and Moran (2001), but many 
taxonomic problems remain. In the recent monograph by Rolleri (2004) a large degree 
of synonymization was suggested, with which we do not agree. 

In recent years, it has become obvious that information on characters such as plant 
habit, rhizome morphology and leaf colour are useful, and often necessary, in 
identifying Danaea specimens to the correct species (Tuomisto & Moran, 2001). 
Unfortunately, characters like habit and colour are not easily preserved through the 
process of pressing and drying, which complicates the identification of herbarium 
specimens of Danaea. Furthermore, the rhizome is cumbersome to collect and difficult 
to divide between several duplicates. Collecting the rhizome kills the plant in any case. 
Consequently, many herbarium specimens, especially those of the larger species, do not 
include enough rhizome to allow reconstructing its morphology. Especially historical 
specimens, many of which are types, do not include sufficient information about these 
characters, either on the specimen itself or on the accompanying label. This has made 
it difficult to establish the identity of various species with certainty. 

To solve this problem, we have carried out field work in different parts of the 
neotropics. As many type localities as possible were visited to establish the identity of 
the type specimens. Observing the populations in the field also yields information about 
the natural variation in morphological characters, and hence helps in circumscribing the 


218 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 217-222. 2005 


species. So far, field work has been carried out in Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, 
French Guiana, Jamaica, Peru, Puerto Rico, Suriname and the Lesser Antilles. Future 
phylogenetic and systematic studies will hopefully give a greater insight in the diversity 
and relationships between the species of Danaea. 


DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF DANAEA 
Danaea occurs solely in the New World tropics. It can be found from Mexico, through 
all of Central and South America, south to Bolivia. It also occurs on all Greater Antilles, 
and the wetter, higher islands of the Lesser Antilles. There are isolated populations in 
Atlantic south-eastern Brazil, southern Paraguay and Cocos Island (Costa Rica). The 
biogeographical patterns of Danaea are presently being studied. 

Danaea occurs mainly in permanently wet forests on well drained soils. Several 
species seem to prefer steep slopes or creek banks. Danaea is mostly found in 
undisturbed rainforests, although some species tolerate disturbance, and some species 
even seem to favour recently disturbed places like shady wet roadside banks. Danaea 
species can be found in lowland rainforests, up to an elevation of about 2000 m in 
montane cloud forest and elfin woodland, but most species are found between about 
300 and 1000 m elevation. In Amazonian lowland rain forests, it has been found that 
different species grow on soils with different nutrient status (Tuomisto & Poulsen 
1996). 


THE THREE MAJOR GROUPS IN DANAEA 
Based on morphological characters, we divide Danaea into three major groups. This 
division is still tentative, as the groups overlap in some of the characters, and some 
species cannot be unambiguously allocated to a group. This division does not follow 
any of the sections proposed by Presl (1845), and the phylogenetic relationships 
between the species are not yet known although they are being studied. 

The first group consists of species that resemble Danaea nodosa and are often 
identified as such in herbaria. These are large-statured species whose adults often 
exceed 1.5 m in height. Most species are characterized by a creeping rhizome (except 
D. erecta Tuomisto & R.C.Moran), the absence of nodes on the stipes (except D. media 
Liebm.), and the presence of dentations at pinna apices (except D. erecta and D. 
grandifolia Underw.). 

The second group consists of species supposedly related to Danaea leprieurit 
Kunze. This group of species has previously been united under the name D. elliptica 
(see below). These are species of intermediate stature, 0.4-1.5 m in height. This group 
is characterized by erect, radially symmetric rhizomes, stipes articulated with swollen 
nodes (nodes sometimes lacking in D. bipinnata Tuomisto) and entire pinna apices. The 
apical pinna is always present, never replaced by an apical bud. 

The third group consists of species resembling Danaea alata Sm, D. moritziana 
C.Presl and D. mazeana Underw.. These are species of small to intermediate stature, 
0.1-1.5 m in height, and are characterized by radially symmetric (rarely dorsiventral) 
rhizomes that can be erect, creeping or ascending. The stipes are nodose, the blade 
usually bares many crowded pinnae, and the pinna apices are (coarsely) serrate. Some 
of the smaller species have translucent pinnae (D. trichomanoides T.Moore ex Spruce, 
D. imbricata Tuomisto & R.C.Moran, D. tenera C.V.Morton), and many species have 
bicolorous fronds, with the abaxial side pale green or whitish. The apical pinna can be 
replaced by a proliferous bud, but this does not seem to be a distinguishing feature 


CHRISTENHUSZ & TUOMISTO: SOME NOTES ON DANAEA Pah 


between species. To distinguish species within this group, Underwood used mostly 
characters of the venation, which is, in most cases, also highly variable. 


Notes on the Danaea nodosa group 

Danaea nodosa, the type species of the genus, has always been considered to be 
widespread, occurring throughout the range of the genus. However, recent field studies 
and close study of herbarium material have revealed, that the name has been applied to 
several clearly separate species. Often these species have different ecological 
preferences. 

The lectotype of Danaea nodosa is a plate in Plumier (1705), which is based on 
material either collected “between Morne Rouge and Saint Pierre, Martinique” or ‘‘Port- 
de-Paix, Haiti’. The latter locality was selected as the type locality by Underwood 
(1909). This was a fortunate choice, because the material we have seen from Haiti 
agrees with the type illustration very well: the plants have slender, dorsiventral 
rhizomes with two rows of leaf scars, and the pinnae are long and parallel-sided. In 
contrast, the plants that grow on Martinique do not match the type illustration: they 
have very bulky rhizomes with fronds arranged in several rows, and their pinnae are 
narrower and more tapering. It is obvious that the populations on the two islands 
represent two different species (Christenhusz, in press). 

In Jamaica, most of the plants we have seen agree very well with the material from 
Haiti, and can thus be considered true Danaea nodosa. However, we found that leaf 
dissection in Jamaican plants varied from the normal once pinnate to fully bipinnate 
(Christenhusz & Tuomisto 3194 (IJ, TUR, UCWI). In some populations, the tendency 
to bipinnate fronds was stronger than in others, but in all populations where bipinnate 
fronds were found, once pinnate fronds were also present. No other differences were 
found between the once and twice pinnate fronds than the degree of leaf dissection. It 
seems obvious, therefore, that this is a case of within-species variation. An interesting 
question concerns the identity of the South American material. We have observed some 
differences in pinna shape between the Jamaican and South American populations, but 
their rhizomes and habit are similar. Even though we have never observed any tendency 
towards bipinnate leaf dissection in any South American population, for the time being 
we consider these as D. nodosa. 

Field work in Western Amazonia has shown that Danaea nodosa grows on relatively 
nutrient-rich, clayey soils. Its juveniles have simple fronds only when very small, and 
the fronds become pinnate usually when they are still less than 10 cm long. A very 
similar plant but with cartilaginous pinna margins has been found on poorer. more 
loamy soils. This species has larger pinnae, especially at the juvenile stage when fronds 
often remain simple until they exceed 30 cm in length (Tuomisto & Groot, 1995, 
Tuomisto & Moran, 2001). On the basis of a photograph of one of the isotypes, the 
latter species was identified as D. u/ei H.Christ. Unfortunately, other isotypes of D. ulei 
show clearly that the rhizomes in this species are erect, indicating that it belongs to the 
D. leprieurii group. Its pinna margins are not cartilaginous, either. Consequently, the 
poor-soil segregate of D. nodosa needs a new name (Christenhusz & Tuomisto, in 
press). 

In Costa Rica, populations of supposed Danaea nodosa were found to be variable 
in whether the stipe is nodose or not. Juveniles usually had one or two nodes, but older 
fronds more often had none. The presence of nodes was variable even in fronds on the 
same rhizome, which shows that the two forms belong to the same species. These plants 


220 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 217-222. 2005 


have previously been identified either as D. nodosa or as D. elliptica, depending on 
whether nodes were present or not, as this has traditionally been the most important 
diagnostic character between the two species. Since true D. nodosa never has nodes, the 
names that can be applied to this species are D. media Liebm. and D. elata Liebm. 
Danaea media was described on the basis of small plants (with nodes) and D. e/ata on 
the basis of a large specimen (without nodes) from the same population in Mexico. 
These names have earlier been synonymized with D. elliptica and D. nodosa, 
respectively, but our observations indicate that they represent another taxon worthy of 
recognition at species level. We propose that the name D. media is used as the valid 
name for this species, because this epithet refers to the species having intermediate 
characters between the D. nodosa and D. leprieurii groups. 


Notes on the Danaea leprieurii group 

Most of the species in this group have at some stage been identified as Danaea elliptica 
Sm. in Rees, which has been considered a wide-spread and common species. The 
identity and typification of D. elliptica has however long been in turmoil. The lectotype 
designated by Proctor (1977) is: Jamaica, Mount Diablo, Herb. Sloane 1: 85 (BM-SL). 
It has been observed repeatedly that this specimen is actually a juvenile of D. nodosa 
(L.) Sm (e.g., Lellinger 2000, Tuomisto & Moran 2001). We have confirmed this by 
visiting Mount Diablo, where we only found individuals of D. nodosa. The issue of the 
synonymization of D. elliptica is discussed in more detail in Christenhusz & Tuomisto 
(in press). 

As mentioned above, Underwood selected Haiti rather than Martinique as the type 
locality of Danaea nodosa. \t is worth mentioning that since the two islands have 
different species of the D. nodosa group, the situation would now be very different had 
Underwood selected the other way round. If Martinique were the type locality, D. 
nodosa would be represented by a type illustration that matches the species occurring 
on that island rather poorly, and D. elliptica would become the valid name for the 
species that has so far been known as D. nodosa in the Greater Antilles and South 
America, which would be very confusing. 

Due to the problems with the name D. elliptica, we call the present group of species 
the D. leprieurii group, as this is one of the oldest accepted names in this group. This 
group includes many apparently closely related species that are morphologically quite 
similar, but grow on different soil types and/or altitudes. 

Danaea leprieurii was described from French Guiana, but recently also material 
from western Amazonia has been allocated to this species. (Tuomisto & Moran 2001). 
In western Amazonia, D. leprieurii grows on relatively poor substrates, whereas the 
recently described and morphologically rather similar D. bipinnata grows on richer 
soils. The two can be distinguished by size (D. /eprieurii is smaller), the number of 
nodes on the stipes (2-3 in D. leprieurii, 0-1 in D. bipinnata), and usually the degree of 
lamina dissection. Danaea bipinnata was described from lowland Amazonia, but it is 
very similar to D. elliptica Sm. var. crispula Rosenst, which was described from lower 
montane elevations in the Peruvian Andes. However, D. elliptica var. crispula is never 
bipinnate, and it is usually larger than D. bipinnata. 

Danaea simplicifolia Rudge is confined to the Guiana shield, and can easily be 
recognized by its simple fronds. The only other species with simple fronds is D. 
carillensis H.Christ, an endemic of Costa Rica, with a nodose stipe, creeping rhizome 
and apical dentations, and therefore belonging to the D. alata group. D. simplicifolia 


CHRISTENHUSZ & TUOMISTO: SOME NOTES ON DANAEA #21 


only has a single node below its simple blade. From this node, sometimes one or two 
lateral pinnae are produced (French Guiana: Christenhusz 2325 (CAY, TUR), 
Christenhusz 2415 (CAY, TUR)). It then resembles D. trifoliata Rchb., a species that 
can be distinguished by its nodose stipe. Another character that distinguishes D. 
simplicifolia from juvenile Danaea that have not developed lateral pinnae yet, are the 
white abaxial surfaces of the blades, an uncommon feature in this group. It is only found 
in some representatives of the D. alata group and in the Ecuadorian D. bicolor 
Tuomisto & R.C.Moran. 


Notes on the Danaea alata group 

Danaea alata Sm. is a species confined to the Lesser Antilles (lectotype from 
Martinique, Plumier 1705). It is recognized by simple, widely spaced veins, nodose 
stipes, creeping, radial rhizomes and coarse apical dentations. Its synonyms are D. 
fendleri Underw. (Trinidad) and D. stenophylla Kunze (Guadeloupe). 

At a first glance the closely related Danaea mazeana Underw. appears to be 
confined to Guadeloupe, but material from other Antilles is very variable. D. mazeana 
fits well within the variation of D. jamaicensis Underw., and cannot be consistently 
separated from it. However, D. jamaicensis sometimes has apical proliferations, which 
are never found in D. mazeana. This might be due to possible hybridization with D. 
jenmanii Underw. on Jamaica. D. mazeana differs in ecology from D. alata, as the 
former is confined to cloud forests above 600 m, whereas the latter is found only in 
rainforests at lower altitudes. 

On present evidence, Danaea jenmanii and D. wrightii Underw. are conspecific. 
The type of D. wrightii is somewhat scalier, but all other characters overlap. Field work 
in Jamaica showed that the scalyness of D. jenmanii is variable. Because D. jenmanii 
has been applied more widely than D. wrightii, the first is proposed here for 
conservation over the latter. Both species were described in the same publication. 


CONCLUSIONS 

Field work and herbarium studies have shown that the diversity of Danaea is much 
greater than previously assumed. The first indication of this tendency was the 
Ecuadorian treatment (Tuomisto and Moran 2001) where 18 species were included, 
eight of which were described as new. The same tendency is continuing in other areas, 
and we now have several species in publication (Christenhusz, in press; Christenhusz 
& Tuomisto, in press). It seems obvious that the concepts of the geographical 
distribution ranges of the species will have to be changed once the taxonomy of the 
genus has been sorted out. More species than expected seem to have rather narrow 
ranges. 


REFERENCES 

CHRISTENHUSZ, M.J.M. in press. Three new species of Danaea (Marattiaceae) from 
French Guiana and the Lesser Antilles. Ann. Bot. Fennici. 

CHRISTENHUSZ, M.J.M. & TUOMISTO, H. in press. Five new species of Danaea 
(Marattiaceae) from Peru and a new status for D. elliptica. Kew Bulletin. 

KRAMER, K.U. 1978. The Pteridophytes of Suriname, an enumeration with keys of the 
ferns and fern-allies. Uitgaven “Natuurwetenschappelijke studiekring voor 
Suriname en de Nederlandse Antillen” 93:17-18, Utrecht. 

LELLINGER, D.B. 2000. On the lectotypification of Danaea elliptica. Amer. Fern J. 


poe FERN GAZ. 17(4): 217-222. 2005 


90(3): 100-103 

MORTON, C.V. 1951. A new fern of the genus Danaea from Colombia. J. Wash. Acad. 
Sci. 41(8): 276. 

PLUMIER, C. 1705. Lingua cervina nodosa major. Traité des Fougéres de 
l’ Amériques, t. 108, page 90 

PRESL, C.B. 1845. Genera Filicacearum. Supplementum Tentaminis Pteridographiae: 
34-39. Praha. 

PROCTOR, GR. 1977. Marattiaceae. In: HOWARD, R.A. Flora of the Lesser Antilles, 
Leeward and Windward Islands, vol. 2, Pteridophyta: 45-49. Arnold Arboretum, 
Harvard University, Jamaica Plain, MA. 

ROLLERI, C.H. 2004. Revisién del Género Danaea (Marattiaceae-Pteridophyta). 
Darwiniana 42 (1-4): 217-301 

ROSENSTOCK, E. 1907. Beitrage zur Pteridophytenflora Siidbrasiliens. Hedwigia 46: 
162-164 

SMITH, IE. 1808. Danaea elliptica, in REES, Cycl. 11: Danaea No. 2. 

TUOMISTO, H. & GROOT, A. T. 1995. Identification of the juveniles of some ferns 
from western Amazonia. Amer. Fern J. 85(1): 1-28. 

TUOMISTO, H. & MORAN, R.C. 2001. Marattiaceae. In: HARLING, G & 
ANDERSON, L. (eds.) Fl. Ecuador 66: 23-68. 

TUOMISTO, H. & POULSEN, A. D. 1996. Influence of edaphic specialization on 
pteridophyte distribution in neotropical rain forests. Journal of Biogeography 23: 
283-293. 

UNDERWOOD, L.M. 1902. ens Ferns — V. A Review of the Genus Danaea. Bull. 
Torrey Bot. Club 29 (12): 669-679. 

UNDERWOOD, L.M. 1909. Family 1. Marattiaceae. In: BRITTON, N., MURRILL, W. 
& BARNHART, J. (eds.) N. Amer. Fl. 16 (1): 17-23. 

VRIESE, W.H. DE & HARTING, P. 1853. Monographie des Marattiacées. Noothoven 
van Goor, Leiden & Arnz, Diisseldorf. 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 223-234. 2005 223 


TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SPOROPHYTE FERTILITY IN 
DRYOPTERIS INTERMEDIA AND POLYSTICHUM ACROSTICHOIDES 
(DRYOPTERIDACEAE: PTERIDOPHYTA) 


J.M. SHARPE 
SHARPLEX Services, PO Box 499, Edgecomb, Maine 04556 USA 


Key words: annual variation, demography, fern, Dryopteris intermedia, crown fertility, 
plant fertility, growth, Polystichum acrostichoides, pteridophyte, temperate zone 


ABSTRACT 

A long-term demographic study to assess temporal variation in two common 
New England ferns, Dryopteris intermedia (Evergreen wood fern) and 
Polystichum acrostichoides (Christmas fern) focused on fertile leaf production 
by the reproductively mature sporophyte. Over an eight-year period only 29.9% 
of the leaves in a D. intermedia crown were fertile, while for P. acrostichoides 
significantly more (48.0%) of the leaves in the crown were fertile. Annual values 
of the percentage of plants with fertile leaves for D. intermedia ranged from 42% 
to 77% and for P. acrostichoides from 57% to 93% reflecting significant annual 
variation, possibly related to winter weather conditions. Only 16% of D. 
intermedia and 14% of P. acrostichoides sporophytes were fertile every year of 
the study. Transitions from fertile plant status to sterile plant status occurred in 
15% of the D. intermedia observations and 14% of the P acrostichoides 
observations. For both species, when a sterile year followed a fertile year the 
number of leaves in the crown decreased by approximately half a_ leaf. 
Determining the causes of such high levels of variability in plant fertility will be 
necessary before the role of ferns in any ecosystem can be fully understood. 


INTRODUCTION 

Long-term monitoring of marked individuals can provide insight into the life history of 
a species (Harper, 1977) as well as providing a solid basis for future experimental 
research (Noss, 1999). Werth & Cousens (1990) emphasized the importance of 
long-term studies of ferns in order to understand mortality and differential fitness, and 
noted that very little information is available on the life spans and generation times of 
ferns. There have been several short-term studies of the life history of sporophytes of 
specific temperate understory fern species. Field research on various aspects of the 
temperate fern life cycle has been reported for Blechnum spicant (L.) Smith (Cousens, 
1973, 1981), Thelypteris dentata (Forsskal) E. P. St. John, Woodwardia virginica (L.) 
Smith, Osmunda regalis L. (Bartsch & Lawrence, 1997) and Polystichum 
acrostichoides (Michaux) Schott (Greer & McCarthy, 2000). Studies exceeding 12 
years in length have been conducted on selected species of Botrychium (Montgomery, 
1990: Johnson-Groh, 1999). Sato (1990) followed leaf production for more than nine 
years in Polystichum braunii (Spenner) Fée, P. tripteron (Kunze) Pr.and Drvopteris 
crassirhizoma Nakai. Few other long-term studies have considered annual variation in 
temperate fern life history characteristics. 

Of the seven fern life history classes identified by Cousens ef al. (1988) the 
reproductively mature sporophyte class has the greatest impact on ecosystem processes. 
Spore production, controlled by the mature sporophyte, is a significant element of the 


224 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 223-234. 2005 


reproductive effort for ferns (Greer & McCarthy, 2000) and may also limit 
establishment of the next generation (Peck, 1980). Though few quantitative studies 
have addressed temporal variation in fertile leaf production it is assumed that most 
mature ferns reliably release spores every year (Sheffield 1996). Siman ef al. (1999) 
state that fertility is the rule for mature individuals of most ferns but note that the genus 
Pteridium is an exception. A few short-term studies have also noted variation from this 
generally accepted assumption. Cousens (1988) reported that marked adult fertile plants 
had been observed reverting to adult sterile plant status. This was based on a study of 
Woodwardia areolata (L.) T. Moore (= Lorinseria areolata (L.) C. Presl.) which lasted 
30 months (Cousens, ef al., 1988). Sato (1990) used counts of number of veins off the 
leaf midrib (NV) to assess chronological age. He observed a year-to year decrease in 
NV in about 20% of comparisons of overwintered leaves to the newly emerged leaf 
cohort in individuals of D. crassirhizoma and P. tripteron, but not in P. braunii. Greer 
& McCarthy (2000) found that not all reproductively mature individuals of P. 
acrostichoides produced at least one fertile leaf in each of the two years of their study. 

This exploratory study of the reproductively mature sporophyte of two temperate 
species was undertaken to extend our knowledge of annual variation in plant fertility in 
a long-term study lasting eight years. The goals were to 1) determine what percentage 
of the leaves produced by an individual each year were fertile, 2) assess the number of 
plants in a sample population that produced at least one fertile leaf from year to year, 3) 
examine levels of consistency in the annual sequence of fertile and sterile leaf 
production, 4) compare patterns of temporal variation for two different species, and 5) 
compare any observed temporal patterns to relatively short term local climate 
parameters. 


STUDY SPECIES 

Two temperate ferns common in northeastern forests of the USA were chosen for 
comparative study: Dryopteris intermedia (Willdenow) A. Gray, the Evergreen wood 
fern, and Polystichum acrostichoides, the Christmas fern. Leaves of D. intermedia are 
described as monomorphic by Montgomery & Wagner (1993) while those of P 
achrostichoides exhibit strong sterile-fertile leaf dimorphism, with the fertile leaf 
exhibiting a distinctive terminal segment of spore-bearing leaflets that are greatly 
reduced in size compared to the proximal sterile leaflets (Wagner, 1993). Both species 
have short internodes so that the leaves form a distinctly tufted crown around the shoot 
apex. 


MATERIALS AND METHODS 
Sporophyte fertility was observed over an eight-year period from 1993 to 2000 in a 
secondary, mixed-hardwood forest approximately 15 m above sea level in the town of 
Dresden, Lincoln County, Maine (USA) using methods developed for long-term studies 
of fern demography in a tropical forest at the Luquillo Long Term Ecological Research 
site in Puerto Rico (Sharpe, 1997). The sample population consisted of 31 individuals 
of D. intermedia and 14 individuals of P acrostichoides which were considered 
reproductively matures as they had produced spores at least once during the eight-year 
study period. Of those monitored, 24 individuals of D. intermedia and nine individuals 
of P. acrostichoides were fertile in 1993, the first year of the study. Each plant was 
identified by a numbered plastic stake and a small segment of colored, plastic-covered 
wire attached to a leaf base and transferred annually to one of the leaves in the next 


SHARPE: TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SPOROPHYTE FERTILITY 225 


year’s cohort of leaves. Annual observations of sporophytes were made during the last 
week in August to insure that all leaves had fully expanded. 

All leaves in the current year cohort were counted and each leaf was classified as 
sterile or fertile. To calculate a crown fertility perecentage for each sporophyte, the 
number of fertile leaves was compared to total number of leaves in the crown. 
Percentage of the plants fertile each year was determined by comparing the number of 
plants with at least one fertile leaf present in the crown to the total number of plants 
observed each year. Temporal patterns of fertile leaf production were further evaluated 
by noting the sequence of changes in plant fertility status, observed seven times within 
the eight-year monitoring period for each plant. Year-to-year transitions in plant fertility 
status were classified as FF (fertile to fertile), SS (sterile to sterile), FS (fertile to sterile) 
and SF (sterile to fertile). These categories are illustrated with an example of an 
individual plant which happened to experience all four types of plant fertility transitions 
(Figure 1). The number of continuous years a plant was sterile following and preceding 
a fertile year was also noted. 

In order to evaluate whether relatively short term weather patterns could have an 
effect on plant growth, values for mean daily minimum and maximum temperatures, 
precipitation and snowfall were taken from records of the NOAA weather station 
located within 100 km of the study site in Portland Maine. Climate data were analyzed 
separately for summer (May through October) and winter (November through April). 
These analyses did not show significant variation in mean daily summer temperatures 
and precipitation. However, winter temperatures had significantly lower mean daily 
minimums in 1994 and 1996. Snowfall was significantly higher in the winter of 1996. 
Furthermore, there was a major cyclic disturbance in the form of an ice storm in 
4 


INDIVIDUAL PLANT FERTILITY: DRYOPTERIS INTERMEDIA #17 


6 = 
| FERTILE LEAVES 
5 | M STERILE LEAVES | __ —— = 


> 
n 


NUMBER OF LEAVES 
No Ww 


1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 
YEAR 


Figure 1. Profile of the fertile and sterile leaves present in the crown of a sample 
individual (#17) of Drvopteris intermedia for each of the eight years the plant was 
monitored. Plant fertility status transitions are noted between bars (SS = Sterile Sterile, 
SF = Sterile/Fertile, FF ~ Fertile/Fertile, FS = Fertile/Sterile) for this sporophyte which 
happened to experience all four of the possible year-to-year transitions. 


226 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 223-234. 2005 


February 1998 (Darwin ef al., 2004). 

Data analysis 

Means and standard error of the means (SE) were calculated for crown fertility for each 
plant using data collected each year (N = 8). Standard error of the means were chosen 
to show variation because of the small sample sizes. All percentages were arcsine 
transformed before statistical tests were applied. To factor out variability among 
marked individuals, Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (RMA) was used to 
evaluate year-to-year differences in the percent of crown fertile. A one sample t-test was 
used to compare plant fertility and transition type percentages from year to year for each 
species. Paired t-tests were used to compare the different fertility characteristics for the 
two species. Data were analyzed using Statistix 8 (Analytical Software, 2003). 


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

Crown fertility 
In eight years of monitoring these populations, observations of crowns that were 
composed entirely of fertile leaves were unusual for both species. Of 360 individual 
annual flushes of leaves observed in this study, only eight individual leaf cohorts of 
Dryopteris intermedia and 18 of Polvstichum acrostichoides were completely fertile. 
Fewer than half the leaves produced by these reproductively mature plants were fertile 
and the mean percentage of leaves in the crown that were fertile is significantly lower 
for D. intermedia than for P. acrostichoides (Table 1). Neither species in this study 
approached 100% fertile leaf production. This could be a function of the chronological 
age of these plants, which is unknown. If they are all relatively young plants, perhaps 
the ability to produce a full cohort of fertile leaves had not yet occurred. If they are all 
relatively old plants, then possibly the ability to produce a full cohort of fertile leaves 
had been lost. Although no increasing or decreasing pattern can be seen by comparing 
the percentages from year to year, perhaps eight years is too small a segment of the total 
life span to observe such patterns. It is also possible that full fertile leaf production is 
not possible in the specific habitat where these plants were growing. It is possible that 
each species has an intrinsic limit on fertile leaf production by reproductively mature 
plants which integrates its habitat requirements and need for vegetative support tissue. 
While there are reports of high percentages of crown fertility in some temperate ferns, 
for example in Leptopteris hvmenophylloides (Sussex, 1958), low crown fertility has 
also been observed in Matteuccia ol si (Von Aderkas & Green, 1986). In a 
study undertaken in southern eria, Gureyeva (2001) found that environmental 
factors may severely limit spore nigra ae by ferns and Cousens (1973) noted 
population differences in fertile leaf production by Blechnum spicant. 

There were year-to-year differences in crown fertility. The annual mean percentage 
of leaves that were fertile within the crown ranged from 21.9% to 38.9% for D. 
intermedia and from 37.6% to 60.6% for P. acrostichoides with little concordance 
between species in the pattern of annual increases and decreases (Table 1). Dryvopteris 
intermedia had the highest total fertile leaf production in 1994 following one of the two 
coldest winters of the study and had the lowest total fertile leaf production following 
the ice storm in 1998. In contrast, P acrostichoides had the lowest fertile leaf 
production in 1996 following one of the two coldest winters of the study and exhibited 
no unusual response after the ice storm. Investigations into the specific triggers for 
fertile leaf production have been recommended by Wagner & Wagner (1977) and could 
identify potential environmental factors involved. For example, it has been 


SHARPE: TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SPOROPHYTE FERTILITY 22] 


TABLE 1. Summary of annual variation in crown and plant fertility for reproductively 
mature sporophytes of Dryopteris intermedia and Polystichum acrostichoides. N is the 
number of plants measured. One-sample t-tests are used to compare years for 
percentage of plants and transition type percentages. Repeated measures analysis of 
variance is used to compare years for individual percentage of crowns fertile. Paired 
t-test is used to compare the year-to-year differences between species. Significant 
differences are indicated by * (P < 0.0500), ** (P < 0.0100) and *** (P < 0.0010). 


Year Fertile leaves in crown Percentage — Transition type percentages 
N_ Percentage of of plants 
crown (mean) fertile SS SF FF FS 


Dryopteris intermedia 


1993 1 35.1+4.87% 77% - - - - 
1994 31 38.945.88% 71% 10% 13% 58% 19% 
1995 31 33.9+5.09% 71% 13% 16% 55% 16% 
1996 31 22.945.11% 48% 23% 7% 42% 29% 
1997 31 35.1+4.63% 77% 23% 29% 48% 0% 
1998 31 21.945.35% 42% 23% 0% 42% 36% 
1999 31 23.8+4.58% 55% 39% 19% 36% 7% 
2000 31 27.344.12% 68% 26% 19% 48% 7% 
All 248 29.9+1.68% 64% 22% 15% 47% 15% 
F/t F = 1.88 t= 11.52 t=6.11 4.10 1449 3.28 
df 7 7 6 6 6 6 
P 0.0748 <0.0001 0.0009 0.0063 <0.0000 0.1637 
EK RK *K RK 
Polystichum acrostichoides 
199 49 .6+10.64% 64% - ~ as ~ 
1994 14 41.4+9.73% 71% 23% 23% 46% 23% 
1995 14 44.2+10.85% 71% 15% 15% 54% 15% 
1996 14 37.6£11.99% 57% 33% 0% 58% 8% 
1997 14 50.4411.28% 71% 17% 25% 50% 8% 
1998 14 52.7+10.27% 79% 14% 21% 57% 7% 
1999 14 60.6+9.14% 93% 0% 21% 71% 7% 
2000 14 47.4+9.01% 71% 0% 7™% 64% 29% 
All 112 48.0+1.71% 72% 12% 16% 58% 14% 
F/t F = 0.56 t= 12.97 t=284 457 322 4.19 
df 7 | 6 6 6 6 
F 0.7891 <0.0001 0.0295 0.0038 <0.0000 0.0057 
kK * *x RK ** 
Species comparisons 
t -4.57 =].22 1.22 -0.31 -1.76 0.38 
df 6 6 


| ey 6 6 
P 0.0026 0.2603 0.2696 0.7702 0.1298 0.7186 
** 


228 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 223-234. 2005 


demonstrated in greenhouse studies (Siman & Sheffield, 2002) that under field 
conditions individuals do not necessarily produce the maximum number of fertile 
leaves possible each year. In a year-long study of Polypodium vulgare L. in the United 
Kingdom, field-grown and greenhouse-grown plants from identical genetic stock were 
compared by Siman & Sheffield (2002). The indoor population showed a four-fold 
increase in new leaves, mostly fertile, emerging in a wave pattern thought to represent 
three annual cohorts for field grown plants as compared to the outdoor population. 
There do appear to be limits to fertile leaf production which may be consistent within 
species over an extended period of time. Experiments similar to this one done by Siman 
& Sheffield (2002) would confirm these limitations. 

Plant fertili 

Of 248 individual leaf cohorts of D. intermedia observed during the eight years of the 
study, 64% included at least one fertile leaf, while for 112 cohorts of P. acrostichoides 
the percentage was 72% (Table 1). The percentage of plants in the population that 
produced at least one fertile leaf each year ranged from a low of 42% in 1998 to a high 
of 77% in 1993 for D. intermedia, a range from the lowest year to the highest of 35%, 
reflecting significant year-to-year variation. For P. acrostichoides there were also 
significant year-to-year differences, with a range from the lowest year (1996) to the 
highest year (1999) of 36% (Table 1). For D. intermedia, the lowest percentage of plant 
fertility occurred following the ice storm. A paired comparison of annual plant fertility 
percentages did not detect a significant difference between the two species (Table 1). 
Annual sequence of plant fertility status 

There are some elements of life history than can only be determined by making repeated 
observations of marked individuals over a long period of time. One of those elements 
is the year-to-year change in an individual sporophyte’s fertility status. Overall, a plant 
was sterile one year as well as the next (SS) 48 times in the 217 observations of 
transition for D. intermedia (Table 1). Of these SS transitions, 9 (3 plants) occurred 
before a plant produced its first fertile leaf while for all others (81%) the SS transition 
occurred after the plant had produced at least one fertile leaf. For P acrostichoides, SS 
transitions occurred 11 times out of 98 transition observations, with one plant (of 14) 
accounting for all of the SS transitions that occurred before a fertile leaf was produced. 
Thus 89% of the SS transitions for P. acrostichoides occurred after a fertile leaf had 
been produced. Sterile to fertile (SF) transitions occurred in 15% of the D. intermedia 
observations and 16% of the P. acrostichoides observations (Table 1). 

Fertile to fertile (FF) transitions occurred in 47% of the D. intermedia observations 
and 58% of the P. acrostichoides observations (Table 1). A small percentages of all D. 
intermedia plants observed produced fertile leaves only once or twice, while all P 
acrostichoides individuals produced at least one fertile leaf during three or more years 
(Table 2A). Although all plants in this study were reproductively mature, only 16% of 
the individuals of D. intermedia and 14% of the individuals of P. achrostichoides 
produced at least one fertile leaf during each of the eight years of the study (Table 2A). 
Of the sporophytes of D. intermedia which were fertile at the start of the study in 1993, 
75% were fertile in 1994 while only 21% were consistently fertile through 2000, the last 
year of the study (Table 2B). Of the sporophytes of P. acrostichoides which were fertile 
in 1993, 67% were fertile in 1994, compared to the 60.8% sequential reproducers 
observed in a two-year study of this species in southeastern Ohio by Greer & McCarthy 
(2000). By 2000, only 22% of the P. acrostichoides the individuals that were fertile in 
1993 could be called sequential reproducers. Thus, as the number of years a plant is 


SHARPE: TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SPOROPHYTE FERTILITY Zao 


monitored increased, the percentage of sequential reproducers decreased at 
approximately the same rate for both species (Table 2B). 

Fertile to sterile transitions (FS) reverse the more common trend of fertile-to-fertile 
transitions in the chronological maturation of a reproductively mature sporophyte 
described by Sheffield (1996). However, plants that were fertile one year and produced 


TABLE 2. Comparison of fertility and sterility frequencies for reproductively mature 
sporophytes of D. intermedia and P. acrostichoides observed for an eight-year period 
from 1993 to 2000. Table A includes all plants which became fertile during the 
eight-year monitoring period. Table B includes only plants which were fertile in 1993. 


Years D. intermedia P. acrostichoides 


A. Number of years that individuals are fertile 


l 7% 0% 
2 3% 0% 
a 16% 21% 
+ 12% 7% 
a 16% 21% 
6 19% 14% 
7 9% 21% 
8 16% 14% 


B. Number of consecutive years that fertile individuals remain fertile 


l 100% 100% 
= 75% 67% 
5 63% 67% 
4 38% 56% 
5 38% 56% 
6 29% 44% 
7 25% 44% 
8 21% 22% 
C. Number of fertile/sterile transitions per individual 
l 54% 50% 
2 32% 37% 
E 14% 13% 


D. Span of sterile years after and before a fertile year 


Ap WN 
xe 
oS 
S 
= 


230 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 223-234. 2005 


no fertile leaves the next year (FS) were seen in 15% of the D. intermedia observations 
and 14% of the P. acrostichoides transition observations. For D. intermedia, 70% of the 
individuals reverted to sterile status from fertile status (FS) at least once during the 
eight-year monitoring period, while 57% of P. acrostichoides individuals had FS 
transitions. For approximately half of the plants of both species an FS transition 
occurred only once (Table 2C). Given that a plant must transition back to fertile status 
in order to become sterile again, the maximum number of FS transitions possible in an 
eight-year study is three. This maximum number of FS transitions was noted for 14% 
of the observations for D. intermedia and 13% of the FS observations for P. 
acrostichoides. The span of years that a previously fertile sporophyte remained sterile 
ranged from one to five for D. intermedia and one to four for P. acrostichoides (Table 
2D). For both species the majority (60%) remained sterile for only one year (Table 2D). 
Of the FS transitions for Drvopteris intermedia (Table 1), most occurred in 1998 (36%), 
following the ice storm and in 1996 (29%), following a winter with very low daily 
minimum temperatures (Table 1). For P. acrostichoides most FS transitions (29%) 
occurred in 2000 (Table 1). 

Crown size and changes plant fertility status 

Changes in crown size can be related to the annual transitions to and from fertile leaf 
production. Plants maintained a stable crown size following FF transitions (Table 3). 
Crown size was also stable for SS transitions for D. intermedia, though it increased for 
P. acrostichoides. However, following FS transitions, individual plants produce a 
significantly smaller sterile crown by over half a leaf (Table 3). Following SF 
transitions, the increase in the size of the fertile crown is also significant for D. 
intermedia, with an increase in P. acrostichoides as well (Table 3). Thus, even for the 
same individuals, the number of leaves in the crown increases with a shift from plant 
sterility to fertility. On a smaller scale than that observed experimentally by Siman & 
Sheffield (2002), it appears that when field conditions favor above-average fertile leaf 
production for D. intermedia and P. acrostichoides, more leaves are produced. 
TABLE 3. Comparison of changes in crown sizes for transitions in plant fertility sta- 
tus from one year to the next. Significant differences are indicated by * (P < 0.0500) 
and ** (P< 0.0100). 


Transition Dryopteris intermedia Polystichum acrostichoides 
ean t F N ls 
difference difference 


Fertile/Fertile 101 -0.04040.186 -0.21 0.8314 53 -0.07640.294 0.26 0.7982 
Sterile/Sterile 48 -0.02140.210 -2.25 0.0308* — 11 +0.727+40.304 -1.13 0.2793 
Fertile/Sterile 35 -0.57140.254 3.20 0.0031** 13 -0.53940.475 1.16 0.2654 
Sterile/Fertile 33 +0.727+0.227 -0.10 0.9212 15 +0.33340.287 2.39 0.0379* 


Min/Max -4/+6 -7/+5 
F 3.57 bore 
P 0.0149* 0.3438 


SHARPE: TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SPOROPHYTE FERTILITY 231 


CONCLUSIONS 

The most striking observations to emerge from this temporal study of annual variation 
in individual plant fertility are 1) the overall low level of fertile leaf production in both 
species with very few observations of whole crown fertility, 2) the inconsistency of the 
percentage of the crown which is fertile from year to year, 3) significant differences in 
the number of plants that are fertile from year to year for each species, a phenomenon 
possibly linked to winter weather conditions, 4) the difference between species in the 
overall percentage of plants that are fertile 5) the similarities between species with 
respect to the annual patterns in changes of the percentages of fertile plants and 
transitions in plant fertility status 6) the significant year-to-year variation in the percent 
of the population that experiences a fertile to fertile plant status transition, 7) expansion 
of individual crown size when fertile leaves are produced, and reduction of crown size 
when a fertile plant fails to produce fertile leaves the following year. Most of these 
characteristics of fertile leaf production could not have been known without annual 
monitoring of marked individuals. Though eight years seems to be a relatively short 
time compared to the life span of long-lived sporophytes, it was possible to quantify 
several previously untested assumptions about sporophyte growth. 

The original intention of this study was to determine if annual variability in plant 
fertility could be detected in field populations of sporophytes of temperate species. With 
the exception of general observations relating to significant local weather patterns, no 
attempt was made to determine the cause of any observed variation. It is certainly clear 
from these results that there can be a high level of annual variability in fertile leaf 
production in temperate ferns. It is also clear that observing a sporophyte only once can 
lead to a number of erroneous assumptions about its past life history status. A plant with 
no fertile leaves cannot automatically be assumed to be an immature plant. A plant with 
one fertile leaf may or may not have been producing fertile leaves longer than one with 
a 100% fertile crown. A plant that is fertile may or may not be fertile the following year. 
A population that has the same proportion of fertile plants from one year to the next may 
still reflect numerous changes due to independent changes in the fertility status of 
individual plants. While the two species chosen for observation in this study may differ 
in the overall number and timing of fertile leaves produced, there was a striking 
similarity in the frequency of the different types of year-to-year transitions in plant 
fertility status. 

Fundamental to understanding of all of these observations is a knowledge of the 
specific process that determines whether an emergent leaf will be fertile or sterile 
(White 1971). The current exploratory study, limited as it was to simply observing the 
reproductive sporophyte, has provided few clues about the stimuli behind the observed 
patterns. The differences between species detected in this long-term field study of just 
two species indicate that for each species the fertility triggers may be different. 
Significant year-to-year variation in plant fertility suggests that environmental factors 
may be important. Annual variation may be related to climate factors but the relatively 
short time span of the study and the many potential microhabitat influences require 
experiments to properly assess these observations. 

More long-term field studies are needed as the differences between these two 
species suggest that the patterns of leaf and plant fertility can vary widely. Because the 
limitations on observing plants in the field were unknown at the start of this study, 
sample sizes of plants for which data was available for all eight years were small by the 


aan FERN GAZ. 17(4): 223-234. 2005 


end of the study, especially for P acrostichoides. The number of plant fertility 
transitions from fertile to sterile taking place after a plant had become reproductively 
mature could only be observed a maximum of three times in an eight-year period, 
limiting the potential for identifying underlying causes. Only one large cyclic event 
occurred during the study, limiting the potential for generalizations about disturbance 
effects. 

The length of study was limited because of the choice of study site. It was conducted 
on private land which changed hands after eight years and was no longer accessible for 
research. For long-lived perennials, a long-term study should encompass a large part of 
the life span of a sporophyte, and should ideally extend to 100 years or more. As 
indicated by Werth & Cousens (1990), a long-term study should be conducted at a site 
guaranteed to be in place for the long-term. The Long Term Ecological Research 
(LTER) program (Van Cleve & Martin 1991) which has extended world-wide from its 
original designation of sites in the United States can provide such stable study locations 
for future long-term studies. The LTER sites also provide for maintenance of 
standardized data sets long-term which allows for continual monitoring of marked 
individuals beyond the lifetime of a single individual researcher. The availability of 
LTER data on the internet also facilitates supplemental short-term studies and 
experiments based on earlier observations, another recommendation made by Werth & 
Cousens (1990). Long-term natural experiments such as this one rely on inference from 
uncontrolled climate data. Although this approach does not have the rigor of a 
controlled experiment, it does document variation under real environmental conditions. 
Another advantage of conducting both long and short term studies at an LTER is the 
continual monitoring of climate parameters as well as other abiotic and _ biotic 
environmental characteristics which can be related to an individual researcher’s 
observations about ferns. 

This long-term study of fertility in two wintergreen fern species from the same 
forest showed different patterns of annual variation, suggesting that any future 
ecological assumptions about ferns must account for differences among fern species. 
Studies of populations of both D. intermedia and P. acrostichoides throughout their 
ranges are needed and other life history stages could exhibit such amplitudes of annual 
variability as well. Long-term field monitoring and additional experimentation with 
other fern species will be necessary before the ecological generalizations hoped for by 
Harper (1982) can be made. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
I am grateful for the encouragement given to me by Mike Cousens many years ago. His 
pioneering work in fern demographic studies inspired many of the questions I have 
addressed. Thought-provoking discussions of fern ecology with Herb Wagner and 
Charlie Werth further stimulated my enthusiasm for field studies of ferns. This paper is 
dedicated to the memory of these three pteridologists whose insights based on field 
studies were incomparable. 


REFERENCES 
ANALYTICAL SOFTWARE, INC. 2003. Statistix 8. Analytical Software, Inc., 
Tallahassee FL. 
BARTSCH, I. & LAWRENCE, J. 1997. Leaf size and biomass allocation in Thelypteris 
dentata, Woodwardia virginica, and Osmunda regalis in central Florida. Amer. Fern 


SHARPE: TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SPOROPHYTE FERTILITY 233 


J. 87:71-76. 

COUSENS, M.I. 1973. Reproductive biology and autecology of Blechnum spicant. 
Ph.D. Dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman, WA. . 

COUSENS, M.I. 1981. Blechnum spicant: habitat and vigor of optimal, marginal, and 
disjunct populations, and field observations of gametophytes. Bot. Gaz. 142:251- 


COUSENS, M.I. 1988. Reproductive strategies of pteridophytes. In: Doust, J.L. & 
Doust, L.L. (Eds) Plant Reproductive Ecology, Patterns and Strategies, pp. 307-328. 
Oxford University Press, New York. 

COUSENS, M.I., LACEY, D.G. & SCHELLER, J.M. 1988. Safe sites and the 
ecological life history of Lorinseria areolata. Amer. J. Bot. 75:797-807. 

DARWIN, A.T., LADD, D., GALDINS, R., CONTRERAS, T.A. & FAHRIG, L. 2004. 
Response of forest understory vegetation to a major ice storm. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 
131: 45-52. 

GREER, GK. & MCCARTHY, B.C. 2000. Patterns of growth and reproduction in a 
natural population of the fern Polystichum acrostichoides. Amer. Fern J. 90:60-76. 

GUREYEVA, I.I. 2001. Homosporous ferns of south Siberia. Tomsk State University 
Publishers, Tomsk, Russia. 

HARPER, J.L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York. 

HARPER, J.L. 1982. After description. In: NEMAN, E.I. (Ed) The plant community as 
a working mechanism, pp 11-25. Blackwell Scientific, Boston MA. 

JOHNSON-GROH, C. 1999. Population ecology of Botrychium (Moonworts): status 
report on Minnesota Botrvchium permanent plot monitoring. Gustavus Adolphus 
College, St. Peter MN. 

MONTGOMERY, J.D. 1990. Survivorship and predation changes in five populations of 
Botrychium dissectum in eastern Pennsylvania. Amer. Fern J. 80:173-182. 

MONTGOMERY, J.D. & WAGNER, W.H. JR., 1993. Dryopteris. In: Flora of North 
America Editorial Committee (Eds). Flora of North America north of Mexico, 
Volume 2, pp. 28-290. Oxford University Press, New York. 

NOSS, REED F. 1999. Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: a suggested 
framework and indicators. For. Ecol. Man. 115:135-146. 

PECK, J.H. 1980. Life history and reproductive biology of the ferns of Woodman 
Hollow, Webster County, Iowa. Ph.D. Dissertation, lowa State University, Ames, 


SATO, T. 1990. Estimation of chronological age for sporophyte maturation in three 
semi-evergreen ferns in Hokkaido.Ecological Research 5: 55-62. 

SHARPE, J.M. 1997. Leaf growth and demography of the rheophytic fern Thelypteris 
angustifolia (Willdenow) Proctor in a Puerto Rican rainforest. Plant Ecology 
130:203-212. 

SHEFFIELD, E. 1996. From pteridophyte spore to sporophyte in the natural 
environment. In: CAMUS, J.M., GIBBY, M. & JOHNS, R.J. (Eds) Pteridology in 
Perspective, pp. 541-549. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 

SIMAN, S.E. & SHEFFIELD, E. 2002. Polvpodium vulgare plants pe 
continuously in a non-seasonal glasshouse environment. Amer. Fern J. -3 
SIMAN, S.E., POVEY, A.C. & SHEFFIELD, E. 1999. Human health ea a — 

spores—A review. Fern Gazette 15:275-287. . 

SUSSEX, I.M. 1958. A morphological and experimental study of leaf development in 

Leptopteris hvmenophylloides (A. Rich) Presl. Phytomorphology 8:96-107. 


234 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 223-234. 2005 


VAN CLEVE, K. & MARTIN, S. (Eds). 1991. Long-term ecological research in the 
United States. University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Seattle. 
VON ADERKAS, P. & GREEN, P.E.J. 1986. Leaf development of the ostrich fern 

Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Todaro. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 93: 307-321. 

WAGNER, D.H. 1993. Polystichum. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee 
(Eds) Flora of North America north of Mexico, Volume 2, pp. 290-299. Oxford 
University Press, New York. 

WAGNER, W.H. JR. & WAGNER, F.S. 1977. Fertile-sterile leaf dimorphy in ferns. 
Gard. Bull. Singapore 30:251-267. 

WERTH, C.R. & COUSENS, M.I. 1990. Summary: the contributions of population 
studies on ferns. Amer. Fern J. 80: 183-190. 

WHITE, R. A. 1971. Experimental and developmental studies of the fern sporophyte. 
Bot. Rev. 37:509-540. 


FERN GAZ. 17(4): 235-242. 2005 230 


NEW ZEALAND ASPLENIUM (ASPLENIACEAE: PTERIDOPHYTA) 
REVISITED — DNA SEQUENCING AND AFLP FINGERPRINTING 


L.R. PERRIE' & P.J. BROWNSEY 
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand 
(Email: 'leonp@tepapa.govt.nz) 


Key words: New Zealand, Asplenium, A. hookerianum, A. bulbiferum, A. gracillimum, 
A. richardii, chloroplast DNA sequence, AFLP DNA-fingerprinting, polyploid, 
hybridisation. 


This paper summarises our continuing study of the evolutionary history of 
Asplenium in New Zealand. Chloroplast DNA sequence data and AFLP 
DNA-fingerprinting have been used to examine the origins and relationships of 
the New Zealand Asplenium taxa, to test species boundaries, and to further 
investigate the ancestry of the octoploid Asp/enium taxa belonging to the Austral 
group. 


INTRODUCTION 

In 1863, after three years in New Zealand, Samuel Butler’s “we have one very stupid 
white gentian” (Butler, 1863) was assumedly a frustrated reflection of the difficulty of 
recognising distinct entities within New Zealand Gentaniella Moench (there are 
actually 30 species, and only half have white flowers; Glenny, 2003). Analogous 
sentiments are apparent from those who first dealt taxonomically with Asp/enium L. in 
New Zealand. Joseph Hooker (1855, p.33) wrote “The New Zealand kinds have defied 
all attempts to be limited by words”. Similarly, “[some] are extremely inconstant and 
pass into one another, thus rendering their classification a work of considerable 
difficulty” (Thomson, 1882, p.72), and “The New Zealand species present exceptional 
difficulties to the student, on account of their extreme variability and the manner in 
which several of them are connected by intermediate forms” (Cheeseman, 1906, p.987). 
Allan (1961, p.75) stated that the species of New Zealand Asplenium were “very ill- 
defined”, and that while many appeared to respond “markedly to environmental 
conditions...[,] there is also no doubt that hybridism plays an important part”. 

Indeed, hybridisation has proved to be frequent amongst (some) New Zealand 
Asplenium, and although these hybrids blur the morphological discontinuities between 
taxa, they are sterile and present little opportunity for introgressive gene flow 
(Brownsey, 1977a). The identification of hybrids was an integral part of delimiting taxa 
in Brownsey’s (1977b) taxonomic revision of New Zealand Asplenium, in which 14 
species and four subspecies were recognised. Since that treatment three species have 
been newly described (Brownsey & Jackson 1984; Brownsey, 1985; Brownsey & de 
Lange, 1997), some names have changed (Brownsey, 1979; Brownsey, 1999), and the 
appropriate rank for some taxa has been debated (Ogle, 1985; Brownsey, 1998; Perrie 
& Brownsey, 2005a), such that a present treatment (Table 1) might recognise 18 species 
and four subspecies; comprising approximately 10% of the New Zealand fern flora 
(Brownsey & Smith-Dodsworth, 2000). 

This paper will summarise some of our recent discoveries in New Zealand 
Asplenium, but we emphasise that our understanding of the evolution of New Zealand 


236 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 235-242. 2005 


TABLE 1: A present taxonomic treatment of Asplenium in New Zealand compared 
with that of Brownsey (1977b). 


Present Treatment As treated by Brownsey (1977b) 


A. appendiculatum (Labill.) C.Presl A. terrestre Brownsey subsp. ferrestre 


subsp. appendiculatum 


subsp. maritimum (Brownsey) subsp. maritimum Brownsey 
Brownsey 
A. bulbiferum G.Forst. A. bulbiferum G.Forst. subsp. 
bulbiferum 
A. gracillimum Colenso subsp. gracillimum (Colenso) 
Brownsey 
A. chathamense Brownsey - 
A. cimmeriorum Brownsey et de Lange 
A. flabellifolium Cav. A, flabellifolium Cav. 
A. flaccidum G.Forst. subsp. flaccidum A. flaccidum G.Forst. subsp. flaccidum 
subsp. haurakiense Brownsey subsp. haurakiense Brownsey 
A. hookerianum Colenso A. hookerianum Colenso 
A. lamprophyllum Carse A. lamprophyllum Carse 
A. lyallii (Hook.f.) T.Moore A, lyallii (Hook.f.) T.Moore 
A. oblongifolium Colenso A. lucidum Forst.f. 
A. obtusatum G.Forst. subsp. obtusatum | A. obtusatum G.Forst. subsp. 
obtusatum 
subsp. northlandicum Brownsey subsp. northlandicum Brownsey 
A. pauperequitum Brownsey et P.J.Jacks. | - 
A. polvodon G.Forst. A, polyodon G.Forst. 
A, richardii (Hook.f.) Hook.f. A. richardii (Hook.f.) Hook.f. 
A. scleroprium Hombr. A. scleroprium Hombr. 
A. shuttleworthianum Kunze A. shuttleworthianum Kunze 
A. trichomanes L. subsp. quadrivalens A. trichomanes L. 


D.E.Mey emend Lovis 


subsp. nov. - 


PERRIE & BROWNSEY: NEW ZEALAND ASPLENIUM REVISITED za7 


Asplenium is far from complete 
RELATIONSHIPS AND BIOGEOGRAPHY 

Brownsey (1977a) considered the Asp/enium species hybridising in New Zealand to 
comprise a closely related group, dubbed the ‘Austral’ group, and this has been 
supported by phylogenetic analyses of chloroplast DNA sequence data (Perrie & 
Brownsey, 2005a). The species in New Zealand that do not hybridise there - A. 
flabellifolium, A. trichomanes, A. pauperequitum, and A. polvodon - have closer 
affinities elsewhere (the former three with a primarily temperate, northern hemisphere 
group, and 4. polyodon with a group that includes 4. aethiopicum). Interestingly, the 
Austral group is closely related to the bird’s nest ferns (e.g., 4. australasicum (J.Sm.) 
Hook.) and the finely dissected A. theciferum (Kunth) Mett., which, as Loxoscaphe 
thecifera (Kunth) T.Moore, is the type of Loxoscaphe T.Moore. 

Amongst the New Zealand members of the Austral group, three chloroplast sub- 
groups are clearly delimited: the Bulbiferum, Flaccidum, and Obtusatum chloroplast 
groups (Perrie & Brownsey, 2005a). However, it remains unclear how these groups are 
related to one another, as different DNA regions support conflicting relationships: 
{{Bul,Obt}Fla} with 71% bootstrap support from the rbcL gene, versus 
{{Bul,Fla}Obt} with 85% bootstrap support from the trnL-trnF intergenic spacer. 

Molecular dating, using penalised likelihood of rbhcL DNA sequence data and a 
calibration of 140 million years ago for the divergence of Asplenium and 
Hymenasplenium Hayata, recovers dates of 45 million years ago or younger for the 
divergence between each New Zealand Asp/enium species and its closest non-New 
Zealand relative in the sample set analysed (Perrie & Brownsey, 2005a). The calibration 
age is probably conservatively old (for instance, Schneider e¢ al. (2004) calculated the 
Asplenium-Hymenasplenium split at just 55 million years ago), so it is likely that the 
estimated divergence ages are (considerably) younger than actually calculated. In any 
case, the estimated ages of the divergence are much more recent than the geological 
separation of New Zealand from Gondwana (c.80 million years ago), implicating 
multiple events of long-distance dispersal in the origins of New Zealand Asplenium 
(Perrie & Brownsey, 2005a). The entire Austral group appears to have arisen after New 
Zealand’s isolation. Therefore, the disjunct distributions of each of the seven Austral 
Asplenium taxa that occur in New Zealand and elsewhere requires inference of at least 
one dispersal event (unless the taxa are actually polyphyletic). Dispersal across the 
Tasman Sea (c.2000 km) is potentially so common that it would be of considerable 
interest to investigate the degree of genetic isolation between Australian and New 
Zealand populations of shared fern species. 


Figure 1. Plants from the ec Ranges of rece ry ianum n that exhibit the 
broad-pinnuled and narrow-pinnuled morphology that has previously been referred to 
as A. hookerianum and A. colensoi, respectively. 


238 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 235-242. 2005 


ASPLENIUM HOOKERIANUM 

AFLP DNA-fingerprinting has been used in conjunction with chloroplast DNA 
sequencing to investigate some groups in more detail. The morphologically distinct 
Asplenium hookerianum and A. colensoi were described by Colenso (1845) in the same 
publication; the ultimate segments are broad in the former, and narrow in the latter 
(Figure 1). It is quite common to find sites where both broad and narrow-pinnuled 
plants grow together, with few if any intermediates, thereby creating the impression of 
two morphologically discrete groups growing in sympatry. However, genetic variation 
as assayed by AFLP DNA-fingerprinting and chloroplast DNA sequencing is not 
concordant with the morphological variation (Perrie & Brownsey, 2005b), and indicates 
that only one species should be recognised (i.e., A. hookerianum). 


ASPLENIUM BULBIFERUM 

In part because of the apparent origins of Asplenium (bulbiferum subsp.) gracillimum 
discussed below, we believe that the taxa previously recognised as A. bulbiferum subsp. 
bulbiferum and A. bulbiferum subsp. gracillimum (Brownsey, 1977b) should be treated 
at the specific level as A. bulbiferum s.s. (hereafter simply A. bulbiferum) and A. 
gracillimum (Perrie & Brownsey, 2005a). Circumscribed as such, the name A. 


A. hookerianum 

> 

> 

rs) 

3 

> 

oO 

=, 

pst) 

3 

J 

3 

. - ae Qe 
A. richardii > 
A. gracillimum $ 
2 

Jee ane eR CER PPS eat = 

3 

© 

3 
ba A. richardii 


A. bulbiferum 


A B 


a A. bulbiferum 


Figure 2. A: Maximum parsimony analysis of 469 AFLP characters for the tetraploids 
Asplenium bulbiferum and A. hookerianum, together with the octoploid A. richardii, a 
putative autopolyploid of A. hookerianum. Representatives from one of the A. 
gracillimum lineages are included for comparison. One of 55 most parsimonious trees, 
which differ in the internal arrangement of samples within 4. bu/biferum and A. 
hookerianum. Thickened branches indicate those with >80% bootstrap support. B: One 
of three most parsimonious trees, differing in the arrangement of the A. hookerianum 
and A. gracillimum samples, from chloroplast trnL-trnF region DNA sequence data. 
ae: using samples from the Flaccidum and Obtusatum chloroplast groups (not 
shown). 


PERRIE & BROWNSEY: NEW ZEALAND ASPLENIUM REVISITED 239 


cae ila is then restricted to tetraploid plants, and is endemic to New Zealand. 

urther, it is quite distinct from the plant common in cultivation that is frequently 
hare “A. bulbiferum” (Perrie et al., 2005). Asplenium bulbiferum appears to be less 
genetically variable than its closest known tetraploid relative, A. hookerianum. Only 
one trnL-trnF region haplotype is presently known from A. bulbiferum, as opposed to 
eight in A. hookerianum. Also, only 38% of AFLP loci were polymorphic within A. 
bulbiferum, compared to 52% within A. hookerianum, despite more populations being 
sampled from the former. 


ASPLENIUM GRACILLIMUM 

The octoploid Asplenium gracillimum (previously A. bulbiferum subsp. gracillimum) 
appears to be an allopolyploid between the tetraploids A. bulbiferum and A. 
hookerianum. Asplenium gracillimum produces bulbils like A. bu/biferum (albeit with 
much less frequency), but has the chloroplast DNA sequence of A. hookerianum (Perrie 
& Brownsey, 2005a). Further, A. gracillimum is intermediate between its two putative 


app.app, 
obt.nor lya scl app.mar shu 


= 

ee 

ae a 
. . Pg 

. . ao” 

‘ ae 

; 

r we . 

{ | 


bul obt.obt  obl flc.flc, flc.hau, lam 
cha 


Figure 3. Hypothesised origins for the New Zealand species of the Asp/enium Austral 
group. Octoploid taxa subtended by a single arrow are thought to be autopolyploids. 
Probable allopolyploids are subtended by two arrows. Solid arrows re flect linkages 
indicated by chloroplast DNA sequences; dashed arrows are linkages inferred from 
morphology. Arrows not pointing directly to a tetraploid taxon reflect uncertainty. Taxa 


are represented by the first three letters of their name in Table 1, except “fle” = 
flaccidum. Fronds are not to scale. 


240 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 235-242. 2005 


parents with regards to frond architecture, scale shape, and habitat. 

Reminiscent of the results of Trewick ef al. (2002) with Asplenium ceterach L., 
chloroplast DNA sequence haplotypes shared by Asplenium hookerianum and A. 
gracillimum indicate that the latter has had multiple polyploid origins. Although this 
work is still preliminary, the different chloroplast DNA sequence haplotypes found in 
A. gracillimum appear to correspond to distinct groups detected with AFLP (Perrie & 
Brownsey, in prep.). Some of these apparently independently derived lineages of A. 
gracillimum appear to be sympatric, but it is unknown what happens reproductively 
where they meet. 


ASPLENIUM CIMMERIORUM 

The recently described Asplenium cimmeriorum has a conservation status of ‘sparse’, 
being known only from limestone regions in the north-west of the South Island and 
around Waitomo in the North Island (Brownsey & de Lange, 1997). Chloroplast DNA 
sequences indicate that the north and south populations of 4. cimmeriorum have 
independent derivations; one with an 4. hookerianum-like chloroplast and the other 
with an A. bu/biferum-like chloroplast (Perrie, de Lange, & Brownsey, in prep.). AFLP 
also recovers them as distinct groups (with both also distinct from 4. gracillimum). This 
suggests a need to provide independent conservation assessments, with the northern 
Waitomo plants being much less common than those in the south. 

Both groups of Asplenium cimmeriorum appear to be allopolyploids between A. 
bulbiferum and A. hookerianum (like A. gracillimum). This situation presents the 
problem of how to deal taxonomically with multiple lineages of independent but 
effectively equivalent origins, some of which are ecologically and/or morphologically 
recognisable (e.g., A. cimmeriorum from A. gracillimum) while others are not (e.g., the 
cryptic lineages within A. gracillimum). 


ASPLENIUM RICHARDII 

The octoploid Asplenium richardii is possibly an (old) autopolyploid of a narrow- 
pinnuled plant of 4. hookerianum. In maximum parsimony analysis of AFLP data, A. 
richardii falls just outside the diversity found in extant 4. hookerianum, which contrasts 
with the putatively allopolyploid lineages of A. gracillimum that lie intermediate 
between 4. bulbiferum and A. hookerianum (Figure 2; see Perrie et a/. (2003a) for 
discussion of AFLP data and type of polyploidy). The chloroplast DNA sequences of A. 
richardii are allied to, but nevertheless distinct from, those found in extant 4. 
hookerianum (Figure 2). This suggests that if A. richardii is an autopolyploid from a 
narrow-pinnuled, A. hookerianum-like plant, then it is perhaps not of recent origin. That 
is, sufficient subsequent time has passed since its origin that the A. richardii chloroplast 
DNA sequences have (a) been lost from the extant populations of A. hookerianum 
and/or (b) acquired apomorphic changes. 


AUSTRAL GROUP OCTOPLOID ORIGINS 

Chloroplast DNA sequences have revealed the origins of the octoploid, New Zealand 
taxa from the Austral group with varying degrees of precision (Perrie & Brownsey, 
2004, 2005a), and our present knowledge is summarised in Figure 3. For instance, 
Asplenium hookerianum and A. gracillimum actually share trnL-trnF region haplotypes 
(Perrie & Brownsey, 2005a; Perrie & Brownsey, in prep.), while more than 2000 base- 
pairs from four chloroplast loci are unable to differentiate between A. oblongifolium and 


PERRIE & BROWNSEY: NEW ZEALAND ASPLENIUM REVISITED _ 241 


A. obtusatum subsp. obtusatum as the chloroplast parents of A. /vallii and A. 
scleroprium (Perrie & Brownsey, 2004). Some of the octoploids are thought to have 
autopolyploid origins: A. appendiculatum (from an A. flaccidum-like or A. 
chathamense-like progenitor), A. obtusatum subsp. northlandicum (possibly from A. 
obtusatum subsp. obtusatum), and A. richardii (see above). Others are probably 
allopolyploids: A. cimmeriorum, A. gracillimum (see above), A. lvallii (between 
something in the Obtusatum chloroplast group and possibly 4. hookerianum), and A. 
scleroprium (between something in the Obtusatum chloroplast group and something 
like A. flaccidum). Asplenium shuttleworthianum has chloroplast DNA sequences that 
nest within the Flaccidum chloroplast group, but no close tetraploid is known. 


CONCLUSION 

The extant Asplenium of New Zealand are derived from disparate groups within the 
genus. Long-distance dispersal has seemingly played a major role in shaping the 
distributions of Asplenium in the south-west Pacific, as is the case for much of the flora 
of New Zealand (Winkworth et al. 2002: Perrie et al. 2003b). Genetic data has allowed 
the further unravelling of the histories of some of the Austral octoploids and a resolution 
of some taxonomic problems (e.g., 4. hookerianum), but it also has unveiled new 
avenues for investigation (e.g., the multiple, cryptic groups within 4. gracillimum). 
Many issues within New Zealand Asp/enium remain to be tackled, such as clarifying the 
boundaries between some taxa (e.g., Perrie & Brownsey, 2004) and establishing the 
most appropriate ranks for others (Ogle, 1987). 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
We are grateful to Peter de Lange and Lara Shepherd who have collaborated with us on 
some aspects of this work, and to the organisers for the opportunity to contribute to the 
Ferns for the 21St Century conference and its proceedings. This work was funded by the 
Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (contract MNZX0201). 


REFERENCES 

ALLAN, H.H. 1961. Flora of New Zealand, Vol. 1. Government Printer, Wellington. 

BROWNSEY, P.J. 1977a. Asplenium hybrids in the New Zealand flora. New Zealand J. 
Bot. 15: 601-637. 

BROWNSEY, P.J. 1977b. A taxonomic revision of the New Zealand species of 
Asplenium. New Zealand J. Bot. 15: 39-86. 

BROWNSEY, P.J. 1979. Asplenium lucidum Forst.f., an illegitimate name for the New 
Zealand shining spleenwort. New Zealand J. Bot. 17: 217-218. 

BROWNSEY, P.J. 1985. Asplenium chathamense - a new fern species from the 
Chatham Islands, New Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot. 23: 135-140 

BROWNSEY, P.J. 1998. Aspleniaceae. Fl. Australia 48: 295-327. 

BROWNSEY, P.J. 1999. A new combination in Asplenium. New Zealand J. Bot. 37: 


BROWNSEY, P.J., JACKSON, P.J. 1984. Asplenium pauperequitum — a new fern 
species from the Poor Knights Islands, New Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot. 22: 
315-321. 

BROWNSEY, P.J., DE LANGE, P.J. 1997. ig ou cimmeriorum, a new fern species 
from New Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot. 35: 283-292. 

BROWNSEY, P.J., SMITH-DODSWORTH, 1c. 2000. New Zealand ferns and allied 


242 FERN GAZ. 17(4): 235-242. 2005 


plants. 2nd eq. David Bateman Ltd., Auckland. 

BUTLER, S. 1863. A first year in Canterbury Settlement. Butler, London. 

CHEESEMAN, T.F. 1906. Man. New Zealand Fl. Government Printer, Wellington. 

COLENSO, W. 1845. A classification and description of some newly discovered ferns, 
collected in the Northern Island of New Zealand, in the summer of 1841-42. 
Tasmanian J. Nat. Sci. 2: 161-189. 

GLENNY, D. 2003. Understanding the New Zealand gentians. Te Taiao 2: 4-5. 

HOOKER, J.D. 1855. Flora Novae Zelandiae, Vol. Il. Reeve, London 

OGLE, C.C. 1987. Taxonomic changes in Asplenium (Aspleniaceae; Filicales) in New 
Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot. 25: 591-593. 

PERRIE, L.R., BROWNSEY, P. J., LOCKHART, P.J., LARGE, M.F. 2003a. Evidence 
for an allopolyploid complex in New Zealand Polystichum. New Zealand J. Bot. 41: 
189-215. 

PERRIE, L.R., BROWNSEY, P. J., LOCKHART, P.J., BROWN, E.A., LARGE, M.F. 
2003b. Biogeography of temperate Australasian Polystichum ferns as inferred from 
chloroplast sequence and AFLP. J. Biogeogr. 30: 1729-1736. 

PERRIE, L.R., BROWNSEY, PJ. 2004. #nL intron variation in New Zealand taxa of 
the Asplenium obtusatum Chloroplast Group. Tuhinga - Records of the Museum of 
New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa 15: 1-5. 

PERRIE, L.R., BROWNSEY, P.J. 2005a. Insights into the biogeography and polyploid 
evolution of New Zealand Asplenium from chloroplast DNA sequence data. Amer. 
Peo J, 95: 1-21, 

PERRIE, L.R., BROWNSEY, P.J. 2005b. Genetic variation is not concordant with 
merevalonien! variation in the fern Asplenium hookerianum sensu lato 
(Aspleniaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 92: 1559-1564. 

PERRIE, L.R., SHEPHERD, L.D., BROWNSEY, P.J. 2005. Asplenium x lucrosum 

nothosp. nov.: a sterile hybrid widely and erroneously cultivated as "Asplenium 
Le ely a Syst. Evol. 250: 243-257. 

SCHNEIDER, H., SCHUETTPELZ, E., PRYER, K.M., CRANFILL, R., 
verter S., LUPIA, R. 2004. Ferns divenittad in the shadow of angiosperms. 
Nature 428: 553-557. 

THOMSON, GM. 1882. The ferns and fern allies of New Zealand. Wise, Dunedin. 

TREWICK , S.A.,. MORGAN-RICHARDS, M., RUSSELL, S.J., HENDERSON, S., 
RUMSEY, F.J., PINTER, I., BARRETT, J.A., GIBBY, M., VOGEL, J.C. 2002. 
Polyploidy, phylogeography and Pleistocene refugia of the rockfern Asplenium 
ceterach: evidence from chloroplast DNA. Molec. Ecol. 11: 2003-2012. 

WINKWORTH, R.C., WAGSTAFF, S.J., GLENNY, D., LOCKHART, P.J. 2002. Plant 
dispersal N.E.W.S from New Zealand. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 514-520. 


243 FERN GAZ. 17(4). 2005 


MOLECULAR EVIDENCE FOR MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF THE 
APOMICTIC TRIPLOID FERN CORNOPTERIS CHRISTENSENIANA 
(WOODSIACEAE) 


C.-H. PARK! & M. KATO” 


‘Laboratory of Ecology Science, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, 
Kyushu University, 6-10-1, Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan 
Corresponding author; (Email: cparkscbh@mbox.nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp) 
“Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, 
University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 


Key words: apogamy, apomixis, Cornopteris christenseniana, hybrid fern, multiple 
origins, triploid 


Apomixis (apogamy in a broad sense, agamospermy, agamospory) is a reproductive 
pathway via chromosomally unreduced spores and gametophytes and the subsequent 
apogamous reproduction (in a strict sense), i.e. asexual production of a sporophyte from 
vegetative cells of a gametophyte. Here we use the term apomixis in a broad sense and 
apogamy in a strict sense to avoid confusion. In pteridophytes, about 10% of the world’s 
species and about 15% of Japanese species are apomictic. Apomixis is often associated 
with polyploidy, and three quarters of apomictic pteridophytes are triploid. It is often 
argued that apomixis, like polyploidy, plays a significant role as an escape from sterility 
caused by hybridization. 

Although Cornopteris christenseniana had been believed to be a sterile triploid 
interspecific hybrid, our previous study showed that it produces viable spores at various 
frequencies and forms apogamous sporophytes at low or moderate frequencies in 
culture (Park & Kato, 2003). It also suggested that apomictic reproduction (in a broad 
sense) occurs naturally in an artificial environment in the Fern Garden of the Botanical 
Gardens, University of Tokyo. We have analyzed molecular variation of the nuclear and 
cpDNA in C. christenseniana and its closely related species. The results strongly 
support the suggestion that many plants of C. christenseniana propagate by apomixis in 
the artificial environment and not by in situ hybridization. We also found that plants of 
C. christenseniana that had been collected from various wild populations, had arisen 
independently on a markedly recurrent basis. We suggest that Cornopteris 
christenseniana is an incipient apomictic species of multiple and polytopic origin, and 
its apomixis is not so strongly regulated as in obligate apomicts. The multiple origins 
of incipient apomicts imply that the evolution of apomixis in C. christenseniana began 
with unreduced sporogenesis with a pleiotropic effect leading to subsequent apogamy. 


REFERENCES 
PARK, C.-H. & KATO, M. 2003 Apomixis in the interspecific triploid hybrid fern 
Cornopteris christenseniana (Woodsiaceae). J. Plant Res. 116(2): 93-104. 


244 FERN GAZ. 17(3). 2005 
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS 


PAPERS should not usually exceed 20 printed pages and are generally expected to be 
considerably shorter. Review articles, as well as reports of original research, are 
encouraged. Short notes are acceptable e.g. new records. The senior author should 
supply a fax and email address to facilitate correspondence. 


MANUSCRIPTS should be submitted in English (British) in electronic format 
(preferably) or hard copy (two copies), in 10-point Times New Roman font and double 
spaced. Electronic versions of text and tables should be compatible with WORD, with 
figures as pdf or jpg files, and sent as email attachments or CDroms. All manuscripts 
will be refereed 


THE TITLE should reflect the content of the paper and be in BOLD CAPITALS (11- 
point) and centrally aligned. Generic and specific names should be in italics and any 
title containing a generic or specific name must be followed by the family and 
Pteridophyta in brackets e.g. 


TRICHOMANES SPECIOSUM (HYMENOPHYLLACEAE: 
PTERIDOPHYTA) IN SOUTHERN SPAIN 


AUTHOR ABBREVIATIONS should follow Pichi ee (1996) Authors of 

scientific names in Pteridophyta, Royal Botanic Gardens, 

MAIN HEADINGS: should be in BOLD CAPITALS (0- point) and centrally 

aligned. 

SUBSIDIARY HEADINGS: sori be in bold, the first letter of each word in capitals, 

the rest in lower case and left-align 

AUTHORS' NAMES AND FULL ADDRESSES: follow the title and are centrally 

aligned. 

KEY WORDS: up to ten. 

ABSTRACT: should reflect the content of the paper. 

FIGURES: there is no distinction between photographs and line drawings in 

numbering. All should be presented in a form ready for reproduction, ideally in JPG 

format (please contact editor with queries), with a scale bar where appropriate. 

Lettering or numbers (Arabic) should be in the bottom left using uppercase Times 

Roman and be sufficiently large to be legible if reduction is necessary during printing. 

The number of photographs allowed in any one issue is limited by cost. Figure captions 

should be on a separate sheet. 

TABLES: can be printed in either portrait or landscape format. Authors should consider 

this when preparing tables. Authors should ensure that tables fit the printed page size in 

a legible form. 

MEASUREMENTS: should follow the metric system. 

CHECKLISTS: should follow the format of Baksh-Comeau, Fern Gaz. 16(1, 2): 11- 

122. 

REFERENCES: should follow the style of a recent issue of The Fern Gazette, e.g.:- 

HOOKER, W.J. 1864. Species Filicum, 5. Dulau & Co., London 

MORTON, C.V. 1947. The American species of Hymenophy llum, section 
Sphaeroconium. Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 29(3): 139-201. 

STEVENSON, D.W. & LOCONTE, H. 1996. Ordinal and familial relationships of 
pteridophyte genera. In: CAMUS, J.M., GIBBY, M. & JOHNS, R.J. (Eds) 
Pteridology in perspective, pp. 435-467. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 

JOURNAL ABBREVIATIONS: should follow Botanico Periodicum Huntianum & 

Supplements. 

Alterations from the original text at proof stage will be charged for unless they are 

minor points of detail. Twenty-five offprints will be supplied free to the senior author. 


aS each year) <e Full Personal 


THE BRITISH PTERIDOLOGICAL SOCII 
Registered Charity No. 1092399 


Patron: HRH The Prince of Wales 
Officers aid Committee from Marth 1005 


President: Dr A.F. Dyer, 499 Lanark Road West, Balerno, Edinburgh EH14 TAL. 
E-mail: President@eBPS. org.uk 
Vice-Presidents : M.H. Rickard, Prof. B.A. Thomas 


Honorary General Secretary: Miss J.M. i: 42 Crown Woods tes Eltham, London SE9 2NN 
ail: Secretary@eBPS.org. uk 


Treasurer: A. Leonard, |! Victory Roa, taka Hants.PO13DR 
il: mail@andrew-leonard.co.uk 
Membership Secretary: — MLS. Porter, 5 West Geet Wigton, Cumbria CA7 9LG © 
E-mail: Membership@eBPS.org.uk — 
Meetings Secretary: PJ. Acie) 13 Star es St erat, Cray, Kent BR5 3LJ _ 
il: Meetings@eBPS.org.uk _ 


Conservation Officer/Recorder: Dr H. Ss: seseimig 180 ee Ra Edinburgh, EHS [AH © 
= . Rumsey, Department of Botany, The Natural History 
Museum, Cromwell Road, Condon. $9 SW7 SBD; E-mail: Conservation@eBPS. org.uk 
Editor of the Bulletin: | Miss A.M. Paul, Department of Botany, The Natural History M fuseum, 
“Cromvell pak London SW7 SBD; E-mail: Bulletin@eBPS. ae uk 


Editor of the Fern Gazett Prof. M. Gibby, Royal Botanic Garden ae 
20A Tnverteith Row, Edinburgh EH3 SLR; E-mail: FernGazette@eBPS. org. ak % 
Editor of the Pteridologist: Dr J.W. Merryweather, "The Whins', Auchtertyre, 
by Kyle of Lochalsh [1V40 8EG; E-mail: Pteridologist@eBPs. org.uk 
Editor of BPS WWW Site - www.eBPS.org.uk: A.C. Pigott, Kersey's Farm, Mendlesham, __ 
Stowmarket, Suffolk IP14 5RB; E-mail: Webmaster@eBPS. org.uk — 


Elected Committee Members: _R.G. Ackers, A.R. Busby, Dr - Golding, Dr M. Hayward, 
F. McGavigan & B.D. Smith _ 
Booksales Organiser: S.J. siees Agios 234 Harold Road, Hastings, East Sussex TN35 SNG _ 
E-mail: Booksales@eBPS. ormuk 
Horticultural Information Officer and Archivist: AR. Busby, 16 Raby Comer Road, Conky, = = 
Co ve entry T 4 8 “7 s ppc 1 yee 


LT. + 


GD; + E-mail: 


Merchandise Organisers: Mr B.D. & Mrs G Smith, Rookwood, | Prospect Rd, 
Oulton Broad, o Laren Suffolk NR32 3PT; E-mail: Merchandise@eBPS.org.uk 3 
Plant Exchange Organiser R.G. Ackers, Deersbrook, Horsham Road, Walliswood, 


Surrey RH5 5RL; E-mail: PlantExchange@eBPS.org.uk vies 

Spore Exchange Organisers: Mr B. & Mrs A. Wright, 130 Prince Rupert Drive, Tockwith, = 
York YO26 7PU; E-mail: Spores@ eBPS.orguk 

_ Trustees of Greenfield & Conienary Funds: ae A.F. Dyer, Miss JM. Ide, A. Leonard es 


The BRITISH PTERIDOLOGICAL SOCIETY was founded i in ike and today continues asa s focus a fae 
fern enthusiasts. It provides a wide range of informatio blications cae 
me once literature. It also organises formal talks, informal discussions, field ‘meetings, oe visits. : 
The S ; has a wide membership ' which sikaded ee 
ae ers, nurserymen and | botanists, both amateur and professi eelteeal The Society's journals, the Fern Gazette, 
Preridologist and ee are published annually. The Fern Gazette pee matter chiefly of specialist 
interest on inter dology, the Preridologist, topics of. wet serial catty |, and the e Bulletin, Society 
_ ses and ets eps www Sos restuc’y wEBrSo org.uk : 


: We a PAA Doe. PRA 


— Members He Siccotieg bs Institutions £33. Family menbeabin in any. aac ee 
_ Applications for membership should be sent to the . 


: for a 
g Order forms are available from 


"Back numbers of the Fem Gazette, Preridologist and Bulletin 2 able for purcha 
_ PY: Acock, 13 Star Lane, iS Mey oa Kent BRS 31. E-mail: searene ; 


THE FERN GAZETTE : 


Rel oat aes 


2005 


eta ts 5 


; and Population structure in 
Racer pers Periph) 
205-215