Monitoring at the New London Disposal Site
1992-1998
Volume |
Disposal Area
Monitoring System
DAMOS
pcre ete ne RIT LSID Sm |
. — ies
fx . re Ne” f x fi
payer a ot ATM
k ‘Y A A FX \ HN 2 i rei :
\ i B fe \ | ; Vis |
thas BNE 3
nhic Inston |
iY) looas Hol ste J} \\C \siituten |
4 WYOQUS bs eG
Bale rETPETED
: amino ial
Peer
D A|M O §
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING SYSTEM
Contribution 128
January 2001
(“es my Corps
gineers @
(84 England District
bot Ff
no. Z&
; Form approved
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB Ne O02 O1RE
Public reporting concern for the collection of information is estimated to avelare 1 hour per persons including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and measuring data needed and correcting and reviewing the collection of
information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information includin SURGE SHOns
efferson
for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate tor Information Observations and Records, 1216
Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Support.
1. AGENCY USE ONLY (LEAVE BLANK) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND
January 2001 DATES Final Report
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Monitoring at the New London Disposal Site 1992-1998 Volume I 6. FUNDING NUMBERS
6. AUTHORS Suis F 5
Science Applications International Corporation
7. PERFROMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING
Science Applications International Corporation ORGANIZATION REPORT
221 Third Street
Newport, RI 02840 SAIC No. 515
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAMES(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/
US Army Corps of Engineers-New England District MONITORING AGENCY
696 Virginia Rd DAMOS Contribution
Concord, MA 01742-2751 Number 128
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Available from : DAMOS PROGRAM MANAGER Regulatory Branch, USACE-NAE
696 Virginia Rd
oncord MA _01742-
12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAIABILTY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE
Approved for public release; distribution unlimited
13. ABSTRACT
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) conducted monitoring surveys of the New London Disposal Site (NLDS) in August, 1992; August, 1995;
September, 1997; and July, 1998, as part of the Disposal Area Monitoring System (DAMOS) Program. Field operations in each survey year included data
collection of one or more of the following: precisionbathymetric surveys, Remote Ecological Monitoring of the Seafloor (REMOTS) sediment-profile surveys, and
surface and near-bottom dissolved oxygen determinations. Since its inception in 1977, the Disposal Area Monitoring System (DAMOS) Program has investigated
dredging and dredged material disposal practices in an effort to minimize adverse physical, chemical, and biological impacts. DAMOS utilizes a flexible, tiered
management approach centered around comprehensive environmental monitoring to oversee the placement of sediments at nine open water disposal sites along the
coast of New England. Active disposal sites are surveyed on a regular basis to ensure the effects of dredged material disposition on the benthic habitat are localized
and temporary. There has been an active dredged material disposal site near New London since at least 1955. DAMOS monitoring of the New London Disposal
Site started in 1977 when the program was established. In 1996, the boundary of the New London Disposal Site shown in DAMOS graphics was shifted in
accordance with the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, resulting in a 0.2 nmi northerly shift of the disposal site. The new, northern region was
surveyed in 1997.
The New London disposal site has been used for on-going disposal throughout the 1990’s, including unconfined disposal of suitable sediments, and capped disposal
of unsuitable sediments. This report, Volume I, summarizes the disposal and monitoring activities conducted from the 1991-1992 dredging season through
monitoring in July, 1998. This information is presented as a single report to provide a clear, concise picture of use of the New London Disposal Site during this
time-frame and to include important monitoring information related to the dredged material mounds. Additional disposal and monitoring information related to the
U.S. Navy Seawolf Mound during this time period are to be presented in Volume II.
During the 1991-1992 disposal season, the NLDS received a total barge volume of 104,200 m3 of dredged material generated from four separate projects in the
eastern Long Island Sound region. Disposal resulted in creation of two disposal mounds, the Dow/Stonington (D/S) mound, consisting of unsuitable dredged
material (Dow and Stonington sediments) and suitable cap material (Dow sediments), and the NL-91 mound immediately north of the D/S mound.
Bathymetric surveys and REMOTS data, which were fully developed using pre- and post-capbathymetric survey data analyzed in 1994-1995, showed that due to
errors in navigation, while some cap material covered the D/S mound, most of the cap material was deposited approximately 250 m east of the mound. Following
the misplacement of some of the cap material, additional cap material has been deposited at the site as it becomes available, to steadily increase cap thickness over
the mound. REMOTS surveys of the D/S mound conducted in 1992, 1995, 1997, and 1998, showed no adverse impactstrong signs of benthic community
recovery and the continued presence of a stable benthic community, minimizing concem about potential adverse effects. During the 1994-1995 dredging season,
two new capped mounds were created at the NLDS, including the U.S. Coast Guard Academy (USCGA) mound, and New London 1994 (NL-94) mound.
Although monitoring in August, 1995, indicated the NLDS area was experiencing low oxygen bottom waters, it appeared to be part of a regional, seasondlypoxia
event that is unrelated to dredged material disposal. The benthic community at the newly formed disposal mounds was comparable to the reference areas.
Additional disposal activities conducted at the New London Disposal Site during this time frame consist of creation of thSeawolf mound with sediments from the
New London Naval Submarine Base, the Thames River navigational channel, and two smaller dredging projects. Monitoring of this mound conducted in 1997 and
1998 is discussed in Volume II.
14. SUBECT TERMS 15.NUMBER OF PAGES
New London Disposal Site oR OD
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION }19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ]20.LIMITATION OF
UNCLASSIFIED OF THIS PAGE ABSTRACT
A meainsy te erin bemanannallieetibie be GR thn iatt le htt (a hie WANs
Iyrrpilc abies ies: + india Areatlgrecre sey
|
ae ae a (aan ae S Rais Ny aaa i
in teal Pe: rs GAD Ryd gui Di
ff bs .
raul pn
© fae g
g
peti Loa halts ayia
(C4 he i
Da oes) tt Tepe tt
‘guts FPR a
6 “dioteepc sui essa
: me a i oY vie a, ‘s iene ali Whe Ep
dps Haren iin see ernie pe ear ls Qh lores ae Fe ae oe . fn
‘Sh OD we wt ay
gael Aci at NE alae i a SRN ald NM Gi a a
Any Py eh ey
Bd, SOK Uleatnid (Be, TR ane ean amb sale cabs he ager
we Babiuls sia vy Bin Lins ae, r on9 Lavi
an sei i
met. r. spre Bathed | wai we
ir a ee jes i she 9
tm,
apie
ce
y
ly
2 “yale. joealonbtl
; . ‘ tee marer i in ines 4 Hii
; Rew. uh gintarag eA % uhh of eel att maka £
ce aimed Ob: nite Male oink A na Ee
et en le a ny
2 ie ak:
MONITORING AT THE
NEW LONDON DISPOSAL SITE
1992-1998
VOLUME I
CONTRIBUTION #128
January 2001
Report No.
SAIC-515
Submitted to:
Regulatory Branch
New England District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
696 Virginia Road
Concord, MA 01742-2751
Submitted by:
Science Applications International Corporation
Admiral’s Gate
221 Third Street,
Newport, RI 02840
(401) 847-4210
Te er engioars
01 0 New England District
eee
os
<=
_
ns
ene = a ye oe
7 naire: e) tontizannatel svi bom
1 or pancetta 7 tela Neds earning has lam apmagme mel aye:
net y ee rt my
SDA OviAOTIVOM Rie Gian
Te LAROTAIG AOUKON Wa ce Oke
PROT BOOK 8 PV 0 ie
LIMUIOV Oeste he dr laa
ie
6 Lo
asik MOLTUAATAOD
(008 igimuniwt
Gest EN ee
BAAR Ate ieti © ren A
mee
4]
5)
“oh holtindue
chuslinedl euntabienesl
ioiverd Buslgadt veh
predeign’ Jo vaio vm, 2 gy
ees aisigh Bey
ae TSObF TO AM Joon
pr anemia.
there" Reateay, |
a ier
Oh igi
| en
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
IST OR MAB IEE Senet ele wel tees wc camila cg caicincie oo aaa Motte EN TEM RAN eae Vv
METS TOES EGR Sooo ge sass accra cai c ate la CES Tas ETE Ae cic ein (cine ofc Meiofherond sieiscie oe Soc Vil
EOE COMIVESWOMIMAIR YI renee ee eee en beens toes chu yaaiuucan aenaeeesene hoo ce de eale canoes X11
(PORe IN ROD WEDIONis:<satets ca teerel reeeeenrshotny seas nieeinces a Sham een gE. iN) 1
islerres BackSroundts.ye saere: Meee ae neat em emer: Neer ola nae Me te Mi slalaatelctnen saiciie te 1
1225 DredgedyMaterialDisposaliMounds! ie 0 rr ho. ocsoneeeee ees eee dad oe ccese 6
1.2.1 Dow/Stonington and 1991-1992 Disposal Activity .....................55 6
122-2 WSCGAtand NE-94*Disposal*Mounds 2.2 esc se. cece eos coece see se cence 9
ied iets Monitoring Activity crestassnteescensaret see eset ee ee rete Pete ee tas ae tee dee os 10
1.351 August 1992-MonitonmnetSurveye 1 ce ene cee nes eee 10
eS eZ Ausust 1995) Monitoring * Survey >... ce--ccensences sss cess ceeeses 11
1.3.3 Septembers1997/ Monitoring*Survicy -..--e.-te erate cecessecesn cece 12
1.3.4 Julyst99S MonitorimoeSurveyeerses-sacceseeeerees cose seen 12
1.3.5 NEDSiNorthermmRegione ees. ta. 2. see Peet acne cee aoe 13
CAO mare VUE HODS» sso sndasdncsscedsscaseeress ceaenee een et Se se ee ht 22 EE Ee et Os eH 14
Dals.>iBathymetryvand Navigation tests 10 Say se ee NEA RO ceeds 14
Drslesl 1992 and 995) SurveyPActivityseess.- meee cee seco: 16
BMP LOO Trandal99 SeSurviey VACVity ens s..2.22-cchaeee eos ces cose cee 16
213 Bathymetric’ Data Collections... 2e: 29 sees eee sce oes sees I)
2.1.4 Bathymetric! DatavProcessingeies.........cc0seeet es <ccuce seca ence 21
22 Ss REMOMS2 Sediment Profile Photosraphy ses... 04-4. 5-2e desks see eee 22
Dre l| NL-91 and the Dow/Stonington (D/S) Mound Complex...... 28
Did WSEGAGMoundiss a snes rete sa SED, WIRE Menta 28
2223 INDG-94 sMoundascsesctrstvcnns sss Rite MELONI: or MARS hs 28
2.2.4 IN@nthermiRe gion ie eee aes asain: aactiae ein sateen sais 33
Dood) INE DS ReferencerATcas serie cance cancer er aanen saecucnsteds 35
DPS DiSsolved(@xy cen’ Sampling ea crc cn tee acetic omen renee ser ec ae ses eee iaes 40
SAO pee SWI exert anct ieee au eee ca kuna ek AIOE Pad eB. Bele oo 44
31.) D/Sand NEE-91- Disposal Moumds)jucsyssecinsccse terres esos s foe vec nsees 44
So dbedl Bathiy ine try ectosteces Myton tag Be Mane ene Ne eh 0 ORM wo 44
Sele REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography ...................... 48
SallePo il AUISUS HOOD SUIVCN et Renee ee on edie en ueniatan ek 55
Dolla PUISUSHMS ISIS UI Cyrene cece eercn ech nee. 67
SeleeS Septembers | OO/eSuivieyeeecere sere ee meee ere eeene 76
4.0
5.0
6.0
3.1.2.4 July PISO SIS URVEVERS Ec cccsoscc cece cate ees 82
Sales August 1992 Dissolved Oxygen Measurements................. 90
3.2. MSCGA Disposal Mounderstecgeut ic saccunes cnee ean ace seeee Re see ce eeeRC ERE 90
8) o745 Bathy me they 22. osceisr cag tltenes sone ons mereeen eee en amen eens 90
Seed REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography ...................... 90
3:3).«+++NIL-94+ Disposal Mounds cetetern ies cic seis aeeehe en memes ame tte enema nie seem eran 98
Sosiell Bathy me try ini sae asics tine tect wel se ctuuct emcee ganas seeee enerraener 98
3532 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography ...................... 98
JoSo/Aadh August 1995 Survey 222. - shes. eee ec eee eee ee 98
Soeur September 99/eSunveyere cress teeeneeeee eee eeeere ree 106
3:4. NorthemoResion . 55. eWeek sak ets cece tes cccan ee ee ea ee ey me eee 110
3.4.1 1997 Master Bathymetric Survey -.aecreesaee see eteee 110
3.4.2 NEDS NorthernResionycc2et test focee een neon cee eee 115
3.4.2.1 Bathymetry).. tr¢:-ccavocsere ae vareele ot okte th cewoseoceeeee JUILS)
3.4.2.2 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography............ 115
3.5 .NIL-92 Disposal Mound... ..0..6.5.:.:52.o8 eA. meaatte A= ood cou 122
3:6 . NLDS Reference Areas; mtrcstewt QOS. sreceas Rone sce senate eton een eee tee 122
3.6.1 Augusiil92: Sutvey Boas. sascaqyed cn .0c. eR Me ace eunene 122
3-6-2 August, 1995, Surveyit. ssedasntsaees sc .cteo sue e tween osee- meee 125
32053 September 1997 -Surviey pects 2a tea sassse Bee ee aeeeeeeee eee 128
3.6.4 July 1998) Survey pxceten 5 RETO 3. cetec ee Ramsden cceneceeaee 129
DISCUSSION ..ochce esis betec oi escsts pheeclooe yee ueeceasysea ease ussee eee eee eee eee 133
4.1 Topography and Evidence of Historical Disposal at the NLDS............. 133
4.2 Biological Response to Disposal at the NLDS ........................ sce ee eee 134
4.2.1 Evidence of Low Dissolved Oxygen ...................2.---+++ 136
4.3 Capping of the Dow/Stonington Disposal Mound.........................0555 138
4.3.1 Benthic-Recolonizationsse-eese soca tebe eee 138
A322. Sediment Distribution and Characterization................... 139
4.3. WSCGAIMOound watnasnase vscadh sas. byet: OT. coccite ene fe Miekeemcesedaees 141
4.5 NL-94 Mound)... o.oo. 5 3c. cece Berea REVO ON «ores tic see ane ets cee cen eee 144
4.6. Northern Regions. .2.0 5.22. caco 3 Pee BS I as incl ee cera ee reese 146
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................2 sce eeeeeeee eens 148
5.1 “Overview of Monitoring sis. 2s. vasecsecea cae scene acces ee ee 148
5.2 Dow/Stonington and NL-91 Mound........................2..200 wel oka Nae - 149
5.3) JUS@GA Mound 2 cece yatta eee tan ener ec ae ee 150
5.4. NL-94 Mound «02.2 ck see ete Seen Ree Sears RR Oe Sng 151
5.5... Northerm Region. 0... cae eas ana: 5 eer eee ices Ue eT Mares arene 151
5:6 Recommendations <i .tt 2n4 eg eee ee oe osc est oteri nee enecrasie 151
REFERENCES 030.25 oo ocadsgna jeer Slee Taue aula Bee oe oe Oe ER eee ee 153
ii
APPENDICES
INDEX
| 4 s ae pekews pi ne ee ToT. riaetnaah
— a Z } iu } Bocrviwery:: ay a eh A eave one ‘i Hee Be a
a. i _ REMOTS® Seanine Pre phy
| a2 -
=a) | os. ow i heal
Vy ee REMOTS?S Sede ee ay
. ah i wen
. Sa , Mathie Rages Mee eet Oe ye jWheis renee y/
P 4 ee aera 2 Vi c ee *
~~ i pee Pad
ey ever
ee ee hat ; OTS? So Stile Ph
7 ‘i vs Nie Rees fing 44
_ , - haa iy i _ Agnes F992, Srinvey pai :
ee eae AOR Aint N85 Supteey co.
ne 2 (963 _) . Sepeembar 1997 Survey 1 ie
aft = Sora! on 3.6 a Ck ee ee ay
: : ‘ died Gadi nhs ‘ rine | SCiannse Ras ewe
a ‘4d Tapogs ue cama Risenetaa DE
a i Us a. Biotopinal, Tempore tn, bi pan Ni
prong, asldaune
PORIWE 0 oe Cale eres
Table 2-1)
Table 2-2.
Table 2-3.
Table 2-4.
Table 2-5.
Table 2-6.
Table 2-7.
Table 2-8.
Table 2-9.
Table 3-1.
Table 3-2.
Table 3-3.
Table 3-4.
Table 3-5.
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Summary of Bathymetry and REMOTS® Surveys conducted at NLDS
1OGDE TOO Sie tes Verena hs Secret) Wee oun eee eok a MeN eee eR cae diate dbroeiws 15
Summary of Survey Equipment Employed by SAIC for Bathymetric
SurveyscateNE DS pet see ARES RII NPIS PUR, wo acesle ale eile LW,
GraimySize\ScalesbionjSediments beeen aaetaeteae see eee eee seer eerste 25
Calculation of REMOTS® Organism Sediment Index Value................... Pay
Coordinates of REMOTS® Sampling Stations at the D/S Mound over the
perlodsl!992-1998 wa) aise. Deenelee ey tae Aes. eke. Ssh Sack Cen Ms)
USCGA Mound REMOTS® Stations Coordinates...............2..ececeeeee eee 34
NL-94 Mound REMOTS® Stations Coordinates...............2.2:.ececeeeeeeees 35
New London Disposal Site Northern Region REMOTS® Stations
Coordinates i ees we PA ee ee ona ety DOTS SG 36
NLDS Reference Areas REMOTS® Stations Coordinates....................-- 43
NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex REMOTS® Sediment-Profile
Photography Results Summary for the 1992 Survey ........................0255 56
NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex REMOTS® Sediment-Profile
Photography Results Summary for the 1995 Survey .........................05. 68
NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex REMOTS® Sediment-Profile
Photography Results Summary for the 1997 Survey .........................045 Wd
NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex REMOTS®Sediment-Profile
Photography Results Summary for the 1997 and 1998 Surveys............... 86
USCGA REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography Results Summary
FOTGthE MOSSES uv eN ee eee as Pee eee caste tee da eect one el avocutstlsidersaoece 95
Table 3-6.
Table 3-7.
Table 3-8.
Table 3-9.
Tabie 3-10.
Table 3-11.
Table 3-12.
LIST OF TABLES (continued)
NL-94 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography Results Summary
Foye Wot MSIE) SUIQKENY coa0gc500259003 98 pdosabos cuocob cocoa nsogoocosacusacoascane.
NL-94 Disposal Mound REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Results Summary for the 1997 Survey ..............20.ssseeeeee scene eee ees
NLDS Northern Region REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Results Summary for the 1997 Survey .............-.seeseeeees ee ee eee ees
NLDS Reference Area REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Results Summary for the 1992 Survey ...............:.2seseeeseee eee ee ees
NLDS Reference Area REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Results Summary for the 1995 Survey ...............:.s esses eceee scene ees
NLDS Reference Area REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Results Summary for the 1997 Survey .............-::e:eeeeeeeeeeeee nsec ees
NLDS Reference Area REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Results Summary for 1997 and 1998 Surveys............-.-.0::sseeeeeeee
Vi
Figure 1 -1.
Figure 1-2.
igune—3)
Figure 2-1.
Figure 2-2.
Figure 2-3.
Figure 2-4A.
Figure 2-4B.
Figure 2-5.
Figure 2-6.
Figure 2-7.
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
LocationiofitheiNew Wondon’Disposal’Site 2 takes. este cscs esac ec aa 2
Bathymetric chart of New London Disposal Site .....................cceeeeee eee 5)
Timeline of disposal and monitoring activity...................ccee eee ee eee ee ee ees V
Location of the 1992 and 1995 bathymetric survey area over NLDS,
relative to the disposal site boundaries, analysis areas for individual
mounds, and the New York and Connecticut State Line (NAD 27).......... 18
Location of the 1997 master bathymetric survey area over NLDS,
relative to the disposal site boundaries and the New York and Connecticut
Statevleines (NAD SS) yee ae teh HATE BD EE a 20
Schematic diagram of Benthos, Inc. Model 3731 REMOTS®
sediment-profile camera and sequence of operation on deployment.......... 23
Distribution of the 1992 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations
(41) over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the DAMOS
disposal site boundary and the U.S. Navy submarine corridor................ 30
Distribution of 1995, 1997, and 1998 REMOTS® sediment-profile
photography stations (13) over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex,
relative to disposal site boundary and the U.S. Navy submarine corridor...31
Distribution of 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations
(13) over the USCGA mound, relative to the detectable margins of the
mounds: se 4.9 eee lowah Bo. esete eee Be SA SEMIS. fo ocd ac ees Sy
Distribution of 1995 and 1997 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography
stations (13) over the NL-94 mound, relative to the detectable margins
olstheimounde age hem We, SSRI) Oh) Fe SEUSS Sh RARE BeraBtarsctot in 50/0 Shy
Distribution of 1997 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations
(11) over the Northern Region, relative to the FPEIS disposal site
boundary and historic disposal mounds ......................ceceeeeee eee eee eee 38
vii
Figure 2-8.
Figure 2-9.
Figure 3-1.
Figure 3-2.
Figure 3-3.
Figure 3-4.
Figure 3-5.
Figure 3-6.
Figure 3-7.
Figure 3-8.
LIST OF FIGURES (continued)
Page
Location of the NLDS reference areas and distribution 1992 reference
area REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations (39), relative to the
NLDS site boundaries and New York-Connecticut State Line ................ 39
Locations selected for water column (CTD) profiles, as well as near surface
and near bottom water samples for dissolved oxygen concentrations during
therAugustl992siieldioperations, 5: s-eetes ests teas tesa crac tere siete 41
Bathymetric contour plot of the 1600 m x 1600 m survey area over the New
London Disposal Site, August 1992. A 0.25 m contour interval shows
current/and!relic disposal!mounds' se5 sist eet. ae. nee soe eet total ctor ero toate 45
Bathymetric contour plot of depth differences between the June 1991 and
August 1992 surveys in the vicinity of the Dow/Stonington mound, complete
with plotted positions of the 1991-1992 disposal buoys, 0.1 m contour
interval), depth im Meters eM es SA I ie eee aae toes «cols eles else 46
Bathymetric contour plot of the 940 m x 840 m survey conducted at the
New London Disposal Site by Ocean Surveys Inc., in December 1991, 0.5
MMCONtOUPMNtERVAL ISS LINE RL Ee MOEA OE SP LEE MIEELY oer ola to reloleevet 47
Bathymetric contour plot of the June 1991 survey conducted by SAIC,
regridded to a 500 m X 670 m analysis area, 0.5 m contour interval, depth
in MEtEES VYRVYE ocd SU. DOD IBIS Se EROS OF SIRS oo ccsivace ctor 49
Bathymetric contour plot of the depth differences between the SAIC June
1991 and OSI December 1991 surveys showing accumulation of dredged
material at the precap stage of development, 0.2 m contour interval......... 50
Bathymetric contour plot of the August 1992 survey conducted by SAIC,
regridded to a 500 m X 670 m analysis area, 0.5 m contour interval, depth
TTACLERS 3 ses seed axedoo sda ard eneetin ah ga ke 1 Me ato: Souk
Bathymetric contour plot of the depth differences between the SAIC
August 1992 and OSI December 1991 surveys showing accumulation of
CDM at the postcap stage of development, 0.2 m contour interval .......... 52,
Depth difference comparison displaying the sediment deposited during the
1991-92 disposal! SUTVEY acc.) betes tee tack eects einemee ee econ eee eee pectenee 53
Vill
Figure 3-9,
Figure 3-10.
Figure 3-11.
Figure 3-12.
Figure 3-13.
Figure 3-14.
Figure 3-15.
Figure 3-16.
Figure 3-17.
Figure 3-18.
Figure 3-19.
LIST OF FIGURES (continued)
Page
Bathymetric contour plot of the depth difference between the SAIC
August 1992 and SAIC June 1991 surveys showing total accumulation of
dredged material within the 500 m X 670 m analysis area, 0.2 m contour
TINGE RV alle eerste ene etn rao man a the Nea Mir ay mere dR Nuh ltl 54
Distribution map of surface sediment type over fresh and/or historic
dredged material in the vicinity of the new NL-91 and D/S mound
COMplexqawNED Sew BAF ASE I ee nn USE arti e 57
Contour lines based on sediment stratigraphy as detected with REMOTS®
sediment-profilesphotograplhyss: eye. tee eon eee eae eee ae ee ea eeie cosine eee 58
REMOTS® photograph of Station 200S depicting a sand layer over fresh
dredgedimatenal lane a eceesae: 3c bos puonGugpoUUoDgadapb.scseouse bsoenoc a OF Sy)
REMOTS® photograph of Station 300SE depicting a layer of biologically
reworked dredged material over fresh dredged material ....................... 60
Spatial distribution of the major modal grain size for the 1992 REMOTS®
sediment-profile photography stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound
COMPLE Ke item ed AEN corey Male peters apmuternnet ORE NC BREE SC IE wes os 61
REMOTS® photograph of Station 400S depicting a layer of pebble and
Shellfoverreworkedidredgedimatenial es-eseeae corres eee ene eee: 63
Spatial distribution of Redox Potential Discontinuity depths for the 1992
REMOTS® stations on the disposal mound....................0ecccceeeceeeeeeees 64
Spatial distribution map of successional stage status for the NL-91 and
DiSmmound complex, 17. yawes winery SUE wets enn. Daten ok eae 65
REMOTS® photograph of Station 600SE depicting a healthy Stage II
community consisting of the tube-dwelling amphipod Ampelisca sp.
necolonizingsetreshydred gedjmateriall Pereeere ees aha Nis ee ee 66
Distribution map of Organism Sediment Index (OSI) values over the
NL-91 and D/S mound complex as detected in the August 1992 REMOTS®
sediment-protile) photography ssunveyias.cene we sa. Rees Wedd eee. on. 2. - 69
Figure 3-20.
Figure 3-21.
Figure 3-22.
Figure 3-23.
Figure sage
Figure 3-25.
Figure 3-26.
Figure 3-27.
Figure 3-28.
Figure 3-29.
LIST OF FIGURES (continued)
Page
Mean dredged material thickness at 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile
photography stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to
theyAugusHHll992idetectablesmancinsys-ces aes eee ne receta sees eee 70
REMOTS® photographs of Station 200S depicting a layer of pebble and
shell\oversreworked| dredgedimatertaliysaas athe a ceee eee eee eee i
Spatial distribution of mean redox potential discontinuity depths over the
NL-91 and D/S mound complex as detected by the 1995 REMOTS®
sediment-profile photography survey, relative to the 1992 detectable
Margins, of; the pmMOunG 4. sserssissasNceset AML St eles pps eed Ee ee 73
REMOTS photographs showing Stage II on Stage III at (A) CTR and
Stage I on III at (B) 200N on the D/S Mound .........................ceeeee eee 74
Spatial distribution map of successional stage status for the August 1995
REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations occupied over the
NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the detectable margins of the
MOUs 9223 WHELs CSOSA Seay OTR hes tna tay ae Pepi Hace nel on, DE, meni 75
1997 REMOTS® images from Stations 200E (A) and 200W (B) depicting
dredged material layering and medium-grained sand in the surface layer,
respectively a.yiin:agola WN CGR Je, deme eenintepelis Sa tee ME le oly ed mam 78
1997 REMOTS® images collected at the NL-91 and D/S mound compiex
Stations 100S (A) and 200S (B) displaying a surface layer of pebbles over
reworked dredged material (9.09). ss ere ee eee cao ier os 79
Distribution map of mean RPD (red) and median OSI (blue) values
calculated for the 1997 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex,
relative tothe: 1992 disposal mound! footprint 3-445 saseseee ese eect 80
Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1997 survey over
the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the 1992 disposal mound
LOOUPLINE cys2reqonck AQUI. Trap emb eee. OLN eter diane ee ne errs anaes Aeneas pate aie 81
Evidence of recently disposed capping dredged material (CDM) over the
NE-91 and, D/S;mound complexe erase react eee er eee eee eee re eee. eee 83
' Figure 3-30.
Figure 3-31.
Figure 3-32.
Figure 3-33.
Figure 3-34.
Figure 3-35.
Figure 3-36.
Figure 3-37.
Figure 3-38.
Figure 3-39.
Figure 3-40.
LIST OF FIGURES (continued)
Page
CDM disposal locations and projected footprint of new dredged material
on the seafloor vs. depth of new material at REMOTS® stations over the
IN-Silvand: D/Ssmoundicomplex says. rasebete. ete ene eae. cue naan se gene 84
REMOTS® photograph of Station 200S depicting a layer of pebble and
shellvoverneworkedidredsedimaterial ra. -ceces-eecase eee ee neenceen cence 87
Distribution map of mean RPD (red) and median OSI (blue) values
calculated for the 1998 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex,
relative to the 1992 disposal mound footprint and the predicted footprint of
new material deposited during the 1997-98 disposal season ................... 88
Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1998 survey over
the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the 1992 disposal mound
footprint and the predicted footprint of new material deposited during the
ISOF-OSidisposalsseasons ees. so asee Seca sees eee. NactaaeA Adc .8 SEEN. 89
Bathymetric chart of the 1600 m x 1600 m survey area, August 1995
LESUICS OF SeMa CONLOUMAIMUCTAV Aly. wane. eernes eee eee te eee ean Ee eee ee 91
Depth difference plot displaying the location of the disposal mounds
created since the August 1992 survey (USCGA, NL-94, and NL-92)
relative toyiStoricmisposal mounds ane ee eee eee eee eee 92
USCGA mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995,
OMAemkContourminte eval HI SSL SIR FP aN Renee, 08 Lee We, A 93
Distribution map of mean RPD and median OSI values calculated for
theslS9sysunvevrovertheiWSCGA Mound eye. sesseeceee estes eee nice 96
Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1995 survey
overthe WS CGAIM ound: Wee ARG SN Ps TONES Lose ea ee SAS OF)
NL-94 mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995,
OFZ smc OMtOUTH IML Walbs saa eastractact tarda desl deletes tee As ease vole dc ace dae on 99
REMOTS® images obtained from NL-94 Station 15ONW (A) and 1
50SE (B) depicting ambient sediment and reworked historic dredged
IMATE HIAlS TESPSCLEVEL YA ais muerte cle ck eetn nie, ne meoninls, SACOM OAL ANCIRINS, 4
xi
Figure 3-41.
Figure 3-42.
Figure 3-43.
Figure 3-44.
Figure 3-45.
Figure 3-46.
Figure 3-47.
Figure 3-48.
Figure 3-49.
Figure 3-50.
Figure 3-51.
Figure 3-52.
Figure 3-53.
Figure 3-54.
LIST OF FIGURES (continued)
Page
Mean dredged material thickness at the 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile
photography stations over the NL-94 mound....................eseseeeeeeeee es 103
Distribution map of mean RPD and median OSI values calculated for the
1995 survey over the NL-94 Mound ................... cece cee ece scence eee seh 104
Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1997 survey
overithie INI294) Mouma ie sig 10 Seer ie ek Tals ACS, SRN Aa 105
Interpretive map and example image (100NW) showing stations over the NL-
94 mound displaying ambient sediments in 1995 which had received fresh
dredged material during the 1996-97 disposal season.......................55 108
REMOTS® images obtained from NL-94 Station 150SE (A), SONW
(B), and 50S (C) depicting shell armoring........................cceeeee eee ee es 109
Distribution map of mean RPD and median OSI values calculated for the
1.997 ‘surveysover the NIZ-94 Mounds: 35-2eeeeeeeeseeeenee eee eate-ea eee 111
Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1997 survey
over. the INL-94, Motimdys! ies sie beet gs Cs Wyeth gee ok Eee nel 112
Bathymetric chart of New London Disposal Site ....................:.0eee0ees 113
Three-dimensional view of the bathymetry of NLDS (vertical
exaggeration, 37/25) Aeh sana dee eee eee ee eeaeeee er eceer ec eeen 114
Depth difference between the 1986 and 1997 master bathymetric surveys 117
September 1997 bathymetry of the Northern Region .......................55
Distribution of RPD and OSI values over the Northern region of NLDS - 120
Distribution of successional stage assemblages over the Northern region
(0) (16) DS ee ne Re EMER ER HOMERS aE Wiricvogdue asoaconmecastascanuenouaaosan 121
NL-92 mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995,
O} 2m contourntenvala: erties crpicteres: see AS RO rstsctonicicioe 124
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) conducted monitoring
surveys of the New London Disposal Site (NLDS) in August 1992; August 1995;
September 1997; and July 1998, as part of the Disposal Area Monitoring System
(DAMOS) Program. Field operations in each survey year included data collection of one
or more of the following: precision bathymetric surveys, Remote Ecological Monitoring
of the Seafloor (REMOTS®) sediment-profile surveys, and surface and near-bottom
dissolved oxygen determinations.
Since its inception in 1977, the Disposal Area Monitoring System (DAMOS)
Program has investigated dredging and dredged material disposal practices in an effort to
minimize adverse physical, chemical, and biological impacts. DAMOS utilizes a flexible,
tiered management approach centered around comprehensive environmental monitoring to
oversee the placement of sediments at nine open water disposal sites along the coast of
New England. Active disposal sites are surveyed on a regular basis to ensure the effects of
dredged material disposition on the benthic habitat are localized and temporary.
There has been an active dredged material disposal site near New London since at
least 1955. DAMOS monitoring of the New London Disposal Site started in 1977 when
the program was established. In 1996, the boundary of the New London Disposal Site
shown in DAMOS graphics was shifted in accordance with the Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement, resulting in a 0.2 nmi northerly shift of the disposal site.
The new, northern region was surveyed in 1997.
The New London disposal site has been used for on-going disposal throughout the
1990’s, including unconfined disposal of suitable sediments, and capped disposal of
unsuitable sediments. This report summarizes the disposal and monitoring activities
conducted from the 1991-1992 dredging season through monitoring in July 1998. This
information is presented as a single report to provide a clear, concise picture of use of the
New London Disposal Site during this time frame and to include important monitoring
information related to the dredged material mounds.
During the 1991-1992 disposal season, the NLDS received a total barge volume of
104,200 m? of dredged material generated from four separate projects in the eastern Long
Island Sound region. Disposal resulted in creation of two disposal mounds, the
Dow/Stonington (D/S) mound, consisting of unsuitable dredged material (Dow and
Stonington sediments) and suitable cap material (Dow sediments), and the NL-91 mound
immediately north of the D/S mound.
Bathymetric surveys and REMOTS® data, which were fully developed using pre-
and post-cap bathymetric survey data analyzed in 1994-1995, showed that due to errors in
navigation, while some cap material covered the D/S mound, most of the cap material was
Xili
deposited approximately 250 m east of the mound. Following the misplacement of some of
the cap material, additional cap material has been deposited at the site as it becomes
available, to steadily increase cap thickness over the mound. REMOTS® surveys of the
D/S mound conducted in 1992, 1995, 1997, and 1998, showed no adverse impacts, strong
signs of benthic community recovery, and the continued presence of a stable benthic
community.
During the 1994-1995 dredging season, two new capped mounds were created at the
NLDS, including the U.S. Coast Guard Academy (USCGA) mound, and New London
1994 (NL-94) mound. Although monitoring in August, 1995, indicated the NLDS area
was experiencing low oxygen bottom waters, it appeared to be part of a regional, seasonal
hypoxia event that is unrelated to dredged material disposal. The benthic community at the
newly formed disposal mounds was comparable to the reference areas. The NL-94 cap
was augmented with additional material during the 1996-97 disposal season, and healthy
benthic recolonization was evident by the September 1997, surveys.
Additional disposal activities conducted at the New London Disposal Site during
this time frame consist of creation of the Seawolf Mound with sediments from the New
London Naval Submarine Base, the Thames River navigational channel, and two smaller
dredging projects. Monitoring of this mound conducted in 1997 and 1998 is discussed in a
separate DAMOS report.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes disposal and monitoring activities conducted at the New
London Disposal Site (NLDS) from the 1991-1992 dredging season through monitoring in
July 1998. This information is presented as a single report to provide a clear, concise
picture of use of the New London Disposal Site during this time frame and to include
important monitoring information related to the dredged material mounds. This report
(Volume I) covers all disposal, monitoring and management activities at the NLDS over
the indicated period except those associated with the U.S. Navy Seawolf mound, which
will be presented separately in Volume II.
1.1 Background
Monitoring of the impacts associated with the subaqueous disposal of sediments
dredged from harbors, inlets, and bays in the New England region has been overseen by
the Disposal Area Monitoring System (DAMOS) Program since its inception in 1977. The
goals of the DAMOS Program pertain to detailed investigation and reduction of any
adverse physical, chemical, and biological effects on the benthic environment associated
with dredged material disposal activities. The activity sponsored by DAMOS helps to
ensure that the effects of sediment deposition over pre-defined areas of seafloor are local
and temporary. A flexible, tiered management protocol is applied in the long-term
monitoring of sediment disposal at ten open-water dredged material disposal sites along the
coast of New England (Germano et al. 1994).
There has been an active dredged material disposal site near New London since at
least 1955. Disposal activity was focused on 19 disposal sites in Long Island Sound (LIS)
until the mid-1970s, when they were reduced to four regional sites, including New London
(Fredette et al. 1993). The Navy began detailed environmental assessment of the New
London site in 1973 (U.S. Navy 1973, 1975). In 1977, the DAMOS Program assumed the
monitoring responsibility for active disposal sites in New England including the New
London Disposal Site (NLDS).
The New London Disposal Site (NLDS) is an active open-water dredged material
disposal site located 5.38 km (3.1 nmi) south of Eastern Point, Groton, Connecticut. This
site has been monitored under the DAMOS Program since 1977 (NUSC 1979; Figure 1-1).
Centered at 41° 16.306’ N, 72° 04.571° W (NAD 83), the 3.42 km? NLDS has water
depths which range from 14 m over the NL-RELIC Mound to 24 m at the southern
disposal site boundary.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
New London, Connecticut
NEW LONDON
New London Disposal Site ve
NAD 83
WATERFORD
2
New London
Disposal Site
‘WEST REFe
Historic Site
Boundary
Se
os
lS
a a ~€ ee f
le
| LONG ISLAND SOUND od
nee Block Island
fa) we sound
| 4-7 -\ Gardiners Bolere ie
| y eee CU) { “Wontauie
Lae ty NOSE ae <
A Z iS N Oy ¢ =< a PAs a |
Pod The or =n yess as MS \ Da 1
(eee la Eas Harnpton |
bea (es _--—__ Atlantic Ocean 4
Figure 1-1. Location of the New London Disposal Site
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
From 1977 to 1992, DAMOS conducted monitoring surveys based on a 1 nmi
(nautical mile) square disposal site centered at 41° 16.100' N, 72° 04.600' W (SAIC
1988). In 1982, the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (FPEIS) for the
disposal of dredged material in the LIS region recommended the continued use of the four
existing disposal sites in LIS, including New London (USACE 1982). These four sites had
been identified prior to the completion of the FPEIS by the Connecticut-New York Interim
Plan (NERBC 1980). The Interim Plan identified center coordinates for a slightly different
location (0.2 nmi due north of the DAMOS coordinates). As of 1 January 1996, DAMOS
adopted the new center coordinates as defined in the Interim Plan as 41° 16.300' N, 72°
04.600' W in North Atlantic Datum 1927 (NAD 27). It is unknown why the original
DAMOS center coordinates were not in agreement with the Interim Plan, but no projects
were directed to the southern edge of the site during this period, so the change has had no
effect on disposal site management or monitoring. This change corrects the slight
discrepancy and brings DAMOS in agreement with the FPEIS. Similar changes have been
made to the Central Long Island Sound Disposal Site and the Cornfield Shoals Disposal
Site.
The location of NLDS intersects with two important management boundaries: a
300-m wide submarine transit corridor; and the New York-Connecticut state boundary
(Figure 1-1). The submarine transit corridor has been established to minimize conflict
between submarine traffic to, and from, the submarine base in Groton, CT and disposal
buoys that may not be seen when submarines transit submerged. The state boundary
affects state regulatory authority under the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) and the
issuance of state water quality certification for disposal permits (Carey 1998). Under the
CZMA, states must concur that disposal activities in their state waters are consistent with
their federally approved Coastal Zone Management Plans before permits are issued by the
USACE.
The long-term observation of the effects of disposed dredged material is facilitated
by the construction of distinct sediment mounds within a disposal site. Development of
disposal mounds is achieved by directing barges to predetermined locations typically
marked by surface buoys, which have taut-line moorings to maximize position stability.
When necessary, mounds are constructed in phases to allow for capping of material
deemed unsuitable for open-water disposal. Capping is a subaqueous containment method
that utilizes material determined to be suitable for open-water disposal (hereafter referred
to as capping dredged material, or CDM) to overlay and isolate deposits of unacceptably-
contaminated dredged material (UDM) from the surrounding environment (Fredette 1994).
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
Recent disposal activity has been located to take advantage of the bottom
topography created by historical disposal mounds. Two management objectives have been
sought: creation of a “bowl” by placement of mounds in a “ring”; and constraint on the
spread of dredged material disposed at the site. The lateral spread of dredged material
disposed through the water column is strongly affected by bottom slope (Bokuniewicz et al.
1978). By placement of the taut-wire moored disposal buoys, disposal activity can be
directed to specific locations and thereby limit the horizontal spread of material by filling
depressions or confining material between adjacent, older mounds. Minimizing lateral
spreading of mounds can increase site capacity and reduce the volume of material required
for capping. Additionally, in order to reduce the potential effects of bottom currents and
storm-generated waves, sediment mounds at the NLDS are developed in a broad, flat
manner, maintaining a minimum water depth of 14 meters. This minimum depth also
allows for the safe passage of deep draft Navy vessels transiting through the disposal site
(NUSC 1979). Presently, there are 10 discernible mounds (NL-95 is merged with the
Seawolf Mound) within the boundaries of the disposal site (Figure 1-2).
The Thames River, located in southeastern Connecticut, discharges fresh water and
sediment from the interior of eastern Connecticut into Long Island Sound. The mile-wide
basin of the lower Thames River and New London Harbor is utilized by military,
commercial, and recreational vessels seeking protection from the open waters of Long
Island Sound (Figure 1-1). Maintenance dredging of New London Harbor and adjacent
coastal areas, overseen by the NAE, is required to insure navigable waterways and
adequate dockage for deep draft vessels. Most of the material generated from dredging
operations is transported by barge and deposited at the New London Disposal Site (NLDS)
in Long Island Sound.
Disposal of dredged material occurred within and around the NLDS area for a number
of years before the inception of the DAMOS Program. The formation of the NL-RELIC
Mound was a result of dredging and disposal of sediments from the Thames River and New
London Harbor prior to 1977 and during the early 1980s (NUSC 1979; SAIC et al. 1985).
The area surrounding the NLDS is subject to moderate to high bottom currents (maximum
bottom current of 55 cm-s”) relative to other containment disposal sites in Long Island Sound
(Waddell et al. 1999). However, the shelter provided by Fisher’s Island, the southern fork of
Long Island and the Connecticut shoreline protect the disposal site from the effects of major
storm waves. This inference is supported by the fact that many historic disposal mounds have
remained stable in both height and shape over at least ten years, and in some cases (such as
NL-RELIC) twenty years or more (Figure 1-2).
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
September 1997 Master Bathymetric Survey
41° 16.750° N
41° 16.250° N
41° 16.000° N
41° 15.750° N
NLDS
Depth in meters
NAD 83
Figure 1-2. Bathymetric chart of New London Disposal Site (contour interval = 0.25 m)
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
1.2 Dredged Material Disposal Mounds
In September 1997, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
conducted a master bathymetric survey at the NLDS (Figure 1-2). The master bathymetric
survey provides a reference frame for locating the disposal and monitoring activities
conducted from 1991-1998. For each mound complex, the disposal history will be
described followed by a summary of monitoring activities. A timeline of all of these
activities (Figure 1-3) has been provided to summarize the events; details of the survey
methods are provided in Section 2.0.
The September 1997 master bathymetric survey also marked the conversion from
the horizontal navigational reference system of the North American Datum of 1927 (NAD
27) to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) for all future bathymetric surveys
conducted at this site (see Methods section).
1.2.1 Dow/Stonington and 1991-1992 Disposal Activity
A series of buoy positions and disposal activities occurred between the fall of 1991
and spring of 1992 (Figure 1-3). These activities resulted in formation of a small, flat
mound complex (designated the New London-91 and Dow/Stonington mound complex)
that lies within the center of NLDS surrounded and protected by slightly higher mounds
(Figure 1-2). The surface of this mound complex shows little relief and has been
consistent in character throughout the six-year period covered by this report. Most of the
complex has an upper layer of sand mixed with shells and pebbles in some areas. This
surface has been rapidly colonized by a stable benthic community after each sequence of
disposal.
The history of disposal within this area is complicated and needs to be described in
detail before presenting the survey results. The taut-wired buoy "NDA" was first deployed
for the 1991-1992 disposal season by SAIC on 26 September 1991 at coordinates
41°16.239' N, 72°04.486' W (NDA #1; Figure 1-3).
The sediments deposited at the NDA buoy were dredged from the Gwen Mor
Marina in the Mystic River and Port Niantic, Inc. in the Niantic River. An estimated
barge volume of 5,700 m3 of dredged material was deposited in close proximity to the
NDA buoy before it was struck and dragged off-station by a U.S. Navy submarine
transiting through NLDS (Appendix A1).
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
AWAOV SULIO}UOW pue [esodsip Jo suT[OUN], «= *E-] DANS
(S/Q) 86/2 Divs ‘Buuojwow Sova
I (p6-IN ¥ S/Q) 26/6 : Olvs ‘Buuojuow SOWVG
(p6-1N 8 ‘VOOSN ‘Z6-IN ‘S/G) S6/8 Divs ‘Bunojuow SOWVGa
sfanins Divs ‘Buuowuow SoWva
Burojjuoy (sya) Le/zt | ISO BuyoyUop) punoyy
(punow yOOSN / Aong 99sSn) UO wad voosn
(punow) vOOsn / hong 99Sn)|,w oos'ey Hl wan v9osn
(punow) ¥6-"N / Aong ¥6-VGN) 4 00z'8z Wad S1ald AAeN SN
(puna y6-IN /Aong p6-VGN) ,w ooz's Sal WGN Slield Aen sn
(punoyy s/a) (punow Z6-1N / Aong cg-vaN) wScl's: levayew pebpesq 26-VON
cl OOL'E I c4000'€ | (puno| p6-IN / Aong 96-VaN) Wao euney Auey seep
406. (punow §/q) WG) anio jy9eA NessooauUaUS
420g onueIN
(punoy|s/q ) 4 1626S WO leowayD moq
(punow s/a / Aong gq) et! 6€0're | Wan leo1Weyo moq
jesodsigq jeuajey (punow s/q / Aong s/q) 4 S90'2! I Wan Joqe} uoj6u1u0}s
pabpeig. (pune L6-IN /Aong 16-VGN) ,W o6e's Mf Sul onueny Hod
(puino|W L6-1N /Aong 16-VGN) ,W 1Se'c MM } euew sowuemo
96-VON
U00r Hi (duran V6-IN / Aong evan
fong-99Sn
v6-VON
€6-QVN
Z6-VON
Aong-sa
juauAojdag ven
Aong £-L6-VON
c-L6-VGN
L-L6-VON
86-inr 26-994 $6190 v6-Aey e6-uer 16-das
AVA PUNOW 866L - L661
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 — 1998
On 27 November 1991, the NDA buoy was re-positioned at 41°16.251' N,
72°04.497' W (NDA #2). A second, smaller buoy, "D/S", was placed 175 m south of
NDA #2 at coordinates 41°16.162' N, 72°04.468' W (Figure 1-3; Appendix A, Table 1).
From 28 November to 12 December 1991, 3,100 m? of additional material from Gwen
Mor Marina and Port Niantic, Inc. were deposited at the second NDA buoy location
(Appendix A1).
The D/S buoy was deployed in support of a sediment capping project, marking the
deposition point for material generated from dredging operations at Stonington Harbor,
CT, and the Dow Chemical Company's Allyns Point Plant in Gale's Ferry, CT. During
the Dow/Stonington capping project, disposal of UDM commenced on 2 December 1991
and continued through 12 December 1991. Within those 10 days, an estimated barge
volume of 12,000 m3 of material from Stonington Harbor, as well as 24,000 m3 of dredged
material from Dow Chemical Company's Allyns Point facility, was deposited in close
proximity to the D/S buoy (Appendix A2). Upon conclusion of UDM deposition, a precap
bathymetric survey was performed for the Dow Chemical Company by Ocean Surveys
Incorporated (OSI) of Old Saybrook, Connecticut.
The detected UDM deposit was then targeted for capping with an estimated barge
volume of 59,300 m3 of CDM from the Dow Chemical project. A series of seven capping
points (A-G) were developed to control the CDM dispersal pattern in order to efficiently
cover the 36,100 m3 of UDM to a desired sediment cap thickness of 50-100 cm.
However, due to an apparent error, the positions of the seven capping points were
misinterpreted. As a result, cap material was released both over the mound and east of the
initial D/S sediment deposit. On 15 January 1992, capping operations were concluded,
and a postcap bathymetric survey was conducted in August 1992.
At the conclusion of the capping project, the disposal buoys were scheduled to be
repositioned at the request of the U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Navy. The U.S. Coast
Guard stated that U.S. Navy vessels frequently transit through the area and the disposal
buoys posed a hazard to navigation. The NDA buoy was repositioned on 22 January 1992
at 41°16.252' N, 72°04.756' W, a position outside a newly designated U.S. Navy
shipping lane (NDA #3; Figure 1-3). The smaller D/S buoy, which was scheduled for
removal from NLDS, was not found in the area. It is believed that the D/S buoy was
removed from the site by a U.S. Navy submarine passing through NLDS on approximately
14 January 1992.
The NDA buoy was repositioned, again at the U.S. Navy's request, on 10 April
1992, to its final location of 41°16.163' N, 72°04.996' W, 475 m west of the U.S. Navy
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
9
corridor that transects NLDS (NDA #4; Figure 1-3). No disposal was reported at the third
or fourth NDA buoy locations.
In summary, during the 1991-1992 disposal season, a total of 8,800 m? of dredged
material was disposed at NDA buoy locations #1 and #2 (Appendix Al). A total barge
volume of 95,400 m3 of sediment associated with the Dow/Stonington capping project was
deposited near the center of NLDS (Appendix A2).
A small dredged material disposal mound, which did not require capping, was
formed at 41°16.577' N, 72°04.862' W. This mound (the NL-91 Mound) was formed
when 16,800 m? of dredged material suitable for unconfined open-water disposal was
released at the NDA 92 buoy between 6 February and 2 April 1993.
Although the NDA-97 buoy was deployed in September 1997 at 41° 16.2337 N,
72° 04.906” W (NAD 83) over the NL-94 mound area, disposal was actually directed to
capping points over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex during the 1997-1998 season in
order to augment the cap. DAMOS surveys conducted in 1992 and 1995 indicated that
although a layer of sand covered much of the original Dow/Stonington material, additional
cap material should be placed on the mound complex to ensure unsuitable material was
isolated from the marine environment. An estimated barge volume of 3,750 m3 of suitable
sediment dredged from Shennecossett Yacht Club was deposited over the mound from 10
September 1997 to 9 April 1998. In addition, approximately 3,100 m? of dredged material
from Gales Ferry Marina was deposited at the capping points from 15 to 18 October 1997.
Buoys are not placed in this region to avoid potential obstruction of the 300-m wide
submarine transit corridor. Therefore, accurate disposal was dependent upon the
navigation to pre-determined points via GPS or LORAN-C. The total barge volume of
6,850 m?® of CDM was placed in the northern region of the NL-91 and D/S mound
complex during the 1997-98 disposal season’.
1.2.2 USCGA and NL-94 Disposal Mounds
In January 1995, 43,500 m’ of UDM was released at a USCG buoy (41°16.490' N,
72°04.290' W). This material was then covered with 80,500 m? of capping dredged
material (CDM). The USCG buoy was located approximately 180 m west of the historic
NL-TR Mound apex. The USCGA Mound incorporated most of the NL-TR Mound's
' During the 1998-2000 disposal seasons, over 20,000 m’ of CDM from a number of projects
was placed at the D/S mound to augment the cap. Monitoring of the D/S mound was
conducted during the summer of 2000, including bathymetric and REMOTS® surveys. The
results of these surveys will be published in a subsequent report.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 — 1998
10
western flank. The USCGA Mound was laterally confined by the NL-RELIC Mound to
the west and the NL-II Mound to the east (Figure 1-3). The NL-94 Mound was formed
when 8,700 m? of UDM from Pier 15 at the U.S. Navy Submarine Base was released at
the NDA-94 buoy (41°16.270' N, 72°04.890' W). This UDM, which was released
between 26 December 1994 and 5 January 1995, was covered by 28,200 m°’ of CDM
between 17 January and 14 February 1995. The southern flank of the NL-94 Mound abuts
the historic NL-I Mound.
In addition to the material disposed at the NL-94 Mound during the 1994-95
disposal season, additional material was placed in this location during the 1996-97 disposal
season. In September 1996, a disposal buoy (NDA-96) was deployed at 41° 16.234” N,
72° 05.912° W (41° 16.228° N, 72° 04.941° W; NAD 27), approximately 80 m west-
southwest of the NDA-94 buoy location (Figure 1-2). An estimated barge volume of 3,400
m3 of material dredged from the Niantic River as well as Gales Ferry Marina in the
Thames River was deposited at the NDA 96 buoy, to add to the existing NL-94 Mound.
1.3 Monitoring Activity
1.3.1 August 1992 Monitoring Survey
SAIC conducted a monitoring survey at NLDS from 7 to 9 August 1992 as part of
the DAMOS Program. The field efforts were concentrated over the central region of the
disposal site and consisted of precision bathymetry, Remote Ecological Monitoring of the
Seafloor (REMOTS®) sediment-profile photography, and dissolved oxygen (DO)
measurements to provide information on the effects of the sediment deposition that
occurred in 1991-1992.
The objectives of the August 1992 New London Disposal Site survey were to
e delineate the extent and characterize the topography of recently deposited
dredged material around the Dow/Stonington and NDA disposal points since the
June 1991 survey;
e assess the recolonization status of benthic biota and determine the spatial limits
of the recently deposited sediment;
e determine near-bottom and surface dissolved oxygen concentrations at the active
disposal mound and reference areas.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
The 1992 monitoring scheme at NLDS was designed to verify the following
predictions based in part on the tiered DAMOS monitoring protocol:
e Based on a disposal simulation model, sediment deposited in proximity to the
D/S buoy during the 1991-1992 season should result in the formation of a
capped mound having a radius of approximately 250 m;
e A sediment cap of suitable material, 50-100 cm thick, should exist over the
material dredged from Dow Chemical Company and Stonington Harbor, CT;
e Benthic recolonization over the active disposal area should consist primarily of
Stage I organisms (small pioneering polychaetes). Recolonization on the flanks
of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex and NDA disposal mounds and the
reference sites should be primarily Stage II and Stage III (tubicolous amphipods
and larger burrowing deposit feeders);
e Near-bottom dissolved oxygen concentrations at stations within the disposal site
should be comparable to dissolved oxygen concentrations at reference area
stations.
1.3.2 August 1995 Monitoring Survey
A survey was conducted by SAIC at NLDS from 23 to 26 August 1995 aboard the ~
M/V UCONN. The survey investigated three capped mounds: the U.S. Coast Guard
Academy (USCGA) mound, the New London 1994 (NL-94) mound, and the NL-91 and
D/S mound complex. One mound that did not require capping was also surveyed, the New
London 1992 (NL-92) mound. The survey was designed to measure the areal extent of the
dredged material at the USCGA, NL-94 and NL-92 mounds, assess the recolonization
status of the benthic community at the capped mounds, and determine the effectiveness of
capping operations.
Prior to the survey, predictions were made regarding the health of the benthic
community and the geometry of the disposal mounds (Germano et al. 1994). It was
expected that the benthic community at the most recent disposal mounds would be in the
early stages of recolonization. Benthic infauna at the NL-91 and D/S mound complex
were predicted to be similar to infauna at the reference areas. The data from this survey
showed that the benthic community at the most recent mounds and at the relic NL-91 and
D/S mound complex reflected ambient benthic conditions. Based on the amount of
material slated to be released at the buoys, mounds NL-94 and USCGA were predicted to
be 1.6 m high and 100 m wide (NL-94) and 4.5 m high and 300 m wide (USCGA) if
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
12
disposed on a level seafloor. Bathymetric measurements of the actual seafloor showed the
mounds to be shorter with a more complex shape than predicted by computer models.
1.3.3 September 1997 Monitoring Survey
The specific objectives of the September 1997 New London Disposal Site
monitoring survey were to:
e Assess the benthic recolonization status of the NL-94 mound, as well as the NL-
91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the three reference areas surrounding
NLDS;
e Perform a detailed master bathymetric survey of the region surrounding NLDS
as defined by the 1982 FPEIS;
e Document and delineate the changes in bottom topography (accumulation and
consolidation) in the areas of concentrated disposal since August 1995.
Analyses of data collected during the September 1997 field effort at NLDS were
used to test two hypotheses consistent with the DAMOS Tiered Monitoring Protocols
(Germano et al. 1994). First, it was hypothesized that the past two years of disposal
activity at NLDS had resulted in the formation of a wide sediment mound encompassing
material deposited at the NDA-95 buoy, while the limited volume of material deposited at
the NDA-96 buoy had broadened the southwest apron of the NL-94 Mound. Second, a
healthy benthic assemblage with Stage III individuals was expected at the older disposal
mounds, including the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, as well as the NL-94 Mound.
1.3.4 July 1998 Monitoring Survey
Field operations at the NLDS in July 1998 consisted of a 1000 <x 1000 m
bathymetric survey and REMOTS® sediment-profile photography. These surveys repeated
those conducted in 1997.
The objectives of the 1998 monitoring surveys were to:
e Assess the benthic recolonization status of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex
relative to the three reference areas surrounding the NLDS and to the 1997
survey;
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
13
e Map the extent of fresh capping dredged material over the NL-91 and D/S
_ Mound complex.
Analyses of data collected during the July 1998 field effort at the NLDS were used
to test hypotheses consistent with the DAMOS Tiered Monitoring Protocols (Germano et
al. 1994). First, a healthy benthic assemblage with Stage III individuals were expected
over the older areas of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. Where new capping material
had been placed over the mound complex, Stage I and II organisms were predicted to be
common, representing the early phase of recolonization. Finally, a new layer of capping
dredged material was expected to be detected in REMOTS® stations over the northern and
possibly western region of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex.
1.3.5 NLDS Northern Region
In 1996, DAMOS adopted the NLDS programmatic EIS boundaries which resulted
in a northerly shift of the NLDS boundaries. A baseline characterization of the seafloor
between latitudes 41° 16.606° N and 41° 16.806’ N and longitudes 72° 03.907” W and
72° 05.234° W was required to ensure adequate comparisons with future datasets (Figure
1-2). The 1997 survey over this 0.685 km? area was conducted to provide detailed
information pertaining to bathymetric features and sedimentary characteristics within the
Northern Region. In addition, REMOTS® data were collected over the Northern Region of
NLDS to provide baseline characterization of the sediments prior to dredged material
disposal.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
14
2.0 METHODS
Over the period 1992 to 1998, four environmental monitoring surveys occurred at
the NLDS. In general, field surveys under the DAMOS program are conducted in the
summer, following the dredged material disposal season (1 October to 31 May), to verify
placement of materials and evaluate environmental effects associated with the disposal
activities. Typical survey objectives include determining the distribution of dredged
material on the seafloor and progress in recolonization by benthic organisms.
Precision bathymetry and REMOTS® sediment-profile photography have been
employed as the standard tools for tracking the placement of dredged material, examining
long term fate of individual sediment deposits, and assessing biological conditions at the
disposal sites relative to nearby reference areas. These methods were developed in the
context of a rigorous tiered monitoring approach (Germano et al. 1994). Utilizing these
monitoring techniques, comprehensive monitoring surveys were conducted at NLDS in
August 1992, August 1995, September 1997, and July 1998 (Table 2-1). The bathymetric
and REMOTS® sediment-profile photography survey grids at NLDS varied from year to
year based on changes in the active areas within the disposal site and the overall
management strategy.
2.1 Bathymetry and Navigation
This report chronicles six years (1992-1998) of disposal and survey activity at
NLDS. Within this time period, the instrumentation and analysis procedures employed by
SAIC evolved in a manner that best utilized advances in technology and presentation of
data. This evolution was tightly controlled in order to increase the efficiency of survey
operations while continuing to provide accurate and comparable data relative to previous
monitoring surveys.
Since the inception of the DAMOS Program, all survey results and reported station
locations have been referenced to the North American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27). As the
use of high precision Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) data has become
more widespread, an effort to utilize the most recent datum (the North American Datum of
1983 [NAD 83]) has been instituted. Consequently, this document transitions between the
use of NAD 27 and NAD 83 at NLDS. All survey results, reported station locations, and
disposal site boundaries pre-dating the 1997 Master Bathymetric survey, are referenced to
NAD 27 unless otherwise noted.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
15
Table 2-1
Summary of Bathymetry and REMOTS® Surveys conducted at NLDS 1992-1998
NUMBER OF
YEAR AREA SAMPLES PATTERN
1992
Bathymetry 1600 m X 1600 m
Bathymetry (NAD 27)
REMOTS® NL-91 & D/S 41 Radial around NDA-91-2
Sediment Profile W-REF 13 Cross-Shaped
Photography NE-REF 13 Cross-Shaped
NLON-REF 13 Cross-Shaped
1995
Bathymetry 1600 m X 1600 m
Bathymetry (NAD 27)
REMOTS® NL-91 and D/S mound complex 13 Cross-Shaped
Sediment Profile USCGA Mound 13 Cross-Shaped
Photography NL-94 Mound 15 Radial
W-REF 6 Random
NE-REF 5 Random
NLON-REF 4 Random
1997
Bathymetry 2100 m X 2100 m
Master Bathymetry (NAD 83)
REMOTS® NL-91 and D/S mound complex 13 Cross-Shaped
Sediment Profile NL-94 Mound iS) Radial
Photography W-REF 4 Random
NE-REF 5 Random
NLON-REF 4 Random
1998
REMOTS® NL-91 and D/S mound complex 13 Cross-Shaped
Sediment Profile W-REF 4 Random
Photography NE-REF 5 Random
NLON-REF 4 Random
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
16
2.1.1 1992 and 1995 Survey Activity
During the 1992 and 1995 survey efforts, SAIC’s Integrated Navigation and Data
Acquisition System (INDAS) was used for precision navigation and data collection
(Table 2-2). This system utilized a Hewlett Packard 9920 series computer to provide real-
time navigation, as well as collect position, depth, and time data for later analysis. INDAS
was interfaced with a Del Norte Model 542 Trisponder® System that provided real-time
positioning to an accuracy of +3.0 m. The Del Norte Trisponder System is based on
multiple range (range-range) measurements from shore-based remote stations in order to
triangulate vessel position at a frequency of 1 Hz. SAIC established two shore stations
along the Connecticut coast at the known benchmarks of Millstone Nuclear Power Station
(41°18.312' N, 72°09.873' W) and New London Lighthouse (41°18.991' N,
72°05.414' W) for the survey operations performed at NLDS (Figure 1-1). In order to
facilitate comparisons with previous data sets, all positioning information was referenced to
the horizontal control of North American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27). A detailed
description of the navigation system and its operation can be found in the DAMOS
navigation and bathymetry reference report (Murray and Selvitelli 1996).
In August 1992, SAIC completed a bathymetric survey over a 1600 m X 1600 m
survey area centered at 41°16.235' N, 72°04.492' W. This survey required 65 lanes at
25 m lane spacing to cover the 2.56 km? area (Figure 2-1). This was an identical grid used
for bathymetric surveys in June-July 1990 and June 1991, permitting depth differences to
be calculated relative to previous surveys. In-depth analysis of the D/S mound was
accomplished by re-gridding the bathymetric data to a 500 m X 670 m area surrounding
the disposal buoy positions (Figure 2-1).
The 1600 m X 1600 m survey area was reoccupied in August 1995 to determine the
changes in seafloor topography resulting from the deposition of sediments from October
1992 through June 1995. This survey area was later divided into smaller analysis areas
(NL-92 mound, NL-94 mound, USCGA mound) to yield better-defined depth difference
comparisons with the August 1992 survey (Figure 2-1).
2.1.2 1997 and 1998 Survey Activity
In 1997, a new master bathymetric survey of the disposal site utilized a different
positioning and survey system. Bathymetric data were collected with the use of SAIC's
Portable Integrated Navigation and Survey System (PINSS) during the September 1997
survey, as well as the effort in July 1998 (Table 2-2). This system utilizes a Toshiba®
3200DX series computer to provide real-time navigation, as well as collect position, depth,
and time data for later analysis. A Magnavox MX4200D GPS receiver was interfaced to a
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
SVCH DIVS
SVCH OIVS
SVCH OIVS
SVCH OIVS
WI93SAS
SUISSIIOIg UIQ
2q01d GLO
10-61 AAS wsevag
2q01d GLO
10-61 AAS weovag
2q0ld GLO
10-61 AdS yeoeaG
2q0ld GLO
10-61 HAS weovag
Ido1g
punos jo pssds
XCO0CE Bqrysoy,
SSNId OIVS
XCO0CE BqTYsoy,
SSNId OIVS
Jd 0766 dH
SVCNI OIVS
Od 07066 dH
SVCNI OIVS
wWayskS
uontsinboy veg
(ZHA80Z) IeOYOA
00TEAG WOpO
(ZHA80Z) seNOYI
00TEAC WOPO
(ZHA80Z) oeNOYyoY
00TEAC WopO
(ZH80Z) eNOYo
00ceEAC WOpO
Japunosoyqoy
uoovag YLPXIN P919T
/ SdD 0007
s(quLy -SdOG
uoovag UIPXIN B107T
/ S$dD GO0CVXW
xoAeUusey] ‘SGD
Jopuodsuely, ZpS SON
[oq :osueysosuey
Jopuodsue1y, ZS SUON
[oq :osueysosuey
8661
L661
S661
C661
W19}SAG SUIMONISOg
SC'IN 38 SAaAing syouIAqeg 10} DOTVS Aq posojdurg yuaudmby Avaing jo Areumumneg
CC ATE L
Iva
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
18
1992 and 1995 Bathymetric Survey Area
D/S, USCGA, NL-92, and NL-94
Analysis Areas
41° 16.500°N alysis Areal USCGA Mound
y Analysis Area
D/S Mound
41° 16.000°N
AE
I
peice DAMOS Disposal Site Boundary
te ch ie abide a an i Aa as ac a
41° 15.500°N
72° 05.500° W 72°05.000°W 72°04.500 W 72°04.000°W 72° 03.500° W
NLDS
NAD 27
i OUT
Om 400m 800m
Figure 2-1. Location of the 1992 and 1995 bathymetric survey area over NLDS, relative
to the disposal site boundaries, analysis areas for individual mounds, and the
New York and Connecticut State Line (NAD 27)
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
19
Leica MX41R differential beacon receiver to obtain positioning data at an accuracy of
+3 m in the horizontal control of NAD 83.
The GPS receiver utilized signals emitted from a constellation of satellites that
provides positioning data to an accuracy of +100 m. In order to increase the accuracy of the
raw GPS data, a differential beacon receiver was used to collect and decode corrections from
a Shore-based station. Signals broadcast from the U.S. Coast Guard differential beacon at
Montauk Point, New York (293 kHz) were utilized for satellite corrections due to its
geographic position relative to NLDS. When merged with the satellite data, the correctors
provide differential GPS positions to an accuracy of +3 m with an update rate of 1 Hz.
The bathymetric survey area occupied in September 1997 was centered at
41° 16.274° N 72° 04.580° W (NAD 83). This survey was performed to characterize all
the bathymetric features within the confines of the disposal site. A total of 85 lanes,
oriented east-west with a 25 m lane spacing, were occupied during the September 1997
field operations to provide a detailed bathymetric chart of the 4.41 km? area (2100 x
2100 m; Figure 2-2). No bathymetric data were collected over the project mounds during
the 1998 survey effort.
2.1.3 Bathymetric Data Collection
An ODOM DF3200 Echotrac® Survey Fathometer with a narrow beam, 208 kHz
transducer measured individual depths to a resolution of 3.0 cm (0.1 ft) as described in
DAMOS Contribution No. 48 (SAIC 1985). The fathometer is interfaced directly with the
navigation system. Depth soundings were collected along the individual survey lanes,
adjusted for transducer depth, and transmitted to INDAS/PINSS at a frequency of 10 Hz.
The soundings were averaged by the navigation system, merged with positional and time
information, and recorded at a frequency of 1 Hz. Survey vessel speed and course were
tightly controlled (2 to 3 meters per second) to ensure adequate numbers of depth values
collected along the survey lane.
A Seabird Instruments, Inc. SEACAT SBE 19-01 Conductivity, Temperature, and
Depth (CTD) Probe was used to obtain sound velocity measurements at the start, midpoint,
and end of each survey day. The data collected by the CTD were bin-averaged to 1 meter
depth bins to account for any pycnoclines (rapid changes in density creating distinct layers
within the water column). A mean sound velocity was then calculated using the bin-
averaged values. The mean sound velocity was recorded and later used in the post-
processing of the bathymetric data.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
20
1997 Bathymetric Survey Area
41° 16.500° N
41° 16.000° N
41° 15.500° N-E—
72° 05.500° W 72° 05.000°W 72°04.500°W 72° 04.000 W 72° 03.500° W
NLDS
NAD 83
a
Om 400m 800m
Figure 2-2. Location of the 1997 master bathymetric survey area over NLDS, relative to
the disposal site boundaries and the New York and Connecticut State Line
(NAD 83)
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
21
2.1.4 Bathymetric Data Processing
During data analysis, the raw bathymetric data from INDAS/PINSS were corrected
for changes in tidal height and sound velocity. In 1992, these data were standardized to
Mean Low Water. Tidal height corrections were based on the observed National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) data for the New London, Connecticut, tidal
station. The 1995 and subsequent surveys utilized six-minute observed tidal data obtained
via the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Ocean and
Lake Levels Division's National Water Level Observation Network.
Observed tide data are downloaded through the Internet in a station datum or
referenced to Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) and based on Coordinated Universal
Time. For the 1995 and 1997 NLDS surveys, data from the NOAA tide station 8461490
in New London Harbor, New London, Connecticut were downloaded in the MLLW datum
and corrected to local time. Tide differences based on the entrance to West Harbor,
Fishers Island, New York, were applied to the observed data.
In August 1995, tidal data were also collected on-site with a Seabird Instruments,
Inc. SBE 26-03 Sea Gauge wave and tide recorder. The tide gauge recorded pressure
values every six minutes and provided, after conversion, a constant record of tidal
variations in the survey area. These observed tidal data were later used to compare and
verify the corrected NOAA data.
The bathymetric data were analyzed using SAIC's Hydrographic Data Analysis
System (HDAS), Version 1.03. Raw bathymetric data were imported into HDAS,
corrected for sound velocity, and standardized to MLLW using the NOAA observed tides.
The bathymetric data were then processed to produce depth models of the survey area. A
model is a depth matrix used to generate graphical representations of the survey area (i.e.,
three-dimensional plots and depth contours). A detailed discussion of the bathymetric data
acquisition and analysis is given in the DAMOS navigation and bathymetry reference
report (Murray and Selvitelli 1996).
The depth model for each bathymetric survey performed over NLDS was then
subjected to depth difference routines in HDAS to detect and quantify changes in seafloor
topography over time. The end result of the depth difference comparison is a graphical
representation of a disposal mound or mounds. However, due to a variety of factors (tidal
corrections, changes in sound velocity through the water column, the slope of the bottom,
and vertical motion of the survey vessel) comparisons of sequential bathymetric surveys
can only reliably detect changes in depth of 20 cm or greater. These factors often
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
22
introduce artifacts that may appear to be small areas of depth increase or decrease. As a
result, the lateral extent of a disposal mound or apron is often below the threshold of the
bathymetric data products. Other monitoring techniques are often employed to define the
thinner margins of the disposal mound (i.e., sediment-profile photography).
2.2 REMOTS® Sediment Profile Photography
REMOTS® sediment-profile photography is a benthic sampling technique used to
detect and map the distribution of thin (<20 cm) dredged material layers, map benthic
disturbance gradients, and monitor the process of benthic recolonization over the disposal
mound. This is a reconnaissance survey technique used for rapid collection, interpretation
and mapping of data on physical and biological seafloor characteristics. REMOTS®
utilizes a Benthos Model 3731 Sediment-Profile Camera, designed to obtain undisturbed,
vertical cross-section photographs (in situ profiles) of the upper 15 to 20 cm of the
seafloor, for analysis and interpretation.
The REMOTS® hardware consists of a wedge-shaped optical prism having a
standard 35mm-camera mounted horizontally above in a watertight housing (Figure 2-3).
The prism resembles an inverted periscope, with a clear Plexiglas window measuring
15 cm wide and 20 cm high and an internal mirror mounted at a 45° angle to reflect the
image in the window up to the camera. Light is provided by an internal strobe that resides
within the optical prism. In order to equalize pressure and reduce refraction, the prism is
filled with distilled water. The prism sits inside a stainless steel external frame, and the
entire assembly is lowered to the seafloor using a standard winch mounted aboard the
survey vessel. Upon contact with the bottom, the prism descends slowly into the seafloor,
cutting a vertical cross-section profile of the upper 15 to 20 cm of sediment, and a
photograph is taken of the sediment in contact with the window. The resulting 35-mm
slides (images) showing relatively undisturbed sediment profiles are then analyzed for a
standard suite of measured parameters (Rhoads and Germano 1982; 1986).
Computer-aided analysis of each REMOTS® sediment profile image yielded a series
of measurements. The standard measured parameters include sediment grain size major
mode, camera prism penetration depth (an indirect measure of sediment bearing
capacity/density), small-scale surface boundary roughness, depth of the apparent redox
potential discontinuity (RPD), infaunal successional stage, and Organism-Sediment Index
(a summary parameter reflecting the overall benthic habitat quality). A detailed
description of REMOTS® photograph acquisition and interpretive rationale is given in
DAMOS Contribution No. 60 (Parker and Revelas 1989), as well as in Rhoads and
Germano (1982; 1986). The following paragraphs provide brief descriptions of the
interpretive framework and methods used for the various measurement parameters.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
23
LIFTING BAR
END CAP
(HOUSING FOR
ELECTRONICS)
INNER FRAME
OUTER FRAME
WEIGHT |
: WEIGHT PACK
A) |RSS |
is MUD DOOR
MUD DOOR ) a_ Ik Koa -_ ELASTIC STRAP
mes eel
SAK BN X ONG MUD DOOR
Vale
\ race pLaTE SS,
\ =
s BASE (SLED)
DEPLOYED ON THE "DOWN" POSITION
SEAFLOOR Transecting the
Sediment-Water Interface |
™ =
ACOUSTIC im,
SIGNAL my,
TO THE
3 SURFACE a” ~
™™\ SIGNAL
RATE
BCER | DOUBLES
WINDOW
MIRROR
3. CAMERA PHOTOGRAPHS
MAGEDIMENT PROFILE
SEAFLOOR
1. FACEPLATE ——————">
or "WINDOW"
OF PRISM AGAINST
SURFACE TO BE
PHOTOGRAPHED DISTILLED WATER INSIDE PRISM
2.IMAGE REFLECTS OFF 45°
<— MIRROR
Figure 2-3. Schematic diagram of Benthos, Inc. Model 3731 REMOTS® sediment-profile
camera and sequence of operation on deployment.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
24
The sediment grain size major mode values are visually estimated from the
REMOTS® photographs by overlaying a grain size comparator that is at the same scale.
For REMOTS® analysis, sediment grain size major mode is expressed in phi units. This
measurement represents the dominant grain size in the entire frame (field of view) and may
not distinguish layers of coarser or finer material. However, the results presented in this
report for 1992 and 1997 explicitly record distinct layers separately from major mode. A
grain size scale for sediments has been provided in Table 2-3, to allow easy conversion
between phi units, millimeters, and standard sieve sizes.
The REMOTS sediment profile camera consists of an optical prism, which
penetrates the bottom under a static driving force imparted by its own weight. The
penetration depth into the bottom depends on the force exerted by the optical prism and the
bearing strength of the sediment. If the weight of the camera prism is held constant, the
change in penetration depth over a surveyed site will reflect changes in geotechnical
properties of the bottom. In this sense, the camera prism acts as a static-load
penetrometer. The depth of penetration of the optical prism into the bottom can be a
useful parameter, because dredged and capped materials often will have different shear
strengths and bearing capacities.
Small-scale surface boundary roughness is the amount of surface relief at the
sediment-water interface, and is calculated by measuring the vertical distance between the
high and low points of the interface in each sediment-profile photograph. Boundary
roughness can be categorized as biological, physical, or indeterminate. Biological
disturbances, typically the result of macrofaunal activity, usually result in only a small
increase is boundary roughness (<1 cm). A mature and undisturbed benthic environment
tends to have biological boundary roughness. Physical disturbances can be anthropogenic
in origin (for example, by bottom trawling or dredged material disposal) or attributed to
natural processes such as wave and current motion.
The Apparent Redox Potential Discontinuity (RPD) depth is the boundary between
oxygenated sediment and the underlying hypoxic or anoxic sediment. The RPD depth is a
sensitive indicator of the biological mixing depth, infaunal successional status, and within-
station patchiness (Revelas et al. 1987). The RPD is determined by measuring the
thickness of the high reflectance sediment layer at the sediment-water interface formed by
light-colored oxygenated or oxidized sediment. :
Successional stage mapping is based upon the hypothesis that organism-sediment
interactions follow a predictable successional sequence after a major seafloor disturbance
(Rhoads and Germano 1986). A disturbance can be any type of event that induces seafloor
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
25
Table 2-3
Grain Size Scales for Sediments
ASTM (Unified) Classification’ | __U.S.Std. Sieve’ [| _‘Sizeinmm __—'|_—S~Phi@) Size__| Wentworth Classification’
Boulder
Boulder
12 in 300 mm)
Large Cobble
Cobble
Small Cobble
3 in (75mm)
Very Large Pebble
Coarse Gravel
3/4 in (19 mm) : Hi Large Pebble
Medium Pebble
Fine Gravel 2.5
3
3.5
4 (4.75 mm) % 5 Small Pebble
5 x f
6 5 : e
Coarse Sand 7
8
10 (2.0 mm) Granule
Very Coarse Sand
Medium Sand
Coarse Sand
Medium Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Very Fine Sand
Fine-grained Soil:
Clay if PI > 4 and plot of PI vs.
LL is on or above "A" line”
Silt if PI < 4 and plot of PI vs.
LL is below "A" line’
Coarse Silt
Medium Silt
Fine Silt
Very Fine Silt
Coarse Cla
Medium Cla:
Fine Clay
x
and the presence of organic matter
does not influence LL.
1. ASTM Standard D 2487-92. This is the ASTM version of the Unified Soil Classification System. Both systems are similar (from ASTM (1993)).
2. Note that British Standard, French, and German DIN mesh sizes and classifications are different.
3. Wentworth sizes (in inches) cited in Krumbein and Sloss (1963).
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
26
erosion, changes seafloor chemistry, or causes major reorganization of the resident
benthos. These perturbations can be natural events (i.e., strong currents or a passing
storm) or anthropogenic events (i.e., dredged material disposal or power plant effluent).
Pioneering assemblages (Stage I) usually consist of dense aggregations of near-
surface living, tube-dwelling polychaetes. These organisms begin to populate a sediment
deposit within days of a benthic disturbance, as they readily exploit the competition free
space. Due to their limited interaction with the sediment, these organisms are usually
associated with a shallow RPD.
In more stable environments Stage I assemblages are replaced by infaunal deposit
feeders or larger tube dwellers (Stage II). Typical Stage II organisms in Long Island
Sound include shallow-dwelling bivalves and tubicolous amphipods. In general, tubicolous
amphipods are common in eastern Long Island Sound. The presence of dense aggregations
of these amphipods (Ampelisca sp.) in the area surrounding NLDS has been identified as a
cyclical phenomenon as the spring-summer and over-winter populations mature, reproduce,
and decline. As a result, the timing of the individual REMOTS® surveys over the years
have documented the amphipod populations in eastern Long Island Sound during different
stages of the life cycle.
Stage III biota represent a high-order successional stage and are usually associated
with areas of seafloor that is not usually subject to surface disturbances. Stage III
assemblages (infaunal invertebrates) are typically head-down deposit feeders whose feeding
behavior usually results in distinctive subsurface voids. The foraging activities of Stage III
organisms are capable of introducing oxygen-rich bottom water to the sediment at depths
approaching 10-20 cm below the sediment-water interface. As a result, the bioturbational
activity of Stage III organisms tends to cause the deepening of the RPD.
A multi-parameter REMOTS® Organism-Sediment Index (OSI) has been
constructed to characterize habitat quality (Table 2-4). Habitat quality is defined relative
to two end-member standards. The lowest value is given to those sediments which have
low or no dissolved oxygen in the overlying bottom water, very shallow RPD depth, no
apparent macrofaunal life, and methane gas present in the sediment. The REMOTS® OSI
value for such a condition is minus 10 (-10). At the other end of the scale, an aerobic
bottom with a deep RPD, evidence of a mature macrofaunal assemblage, and no apparent
methane gas bubbles at depth will have a OSI value of plus 11 (+11). OSI values of +6 or
less are indicative of chronically stressed benthic habitats and/or those that have
experienced recent disturbance (i.e., erosion, sediment transport, dredged material
disposal, hypoxia, intense demersal predator foraging, etc.; Rhoads and Germano 1982).
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
27
Table 2-4
Calculation of REMOTS® Organism Sediment Index Value
A. CHOOSE ONE VALUE:
Mean RPD Depth Index Value
0.00 cm
> 0-0.75 cm
0.75 - 1.50 cm
1.51 - 2.25 cm
2.26 - 3.00 cm
Sl +375). Gi
> 3.75 cm
B. CHOOSE ONE VALUE:
Successional Stage Index Value
Azoic
Stage I
Stage I ® II
Stage II
Stage II ® I
Stage III
Stage I on III
Stage II on Ill
C. CHOOSE ONE OR BOTH IF APPROPRIATE:
Chemical Parameters Index Value
Methane Present -2
No/Low Dissolved
Oxygen** -4
REMOTS® ORGANISM-SEDIMENT INDEX = Total of above
subset indices
(A+B+C)
RANGE: -10- +11
** Note: This is not based on a Winkler or polarigraphic electrode measurement. It is based on
the imaged evidence of reduced, low reflectance (i.e., high oxygen demand) sediment
at the sediment-water interface.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
2.2.1 NL-91 and the Dow/Stonington (D/S) Mound Complex
The NL-91 and D/S Mound complex was developed as part of a dredged material
capping project during the 1991-92 disposal season. These mounds were first monitored
using REMOTS® sediment-profile photography in August 1992. Three replicate
photographs were collected at each of 41 REMOTS® stations radially distributed around
the NDA-91-2 buoy position (Figure 2-4A; Table 2-4). The name of each station in Figure
2-4 represents its distance (in meters) from the center (CTR) station. Many of these
stations extend out to historic disposal mounds placed during the last three decades.
Follow-on surveys (1995, 1997, and 1998) focused primarily on the D/S sediment
deposit. As a result, the survey grid was modified to evaluate the recovery of the capped
mound. A cross-shaped, 13-station REMOTS® grid was established over the capped
mound and centered at the D/S buoy position (41°16.160' N, 72°04.470' W; NAD 27;
Figure 2-4B). Once again, three replicate photographs were obtained at each REMOTS®
station.
This smaller, 13-station REMOTS® grid was re-occupied in 1997 and 1998,
replicating the August 1995 monitoring activity. The change in positioning systems and
horizontal control (NAD 27 to NAD 83) resulted in a change in the units of the survey
center (41° 16.168’ N 72° 04.439° W; NAD 83; Table 2-4). However, there was no
alteration of the REMOTS® survey grid relative to seafloor features and operations
performed in previous years, only a change in the reported coordinate system
(Figure 2-4B).
2.2.2 USCGA Mound
The USCGA mound was first examined using sediment-profile photography in
August 1995. A 13-station, cross-shaped grid, with a southeast extension, centered at
41°16.480' N, 72°04.290' W (NAD 27) was established over the USCGA mound
(Figure 2-5; Table 2-5). Due to the findings of the August 1995 effort, no follow-on
surveys were conducted in 1997 or 1998.
2.2.3 NL-94 Mound
The NL-94 mound was subjected to detailed investigation using REMOTS®
sediment-profile photography in August 1995 and September 1997. A 15-station, modified
radial grid centered on the NDA-94-1 buoy position (41°16.240' N, 72°04.890' W; NAD
27) was established over the NL-94 mound. The REMOTS® stations extended up to 150 m
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
29
M.289'¥0 22 | N.891'91 ol P M.++9'0 ocZ | N.29b'9b obt
M.+ES'VO 22 | N.8OL'9b ob NM ..0vS'¥0 ocd | N.2OL'OL oP
M.+80'%0 22 | N.891'91 ob P M.Olb PO 2 | N.Z9L'9b ob P
M.€S+'70 o22 | N.891'91 obt M.Z8L'0 eZ | N.Z9b'9b ob t
M ..¥22'00 cL | N.891'91 ol v NM .6€¢'v0 oc M.€SZ'v0 ocZ | N.29L9b ob bv N .89¢'90 oc2
M .962'~0 22 | N.891'91 obP N.891'9) ob? M .SZE'v0 cL | N.Z9} 9b ob b N.Z9L 9b obb
M.L9€'¥0 22 | N.891'91 ol P 2661 M .96€'¥0 ZL | N.Z91L 9b ob v S66L
M.6E¢'¥0 cL | N.090'91 obP punow s/a M.89¢'v0 oc | N.¥S0'9b ob PD punow s/a
M .6Ev'P0 cL | N.PLL OL oP M .89¢'V0 ocZ | N.801'9b obP
M.6E¢'¥0 Ll | N.OEE'9L obP M .89¢'v0 o2Z | N.PZE9Ob bb
M.6€'70 cL | N.OL2 91 ob t M .89¢'P0 022 | N.OLZ'9b obb
M .6€P'v0 cL | N.227'91 obP M.89¥'P0 ocZ | N.OLZ 9b obt
M.68E'v0 ocZ | N.891'91 LY ; M.89¢'70 cL | N.Z9L 9b bv 4
epmrbuoy | epmney cc | [ eemueuor | epnmer cies |e
£80VN
8661-2661
M.?6S'¥0 ocL
M.8S'00 oc
M.v82'00 22
M.2b2 00 o@
M.4b79'P0 022
M.699'0 0&2
M.66S'~0 022
M,8?S'P0 oc
M.26¢'°90 022
M.26t'V0 022
M,26'P0 22
M.26¢°0 022
M.26b°P0 022
M,L6¢'P0 ocL
M.09€'b0 cL
M.88€'P0 cL
M.SLP'P0 ocL
M.€6b'¥0 022
M.¢v2'v0 022
M.S62'V0 o2L
M.SE'V0 oL
M.96€'P0 oc
M.Leb'0 oc
M.00b'P0 eZ
M.991b'¥0 cL
M.£€2'00 of
N.890'V0 ocL
M.6EL'V0 cL
M.bbe'P0 of
M.282'00 o2L
M.SE'V0 o2L
M.92¢'v0 ocL
M.£€Z'P0 oc
M.662'¥0 o2L
M.69€'V0 o2L
M2090 o2L
M.26b'90 022
M.L6P'P0 oL
M.269'V0 cL
M.26¢'v0 022
N.26¢'v0 ocL
N.2Z€'91 ol D MNO02
N.682'91 ob? MNOOL
N. 19291 ob? MO0v
N,}92'9b ob MOO0E
N. 19291 ol? MO00Zz
N,192'9b ol MOOL
N.VLL Ob ob P Mso0z
N.ZbZ'9b ol ¥ MSOOL
N,926'S} ob P $009
N.086'S} ob? soos
N.PEO'9L ob? soor
N.880'91 ob? Sooe
N.ZPL OL ob PB $002
N. 26191 ob PB SOOL
N,L00'9L ob? 3ssoos
N.}S0°91 ob? 3Sso0ov
N. LOLOL ob? BSsooe
N.1ZO'9L ob? 3S009
N,690'91} ob? 3S00s
N.860'91 ob? 3So0r
N.QEL OL ob P BSooe
N.VLE OL ob PD 38002
N.Zb2'9b ob PD 3So0r
N.9Z1 QL ol? 3$3009
N.ZPL OL ob? 3s3009
N.891 91 ob P 3S300¢
N.FSZ'OL ob? 3009
N.}S2°91 ob v 300s
N. b92'9b ob? 300¢
N.}S2'9b ob 300e
N.FS2'Ob ob P 3002
N.LS2'9b ob? 3001
N.ECE'OL ol P AN300¢
N.ELE Ob ob v SN300€
N.2Z€'91 ol? SN00Z
N,682'91 ob B SNOOL
N.29v'91 ob PB Noor
N.ELP'OL ob v NOOe
N.6S€'91 ob v Nooz
N,S0E'9t ob?
N.LSZ'9OL ob D = Phe)
spmmbuoy | epmney | vonas | cay |
LZZQVN ZZQVN
| S66L Z66L
N.L6¥'¥0 02L
N.LSZ'OL oP
2661
xe\duo9
punow S/d +6-1N
-Z661 ported oy} 100 xefduioD punoy] $/q PUe 16-IN 94} 38 SUOTEIG SudUES gS LOWA JO SeyeUIp.100+5
S-¢ 91GB L
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
30
1992 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Sampling Grid
41° 16.750°N
Bathymetric Survey Area
S)
AMOS Disposal Site) Boundary
ty
41° 16.500°N
41° 16.250°N
41° 16.000°
41° 15.750°N
72° 05.250° W 72° 05.000° W 72° 04.750°W 72° 04.500°W 72° 04.250°W 72° 04.000° W
NLDS
NAD 27
a
Om 200m 400m
Figure 2-4A. Distribution of the 1992 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations
(41) over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the DAMOS
disposal site boundary and the US Navy submarine corridor
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
31
1995, 1997, and 1998 REMOTS®
Sediment-Profile Photography
Sampling Grid
41° 16.750°N
GER
-DA
Bathymetric Survey Area
al ‘
MOS Disposal Site Boundary
41° 16.500°N
ubmarine Cor)
Ss
a
(
|
i
41° 16.250°N
NCI
WON CAR, QOE qQ0E age sqne coe
mk N Nr a a
Biss Awe
41° 16.000°N
41° 15.750°N
72° 05.250°W72° 05.000°W72° 04.750°W7/2° 04.500°W72° 04.250°W72° 04.000°W
NLDS
Ey a7
Om 200m 400m
Figure 2-4B. Distribution of 1995, 1997, and 1998 REMOTS® sediment-profile
photography stations (13) over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative
to disposal site boundary and the US Navy submarine corridor
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
32
1995 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Sampling Grid
USCGA Mound
41° 16.500°N
7
41° 16.250°N
Figure 2-5. Distribution of 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations (13)
over the USCGA mound, relative to the detectable margins of the mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
from the center of the capped mound (Figure 2-6; Table 2-6A). The 1997 field effort
reported the survey center as 41° 16.244” N 72° 04.864° W in NAD 83. The 15-station,
radial pattern was re-occupied in September 1997 to allow comparisons between the data
sets (Table 2-6).
2.2.4 Northern Region
Due to the northerly shift in the surveyed NLDS boundaries in 1996, baseline
characterization of the sediments within the region north of the NL-Relic mound was
required. In September 1997, REMOTS® data were collected over the Northern Region to
evaluate the benthic habitat conditions within the sediments before they received any
further direct deposition of dredged material (this region received material prior to
DAMOS monitoring). In order to cover the 0.685 km? area of seafloor efficiently, a total
of 11 stations were occupied along two parallel, east-west trending lines. Five stations,
spaced 410 m apart, were established along the northern line (latitude 41° 16.779° N;
NAD 83) while the southern line (latitude 41° 16.633° N; NAD 83) was composed of six
stations, spaced at 350 m intervals (Figure 2-7; Table 2-7).
2.2.5 NLDS Reference Areas
Data from three reference areas (NLON REF, NE REF, and WEST REF) are used
for comparison of ambient eastern Long Island Sound sediments relative to the material
deposited at NLDS through disposal operations. These three established reference areas
are often sampled as part of sediment chemistry and benthic habitat surveys at NLDS.
From 1992 through 1998, the NLDS reference areas were sampled as part of the sediment-
profile photography surveys of the various project mounds within the disposal site.
In 1992, three 13-station REMOTS® grids were occupied at the NLDS reference
areas: W-REF, NE-REF, and NLON-REF (Figure 2-8; Table 2-8). The REMOTS®
sampling grids over the NLDS reference areas formed a cross-shaped pattern with a center
station and three additional stations along each of four arms spaced at 100 m intervals.
The surveys over NLON REF, NE REF, and WEST REF were centered at 41°16.660' N,
72°02.000' W, 41°16.680' N, 72°03.400' W, and 41°16.200' N, 72°06.000' W (NAD
27) respectively.
In 1995 and subsequent surveys, the sampling rationale at the NLDS reference areas
changed somewhat, as a random sampling pattern was introduced (Figure 2-8). Four to six
stations were randomly selected within a 300 meter radius of the center of each reference
area. A total of fifteen REMOTS® stations (STA) were sampled at NLON REF, NE REF,
and WEST REF in 1995. NLON REF was sampled at four randomly selected stations.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
34
Table 2-6
USCGA Mound
REMOTS® Stations Coordinates
1995
| NAD27
[Area | Station | Latitude | Longitude
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
41° 16.468"
41° 16.495"
41° 16.522°
41° 16.441"
41° 16.414°
USCGA 41° 16.387"
1995 41° 16.468"
41° 16.468° N 41° 16.468"
72° 04.297° W 41° 16.468"
41° 16.449°
41° 16.430°
41° 16.468"
41° 16.468"
C55 C5 CS C4 CS TS CBS ECS, SS
72° 04.297"
72° 04.297"
72° 04.297"
72° 04.297"
72° 04.297"
72° 04.297"
12° 04.261°
72° 04.225°
72° 04.190"
12° 04.272°
72° 04.246"
72° 04.333"
72° 04.369"
SStStzzzezz22228&=
M .696°70 .cZ
M.¥v6'V0 cL
M.816°V0 2
M .S96°00 .c2
M.vv6'v0 cl
M.816°90 cL
M_.€68°V0 .cZ
M.LZb8°V0 cL
M.év8'v0 cL
M .898°00 .c2
M.1Lé8°V0 oc
M..¢v8'00 oc
M .898°70 oc
M.£68'00 oc
M_.€68°70 oc
[apne | aprane| | wonens [sag]
e80VN
N .G62'91 oP
N 92291 bY
N.2S¢°91 bY
N .8€2 91 LY
N 00291 Lv
N 61291 bY
N .vpe9Ol ov
N 2819) obv
N 90291 bv
N.S¢2?9l oY
N.vve Ol bv
N .c82°9L obY
N.€92°91 bv
N.b20°91 ob
N.vve9l bt
M _.V98'70 cL
N.vp2 Ob bv
Z661
v6-1N
M .696°70 .c2
M.vbv6'00 2
M.816'0 2
M .S96'V0 .c2
M.vb6'v0 C2
M.816°V0 cL
M .€68°v0 ocL
M.21L8°0 2
M.cv8'v0 cL
M .898'~0 oc
M.+28°v0 2
M .cv8'p0 cL
M .898°70 oc
NM .€68'90 cL
M .€68°70 cL
N .S6¢'91 bY
N 92291 obv
N .2S¢°9L obV
N .8€¢'9L bP
N.00¢°91 oP
N 61291 bv
N.bLC OL obP
N.-LSL OL OY
N .002'91 oP
N.6L¢91 bP
N .8€¢°91 LY
N 92291 bP
N.2S2°91 obv
N.G92'9L OLY
N .8€2'91 oP
SdJBUIP1OOZ SUOTIEIS gS LOWAY
punoy -6IN
L-C AGL
M .€68'00 ocL
N .8€2 9b bv
S661
v6-IN
spmiBuet | _apminey | Wore | wang
ZcQVN
S661
Vv
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
36
North Region
Table 2-8
New London Disposal Site
Northern Region
REMOTS® Stations Coordinates
1997
[Area | Station | Latitude | Longitude
41° 16.633”
41° 16.779"
41° 16.633"
41° 16.779"
41° 16.633"
41° 16.779"
41° 16.633
41° 16.779"
41° 16.633"
41° 16.779"
41° 16.6337
NLDS
1997
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
72° 03.945"
72° 03.988"
72° 04.196"
72° 04.282°
72° 04.446"
72° 04.576"
72° 04.697°
72° 04.869"
72° 04.948"
72° 05.162”
72° 05.198"
Fh ea 202 ed, 2d FB e2 FD FA Fe
SfStetete2e222228&=
41° 16.400° N->
41° 16.300° N-+
ST,
NL-94 Mound
1995 & 1997 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Station Locations
Wie / BACs SA
KOON Acoustically Detectable __
400NW) 400NE “NL-94 Mound /
Ty Rey Ze v= QO \
41° 16.200° NI /
41° 16.100° N4\ \
¢
Figure 2-6.
72° 05.000° W 72° 04.900°W 72° 04.800 W 72° 04.700 W 72° 04.600° W
NLDS
NAD 27
a
Om 100 m 200 m
Distribution of 1995 and 1997 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography
stations (13) over the NL-94 mound, relative to the detectable margins of the
mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
38
1997 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Station Locations over September 1997 Bathymetery
41° 16.800° Nj
_Northern Region
41° 16.600° N |
_/museeuic *
41° 16.400° N
USCGAINL ‘TR
72° 05.300° W 72° 04.900° W 72° 04.500° W 72° 041 00° W
Figure 2-7. Distribution of 1997 REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations (11)
over the Northern Region, relative to the FPEIS disposal site boundary and
historic disposal mounds
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
39
1992, 1995, 1997, and 1998 Reference Area
REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
Sampling Grids
41° 17.000’ N Ver
NLON REF
NE REF 300 m radius
41° 16.500° N o<
1992 Survey Grid
41° 16.000° N
PEIS Boundary
\Boundary. See
41° 15.500" N4 connecticut
Figure 2-8. Location of the NLDS reference areas and distribution 1992 reference area
REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations (39), relative to the NLDS
site boundaries and New York-Connecticut State Line
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
40
WEST REF was sampled at six randomly selected stations (STAS falling outside the 300 m
sampling radius). NE REF was sampled at five randomly selected stations (STA1 falling
outside the 300 m sampling radius; Table 2-8).
The random sampling protocol continued for the 1997 and 1998 field efforts with
NLON REF (41°16.666° N, 72° 01.971° W) and WEST REF (41° 16.206” N, 72°
05.971” W) each being sampled at four randomly selected stations. NE REF (41° 16.6867
N, 72° 03.371°W) was sampled at five randomly selected stations. However, the center
coordinates and target station locations were reported in the horizontal control of NAD 83
(Figure 2-8; Table 2-8).
2.3. Dissolved Oxygen Sampling
All dissolved oxygen (DO) sampling activities were conducted 8 and 9 August 1992
and included CTD casts and Niskin bottle water sampling. Profiles were completed at one
station over the D/S mound (200 SW) and one station at each of the three reference areas
(Figure 2-9). In addition, surface and near-bottom water samples were collected at each
DO Station and subjected to Winkler titration to verify the CTD values.
A Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc., Model SBE 19-01 CTD equipped with a centrifugal
pump and a SBE 13 Dissolved Oxygen Sensor was used to collect water column and near
bottom water quality data (temp, salinity, pressure, density, dissolved oxygen
concentrations). The CTD was allowed to equilibrate in ambient surface water for two
minutes before performing a cast. The descent rate was controlled to yield sufficient data
for each 1 meter horizon within the water column. As the CTD probe approached the
bottom, the unit was allowed to rest approximately 1 meter above the seafloor for a period
of one or more minutes before beginning the ascent. Upon retrieval from the water, data
was downloaded to a Toshiba® 3200T personal computer for analysis.
Water samples were taken simultaneously with the CTD DO profile. A pair of 5-
liter Niskin bottles were tripped one meter below the air-water interface and one meter
above the sediment-water interface. A 300 ml subsample was taken from each Niskin
bottle, preserved, and titrated within twelve hours using the modified Winkler titration
(Strickland and Parsons 1972; Parsons et al. 1984). During routine quality assurance
review of the data, it was determined that the dissolved oxygen sensor on the CTD was
experiencing a malfunction that resulted in erroneous readings. Therefore, only the
Winkler titration DO determinations are presented in this report.
The measurements obtained over two days during the August 1992 survey provide a
very limited, “snapshot” view of dissolved oxygen conditions within the disposal site and
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
NEW LONDON 1992 A. Station Location |
Station Designations DO Dissolved Oxygen Station
7% 5
® | 400N a
300N
200N
A
200NW 200NE
A 100N SOOEN
1OONW a
he A, fe __
41°16.25'N 400W soow 200W 100W cTR 100E 200E 300E
100SW 100SE
| 100S A
200SW 200SE A
€ DO A 400ESE
IS A SOOESE
300SE A.
7 N
A... 300SSE 400SE
) Meters 300 A A, we
400SSE
A... i
A 600SE
41°16,00'N A, SOOSSE
S
(Note: Reference Areas Are Not To Scale)
Figure 2-9. Locations selected for water column (CTD) profiles, as well as near surface
and near bottom water samples for dissolved oxygen concentrations during
the August 1992 field operations
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
42
at the reference areas. Continuous monitoring over the course of several weeks or months
was determined to be much more useful for interpreting possible correlations between
bottom-water DO concentrations and benthic habitat quality. By examining the longer-
term trends in bottom water DO concentrations, conclusions related to any degradation
over time or irregularities in benthic recolonization at NLDS could be based on localized
(dredged material related) or regional (seasonal hypoxia) effects.
The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) sponsors a
comprehensive DO monitoring program within Long Island Sound. Water quality data are
collected from 18 stations on a bi-weekly basis throughout the year. As summer
approaches and hypoxic conditions begin to impact Long Island Sound, the program
intensifies its sampling efforts by incorporating a total of 48 stations. These data were
made available to the DAMOS Program for the 1995 and subsequent surveys to document
the trends in bottom-water DO concentrations and evaluate REMOTS® sediment-profile
photography results relative to this information. Therefore, DAMOS did not conduct its
own DO monitoring at the site after 1992.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
M.St2'90 22
M.€¢1°90 cL
M.220'90 oe
M.S82'S0 o22
M.2S8°S0 .c2
M,826'S0 oc
M.000'90 .22
M,000'90 .22
M,000'90 .22
M.000'90 oc
M,.000'90 .22
M,000'90 oc
M.000'90 oc
M,S+9'€0 ocd
M.€¢S'€0 oe
M.2Zb'€0 oe
M.SBL'€0 22
M.2S2'€0 0&2
M.82€'€0 022
M.00b'€0 022
M.O0b'€0 022
M.00¢'€0 o22
M.00b'€0 oc
M.00b'€0 .22
M.00b'€0 o22
M.€90°90 22 | N.€81 9! ott 9 LVLS
M.€96'90 .c2 | N.€81 91 obb Silvis M.00¢'€0 oc
M.68'SO ocd | N.ZZ1'91 oth | EL LWLS M.+26'S0 .22 M.910°90 22 | N.ELZ9L ob Pv LVLS M.000'90 oc M,Sb2'20 02
M.826'S0 22 | N.00Z9! ob | Zt 1VLS N.902'91 ob b M.¥91'90 22 | N.SSL9L oP € 1VLS N,00¢°91 ob PY M.€¢1'20 cL
M.+S8°SO eZ | N.LEE9t oe | LE LVLS L661 M.068'S0 .cZ | N.8S2'91 oth c'1VLS S661 M.220°20 o22
M.S@6'SO .cZ_| N.80Z 9! oy | Ol LIS 43uY LSSM M.¥S0'90 2 | N.ELZ9! ob bLVLS 43uY LSSM M.S82'40 o2Z
M.¥S2'€0 2 | N.SZ9'9I ob | 6 LVIS M.v¥2'€0 cL | N.OEL9L ob | SG 1VLS M.2S8°10 22
M.PPS'E0 cL | N.€69°9I bb | 8 LVIS N.+2€°€0 ocZ M.062'€0 2 | N.ZLZ 91 obb | b'LVLS NM.00P'€0 .c2 M.826'10 oc
M.O9€'€0 22 | N.S9L'91 ob | LLVLS N.989°91 obY M .60¢'€0 22 | N.2S99l ob | ELVIS N.089°91 ov M.000°20 oc
M .€2€'€0 .c2 | N.P89'9l oh | 9 LVIS 2661 M.¥98'€0 2 | N.Z69°91 oth | 2 LVLS S66L M,000'20 .2Z
M.£be'€0 22
M .8€8°20 oc
N.€99'91 obb
N.29S°91 obb
S‘1VLS
bv LVLS
d3u SN
N.+26°10 022
M ..00'€0 oc
M .810°20 o22
N.189°91 obb
N 62291 obb
b1VLS
bv LVLS
43uY 3N
M,000'Z0 22
M.000'ZO .22
M.000°20 o22
M.S68'10 .%2 | N.S69'91 bb | © LVLS N.999'91 ol M.966'10 22 | N.4S9°91 bb | ELVIS N,099°91 bb M.000'ZO .22
M .9b0'2Z0 22 | N.89S°91 bh | 2 1V1S 2661 M.201'20 22 | N.LES9L ob @'1V1S S661 M.000°20 oc
M.£96'10.c2 | N.202 91 .bb | | iVIS jay NOIN M_.266'10 22 | N.Z99°91 ob b1V1S 43Y NOIN M.000°20 .22
N.002'91 ob
N.002°91 obb
N.002'91 oP
N.002°91 ob b
N,002'9} obP
N,002'91 ob b
N.8€0'91 obP
N.Z60'91 ob
N.OPE OL OFP
N.Z9€°91 ob P
N.80€'91 oP
N.pS2'9! obb
N.002'91 ob
N.089°91 ob P
N.089'91 oth
N.089°91 bP
N.089'91 oLb
N.089°91 ob P
N.089°91 obb
N.81S'9L obP
N.22S°9} ob Ph
N.929°91 obb
N. 289 ob Ph
N.882°91 obb
N.PEZ Ol oP
N.089'9} ob
N.099°91 oLb
N.099°9} obP
N,099'91 obP
N.099°91 oP
N.099°91 obP
N.099°91 obP
N.86¢'91 oth
N.2SS°91 ob
N,909°9} ob P
N.228'9} obb
N.892'91 olb
N-PLZ OL obb
N.099°91 ob
M,.000'90 22
N.002'91 obP
c66L
dau LSSM
M.00¢'€0 oc
N.089°91 oLb
c66L
d3uY SN
MOOE
Mo0e
MOOL
300€
3002
300b
Sooe
$002
Sool
Nooe
Nooz
NoO-L
= BRS)
M.000°20 oc
N.099'91 obP
c66L
43yY NOIN
esaVvNn ZZQVN
L661
S9jJVUIP100Z SUOTIIEIS gS LOWAU
S¥aIY 99U9.19J2Y SQ’IN
6-C P92 L
spnnbuey [emer [wong | eay | | eenntuoy | epmnei | uones | eery | | epriguoi | epmney__| ones | _eoy
LcQVN
Z66L
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
44
3.0 RESULTS
3.1 D/S and NL-91 Disposal Mounds
3.1.1 Bathymetry
The August 1992 precision bathymetric survey showed a minimum depth of 13.0 m
over the NL-Relic mound to the north and a maximum depth of 23.5 m along the southern
edge of the survey area (Figure 3-1). Ata contour interval of 0.25 m, the seven inactive
disposal mounds located within the New London Disposal Site (NL-RELIC, NL-I, NL-II,
NL-III, NL-85, NL-88, and NL-TR) were clearly defined.
The August 1992 bathymetric survey was performed following the placement of
capping dredged material (CDM) associated with the Dow/Stonington project. A
comparison of this survey with the baseline survey of June 1991 (conducted prior to any
placement of either UDM or CDM) resulted in detection of an irregularly shaped mound
approximately 500 m in diameter (Figure 3-2). The depth difference plot revealed a
mound complex with four distinct peaks. Two of the larger peaks, with heights of 0.7 m
and 0.5 m, corresponded to the placement of the D/S and NDA buoys (NDA-91-1 and
NDA-91-2) . The NL-91 and D/S mound complex is composed of 8,800 m? of material
deposited at the NDA buoy from 26 September 1991 to 22 January 1992. The other two
peaks, approximately 250 m east-northeast of the D/S buoy, had mound heights of 0.5 m
and 0.4 m. These mounds were developed over the southwestern flank of the historic NL-
III mound, and spread into the slightly deeper areas between the NL-III and NL-85
mounds. They were connected to the western lobe of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex
by a narrow ridge of dredged material.
In December 1991, a bathymetric survey was performed for the Dow Chemical
Company by Ocean Surveys Incorporated, Old Saybrook, CT. This “precap” survey,
conducted following the placement of UDM but before the placement of CDM, covered a
940 m X 840 m area centered on the D/S buoy (Figure 3-3). By incorporating this precap
survey into the existing SAIC data set, a mound development time-series was produced.
This time-series data set provided a perspective on the placement of material and resulting
changes in bathymetry.
The Ocean Surveys Incorporated bathymetry data were re-gridded to a 500 m X
670 m area along with SAIC's June 1991 and August 1992 bathymetric surveys to focus
the depth difference analysis. Close examination of the June 1991 bathymetry showed a
relatively flat area with no major topographic features capable of influencing the
distribution or spread of material within the immediate vicinity of the disposal points
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
August 1992 Bathymetric Survey
41° 16.500°N
41° 16.250°N
41° 16.000
72° 05.000W 72°04.750W 72°04500W 72°04.250W 72° 04.000 W
Buoy Positions
NDA-91-1 26 Sept - 27 Nov 1991 Depth in meters
NDA-91-2 27 Nov 1991 - 22 Jan 1992 NAD 27
NDA-91-3 22 Jan - 10 Apr 1992
NDA-91-4 10 Apr - 1 June 1992 a
Om 200m 400m
D/S 27 Nov 1991 - 15 Jan 1992 (missing)
Figure 3-1. Bathymetric contour plot of the 1600 m x 1600 m survey area over the New
London Disposal Site, August 1992. A 0.25 m contour interval shows current
and relic disposal mounds
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
46
Depth Difference
August 1992 vs. August 1991 Bathymetry
Total Accumulation of Dredged Material
over the NL91 and Dow/Stonington Disposal Mounds
41° 16.500°N
41° 16.250'N 74
41° 16.000°N
NDA-91-1 26 Sept - 27 Nov 1991
NDA-91-2 27 Nov 1991 - 22 Jan 1992
NDA-91-3 22 Jan - 10 Apr 1992
NDA-91-4 10 Apr - 1 June 1992
Mound Height in meters
NAD 27
———
Om 200m 400m
| D/S 27 Nov 1991 ¢ 15 Jan 1992 (missing)
Figure 3-2. Bathymetric contour plot of depth differences between the June 1991 and
August 1992 surveys in the vicinity of the Dow/Stonington mound, complete
with plotted positions of the 1991-1992 disposal buoys, 0.1 m contour interval,
depth in meters
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
47
Ocean Surveys, Inc.
December 1991 Bathymetry
41° 16.300° N
41° 16.200° N
41° 16.100° N
41° 16.000° N
72° 04.600° W 72° 04.500° W 72° 04.400°W 72° 04.300° W 72° 04.200° W
NLDS
Depth in meters
NAD 27
ki ~=— oC aa)
Om 100 m 200 m
Figure 3-3. Bathymetric contour plot of the 940 m x 840 m survey conducted at the New
London Disposal Site by Ocean Surveys Incorporated in December 1991,
0.5 m contour interval
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 — 1998
48
(Figure 3-4). Depth difference calculations between SAIC's June 1991 and OSI's
December 1991 surveys showed the accumulation of dredged material to a thickness of 1.0
m around the D/S and NDA buoy locations (Figure 3-5; Appendix A1).
According to the DAMOS disposal logs, the Gwen Mor Marina and Port Niantic
material was repeatedly deposited south and east of the NDA #1 and #2 buoy locations.
The majority of Dow Chemical Company and Stonington Harbor UDM was reportedly
disposed on the eastern side of the D/S buoy, consistent with the depth difference plot.
The smaller mounds (0.4 to 0.8 m high) to the east of the larger deposit probably represent
Gwen Mor Marina and Port Niantic dredged material released while the NDA #1 buoy was
off-station, due to contact with a U.S. Navy submarine.
Comparisons were then made between the re-gridded August 1992 postcap
bathymetric survey performed by SAIC (Figure 3-6) and Ocean Survey Incorporated’s
December 1991 precap survey. The depth difference calculations showed the buildup of
CDM to a maximum thickness of 0.8 m approximately 350 m to the east of the D/S buoy,
with increases in depth of CDM up to 20-40 cm throughout the survey area (Figure 3-7).
It appears much of the CDM dredged from the Dow Chemical Company's Allyns Point
facility was actually released somewhat east of the UDM deposit (Figure 3-8). As a result,
the final, irregularly shaped bottom feature was formed by the coalescing of three sediment
deposits (NDA suitable material, D/S UDM, and D/S CDM; Figure 3-9).
Detailed analysis of the 1995 and 1997 bathymetric surveys showed no significant
difference in the size or shape of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex since 1992. Given
the low profile of the capped mound as detected in August 1992, large-scale consolidation
of the sediment deposit was not anticipated.
3.1.2 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
In the August 1992 sediment-profile photography survey over the NL-91 and D/S
mound complex, 41 stations were occupied to examine surface sediment composition,
document benthic recolonization, and delineate the aerial extent of the disposal mound
apron. Follow-on surveys in August 1995, September 1997, and July 1998 consisted of a
truncated 13-station grid to facilitate long-term monitoring. A complete set of REMOTS®
image analysis results for these four surveys is presented in Appendix B; the survey results
are summarized below.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
49
SAIC June 1991 Bathymetry
Area of Concentrated Analysis over
the Dow/Stonington Disposal Mound
41° 16.300° N
41° 16.200° N
41° 16.100° N
72° 04.600°W 72°04.500°W 72° 04.400°W 72°04.300°W 72° 04.200° W
LDS
Corrected to MLW
Depth in meters
NAD 27
Ti
Om 100m 200 m
Figure 3-4. Bathymetric contour plot of the June 1991 survey conducted by SAIC, re-
gridded to a 500 m x 670 m analysis area, 0.5 m contour interval, depth in
meters
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
Depth Difference
SAIC June 1991 vs. Ocean Surveys, Inc.
December 1991 Bathymetry
41° 16.300° N Gwen Mor Marina
Port Niantic, Inc
41° 16.200° N
aie own of Stonington
Cont
41° 16.100° N
72° 04.600° W 72° 04.500°W 72°04.400°W 72°04.300° W 72° 04.200° W
NLDS
Mound Height in meters
NAD 27
I Las
Om 100 m 200 m
Figure 3-5. Bathymetric contour plot of the depth differences between the SAIC June
1991 and OSI December 1991 surveys showing accumulation of dredged
material at the precap stage of development, 0.2 m contour interval
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
51
SAIC August 1992 Bathymetry
Area of Concentrated Analysis over
the Dow/Stonington Disposal Mound
41° 16.300"
41° 16.200°
41° 16.100°
72° 04.600° W 72°04.500 W 72°04.398° W 72° 04.3027) W 72° 04.200° W
DS
Corrected to MLW
Depth in meters
NAD 27
a S|
Om 100 m 200 m
Figure 3-6. Bathymetric contour plot of the August 1992 survey conducted by SAIC, re-
gridded to a 500 m x 670 m analysis area, 0.5 m contour interval, depth in
meters
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
Depth Difference
SAIC August 1992 vs. Ocean Surveys Inc.
December 1991 Bathymetry
41° 16.300° N
41° 16.200° N
41° 16.100° N
72° 04.602. W 72° 04.500°W 72°04.398°W 72° 04.3027 W 72° 04.200° W
NLDS
Mound Height in meters
NAD 27
EE
Om 100m 200 m
Figure 3-7. Bathymetric contour plot of the depth differences between the SAIC August
1992 and OSI December 1991 surveys showing accumulation of CDM at the
postcap stage of development, 0.2 m contour interval
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
53
Sediment Deposits
Composing the NL-91 and D/S Mounds
(Survey
41° 16.300°N ‘Arti ct
41° 16.200°N
vn of Stonington\— |
sw Chemical Co.
vi
41° 16.100°N
i‘
72° 04.600W 72°04.500W 72°04.400W 72°04.300W 72° 04.200 W
DM thickness in meters
NAD 27
Figure 3-8. Depth difference comparison displaying the sediment deposits formed during
the 1991-92 disposal season. Gray shading represents sediment placed prior to
mid-December 1991. Yellow shading represents sediment deposited from mid-
December to mid-January 1992. It is likely that many of the smaller areas of
apparent accumulation surrounding the central deposit are the result of survey
artifacts and are considered artificial.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
SAIC August 1992 vs. SAIC June 1991 Bathymetry
Total Accumulation of Dredged Material
over the Dow/Stonington Disposal Mound
NL-Il]
41° 16.300°N Su rvey
Artifact
41° 16.200°N
41° 16.100°N
72° 04.600°W 72°04.500;W 72°04.400W 72°04.300W 72° 04.200W
NLDS
Mound Height in meters
NAD 27
S|
Om 100m 200 m
Figure 3-9. Bathymetric contour plot of the depth difference between the SAIC August
1992 and SAIC June 1991 surveys showing total accumulation of dredged
material within the 500 m x 670 m analysis area, 0.2 m contour interval
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
55
3.1.2.1 August 1992 Survey
REMOTS® photographs detected recently deposited dredged material extending
400 m south, and 500 m southeast of the survey center (Figure 3-10). The majority of the
material deposited in close proximity to the D/S buoy was composed of black silty sand
with a varying silt-clay fraction. Dredged material layers with chaotic sedimentary fabrics,
anomalous grain size distributions, and low optical reflectance were presumed to be
recently deposited or “fresh” (1991-1992 disposal season) dredged material. Boundaries
for the distribution of the fresh dredged material were determined by mapping the spread
of the darker NDA-91 and D/S material relative to the lighter and biologically re-worked,
historic dredged material of the inactive NL-III, NL-88, and NL-85 mounds (Figure 3-11).
Differentiation between unsuitable dredged material and cap material through
REMOTS® photography was difficult due to the similar lithology of the Dow Chemical
sediments. However, a layer of high optical reflectance fine sand originating from the
material deposited at the NDA-91 buoy was visible at stations extending to 100 m north,
400 m south, 400 m west, and 500 m east of the survey center (Figure 3-12). The depth
of the overlying sand varied from 1.27 cm to 7.03 cm at stations 100N and the grid center,
respectively.
At peripheral portions of the survey, there was a noticeable lack of fine sand at
stations 300SE through 500SE and all the ESE stations, as well as stations 200N, 400N,
500S, 5OOSSE, 600E, 200NE, and 100NE (Figure 3-10). The sediment profiles of these
stations consisted of thin layers of reworked dredged material over black silt (Figure 3-13).
The majority of REMOTS® survey stations had layers of fresh or historic dredged material
thicker than the penetrating depth of the REMOTS® camera. The detection of ambient
sediments was not anticipated based upon the location of the REMOTS® grid relative to the
historic NLDS disposal mounds.
The major modal grain size over the disposal site ranged from granule/coarse sand
(-1.0 phi) to very fine silt and clay sized particles (phi sizes >4; Figure 3-14). The
coarsest sediment, consisting of very coarse and coarse sands, was located at the survey
center, and stations within 300 m south and 100 m east (Table 3-1). As expected,
REMOTS® camera prism penetration depth was lowest at those stations with a surface
sediment layer consisting of coarser grained sands, granules, and shell.
Silt-clay (>4 phi) was the dominant grain size major mode at 17 of the 41
REMOTSS® stations occupied. These stations typically showed a distinct stratigraphy in
which a surface layer of medium and fine sand (1-2 phi) was overlying very fine silts and
clay (24 phi; Figure 3-14). The most frequently observed sediment was very fine sand
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
56
‘(uBis< ayy Aq payesipu}) sseuy9)4) JeAe] jeuayewW PaBpasp jo ajew)jse wWnwiu|wW e s} UMOYS eNnjeA UeESW ey) UAL) ‘Sa}ed|\daJ OAY
1829] je uj ydep UoNenaued Wsud ay) papasoxe jevajew paBpaup J] “uONe)s yoea ye pazAjeue pue poujeyqo seBew} a}e0)\de) E=u Jo) SUeAW ase UMOYS SAN|eA ,.
1 e6aS
ii eBe)S
1 8621S NO II aBe1S
i e6e1S NO 1 eBeISs
<- | a6e1S
1 a6eIs
1a6eSs
i 621g NO | 8Be1S
1aBbeis
I e6e1S NO 11 e6e1S
assoos
9s900S
8SS00P
9S300P7
8S00r
SO00r
u00y
eUa00F
800F
Orme tnon
L30NI
1 abeS
1 eBeys
1eBeis
I 28e)g NO | aBe1S
I 86e)S NO | eBeIS
|aBeis
1) 62S
1 abeS
11 8621S
1 abeIs
I aBeIg NO | eBeis
i Bas
IL 2621S NO 11 eBeISs
I aBels NO | aBeIs
i a6e1S NO | eBeIS
i e6e1S NO 1 aBe\s
}aBbeis
|aBeis
@Ssooe
8SO0E
SOOE
U00e
auagoe
NK NMMNN
(wo) — ueew (iy)
ssouyBnoy | uejpewiso | ueeWISO |ePoW Jofew
Auepunog 3 azjs ujeI
weasald
aBeys yseyB}H
ena pabpeg ueew sseuyojy. pera u0}}e907 Boly Ju
im sdoy /punow
jeuojsseoons TOnenarN leyayew peBpag esoweg
AVAING ZGGT 24} LOZ ArCUMUING synsoy AYdeasojoY_ a1Jo1g-JUIUIIPIS gS LOWAY Xedwo0D punoy] S/q pue 16-IN
T-€ dB :
ng Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
itor.
Mon
57
Sediment Composition as detected with
REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
41° 16.500°N
41° 16.250°N
SS
\
~~
‘
ir
pad. Lhe
eh
\ / {~~ SRB
/ Sa Cee \
eh \
Su
. SS Zon ON
SUL OS Survey Attitact a
41° 16.000'N
72 05.000°W 72°04.750W 72°04.500W 72°04.250°W 72° 04.000 W
Sediment Composition
FS - Fine Sand
MS - Medium Sand
CS - Coarse Sand
SSt - Sandy Silt
BSt - Black Silt
Disposal Buoy
Location
Material
Figure 3-10. Distribution map of surface sediment type over fresh and/or historic dredged
material in the vicinity of the new NL-91 and D/S mound at NLDS
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
58
Extent of Disposal Mound Aprons
Based on REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
== = Cen eee) a
oes Survey oe WW ( : =
ia dy ya) cay ZZ NOS \ oa
; mem Ne Wit jf eS) Ty >) We es U
41° 16.500°N A _NRELIC (0g) A
41° 16.250'N+3;
Zz aN
\~4 =~ 4
~~ = A 4
~~ \ °
Ya NS
41° 16.000°N :
ie ~~ Recently Bepositéd
ss ges see eas nei
—, S\ Ne yy : \
\ SYR
WSN LLL = SF OE Survey beitect
72° 05.000°'W 3=72°04.750W 72°04.500W 72°04.250W 72° 04.000°;W
Figure 3-11. Countour lines based on sediment stratigraphy as detected with REMOTS®
sediment-profile photography
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
[eLloyeul pospolp Ysodj JoA0 Jae] pues ev Sunsidap SQQz UOTIEIS Jo Ydeisojoyd @SLOWAY ‘TI-€ WANs
wo0r wo0z wo
—
M.000'0 ZZ M.0S2'P0 o22 M.005'P0 .22 M.0S2'P0 022 NM.000'S0 o%2 AL0SZ'S0 ZL
.OS2'Sb obb
‘NLOOO'SL bP
N.0S2'9b ob¥
Pld Gurjdwes
AydesBoyoud 2]4014-JUaUIPeS @S.LONSY Z66L
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
60
[elLioyeW pospoip Ysod] JOAO
[eLIoleW posposp poyxlomal AT[eorBojorg Jo Joey e SuNoidep Fsooe uoneis Jo ydeisojoyd @SLOWANA “EI-€ ens
WO0b wo0Z WoO
— |
N.000'F0 wel N.0SZ'b0 o22 M.00S'P0 o22 MOSZ'V0 022 M.000'S0 22 AL0S2'S0 2
OSZ'SL ol¥
.000'9b bv
N.O92'9L obP
N.008°91 ol?
N.O9Z'9b ob?
Aa\r)\
Pus) Burjdwies
Aydes60j;0Ud a|jOJq-JUSWIPSS @S.LOWAY Z6S/
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
61
Major Modal Grain Size as detected with
REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
——— = Z
= ‘ = \ <S8) ° AN
ee
ea SL _i{ K \
41° 16.500'°N
41° 16.250°N
3S
oa >4.. W ea ;
~~ Revehtly DF
——Bretiged Ntatérial
(Black SiIty\ \_/
ee
41° 16.000°N
Disposal Buoy
Location
A
Major Modal
Grain Size (phi)
Figure 3-14. Spatial distribution of major modal grain size for the 1992 REMOTS®
sediment-profile photography stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound
complex
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
62
(3-4 phi), with many replicate images displaying small pebbles and recently dredged shells
within a sandy matrix. These sediments were found extending out to 400 m west, 500 m
east and south, and 200 m southwest of the NL-91 center. Isolated pockets of fine sand
were found 300 m north, as well as 600 m south and 600 m southeast (Figure 3-14).
Station 400S, lying on a relatively steep bathymetric slope, displayed evidence of a harder
bottom with shell, pebble, and hydrozoan growth at the sediment water interface (Figure 3-
5).
Within NLDS, mean boundary roughness values ranged from 0.4 cm to 3.1 cm.
Two stations on the mound flanks, 1|OONW and 100SE, showed the highest roughness
values of 2.6 cm and 3.1 cm (Table 3-1). Seventy-eight percent of the stations at the
disposal site were classified as having a biological boundary roughness, while 22 percent
had a physical boundary roughness. Ninety-four percent of the reference stations had a
biological boundary roughness while six percent were physical in nature.
The mean apparent RPD depths at NLDS ranged from 0.3 cm at Stations 5OOSE
and 600ESE to 3.7 cm at Station 200NW with a majority (33%) of stations exhibiting RPD
depths within the 1.5 to 2.0 cm range (Figure 3-16; Table 3-1). No evidence of a redox
rebound layer (recent reduction in the depth of oxidized sediments) was detected in any
REMOTS® image collected during the 1992 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound
complex.
In general, the area surrounding the D/S mound showed strong signs of benthic
community recovery with a diverse population of Stages I, II, and III assemblages (Figure
3-17). Twenty-five of the forty-one stations sampled displayed some combination of Stage
I, Il, or III assemblages (Table 3-1). Eight stations displayed healthy Stage I populations
progressing to Stage II. Stage II was denoted by the presence of distinct tubes of the
amphipod Ampelisca sp. at the sediment surface (Figure 3-18). Three stations (7%)
exhibited Stage II individuals colonizing the surface sediment while Stage III assemblages
were actively feeding in the layers below the sediment-water interface. Finally, six
stations had representatives from all three end-member assemblages present in the
REMOTS® photographs.
Eight stations (20%), including the survey center, had Stage I individuals inhabiting
the sediments over a population of Stage III organisms (Figure 3-17). Apparently, by
occupying the sub-surface sediment layers, Stage III individuals (deposit feeders) were able
to survive a modest disposal event and migrate up through the thin layer (0.2 m to 0.3 m)
of newly deposited sediment. Fifteen of the remaining REMOTS® stations sampled
possessed an exclusive population of Stage I (27%) or Stage II (10%) individuals.
Exclusive Stage I populations were found at eleven stations. Stations 200 m south and
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
[eloyeul
pasporp payxJoMal J9AO [Jays pue s[qqed jo s1oAey Be BuNIdap SOO UOHeIS Jo ydessojoyd @SLOWAU ‘ST-€ dns
woop wodz wo
— |
N.000'V0 22 N00SZ'P0 22 NL00S'P0 ZZ A.OSZ'P0 oZZ M.000'S0 022 M.0SZ2'S0 22
OSZ'SL obl¥
~
(UES Hoe}
uae peipwd
pars odag Af
000'SL ob?
N.OS2'9b ob
N.005°S/ oL¥
N.O9Z'9b ob
rAa\)\
pu Burjdwies
AydesBoyoug 3]401q4-}UEWIPSS @SLOWSY Z661
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
64
Apparent RPD Depth as detected with
REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
/
eo a Ve
a Su rvey A antige =
41° 16.500°N
44° 16.250°N+- |)
\) i /,) i Oe Wf
Vay l( on wt “Breck silt) < GZ W/ HS
41° 16.000°'N=~ \AWAAS / \ f SS / Bud, a 4
5 em J ~: Le ecently Deposit
= ——P ee
Nas SS lec ksit
=
\\ a Overall average Ac”
0 ( 1.29,
S {
St
-Su rvey Artifact _ assed ]
72° 05.000°W 72°04.750W 72°04.500W 72°04.250W 72° 04.000 W
e Disposal Buoy
Location
A
RPD
Figure 3-16. Spatial distribution of Redox Potential Discontinuity depths for the 1992
REMOTS8® stations on the disposal mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
65
Successional Stage as detected with
REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
L So C @ AR sy ( we \ 2
— Survey rAritaet \\ \
Va \ ) EX WN
41° 16.500°N
if
S Ar / \
RAW SA. ee ~~ h aati in tt ame
41° 16.250/N4+< | ak re Hd ps attra: } tin
hh = < SSS s| is IN 8 aoe
CALE a at LAW TM
41° 16.000°N
72° 05.000W 72°04.750W 72°04.500W 72°04.250;W 72° 04.000°W
@ Disposal Buoy
Location
Successional Stage
Figure 3-17. Spatial distribution map of successional stage status for the NL-91 and D/S
mound complex
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
[elia}eW pospoip Yysoy SuIzIUO]ODeI ‘ds vosyadup podiydure Burjjamp
-2qn} 94} JO SuNsIsuod AWIUNWIWOD TJ a3e1g AyTeoy ev SuNDIdep |FSoog uoneIS Jo ydeisoj}0ud @SLOWAU ‘SI-¢ ens
wO0pv wode wo
— os |
N.000'0 022 M.052'H0 o22 M.005'P0 02 M.0SZ'P0 22 M.000'S0 022 M.0S2'S0 ZL
-000°91 ob
N.OSZ'9} ob
N.008°9} Lv
S GAL Ss
Iv
ae
LCOYN
PUD Buryjdureg
AydesBojoyd 3]yO1q-JUBWIPES @S.LOWSY 266}
N.OSZ'9L obP
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
67
200 m, 300 m, and 400 m southeast of the survey center were inhabited solely by Stage II
assemblages. One station (300W) produced no benthic infauna data due to shallow camera
penetration depths. Because of the diversity in benthic infaunal recolonization status of the
disposal mound and the widespread presence of Stage II organisms, the overall
successional stage of the disposal mound can be characterized as a solid Stage II population
advancing to Stage III.
Based in part on the relatively advanced successional status and moderate RPD
depths, the median OSI values over the disposal site ranged from +2.0 to +8.0 (Figure 3-
19; Table 3-1). The higher OSI values were found on the perimeter of the REMOTS®
sampling grid and were randomly distributed. No methane or low DO conditions were
observed in any of the replicate images. __
See 222 August 1995 Survey
The August 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile survey at the NL-91 and D/S mound
complex was used to map the aerial extent of dredged material and determine benthic
recolonization levels relative to the 1992 findings. The REMOTS® sampling grid occupied
in 1995 was reduced to a modified 13-station cross grid and shifted south-southeast relative
to the 1992 grid (Figures 2-4A and 2-4B). The center point was based on the D/S buoy
position, and station placement was designed to cover the two lobate sections of the NL-91
and D/S mound complex.
Recently deposited dredged material was detected in nine of the thirteen REMOTS®
sediment-profile stations across the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. Dredged material
thickness was greater than camera penetration along the east-west transect, as well as at
stations 100S and 100N (Figure 3-20). The surface sediments at Stations 300N, 200N,
100W, and 200S appear to have been reworked significantly since 1992, losing the typical
characteristics of recently deposited sediments. As a result, these stations were classified
as being composed of historic dredged material. The average penetration depths ranged
from 4.5 cm to 15.1 cm. The stations with the shallowest camera penetration (< 10 cm)
displayed sediment with a higher sand component. Most of the stations with camera
penetration greater than 10 cm had dredged material greater than penetration.
The major modal grain size at eight of thirteen stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound
complex was classified as 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand; Table 3-2). Three stations (100E, 400E,
and 300N) were composed entirely of fine-grained sediments (>4 phi; silt/clay). The two
stations with coarser grained sediment were 200W (3 to 2 phi, fine sand) and 200S (<-1 phi,
granules and pebbles; Figure 3-21). A stratigraphic pattern consisting of a surface layer of
very fine sand overlaying mud at depth was observed at all stations except 100W, 100N,
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
ive)
‘o
‘(uBis< ay) Aq payeoipul) ssauyoiu) JaAe] jeleyew pabpap jo ayewijsa wWNwiuILW e S| UMOYS aNjeA UBB By) Ud) ‘Sayeo!|des ony
}sea] je ul ydap uo}ejoued WslJd ey) papesoxe jejeje pabpaip J] "uoNe}s yoRe ye pazAjeue pue pauleyqo sebew! a}eo1\de1 g=u 10} SUeaW O1e UMOUS San|e/ ,.
‘uonesjaued uey) Ja}e916 aq 0} paullUJajap pue sabew! 9}ed!\de1 Bey) JO QUO UI pa}Oa}Ep jeleyeW pebpaig ,
i NO ll Ls
il! NO 1s
il! NO ll 1s
ll NO ll 1s
ll NO il LS
i NO ll Ls
it NO ll 4S
i NO ll LS
it NO 1s
NO Ls
i! NO Wt 1s
il! NO ll 4s
ll NO I Ls
(wo) (1ud)
uea uelpayy apon
ssauyBnoy| Iso Jofey
yuasald
abejs
yS@yBIH
Asepunog aZIS UleI5
jUuaSald
sabes
jeuoissaoons
(wi)
ueai
UO}eIJBUBd
elaweyg
uo1}e907
S/d 8 L6-1N
S/d 8 +6-1N
S$/G 8 L6-1N
S/d 8 L6-1N
S/d 8 L6-1N
S/d 8 L6-1N
S/G 8 L6-1N
$/G 8 L6-1N
$/ 8 L6-1N
S/G 8 L6-1N
S/d 8 L6-1N
$/ 8 L6-1N
$/G8 16-1N
ealy
‘Jey /punow
AIAING SEG 24} 10J AteUTUING syNsoy AYydeisoj0Yg IJO1g-JUIUNPIS oS LOWAY X2e[du0d punoy] $/q pue 16-IN
CE NGL
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
69
OSI values as calculated
from 1992 REMOTS® Images
\.
SSeS Saye nract a
Fae
at a a
y) /
41° 16.500°N
41° 16.250°'N-+
. AEE si \
Se ~ Recefitlhy Deposi ited
-—~_\ ~~ Dretiged Material
— Ta ee Silt)
72° 05.000°W 72°04.750W 72°04.500°W 72°04.250°W 72° 04.000°W
Disposal Buoy
Location
A
Os!
Figure 3-19. Distribution map of Organism Sediment Index (OSI) values over the NL-91
and D/S mound complex as detected in the August 1992 REMOTS®
sediment-profile photography survey
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
70
1991 vs. 1992 Depth Difference
Mean Dredged Material Thickness as detected
by REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
41° 16.4007
41° 16.300'N
41° 16.200'N
41° 16.100°
Recently Deposited
Dredged Material
(Black Silt)
AL? AGOGO RS ee Rd Nett cre coe te keen ob
72° 04.600°W 72° 04500°W 72° 04 400°W 72° 04.300'°W 72° 04.200;W 72° 04.100'W
NLDS
Mound Height in meters
NAD 27
a
Om 100m 200m
ncm - Mean Dredged Material thickness
CP - DM thickness > REMOTS®
Camera Penetration
Figure 3-20. Mean dredged material thickness at 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile
photography stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the
August 1992 detectable margins
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
71
jelioyeul
poSpeip poyxlomel JOAO [Jays pue s[qqod Jo Jade] v SuNoIdap SOOT UOHRIS Jo ydessojoyd @SLOWAY “1Z-€ MANSY
woop wode wo
—
M.000'V0 .cZ MLOSZ'P0 22 M.00S'P0 o22 M.OSZY0 022 M.000'S0 ZL M.0S2'S0 o2L
N.OSZ’SL ob
Tae
N.000°91 ob¥
NLOG2'Sb obv
N.008'91 obv
a) |
eC ee
ra NLOSZ'9L obP
Pug Burjdwes
AydesBoyouyd 3]'jOJd-JUSWIP|S
@SLOIWSY 866} Pue ‘2661 ‘S66L
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
72
200N, and 300N, where the layer of sand may have been incorporated into the sediment or
was obscured by decaying amphipod tube mats.
The range of replicate-averaged boundary roughness values over the 1995 REMOTS®
stations ranged from 0.7 cm to 4.8 cm, with the highest values at 200S (4.8 cm) caused by the
presence of pebbles and shell lag (Table 3-2). Boundary roughness in the majority of the
replicate images that were analyzed was less than 2 cm and often attributed to biogenic
activity.
Replicate averaged RPD values over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex ranged from
nearly 1.0 cm to 3.5 cm, with an overall average of 2.2 cm (Figure 3-22; Table 3-2). The
shallowest RPDs were concentrated along the southern (100S, 200S) and eastern (100E, 300E, —
400E, 500E) legs of the sample grid. The center station (CTR) displayed a relatively deep
RPD of 3.0 cm, however, Station 300N demonstrated the deepest replicate averaged RPD
value of 3.48 cm.
The presence of an RPD rebound layer was noted at several stations (CTR, 100S,
100E, 200E, 300E, 400E, and 500E). This rebound layer is the result of the RPD becoming
shallower within the surface sediment several days to weeks before the REMOTS® sediment-
profile photography survey. The reduction in RPD depth is often related to a decrease in
bottom water DO concentrations, in association with a seasonal increase in oxygen demand
(biological and chemical) within the surface sediments.
Stage III benthic communities were observed in at least one replicate photograph
from all REMOTS® stations over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. The dominant
biological assemblage was Stage II on III as the August 1995 survey results indicated by
the presence of decaying or disturbed amphipod tube mats (Figure 3-23A). At Stations
300E, 300N, and 400E one or two replicates contained only evidence of Stage II organisms
(amphipods). Stage I on III was noted in replicate images from stations nearer the center
of the mound (100E) and historic dredged material off the disposal mound (200N, 100W,
200S; Figures 3-23B and 3-24).
Organism Sediment Index values at the NL-91 and D/S mound complex ranged
‘from +6 to +10, with an overall average of +8.0 (Figure 3-22; Table 3-2). The lowest
OSI value (+6) was calculated for Station 400E primarily due to a shallow RPD depth in
one replicate image, although the area surrounding 400E is still considered quite healthy.
The highest OSI of +10 was generated for Station 200E, reflecting a Stage II on III
successional stage and deep RPD depths in all three replicate images. There was no visible
evidence of low apparent DO levels in the sediment at any of the stations, although
methane gas bubbles were observed in one replicate image at Station 100S.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
1991 vs. 1992 Depth Difference
1995 RPD and OSI values
41° 16.400°N
41° 16.300°N
41° 16.200°N
SS ik
hoy \\, Ms 1.86
QO0E d 49 300) gat 500EA
£4 Hb V A ee 8
\ XS Ss ew]
)
41° 16.100°N
Recently Deposited
Dredged Material
(Black Silt)
72° 04.600°W 72° 04.500°W 72° 04.400°W 72° 04.300°;W 72° 04.200°W 72° 04.100 W
RPD
Station A
OSI
Mound Height in meters
NAD 27
Om 100m 200m
Figure 3-22. Spatial distribution of mean redox potential discontinuity depths over the
NL-91 and D/S mound complex as detected by the 1995 REMOTS®
sediment-profile photography survey, relative to the 1992 detectable margins
of the mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
74
pod
Tube Mat.
Stage Il)
}
U
fi
(
\
Amph
oF
CTC
®
®
LL ‘
ie 4m
(B)
Figure 3-23. REMOTS photographs showing Stage II on Stage III at (A) CTR and Stage I on III at (B) 200N on the
(A)
D/S mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
75
1991 vs. 1992 Depth Difference
Successional Stage
41° 16.400°N
41° 16.300°N
41° 16.200'N x
200A 100WA_ CYR AO” ZOE 2008 A 400E A,
| ee 1 M4 1, uu
@) Oo p |
i
500E A
Hl, Ul
Sand |
' even
41° 16.100'N lack silt =
Recently Deposited
Dredged Material
(Black Silt)
41° 16.000'N- SY Cea) -Gucron ena a sane
72 04.600°W 72° 04.500°W 72°04.400°W 72° 04.300°W 72° 04.200°W 72° 04.100 W
‘StationA NLDS
Successional Stage Mound Height in meters
ee eS i NAD 27
a
Om 100m_200m_
Figure 3-24. Spatial distribution map of successional stage status for the August 1995
REMOTS® sediment-profile photography stations occupied over the NL-91
and D/S mound complex, relative to the detectable margins of the mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
76
Sae23 September 1997 Survey
In September 1997, a second follow-up REMOTS® sediment profile photography
survey was conducted to document the continued benthic recovery over the NL-91 and D/S
mound complex. Station locations were based on the same modified 13-station grid
occupied in August 1995 (Figure 2-4B).
Recent and/or historic dredged material was both detected and greater than the
penetration of the camera prism in all replicates, with averaged thickness ranging from 6.8
to 18.2 cm (overall average of 14.2 cm). The replicate-averaged mean camera penetration
over the mound was somewhat deeper than the previous survey. As a result, the images
displayed more layering of material relative to the 1995 survey, with fine sand over
reworked dredged material, over fine organic silt at several stations (Figure 3-25A).
As in previous years, fine to very fine sand characterized the sediment over the NL-
91 and D/S mound complex (Table 3-3). The major modal grain size was 4 to 3 phi (very
fine sand) in most photographs, with a mix of silt-clay in nine of the 42 images. Station
200W displayed medium-grained sand (2 phi), along with shell fragments and remnants of
decaying amphipod tube mats (Figure 3-25B). Surface sand overlying fine-grained
sediment (sand-over-mud stratigraphy) was noted at every station over the disposal mound.
Granule and pebble sized grains were noted at the sediment-water interface in multiple
replicates collected at Stations 100S and 200S (Figure 3-26A & B).
The replicate-averaged boundary roughness values ranged from 0.6 to 2.2 cm
(Table 3-3). In contrast to samples collected in 1995, boundary roughness was primarily
attributed to physical forces, although some surface disturbances were indeterminant or
caused by biogenic activity. Evidence of physical disturbance of the surface included
abundant disturbed amphipod tube mats, surface scour, and shell lag deposits. Individual
replicates at Stations 200N (a) and 300N (b and c) showed evidence of winnowing of fines
at the sediment surface.
The replicate-averaged apparent RPD ranged from 1.0 to 6.7 cm (4.47 average;
Figure 3-27). Stations 200E, 400E, and 300N had a visible redox rebound layer ranging
from 5 cm to 10 cm below the sediment-water interface, indicating a recent reduction in the
RPD depth.
The successional status was advanced, showing healthy Stage II or Stage II on III
communities inhabiting the sediments of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex (Figure 3-28).
Some of the photographs were identified as Stage I to II due to the presence of disturbed and
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
‘(uBis< ayy Aq payeoipul) ssauyoiu) JaAe| jelayewW pabpoup jo ayewjse wnwiuIW e Ss! UMOYsS anjeA UeAW au; Ud) ‘sayeaI|des OM}
yse9] Je ul yep UOejauad Wusid a4) papesoxe jeajew pabpaup J) “uONe}S yoRe ye pazAjeue pue pauleyqo sabew! a}e01\doJ E=U J0j SUBS aJe UMOUS SAN|eA ,,
iW NO I Ls wt i S/d 8 L6-1N
i NO Ls We i S/d 8 L6-1N
NO Wt Ls TT : S/G 8 L6-1N
Ls Wi S/O 8 L6-1N
NO 1 1S Wl S/O 8 L6-1N
i! NO | LS S/G 8 16-1N
INO I Ls S/d 8 16-1N
it NO Il LS S/G 8 16-1N
Ls S/ 8 16-1N
WwNO W 4s S/ 2 L6-1N
i NO tl LS S/O 8 L6-1N
Ww OL Wis S/d 2 16-1N
NO | LS S/G.8 L6-1N
(wo) uea;, (1yd) juasald IELOVeIN aes (wo) ueay
sseuyBbnoy eee apo; sofew eed (5) pebpeigim baghy
Aiepunog ISO aZIS UIeIS e6e)s 1S9uBIH jeuoisseoons ueOWN dda sdoy jewajyew eiawes 424 /BUNOW
jo saquinn neppeia
ADAING L661 24) A0J AreUIUING synsay AYdessoxoY, afljorg-}UIWIPIg @®SLOWAY X2[dwoD punow] S/d pue 16-1N
€-€ 2198].
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
78
AJaAoodsar “IaXkev] SOVjINS OY} Ul pues poUTess-uINIPsUT
pue SurLoAdey [elioyeu paSpaip Sunoidep (q) MOOT pue (VY) FOOT suoteIg Woy sodeun @SLOWAY L661 “S7-€ BANS
- [eUSTeA
pebpeig —
poylomay
pues oul
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
79
(q) S00z pur (V) SOOT SUOTIEIS xed
[BL19}VUI PSxOMa JOAO SoTqqad Jo 19Av] dovJAns eB SutAvTdsIp
WIOd PUNOU! ¢/(] PUR 16-"IN 9} Je po}oa|]oo soBeu! @SLOWAA L661 “97-€ aaNsty
V
WIS 21219
sa]qqed
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
80
NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex
1997 RPD and OSI Values
woow’s EAs s 0, S00E A, A -500E
4 a P XN - > )
9
Sand _
over
Black silt
Recently Deposited
Dredged Material
(Black Silt)
Overall Average A
8.
NLDS
Mound Height in meters
Figure 3-27. Distribution map of mean RPD (red) and median OSI (blue) values calculated
for the 1997 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the
1992 disposal mound footprint
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
&1
NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex
1997 Successional Stage
WSS
ene
200WA 100WA CTR =p HE tp EN
AA M 1, UJ W AMA AS ‘Ouay he "l, MS
BS i)
Sey eS
over
Black silt >
=> Recently Deposited
Dredged Material
(Black Silt)
Mound Height in meters
_200 m__
Figure 3-28. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1997 survey over the
NL-91 and D/S mound complex, relative to the 1992 disposal mound footprint
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
82
decaying amphipod (Ampelisca) tube mats. Stage III organisms were present in 19 of the 42
replicates and represented at all stations except 300N and 200E.
The median OSI values ranged from +2 to +11, with an overall average of +8.6 for
the entire NL-91 and D/S mound complex (Figure 3-27). The only station displaying a
median OSI value of < +6 (indicating continued disturbance) was Station 300N (OSI +2)
primarily due to the lack of Stage III organisms and shallow RPD depths. Conditions
indicative of low bottom water DO concentrations were observed in sediments at three
stations. One or more of the replicate images collected from stations 100E, 300E, and 300N
displayed shallow RPD depths and dark, sulfidic sediment located at or near the sediment-
water interface, suggesting a recent reduction in available oxygen. However, the presence
of Stage III individuals and moderate to deep RPD depths in other replicate images obtained
from stations 100E and 300E contributed to high OSI values, +10 and +8, respectively.
The highest OSI (+11) was calculated for Stations 100N, 100W, and 200S, reflecting a
Stage II on III successional stage and deep RPD depths in all three replicate images collected
for each station.
3.1.2.4 July 1998 Survey
REMOTS® results from the 1998 survey over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex
were used to document the placement of supplemental cap material during the 1997-1998
disposal season. In addition, REMOTS® sediment-profile photography was used to
evaluate the benthic recolonization over the center of the disposal mound and continue
assessment of the overall recovery of the dredged material deposit. The 13-station
sampling grid established in 1995 was reoccupied, and three replicate photographs were
collected at each station.
Dredged material was detected in layers having a thickness which exceeded the
camera prism penetration depth at all stations, with minimum dredged material layer
thickness ranging from 6.4 cm to 14.6 cm (overall average of 11.9 cm). Apparent new
dredged material was observed over the northern and central areas of the original NL-91
deposit (Figure 3-29). The thickness of new material was measured in the REMOTS®
photographs, where fresh material over older deposits was clearly evident (Figure 3-30).
The DAMOS Capping model was used to calculate the footprint of the 1997-98
sediment deposit on the NLDS seafloor and forecast where new material would
accumulate. Based on reported barge volumes and disposal positions, the model predicted
the footprint would consist of two overlapping deposits (represented as circles on Figure 3-
30) with diameters of 400 m (5,650 m3 reported volume) and 300 m (1,200 m3 reported
volume). The circles encompass the majority of the REMOTS® sediment-profile
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
&
B. D/S CTR
A. D/S 100N
15 cm
Figure 3-29. Evidence of recently disposed capping dredged material (CDM) over the NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
xo[duiog punoy| S/d pure [6-IN 24} JaA0 suoT}eIs @S LOWAY 22 [eHoyeu
MoU JO YJdap “SA JOO]JVAS oY} UO [eLIa}eUI peSposp Mou Jo jULIdjoo} pojoofoid pue suoredo] [esodsip WO 3 ‘O¢-€ 2ANSIT
Ww! 00Z wg
(japow Buiddes SOW) jWUd}oo) pq Pe}Delo4g C)
suoje007 fesodsiq 86-2661 []
(wo) Jevere/\| MON JO Udeq #/ UOREIS @SLOWSY w
€8 GVN
sJo}ewW ul Ujdeq
NM .0S¢°V0 oc N..00S'V0 ocd MN .0S2Z'°V0 .cZ
N.001 91 obV
N.002°91 ob?
N.00€'91 ob?
Kaning sujewAujeg 266) Pu
jelazey) MON P2}99}0q YIM SUOI}E}S @SLOINAY 8661
suojje007] jesodsiq 86-2661
Z6-L66L PuNo|] Uo}HuIUO}G Mog
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
photography stations that display accumulation of new material. Thin layers of material
were observed at two stations falling outside the predicted area of accumulation (Stations
300N and 100S). The presence of this material at these stations suggests a thin layer on
the margins of the new deposit spread 25 m to 50 m beyond the radius predicted by the
model.
The replicate-averaged mean camera penetration at the NL-91 and D/S mound
complex ranged from 6.5 to 15.8 cm, with an overall average of 12.4 cm (Table 3-4). As
in previous surveys, fine to very fine sand characterized the surface sediments over the
mound. The major modal grain size was 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand) in most photographs.
Surface sand overlying fine-grained sediment (sand-over-mud stratigraphy) was noted over
the majority of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex. Sand, pebbles and hydrozoans were
noted once again at Station 200S, consistent with the findings of prior surveys
(Figure 3-31).
The replicate-averaged boundary roughness values ranged from 1.0 to 3.2 cm, with
an average of 1.5 cm (Table 3-4). Boundary roughness was attributed to a combination of
physical and biogenic forces. Evidence of physical disturbance and possible winnowing of
the surface included abundant disturbed amphipod tube mats, surface scour, and shell lag
deposits.
The apparent redox potential discontinuity (RPD) was measured on each photograph
to determine the depth of penetration of oxygen into the sediment (Figure 3-32; Table 3-4).
The replicate-averaged apparent RPD depths over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex
ranged from 1.2 to 6.1 cm (3.6 average). No stations over the mound displayed any visible
redox rebound layers.
The successional status was advanced, showing healthy Stage II or Stage II on III
communities inhabiting the sediments of the disposal mound. Some stations showed a
slight decline in successional stage relative to data collected in 1997. The reference area
showed a similar decline in comparisons between the 1997 and 1998 dataset (Table 3-12).
Stage III organisms were present in 15 of the 39 replicates distributed among eight stations
(Figure 3-33). The remainder of the July 1998 photographs were classified as Stage I, or
Stage I to II if amphipod (Ampelisca) tube mats were present.
Median OSI values ranged from +3.0 to +11.0, with an overall average of +7.5
for the NL-91 and D/S mound complex (Figure 3-32; Table 3-4). The only median OSI
values of < +6.0 (indicating continued disturbance) occurred at Stations 300E and 400E.
The low OSI values were due in part to shallow RPDs, disturbed amphipod tube mats and
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
66
bb
se
LL
OL
8661 661
ssouyBnoy
Aiepunog | Ue!P2W ISO
‘(uBis< ay) Aq payedipul) ssauxo}Uj JeAe} jeayeLW pabpasp jo ayewNSe WNWIUJW e S| UMOUS aNjeA UeaW au} uau)
‘sajyeoldas om)
1se9] Je ul Udap UoVesjauad Wsyd ey) papeeoxe jee}eW pabpeup J) ‘uoNe\s yee ye pazAleue pue pauleygo sebew! eyeo)\des E=u Jo) suUeaW ave UMOYS SeNIEA ,,
WoL tis
INO I 1S
Ls
WwmeNO Wis
ris
WeNO I 4s
NO I 4s
WNO I 4s
WmNO Ws
WNO I Ls
Wis
Wis
NO Ws
8661
(1ud)
NO WLS
INO Ls
TNO W Ls
Ws
TNO 11s
NO | 1s
NO I 1S
NO Il LS
Ls
NO Wels
TNO WLS
ror wis
TNO TLS
L661
apo; sofeyy yuasald aBbe}s ysayBiy
azig ues
by'o<
LS°vb<
68 LL<
Wl i LBEL<
Wi i 9S'6
Wit i St VL<
Wn 6E'LL<
HS'EL<
8E'8<
by'9<
LL6<
CEELS
6S'LL<
LS"bL<
PEEL <
mn‘ LO'PL<
8661 2661 866l 661 8661
jepayew
(wis) paBpaig/m
ueaw Gd sday
jo Jaquiny
yuasald
seBejs
Jeuojsseoons
SAIAING B66] PUL L66[ 94} 10} ArvUIUINS
cBOb<
Se'Sh<
9G°Lb<
LL PL<
egSi<
b6'9<
c8'9<
SpSl<
92'Lb<
26'0b<
BL bL<
cB bL<
€2'8L<
2661
+y(W9)
ueew SssauyoiyL
jeayeyy peBpaig
bs'9
ease
42
(wi)
uray uo}}e1JaUad
eiawieg
synsay Aydvssojpoy a[Jo1g-jUEUIPIS @SLOWAA X2{dwuoD punoy] ¢/q pur [6-IN
b-€ Fe
S/O 8 L6-1N
S/O 8 L6-1N
S/O 8 +6-1N
S/O 8 +6-1N
S/G 8 L6-1N
S/O 8 16-1N
S/O 8 L6-1N
S/G 8 L6-1N
S/d 8 16-1N
S/d 8 L6-1N
S/O8 /6-1N
S/G 8 16-1N
S/O 8 16-1N
aly
‘yay /punow
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
ae Bathymetric Survey Area
Yor
ef :
ae ‘
AE Al
Toe
35
8
}
87
material
Om 200m 400m
Figure 3-31. REMOTS® photograph of Station 200S depicting a layer of pebble and shell over reworked dredged
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
88
uoseas [esodsip 96-66] 24) SuLINp poysodap [eLoyeu Mou JO
yuLidjooy payorpesd ay} pue yuridjooy punow jesodsip 766] St} 0} SANeTOI ‘xepdwoo punow g/q pue 16-IN
Y} J9A0 ADAINS Q6GI OU} OJ poyepnoyeo sonyea (anjq) [SO UeIpow pue (pes) Cady UREU jo dew uonnqgmsiq *7E-¢ aANnsIy
W 002 wid
(jepow Buidde5 SOW) JUUd}oo _wq pepelolg C)
suoij2007 jesodsiq 96-266 []
UOHEIS @SLONSY w
€8 GVN
sJajaw ul ujdaq
N .0S¢'0 oc NM .00S°70 ocd N.0SZ0 o¢Z
N.OOL'9L ob?
N.00€ OL ob?
2
IBA
SDPIOAY,
vi
/
Aaning sujewAipeg 266) pue
Jel49}e|] MON P2}99}0q 4}IM SUOI}E}S @SLOWAY 866L
suoe07 jesodsiq 86-2661
Z6-L66) Puno Uo}HuIU}G /Moq
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
89
uoseas esodsip 36-2661 OU} SuLINp poysodap
jeLayeu Mau JO JWLId\oo} parorpaid oy} pue yuLIdj00j punow jesodsip 766] SY} 0} sAteyar “xepdwo0o
pUNOUI S/C PUL [6-IN 9Y} JOAo AdAINS B66] OU} JOF paye[Noyeo o8ejs [euOIssad9Ns Jo dew UOIINGIISIG “EE-E BANSIY
W002 wo
€8 GVN
siajau Ul ujdeq
japow Budde SONG) JULc}OO} ING pePelold O}
suojeoo] jesodsiq 96-2661 [] |
UONEIS @SLOWSY ww |
| (
NM ..00S'70 oc M.0SZ°0 cL
Y.
(Corey Kyjeq) turidjooy y
Sunow rete Z6618 (
xa|dwod punou. aN
2
N.002'9} obv
N.OO€'9L obv
Kaning sujewAujeg 266) pue
[ELISE] MON P2}99}9q UPIM SUOREIS @SJOWSY S66)
suoje907] jesodsiq 86-2661
Z6- L661 Puno] Uo}Huluojg/moq
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
90
lack of clear evidence of recent Stage III activity. There were no indications of low DO
conditions within the surface sediments, and no methane detected.
3.1.3 August 1992 Dissolved Oxygen Measurements
Near-bottom (approximately 1 m above the bottom) dissolved oxygen concentrations
sampled on 7 August 1992 at the disposal site and the three reference areas ranged from
7.3 mg/L to 7.8 mg/L. Dissolved oxygen concentrations in the top two meters of the
water column were slightly higher than those measured in near-bottom waters, ranging
from 7.7 mg/L to 8.1 mg/L. The concentrations of dissolved oxygen were uniformly
distributed throughout the disposal site and reference areas. These concentrations are not
limiting to benthic organisms (Tyson and Pearson 1991).
3.2 USCGA Disposal Mound
3.2.1 Bathymetry
The USCGA dredged material disposal mound was formed when 124,000 m? of
dredged material from the Eagle Pier project at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy was
released at NLDS between the historic NL-TR and NL-RELIC disposal mounds. A
1600 m x 1600 m precision bathymetric survey was conducted in August 1995 to
document changes in seafloor topography relative to the survey performed in August 1992
(Figures 3-34 and 3-35).
A 0.86 km? area surrounding the USCGA buoy was selected as an area of detailed
analysis to facilitate accurate depth difference calculations. The material dredged from the
US Coast Guard Academy was sequentially deposited, forming an irregularly shaped
sediment mound 420 m wide and 1 m high at the apex (Figure 3-36). There was a 0.5 m
high ridge of sediment that extended approximately 320 m southwest from the center of the
mound. Another lobe of sediment extended 350 m from the mound center to the north-
northeast and was 190 m wide.
3.2.2 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
A 13-station REMOTS® sediment-profile photography survey was completed over
the USCGA mound in August 1995 to document the benthic recolonization status. A
complete set of REMOTS® image analysis results for the August 1995 survey of the
USCGA mound is presented in Appendix B.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
9]
August 1995 Bathymetry
1600 m X 1600 m Survey Area
41° 16.500° N
41° 16.250° N
41° 16.000° N7
72° 05.000° W 72°04.750°W 72°04.500°W 72° 04.250°W 72°04.000° W
NLDS
Corrected to MLLW
Depth in Meters
NAD 27
SS |
Om 400 m
Figure 3-34. Bathymetric chart of the 1600 m < 1600 m survey area, August 1995 results,
0.5 m contour interval
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
Depth Difference
August 1992 vs. August 1995
41° 16.500°N
41° 16.250°N
41° 16.000°N
72° 05.000 W 72°04.750W 72°04.500W #£72°04.250°W 72° 04.000°W
NLDS
Depth in meters
Mound Height in meters
NAD 27
EE Zz
Om 400 m
Figure 3-35. Depth difference plot displaying the location of the disposal mounds created
since the August 1992 survey (USCGA, NL-94, and NL-92) relative to historic
disposal mounds
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
93
Depth Difference
41° 16.600° N:
41° 16.500° N
41° 16.400"
41° 16.300"
41° 16.200" N
72° 04.400° W 72° 04.200° W 72° 04.000° W
NLDS
USCGA Mound
Mound Height in Meters
NAD 27
SS
Om 400 m
Figure 3-36. USCGA mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995, 0.2 m
contour interval
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
At ten out of thirteen REMOTS® stations, the dredged material thickness exceeded
the camera prism penetration depth in all of the replicate photographs (Table 3-5). Along
the southeast stations, dredged material thickness either exceeded prism penetration depth
or reached a maximum of 13.24 cm (100SE) and 9.23 cm (SOSE). At Station 150E,
dredged material thickness was less than penetration depth and averaged 12.8 cm.
The mean prism penetration depths ranged from 12.2 cm to 15.9 cm and averaged
14.0 cm. These values are consistent with the presence of fine-grained material at most of
the stations. Most REMOTS® photographs taken at the USCGA mound showed
homogeneous silt-clay (>4 phi). Very fine sand (4 to 3 phi) was noted in two replicates at
100S, and at one replicate each at LOOW, 50N, 50S, and CTR. Sand-over-mud layering was
noted at all stations.
The boundary roughness values for the USCGA mound sediment-profile photographs
were low (ranging from 0.6 to 1.6 cm with an average of 1.0 cm), indicating relatively little
surface disturbance. Boundary roughness was due to biogenic activity in all but one
photograph. In one of the replicate photographs at Station 100E, the boundary roughness
was due to the presence of shell lag at the sediment surface.
Station-averaged apparent RPD depths ranged from 0.8 cm to 7.6 cm at the
USCGA mound (Figure 3-37; Table 3-5). The average RPD value for the mound was
2.69 cm, with no geographic pattern to the distribution of values. The RPD values for two
out of three replicate photographs taken at the center station (CTR) were unmeasurable due
to camera artifacts. These two photographs were noted as being potentially hypoxic, along
with one replicate image at Station 50S and one replicate at Station 100S.
A Stage II biological assemblage dominated the USCGA mound. The presence of
Stage III organisms (primarily Stage II on III) was noted in three of the replicate images at
Station 5OW, two replicates at Stations SOE and 100E, and one replicate at Stations 100SE
and 100W (Figure 3-38). Many of the photographs showed dense aggregations of
amphipod tubes, or disturbed and decaying tube mats. Due to the presence of Stage II or
Stage II on III communities, the USCGA mound at the time of the August 1995 survey
appeared to be recovering more rapidly than predicted for recently deposited dredged
material (Germano et al. 1994).
Median OSI values at USCGA mound REMOTS® stations ranged from +3 to +9,
with an overall average of +6.4 (Table 3-5). The lowest OSI was at the CTR station
(+3), primarily due to low dissolved oxygen conditions and lack of Stage III organisms,
although only one CTR photograph had a measurable OSI due to camera artifacts on the
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
95
‘(uBis< ay} Aq payeopu!) sseuxo!Uy) JeAe] jeeyeWW peHpaip jo ayewNsa WnwwiuIW e Ss} UMOYS aNnjeA UeaW aU} UBL} ‘Seyeo!|daJ OM) }se9] Je Ul UJdep
uonjesjaued wsiid ayy papeedxe jelieyew pebpaup J] ‘uole}s yes ye pazAjeue pue paulejqo sabeu!! ayeo1|\das E=u JO} Sueatu ole UMOUS SaN|e/ ,,
(wid)
uvayA
ssauysnoy
Alepunog
uvIpayAl
Iso
Wis
il NO W Ls
is
Wis
i LS
i NO Wt Ls
Wis
Wis
NO Wis
Il! NO I LS
i Ls
is
i NO I LS
quasaig
ade)}g SOYsIT
[ersazey, | (wd) uvayy (wis)
pia | aspor ssouyol uva
sadvjS Coola PML W u0neI07
HOEeaaIS [Blaze] jUOHVQIUIgG
BIQUILD
ADAING S66 94) A0J ArvUIUING s}[nNsoy AYdvasoj}oY a1J0.14g-}UIUIIPIg ®SLOWAY VIOSA
S-€ 91qRL
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
96
USCGA Mound
1995 RPD and OSI Values
41° 16.600"
41° 16.500’ N SONA 5
5 -88 3 2.48 0. 821.9
ONLY SL Wey
sos
39 6 DRS
1008,
41° 16.400’ | 1.57
15084
Acoustically Detectable
41° 16.300° | Margins of the Mound
2.69
Overall Average A
41° 16.200° 6.42
72° 04.400° W 72° 04.200° W 72° 04.000° W
RPD
Station A
OSI
Figure 3-37. Distribution map of mean RPD and median OSI values calculated for the 1995
survey over the USCGA Mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
97
USCGA Mound
1995 Successional Stage
41° 16.600° N
41° 16.500° N
8% ON
ak as
WH, tH, ltt a li, he al
it de
Mee
100S&_ sii, Ill
41° 16.400° N ll
° : Acoustically Detectable
41° 16.300° N
Margins of the Mound
41° 16.200° N
72° 04.400° W 72° 04.200° W 72° 04.000° W
Station A
Successional Stage
Figure 3-38. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1995 survey over the
USCGA Mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
98
other replicates. Two other USCGA stations (150S and 50S) also had evidence of low
apparent dissolved oxygen and the absence of Stage III organisms, resulting in lower OSI
values. A median value of +5 was derived for Station 150S and +6 was calculated for
Station 50S. Sediment methane was noted at one replicate image at Station 50W; however,
the presence of Stage III organisms buffered the effect on the OSI for that station.
3.3. NL-94 Disposal Mound
3.3.1 Bathymetry
The NL-94 mound was formed when 37,000 m3 of material from the U.S. Navy
Submarine Base was released at the NDA 94 buoy. The disposal activity was concentrated
around the NDA-94-1 buoy position. As a result, the August 1995 precision bathymetric
survey was successful in detecting this small deposit (Figure 3-35). A 0.48 km? area of
detailed analysis was selected around the active disposal point to conduct precision depth
difference calculations.
The deposition of material at the NDA-94-1 buoy resulted in the formation of a
disposal mound approximately 125 m wide and 0.9 m high (Figure 3-39). A flat tongue of
dredged material with a maximum height of 0.4 m extended 140 m southeast from the apex
of the mound. This southeast tongue of the NL-94 mound abutted the historic NL-I mound
(Figure 3-35).
3.3.2 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
A series of REMOTS® sediment-profile photographs were collected over the NL-94
mound in August 1995 and September 1997 to document the lateral extent of dredged
material within close proximity to the NDA-94-1 disposal buoy position, as well as assess
the benthic recolonization status of the surficial sediments. A complete set of REMOTS®
image analysis results for the NL-94 mound are presented in Appendix B.
Siei45| August 1995 Survey
The center station (CTR) and six surrounding stations (all within 50 m of the center)
had dredged material, with the thickness of the dredged material layer at each station
exceeding the penetration depth of the camera prism. Twelve of the fifteen REMOTS®
stations had recently placed dredged material present, while three of the stations had either
ambient sediment or historic dredged material. At Stations ISONW, 100SW, and 150SE,
one or two of the replicate photographs displayed dredged material layer thickness greater
than or equal to the penetration depth of the camera prism. At Stations 15ONW and
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
Depth Difference
41° 16.400° N
41° 16.300" N
41° 16.200° N
41° 16.100° N
72° 05.000° W 72°04.900°W 72°04.800°W 72°04.700° W 72°04.600° W
NLDS
NL-94 Mound
Mound Height in Meters
NAD 27
|
Om 200 m
Figure 3-39. NL-94 mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995, 0.2m
contour interval
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
100
100SW, the remaining replicates indicated ambient sediment, while historic dredged
material from the NL-I mound was detected at 150SE (Figure 3-40A&B). This resulted in
mean dredged material thickness of 2.9 to 5.5 cm for these stations. At 100E, all
replicates had dredged material over ambient sediment, for an average thickness of 5.3 cm.
Ambient sediment was found in all replicates at stations 100 m west, northwest, and
northeast of the center.
The mean camera penetration depths for REMOTS® stations at the NL-94 mound
ranged from 7.9 cm to 15.6 cm and averaged 11.85 cm. These values are consistent with
the presence of fine-grained material at most of the stations (Figure 3-41).
The major modal grain size was consistently classified as fine-grained silt-clay (>4
phi) at the stations within 50 m of the center station and at Station 100SE. The remaining
station replicates ranged from silt-clay (>4 phi) to very fine sand (3 to 4 phi; Table 3-6).
Sand-over-mud layering was observed at the majority of the stations outside a 50 m radius
from the center.
Average boundary roughness values ranged from 0.6 cm to2.9cm. The
distribution of boundary roughness values showed no spatial pattern. With the exception
of three stations, boundary roughness over the NL-94 mound was attributed to biogenic
activity. One replicate from Station 100E exhibited evidence of a scour lag feature, one
replicate from Station 50NE showed a possible erosional boundary, and one replicate at
50NW displayed a shell lag feature.
Average RPD values at NL-94 stations ranged from 0.7 cm to 5.1 cm, with an
average RPD value of 2.02 cm over the entire mound (Table 3-6). There was no apparent
geographic pattern to the distribution of deep and shallow RPD depths (Figure 3-42). The
shallowest RPD was measured at 50S (0.7 cm), and the deepest RPD was measured at
5OSE (5.2 cm).
Stage II and Stage II on III communities dominated the NL-94 mound. Stations
100NE and 5ONW had Stage I present, as well as Stages II and III (Figure 3-43). Because
these are advanced successional stages for an area recently impacted by dredged material,
NL-94 appeared to have recovered rapidly relative to the normal progression of benthic
recovery (Germano et al. 1994).
Median OSI values ranged from +6 to +11 over the NL-94 mound, with an overall
average of +7.4 (Table 3-6). In general, an OSI of less than +6 indicates areas of benthic
disturbance (Rhoads and Germano 1982). The highest OSI value of +11.0 was detected at
Station 5OSE, where there was Stage II on III and a mean RPD thickness of 5.1 cm
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
101
‘(uBIs< ay} Aq payeoipul) ssouyxoIu) JaAe| jelayeLU pabpaip jo a}ewWNse WNWIUIW e S| UMOYS aNj|eA UeaW ay} UB) ‘sa}ed!|daJ OM) }Sea] Je UI Uap
uoljesjQuad Wslid oy) papaaoxe jeli9yewW pabpeup 3]
‘uole}s yoea ye pazAjeue pue paulejqo safe! aye0!|\de1 E=u JO} SUeaW aJe UMOUS San|e/ ,,
Ii NO I LS
i NO Wt 1s
NO Wt Ls
Wt NO Il LS
NO Wt Ls
NO I Ls
I NO tl 4s
INO I 1s
INO Il 1s
il! NO ll Ls
NO 41s
i NO Wt 1s
i NO I 4s
it NO 1s
NO Il Ls
(wd)
uvayAl
ssauysnoy
Aaepunog
(14d)
UBIpay spor quasaig
ISO Jofe | adeyg ysaysiy
aZIg UleAD
Jeltazeyy |(wd) uvayy] (wid)
padpaiq | ssauyaiyy uvayAl cOneanry BIIV JOY
/M Sday | [elsazey] | uoesjauag /punoy
BIIUIED
quasaid
sadejS
[euolssazong
ABAING S66T 24} 10J ArvUUING synsay Aydvasojoyd atjo1g-JUaUIpIg @®S LOW ALY 6-IN
9-€ AGB L
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 ~ 1998
AJOATOOdSaL ‘[eLoJeul Pospoip ILIO}STY poyJOMoL pue
JUSIUIpes JusIquie SunoIdep (q) ASOST pue (V) AANOST YORE p6-IN Woy poureigo sosewl @SLOWAA “Ov-€ ens
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
Mean Dredged Material Thickness
41° 16.400° N
41° 16.300° N
41° 16.200 N
41° 16.100° N
72° 05.000’ W 72° 04.900°W 72° 04.800° W 72° 04.700°W 72° 04.600° W
—
ncm- Mean Dredged Material Thickness NLDS
: NL-94 Mound
CP -DM Thickness > REMOTS® : .
: Mound Height in Meters
Camera Penetration NAD 27
|
Om 200 m
Figure 3-41. Mean dredged material thickness at the 1995 REMOTS® sediment-profile
photography stations over the NL-94 mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
104
NL-94 Mound
1995 RPD and OSI Values
41° 16.400° N
41° 16.300’ N 1 ae
150NW 7 2.48
100NW Ay
2.1
41° 16.200° N
Acoustically Detectable
Margins of the Mound
2.02
Overall Average A
41° 16.100° N 7.43
72° 05.000° W 72° 04.800° W 72° 04.600° W
RPD
Station &
OSI
Figure 3-42. Distribution map of mean RPD and median OSI values calculated for the 1995
survey over the NL-94 Mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
105
NL-94 Mound
1995 Successional Stage
41° 16.400° N
41° 16.300° N
41° 16.200° N
Acoustically Detectable
Margins of the Mound
41° 16.100° N
72° 05.000° W 72° 04.800° W 72° 04.600° W
Station &
Successional Stage
Figure 3-43. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1995 survey over the
NL-94 Mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
106
(Figure 3-42). One replicate at 5SONE showed evidence of low apparent DO, but no
methane was evident in any replicate.
BS September 1997 Survey
In September 1996, the NDA-96 buoy was deployed approximately 80 m west of the
NL-94 mound. A total volume of 3,400 m3 of supplemental cap material was placed over
the mound at the buoy, adding to the pre-existing mound (Figures 1-3 and 3-44). In
September 1997, 15 stations at the NL-94 mound were sampled with the REMOTS®
sediment-profile camera, duplicating the survey conducted in 1995. Three or more replicate
images were obtained at each station to document the placement of the new material and
monitor benthic recovery.
Dredged material was detected in all replicates at all stations. The measured
thickness of dredged material ranged from 6.0 to 16.2 cm (> 13.5 cm average; Table 3-10).
Dredged material layer thickness was equal to, or exceeded, the camera penetration in all
replicates images collected in September 1997. In 1995, dredged material was not detected
at stations LOONE, 1OONW, and 100W. Thin layers of dredged material over ambient
sediments were noted at Stations 100SE, 100SW, and 1ISONW. The presence of dredged
material greater than camera penetration at these stations during the 1997 survey was
consistent with the placement of material at the NDA 96 buoy (Figure 3-44).
The REMOTS® images characterized the sediment as a mix of fine to very fine sand
(3 to 4 phi) with some variability (Table 3-7). As a result, the major modal grain size for
the entire mound was 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand) at most stations. Stations 1OONW, 100W,
50NW, and 50SE displayed a finer grain size, with a mix of silt-clay predominating (>4
phi). Coarser-grained sediment consisting of fine to medium sand (2 phi) occurred in at
least one replicate at Stations CTR, 5OSW, and 100E. Surface sand overlying fine-grained
sediment (sand-over-mud stratigraphy) was noted in 28 of the 46 photographs collected.
The boundary roughness values for the NL-94 mound ranged from 0.6 to 4.2 cm,
with an average of 1.4 cm (Table 3-7). Shell lag or disturbed amphipod tube mats were
visible on the sediment surface within most replicate images. One replicate image at each
of Stations 1OONE, 5ONE, and 100SW was identified as winnowed. Armoring of the
sediment surface by shell lag (current scouring), visible in the images at Stations 150SE,
50NW, 50S, and 100E, may protect the mound from further current-induced winnowing
(Figure 3-45). In contrast to the 1995 survey results, boundary roughness was primarily
attributed to physical forces, although some surface disturbances were indeterminate or
caused by biogenic activity.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
107
‘(uBis< ayy Aq payeoipul) Sseuxo1U} JeAe] JelWe}eW peBpaup jo eyewNjse WuNWIUIW e S| UMOYS eNjeA UBB BU} UAL} ‘Se}ed!I|de OMY
ysea] Je ul UJdap UONesjoUed sid ey) papedoxe jeayewW pabpaip J] ‘uOoIe}S YOes ye pazAjeue pue pauleyqgo sebew! ayeo1jdaJ E=u JO} SUBALU Be UMOYS SAN|eA ,,
il NO 1 4S
Y OL I Ls
i NO lt LS
iT NO | 4s
i OL W Ls
Ls
NO Il LS
i OL W Ls
IT NOT 1s
Ls
I OL We Ls
rNO ll LS
I NO | Ls
1s
is
ueay (wid) ueal
abeys safes ee ssouyoiy | UO}JeJQUad ae
ysoybiy =| jeuolssaoons y jeyayey eiaweg
jo Jaquiny
pebpeaig
(wo) ueayy juasald yuasald
ueIpaW
ssauyinoy iso
Auepunog
AVAING £66] 24} 1OF ATLUIUINS s}[Nsoy AYdesSOJOY_ I1O1g-}UIWIPIS @SLOWAY Puno [esodsiq 76-IN
L-€ A081
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
108
uosvas [esodsip / 6-966] OU} SULINp [eLIO}eUI pospoIp YSOJJ POATode1 PRY YOIYM S66] UI SJUOWIpes jUSIquIe
ButXeydsip punoul p6-"IN 2U} JOAO suoye}s SUIMOYS (AANOO[) OSeUT o[duexe pue dew sayoidiojuy “pp-¢ aansiy
jyusiquiy J9AO IG Yse4
BusAejdsip uoHeIS@SLOWAY fae ar
Vv ——
SSOUYIIUL ING Pebesaae-ajeo1|\day
jeLojeyw Pobpeyae
Ww msoor
JUSIGQWY J9AO jellajeyy pobpaiq ysei4j jo s.udsald
Kaning Aydesboyoud djlJO1g-JUSWIPSS @SLOWSAY L661
Puno 76-1N
8yIS jesodsiq UOpuc] MeN
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
S
S
ing
150SE (A), SONW (B), and 50S (C) depicting shell armori
10n
d from NL-94 Stat
ine
3-45. REMOTS® images obta
Figure
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
110
The replicate-averaged apparent RPD ranged from 1.8 to 6.2 cm (4.3 cm average),
with no apparent spatial pattern (Figure 3-46; Table 3-7). Six stations had a visible redox
rebound ranging from 4 to 9 cm, suggesting a recent reduction in RPD depth.
Similar to the 1995 data, the successional status was advanced, showing healthy
Stage II or Stage II on III communities inhabiting the sediments of the NL-94 mound
(Figure 3-47). Some of the photographs were identified as Stage I to II due to the presence
of disturbed amphipod (Ampelisca) tube mats. Stage III organisms were present in half of
the replicate images and 11 of the 15 stations.
The median OSI ranged from +7 to +11, with an overall average of +8.3 (Figure
3-46; Table 3-7). A replicate-averaged OSI of < +6 suggested a disturbed benthic habitat
at Station SOSE. A number of replicates had indeterminant OSI values due to camera
faceplate wiper smearing or artifacts on the sediment profile. The overall average OSI in
1997 was slightly higher than that observed during the survey conducted in 1995 (+7.4),
indicating a slight improvement in benthic conditions.
3.4 Northern Region
3.4.1 1997 Master Bathymetric Survey
The 2100 X 2100 m precision bathymetric survey performed over the NLDS
provided a new DGPS baseline to aid in the development of a Geographic Information
System (GIS) database for the disposal site, as well as to facilitate comparisons with future
project-specific surveys. This survey yielded a bathymetric chart of the 4.41 km? area
with a minimum depth of 13.5 m over the NL-RELIC mound and a maximum depth of
24.75 m approximately 100 m south of the disposal site boundary (Figure 3-48). A total
of 11 dredged material disposal mounds were apparent within the confines of the disposal
site, although many of them overlapped to form one larger feature. A vertically
exaggerated, three-dimensional view of the NLDS displays the various dredged material
deposits in contrast to the natural topography, indicating the presence of a central “bowl”
surrounded by dredged material mounds (Figure 3-49).
The overall topography of the NLDS slopes from a depth of less than 14 m in the
Northern Region towards the south and southwest. A northwest-southeast oriented trough
divides the area elevated by active dredged material disposal throughout the center of the
site and the elevated area in the southwest corner (Figures 3-48 and 3-49). This ridge is in
close proximity to the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) special purposes buoy “NL.” The data
collected as part of the July 1986 master bathymetry survey covered an area of the seafloor
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
I1l
NL-94 Mound
1997 RPD and OSI Values
4.43,
450NW a 6.15
400NW ae
1oow AZ
Q NA 41 4.
DA 96 @ 4) NA
Acoustically Detectable
Margins of the Mound
4.28
Overall Average A
8.3
RPD
Station A
OSI
Figure 3-46. Distribution map of mean RPD and median OSI values calculated for the 1997
survey over the NL-94 Mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
NL-94 Mound
1997 Successional Stage
Acoustically Detectable
Margins of the Mound
Station A
Successional Stage
NLDS
EE OZ.
Om 200 m
Figure 3-47. Distribution map of successional stage calculated for the 1997 survey over
the NL-94 Mound
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
113
September 1997 Master Bathymetric Survey
41° 16.750° N
41° 16.500’ N-£
41° 16.250°N4
41° 16.000° N
41° 15.750° N
72° 05.000° W 72° 04.500° W 72° 04.000° W
NLDS
Depth in meters
NAD 83
Figure 3-48. Bathymetric chart of New London Disposal Site (contour interval = 0.25 m)
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
September 1997 Bathymetry
NLDS
Depth in meters
NAD 83
Figure 3-49. Three-dimensional view of the bathymetry of NLDS (vertical exaggeration |
37.25)
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
115
approximately 1200 m to the southwest of the current disposal site boundaries
(Figure 3-50).
Depth difference comparisons between the 1986 and 1997 surveys (corrected to
MLLW and NAD 83) show sizable accumulations of dredged material corresponding to the
formation of several mounds, including the Seawolf (1995) NL-TR/USCGA (1989-90),
and NL-88 (1988) mounds. There were no corresponding changes in depth between 1986
and 1997 near the “NL” buoy (Figure 3-50). As a result, this ridge represents a natural
geologic feature on the seafloor of eastern Long Island Sound. Survey artifacts were
identified in the northern area of the disposal site along the east-west slope visible in
Figure 3-50. The small patches of apparent accumulation in the southern portion of the
disposal site also may be a result of “noise” from various bottom features.
3.4.2 NLDS Northern Region
The Northern Region of NLDS (Figure 2-7) was surveyed in September 1997 using
precision bathymetry and REMOTS® photography to provide an adequate baseline for valid
depth difference calculations and assessment of benthic conditions in future surveys.
3.4.2.1 Bathymetry
Depths in the Northern Region ranged from approximately 14 m near the northern
end of the NL-RELIC mound to >23 m in the southwest corner (Figure 3-51). The
deepest area of the Northern Region was consistent with the overall topography of the
area.
3.4.2.2 REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography
The September 1997 REMOTS survey of the Northern Region consisted of sampling
at eleven stations (Figure 2-7). Historic dredged material was detected at seven of the eleven
stations distributed within the region. Dredged material was commonly characterized by a
chaotic sediment fabric, gray clay, or disturbed surficial layers, and in most cases was easily
distinguished from the brown, sandy ambient material. Dredged material was not detected
in any replicate image obtained from Stations N1, N3, N5, and N10 (Table 3-8). However,
some historical material placed over 20 years ago at the NL-Relic mound, near Station NS,
may now appear similar to ambient material. Station N9, located at the northern edge of the
Seawolf Mound may have been influenced by dredged material disposed during the 1995-96
disposal season.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
116
‘(uBIs< ay} Aq peyeolpul) ssouyo1U} 4eAe] jelWa}ewW peHpoup jo ayewNse wWnwiuIW e SI UMOUS BNjeA UAW ay} UdU} ‘Se}eo!|des Om) Sea] Je UI UJdep
uoljesj;oued wusiid ay} pepesoxe jeua}ew pebpaip J ‘uoNe}s yoke ye pazAjeue pue pouleyqo sebew! oye01|de1 E=u 10} SUeSW O1e UMOUS SONIE/ ,,
EOP i 1s ll JEOUO}SIY |
ZOE I Ls lI 0
p< 1s Ta Wa slomeas ¢ 6N
€%p7 TI NO Il LS jeo110})S14 | : @N
€%p Ill NO Il 1S Wa someas | ZN
‘JEOUO}SIY |
ajqeyen I OL MLSs Ta JEdUO}SIY Z : ON
€%p% {Il NO Il 1s Ta 0 GN
€%p {Ill NO Il 1s TM Jeouoysiy | i vN
€or {il OL Wis TT 0 €N
€ OP INO Il Ls Tia JEOU0}SIY | : ZN
€%p7 {Ill NO ll 1S 0 LN
uolBay YON
xx(W9)
jenajyen
ues (wid) ues
pebpaig/m
abejs sabes sdoy SSOUHIIY] | UOlNeIOUdd
yseyubiy =| jeuoissa20ns Ronaatinn jeueyeyy BawieD
pebpag
(wo) ueay juasald yuasald
uelpe
ssauyhnoy iso
Asepunog
ADAING £66] 9) 10 AtvUIUING synsoy Aydv.ss0}OY IO1g-JUIWIPIS @SLOWAY WOIsdYy UW.1IYI.10N SG'IN
8-¢ F142 L
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 — 1998
117
Depth Difference
September 1997 versus July 1986 Master Bathymetric Survey
41° 16.750’ N-jae
Depth Difference
Due To Survey
Artifacts
41° 16.500’ N+
41° 16.250° N
41° 16.000’ N
41° 15.750°N
72° 05.250° W 72° 04.750° W 72° 04.250° W
NLDS
Difference in meters
NAD 83
—k =
Om 400m
Figure 3-50. Depth difference between the 1986 and 1997 master bathymetric surveys
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
118
UOISIY UISYWON 94) Jo AouAYIeG 166] Joquiaidss ‘*[S-¢ aNnsIy
€8 QVN
SJa}elW Ul U}deq
ae SSS ee
Asepunog ais jesodsig juewng
AnawiAujeg 266) 4equie}deg
uoiBey WieyON SIN
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
119
Fine to very fine sand characterized the sediment at most stations in the Northern
Region, as the major modal grain size was 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand) in most photographs
(Table 3-8). At Station N9 fine sediments, either gray clay or brown clayey silt (>4 phi),
were predominant. In contrast, one replicate at Station N6 contained gravel with overlying
shells. Station 10 had two photographs with a coarser grain size of fine sand (3 to 2 phi).
Surface sand overlying fine-grained sediment (sand over mud stratigraphy) was noted in
one-fourth of the photographs from the region.
Despite the occasional appearance of an overlying sand layer, all of the stations in
the Northern Region had relatively low boundary roughness values, with a replicate-
averaged mean of 0.9 cm. The coarse grain size in replicates at Station N6 and N10, in
addition to the predominance of shell lag and disturbed tube mats on the sediment surface,
indicated potential bottom current scouring. Although some stations were indeterminant or
had biogenic activity, boundary roughness was primarily due to physical forces.
The replicate-averaged apparent RPD ranged from 0 to 6.2 cm (3.0 average; Figure
3-52; Table 3-8). At Station N9, two replicates had an indeterminate RPD and one
replicate had no RPD visible due to the presence of gray clay. Seven replicate images
collected throughout the region had a visible redox rebound ranging from 4 cm to 7 cm
depth, suggesting a recent reduction in RPD depth.
The biological assemblage at the Northern Region stations showed a dominance of
Stage II organisms (amphipods) with some Stage III organisms present (Table 3-8). The
Stage II organisms settle and create dense tube mats on the sediment surface, filtering
particles from currents they create at the top of the tubes. This high density of tubes and
filtering activity may serve to exclude Stage I organisms. Only a few replicates were
suspected of having retro-Stage II conditions. Stage III organisms, indicated by sub-
surface feeding voids, were present in 13 replicates of the Northern Region stations
(Figure 3-53).
Median OSI values ranged from +1 to +11 over the Northern Region, with an
overall average of +7.4 (Table 3-8). The majority of the stations had OSI values > +6.
The lowest OSI was detected at Station N9, where gray clay was present from the nearby
Seawolf disposal mound. The highest possible OSI value, +11, was calculated for four
replicate images and assigned to Station N8. Neither low dissolved oxygen conditions nor
methane were observed in any of the photographs collected in September 1997.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
SC'IN JO UOIal WIDYLION oY} JOAO sonjea [SQ pue Gdy Jo uoNqisIq
ISO
VW suoners @S LOWY UolBey WeYyyoN
addy
Aiepunog ays jesodsig snolAdd
M .000°%0 ozZ M .00S°0 o2Z M .000'S0 .2Z
ee
(ie
A
Gwen TS)
coy J
Fee
Asepunog 97z1§ jesodsig yuauing
AnewAujyeg 266) 4equie}des
uoIBay WISYLION SIN - SUOE}S @S}JOWY 2661
“7S-€ BANS
N .00v'9L obY
——F-N .009°91 ob?
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
121
SCIN JO UOIsoY UJOYLION oY) JOAO sade|quasse o3ejs [LUOTSS9dNNS JO UOTINGINSIG: “ES-¢ AINSI
abejys jeuoissa99ns
WY suones @S LOWY UolBey WeyON
Aiepunog ays jesodsig snoineid
M .000°¥0 ZZ
M .00S°90 .2Z M _.000°SO .c2
- ; N .00b'91 oLb
ih
Thal ol oe = SS
AMIRI. i sy IE
FC So = row GA &
N .009°91 obb
We ee iy a eee ll i. el Seon
yn we ven 7 Cit Vv.
ea ees ae ee
Asepunog ajis jesodsig jueung
N .008’9b ob?
AyyswiAyjeg 266| Jequieydes
uolGey WaYON SCN - SUONe}S @sS}oWaY 2661
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
i
bo
bBo
3.5 NL-92 Disposal Mound
The NL-92 mound is a small dredged material disposal mound formed by the
disposal of approximately 18,000 m3 of dredged material at the NDA 92-2 buoy. This
small deposit was detected in the August 1995 bathymetric survey (Figure 3-35). A
0.56 km? area surrounding the NDA 92-2 buoy position was selected as the area of detailed
analysis. The NL-92 mound was found to be 140 m wide, with a maximum height of 0.6
m (Figure 3-54). A REMOTS® sediment-profile photography survey was not conducted
over the NL-92 mound, because this location was planned to be used for dredged material
disposal relatively soon after the bathymetric survey.
3.6 | NLDS Reference Areas
Three reference areas for NLDS (NLON REF, NE REF and WEST REF) were
surveyed with the REMOTS® sediment-profile camera in August 1992, August 1995,
September 1997 and July 1998. These reference areas provide a basis for comparison with
the images collected over the NLDS project mounds and aid in determining the health of
the benthic community within the disposal site. The condition at NLON REF, NE REF,
and WEST REF is presumed to reflect seasonal and annual variations in environmental
conditions. Three replicate photographs were collected at each reference area station and
subjected to the identical series of measurements and criteria used to characterize benthic
habitat within the disposal site. A complete set of REMOTS® image analysis results for
each reference area and each survey are presented in Appendix B.
3.6.1 August 1992 Survey
A 13-station cross-shaped grid was established over each of the three NLDS
reference areas in August 1992 (Figure 2-8). The results obtained from the reference areas
were used in comparison to the data collected over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex.
Dredged material was not apparent at any of the reference stations. Sediment
layering (sand-over-mud stratigraphy) was noted in multiple replicate photographs at NE
REF and NLON REF. The surfaces at these stations were characterized by shell fragments
and fine sands overlying silt and clay, with the formation of some bedforms (ripples).
The stations over NE REF and NLON REF displayed very similar sediment grain
size distributions, relative to the disposal site, with a major mode of 3 to 4 phi (very fine
sand; Table 3-9). The WEST REF was also characterized as predominantly sand, but
sediment grain size major modes varied between 2 to 3 phi (medium to fine sand),
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
123
Table 3-9
NLDS Reference Area REMOTS® Sediment-Profile Photography Results Summary for the 1992 Survey
Camera in Si Boundary
Number | Penetration Z j Roughness
Mean (cm) i Mean (cm)
Mound/ Ref
Area
NLON REF
NLON REF t i : Stage II
NLON REF t t f Stage II
NLON REF \ t : Stage II
NLON REF b ! : Stage Il ON Stage III
NLON REF i i A Stage II
NLON REF ! Y 2 Stage II
NLON REF : ! d Stage II
NLON REF : \ : Stage II
NLON REF : f é Stage |
NLON REF ; t : Stage II ON Stage III
NLON REF i t ; Stage II
NLON REF : I f Stage II
7.05 0.00 i Stage Il
9.48 0.00 HUN Stage Il ON Stage III
9.61 0.00 ll Stage II
7.59 0.00 1M! Stage I ON Stage III
6.97 0.00 LILI | Stage Il ON Stage III
8.46 0.00 " Stage II
10.61 0.00 11H Stage II ON Stage III
8.24 0.00 11,1 Stage Il ON Stage III
8.69 0.00 HU Stage Il ON Stage I!
8.69 0.00 i TT
7.33 0.00 i TAT
7.58 0.00 i TAT Stage Il ON Stage III
8.00 0.00 i Stage II
Stage | ON Stage III
Stage |
Stage Ill
INDET
Stage | ON Stage III
Stage | ON Stage III
Stage | ON Stage I!!
6.41 0.00
10.61 0.00
0.00 0.00
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
Depth Difference
41° 16.600° N
41° 16.500° N
72° 05.000° W 72° 04.9800°W 72°04.800°W 72° 04.700° W
NLDS
NL-92 Mound
Mound Height in Meters
NAD 27
EE EZ
Om 200 m
Figure 3-54. NL-92 mound, depth difference from August 1992 to August 1995, 0.2 m
contour interval
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
125
3 to 4 phi (very fine sand) and >4 (silt). Shell fragments and shell lag deposits were also
a major characteristic of the surface sediments at WEST REF.
Each of the three reference areas showed relatively low intra- and inter-station mean
boundary roughness values, ranging from 0.0 cm to 2.2 cm across all three areas
(Table 3-9). Boundary roughness determinations were classified as biogenic for the
majority of the photographs collected in August 1992.
The replicate averaged RPD depths within the three areas ranged from 0.0 cm to
2.3 cm, the overall average RPD was 1.44 cm (Table 3-9). The WEST REF exhibited
slightly deeper RPD layers than those at NE REF and NLON REF. No redox rebound
layers were observed in any of the replicate images collected at the three reference areas.
The NE and NLON reference areas exhibited Stage II populations (amphipod tube
mats) with several stations progressing to Stage III, while the reference area WEST REF
showed signs of recent benthic disturbance. Five of the 13 stations sampled at WEST REF
had exclusively Stage I populations (Table 3-9). Four stations had Stage I organisms
colonizing the sediment surface over Stage III deposit feeders at depth. The eastern-most
station displayed evidence of a healthy Stage III population. Stations 300 m north, 100 m
east, and 200 m east had indeterminate successional stages due to low camera penetration.
The median OSI values at the reference areas in 1992 ranged from +2 to +8, with
an overall average of +5.4. The majority of stations had index values of +5 and +7
(Table 3-9). There were five indeterminate stations at the disposal site and three at the
WEST REEF area, due to indeterminate RPD values or successional stages. Neither low
DO conditions nor sediment methane were noted at any of the 39 reference stations in
August 1992.
3.6.2 August 1995 Survey
The surficial sediments at the NLDS reference areas (NLON REF, NE REF, and
WEST REF) were examined with REMOTS® sediment-profile photography as part of the
August 1995 survey. These reference areas served as a baseline for determining the health
of the benthic community at the NL-94 and USCGA mounds, as well as the NL-91 and D/S
mound complex. In contrast to 1992, a total of 15 stations were surveyed in August 1995
(four at NLON REF, five at NE REF, and six at WEST REF). These stations were
randomly distributed within a 300-m radius of the center of each reference area
(Figure 2-8).
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
126
No dredged material was present in any replicate photograph obtained from the
three reference areas. Camera penetration depth ranged from 3.0 cm to 9.6 cm, and was
shallowest at WEST REF (Table 3-10). Despite the relatively low penetration, sand-over-
mud layering was observed in all replicate photographs from NE REF and in two replicate
photographs from NLON REF Station 2. No evidence of mud was seen at WEST REF.
All of the reference areas were predominantly characterized as fine to very fine
sand (Table 3-10). At NE REF and NLON REF, the major modal grain size was 4 to 3
phi (very fine sand) in all but one photograph from NE REF. NE REF Station 4 had a
major modal grain size of >4 phi (silt/clay). At WEST REF, the sediment was mostly 3
to 2 phi (fine sand). WEST REF Station 5 was dominated by 2 to 1 phi (medium sand).
All of the reference area REMOTS® photographs showed low boundary roughness.
Averaged boundary roughness values for the stations ranged from 0.4 cm to 1.6 cm and
were attributed to biogenic activity.
The apparent RPD depth ranged from 0.7 cm to 2.9 cm at the reference stations.
The average RPD value was 1.76 cm at WEST REF, 1.04 cm at NE REF, and 1.51 cm at
NLON REEF (Table 3-10). Two REMOTS® photographs at WEST REF (Station 2/B and
Station 6/B) showed no RPD and indications of low apparent DO conditions within the
bottom waters. No redox rebound layers were detected in any of the 1995 reference area
photographs.
In general, the reference areas displayed a solid Stage II benthic community with
progression into Stage II on III at all but two stations (NE REF Station 2 and NLON REF
Station 4; Table 3-10). Dense amphipod tube mats were present at all three reference
areas. The replicate image obtained from WEST REF Station 6/B was classified as azoic,
while the remaining two photographs (obtained within a 25 meter radius) displayed healthy
Stage II and Stage III benthic communities. This suggests a very recent and highly
localized benthic disturbance.
Median OSI values ranged from +4 to +8 at the reference stations during the 1995
survey, with an overall average of +5.9. This shows a slight improvement in overall
benthic conditions, relative to the August 1992 survey despite one replicate photograph at
NLON REF (Station 2/B) and two replicates at WEST REF (Station 2/B and Station 6/B)
showing evidence of low DO conditions or enrichment. No methane gas was apparent in
any replicate image.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
127
(wid)
uvayAl
ssouysnoy
Aiepunog
(1yd)
mtPoW | uvaq ISO
apow
ISO Jofe
aZIg UBD
il! NO I LS
13QGNI
il NO I 1S
is
ii NO i LS
iy NO ll 1S
INO Il 1s
it NO Wt Ls
it NO We Ls
i LS
i NO We Ls
I LS
NO tl LS
it NO I 1S
Il NO lis
juasai dg
advjs saysIH
00°0 00°0
00°0 00°0
00'0 00'0
Wl
LACNI
NIL
iH
WNT
Wl
Wl
HN
Well
yuasaid
3
fins paspaiqg
/M sday
[Buolssasans
(uid)
uvayl
Uu01j}BI0T
day LSAM
day LSAM
dau LSSM
day LSAM
day LSAM
day LSAM
43uy AN
dau AN
day AN
day AN
day AN
day NON
day NOTIN
43u NOIN
43u NOIN
vay
Jeu /Punoy
AVAANG S66 24) A0J ArBUIUINS s}[nNsay Ayde.ss0j0Y I101g-JUSUIIPIS @SLOWAA &21V 9909.19J9y SC'IN
OT-€ F421.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
128
3.6.3 September 1997 Survey
A total of 13 randomly selected stations were surveyed with the REMOTS®
sediment-profile camera at NUON REF, NE REF and WEST REF reference areas as part
of the September 1997 field effort. Four stations were surveyed in NLON REF, four at
WEST REF, and five in the NE REF. These data were used as the basis for comparison in
assessing benthic habitat quality over the NL-94 mound and the NL-91 and D/S mound
complex.
No dredged material was present in any of the replicate photographs obtained from
the three reference areas. Replicate averaged camera penetration depth ranged from
4.6 cm to 10.3 (Table 3-10). The shallow to moderate camera penetration documented
limited sand-over-mud layering at several stations within each reference area. All of the
reference areas showed some evidence of physical reworking or erosion of sediment as
shown by the following characteristics: poor sediment sorting, shell layers near the surface
(shell lag), hydroids, or ripped up amphipod tube mats. WEST REF showed the most
widespread evidence of physical reworking, with shell lag at 4 out of 6 stations.
All of the reference areas were similar in sediment grain size distributions with a
predominant major mode of 3 to 4 phi (very fine sand). Station 10 in the WEST REF was
an exception to this and exhibited a predominant grain size major mode of 2 to 3 phi
(medium to fine sand; Table 3-10).
Each of the three reference areas showed relatively low intra- and inter-station mean
boundary roughness thickness values, ranging from 0.39 cm to 1.39 cm (Table 3-10). The
overall average boundary roughness was 0.73 cm, with the majority of replicates
displaying physical disturbances.
The replicate averaged RPD ranged from 1.75 cm to 3.48 cm, with an overall mean
of 2.35 cm within the three areas (Table 3-10). Redox rebound layers approximately 5 cm
deep were identified in two replicates obtained from NE REF.
The NE REF and WEST REF reference areas exhibited primarily Stage II
populations, with several stations having Stage III present (Table 3-10). The reference
area NLON REF showed primarily Stage II organisms progressing to Stage III (three of
four stations) and one station in which Stage I organisms were present at the sediment
surface over Stage III deposit feeders. The images from NLON REF and NE REF showed
dense amphipod tube mats (Stage II). The mats at NE REF were in the process of being
eroded during the survey, while those at NLON REF were largely intact.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
129
Median OSI values for the reference area REMOTS® stations ranged from +5 to
+10, with an overall average of +6.8 (Table 3-10). Once again, the reference areas in 1997
showed a small improvement in benthic habitat conditions relative to previous years (1995
and 1992). No low DO conditions or methane gas was detected in any replicate image.
3.6.4 July 1998 Survey
As part of the July 1998 survey over NLDS, 13 randomly selected stations were
surveyed with the REMOTS® sediment-profile camera at NUON REF, NE REF and
WEST REF reference areas. Four stations were surveyed in NLON REF, four at WEST
REF, and five in the NE REF. These data were used as the basis for comparison in
assessing benthic habitat quality over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex.
Camera penetration ranged from 5.6 cm to 11.7 cm, with an average of 7.8 cm,
which was comparable with 1997 results (Table 3-11). No evidence of dredged material
was apparent in any of the photographs. Sand or sandy silt over mud stratigraphy was
observed in many of the photographs. Sediments at NE REF and NLON REF were
moderately sorted, whereas WEST REF sediments were primarily poorly sorted. Organic
detrius, surface scour, and/or shell fragments were present at the surface in many of the
replicates.
Fine to very fine sands (3 to 4 phi) characterized most of the sediment at the
reference areas (Table 3-11). Two stations within NE REF were composed primarily of
fine-grained sediments (>4 phi) while WEST REF displayed several stations with a
significant fine sand component (2 to 3 phi).
Boundary roughness values were generally low (<1 cm), except at WEST REF
Station W13 (STA 08), which had a replicate average value of 1.7 cm. Disturbances
within the surface sediments at the reference areas were primarily attributed to physical
forces. However, evidence of biological activity causing the surface disturbance was
present in approximately 33% of the reference area photographs.
The RPD depths ranged from 1.55 cm to 3.98 cm, with an overall average of 2.55
cm (Table 3-11). In general, the RPD depths at both NLON REF and WEST REF tended
to be deeper relative to NE REF. Redox rebound layers were apparent roughly 4 cm
below the sediment-water interface at two stations within NE REF (Stations 10 and 12).
Tube mats were common at the reference areas; some of these mats appeared to be
disturbed at NE REF and WEST REF. Stage II was considered the dominant successional
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
130
stage. Stage I was found at multiple stations in all three reference areas, but only seven
replicates had active feeding voids at depth to indicate the presence of Stage III individuals.
The OSI median values ranged from +5 to +10, with an overall average of +6.7.
These were very similar to values observed in 1997 (+6.8). No replicates had low
dissolved oxygen conditions, although a few replicates from NE REF did portray dark,
sulfidic sediments. No methane gas pockets were detected in the images obtained from the
reference areas in July 1998.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
131
(wid) uBayAl
ssauysnoy juvipayA ISO
Arepunog
azig WIeAD
It LS
Ls
i! NO Il LS
i 1S
iy NO Wt LS
is
i 1s
1s
i NO Wt LS
INO I Ls
iy OL W LS
iT NO W Ls
i NO | LS
yuasatg
a3¥}S JSOySI
}UISa1g Sade}S (wd)
[Buolssaoong | ues ddl
xx (WD)
ued] (Wd) UBT
ssauyIyy | uoneaaueg
[eL193e]A] BAILED
pespaig
[eltajeyA]
podpaiqd/a
sday
jo Jaquiny]
day 1SAM
day 1SSM
day 1SAM
day LSAM
day SN
day AN
dau AN
43uY AN
day AN
43uY NOIN
45Y NOIN
dau NOIN
day NOIN
Bay
PU /punoy]
AVAING £66] 24) 10 A1VWUIUINS syNsay AydeisoO}OYg I1JO1g-JUSWIPIS @SLOWAY &21V 9009.10J9 SGN
IT-€ e148 L
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
BZ GGL U! Paysi| suOHedo] pue SAWEU YIM UONE|{IUOD JOy (xx ¥1S) SUOEUBIsep UONEIS BE6h «
iis i is
WN Wis
WoLris ti NO Wis
Wis
INO Wits
WNO TLS
Wis
NO WLS
NOI Ls
NO IT LS
Was
sss o'r
99°LL 8201
tes 4
(pO WLS) » IN
(€0 VLS) € IN
(20 VLS) 2 1N
0 (10 VLS) IN
866) 266} 866) 2661 8661 2661
(1yd) apory
sofeyy a71g ujeay yUasatd a8e)S JSaysIHL
ssauysnoy Asepunog uelpayy ISO
quasi Jepsayepy pasdpasqyar | (wd) ueazy ssauyo|yy (wo) ueayy
$a8e)g [EUO|ssazINg (ws) weal ddd sday jo saquinny [epsayeyy paspaiq =| uopesjauag ersmED [easy euasajay | Jou /Punoyy
SAOAANG B66] PUL L66] OJ AtvUIUINS sj[nsey AYdvAZOOYg IO1g-}UIWIPIS @S LOWAY LAV 9909.19J2Y SC'IN
132
CI-€ PIGeL 4
ng Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
1torl
Mon
4.0 DISCUSSION
The New London Disposal Site (NLDS) was monitored over five time intervals
during the period 1991-1998 and received dredged material from twelve distinct episodes
of disposal (Figure 1-3). The patterns of disposal and monitoring provide an overview of
the processes affecting the environment within the disposal site. This report includes
specific details regarding individual disposal mounds, their history and monitoring results.
This report is the first of two-volume report that covers D/S, NL-91, USCGA, NL-94, and
the Northern Region. Volume 2 of this report covers the results of monitoring the U. S.
Navy Seawolf mound in 1997 and 1998. Before discussing each mound complex and the
baseline study of the northern region, it is helpful to review the evidence of physical and
biological response to disposal activity at this site.
The master bathymetric survey conducted in 1997 over the revised DAMOS NLDS
site boundaries provided data for an analysis of the topographic signature of the disposal
site over a ten year period since the prior master survey in 1986 (Section 4.1). The
REMOTS® sediment profile photography results from the disposal sites are compared in a
general way with the results from the three surrounding reference areas (NLON-REF, NE-
REF, and WEST-REF) in Section 4.2. The history and monitoring results of each disposal
mound (D/S & NL-91, USCGA, NL-94) are then discussed (Sections 4.3, 4.4, 4.5).
Finally, a discussion of the baseline characterization results for the Northern Region is
provided in Section 4.6.
4.1 Topography and Evidence of Historical Disposal at the NLDS
The 1997 master bathymetric survey showed several key features important for the
future management of the NLDS. First, the spatial distribution and topography of the
dredged material mounds coincided well with the known buoy locations and mound growth
over time as recorded in previous surveys (NUSC 1979, SAI 1980, Parker and Revelas
1989, SAIC 1990a, b, c; 1995a, b; Germano et al. 1995). Coherent disposal mounds can
be seen associated with the historical placement of dredged material at the following
locations: NL-I (1978), NL-II (1979-80), NL-III (1980-81), Seawolf, NL-85, NL-88,
Dow/Stonington & NL-91, USCGA/NL-TR, NL-95, and NL-94/96 (Figure 1-2). Most
significantly, the NL-RELIC Mound has been a prominent and unchanging feature at the
site since DAMOS bathymetric surveys began in 1977 (NUSC 1979, SAI 1980). The
presence of discrete disposal mounds with consistent heights and shapes provides evidence
that dredged material placed on the seafloor at the NLDS has been stable for at least twenty
years. The importance of these results should be emphasized. Despite clear evidence of
surface washing of fine-grained material across the disposal site and a potential for active
bedload transport (Knebel et al. 1999, Waddell et al. 1999), the consolidated mass of
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
134
disposal mounds measured as volume in bathymetric depth-difference calculations has been
stable over a period of at least twenty years.
A three-dimensional view of the master bathymetric survey showed lower
topographic relief south of the NL-RELIC Mound, in a depression surrounded by historical
dredged material disposal mounds (Figure 3-49). The practice of using the periodic
disposal of dredged material to develop topographic barriers was first discussed in relation
to NLDS (SAI 1980). This practice was a successful management method during the
formation of the NHAV-93 mound at the Central Long Island Sound Disposal Site (Morris
1996). In that study, a topographic depression was used to site the disposal of a major
dredging project (New Haven); the disposal of the dredged material in this “bowl” served
to restrict its lateral spread. The depression located south of the NL-RELIC mound
represents a potential area for similar future management of material at NLDS. However,
the location of this bowl directly beneath the U.S. Navy Submarine corridor may place
limits on the effective use of this area for dredged material disposal. Buoys located in this
corridor are a hazard to submarine navigation and mound height would need to be limited,
in order to ensure water depths greater than 14 m. Other topographic low areas are near
the margins of the disposal site and include the trough in the southwestern quadrant of the
site, which is associated with the natural ridge southwest of the site.
4.2 Biological Response to Disposal at the NLDS
The REMOTS® sediment profile data collected from reference areas and within the —
disposal site provide an opportunity to compare and contrast the biological response to
disposal activity over a six year period (1992-1998). Throughout this period the fresh and
recent (1-6 years old) dredged material showed a rapid recovery from a disturbed surface
to a healthy benthic assemblage. Areas of historical dredged material (over 6 years old)
were not specifically targeted for investigation, but were sampled around the margins of
new disposal mounds. These areas all supported a healthy mature benthic community.
Reference areas appeared to be recovering in 1992 from some patches of disturbance in
1991 but also recovered rapidly and returned to a more uniform mature benthic community
in 1995. All reference areas experienced some limited patches of disturbance (presence of
recolonizing Stage I organisms, eroded tube mats, shallow RPDs) at various times within
the survey period. None of the individual reference stations exhibited consistent
disturbance, that is, the patches were in different places each year. Overall, the reference
areas supported a healthy benthic assemblage and displayed typical features of seasonal
settlement and disturbance (see below).
Assessment of the health of the benthic community at NLDS requires the ability to
separate site-specific characteristics from regional environmental characteristics. During
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
135
this time, historical dredged material and reference areas experienced very limited direct
physical disturbance, whereas areas that received fresh dredged material experienced a
short period of physical disturbance followed by recovery. In some areas, dredged
material was placed two or three times during the six years. All of the monitoring surveys
were conducted in late summer (July 30-September 6), a period with elevated water
temperatures and the potential for ecological stress or seasonal senescence of settling
organisms (see below).
The most consistent biological characteristic observed over the monitoring period
was the widespread presence of tube building amphipods in surface sediments. These
organisms collect fine-grained sediments to construct their tubes, and the presence of the
tubes enhances trapping and deposition of fine sediments (Mills 1967). The mats can
become very dense and restrict bioturbation and circulation in sediments below the tubes
(the result is a relatively thin redox potential discontinuity or RPD). In both disposal areas
and reference areas, a mixed layer of fine sand and coarse shells was present beneath the
tubes, but this layer is often difficult to see. Clumps of mussels also were seen and widely
reported from the area within and around the disposal site. In areas with shells or pebbles
on the surface, hydroids and mussels were seen attached to the hard substrate.
When the amphipod tubes are physically disturbed or abandoned (due to natural
seasonal decline, senescence or environmental stress), they are easily eroded, and the sand
or shell surface is again exposed to bottom currents. As a result, summer periods (when
the tube mats are present and widespread in and around the NLDS) may represent active
deposition of fine sediment, with subsequent die-off or thinning of the tubes and sediment
reworking in the winter.
The surface sediment characteristics are a combination of the material deposited and
processes of physical and biological reworking. The DAMOS monitoring results reported
here serve to demonstrate that the surface sediment characteristics throughout the disposal
site and reference areas became similar over time (with the exception of areas mantled with
coarse sand or pebbles). The NLDS is subject to relatively strong tidal currents but is also
sheltered from wave disturbance (Waddell et al. 1999). When tidal currents are sufficient
to transport fine sand as bedload, some fine materials may be winnowed leaving a lag
deposit of sands and shells too large for transport. Semi-diurnal tidal currents at the NLDS
appear to be strong enough to rework unconsolidated surface sediments through this
process until surface sediments have a lag deposit of sand or shells. However fine surface
sediments are also bound by biological activity and may be remarkably resistant to erosion
while the organisms are alive. Tidal currents are likely to be slightly weaker in the
depression where the NL-91 and D/S mound complex is located compared to the tops of
nearby, shallower mounds.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
136
The result of the surface sediment winnowing process includes six characteristics in
REMOTS® images: shell lag, winnowed surfaces, disturbed amphipod tube mats, physical
boundary roughness, and sand-over-mud stratigraphy. There are three potential causes for
surface disturbance of tube mats: 1) predator foraging; 2) microbial decomposition
following the abandonment of the tubes; and 3) disturbance from either trawling or a
temporary increase in near-bottom turbulence or current velocity. When tubes are
abandoned they are much more susceptible to physical transport by currents.
Surface sediment reworking at NLDS appears to be limited to winnowing of fines
accumulated during the summer in areas where shell lag armors the surface. The shell lag
may form in the fall and winter during periodic storms, then again be covered with tube
mats that bind finer sediments in the spring and summer. This seasonal response is
observed to be consistent between reference areas and disposal areas, and results in a
fluctuation between seafloor surfaces covered with muddy tubes to surfaces with clean shell
and fine sand. This seasonal cycle may open opportunities for settlement of recolonizing
benthic organisms and explain their patchy distribution at reference areas. Any deposition
of fresh dredged material will begin to be exposed to this cycle and will eventually acquire
tubes or attached organisms depending on grain size. In general, there is evidence of fall-
winter winnowing in many areas of NLDS and spring-summer deposition of finer
materials. As shown by the long-term stability of mounds at the site (see above), this cycle
does not appear to result in any significant net loss or gain of sediment.
4.2.1 Evidence of Low Dissolved Oxygen
In some years (1995, 1997), NLDS appears to have experienced a seasonal or
annual environmental stress or disturbance that has affected apparent reduction-oxidation
conditions within the sediments across some of the disposal mounds and nearby reference
areas. In other years (1992, 1998) there is no evidence of such disturbance. Dissolved
oxygen concentrations measured in August 1992 approximately 1 m above the bottom at
the disposal site and reference stations ranged from 7.3 mg-I' to 7.8 mg-!', while surface
water oxygen concentrations ranged from 7.7 mg:I' to 8.1 mg-I'. These results are
comparable to results for August 5, 1992 (7.05 mg-I') from the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection Hypoxia Monitoring Program (CT DEP) measured at Station M3
(Kaputa and Olsen 2000). Station M3 is located at the west end of Fisher's Island, 2 nmi
SE of NLDS in greater than 35-m water depth (water depths at NLDS range from 14 m to
24 m).
The monitoring surveys conducted in early August 1992, late August 1995, early
September 1997 and late July 1998 all revealed the presence of widespread tube-building
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
137
ampeliscid amphipods at the surface sediments. At the time of the surveys, many of the
tubes were empty and the mats were susceptible to disturbance. In the surveys conducted
later in the summer (1995 and 1997) the sediments underneath the mats contained evidence
of restricted circulation in the bottom waters or organic enrichment of the sediments
(shallow RPD thicknesses, methane bubbles, senescent tube mats, e.g. at USCGA and NL-
91). The presence of these indicators at the reference areas suggests that a regional
environmental stress or disturbance may have affected the eastern LIS region in 1995 and
1997.
It is generally assumed that eastern LIS does not experience hypoxic conditions
(defined by the EPA’s Long Island Sound Study as 3.0 mg-I" or less). CT DEP data for
this region show a seasonal decrease in DO values from May to December with a low
period from late July to August or September (Kaputa and Olsen 2000). Stations further
away from NLDS (K2, J2, and N3) also follow the same pattern of lower DO values in the
surface and bottom waters from May to December. Dissolved oxygen levels normally
decrease to 6 or 7 mg-!" for all of these stations. The lowest values recorded since 1991
for these stations approached 5.9 mg-I" in the summer of 1991. Based on the CT DEP time
series data there is no evidence that 1995 or 1997 experienced conditions markedly
different from 1992 or 1998. However the surveys in 1995 and 1997 were conducted later
in the summer when environmental stress may have been sustained for a longer period.
While these measured values do not seem sufficient for true hypoxia, they may
contribute to the conditions observed. The most likely explanation for the presence of
patches of reduced sediments and methane is that seasonal senescence of dense mats of
tube building amphipods may create temporary reducing conditions near the sediment
surface. Once these mats are eroded, the reduced sediments will be exposed to overlying
waters and rapidly oxidized through bioturbation and diffusion. Sediment profile surveys
conducted during this period (late August - early September) might contain all three of
these conditions (senescent tube mats and reduced sediments, reduced surface sediments,
thin RPD at surface). DAMOS surveys in western and central Long Island Sound have
noted that survey data during late summer may be complicated by the sediment disturbance
induced by hypoxic conditions and have recommended that surveys should be conducted in
early summer or early fall after recovery (Morris 1998, Murray and Saffert 1999). While
the eastern Long Island Sound may not experience hypoxia, it seems clear that seasonal
biological processes may affect survey results. Future surveys at NLDS could optimally be
scheduled after recolonization has begun (early June) but before mid-August when tube
mats appear to senesce.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
138
4.3 Capping of the Dow/Stonington Disposal Mound
The NL-91 and D/S mound complex reflects a complicated history. The products
of seven disposal sequences are reflected in the results of four separate monitoring surveys.
These results show that a low mound complex was formed in 1991-1992 from mixed
deposits rather than a distinct capped mound. This mound complex had a thin layer of
sand covering the central region that was subsequently covered with additional cap material
in 1997-1998 (Figure 3-30). While the intended capping process was not completed as
originally planned in 1992, the presence of the sand layer and addition of subsequent cap
material in 1997-1998 has provided sufficient interim isolation of the material intended for
capping. Throughout the survey period this mound complex supported a healthy benthic
community that progressed rapidly from early colonizers to a more mature state. There
was no evidence of adverse environmental impact from the sediments and the surface of
the mound responded physically and biologically the same as other mounds and the
reference areas. Further, additional sediment was sent to this location from 1998-2000,
and the results of follow-up surveys will be presented in a future report.
Dredged material disposal activities at NLDS were confined to the period between
mid-October 1991 through mid-January 1992. Within those 90 days, the NDA buoy was
moored at four different locations, the D/S buoy was removed from the site during capping
operations and never recovered, and the U.S. Navy established a 300-m wide corridor for
submarines transiting through NLDS. In the midst of an unusually active buoy
management cycle, an apparent error in navigation information during disposal resulted in
much of the CDM being placed somewhat to the east of the buoy, leading to the formation
of the irregularly-shaped NL-91 and D/S mound complex (Figure 3-9).
The depth difference map generated using survey data collected before and after
CDM disposal indicated that the bulk of the CDM was placed east of the NDA and D/S
buoys (Figure 3-8). REMOTS® sediment-profile photographs were further assessed to
determine if thickness of material <20 cm could be mapped to further delineate the
distribution of dredged material (see Section 4.3.2 and Figure 3-11).
4.3.1 Benthic Recolonization
The area surrounding the NL-91 and D/S mound complex consistently showed
evidence of rapid benthic recolonization (Stage I progressing to Stage II with Stage III)
similar to results expected from sediments with a low potential for adverse biological
effects (Figure 3-24). In 1992, after the initial placement of material, the mounds
supported active benthic colonization and were more advanced than predicted. Median
OSI values ranging from +2.0 to +8.0 (average +4.9) were comparable to those of the
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
139
reference areas (Figure 3-27 and Tables 3-1 and 3-9). The recolonization status of the area
around the NL-91 and D/S mound complex was characterized as supporting a solid Stage
II population with some progression into Stage III assemblages. Apparent RPD values of
the NL-91 and D/S mound complex tended to be slightly lower, but comparable to those of
the two eastern reference areas (NE-REF and NLON-REF).
In 1995, three years after the NL-91 and D/S mound complex was placed, the
benthic communities at the most recent disposal mounds were even more advanced than in
1992 and comparable to the reference area benthic community (which had improved). All
stations contained Stage II on III successional stages and RPDs had deepened (Table 3-2).
OSI values had improved from an average of +4.9 to +8.0. In 1997, the NL-91 and D/S
mound complex continued to support a healthy benthic community. The dominant
successional stages were Stage II or Stage II on III (Table 3-3). The median OSI values
ranged from +2.0 to +11, with an overall average of +8.6, slightly higher than measured
in 1995. After placement of additional cap material in 1998, the NL-91 and D/S mound
complex again supported a healthy benthic community. The dominant successional stages
were Stage II or Stage II on III communities (Table 3-4).
Recolonization of the new dredged material was rapid and many of the replicate
photographs from these regions showed Stage III feeding voids. The station median OSI
values ranged from +3.0 to +11.0, with an overall average of +7.5, which was only
slightly lower than prior to the placement of new material (1997).
4.3.2 Sediment Distribution and Characterization
The evidence from sediment profile photography of the distribution of dredged
material released during the 1991-1992 disposal season is consistent with the placement of
a mixed deposit of Dow UDM and Stonington UDM and Port Niantic material near the
D/S buoy, and east of the D/S buoy a deposit of Dow CDM (compare Figures 3-8 and 3-
11). REMOTS® photographs collected in 1992 were able to provide a clear delineation of
the distribution of fresh dredged material, but it was difficult to clearly separate the source
of fresh materials. The UDM and CDM from Dow facilities were quite similar in
sediment texture (black silt). However the REMOTS® photographs revealed the presence
of a layer of sand over much of the surface of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex.
This distinctive sand layer (1.27 cm to 7.03 cm thick) was mixed with dredged
shells and small pebbles. The layer is similar in texture to the Port Niantic material
targeted for the NDA buoy on 11 and 12 December 1991 at the end of the disposal period
(Figure 3-12). REMOTS® photographs collected in the vicinity of the bulk of the CDM
deposit detected a thin layer of biologically re-worked dredged material over fresh dredged
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
140
material (Figure 3-10) whereas surrounding the new mounds, the surface sediments were
reworked older dredged material (lighter in color).
The surface of these deposits converged over time with the development of a
reworked shelly sand surface seasonally occupied with amphipod tubes. The lateral edges
of the original deposit were clear in 1992, but became less clear as subsequent deposition
and reworking caused the surface sediments to converge in appearance. This similarity in
appearance indicates a continual effect of biological and physical reworking as amphipods
trap mud and tidal currents transport fine sand and shell fragments. In 1997 the pattern of
distribution was quite uniform with fine to very fine sand over the entire survey area
including the NL-91 and D/S mound complex, and similar to the reference areas.
After deposition of new material in 1997-1998, a fresh layer was found over the
center of the Dow/Stonington UDM (Figure 3-29). The 1997-1998 disposal logs indicated
that 6,850 m? of sediments were placed over the northern area of the D/S mound as
supplemental cap (Figure 3-30). This material was seen as distinctive layers of fresh
dredged material in stations over the older D/S Mound sediments and to the north (Figure
3-33). In some stations to the east, the new material was not sufficiently distinct to
measure thickness but was darker and showed fewer signs of biological reworking.
One location beyond the southern margin of the NL-91 and D/S mound complex
(1992 Station 400 S) had a distinctive layer of pebbles, shells and sand on the surface
(Figure 3-15). This station is located on the top of a slope at the very edge of older
dredged material accumulation. It is likely to represent a lag deposit formed from older
dredged material. It also provides a useful reference mark because this coarse material
was detected in each subsequent survey (400S 1992 became Stations 200S in 1995, 1997,
1998; Figures 3-21,3-26,3-31). The consistency of results from this station located just
beyond the margin of the disposal mound complex over a period of six years combined
with no net topographic change is clear evidence of the physical stability (armoring) of this
area.
The NL-91 and D/S mound complex is located in a depression surrounded by
disposal mounds which provide protection from tidal currents and waves. This mound
complex has remained physically stable from 1992 through 1998. During this time the
mound and surrounding areas have supported a stable, healthy benthic community. Any
significant physical erosion (more than about a centimeter) or impact from biologically
unsuitable sediments would have been evident in the REMOTS® sediment profile
photographs collected during this period.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
117
Depth Difference
September 1997 versus July 1986 Master Bathymetric Survey
41° 16.750° N
Depth Difference
Due To Survey Ste
Artifacts
41° 16.500° N7—
41° 16.250° N
41° 16.000° N
41° 15.750° N
72° 05.250° W 72° 04.750° W 72° 04.250° W
NLDS
Difference in meters
NAD 83
Om 400 m
Figure 3-50. Depth difference between the 1986 and 1997 master bathymetric surveys
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 — 1998
118
UOISY UOYVION oy} Jo AnowAyyeQ 166] Joquiaideg “[g-¢ BANS
wo
€8 QVN
sJa}aw ul ujdeq
Asepunog ej jesodsiq snoiaeld
NM .000'¥ .¢Z NM .00S'P .cZ NM .000'S .¢Z
N 00991 olP
POs
00:9 ee °
(Se; ae ae ee ee ee ee ee
Asepunog ajis jesodsig wua1ing
AuyouiAyjyeg 266) Jequie}des
uolbey WieYyON SIN
N 00891 bv
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
119
Fine to very fine sand characterized the sediment at most stations in the Northern
Region, as the major modal grain size was 4 to 3 phi (very fine sand) in most photographs
(Table 3-8). At Station N9 fine sediments, either gray clay or brown clayey silt (>4 phi),
were predominant. In contrast, one replicate at Station N6 contained gravel with overlying
shells. Station 10 had two photographs with a coarser grain size of fine sand (3 to 2 phi).
Surface sand overlying fine-grained sediment (sand over mud stratigraphy) was noted in
one-fourth of the photographs from the region.
Despite the occasional appearance of an overlying sand layer, all of the stations in
the Northern Region had relatively low boundary roughness values, with a replicate-
averaged mean of 0.9 cm. The coarse grain size in replicates at Station N6 and N10, in
addition to the predominance of shell lag and disturbed tube mats on the sediment surface,
indicated potential bottom current scouring. Although some stations were indeterminant or
had biogenic activity, boundary roughness was primarily due to physical forces.
The replicate-averaged apparent RPD ranged from 0 to 6.2 cm (3.0 average; Figure
3-52; Table 3-8). At Station N9, two replicates had an indeterminate RPD and one
replicate had no RPD visible due to the presence of gray clay. Seven replicate images
collected throughout the region had a visible redox rebound ranging from 4 cm to 7 cm
depth, suggesting a recent reduction in RPD depth.
The biological assemblage at the Northern Region stations showed a dominance of
Stage II organisms (amphipods) with some Stage III organisms present (Table 3-8). The
Stage II organisms settle and create dense tube mats on the sediment surface, filtering
particles from currents they create at the top of the tubes. This high density of tubes and
filtering activity may serve to exclude Stage I organisms. Only a few replicates were
suspected of having retro-Stage II conditions. Stage III organisms, indicated by sub-
surface feeding voids, were present in 13 replicates of the Northern Region stations
(Figure 3-53).
Median OSI values ranged from +1 to +11 over the Northern Region, with an
overall average of +7.4 (Table 3-8). The majority of the stations had OSI values > +6.
The lowest OSI was detected at Station N9, where gray clay was present from the nearby
Seawolf disposal mound. The highest possible OSI value, +11, was calculated for four
replicate images and assigned to Station N8. Neither low dissolved oxygen conditions nor
methane were observed in any of the photographs collected in September 1997.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 ~ 1998
SCIN JO UOIZO1 WISYON ou} JOAO Sonyea [SO pue Gdy Jo uonqmsiq °7S-¢ aansIy
ISO
W suonels @SLOWSY Uolbey UeyON
du
Asepunog ajis jesodsig snolAeld
M .000°¥0 oz
NM .00S°0 22
AA .000°S0 22
N .00V'9L obv
VAS
¥ obeiny Teen J ‘
Cpe Cee AY | iy
N .009°91 ob?
ey ®
eV N ° oo WON 76 | 9N 6L gv 8N >
i Ge pelte” toss fect
Asepunog eS jesodsig yuauing
N .008°91 obv
AnewAujeg 66) Jequieydes
uoibey UJOYON SCIN - SUOI}E}S @s}owSY L661
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
147
The Northern Region of the NLDS is an area that is relatively flat and uniform
supporting a stable, mature benthic community. The depths in the northern half of the
region are too shallow to accommodate placement of mounds, but the slope may provide
some containment for projects placed in the southern half. Historical dredged material was
observed with REMOTS® sediment profile photographs and in each case found to be
supporting a healthy benthic community.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
148
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The New London Disposal Site (NLDS) monitoring results from 1992-1998 form a
time-series of observations of individual mounds and the site as a whole including
reference areas. This time-series provides insights into physical and biological processes
and any potential environmental impacts from the disposal of dredged material at the site.
This section provides conclusions for the site and each individual mound or region
surveyed (and recommendations for site management).
5.1 Overview of Monitoring
e A dredged material management strategy has been successfully developed for NLDS
that takes into account regional influences over the site as well as site-specific
constraints on dredged material disposal. This strategy has incorporated the use of off-
site reference areas to determine regional effects on the site. It also uses preexisting
disposal mounds, and a planned placement of mounds to form a "ring of mounds," that
will both contain the spread of dredged material on the seafloor and allow
unacceptably contaminated dredged material (UDM) to be capped with a minimum
amount of capping dredged material (CDM).
e The configuration of disposal mounds at the NLDS has remained stable over at least
the last twenty years between master surveys, indicating stability of the mass of
material at the disposal site, despite sorting and winnowing of surficial fine-grained
material. There is strong evidence of stability of deposits placed at NLDS as much as
twenty to thirty years ago (NL-RELIC, NL-I, -II, -III and -TR).
e All areas surveyed during this period showed evidence of healthy, stable benthic
communities and rapid recolonization of dredged material following disposal
activities.
e Biological activity had a strong seasonal impact on surface sediments. Widespread
settlement and growth of tube-building organisms promoted deposition of fine-grained
sediment on the surface of NLDS. Senescence or migration of these organisms
caused decomposition of tubes and removal of fines and tubes leaving coarser
sediment on the surface.
e Physical and biological monitoring data from the NLDS were consistent with a model
of seasonal winnowing of surficial fine-grained material. This process serves to armor
the disposal mounds with a surficial scour lag deposit providing a mechanism for long-
term stabilization of the mounds.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
5.2
149
Reference areas reflected conditions throughout NLDS including: seasonal responses
to biological and physical processes and apparent impacts of low dissolved oxygen or
organic enrichment. All reference areas supported stable, healthy benthic
communities. In 1992 reference area conditions based on the Organism-Sediment
Index (OSI) improved over results from 1991, improved again in 1995 and 1997 and
remained stable in 1998. An increased presence of Stage II and Stage III organisms at
NLON-REF and NE-REF has resulted in higher OSI values and increased RPD
depths. Conditions at WEST-REF exhibited signs of a recent benthic disturbance in
1992 and 1995. Low OSI values relative to NE-REF and NLON-REF, and a Stage I
or Stage I over Stage III population suggests the area was in recovery from a localized
disturbance.
Dow/Stonington and NL-91 Mound
The NL-91 and D/S mound complex is located in a flat “bowl” formed by
surrounding disposal mounds that provides protection from storms and tidal currents.
This mound complex was stable throughout the survey period and supported
development of a healthy benthic community.
Sediment deposition during disposal and capping operations during the 1991-92
disposal season yielded a maximum mound height of 0.7 m at the D/S buoy location
and 0.5 m at the NDA buoy location. Disposal operations resulted in the
development of overlapping areas of deposition: a low mound at the NDA buoy, an
elongated low mound extending eastward from the D/S buoy and a layer of sand
mixed with shells and pebbles over a portion of both of these mounds.
Inconsistencies in navigation and disposal barge positioning during CDM deposition
caused the cap material to be placed somewhat to the east of the main disposal mound.
During capping operations, the coordinates for capping points were apparently
misinterpreted causing an offset (250 m to 400 m) to the southeast.
The material deposited at the CDM points was composed mainly of black silt covered
by a layer of biologically-reworked dredged material and fine sand. This bottom
feature supported a stable Stage II benthic infaunal assemblage.
The material deposited at the D/S buoy was composed of black silt covered with a
sand layer 2-7 cm thick. The sand layer was consistent with material from the Port
Niantic project disposed at the nearby NDA-91 buoy. This area supported a stable
Stage II benthic infaunal assemblage.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
150
3.3
Monitoring activity over the NL-91 and D/S mound complex in 1995 and 1997
continued to show mature and healthy benthic infaunal populations and sand-over-mud
layering over the mound.
The recolonization of the area by a diverse benthic community (Stages II and III),
representing a broad range of sensitivities, indicates that sediment toxicity and chronic
impacts are non-existent or unlikely. The response of the benthic community is a
direct indicator of potential for adverse effects and supports a conclusion that either
the UDM material was isolated by the surface sediments or the sediments were
conservatively classified during the regulatory process. Nonetheless, as a prudent
management measure, additional sediments were directed to this location in 1997-
1998 to thicken the cap, accompanied by periodic monitoring to assess any changes.
Additional cap material was placed over the central area in 1997-1998 as a
conservative management response to the relatively thinner cap coverage attained
during the project. A layer of new CDM (2-10 cm) was detected over the central
region of the mound using REMOTS® sediment-profile photography.
Normal rates of biological recolonization of the mound were observed in 1998. Areas
of new CDM had a combination of initial and advanced successional stages showing
the standard progression of recovery of the benthic community.
USCGA Mound
The USCGA Mound was formed in 1994-1995 from 124,000 m3 of material from the
U.S. Coast Guard Academy. Approximately 80,500 m3 of CDM was placed over
43,500 m3 of UDM creating a mound 420 m wide and 1 m high at the apex. The
mound overlapped and merged with the historical NL-TR Mound in the northeast
quadrant of the NLDS.
REMOTS® sediment profile results in 1995 indicated that the capped mound was
supporting a healthy benthic community. Some stations showed evidence of impact
from low dissolved oxygen or organic enrichment, but this was also seen at the
reference areas and is attributed to regional conditions of stress.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
5.4
S)o5)
5.6
151]
NL-94 Mound
The NL-94 Mound was formed in 1994-1995 from 37,000 m3 of material from the
U.S. Navy Submarine Base. Approximately 28,200 m3 of CDM was placed over
8,700 m3 of UDM creating a mound 125 m wide and 0.9 m high. A tongue of
dredged material 20-40 cm thick extended 140 m southeast from the mound apex.
REMOTS® sediment profile results in 1995 indicated that the capped mound was
supporting a healthy benthic community. This represented faster recovery than
expected. Some stations showed evidence of impact from low dissolved oxygen or
organic enrichment, but this was also seen at the reference areas and is attributed to
regional conditions of stress.
Additional suitable material was placed in 1996-1997 to the west of the NL-94 Mound
at the NDA-96 buoy. The NL-94/96 Mound complex forms a flat ridge in the western
center of the NLDS between the southern edge of the Seawolf Mound and the
northern edge of NL-I.
REMOTS® sediment profile results in 1997 indicated that the new dredged material
was supporting a healthy benthic community and recovered more quickly than
expected.
Northern Region
The master bathymetric survey conducted in 1997 extended into an area termed the
Northern Region to provide baseline characterization. The plateau and apron of the
Seawolf Mound extended into this region, indicated by both bathymetric and
REMOTS® data. Historical dredged material was detected in the Northern Region
and can be related to pre-DAMOS disposal in the vicinity of the NL-RELIC
Mound. The older age of this disposal activity is reflected in a higher successional
status compared to the reference areas, for both ambient sediments and historical
dredged material.
Recommendations
The capped mound formed at Dow/Stonington should receive additional material to
ensure sufficient cap distribution (50 cm) over all UDM placed at these sites.
Following placement of additional CDM, monitoring of the mounds should include
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
assessment of benthic recolonization and dredged material thickness across the
mounds’.
e Future surveys at NLDS could optimally be scheduled after recolonization has begun
(early June) but before mid-August when tube mats appear to senesce.
* During the 1998-2000 disposal seasons, over 20,000 m’ of CDM from a number of projects
was placed at the D/S mound to augment the cap. Monitoring of the D/S mound was
conducted during the summer of 2000, including bathymetric and REMOTS® surveys. The
results of these surveys will be published in a subsequent report.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
153
6.0 REFERENCES
Bokuniewicz, H. J.; Gebert, J.; Gordon, R. B.; Higgins, J. L.; Kaminsky, P.; Pilbeam,
C. C.; Reed, M.; Tuttle, C. 1978. Field study of the mechanics of the placement of
dredged material at open-water disposal sites. Volume II: Appendices J-O. Dredged
Material Research Program. Technical Report D-78-7. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Carey, D. A. 1998. Long Island Sound Dredged Material Management Approach. A study
report prepared for State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection,
Office of Long Island Sound Programs, Hartford, CT. 189p, Separate Appendices.
Chang, S.; Steimle, F. W.; Reid, R. N.; Fromm, S. A.; Zdanowicz, V. S.; Pikanowski, R.
A. 1992. Association of benthic macrofauna with habitat types and quality in the New
York Bight. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 89: 237-251.
Fredette, T. J.; Kullberg, P. G.; Carey, D. A.; Morton, R. W.; Germano, J. D. 1993.
Twenty-five years of Dredged Material Disposal Site Monitoring in Long Island
Sound: A Long-Term Perspective. Long Island Sound Research Conference
Proceedings, October 23-24, 1992. Publ. No. CT-SG-93-03, Connecticut Sea
Grant Program, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT.
Fredette, T. J. 1994. Disposal site capping management: New Haven Harbor. Reprinted
from Dredging '94, Proceedings of the Second International Conference, November
13-16, 1994. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham,
MA.
Germano, J. D.; Rhoads, D. C.; Lunz, J. D. 1994. An integrated, tiered approach to
monitoring and management of dredged material disposal sites in the New England
Region. DAMOS Contribution No. 87 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-90/7575&234).
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA.
Germano, J. D.; Parker, J.; Eller, C. F. 1995. Monitoring cruise at the New London
Disposal Site, June-July 1990. DAMOS Contribution No. 93 (SAIC Report No.-
90/7599&C93). US Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham,
MA.
Kaputa, N. P.; Olsen, C. B. 2000. Long Island Sound Summer Hypoxia Monitoring
Survey 1991-1998 Data Review. Draft February 2000, Bureau of Water
Management, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, CT.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
154
Knebel, H. J.; Signell, R. P.; Rendigs, R.R.; Poppe, L.J.; List J.H. Jn Press. Seafloor
environments in Long Island Sound estuarine system. Marine Geology.
Millis, E. L. 1967. The biology of an ampeliscid amphipod crustacean sibling species pair. J.
Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 24: 305-355.
Morris, J. T. 1996. Monitoring cruise at the Central Long Island Sound Disposal Site,
September 1995. SAIC Report No. 373. Draft report submitted to U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA.
Morris, J. 1998. Monitoring cruise at the Western Long Island Sound Disposal Site, July
1996. DAMOS Contribution No. 119. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New
England Division, Concord, MA.
Murray, P. M.; Selvitelli, P. 1996. DAMOS navigation and bathymetry standard operating
procedures. SAIC Report No. 290. DAMOS reference report. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA.
Murray, P. M.; Saffert, H. L. 1999. Monitoring cruise at the Western Long Island Sound
Disposal Site, September 1997 and March 1998. DAMOS Contribution No. 125.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Concord, MA.
Naval Underwater Systems Center (NUSC). 1979. Disposal Area Monitoring System
(DAMOS) annual data report-1979. Submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
New England Division, Waltham, MA.
New England River Basins Commission (NERBC). 1980. Interim plan for the disposal of
dredged material from Long Island Sound. New England River Basins Commission.
Boston, MA. Pp. 1-55.
Parker, J. H.; Revelas, E. C. 1989. Monitoring survey at the New London Disposal Site,
August 1985-July 1986. DAMOS Contribution No. 60 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-
86/7540&C60). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham,
MA.
Parsons, T. R.; Maita, Y.; Lalli. C. M. 1984. A manual of chemical and biological
methods for seawater analysis. New York. Pergamon Press, 173 pp.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
155
Pearson, T. H.; Rosenberg, R. 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic
enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanog. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev.
16: 229-311.
Poindexter-Rollings, M. E. 1990. Methodology for analysis of subaqueous sediment
mounds. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS. Technical Report D-90-
2. 110pages + appendix.
Revelas, E. C.; Germano, J. D.; Rhoads, D. C. 1987. REMOTS® reconnaissance of
benthic environments. Coastal Zone '87 Seattle, May 1987.
Rhoads, D. C.; Germano, J. D. 1982. Characterization of organism-sediment relations
using sediment-profile imaging: An effective method of Remote Ecological
Monitoring of the Seafloor (REMOTS® System). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8:115-128.
Rhoads, D. C.; Germano, J. D. 1986. Interpreting long-term changes in community
structure: A new protocol. Hydrobiologia 142:291-308.
SAI. 1980. Disposal Area Monitoring System Annual Report - 1980. Volume I Physical
Measurements. DAMOS Contribution No. 17, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
New England Division, Waltham, MA.
SAIC. 1985. Standard operating procedure manual for DAMOS monitoring activities:
volume I and volume II. DAMOS Contribution No. 48 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-
85/7516&C48). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham,
MA.
SAIC. 1988. A summary of DAMOS physical monitoring of dredged material disposal
activities. SAIC Report No. SAIC-88/7527 C71. Submitted to U.S. Army
Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. April 1988.
SAIC. 1990a. Monitoring cruise at the New London Disposal Site, July 1987. DAMOS
Contribution No. 66 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-88/7511&C66). US Army Corps of
Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA.
SAIC. 1990b. Capping survey at the New London Disposal Site, February 3, 1989.
DAMOS Contribution No. 71 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-89/7554-C76). US Army
Corps of Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
156
SAIC. 1990c. Monitoring cruise at the New London Disposal Site, August 1988. DAMOS
Contribution No. 77 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-89/7557&C77). US Army Corps of
Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA.
SAIC. 1995a. Sediment capping of subaqueous dredged material disposal mounds: an
overview of the New England experience. DAMOS Contribution No. 95. (SAIC
Report No. SAIC-90/7573&C84). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England
Division, Waltham, MA.
SAIC. 1995b. Monitoring cruise at the New London Disposal Site, June 1991. DAMOS
Contribution No. 96 (SAIC Report No. SAIC-92/7622&C101). US Army Corps of
Engineers, New England Division, Waltham, MA.
Silva, A. J.; Brandes, H. G.; Uchytil, C. J.; Fredette, T. J.; Carey, D. A. 1994.
Geotechnical analysis of capped dredged material mounds. In: McNair, E.C. Jr.
(ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dredging and
Dredged Material Placement, Vol. I. Lake Buena Vista, FL., Nov 13-16, 1994.
Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., New York, pp. 411-419.
Strickland, J. D. H.; Parsons, T. R. 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analysis.
Fisheries Resources Board Canadian Bulletin. 167 pp.
Tyson, R. V.; Pearson, T. H. 1991. Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia: an
overview. In: Tyson, R. V. and T. H. Pearson (Eds.) Modern and ancient shelf
anoxia. Geological Society of London, Special Publication # 58, London. 470 pp.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), New England District. 1982. Final
programmatic environmental impact statement for the disposal of dredged material
in the Long Island Sound region. Waltham, MA.
U.S. Navy. 1973. Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Dredge River Channel,
Naval Submarine Base, New London, CT. May 1973.
U.S. Navy. 1975. Environmental survey of effects of dredging and spoil disposal, New
London, CT. First Year’s Studies July 1974-July 1975. Vol. 3 of Supplement to
FEIS, Dredge River Channel, Naval Submarine Base, New London, Groton, CT.
Prepared by U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Region, Middle
Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Center,
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
157
Waddel, E. V.; Hamilton, P.; Carey, D. A.; Morris, J. T.; Kincaid, C.; Daleo, W. 1999.
Observations of physical oceanographic conditions at the New London Disposal
Site, 1997-1998. SAIC Report No. 453. Draft report submitted to U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, New England District, Concord, MA.
Wentworth, C. K. (1922). A scale of grade and class terms of clastic sediments. J. Geo.
30:377-390.
Monitoring Cruise at the New London Disposal Site, 1992 - 1998
Seem Aen
ed Als
acutd. cae ES) SS ee ie ee
Golf. a Aloo n
lscorettl' A bite:
Sy i 19Sp ied dimenr capping OF submenus daeiaien: timate tal: repeal xooanes
SAK.
IF
US,
Ralraipistation: Nationald
| Arty f he yess of Bing an ven
oh a ie wean pecs ASK ES ERC AOS
dion te somaersvertiome ander MN
fst bad a ohh |
UHOGP WOR HCE Wablave dai TAS .RCCr-TROE
AM .trooteD Johari bash wol ersenigndl To ag
er AE CHS! YoY
ec ee wae
Re oor re NG, SAK, Kor ace. @ hime ne fg pry of a aig’
a Amen Wattham, MA a0. " ; a er és
Vs, wiler b.. Ae. M Ue} ryt, {, ¥ m By fay Carey, Bs ‘i ; ;
Castectod | of Ganped Sree ara coonnds; fn! McWNairi Bi ;
feel yy Pr uy! the Second aameminnel ee onfarence on Dodging af
Dredeod Material Placimeat: Yok. if Lake Bena Vity Bs sid
Amer, Soc, Civ. Bag, ‘New Yo het we ee ee ie
i.
Highere: Re OMT eer) Cai Basin, 67 isan
ty is 5 Pears th oe Mode Hitt archon 6 nse
yyerrtiene’y rl b mi He ": ee PALM ids.)
‘ie hen eee
ati* hy A *, i ia te diva
a
t sRipeeia sii by
_ peteoonaaara the weno ine nak . nk set OR
ry Lhac A fee me par nat: sia ¢
Navy. 1974. Rey vibe Dewi Karvinnoentad
Navel & sbnatine, ite Neti it
)
ere y 197 yy “Bing vitoruenetia asp
here o,f Cr. First: Your’ is _
FEMS, Doodge River Chax wh bison
Prepared by U8 Departmemr gts
filpasia. Conceal Fiabe: e
INDEX
aerobic, 26
anoxia, 24, 156
azoic, 126
barge, xiii, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 82, 141, 142,
144, 145, 149
disposal, 149
benthos, xiii, xiv, 1, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
22, 23, 24, 26, 33, 42, 48, 62, 67, 72, 76,
82, 90, 98, 100, 106, 110, 115, 122, 125,
126, 128, 129, 134, 136, 138, 139, 140,
141, 144, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151,
1524153), 155
ampeliscids, 26, 62, 82, 85, 110, 137,
154
amphipod, 11, 26, 62, 72, 76, 82, 85, 94,
106, 110, 119, 125, 126, 128, 135,
136, 137, 140, 141, 146, 154
bivalve, 26
deposit feeder, 11, 26, 62, 125, 128
macro-, 24, 26, 153, 155
mussels, 135
polychaete, 11, 26
bioturbation, 26, 135, 137
feeding void, 119, 130, 139
foraging, 26, 136
boundary roughness, 22, 24, 62, 72, 76, 85,
94, 100, 106, 119, 125, 126, 128, 129,
136, 146
buoy, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 28, 44, 48,
55, 67, 90, 98, 106, 110, 115, 122, 133,
134, 138, 139, 141, 144, 149, 151
disposal, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 16, 98, 144
taut-wire moored, 4
capping, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 28, 44, 82, 138,
ADA SAS 49 ol >So Ds 156
circulation, 135, 137
colonization, 138
conductivity, 19
consolidation, 12, 48, 141
containment, 3, 4, 147
contaminant
New England River Basin Commission
(NERBC), 3, 154
CTD meter, 19, 40, 41
currents, 4, 26, 119, 135, 136, 140, 144,
149
speed, 136
decomposition, 136, 148
density, 19, 22, 40, 85, 119
deposition, 1, 8, 10, 16, 33, 98, 115, 135,
136, 140, 146, 148, 149
dispersive site
Cornfield Shoals (CSDS), 3
disposal site
Central Long Island Sound (CLIS), 3,
134, 154
Cornfield Shoals (CSDS), 3
New London (NLDS), xii, xiv, 1, 2, 3,
ASS O98. 9p LOM 12. ASA 4s Ss 16;
18, 19, 20, 21, 26, 33, 36, 39, 42, 44,
55, 62, 67, 82, 90, 110, 115, 122, 125,
129! 13351345185, 1365 18721885
141, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151,
S22 SS elS4 S55 london
Western Long Island Sound (WLIS), 154
dissolved oxygen (DO), xiii, 10, 11, 26, 40,
41, 42, 67, 72, 82, 90, 94, 98, 106, 119,
125, 126, 129, 130, 136, 137, 149, 150,
IS
erosion, 26, 128, 135, 140
feeding void, 119, 130, 139
fish, 154
fisheries, 156
grain size, 22, 24, 55, 67, 76, 85, 100, 106,
119, 122° 12551268128 16m
habitat, xi, 22, 26, 33, 42, 11O0;122128;
129, 138, 153
hydroids, 128, 135
hypoxia, xiv, 26, 42, 136, 137, 153
methane, 26, 27, 67, 72, 90, 98, 106, 119,
WSS, WAG, WAL), KO, SiC eI
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), 21, 156
New England River Basin Commission
(NERBC), 3, 154
oxidation, 136
recolonization, xiv, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 22,
42, 48, 67, 76, 82, 90, 98, 137, 138, 139,
141, 146, 148, 150, 152
reference area, xiv, 10, 11, 12, 14, 33, 39,
40, 42, 85, 90, 106, 122, 125, 126, 128,
129; 18091337134, 13591367137, 138;
139, 140, 141, 144, 146, 148, 149, 150,
151
reference station, 11, 62, 76, 106, 122, 125,
126, 134, 136
REMOTS®, xiii, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22,
230 DAs 26) 2128530; 61e 32) 33934530.
37, 38, 39; 42, 48, 55, 62,67, 72, 76, 82,
90, 94, 98, 100, 106, 115, 122, 125, 126,
128, 129, 133, 134, 136, 138, 139, 140,
144, 146, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 155
boundary roughness, 22, 24, 62, 72, 76,
85, 94, 100, 106, 119, 125, 126, 128,
129, 136, 146
Organism-Sediment Index (OSI), 8, 22,
26, 44, 48, 67, 72, 82, 85, 94, 98, 100,
10S 11951255 12651293 1S OMS se
139, 141, 144, 146, 149
redox potential discontinuity (RPD), 22,
Soa
sediment-profile camera, 23, 82, 106,
NS) 5 WA WA), As. 22)
REMOTS®®, 26, 67
Organism-Sediment Index (OSI), 26, 67
RPD
redox potential discontinuity (RPD), 26
REMOTS®, redox potential
discontinuity (RPD), 22, 24, 26, 27,
62, 67, 72, 76, 82, 85, 94, 100, 110,
1125S 126s 12829 MISA 55
137, 139, 141, 144, 149
REMOTS®®, redox potential
discontinuity (RPD), 26, 125
salinity, 40
sediment
chemistry, 33
clay, 25, 55, 67, 76, 94, 1G0, 106, 115,
119, 122, 126, 146
cobble, 25
gravel, 25, 119
sand, 6, 9, 25, 55, 62, 67, 72, 76, 85, 94,
100, 106, 115, 119, 122, 125, 126,
128, 129, 135, 136, 138, 139, 140,
146, 149, 150
silt, 25, 55, 67, 76, 94, 100, 106, 119,
122, 125, 126, 129, 139, 140, 146,
149
transport, 26
shore station, 16
species
dominance, 24, 55, 72, 119, 129, 139,
146
stratigraphy, 55, 76, 85, 106, 119, 122,
129, 136, 146
succession, 155
pioneer stage, 11, 26
successional stage, 22, 24, 26, 67, 72, 82,
85, 100, 125, 130, 139, 150
survey
baseline, 13, 33, 44, 110, 115, 125, 133,
146, 151
bathymetry, xiii, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 44, 48, 62,
FONOSs OM oI 22 133.1 34a 4ie
144, 146, 151, 152, 154
REMOTS8®,, xiv, 9, 26, 28, 55, 152
temperature, 19
tide, 21, 135, 140, 149
topography, 4, 10, 12, 16, 21, 44, 90, 110,
115, 133, 134, 140
toxicity, 150
trace metals
vanadium (V), 11, 153, 156, 157
trawling, 24, 136
trough, 110, 134
turbulence, 136
waves, 4, 21, 24, 135, 140
winnowing, 76, 85, 106, 136, 146, 148,
150
Pei Void, 1 19, 130, 1A9
Pah 144
Rehories, 156
gras sive 22, 24, 53, 67/76, BS 100, 106.
p16, 12% 12521226, 128. tag 4a)
hatbin, wth 22 2G).8%) 42, 10, AD OB
Wi 29. (33, } 1S
by: iret. 1 of, eee
lyponia, tiv, 36, 42096, T2053
\
erutthiane,: 26,27, 7, 7
125, 120, TAR, VIO 137, Tae
Nationa! Oscanic and Atino ve it)
AMmoinintration (DAA), 2109 56. 08
| New Enghokd River Bast So on shee }
(NERBCY, 3; 134).
ak icixtiont) i at
¥en pepe xiv, Ltd,
42, 48. 67,76, 82, 00.982
bat; ae 148, {5G 752"
teferenice seea, Ki0,10; B hee tuky 44: sp
ue 40, : i. ‘85, 90, 106, 122. 125, sr 18),
NDS, Dat, 453; (34, WAS CGT R7, aR
PAG Lad, 149, 144, M6) 148, 28,
ey if P
_fekermace sation Phys2 a6; 106, yan an ith,
126, 434; 136
REMAN, xiii U0 Us 19, A
25: 28. TG PF 728; 30. 2 Bly: Bay 33, u; 6,
97,8, 3 42, 48, 35, 62,67, 92, By |
0) Pa, HR, 400, 106) 118, 122,008); 16,
“128, 1PM) GRD, 194,136, LRT IONE
144; 146, 147, 149, 150, 151 A
SeaBhocbbrek HeASeuibn Maa
72, 90, 98, 106,119, PPD PCP RED SSE SLE OLE.
. ou am bag ati
Me 1. f i ie
2
Seb it 95 ame |
i eh 94, Malin ho eee a
' SOpm HMM? Ov Seve a
anit eeetiniayst init
6, 44-48, 67, 72, yin
140, 149, 12-29 del eae
3 ie as
RO BK
Sh, py ts ;
ett a alg e
VTS. 122, 125, 728, FIER
west ‘aban Bi eare sltlax wy
rv phen frre ese Y
- dia uty ae
7 FR: T6, B2 SSS
re LS, 126, CPs, Ob,
at sont th ae #2 f
godine |
wloiaistry, 94) ”
clay, 25, 55, 67, 16; SF
PPO 122,126, hs
Sofa a5 Ob
satin i: 9) 25. $5, a2, OP;
100; 106) 15,4 oe
128, 129, 135, 136 uy
146,149, 1500"
wits, 24, 58, ie 16/9, .5
Appendix A
Disposal Logs
Al
1991-92 Disposal Season
SLE sv3 B14
SLE nos 02
009 sva 0€
oss 92
009 aS RcTd
00L nos 02
ose M-S 08
,00L
SL IMS OL
SZ SMS Ob
«P
OSb UOREIS-HO 00
SLS UONE}S-HO 001
009 UORE}S-HO 001
00L UOREIS-HO 00
008 UOREIS-HO 001
009 UORE}S-HO 001
UOREIS-HO
Aonqy
ees p
6cS'P
€cS'p
60S'p
60S b
8IS'b
cls b
css
L6r'b
60S'F
SL UOREIS-HO beep
ost UOREIS-HO bSeP
Ost UOREIS-HO LLeP
oSt UONEIS-HO Lee
Ost as Ol 2OPb
ost as Sb Be
ost as OL COb Pb
Ost Sv4 Ol Leb
ost Sv3 Ol €9EF
OS} sva OL bbb
ost 3S Sb GLE F
ost sv4 Ol LPP
ost Svw3 Ol Leb
OSt 3S Ol ZOPP
Ost nos OL Obb F
ost a-s 1G B6E'P
ost nos 10L Sbb'b
ost Nos OL Sbbb
ost as OF C084
ost nos Ol 28E°b
el
(ah
cl
cl
cL
cL
cL
cL
(ah
aL
cL
el
cl
cL
cL
cL
eL
el
cl
cL
el
cl
cL
él
cL
zl
eZ
cL
(ah
cL
cL
(ae
cL
cl
cL
cL
oll ZH WON JE JEO}eW BJULIN WO, jeJOL
ePA 7H VON JE [EOJeW ONUCIN HOd |ejOL
0291
91291
p02 91
20291
02°91
Z6L9L
8L'OL
86191
60291
20291
oll LA VON Je JEOJeW I)}ULIN WO, |ejOL
A _b# VON 38 Je}a}eW DNUeIN HO, /2}01
9S}'9t
Z22'9h
8819
cool
oor
ce 9b
Op ot
ZLp OL
cee Ob
92p'9t
SPE OL
61h 9b
SPE ol
ge'91
Leor
9e'9OL
g99e°91
9e°91
QE 91
Spe ol
eSeol
ZOE OL
cSe ot
eSe Or
cer OL
S9e91
uiwBuo} BapBuoy ujwne}
bP
be
bP
bp
by
bp
lp
el Z7# WON Je [eLE,eyy CULE JOW UBMD |e}0OL
ePA Z# VGN Je [e19;eW BupeW JOW UMD [e}01
by
bp
bb
bp
bp
by
be
oY 18 VON 28 [B6}e Wj CULE JOW UOMD |B}0L
ePA b# VON 38 Jee;eW BUpeW JOW UMD 12}01
by
bP
be
be
bP
lb
be
bp
bP
be
bb
be
bp
bp
te
be
bp
bp
bP
bp
oooooococe
oooooo°o
ooooooocooocococoooc0co0c ooo
Bape piz
Ww Song WON ey) Je peysodeg (ejs9)eWy JO EUINJOA [e}0)
«PA SAoNg WON e4} Je pay|sodeg je}Ja}eW JO EUINJOA Je}0L
SSL6Eb
9GLEEP
SSL6Eb
SSL6Eb
SSL6Eb
ySL6Eb
eGleer
SSL6EP
SSL6Eb
SSL6Eb
VSL6Eb
OGLEEP
SSL6Ep
0
0
0
0
LOL6Eb
8 9L6Ep
99L6EF
6 9L6Eb
bOL6Eb
6 9OL6Er
pOl6ep
G9L6Ep
G9OL6Eb
S9L6E¢
b9OL6Eb
S9L6EF
G9L6Eb
bOl6Ep
S'9L6Eb
G9OL6Ep
S9OL6EP
G9OL6Eb
8 OL6EP
G9l6Eb
py
oooooococaoe
9 PEL9z
0)
oooo 000
QEEL9Z
8 El19z
6G ee19z
8 EEL9z
bperoe
bPelLoe
peor
f vELoe
SB EE192
Z PELOS?
peEelge
CS vELOZ
f vELoz
bpeLge
S veloc
bPELoe
SPeloe
GS PELoz
PEeElge
vEL9e
pix
oO ooooooce
ooooo0o oo
oooooo0ocococooc0oocococo0co 9c 00
eyepdsip
16-98-21
16-98Q-L1
46-98-01
16-98Q-60
46-98-20
+6-989-90
+6-98Q-20
b6-AON-22
16-989-90
L6-AON-22
b6-AON-92
}6-AON-SZ
}6-AON-E2
}6-AON-22
}6-AON-bZ
}6-AON-02
}6-AON-61
SIN
SQN
SG1N
SIN
SGN
SCI1N
SIN
SGIN
SQ1N
SGIN
SGIN
SGN
SGIN
SGN
SIN
SIN
SIN
OILNVIN LYOd
SILNVIN LYOd
OILNVIN LYOd
OILNVIN LYOd
SILNVIN LYOd
OILNVIN LYOd
OILNVIN LYOd
OILNVIN LYOd
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
OILNVIN LYOd
OILNVIN LYOd
OILNVIN LYOd
OILNVIN LYOd
SILNVIN LYOd
SILNVIN LYOd
OILNVIN LYOd
“ONIOILNVIN LYOd
“ONIOILNVIN LYOd
“ONI OILNVIN LYOd
“ONT OILNVIN LYOd
“ONT OLLNVIN LYOd
“ONI ‘OILNVIN LYOd
“ONT OILNVIN LYOd
“ONT OILNVIN LYOd
VNIYVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
Aong Z# VAN
“ONT OLLNVIN LYOd
“ONT OLLNVIN LYOd
“ONT 'OILLNVIN LYOd
“ON OILNVIN LYOd
“ONT ‘OILNVIN LYOd
“ONI ‘OILNVIN LYOd
“ONT OILNVIN LYOd
}6-AON-92
16-AON-02
}6-AON-61
}6-AON-BL
}6-AON-SL
}6-AON-SI
}6-AON-ZL
+6-AON-80
+6-AON-90
16-490-S2
$6190-be
1690-2
16-190-€2
16190-12
46-90-61
46-90-61
+6-190-Z1
16-190-91
16-190-S1
16190-+L
eaedsip
SQN
SGN
SIN
SGN
SQN
SGIN
SC1N
SGN
SG1N
SGN
SGN
SIN
SGN
SGIN
SGN
SQN
SQIN
SG1N
SGIN
SGIN
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVN YOW N3M9
VNINVN YOW NSM9
VNINVW HOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVAW HOW NSMO
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNIYVW YOW NSM9
VNIMVW YOW NSM9
VNIYVA YOW NS3M9
VNIYVW HOW NSM9
VNINVA YOW NAM9
VNINVW HOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW HOW NAM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
yoefoid
VNINVA HOW NSM9
VNIYVW HOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVI HOW NAM9
VNINVW HOW NAM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW HOW NSM9
VNINVW HOW NAM9
VNINVW YOW NAMO
VNINVAW YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NAM9
VNIYVW YOW NSM9
VNINV HOW NSM9
VNINVA YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNIYVW HOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
VNINVW YOW NSM9
Aong 1# WGN
ee}|uWed
Aong VGN 24} 10) pajyabuey jeuajyeyy pabpaig
cll [EL1OJBW S/G JO OUINJOA BJO}
sPA [BH93eW S/d 40 OUINJOA Je}OL
0002 ZS9°L
00S Sty
00S Ely Py
0SP v
0SP v
00S +
00S ¥
OSL L9P'P
00F +
0Sl L9b'y
SY Y
SV Y
Ov ¥
cW WGN 12301
ePA WON 18301
0€ L6r'P
0c S8P'P
02 S8P'P
09 69°F
S 6LS°P
ib S8b'P
GS LLYY
OE ELb'Y
St LSD
iS 68h
0€ SOP'P
cv
08 8SP'P
oF
cl
cL
cl
cl
cl
ZLI 9b
E91 OL
9L'OL
SOL'OL
9L'OL
Aonqy ulw6uo; Baphuo; uiwye}
ly
LY
LY
bY
by
Bapye| pz
ooooo0ocoocoooqo0co
ooooo0ocoocoeoo
ooooo0ooqooeocoeoo
G'SL6EP
GSL6EP
S'SL6Er
SLEEP
VEeLeer
co GL6EP
bSZ6Ep
¢SL6EP
SLEEP
SLEEP
co GL6EP
bSL6EP
0
SLEEP
0
pyA
9 PELOS
G'PELOe
G'vELOC
cf VEL?
9'PELOZ
P'PELOTS
€'vELIe
€ veloc
b'pELO?
PPELo?
0
So VELOC
0
0
0
GellpL cé6-uer-GL
0 c6-uer-pL
VCLLbL c6-UeL-EL
c6-Uef-cL
c6-UEL- LL
c6-uef-OL
c6-Uer-60
c6-Uer-80
c6-uer-20
c6-UeL-90
c6-uer-SO
c6-UeL-H0
c6-UeP-€0
ooooo0oococo9o
46-99Q-Zl
16-98Q-b 1
16-99-01
16-99-60
16-99-60
16-98-80
16-99-80
+6-99q-20
16-99-20
16-98-90
oooooo0ceooe°c eo
16-990-90
+6-99Q-S0
16-98-70
16-998q-€0
16-98-20
Y3AIY SSANVHL
YAY SANVHL
Y3AIY SANVHL
YSAIY SSAWVHL
YaAlY SSWVHL
YaAlYd SAWVHL
Y3AIY SSAWWHL
Y3AlY SAWVHL
Y3AIY SANVHL
Y3SAlY SSANVHL
USAIN SANVHL
YaAlY SAWVHL
YSAIY SAWVHL
SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS
SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS
SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS
SGIN YOSdVH NOLONINOLS
SGIN YOSYuVH NOLONINOLS
SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS
SG1N YOSYVH NOLONINOLS
SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS
SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS
SGIN YOSYVH NOLONINOLS
SG1N Y3SAlY SAWVHL
SG1N Y3aAlY SANVHL
SQN YSAIY SAWVHL
SIN YsAlY SAWVHL
SGN YsaAlYd SAWVHL
ayepdsip eaedsip yoafoud
Aong S/q 24} 403 payabuey jeluajzeyy pobpaig
WOIWSHOD MOG
WOINSHOD MOG
IWOIW3SHS MOG
WOINSHOD MOG
WOIWSHO MOG
WOIWSHO MOG
WOIWSHO MOG
WOINSHO MOG
TWOINWSHOD MOG
WOINWSHOD MOG
WOIWSHD MOG
WOINWSHOD MOG
WOIWAHOD MOG
WGD punowW S/d
NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL
NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL
NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL
NOLONINOLS 4O NMOL
NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL
NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL
NOLONINOLS 30 NMOL
NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL
NOLONINOLS 40 NMOL
NOLONINOLS 30 NMOL
Wan Ppunow s/d
WOINSHO MOG
WOINSHO MOG
TWOINWSHS MOG
WOINSHO MOG
WOINAHO MOG
Wan punow s/d
9a))luWWad
A2
1992-93 Disposal Season
ZS‘OrLp —-« W- PUNOW ZG-N AU} Je payisodap jevayew “Aly enBoydjed |e}01
00z9 «PA _punow Z6-1N 24} Je Paysodep jevayew “Ary anBoyoed [2}01
SGA Ob E0ESZOBO'ZZ- ESLBZIZZ ly EB/E/P MOONSLSAM JO NMOL 09620z661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd
00°0€ ZOESOOBO'ZZ- LISLEQZZ Ly eE/E/E MOOUSLSAM JO NMOL 09620z661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd
O0'Or LELE080'2@Z- SBrOZZ IY e6/Z/E YOONSLSAM JO NMOL 09620z661 YSAIY SNDOHOLVd
00°0S Z6bS080'%Z- S866SZZ7 1h E6/L/E MOOUSLSAM JO NMOL 09620z661 USA ANDOHOLVd
00'Or LELE080'Z/- SBPOOZZ ly e6/2z/z MOOUSLSAM JO NMOL 09620Z661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd
00°0S Z61S080'2/- S866SZZ 1p €6/92/z MOONSLSAM JO NMOL 09620Z661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd
00'Or Z6L€080'2Z- GBrOZZ ly eB/Sz/z MOOUELSSM JO NMOL 096202661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd
00'Ob E0ESZOBO'ZZ- EBLEZIL7 ly 6/Sz/Z MOOUELSSM JO NMOL 096z0z661 YAAIY SNDOHOLVd
00°0S €0ESPO8O'ZZ- EBLEZOLZ IY EE/EzIZ MOOUSLSAM 4O NMOL 096z20z661 YSAIY SNDOHOLVd
00'OF €OESZO80'CZ- EBLBCOLT LY ECb6/L7/e MOOUELSAM AO NMOL 096202661 YSAlIY ANDOHOLVWd
ye7 ajyeqsiq eysdsiq SeyIWWEd UWNUJIWEY
el PUNOW Z6-N Ou) Je paysodap jevayew Anen S/N [e}OL
ePA_punow Z6-1N eu) Je paysodap jeveyew AAeN SN 12101
00'Ob E0ESZOBO'ZZ- EBLBZOLZ Ih E6/6L/Z V4 IWAVN “AIG ‘HLYON ‘AAVN SN €0Z100661 NOTIN ‘ASVEENs IWAVN
00°02 696986L0'7/- LLSSEOLZ Lh EG/LL/Z V4 IWAVN “AIG ‘HLYON ‘AAWN SN €0210066! NON ‘SSVEENs IWAVN
00°02 696166L0'2Z- EBLELOLT LY EG/LL/Z WA IWAVN “AIG ‘HLYON ‘AAVN SN €0Z100661 NON ‘ASVEENS IWAVN
IW b/L ZOESOO8O'ZZ- LIGLEQLZZ Lh E6/OL/Z V4 IWAVN “AIG ‘HLYON ‘AAWN SN €02100661 NON ‘ASVEENs IWAVN
L€°0 ZOEGOO80'CZ- LIGLEOZZ Le €6/9/2 V4 TIWAVN “AIG ‘(HLYON ‘AAVN SM €0ZL0066l NOTIN ‘SSVaans IWAVN
ye7 gjeqsiq eysdsig BayIW8d WNU}IWWIY
el PUNOW ZG-IN je poy!sodap JEHaye/y SAOD PsojwNWY jeyOL
epA punowW Z6-N }e poyisodap JELayeYWy SAOD PsojUNWy je}OL |
OSZ a-N IWS 9I9€€h20'Cl- SSB6EE9Z lb Zé/0Z/01 SCN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GYOANNW Sc2900¢661 AAOO0 QHOAWNW
00€ a-N IWS 9L9ElPL0'CL- SS8PPE9C lh CE/9L/01 SCN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GHOANNW S2900¢661 AAOO0 QHOAWNNW
Gle a-N INS SL9ELPLO'CL- SSBPHE9C lb C6/SL/OL SCN NOILVIDOSSV SAO9 GHYOAWNW S29002661 AAOO GYOANNW
OSZé a-N IWS’ 9L9€6EZ0'C2- SGSBHLOLZ 1b CE/SL/OL SCIN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GHOAWNW Sz9002661 AAOO0 QHOANNW
Gle a-N IWS’ 6Y69CPVLO'CL- BBLEQE9C 1b ZE/SL/OL SCIN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GHOAWNW Sc900¢661 AAOO GYOAWNW
Glé a-N IWS’ 6Y690PZ0'2L- B8BL89697 lb Zé6/PL/OL SCIN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GHOANNW Sc9002661 AAOO GHOAWNW
OS/ I-N WIG” E8COSHLO'CL- CCG9BE9C Lh CE6/ZL/OL SCN NOILVIDOSSV SAO0 GHOAWNW Sz9002661 AAOO GYOAWNW
ajeqsiq eysdsiq
ye] BOWIWIId
winujWdad
punow @6-1N
z obey
el PUNOW ZG-N Ou) je payisodeq awnjo, peyodey je}o,
ePA_punow Z6-7N ey} Je payisodaq awinjo, payodey je}01
el PUNOW ZG-]N Ou) }e Payisodap jevayew saAry daaq jejo!
epA punow Z6-1N au) }e poysodap jevayew sanny deaq je}o)
0S6 O08¢ SGAOl 69611080'2Z- EB8L809L2 lb e6/Z/r SGN ONI VNINVW YSAIY da5d 80201066! YsAlY d3a3qd
008 OOE SCA 02 6961 1080'2Z- ESLBO9LZ Lb E6/OE/E SCN ONI VNINVW YSAIY d330 802010661 Y3AIY dad
006 OLE SQAOE ZELE080'72- SB8POOLZ 1h E6/EZ/E SG1N ONI VNINVW YSAIY da5d 802010661 Y3AAIYM dad
006 O0€ SGA OE 21080°22- c809L72 LY E6/LC/E SGN ONI VNINVW YSAIY d55d 802010661 YSAlY dG
006 OO€ SCAGZ 696986L0'22- LISOEOLZ Lh EB/9Z/E SGIN ONI VNINVW YSAIY d5a350 802010661 Y3AAIY d330
0S6 OOE SGAOE 2OESO080'ZZ- LISLEOLZ Lh E6/SZ/E SGN ONI VNINVW YSAIY daad 802010661 Y3SAIY d33d
006 O82 SGAOE 696LL080'2Z- EBLB809LZ Ib E6/PZ/E SG1N ONI VNIMVI YSAIY d535G 802010661 Y3SAIY dad
008 OO€ SGA SZ? EOESZOBO'2Z- EBLEZOLZ IP EB/Ez/E SGN ONI VNINVW YSAIY dad 802010661 YSAI d3a3aG
0S9 O8¢ SGASI cOESON80'CZ- LISLEOZZ Ly e6/Zz/€e SGIN ONIVNIYVW YSAIY da5d0 802010661 YaAlY daad
Aongsiq ye7 ajeqsiq osysdsig Sdo}IWAdg WNUj}IWaYg
ce PUNOW ZG-N OU} Je Pay!sodap jeUa}EW! JULIO SJOlld [EOL
ePA_punow Z6-7N up ye poy!sodap jeUa}eW JUIOd SOI [E}OL
ose OL%@ SGAG €E0ESZOBO'ZZ- EBLEZOZZ IY EB/EL/E SGN ONI VNINVN LNIOd SLOTMd 0S9108861 WNIMVW LNIOd S.LOld
008 OLE SGASL ZOESOOBO'ZZ- LISLESZZ Ly EeE/ZL/e SQN ONI VNINVNW LNIOd SLOTd OS9108861 WNINWW INIOd S.LOTld
002 OLE SGAGL ZOESOOBO'ZZ- ZISLEOZZ IY E6/OL/E SQIN ONI VNINVW LNIOd SLOTNd OS9L0886! WNINVIN LNIOd S.LOTld
00z OL€ SGAOL ZOESOO8O'ZZ- LISLESZZ Ly Ee6/OL/E SIN ONI VNINVW LNIOd SLOTd OS9108861 WNIYNVIN LNIOd S.LOTld
008 OLE SGAOE ZOESO080'ZZ- LIGLEQZZ Ly E6/E/E SCN ONI VNINVW LNIOd SLOTd OS9108861 WNINVW LNIOd S.LONd
0s8 OZ€ SGA OE ZOES008O'ZZ- LIGLEQZZ Ly EG/B/E SQ1N ONI VNINVW LNIOd SLOTd 0S9108861 WNINVW LNIOd S.LOTd
0S8 SHM__ SGA 02 SE98/620'22- EBLEBSLZ 1h E6/Z/E ONIVNINVIA LNIOd SLOM1ld OS9L0886 VYWNINVW LNIOd S.LOTd
Aongsiqg 7e7 ajyeqsiq oayisdsiq eaylwiead wnujWwied
A3
1993-94 Disposal Season
(No Disposal Reported)
A4
1994-95 Disposal Season
Dredged Material Targeted for the NDA 94 Buoy
Permittee
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
Pernnittee
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
DEPT/NAVY - PIER 17
Project
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVCR
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
Project
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
THAMES RIVER
Oisparea
NLDS
NLDS
NLOS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLOS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDOS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
Disparea
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLOS
NLDS
NLOS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLOS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLOS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
NLDS
Dispdate
26-Dec-94
27-Dec-94
27-Dec-94
28-Dec-94
28-Dec-94
29-Dec-94
30-Dec-94
30-Dec-94
31-Dec-94
2-Jan-95
3-Jan-95
4Jan-95
S-Jan-95
S-Jan-95
Dispdate
17-Jan-95
17-Jan-95
18-Jan-95
18-Jan-95
19-Jan-95
19-Jan-95
20-Jan-95
20-Jan-95
21-Jan-95
23-Jan-95
24-Jan-95
24-Jan-95
24-Jan-95
25-Jan-95
25-Jan-95
26-Jan-95
26-Jan-95
27-Jan-95
27-Jan-95
27-Jan-95
28-Jan-95
30-Jan-95
31-Jan-95
31-Jan-95
1-Feb-95
2-Feb-95
2-Feb-95
3-Feb-95
3-Feb-95
4-Feb-95
7-Feb-95
8-Feb-95
8-Feb-95
8-Feb-95
9-Feb-95
9-Feb-95
11-Feb-95
13-Feb-95
13-Feb-95
14-Feb-95
14-Feb-95
Lat deg Lat min Long Deg Long Min DisBuoy DirBuoy CYVol
30° Ww 850
30° Ww 850
7s Ss 850)
30° Ww 850)
30° Ww 850)
uy S) 850)
75° Ss 850)
7s S) 850)
40' Ss 850)
75° Ss 750
50° SE 700)
80° S 700
65° S 850)
65° S 700
Total Pier 17 UDM at the NDA 94 Buoy yd? 11350}
Total Pier 17 UDM at the NDA 94 Buoy m? _—8678.21
Lat deg Lat min Long Deg Long Min DisBuoy DirBuoy CYVol
40° E 900
50° SW 900
30° Ss 900
20° SE 900
30° S) 900)
20° Ss 900
50’ Ss 900)
50° SE 900
90° SE 900!
50° S) 900)
50' SSE 900
40° SW 900
40° Ss 900}
50° Ss 900]
30° Ss 900
60' Ss 900)
50° SE 900
70° SSW 900)
50° Ss 900)
90" Ss 900)
90° Ss 900)
70' S 900)
50° Ss 900
60° SE 900)
50° SE 900
75 SW 900
100° Ss 900)
100° cS) 900)
100° Ss 900
100° Ss 900
300° Ss 900
300° SSE 900)
300° Ss 900
300° Ss 900
300° Ss 900
200° S) 900)
100 Ss 900)
75 Ss 900
75 S) 900)
300° SSW 900
300° Ss 900)
Total Pier 17 CDM at the NDA 94 Buoy yd? 68278:
Total Pier 17 CDM at the NDA 94 Buoy m? 52205.
Total Volume of Matenal deposited at the NDA 94 Buoy m? 79628.
Total Volume of Matenal deposited at the NDA 94 Buoy yd? 60883.7
Dredged Material Targeted for the USCG Buoy
Permittee a a
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 10-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 10-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 10-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 10-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 11-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 11-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 11-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 11-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 12-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 12-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 12-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 13-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 13-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 13-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 14-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 14-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 14-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 15-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 15-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 18-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 18-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 18-Jan-95
Total Eagle Pier UDM at the USCG Buoy yd?
Total Eagle Pier UDM at the USCG Buoy m?_ 43352.8
a Lat min
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 18-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 18-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 19-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 19-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 19-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 19-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 19-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 20-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 20-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 20-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 21-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 21-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 21-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 21-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 22-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 22-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 22-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 22-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 23-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 23-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 23-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 23-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 24-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 24-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 24-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 24-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 24-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 25-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 25-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 25-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 25-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 26-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 26-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 26-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 26-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 27-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 27-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 27-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 28-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 28-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 28-Jan-95
US COAST GUARD ACADEMY EAGLE PIER 28-Jan-95
Total Eagle Pier CDM at the USCG Buoy yd? 26225
Total Eagle Pier CDM at the USCG Buoy m? 200519
Total Volume of Material Deposited at the USCG Buoy yd? 3189:
Total Volume of Maternal Deposited at the USCG Buoy m? 243871
A5
1995-96 Disposal Season
Zeerst 30 Kong S6-VON el) 1e peysodeg euINjOA [e101]
osz0z sph hong S6-VGN ey} 1e pelisodeg ewunjoA |ej0)
600-16 IM SB 00z St Ste @L 89E Ot it ol 00zt E01 oe 96/1 1760)
60-01-16 SPM SL sat OSL SB b @ 99€ 91 lp o1 oost ozet ett 96/20/60)
600-16 STM SL ost $2 ChB b @ BEE 91 lp oF ocz oo! oor 96/90/60)
6E001-16 STM GL ost 002 BEB b 2 zse 91 tp o1 ocet ozs olor 96/90/60)
6EOOI-IG 4PM SL ost 062 EE b zl GEE OF Ip o1 ez! Ssot 006 = 96/SO/EO
6E0 01-16 STM 8 SLi SL SEB Db zl 99€ 81 Ip 4 ett 0001 og 96/ho/e0
GEO 01-16 STM SL ost SL LEB b @ ge 91 tp OL oe ooez 00l2 —-96/rOreO}
6eo Olle 4tM B ost G2l -6E6 b rd 2st OF ty ot oe6 oog 029 = 96/10/60
60-01-16 SfM 8 002 00l 66 2 zs€ 91 ip or oo1z Spelt SpLt 96/62/20
6E0-01-16 JIM OB 002 G@l heb cd BEE OL bp o1 008 cg oer 96/82/20
6E00l-16 4fM 8 o0z 00L 66 b 2 zs 91 ip oO Spoe S\6L edt 96/87/20
6E0-01-16 4PM OB 00z 00L = bbb @L BEE OF ly or Spal oat 00s} 96/22/20
6001-16 4TM 8 o0z SL OebB zL BEE Ot tp OL oc6t ooet 0091 96/92/20
6EO-0I-16 STM 8 ost 8 Leép @ y6E OL tp or oes osel Sieh 96/b2/20)
6E0 01-16 SPM 8 002 02 St6b a 996 91 iy ol Sbsi ert oezt 96/27/20
6E0-0l-16 SIM OG ose 02 = eh6'b @ eee OL Wy ol 00st oeel Spit g6/ez/20
6E0-01-16 rTM G8 oe S266 b 2 2se 91 ty oF eet oles ocot 96/12/20
60-01-16 SIM 6 oe 02 26 b 2 y6E Ot iy or oz! col oe 96/02/20
6E0-01-16 4M 6 o0e SG le6b @ 8 91 Wy ot Celt 0001 so8 96/61/20)
6E0-0l-16 tM SB ooe St eB b zl ee 91 tp oF oes 00/1 oost 96/51/20
6E00l-16 4mm SB ooe SZ SEB b 2 99€ 91 \y ol ocat OOLt oost 96/b 1/20
6EOOI-16 4PM OL ose $2 SE6b 2 99€ Ot tp o1 Stet Spot sre 96/61/20
6EO 0116 4PM ose 00h = L@6 zl SSE OL iy o1 of6t S\9 0091 96/60/20
6E001-16 4PM S6 le Ol lz b aL PoE OL ip ot 0091 oer oezt 96/80/20
6GE0-01-16 STM SB ose Gb lB by 2 OE OL iy or 00st Seel Oelh 96/40/20
6EOOl-16 4PM «SB ose Ob Keb F 2 86 91 ty or eet [oy os! 96/90/20
6EO0I-16 4th SB osz 0S St6b 2L 996 91 Ip ot seal SOI SISt 96/20/20
6E001-16 4tM 6 00€ 02 166 F 22 BE 91 ‘p ol oz6t Osdt 0091 96/10/20
6E001-16 SIM 6 ose 0S eB b 2L BEE OL p ol Spel o1el 0091 96/LE/L0
6001-16 4fM SB ooe Sk LEB b @ ee 91 ly ot or6l 008 Sot 96/08/10
6E00I-16 4IM 6 oe 001 = Ebb b zs see 91 ty ot 0061 Sect pst 96/62/10
6EOOII6 SIM OG ose S$ 1€6'b @ Be 91 tp OL OeLt o1gt Sip 96/92/10
6EOOl'16 4-M 6 Oo SG St6b 2 996 91 tp oF og! Spol oer 9672/10
6eo ole 4mm 8 ose Ob LEB 22 BE 91 ip o4 oz9t ozst ozet 96/22/10
6001-16 STM SB oe 02 «LEB F 22 ge 91 Ip o1 oes 0001 ee 96/61/10
6600116 4M SB ooe Ol SEB 2 996 O1 tp ot ty) szot oer 96/91/10)
6CO 01-16 STM 8 osz Ol SEB b zl 996 91 ty OL Orci o1gt ofr 96/51/10)
6coolle 4PM Se ove Ol 2B b 22 69 OF ‘y ot 8E91 o1st SieL 86/h 1/10)
6EO O16 STM 8 osz Ol EB F zz 2S€ 91 tp ol Spt stot Sith 96/21/10)
6EO0l-16 4TM oo Ol 616 @L Be Ot by ol zo8t Spol ert 96/41/10
60010b6 TOL Se ose 86S 0S 6166 2 eee oF ip OL Orel Sih oor 96/01/10)
6E0-01-16 4fM SB ose S Str el 996 91 tp o1 ocez 0012 0061 96/60/10)
6EO-0l-16 SIM 8 00 S St6y 2 99€ 91 Ip ot o1zz oc02 ore 96/90/10
6EOOl16 4M S8 ose S 92bb 2 902 61 tp ot Ovez ore oc0z 96/0/10)
6EOO116 AIM 6 oor St LEB 2 86 91 2 ot Spel ocel £91 S6/0E/21
6CO 01-16 4TM 6 oor Ol St6b 2 996 91 tp ol pat S2ut est s6mezeh
6EO-O1-16 JIM 06 ose S 6E6b ze zs€ 91 \y Z oozt SOL ooo! s6reeel
6EO 01-16 ~4TM «OG ose Ol 66 el @s€ Ot tp Z te) Size oo1z s6/ezel
6E001-16 4PM 06 ose ebb b zz BEE 91 Wy Z oze Sez 0z9 Serel/el
6001-16 4PM 08 ove Ol SB y @ 996 91 iy L ssoz 8e6h siah s6at/et
60010%6 TOL SZ ose 3N OS 164 @ ge 91 tp Z ore SSL 42) seaiet
600-1066 101 08 sl@ 9 3N 0S 616 2L eee ot Ip Z Orel Spal Opt S6/LI/2h
6001066 OL S@ oo = =3N OS 616b @ £8 Ob iy Z SSL sso oss S6/LI/24
60010F6 OL 08 sl@3N OS 616% al ee 91 lp Z S061 o1er SOLL Seale
6001066 TOL SB ooe 3N 0S 616 zz eee ob Ip Z 0e9 OS oz s6l/el
60010h6 TOL O08 sles 0S St6r @ 996 OL 7 Z Opdt pot Spst S6/si/eh
vtOOlIG SIM OL sh St 6E6 2L se Ot tp Z Segl Ossi oos S6/P heh
6001066 TOL Se oo 86S 0S E26 b el 69€ 91 ty Z sre Spe Spl S6/Pi/eh
6E0-01-16 4f-M G8 ove 3N OL «EB b @ See 91 tp Z oz oz oz S6el/eh
GEO 0116 "M06 Sze 3N GL St6b @ 99 OL tp Z ort oszt oozt Serie
60010h6 101 Se ooe 86S Of Sb 2 99€ 91 ip ol soez 0212 o10z S6aO/el
6001076 1OL 6 sze MS 0S €26F ee 69€ 91 ty 8 Spit OcoL oe semoet
6001066 OL 6 see 6S 0S Sth @ 99 91 tp 8 Spot Sb6 ore S6/LO/eL
600106 101 S6 ose 6S OS €26p 2 69£ 91 Ip 8 Shee, Sbi2 ovoz S6/Lo/et
60010b6 OL SB ooe 86S 0S 6f6 el 2S€ 91 ty 8 see see 0eZ s6g0/zt
6001066 Ol 6 see 6S SL léBb ra SSE 9b Ip 8 ssiz 0012 os6l s6s0/el
6001066 1O0l S6 ose 6S OS 6E6b @ 2S€ ot ty 8 0012 sloz siét S6/so/et
6001066 TOL 28 sles 0b LB b el SSE aL tp 8 Si6 see oed S6/sO/el
6001066 OL SB ooe MS 0S GEG F el 2S€ 91 Ip 8 oe0z of6! ocel S6/Po/et
600106 1OL 28 ooe 86S St L@6b @ SSE 91 ty ot ole ozo4 oe s6eorel
6EO-O1-16 IM «SB ose Ol eh b 22 eee 91 ty OL oo1 8e6t OeLt S6/OE/VE
6EO0I-16 4PM SB 00 02 «6b el BEE OF ty oL SO tpb oozt S6/LZ/11
6E0-01-16 4fM $8 ove GS ereb aL gee'ot 2 OL oe! oozt stor S6/Se/tt
WONLYSD dSNI L4VHC TOAAD HIG AONGYS NINDNOT D3GDNO7 NINLVT DSG1V1 ISIG SWILLaY 3WIldSIO SWildaG Slvodsia
419 SILSAW Y3AIY OILSAW
10 OLLSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW
19 SILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW ‘HAIN OLLSAW
10 OLLSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW
10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW
19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
49 OILSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW
10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
410 OLLSAW 'H3AIH OLLSAW
10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
10 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OLLSAW
10 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW 'W3AIY OLLSAW
19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW
LO OILSAW 'W3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW ‘H3AIH OILSAW
19 OILSAW ‘H3AIH OILSAW,
19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OLLSAW
19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW
19 OILSAW ‘H3AIY OLLSAW
410 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW ‘H3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW.
LO OILSAW "WSAIY OILSAW
19 OLSAW 'WSAIY OILSAW
10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW
10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW
410 O1LSAW 'H3AIY OLLSAW
10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW.
19 OILSAW 'W3AIY OILSAW
10 OLLSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
10 OILSAW ‘HAI OILSAW
10 OLLSAW ‘H3AIY SILSAW
19 OLLSAW 'H3AIH SILSAW
19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
19 OILSAW 'W3AIY OLLSAW
419 OLLSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
19 ONLSAW "YSAIY OLLSAW
19 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
YOBYVH NVILSN3A
HOBHVH NVILSN3A
YOBYVH NVILIN3A
HOBYVH NVILSN3A
YORBHVH NVILSN3A
YOBYVH NVILSN3A
HOSHYVH NVILSN3A
YOBHYVH NVILSN3A
YOBYVH NVILSNSA
YOBYVH NVILSN3A
HOSHVH NVIL3N3A
YOSYVH NVILSN3A
YOSHVH NVILSN3A
YORSYVH NVILSN3A
HORSYVH NVILSN3A
HOSHVH NVILSN3A
HOSHVH NVILSN3A
YOBYYH NVILSN3A
HOSYVH NVILSN3A
HOBHYVH NVILSN3A
YOBYYH NVILSN3A
YOSYVH NVILSN3A
YOBYVH NVILSN3A
10 OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW
1O OILSAW 'H3AIY OILSAW.
419 OILSAW 'H3AIY SILSAW,
10 OILSAW 'Y3AIY OILSAW
193fOud
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.\Y3M348
OLLSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3H8
OILSAW Lv GYVA LHOVA S.\WaM3Ya
OILSAW LV GHYVA JHOVA S.\W3M3YH8
OILSAW LV GHVA LHOWA S.H3M3498
SILSAW LW GQYVA LHOVA S.YSM3Y8
OILSAW LV GQYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3H8
OILSAW Lv GHYVA LHOVA S.YSM3H8
SILSAW LV GHYVA LHOVA S.W3M348
OILSAW LV GUVA LHOVA S.\H3M3H8
OILSAW LV GYVA IHOVA S.Y3M348_
SILSAW LY GYVA IHOWA S.Y3M3Ya
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.YAMauB
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.Y3M3Y48
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.\YSM3au8
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3u8
OIISAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3Y48
OILSAW LY GQYVA LHOWA S.\Y3M3H8
SILSAW L¥ GYVA JHOVA S.Y3M3YH8
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.Y3M3ua8
OLLSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M348
OILSAW LW GYVA IHOWA S.Y3M3H8
OILSAW 1V GYVA LHOVA S.W3M348
OILSAW LV GQYVA LHOVA S.W3M3u8
OILSAW Lv GQYVA LHOVA S.Y3M348
OILSAW LV QHVA LHOVA S.Y3M3H8
OILSAW LY GYVA LHOVA S.\H3M3H8
OILSAW LV GUVA LHOVA S.Y3M3u8
OILSAW LY GYVA LHOVA S.YSM3Yua
SILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.\Y3M3YHE
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.\H3M3YH8
SILSAW LV GHVA LHOVA S.Y3M3Y8
SILSAW LV GQYVA LHOWA S.\W3M3H8
OILSAW LY GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3H8
SILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.H3M3H8.
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.W3M3H8
SILSAW Lv GYVA LHOWA S.W3M3H8
OILSAW L¥ QHVA LHOVA S.W3M3H8
SILSAW LV GHVA LHOWA S.W3M3H8
OILSAW LY GHVA LHOVA S.Y3M348
OILSAW LY GHVA LHOVA S.\W3M3Y8
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.\W3M3YE
SILSAW LY GHVA LHOWA S.YSM3H8
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOVA S.\Y3M3H8
OILSAW LV GUYVA LHOVA S.YSM3Y8
SILSAW L¥ GYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3H8
90SS¥ INIOd 9NNO1NOLOYD
SOSS¥ INIOd SNO1NOLOHD
90SS¥ INIOd ONNO1NOLOYHD
O0SSV INIOd ONO7TNOLOYD
SOSSV INIOd DNO1NOLOYD
SOSSV¥ INIOd SNOT NOLOHD
SOSSV INIOd SNO1NOLOYD
SOSS¥ LNIOd SNO1NOLOYD
S0ssv INIOd 9NO1NOLOHD
S0SSv INIOd DNO1NOLOWD
SOSsv LNIOd DNO1NOLOYD
SOSSV INIOd DNO1NOLOYHD
OOSSV LNIOd SNOT NOLOHD
O0SSV INIOd DNO1NOLOHD
SOSSV INIOd SDNO1NOLOHD
SOSSV INIOd DNO1NOLOHD
SO0SSV INIOd ONOI NOLOWD
SOSSV INIOd ONO1NOLOHD
SO0SS¥ INIOd DNO1NOLOYD
90SSY INIOd SNO1NOLOHD
90SSV INIOd DNO1 NOLOHD
SOSSYV INIOd ODNO1NO1OHD
SO0SSV INIOd SNO1NOLOND
OILSAW Lv QYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3YN8
OILSAW LY GUYA LHOVA S.YAM3Y8
OILSAW LV GYVA LHOWA S.YAM3Ya
OILSAW LV CYVA LHOVA S.Y3M3Y8,
SS LLUNY3ad
065005661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00SE61
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
06S00S661
O6S00S665
O6SO00S661
O6S00S665
O6S00S661
06500661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S66t
06S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6SO00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S66!
O6S00S661
065005661
O6S00S661
06S00S661
O6S00S661
O06S00S661
06S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
06S00S661
BEL00S661
BELOOSEEL
8E100S661
8E100S661
BE L00SE61
B8E100S661
BEL 00S66)
BELO0SE6)
BELOOSEEL
BELOOSE6L
BELOOSEBL
BEL 00S661
BEL O0SE6I
BELO0SE6I
BEL 00S661
8€100S661
BEL O0SEEL
BE 1005661
BELOOSEEI
B8E100S661
BEL00SE6L
BELO0SE6I
BEL 00SE6I
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6S00S661
O6SO0SE61
SOZEL
SOlel
delet
eelel
69ZE1
162e4
O6/E1
c6LEh
Ole
8021
60LEL
LOLEL
80LE1
sole
poet
eoZel
zOlel
bozel
OoLel
669E1
869Et
L69E1
S69E1
v69EL
e69el
C69EL
\69E1
06961
S6SEI
S6SEL
L6SE1
g6SeL
66SE
OSE
Looe
cose
€09e1
POSE!
SOSEL
909E1
LL9EL
zoel
BO9EI
60961
SySEL
PySEl
OBlel
6LtEL
BLIEL
LLbet
elie
cLbet
iZieb
OLtEL
691E1
B9LEL
OLIel
29IEL
pLiel
SZIeL
geect
Lege
see2t
geez
cee2
veeet
cee
see7t
oee2t
682!
ecocl
2292
geez
S6-VON)
S6-VON|
S6-VON
S6-VON
S6-VON
S6-VON|
S6-VON
S6-VON
S6-VON'
S6-VON
S6-VON
S6'VON
S6-VON
S6-VONI
S6-VONI
S6-VON}
S6-VON
S6-VON|
S6-VON
S6-VON
S6-VON
S6-VON
S6-VON'
S6-VON'
S6-VON
S6-VON,
S6-VON'
S6-VON)
S6-VON|
S6-VON|
S6'VON|
S6-VON
S6-VON'
S6-VON)
S6-VON)
S6-VON|
S6-VON
S6-VON
S6-VON|
S6-VON|
S6-VON}
S6-VON)
S6-VON!
S6-VON|
S6-VON|
S6-VON}
S6-VON)
S6-VON)
S6-VONI
S6-VON
S6-VON|
S6-VON
S6-VON}
S6-VON
S6-VON|
S6-VON}
S6-VON|
S6-VON
S6'VON
S86 VON
S6-VON
S6-VON)
S6-VON|
S6-VON|
S6-VON!
S6-VON
S6-VON
S6:VON
S6-VON|
S6-VON|
S6-VON
S6-VON
S6-VON
WAN LIWY3d GI dWvS AON)
SbOOl-l6 =vwr ea oséh Ss Of vee b eZ tp 98 tb
SpOOl-l6 =vwr e2t 0o6t MSM 0S eve p aL 99 91 tp
SPOO}-16 VWF Ott osel N 4) S08 el v6r OL bp
SPOOlI6 =r ell osol MS OL cee b el 8b oL ib
SroOl-l6 =r Oz 0s¢t = MSS S Blab el Zivot ib
SpOOl-16 =vwr 901 OsoL M Se ese ed S6r OL ip
SbOOl-16 vWF Eat 0061 N 02 eer 2 vr OF bb
SPOOlI6 «=vWE 2b oset MS 08 cee P eZ ep 9b tb
$90°01-16 SHH E21 oset N 02 82bF eZ €05 9 te
$90°01-16 SHH E2t osdt s Ob Leo b aL 205 9b tb
SPOOlIG WWF 92t oo8t 3NN 8 S08 b el 66p 91 th
GrOOl-I6 =vwr 92 osé6! INN 43 208 b el 16h OL bb
SPOOl16 WWF Ott 008! 3Ss Ob 208 b el lpg Ip
SbOOl 16 WWT O2t OOdt Ss Sh 108 b el €9p OF ie
$90°05-16 SHH Osdt eee b 2 €0S 91 by
(90-01-16 SHH e2t osel 3 Ob (ob el tos ot Ve
$90°01-16 SHY OOLt Scop el tos 91 ib
{90-01-16 SHY E2t osel M Ot S28'b 2 tos ol tb
490°01-16 SHY E21 osst N Ob leap el tos ol ip
$90°01-16 SHH E21 oset 0 S28 bp 2 SOL tb
490°01-16 SHH 921 O06! 0 leap el sor tb
91010%6 950 OF oo8 N oo cee eL v6 9 bp
9001-16 SHH Ee2t osel N 0S lee b el vos 91 tp
190-0116 SHH E€2t osst N Ov leer e vos ol bp
}9001-16 SHH Eat osel M .02 Leap (aa 205 91 bb
90-01-16 SHH 91t oo8t N 02 8c8 b (qa tos gt 7
1900-01-16 SHH E€2t oo8t 0 Leap eL sol tp
$90°01-16 SHH Ott OOLt Ss Of 928 b eZ 86h 91 be
(90-01-16 SHH €21 oset s SL Sze b eZ 96h 91 bp
190-0116 SHH €2t 0061 N Ov Lee b ed €0s 91 bb
1900-01-16 SHH E01 oos! N 08 W2op 2 So ib
490°05-16 SHH O21 008! Ss 02 lay 2 96 91 bb
4190-01-16 SHY O21 Ost Ss Se ear e S6r Ot bb
90-01-16 SHH 91t osel 3 OL coy él SoL Ip
{90-01-16 SHH Oz OOZt s sO 928 b el €6p 91 ib
9101046 990 ob 008 N ool cee b el vor OL tp
(90-01-16 SHH Ett 009! M 02 leap 2 €0S5 91 ip
(90-01-16 SHH OZ osel a .02 cap el bos or tb
4190-01-46 SHH OOL OOoPrt N 08 bse pb el 4OS 9 by
190-01-16 SHH O21 oost E} Ob heap él 6p 91 te
9HOlOKE DOQ uF 008 N oo8 2e8 b el v6y OL te
$90-01-16 SHY O22 oset O €28b el €0S5 91 tb
$90-01-16 SHH Ett ose Ss S veo b e 20s OF ip
1900116 SHH Ott 0021 Ss S be8b el los ot pb
190-01-16 SHH OOL OO Ss S Seep el 40S 84 Vp
49001716 SHH Ott osel N SZ te8 p a €6r 91 ty
$90°01-16 SHH OO} osot Ss SE \28p (qa P91 tp
9101066 990 OF 006 N oot beep el ep 9b ip
$90-01-16 SHH €2) 009! N 0S Leap el 80S 91 tb
(9001-16 SHY O21 osdt 0 beep eZ gor tp
'90-01-16 SHY ELL Osc 0 SB ry (qa Or 91 Ib
9O10r DDG OL oo8 N ool ceB b e v6r 91 Ve
$90°01-16 SHH €2t oodt 0 Bley el SOS 91 Wy
4190-01-16 SHH bal oo8t 0 cep @ pos 9b tp
§90-01-16 SHH E21 008! 0 Lea y el eos 91 ey
{90-01-16 SHH O21 OoLt 0 deeb eZ €05 91 ip
(90-01-16 SHH O2t Oost a 02 eee b (7 20S Ot bb
19001-16 SHY E2t ooZt =] 02 See b eZ 20S OL by
1900116 SHY O21 OsZt 0 bee b el sos ot ib
(90-01-16 SHH ELL OsZt 0 Sc8 b el tos 91 ip
9001-16 Stitt Oat OOLt 0 928 b el 4os 94 Ib
(90-01-16 SHity 6 OOrt M Ot Lap el tos 91 ie
§90°01-16 SHH Ett asst 0 bee b (7 So Ip
9001-16 SHH eb osel M SG cep a Sol tb
{9001-16 SHH 9E€t os6l N ol Leap (qa sol bb
$90°01-16 SHU 62t s/o 3 06 cob ed SOb OF ip
190-O1-16 Shit} 9EL Os6h N of L278 b ed Ser 9 tb
(90-01-16 SHH et Osé6t 3 GL Scab eZ rol bp
$90°01-16 SHH E€2b 0061 M 08 28 F el €0S 91 tp
(9001-16 SHY 921 0061 M 001 cor aL 20S 91 bp
4190-01-16 SHH E21 Os6i M 0S bee b el 40S Ot Ip
490°01-16 SHH et Osét M GL beep 2 SBP 9 te
6E001-16 4M 6 ose 4 cB b 2 6p 91 Ib
6E0 01-16 4PM 6 ose Sk cap el 26P 91 tb
6E001-16 4PM 6 ose SG cep 2 d6p 91 bb
GEO 01-16 STM 6 oot 02 wee el 6p 91 itd
WNN1LY39
OL
O€0z
sset
Siob
SP9oL
S6/PO/LL
S6/PO/LE
S6EO/LE
SEEO/KE
S6/EO/LE
S6/ZO/L1
S6/ZO/KE
S6/2O/Kb
S6/LO/LE
SE/FO/LE
SE/LO/LE
SE/LO/LE
S6/LO/LE
S6/LO/LE
S6/LE/OL
SE/LE/O1
S6/LE/O
S6/LE/OL
S6/LE/OL
S6/LE/OL
S6/LE/OL
S6/OE/01
S6/OE/01
S6/OE/01
S6/0E/01
S6/OE/01
S6/OE/01
S6/0€/01
S6/OE/01
S6/62/01
S6/6Z/01
S6/62/01
S6/62/01
S6/ee/01
s6/ee/0l
S6/L2/01
S6/LZ/01
S6/L2/01
S6/Z2/01
S6/2/01
s6/9z/01
S69Z0l
se7ol
s6zol
S6/2/01
S6/BZ/01
S6/92z/01
S6/S2/OL
S6/S2/0L
S6/S2/01
S6/S2/01
S6/r2/01
S6/PC/01
S6/Pe/01
S6/pe/01
S6/P2/01
S6/E2/01
S6/ec/0l
S6/E2/01
S620)
s6fezol
S6EZ/01
S601
S6/e2/01
s6/ez/01
S6/e2/0l
6/22/01
S6/22/01
S6/I 2/04
S6/I 2/01
S6/12/01
S6/1 2/01
S6/90/1 4
S6/ZO/Lb
S6/LO/KA
S6/LE/OL
49 'NOGNO1M3N # NOLOHO 'H3AIH SANWHL
19 ‘NOONO1M3N 9 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWWHL
419 'NOGNO7M3N 9 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSNWHL
419 ‘NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'W3AIY SSAVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY S3SNVHL
410 ‘NOGNO1 M3N 9 NOLOHD 'H3AIN S3NVHL
49 'NOONO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWVHL
49 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH S3NWHL
49 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SANWHL
419 'NOGNO7 M3N ? NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
410 'NOGNO1 M3N ? NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N ® NOLOUD ‘H3AIY SANVHL
49 'NOGNO1M3N ® NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NWHL
419 ‘NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY S3NVWHL
49 'NOONO7M3N 3 NOLOUD 'H3AIY S3NVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH S3WVHL
19 'NOGNO1MAN 2 NOLOHD ‘W3AIY S3SNVHL
19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY SSNWHL
19 'NOLOHD 'W3AIN SAWVHL
49 ‘NOGNO7 M3N ? NOLOHD ‘Y3AIY SSAVHL
19 'NOONO1 M3N 2 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1 MAN 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY S3NVHL
19 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY SANWHL
4190 'NOGNO7 M3N 3 NOLOYD 'H3AIN SSNWHL
19 ‘NOGNO1M3N #8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIN SANVHL
19 'NOONO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SANWHL
19 ‘NOONO1M3N ® NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSWWHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL
49 ‘NOGNO7 M3N ? NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANWHL
10 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD ‘H3AIY S3WVHL
19 'NOONO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH S3NVHL
419 ‘NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
10 'NOLOHDS 'Y3AIN SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N ? NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY S3NVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY S3NVHL
19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH S3NWHL
419 ‘NOLOHO 'H3AIN SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 2 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIY S3NVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY S3NVHL
419 ‘NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOLOHD 'H3AId SSNVHL
19 'NOONO1 M3N 2 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSNWHL
19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 3 NOLOYD 'W3AIH SSNVHL
410 'NOLOUD 'Y3AIN SAWVHL
19 ‘NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
49 'NOGNO7 MAN 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIW SAWWHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 3 NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N # NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
410 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL
19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL
19 'NOONO1 M3N 2 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SSWWHL
19 ‘NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNWHL
19 'NOONO1M3N 2 NOLOHD ‘USAIN SSWVHL
19 'NOONO1M3N 2 NOLOWD 'H3AIH S3NVHL
19 'NOONO1M3N 8 NOLOHO 'Y3AIN SSWVHL
49 'NOGNO1M3N # NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
10 'NOOGNO1M3N 9 NOLOUD 'Y3AIU SSNWHL
19 'NOGNO17M3N 2 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
410 ‘'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNWHL
19 'NOGNO1 M3N 2 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSWWHL
49 'NOGNO7 M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWNVH1
19 'NOGNO1 M3N ® NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SSWWHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSWVHL
AIOMVWAS - AAVN/Ld30
STOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
J TOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVSS - AAVN/1d30,
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVIS - AAVN/Ld30
ASTOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVW3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS * AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
J TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMWAS - AAVN/Ld30
Lt Yald - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/Ld30
STOMVAS - AAVN/Ld30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMWAS - AAVN/1d30
JTOMW3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWSS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMWAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30,
2) Y3ld - AAVN/1d30
STOMVW AS - AAVN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
2) Y3ld - AAVN/Ld3G
SIOMVWAS - AAVN/Ld30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G0
A TOMWSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
AIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
Zt Wald - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
SOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
2) Y3ld - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWNW/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
A IOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
JIOMVW3S - AAVN/1d30
JTOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVIS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVNW/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ASNI 14VHYG TOAAD HI AONGYS NINDNOT D3GDNO7 NIWLV1 DAGiv1 1SIG 3WILLay aWildsia 3Wiid3d 31vddsid
103fOud
Y3AIY OLLSAW WNASNW 1uOdV3S OLLSAW
Y3AIY DILSAW WOSSNW LuOdv3S OILSAW
Y3AIY OILSAW WN3SNW LuOdW3S OLLSAW
YBAIY DILSANW_WN3SNW LYOdW3S OILSAW
B000Z661 bOOEL
ee000z661 POOEL
€e000z661 Oocet
80002661 666e1
EB000Z661 86621
€B000z661 26621
80002661 96621
80002661 6671
80002661 06621
EB000Z661 68621
€80002661 €6621
€e000cs6 1 y662l
80002661 6624
€80002661 16621
80002661 98621
€80002661 88621
£80002661 L862
€80002661 S862)
€80002661 veecl
€80002661 £8621
£8000Z661 ee6el
6S610r661 00621
80002661 61621
€80002661 82621
€e000c661 S621
€e000c661 08621
ee000z661 94621
80002661 \e621
€e000z661 L262
8000661 12624
€B000Z661 22624
©B000z661 e262
80002661 pl62h
80002661 69621
©80002661 0/621
6S6L0r661 66821
80002661 S96e1
EB000Z661 89621
80002661 9621
€e000c661 996el
6S610r661 86821
8000661 196c1
8000661 6s6c1
€80002661 e962
80002661 0962)
80002661 9621
80002661 y962t
6S610r661 26825
80002661 9S621
€e8000c661 Ls624
80002661 eséel
6S610F661 96821
80002661 pséel
80002661 Ssé2h
80002661 es6ch
80002661 2S621
©8000Z661 6r6el
€80002661 Lpé2t
80007661 (S621
€80002661 erect
e000z661 Os62
€80002661 9ré2t
80002661 Sr621
€80002661 pr6ZL
e8000z661 br6et
eB000z661 Er62t
80002661 Oré2i
€80002661 C474)
€8000z661 Be6z1
80002661 6E6c1
B000Z661 Le621
€8000Z661 9E621
L8L00SE61 s7zeel
28L00S66t peek
282005661 eee2
482005661 c2eek
S3LLUNY3ad
WON LINYSd Gl dAWS
O10 rE
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
9010-6
BOLO 6
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-t6
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
910-10 66
€90-01-
€90°01-
€90-01-
SPO Ol-
€90-01-
€90°01
SbO-Ol-
910 10-6
ShO-O1-16
SO 01-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO-O1-46
SrO-O1-16
910-10 r6
Oo rE
SPO-O1-16
GPO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
GPO-O1-16
SpO-O1-16
SbOO1-16
O10 re
910106
9LO1O re
SbO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SPO-OL-16
SPO-O1-16
910106
91010 r6
SbOO1-16
ShO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
9010 F6
ShOOL-16
SbO-O1-16
SpO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SrO-O1-16
90106
9101066
SbO-O1-16
SrO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SbO-01-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO O1-16
Spo Ol-16
SPO O1-16
SPO-OL-16
SbO-01-16
oozzoz¥zzog zzzogzzzz00z0zz
LlE91
6r ol
blp ol
SP OL
OPP OL
brol
82r 91
dp gt
pol
IS 9L
6Lb 94
ZF 91
6rr Ol
chp ob
terol
rol
69h OL
9p OL
6hr OL
Shp ol
ver ob
b6r 91
22S 9l
2S 9
1S 9h
ger ol
8P ol
Sop 91
Sep ot
er 9
LIS OL
60S 91
Sol
6r 91
Spot
88P 91
eer ol
SOS 91
966 91
b6p Ot
62h 91
69p 91
pop OL
l6p 91
v6p 91
r6r 91
sor
Sp Ot
6bp Ol
lbp ot
bisgot
6p 91
6Sp 91
BSP 91
9Sb OL
Sp ol
26p 9t
20S 91
909 91
So
9Zb OL
\9r 9b
d6r 91
bor OL
sol
cep OL
6Lp 91
Sop OL
SOS 91
6h 91
6b Ot
elb ol
b9p Ot
bos ot
S6P 91
Lip ot
Slp ot
G6/Lb/b4
S6/Lb/14
SE/LU/NA
S6/LN/L4
SB/Lb/bA
S6/LI/LN
SE/Lb/bN
S6/OL/th
S6AI/IL
S6I/Ih
SEALE
S6AI/tE
S6AI/IS
S6/OI/th
S6/I/tE
S6/SI/bh
S6/PI/Lh
SEP /th
S6/PI/LE
S6/P L/L
S6/PI/LE
SEEN
S6EL/LL
S6EN/LE
SEEL/bL
SBEN/LL
S6AL/IL
S6fEL/tE
S6EN/Ih
G6/EA/UA
S6/LI/EE
S6/EL/LE
SE/EN/EE
S6/LV/UL
S6/EA/LE
S6/O1/Lh
S6/O1/th
S6/Ob/th
S6/O1/14
S6/OL/tE
G6/OI/LL
S6/ON/th
S6/O1/bh
S6/60/11
S6/60/11
S6/60/11
S6/60/41
S6/6O/14
S6/60/t1
S6/60/11
S6/RO/11
S6/B0/11
S6/B0/14
S6/B0/L1
S6/B0/11
S6/RO/Lh
S6/LO/LL
S6/LO/LE
S6/LO/LA
S6/LO/t1
S6/LO/LE
S6/LO/b1
S6/0/11
S6/90/11
S6/90/t1
S6AO/IL
S6A0/11
S6A0/11
S6/SO/IL
S6/SO/h1
S6/SO/b I
S6/SO/11
S6/SO/L I
S6/bO/LE
S6/0/11
S6/vO/b 1
S6/PO/1 1
10 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANVHL
419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NVHL
19 ‘NOGNO1 M3N ? NOLOHD 'W3AIY SSNWHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOUD ‘H3AIY S3NVHL
19 'NOQNO7 M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD ‘H3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SSNWHL
10 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘'H3AIH SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYDS 'H3AIN SSNWHL
49 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘'H3AIH S3NWHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUYD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
49 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD ‘H3AIY SSAWHL
419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIH SSWWHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIN SSNWHL
49 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWWHL
419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIY SSNWHL
19 ‘NOGNO1M3N 2 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SANVHL
19 'NOLOHO 'H3AIN S3WVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIN SANVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N-3 NOLOYD 'H3AIY S3NVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'H3AIy S3NVHL
419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY S3NVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIN S3WVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOWD 'H3AIN S3NVHL
19 'NOLOUDS 'H3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘W3AIY S3NVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
10 ‘NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘H3AIY S3WVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIN SANVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH S3AVHL
19 'NOLOUD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOLOUD ‘H3AIH SSNWHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN S3WVHL
10 'NOGNO7M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SAWVHL
419 'NOONO7MAN 8 NOLOYD ‘'Y3AIY SSNWHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'W3AIY SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SAWVHL
19 'NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSNWHL
19 'NOLOHD 'H3AIN SAWNVHL
19 'NOLOYD 'U3AIY SSWWHL
19 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
419 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'W3AIY SANVHL
40 ‘NOONO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'W3AIY SAWVHL
419 'NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
49 ‘NOLOHD 'U3AIY SSWVHL
419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSWNVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY SAWWHL
10 'NOGNO17M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIN S3WVHL
419 'NOLOUD 'Y3AId SSWVHL
19 ‘NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSWNVHL
419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIH S3WWHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO17 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN S3NVHL
10 'NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SANVHL
10 'NOLOUD 'N3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 9 NOLOYD 'H3AIN SSWVHL
410 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYD ‘H3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL
40 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'U3AIN SANVHL
19 'NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SSWVHL
419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY S3WVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N ? NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOGNO7 MAN ? NOLOHD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N ? NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 3 NOLOUD 'H3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOONO1M3N 3 NOLOYD ‘Y3AIY S3NVHL
Lb ald
ATOMV3S -
STOMVSS -
SYOMV3S -
SYOMV3S
STOMV3S
SIOMVAS -
2) ald
2) Wald -
ATOMV3S
AS TOMVAS
JYOMV3S
STOMV3S
AYOMV3S
STOMVW3S -
STOMVAS
ATOMV3S
JTOMV3S
ATOMV3S
STOMVAS ~
AIOMVAS -
LL YAld -
ATOMV3S
JTOMV3S
ATOMV3S -
SIOMVIS -
STOMV3S
AS TOMV3S
ATOMV3S
Zt YAld -
A TOMVAS
ATOMV3S -
ATOMV3S
STOMVAS -
STOMVWAS -
Zt b3ld
Lb Y3ld -
ATOMVWAS -
ATOMVSS
AIOMV3S
ATOMVAS -
STOMV3S -
ATOMVAS -
Li Wald -
2) 3ld-
dt Y3ld-
ATOMVSS -
ATOMVAS -
A TOMVAS -
SIOMVAS
Lt Yald
Li YAld -
STOMVSS *
STOMVAS -
AYOMV3S
ATOMV3S -
Zt Y3ld-
ATOMVSS
SIOMV3S
ATOMVSS *
SIOMV3S -
ATOMVSS
Zt Wald -
Lt Y3ld -
STOMVAS -
ATOMVSS -
A OMVWAS -
STOMV SS -
STOMV3S -
ATOMVS3S -
ATOMV SS -
STOMVSS *
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d 350
ATOMVWAS - AAYN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
XAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d3G0
AAVN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAVN/1d30,
AAWN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAVN/1d30,
AAVN/1d3aG
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d3G0
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAVN/1d30,
AAVN/1d30,
AAWN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30,
AAVN/1d3G
AAWN/1d30
ANWN/1d30,
AAVN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAVN/1d30,
AAVN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAVN/1d350
MAVN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
AMWN/1d30
AAWN/Ld30
AAVN/1d30
AAWN/1d50
AAWN/1d3G
AAVN/1d30
AAVN/Ld30
AAWN/1d 350
AAWN/1d30
AWN/1d30
AAVN/1d3G
AAVN/1d30,
AAWN/1d30,
AAWN/1d30
AAYN/1d30
AAVN/1d30
AAVN/1d3aG,
AAVYN/1d30
AAWN/1d30
6S610r661
80002661
€B000Z661
EB000Z66t
80007661
€B000z661
8000661
6S610r661
6S610r661
80007661
€8000Z661
80002661
€80002661
€8000z661
80007661
80002661
ee000z66+
80002661
€8000¢661
ee000z66!
80002661
6S610r661
€B0002661
€80002661
80002661
B000ZE61
©80002661
80002661
€80002661
6S610r661
€80002661
€80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
6S610r661
6S610r661
€80002661
80002661
€8000Z661
80002661
©B000Z661
80002661
6S610r66)
6S610P661
6S6L0r661
B000Z661
€80002661
€80002661
€e000z661
65610661
6S610r661
B000Z661
€80002661
80002661
€80002661
6S610r661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
6S610r661
6S610P661
80007661
80007661
€8000z661
80002661
80002661
90002661
80002661
80002661
80002665
80002661
80002661
80002661
8000665
€90-01-16
€30° 01-16
€90-01-16
£90-01-16
€90-01-16
910 tO rs
910-106
€90-01-16
910-10 r6
910 10-6
€90°01-16
91010 r6
910 10-6
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
81010 re
910 10-66
SbO-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
91010 F6
9O1O re
SbOO1-16
SpO-O1-16
SPO 01-16
S¥O- 01-56
SrO-O1-16
SO 01-16
910106
SPO O1-16
SPO O1-16
SpO-Ol-16
SPO O1-16
SPO OL-N6
SPO-O1-16
SPO 01-16
SrO 01-16
SpO- 01-16
SPO O1-16
910 10-66
S10 10-6
SPO-O1-16
SPO O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SbOO1-16
SPO OL-16
910 10-6
910-1066
SPO-O1-16
SpO-O1-16
€90-01-16
SPO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SPO-OL-16
910 10-6
910° 10-66
€90-01-16
90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
0012
6S 91
6lp 91
Llp ot
epor
vip OL
9Sr ol
9Spol
frp ol
dpor
BSP OL
Sep ot
BSP OL
Sr ol
e6y Ol
88r OL
Spot
dpor
9Sp SL
905 91
avon
SboL
pyoL
dbo
Sp Ol
60S 91
66 Ot
6p 91
SBP Ot
QP 91
Ble ol
Sb Ot
bigot
80S 9
66h 91
66h 91
6p 91
bp oh
sis got
SISoh
€0S 91
SSp OL
db 9oL
8Sb OL
tis ol
l6p 91
GLb OL
89b OL
esp Ot
Shp OL
8Sb OL
66r OL
66p 9b
Sep ol
cop 9b
Sp 91
deo.
bop 91
6p 91
tZp 9b
99b 91
99P OL
Lop 91
edb ol
ivory
6h 91
cer ot
L991
SOP OL
eSp Ot
Sbp Ol
dp oO.
9SP OL
Sor
S6p 91
6r 91
Sip ot
bre ot
S6feo/el
s6/eoreh
S6/cOrel
s6/eo/el
sé/co/el
S6/OE/tb
SBE
6/62/11
S6/ee/tt
sereett
sereztt
S6/L2/Lb
S6ILZ/b
S6/LE/LL
S6/L/b
S6/L/tt
S6/ez/ih
see
S692 th
seoztt
serait
seeett
SErSe/bt
S6/S2bh
S6/SZ/tb
S6/SZ/bt
S6/se/t tb
SE/S2/t
S6/Se/tt
S6/Se/bh
S6/re/h 4
S6me/b
S6/Pe/b
S6/PO/bb
S6reeht
S6/Pe/th
S6/Pe/t 4
S6EC/tL
SEEC/II
SEE
sefeeth
S6/ee/tb
S6/e2/i4
S6/eesth
S6/ee/bb
S6/ee/bb
S6/ee/th
S6/CC/tL
S6/ee/th
SE/besbh
SE/KE/E
S6/LZ/EL
SE/be/b
S6/LC/LS
SE/b2/bb
SE/02/ tt
S6/0Z/tt
S6/02/tt
S6/02/ bh
S6/02/bt
S6/02/tb
S6/0Z/ tb
S6BI/IE
S6/BI/tb
SEE I/LL
S6/BI/tb
S6/6N/b
S6/6I/bb
G6/6E/bb
SE/BL/LE
SBI
Seats
S6/at/Lt
S6/Ob/tb
S6/BI/bE
S6Al/ih
SEAL
419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
419 ‘NOGNO1 M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSWVHL
49 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
419 ‘NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWVHL
410 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD '3AIY SSWVHL
410 ‘NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSWVHL
419 'NOLOUD 'U3AIY SANVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIN SSNVHL
49 'NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVHL
410 'NOLOHD 'H3AId SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
10 'NOGNO17M3N 3 NOLOHD ‘H3AIH SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO7 MAN 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SANVHL
19 'NOLOWD 'H3AIU S3NVHL
19 'NOLOUD 'W3AIN SANVHL
19 'NOGNO17 M3N 3 NOLOWD ‘H3AIN SSWWHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIY S3SNWHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOWD ‘Y3AIH SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
19 'NOLOUD ‘W3AIN S3NVHL
19 'NOLOHD 'H3AId SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOUD 'H3AIN S3SWVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIY SANVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘H3AIY SSWVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘H3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNWHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHO 'H3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOONO1M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIY SSNVHL
410 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY S3NVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVH1L
19 'NOONO7 MAN 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SAWVHL
190 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIH SSWWHL
19 'NOGNOT M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AI4 SSWVHL
19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOLOYD 'Y3AIY S3SNVHL
19 'NOLOYD 'H3AIY S3WNVHI
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AI¥ SSWWHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIN SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSWWHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYO 'H3AIN SSAWHL
419 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWVHL
19 'NOLOHO 'H3AIY SSWWHL
LO 'NOGNO7M3N 3 NOLOYD ‘USAIN S3NVHL
19 ‘NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIN SSNVHL
419 ‘NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘H3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AId SANVHL
419 'NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIH SSWWHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
419 'NOGNO7 M3N # NOLOHD 'H3AIH SAWVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL
410 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVH1
19 'NOLOUD 'W3AIY SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIN SSNVWHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'W3AIN SANVHL
10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIN S3SNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
40 'NOLOUD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
410 'NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AI¥ SSNWHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL
19 'NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIN S3WWHL
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d3G
STIOMVSS - AAVNW/1d30
STOMVWSS - AAWN/1d30
2) Y3ld - AAWN/1d30
21 W3ld - AAWN/1d30
SIOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
2) Wald - AAVN/1d30,
21 W3ld - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
Zt Y3ld - AAVN/1d30
Zt Y3Id - AAWN/1da0
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMWAS - AAVN/1d30
Zt Wald - AAWN/1d30
21 W3ld - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
Zt 3d - AAVN/1d30
Zt W3ld - AAVN/1d3G
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS = AAVN/1d35G
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d350
STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
Zt H3ld - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVSS - AAVN/1d350
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVW3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS > AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS > AAVN/1d350
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
2b Ald - AAVN/1d30
2) Y3Id - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMWAS - AAWN/1d350
SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
dt W3ld - AAVN/1d30
ATIOMVSS - AAWN/1d30
A TOMV AS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
Zt ald - AAVNW/1d30
Zt Wald - AAWW/1d30
STOMVIS - AAVN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d350
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
SOMVAS - AAWN/1d350
Lt Ald - AAVNW/1d30
2) Y3ld - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS > AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS * AAVN/1d350
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d350
2) Y3ld - AAVN/1d30
2) W3ld - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMW3S - AAWN/1d30
JIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
JTOMV SS - AAVN/1d3a0
€B000Z661
€80002661
80007661
80007661
80002661
6S610r661
6S610r661
€80002661
6S610r661
6S610r661
€B000z661
6S610r661
6S6L0r661
€80002661
80007661
80002661
6S610r661
6S610r661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
EB000Z661
6S610r661
6S61L0r661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
6S610r661
80002661
€80002661
€80002661
€80002661
EB000Z66!
€80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
6S610r66!
6S610r661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
80007661
6S610r661
€B000Z661
e©8000z66t
80002661
80007661
80002661
6S610r661
6S610r66!
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
6S610r661
6S610r661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€B000Z661
©80002661
80002661
6S610r661
6S6 1066)
80002661
80002661
80002661
€B000Z661
€e000c661
XAYN SN)
AAYN S11)
AAYN SN)
AVN'S 1)
AAYN SN)
AAVWN SN)
AYN SN)
AAYN SN)
AAYN SN)
AAVN SN}
AAYN SN}
AAVN SN)
AAYN SN)
AVN SN
MYN SN
AVN SN)
AAWN SN!
AAYN SN)
AAVN SN)
AAVN S/N)
AAYN SN)
AAYN SN)
AAYN SN)
AVN SN)
XAYN SN)
AAYN SN)
AAYN SN
AYN SN)
AWN SN
AYN SN)
AAWN SN)
AAYN SN
AAYN SN)
AYN SN)
AVN SN
AAVN SN)
AAYN SN
AVN SN)
AAYN SN)
AYN SN
AAVN SN)
MAYN SN)
AAVN SN
AAYN SN
AAYN SN
MAYN SN
AYN SN
AYN SN)
AYN SN
AAWN SN)
AAYN SN)
MAYN SN
AYN SN)
AYN SN
AAYN SN)
AAYN SN)
MYN SN
AYN SN
AYN SN
AAWN SN)
AYN SN)
MVN SN)
AYN SN
AAYN SN)
AAVN SN)
AAYN S11)
AAYN SN)
AAYN SN)
AAYN SN)
MAVN SN
AAYN SN
AYN SN
AVN SN
AWN SN)
AAVN SN)
AAYN SN)
AAYN SN
SPOOL-16
SbhO-O1-16
GPO-Ol-l6
GbO-O1-16
SPO O1-16
SPO 01-16
SPO-O1-16
ShO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
Sho 01-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO-01-16
SPO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SpO-O1-16
SPO-OL-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
SPO-O1-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90'01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90°0t-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€9001-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-10
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-'01-16
SPOOL 16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
£90 01-16
GbO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SbO-01-16
SPO-O1-t6
SrO-01-16
SPO 01-16
SbO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SPO O1-16
SbO-OL-16
SPO O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SPO O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SbO'O1-16
SbO-OL-16
SbO 01-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
ShO-O1-16
SPO-01-16
GbO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
€90-°01-16
ro)
o
nN
2°
ie)
oo)
BIS OL
dis 9t
pis ol
Oro
lesan
Bisel
SOS Ot
48y 91
€9p 91
Sp OL
pro
825 Ob
esor
L6y 91
ergot
69p 91
9p 91
Sp ol
ebb ot
pS Ol
ego
BISOL
eis ot
ISO}
60S 91
80S 91
SSb ol
ves al
825 91
92S 91
22S 9
905 91
L9b 9b
9p 91
dis aot
94p 91
9p ot
Orr OL
tps ot
ego
PISOL
his 9b
€Lp ol
Sep ot
esol
sol
6Zy 91
vp ot
6rS 91
iS9L
GLP OL
9Sb 91
BOS 91
966 91
6p Ol
99P OF
ver ol
dep or
eISaL
Zisgot
9Isgol
£05 91
68b 91
9p 91
esol
68b OL
bes ot
405 91
bisel
Lis ot
ses ol
per gol
99p 91
tos 91
Zig gob
bos ot
6p 91
S6el/eh
S661 /eh
S6fel/e
S6/61/2h
S62
seaie
S6el/el
serait
serai/et
serei/et
S6/at/eh
S6/Lb/24
S6/LI/2
S6/LI/eL
S6/LI/e4
S6/LL/Zh
S6/LI/2h
S6/Lb/2h
G6/LI/eh
Ss6Al/el
S6Al/el
S6/9I/el
S6I/el
S6Al/el
S6/I/el
S6aiiet
seie
S6/Si/el
S6/Si/eh
S6/Sh/el
G6/SI/el
S6si/el
S6/SI/2h
S6/SI/2h
S6/Pi/eh
S6/PI/21
S6/Ph/eh
S6/Pb/eb
s6et/el
S6et/et
S6I/e1
S6EI/e1
S6fEl/eb
S6fEL/eL
S6/el/el
S6/el/eL
S6/et/el
S6/eN/eh
SE/L Ab
S6/tb/eb
Gest i/eh
G6/L Lie
S6/O1/eh
S6/01/eh
S6/O1/21
S6/O1/2L
S6/ol/eb
S6/Ol/et
S6/60/21
S6/60/21
S6/60/21
S6/60/21
S601
S6/60/21
semoet
seeo/zl
S6/L0/21
S6/L/21
S6/0/21
S6/90/21
S6/SO/21
S6/sO/et
S6/SO/21
S6/rO/eb
S6EOeL
S6EO/Ct
S6EO/21
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SANVHL
19 'NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIY S3NVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 9 NOLOYD 'H3AIY S3NVHL
19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOYO 'Y3AIY SANVHL
10 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIY SSNVHL
19 ‘NOGNO1M3N 9 NOLOHD 'H3AIH S3NWHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIH SSWVHL
10 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOUD 'Y3AIH SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSWVHL
419 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOYD ‘Y3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOWD ‘Y3AIY SANWHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘W3AIH SSWVHL
10 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH S3WNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N ® NOLOUD ‘H3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIH S3NWHL
419 'NOGNO1 MN ? NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOONO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘Y3AIY SAWVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
40 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSWVHL
10 'NOGNO7M3N 2 NOLOWD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SANWHL
19 'NOONO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'W3AIY SANVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIH SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIN S3WVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOUD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
10 'NOQNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'H3AIY SSWNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘Y3AIH SAWVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SAWNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIY SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYO 'H3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N ® NOLOHD ‘Y3AIH SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO1 M3N ® NOLOHD ‘Y3AIY S3NVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIH S3WVHL
49 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'U3AIN SSNVHL
49 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO7M3N ® NOLOYD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
410 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIH SSANVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIU SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOYD ‘Y3AIH S3NVHL
19 ‘NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SSNWHL
410 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL
410 'NOONO1M3N 3 NOLOWS 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIY SSWWHL
19 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOWD 'W3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOONO7M3N 8 NOLOYD ‘H3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOWO ‘H3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AId SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD ‘H3AIY SSAWHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSWWHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 9 NOLOYD 'H3AIH SSNWHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
410 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIN SSWVHL
419 'NOONO1M3N 3 NOLOHO 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 MAN ® NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSNVHL
10 'NOGNO1M3N ? NOLOYD 'H3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N # NOLOUD 'H3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHO 'H3AIY SANVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOHD '3AIY S3WVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N ® NOLOHD 'H3AIN S3NVHL
10 'NOGNO7M3N 8 NOLOHD 'H3AIH SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 9 NOLOWDO 'H3AIY SSNVHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N ? NOLOUD 'Y3AIH SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO17 M3N 8 NOLO 'H3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 9 NOLOHDO ‘Y3AId SSWVHL
10 'NOGNO7 MAN 8 NOLOHD ‘Y3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOGNOTM3N ? NOLOHD ‘Y3AIN SSWVHL
19 ‘NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'H3AIN SSWVHL
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVS3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMV IS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3IS - AAVN/1d30.
ATOMWSS - AAVN/1d30
STIOMVAS - AAVNW/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMV 3S - AAWN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d350
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AIOMVSS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVW3S - AAWN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
JSTOMV AS - AAVN/1d30
STIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AS TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMWAS - AAWVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS © AAWN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G
STOMVWSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVA3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
A TOMVSS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d50
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMWAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV AS - AAVN/1d30
STOMWAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
80002661
80002661
80002661
Ee000z66!
Ee000z661
80002661
B000Z661
e8000z661
€80002661
80002661
800066 +
€80002661
800066!
8000661
e000c661
€8000Z661
80002661
80002661
80002661
e8000z661
E8000Z661
€B000Z661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
8000661
80002661
€e0002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
€8000z661
80002661
€80002661
80007661
£80002661
80002661
€B0002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
©80002661
80002661
8000266)
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
e0002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
€B0002661
€e000z661
80002661
80002661
80007661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
€e000zs6t
EB000ZEEE
80002661
€80002661
80002661
sscel
eszet
zszel
eszel
Opzel
Gpzel
oszel
tSZeL
Lpzer
8reel
6rzeL
Pree
epceb
epzel
bezel
Oveel
LEzEL
BEceL
6ecet
vecel
secel
gece
cece
eecel
bezet
Oecel
62zeb
S2ze
pezel
Lezer
9eceL
eezet
8eceh
eezeb
bezel
ozzer
61ces
eze
vizel
OIzet
SizeL
e1zer
Lyzer
eicel
e0zet
OLcel
Lizen
60ze1
POZE
90ZEb
sozel
LOZEL
e0zeh
20zel
Lozeb
ooze
B6LEL
661e1
veLet
S6LEL
ZBLEL
Esler
OBLEL
delet
O6tel
(6leb
6eler
BBIel
deer
OBlel
cele
vale
SOLES
ecteb
iren
2e1eh
OzLet
SPO O1-16
SPOOl-t6
SbO-O1-16
SPO OL-16
SPO O1-t6
SPO O1-16
SPO O1-16
SrO-O1-16
SpO-O1-16
SpO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SpO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SbO 01-16
SbO-O1-16
SPO OL-16
SrO-O1-16
SpOol-lé6
SPO 01-16
ShO-O1-I+;
SbO-O1-16
SbO-01-16
S¥O-O1-16
SPO-01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
SPO O1-16
Spo olla
£90 01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
90-01-16
90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90° 01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
£90 01-16
9001-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90 01-16
€90- 01-16
€90° 01-16
€90° 01-16
€90°01-16
SPOOL 16
€90-01-16
SbO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SPO-OL-16
SPO-O1-16
SbOOL-16
SvO-O1-16
SPO O1-16
SPOO1-16
SbO-O1-16
SPO-01-16
Sbl
Shh
o
ny
o-oco000000000
So
re)
001
Ose
0L2
0S2
0S2
052
0Se
,0S2
0S
dbp ot
OPS OF
€ps ob
SOL
tes or
pos ol
92b OL
lop ob
6pr OL
hep or
2p 91
ero
B80 91
8S OL
SOL
Lis gb
6LP 91
tSh 9b
SSO
bps ob
BiSoL
OS 91
pSb OL
80r 91
ves ot
PIS OL
9lb ol
Or 9
Eb 91
ber ob
6tb OL
86h 91
Z9b Ob
BPs ol
zeg ot
62S 91
eso
bSp ot
€0€ Of
9Lp Ot
Spo
ep ol
evo
82r OL
L8E 91
82S 9
20S 91
tos 91
88r 91
BIS9oL
805 91
gol
So
9Er OF
lbp ob
zlp ob
Orr ol
62h 91
6er ob
bey OL
t2p ob
Ops OL
ves OL
9€S 91
ees ot
ego
eisol
0S 91
29b OL
les or
80S OL
v6P Ot
€Sp 91
verb OL
ees ol
92S 9b
beg ob
96/S0/10
96/0/10
96/0/10)
96/0/10
96/60/10
96/0/10
96/E0/10
96/60/10
96/60/10
96/60/10
96/60/10
96/60/10
96/60/10
96/20/10
96/20/10
96/20/10
96/20/10
96/20/10
96/0/10
96/10/10
96/10/10
96/10/10
96/10/10}
96/10/10}
S6/LE/2h
S6/Le/eh
S6/LE/Z
S6/LE/2h
S6/LE/21
S6/LE/eh
S6/LE/eh
S6/0E/2
S6/0E/21
S6/ee/el
S6/62/21
S6/62/e1
S6/6e/e1
S6/62/e1
s6/6e/eh
s6eeel
seeeel
s6Ree/el
S6/eeel
s6raeet
s6fee/el
S6/Le/eh
S6/Le/eh
S6/Le/eh
S6/L2/eh
s6ae/el
s6neel
see
s6Meel
s6eel
seneel
Sé/Se/el
s6/seel
s6/s2el
S6/seel
s6/seel
S6/S2/21
SB/p2/eh
SB/pe/el
S6/re/el
S6/reel
S6/re/el
S6/Pe/eh
S6/Pe/eh
S6Ee/e1
Se/teyel
SE/Le/eh
s6/0z/e
s6/0z/eh
S6/0e/el
S6/6I/eh
S6/6I/e1
S6/61/2h
U3AIN SSNVHL
19 NOONO1M&N 2 NOLOHD Lv Y3AIY SANVHL
10 NOGNO7 M3N ? NOLOUD LV H3AIY SSWVHL
419 NOGNO1 M3N ? NOLOHD Ly Y3AIY SSNVHL
40 NOGNOTM3N 3 NOLOHD LV Y3AIY S3NVHL
410 NOGNO1 MSN ? NOLOHD LV U3AIY SSNVHL
19 NOGNO7 M3N 2 NOLOHD Lv H3AIN SSNVHL
19 NOGNO7 M4N 8 NOLOUD LV H3AIN SSAVHL
19 NOGNO7 M3N 2 NOLOUD LV Y3AIY SSNVHL
49 NOGNO1 M3N 3 NOLOHD LV Y3AIY SSNVHL
49 NOGNO1 M3N 3 NOLOUD LY Y3AIY SANVHL
19 NOGNO7 M3N 3 NOLOHD LV H3AIY SSWVHL
19 NOGNO1 MAN 3 NOLOUD Lv H3AIY SANVHL
419 ‘NOLOYD 8 NOONO7 M3N 'H3AIY SSWWHL
19 'NOLOYD 3 NOGNO7 MSN 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
19 NOONO1M3N 2 NOLOYDS LV Y3AIN SAWWHL
19 NOGNO71 M3N 8 NOLOHD LV Y3AIN SSWVHL
19 NOGNO7 MAN 2 NOLOYS LV H3AIN SSNVWHL
419 'NOLOYD 2 NOGNOT M3N 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
410 ‘NOLOYS 3 NOGNOTM23N ‘Y3AIH SSWWHL
410 ‘NOLOUD 8 NOGNO7 M3N 'Y3AIY S3WVHL
10 'NOLOYD 8 NOGNOTM&N ‘H3AIY SSNVHL
419 'NOLOYD 8 NOGNO7 M3N ‘Y3AIy SSNVHL
10 'NOLOYD 3 NOONO7 MAN ‘'Y3AIY SAWNVWHL
19 NOLOYD 8 NOGNO7 M3N 'Y3AIY SANVHL
19 NOLOYD 3 NOGNOTM3N ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 NOLOUD 8 NOGNO7 M3N 'Y3AIY S3NVHL
19 NOLOYO 8 NOGNOT M3N 'H3AIY SSNVHL
19 NOLOYD 2 NOONO1 M3N 'Y3AIY SANVHL
19 NOLOHD 8 NOGNOT M3N '83AIY SSWVHL
19 NOLOYD 2 NOGNO1 M3N ‘Y3AId SSWVHL
19 NOLOUD 8 NOGNOT M3N 'H3AIY SSWVHL
10. NOLOYS 8 NOGNO7M3N ‘Y3AIY S3NVHL
19 NOLOHD 8 NOGNO1 M3N ‘Y3AIH SAWNVHL
19 NOLOHD 8 NOGNO7 M3N ‘83AIW SSNVHL
19 NOLOYD 2 NOGNO7 M3N 'Y3AIY SANVHL
19 NOLOYD 2 NOONO7 M3N '83AIY SSNVHL
10 NOLOWS 3 NOONO7 M3N ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 NOLOYS 8 NOGNOT M3N 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 NOLOWD 2 NOGNOT MSN 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
10 NOLOHS 8 NOGNOTM3N ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL
10 NOLOWD 8 NOGNO1 MSN 'Y3AIY SSWWHL
19 NOLOHD 8 NOGNOT M3N 'W3AIH SSWVHL
10 NOLOYD 3 NOGNO7 M3N ‘Y3AiY SSNVHL
419 NOLOWD 3 NOGNOT MSN 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 NOLOYD 8 NOONO1M3N 'Y3AIN SANVHL
410 NOLOWD 8 NOONOT M3N 'Y3AIY SANVHL
10 NOLOYD 8 NOGNO7 M3N ‘Y3AIY SANVHL
419 NOLOWD 3 NOONO7 MSN ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL
419 NOLOHD 8 NOGNOT M3N ‘USAIN SANVHL
19 NOLOYD 8 NOGNOT M3N ‘Y3AIY SSWVHL
19 NOLOYD 2? NOGNOT MSN ‘Y3AIY SSWWHL
419 NOLOYD 3 NOGNO1 MAN ‘Y3AIY SSWVHL
19 NOLOUD 2 NOGNOTM3N 'W3AId SSNVHL
19 ‘NOGNO1 M3N 2 NOLOYD 'Y3AIY S3WVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD 'W3AIN SSWVHL
10 'NOGNO7 M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIH SANVHL
40 ‘NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOYD ‘83AIY SAWVHL
19 ‘'NOGNO71M3N 3 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SSWVHL
49 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOUD ‘Y3AIY SSNVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
410 'NOGNO1 M3N 3 NOLOUO 'Y3AIY S3NVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N ? NOLOWD 'H3AIN SSWVHL
10 'NOGNO1 M3N 9 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
410 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHO 'Y3AIY SSNVHL
49 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NVHL
10 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOUDS 'H3/AIY S3WVHL
410 'NOGNO17M3N 8 NOLOYD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
410 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 2 NOLOYD 'Y3AIN SSNVHL
19 'NOONO1M3N ® NOLOWD ‘H3AIH S3AVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'U3AIH SANVHL
19 'NOGNO7 M3N 8 NOLOUD 'Y3AIY SANVHL
19 'NOGNO1M3N 3 NOLOHD 'Y3AIW SAWVHL
190 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVWHL
419 'NOGNO1M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
419 'NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOHD 'Y3AIY S3NVHL
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVWSS - AAVN/1da0
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
SIOMW3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AJTOMVWSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
JTOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVNW/1d3G
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMWAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
JIOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d 50
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVI/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d350
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVWSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAWN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVWAS > AAWN/1da0
AIOMWAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS = AAVN/1d350
STOMVAS - AAVNW/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
JTOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS * AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G0
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G
STOMVAS » AAVN/1d30
SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
AIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d350
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMWAS - AAVN/1d30
EB000ZE6!
€8000z66!
80002661
80002661
80002661
80007661
Ee000z661
80002661
80002661
B000Z661
80002661
€8000z661
EB000Z661
8000266!
€80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
800066)
€B000Z661
B000Z66t
80002661
80002661
©8000766!
€80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€8000z66!
80002661
€8000Z661
80002661
8000266!
€e000Z661
80002661
©e000z661
€e000z661
€e000z66+
€B000z661
80002661
80002661
8000266!
80002661
80002661
E€B000Z661
80002661
80002661
B000z661
€B000Z661
EBO00ZE6!
80002661
80002661
80007661
80002661
©8000266'
€B0002661
B000266)
EB000Z661
e€8000z66!
80002661
€B000Z661
80002661
80002661
80002661
B0002661
€e000z661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
B000z661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
SrO-O1-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
SpO-01-16
SPO O1-16
SPO O1-16
SpOOl-16
€90- 01-16
SPO O1-16
€90-01-16
SPO-O1-16
€90-01-16
SbO-O1-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
SPO O1-16
SpO-01-16
SrO-01-16
€90°-01-16
SPO 01-16
€90-01-16
SPO-O1-16
€90-01-16
€90- 01-16
SPO O1-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90° 01-16
€90°01-16
€90- 01-16
€90°01-16
SpO-O1-16
SPO 01-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO 01-16
€90-01-16
SrO-O1-16
SPO-01-16
SPO-O1-16
Sho 01-16
SPO 01-16
SPO O1-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90° 01-16
€90 01-16
€90-01-16
SpO-01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90° 01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
£90°01-16
€90-O1-16
SPO-01-16
SPO O1-1E
SPO-01-16
SbO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO O1-16
SPO 01-16
SbO-O1-16
SpO-O1-16
Shh
Sb
Shb
SPL
Shh
SPL
SPL
Shh
ShL
SPL
6r
686
er
sor
Srey
798 F
Pla b
bol bp
68>
esl
206 b
fol b
I6p
808 b
68
685
868 b
606 »
806 >
Obl b
806 b
968 b
S06 b
SSO 'b
£08 6
868 >
Leey
ese >
668
blly
206 9
906°
OL PF
468 >
cle b
6S8'b
668 >
98 Fy
828 b
Silv
tee ph
Sle
606 b
€slb
€06 b
106 b
“glo
oP
498 F
S06 b
LSt
eee
688 b
906 b
Bile
206 b
rea b
968 >
S68 b
lL ¢
ee b
ebb
dsl
S08'P
658 b
198
988 F
68h
6+
668 F
$06 b
t6a>
208 6
9s8 y
bil b
Sle
selp
Ser ot
ep ot
evo
eyot
pip ot
@rsoL
ers or
6eS OL
eg or
£05 9
Spool
dbpor
6€r OL
ey ol
poL
6e 91
bes ot
gtsaol
905 OF
86h 91
Zp ob
dsp 9b
9Sb OL
€2p OL
bbe OL
86E 91
dest
ves 91
ees ol
lesan
86h 9
8b 91
Ppp OL
PEP OL
6ep Ot
bop Ob
69€ 91
6rS 91
dvs gt
eps ot
BES 91
elsor
20S OL
86> 91
9SP Ot
Ser ol
evga
€2p or
cp or
6lp el
psa
€ps gol
ces ot
BiSoL
OS 91
es 9b
96r 91
4Op 91
cep ob
OPS OL
625 04
46> 91
ep ot
tp on
SOP ot
sesol
6IS9L
ersor
€0p 91
“lb 9t
esp ol
cep OL
depot
2p ot
eps or
2uS ob
sep 9oL
Sid
96/L1/10
96/L1/10
86/L1/10)
96/L1/10
96/L1/40
96/91/10
96/91/10
96/91/10
96/91/10)
96/91/10)
96/91/10
96/91/10
96/91/10
96/91/10
96/91/10
9691/10
96/S1/10)
96/51/10
96/51/10
96/S1/10
96/51/10
96/51/10
96/51/10
86/51/10
96/S1/10)
96/51/10)
96/F1/10)
96/r1/10
96/r 1/10
96/h 1/10
96/h 1/10
96/r 1/10}
96/F 1/10)
96/> 1/10)
96/F 1/10)
96/P 1/10)
Q6/b 1/10
96/01/40
96/E1/10
96/61/10)
96/E1/10
96/E1/10
96/61/10
96/61/10
96/1/10)
96/E1/10
96/61/10)
96/1/10)
96/61/10)
96/01/10)
86/21/10
96/21/10
96/21/10}
96/21/40}
96/21/40)
96/14/10)
96/14/10
96/11/10)
96/01/10
96/60/10
96/60/10
96/60/10
96/60/10
96/60/10
96/60/10
96/80/10
96/20/10)
96/20/40)
96/20/40)
96/90/10)
96/90/10;
96/90/10)
96/90/10)
96/90/10}
96/90/10)
96/50/10
96/50/10}
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3Ald SSNVHL
Y3AIu SSWVHL
Y3AId SSNWHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIN SANVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
W3AId SSWVHL
SAIN SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSWVWHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIH SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSWVWHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SANVHL
Y3AIN SSANVHL
Y3AIH S3WVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIY S3WVHL
Y3AIH SANWHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AId SSNWHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWWHL
Y3AIN S3WWHL
Y3AIW SANVHL
Y3AIN SSWVWHL
YSAIW SSWWHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
USAIN SANVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIW SSWWHL
Y3AIW SSNWHL
Y3AIy SSWWHL
Y3Ald SSWWHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SAWVHL
Y3AIy SSWVHL
YSAlY SSWVHL
SAIN SSAVWHL
Y3AIH SSWWHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIY SANVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIY SANVHL
Y3AIN SSNWHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SAWWHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIH SANVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVWHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHI
Y3AIY S3WVHL
Y3AIN SANVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIW SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIy SSNVWHL
Y3AIN SANVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AI SANVHL
Y3AIY SSWNVHL
Y3AIY SANVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
419 NOGNO1 M3N 8 NOLOYS LV Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIb SSNWHL
Y3AI¥ SSWVHL
ATOMV3S - AAVN/Ld30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d350
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVA]S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d50
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVIS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d3G
JTOMVIS - AAVN/1d3G
STOMVS3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATIOMVSS - AAVNW/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d350
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVIS - AAVN/1d3G0
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
J TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVNW/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS * AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/Ld30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMWAS - AAWN/1d3d
STOMVA3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMWAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVW AS - AAWN/1d30
AYOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVSS « AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS * AAWN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWSS * AAVN/1d3G
ATOMVAS + AAVN/Ld5G
ATOMV IS - AAVN/Ld30
SIOMVIS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d350
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/Ld30
AIOMWAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMV3S * AAVN/1d30
STOMVW3S - AAWN/1d30
AIOMVWAS - AAVN/Ld30
€8000z66'
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
€80002661
€80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
EB000ZEE!
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
8000766!
80002661
©8000Z661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
€80002661
EB000766+
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
ee000z661
80002661
©80002661
8000661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
€80002661
€80002661
©B000c661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
€80002661
80002661
€e000z661
€8000c661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
€e000z661
©80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
8000266)
€B000c661
S6rEL
6erel
C6rEL
E6reL
EOSEL
SISEL
orses
biSeL
OOSEL
vOSEL
EISeL
SOSEL
cIceL
coset
60SEL
BOSEL
PISEL
6iseL
BISEL
seset
beseb
ozseL
“eset
cuSet
QLSEL
ecseb
Lesel
Oesel
Gece
veSel
ZESeL
LESEL
SESEL
gece
csel
6eseL
Seset
SbSEL
OpSEL
\pSet
PSE
vesel
ISceL
6PSEL
6esel
gesel
OPSEL
LeSeEL
epset
CrseL
eSSet
esse
SSSEL
OSset
Qpsel
ySSEI
LSSEL
9Ssel
6SSEL
coset
S9SEL
e9sel
O9Sel
Loset
8SSEL
pOSEL
g9Sel
d9Se1
e9SEt
Odset
2LSEb
bLSEb
SLbEL
9Lvel
9SeL
vLSEL
SiSet
SbO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO O1-I6
£90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90° 01-16
€90 01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01°16
SpO-01-16
SPO 01-16
£90-01-16
SPO OL-16
SPO O1-16
€90°01-16
SpO-O1-16
€90- 01-16
SbO-O1-16
€90°01-16
SPO 01-16
SPO-O1-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
SPO-01-16
ShO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO O1-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
SPO O1-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
SbO-O1-16
ShO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SpO-O1-16
SpO-O1-16
SPO O1-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
SpO-Ol-16
SPO O1-16
SPO-O1-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
SPO O1-16
SvO-01-16
€90° 01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
SbO-O1-16
SPO OL-16
£€90-01-16
Sv0-01-16
€90°01-16
€90- 01-16
SPO O16
€90° 01-16
ShO-O1-16
€90-01-16
90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90° 01-16
SPO-O1-16
90-01-16
SPO O1-16
€90:01-16
006
008
Llp 9b
esp Ol
cer or
tpl
tp ol
ee OL
ee ol
bSoL
(4-3) }
6h ob
6h 91
bb Ot
bb OL
ble ot
Pee ot
eo
ves ot
Sos 91
Or ol
bSh OL
SPO
pr OL
br OL
60p 91
e6E9t
6e 91
4991
PS 9b
Les ot
€0S 91
e9p 91
po
tp ot
pol
esol
Sisal
sol
Sol
6r 91
OPO
ebb Ot
€6€ OL
9BE OL
bee OL
cps 91
tes ol
9p gl
9p OL
tip ot
80r OI
e6E Ot
segl
“£g91
69591
69S 91
dy ob
lp ob
dy or
9p 91
“Spot
6Eb 91
er ol
sos ot
9s ol
9s 91
6rS 91
Sol
ves a1
esol
esot
dpot
yo.
esol
905 91
gor
dsp al
bro
96/52/10
96/S2e/10
96/92/10
96/52/10)
96/92/10)
96/52/10
86/52/10
96/r2/10
96/62/10
86/P2/10
96/2/10
96/72/10)
96/r2/10
96/2/10)
96/r2/10
96/¢2/10)
86/62/10
96/€2/10)
96/Ee/10
96/2/10
96/62/10)
96/62/10
96/62/10
96/2/10)
96/E2/10
96/67/10
96/22/10
96/22/10
96/22/10}
96/2e/10
96/22/10)
96/22/10
96/22/10
96/22/10)
96/12/10
96/12/10)
96/12/10
96/12/40)
96/12/10)
96/12/10)
96/2/10
96/12/10
96/b2/t0
96/be/10
96/02/10
96/02/10)
96/02/10
96/02/10
96/02/10
96/02/10
96/02/10
96/02/10)
96/61/10
96/61/10)
96/61/10
96/61/10
96/61/10)
96/61/10
96/61/10
96/61/10
96/61/10
96/61/10)
96/81/10)
96/81/10)
96/81/10
96/81/10
96/1/10
96/81/10
96/81/10
96/81/10
96/81/10
96/81/10
96/Lb/10
96/L1/10
96/21/10)
86/L 1/10)
DO/LI/10)
Y3AIY SAWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AId SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SANVWHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
SAIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AId SAWVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSWWHL
Y3AIH S3WVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSNWHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSWWHL
Y3AId SAWVHL
USAIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSWWHL
Y3AIY S3WVHL
U3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AId SAWVHL
SAIN S3WVHL
Y3AIU SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVWHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3Aly SSWVHL
Y3AIy SSWWHL
SAIN SANVHL
Y3AIN SSAWHL
USAIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIM SSWVWHL
Y3AIN SSWWHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSNWHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SAWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIY SANVHL
Y3AIY S3NVHL
Y3AI4 SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AId SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AId SSANVHL
Y3AIN SAWVHL
Y3AId SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSWWHL
Y3AIY S3WVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSAVHL
Y3AIN SSWWHL
Y3AI8 SSNVHL
Y3AIW SSWVHL
Y3AIX SSWVHL
Y3Ald SSWWHL
Y3AIN S3SWVWHL
Y3AIy S3WVHL
Y3AIy SAWVHL
Y3AIN SANVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
UAL SAAWHL
AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d50
SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
JTOMV3S - MAvN/1d30
ATOMV3S * AAWN/1d3G
STOMVW3S « AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS * AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVA3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVSIS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d3G0
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AS TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/Ld30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d 5G
AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d 3G
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMYVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d 30
STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
AIOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMWAS * AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AS TOMVAS * AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G0
AS TOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d 30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d350
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVNW/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
AIOMVWAS = AAWN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STIOMVAS - MVN/1d30
ATOMV 3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMV3S * AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS * AAVN/Ld30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS = AAWN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVIS * AAVN/1d30
AIOMVAS - AAVN/ 1d 30,
€80002661
€80002661
€8000z661
€80002661
E€B000Z661
E80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€B000zE6!
€80002661
€8000Z661
80002661
80002661
8000266!
e8000z661
€8000z661
€B000Z661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
€e000z661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€B0002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
8000766)
80007661
80002661
B000Z66)
80002661
80002661
E€B000Z661
B000Z661
©B000Z661
€B000Z661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
€B0002661
80002661
80002661
€e000z661
€80002661
B000Z661
EB000Z661
ee000z661
€80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
SOPEL
OLPeL
6OvEL
€Orel
vOPEL
8Orel
66EE1
BPEL
€2pe
Cbpes
SIPEL
ecpeb
PIPE
9ZPeEL
OPEL
6IVEL
Level
Gere
Lever
CEvEL
pores
Servet
Ofrel
O2rel
bevel
SEreL
bPpeL
BErel
Level
OPPEL
SPrel
CrPrel
6EreL
ObPeL
Lerel
OSPEL
8Prel
eSPelL
HSPEL
6SPEL
OSPEL
SSPEL
ESE
PSPEL
dspet
Orel
SOpeL
BSPeL
corel
OPEL
SOPEL
POPE
BLPEL
ELpel
Zerel
bZpel
LOvEL
B9PeEL
OOPEL
bLPEL
69reL
Lheh
terel
Liver
OBrel
Orel
6LvEL
SPE
vere
Eerel
OPEL
BBPEL
86PEL
\6re
PEPE
L6PEL
SBPEL
AAWN
SOLO rE
910-LO-b6
910106
SIO 10 r6
SIO 10 r6
810 10 r6
B10 10 Fs
BIO lO rs
BIO 106
€90°01-16
1€0-01-16
€90-01-16
€90'01-16
SPO-O1-16
SbO-0!-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
SrO- 01-16
SPO 01-16
SPO-O1-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-1¢
90-01-16
€90°01-16
40-01-16
€90-01-16
LEO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
€90°01-16
SbO-Ol-16
€90:01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
1€0-O1-16
4E0-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
SPO 01-16
SPO-O1-16
SrO-O1-16
SPO-O1-16
SPO 01-16
SPO O1-16
SpO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
SbO-O1-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€90°01-16
€9001-16
€90-01-16
€90°01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
€90-01-16
SrO-O1-16
as
d2gab
eat
ze eh
ceo
ee ot
ce ot
feet
eo
door
6p 91
OP OL
9p OL
Or ol
6rr OL
Sep Ot
tpoL
pol
6E 91
6e 91
4591
69591
g9S Oo
eas ot
9s 9l
SSOL
Sol
6 91
by OL
ser ol
er ot
9se 91
pss ol
625 91
sol
L6r 91
8p el
8p ol
Pot
ero
Spo
PhO
cr oL
SOP Ot
26E Ot
eso
6r 91
6P 91
9lr ot
eZp ot
brol
vol
esol
sol
6r 91
6p 9L
€Sp OL
Sp ol
be OL
Bip OL
90> 91
6E Ot
ses ot
Sis or
sgt
ss9oL
€S 91
86r 91
6r9L
OrgoL
Spo
bro
“S94
So
Sol
gol
sol
rer ol
96/51/10
96/P 1/10
96/r1/10
96/E1/10
96/61/10)
96/61/10
96/01/10
96/01/10
96/60/10
96/1€/10}
96/1€/10)
Q6/bE/40
96/LE/10
96/1E/10
96/LE/10
96/1/10
96/1E/10
S6/LE/10
96/1E/10
96/0€/10
96/0€/10
96/0€/10
96/0€/10
96/08/10)
96/0€/10)
96/0€/10
96/0€/10)
96/08/10
96/0€/40
96/08/10
96/62/10)
96/82/10
96/82/10)
96/22/10)
96/L2/10
96/22/10)
96/22/10
96/2/40
96/L2/10
96/22/10
96/2/10
96/L2/40
96/22/10)
9692/10
9692/10
USAIN SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSAWHL
Y3AIY SSNVH1L
USAIN SSWVHL
Y3AIW SAWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVWHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSAVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SANVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSWWHL
Y3AIY SSWWHL
Y3AIN SAWVHL
Y3AIH SAWVHL
Y3AId SAWVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIY SAWVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
H3AIYN SSNWHL
Y3AIY SANVHL
YSAIY SAWVHL
Y3AIYN SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AId SSWVHL
SAIN S3WVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSWWHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIX SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWWHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIW SANVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSWNVHL
USAIN SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSNWHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIY SANVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SAWWHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIYN SSWVHL
Y3AIH SSNVHL
Y3AI¥ SSAVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIH SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNWHL
Y3AIN SSAVHL
Y3AIN SSWWHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIy SSNVHL
Y3AIW SSAVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
STOMVS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d3G
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVNW/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
JIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV SS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
JTOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d350
ATOMV3S - AAVNW/1d30
A TOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMV3S > AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMW3S * AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMWAS > AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMWSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVIS - AAWN/1d30
A IOMWAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAYN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMWAS - AAVN/Ld30
ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
ATIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
SIOMVWAS * AAVN/1d30
SIOMWAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
AIOMVWAS * AAWN/1d30
AIOMWASS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
AIOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVW3S - AAWN/1d30
STOMVWSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
STOMVSS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAWN/1d30
AIOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAYN/1d30
ATOMVIS - AAWN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAWN/1d30
AIOMVWAS - AAVN/Ld30
STOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
80002661
€e000css!
eeo00zs6 +
80002661
80002661
8000766!
80007661
80002661
80007661
€e000c661
800066!
eeo00z66!
eeo00zs6t
€8000z661
€e000z661
€e000zs6+
©80002661
80002661
80002661
€8000c661
€8000Z661
©8000¢66!
80002661
e8000z661
€8000z661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
ee000z66 1
eeo0ocsst
80002661
€8000z661
80002661
80007665
€e000zes +
e8000z661
80002661
8000661
€B0002661
€8000z661
80002661
E8000Z661
80002661
EB000Z661
€80002661
80007661
€80002661
€80002661
€e000z661
€80002661
€80002661
e8000z66'
EB000Z661
€80002661
80002661
e€8000z66t
800066!
€80002661
80002661
80007661
€e000z66!
80002661
€8000z661
€80002661
80002661
EB000Z661
€B000Z661
80002661
e8000z661
80002661
80002661
80002661
B000z661
ozsege
SLE6EZIL
€9001-16 = =M1 EL 0002
€9001-16 M1 eb soe
€9001-16 = =M1 eb 0012
€90 01-16 = =MT th Oork
€9001-16 M1 wth OOrt
€9001-16 = =M1 EL oset
€9001-16 M1 et 0012
€90:01-16 = M1 Cw. Oost
SPOOl-IG =vWE th OOZt
e900l-l16 MI 2b osel
e9001-16 = =M1 get 0s02
10-01-16 910 OL 008
4€001-16 310 OF 008
SPOOLI6 =VWF ESL oos!
€9001:16 M1 .92b 0002
SPOOI-IG =VWr .ObE SZSL
€9001-16 = =M1 .9bb 0091
€9001-16 =M1 CWA 0012
9101066 990 OL 006
9101066 990 01 SC
9O1IOrG O00 Ob 006
€9001-16 M7 .Eb osie
E90 01-16 =MT EL 0002
9101066 990 OF Seb
SrOOL16 WWF Leet 068t
SPOOlI6 =vwr tt 0091
€90°01-16 M1 eb 0002
SPOOL IG =vwr LE bE OOPL
9101066 9900 6 oso
€900b-16 = =MI Ob 0001
9101066 990 G6 ose
9010%6 900 OF 006
9101066 990 6 002
9101066 990 Ob 006
9101066 900 OL 006
9101066 990 01 006
9101066 900 OL 006
9101066 900 OF 008
9O1OrE 990 Ot 008
MSS
lap OUIN|OA [E10 },
PA Aong Aaen Sr eur ie pef|isodep OWNIOA [BOL
002
96/21/10)
961/10
96/91/10
961/10
96/51/10
Y3AIY SSWWHL
SAI SSNVHL
Y3AIW SAWWHL
Y3AId SSWWHL
Y3AId SSWWHL
Y3AIN SSWWHL
Y3AI8 SSNVHL
Y3AId SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
419 NOLOUD 8 NOGNOT M3N 'Y3AIY SSWVHL
19 'NOONO7 M3N 3 NOLOHD 'H3AIN SAWVHL
Y3AId SSAVHL
USAIN SSNVWHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSNWHL
¥3AId SSWVHL
Y3AIH SSNWHL
Y3AId SSWVHL
Y3AId SSAVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSNWHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIY SAWVHL
Y3AIY SAWNVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AI¥ SSNVHL
Y3AIN SSNVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
Y3Alu SSNWHL
Y3Ald SSWWHL
Y3AIH SSWVHL
Y3AIW SSWWHL
Y3AIY SSWVHL
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
AIOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
STOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVS3S - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAWN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d350
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS > AAWNW/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVS3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAWN/1d3G
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d350
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVW3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVAS - AAVN/Ld30
JTOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
A TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30,
ATOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
STIOMVWAS - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAWN/1d3G
ATOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVSS - AAV/1d30
STOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
ATOMV3S - AAVN/1d30
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/id 3G
STOMVAS - AAVN/1d3G
JS TOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
SIOMVAS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/1d30
ATOMVSS - AAVN/ 1d 30
SIOMVWAS - AAWN/1d50
8000266!
80002661
€8000Z661
€80002661
€80002661
80002661
€B000Z661
80002661
80007661
80002661
B000z661
80002661
€e000Z661
€80002661
€B000Z6E61
B000Z661
B000z661
80002661
80002661
80002661
©80002661
80002661
80002661
80002661
€e000z661
80002661
e©e000z661
€80002661
80002661
EB000Z661
80002661
B000CE6)
€80002661
€B000z661
8000z661
E8000Z661
80002661
€80002661
82rek
OSrel
bose
66PEL
LOSEL
SOSEL
e2set
69SEL
16261
6izel
velet
Lyle
leet
9Zeeh
SLEel
eLeel
pleel
SPlel
6PZeL
oOsZel
S6tel
OOrel
isle
Libel
veret
6erel
6rrel
6Leel
SOPEL
ezeeb
Szeeb
ceeel
6zee1
seeel
Steel
eeeel
Ozeel
b2ee
A6
1996-97 Disposal Season
6S tebe +W Zong 96-VGN eu) e pesodsig ewIn|OA 1e10L
Slop «PA Aong 96-VON ey) e pesodsig euINjoA |e}0 1
St0-0l-16 GOGH Ol 0s9 as 02 Bl6r el set ot be 6t Ore 240 Ol€e = L661/€2/S0} SONVYLN3S WNIHVW AWY34 SATVD
S10-01-16 GG ot 002 MS OL 926 el 26091 Ip ce Sle elt GS22 = L661/22/G0) JONVYLN3 VNIEVW AYY34 SATV9D
St0-0l-16 @Gu Ol os9 Ss Ob 906'b el 681 9r Ve 4 SSS} OSE SSIL 2661/¢2/S0)} SONVYLN3 VNIHVW AWYS4 SATV9D
S10-0l-16 8dyu Ol O02 M 08 c86P el 86191 be <4 SSEL Ort OF6 = 2661/12/SO] SONVHILNA VNIHVW AWS SSTVD
S10-01-16 Gqy oF 002 Ss SE yS6'P eL gZt9L bb ee Oprt Ste StOL 2661/12/S0} SONVYLN3 VNIEVW AWY34 S3TVD
S10-01-16 GOH OF 004 ASS 0€ cheb aL 819} tp <4 O12 v 00ze = =Z661/12/S0) SONVYLNS VNINVW AYHS4 SATV9
Gt0-€0:96 M3L 9 GL OO; 926° 2 246191 bb LAs oor Obee OEt2 4661/20/10) WNININOX90G OILNVIN
S10-€0-96 M3L 6 O0e Oot 668 ¥ eZ sseot by ia} 0002 ost 009) 2661/20/10 WNININOXDOGC OILNVIN
WNNLY39
dSNI L4VUC_ TOAAD HIG AONGYHS NINONOT O3GDNO7 NIWLV7 OaG1v7 1Sia
BWILLSY AWILdSIO 3Wild30
3ivadsid
4193f0uUd
VNIHVW AYHS4 SATVD
VNIYVAW Adu34 SATVD
VNIYVW AWH34 SATVD
VNIYVW AdH34 SATVD
VNIYVW Adu334 SATV9D
VNIYVAW AdY3S4 SSTV9D
WNININOX900 SILNVIN
WNININOX90” OILNVIN
S3SLLIWH3d
pEBZO9E6!
PEBZOSEEI SE6¥L 96-VON
bEBZO9EE) 9E6PhI 96-VON|
peecO9661 6E6hl 96-VON
pEBZOOEEL SE6rh1 96-VON
vEBcO9661 2€6h1 96-VON
2e8c09661 BELPL 96-VON
LE8Z09661 ZELhL 96-VON
WON LIWNad Gi dWvS AONa
A7
1997-98 Disposal Season
sl oreo Jej0) uoseas
Sz7e60e OSdr 12101 Pafad
StO-01-16 gaguscé 65% 008 68 tL Lez Ob by O LSl6€y OvELOZ O 6b OO Ory SEZL BIOL} SOIN 3ONVYLN3 WNINVW 4D VNINVW Adda SAIVS vERZORBEL = #ZOSL
S10-01-16 g@ous6 65+ 009 68ry cL Lez Ob ty 0 LSl6Ey BvEL9Z O ZZ OP 622 S 8101268 SQIN 3SONVYLN3 YNINVW S'S VNIMVW ANY3d SIIVS veez70886! = EZ0S
S10-01-16 g@qusé sz ler ose 60S’ el pz OF by 0 BSL6Eb Bpelez O 2% Ssst ySEb Spbb LbOLLG6 SGIN SONVYLNE YNINVW 4D VNINVW Audas SAIWS veazoosst 22051
St0-01-16 gau ob gses 00L tis» a ZEz OF ty O LGL6E¥ BveLee O 2 Obp ey OfEZ ZLIOLL66+ SQIN 3SONVYLNS VNINWW 49 VNINVW AYY3AS SAIVS 9£8z00861 20S)
StO-O1-16 gau oF zo 008 bos'y cL Sez Ob by O LSL6Eb LvELOt O 22 OvSL zoel SSOL O+O12681 SQIN 3JONVYLNA VNINWW 4 '9 VNINVW AYY34 SAIVS peez09est 02051
SLO--Ob-16 §a0u OF SSeS 0O0L 10S’ cL sez or tb O LGL6Ev LHELBZ O 22 OPE 6L Sphic StOLL66t SQIN SONVYLNA YNINVW 49D VNIMVW AYY3d SAIVS PE8Z0866l = B LOSE
Saple 008 le10, palag
StO-01-6 gay 8 est 002 els tL Zez ob tp O LSl6eb Opelezr O ZL 60r0868! SOIN AVG ONVISI ANid 19 LHOWA LLSSSOODANNSHS 288000861 47951
StO-O1-16 gau 2 GLobb ost SOS'b el bec or ty 0 OSl6Eb Leelee OL 80r08661 SIN AVG ONVISI SNid 10 LHOVA LLSSSODSNNSHS zes0006s8! 9z9St
St0-01-16 gdqu 2 Slob Ost bose ZL Sez Ob tb O LGl6€p Leetez O Lb 80r08661 SOIN AVG ONVISI SNid 190 LHOWA LLASSODANN3HS 288000661 SZ9SI
StO-0b-16 gdqu 8 est 002 else aL cez Ob tb O LGl6Eb Brelee OL LO¢08661 SOIN AVG ONVISI ANIld 19 LHOVA LLASSODANNSHS 2880006681 = 79S
SLO-O1-16 gau 2 Sel oor Lbpok = ZL 469 Eb bb 0 OSl6Eb OrEZEZ OL 80P08661 SOIN AVE ONVISIANId 1D LHOVA LLASSODSNN3HS 2880006681 ez0St
St0-01-16 gdqu 6 g6zz ooe esp (aa zez Ob bb O LGl6eb BrvElez OL SOvO866! SQIN AVA ONVISI SNid 19 LHOWA LLASSOODANN3HS 2880006681 2z9St
S10-01-16 dau @ ech 002 S¢7sb @ €zo bb O LSl6Ev BrELEZ OL rOrOR66! SOIN AVG ONVISI BNid 10 LHOWA LLASSODSNNSHS 2880006681 1298S!
SI9-01-16 gqu 2 sol Oot i el bZz Or bby O OSl6€b LreloZ O FLO 66h SQIN AVG GNVISI BNid 1D LHOVA LLASSODANNSHS 28800068} 6 10S)
600-01-16 Ody 6 SL°Lez ose tos’ el sez or tb O LSL6Eb LvELOe OO D PLOllest SQ1N AVG GNVISI ANId 10 LHOWA LLSSSODSNN3HS 288000661 E105}
8600-01-16 Ody 6 S62 OOe Sosy cL 22 Ob by O OSL6Eb Lbelez O B €101 2661 SOIN AVG GNVISI ANId 19 LHOWA LISSSODANNSHS 288000661 +h0SI
600-01-16 Ody @ Seer ose 10S’ y cL Sez ob bp O LSl6Eb Lvelee O 9 €1OlL66t SQN AVG GNVISI SNId 19 LHOWA LLASSODSNN3HS 268000661 600S
600-01-16 Ody 8 est 002 SOS'p cL bz ob lb O OSl6Eb LpeI9e OO C1066 SGIN AVG ONVISI ANId 10 LHOVA LLSSSOODSNN3HS 288000661 O10SI
8600-01-16 Ody SL es 002 40s’ (qi Sez ob ty O LGl6eh LeelezZ 0 8 ZLO1 L664 SIN AVG ONVISI ANId 10 LHOVA LLASSODANN3HS 28800066! 800S!
600-01-16 Ody 6 80E OOF esp (qi zez OL ty O LG6Eb eBpelsze 0 9 bLOZ661 SOIN AVG ONVISI ANId 10 LHOWA LLSSSODSNN3HS 288000861 —L00SI
600-01-16 Ody 6 80£ OOP ers aL zez ob bb 0 LGl6€e eBperse 0 9 +40) 2681 SGN AVE GNVISI ANId 19 LHOVA LLSSSODSNN3HS 28800066 9800S
600-01-16 Ody 6 S0E 00r esp el ZEZ OF by O LSl6€h Bperse O 9 bhOb 2681 SQIN AV@ ONVISI ANId 19 LHOVA LLASSODSNN3HS 28800066 F00S
600-01-16 Odd 6 80E 00b 40S’ (qi Sez ob tb O LSL6Eb Lbelsz O 8 0101266) SQIN AVG OGNVISI SNId 1D LHOWA LLASSOOANNSHS 728800066! SOOSI
GhO-O1-16 aay 8 S622 ooe vy e #2 Ob bb 0 0 tt) oz O1OLZ68 SOIN AVG ONVISI ANId 10 LHOVA LLSSSODSNN3HS 28800086+ 0005S!
St0-01-16 aay 8 S622 OOE Sr cL ez or ly 0 0 0 4 01602661 SGN AVG ONVISI SNid 1D LHOVA LLSSSOOSNN3HS 288000681 —_—*L00S1
a#dsuj jewuidsuy yerq (evWi0A (evo)i0\ UWu0] Bequo7 uiWiey Seq UesO7 uel07 aeq = aus WEN Hala eauad wUWWad
ye7
Appendix B
REMOTS® Results
Bla
NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex 1992
) ) 4 bhb © OS'ZE Spool er 0 z yoEe 4 v< nebeas oql = pez Ss 26608 e asgoe 46-1N
0 0 +20 890 SObt 2€01 1s0 t ZO 0 ¥< e6e1S oqf = =90e ~=—s e808 2 so0e 16-1N
) 0 196 720 786 +6 0 0 ZO be p< |e6eis oqf = s0z~—Ss 26808 q sooe 16-1N
0 ) ee6 €90 ZOl 496 0 0 Zoho p< la6eis ogi = £02 ~—sz6808 e& sooe +6-1N
) 0 0 ) 0 ) 0 0 x x x oq = kez 26808 2 u00e 16-1N
0 0 sey 10 8 szs PP ) 0 £02 O ¥< i aBeig NO | a6e1S ogi = oe@~Ss 26808 q u00e 46-1N
0 ) 892 LeO z62 Sh 0 ) £92 O v< 1eBeis oq = Azz 26808 e@ Ugo 16-1N
) 0 zo 860% SSL 90'S 0 0 poe +f v< i aBeisg NO | aBe1S oqi = =gS0} = 26608 9 auaQgoe 16-1N
ft) ft) ser 90 99'p 90¢ 0 0 £92 O € x oq sso = z6608 q auagoe 16-1N
) ) 661 60 9rz rao ) ) yore 0 ¥ 1a6eis oql 250} += z6608 8 auagoe 16-1N
0 0 dpe 940 S98 608 0 0 poe + p< 1eBe\s oq) = Zt =S ss Z6808 9 900€ 16-1N
0 ) 176 0 6€%@b)0 286 6s'8 0 0 yore 4 v< 1 e6e\s og =k Ss 6808 Q 2008 16-1N
) ) 0 0 ) 0 0 ) enz 4 v< x og = bE Ss 26808 e@ 900 16-1N
0 0 969 leo 22 €2'9 0 0 poe 4 v< jeBeis oq} = BEL = Z808 2 m00z 16-1N
0 0 bol e60 Lz 219 0 0 roe 4 r< | e6e1s oa! ze} =. Z6808 q ™00z +6-1N
() ) 299 sso 69 seo () 0 p< 1 p< 1eBeis og = gEt_~=—s 2808 e Mm00z 16-1N
) ) ) 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x og = SES 26808 2 MSQ0Z 16-1N
) ) 2Z€0l 8072 +tPhtL £6 ) 0 pOE F p< yebeis ogi = @pE = 26808 q ™so0z }6-1N
0 ) 99h g0€ 29 Zhe ) ) poe Zz v< 1e6e1S og’ = @pE—Ss 26808 & msQ0Z 16-1N
) ) 609 eb L9b 6rsl 0 ) yOE Zz v 1 a6e)s ogi = 90 ~S ss z6808 2 98sgoz 16-1N
0 i) 0 0 ) ) 0 ) x x x x coal = soe = z6808 e esooz 16-1N
0 ) el 490 ©= EEL 9921 be0 z roe Zz p< 1ebeis oq} == 26808 2 s00z 16-1N
0 ) ez} 46 ZO BEEF 9h 0 ft) yoEe | v< 1 e6e1S oq = 60z_~Ss 26808 q so0z 16-1N
0 0 StZ@t 180 = 99.24 Seb ) 0 poe | p< e6eis oq = 802 ~=—s 26808 e sooz +6-7N
0 0 eztt S20 9941 1601 ) 0 poe | p< 1a6e1S oql = be ~SsZ6808 2 mugoz 16-1N
0 ) 2@L Sree 6re +09 0 ) yore 4 ¥ 130NI oq = Shes 26808 q mugog 46-N
) 0 (yl ee 4 2 Lol 0 0 eZ 4 v WeBbeis oq] = @pz_—Ss 8808 & mug0z 16-1N
0 0 bee 80 S68 le ) 0 ez 4 ¥ | e6eis oql = =6sOh = 26808 2 eu0dz 46-1N
) ) 906 eft 296 6r8 0 0 p< 62 v< eBeis NO 1 e6e1S ogi = SOPs 26808 q eug0Z 16-1N
0 0 e901 9F0 1601 Spol 0 0 poe 4 v< abeis NO! e6e1S oql = Oh = 26808 e 98ugoz 16-1N
0 0 80S 60 szs 16 0 0 yOE 0 ¥< 1 e6eiS oq = b@Z_—Ss« 21688 9 u00z 16-1N
() 0 ech 680 edt 680 0 ) POE 4 ¥ x og’ = €zz_—s«s 8808 q uo00z +6-1N
) 0 299 SOL 6rL 72h) ) 0 poe 4 p< abeis oq = €z@_—Ss 26808 e@ ug0z 16-1N
) ) Sok 90 6801 ¢Z 01 0 0 poe 4 v< | a6e)$ J: a 4 31°10) 2 8002 +6-1N
0 ) 6Z0l 82 €z2t see ) 0 poe 4f p< 1 a6eig og’ = OZ_—Ss 26808 q 28002 16-1N
) 0 6s'8 iSO 8 ©6sB8 re8 ) ) yOoEe 4} < 1 @BeIS NO I eBeIS oa’ =z =Sss 28808 & 28002 16-1N
0 0 te9 $0 959 so'9 0 0 POE f v< 126e1S oat = bE ~Ss 26808 2 MOO} 16-1N
0 0 SyZL BLL POEL SOLL 0 ) yoe 4 v< Webeis oat = @E_—Ss 26808 e MOOL 16-1N
ty) 0 ero Sre LL sz ty) 0 roe Zz Beis oq =. zS€~— 26808 2 MSOOL 16-1N
) ) ft) ty) 0 ) 0 ) x x x x of = ze 26808 q ™soOL 16-1N
0 0 ) 0 ty) 0 0 0 x x x x coal =sbSe.~=—s zeg08 e MSO 16-1N
0 ) €8S 2b 628 Lee 0 ) poe 4 p< 1e6e1s oq = Z0E-—SOs 26808 2 eSQOL 46-1N
0 0 799 =pze «be e8 Ss 0 0 ez 4 C je6eis oq = koe~S Ss 26808 q 8so001 16-1N
0 0 28 Zh €8'8 29L 0 0 ez 4 p< 1e6eis coal = KOE =Ss 8808 e 9sool 16-1N
0 ) sve eb 616 ze2 0 0 £92 0 ¢< aBeis NO 1 86e)S oq = bkz@_=Ss 26808 2 soot +6-1N
) ) 20! 490 e801 166 ft) 0 rE O p< . 1e6eIS oq} = bz 26808 q soo} 16-1N
0 ) zez@ 26 8900 42 Z £02 ) ) zor oF v< 1e6e\S oa =k ~Ss 26808 e soot 16-1N
) 0 zeL ple L8 9 0 ) ez | v< abeis NO 1 a6e1S oq = gz 6808 9 MUQOL 16-1N
) 0 zeg SzhoL slg ) 0 poe f v< 1e6e1S cal = bSZ—Ss BOB q MuoOL $6-1N
ft) ) 7a) ee =I BLL ) 0 ez 4 % 11 e6e1S oq’ = Sz ~=—Ss z6808 e MuQO} 16-1N
ft) ty) 99b Slt G6 6LE ty) 0 £02 Zz % 1aBas oq) = eSE_~— ss: 26808 2 9UugoL 16-1N
0 ) 79 06 let LL ees 0 ) vOE O ¥< i aBes NO 1 a6e1S ogi = ese = 26808 q eu00} 16-1N
0 ) €66 g€0 2101 626 ) 0 vOE Zz v< 1ebes ogi = gS€_~=—s- 26808 e au0ol $6-1N
0 ) 6bb 940 Leb bhp ) 0 poe 0 v< 1a6e1S og = ozz_—Ss 26808 2 u00dF 16-1N
ft) 0 7a Zt Lez Ve ) 0 poe Zz v< x oq = k@_—SSs« 26808 q uook 46-1N
) ) tes Mh 9Lg 99'p ) 0 yore 0 v< tebe oq = tz = 26808 e@ ugot 16-1N
) ) 9656 950 79 89S 0 0 ez 1 p< | e6eis oa = =6€ztt §=—- 26608 } 8001 16-1N
) ) e9e€ 2b €F 90€ 0 0 e072 4 v< 1 aBeis ogi = 2@ztt = 26608 ® 8001 16-1N
0 0 98h 690 125 eb 0 0 ez 41 p< )eBe)s oq] = 22st = 26608 P e001 16-1N
) ) we s¢0 8 sLz oir 0 0 A € 1e6e1S oqf §=6Szt = z6808 9 8001 16-1N
t) 0 6Le bh 9b ee () 0 AT p< 1a6e)S oq! bzt 6808 e200 46-1N
xew UI-_ ues-w abuey wnuwixeyy WNWIUIW Payaweig yUNDD WNWIXeW) WNWIUIW
ssauyoiyL apow ] easy Jay
Punogay XOP3Y | evayey pabpaig uolesjauag esawed sise|jopnw soley (1ud) zig uleID aBels jeuolssao9ng japnyi6uo7 epmyeq ishjeuy ew day uoneis —;punow
ON Jeo\Boj0\8 0 ’ e esooe be-IN|SEzZO = ZO 0 lee e asooe
ON lea\6oj01g 0 668 2 SQDE 16-1N]68 66 66 66 2 so0e
ON 1e2)sAUd ) 68 a sone 16-1N]66 66 68 68 q so0e
ON yeaisAud 0 66 e —-sQoe 16-1N166 66 66 68 e sooe
ON x 0 66 2 -u00e 16-INJO 0 0 ) 2 u00e
ON yeashud 0 L q = -ugoe H6-IN|SZ6'0 bt 190 ez el q_ uooe
ON jeo\Boj01g ) e -ug0e HO-INISHZL = CBZ Vb LE'€Z e uo0e
ON leajskud ) 9 2 eUan0e 16-IN|SS90 680 zo 116 2 auagoe
ON ayeulWue}apu} ) 66 q euagoe +6-1N]68 66 66 66 q euag0e
ON jeai6oj01g ) € e@ auagoe H6-1N|S08°0 = 90°F sso Zh & auan0e
ON leo\Gojo1g 0 9 9 = a00e H6-INJ60€ 97€ 267 66 ly 2 9800
ON jeajo01g 0 ¢ Q 800€ 16-IN|9Z4 9rz 901 sg'ez q 9800€
ON 0 66 e anne 46-IN/O ) ) ) e 9800
ON ! 0 z 2 -M00z 16-1N] p20 bh 8e0 266 2 M00z
ON Jeo\Bojo1g ) S q 002 bE-INIS'Z @ze elt ee ee q m00z
ON leaiBojo1g ) € e mo0z H6-IN|S8hL = SB L zv0 91 e mo0z
ON x 0 66 2 MsQOz 16-IN]O ) ) Lt) 2 ms00z
ON jeaiskud 0 9 q_ = _™s00z WE-INISPLZ = -6ZE 1 8662 q mso0z
ON jeaiBoj01g 0 e msooz 16-1N] PS} Szz €8°0 12 e Msooz
ON leo1Gojo1g ) 9 2 esonz HE-IN|SP2Z OLE eel 8'0E 2 8s00Z
ON x ) 66 e asooz 16-IN}O 0 0 ) e oasooz
ON jeo\Boj01g 0 ¢ 2 so0z He-IN|8e'0 = 6S 0 4V0 els 2 s00z
ON jeo\6oj01g ) S qq s00z 16-1N/8't 202 680 661 q so0z
ON ) 9 e —-so0z He-IN]SeBt = =9bz 19} 2g'Sz e s00z
ON Jeo\Bojo1g 0 9 2 Munoz HE-IN|SPZE 91 eez £9'>b 29 MuUQOZ
ON teo\Boj01g ) 66 q = muo00z HE-IN|SBE'E 29°F V2 90°Lb q mugoZ
ON Je\6oj01g 0 6 e muooz HO-IN|SSP'b = €e'S ase 2z'49 e mug0z
ON jeaiskud 0 , 2 eugoz HB-IN|SOL} = 46-2 sO 6E EZ 2 8u00Z
ON Jeo\Boj01g 0 8 q au00z 16-7N]S8'1 egz zh pS'SZ q eup0z
ON jeo\6o/01g 0 6 e eug02 HO-IN|P9% = LOZ 12z hose e eug0z
ON leo\6oj01g 0 v 9 -ug0z He-IN|SOB'} «= az 1b ier4 9 u00z
ON jea)Boj01g ) 66 q —-uo0z 16-1N|]890 =90'F £0 606 q ug0z
ON (ea1Bojo1g ) 66 e —- ug0z 16-1N|66 68 66 66 e ug0g
% ON 1eo\Bojo1g ) ¥ 2 8002 H6-IN|]SO9t 202 bh $01 9 3002
ON jeajskud ) Ss q 8002 +6-1N169°0 ral’ 1s°0 68th q 2002
ON yea|6oj01g 0 9 e 8002 H6e-INISS0 =. 9'0 ve0 GL e a00z
ON jeajBojo1g ) 66 2 MOOL 16-1N|66 66 66 66 2 OOF
ON 1eo\Bojo1g 0 66 e moot 16-1N]66 66 66 668 e moor
ON jea16oj01g 0 Ss 2 MSQOL HE-IN|SBEZ «GE ez eze 2 MSOOL
ON x 0 66 q_ *sO0} $6-1N/66 66 668 66 q ™sooL
ON x ) 66 e msool 46-1N|O0 0 0 0 e MSQOL
ON yeaiskud 0 € 2 @sgot $6-N162°0 1 850 $601 2 e@sQ0}
x} ON yeaisAUd ) ¢ q 98s00t H6-IN|SOOL = LEZ vOL 96 12 q e8so0}
jevayew pabpasp yep Jano pues pasojoo YB] ON 1eaiskUd ) % e asool bE-IN| LZ 4 z yt 6E ez e 9soot
deo pues sjuaw6ey \jays awos} ON jea16oj01g ) 66 2 s0dk 16-IN|66 66 66 66 2 S00}
deo sadej uy Aejo abiaq) §=ON leo1Gojo1g 0 66 q SOOL $6-1N|66 66 66 68 q soo}
psB49q Ul poom adaid deo sjjays ewos epejg sses6 ade) spiospAy ON jea1Bojo1g 0 S e soo 16-1N]9'2 96:2 Tard Lse e soot
x! ON yeashud 0 6 2 mugoL H6-IN]S99Z LE 764 £298 2 MuU0O}
ewp 9184] ON yeaisAyd 1) 9 q = muool HE-INISOLE 6z'P 764 zoer q mugo}
ewp o181) ON leash ) 9 e muool HE-IN|SPOZ = Zh 29 $082 e MudOL
ewp 3184) ON jeaishud 0 ¥ 2 aud} HE-IN|SIGL = 22 va 91 92 2 eu0nl
Jeauan pues uly} ON ayeuluuajapu} ) Z q eu00! HE-IN|SEP} = ZB'F iy 266} q eU00}
x! ON jea1Bojo1g 0 9 e@ eugo} HB-IN|STZ = GLZ SL BL le e auddl
edeo — sjuawBey jays yim pues Buy} ~=ON jeo1Bojolg 0 66 2 -ud0d} 16-1N/66 68 68 68 2 u00t
S\jays ewWOS sy90J spjospAy puNoi6 pieyy] ON teashd 0 66 q voor 16-1N}66 66 66 66 Q 00h
sjuawBey jays yes gdeod sugep eoeyns) ON jeo\6oj01g ty) 66 e -udoh 16-1N|66 66 66 66 e udol
cwp Jano deo adeyns uo sugap jueid sjjays BWOS} ~ ON feo1Bojo1g 0 % 4 8001 HE-IN|SZO'Z = PS Z 1st 99°82 4 300}
edojs awos ¢deo Ajqissod} ON jea\6oj01g 1) € ® 8001 16-1N|¢9°0 801 90 zo4b @ 300}
easojpseypds = gjeuajyew deo] ON leo\6oj01g ) ¢ P8001 KE-IN|SZS't = 0Z 801 6122 P a00t
jeuajew deo pues} ON teojsAUd ) S 2 8004 HEIN]SISZ 622 [yard GE PE 2 23001
wp Jano deo es adojs awos| ON teo\6oj01g 0 £ e 8001 L6-IN|S8PL —6zz 890 19°02 e 3001
ueaw wnwixeyy Wnwiulyy ealy
eay joy
ealy jay
sjuawWwoD| OG MO7 JedueqNisig ee~NS }juNDD eueyaW {iso day uoyeis SSaUNdIUL Ady juaeddy day uoneis /puno;w
spunow
ocoooooooocoocoocoocecococoococcececcocceococoeceocecoCceoeceeeceeceeceeceeceeCeCeeeCeeeCeCeCeOeCeCeOeaeeCeCCcCSe
oeoooo00o00c0cceccececCGCcCCCCCCCeCeCeCeCeeecCeeceCeeCCeCCeCCeCeOCCOCCOCCoC OOOO OO eC OO eC OOO COCO
PSS
Heel
POL
QiSt
Sz Ob
ve rl
62S1
0
it)
822
Blt
9
bP
9s'€
0
0)
9S tb
8€8
bh 6
See
0
ele
0
cSt
Laws
8661
c6'9t
sooo
x
=
Ss
=
punoqgay xopay
SS@UyIIYL
leuajeyy pabpaig
6S°0 ves
8€0 cre
sso €29
*S'0 vob
ceb elel
120 Ze bt
4 eS eb
abt Zu bb
ett 26
tLe 9821
eso 9101
660 Leet
490 z90l
BEL Lob
180 Ob
440 AA}
slo S66
ber €$'6
s60 bt 6h
62€ zat
0 0
lee 6a Lb
901 GLb
Ist es fy
eo 499
80 ozs
Blt S/O}
690 tL
6S0 ce'6
920 69
860 SOE
6S 0 elt
cr 0 988
490 96 01
gob Sol
Zh SS}
Seo te6l
601 PO Lt
set OLS}
po} Sz ob
dub ve rl
AA) 62st
hh eer
£0 622
wh sel
6h 82t
6e1 cg
(4-A0) vy
byt 9s
901 92th
elt 986
80 gS tt
680 8e8
6S°0 brs
664 SBE
0 0
657 ele
990 oe
S00 ost
t€0 br Lt
801 8661
AAA c6 9b
ebuey wnwixeyy wnwiuiW paeweig qui
UONeaUag BIAWED
SLL
08
819
Z0L
Srl
Ob bt
1201
or
208
Sto
$96
8241
S66
c8'6
6201
See
c6
cee
98h Z
bere
0
ecs} 6
SP ol
toe
0S
LULL
468
9S°9
£26
819
402
6b
bbe
62 OL
cee
ere 60
96'8t 4g0
SS9OL cr 0
BL EL 0
198 620
dbet 0
24O'rL 0
ere 0
664 0
819 0
650 0
eer 0
86'€ 0
(a4 0
zo 0
ele 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
NN
ooetooo
oo
oO
i“
o
on
Oo oo
Oo
0
0
0
S
1
0
0
t
0
0
0
0
(0)
@
b
0
0
0
4
0
0
€
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
b
t
S
0
tt)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
St tt it)
6rL 0
see 0
98 0
0 0
vet 0
Spe 0
99'b S 9
ebb 0
68 90 4
er ZL 0 0
ni
ye)
S|SejOpnw
ZOF
ZO
EZ
poe
POE
poe
yore
PoE
£2
POE
poe
vOEe
poe
yore
poe
vo|e
yore
poe
pore
poe
p<
poe
vOe
vOE
poe
poe
POE
£2
POE
£2
POE
Poe
£2
EO?
£07
p<
POE
poe
poe
vole
POLE
£2
Pore
0% }-
pore
pore
Vole
£72
£2
poe
yO’
yore
POE
vole
p<
POE
pore
£2
vole
poe
PoE
poe
apow
Jolew
0
0
0
U
b
'
t
t
0
0
0
0
t
‘
t
t
t
b
b
b
@
4
‘
b
‘
0
0
0
0
b
0
b
0
0
t
t
'
'
t
1
b
t
4
t
t
0
4
0
'
0
0
1
t
t
b
4
b
t
t
I
0
W
(1ud) ezis UleEID
p< labels
b< 1eBe\s
t< | aBeis NO 1 86eIS
v< 1 e6e1S
p< e6eS
b< I <- | a6e)S
v< 1abeis
p< ne6beis
p< 1aBeis
P< jabeis
b< i e6e1s NO 1 eBeIs
t< i abeis NO 1 eBeIS
p< il aes NO 1 eb
v< i e6eis NO 11 eBeIS
v< in e6e1s NO Il eBaIS
p< Wabes
v< i aBeIS NO Hl eBeIS
p< i a6e1S NO Il eBeIS
b< nebeas
p< I <- 1 e6e1S
v< 1 e6e1S
p< x
p< aBbeis
vp x
p< x
p< 1862S NO Il ebaS
p< in BES NO 11 eBe1S
b< aBeis NO | ebeIs
p< ebeais
< 1 Beis
b< x
p< x
p< e6eis
p< in aBeIs NO 11 eBeIS
v< I <- | a6e1S
v< 1a6eS
v< jabeis
p< I <- | a6e1S
v< abeis
p< abe
p< nebeas
p< a6eis
P< x
p< x
v< }e6els
P x
p< i e6e1S NO | ees
p< x
v x
p< 1e6as
b< | abeis
p< i aBeIS NO I Beis
p< i e6as NO1ebeS
p< i aBeis NO 11 eBe1S
p< x
v< x
p< x
7 labels
p< x
v< 1 aBeis
p< nebeis
P< 11 aBeIs
NWIKeEW) WNWIUIW
oq!
oq!
oq/
oaq/
oq/
oql
ql
oq!
ol
oct
621
8z
Spt
pelt
ert
z0cb
bozb
o0zt
osol
6r0L
SroL
chbb
Zhbb
bbb
LEZb
224
gez
OStt
6rbh
Orbt
4)
2021
ese
Lge
dsc
Ohhh
Olt
Shh
Ort
ort
SPL
€bzb
€b2b
cheb
pSht
PSth
est
6L2
22h
gle
912
402
002
6SI
LE2
9€2
bee
SOb-
volt
€Obt
80h
201
901
cb
ehh
bet
osc
6bcl
8r2t
222
922
aBejs jeuoissaoons japnyiGu07 apnyye7 ishjeuy ew,
26808
26808
26808
26608
26608
26608
26608
26608
26608
26608
c6608
26608
76608
26608
76608
26608
26608
26608
76608
26608
26608
76608
76608
76608
26608
26608
26608
26608
26608
z6808
26808
76808
76608
26608
26608
26608
26608
26608
76608
c6608
¢c6608
26608
26808
26808
26808
26808
26808
76808
76608
26608
26608
26808
26808
c6808
26808
76808
76808
26608
76608
76608
76608
76608
aeg
e Bi)
2 89S009
q 88s009
® 88S009
9 98s009
q @s009
€ 9so09
2 =s009
q_ s009
e s009
2 38009
q 98009
e@ 93009
2 assoos
q essoos
& 9ssoos
2 8aS00S
q easo0s
® 8aso0g
9S00S
e soos
9 =s00S
q_ soos
e soos
2 3900S
q
e
i)
q
oa
2800S
2800S
MOOP
MO0F
e Moor
2 essoor
q 8SSO0r
& essoopy
2 easQor
q 88S00b
© 9asooPr
8S00b
3soor
8s00r
9s00b
SO0Ob
SOOv
SOOb
UOOP
Uu00r
U00r
9 eueQor
q 8ua00r
e auagor
2 2800
300P
800+
MOOE
MO00E
O00E
2 essgoe
q 9ssooe
e assgog
2 asooe
q _9sgoe
powmonovn ov
i)
moovo
‘day uonels
16-1N
+6-1N
46-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
16-1N
46-1N
16-1N
16-1N
16-0N
16-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
16-1N
46-1N
16-1N
16-1N
16-1N
16-1N
16-1N
16-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
46-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
t6-1N
+6-1N
46-1N
46-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
+6-1N
+6-1N
46-1N
46-1N
}6-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
16-1N
16-1N
+6-1N
ealy Jay
/punow
lea\Bojo1g tt) v 9 4 I6-IN|S9L Dir 460 €p72z
leo|60j01g 0 S q 4 16-IN|8b 2 87 (A%4 SOE
leo\Boj01g 0 8 e 49 bE-IN|SSZ4 9©68S2 €60 Bez
leo8oj01g 0 v a 8358009 }6-IN|S810 8 ©6ZE0 0 ese 9 888009
jeo}6oj01g 0 v q 985009 I6-IN/SZ@ZO0 =€€0 zho Ve q 835009
jea)Boj01g 0 € e 825009 b6-IN/ZE0 z90 (40) 90S & 88s009
leaiskyd 0 66 2 =9s009 +6-IN|66 66 66 66 9 9S009
1ea\6o)01g 0 S q 8s009 16-1Nj]8'0 SO- sso 60 bE q 8sQ09
jeaBojo1g 0 € e 8soog 46-1N] 780 601 6s'0 Lv bt e 8so09
leo)Bojo1g 0 8 a S009 FE-INJSHZ 1 = pS 7 680 62h 2 s009
Jeo\Bojo1g 0 Z q S009 46-1N| 260 seb 690 POEL q s009
1eo)Bojo1g 0 Z e S009 t6-IN}SBZt ASL 801 81 el e s009
leo\6oj01g 0 Z ) 8009 }6-IN|SS6O = bh L 4¢0 bel 2 8009
jea16oj01g 0 9 q 8009 b6-IN|ZZ:0 be ve0 966 q 8009
0 9 e 8009 b6-IN|>'0 £90 440 ess e 8009
I 0 9 2 9ssoos HE-IN|SSS'| = 20°? 601 S602 9 8ssgos
jea1Bojo1g 0 6 q 9ssoos 16-IN|62°2 4 891 €9 Le q 8ssooS
yeaishyd 0 Z e essoos }6-IN|SOBO 8=ZbL ve0 ee?ch ® essoos
jeo\Boj01g 0 S 9 8asg0s }6-1N/*6°0 cyt 90 9LeL 9 88S00S
tealsAud 0 € q 98aso0s 16-IN]’S'0 801 0 eel q 888005
x 0 66 e easoos +6-1N|66 66 66 66 & aasgos
leash 0 66 q 9soos b6-IN|SZ0 s'0 0 bye q 98soos
jea1Bojo1g 0 @ e 9so0s 16-IN|SPbO 650 €0 609 e asoos
ayeujuuajapul 0 66 o soos HB-IN|SZZt BBL 4v0 ce lt 3 soos
tea1shud 0 66 q soos bE-IN|ZE LE elt zs'0 99'S} q soos
jea1Bojo1g 0 8 e soos 16-1N] 28° vb? ot 82 Sc @ soos
jeaiskud 0 Z oS) 2800S b6-IN| PPL S6t €60 pL6l 3 9800S
jea18o)0\g 0 6 q 6800S HGEIN|SZb2 8 8LbE ert 96'€E q 9800S
jeo|6oj01g 0 S e 2800S FE-IN| FEF £072 650 PELL e 9800S
lea\Boj01g 0 € a MOOb }6-INJE6'0 bet (AN) As 2 M00r
jea1Bojo1g 0 66 q MO00b 16-IN|SE90 60 €0 s98 q MO00Pr
teaiskud 0 66 e MO00b 16-IN|9Z 0 €60 6S°0 Se ol e& Moor
ieo\6oj01g 0 v 9 8ssodr b6-1N]29'0 c6 0 cb0 606 9 8ssoor
jeashud 0 8 Q eSSO0b HB-IN|SEOZ = ELZ vel St ez q 8sso0r
jeo)Bojo1g 0 v e essodr +6-1N/6°0 It 620 6221 & 8SSO0b
leash 0 4 9 983800 }6-IN] bP 0 90 20 els 9 88S00r
leash 0 é q 88S00b b6-IN]#S'0 801 0 bod q 88S00r
1eo\6oj01g 0 € e ee8S00dr b6-IN| 0 sso 920 erg & e8so0r
jea1Bojo1g 0 v Pp 8S00b HKE-IN|SZE0 9F0 620 vhs P 8S00r
teashud 0 v 2 =9S00r b6-IN]6S°0 sob €10 soe 9 8S00b
leo\6oj01g 0 v Q 98S00F b6-IN|9Z 0 cs0 0 6S Q 98S00P
leaiBojo1g 0 0 e esoor b6-IN|Zb.0 ve0 0 be? e 8soor
jeaysAud 0 66 a SO0r +6-IN] 160 Sel 40 Lech 9 S00r
leash 0 66 q SOOp b6-IN]66 66 66 66 q soor
lea1Bojo1q 0 € e SO0b b6-IN|SZ bl} 920 24024 e soodr
jeaiskud 0 66 2 U00r b6-IN|66 66 66 66 2 u00r
jeo)6oj01g 0 66 q Uu00b 16-IN}66 66 66 66 q voor
jeo\Boj01g 0 66 e U00r b6-IN/66 66 66 66 e uod0r
1eajsUd 0 66 2 8ua0d0r t6-IN|66 66 66 66 9 eua00r
lea1Bojo1g 0 4 q euB00r 16-IN| PEO sso €+0 cle q eus00b
leajshud 0 y e s8ue0dr 16-IN] 294 SZ 80 20 €2 © eua00r
1eo180/01g 0 66 9 800¢ 16-IN]66 66 66 66 2 8006
leo,Bojo1g 0 Z q 800b t6-IN|SS60 901 s80 62h 8006
lea16oj01g 0 Z e 8006 E-IN|SOZ? tL §=6e0'? 8e0 boot 8006
teo)6o\01g 0 66 a MOO0E 16-1N}¢ 0 €90 440 vs MOOE
jeo1Bojo1g 0 66 q MODE b6-IN|66 66 66 66 MOOE
jea\Boj01g 0 66 e MOOE HE-IN|SOZ + = 402% Pe 0 6E 91 MOOE
teajshud 0 € 2 9Ssooe 16-1N{66'0 Aa! 9s':0 peel 9 @SSQOE
1eajshud 0 66 Q 9SSO0E HE-IN|SHZ0 ©6014 Peo 486 q assooe
jea1Bojo1g 0 + e assooe 16-IN]SP90 S60 Pve0 68 & assooe
leash 0 v 9 =98sgoe $6-1N]92°0 zs 0 0 6S Ee 9 asooe
leash 0 S q___8s00e HE-IN|SZZ:0 SSF 0 p80 q_9so0e
veayy Wwnuwixey WaWiUIW ealy
ealy jay
day uoneis manent ssauyolul Gdy juaseddy ‘day uonelsg ypunow
ealy jay
S|UaWWOD) OG Mo7 faoUeGN)sig edeUNS UND eueyeW} SO
Blb
NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex 1995
eqn ued o}=10<WO WS]
jew eqn)! vod 0} = 10 < WO ‘WS
SPIOA pur S4OeI9 ' pNs UO OBe\WOSse jeune) OsUDP ‘Ud oO} = 10 < WO ‘WS
SINSOOIS
OIN30018
OIN30018
xroao
S)oe pe 20a ‘sony poiychue "Yidop je ploa by Woquiy
102 Www Oqn) podiydwe ! vod 0} = 10 < WG ‘WS
jew eqn) podiydwe ‘ws ! ved oj = 10 < WO
SINSOOI8
OINSDOI8
SIN39018
jew oqn) podiydwe esuep "ued=10<WO WS
taouing 6) ‘soqn) podiydwe BurAesep ‘ws ‘ued = 10 < Wa
ys jossnw 4 ‘seqn) jydwe mei ‘uiy) “A Gd ! ued = 10 < WO peonpel ‘A
SINS9OI8
SIN39018
SIN39018
1 1S 16/52/80
I LS 16/52/80
NO Ir 1Si6/S2/80
jeu} pu} = GNI
YIdep 0} SmouNg ‘seqn) podiydue ueiquy
Gey WEYs 'PIOA g19}04 Au!) Yew Eqn) podydwe ‘jueiquy|
Be; Joys oWos ‘mauing deop ‘jew oqn) podiydwe ‘woiquy
OINS9018
SINSD0I8
SINS0018
iposoped ou) jew Ogn) podxdwe JojU00 u) MONG Bb)’ ued o)=10< WO WS
yidop je sdwn) Ago ewos ‘spud.0pod ‘ou; 'oqn) podiydwe 'W/s
jew oqn) podiydwe ‘ vod 0) = 40 < WO 'W/S
SINS90I8
SINSD0I8
OIN300I8
au
2 S\00 0/00
o®
o}ooojo00
3
°
i NO WW 1836/92/80
jew on) "vod oj = 30 < WO!
Wwe soA0 WO}
yus ‘vod 0) = 40 < WO
SIN300I8
SIN39018
OINS0018
DROHDHR JOR OTOBIOR aD
PNW JOAO Gey 1/043 pur So;qqod ‘pojeUdopur)
*01JNG Ose) ‘PNW 4JOAO pues pue sojnURIB ‘WS
SpIOA OWOS 'W/S ‘poyes Ayoog
WOISAHd
SINZ0018
WOISAHd
fa)
ed
yew oqn] weiquy|
170] UO PioA Auy Suoiquiy)
Jeows Odi OWOS ‘jUoIque ‘Ayo|ed Qdy
SIN30018
SINADOI8
SINS9OI8
50qn) UO S| 15 ‘Seqn) 1ydwe ~sxoes “SploA ws ‘Uod=10<WO WS
WIOM 'PLOA 10 49819 6) ‘SploA Ws ‘soqn) Iydwe ! ued 0} = Jo < WO 'W/S,
50qn) podnydwe ‘spion ‘Ws pue smouNg UeBde|sMD | Vad oO} = 10 < WO
SINSSOIS
SIN39018
SINA90I8
oOR@alnn
eclocdjco clo 0 of 8S%a00|00
ond
oojoooj000o]/000
©
©
o
nu
°
yew eqn] Buixesop "wequiy|
sMoung Ws Aue 'seqn) pue sproupAy ‘jew eqn) dn-peddu |woquy
yew eqn) dn-peddu ‘jwoiquy,
SINS9018
SIN35018
DINS9OI8
oO) ~
2 dlocd|o0d0 00/82 Boooo0o WSS JAS
oO i=] -|NO oO i=)
o
oO
ooo
yew oqn) vedo) =10< Wo WS
yoe9 Bj 8A0 Ns UO 6)|Se|9 poonpel ‘'uad 0} = 10 < WO
SPIOA pue sy9e9 ‘jew qn) dn-poddu ‘ued 0} = Jo < WO 'W/S
OINSDOI8
SINJZ0018
OIN3D018
©
Blood
re)
|
0}
|
z
x
o
°
°
cel
re9
veol
Sigal
eb pel
22est
-_o
CIO OCI CTO OC IOC OC MOCK)
oo
PrOA Buipeo} obie) Moving soqn) ydwe buiKeoop woquy
duaquy
Jew eqn) peginisip ‘4 wequy
OINJ80I8
OIN390I8
SIN39018
ooolho
oooro
c0olso8lo00
tt)
eset
0
e20|507 "ew Oqn| "Usd Oo] = 10 < WO
pNS UO spjopAy pue soqn} ' Uad Oo} = 10 < WO ‘WS
spodiydwe ‘snz0jdojoeyo | ued 0) = Jo < WO 'WWS
SINS9OIS
OIN35D0I8
OINZ9018
a) am) Cam) on) Co ol) oto) Co)!
© © oo 0 alo ® alo. 000 0 00.0 0f00 00 000 00/0 00/0 0 clo 0 doo
eeoaoc0cDaONO|O CO o]/G 0 ol/o 0 O/o oC oloool/G0 c/o 0 O|0o 0 O]o 0 o]o 00
ec 0/0 00/08 cloc ojo 0 Oloo d/o 0 Olo Oo ojoo oloc ola ao oloo ojo00
Rralolalnun allan
eceoagccoomo|0 0 co]loa0 Olo0o/9o0 D]Oo0Oj/00olo0o|GD oO o]ocoojccad
|
o|
es2
4601
BjUKUWOD
oouRgINsIG
eo8uNsS iSO
UreW XW UI eoly
“ON
Jejeweiqyseiqqng eucuieW
538
cog
arr)
96 21
brol
[‘)
S968)
C)
66 902
249 8€2
pS Zsi
eoojcco|Oono|NnoOKlO 0 O|O CO oO]o0 Ojo 0 O]ocO|OOo|OoMmMo|c oO Ojo 00
uveW ‘UN «by Ube KEW
seeuy2141 Gdy Waeddy
UW
Punoqey Xopey
‘Ul
way
SeOUXIIY1 121010 PeBpesg
useW ebuey
Uo}|e4)eueg BIEWED
xOW
810 ON POW JOTOW
8190/9 POW
xOW
(1ud) e215 UlBID jeudjsBeD9NS e\eq doy UO})_)IS
-nalw—--l—-nw-lo-ajn--l-o-
‘UI
ITNO TLS i6/S2/80
ebeis
<m9O;< DO COO CMO; CMOMOOwUAOwujcoojcoocmocoojc ag
Bic
NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex 1997
- Wis
NO Wt 1s
Mtr v0 220
MEEP 0 2Z0
Mb&b'b0 220
Mss0'+0 220
MZZO'¢0 220
ME&ZO0'¥0 220
MS¥#0'¥0 220
MO91'¥0 220
Me291t'¥0 220
M8rI'b0 220
MZ¥i 60 220
MZ¥1t ¥0 220
M62b'¥0 220
M62b'b0 220
MSc v0 220
MOE? #0 220
M8220 220
M922 60 220
Mc8S' 0 220
M86S'0 220
Ms88S $0 220
M8ev'b0 220
Mbvbr'v0 220
Mier 70 220
Msev'¥0 220
MOEP 0 220
Meer v0 220
MS1LE¥0 220
MELE 0 220
M90E 60 220
Ms0S'0 20
Msg0S'b0 220
MSOS'+0 220
ELZZI 9b IP
C6PLL OL bh
ZEOLL OL bh
9891'91
SZZ91 91
Zt ol
€6991'91
L6pce Ot
862ce 91
4t2ce ol
8289191
cledzt Ob
LZLLLb Ob
26/90/60
26/90/60
26/01/60
26/90/60
26/90/60
46/90/60
SLZ91'9t
21991 91
8ze9l Ol
S€090'91
Zv6S0'91
2679091
8892291
c6p2e Ot
82b2e 91
26891 91
28691 91
26991 91
EStZt OL
8LOZI Ot
80021 91
eZ 6172
BE VIC
10061
VN
249592
98°0S2
Gt Lee
wnuwixeyy wnwiuly) eBay
ssauyo|yt jeayew pabpag
wnwixey wnwiuiyy
uo}eauad e1BWeD
Jajaweig junoD | epo;w
sysejopny
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
v
v
€
€
2
td
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
£
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
td
€
€
€
€
€
oO
wnwixeyy WNWiUly)
(ud) ezis ujery
NO | LS
Jeuojssa2ons
MSS? ¥0 220
MIS 60 220
M8+b' v0 220
MEzb' 0 220
MZev'v0 220
M82b' v0 220
MOEP v0 220
Me2Ze 0 220
ME9E' 0 220
MsSe€'¥0 220
JGNLISNOT
26/90/60
26/90/60
26/90/60
Z8pLt OL
B6plL OL
eeplt Ol
801291
Ziiceor
L28le'9l
Zipte or
2829191
C6121 Ot
Lordi 9b
SGNLILV1 LSATIVNV SWIL
26/90/60
26/90/60
26/90/60
26/90/60
26/90/60
scnonnovla nolan olan ojnnosvnodvisnndvscon ojsnHosnH cCcVvAgTH o0oVpcoH oO
‘day uones
EPIOA ‘yew aqny dn-paddu ‘seaws Jedim ‘ywy/s ‘ued<wp
WG 0} Sajyejnoied pazipiny)‘4p/M payyul MONG By'A !yWy/S ‘uad<wp
W/S ‘ued<wp
CYIGEP Je SPIOA DUIP|S} JIja1.jBLW Sqn) eosijaduiy GN-peddu .WW/S.ued<wp
Jadim Aq paseaws Gd ‘yidap je spioa Hulpeay ‘y;/s ‘ued<wp
uydap ye spion Buipaa; ‘saqny pns!syoejpe sadim Yq !;W/S!ued<wp
SPIOA Buipaa} !yw/S ‘ued<wp ‘uadiano
goueyjow ‘Huyeaws Jadim "W/S ‘uad<wip
uede-|jnd 10 spion Buipasy jo!}a1 6) Auan‘pues 4q uly) 19A0 JSejoPNW Jadim:W/S!uad<wp
ujdap ye spion Buipeay 6)!ywys ‘ued<wp !uediaao
uadsano ‘mowing !syeeds JedIM ‘Wy/S ‘uad<wp
uidep wag L!oL ye Spion Buipag; 6) yew aqn) podiydwiy dn-peddu ‘aus ‘uad<wp
Jeuolsoia 'Zu\dep ye spion Buipaa) yew aqny dn-peddu 'w/s ‘uad<wp
JEUOISOID !{hHD 'ZPIOA ‘ws‘u\dep Wd G-p SWIOM !W/S uly) ‘uad<wp
éumop-Beip‘yew aqn) eostjadwiy dn-paddu ‘qqy uly) ‘W/s ‘ued<wp
Pion Buipaay jul ‘pNs uo syool~g ‘Buiyeays Jedim ‘yy/S ‘uad<wip
Ell OY ‘wW90| ~PloA Buipaa) !;6uiyeasys sadim ‘uad<wp
Moding pau !S ul Be] jays ‘(Aejo 4q) W/S ‘ued<wp
yewaqn eosijadwy dn-paddu ‘Be| jays 'syoos ';uad<qdy ‘ued<wp
uidap ye gaunyoesy 10 SpioA Bulpaay ‘yew aqny dn-paddi ‘6e| jjaus ‘;w/S ‘ued<wp
I] O4J0y ‘yew eqn) dn-paddu ‘qqy Ayoyed pue uly) ‘ued<wp
ploa Buipeay ‘seqn) Ns ‘yNs UO Sugapy/janeibDpjoNg ‘ued<qyy ‘Ued<wp ‘ued mojjeUs
SpIOA Bulpag) !syew aqn) podiydwey oAjod ‘6x jays ‘;W/S ‘ued<wp
aqn) eosijadwiy dn-peddu ‘;6uuaews sedim ‘uad<wp
ujdap ye spion Buipaay EyewW eqnidn-peddu ‘uad<wp
Gd Juies/Ayojyed ‘yew aqny dn-paddu ‘!ujdap ye swuo0m zZ:W/S‘!uad<wp
JEuo!Isole ‘NODS Ns !{seqny ‘Ajod Jo podiydwe ‘qq pauniq:uiyy ‘W/S ‘ued<wp
WOISAHd
SINADOIE
OINSDOId
OINSDOId
LS0NI
WOISAHd
LAGNI
SINSDOI8
LAGNI
LAGNI
LAQNI
AWOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
OINSDOI8
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
AWOISAHd
LAGNI
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
AWOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
AWOISAHd
WG WOM Uy) eWegn) podiydwe dn-paddueaws 1edim'W/S ‘ued<wip
JEW aqn) ‘ZjoRjIWe JadIM ‘yy/S ‘uad<wp
yew aqn) podiydwe dn-paddu !yw/s ‘uad<wp
éplon Buipaay ew aqny eosijadwiy dn-peddu 'w/s 'uad<wp
yew aqny dn paddi !‘qdy Ayayed'sjoeyiue sadim ‘W/s ‘ued<wp
yew aqn) Uns ‘wo 0|-Gz"Z WOM ‘Wy/S ‘ued<wp
WOISAHd
OINADOIE
OINADOIE
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
OINSDOI8
yew) dn-paddi jisodap Be] nods oeje Jadim ‘WS ‘uad<uip
SPIOA Hulpad} ‘joeje ysejd Jadim !yy/S ‘ued<wp
EPIOA Buipaa; 6 ‘6e) 1noos ‘(Aejo 4q)W/S ‘ued<wp
SPIOA Buipady ‘syewaqn, eosiedwiy ‘be] (joys :W/S .ued<wp
SPIOA Bulpag) ‘yew eqn) dn-paddu ‘w/s ‘ued<wp
ujdap je pion Buipaa; 6} ‘syew eqn) dn-paddu ‘uad<wp
punojBbpiey ‘uadiepun
PIOA Buipaas yew eqn) podiudwy joes pe sedim ‘w/S ‘ued<wp
syoejipe adim ‘W/S ‘uad<wp
SPIOA Buipady ‘jays Ws !seqny yns ‘ued<wp
sjusuiw09
ON
SSA
ON
oa
MO}
WOISAHd
AWOISAHd
WOISAHd
ooogqooooqooeoo
pO og;j0 Cc 990/000
ooojopooqjcco0o
oo
bs Ge
to
o
s)
=
I)
cy
o
ojooogjoccgqaocoococoose
1SGNI
WOISAHd
OINJDOIE
~ LAQNI
OINSDOI
13QNI
SINADOIE
aoueqinysig| junoD
eoeyNs} oueyjoW
[ pocpccdeoseeseescoeseceedeadecdeesedecedoos
WNWIxeyW) WNWIUIW eely
ssouyo|4yl Ody Juaeddy
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6:
19°
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ooojorcoo0qroceqqoo
ooojocoooqooqcoeo
ueew ‘xeW ‘UN
punoqgey xopay
‘day uoners
Bld
NL-91 and D/S Mound Complex 1998
0
6S tL
80°21
es 2k
90°21
Brel
S6
BL bE
Gel
9S PL
eZel
rar §
tes
92 €
99'EL
£08
a)
60S
led
BE el
€¢6
Lan §
OLSE
Zeyh
9EL
Ver
206
€2'Sh
SSL
ce el
S66
St pL
cé St
eel
ee2h
1o9r
el bb
eB tt
90'SI
ueaw
0
60°21
26h
eget
was
€or
OL
63°21
ep bl
240°St
20'S
6921
£26
esp
86°EL
6S'8
esz
£09
1€°8
66°c1
SL6
66°ch
el St
el pt
S6 EL
6S 21
6
cool
ce ol
8Lel
gett
20'St
28°91
86'EL
8e'EL
ZE9L
z0'St
69'c!
2g'°Sh
0
PEL
Zo°St
6E Lt
108
so0
St6
96
69°21
Z0t
eVet
661
289
4
ee el
cel
S6'P
cvy
ce9
68th
S16
60!
ep pt
90°2
82 et
SZOL
998
60°21
8S'hl
SLeL
so'0
601
6621
€or
6y th
pe bt
Or 2
vob
80'rL
0
bo7eol
pO Ere
EGLL
vl BEC
PEL
€€ Ze
89°9S1
€+ eet
ep p07
242-c6t
Edt
ee ptt
veSp
20261
60 2b
S88
6E 12
sO'cOl
6 cL
co EL
98021
20'eL2e
+2002
9E°261
2 89l
921
60le
Br Lic
eS 98t
pO sel
98002
6r 1272
2S pet
beect
6S 222
22902
Ze 991
be bte
wnwixeyy wnwitiy) eay
SsauyoiyL ieayey) pabpaiq
£0'8t
68 bt
9S 2b
pp cl
90°21
8irL
896
POLL
es er
el eb
SE Pl
pS ck
brs
eee
es eb
LL
919
Ses
ped
pr cl
e€s6
26 tt
est
SO'rL
IS'eL
eo ll
806
SB rl
Sysl
99'€L
yS6
€0' FL
86 FL
tpel
ppel
ZO 91
sort
661
€8'rh
ueay
19°0
90
89'€
622
69'L
so
s9'0
662
621
601
ard
90
c6 2%
602
so
960
Sc
OL
L Zan
6b L
SPO
pak
S60
sZo
9S'0
bel
sso
bye
Zan
s90
69'€
68}
see
vet
691
80
sso
6b tL
6e'l
ebuey wnwixeyy wnwiuiy
uojjesjouad essed
ee'8
6hel
y6L
8s'el
te Zt
ey yl
OL
rset
er yt
Zot
erst
Peet
S26
Ser
80'FI
6S°8
cr
42S
e8
coe
SL6
y8'ct
LLS1
€0'St
62 EL
6S'2L
SE6
20°91
ce'ob
86 EL
BE tL
86'rt
c6 Ot
£0'F1L
82 el
dp ol
£6 FL
6S’ cl
2p'st
eL dt
6S Lh
eL st
62 bb
2e9L
€6€1
Se6
SS6
y9cl
8t Pt
8c el
beck
469
6272
8S et
€o2
6
ely
4g9
pete
e6
Ht
ee rl
82 FL
ec et
S90
188
e9 El
8S'Fh
ee el
692
80'EL
eco et
6ZeL
6S Lh
LOSI
BE FL
6E LL
gt yl
Ga
=
ooooo0coo0oo0coocoo0o°0comooce
o
OL
ooooocoo0oo0ooco0o0coco0o0o0c0c°0c°oco°ceo
Jajaweig
sysejopny| solew
oeooooc0eocecococccoococoCcCcCCcCCONcDCOCCCOCCcCCcCoCoOrCoOSo
wunoD | spoy, = wnwixeyy wnwiuly
(1ud) ezis ujesD
p<
COP
p<
p<
p<
p<
coy
€OPF
p<
p<
p<
p<
£Op
EOP
EOP
COP
p<
Zoe
COP
CP
p<
EOP
£Op
EVP
EOP
EOP
EOP
p<
EOF
r<
EOP
ZOE
£OP
COP
ep
£%P
EF
cp
£oOP
NUNNNUNNNKNANDNDNANNDYDNYNNINNUNK NDMYNNNNMNMNNANNTNMNYNNOD
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
ps
P<
ps
ps
p<
p<
P<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
<
P<
p<
p<
p<
p<
ys
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
p<
M690 +0 220
Mpv80 v0 220
M?60 b0 220
M6Zt 60 220
MS9}t'0 220
M0910 220
M6rPr 0 2240
M8PP 0 2L0
MtSp 0 220
M822 b0 220
M822 v0 220
MOE F0 220
M6ZS v0 240
MZ6S 0 220
M96S +0 220
Mbcer v0 220
MEE’ 40 220
M6rr'b0 220
M8bP'b0 220
M2prP'b0 220
MOPr 0 220
M662 ¥0 220
Mv62 ¥0 220
M862 'b0 220
Mc8v v0 220
MS1tS'b0 220
MdZe2S'¥0 220
M8EPr 0 220
MBE 0 220
M6EPr v0 220
Mte€v 0 220
MObP 40 220
MZbP ¥0 220
MZ8E ’0 220
MI8E b0 220
MZZE v0 220
M6rr ¥0 220
MZ¢P v0 220
Mbp 0 220
iT NO 1 1S
WeNO WLS
Wis
IWNO TLS
WT NO Wis
TNO 11s
NO WLS
WNO WLS
TNO We Ls
INO WLS
NO WLS
Jeuojssa99nS| AGNLIDNOT
NOSt'9L
Ne@St 9b
Npol ot
NOZL' 9b
NO9-'9L
NS9L 91
N8cE'9t
N6ce'9}
Neee ot
N691 91
NS9L'9OL
Ni9t 9b
NS9L OL
Nc9L9L
NOZL'9L
NZp0'9L
NZSO'91
N-90°91
Npee ol
Ni@e'91
N6Z2'91
Negl ot
NZ91L'9L
NIZtL‘OL
NZZ1 9b
NS9L'9L
NeZt ot
NG6II OL
NOcI'9t
NOd!'9L
NZee9oL
NZt2'9L
NILE? OL
N991'91
N99L'9L
NOZL'9t
Npol ot
NZ9L'9L
NZ9t'9t
ly
4
by
IY
4
bP
IP
ty
Ip
Ip
bp
Ip
Ly
IP
Ly
IP
ip
ly
by
le
bp
ly
LP
tp
lp
IP
lp
bP
IP
bY
ty
IP
bp
Ip
by
bb
IP
Ip
tp
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
S1H
SOW
SOW
SH
SIH
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
S1H
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
S1H
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
SOW
chek
beech
Lp:ct
Ope
Sp2h
Spel
vel
evel
60'E1
80:EL
LOE
Sv8
ZEEL
ZE-EL
ers
cv'B
OL-PL
OS:Eb
6reL
8PeL
PEEL
PLet
Ebel
6S'8
cb-EL
Of:€L
SO: 1
v0:F1
v0:F1
S06
LS‘€b
PS:eL
6Le
6L-EL
SL-eL
€c:el
JONLILV1 LSAIWNVY SWIL
86/10/80
86/0€/20
86/08/20
86/08/20
86/0€/20
86/0€/20
86/0€/20
86/08/20
86/0€/20
86/0€/L0
96/06/20
86/0£/20
86/10/80
86/0£/20
86/0£/20
86/10/80
86/10/80
86/0£/20
86/06/20
86/06/20
86/08/20
86/0€/20
86/0€/20
86/06/20
86/10/80
86/06/20
86/06/20
86/0€/2Z0
86/0€/20
86/0€/20
96/10/80
86/0€/20
86/0€/20
86/08/20
86/08/20
86/0€/L0
86/08/20
86/08/20
86/06/20
aed
3400SSaQ
300SSa
300SSa
300rSa
300rSG
300rSa
NOOeSa
Nooesa
Nooesa
300esa
300€Sa
300eSsa
Mo0¢zSa
Mo0¢csa
Mo0zesa
so00csa
so0csa
soo¢sa
NoOozsSa
Noozsa
Noozsa
300¢Sa
300¢Sa
300¢Sa
MO0lLSQ
MO0lLSG
MO01SG
s$o0lsa
sootsd
soolsa
Noo1sa
NoOoLSG
NoO-LSG
3001SG
5001S
5001SG
YLNOSG
YINOSG
YINOSG
<mOodcmocoomtcmaortoOuUmtcmMOoOCMOOCOWMOACMAOCONOMCAOCIOW
‘day uoneis
s/d
s/a
s/d
s/d
s/d
s/d
s/d
s/a
s/a
s/a
s/a
s/a
s/d
s/d
s/d
s/a
s/d
s/d
s/a
s/a
s/d
s/a
s/d
s/d
s/d
s/d
s/d
s/a
s/d
s/d
s/d
s/d
s/a
s/d
s/a
s/d
ealy ‘Jay
jpunow
"WHOM "SCION ONI0334 IV SENL di Oaddid GNN NAS O38 OKI INS SAV
"SMOYYNG “LSGIOA ‘S1V1S GOdIHd WW Ol¥30000d ‘O31HOS GOW 'd<Wa
“OVE T13HS ‘SMOYHNE 'LSGIOA “LVN3IENL dN-O3ddly 'O31LHOS GOW ‘ONWS ‘d<Wa)
'Z © WHOM ‘IVN38NL dN-G3ddll ‘031HOS GON 'HV3NS Y3dIM ‘d<WO
"SNY31LdO13VHO “MOUHNA ‘LGIOA ‘LVWAENL dN-G3ddlY 'G31NOS 114M 'HWSNS Y3dIM 'd<W0
: ‘LQ3UNOOS ‘O31LYOS 113M ‘d<WG)
"LOAUNODS "LSMOUYNG 'O31LHOS AIYOOd '1SV19 3d IM ‘ONWS ‘NW G10ANO ‘d<Wa
AUVONNOB GNWS @ ONIL Vd 'H1d30 8 HSVH 113HS 'MOUUNGE 'O31HOS ATNOOd '1SV19 Y3dIM'ONHWS ‘NO O10/NO ‘d<WO
‘SOEs TNSHS 'S3BNL'O3LYOS ATNOOd 'ONWS ‘LANY HO d<Wa
“MOYYNG 'LGIOA 191734 ‘031YOS COW ‘1s¥19 Y3dIM ‘ONS ‘d<WO
“OVIENODS ‘SOVYS 113HS 'ONINSdO MOYYNG 'O31HOS GOW ‘ONFVS 'd< WG!
“OVIENOOS 'MOWYNG 'LVNSENL di G3addIy ‘OSLYOS GOW 'GNHWS 'ONIN3AWT WO ‘d<iG)
‘SGIOQUAH 'S3ENL VOSNAGHY ‘031NOS GOW ‘ONS 'N3d<NG
‘AO!NB 'OAYNOOS 'STISHS "LOIOA 'SLVW38NL dN-O3ddi¥ ‘031LNOS AVHOOd ‘d<iid)
‘SOVUI TN3HS 'SGIONGAH 'SGIOA 'G31LHOS ATHOOd ‘GNW/S ‘WO QIOMG ‘d<WG}
"SNIHOWN 3AI1 2'OV1 173HS'NMOG: OVYG HO MOUUNG ‘'SCIOA 219173¥ 'SLVWAENL 'N3d<NG)
“LWW38NL 'ONWS 'O3S 910157NS 'N3d<Wa
*$31883d 'G3YNODS 'SGIOUGAH ‘SOIOA ‘O3LYOS A1UOOd 'NA Q1OANO ‘d<WG)
“OV1113HS ‘SMOUUNE 'LIGVYOOYL3Y '031NOS ATNOOd ‘ONWS ‘WO Q10MN0 ‘d<WO}
*SQIOWOAH 'O31NOS AITHOOd ‘WO O10ANO 'd<WO)
“MOYYNG 'SHTVLS GOdIHdHV ‘O3LUOS A1HOOd ‘ONWS 'NO Q10ANG ‘d<WiG}
AYNS B STI3HS ‘OVIENODS 'Z © STI3HS ‘GIOA ‘O31NOS GOW 'ONWS ‘LONINSAV7 WO "d<WO
“SOVUI TI3HS 'SOIOUOAH ‘MOWUNG ‘GIOA '031NOS GOW ‘ans ‘dna
"SOVU4 173HS 'WHOM 'SGIOA ‘LVNV3ENL dN-G3ddiy ‘0310S GOW “Onyvs ‘d<ng)
*SOIOUGAH ‘LSGIOA ‘LVW3ENL dN-O3ddI¥ ‘ONWS ‘N3d<NQ|
‘QIOWOAH 'LVN3ENL ‘O3LUOS AIWOOd ‘NWS 'WO G10 ‘d<WO
"SOVUS TN3HS 'SNLIH130 OYO 'SMOUUNG ‘O31HOS AITNOOd 'LONINSAVI WO ‘d<WG
"SMOUUNG 'SGOdIHdNY WS 'G3LHOS GOW 'S1SV19 H3diM ‘WO O10 "d<NO)
BYNLOVYs'NYOM’SMOHUNG 'SLVW JEN GOdIHdiv'G3LNOS GOW ‘'ISW19 Y3d M'NO C10ANO ‘d<WO
"SMOHHNG ‘LV 3ENL dN G3ddid VOSI3dNY ‘O3LUOS GOW ‘WS 'NO GION ‘d<NO}
"MOUYUNE 'LSOIOA 'S3ENL VOSA ‘GNWWS 'N3d<WO
‘O3LYOS A1YOOd 'GNHWS ‘WO GION ‘d<(S)NO
"SOVU4 TI3HS 'O3LYOS ATHOOd 'ONWS ‘NO G10M0 ‘d<WO
"SQIOHOAH 'LSMOUHNG 'G3LYOS AIYOOd ‘NWS 'NO O1ONO “d<WO
‘WHOM 'OIOA 'O3LHOS ATYOOd '1SV19 H3dIM ‘GNWS ‘WO GION 'd<WO}
"SMOYHNB ‘OF1NOS AIHOOd ‘ONWS ‘WO G1ONG ‘<a
*LO3IYNOOS 'SOVHS TNSHS 'SNLINL30 OHO 'OFLYOS AIUOOd ‘EVANS Y3dIM CNW ‘Wd 010M0 ‘d<NO!
“dW1X3 Od "SOIOUGAH 'CSCIOA '031NOS ATHOOd 'HV3NS 3d ‘ONWWS 'WO G10/Nd ‘d< Wa
"SQIONOAH 'LWN38NL df-O3ddIy 'O3LUOS ATHOOd ‘ONS ‘WO QIOMNO ‘d<WO
sjuawwog
ON|O
ON|O
ONjO
ONjO
ON|O
ON/O
ON|H8'2
ON|Z+'9
ONjO
ON|O
ON|O
ON|O
ONjO
ON/O
ON|Z9'S
ON|O
ONjO
ON|O
ON|Z7'9
ON/Z1'8
ON|80'€
ONjO
ON/O
ONjO
ON/O
ON/2 6
ON|€8'€
ON|PE 2?
ON|EZ €
ON|68'2
ONjO
ON|se6
ON}908
ON|PI 2b
ON|S2 01
ON}II 8
ON/Z9S
ON}9I 2
ON|9F 8
oa
M07 | (9)
WOQVON
WGGVON
WGGVON
WdavoNn
WGGVON
WOQVON
WO M3N 4O SSANHOIHL XV
WO MAN JO SSSNHOIHL XV
WOQVON
WGGVON
WaGVON
WOGVON
WGQVON;
WOGVON
WG MSN 40 SSSNHOIHL XV)
WOGVON
WOGVON
WOGVON
WO MAN 4O SS3NNDIHL XVI
Wd M3N J4O SS3NXOIHL XV
WG M4N SO SSANHOIHL XVIN
WGGVON|
WOQVON
WOGVON
WOGVON
WO M3N JO SS3NNOIHL XW
Wd M3N 4O SSANHOIHL XV
WO M3N 4O SSANMOIHL XV
WO M3N 40 SSSNHOIHL XV,
WO M3N JO SSSNHOIHL XV
WOOVON
WG M4N 4O SSSNMOIHL XV
Wd MAN 4O SS3NHOIHL XV
WO M3N JO SSANHOIHL XVI
WO M3N 40 SSANHOIHL XV
WG M3N 3O SS3NHOIHL
WO M3N 40 SSANHOIHL XVW
Wd MAN 4O SSSNHOIHL XV
Wd M3N 40 SS3NMOIHL XV
sjueWaINSe a |eUOHIPpy|
SINSDOI8 (") 6 2492
OIN39OI8) oO 2 12:4
TWOISAHd 0 Z jeee
TWOISAHd 0 € jee
TWOISAHd| () 9 «8st
TWOISAHd t) fe 180
TWOISAHd: ) th jeer
WOISAHd 0 2 |ss9
OIN3SDOI8 ) bh eso
WOISAHd 1) b jest
WOISAHd ) € 820
TWOISAHd) C1) € j980
OIN3SD018} t') 6 jer
WOISAHd 0 6 jeo2
OINS9O18 oO tb [98%
130NI 0 as
130NI 0 SG {Zeb
TWOISAHd| t) Mh |S6%
WOISAHd 0 S 602
SIN3DOI8) tt) 8 |Se
OIN3DOI8 oO 6 bre
TWOISAHd| ) OL jee
OINS9OI8: 0 Ol jPo'e
WOISAHd t) ok j2Z9€
OIN39018) t') 8 jest
OIN3DO18} 0 4h {29s
TWOISAHd 0 6 |s2
TWOISAHd ) 2 S2%
SINJDOI8} 0 9 [et
WOISAHd 0 8 ize
OIN39018 ) 9 |ZS4
TWOISAHd ) 8 |s6e1
WOISAHd: () iS 692
OINSDO18 0 @ {Peo
OINJ9O18} 0 Lien 74
SIN39O18 0 6 Le
WOISAHd ty) 2 jsee
OIN39OI8| t) 6 j9ze
OINSDO18} ) 8 [62
eoueqin}sig] juNoD ueay
eoepns| eueyioW [ISO
are 464 6862E EL PLE SPS 5]
209 so 291 8b |0 1) i) -2)
4) 4o t2eeh [0 oO VY) Vv
664 sro evs |0 tt) tt) xe)
yl] sso S602 |0 oO 1) 8
4 20 VN 0 tt) t) Vv
tos 684 @z9 {0 0 0 52)
Sto vee 4S6'r8 |0 oO 0 3]
We ere 268 |0 1) ) Vv
coe soo seed |0 0 0 co)
62h zo isis jo ty) te) 8
rob soo Spo tb jo oO i) Vv
Vo 492 48€'8S |0 ) 0 a
ele sro 6S PE [0 CY) 0 re)
4:3) vee 6S1°99 |0 t) (1) i]
ase 460 9202 |0 0 0 J
ere gO €€9'64 10 () 1) a
LoS Bly €v6'89 |0 O 1) 52)
raat) zo Z6€ LE |O ) tt) ce)
Gy 4 VN 0 (1) ti) a
ees 20 466 ¥2 |0 0 0 v
9 gO VN 10 0 1) °
429 bo eb 22 (0 te) 0 8
aus 694 ve0 0S |0 i) oO Vv
182 9r0 ZB6 42 [0 tC) 1) 3
6 BIe ¥81 92 jO t) t) 2)
v so VN 10 0 ) Vv
Ley vO VN i) i) i) te)
9 so VN 0 1) CY) i?)
2e9 vet S62 6P |0 oO oO Vv
9sz2 4€0 €LE 22 jO0 i) ) a
eer 604 91864 [0 ty) t) °
les soo 2E8 2E [0 (1) t\) Vv
ol vee 22°48 {0 0 tt) 3
se ol Ber 26266 |0 i) Y) 8
902 681 40S €9 [0 () t) Vv
489 eo ¥S2 22 |0 i) VY) ce)
799 sz0 e2orZt jO to) tv) 8
Vor 49S 69°80! |O oO oO Vv
WNWIXeWy WNWIU|W Beny = fueeyy “xe UW
$80UH9/41 Gd jUqieddy| punoqey xopey
300SSG S/d
300ssa s/a
300SSQ s/a
300rSG s/d
300rSsa s/d
300%Sd s/q)
Nooesa s/q)
Nooesa s/q|
Nooesa s/d
300eSa S/d
300eSa sd
300eSG [fe]
Moo02sa sd
Mo00zsa sd
M00¢Sa s/g|
soozsa s/qi
sooesgd s/a
sooesd s/q|
Nooesa s/d
Noozsa sid
Noozsa s/d
300¢sa s/Q)
3002SG s/d
300e¢sa s/g)
MO001SG Ze)
MO001SG s/q)
MO01SG s/d
s$o0o01sa sd
s$oolsa sq
s$o0o1sa sd
Noolsa sa
Noolsa sd
Nooisa s/d
3001SG s/q|
300'Sa s/a
3001SG S/d,
Y1INOSG s/q)
YINOSO sid
YLNOSG sid
Boy JOH
uonms — /PUNOW.
B2
USCGA Mound 1995
Caxodhy “jew eqn) deaws Jadim ued O}=J0<WO WS
SISEP Jadim 'LaxodAy ‘ew eqn) dn-paddu ‘udap ‘vad 0) = 10 < Wa
“ung ‘Axo daap uy) :seqn) podjydwe ‘ued 0) = 40 < WO ‘ws
ON
S3A
OIN39018
SINSSOI8 ~GNI
SINADOI8 GNI
ooo
IWHO "HOdes 30) INTHd "WO 219 pue Aep Aypjed ‘pas "vad 0) = 10 < WO
yew eqn) podjydwe ‘ued 0) = 40 < WO ‘WS
seqn poddue iued 0) = 10 < WO ‘WS
yew eam dn- -paddy ! ‘ued > WO ‘WS,
Jew qn) BujAeoap ‘2 jua|qwe ye] JMO} ‘WS
peddp Sued 0) 50 < Wa ‘WwS
yee) WO 2 ‘ued 0) = 10 < WO ‘WS
“PAS UO sqeso yuUaY :Le|xodAy ‘jew eqn) dn-paddy !'uad 0} = Jo < Wa
judwe ‘ved uj uad <Qdy /uad oO}
yew eqn) podiydwe ‘ued 0) = 40 < WO ‘WS
UMop-Besp ‘Jew eqn) podjydwe :'uad 0} = 40 < WO ‘WS
ap -uad 0) =10<WO WS
SP{OA Auj) 'saqn) ‘ya) UO eave “ws U) AJUO Qqy !Uad 0) = 10 < WO ‘WS
SP{OA Ou ‘ung daap d)/94 ‘Be; ays ‘ew eqn) ‘'Uad 0} = J0 < WO ‘WS
=10<Wo WS
PIOA “WS ‘Ssesbjaa :Be) JOYS Jew eqn)
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
SIN39OI8
OIN39O18
OIN39O18
OINSSOI8
OIN35018
QIN39OI8
OINSSOI8
OIN39018
SIN3DO18
OIN39018
SIN3SOI8
OIN390I8
SINZ9018
SIN395018
OIN39O18
Se
So
0y=10< WO WS
yew eqn) podiydwe dn-paddja ‘uad 0) = 40 < Wa ‘WS
“V.UO UO}2AB|@ UO “pu AyYeay Maj e ‘yew Gn) BujAedap ‘'Uad 0} = JO < WO
JEAWS PU "p JOM ew eqn) dn-peddu "Maung "WS ‘Ludep Or WG
Be| (1ays ‘yew eqn) dn-paddu ‘ydap 0) Wa ‘WS
Jew eqn) podiudwe dn-paddy ‘ade} enig wep jo eseq 1 WG ‘WS
Be) ays yew eqn) payng - ued o)
6e) jays ‘'uad 0) = 30 < WO‘WS
‘uad 0) = 40 < WO ‘WS
PAW JO WON0G OF WG ‘ZsweAe Woe WS
Spejpye sada !uad 0) = 10 < WO ‘WIS
SP{OA OU :saqny podjydwe ‘usd 0} = 410 < WO ‘WS
dn-peddp vad 0) = 40 < WO WS
Ae} 1ays ‘sMaung ‘jew eqn) dn-paddy !'uad 0) = 40 < Wa‘Wws
2e)xodAy ‘yew eqn) podjydwe dn-padd
Be jays owos jew aqm podjydwe dn-peddt
=10<Wao WS
yew aqn) yede-poddt
SPIOA OU 1G Uidap 0) MONG ‘Wake| eng
“Pas pa|yow “jew eqn)
ad 0) = JO < WO ‘WS
ad 0) =10< Wa WS
LSIUBAB WCW [2J9A9S “'Uad 0) = JO < WO ‘WS
Ge] nays BwWOS ‘ew eqn) dn-paddu :zstaAe] WO Z /Uad 0) = 10 < Wa ‘Wws
ON
S3A
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
SINSSOI8
SINA9018
SIN39O18
SIN39018
SINS90I8
OINS90I8
OIN39018
OIN39018
SIN39018
JINADOI8
SIN39018
9IN3S018
SIN35018
OINS9O18
SINS9OI8
SINS9O18
SIN3SO18
OINS9O18
cSS'Sb
SS20b
68
v<
v<
er
<
v<
ENy
¥<
EOP
<
WW 1SS6/S7e0
11S $6/Sz/e0
ILS $6/S7/80
INO I 1SS6/Sz780
| NO I 4Sse/sz/eo
{INO 11S S8/sz/e0
v<
v<
w<
M_NO Il_LSs/s2/e0
) 1896/57/80
=J0<Wa WS’
Udap ‘vad 0) = 30 < WO ‘WS
spejye sadim ‘Be) ays ‘Lyidap 0) Qgy !Uad 0} = 10 < wa
oy
ON
ON
ON
OG esueqnisig
SINS9O18
SIN39018
‘WOISAHd
eoepns
LS] oe ae @ ofo 5 <jn oo
eoaecodolcoojcoo|o co ojo oO o]o Oo o]lo0 Oloco colo co colo colo o
oogcoojcocojococjococojcoocjcocloo ojo co o]oo cloooloo
oe
ere 18
26201
S6r el
69L €£
7a:)
86r 82
v<
v<
b<
<
EY
HINO 11S $6/Sz/80
8)2UjUUa)3pU) = GNI
I LSS8/Sz77e0
I 1s s6/sz7e0
11S $8/Sz/80
WW 1S s6/sz7/e0
4186/97/80
1$S6/Sz7/80
1S $6/S7/80
Ls se/sze0
WLS S8/Sz/80
iis seezeo
4s seezreo
I isseezeo
W1sse/sz7eo
ILS 56/57/80
1S S6/S2Z/80
I Ls s6/sz/eo
i LSS6/Sz/e0
I 1856/52/80
NO Il 1SS6/Sz/80
1S S6/Sz/80
I Lsse/sze0
ILS S8/S7/80
WW Ls se/sz7e0
WLS S6/Sz7/80
<OOC OO CMO; CMO COO cMOOjcOoOicmO/coOo]/cemVoicooicnoicoo
“xeW UIN COlY “ON UeOW
Jojewelqsejqqng eueyeW —_—-SSOUXD1NL Ady Juoleddy
eay
SSeUNdIYL [euEleW pebpag
uojejeueg eee)
‘ON epoW
SISEID PNW JOfeW (14d) ezjS UjeEIN jeUO|sseDoNS
e6eIS
eed
dey uoneis
B3a
NL-94 Mound 1995
S)EUIULA)8pu) = GNI
OINS9OIS $0 6 j i TE eb 0 I 1S Se/S2/80
yee Jadim ‘saqn) podiydwe Bukesap ‘ssake] Wa plo :uad 0) = 40 < Wa
Be} |jays ewWos ‘}ewW eqn) podiydwe ‘vad 0) = Jo < Wa 9INa9012 1 i i NO WT 1S Se/szg0
[JEWS SPIOA ‘yew aqn) podjydwe ‘uad 0} = Jo < wa OSINS9OI8 jl i! i i lI NO_I 1S s6/sz/80
eens paqinjsip ‘Aynjed Gdy !'uad 0) = JO < WG OINS9OI8 i i i i il il 1S $6/SZ/80
yoeje seaws Jedim ‘deo pues ou !yew aqn) !'uad 0} = 0 < WO OINSD01I8 i i it i i INO I 1S S6/Sz/e0
jew eqn) podjydwe esuep ‘ued = Jo <~wa ‘Wa S! pnw ‘WIS SINa901I8 ; j i i INO ILS $6/Sz/80
yew eqn) podiydwe esuap ‘ued 0) = Jo < Wa ‘W/S' SINS9OI8 i H i lil NO Il 1S S6/SZ/80
6e| ||oys eWOSs ‘'Uad 0) = JO < WG OINa9018 ; i q 4 INO WLS Se/Sz/80
yew aqn) podiydwe esuap ‘ued 0} = JO < WG ‘WISI 9INa901a : p ft P INO LS se/sz/e0
UjGap je PIOA BH} ‘Gd uly) ‘A !'Uad 0} = JO < WO) SINSDOIg : i 5 i i i } i il NO li 1S S6/Sz7/80
yew eqn) podiydwe dn-paddu ‘ujdap ‘uad 0) = 10 < Wa 9SINa90Ia i P ; f NO IT LS S6/Sz/80
spion Buipaay Auew ‘Be; jays awos ‘yew aqn) podiydwe !'uad 0} = JO < waj OINSDOI8 i i UNO _I_1S S6/sz/80
Be} ays ewos ‘yew eqn) podiydwe 'uad 0} = 10 < Wa
Ge; jays ‘Aoyjed GQdy !'uad 0} = JO< Wa
yew eqn) podiydwe ‘Ayojed pgy ‘'uad 0) = JO < WG
IOP NS JO YONW UO WI Q ‘UILN A Gd¥ ‘'Uad 0} = JO < WO
2°0'G Mo} ‘saqn) podjydwe BuAedep ‘!pajjow !'uad 0) = Jo < Wa
pnw peonped + Aejo AevB pajow ‘yew eqn) podiydwe ‘ued 0} = Jo< Wa
yidep uojesjeued 0) = Jo < WO
(dit) udap ye spioa “By ‘yew eqn) podiydwe ‘ued 0) = Jo < Wa
yew eqn) podiydwe ‘yjdap ‘uad 0) = so < Wa
uidap uonesjauad 0} = 10 < Wd ‘WIS
OINS9O18 bre bE i A i i 1S $6/Sz/80
WOISAHd SSP OL i F i i TNO TLS se/sz/eo
OINS9OI8 i bab be i q i i : f : lI NO_I_LS $6/Sz/a0
SHA SINS9OI8 i i i i 1S $6/Sz/80
ON ‘WOISAHd . WITNO I 4S s6/Sz/80
ON __9INASOI8 i j i ; i : i i i i i WI NO“ ILS $6/97/80
SINSSO1a i i ; j INO W 1S Se/9z/80
SINSDO18 i ‘ ‘ 3 i TNO ILS s6/Sze0
OINS9018 i i i | NO Il 1S s6/Sz/80
OINS9SOI i j ; i ‘ I NO HN 1S S6/92/80
yew eqn) podiydwe dn-paddiy OSINS90I8 i i i ILS $6/Sz/80
(11 “ABp-18M ‘WHOM “By ‘PIA DISSE}9) WOdas JO) INIYd ‘Jew eqn) esuap | SI SINS9O0I8 i i . R i i NO ILS S6/Sz/80
yeW eqn) podiydwe BulAedap ‘juaiqwe s! pnw ‘yw/s SINSSOIS R i i il i i L$ $6/92/80
yew eqn) podjydwe Bukeoap ‘usd 0} = Jo < WG ‘W/S| OINa901Ia ; § ; INO I! LS S6/9z/80
BurAeoap jew aqny podiydwe ‘yuaiqwe s} pnw ‘ys SINZ901I8 i ; i ‘ INO WLS S6/Sz/80
saqny podjydwe Bulkesap ‘juaiquwe si pnw ‘WiS} SINSD0I8 i ‘ i i i i i 1S se/Sz/80
Bulyos Jood ‘jew eqn) BulAevap ‘Ws ‘Zjuaiquiy’ SIN3Z901I8 fi i H i il NO tl LS $6/S7/80
yew JAPUN dUge} JayJays ‘;Wy/S ‘jUa|quiy OINSDOI8 i i i k ILS $6/Sz/80
SMOUNG 'W/S Lualquy| SINaD019 ; i i ‘ ‘ i i i NOH 4S $6/Sz7/80
EME-|[N JO OBIE Qdy ‘yew eqn) HusAeo~ap ‘zyuaIquiy SINSDOI8 ; i P ; ll 1$ 96/92/80
yew eqn) podiydwe dn-paddu !'uad 0) = 10 < Wa ‘W/S| OINSDOI8 i " INO ILS s6/Sz80
yew eqn) podjydwe ‘ujdap ‘uad 0) = Jo < Wa ‘W/S' SIN3Z9018 ; j ; j ; TNO HW LS Se/Sz/e0
yew eqn) Moj|aq dUgeRy Jayjays ‘yew eqn) podiydwe !;w/S 9SINS9019 i ILS $6/SZ/80
WG JO eSeq) YOdes JO} INIYd ‘19 Jedim ‘pueq yep WO}Og 0} “yNs Wd SINS9OIa Il NO Wl 1S $6/S2/80
JEW AQ) UI dy JEW aqn) Mojag JUgey Jayjays ‘yew aqn) podiydwe ‘ZG! OINS9018 IAs se/sz/e0
yew eqn) podiydwe esuap ‘mojjeys spion Buipaay -Cwuaiquiyy SINS9OI8 | 1S $6/Sz/80
ays ew eqn) podjydwe dn-paddu ‘juaiquwe s} pnw ';wy/S} OINS9OI98 I) LS $6/92/80
(\uaique) yodai Jo) INIYd ‘WeEW aqn) podiydwe esuap ‘juaique si pnw ‘yw/s} OINa9018 INO WW LS S6/Sz/80
yew eqn) podiydwe esuap ‘juaique s} pnw ‘yWw/s| SINa9018 NO I! 1S S6/Sz/80
eme-|iNd ‘saqn) podiydwe BulAesap ‘juaiquiy| OINS9OI8 NO Il 1S S6/S7/80
yew aqn) podiydwe Burkeoap ‘w/sf SINS9O1I8
LS s6/Sz/e0
loeyme eq Aew pion 6) ‘spuasopod ‘oul spodiydwe ‘juaiquiy} OSINS9018 ILS S$6/SZ/80
Bel ays ‘Wa Ss! pnw ‘wish OINS9DOIS i i 13GNI 6/92/80
Be) snoos esepns ‘Wa S| pnw ‘W/S) WOISAHd i INO {LS $6/SZ/80
yew aqn) BuAeoap ‘wa s} pnw ‘W/Sf SINS9OI8 ; p i j i i i 1S $6/Sz/80
WG SI pnw ‘WS OINS9O18 : jl i INO I LS 96/92/80
| OG eoueqimsia ueow XeW ‘UN eely UeOW ‘Xe ‘UlW ely UeOW Obuey “XeW ‘UW ‘eI ‘ON epowsolew ‘xeW "UN bes
sjuewwo5 mO7 eDENS {ISO sseUX Iu, Gd ueeddy sseuNdiys 1ee;eW pebpog uopesjeued esowes) s}sei9 PNW (ud) ezis ujeig _jeuojsse2ong_—eyeqg_ dew _uoneis}
B3b
NL-94 Mound 1997
g8'bee
cLl6L
Slese
bOGZL
8S'802
06821
NO 1 1S
__ 43QNI
WNO 1s
OL Mas
WoL tas
MZ98'60 220
M998 'b0 220
MS98'b0 220
M868'F0 720
Mv68'r0 220
MZ88'¢0 220
M1S8'b0 220
MtS8'b0 220
Mere’ b0 220
MeZ8'¢0 220
M1880 220
M898'b0 220
M168'b0 220
Mp88'b0 220
M88'b0 220
Mt28'b0 220
MOE8'bO 220
M9E8'b0 220
MEZ8'b0 220
MZ98'60 220
MeZ8'b0 220
M608'F0 220
Me08'F0 220
M862 'b0 220
MS¥6'F0 220
MZS6'¥0 220
M966'b0 220
wnw)xeW Whi easy
SSOUHIIY1 JeNe,eW PeBpeig
aBuey wnwixey WwnwiulW
uonesjeued eseweD
Jayaweiq yunog
s}sejopnw
NOMOYANON YOM FT OYNTINANYN MN TF OMTONAMNMANANAYAMN AN TINA TOM MMM OMT tO TOMO AN
wunw)xeyW Wnwiuiyy
(ud) exis ujesy
jeuojssesons
MOS6'h0 220
MLE€6'b0 220
M926'b0 220
MS1+6'b0 220
ME1L6'b0 220
M806 'b0 220
MZZ8'b0 220
M128'b0 220
MS+8'b0 220
MS¥6 0 220
M9S6'h0 220
M616'b0 220
MO18'b0 220
M808'F0 220
M608'b0 220
M26Z'b0 220
MZBZ'b0 220
M082 'b0 220
MSZZ'b0 220
HGNLISNO1
869b7 91 Ib
92°91 tb
L6pbo 91 bP
86E77'91 Ib
b2Z2°91 bb
S6612'91 bb
L6EZT9L Le
£627 91 bb
8827 Oh LP
S8917 91 Ib
88612 91 Lp
99222 91 bb
260929} bP
2609291 be
6E97 91 Lb
SLLOZ OL bb
SO692'91 Lb
S1892'91 bb
cLL97 OL bb
S8292 91 by
beleOb bb
606191 bP
6881 9b be
8658191 Lb
C6E0E'OL bb
G60E'91 bh
GE0E'S! Ib
80E2 91 bP
886291 be
80862 91 bb
60291 tb
St902'91 bb
8190291 bb
690291 bP
GS8202'91 bb
26017 91 be
S6612 91 Lb
8696291 bb
Qbe' Ol bP
8828291 Lp
S8P87 Ol bP
ZEB Ol IP
€88re ol tp
€60r7 91 th
€80b7 91 bb
ZOpbe Ol IP
SqnLiLVv1
ASAIVWNV SWIL
UOnEIS
yi] Uad 0} MOJINg ‘aqny yNs smuajdojaeyD'6e| |jays ‘sjoespe sadim:ywy/S:uad<wp WOISAHd
Aejo paseaus jo sjay0d ‘yjdap woe je SpioA “ws ‘6e| jjays ‘;/S ‘uad<wp JSON
Pion Buipaay ‘unoos pins ‘saqn) eosijadwiy ma} e ‘Be; jjays'seaws Jedim'yy/S ‘ued<wp AWOISAHd
2} UO SPIOA 5] NS UO Saqn) edsijedwy :be| U) Sijaus 1S 4q: WOISAHd
mong daap :6e| |jays WOISAHd
WP Jq p/m Aejo |q jaajS ‘yew podiydwe ‘Be jays 6):esawes Aqsip'pns:uad<cwp AWOISAHd
YeWPE_DuUTeaWS Jadim :pNs je eqn) :W/S :Ued<wp I30NI
Aynyedguiu) Gdy 'Seqn) ws May‘pNs ye S}jays 24a)SAO 6] !Aejo yq-1q ‘uad<wp OINS9OI8
WIS} 20} SpIoA Buipaay Ws ‘sruajdojaeyy ‘wp poveAe| 'W/S ‘ued<wp ISaQNI
mong daap jew aqn) eosijadwy dn-paddu :Buuowie Be; jays ‘uad<wp AWOISAHd
Wd6 POA Buipaaj/moung ‘uoysanb ui BuvowJe-pns uyjuo sjjays eAW ‘uad<wp AWOISAHd
ujdap Wo/-p 34nj}deJ) JO pioA Bulaay 6) ‘spodiydwegsaqn) pns ‘Be |jays ‘uad<wp AWDOISAHd
Ody Paseaws ‘sjdeype Jadim Joulw ‘Buvowse-Be| (jays ‘w/S :ued<wp WOISAHd
SPIOA Bulpaay !saqn) eosiadwiy ‘sjoeje Jadim ‘pues ul Ge] jjays !w/S ‘uad<wp WWOISAHd
EPiOA Guypaa) jo!as :Leueyjaw ‘gay Ayojed :6e| (ays !W/S ‘ued<wp AWOISAHd
Pion Bujpaay :(S)joeyd)oJgQe) payow :Ayedg_uiy) Qdy:0e| |/ays:|9e)ye Jadjm:uad<wip L3AGNI
Ujdap je dqgey DNOeYD !yewW aqn) dn-paddu ‘Be; jays ‘yw/S ‘ued<wp AWOISAHd
uoisosa:yjdap je syqes Soeys:jew aqny dn-paddu:pues u! Bey jays: y/S:ued<wp SINS9OI8
Kejd J8A0 pdi pues ui) :uidap Wo p-z piOA Bulpasy :be| |jays -uad<wp WOISAHd
21ge) DOeY :6e| ays: w/S :uad<wp AWOISAHd
WW9 6 PIOA ‘uns UO Saqn) podiydwe ‘Be |jays !w/S ‘uad<wp OINSDOIg
Wd g SWJOM UI) :aUl) -j) UO MON :be] [jays «W/S .Uad<wp WWOISAHd
WOp}-Z} SpIOA Bulpaay ‘6uvowwe-6e| jays pue sjjays ‘uad<cwp WOISAHd
PIOA Buipagy “6y!;}ew aqn) dn-paddus ‘6e) jays ‘w/S ‘uad<wp AWOISAHd
du JO Bueaws awos ‘sain}oeJ) /M JSEjopNwW aAlSayoo :UadJapuN ‘yy/g ‘Uad<Wip AVDISAHd
ujdap wd g 0) umos spion Gulpaay'zspodiydwy'6e| |jays ‘w/S:uad<wp AWODISAHd
SPIOA Builpaay Wsyew aqny dn-paddu ‘Be, jays ‘~papose aoeyns ‘w/s ‘uad<wp AWOISAHd
umop-BeJp Jo/mosngouge; Ja)|ays/pioA Buipaay:moung:bey jays: w/S:ued<wp AWOISAHd
spodiydwe ‘anf :6e) jays !zsyoeje sadim ‘uad<wp WOISAHd
wa)sAs mong 6) :uad<wp 9INS901I9
J}9 MONG ‘}wW| Uad Jeau Sainjoe4 Z Be] [jays:sieaws Jadim:yy/S -uad<wp WOISAHd
PIA Buipaay !moung deap ‘;W/S uly) ‘}Se}9 pnw Jadim !uad<wp L3Q0NI
Jeuo0)SOJa‘}!LW!| Uad JeaU SPIOA pue MONG daap ‘6e| ||ays ‘;W/S ‘uad<wp AWOISAHd
2Plon Bulpaay :Aydjed Gy :be| [aus ysijays:Ouseaws Jadim :uad<wp WOISAHd
21 Oj9y :2ploupAy pue saqn) ‘WS ‘uad<wp AWOISAHd
“UNS UO Ja}Sqo) BuNoOA ‘ys UO (24}) aBe}S)pion adeyNsqns 6 ‘6e) jays ‘uad<wp JASON
pion Buipaay ‘saqn) pins ws ‘Be; jjays :uad<wp AWOISAHd
SPIOA Buipaay ajqissod !6e| jays ‘ued<wp I30NI
quie) Gdy ‘uidap wog-z SpioA Bulpagy ‘Be; jays Jou ‘yw/S ‘uad<wp 43QNI
INOIS INS :Saqn) edsijedwy dn paddi ‘sjaeyipe Jad y FWOISAHd
Jeuolsoa ‘Buueaws Jadim ‘;w/S ‘ued<wp WOISAHd
yjdap je Wom ‘nods yuns !saqn) (Z)podiydwe “anfg'aAjod ‘sGey \}ays ‘W/S ‘uad<wp WOISAHd
HNS UO SajesaWojbuos ajpeuseqysyao! AWOISAHd
yew aqn) podiydwe dn-paddis ‘Be; jays snjyAw ‘uad<wp AOISAHd
yew aqn) spodiydwe dn-paddu ‘BuowJe-6e| |jaysgs|iays ‘wp pajjjow ‘yw/s ‘uadaup AWOISAHd
Pas sqpyq Ayajed ‘6e| jJays ‘uadsapun ‘uad<wp WOISAHd
eoueqinjsig) junod
syuawiwi05 e2eyns| euewjew
iwc
za
<tact
z22az
<qjt x
2jz2z
<x
z
ojooojonocooo00c 90 [oe 0o1000
peshesiegsi-osisgsi-as
ojooojooojo0c ojo coc ojoo0°0
nx
oO
8212
ve 6E
€S'6E
40°99
OL'FOL
es'6L
=<
z
22 aa
Lv ve
pLdth
VN
~ rio
<
z
ueay = WNWIkeW wnwiuW ey fueaW ‘xeW ‘UIN
SSoUxoIUL Gd juaseddy punogey xopay uoneis
alr $r/w =o Sf os
ooo olw oO o]o OOlO oO Olo oO Ofo Oo Oo O OlO Oo OO
B4
Northern Region 1997
MZ81'SO 220
M261'SO 220
M681 SO 220
MZ26'S0 220
ME+6'SO 240
Mt26'S0 220
MOv6'r0 220
M9¥6 60 220
MS¥6 ¥0 220
M6+8'¥0 2L0
M8S8'b0 220
MO069'b0 220
MZSS'b0 240
M2z89'b0 240
20SE9 91 Lp
2OE9 OI Lb
88Sc9'9} bP
ZIEBL Ob Lb
LL22°91 bb
cELZ Ob bb
LOE9'9t LP
€9E9 91 bP
S8ic9 91 LP
ZOCLL OL LP
E0rZZ 91 Le
chro Ol LP
c00P9 91 bP
LLGE9'9L LP
WOLtis
WOL Wis
MZ9S'¢0 220
MZSS'b0 220
Mg9S'b0 cL0
LL69L'91 Lb
SOEBL 91 by
cl6ZZ 91 bY
WtNO WLS
wnwixeyy wnwiuly eay
SSOUyd}UL JeEayeW pabpag
0
0)
te)
(0)
0
0
t
0
")
0
()
0
0
0
(0)
0
ie)
(0)
10)
fe)
0
0
0
0
(0)
0)
i¢)
0
0
0
10)
0
te)
0
0
0
ebuey wnwixew wnwiuiy |iajaweig junop| epow
uojjesjauag e1aweD
sysejopnw
soley
AMAMNAYAANYNAMNMNMNYNMANNNMNN MMO
wnwixey wnwiuiy
(1ud) az1s wean
|euojssa9ons
M8EP 60 220
MObb $0 220
M6Eb'b0 220
MtS2'b0 220
M8S2'b0 220
MZZ2'v0 220
M182 v0 220
M6Z1t'¥0 220
MOte'v0 220
Ms02'F0 220
MZ96'€0 220
M9E6'E0 220
M0Z6'€0 220
MS66€0 220
M666'E0 220
Mc00'b0 220
8692991 be
SOZc9 91 IP
ZELc9 91 IP
982 91 lb
€v082 91 tp
cOcZZ 91 bb
cOcLZ 91 IP
46/01/60
26/01/60
26/90/60
c2BEO Ot LP
89629 91 LP
ZLPEO OL LP
80222 91 bb
ZO69Z 91 bP
ev082 9 LP
S008Z'9} bP
SO8Z'91 LP
80822'91 LP
26/01/60
M626'E0 220
M26 £0 220
MZ96'€0 220
SONLISNOT
€c9 9b bP
89bc9 OL LP
cL8c9 91 Lb
AGNLULV1 LSAIVWNV AWIL
eg
‘day uoneys
B5a
Reference Areas 1992
0 ZL A lev Gz 0 0 poe € v< Webs oq] 928 26608 9 NO J8YH-7N
(0) com) e6E eve 0) 0) poe ft p< abe oa! 928 z6608 q 0 «J8Y-1N
0 6S°0 BES 6L2 ) 0 poe 2 p< 1 62S oq! »z8 26608 e NO J8H-IN
0 26:0 1OL p99 0 0 poe oO p< 1) aBe\Ss oq! €18 26608 2 MOOE 4J®Y-1N
0) 65°0 AoW eZ 9 0 0) poe | p< 11 aBeS oq/ z18 26608 q MOOG 4J8H-1N
0 pe0 1LS 2eS 0 0 poe p< 1 Bes oaq/ z18 26608 e MOOE J8H-IN
0 1S0 eGl Z0'L 0 0) poe Zz p< I eBe1s NO 11 abeIS oq/ HHO 26608 2 SO0OE J2@H-IN
0 ss 0 189 92°9 0 0) poe 2 p< \) aBes oq/ O10 26608 Q SsOOE J@H-IN
0) r9'0 928 ra) 0 () poe Z p< I eBe1S NO 11 ebeS ol 2001 z6608 2 SOOE J8H-IN
0) Ko lev 9z'€ 0 0 poe | v< x oq! 6r6 Z6608 2 ud0e 48H-IN
0 ss°0 Zs LS’ 0 (0) poe 4} p< x oq! 8r6 z6608 q udde J8H-IN
0 920 96'S zs 0) 0 poe - p< | a6es oq! Lv6 z6608 e uodde 48Y-IN
0 9E'L Leb Sse 0) 0 yoe z@ p< 11 86eS oa! 8€8 26608 q 98006 J8H-IN
0 241-0 62'S Zs 0 0 poe Z p< 11 a6e1S oq! 2€8 26608 e 3006 J8Y-IN
) »9'0 es 91S 0 0) poe t p< 11 86e1S oq! 218 26608 9 M002 48H-IN
0 90°} 88'S zy 0) 0) yore O ps 11 a6eS oq! 918 76608 q Mo0e J8H-IN
0 6S°0 Vy IS 0) 0 poe | p< abes oq! 918 26608 e mo0e J8H-IN
0 ss'0 1L8 918 0 0 pole 2 v< 1 abeys oq! 200} 26608 2 s00@ 4®H-IN
0 bh 888 BLL 0 0 poe - p< 1 e6es oq| 9001 26608 q so0e@ J8H-IN
) 20 99°01 6p'0l 0 0) poe 2 p< 1 e6eS oq! SOO 26608 ® s0d0@ 48H-IN
0 18'0 S9'b 18e 0 0 poe oO bs | a6eIS oal €S6 26608 2 udde 4J8H-IN
0) Lv0 e's Leg 0) 0 poe f p< 1 eBeis oq/ €S6 z6608 q u00e J9H-IN
0) 1S0 €r9 z6S 0 0 poe 4 < 1 a6e1S oq! 2S6 26608 e udde J8Y-IN
0) 920 9E'P 9€ 0 0 yoe Zz p< 1) aBeIS oq! ves 26608 2 98002 J®Y-1N
0 rade €9 80'S 0 0 A) p< I eBe1S NO 11 aBeIS oq! ves 26608 q 3002 J8Y-IN
0) ss‘0 60°9 v's () 0 poe | p< 11 a6eS oq/ €€8 26608 e 3002 4J8Y-IN
) 96:2 €y'9 lve 0 0) poe 4 p< ebeis oq/ 128 26608 2 MOO} J8H-IN
0 phil LL ZS'p 0 0 poe tt y< 1 e6es oq/ 0z8 26608 q MOOL J8H-IN
0 ly? S6b Sz 0) 0) poe 4f p< 1 ebeis oq/ 028 z6608 e mOOl J8Y-1N
0 210 z6S SLS 0 0 poe 2 p< ebes oq/ z00t z6608 2 sOOk 48H-IN
0 vel Lv9 €S'p 0 0) poe 4 p< abes oq! z00} 26608 Q soot J@H-IN
(0) Ss 0 bye 9S°9 0 () poe 2 p< 1 e6eS oq/ 1001 26608 eB soOL J@H-IN
() 8b't SL 29S 0) 0 poe - p< 11 Bes : 856 26608 2 u0d0l 48H-1N
0 BLL 669 19'p 0) 0 poe O p< x oq! 256 26608 q uod0lL J@H-IN
) 920 O'S vb 0 0 poe 4f y< Webes oq! 956 z6608 eB UudOk 4J8Y-IN
0 ss 0 90'p IS'€ 0) 0 poe 2 p< ebes oq! oes 26608 2 98001 J®H-1N
0 £9°0 e6'e ee 0) 0) poe 2 p< 1 ees oq! oes 26608 q 3001 J8H-IN
0 SEL 90°F 1L2 ) () yoe 2 p< 1 abeis oq/ 628 26608 e 3001 J8Y-1N
abuey = wWNwixeyy Wnwyuly | JaJaWeIG yunog WNWxe,y) WNW Wy
souyodjyt apow ely "J8Y
levaey Loyesauad esaweD sysejopnyw sofew (Jud) azig uyery aBeys jeuojssaoons + jepnyjbuo7 apnyyey ysAjeuy out ayeq |dayuoners punoy
poebpaig
jeaiskud
jeaiBojoig
jeaiHojo1g
jea1Bojoig
jeo!Bojo1g
jealBojoig
jea1Bojo1g
jeoiHojoig
jea1Bojo1g
jea1Bojo1g
jea|Bojolg
jeaiBojoig
jeaiBojoig
jealBojoig
jealBojoig
jeaBojo1g
jeo1Bojo1g
jeoiBojoig
jea16ojo1g
jea1Bojoig
jealGojoig
jealBojoig
jea1Bojoig
jeaiBojo1g
jea1Bojo1g
jeo|Gojolg
yeaisAud
jea1Bojo1g
yeoishud
jeolGojo1g
jea1Bojo1g
jeaiBojo1g
jea1Bojoig
yealHojoig
jeoiBojoig
jeoiBojo1g
JealBojo1g
jea1Bololg
v
S
S
9
S
S
Z
S
8
coo0oooeoeooaeoeeeeeCeCOeOGeGGGeGeGCeCCCACCeCCCGGCeeGeCee0c0oCc Oo
cococoocoeoeoeoeoeooOOOoOOeoaoOeaGeGaGOeCeCCOCCCOCGCeGCeGeCeCeCeCeCoo eo
SeQNo0m7D0 0T0D O0GQDoOTHotTHoOoTHomHomonosnnHnoeomnovranosgno
WNUWXeW) WNUUy) ealy “Xe ‘u
Ww
ealy ‘Joy
ope | at) ssouyolul Gdy Juaseddy punoqay xopay day uoners spunow
goeyins eueYyaW
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(0)
0)
0
0
(0)
0
0
0
0
0
(0)
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 <i ebeis oa] Liy 26808 2
0 0) 0) poe |} p< 1) a6e\S oq/ Lip z6808 q
0 0 0) yore | p< 1 e6eis oq/ Si z6808 e
0 (0) (0) yoe 2 v< I eBe1S NO 1 a6e1S oa! Sep 26808 B)
0 0 0) poe Zz p< 1) aBeis oq! pep 26808 q
0 0) 0) poe 4} p< Il eBeyS NO 11 abeS oq/ ev Z6808 e
0 0 0 poe 2 p< 1 a6e1S NO [1 abeIS oq/ 02s 26808 R)
0 0 (0) poe 2 p< In eBe1S NO 11 ebeS oat 02S 26808 q
0) 0 0) poe 2 p< 1 abes oq! BLS 76808 e
0 0 0 poe 2 p< 1) a6e\S oq/ €SS 26808 B)
0 0 0 poe 2 p< 11 aBeS oq! ISS 26808 e
0 0) 0 YS OB p< 1 ees oq/ 1SP 26808 R)
0 0) 0 poe Zz p< 1 e6es oq/ 1Sp 26808 q
(0) (0) (0) poe 2 p< I 8621S NO I a6e1S oq! OSP 26808 e
0 0 0 poe Zz p< I aBeIS NO 11 eBeIS oa! Lev 26808 R)
0 0 0 poe 2 p< I eBe1s NO 11 ees oq! Oey Z6808 q
0 0) 0 poe Z p< Il ees NO 11 a6e\S oat 6cP 26808 e
0 0 0) poe 2 p< I 8BeS NO 11 e6eS oal Ses 26808 R)
0 0 0 poe 2 p< i aBeis NO 11 ees oq! eS 26808 q
0 0 0) yOEe Zz < 1 aes oa! ves 26808 e
0 0 0) poe 2 p< 1 ebes oa! Lvs 26808 h)
0 (0) 0 p< enc, b< 1 ebes oq! bbs z6808 q
0 (0) (0) poe 2 p< \ aBeIs oq! €bS 26808 e
0 (0) 0 poe 1 p< I a6eS NO 11 aBeIs oq! Str 26808 b)
0 0) 0 poe Z p< | aes oqI Sbp Z6808 q
0) (0) 0) poe 2 p< Il eBe1s NO 1 e6eS oq! bpp 26808 e
0 0 0 poe Zz p< 1 abe oq! SEP z6808 A)
0 0 ) poe |} p< I 8Be1S NO 11 a6e1S oq/ Sev 26808 q
0) 0 0) poe Zz p< il eBeyS NO 1 ebeS oal per 26808 e
0 60 rd poe 2 p< | aes oq/ oes 26808 h)
0 0 0) poe zZ p< | a6eS oq/ oes 26808 q
0 0 0 ye Z p< 1 abes oq/ 62S 26808 e
0 0 0 poe 2 p< In aBeis NO 11 eBeIS oa! Ops 26808 b)
0 0) 0 poe Zz p< 1 abe oq! 66S 26808 q
0 0) 0 poe zZ p< a6es oq/ Ses 26808 e
0 0 0 pole Zz p< 1 ebes oq! bpp 26808 9
0 0 0) poe Zz p< 11 86S oql Opp 26808 q
0 0 0 poe x p< 1, eBes oq! 6Eb 26808 e
ebuey WINLWIXe WY) LUNLWUUSY] | JaJoWeIG yunog WNWIxeyW WNWIulyy
SoUuyoYy) apow ealy "JOH
jepaew uojjeaudd esaweD sjsejopnyw sofeyw (jyd) azjg ujery aBeys jeuolssazo9ns pnyGuo7 apnyyeq ysAjeuy owl ayeq |dayuoners juno
pabpag
SWJOM |}| 6)S pue spodiudwe sadojs awos yew aqn) soepyns
SS
yew aqn) aoepns adojs awos
x
adojs awos
yew aqn) aoepyins
ds eosiadwiy adeyns uo yew aqn)
adeyNS UO Jew aqn}
SONS UO JEW aqn) asuap
spiopAy yew eqn) soeyns
yew aqn) aoeyns
yew aqn)
yeu aqn) asuapx
yew aqn) soeyns
yew aqn} voeyns spiospAy
yew aqn) aoepns
yeu aqn) aoepns
yew aqn} aoepyns
SOeUNS UO jeW aqn) asuap
sploupAy pue yew aqn) asuap
adojs awos saoeyNs UO Saqn) pue spiospAY
yeu oqn) soeuns
yew aqn) asuap
yew aqn) adeyns asuap
€2qn) ||| BIS += yew podiydwe
B9EUNS UO PalayjedS S}jays awWos paddy
a@0e}INS UO JeW aqn) asuap
aoeuNS UO yew aqn)
adojs awos
yew aqn} aoeyns
sploipAy xy sugap soepyns
9OepNS uO yew aqn)
yew aqn}
saqn) aoepns spioupAy
spioupAy pue yew aqny
x
SOeUNS UO Jel agn) asuap
yew podiydwe aoepns
PloupAy aoeyns uo yew agn)
adojs awos
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
O
N
fon
jeaiskyd
JeolHojoig
jeoishud
jeo1Bojo1g
jeolBojo1g
jealBojoig
jeo1Bojo1g
jeo1bojo1g
yeoiBojoig
jeo1Bojo1g
jeo1Bojo1g
jeoiBojoig
jeoiHojo1g
jeal6ojoig
jea1Hojoig
jeaiBojoig
jeo|Hojoig
jea1Bojo1g
jeaiBojo1g
jea|Bojolg
jeaiBojo1g
jeolBojoig
jea1Bojolg
jea1Bojo1g
jeaiskud
jealBojoig
jeaibojoig
jeoiBojo1g
jeolBojoig
jeaiBojog
jeolBojoig
feaiBojoig
jeaGojo1g
jealBojoig
jeolHojo1g
jeo1Bojoig
jeo|Bojoig
jeoiHojoig
aoeyns
aoueqinisig
~nnORRDONONMUONnRDDNRATNO TD
o
oooo0oococooo0coe°oc°c0co0o0c0co0co0c0co0qcco0cocecocecece0o0c0ee0oo0eo°oco
oooooocoocoococoocoocoeocoocoococececCcCCcCCCcCCeCeeCeCeCceCceCcee0coCcCcCooo
swoomnoomnoomoonmnomnononmrnomrnonmngnomomnomgnnownoo
wNnWIxey WNnuWjUlW eay “xeW “Ul
eauy ‘Jey
‘day uonels punow
yuno9
aueueW
SSaUuyo1IN) Gd Juaieddy punogay xopay
[] pococeecccccoeceseneeeccecoeseeseseees
[8 fpownenconnnoennnees
ooo Nooo noo ono nono nono oo eee eee ee)
SOUxd|YL
leyoyey
pabpaig
-O9009000COCCOCOMMDDGCCGGOOCCOCOC0O090
for)
jo)
eco00C0O0OC OCC COOOONDAOAOCCAOCGCOCOOrroCCCCoCeeoeoeoo
ooooooo0o0o0o0000 0
abuey winwixey wWnujU [sajawelq yunoD
uojesjauag essed
sisejopny
err rOoOrr er Orr rOOOxXxxO0OOrOoOrrr COOxXxXOrOroOorrHe Oo
wnwyxeW wnwUly)
(ud) azjs uyery
i ebers NO 1 ebeis
| abes
In aBeIs NO | aBeIS
il ees NO 1 ebeS
| aes
| abels
| abeS
i a6es NO | ees
| a6es
x
x
x
x
I abe
| abe
| a6e1S
abes
x
Il eBeS NO 1 abeIs
x
abeis
x
x
JHGNI
x
130NI
x
| ees
ais)
1 a6es
| a6e1S
1 abes
| abels
1 abe\s
| a6e\s
aBeys jeuoissa9ons
pepnyjGuo7 apnynyey
oq] Celt 26808 9 40 J8H-1S8M
oq! Zeth 26808 q JNO J9H-1S8M
oql LELL 26808 e 40 J8YH-1SOM
oq/ OL 26808 2 MOOE J9H-1SaM
oq! Spbt 26808 Q MOOE J2H-1S8M
oq/ pelt 26808 eB MOOG J2H-IS9M
al eh 26808 2 SQOE J9H-IS9M
oq/ ESL Z6808 Q SQOE J2Y-1SEM
oq/ 2Sth 26808 ® SQOE J8H-1S9M
oq! gre 26808 2 U00DE J2H-1S8M
oat Spel 26808 q UO0E J@H-1IS8M
oq! Zt 26808 2 98006 J8H-1S8M
oq! Obl 26808 Q a00€ J8H-1SEM
oq! 6ItL z6808 ® a00E J8H-ISAM
oa! ILL 26808 9 mO0Z J9H-ISaM
oq/ ILE 26808 q mO0z J9H-1S8M
oq/ Orit Z6808 eB mo0z J8H-1S8M
oq/ eSIl z6808 2 s002 J@H-IS9M
oq! ZSL 26808 q s00z J8H-1S8M
oa! 2Ghh z6808 ® s00% J24-1S9M
oq/ Opel 26808 2 u00% J@H-ISaM
oq/ Opel 26808 Q ud0Z J8H-1S9M
oq| 6Ez1 26808 eB u00Z J8H-IS9M
oa! eet 26808 2 28002 J8H-IS8M
oq! rae 26808 Q 3002 J8H-1S8M
oq/ Oztt 26808 B 38002 J8H-1S8M
oq/ Zeb 26808 2 MOOL J@H-IS9M
oqI Zeb 26808 Q MOO! J8H-IS8M
oq! QELL 26808 2 MOOL JeH-SeM
sql p0zl 26808 2 SOO J8H-IS8M
oq! £021 Z6808 q SOOl J8H-1S8M
oq! £021 26808 eB SOO} J8H-ISAM
oq! OlZ z6808 2 udOl J2H-1S8M
oql 6021 z6808 q u00l J@H-1SEM
oq/ 80cl c6808 eB uUdOl J2aH-3SAM
oq! Aw 26808 2 28001 J9H-IS9M
oq/ 9Z14 76808 q 9001 J@H-1S9M
oq! Gelb z6808 ® 3001 J8H7S9M
ealy JOH
ysAjeuy = OWL ayeq |dayuoners punow
jeaibojoig
jeo16ojoig
jealBojoig
jeolBojoig
lea1Bojoig
jeoBojo1g
jeoBojoig
jeoBojo1g
jeaiBojolg
x
x
jea1Bojo1g
jeolBojoig
jeolBojo1g
jeoiBojoig
jeoiHojoig
jeoiBojolg
jeo1Bojoig
jea1Bojolg
jeaiGojo1g
jeolBojoig
x
x
jea|Hojoig
jeoiBojoig
jeolHojo1g
jeo|Bojo1g
jea1Bojo1g
jea|Bojo1g
jeo1Bojo1g
jeaiBojorg
jeaiBojoig
jeoiBojoig
jeaiGojo1g
jeoiBojoig
jea1Bojo1g
jea1Bojo1g
jeaiBojo1g
JOH-1ISOM
JOH-ISOM
JOY-1SOM
JOH-ISOM
J9H-ISOM
J9H-1SOM
JOH-1SOM
JOH-ISOM
JOH-IS8M
J8Y-1SOM
J9H-1SOM
J9H-ISOM
JOH-1SOM
JOY-1SOM
JOY-IS8M
J8H-1S8M
JOH-ISOM
JOY-ISOM
J9H-ISOM
reer)
SBRONTIOMORNR ON
aD
~aQ
ooo0oo0oocoocooc°oceoocococe0oc0c00o00ccece0c0c0e000co0 Cc ce0c00c0eceCcece0ce9c cco
emooo0c00cqcoccqcocco0c0cco0o0ocecece0cCcCceco0cocCcceco000co0c 0000 00
ooooo0oo0c0ooco0c0o0c0co0coeccoc0c0cco0o0ece0c00c0c0c0000c0eo00 000
seognoomno0m7Homoomnomnomnomrmnomnonomnowmnotsano
WNWIXeW UNWIUW ealy “xe "Ul
aouequmsiq | yunog Baly Ju
s}uawwod| OG M07 ssouyxoiul Gdy Juaseddy punogay xopay |'day uojers spunow;
aoeuing | euewjay
B5b
Reference Areas 1995
yew aqn} podiydwe dn-pa
snyujap ssei6 jaa ‘yew podiydwy
yew podjydwy
uidap wa g ye MouNg ‘snjujap jueid jew eqn) podiydwy
smoUNg ueade|smud ‘ws Auew ‘jew eqn) podiydwe esuaq
SMOUNQ “WS !YNS Z/| JAAO 0 Gdy ‘Jew eqn) podiydwe dn-paddiy
sjoejie Jadim yew dn-paddy :saqn) podiydwy
wa ¢ do) ul smoUNg ''yNs SOW UO 9 Gd ‘Jew eqn) podiydwe esuap ‘W/S
Joey! Jadim ‘1 YS OISSe|d ‘Wodad JOY LNIYd ‘JEW eqn) podiydwe esuap ‘Ww/S
yew eqn) podiydwe esuaq
wo Z Jaddn ul smoung ueade}smuo jews Auew ‘jew eqn, podiydwe esuag
yew eqn) podiydwe asuag
yew qn) dn-padau ‘w/S
yew eqn) dn-peddy ‘wis
saqn) podjydwe dn-peddu ‘ws
dew eqn) dn-paddu "wis
yew eqn dn-paddu 'yw/s
yew eqn) dn-paddu ‘wis
sjoejme Jadim ‘W/S
epaiddu ‘ws
yew eqn) dn-paddu !ywis
yew eqn dn-paddu ‘ws
yew eqn) podjydwe dn-peddu ‘ws
yew eqn) dn-paddu 'yws
Ua~aSs SPIOA OU ‘WIS
yew aqny dn-paddu ‘ws
saqn podiydwe dn-paddu ‘w/s
Bulyos J0od 0) ‘pow jew eqn) podiydwy
diySu vo Qdqy aWoOs ‘Be jays aWOS ‘yew eqn) BuKedag
yew aqn) podiyduy
eoixodhy ‘paddy ‘Ajjays “ued < Qd¥ ‘payeyjauadiapun
SPIOA “ws !,uONeyjeuad < Gqy
SPIOA ‘WS ‘Seqn) podiydwe Moy
Bulyos Jood ‘oejiye sadim yew eqn) podiydwe dn-paddiy
Bujos Jood ‘yjdap 0) Mowng 6) ‘spuasopod ‘yew eqn) podiydwy
Be} jays ‘sjoeye sadim ‘Bulyos sood jew eqn) podiydwe dn-paddu : vadiapun
sjods u! wo Q Ayojed Qdy ‘6e) ays ‘Bulyos Jood ‘yew dn-paddu ‘ uadiapun
Bunos Jood ‘spjon ‘ws ‘Be; jays awos ‘yew aqny podiydwe dn-paddiy
Os JOOd 0) ‘pow ‘yew aqn) podiydwe dn-paddu "y uo Ajsow Gay :uoNejaued MOT
eoixodAy ‘Furos Jood 0) ‘pow ‘yew dn-paddu ‘payesyauadiapun
OINSSO1I8
OINASO18
SINS9O01I8
SINS9O1I8
SINASOI8
SINSSOI8
SINSSOI8
OIN39018
SINSDOIg —
SINS9018
SIN3ZSO1I8
OINSSO18
130NI
OINS9DO1I8
OINS9018
SOINSSOI8
130NI
SINASOI8
SIN3S901I98
JANI
OINS9OI8
SINSSOI8
SINS9OI8
SINASOI8
SINS9O1I8
SINS9O18
OIN39O18
L30NI
OINSSO18
SINSSO18
SIN39018
OINZ901I8
SINS9018
SINS9O1I8
OINS9O18
SINS9O18
SINASOI8
WOioO wt oO/DO MO
880
0
£72
0
SSOUNIIYL dy Jueseddy
Buryos 100d 0) ‘pow ‘yew aqn) dn-paddu ‘Aynjed Gay SINZDOI8 ~—s8 est ley
Buiyos ood ‘moun 67] ON OINSSOId 8 ez 46599
Buios 400d ‘Be| |jays :pasnseaw ueY) < Qdy ‘parenauadiapun| ON dINZ90Ia Z 912 69S
BuHos Jood ‘Be ays ‘painseaw ue) < Gdy ‘parejausdieapun| ON dDINZ9OIG as ele €or
OG edueqinsig ueew = “XeW
[eae = sjuewwo5 MOT = eDeyIN Iso
Wis
Wis
Wis
NO W 4s
Wis
WWNO WLS
Wis
WNO Ws
NO 11s
Wis
Wis
WNO I Ls
TN
coolooPfcoclo cof
NTINAN ARK NTI
Wis
Was
WNO WLS
Wis
TNO WLS
WNO 11S
MNO WLS
IWNO 14s
Wis
Wis
NO 1s
NO WLS
@)EU|WUE)epU] = GNI
6/92/80
$6/92/80
S6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
96/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
96/92/80
96/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
S6/92/80
6/92/80
$6/9Z/80
$6/92/80
S6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/87/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
S6/92/80
S6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/97/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
$6/92/80
evils
evils
day 1S3M
43y LSM
0 0 Wis
) 0
() ) TNO ILS
0 0
) )
0 0 IW NO Ws
0 ) Wis
0 0 TNO 11s
) 0 Wis
0 0 Wis
0 0 Weis
loolk 6 FS) 90'S v 9 ZOE Wis
0 bre 220 GE ) 0 ZOE Was
40 €SbtZ OLb EO 6 0 0 ZOE NO Wis
vho 8 06see2 aso ' 802 809 0 0 ZOE ¥< - i NO Was
960 9986 20S 164 86S OF ) 0 ZOE v< - 1s
6hZ 2077S 60r 8S g8eF ee 0 0 ZOE t< t- WNO WLS
“Ul Bely uBeW eBuey ‘xeW "Ul ‘e1a ‘ON $SpoWsofew ‘xeW “Ul eBags
uo}jesjeued esowed
(jud) ezjg ujesgy jeuojsse99NS
xamojtcoaojtcmaojcoaojtc oc nao
$6/92/80 @vlS 44ay 1S3SM)
6/92/80 tvwis Jay LSSM
$6/92/80 tWiS 43uy LSSM|
$6/92/80 hWiS 43y 1S3SM|
soy
eeqg dey uones eduesjey
BSc
Reference Areas 1997
000 000 000 00:0 bes 9Lb 000 0 |E%F € M9¢8'S0 220 Z9OISI'91 tp =STH Spe 26/90/60 9 J9HASO8M
00:0 000 00:0 00'0 ples 20°9 00°0 0 J|E%F € p< Ml’8'SO¢cZ0 SZE9I'91 th SIH be 26/90/60 q ELM J8H-IS8M
000 000 00'0 00°0 EZ 92°9 00°0 0 JE%Fr € p< M2p8'S0cZ0 c8Z91'91 lb SIH be 26/90/60 e ELM 48H-1S8M
000 000 000 000 69'S Lhe 000 0 ENP € p< MO0Z6'S0 220 S8S6I'91 Ir SH €:9 26/01/60 p ZIM J8H-1SEM
000 000 000 00:0 [hare 029 00:0 0 EOP € p< M8?6'S0 cZ0 EEE0C 91 Ib SH Ove 26/90/60 i) CIM j8H-IS8M
000 000 000 00:0 €8S¢ 9S p 00°0 0 EVP € P< MZ96'S0 220 ZELEI 91 Ie SH Ove 26/90/60 q ZIM J8H-1S8M
000 000 00°0 000 956 SB 00°0 0 JE%F € p< MSEB8'SO0 220 SI9ZE91 lp STH See 26/90/60 oe) LEM J8HASEM
000 000 00:0 00°0 6021 92 1b 00:0 0 |e%F € p< Merve's0 220 809zc6'91 tp STH vee 26/90/60 q LLM J8H-1S8M
000 000 000 000 vb Ol 186 000 0 EVP € p< M8r8'S0 220 c69CE 91 be SH e:€ 26/90/60 e LLM J8H-ISeM
000 000 00:0 00'0 Sb y 90° 00'0 0 J|e%Fr € p< ME16S0¢cZ0 80291 lp SIH 82:9 26/01/60 p OM J8H-1IS8M
000 000 000 000 oS8 CLL 00:0 0 ZOE é p< MZ26'S0 2Z0 E6502 91 Ir S1H vEE 26/90/60 i) OM $8Y-1IS8M
000 000 000 00°0 6S'8 108 000 0 EVP é bs M1t26'S0 220 ©0861 91 IP S1H 62:€ 26/90/60 e OlLM J8H-ISOM
000 000 00'0 000 j989 8SO SIZ zg'9 00:0 0 € M192 €0 220 8629991 LP SH 6b: 1 26/90/60 i)
000 000 000 000 |062 +90 e228 £492 0% t € MtZ2€02Z0 SE0Z991 1p SIH 8b:t 26/90/60 q
000 000 000 000 |826 6€0 P6 806 00°0 0 € MtZ2€0220 7294991 1b SIH Zp:t 26/90/60 B
000 000 000 000 |188 SPO +06 6S8 000 0 € MSES'E0 220 OB8Z9l IP S1H 8r:Z 26/01/60 p
000 000 00'0 000 }869 7260 treL es 9 00°0 0 € MeSS'€0 220 6991 1b SIH cb: 26/90/60 )
000 000 00°0 000 |968 EFO st6 vZ8 000 0 € MISS'€0 220 8688991 IP SH opt 26/90/60 q
000 000 000 000 |jS6Z €S0 128 892 00:0 (0) € MI9EE0 2Z0 S009Z 91 Ir S1H 9E:1 26/90/60 i)
000 000 00°0 ooo }1€8 6E0 oss cls. 000 0 € MOS9E'E0 220 e991 lb SIH Se:t 26/90/60 q
000 000 00°0 000 joeb6 280 126 688 000 0 € M6SE'€0 220 €0E9291 lh SIH ve: 26/90/60 e
000 000 00:0 000 |s¢ZzZ 921 8€8 abd 00:0 0 € MO8E'E0 220 Ec8991 ly SIH 25:2 —L6/01/60 p
000 000 00:0 000 |jpeS Lec Lr9 02 b 00°0 (0) € IOL ILS} MiZE'€O 220 822991 tr S1H Oe:t 26/90/60 q
000 000 00:0 000 |re8 €90 sss co 2 000 (0) € ILS} MZZE'€0 220 Z08Z9'91 tr S1H Oe: 26/90/60 e
000 000 00°0 000 |tO6 OFO #26 p88 000 0 € INO ILS} MeleeO2Z0 ©€89991 Ir S1H pS:2 26/01/60 p
000 000 000 000 j€2e9 6EO0 er9 v09 00:0 0 € r. M9660 220 886S9 91 IP S1H Let 26/90/60 9
000 000 00:0 000 j4b>9 6E0 299 829 00°0 te) € MEOE €0 220 9991 lp SH Gel 26/90/60 e
000 000 000 000 |169 8gO OeL 299 000 0 €OF € p< M8EB'10 220 cO9SS 91 IP S1H ve-2l 26/90/60 i)
000 000 000 000 |tlL9 890 L£p9 oss 000 0 ¥< v v< MEEB' 10220 EZ209S 91 Ie SH veel 26/90/60 q peIS J8Y NOIN
000 000 00'0 000 j€c6 620 LE6 806 00'0 0 COP € p< M818'10 220 Z60ZS 91 Ib S1H bé:ct 26/90/60 e peIS J8Y NOIN
000 000 00'0 00;0 J€E9S SPO 98S Ors 00'0 1) COP € v< MZZ8'10220 =vlOZ 9t IP SH 60:8 26/01/60 8 €eB)S J8Y NOIN
000 000 000 000 j99S 190 6S Ors 00°0 0 EP € p< MO088'10 220 €966991 Ir S1H 60:8 26/01/60 p €eIs J9Y NOIN
000 000 000 00:0 |40S 890 los €lb 000 0 ENP € p< M688'102Z0 == L6991 Ih SH 9t:et 26/90/60 i) EBS $8H NOIN
000 000 00:0 000 j6S2 OF€0 ple pe? 000 0 Ep € p< M168 10 220 c69 91 IP SH Sl:2t 26/90/60 q ERIS J8H NOIN
000 000 000 000 |S¢r cé60 tly 6ZE 000 0 EVP € p< M1l68'10 220 2OE69 91 IP S1H St:2t 26/90/60 e ERIS J8H NOIN
000 000 000 000 |j8E tt 20 OS tt 9c tk 000 0 EOP € ¥< M2S0 20220 20ZSS 91 Ie SH O€:21 26/90/60 co) 28S j8Y NOIN
000 000 00'0 000 jrr6 let Sool ¥88 00°0 0 ¥< v ps MItSO'20 220 ~ZB86SS 91 le SH 62:21 26/90/60 q 28S J8Y NOIN
000 000 00°0 000 j68'8 2480 ze6 Svs 00°0 0 b< v b< MtSO'20 220 cpS9S91 tb SIH 82:21 26/90/60 e ZeIS J8Y NOIN
00';0 ~4000 00:0 000 |4tb SPO 6EFb PEE 000 (0) CNP €- p< McS61022Z0 =p802 91 Lb SH S0'8 26/01/60 t) 18S J8H NOIN
000 000 000 000 |jS8ry OFO sos Sob 000 0 EVP € p< M6S6'10 220 SEE0Z 91 Ir S1H 90:8 26/01/60 p 18S J8Y NOIN
000 000 000 000 |86€ 620 EP ese 00°0 0 Ep € p< M1t68'1022Z0 cOLOZ 91 Ir SH eb:ct 26/90/60 i) Leis 8H NOIN
00°0 +000 000 000 |92% 620 O6F lor 000 0 J{E%F € p< MIZ6102Z0 ~OZ91 Ip SIH tk:et 26/90/60 q LBS j8HY NOIN
000 000 000 00:0 |ShZ cB8O 982 POL 00:0 0 {&%F € b< MEZ610220 LO60Z91 1b SIH Otel 26/90/60 e Leis j84 NOIN
ueaW wnwixey wnwiulyy ealy jueay ebuey wnuwixey wnuwiuly | iajaweig junoD] apo, wnwixeyy wnwiuly ealy jeu
SSauyoys jeayey pebpag
uonenauag erawed
s}sejopnyw
Jolew
(ud) azig ujesD
jeuojssaoons
SGNLIONO1
SONLLV1 LSATIVNV SWIL
ayeq | ‘day uojers jpunow
é}| O4}81 “aqny ws gbe) jays “qay Ayoyed ‘uaBAxo mo] Ajjeied juaique
Ayoyedqurey Gd ‘yewaqny dwiy dn-paddu ‘6e] jeys!juaiquie
eosijedwiy oseds ‘nods pns!pues you-|jeys ‘juaquie
|| 04}8 ‘Syew aqn) dn-paddu ‘6e] jjeys 's uaique
yew eqn) eosijadwy dn-paddu ‘be, |jays ‘juaique
jure} dy ‘Beynoosym pues you-|jays ‘6e] jays uaique
éyew eqn) eosiedwy '{6uueaws sedi ‘yuaique
SpIOA Builped} ‘yew eqn) eosijadwiy dn-paddu ‘jueique
yew! eqn) dn-paddu ‘uidap ye pion Bulpasy ‘syoejpe sadim ‘Z)uaique
sagn) uns ws ‘He| j}eys ‘yw/Sjuaiqwe ‘ued moyjeys
yew eqn) ‘pues you-|jays ‘juaique
yew aqn) eosijedwy dn-paddu‘pns ye 61; pue Ge jjays ‘juaique
éSPIOA Buipae; Tsodep Bulpaay/moung juaique
UNS UO JSejOpNw 'W/S uaiquie
pion Buipaaytunoos pins ‘6e| |jays soul! yy/S‘juaiquie
Wg Je WOM ‘syewagn) podiydwe ‘jwyq/pues 4g ‘juaique
E[100Y'soqny eoesijaduy ‘sjoejiye sadim ‘uaiquie
4JNOOS Ns JOUIW ‘(~spodiydwe Anf)saqn) ns ws!yy/sjuaique
él] O18 “nods pins ‘Ayoyed Qdy ‘juaique
MOO ‘gjuaseid spodiydwiy !sjoeje sadim ‘juaique
yew eqn) podiydwe dn-paddugaqny sniajdojyaeyy ‘w/S{juaique
He) |}eys JouIW ‘uo saqny podiydwe ‘umop-Besp ‘wyq/pues 4g yuaique
I] ONOY ‘yew eqn) eosijaduuiy dn-paddu ‘unoos pns ‘yuaique
ENONOY !(jwUUad< -WW9g)WIOM By ‘yWy/S‘juaiquie
Ns uO Saqn) podiydwy !wuoM/M PIOA Hulpagy ‘pues 4q ‘juaiquie
él] O8Y ‘yNs uo syew aqn) podiydwe dn-paddu ‘juaique
yidep wo 72 Wiom!({spodiydwe)seqn) ns ws‘,sjoRjipe sedim-qdqy pajjow ‘juaique
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
AWOISAHd
ooooocooocoe0ce°o
ooooo0oo0oo0o0c0o°o0°o0°0o
ooooo0ooooo0o00°o
WOISAHd 0 8 0 0
WOISAHd 0 8 0 0
WOISAHd 0 6 0 0
LAGNI 0 S sos
WOISAHd 0 Z 0 0
WOISAHd 0 Z 0 0
WOISAHd ) Z 0 0
WOISAHd 0 v 0 0
WOISAHd 0 Z 0 0
LAGNI 0 9 81'S ele
WOISAHd 0 VN 0 0
WOISAHd 0 Z 0 0
OSINADOI8 0 8 te} 0
WOISAHd 0 S 0 0
LAOGNI 0 9 0 0
élBuoIsola ‘smuajoOVaeYyD 'W/S juaique
(éspodiydwe ‘an!)yins uo saqn) ws ‘W/S!juaique
spodiyduwe |iuaAn{ jo yew aqny'ws ‘juaique
épa|ddu'spion Buipasy ws ‘yewaqn) ,eosijeduiy ‘pues iq ‘juaique
yewaqn) eosijadwy dn-peddi ‘|) o1ay ‘Suns uo ssei6 jaa ‘pues 4g ‘juaique
éll ONaY ‘apejq ssei6 jaa peap ‘juaique
aqn) pins ws ‘Be; jays ‘uadsapun ‘}juaique
él| O4Jay ‘ued MojjeUs ‘UaIque
“‘punog QdH Mo|aq WOM Ul) ‘yeWeqn) podiyduy An[‘joeje sadim:;/S ‘juaiqwe
JoeRje sedim ‘Zumop-Beip/mouing ‘yew aqn) dn-paddu ‘jays ejnpidei5 ‘juaiquwe
pion Bulpaas‘wuom'pjalj-se) sruajdojaeyg'seqn) ws gunoos pns‘y/s!juaique
pas ul sape|q sses6 jaa peap ‘uad<qdy ‘pues sq ‘juaique
6e| jjays ‘pues ug ‘juaiqwe
éll0ay ‘epejq sseiB jaa peap !uad mojyeys ‘juaique
él) O1J0Y Huey AWaA Gd ‘ued mojeys ‘juaique
sseiBjae peap jo sapeiq z ‘aqny smuajdojaeuZ ‘6e| jjays soulw ‘juaique
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
sjusWwWO9
oa
Moy
aouequnysig
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
SINADOId
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
LAGNI
SINADOId
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
WOISAHd
LAGNI
AWOISAHd
ocoooooc0c0o0co0o0c0o0 coo
ocooooo0c0co0co0o0c00c0 ccc co
cooooo0c0o0o0o0c00c 0c ccc 0
sco o0vToOBHosmnHovds)sDdoOo
ealy ‘Joy
/punow
ueeyy “XeW ‘UIW
punoqgey xopey
unwixeyW wnuwiuly) ealy
ssSauyo|4L Gd Jugseddy
eoeyns} eueurew {iSO ‘day uoness
B5d
Reference Areas 1998
0 0 0 0 6S6 trl tedol 488 0 cOE 2 p< WLS] Mztb 90220 NOZ@9l lb SOW OS:bL 86/0E/20 @ 80445YM 39Y-1S89M
0 0 0 (0) c89 c6O Bel 9e°9 0 ZOE 2 p< 1JSGNI] M6E0'90 220 NZOZ91 lh SOW 8E:bl 86/0E/Z0 9D 2O45SHM 39H-1S8M
0 (0) 0 0 469 IpO BIZ 4L£9 0 cE 2 p< IAQNI] Mz2S0'90220 N602 91 lth SON SEbI 86/0E/Z0 @ 4O45YM = 49H-1S8M)
0 0 0 0 6SS ¢cB0 9 BLS 0 COE 2 p< 4I3SQNI] M9P0'90 220 NOLC9l lh SOW VEvI 86/08/20 V LOS3SHM = $8H-1S8M
(0) 0 0) 0 €1e 280 998 692 0 Ep € p< WLS] MZ68°SO0 220 NS90°91 tp SIH 02:6 86/10/80 4d 9043HM = $9H71S8M
(0) 0 0 0 eLZL 801 928 BI 0 ENpr € p< OL TLS} Mpss'so 220 NZ9091 tp SIH 02:6 86/10/80 3 9045HM = 39H71S8M
te) 0 0 0 9V8 Sl €26 692 0 ENF € p< MO068'S0 220 NbZO9l tb SIH 81:6 86/10/80 GQ 9043HM 39H-1S8M
(0) 0 0 (0) 6S6 c8O0 OF 816 0 Ep € p< M0z090 2240 NOP29l tb STH 42:6 86/10/80 3 SOASHM J8Y-1S9M
0 0 0 0 bel 990 8 el 28 ct 0 CVF € p< ME€z0'90 220 NESZ9l lb SOW EFFI 86/08/20 9 SOSSHM = 38H-1S9M
0 0 0 0 sect Bt ec el cele 0 ENF € p< M22z0'90 2240 N6bc29l lb SOW eb-hl 86/0E/20 @ SOA3SHM _ J9Y-1S9M
0 (0) 0 (0) 9r2 20 182 hed (e) 0 € M96 10220 N¢S99lL th SOW 8t:bl 86/0/20 9D vOdHIN J9Y NOIN
0 0 0 0) vel GGO I92 90°2 0 0 € MZP6102Z0 NESOOIL IP SOW ZI-bt 86/0/20 @ vOdHIN J9Y NOIN
0 0 0 0 909 SEO E29 88S 0 0 € MtS6102Z0 N8S991 lb SOW ZI:bt 86/0/20 Vv vOSHIN J9H NOIN
(¢) 0 0 0 48S 80 429 Lvs 0 0 € M960'20 220 NOSO'9IL 1b SOW 2-Ll 86/0E/20 3 €04HIN 39H NOIN
0 0 0 0 v byl elp 82€ 0 0 € Mz60'20 220 NZS9'91 1b SOW €E2:1t 86/0E/20 @ €04H1N 19H NOIN
0 0 0 0 629 Ol eZ 229 0 0 € M160'20 220 NE999I 1b SOW 22-bl 86/0€/20 VY €04H1N 198 NOIN
0 0 0 0 662 101 668 6h 2 0 0 € MIS6102Z0 N8S99I 1b SOW El:tt 86/08/20 9 2OdHIN J8H NOIN
0 0 0 (0) SEttL SBO IB S60 0 (¢) € MtS6'1022Z0 N8S991 1b SOW ci:tl 86/0€/20 @ cOSHIN 38H NOIN
0 0 0 0 p62 Itt 6¢8 6e2 0 0 € M1S6'10220 N8S991 1h SOW LLL 86/08/20 Vv cO4dHIN J8H NOIN
0 0 0 0 8S SSO 809 ess 0 0 € MtS6102Z0 N8S991 1h SOW 0:11 86/0€/20 OD tO4dHIN 19H NOTIN
0 0 0 0 1S9 SEO 899 ee 9 0 0 € MtS6'102Z0 N8S991 1h SOW ¥0:11 86/08/20 @ +tOdHIN 18H NOIN
0 0 0 0 6S S€0 809 el 0 0 € MtS610220 N8S99l lh SOW €0:11 86/0€/20 V__tO4H1N 394 NOIN
0 0 0 0 0 0 @ Mbbe'e0 220 Nbsg'ol 86/0€/L0 Oo €ldyANn
0 (0) 0 0 0 0 rd M9PE £0220 NBZ99L 1b SOW 6E:tt 86/08/20 @ €ldyan j9H-3N
0 0 0 (0) 0 (e) € MSEE'EO ZZ0 N6Z99IL IP SOW G6E:1t 86/08/20 Vv €1jyH4aNn j9Y-3N
0 0 0 (0) 0 0 b MbZ€€0 220 N9Z991 tb SIH 61:8 86/10/80 3 ¢ctldy3Nn J9H-3N
0 0 0) 0 (0) 0 € MO8E'€0 220 NI8991 1b SIH 81:8 86/10/80 GQ ¢@ldy5Nn j9H-3N
0 0 0 (0) 0 (0) 2Z MO6EE0 220 NEZ991 1b SOW 00:21 86/0€/20 Oo 2@t4dy3aNn 48H-3N
0 0 (0) 0 (¢) 0 € MtZS€0220 NOPZ91 1b SOW 60:21 86/0€/20 DO tlay3N §9Y-3N
0 0 0 0 0 0 € MS9S'€02Z0 NipZ9l lb SOW 80:21 86/0€/20 @ ttdy3aNn J9H-4N
0 0 (0) (0) 0 0 @ MZSS€02Z0 NbpZ9l lb SOW 20:2! 86/0/20 V itdHSN J8H-SN
0 (0) 0 0 0 0 € M9l€€0 220 Neld9l lb SIH St:8 86/10/80 3 ObsHAN J9H-3N
0 10) 10) 10) 10} 0 € MS2EE0 220 N6IZ91 Ib SOW ¢l:8 86/10/80 GQ OyAaN j9Y-IN
0 0 0 0 0 0 € MSZE'€0 220 NSIZ91 lb SOW FEe:tt 86/0/20 V OldHAN J8Y-SN
0 0 (0) (0) 0 0 @ Mtc€€0 220 NeS99l th SOW bbl 86/08/20 9D 604YH4SN j9Y-3N
0 0 0 0 0 0 @ MEzE€0 220 N8S99t 86/0€/Z0 @ 604H4SN J8Y-3N
0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Mte€e' £0 220 NI99 91 86/0€/20 V__604H3N
ueeW wnuixeyy WwnwiUiW Realy jueayy ebuey wnwixeyy wnwiuIy | Jejowelg yunog]epoyy wnwixeyy wnwiuW ebeys ealy ‘J9Y
SSoUHd|YL [EWAeW Pabpaiq uopesjeuad es0WIeD sysejopny)] soley (ud) ezig ues] jeuo}ssa99NS| AGNLIDNOT AGNLILVT ASATVWNV AWIL ea | ‘day uoneIsS jpunow
Z ® HSWH 173HS ‘LHNOODS 'SGIOUGAH ‘SNLIN130 OYO ‘Z1VW GOdIHdNV O31HOS HOOd ONS: 41350NI
80434M
Z ® HSVH 173HS ‘JHUNS ® SOVHS 113HS 'G31LHOS HOOd ‘anws' WOISAHd 20334M
Z ® HSVH 113HS 'SOVYS TISHS ‘LYW3ENL dN-G3ddly ‘OSLHOS ATHOOd ‘GNWS' WOISAHd 20433UM
Z ® HSVH 113HS ‘OVIUNODS 'SOVYS 113HS ‘SNINL30 OYO ‘O31LNOS ATHOOd ‘GNWs' WOISAHd Z0435UM
INOHONOYHL HSWH 173HS 'SGIOUGAH ‘LVW38NL dn-G3ddi¥ 'G3LHOS GOW ‘anv WWOISAHd 90435YUM
INOHONOWHL HOVH 113HS 'S3GVIESSVUD 133 GV30 'UNOOS SUNS 'G3.1YOS-GOW ‘anv WOISAHd 9033UM
LNOHONOYH! HSVH 113HS 'G3YNOODS ‘LVWAENL dN-Gaddi¥ 3SN30 ‘G31NOS 173M ‘BNY; WOISAHd 90435YHM
INOHONOYH! HSVH 113HS 'H1d3d@S3YNINVIY3O 'GIOA 'LWW38NL dN-Gaddly 'G31YOS GOW ‘aNY OINSDOIa SO43UM
Z @ HSWH 113HS "CHNODS 'SNLIYL30 OHO ‘G31HOS HOOd ‘SISV19 H3dIM ‘GNWs' WOISAHd
SOJSUM
Z @ HSWH 113HS '¢HNOOS 'GIONGAH ‘SNIY.L30 OHO 'GIOA 'O31HOS HOOd ‘NWS’ SINSDOI8
SO4A3YUM
oeoooo0oo0o00090
————
30V18 SSVHO 133 Gv30 G31NOS GOW ONWS” OINSDOI98 vOdUIN
a. “CO3UNOOS ‘31LHOS GOW ‘1SV¥19 Y3diM ‘ONWS' OSINSDOI8 POSH IN
'SLVW 38N1 dN-GaddIy ‘O31HOS GOW ‘anWs' WOISAHd vOIH1N
'LO3YNOOS 'Z @ SOVHS NFHS ‘UNS © 13HS 'O31HOS GOW ‘anws' WOISAHd €0401N
‘Q31ddI¥ ‘OFYNODS ‘SUNS @ OVI TSH ‘GIOA SSOd 'ONIN3dO MOHUNS ‘O31HOS GOW ‘anws' , WOISAHd €04Y1N
‘CXOINB 'H1d30 @ SOVUS TI3HS 'GIOA ‘G3YNODS 'G31HOS GOW ‘aNWs' WOISAHd C04 1N
“AHNS © SNLIN130 DUO 'SLVW GOdIHdNV ‘G31HOS GOW 'anWws'
‘O31HOS GOW ‘tWO O3EuNISIG ATLN393Y ‘GNWWS'
“OVS 113HS 'IOA SSOd ‘LWW 38NL ‘31HOS GOW ‘anWws'
‘AYNS ® SNLIHLAG ONO 'SLVW 38NL ‘G3LNOS GOW ‘anws'
‘AYNS ® SN1LIH130 ONO 'SIVW 38N1L 'G31HOS GOW ‘d<s'
"CO3YNOOS '113HS ‘SUNS @ SNLIN13G OO 'G31NOS GOW 'd<s'
2044 1N
04H 1N
2O4H1N
403H1N
4034 1N
tO4N1N
ooooo0oo0ooo0o0oo0ceo
cooooo0oo0ocoo0ooco
cooooocooe0oeoco
oooo0o0000000°0
oO ONDOInOTONON Oornnon
z a
‘lW¥39000d ‘GIOWGAH 'S/N1IN130 DYO Gatddid OJLYOS GOW OnWwsS:
“LOATddIY 'SGIOUGAH 'SNLIH130 YO ‘3140S GOW ‘aNWs'
‘O3HNOOS ‘4UNS © OVYS 113HS ‘MOUYNE SSOd 'G31HOS GOW ‘anws'
‘SGIOHOAH 'SGIOA ONIG33S ‘LYW38NL dN-G3ddI¥ ‘G3LHOS-113M ‘GNW Ye@/48 ‘3S DIGI47NS ‘av!
“US38N1L SHNS ‘ONW HAA ‘OAS J10/47NS ‘anv
"0014 OHO 'SGIONGAH 'LVW3ENL dN-O3ddi¥ 'G3LHOS GOW ‘anyws'!
"H1d30 LV S3UNLOVYS ‘SNY31d0135¥HO NO SGIOUGAH 'G31YOS GOW ‘GnwWws'
€lduSN
€b4Y3N
€tdy3aN
e@+4u4Nn
@bdy4Nn
cLduAN
}LaY3SN
z
o
Use
+
oooo00000000000
xeionounonwooroornr a
coo0onooocqcowmwoo0ose
oooomooooonoocoeo
"SGIOHOAH 'SGIOA 'tSH1VLS GOdIHdN ‘031HOS GOW ‘anWs' WOISAHd bhdu3N
"LG3YNODS 'SN1IN130 OHO 'LSHIVLS GOdIHdW ‘G3LHOS GOW ‘anws' 130NI thdu3N
"HNOODS SUNS ‘1 O8L3Y 'GNW H8/L1S YB ‘BAY WOISAHd OLJHSN
“SHW1S. O1IH390GOd'HNODS JYNS'S38N1 VOSIAdNY WS'GNW YES Ya'anv WOISAHd 7 S Ol4dY43SN
“LWW 3801 GOdIHdWy 'G31YOS GOW ‘anws' SIN3SD018 Ol4H3N
“LVW SNL dN-O3ddi¥ ‘O31HOS GOW ‘anWws' WOISAHd 604Y3N
“LVN 38NL dN-O3ddly ‘O31LYOS GOW '1SV10 H3dIM ‘GnWws' 603Y35N
"G3 ddid ‘SOVU4 173HS 'SGIONGAH ‘G31HOS GOW 'S1S¥ 19 Y3dIM ‘ONWS' N 60443N
souequnisig WnwixeW Wwnwiulyy Bay fueayy Key “UW
sjuawwo) eoepyns A SSOUHIIUL Gd jUaseddy| punoqgay xopay| ‘day uo))e1s
Soren
See Pm
i
Sepon
a eet
WOT Pe 443 Acs
= 2g Raa pepe ET
aera’ mime aes
— =
” r
a
. - :
3 =] vu
9 2 e — an :
@ = ines oe
2 P Sus See
; 5 i oe
w p es ot 4
iy
: i
a .
i Sie
i
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11