Skip to main content

Full text of "Montana mosquitoes"

See other formats


5 


Vector  Control  Bulletin  Nd.  4 


March  1974 


i  20  77 


MONTANA 
H€4C)IJIT€IS 


Part  n     Survey    and  Ground 
Applied    Chemical  Control 


MONTANA  DEPARTMENT  OF  HEALTH  AND  ENVIRONMENTAL  SCIENCES 
Environmental  Sciences  Division 
Environmental  Services  Bureau 
Helena,  Montana 


Montana  State  Library 


3  0864  1006  5710  8 


MONTANA  MOSQUITOES,  PART  II— SURVEY  AND  GROUND  APPLIED  CHEMICAL  CONTROL 

Table  of  Contents 


I.     Philosophy  .  ■   l 

II.     Mosquito  Biology  -  Some  Practical  Implications    1 

III.     Classification  of  Breeding  Places  — ■  3 

IV.     Mosquito  Surveys  -•   3 

A.  Original  Basic  Survey    3 

B.  Operational  Surveys    3 

1.     Larval  Surveys  — ■  4- 

2  .     Adult  Surveys  — •  4 

V.     Methods  of  Control  14 

A.  Source  Reduction    n 

B.  Pre-larviciding    5 

C.  Larviciding    5 

D.  Adult iciding    5 

E.  Biological  Control    6 

VI.     Chemicals  for  Mosquito  Control    6 

VII.     Equipment  for  Ground  Application    8 

A.  Introduction    8 

B.  Types  of  Larviciding  Equipment    8 

C.  Types  of  Adult iciding  Equipment    9 

D.  Equipment  Selection  10 

VIII.     Chemical  Application  10 

A.  Equipment  Calibration  10 

B,  Standardizing  Application  Rates   11 


C.  Computation  of  Acreage   12 

1.  For  Larviciding  12 

2.  For  Adult  ic  id  ing  13 

D.  Formulations   13 

E.  Determining  Amount  of  Mixed  Chemical  Needed   14 

F.  Computation  of  Dosage  Rates   14 

1.  For  liquid  formulations  given  lbs/gal  of 
active  ingredient  14 

2.  For  liquid  formulations  given  percent  of  a 
active  ingredient  or  specific  gravity   15 

3.  For  granules  and  dusts  15 

G.  Methods  of  Varying  the  Dosage  Rate  15 

1.  Adjusting  formulation  strength   16 

2.  Varying  speed  of  travel   16 

3.  Varying  the  discharge  rate  17 


MONTANA  DEPARTMENT  OF  HEALTH  AND  ENVIRONMENTAL  SCIENCES 
Environmental  Sciences  Division 
Environmental  Services  Bureau 
Helena,  Montana 


MONTANA  MOSQUITOES,  PART  II— SURVEY  £  GROUND  APPLIED  CHEMICAL  CONTROL 


I .  Philosophy 

It  is  necessary  to  understand  the  life  cycle  and  habits  of  mosquito  species  in 
order  to  effectively  and  efficiently  control  mosquito  populations.     Detailed  surveys 
are  essential  for  the  planning,  operation  and  evaluation  of  control  programs.  Survey 
and  evaluation  are  continuing  processes  that  must  accompany  control,     A  basic  tenet 
for  mosquito  control  is  that  only  by  treatment  of  cause  (larval  mosquito  habitat) 
rather  than  effect  (mosquito  populations)  can  a  problem  become  less  severe..     For  this 
reason  and  since  mosquitoes  require  shallow  standing  water  for  development,  good 
water  management  practices /source  reduction  methods  are  the  preferred  approaches  in 
mosquito  control.-     As  a  practical  matter,  the  use  of  chemicals  will  be  required  for 
the  temporary  suppression  of  mosquito  populations.     Chemical  control  should  assume 
less  importance  as  source  reduction  programs  develop.     In  all  cases,  the  least 
environmentally  disrupting  approach  to  mosquito  control  should  be  used. 

Control  programs  conducted  by  mosquito  control  districts  organized  under  state 
enabling  legislation  (R.C=M.  1947,  15-1+201  through  16-4214)  have  been  the  most 
effective.     Districts  thus  organized  have  more  program  continuity,  higher  levels  of 
financing  and  a  more  reliable  source  of  financial  support.     These  advantages  make 
environmentally  sound  source  reduction  and  larviciding  programs  easier  to  attain. 

The  vector  control  specialist  of  the  Environmental  Services  Bureau  may  be  contacted 
for  technical  advice,  information  or  assistance  in  forming  mosquito  control  districts 
or  for  reviewing  and  consultation  upon  mosquito  control  programs  and  problems.  A 
pesticide  applicators  license,  obtainable  from  the  Pesticide  Control  Division  of  the 
State  Department  of  Agriculture,  is  required  by  all  commercial  and  government  applica- 
tors who  supervise  the  application  of  pesticides. 

II .  Mosquito  Biology  -  Some  Practical  Implications 

There  are  43  species  of  mosquitoes  in  Montana  distributed  among  six  genera  (Aedes, 
Anopholes,  Culex,  Culiseta,  Coquilletidia  and  Psorophora).     Vector  Control  Bulletin  #1, 
Montana  Mosquitoes,  Part  I— Identification  and  Biology  (obtainable  from  the  Department 
of  Health)  may  be  consulted  for  detailed  information.     The  most  common  mosquitoes  are 
Aedes  species.     Most  control  efforts  are  directed  at  this  group.    The  other  common 
genera  are  Culex  and  Culiseta.    The  mosquito  species  Culex  tarsalis  is  of  public  health 
importance  in  Montana  because  it  is  the  principle  vector  of  human  and  equine  encephali- 
tis.    Other  species  have  also  been  found  to  be  naturally  infected  with  the  virus 
causing  this  disease. 

All  mosquito  species  have  four  distinct  stages  in  their  life  cycle:     the  egg, 
the  larva  (wiggler),  the  pupa  (tumbler)  and  the  adult.     The  first  three  stages  require 
water  for  development.     Eggs  of  all  species  (except  Aedes  and  Psoiophora  species)  and 
all  larvae  and  pupae  will  die  if  they  are  out  of  water.     (Pupae  can  survive  for  short 
periods  in  a  moist  environment.)    For  this  reason,  source  reduction  (draining,  ditching, 
filling,  etc.)  is  effective  at  controlling  mosquitoes.     (See  Section  III,  Classifica- 
tion of  Breeding  Places). 

-1~ 


Aedes  and  Psorophora  species  normally  lay  their  eggs  in  the  mud  along  receding 
waters.     (One  rare  Aedes  species  lays  its  eggs  above  the  water  line  in  tree  holes  or 
containers)      Eggs  of  some  Aedes  species  will  hatch  if  the  site  is  flooded  again  that 
season,  others  must  be  subjected  to  cold  before  they  will  hatch.     Hence  some  species 
have  only  one  generation  each  year;  others  may  have  several  generations.     Aedes  are 
a  temporary  water  mosquitCi  implying  that  they  are  produced  in  water  which  is  retained 
on  the  surface  for  a  minimum  of  about  7  days  but  which  disappears  during  the  course 
of  the  season..    They  may  also  be  found  in  permanent  or  semi-permanent  bodies  of  water 
which  have  periodic  fluctuations  in  water  levels.    Water  which  has  little  fluctuation 
in  water  level  will  produce  few  Aedes „    Eggs  of  some  Aedes  species  retain  the  ability 
to  hatch  if  flooded  even  after  a  period  of  5  yeai's  on  dry  land,,    Hence  two  or  three 
dry  years  do  not  solve  most  mosquito  problemso     Several  years  which  are  successively 
drier  will  result  in  se'-'eral  egg  lines  below  the  high  water  mark.     If  all  egg  lines 
were  then  flooded,  a  much  larger  than  normal  hatch  could  occur,    Aedes  over-winter  in 
the  egg  stage. 

Eggs  of  The  Culex  and  Culiseta  species  are  laid  in  rafts  on  the  surface  of  per- 
manent or  semi -permanent  bodies  of  water.    Eggs  of  Anopholes  species  are  laid  singly 
on  the  water  surface,,    Eggs  of  these  permanent  water  mosquitoes  must  have  water 
continuously  ^o  remain  viable,,     Whi.le  Coquilletidia  over-winter  in  the  larval  stage, 
the  Culex,  Cuiiseta,  and  Anopholes  species  ovex^-winter  in  the  adult  stage  in  sheltered 
sites,     Since  there  is  a  high  mortality  of  adults  of  these  species  during  the  winter, 
populations  of  these  species  do  not  usually  build  up  until  later  in  the  season.  The 
permanent  water  mosquitoes  typically  have  several  generations  each  year.- 

Water  temperature  is  the  most  critical  factor  in  the  hatching  of  eggs  and  in 
the  time  required  for  development «    Eggs  of  the  predominant  Aedes  species  may  hatch 
when  the  daily  a'-rer'age  water  temperature  reaches  about  50°  but  they  do  not  hatch  in 
large  numbers  tint  II  the  daily  average  water  temperature  approaches  70°  F.  Besides 
water  temperature,  the  i?atft  of  larval  development  depends  on  the  species  and  amount 
of  nutrien^  ,a»aiIableo     Ldrvai  and  pupal  development  may  be  completed  in  as  little  as 
5  days  (moie  likely  ?  or  8  days)  in  hot  weather  or  development  may  take  3  weeks  when 
the  water  temperature  is  cooler. 

Larvae  pass  through  4  developmental  instars  (stages),  molting  or  shedding  their 
skin  at  the  end  of  each  ir.star  in  order  to  grow.     Fourth  instar  larvae  become  pupae 
with  the  next  molt»     Re."  ognit  ion  of  the  instar  that  larvae  are  in  is  of  practical 
importance.     More  time  is  available  for  an  operator  to  larvicide  if  earlier  instars 
are  detected      Less  ir!i.?;ecticide  is  required  to  kill  3rd  instar  larvae  than  iith  instar 
la.rvae„     Pupae  are  mc-ir-e  tolerant  to  attack  by  .insecticide  and  control  is  apt  to  be 
less  effect  I''?  it  larvae  ,ar'e  allowed  to  pupateo    All  larvae  (except  Coquilletidia, 
which  is  fairly  rare)  w;ist  come  to  the  surface  to  breathe:    hence  xhe  effectiveness 
of  oils  which  foul  the  breathing  apparatus  and  cut  off  the  air  supply. 

The  adult  mosquitoes  feed  mainly  at  night j  being  most  active  at  dawn  and  at 
dusk,     A  few  Aedes  species  will  attack  during  broad  daylight  (especially  if  disturbed) 
but  most  prefer  shaded  situations  if  they  bite  at  all  during  daylight  hours.  Different 
mosquito  species  show  different  host  preferences,     Culex  tarsalis ,  the  common  encepha- 
litis mosqui+Oj  readily  bites  man  but  prefers  to  feed  on  birds,     Culex  territans 
feeds  exclusively  on  reptiles  and  amphib,ians ,„ 

The  normal  flight  range  of  most  Anopholes,  Culex  and  Culiseta  species  is  usually 
considered  to  be  one  mile  or  less.     However,  studies  have  shown  that  Culex  tarsalis 
commonly  fly  from  3  to  10  miles,  especially  when  seeking  shelter  in  the  fall.  Most 
Aedes  species  are  strong  fliers  and  range  several  miles  from  their  breeding  places, 

_.2" 


Individuals  have  been  recaptured  over  20  miles  from  their  release  site  but  most  range 
three  miles  or  less.    Mosquitoes  will  normally  fly  no  further  from  their  breeding 
sites  than  is  necessary  to  feed. 

°     Classification  of  Mosquito  Breeding  Places 

Not  all  water  produces  mosquitoes.     Shallow,  standings  sometimes  stagnant  water 
which  has  emergent  vegetation  (that  protects  larvae)  and  bodies  of  water  which  have 
gradual  sloping  banks  are  of  primary  concern.     Large  open  expanses  of  water  which 
are  subject  to  wave  action,  ponds  which  have  abrupt  banks  and  little  emergent  vegeta- 
tion and  running  water  usually  produce  few  mosquitoes.     As  indicated  earlier,  water 
with  little  fluctuation,  in  levels  produces  few  Aedes  species. 

Mosquito  breeding  places  may  be  classed  as  temporary,  permanent  or  semi-permanent. 
Temporary  breeding  pools  remain  for  a  limited  period  of  time  follov/ing  each  flooding. 
Permanent  water  remains  throughout  the  year.     Semi-permanent  water  areas  remain 
throughout  most  or  all  of  a  mosquito  season  following  an  initial  flooding. 

Mosquito  breeding  places  may  also  be  classified  as  to  their  location.  They 
may  be  classified  as  on  field  (including  surface  pools,  irrigation  laterals  and 
drains)  or  off  field  (including  road  side  ditches,  or  borrow  pits,  waste  land  areas, 
abandoned  canals  and  laterals,  drainage  ditches,  natural  waterways,  oxbows,  sloughs 
and  distribution  systems).     Over  95  percent  of  the  total  breeding  area  was  associated 
with  "on  field"  mosquito  breeding  places  in  one  irrigated  area  studied  in  Montana. 
These  accounted  for  over  70  percent  of  all  mosquito  production  during  the  entire 
season.     Thus  in  most  areas  suffering  from  severe  mosquito  infestations,  more  than 
90  percent  of  all  mosquito  production  may  be  associated  with  the  use  of  water  for 
irrigation..     In  non- irrigated  areas,  spring  run-off  and  a  rising  water  table  account 
for  higher  percentage  of  the  mosquitoes  produced. 

IV.     Mosquito  Surveys 

Two  types  of  surveys  are  widely  used:    the  original  basic  survey  and  the  opera- 
tional survey. 

A.  Original  Basic  Survey.     The  original  basic  survey  determines  the  species  of 
mosquitoes,  their  source,  location  and  seasonal  density.     Mosquito  control  maps 

are  used  for  orientation  and  locating  larval  breeding  places  and  adult  sampling 
stations o     When  making  the  original  basic  survey,  it  is  advisable  to  record  the  type 
of  breeding  place  and,  if  known,  the  number  of  expected  generations  of  mosquitoes 
(e.g.  temporary,  on-field  (alfalfa),  3  generations).     This  information  is  of  value  for 
estimating  the  expected  seasonal  breeding  acreage  that  would  have  to  be  treated  each 
year  (as  opposed  to  the  amount  of  acreage  that  can  produce  mosquitoes)  and  for 
estimating  the  types  of  control  measures  that  may  be  used,  the  number  of  personnel 
needed,  type  of  equipment  and  amount  and  type  of  insecticide. 

B.  Operational  Surveys.     The  operational  survey  is  a  continuing  evaluation  of 
the  mosquito  control  program  and  is  extremely  valuable  in  daily  operations.  Through 
operational  surveys,  one  refines  information  on  control  efficiency,  the  times  that 
larvae  appear  in  each  source,  and  the  significance  of  each  larval  source  according 
to  the  production  indexes.     Such  surveys  determine  the  population  index  (showing 
general  fluctuations  rather  than  determing  the  actual  numbers  of  mosquitoes  present). 
Operational  surveys  may  be  larval  or  adult  mosquito  surveys. 


-3- 


lo    Larval  Surveys =    In  conducting  larval  surveys,  a  dipper  approximately 
U  inches  in  diameter  is  scooped  fairly  through  the  surface  of  water  near  emergent 
vegetation.    Aedes  larvae  are  collected  by  a  rapid  skimming  movement  of  the  dipper 
with  one  side  depressed  below  the  water  surface,  ending  the  stroke  just  as  the 
dipper  is  filled.    Where  clumps  of  emergent  vegetation  are  present,  it  is  easiest 
to  collect  Anopholes  larvae  by  pressing  the  dipper  into  such  clumps  with  one  edge 
depressed  so  that  the  water  flows  from  the  vegetation  into  the  dipper.    A  quicker 
motion  is  required  for  collection  of  Culicine  larvae  (Aedes,  Culex,  Culiseta  and 
Psorophora)  than  for  collections  of  Anopholes  larvae  since  the  Culicine  larvae  are 
more  likely  to  dive  below  the  surface  when  disturbed  by  shadows  or  movement.  The 
number  of  dips  made  and  the  number  of  larvae  found  are  recorded  in  order  to  calculate 
a  breeding  index.    The  breeding  index  may  be  defined  as  the  number  of  larvae  per 
square  foot  of  water  surface.    Therefore,  the  number  of  larvae  collected  divided  by 
the  number  of  times  that  "4  dips  are  taken  equals  the  breeding  index  (BI  =  #  larvae  * 
#  dips  (h) '    Unless  the  mosquito  production  source  is  very  large,  a  mosquito  breeding 
index  of  less  than  1  is  not  normally  controlled.     One  can  determine  the  relative 
importance  of  each  breeding  site  or  station  by  calculating  the  production  index  (breed- 
ing index  X  the  area  =  production  index  of  the  site  or  station).    Both  pre-treatment 
and  post-treatment  larval  counts  should  be  made,  when  possible,  in  order  to  determine 
control  efficiency. 

2.     Adult  Surveys.    Adult  surveys  may  be  biting  collections,  resting  collections, 
or  light  trap,  carbon  dioxide  or  baited  trap  collections.    Adult  mosquito  surveys 
provide  inforaation  on  (1)  the  species  present,  (2)  the  mosquito  population  density, 
(3)  the  effectiveness  of  the  control  efforts  throughout  the  season  and  (4)  a  means 
of  evaluating  the  effectiveness  of  specific  treatments.    Adult  light  trap  collections 
depend  upon  a  phototropic  response.    Mosquito  species  differ  in  their  response  to 
light;  some  being  attracted  readily,  others  poorly.    After  being  attracted  to  the 
light;  a  fan  is  usually  employed  to  blow  the  mosquitoes  into  a  bag  or  killing  jar. 
Biting  collections  are  carried  out  by  capturing  the  adult  female  mosquito  with  an 
aspirator  as  she  attempts  to  obtain  a  blood  meal  from  a  host.    When  making  population 
estimates  with  the  bite  count  method,  a  predetermined  time  period  is  established. 
The  count  per  given  period  that  will  be  tolerated  by  residents  in  an  area  varies  from 
region  to  region  and  must  be  determined  for  each  area.    Biting  and  light  trap  collections 
are  the  most  common  forms  of  adult  surveys.    Resting  station  collections  are  made  by 
aspirating  the  adults  which  remain  inactive  during  the  day,  resting  in  cool,  humid 
places.    Resting  stations  may  be  in  such  sites  as  stables,  chicken  houses,  culverts, 
and  so  forth.    Egg  samples  or  egg-sod  surveys  are  not  typically  made  in  Montana  but 
have  been  employed  in  large  districts  as  a  part  of  pre-larviciding  operations, 

V.    Methods  of  Control 

All  methods  of  mosquito  control  require  surveys  to  insure  success.    A  number  of 
general  methods  are  employed.    In  order  of  preference,  they  are  good  water  management, 
source  reduction,  biological  control,  larviciding,  pre-larviciding,  and  adulticiding. 
The  one  instance  in  which  adulticiding  should  provide  the  basis  of  a  control  project 
is  in  the  event  of  an  outbreak  of  mosquito-borne  diseases ,  such  as  St ,  Louis 
encephalitis  or  Western  equine  encephalitis. 

A.    Source  Reduction.    Source  reduction  is  accomplished  by  the  removal  of  free, 
shallow,  standing  water  contributing  to  mosquito  production  or  by  the  elimination  of 
harborage  present  within  that  water.    Source  reduction  or  permanent  control  may 
involve  diking,  ditching,  draining,  dredging,  deepening,  filling  or  water  level 
management . 


B.  Pre-larviciding.    Pre-larviciding  consists  of  applying  approved  insecticides 
to  areas  known  to  produce  mosquitoes  but  which  contain  no  larvae  at  the  time  of 
application.    Granules  of  either  the  coated  or  clay  type  and  containing  either  1  or 
2  percent  concentrate  (e.g.  Abate,  chlorpyrifos  or  fenthion)  may  be  applied  to  the 
ice  of  snow  melt  pools  or  to  low  spots  that  collect  the  annual  run-off  and  which 
are  known  to  produce  an  early  hatch  of  mosquitoes.     Precisely  outlining  this  area 
depends  upon  experience,  accurate  surveys  and  records.    Areas  to  be  treated  by 
pre-larviciding  should  be  carefully  selected  to  insure  that  the  insecticide  will 

not  be  flushed  from  the  area  and  contaminate  potable  water  supplies  or  water  contain- 
ing valuable  resources. 

C.  Larviciding.     It  is  at  the  larval  stage  of  development  that  mosquitoes  are 
most  effectively  controlled.    More  mosquitoes  are  killed  per  given  quantity  of 
insecticide  by  larviciding  than  adulticiding  because  mosquito  larvae  are  concentrated 
in  a  restricted  location  and  less  toxicant  is  needed  to  affect  control,  (i.e.  since 
insecticide  is  applied  over  given  areas  at  approximately  the  same  dosage  whether 
adulticiding  or  larviciding,  more  insecticide  is  required  after  adults  disperse). 
Larviciding  should  not  be  conducted  without  surveying  a  site  and  establishing  that 
mosquito  larvae  are  present  in  sufficient  numbers  to  merit  control.    Larviciding  is 
conducted  by  the  application  of  fuel  oil,  fuel  oil  plus  spreader,  highly  refined  oils, 
insecticide  granules,  emulsifiable  concentrates  or  solutions  to  a  body  of  water.  The 
choice  of  approach  and  chemical  depends  upon  the  registration  of  the  chemical,  its 
use  directions  and  the  environmental  conditions  present. 

Besides  being  of  value  in  pre-larviciding,  granules  are  an  excellent  means  for 
applying  insecticide  through  heavy  foilage.    They  will  tumble  through  the  vegetation 
to  the  water  surface  rather  than  deposit  upon  the  surface  of  vegetation  as  liquid 
formulations  do.     (The  use  of  liquid  formulations  in  heavy  cover  may  result  in 
ineffective  control  from  the  application  of  less  than  toxic  amounts  of  insecticide 
to  both  the  water  and  the  foliage.) 

The  use  of  fuel  oil  should  be  restricted  to  waste  land  areas  not  possessing 
valuable  vegetation.     Fuel  oil  applied  at  the  rate  of  15  to  20  gallons  per  acre  may 
burn  vegetation  and  leave  an  unsightly  appearance.     Fuel  oil  with  a  spreading  agent 
applied  at  2  to  3  gallons  per  acre  is  slightly  less  objectionable.    The  more  highly 
refined  mosquito  control  oils  have  not  been  reported  to  have  this  toxic  effect. 

When  applying  an  insecticide  for  mosquito  control,  the  applicator  must  insure 
that  the  insecticide  is  also  registered  for  application  to  crops  in  that  area.  For 
example:    a  flooded  alfalfa  field  containing  mosquito  larvae  should  be  treated  with 
a  chemical  registered  for  both  mosquito  control  and  for  use  on  alfalfa  pests. 

D.  Adulticiding.    Adulticiding  is  conducted  through  the  use  of  thermal  fogging, 
misting  or  ULV  equipment.    Adulticiding  is  the  most  difficult  form  of  mosquito  control 
to  practice  in  terms  of  applying  the  correct  dosage  and  obtaining  the  proper  cover- 
age that  is  necessary  for  efficient  control.     Disadvantages  are  that  there  is  less 
control  over  exposure  of  non-target  organisms,  more  insecticide  is  used  per  mosquito 
killed,  the  effect  is  more  temporary  than  it  is  with  other  forms  of  mosquito  control 
and  a  repellent  effect  may  occur.     Routine  adulticiding  or  adulticiding  only  on  the 
basis  of  telephone  complaints  can  be  a  useless  and  expensive  procedure.  Nonetheless, 
adulticiding  can  *be  a  valuable  supplement  to  other  forms  of  mosquito  control.  It 

is  widely  used  to  combat  outbreaks  of  mosquito-borne  disease. 


-5- 


Mists,  fogs,  and  ULV  applications  depend  upon  direct  contact  of  the  insecticide 
with  the  adult  mosquitOo    For  this  reason,  they  are  most  effective  while  the  mosquito 
is  on  the  wing  in  the  early  morning  or  early  evening  hours.    Under  ideal  conditions, 
the  wind  does  not  exceed  five  miles  per  hour,  there  is  a  temperature  of  55  to  75°  F, 
and  the  relative  humidity  is  50  to  80  percent.    ULV  application  of  malathion  should 
not  be  made  if  the  temperature  exceeds  82°  F.    Space  spraying  is  conducted  as  near 
as  possible  at  right  angles  to  the  wind.    Low  wind  currents  are  depended  upon  to 
disperse  the  insecticide  over  the  300  to  4^00  foot  swath  width  which  may  result  under 
favorable  conditions  with  thermal  fog  or  ultra  low  volume  applications. 

The  movement  of  the  extremely  small  thermal  fog  particles  is  very  unpredictable. 
These  particles  are  more  subject  to  climatic  conditions  than  are  the  larger  ULV  or 
mist  particles. 

ULV  adulticiding  (the  application  of  H  gal.  or  less  of  undiluted  concentrate  .per 
acre)  results  in  the  distribution  of  more  uniform  particle  sizes  which  are  of  a  size 
sufficient  to  kill  the  adult  mosquito.     It  is  the  cheapest  form  of  adult  mosquito 
control  (about  \  that  of  thermal  fogging)  and  results  in  less  environmental  contamina- 
tion (the  use  of  diesel  fuel  is  eliminated  and  it  is  only  necessary  to  apply  approximately 
1/2  to  2/3  the  dosage  needed  for  thermal  fogging).    However,  since  pure  or  concentrated 
insecticide  is  dispensed,  chemical  and  equipment  use  directions  must  be  followed 
rigorously  and  the  performance  of  the  machine  must  be  continually  assessed  to  assure 
that  accidents  do  not  occur.    The  hazard  of  spotting  of  automobile  paint  increases  with 
droplet  size. 

Misting  machines  disseminate  a  wide  array  of  different  sized  particles.    This  may 
result  in  wastage  of  some  chemical  but  enables  applicators  to  use  the  machine  during 
daylight  hours  and  under  more  adverse  wind  and  temperature  conditions.    Misters  can 
be  used  for  short  term  residual  mosquito  control  in  parks  and  in  bushes  and  trees  in 
rural  or  urban  residential  areas.    Under  these  conditions  the  mist  is  directed  at  a 
lower  angle  than  the  customary  angle  of  45°  above  the  horizontal  that  is  used  when 
space  spraying.    If  vegetation  is  tall,  the  mist  should  be  directed  at  the  upper  part 
of  it.    The  vehicle  speed  should  be  5  mph  or  less  when  treating  low  sparse  vegetation 
and  3  mph  or  less  when  vegetation  is  dense.    In  the  latter  case  or  under  hot,  dry 
conditions,  the  effective  swath  width  may  not  exceed  100  feet.    Under  more  ideal 
conditions,  it  may  be  200  feet.    Although  one  can  larvicide  with  misters,  it  is  usually 
best  to  larvicide  with  equipment  designed  for  that  purpose  rather  than  attempt  to 
employ  adulticiding  equipment  in  this  fashion.     If  equipped  with  a  granule  hopper, 
however,  mist  blowers  can  be  used  to  effectively  larvicide  with  granules  as  well  as 
mist  for  adults. 

E.    Biological  Control.    Most  forms  of  biological  control  remain  in  the  experi- 
mental stage,.,     The  use  of  the  mosquitofish  Gambusia  af finis  has  been  effective  in 
Montana  on  a  limited  basis.     Other  experimental  efforts  to  use  fish  for  mosquito 
control  should  be  attempted  whenever  possible.    The  Fish  and  Game  Department  should 
be  notified  prior  to  such  attempts.    Algae,  protozoa  (particularly  microsporidia) , 
nematodes,  fungi  (e.g.  Cbelomomyces) ,  irridescent  viruses  and  the  crystaloid  toxicant 
produced  by  the  bacteria  Bacillus  thuringiensis    are  examples  of  experimental  control 
efforts  not  yet  reaching  field  use. 

VI .     Chemicals  for  Mosquito  Control 

A  variety  of  insecticides  are  registered  for  mosquito  control.    Since  registra- 
tions are  periodically  reviewed  and  certain  restrictions  may  be  imposed,  applicators 
should  consult  with  the  State  Department  of  Agriculture  and  State  Department  of  Health 
and  Environmental  Sciences  prior  to  using  them.     Label  directions  should  be  followed. 
The  following  table  indicates  pesticides  currently  used  in  mosquito  control. 


-6- 


Pesticides  Currently  Employed  in  Mosquito  Control' 


a,d 


Type 
Application 


Toxicant 


Dosage 


Remarks 


Residual 
Spray 


malathion 


100  -  200  mg 
per  square  ft. 


For  use  as  an  interior  house  treatment . 
Effective  for  3-5  months  on  wood  surfaces, 


Continuous 

Vapor 

Treatment 


dichlorvos 


1  dispenser  per 
1,000  cu.  ft. 


In  resin;  dispensers  hung  from  ceilings.  Gives 
2h  -        months  control.     Do  not  use  where 
infants,  ill  or  aged  are  confined  or  in  food 
preparation  or  serving  areas.  


Outdoor, 

Ground 

Applied, 

Space 

Spray 


chlorpyrifos 
( Dursban ) 

fenthion'^ 
(Baytex 


malathion 

naled 

pyrethrins 
( synergized) 


lb /acre 
0.0125 

0.001-0.1 
0.075-0.2 
0.02-0.1 

0.002-0.0025 


Dosage  based  on  estimated  300  foot  swath  width. 
Mists  and  fogs  are  applied  from  dusk  to  dawn. 
Mists  are  usually  dispersed  at  7  to  25  gal/mi. 
and  at  a  speed  of  5  mph.    Fogs  are  applied  at 
a  rate  of  40  gal/hr  @  5  mph  (occasionally  at 
higher  rates  and  greater  speeds).  Finished 
sprays  have  0.5-8  oz/gal  actual  insecticide 
in  oil  or  (with  non  thermal  foggers)  water. 
In  ULV  ground  applications'^  technical  grade 
malathion  is  used  at  1-1.5  fl.  oz/min  at 
5  mph  or  2-3  fl.  oz/min  @  10  mph;  some  ULV 
pyrethrins  at  2-2.25  fl.  oz/min  @  5  mph  or 
4-4.5  fl.  oz/min  @  10  mph;  chlorpyrifos 
fog  concentrate  at  2/3  -  1  1/3  fl.  oz/min  @ 
10  mph.  


Larvicide 


abate 

chlorpyrifos^ '® 
fenthion^'®>^ 
malathion 
pyrethrin  tossit 
fuel  oil 
Flit  MLO 


0.05-0.1 
0.0125-0,05 
0.05-0.1 
0.2-0.5 
1/100  sq.  ft. 
2  to  2Q  gal/A 
1  to  5  gal/A... 


Apply  by  ground  or  air  at  up  to  10  quarts 
finished  spray /acre  depending  on  concentration 
used.     Use  oil  or  water  emulsion  formulations 
in  areas  with  minimum  vegetative  cover;  granu- 
lar formulations  where  vegetative  cover  is 
heavy.     Fenthion  provides  longer  residual  in 
contaminated  water  at  5  times  the  dosage  listed 
Chlorpyrifos  has  long  residual  toxicity  in  water 
with  a  high  organic  content  (e.g.  12  weeks 
in  septic  tanks)  while  abate  is  fairly  labile 
in  polluted  water..    Apply  fuel  oil  at  15-20 
gal/A  in  open  water  courses  or  with  0.5% 
spreading  agent  (e.g.  T-Det-MC,  Dal-Com  W) 
apply  at  2-3  gal/A.  .  ,      . .  ;     ,       .   . 


a    Modified  from  "Public  Health  Pesticides"  Technical  Development  Laboratories,  Center  fpr,.,j 
Disease  Control,  U.S.  Department  Health,  Education  and  Welfare  (1973) 

b    Other  compounds  such  as  Lethane  384  and  ronnel  may  have  uses  in.-. §s^i^ca^eg(:^pi§-ff^i^iy.f§^^.follov 
label  directions.  a/o  bstB  woit  vr'ivs'i's 


c  For  use  by  trained  mosquito  control  personnel  only.  ,  , 
d  Adhere  STRICTLY  to  ALL  label  specifications  and  directions, 
e    Do  not  apply  to  waters  with  valuable  fish. 

f    Label  requires  a  3  week  interval  between  applications  except  for  adulticiding. 

-7- 


VII.    Equipment  for  Ground  Application 


A.  Introduction 

-Information  on  the  types  of  equipment  available  for  larviciding  and  adulticiding 
is  available  in  the  American  Mosquito  Control  Association  Bulletin  #2,  Ground  Equipment 
and  Insecticides  for  Mosquito  Control,  101  pp.    Only  brief  description  of  the  more 
conronly  used  types  of  equipment  will  be  included  herein.    Bulletins  such  as  A  Guide 
for  the  Safe  Use  of  Pesticides  and  Respiratory  Protection  Against  Pesticides  are  avail- 
able  from  the  Environmental  Services  Bureau  of  the  State  Department  of  Health  and 
Environmental  Sciences;  "  .  ..   -•  " 

-.-cticiBy    Types  of  Larviciding  Equipment 

In  nearly  all  public  health  insect  control  projects,  the  compressed  air  sprayer, 
is  standard  equipment.    These  sprayers  are  small  1  to  4  (usually  2  or  3)  gallon  cylindrical 
tanks  equipped  with  an  air  pump,  hose  and  spray  gun  (wand  and  nozzle).    After  filling  the 
tank  about  3/H  full,  air  is  compressed  into  the  remaining  space  for  use  in  forcing  the 
liquid  through  the  nozzle.    Desirable  features  include  stainless  steel  construction,  a 
pressure  gauge,  a  large  filler  opening,  synthetic  rubber  gaskets  and  a  pressure  release 
valve.    (If  no  pressure  release  valve  is  present,  turn  the  sprayer  over  and  release 
pressure  through  the  nozzle  before  opening).    A  flat  fan  nozzle  is  usually  used  for 
applying  residual  sprays  to  walls,  while  a  hollow  cone  nozzle  is  ordinarily  used  for 
applying  insecticide  to  vegetation  and  mosquito  breeding  sites.    A  stock  of  spare  parts 
should  be  kept  on  hand. 

The  hydraulic  power  sprayers,  with  capacities  of  from  50  to  300  gallons  (usually 
50  -  150  gallons)  can  pump  a  maximum  of  from  1  to  10  gallons  of  spray  per  minute.  Most 
which  are  used  for  mosquito  control  are  mounted  on  skids  or  on  the  beds  of  3/U  ton 
trucks.    This  sprayer  consists  of  a  tank  (usually  with  an  agitator),  a  pump,  a  power 
source  (usually  a  gasoline  engine),  a  pressure  regulator  and  relief  valve  and  one  or 
more  hoses  and  hand  guns  (and/or  occasionally  a  boom).    Hoses  are  usually  50  to  200 
feet  long.    For  longer  lengths  of  hose  it  is  advisable  to  use  one  with  a  H  inch  I.D. 
since  there  is  less  frictional  loss  of  pressxire  than  with  \i  inch  or  3/8  inch  hose. 

Two  types  of  hand  operated  granule  applicators  are  commonly  used  in  larviciding. 
One  is  the  rotary  slinger  plate  type  of  grass  seeder.    When  used  in  tall  grass  and 
cattails,  the  moving  parts  can  get  clogged  unless  a  protective  sheet  of  metal  is  mounted 
below  and  ahead  of  them  to  divert  vegetation.    The  most  common  type  of  hand  operated 
granulator  in  Montana  is  the  "sling"  seeder  (horn  seeder).    This  is  a  tear-drop  shaped 
granule  bag  with  a  tapered  metal  tube.    An  applicator  feeds  granules  into  the  3  foot 
long  tube  and  dispenses  them  through  the  adjustable  gate  by  whipping  the  tube  back  and 
forth. 

Power  granulators  are  of  several  types.    One  kind  commonly  used  is  a  power  driven 
rotary  plate  type  of  seeder.    Granules  are  fed  from  a  hopper  to  a  rotating  plate  by 
gravity  flow  and  slung  out  in  a  fairly  uniform  swath  by  centrifugal  force.    The  other 
type  of  power  granulator  commonly  used  is  a  modified  mist  blower.    Granules  are  dis- 
charged into  the  air  exhaust  duct  and  moving  air  transports  the  granules  to  the 
target.    Back-pack  dusters  can  be  modified  in  a  similar  manner. 


-8- 


C.    Types  of  Adult iciding  Equipment 

Equipment  most  commonly  used  for  adult  mosquito  control  is  of  three  types: 
Ultra  low  volume  (ULV,  misting  and  thermal  fogging.     (See  Section  V  D,  Adulticiding, 
for  a  discussion  of  principles  governing  adulticiding  with  each  type  of  equipment 
and  factors  influencing  their  effectiveness  and  versatility. 

Thermal  fog  generators  break  insecticide  into  aerosol  sized  particles  by  means 
of  blasts  of  hot  exhaust  gases.    The  following  recommendations  upon  equipment  for 
fogging  were  developed  by  the  Entomological  Research  Center  of  the  Florida  State 
Board  of  Health.    Mention  of  any  brand  does  not  constitute  endorsement  by  the 
Montana  Department  of  Health  and  Environmental  Sciences. 

Equipment  for  Fogging: 

Dyna  Fog  Sr. 

1.  Machine  operation  -  Operated  as  recommended  by  the  manufacturer 
with  respect  to  engine  speed  and  formulation  pressure,  i.e.,  6-12  p.s.i. 

2,  Wind  and  Temperature'''  -  Operate  when  air  temperatures  are  65 
or  above  and  in  winds  up  to,  but  not  greater  than  3  mph. 

Leco  80  &  120  ^  « 

1.  Machine  Operation  -  Burner  temperature:     850    -  900    F;  engine 
r.p.m. :    2000;  formulation  pressure;  whatever  is  required  to  produce  40  gallons 

per  hour.    When  applying  80  gph  (model  120)  the  burner  temperature  should  be  1000°  F. 

2.  Wind  and  Temperature  -  This  machine  can  be  effgctive  when  air 
temperatures  are  60*^  -         but  best  results  were  obtained  at  65    and  above.  Present 
data  indicate  effective  results  in  winds  up  to  9  mph. 

Leco  W 

1.  Machine  Operation  -  Burner  temperature:  1200°F;  engine  r.p.m.: 
3400;  formulation  pressure:  whatever  is  required  to  produce  40  gallons  per  hour 
(usually  6  to  8  p.s.i.) 

2.  Wind  and  Temperature  -  Best  results  were  obtained  when  atmos- 
pheric temperatures  were  above  SU*^  F  and  with  winds  up  to  8  mph. 

See  Fog  (Tifa  SF-50) 

1.  Machine  Operation  -  As  recommended  by  manufacturer:  Gas 
pressure:     38  p.s.i.;  steam  pressure:     25  p.s.i.;  water  pressure  45  p.s.i. 

2.  Wind  and  Temperature  -  Operate  when  air  temperatures  are  70°  and 
above;  present  data  indicate  that  this  machine  is  effective  in  winds  up  to  5  mph. 

Tifa  40-E 

1.  Machine  Operation  -  Burner  temperature;  1000°;  formulations 
pressure:    25  p.s.i.;  engine  r.p.m.  2200. 

2.  Wind  and  Temperature  -  This  machine  is  effective  at  air  temperatures 
of  60°  -  64°  but  best  results  are  at  650  and  above.    Data  indicate  that  the  TIFA 

can  be  used  effectively  in  winds  at  least  to  9  mph,  but  better  average  kills  were 
obtained  at  the  lower  wind  velocities,  as  with  all  other  machines  tested. 

NOTE :  Recommendations  with  respect  to  wind  and  temperature  conditions  are 
based  only  upon  test  results  using  malathion  or  malathion-Lethane .  Similar  data 
for  other  insecticides  are  not  presently  available  for  most  of  the  machines  listed. 


-9- 


Mist  blowers  are  essentially  large  capacity  power  driven  air  turbines  which 
drive  air  at  high  velocity  through  a  tube.    Several  models  discharge  5000  cubic  feet 
of  air  per  minute  at  150  mph.    Sprays  are  pumped  at  low  pressure  and  volume  into  a 
discharge  tube  where  it  is  atomized  by  a  nozzle.     In  addition  to  granule  hopper 
attachment  modifications  already  discussed,  "mini-spin"  nozzles  have  been  inserted 
into  insecticide  lines  to  disperse  insecticide  concentrates. 

Ultra  low  volume  equipment  for  adulticiding  is  of  relatively  recent  origin. 
Special  nozzles  or  attachments  break  insecticide  concentrates  up  into  relatively 
uniform  particles  measured  in  terms  of  microns.    Advantages  have  already  been 
discussed  (Section  V,  D). 

D=    Equipment  Selection 

The  equipment  selected  must  fit  the  various  local  needs  in  an  area.  Careful 
survey  and  analysis  of  the  extent  and  types  of  breeding  areas  will  provide  the  basis 
for  equipment  selection,,    If  an  area  has  extensive  ditches,  ponds,  small  swamps  and 
temporary  pools  which  are  accessible  by  road,  power  driven  sprayers  and  granulators 
mounted  on  trucks  or  jeeps  are  suitable.     If  these  areas  are  inaccessible, 
compressed  air  sprayers  and  hand  held  granulators  are  used.    Large  swamps  and 
irrigated  areas  are  treated  with  power  equipment  mounted  on  trucks;  if  inaccessible 
they  are  treated  with  power  equipment  mounted  on  all-terrain  vehicles.    Where  there 
are  extensive  larval  populations  distributed  over  extensive  inaccessible  areas, 
contracted  spraying  by  air  craft  may  be  the  most  effective  means  of  control. 

Other  factors  that  are  important  considerations  are  budgetary  limitations, 
labor  costs  and  equipment  versatility    and  serviceability.    Equipment  that  can  be 
effectively  operated  by  one  man  will  pay  for  itself  in  one  or  two  seasons  if  compared 
to  the  labor  cost  of  crew  served  equipment.    A  similar  cost -benefit  analysis  can  be 
applied  to  more  expensive  equipment  that  can  be  operated  in  several  ways  by  a  crew 
of  two  but  which  has  the  capability  of  covering  the  same  area  that  3  or  ^  crews 
cover  with  more  inexpensive  equipment.    An  appropriate  example  may  be  cited  for 
regions  which  have  extensive  sloughs  (which  are  relatively  inaccessible)  and 
sluggish  overgrown  ditches.    If  an  all  terrain  vehicle  (ATV)  were  outfitted  with  a 
hydraulic  sprayer  and  power  granulator,  the  area  becomes  accessible  and  can  be  treated 
much  more  rapidly.    While  being  trailered,  one  could  also  use  it  to  treat  roadside 
borrow  area, 

VIII„     Chemical  Application 

A.    Equipment  Calibration 

Prior  to  any  attempt  to  control  mosquitoes  an  applicator  must  familiarize 
himself  with  the  equipment  and  calibrate  it .     To  "calibrate"  is  to  determine  the 
quantity  of  chemical  that  the  equipment  dispenses  each  second,  minute  or  hour.  The 
quantity  dispensed  will  vary  with  various  equipment  settings  (such  as  RPM  or  pressure) 
with  various  attachments  (different  disks  and  nozzles)  and,  in  some  cases,  with  the 
temperature  and  viscosity  of  the  chemical.    Equipment  manuals  which  accompany  the 
sprayers  or  granulators  normally  contain  sufficient  instruction  for  calibration 
and  operation  and  are,  hence,  only  briefly  discussed. 

In  calibrating  compressed  air  or  hydraulic  sprayers,  spray  into  a  container 
for  an  established  period  of  time  and  measure  the  amount  of  material  dispensed  in 
order  to  determine  the  discharge  rate/second  or  minute.     (See  also  Section  VIII  F(3), 
Varying  the  Discharge  Rate).    Since  the  spray  pattern  and  discharge  rate  vary  with 
the  pressure  being  used,  it  is  advisable  to  calibrate  and  use  the  compressed  air 
sprayer  over  a  30  to  50  psi  pressure  range.     In  this  way,  the  average  pressure  will 
be  suitable  for  producing  the  delivery  rate  and  spray  characteristics  for  which  many 
nozzles  are  designed. 

-10- 


In  calibrating  mist  blowers  or  thermal  foggers,  the  tank  is  filled  to  a  mark 

with  water  or  fuel  oil  respectively.    The  equipment  is  operated  for  a  period  of  time 

and  the  quantity  of  material  necessary  to  replace  that  dispensed  is  measured.  The 

discharge  rate  is  usually  measured  in  terms  of  gallons  per  hour.     (See  also  Section 
VIII  C  (2),  Computation  of  acreage  for  adulticiding) . 

Power  granulators  are  usually  calibrated  in  terms  of  pounds  of  granules 
dispensed  per  minute,  hour  of  mile  of  travel  at  a  set  speed.    The  rate  of  discharge 
selected  will  depend  on  the  swath  width    that  is  obtained  with  the  type  of  granule 
selected  and  the  recommended  dosage  rate  of  the  chemical  selected.     (Smaller  heavier 
granules  will  give  a  wider  swath  width  and  the  discharge  rate  needed  will  be  greater). 
Steps  to  be  followed  are  (1)  measure  the  swath  width;  (2)  calculate  the  acreage 
covered  per  mile  of  travel  (swath  width  (in  feet)  X  5280  t  4-3,550);  (3)  multiply  by 
lbs  of  granules  desired  per  acre  (to  get  lbs/mile  of  travel);  (4)  multiply  by  the 
desired  rate  of  vehicle  speed  (to  get  lbs  per  hour)  and  (5)  by  trial  and  error 
adjust  the  flow  rate  of  granules  to  meet  the  desired  pounds/hour.     (See  Section 
VIII  E(3),  Dosage  rates  for  granules  and  dusts  for  an  example.) 

In  the  hand  operated  "sling"  or  horn  seeders,  an  adjustable  gate  regulates 
the  gravity  flow  of  granules.    The  amount  that  the  gate  will  be  opened  will  depend 
on  swath  width  and  rate  of  travel.    These  variables  will  be  balanced  against  each 
other  as  indicated  in  Section  VIII  B,  Standardizing  Application  Rates. 

Operation  manuals  which  accompany  ultra  low  volume  (ULV)  equipment  should  be 
consulted  for  calibration.     Flow  rates  are  again  determined  by  swath  width  and  the 
recommended  dosage  rates.     Flow  rates  vary  with  the  temperature  and  viscosity  of 
the  insecticide  and  calibrations  should  extend  over  the  temperature  range.  The 
calibration  of  ULV  equipment  also  includes  rigorous  regulation  of  droplet  size 
and  coverage. 

B.     Standardizing  Application  Rates 

Applying  the  correct  volume  of  finished  spray  or  weight  of  granules  is 
largely  a  matter  of  practice.    Two  approaches  are  used.     One  approach  is  based 
strictly  on  the  time  required  to  apply  the  correct  quantity  to  a  given  area.  One 
can  develop  a  table  that  will  show  the  number  of  seconds  required  to  dispense  required 
volumes  or  weights  over  a  series  of  areas.    The  other  approach  is  based  on  the  develop- 
ment of  a  particular  constant  rate  of  movement  by  the  applicator,  nozzle  or  equipment. 
The  rate  of  movement  or  the  time  that  chemical  is  actually  being  dispensed  is  depen- 
dent upon  the  discharge  rate  of  the  equipment  (in  turn  determined  by  nozzle  type, 
pressure,  etc.) 

In  developing  the  appropriate  rate  of  movement,  measure  and  stake  out  a  test 
area  and  use  one  of  the  following  approaches  (1)  fill  the  equipment  to  a  certain 
mark,  (2)  spray  the  test  area  uniformly,  (3)  measure  the  amount  of  material  required 
to  fill  the  equipment  to  the  original  level,  (U)  compare  with  the  amount  of  material 
which  should  have  been  used  and  (5)  adjust  the    rate  of  application  accordingly. 
Or,  (1)  place  only  the  volume  or  weight  of  material  required  for  treatment  in  the 
equipment,  (2)  spray  or  granulate  the  test  area  and  (3)  try  to  adjust  the  rate  of 
travel/application  so  that  the  chemical  runs  out  just  as  the  area  has  been  completely 
and  uniformly  covered  (i.e.  just  as  the  applicator  reaches  the  stake  at  the  other  end 
of  a  linear  area  or  returns  to  the  starting  stake  in  a  more  circular  or  rectangular 
area) . 


C.    Computation  of  Acreage 

Since  insecticide  labels  usually  express  the  limits  for  dosage  rates  as  pounds 
or  fluid  ounces  of  active  ingredient  per  acre,  it  is  necessary  to  calculate  the 
acreage  of  each  site  to  be  treated.    Methods  used  to  compute  acreage  are  given  below. 

1.    Computation  of  acreage  for  larviciding 

In  smaller  areas,  the  acreage  may  be  estimated  by  pacing  off  the  length 
and  width  of  the  area  to  be  treated.    If  the  area  is  relatively  square  or  rectangular, 
a  multiplication  of  length  x  width  will  give  the  area  in  square  yards.  (Although 
the  average  "normal"  step  is  about  30  inches,  one  can  develop  a  step  of  about  36 
inches  with  little  practice).    If  the  area  is  more  triangular  in  shape  than 
rectangular,  the  length  x  width  value  should  be  divided  by  2.    It  is  then  necessary 
to  convert  square  yard  measurements  to  acres.    This  may  be  done  by  dividing  the 
number  of  square  yards  by  4840  (1  acre  =  4840  square  yards  =  43,550  square  feet). 
It  is  more  convenient,  less  time  consuming  and  there  is  less  chance  for  mathematical 
error  if  a  table  such  as  below  is  consulted. 


Square  yards 

Acres 

t^ULlO^  C      VOX  Uk9 

Acres 

650 

.1343 

50 

.0103 

700 

.1446 

100 

.0206 

750 

.1570 

150 

.0309 

800 

.1553 

200 

.0413 

850 

.1756 

250 

.0537 

900 

.1858 

300 

.0619 

950 

.1952 

350 

.0723 

1000 

.2055 

400 

.0826 

2000 

.4132 

450 

.0929 

3000 

.6198' 

500 

.1033 

4000 

.8264 

550 

.1157 

5000 

1.0330 

600 

.1239 

Additional  columns  can  be  added  to  the  table  to  further  reduce  the  chances 
for  error  and  save  time.     One  can  e.g.  calculate  the  gallons  or  pounds  of  actual 
and  mixed  chemical  required  for  each  area  involved  and/or  the  number  of  seconds 
the  trigger  valve  would  have  to  be  open  to  deliver  the  required  amount  of  chemical. 


-12- 


It  is  suggested  that  conversion  tables  be  maintained  in  the  spray  vehicles. 
It  is  further  suggested  that  the  acreage  at  each  mosquito  source  be  recorded.  Although 
the  acreage  at  each  site  may  vary  from  season  to  season  and  time  to  time,  some  ponds 
have  rather  stable  boundaries    and  some  areas  are  flooded  to  about  the  same  extent 
with  each  irrigation. 

For  larger  areas  or  for  long  ditches  or  borrow  pits,  the  acreage  may  be 
more  rapidly  estimated  by  the  simple  field  calculation  noted  in  formula  1  below. 
This  is  based  upon  a  figure  of  8  feet  swath  width  for  one  mile  of  travel. 

<   -1  mile  (5,280  ft.)  > 


Approximately  1  acre  (i+2,2'+0  sq.  ft.) 


One  square  mile  =  640  acres. 

Formula  1       Acreage  Treated  =  mileage  covered  x  swath  width 
— g 

Example  1.  Calculate  the  acreage  treated  by  larviciding  an  area  \  mile  long  and 
12  feet  wide. 


Acreage  Treated  =         ^       =  .75  acres 

8 

2.    Computation  of  acreage  for  adult iciding 

In  space  treatments  (misting  and  fogging)  the  acreage  treated  is  a  variable 
figure  dependent  upon  the  swath  width  taken.     The  first  step  then  is  to  determine 
the  swath  width.    This  may  be  done  by  setting  out  cages  of  mosquitoes  and  adulticiding; 
using  visual  observations  of  a  fog;  or  setting  out  strips  of  paper  and  spraying  a  dye 
solution  (minus  insecticide).    While  this  may  be  practical  in  calibrating  a  machine, 
an  operator  would  not  find  it  practical  to  conduct  such  tests  routinely.    As  a  practical 
consideration,  the  swath  widths  in  urban  areas  are  usually  taken  as  the  length  or 
width  of  the  city  block.    The  approximate  acreage  treated  by  space  application  of 
insecticides  may  be  determined  by  Formula  1  above  as  e.g. 

Example  2.     Calculate  the  acreage  treated  by  a  mister  traveling  4  miles  where  the 
swath  width  is  200  feet. 


Acreage    Treated  ■-  ^  ^         -  100  acres 

8 

D .     Formulat  ions 

Insecticides  for  mosquito  control  are  sold  in  Montana  in  a  number  of  formulations 
(forms):    emulsifiable  concentrates,  non-emulsif iable  concentrates,  granules,  tossits, 
(encapsulated  insecticides)  or  as  finished  sprays  (ready  to  use),    Emulsifiable  con- 
centrates are  normally  mixed  with  water  (or  occasionally  with  fuel  oil)  prior  to  use 
while  the  non-emulsif iable  concentrates  are  normally  diluted  with  fuel  oil  to  make  a 
finished  spray.    Granules,  tossits  and  finished  sprays  (such  as  95%  ULV  malathion) 
are  ready  to  use  as  received. 

-13- 


8  ft. 


Pesticide  container  labels  give  directions  for  dilution  prior  to  use.    The  level 
of  dilution  which  you  use  should  fall  within  the  limits  specified  on  the  label.  However 
other  factors  need  consideration:     (1)  The  more  concentrated  the  finished  spray  is,  the 
more  closely  the  application  rate  must  be  controlled,  i.e.  slightly  over  or  under 
spraying  of  a  more  dilute  solution  has  less  effect  on  the  amount  of  active  ingredient 
applied  than  slightly  over  or  under  spraying  a  more  concentrated  solution.    (2)  The 
more  carrier  (oil  or  water)  used,  the  less  finished  spray  that  can  be  held  in  the 
spray  tank.    (3)  The  more  carrier  used,  the  higher  the  carrier  cost. 

The  actual  dilution  used  will  be  based  upon  the  equipment  characteristics  (dis- 
charge rate)  and  rate  of  application.    If  the  equipment  puts  out  a  large  volume  in  a 
short  period  of  time,  the  finished  spray  may  be  more  dilute  or  the  rate  of  application 
very  fast. 

E.  Determining  Amount  of  Mixed  Chemical  Needed. 

After  determining  the  size  of  the  area  needing  treatment  (in  acres),  one  can 
determine  the  amount  of  finished  spray  needed.    This  will  depend  on:    (1)  the  allowable 
dosage  rate  (pounds  or  fluid  ounces  of  active  ingredient  per  acre)  specified  on  the 
insecticide  label  and  (2)  the  degree  to  which  the  insecticide  concentrate  has  been 
diluted.    The  following  formula  may  be  used  to  determine  the  quantity  of  insecticide 
needed. 

Formula  2.       Gallons  finished  _   Dosage  rate  x  acreage  treated  

'       spray  needed  Insecticide  (lbs.  or  fl.  oz.)/gal.  finished  spray 

Example  3.    A  dosage  rate  of  0.06  lbs.  of  fenthion/acre  is  desired  on  U  acres  of 
standing  water  in  a  field.    The  finished  spray  contains  0.08  lbs.  of  active  ingredient 
per  gallon.    (To  obtain  this,  one  could  mix  e.g.  2  gallons  of  Baytex  4  EC  lb/gal) 
with  98  gallons  of  water).    How  much  finished  spray  should  be  used?    By  Formula  2: 

Gallons  needed  =  ^  ^    =  3  gallons 

0.08 

Formulas  3  and  4  below  may  be  revised  to  determine  the  gallons  of  liquid 
insecticide  needed  (given  percent  concentration  or  specific  gravity)  or  pounds  of 
insecticide  granules  needed  respectively. 

F.  Computation  of  Dosage  Rates. 

After  determining  the  acreage  treated  and  amount  of  insecticide  used,  one  can 
establish  that  the  correct  dosage  rate    was  used.    Remember,  the  rates  applied  must 
fall  within  the  limits  specified  on  the  insecticide  label. 

1.     Dosage  rates  for  liquid  formulations  given  pounds  active  ingredient/ 
gallon  in  the  finished  spray  may  be  calculated  by  the  following  revision  of  Formula  2: 

Dosage  Rate  =  Gallon  applied  x  insecticide /gallon  (lbs) 

Acreage  treated 


■14- 


Example  4.    An  area  2  miles  long  and  200  feet  in  depth  was  treated  with  40  gallons  of 
fenthion  emulsion  containing  0.08  lbs  of  active  ingredient /gallon.    Calculate  the 
dosage  rate. 

Using  Formula  1:    Acreage  treated  =  ^  =  acres 

8 

Using  Formula  2:    Dosage  rate  =       ^  "-"^  =  0.064  lbs. /acre 

S  0 

2.  Dosage  rates  for  liquid  formulations  (given    various  percentages). 

The  strengths  of  liquid  concentrates  are  often  given  as  percentage  of  active 
ingredient  rather  than  in  pounds /gallon.    Occasionally  the  specific  gravity  of  the 
concentrate  is  given.    The  following  formula  may  be  used. 

Formula  3. 

a.  Dosage  rate  =  gallons  applied  x  wt./gal  of  formulation  x  %  cone. 

acreage  treated 

or  (where  given  specific  gravity) 

b.  Dosage  rate  =  gallons  applied  x  sp.  gr.  x  8.345  x  %  cone. 

acreage  treated 

3.  Dosage  rates  for  granules  and  dusts  may  be  calculated  by: 

Formula  4.    Dosage  rate  =  Pounds  applied  x  %  of  concentration 
  acreage  treated 

Example  5.     A  2%  fenthion  granular  formulation  is  used  for  larviciding  a  swampy  waste- 
land area  which  is  1  mile  long.    The  swath  width  is  16  feet.    The  rate  of  application  i: 
20  lbs/mile  of  travel  (100  lbs/hour  at  5  mph).    Calculate  the  dosage  rate. 

Using  Formula  1:    Acreage  treated  =      ^         =  2  acres 

8 

Using  Formula  4:    Dosage  Rate  =  20  x^0.02    =  .2  lbs/acre 


G.     Methods  of  varying  the  Dosage  Rate 

There  are  generally  three  methods  used  to  vary  the  dosage  rate:    (1)  varying 
the  formulation  strength;  (2)  varying  speed  of  travel;  and  (3)  varying  the  discharge 
rate.    Most  often  in  space  treatment,  the  simplest  and  most  practical  method  is  to  use 
a  more  or  a  less  concentrated  formulation.     In  this  way,  it  is  possible  to  maintain 
the  optimum  speed  of  travel  (5  mph)  and  the  standard  discharge  rate  giving  the  best 
droplet  size  and  coverage.     In  larviciding,  it  may  be  practical  to  vary  the  formula- 
tion strength  for  different  larger  jobs  where  the  terrain  may  dictate  different 
average  speeds.    There  may  be  several  reasons  for  wishing  to  vary  the  speed  of  travel. 
Heavy  vegetation  at  a  particular  larval  station  may  require  higher  dosage  rate;  the 
physical  situation  may  require  that  a  different  swath  width  be  taken,  etc.     In  some 
situations,  it  may  be  more  practical  to  vary  the  discharge  rate.    The  terrain  may  be 
such  that  the  speed  of  travel  has  to  be  temporarily  reduced  or  such  that  the  speed 
of  travel  could  be  more  rapid  than  normal. 


-15- 


1,    Adjusting  formulation  strength 

If  one  wished  to  maintain  a  standard  discharge  rate  (e.g.  100  gal/hr)  and 
standard  speed  (e.g.  5  mph)  over  the  same  swath  width,  one  could  vary  the  dosage  rate 
bv  varvtnj  the  diiuUon  of  insecticide  concentrate.     One  can  determine  the  formula- 
Son  sSengS  needed  to  obtain  a  given  dosage  rate  by  the  following  rearrangement  of 
formula  2: 

Insecticide  (lbs)    _  (Dosage  rate)  (acres  treated) 
gal.  finished  spray  ~  gallons  applied 


Example  6.     You  wish  to  reduce  the  dosage  rate  in  example  4  from  0.064  lbs/acre  to 
0.05  lbs/acre  and  still  maintain  a  discharge  rate  of  20  gal/mile  where    due  to  a 
200  foot  swath  width,  25  acres  were  covered  each  mile.    Compute  the  gallons  of  4  lb /gal 
concentrate  needed  t;  make  100  gallons  of  finished  spray.    Usxng  the  above  formula: 


Insecticide  (lbs)    ^  0.05  x  25  ^  o.0625  lb/gal  =  6.25  lb/100  gal. 
gal.  finished  spray  20 

Thus  one  would  have  to  use  1.55  gallons  of  concentrate  containing  4  lbs  of  active  in- 
^liZl  ITr  lallon  to  get  the  6^25  lbs  per  100  gallons  desired  in  the  finxshed  formula- 
tion.    (This  would  amount  to  using  25  pints  of  concentrate  and  diluting  it  to  100 
gallons-determined  as:     1.56  gal  x  16  pints/gal  =  24.96  pints).    NOTE:    For  a 
different  dilution  swath  width,  discharge  rate,  vehicle  speed  or  dosage  rate,  a 
different  dilution  would  be  appropriate. 

2.    Varying  the  speed  of  travel 

Doubling  the  rate  of  travel  doubles  the  acreage  treated  and  halves  the  dosage 
rate  if  other  variables  are  maintained.     Conversely  any  decrease  in  speed  would  result 
in  a  proportionate  increase  in  the  dosage  rate.     From  the  formulation  strength,  dis- 
charge rate  and  desired  dosage  rate,  one  can  compute  the  needed  vehicle  speed  for  any 
given  swath  width.    By  rearranging  formula  2,  one  can  obtain  the  gallons  of  finished 
spray  needed  per  acre.    By  dividing  the  discharge  rate  (gal/hr)  by  gallons  per  acre 
applied,  one  obtains  the  number  of  acres  which  need  to  be  covered  per  hour.    One  can 
then  consult  the  coverage  rate  table  below  to  determine  the  appropriate  rate  of  speed 
(modified  from  the  Depts.  of  Air  Force,  Army  and  Navy  Insect  and  Rodent  Control  Manual 
and  the  Cascade  County  Mosquito  Abatement  District  manual). 

Example  7.    A  mister  delivers  100  gal/hr  of  a  formulation  containing  0.0625  lb/gal. 
The  operator  desires  a  dosage  rate  of  0.05  lbs/acre  over  a  200  ft    swath  width. 
Calculate  the  appropriate  vehicle  speed.    By  substituting  in  a  modification  of 
Formula  2,  one  obtains: 

gallons  _      dosage  rate      _    0-05    _  Q^g  gal/acres  as  the  needed  application  rate  for 
acre      ~  insecticide /gal  0.0525 

the  finished  spray. 

The  acreage  treated/hr  at  a  discharge  rate  of  100  gal/hr  =  Q^f^g^^^,  =  ^25  acres/hr. 

From  the  following  table,  one  can  observe  that,  where  the  swath  width  is  200  feet,  the 
appropriate  speed  is  about  5  mph. 


-16- 


Rate  of  Coverage  for  G 


iven  Rates  of  Travel  and  Given  Swath  Widths 


Rate  of 

Yards 

Acreage  covered/hr.  for  given  swath  widths 

Travel 
( mph ) 

Traveled 
Per  Hour 

12.5  ft. 

15  ft. 

25  ft. 

50  ft. 

100  ft. 

200  ft. 

300  ft. 

0.5 

880 

0.75 

0.91 

1.5 

3 

6 

12 

18 

1.0 

1,760 

1.5 

1.8 

3.0 

6 

12 

24 

36 

1.5 

2,540 

2.25 

2.7 

4.5 

9 

18 

36 

54 

2.0 

3,520 

3.0 

3.  6 

5.0 

12 

24 

48 

72 

3.0 

5,280 

4,5 

5.4 

9.0 

18 

36 

72 

108 

1  i+.O 

7,040 

6.0 

7.2 

12.0 

24 

48 

96 

144 

0  •  u 

ft  flnn 

7.5 

9.05 

15.0 

30 

60 

121 

181 

5.0 

10,560 

9.0 

10.8 

18.0 

36 

72 

144 

216 

10.0 

17,600 

15.0 

18.1 

30.0 

60 

121 

242 

362 

In  the  absence  of  a  table  or  with  a  different  swath  width,  one  could  estimate 
the  appropriate  speed  of  travel  by  the  folxowing  modification  of  Formula  1: 


Speed  (mph) 


-  Acres  treated/hr.  x  8  ft. 


In  example  7 :     Speed  = 


swath  width  (ft. ) 
-  125  X  8 


200 


5  mph 


If  one  knows  the  dosage  rate  resulting  from  a  particular  speed  of  travel,  he 
can  apply  any  other  dosage  rate  over  the  same  area  by  changing  the  speed  of  travel.  Since 
speed  is  inversely  proportional  to  the  dosage  rate,  one  can  set  up  a  simple  ratio: 
Speedj^  X  Dosage  Rate-;^  =  Speed2  x  Dosage  Rate2 

Example  8.    A  57%  Malathion  EC  (5  lb/gal)  is  to  be  misted  over  an  irrigated  alfalfa  field 
adjacent  to  town  because  of  residual  larval  pools  and  extensive  cover  being  afforded  to 
adults.    The  formulation  strength  and  discharge  rate  were  such  that  a  dosage  rate  of  0.2 
lbs/acre  was  delivered  in  town  at  10  mph.    The  operator  wished  to  apply  0.5  lbs/acre 
over  the  field.    Compute  the  appropriate  speed. 

0.2  X  10  =  0.5  X  speedj 

speed2  =       ^  ^'^  =  4  mph 
•  5 


3.     Varying  the  discharge  rate 

This  method  of  varying  the  dosage  rate  is  most  often  used  while  larviciding. 
In  discharging  liquid  formulations,  the  dosage  rate  may  be  varied  by  changing  the  spray- 
ing pressure  or  nozzle  tips  or  disks.     Increasing  the  spraying  pressure  has  the  dis- 
advantage of  decreasing  the  droplet  size  and  consequently  increasing  the  potential  drift 


-17- 


of  the  insecticide.    A  change  in  pressure  does  not  result  in  a  proportionate  change 
the  discharge  rate.     (The  table  below  illustrates  this).    Larger  changes  in  the  dis- 
charge rate  are  more  effectively  brought  about  by  changing  the  nozzle  tips.  The 
following  table  (taken  from  the  Cascade  County  Mosquito  Abatement  District  Manual) 
illustrates  the  discharge  rate  that  various  nozzle  sizes  emit  at  various  pressures. 


Data  for  Trigger-Valve  Hand  Guns 

Rate  (gal/min) 
200  psi           300  psi 

1+00  psi 

500  psi 

D-4 

1.2 

1.5 

1.6 

1.9 

D-5 

1.8 

2.2 

2.6 

2.8 

D-6 

2.5 

3.0 

3.4 

3.8 

D-7 

3.3 

H.O 

4.4 

4.9 

D-8 

4.3 

5.2 

5.0 

6.6 

-18- 


Selected  References 

Mosquitoes  of  Public  Health  Importance  and  Their  Control  (Revised  1971),  PHS, 
U.S.   Dept.  HEW 

Insecticidal  Equipment  for  the  Control  of  Insects  of  Public  Health  Importance  (1959), 
CDC,  PHS,  U.S.  Dept.  HEW 

Insecticides  for  the  Control  of  Insects  of  Public  Health  Importance  (1962),  CDC, 
PHS,  U.S.  Dept.  HEW 

"Public  Health  Pesticides"  Pest  Control,  (April  1973),  Technical  Development 
Laboratories,  CDC,  PHS,  U.S.  Dept.  HEW 

Ground  Equipment  and  Insecticides  for  Mosquito  Control  (1968)  American  Mosquito 
Control  Association,  Bulletin  No.  2,  Revised 

Insect  and  Rodent  Control  (1956),  U.S.  Dept.  Army,  TM  5-632 


-19-