Skip to main content

Full text of "The naturalist"

See other formats


r 


October  - December  1993  Number  1007 

_ Volume  118 

Naturalist 


A QUARTERLY  JOURNAL  OF  NATURAL  HISTORY  FOR  THE  NORTH  OF  ENGLAND 


Freshwater  algae  in  Yorkshire  — Gordon  F.  Leedale 


Annual  and  long-term  observations  on  the  Cnidaria  inhabiting 
an  intertidal  mussel  bed  in  Morecambe  Bay,  Lancashire  — 

David  Jones 

A review  of  the  Grayling  ( Thymallus  thymallus  L.)  in  Yorkshire 
and  some  records  of  transfers  of  Fish  and  ova  — Leslie  Magee 

Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  between  1964  and  1984, 
and  possible  environmental  causes  — W.  H.  G.  Hale  and 
D.  E.  Cotton 


Published  by  the  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union 


Editor  M.  R.  D.  Seaward,  MSc,  PhD,  DSc,  FLS,  The  University,  Bradford  BD7  1DP 


Notice  to  Contributors  to  ‘The  Naturalist’ 


Manuscripts  (two  copies  if  possible),  typed  double-spaced  on  one  side  of  the  paper  only 
with  margins  at  top  and  left-hand  at  least  2.5cm  wide,  should  be  submitted.  Latin  names  of 
genera  and  species,  but  nothing  else,  should  be  underlined.  S.I.  Units  should  be  used 
wherever  possible.  Authors  must  ensure  that  their  references  are  accurately  cited,  and  that 
the  titles  of  the  journals  are  correctly  abbreviated.  Volumes  of  The  Naturalist  for  the  years 
1886  to  1975  have  been  retrospectively  numbered  11  to  100  to  accord  with  numbering 
before  and  after  this  period  (see  YNU  Bulletin  no.  3,  pp.  21-22  1985);  please  cite  these 
volume  numbers  in  all  references.  Tables  and  text-figures  should  be  prepared  on  separate 
sheets  of  paper.  Drawings  and  graphs,  drawn  about  twice  the  linear  size  they  are  to  appear, 
should  be  in  jet-black  Indian  ink,  and  legends  should  not  be  written  on  the  figures. 
Publishable  manuscripts  not  conforming  to  the  above  requirements  will  be  returned 
for  alteration. 

Photographic  Plates 

Readers  of  The  Naturalist  will  have  noticed  that  the  number  of  photographic  illustrations 
has  increased  in  recent  years.  Good  clear  photographs,  suitably  captioned,  to  accompany 
articles  or  as  independent  features,  such  as  the  bird  portraits  by  Arthur  Gilpin  in  recent 
issues,  are  always  welcome. 

To  encourage  this  development,  a long-standing  member  of  the  YNU,  who  wishes  to 
remain  anonymous,  has  most  generously  offered  to  make  a donation,  the  income  from 
which  would  finance  the  publication  of  a plate  or  equivalent  illustration  in  future 
issues  whenever  possible.  The  editor,  on  behalf  of  the  YNU,  wishes  to  record  his  deep 
appreciation  of  this  imaginative  gesture. 


© Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union  (Registered  Charity)  — 1993 

Single  Copies  may  be  made  of  single  articles  in  this  journal  provided  that  due  acknow- 
ledgement is  made  and  the  copies  are  for  non-profit  making  educational  or  private  use. 
Copying  of  more  than  one  article  or  multiple  copying  of  a single  article  is  forbidden  unless 
special  permission  has  been  obtained  from  the  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union.  Permission  is 
granted  for  the  use  of  brief  quotations  in  published  work  provided  that  acknowledgement 
of  the  source  is  clearly  stated,  but  the  use  of  substantial  sections  of  text  and  any  illustrative 
matter  requires  the  express  permission  of  the  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union. 


All  matters  other  than  subscriptions  should  be  addressed  to: 

Mr  John  A.  Newbould,  Tapton  House,  30  Moorlands,  Wickersley 
ROTHERHAM  S66  OAT. 

Items  which  should  be  sent  to  the  above  include:  All  membership  applications,  changes 
of  address,  resignations  and  problems  concerning  non-receipt  of  any  of  the  YNU’s 
publications.  Please  quote  the  membership  number  printed  underneath  your  address  on  all 
correspondence. 

Subscriptions  (unless  covered  by  Banker’s  Order)  should  continue  to  be  sent  to: 

Mr  D.  Bramley,  c/o  Doncaster  Museum,  Chequer  Road 
DONCASTER  DN1  2AE 


The  Naturalist  is  issued  free  to  individual  members  of  the  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union 
and  to  Affiliated  Societies. 


Institutions  and  Subscribers  £15.00. 


101 


FRESHWATER  ALGAE  IN  YORKSHIRE 

Presidential  Address  to  the  Yorkshire  Naturalists  Union, 
Wilton  Castle,  5 December  1992 

GORDON  F.  LEEDALE 


Freshwater  algal  records  for  Yorkshire  go  back  a long  way  but  there  have  been  relatively 
few  research  investigations  even  though  the  county  is  rich  in  interesting  lakes,  meres, 
ponds,  marshes,  rivers  and  streams.  Accordingly,  when  I first  came  to  Yorkshire  in  1959  I 
decided  to  make  use  of  these  habitats  in  my  research  which  is  mainly  concerned  with  cell 
structure  of  freshwater  microalgae,  especially  plankton  and,  above  all,  Euglena.  Taking 
stock  over  thirty  years  later  shows  that  these  studies  have  utilised  numerous  sites  but  I shall 
confine  my  remarks  today  to  just  two  of  the  most  interesting. 

Those  of  my  fellow  naturalists  who  study  beautiful  birds,  or  wild  flowers,  or  butterflies 
and  moths,  or  other  marvels  of  natural  history,  may  wonder  why  someone  actually  chooses 
green  slime!  Well,  as  I hope  to  show  you,  providing  one  has  access  to  good  microscopes, 
the  algae  are  just  as  beautiful  and  fascinating  as  any  other  organisms. 

Sawley  Dene 

My  first  site  is  Sawley  Dene,  a shallow  eutrophic  lake  in  North  Yorkshire  near  Fountains 
Abbey.  This  may  sound  familiar  to  some  of  you  since  I reported  on  the  periodicity  of 
phytoplankton  in  this  lake  with  two  students,  Helena  Cmiech  and  Tony  Rees,  in  The 
Naturalist  in  1984. 

Two  main  peaks  of  biomass  occur  annually,  diatoms  in  winter/spring  and  bluegreens  in 
late  summer.  One  of  my  hobbies  is  trying  to  capture  the  beauty  of  these  microorganisms  by 
colour  photography  in  the  light  microscope  and  black-and-white  photography  in  the 
scanning  electron  microscope.  What  I intend  to  do  today  is  pictorialise  our  1984  account  by 
showing  you  some  of  the  attractive  algae  that  occurred.  This  will  work  well  for  my  spoken 
address  but  will  not  make  much  impact  in  the  written  version  without  the  colour 
photographs! 

The  lake  is  actually  too  shallow  to  stratify  (become  layered)  and  is  really  a large  pond. 
However,  because  there  is  virtually  no  inflow  in  the  summer,  the  lake  acts  like  the 
epilimnion  (top  layer)  of  a stratified  lake  such  as  Esthwaite  in  the  Lake  District  and  nutrient 
inflow  in  autumn  acts  like  the  overturn  of  a larger  lake. 

Asterionella  and  other  diatoms  peak  in  February,  March  and  April,  bluegreens  in 
September  and  October,  and  other  algae  mainly  in  summer,  often  just  before  the 
bluegreens.  These  other  algae  include  dinoflagellates,  chrysophytes  like  Mallomonas,  the 
euglenoid  Trachelomonas , and  green  algae  such  as  Eudorina  and  desmids.  The  autumnal 
bluegreens  are  dominated  by  blooms  of  Anabaena  but  large  populations  of 
Aphanizomenon,  Gomphosphaeria  and  other  interesting  genera  also  occur. 

Helena  Cmiech  and  I have  written  a long  series  of  research  papers  on  the  cytological 
changes  in  the  bluegreens  in  natural  conditions  over  several  seasons  in  Sawley  Dene.  This 
is  the  first  study  of  its  kind  and  Sawley  Dene  is  now  known  worldwide.  Electron 
microscopy  shows  many  changes  in  cell  inclusions  as  filaments  appear,  grow,  develop  and 
age.  One  new  observation,  among  many,  is  that  akinetes  germinate  immediately  and  serve 
to  take  the  bluegreens  out  of  the  plankton  and  into  the  mud,  rather  than  being  resting 
spores. 

Tholthorpe  Village  Pond 

Our  second  destination  is  Tholthorpe  in  the  Vale  of  York  where,  in  the  summer  of  1980, 
the  village  pond  turned  bright  red  and  the  Parish  Council  anxiously  sought  advice  from 
biologists  at  Leeds  University.  “Is  it  dangerous?  Is  it  an  act  of  God  in  retribution  for  village 


Naturalist  118  (1993) 


102 


Freshwater  Algae  in  Yorkshire 

sins?  Can  it  be  got  rid  of?”  The  call  for  help  was  passed  to  me  and  after  viewing  the 
phenomenon  I said,  “Don’t  panic!  Very  interesting!  May  we  study  it  over  the  next  few 
years,  please?” 

I was  immediately  interested  because  I realised  that  the  redness  was  caused  by  an  algal 
bloom.  What  is  more,  the  appearance  of  a surface  skin  on  the  water  (looking  as  though 
someone  had  thrown  a pot  of  paint  over  the  pond),  bright  red  in  full  sunlight  but  turning 
green  in  overcast  conditions,  recalled  records  from  around  the  world  of  a red  species  of 
Euglena,  my  favourite  research  genus. 

A PhD  student  from  South  Africa,  Heather  Christie,  was  just  starting  to  work  with  me 
when  the  Red  Pond  of  Tholthorpe  manifested  itself  and  it  soon  became  her  research  topic. 
After  some  preliminary  studies,  our  main  biological  questions  were  (1)  What  causes  the  red 
bloom?  (2)  Why  has  it  suddenly  appeared?  (3)  Why  and  how  does  it  change  from  red  to 
green  to  red  again?  and  (4)  Why  does  it  float? 

Fortunately,  the  bloom  appeared  for  three  summers  from  1980  to  1982,  enabling  us  to 
collect  and  study  material  by  light  and  electron  microscopy  over  a prolonged  experimental 
period.  Yorkshire  TV  featured  it  as  “The  Traffic-Light  Pond”  and  even  the  tabloid  press 
took  up  the  story  (“Red  Cells  in  the  Sunlight”  - Ouch!).  In  my  spoken  address  I can  again 
show  you  the  beauty  of  the  colour-changing  cells  of  the  red  Euglena.  In  the  written  version 
we  will  have  to  manage  with  black-and-white,  including  just  a few  of  the  many  fascinating 
electron  micrographs  from  a very  detailed  study. 

(1)  The  red  colour  was  caused  by  a bloom  of  Euglena  sanguinea,  a rare  microorganism. 
In  the  floating  mass  the  rounded  cells  lie  in  a raft  of  mucilage;  transferred  to  clean  water 
they  elongate  and  start  to  swim.  The  first  record  of  “Bloody  Euglena”  perhaps  occurs  in 
Exodus  7,  14-20: 

The  Lord  said  to  Moses,  “Tell  Aaron  to  take  his  stick  and  hold  it  out  over  the 
rivers  and  pools  in  Egypt.  The  water  will  become  blood,  and  all  over  the  land  there 
will  be  blood  even  in  the  wooden  tubs  and  stone  jars”.  And  Aaron  raised  his  stick 
and  struck  the  surface  of  the  river,  and  all  the  water  in  it  was  turned  to  blood.  The 
fish  in  the  river  died,  and  it  smelt  so  bad  that  the  Egyptians  could  not  drink  from  it. 


FIGURES  1 & 2 

Living  cells  of  Euglena  sanuinea.  Light  microscopy.  X 800. 

Fig.l.  Green  cell  in  green  bloom;  the  red  droplets  (H)  surround  the  central 
nucleus  (N),  the  chloroplasts  (Chi)  are  exposed. 

Fig. 2.  Red  cell  in  red  bloom;  the  red  droplets  are  dispersed  in  the  cell  periphery, 
the  chloroplasts  are  hidden.  P = paramylon  (storage  material). 


Freshwater  Algae  in  Yorkshire  103 

In  1838,  Ehrenberg  considered  this  red  plague  was  caused  by  E.  sanguinea  in  shallow 
pools  following  annual  flooding  of  the  river.  Discovery  of  E.  sanguinea  in  the  Tholthorpe 
pond  enabled  us  to  carry  out  the  first  modem  study  of  its  structure.  Electron  microscopy 
revealed  radiating  chloroplast  ribbons  and  many  unique  ultrastructural  features. 

(2)  The  organism  appeared  suddenly  in  Tholthorpe  following  pig-slurry  manuring  of  the 
surrounding  farmland  and  a consequent  huge  increase  of  nitrate  levels  in  the  pond.  It  has  to 
be  presumed  that  E.  sanguinea  was  already  present  in  the  pond  in  small  numbers.  It  has 
never  been  recorded  from  anywhere  else  in  Britain  though  it  is  known  from  Europe,  China, 
Argentina  and  Australia.  Once  the  manuring  stopped  the  blooms  declined  and  by  1983  had 
ceased  altogether.  However,  scattered  living  cells  of  the  red  Euglena  can  still  be  found  in 
the  pond’s  mud  to  the  present  day. 


FIGURE  3 

Multiple  electron  micrographs  montage  showing  a transverse  section  through  a green  cell 
of  Euglena  sanguinea.  As  in  Fig.  1,  the  red  droplets  (H)  are  in  the  centre,  the  chloroplasts 
(Chi)  are  exposed  between  the  paramylon  granules  (P).  X 2000. 


104 


Freshwater  Algae  in  Yorkshire 


FIGURE  4 

Electron  micrographs  montage  showing  a section  through  a floating  cell  of  Euglena 
sanuinea  which  is  full  of  expanded  mucilage  bodies  (MOe).  X 5000. 


Freshwater  Algae  in  Yorkshire 


105 


(3)  On  cloudy  days  the  floating  bloom  was  green;  in  bright  sunlight  the  bloom  was  red. 
Change  from  green  to  red  when  the  sun  came  out  took  about  20  minutes.  When  the  pond 
was  green  individual  cells  were  green.  Vast  numbers  of  red  pigment  droplets  congregated 
in  the  centre  of  each  cell  while  the  green  chloroplast  ribbons  were  displayed  around  the  cell 
periphery  for  photosynthesis  (Fig.  1).  When  the  pond  was  red  individual  cells  were  red.  In 
bright  light  the  red  pigment  droplets  migrated  to  the  cell  surface  and  spread  out  as  a screen 
to  protect  the  chloroplasts  from  damage  (Fig. 2). 

Electron  microscopy  of  green  cells  showed  huge  numbers  of  carotenoid-containing  lipid 
droplets  in  the  cell  centre  (Fig.  3);  the  cell  periphery  was  occupied  by  chloroplasts,  storage 
granules  of  paramylon,  and  other  organelles  and  inclusions.  In  red  cells  and  cells  turning 
red,  the  pigment  droplets  were  dispersed  along  tracks  of  microtubules  and  microfibrils  to 
become  concentrated  at  the  cell  surface. 

(4)  Mature  floating  cells  also  became  filled  with  a bubbly  mass  of  expanded  mucilage 
bodies  (Fig.  4).  This  is  why  the  cells  float.  The  internal  changes  of  the  mucigenic  bodies 
from  very  dense  (Fig.  5)  to  fully  expanded  (Figs.  6-8)  are  unique  to  E.  sanguinea.  Most 
planktonic  organisms  swim  to  the  water  surface  in  dull  light  and  into  the  shade  or  deeper 
water  in  full  sunlight.  Because  E.  sanguinea  cells  float  they  have  evolved  a unique  method 
of  light  protection.  A mobile  screen  of  hundreds  of  sunshade  droplets  that  are  centralised  in 
the  cell  when  conditions  are  optimum  for  photosynthesis,  spread  out  in  sunlight  to  protect 
the  chloroplasts  from  sunburn. 

Sawley  Dene  and  Tholthorpe  Pond  are  just  two  of  the  freshwater  sites  in  Yorkshire  that 
have  provided  ideal  situations  for  algal  research.  Studies  will  continue  and  I hope  that 
future  generations  of  microscopists  will  be  as  enthralled  as  I have  been  by  the  intricate 
structure,  fascinating  biology  and  supreme  beauty  of  the  microalgae. 


FIGURES  5 & 6 

EM  sections  of  mucilage  bodies  of  Euglena  sanuinea.  X 70,000. 

Fig.  5.  Condensed  body  (initial  state),  showing  a dense  granule  and  a membranous  region. 
Fig.  6.  Body  starting  to  expand;  the  membranous  region  is  larger  and  more  diffuse. 


106 


Freshwater  Algae  in  Yorkshire 


FIGURES  7 & 8 

EM  sections  of  mucilage  bodies  of  Euglena  sanguinea. 

Fig.  7.  Part  of  the  membranous  region  has  expanded  into  a 
mucilaginous  mass;  the  body  is  much  larger.  X 35,000. 

Fig.  8.  All  the  membraneous  region  is  now  bubbly  mucilage  but  the  dense 
granule  can  still  be  recognised.  X 50,000. 


107 


ANNUAL  AND  LONG-TERM  OBSERVATIONS  ON  THE 
CNIDARIA  INHABITING  AN  INTERTIDAL  MUSSEL  BED 
IN  MORECAMBE  BAY,  LANCASHIRE 

DAVID  JONES 

Institute  of  Environmental  & Biological  Sciences,  Lancaster  University, 
Bailrigg,  Lancaster  LAI  4YQ 


Introduction 

Whilst  there  have  been  numerous  studies  of  the  flora  and  fauna  of  rocky,  sandy  and  muddy 
shores,  usually  over  a relatively  short  time  span,  little  has  been  published  on  the  biota  of 
mussel  beds,  particularly  that  based  on  observations  made  over  an  extended  period.  This 
paper  describes  the  distribution  in  space  and  time  of  Cnidaria  species  on  the  Heysham 
mussel  bed  (grid.  ref.  SD4163).  The  period  of  study  was  1956-1990,  excluding  1962, 
September  1973-January  1976,  and  January  1979-1982. 

Study  Area  and  Methods 

The  study  area  and  methods  employed  here  have  been  fully  described  elsewhere  (Jones  & 
Miller  1966;  Jones  & Clare  1977).  The  mussel  bed  is  on  an  area  of  small  stones,  with 
scattered  large  stones  and  boulders,  and  is  exposed  to  strong  tidal  currents.  The  common 
mussel,  Mytilus  edulis  L.,  is  widespread  and  abundant  below  MLWN,  but  more  localised 
above.  Many  pools  are  present  on  the  mussel  bed,  which  are  submerged  every  day. 

Each  area  of  the  shore  was  examined  for  about  2 hours,  by  walking  a defined  search  path 
and  examining  the  same  stones,  boulders  and  pools  each  month.  If  conditions  proved 
unfavourable  the  nearest  pools  or  boulders  were  examined.  The  tidal  levels  and  vertical 
ranges  of  these  areas  have  been  described  elsewhere  (Jones  1987).  Search  paths  1 and  2 
were  both  recorded  as  high  areas  (the  data  from  which  were  pooled),  search  path  3 as 
middle  area,  search  path  4 as  low  area,  and  search  path  5 as  LWS.  The  latter  area  presented 
a special  problem  since  during  winter  months  complete  daylight  searches  could  not  be 
made;  at  such  periods  a torch  was  used.  Partial  examination  did  at  times  affect  the  recorded 
abundance  of  certain  species;  on  these  occasions  the  abundance  of  organisms  before  and 
after  the  partial  examination  was  used  to  estimate  the  abundance  for  these  months.  The 
abundance  of  species  during  the  last  4 months  of  1973  was  estimated  where  necessary  from 
the  results  obtained  in  other  years.  The  estimated  values  ranged  from  0.1%  of  total 
observations  for  Gonothyraea  loveni  (Allman)  to  4.3%  for  Metridium  senile  (L.). 

An  arbitral  system  of  recording  population  sizes  was  followed  using  the  terms  “rare”  - 
1-3  individuals  or  small  colonies,  “frequent”  - more  than  3,  but  inconspicuous,  “common” 
- conspicuous  in  some  habitats,  and  “abundant”  - conspicuous  and  using  most  habitats. 
These  categories  were  scored  1-5  respectively;  0=absent.  While  essentially  subjective,  this 
method  enables  broad  comparisons  to  be  made  between  the  abundance  of  species  over 
months  and  years.  The  temperature  of  the  sea  edge  at  low  water  was  recorded  on  every 
visit. 

Throughout  this  paper  the  taxonomy  and  nomenclature  of  Haywood  and  Ryland  (1990) 
has  been  followed. 

Results  and  Discussion 
Hydroida 

The  following  taxa  were  often  recorded:  Tubularia  larynx  (Ellis  and  Solander),  Sarsia 
tubulosa.  (M.Sars.),  Clava  multicornis  (Forskal),  Hydractinia  echinata  (Fleming), 
Bougainvillia  ramosa  (van  Beneden),  Gonothyraea  loveni  (Allman),  Laomedea  flexuosa 
(Alder),  Hartaubella  gelatinosa  (Pallas)  and  Obelia  spp..  The  vertical  distribution  of  the 
hydroids,  annual  variation  in  abundance  and  reproductive  activity,  and  long-term  changes 


Naturalist  118  (1993) 


108  Annual  and  Long-term  Observations  on  the  Cnidaria  in  Morecambe  Bay,  Lancashire 


TABLE  1 

Hydroid  species  infrequently  or  rarely  recorded  on  Heysham  mussel  bed. 


Species 

Records 

Reproduction 

Corymorpha  nutans  M.Sars 

First  recorded  1970,  then  during  10 
of  the  remaining  years 

May  and  June 

Garveia  nutans  Wright 

1956-61,  1968-90.  Conspicuous 
Nov-May 

January-May 

Dicoryne  conferta  (Alder) 

Sept.  1966,  Aug.  1969,  Feb.  1970, 
Aug.  1976. 

Present  on  each 
occasion 

Clytia  johnstoni  (Alder) 

First  recorded  Nov.  1966,  then  7 of 
the  remaining  years 

Always  present 

Opercularella  lacerata 
(Johnston) 

June  1977,  Sept.  & Nov.  1978, 
Feb.  & June  1979 

June 

Halecium  halecinum  (L.) 

One  recording  June  1977 

Present 

Dynamena  pumila  (L.) 

One  recording  August  1958 

Present 

Amphisbelia  operculata  (L.) 

One  recording  Feb.  1973 

Present 

Rhizogeton  nudum  Broch 

Every  year  since  1987 

April-May 

Hartaubella  Sarsia 

getatinosa  tubulosa 

(stage  1) 


Tubularia  Hartaubella 

larynx  gelatinosa 

(stage  2) 


I til 


Hydractinia 

echinata 


Bougainvillia  Metridium  Sagartia 

ramosa  senile  spp. 


i I I 

0 50  100 


FIGURE  1 

Vertical  distribution  of  hydroid  and  anthozoan  species  on  Heysham  mussel  bed. 
Relative  abundance  shown  as  percentage  of  all  records  at  each  shore  level. 

H = high  area;  M = middle  area;  L = low  area;  LWS  = low  water  springs. 


Annual  and  Long-term  Observations  on  the  Cnidaria  in  Morecambe  Bay,  Lancashire  109 


Hartaubella  gelatinosa 
(stage  T) 


Sarsia  tubulosa 


Tubularia  larynx 
XXX 


Hartaubella  gelatinosa 
(stage  2) 


Clava  multicornis 
XXXXXX 


Gonothyraea  loveni 
* XXX 


Obelia  spp. 


Laomedea  flexuosa 


Hydractinia  echinata 


Bougainvillia  ramosa 


Metridium  senile 


Sagartia  spp 


J FMAMJ  JASOND  J FMAMJ  JASOND 


FIGURE  2 

Seasonal  succession  of  hydroid  and  anthozoan  species  on  Heysham  mussel  bed. 

Mean  abundance  score  (absent  = 0,  rare  = 1,  frequent  = 2,  common  = 3,  abundant  = 4) 
for  all  shore  levels  combined  expressed  as  % maximum  possible  score. 

• *■  Gonophores  or  gonothecae  present,  xxx  mature  gonophores  or  gonothecae  present. 

in  abundance  are  summarised  in  Figures  1-3.  Records  of  the  occurrence  and  timing  of 
reproduction  of  other  hydroid  species  are  given  in  Table  1. 

There  was  a clear  pattern  of  vertical  zonation  (Fig.  1):  G.  loveni , L.  flexuosa  and 
C.  multicornis  being  particularly  abundant  at  the  highest  areas  searched,  S.  tubulosa, 
B.  ramosa,  Obelia  spp.  and  H.  gelatinosa  stages  1 and  2 mainly  using  the  middle,  low  and 
LWS  areas,  with  H.  echinata  and  T.  larynx  at  the  lowermost  area.  Generally  the  less 
common  species  (Table  1)  were  found  at  the  lowermost  areas  of  the  shore,  the  exception 
being  Clytia  johnstoni  (Alder)  which  occurred  up  to  the  middle  search  path,  Rhizogeton 
nudum  Broch  sharing  the  habitat  of  C.  multicornis  at  middle  and  high  areas,  and 
Opercularella  lacerata  (Johnston)  found  only  in  the  high  area. 

There  was  a marked  seasonal  succession  of  abundance  (Fig.  2).  H.  gelatinosa  stage  1 and 
S.  tubulosa  were  the  earliest  hy droids  to  peak,  in  late  winter,  the  last  being  B.  ramosa  in 
autumn.  Garveia  nutans  (Wright)  (Table  1)  attained  maximum  abundance  in  the  late  winter 
and  spring,  Corymorpha  nutans  M.  Sars.  and  Sertularia  argentea  L.  in  the  early  summer. 


Hartaubella  gelatinosa  Sarsia  tubulosa  Tubularia  larynx  Hartaubella  gelatinosa 

(stage  1)  (stage  2) 


1 10  Annual  and  Long-term  Observations  on  the  Cnidaria  in  Morecambe  Bay,  Lancashire 


aauepunqe  % 


FIGURE  3 

Long-term  patterns  of  abundance  of  hydroid  and  anthozoan  species  on  Heysham  mussel  bed.  % abundance  as  in  Fig  2. 


Annual  and  Long-term  Observations  on  the  Cnidaria  in  Morecambe  Bay,  Lancashire  111 

Clava  multicornis  occurred  on  boulders,  stones  and  shells.  Colonies  were  always  present 
on  some  boulders.  While  occasionally  hydranths  were  visible  all  year  round,  during  the 
autumn  months  they  generally  only  existed  in  the  form  of  a resting  stolon.  Colonies  settling 
on  stones  and  shells  did  not  become  permanently  established.  Gonophores  were  found  in 
clusters  behind  the  lower  tentacles,  becoming  mature  in  April,  May  and  June. 

Gonothyraea  loveni  was  found  on  boulders,  stones  and  shells.  Colonies  on  the  high  area 
boulders  were  present  throughout  the  year,  while  colonies  on  stones  and  shells  on  other 
areas  only  occurred  between  April  and  July.  These  latter  colonies  were  generally  abundant 
but  did  not  occur  every  year.  The  gonothecae  produced  hanging  medusae  that  were  never 
released. 

Laomedea  flexuosa  formed  permanent  colonies  on  certain  high  and  middle  area 
boulders,  often  extending  onto  mussels  that  were  attached  to  the  boulders. 

Tubularia  larynx  continuously  settled  then  disappeared  from  boulders,  stones  and  shells, 
never  producing  permanent  colonies.  It  does  not  have  a planktonic  stage,  the  actinula  larva 
sinking  to  the  substrate,  where  it  moves  around  on  its  tentacles  before  eventually  attaching 
itself.  Daughter  colonies  therefore  would  not  be  expected  to  settle  very  far  from  the  parent 
colony;  this  may  explain  why  when  T.  larynx  was  lost  after  the  cold  winter  of  1962-63  the 
level  of  abundance  recorded  before  1963  was  not  restored  until  1976  (Fig.  3). 

Sarsia  tubulosa  was  found  in  all  months  with  the  exception  of  July,  August  and 
September.  Settlement  was  on  boulders,  stones  and  shells.  Free-swimming  medusae  were 
produced  during  the  first  4 months  of  the  year  (Fig.  2).  Colonies  appeared  on  the  same 
parts  of  some  boulders  most  years,  suggesting  that  a resting  stolon  may  produce  hydranths 
the  following  season. 

Spherical  colonies  of  S.  tubulosa  appeared  in  1969,  becoming  abundant  during  1970. 
They  were  common  in  1978  and  1985,  rare  in  1972,  1977,  1979,  1984  and  1987.  A 
possible  explanation  for  the  formation  of  the  rolling  colonies  is  given  in  Clare  et  al.  (1971). 
The  planula  larva  may  have  been  affected  by  a chemical  pollutant  followed  by  recovery 
and  multipolar  growth  under  natural  conditions  in  the  plankton. 

Hartaubella  gelatinosa  stages  1 and  2 settled  on  boulders,  stones  and  shells,  but  not  on 
the  same  ones  season  after  season.  It  is  therefore  assumed  that  the  littoral  population  is 
maintained  by  settlement  of  larvae  from  the  plankton.  Gonothecae  were  rarely  found  on 
stage  1,  yet  reproductive  structures  were  always  present  on  stage  2.  Both  stages  appeared 
without  great  variations  in  abundance  every  year  of  the  study  period  (Fig.  3). 

Only  Obelia  dichotoma  (L.)  was  positively  identified  amongst  the  abundant  Obelia 
colonies  that  were  present  during  the  summer  months,  but  other  species  may  have  been 
present.  Reproduction  was  by  medusae  with  larval  settlement  from  the  plankton  on 
boulders,  stones  and  shells.  Colonies  were  not  found  on  the  same  ones  each  year.  No 
obvious  reason  for  the  large  variation  in  abundance  (Fig.  2)  could  be  found;  however,  their 
settlement  period  of  late  spring  and  summer  means  that  the  demand  for  habitats  is  at  its 
greatest  during  settlement. 

Active  colonies  of  Bougainvillia  ramosa  were  found  on  stones  and  shells  during  the  last 
5 months  of  the  year,  occasionally  remaining  in  skeleton  form  until  February. 
Reproduction  was  by  medusae  during  September,  October  and  November  (Fig.  2). 

Hydractinia  echinata  was  found  mainly  on  gastropod  shells  occupied  by  the  hermit  crab 
Pagurus  bernhardus  (L.),  but  colonies  were  occasionally  found  on  stones  and  wood,  and 
on  one  occasion  on  the  carapace  of  the  shore  crab  Carcinus  maenas  (L.).  No  reason  for  the 
steady  decline  in  abundance  of  H.  echinata  (Fig.  3)  could  be  found;  the  numbers  of 
P.  bernhardus  remained  fairly  constant  throughout  the  survey.  However  once  the  decline 
had  commenced,  the  relative  immobility  of  its  larvae  may  have  contributed  to  further 
reduction  in  abundance,  given  the  specialised  nature  of  its  microhabitat. 

No  data  are  presented  for  Sertularia  argentea  L.,  even  though  it  was  abundant  during 
some  years,  because  many  colonies  remained  in  skeleton  form  for  long  periods  and  could 
not  be  unequivocally  separated  in  the  field  from  living  forms.  It  was  recorded  as  frequent 
every  year  from  1956-61,  and  rare  from  1963-78,  with  the  exceptions  of  1966  and  1967 


1 12  Annual  and  Long-term  Observations  on  the  Cnidaria  in  Morecambe  Bay,  Lancashire 

when  none  were  found.  It  was  common  or  abundant  from  1978  to  the  end  of  the  survey. 
Settlement  from  the  plankton  took  place  in  July,  August  and  September. 

Of  the  hydroids  that  were  infrequently  or  rarely  recorded  (Table  1),  G.  nutans  was  the 
most  consistent  in  occurrence  although  only  found  on  one  group  of  boulders  at  LWS.  It 
was  active  from  November  to  the  following  May  and  gonophores  were  produced  from 
January  to  May  (Table  1).  During  the  remaining  months  it  was  present  in  a resting  stage. 
The  colonies  were  lost  after  the  cold  winter  of  1962-63  until  1968  when  they  returned. 
Settlement  was  on  the  same  boulders. 

Rhizogeton  nudum  was  recorded  for  the  first  time  in  the  British  Isles  during  this  survey 
(Jones  1992).  It  settled  on  boulders  and  mussel  shells  attached  to  these  boulders,  with 
already  established  colonies  of  C.  multicornis,  in  April  and  May  of  1987  and  each 
subsequent  year.  In  1989  it  also  appeared  in  March.  Gonophores  were  observed  during 
April  and  May.  The  ovoid  female  gonophores  have  ova  which  on  release  remain  adhering 
to  the  gonophore  by  mucus  for  some  time.  The  immature  male  gonophore  has  a spadix;  as 
it  matures  it  becomes  white  with  sperm  within.  As  R.  nudum  appeared  at  the  same  sites 
each  year,  it  seems  likely  that  a resting  stolon  remains  until  conditions  again  favour 
development. 

Corymorpha  nutans  was  only  found  from  1970,  appearing  in  10  of  the  remaining  years. 
Individuals  were  found  between  mussels,  attached  by  a network  of  adhesive  “rootlets”  to 
the  muddy  substrate.  It  was  always  recorded  as  rare  and  no  specimens  remained  for  more 
than  one  month. 

Clytia  johnstoni  was  first  found  in  1966  and  appeared  in  7 of  the  remaining  years.  It  was 
found  on  stones,  shells,  seaweeds  and  the  hydroid  of  S.  argentea.  It  is  not  a conspicuous 
hydroid,  and  colonies  found  in  one  month  had  disappeared  by  the  next.  C.  johnstoni  was 
most  likely  to  be  found  from  July  to  November.  Gonothecae  were  always  present. 

Opercularella  lacerata  was  only  found  on  one  high  area  boulder  and  on  mussels 
attached  to  the  boulder.  Only  5 recordings  were  made  between  February  and  November. 
Reproductive  structures  were  present  each  time. 

Dicoryne  conferta  was  found  on  the  shells  of  Buccinum  undatum  L.  It  is  perhaps 
surprising  that  only  4 sightings  occurred  during  such  long  term  observations  because 
substantial  numbers  of  B.  undatum  were  found,  particularly  during  the  winter  months  when 
egg-laying  was  taking  place. 

Halecium  halecinum,  Dynamena  pumila  and  Amphisbelia  operculata  each  failed  to  form 
permanent  colonies,  only  one  recording  of  each  species  being  made  throughout  the  survey. 
The  study  period  covers  years  when  extreme  temperatures  were  recorded,  the  lowest  being 
during  the  cold  winter  of  1962-63,  when  pools  were  covered  with  ice,  and  ice  floes 
occurred  in  the  edge  of  the  tide.  In  the  winter  of  1978-79  pools  were  again  covered  with  ice 
but  the  cold  weather  was  not  as  severe  or  as  prolonged.  The  warmest  winter  recorded  was 
1989-90,  and  the  warmest  summers  1976,  1983,  1984  and  1989.  During  the  cold  winter  of 
1962-63  two  of  the  most  abundant  hydroids,  H.  gelatinosa  stage  1 and  S.  tubulosa, 
maintained  their  abundance  (Fig.  3),  and  apart  from  T.  larynx  the  species  present  during  the 
winter  months  generally  showed  little  variation  in  abundance.  Crisp  (1964)  found  that  the 
cold  winter  of  1962-63  had  little  effect  on  hydroid  species.  It  was  noted,  however,  that  taxa 
which  peak  during  the  spring  and  summer,  H.  gelatinosa.  stage  2 and  Obelia  spp.,  were  less 
abundant  during  1963.  This  is  surprising  because  when  they  settled  temperatures  were 
close  to  normal.  As  these  species  do  not  develop  each  year  from  a resting  stolon,  perhaps 
their  parent  colonies  in  the  sublittoral  zone,  or  the  planktonic  stages  from  these  parent 
colonies,  were  in  some  way  affected.  The  cold  winter  of  1978-79  produced  only  a small 
decline  in  the  abundance  of  hydroid  species  from  the  previous  year.  The  abundance  of 
hydroids  was  well  maintained  during  the  warm  winter  of  1989-90.  While  generally  high 
numbers  occurred  during  the  warm  summer  of  1976,  it  is  unfortunate  that  no  records  are 
available  for  the  previous  3 years  for  comparison.  However,  abundances  were  also  high 
during  the  warm  summers  of  1983  and  1989. 

Methods  of  reproduction  have  a bearing  on  the  presence  and  yearly  patterns  of 


Annual  and  Long-term  Observations  on  the  Cnidaria  in  Morecambe  Bay,  Lancashire  1 1 3 

abundance  of  hydroid  species.  Clava  multicornis,  G.  loveni  and  L.flexuosa  were  present  on 
some  boulders  throughout  the  study  period.  All  have  planulae  that  settle  quickly  in  the 
vicinity  of  parent  colonies. 

Several  species  of  sea  slug  (Gastropoda:  Opisthobranchia)  were  found  on  hydroids: 
Tergipes  tergipes  (Forskal)  and  Eubranchus  exiguus  (Alder  & Hancock)  on  Obelia  spp., 
G.  loveni  and  H.  gelatinosa,  Cuthona  nana  (Alder  & Hancock)  on  H.  echinata,  Cuthona 
concinna  (Alder  & Hancock)  on  H.  gelatinosa  and  T.  larynx  and  Doto  coronata  (Gmelin) 
on  S.  tubulosa,  S.  argentea  and  C.  multicornis.  Sea  slugs  were  seen  to  feed  on  hydroids,  but 
there  was  no  evidence  that  such  predation  significantly  reduced  abundance.  S.  argentea 
was  occasionally  covered  with  tiny  mussel  spat. 

Actiniaria 

The  following  taxa  were  recorded:  Metridium  senile  L.,  Sagartia  species:  S.  elegans  var. 
miniata  Dalyell,  var.  nivea  (Gosse)  and  var.  rosea  (Gosse),  S.  troglodytes  var.  decorata 
(Price)  and  var.  ornata  (Holds worth).  Other  species  recorded  were  Actinia  equina  L., 
Urticina  felina  L.  and  Diadumene  cincta  (Stephenson). 

Metridium  senile  var.  dianthus  was  readily  identified,  but  only  rarely  recorded.  The 
abundances  shown  in  Fig.  3 are  of  small  forms  of  M.  senile.  They  used  all  habitats,  being 
found  on  boulders,  stones  and  shells  and  partly  buried  in  the  substrate  with  or  without 
attachment  to  a solid  surface.  During  some  summers  abundant  populations  appeared  in  the 
latter  habitat  at  LWS.  These  were  generally  lost  during  the  winter  months  when  many 
unattached  specimens  were  found  rolling  in  the  tide.  Colonies  on  boulders  formed  more 
stable  populations.  One  such  colony  existed  beneath  a boulder  in  the  high  area  throughout 
the  study  period,  individuals  never  growing  to  more  than  2 cm  across  the  disc.  The  yearly 
variations  in  abundance  (Fig.  3)  were  mainly  due  to  the  arrival  and  eventual  success  of  the 
individuals  using  the  substrate  at  LWS.  Laceration  of  the  base  and  budding  were  observed 
as  methods  of  reproduction. 

Adult  Sagartia  species,  with  the  exception  of  S.  troglodytes  var.  ornata,  were  found  with 
their  columns  buried  in  the  substrate.  Juveniles  were  located  beneath  stones  and  shells. 
Assessing  their  abundance  was  extremely  difficult  because  specimens  only  occasionally 
remained  open  when  the  tide  receded,  generally  contracting  and  leaving  a small  hole  in  the 
substrate  to  denote  their  presence.  While  their  numbers  were  greatly  reduced  during  the 
cold  winter  of  1962-63,  those  found  were  healthy,  and  the  less  prolonged  cold  winter  of 
1978-79,  had  little  effect  on  their  abundance. 

Although  good  numbers  were  again  noted  in  1967  it  was  not  until  1979  that  the  level  of 
abundance  recorded  before  1963  was  restored  (Fig.  3).  Sagartia  species  were  recorded  in 
Morecambe  Bay  by  Gosse  (1860),  but  no  details  of  abundance  or  distribution  were  given. 
Sagartia  troglodytes  var.  ornata  was  only  found  in  the  high  area,  and  was  not  common. 
Specimens  were  partly  buried  in  the  substrate  or  attached  to  stones  or  shells.  They  were 
recorded  each  month  from  March  1957  to  December  1960,  but  subsequently  only  3 
recordings  were  made,  one  in  1961  and  two  in  1971. 

Recording  of  D.  cincta  was  restricted  to  one  colony.  Although  they  were  sometimes 
found  on  a group  of  boulders  at  LWS  it  was  not  possible  in  the  field  to  separate  them  from 
small  M.  senile  that  shared  this  habitat.  The  recorded  colony  was  a densely  crowded  cluster 
beneath  an  overhang  on  a high  area  boulder.  This  colony  persisted  from  January  1956  to 
August  1964  when  unfortunately  the  substrate  accreted  to  cover  the  overhang. 

U.  felina  was  found  partly  buried  in  the  substrate  at  LWS.  It  was  present  every  year 
throughout  the  study,  being  most  frequent  from  1956  to  1960,  and  1983  to  1990.  It  did  not 
form  obvious  aggregations.  No  juveniles  appeared  in  the  population. 

A.  equina  was  most  often  recorded  in  the  high  area.  Its  appearance  was  sporadic; 
individuals  would  appear  one  month  only  to  disappear  the  next.  However,  3 individuals 
remained  on  a stone  in  one  pool  for  10  months. 

The  sea  slug  Aeolidia  papillosa  (L.)  was  seen  attacking  M.  senile , Sagartia  species,  and 
U.  felina.  The  defence  of  M.  senile  was  to  extend  the  column  and  then  detach  itself. 


1 14  Annual  and  Long-term  Observations  on  the  Cnidaria  in  Morecambe  Bay,  Lancashire 

Sagartia  species  withdrew  into  the  substrate,  juvenile  specimens  beneath  stones  or  shells, 
expanding  the  column  and  ejecting  acontia.  U.felim.  had  no  apparent  defence. 

The  shore  levels  and  microhabitats  occupied  by  the  anthozoans  on  the  mussel  bed  are 
consistent  with  those  recorded  by  Stephenson  (1928,  1935)  and  Manuel  (1981). 

Scyphozoa 

Colonies  of  the  scyphistoma  of  Aurelia  aurita  (L.)  were  found  on  boulders  and  stones  at 
LWS  in  January  1956  and  July  1956,  57,  58  and  60.  During  1958  they  remained  until 
November. 

Acknowledgements 

I would  like  to  express  my  gratitude  to  Dr  T.  G.  Piearce  for  critically  reading  the 
manuscript  and  offering  valuable  suggestions,  Mr  A.  Dalton  for  help  in  the  field, 
Mr  P.  W.  H.  Flint  for  preparing  the  illustrations  and  to  my  wife  Amy  whose  unending 
patience  and  understanding  have  been  invaluable. 

References 

Clare,  J.,  Jones,  D.  and  O’Sullivan,  A.  J.  (1971)  On  the  occurrence  of  detached  spherical 
colonies  of  the  hydroids  Sarsia  tubulosa  and  Tubularia  larynx  in  Morecambe  Bay. 
J.  Mar.  Biol.  Ass.,  U.K.  55:  495-503. 

Crisp,  D.  J.  (1964)  The  effects  of  the  severe  winter  of  1962-63  on  marine  life  in  Britain. 
J.Anim.Ecol.  33:  165-201. 

Gosse,  P.  H.  (1860)  Actinologia  Britannica:  a history  of  the  British  sea  anemones  and 
corals.  Van  Voorst,  London. 

Hayward,  P.  J.  and  Ryland,  J.  S.  (1990)  The  marine  fauna  of  the  British  Isles  and  North- 
West  Europe , vols  1 & 2.  Clarendon  Press,  Oxford. 

Jones,  D.  (1987)  Distribution  and  abundance  of  the  starfish  Asterias  rubens  L.  on  an 
intertidal  mussel  bed  in  Morecambe  Bay,  Lancashire.  Naturalist  112:  59-65. 

Jones,  D.  (1992)  Rhizogeton  nudum  (Cnidaria  Hydroida)  in  the  British  Isles.  J.  Mar.  Biol. 
Ass.,  U.K.  72:  721-722. 

Jones,  D.  and  Clare,  J.  (1977)  Annual  and  long-term  fluctuations  in  the  abundance  of  fish 
species  inhabiting  the  intertidal  mussel  bed  in  Morecambe  Bay,  Lancashire.  Zool.  J. 
Linn.  Soc.  60:  1 17-172. 

Jones,  D.  & Miller,  P.  J.  (1966)  Seasonal  migrations  of  the  common  goby  Pomatoschistus 
microps  (Kroyer)  in  Morecambe  Bay  and  elsewhere.  Hydrobiologia  27:  515-528. 

Manuel,  R.  L.  (1981)  British  Anthozoa.  Keys  and  notes  for  the  identification  of  the  species. 

In:  Synopses  of  the  British  Fauna  (New  series)  No.  18.  Academic  Press,  London. 
Stephenson,  T.  A.  (1928)  The  British  Sea  Anemones , Vol.  1 . The  Ray  Society,  London. 
Stephenson,  T.  A.  (1935)  The  British  Sea  Anemones,  Vol.  2.  The  Ray  Society,  London. 


A REVIEW  OF  THE  GRAYLING  ( Thymallus  thymallus  L.) 
IN  YORKSHIRE  AND  SOME  RECORDS  OF  TRANSFERS 
OF  FISH  AND  OVA 


115 


LESLIE  MAGEE 

4 Park  Square,  Pool-in-Wharfedale,  Otley  LS21  1LB 


Introduction 

The  European  grayling  {Thymallus  thymallus)  is  a salmonid  fish  which  is  found  in  cold 
water  between  latitudes  of  40°  and  70°  north.  The  very  similar  Arctic  grayling  T.  arcticus 
is  widespread  in  suitable  habitats  in  Asia  and  in  North  America.  The  grayling  is  instantly 
distinguishable  from  all  other  salmonids  by  its  very  large  erectable  dorsal  fin.  The  name 
grayling  is  at  least  five  centuries  old  and  is  believed  to  be  a corruption  of  “gray  lines”,  a 
name  derived  from  the  distinct  pattern  of  dark  longitudinal  lines  on  its  flanks.  The 
derivation  of  its  other  colloquial  name  ‘Umber’,  now  obsolete,  is  more  obscure  and  various 
theories  have  been  put  forward  (Magee  1992). 

The  grayling  is  not  an  introduced  species  in  England  but  whether  or  not  it  re-colonised 
England  from  sub-arctic  regions  of  Northern  Europe,  or  from  the  Danube  basin  via  the 
east-flowing  rivers  of  England  while  England  was  still  joined  to  the  European  mainland 
remains  a matter  of  speculation  (Platts  1939). 

Historically,  the  grayling  was  thought  to  be  confined  to  some  rivers  draining  into  the 
North  Sea  and  the  English  Channel  but  its  distribution  in  the  British  Isles  became  better 
understood  and  well  documented  during  the  19th  century.  The  main  reasons  for  this  were 
the  rapid  growth  of  the  railways  from  1840  onwards,  making  regions  formerly  remote 
readily  accessible  to  sportsmen  with  the  time  and  the  means  to  travel,  and  the  profusion  of 
angling  literature  after  Waterloo,  especially  books  on  flyfishing  and  the  development  of 
pisciculture,  particularly  trout  breeding. 

The  grayling  is  considered  to  be  an  endangered  species  in  Britain:  it  has  become  extinct 
in  some  streams  where  it  was  formerly  abundant  and  is  declining  in  others.  The  causes  of 
the  decline  are  various  but  pollution,  water  extraction,  exploitation,  habitat  changes  and 
disease  have  all  played  some  part  (Magee  1992). 

Habitats 

The  grayling  does  not  occur  in  Ireland  and  does  not  naturally  inhabit  lakes  but  there  are  at 
least  two  lakes,  Gouthwaite  Reservoir  in  Yorkshire  and  Llyn  Tegid  in  Wales,  where  the  fish 
are  known  to  migrate  from  the  river  to  the  lake  and  vice  versa  at  different  times  of  the  year. 

It  has  two  distinct  types  of  habitat  in  the  British  Isles  and  certainly  has  a preference  for 
alkaline  waters.  The  first  type  of  habitat  is  the  mid-reaches  of  stony-bottomed  spate  rivers 
which  also  have  pools  and  glides  with  sand  and  gravel,  such  as  the  Wharfe  and  the  Ure. 
The  second  type  is  the  so-called  chalk  streams  of  the  lowlands  which  are  spring  fed  and 
have  a less  rapid  descent  from  the  sources,  such  as  the  Costa  Beck  (North  Yorkshire)  and 
the  Test  in  Hampshire. 

Distribution 

Grayling  remains  have  been  found  in  archaeological  deposits  in  the  York  area  dating 
from  the  1st  to  the  12th  centuries  (Jones  1988).  This  tends  to  confirm  that  the  grayling  is 
indigenous  to  the  Yorkshire  Ouse  river  system,  and  that  the  historical  records  for  the 
Humber  are  correct,  if  one  accepts  that  in  that  context  ‘Humber’  refers  to  the  system  of 
rivers  draining  into  the  Humber  rather  than  the  specific  river.  Taylor  (1800),  writing  of 
Yorkshire  rivers,  is  precise:  “This  county  is  watered  by  an  abundance  of  rivers;  the  principal 
of  which  are  the  Humber , though  this  is  not  properly  a distinct  river,  as  not  having  a spring- 
head of  its  own,  but  rather  the  mouth  or  receptacle  of  divers  other  rivers  . . . especially  the 


Naturalist  118  (1993) 


116 


A Review  of  the  Grayling  in  Yorkshire 


Trent , the  Ouse".  Especially  interesting  is  his  mention  of  the  Golden  Umber.  “The  river 
Humber  is  said  to  produce  the  greatest  quantity  of  that  sort  of  fish  which  in  this  part  of  the 
country  is  called  the  Golden  Umber,  and  in  other  counties  the  Grayling;  and  though  some 
are  of  the  opinion  that  they  really  are  a different  species  of  fish,  yet  I am  convinced  that  they 
are  not,  but  that  different  counties  give  them  separate  names.”  One  20th  century  writer  has 
remarked  on  the  variation  in  colouring  of  Yorkshire  grayling:  “some  golden,  some  steely 
and  others  lilac  . . .”  (Rhygini  1968).  All  the  main  rivers  draining  into  the  Ouse,  with  the 
exception  of  the  Calder,  still  have  populations  of  grayling. 

The  earliest  printed  records  of  grayling  in  the  British  Isles  are  to  be  found  in  angling 
literature,  the  first  being  that  in  A Treatise  of  Fysshinge  wyth  an  Angle  (1496)  printed  by 
Wynkin  de  Word  at  Westminster.  The  second  is  that  of  Isaac  Walton  in  The  Compleat 
Angler  (1653)  where  he  mentions  its  presence  in  “the  Derbyshire  Dove,  the  Trent  and  some 
small  rivers  as  that  which  runs  by  Salisbury”.  This  is  the  first  mention  that  I have  been  able 
to  find  of  the  grayling  living  in  rivers  draining  into  the  Humber. 

The  first  printed  reference  to  the  grayling  in  Yorkshire  is  that  of  John  Aubrey  in  The 
Natural  History  of  Wiltshire  (1660):  “ ...  it  hath  in  it  a rare  fish  called  the  Umber  . . . This 
kind  of  fish  is  in  no  other  river  in  England  except  the  river  Humber  in  Yorkshire”.  The  next 
record  for  Yorkshire  rivers  seems  to  be  that  of  Dr  Richard  Brooks  (1740):  “They  delight  in 
rivers  that  run  through  mountainous  places  and  one  to  be  met  with  in  the  clearest  and 
swiftest  parts  of  those  streams,  particularly  they  are  bred  in  the  Hodder,  Dove,  Trent, 
Derwent,  Humber,  Wye  and  the  Lug”.  [The  Hodder  and  the  Humber  are  Yorkshire  rivers, 
although  the  tidal  Humber  is  an  unlikely  habitat.]  The  book  ran  to  fourteen  editions,  the  last 
being  in  1811;  many  authors  of  angling  books  quoted  the  same  distribution  almost  verbatim. 

According  to  The  Sportsman  s Dictionary  (Anon.  1792),  “The  Grayling  is  found  in 
plenty  in  many  rivers  in  the  North,  particularly  in  the  Humber  and  in  the  Wye  which  runs 
through  Herefordshire  and  Monmouthshire  into  the  Severn”.  Whittaker  (1818)  mentions  in 
passing,  “the  beautiful  river  Hodder,  famous  for  its  Umber  . . . rising  near  the  Cross  of 
Crete”.  Sir  Humphry  Davy  (1828),  the  scientist  and  much  travelled  angler,  wrote:  “the 
grayling  is  a rare  fish  in  England  and  has  never  been  found  in  Scotland  or  Ireland,  I know  it 
no  further  west  than  the  Avon  in  Hampshire  ...  In  Derbyshire,  Staffordshire,  the  Dove,  the 
Wye,  the  Trent,  and  the  Blythe  afford  grayling;  in  Yorkshire,  on  the  north  coast,  some  of 
the  the  tributary  streams  of  the  Ribble;  and  in  the  south,  the  Ure,  the  Wharfe,  the  Humber, 
the  Derwent,  and  the  streams  that  form  it,  particularly  the  Rye”. 

John  Turton  (1836)  of  Sheffield  began  flyfishing  for  trout  on  the  head  waters  of  the  Don 
around  the  turn  of  the  century  but  wrote  that  there  were  no  grayling  there.  Since  he 
describes  in  detail  the  Derbyshire  and  Staffordshire  rivers  in  which  he  had  found  grayling 
plentiful,  it  seems  unlikely  that  they  were  present  anywhere  in  the  Don  at  that  time.  He 
does  mention  the  pollution  from  ‘manufactories’  which  even  at  that  date  was  becoming 
widespread  on  the  Don  and  the  grayling  is  very  susceptible  to  pollution  in  its  many  forms. 

Ronalds  (1836)  quotes  Sir  Humphry  Davy  in  full  but  acknowledges  the  author.  Other 
references  are: 

Yarrell  (1836):  “In  Yorkshire,  in  the  Derwent,  the  Ure,  the  Wharfe  and  the  Whiske  near 
Northallerton”. 

Shipley  and  Fitzgibbon  (1838):  “In  Staffordshire  in  the  Hodder  [the  Hodder  is  actually  a 
tributary  of  the  Yorkshire  Ribble]  ...  in  Lancashire  in  the  Ribble,  ...  in  Yorkshire  in  the 
Derwent,  the  Ure,  the  Wharfe,  and  the  Whiske  near  Northallerton”.  Pennell  (1895)  quotes 
the  above  almost  verbatim,  with  the  same  errors. 

Hofland  (1839)  refers  to  Harewood  on  the  Wharfe:  “Here  the  grayling  are  much  more 
abundant  than  at  Bolton.  [Bolton  Abbey,  further  upstream]  I have  seen  shoals  of  them 
swimming  near  the  the  sparlings  of  the  bridge  . . . during  my  residence  at  Harrowgate  this 
was  a favourite  resort  of  mine”. 

Denny  (1840):  “ Thymallus  vulgaris  Rather  local.  Harwood,  Bolton  [Bolton  Abbey] 
Wakefield”. 

Holland  (1843):  “The  following  fishes  may  be  found  in  the  Don  and  other  streams  in  our 


117 


A Review  of  the  Grayling  in  Yorkshire 

locality  . . . salmon  , trout  and  grayling  . . . 

Since  the  list  of  21  fishes  which  he  said  were  to  be  found  in  the  Sheffield  district 
includes  the  grayling,  ‘The  Sheffield  district’  may  well  have  included  certain  North 
Derbyshire  rivers  where  the  grayling  was  abundant.  Turton  (1836)  stated  that  for  30  years 
he  had  travelled  to  Derbyshire  for  the  fishing  but  he  would  hardly  have  done  so  if  the  local 
fishing  was  as  good  as  Holland  seems  to  indicate. 

Jackson  (1854):  “There  are  no  grayling  above  Aysgarth  . . . about  Clifton  trout  and 
grayling  abound  in  considerable  numbers  and  attain  a good  size  . . . The  Wharfe:  Grayling 
are  found  but  are  not  very  numerous  at  Grassington  ...  at  Collingham  the  grayling  are  very 
numerous  and  predominate  over  the  trout  . . . The  Rye:  At  Rievaulx  the  grayling  fishing 
may  be  said  to  commence;  the  grayling  are  numerous  and  predominate  over  the  trout”. 

Clarke  and  Roebuck  (1881):  “[Grayling]  Freshwater  resident,  found  in  varying 
abundance  in  the  middle  waters  of  the  Wharfe,  Washburn,  Nidd,  Ure  and  Swale,  also  in  the 
Cover,  Whiske  and  Codbeck,  the  Rye  and  other  tributaries  of  the  upper  Derwent  and  in  the 
Scalby  Beck  near  Scarborough.  In  the  Tees  it  is  very  limited  in  numbers  and  it  has  been 
introduced  into  the  Esk.  Formerly  abundant  in  the  Ribble  and  Hodder,  their  extreme 
scarcity  - if  not  extinction  - being  ascribed  to  the  great  increase  in  the  salmon.  It  was  also 
formerly  abundant  in  the  Aire  about  Bingley  but  in  1824  all  were  destroyed  due  to  the 
bursting  of  a bog,  subsequent  attempts  at  re-introduction  have  as  as  yet  proved  ineffective”. 

Pennell  (1895),  recommending  streams  where  the  grayling  might  be  successfully 
introduced,  states  (surprisingly  for  a stream  noted  for  its  large  grayling),  “Driffield  Beck 
below  Wandsford  Mill  seems  exactly  fitted  to  carry  grayling  side  by  side  with  trout”. 

Pritt  (1886):  “Kilnsey  [Upper  Wharfe]  water  holds  no  grayling”. 

Pritt  (1888):  . . the  grayling  was  formerly  plentiful  in  the  middle  reaches  of  the  Ribble, 

about  the  Cistercian  foundations  of  Sawley  and  Whalley.  Of  late  years  the  fish  had 
practically  disappeared  from  this  river  but  careful  nurturing  and  preservation  between 
Sawley  and  Gisbum  have  proved  that  the  grayling  will  survive  there  as  it  did  in  ancient 
days  ...  It  is  to  be  noticed  that  the  grayling  rivers  of  Yorkshire,  some  ten  or  eleven  in  all, 
join  their  broad  waters  in  the  Humber  . . . The  best  grayling  river  of  Yorkshire  is  the 
Costa”.  [It  joins  the  Rye  at  Howe  Bridge,  north  of  Malton.] 

Pritt  (1888):  “There  are  many  fine  streams  on  the  Western  side  of  the  country  in  which 
it  would  prosper  if  it  were  properly  introduced,  ...  as  indeed  it  would  in  the  Hodder,  the 
Lune  . . .”. 

Walbran  (1895):  “The  river  Wharfe  from  Otley  down  to  Harewood  used  to  abound  with 
grayling,  but  during  recent  years  they  have  greatly  decreased  in  numbers.  Some  30  years 
ago  (1865)  one  angler  killed  75  grayling  in  a single  day  with  fly  only  . . . The  sole  reason 
for  the  decline  may  be  found  at  Ilkley  and  Otley  where  all  the  town’s  sewage  has  hitherto 
been  turned  direct  into  the  river  . . . There  is  also  a large  paper  mill  which  has  polluted  the 
stream”.  [The  Otley  Angling  Club  was  the  first  to  successfully  prosecute  a local  council  for 
pollution  in  1897  but  merely  achieved  bankruptcy]  “In  Yorkshire,  the  Wharfe,  the  Yore, 
the  Swale,  the  Derwent,  the  Costa  and  the  Rye  all  abound  with  fine  grayling”. 

Minute  Book,  Appletreewick,  Barden  and  Bumsall  Angling  Club  (1889),  referring  to  the 
Wharfe:  “There  is  a vast  increase  in  the  number  of  small  grayling  which  is  not  looked  upon 
as  at  all  satisfactory  and  that  grayling  have  increased  inordinately  at  the  expense  of  the 
trout”. 

ABBAC  Minute  Book  (1906):  “1671  grayling  were  netted  out  and  distributed  to  the 
landlords  and  the  tenants”. 

ABBAC  Minute  Book  (1928):  J.  Bazeley  complained  of  excessive  numbers  of  grayling 
in  the  upper  Wharfe,  giving  instances  of  80  per  day  caught  by  individual  anglers  on  rod  and 
line. 

Yorkshire  Post  (1929):  “Stocks  of  grayling  on  the  upper  Wharfe  now  very  low”. 

ABBAC  Minute  Book  (1932):  “It  was  decided  that  grayling  should  be  netted  out”. 

ABBAC  Minute  Book  (1968):  “Disease  was  reported  in  the  Aire  and  the  Ure”.  [This 
proved  catastrophic  for  grayling  stocks  on  both  these  rivers  as  well  as  the  Wharfe,  and  it 


118 


A Review  of  the  Grayling  in  Yorkshire 

was  to  be  several  years  before  there  was  a noticeable  recovery,  achieved  mainly  by 
restocking  with  fish  from  the  East  Riding  and  restrictions  on  culling]. 

Briggs  (1991  Pers.  comm.):  “Very  rare  in  the  Wharfe  between  Otley  and  Harewood 
1940-1965”. 

Grayling  Introductions 

Davy  (1828)  gives  the  first  record  of  grayling  being  introduced  into  a river  where  they 
were  not  previously  known:  “The  grayling  were  recently  [1816]  introduced  into  the  Test”. 
They  flourished  in  this  famous  chalk  stream  and  some  50  years  later  fish  between  two  and 
three  pounds  were  commonplace. 

Turton  (1836)  gives  the  first  note  of  grayling  being  introduced  into  ponds  [in  Darley 
Dale  ]:  “We  angled  in  three  preserved  dams,  into  one  of  which  the  owner  had  put  many 
fine  greyling  [sic] , - he  being  a young  fly  fisher  himself.  It  was  the  only  dam  in  which  I 
ever  saw  them”. 

There  are  various  contemporary  accounts  of  the  first  grayling  introductions  into  Scottish 
rivers.  The  following  is  from  Hutchinson  (1904):  “In  1855,  36  yearling  grayling  were  sent 
by  mail  train  from  the  Derbyshire  Wye  to  Abingdon  on  the  Clyde”. 

“In  1857,  The  West  of  Scotland  Angling  Club  obtained  10,000  grayling  ova  from  the 
Derwent  near  Bakewell.  The  spawn  was  taken  on  13th  April  1857  and  sent  off  the  same 
night  in  common  wine  bottles  half  filled  with  water  to  Abingdon  on  the  Clyde,  about  50 
miles  above  Glasgow,  where  the  club  had  prepared  a rill  for  its  reception  ...  It  is  a matter 
of  history  that  this  simple  method  of  transporting  grayling  ova  stocked  the  Clyde  with  the 
fish”.  Grayling  fingerlings  from  the  above  experiment  were  transfered  to  the  river  Nith  in 
1858.  From  this  period  onwards,  the  transfer  of  grayling  from  one  river  to  another  and  to 
higher  reaches  of  the  same  river,  where  there  were  obstacles  to  upstream  migration, 
became  a regular  occurrence.  Not  all  transfers  were  successful;  grayling  transferred  from 
the  Costa  Beck  to  the  Yorkshire  Esk  in  1880  failed  to  survive.  Transfers  to  the  upper  Aire 
failed  also,  although  they  are  now  established  in  the  main  river  in  the  Skipton  area. 

Pritt  (1888):  “.  . . half  a dozen  grayling  introduced  into  the  Aire  at  Keighley  12  years 
ago,  have  been  sufficient  to  populate  miles  of  good  grayling  water  above  the  point  at  which 
they  were  turned  in.  Previous  to  the  introduction  of  these  fish,  grayling  had  become  extinct 
in  the  upper  reaches  of  the  Aire”. 

No  evidence  of  transfer  of  grayling  into  Yorkshire  from  outside  the  county  has  been 
found  to  date;  this  is  not  surprising  since  grayling  were  to  be  had  for  the  asking  in  a county 
where  the  fish  was  numerous  and  was  considered  vermin  by  many  proprietors  of  trout 
streams.  Large  numbers  of  mature  fish  were  transferred  from  East  Yorkshire  to  the 
tributaries  of  the  Ouse,  mainly  to  replace  stocks  which  had  been  wiped  out  by  pollution. 
However,  since  the  pollution  was  on-going,  many  of  the  introductions  had  to  be  regularly 
repeated.  The  dates  of  the  transfers,  numbers  of  fish,  sizes,  origin  and  the  receiving  river 
have  survived  in  many  instances  and  a list  is  given  below,  although  it  is  not  claimed  to  be 
complete  by  any  means. 


DATE 

SOURCE 

NUMBER 

RECEIVING  RIVER 

1876 

Wharfe 

6 

Aire  (above  Keighley) 

1931 

Costa  Beck 

31 

Wharfe  (Kirby) 
[Tagged  fish] 

November  1936 

Golden  Hill 
Driffield 

1170 

Wharfe;  Swale 

Driffield 

200 

Nidd 

1936 

West  Beck 

200 

Wharfe  (Ulleskelf) 

West  Beck 

300 

Wharfe  (Pool  Bridge) 

West  Beck 

250 

Riffa  Beck  (Wharfe) 

A Review  of  the  Grayling  in  Yorkshire  1 19 


1937 

West  Beck 

800 

Wharfe  (Pool),  Riffa  Beck 

1937 

West  Beck 

800 

Wharfe  (Kirby  Wharfe) 

Aug/Sept  1937 

Ure  at  Wensley  and 
Middleham 

400 

Nidd  and  Swale 

Oct  1937 

Wharfe  (Bumsall) 
[4oz  to  lOoz] 

500 

Lower  Wharfe 

Oct  /Nov  1937 

Driffield  Beck 

2400 

Leeds  ASA  waters  on 

1939 

West  Beck 

Part  of  1500 

Nidd  and  Wharfe. 
(50%  over  one  pound) 
Wharfe 

1940 

West  Beck 

Part  of  1600 

Wharfe 

1942 

West  Beck 

Part  of  1200 

Wharfe 

1943 

West  Beck 

Part  of  1000 

Wharfe  (Pool) 

1945 

West  Beck 

800 

Wharfe  (Boston  Spa 

1948 

West  Beck 

400 

and  Wetherby) 
Wharfe  (Boston  Spa) 

1950 

Aire  (Broughton) 

? 

Wharfe 

1956 

Ure  (Norton) 

85 

Wharfe 

1958 

Unknown 

72 

Wharfe  (Harewood) 

c.1960 

Costa  Beck 

100 

Aire  (Keighley) 

1961 

Unknown 

123 

Wharfe  (Harewood) 

1962 

Unknown 

200 

Wharfe  (Harewood) 

1963 

Unknown 

250 

Wharfe  (Harewood) 

1965 

Unknown 

60 

Wharfe  (Harewood) 

(In  1966  the  Leeds  Anglers’  Association  felt  that  at  long  last  the  grayling  had  been  re- 
established in  the  Wharfe  at  Harewood  and  decided  that  members  could  take  two  brace  per 
day  from  the  river  between  Oct  1 and  Jan  31  if  they  so  wished.  However  in  1968  ‘fungus’ 
disease  wiped  out  the  majority  of  grayling  in  the  Wharfe  from  Burley  to  Boston  Spa  and 
re-stocking  commenced  in  1971.) 


1971 

Unknown 

190 

Wharfe  (Harewood) 
‘Large  fish’ 

1990 

Reared  from  Nidd 
ova  by  NRA. 

100 

Wharfe  (Arthington) 

Factors  which  have  affected  the  Grayling  populations 
Pollution 

The  ‘grayling  zones’  of  several  Yorkshire  rivers,  particularly  the  Tees,  Aire,  Wharfe,  Nidd 
and  Swale,  have  suffered  from  pollution  from  lead  mining  for  several  centuries  and  the 
destruction  of  the  grayling  as  a result  is  well  documented.  The  situation  worsened  in 
Yorkshire  from  the  beginning  of  the  Industrial  Revolution  when  noxious  discharges  came 
from  woollen  mills,  dyeing,  tanning,  mining  and  paper  mills.  In  addition,  until  late  into  the 
20th  century  raw  sewage  was  discharged  directly  into  the  rivers. 

Drainage 

Many  small  tributaries  were  turned  into  canals  by  continuous  dredging;  the  Costa  Beck, 


120 


A Review  of  the  Grayling  in  Yorkshire 


once  claimed  to  be  Yorkshire’s  finest  grayling  river,  was  permanently  affected  by  drainage 
operations. 

Close  Season 

The  brown  trout  has  a close  season  lasting  for  six  months,  whereas  the  grayling  close 
season  lasts  only  from  March  to  mid-June  since  it  is  classed  as  a coarse  fish.  This  would 
not  be  so  important  except  for  the  fact  that  grayling  are  killed  for  food  and  only  the  larger 
fish  are  taken.  It  has  been  argued  that  this  results  in  greater  numbers  of  small  fish  but  this 
has  not  been  substantiated  in  Yorkshire. 


Owners  and  lessees  of  trout  fisheries  have  until  recent  years  encouraged  the  removal  of 
grayling  in  the  interests  of  trout.  Formerly  netting  was  widely  employed  but  more  recently 
electro-fishing  has  been  used.  Stock  removed  were  given  away  as  food,  merely  disposed 
of,  or  transferred  to  other  rivers  when  there  was  a demand.  Some  fisheries  had  rules  that  all 
grayling  caught  by  rod  and  line  should  be  killed  and  encouragement  was  given  to  anglers  to 
capture  the  maximum  number  possible  during  the  close  season  for  trout.  Mottram  (1928), 
writing  of  trout  fisheries,  says,  “As  regards  grayling,  if  as  usual,  they  are  looked  upon  as 
vermin,  then  the  rules  should  be  that  every  grayling  caught  should  be  killed”. 

Impounding  and  Water  Extraction 

The  tendency  to  augment  water  supplies  by  river  transfer,  in  conjunction  with  extraction  by 
pumping  from  downstream,  is  increasing  and  has  changed  the  character  of  some  grayling 
zones.  As  a result,  the  grayling  stocks  have  become  almost  extinct  on  the  upper  Wharfe. 
Insufficient  research  has  been  done  to  determine  the  reasons  but  it  is  well  known  that 
mature  and  immature  fish  of  all  species  as  well  as  invertebrates  are  drawn  into  the  pumps 
and  destroyed.  No  successful  method  of  preventing  this  has  been  found  to  date  and  the 
effect  of  extraction  by  pumping  has  been  little  studied. 

Flora  and  Fauna  of  Grayling  Zones 

There  has  been  a great  reduction  in  the  distribution  of  aquatic  plants  in  some  Yorkshire 
rivers  during  the  post-war  years,  with  a consequent  reduction  in  the  numbers  of  aquatic 
invertebrates.  The  density  of  grayling  per  hectare  in  the  grayling  zones  appears  to  be 
directly  related  to  the  presence  of  aquatic  plants  (Magee  1992). 


There  is  little  evidence  that  disease  has  had  a serious  effect  on  grayling  stocks  in  Yorkshire 
with  the  exception  of  the  outbreak  of  fungal  disease  in  1967.  This  outbreak  reduced  stocks 
on  the  River  Wharfe  and  some  tributaries  to  very  small  numbers  and  upstream  of 
Addingham  they  have  never  recovered.  The  existing  populations  are  healthy  and  spawning 
does  take  place  but  the  stocks  are  very  low.  Following  the  outbreak  no  attempts  were  made 
to  re-introduce  grayling  of  breeding  age  into  the  Upper  Wharfe  as  was  done  on  the  mid- 
Wharfe. 

Yorkshire  Grayling  Rivers 

Main  River  Tributary 


Culling 


Disease 


Tees 

Esk 

Ribble 


Not  common 


- Hodder 


Wharfe 


Virtually  extinct  upstream  of  Buckden 
A sparse  population 
At  confluence  with  main  river 
At  confluence  with  main  river 


- Skirfare 
-Dibb 

- Washburn 


121 


A Review  of  the  Grayling  in  Yorkshire 


Aire 

Upstream  of  Keighley 

Derwent 

- Rye 

- Seven 
-Dove 

- Costa  Beck 

- Pickering  Beck 

- Thornton  Beck 

- Ricall 

Upper  reaches 

Swale 

- Cod  Beck 

- Whiske 

- Bedale  Beck 

Upper  reaches 

Ure 

- Cover 

- Skell 

- Laver 

As  far  down  stream  as  Ripon 

Don 

Introduced  into  upper  reaches 

Hull 

Nidd 

- Driffield  canal 

- Driffield  Beck 

- Gouthwaite  Reservoir 

The  stocks  appear  to  be  most  vulnerable  and  variable  in  the  tributaries,  where  the  effects  of 
an  occasional  chemical,  farm,  or  sewage  pollution  can  be  severe.  This  is  particularly  so 
during  low  summer  levels  or  during  a period  of  drought. 

Conclusion 

Axford  (1991)  stated  at  a seminar  on  ‘Yorkshire  Grayling’,  “The  rarity  of  the  grayling 
seems  to  be  a natural  characteristic,  probably  related  to  habitat  restrictions  and  the  grayling 
are  naturally  succeeded  by  trout  in  the  upper  reaches.  The  environmental  requirements  of 
the  grayling  which  cause  this  restriction  are  not  known’’.  He  went  on  to  enumerate  some  of 
the  possible  factors. 

At  the  same  seminar  Crisp  said,  “The  general  message  which  we  get  from  the  scientific 
literature  is  that  when  the  environment  of  the  grayling  deteriorates,  the  juveniles  and  young 
die  and  the  adults  move  away  to  more  favourable  living  conditions  (Jankovic  1964)”. 

The  author  has  closely  observed  the  fluctuations  of  the  grayling  stocks  on  the  Wharfe 
(and  to  a lesser  extent  on  some  other  rivers)  since  1968.  Since  1984  angling  interests  and 
the  National  Rivers  Authority  have  been  collecting  data  which  it  is  hoped  will  give  a better 
understanding  of  the  ecological  requirements  of  the  grayling  and  enable  steps  to  be  taken 
which  will  preserve  this  truly  wild  fish  as  a denizen  of  Yorkshire  rivers. 

Acknowledgements 

The  author  acknowledges  the  assistance  of  Mr  C.  A.  Howes  for  his  encouragement,  advice 
and  the  provision  of  certain  obscure  references  previously  unknown  to  him  and  Mr  H. 
Briggs,  Dr  S.  Axford  (National  Rivers  Authority)  and  Dr  Ross  Gardiner  (The  Grayling 
Society)  for  suggestions  and  comments  on  the  manuscript. 

References 

Anon.  ( 1792  ) The  Sportsman  s Dictionary.  London. 

Appletreewick,  Barden  & Bumsall  Angling  Club,  Minute  Books  (1889-1968). 

Aubrey,  J.  (1660)  The  Natural  History  of  Wiltshire.  Davy,  London. 

Axford,  S.  (1991)  River  Wharfe  Grayling.  Seminar,  ‘Yorkshire  Grayling’,  River  Wharfe 
Anglers’  Association,  Bolton  Abbey. 


122 


Book  Review 


Bazeley,  J.  (1928)  Letter  to  Bumsall  Angling  Club.  ABB  AC  Minute  Book. 

Berners,  J.  (1496)  A Treaty se  ofFysshing  wyth  an  Angle.  Wynkin  de  Word,  Westminster. 
Brooks,  R.  (1740)  The  Art  of  Angling.  Lowndes,  London. 

Clarke,  W.  E.  and  Roebuck,  W.  D.  (1881)  A Handbook  Of  the  Vertebrate  Fauna  of 
Yorkshire.  Lovell  Reeve,  London. 

Crisp,  T.  (1991)  Grayling.  Seminar  ‘Yorkshire  Grayling’,  River  Wharfe  Anglers’ 
Association,  Bolton  Abbey, 

Davy,  Sir  Humphry  (1828)  Salmonalia,  or  Days  and  Nights  of  Fly-fishing.  White,  London. 
Denny,  J.  (1840)  Sketch  of  the  natural  history  of  Leeds  and  its  vicinity  for  twenty  miles. 
Ann.  Mag.  Nat.  History  5:  382-396. 

Hofland,  T.  C.(1839)  The  British  Angler  s Manual.  Whitehead,  London. 

Holland,  J.  (1843)  The  Vital  Statistics  of  Sheffield.  Tyas,  London. 

Hutchinson,  H.  G,  ed.  (1904)  Fishing.  Country  Life  Library  of  Sport,  Vol.l:  496-499. 
Newnes,  London. 

Jackson,  J.  (1854)  The  Practical  Fly-Fisher.  Farlow,  London  & Leeds. 

Jankovic,  D.  (1964)  Synopsis  of  Biological  Data  of  the  European  Grayling  ( Thymallus 
thymallus),  FAO  Fisheries  Synopsis  24. 

Jones,  A.  K.  G.  (1988)  Provisional  remarks  on  fish  remains  from  archaeological  deposits  at 
York.  In:  The  Exploitation  of  Wetlands.  (P.  Murphy  and  C.  French,  eds).  Symposia  for 
the  Association  of  Environmental  Archaeology  No.  7.  British  Archaeological  Reports, 
British  Series  186:  1 13-127. 

Magee,  L.  (1992)  The  grayling:  an  endangered  species.  Bulletin  Yorkshire  Naturalists’ 
Union  17:  1-3. 

Magee,  L.  (1992)  The  Caddis  Fly  Brachycentrus  subnubilus.  Bulletin  Yorkshire 
Naturalists’  Union  17:  10-11. 

Mottram,  J.  C.  (1928)  Trout  Fisheries:  their  care  and  preservation.  Jenkins,  London. 
Pennell,  H.  C.  (1889)  Fishing  - Salmon  and  Trout.  Longmans,  London. 

Platts,  W.  C.  (1939)  Grayling  Fishing.  Adam  & Charles  Black,  London. 

Pritt,  T.  E.  (1886)  North-Country  Flies.  Sampson  Low,  London. 

Pritt,  T.  E.  (1888)  The  Book  Of  the  Grayling.  Goodall  and  Suddick,  Leeds. 

Rhygini,  R.  (1968)  Grayling.  Macdonald,  London 

Ronalds,  A.  (1836)  The  Fly-fisher’s  Entomology.  10th  edition,  Longmans,  London. 

Shipley,  W.  & FitzGibbon,  E.  (1838)  A True  Treatise  on  the  Art  of  Fly  Fishing , London. 
Taylor,  S (1800)  Angling  in  All  Its  Branches.  Longmans,  London. 

Turton,  J.  (1836)  The  Angler’ s Manual.  Groombridge,  London. 

Walbran,  F.  M.  (1895)  Grayling  and  How  to  Catch  Them.  The  Angler  Co,  Scarborough. 
Walton,  I.  (1653)  The  Compleat  Angler.  (2nd  edition  1655)  Marriot,  London. 

Whitaker,  T.  D.  (1806)  History  ofWhalley.  2nd  edition,  Nicholls  & Son,  London. 

Yarrell,  W.  (1836)  A History  of  British  Fishes.  Van  Voorst,  London. 

BOOK  REVIEW 

A Field  Guide  to  the  Shallow-water  Echinoderms  of  the  British  Isles  by  Bernard  E. 
Pickton.  Pp.  96  + 66  full  colour  illustrations.  Marine  Conservation  Society.  Immel 
Publishing,  London,  £15.95  paperback. 

The  information  contained  in  this  Marine  Conservation  Society  account  of  the  sea  lilies, 
starfish,  brittle  stars,  sea  urchins  and  sea  cucumbers  is  remarkable.  Species  descriptions  are 
accompanied  in  all  cases  by  colour  photographs  taken  from  life,  the  quality  of  which  reflect 
the  author’s  international  reputation  as  an  underwater  photographer.  Whilst  aimed  at  those 
who  dive  our  coastal  waters,  most  of  the  species  can  be  found  between  tides  in  rock  pools 
and  the  like.  A book  which  all  who  have  an  interest  in  marine  life  should  have  on  their 
bookshelf.  Taking  into  consideration  the  quality  of  the  illustrations,  it  is  not  overpriced. 

DTR 


123 

VEGETATION  CHANGES  ON  ILKLEY  MOOR  BETWEEN 
1964  AND  1984,  AND  POSSIBLE  ENVIRONMENTAL  CAUSES 

W.  H.  G.  HALE  and  D.  E.  COTTON 

Department  of  Environmental  Science,  The  University,  Bradford  BD7  1DP 
Introduction 

In  recent  years  there  has  been  concern  about  the  decrease  in  the  quality  and  quantity  of 
Britain’s  heaths  and  moorlands.  This  concern  has  prompted  attempts  to  monitor  change  in 
moorland  vegetation,  and  programmes  of  action  designed  to  halt  the  decline,  both 
nationally  and  locally  (Bunce,  1989;  Hudson  & Newborn,  1989a). 

In  northern  England  the  decline  has  been  brought  about  partly  by  a reduction  in  the  areal 
extent  of  the  moors  but  mainly  by  changes  in  their  species  composition,  with  Calluna 
vulgaris  (L.)  Hull  (heather)  declining  and  grasses,  Empetrum  nigrum  L.  (crowberry)  and 
other  species  increasing.  These  changes  have  been  attributed  to  changed  management 
practices,  such  as  less  effective  burning  regimes  and  increased  sheep  grazing  (Bunce, 
1989).  However,  there  are  few  detailed  quantitative  studies  of  long-term  vegetation  change. 
This  paper  draws  upon  historical  records  to  determine  the  nature  and  extent  of  change  in 
the  vegetation  of  Ilkley  Moor  over  a twenty-year  interval. 


4 08 


16 


448 


Key 


Study  Area 

□ Sample  Areas  (a  - d) 

Transect  Lines  (1  and  2) 

Pr  Panorama  Reservoir 

Rr  Reva  Reservoir 

Wr  Weecher  Reservoir 

W Whetstone  Gate 

H Hawks  worth  Moor 

Contours  (metres) 

4|j|||j|  Urban  Areas 


441 


Location  map  showing  the  positions  of  the  transect  lines  ( 1 and  2)  and  sample  areas 
(a-d)  mentioned  in  the  text.  The  numbers  on  the  edges  relate  to  the  National  Grid. 


Naturalist  118  (1993) 


124 


Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  over  20  years 

In  1974  when  Bradford  Metropolitan  District  Council  acquired  responsibility  for  the 
management  of  the  common  land  on  Ilkley  Moor,  there  was  general  disquiet  about  the  state 
of  the  moor.  Based  on  a vegetation  survey  undertaken  in  1964,  it  was  contended  that 
Pteridium  aquilinum  (L.)  Kuhn  (bracken)  and  Empetrum  were  rapidly  spreading  and  that 
Calluna  was  in  decline  (Fidler  et  al. , 1970).  Because  of  this  concern,  a new  vegetation 
survey  was  made  of  the  area  in  1984  to  provide  more  recent  information  about  the  plant 
communities  on  the  moor,  and  to  enable  comparisons  to  be  made  with  the  earlier  survey. 
This  paper  analyses  the  changes  which  have  occurred  on  the  moor  in  the  period  1964-1984 
and  evaluates  possible  causes  of  the  observed  change  such  as  variation  in  sheep  numbers 
and  climatic  trends. 

Physical  Background 

Ilkley  Moor  and  the  integral  contiguous  area  of  Hawks  worth  Moor  occupy  about  10km2  of 
the  upland  area  which  separates  the  rivers  Wharfe  and  Aire  (Fig.  1).  The  underlying 
geology  consists  of  an  alternating  sequence  of  coarse  sandstones  and  shales  of 
Carboniferous  age  (Lamming,  1969)  which  dip  gently  towards  the  south  (Fig.  2).  Coarse 
sandstones  cap  much  of  the  gently  undulating  upper  portion  of  the  area,  which  attains  a 
maximum  height  of  402m  close  to  the  moor’s  southern  boundary.  Shales  are  more 
abundant  in  the  northern,  lower  portion  of  the  moor  where  the  land  slopes  steeply  into  the 
valley  of  the  river  Wharfe.  The  lowest  portion  of  the  moor  has  an  elevation  of  160m. 

During  the  Devensian  glaciation  the  area  was  scoured  by  ice  which  moved  down  the 
Wharfe  valley.  The  beds  of  shale  were  preferentially  eroded,  steepening  the  lower,  northern 
slopes  of  the  moor.  On  the  moor’s  northern  flank,  landslipping  has  occurred  due  to  glacial 
oversteepening.  In  the  mid  and  upper  portions  of  the  moor,  glacial  erosion  produced  a 
number  of  small  sandstone  scarps.  Sandstone  beds  also  underlie  the  ill-drained  almost 
horizontal  areas  which  make  up  large  tracts  of  the  moor.  Glacial  debris,  in  the  form  of  a 
calcareous  lateral  moraine,  forms  a small  but  notable  feature  in  the  eastern  section  of  the 
moor  (Fig.  2a),  but  apart  from  this  little  glacial  debris  is  in  evidence  though  deep 
solifluction  debris  is  present  on  many  slopes.  Over  the  sandstone  beds  the  soils  are 
generally  thin  and  stony  with  a pH  of  3.0  to  5.5.  Near  the  crests  of  the  sandstone  scarps 
drainage  is  good,  but  waterlogged  soils  and  thin  peat  deposits  occupy  much  of  the  flatter 
dipslope  areas.  These  thin  peats  are  underlain  by  a mineral  soil  typically  comprising 
mostly  coarse  and  fine  sands  (44%  and  53%  by  weight  respectively)  with  a small 
quantity  of  silt  and  clay  materials  (1%  and  2%  respectively). 

Though  meteorological  data  are  not  available  for  the  moor  itself,  data  drawn  from 
stations  within  9 km  indicate  that  the  area  has  a seasonally  well-distributed  annual 
precipitation  of  800  to  900  mm.  Mean  winter  temperatures  on  the  moor  average  about  2°C 
and  mean  summer  temperatures  13°C.  Only  during  the  three  summer  months  will  frosts 
usually  be  completely  absent. 

Vegetation  Records 

In  1903  William  Smith  published  a map  of  Ilkley  Moor  as  part  of  his  1:126,720  scale 
vegetation  map  of  Yorkshire  (Smith  & Moss,  1903).  On  this  map  the  upper  moor  is 
depicted  as  ‘heather  moor  ( Calluna  dominant)’,  with  the  scarps  supporting  Vaccinium 
myrtillus  L.  (bilberry);  Empetrum  is  also  mentioned  as  being  present.  By  1960,  however, 
Calluna  cover  had  apparently  declined  and  vegetation  changes  were  attracting  the  attention 
of  the  local  naturalists.  A map  of  the  vegetation  produced  in  1964  by  the  Wharfedale 
Naturalists,  and  papers  published  at  that  time,  highlight  the  spread  of  Empetrum  on  the 
upper  moor  and  Pteridium  in  the  lower  areas  (Dalby,  1961;  Dalby  et  al.,  1970;  Fidler  et  al., 
1970).  They  suggested  that  these  changes  arose  either  from  excessive  grazing  by  sheep  or 
from  the  moor  drying  out  following  the  excavation  of  shallow  ditches  which  were  intended 
to  improve  the  drainage. 

Since  the  1960s  the  vegetation  of  the  moor  has  continued  to  change  (Cotton  & Hale, 
1989).  This  paper  quantifies  some  of  the  changes  and  discusses  possible  causes  for  the 


FIGURE  2 

Composite  cross  sectional  transects  of  Ilkley  Moor  showing  topography,  generalised  geology  and  vegetation  communities  as  mapped  in 
1964  and  1984.  The  letters  within  each  community  type  give  an  approximate  indication  of  the  relative  abundance  of  the  species  present. 

The  locations  of  the  transects  are  given  in  the  text  and  in  Figure  1 . 


1 26  Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  over  20  years 

changes  between  1964  and  the  period  1983-1984,  when  the  moor’s  vegetation  was 
resurveyed. 

Data  Collection  and  Methods  of  Analysis 

The  1984  map  was  produced  at  a scale  of  1:500  to  match  the  1964  map,  a copy  of  which 
had  been  obtained  from  the  Wharfedale  Naturalists.  Details  of  the  recording  procedure  in 
1984  are  given  in  Cotton  and  Hale  (1989),  but  in  summary  involved  the  following.  Ten 
community  categories  were  used.  Six  of  them  were  based  on  the  relative  proportions  of  the 
Ericales  species  ( Calluna , Empetrum  and  Vaccinium ) where  these  occupied  between  them 
over  50%  of  the  vegetation  cover.  The  four  remaining  categories  related  to  dominance  by 
Pteridium,  Eriophorum  species  (E.  angustifolium  Honck.  and  E.  vaginatum  L.)  and  grass 
and  J uncus  species  (particularly  J.  effusus  L.).  Percentage  cover  of  a species  was  not 
recorded  directly,  but  since  the  categories  were  decided  using  relative  abundance  of  species 
the  approximate  cover  value  of  the  key  species  in  each  category  was  known.  With  the  1964 
map  categories,  based  largely  on  dominance  of  key  species,  assumptions  had  to  be  made 
about  the  percentage  cover  values  for  each  category.  For  example,  in  categories  where  two 
species  were  named,  it  was  assumed  that  the  first-named  was  dominant  with  a cover  of 
60%  and  the  second-named  was  subsidiary  with  40%  cover. 

Quantitative  data  were  extracted  from  both  the  1964  and  1984  maps  by  superimposing  a 
regular  rectangular  grid  with  a line  spacing  of  33.3m,  providing  almost  9,000  sample  points 
per  map.  This  gave  a sample  density  of  nine  points  per  hectare.  At  each  sample  point  the 
vegetation  community  recorded  on  the  map  was  noted.  The  frequency  of  these  community 
records  then  enabled  estimates  of  the  percentage  cover  of  the  moor  by  different  plant 
species  to  be  calculated  for  both  surveys,  as  indicated  above. 

Due  to  some  uncertainty  about  the  most  appropriate  percentage  cover  values  to  apply  to 
the  1964  map  categories,  it  was  decided  to  check  the  sensitivity  of  the  results  under 
different  assumptions.  Consequently,  the  vegetation  categories  on  the  1964  map  were 
assigned  to  the  closest  matching  category  from  the  1984  survey,  and  the  percentage  cover 
value  for  each  species  in  1964  was  then  calculated  in  accordance  with  the  procedures  used 
for  the  1984  results.  If  the  results  are  robust  with  respect  to  the  different  assumptions  used, 
this  would  give  greater  confidence  in  the  accuracy  of  the  results  estimated.  The  results 
presented  are  therefore  of  two  types:  (1)  the  percentage  of  the  moor  occupied  by  the  major 
species  from  the  1964  and  1984  surveys  as  originally  classified,  and  (2)  data  obtained  from 
the  1964  survey  as  reclassified. 

Composite  transects  showing  the  relationship  between  geology,  topography  and 
vegetation  in  1964  and  1984  were  constructed  using  the  1934  1:10,560  scale  geological 
maps  and  the  original  1:500  scale  vegetation  maps  (Fig.  2).  Both  are  North-South  profiles, 
located  as  shown  in  Fig.  1;  one  is  of  the  eastern  section  of  the  moor  and  runs  from  near  the 
Cow  and  Calf  rocks  (44/130469)  to  Hawksworth  Moor;  the  other  traverses  the  western 
portion  of  the  moor  from  Panorama  Reservoir  in  the  north  (44/101469)  to  Whetstone  Gate 
on  the  moor’s  southern  boundary. 

Spatial  change  in  small  areas  of  vegetation  was  also  evaluated  for  four  markedly 
different  moorland  environments.  The  locations  of  four  illustrative  areas  are  depicted  in 
Figure  1.  They  comprise  portions  of  the  upper  moorland  plateau;  the  upper  sandstone 
scarp;  the  poorly-drained  plateau  of  the  middle  moor;  and  the  steep  slopes  of  the  lower 
moor.  Maps  have  been  drawn  for  both  1964  and  1984  for  each  of  these  25x25m  tracts  of 
vegetation  (Fig.  3a-d  respectively),  so  that  the  frequency  of  the  species  symbols  creates  a 
visual  impression  of  the  relative  abundance  of  the  species  in  each  of  the  mapped 
communities.  Comparison  between  the  1964  and  1984  maps  therefore  gives  a direct 
impression  of  estimated  species  changes. 

Data  were  also  obtained  on  the  climatic  conditions  which  have  prevailed  over  the  period 
1964-1984  in  order  to  determine  if  there  were  any  trends  which  may  have  influenced 
vegetation  change.  Precipitation  data  were  obtained  for  Reva  and  Weecher  Reservoirs, 
which  lie  less  than  2.5  km  from  the  moor’s  southern  edge  (Fig.  1).  Further  information  on 


127 


Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  over  20  years 

precipitation,  bright  sunshine  and  temperatures  were  obtained  for  Lister  Park  in  Bradford, 
which  is  less  than  9 km  from  the  moor.  Data  from  these  three  sources  have  been  combined 
to  provide  a more  complete  picture  of  conditions  on  the  moor  than  would  be  given  by 
information  from  any  one  recording  station. 

Records  of  sheep  numbers  between  1950  and  1988  were  obtained  from  the  Ministry  of 
Agriculture,  Fisheries  and  Food  (MAFF)  annual  June  returns.  These  provide  details  of 
livestock  numbers  on  agricultural  holdings  within  all  the  parishes  which  together  constitute 
the  moor.  Records  of  sheep  numbers  actually  on  Ilkley  Moor  came  from  direct  counts 
made  between  1974  and  1978,  and  were  obtained  from  Bradford  Metropolitan  District 
Council. 

Results 

Table  1 provides  data  for  the  estimated  percentage  areas  of  the  moor  occupied  by  major 
plant  species.  The  reclassified  1964  data  show  very  little  difference  (<3%)  in  the  indicated 
species  abundances  from  the  data  obtained  with  the  original  categories  - compare  columns 
(b)  and  (c).  This  contrasts  with  the  marked  differences  between  the  1964  and  1984  data  - 
compare  columns  (b)  and  (a).  This  gives  confidence  that  the  differences  are  not  merely  an 
artefact  of  using  different  mapping  procedures  in  the  two  surveys. 

It  is  apparent  that  the  estimated  cover  value  for  Calluna  has  increased  appreciably  (from 
8.2%  to  25.9%)  whilst  those  for  Vaccinium  and  Pteridium  have  also  increased  but  by  a 
smaller  absolute  amount  (from  2.5%  to  8.4%  and  17.3%  to  22.5%  respectively).  However, 
in  percentage  terms  Vaccinium  has  increased  even  more  than  Calluna  (Table  1).  Empetrum 
and  Eriophorum  species  have  decreased  considerably  (by  an  estimated  13.4%  and  10.8% 
respectively).  Whilst  there  is  an  indication  that  Gramineae  and  Juncus  species  have  each 
decreased  slightly,  the  decrease  is  close  to  the  3%  variation  associated  with  the  community 
reclassification  and  therefore  should  be  interpreted  with  caution. 

Notable  tracts  (30ha  in  total)  of  the  whole  moor  were  recorded  as  bare  ground  or  burnt 
areas  in  1964,  probably  reflecting  a more  active  burning  regime  at  that  time.  By  1984  these 
had  been  colonised  by  vegetation,  and  no  bare  ground  or  burnt  areas  were  recorded.  For 
these  colonised  areas,  Empetrum  accounted  for  an  estimated  33%  of  the  new  cover,  Calluna 
for  28%  and  Vaccinium  for  16%;  the  remaining  species  each  had  10%  cover  or  less. 

TABLE  1 

Percentage  of  vegetation  cover  (excluding  bare  ground)  accounted  for 
by  species  and  higher  taxa  in  (a)  1984,  (c)  1964  and  (b)  1964  as  reclassified. 

Percentage  change  calculated  by  ((a)-(b)/(b))xl00. 


Species 

1984 

categories 

(a) 

1964  re- 
classified 
(b) 

1964 

categories 

(c) 

% 

change 

Calluna 

vulgaris 

25.9 

8.2 

7.2 

+216 

Pteridium 

aquilinum 

22.5 

17.3 

16.3 

+30 

Empetrum 

nigrum 

19.0 

32.4 

35.2 

-41 

Eriophorum 

spp. 

13.5 

24.3 

24.3 

-45 

Vaccinium 

myrtillus 

8.4 

2.5 

2.1 

+238 

Gramineae 

6.6 

10.1 

7.3 

-35 

Juncaceae 

4.1 

5.2 

7.8 

-21 

128 


Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  over  20  years 

Figures  2a  and  2b  illustrate  the  relationships  between  topography,  the  underlying 
geology  and  the  vegetation  communities.  Pteridium  is  associated  with  the  moor’s  lower 
scarps  and  Calluna  is  prevalent  on  the  level  tracts  of  the  eastern  portion  of  the  upper  moor. 
Over  the  twenty  year  period,  Calluna  has  increased  markedly  on  Hawksworth  Moor  and  on 
the  central  plateau.  In  contrast,  Eriophorum  species  are  now  abundant  only  on  the  western 


(a)  UPPER  MOOR 
G.R.  130440 
340m  AO.D. 


to)  UPPER  SCARP 
G.R.  093458 
390m  AO.D. 


(c)  MIDDLE  MOOR  PLATEAU 
G.R.  118458 
350m  AO.D. 


(d)  LOWER  MOOR 
G.R.  099467 
270m  AO.D. 


1964 


KEY 


p 

Pteridium  aquiiinum 

(Bracken) 

R 

Eriophorum  spp. 

(Cotton  grass) 

E 

Empetrum  nigrum 

(Crowberry) 

G 

Gramineae 

(Grasses) 

C 

Calluna  vulgaris 

(Heather) 

J 

Juncus  spp. 

(Rushes) 

V 

Vaocinium  myrtillus 

(Bilberry) 

0 25m 

Scale  I i i i i I 


FIGURE  3 

Vegetation  maps  of  selected  625m2  portions  of  Ilkley  Moor  in  1964  and  1984. 
The  lines  demarcate  the  mapped  vegetation  communities  and  the  letters 
schematically  depict  the  most  abundant  species  in  each  community 


Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  over  20  years 


129 


(a) 


Total  yearly  number  of  frost  days 
1964  - 1983 

(b) 

1500  _ 

Total  yearly  precipitation 
1964  - 1983 

160  _ 

* 

X 

150  _ 

1400  _ 

140  _ 

* 

E 

£ 

x 

130  _ 

8 1300  _ 

X 

120  _ 

X x 

O 

0. 

* X 

1 10 

X 

8 

* 

X X 

a 1200  _ 

* x 

100  _ 

X X * x X X 

I 

X 

90  _ 

x 

1100  _ 

* 

80  _ 

x 

70 

X | r 1 1— 

A'X  !OA7  1071  1071;  1070  lOQ^ 

1000 

1 1 r~ 1 m 

1971  1975 

years 


(c)  Total  yearly  hours  of  bright  sunshine 
1964  - 1983 

1200  

1100  _ * 
fc2  X 

I 1000  * XX* 

.8 

J 900  - * * 

D XX 

I 800  _ 

700  - x X 


1963  1967  1971  1975  1979  1983 

years 


FIGURE  4 

Variations  in  yearly  values  for  (a)  number 
of  frost  days,  (b)  precipitation  and 
(c)  bright  sunshine  over  the 
twenty-year  period  1964-1983. 
There  is  a significant  trend 
(p<0.05)  only  in  (a). 


section  of  the  central  plateau,  and  have  diminished  particularly  in  the  upper  portion  of  the 
eastern  moor.  Empetrum  has  also  declined  on  the  upper  moor,  but  the  relationship  with 
relief  is  less  clear.  Vaccinium  has  increased  on  the  upper  areas  of  the  moor,  particularly  in 
the  west.  Pteridium  has  not  extended  beyond  the  lower  portions  of  the  moor,  but  in  some 
areas  it  has  been  ousted  by  Calluna  and  Empetrum  whilst  elsewhere  it  has  expanded  at  the 
expense  of  the  Empetrum- grass  community.  Maps  showing  changes  in  the  spatial 
distribution  of  the  species  on  the  moor  are  given  in  Cotton  and  Hale  (1989). 

Comparison  of  the  vegetation  maps  of  different  portions  of  the  moor  in  1964  and  1984 
reveals  many  changes.  On  the  upper  moor  (Fig.  3a),  Calluna  has  become  much  more 
abundant,  having  spread  into  large  areas  that  were  formerly  dominated  by  Empetrum  and 
Eriophorum.  Empetrum  now  only  occurs  rarely  in  the  area.  On  the  upper  sandstone  scarp 
changes  are  equally  pronounced  (Fig.  3b).  Vaccinium  has  spread  along  the  crest  of  the 
scarp  and  in  1984  formed  a distinct  zone.  Calluna  too  has  become  more  abundant,  with 
both  species  occupying  areas  where  Eriophorum  and  Empetrum  were  formerly  abundant. 
On  the  poorly  drained  plateau  of  the  middle  moor  (Fig.  3c),  ericaceous  species  have  spread 
into  areas  formerly  occupied  by  Eriophorum.  Juncus  species  have  decreased  in  the  area. 
The  biggest  change  on  the  lower  moor  (Fig.  3d)  is  the  general  increase  in  the  abundance  of 
Pteridium.  However,  locally  Gramineae  and  Juncaceae  have  become  more  abundant  and 
Empetrum  has  declined  in  the  lowest  portions  of  the  area. 


130 


Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  over  20  years 

Analysis  of  the  climatic  data  for  the  twenty  year  period  revealed  marked  fluctuations  in 
most  of  the  climatic  elements,  but  statistically  significant  trends  were  confined  to  the 
incidence  of  ground  frost.  Though  there  were  no  significant  trends  in  overall  yearly 
temperatures,  the  incidence  of  both  spring  and  autumn  frosts  increased  significantly 
(p<0.05)  and  the  annual  incidence  of  frosts  also  showed  a significant  increase  (p<0.05;  Fig. 
4a).  Though  the  summer  of  1976  was  the  driest  since  records  began  in  1908,  the  overall 
annual  precipitation  showed  no  significant  trend  (Fig.  4b).  Sunshine  data  (Fig.  4c)  revealed 
no  apparent  trend  in  annual  totals  over  the  period,  even  though  the  implementation  of  the 
Clean  Air  Acts  might  have  been  expected  to  influence  this  parameter. 


1950  1955  I 960  1965  1970  1975  1980  1985  1' 

Years 


FIGURE  5 

Total  numbers  of  sheep  recorded  by 
MAFF  June  returns  for  all  the 
parishes  which  include  portions  of 
Ilkley  Moor.  The  heavy  line  depicts 
the  principal  study  period. 


The  records  of  sheep  numbers  in  the  moorland  parishes  indicate  that  sheep  numbers  in 
the  area  have  increased  dramatically  since  1950  (Fig.  5).  In  the  20  year  period  (1964-84) 
numbers  rose  from  26,102  to  48,758.  Counts  of  sheep  actually  on  the  moor  between  1974 
and  1978  revealed  that  numbers  varied  from  approximately  1200  to  1700,  suggesting  that 
about  5%  of  the  total  sheep  population  of  the  parishes  was  present  on  the  1000  hectares  of 
moorland. 

Discussion 

Stocking  Density  and  Effects  on  Vegetation 

The  stocking  density  revealed  by  sheep  counts  on  Ilkley  Moor  during  the  1970s  indicates 
that  at  that  time  there  were  between  1.2  and  1.7  sheep  per  hectare.  If  the  numbers  of  sheep 
actually  on  the  moor  is  a constant  proportion  of  sheep  numbers  in  the  moorland  parishes, 
then  grazing  pressure  doubled,  from  about  1 to  around  2 sheep  per  hectare,  over  the  period 
1955  to  1980.  Similar  shifts  in  stocking  density  have  been  associated  with  changes  in  the 
nature  of  moorland  vegetation  cover  at  many  sites  in  Britain  (Rawes,  1983;  Hobbs  & 


131 


Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  over  20  years 

Gimingham,  1987).  Hudson  and  Newborn  (1989a)  maintain  that,  as  a rough  guide,  a 
grazing  density  of  1 sheep  per  hectare  is  the  maximum  that  will  normally  allow  Calluna  to 
maintain  itself  in  the  vegetation;  while  the  Nature  Conservancy  Council  have  given 
predictions  for  heather  moorland  condition  at  different  stocking  densities  (Cranbrook, 
1991).  They  predict  that  heather  moorland  should  be  in  ‘good’  condition  (i.e.  >50%  heather 
cover)  when  stocked,  on  average,  at  <2  ewes  per  hectare;  in  ‘poor’  condition  (25-50% 
cover)  at  2-3  ewes  per  hectare;  ‘suppressed’  (<25%  cover)  at  3-4  ewes  per  hectare;  and 
absent  at  >4  ewes  per  hectare.  They  suggest  that  heather  moorland  would  be  likely  to 
disappear  in  the  longer  term  if  stocking  rates  persist  at  >2  ewes  per  hectare  . Ilkley  Moor 
therefore  had,  by  1984,  reached  a stocking  rate  at  which  some  deleterious  vegetation 
changes  might  be  expected  to  occur. 

Our  results  indicate  that  pronounced  vegetation  changes  have  occurred  on  Ilkley  Moor  in 
the  period  1964  to  1984.  However,  the  nature  of  these  changes  differs  from  the  response  to 
similar  increases  in  grazing  intensity  recorded  elsewhere.  When  sheep  are  present  at 
densities  of  over  1 per  hectare,  Calluna  decline  has  been  associated  with  the  spread  of 
Nardus  stricta  L.  and  other  less  palatable  species  such  as  Empetrum  (Welch,  1984).  In 
contrast,  on  Ilkley  Moor  our  data  indicate  that  Calluna,  Pteridium  and  Vaccinium  have 
increased  while  Empetrum  and  Eriophorum  species  have  declined.  Examination  of  the 
changes  in  the  plant  communities  on  Ilkley  Moor  (Fig.  3a-d)  reveals  that  different 
moorland  habitats  have  changed  in  different  ways.  Hence,  it  is  probably  unwise  to  regard 
Ilkley  Moor  as  one  single  unit  when  making  comparisons  with  other  findings.  Clearly, 
erroneous  conclusions  could  be  reached  by  assuming  that  observations  on  change  on  one 
moor  are  directly  applicable  to  the  whole  of  another  moor  where  the  habitats  may  differ. 
Possible  explanations  for  the  observed  changes  in  individual  species  abundance  and 
distribution  on  Ilkley  Moor  are  given  separately  below. 

Empetrum  Decline 

The  decrease  in  Empetrum  on  most  of  the  moor  might  have  arisen  from  climatic  change. 
On  Ilkley  Moor  Empetrum  is  close  to  its  south-eastern  limit  of  distribution  within  Britain 
(Bell  & Tallis,  1973).  Consequently,  any  tendency  toward  warming  or  drying  might  be 
expected  to  affect  it  adversely  on  this  site,  particularly  on  the  lower  slopes  of  the  moor 
where  a marked  decrease  was  noted  (Fig.  3d).  The  annual  climatic  data,  however,  show  no 
systematic  tendency  for  change  in  bright  sunshine,  temperature  or  precipitation.  There  was 
a slight  increase  in  the  number  of  frost  days,  but  it  is  unlikely  that  this  would  have  caused  a 
decline  in  a species  with  a northerly  distribution.  The  increase  in  stocking  rates  probably 
would  not  have  led  to  greater  grazing  pressure  as  Empetrum  is  relatively  unpalatable. 
However,  increased  sheep  numbers  could  have  led  to  an  increase  in  trampling  to  which  this 
species,  with  its  prostrate  stems,  would  be  particularly  susceptible  (Dalby,  1961;  Rawes, 
1983). 

Pteridium  Consolidation 

The  distribution  of  Pteridium  on  Ilkley  Moor  is  thought  to  be  limited  by  altitude  and 
exposure  (Fidler  et  al.,  1970).  Over  the  20  year  period  the  upper  limit  of  the  major  areas  of 
Pteridium  has  remained  below  the  350  metre  contour,  though  it  has  consolidated  its  hold 
within  the  areas  it  occupied  previously.  This  increased  occupancy  may  be  because 
increased  sheep  grazing  pressure  does  not  greatly  affect  Pteridium  due  to  its  unpalatability, 
and  its  spread  has  been  widely  recorded  in  other  upland  areas  of  Britain  (Anderson  & 
Yalden,  1981;  Hudson  & Newborn,  1989b). 

Eriophorum  Decline 

It  is  known  that  sheep  have  distinct  grazing  preferences  for  different  species  at  different 
times  of  the  year  (Hunter,  1962).  Therefore,  replacement  of  the  Eriophorum  species  by 
Calluna  in  parts  of  the  moor  may  well  be  associated  with  preferential  seasonal  (summer) 
grazing.  However,  details  of  such  preferences  are  not  entirely  understood  (Grant  et  al.. 


132 


Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  over  20  years 

1976),  and  also  it  is  not  known  how  grazing  pressure  varied  seasonally  on  Ilkley  Moor 
during  the  period.  Anderson  and  Yalden  (1981)  reported  that  under  a regime  of  increased 
sheep  grazing  Calluna  expanded  into  areas  of  Eriophorum.  They  suggest  that  this  spread  of 
Calluna  might  be  due  to  gully-erosion  caused  by  excessive  stocking  or  the  digging  of 
drainage  ditches.  Fidler  et  al.  (1970)  have  also  suggested  that  Ilkley  Moor  might  have  been 
drying  out,  and  that  this  would  adversely  affect  the  Eriophorum  species.  However,  these 
explanations  do  not  seem  appropriate  to  the  changes  reported  here.  Drainage  ditches  only 
affect  the  vegetation  immediately  adjacent  to  the  ditch  and  are  of  questionable  value  in 
changing  plant  communities  (Stewart  & Lance,  1983;  Coulson  et  al.,  1990),  and  indeed  on 
Ilkley  Moor  such  attempts  at  drainage  have  long  been  abandoned.  Moreover,  there  is 
virtually  no  evidence  of  active  gully  erosion  on  the  middle  and  upper  moor  where 
Eriophorum  has  experienced  major  decline  (Figs.  3a-c).  Nor  was  there  any  trend  to  reduced 
precipitation  over  this  period  which  might  have  led  to  the  moor  drying  out. 

A more  likely  possibility  is  that  the  frequency  of  burning  on  the  moor  has  declined. 
Though  there  are  no  comprehensive  records  of  past  burning,  the  1964  map  records  that 
large  areas  of  the  upper  moor  had  been  burned  at  that  time.  In  contrast,  no  such  extensive 
areas  were  recorded  on  the  1984  map,  and  field  observations  from  the  1970s  suggest  that 
burning  did  not  feature  strongly  in  the  management  regime  in  the  period  between  the  two 
surveys.  As  Eriophorum  species  are  known  to  be  early  colonisers  of  newly  burned  areas 
and  to  decline  when  Calluna  fully  establishes  itself  (Hobbs  & Gimingham,  1980;  Hobbs, 
1984),  the  reduced  burning  may  well  have  reduced  the  opportunities  for  Eriophorum 
colonisation  and  consequently  effected  a reduction  in  its  abundance. 

Calluna  Increase  - A Delayed  Effect? 

Calluna  has  increased  over  much  of  the  moor,  but  particularly  on  the  higher  areas  (Fig.  2). 
On  the  upper  moor  it  has  expanded  into  areas  that  were  formerly  bare  ground  and  has 
displaced  both  Empetrum  and  Eriophorum  (Figs.  3a, b).  Though  it  has  been  reported  that 
Calluna  may  be  stimulated  when  low  grazing  pressures  are  slightly  increased  (Welch, 
1984),  this  is  probably  not  an  explanation  for  the  major  expansion  of  Calluna  in  this 
period,  particularly  as  the  stocking  rates  are  such  that  Calluna  decline  might  be  expected.  It 
is  possible  that  other  competitor  species  may  have  been  worse  affected  by  stocking  density, 
for  example  Eriophorum  by  summer  grazing  and  Empetrum  by  trampling.  Alternatively, 
the  observed  increase  in  Calluna  may  reflect  the  long-term  effects  of  the  extensive  burning 
which  was  recorded  on  the  1964  map.  Burning  is  an  effective  treatment  which  stimulates 
the  growth  of  almost  pure  stands  of  Calluna  (Gimingham,  1972).  Moreover,  the 
widespread  extent  of  the  burned  areas  would  have  reduced  localised  grazing  pressures  on 
the  young  Calluna  and  this,  coupled  with  the  relatively  low  number  of  sheep  in  the  area  in 
the  1960s,  would  have  facilitated  the  establishment  of  Calluna  at  that  time.  Twenty  years 
later,  these  Calluna  stands  would  have  reached  the  most  vigorous  and  dominant  phase  of 
their  life  cycle,  and  other  species  would  consequently  have  been  adversely  affected. 

Conclusions 

The  records  of  vegetation  on  Ilkley  Moor  present  a rare  opportunity  to  observe  vegetation 
changes  throughout  the  twentieth  century,  and  the  existence  of  two  detailed  vegetation  maps 
allows  the  quantification  of  such  changes  to  be  made  over  a twenty  year  time  interval. 

Between  1903  and  1964  Calluna  declined  in  abundance,  but  increased  substantially  from 
the  mid-1960s  to  1984  despite  an  increase  in  sheep  numbers.  Though  several  suggestions 
may  be  advanced  to  explain  the  observed  vegetation  change,  we  consider  it  most  likely  that 
the  recent  changes  are  related  to  the  extensive  burning  which  occurred  twenty  years  ago. 
Climatic  parameters  over  the  period  1964-1984  show  little  consistent  variation  and  are  not 
likely  to  be  the  major  instigators  of  vegetation  change;  neither  are  the  ineffective  attempts 
to  drain  the  moor  by  digging  ditches.  The  spread  of  Pteridium  may  be  associated  with 
rising  sheep  numbers  in  this  period,  but  without  further  information  on  seasonal  numbers 
their  probable  effect  on  Calluna,  Empetrum  and  Eriophorum  cannot  be  determined. 


133 


Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  over  20  years 

Notable  differences  in  the  fate  of  species  within  different  communities  have  been  observed 
in  different  sections  of  the  moor.  Consequently,  regarding  a moor  as  one  uniform  whole 
may  be  inappropriate. 

Variations  in  the  burning  management  regimes  may  account  for  many  of  the  vegetation 
changes  on  the  moorland,  its  current  vegetation  communities  probably  reflecting  the 
extensive  disturbance  that  was  recorded  in  the  1960s.  Current  management  practice  in 
operation  since  1984,  which  includes  the  reduction  of  grazing  pressure,  may  not  maintain 
the  presently  improved  moorland  quality.  Indeed,  it  is  possible  that  the  relative 
abandonment  of  Calluna  burning  since  the  1960s  may  lead  to  a deterioration  of  the 
vegetation  in  the  coming  decades  despite  the  reduced  grazing  unless  there  is  further  active 
management. 

Summary 

Records  of  the  vegetation  of  Ilkley  Moor  date  back  to  1903.  Detailed  maps  of  the 
vegetation  of  l,000ha  of  the  moor,  completed  in  1964  and  1984,  were  compared  using  a 
grid  of  almost  9000  points  to  determine  the  vegetation  change,  notably  of  the  species 
Calluna  vulgaris  (L.)  Hull,  Empetrum  nigrum  L.,  Pteridium  aquilinum  (L.)  Kuhn, 
Vaccinium  myrtillus  L.,  Eriophorum  angustifolium  Honck.  and  Eriophorum  vaginatum  L. 
Although  different  community  classifications  were  adopted  in  the  two  surveys,  data 
derived  from  the  two  maps  could  be  compared  directly  without  undue  distortion  of  results. 
Comparison  of  the  two  surveys  indicated  marked  increases  in  percentage  occupancy  of  C. 
vulgaris , V.  myrtillus  and  P.  aquilinum , and  decreases  of  E.  nigrum  and  Eriophorum 
species.  The  specific  changes  also  varied  on  different  parts  of  the  moor. 

Trends  in  various  environmental  parameters  over  the  period  1964  to  1984  were  assessed 
to  try  to  explain  these  changes.  There  is  no  evidence  to  show  that  drainage  operations  have 
been  an  important  factor,  nor  that  there  have  been  any  consistent  climatic  trends  that  might 
have  affected  the  vegetation  composition.  The  vegetation  changes  cannot  be  explained 
solely  in  terms  of  alterations  in  grazing  pressure  by  sheep,  although  the  local  sheep 
numbers  were  found  to  have  increased  substantially  over  this  period.  Possible  effects  from 
trampling  by  sheep,  seasonal  grazing,  species  unpalatability  and  past  burning  regime  are 
discussed. 

Acknowledgments 

Thanks  are  due  to  the  members  of  the  survey  group,  Mr  P.  Baker,  Mr  A.  Bradford,  Mr  J. 
Brown,  Mr  S.  Pickard  and  Mr  S.  Short,  for  much  of  the  fieldwork  and  the  Manpower 
Services  Commission  for  financial  support.  Bradford  Metropolitan  District  Council 
provided  data  on  sheep  numbers  on  the  moor  during  the  1970s,  Dr  J.  E.  P.  Currall  helped 
supervise  the  survey  work,  Mrs  J.  E.  Duncan  provided  information  about  the  earlier 
Wharfedale  Naturalists  survey,  Mr  S.  Davidson  drew  the  figures,  Dr  D.  J.  Hambler  made 
helpful  comments  on  a draft  of  this  paper  and  Yorkshire  Water  provided  precipitation  data 
for  Reva  and  Weecher  Reservoirs. 

References 

Anderson,  P.  and  Yalden,  D.  W.  (1981)  Increased  sheep  numbers  and  the  loss  of  heather 
moorland  in  the  Peak  District,  England.  Biological  Conservation  20:  195-213. 

Bell,  J.  N.  B.  and  Tallis,  J.  H.  (1973)  Biological  flora  of  the  British  Isles:  Empetrum 
nigrum  L.  Journal  of  Ecology  61:  289-305. 

Bunce,  R.  G.  H.,  ed.  (1989)  Heather  in  England  and  Wales.  ITE  Research  Publication 
No.  3,  HMSO,  London. 

Cotton,  D.  E.  and  Hale,  W.  H.  G.  (1989)  Vegetation  changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  1964-1984. 
Naturalist  114:  109-1 14. 

Coulson,  J.  C.,  Butterfield,  J.  E.  L.  and  Henderson,  E.  (1990)  The  effect  of  open  drainage 
ditches  on  the  plant  and  invertebrate  communities  of  moorland  and  on  the  decomposition 
of  peat.  Journal  of  Applied  Ecology  27:  549-561. 


134 


Book  Reviews 


Cranbrook,  Earl  of  (1991)  Upland  heather:  international  importance  and  objectives  for 
nature  conservation.  In:  Heather  (ed.  R.  W.  Brown).  Proceedings  of  the  National  Heather 
Convention.  Seale  Hayne  Faculty,  Polytechnic  South  West,  Devon. 

Dalby,  M.  (1961)  The  ecology  of  crowberry  (. Empetrum  nigrum ) on  Ilkley  Moor  1959-60. 
Naturalist  86:  37-40. 

Dalby,  M.,  Fidler,  J.  H.,  Fidler,  A.  and  Duncan,  J.  E.  (1971)  The  vegetative  changes  on 
Ilkley  Moor.  Naturalist  96:  19-56. 

Fidler,  J.  H.,  Dalby,  M.  and  Duncan,  J.  E.  (1970)  The  plant  communities  of  Ilkley  Moor. 
Naturalist  95:  41-48. 

Gimingham,  C.  H.  (1972)  Ecology  of  Heathlands.  Chapman  & Hall,  London. 

Grant,  S.  A.,  Lamb,  W.  I.  C.,  Kerr,  C.  D.  and  Bolton,  G.  R.  (1976)  The  utilization  of 
blanket  bog  vegetation  by  grazing  sheep.  Journal  of  Applied  Ecology  13:  857-869. 
Hewson,  R.  (1977)  The  effect  on  heather  Calluna  vulgaris  of  excluding  sheep  from 
moorland  in  north-east  England.  Naturalist  102:  133-136. 

Hobbs,  R.  J.  (1984)  Length  of  burning  rotation  and  community  composition  in  high-level 
Calluna-Eriophorum  bog  in  N.  England.  Vegetatio  57:  129-136. 

Hobbs,  R.  J.  and  Gimingham,  C.  H.  (1987)  Vegetation,  fire  and  herbivore  interactions  in 
heathland.  Advances  in  Ecological  Research  16:  87-173. 

Hudson,  P.  and  Newborn,  D.  (1989a)  The  conservation  of  heather  moorlands.  The  Game 
Conservancy  Review  1988:  111-117. 

Hudson,  P.  and  Newborn,  D.  (1989b)  The  environmental  impact  of  bracken.  The  Game 
Conservancy  Review  1988 : 1 17-119. 

Hunter,  R.  F.  (1962)  Hill  sheep  and  their  pasture:  a study  of  sheep-grazing  in  south-east 
Scotland.  Journal  of  Ecology  50:  651-680. 

Lamming,  P.  D.  (1969)  The  geology  of  Ilkley  Moor.  Naturalist  94:  53-54. 

Rawes,  M.  (1983)  Changes  in  two  high  altitude  blanket  bogs  after  the  cessation  of  sheep 
grazing.  Journal  of  Ecology  71:  219-235. 

Rawes,  M.  and  Hobbs,  R.  (1979)  Management  of  semi-natural  blanket  bog  in  the  northern 
Pennines.  Journal  of  Ecology  67:  789-807. 

Smith,  W.  G.  and  Moss,  C.  E.  (1903)  Geographical  distribution  of  vegetation  in  Yorkshire. 

Part  1 - Leeds  and  Halifax  District.  Geographical  Journal  21:  375-401. 

Stewart,  A.  J.  A.  and  Lance,  A.  N.  (1983)  Moor  draining:  a review  of  impacts  on  land  use. 

Journal  of  Environmental  Management  17:  81-99. 

Welch,  D.  (1984)  Studies  in  the  grazing  of  heather  moorland  in  north-east  Scotland.  III. 
Floristics.  Journal  of  Applied  Ecology  21:  209-225. 


BOOK  REVIEWS 

The  Freshwater  Crustacea  of  Yorkshire:  A Faunistic  and  Ecological  Survey  by 
Geoffrey  Fryer.  Pp.  312,  with  58  figures.  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union  and  The  Leeds 
Philosophical  and  Literary  Society,  1993.  £16.00  paperback. 

This  remarkable  book  is,  in  my  opinion,  essential  reading  for  all  freshwater  ecologists.  It  is 
a detailed  account  of  the  distribution  of  Yorkshire’s  freshwater  crustaceans  based  primarily 
on  the  author’s  own  meticulous  observations  made  over  several  decades.  This  work  is 
unique  in  its  scope  - in  the  number  of  sites  examined,  the  number  of  samples  taken,  the 
precision  and  number  of  measurements  made  of  environmental  parameters,  and  in  the 
wealth  of  background  information  provided  on  the  geology,  fauna  and  flora  of  the  region. 
The  core  of  the  book  is  the  analysis  of  distribution  patterns,  both  by  habitat  type  and  by 
species,  but  it  also  includes  short  chapters  on  classification  and  taxonomy,  biogeographical 
factors  and  conservation  issues.  The  text  is  well  organised  and  amply  supplied  with 
distribution  maps  and  line  drawings  of  the  species. 

The  regional  nature  of  the  work  does  not,  however,  mean  that  the  results  are  only  of 


Book  Reviews 


135 


regional,  or  even  national  interest.  In  fact,  this  work  clearly  demonstrates  the  paramount 
importance  of  making  observations  at  a scale  appropriate  to  the  organisms  concerned,  and 
raises  numerous  points  of  general  biological  significance: 

1 . The  concept  of  ubiquity  in  the  distribution  of  particular  organisms  has  previously  been 
considered  on  anthropomorphic  scales;  on  the  microhabitat  scale  appropriate  to  small 
crustaceans  the  concept  requires  much  qualification. 

2.  Acidity  is  a great  restricter  of  diversity  and  can  exclude  a sensitive  species  from  one 
water  body  only  metres  away  from  another  where  it  breeds  successfully. 

3.  The  dispersal  ability  of  freshwater  microcrustaceans  is  emphasised  by  the  temporal 
dimension  of  the  data. 

4.  The  extraordinary  persistence  of  individual  species  at  given  microhabitats,  such  as  a 
seepage  by  the  side  of  the  road,  is  demonstrated  over  extended  periods  of  time. 

5.  It  points  to  the  relative  importance  of  factors  such  as  altitude,  soil  type  and  water 
chemistry  in  determining  distributions  of  small  aquatic  organisms. 

6.  There  is  a link  between  small  scale  distribution  patterns  and  the  behaviour  of  species. 

This  work  is  not,  to  use  the  modem  jargon,  big  science  but  it  shows  that  a big 

contribution  to  scientific  progress  can  still  be  made  by  genuine  natural  historians.  It 
reminds  us  that,  however  much  we  are  able  to  explain  the  distributions  of  living  organisms 
and  relate  them  to  environmental  parameters,  they  are  not  entirely  predictable  and  there 
will  always  remain  a few  occurrences  that  are  inexplicable.  I found  this  book  fascinating 
and  I recommend  it,  as  an  invaluable  reference  work,  to  those  working  on  the  ecology  of 
freshwater  organisms  and  to  all  natural  historians  interested  in  the  diversity  of  life.  The 
price  is  very  reasonable  and  the  attractive  cover  and  layout  of  the  text  make  it  suitable  as  a 
present. 

GAB 

Biogeography  and  Ecology  of  the  Rain  Forests  of  Eastern  Africa,  edited  by  Jon  C. 
Lovett  and  Samuel  K.  Wasser.  Pp.  x + 341  with  numerous  line  drawings  & tables.  1993. 
Cambridge  University  Press.  £75.00  hardback. 

Tropical  rain  forests  are  disappearing  at  an  alarming  rate,  and  no  more  so  than  in  eastern 
Africa.  As  pointed  out  by  Rodgers  in  the  final  chapter  of  this  book,  there  is  a dearth  of 
information  on  forest  conservation;  although  it  is  increasingly  understood  by  administrators 
and  planners  that  forests  are  essential  for  our  survival,  resulting  in  some  cases,  e.g. 
Tanzania,  in  policies  and  action  plans  for  long-term  sustainable  use  and  conservation  of 
forest  resources,  this  realization  has  coincided  with  a period  of  extreme  economic 
difficulty.  There  are  no  local  funds  to  implement  enlightened  policies,  so  forest 
conservation  must  therefore  depend  largely  on  foreign  aid. 

It  is  hoped  that  Rodger’s  thought-provoking  chapter  will  impress  on  politicians  and 
donor  organizations  the  necessity  of  such  assistance,  but  the  chapters  preceding  it  are  quite 
clearly  aimed  as  a scientific  audience.  Short  introductory  chapters  on  the  geological 
evolution,  climatic  history  and  general  biogeography  and  ecology  of  east  African  rain 
forests  are  followed  by  two  chapters  detailing  the  flora.  The  remaining  chapters  (with  the 
exception  of  that  on  conservation)  are  concerned  with  forest  millipedes,  Linyphiid  spiders, 
mountain  butterflies,  herpetofauna,  avifauna  and  mammals  (mainly  monkeys).  Each 
chapter  reveals  the  exceptional  biodiversity  and  the  high  level  of  endemism  within  East 
African  rain  forests,  and  together  they  provide  a unique  insight  into  tropical  evolutionary 
processes  and  the  need  for  effective  management  practices  if  they  are  to  be  successfully 
conserved. 

It  is  ironic  that  the  very  high  price  of  this  important  volume  will  preclude  its  purchase  by 
those  at  the  sharp  end  of  the  problem,  namely  East  Africans,  and  by  students;  one  can  only 
hope  that  it  will  find  its  way  into  many  libraries  so  that  its  research  data,  and  the  underlying 
conservation  messages  therein,  can  reach  the  widest  possible  audience. 


MRDS 


136 


Book  Reviews 


Red  Data  Books  of  Britain  and  Ireland:  Stoneworts  by  N.  F.  Stewart  and  J.  M. 
Church.  Pp.  143,  including  numerous  line  drawings  & 8 pages  of  colour  plates.  1992. 
Available  from:  Publications  Branch,  Joint  Nature  Conservation  Committee,  Monkstone 
House,  City  Road,  Peterborough  PEI  1JY.  £15.00  (hardback),  plus  postage  & packing. 

As  well  as  providing  an  important  conservation  database  for  a group  of  plants  severely 
threatened  by  the  continual  disappearance  or  modification  of  suitable  water  systems,  this 
book  is  also  a useful  reference  guide  and  should  stimulate  greater  interest  in  these 
fascinating  plants.  Despite  the  regrettable  lack  of  detailed  knowledge  of  the  distribution  of 
many  species,  the  authors  have  assembled  distributional  maps  and  ecological  information 
which  present  a reasonable  picture  of  the  status  and  vulnerability  of  21  out  of  a total  British 
and  Irish  charophyte  flora  of  33  species  - obviously  a remarkable  state  affairs  when  two- 
thirds  of  a flora  need  to  be  listed  in  a Red  Data  Book!  The  usefulness  of  this  slim  volume  is 
extended  by  the  presence  of  a key  to  all  species  and  a section  on  the  more  general  habits 
and  habitats  of  the  group.  A pity  such  a high  price  is  levied  on  publications  of  such  vital 
importance  to  understanding  and  solving  conservation  problems. 

MRDS 

Stewart  & Corry’s  Flora  of  the  North-east  of  Ireland,  edited  by  Paul  Hackney,  with 
the  assistance  of  Stan  Beesley,  John  Harron  and  Doreen  S.  Lambert.  Pp.  xi  + 419 
(including  numerous  line  drawings  & b/w  plates),  plus  8 pages  of  full  colour  plates.  1992. 
Institute  of  Irish  Studies,  The  Queen’s  University  of  Belfast,  Belfast  BT7  INN.  £17.50, 
plus  £1.00  post  & packing. 

This  completely  revised  and  remodelled  edition  of  S.  A.  Stewart  and  T.  H.  Corry’s  Flora  is 
a worthy  successor  to  the  two  earlier  editions  (1888,  1938)  and  maintains  the  very  high 
standard  of  recent  local  floras  which  are  a hallmark  of  British  and  Irish  botany. 

The  Flora,  which  covers  the  counties  of  Down,  Antrim  and  Londonderry,  includes 
introductory  chapters  on  the  history  of  the  study  of  the  flora  (8pp.),  some  comparisons  with 
the  floras  of  adjoining  areas  (4pp.),  history  of  the  vegetation  and  influence  of  man  (19pp.), 
topographical  and  climatic  details  (30pp.)  and  an  edited  section  (8pp.)  of  Robert  Lloyd 
Praeger’s  ‘Botanist’s  Guide’  from  the  1938  edition.  The  Flora  is  richly  illustrated 
throughout  with  line  drawings  (mainly  maps)  and  excellent  photographic  plates  (some  in 
colour),  mainly  of  plants  and  their  habitats. 

The  major  section  of  the  Flora  (283pp.)  is  devoted  to  inventories  of  vascular  plant  and 
charophyte  records,  the  former  based  mainly  on  the  nomenclature  of  Clapham,  Tutin  and 
Moore  (1987),  giving  detailed  data  on  localities,  recorders  and  dates,  as  well  as  succinct, 
but  useful,  information  on  ecology  and  abundance  of  each  species.  Synonymy  is  provided, 
but  its  usefulness  in  the  text  is  limited  by  the  index  (14pp.)  which  provides  full  common 
English  names,  but  Latin  names  to  generic  level  only.  An  extensive  gazetteer  (31pp.)  is  a 
particularly  helpful  feature  of  the  volume. 

The  editor  and  his  assistants,  those  who  contributed  introductory  chapters,  the  many 
botanists  involved  in  its  compilation  and  the  publishers  are  all  to  be  congratulated  on 
providing  a comprehensive  source  of  information  which  is  also  very  attractively  presented. 

MRDS 

Green  Roads  in  the  Mid-Pennines  by  A.  Raistrick.  Moorland  Publishing.  Paperback 
edition  1991.  £6.99. 

The  title  and  cover  of  this  slim  paperback  by  the  late  Arthur  Raistrick  will  be  inviting  to 
many  people  who  enjoy  walking  in  the  Yorkshire  Dales.  However,  the  unwary  reader  may 
be  in  for  a surprise.  Originally  published  in  1962  as  Green  Tracks  in  the  Pennines,  this 
book  has  been  little  altered  since  the  1978  edition  and  in  many  ways  falls  short  of  what  is 
expected  from  a modem  guidebook.  The  introductory  chapter  is  interesting  and  readable 


Book  Reviews 


137 


but  extremely  brief  (five  pages).  The  majority  of  the  following  chapters  consist  of 
descriptions  of  the  routes  taken  by  the  old  roads,  with  insufficient  historical  and  descriptive 
detail  to  make  the  narrative  come  alive.  As  the  author  admitted,  many  of  the  tracks  are  now 
‘macadamised’,  which  renders  the  term  ‘green  roads’  somewhat  euphemistic. 

Scant  attention  is  paid  to  the  many  changes  in  the  Pennine  landscape  which  have 
occurred  since  Raistrick’s  original  fieldwork  was  carried  out.  The  descriptions  of  the  routes 
rely  entirely  on  the  names  of  villages,  streams,  inns,  etc,  without  the  benefit  of  grid 
references.  This  makes  the  text  extremely  difficult  to  follow,  even  with  a large-scale  map 
to  hand,  except  for  those  who  already  possess  an  intimate  knowledge  of  the  area.  The  maps 
in  the  book  are  very  poor,  sketchy  affairs,  and  of  little  use  for  illustrating  the  routes  in 
question.  The  photographs  and  drawings,  by  contrast,  are  delightful  and  informative. 

In  short  this  book  is  disappointing  in  that  it  provides  neither  a practical  guide  for  those 
wishing  to  walk  the  green  roads  nor  a detailed  historical  account  of  their  development  for 
those  wishing  to  learn  more  about  them  from  the  comfort  of  their  armchairs.  It  may  have 
broken  new  ground  when  it  was  originally  published  in  1962,  but  thirty  years  later  the  book 
has  a quaint,  old-fashioned  feel  to  it.  Styles  of  writing  and  presentation  have  changed 
almost  as  much  as  the  green  roads  themselves.  The  reader  of  the  1990s  is  looking  for 
something  more  modem  and  ‘user-friendly’  to  guide  him  or  her  through  the  by-ways  of  old 
England. 

MA 


Coppiced  Woodlands:  their  management  for  wildlife  by  R.  J.  Fuller  and  M.  S. 
Warren.  2nd  edition.  Pp.  34  (including  9 figures),  plus  4 pages  of  colour  plates. 
Woodland  Rides  and  Glades:  their  management  for  wildlife  by  M.  S.  Warren  and  R. 
J.  Fuller.  2nd  edition.  Pp.  32  (including  9 figures),  plus  4 pages  of  colour  plates.  1993. 
Joint  Nature  Conservation  Committee,  Peterborough.  £3.50  (plus  postage)  each,  paperback. 
Available  from:  Natural  History  Book  Service  Ltd.,  2-3  Wills  Road,  Totnes,  Devon  TQ9 
5XN.  (£2  is  charged  for  postage  & packing  on  orders  below  £10.) 

These  useful  booklets  on  woodland  conservation,  first  published  in  1990  (see  Naturalist 
117:  62),  quickly  went  out  of  print  due  to  popular  demand.  Their  return,  in  revised  and 
expanded  form,  will  be  widely  welcomed. 


The  Beast  of  Exmoor  and  other  mystery  predators  of  Britain  by  Di  Francis.  Pp.  150, 
with  4 pages  of  photographs.  Jonathan  Cape.  1993.  £14.99  hardback,  £7.99  paperback. 

Initially,  I was  uncertain  whether  this  book  was  suitable  for  review  in  The  Naturalist. 
However,  on  reading  it  through  I realised  it  contained  a considerable  amount  of 
information  about  large  wild  cats,  such  as  pumas,  tigers  and  leopards,  and  their  taxonomy, 
habits  and  habitat,  which  any  mammalogist  would  find  of  interest.  Most  of  the  book,  which 
is  anecdotal,  is  about  large  wild  cats  roaming  the  British  countryside,  causing  considerable 
damage  to  farming  stock,  especially  sheep.  The  story  starts  with  the  spring  of  1983,  when 
farmers  on  the  southern  fringes  of  Exmoor  began  losing  their  sheep  and  lambs  at  an 
alarming  rate.  Local  farmers,  police  and  a detachment  of  marines  failed  to  track  down 
the  mystery  predator.  According  to  the  authoress,  Di  Francis,  who  is  described  as  a 
naturalist,  water  colour  artist  and  journalist,  various  expert  zoological  opinions  have  been 
sought  and  expressed  within  the  book  on  the  possible  predator  involved.  Unfortunately,  no 
satisfactory  answer  has  been  found  to  date,  as  physical  evidence  of  these  elusive  predatory 
cats  is  very  limited.  In  some  ways  the  book  can  be  described  as  a naturalist’s  ‘who  done  it’, 
and  would  make  suitable  reading  for  a long  train  journey,  for,  at  times,  I found  it  very 
captivating. 


MJAT 


138  Book  Reviews 

Journey  into  Dolphin  Dreamtime  by  Horace  Dibbs.  Pp.  208  with  22  colour  plates.  1993 
Jonathan  Cape,  £8.99. 

This  is  the  latest  in  a long  list  of  successful  contributions  on  dolphins  and  dolphin  therapy 
by  Horace  Dibbs.  The  author  introduces  the  reader  to  several  situations  where  dolphins  not 
only  show  a positive  empathy  to  man  but  also  on  numerous  occasions  have  a positive 
therapeutic  affect,  particularly  in  areas  such  as  clinical  depression.  The  explanation  for  this 
the  author  locates  in  the  Australian  aboriginal  ethos  and  philosophy  of  spatial  identity  with 
the  environment,  or  their  dreamtime.  The  author’s  arguments  are  at  times  difficult  to  follow 
although  the  overall  presentation  is  interesting  and  stimulating. 

MJD 

The  Golem.  What  everybody  needs  to  know  about  science  by  Harry  Collins  and 
Trevor  Pinch.  Pp.  xii  + 264,  including  line  drawings  & tables.  Cambridge  University 
Press.  1993.  £10.95  hardback. 

A series  of  case  studies  for  different  scientific  disciplines  are  fascinatingly  portrayed  by  the 
authors,  who  show  that  science  is  not  “the  straightforward  result  of  competent  theorization, 
observation  and  experimentation”.  Of  particular  interest  to  readers  are  the  chapters  on 
‘edible  knowledge’  (the  chemical  transfer  of  memory  in  planarians),  ‘the  germs  of  dissent’ 
(spontaneous  generation  of  life)  and  ‘the  sex  life  of  the  whiptail  lizard’  (pseudocopulatory 
behaviour  and  its  possible  role  in  priming  reproductive  mechanisms).  Written  in  a lively 
style,  but  one  all  too  typical  of  the  social  scientist,  this  work  will  make  stimulating  reading, 
with  such  interpretive  gems  as  . . 17000  trained  goldfish  gave  their  lives  in  the 
production  of  750  grams  of  colour  discriminating  brains  . . .”  (p.23)  and  . . the  number  of 
‘love  bites’  the  lizards  underwent  and  whether  or  not  they  waved  their  hands  as  a sign  of 
sexual  submission  both  became  important”  (p.l  17). 

IJH 

Microscopic  Life  in  Sphagnum  by  Marjorie  Hingley,  illustrated  by  Peter  Hayward  and 
Diana  Herrett.  Pp.  64,  with  4 colour  plates  and  numerous  b/w  illustrations.  Naturalists’ 
Handbook  no. 20.  Richmond  Publishing,  Slough.  1993.  £13.00  hardback,  £7.95  paperback. 

Many  naturalists  and  academics  will  find  this  book  an  inspiration  for  further  studies  into 
the  various  forms  of  life  found  in  and  amongst  the  leaves  of  Sphagna  (bogmosses).  It 
briefly  covers  the  type  and  variety  of  habitat  in  which  species  of  Sphagna  are  found  and 
their  physical  and  chemical  environment.  The  comprehensive  review  of  the  life  forms 
found  in  and  on  their  leaves  is  clear  and  concise.  The  excellent  illustrations  and  key  can  be 
used  to  identify  some  of  the  life  forms  at  least  to  genus  level.  The  book  includes  the 
following:  algae,  cyanobacteria,  flagellates,  naked  amobae,  helizoans,  testate  rhizopods, 
ciliates,  rotifers,  flatworms,  nematodes,  segmented  worms,  gastrotrichs,  Crustacea  and 
mites.  One  of  the  strengths  of  this  small  book  lies  in  the  many  projects  or  investigations 
that  it  could  generate,  with  suggestions  on  how  they  can  be  carried  out  with  little  expense 
other  than  a good  microscope.  I would  highly  recommend  this  title  to  both  botanists  and 
zoologists. 

ADH 

The  Earth  as  Transformed  by  Human  Action:  Global  and  Regional  Changes  in  the 
Biosphere  over  the  Past  300  years  edited  by  B.  L.  Turner,  W.  C.  Clarke,  R.  W.  Kater, 
J.  F.  Richards,  J.  T.  Mathews  and  W.  B.  Meyer.  Pp.  xvi  + 713,  including  numerous 
black  and  white  illustrations  and  photographs.  Cambridge  University  Press.  1993.  £27.95 
paperback. 

The  reviewer  must  admit  to  not  having  read  all  of  this  book,  and  most  probably  never  will 
read  every  word;  however,  he  does  expect  to  go  on  referring  to  it  for  the  rest  of  his 


Contributors 


139 


professional  life!  The  Earth  as  Transformed  by  Human  Action  is  a monumental  book  both 
in  size  and  inclusiveness,  with  713  pages  of  very  small  print.  It  contains  42  chapters  each 
written  by  acknowledged  experts  plus  Foreword,  Preface  and  Postscript. 

The  work  is  very  much  in  the  vein  of  the  influential  and  authoritative  work  Man  s Role  in 
Changing  the  Face  of  the  Earth  (W.  L.  Thomas,  1956,  Chicago  University  Press).  The 
work  under  review  arose  from  a meeting  convened  by  the  Geography  Department  at  Clark 
University  in  1987  as  part  of  the  universities  centennial  celebrations.  As  such  the 
contributions  have  a strong  ‘geographical  flavour’  which  makes  the  important 
environmental  issues  covered  amenable  to  the  lay  reader.  After  a thoughtful  introduction 
by  the  principal  editors,  the  volume  is  divided  into  four  sections:  Changes  in  population 
and  society  (7  chapters);  Transformations  of  the  global  environment,  sub-divided  into 
Land,  Water,  Oceans  and  atmosphere.  Biota,  and  Chemicals  and  radiation,  (19  chapters); 
Regional  studies  of  transformations  (12  chapters)  and  Understanding  transformations  (3 
chapters).  Among  the  many  stimulating  chapters  those  covering  carbon  (by  R.  A. 
Houghton  and  David  Skole),  sulphur  (by  R.  B.  and  J.  D.  Husar)  and  nitrogen  and 
phosphorous  (by  V.  Smil),  are  notable  as  models  of  clarity  and  conciseness. 

This  is  a blockbuster  of  a book,  excellently  produced,  with  good  clear  illustrations,  and 
modestly  priced.  It  should  be  read  by  all  who  have  an  interest  in  man’s  effect  on  the 
environment,  and  like  Man  s Role  in  Changing  the  Face  of  the  Earth  is  likely  to  be  a 
standard  source  of  ideas  and  examples  for  many  years  to  come. 

DEC 


CONTRIBUTORS 


Angus,  R.  B.  26-27 

Archer,  M.  E.  13-15,26,37-44 

Atherden,  M.  92-93,  94,  136-137 

Barker,  A.  100 

Bamham,  M.  47-53 

Blackburn,  J.  M.  99-100 

Blocked,  T.  L.  96-97 

Boatman,  D.  J.  71-78 

Boxhall,  G.  A.  134-135 

Brightman,  F.  H.  30 

Caulton,  E.  79-85 

Chicken,  E.  24-25,91-92 

Cotton,  D.  E.  32,  1 23- 1 34,  1 38- 1 39 

Crackles,  F.  E.  21 

Crossley,  R.  17-18,  55-60,  87-89 

Cudworth,  J.  95 

Dale,  J.  E.  9-12 

Delany , M.  J.  45-46,  89-90,  1 38 

Denton,  M.  L.  95-96,  98 

Duncan,  J.  E.  21-25 

Fiskin,  J.  79-85 

Flint,  J.  H.  18-20 

Foggitt,  G.  T.  47-53 

Gilbert,  O.  L.  3-8,  70 

Godfrey,  A.  15-16 

Goulder,  R.  85-87 

Grant,  D.  R.  22-23,  94,  96,  99 

Hale,  W.  H.G.  90,  123-134 

Hambler,  C.  27-28 


Hambler,  D.  J.  28-29 
Headley,  A.  D.  20,  29,  138 
Henderson,  A.  54,  92 
Hinton,  V.  A.  30 
Hodgkiss,  I.  J.  138 
Horsman,  F.  60-61 
Howes,  C.  A.  31,61-63,67-70 
Jones,  D.  107-114 
Lawson,  R.  27 
Leedale,  G.  F.  101-106 
Limbert,  M.  44-45 
Lloyd-Evans,  L.  100 
Lunn,  J.  9-12 

Magee,  L.  23-24,  97,  98-99,  115-122 

Marsh,  R.  J.  64,  99 

McKean,  D.  R.  12 

Medd,  T.  F.  21-22,24 

Millward,  D.  99 

Norris,  A.  17,95 

Pashby,  S.  91 

Payne,  J.  91,93-94,95,96,98 
Payne,  K.  G.  53-54 
Phillips,  S.  67-70 
Potter,  T.  31 
Ratliffe,  L.  V.  47-53 
Richardson,  D.  T.  98-99,  122 
Seaward,  M.  R.  D.  16,  31,  32,  78,  94, 
97,  100,  135,  136 
Skidmore,  P.  61-63 


140 


Index 


Sykes,  M.  97,  100 
Thompson,  M.  J.  A.  46-47,  137 
Varty,  C.  G.  63-64 
Wallis,  A.  J.  93 


Wardhaugh,  A.  A.  33-37 
Watling,  R.  29-30 
Yalden,  D.  W.  65-67 
Yeates,  C.  S.  V.  91-100 


INDEX 


Algology 

Freshwater  algae  in  Yorkshire,  101-106 

Aquatic  Ecology 

Aquatic  vegetation  and  resumption  of  flow  after  drought  in  a Wold  winterbourne,  85-87 
Book  Reviews 

12,  16,  20,  26-32,  45-47,  53-54,  64,  70,  78,  89-90,  100,  122,  134-139 

Botany 

Botanical  reports  for  1992,  21-25;  Backhouse  and  the  Killamey  Fern,  60-61;  Vegetation 
changes  on  Ilkley  Moor  between  1964  and  1984,  123-134 

Conchology 

Pisidium  tenuilineatum  new  to  Yorkshire,  17 

Entomology 

Aculeate  Hymenoptera  in  Yorkshire  and  the  development  of  a quality  scoring  system,  13- 
15;  Systenus  pallidus  in  Yorkshire,  15-16;  Trifid  Bur-marigold  and  associated  flies,  17- 
18;  Entomological  reports  for  1987-1992:  Hymenoptera,  18-20;  Aculeate  wasps  and 
bees  of  Duncombe  Park,  37-44;  Recent  changes  in  butterfly  distribution  in  the  Harrogate 
district,  47-53;  Notes  on  the  Empidoidea  of  the  Lower  Derwent  Valley,  55-60;  Bat-flies 
in  Yorkshire,  61-63;  Sciomyzidae  of  the  Lower  Derwent  Valley  Nature  Reserve,  87-89 

Fish 

The  Grayling  in  Yorkshire,  115-122 
Historical  Ecology 

History  and  status  of  North  Cliffe  Wood,  71-78 

Lichenology 

The  lichen  flora  of  Derbyshire  - supplement  3,  3-8 

Mammals 

Bats  and  their  roosts  in  Cleveland  II,  33-37;  Chad’s  shrews,  65-67;  Yorkshire  Cetaceans: 
strandings  and  sightings  1985  to  1992,  67-70 

Marine  Ecology 

Observations  on  the  Cnidaria  inhabiting  an  intertidal  mussel  bed  in  Morecambe  Bay,  107- 
114 

Obituary 

Margaret  Revell  Sanderson,  63-64 

Ornithology 

Breeding  activities  of  Parrot  Crossbills  in  South  Yorkshire  in  1983,  9-12 

Palynology 

Pollen  diagrams  from  17th  century  turf  roof,  Rosslyn  Chapel,  79-85 

Personalia 

Portrait  of  Thomas  Bunker  of  Goole,  44-45 

Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union 

Excursions  in  1992,  91-100 


PUBLICATIONS  FOR  SALE 

A Fungus  Flora  of  Yorkshire.  1985.  296  pp.  Hardback.  £10.00  incl.  p&p. 
Butterflies  and  Moths  of  Yorkshire.  1 989.  380  pp.  Paperback.  £ 1 7.50 
incl.  p&p.  Unbound.  £12.15  incl.  p&p. 

Mammals  of  Yorkshire.  1985.  256  pp.  £7.50  incl.  p&p. 

Protection  of  Birds  Committee  Centenary  Year,  1891-1991.  73  pp.  £6.00 
incl.  p&p. 

Moths  and  Butterflies  of  Spurn  ,1991.  124  pp.  £6  incl.  p&p. 

Cheques  should  be  made  payable  to  Y.N.U. 

From:  Mrs  J.  Payne,  15  Broad  Lane,  Cawood,  Selby,  North  Yorkshire,  Y08  0SQ. 
Telephone:  0757  268242 


‘The  Naturalist’  is  available  in  microform 

UNIVERSITY  MICROFILMS  INTERNATIONAL 


300  North  Zeeb  Road 
Dept  PR 

Ann  Arbor,  Mi  48106 
USA 


White  Swan  House 
Godstone 
Surrey  RH9  8LW 
England 


Binding 

Why  not  have  your  copies  of  The  Naturalist  bound  into  volumes? 
One  year’s  issues  per  volume,  or  alternatively  two  years  in  one 
volume  at  less  cost  than  binding  as  two  separate  volumes.  We  are 
also  experienced  and  expert  in  the  re-binding  and  repairing  of  all 
books. 

Spink  & Thackray 
Broomfield  Bindery 
Back  Broomfield  Crescent 

LEEDS  LS6  3BP  Telephone  0532  780353 


The  Irish  Naturalists’  Journal 

A quarterly  journal  of  Irish  natural  history 
Edited  by  Dr  Robin  Govier 
Annual  subscription  £12.50,  IR  £14.00 

Further  information  from  the  Editor,  INJ 
Medical  & Biological  Centre,  Lisburn  Road, 
Belfast  BT9  7BL 


Printed  in  Great  Britain  by  Titus  Wilson  & Son,  Kendal 


ISSN  0028-0771 


SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  LIBRARIES 


3 9088  01206  3640 


Latest  publication  of  the  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union 

THE  FRESHWATER  CRUSTACEA  OF  YORKSHIRE 

a faunistic  & ecological  survey 
by 

GEOFFREY  FRYER 

The  crustacean  fauna  of  Yorkshire  reflects  the  great  physiographic  diversity  of  the 
region.  Adopting  an  ecological  approach,  this  book  considers  the  Yorkshire  fauna  in 
relation  to  climate,  topography,  geology,  soils  and  water  chemistry,  always  keeping  in 
mind  that  it  is  dealing  with  living  organisms  whose  habits,  requirements  and 
physiological  limitations  determine  exactly  where  they  live. 

Matters  covered  include  the  ecological  background;  faunal  assemblages  and  their 
regional  attributes;  an  analysis  of  the  factors  that  determine  distribution  patterns,  many 
of  which  are  mapped;  wide  geographical  aspects;  and  conservation.  Large  areas,  such 
as  the  Pennines,  Howgill  Fells,  North  Eastern  uplands  and  the  lowland  plains  are 
surveyed.  So  too  are  localised  regions  including  Whemside,  the  Malham  area,  lowland 
heaths,  and  the  largest  lakes,  as  well  as  habitats  such  as  upland  tarns,  seepages,  cold 
springs,  small  lowland  ponds,  inland  saline  waters.  Notes  are  given  on  every  species 
recorded,  including  parasitic  forms. 

Price  £16.00  (plus  £2.00  per  copy  p.&p.)  Special  offer  to  member  of  the  Yorkshire 
Naturalists’  Union  £13.50  (plus  £2.00  p.&p.) 

Please  make  cheques  payable  to  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union. 

Available  from:  Professor  M.  R.  D.  Seaward,  Department  of  Environmental 
Science,  University  of  Bradford,  Bradford  BD7  1DP.