Skip to main content

Full text of "The naturalist"

See other formats


January-March  2010  Number  1072 


A QUARTERLY  JOURNAL  OL  NATURAL  HISTORY  LOR  THE  NORTH  OL  ENGLAND 


Whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae)  of  Watsonian  Yorkshire  - 

Chris  Malumphy 

Wall  Ferns  in  East  Hull,  2004-2008  - R.  Middleton 

Botanical  Report  for  2009  - Flowering  Plants  and  Ferns  -P.P.  Abbott 

The  Ostracod  Scottia  pseudobrowniana  Kempf,  an  Addition  to  the 
Freshwater  Fauna  of  Yorkshire,  and  a Note  on  the  Evolution  of 
Terrestrial  Habits  in  Ostracods  and  other  Crustaceans  - 

Andy  Godfrey,  Geoffrey  Fryer  and  David  J.  Horne 

The  Status  of  Moorland  Breeding  Birds  in  The  Peak  District  National 
Park  2004  - Peter  Middleton  and  Geoff  Carr 


Published  by  the  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union 


Editor  M.  R.  D.  Seaward  MSc,  PhD,  DSc,  FLS,  The  University,  Bradford  BD7  1DP 


Notice  to  Contributors  to  ‘The  Naturalist’ 

A manuscript  plus  disc  (WORD  format)  OR  two  manuscripts,  typed  double-spaced  on  one 
side  of  the  paper  only  with  margins  at  top  and  left-hand  at  least  2.5cm  wide,  should  be 
submitted.  Latin  names  of  genera  and  species,  but  nothing  else,  should  be  in  italics.  S.I. 
Units  should  be  used  wherever  possible.  Authors  must  ensure  that  their  references  are 
accurately  cited,  and  that  the  titles  of  the  journals  are  correctly  abbreviated.  Volumes  of 
The  Naturalist  for  the  years  1886  to  1975  have  been  retrospectively  numbered  1 1 to  100  to 
accord  with  numbering  before  and  after  this  period  (see  YNU  Bulletin  no.  3,  pp.  21-22 
1985);  please  cite  these  volume  numbers  in  all  references.  Table  and  text-figures  should  be 
prepared  on  separate  sheets  of  paper.  Drawings  and  graphs,  drawn  about  twice  the  linear 
size  they  are  to  appear,  should  be  in  jet-black  Indian  ink,  and  legends  should  not  be  written 
on  the  figures.  Photographic  illustrations,  normally  black  and  white,  will  be  considered  for 
inclusion.  Publishable  manuscripts  not  conforming  to  the  above  requirements  will  be 
returned  for  alteration. 

e-mail : m .r  .d  .seaward  @ bradford  .ac  .uk 


© Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union  — 2010 

Single  copies  may  be  made  of  single  articles  in  this  journal  provided  that  due  acknow- 
ledgement is  made  and  the  copies  are  for  non-profit  making  educational  or  private  use. 
Copying  of  more  than  one  article  or  multiple  copying  of  a single  article  is  forbidden  unless 
special  permission  has  been  obtained  from  the  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union.  Permission  is 
granted  for  the  use  of  brief  quotations  in  published  work  provided  that  acknowledgement 
of  the  source  is  clearly  stated,  but  the  use  of  substantial  sections  of  text  and  any  illustrative 
matter  requires  the  express  permission  of  the  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union. 


Registered  Office  (for  all  enquiries  and  correspondence): 

Mr  John  A.  Newbould,  Stonecroft,  3 Brookmead  Close,  Sutton  Poyntz,  Weymouth, 
Dorset  DT3  6RS  (tel:  01305-837384;  email:  john_newbould@btintemet.com) 

Subscriptions  and  Membership  changes  of  address  with  effect  from  1 May  2010. 

Membership  Officer,  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union,  c/o  NEYEDC,  St  William  College, 
5 College  Street,  York  YOl  7JF  01904  641631 
Email:  membership@ynu.org.uk 


Note  that  the  YNU  logo  used  on  the  cover  of  this  journal  is  a registered  trade  mark 
(no.  2431809)  and  its  use  by  other  organisations  requires  permission. 


The  Naturalist  and  Bulletin  are  issued  free  to  individual  members  of  the  Yorkshire 
Naturalists’  Union  and  to  Affiliated  Societies. 


Institutions  and  Subscribers  £32.00  (UK),  £36.00  (elsewhere) 


Registered  Charity  No.  224018 


A QUARTERLY  JOURNAL  OF  NATURAL  HISTORY  FOR  THE  NORTH  OF  ENGLAND 


Editor  M.  R.  D.  Seaward,  msc,  PhD,  dsc,fls, 
The  University,  Bradford  BD7  1DP 


Volume  135 
2010 


Published  by  the  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union 


WHITEFLIES  (HEMIPTERA:  ALEYRODIDAE) 
OF  WATSONIAN  YORKSHIRE 


3 


CHRIS  MALUMPHY 

The  Food  and  Environment  Research  Agency,  Sand  Hutton,  York  Y041  1LZ 
e-mail : chris  .malumphy @ fera .gsi  .gov.uk 

Abstract 

Collection  details  are  provided  for  1 1 species  of  Aleyrodidae  (eight  native  and  naturalised 
introductions,  one  introduced  species  established  on  indoor  plantings,  and  two  non- 
established  introductions  on  growing  plants)  recorded  in  Watsonian  Yorkshire.  Two  native 
species  ( Pealius  quercus  (Signoret))  and  Siphoninus  immaculatus  (Heeger))  and  one 
introduced  naturalized  species  (Aleurotuba  jelinekii  (Frauenfeld))  are  recorded  from  the 
region  for  the  first  time.  Siphoninus  immaculatus  is  reported  damaging  an  ornamental  ivy 
plant  for  the  first  time  in  Britain  and  cultivated  rose  is  recorded  as  a new  host  for  Aleyrodes 
lonicerae  Walker.  A list  of  six  non-native  species  that  have  been  intercepted  in  the  region 
by  the  plant  health  authorities  of  England  and  Wales  on  imported  plant  produce  is  also 
presented. 

Introduction 

Whiteflies  comprise  a single  family,  Aleyrodidae,  which  currently  contains  1556  species  in 
161  genera  (Martin  & Mound,  2007).  Fifty-six  species  occur  outdoors  in  Europe  and  the 
Mediterranean  basin  (Martin  et  al.,  2000).  All  whiteflies  are  phytophagous  and  several 
species  are  economically  important.  Feeding  by  the  immature  stages  reduces  plant  vigour 
by  depletion  of  the  plant  sap,  foliage  is  contaminated  with  eliminated  honey  dew  on  which 
black  sooty  mould  grows,  and  the  adults  of  a small  number  of  species  are  important  vectors 
of  plant  viruses. 

Harrison  (1915,  1916,  1917,  1917a,  1920,  1920a,  1931)  studied  the  whiteflies  of  the 
North  East  of  England  and  listed  four  native  or  naturalised  species  (i.e.,  an  introduced 
species  that  overwinters  outdoors)  in  Yorkshire  ( Aleurochiton  aceris  (Modeer),  Aleyrodes 
lonicerae  Walker,  Aleyrodes  proletella  (Linnaeus)  and  Tetralicia  ericae  Harrison).  Walsh 
(1918,  1920)  recorded  A.  lonicerae,  T.  ericae  and  ‘ Aleurochiton  avellanae ’ from  Yorkshire 
(the  specific  identity  of  the  latter  is  uncertain  and  is  discussed  below).  The  purpose  of  this 
communication  is  to  review  the  whiteflies  of  Watsonian  Yorkshire  (VCs  61  to  65),  based  on 
samples  collected  since  1997,  published  records  and  unpublished  data  held  by  The  Food 
and  Environment  Research  Agency  (Fera) . 

Methods 

Whitefly  samples  were  collected  on  woody  and  herbaceous  plants  growing  outdoors  and 
indoors  between  1997  and  2009,  mainly  by  the  author.  Puparia  were  slide-mounted 
following  standard  published  methods  (Martin,  1987)  and  deposited  at  Fera.  They  were 
identified  using  the  diagnostic  keys  provided  by  Martin  et  al.  (2000).  The  identity  of  some 
of  the  non-native  species  was  confirmed  by  Jon  Martin  of  the  Natural  History  Museum, 
London.  The  nomenclature  used  follows  Martin  and  Mound  (2007). 

Morphological  descriptions  and  illustrations  of  the  puparia  of  all  native/naturalised 
species  listed  below  are  provided  by  Martin  et  al.  (2000)  and  the  adults  of  the  majority  of 
the  species  are  described  by  Hulden  (1986).  The  host  and  distribution  data  is  obtained  from 
Martin  et  al.  (2000),  and  Mound  and  Halsey  (1978). 

Results 

Eleven  species  (8  native  and  naturalised  introductions,  1 introduced  species  established  on 
indoor  plantings  and  2 non-established  introductions  on  growing  plants)  of  Aleyrodidae  are 
recorded  here  for  Watsonian  Yorkshire.  Two  native  species  ( Pealius  quercus  (Signoret)  and 


Naturalist  135  (2010) 


4 


Whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae)  ofWatsonian  Yorkshire 

Siphoninus  immaculatus  (Heeger))  and  one  introduced  naturalized  species  ( Aleurotuba 
jelinekii  (Frauenfeld))  are  recorded  from  the  region  for  the  first  time. 

The  white  fly  species  have  been  divided  into  three  categories  below:  the  first  includes 
the  native  and  naturalized  species;  the  second,  non-native  species  established  under 
artificial  conditions  (and  occasionally  found  breeding  outdoors  in  the  summer  but  not 
overwintering  outdoors);  the  third,  includes  non-native  species  that  have  been  found 
breeding  on  imported  plants  but  which  are  not  known  to  have  become  naturalised  or 
established  anywhere  in  Britain.  The  author  collected  all  of  the  samples  recorded  under 
‘Collection  data’,  unless  stated  otherwise. 

For  the  sake  of  completeness,  6 non-native  species  that  have  been  intercepted  in  the 
region  by  the  plant  health  authorities  of  England  and  Wales  on  imported  plant  material  are 
listed  in  Appendix  1 . 

In  addition  to  the  whitefly  species  listed  below,  Walsh  (1920)  recorded  the  larvae  of 
‘ Aleurochiton  avellanae’  in  Raincliffe  and  Staintondale  on  Corylus  avellana,  in  August  and 
September  1920.  Aleurochiton  avellanae  (Signoret)  was  synonymised  with  Asterobemisia 
carpini  Koch  by  Mound  and  Halsey  (1978),  but  this  was  not  accepted  by  Zahradnik  (1989, 
1991)  who  considered  them  two  distinct  species.  The  species  avellanae  Signoret  has  also 
been  confused  with  P.  quercus  in  Britain,  for  example  by  Trehan  (1940)  (Mound,  1966; 
Mound  & Halsey,  1978;  Zahradnik,  1956).  As  both  A.  carpini  and  P.  quercus  occur  on 
Corylus  in  England  and  there  are  no  preserved  specimens  of  the  whitefly  collected  by 
Walsh  available  for  study  it  is  not  possible  to  be  certain  which  species  he  observed. 

Native  species  and  naturalised  introductions 

Aleurochiton  sp.  (Figures  1-2) 

Host  plants:  Acer  spp. 

Biology:  bivoltine;  overwinters  as  puparia  in  leaf  litter. 

Distribution:  Europe. 

Comments:  there  are  three  species  of  whitefly  that  feed  exclusively  on  Acer  spp.  in  Europe 
and  they  are  all  assigned  to  the  genus  Aleurochiton  (Martin  et  al.,  2000).  Harrison  (1916) 
recorded  A.  aceris  (Modeer)  in  great  numbers  on  maple  in  Gunnergate,  Middlesbrough.  He 
subsequently  republished  this  record,  adding  that  the  host  was  field  maple  (Acer 
campestris)  (Harrison,  1920a). 

Mound  (1966)  dismissed  this 
record,  as  he  assumed  it  was  based 
only  on  adults.  However,  although 
adult  whitefly  may  be  found  on 
non-host  species,  they  are  unlikely 
to  occur  in  ‘great  numbers’, 
particularly  on  a tree  where  the 
foliage  is  relatively  high.  Mound 
stated  that  the  Targe  size  and 
striking  appearance  of  the 
immature  instars  with  their  white 
dorsal  wax’  were  not  recorded  by 
Harrison,  proving  that  he  did  not 
see  puparia.  Aleurochiton  species 
in  Europe,  however,  are  bivoltine 
and  their  puparia  exhibit  distinct 
dimorphism:  only  the  mature 

winter  puparia  are  conspicuous 
(dark  with  a dense  coating  of  white  wax  on  the  dorsal  surface)  (Figure  1),  whereas  the 
summer  puparia  have  a pale,  translucent  cuticle  and  are  difficult  to  detect  (Figure  2)  (the 
present  author  observed  numerous  adult  A.  aceris  on  Acer  platanoides  trees  in  July  2008  in 


FIGURE  1.  Aleurochiton  aceris  dark,  waxy  winter 
puparium  on  Acer  platanoides . 


Whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae)  ofWatsonian  Yorkshire  5 

Sawbridge worth,  Hertfordshire,  but  found  it  difficult  to  find  a single  summer  pupal  case). 
Adult  Aleurochiton  are  only  active  for  a brief  period  in  the  spring  (when  the  dark,  waxy, 
overwintered  puparia  are  in  the  leaf  litter)  and  in  the  summer  (when  the  puparia  on  the 

foliage  are  inconspicuous).  The 
presence  of  A.  aceris  in  Britain  was 
not  confirmed  until  1976  (Martin, 
1978)  and  it  is  now  locally  common 
in  southern  England.  It  feeds  on 
A.  platanoides  and  is  widely 
distributed  across  Europe  (Martin  et 
al.,  2000).  Aleurochiton  acerinus 
Haupt  has  also  been  recorded  in 
southern  England  by  Dolling  & 
Martin  (1985)  on  A.  campestris.  It 
occurs  widely  in  southern  and 
central  Europe  (Martin  et  al.,  2000). 
Unfortunately  the  specific  identity 
of  the  Aleurochiton  recorded  in 
Yorkshire  by  Harrison  cannot  be 
verified,  as  Harrison  did  not  appear 
to  keep  any  voucher  specimens.  It 
would  not  be  surprising  if  A.  aceris 
was  found  to  be  present  in  the  north  of  England  as  it  occurs  widely  in  Scandinavia  and  the 
Baltic  region  (Malumphy  et  al.,  2009),  whereas  A.  acerinus  is  more  common  in  southern 
parts  of  Europe. 

Aleurotuba  jelinekii  (Frauenfeld,  1867)  - Viburnum  Whitefly  (Figures  3-4) 

Host  plants:  appears  to  be  mainly  restricted  to  Viburnum  tinus  in  Britain  but  on  the 
continent  it  is  also  recorded  on  Arbutus  unedo,  Arctostaphylos  sp.,  Myrtus  communis  and 
Viburnum  spp.. 

Biology:  univoltine;  flight  period  early  May  to  early  August;  overwinters  as  puparia. 
Distribution:  Europe  and  the  USA. 

Collection  data:  all  records  are  on  V.  tinus.  VC61,  Elvington,  24.ii.2008,  10.iii.2009, 
5.vi.2009  (pupal  cases  and  eggs) 

(leg.  S.  Reid)  (large  infestation). 

VC62,  Haxby,  7.iii.2009, 

20.iv.2009  (abundant,  wide- 
spread); Howsham,  ll.v.2009 
(abundant);  Sand  Hutton,  various 
dates  iii-viii.2009  (abundant, 
widespread;  adults  present  from 
beginning  of  May;  by  June  the 
new  plant  growth  was  covered  in 
thousands  of  adults  and  eggs; 
first  and  second  instars  present  at 
end  of  July);  Stockton-on-the- 
Forest,  24.iv.2009  (abundant, 
larvae),  27.vii.2009  (adults); 

Strensall,  22.iv.2009  (abundant, 
widespread);  York,  city  centre, 
ll.v.1997  (leg.  L.  MacLeod), 

23 .xi .2003,  3.iv.2006,  15.xi.2008,  18.vii.2009  (large  infestations,  widespread),  Clifton, 
7.iv.2009  (abundant),  Clifton  Moor,  9.iv.2009  (abundant,  widespread),  l.viii.2009  (first  and 
second  instars),  Homestead  park,  12.vii.2009  (abundant,  adults  and  pupal  cases); 


FIGURE  3 . Viburnum  tinus  leaf  with  large  infestation 
of  Aleurotuba  jelinekii 


FIGURE  2.  Aleurochiton  aceris  pale  summer 
puparium  on  Acer  platanoides 


6 


Whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae)  ofWatsonian  Yorkshire 

Wigginton,  9.iv.2009  (abundant,  wide- 
spread); Wigginton  Moor,  10.iv.2009 
(abundant).  VC  64,  York,  city  centre, 
14.iii.2009  (small  infestation),  Acomb, 
1 .iii.2009  (small  infestation),  Acomb 
wood,  9.V.2009  (large  infestation, 
puparia  and  adults) . 

Comments:  introduced  into  Britain 
in  about  1936  (Mound,  1962,  as 
Aleurotrachelus  jelinekii).  It  is  now 
very  common  and  widespread  in 
southern  England  (Andrew  Halstead, 
pers.  comm.  2009).  It  is  recorded  here 
for  the  first  time  from  Yorkshire  and  is 
Figure  4.  Aleurotuba  jelinekii  puparia  with  abundant  in  the  centre  of  York, 
dorsal  wax  tufts  frequently  occurring  in  very  large 

populations  smothering  the  undersides 
of  foliage  (Figure  3).  It  is  one  of  the  most  common  whiteflies  found  across  Europe  (Martin 
etal.,  2000). 

Aleyrodes  lonicerae  Walker,  1852  - Honeysuckle  or  Strawberry  Whitefly  (Figure  5) 

Host  plants:  broadly  polyphagous. 

Biology:  multivoltine  with  overlapping  generations;  adults  occur  throughout  the  year; 
overwinters  in  the  adult  stage. 

Distribution:  Europe  and  Iran. 

Collection  data:  VC61,  Allerthorpe  Common,  on  Lonicera  periclymenum,  25.vii.1998; 
Beverley,  plant  nursery,  Euphorbia  pulcherrima  (grown  indoors),  5.xi.l998,  from  the 
Netherlands,  various  dates  xii.2001  (Fera),  Lonicera  sp.,  10.ix.1998  (Fera);  Dunnington 
Common,  Rabbit  Warren,  L.  periclymenum,  30. vi. 2009  (adults,  eggs,  first  instars); 
Elstonwick,  Rubus  sp..  19.xi.2003  (leg. 

W.  Dolling)  (adults  and  wax  patches); 

Halsham,  Fragaria  x ananassa  grown  in 
a poly  tunnel,  13.x. 2000  (leg.  W. 

Dolling);  Hull,  Lonicera  sp.,  25 .ix .2007 
(leg.  T.  Prior)  (large  infestation,  all 
developmental  stages);  Skipwith 
Common,  L.  periclymenum,  2.viii.2009 
(sparse,  adults,  eggs,  first  instars).  VC62, 

Bossall,  west-belt  wood,  Rubus  fruticosa, 

21.iv.2009  (eggs);  Buttercrambe  Moor 
wood,  L.  periclymenum  and  R.  fruticosa, 

22.x  .2008  (several  vacated  pupal  cases 
and  parasitised  puparia),  21.iv.2009 
(adults,  eggs),  10.vi.2009  (abundant,  all 
stages);  Haxby,  Lonicera  nitida,  various 
dates  viii.2007  (abundant,  all  stages), 

L.  periclymenum,  various  dates  iii.- 
viii.2009  (abundant),  R.  fruticosa,  19.iv.2009  (eggs,  larvae);  Haxby  allotments,  F.  x 
ananassa,  31.vii.2009  (abundant,  adults,  eggs);  Haxby,  Westwoods,  Aegopodium 
podagraria,  31.vii.2009  (abundant,  all  developmental  stages);  Nunnington,  Meconopsis 
cambrica,  5.ix.2008  (leg.  R.  Hammon)  (adults,  eggs,  first  instars),  Rosa  sp.,  28. vi. 2009 
(pupal  cases  and  adults);  Sand  Hutton,  R.  fruticosa,  1 3 .iii.2009  (sparse),  Black  Dike 
Plantation,  R.  fruticosa,  19.xi.2008  (adults,  vacated  pupal  cases,  parasitised  puparia), 
5 .iii.2009  (adults,  eggs,  first  instars),  L.  periclymenum,  R.  fruticosa,  (adults,  eggs,  early 


FIGURE  5 . Aleyrodes  lonicerae  adult  with  one 
greyish  spot  on  each  forewing 


Whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae)  ofWatsonian  Yorkshire  7 

instars;  abundant),  Arctium  lappa  and  Centaurea  scabiosa  (adults  only,  A.  lappa  and  C. 
scabiosa  are  not  confirmed  hosts),  20.viii.2009;  Strensall,  R.  fruticosa,  29.ix.2008  (adults, 
vacated  pupal  cases;  adults  were  active,  making  short  flights  despite  an  ambient 
temperature  of  -1°C);  Strensall  Common,  L.  periclymenum,  16.vii.2009  (adults,  eggs). 
VC64,  Fountains  Abbey,  L.  periclymenum , 25.vii.2009  (eggs,  larvae);  York  city  centre,  R. 
fruticosa,  8.vii.2003  (sparse,  adults,  eggs). 

Comments:  the  puparia  of  A.  lonicerae  are  morphologically  very  similar  to  A.  proletella 
(Linnaeus)  and  one  of  the  main  characters  used  to  distinguish  between  them  (the  degree  of 
development  of  the  caudal  setae)  should  be  used  with  caution,  as  this  character  exhibits 
more  variation  in  both  species  than  reported  in  the  literature.  Several  specimens  should  be 
examined  and  an  average  character  state  used  for  identification  purposes.  The  adults, 
however,  are  easily  separated,  as  each  forewing  of  A.  lonicerae  bears  a single  grey  spot 
(Figure  5),  whereas  each  fore  wing  of  A.  proletella  bears  a pair  of  spots  (Figure  6). 
The  shape  of  the  aedeagus  also  differs  significantly  between  the  two  species  (Hulden,  1986). 

Harrison  (1915,  1920)  recorded  this  species  in  Gunnergate,  Nunthorpe,  and  near 
Stainton,  Middlesbrough,  on  Lonicera  sp.  He  subsequently  reported  that  it  was  extremely 
common  everywhere  in  North  Yorkshire  (Harrison,  1931).  Walsh  (1920)  recorded  it  in 
Haybum  Wyke,  Raincliffe  Woods  and  Staintondale,  on  Lonicera  sp.  during  August  and 
September  1920.  It  is  an  occasional  pest  of  blackberry  and  strawberry  in  Britain  (Alford, 
2007).  Cultivated  rose  is  recorded  here  as  a new  host  for  this  species. 

Aleyrodes proletella  (Linnaeus,  1758)  - Cabbage  Whitefly  (Figure  6) 

Host  plants:  broadly  polyphagous. 

Biology:  four  or  five  overlapping  generations  each  year;  adults  occur  throughout  the  year; 
overwinters  in  the  adult  stage. 

Distribution:  Europe,  Iran,  Africa,  Hong  Kong,  New  Zealand,  Brazil,  Mexico,  Bermuda, 
Puerto  Rico  and  the  Virgin  Islands. 

Collection  data:  VC61,  Beverley,  plant  nursery,  on  Euphorbia  pulcherrima  (grown 
indoors),  l.ix.2002,  Hebe  sp.  (grown 
indoors),  6.viii.2003  (Fera);  Elstronwick, 

Brassica  oleracea  kale,  l.xi.1998  (leg. 

W.  Dolling)  (adults);  Stamford  Bridge, 
allotments,  B.  oleracea,  23.vii.2009 
(adults,  eggs,  larvae).  VC62,  Burythorpe, 

B.  oleracea,  20.vii.2009  (leg.  J.  Ostoja- 
Starzewski);  Haxby  allotments,  B. 
oleracea,  31.vii.2009  (adults,  eggs, 
larvae);  Nunnington,  B.  oleracea, 

20.viii.2003,  2 1 .viii.2008  (leg.  R. 

Hammon)  (abundant);  Stockton-on-the- 
Forest,  herbaceous  plant,  24.iv.2009 
(abundant,  adults),  Chelidonium  majus, 

Sonchus  arvensis  and  other  herbaceous 
plants,  25.vii.2009,  (abundant,  hundreds 
of  adults,  eggs);  York,  city  centre, 

Tropaeolum  sp.,  5.vii.2009  (leg.  A. 

Korycinska)  (adults  only,  Tropaeolum  is 
not  confirmed  as  a host),  Clifton  allotments,  B.  oleracea,  l.viii.2009  (spares,  adults,  eggs). 
VC64,  Knaresborough,  plant  nursery,  E.  pulcherrima  (grown  indoors),  from  the 
Netherlands,  21.xi.2004  (Fera);  Leeds,  B.  oleracea  kale,  27.viii.1997  (leg.  T.  Prior) 
(abundant);  York,  Acomb,  B.  oleraceae,  8.vii.2001  (abundant)  (leg.  R.  Natt). 

Comments:  Harrison  (1915,  1916)  recorded  this  species  in  Great  Ayton,  on  C.  majus.  It  is  a 
frequent  pest  of  Brassica  spp.  in  Britain. 


FIGURE  6.  Aleyrodes  proletella  adult  with  two 
greyish  spots  on  each  forewing 


8 Whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae)  ofWatsonian  Yorkshire 

Bemisia  afer  (Priesner  & Hosny,  1934) 

Host  plants:  broadly  polyphagous  on  woody  plants. 

Biology:  not  recorded  in  Britain  but  suspected  to  be  multivoltine  if  climatic  conditions  are 
suitable. 

Distribution:  occurs  throughout  the  warmer  regions  of  the  World  and  is  widespread  in  the 
Mediterranean. 

Collection  data:  VC64,  Huddersfield,  plant  nursery,  on  L.  nobilis  from  Italy,  ll.x.2000 
(Fera);  York  city  centre,  L.  nobilis  (in  sheltered  walled  private  garden  on  a well  established 
tree  with  no  recent  import  connection)  23 .vi .2003,  8.vii.2003  (sparse);  Wetherby,  plant 
nursery,  L.  nobilis  from  Belgium  (probably  originated  in  Sicily),  various  dates  between 
ix.1999  to  i.2001  (Malumphy,  2003). 

Comments:  B.  afer  has  been  introduced  and  become  naturalised  in  Gloucestershire  and 
Greater  London  (Halstead,  1981,  as  B.  hancocki  (Corbett);  Malumphy,  2003)  but  in 
England  has  only  been  found  breeding  outdoors  on  L.  nobilis. 

Pealius  quercus  (Signoret,  1868) 

Host  plants:  deciduous  Betulaceae  and  Fagaceae. 

Biology:  univoltine;  flight  period  May  and  June;  overwinters  as  puparia  in  the  leaf  litter. 
Distribution:  north  and  central  Europe. 

Collection  data:  VC64,  Gormire  Lake,  on  Quercus  robur,  27 .v.  1997  (adult  and  early  larval 
instar).  Not  found  in  the  same  location  in  May  2009. 

Comments:  W.  Dolling  observed  adult  whitefly  without  any  wing  markings  on  oak  in  Haw 
Park,  Wakefield,  17.V.2003,  that  were  highly  likely  to  be  P.  quercus.  This  species  is 
widespread  and  locally  abundant  in  England  and  parts  of  Scotland  (Mound,  1966).  This  is 
the  first  time  that  it  has  been  recorded  in  Yorkshire. 


Siphoninus  immaculatus  (Heeger,  1 856)  - Ivy  Whitefly  (Figures  7-8) 

Host  plants:  Hedera  helix  in  Britain;  also  recorded  on  H.  canariensis  on  the  continent. 
Biology:  univoltine;  flight  period  from  June  to  August;  overwinters  as  first  instars. 
Distribution:  central  and  northern  Europe,  and  Iran. 

Collection  data:  in  all  cases  it  was  found  on  H.  helix  growing  against  a solid  surface,  for 
example  brick  or  stonewalls  or  a wooden  fence,  usually  with  a southerly  aspect.  VC61, 
Elstronwick,  26.vi.2003  (leg. 

W.  Dolling)  (adults,  puparia, 
eggs).  VC62,  Haxby,  31.vii.2009 
(mature  puparia,  many  parasitized, 
foliage  covered  in  sooty  mould); 

Howsham,  ll.v.2009  (few  first 
instars,  many  second  and  third 
instars,  old  vacated  pupal  cases 
and  parasitized  puparia), 

21.V.2009  (many  third  instars  and 
a few  teneral  puparia),  15.vi.2009 
(mature  puparia),  25  .vi  .2009 
(adult  females  and  eggs);  Castle 
Howard,  2.iv.2009  (first  and 
second  instars).  VC64,  Fountains 
Abbey,  on  a variegated  plant, 

29.iii.2009  (first  instars,  vacated 
pupal  cases;  foliage  covered  in 
honey  dew  and  black  sooty 
moulds  and  suffering  from  necrosis  and  premature  leaf  drop;  vacated  Syrphidae  puparia 
present),  27 .vi. 2009  (thousands  of  adults  and  vacated  pupal  cases,  eggs,  teneral  and  mature 
puparia;  puparia  dorsal  pigmentation  varied  from  being  absent,  to  a cepahalic  and  posterior 


FIGURE  7.  Hedera  helix  leaf  covered  in  honeydew 
and  mould  due  to  a large  infestation  of  Siphoninus 
immaculatus 


Whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae)  ofWatsonian  Yorkshire  9 

dark  spot,  to  a broad  longitudinal  band;  sex  ratio  1 male  to  4.4  females  (n  = 113);  many 
adults  were  caught  in  spiders  webs  but  were  not  seen  being  eaten  by  spiders),  25.vii.2009 
(abundant,  hundreds  of  adults, 
thousands  of  eggs,  most  laid  on 
leaves  that  were  already  heavily 
infested  with  whitefly;  three 
predatory  cecidomyid  larvae  present 
among  the  eggs;  several  puparia 
contained  a single  hymenopterous 
parasitoid  larva  or  pupa) . 

Comments:  occurs  widely  in 

continental  Europe  and  as  far  north 
as  Sweden  (Gertsson,  1987;  Martin 
et  al.,  2000).  It  is  infrequent  in 
southern  England  (Mound,  1966). 

This  is  the  first  time  that  it  has  been 
recorded  in  Yorkshire  and  appears 
to  be  the  most  northerly  published 
record  in  Britain.  This  is  also  the 
first  occasion  in  Britain  that  it  is  reported  causing  damage  to  its  host  plant. 

Tetralicia  ericae  Harrison,  1917  - Cross-leaved  Heather  Whitefly 
Host  plants:  Erica  tetralix  in  England;  also  E.  carnea  on  the  continent. 

Biology:  univoltine;  flight  period  May;  overwinters  as  third  instars. 

Distribution:  Europe  and  Iran. 

Collection  data:  VC62,  Strensall  Common,  on  Erica  tetralix,  29 .vi.  1997  (single  puparium). 
Not  found  in  2007-9  despite  extensive  searching  although  sheep  had  heavily  grazed  the 
heather  plants. 

Comments:  Harrison  (1917,  1917a,  1920a)  originally  described  this  species  from 
specimens  collected  on  E.  tetralix  at  Waldridge  Fell,  Durham  and  subsequently  recorded  it 
from  Skip  with  Common.  G.B.  Walsh  and  W.J.  Fordham  found  it  on  every  tuft  of  Erica  at 
Skipwith  Common  on  1 August  1918  (Walsh,  1918).  It  has  also  been  recorded  at 
Middlesbrough  (1917)  (Bink-Moenen,  1989),  and  Hatfield  Moor  (1992)  and  Thome  Moor 
(1995)  (Skidmore,  2006).  It  occurs  widely  in  England  from  the  south  coast  as  far  north  as 
Northumberland  (Mound,  1966)  but  is  rarely  recorded.  It  also  occurs  widely  in  continental 
Europe  as  far  north  as  Sweden  (Gertsson,  1987;  Martin  et  al.,  2000). 

Introduced  species  established  on  indoor  plantings 

Trialeurodes  vaporariorum  (Westwood,  1856)  - Glasshouse  Whitefly 
Host  plants:  broadly  polyphagous. 

Biology:  multivoltine  with  overlapping  generations. 

Distribution:  cosmopolitan. 

Collection  data:  the  data  has  been  summarised  due  to  the  large  number  of  records,  mostly 
from  Fera;  all  are  on  indoor  plantings  either  in  plant  nurseries,  private  premises  or 
laboratory  glasshouses.  VC61:  Beverley,  Halsham  and  Hull,  on  Ajuga  reptans  from  the 
Netherlands,  2008 ,Asclepias  sp.  from  the  Netherlands,  2000,  Brachychiton  sp.  from  Israel, 
2000,  Datura  sp.  from  Israel,  2005,  Euphorbia  pulcherrima,  1997-2001,  from  Germany, 
2003,  2007,  Portugal,  1998,  the  Netherlands,  2001-2006,  and  Sweden,  2008,  Fuchsia  sp., 
1997,  Hardenbergia  violacea  from  the  Netherlands,  2004,  Hedera  sp.  from  the 
Netherlands,  2002,  2008 , Hypericum  androsaemum  from  the  Netherlands,  2008,  Hypoestes 
sp.  from  the  Netherlands,  2001,  Lycopersicon  esculentum,  13.x .2000  (leg.  W.  Dolling), 
Mentha  sp.  from  Israel,  2001,  Pelargonium  sp.  from  Israel,  1997,  Pyracantha  sp.,  2003, 
Verbascum  sp.,  2002,  and  Zelkova  sp.  from  China,  1999.  VC62,  Sand  Hutton,  on  Borago 


FIGURE  8.  Electron  micrograph  of  a Siphoninus 
immaculatus  pupal  case  showing  the  dorsal 
siphons 


10 


Whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae)  ofWatsonian  Yorkshire 


officinalis,  2003,  Calendula  sp.,  2003,  Camelina  sp.,  2003,  Cannabis  sativa,  2008, 
Chrysanthemum  sp.,  2003,  2007,  Fragaria  sp.,  2008,  Lunaria  sp.,  2003  and  Urtica  dioica, 
2002.  VC64,  Leeds,  Richmond,  Wakefield  and  Wetherby,  on  Aster  sp.  from  Colombia, 
1996,  Lantana  sp.  from  Italy,  1996,  Lysimachia  sp.  from  Israel  1996,  Mentha  sp.  from 
Israel,  2001,  Mrytus  communis  from  unknown  origin,  2008,  Origanum  vulgare  from  Israel, 
2001,  Pelagonium  sp.,  2009,  Phyla  sp.  from  Israel,  2007,  Rosmarinus  officinalis  from 
Israel,  2003,  Salvia  officinalis  from  Israel,  2002,  and  Urtica  sp.,  2001 . 

Comments:  growing  plants  imported  into  England  and  Wales  are  routinely  inspected 
shortly  after  arrival  by  the  Plant  Health  and  Seeds  Inspectorate  (PHSI) . The  countries  listed 
above  refer  to  the  origin  of  the  plants  that  in  most  cases  are  the  likely  source  of  the 
whiteflies.  However,  it  is  possible  that  some  of  the  plants  became  infested  after  arrival  in 
Britain,  as  T.  vaporariorum  is  very  common  throughout  the  country  in  commercial  and 
private  ornamental  indoor  plantings.  It  also  breeds  outdoors  during  the  summer,  most 
frequently  in  southern  England  and  in  large  urban  areas.  Trialeurodes  vaporariorum  is 
probably  much  more  common  and  widespread  in  Yorkshire  than  the  records  here  indicate. 
It  is  under-recorded  because  it  is  so  ubiquitous. 

Non-established  incursions 

Bemisia  tabaci  (Gennadius,  1889)  - Tobacco  Whitefly 
Host  plants:  broadly  polyphagous. 

Distribution:  cosmopolitan. 

Collection  data:  the  tobacco  whitefly  has  been  found  on  imported  plants  and  plant  material 
at  a botanical  garden  and  at  plant  nurseries  distributed  throughout  the  region  (specific 
locations  are  not  given  for  reasons  of  commercial  confidentiality  as  this  is  a regulated  pest). 
On  Abutilon  sp.,  Ajuga  reptans,  Argyranthemum  sp.,  Asclepias  sp.,  Begonia  sp., 
Brugmansia  sp..  Cassia  sp.,  Crossandra  sp.,  Diascia  sp..  Euphorbia  amygdaloides,  E. 
pulcherrima,  Hardenbergia  violacea,  Hibiscus  rosa-sinensis,  Hibiscus  sp.,  Gerber  a sp., 
Jatropha  sp.,  Lantana  camara.  Origanum  vulgare,  Pelargonium  sp..  Salvia  officinalis, 
Solidaster  sp.,  Solanum  sp.,  Rosmarinus  officinalis.  Thymus  sp.,  Trachelium  sp.,  Verbena 
sp.  and  Zelkova  sp.  imported  from  Belgium,  Brazil,  Canary  Islands,  China,  Denmark, 
Germany,  Israel,  Netherlands,  Portugal,  Spain  and  Sweden. 

Comments:  this  species  is  listed  in  the  plant  health  legislation  of  the  European  Union.  All 
interceptions  and  incursions  of  B.  tabaci  have  been,  or  are  being,  eradicated  by  Fera.  Any 
suspected  cases  of  B.  tabaci  must  be  reported  to  the  PHSI. 

Dialeurodes  citri  (Ashmead,  1885)  - Citrus  Whitefly 

Host  plants:  broadly  polyphagous  but  exhibits  a strong  preference  for  citrus. 

Distribution:  Central  and  North  America,  Caribbean,  southern  Europe,  Asia,  and  Pacific. 
Collection  data:  VC61,  plant  nurseries,  Ligustrum  chinensis  penjing  (grown  indoors)  from 
China,  various  dates  xi.2000  (Fera). 

Comments:  this  species  has  been  found  on  several  occasions  at  commercial  nurseries  on 
citrus  plants  imported  from  the  Mediterranean  and  on  penjing  from  China  (Fera). 

Discussion 

Fifteen  native  and  naturalised  species  of  whiteflies  occur  in  Britain  (Burckhardt,  2007; 
Malumphy,  2003,  2005;  Martin  et  al.,  2000)  of  which  half  have  been  recorded  in 
Watsonian  Yorkshire.  Two  native  species,  Pealius  quercus  and  Siphoninus  immaculatus, 
and  one  naturalized  species,  Aleurotuba  jelinekii,  are  recorded  from  the  region  for  the  first 
time.  The  whiteflies  ofWatsonian  Yorkshire,  however,  remain  inadequately  studied  and  it 
is  probable  that  other  species  will  be  found  to  occur  in  the  region.  It  would  be  interesting  to 
confirm  the  presence  and  identity  of  the  Aleurochiton  species  recorded  by  Harrison  (1916, 
1920,  1920a)  and  the  identity  of  the  whitefly  observed  by  Walsh  (1920)  on  hazel. 

Siphoninus  immaculatus  was  observed  damaging  a large  variegated  ivy  plant  growing 


11 


Whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae)  ofWatsonian  Yorkshire 

against  a wall  at  Fountains  Abbey  (Figure  7).  This  species  has  not  been  reported  causing 
plant  damage  in  Britain  before  (Andrew  Halstead,  pers.  com.,  2009).  The  symptoms 
exhibited  by  the  plant  were  typical  of  those  caused  by  sap-feeding  bugs.  The  upper 
surfaces  of  the  leaves  growing  near  the  base  of  the  plant  were  covered  in  sooty  moulds 
growing  on  honey  dew  eliminated  by  the  whitefly  larvae.  The  undersurfaces  of  the  leaves 
were  covered  in  whitefly  exuviae,  pupal  cases  and  waxy  deposits.  The  most  heavily 
infested  leaves  were  crinkled,  showed  signs  of  necrosis  and  were  dropped  prematurely. 
Only  a single  plant  was  infested  while  other  ivy  plants  growing  nearby  were  completely 
free  from  the  pest. 

There  appears  to  have  been  an  increase  in  the  abundance  and  distribution  of  A.  jelinekii 
in  and  around  York  during  the  last  decade;  for  example,  only  a single  population  of  A. 
jelinekii  was  recorded  in  York  in  1997,  yet  by  2008-9  it  was  very  common  throughout  the 
centre  of  York,  frequently  occurring  in  very  large  populations  smothering  the  undersides  of 
Viburnum  tinus  foliage  (Figure  3).  It  was  also  found  in  Elvington,  Haxby,  Howsham,  Sand 
Hutton,  Strensall  and  Wigginton  for  the  first  time.  The  puparia  of  A.  jelinekii  are 
conspicuous,  being  black  with  white  wax  tufts  (Figure  4),  and  it  is  unlikely  that  it  was 
simply  over-looked  previously.  This  is  a thermophilic  species  and  its  increase  in  abundance 
and  distribution  may  be  in  response  to  climate  change. 

Bemisia  afer  appears  to  have  an  exceptionally  wide  climatic  tolerance,  ranging  from 
tropical  Africa,  through  the  Mediterranean  and  even  over- wintering  outdoors  in  the  centre 
of  York.  It  is  a broadly  polyhagous  species  but  has  only  been  found  on  L.  nobilis  when 
breeding  outdoors  in  Britain. 

The  most  common  whiteflies  in  Yorkshire  are  Aleyrodes  lonicerae  on  Lonicera  and 
Rubus\  Aleyrodes  proletella  on  Brassica\  and  A.  jelinekii  on  Viburnum.  All  three  of  these 
species  frequently  occur  in  enormous  populations  that  can  be  damaging  to  their  hosts 
(covering  the  foliage  with  honey  dew  on  which  sooty  moulds  grow).  Aleyrodes  lonicerae 
was  found  to  be  breeding  on  cultivated  rose  for  the  first  time  although  it  was  not  observed 
causing  any  damage  to  the  host  plant.  Trialeurodes  vapor ariorum  is  very  common  on 
indoor  plantings  and  frequently  found  in  large  numbers. 

Any  finding  of  a suspected  non-native  whitefly  in  England  and  Wales  should  be 
reported  to  the  local  PHSI  office  or  to  PHSI  headquarters,  Sand  Hutton,  York  (Tel.  01904- 
465625,  Fax.  01904-465628). 

Acknowledgements 

I would  like  to  express  my  sincere  gratitude  to  Bill  Dolling  for  allowing  me  to  include  his 
collection  data  and  providing  me  with  several  key  references.  I would  also  like  to  thank 
Roger  Hammon,  Anastasia  Korycinska,  Louise  MacLeod,  Richard  Natt,  Tom  Prior,  Sharon 
Reid  and  Joe  Ostoja-Starzewski  for  collecting  samples  of  whiteflies. 

References 

Alford,  D.V.  (2007)  Pests  of  Fruit  Crops.  A Colour  Handbook.  Mansion  Publishing, 
London. 

Bink-Moenen,  R.M.  (1989)  A new  species  and  new  records  of  European  whiteflies 
(Homoptera:  Aleyrodidae)  from  heathers  ( Erica  spp.).  Entomol.  Gaz.  40:  173-181. 
Burckhardt,  D.  (2007)  Hemiptera,  Aleyrodidae.  In:  Burkhardt,  D.  (ed.)  Fauna  Europaea. 

Version  1.1.  [Available  online  at  http://www.fauneur.org  ] 

Dolling,  W.R.  and  Martin,  J.H.  (1985)  Aleurochiton  acerinus  Haupt,  a maple-feeding 
whitefly  (Horn,  Aleyrodidae)  new  to  Britain.  Entomol.  Mon.  Mag.  121:  143-144. 
Gertsson,  C.A.  (1987)  Den  svenska  mjollusfaunan.  Entomol.  Tidskr.  108:  85-91. 

Halstead,  AJ.  (1981)  A whitefly  pest  of  sweet  bay.  Plant  Pathol . 30:  123. 

Harrison,  J.W.H.  (1915)  Notes  and  records.  Aleyrodidae.  Snowy  winged  flies.  Vasculum  2: 
57. 

Harrison,  J.W.H.  (1916)  Coccidae  and  Aleyrodidae  in  Northumberland,  Durham  and  north- 
east Yorkshire.  Entomologist  49:  172-174. 


1 2 Whiteflies  ( Hemiptera : Aleyrodidae ) of  Watsonian  Yorkshire 

Harrison,  J.W.H.  (1917)  A new  species  and  genus  of  Aleyrodidae  from  Durham.  Vasculum 
3:  60-62. 

Harrison,  J.W.H.  (1917a)  New  and  rare  Homoptera  in  the  Northern  Counties.  Entomologist 
50;  169-171. 

Harrison,  J.W.H.  (1920)  Notes  and  records.  Aleyrodidae.  Vasculum  6:  59. 

Harrison,  J.W.H.  (1920a)  New  and  rare  British  Aleurodidae.  Entomologist  53:  255-257. 

Harrison,  J.W.H.  (1931)  Some  observations  on  Aleurodidae.  Entomologist’s  Rec.  J.  Var.  43: 
84-86. 

Hulden,  L.  (1986)  The  whiteflies  (Homoptera,  Aleyrodidae)  and  their  parasites  in  Finland. 
Notul.  ent.  66:  1-40. 

Malumphy,  C.  (2003)  The  status  of  Bemisia  afer  (Priesner  & Hosny)  in  Britain 
(Homoptera:  Aleyrodidae).  Entomol.  Gaz.  54:  191-196. 

Malumphy,  C.  (2005)  The  Neotropical  solanum  whitefly,  Aleurotrachelus  trachoides 
(Back)  (Hem.,  Aleyrodidae),  intercepted  in  the  UK  on  sweet  potato  leaves  imported 
from  Gambia.  Entomol.  Mon.  Mag.  141:  94. 

Malumphy,  C.,  Ostrauskas,  H.  and  Pye,  D.  2009.  A faunistic  review  of  whiteflies 
(Hemiptera,  Aleyrodidae)  of  Lithuania.  Acta  zool.  litu.  19:  49-57. 

Martin,  J.H.  (1978)  Aleurochiton  complanatus  (Baerensprung)  (Aleyrodidae)  - 
confirmation  of  occurrence  in  Britain.  Entomol.  Mon.  Mag.  113:  7. 

Martin,  J.H.  (1987)  An  identification  guide  to  common  whitefly  pest  species  of  the  world 
(Homoptera,  Aleyrodidae).  Trop.  Pest  Managmt  33:  298-322. 

Martin,  J.H.,  Misfud,  D.  and  Rapisarda,  C.  (2000)  The  whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae) 
of  Europe  and  the  Mediterranean.  Bull.  Entomol.  Res.  90:  407-448. 

Martin,  J.H.  and  Mound,  L.A.  (2007)  An  annotated  check  list  of  the  world’s  Aleyrodidae 
(Insecta:  Hemiptera:  Stemorrhyncha).  Zootaxa  1492:  1-84. 

Mound,  L.A.  (1962)  Aleurotrachelus  jelinekii  (Frauen.)  (Homoptera,  Aleyrodidae),  in 
Southern  England.  Entomol.  Mon.  Mag.  97:  196-197, 

Mound,  L.A.  (1966)  A revision  of  the  British  Aleyrodidae  (Hemiptera:  Homoptera).  Bull. 
Br.  Mus.  (Nat.  Hist.)  ent.  17:  399-428. 

Mound,  L.A.  and  Halsey,  S.H.  (1978)  Whitefly  of  the  World.  A Systematic  Catalogue  of  the 
Aleyrodidae  ( Homoptera ) with  Host  Plant  and  Natural  Enemy  Data.  British  Museum 
(Natural  History),  London  / John  Wiley,  Chichester. 

Skidmore,  P.  (2006)  An  inventory  of  the  invertebrates  of  Thome  and  Hatfield  Moors. 
Thorne  & Hatfield  Moors  Monographs  2:  1-162. 

Trehan,  K.N.  (1940)  Studies  on  the  British  Whiteflies  (Homoptera  - Aleyrodidae).  Trans. 
R.  Entomol.  Soc.  Lond.  90:  575-616. 

Walsh,  G.B.  (1918)  Field  Notes,  Entomology,  Hemiptera-Homoptera  in  East  Yorkshire. 
Naturalist  43:  302. 

Walsh,  G.B.  1920.  Field  Notes,  New  Scarborough  Hemiptera.  Naturalist  45:  328. 

Zahradnik,  J.  (1956)  Trois  nouvelles  especes  des  aleyrodides  pour  la  faune  tchecoslovaque. 
Sb.faun.  Praci  Entomol.  Odd.  Nar.  Mus.  Praze  1:  43-45. 

Zahradnik,  J.  (1989)  La  revision  des  aleurodes  des  pays  Tcheques  (Stemorrhyncha: 
Aleyrodinea)  III.  Acta  Univ.  Carol.  31:  407-443. 

Zahradnik,  J.  (1991)  Taxonomisches  und  Faunistisches  iiber  europaische  Mottenlaiise 
(Aleyrodinea).  Acta  Univ.  Carol.  35:  111-118. 

Appendix  1. 

Non-native  whiteflies  intercepted  on  imported  plant  produce  in  Yorkshire. 

The  six  non-native  whitefly  species  listed  below  do  not  occur  anywhere  in  Britain  and  are 
unlikely  to  survive  for  long  on  imported  produce.  Most  of  them  were  actually  found  on 
foliage  used  for  packing,  rather  than  directly  on  the  plant  produce  itself. 

Aleuroclava  bifurcata  (Corbett,  1933) 

Interception  data:  VC64,  Bradford,  Dimocarpus  longan  foliage  used  for  packing  longan 
fruit,  from  Thailand,  2.x .2000  (Fera) 


13 


Whiteflies  (Hemiptera:  Aleyrodidae)  of  Watsonian  Yorkshire 

Aleuroclava  psidii  (Singh,  1931) 

Interception  data:  VC64,  Bradford,  Psidium  guajava  foliage  used  for  packing  guava  fruit, 
from  India,  9.ix.l999  (Fera). 

Aleurodicus  dispersus  Russell,  1965  - Spiralling  Whitefly 

Interception  data:  VC64,  Bradford,  Mangifera  indica  foliage  attached  to  mango  fruit,  from 
Ghana,  6.xi.l996  (Fera). 

Crenidorsum  sp. 

Interception  data:  VC64,  Bradford,  Dimocarpus  longan  foliage  used  for  packing  longan 
fruit,  from  Thailand,  2.x .2000  (Fera). 

Pealius  misrae  Singh,  1931 

Interception  data:  VC64,  Bradford,  Psidium  guajava  foliage  used  for  packing  guava  fruit, 
from  India,  9.ix.l999  (Fera). 

Trialeurodes  lauri  (Signoret,  1882) 

Interception  data:  VC61 , Beverley,  Arbutus  unedo  foliage  from  Turkey,  14.xii.2002  (Fera). 


BOOK  REVIEWS 

Darwin  in  Ilkley  by  Mike  Dixon  and  Gregory  Radick.  Pp.  127,  with  numerous  b/w 
illustrations.  The  History  Press,  Stroud.  2009.  £12.99,  softback. 

Darwin’s  stay  in  Ilkley  occurred  at  a momentous  period  in  his  life.  The  pressure  of  work 
was  getting  to  him  and  he  needed  a break  - but  why  take  it  at  a time  when  the  last  of  the 
proofs  of  his  monumental  On  the  Origin  of  Species  had  yet  to  arrive  and  it  was  about  to  be 
published?  Was  Darwin  genuinely  ill  or  did  he  suffer  from  hypochondria?  Recent  research 
on  the  numerous  symptoms  (abdominal  pains,  nausea  and  vomiting)  which  he  displayed 
suggest  that  he  may  have  suffered  from  lactose  intolerance,  and  the  other  symptoms 
(depression  and  anxiety)  he  had  developed  over  the  years  can  be  described  as  a 
“psychological  background”. 

Debilitated  yet  again,  Darwin  could  not  face  such  pressure.  He  needed  a bolt-hole  and 
a cure.  He  settled  for  a new  hydrotherapy  establishment,  Wells  House,  on  the  edge  of  Ilkley 
Moor.  The  water  had  no  chemical  properties;  it  was  merely  pure  and  cold  (4°C  in  both 
summer  and  winter),  and  thereby  suitable  for  both  drinking  and  bathing.  Wells  House  was 
filled  with  uncongenial  patients,  mainly  from  the  upper-classes,  suffering  from  a wide 
spectrum  of  complaints  ranging  from  lameness  to  neurosis. 

The  Origin  of  Species  was  launched  whilst  Darwin  was  at  Ilkley.  It  was  an  immediate 
success,  the  first  printing  selling  out  before  publication.  The  publisher  wanted  an 
immediate  reprint  with  corrections;  a second  edition  duly  appeared  only  six  weeks  later. 
Darwin  left  Wells  House  to  return  home  on  7 December,  having  stayed  at  Ilkley  for  nine 
weeks.  In  his  time  at  Ilkley  he  not  only  saw  his  most  famous  book  published,  and  was 
busily  engaged  on  amendments  for  a second  edition,  but  he  was  also  deeply  involved  in 
correspondence,  which  included  carefully  constructing  individual  letters  of  explanation  to 
accompany  the  complimentary  copies  of  his  book  he  sent  out  to  many  people,  responding 
in  detail  to  their  views,  and  particularly  their  praise.  Fortunately,  he  was  also  in  Ilkley  when 
the  storm  broke  out  over  his  book. 

These  and  many  other  fascinating  topics  are  covered  in  this  delightfully  illustrated 
book  which  not  only  provides  diagnoses  and  analyses  of  Darwin’s  supposed  ailments,  but 
also  a detailed  picture  of  the  ambience  generated  by  Wells  House  and  the  wide  range  of 
treatments  administered  to  its  patients.  Strongly  recommended,  not  only  to  Yorkshire 
readers  and  Darwin  enthusiasts,  but  also  to  those  interested  in  the  19th  century,  particularly 
its  medical  history. 


MRDS 


14 


Book  reviews 


Fumitories  of  Britain  and  Ireland  by  Rose  J.  Murphy.  Pp.  vi  + 121,  with  descriptions, 
line  drawings,  photographs  and  maps  showing  the  distribution  in  Britain  and  Ireland  of  all 
10  Fumaria  species,  plus  four  hybrids  and  two  casuals;  also  contains  a detailed  section  on 
plant  characters  important  for  identification,  glossary  and  summary  of  vice-counties  where 
Fumaria  spp.  have  been  recorded.  Botanical  Society  of  the  British  Isles  Handbook  No  12. 
2009.  £12.50  (paperback)  plus  p.  & p.,  available  from  Summerfield  Books,  3 Phoenix  Park, 
Skelton,  Penrith,  Cumbria  CA11  9SD. 

We  are  all  aware  of  the  critical  and  difficult  botanical  genera  including  Rubus,  Hieracium, 
Taraxacum,  Euphrasia  and  Alchemilla , and  various  other  publications  have  dealt  in  whole 
or  in  part  with  these  groups.  The  present  volume  has  been  accepted  by  the  BSBI 
Publications  Committee  as  the  first  in  a series  of  mini-handbooks  describing  small  genera 
that  are  difficult  to  identify. 

In  a small  genus  of  only  10  British  species,  most  botanists  are  readily  familiar  only 
with  common  fumitory  ( Fumaria  officinalis ),  and  several  of  the  others  are  indeed  rare  and 
local.  This  little  handbook  deals  in  great  detail  with  this  small  group,  providing,  firstly,  a 
comprehensive  dichotomous  key  to  the  species  and  subspecies,  and  secondly,  a more 
rigorous  extended  key  which  additionally  separates  out  varieties  and  forms  of  each  species. 
The  individual  species  accounts  are  clear  and  unambiguous,  written  in  language  the  non- 
specialist can  understand,  and  are  accompanied  by  stunning  line  drawings  and  excellent 
photographic  images,  which  show  flower  parts,  sepals,  fruits  and  other  critical  or  important 
characters  with  pin-sharp  accuracy.  More  general  habitat  shots  or  photos  of  the  whole  plant 
are  also  included.  The  book  also  contains  a generous  bibliography  and  a full  index,  giving 
synonymy  where  applicable.  The  whole  topic  has  been  thoroughly  researched  and  there  is 
virtually  nothing  that  one  can  quibble  with.  The  author  has  obviously  made  a painstaking 
study  of  the  genus  and  is  to  be  congratulated  on  producing  a comprehensive  and  lucid 
account.  This  is  a book  that  the  non-specialist  botanist  can  pick  up  with  confidence  and 
tackle  a fumitory  which  is  unknown  to  him.  It  is  a valuable  addition  to  one’s  bookshelf  and 
I recommend  it  to  all  who  are  interested  in  the  genus. 

GTDW 

The  Orchids  of  Ireland  by  Tom  Curtis  and  Robert  Thompson.  Pp.  160,  inch  coloured 
illustrations  & maps.  National  Museums  Northern  Ireland,  Belfast.  2009.  £20.00  hardback, 
plus  postage  & packing.  [Available  from:  National  Museums  Northern  Ireland,  Cultra, 
Holywood,  Co.  Down,  Northern  Ireland  BT18  0EU,  or  via  info@nmni.com] 

This  useful  guide  contains  excellent  coloured  plates  of  each  orchid  in  situ  and  close-up,  as 
well  as  distribution  maps  of  all  species  to  be  found  in  Ireland.  Keys  to  genera  and  to 
species  are  also  provided,  together  with  an  informative  introductory  chapter  on 
morphology,  habitats  and  ecology,  and  classification  of  orchids,  as  well  as  a bibliography, 
glossary  and  index. 

A Dictionary  of  Environment  and  Conservation  by  Chris  Park.  Pp.vi  + 522,  incl.  21 
line  drawings.  Oxford  University  Press.  2008.  £10.99  paperback. 

This  valuable  addition  to  the  naturalist’s  reference  bookshelf  is  packed  with  up-to-date 
information  and  well  as  definitions  of  more  than  8,500  environmental  terms  and  issues. 
Highlighted  key  words  have  been  treated  in  more  detail,  and  appendices  dealing  with  on- 
line data  sources,  international  treaties,  the  Beaufort  (wind),  Saffir-Simpson  (hurricane), 
Fujita  (tornado),  Torino  (asteroid  and  comet  impact  hazard)  and  Richter  and  Mercalli 
(earthquake)  scales,  geological  time-scale,  chemical  elements,  and  SI  units  and  conversions 
are  also  provided. 


WALL  FERNS  IN  EAST  HULL,  2004-2008 


15 


R.  MIDDLETON 
12  Meaux  Road,  Wawne  HU7  5XD 
e-mail:  r.middleton@hull.ac.uk 


Introduction 

Casual  observations  over  the  last  ten  years  have  suggested  that  the  fern  flora  of  Hull  has 
become  both  more  diverse  and  more  abundant.  This  seems  to  match  observations  made  in 
London  by  Edgington  (2000,  2003).  In  the  Flora  of  East  Yorkshire  (Robinson  1902)  no 
ferns  are  recorded  in  the  (admittedly  smaller  at  that  time)  urban  area  of  Hull.  In  the  East 
Riding  as  a whole,  Phyllitis  scolopendrium  was  described  as  ‘not  common  and  apparently 
vanishing’,  Asplenium  ruta-muraria  as  ‘frequent,  but  sparing  in  quantity’,  A.  trichomanes 
as  ‘frequent  on  old  walls’,  and  A.  adiantum-nigrum  was  only  known  on  Easington  Church. 
The  Millennium  survey  of  Hull  (Middleton  2000)  revealed  the  presence  of  all  of  these 
species  growing  on  suburban  walls  in  Hull  (Figure  1 ) . 

A subsequent  study  (Middleton  2005b),  mapped  the  distribution  of  ferns  in  more  detail 
and  established  that  low  (c.  1 m)  suburban  garden  walls,  built  of  impervious  bricks  bonded 
with  lime  mortar,  provided  an  ideal  environment  for  the  growth  of  many  calcicole  fern 
species.  In  the  Hull  area  such  walls  are  typical  of  suburban  housing  built  during  the  1920s 
and  1930s.  It  was  also  proposed  here  that  the  observed  increase  in  species  diversity  within 
the  city  was  a direct  result  of  lower  levels  of  atmospheric  sulphur  dioxide,  a conclusion 
also  reached  by  Edgington  (2003)  for  London  ferns.  Recent  studies  of  the  lichen  flora  of 
Hull  by  Seaward  (2004,  2007)  revealed  a similar  increase  in  species  diversity  and 
attributed  this  to  the  same  cause. 


Figure  1 . Phyllitis  scolopendrium  and  Asplenium  trichomanes  growing  on  a garden  wall  in 

suburban  Hull. 


Naturalist  135  (2010) 


16 


Wall  Ferns  in  East  Hull,  2004-2008 


Method 

The  increase  in  fern  diversity  is  relatively  easy  to  monitor  and  since  the  Millennium  Flora 
Survey  two  new  fern  taxa  have  been  added  to  the  City’s  flora,  namely  Asplenium  marinum 
and  Cyrtomium  falcatum.  Although  it  is  likely  that  improved  air  quality  has  made  it 
possible  for  these  species  to  survive,  long-term  climate  change  and  spore  availability  are 
probably  just  as  important. 

In  order  to  establish  whether  there  is  any  change  in  the  abundance  of  ferns  a long-term 
sampling  study  is  required.  Garden  walls  provide  ideal  study  sites  for  repeat  surveys  as 
there  is  always  easy  access  and  their  gates  are  conveniently  labelled  with  a number!  Two 
areas  a little  over  1 km  apart  in  eastern  suburbs  of  Hull,  each  comprising  three  adjacent, 
sub-parallel,  streets  of  inter- war  housing  and  known  “ferny”  garden  walls,  were  selected  for 
monitoring  (Table  1 ) . The  three  species  most  commonly  encountered  on  garden  walls  in  this 
part  of  the  city  are  Asplenium  trichomanes , A.  ruta-muraria  and  Phyllitis  scolopendrium. 
Dryopteris  spp.  and  Asplenium  adiantum-nigrum  are  also  to  be  found,  but  not  with  a high 
enough  frequency  for  meaningful  comparisons  to  be  made.  In  June  2004,  July  2006  and 
August  2008,  the  street-facing  sides  of  all  garden  walls  in  the  study  areas  were  examined 
and  a count  made  of  the  number  of  walls  bearing  ferns  of  each  of  the  target  species.  In  2006 
and  2008  an  attempt  was  also  made  to  count  the  individual  plants  of  each  fern  taxon  but  in 
some  clustered  colonies  it  was  not  always  possible  to  make  a consistent  count. 


TABLE  1 Sampling  areas 


Area 

1 

2 

Orientation 

SSE  - NNW 

ESE  - WNW 

Ellesmere  Avenue 

Lancaster  Drive 

Waldegrave  Avenue 

Burlington  Road 

Shaftsbury  Avenue 

Skirbeck  Road 

Total  length  (m) 

1050 

560 

Centroid 

TA  130  316 

TA  117  320 

Results  and  Discussion 

As  can  be  seen  from  Table  2 and  Figure  2a,  the  number  of  properties  with  “ferny”  garden 
walls  has  shown  a steady  increase,  doubling  over  the  4-year  period.  The  effect  was  smaller 
in  area  1 (55%),  but  very  marked  in  area  2 (138%).  The  difference  is  due,  at  least  in  part,  to 
the  observed  loss  of  suitable  walls  for  colonisation  in  the  first  area.  Here  the  slightly  wider 
streets  and  bigger  front  gardens  have  encouraged  some  residents  to  demolish  their  garden 
walls  and  create  off-street  parking  areas,  resulting  in  a loss  of  suitable  habitat  and  offsetting 
some  of  the  potential  for  gain. 

The  increase  in  properties  with  any  type  of  fern  on  the  garden  wall  is  mirrored  by  each 
of  the  individual  fern  taxa  monitored.  Figures  2b-2d  demonstrate  that  the  colonisation  of 
walls  has  been  proportionally  similar  indicating  that  the  factor  influencing  the  change  is 
affecting  all  species  equally.  If  the  change  was  solely  a function  of  climate  amelioration  it 
might  be  expected  that  it  would  influence  the  taxa  differentially,  which  does  not  appear  to 
be  the  case.  If  it  were  warmer  or  moister  conditions  driving  the  change  then  it  would  be 
expected  that  Hart’s  Tongue,  which  is  a species  with  a more  dominantly  south-western 
distribution,  would  be  favoured.  The  data  presented  here  do  not  support  this  supposition. 

An  alternative  explanation  is  that  the  expansion  is  a direct  result  of  the  improvement  in 
air  quality  in  suburban  Hull.  Sulphur  dioxide,  and  to  a lesser  extent  oxides  of  nitrogen,  in 
the  atmosphere  dissolve  in  precipitated  moisture  to  decrease  the  pH  of  rain  water.  The 
reproductive  biology  of  ferns  is  fundamentally  different  from  that  of  vascular  plants  and 


Wall  Ferns  in  East  Hull,  2004-2008 


17 


TABLE  2 

a:  Number  of  ferny  garden  walls  in  each  street 


2004 

2006 

2008 

Ellesmere  Avenue 

9 

14 

14 

Waldegrave  Avenue 

12 

11 

17 

Shaftsbury  Avenue 

1 

0 

3 

Lancaster  Drive 

14 

15 

20 

Burlington  Road 

5 

10 

15 

Skirbeck  Road 

7 

19 

27 

Total 

48 

69 

96 

b:  Walls  with  Asplenium  trichomanes  (total  number  of  plants  bracketed) 

2004 

2006 

2008 

Ellesmere  Avenue 

3 

8(20) 

10(80) 

Waldegrave  Avenue 

3 

4(13) 

8(55) 

Shaftsbury  Avenue 

0 

0 

0(0) 

Lancaster  Drive 

2 

1(1) 

2(9) 

Burlington  Road 

5 

8(34) 

11(37) 

Skirbeck  Road 

3 

5(47) 

15(135) 

Total 

16 

26(115) 

46(316) 

c:  Walls  with  Asplenium  ruta 

muraria  (total  number  of  plants  bracketed) 

2004 

2006 

2008 

Ellesmere  Avenue 

0 

2(4) 

1(1) 

Waldegrave  Avenue 

4 

3(6) 

6(25) 

Shaftsbury  Avenue 

0 

0 

1(1) 

Lancaster  Drive 

12 

13(137) 

18(207) 

Burlington  Road 

1 

4(6) 

6(23) 

Skirbeck  Road 

2 

6(107) 

17(258) 

Total 

19 

28(260) 

49(515) 

d:  Walls  with  Phyllitis  scolopendrium  (total  number  of  plants  bracketed) 

2004 

2006 

2008 

Ellesmere  Avenue 

7 

9(32) 

11(78) 

Waldegrave  Avenue 

9 

7(13+) 

9(25) 

Shaftsbury  Avenue 

0 

0 

2(3) 

Lancaster  Drive 

2 

1(3) 

5(7) 

Burlington  Road 

1 

0 

2(2) 

Skirbeck  Road 

2 

12(64) 

12(106) 

Total 

21 

29(112+) 

41(221) 

18 


Wall  Ferns  in  East  Hull,  2004-2008 


a:  any  fern  taxon  b:  Asplenium  trichomanes 


c:  Asplenium  ruta-muraria  d:  Phyllitis  scolopendrium 


2004  2006  2008  2004  2006  2008 


Figure  2.  Number  of  houses  with  a ferny  garden  wall;  area  1 - hatched,  area  2 - solid. 


30 
25 
20 
15 
10 
5 
0 

Figure  3.  Mean  hourly  sulphur  dioxide  levels  (pg.m3)  in  central  Hull,  1994-2008. 

Note  that  in  2002  the  monitoring  site  was  moved  a short  distance.  The  2008  figure  is  for 
the  first  eight  months  of  the  year,  comparison  with  2007  for  the  same  period  suggests  that 
the  yearly  average  would  be  expected  to  rise  by  less  than  0.2 


involves  the  transmission  of  genetic  material  as  gametes  from  one  plant  to  another  through 
a film  of  water  rather  than  through  the  air  as  pollen.  This  means  that  the  composition  of  the 
water  film  is  critical  to  the  reproductive  success  of  ferns  and  can  be  enough  to  inhibit  it 
completely.  In  a recent,  and  temporally  overlapping,  study  of  the  lichen  flora  of  Hull 
(Seaward,  2004,  2007),  an  increase  in  diversity  was  similarly  attributed  mainly  to  a 
reduction  in  atmospheric  sulphur  dioxide. 

In  1970  the  total  UK  atmospheric  release  of  S02  was  around  6.4  Mt,  slightly  over  half 
of  which  was  resulting  from  public  power  generation  (Dore  et  al.  2008).  By  1990  this  had 
fallen  to  a total  of  3.7  Mt,  with  little  of  the  decline  being  attributable  to  power  stations. 


Wall  Ferns  in  East  Hull,  2004-2008 


19 


After  1990  there  was  a marked  reduction  in  emissions  from  power  stations  which,  coupled 
with  a continued  decline  in  other  sources,  reduced  the  UK  total  output  to  1.0  Mt  S02  by 
2000  (Dore  et  al.  2008). 

Although  Hull’s  own  coal-fired  power  station  was  closed  in  the  latter  half  of  the  1970s 
there  are  three  of  Britain’s  largest  power  stations,  Drax,  Ferrybridge  and  Eggborough,  sited 
downwind  of  the  city  at  the  head  of  the  Aire  Valley.  With  this  in  mind,  it  is  not  to  be 
expected  that  background  sulphur  dioxide  levels  would  have  fallen  significantly  between 
1970  and  1990.  Road  vehicle  fuels  were,  until  relatively  recently,  also  a significant  local 
source  of  atmospheric  sulphur  with  total  UK  output  peaking  at  64  kt  in  1990,  but  falling 
rapidly  to  4 kt  by  2001.  Reduction  in  duty  on  low-sulphur  fuels  probably  contributing,  at 
least  in  part,  to  this  decline.  Figure  3 illustrates  the  steady  decline  in  atmospheric  S02  as 
measured  in  central  Hull,  the  closest  long-term  monitoring  station,  over  the  last  15  years. 
The  concentration  of  the  gas  can  be  seen  to  have  fallen  by  almost  78%  over  the  decade 
which  preceded  the  study  period  and  by  almost  90%  at  the  end. 

Locally  the  situation  is  a little  more  complex  as  the  Holliday  Pigments  factory,  a 
leading  producer  of  ultramarine  blue,  was  situated  on  the  banks  of  the  River  Hull  just 
2.5  km  WSW  of  area  1 and  1.5  km  SW  of  area  2.  Until  flue-gas  desulphurisation 
equipment  was  installed  in  the  late- 1990s,  the  factory  was  emitting  around  6.6  kt  of  S02 
per  year.  This  would  have  contributed  significantly  to  the  atmospheric  S02  in  both  survey 
areas.  Problems  with  the  equipment  meant  that  after  a promising  start  the  discharge  consent 
had  to  be  increased  from  the  initially  stipulated  200  to  500  tonnes  each  year  in  2004,  but 
still  representing  more  than  a 90%  reduction  (Hull  City  Council  2004).  The  site  closed 
completely  in  2007. 

Conclusions 

The  data  show  that  over  the  monitoring  period  there  has  been  a marked  and  consistent 
increase  in  both  the  number  of  walls  bearing  ferns  and  the  number  of  individual  fern  plants 
within  the  study  areas.  This  increase  amounts  to  a little  more  than  a doubling  of  the  number 
of  walls  colonised  and  is  consistent  for  each  of  the  three  species  monitored.  Although  it 
was  only  measured  over  the  last  two  years,  the  total  number  of  plants  of  each  taxon  also 
increased  by  a factor  of  2 or  more. 

Measurements  taken  in  central  Hull  over  the  same  period  show  a consistent  fall  in  the 
background  concentration  of  atmospheric  S02.  Local  factors  have  also  reduced  the  amount 
of  sulphur  discharged  into  the  air  around  the  study  areas  and  it  would  be  tempting  to 
suggest  a simple  inverse  relationship  between  the  number  of  individual  ferns  counted  and 
the  level  of  S02  What  seems  more  likely  is  that  regeneration  is  effectively  inhibited  when 
the  atmospheric  sulphur  is  above  a certain  level.  The  increase  observed  in  both  the  number 
of  sites  and  individual  plants  is  evidence  of  a natural  colonisation  process  which  only 
started  when  concentrations  fell  below  a critical  level,  possibly  over  a decade  ago.  The 
critical  level  was  probably  dependent  on  several  factors  including  the  amount  of  rain  at 
crucial  periods  in  the  fern’s  reproductive  cycle. 

References 

Crackles,  F.  E.  (1990)  Flora  of  the  East  Riding  of  Yorkshire.  University  of  Hull,  Hull. 

Dore,  C.J.  et  al.  (2007)  UK  Emissions  of  Air  Pollutants  1970  to  2005.  Download  available 
at:  http://www.airquality.co.uk/archive/reports/cat07/080 1 140937_2005_Report_FINAL.pdf 
Edgington,  J.  (2000)  Aspleniaceae  and  Polypodiaceae  in  London.  The  London  Naturalist 
79:51-54. 

Edgington,  J.  (2003)  Ferns  of  the  metropolis  - a status  report.  The  London  Naturalist  82: 
59-73. 

Hull  City  Council  (2004)  Air  quality  annual  report.  Download  available  at: 
http://www.hullcc.gov.uk/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/HOME/ENVIRONMENT/ 
POLLUTION/ AIR%  20QU  ALIT  Y/AIR%20M  AN  AGEMENT/AIR%  20 
MONITORING/MAY2004DETAILED  ASSESSMENT.PDF 


20  Wall  Ferns  in  East  Hull,  2004-2008 

Middleton,  R.  (2000)  The  plants  of  Hull:  a millennium  atlas.  Available  online  at: 
http://www.hull.ac.uk/hullflora/  viewed  Jan.  2009. 

Middleton,  R.  (2005a)  Suburban  ferns  in  Kingston-upon-Hull  - exploitation  of  a deco- 
mural environment.  BSBI  News  98:  28-30. 

Middleton,  R.  (2005b)  Ferns  in  Kingston-upon-Hull.  Unpublished  report  for  the  Hull 
Biodiversity  Partnership.  25pp. 

Robinson,  J.  F.  (2003)  The  Flora  of  the  East  Riding  of  Yorkshire.  Brown,  Hull. 

Seaward,  M.  R.  D.  (2004)  The  lichen  flora  of  Hull,  with  particular  reference  to  zonal 
distribution  and  environmental  monitoring.  Naturalist  129:  61-66. 

Seaward,  M.  R.  D.  (2007)  The  lichen  flora  of  Hull:  biodiversity  update,  2002-2006. 
Naturalist  132:  41-49. 


BOTANICAL  REPORT  FOR  2009 
FLOWERING  PLANTS  AND  FERNS 

Compiled  by 
P.P.  ABBOTT 

It  is  amazing  and  gratifying  that  every  year  rare  and  uncommon  plants  are  still  being  found 
in  new  sites,  some  of  them  even  new  to  Yorkshire  although  these  are  usually  non-native 
plants  which  have  escaped  from  gardens.  However,  the  star  find  this  year  must  be  Cotula 
alpina,  an  Australian  species  native  to  New  South  Wales,  Victoria  and  Tasmania,  which  is 
believed  to  be  new  to  Britain  and  to  Europe.  It  was  found  and  identified  by  Linda 
Robinson,  first  on  Kirkby  Malzeard  Moor  and  then  in  several  other  sites  in  VCs.  64  and  65 
on  the  moorland  between  Nidderdale  and  Wensleydale.  The  identification  was  confirmed 
by  Eric  Clement.  In  1995  it  had  been  found  on  Dallow  Moor  and  misidentified  as 
C.  squalida  since  C.  alpina  is  not  mentioned  in  any  of  the  British  Floras.  Similarly,  it  was 
found  in  September  this  year,  by  members  of  the  Ryedale  Natural  History  Society,  on 
Rudland  Rigg  in  VC  62  and  initially  identified  as  C.  squalida.  The  plants  at  this  site  have 
now  also  been  redetermined  as  C.  alpina. 

Other  notable  finds  include  Oenanthe  pimpinelloides  in  fields  near  Priory  Meadows  in 
Hull,  its  only  site  in  northern  England,  and  Salvia  verbenaca,  found  this  year  in  Staveley 
churchyard,  which  had  not  been  recorded  in  VC  64  since  1876.  It  was  pleasing  to  learn  that 
the  iconic  Cypripedium  calceolus  has  produced  flowers  in  all  its  reintroduction  sites.  Other 
interesting  records  are  listed  below. 

Nomenclature  is  according  to  Vice-county  Census  Catalogue  of  Vascular  Plants  of 
Great  Britain  (2003)  edited  by  C.A.Stace  et  al.  * denotes  a new  vice-county  record. 

SOUTH-EAST  YORKSHIRE  (VC  61) 

Anacamptis pyramidalis  Hull,  Priory  Meadows,  TA0531 , D.R.Grant 

Carex  divisa  North  Ferriby,  field  edge,  SE988252,  P.Cook 

Carex  viridula  ssp.  viridula  Allerthorpe  Common,  SE7647,  D.R.Grant 

Filipendula  vulgaris  Cleaving  Combe,  SE8646,  D.R.Grant 

Gentiana  pneumonanthe  Skipwith  Common,  SE653372,  D.R.Grant 

Hieracium  umbellatum  Allerthorpe  Common,  SE7547,  D.R.Grant 

Hordeum  secalinum  North  Ferriby,  field  edge,  SE998252,  P.  Cook 

Oenanthe  aquatica  Hull,  Priory  Meadows,  TA0531 , R.Middleton 

Oenanthe  fistulosa  Hull,  Priory  Meadows,  TA0531 , R.Middleton 

Oenanthe  pimpinelloides  Hull,  fields  near  Priory  Meadows,  TA0531,  R.Middleton 

Ophioglossum  vulgatum  Hull,  Priory  Meadows,  TA05 31,  R.Middleton 

Silaum  silaus  Hull,  Priory  Meadows,  TA0531 , R.Middleton 

Thalictrum  flavum  Hull,  Priory  Meadows,  TA053 1 , R.Middleton 


Naturalist  135  (2010) 


21 


Botanical  Report  for  2009  - Flowering  Plants  and  Ferns 

NORTH-EAST  YORKSHIRE  (VC  62) 

Actaea  spicata  Gilling,  Scar  Wood,  SE619768,  G.Smith 
Allium  scorodoprasum  Broughton,  north  side  of  track,  SE767720,  G.Smith 
Antennaria  dioica  Sand  Dale,  SE858848,  G.Smith 
Aphanes  australis  Lodge  Hag,  SE670741 , W.Thompson 
Atropa  belladonna  Hutton  Common,  on  hillside,  SE7087,  G.Smith 
Berberis  vulgaris  Gilling,  SE607771,  G.Smith 

Campanula  glomerata  Broughton,  Flowery  Lane  road  verge,  SE766716,  G.Smith 
Carex  divulsa  ssp.  leersii  Hovingham,  Socarrs  Lane,  SE675761,  W.Thompson 
Cirsium  eriophorum  Hutton  Common,  on  hillside,  SE7087,  G.Smith 
Cirsium  eriophorum  Wath,  old  quarry,  good  colony,  SE676749,  W.Thompson 
Clinopodium  acinos  Gundale,  base  of  old  quarry,  SE800881,  G.Smith 
Colchicum  autumnale  Castle  Howard  Arboretum  in  rough  grassland,  SE703701 , 
W.Thompson 

Convallaria  majalis  Wath  Wood,  a large  patch,  SE673741 , W.Thompson 
Cuscuta  epithymum  Gundale,  on  Rockrose,  SE800880,  G.Smith 
Dactylorhiza  traunsteineri  Sand  Dale,  SE858848,  G.Smith,  det.  R.Bateman 
Epipactis palustris  Sievedale  Fen,  at  base  of  slope,  SE853878,  G.Smith 
Equisetum  hyemale  Goathland,  footpath  behind  hotel,  NZ826010,  G.Smith 
Eriophorum  latifolium  Sand  Dale,  SE858848,  G.Smith 
Eilipendula  vulgaris  Yatts,  SE807881 , G.Smith 
Frankenia  laevis  Howkeld,  roadside,  SE685856,  G.Smith 
Gagea  lutea  Appleton,  near  top  of  bank,  SE742880,  G.Smith 
Gagea  lutea  Kirkdale,  SE677857,  G.Smith,  W.  A .Thompson 
Gymnadenia  conopsea  ssp.  densiflora  Sievedale  Fen,  SE853878,  G.Smith 
Helleborus  viridis  Ashberry,  many  plants,  SE5784,  G.Smith 
Hordelymus  europaeus  Kitscrew  Wood,  SE67 1748,  W.Thompson 
Lathraea  squamaria  Gilling,  on  Hazel  above  church,  SE616768,  G.Smith 
Lathraea  squamaria  Robson’s  Spring,  by  bridleway  east  of  Low  Parks  farm,  SE6381 , 
G.Smith 

Lister  a cordata  Damholme,  2 clusters,  NZ838023,  G.Smith 
Lithospermum  officinale  Wath  SINC,  woodland  edge,  SE670746,  W.Thompson 
Monotropa  hypopitys  Sutherbruff,  under  Pine  tree,  SE870875,  G.Smith 
Narcissus  pseudonarcissus  Appleton,  woods  to  east,  SE742880,  G.Smith 
Neottia  nidus-avis  Yedmandale,  old  quarry;  many  flower  spikes,  SE978860,  M.Walshaw 
Ophrys  insectifera  Yatts,  many  plants,  SE806879,  G.Smith 
Orchis  morio  Hole  of  Horcum,  SE849936,  G.Smith 
Orchis  ustulata  Yatts,  on  bank,  SE806879,  G.Smith 
Orobanche  elatior  Broughton,  Flowery  Lane,  SE767721 , G.Smith 
Orobanche  elatior  Swinton  Lane,  SE760720,  W.Thompson 
Paris  quadrifolia  Gilling,  SE6 19769,  G.Smith 
Phegopteris  connectilis  Brandsby  Dale,  4 colonies  beside  stream,  SE595735,  W.Thompson 
Picris  hieracioides  Hovingham  quarry,  on  quarry  faces  and  spoil,  SE669752,  W.Thompson 
Platanthera  bifolia  Yatts,  SE806879,  G.Smith 
Platanthera  chlorantha  Hutton  Common,  SE7087,  G.Smith 

Populus  nigra  Stonegrave,  regeneration  from  base  of  tree  blown  down  in  gale.  Last  known 
Black  Poplar  in  the  area,  SE756775,  W.Thompson 
Potentilla  anglica  Bulmer  Hagg,  SE7167,  G.Smith 
Ranunculus  lingua  Whitwell,  SE7 15668,  G.Smith 

Rhamnus  cathartica  Wath  SINC,  woodland  edge,  SE670745,  W.Thompson 

Rorippa  microphylla  Hovingham,  in  and  beside  beck,  SE666758,  W.Thompson 

Rubus  amplificatus  Carlton,  NZ506041 , V. Jones 

Rubus  cinerosus  near  Great  Ay  ton,  NZ574 108,  A. Newton 

Rubus  conjugens  Whitby,  Upgang  ravine,  NZ850118,  A.Newton 


22 


Botanical  Report  for  2009  - Flowering  Plants  and  Ferns 

Rubus  incurvatiformis  near  Kildale,  NZ6 13098,  VJones 

Rubus  infestus  Yearsley  Moor,  SE579750,  A. Newton 

Rubus  pallidus  Goathland,  NZ824001 , D.R.Grant 

Silene  noctiflora  Whitwell,  set  aside  field,  SE7266,  G.Smith 

Spergularia  rubra  Lastingham,  SE729908,  M.Walshaw 

Stellaria  neglecta  Horse  Coppice,  grass  verge,  SE654751,  W.Thompson 

Stellaria  neglecta  Brandsby,  laneside,  SE595723,  W.Thompson 

Trientalis  europaea  Hovingham  High  Wood,  SE64875 5,  W.Thompson 

Verbascum  nigrum  Hartoft,  SE749931,  G.Smith 

Vicia  sylvatica  Cawthom,  Peat  Rigg  Bank,  SE770895,  G.Smith 


SOUTH-WEST  YORKSHIRE  (VC  63) 

Asplenium  adiantum-nigrum  Horbury  Junction,  brick  wall,  SE302177,  D.R.Grant 

Clematis  vitalba  Shafton,  Rabbit  Ings,  SE378114,  J.Greaves 

Dactylorhiza  praetermissa  Bullcliffe  Wood,  old  mine  site,  SE285149,  D.Proctor 

Dactylorhiza  maculata  Wessenden  Head,  SE070070,  M.J. Lucas 

Frangula  alnus  Howell  Wood  Country  Park,  SE435096,  J. Lambert 

Hieracium  umbellatum  Bolton-on-Deame,  old  mine  site,  SE432028,  T.Schofield 

Narthecium  ossifragum  Wessenden  Head,  SE070070,  M.J .Lucas 

Picris  echioides  Kilnhurst,  railway  wall-top,  SK459971 , T.Schofield 

Rubus  echinatus  Bullcliffe  Wood,  old  mine  site,  SE285149,  D.R.Grant 

Rubus  rufescens  Howell  Wood  Country  Park,  SE4309,  YNU,  det.  D.R.Grant 

MID- WEST  YORKSHIRE  (VC  64) 

Allium  oleraceum  Leeds,  Gipton  Wood,  SE325367,  P.P. Abbott 
Allium  scorodoprasum  Newton  Kyme,  roadside,  SE451447,  P.P.Abbott 
Allium  vineale  Leathley,  SE229482,  N. Vernon 
Andromeda  polifolia  Red  Syke  Head,  SD679605,  PC .G .Green 
Aquilegia  vulgaris  Oxenber  Wood,  SD7868,  Bradford  Botany  Group 
Asperula  cynanchica  Ledsham  Banks,  SE4630,  S.Joul 
Asplenium  adiantum-nigrum  Ilkley,  SE1046,  Wharfedale  Naturalists’  Society 
Campanula  glomerata  Famham,  road  verge,  SE354669,  P.P.Abbott 
Campanula  glomerata  Roach  Lime  Hills,  many  plants,  SE419315,  P.P.Abbott 
Campanula  trachelium  Follifoot,  railway  cutting,  SE340576, 1.Wallace 
Carex  disticha  Ribblehead  Quarry,  SD767787,  J.Newbould,  T.Whitaker 
Carex  elongata  Bishop  Wood,  second.record  in  V.C.  64,  SE551326,  M.Hammond 
Ceterach  ojficinarum  Foxup,  by  Foxup  Beck,  SD860766,  B. Burrow 
* Dactylorhiza  xformosa  Ribblehead,  SE776784,  N.Barrett,  M.Wilcox 
Dactylorhiza  x insignis  Otley  Wetlands,  SE1844,  Bradford  Botany  Group 
Dipsacus pilosus  Bolton  Abbey  Woods,  SE075555,  B. Brown 
Dipsacus  pilosus  Fountains  Abbey,  SE280688, 1.Wallace 

Dryopteris  submontana  Giggles  wick  Scar,  SD809654,  R.  Wilding,  conf.  M.Canaway 
*Dryopteris  x ambrosiae  Ingleborough,  SD743747,  B. Brown,  conf.  K.Trewren 
Equisetum  x litorale  Ribblehead  Quarry,  SD766787,  M.Wilcox,  conf.  B. Brown 
Filago  vulgaris  near  Hellifield  station,  SD8557,  E.Shorrock 
Filipendula  vulgaris  Ledsham  Banks,  SE462302,  Leeds  Naturalists’  Club 
Groenlandia  densa  Harden  Bridge,  in  Austwick  Beck,  SD762678,  C.R. Abbott,  P. Abbott 
Gymnocarpium  robertianum  Feizor,  in  scree  below  scar,  SD789681,  Bradford  Botany 
Group 

Hottonia  palustris  Spofforth,  SE364514, 1.Wallace 
Huperzia  selago  Antley  Gill,  SD670596,  P.C.G.Green 
Hypericum  humifusum  Fewston,  SE 160564,  M. Atkinson 
Lathraea  squamaria  Hubberholme,  SD918783,  N.Moore 


23 


Botanical  Report  for  2009  - Flowering  Plants  and  Ferns 

Neottia  nidus-avis  Fountains  Abbey,  29  spikes,  SE281688, 1.Wallace 
Onobrychis  viciifolia  Follifoot,  SE340576, 1. Wallace 

Orobanche  minor  Newton  Kyme,  road  verge;  on  Vicia  sepium,  SE455447,  A. Hanson, 
R.Masheder  det.  P.P. Abbott 

Polystichum  setiferum  Dunsop  Fell,  SD6854,  EE.Greenwood 
Polystichum  setiferum  Otley,  riverbank,  SE206461 , B. Brown 
Pulicaria  dysenterica  Otley  Chevin,  SE20 1445,  B. Brown 
Ranunculus  penicillatus  Clitheroe,  SD7242,  EE.Greenwood 
Rhamnus  cathartic  a Kettle  well,  SD7242,  T.  Whitaker 
Ribes  spicatum  Barden,  SE054584,  B. Brown,  conf.  M. Wilcox 
Rubus  polyanthemus  Adel,  SE281401 , D.R. Grant 
Salix  x ambigua  Ribblehead,  SD776784,  M.Wilcox 
Salvia  verbenaca  Staveley  churchyard,  SE362626,  B.Lobo,  conf.  K.Walker 
Saxifraga  x polita  Slaidbum,  SE7052,  EE.Greenwood 
Stellaria  neglecta  Edisford,  SD725414,  M.Wilcox 
Thlaspi  caerulescens  Yambury,  old  lead  mine,  SE017657,  Wharfedale  Naturalists’  Society 
Tilia platyphyllos  Ledsham,  Claypit  Lane,  small  tree  in  hedge,  SE450293,  Leeds 
Naturalists’  Club 

Veronica  polita  Edisford,  SD724414,  M.Wilcox 

NORTH-WEST  YORKSHIRE  (V.C.  65) 

Alopecurus  borealis  Great  Shunner  Fell,  SD842970,  R.Comer,  L.Robinson 
Allium  scorodoprasum  West  Burton,  SE0186,  YNU  Botany  Section 
*Asperula  cynanchica  Widdale  Bridge,  hay  meadow,  SD825876,  F.  Graham 
*Dactylorhiza  x grandis  Marfield  Wetlands,  SE2082,  L.Robinson,  A.  Gendle 
*Epilobium  xfacchinii  Shunner  Fell,  flush,  SD844971,  J. Somerville,  M.Wilcox 
Equisetum  x litorale  Ballowfield  NatureReserve,  SD9889,  BSBI 
*Equisetum  x rothmaleri  Ballowfield  Nature  Reserve,  SD9889,  BSBI 
Euphrasia  arctica  ssp.  borealis  West  Burton,  SE0086,  YNU  Botany  Section 
Galium  x pomeranicum  Kilmond  Scar,  NZ0212,  J.Clarke,  L.Robinson 
*FIieracium  leyi  Widdale,  gill,  SD799886,  B. Burrow,  conf.  D.McCosh 
Vaccinium  uliginosum  Great  Shunner  Fell,  peat  hags  on  summit  plateau,  SD848972, 
R.Dimon,  M.Owen 

Vaccinium  uliginosum  Great  Shunner  Fell,  acid  mire,  SD843969,  S. Hewitt 

ALIEN  PLANTS 

Aconitum  lycoctonum  Amotherby  Church  grounds,  SE749733,  W.Thompson 
Allium  subhirsutum  Chellow  Dene,  SE131339,  B.A.Tregale,  M.Wilcox 
Alopecurus  myosuroides  Dentdale,  head  of  dale,  SD764843,  J.Clarke 
Alyssum  saxatile  Thackley,  on  garden  wall.  Old  Windhill  Road,  SE168384,  B.K.Byme, 
BATregale,  M.Wilcox 

Amaranthus  retroflexus  Middlesborough,  waste  ground,  Douglas  St,  NZ503193  V.Jones, 
W.Thompson 

*Anemanthela  lessoniana  York,  waste  ground,  SE599519,  V.Jones,  W.Thompson 
*Astilbe  x arendsii  Stonehouse  Bridge,  riverside,  SD7684,  M.Canaway,  L.Robinson 
Bassia  scoparia  Middlesborough,  NZ503 193,  V.Jones,  W.Thompson 
* Bergenia  x schmidtii  Eldwick,  woodland,  SE121386,  B.A.Tregale,  M.Wilcox 
*Bergenia  x schmidtii  Bradford  Horton  Bank,  SE126310,  BATregale,  MWilcox 
Camelina  sativa  Thornaby,  Tees-side,  NZ47 1184,  V.Jones,  W.Thompson 
Chiastophyllum  oppositifolium  Dentdale,  by  road  bridge,  SD7686,  B. Burrow 
Chrysanthemum  segetum  Whitwell,  1 plant,  SE7 1 966 1,  G. Smith 
Clematis  tangutica  Scarborough  Crossing,  TA030459,  J.Killingbeck 
Cordyline  australis  Bradford,  Queens  Avenue,  SE 164349,  B.A.Tregale 
*Cotula  alpina  Kirkby  Malzeard  Moor,  SE176760,  L.Robinson 


24 


Botanical  Report  for  2009  - Flowering  Plants  and  Ferns 

*Cotula  alpina  Potts  Moor,  SE1 19754,  L.Robinson,  conf.  E.Clement 
*Cotula  alpina  Rudland  Rigg,  SE649956,  Ryedale  Natural  History  Society 
* Cyclamen  coum  Hirst  Mill,  on  dumped  soil,  SE131384,  B.A.Tregale,  M.Wilcox 
Cyclamen  coum  Thackley,  field,  Old  Windhill  Road,  SE 163 3 81,  B.A.Tregale,  M.Wilcox 
Cymbalaria  pallida  var.  beguinotii  Thackley,  outside  of  garden  wall,  Old  Windhill  Road, 
SE163381,  B.A.Tregale,  M.Wilcox 

Cyrtomium  falcatum  Hull,  Wilberforce  House,  garden  wall  of  museum,  TA 10328 8 
R. Middleton 

Dipsacus  laciniatus  Otley,  Crow  Lane,  SE205455,  J. Hartley,  N.Vemon 
Doronicum  pardalianches  Harden  Bridge,  SD762678,  C.R. Abbott,  P.P. Abbott 
Duchesnia  indica  Yarm,  West  Street,  NZ417129,  VJones,  W.Thompson 
*Escallonia  x langleyensis  Bradford,  bank  by  Boar’s  Well,  SE164357,  B.A.Tregale 
Geranium  macrorrhizum  west  of  Cowgill,  in  lay-by,  SD742864,  J.Somerville  et  al. 

Geum  macrophyllum  Shipley  Glen,  SE128389,  Bradford  Botany  Group 
*Helianthus  x laetiflorus  Champion,  SD7452,  E.F.Greenwood 
*Iris  x robusta  Stonegrave,  by  pond,  SE654777,  W.Thompson 
*Jasminum  officinale  Yarm,  waste  ground,  Bridge  Street,  NZ418 131,  VJones, 

W.Thompson 

J uncus  tenuis  Skip  with  Common,  old  runway,  SE647370,  R. Middleton 
*Knautia  macedonica  Bradford,  waste  ground,  Fairweather  Green  Mills,  SE133334, 
B.A.Tregale,  M Wilcox,  det.  E.J. Clement 
Kniphofia  uvaria  Dalton-on-Tees,  woodland  edge,  NZ2808,  L.Robinson 
Lemna  minuta  South  Wood,  in  pond,  SE666742,  W.Thompson 
Leucojum  vernum  Shackleton  Lane  End,  SE653721,  W.Thompson 
Lilium  martagon  Austwick,  wide  verge  by  track,  SD773768,  Bradford  Botany  Group 
Luzula  luzuloides  Cowgill,  edge  of  rail  track,  SD764875,  J. Clarke 
Lychnis  coronaria  Masham,  edge  of  lagoon,  SE2 19821,  L.Robinson 
Malva  alcea  West  Marton,  roadside,  SD889503,  J.Clarke 
Mimulus  moschatus  Northdale,  marsh,  Castleton  Rd,  SE7 18978,  M.Walshaw 
Nectaroscordum  siculum  Famhill,  below  trees,  SE009460,  M.Canaway 
*Osteospermum  jucundum  Saltwick,  near  caravans,  NZ915107,  VJones,  A.Ritson 
*Oxalis  tetraphylla  Nunthorpe,  lane  near  Grange  Farm,  NZ542140,  VJones 
Petrorhagia  prolifera  Redcar,  South  Gare,  amongst  slag,  NZ557273,  VJones 
*Phlox paniculata  Dent,  in  hedge,  SD705866,  J.Clarke 
Phytolacca  acinosa  Skelton-on-Ure,  by  windmill,  SE375695, 1.Wallace 
Pratia pedunculata  Pickering,  lawn  in  Lintondale,  SE792 847,  VJones,  W.Thompson 
*Primula  denticulata  west  of  Cowgill,  in  lay-by,  SD742865,  J.Somerville  et  al. 

*Primula  x pruhonicensis  Thackley,  field  by  Old  Windhill  Road,  SE  1 6338 1 , B.A.Tregale, 
M.Wilcox 

Rhus  typhina  Chellow  Dene,  SE 129340,  B.A.Tregale,  M.Wilcox 
Saxifraga  x geum  Dentdale,  along  river,  SD7686,  B. Burrow 
Sedum  hispanicum  Greenhow,  stone  wall,  SE1 13641 , BSBI  det.  G.M.Kay 
Senecio  inaequidens  Hull,  Priory  Road,  TA049320,  J.Dews 
Solanum  physalifolium  York,  Water  End,  Clifton,  grass  verge,  SE590528,  VJones, 
W.Thompson 

Sorbus  commixta  Shipley,  riverside  in  scrub,  SE131384,  B.A.Tregale  det.  H.. McAllister 
*Trollius  x cultorum  Thackley,  disused  railway,  SE168384,  B.A.Tregale 
*Tulipa  gesneriana  Leybum  Shawl,  SE094903,  B. Armstrong,  L.Robinson 
*Viola  x wittrockiana  Masham,  edge  of  lagoon,  SE2 19821,  L.Robinson 


25 


THE  OSTRACOD  SCOTTIAPSEUDOBROWNIANA  KEMPF,  AN 
ADDITION  TO  THE  FRESHWATER  FAUNA  OF  YORKSHIRE, 
AND  A NOTE  ON  THE  EVOLUTION  OF  TERRESTRIAL  HABITS 
IN  OSTRACODS  AND  OTHER  CRUSTACEANS 

ANDY  GODFREY, 

90  Bence  Lane,  Dart  on,  Barnsley,  South  Yorkshire  S75  5DA 
GEOFFREY  FRYER 

Elleray  Cottage,  Windermere,  Cumbria  LA23  1AW 
and 

DAVID  J.  HORNE 

Dept,  of  Geography,  Queen  Mary  University  of  London,  Mile  End  Road,  London  El  4NS 
and  Dept,  of  Zoology,  The  Natural  History  Museum,  Cromwell  Road,  London  SW7  5BD 
email:  d.j.home@qmul.ac.uk 


Introduction 

In  1850  T.  Rupert  Jones  described  from  Pleistocene  deposits  at  Clacton,  England,  an 
ostracod  which  he  named  Cypris  browniana,  of  which  only  the  carapace  valves  (the  so- 
called  shell)  were  preserved  (Jones,  1850).  The  genus  Cypris  was  at  that  time  used  to 
embrace  forms  that  were  later  assigned  to  several  genera.  In  1889  Brady  and  Norman 
reported  that  they  had  received  from  Thomas  Scott  material  of  an  ostracod  that  he  had 
found  living  “in  pools  near  Loch  Fadd”  on  the  Island  of  Bute,  Scotland,  which  they 
regarded  as  being  conspecific  with  Jones’  fossil  C.  browniana.  Although  the  fossils  were  of 
Pleistocene  age,  and  therefore  not  very  old,  geologically  speaking,  this  was  nevertheless  an 
interesting  situation.  From  their  living  Scottish  material  they  described  and  illustrated  some 
of  the  appendages  (Brady  & Norman,  1889).  They  also  assigned  the  animal,  adult  females 
of  which  achieve  a length  of  up  to  c.  0.83  mm,  to  a new  genus,  Scottia,  named  for  the 
finder  of  the  living  specimens. 

Its  describers  were  sufficiently  intrigued  by  the  discovery  of  living  Scottia  for  Norman 
to  visit  the  site  where  it  was  collected,  which  was  later  described  by  Brady  and  Norman 
(1896).  Although  the  animal  was  originally  said  to  be  from  “pools  near  Loch  Fadd”,  they 
described  its  habitat  more  precisely  as  a spring  which  “rises  on  the  bank  close  to  the  loch, 
into  which  the  water  finds  its  way  among  the  grass;  the  water  is  nowhere  trickling  more 
than  two  or  three  inches  deep  among  the  herbage”.  Here  Scottia  was  living  with  a rich 
assemblage  of  other  ostracods,  Psychrodromus  robertsoni,  Herpetocypris  reptans , Eucypris 
pigra,  Candona  Candida , Candonopsis  kingsleii  and  Plesiocypridopsis  newtoni,  whose 
generic  assignments  given  here  are  the  modem  ones,  not  necessarily  those  used  by  Brady 
and  Norman.  Of  these,  all  save  P.  newtoni  are  non-swimming,  creeping  species. 

Examples  of  living  Scottia,  assigned  to  S.  browniana,  were  subsequently  recorded  from 
various  sites  in  Europe  under  this  name.  However,  Kempf  (1971)  showed  that  living 
representatives  of  what  had  long  been  regarded  as  conspecific  with  the  Pleistocene  fossils 
referred  to  as  S.  browniana  are  in  fact  distinct  from  it,  and  he  therefore  renamed  the  living 
species  S.  pseudobrowniana.  The  situation  is,  however,  more  complex  than  this  simple 
statement  implies.  In  fact  three  distinct  species  are  involved:  S.  browniana, 

S.  pseudobrowniana  and  S.  tumida.  The  last-mentioned  had  been  described  (as  Cypris 
tumida)  as  a Pleistocene  fossil  from  Essex  by  Jones  (1850)  and  subsequently,  also  as  a 
Pleistocene  fossil,  as  Cyclocypris  huckei  by  Triebel  (1941),  but  Kempf  (1971)  recognised 
not  only  that  these  were  conspecific  but  also  that  the  species  they  represent  belongs  in  the 
genus  Scottia.  Fossil  S.  browniana  is  sometimes  a major  component  of  ostracod 
assemblages  in  certain  palaeoenvironmental  settings  in  British  Pleistocene  deposits 
(Robinson,  1980).  In  Europe,  both  S.  browniana  and  S.  tumida  are  extinct,  Early  to  Middle 
Pleistocene  species,  the  youngest  British  occurrence  of  S.  browniana  being  in  the  Hoxnian 
interglacial  (Marine  Isotope  Stage  11),  while  S.  tumida  ranges  higher,  as  far  as  the  Purfleet 


Naturalist  135  (2010) 


26 


The  Ostracod  Scottia  pseudobrownian  Kempf 

interglacial  (MIS  9)  (Whittaker  & Horne,  2009).  The  extant  S.  pseudobrowniana,  which  is 
now  also  known  as  a fossil,  is  apparently  confined  as  such  to  the  Late  Pleistocene  and 
Holocene  (De  Deckker,  1979;  Robinson,  1980).  Thus,  although  Brady  and  Norman  (1889) 
were  in  fact  in  error  when  they  assigned  the  living  Scottia  from  Bute  to  S.  browniana,  it 
does  indeed  belong  to  a species  that  also  occurs  in  the  fossil  state ! 

As  no  appendages  of  S.  browniana  and  S.  tumida  are  known,  discrimination  of  the 
three  species  has  to  be  based  entirely  on  carapace  shape,  but  Kempf  (1971)  demonstrated 
convincingly  that  this  is  possible.  Compared  to  S.  pseudobrowniana , both  S.  browniana 
and  S.  tumida  have  relatively  shorter,  approximately  semi-circular  carapaces  (in  lateral 
view);  that  of  S.  browniana  has  a short,  straight  dorsal  marginal  section,  while  that  of 
S.  tumida  is  relatively  higher  with  a more  arched  dorsal  margin.  It  is  interesting  to  note 
that,  in  common  with  several  other  British  Pleistocene  species  such  as  Ilyocypris  salebrosa 
(see  Bates  et  al.,  2002),  S.  tumida  may  still  be  living  in  North  America  although  it  is 
evidently  extinct  in  Europe;  however,  records  from  the  USA  of  both  S.  tumida  and 
S.  pseudobrowniana  (e.g.  in  the  NANODe  database:  Forester  et  al.,  2005)  have  yet  to  be 
verified  by  careful  comparison  of  specimens  with  European  material;  for  example, 
S.  pseudobrowniana  has  been  reported  in  the  USA  from  Tennessee  (Cole,  1966)  and 
Nevada  (Kiilkoyliioglu  & Vinyard,  2000),  but  Smith  et  al.  (2002)  point  out  differences  in 
the  appendages  of  the  latter  record  which  suggest  that  it  may  be  a different  species. 

It  should  be  noted  that  the  illustrations  of  the  whole  animal  (i.e.  the  carapace  and 
appendages)  given  by  Brady  and  Norman  (1889)  and  reproduced  by  Klie  (1938)  were 
based  on  material  of  the  living  S.  pseudobrowniana  from  near  Loch  Fadd  and  not  on  fossil 
S.  browniana.  Meisch  (2000)  provided  a description  and  excellent  illustrations,  including 
the  appendages,  of  S . pseudobrowniana. 

The  known  distribution  of  all  three  species  is  shown  on  a map  provided  by  Kempf 
(1971)  and  their  ranges  have  only  been  extended  slightly  by  more  recent  finds.  Although 
Kempf  differentiated  between  sites  at  which  living  and  fossil  representatives  of 
S.  pseudobrowniana  were  found,  curiously  he  indicated  the  Bute  site,  from  which  the  first 
living  examples  were  described,  as  that  of  a fossil  find.  Its  distribution  (Fig.  1)  is 
predominantly  north-central  and  eastern  European  but  it  is  also  known  from  northern  Italy 


Figure  1 . European  distribution  of  extant  Scottia  pseudobrowniana,  from  the  NODE 
database  (Home  et  al.,  1998). 


27 


The  Ostracod  Scottia  pseudobrownian  Kempf 

and  has  been  reported  in  Turkey  (Kiilkoyliioglu,  2003,  2005).  As  noted  above,  it  may  also 
live  in  North  America.  In  Britain  it  is  known  from  relatively  few  sites.  Apart  from  the 
original  site  on  Bute,  it  has  been  found  near  Birmingham  (a  few  males  only)  by  Lowndes 
(1930)  and  at  the  margin  of  Skelsmergh  Tarn  in  Cumbria  by  Danielopol  et  al.  (1996). 
Henderson  (1990)  indicated,  on  a map,  a site  apparently  in  Essex,  which  may  in  fact  be  the 
fossil  type  locality  of  S.  browniana.  It  is  known  from  one  site  in  Ireland  (Douglas  & 
McCall.  1992). 

First  record  of  Scottia  pseudobrowniana  in  Yorkshire 

Here  we  report  the  discovery  of  S.  pseudobrowniana  in  Yorkshire  by  Andy  Godfrey  who 
collected  it  in  moss  from  tufaceous  springs  and  seepages  at  Seive  Dale  Fen,  Low  Dalby, 
North  Yorkshire  (SE854881)  on  1 July  2005.  The  seepages  and  springs  are  on  an  open  and 
gently  sloping  flushed  hillside  and  the  streams  issuing  from  these  flow  eastwards  where 
they  join  Dalby  Beck  at  the  foot  of  the  slope.  Vegetation  around  the  open  seepages  and 
springs  included  Schoenus  nigricans , Carex  spp.,  Filipendula  ulmaria , Dactylorhiza  sp., 
Cardamine  pratensis,  Lychnis  flos-cuculi,  Succisa  pratensis,  Pedicularis  palustris  and 
Hydrocotyle  vulgaris,  with  fringing  Salix  caprea  and  Alnus  glutinosa  woodland. 
Stone  worts  were  also  frequent  at  the  springheads  and  in  the  channels.  The  streams  issuing 
from  the  springs  and  seepages  were  generally  no  more  than  10cm  wide  and  usually  less 
than  5cm  deep.  Their  water  was  clear  brown  with  flow  only  perceptible  in  the  narrower 
parts  of  the  channels.  The  following  single  measurements  were  made  in  the  springs:  pH 
7.81,  water  temperature  11.6°C,  conductivity  612pS  cm1  and  total  dissolved  solids 
308ppm.  The  substrate  was  a combination  of  mud  and  organic  detritus  and  included 
obvious  tufa  fragments.  The  area  around  the  seepages  and  springs  was  poached  but  no 
cattle  were  present  on  the  day  of  the  visit.  Other  invertebrates  associated  with  the  springs 
and  seepages  included  the  aquatic  larvae  of  the  Red  Data  Book  1 and  UK  Biodiversity 
Action  Plan  soldier-fly  Odontomyia  hydroleon  and  the  larvae  of  other  scarce  or  local 
soldier-flies  ( Oxrycera  morrisii,  O.  pygmaea  and  Stratiomys  singularior) , the  Nationally 
Scarce  water-penny  beetle  Eubria  palustris  and  the  local  Sphagnum-bug  Hebrus  ruficeps. 

Habitat  requirements 

Kempf  (1971)  surveyed  the  published  information  on  the  ecology  of  S.  pseudobrowniana 
that  was  available  at  the  time.  A preference  for  springs  or  spring-fed  situations  is  evident; 
these  are  of  various  kinds,  often  swampy  and  sometimes  grassy  or  mossy  and,  not 
surprisingly,  predominantly  cool,  though  there  are  records  of  it  at  22°C  in  a spring-fed  area 
of  horsetails  ( Equisetum ) and  sedges  and  at  17°C  in  a stand  of  Char  a fed  by  a highly 
calcareous  spring.  Springs  with  lime-encrusted  moss,  or  in  which  ferruginous  deposits  are 
present,  are  among  those  frequented. 

A recent  find  by  Kiilkoyliioglu  (2003,  2005)  in  Turkey  confirms  earlier  suggestions 
that  it  is  a crenobiont,  preferring  cool  springs  or  waters  connected  to  such  springs.  Its 
associates  in  spring-fed  areas  include  several  ecologically-tolerant  species  of  ostracods  but 
also  Cryptocandona  vavrai  and  Potamocypris  zschokkei  as  well  as  (most  frequently) 
Psychrodromus  olivaceus  and  Eucypris  pigra,  all  of  which  favour  such  sites  and  seepages. 
It  has  also  been  found  in  springs  and  swamps  in  woodland  among  wet  leaf-litter  (Meisch 
2000)  where,  as  it  does  in  moss,  it  leads  a semi-terrestrial  (as  opposed  to  fully  aquatic) 
existence.  In  a Romanian  lake  it  has  been  found  inhabiting  floating  “swamp  islands” 
(Danielopol  & Vespremeanu,  1964)  comprising  masses  of  Phragmites , Typha,  Carex  and 
plant  detritus,  quite  similar  to  the  “floating  fen”  habitat  in  which  it  was  found  at  the 
margins  of  Skelsmergh  Tarn  in  Cumbria,  UK  (Danielopol  et  al.,  1996).  In  such  habitats  it  is 
commonly  associated  with  the  ostracods  Candonopsis  kingsleii  and  Metacypris  cordata. 

The  ecology  of  the  Seive  Dale  Fen  animals  is  in  accord  with  previous  knowledge  of  the 
species.  The  Seive  Dale  springs  are  tufaceous,  cool  and  characterised  by  vegetation 
including  mosses  and  charophytes,  which  closely  matches  the  observations  recorded  by 
Kempf  (1971),  Meisch  (2000),  Kulkoyliioglu  (2003)  and  others.  They  are  also 


28 


The  Ostracod  Scottia  pseudobrownian  Kempf 


characterised  by  the  local  black  bog  rush  Schoenus  nigricans  and  it  is  possible  that 
searches  in  other  springs  where  this  distinctive  calcicole  plant  occurs  may  reveal  further 
occurrences  of  this  scarce  and  probably  under-recorded  ostracod.  It  is  interesting  that  as  a 
result  of  extensive  work  on  Pleistocene  fossil  faunas,  the  genus  Scottia  has  come  to  be 
regarded  as  an  indicator  of  small,  shallow,  permanent  water  bodies,  with  a marked 
tendency  to  weed  growth  and  the  ultimate  development  of  a fen  (e.g.  Robinson,  1980), 
which  is  not  at  variance  with  the  preferences  shown  by  its  living  representative  in  Europe. 

FUNCTIONAL  MORPHOLOGY 

Scottia  pseudobrowniana  is  a crawling  species,  as  is  apparent  from  the  shortness  of  the  so- 
called  natatory  setae  on  its  antennae  and  from  the  robust  nature  of  the  furcal  (or  uropodal) 
rami  that  are  armed  distally  with  a pair  of  strong  claws  (among  the  stoutest  of  any 
podocopid  species)  which  are  used  for  levering  the  animal  forwards.  The  antennae,  which 
have  stout  distal  claws,  serve  mainly  to  pull  the  animal  along  and  cannot  be  used  for 
swimming  (in  many  freshwater  ostracods  the  antenna  has  a dual  role  in  both  crawling  and 
swimming).  Probably  related  to  its  crawling  habits  is  the  presence,  at  the  distal  extremity  of 
the  sixth  limb  (the  so-called  walking  leg),  of  not  only  the  robust,  curved,  terminal  claw  or 
spine  usual  in  cypridids,  but  also  a second  spine,  more  slender  but  of  similar  length.  Both 
spines  are  denticulate.  In  cypridids  other  than  Scottia , the  second  terminal  spine  is  usually 
represented  only  by  a small,  slender  seta.  Exactly  how  the  twin  terminal  spines  are  used  is 
not  clear,  but  they  may  aid  in  climbing  among  the  vegetation  through  which  the  animal 
crawls.  The  carapace  valves  (Fig.  2)  are  thick  and  robust,  which  may  be  an  advantage  when 
the  animal  leaves  the  cushioned  aquatic  environment,  as  is  probably  the  ability  to  close 
them  tightly  when  necessary. 


Figure  2.  Scottia  pseudobrowniana  from  Seive  Dale  Fen,  North  Yorkshire. 

Figured  specimens  deposited  in  the  Zoology  (Crustacea)  collection  at  the  Natural  History 
Museum,  London;  catalogue  numbers  given  in  brackets.  A:  female  carapace,  right  lateral 
view  (2010.245);  B:  male  left  valve,  internal  view  (2010.246);  C:  female  carapace,  ventral 
view  (2010.247);  D:  detail  of  framed  area  of  (C)  showing  rows  of  sensilla  near  outer  margin 
of  right  valve.  Arrows  indicate  anterior  direction.  Scale  bars  A-C:  100  pm;  D:  50  pm. 


The  Ostracod  Scottia  pseudobrownian  Kempf 


29 


Scottia  and  the  evolution  of  terrestrial  habits  in  ostracods 
For  more  than  70  years  S.  pseudobrowniana  remained  the  only  known  extant  species  of 
Scottia.  Subsequently  three  living  congeners  have  been  discovered  which  throw  interesting 
light  of  the  history  of  the  genus  from  geographical  and  ecological  standpoints.  The 
description  of  S.  audax  from  New  Zealand  by  Chapman  (1961)  (who  originally  placed  it  in 
the  genus  Mesocypris ) gave  Scottia  an  unexpectedly  wide  and  disjunct  distribution  (De 
Deckker,  1980).  A second  species,  S.  insularis  (Chapman,  1963)  is  known  from  Australasia 
but  is  inadequately  described.  More  recently  S.  birigida  has  been  described  from  Japan  by 
Smith  et  al.  (2002).  Such  a wide  distribution  hints  at  an  ancient  origin  for  the  genus 
although  pre-Pleistocene  fossil  records  appear  to  be  sparse  and  uncertain;  Swain  (1999) 
lists  several  species  from  the  Tertiary  of  the  USA  that  are  assigned  to  Scottia  with  varying 
degrees  of  confidence,  the  oldest  being  of  “late  Cretaceous  or  early  Tertiary”  age,  but  these 
records  are  in  need  of  verification.  Ecologically,  the  extant  species  share  with 
S.  pseudobrowniana  a propensity  for  a semi-terrestrial  or  even  entirely  terrestrial  way  of 
life.  S.  birigida,  for  example,  was  found  in  wet  leaf  litter,  and  exploration  of  its  habitat 
revealed  it  to  be  living  among  wet  fallen  leaves  and  on  the  soil  surface  at  all  times  of  the 
year,  in  a climate  where  the  temperature  reaches  30-35°C  in  summer  and  may  fall  as  low  as 
-5°C  in  winter,  when  the  area  is  often  covered  with  snow.  S.  audax  was  described  as  a truly 
terrestrial  species. 

This  preference  of  species  of  Scottia  for  habitats  that  lead  to  a semi-terrestrial  or  even 
terrestrial  way  of  life  is  reflected  in  the  affinities  of  the  genus  which  lie  with  ostracods, 
most  of  which  have  been  described  relatively  recently,  that  have  similar  habits.  Scottia  is 
assigned  to  the  Subfamily  Scottiinae  (of  the  Family  Cyprididae,  Superfamily  Cypridoidea), 
the  only  other  members  of  which  are  Mesocypris  and  the  recently  described 
Austromesocypris , neither  of  which  has  British  representatives,  and  all  of  which  show  a 
marked  preference  for  terrestrial  or  semi-terrestrial  habitats.  The  vast  majority  of  members 
of  other  subfamilies  of  the  Cyprididae,  which  are  common  and  diverse  in  non-marine 
waters,  are  fully  aquatic.  That  ostracods  include  truly  terrestrial  taxa  was  not  known  until 
1953,  when  Mesocypris  terrestris  was  described  from  forest  humus  in  the  Knysna  Forest, 
South  Africa.  Of  this  species  Harding  (1953)  gives  a well-illustrated  account.  It  is 
interesting  that  there  is  nothing  in  its  morphology  that  immediately  indicates  that  its  habits 
are  terrestrial  and  not  aquatic.  An  earlier  known  species  of  this  genus,  M.  pubescens,  was 
already  known  as  a frequenter  of  wet  moss  in  the  splash  zone  of  a waterfall  and  similar 
situations  in  Kenya  (Klie,  1939),  but  M.  terrestris  has  taken  the  tendency  to  emancipate 
itself  from  water  even  further.  Since  its  discovery,  two  more  species  of  Mesocypris  have 
been  found  to  be  terrestrial,  as  have  three  species  of  Austromesocypris  from  Australia 
(Martens  et  al.,  2004).  Mesocypris  and  Austromesocypris  are  believed  to  be  more  closely 
related  to  each  other  than  to  Scottia  and  have  been  recognised  as  constituting  a tribe,  the 
Mesocypridini,  while  Scottia  has  been  allocated  to  a second  tribe,  the  Scottiini. 

The  discovery  that  some  ostracods  have  adopted  terrestrial  habits  led  to  searches  and 
discoveries  elsewhere  (e.g.  Danielopol  & Betsch,  1980;  De  Deckker,  1983);  indeed  we  now 
know  that  the  terrestrial  mode  of  life  has  arisen  more  than  once  among  ostracods. 
Terrestrial  species  not  closely  related  to  the  Scottiinae  have  been  found  in  widely  scattered 
parts  of  the  world,  and  most  are  related  to  freshwater  taxa.  For  example  there  are  terrestrial 
representatives  of  the  subfamilies  Callistocypridinae  and  Candoninae  (family  Candonidae) 
and  Terrestricypridinae  (family  Cyprididae),  all  belonging  to  the  superfamily  Cypridoidea, 
as  well  as  the  family  Darwinulidae  (superfamily  Darwinuloidea)  (Pinto  et  al.,  2003,  2004, 
2005;  Martens  & Home,  2009).  The  route  from  freshwater,  via  damp  mosses  and  leaf  litter, 
seems  an  obvious  one.  More  surprising,  perhaps,  has  been  the  discovery  of  a completely 
separate  superfamily,  the  Terrestricytheroidea,  making  the  transition  to  terrestrial  habitats 
from  marine  and  brackish  water  environments.  Schomikov  (1969)  found  in  Iturup,  one  of 
the  Kuril  Islands  north-east  of  Japan,  an  ostracod  that  he  described  as  Terre stricy there 
pratensis,  which  he  found  living  in  a coastal  locality  among  small  pebbles  which  were 
always  kept  damp  by  mist,  rain  and  sea  spray.  The  same  author  described  a second  species 


30 


The  Ostracod  Scottia  pseudobrownian  Kempf 

of  the  genus  from  a monsoonal  salt  marsh  with  brackish  groundwater  at  a coastal  site  near 
Vladivostok,  and  also  recorded  T.  pratensis  living  nearby  among  supralittoral  salt-tolerant 
plants  (Schomikov,  1969).  Two  more  species  of  Terre stricy there  were  discovered  in 
England,  one  (which  remains  un-named)  represented  by  a single  male  specimen  found  in 
an  intertidal  rock  pool  on  the  Bristol  Channel  coast,  the  other,  described  as  T.  elisabethae, 
by  a large  population  inhabiting  a shaded  locality  on  a tidal  creek  in  Hampshire,  where  the 
animals  were  found  crawling  among  damp  leaves  (Home  et  al.,  2004).  More  recently, 
further  species  have  come  to  light  in  Japan  (Hiruta  et  al.,  2007)  and  the  Black  Sea 
(Schomikov  & Syrtlanova,  2008).  It  is  clear  that  adaptation  to  terrestrial  habitats  was  an 
entirely  independent  evolutionary  venture  for  Terre str icy ther e , not  only  because  it 
originated  in  marine/brackish-water  rather  than  freshwater  habitats,  but  because  it 
constitutes  a separate  superfamily  only  distantly  related  to  other  terrestrial  ostracods.  While 
the  Terrestricytheroidea,  Darwinuloidea  and  Cypridoidea  all  belong  to  the  same  order,  the 
Podocopida,  each  is  very  distinct.  Although  no  fossil  representative  has  yet  been 
recognised,  the  Terrestricytheroidea  may  be  a very  ancient  superfamily,  possibly  hundreds 
of  millions  of  years  old  (Home,  2003;  Home  et  al.,  2004). 

Convergent  evolution  of  terrestrial  and  semi-terrestrial  habits  in 

OSTRACODS  AND  OTHER  SMALL  CRUSTACEANS 

The  acquisition  of  terrestrial  and  semi-terrestrial  habits  by  ostracods  involved  the  solution 
of  ecological  and  physiological  problems.  Although  small,  the  animals  concerned  are  often 
too  large  and  bulky  to  live  completely  within  the  thin  film  of  water  that  covers  surfaces  in 
damp  situations  (which  is  otherwise  sufficiently  “deep”  for  protozoans,  rotifers,  tardigrades 
and  even  harpacticoid  copepods).  Many,  if  not  all,  ostracods  (aquatic  as  well  as  terrestrial) 
are  capable  of  surviving  adverse  conditions  by  sealing  themselves  tight  shut  inside  their 
carapaces,  and  this  undoubtedly  serves  them  well  if  terrestrial  environments  become  too 
dry.  However,  at  least  some  terrestrial  ostracods  are  capable  of  continuing  to  move  in 
relatively  dry  conditions,  dragging  with  them  a small  bubble  of  water  as  they  crawl,  as  was 
observed  and  illustrated  for  Terre  str  icy  there  elisabethae  by  Home  et  al.  (2004).  In  this  they 
are  aided  by  having  “hairy”  carapaces,  furnished  with  abundant  sensilla  that  are 
particularly  densely  spaced,  and  sometimes  brush-like,  around  the  ventral  margins  of  the 
valves,  which  help  to  retain  water.  However,  while  some  taxa  (e.g.  Terre  stricy  there , some 
species  of  Mesocypris  and  Scottia)  are  abundantly  adorned  with  such  sensilla,  others, 
including  S.  birigida  and  S.  pseudobrowniana  are  not  particularly  well-endowed  in  this 
respect  although  the  latter,  at  least,  displays  rows  of  closely-spaced  sensilla  near  the  free 
outer  margins  of  the  valves  (Fig.  2D)  . It  may  be  that  the  degree  of  “hirsuteness”  of  these 
ostracods  is  a reflection  of  how  far  along  the  adaptive  path  to  terrestrial  habits  they  have 
progressed,  but  there  is  clearly  much  to  learn  about  how  these  animals  cope  with  their 
environment. 

Semi-terrestrial  habits  have  evolved  also  in  branchiopod  crustaceans  of  the  Order 
Anomopoda  that  are  very  distantly  related  to  ostracods  and  provide  a remarkable  example 
of  convergent  evolution.  The  branchiopod  exponents  of  this  way  of  life  are  members  of  the 
family  Chydoridae  which,  like  many  ostracods,  are  predominantly  crawlers.  They  live  in 
wet  moss  on  forest  floors  and  among  mosses  growing  on  tree  trunks  in  cloud  forests  where 
the  air  is  saturated  with  moisture  for  most  of  the  time.  All  are  very  small,  which  enables 
them  to  live  in  small  interstices  among  moss  leaves  where  a film  of  water  is  easily  retained. 
Thus  the  first  two  terrestrial  species  to  be  described,  by  Frey  (1980),  which  he  assigned  to  a 
new  genus  Bryospilus,  are  no  more  than  0.35mm  in  length  and  are  among  the  smallest 
known  chydorids.  Fike  ostracods  they  have  a functionally  bivalved  carapace,  but  in  their 
case  this  is  a single,  folded  structure  with  no  dorsal  hinge,  although  its  two  valves  can  be 
brought  together  by  means  of  adductor  muscles,  just  as  can  those  of  the  hinged  bivalved 
carapace  of  ostracods.  They  crawl  by  the  use  of  the  trunk  limbs,  assisted  at  times  by 
levering  with  a median  post-abdomen  that  is  the  functional  equivalent  of  the  posteriorly- 
located  furca  (or  uropods)  of  many  cypridoidean  ostracods,  including  terrestrial  species. 


31 


The  Ostracod  Scottia  pseudobrownian  Kempf 

The  antennae,  used  for  propulsion  when  anomopods  swim  (which  most  of  them  can),  or, 
less  frequently,  for  levering  them  through  detritus,  are  reduced  in  size  and  play  no  part  in 
locomotion.  In  this  respect  semi-terrestrial  chydorids  are  unique  among  anomopods.  The 
small  size  of  these  animals  presumably  enables  them  to  retain  water  within  the  carapace 
chamber  when  living  in  a thin  film  of  it.  Bryospilus  proves  to  be  a very  distinctive  genus, 
not  closely  related  to  previously  known  genera.  Among  its  peculiarities  is  that  it  lacks  the 
single  compound  eye  (derived  from  two  fused  eyes)  possessed  by  most  anomopods,  but  it 
retains  the  small  ocellus.  The  first  semi-terrestrial  chydorids,  of  which  Frey  (1980)  gave 
excellent  illustrations,  were  found  in  damp  forests  in  New  Zealand,  Venezuela  and  Puerto 
Rico.  Additional  species,  one  of  them  allocated  to  a new  genus,  with  similar  habits,  have 
since  been  described  from  wet  forests  in  West  Africa  (Chiambeng  & Dumont,  1998). 

The  other  group  of  small  crustaceans  that  is  well  represented  in  freshwater,  the 
Copepoda,  also  includes  a few  species  that  have  emancipated  themselves  from  truly  aquatic 
conditions.  Unlike  ostracods  and  anomopods,  copepods  lack  an  enveloping  carapace  that 
can  retain  water.  One  member  of  the  Cyclopoida,  Ectocy clops  phaleratus,  which  has 
creeping  habits  and  can  move  over  wet  surfaces,  pushing  a film  of  water  with  it  (as  perhaps 
can  its  congeners),  may  exhibit  a potentially  early  stage  in  the  evolution  of  terrestrial 
habits.  Already  better- adapted  to  a semi-terrestrial  life,  however,  are  various  smaller, 
creeping  species,  often  no  more  than  0.5  mm  in  length,  that  belong  to  several  genera  whose 
relationships  are  uncertain.  These,  whose  four  pairs  of  locomotory  thoracic  limbs  have 
short  rami,  often  reduced  to  two  segments  from  the  basic  three,  often  live  among  mosses, 
in  springs,  seepages  and  groundwater.  British  representatives  are  few  but  include 
Speocyclops  demetiensis,  two  of  whose  three  recorded  sites  in  Britain  are  in  Yorkshire,  and 
Graeteriella  unisetiger. 

Perhaps  even  better  exponents  of  such  habits  are  found  among  the  Harpacticoida, 
freshwater  representatives  of  which  are  predominantly  crawlers  rather  than  swimmers,  and 
of  which  some  frequent  wet  moss  or  the  leaf  carpet  of  woodlands  where  they  use  their 
thoracic  legs  as  oars  when  they  “row”  through  a thin  film  of  water,  or  as  levers  where  the 
film  is  thinner.  Species  of  Maraenobiotus  and  Epactophanes,  both  of  which  have  British 
representatives,  live  in  wet  (or  sometimes  even  only  damp)  moss  and  occasionally  among 
decaying  leaves  or  on  moist  peat.  In  Yorkshire  two  species  of  Moraria , one  very  common, 
the  other  much  less  so,  usually  frequent  Sphagnum,  another  has  been  found  in  a seepage, 
and  two  other  species  of  the  genus  have  been  found  in  the  leaf  carpet  of  woods  (Fryer, 
1993). 

While  of  less  relevance  in  the  present  context,  for  completeness  it  can  be  mentioned 
very  briefly  that  various  larger,  malacostracan  crustaceans  have  also  to  a large  degree 
adopted  terrestrial  habits.  Large  size  is  beneficial  in  that,  for  example,  surface  area  to 
volume  ratios  are  more  advantageous  in  combating  losses  by  evaporation  and  a thick,  more 
water-retaining  cuticle  can  be  employed  than  in  minute  animals  - though  terrestrial 
crustaceans  lack  the  waxy  layer  of  epicuticle  typical  of  other  terrestrial  arthropods.  Gills 
can  also  be  housed  in  an  enclosed  humid  chamber,  as  they  are  in  crabs  that  adopt  such 
habits. 

Most  successful  on  land  have  been  the  isopods  which,  as  well  as  being  very  diverse  in 
the  oceans  where  they  have,  for  example,  given  rise  to  a spectacular  array  of  deep  sea 
forms,  are  well  represented  on  land  as  the  wood  lice.  Amphipods  have  been  less  successful 
in  this  respect,  though  “beach-hoppers”  are  common  on  sea  coasts,  but  a few  species  thrive 
in  the  damp  tropics  and  one  semi-terrestrial  invader,  Orchestia  cavimana , has  been  found 
in  Yorkshire.  Various  crabs  are  highly  successful  in  terrestrial  habitats  - the  Coconut  Crab 
Birgus  latro  even  climbs  trees  - but  many  retain  aquatic  larval  stages,  which  means  that 
adults  have  to  return  to  the  sea  to  reproduce  and  are  therefore  restricted  in  their  ability  to 
venture  far  inland.  Some  freshwater  crabs,  which  have  eliminated  larval  stages  from  the 
life  cycle,  roam  freely  on  land,  especially  when  conditions  are  moist.  Perhaps  surprisingly, 
hermit  crabs  of  the  genus  Coenobita  have  successfully  colonised  terrestrial  habitats,  where 
they  use  the  shells  of  terrestrial  snails  as  “homes”,  but  have  to  return  to  the  sea  to  breed. 


32 


The  Ostracod  Scottia  pseudobrownian  Kempf 

Nevertheless  the  New  World  C.  clypeatus  is  a highly  successful  species  in  the  Caribbean 
and  adjacent  mainland  areas. 

Tailpiece 

When,  just  over  120  years  ago,  Thomas  Scott  discovered  the  ostracod  whose  name 
perpetuates  his  memory,  and  George  Stewardson  Brady  and  Alfred  Merle  Norman 
described  it,  they  had  no  idea  that  it  would  eventually  prove  to  be  related  to  terrestrial 
species  whose  existence  was  then  not  even  suspected,  and  were  not  to  begin  to  be  known 
until  more  than  60  years  later.  Nor  did  they  know  that  their  findings,  with  those  of  later 
naturalists,  would  enable  its  ecological  preferences,  habits  and  morphological  attributes  to 
be  compared  with  those  of  other  ostracods,  both  related  and  unrelated,  and  throw  light  on 
the  route  or  routes  whereby  these  seemingly  unlikely  animals  have  come  to  occupy  semi- 
and  fully  terrestrial  niches.  In  recalling  this  chain  of  events  the  role  of  three  pioneers  in  the 
study  of  small  crustaceans  is  inevitably  and  happily  remembered. 

Acknowledgments 

Andy  Godfrey  would  like  to  thank  the  Environment  Agency  (York  office)  who  funded  the 
project  which  was  aimed  at  studying  the  ecology  of  the  Red  Data  Book  1 and  UK 
Biodiversity  Action  Plan  soldier-fly  Odontomyia  hydroleon.  Werner  Hollwedel  kindly 
informed  us  that  the  term  “Schachtelhalm”,  translated  as  “shavegrass”  (which  we  were 
unable  to  equate  with  any  common  English  name),  in  fact  refers  to  “horsetails”,  the 
common  name  for  Equisetum.  We  thank  Gilly  Walsh-Kemmis  (nee  McCall)  for  supplying 
coordinates  for  the  Irish  record  of  Scottia  pseudobrowniana. 

References 

Bates,  M.R.,  Keen,  D.H.,  Whittaker,  J.E.,  Merry,  J.S.  and  Wenban-Smith,  F.F.  (2002) 
Middle  Pleistocene  molluscan  and  ostracod  faunas  from  Allhallows,  Kent,  UK.  Proc. 
Geol.  Assoc.  113:  223-236. 

Brady,  G.S.  and  Norman,  A.M.  (1889)  A monograph  of  the  marine  and  freshwater 
Ostracoda  of  the  North  Atlantic  and  of  Northwestern  Europe,  Section  1 , Podocopa.  Sci. 
Trans.  Roy.  Soc.  Dublin  series  2,  4:  63-270. 

Brady,  G.S.  and  Norman,  A.M.  (1896)  A monograph  of  the  marine  and  freshwater 
Ostracoda  of  the  North  Atlantic  and  of  Northwestern  Europe,  Sections  2-4, 
Myodocopa,  Cladopocopa  and  Platycopa.  Sci.  Trans.  Roy.  Soc.  Dublin  series  2,  5: 
621-746. 

Chapman,  M.A.  (1961)  The  terrestrial  ostracod  of  New  Zealand,  Mesocypris  audax  sp.  nov. 
Crustaceana  2:  255-261. 

Chapman,  A (1963)  A review  of  the  freshwater  ostracods  of  New  Zealand.  Hydrobiologia 
22:  1-40. 

Chiambeng,  G.Y.  and  Dumont,  H.J.  (1998)  New  semi-terrsterial  chydorids  from  the 
tropical  rainforest  of  northwest  Cameroon  (Africa):  Nicsmirnovius  camerounensis 
n.  gen.  n.  sp.  and  Bryospilus  africanus  n.  sp.  (Crustacea:  Anomopoda).  Hydrobiologia 
391:  259-270. 

Cole,  M.E.  (1966)  Four  genera  of  ostracods  from  Tennessee  ( Darwinula , Limnocy there , 
Ilyocypris  and  Scottia ).  J.  Tennessee  Acad.  Sci.  41:  135-146. 

Danielopol,  D.L.  and  Betsch,  J.M.  (1980)  Ostracodes  terrestres  de  Madagascar: 
systematique,  origine,  adaptations.  Revue  Ecol.  Biol.  Sol.  17:  87-123. 

Danielopol,  D.L.,  Home,  D.J.  and  Wood,  R.N.  (1996)  Notes  on  the  ecology  of  Metacypris 
cordata  (Ostracoda,  Timiriaseviinae);  why  does  it  not  colonise  groundwater  habitats? 
In:  Keen,  M.C.  (ed.),  Proc.  2nd  European  Ostracodologists’  Meeting,  Glasgow  1993, 
175-180,  British  Micropalaeontological  Society,  London. 

Danielopol,  D.L.  and  Vespremeanu,  E.E.  (1964)  The  presence  of  ostracods  on  floating  fen 
soil  in  Romania.  Fragm.  Balcan.  5:  29-36. 

De  Deckker,  P.  (1979)  Middle  Pleistocene  ostracod  fauna  of  the  West  Runton  Freshwater 


33 


The  Ostracod  Scottia  pseudobrownian  Kempf 

Bed,  Norfolk.  Palaeontology  22:  293-316. 

De  Deckker,  P.  (1980)  On  Scottia  audax  (Chapman).  Stereo-Atlas  Ostracod  Shells  7: 
37-44. 

De  Deckker,  P.  (1983)  Terrestrial  ostracods  in  Australia.  In:  Lowry,  J.  K.  (ed.)  The 
conference  on  the  biology  and  evolution  of  Crustacea.  Mem.  Austral.  Nat.  Mus.  18: 
87-100. 

Douglas,  D.  J.  and  McCall,  G.  (1992)  The  freshwater  Ostracoda  of  Ireland.  Bull.  Irish 
Biogeogr.  Soc.  15:  91-109. 

Forester,  R.M.,  Smith,  A.J.,  Palmer,  D.F.  and  Curry,  B.B.  (2005)  North  American  Non- 
Marine  Ostracode  Database  “NANODe”  Version  1:  http://www.kent.edu/NANODe, 
Kent  State  University,  Ohio. 

Frey,  D.G.  (1980)  The  non-swimming  Chydorid  Cladocera  of  wet  forests,  with 
descriptions  of  a new  genus  and  two  new  species.  Int.  Rev.  Hydrobiol.  Hydrogr.  65: 
613-641. 

Fryer,  G.  (1993)  The  Freshwater  Crustacea  of  Yorkshire.  A Faunistic  and  Ecological 
Survey.  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union  and  Leeds  Philosophical  and  Literary  Society, 
Leeds. 

Harding,  J.P.  (1953)  The  first  known  example  of  a terrestrial  ostracod,  Mesocypris 
terrestris  sp.  nov.  Ann.  Natal  Mus.  12:  359-365. 

Henderson,  P.A.  (1990)  Freshwater  Ostracods.  Synopses  of  the  British  Fauna  (New  Series) 
42.  Universal  Book  Services/Dr  W Backhuys,  Leiden. 

Hiruta,  S.F.,  Hiruta,  S.  and  Mawatari,  S.F.  (2007)  A new,  interstitial  species  of 
Terre  str  icy  there  (Crustacea:  Ostracoda)  and  its  microdistribution  at  Orito  Beach, 
northeastern  Sea  of  Japan.  Hydrobiologia  585:  453-456. 

Home,  D.  J.  (2003)  Key  events  in  the  ecological  radiation  of  the  Ostracoda.  In:  Park,  L.E. 
& A. J. Smith  (eds),  Bridging  the  Gap:  trends  in  the  ostracode  biological  and  geological 
sciences.  Paleontol.  Soc.  Pap.  9:  181-201 . 

Home,  D.J.,  Baltanas,  A.  and  Paris,  G.  (1998)  Geographical  distribution  of  reproductive 
modes  in  living  non-marine  ostracods.  In:  Martens,  K.  (ed.),  Sex  and  Parthenogenesis: 
evolutionary  ecology  of  reproductive  modes  in  non-marine  ostracods,  77-99, 
Backhuys,  Leiden. 

Home,  D.J.,  Smith,  R.J.,  Whittaker  and  Murray,  J.W.  (2004)  The  first  British  record  and  a 
new  species  of  the  superfamily  Terrestricytheroidea  (Cmstacea,  Ostracoda): 
morphology,  ontogeny,  lifestyle  and  phylogeny.  Zool.  J.  Linn.  Soc.  142:  253-288. 

Jones,  T.R.  1850.  Description  of  the  Entomostraca  of  the  Pleistocene  beds  of  Newbury, 
Copford,  Clacton  and  Grays.  Ann.  Mag.  nat.  Hist.  6:  25-28. 

Kempf,  E.K.  (1971)  Okologie,  Taxonomie  und  Verbreitung  der  nichtmarinen  Ostrakoden  - 
Gattung  Scottia  im  Quartar  von  Europe.  Eiszeitalter.  Gegenw.  22:  43-63. 

Klie,  W.  (1938)  Krebstiere  oder  Cmstacea,  III:  Ostracoda,  Muschelkrebse.  Die  Tierwelt 
Deutschlands  34,  Gustav  Fisher,  Jena. 

Klie,  W.  (1939)  Ostracoden  aus  dem  Kenia-Gebiet,  vomehmlich  von  dessen  Hochgebirgen. 
Int.  Rev.  Hydrobiol.  39:  99-161 . 

Kiilkoyliioglu,  O.  (2003)  A new  report  and  the  loss  of  Scottia  pseudobrowniana 
Kempf,  1971  (Ostracoda)  from  a limnocrene  spring  in  Bolu,  Turkey.  Crustaceana  76: 
257-268. 

Kiilkoyliioglu,  O.  (2005)  Ecological  requirements  of  freshwater  Ostracoda  (Cmstacea) 
in  two  limnocrene  springs  (Bolu,  Turkey).  Annls  Limnologie  41:  237-246. 

Kiilkoyliioglu,  O.  and  Vinyard,  G.L.  (2000)  Distribution  and  ecology  of  freshwater 
Ostracoda  (Cmstacea)  collected  from  springs  of  Nevada,  Idaho  and  Oregon:  a 
preliminary  study.  Western  North  Amer.  Nat.  60:  291-303. 

Martens,  K.  and  Home,  DJ.  (2009)  Ostracoda.  In:  Likens,  G.E.  (ed.),  Encyclopedia  of 
Inland  Waters,  405-414.  Elsevier  Ltd.,  Amsterdam. 

Lowndes,  A.G.  (1930)  Some  rare  and  little-known  British  freshwater  ostracods.  Rep. 
Marlborough  Coll.  Nat.  Hist.  Soc.  No.  79:  82-112. 


34 


The  Ostracod  Scottia  pseudobrownian  Kempf 

Martens,  K.,  De  Deckker,  P.  and  Rossetti,  G.  (2004)  On  a new  terrestrial  genus  and  species 
of  Scottiinae  (Crustacea,  Ostracoda)  from  Australia,  with  a discussion  on  the 
phylogeny  and  the  zoogeography  of  the  subfamily.  Zool.  Anz.  243:  21-36. 

Meisch,  C.  (2000)  Freshwater  Ostracoda  of  western  and  central  Europe.  Siisswasserfauna 
von  Mitteleuropa  8/3.,  Spektrum  Akademischer  Verlag,  Heidleberg/Berlin. 

Pinto,  R.L.,  Da  Rocha,  C.E.F.  and  Martens,  K.  (2003)  On  two  new  species  of  the  genus 
Vestalenula  Rossetti  and  Martens,  1998  (Crustacea,  Ostracoda,  Darwinulidae)  from 
semi-terrestrial  habitats  in  Sao  Paulo  State  (Brazil).  Zool.  J.  Linn.  Soc.  139:  305-313. 
Pinto,  R.L.,  Da  Rocha,  C.E.F.  and  Martens,  K.  (2004)  On  the  genus  Penthesilenula  Rossetti 
and  Martens,  1998  (Crustacea,  Ostracoda,  Darwinulidae)  from  (semi-)terrestrial 
habitats  in  Sao  Paulo  State  (Brazil),  with  the  description  of  two  new  species.  J.  Nat. 
Hist.  38:  2567-2589. 

Pinto,  R.L.,  Da  Rocha,  C.E.F.  and  Martens,  K.  (2005)  On  new  terrestrial  ostracods 
(Crustacea:  Ostracoda)  from  Brazil,  primarily  from  Sao  Paulo  State.  Zool.  J.  Linn.  Soc. 
145:  145-173. 

Robinson,  J.E.  (1980)  The  ostracod  fauna  of  the  interglacial  deposits  at  Sugworth, 
Oxfordshire.  Phil.  Trans.  Roy.  SocLond.  (B)  289:  99-106. 

Schomikov,  E.I.  (1969)  Novoe  semeystvo  rakushkovykh  rachkov  (Ostracoda)  iz 
supralitorali  Kurilskikh  Ostrovov  (A  new  family  of  Ostracoda  from  the  supralittoral 
zone  of  Kuril  Islands).  Zool.  Zhurn.  45:  32-49.  [Russian  with  English  abstract] 
Schomikov,  E.I.  (1980)  Ostracody  v nazemnykh  biotopakh  (Ostracodes  in  terrestrial 
biotopes).  Zool.  Zhurn.  59:  1306-1319.  [Russian  with  English  abstract] 

Schomikov,  E.I  . and  Syrtlanova,  N.M.  (2008)  A new  species  of  Terre  str  icy  there  from  the 
Black  Sea,  in  zones  of  gas  seepage.  Senckenb.  leth.  88:  121-126. 

Smith,  R.J.,  Matzke-Karasz,  R.,  Kamiya,  T.  and  Ikeda,  Y.  (2002)  Scottia  birigida  sp.  nov. 
(Cypridoidea:  Ostracoda)  from  western  Honshu,  Japan  and  a key  to  the  subfamily 
Scottiinae  Bronstein,  1947.  Zootaxa  126:  1-20. 

Swain,  F.M.  (1999)  Fossil  nonmarine  Ostracoda  of  the  United  States.  Developments  in 
Palaeontology  & Stratigraphy  16:  1-401. 

Triebel,  E.  (1941)  Die  ersten  Ostrakoden  aus  der  Paludinenbank.  Z.  Geschiebeforsch.  17: 
61-75. 

Whittaker,  J.E.  and  Home,  D.J.  (2009)  Pleistocene.  In:  Whittaker,  J.E.  & Hart,  M.B.  (eds), 
Ostracods  in  British  Stratigraphy,  447-467.  The  Micropalaeontological  Society  Special 
Publications,  The  Geological  Society,  London. 

BOOK  REVIEW 

Palms  of  Southern  Asia  by  Andrew  Henderson.  Pp.  199  (inch  line  illustrations  & 336 
maps),  plus  64  pages  of  coloured  plates.  Princeton  University  Press,  Princeton  & Oxford. 
2009.  £53.00  hardvack. 

Although  rather  an  exotic  title  for  most  readers  of  The  Naturalist,  this  is  an  exemplary  field 
guide  in  presenting  a wealth  of  taxonomic,  ecological  and  biogeographical  information 
within  the  compass  of  a relatively  small  volume.  The  pages  are  packed  with  succinct  but 
informative  data  (including  detailed  keys  and  maps)  on  352  naturally  occurring  palms  in 
southern  Asia. 

The  author,  Andrew  Henderson  (Curator  at  the  New  York  Botanical  Garden),  will  be 
known  to  some  of  us  as  one  of  the  speakers  at  the  Linnean  Society  Conference  on  the 
Yorkshire  botanist  Richard  Spruce,  held  at  York  University  in  September  1993.  His 
contribution  on  ‘Richard  Spruce  and  the  palms  of  the  Amazon  and  Andes’  is  to  be  found  in 
Richard  Spruce  (1817-1893)  Botanist  and  Explorer  edited  by  M.R.D.  Seaward  and  S.M.D. 
Fitzgerald  (1997)  - see  The  Naturalist  122:  24-26  (1997). 


MRDS 


35 


THE  STATUS  OF  MOORLAND  BREEDING  BIRDS  IN 
THE  PEAK  DISTRICT  NATIONAL  PARK  2004 

PETER  MIDDLETON 

33  Wilthorpe  Road,  Redbrook,  Barnsley  S75  1JA 
and 

GEOFF  CARR 

300  Higham  Common  Road,  Higham,  Barnsley  S751PF 

The  decline  of  lowland  farmland  breeding  birds  in  the  UK  is  now  well  documented  and 
reasonably  understood,  but  does  this  national  trend  also  extend  to  upland  breeding  birds?  A 
survey  of  the  upland  breeding  birds  of  the  Peak  District  National  Park  was  conducted  in 
1990  by  AJF.Brown  and  K.Shepherd  and  various  other  sample  surveys  have  been 
conducted  by  the  RSPB,  the  National  Trust,  the  Peak  District  National  Park  Authority  and 
English  Nature,  but  it  is  14  years  since  the  whole  area  was  surveyed  for  upland  breeding 
birds.  This  article  presents  a summary  of  the  results  from  a repeat  Moorland  Breeding  Bird 
Survey  of  the  Peak  District  National  Park  in  2004  conducted  by  the  Moors  for  the  Future 
Partnership  and  funded  by  the  Heritage  Lottery  Fund. 

The  moors  of  the  Peak  District  National  Park  present  a diversity  of  breeding  bird 
habitats  of  national  importance.  Nevertheless,  the  Peak  District  moorland  has  suffered 
significant  losses  and  degradation  of  moorland  habitats  through  fringe  agricultural 
improvement,  past  poor  management  of  burning  and  grazing  regimes  and  plantation 
afforestation.  Surrounded  on  all  sides  by  the  heavy  industry  of  northern  England,  the 
vegetation  of  the  Peak  District  has  also  been  severely  degraded  by  atmospheric  pollution. 
Furthermore,  the  area  is  within  close  proximity  to  huge  urban  areas  and  this  has  resulted  in 
enormous  visitor  pressure.  The  designation  as  Britain’s  first  national  park,  rights  of  access 
to  large  areas  of  wilderness  through  open  access  agreements  and  the  increase  in  car 
ownership  has  resulted  in  huge  numbers  of  visitors  engaging  in  an  array  of  activities 
throughout  the  year.  In  spite  of  this,  the  Peak  District  retains  the  most  southerly  viable 
populations  of  typical  moorland  breeding  birds  in  England.  For  a number  of  species, 
particularly  European  Golden  Plover  Pluvialis  apricaria,  the  South  Pennines  Peak  District 
may  hold  the  most  southerly  breeding  populations  in  the  world. 

The  2004  survey  covered  the  unenclosed  upland  area  of  the  Peak  District  National 
Park.  It  was  therefore  mainly  concentrated  within  the  SSSIs  of  the  Dark  Peak  (between 
Edale  in  the  South  and  Marsden  in  the  north),  the  Eastern  Moors  and  the  South-West  Peak 
(Staffordshire  moors  between  Buxton  and  Leek).  The  1990  census  covered  the  Dark  Peak 
and  South  Pennines  as  far  north  as  Ilkley.  Therefore  to  analyse  the  population  trends  and 
spatial  distribution  of  breeding  birds  it  was  necessary  to  deduct  the  data  from  the  northern 
section  north  of  Marsden  from  the  1990  survey. 

The  Peak  District  vegetation 

An  important  correlation  exists  between  the  breeding  birds  of  the  Peak  District  moorlands 
and  the  vegetation  of  the  area,  which  in  turn  influences  both  densities  and  the  distribution 
of  typical  moorland  birds.  The  vegetation  of  the  Peak  District  moors  can  broadly  be 
described  in  terms  of  five  vegetation  types,  each  associated  with  particular  facets  of 
topography  or  management.  The  vegetation  generally  is  severely  degraded  and  much  of  the 
SSSIs  have  been  designated  by  English  Nature  as  being  in  unfavourable  condition. 

On  the  plateau  of  the  Dark  Peak,  where  the  depth  of  peat  can  exceed  four  metres,  the 
vegetation  is  dominated  by  Eriophorum  vaginatum.  Relatively  huge  expanses  of  this 
vegetation  exist  on  the  moorlands  and  it  is  particularly  characteristic  of  the  South  Pennines 
blanket  bog  (Ratcliffe,  1997;  Brown  & Shepherd,  1991).  E.  angustifolium  can  be  abundant 
along  the  edges  of  pools  and  where  the  peat  is  eroded;  typical  associates  are  Calluna 
vulgaris,  Empetrum  nigrum,  Vaccinium  myrtillus  and  Rubus  chamaemorus.  Although  these 


Naturalist  135  (2010) 


36  The  Status  of  Moorland  Breeding  Birds  in  the  Peak  District  National  Park  2004 

blanket  bogs  are  amongst  the  most  species  poor  floras  in  Britain  they  are  unique  and 
support  high  densities  of  European  Golden  Plover  and  nationally  important  numbers  of 
Dunlin  Calidris  alpina.  The  highest  densities  of  both  these  species  are  found  on 
Eriophorum  bog  that  contains  abundant  Empetrum  nigrum  and  Rubus  chamaemorus . The 
latter  is  certainly  characteristic  of  moorlands  that  support  high  densities  of  these  waders.  In 
contrast  there  are  extensive  areas  devoid  of  vegetation  that  are  seriously  eroding  and  in 
these  areas  birds  are  at  very  low  densities  or  absent.  The  present  extent  of  peat  occurred 
some  4000  years  ago  and  severe  erosion  is  perhaps  part  of  a natural  cycle  due  to  climate 
change.  However,  this  process  has  been  accelerated  by  un-natural  events  such  as  moorland 
fires,  overgrazing,  increased  public  access,  atmospheric  pollution  and  particularly  acid 
precipitation  (Anderson  & Yalden,  1998).  The  latter  is  thought  to  be  responsible  for  the  loss 
of  peat-forming  sphagnum  mosses  in  the  mid- 18th  century.  Once  peat  is  exposed  it  is 
particularly  vulnerable  to  erosion  and  oxidization  that  prevents  colonisation  of  plants,  thus 
it  remains  bare  and  the  process  accelerates. 

Away  from  the  plateau  the  vegetation  of  the  moorland  slopes  is  mostly  dominated  by 
Heather,  and  these  areas  are  mostly  managed  for  Red  Grouse  Lagopus  lagopus  scoticus.  As 
a consequence,  the  heather  moors  are  burned  at  regular  intervals  to  provide  nutritious 
young  shoots  for  the  grouse  to  forage.  Empetrum  nigrum  and  Vaccinium  myrtillus  are 
common  associates  and  the  latter  is  often  present  in  relative  abundance.  According  to 
Anderson  and  Yalden  (1981)  areas  dominated  by  pure  heather  in  the  northern  part  of  the 
Peak  District  appear  to  have  declined  by  some  35%  since  1913.  These  losses  are  thought  to 
have  resulted  from  past  overgrazing  and  poor  burning  management.  Peak  District  bird 
surveys  in  recent  years  have  revealed  that  these  pure  heather  moorland  or  monocultures 
attract  only  small  assemblages  of  moorland  birds  and  often  only  Red  Grouse  and  Meadow 
Pipit  Anthus  pratensis  are  present  in  such  areas.  However,  recent  heather  bums, 
particularly  on  wet  moors  with  regenerating  Eriophorum  angustifolium,  often  attract 
breeding  European  Golden  Plovers.  Emphasising  those  differences  in  land  management 
may  affect  breeding  bird  densities  (Sim  et  al.,  2005). 

Much  of  the  Heather  moorland  has  been  replaced  by  some  form  of  acid  grassland. 
These  areas  of  grassland  are  particularly  favoured  by  Sky  Lark  Alauda  arvensis,  Eurasian 
Curlew  Numenius  arquata  and  Meadow  Pipit,  the  latter  often  found  in  local  abundance. 
Acid  grassland  is  an  underestimated  resource,  indeed,  there  appears  to  be  a misconception 
that  extensive  heather  moorland  is  best  for  biodiversity  and  this  is  often  not  the  case. 
Molinia  caerulea  is  often  dominant  on  gentle,  wetter  slopes  where  it  usually  forms  a 
species  poor,  tussocky  sward.  Nardus  stricta  also  forms  smaller  but  similar  tussocks  and 
this  type  has  probably  spread  most  in  recent  times  as  a consequence  of  heavy  grazing,  this 
grass  is  unpalatable  to  sheep.  The  most  interesting  and  species  rich  acid  grassland  type 
found  in  the  Peak  District  is  Deschampsia  flexuosa.  It  often  occurs  on  the  steeper  ground 
and  it  is  particularly  palatable  to  sheep,  this  is  perhaps  the  reason  why  this  grassland  type  is 
not  more  abundant  in  the  area. 

J uncus  spp.  are  also  common  throughout  all  areas  of  the  Peak  District  where  water  is 
abundant  at  the  surface.  J.  efjusus  is  the  most  abundant  and  occurs  in  the  damp  places 
particularly  where  there  is  a marked  change  in  slope,  and  variable  sized  areas  of  Juncus 
also  occur  alongside  streams.  Two  species  of  birds  are  associated  with  this  habitat,  notably, 
Common  Snipe  Gallinago  gallinago  and  Reed  Bunting  Emberiza  schoeniclus. 

Cloughs,  tors  and  gritsone  edges,  with  their  associated  rock  litter  are  often  dominated 
by  Pteridium  aquilinum  which  may  invade  heather  or  acid  grassland.  This  vegetation  type 
is  a very  important  habitat  for  typical  moorland  birds  such  as  Northern  Wheatear  Oenanthe 
oenanthe , Whinchat  Saxicola  rubetra,  Common  Stonechat  S.  torquata  and  Ring  Ouzel 
Turdus  torquatus.  Whinchats  are  never  found  away  from  this  vegetation  type  and  Twite 
Carduelis  flavirostris  also  have  a strong  association  with  it. 

Clough  woodlands  containing  Quercus  sp.,  Betula  pendula  and  Sorbus  aucuparia 
occur  in  the  Peak  District  but  generally  they  are  considered  by  many  conservationists  as  a 
threat  to  the  important  moorland  habitats.  Nevertheless,  natural  regeneration  of  managed 


37 


The  Status  of  Moorland  Breeding  Birds  in  the  Peak  District  National  Park  2004 

and  fenced  areas  has  occurred  in  some  cloughs  and  as  a consequence,  an  assemblage  of 
birds  has  colonised  these  areas.  Lone  trees  high  in  cloughs  have  been  found  to  attract 
breeding  Willow  Warblers  Phylloscopus  trochilus.  Chaffinches  Fringilla  coelebs  and  Tit 
Parus  species  are  also  attracted  to  such  locations.  The  survey  also  revealed  that  Woodcocks 
Scolopax  rusticola  and  Redstarts  Phoenicurus  phoenicurus  breed  in  the  wooded  cloughs 
and,  as  these  trees  become  mature,  they  may  attract  Wood  Warblers  Phylloscopus  sibilatrix 
and  Pied  Flycatcher  Ficedula  hypoleuca. 

Results 

During  the  2004  survey,  data  were  gathered  concerning  the  distribution  and  numbers  of  39 
species  of  breeding  birds,  unlike  the  1990  survey  when  data  were  presented  for  27  species. 
However,  not  all  the  species  are  considered  typical  upland  breeding  birds  therefore 
discussion  on  the  numbers  and  distribution  change  will  be  largely  centered  upon  what  is 
considered  to  be  typical  of  moorland.  Notable  exceptions  include  some  wildfowl  species, 
Common  Buzzard  Buteo  buteo  and  Reed  Bunting.  Three  species  of  wildfowl  were  found 
breeding  on  the  Peak  District  moors  and  increases  in  their  numbers  have  occurred  since 
1990.  Three  pairs  of  Teal  Anas  crecca  were  found  in  2004  compared  to  none  in  1990  and 
likewise,  the  breeding  population  of  Mallard  Anas  platyrhynchos  has  increased  from  two 
pairs  in  1990  to  23  pairs  in  2004.  The  largest  increase  is  not  surprisingly  of  Greater  Canada 
Goose  Branta  canadensis.  Three  pairs  were  present  in  1990  compared  to  56  breeding  pairs 
in  2004,  also  many  more  birds  were  present  on  the  reservoirs.  These  birds  were  found 
grazing  at  all  altitudes  and  therefore  any  increase  in  population  could  result  in  additional 
pressure  on  the  moorland  vegetation. 

Raptors  have  also  seen  similar  increases  in  population  since  1990.  However,  the 
dramatic  increase  in  their  population  and  distribution  has  followed  the  cessation  of  much  of 
the  pesticide  usage  originally  responsible  for  their  population  crash.  Peregrine  Falcon 
Falco  peregrinus  and  Merlin  F.  colombarius  were  particularly  affected  and  it  was  not  until 
the  1980s  that  a slow  recovery  began.  Both  species  have  increased  their  populations  and 
distribution  in  the  Peak  District  since  1990.  Peregrines  have  increased  from  seven  pairs  in 
1990  to  25  pairs  in  2004.  Likewise  the  Merlin  has  increased  from  15  pairs  to  31  pairs. 
Common  Buzzards  have  also  increased  considerably  since  1990  when  only  a single  bird 
was  recorded  during  the  entire  survey.  During  the  2004  survey  Common  Buzzards  were 
recorded  in  20  1 km2  and  two  pairs  were  confirmed  as  breeding.  This  species  nevertheless 
remains  a scarce  breeder  in  the  Peak  District  in  spite  of  being  a common  resident  in  the 
lowlands  of  Derbyshire.  Likewise,  there  are  also  limiting  factors  inhibiting  the  successful 
colonization  by  Hen  Harrier  Circus  cyaneus.  This  species  successfully  bred  in  the  area  in 
1997  after  an  absence  of  approximately  200  years  (Frost,  1978),  however,  the 
establishment  of  a small  breeding  population  has  not  followed. 

Red  Grouse  is  a species  synonymous  with  heather  moorland,  and  where  this  habitat 
exists,  their  densities  are  highest.  Management  of  the  moors  appears  to  be  the  key  to  the 
species  range  and  abundance  over  time  and  therefore  the  heavily  managed  moors  have 
densities  in  excess  of  50  pairs/km2.  Interestingly,  on  the  heather  monocultures  where 
densities  of  Red  Grouse  are  greatest  the  overall  biodiversity  is  far  less  and  often  the  only 
other  bird  species  present  is  Meadow  Pipit.  A total  of  2337  individuals  was  recorded  in  the 
study  area  during  the  survey  in  1990  compared  to  5416  individuals  in  2004.  The  increase  in 
the  population  is  dramatic  and  therefore  may  reflect  the  intensive  management  that  occurs 
on  keepered  estates;  burning  is  much  more  evident  than  a number  of  years  ago.  Some 
caution  must  be  applied  when  considering  the  present  increase  in  numbers  because  these 
can  vary  significantly  from  year  to  year  resulting  from  a variety  of  factors,  particularly 
intestinal  parasites.  The  distribution  of  Red  Grouse  has  also  changed  considerably  and 
birds  were  found  in  422  km2  in  2004  compared  to  324  in  1990. 

Waders  overall,  within  the  Peak  District  National  Park  have  remained  stable  or 
increased  in  numbers;  the  only  exception  is  Dunlin  where  the  losses  are  directly  correlated 
with  the  loss  of  suitable  habitat  in  the  Bleaklow  area.  This  loss  is  nonetheless  significant 


38  The  Status  of  Moorland  Breeding  Birds  in  the  Peak  District  National  Park  2004 

because  Dunlins  were  found  in  only  33  1 km2  in  2004  compared  to  54  1 km2  in  1990.  This 
species  is  found  exclusively  on  blanket  bog,  preferably  with  pool  complexes.  A total  of  91 
pairs  of  Dunlins  were  recorded  during  the  survey  in  1990  compared  to  67  in  the  same  area 
in  2004.  The  data  suggest  that  there  has  been  a reduction  of  25%  in  the  breeding  population 
of  the  Dunlin  in  the  study  area  over  the  period.  The  average  density  throughout  the  study 
area  was  2.27  pairs/km2  and  the  highest  density  was  4.2  pairs/km2  in  prime  habitat  on 
Howden  Edge. 

European  Golden  Plovers  were  common  throughout  the  study  area  in  areas  above 
400m  and  where  the  vegetation  is  dominated  by  Eriophorum  vaginatum.  Birds  were  also 
found  nesting  on  areas  of  recently  burnt  heather  moorland.  Their  distribution  has  changed 
little:  a total  of  419  pairs  was  recorded  in  2004  compared  to  436  in  1990.  The  data  suggest 
that  the  population  has  remained  stable;  however  there  is  clearly  a paucity  of  records  in  the 
east  of  the  Dark  Peak  where  Heather  dominates;  therefore,  the  species  has  a distinct 
westerly  bias.  The  average  density  of  this  species  in  the  study  area  was  1.90  pairs/km2. 

The  Brown  and  Shepherd  (1991)  methodology  used  for  this  survey  is  clearly 
inadequate  for  censusing  Common  Snipe  Gallinago  gallinago.  Nevertheless,  the  same 
methodology  was  used  in  1990  and  2004  therefore  one  can  still  determine  the  trend  for  this 
species  in  the  Peak  District  National  Park;  135  territorial  males  were  recorded  in  the  survey 
area  in  2004  compared  to  56  in  1990.  The  birds  recorded  may  well  be  a fraction  of  the  true 
population  and  this  species  is  perhaps  the  most  common  breeding  wader  in  the  Peak 
District  National  Park. 

The  Curlews  range  and  population  in  the  Peak  District  appears  to  have  enjoyed  a 
significant  increase  since  1990;  259  pairs  were  recorded  in  the  study  area  in  1990 
compared  to  453  pairs  in  2004.  Furthermore,  birds  were  found  in  288  km2  in  2004 
compared  to  189  km2  in  1990.  There  appears  to  be  no  obvious  preference  of  nesting  habitat 
and  the  species  is  evenly  distributed  throughout  the  study  area,  the  only  requirement  of 
habitat  is  its  proximity  to  inbye  land  where  this  species  does  much  of  its  foraging. 
Consequently,  Eurasian  Curlews  are  largely  absent  from  the  central  massifs  of  the  Kinder 
and  Bleaklow  areas.  The  average  density  of  Curlews  in  2004  was  1 .54  pairs/km2. 

An  increase  in  population  and  distribution  is  also  evident  for  Short-eared  Owl  Asio 
flammeus  and  Raven  Corvus  corax , Indeed,  Ravens  have  undergone  a successful 
colonisation  of  the  district  since  1990  when  Brown  and  Shepherd  (1991)  stated  that  ‘there 
seems  little  immediate  prospect  of  the  return  of  this  species’.  This  emphasises  how  the 
fortunes  of  some  species  can  change  dramatically  in  only  a very  short  time  and  how  little 
we  know  about  the  changing  numbers  and  distribution  of  birds.  There  has  been  a gradual 
increase  in  the  population  of  Ravens  since  the  first  confirmed  breeding  in  1992  and  the 
estimated  breeding  population  in  2004  is  in  the  region  of  65  pairs,  however,  only  18  pairs 
were  confirmed  as  breeding.  Short-eared  Owls  have  also  increased  significantly  from  18 
pairs  in  1990  to  27  pairs  in  2004.  This  species  is  well  known  for  considerable  fluctuations 
of  breeding  pairs  that  can  occur  from  one  year  to  the  next  depending  on  the  vole  ( Microtus 
agrestis ) population. 

The  smaller  passerines  do  not  all  share  the  upward  trend  in  numbers  of  the  species 
already  described.  Indeed,  some  have  suffered  serious  declines  in  numbers  and  distribution. 
However,  this  cannot  be  said  for  both  Whinchat  and  Common  Stonechat.  The  former  has 
increased  by  more  than  60%  from  59  pairs  in  1990  to  97  pairs  in  2004.  This  species 
favours  the  bracken  covered  lower  slopes  of  the  moorland  fringe  where  they  can  be  easily 
detected  by  there  loud  characteristic  song  that  is  delivered  from  a prominent  perch.  One 
reason  for  this  rise  may  be  an  increase  in  suitable  habitat  resulting  from  the  spread  of 
bracken  since  1990.  Even  more  pronounced  is  the  increase  of  the  Common  Stonechat. 
Interestingly,  no  breeding  Stonechats  were  found  in  the  Peak  District  in  1990,  but  since  that 
time  colonisation  has  been  dramatic  and  91  pairs  were  recorded  in  2004.  Stonechats  were 
often  found  at  higher  altitudes  than  Whinchats  but  unlike  the  latter,  there  appears  to  be  no 
obvious  preference  of  vegetation  type  for  nesting.  Northern  Wheatear  is  also  a species  that 
inhabit  all  of  the  upland  area,  but  in  the  Peak  District  is  often  associated  with  rocky  areas 


39 


The  Status  of  Moorland  Breeding  Birds  in  the  Peak  District  National  Park  2004 

of  moorland.  The  numbers  of  territorial  Wheatears  recorded  in  2004  was  more  than  half  the 
number  recorded  in  1990,  only  45  pairs  compared  to  109  in  1990.  This  species  is  not 
considered  to  be  of  conservation  concern,  nevertheless,  Sim  et  al.  (2005)  also  found  a 
similar  significant  decrease  in  the  South  Pennines  between  1990  and  2000. 

In  contrast,  Ring  Ouzel  is  a Red  Listed  species  of  high  conservation  concern  due  to  its 
serious  breeding  population  and  range  decline  over  the  last  25  years.  Interestingly  however, 
no  significant  decline  was  witnessed  in  the  Peak  District  between  1990  and  2004  (98  and 
83  pairs  respectively).  Although  a slight  decline  of  15%  was  proven  from  the  data 
collected,  it  is  assumed  that  this  species  also  occurred  in  reasonable  numbers  in  the  doughs 
of  the  private  grouse  moors  where  access  was  denied.  The  distribution  of  this  species  has 
however  changed  a little  and  in  1990  it  was  notably  absent  from  the  eastern  moors,  but  this 
was  not  the  case  in  2004.  This  is  perhaps  not  significant  as  the  birds  will  take  up  territories 
wherever  the  opportunity  arises  as  they  do  not  appear  to  be  site  faithful.  This  was  probably 
proven  during  the  foot  and  mouth  outbreak  in  2002  when  many  pairs  bred  on  Stanage  Edge 
when  access  was  denied  to  climbers.  This  species  is  especially  vulnerable  to  disturbance; 
therefore  they  do  not  usually  nest  in  areas  frequented  by  recreational  users. 

Of  all  the  species  recorded  during  the  survey  the  biggest  and  most  alarming  change 
was  of  Twite.  This  is  a Red  Data  Book  species  (Batten  et  al.,  1990)  and  a Red  Listed 
Species  of  conservation  concern  due  to  an  historical  decline  in  the  UK:  a total  of  136  pairs 
of  Twites  were  found  in  the  study  area  during  the  survey  in  1990,  compared  to  only  ten 
pairs  in  the  same  area  in  2004.  The  species  was  found  at  three  localities  within  the  study 
area:  Wessenden  and  Melthem  moors  west  of  Huddersfield,  Edale  in  the  extreme  south  of 
the  Dark  Peak  and  the  Combs  Moss  area  in  Staffordshire.  Twites  are  thought  to  breed  in 
loose  colonies  therefore  it  is  unlikely  that  these  small  numbers  reflect  the  true  breeding 
population,  nevertheless,  the  decline  in  the  breeding  population  has  been  catastrophic. 
Anecdotal  evidence  does  however  exist  of  a slightly  larger  population  in  Staffordshire  than 
the  data  suggest.  Furthermore,  small  populations  were  known  at  two  other  localities  in  the 
northeast  of  the  study  area  in  2004,  Winscar  west  of  Barnsley  and  Black  Hill  near 
Holmfirth  (pers.  obs.).  The  decline  of  the  British  breeding  population  has  been  attributed  to 
the  deterioration  in  quality  and  quantity  of  the  inbye  land,  in  particular  the  seed  rich  hay 
meadows  in  which  the  species  feeds  in  summer  (Brown  et  al.,  1997).  However,  the 
explanation  is  perhaps  more  complex:  indeed,  a small  study  by  English  Nature  conducted 
in  2003  revealed  that  the  species  preferred  to  feed  in  semi-improved  pasture  with  a higher 
nutrient  level  resulting  in  an  abundance  of  Common  Sorrel  Rumex  acetosa  (Middleton, 
2003).  The  fact  remains  that  this  species  has  vanished  from  areas  that  appear  to  provide 
prime  habitat  {pers.  obs.).  This  species  has  a strong  preference  for  nesting  in  bracken; 
indeed,  there  are  many  bracken-covered  areas  of  moorland  adjacent  to  seed  rich  hay 
meadows  in  the  study  area  that  no  longer  support  breeding  Twites  which  were  found  in 
only  seven  1 km2  during  the  2004  survey,  compared  to  88  in  1990.  The  species  is,  however, 
known  to  breed  in  a few  other  localities  within  the  study  area.  Nevertheless,  Twites  have 
vanished  from  former  haunts  and  their  range  contraction  is  dramatic.  In  1990  the  species 
bred  in  14  tetrads  in  the  Sheffield  area  and  ten  years  previously  they  nested  in  26  tetrads. 
The  decline  has  continued  and  they  are  literally  ‘hanging  on’  in  a few  localities  in  the  south 
of  the  study  area. 

Brown  and  Shepherd  (1991)  stated  that  the  Twite  was  thinly  distributed  throughout  the 
study  area  following  the  survey  in  1990;  furthermore,  although  they  had  declined  in  the 
Sheffield  area  there  was  no  evidence  to  suggest  any  marked  change  in  its  distribution  in  the 
study  area.  The  birds  were  said  to  be  more  thinly  distributed  south  of  the  line  between 
Stalybridge  and  Holmfirth  and  it  is  therefore  interesting  to  note  that  south  of  this  line  is 
where  they  have  declined  most  in  the  intervening  time.  If  the  birds  are  indeed  loose  colony 
nesters,  could  it  be  possible  that  sites  are  abandoned  once  the  minimum  critical  level  is 
reached?  There  is  perhaps  little  evidence  to  support  this  hypothesis  at  present,  but  recent 
ringing  studies  in  the  South  Pennines  may  provide  more  information.  Following  the  survey 
in  1990,  Brown  and  Shepherd  (1991)  estimated  the  total  South  Pennines’  population  at 


40  The  Status  of  Moorland  Breeding  Birds  in  the  Peak  District  National  Park  2004 

around  415  pairs.  This  was  perhaps  however  an  underestimation  of  the  true  breeding 
population  at  that  time.  Interestingly,  the  population  at  present  is  estimated  between  200 
and  500  pairs  (RSPB  2001),  so  if  Brown  and  Shepherd  (1991)  were  accurate  in  their 
estimation,  perhaps  the  species  has  not  suffered  a population  decline  but  perhaps  a 
pronounced  range  contraction.  English  Nature  conducted  a small  study  in  2003  that 
revealed  that  it  was  indeed  abundant  in  certain  parts  of  the  Pennines  and  that  there  was  a 
‘hot  spot’  for  this  species  in  the  circle  of  moorland  between  Marsden,  Halifax,  Todmorden 
and  Rochdale  (Middleton,  2003).  Radiating  away  from  this  area  the  birds  become  more 
thinly  distributed.  Considering  that  Brown  and  Shepherd  (1991)  stated  that  the  birds  were 
thinly  distributed  throughout  the  study  area,  it  is  worth  considering  that  perhaps  the  Twites’ 
overall  population  in  the  South  Pennines  may  have  remained  stable,  and  it  is  just  their 
distribution  that  has  changed.  Indeed,  they  have  vanished  from  areas  that  provide  prime 
habitat;  therefore  their  foraging  requirements  are  perhaps  not  the  main  reason  for  the 
decline.  A study  by  Batty  et  al.  (1999)  provided  evidence  of  considerable  distribution 
change  since  the  1990  Brown  and  Shepherd  survey.  Whilst  Twites  were  found  in  only  20% 
of  the  squares  in  which  they  were  recorded  in  1990,  they  were  found  in  18%  of  the  sample 
of  squares  where  they  were  not  recorded  in  1990.  This  might  suggest  that  the  species  has 
undergone  some  redistribution.  Most  important,  however,  is  the  finding  that  the  increase  in 
densities  in  occupied  squares  has  increased  from  2.91  to  5.75.  This  again,  is  evidence  that 
may  suggest  the  species  has  undergone  a range  contraction  rather  than  a decline  in 
population. 

Summary 

Providing  evidence  of  increases  in  the  distribution  and  numbers  of  many  moorland 
breeding  birds  in  the  Peak  District  National  Park  is  a pleasing  outcome  from  the  survey  that 
is  in  direct  contrast  to  the  decline  of  many  lowland  farmland  birds  in  the  UK.  Indeed,  many 
of  the  birds  in  the  study  area  have  remained  stable  or  increased,  and  of  the  27  species  that 
were  recorded  during  both  the  surveys  of  1990  and  2004,  only  eleven  species  have  suffered 
a decline  and  only  nine  of  those  have  undergone  a significant  decrease  (see  Table  1). 

There  is  perhaps  little  doubt  that  densities  of  Red  Grouse  of  the  race  scoticus, 
indigenous  to  the  British  Isles,  are  found  nowhere  in  such  abundance  as  on  the  eastern  area 
of  the  Dark  Peak.  However,  although  this  species  appears  to  have  doubled  over  the  last  14 
years,  the  figures  mean  little  when  the  species  is  managed  and  kept  in  such  artificially  high 
numbers;  for  example,  2005  was  a bad  year  for  this  species  and  the  numbers  were 
subsequently  much  reduced. 

What  is  however,  of  great  consequence  is  that  many  species  of  national  importance 
have  remained  in  high  densities,  such  as  European  Golden  Plover.  This  species  is  at  the 
southern  extremity  of  its  range  and  its  population  has  remained  stable,  therefore  there  is 
perhaps  little  evidence  to  suggest  any  affects  from  global  warming.  Other  species  have 
increased  in  range  and  numbers  such  as  Peregrine  Falcon,  Merlin  and  Short-eared  Owl. 
Furthermore,  Raven  has  colonised  the  area  since  1990  and  Hen  Harrier  is  perhaps 
attempting  to  re-colonise.  Waders  have  also  fared  reasonably  well;  Dunlins  are  slightly 
down  in  both  range  and  numbers  resulting  from  loss  of  suitable  habitat  in  the  Bleaklow 
area,  but  Eurasian  Curlew,  Northern  Lapwing  and  Common  Snipe  have  all  increased  in 
numbers. 

There  is  no  real  evidence  to  suggest  that  the  status  of  Ring  Ouzel  has  changed  since 
1990,  whilst  Whinchat,  Common  Stonechat,  Reed  Bunting  and  Dipper  have  all  increased  in 
both  range  and  numbers.  There  is  perhaps  little  change  for  Sky  Lark  and  Meadow  Pipit, 
especially  as  these  species  were  not  recorded  in  the  same  detail  as  other  species. 

The  declines  of  some  species  are  perhaps  less  evident  but  nonetheless  significant. 
Common  Cuckoo  Cuculus  canorus  has  undergone  a massive  69%  reduction  in  numbers  in 
14  years  that  is  greater  than  the  national  trend  (Glue,  2006).  Northern  Wheatears  were  also 
much  reduced  in  2004,  but  most  notable  was  the  catastrophic  reduction  in  both  range  and 
numbers  of  Twite . 


The  Status  of  Moorland  Breeding  Birds  in  the  Peak  District  National  Park  2004  41 

Table  1 . 2004  Peak  District  Moorland  Breeding  Bird  Survey 


Species 

Breeding  Pairs 

Occupied  km2 

Percentage 

Change 

1990a 

2004a 

1990a 

2004a 

Abundance 

Occupancy 

Common  Buzzard*5 

1 18(2) 

1 

18 

1700% 

1700% 

Greater  Canada  Goose 

3 

57 

4 

37 

1800% 

825% 

Carrion  Crow 

117 

11 

67 

11 

-91% 

-84% 

Common  Sandpiperd 

14 

28 

10 

20 

100% 

100% 

Common  Cuckoo 

49 

15 

48 

14 

-69% 

-71% 

Eurasian  Curlew 

259 

453 

189 

288 

-75% 

-52% 

Dipper 

12 

21 

12 

20 

75% 

67% 

Dunlin 

91 

67 

54 

33 

-26% 

-39% 

European  Golden  Plover 

436 

419 

225 

218 

-4% 

-3% 

Grey  Wagtail 

26 

46 

24 

41 

24% 

41% 

Common  Kestrel*5 

68 

84(5) 

68 

77 

24% 

13% 

Northern  Lapwing 

61 

131 

44 

65 

115% 

48% 

Meadow  Pipitc 

10410 

8432 

476 

472 

-19% 

-1% 

Merlin*5 

21(9) 

31(6) 

21 

30 

48(50)% 

43% 

Peregrine  Falcon*5 

7(3) 

25(5) 

7 

25 

286(40)% 

257% 

Red  Grousec 

2337 

5416 

324 

422 

132% 

30% 

Common  Redshank 

9 

6 

8 

4 

-33% 

-50% 

Reed  Bunting 

16 

143 

13 

91 

794% 

600% 

Ring  Ouzel 

98 

83 

69 

65 

-15% 

-6% 

Short-eared  Owl*5 

18(5) 

27(18) 

18 

27 

50(260)% 

50% 

Sky  Larkc 

1153 

1069 

311 

306 

-7% 

-2% 

Common  Snipe 

56 

135 

42 

82 

141% 

95% 

Common  Stonechat6 

83 

64 

Twite 

131 

10 

88 

7 

-92% 

-92% 

Northern  Wheatear 

109 

45 

65 

37 

-59% 

-43% 

Whinchat 

59 

97 

37 

64 

64% 

73% 

a data  for  only  those  489  km2  surveyed  in  both  periods 
b raptor  sightings  (in  brackets  confirmed  breeding  pairs) 
c number  of  individuals,  not  pairs  (1990  counts  in  broad  classes,  2004  actual) 
d indication  of  change  not  reliable,  as  species  associated  with  reservoirs  not  included  in 
surveys 

e no  records  of  Common  Stonechat  during  1990  survey 


42  The  Status  of  Moorland  Breeding  Birds  in  the  Peak  District  National  Park  2004 

Perhaps  some  of  the  declines  were  predictable,  especially  in  the  case  of  Dunlin, 
because  large  areas  of  blanket  bog  in  the  Bleaklow  area  have  deteriorated  to  such  an  extent 
that  they  have  become  devoid  of  vegetation  and  are  eroding.  The  purpose  of  the  Moors  for 
the  Future  Project  is  to  preserve  and  enhance  the  moors  for  wildlife  but  also  for  future 
generations  to  enjoy,  therefore  work  in  the  Bleaklow  area  to  restore  and  revegetate  the 
badly  eroding  moors  has  begun  and  already  there  are  signs  of  success.  Furthermore,  paved, 
formally  eroded  footpaths  have  surprisingly  had  the  positive  effect  of  increasing  numbers 
of  breeding  waders  in  these  areas  and  both  Dunlins  and  European  Golden  Plovers  were 
found  nesting  extremely  close  to  the  Pennine  Way.  Indeed,  some  of  the  work  to  be 
addressed  by  the  MFF  project  will  be  to  repair  such  badly  eroded  rights  of  way.  Therefore, 
if  the  long  term  aim  of  the  ‘Moors  for  the  Future’  project  is  achieved  then  perhaps  we  can 
look  forward  to  further  increases  in  the  range  and  numbers  of  some  of  our  nationally 
important  species  in  the  Peak  District  National  Park. 

Acknowledgements 

The  authors  would  like  to  thank  the  land  owners  who  gave  access  to  their  land,  the 
surveyors,  English  Nature,  RSPB  and  the  ‘Moors  for  the  Future’  team. 

References 

Anderson,  P.  and  Yalden,  D.W.  (1981)  Increased  sheep  numbers  and  the  loss  of  heather 
moorland  in  the  Peak  District,  England.  Biological  Conservation  20:  195-213. 

Batty,  R.,  Langston,  R.H.W.  and  Gregory,  R.D.  (1999)  South  Pennines  Twite  survey  1999. 
RSPB,  Sandy. 

Brown,  A.F.  and  Shepherd,  K.  (1991)  Breeding  birds  of  the  South  Pennine  Moors.  JNCC, 
Peterborough. 

Frost,  R.A.  (1978)  Birds  of  Derby  shire . Moorland,  Buxton. 

Glue,  D.  (2006)  Cuckoos  in  crisis?  BTO  News  263:  22-23. 

Middleton,  P.  (2003)  Survey  of  moorland  fringe  wading  birds  and  Twite  around  the  South 
Pennine  moors  SSSI/SPA/cSAC.  Unpublished  report  to  English  Nature 
Ratcliffe,  D.A.  (1997)  A Nature  Conservation  Review.  Cambridge  University  Press, 
Cambridge. 

RSPB  (2001)  Twite  inventory,  Peak  District  to  M62.  RSPB,  Denby  Dale. 

Sim,  I.M.,  Gregory,  R.D.,  Hancock,  M.H.  and  Brown,  A.F.  (2005)  Recent  changes  in  the 
abundance  of  British  upland  breeding  birds.  Bird  Study  52:  261-275. 

BOOK  REVIEWS 

Grasses  of  the  British  Isles  by  T.A.  Cope  & AJ.  Gray.  Pp.  612,  with  numerous  line 
drawings.  Botanical  Society  of  the  British  Isles.  2009.  £19.99  (plus  p.  & p),  paperback  with 
plastic  cover,  available  from  Summerfield  Books,  3 Phoenix  Park,  Skelton,  Penrith, 
Cumbria  CA 11  9SD. 

This  is  the  latest  (No  13)  and  largest  (in  terms  of  content)  of  any  of  the  BSBI  handbooks, 
and  has  been  eagerly  awaited  for  some  time.  The  previous  definitive  and  authoritative  text, 
Hubbard’s  Grasses,  upon  which  many  of  us  relied  for  the  last  fifty  years  or  so,  has  been 
somewhat  overtaken  by  advances  in  grass  taxonomy  and  the  need  to  develop  more 
workable  and  user-friendly  keys  to  identification.  The  present  volume  can  be  best  summed 
up  in  two  words  - detailed  and  comprehensive  - since  it  contains  descriptions  of  220  native 
and  introduced  grass  species  including  subspecies,  hybrids  and  varieties,  together  with  line 
drawings  of  each  species.  It  also  contains  detailed  sections  on  the  morphology, 
reproduction  and  fruiting  characteristics  of  the  grass  plant;  classification  from  the 
subfamily  level,  with  very  explicit  keys  for  tribes,  genera  and  species;  and  a very  useful 
section  on  how  to  use  the  book  and  interpret  the  species  descriptions.  There  is  a 
comprehensive  glossary  of  terms,  bibliography  and  index  at  the  end  of  the  book. 


Book  reviews 


43 


The  major  part  of  the  book  deals  with  220  species,  covering  the  newly  coined  native 
and  casual  categories  as  identified  in  New  Atlas  of  the  British  & Irish  Flora  (2002).  Within 
each  species,  the  textual  content  follows  a clear  and  well-defined  sequence,  usually  in  five 
paragraphs.  Paragraph  one  gives  a formal  description  of  the  structural  and  physical  features 
necessary  to  identify  the  species;  paragraph  two  deals  with  the  plant’s  distribution  and 
habitat;  paragraph  three  is  concerned  with  its  biology  and  ecology,  discussing  annual, 
biennial  and  perennial  status,  reproductive  and  dispersal  strategies;  paragraph  four  looks  at 
its  status,  i.e.  native  or  introduced  in  the  British  Isles,  and  its  wider  distributional  (i.e. 
European)  context,  and  the  IUCN  categories  of  conservation  importance,  as  outlined  in  The 
Vascular  Plant  Red  Data  List  for  Great  Britain  (2005),  i.e.  Critically  Endangered, 
Endangered,  Vulnerable  and  Near  Threatened,  are  given  for  those  species,  such  as 
Calamagrostis  scotica , which  are  included  on  the  Red  Data  list.  The  page  reference  is  also 
given  where  the  species  can  be  found  in  New  Atlas  of  the  British  & Irish  Flora  (or  in  its 
accompanying  CD).  The  species  accounts  are  accompanied  by  superbly  executed  pen  and 
ink  line  drawings  of  all  parts  of  the  plant  requisite  for  accurate  identification.  These 
illustrations,  by  Margaret  Tebbs,  who  is  internationally  acclaimed  as  a botanical  artist,  are 
among  the  best  I have  ever  seen  of  any  plant  material. 

The  very  comprehensive  section  on  Keys  (pp.  34-103),  may  appear,  at  first  glance, 
somewhat  daunting  to  the  average  botanist.  The  introduction  of  keys  on  Tribes  will  be 
unfamiliar  to  many  of  us  in  Great  Britain,  and  has  been  developed  from  Tom  Cope’s 
familiarity  with  writing  Tropical  Grass  Floras,  where  Tribes  and,  indeed,  Genera,  are  just  as 
important  as  species.  Do  not  be  put  off,  however,  by  the  amount  of  detail  and  the 
sometimes  difficult  terminology  employed  in  the  keys.  I did  a trial  run,  employing  the 
keys,  on  one  or  two  specimens  of  well  known  grasses  in  my  herbarium,  and  I have  to  say 
that  they  seem,  with  practice,  to  work  quite  well.  As  with  anything  else,  one  needs  practice 
to  assimilate  and  become  familiar  with  new  techniques,  and  I think  this  new  system  of  keys 
will,  in  time,  largely  remove  the  risk  of  going  off  up  ‘blind  alleys’  that  we  have  all  done 
when  using  various  grass  keys  in  the  past.  To  supplement  the  section  on  Keys,  there  is  also 
a short  discussion  on  Classification,  in  which  the  characteristics  of  the  six  sub-families 
making  up  all  grass  genera  are  highlighted.  The  last  part  of  the  comprehensive  introductory 
part  of  the  book  deals  with  structure  and  reproduction,  covering  the  following  features: 
root,  stem  and  leaf;  inflorescence;  spikelet;  reproduction  and  breeding  behaviour;  vivipary 
and  proliferation;  fruit;  and  anatomy  and  metabolism.  Some  of  the  terminology  within  this 
section  is  somewhat  esoteric,  but,  by  and  large,  the  average  reader  can  gloss  over  these 
areas,  with  little  detriment. 

This  is  an  eminently  useable  book,  of  a convenient  size  to  be  carried  in  the  field  and 
with  a plastic  cover  to  minimise  wear  and  tear.  It  is  a very  worthy  successor  to  Hubbard’s 
Grasses , and  the  authors  are  to  be  congratulated  in  producing  what  is  now  and  will 
continue  to  be  the  standard  identification  text  for  grasses  in  the  British  Isles  for  many  years 
to  come.  I recommend  it  to  amateurs  and  professionals  alike  who  have  an  interest  in  or 
involvement  with  the  study  of  grasses  or  grassland  ecology. 

GTDW 

The  Scramble  for  the  Arctic  by  Richard  Sale  and  Eugene  Potapov.  Pp.223,  inch  b/w 
illustrations,  plus  20  colour  plates.  Frances  Lincoln,  London.  2010.  £16.99  hardback. 

This  is  a readable,  fascinating,  yet  sobering  book  which  takes  a global  perspective.  Each 
chapter  recounts  how  the  different  countries  possessing  arctic  regions  have  dealt  with 
particular  issues.  The  book  begins  with  an  historical  account  of  how  humans  moved  into 
and  settled  in  the  Arctic.  It  ends  with  an  account  of  the  first  contacts  between  the  aboriginal 
peoples  and  the  explorers  sent  out  by  countries  to  the  south.  The  following  chapter 
documents  how  these  countries  took  ownership  of  arctic  lands  and  how  the  indigenous 
people  suffered.  If  you  wondered  how  the  USA  rather  than  Britain  came  to  purchase  Alaska 
and  why,  you  will  find  interesting  insights  here  into  politics  and  power  struggles.  The 


44 


Book  reviews 


attempts  to  reach  the  North  Pole  and  navigate  the  Northwest  Passage  are  described.  The 
gradual  regaining,  by  indigenous  people,  of  some  autonomy  is  compared  between  the 
various  countries  with  arctic  lands.  The  key  treaties  which  led  to  current  ownership  of 
particular  arctic  island  and  land  masses  are  mentioned. 

The  central  chapters  in  the  book  deal  with  exploitation.  The  first  phase  was  for  furs  and 
one  is  astounded  by  the  enormous  number  of  animals  that  were  sacrificed.  It  was  only  after 
Prince  Albert  popularized  the  wearing  of  silk  top  hats  that  the  demand  for  beaver  pelts  to 
make  hats  dropped.  The  development  of  central  heating  and  the  economic  crash  of  the 
1930s  further  reduced  the  demand  for  furs  in  the  West.  The  Arctic  was  considered  of 
relatively  little  importance  after  the  Second  World  War  so  that  nuclear  bombs  were  tested 
there  by  both  the  Russians  and  the  Americans.  The  former  did  value  the  extraction  of  coal 
in  the  Arctic  and  there  had  been  a gold-rush  in  Alaska  earlier;  both  are  mentioned.  A second 
wave  of  exploitation  starting  around  the  1960s  involved  mineral  extraction,  which 
expanded  in  all  the  arctic  countries  in  spite  of  the  problems  of  dealing  with  the  climate, 
waste  and  local  inhabitants.  Finally  it  was  realized  what  a rich  resources  of  oil  and  gas  lay 
in  the  Arctic.  Countries  rushed  to  exploit  these  huge  reserves  which  are  documented  in  the 
book.  Conservation  issues  and  protests  by  aboriginal  people  are  described.  There  is  a 
chapter  on  international  law  in  the  Arctic  which  describes  how  countries  hammered  out 
agreements  on  environmental  protection  for  the  Arctic,  the  law  of  the  sea,  and  the 
Northwest  and  Northeast  Passages. 

The  final  chapter  deals  with  the  future  and  it  is  clear  that  the  Arctic  is  one  of  the  most 
fragile  ecosystems  in  our  planet,  vulnerable  to  pollution,  a thinning  ozone  layer,  and  global 
warming.  The  potential  danger  of  the  release  of  frozen  gas  hydrates  and  methane  from 
permafrost  with  their  capacity  to  exacerbate  global  warming  needs  to  be  appreciated  more 
widely.  The  likely  rush  to  exploit  the  most  northerly  reserves  of  oil  and  gas  to  fuel  a world 
that  refuses  to  address  energy  conservation  is  likely  to  lead  to  another  ‘scramble  for  the 
Arctic  which  will  result  in  a new  and  far  more  dangerous  cold  war’.  This  book  is  illustrated 
by  20  colour  photographs  and  a few  black  and  white  illustrations.  It  is  packed  with 
fascinating  information  on  wildlife  and  is  highly  recommended  to  naturalists,  students  and 
teachers,  as  well  as  to  a wider  readership. 

DHSR 

The  Buildings  of  England.  Yorkshire  West  Riding  by  Peter  Leach  and  Nikolaus 
Pevsner.  Pp.  xx  + 824,  incl.  numerous  line  drawings,  plus  64  pages  of  full  colour  plates. 
2009.  Yale  University  Press,  New  Haven  & London.  £29.99  hardback. 

Naturalists  who  spend  a significant  amount  of  time  in  the  field  usually  appreciate  their 
cultural  as  well  as  their  natural  heritage,  often  working  in  a wide  range  of  habitats 
supporting  historically  and  architecturally  interesting  buildings.  For  those,  like  me,  whose 
special  interests  are  attracted  to  churchyards,  a copy  of  the  relevant  ‘Pevsner’  has  been  an 
essential  item  in  their  field  kit;  the  useful  detail  contained  therein,  particularly  geological 
and  chronological,  is  of  great  importance  to  environmental  interpretation.  A revision  of  the 
West  Yorkshire  volume  (essentially  vice-county  64),  the  last  edition  appearing  in  1967,  is 
long  overdue.  For  a more  balanced  view  of  our  heritage,  the  complementary  use  of  such 
texts  with  the  usual  armoury  of  field  guides  is  strongly  recommended.  Remarkable  value  - 
a mine  of  information  contained  in  a reasonably  handy  volume. 


MRDS 


Irish 

Naturalists’  Journal 

The  Irish  Naturalists’  Journal,  sucessor  to  the  Irish 
Naturalist,  commenced  publication  in  1925.  The  quarterly 
issues  publish  papers  on  all  aspects  of  Irish  natural  history, 
including  botany,  ecology,  geography,  geology  and  zoology. 
The  Journal  also  publishes  distribution  records,  principally 
for  cetaceans,  fish,  insects  and  plants,  together  with  short 
notes  and  book  reviews. 

Current  subscription  rates  for  four  issues  (including 
postage):  €33.00  (£20.00  stg);  Students  €11.00  (£7.00  stg). 
Further  details  from:  Mr  Brian  Nelson,  INJ,  Department  of 
Zoology,  Ulster  Museum,  Botanic  Gardens,  Belfast 
BT9  5AB. 


Titus  Wilson 

Kent  Works  • Bumeside  Road  • Kendal  • Cumbria  • LA9  4RL 
Tel.  01539  720244 

Specialist  printers /binders  of 
Academic  Journals,  Catalogues  and  Private  Publications 

Our  service  includes  attending  to  worldwide  distribution 


Binding 

Why  not  have  your  copies  of  The  Naturalist  bound  into 
volumes?  One  year’s  issues  per  volume,  or  alternatively  two 
years  in  one  volume  at  less  cost  than  binding  as  two  separate 
volumes.  We  are  also  experienced  in  binding  theses  and 
experts  in  the  re-binding  and  repairing  of  all  books. 

Spink  & Thackray 
Broomfield  Binder 

Back  Broomfield  Crescent  Telephone:  0113  2780353 

LEEDS  LS6  3BP  Fax  0 1 1 3 2304 1 55 

www  .spinkandthackray  .co  .uk 


Printed  in  Great  Britain  by  Titus  Wilson  & Son,  Kendal 


ISSN  0028-0771 


SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  LIBRARIES 


3 9088  01535  1356 

ALIEN  PLANTS  OF  YORKSHIRE 

GEOFFREY  WILMORE 

The  first  comprehensive  modem  publication  dealing  with  the  alien 
plants  of  any  major  British  county,  detailing  the  flora  (almost  1300 
species)  of  Yorkshire’s  wool  waste  dumps,  railway  sidings,  sewage  works, 
shoddy  fields,  industrial  wasteland,  dockland  and  oil  mill  sidings. 

Pp.  316,  including  15  line  drawings;  published  2000 
Normal  price:  £11.00  (plus  £2.50  p.&p.) 

Reduced  price  for  members  of  the  YNU:  £9.00  (plus  £2.50  p.&p.) 

Please  make  cheques  payable  to  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union. 

Available  from:  Mr  John  A.  Newbold,  Stonecroft,  3 Brookmead 

Close,  Sutton  Poyntz,  Weymouth,  Dorset  DT3  6RS 


THE  FRESHWATER  CRUSTACEA  OF  YORKSHIRE 

a faunistic  & ecological  survey 

GEOFFREY  FRYER 

The  cmstacean  fauna  of  Yorkshire  reflects  the  great  physiographic  diversity  of 
the  region.  Adopting  an  ecological  approach,  this  book  considers  the  Yorkshire 
fauna  in  relation  to  climate,  topography,  geology,  soils  and  water  chemistry, 
always  keeping  in  mind  that  it  is  dealing  with  living  organisms  whose  habits, 
requirements  and  physiological  limitations  determine  exactly  where  they  live. 
Matters  covered  include  the  ecological  background;  faunal  assemblages  and  their 
regional  attributes;  an  analysis  of  the  factors  that  determine  distribution  patterns, 
many  of  which  are  mapped;  wide  geographical  aspects;  and  conservation.  Large 
areas,  such  as  the  Pennines,  Howgill  Fells,  North  Eastern  uplands  and  the  lowland 
plains  are  surveyed.  So  too  are  localised  regions  including  Whemside,  the  Malham 
area,  lowland  heaths,  and  the  largest  lakes,  as  well  as  habitats  such  as  upland  tarns, 
seepages,  cold  springs,  small  lowland  ponds,  inland  saline  waters.  Notes  are  given 
on  every  species  recorded,  including  parasitic  forms. 

Price  £5.00  (plus  £2.50  p.&p.)  Special  offer  to  members  of  the  Yorkshire 
Naturalists’  Union  £3.50  (plus  £2.50  p.&p.) 

Please  make  cheques  payable  to  Yorkshire  Naturalists’  Union. 

Available  from:  Professor  M.  R.  D.  Seaward,  Department  of  Geography 
and  Environmental  Science,  University  of  Bradford,  Bradford  BD7  1DP.