Skip to main content

Full text of "The Nautilus"

See other formats


HOI 


FHE  NAUTILUS 


Volume  104 
1990 


AUTHOR  INDEX 


Annis.  C  G  ,  Jr. 
Belancer,  T.  V. 

Bcx;an,  a.  E 

Cairns.  J ,  Jr.,     . . . 

Cherrv,  D.  S 

Coney.  C.  C 

doherty,  f.  g. 
Emberton.  K.  C. 
Emerson.  V\'.  K 
P'airbanks.  H.  L 

CilLMER,   R     \\ 

Harasewych.  M.  G. 
houbrick,  r.  s. 

Hl'NTER.  R    D.      ... 


.   4  Lodge.  DM 

4  Marshall,  B   ,\ 

29  McLean,  J.  li 

10  Neck,  R.  W 

10  Petuch,  E.  J 5' 

130  Pierce,  H.  G 

10  Richardson,  L 

■W  Robertson,  R  

108  Rosenberg,  G,  

71  Sage,  W    E.  Ill        1, 

1 1 1  Spamer,  E.  E 

120  Stahl,  T 

3.5  Toll,  R   B  

87  VanEpps,  D.  D 


92 

10,3 

I    i 

16 

,  96 
53 
33 

145 
29 

108 
29 
92 
26 

.  4 


NEW  TAXA  proposed  IN  VOLUME  104  (1990) 


MONOPLACOPHORA 

Micropilina  tangaroa  Marsli.ill,  new  .species    107 

GASTROPODA 

Cvathermiidae  McLean,  new  family  (Archeogastropoda)         78 

Stjmmetrophalus  McLean,  new  genus  ((\!yallierniiidae)  79 

Symmctrophalus  regitlaris  McLean,  new  Species  (Cyathermiidae)     79 

Turritella  tiiarianopsis  Petuch,  new  species  (Turitellidae)  59 

Cypraea  (Macrocypraea)  spengleri  Petuch,  new  Species  (Cypraeidae)     97 

Cypraea  (Pseiidozonaria)  porteUi  Petuch,  new  species  (Cypraeidae)        97 

Chicoreus  hilli  Petuch.  new  species  (Muricidae)  59 

Dermomurex  (TrialatcUa)  cuna  Petuch,  new  species  (Muricidae)    60 

Murt'X  ruhitlus  fxinuniicits  Petuch,  new  species  (Muricidae)  62 

Mtirexiella  eduardpauli  Petuch,  new  species  (Muricidae)      62 

Miccosukea  Petuch.  new  subgenus  (Melongenidae)  99 

Melongena  (Miccosukea)  cynthiac  Petuch.  new  species  (Melongenidae)         99 

Melongena  (Miccosukea)  holeylandica  Petuch,  new  species  (Melongenidae)    100 

Latirus  cuna  Petuch,  new  species  (Fasciolariidae)  62 

Latirus  deynzcrorum  Emerson  and  Sage,  new  species  (Fasciolariidae)     1 

Milra  (Sehularia)  leonardi  Petuch.  new  species  (Mitridae)  63 

Ohta  (Strepliona)  reticularis  erncsti  Petuch.  new  species  (Oiividae)        63 

Prunum  leonardhilli  Petuch.  new  species  (Margineiiidae)  63 

Falsilyria  ernensti  Petuch.  new  species  (V'oi\itidae)  64 

Sraphella  seminolc  Petuch.  new  species  (Volutidae)       100 

Voluta  lacertina  Petuch.  new  species  (Volutidae)     64 

Conux  brunneufilaris  Petuch,  new  species  (Conidae)    66 

Conus  capeletii  Petuch,  new  species  (Conidae) 100 

Conus  ernesli  Petuch,  new  species  (Conidae)  67 

Conus  granarius  panamicus  Petuch,  new  species  (Conidae)    67 

Conus  griffini  Petuch,  new  species  (Conidae)    103 

Conus  hilli  Petuch,  new  species  (Conidae)     67 

Conus  lemoni  Petuch,  new  species  (Conidae)  103 

Conm  roscmarijae  Petuch.  new  species  (C^onidae)    68 

Fusiturrictda  sunderlandi  Petuch,  new  species  (Turridae)     69 

Knejastia  hilli  Pclucli   tii\..  species  (Turridae)  70 

Procijmhulia  phillporum  Gilmer,  new  species  (Peraclididae)     112 

BIVALVIA 

Bellascinlillii  Coney   ii'"'   <p.'cies  (Galeommatidae)  137 

Bellascintilln  parmaUr,.    n  f miey.  new  species  (Galeommatidae)  138 


THE  NAUTILUS 


Volume  104,  Number  1 
June  25,  1990 
ISSN  0028-1344 

A  quarterly  devoted 
to  malacology. 


iAdU^^i  Biological  Laboralcr^ 
LIBRARY 

JUL      9  1990 


j      Woods  Hole,  Mass. 


EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 
Dr.  M  G.  Harasewych 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 

ASSOCIATE  EDITOR 
Dr.  R.  Tucker  Abbott 
American  Malacologists,  Inc. 
P.O.  Box  2255 
Melbourne,  FL  32902 

CONSULTING  EDITORS 
Dr.  Riidiger  Bieler 
Department  of  Malacology 
Delaware  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
P.O.  Box  3937 
Wilmington,  DE  19807 

Dr.  Robert  T.  Dillon,  Jr. 
Department  of  Biology 
College  of  Charleston 
Charleston,  SC  29424 

Dr.  William  K.  Emerson 

Department  of  Living  Invertebrates 

The  American  Museum  of  Natural 

History 

New  York,  NY  10024 

Mr.  Samuel  L.  H.  Fuller 
1053  Mapleton  Avenue 
Suffielcl,  CT  06078 

Dr.  Robert  Hershler 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 

Dr  Richard  S.  Houbrick 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington.  DC  20560 


Mr.  Richard  I.  Johnson 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Aurele  La  Rocque 
Department  of  Geology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  James  H.  McLean 
Department  of  Malacology 
Los  Angeles  County  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
900  Exposition  Boulevard 
Los  Angeles,  CA  90007 

Dr.  Arthur  S.  Merrill 
%  Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Ms.  Paula  M.  Mikkelsen 
Harbor  Branch  Oceanographic 
Institution,  Inc. 
Ft.  Pierce,  FL  33450 

Dr.  Donald  R.  Moore 

Division  of  Marine  Geology 

and  Geophysics 

Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  and 

Atmospheric  Science 

University  of  Miami 

4600  Rickenbacker  Causeway 

Miami,  FL  33149 

Mr.  Richard  E.  Petit 

P.O.  Box  30 

North  Myrtle  Beach,  SC  29582 

Dr.  Edward  J.  Petuch 
Department  of  Geology 
Florida  Atlantic  University 
Boca  Raton,  FL  33431 

Dr.  David  H.  Stansbery 
Museum  of  Zoology 
The  Ohio  State  Universit\ 
Columbus,  OH  43210 


Dr.  Ruth  D.  Turner 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  (Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Geerat  J.  Vermeij 
Department  of  Geology 
University  of  California  at  Davis 
Davis,  CA  95616 


SUBSCRIPTION  INFORMATION 

The  subscription  rate  per  vohmie 
is  US  $25.00  for  individuals,  US 
$35.00  for  institutions.  Postage 
outside  the  United  States  is  an 
additional  US  $4.00  for  surface 
and  US  $12.00  for  air  mail.  All 
orders  should  be  accompanied  by 
payment  and  sent  to:  THE 
NAUTILUS,  P.O.  Box  3430,  Silver 
Spring,  Ml)  20901. 

Change  of  address:    Please  inform 
the  publisher  of  your  new  address 
al  least  6  weeks  in  advance.  All 
conununications  should  include 
both  old  and  new  addresses  (with 
zip  codes)  and  state  the  effective 
date. 

THE  NAUTILUS  (ISSN  0028- 
1344)  is  published  quarterly  by 
Trophon  Corporation,  8911  Alton 
Parkway,  Silver  Spring,  MD  20910. 

Second  Cla.ss  postage  paid  at  Silver 
Spring,  MD  and  additional  mailing 
offices. 

POSTMASTER:  Send  address 
changes  to:  THE  NAUTILUS 
P.O.  Box  3430 
Silver  Spring,  MD  20901 


TH  Ef^NAUTI  LUS 


CONTENTS 


Volume  104,  Number  1 

June  25.  1990 

ISSN  0028-1344 


William  K.  Emerson 
Walter  E.  Sage,  III 


A  new  species  of  Latirua  from  the  Philippine  Islands 
(Gastropoda:  Fasciolariidae)      


T^t:: 


Thomas  V.  Belanger                           Growth  rates  of  the  Asiatic  Clam,  Corhicula  fluminea,  in  \ 

Clifford  G.  Annis,  Jr.                           the  Upper  and  Middle  St.  Johns  River,  Florida               J(JL  9    1990               ^ 

Delmar  D.  VanEpps  1 

'  ', 

Francis  G.  Doherty  Multiseasonal  tissue  growth  trends  in  Corhicula  fluminea 

Donald  S.  Cherry  (Bivalvia:  Corbiculidae)  from  the  New  River,  Virginia       10 

John  Cairns,  Jr. 

Raymond  W.  INeck  Geological  substrate  and  human  impact  as  influences  on 

bivalves  of  Lake  Lewisville,  Trinity  River,  Texas  16 

Ronald  B.  Toll  A  reaffirmation  of  the  nomenclatural  status  of  Octopus 

filosus  Howell,  1868,  the  senior  synonym  of  Octopus 
Inimmclincki  Adam,  1936  26 

Gary  Rosenberg  Coelatura  Conrad,  1853,  Caelatura  Conrad,  1865  and 

Arthur  E.  Bogan  Coelatura  Pfeiffer,  1877  (Mollusca):  a  tale  of  two 

Earle  E.  Spamer  diphthongs    29 

Kenneth  C.  Emberton  Eduardus  Pilsbry,  1930,  a  subgenus  of  Praticolella 

Leonard  Richardson  Martens,  1892  (Gastropoda:  Stylommatophora: 

Polygyridae)  33 

INews  and  Notices    34 


WESTERN  SOCIETY  OF  MALACOLOGISTS 

in  conjunction  with  the 

SANTA  BARBARA  SHELL  CLUB 

is  offering  a 

STUDENT  RESEARCH  GRANT  IN  MALACOLOGY 

As  part  of  their  commitment  to  the  continued  study  of  molkisks,  tlie  Western  Society  of  Malacologists  and  the  Santa 
Barbara  Shell  (^lub  are  pleased  to  announce  the  availability  of  grants  to  support  student  research  in  malacolog\ .  Funds 
are  available  for  actual  research  costs,  including  iiut  not  limited  to,  field  and  laboratory  equipment,  chemicals, 
photographic  supplies,  computer  time  and  supplies,  microscope  usage  fees,  and  reasonable  research  travel  costs. 

ELIGIBILITY 

Applicant  must  be  a  full  time  student  in  a  formal  graduate  or  undergraduate  degree  program. 

The  thesis,  di.ssertation  or  research  project  must  be  focused  primarily  on  the  systematics,  biology,  ecology  or 
paleontology  of  marine,  terrestrial  or  freshwater  mollusks.  Research  currently  in  progress  or  beginning  in  the  1990- 
91  academic  year  w  ill  be  considered. 

REQUIREMENTS 

Five  copies  of  the  following  ilocuments  are  required  for  each  application: 

1.   A  completed  application  form. 

2.  A  proposal,  limited  to  two  pages,  which  discusses  the  research  project  and  its  malacological  significance 
including  details  of  the  work  to  be  aided  by  this  grant. 

3.  A  budget  which  outlines  how  the  grant  funds  will  be  used. 

4.  A  resume  or  outline  of  the  applicant's  academic  background. 

5.  A  letter  of  recommendation  from  the  applicants  research  advisor. 

6.  A  list  of  grants  and  amounts  which  are  currently  being  received  or  have  been  applied  for  the  1990- 
91  academic  year. 

AWARD 

One  or  more  research  grants  up  to  $1,500  are  available. 

APPLICATION  DEADLINE 

Completed  applications  musi  be  received  no  later  than  .'J  I  July  1990.  .Awards  will  be  announced 
by  15  S(^ptember  1990.  Plea.se  send  applications  to: 

Malacology  Grant 

Department  of  Invertebrate  Zoology 

Santa  Barbara  Museum  of  Natural  History 

2559  Puesta  del  Sol  Road 

Santa  Barbara,  CA  93105 

For  further  information  or  applications  contact: 

Dr.  Vida  Kenk  (408)  924-4894,  or  Paul  Scott  (805)  682-4711 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(l):l-3.  1990 


Page  1 


A  New  Species  of  Latirus  from  the  Philippine 
Islands  (Gastropoda:  Fasciolariidae) 


William  K.  Emerson 
Waller  E.  Sage,  III 

Department  (if  Iinertebrates 
American  Museum  of  Natural  Histors 
Ne«  York,  NY  1002-1,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Latirus  deynzcrorum  new  species  is  descril^ed  from  specimens 
obtained  in  tangle  nets  set  off  Bogo,  NE  Cebu  Island,  Philippine 
Islands  and  elsew  here  in  the  central  Philippine  Archipelago. 


INTRODL'CTION 

During  the  past  ten  years  many  new  species  or  otherwise 
significant  specimens  of  marine  mollusks  have  Ijeen  col- 
lected by  fishermen  from  tangle  nets  set  in  moderateK' 
deep  water  in  the  channels  off  the  central  Philippine 
Islands,  mostK  in  the  region  of  Cebu  and  Bohol.  Speci- 
mens of  the  new  species  of  Latirus  described  herein  were 
obtained  several  years  ago  from  these  sources  by  Major 
Al  Deynzer  of  Showcase  Shells,  Sanibel,  Florida,  who 
recently  submitted  the  specimens  for  study.  We  take 
pleasure  in  describing  this  nev\'  ta.xon  in  honor  of  Bev 
and  Al  De>nzer,  \\  ho,  as  avid  students  of  mollusks,  have 
generously  shared  their  discoveries  with  us  and  others 
through  the  years. 

SYSTEMATIC  ACCOUNT 

Family  Fasciolariidae  Gray,  1847 
Subfamily  Peristerniinae  Tryon,  1880 
Genus  Latirus  Montfort,  1810 

Type  species:  by  monotypy,  Latirus  aurantiacus  Mont- 
fort, 1810  [=  L.  gihhulus  [QmeWn.  1791)],  Recent,  Indo- 
Pacific, 


Latirus  deijnzerorurn  new  species 

(figures  1-3) 

"Latirus  sp.    Springsteen,  1985:4, 


■,  fig.  4. 


Diagnosis:  A  mediimi-size  latirid,  ornamenteil  with 
prickled  varices.  Shell  somewhat  resembles  Latirus  mac- 
ulata  (Reeve,  1847;  Turbinclla  species  70,  pi.  13:70a, 
70b)  from  the  Indo-Pacific  (Springsteen  &  Leobrera,  1986: 
181,  pi.  48:22).  It  differs  from  Reeves  taxon  in  having  a 


larger,  more  angular  shell,  with  a  much  longer  and  more 
recurved  siphonal  canal  and  by  distinctive  sculptural 
characters  and  color  patterns,  Peristernia  cremnochione 
Melvill  (1891:397,  pi.  2:9),  a  smaller  species  attaining  24 
mm  in  length,  from  Mauritius,  more  closely  resembles 
this  new  taxon  in  the  outline  and  color  pattern  of  the 
shell.  Melvill's  taxon,  however,  lacks  a  siphonal  fascicle, 
and  has  a  short,  straight  siphonal  canal,  characteristic  of 
Peristernia. 

Description:  Shell  solid,  fusiformly  elongate,  attaining 
40-1-  iTim  in  length,  whorls  angularK  rounded,  axialh 
ribbed  and  crossed  by  conspicuous  spiral  lirae  forming 
small  prickle-like  profusions  medially  on  varices,  si- 
phonal canal  narrowly  elongated  and  recurved,  outer  lip 
thin,  edge  of  labrum  lirate. 

Protoconch  glossy,  smooth,  consisting  of  1  Vz  embryonic 
whorls;  postnuclear  whorls  6  to  6'/2  in  number,  with  8  to 
9  widely  spaced,  rounded  axial  ribs,  crossed  by  about  14 
strong  spiral  cords  on  the  body  whorl  posterior  to  the 
siphonal  canal.  Suture  partialK  obscuretl  b\  fluted  axial 
riblets.  Dorsal  surface  of  siphonal  canal  with  2  prominent 
spiral  ridges  and  numerous  lesser  intervening  lirae.  Ap- 
erture widely  ovate,  outer  lip  with  weak  lirations;  col- 
umella smooth,  with  inner  margin  raised  to  form  a  thin 
detached  edge  anteriorly,  extending  to  near  the  terminal 
end  of  the  narrow,  recurved  siphonal  canal;  siphonal 
fascicle  well-formed  and  strongly  corded.  For  measure- 
ments, see  table  1.  Radula  and  soft  parts  not  seen. 

Color:  Protoconch  light  tan;  base  color  of  shell  orange 
buff,  early  whorls  of  spire  grayish  brown,  subsequent 
whorls  with  broken  bands  of  brown  forming  prominent 
blotches  (figure  1);  some  specitnens  weakK  blotched  or 
entirely  lacking  blotches  (figures  2,  3);  fascicle  stained 
dark  brow  n  above  and  w  ithin  the  groove;  aperture  pink- 
ish white. 

Type  locality:  Off  Bogo,  NE  Cebu  Island  (11°03'N, 
124°E),  from  tangle  nets  set  in  moderateK  deep  water. 
May,  1981. 

Type  depository:  Holotype  AMNH  232138,  4  paratypes 
AMNH  232139;  2  paratypes  in  the  Deynzer  collection. 


Page  2 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol,  104,  No.  1 


Figures  1-3. 

X  1V4. 


Type  specimens  of  Latirus  deynzerorum  new  species.  1.  Holotype  AMNH  232138;  2,  3.  Paratypes  AMNH  232139; 


Range:  Known  from  the  type  locality  in  the  central 
Philippine  Islands;  also  off  Panglao  Island  (9°35'N, 
123°48'E),  October,  1985,  in  "deep  water,"  tangle  nets, 
AMNH  239585  (2  specimens,  ex-F.  J.  Springsteen  coll.); 
and  off  Punta  Engano,  Mactan  Island,  NE  Cebu,  in  tangle 
nets  (Springsteen,  1985:4). 

Remarks:  Our  knowledge  of  the  ta.xonomic  relation- 
ships of  the  multitude  of  latirid-like  species  that  are  re- 
ferable to  Peristerniinae  genus-group  taxa  has  not  pro- 
gressed much  since  the  appearance  of  the  early  reviews 
of  Kiener  (1840),  KiJster  and  Kobelt  (1844-1876),  Reeve 
(1847),  Tryon  (1880,  1881),  Cossmann  (1889)  and  Melvill 
(1891,  1911).  At  the  present  time  (see  Boss,  1982:1016, 
1017;  Vaught,  1989:50),  most  of  these  species  are  assigned 
to  either  the  genus  Latirus  scnsu  tato  (with  several  non- 
nominate  subgenera),  or  to  the  genus  Peristernia  Mcirch 
(1852:99),  type  species  (by  subsequent  designation:  Coss- 
mann 1889:166),  Turhinella  crenulata  Reeve  (1847,  pi. 


4,  fig.  24).  Based  on  shell  characters  alone,  however, 
generic  placement  of  these  species  is  largely  arbitrary, 
without  knowledge  of  the  radular  morphology.  For  ex- 
ample, the  type  of  Fu.solatinis  Kuroda  and  Habe  (1971: 
182),  Fusolatirus  pilsbryi  (Kuroda  and  Habe,  1971:183, 
pi.  50,  figs.  1,  2),  was  described  as  having  '".  .  .  the  shell 
of  Latiriis-form  and  the  radula  of  Peristernia-{onnu\a.." 
Therefore,  the  precise  generic  allocation  of  the  new 
species  described  herein  must  remain  provisional  until 
the  nature  of  the  radula  is  known. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

In  addition  to  Major  Deynzer,  we  thank  F.  J.  Springsteen 
for  contributing  comparative  material.  We  also  thank 
Andrew  S.  Modell  and  Stephanie  Crooms  of  the  Amer- 
ican Museum  of  Natural  History,  respectiveK ,  for  the 
photography  and  word-processing. 


Table  1.  Latirus  deynzerorum  new  species.  Shell  measure- 
ments of  specimens  in  mm  and  number  of  postiiuciear  whorls; 
widths  measured  including  varices,  n  =  9.  Specimens  deposited 
in  the  AMNH  collection  unless  otherwise  stated. 


No. 

Length 

Width 

whorls 

Holotype  (figure  1) 

39.6 

17.3 

6'/2 

Paratype  (figure  2) 

39.4 

16.4 

Wz 

Paral)pe  (figure  3) 

33.4 

15.3 

6 

Paratype  (Deynzer 

L'Oll.) 

34.2 

15.7 

6 

Paratype  (De\nzer 

L-Oll.) 

33.9 

15.0 

6 

Paratype 

31.0 

14.4 

6 

Paratype 

27.2 

12.8 

6 

Referred  specimens 

■>.5..5 

16.1 

6'/2 

(AMNH  2.39.58.51 

■■A  :} 

13.3 

6 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Boss.  K.  J.  1982.  Mollusca.  In:  Parker,  S.  P.  (ed.).  S>nopsis 
and  classification  of  living  organisms.  McGraw-Hill  Book 
Company,  New  York,  1:945-1166. 

Cossmann,  M.  1889.  Catalogue  illustre  des  coquilles  fossiles 
de  I  Eocene  des  environs  de  Paris.  .Annales  de  la  Societe 
Royale  Malacologiqvie  de  Belgique,  Memoires  24(4):3-381. 

Gtnelin,  J.  E.    1791.    Caroli  a  Linne  Systema  naturae  per  regna 

tria  naturae,  13th  ed.  Leipzig,  vol.  1,  pt.  6,  cl.  6,  \'ernies, 

p.  3021-3910 
Gray,  J.  E.     1847.     .\  list  of  the  genera  of  Recent  Mollusca, 

their  synonyma  and  tvpes.  Proceedings  Zoological  Society 

of  London.'for  1847:129-219. 
Kiener,  L.  C.    1840.    Genre  Turhinelle,  Species  general  et  icon- 

ographie  des  cotjuilles  \i\  antes.  .  .  ,  Paris,  5:1-50.  pis.  1- 

21. 


W.  K.  Emerson  and  W.  E.  Sage,  III,  1990 


Page  3 


Kuroda,  T.  and  T  HuIk-.  1971  Iii:  kuioda.  T.,  T.  llalw  and 
K.  Oyama  (eds. ).  The  sea  sliells  ot  Sagami  Bay,  collected 
by  HLs  Majest)'  The  Emperor  ol  Japan.  Marnzen  C^o,,  To- 
kyo, p.  i-xix,  1-741.  Tokyo,  p.  \vi  +  748  [Japanese  text]; 
121  pis.,  p.  1-489  [English  text],  p.  1-51  [index]. 

Kiister,  H  C.  and  \V.  Kobelt.  1844-1876.  Systematisches  Con- 
chylien-Cabinet  von  Martini  und  Chemnitz,  neu  heraus- 
gegeben  Turhinella  und  Fasciularia.  .  .  .  Nuremberg,  3(3a): 
1-164. 

Melvill,  J.  C;.  1891.  .An  historical  account  of  the  genus  Ldtinis 
(Monttort)  and  its  dependencies,  with  ilescriptions  of  elev- 
en new  species,  and  a  catalogue  ot  Latirus  and  FeristcnUa. 
Memoirs  and  Proceedings  of  the  Manchester  Literary  & 
Philosophical  Societ)',  series  4,  4(5):365-411. 

Melvill,  J.  C.  1911.  An  enumeration  of  the  additions  made  to 
the  genus  Latirus  Montfort,  since  1891,  with  descriptions 
of  three  new  species.  The  Journal  of  Conchologv  13(6): 
164-178. 


Moiitlnrt,  P.  D,  dc  1810.  t:onch\  liiilogic  s\slematique  et 
classilication  methodique  des  ciHiuilles,     .  .  Paris  2:1-676. 

Morch,  O.  A.  L.  1852.  C;atalogus  conchyliorum  quae  reliquit 
D  .Alphonso  D'Aguirra  et  (ladea  CJomes  de  Yoldi.  Typis 
Ludosici  Kleini,  Fasciculus  Primus,  C^openhagen,  [Gastro- 
poda, etc.],  170  p. 

Reeve,  L.  A.  1847.  Conchologia  Iconica:  illustrations  of  the 
shells  of  Molluscous  animals,  vol.  4.  Monograph  of  the 
genus  Turhinella,  text  &  13  pis. 

Springsteen,  V.  J.  1985.  Some  unusual  I'hilippine  shells,  pt. 
111.  Carfel  Philippine  Shell  News  7(4):3-7. 

Springsteen,  F.  J.  and  F.  M.  Leobrera.  1986.  Shells  of  the 
Philippines.  Carfel  .Seashell  Museum.  Manila,  377  p.,  illus. 

Trvon,  G.  V\'.,  Jr.  1880,  1881.  Family  Fusidae,  Manual  of 
Conchology,  series  1,  3(9):46-64,  [issued,  Jan.  2,  1880]; 
3(10):65-97  [issued.  Mar.  28,  1881]. 

Naught,  K.  C.  1989.  A  classification  of  the  living  Mollusca. 
American  Malacologists,  Melbourne.  FL.  \ii  +  195  pp. 


THF  NAUTILUS  104(l):4-9,  1990 


Page  4 


Growth  Rates  of  the  Asiatic  Clam,  Corhicula  fluminea,  in  the 
Upper  and  Middle  St.  Johns  River,  Florida 


Thomas  V.  Bclanger 
Clifford  G.  Aniiis,  Jr. 
Delmar  D.  VanEpps 

Departnieiit  of  (^licinical  and 
Em  iroiiinental  Knginecriiig 
Florida  Institute  of  Tecfinology 
Melbourne,  FL  32901,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Growth  rates  and  population  densities  of  Corhicula  jiuminca 
were  studied  over  a  two  year  period  in  the  Upper  and  Middle 
St.  Johns  River,  Florida  Measured  grow  th  rates  were  compared 
with  published  data  from  other  systems,  and  factors  influencing 
growth  rates  were  identified.  Growth  rates  of  C.  fluminea  were 
affected  by  flow  rate  and  sediment  type,  and  ranged  between 
0.0043  and  0.0437  mm/day  in  this  study.  Corlncula  were  found 
to  dominate  the  sandy  sediment  regions,  usually  characterized 
by  higher  flow  rates,  while  unionid  mussels  inhabited  the  more 
flocculent  organic  sediments  present  in  slower  moving  water. 
Of  the  1,6.50  bivalves  collected  from  dredge  samples,  79.3% 
were  C.  fluminea  and  20.7/';  were  unionids.  Unionid  growth 
was  adversely  affected  by  the  presence  of  Corlncula.  as  mussel 
growth  rates  decreased  when  numbers  of  C.  fluminea  in- 
creased. 


INTRODUCTION 

Corhicula  fluminea  (Miiiler,  1774)  has  spread  rapidly 
throughout  the  United  State.s  and  has  become  a  species 
new  to  many  freshwater  systems  throughout  the  country 
(McMahon,  1982).  It  appears  that  the  great  success  of  C. 
fluminea  is  primarily  due  to  its  lack  of  predators,  resis- 
tance to  environmental  stresses,  tolerance  of  many  sub- 
strates, high  reproductive  ability,  rapid  growth,  and  abil- 
ity to  filter  large  volumes  of  water  (McMahon,  1977; 
Mattice,  1979;  Graney  et  al,  1980;  Rodgers  et  ai,  1980; 
Gottfried  &  Osbourne,  1982).  Population  density  and 
growth  rate  data  from  various  aquatic  systems  have  been 
well  documented  (Gardner  et  ai,  1976;  O'Kane,  1976; 
Sickel,  1976;  Britton  et  al.,  1979;  Kng,  1979;  Buttner  & 
Ileidinger,  1980;  Scott-Waslik  et  ai,  1983;  Welch  &  Joy, 
19>-;4;  Joy,  1985). 

Mtfioiigh  macroinvertebrate  surveys  noting  the  pres- 
'•ula  fluminea  were  conducted  in  the  Upper 
S!  cr  by  Mascjn  and  Beianger  (1979),  Biizzi 

(1979)  '.ox  ai.'.l  Moody  (1980)  and  Llibre  (1982),  little 
is  known  about  the  population  dynamics  and  growth 
rates  of  the  clams  in  tjiis  river  system.  The  purpose  of 


this  research  was  to  determine  population  densities,  dis- 
tributions, and  growth  rates  of  C.  fluminea  in  the  I'pper 
and  Middle  St.  Johns  River  so  that  comparisons  with  other 
aquatic  systems  could  be  made  and  possible  factors  in- 
fluencing growth  rates  could  be  identified.  A  secondary 
purpose  was  to  investigate  the  effect  of  C.  fluminea  on 
the  growth  of  indigenous  unionid  bivalves. 

STUDY  AREA 

The  St.  Johns  River  basin  encompasses  18,290  sq.  km 
and  is  one  of  the  few  large  rivers  in  the  world  that  flows 
from  south  to  north.  The  river  originates  in  the  dense 
marshes  of  St.  Lucie  County  and  flows  approximately 
300  km  north  to  the  Atlantic  Ocean,  east  of  Jacksonville, 
Florida.  The  topography  of  the  study  region  is  relatively 
flat,  resulting  in  a  shallow  river-lake  system.  This  study 
considered  the  upper  and  middle  sections,  with  sampling 
sites  extending  from  Zig-Zag  Canal,  Brevard  County,  to 
Lake  Monroe,  Seminole  County  (figure  1). 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

Clams  were  collected  at  all  sites  from  August  1983  through 
May  1984.  Caged  clams  were  maintained  in  the  field 
during  three  separate  periods,  September  1983  to  July 
1984,  August  1984  to  February  1985,  and  February  1985 
to  July  1985.  Each  clam  was  measured  to  the  nearest 
0.05  mm  for  length  (greatest  anterior-posterior  distance), 
width  (greatest  distance  through  the  valves),  and  height 
(gre^itest  dorso-ventral  distance  perpendicular  to  the  the 
hinge  line),  using  vernier  calipers.  Clams  were  measured 
before  being  placed  in  the  cages  and  after  retrieval. 
C^ages  were  constructed  from  19-liter  plastic  buckets  and 
approximately  100  holes  1  cm  in  diameter  were  drilled 
in  the  sides  of  each  container.  The  bottom  of  each  cage 
was  filled  with  acid-waslied  .sand  to  a  depth  of  25  cm 
and  the  cage  fitted  with  a  locked  lid.  Ten  (first  and  second 
study  periods)  to  15  clams  (third  study  period)  were 
placed  in  each  cage.  In  addition,  five  cages  were  placed 


T.  V.  Belanger  et  ai.  1990 


Page  5 


R   60 
Ver o    Beoch 


lor  Ida 
ur  npike 


Figuro  1.  Thf  St  Johns  River  hasin  with  Ideation  of  sampling 
sites.  1  =  Zig-Zag  Canal*;  2  =  Lake  Sawgrass  Outlet;  3  =  Camp 
Holly  (Route  192)**;  -4  =  Lake  Washington;  5  =  Lake  Wash- 
ington Outlet**;  6  =  Lake  Poinsett  Outlet;  7  =  Route  50  Bridge; 
8  =  Lake  Harne>  Inlet  Bridge;  9  =  Lake  Harney  Outlet;  10 
=  Lake  Jessup  Outlet,  11  =  Lake  Monroe  Inlet*;  12  =  Lake 
Monroe  Outlet*;  13  =  Lake  Monroe  Power  Plant  Outfall;  *  = 
sampling  and  cage  site;  **  =  cage  site  only. 


at  the  Lake  Washington  site  to  determine  the  effect  of 
Corbicula  fluminea  populations  upon  the  growth  rates 
of  unionid  mussels.  In  this  experiment,  ten  unionid  mus- 
sels (Elliptio  sp.)  were  placed  in  each  cage  together  with 
C.  fluminea  in  densities  equivalent  to  500,  1,000,  2,000 
or  3,000  clams/m^.  After  five  months,  the  unionid  mus- 
sels were  retrieved  and  measured  to  determine  growth 
rates.  Water  quality  parameters  (depth,  dissolved  oxygen 
[D.O.],  water  temperature,  flow  rate,  pH,  and  percent 
sediment  volatile  solids)  were  measured  routinely  (at  least 
bimonthly)  using  standard  techniques  (A. PH. A.,  1980). 
The  mean  values  for  these  parameters  at  the  sites  are 
presented  in  table  1. 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

Population  Density  and  Distribution 

Population  densities  of  Corbicula  fluminea  varied  widely 
along  the  St.  Johns  River  system.  Of  the  1 1  sites  sampled, 
only  one  site  (Site  12)  was  completely  devoid  of  clams. 
With  the  exception  of  the  Lake  Jessup  site  (Site  10),  clams 
were  found  in  densities  greater  than  100/m-  at  least  once 


Table  1.  Mean  plusical  and  chemical  data  from  routine  sam- 
pling at  selected  sites  in  the  Upper  and  Middle  St.  Johns  River. 
Data  were  collected  at  least  bimonthK  from  August  1983  through 
May  1984. 


Sedi- 

ment 

Flow 

vol. 

Depth 

DO* 

Temp* 

rate* 

solids 

Site 

(m) 

(mg/l) 

CC) 

(ft/sec) 

pH 

(%) 

1 

2.9 

3.0 

20.0 

0.09 

6.69 

13.72 

c 

2 

2.0 

4.7 

21  0 

0  20 

7.19 

18.20 

:an 

-4 

1.5 

5.6 

23.0 

001 

7.70 

3.34 

b 

2.5 

6.1 

22.0 

0.30 

7.42 

2.00 

1 

7 

3  4 

4.9 

22.0 

0  19 

7.04 

4.73 

8 

2.6 

5.3 

20.7 

0.47 

724 

2.13 

9 

2.7 

8.0 

19.5 

0.29 

7.71 

7.35 

10 

2.4 

8.2 

20.4 

0.20 

8.74 

3.70 

11 

4.3 

5.7 

23.2 

0  39 

7.88 

474 

12 

44 

5.8 

24.3 

0.16 

8.23 

11.42 

13 

4(1 

5  5 

20  9 

0.17 

8.30 

3.14 

Measured  near  sediment-water  column  interface. 


during  the  nine  sampling  events.  Four  sites  contained 
densities  greater  than  1,000/m-,  with  Lake  Harney  Inlet 
(Site  8)  exhibiting  the  maximum  density  of  2,700  indi- 
viduals/m-  in  November,  1984.  Table  2  lists  the  popu- 
lation densities  of  C.  fluminea  recorded  throughout  the 
study.  Only  juveniles  were  found  in  Zig-Zag  Canal  (Site 
1),  where  they  did  not  become  established. 

When  only  adult  populations  are  considered,  some 
generalities  may  be  draw  n  from  the  data.  Corbicula  flu- 
minea were  most  abundant  in  sandy  sediment  with  low 
organic  content,  such  as  the  Lake  Harney  Inlet  site  (Site 
8),  where  the  highest  mean  monthly  density  of  839  clams/ 
m-  was  recorded.  Sandy  substrates  were  favorable  for  C. 
fluminea  growth  from  Lake  Washington  (Site  4)  down- 
stream to  the  Lake  Harney  Inlet  (Site  8),  and  clams  from 


100 


80-- 


o      60-- 


40 


20 


0 


Total:  1,268  clams 


1      2     4     6      7     8     9    10  11    12  13 


Figure  2.  Corhiciila  fluminea  population  distributions,  at  the 
Upper  and  Middle  St.  Johns  River  sampling  sites,  1983-84.  (% 
frequencN  =  Corbicula  percentage  of  total  collected  inverte- 
brates at  each  site;  dotted  line  =  only  juvenile  clams) 


Page  6 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104.  No.  1 


Table  2.    Carbicula  fluminca  population  densities  (no  'm^'),  from  sanipliriK  .sites  in  tlie  Upper  and  Middle  St   Johns  Hi\er  (.August 
1983-Mav  1984) 


198:5 


1984 


Site 

Aug 

Sep 

Oct 

Nov 

Jan 

Feb 

Mar 

.Apr 

May 

Mean 

SD 

1 





*1.417 

*233 

*250 

— 

— 

— 

— 

*211 

464 

2 



— 

33 

— 

150 

— 

— 

— 

— 

20 

50 

4 

600 

567 

217 

117 

217 

17 

67 

433 

17 

250 

229 

6 

183 

67 

33 

117 

700 

383 

583 

— 

— 

230 

263 

7 

200 

283 

117 

117 

433 

517 

1,033 

183 

217 

344 

292 

8 



— 

2,217 

2,700 

233 

17 

2,217 

167 

— 

839 

1,166 

9 



— 

— 

— 

— 

17 

17 

— 

100 

15 

33 

10 



33 

— 

17 

17 

— 

— 

— 

— 

7 

12 

11 

117 

367 

267 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

188 

162 

12 

— 

— 

— 

— 

NS 

NS 

NS 

NS 

NS 

— 

— 

13 

NS 

NS 

NS 

NS 

— 

783 

1,083 

50 

1,217 

627 

572 

*  — Ju\cni 

le  elanis 

onl\. 

NS — Not  sampled. 

these  sites  represented  68%  of  the  total  clams  collected. 
Helanger  et  al.  (1985)  reported  similar  results  and  sug- 
gested that  rivers  with  fine,  well-oxygenated  sand  sub- 
strates would  be  optimal  for  the  establishment  of  C. 
fluminca  populations  in  newly  colonized  sites. 

The  distribution  ol  C.  fluniinea  in  the  Llpper  and 
Middle  St.  Johns  River  (figure  2)  is  primarily  related  to 
sedinu'iit  t\  pe  and  flow  rate.  The  distribution  of  C.  flii- 
minea  varied  from  34.2%  of  the  total  fauna  at  the  Lake 
Harney  Inlet  site  (Site  8)  toO%  at  the  Lake  Monroe  Outlet 
site  (Site  12),  where  deep  deposits  of  organic  sediment 
occurred.  Also,  few  clams  were  observed  in  the  upper 
reaches  of  the  study  area  (Sites  I  and  2),  as  peat  sedi- 
ments, low  flow  rates  and  low  dissolved  o.xygen  conditions 
predominated. 

.\lthough  it  was  found  that  both  sediment  type  and 
Dow  rate  affected  the  density  of  C.  fluminea  populations, 
results  from  this  study  indicated  sediment  type  was  the 
most  important  limiting  factor,  as  high  flow  can  be  in- 
effective if  the  sediment  type  is  imsuitable.  For  example, 
samples  taken  from  organic  muck  and  peat  .sediments 


revealed  only  small  numbers  of  C.  fluminea.  even  though 
flow  rate  was  often  suitable.  The  reverse  situation,  sandy 
sediment  and  no  flow,  was  encountered  at  the  Lake 
Washington  site  (Site  4)  where  an  average  clam  density 
of  250/m-  was  found.  Flow  rate  is  an  important  factor 
because  it  is  responsible,  in  part,  for  the  transport  of 
essential  materials  to  the  clams,  such  as  food  and  oxygen. 
It  is  also  important  for  the  dispersal  of  waste  products 
and  clam  larvae.  However,  it  appears  that  a  very  high 
flow  rate  can  limit  C.  fluminca.  At  Camp  Holly,  ap- 
proximately 1  km  upstream  of  the  Lake  Washington  site, 
the  flow  rate  averaged  1.0  ft/sec  over  sandy  substrate 
during  sampling  trips  but  no  clams  were  found.  Obser- 
vations using  SCL'BA  revealed  that  the  high  current  had 
.scoured  the  sediment  surface,  exposing  hard-packed  sand. 
Under  these  sediment  and  flow  conditions  it  is  very  dif- 
ficult for  clam  larvae  to  become  established  in  the  river- 
bed. Instead,  they  are  generally  swept  downstream  to 
sites  where  the  current  velocity  has  decreased,  enabling 
them  to  settle  out.  The  natural  spread  of  C.  fluminea  is 
limited  bv  the  nonswimming  larval  stage,  thus  river  cur- 


Table  3. 

Elliptio  sp.  population  density  (no.   nr)  at  tlie  sanipl 

ling  sites,  1983-84. 

1  ^)8.> 

1984 

Mean 

Site 

Aug               Sep               Oct            Nov              Jan 

Feb           Mar 

Apr 

May 

SD 

2 
4 
6 

i 

S 

•I 

10 

1 1 

12 

1) 


100 


\i 


*4,866 


\S 


*  — Juvenile  cLiiiit-  ur.l\ 
NS— Not  sampled 


67 

133 

50 

17 

17 

17 

17 

— 

NS 


50 


NS 


67 


17 


17  50 


33 


NS  NS  NS 


NS 


NS 


\541 

1,622 

41 

52 

19 

21 

4 

8 

2 

6 

2 

6 

6 

17 

T.  V.  Belanger  et  at.,  1990 


Page  7 


rent  can  be  an  important  dispersal  mechanism  leading 
to  rapid  down-river  range  expansion  (McMahon,  1982). 
Corbictila  fltiminea  population  densities  in  the  St.  Johns 
River  are  intermediate  to  the  ranges  reported  in  other 
areas  of  the  United  States.  Hall  (19(S4)  reported  densities 
as  high  as  6,663  clams/m-  in  the  littoral  zone  of  Lake 
Norman,  North  Carolina.  Eng  (1979)  found  C.  fluminea 
population  densities  in  sand  bars  in  the  concrete  lined 
Delta-Mendota  Canal  in  California  to  be  between  10,000- 
20,000  clams/m-.  Population  densities  of  C.  fluminea 
were  noted  to  be  greatest  in  fine  sand  (452  clams/m-), 
followed  by  sand/gravel  substrata  (177  clams/m-)  in  the 
New  River,  Virginia  (Belanger  et  ai,  1985).  In  a  study 
on  the  Wekiva  River,  F"lorida,  Gottfried  and  Osbourne 
(1982)  reported  population  densities  of  1,210  clams/m". 
Gardner  et  al.  (1976)  reported  the  C.  fluminea  popu- 
lation density  increased  from  0  to  10,000  clams/m-  from 
1971  to  1974  in  the  Altamaha  River,  Georgia. 


Effects  of  Cohbicvl.x  Den.sities  on  Unionids 

I'nionid  mussels  (Elliptio  sp.)  were  observed  in  much 
lower  population  densities  than  Corbicula  fluminea.  Al- 
though mussels  occurred  in  high  density  (4,866  clams/ 
m-)  at  the  Zig-Zag  site,  this  number  represented  only 
larval  mussels  and  neither  C.  fluminea  nor  Elliptio  sp. 
became  established  at  this  site  during  the  study.  The 
largest  adult  population  of  unionids  was  found  at  the 
Lake  Sawgrass  site  (Site  2)  in  November,  when  133 
unionids/m-  were  collected.  All  other  sites  contained 
densities  of  50  unionids/m-  or  less,  and  adult  populations 
were  found  at  only  six  of  the  eleven  sites.  Table  3  shows 
the  mean  population  densities  of  unionids  at  the  sampling 
sites  and  indicates  that  density  decreases  downstream, 
with  few  mussels  occurring  downstream  of  the  Lake 
Poinsett  site  (Site  6). 

Elliptio  sp.  population  densities  were  inversely  cor- 
related to  those  of  Corbicula  fluminea  (F  test;  p  <  0.05). 
As  the  mean  C.  fluminea  population  density  increased 
in  a  downstream  direction  through  the  first  six  sites,  £/- 
liptio  sp.  mean  population  densities  decreased  to  zero. 
Of  1,600  bivalves  collected  from  dredge  samples,  79.3% 
were  C.  fluminea  and  20.7%  were  of  the  family  Union- 
idae  (Elliptio  sp. ).  Only  in  the  upper  reaches  of  the  river, 
where  peat  sediments  dominated,  were  Elliptio  sp.  pop- 
ulation densities  greater  than  those  of  the  Asiatic  clam. 
In  sandy  regions  where  both  bivalves  occurred,  C.  flu- 
minea predominated.  Thus,  Elliptio  sp.  predominated 
only  where  the  sediment  type  was  limiting  to  C.  flu- 
minea. 

SCUBA  diving  observations  at  Lake  Harney  Inlet  (Site 
8)  showed  that  unionids  do  exist  at  the  site,  even  though 
no  individuals  were  captured  in  the  dredge  samples,  and 
revealed  the  distributional  relationships  of  the  two  bi- 
valves under  natural  conditions.  In  general,  Corbicula 
fluminea  outnumbered  Elliptio  sp.  in  the  central  region 
of  the  channel  where  sandy  sediments  and  measurable 
flow  existed.  Toward  shore,  the  sediments  changed  from 
sand  to  silt-covered  sand,  and  then  to  sand  covered  with 


2.00 


.50 


1/1        1.00 


■»      0.50 


I  July   12    -   Oct.  28,    1984  ) 


0  500         1000        3000 

CORBICULA       DENSITY     (#/m2) 


Figure  3.    Cage  experiments  data  .showing  the  effect  of  Cor- 
hicula  fluminea  densities  on  grovvtli  of  Elliptio  sp. 


heavy  accumulations  of  silt  and  detritus.  Increasing  or- 
ganic silt  accumulations  near  the  river  banks  were  ac- 
companied by  increasing  numbers  of  unionids.  In  con- 
trast, the  number  of  C.  fluminea  decreased  as  silt 
accumulation  increased.  It  appeared  that  C.  fluminea 
could  not  tolerate  silt  accumulations  deeper  than  0.5  to 
1.0  cm.  As  the  silt  depth  increased  beyond  1  cm,  only 
unionid  mussels  were  observed.  The  size  and  shape  of 
the  shell  of  Corbicula  fluminea  may  contribute  to  its 
preference  for  sandy  substrates.  Corbicula  fluminea  shells 
are  more  circular  in  comparison  to  the  elliptical  shape 
of  the  Elliptio  sp.  Unionid  bivalves,  being  elliptical  and 
usually  larger,  may  extend  their  shells  and  siphons  be- 
yond the  silt  while  still  remaining  within  the  firm  sandy 
substrate  below.  In  the  case  of  C.  fluminea.  only  large 
specimens  would  be  able  to  accomplish  this.  Smaller  C. 
fluminea.  such  as  those  found  at  Site  8  (20-25  mm  size 
class),  would  not  be  able  to  extend  their  siphons  beyond 
the  silt  or  muck  layer  to  the  more  oxygenated  flowing 
river  water.  The  20-25  mm  and  15-20  mm  shell-length 
size  classes  were  the  dominant  groups  collected  in  the 
St.  Johns  River,  comprising  46%-  and  23%  of  the  C  flu- 
minea found,  respectively. 

Several  investigators  have  reported  that  Corbicula  flu- 
minea can  outcompete  native  unionid  and  sphaeriid  bi- 
valves (Boozer  &  Mirkes,  1979;  Cooper  &  Johnson,  1980; 
Taylor  &  Hughart,  1981).  In  thisstud\  ,  growth  of  Elliptio 
sp.  and  C.  fluminea  were  observed  together  to  confirm 
previous  observations  that  unionid  population  densities 
are  inversely  correlated  with  C.  fluminea  population 
densities.  Elliptio  sp.  mussels,  placed  in  control  cages, 
increased  their  shell  length  by  an  average  of  1.76  mm 
during  the  period  between  July  12  and  October  28,  1984. 
Elliptio  sp.  growth  rates  in  cages  that  contained  various 
densities  of  C.  fluminea  were  reduced  and  the  reductions 
in  growth  were  related  to  the  po[)ulation  density  of  the 
Asiatic  clams  in  each  particular  cage.  Figure  3  shows  the 


Page  8 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  1 


Table  4.    Curbicula  growth  rales  from  representative  areas  of  the  I  nited  States 


Growth  rale 

Site 

Measurement  period 

(mm/day) 

Reference 

St.  Johns  River,  FL 

Lake  Washington 

10/28/84-2/22/85 

0.03 

This  Study' 

Lake  Monroe  Inlet 

8/15/84-2/23/85 

0.0197 

Lake  Monroe  Outlet 

8/13  S-)-2  23/85 

0.0296 

Lake  Washington 

2/23  85-7  22/85 

0.0112 

Lake  Harnev  Inlet 

2/23/85-6/30/95 

0.0437 

St.  Johns  River.  FL 

Zig-Zag  Canal 

1/8/84-7/2/84 

0.0063 

Camp  Holly 

9/15/83-7/2/84 

0,0273 

Lake  Washington 

1/8/84-7/2/84 

0.0060 

Lake  Monroe  Outlet 

11/13/83-7/2/84 

0.0043 

Southern  Illinois  Fish  Poiul 

Summer 

7/20/79-9/22/79 

0.012 

Buttner  and  Heidinger  (1980)- 

Winter 

12/6/79-1/16/80 

0.003 

Selected  Texas  Reservoirs 

1975 

0.044 

O'Kane  (1976) 

.Altamaha  River.  C,.\ 

1975 

0.072 

Sickel  (1976) 

Oelta-Mendota  Canal,  C\ 

2/20/73-6/25/73 

0.0516 

Eng  (1979) 

Lake  Renbrook,  TX 

Sandbar  Specimens 

6/7/75-9/9/77 

0.056 

Britton  et  al.  (1979)' 

Container  Specimens 

6/14/77-9/30/77 

0.054 

Kanawha  River,  WV 

Container  Specimens 

3/12/83-12/16/83 

0.094 

Jov  (1985)^ 

Lake  Frie,  OH 

6/82-9/82 

0,114 

Scott-Wasilk  ('/  al.  (1983) 

Kanawha  River,  WV 

Container  Specimens 

Summer,  1983 

0.136 

Welch  and  Jo\  (1984)^ 

1  =  19  liter  containers  (cages) — with  covers,  placed  on  the  bottom 

2  =  Open  top  cages,  0  3  m-  and  9  cm  deep,  placed  on  the  bottom. 

3  =  Floating  units  (each  unit  consisted  of  .5  cages). 

effect  of  C.  fluminea  population  den.sities  on  the  growth 
rates  of  Elliptio  sp.  The  reductions  in  growth  rates  were: 
19.3%  when  the  C.  fluminea  population  density  was  500 
clams/m-;  40.9%  for  a  density  of  1,000  clams/m-  and 
37.5%  at  a  density  of  3,000  ciams/m-.  The  steady  de- 
crease in  FJliptio  sp.  growth  is  evident  at  C.  fluminea 
population  densities  up  to  1,000  clams/m-.  Beyond  this 
point,  for  reasons  unknown,  growth  rate  reduction  seemed 
to  level  off.  The  decreases  in  growth  rate  of  the  Unionidae 
may  have  been  due  to  increased  competition  for  essential 
requirements  such  as  food  or  oxygen. 

In  summary,  the  growth  and  distribution  of  Corbicula 
fluminea  in  the  St.  Johns  River  .seems  to  be  related  to 
substratum  and  Dow  rate.  Elliptio  sp.  growth  was  ad- 
versely affected  by  the  presence  of  C.  fluminea.  How- 
ever, the  adaptability  of  this  unioiiid  mu.ssel  to  organic 
sediment  types  which  are  generally  uninhabitable  by  C. 
fluminea  may  serve  to  protect  it  from  the  dangers  of 
overcrowding  or  the  possibility  of  becoming  replaced 
altogether  by  populations  of  the  Asiatic  clam. 

Growth  Raiks 

A  summary  of  Corhicula  fluminea  growth  rates  at  the 
cage  sites,  and  ;i  comparison  with  growth  rates  reported 


from  other  areas  of  the  United  States,  are  presented  in 
table  4.  Fastest  growth  was  seen  at  Lake  Harney  Inlet 
(Site  8)  during  the  third  sampling  period  (0.0437  mm/ 
day),  as  all  conditions  for  growth  were  favorable  at  this 
site  (high  flow,  high  D.O.,  sandy  sediment).  In  general, 
growth  rates  in  this  study  were  intermediate  in  com- 
parison to  rates  reported  in  other  areas  of  the  United 
States  (table  4),  although  very  low  rates  were  measured 
at  the  Zig-Zag  (Site  1),  Lake  Washington  (Site  4)  and 
Lake  Monroe  Outlet  (Site  10)  sites.  The  average  growth 
rates  reported  by  Eng  (1979)  from  concrete  lined  canals 
in  (California,  were  0.45  and  0.70  mm  for  the  months  of 
March-May  in  1974  and  1976,  respectively.  By  com- 
parison, the  St.  Johns  River  C.  fluminea  grew  an  average 
of  0.70  mm  and  1.00  mm  during  the  same  months  in 
1984  and  1985.  The  data  in  table  4  were  collected  from 
many  different  aquatic  systems  with  site  specific  varia- 
tions in  habitat  conditions  which  undoubtedly  affect 
growth  rates.  Britton  et  al.  (1979)  reported  on  clams 
grown  in  lake  environments  in  northern  Texas,  while  the 
St  Johns  Ri\  er  clams  inhabit  hiimic-colored  waters  under 
both  lake  and  river  conditions.  The  most  important  fac- 
tors leading  to  slower  C.  fluminea  growth  in  the  St.  Johns 
River  than  in  many  other  areas  were  probably  the  lack 
of  food  due  to  low  flow  rates,  periodic  low  oxygen  levels 


T.  V.  Bellinger  et  al..  199U 


Page  9 


in  the  water  column  and  the  predominance  of  organic 
sediment  in  the  river. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The  authors  with  to  thank  John  Platko  and  Jim  Yount 
for  their  valuable  assistance  throughout  the  course  of  this 
research. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

.American  Public  Healtli  .Association  1980  Standard  methods 
for  the  examination  of  water  and  wastewater,  15tli  etl 
.\  P  H  A  ,  Inc  ,  NY 

Belanger,  S.  E..  J.  L.  Farris,  D.  S.  Cherry,  and  J.  Cairns,  Jr. 
1985.  Sediment  preference  of  the  freshwater  Asiatic  clam, 
Corbicula  fluminea.  The  Nautilus  99(2-3):66-73, 

Boozer,  A.  C.  and  P.  E.  Mirkes.  1979.  Observations  on  the 
Fingernail  clam,  Museulium  partumeium  ( Pisidiidae)  and 
its  association  with  the  introduced  Asiatic  clam,  Corbicula 
fiuminea.  The  Nautilus  94(4):1:30-1.'3.5. 

Britton,  J.  C,  D.  R  Coldiron,  L,  P  Evans,  C  Golightly,  K  D 
O'Kane,  and  J.  R  TenEyck.  1979.  Reevaluation  of  the 
growth  pattern  in  Corbicula  fluminca  (Miiller)  /)!;  Brit- 
ton, J.  C.  (ed.).  Proceedings  ot  the  First  International  Cor- 
bicula Symposium,  Texas  Christian  University  Research 
Foundation,  Fort  Worth,  Texas,  p.  177-192. 

BuUner,  J  K  and  R.  C  Heidinger.  1980  Seasonal  \ariations 
in  growth  of  the  Asiatic  clam,  Corbicula  fluniinea  (Bi- 
valvia:  C^orbiculidae)  in  a  Southern  Illinois  fish  pond  The 
Nautilus  94(1):8-10, 

Buzzi,  R.  A-  1979.  Macroinvertebrates  of  Lake  Washington. 
M.S.  Thesis,  Floriila  Institute  of  Technolog\ ,  Melbourne, 
Florida,  62  p. 

Cooper,  C.  M.  and  \'  W  Johnson  1980  Bivalve  Mollusca  of 
the  Yalobusha  River,  Mississippi,  Tlie  Nautilus  94:22-24. 

Cox,  D  T.  and  D  L.  Moody.  1980  .\nnual  progress  report 
for  research  project  F-.'33-4.  Florida  Game  and  Fresh  Water 
Fish  C^immission,  Tallahassee,  Pdorida,  218  p, 

Eng,  L,  L.  1979,  Population  dynamics  of  the  .Asiatic  clam, 
Corbicula  fluminca  (Miiller),  in  the  concrete-lined  Delta 
Mendota  Canal  of  Central  California.  In:  Britton,  J  C. 
(ed.).  Proceedings  of  the  First  International  Corbicula 
Symposium,  Texas  Christian  University  Research  Foun- 
dation, Fort  Worth,  Texas,  p.  39-68, 

Gardner,  J  .A,.  W,  R,  Woodall,  A,  A,  Staats,  and  J  F  Napoli 
1976  The  invasion  of  the  .Asiatic  clam  (Corbicula  rnan- 
ilcnsis  Philippi)  in  the  .Altamaha  River,  Georgia  The  Nau- 
tilus 90(3):1 17-125, 

Gottfried,  P  K  and  J,  .A  Osbourne  1982  Distribution,  abun- 
dance and  size  of  Corbicula  rnanilensis  (Philippi)  in  a 
spring-fed  Central  F'lorida  stream.  Florida  Scientist  45(3); 
178-188. 


Cirane),  H  L,  D  S  Cherr\,  J  H  Rodgers,  and  J  Cairns,  Jr 
1980,  The  influence  of  thermal  discharges  and  substrate 
composition  on  the  population  structure  and  distribution 
of  the  Asiatic  clam,  Corlricula  fluniinea.  in  the  New  River, 
Virginia,  The  Nautilus  94(4):  130-135, 

Hall,  J,  J,  1984,  Production  of  immaiuTe  C'orbicula  fluntinca 
(Bi\alvia:  C-orbiculidae)  in  Lake  Norman,  North  CJarolina, 
The  Nautilus  98(4):153-1.59, 

Jov,  J,  E.  1985,  A  40-week  study  on  growth  of  the  .Asian  clam, 
Corbicula  flumenea  (Muller),  in  the  Kanawha  River,  West 
Virginia,  The  Nautilus  99(4):1 10-1 16, 

Llibre,  J  H  1982  Benthic  macroinvertebrates,  biological 
indicators,  and  diversity  indices  ot  the  I'pper  St.  Johns 
River,  Florida  MS  Thesis,  Florida  Institute  of  Technol- 
ogy, Melbourne,  Florida 

Mason,  D,  R,  and  T  \',  Belanger,  1978,  Lake  Washington: 
final  report  Dei)artment  of  Environmental  Science  and 
Engineering,  Florida  Institute  of  Technolog),  .Melbourne, 
Florida, 

Mattice,  J,  S  1979  Interactions  of  Corbicula  sp  with  power 
plants.  In:  Britton,  J.  C.  (ed.).  Proceedings  of  the  First 
International  Corbicula  Symposium,  Texas  Christian  L'ni- 
versitv  Research  Foundation,  Fort  Worth,  Texas,  p,  119- 
1.38, 

McMahon,  R,  F  1977,  Shell  size-frequenc\  distrilnitions  of 
Corbicula  rnanilcnsi.s  Philippi  from  a  clam  fouled  stream 
condenser.  The  Nautilus  91(2):54-59. 

McMahon,  R  F  1982,  The  occurrence  and  spread  of  the 
introduced  Asiatic  freshwater  clam,  Corbicula  fluniinea 
(Miiller),  in  North  America:  1924-1982,  The  Nautilus  96(4): 
134-141, 

O  Kane,  K,  D,  1976,  .A  po])ulation  studs  of  the  exotic  bixaUe 
Corbicula  rnanilensis  (Philippi,  1841)  in  selected  Texas 
Resersoirs,  MS,  Thesis,  Texas  Christian  Universit\,  P'ort 
Worth.  Texas. 

Rodgers,  J.  H.,  D.  S.  Cherr\ ,  R.  L  Grane\,  K  L  Dickson,  and 
J.  Cairns,  Jr.  1980.  Comparison  of  heavy  metal  inter- 
actions in  acute  and  artificial  stream  bioassay  techniques 
for  the  Asiatic  clam  (Corbicula  fluminea).  In:  J.  G  Eaton. 
P.  R.  Parrish  and  A.  C.  Hendricks  (eds  ).  .Aquatic  Toxi- 
cology. .Am,  Soc,  Test,  Mater,  Philadelphia,  Pa,:  266-280 

Scott-Wasilk.  J  ,  J  S  Lietzow,  G,  G  Downing,  and  K,  L  Clay- 
ton, 1983,  Growth  of  Corbicula  fluminea  in  Lake  Erie, 
North  American  Benthological  Society  31st  .Annual  Meet- 
ing, La  Crosse,  Wise,  27-29  April, 

Sickel,  J,  B,  1976  Population  growth  and  productivity  of 
Corbicula  rnanilensis  (Philippi)  in  the  .Altamaha  River, 
Georgia,  ASB  Bulletin  23(2):96, 

Taylor,  R,  W,  and  R,  C,  Hughart,  1981,  The  freshwater  naiads 
of  Elk  River,  West  \'irginia  with  a  comparison  of  earlier 
collections.  The  Nautilus  95:21-25, 

Welch,  K  J  and  J  E,  Joy  1984  Growth  rates  of  the  Asiatic 
clam,  Corbicula  fluminea  (Miiller),  in  the  Kanawha  River, 
West  Virginia,  Freshwater  Invertebrate  Biology  3:139- 
142. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(1):10-15,  1990 


Page  10 


Multiseasonal  Tissue  Growth  Trends  in  Corbiciila  fliiminea 
(Bivalvia:  Corbiculidae)  from  the  New  River,  Virginia 


Francis  G.  Dohcrty' 
Donald  S.  Cherry 
John  Cairns,  Jr. 

Dt-parliiifiit  of  Biology  and 

I'niversity  Center  for 

Environmental  and  Hazardous 

Materials  Studies 
\  irginia  Foiytechnic  Institute  and 

State  University 
Biacksburg,  VA  24061,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Juvenile  and  adult  Corhirula  fluminea  were  collected  monthly 
in  1985  from  the  New  Biver  in  Narrows,  Virginia.  Shell  length, 
shell  height,  shell  inflation,  and  soft  tissue  dry  weight  were 
recorded  for  each  individual  Regression  analyses  among  all 
pairs  of  data  sets  were  calculated  monthly  All  comparisons 
among  shell  dimensions  and  between  shell  dimensions  and  dry 
tissue  weight  generated  coefficients  of  determination  (B-) 
>0.801.  In  all  instances,  comparisons  between  shell  dimensions 
and  the  cube  root  of  dry  tissue  weight  generated  higher  R- 
values  than  comparisons  between  shell  dimensions  and  dry 
weight.  A  comparison  of  monthly  regression  lines  generated 
between  shell  secretion  and  the  cube  root  of  dry  weight  suggests 
that  shell  accretion  and  ti.ssue  grow  th  are  not  equivalent  for  all 
individuals  in  a  population  and  are  dependent  on  initial  size 
of  an  individual  and  on  season. 

Key  words:  Corlncula  fluminea:  Asiatic  clam;  shell  dimen- 
sions; tissue  weight;  regression  analvsis. 


INTRODUCTION 

Studies  assessing  the  growth  of  Corbicula  fluminea  (Miil- 
ier,  1774)  have  been  conducted  previously  to  establish 
energy  budgets  for  juveniles  (Foe  &  Knight,  1986a),  de- 
termine the  effect  of  various  artificial  and  algal  diets  and 
suspended  sediment  on  growth  (Dauble  et  al.,  198,5;  Foe 
6i  Knight,  1985),  or  monitor  growth  rates  of  clams  under 
natural  conditions  (Welch  &  Joy,  1984;  Joy,  1985).  In 
general,  these  studies  monitored  individually  marked 
clams  or  narrow  size  ranges  of  clams  in  the  laboratory 
for  defined  durations  (usually  <30  days)  or  in  the  field 
for  as  long  as  4  years.  Potential  applications  for  data 
collected  in  such  studies  include  use  of  growth  rates  as 


'  Present  Address:  Syracuse  Research  Corporation,  Merrif 
Lane,  Syracuse.  NY  13210. 


a  sublethal  monitor  for  exposure  of  clams  to  to.xic  ef- 
fluents and  chemicals  (Reianger  et  ai.  1986a, b;  Foe  & 
Knight,  1986b),  estimation  of  soft  tissue  mass  based  on 
shell  size  in  aquaculture  efforts  (Joy  &  McCoy,  1975; 
Buttner,  1986),  calculation  of  condition  indices  to  deter- 
mine levels  of  physiological  fitness  (Joy,  1985),  and  per- 
haps as  a  means  by  which  decisions  may  be  reached 
concerning  optimal  periods  for  chemical  control  efforts 
in  fouling  populations.  Few,  if  any,  of  these  studies  ad- 
dressed growth  of  both  shell  and  soft  tissue  simultaneous- 
ly over  a  continuum  of  clam  sizes  in  a  natural  population. 
The  present  study  was  undertaken  to  document  rela- 
tionships in  tissue  weight  and  shell  size  in  a  natural  pop- 
ulation of  C.  fluminea  for  a  minimum  of  1  year  to  de- 
termine if  the  two  parameters  provided  equivalent 
conclusions  concerning  growth  in  C.  fluminea. 


MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

Specimens  were  collected  from  the  New  River  at  Nar- 
rows, Giles  County,  Virginia,  on  the  last  Monday  of  each 
month  during  1985.  Clams  were  sampled  by  means  of 
a  .3-m  handled  dredging  cage  (mesh  size  =  7.0  mm), 
permitting  collection  of  individuals  as  small  as  6  mm  in 
shell  length  (SL).  Clams  were  returned  to  the  laboratory 
within  2  hr  of  collection  for  measurement  of  shell  di- 
mensions and  dry  tissue  weights  (DW)  of  100  individuals. 
Voucher  samples  of  intact  clams  have  been  deposited 
with  the  Department  of  Malacology  at  the  Academy  of 
Natural  Sciences  in  Philadelphia  (ANSP  A12516). 

Shell  dimensions  measured  included  shell  length  (SL), 
the  maximum  anteroposterior  dimension;  shell  height 
(SH),  the  distance  between  dorsal  and  ventral  margins 
of  the  shell  measured  at  the  apex  of  the  umbo;  and  shell 
inflation  (SI),  the  lateral  thickness  of  a  bivalve  (Britton 
&  Morton,  1982).  Shell  dimensions  were  measured  with 
vernier  calipers  to  the  nearest  ±0.05  mm  on  the  intact 
animal.  Prior  to  shucking  the  soft  tissues  from  the  shell. 


F.  G.  Dohertv  cf  al.,  1990 


Page  11 


35i 


30 


15 


X 

'to 

u. 


u 

.2       10 

Q 


0- 


Discharge 
Temperature 


<         I         I 

J  F  M 


M 


J  J 

Month 


1  I 

O  N  D 


■30 


25 


U 


20 

3 

«^ 

(0 

b 

« 

15 

A) 

►- 

w 

0) 

10 

^ 

$ 

Figure  1.    Mean  vveekls  water  temperature  (Narrows)  and  mean  dail\  discharge  rate  (Radford)  for  the  New  River,  Virginia,  in 
1985. 


mantle  cavity  water  was  drained  from  the  clam  by  sev- 
ering the  shell  adductor  muscles  and  standing  the  clam 
on  the  ventral  edges  of  its  shell  over  absorbent  paper 
toweling.  Soft  tissues  were  scraped  from  the  shell,  trans- 
ferred to  preweighed  aluminum  pans,  and  dried  in  a 
drying  oven  at  80  °C  for  48  hr.  Pans  with  tissues  were 
weighed  on  a  Mettler  balance  to  the  nearest  ±0.5  mg. 
Abiotic  data  available  at  the  time  of  the  study  included 
New  River  water  temperatures  and  discharge  levels  pro- 
vided by  a  local  industry  and  federal  agency,  respectively 
(figure  1). 

Least  squares  regression  (LSR)  analyses  were  per- 
formed monthly  among  shell  dimensions  (SL,  SH,  SI), 
between  individual  shell  dimensions  and  DW,  and  be- 
tween individual  shell  dimensions  and  the  cube  root  of 
tissue  dry  weight  (CRDW).  Regressions  of  CRDW  against 
a  shell  dimension  resulted  in  a  linearization  of  the  allo- 
metric  relationship  between  the  untransformed  variables 
(Schmidt-Nielsen,  1984).  Generation  of  LSR  analyses  was 
facilitated  by  programs  (general  linear  models)  of  the 
Statistical  Analysis  System  (SAS  Institute,  Inc.,  1982). 
Coefficients  of  determination  (R-)  were  generated  in  con- 
jvuiction  with  the  LSR  analyses  as  a  feature  of  the  com- 
puter programs  employed. 

RESULTS 

All  comparisons  among  shell  dimensions  and  between 
shell  dimensions  and  tissue  weights  generated  a  R-  > 
0.801  (table  1).  The  highest  R-  values  were  generated 


between  SH  and  SL  for  shell  dimension  comparisons  and 
between  SH  and  CRDW  for  comparisons  between  a  shell 
dimension  and  dry  tissue  weight.  Values  for  R'  ranged 
from  0.988  to  0.996  and  0.895  to  0.970,  respectively. 
Linear  regressions  of  CRDW  against  shell  dimensions 
always  generated  better  lines  of  best  fit  than  regressions 
between  untransformed  variables. 

Intermonthly  comparisons  of  regressions  between  SH 
and  CRDW  revealed  marked  seasonal  trends  in  weight 
gain  and  loss  relative  to  a  constant  shell  size  (figures  2- 
5;  table  2).  The  monthly  regression  lines  are  presented 

Table  1.  Coefficient  of  determination  (R-)  ranges  for  com- 
parisons among  all  potential  pairings  of  shell  dimensions  and 
untransformed  as  well  as  transformed  dr>  tissue  weights  for  all 
collections  in  1985. 


Parameters 

compared* 

Minimum  R- 

Ma.vimum  R- 

SH,  SL 

0.988 

0.996 

SL,  SI 

0.980 

0  990 

SH,  SI 

0.922 

0.992 

SL,  DW 

0.826 

0-953 

SL,  c;rdw 

0.884 

0.958 

SH,  DW 

0.832 

0.949 

SH,  CRDW 

0.895 

0.970 

SF,  DW 

0.801 

0.935 

SI,  CRDW 

0.865 

0.953 

*  CRDW  =  cube  root  dr\   weight,  DW  =  dry  weight,  SH 
shell  height,  SI  =  shell  inflation,  SL  =  shell  length. 


Page  12 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  1 


Table  2.  Regression  parameters  and  coefficients  ol  dcternii- 
nation  (R-)  for  lines  of  best  fit  equations  predicting  the  cube 
root  of  dry  weight  from  shell  height  for  clams  collected  on  a 
monthly  basis  in  1985  from  the  New  River,  Virginia,  at  the 
colleclioti  temperatures  listiil 


Collec- 

tion 

temper- 

ature 

Month 

Slope 

Y-Iiitercept 

R- 

CO 

January 

0.0185 

0.031 

0.955 

2.0 

February 

0.0178 

0  033 

0.914 

5.0 

March 

0  0194 

0.037 

0.924 

7.8 

April 

0.0195 

0.073 

0.895 

15.0 

May 

0.0258 

-0018 

0.970 

19.4 

June 

0.0230 

-0.009 

0.960 

22.5 

July 

0.0215 

0005 

0.935 

22.0 

August 

0.0191 

0017 

0.939 

22.0 

September 

0.0182 

0  026 

0.956 

17.0 

October 

0.0178 

0.028 

0.943 

16.0 

November 

0.0188 

0  0.33 

0.960 

95 

December 

0  0192 

0028 

0.960 

2.0 

in  chronological  order  in  figures  2,  3,  and  4  to  illustrate 
the  month-to-rnonth  progressions.  Selected  monthly 
regression  lines  are  presented  in  figure  5  to  illustrate 
comparisons  between  seasons  Although  there  was  a  trend 
towards  declining  dry  weight  in  all  clams  in  February 
relative  to  the  initial  collection  in  January,  CRDW  in- 
creased among  all  clams  through  April  (figure  2).  This 


was  demonstrated  by  progressively  higher  Y-intercepts, 
indicating  that  increases  in  tissue  mass  surpassed  in- 
creases in  SH  (table  2).  As  a  point  of  reference,  a  15-mm 
(SH)  adult  possessed  81.5%  more  tissue  (DW)  in  April 
than  it  did  in  February.  The  relationship  between  CRDW 
and  SFJ  shifted  in  May  from  that  previousK  observed, 
as  demonstrated  by  an  increase  in  the  slope  of  the  regres- 
sion line.  Larger  individuals  (>13  mm  SH)  possessed 
more  tissue  mass  relative  to  SH  than  in  previous  months, 
while  smaller  individuals  (<13  mm  SH)  had  less  tissue 
relative  to  SH  in  May  than  in  previous  months  (figure  2; 
table  2).  Declining  slopes  and  increasing  intercept  values 
were  observed  from  May  through  October  (figures  3,  4; 
table  2)  until  a  distinct  increase  in  CRDW  relati\e  to  SH 
was  observed  in  November  and  December  (figures  4,  5). 
This  shift  in  the  regression  lines  coincided  with  major 
flooding  of  the  New  River  in  early  November  (figure  1). 
As  a  point  of  reference,  a  15-mm  (SH)  adult  possessed 
22  and  23%  more  tissue  (DW)  in  November  and  Decem- 
ber, respectively,  than  it  did  in  October. 

DISCUSSION 

Regressions  among  shell  dimensions  and  between  shell 
dimensions  and  tissue  dry  weights  generated  high  R- 
values  that  were  comparable  to  the  findings  of  other 
investigators.  The  approach  to  analysis  of  the  data  gen- 
erated in  this  study  differed  from  that  used  by  others,  in 
that  some  investigators  failed  to  transform  their  data  (Joy 
&  McCoy,  1975;  Rodgers  et  al.,  1977)  while  others  uti- 
lized a  log-log  transformation  prior  to  generating  lines 


06- 
04- 


^      0.2 


I      06-1 


?r>      0.4- 


02 


0.0 


— r- 
8 


12 


16 


20 


— r- 
4 


8 


— I— 
12 


—I — 
16 


20 


Shell  Height  (mm) 


Figures  2-5.  Ni'.nlhlv  lines  of  best  fit  for  the  cube  roots  of  tissue  dr\  weiglit  regressed  against  shell  height  for  CorhUula  fluniinea 
indi\idudK  o.Jlf.  I. d  troni  the  New  River,  Virginia,  in  (2)  January,  February,  March,  .Xpril,  and  May;  (3)  May.  June,  and  .August; 
(4)  August   SeptcMili  r   October,  and  November;  and  (5)  February/October,  ,\pri],  November,  and  December,  1985. 


F.  G.  Dohertv  ct  al.,  1990 


Page  13 


of  best  fit  through  regression  analysis  (Sickel,  1979;  Al- 
dridge  &  McMahon,  1978;  Kennedy  &  Heukelem,  1985; 
Foe  &  Knight,  1986a,  1987).  Comparisons  between  a  shell 
dimension  and  either  viscera  wet  or  dry  weight  reveal  a 
curvilinear  relationship  that  is  not  appropriate!)  ana- 
lyzed b>  linear  regressions.  While  log-log  transformations 
do  provide  a  linearization  of  the  relationship  between 
these  variables,  we  believe  that  use  of  a  cube  root  trans- 
formation may  be  more  biologically  appropriate,  because 
body  weight  is  a  function  of  volume  and  height  is  a 
measure  of  a  single,  linear  dimension.  Transformation 
of  weight  to  its  cube  root  permits  a  simpler  linear  regres- 
sion comparison  between  shell  dimensions  and  tissue 
weight  rather  than  regressions  between  log-log  trans- 
formed variables.  Previously,  Dauble  et  al.  (1985)  uti- 
lized a  similar  approach  by  regressing  the  square  root  of 
clam  weight  against  SL.  One  other  factor  distinguishing 
our  study  from  those  previously  reported  is  that  all  of 
the  above  cited  studies  used  either  SL  or  SI  in  regressions 
against  tissue  weight.  Our  data  demonstrate  a  lower  de- 
gree of  variability  in  measurements  of  SH  and,  therefore, 
greater  precision  in  the  estimation  of  tissue  weights. 

Regressions  of  CRDW  against  SH  (figures  2-5;  table 
2)  demonstrated  that  no  single  monthly  or  quarterly  es- 
timate of  tissue  mass  based  on  SH  can  be  extrapolated 
to  all  other  periods  of  the  year.  Consistent  slopes  for  the 
relationships  from  January  through  April  suggested  that 
the  individuals  from  all  size  classes  were  responding  to 
environmental  variables  in  a  proportionately  common 
fashion  through  either  the  loss  (January  to  February)  or 
accumulation  (February  through  April)  of  tissue.  While 
the  manner  in  which  the  data  were  collected  prohibits 
statements  concerning  actual  shell  growth  rates,  the  fact 
that  Y-intercepts  declined  and  increased  demonstrates 
active  soft  tissue  degradation  and  growth,  respectively, 
at  rates  not  comparable  to  shell  growth.  The  slope  of  the 
regression  line  describing  the  relationship  rose  markedly 
in  May,  documenting  a  change  in  the  relationship  among 
different  size  clams.  Larger  individuals  were  apparently 
accumulating  tissue  at  a  rate  proportionately  greater  than 
previously  observed.  Smaller  individuals  were  most  likely 
continuing  to  accumulate  tissue,  but  the  apparent  re- 
duction in  tissue  mass  relative  to  SH  probably  signified 
a  rapid  increase  in  rate  of  shell  growth. 

The  increase  in  tissue  mass  in  larger  individuals  ( ~  15 
mm  and  greater)  in  May  was  most  likely  in  preparation 
for  reproductive  activities,  while  the  marked  decrease  in 
slope  of  the  regression  line  from  May  to  June  could  have 
reflected  initiation  of  spawning.  Reproductive  effort  in 
this  population  for  1984  was  greatest  during  June  and 
July  (Dohert>  et  al.,  1987).  This  interpretation  is  consis- 
tent with  the  observations  of  Morton  (1982).  He  reported 
a  42?t  decline  in  the  slope  of  the  regression  line  between 
DW  and  SL  for  groups  of  Corbicula  fluminialis  collected 
both  prior  to  and  after  spawning.  In  contrast,  Aldridge 
and  McMahon  (1978)  did  not  find  significant  differences 
for  regressions  between  log  transformed  variables  of  SL 
and  DW  for  28  groups  of  Corbicula  fluminea  collected 
over  a  16-month  period.  The  gradual  reduction  in  slope 


from  June  to  October  may  have  reflected  a  continuing 
release  of  juveniles  by  adults,  although  the  need  for  in- 
creased energy  e.xpenditure  during  the  warmest  period 
of  the  year  may  have  also  contributed  to  the  decline. 

The  changes  in  CRDW  relative  to  SH  for  smaller  clams 
(~10  mm  or  less)  between  April  and  May  were  probably 
a  reflection  of  increased  shell  secretion  rather  than  tissue 
loss  or  resorption.  If  clams  of  this  size  were  sexually 
immature,  they  would  not  require  a  massive  increase  in 
tissue  to  accommodate  reproductive  efforts.  An  overlap 
of  the  April  and  May  regression  lines  for  clams  ranging 
in  size  from  ~10  to  14  mm  may  indicate  that  physio- 
logical activities  are  allocated  equally  to  shell  secretion 
and  tissue  growth.  This  interpretation  also  suggests  that 
size  of  an  individual  at  the  time  of  spawning  dictates  the 
total  number  of  veligers  released  by  that  individual. 

Increases  in  the  slopes  and  Y-intercepts  for  November 
and  December  could  have  been  due  to  tissue  growth, 
resulting  from  an  abundance  of  nutritive  material  as- 
sociated with  high  river  discharge  from  locally  heavy 
flooding  (figure  1).  Doherty  et  al.  (1987)  hypothesized 
that  high  river  discharges  provided  high  levels  of  nu- 
trients that  permit  more  than  two  spawning  episodes  per 
year  while  Foe  and  Knight  (1985)  concluded  that  sus- 
pended sediments,  up  to  a  concentration  of  150  mg/liter, 
do  not  adversely  affect  growth  of  the  Asiatic  clam.  Since 
lower  temperatures  during  these  months  might  result  in 
reduced  metabolic  demands,  the  potential  for  growth 
and  maintenance  of  tissue  mass  could  have  been  en- 
hanced. 

These  data  also  support  earlier  observations  by  other 
investigators  that  an  inverse  relationship  exists  between 
growth  rate  and  initial  size  of  an  individual  (Britton  et 
al,  1979;  Dreier  &  Tranquilli,  1981;  Welch  &  Joy,  1984). 
For  example,  a  6-mm  (SH)  juvenile  had  a  dry  weight  of 
2.7  mg  in  February,  whereas  the  dry  weight  of  an  in- 
dividual of  similar  shell  size  had  a  dry  weight  154% 
greater  in  April.  The  increase  in  tissue  mass  for  a  20- 
mm  (SH)  adult  was  only  68%  between  February  and 
April  (59  and  99  mg  dry  tissue  weight,  respectively). 

Similarly,  the  magnitude  of  the  difference  between 
regression  lines  between  any  two  months  is  unequal, 
supporting  observations  by  other  investigators  that  growth 
is  seasonally  influenced.  Both  Fuji  (1957)  and  Joy  (1985) 
observed  no  growth  (SL)  in  clams  maintained  at  water 
temperatures  <10°C.  Measurable  growth  was  observed 
when  temperatures  rose  above  14  °C,  while  the  greatest 
rates  of  growth  were  observed  at  24  to  30  °C.  Britton  et 
al.  (1979)  reported  a  slowing  of  shell  deposition  in  clams 
with  shell  >10  mm  in  length  during  winter,  while 
McMahon  and  Williams  (1986)  found  growth  rates  of 
Corbicula  fluminea  individuals  to  be  characterized  by 
large  seasonal  variation.  Mattice  and  Wright  (1986)  ob- 
served varying  growth  rates  for  the  Asiatic  clam  in  field 
studies  and  suggested  that  temperature  played  a  major 
role  in  growth  determination.  These  conclusions,  though, 
were  formulated  from  observations  of  shell  growth  rate. 
Our  study  demonstrates  that  growth  of  tissue  can  occur 
at  temperatures  below  those  which  appear  to  be  necessary 


Page  14 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  1 


for  measurable  increases  in  sliell  height,  length,  or  infla- 
tion (February  to  April;  October  to  November;  table  2). 
Russell-Hunter  et  at.  (1984)  have  reported  comparable 
observations  for  populations  of  freshwater  puimonate 
snails.  Comparisons  between  pre-  and  post-winter  sur- 
viving individuals  of  Helisoma  trivolvis  and  Lijmnaea 
palustris  revealed  reductions  in  soft  tissue  ranging  from 
19-169%  ba.sed  on  predictive  equations  between  shell 
and  tissue  ma.ss  for  pre-winter  snails. 

This  study  demonstrates  that  shell  growth  as  defined 
bv  increases  in  shell  height,  length,  or  inflation  is  not 
equivalent  to,  and  does  not  necessarily  parallel,  tissue 
growth.  Initial  size,  reflective  of  the  reproductive  ma- 
turit\'  of  an  individual,  and  season,  reflective  of  temper- 
ature and  food  availability  among  other  things,  are  pos- 
sibK'  major  factors  in  determining  whether  shell  or  tissue 
growth  will  predominate.  These  data  imply  that  regres- 
sions between  a  shell  dimension  and  soft  tissue  mass  gen- 
erated at  one  time  of  the  year  are  not  applicable  to  the 
same  population  in  other  months  or  seasons. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

This  research  was  funded  in  part  by  a  grant  from  Amer- 
ican Electric  Power  Company  and  a  Cunningham  Dis- 
sertation Year  Fellowship  awarded  to  the  senior  author 
by  Virginia  Polytechnic  Institute  and  State  University. 
Water  temperatures  and  discharge  rates  for  the  New 
River  were  provided  by  R.  Roy  (Celanese  Corporation) 
and  H.  Williams  (United  States  Geological  Survey),  re- 
spectively. Appreciation  is  extended  to  J.  Grudzien  for 
drafting  the  figures,  to  Daria  Donald  for  editorial  assis- 
tance, and  Betty  Higginbotham  for  typing  the  final  draft. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Aidridgf,  D  W  and  K  V  McMahoii  1978.  Growth,  fecun- 
dity, and  bioeneri^etics  in  a  natural  population  of  fresh- 
water clam,  Corhinilu  riuinilrnsis  Pliilippi,  from  North 
Central  Texas.  Journal  Molluscan  Studies  4^:49-70 

Belanger,  S.  E.,  13.  S.  Cherry,  and  J  Cairns,  Jr.  198(ia.  Sea- 
sonal, behavioral,  and  growth  clianges  of  juvenile  Corl/ic- 
ula  fluminea  exposed  to  chrysotile  asbestos.  Water  Re- 
search 20:1243-1250. 

Belanger,  S.  E.,  J.  L.  Farris,  I).  S  Cherry,  and  J  Cairns,  Jr 
19S6b.  Growth  of  Asiatic  clams  (Corlnrtda  sp  )  during 
and  after  long-term  zinc  exposure  in  field-located  and 
laboratory  artificial  streams.  Archives  Eru  ironmenlal  ( loii- 
laniination  Toxicology  15:427-4.34 

Brilton.  J  C.  and  B  Morton.  1982  A  dissection  guide,  field 
and  laboratory  manual  for  the  introduced  bivalve  Corlric- 
ula  fluminea.  Malacological  Review  Supplement  No.  3. 
82  p. 

Brilton,  J.  C,  D.  R  C;oldiron,  L.  P.  Evans,  Jr.,  C.  Golightlv,  K. 
D  O'Kane,  and  J.  R.  TenE\ck  1979.  Reevaluation  of 
I  Ik-  growth  paltern  in  Corbkula  fluminea  (Miiller).  In: 
liritlon,  J  (;  (ed.).  Proceedings  of  the  First  International 
Ciirlnnila  Svniposium.  Texas  Christian  University  Rc- 
scarcli  1-oiindalion.  IVjrl  Worth,  TX,  p.  177-192. 

Butlner,  J  K  l')8B  Biology  of  Corbicula  in  catfish  rearing 
ponds   In:  Brill. .n.  J   C   (ed.).  Proceedings  of  the  Second 


Inlernalional  C'orhicula  Symposium    .Xmerican  Malacol- 
ogical Bulletin  Special  Edition  No.  2:211-218. 

Dauble,  D.  D.,  D.  S.  Daly,  and  C.  S.  Abernathy.  1985.  F"actors 
affecting  growth  and  survival  of  the  Asiatic  clam,  Corbic- 
ula sp.,  under  controlled  laboratory  conditions.  In:  Card- 
well,  R.  D.,  R.  Purd\  and  R  C.  Bahner  (eds  ).  Aquatic 
Toxicology  and  Hazard  Assessment:  Seventh  Symposium. 
STP  854.  American  Societv  for  Testing  and  Materials, 
Philadelphia,  p    1.34-144. 

lioherty,  F  G.,  D  S.  C^herry,  and  J.  Cairns,  Jr  1987  Spawning 
periodicity  of  the  Asiatic  clam,  Corbicula  fluminea  in  the 
New  River,  Virginia.  ,'Vmerican  Midland  Naturalist  117: 
71-82, 

Oreier.  H  and  J.  Tranquilli.  1981.  Reproduction,  growth, 
dislribution,  and  abundance  of  Corlncula  in  an  Illinois 
cooling  lake.  /;i;  Larimore,  R  W.  and  J.  .\.  Tranquilli 
(eds.).  The  Lake  Sangchris  study:  case  history  of  an  Illinois 
cooling  lake.  Illinois  Natural  Historv  Survev  Bulletin  .32: 
378-393. 

Foe,  G  and  A.  W.  Knight  1985.  The  effect  of  ph\  toplankton 
and  suspended  sediment  on  the  growth  of  Corbicula  flu- 
minea (Bivalvia).  Hydrobiologia  127:105-115. 

Foe,  C.  and  A.  W  Knight.  1986a.  A  thermal  energy  budget 
for  juvenile  Corbicula  fluminea.  In:  Britlon,  J.  G  (ed.) 
Proceedings  of  the  Second  International  Corbicula  S>tn- 
posium.  American  Malacologiral  liulletin  Special  Edition 
No.  2:14.3-1.50. 

¥oe,  C.  and  A  W.  Knight.  1986b.  .\  method  for  evaluating 
the  sublethal  impact  of  stress  employing  Corbicula  flu- 
minea. In:  Brittou,  J.  G.  (ed).  Proceedings  of  the  Second 
International  Corlncula  Symposium.  American  Malaco- 
logical Bulletin  Special  Edition  No.  2:133-142. 

Foe,  G  and  A.  W.  Knight.  1987.  Assessment  of  the  biological 
impact  of  point  source  discharges  employing  Asiatic  clams. 
Archives  Environmental  Contamination  Toxicology  16:.39- 
51. 

F'uji,  A.  1957.  Growth  and  breeding  season  of  the  brackish 
water  bivalve,  Corbicula  japonica  in  Zyusa-Gata  inlet. 
Bulletin  of  the  Facult\  of  F"isheries,  Hokkaido  I'niversit) 
8:178-184. 

Joy,  J.  E  1985,  A  40-week  stud\  on  growth  of  the  .\sian  clam, 
Corlncula  fluminea  (Miiller),  in  ihe  Kanawha  River,  West 
Virginia.  The  Nautilus  99:110-116. 

joy,  J.  E.  and  L.  E.  McC^ov.  1975.  Compari.sons  of  shell  di- 
mensions and  viscera  mass  weights  in  Corbicula  nianilcn- 
sis  (Philippi,  1844).  The  Nautilus  8951-54. 

Keiuiedy,  V.  S.  and  L.  Van  Heukelem.  1985.  Gametogenesis 
and  larval  production  in  a  population  of  the  introduced 
Asiatic  clam,  Corlncula  sp.  (Bivalvia:  (-orbiculidae).  in 
Maryland    Biological  Bullelin  168.50-60. 

Mallice,  j  S  and  I,  D.  Wright  1986.  Aspects  of  growth  of 
Corbicula  fluminea.  .Vmerican  Malacological  Bulletin  Spe- 
cial lulition  No,  2:167-178. 

McMalion,  R.  F.  and  C.  J.  Williams  1986  .\  reassessment  of 
grow  th  rate,  life-span,  life-cycles  and  population  dynamics 
in  a  natural  population  and  field  caged  individual  of  Gor- 
bicula  fluminea  (Miiller)  (Bivalvia:  Gorbiculacea)  In:  Bril- 
ton, J,  (;.  (ed).  Proceedings  of  the  Second  International 
Corbicula  S\niposium  .American  Malacological  Bullelin 
Special  Edition  No,  2: 151-166, 

Morton,  B,  1982,  Some  aspects  of  ihe  [jopulalion  sirueture 
and  sexual  strateg\  of  Corbicula  ef  fluminialis  (Bivalvia: 
Gorbiculacea)  Irom  the  Pearl  River,  Peoples  Republic  ol 
China   Journal  of  Molluscan  Studies  48: 1 -23 

Kodgers,  J    H  ,  Jr  .  D    S    Cherry.  J    R    Clark,  K    E    Dickson, 


F.  G.  Doherty  et  al..  1990  Page  15 


and  J.  Cairns,  Jr      1977     The  invasion  of  Asiatic  clam,  Sickel,  J      1979.    Population  d>'naniics  of  Curhicula  in  the  Al- 

Corbicula  manilcnsis  in  tfie  New   River,   Virginia.  The  taniaha  River,  Georgia  7n.  Britton,  J.  C;.  (ed).  Proceedings 

Nautilus  91:43-4(1  ot   the  First   International  Corhiciila  .Symposium    Texas 

Russell-Hunter,  W    D.,  R    A.  Browne,  and  D    W    Aldridge  Christian  Llniversit\  Research  Foundation,  Fort  Worth,  p 

1984.    Overwinter  tissue  degrowth  in  natural  populations  69-80. 

of  freshwater  pulmonate  snails  (Helisoma  thvolvis  and  Welch,  K.  J.  and  J,  E.  Joy      1984     Growth  rates  ol  the  Asiatic 

Lymnaca  palu.slris).  Ecology  (55:22.3-229.  clam,  Corhiciila  flurninea  (Miiller),  in  tlie  Kanawha  River, 

SAS  Institute,  Inc.     1982.     SAS  user's  guide:  basics,   1982  ed.  West   Virginia,    Freshwater  Invertebrate  Biology  3:1.39- 

.SA8  Institute,  Inc.,  Gary,  North  Garolina,  923  p.  142. 

Schmidt-Nielsen,  K,    1984.    Scaling,  why  is  animal  size  so  im- 
portant'r*  C^ambridge  I'niversity  Press,  Cambridge,  242  p. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(1):  16-25,  1990 


Page  16 


Geological  Substrate  and  Human  Impact  as  Influences  on 
Bivalves  of  Lake  Lewisville,  Trinity  River,  Texas 


Raymond  W.  Neck 

Texas  Parks  and  Wildlife  Department 
4200  Smith  School  Road 
Austin,  Texas  78744,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

The  bivalve  fauna  of  Lake  Lewisville  (Elm  Fork  Trinity  River), 
Denton  County,  Texas,  consists  of  16  species.  Present  are  the 
introduced  Asian  clam  and  1,5  native  unionids.  Relative  abun- 
dances of  species  in  different  areas  of  the  reservoir  are  related 
to  inundation  history  and  geological  substrate  Inundation  has 
localK  extirpated  some  species  while  other  species  ha\e  flour- 
ished. Utilization  of  shell  material  for  the  cultured  pearl  in- 
dustry is  documented.  Ecological,  taxonomic,  and  zoogeo- 
graphical  notes  are  presented  for  each  species. 

Ketj  icords:  Freshwater  bi\aKes;  Lake  Lewisville;  Trinity  Riv- 
er, faunal  changes;  commercial  utilization. 


INTRODUCTION 

Little  is  known  of  the  detailed  distributions  of  the  fresh- 
water mussels  of  Texas.  Two  comprehensive  lists  have 
been  published  (Singley,  1893;  Strecker,  1931),  but  these 
compilations  are  in  need  of  updating.  Even  recent  treat- 
ments of  North  .\inerican  unionids  (Burch,  1973,  1975) 
do  not  adequately  cover  the  Texas  fauna.  The  only  stud- 
ies of  freshwater  bivalves  from  north  central  Texas  lo- 
calities cover  Lake  Texoma  (N'alentine  &  Stansbery,  1971; 
White  and  White,  1977)  and  Lake  ,\rrowhead  (Neck, 
1989b).  Murray  (1972,  1978)  has  summarized  the  unio- 
nids present  in  two  reservoirs  in  central  and  southern 
Texas.  Localized  faunal  surveys  of  freshwater  bivalves 
of  other  portions  of  Texas  have  been  published  recently 
(Neck,  1986,  1987,  1989a;  Neck  ti  Metcalf,  1988). 

Below  is  a  summary  of  a  survey  of  the  mussel  fauna 
of  Lake  Lewisville,  a  reservoir  in  north  central  Texas  on 
the  Elm  Fork  of  the  Trinity  River  (figure  1 ).  The  purposes 
of  this  survey  were  to  determine  relative  abundance  of 
resident  species,  intra-reservoir  distributions  of  various 
species,  and  human  impact  upon  this  fauna.  Justifications 
for  the  nomenclature  used  are  provided  where  proper 
usage  has  been  unclear;  nomenclature  follows  Turgeon 
pl  al.  (198S). 

Previous  reports  of  freshwater  bivalves  from  the  upper 
Trinity  River  drainage  have  been  published.  Flook  and 
Ubelaker  (1972)  reported  nine  species  from  a  single  lo- 
cality in  Lake  Lewisville.  Strecker  (1931)  reported  four- 


teen species  from  the  Elm  Fork  of  the  Trinity  River 
"near  Lewisville,  Denton  County.  The  naiad  fauna  of 
Dallas  County  (which  borders  the  southern  edge  of  Den- 
ton County)  was  studied  by  Read  (1954;  Read  &  Oliver, 
1953).  A  survey  of  unionids  of  several  reservoirs  of  Tar- 
rant County  (Fort  Worth,  to  the  west  of  Dallas  County) 
is  available  (Mauldin,  1972). 

STUDY  AREA 

Lake  Lewisville  (figure  2)  is  located  in  north  central 
Texas  in  central  Denton  County,  approximately  24  ki- 
lometers southeast  of  Denton  and  35  kilometers  north- 
west of  Dallas.  Impounded  watercourses  include  the 
mainstem  and  lower  reaches  of  some  tributaries  of  the 
Elm  Fork  of  the  Trinity  River.  The  Elm  Fork  of  the 
Trinity  River  is  formed  from  the  coalescence  of  many 
small  tributaries  in  Cooke,  Montague,  Clay,  and  Archer 
Counties  to  the  west  of  Denton  County. 

Lake  Lewisville  has  a  dual  history;  information  below 
is  from  Dow  ell  and  Breeding  (1967).  The  original  im- 
poundment (Lake  Dallas)  was  created  by  Garza  Dam 
built  during  1924  through  1927;  deliberate  impound- 
ment of  water  began  16  February  1928.  The  area  of  the 
original  impoundment  was  44.5  km-  at  spillway  eleva- 
tion. Original  capacity  was  2.4  million  cubic  meters 
(drainage  area  3,018  km-).  Accumulation  of  sediment 
became  a  severe  problem  in  the  original  Lake  Dallas.  By 
1952,  capacity  of  the  reservoir  had  decreased  19.3%  to 
1.9  million  cubic  meters.  Hydrochemical  and  vegeta- 
tional  conditions  of  Lake  Dallas  were  reported  by  Harris 
and  Silvey  (1940). 

Construction  of  a  second  dam  downstream  near  Lew  is- 
ville  was  begun  in  November  1948  and  completed  in 
.■\ugust  1955.  Impoundment  of  water  began  1  November 
1954.  Following  a  prolonged  filling  period  during  a  se- 
vere drought,  a  passageway  was  created  through  Garza 
Dam  on  28  October  1957.  The  combined  reservoir  system 
has  a  surface  area  of  approximately  94.28  km-  at  con- 
servation pool  level  (156  meters  above  mean  sea  level). 
Surface  area  of  the  flood  pool  (161  m  msl)  is  158.17  km^. 
Capacity  of  the  combined  reservoir  system  is  5.7  million 
cubic  meters  at  conservation  ()ool  and  12.2  million  cubic 


R.  W.  Neck,  1990 


Page  17 


Lake 
Bridgeppr  t 


.^Lahe  Ray  Roberts 

Lake   Lewisville 

Lake    Lavon 

Grapevine   Lake 

Lake  Ray  Hubbard 
Cedar  Creek   Res. 


Lake   Worth 
Benbrook    Lake 

Lake  Arlmgtor) 
Mountain  Creek    Lake 

Navarro  Mills  Lake 

Fairfield  Lake 


Lake  Livingston- 

TRINITY  RIVER  DRAINAGE 


Houston 
County 
fles 


Lake  Anahuac - 


Figure    1.     Mali  "f  TriiiiU    Knci    drainage,  Texas,  showing 
location  of  Lake  Lewisville  and  other  reservoirs. 


LAKE  LEWISVILLE 


Figure  2.  Map  of  Lake  Lewis\  ilie,  Texas,  showing  geological 
snlistrate,  reservoir  subdivisions  (Roman  numerals),  and  col- 
lecting localities  (Arabic  numbers;. 


meters  at  spillwav  level.  Drainage  area  above  the  dam 
is  4,300  square  kilometers.  Shoreline  of  the  conservation 
pool  is  appro.ximateK  295  kilometers.  Primary  purposes 
of  the  reservoir  are  flood  control,  municipal/industrial 
water  supply,  and  recreation. 

More  recentK  Smith  (1973)  studied  the  physicochem- 
istrv  of  Lake  Lew  is\  ille.  Nariation  in  water  phv  siochem- 
ical  parameters  was  found  to  be  due  more  to  the  original 
characteristics  of  the  basin  rather  than  the  length  of 
impoundment.  Algal  species  composition  was  fairly  uni- 
form throughout  the  surveved  portions  of  the  reservoir. 
Water  temperature  varied  seasonally  from  5.0  °C  to  28.5 
°C  and  pH  varied  from  7.3  to  8.4.  Alkalinit)'  varied  from 
90  to  107  mg/L  (mostly  bicarbonate)  for  area  II  and 
from  116  to  151  mg/L  for  area  I.  Nitrate  levels  varied 
from  0.354  to  3.588  mg/L,  while  phosphate  levels  ranged 
from  0.017  to  0.165  mg/L.  The  Lake  Dallas  basin  (area 
I)  had  greater  turbiditv'  and  higher  nutrient  enrichment 
(phosphate  and  bicarbonate)  than  area  II. 

This  reservoir  has  suffered  from  a  lack  of  name  stan- 
dardization. Originally  both  the  combined  impound- 
ment and  the  dam  structure  were  known  as  Garza-Little 
Elm  Reservoir  and  Garza-Little  Elm  Dam.  In  1955  the 
name  of  the  dam  was  changed  to  Lewisville  Dam  al- 
though the  reservoir  name  was  unaltered  Subsequently 
the  U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers  (which  operates  the 
dam  and  reservoir)  has  changed  the  name  of  the  reservoir 
to  Lake  Lewisville. 

The  surface  geology  of  the  area  covered  by  Lake  Le- 
wisville is  rather  simple  (VVinton,  1925).  The  eastern 
portion  is  underlain  bv  the  Eagle  Ford  Formation  and 
alluvial  deposits,  whereas  the  western  portion  is  under- 


lain by  the  Woodbine  Formation  and  limited  alluvial 
areas.  All  deposits  are  Upper  Cretaceous  except  for  the 
Pleistocene  and  Recent  alluvial  terraces.  The  Eagle  Ford 
consists  of  a  series  of  black  oily  shales  with  a  few  thin 
ledges  of  sandstone.  The  Woodbine  is  somewhat  variable 
( Winton,  1925);  several  lavers  of  indurated  sandstone  are 
separated  by  softer  sandstone,  loose  sand,  and  clav'  layers. 
The  Eagle  Ford /Woodbine  contact  is  aligned  approxi- 
mately along  a  NNE  to  SSW  line  and  passes  very  close 
to  the  axis  of  Garza  Dam,  w  liich  formed  Lake  Dallas. 

Climate  of  the  studv  area  is  transitional  between  mar- 
itime-subtropical and  continental-temperate.  The  near- 
est recording  weather  station  is  at  Denton,  where  the 
average  monthly  temperature  varies  from  7.2  °C  in  Jan- 
uary to  29.3  °C  in  .\ugust.  Extreme  temperatures  re- 
corded are  45  °C  and  —19.4  °C.  Annual  precipitation 
averages  804  mm,  but  has  varied  from  384  mm  in  1963 
to  1,433  mm  in  1957.  The  growing  season  is  226  days 
(27  March  to  8  November).  Weather  records  for  any 
particular  year  often  are  far  from  the  mathematical 
"norms"  because  this  region  is  characterized  b>  dramatic 
year-to-year  fluctuations.  Fluctuations  in  precipitation 
usually  are  larger  than  those  in  temperature.  Major 
droughts  occurred  in  the  1930's  and  1950's. 

Drought  during  the  mid  1950's  was  severe  enough  that 
1.2  million  cubic  meters  (98,470  acre-feet)  of  water  were 
diverted  from  the  Red  River  into  Lake  Dallas.  Water 
was  pumped  from  the  Red  River  in  Cooke  County  into 
Pecan  Creek  through  which  the  water  flowed  by  gravity 
into  the  Elm  Fork  of  the  Trinitv  River  (Dovvell  &  Breed- 
ing, 1967:36). 


Page  IS 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  1 


METHODS 

Twelve  survey  sites  (Appendix)  were  chosen  in  a  manner 
that  all  major  areas  of  the  reservoir  were  sampled.  Most 
of  the  sites  were  located  in  various  recreation  parks  built 
by  the  U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers.  Time  of  sampling 
activities  (Winter  1977  through  Fall  1978)  coincided  with 
an  extended  drought,  which  resulted  in  substantial  low- 
ering of  the  reservoir  level.  Many  hectares  of  reservoir 
bottom  were  exposed  to  air.  Bivalve  shells  were  extremely 
abundant  and  readily  counted. 

Survey  transect  areas  were  four  meters  wide  along  the 
water  edge  for  varying  distances.  Length  of  transects 
varied  from  50  to  70  meters,  but  some  were  lengthened 
be\ond  70  meters  in  order  to  increase  sample  number. 
Counts  should  not  be  taken  as  relative  densities,  but  as 
estimates  of  relative  species  occurrence  at  particular  sites. 
Only  paired  valves  were  counted  in  order  to  reduce  the 
effect  of  water  movement  of  "dead"  valves  to  localities 
unsuitable  for  the  species.  Such  movement  is  believed  to 
be  of  minimal  significance  because  most  valve  pairs  lay 
in  situ,  partialK'  covered  with  sediment  at  the  place  of 
death.  .After  counts  along  the  pre-selected  transect  were 
completed,  additional  lengths  of  adjacent  reservoir  edge 
were  walked.  Additional  species  at  times  were  added  to 
the  list  of  species  occurring  at  a  given  sampling  area. 
Such  occurrences  are  not  recorded  in  the  relative  counts 
for  a  particular  site  (tables  1  and  2). 

Representative  specimens  collected  during  this  study 
have  been  deposited  in  the  Dallas  Museum  of  Natural 
Historv. 


BIVALVE  FAUNA 

A  total  of  16  species  were  observed  at  the  various  sam- 
pling stations  around  the  reservoir  shore  (table  1).  All 
but  one,  Corhicula  fluminea,  are  native  members  of  the 
Unionidae.  No  fingernail  or  pea  clams  (family  Sphaeri- 
idae)  were  observed  during  this  study.  Below  is  a  list  of 
species  recovered  from  Lake  Lewisville  with  nomencla- 
torial  discussion,  publisheil  haliitat  notations,  and  habitat 
occurrences  in  Lake  Lewisville. 

Corbicula  fluminea  (Miiller,  1774)  was  not  abundant 
in  Lake  Lewisville;  no  living  specimens  were  found.  Fa- 
vorable habitat  areas  (moving  water  over  sand  or  gravel 
substrate)  were  in  small  creeks  feeding  into  the  reservoir. 
A  few  young  shells  (7  mm  length)  were  found  on  sand 
at  Fish-O-Hama  (private  commercial  development).  All 
specimens  from  Lake  Lewisville  were  referable  to  the 
"white  form"  (Hillis  &  Patton,  1982). 

Anodonta  grandis  Say,  1829,  is  an  extremely  variable 
taxon  as  several  names  have  been  applied  to  different 
phenotypes.  Read  (1954)  reported  this  species  to  be  the 
'most  abundant  and  widely  distributed  species  in  Dallas 
Coimty,  '  but  referred  his  specimens  to  A.  corpulcnta 
'-('opei.  1S.'34;  Strecker  (1931)  called  all  specimens  A. 
taaudus  Lake  Lewisville  specimens  tended  toward  the 
corpuhnln  phuiiolype  (largest  specimen  measured  148.3 
mm  in  slieli  Irngth).  A.  grandis  was  a  common  species 


in  Lake  Lewisville;  106  specimens  were  taken,  and  all 
12  reservoir  localities  were  represented  (table  1). 

Anodonta  imbecillis  Sa\,  1829,  occurs  in  the  eastern 
United  States,  throughout  the  entire  Mississippi  system, 
and  southward  through  the  Gulf  drainages  into  Mexico 
(Simpson,  1914:396;  Burch,  1975:15).  Mauldin  (1972)  re- 
ported A.  imbecillis  to  be  more  frequent  in  ponds  and 
small  reservoirs  than  in  large  reservoirs.  Only  18  indi- 
viduals of  A.  imbecillis  from  8  scattered  localities  were 
found  in  Lake  Lewisville  (table  1).  Anodonta  imbecillis 
probably  was  more  abundant  in  backwater  sloughs  and 
pools  of  small  creeks  that  drain  into  Lake  Lewiss  ille. 

Arcidens  confragosus  (Say,  1829)  is  distributed 
throughout  the  Mississippi  drainage  (Murray  is.  Leonard, 
1962).  In  Dallas  Co.,  Read  (1954)  found  A.  confragosus 
only  in  Parson's  Slough  in  shallow  water  with  a  "fair 
current  "  over  a  mixed  sand  and  mud  substrate.  This 
species  was  found  at  9  reservoir  localities,  but  only  16 
individuals  appeared  in  7  transects  (table  1). 

Amblema  plicata  (Say,  1817)  was  the  most  abundant 
naiad  in  Lake  Lewisville;  624  specimens  (38.8%  of  total) 
were  counted  at  12  transect  locations  (table  1).  This  species 
was  the  most  abundant  bivalve  at  all  locations.  Amblema 
plicata  occurs  throughout  much  of  eastern  North  Amer- 
ica, south  to  the  Nueces  River,  Texas  (Burch,  1975).  A 
number  of  taxa  have  been  established  for  the  A.  plicata 
complex  in  the  United  States.  Read  (1954)  reported  both 
A.  costata  Rafinesque,  1820,  and  A.  perplicata  (Conrad, 
1841)  from  the  Elm  Fork  of  the  Trinity  River  in  Dallas 
County.  Flook  and  Ubelaker  (1972)  recorded  both  A. 
plicata  and  A.  costata  for  Lake  Lewisville,  but  only  4  of 
150  were  referred  to  A.  costata.  These  two  forms  are 
believed  to  be  either  genetic  morphs  or  ecophenotypes; 
in  either  case  no  taxonomic  rank  is  recognized  herein. 

Quadrula  mortoni  (Conrad,  1834)  is  restricted  to  the 
eastern  half  of  Texas  (Strecker,  1931).  This  species  is 
represented  in  Lake  Lewisville  by  pustulate  and  non- 
pustulate  forms,  which  are  known  from  reservoirs  in 
neighboring  Tarrant  County  (Mauldin,  1972).  Some  of 
the  less  angulate  specimens,  particularly  those  with  a 
large  number  of  pustules,  approach  Quadrula  pustulosa 
(Lea,  1829).  However,  specimens  similar  to  Q.  pustulosa 
from  Lake  Lewisville  differ  from  Q.  pustulosa  from 
southeastern  Texas  in  general  shape  of  shell  as  well  as 
number,  form,  and  arrangement  of  pustules.  Specimens 
of  Q.  mortoni  differ  from  Q.  pustulosa  by  being  broader 
and  somewhat  flatter  along  the  dorsal  portion  of  the 
valves.  Individuals  of  Q.  mortoni  (pustulate  and  non- 
pustulate)  in  Lake  Lewisville  are  most  abundant  on  a 
sand  substrate,  even  if  the  sand  exists  only  as  a  shallow 
bar  over  bedrock  shale  (as  in  area  II). 

Shells  referred  to  t\  pical  Q.  mortoni  in  this  stud)  can 
be  keyed  to  Q.  houstonensis  (Lea,  1859)  b\  using  Read 
(1954),  who  reported  the  latter  taxon  to  be  "not  common 
in  Dallas  County,"  from  Elm  Fork  of  the  Trinity  River 
on  gra\el  bottom  in  about  a  meter  of  water.  Strecker 
(1931)  noted,  however,  that  Q.  houstonensis  from  the 
Elm  Fork  near  Lewisville  was  "rather  inflated  and  seems 
peculiar  to  this  branch  of  the  Trinity."  Examination  of 


R.  W.  Neck,  1990 


Page  19 


a 
o 
_o 

c 


a 


-J 


Z   °  ■- 


to   C]    a?   00   CJ   O^    C]    -^   CJ    ^    (M   CJ   O   (M    IC   -^ 

£  P 


C— irtM— IOC  —I  [~X1-T00  (£■ 

-^  <D        CM        oq 


|0)(M<MO-^t~-      \    X^      |-^0OI-a^»     O      <r>tC 


iC  o 


— '  t~-  c]  -r  — > 


Z^       I      ^       I      T    —    CD    X!       I      -H 


-^   00 


T       I     QC       I 


lO  -r  00  lo    I   — < 


^-rci— "O^TO     I    00     icoc^ot     I    00     r^r 


I  ^ 


*      C]    — <    CI    CO      I     ^       CO    O' 


CO  -^  a> 

00 


T    CO      I        —"CD 


|-;|-r|,^|^^|^^ 


I  -^  I    I  ??  "  -  I  2  I 


I  ■"'  r'  ,■;?  -  s  I  -  I 


»    coco*    CO*    io»    <y> 


<M    O)       —    00 


2. 


I    ^-o, 


I     CO      [     lO   — ( 


Oi 

c 

W) 

rt 

m 

(— > 

c 

■^ 

V, 

Clj 

._ 

_Q 

^_^ 

~c 

P 

c 

— 

- — 

r 

^ 

OJ 

-^ 

CJ^ 

.^ 

flu  mini 
grandi 
inihcci 

^■f 

a    o    a 

■iJ  -^ 

~^   "^    ~ 

'~    o    o 

*^     w 

y  s. 

"^  ~^ 

"t;  o  o 

'r*  "^ 

^3    a 

-^    <>- 

^    <    < 

<  -^ 

s-A   ,»r 

r—  1-^ 

,    at  ? 

■    o    c 


S  S  5 
5.  ^  t 
^  ?  ^ 


■"-■--:-J'~l'-ja,&.i~'r~      JT  — 


o. 


c 


Page  20 

THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104 

,  No.  1 

Table  2.    Relative  counts  and  percentages 

of  bivalves 

of  Lake 

Lewisville  and 

subdivisions 

1 

11 

III 

Total 

n 

r;** 

n 

^; 

n 

'■; 

n 

'■; 

Corbicula  fltiminea 

* 

— 

5 

0.6 

1 

0.2 

6 

04 

Anodonia  grandis 

16 

5.4 

50 

6.2 

40 

/  -  / 

106 

6.5 

Anodonta  imliecilis 

4 

1.3 

/ 

0.9 

/ 

1.3 

18 

1.1 

Arcidens  confragosus 

4 

1.3 

2 

0.2 

10 

1.9 

16 

1.0 

Aniblema  plicala 

128 

42.8 

301 

37.5 

195 

37.6 

624 

38.5 

Quadrula  morttmi 

3 

10 

8 

1.0 

2 

04 

13 

0.8 

Qiiarida  apictilala 

83 

27.8 

116 

14.5 

82 

15.8 

281 

17.3 

Tritogunia  verrucosa 

* 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

* 

— 

Lampsilis  hiidiana 

13 

4.3 

124 

15.5 

77 

14.8 

214 

13.2 

Lampsilis  satura 

— 

— 

* 

— 

— 

— 

* 

— 

Lampsilis  teres 

6 

2.0 

50 

6.2 

20 

3.9 

76 

4.7 

Leplodea  fragilis 

3 

10 

37 

4.6 

23 

4.4 

63 

3.9 

Polarrtdus  amphichaenus 

3 

10 

16 

2.0 

21 

40 

40 

2.5 

Potamilus  purpura! us 

26 

8.7 

43 

5.4 

19 

3.7 

88 

5  4 

Toxolasma  parvus 

* 

— 

6 

0.7 

* 

— 

6 

0  4 

TrunciUa  truncata 

10 

3.3 

37 

4.6 

22 

4.2 

69 

4.3 

Si^ecies 

15 

— 

15 

— 

14 

— 

16 

— 

Individuals*** 

299(13) 

— 

802(14) 

— 

519(12) 

— 

1,620(14) 

— 

%  of  Total  Sample 

18.5 

— 

49  5 

— 

.32  0 

— 

100,0 

— 

*  Present,  but  not  recorded  in  transect. 
**  %  of  transect  sample 
***  N'imiber  in  parentlieses  is  number  of  species  present  in  transect. 


shells  at  the  Streckcr  Museum  (SM)  from  the  Elm  Fork 
near  Lewisville  identified  as  Q.  houslonensis  by  Strecker 
(SM  325-329)  revealed  shells  of  Q.  pustulosa  that  are 
somewhat  more  ciuadrate  than  typical  Q.  mortoni.  No 
such  shells  were  found  in  the  present  survey.  Examina- 
tion of  other  shells  referred  to  Q.  houslonensis  by  Streck- 
er revealed  robust  shells  that  appear  to  represent  several 
species  of  Quadrula. 

Quadrula  nodulata  (Hafinesque,  1S20)  has  been  re- 
ported from  various  portions  ot  eastern  Te.xas  (Strecker, 
1931).  A  single  specimen  that  resembles  Q.  nodulala  was 
found  in  Lake  Lewisville  in  transect  samples.  Exami- 
nation of  specimens  from  Lake  Lewisville  that  resemble 
Q.  nodulata  indicated  that  these  shells  were  Q.  mortoni. 
These  Lake  Lewisville  specimens  did  not  exhibit  nodules 
on  the  posterior  ridge  as  in  typical  Q.  nodulata;  nodules 
are  restricted  to  the  middle  of  the  shell  (below  the  umbo 
area). 

Read  (1954)  reported  Quadrula  metanevra  (Hafin- 
esque, 1820)  from  adjacent  Dallas  County.  These  shells 
may  have  been  these  nodtdala-]\ke  shells  or  an  extremely 
angulate  Quadrula  apiculata. 

Quadrula  apiculata  (Say,  1829)  ranges  from  the  Rio 
Grande  through  all  Texas  streams  to  the  .\labama  River 
( Xeel,  1941).  The  southern  maple-leaf  mussel  is  the  sec- 
ond-most abundant  naiad  species  in  Lake  Lewisville;  281 
individuals  were  taken  at  all  12  sites  (table  1).  Read 
I  HJ.J4)  rcpiirtcd  two  phenotypes  in  Dallas  County  in- 
cluding l"lm  Fork  below  the  present  Lake  Lewisville:  1) 
"specinsu  [.(  1,  1  sfi2"  with  pustules  extending  to  the  ven- 
tral margin,  and  2    "for.sheyi  Lea,  1859"  with  pustules 


only  on  the  more  dorsal  portions  of  the  valves.  Read 
(1954)  reported  that  both  forms  prefer  sand  bottoms; 
"speciosa"  tended  to  be  found  in  shallow  water  while 
"forsheiji"  tended  to  be  found  in  fairK-  deep  water.  These 
morphological  tvpes  represent  genetic  variation  in  the 
Q.  apicidata  population,  but  they  ma>  also  be  the  result 
of  reduced  rates  of  pustule  formation  in  older  individuals. 
Neel  (1941),  who  treated  apiculata  as  a  form  of  Quadrula 
quadrula  (Rafinesriue,  1S20),  presented  a  discussion  of 
the  iorms  of  the  Q.  quadrula  group. 

Tritogonia  verrucosa  (Rafinesque,  1820)  has  a  wide 
distribution  throughout  the  Mississippi  drainage  and  oth- 
er Gult  coastal  tlrainages  from  Georgia  to  Texas  (\'al- 
entiiie  &  Stan.sbery,  1971).  In  Dallas  County,  Read  (1954) 
found  it  only  in  Elm  Fork,  where  it  was  "perhaps  the 
most  abundant  species,"  on  hard  gravel  or  sand  in  fairly 
deep  water  in  sw  ift  current  This  species  most  often  has 
white  nacre;  pink  and  purple  nacres  become  more  com- 
mon in  the  southern  part  of  its  range  according  to  Val- 
entine and  Stansbery  (1971),  who  found  few  specimens 
in  Lake  Texoma  (all  of  which  had  white  nacre).  All 
specimens  located  in  this  study  have  white  nacre.  This 
spe'cies  is  extreme!)  uncommon  in  Lake  Lewisville;  no 
specimens  were  encountered  in  the  transect  censuses  (only 
one  specimen  was  found,  at  Graveyard  Slough,  which  is 
near  an  incoming  creek,  w  hich  would  "freshen"  the  water 
i)ualitv  )  The  raritv  of  T.  verrtico.sa  in  Lake  Lewisville 
is  the  result  ol  its  requirement  for  a  rapid  current  of 
water. 

Lampsilis  hydiana  (Lea,  1838)  ranges  from  eastern 
Texas  and  Oklahoma  eastward  to  Arkansas  and  Alabama 


R.  W.  Neck,  1990 


Page  21 


(Uurcli,  1973:2U).  L.  hijdiana  was  reported  rare  in  Dallas 
County  by  Read  (1954),  who  found  it  only  in  Elm  Fork. 
L.  hijdiana  is  the  third  most  abundant  mussel  in  Lake 
Lewisville  (but  is  not  common  in  Area  1);  a  total  of  213 
individuals  were  counted  in  12  transects  (tables  1,  2). 
Shells  exhibit  phenotypic  variation  in  details  of  structure 
of  the  pseudocardinal  teeth,  but  this  variation  tends  to 
be  ontogenetic  (changing  with  age).  Rays  are  absent, 
present  on  the  entire  shell,  or  restricted  to  the  posterior 
half.  Rays  may  be  single  and  narrow  (about  0.1  mm 
wide)  or  may  coalesce  into  stripes  (whose  widths  ap- 
proach 3  mm).  Spacing  between  rays  varies  such  that 
80*^0  of  the  periostracum  may  be  greenish  in  contrast  to 
the  yellowish  horn  color  of  the  background.  Variation  in 
shell  morphology  may  reflect  genetic  influence  by  Lamp- 
silis  luteola  (Lamarck,  1819),  a  species  that  ranges 
throughout  all  of  the  Mississippi  River  and  southern  Can- 
ada east  of  the  Rock\  Mountains  (Burch,  1973:21);  /;/- 
teola  intergrades  with  hijdiana  in  Louisiana  and  southern 
Arkansas  (Stansbery,  1983). 

Lampsilis  satiira  (Lea,  1852),  the  southernmost  species 
ot  the  Lampsilis  ovata  (Say,  1817)  group,  is  restricted  to 
westernmost  Louisiana  and  eastern  Te.xas  (D.  H.  Stans- 
bery, personal  communication).  A  single  shell  was  found 
in  Lake  Lewisville  at  station  7  (table  1).  This  specimen 
is  small  (47.6  mm,  shell  length)  and  had  been  dead  for 
several  years  before  reco\er\.  The  umbo  is  somewhat 
higher  than  those  of  most  L.  satura  from  eastern  Texas. 
The  recovered  specimen  probably  represents  a  remnant 
population  (possibly  now  extirpated)  adapted  to  a  free- 
flowing  stream.  Read  (1954)  reported  Lampsilis  vcntri- 
cosa  (Barnes,  1823)  as  rare  in  Dallas  County;  this  record 
probably  refers  to  L.  satura. 

Lampsilis  teres  (Rafinesque,  1820)  was  reported  b\ 
Read  (1954)  as  being  not  ver\'  abundant  in  Dallas  Count\ 
on  soft  mud  substrate,  but  found  in  the  side  of  a  tight 
mud  bank.  Lampsdis  fallaciosa  Smith,  1899,  has  been 
utilized  to  refer  to  a  smaller  form  with  greenish  rays  (not 
found  in  Lake  Lewisville  but  found  in  Elm  Fork  below 
Lewis\ille  Dam  during  this  stud\  ).  \alentine  and  Stans- 
bery (1971)  suggested  that  Lampsilis  fallaciosa  may  have 
been  replaced  by  L.  teres  in  Oklahoma  during  the  twen- 
tieth century  after  they  compared  their  contemporary 
collections  with  those  of  Isely  (1924).  White  and  White 
(1977)  reported  the  two  forms  from  Lake  Texoma  in 
similar  habitats  but  in  different  arms  of  the  reservoir.  L. 
teres  was  found  at  every  locality  sampled  in  this  study; 
a  total  of  76  individuals  were  counted  in  11  transects 
(table  1). 

Leptodea  fragilis  (Rafinesque,  1820)  occurs  through- 
out most  of  the  eastern  United  States  (Valentine  &  Stans- 
bery, 1971).  Read  (1954)  found  L.  jragilis  widely  dis- 
tributed in  Dallas  County  in  soft  sand  and  muck.  L. 
fragilis  was  found  at  all  12  of  my  sample  sites  although 
only  63  individuals  were  found  in  eleven  transects  (table 
1).  This  species  was  more  abundant  on  sand  than  on  clay 
substrates,  although  1  found  L.  fragilis  in  mud  at  the 
base  of  a  terrace  cutbank  in  moving  water  in  the  Elm 
Fork  above  Lake  Lewisville. 


PotamUus  ainphichaenus  (Frierson,  1898),  is  known 
from  the  Brazos,  Trinity  and  Sabine  Rivers  of  Texas  and 
westernmost  Louisiana  (Strecker,  1931).  Despite  Frier- 
son's  (1898)  statement  that  P.  amphichaenus  was  "one 
oi  the  most  distinct  and  remarkable  Unios,  this  taxon 
is  little  known  today.  Specimens  of  P.  amphichaenus 
from  Lake  Lewisville  can  be  separated  from  specimens 
of  Potamiliis  ohicnsis  (Rafinesque,  1820)  from  the  Red 
River  to  the  north  by  the  following  characters  of  P. 
amphichaenus:  1)  less  compressed  laterally;  2)  more 
prominent  sinus  in  the  posterior  portion  of  the  pallial 
line;  3)  prominent  umbo  scars;  4)  much  lower  wings, 
anteriorly  and  especialK'  posteriorly;  5)  large  gape  be- 
tween the  valves,  especialK  anteriorly;  and  6)  decreased 
prominence  of  pallial  line  anteriorly. 

Potamilus  purpuratiis  (Lamarck,  1819)  occurs  in 
streams  from  western  Tennessee  to  Kansas,  southward  to 
Louisiana,  w here  it  is  more  common  in  downstream  sites 
(Valentine  &  Stansbery,  1971).  Read  (1954)  found  it 
abundant  in  Elm  Fork  on  gravel,  hard  clay,  mud,  and 
sand.  P.  purpuratiis  is  the  fifth  most  common  naiad  in 
Lake  Lewisville;  88  specimens  were  counted  in  12  tran- 
sects, and  presence  was  noted  in  two  additional  sites. 

Toxolasma  parvus  (Barnes,  1823)  is  the  smallest  unio- 
nid  found  in  this  area.  T.  parvus  is  found  in  streams  from 
New  York  to  the  Dakotas,  southward  to  Texas  and  Al- 
abama (N'alentine  &  Stansbery,  1971).  Live  specimens 
from  Lake  Texoma  were  found  on  silt  or  soft  mud  in 
areas  protected  from  v\  ind  disturbance  (White  and  White, 
1977).  Read  (1954)  found  T.  parvus  widely  distributed 
in  Dallas  County  on  mud  bottoms  in  shallow  ponds  and 
sluggish  streams.  The  largest  T.  parvus  that  I  have  seen 
from  Lake  Lewisville  were  24.9  mm  in  length.  Only  six 
individuals  were  found  at  three  transects;  additional 
specimens  were  found  at  three  other  sites.  T.  parvus  is 
a  monomorphic  (presumabK'  monoeicious)  species  in 
comparison  to  the  larger,  dimorphic  (presumably  dioe- 
cious) Toxolasma  texasensis  (I.  Lea,  1857),  a  species  not 
known  from  Lake  Lewisville. 

Truncilla  truncata  Rafinesque,  1820,  is  known  trom 
the  Mississippi  River  drainage  and  westw  ard  into  eastern 
Texas  (Strecker,  1931;  Burch,  1973).  T.  truncata  was 
reported  from  Elm  Fork  on  soft  mud,  but  occasionally 
in  gravel  and  sand  (Read,  1954).  Color  of  periostracum 
of  Lake  Lew  isville  specimens  varies  from  \  ellow  ish  brown 
to  dark  brown;  a  few  specimens  have  narrow,  faint  rays. 
Sixty-nine  individuals  were  collected  from  11  transects. 

The  bivalve  fauna  of  Lake  Lewisville  as  recorded  in 
this  survey  consists  of  16  species  (one  corbiculid  and  15 
unionid  species).  Amhicma  plicata  is  the  most  numerous 
species  at  all  12  sampling  localities  and  includes  well 
over  one-third  of  the  individuals  counted.  The  seven  most 
abundant  species  in  the  transects  comprise  89.9%  of  the 
sample.  The  seven  least  common  species  comprise  the 
remaining  10. 1  %  of  the  sample.  Seven  species  were  found 
at  all  12  sampling  sites;  1 1  species,  9  or  more  sites.  Except 
for  the  two  species  found  at  only  a  single  locality,  all 
species  were  found  at  fi\  e  or  more  sites.  No  site  contained 
all  species,  but  all  sites  had  at  least  nine. 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  1 


DISCUSSION 
Zoogeography 

The  unionid  fauna  present  -Lake  Levusville  is  typical 
of  the  West  Gulf  Province  (Hoback  et  al  1980,  Neck, 
198'7a)  which  includes  the  area  drained  b>  rivers  west 
and'south  of  the  Mississippi  River  from  the  Sab.ne  system 
through  the  l\.o  Grande  System.  The  Trinity  Hjver  drain- 
age luts  the  Miss>ssippi  drainage  just  north  of  Lake 
Lewisvilie,  where  the  Red  and  Trinity  Rivers  are  sepa- 
rated bv  a  low  divide.  Little  or  no  recent  f aunal  exchange 
haf  occurred  because  of  the  very  'i-J^d  "umber  of 
mussel  species  in  the  Red  River.  Along  the  Coastal  Plain 
Se  drainages  of  the  Trinity  and  the  Red  are  separated 
by  the  Sabine/Neches  system. 

\he  species  present  in  Lake  Lewisvdle  represent  the 
•upland"  component  of  those  species  present  in  the  Trin- 
ity River  Strecker  (1931)  recorded  several  species  in  the 
lower  Trinity  (but  not  the  Elm  Fork)  that  are  not  present 
in  Lake  Lewisvilie,  because  the  pre-impoundmen  con- 
ditions of  the  Elm  Fork  were  not  suitable  for  such  large- 
stream  or  sand-substrate  forms.  Species  included  are 
StrophUis  undulatus  (Say,  1817),  Fusconma  cenna 
(Conrad,  1838),  Megalonaias  nervosa  (Rafmesque,  1820), 
Plcctomerus  domheyanus  (Valenciennes,  1827),  Irun- 
cUla  donaciformis  (I.  Lea,  1828),  and  Truncilk  macro- 
don  (1.  Lea,  1859). 

INTRA-RESERVOIR  DISTRIBUTIONS 

Lake  Lewisvilie  can  be  divided  into  three  major  subdi- 
visions, which  are  based  upon  natural  and  artificial  en- 
vironmental factors  (figure  2).  Area  I  consists  of  the  orig- 
inal Lake  Dallas;  this  area  is  underlain  by  the  Woodbine 
Formation.  The  substrate  presently  consists  of  silty  clays 
which  have  been  deposited  over  the  past  50  years.  This 
area  receives  sewage  outfall  from  the  city  of  Denton 
(1980  population-48,063)  and  probably  several  small 
towns  farther  upstream.  Area  II  consists  of  the  larger 
part  of  the  new  reserxoir  portion  of  Lake  Lewisvil  e 
which  is  underlain  by  thm  silty  clay  terraces  that  mantle 
the  Eagle  Ford  Formation  (shale).  Area  III  is  the  Hickory 
Creek  Arm  of  the  new  lake  portion,  which  is  underlain 
by  the  Woodbine  Formation.  Substantial  portions  of  this 
area  maintain  sandy  substrates  although  the  upper  reach- 
es are  covered  by  recently  deposited  sediments. 

The  Denton  County  soil  survey  provides  mtormation 
concerning  soils  now  covered  by  Lake  Lew^isvil  e  (Ford 
&  Pauls    1980).  Soil  types  presently  inundated  by  the 
original  Lake  Dallas  (area  1)  include  Callisburg  fine  sandy 
loam  Gowen  clay  loam,  and  Navo  cla>  loam.  Soils  pres- 
ently under  area  II  include  Altoga  silty  clay  Ferns-Hei- 
den'clays,  and  Heiden  clay.  Area  III  inundates  Bastrop 
fine  sand%-  loam,  Birome-Rayex-Aubrey  complex  (sands), 
Callisburg  fine  sandy  loam,  and  Crockett  fine  sandy  loam. 
Examination  of  the  data  concerning  relative  percent- 
ages of  species  in  the  three  major  subdivisions  of  Lake 
Lewisvilie  indicates  that  areas  II  and  III  are  more  siniilar 
to  each  other  than  either  is  to  area  I  (table  2).  This 


relationship  indicates  that,  as  a  factor  in  thi  '^^^  s  di 
tribution,  similar  period  of  impoundment  (11  and  111)  i 
more  important  than  similar  geological  substrate  (I  and 
111)  \lso  important  is  unrestricted  water  and  organism 
movement  between  II  and  III  whereas  an  old  dam  struc- 
ture with  a  narrow  breach  exists  between  and  I;  no 
direct  connection  exists  between  I  and  III.  Shallower 
water  depths  and  decreased  water  quality  in  area  I  may 
be  additional  factors. 

Except  the  stream  species  that  are  found  onh   near 
creek  entrances  and  probably  do  not  reproduce  within 
the  reservoir  {Lampsilis  satura  and  Tritogonia  verru- 
cosa), no  species  are  restricted  to  only  one  of  these   hree 
subgroups.  However,  as  indicated  above,  area  I  stands 
well  apart  from  the  other  two  in  terms  of  f aunal  com- 
position. For  example,  the  two  most  com'^^""  ""T't 
in  Lake  Lewisvilie  (Ambler^ia  plicata  and  Quadrula 
apiculata)  together  comprise  55.8%  of  the  entire  fauna^ 
and  the  corresponding  values  for  areas  II  and  HI  are 
comparable  (53.0%  and  53.4%,  respectively),  but  m  area 
I  these  two  species  comprise  70.6%  o   the  fauna.  Area 
supports  the  least  diverse  fauna  and  is  the  area  mos 
dominated  by  species  that  are  tolerant  of  environmental 
disturbance  by  humans.  ,.     ^u -J 

In  contrast  to  dominance  by  abundant  taxa,  the  third 
most  common  species,  Lampsilis  hydiana    is  distinctly 
least  common  in  area  I.  The  other  species  that  are  least 
abundant  in  area  I  are  Anodonta  grandis    Lampsilis 
teres  Leptodea  fragilis,  Potamilus  amphichaenus  and 
Truncilla  truncata.  Potamilus  purpuratus  is  distinctly 
most  common  in  area  I.  Arcidens  confragosus  is  more 
common  m  areas  I  and  III  than  in  area  II;  this  distribution 
pattern  indicates  a  preference  for  sandy  substrates,  pos- 
sibly in  inflowing  streams.  Rare  in  all  areas  are  Quadrula 
mortoni.  Anodonta  imbecilis.  Toxolasma  parvus,  and 
Corbicula  fluniinea.  . 

More  individuals  and  more  species  occurred  in  areas 
with  clav  rather  than  sand  substrates  in  Lake  Lewisvilie, 
although  a  few  species  are  more  abundant  on  sand  sub- 
strates (L.'pf  odea /ragi/«,  Quadrula  mortoni,  Arcidens 
confragosus,  and  Tritogonia  verrucosa)  Domination  ot 
the  fauna  by  one  or  two  species  was  frequent  in  clay 
substrates  and  rare  in  sand  substrates.  Such  relative  abun- 
dance relationships  were  also  observed  at  several  sites  in 
area  II  where  well-developed  sand  bars  overlay  shale 
bedrock   Within  areas  of  clay  substrate,  uniomds  were 
more  common  on  sites  with  exposure  to  wave  action. 
Small  sloughs  in  these  areas  seldom  supported  more  than 
a  few  bivalves. 

Faunal  Change 

Several  species  reported  from  the  Elm  Fork  by  Read 
(1954)  were  not  found  in  Lake  Lewisvilie.  Obhquaria 
reflexa  Rafinesque,  1820,  is  a  species  that  requires  hard 
substrates  and  moderate  to  fast  currents  (mqtuma  re- 
flexa was  reported  from  Lake  Texoma  (White  k  White, 
1977)  oiiK-  in  riprap  grasel  substrate  and  substantial  wmd- 
generated  xvater  movement;  this  was  the  onK   riverine 


R.  W,  Neck,  1990 


Page  23 


species  found  in  Lake  Texoma.  I  have  found  O.  rcflcxa 
in  the  Elm  Fork,  below  Lewisville  Dam;  isolated  indi- 
viduals could  survive  in  localK  favorable  micro-habitats 
within  Lake  Lewisville,  but  periodic  drought  conditions 
reduce  reservoir  elevation  and  feeder  creek  flows  to  such 
low  levels  that  survival  of  O.  reflexa  is  unlikely 

Only  two  unionid  taxa  reported  by  Strecker  (1931) 
from  the  Elm  Fork  at  Le\\  isville  were  not  found  during 
this  survey.  His  Qiiadrula  houstonensis  apparently  rep- 
resented shells  referred  to  Qiiadrula  mortoni  in  this  study 
(see  previous  discussion).  Read  (1954)  reported  Strecker's 
Fiisconaia  flaia  uiulata  to  be  rare  in  Dallas  County,  and 
found  only  in  the  southeastern  section.  Several  other 
species  were  reported  b\  Read  (1954)  in  Dallas  County, 
i.e..  Lasmigona  costata  (Rafinesque,  1S20),  Ohovaria 
subwtunda  (Rafinesque,  1820),  Pleurobema  cordatum 
(Rafinesque,  1820),  Qiiadrula  meianevra  (Rafinesque, 
1820)  and  Qiiadrula  petrina  (Gould,  1855).  These  species 
are  not  known  to  have  occurred  anywhere  in  the  Trinity 
River;  these  records  appear  to  represent  misidentifica- 
tions. 

Two  species  not  recorded  for  the  Trinitv  Ri\er  at  Lew- 
isville by  Strecker  (1931)  have  established  populations  in 
Lake  Lewisville.  These  species  are  Anodonta  grandis 
and  Anodonta  imbecillis;  the  former  has  become  the 
fourth  most  common  bivalve  in  Lake  Lewisville.  Increase 
in  abundance  of  these  Anodonta  has  been  reported  by 
Murray  (1982).  Causes  of  this  expansion  are  not  under- 
stood but  probably  invoke  emploving  a  large  number 
of  fish  species  as  hosts  during  the  glochidial  stage  of  the 
unionid  life  cycle  (Trdan  iT  Hoeh,  1982).  Read  (1954) 
suggested  that  fish  stocking  activities  "probabK  contrib- 
uted some  species  .  .  .  since  Strecker,"  but  offered  no 
supporting  evidence.  Changes  in  the  bivalve  fauna  of 
this  reservoir  are  similar  to  those  faunal  alterations  ob- 
served in  Lake  Springfield,  Illinois  (Parmalee,  1955;  Klip- 
pel  &  Parmalee,  1979). 

Human  Utilization  of  Fauna 

An  additional  human  impact  upon  the  unionid  fauna  of 
Lake  Lew  isville  was  observed  during  this  survey.  L'nion- 
id  valve  material  is  being  utilized  in  the  cultured  pearl 
industry.  The  high-purity  calcium  carbonate  of  unionid 
shells  (Nelson  et  al.,  1966)  is  formed  into  spheres  to 
provide  large  "seeds"  for  cultured  pearls  (Peach,  1983). 
In  August  1978  individual  shell  collectors  were  being 
paid  twenty  cents  a  pound  (total  wet  \\  eight  of  shell  and 
animal)  for  shells  of  Amblcma  plicaia  and  Qiiadrula 
apiculata.  At  least  one  collector  sold  500  kilograms  (1,100 
pounds)  in  a  single  day.  The  preferred  species  was  A. 
plicata.  which  had  to  measure  about  125  mm  in  length 
and  could  not  exhibit  worn  periostracum  on  the  ridges. 
Only  Amblema  plicata  from  the  "new  lake"  (areas  II 
and  III  in  discussion  below)  were  acceptable  as  shells 
from  the  "old  lake"  (area  I)  had  thin  layers  with  black 
or  purple  coloration.  Amblcnm  plicata  from  the  "old 
lake  possessed  thinner  shells  than  those  from  other  por- 
tions of  Lake  Lewisville,  shell  material  was  often  heavily 


sufiused  with  purple,  and  shells  with  white  nacre  did  not 
possess  the  bright  white  nacre  seen  elsewhere  in  the  res- 
ervoir. Stansber\  (1971)  found  that  young  A.  plicata  on 
fine  substrates  (similar  to  silted  portions  of  the  "old  lake" 
bed)  grew  more  slowly  than  A.  plicata  on  coarse  sub- 
strates. 

Individual  collectors  were  experiencing  the  effects  of 
resource  depletion  as  suitable  unionids  were  "becoming 
hard  to  find."  Lhiionids  in  some  isolated  coves  were  rea- 
sonably safe  from  collection,  but  some  collectors  used 
boats  to  get  to  these  sites.  Most  collectors  gathered  union- 
ids  in  water  that  was  less  than  two  meters  deep.  Unionids 
were  located  visually  or  tactilely  (\\  ith  hands  or  feet).  In 
deeper  water,  diving  equipment  was  used.  Neck  (1982b) 
reported  amounts  of  shell  removed  from  various  Texas 
reservoirs,  including  Lake  Lewisville.  The  500  kilograms 
of  A.  plicata  reported  above  consist  of  approximately 
1,430  animals  with  an  average  weight  of  350  grams. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  thank  R.  W.  Fullington  for  his  field  assistance,  en- 
couragement, and  general  introduction  to  the  intriguing, 
challenging,  and  befuddling  world  of  unionids.  Discus- 
sions w  ith  D.  H.  Stansbery  were  useful  in  understanding 
the  complex  problems  in  determining  proper  nomencla- 
ture. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Burch,  J  B.  197,3.  Freshwater  unionacean  clams  (Mollusca: 
Pelecvpoda)  of  North  America.  Biota  of  Freshwater  Eco- 
s> stems,  Identi.  Man.  II,  U.S.  Eiivi.  Pro.  Agency,  176  p. 

Burch,  J.  B.  197.5.  Freshwater  unionacean  clams  (Mollusca: 
Pelecypoda)  of  North  America,  revised  ed.  Malacological 
Publications,  Hamburg,  Michigan,  204  p. 

Dou  f  11,  C.  L.  and  S.  D.  Breeding.  1967.  Dams  and  reservoirs 
in  Texas.  Texas  Water  Development  Board  Report  48, 
267  p. 

Flock,  J.  M.  and  J  E.  L'belaker.  1972  A  survev  of  metazoan 
parasites  in  unionid  bivalves  of  Garza-Little  Elm  Reser- 
voir, Denton  Oiuntv ,  Texas.  Texas  Journal  of  Science  2.3: 
.381-392. 

Ford,  A  and  E.  Pauls.  1980.  Soil  survey  of  Denton  County, 
Texas.  U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  Soil  Conservation 
Service  and  Texas  .-Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Wash- 
ington, DC,  160  p. 

Frierson,  L.  S.  1898.  Unio  (Lampsitis)  aniphichacniis.  n.  sp. 
The  Nautilus  11:109-110. 

Harris,  B.  B.  and  J.  K.  G.  Silvey.  1940  Limnological  inves- 
tigation on  Texas  reservoir  lakes.  Ecological  Monographs 
10:111-143. 

Hillis,  D.  M.  and  J.  D.  Patton  1982.  Morphological  and  elec- 
trophoretic  evidence  for  two  species  of  Corbicula  (Bival- 
via;  Corbiculidae)  in  North  America.  American  Midland 
Naturalist  108:74-80. 

Isely,  F.  B.  1924.  The  freshwater  mussel  fauna  of  eastern 
Oklahoma.  Proceedings  of  the  Oklahoma  ,\cademy  of  Sci- 
ence 4:4.3-118. 

Klippel,  W,  E.  and  P  E.  Parmalee.  1979.  The  naiad  fauna 
of  Lake  Springfield.  Illinois:  an  assessment  after  two  de- 
cades. The  Nautilus  94:189-197. 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104.  No.  1 


MauldinV  L     1972.   The  bivalvemollusca  of  selected  Tarrant 
Countv  Texas  reservo.rs.  Masters  thesis,  Texas  (Ju.st.an 

University,  Ft.  Worth.  83  p.  ,     ,  ,    l    l  Rl  Texas 

u  n     1^72    Fresh  water  mussels  of  Lake  LBJ,  iexas. 

""  BnlSi^of  t!:.f  A^ican  Malacolog.cal  Union  1972:36- 

Murrt    H    D      1978.     Freshwater  mussels  of  Lake  Corpus 
Christi,  Texas.   Bulletin  of  the  .\mencan  Malacolog.cal 

Muriv'n  a^982:    Un.onuls  trom  Ind.an  sUes  in  McMullen 
and  Live  Oak  counties,  Texas.  Bulletn,  of  the  .American 
Malacological  Union  1981:10-11 
Murray  H  D  and  A.  B.  Leonard.    1962.    Handbook  of  umomd 
"""muils  in  Kansas.  University  of  Kansas  Museum  of  Nat- 
ural Historv  Miscellaneous  Publication  28   184  P 
Neck    R    W      1982a.     Preliminary  analysis  o    the  ecological 
zoogeographv  of  the  freshwater  mussels  of  Texas.  In:  Da- 
vis ]    R.  (cd.y  Proceedings  of  the  symposium  on  recent 
benthological  investigations  in  Texas  and  adjacent  states. 
Texas  Academy  of  Science,  Austin,  p.  .■>3-42. 
Neck,  R.  W.    1982b.    A  review  of  interactions  between  humans 
and  freshwater  mussels  in  Texas.  In:  Davis,  J,  R.  (ed.)^ 
Proceedings  of  the  symposium  on  recent  benthological 
Lestigations  in  Texas  and  adjacent  states.  1  exas  Academy 
of  Science,  .Xustiii,  p.  169-182.  ,  ,    ,     t,      ,i,„„i 

Neck   R   W.     1986.    Freshwater  bivalves  of  Lake  Tawakom, 
Sabine  River,  Texas.  Texas  Journal  of  Science  38  241-249. 
Neck    R    W      1987.     Freshwater  bivalves  of  the  Baffin  Bay 
drainage  basin,  southern  Texas.  Texas  Journal  of  Science 

Neck^^R'w    ^1989a.     Freshwater  bivalves  of  Medina  Lake, 
Texas:  factors  producing  a  low-diversity  launa.  Texas  Jour- 
nal of  Science  41.319-325.  ,.  ,    ,     ,  u      1 
Neck  R  W     1989b.    Freshwater  bivalves  ol  Lake  Arrowhead 
'        Texas:  apparent  lack  of  local  extirpation.  Texas  Journal  of 

Science  41:371-377.  .      i  •     i  ^c 

Neck    R   W   and  A.  L.  Metcalf.     1988.    Freshwaer  bivalves 
■        of  the  lower  Rio  Grande,  Texas.  Texas  Journal  of  Science 

40:259-268.  ,     ,  ,     , 

Neel   1    K     1941     A  taxonomic  stud>  ot  (Juadrula  qnadruta 

'(Rafinesque).  Occasional  Papers  of  the  Museum  Zoologv 

of  the  University  of  Michigan  448:1-8. 
Nelson,  D.  J.,  T.  C.  Rains,  and  J.  A.  Norris.    1966.    High-purity 

calcium  carbonate  in  freshwater  clam  shell   Science  152: 

1368-1370.  ,  .    ,         .    , 

Parmalee,  P.  W-  1955  Some  ecologica  aspects  ol  l^^  "^lad 
fauna  of  Lake  SpringGeld,  Illinois.  The  Nautilus  69.28-34. 
Peach  J  L  1983  Comments  on  the  commercial  shell  in- 
dustry, past  and  present  In:  Miller,  A.  L^i';™"Pi'''^'-  Re- 
port of  freshwater  mussels  workshop;  26-2,  October  1982. 
U.S.  .'\rmy  Engineer  Experiment  Station,  \  icksburg.  MS, 

p.  84-89.'  „  „ 

Read,  L.  B.    1954.    The  I'elecypoda  ol  Dallas  County,  I  exas 

Field  &  Laboratory  22:35-52. 
Read   L.  B.  and  K.  H.  Oliver.    1953.    Notes  on  the  ecology  ot 
the  freshwater  mussels  of  Dallas  County.  Field  &  Labo- 
ratory 21:75-80 
Roback,  S.  S.,  D,  J.  Bereza,  and  M    F.  Vidrine     1980.     De- 
scription of  Ablashesmyia  (Diptera:Chironomidae:lany- 
podinael  svmbiont  on  unionid  freshwater  mussels  (Mol- 
lusc a  BivaKia:Unionacea),  with  notes  on  its  biology  and 
zoogeography.  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomolog- 
ical Society  105:577-619. 
Smipson.  C.  T     1914.    A  descriptive  catalogue  ot  the  naiades 
or  pearly  freshwater  mussels.  Detroit,  1540  p. 


SmsileN   J   .V    1893.    A  prclmunary  l.st  of  the  land.  Ireshwater 
and  marine  Mollusca  of  Texas,  Annual  Report  Geological 
Survey  of  Texas,  1892.  4:299-343. 
S.nilh    1    \     1973.    Primary  productivity  and  nutrient  rela- 
■        tionships  inGarza-LittleElm  Reservoir.  Ph  D.  dissertation. 

North  Texas  University,  Denton,  118  p. 
Stansberv   D   H.    1971.    A  study  of  the  growth  rate  and  lon- 
gevity of  the  naiad  Amblema  plicata  (Say,  1817)  in  Lake 
Erie  (Bivalvia:  Unionidae).  Annual  Report  ot  the  American 
Malacological  Union.  1970:78-79.  ,  ^     ■  i  ,„J 

Stansberv,  D.  H.  1983.  Some  sources  of  nomenclaorial  and 
systematic  problems  in  unionid  mollusks.  In:  \  il  er,  A.  L.. 
(compiler).  Report  of  freshwater  mussels  workshop;  2b- 
27  October  1982,  U.S.  Army  Engin.  Waterways  Exp,  Sta.. 
Vicksburg,  MS,  p.  46-62. 
Strerker  1  K  1931.  The  distribution  of  the  naiads  or  pearls 
freshwater  mussels  of  Texas.  Baylor  University  Museum 
Special  Bulletin  2,  71  p  ...  r  , 

Trdan  R  J  and  W,  R.  Hoeh.  1982,  Eur>  topic  host  use  lor 
two  congeneric  species  ot  freshwater  '"^"f  l*  ?'''«■>  P^^^^ 
Unionidae:  Anodonto).  American  Midland  Naturalist  108: 

Turgeon't^D.,  A.  E.  Bogan,  E.  V.  Coan,  W.  K.  Emerson,  W. 
G  Lyons,  W.  L.  Pratt,  C,  F.  E.  Roper,  A.  Scheltema,  F^ 
g',  Thompson,  and  J.  D.  Williams.  198a  Common  and 
scientihc  names  of  aquatic  invertebrates  from  the  Umted 
States  and  C:anada:  mollusks.  American  Fisheries  Societv' 
Special  Publication  16:1-277, 
ValenUne,  B.  D.  and  D.  H.  Stansber> ,  1971.  An  mtroduc  ion 
to  the  naiads  of  the  Lake  Texoma  region,  Oklahoma,  w  ith 
notes  on  the  Red  River  fauna  (Mollusca:  Unionidae).  Ster- 
kiana  42:1-40.  , 

White,  D.  S.  and  S,  J.  White,  197,,  Observa  ions  on  the 
pelecvpod  fauna  of  Lake  Texoma,  Texas  and  Oklahoma, 
after  more  than  .30  years  impoundment.  Southwestern 
Naturalist  22:235-254. 
Winton,  W.  M.  1925.  The  geology  ol  Denton  County,  Uni- 
versity of  Texas  Bulletin  2544,  86  p. 

APPENDIX 

Below  is  a  list  of  collecting  localities  on  Lake  Lewisyille, 
Denton  County,  Texas,  that  were  used  for  this  study. 
Numbers  are  keyed  to  those  in  figure  3. 

1.  Northeast  end  of  -old'-  Garza  Da.B,  west  or  "old- 
Lake  Dallas  side.  ,  ,.,     ,     cu      . 

2.  Graveyard  Slough,  17.5  km  south  of  Shady  Shores 

community.  r    . 

S.  Willow  Grove  Park,  1.25  km  east  ot  center  ot  city 

of  Lake  Dallas.  r  ■        ■     -ll^ 

4.  East  Hill  Park,  ID  km  north  ot  spillway  ot  LewisvUle 

Dam.  ,      ,       .,,  ,f 

5.  Stewart  Creek  Park,   15  km  north  ot  spillway  of 

Lewisville  Dam.  , 

(,.   Ilackberrv  Park,  east  side  of  large  cove  m  south- 
eastern portion  of  Lake  Lewisville  State  Park,  3.6 

km  west  of  FM  423.  .,     ,    ,  n      i  /PMl 

7    Little  Elm  bridge  on  Farm-to-Market  Road  (FM) 
720,  .southeast  portion   1.5  km  southwest  ot   com- 
munity of  Little  Elm. 
8.  Cottonwood  Park,  l.S  km  south-southeast  of  Little 
Elm  bridge  (FM  720). 


R.  W.  Neck,  1990 


Page  25 


9.   Northeast  end  of  "old"  Garza  Dam,  east  or  "new" 
Lake  Lewisville  Side. 

10.  Oakland  Park,  0.7  km  northeast  of  Copperas  Point 
(across  Hickory  Creek  Arm). 

1 1 .  Fish-O-Rama  (private  commercial  development ),  just 


southeast  of  boundary  of  Hickory  Creek  Park,  0.85 
km  west  of  IH  35  E. 
12.   Sycamore  Bend  Park,  2.9  km  west  of  Interstate  High- 
way 35E. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(1  ):26-28,  1990 


Page  26 


A  Reaffirmation  of  the  Nomenclatural  Status  of 
Octopus  filosus  Howell,  1868,  the  Senior 
Synonym  of  Octopus  hummelincki  Adam,  1936 


Ronald  B.  Toll 

Depaitmcrit  i)l  Biology 
The  L  niversil\  of  llie  South 
Sc«aneo.  T\  37375  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Voss  (1962)  placed  Octopus  Ituinnicliucki  Adam,  1936  into  the 
synonyiiu  of  Octopus  filu.sus  Howell,  1868;  however,  the  ma- 
jority of  accounts  dealing  with  this  ta.xon  since  that  time  have 
continued  to  use  the  junior  synonym.  The  type  material  of  both 
taxa  were  reexamined  and  their  nomenclatural  histories  traced. 
O.  filosus  is  upheld  as  the  correct  senior  s\  nonvm  and  a  com- 
plete s)  nonynn  is  provided 

Key  words:    Octopus  filosus.  Octopus  huiniiuliucki.  Octopo- 


Hovvell  (1868)  described  Octopus  filosa  from  Santa  Cruz 
Island  (=  St.  Ooi.x  in  the  Virgin  Islands).  The  original 
description,  based  on  the  largest  of  several  live  animals 
Howell  had  seen,  is  brief  but  contains  details  of  body 
morphometry,  arm  lengths  and  the  lunnber  of  adoral, 
uniseriall)  arranged  suckers  along  each  arm.  Howell 
(1868:241)  commented  that  the  animal  was  "remarkable 
for  the  long  and  thread-like  terminations  to  the  arms 
.  .  .".  As  part  of  his  description  of  the  coloration  of  the 
live  animal  he  also  noted  (p.  241)  that  "it  changes  the 
color  of  its  spots  with  great  rapidity."  Howell  illustrated 
the  holotype  in  ventral  whole  view.  In  his  monographic 
work  on  the  Octopodinae,  Robson  (1929)  included  Oc- 
topus (Octopus)  filosus  based  .solely  on  Ilowell's  original 
description  and  corrected  the  gender  of  the  specific  ep- 
ithet. 

Adam  (1936)  described  Octopus  hummelincki  from 
Bonaire,  Netherlands  West  Indies  baseil  on  three  syn- 
types  (1  male,  2  females).  He  noted  the  presence  of  a 
pair  of  ocelli  located  between  the  eyes  and  the  edge  of 
the  web.  The  following  year,  based  on  the  syntypic  series, 
•Adam  (1937)  expanded  his  description  and  provided 
photographic  whole  views  of  two  of  the  types  and  iihi.s- 
traliori:i  of  the  hectocotylus,  penis,  and  fuiuiel  organ. 

Bused  .■!!  Howell's  description  alone,  Pickford  (1945) 
plated  Octopus  filosus  into  the  synonymy  of  O.  vulgaris 
bccau.se  o(  i,i  r  (jf-rception  of  a  lack  of  a  clear  morpho- 
logical distinition  between  several  Floridian  specimens 


of  O.  vulgaris  with  attenuate  arm  tips  that  approached 
the  condition  for  filosus  as  described  by  Howell. 

Voss  (1962),  in  a  report  on  the  cephalopods  in  the 
collections  of  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Phila- 
delphia, reexamined  the  holotype  ot  Octopus  filosus  and 
noted  (p.  2)  the  presence  of  a  "faded  but  distinct  ocellus 
beneath  each  eye  and  scattered  thin,  thread-like  papillae 
on  the  dorsimi  of  the  head  and  mantle  .  Based  on  this 
combination  oi  characters,  particularly  the  ocelli  (to  which 
Howell  s  comment  regarding  the  changing  colors  of  the 
"spots"  probably  refers),  Voss  established  O.  filosus  as 
the  senior  synonym  of  O.  hummelincki.  Voss  further 
noted  that  due  to  the  use  of  the  name  filosus  by  both 
Robson  (1929)  and  Pickford  (1945)  [an  additional  ref- 
erence to  this  taxon  by  Pickford  (1946)  apparently  was 
overlooked],  its  use  could  not  be  suppressed  by  plenary 
power  [e.g.,  invocation  of  the  50  year  ride  as  defined  by 
The  International  Ciode  of  Zoological  Nomenclature 
(ICZN,  1985:  Art.  79)]. 

Probably  because  \'oss'  1962  paper  is  relatively  ob- 
scure and  the  nomenclatural  situation  regarding  Octcjpus 
filosus  was  mentioned  only  briefly  (one  paragraph),  .Ad- 
am s  hummelincki  has  been  maintained  and  used  rou- 
tinely as  the  specific  epithet  for  this  taxon  in  subsequent 
accounts.  In  turn,  Howells  filosus  has  been  relegated  to 
remain  among  the  nimierous  taxa  recognized  as  junior 
synonyms  of  O.  vulgaris  and  as  such  is  \  irtualK  unknown 
to  a  new  generation  of  cephalopod  workers. 

In  order  to  verify  the  systematic  and  nomenclatural 
disposition  of  Octopus  filosus  and  O.  hummelitu^ki.  I 
reexamined  the  types  of  both  taxa.  The  holoty  pe  of  O. 
filosus  (Acadetny  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia 
A6450)  is  a  female  (ML  36  mm)  with  maturing  eggs, 
now  in  fair  condition.  Indications  of  both  ocelli  are  extant 
and  the  manllc.  ticad,  antl  basal  portions  ot  the  arms  are 
covered  w  itli  thin  papillae.  Two  oi  the  three  sy  ntypes  of 
O.  hummelincki  were  obtained  from  the  Zoologisch  Mu- 
seum-Universiteit  Van  Amsterdam  (1  male  with  sper- 
matophores,  1  female,  ML  21  and  18  mm,  respectively). 
Both  specimens  are  in  excellent  condition,  the  ocelli  are 
distinct,  and  the  mantle,  head  and  arms  are  ornamented 


R.  B.  Toll,  1990 


Page  27 


with  tall,  thin  papillae.  The  oiiK  other  octopod  with 
similar  ocelli  fouiKl  in  the  Atlantic  Ocean  is  O.  maya 
V'oss  and  Solis,  1966,  which  is  entlemic  to  the  Gulf  of 
Campeche,  Mexico.  In  addition  it  attains  large  size  (to 
2.0  kg).  My  reexamination  of  the  types  and  the  known 
distribution  of  ocellated  octopods  from  the  Atlantic  Ocean 
support  \'oss"  contention  that  O.  filo.siis  and  O.  hiim- 
melincki  are  s\  non\  ms. 

The  name  hummclincki  has  appeared  in  26  accounts 
including  the  original  description.  Of  these,  five  are  species 
catalogues,  three  others  include  Octopus  hummeliuchi 
in  a  dichotomous  key  onl\-,  and  two  more  cite  other 
papers  without  the  addition  of  new  data.  The  remaining 
16  papers  (which  include  2  unpublished  theses)  include 
new  information  of  a  systematic,  nomenclatural  or  bio- 
logical nature.  The  name  filosus  has  appeared  in  four 
svstematic-tvpe  treatments  within  the  last  fifty  years 
(Pickford,  1945,  1946;  Voss,  1962;  Toll,  1988).  Addition- 
ally it  is  listed,  without  comment,  in  the  synonymy  of 
O.  hiimmeliticki  b\  Burgess  (1966)  and  Roper  et  al. 
(1984);  however,  these  accounts  do  not  constitute  usage 
as  defined  in  Article  79c(l)i  of  the  ICZN  (1985).  As 
previously  noted  by  V'oss  (1962),  Howell  s  name  cannot 
be  suppressed  by  the  use  of  plenary  power  (see  ICZN, 
1985:Art.  79c).  .\s  a  result,  O.  filo.siis  is  here  reaffirmed 
as  the  senior  synonym  of  O.  hummclincki  and  should  be 
used  as  such.  To  be  the  best  of  m>  know  ledge,  the  com- 
plete synonynn  of  O.  filosus  is  as  follows: 

Octopus  filosus  Howell,  1868 

Octopus  filosa  Howell,  1868:240. 

Octopus  filosus,  Robson,  1929:146.— Pickford.  194.5:709;  1946: 
422.— Voss,  1962:2.— Burgess,  1966:770.— Roper  et  al. 
1984:201.— Toll,  1988:209. 

Octopus  {Octopus)  rugosus  (=  Octopus  vulgaris  Lamarck. 
1798),  Robson,  1929  {pars,  only  specimen  B,M.190;3.9.17,9., 
fide  Pickford.  1946424). 

Octopus  hummclincki  Adam,  19:36:1;  1937:2.5,  Pickford.  1945: 
745;  1946:414;  1950:1:39.— Voss,  1949:3;  1953:7.'3;  1956: 
279;  1962:2;  1968:657;  1975:351;  1976:77 —Rees,  1950: 
107.— Burgess,  1966:762.— Voss  and  Solis,  1966:624  —Pa- 
lacio,  1977:101.— Cairns,  1976:2.58 —Wodinsky,  1977: 
947— Nesis,  1982:302,— Aroclia-Pietri,  1983:37,— Roper 
et  al,  1984:201 —Calow,  1987:360,— Mangold,  1987: 
182.— Hanlon.  1988:252 —Toll,  i988:209  — \'ecchione  et 
al,  1989:20, 

Octopus  vulgaris.  Pickford.  1945708  [pars,  non  O.  vulgaris 
Lamarck,  1798). 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

George  Davis  and  Mary  Garback,  Academy  of  Natural 
Sciences  of  Philadelphia,  loaned  the  holotype  of  Octopus 
filosus.  Robert  Moolenbeck,  Zoologisch  Museum-lini- 
versiteit  Van  Amsterdam,  loaned  the  syntypes  of  O.  Inim- 
melincki.  Michael  Sweene\,  Division  of  Mollusks,  Na- 
tional Museum  of  Natural  History,  conducted  a  computer 
literature  search  that  aided  in  the  construction  of  the 
synonymy.  Susan  Armentrout,  Dupont  Library,  The  Llni- 
versity  of  the  South,  assisted  in  the  acquisition  of  liter- 


ature records.  Their  contributions  are  gratefully  ac- 
knowledged. This  contribution  was  supported  by  a  grant 
from  the  National  Science  Foundation  (BSR  8508439) 
and  general  support  for  research  from  the  University  of 
the  South. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

.Arocha-Pietra  F  1983,  Cephalopodos  del  genero  Octopus 
en  el  area  insular  del  oriente  de  X'enezuela  Master's  Thesis, 
L  iiiversidad  de  Oriente.  (Aunana,  Wnezuela.  135  p. 

.\dam,  W.  1936.  Notes  sur  les  cephalopods.  \4. — Une  nou- 
velle  espece  d'Octopus  (Octopus  humnteliucki  sp.  nov.) 
des  les  hides  occidentales  Neerlandaises,  Bulletin  du  Musee 
ro\al  d  Histoire  naturelle  de  Belgique  12(40):  1-3, 

■\dam,  W  1937  Ceplialopodes  des  lies  Bonaire  et  Curacao. 
Capita  Zoologica  8:1-29 

Burgess,  L.  A,  1966,  \  stud\  of  the  morphology  and  biniogv 
of  Octopus  hummclincki  .\dam,  19:36  (Mollusca:  Cepha- 
lopoda). Bulletin  of  Marine  Science  16(4):762-813- 

Cairns,  S.  D  1976.  Clephalopods  collected  in  the  Straits  of 
Florida  bv  the  R/V  Gerila.  15ulletin  of  Marine  Science 
26(2):233-272. 

tialow  ,  P,  1987,  Fact  and  theory — an  overview.  In:  Bovle,  P, 
R,  (ed, ),  Cephalopod  life  c\cles,  volume  IP  comparative 
reviews.  Academic  Press,  London,  p,  ■351-;365. 

llanlun.  l\  T  1988.  Behavioral  and  body  patterning  char- 
acters useful  in  ta,\ononi\  anil  field  itlentificati(}n  of  cepli- 
ak)pods,  Malacologia  29(  f  ):247-264. 

Howell,  S,  B,  1868,  Descriptions  of  two  new  species  of  ceph- 
alopods. American  Journal  of  Conchologv  3:239-24  i, 

ICZN,  1985.  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomenclature, 
3rd  ed.  University  of  California  Press,  338  p. 

Mangold,  K.  1987.  Reproduction. /n:  Boyle,  P.  R.  (ed.).  Ceph- 
alopod life  cycles,  volume  II:  comparative  reviews  .-Vca- 
demic  Press,  London,  p.  157-200, 

Nesis,  K,  .N,  1982,  Brief  svnopsis  of  certain  cephalopod  mol- 
lusks of  the  world's  oceans  (in  Russian),  L',S,S,R,,  358  p, 

Palacio.  F,  J,  1977,  .\  stud\  of  the  coastal  cephalopods  from 
Brazil  with  a  review  of  Brazilian  zoogeography.  Doctoral 
Dissertation,  University  of  Miami,  Florida.  311  p 

Pickford,  G.  E.  1945.  Le  poulpe  Americain:  a  study  of  the 
littoral  Octopoda  of  the  western  Atlantic.  Transactions  of 
the  Connecticut  .Acadenu  of  .\rts  and  Sciences  36:701- 
811, 

Pickford,  G,  E,  1946.  .\  review  of  the  littoral  Octopoda  from 
the  Central  and  Western  Atlantic  stations  in  the  collections 
of  the  British  Museum.  .-Vnnals  and  Magazine  of  Natural 
History,  Ser.  11,  Vol,  13:412-429, 

Pickford,  G.  E.  1950  Tlie  Octopoda  of  the  Oxford  L'niversity 
Cayman  Expedition.  Proceedings  of  the  Malacological  So- 
cieU  of  London  28(4,5):139-144. 

Rees,  W  J  19.50.  Notes  on  the  cephalopods  from  the  Carib- 
bean. Proceedings  of  the  Malacological  Society  of  London 
28(2,3):107-114, 

Robson,  G,  C,  1929,  ,A  Monograph  of  the  Octopoda,  The 
Octopodinae,  British  Museum  (.Natural  Hislorv),  London, 
236  p. 

Roper,  C,  F,  E.,  M,  J,  Sweeney,  and  C  E,  Nauen,  1984. 
Cephalopods  of  the  world.  Food  and  .Agriculture  Orga- 
nization (F.\0)  Species  Catalogue  Vol.  3,277  p.  FAO  Rome. 

Toll,  R,  B.  1988.  The  use  of  arm  sucker  number  in  octopodid 
systematics  (Cephalopoda:  Octopoda).  .American  Mala- 
cological Bulletin  6(2):207-21I. 

\  ecchione,  M.,  C.   F    E    Roper,  and  M    J    Sweeney.     1989 


Page  28 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  1 


Marine  flora  and  fauna  of  the  eastern  United  States.  Mol- 
lusca:  Ck'phalopoda.  .\OA.-\  Teclinieal  Report  NMFS  73, 
22  p. 

Voss,  G.  L.  19-19.  Notes  on  a  specimen  of  Oclopu.s  humnic- 
lincki  .Vdani  from  the  Florida  Keys.  Revista  de  la  Soeiedad 
Malacologica  Carlos  de  la  Torre  7{l):3-5. 

\'oss,  G.  L.  1953.  Observations  on  a  living  specimen  of  Oc- 
topus hummelincki  Adam.  Nautilus  66:73-76. 

\'oss,  G.  L.  1956.  A  checklist  of  the  cephalopods  of  Florida. 
Quarterly  Journal  of  the  Florida  .Xcademy  of  Science  19: 
27-1-2S2.' 

Voss,  G.  L.  1962.  List  of  the  types  and  species  of  cephalopods 
in  the  collections  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of 
Philadelphia.  Notulae  Naturae  No.  356,  7  p. 

X'oss,  G.  L.     1968.    Oclopods  from  the  R/V  Pillsbury  south- 


western C^aribbean  cruise,  1966,  with  a  description  of  a 
new  species.  Octopus  zonatus.  Bulletin  of  Marine  Science 
18:6-4.5-659. 

Voss,  G.  L.  1975.  Etuixoctupm,  pillslmnjac.  nt-w  species,  (^1'0\- 
lusca;  Ck'phalopoda)  from  the  southern  (Caribbean  and  Sur- 
inam. Bulletin  ol  Marine  Science  25(,3);346-.352. 

\'oss,  G.  L.  1976.  Seashore  life  of  Florida  and  the  Caribbean. 
Seemann  Publishing,  Inc.,  Miami,  168  p. 

\oss,  G.  L.  and  M.  Solis.  1966.  Octopus  maya,  a  new  species 
from  the  Bay  of  Campeche,  Mexico.  Bulletin  of  Marine 
Science  16(3);615-625. 

W'odinsk),  J.  1977.  Hormonal  inhibition  ot  feeding  and  death 
in  Octopus:  control  by  optic  gland  secretion.  Science  198: 
948-951. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(1  ):29-32,  1990 


Page  29 


Coelatura  Conrad,  1853,  Caelatiira  Conrad,  1865  and 
Coelatura  Pfeiffer,  1877  (Mollusca): 
A  Tale  of  Two  Diphthongs 


Gary  Rosenberg 
Arthur  E.  Bogan 
Earle  E.  Spanier 

Acaderii)  of  Natural  Sciences 
19th  and  the  Parkway 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103,  L'SA 


ABSTRACT 

Coelatura  Conrad,  1853  is  the  valid  name  for  the  genus  of 
unionid  bivalves  emended  to  Caclatura  by  Simpson  (1900). 
The  family-group  name  Caelaturinae  Model!,  1942  must  be 
corrected  to  Coelaturinae  Modell.  Caclatura  Conrad,  1865  is 
the  valid  name  for  the  genus  of  barleeid  gastropods  renamed 
Actaeonema  Conrad,  1865.  Coelatura  Pfeiffer,  1877,  Coela- 
tura von  Martens,  1880,  Caelatura  Germain,  1921  and  Ario- 
caelatura  Germain,  1921  are  objective  synonyms  of  Plegma 
Gude,  191 1,  a  genus  of  heli.xarionid  gastropods.  Confusion  among 
these  names  has  resulted  from  the  difficulty  in  distinguishing 
between  the  "ae  and  "oe  diphthongs  when  they  are  printed 
as  ligatures.  The  ligature  for  "ae"  in  some  typefaces  is  used  as 
an  "oe'  in  others.  The  only  way  to  be  sure  of  an  author's 
intentions  is  to  compare  words  of  known  spelling. 

Key  words:  Barleeidae,  Actaeonema.  Caclatura:  diphthongs; 
Helixarionidae,  Plegma:  L'nionidae.  Coelatura. 


INTRODUCTION 

During  routine  curation  of  the  moUusk  collection  at  the 
Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia,  we  came 
across  a  nomenclatural  problem  in  trying  to  put  speci- 
mens identified  as  Caelatura  in  their  proper  position  in 
the  systematic  collection.  The  name  Caclatura  was  in 
use  in  both  the  Bivalvia  and  the  Gastropoda,  and  sub- 
sequent research  in  the  literature  revealed  further  prob- 
lems with  misspellings  and  emendations  affecting  taxa 
in  three  families.  Most  of  these  complications  stem  from 
the  difficulty  of  distinguishing  the  "ae  '  and  "oe  "  diph- 
thongs when  they  are  printed  as  ligatures,  as  they  were 
in  the  texts  in  which  the  names  considered  here  were 
introduced.  We  have  found  that  the  ligature  for  "ae  '  in 
some  typefaces  is  used  as  an  "oe  "  in  others  and  that  the 
only  way  to  be  sure  of  an  author's  intentions  is  to  compare 
words  of  known  spelling.  To  sort  out  the  confusion  caused 
by  these  diphthongs  and  their  ligatures,  we  rely  on  the 
provisions  of  the  Internatiotial  Code  of  Zoological  No- 
menclature (ICZN,  1985).  We  note  at  the  outset  that  ae 


and  DC  are  regarded  as  interchangeable  for  the  purposes 
of  homonymy  in  species-group  names  (ICZN  Article  58), 
but  not  in  genus-group  names,  in  which  a  single  letter 
difterence  is  sufficient  to  avoid  homonymy  (Article  56b). 
We  also  make  use  of  the  ICZN's  provisions  for  deter- 
mining if  subsequent  spellings  are  misspellings  or  emen- 
dations, and  for  determining  if  emendations  are  justified 
or  unjustified. 


TAXONOMY 

Coelatura  Conrad  (Bivalvia:  Unionidae) 

In  1853,  Conrad  named  the  genus  Coelatura,  with  the 
single  included  species  Unio  aegyptiacus  Cailliaud, 
1827.  He  used  the  spelling  Coelatura  twice  (p.  267,  268), 
and  the  distinction  between  the  "oe"  and  "ae"  ligatures 
is  clear  in  the  text.  Simpson  (1900)  used  Conrad's  genus 
for  a  group  of  African  unionid  bivalves,  but  spelled  it 
"Caelatura,"  (p.  820,  S62  and  in  the  index,  p.  1004).  The 
instance  on  page  862  looks  like  it  is  spelled  with  an  "oe," 
because  there  is  little  difference  between  the  ae  and  oe 
ligatures  in  the  italic  typeface  in  Simpson's  work.  In- 
spection of  words  such  as  "aegyptiacus"  (p.  821),  "lae- 
vigatas" (p.  600)  and  "coctcstis"  (p.  905)  shows  that  he 
used  the  spelling  "Caclatura"  throughout.  This  consis- 
tent use  qualifies  as  an  intentional  emendation  (ICZN 
Article  33b(i)).  As  there  is  no  evidence  in  Conrad's  text 
that  Coelatura  is  an  original  misspelling,  the  emendation 
is  unjustified  and  introduces  the  name  Caelatura  Simp- 
son, 1900,  which  is  a  junior  objective  synonym  of  Coe- 
latura Conrad,  1853  (Article  33b(iii)),  and  is  also  a  junior 
homony  m  of  Caclatura  Conrad,  1865  (Gastropoda).  Most 
authors  after  Simpson  incorrectly  used  the  name  Cae- 
latura, rather  than  Coelatura,  exceptions  being  Yokes 
(1980:96)  and  Vaught  (1989:124).  Modell  (1942:190)  in- 
troduced the  subfamilial  name  Caelaturinae  based  on 
the  emended  spelling  of  Coelatura  and  Starobogatov 
(1970:64)  used  the  tribal  name  Caelaturini.  These  must 


Page  30 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No    1 


be  corrected  to  Coeiaturinae  Model),  1942  and  Coela- 
turini  Modell,  1942  (Article  35d(ii)). 

There  is  also  a  question  as  to  the  correct  spelling  of 
the  name  of  the  type  species  of  Coelatiira  (Conrad.  Cail- 
liaud  (1823-1827)  rendered  it  Vnio  aegyptiacu.s  in  the 
text  (p.  263),  but  Vnio  egyptiacus  in  the  plate  caption 
(pi.  61,  fig.  5-6).  Most  authors  have  used  the  spelling 
found  in  the  text,  which  was  published  in  1827,  but  the 
plate  might  have  been  published  before  then  as  the  atlas 
v\as  issued  in  parts  between  1823  and  1827  (Sherborn  & 
Woodward,  1901:334).  From  the  available  evidence,  we 
cannot  prove  that  the  plates  were  issued  before  the  text, 
so  we  retain  the  spelling  "aegyptiacus." 

Caelatura  Conr.ad  (Gastropoda:  Barleeidae) 

In  1865,  Conrad  published  a  catalogue  of  Eocene  and 
Oligocene  shells  of  the  United  States,  in  which  he  intro- 
duced the  name  Caelatura  (Conrad,  1865a).  He  included 
the  species  Pasithea  sulcata  Lea,  1833  and  P.  striata 
Lea,  1833  in  Caelatura.  w  hich  he  placed  in  the  Terebri- 
dae  on  page  28.  However,  he  also  listed  Caelatura  in  the 
.Acteonidae  on  page  35,  including  only  Pasithea  striata. 
Tr\on  (1865),  the  editor  of  Conrad's  paper,  stated  that 
Caelatura  striata  and  sulcata  both  should  have  appeared 
on  page  35,  not  on  page  28.  Later  in  the  year,  Conrad 
renamed  Caelatura  as  Actaeonerna  (1865b:  147),  citing 
page  35  and  not  page  28  of  his  earlier  work,  and  illus- 
trating Actaeonerna  striata  (pi.  11,  fig.  2).  He  did  not 
state  why  he  replaced  the  name.  One  might  assume  that 
he  replaced  Caelatura  because  of  its  similarity  to  the 
prior  Coelatura.  Iiut  Ponder  (1983)  argued  that  Conrad 
meant  to  restrict  the  name  Caelatura  to  Pasithea  sulcata 
on  page  28  and  to  provide  a  new  genus  for  Pasithea 
striata  on  page  35.  This  interpretation  is  demonstrably 
incorrect  because  of  Tryon's  editorial  correction  and  be- 
cause Cionrad  later  (1866:9)  included  both  sulcata  and 
striata  in  Actaeonerna  and  no  longer  used  Caelatura. 
Thus,  both  Pasithea  sulcata  and  P.  striata  Lea,  1833  are 
originally  included  species  in  Caelatura.  and  Aetaeone- 
rtia  must  be  regarded  as  a  replacement  name  for  it  and 
therefore  an  objective  synonym. 

There  is  also  confusion  regarding  the  type  species  for 
Caelatura  Conrad,  1865.  We  note  that  because  Caela- 
tura and  Actaeonerna  are  objective  synonyms,  the  first 
valid  type  designation  for  either  is  a  type  designation 
for  both  (Article  67h).  Some  authors  (Tryon,  1887:53; 
Fischer,  1885:779)  have  given  Pasithea  striata  as  an  ex- 
ample of  Actaeonerna,  which  does  not  qualify  as  a  type 
designation.  It  should  be  noted  that  Palmer  (1937:154) 
demonstrated  that  Conrad  (1865b)  misidentified  Pasi- 
thea striata  Lea;  the  species  he  figured  (pi.  11,  fig.  2)  is 
Tuba  cancellata  Lea,  a  mathildid.  Palmer  (1937:68)  sug- 
Ki'sled  that  P.  striata  Lea  is  ba.sed  on  a  turritellid  pro- 
tucoiuh  Inspection  of  the  type  lot  (ANSP  5502)  confirms 
ih:ii  tin-  /'.  striata  is  not  a  barleeid  or  a  mathildid,  but 
its  aftinitie.";  with  turritellids  are  uncertain,  as  indicated 
h\  !'' ,1 II if  r  i  ]  985: 1 05).  Because  Conrad  (1865a)  cited  only 
Lea  !  tvi-  Iv^MiTs  of  P.  striata  and  P.  sulcata,  his  later 


(1865b)  misidentification  of  Pasithea  striata  has  no  bear- 
ing on  the  type  species  question,  a  point  not  realized  b\ 
later  authors.  Palmer  (1937:156)  and  Moore  (1962:98) 
treated  Actaeonerna  striata  as  a  species  described  by 
Conrad,  but  this  is  incorrect,  as  Conrad  was  merely  in- 
troducing a  new  combination.  Cossmann  (1893:29)  stated 
of  Actaeonerna  striata  (Lea): 

II  y  a  lieu  de  remarquer  que  ce  nest  pas  cette  espece  qui 
est  le  veritable  t\  pe  du  genre  .Actaeonerna.  mais  Pyramis 
striata.  C>)nrad,  c  est  a  dire  Pasithea  .sulcata  ou  I  espece 
precedeiite  [.Actaeonerna  sulcatum  (Lea)],  de  sorte  que 
Toil  pent  desormais  fi.xer,  d  uue  niariiere  beaucoup  plus 
certaine,  les  caracteres  de  ce  genre. 

Cossmann  thus  equated  Conrad's  misidentification  of 
Pasithea  striata  with  P.  sulcata  Lea  (Conrad  had  syn- 
onymized  them  as  Pyramis  striata  in  1834),  but  this  is 
incorrect  as  shown  by  Palmer  (1937).  Because  Coss- 
mann s  statement  is  ambiguous,  it  does  not  qualify  as  a 
type  designation  (ICZN  Article  67c(3)).  Cossmann  later 
(1921:49)  explicitly  cited  Pasithea  sulcata  Lea  as  the  type 
species  of  Actaeonerna:  this  is  the  first  valid  t\pe  des- 
ignation that  we  have  found.  Ponder  (1983:244)  recog- 
nized P.  sulcata  as  the  type  species  of  Caelatura,  which 
he  placed  in  the  Barleeidae,  but  incorrectly  considered 
P.  striata  to  be  the  type  of  Actaeonerna. 


CoEL.\TVRA  PfEIFFER  (GASTROPODA: 

Hellxarionidae) 

Pfeiffer  (1877:8)  also  named  a  Coelatura.  type  species, 
by  monotypy,  "//.  coelatura  Fer."[=  Helix  (Helicogena) 
coelatura  Ferussac,  1821],  a  Mascarene  land  snail.  Von 
Martens  (1880:192)  used  Coelatura  as  a  subgenus  of 
Pachxjstyla  without  attributing  authorship  to  the  name, 
but  he  included  "Pachystyla  caelatura  Ferussac  (Helix 
Helicogena),  among  other  species,  so  it  appears  at  first 
that  he  was  referring  to  Pfeiffer  s  genus.  However,  von 
Martens  (1881:74)  cited  himself  as  having  introduced 
Coelatura  in  ISSO.  Therefore,  we  select  Pachystyla  cae- 
latura (Ferussac)  [=  Helix  (Helicogena )  coelatura  Ferus- 
sac, 1821],  by  reason  of  virtual  tautonomy.  as  t\'pe  species 
of  Coelatura  von  Martens,  1880,  making  it  an  objective 
synonym  of  Coelatura  Pfeiffer,  1877.  Coelatura  Pfeiffer 
non  Conrad  was  replaced  b\  Plegnia  Gude,  1911  and  is 
now  placed  in  the  Helixarionidae.  (Helicarionidae  is  a 
misspelling  based  on  the  unjustified  emendation  of  He- 
lixarion  Ferussac,  1821  to  Helicarion  b\  Ferussac  (1822) 
(Kennard,  1942).) 

Some  authors  (e.g..  Zilch,  1959:308)  consider  Pfeiffer's 
Coelatura  to  have  been  emended  to  "Caelatura"  by 
Fi.scher.  However,  Fischer  spelled  Coelatura  correctly 
in  the  text  (1883:461);  it  is  misspelled  in  the  index  (1887: 
1339),  as  noted  by  Schuize  et  al.  (1927:482),  but  this 
cannot  be  construed  as  an  emendation,  and  has  no  no- 
menclatural  standing.  The  first  author  to  have  emended 
Pfeiffer's  Coelatura  to  Caelatura  appears  to  be  Germain 
(1921:103),  apparently  because  he  thought  that  the  cor- 


G.  Rosenberg  et  al.,  1990 


Page  31 


rect  spelling  of  the  type  species  was  Helix  caelatura,  not 
Helix  coelatura  as  given  by  Pfeiffer  (1877:192).  How- 
ever, this  is  an  unjustified  emendation  because  Pfeiffer's 
Coelatura  cannot  be  considered  an  incorrect  original 
spelling  based  on  evidence  in  Pfeiffer's  text  (ICZN  Article 
32c(ii)).  Further  complicating  matters,  Germain  (1921: 
461),  who  was  unaware  of  Gude's  Plegrna,  introduced 
Ariocaelatitra  as  a  replacement  for  Pfeiffer's  name  when 
he  realized  that  it  was  preoccupied.  Thiele  (1931:615) 
and  Viader  (1937:79)  considered  Ariocaelatura  and 
Plegma  to  be  distinct  genera  although  they  are  objective 
synonyms.  Wenz  (1947)  introduced  the  name  Psciido- 
caelatura  for  Ariocaelatura  "Thiele"  non  Germain,  with 
type  species  Pachystyla  scalpta  (von  Martens,  1877). 
Wenz  s  name  is  preoccupied  by  Pseudocaclatura  Ger- 
main, 1921  and  was  replaced  by  Dancea  Zilch,  1960. 

There  has  been  confusion  as  to  the  correct  spelling  of 
the  specific  name  of  Helix  (Helicogena)  coelatura  be- 
cause of  inconsistencies  in  Ferussac's  work  (1819-1832). 
The  species  was  illustrated  on  plate  28  (fig.  3,  4),  the 
caption  of  which  was  published  on  6  April  1821.  A  second 
reference  to  the  plate  appeared  later  that  year  in  Ferus- 
sac  1821a  (p.  30  of  the  quarto  edition,  p.  34  of  the  folio), 
which  was  published  26  Ma\  1821  (dates  from  Kennard, 
1942:109,  1943:122).  In  the  plate  caption,  the  specific 
name  is  spelled  "coelatura,"  but  from  inspection  of  other 
words  in  the  captions  in  the  same  italic  t\  peface,  it  is 
apparent  that  the  typesetter  often  substituted  ligatures, 
using  oe  for  ae.  For  example,  acavae  (pi.  33,  35),  acavoe 
(pi.  25,  30,  32,  34,  36);  columellatae  (pi.  11,  15,  17), 
colurriellatoe  (pi.  15,  17,  25,  32);  and  perforatoe  for  per- 
foratae  throughout.  The  vernacular  descriptor  that  Fer- 
ussac  gave  this  species  in  the  caption  is  "ciselee."  mean- 
ing carved  or  sculpted,  corresponding  in  meaning  to  the 
Latin  caelatura.  However,  coel-  is  sometimes  used  as  an 
alternate  spelling  for  the  Latin  root  cael-,  so  it  cannot 
be  proven  from  the  evidence  of  the  original  publication 
that  "coelatura"  is  a  misspelling.  In  1821a  (p.  30)  and 
1827  (p.  302)  Ferussac  used  the  spelling  "caelatura."  but 
these  do  not  qualify  as  emendations  as  the  spelling  ap- 
pears only  once  in  each  work.  The  spelling  "caelatura" 
is  repeated  four  times  by  Deshayes  in  Ferussac  and  De- 
shayes  (1850:162),  which  qualifies  as  an  emendation. 
(Deshayes  continued  Ferussac's  work  after  the  latter  s 
death  in  1836).  In  the  complete  set  of  plate  captions  for 
the  work  (Ferussac  and  Deshayes  (1851  in  1819-1851)) 
the  spelling  "coelatura"  recurs,  presumabK'  copied  from 
the  original  plate  captions.  Both  spellings  have  been  used 
with  about  equal  frequency  in  the  literature,  as  shown 
in  the  synonymy  by  Germain  (1921:103).  The  two  most 
recent  references  to  the  species  that  we  have  found  (Zilch, 
1959:308;  Groh  and  Griffiths,  1987:39)  use  the  spelling 
"coelatura."  Because  "coelatura"  has  priority,  cannot  be 
proven  to  be  an  original  misspelling,  and  does  not  threat- 
en nomenclatural  stability.  Helix  (Helicogena)  coelatura 
Ferussac,  1821  is  the  correct  citation  for  the  t\pe  species 
of  Plegma.  Helix  caelatura  Deshayes  in  Ferussac  and 
Deshayes,  1850  is  an  unjustified  emendation  and  an  ob- 
jective synonym  of  it. 


Summary 

We  have  established  the  status  of  the  following  names; 
valid  names  are  listed  first  followed  by  objective  syn- 
onyms: 

Coelatura  Conrad.  1853  (Bivalvia:  Uiiionidae)  [type  species, 
by  moiiotypy,  Unio  aegyptiacus  C^ailliaud,  1827] 
+  Caelatura  Simpson,  1900 
Caelatura  Conrad,  186.5a  (Ga.stropoda:  Barleeidae)[t>pe species, 
b\  subsequent  designation  of  Cossmann  (1921:49),  Pasi- 
thca  sulcata  Lea,  1833] 

+  Actaconcma  Conrad.  1865b 
/'/r^'/iuj  Glide,  1911  (Gastropoda;  Helixarionidae)  [type  species, 
b\  monot>py,  "H.  coelatura  Fer.  "  =  Helix  (Helicogena) 
coelatura  Ferussac,  1821] 
-I-  Coelatura  Pfeiffer,  1877 
+  Coelatura  von  Martens,  1880 
-I-  Caelatura  Germain,  1921 
-I-  Ariocaelatura  Germain,  1921 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  Audi  Garback  for  bringing  this  problem  to 
our  attention.  Kenneth  C.  Emberton  and  two  anonymous 
reviewers  provided  helpful  comments,  Robert  Robertson 
aided  with  translations,  and  Kenneth  J.  Boss  and  P.  K. 
Tubbs  advised  on  interpretation  of  the  ICZN.  This  work 
was  made  possible  b\  NSF  Grant  BSR-8911074  for  col- 
lection support  in  the  ANSP  malacology  department. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Cailliaud,  F  1823-1827.  Voyage  a  Meroeet  au  Fleine  Blanc, 
vol.  4,  415  pp.,  1  pi  ,  atlas  vol.  2,  75  pi 

Conrad,  T.  A.  1834.  Fossil  shells  of  the  Lower  Tertiar\  or 
Eocene  period.  In:  Morton,  S.  G.  Synopsis  of  the  organic 
remains  of  the  Cretaceous  Group  of  the  United  States  Key 
&  Biddle,  Philadelphia,  p.  3-8,  appendix 

Conrad,  T,  .\.  1853.  A  synopsis  of  the  family  of  naiades  of 
North  America,  with  notes,  and  a  table  of  some  of  the 
genera  and  sub-genera  of  the  family,  according  to  their 
geographical  distribution,  and  descriptions  of  genera  and 
sub-genera.  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sci- 
ences of  Philadelphia  6:243-269. 

Conrad,  T,  A.  1865a.  Catalogue  of  the  Eocene  and  Oligocene 
Testacea  of  the  United  States,  American  Journal  of  Con- 
chology  1:1-35  [published  25  February  1865]. 

Conrad,  T.  A.  1865b  Descriptions  of  new  Eocene  shells  of 
the  United  States.  American  Journal  of  Conchology  1:142- 
149,  pf  10-11  [published  15  April  1865]. 

Conrad,  T.  A.  1866.  Check  list  of  the  invertebrate  fossils  of 
North  America.  Eocene  and  Oligocene.  Smithsonian  Mis- 
cellaneous Collections  200,  iv  -(-  41  p 

Cossmann.  M.  1893.  Notes  complementaires  sur  la  faune 
Eocenique  de  r.\labania.  Annales  de  Geologic  et  de  Pa- 
leontologie  12:1-51,  pi.  1-2. 

Cossmann,  M.  1921.  Essais  de  paleoconchologie  comparee, 
vol.  12.  Paris,  349  p.  pi,  a-d,  1-6. 

Ferussac,  A.  E.  1819-1832.  Histoire  naturelle  generale  et 
particuliere  des  mollusques  terrestres  et  fluviatiles.  Atlas, 
162  pi.  [See  Kennard  (1942)  for  dates  of  plates  and  ac- 
companying text.] 


Page  32 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  1 


Ferussac,  A.  E.  1821a.  Tableau  systematique  de  la  famille 
des  lima9on.s,  cochleae.  Paris.  [Quarto edition,  111  p.;  folio 
114  p.  See  Kennard  (1942)  for  dates  of  publication  of 
signatures.) 

Ferussac,  .'\.  E,  1827.  C^atalogue  des  especes  de  mollusques 
terrestres  et  fluviatiles,  recueillies  par  M  Rang,  offic.  de 
la  marine  roy.,  dans  un  voyage  aux  grandes  hides.  Bulletin 
des  Sciences  Naturelles  et  de  Geologic  10:298-307,  408- 
413. 

Ferussac.  A.  E.  and  Desliayes,  G.  P.  1819-1851.  Histoire 
naturelle  generate  et  particuliere  des  mollusques  terrestres 
et  fluviatiles,  2  vols.  [For  collation  see  Kennard  (1942).] 

Fischer,  P.  1880-1887.  Manuel  de  concliyliologie  et  de  pa- 
leontologieconclnliologique.  Librairie  F.  Savy,  Paris,  x.xiv 
+  1369  p  .  23  pi  ,  frontispiece. 

Germain,  L.  1921.  Faune  malacologique  terrestreet  fluviatile 
des  lies  Ma.scareignes.  Gaultier  et  Thebert,  Angers,  iv  + 
495  p.,  13  pi. 

Groh,  K.  and  O.  Griffiths.  1987.  Africa  and  Adjacent  Islands. 
In:  Parkinson,  B.,  J.  Hemmen,  and  K  Groh.  Tropical  land- 
shells  of  the  world.  Crista  Henuiien,  Weisbaden,  Federal 
Republic  of  Germany,  p.  30-39. 

Gude,  G.  K.  1911.  Further  note  on  preoccupied  molluscan 
generic  names  and  a  proposed  new  genus  of  the  family 
Helicidae.  Proceedings  of  the  Malacological  Society  of 
London  9:361-362. 

International  Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature.  1985. 
International  code  of  zoological  nomenclature,  third  edi- 
tion, adopted  by  the  XX  General  .Assembly  of  the  Inter- 
national L'nion  of  Biological  Sciences.  London,  x\  +  338  p. 

Kennard,  A.  S.  1942.  The  llUtoire  and  Prodrome  of  Ferussac. 
Proceedings  of  the  Malacological  Societv  of  London  25: 
12-17,  105-118. 

Kennard,  A.  S.  1943.  Notes  on  the  nomenclature  of  the  Mas- 
carene  non-marine  Mollusca.  Mauritius  Institute  Bulletin 
2:115-136. 

Lea,  1,  1833  Contributions  to  (Jeology.  Carey,  Lea  and  Blan- 
chard,  Philadelphia,  227  p.,  6  pi. 

Modell,  II.  1942.  Das  natiirliche  System  de  Najaden.  Archiv 
fiir  Molluskenkunde  74:161-191. 

Moore,  E.  J.  1962.  Conrad  s  Onozoic  fossil  marine  mollusk 
type  specimens  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of 
Philadelphia,  Proceedings  of  tfie  Academy  of  Natural  Sci- 
ences of  Philadelphia  114:23-120 

Palmer,  K.  \\  W.  1937.  The  Claibornian  Scapliopoda,  Gas- 
tropoda and  dibranchiate  (Cephalopoda  of  the  southern 
United  States.  Part  I.  Bulletins  of  American  Paleontologv 
7(32):  1-548. 

Pfeiffer,  L.  1877.  Leber  die  systematische  Anordiiung  der 
Helicaceen.  Malakozoologische  Blatter  24:1-14,  75-84. 

Ponder,  W.  F.    1983.    Review  of  the  genera  of  the  Barleeidae 


(Mollusca:  Gastropoda:  Rissoacea).  Records  of  the  .Austra- 
lian Museum  35:231-281. 

Ponder,  VV.  F.  1985  (1984).  .K  re\iew  of  the  genera  of  the 
Kissoidae  (Mollusca:  Mesogastropoda:  Rissoacea).  Records 
of  the  Australian  Museum,  Supplement  4,  221  p. 

Schulze,  F.  E.,  W.  Kiikenthal,  and  K.  Heider,  1927,  \omen- 
clator  animalium  generum  et  subgenerum  2(6):477-636. 
Preussischen  Akademie  der  Wissenschaften,  Berlin. 

Sherborn,  C.  D.  and  B.  B.  Woodward.  1901.  Dates  of  pub- 
lication of  the  zoological  and  botanical  portions  of  some 
F'rench  vovages. — Part  II.  .Annals  and  Magazine  of  Natural 
History  (7')8:333-336. 

Simpson,  C,  T.  1900.  Synopsis  of  the  naiades,  or  pearK  fresh- 
water mussels.  Proceedings  of  the  United  States  National 
Museum  22:501-1044,  pi.  18. 

Starobogatov,  Y.  I.  1970  Fauna  mollyuskov  i  zoogeografi- 
cheskoe  raionirovanie  kontinental  nykh  vodoemov  zem- 
nogo  shara.  Akademiya  Nauk  SSSR,  Zoologicheskii  Insti- 
tut,  Leningrad,  372  p, 

Tliiele,  J  1931,  Haiidbuch  der  s>stematischen  Weichtier- 
kunde.  Part  2.  Gustav  Fischer,  Jena,  p.  377-778. 

Tryon,  G.  W.  1865.  Correctionsandadditions  to  Mr.  Conrad's 
catalogue  of  Eocene  Mollusca,  published  in  the  1st  number 
of  this  journal.  .American  Journal  ol  Concholog)  1:191- 
192.  [Published  1  October  1865] 

Tryon,  G.  W.  1887.  [lanthinidae,  Trichotropidae.Scalariidae.] 
Manual  of  Conchology  9:33-111,  pi.  7-18. 

X'aught,  K.  C.  1989.  .\  classification  of  the  living  Mollusca. 
American  Malacologists,  Melbourne,  Florida,  xii  +  195  p. 

V'iader,  R.  1937.  Revised  catalogue  of  the  testaceous  Mollusca 
of  Mauritius  and  its  dependencies  Mauritius  Institute  Bul- 
letin l(2):xiv  -I-  111  p.,  1  map. 

Yokes,  H.  E.  1980.  Genera  of  the  BivaKia:  a  systematic  and 
bibliographic  catalogue  (revised  and  updated).  Paleonto- 
logical  Research  Institute,  Ithaca,  New  York,  xxvii  +  307  p. 

von  Martens,  E.  1877.  Ubersicht  der  wahrend  der  Reise  um 
die  Erde  in  den  Jahren  1874-1876  auf  S.  M.  Schiff  Gazelle 
gesammelten  Land-  und  Siisswasser-Mollusken.  Monats- 
bericht  der  Koniglichen  .Akademie  der  Wissenschaften  zu 
Berlin,  p.  261-291,  pi.  1-2. 

von  Martens,  E  1880  Mollusken  In.  Mobius,  K.,  F.  Richters, 
and  E.  v  Martens.  Beitrage  zur  Meeresfauna  der  Insel 
Mauritius  und  der  Seychellen.  Gutmann'schen  Buchhan- 
dlung,  Berlin,  p.  181-336,  pi.  19-22. 

\()n  Martens,  E.  1881.  Mollusca.  Zoological  Record  17:1-104 
(for  1880). 

VVenz,  W.  1947.  Zur  Taxonoinie  tier  Euth\  neiua,  .Archi\  fiir 
Molluskenkunde  76:36. 

Zilch,  .A.  1959-1960.  Gastropoda:  Eutlnneura  In:  Schinde- 
wolf,  O.  H.  (ed).  Handbuch  der  Palaozoologie,  vol.  6(2). 
Gebriider  Borntraeger,  Berlin,  p.  i-xii,  1-834. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(1):33,  1990 


Page  33 


Ediiardiis  Pilsbry,  1930,  a  Subgenus  of 

Praticolella  Martens,  1892 

(Gastropoda:  Stylommatophora:  Polygyridae) 


Kenneth  C.  Emberton 
Leonard  Richardson 

Department  iit  Malacology 
Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
19th  &  the  Park\va\ 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103 


ABSTRACT 

The  purpose  of  this  note  is  to  correct  a  iiomenclatural  error 
that  occurs  in  the  literature. 

Pilsbry  (1930:315)  erected  Eduardus  as  a  section  of  the  sub- 
genus Pohjgyra  {Daedalochila)  Beck,  1837,  with  P.  marten- 
siana  Pilsbr>',  1907,  as  the  type  and  onl\  member  Later,  in  a 
brief  note,  Pilsbry  (1937)  transferred  P.  maricnsiana  to  the 
genus  Praticolella  Martens,  1892,  based  on  the  genital  anatom\ 
of  specimens  collected  in  1934  at  "Ingenio  Agua  Buena,  near 
Tamosopo,  S.L.P.,  '  Mexico.  Pilsbry  (1956:30)  continued  this 
assignation  in  a  faunal  paper  on  northern  Mexico  Both  the 
note  and  the  faunal  paper  were  apparently  overlooked  by  Zilch 
(1960:580,  fig.  2036),  who  figured  Praticolella  (Eduardus)  mar- 
tensiana,  but  incorrectly  gave  the  name  as  Daedalochila  (Ed- 
uardus) martensiana.  This  error  was  carried  over  into  Rich- 
ardson's (1986)  catalog  of  species  of  the  Polygyracea.  Both 
Eduardus  and  Einisa.  which  was  introduced  on  the  same  page, 
were  omitted  from  Clench  and  Turner's  (1962)  "Names  Intro- 
duced b\  Pilsbr>. " 

The  shell  of  P.  martensiana.  with  its  depressed  spire  and 
relatively  open  umbilicus,  is  quite  distinct  from  those  of  all 
other  known  members  of  Praticolella.  It  seems  advisable  there- 
fore to  retain  Eduardus  as  a  subgenus,  pending  a  generic  re- 
vision, which  is  much  needed  although  not  presently  planned 
by  either  author  of  this  note  Thus.  Praticolella  comprises  four 
subgenera:  Eduardus.  Farragutia  Vanatta,  1915;  Filapex  Pils- 
bry, 1940;  and  Praticolella  scnsu  stricto.  Pilsbr\  (1940)  listed 
Filapex  as  a  section,  which  is  equivalent  to  a  subgenus  (Inter- 


national Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature,  1985:  Ar- 
ticle He). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Clench,  W.  J.  and  R.  D.  Turner.  1962.  New  names  introduced 
by  H  A.  Pilsbry  in  the  Mollusca  and  Crustacea.  Academy 
of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia,  Special  Publication 
No.  4:1-218, 

International  C^ommission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature.  1985. 
International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomenclature,  Third 
Edition.  University  of  California  Press,  Berkelev  and  Los 
.Angeles,  p.  1-338, 

Pilsbry,  H.  A.  1930.  Anatomy  and  relationships  of  some  .\mer- 
ican  Helicidae  and  Pol)  g\  ridae.  Proceedings  of  the  .\cad- 
emy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia,  82:303-327. 

Pilsbr\.  H.  A.  1936.  Praticolella  martensiana.  Nautilus  49: 
140 

Pilsbry,  H.  A.  1956.  Inland  Mollusca  of  northern  Mexico.  III. 
Polygyridae  and  Potadominae.  Proceedings  of  the  .Acad- 
emy of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  108:19-40. 

Richardson,  L.  1986  Pol\g\racea:  catalog  of  species  (parts 
1,  Polvgvridae;  2,  Corillidae;  3,  Sagdidae).  Tryonia  13:1- 
139,  ]'-40,  1-38, 

Zilch,  A  1960.  Gastropoda.  Teil  2.  Euthyneura.  Band  6  In: 
Schindewolf,  O.  H.  (ed).  Handbuch  der  Palaozoologie. 
Gebrueder  Borntraeger,  Berlin,  p   1-834 


Page  34 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  1 


News  and  Notices 


SMITHSONIAN  FUNDS  FOR 
MALACOLOGY  STUDFNTS 

The  Division  of  Mollusks,  Department  of  Invertebrate 
Zoology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smith- 
sonian Institution  annoimces  the  availability  of  the  Rose- 
water  Fellow  Award  (up  to  $1,000)  to  be  awarded  to 
graduate  students  of  systematic  malacology.  This  award 
provides  support  for  students  conducting  systematic  stud- 
ies of  Mollusca  (leading  to  publication)  who  require  ac- 
cess to  collections  and  libraries  of  the  Division  of  Mol- 
lusks, National  Museum  of  Natural  History.  Funds  can 
be  used  for  travel,  subsistence,  and  research  costs.  Inter- 
ested students  should  submit  a  succinct  proposal  (1-2 
pages),  including  budget  with  indication  of  any  matching 
funds,  and  a  supporting  letter  from  faculty  advisor(s). 
Application  deadline  is  July  15,  1990.  Award(s)  will  be 
announced  on  August  15,  1990. 


BACK  ISSUES  OF  THE  NAUTILUS 

Volumes  101-103  of  THE  NAUTILUS  are  available  from 
the  business  office  at  $25.00  per  volume.  The  Supplement 
to  volume  103  [Catalogue  of  the  superfamily  Cancellar- 
ioidea  Forbes  and  Haiiley,  1851  (Gastropoda:  Proso- 
branchia)  by  R.  E.  Petit  and  M.  G.  Harasewych]  is  avail- 
able separately  at  $15.00. 

A  small  and  ever-changing  supply  of  earlier  volumes 
is  also  maintained.  Prices  may  vary  depending  on  age 
and  condition  of  individual  issues.  Inquiries  are  invited 
and  want  lists  will  be  maintained. 


INSTRUCTIONS  TO  AUTHORS 


THE  NAUTILUS  publishes  papers  on  all  aspects  of  the 
biolog)  and  systematics  of  mollusks.  Manuscripts  de- 
scribing original,  unpublished  research  as  well  as  review 
articles  will  be  considered.  Brief  articles,  not  exceeding 
1000  words,  will  be  published  as  notes  and  do  not  re- 
quire an  abstract.  Notices  of  meetings  and  other  items 
of  interest  to  malacologists  will  appear  in  a  news  and 
notices  section. 

Manuscripts:  Each  original  manuscript  and  accompa- 
nying illustrations  should  be  submitted  in  triplicate.  Text 
must  be  typed  on  one  side  of  8'/2  x  H  inch  white  paper, 
double  spaced  throughout  (including  literature  cited,  ta- 
bles and  figure  captions),  with  at  least  1  inch  of  margin 
on  all  sides.  All  pages  must  be  numbered  consecutively. 
If  printed  on  a  word  processor,  the  right  margin  should 
be  ragged  rather  than  justified.  Authors  should  follow 
the  recommendations  of  the  Council  of  Biology  Editors 
Style  Manual,  which  is  available  from  the  Council  of 
Biology  Editors,  Inc.,  9650  Rockville  Pike,  Bethesda,  MD 
20814,  U.S.A.  The  first  mention  of  a  scientific  name  in 
the  text  should  be  accompanied  by  the  taxonomic  au- 
thority, including  year.  Latin  names  and  words  to  be 
printed  in  italics  must  be  underlined;  leave  other  indi- 
cations to  the  editor.  Metric  and  Celsius  units  are  to  be 
used. 

The  sequence  of  sections  should  be:  title  page,  abstract 
page,  introduction,  materials  and  methods,  results,  dis- 
cussion, acknowledgements,  literature  cited,  tables,  fig- 
ure captions,  figures.  The  title  page  should  include  the 
title,  author "s  name(s)  and  address(es).  The  abstract  page 
should  contain  tfie  title  and  abstract,  which  should  sum- 
marize in  250  words  or  less  the  scope,  main  results  and 
conclusions  of  the  paper.  The  abstract  may  be  followed 
by  a  maximum  of  8  key  words.  All  references  cited  in 
the  text  must  appear  in  the  literature  cited  section  and 
vice  versa.  In  the  literature  cited  section,  all  authors 
must  be  fully  identified  and  listed  alphabetically.  Follow 
a  recent  issue  of  THE  NAUTILUS  for  bibliographic  style, 
noting  that  journal  titles  must  be  unabbreviated.  Infor- 
mation on  plates  and  figures  should  be  cited  onl\  if  not 
included  in  the  pagination.  Tables  must  be  numbered 
and  each  placed  on  a  separate  sheet.  A  brief  legend  must 
accompany  each  table.  Captions  for  each  group  of  illus- 
trations should  be  typed  on  a  .separate  sheet  and  include 
a  key  to  all  lettered  labeling  appearing  in  that  group  of 
illustrations. 


All  line  drawings  must  be  in  black,  high  quality  ink, 
clearly  detailed  and  completely  labeled.  Photographs 
must  be  on  glossy,  high  contrast  paper.  All  figures  are 
to  be  consecutively  numbered  (figs.  1,  2,  3,  ...  ,  NOT 
figs.  la.  lb,  Ic,  .  .  .  NOR  plate  1,  fig.  1  .  .  .).  Illustrations 
must  be  arranged  in  proportions  that  will  conform  with 
the  width  of  a  page  (6%  inches  or  171  mm)  or  a  column 
(3'/4  inches  or  82  mm).  The  maximum  size  of  a  printed 
figure  is  6%  by  9  inches  or  171  by  228  mm.  All  illus- 
trations must  be  fully  cropped,  mounted  on  a  firm,  white 
backing,  numbered,  labeled  and  camera  ready.  The  au- 
thor s  name,  paper  title  and  figure  number(s)  should  ap- 
pear on  the  back.  Original  illustrations  must  be  between 
one  and  two  times  the  desired  final  size.  It  is  the  author's 
responsibility  that  the  line  weight  and  lettering  arc  ap- 
propriate for  the  desired  reduction.  Original  illustrations 
will  be  returned  to  the  author  if  requested.  Color  illus- 
trations can  be  included  at  extra  cost  to  the  author. 

Voucher  Material:  Deposition  of  type  material  in  a 
recognized  public  museum  is  a  requirement  for  publi- 
cation of  papers  in  which  new  species  are  described. 
Deposition  of  representative  voucher  specimens  in  such 
institutions  is  strongly  encouraged  for  all  other  types  of 
research  papers. 

Processing  of  Manuscripts:  Upon  receipt,  every  manu- 
script is  acknowledged  and  sent  for  critical  review  by  at 
least  two  referees.  These  reviews  serve  as  the  basis  for 
acceptance  or  rejection.  Accepted  manuscripts  are  re- 
turned to  the  author  for  consideration  of  the  reviewers' 
comments.  A  finalized  version  of  the  manuscript  is  re- 
turned to  the  editor  and  sent  to  press.  Two  sets  of  proofs 
are  sent  to  the  author  for  correction.  Changes  other  than 
typesetting  errors  will  be  charged  to  the  author  at  cost. 
One  set  of  corrected  proofs  should  be  sent  to  the  editor 
as  soon  as  possible.  Authors  with  institutional,  grant  or 
other  research  support  will  be  billed  for  page  charges  at 
the  rate  of  $60.00  per  printed  page. 

An  order  form  for  reprints  will  accompany  the  proofs. 
Reprints  may  be  ordered  through  the  editor. 

Manuscripts,  corrected  proofs  and  correspondence  re- 
garding editorial  matters  should  be  sent  to:  Dr.  M.G. 
Harasewych,  Editor,  Division  of  Mollusks,  NHB  stop  118, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  In- 
stitution. Washington,  DC  20560,  USA. 


THIS  PUBLICATION  IS  PRINTED  ON  ACID-FREE  PAPER. 


rHE  NAUTILUS 


Volume  104,  Number  2 
September  6,  1990 
ISSN  0028-1344 

A  quarterly  devoted 
to  malacology. 


Marine  Biological  Laboratory 
LIBRARY 


S 


SEP  1 7  1990         \ 

Woods  Hole,  Mass.      j 


EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 
Dr.  M.  G.  Harasewych 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 

ASSOCIATE  EDITOR 
Dr.  R.  Tucker  Abbott 
American  Malacologists,  Inc. 
P.O.  Box  2255 
Melbourne,  FL  32902 

CONSULTING  EDITORS 
Dr.  Riidiger  Bieler 
Department  of  Malacology 
Delaware  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
P.O.  Box  3937 
Wilmington,  DE  19807 

Dr.  Robert  T.  Dillon,  Jr. 
Department  of  Biology 
College  of  Charleston 
Charleston,  SC  29424 

Dr.  William  K.  Emerson 

Department  of  Living  Invertebrates 

The  American  Museum  of  Natural 

History 

New  York,  NY  10024 

Mr.  Samuel  L.  H.  Fuller 
1053  Mapleton  Avenue 
Suffield,  CT  06078 

Dr.  Robert  Hershler 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 

Dr.  Richard  S.  Houbrick 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


Mr.  Richard  I.  Johnson 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Aurele  La  Rocque 
Department  of  Geology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  James  H.  McLean 
Department  of  Malacology 
Los  Angeles  County  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
900  Exposition  Boulevard 
Los  Angeles,  CA  90007 

Dr.  Arthur  S.  Merrill 
%  Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Ms.  Paula  M.  Mikkelsen 
Harbor  Branch  Oceanographic 
Institution,  Inc. 
Ft.  Pierce,  FL  33450 

Dr.  Donald  R.  Moore 

Division  of  Marine  Geology 

and  Geophysics 

Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  and 

Atmospheric  Science 

University  of  Miami 

4600  Rickenbacker  Causeway 

Miami,  FL  33149 

Mr.  Richard  E.  Petit 

P.O.  Box  30 

North  Myrtle  Beach,  SC  29582 

Dr.  Edward  J.  Petuch 
Department  of  Geology 
Florida  Atlantic  University 
Boca  Raton,  FL  33431 

Dr.  David  H.  Stansbery 
Museum  of  Zoology 
The  Ohio  State  Universitv 
Columbus,  OH  43210 


Dr.  Ruth  D.  Turner 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  (Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Geerat  J.  Vermeij 
Department  of  Geology 
University  of  California  at  Davis 
Davis,  CA  95616 


SUBSCRIPTION  INFORMATION 
The  subscription  rate  per  volume 
is  US  $25.00  for  individuals,  US 
$35.00  for  institutions.  Postage 
outside  the  United  States  is  an 
additional  US  $4.00  for  surface 
and  US  $12.00  for  air  mail.  All 
orders  should  be  accompanied  by 
payment  and  sent  to:  THE 
NAUTILUS,  P.O.  Box  3430,  Silver 
Spring,  MD  20901. 

Change  of  address:    Please  inform 
the  publisher  of  your  new  address 
at  least  6  weeks  in  advance.  All 
communications  should  include 
both  old  and  new  addresses  (with 
zip  codes)  and  state  the  effective 
date. 

THE  NAUTILUS  (ISSN  0028- 
1344)  is  published  quarterly  by 
Trophon  Corporation,  8911  Alton 
Parkway,  Silver  Spring,  MD  20910. 

Second  Class  postage  paid  at  Silver 
Spring,  MD  and  additional  mailing 
offices. 

POSTMASTER:  Send  address 
changes  to:  THE  NAUTILUS 
P.O.  Box  3430 
Silver  Spring,  MD  20901 


THE 


CONTENTS 


N  AU  T I  L  U  S 

Volume  104,  Number  2 

September  6.  1990 

ISSN  0028-1344 

Review  of  the  genus  Colina  H.  and  A.  Adams,  1854 

(Cerithiidae:  Prosobranchia)  35 


Richard  S.  Houbrick 


Harold  G.  Pierce 

Two  unusual  gastropods  from  Late  Pliocene  lakes  in 

northeast  Nebraska 

53 

Edward  J.  Petuch 

A  new  molluscan  faunule  from  the  Caribbean  coast  of 

Panama       

57 

H.  Lee  Fairbanks 

Morphological  comparisons  of  the  species  of  Megapallifera 
(Gastropoda:  Philom>cidae) 

71 

M.  G.  Harasewych 

Ovophagy  in  Anachis  avara  (Say,  1822)  (Gastropoda: 
Columbellidae)                                                                       

76 

Marine  Biological  Laboratory  \ 
LIBRARY 

SEP  1  7  1990 


Woods  Hole,  Mass. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(2):35-52,  1990 


Review  of  the  Genus  Colina  H.  and  A.  Adams,  1854 
(Cerithiidae:  Prosobranchia) 


Richard  S.  Houbrick 

Department  of  Iinertehrate  Zoology 
National  Museum  of  Natural  Histor\ 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington.  DC;  20560,  USA 


Page  35 


ABSTRACT 

The  t\'pes  of  all  nominal  Colina  species  were  examined  as  well 
as  numerous  specimens  in  museum  collections.  Based  on  this 
material  and  gross  anatomical  study  of  one  species,  a  diagnosis 
of  the  genus  is  presented.  Fourteen  species-level  taxa  have  been 
proposed;  of  these,  three  species  are  recognized  herein:  the 
t\  pe-speeies.  Colina  macrostoma  Hinds.  1844.  Colina  selccta 
MeKill  and  Standen.  1S98.  and  Colina  pinguis  {A.  .^dams. 
18.541,  The  radulae  of  Colina  macrostoma  and  Colina  pinguis 
were  examined  and  anatomical  features  of  the  latter  species 
were  studied  for  character  analysis.  Lectotypes  for  Colina  cos- 
tatum  and  Colina  pinguis  are  selected,  and  Colina  gracilis  is 
determined  a  nomcn  dubium.  The  genus  Colina  is  assigned  to 
the  family  Cerithiidae.  subfamily  Cerithiinae.  near  the  genera 
Biltium.  Clypeomorus.  and  Cerithium. 


INTRODUCTION 

One  of  the  more  poorly  known  genera  of  the  Family 
Cerithiidae  Ferussac,  1819,  is  Colina  H.  and  A.  Adams, 
1854.  Shells  of  members  of  this  genus  differ  considerably 
from  those  of  all  other  cerithiids  in  having  an  overall 
pupoid,  fusiform,  frequently-slender  shape,  and  a  mark- 
edly constricted  body  whorl.  The  genus  is  not  species- 
rich,  but  the  alpha  taxonomy  of  the  group  has  never  been 
comprehensively  reviewed.  Colina  species  are  not  well- 
represented  in  museum  collections  and  some  appear  to 
be  relatively  uncommon  in  their  natural  habitats.  To 
date,  their  radular  morphology  has  been  obscure  and 
nothing  has  been  published  about  their  soft  anatomy. 

Colina  has  been  assigned  to  or  grouped  with  a  com- 
posite mixture  of  cerithiid  and  cerithiopsid  genera,  and 
its  placement  among  these  groups  has  varied  among  au- 
thors. For  example,  H.  and  A.  Adams  (1856:286)  listed 
Colina  after  Cerithium  Bruguiere,  1789,  and  Vertagus 
Schumacher,  1817.  Tryon  (1883:247-248)  considered  it 
to  be  a  subgenus  of  Cerithium,  placing  it  between  Cer- 
ithioderma  Conrad,  1860  and  Cerithiella  Verrill,  1882. 
This  allocation  was  obviously  based  on  convergent  shell 
resemblance,  as  Cerithioderma  is  in  Calyptraeoidea,  while 
Cerithiella  is  now  considered  a  member  of  the  Ceri- 
thiopsoidea  (see  Marshall,  1980:85-86).  Cossmann  (1889: 


61)  believed  that  the  protoconch  of  Colina  was  unlike 
those  seen  in  Cerithium  species  and  suggested  that  it  was 
more  like  that  of  Lovenella  Sars,  1878.  a  cerithiopsoide- 
an.  He  subsequently  pointed  out  that  the  name  Colina 
was  preoccupied  and  considered  it  to  be  a  subgenus  of 
Bezanconia  Fischer,  1884,  a  fossil  taxon,  close  to  Atax- 
ocerithium  Tate,  1894  (Cossmann,  190690).  Fossil  Be- 
zanconia species  look  very  much  like  living  species  of 
Ataxocerithium,  a  group  which  has  been  excluded  from 
the  Cerithiidae  and  shown  to  belong  to  Cerithiopsoidea 
(see  Houbrick,  1987a).  Both  Thiele  (1929:212)  and  VVenz 
(1940:758-759)  placed  Colina  within  the  Cerithiidae, 
but  grouped  it  with  Ataxocerithium  and  other  non-cer- 
ithioidean  taxa.  Colina  was  placed  after  Vertagus  but 
before  Campanile  by  Fischer  (1884:680),  thus  further 
linking  it  with  non-cerithioidean  taxa  {Campanile  is  no 
longer  regarded  as  a  cerithioidean.  but  has  been  raised 
to  superfamilial  rank,  Campanioloidea  [see  Houbrick, 
1989]).  Thiele  (1929:212)  proposed  hchnocerithium  as 
a  subgenus  of  Colina,  but  anatomical  examination  of  the 
type-species  of  the  former  taxon  shows  it  to  be  a  txpical 
Cerithium  representative  (Houbrick.  pers.  obs. ). 

As  seen  in  the  taxonomic  historx  presented  above,  the 
composite  systematic  concept  of  Colina  has  oscillated 
between  cerithioidean  and  cerithiopsoidean  assignments 
due  to  the  failure  of  authors  to  recognize  convergent 
shell  characters  in  members  of  both  superfamilies.  \ 
comprehensive  study  (Houbrick,  in  press)  of  the  alpha 
taxonomy  of  Cerithium  Bruguiere,  sensu  lato,  led  to 
questions  about  Colina,  as  several  species  have  been  at- 
tributed to  both  genera  Examination  of  the  types  of  the 
nominal  species  of  Colina  and  study  of  some  preserved 
anatomical  material  has  revealed  a  number  of  interesting 
characters  and  has  prompted  this  review,  which  should 
expose  the  genus  to  more  comprehensive  studies. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

The  types  of  all  nominal  Colina  species  were  examined 
and  specimens  in  major  museums  were  studied  to  de- 
termine the  range  of  variation  in  shell  sculpture.  As  few 
preserved  samples  of  Colina  species  were  available  for 


Page  36 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


anatomical  sIikIn.  the  radiila  and  opcrculuni  ot  some 
species  remain  unkiumn.  No  live  specimens  ol  Colina 
were  e.\amine(l  Despile  repeated  attempts  to  obtain  live- 
collected,  well-preserved  specimens,  the  only  available 
material  was  unrelaxed,  ethanol-preserved  specimens  of 
Colina  pinguis.  from  eastern  Africa.  Unfortunately,  no 
adult  females  were  found  during  the  course  of  this  study, 
and  the  pallia!  oviducts  could  not  be  .studied. 

Specimens  were  dissected  under  a  Wild  M-8  dissecting 
microscope.  Radulae  and  protoconchs  were  studied  using 
an  Hitachi  Scanning  Electron  Microscope. 

.Abbreviations:  AMS,  .Australian  Museum,  Sydney; 
ANSP,  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  Philadelphia; 
BMNM,  British  Museum  (Natural  History);  BPBM,  Bern- 
ice  P.  Bishop  Museum,  Hawaii;  DMNH,  Delaware  Mu- 
seum of  Natural  History;  LACM,  Los  Angeles  County 
Museum  of  Natural  History;  MCZ,  Museum  of  Com- 
parative Zoology;  MNHNP,  Museum  National  d'Histoire 
Naturelle,  Paris;  NMW,  National  Museum  of  Wales; 
USNM,  United  States  National  Museum;  WAM,  Western 
Australian  Museum. 

As  mentioned  earlier,  morphological  characters  de- 
rived from  soft  part  anatomy  are  known  chiefly  from 
ethanol-preserved  specimens  of  Colina  pingins  and  from 
one  dried  sijecirnen  of  C.  macrosionia;  thus,  what  follows 
is  incomplete  and  may  be  inaccurate,  as  some  anatomical 
features  have  been  distorted  due  to  poor  preservation. 


SYSTEMATIC  REVIEW 

An  overview  of  the  taxonomy,  morphology,  and  the  ecol- 
og>  of  Colina  species  is  presented  below.  A  discussion  of 
the  relationship  of  this  genus  to  other  cerithiids  and  a 
review  of  the  species  follows. 

Colina  W    and  A.  .Adams,  1S54 

Colina  H.  and  \  .\danis,  1854:2SH,  pi  oO,  fig.  2  (type  species 
by  o.d.:  Cchthium  macwstonia  Hinds,  1844);  Tryon,  1883: 
247-248.  pi,  69,  fig.  52;  1887:141;  Fischer,  1884:680;  Coss- 
mann,  1889:61-62;  Thiele,  1929:212;  Wenz,  1940:758. 

Colinia  H.  and  .A.  .Adams,  1858  [emended]  Cossmann,  1906: 
90-91  (not  C.oliuia  Nuttaij,  1832,  Aves);  Wenz,  1940:758. 

Diagnosis:  Shell  small,  elongate,  usually  decollate,  and 
pupoid  with  gibbous  midwhorls;  teleoconch  sculptured 
with  axial  ribs;  body  whorl  constricted.  Columella  with 
strong  internal  plait.  Aperture  narrowly  ovoid  and  with 
expanded  outer  lip.  Operculum  corneous,  ovoid,  pauci- 
spiral,  with  subterminal  nucleus.  Mantle  edge  dorsalK 
fringed  with  papillae.  Foot  large,  having  epipodial  skirt 
fringed  with  papillae  and  large,  posterior  operculiferous 
lobe;  sole  with  well-developed  propodial  mucus  gland 
tih!  massive  centrally  located,  metapodial  mucus  gland 
•!i  longitudinal  slit-like  opening.  Alimentar\  system 
-,•;  rising  taenioglossate  radula  with  scjuarish  rachidian 
(■"  '.'i  i.inf  esophageal  gland,  and  stomach  with  gastric 
blii'-l'i  jr  .1  ,tyln  sac.  Osphradium  bipectinate,  very  broad 
CtcdiJi uin  <-.\tending  length  ol  mantle  cavity  and  com- 
prising i   :ig  digit  .ip  filaments.  Pallial  gonoducts  open. 


Epiathroid  nervous  system  w  ith  long  cerebro-pedal  con- 
nectives. 

Synonymic  Remarks:  The  name  Colina  was  thought  to 
be  a  secondary  homonym  of  the  bird  taxon,  Colinus 
Goldfuss,  1820;  by  Cossmann  (1906:90-91),  who  emend- 
ed the  name  to  Colinia  (preoccupied  by  Colinia  Nuttall, 
1832,  also  Aves).  This  action  was  unnecessary,  as  Article 
56b  of  the  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomencla- 
ture (ICZN,  1985)  clearly  states  that  even  if  the  differ- 
ence between  two  genus-group  names  is  only  one  letter, 
these  two  names  are  not  homonyms;  thus,  Colina  is  a 
valid  genus  group  name,  and  is  not  preoccupied 

Colina  macrostoma  (Hinds,  1844) 
(figures  6-44) 

Ccrithium  macruatuma  Hinds,  1844:27,  pi.  26,  ligs.  1 1-12  (llo- 
lotype  [probable]:  BMNH  1989181,  10.1  mm;  Type  local- 
it\ :  Borneo);  Sowerb\ ,  1855:877,  pi.  184,  fig.  219;  Sowerby 
in  Reeve,  1865:  pi  17,  fig.  118;  Tryon,  1887:142,  pi.  26, 
figs.  10,  13-15  {in  part). 

Culina  pupiformis  A.  Adams,  1853:176,  pi.  20.  fig.  14  iHolo- 
type:  BMNH  1989182,  13.6  mm.  T\  pe  locality:  Duma- 
guete,  Philippines). 

Ccrithium  (Colina)  costatum  .A.  Adams  in  Sowcrbv,  1855:126, 
pi.  184,  fig.  220(Lectot\pe,  here  selected:  BMNH  1989180, 
11.1  mm;  Type  locality:  not  given  (not  CU'rithium  costa- 
tum Defrance,  1817). 

Ccrithium  pupacjorme  A,  Adams.  Sowerby.  18.55:877,  pi.  184, 
fig.  221;  Sowerby  in  Reeve,  1866,  pi.  17,  fig.  122. 

Ccrithium  costifcrum  (cmd.  pro  costatum  .\  .Adams)  Sowerb\ . 
18,55:896,  pi.  184,  fig,  220;  Sowerbv  in  Reeve,  1866:  pi. 
17,  fig.  117, 

Colina  gracilis  H.  Adams,  1866:150-151  (Type  material  not 
located,  no  figure  given:  nomen  dubium). 

Colina  pijgmaca  H.  Adams,  1867:308,  pi.  19,  fig.  20  (Holotype: 
BMNH  1878.1.28.32,  10.1  mm;  Type  locality:  Borneo). 

Ccrithium  coarctatum  Sowerby,  1866:  pi.  12  [supplementary], 
figs.  321-322  (Type  material  not  found;  Type  locality:  not 
given;  Sowerb)  s  fig,  32  selectetl  to  represent  le'ctot\pe)- 

Cerithium  (Colina)  macrostoma  Hintl.s,  E,  .\.  Smith.  1884:66- 
67, 

Ccritliiuni  rigens  Bayle,  1880:244  (replacement  name  for  Cer- 
ilhiuiu  costatum  .A,  .Adams,  1855).  Tryon,  1887:142. 

Description:  Shell  (figures  6-41):  Shell  narrowly  tur- 
reted,  elongated,  comprising  about  15  inflated  whorls. 
Protoconch  small,  comprising  one  smooth  whorl.  Upper 
teleoconch  whorls  sculptured  with  3  spiral  cords  and 
numerous  fine  axial  striae.  Adult  teleoconch  whorls  sculp- 
tured with  about  4  major  spiral  cords  and  4  minor  spiral 
cords;  central  cord  frecjuentK'  large,  carinate;  subsutural 
cord  with  minute  axial  pleats.  Spiral  cords  crossed  by 
12-13  weak  to  strong  axial  ribs,  forming  cancellate  sculp- 
ture; intersections  commonly  beaded  Suture  moderately 
impressed,  distinit  Boil)  whorl  strongly  constricted, 
elongated,  .sculptured  with  broad,  flattened  spiral  cords 
and  weak  axial  striae  and  incised  lines.  Aperture  ovately 
elongate  with  moderateK  elongate,  slightK  reflexed  ca- 
nal, concave  columella;  lliiring  outer  lip  of  aperture,  thick 
and  smooth  at  edge.  Shell  color  [linkish  tan  to  light  brow  n. 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1990 


Page  37 


cmg 


Figures  1-5.  Anatomical  features  of  Colina  pingttis.  1.  ventral  aspect  of  the  sole  of  foot,  showing  crescent  shaped  propodium, 
fringing  papillae  and  operculiferous  lobe  of  the  epipodial  fringing  skirt,  and  two  mucus  glands,  bar  =  1  mm;  2.  right  lateral  aspect 
showing  mantle  edge  and  headfoot,  bar  =  3  mm;  3,  longitudinal  cross  section  through  middle  of  foot  showing  columella  muscle 
and  metapodial  mucus  gland;  4.  frontal  section  through  propodium  showing  details  of  propodial  mucus  gland;  5.  section  of 
osphradium  showing  layout  of  pectens.  Abbreviations:  cm — columellar  muscle;  cmg — columellar  muscle  groove;  d — duct  of  me- 
tapodial mucus  gland;  dp — duct  of  propodial  mucus  gland;  eps — epipodial  skirt;  f — flap  covering  slit  into  propodial  mucus  gland; 
mmg — metapodial  mucus  gland;  mp — mantle  papilla;  ms — metapodial  slit;  op — operculum;  opl — operculiferous  lobe;  p — papilla; 
pmg — propodial  mucus  gland;  s — sole  of  foot;  sn — snout. 


with  dark  brown  spiral  lines  and  bands,  and  blotched 
with  white,  especially  on  beads. 

Radula  (figures  42-44):  Raduiar  ribbon  small,  short, 
about  one-seventh  the  shell  length.  Rachidian  tooth  (Fig- 
ure 44)  with  square  basal  plate  having  slight  median 
posterior  projection  and  weak  lateral  fold  at  each  pos- 
terior base;  cutting  edge  with  median,  spade-shaped  main 
cusp  flanked  on  each  side  by  2-.'3  pointed  denticles.  Lat- 
eral tooth  (figure  44)  with  rhomboid  basal  plate  having 


short  lateral  extension  and  wide  central  pillar  with  small 
pustule;  cutting  edge  with  large  pointed  main  cusp,  one 
inside  denticle  and  2-3  outside  pointed  denticles.  Mar- 
ginal teeth  (figures  42,  43)  spatulate  having  wide  bases 
and  curved  tips  w  ith  long  pointed  main  cusp,  2-3  inner 
pointed  denticles  and  2  outer  denticles;  outer  marginal 
tooth  same  but  lacking  outer  denticles. 

Animal:  Dried  specimen  from  Japan  (ANSP  240281) 
with  papillate  mantle  edge,  moderately  long  snout  and 


Page  38 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1990 


Page  39 


long,  thick  cephalic  tentacles.  Foot  long,  somewhat  tu- 
bular in  shape,  having  narrow  sole. 

Synonymic  remarks:  The  type  lot  of  Cerithium  macro- 
stoma  Hinds  originally  consisted  of  five  specimens  glued 
to  boards  The  one  surviving  specimen  is  labeled  "prob- 
able holot\pe":  it  is  the  figured  specimen  in  Sowerby  s 
Thesaurus  Conclnjliorum  (fig.  219)  and  in  Conchologia 
Iconica  (pi.  17,  figs.  118a,b).  The  type  of  Colina  gracilis 
H.  Adams  has  not  been  found.  Considering  that  the  de- 
scription is  ambiguous  and  no  figure  was  presented,  it 
seems  prudent  to  regard  this  ta.xon  as  a  nomen  duhium. 
H.  Adams  (1866)  noted  its  close  resemblance  to  Colina 
macrostoma  and  later  remarked  (1866:308)  that  "The 
species  I  lately  described  as  C.  gracilis  1  find  has  been 
since  described  by  Mr.  G.  B.  Sowerby  under  the  name 
of  C.  coarctata.  '  Although  the  type  of  Cerithium  coarc- 
tatum  has  not  been  found,  Sowerby  s  figures  adequately 
represent  it,  and  indicate  close  resemblance  to  Colina 
macrostoma.  The  many  synonyms  of  this  species  lia\e 
resulted  from  the  failure  of  authors  to  appreciate  the 
wide  range  of  intraspecific  shell  characters.  Recognition 
of  the  variability  of  Colina  macrostoma  was  first  noted 
by  E.  A.  Smith  (1884:66-67),  who  suggested  that  Colina 
costata,  C.  costiferum.  C.  pygmaea,  and  C.  pupiforn}is 
were  all  ".  .  .  mere  variations  of  one  and  the  same  shell,  ' 
and  who  noted  the  variation  in  whorl  number  and  shape 
due  to  loss  of  the  upper  spire.  While  it  may  be  difficult 
to  believe  tliat  extreme  phenotypes  such  as  the  shells  of 
the  nominal  species  shown  in  figures  6-41  are  conspe- 
cific,  examination  of  many  museum  specimens  and  the 
types  of  the  nominal  species  listed  in  the  above  synonymy 
reconfirms  E.  A.  Smith's  conclusion. 

Colina  selecta  Melvill  &  Standen,  1898  (Figures  46, 
47),  is  conchologically  ver>'  close  to  Colina  macrostoma, 
and  may  be  a  synonym  of  this  species,  but  this  remains 
unresolved,  due  to  lack  of  comparative  material. 

Discussion:  This  species  is  highly  variable  in  shell  shape 
and  sculpture.  Older  adult  shells  have  a  truncated,  pu- 
pate appearance  due  to  decollation  of  early  whorls  and 
erosion  of  the  apex,  and  these  look  very  different  from 
nondecollate  shells  (see  figures  37,  38,  40,  41).  Some 
specimens  lose  more  of  the  early  whorls  than  do  others. 
When  the  apex  of  the  spire  has  been  broken  off,  the 
animal  closes  the  opening  with  a  spiral  plug  and  fre- 
quently this  is  inset  deeply  within  the  old  whorl  (figures 
33-36). 

There  is  a  great  intraspecific  difference  in  whorl  num- 
ber and  in  the  number  and  strength  of  the  axial  ribs.  A 
range  of  phenotypes,  from  those  having  extremeK  slen- 
der shells  (figures  8-10,  13-16,  19,  20)  to  those  with 
highly  inflated  midwhorls  with  wide  axial  ribs  on  their 


shells  (figures  29-34,  37,  38),  may  occur  within  the  same 
population.  Shell  sculpture  is  highly  variable,  but  gen- 
erally comprises  4-6  spiral  cords  of  which  the  dominant 
one  frequently  forms  a  keel  on  the  middle  of  the  whorl. 
Spiral  cords  are  crossed  by  12-14  strong  axial  ribs  pre- 
senting an  overall  cancellate  appearance  (figures  19,  20, 
39).  Some  phenotvpes  have  small  nodes  at  the  intersec- 
tions (figures  8,  9,' 13,  14,  17,  18,  22,  23).  The  subsutural 
spiral  cord  has  many  minute  axial  pleats.  The  body  whorl 
cords  are  flat  and  weakly  sculptured  with  about  10  in- 
cised spiral  lines  (figure  39).  There  is  seldom  any  axial 
sculpture  on  the  bod\  whorl  except  for  the  axial  pleats 
beneath  the  suture.  Shell  color  varies  from  light  tan  to 
pinkish-brown,  the  body  whorl  and  especially  its  incised 
spiral  lines,  frequently  being  brown.  These  show  through 
on  the  inside  of  the  outer  apertural  lip. 

Shells  from  Japan  and  the  Philippines  (figures  6-25) 
are  slender  and  higliK  elongate,  while  those  from  Aus- 
tralia and  the  Indian  Ocean  (figures  26-41)  tend  to  be 
shorter,  broader,  and  more  pupate.  These  shorter  phe- 
notypes have  been  given  the  names  Colina  pupijormis 
and  Colina  pygmaea.  Initially,  I  was  inclined  to  recog- 
nize these  nominal  species  as  a  subspecies  of  Colina  mac- 
rostoma because  their  shorter,  more  stocky  shells  tend 
to  occur  in  more  southern  and  western  geographical  re- 
gions. However,  there  are  intergrades  (figure  39),  and 
non-decoUate  specimens  from  these  regions  bridge  the 
gap.  Specimens  from  these  parts  of  the  range  are  fre- 
cjuently  badly  eroded  and  uncommon  in  collections:  when 
more  material  is  available  for  study,  this  putative  geo- 
graphic trend  in  morphology  may  become  better  doc- 
umented. Currently,  there  is  insufficient  material  to  un- 
equivocally resolve  this  issue,  and  it  seems  best  to  be 
conservative  and  regard  these  nominal  taxa  as  pheno- 
t\pes  of  Colina  macrostoma. 

There  is  little  information  about  the  specific  micro- 
habitat  of  Colina  macrostoma.  In  Japan  and  the  Phil- 
ippines, the  habitat  appears  to  be  shallow,  subtidal  sea 
grass  beds  (IISNM  343907,  273627).  Although  spa\\-n  and 
larvae  of  Colina  macrostoma  are  unknown,  its  proto- 
conch  morphology  (Figure  28)  suggests  a  lecithotrophic 
type  of  development  (see  Robertson,  1974;  Jablonsky  and 
Lutz,  1980). 

Geographic  distribution  (figure  45):  This  species  ap- 
pears to  be  confined  to  the  Indo- West-Pacific,  having  a 
distribution  from  Japan  south  through  the  Philippines, 
Indonesia  and  tropical  Australia,  and  into  the  Indian 
Ocean  as  far  west  as  eastern  India  and  Ceylon. 

Specimens  examined:  INDIA:  W  of  Mandapam,  Cull 
of  Mannar  (ANSP  302283).  CEYLON:  (USNM  91248). 


Figures  6-25.  Colina  macrostoma  (Hinds)  6-7.  iectotype  of  Cerithium  macrostoma  Hinds,  Borneo,  BMNH  1989181,  length 
10.1  mm;  8-10.  Port  Douglas,  Queensland,  Australia,  LACM  116089,  length  18.9  mm;  11-12.  Iectotype  of  Cerithium  (Colina) 
Costatum  A,  Adams,  BMNH  1989180,  length  11.1  mm;  13-18.  Sulu  Archipelago,  Philippines,  LACM  76874,  length  15.5  mm. 
165  mm,  11.6  mm,  respectively;  19-20.  Shimoda,  Shizuoka  Pref.,  Japan.  L,'\C:M  9:3102,  length  19  0  mm;  21.  holotype  of  Colina 
pupijormis  A.  .^dams,  Dumaguete,  Philippines,  BMNH  1989182,  length  1'3.6  nmi;  22-23.  Sulu  Archipelago,  Philippines,  L.-KCM 
76874,  length  15  :3  mm;  24-25.  Honshu,  Japan,  ANSP  240281,  length  12.0  nmi 


Page  40 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1990 


Page  41 


Figures  42-44.  Colina  macrostoma.  scanning  electron  micrographs  of  radula  42.  portion  of  radula  with  marginal  teeth  spread 
open,  bar  =  40  /urn;  43.  portion  of  radula  with  folded  marginal  teeth,  bar  =  40  iim,  44.  detail  of  lateral  and  rachidian  teeth,  bar 
=  20  Mill. 


BORNEO:  (type-specimen,  Borneo  (BMNH).  JAPAN: 
Shirahama,  near  Shimoda,  Kii,  Shizuoka  Pref.,  Honshu 
(LACM  93102);  Ikenedan  (BPBM  229662);  Shirahama, 
Kii,  Shizuoka  Pref.,  Honshu  (MCZ);  Oshima.  Osumi, 
Honshu  (USNM  343907,  273627,  MCZ);  Hachijo  Shima, 
off  Tokyo  (ANSP  2402S1,  240158,  240223);  Kanada  Bav, 
Kyushu  (USNM  91115);  Banda,  Boshiu  (ANSP  65275, 
MCZ);  Hirado,  Hizen,  Kvushu  (USNM  343908,  ANSP 
1217).  RYUKYUS:  Loo  Choo  Ids  (ANSP  195629);  Ada 
Village,  Kumigami  Prov.,  Okinawa  (ANSP  320695). 
PHILIPPINES:   Laminusa,  Siasi,  Sulu  Archipelago 


(LACM  76874),  WESTERN  AUSTRALIA:  North  West 
Cape  Reef,  Yardie  Creek  to  Tantabiddi  (WAM  1020- 
84);  Mangrove  Bay,  North  West  Cape  (WAM  1021-84). 
QUEENSLAND,  AUSTRALIA:  Grays  Bay,  Bovven, 
Queensland  (AMS  CI  17180);  2  mi  N  of  Ellis  Beach, 
Queensland  (AMS  CI  17178);  Mission  Beach,  Queensland 
(AMS  C17177);  Clump  Pt,  N  Mission  Beach,  Queensland 
(BMNH);  Dunk  Id,  Queensland  (ANSP  140135.  140136); 
Four  Mile  Reef,  4  mi  S  of  Port  Douglas  (AMS  CI  17175); 
headland  between  Kings  &  Queens  Beaches,  Bowen  (AMS 
C117169,  117173);  Lindeman  Ids,  N  of  Mackay  (AMS 


Figures  26-41.  Colina  macrostoma  (Hinds).  26-27.  holotype  of  Colina  pygmaea  H.  Adams,  Borneo,  BMNH  1878.1.28.32,  length 
10  1  mm;  28.  protoconch  and  early  whorls,  AMS  C117177,  total  length  3  mm;  29-30.  N.  Mission  Beach,  Queensland,  .Australia, 
BMNH,  length  10.7  mm;  31-34.  Ellis  Beach,  Queensland,  Australia,  AMS  C117178,  lengths  95  mm,  99  mm,  respectively;  35- 
36.  N.  Mission  Beach,  Queensland,  Australia,  BMNH,  length  8  3  mm;  37-38.  Ellis  Beach,  Queensland,  Australia,  AMS  C117178, 
length  9.6  mm;  39.  Port  Douglas,  Queensland,  Australia,  AMS  CI  17177,  scanning  electron  micrograph,  length  9.8  mmm;  40-41. 
Hinchenbrook  Id.,  Queensland,  Australia,  AMS,  length  9  3  mm 


Page  42 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


20-  40-  60"  8tf 

Figure  45.    Geographic  distribution  of  Colina  species. 


100" 


120 


140 


160° 


C178174);  Hinchenbrook  Id,  Queensland  (AMS);  Thurs- 
day Id,  Torres  Strait,  Queensland  (BMNH  8212697). 

Colina  selecta  Melviil  &  Standen,  1898 
(figures  46,  47) 

Colina  selecta  Mclvill  &  Standen,  189«:31,  pi.  1,  fijr.  2  (Holo- 
t\pe:  Manchester  Museum,  1.5  1  ini'i;  Type  locality;  Ma- 
dras, India). 

Description:  Shell  (figures  46,  47):  Shell  turreted,  elon- 
gate, narrow  comprising  about  12  convex  whorls  having 
overall  cancellate  sculpture.  Protoconch  unknown.  Early 
teleoconch  whorls  with  3-4  four  spiral  cords.  Adult  te- 
leoconch  whorls  scul[)tured  with  5  spiral  cords  crossed 
by  14-1,5  axial  ribs  and  with  siibsutural  cord  pleated 
axially.  Suture  impressed.  Body  whorl  elongate,  con- 
stricted, with  about  10  flattened  spiral  cords,  but  lacking 
axial  sculpture.  Aperture  narrow,  ovate,  with  slight  si- 
phonal  constriction  and  short,  reflected  canal  and  smooth 
outer  lip.  Clolumella  concave  with  slight  callus.  Shell  color 
%\hitish-gray  to  tan.  Operculum,  radula  and  animal  un- 
known. 

l)!-.rii';si<in:  This  species  is  based  solely  upon  the  type 
'uii  (i;il  .'im prising  two  specimens.  It  is  mori^hologi- 
i  :iil  ■  loM-  i(,  Molina  macroslotna  with  v\hich  it  is  geo- 
grapl.'.  .liv  svnipatric  In  India.  Mclvill  &  Standen  (1898: 
31  pon.i,  .!  iiiif  th,  resemblance  of  Colina  selecta  to  Coli- 


na macrostoma  (cited  as  C.  taeniatum),  but  noted  that 
it  was  not  as  pupiform  in  shape,  and  not  as  nodulated 
transversely.  Colina  selecta  has  highly  cancellate  sculp- 
ture, a  greater  number  of  axial  ribs,  and  an  unflaring 
aperture.  Considering  the  extreme  phenotypic  variation 
observed  in  Colina  macrostoma,  it  is  not  unreasonable 
to  suggest  that  Colina  selecta  may  be  mereK  another 
variation  of  the  former  species.  However,  Colina  selecta 
is  known  only  from  a  few  specimens,  and  as  no  specimens 
of  Colina  macrostoma  with  intermediate  shell  sculpture 
bridging  the  gap  have  been  seen,  it  seems  best  to  regard 
Colina  selecta  as  a  good  species  until  evidence  is  pre- 
sented suggesting  otherwise. 

Geographic  distribution  (figure  45):  The  range  of  this 
species  is  limited  to  the  t\pe  localit\  in  Madras,  India. 

Specimens  examined:  INDI.\:  Madras  (type-specimen, 
Manchester  Museum);  Krusadi,  Madras  (paratope,  NMW 
55158). 


Colina  pingttis  (A.  .\dams,  1854) 
(figures  48-76) 

C'cnlhimu  pin^uis  .\  .\daMis,  IS.")l:S(i  ll.frtn(\  |H-,  Iktc  des- 
ii;natcd:  HMNII  1989200  1.  17  7  nun,  l  paralectotypes; 
BMNH  19S99()()  2-5;  Type  loc,ilit\  I'hilippines [in  error]; 
here  cdirrclcil  lo  Cape  Natal.  .Snulli  Africa); 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1990 


Page  43 


Figures  46-4-7.    Colina  selecta  Mel\'ill  &  Standen.  46.  liolotvpe,  Madras,  Manchester  Museum,  15,1  mm  length;  47.  paratype, 

NMW  55158,  10,5  mm  length. 


Cerilhinm  pinguc  A,  Adams,  Sowerby,  1855:877,  pi,  184,  fig. 
217;  Sowerby  in  Reeve  18Wi:  pi.  17,  fig.  121. 

Cerithium  (Colina)  pingue  A.  Adams.  Tryon,  1887:141,  pi,  26, 
figs,  8,9,11;  Abrard,  1942:61,  pi.  6,  fig.  28. 

Cerithium  taeniatum  Sowerby  in  Reeve,  1866:  pi.  17,  fig.  119 
(Holotype:  BMNH  1989199;  Type-locality:  Cape  Natal, 
South  Africa,  16  mm  (not  Cerithium  taeniatum  Quo\  and 
Gaimard,  1834:11.3);  Sowerby,  1866:  pi.  17.  fig,  .320;  1866, 
pi.  12  [supplementar\],  fig.  320, 

Cerithium  contraclum  Sowerb\,  1855:877,  pi,  184,  fig,  218 
(Holotype:  BMNH  1907.10,28,129,  17  mm;  Type  localit>  : 
unkown;  not  Cerithium  contractum  Bellardi,  1850);  Sow- 
erby in  Reeve,  1866:  pi.  17.  fig.  120. 

Cerithium  crumena  Bayle,  1880:245-246  (replacement  name 
for  Cerithium  contractum  Sowerb),  1855). 

Colina  perimensis  Jousseaume.  1930:28.5-286  (replacement 
name  for  Cerithium  taeniatum  Sowerby,  1866). 

Description:  Shell  (figures  48-73):  Shell  moderately 
elongate,  decollate  (adults  usualK'  missing  3-4  vvhoris), 
adults  with  plug-like  apex;  upper  whorls  v\ith  concave 
outline,  conve.x,  swollen  middle  whorls,  and  constricted 
body  whorl.  Shell  shape  pupate  due  to  decollation  of 
early  whorls  and  formation  of  secondary  apex.  Proto- 
conch  comprising  about  2  imsculptured  smooth  w  horls 
with  slightly  sinuous  apertural  lip.  Early  teleoconch  whorls 
sculptured  with  3-4  spiral  striae;  teleoconch  whorls  con- 
cave, pendant;  penultimate  whorl  convex.  Adult  whorls 


with  overall  sculpture  of  fine  spiral  striae  and  incised 
lines  and  with  10-14  large  axial  plicae  or  ribs  on  lower 
half.  Body  whorl  large,  elongate,  tightly  constricted,  and 
weakly  sculptured  w  ith  subsutural  plicae  and  spiral  cords. 
Suture  moderateK  impressed.  Aperture  narrowly  ovoid 
with  short,  broad  weakly  reflexed  anterior  canal,  and 
smooth  dilated  outer  lip.  Columella  concave,  smooth  w  ith 
slight  wash  at  aperture;  2  internal  columellar  plaits  ex- 
tending up  pillar.  Shell  color  white,  with  large  tan  to 
brown  blotches  or  maculations;  thin  brown  stripes  on 
body  whorl  appearing  as  stripes  or  brown  checks  at  ap- 
erture inner  lip;  axial  ribs  frequently  white.  Periostracum 
tan,  thin.  Operculum  (Figures  67,  68)  corneous,  ovate, 
paucispiral  with  eccentric  nucleus. 

Animal  (figures  1-5):  Body  comprising  about  four 
whorls.  Long,  wide  columellar  muscle  2  whorls  in  length; 
anterior  columellar  muscle  with  2  deep  grooves  (figure 
3,  cmg)  corresponding  to  columellar  plaits  of  shell  pillar. 
Ophalic  tentacles  moderately  elongate,  but  fat  and  very 
broad  with  large  peduncular  eyes  (figure  2);  snout  mod- 
erately elongate,  bilobed  at  tip.  Inhalant  siphon  slightly 
protruding,  with  large  papillae  at  edge  and  darkly  pig- 
mented undersurface.  Foot  large;  epipodial  skirt  fringed 
with  many  short  papillae  (figure  1,  p)  and  having  large, 
posterior  operculiferous  lobe  (figure  1,  opl);  sole  with 


Page  44 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


;  i.n.rrs  4-8-55.   Colina  pinguis  and  types  of  nominal  species.  48-49.  lectotype  of  Cerithium  pinguis  A.  Adams  from  <^ape  Natal 
a,  RMNH  1989200/1,  17  7  mm  length;  50-51.  paralectotype  of  Cerithium  pinguis.  Cape  Natal,  South  Africa,  BMNH 
_    f    n.S  mm  length;  52-53.  holotype  of  Cerithium  taeniatum  Sowerhy,  Cape  Natal,  South  Africa,  BMNH  1989199, 
Iti.w  niiT.  lei.gln,  54-55.  liolotvpe  of  Cerithium  amtraclum  Sowerhy,  BMNH  1907.10.28.129,  17.0  mm  length. 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1990 


Page  45 


Figures  56-66.  Colina  pinguis,  showing  variation  in  pattern  and  sculptural  niorpholi)g>  .  56-57.  Port  Alfred,  South  Africa,  DMNH 
16073,  17.3  mm  length;  58.  shell  cut  axially  to  show  weak  columellar  fold,  16.0  mm  length;  59-60.  Port  Alfred,  South  Africa, 
DMNH  16073,  18.5  mm  length;  61-62.  Djibouti,  Djibouti,  MNHNP,  18.5  mm  length;  63-64.  Port  Alfred,  South  Africa,  DMNH 
16073,  16.9  mm  length;  65-66.  Djibouti,  Djibouti,  MNHNP,  15.8  mm  length. 


Page  46 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1990 


Page  47 


Figures  74-76.  Colina  pinguis,  scanning  electron  micrographs  of  radula  (Port  Alfred,  South  Africa,  DMNH  16073).  74.  general 
view  of  ribbon  with  marginal  teeth  spread  open,  bar  =  6  nm;  75.  half  row,  bar  =  6  ^m;  76.  detail  of  lateral  and  rachidian  teeth, 
bar  =  40  nm. 


Figures  67-73.  Colina  pmguis.  scanning  electron  micrographs  of  shell  and  operculum  (Oman,  BMNH)  67-68.  attached  and 
free  sides  of  the  operculum,  respectively,  bar  =  0  9  mm;  69.  early  juvenile  whorls  (protoconch  missing),  bar  =  0.5  mm;  70-73. 
lateral  and  apical  views  of  decollate  shell  apices,  showing  broken  original  shell  and  replacement  plugs,  bar  (70,  72)  =  0.9  mm,  bar 
(71,  73)  =  0.,5  mm. 


Page  48 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


large,  centrally-located,  slit-like  metapodial  mucus  gland 
(Figure  1,  mmg)  extending  deeply  within  central  foot. 
Propodial  mucus  gland  (figures  1,  4,  pmg)  crescent 
shaped,  slit-like,  extending  deeply  into  front  edge  of  foot, 
and  overlain  b\  thin  epithelial  flap. 

Radula  (figures  74-76):  Radula  about  one-fifth  the  shell 
length.  Rachidian  tooth  (figure  76)  with  square  basal 
plate  ha\ing  small  central  bottom  projection  and  with 
slightly  raised  fold  at  each  lateral  edge;  cutting  edge 
convex,  with  large,  central  spade-shaped  cusp  flanked  on 
each  side  with  2,  sometimes  3  small,  blunt  denticles. 
Lateral  tooth  (figure  76)  rhomboid-shaped  with  mod- 
erate lateral  extension  and  having  wide  posterior  pillar- 
shaped  extension  with  small  bead;  cutting  edge  com- 
prising small  inner  denticle,  large  pointed  cusp  and  3 
small  outer  denticles.  Marginal  teeth  (figure  76)  spat- 
ulate,  broad  at  middle,  curved  at  tips;  inner  marginal 
tooth  with  2  inner  denticles,  long  pointed  central  cusp 
and  2  outer  denticles;  outer  marginal  tooth  same  but 
lacking  outer  denticles. 

Synonymic  remarks:  This  species  has  four  synonymous 
names.  The  type  lot  of  Colina  pinguis  comprises  five 
specimens,  which  vary  greatly  in  sculpture  and  shape. 
The  largest  specimen  (figures  48,  49),  which  corresponds 
to  Sowerby's  (1855)  fig.  217  in  the  Thesaurus,  also  ap- 
pears to  be  the  figured  specimen  of  Colina  pinguis  in 
Conchologia  Iconica  (1866:  pi.  17,  fig.  121)  and  is  here 
designated  as  the  lectotype.  The  second  largest  specimen 
of  the  type  lot  (figures  50,  51;  paralectotype)  was  figured 
by  Sowerby  (1866)  in  Conchylogia  Iconica  on  the  same 
plate  (fig.  120),  and  named  Cerithium  contractum,  but 
this  name  is  preoccupied.  The  holotype  of  Colina  taenia- 
tum  (name  preoccupied)  is  a  weakly  sculptured,  non- 
decollate  specimen  (figures  52,  53)  of  Colina  pinguis. 
which  shows  some  brown  spiral  stripes  not  seen  in  the 
type  lot.  Both  Colina  taeniatum  and  Colina  contractum 
were  given  replacement  names  by  Jousseaume  (1930) 
and  Bayle  (1880),  respectively. 

Discussion:  Colina  pinguis  is  easily  distinguished  from 
its  congener,  Colina  macrostoma,  by  its  larger,  wider, 
and  heavier  shell.  Its  upper  whorls  are  concave  and  pen- 
dant, sculpture  is  not  usually  as  cancellate  as  in  Colina 
macrostoma,  and  it  never  attains  the  narrowly  elongate 
form  of  that  species.  There  is  no  geographical  overlap 
between  the  two  species. 

Examination  of  many  lots  of  Colina  pinguis  from  South 
.\frica  and  from  more  northern  locations  reveals  consid- 
erable sculptural  variety  within  populations  (see  figures 
48-66).  Moreover,  older,  decollate  individuals  (figures 
48-55)  have  a  fatter,  more  .squat  aspect  than  younger, 
more  fusiform  individuals  with  retained  spires  (figures 
56-66).  Specimens  from  the  Red  Sea  (figures  61,  62,  65, 
66)  and  northwestern  Indian  Ocean  appear  to  be  more 
darkly  colored  than  those  from  South  Africa. 

This  species,  commonly  recorded  from  South  Africa. 
pr  .1  inix  occurs  in  suitable  habitats  all  along  the  north- 
eustern  I'ncan  coast,  which  is  more  poorly  known.  Spec- 
imens In;  tn  Kr-rva  indicate  that  southern  populations  are 


probably  continuous  with  more  northern  ones  in  the  Red 
Sea.  Colina  pinguis  lives  gregariousK  in  lower  midtidal 
pools,  chiefly  in  clumps  of  coralline  algae  (Kilburn  & 
Rippey,  1982:54).  A  label  accompanying  specimens  from 
Oman  in  the  British  Museum  (Natural  Histor\  )  collection 
also  cites  coralline  algae  as  the  habitat.  Bosch  and  Bosch 
(1982:49)  record  Colina  pinguis  occurring  on  sand  and 
algae  at  low  tide  in  Oman. 

The  spawn  of  Colina  pinguis  has  been  briefly  de- 
scribed and  illustrated  b\  Kilburn  and  Rippey  (1982:55, 
fig.  20),  who  recorded  that  it  is  deposited  among  branches 
of  coralline  algae,  and  consists  of  a  gelatinous  mauve 
string.  Their  depiction  of  the  egg  ribbon  shows  that  it  is 
small,  about  10  mm  in  length,  and  contains  few,  mod- 
erately large  eggs.  This  feature,  plus  the  unsculptured 
protoconch,  and  the  patchy,  nearly  disjunct  geographic 
distribution  of  the  species  suggest  a  direct  type  of  de- 
velopment, but  this  needs  confirmation. 

Fossil  records:  This  species  has  been  recorded  from  the 
Pleistocene  of  Somalia  (Abrard,  1942:61,  pi.  6.  fig.  28). 

Geographic  distribution  (figure  45):  Colina  pinguis 
occurs  along  the  eastern  African  coast  from  South  Africa 
north  to  Kenya,  and  then  jumping  north  to  the  Red  Sea, 
the  Gulf  of  Oman,  and  Persian  Gulf,  extending  eastward 
to  Pakistan.  The  single  records  from  Suez  and  the  Persian 
Gulf  need  reconfirmation. 

Specimens  examined:  RED  SEA:  Suez,  Egvpt  (USNM 
23227).  AFFARS  &  ISSAS:  Djibouti  (MNHNP).  OMAN: 
Muscat  (USNM  798223);  Wadi  Haart,  near  Salalah 
(BMNH);  Slud,  near  Salalah  (BMNH).  PERSIAN  GULF 
(MNHNP).  IRAN:  Chah  Bahar  (MNHNP).  PAKISTAN: 
Manani  Rocks,  Karachi  (BMNH).  KENYA:  Mombassa 
(USNM).  SOUTH  AFRICA:  Albany  (USNM  97995);  Port 
Alfred,  Eastern  Cape  (USNM  186801,  DMNH  16073); 
Port  Gonubie  (USNM  845781);  Cape  Natal  (BMNH). 

DISCUSSION 

Shell  Morphology  and  .4natomy:  There  are  several 
notable  diagnostic  shell  features  of  Colina  species.  This 
genus  is  easily  identified  by  its  unusual  fusiform,  fre- 
quentK-  slender,  pupate  shell  ha\ing  inflated  midwhorls 
and  a  highly  constricted  bod\  whorl.  EarK  whorls  are 
concave  in  outline,  while  adult  midwhorls  are  inflated 
and  usually  sculptured  with  large  axial  ribs.  The  bod> 
whorl  is  constricted  and  narrow,  relativel\-  weakK  sculp- 
tured, and  has  an  elongate,  o\ate  aperture.  In  addition, 
the  upper  \\  horls  are  frequently  decollate  and  a  second- 
ary apex  (figures  70-73)  is  added  as  a  plug,  enhancing 
the  pupate  shape. 

The  truncated  apex  is  a  distinctive  feature  of  the  shell 
of  Colina  species,  .\lthough  decollation  and  formation 
of  a  secondary  apex  occurs  in  shells  of  Cerithidea  species, 
family  Potamididae  (Houbrick,  1984),  this  phenomenon 
is  not  seen  in  other  genera  of  the  Cerithiidae  nor  in 
members  of  other  cerithioidean  families. 

The  protoconch  of  Colina  macrostoma  (figure  28)  is 
smooth,  comprises  one  whorl,  and  is  indicative  of  direct 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1990 


Page  49 


development.  It  differs  totally  from  the  elaborately  sculp- 
tured protoconchs  of  litiopids  (see  Houbrick,  1987b:  12, 
figs.  S,  10)  and  is  unlike  those  of  most  Bittium  and  Cer- 
ilhiiim  species  that  have  pelagic  veliger  larvae.  However, 
Cerithium  species  with  direct  development  have  pro- 
toconchs similar  to  those  in  Colina  (see  Hout)rick,  1973; 
1974).  Cossmann's  (1889:61)  assertion  that  the  proto- 
conch  of  Colina  was  unlike  those  of  cerithiids  and  more 
like  those  of  cerithiopsids  such  as  LovcncUa.  is  probably 
due  to  his  mistaken  notion  that  the  secondary  ape.x  of 
decollate  Colina  individuals  (see  figures  70-73)  he  ex- 
amined was  the  real  protoconch. 

EarK  whorls  of  Colina  species  are  sculptured  with 
three  to  four  spiral  cords  (figure  69),  the  two  anterior 
ones  being  strongest.  Kilburn  and  Rippey  (1982:55,  fig. 
19)  noted  that  "Juveniles  resemble  very  narrow,  very 
high-spired  trochids,  with  a  flattened  base  and  short, 
sharp  siphonal  spout."  Immature  Colina  pingttis  shells 
have  a  concave  outline,  and  look  very  much  like  adult 
Trochocerithium  species  (see  Houbrick,  in  press). 

Of  the  three  Colina  species  recognized  herein,  Colina 
pinguis  has  the  largest,  widest  shell  (figures  48-66).  In 
contrast,  Colina  macrostoma  (figures  6-41)  commonly 
is  highly  elongate  and  slender,  some  morphs  attaining 
almost  a  nail-like  shape  (figures  8-10, 14-16, 19-20).  This 
species  also  has  the  most  variable  shell  sculpture  within 
the  genus.  The  shell  of  Colina  selecta  (figures 
46,  47)  has  a  sculpture  that  closely  resembles  Colina 
macrostoma,  but  is  more  finely  cancellate. 

Anatomy:  Most  of  the  anatomical  knowledge  about  Co- 
lina species  has  been  derived  from  an  examination  of 
Colina  pinguis;  thus,  anatomical  characters  may  be  aug- 
mented and/or  redefined  as  the  soft  parts  of  other  species 
become  known. 

Externally,  the  animal  has  an  overall  certithiid  aspect 
and  comprises  about  four  w  horls.  The  visceral  coils  con- 
sist of  a  typical  digestive  gland  and  gonad,  a  stomach 
about  one  whorl  in  length,  and  a  moderately  large  kid- 
ney. The  columellar  muscle  (figure  3,  cm)  is  long  and 
broad,  extending  nearK  two  whorls  in  length,  and  has 
two  deep  anterior  grooves  (figure  3,  cmg)  that  corre- 
spond to  the  columellar  plaits  of  the  shell.  The  long,  broad 
columellar  muscle  seen  in  Colina  species  does  not  occur 
in  Bittium  species  or  in  litiopids.  The  dorsal  mantle  edge 
is  fringed  with  papillae  (figure  2,  mp). 

The  large  foot  has  an  epipodial  skirt  (figure  2,  eps) 
fringed  with  papillae  along  its  lateral  edges  and  has  a 
large,  posterior  papillate  operculiferous  lobe  (figure  1, 
opl),  similar  to  that  seen  in  many  Bittium  species.  The 
operculum  (figure  1,  op)  overlies  the  operculiferous  lobe. 
The  foot  is  probably  longer  and  more  slender  than  de- 
picted in  figure  1,  and  the  epipodial  papillae  more  ten- 
tacular in  living  snails.  The  epipodial  papillae  are  short 
(at  least  in  preserved  specimens),  and  do  not  appear  to 
be  as  elongate  as  in  litiopids.  In  this  respect,  they  are 
more  like  the  epipodial  papillae  observed  in  some  Bit- 
tium species  (Houbrick,  pers  obs. ).  The  operculigerous 
lobe  of  the  posterior  epipodium  of  Colina  species  is  also 


similar  to  that  observed  in  Bittium  species  (see  Marcus 
&  Marcus,  1963:75,  fig.  80;  Houbrick,  pers.  obs.). 

The  propodium  is  crescent  shaped  (figure  1)  and  has 
a  long  papilla  at  each  side  followed  by  the  smaller  pa- 
pillae (figure  1,  p)  of  the  epipodial  skirt.  The  leading 
edge  of  the  propodial  sole  has  a  deep  slit  along  its  leading 
edge  overlain  by  a  thin  propodial  flap  (figures  1,  2,  4,  f). 
This  slit  leads  into  a  large  deep  propodial  mucus  gland 
(figures  1,  4,  pmg)  in  the  front  of  the  foot.  The  mor- 
phology of  the  propodial  mucus  gland  of  Colina  pinguis 
is  nearly  identical  to  that  of  litiopid  and  Bittium  species. 

The  sole  of  the  foot  (figures  1,  3,  s)  is  highly  glandular, 
having  many  transverse  furrows  and  a  deep  longitudinal 
slit  (figures  1,  2,  ms)  beginning  at  the  middle  of  the  foot 
and  extending  back  to  its  posterior  edge.  The  slit  marks 
the  entrance  to  a  massive  metapodial  mucus  gland  (fig- 
ures 2,  3,  mmg)  having  a  large  duct  (figure  3,  d)  that 
extends  deep  into  the  headfoot  to  the  pedal  ganglia. 
Similar  metapodial  mucus  glands  also  occur  in  litiopids 
(see  Houbrick,  1987b:  12,  figs.  7,  12)  and  in  some  Bittium 
species  (Marcus  &  Marcus,  1963:75,  fig.  80;  Houbrick, 
pers.  obs).  In  litiopids  and  in  some  Bittium  species,  this 
gland  produces  a  strong  mucus  thread,  anchoring  the 
animal  to  the  substrate,  as  seen  in  Colina  pinguis.  It  is 
therefore  reasonable  to  infer  that  it  has  the  same  function 
in  other  Colina  species. 

The  ovate,  corneous,  paucispiral  operculum  (figures 
67,  68)  is  similar  to  the  opercula  of  cerithiid  species  such 
as  Bittium  Gray,  Cerithium  Bruguiere,  Ctijpeomorus 
Jousseaume,  Rhinoclavis  Swainson,  and  Pseudovertagus 
Vignal,  differing  only  in  having  a  subterminal  nucleus. 

The  cephalic  tentacles  are  very  fat,  wide,  and  stubby, 
each  bearing  a  large  eye  at  its  peduncular  base.  The 
snout  (figures  1,  2,  sn)  is  short  and  has  a  bilobed  tip. 
Both  the  snout  and  cephalic  tentacles  are  probabK  longer 
in  living  animals. 

The  dorsal  mantle  margin  has  a  double  fringe,  but  is 
smooth  ventrally.  The  upper  dorsal  part  of  the  double 
fringe  is  smooth,  while  the  lower  part  bears  long  papillae. 
This  fringed  dorsal  mantle  edge  occurs  among  all  mem- 
bers of  the  Cerithiidae.  but  is  absent  in  litiopids.  The 
exhalant  siphon  protrudes  slightly,  and  the  dorsal  mantle 
edge  adjacent  to  the  inhalant  siphon  is  marked  by  a  deep, 
left-central  cleft,  which  has  enlarged,  protruded  papillae 
and  a  darkK  pigmented  undersurface. 

The  mantle  ca\  ity  is  deep  and  spacious.  A  ver\-  broad 
bipectinate  osphradium  (figure  5),  comprising  tall  pec- 
tens,  tapers  posteriorly  and  extends  nearly  the  full  length 
of  the  ctenidium.  The  ctenidium  is  as  long  as  the  mantle 
cavity,  twice  as  broad  as  the  osphradium,  and  comprises 
long,  tall  leaflets,  narrow  at  their  left  leading  edges  and 
becoming  long  and  shallow  to  the  right.  The  hypobran- 
chial  gland  is  thick  and  glandular  and  as  broad  as  the 
ctenidium.  The  rectum  is  half  as  wide  as  the  hvpobran- 
chial  gland  and  is  filled  with  many  white,  ovoid  stacked 
fecal  pellets.  The  male  pallial  gonoduct  is  open,  ty  pically 
cerithioid,  and  has  many  transverse  glandular  folds  along 
its  entire  length.  These  probably  comprise  the  prostate 
and  possibly   a  spermatophore  forming  organ,  respec- 


Page  50 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


lively.  No  spermatophores  were  found,  but  as  they  are 
t>pical  of  teritliioideatis.  the\  prohabK  occur  in  this 
group  as  well.  The  fcmaie  paliial  o\ ickKts  are  unknown. 
.■\ltliough  the  nianllc  cavity  organs  of  Colina  pingiiis  are 
t\pically  cerithioid,  the  ver\  broad  bipectinate  osphra- 
dium  is  unusual,  especially  in  such  a  small  snail;  other- 
wise, it  is  typical  of  those  seen  in  Cerithiuni  species 
(Marcus  &  Marcu.s,  1964).  In  litiopids  (Houbrick,  1987b: 
13)  and  some  Bittium  species  (Marcus  &  Marcus,  1963: 
78-79,  fig.  88,  y)  the  osphradium  is  monopectinate,  while 
in  other  Bittium  species  it  is  a  simple  ridge  (Houbrick, 
pers.  obs.).  The  morphology  of  the  ctenidial  filaments  in 
Colina  piiiguis  is  very  similar  to  those  seen  in  litiopid 
and  Bittium  species. 

The  buccal  mass  is  moderately  large,  filling  the  short 
snout.  There  are  two  semilunar  shaped  prismatic  jaws. 
A  pair  of  thin,  tube-like  salivary  glands  coil  tighti\  in 
front  of  the  nerve  ring,  but  extend  through  and  originate 
behind  it.  The  taenioglossate  radula  (figures  42-44  & 
74-76)  of  Colina  species  is  of  moderate  size,  about  one- 
seventh  the  shell  length.  The  rachidian  tooth  is  square, 
having  a  cutting  edge  with  a  large  pointed  central  cusp 
flanked  by  two  blunt  denticles  on  each  side.  The  basal 
plate  of  the  rachidian  tooth  has  a  small  median  posterior 
e.xtension  and  a  weak  raised  fold  at  each  lateral  edge. 
The  lateral  tooth  is  rhomboid-shaped,  having  a  wide, 
posterior  pillar-shaped  extension  on  the  basal  plate  and 
a  moderate  lateral  extension.  The  marginal  teeth  are 
spatulate  with  curved  serrated  tips.  The  shape  and  den- 
tition of  the  rachidian  tooth  of  the  radula  of  Colina 
species  (figures  44,  76)  are  unlike  those  of  litiopids  and 
man\  Bittium  species,  which  have  hourglass-shaped  bas- 
al plates  (see  Houbrick,  1987b:12,  figs.  13-14;  15,  figs. 
18-19;  Marcus  &  Marcus,  1963:75,  fig.  81):  in  Colina 
species,  the  rachidian  is  more  squarish,  as  in  many  Cer- 
it Ilium  species. 

The  stomach  and  anterior  alimentary  tract  of  Colina 
pinguis  are  l\pical  of  cerithiids  and  litiopids.  Immedi- 
ately behind  the  nerve  ring,  the  midesophagus  is  twisted 
and  expands  to  form  a  large  esophageal  gland  whose 
inner  epithelium  is  thrown  into  many  transverse  ridges. 
E.sopliageal  glands  also  occur  in  Cerithiuni.  Clypcomo- 
rua  and  Bittium  species  (Houbrick,  1974,  1985,  in  press) 
and  in  litiopids  (Houbrick,  1987b).  The  posterior  esoph- 
agus is  a  narrow  straight  tube.  The  large  stomach  is  lined 
interiorly  with  many  small  ridges  and  grooves  torming 
complex  sorting  areas.  A  raised  central  pad  divides  the 
sorting  area;  a  cuticular  gastric  shield  and  a  short,  but 
distinct,  style  sac  are  present.  Although  a  crystalline  style 
was  not  observed  in  preserved  specimens,  short  style  sacs 
and  styles  occur  in  Cerithiuni  and  Clypcomorus  species 
(Houbrick,  1985).  Examination  of  fecal  pellet  contents, 
;ind  the  morphology  of  the  radula  and  alimentary  system, 
'  ariiciilariy  the  sorting  surface,  gastric  shield,  and  style 
'  "I  the  stomach,  suggest  that  members  of  this  genus 
'  .i!ii:i. 'uhagous  herbivores. 
I  'i'  nt  r\oii>  system  is  epiathroid.  The  right  cerebral 
aini  I  '.  .r,;il  ganglia  are  closely  joined,  but  there  are  very 
long  M-.  l.io-pcdil  connectives.  The  pedal  ganglia  lie 


deep  in  the  foot,  each  having  a  statocyst  on  its  inner  side. 
The  supraesophageal  connective  is  very  long.  The  gan- 
glia of  the  nervous  system  are  thus  typically  cerithioid 
in  layout,  but  the  long  cerebro-pedal  connectives  are 
notable. 

The  kidney  extends  posteriorly,  about  one-half  of  a 
whorl  in  length.  Only  one  lobe  was  discerned,  and  there 
is  a  large  kidney  opening  into  the  posterior  mantle  cavity. 

Ecology:  Very  little  has  been  recorded  about  the  hab- 
itats and  life  histories  of  Colina  species.  In  the  original 
description  of  the  genus,  H.  &  A.  Adams  (1854:286) 
remarked  that  "The  species  known  are  inhabitants  of 
deep  water,  living  in  coarse  sand.  ..."  This  statement 
appears  to  be  erroneous,  as  museum  records  of  all  species 
examined  cite  intertidal  to  shallow  subtidal  habitats.  The 
few  data  available  from  collection  records  indicate  that 
Colina  species  are  closely  associated  with  weedy  or  algal 
substrates. 

Colina  species  appear  to  use  a  thread  of  mucus  pro- 
duced by  the  large  metapodial  mucus  gland  to  anchor 
themselves  to  their  algal  substrate  in  much  the  same  way 
that  litiopids  (Houbrick  19S7b:ll)  and  some  Bittium 
species  do  (Houbrick,  pers.  obs).  This  phenomenon  has 
been  observed  by  Kilburn  and  Rippey  (1982:55).  who 
recorded  that  Colina  pinguis  ".  .  .  anchors  itseli  with 
elastic  threads." 

Conclusions:  Colina  is  not  a  speciose  genus  and  does 
not  have  an  extensive  fossil  record,  only  one  Pleistocene 
record  being  recorded  (Abrard,  1942:61).  Although  some 
external  anatomical  characters  such  as  the  epipodial  skirt 
fringed  with  papillae,  a  large  papillate  operculiferous 
lobe,  and  deep  propodial  and  mesopodial  mucus  glands 
are  similar  to  those  seen  in  species  of  Alaba  H.  &  A. 
Adams  1853,  and  Litiopa  Rang,  1829,  family  Litiopidae 
(see  Houbrick,  1987b),  the  combination  of  shell  and  other 
anatomical  features  are  more  like  those  observed  in 
members  of  the  Cerithiidae,  especialK'  in  Bittium  species. 
Iri  addition,  some  Bittium  species  have  a  mesopodial 
mucus  gland.  These  include  a  shell  with  a  distinct  si- 
phonal  canal  and  a  protoconch  similar  to  those  Bittium, 
Cerithiuni.  and  Clypcomorus  species  with  direct  de\el- 
opment.  The  attached  surface  of  the  operculum  of  Col- 
ina (Figure  67)  does  not  have  the  spiral  ridge  seen  in 
litiopid  species  (see  Houbrick,  1987b:10,  fig.  1),  but  is 
more  like  those  of  the  cerithiids  (see  Houbrick,  1974; 
1985).  Other  anatomical  characters  of  Colina.  absent  in 
litiopids,  include  the  fringed  papillate  dorsal  mantle  edge, 
a  long  broad  columellar  mu.scle,  short,  fat  cephalic  ten- 
tacles (which  may  be  artifactual),  a  squarish  rachidian 
tooth,  and  coiled  sali\ary  glands  (straight  tubes  in  litiop- 
ids). With  the  exception  of  the  long,  broad  columellar 
muscle  and  short,  fat,  cephalic  tentacles,  these  characters 
are  present  in  Bittium.  Cerithiuni.  and  Clypcomorus 
s|)ecies. 

.•\s  the  temale  paliial  oN-iduct  anatomy  of  Colina  is 
unknown,  comparison  of  paliial  oviducts  of  cerithiid  gen- 
era thought  to  be  closely  related  to  it  is  not  possible. 
Ne\crtlieless,  the  known  shell,  radular.  and  anatomical 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1990 


Page  51 


cliaracters  of  Colina  species  clearly  suggest  an  assign- 
ment of  this  genus  to  the  Cerithiidae,  subfamiK  Ceri- 
thiinae  Ferussac,  1819,  close  to  the  general  Bittium  Gra%', 
1847,  Cerithium  Bruguiere,  1789,  and  Clypeomorus 
Jousseaume,  1888.  As  more  knowledge  of  the  smaller- 
sized  and  obscure  cerithiid  genera  is  accumulaletl,  these 
data,  along  with  those  from  Colina.  can  be  utilized  in  a 
more  complete  cerithioidean  ph\logenetic  analysis  (see 
Houbrick,  1988).  Only  then  will  the  generic  relationships 
become  clearer  and  have  a  more  substantial  basis. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

For  loans  of  types  and  specimens  I  thank  the  curators 
and  collection  managers  of  the  follow  ing  museums:  Dr. 
Riidiger  Bieler  (DMNH),  Dr.  Philippe  Bouchet 
(MNHNP),  Dr.  George  Davis  (ANSP),  Mr,  Ian  Loch 
(AMS),  Dr.  James  McLean  (LACM),  Dr.  Richard  Petit 
(Manchester  Museum),  Ms.  Alison  Trevv  (NMW),  Ms. 
Kathie  Way  (BMNH),  Dr.  Fred  Wells  (WAM).  I  thank 
Mr.  Victor  Krantz,  Smithsonian  Photographic  Services. 
The  Smithsonian  Scanning  Electron  Microscope  Labo- 
ratory assisted  w  ith  preparations  of  micrographs.  I  am 
grateful  to  Ms.  Shelley  Greenhouse  for  checking  the  orig- 
inal draft  of  this  manuscript  for  errors. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Abrard,  R.  1942.  Mojlusques  Pleistocenes  de  la  Cote  Fran(,'aise 
des  Somalis  recueillis  par  E.  .Hubert  de  la  Rue.  Archives 
du  Museum  National  d'Histoire  Naturelle,  6me  serie  18: 
105  p.,  8  pis. 

Adams,  A.  1853.  Description  of  new  species  of  shells,  in  the 
collection  of  Hugh  Cuming,  Esq.  Proceedings  of  the  Zoo- 
logical Society  of  London,  Part  21  173- 176,  pi.  20 

Adams,  A.  1854.  A  monograph  of  Cerithidca.  a  genus  of 
Mollusca,  with  descriptions  of  several  new  species,  from 
the  collection  of  Hugh  C^uming,  Esq.:  to  which  are  adiled 
two  new  species  of  Colina,  and  one  of  Donax.  Proceedings 
of  the  Zoological  Society  of  London,  Part  22:83-87, 

Adams,  A.  1853-1855.  The  genera  of  Recent  Mollu,sca  1(1- 
8):l-256(1853);l(9-15):2.57-484(1854);2(19-24):93-284 
(1855).  London. 

.^dams,  H.  1866,  Descriptions  of  a  new  genus  and  a  new 
species  of  niollusks.  Proceedings  of  the  Zoological  Society 
of  London,  1866,  p,  150-151. 

Adams,  H.  1867,  Descriptions  of  new  species  of  shells.  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Zoological  Societ\  of  London.  1867.  p. 
307-309,  pi.  19,  fig.  20. 

Adams,  H.  and  A.  Adams.  1853-1858.  The  genera  of  Recent 
Mollusca;  arranged  according  to  their  organization  3  \ols 
London,  389  p.,  138  pis. 

Bayle,  E.  1880.  Liste  rectificative  de  quelques  nonis  de  genres 
et  d'especes.  Journal  de  Conch\liologie  28(3):240-251, 

Bellardi,  L.  1850.  Raisonne  des  fossiles  nunnnuliti(|ues  du 
Conte  de  Nice.  Memoirs  de  la  Societe  Geologique  de  France 
(serie  2)  4:205-300,  pis. 

Bosch,  D.  and  E.  Bosch.  1982.  Seashells  of  Oman.  Longmans, 
New  York,  206  p.,  illustrated. 

Bruguiere,  J.  G.  1789,  1792.  Encyclopedic  methodique:  his- 
toire  naturelle  des  vers.  l(l):l-344  (1789);  l(l):345-758 
(1792). 


('oinad,  T.  .\,  I  S6()  Ocsrriptinusol  new  spccii-s  of  Cretaceous 
and  Eocene  fossils  of  Mi.ssissippi  and  Alaliarna,  Journal  of 
the  .\cadem\  of  Natural  Sciences,  Philadeiplii.i  (series  2) 
4:275-298,  pis.  46-47, 

Cossmann,  M.  1889.  Catalogue  illu.slre  des  eociuilles  iossiles 
de  I'Eocene  des  environs  de  Paris  Societe  Ro\ale  Mala- 
cologique  de  Belgique,  Part  4:380  p  ,  12  pis 

Cossmann,  M.  1906.  Essais  de  paleoconchologie  comparee, 
X'olume  7,  Paris,  261  p.,  14  pis. 

Delrance,  \!  J  L  1816-18.30.  Dietionnaire  des  sciences  iia- 
turelles.  .  .  .  Paris.  60  vols 

Ferrussac,  J,  B.  L.  d'A  de.     1819,    Histoire  naturelle  general  et 
particulire  des  mollusques  terrestres  et  flu\iatiles.  \ol,   1 
Paris.  (1-28):  128  p.,  162  pis. 

Fischer,  P,  1880-1887.  Manuel  de  conchyliologie  el  de  pa- 
leontologie  conein  liologique  ou  histoire  naturelle  des 
mollusques  rivants  et  fossiles.  Paris,  .\.\iv  +  1369  p.,  23 
pis.  (F"ascicule  6,  p,  513-608,  1883;  fascicule  7.  p,  609- 
688,  1884), 

Goldfuss,  G,  .\..  von.  1820,  Handhuch  der  Zoologie  2,  N'urn- 
berg 

Ciray,  J.  E.  1847.  The  classification  of  the  British  Mollusca  h\ 
N.  E.  Leach,  M  D  .Annals  and  Magazine  of  Natural  His- 
tor\  20:267-273, 

Hinds,  R,  B,  1844,  Zoology  of  the  voyage  of  HM.S.  Sulphur, 
under  the  command  of  Capt.  Sir  Edw.  Belcher,  during 
the  vears  1836-42,  X'olume  2.  Mollusca.  London,  72  p..  21 
pls.^ 

Houbrick,  R.  S,  1973.  Studies  on  the  reproductiw  l)iology  of 
the  genus  Cerithium  (Gastropoda:  Prosobranchia)  in  the 
western  Atlantic,  Bulletin  of  Marine  Science  23:875-904, 

Houbrick,  R,  S,  1974.  The  genus  Cerithium  in  the  western 
Atlantic.  Johnsonia  5(50):33-S4,  pis.  13-48. 

Houbrick,  R.  S.  1984.  Revision  of  higher  ta.\a  in  genus  Cer- 
ithidea  (Mesogastropoda:  Potamididae)  based  on  compar- 
ati\e  morphology  and  biological  data.  .American  Mala- 
cological  Bulletin  2:1-20 

Houbrick,  R,  S,  1985.  Genus  C7i/pcr;f?if;r(/.s  Jousseaume  i(!er- 
ithiidae:  Prosobranchia).  Smithsonian  C'ontributions  to  Zo- 
ology, No,  403:iii  +  131  p,,  62  figs, 

Houbrick,  R,  S,  1987a.  Description  of  a  new  giant  Ataxoeer- 
ithium  species  from  Australia  with  remarks  on  the  system- 
atic placement  of  the  genus  (Prosobranchia:  Cerithiopsi- 
dae).  The  Nautilis  101(4):155-161, 

Houbrick,  R,  S,  1987b,  Anatomy  of  Alalia  and  Litiopa  (Pro- 
sobranchia: Litiopidae),  The  Nautilis  101(1):9-18, 

Houbrick,  R,  S,  1988,  Cerithioidean  ph\logen\,  Malacolog- 
ical  Review,  Supplement  4:88-128, 

Houbrick,  R  S.  1989,  C'ampanile  resisited:  implications  for 
cerithioidean  phvlogen\  ,\merican  Malacological  Bulletin 
7(l):l-6. 

Houbrick,  R.  S.  (in  press).  Monograph  of  the  genus  Cerithium 
Bruguiere  in  the  Indo-Pacific  (Cerithiidae;  Prosobranchia). 
Smithsonian  (Contributions  to  Zoologv. 

international  C'ode  ol  Zoological  Nomenclature  [IGZN],  1985, 
Third  edition.  Ride,  WD,  L,  C  W  Sabrosk\ .  G  Bernardi, 
and  R  \'  Mel\ille(eds.).  International  Trust  for  Zoological 
Nomenclature,  London  xx  -i-  338  p. 

Jablonski,  D.  and  R.  A.  Lutz.  1980.  Molluscan  larval  shell 
morphology:  ecological  and  paleonlological  applications. 
In:  Rhoads,  D.  C.  and  R.  .\.  Lutz  (eds. ).  Skeletal  growth 
of  aquatic  organisms.  Plenum,  New  York,  p.  323-377. 

Jousseaume,  F.  1888.  Description  des  mollusques  recueilles 
par  le  Dr.  Faurot  dans  la  Mer  Rouge  et  la  (;olfe  d'.Xden 
Memoirs  de  la  Societe  Zoologique  de  F'rance  1(2):  12-223 


Page  52 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


Jousseaume,  F.     1930.    CA-rilhiidae  de  la  Mcr  Rouge.  Journal 

de  C^onchyliologie  7-1:270-296 
Kilburn,  R.  and  E.  R.  Rippey      1982     Sea  shells  of  soutliein 

Africa.  Hong  Kong,  249  p  ,  46  pis. 
Marcus  E.  and  E.  Marcus.     1963.    Mesogastropodeii  von  der 

Kuste  Sao  Paulos.  .Ahhandiungen  der  Matiieniatiscli-Na- 

turwissenshaftliclien  Klasse  Jalirgang  1963,  1:1-105. 
Marcus,  E.  and  E.   Marcus.     1964.     On  Cerithium  atratum 

(Born,  177S)(Gastropoda:  Pro.sobrancliia)   Bulletin  ot  Ma- 
rine Science  of  the  (iult  and  (;aribl)ean   14(3):494-510. 

figs.  1-12. 
Marshall,  B.  A.     1980.     The  systematic  positioti  of   Trifuris 

Deshayes  (Mollusca:  Clastropoda),  New  Zealand  Journal  of 

Zoology  7:85-88. 
Melvill,  J.  C.  and  R.  Standen.    1898.    The  marine  Mollusca  ot 

Madras  and  the  immediate  neighbourhooil.  Journal  ot 

Conchology  9:30-48.  pi.  1, 
Nuttall,  T.    1832.    A  manual  of  the  Ornithologv  of  the  Ignited 

States  and  Canada,  the  land  liirils.  1st  ed   C'ainhridge.  viii 

+  683  p. 
Quoy,  J.  C.  R    and  J    V.  Gaimard.     1833,  1834.     Voyage  de 

decouverts  de  1  Astrolabe  execute  par  ordre  du  Roi  pendent 

les  annees  1826-1827-1828-1829  sous  le  commandement 

de  M.  J.  d'L'rville.  Zoologie  3(l):l-366  (1834)   +   Atlas 

(1833),  93  pis. 
Rang,  P.  S.    1829.    Notice  sur  le  Litiope.  Liliopa,  genre  nou- 

veau  de  MoUusques  gasteropdes,  .Annales  des  Sciences  Na- 

turelles  16(3):303-307. 
Robertson,  R.     1974.    Marine  prosobranch  gastropods:  larval 

studies  and  systematics.  Thalassiajugoslavica  10(1-2):213- 

238. 
Sars,  G.  O.     1878.    15idrag  til  Kundskaben  om  Norges  Arktiske 

Fauna.  1.  Vlollusca  regionis  .^rticae  Norvegiae  (^ristiania, 

466  p.,  18  pis. 
Schumacher,  C.  A.     1817.     Essai  dune  nouveau  septeme  des 

habitations  des  vers  testaces.  Copenhagen,  287  p.,  22  pis. 


Smith,  E  A.  1884.  Mollusca  (p,  34-116.  pis  4-7)  in  Report 
on  the  zoological  collections  made  in  the  Indo-Pacilic  Ocean 
during  the  voyage  of  H.M  S  ".Alert"  1881-82  London, 
684  p.,  54  pis. 

Smvthe,  K.,  ed.  1982.  Sea  shells  ol  the  .\rabian  Gulf  London, 
'  123  p.,  20  pis. 

.Sowerby,  G.  B.  1855,  1866.  Monograph  of  the  genus  Ceri- 
thitnn.  .Adanson.  /;i:  Thesaurus  Conchvliorum,  or  Mono- 
graphs of  Genera  ot  Shells.  London  2(16):847-899,  pis. 
176-186.  [pi.  12,  published  as  a  supplement  in  1866]. 

Sowerby,  G.  B.  1865-1866.  Monograph  of  the  Genus  Ceri- 
thium, .\danson.  In:  L.  A  Reeve,  Conchologia  Iconica:  or 
illustrations  of  molluscous  animals.  London,  15  [atlas],  20 
pis.  +  index. 

Tate,  R.  1894.  L'nrecorded  genera  of  the  older  Tertiar\  fauna 
of  Australia,  including  diagnosis  of  some  new  genera  and 
species.  Journal  of  the  Ro\al  Societv  of  New  South  Wales 
27:1(57-198,  pis.  10-13. 

Thiele,  J  1929  Handbuch  der  systematischen  Weichtier- 
kunde.  liand  1,  Teil  1,  Jena,  376  p.,  470  figs. 

Tryon,  G.  W.  1883.  Structural  and  systematic  conchology:  an 
introduction  to  the  stud\'  of  Mollusca,  Vol  2.  Philadelphia, 
430  p.,  22  pis. 

Tryon,  G.  W.,  Jr.  1887.  Orithiidae.  in  Manual  of  conchology; 
structural  and  systematic  with  illustrations  of  the  species, 
first  series.  Philadelphia,  9:112-228  p.,  19-39  pis, 

\'errill,  A.  E.  1882.  C^atalogue  of  marine  Mollusca  added  to 
the  fauna  of  New  England  during  the  past  ten  years. 
Transactions  of  the  C^onnecticut  Academv  5:447-.587,  pis. 
17-19,  57-58. 

Wenz,  \V.  1928-1944.  Gastropoda.  Teil  1:  Allgemeiner  Teil 
und  Prosobranchia.  In:  O.  H.  Schindewolf  (ed. ).  Handbuch 
der  Paliizoologie.  Berlin  6:  \i  -I-   1,639  p.  4,211  figs. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(2):53-56,  1990 


Page  53 


Two  Unusual  Gastropods  From  Late  Pliocene  Lakes  in  Northeast 
Nebraska 


Harold  C.  Pierce 

Research  Associate 

University  of  Nebraska  State  Museum 

Lincoln,  NE  68688,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Lyninaca  {Acella)  haldanani  Binney  1867  and  Acroloxus colo- 
radoensis  (Henderson  1930),  rare  as  living  species  and  unusual 
as  fossils,  are  found  in  a  late  Pliocene  lacustrine  assemblage  in 
northeast  Nebraska  in  association  with  two  extinct  taxa,  Ont- 
alodiscus  paltersoni  (F.  C.  Baker,  1938)  and  Deroceras  aenig- 
ma,  Leonard  19,50.  Climatic  interpretation,  based  on  the  re- 
maining mollu,scan  fauna,  suggest  the  late  Pliocene  climate, 
immediately  preceeding  the  first  glacial  advance,  approximat- 
ed that  of  the  present. 


curring  during  pluvial  intervals  on  the  High  Plains,  sug- 
gesting additional  investigations  involving  other  known 
fossiliferous  deposits  in  the  immediate  area.  A  second 
locality,  some  6.5  kilometers  (4  s.m.)  north  of  the  Clark 
Mills  Locality,  the  Niekles  Gravel  Pit,  UNSM  KX  109 
(Figure  1),  was  sampled,  largely  on  the  report  of  a  late 
Blancan  microvertebrate  fauna,  an  associated  ash,  and 
an  overlying  till  (Voorhies,  pers.  comm.).  Samples  pro- 
cessed from  this  locality  produced  a  second  molluskan 
fauna,  w  hich  matched  verv  well  the  Clark  Mills  fauna. 


During  the  1988  field  season.  Dr.  K.  G.  Goodwui,  De- 
partment of  Geology,  Llniversity  of  Nebraska-Lincoln, 
discovered  fossiliferous  lacustrine  sediments  in  Knox 
County,  Nebraska  associated  with  a  volcanic  ash  and 
underlying  a  glacial  till.  Dr.  M.  R.  Voorhies,  Curator  of 
Vertebrate  Paleontology,  University  of  Nebraska  State 
Museum,  quarried  and  processed  approximately  one 
metric  ton  of  sediment  from  the  locality  now  known  as 
the  Clark  Mills  Local  Fauna,  UNSM  KX  143  (figure  1). 
Mammals  recovered  indicated  a  late  Blancan  age  (2.0- 
2.5  MA)  for  the  fauna,  and  paleomagnetic  analyses  in- 
dicate that  the  sediments  were  deposited  in  a  reversed 
magnetic  field  (Matuyama  Reversed  Epoch)  (Voorhies 
&  Goodwin,  1989).  On  this  basis,  the  ash  is  identified  as 
Pearlette  Type  B,  fission-track  dated  at  1.97  MA  (Boells- 
dorf,  1973:39),  hence,  of  late  Pliocene  age. 

In  addition  to  the  mammals,  an  unusually  diverse  fish 
fauna  was  recovered,  to  include  such  northern  species  as 
walleye  {Stizostedion  vitrettm),  northern  pike  (Esox,  cf. 
£.  luciiis),  muskellunge  (Esox.  cf.  £.  masqitinongij),  and 
an  undetermined  trout  (Salmonidae,  Gen.  et  sp.  indet.) 
(Voorhies,  pers.  comm).  The  mollusks  recovered  while 
sorting  for  vertebrates  were  given  to  me  for  study.  Fur- 
ther collection  of  material  from  this  locality  in  1989, 
collected  at  controlled  stratigraphic  intervals,  was  pro- 
cessed specifically  for  mollusks  and  ostracods.  The  larger 
gastropods  were  somewhat  crushed,  but  all  taxa  were 
identifiable  with  confidence.  A  generally  typical  cool 
water  fauna  was  identified,  suggesting  that  cool,  pluvial 
conditions  existed  at  time  of  deposition  (table  1)  This 
fauna  differed  from  the  typical  Pleistocene  faunas  oc- 


•SD 


BROWN 


"^ 

v.. 

J 

r-^ 

^KX  109 

• 

.'-KX  14  3 

K 

N 

0 

X 

Figure  1  Locality  map  of  C:lark  Nhlls  Locality  (KX  1-43), 
NIckles  Pit  Locality  (KX  109),  l)oth  Knox  County,  Nebraska, 
and  Sand  Draw  Locality  (SU),  Brown  Counts,  Nebraska. 


Page  54 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


Table  1.  Comparison  of  faunas  of  the  Clark  Mills  Locality  (KX  143),  Nickles  Pit  Locality  (KX  109)  and  Sand  Draw  Locality  6. 
Frequency  data:  VR  =  1;  R  =  2-5;  F  =  6-1.5;  C  =  16-50;  A  =  51-200;  VA  =  >200.  X  =  Reported  b\  Taylor,  1960,  from  Sand 
Draw,  but  not  his  complete  list   *  =  Extinct  taxa,  or  taxa  not  known  with  certainty  to  still  exist  locally 


I'auiuil  list 


KX  113 


Lower 


Up  pel 


KX  109 


Sand  Draw 


\'alvatidae 

Valvata  lewisi  Curier  1868 
v.  Iricarinata  (Say  1817) 

Planorhidae 
Cijraidus  parvus  (Say  1817) 
I'ronu'netiis  cxacuous  (Say  1821) 
P.  nmhilicatellus  (Cockerell  1887) 
Omalodiscus  pattersoni  (F.  (;.  Baker  1938)* 
Planorlnda  annigera  (Say  1818) 
Planorbella  trivolvis  (Say  1817) 
//.  anceps  (Menke  1830) 

L\  iMiiaeidae 
Lyninaea  hiirnilis  Say  1822 
L.  palustris  (Muller  1774) 
/..  hnlitnoUlcs  Lea  1841  (?) 
/.    Imlclciiiuni  Binney  1867* 

Pii\si(iae 
Phijsclla  gyrina  Say  1821 
P.  sp.  ianalina'i') 
Phijsa  jcnncs.si  skinncri  (Taylor  1954)* 

Ancylidac 

Acroloxus  coloradocnsis  (Hend.  1930)* 
Fcrrissia  mci'kiaiui  (Stimpson  1863)* 

Carscliiidae 

(■/irychiiau  cxigiiiiiu  (Say  1822) 
Liinacidac 

Dcrocrras  acnignia  Leonard  1950* 
Cen.  &  sp.  indet. 

Succineidae 
cf.  Sticcinea 
Oxyloma  sp. 

Pupillidae 
Caslrocopta  pcniodun  (Say  1821) 
G.  armifera  (Say  1821)  ' ablrreviata 
G.  contracta  (Say  1822) 
C.  holzingeri  (Sterki  1889) 
Vertigo  nvata  Sa\   1822 
V.  mdium  ((Jould  1840) 
Pupilla  museorum  (Liim.  1758)* 
Pnpoidi's  allrilabris  (C.  B.  Adams  1841) 

\  allnniidae 
Vallonia  pidrhclla  (Muller  1774) 
\'.  parvula  Sterki  1893 

/nnitidae 

Haiiiiiia  mmusctda  (Binney  1840) 

1-  in'odiiiilidae 

ililiroihsciis  .•iinglpyamis  (Pilsliry  1890) 


Gastropods 
Aquatic 

F 
C 


A 
C 


R 
C 


R 

R 
VR 


Terrestrial 


R 
R 


VR 


R 
F 
F 

VA 
C 


F 
R 


VR 


A 
A 
C 

VA 

C 

R 

C 
F 

R 


C 
R 
R 

F 
R 


A 
R 


A 

A 

VA 

C 

X 

X 


A 
C 


F 
X 
F 

X 
X 


R 

F 

R 

F 

X 

F 

C 

F 

R 

R 

\'R 

R 

R 

F 

\H 

R 

\R 

F 

\R 

X 

R 

F 

R 

H 

X 

H.  G.  Pierce,  1990 


Page  55 


Table   I .     (  'iintiriurd 


FauMul  list 


K.\  143 


l.uuer 


Ippt-r 


K\  109  Sand  Drav 


Bivalves 


Uninnidae 
Gen.  &  sp.  indet, 

Spliaeriidae 
Pisidium.  cf.  P.  ualkcri  Sterki 
P..  cf.  P.  ventrkusuni  Prime  1 
Sphaeritim  partumeium  (Say 
S.,  cf.  S.  simile  (Say  1816) 

Ostracodes 

Large  candnnid 

Plant 
Cliara  sp,,  oogonia 
Rhus  sp.,  sumac  nutlets 
C'cltis  sp  ,  liackherr\  nutlets 


1895 
851 
1822) 


A 
C 
F 


A 
C 

C 
VA 

F 


F 

VR 


VR 

C 
C 

A 

F 
F 


and  included  a  good  sampling  of  the  terrestrial  gastro- 
pods that  were  poorly  represented  in  the  Clark  Mills 
fauna.  Table  1  compares  these  two  faunas  and  a  fauna 
collected  at  Taylor's  (1960:34)  Sand  Draw  Locality  6, 
Brown  County  Nebraska,  which  is  supplemented  by  oth- 
er taxa  reported  by  Taylor  from  Sand  Draw  Localities. 

Two  unusual  gastropod  species  make  the  Knox  County 
faunas  remarkable.  The  fauna  of  the  oldest  lacustrine 
section  at  the  Clark  Mills  Locality,  beneath  the  ash,  in- 
cluded three  incomplete  (2.5-4  whorls),  but  readiK  iden- 
tifiable Lymnaea  (Acella)  haldemani  Binney,  1867  (fig- 
ure 2)  and  eleven  Acroloxus  coloradoensis  (Henderson, 
1930)  (figures  3,  4).  Although  no  L.  haldemani  were 
recovered  at  the  Nickles  Pit  Locality,  that  fauna  did 
include  A.  coloradoensis.  Two  extinct  species  were  also 
found,  Omalodiscus  pattersoni  (F.  C.  Baker  1938),  re- 
covered only  at  the  Clark  Mills  locality,  and  Deroceras 
aenignia  Leonard  1950,  found  at  both  localities.  For  L. 
haldemani,  this  represents  a  considerable  extension  in 
range,  both  geographic  and  stratigraphic.  Records  of  liv- 
ing specimens  are  restricted  to  the  Great  Lakes  drainages 
and  the  Hudson  River  system  (F.  C.  Baker,  1928:270; 
LaRocque,  1968:456).  Fossil  occurrences  have  been  un- 
common, restricted  to  latest  Pleistocene  (Wisconsinan) 
of  Ohio  (LaRocque,  1968:456),  and  from  two  medial 
Pleistocene  (Illinoian)  localities  in  Illinois  (Leonard  et  al.. 
1971:6).  Acroloxus  coloradoensis  is  even  less  common, 
currently  known  to  exist  only  in  a  very  few  lakes  of  river 
systems  tributary  to  the  Arctic  Ocean  or  Hudson  Ba\ 
(Clarke,  1973:263:  Mozley,  1926:56),  and  in  a  remote 
mountain  lake  in  Colorado  (Walker,  1925:1).  Fossil  oc- 
currences are  only  two,  the  Sand  Draw  Local  Fauna, 
Brown  County,  Nebraska,  and  the  Dixon  Local  Fauna, 
Kingman  County,  Kansas  (Taylor,  1960:32-40),  both  of 
late  Pliocene  age  (late  Blancan,  2.2-3.0  MA). 

Comparison  of  the  faunas  of  these  two  Knox  County 
localities  with  nearb\'  modern  faunas  is  most  instructi\e. 


With  the  exception  of  the  four  aforementioned  species, 
over  90%  of  the  mollusks  listed  in  table  1  are  currently 
found  living  within  an  approximately  160  kilometers 
(100  s.m.)  radius  in  northeastern  Nebraska,  southeastern 
South  Dakota,  southwestern  Minnesota  or  northwestern 
Iowa.  The  two  trees  and  the  fish  are  also  found  locally, 
or  within  a  similar  radius.  It  can,  therefore,  be  inferred 
that  the  climate  of  northeast  Nebraska  during  the  late 
Pliocene,  immediately  preceding  the  first  glacial  ad- 
vance, was  quite  similar  to,  but  slightly  cooler  than,  that 
of  today.  The  presence  of  lakes  in  an  area  presently 
lacking  lakes  suggests  either  greater  annual  precipitation, 
or  lessened  evaporation  due  to  cooler  summer  maximum 
temperatures. 


Figures  2-4  Unusual  Gastropods  from  the  late  Pliocene  of 
northeastern  Nebraska.  2  Lymnaea  (Acella)  haldemani.  K\- 
14:5.  aperture  hroken  back  about  '/2  whorl;  3-4.  Acroloxus  colo- 
radoensis. broken  specimens,  3,  KX-143,  4.  KX-109,  All  lOx, 


Page  56 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Baker,  F.  C.  1928.  The  frt'sli  water  Mnllusca  of  Wi.scoiisiii, 
Part  1.  CJa.strnpoda  Wiseonsin  Geological  and  Natural  His- 
tory Sarve\  Bulletin  70,  Part  1.  507  p 

Baker,  F.  C.  1938.  New  land  and  freshwater  Mollusca  from 
the  upper  Pliocene  of  Kansas  and  a  new  species  of  Gy- 
raulus  from  early  Pleistocene  strata.  Nautilus  .51:126-131. 

Biiinev,  VV.  G.  1867.  Notes surquelquesespecesdemollusques 
Quviatiles  de  I'Amerique  du  Nord.  Journal  Conchliologie 
15:-427-132. 

Boellsdorf,  J.  1930.  Fission-track  ages  of  Pleistocene  volcanic 
ash  deposits  in  the  Gentral  Plains,  U.S.A.  Isocliron/West 
8.39-42. 

Clarke,  A.  H  1973.  The  freshwater  mollusks  of  the  C'anadian 
interior  basin.  Vlalacologia  13(1-2)  :l-509 

Henderson,  J.  1930.  Ancyhis  coloradoensis,  new  name  for  A. 
hendersuni  Walker,  1925,  not  1908.  Nautilus  44:31. 

LaRocque,  A.  1968.  Pleistocene  Mollusca  of  Ohio.  Ohio  Di- 
vision of  Geological  Surve\  Bulletin  62.  Part  3  pp.  357- 
553. 


Leonard,  .\.  B.  1950.  .■^  Varrnouthian  molluscan  fauna  in  the 
Midcontinent  region  of  the  L'nited  States.  University  of 
Kansas  Paleontological  Contributions,  Article  3,  48  p. 

LeonartI,  \  B  ,  J  C.  F'r\e,  and  \V.  H.  Johnson  1971  lllinoian 
and  Kansas  molluscan  faunas  of  Illinois.  Illinois  State  Geo- 
logical Survey  (^iircular  461,  24  p. 

Mozley,  A.  1926.  Preliminary  list  of  the  Mollusca  of  Jasper 
Park,  Alberta.  Nautilus  40:53-56. 

Ta\lor.  D.  W.  1960.  Late  Cenozoic  molluscan  faunas  of  the 
High  Plains.  U.S.  Geological  Survev  Professional  Paper 
337,  94  p.,  4  pi 

N'oorhies,  M.  R  and  R.  G.  Goodwin  1989  Plio-Pleistocene 
glacial  deposits  of  northeastern  Nebraska:  new  exposures 
and  interpretations.  Nebraska  Geological  Societ) .  no  pagi- 
nation. 

Walker,  B.  1925.  New  species  of  North  American  .\nclyidae 
and  Lancidae.  University  of  Michigan  Museum  of  Zoology 
Occasional  Paper  164,  13  p 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(2):57-71,  1990 


Page  57 


A  New  Molluscan  Faunule  from  the 
Caribbean  Coast  of  Panama 


Edward  J.  Petuch 

Department  of  Geology 
Florida  Atlantic  University 
Boca  Raton,  FL  33431,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

The  Carribbean  coast  of  Panama,  particularK  the  area  aroumi 
the  San  Bias  Archipelago,  has  been  iound  to  represent  part  ot 
a  new  subregion  of  the  Caribbean  Molluscan  Pro\ince,  antl 
harbors  an  endemic  gastropod  fauna.  This  new  faunal  di\ision, 
referred  to  here  as  the  Blasian  Subregion  (for  the  San  Bias 
Archipelago),  characteristically  contains  a  large  number  of  Pan- 
amic-Caribbean  cognate  species  pairs,  and  has  a  distinctive 
Panamic  appearance.  Being  predominantK  a  coralline  area  in 
an  otherwise  muddy  region  of  the  Caribbean,  the  Blasian  Subre- 
gion also  contains  numerous  taxa  that  are  closeK  related  to 
coral  reef-dwelling  species  from  the  Bahamas  and  Florida.  The 
Blasian  Subregion  ends  abrupth  at  the  Golfo  de  Uraba,  on  the 
Panama-Colombia  l)order  and,  based  on  peripheral  data,  ma\ 
extend  northward  to  the  Costa  Rica-Nicaragua  border.  Si.xteen 
new  Blasian  species  are  described,  including  TurrilcUa  mart- 
anopsis  n.sp.,  Chicoreus  hilli  n.sp.,  Dcrmomurcx  (Trialatella) 
cuna  n.sp.,  Murexiella  edivardpauli  n.sp.,  Latirus  cuna  n.sp., 
Mitra  {Nebularia)  leonardi  n.sp.,  Prunum  leonardhilh  n.sp., 
Valuta  lacertina  n.sp.,  Fahihjria  crnesti  n.sp.,  Contis  brun- 
ncofilaris  n.sp.,  Conus  ernesti  n  sp.,  Conus  hilli  n.sp  ,  Conus 
porlobeloensis  n.sp..  Conns  rosemanjae  n.sp,,  Fusiturricula 
sundcrlandi  n.sp.,  and  Kncfcistia  hilli  n.sp.,  and  three  new 
Blasian  subspecies  are  described,  including  Mitrcx  ruhidus  pan- 
amicwi  n.subsp.,  Oliva  (Strephona)  relindaris  ernesti  n  subsp,. 
and  Conus  granarius  panamicus  n.subsp. 

Key  ivords:  Caribbean;  Panama;  gastropods,  San  Bias  Archi- 
pelago. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  southern  Caribbean  region  contains  one  of  the  least 
studied  molluscan  faunas  in  the  Recent  western  Atlantic 
Although  originalK  thought  to  house  a  typical  Caribbean 
tropical  molluscan  fauna  (Valentine,  1973:356),  the 
coastlines  of  eastern  Central  America  and  northern  South 
America  are  now  known  to  harbor  geographically  dis- 
crete faunules,  each  differing  from  one  another  in  species 
composition  (Petuch,  19SS).  Two  of  these  faunules,  one 
along  northern  Honduras  and  eastern  Nicaragua,  and 
the  other  along  northern  Colombia  and  the  Gulf  of  Ven- 
ezuela, were  found  to  contain  numerous  living  archaic 
genera   and    species   complexes    that    pre\iousl\    were 


thought  to  have  been  extinct  since  the  late  Pliocene 
(Petuch,  1980,  1981,  1982).  These  geographically  sharp- 
ly-defined pockets,  each  with  its  own  characteristic  mol- 
luscan assemblage,  demonstrate  that  the  southern  Carib- 
bean is  not  a  faimistically  homogeneous  region  but  is, 
instead,  a  biogeographical  mosaic  of  small,  distinctive 
faunules. 

While  the  gastropod  faunas  of  coastal  Honduras  and 
Nicaragua,  and  northern  Colombia  and  the  Gulf  of  Ven- 
ezuela are  now  better  known  (Petuch,  1987,  1988),  the 
intervening  Caribbean  coasts  of  Costa  Rica  and  Panama 
have  been,  to  date,  poorly  studied.  Only  a  single  large 
detailed  work  has  ever  been  published  on  the  molluscan 
systematics  of  this  area  (Olsson  &  McGinty ,  1958).  That 
paper,  however,  concentrated  on  the  micromollusca  and 
small  macromollusca  that  were  collected  in  beach  drift 
near  Bocas  del  Toro  and  Colon,  Panama.  Nevertheless, 
the  authors  described  a  number  of  unusual  new  species 
(some  of  which  are  listed  later  in  this  paper)  and  dem- 
onstrated that  the  Panama  coast  did  not  ha\e  a  typical 
West  Indian-type  Caribbean  fauna.  Houbrick  (1968)  fur- 
ther showed  that  several  of  Olsson  and  McGinty's  new- 
Panama  species  were  also  present  at  Portete,  Costa  Rica. 
These  range  extensions  indicate  that  the  (Caribbean  coasts 
of  Panama  and  Costa  Rica  harbor  a  fourth  Central  .Amer- 
ican-northern South  American  faunal  subregion.  \  year 
later,  Radwin  (1969)  published  a  species  list  of  macro- 
mollusks  that  had  been  collected  from  dredged  spoil  piles 
near  Cxilon.  By  incorporating  the  taxa  of  Olsson  and 
McGinty,  this  smaller  work  became  the  first,  and  only, 
compendium  of  the  molluscan  faima  of  this  fourth  faunal 
subregion. 

L'nlike  the  Honduran  and  Colombian  mainlands,  w  hich 
have  large  areas  of  mudcK  coastline  [i.e..  the  Gull  of 
Uraba),  the  Caribbean  coasts  of  Panama  and  Costa  Rica 
contain  large  areas  of  coral  reefs  and  coralline  algal  rub- 
ble bottoms.  Typical  of  these  carbonate  areas  are  the  reef 
platform  and  coral  cays  of  the  San  Bias  .Archipelago  and 
the  massive  coralline  algal  reefs  and  ridges  along  the 
Portobelo  coast  and  at  Moro  Tupo  (Vermeij,  1978:88- 
89).  While  working  with  local  fishermen  who  trawl  off- 
shore of  these  carbonate  areas,  several  Panamanian  mala- 
cologists,  in  particular  Mr.  James  Ernest  of  Balboa,  have 


Page  58 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


recently  collected  numerous  and  important  new  species 
of  macrogastropods.  Since  the  ranges  of  the  niicrogas- 
tropods  of  the  Caribbean  are  still  ver\  poorly  know  n,  the 
biogeographical  implications  of  Olsson  and  McGinty's 
micromolhisks,  as  indicators  of  a  new  faunal  subregion, 
are  too  tenuous.  On  the  other  hand,  the  ranges  of  the 
Caribbean  macrogastropods,  particularly  those  of  the 
eighteen  eutropical  index  families  (Petuch,  1988:6-7), 
are  much  better  known.  In  this  case,  the  macrogastropods 
collected  by  Mr.  Ernest  are  excellent  biogeographical 
indicators,  especially  since  the  ranges  of  their  congeners 
in  Honduras,  Nicaragua,  Colombia,  and  Venezuela  have 
recently  been  established  (Petuch,  1987,  1988). 

The  new  taxa  described  in  this  paper  help  to  demar- 
cate yet  another  biogeographical  subregion  of  the  Ca- 
ribbean Molluscan  Province.  This  new  subdivision  is 
spatially  bounded  by  the  Honduran  and  Colombian- Ven- 
ezuelan Subregions  (Petuch,  1988;  figure  42)  and  includes 
the  coasts  of  C^osta  Rica  and  Panama.  Since  the  San  Bias 
Archipelago  of  Panama  is  the  ecological  and  faunistic 
archetype,  I  here  refer  to  this  new  biogeographical  entity 
as  the  "Blasian  Subregion".  Unlike  the  Honduran  and 
Colombian- Venezuelan  Subregions,  which  contain  nu- 
merous Pliocene  Caribbean  relictual  taxa,  the  Blasian 
Subregion  characteristically  contains  numerous  Panam- 
ic-Caribbean  cognate  species  pairs  (scnsi/  Radwin,  1969). 
Of  the  nineteen  new  Blasian  taxa  described  here,  seven 
represent  previously-unknown  cognate  pairs.  The  other 
twelve  taxa  include  endemic  Blasian  members  of  Carib- 
bean species  complexes.  Nine  gastropod  families  are  rep- 
resented by  the  new  species,  and  all  of  these  higher  taxa 
can  be  used  for  provincial  subdivisional  analysis  (Petuch, 
1988:5-8).  Future  collecting  along  the  Panama-Costa 
Rica  mainland  may  uncover  sufficient  faunistic  data  to 
support  the  elevation  of  the  Blasian  Subregion  to  sub- 
provincial  status.  At  present,  not  enough  information 
exists  concerning  the  total  molluscan  fauna  and,  because 
of  this  lack,  I  prefer  to  refer  to  the  area  as  a  "subregion". 

THE  BLASIAN  GASTROPOD  FAUNA 

As  pointed  out  by  Radwin  (1969),  the  Blasian  gastropod 
fauna  bears  a  striking  resemblance  to  the  Panamic  fauna 
of  western  Central  and  South  America,  and  in  particular, 
the  Bay  of  Panama.  For  example,  unlike  the  faunas  of 
the  adjoining  Honduran  and  Colombian  regions,  the  Bla- 
sian area  contains  a  species  of  the  turrid  genus  Knefaslia 
Dall,  1919  (described  here),  which  is  normally  considered 
a  classic  Panamic  group.  Of  particular  interest  in  the 
Blasian  area  is  the  presence  of  the  bizarre  vermetid  genus 
Stephopoma  Morch,  1860  (Olsson  &  McGinty,  1958; 
Houbrick,  1968;  Radwin,  1969).  Like  Knefastia.  this 
characteristic  Panamic  gastropod  is  found  in  the  (Carib- 
bean only  within  the  Blasian  subregion.  The  small,  en- 
crusting vermetid,  Stephopoma  myrakeenac  OLsson  and 
McGinty,  1958,  lives  embedded  within  the  coralline  algal 
ridges  along  Colon  and  the  San  Bias  Archipelago,  and  at 
Portete,  Costa  Rica,  and  is  characteristic  of  the  unitiue 
Blasian  lithothamnion  community. 


The  new  Blasian  members  of  gastropod  cognate  pairs 
are  of  particular  importance  in  that  they  underscore  the 
faunal  ties  to  the  Panamic-Eastern  Pacific  areas.  Some 
newly  discovered  examples  of  Caribbean-Panamic  cog- 
nates, based  on  new  taxa  proposed  in  the  systematic 
section  of  this  paper,  include:  Turritella  marianopsis 
n.sp.  and  T.  mariana  Dall,  1908;  Dermutnurex  (Triala- 
tella)  cuna  n.sp.  and  D.  (Trialatclla)  cunniiighamae 
(Berry,  1964);  Murexiclla  edwardpaiiH  n.sp.  and  M. 
keenae  Vokes,  1970;  Latirus  cuna  n.sp.  and  L.  centri- 
fugus  (Dall,  1915);  Mitra  (Nebitlaria)  leonardi  n.sp.  and 
M.  (Nebularia)  sphoni  Shask%  and  Campbell,  1964; 
Pntnum  Iconardhilli  n.sp.  and  P.  curium  (Sowerby,  1833); 
and  Knefastia  hilli  and  K.  olivacea  (Sowerby,  1833). 

The  Atrato  Seaway,  the  last  connection  between  the 
Pacific  and  Atlantic  Oceans,  closed  at  the  end  of  the 
Pliocene  (Whitmore  &  Stewart,  1965;  Woodring,  1966; 
Petuch,  1988),  and  had  its  eastern  opening  along  what 
is  now  the  San  Bias  Archipelago  and  the  Golfo  de  Uraba. 
This  area,  which  was  the  last  to  be  exposed  to  the  Pacific 
molluscan  fauna,  would  be  expected  to  have  the  most 
Panamic-appearing  molluscan  assemblages  in  the  Carib- 
bean. The  recent  discovery  of  whole  suites  of  new  cog- 
nate gastropods  living  along  the  Blasian  area  supports 
this  hypothesis.  The  enclave  of  Panamic  mollusks  in  the 
Caribbean,  however,  is  geographically  small,  ranging 
from  near  San  Juan  del  Norte,  Nicaragua  (near  the  Nic- 
aragua-Costa Rica  border)  in  the  west  to  the  Golfo  de 
Uraba  in  the  east.  The  broad  Honduras-Nicaragua  con- 
tinental shelf,  which  contains  the  Honduran  Subregion, 
narrows  and  ends  at  San  Juan  del  Norte.  At  that  point, 
the  muddy  environment  of  the  Nicaraguan  coast  shifts 
to  the  cleaner  carbonate  environments  of  Costa  Rica  and 
Panama.  A  similar  situation  takes  place  at  the  western 
edge  of  the  Golfo  de  Uraba,  indicating  that  substrate 
type  is  the  major  limiting  factor  in  the  configuration  and 
distribution  of  the  southern  Caribbean  molluscan  subre- 
gions. The  substrate  and  bathymetric  preferences  of  some 
of  the  new  taxa  are  discussed  under  the  individual  de- 
scriptions in  the  systematic  section.  The  entire  Blasian 
Subregion,  with  its  attendant  faunule  appears  to  occupy 
a  stretch  of  coastline  of  only  slightly  over  800  km. 

The  following  is  a  listing  of  some  of  the  macrogastro- 
pods that  are  presentK  known  to  be  confined  to  the 
boundaries  of  the  Blasian  Subregion.  Most  of  these  belong 
to  ke\'  tropical  biogeographical  index  families  (as  out- 
lined by  Petuch,  1988).  Several  smaller  macrogastropods 
that  were  described  by  Olsson  and  McGinty  (1958)  are 
also  listed. 


Turbinidae-Liotiinae 

Arenc  Intleri  Olsson  and  McGinty,  1958 
Turritellidae 

Turritella  marianopsis  Petuch,  n.sp. 
Vermetidae 

Uteplidpoma  myrakeenac  Olsson  and  McGinty,  1958 
CCerithiidae 

Ceritliium  carihhaeum  M.  Smith,  1946 


E.  J.  Petuch,  1990 


Page  59 


Muricidae 

*Chicoreus  emihjae  Petucli,  1987 

Chicoretts  hilli  Petuch,  n.sp, 

Dermomurex  ciina  Petuch,  n.sp. 

Mitrexiella  edwardpauli  Petuch,  n.sp. 

Miirex  rubidun  panamicus  Petuch,  n.sp. 
Fasciolariidae 

Latirits  cuna  Petuch,  n.sp. 
Cohimbelhdae 

Nassarina  diibia  Olsson  and  McGint\,  1958 
Olividae 

Oliva  reticularis  crncsti  Petuch,  n.subsp. 

Olivella  chiriqiiicnsis  Olsson,  1956 

Olivella  marmosa  Olsson  and  McGinty,  1958 
Margineilidae 

Gibhcrula  bocasensis  Olsson  and  McGinty,  1958 

Persicula  iveberi  Olsson  and  McGinty,  1958 

Prunum  IconardhiUi  Petuch,  n.sp. 
Mitridae 

Mitra  (Nebularia)  Iconardi  Petuch,  n.sp. 
Volutidae 

Falsihjria  ernesti  Petuch,  n.sp. 

Valuta  lacertina  Petuch,  n.sp. 

Vohita  Hndae  Petuch,  1987 
Conidae 

Conns  brunncofilaris  Petuch,  n.sp. 

Conus  ernesti  Petuch,  n.sp. 

Conns  granarius  panamicus  Petuch,  n.subsp. 

Conns  hiUi  Petucli,  n.sp. 

Conns  portobeloensis  Petuch,  n.sp. 

Conns  rosernaryae  Petuch,  n.sp. 
Turridae 

Fnsitnrricula  sunderlandi  Petuch,  n.sp. 

Knefastia  hilli  Petuch,  n.sp. 

SYSTEMATIG  SECTION 

The  type  material  of  the  following  new  species  is  de- 
posited in  the  collection  of  the  Division  of  Mollusks, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  In- 
stitution, Washington,  DC,,  and  bears  USNM  numbers: 

Gastropoda 
Prosobranchia 
Gaenogastropoda 
Gerithiacea 


*  Note  Due  tu  an  error  in  my  field  notes,  1  iiicorreeti)  gave 
the  type  locality  of  Chicoreus  emilyae  as  "off  Punta  Patuca, 
Honduras"  (Petuch,  1987:65).  This  erroneous  type  locality  is 
here  emended  to  "Bocas  del  Toro,  Panama ',  the  locality  of  the 
paratype.  The  other  paratypes  that  came  from  "off  Roatau  is,, 
Honduras  ',  appear  to  represent  another,  undescribed  Chico- 
reus species,  and  not  E.  emilyae.  Chicoreus  emilyae  has  now 
been  found  to  be  a  true  Blasian  endemic  This  is  probably  the 
"Chicoreus  ftorifer"  listed  b>  Radwin  (1969:231). 


Family  Turritellidae 

Genus  Turritella  Lamarck,  1799 

Tnrritella  marianopsis  new  species 

(figures  1-3) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  58  mm,  trawled 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  65  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860523;  Paratypes  1-3— same  locality 
and  depth  as  holotype,  lengths  52,  44  and  47  mm,  USNM 
860524. 

Description:  Shell  tightly  coiled,  very  elongated,  classi- 
calK  turritelliform;  whorls  with  2  large  cords,  with  the 
anterior  cord  being  better  developed  and  projecting  far- 
ther from  shell  than  posterior  cord;  2  large  cords  strongly 
beaded,  giving  shell  rough  appearance;  2  smaller,  thin, 
beaded  threadlike  cords  present  between  2  large  cords, 
and  1  thin  beaded  cord  present  between  posterior  cord 
and  suture;  shell  color  brownish-tan  with  numerous 
closely-packed,  thin,  darker  brown  longitudinal  flam- 
mules;  early  whorls  pale  whitish-tan;  beaded  cords  with 
alternating  light  tan  and  dark  brown  spots,  giving  shell 
speckled  appearance;  base  of  shell  light  tan  with  scattered 
tan  flammules;  aperture  wide,  slightly  rectangular  in 
shape. 

Etymology:  Named  for  the  new  species  resemblance 
to  the  Panamic  Turritella  mariana  Dall,  1908  (.  .  .  "look- 
ing like  mariana"). 

Discussion:  Turritella  marianopsis  is  morphologically 
closest  to  the  Panamic  T.  mariana  Dall,  1908,  especially 
in  shell  shape,  color  pattern,  and  number  of  spiral  cords, 
but  differs  primarily  in  being  more  coarsely  sculptured, 
with  larger  beading  and  stronger,  more  elevated  spiral 
cords.  Otherwise,  the  two  species  are  very  similar  and 
form  an  excellent  example  of  a  Panamic-Caribbean  cog- 
nate pair.  According  to  local  collectors,  T.  marianopsis 
is  an  abundant  species  at  depths  of  around  60  m,  and 
apparently  forms  solid  beds  off  the  Portobelo  coast. 

Muricacea 
Muricidae 
Chicoreus  Montfort,  1810 

Chicoreus  hilli  new  species 
(figures  4,  5) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  26  mm,  traw  led 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  65  m  depth  off  Portobelo. 
Panama,  USNM  860525;  Parat)pes  1,  2— lengths  24  and 
26  mm,  same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  Leonard 
Hill  collection;  Paratype  3 — length  24  mm,  same  locality 
and  depth  as  holotype,  USNM  860526. 

Description:  Shell  small  for  genus,  fusiform  in  shape, 
thin  and  delicate;  3  well  de\eloped  varices  per  whorl; 
each  bod)  varix  ornamented  with  4  spines — one  large 
spine  on  shoulder,  one  small  spine  at  midbody,  and  2 
small  spines  clumped  together  at  bod\  whorl-siphonal 
canal  junction;  large  spine  on  shoulder  4  times  length  oi 
smaller  spines;  small,  scalelike  spines  sometimes  present 


Page  60 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


between  larger  spines  on  varix;  varical  spines  open, 
cupped,  ramose;  inter\arital  areas  ornamented  \\  ith  one 
large,  elongateil  knob;  bodv  whorl  sculptured  with  12- 
13  thin,  raised  spiral  cords;  one  or  more  very  fine  sec- 
ondary threads  present  between  cords;  siphonal  canal 
very  elongated,  narrow,  ornamented  with  3  large,  flat- 
teneil  spines  per  varix;  spiral  cords  and  threads  on  body 
«  horl  and  siphonal  canal  minutely  scaled;  aperture  pro- 
portionally large,  ovate;  shell  color  light  brownish-tan, 
\\  ith  varices  and  intervarical  knobs  being  of  darker  chest- 
nut brown. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  Leonard  C.  Hill  of  Miami, 
Florida,  who  recognized  the  species  as  new  and  who 
kiiulK  donated  the  type  material. 

Di>icussion:  Chicoreus  hilli  is  closest  to  C  mergtis  Yokes, 
1974  from  Florida,  the  West  Indian  .Arc,  and  northern 
South  America,  but  differs  in  being  a  smaller,  thinner, 
more  elongated  shell  with  proportionally  much  larger 
spines.  The  varices  of  Chicoreus  mergus  are  very  thick 
and  rounded,  giving  the  shell  a  compact,  squat  appear- 
ance. The  varices  of  Chicoreus  hilli,  on  the  other  hand, 
are  much  thinner  and  sharper,  giving  the  shell  a  more 
elongated,  graceful  appearance.  The  siphonal  canal  of 
C.  hilli  is  also  much  narrower  and  proportionally  much 
longer  than  that  of  C.  mergus.  The  shoulder  spine  of  C. 
hilli  is  also  proportionally  at  least  twice  as  long  as  the 
shoulder  spine  of  C.  mergus. 

Chicoreus  hilli  is  also  similar  to  Chicoreus  bullisi  Yokes, 
1974,  from  off  Nicaragua,  but  differs  in  being  a  much 
smaller,  much  more  delicate  shell  with  smaller  and  less- 
developed  varical  spines.  The  varices  of  C.  bullisi,  like 
those  of  C.  mergus,  are  also  much  thicker,  wider,  and 
more  rounded  than  those  of  C  hilli.  The  new  species  is 
the  smallest  known  Chicoreus  in  the  western  Atlantic, 
and  appears  to  be  restricted  to  the  coralline  algal  and 
carbonate  rubble  areas  off  Portobelo  and  the  San  Bias 
Archipelago. 


Dermomurex  Monterosato,  1890 
Tridatella  Berry,  1964 

Dermomurex  {Trialatella)  cuna  new  species 
(figures  9,  10) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  14  mm,  trawled 
by  commercial  hshermen  from  65  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860527;  Paratype  1— length  13  mm, 
same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  Leonard  Hill  col- 
lection, Miami,  Florida. 


Description:  Shell  elongated,  fusiform,  thin  and  fragile; 
early  whorls  with  6  small  thin  varices  per  whorl;  body 
whorl  and  penultimate  whorl  with  3  large,  thin,  winglike 
varices  per  whorl;  bodv  whorl  ornamented  with  6  low 
flattened  cords  with  cord  along  shoulder  being  strongest 
and  best  developed;  cords  extend  onto  winglike  varices, 
producing  slightly  scalloped  edges;  cords  of  intervarical 
areas  ornamented  with  small,  evenly-spaced  nodules;  si- 
phonal canal  elongated,  well  developed,  slightly  re- 
curved; aperture  proprotionally  large,  oval  in  shape;  en- 
tire shell  covered  with  thick,  cream-white,  pebbled 
intritacalx;  surface  of  intritacalx  of  varices  finely  striate. 

Etymology:  Named  for  the  Cuna  Indians  of  the  San 
Bias  Archipelago. 

Discussion:  Dermomurex  (Trialatella)  cuna  is  the  fifth- 
known  member  of  its  three-winged  subgenus  to  be  found 
in  the  western  Atlantic.  The  other  species  include  D. 
abyssicola  (Crosse,  1865)  from  Guadeloupe,  French  An- 
tilles, D.  glicksteini  Petuch,  1987  from  southeastern  Flor- 
ida, D.  kaicherae  Petuch,  1987  from  Yenezuela,  and  D. 
oxum  Petuch,  1979  from  the  Abrolhos  Archipelago,  Bra- 
zil. Of  the  Atlantic  species,  D.  cuna  is  closest  to  D.  kaich- 
erae, but  differs  in  being  a  more  broad-shouldered  shell 
with  a  proportionally  lower  spire,  and  in  being  a  smooth- 
er, less  sculptured  shell  lacking  the  broad,  thick  inter- 
varical cords  and  knobs  of  D.  kaicherae  (Petuch,  1987: 
plate  24,  figures  17,  18).  Of  the  known  Trialatella  species, 
D.  cuna  is  closest  to  the  Panamic  D.  cunninghamae 
(Berry,  1964),  the  type  of  the  subgenus,  and  the  two  form 
an  obvious  cognate  pair.  The  new  Caribbean  species 
differs  from  its  Panamic  cognate  in  being  a  more  elon- 
gated, slender  shell  with  a  proportionally  higher  spire 
and  less  developed  winged  varices.  The  form  and  number 
of  the  body  whorl  cords  and  the  structure  of  the  intri- 
tacalx of  the  two  species,  however,  are  very  similar. 

Yokes  (1975:  plate  4,  figures  3a, b)  illustrated  a  smaller 
specimen  of  D.  cuna  from  "Holandes  Cav,  off  ("ape  San 
Bias,  Panama,  22  fathoms  l)ut  referred  it  to  the  Lesser 
Antilles  species  D.  abyssicola.  She  later  reillustrated  the 
same  specimen  (Yokes,  1985:  figures  13a, b).  but  this  time 
referred  the  Panamanian  shell  to  the  Brazilian  D.  oxun^. 
This  now  well-known  specimen  of  D.  cuna,  however,  is 
a  juvenile  (with  6  varices)  of  only  9  mm  length,  and  does 
not  exhibit  the  adult  proportions.  Fully  mature,  three- 
winged  specimens  of  D.  cuna  (approximately  13  mm) 
and  D.  oxuni  (holotvpe  12.5  mm)  are  quite  different, 
with  D.  oxum  being  a  much  broader,  stockier  shell  with 
wider  bodv  whorl  cords  and  elongated  intervarical  knobs. 
.Although  similar  to,  and  often  confused  with  D.  abys- 


Figures  1-22.  New  gastropods  from  the  Caribbean  coast  of  Panama  1,  2.  Turrilrtla  marianopsis  new  species,  liolotype,  length 
58  mm.  L'SN'M  860523.  3.  Turriletla  marianopsis  new  species,  paratype,  length  52  mm.  I  .SNM  860524.  t.  5.  Chicarcn.s  hilli  new 
species,  holotype,  length  26  mm.  I  S.WI  860525  6,  7.  Murcxiclla  cdnardpauli  new  species,  holotvpe.  I'SNM  860529  8.  \tnrex 
rubidus  panamicus  new  subspecies,  holotype,  length  26  mm,  I  SNM  860528  9,  10.  Dcrnionuircx  (Trialatella)  cuna  neu  species, 
holotype,  length  14  mm,  USNM  860527.  11.  Valuta  virescens  Lightfoot.  1786,  43  min  specimen  from  Cartagena.  Colombia,  tor 


E.  J.  Petuch,  1990 


Page  61 


comparison  with  Valuta  lacertina.  12.  13.  Latirus  cuna  new  species,  holotype,  length  46  mm,  I  SNM  860531.  14,  15.  Mitra 
[Nebularia]  leonardi  new  species,  holotype,  length  22  mm,  USNM  860533.  16.  Valuta  lacertina  new  species,  paratype,  length  29 
mm,  IISNM  860538.  17,  18.  Prunum  leonardhilli  new  species,  holotype,  length  19  mm,  I'SNM  860536.  19,  20.  Oliva  (Strephona) 
reticularis  ernesti  new  species,  holotype,  length  38  mm,  USNM  860535.  21,  22.  Valuta  lacertina  new  species,  holotvpe,  length  31 
mm,  USNM  860537. 


Page  62 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


sicola,  D.  cuna  is  a  larger,  broader  shell  with  a  higher, 
more  obvioiisK'  stepped  spire.  The  siphonal  canals  of  botli 
D.  oxum  and  D.  ahyssicola  are  neither  as  elongated  nor 
as  well  developed  as  that  of  D.  cuna.  and  are  not  re- 
curved. 

In  the  fossil  record,  D.  cuna  is  most  similar  to  D. 
antecessor  Vokes,  1975  from  the  early  Pleistocene  of 
Costa  Rica  (Moin  Formation)  and  southern  Florida  (Ber- 
mont  Formation)  This  possible  Pleistocene  ancestor, 
however,  differs  from  the  Recent  Blasian  species  in  being 
a  more  elongated  species  with  less  developed  varices  and 
coarser  corded  body  whorl  sculpture. 

Murcx  Linnaeus,  1758 

Murex  rubidus  panainictts  new  subspecies 
(figure  8) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  26  mm,  trawled 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  50  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  I'SNM  860528;  Paratype  1— length  27  mm, 
same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  Leonard  Hill  col- 
lection, Miami,  Florida. 

Description:  Shell  small  for  genus,  with  fusiform  body; 
spire  high,  elevated;  body  whorl  and  varices  rounded;  3 
large,  thick  varices  per  whorl;  2-3  narrow,  elongated 
knobs  in  intervarical  areas;  body  whorl,  intervarical  knobs, 
and  varices  ornamented  with  12-14  large,  raised  spiral 
cords;  thin  spiral  threads  often  present  between  spiral 
cords;  siphonal  canal  extremely  long  and  narrow,  equal 
to  length  of  shell  body;  base  of  siphonal  canal  ornamented 
with  2  small  spines;  aperture  small,  rounded;  peristome 
ornamented  v\  ith  numerous  large  white  teeth;  shell  color 
bright  orange  with  2  darker  orange-tan  bands,  one  around 
shoulder  and  one  around  body  whorl-siphonal  canal  junc- 
tion; posterior  half  of  siphonal  canal  brown;  anterior  half 
of  siphonal  canal  pale  orange-white. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Panama,  the  country  of  the  type 
locality. 

Discussion:  Murex  rubidus  Baker,  1897  is  now  known 
to  have  a  split  distribution  within  the  Caribbean  region, 
with  the  nominate  subspecies,  M.  rubidus  rubidus.  being 
found  along  the  southeastern  and  western  coasts  of  Flor- 
ida and  the  northern  Bahamas  (Radwin  and  D'Attilio, 
1976:71),  and  with  a  small,  isolated  population,  M.  rubi- 
dus panamicus,  being  found  along  Caribbean  Panama. 
Both  populations  may  be  relicts  of  a  once  wide-ranging 
Pleistocene  species  that  has  become  biogeographically 
bisected  and  spatially  reduced  since  the  late  Pleistocene. 
Several  other  Blasian  species  also  share  close  morpholog- 
ical similarities  with  Bahamian  gastropods.  Included  are 
the  Blasian  Chicoreus  emihjae  Petuch,  1987  and  the 
Bahamian-Floridian  C.  florifer  Reeve,  1846  and  the  Bla- 
sian Conus  hilli  n..>-p  and  the  Bahamian  Conus  jucundus 
Sowerby,  1887  (=  C.  abbotti  Clench,  1942). 

Murex  rulndus  panamicus  differs  from  the  nominate 
subspecies  in  being  a  much  more  slender,  more  fusiform 
shell  with  a  much  higher,  more  protracted  spire.  The 
body  whorl  of  A/,  rubidus  rubidus  is  rounded  and  glo- 


bose, while  the  body  whorl  of  M.  rubidus  panamicus  is 
narrower  and  elongated. 

Murexiella  Clench  and  Farfante,  1945 

Murexiella  edwardpauli  new  species 
(figures  6,  7) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  15  mm,  trawled 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  50  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860529;  Paratype  1— length  15  mm, 
same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  USNM  860530. 

Description:  Shell  small  for  genus,  thin,  delicate,  with 
globose,  inflated  body;  6  varices  per  whorl,  varices  thin, 
with  6  large,  recurved  spines;  intervarical  areas  orna- 
mented with  6  large  spiral  cords;  intervarical  cords  and 
varices  minutely  squamose;  siphonal  canal  proportion- 
ally very  elongated,  ornamented  with  3  large,  flattened 
spines  per  siphonal  varix;  shell  consistentK  pinkish-tan 
colored  with  2  darker  tan  bands,  one  around  shoulder 
and  one  around  midbody;  shoulder  of  body  whorl  slightly 
angled;  aperture  proportionally  large,  oval  in  shape. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  Edward  D.  Paul  of  Miami. 
Florida. 

Discussion:  Murexiella  edwardpauli  is  closest  to  Mu- 
rexiella macgintyi  (Smith,  1938)  from  Florida  and  the 
Bahamas,  but  differs  in  being  a  much  smaller,  more 
delicate  species  with  a  much  more  globose  body  whorl, 
less  angled  shoulder,  and  proportionally  longer  and  nar- 
rower siphonal  canal.  Murexiella  edivardpauli  is  also 
similar  to  M.  leonardhilli  Petuch,  1987  from  Brazil,  but 
differs  in  being  a  much  smaller  shell  with  thinner,  less 
crassate  varices.  In  the  eastern  Pacific,  M.  edwardpauli 
is  very  similar  to  M.  keenae  Vokes,  1970,  but  differs  in 
being  a  smaller  shell  with  a  proportionalK  longer  si- 
phonal canal.  Based  on  shell  morphology,  M.  keenae  and 
M.  edivardpauli  can  be  seen  to  be  ver\'  closeK'  related 
and  represent  Panamic-Caribbean  cognates. 

Fasciolariidae 
Peristerniinae 
Latirus  Montfort,  1810 

Lalirus  cuna  new  species 
(figures  12,  13) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  46  mm,  traw  led 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  60  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860531;  Paratype  1— length  42  mm, 
same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  USNM  860532; 
Paratope  2 — length  45  mm,  same  localits  and  depth  as 
holotype,  collection  of  Leonard  Hill,  Miami,  Florida. 

Description:  Shell  elongately  fusiform,  w  ith  high,  sca- 
lariform  spire  and  narrow  protracted  siphonal  canal; 
shoulder  sharply  angled,  with  rounded,  spikelike  knobs; 
whorls  with  8  narrow,  raised  axial  ribs  per  whorl;  axial 
ribs  (>\erlaid  with  5  large,  thick  spiral  cords;  2  spiral 
ct)rds  at  shoulder  largest  and  best  developed,  projecting 
farthest  from  shell  body;  areas  between  large  cords  or- 


E.  J.  Petuch,  1990 


Page  63 


namented  with  numerous  very  fine  cords  and  spiral 
threads;  siphonal  canal  ornamented  with  4  large  spiral 
cords;  areas  between  large  siphonal  cords  ornamented 
with  numerous  fine  cords  and  threads;  interior  of  aper- 
ture with  10-12  large,  beaded  cords;  edge  of  lip  fineK 
crenulated,  with  crenulations  corresponding  to  fine  spiral 
cords  and  threads  on  shell  surface;  narrow  umbilicus 
present;  shell  color  bright  orange-tan;  large  cords  of  body 
whorl,  spire,  and  siphonal  canal  white;  interior  of  ap- 
erture orange. 

Etymology:  Named  for  the  Cuna  Indians  of  the  San 
Bias  Islands, 

Discussion:  Latiriis  cuna  somewhat  resembles  the  wide- 
spread Caribbean  L.  cariniferiis  Lamarck,  1822,  but  dif- 
fers in  being  a  more  slender,  elongated  shell  with  a  nar- 
rower, more  protracted  siponal  canal,  and  in  having  a 
more  sharpK  -angled  shoulder  with  proportionally  larger 
and  sharper  shoulder  knobs.  The  new  Blasian  species  is 
also  similar  to  the  Panamic  L.  ccntrifugus  (Dall,  1915), 
but  differs  in  being  a  more  slender,  elongated  shell  with 
a  proportionally  longer  siphonal  canal.  Otherwise,  both 
L.  centriftigus  and  L.  cuna  share  the  same  type  of  sharp- 
ly-angled shoulder,  large  shoulder  knobs,  and  strongly 
projecting  shoulder  cords.  I  feel  it  is  safe  to  assume  that 
L.  cuna  and  L.  ccntrifugus  form  a  cognate  species  pair. 

Volutacea 

Mitridae 

Mitra  Lamarck,  1798 

Nebularia  Swainson,  1840 

Mitra  {Nebularia)  leonardi  new  species 
(figures  14,  15) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  22  mm,  trawled 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  60  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860533;  Paratype  1— length  20  mm, 
same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  USNM  860534. 

Description:  Shell  narrow  and  elongated,  fusiform;  spire 
high,  protracted,  scalariform;  suture  indented,  producing 
narrow  shoulder  area  and  stepped  spire  whorls;  body 
whorl  ornamented  with  12  large,  thick  spiral  cords;  col- 
umella with  4  plications,  with  posteriormost  plications 
being  largest;  shell  color  white,  heavily  overlaid  with 
wide,  reddish  brown  vertical  flammules;  reddish-brown 
flammules  often  coalesce  into  large,  longitudinal  patches; 
some  specimens  (holotype)  with  thin  white  band  around 
midbody;  aperture  thin,  narrow,  roughly  one-half  length 
of  shell. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  Leonard  C.  Hill  of  Miami, 
Florida  who  kindly  donated  the  type  material. 

Discussion:  In  the  Caribbean,  Mitra  leonardi  is  closest 
to  M.  semiferrtiginea  Reeve,  1845,  from  the  Bahamas, 
but  differs  in  being  a  smaller,  much  narrower  shell  with 
a  proportionally  larger  aperture.  The  two  species  also 
differ  in  color;  with  M.  semiferruginea  being  colored 
bright  yellow  with  dark,  blackish-brown  flammules  and 
with  M.  leonardi  being  white  with  reddish-brown  flam- 


mules. In  the  eastern  Pacific,  M.  leonardi  is  closest  to  M. 
sphoni  Shasky  and  Campbell,  1964,  especially  in  size  and 
color,  but  differs  in  having  a  more  scalariform,  stepped 
spire.  Mitra  sphoni  and  M.  leonardi.  together,  are  another 
example  of  a  Panamic-Caribbean  cognate  species  pair. 

Olividae 

Oliva  Bruguiere,  1789 

Strephona  Morch,  1852 

Oliva  (Strephona)  reticularis  ernesti  new  subspecies 

(figures  19,  20) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  38  mm,  trawled 
from  40  m  depth  on  silty  sand  bottom  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860535;  Paratypes  1-3— lengths  37-41 
mm,  same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  Petuch  col- 
lection. 

Description:  Shell  average  size  for  subgenus,  cylindri- 
cal, with  only  slightly  rounded  shoulder;  spire  low;  body 
whorl  colored  yellowish-tan,  overlaid  with  dense,  close- 
packed  pattern  of  small,  dark  brown  triangles  and  zig- 
zags; 2  wide  bands  of  darker  brown  triangles  present 
around  bod>'  whorl,  one  around  anterior  one-third  and 
one  around  area  just  posterior  of  midbody  line;  sutural 
area  marked  with  large,  evenly-spaced  yellow  patches 
and  numerous  fine  black  hairlines;  spire  whorls  glazed- 
over  with  dark  purple-brown  enamel;  aperture  and  col- 
umellar  area  white;  columella  with  15-20  thin  plicae; 
fasciole  yellow-tan  marked  with  2  rows  of  large  dark 
brown  checkers;  protoconch  proportionally  small,  col- 
ored dark  purple-brown. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  James  Ernest  of  Balboa, 
Panama,  who  collected  the  type  lot. 

Discussion:  Oliva  reticularis  ernesti  from  the  Blasian 
area  differs  from  O.  reticularis  reticularis  Lamarck,  1810, 
from  the  Bahamas  and  West  Indian  Arc,  in  being  a  more 
straight-sided,  cylindrical  shell  with  a  much  lower  spire. 
The  new  subspecies  is  also  a  darker-colored  shell  with  a 
finer  and  denser  pattern  of  triangle  markings.  Oliva  re- 
ticularis ernesti  occurs  with,  and  has  often  been  confused 
with,  Oliva  hewleiji  Marrat,  1871.  That  species,  however, 
is  a  much  larger  shell  (av.  55  mm)  with  a  proportionateK' 
higher  spire  and  larger  protoconch.  Oliva  bewleyi  has  a 
much  more  diffuse  color  pattern,  with  the  triangle  mark- 
ings and  zigzags  having  a  "smeared"  look.  The  triangle 
markings  of  O.  reticularis  ernesti.  on  the  other  hand, 
are  consistently  clear  and  distinct.  Although  O.  bewleyi 
is  now  known  to  range  from  Panama  to  Santa  Marta, 
Colombia  (Petuch  &  Sargent,  1986:126),  O.  reticularis 
ernesti  appears  to  be  restricted  to  the  Blasian  area. 

Marginellidae 

Prunum  Hermannsen,  1852 

Prunum  leonardhilli  new  species 

(figures  17,  18) 

Material  examined:  Holot\  pe — Length  19  mm,  trawled 
from  60  m  depth  h\  commercial  fishermen,  off  Portobelo, 


Page  64 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


Panama,  USNM  860536.  Paratypes  1,  2— lengths  18  mm 
and  19  mm,  same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  Leon- 
ard Hill  c'ollet'lioM. 

Description:  Shell  elongated,  ovate,  somewhat  inflated; 
base  of  shell  flattened  anteriorly,  bordered  by  thickened 
parietal  callus  that  connects  with  thickened  outer  lip 
around  anterior  end;  margins  of  shell  thickened;  spire 
relatively  low;  columella  with  4  very  large  plications  that 
extend  beyond  aperture  region  onto  shell  base;  aperture 
narrow,  slightly  wider  at  anterior  end;  shell  pale  bluish- 
gray  color  with  2  darker  gray  bands;  thickened  lip  and 
basal  callus  white;  junction  of  body  whorl  and  lip  marked 
by  thin  \  ellow  line;  body  whorl-lip  junction  area  suffused 
with  pale  yellow  color;  interior  of  aperture  bright  orange- 
brown;  protoconch  and  early  whorls  pale  orange-tan. 

Elymology:  Named  for  Mr.  Leonard  C.  Hill  of  Miami, 
Florida,  who  kindly  donated  the  holotype. 

Discussion:  Prttruim  Iconardliilli  is  very  similar  to  P. 
curtum  (Sowerby,  1832)  from  the  coasts  of  Ecuador  and 
Peru,  as  both  species  share  the  same  shell  shape,  shell 
size,  and  form  of  the  columellar  plications.  Pritnum  cur- 
tum. however,  is  a  yellow  shell  with  a  pale  orange  outer 
lip,  while  P.  leonardhilli  is  basically  a  blue-gray  shell 
with  a  white  outer  lip.  Regardless  of  color,  the  two  species 
appear  to  be  cognates.  In  the  Caribbean  P.  leonardhilli 
is  closest  to  P.  prunum  (Gmelin,  1791),  which  is  abundant 
and  widespread  along  the  coasts  of  Colombia  and  Ven- 
ezuela. The  new  Panamanian  species  differs  from  the 
common  P.  prunum,  however,  in  being  a  smaller,  more 
globose,  and  less  elongated  shell,  with  much  larger  col- 
umellar plications.  The  columellar  plications  of  P.  pru- 
num do  not  extend  as  far  onto  the  shell  base  as  do  those 
of  P.  leonardhilli.  The  two  species  also  appear  to  be 
ecologically  exclusive,  with  P.  prunum  preferring  the 
organic-rich  coastal  muds  and  P.  leonardhilli  preferring 
fine  particulate  carbonate  bottoms  in  offshore  areas. 
Prunum  leonardhilli  is  sympatric  with  another  Blasian 
marginellid  endemic,  Persicula  weheri  Olsson  and 
McGinty,  1958. 


Volutidae 
Volutinae 
Valuta  Linnaeus,  1758 

Valuta  lacerlina  new  species 
(figures  16,  21,  22) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  31  mm,  trawled 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  100  m  depth  off  Porto- 
belo,  Panama.  USNM  860537;  Paratype  1— length  29 
mm,  same  depth  and  locality  as  holotype,  USNM  860538; 


Paratype  2 — length  30  mm,  same  depth  and  locality  as 
holotype,  Leonard  Hill  collection. 

Description:  Shell  very  small  for  genus,  averaging  only 
30  mm  in  length;  shell  outline  broadly  fusiform,  tapering 
toward  anterior  end;  spire  elevated;  shoulder  rounded, 
ornamented  with  10-12  low,  riblike  knobs;  body  whorl 
ornamented  with  20-24  horizontally-arranged,  deeply 
incised  spiral  sulci  and  numerous  thin  longitudinal  plicae; 
sulci  and  plicae  intersect  to  produce  strong  cancellate 
sculpture  pattern;  intersection  of  pair  of  sulci  and  plicae 
producing  large,  raised  bead,  giving  entire  surface  of 
body  whorl  pebbly  appearance;  subsutural  area  orna- 
mented with  6  large  spiral  cords;  shell  color  yellowish- 
tan  overlaid  with  numerous  minute  brown  dots  and  3 
bands  of  large  light  brown  rectangular  patches,  one  along 
suture,  one  below  shoulder,  and  one  around  anterior  end; 
protoconch  proportionally  large,  composed  of  2  whorls, 
flattened  and  somewhat  discoidal;  protoconch  asymmet- 
rical in  form,  with  first  whorl  projecting  dorsally  out  of 
alignment  with  second  whorl;  protoconch  light  brown  in 
color;  aperture  wide,  yellow  to  pale  orange  in  interior; 
columella  with  10  large,  thin,  smooth  plications;  thin, 
small,  secondary  plications  sometimes  present  between 
anteriormost  primary  plications;  outer  lip  of  adults  thick- 
ened, marked  with  10-12  small  brown  spots;  operculum 
unknown. 

Etymology:  "Little  lizard",  in  reference  to  the  new 
species'  beaded  appearance,  which  resembles  lizard  skin. 

Discussion:  Valuta  lacertina  is  the  smallest-known  Va- 
luta s.s.  and  is  also  the  deepest-dwelling,  having  been 
trawled  from  100  m  depth.  All  other  Valuta  s.s.,  and 
members  of  the  closely-related  Falsilyria  Pilsbry  and 
Olsson,  1954  species  complex,  prefer  depths  of  30  to  50 
m  and  some  are  often  collected  by  SCL'BA  diving  (such 
as  Falsilyria  .■iundcrlandi  Petuch,  1987  from  10  m  depth 
off  Utila  Island,  Honduras).  At  Cartagena,  Colombia,  the 
closely-related  Valuta  virescens  Lightfoot,  1786  is  found 
in  shallow  subtidal  depths  and  frequently  is  collected  as 
beach  specimens. 

Valuta  lacertina  is  most  similar  to  the  other  Blasian 
endemic  volute,  V.  lindae  Petuch,  1987  (figure  23),  but 
differs  in  being  a  smaller,  more  heavily  scuptured  shell 
with  a  more  rounded  shoulder.  The  sculpture  pattern  of 
the  two  species  also  differs,  with  V.  lacertina  having  a 
pebbly,  beaded  surface  texture  and  with  V.  lindae  having 
stronger  longitudinal  plicae  that  give  the  shell  a  wrinkled 
look.  The  shoulder  knobs  of  V.  lacertina  are  weak  and 
rounded,  while  those  of  \'.  lindae  are  strong,  angled,  and 
sharpl)  pointed.  Valuta  lindae  is  also  a  more  brightly 
colored  shell,  being  an  intense  yellow  or  yellow-orange 
and  having  large,  dark  brown  spots  in  rows  around  the 
bodv  whorl.  Valuta  lacertina,  on  the  other  hand,  is  a 


Figures  2:i-il.  \pu  Volutes  (Xoliilidae).  Cones  (Conidae).  and  Turrids  (Turridae)  from  the  C:aribbean  coast  of  Panama  23. 
Voliila  lindae  Petiich,  1987,  46  mm  lioiotypc  from  Bocas  del  Toro,  Panama,  for  comparison  with  Vohita  lacertina.  21,  2,'j.  Falsilyria 
erne.sti  new  species,  holoU  pc  |pni;lli  ."^4  mm,  USNM  860539.  26,  27.  Conus  grariarius  panaminis  new  subspecies,  hnioh  |>c  l.-tigth 


E.  J.  Petuch,  1990 


Page  65 


24  mm,  IISNM  860543,  28.  29.  Conus  crnesti  new  species,  liolotype,  length  29  mm,  USNM  860542,  30,  31.  Contts  brunneofxlaris 
new  species,  liolotype,  length  14  mm,  LISNM  860541,  32,  33.  Conus  poriobeloensis  new  species,  hulutype,  length  31  mm.  USNM 
860545,  34,  35.  Conus  rosemaryae  new  species,  holotype,  length  25  mm,  L'SNM  860546.  36,  37.  Conus  hilli  new  species,  hololype, 
length  21  mm,  USNM  860544.  38,  39.  Knefastia  hilli  new  species,  holotype,  length  50  mm.  I'SNM  860548.  40.  41.  Fusiturrirula 
sunderlandi  new  species,  holotype,  length  33  mm,  USNM  860547, 


Page  66 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


drab  little  shell,  being  a  pale  tan  or  yellowish-tan  and 
lacks  the  large,  scattered  brown  spots  seen  on  V.  lindac. 
Both  species,  however,  have  the  same  fine-dotted  pattern 
that  covers  the  entire  shell,  although  the  dots  of  V.  lindae 
are  proportionally  larger  and  darker.  The  protoconchs 
of  the  two  species  also  differ  significantly,  with  that  of 
V".  lindae  being  inflated  and  cylindrical  in  form,  while 
that  of  V.  lacertina  is  flattened  and  asymmetrical.  Balhy- 
metrically,  the  two  species  also  differ,  with  V.  lacertina 
living  at  depths  of  100  m  or  deeper  and  with  V.  lindae 
preferring  much  shallower  areas  of  20  to  50  m  depth. 

Valuta  lacertina  is  also  similar  to  the  well  known  V. 
virescens  (figure  11),  which  ranges  from  off  Nicaragua 
to  Santa  Marta,  Colombia,  and  the  two  species  appear 
to  represent  a  pair  of  bathymetric  siblings.  As  in  V. 
lindae,  V.  virescens  prefers  shallower  depths,  ranging 
from  5  to  35  m.  The  substrate  preferences  of  these  three 
closely-knit  species  also  appear  to  differ,  with  V.  lacer- 
tina and  V.  lindae  preferring  coralline  algal  rubble  and 
carbonate  bottoms  and  with  V.  virescens  preferring 
muddy,  organic-rich  bottoms.  Valuta  virescens  from  the 
organic  detrital  and  reducing  substrates  within  the  Golfo 
de  Uraba,  on  the  Panama-Colombia  border,  are  stained 
black  from  reduced  iron  compounds  and  are  often  en- 
crusted with  iron  sulfide  Valuta  lindac  and  \'.  lacertina. 
from  the  cleaner  carbonate  substrates  of  the  Blasian  area, 
are  usually  shiny  and  uncoated  by  iron  compounds. 

Morphologically,  V.  virescens  differs  from  V.  lacertina 
in  being  a  larger  shell  with  a  smooth  shell  sculpture  that 
lacks  the  pebbly  beading.  The  basic  shell  coloring  also 
differs  between  the  two  species,  with  V.  virescens  being 
a  characteristic  green  or  greenish-gray  while  V.  lacertina 
is  a  pale  yellow-tan.  The  protoconch  of  V.  virescens  is 
proportionally  smaller  than  that  of  V.  lacertina,  being 
narrow  and  cylindrical  in  form.  The  protoconch  of  V. 
lacertina  is  large  for  such  a  small  shell,  and  is  flattened 
and  almost  discoidal  in  form.  Interestingly  enough,  al- 
though V.  virescens  is  the  largest  species  of  the  Pana- 
manian-Colombian Valuta  species  complex,  it  has  a  pro- 
portionally much  smaller  protoconch  than  those  of  its 
diminutive  relatives,  V.  lindae  and  V.  lacertina. 

Falsilyria  and  Pilsbry  and  Olsson,  1954 

Falsilyria  ernesti  new  species 
(figures  24,  25) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  54  mm,  trawled 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  65  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860539;  Paratype  1— length  55  mm, 
same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  USNM  860540; 
Paratype  2 — length  54  mm,  same  locality  and  depth  as 
holotype,  Leonard  Hill  collection,  Miami,  Florida. 

De.scription:  Shell  narrow,  elongated,  fusiform,  thick 
and  heavy;  spire  elevated,  protracted;  spire  whorls  slight- 
ly convex  in  outline;  whorls  ornamented  with  8-10  large, 
rounded,  axial  plications;  large  plications  overlaid  with 
numerous  thin,  riblike  plications;  shoulder  angled,  bor- 
dered by  single  large  spiral  cord;  subsutural  areas  sculp- 
tured with  3  large  spiral  cords;  subsutural  spiral  cords 


intersect  with  thin  axial  riblets  to  produce  beaded  texture 
on  shoulder  and  spire;  bod\  whorl  shiny,  polished;  an- 
terior end  sculptured  with  5-6  large  spiral  Cf)rds;  colu- 
mella slightly  arcuate,  with  11-12  thin,  smooth  plica- 
tions; outer  lip  of  adults  thickened,  projecting 
posteriorward;  protoconch  proportionally  large,  round- 
ed, domelike;  shell  color  pale  salmon-yellow  with  2  wide 
bands  of  brown  and  pale  purple  checkers  and  spots,  one 
around  midbody  and  one  around  anterior  end;  midbody 
band  overlaid  with  4-6  brown  spiral  hairlines  and  nu- 
merous tiny  brown  vertical  flammules;  anterior  band 
similarly  marked  with  5  brown  hairlines  and  tiny  vertical 
flammules;  salmon-yellow  areas  between  wide  colored 
bands  completely  overlaid  with  closely-packed,  tiny  or- 
ange-brown speckles;  protoconch  light  tan;  columella  and 
interior  of  aperture  pale  salmon;  edge  of  lip  yellowish- 
white,  marked  with  evenly-spaced  dark  brown  spots. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  James  Ernest  of  Balboa, 
Panama,  who  collected  the  type  lot. 

Discussion:  Of  the  Fasilyria  species  complex,  F.  ernesti 
is  the  southernmost  known  member,  and  its  discovery 
came  as  a  surprise  to  me.  Previously  (Petuch,  1987:62), 
I  had  stated  that  the  genus  was  restricted  to  the  coasts 
of  Honduras  and  northern  Nicaragua.  The  new  Blasian 
species,  therefore,  represents  a  considerable  range  ex- 
tension for  the  complex.  Of  the  eight  known  Falsilyria 
species,  F.  ernesti  is  most  similar  to  F.  demarcoi  (Olsson, 
1965)  from  Honduras,  but  differs  in  being  a  much  small- 
er, more  slender  and  elongated  shell,  with  a  much  more 
sharply-angled  shoulder.  The  Honduran  F.  demarcai  is 
also  a  much  more  brightly  colored  shell,  having  a  deep 
orange  base  tone.  The  Blasian  F.  ernesti,  on  the  other 
hand,  is  a  less  colorful  shell,  having  a  base  tone  of  pale 
salmon-yellow.  In  shape  and  in  having  a  small  adult  size, 
F.  ernesti  is  also  similar  to  F.  hara.seivychi  Petuch,  1987, 
from  off  Roatan  Island.  The  new  species  differs  from  F. 
hamseioychi.  however,  in  having  a  salmon-\ellow  base 
color  instead  of  white,  and  in  lacking  the  wine-red  flam- 
mules and  black  and  white  checkered  bands  of  F.  harase- 
wychi.  The  Roatan  species  has  distinctive,  characteristic 
beaded  columellar  plications,  while  those  of  F.  ernesti 
are  smooth. 

Conacea 
Conidae 
Canus  Linnaeus,  1758 

Conus  brunneofilaris  new  species 
(figures  30,  31) 

IVIaterial  examined:  Holotype — Length  14  mm,  trawled 
bv  commercial  fishermen  from  65  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  IISNM  860541. 

Description:  Shell  small,  elongately  conical,  thin,  fra- 
gile; shoulder  sharpK  angled,  carinated;  carina  faintly 
undulating;  spire  moderately  elevated,  with  stepped 
whorls;  body  whorl  shiny  and  polished;  anterior  tip  en- 
circled with  6  small  spiral  cords;  aperture  narrow,  slightly 
w  idcr  at  anterior  end;  protoconch  proportionalK   large. 


E.  J.  Petuch,  1990 


Page  67 


mammillate;  shell  color  bright  golden-tan  with  wide 
niidbod)  band  of  large  white  patches  and  dark  brown 
flammules;  anterior  tip  marked  with  large  white  flam- 
mules;  golden-tan  and  white  base  color  overlaid  with  21 
extremely  fine,  hairlike,  dark  brown  spiral  lines;  shoulder 
and  spire  white  with  large,  evenly-spaced,  dark  brown 
flammules;  spire  flammules  extend  over  edge  of  shoulder 
carina  onto  body  whorl;  interior  of  aperture  white;  pro- 
toconch  and  early  whorls  bright  yellow. 

Etymology:  "Brown  threaded",  in  reference  to  the 
prominent,  evenly-spaced,  thin  brown  lines  that  encircle 
the  body  whorl. 

Discussion:  Conns  bninneofilaris.  with  its  distinct  brown 
spiral  lines,  resembles  no  other  known  Caribbean  or  Pan- 
amic  cone  shell.  In  shape  and  size,  this  unusual  new 
species  is  most  similar  to  C.  magnottei  Petuch,  1987  from 
Roatan  Island,  Honduras,  but  differs  in  having  a  bright 
golden-tan  base  color  instead  of  the  pink  and  purple  color 
ot  C.  magnottei,  and  in  having  the  overlay  color  pattern 
of  brown  lines,  which  is  lacking  in  the  Honduran  species. 
The  spire  flammules  of  C.  magnottei  are  also  larger  and 
more  irregular  than  those  of  C.  bninneofilaris  and  do 
not  extend  onto  the  body  whorl. 

Coj}tis  ernesti  new  species 

(figures  28,  29) 

IMaterial  examined:  Holotype — Length  29  mm,  trawled 
by  commercial  fishermen  form  65  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860542;  Paratype  1— length  31  mm, 
same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  Kevan  Sunderland 
collection. 

Description:  Shell  slender,  tapering  rapidly  toward  an- 
terior tip;  shoulder  wide,  sharply  angled;  spire  high,  el- 
evated, scalariform;  shell  smooth,  polished,  with  deeply- 
impressed  spiral  sulci  around  anterior  end;  aperture 
straight,  narrow;  shell  color  white  with  12-20  rows  of 
small  brown  dots  and  dashes;  rows  of  dots  often  aligned 
to  form  large  brown  vertical  flammule;  dotted  pattern 
overlaid  with  variable  amounts  of  amorphous  lighter 
brown  patches;  clear  band,  with  only  one  or  two  rows 
of  dots,  present  around  midbody;  some  specimens  (ho- 
lotype) with  brown  patches  coalescing  into  2  broad  bands, 
one  above,  and  one  below,  midbody;  anterior  tip  of  shell 
white;  spire  whorls  white  with  numerous,  evenly-spaced 
crescent-shaped  flammules;  early  whorls  brown;  interior 
of  aperture  white. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  James  Ernest  of  Balboa, 
Panama,  who  collected  the  holotype. 

Discussion:  Conus  ernesti  is  most  similar  to  Conns  cin- 
gulatus  Lamarck,  1810  from  the  Caribbean  coast  of  Co- 
lombia, but  differs  in  being  a  smaller,  lighter  colored 
shell  with  a  much  higher,  scalariform  spire.  The  lower- 
spired  Conus  cingulattis  is  a  rough-textured  shell,  with 
the  body  whorl  being  heavily  sculptured  with  incised 
sulci  and  raised  spiral  threads.  Conns  ernesti,  on  the 
other  hand,  is  a  smooth,  almost  polished  shell,  with  in- 


cised sulci  onlv  on  the  anterior  end.  The  dark  purple- 
brown  C.  cingnlatus  has  a  purple  aperture,  whereas  the 
white  and  light  brown  C.  ernesti  has  a  white  aperture. 
The  new  species  is  also  similar  to  C.  garciai  daMotta, 
1982  from  the  Caribbean  coast  of  Honduras,  but  differs 
in  being  a  nuich  smaller  shell  with  rows  of  brown  dots. 
Like  C.  cingnlatus,  C.  garciai  is  also  a  rough-textured 
shell,  heavily  ornamented  with  raised  threads,  and  differs 
greatly  from  the  smooth  C.  ernesti.  Together,  C.  garciai, 
C.  ernesti,  and  C.  cingnlatus  form  an  interesting  species 
complex,  with  each  being  restricted  to  a  separate  mol- 
luscan  assemblage. 


Conns  granarins  partamicus  new  subspecies 
(figures  26,  27) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  24  mm,  trau  led 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  40  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860543;  Paratype  1— length  28  mm, 
same  locality  and  depth  as  holotype,  Leonard  Hill  col- 
lection. 

Description:  Shell  subpyriform,  tapering  abruptK  to- 
ward anterior  end;  shoulder  sharply  angled,  subcarinat- 
ed;  spire  very  high,  elevated,  protracted;  shoulder  pe- 
riphery and  spire  whorls  heavily  ornamented  with 
numerous  large,  rounded  beads,  producing  distinctly  co- 
ronated spire;  body  whorl  shiny,  ornamented  with  IS- 
IS evenly-spaced  rows  of  tiny  pustules;  shoulder  and 
subsutural  area  flattened,  producing  pronounced  stepped 
spire;  shell  color  pale  lilac,  often  overlaid  with  large, 
vertically-oriented,  light  tan  patches;  interior  of  aperture 
violet. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Panama,  country  of  the  type 
locality. 

Discussion:  Conus  granarins  panamicus  may  represent 
an  isolated  population  of  the  wide-ranging  C.  granarins 
granarins,  which  ranges  from  northern  Colombia  into 
the  Gulf  of  Venezuela.  The  new  subspecies  differs  from 
the  nominate  subspecies  in  being  a  smaller,  stumpier, 
more  biconically-shaped  shell  with  a  proportionally  higher 
and  more  scalariform  spire.  Conus  granarins  panamicus 
also  lacks  the  spiral  rows  of  dots  that  characterize  the 
color  pattern  of  C.  granarins  granarins,  and  is  a  much 
paler,  less  colorful  shell.  Some  specimens  of  C.  granarins 
panamicus  are  uniformly  pale  lilac  (like  the  holotype), 
while  others  have  large  tan  patches.  Although  the  nom- 
inate subspecies  appears  to  prefer  muddy,  siliciclastic 
sediment  bottoms  with  large  amounts  of  organic  matter, 
C.  granarins  panamicus  prefers  coralline  rubble  and 
carbonate  sand  bottoms. 

It  is  conceivable  that  C.  granarins  panamicus  may,  in 
fact,  be  a  full  species,  closely  related  to,  but  distinct  from, 
C.  granarins  granarins.  The  new  taxon  may  be  part  of 
a  Honduras-Panama-Colombia  species  complex,  much 
as  in  the  case  of  Conns  garciai-ernesti-cingulatns.  This 
species  complex,  then,  would  comprise  the  Honduran  C. 
harlandi  Petuch,  1987,  the  Panamanian  C.  panamicus. 


Page  68 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


and  the  Colombian  C.  granarius,  with  each  being  part 
of  a  localized,  eiideiiiic  fauniile. 


Coriua  liilli  new  species 
(figures  36,  37) 

Material  examined:  Ilolotype— Length  21  mm,  trawled 
b\  commercial  fishermen  from  26  mm  depth  off  Por- 
lobelo,  Panama,  USNM  860544. 

Description:  Shell  stocky,  broad  across  shoulder;  spire 
low,  flattened;  shoulder  sharpK -angled,  subcarinated; 
shoulder  and  spire  whorls  ob.soletely  coronated,  with  low, 
evenly-spaced  undulations  along  periphery;  body  whorl 
very  smooth,  polished,  shiny;  anterior  tip  with  10  small, 
slightK  raised  spiral  cords;  shell  color  deep  purple-blue 
w  ith  blotch)  ,  light  blue  band  around  midbod> ;  light  blue 
midbody  band  marked  with  4  rows  of  tiny,  closely-spaced 
reddish-brown  dots;  spire  whorls  white  with  evenly- 
spaced,  large  dark  brown  cre.scent-shaped  flammules; 
protoconch  mammillate,  protracted,  light  orange  in  col- 
or; aperture  narrow,  purple  within. 


Etymology: 

Florida. 


Named  for  Mr.  Leonard  C.  Hill  of  Miami, 


Discussion:  Conus  hilli  is  most  similar  to,  and  appar- 
ently is  a  close  relative  of,  Conus  kulkulcan  Petuch,  1980 
from  the  Bay  Islands  of  Honduras.  The  new  species  dif- 
fers from  C.  kulkulcan,  however,  in  having  a  lower, 
flatter  spire,  and  in  having  a  squatter,  less  elongated 
shape.  The  spire  whorls  and  shoulder  of  C.  kulkulcan 
are  marked  with  numerous  fine,  dark  brown  hairlines. 
but  these  are  absent  on  C.  hilli.  Conus  kulkulcan  is  also 
a  textured  shell,  having  spiral  rows  of  tiny  pustules  around 
the  body  whorl.  Conus  hilli,  on  the  other  hand,  is  an 
unte.xtured  shell,  having  a  highly  polished,  shiny  body 
whorl.  As  in  the  case  of  the  last  two  new  cones  in  this 
paper,  Conus  hilli  forms  an  interesting  species  trio  with 
closely- related  Honduran  and  Colombian  species.  This 
complex,  then,  includes  C.  kulkulcan  from  Honduras,  C. 
hilli  from  Panama,  and  C.  colomlrianus  Petuch,  1987 
from  northern  Colombia.  Other  related  species  in  this 
close-knit  Caribbean  complex  include  C.  jucundus  Sow- 
erby,  1887  (=  C.  abbotti  Clench,  1942)  and  C.  inconstans 
E.  A.  Smith,  1877  from  the  Bahamas,  C.  arangoi  Sarasua, 
1977  from  Cuba,  C^ay  Sal,  and  Turks  and  Caicos,  C. 
cardinalis  Hwass,  1792  and  C.  cidaris  Kiener,  1845  from 
Hispaniola  and  the  West  Indian  Arc,  C.  mayaguensis 
Nowell-Usticke,  1968  from  the  Dominican  Republic  and 
Puerto  Rico,  C.  harasewychi  Petuch,  1987  from  Palm 
Beach,  Florida,  and  possibly  C.  abrolhosensis  Petuch, 
1987  from  the  Abrolhos  Archipelago  of  Brazil. 

Conus  portobeloensis  new  species 
(figures  32,  33) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  31  mm,  Irawled 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  30  m  depth  off  Portobclo, 
Panama,  USNM  860545. 


Description:  Shell  elongate,  subpyriform,  with  low  spire; 
earliest,  postnuclear  spire  whorls  protracted,  becoming 
flattened  during  ontogeny;  shoulder  sharpK  angled,  edged 
with  small  but  distinct  carina  that  projects  be>ond  shoul- 
der margin;  body  whorl  smooth  and  shiny,  with  20  large, 
raised  cords  around  anterior  quarter;  spire  whorls  smooth; 
shell  color  white,  marked  with  intermittent  longitudinal 
flammules  of  pale  orange-tan;  longitudinal  flanmniles,  in 
turn,  overlaid  with  scattered  darker  tan  dots  and  dashes; 
anterior  end  of  body  whorl  pale  \ellow-orange;  spire 
white,  with  scattered  amorphous  flammules  of  dark  or- 
ange-tan; midbody  marked  with  clear  white  band;  in- 
terior of  aperture  white;  protoconch  and  early  whorls 
dark  orange;  periostracum  thin,  tan,  silky  in  texture. 

Etymology:  Named  for  the  city  of  Portobelo,  off  of 
which  the  holotype  was  collected. 

Discussion:  At  first  glance,  Conus  portobeloensis  ap- 
pears to  be  related  to  the  C.  garciai-ernesti-cingulatus 
species  complex,  particularly  in  color  pattern.  Based  upon 
the  presence  of  a  shoulder  carina  and  a  subp\  rif  orm  body 
form,  however,  C.  portobeloensis  appears  to  be  more 
closely  related  to  C.  commodus  A.  Adams,  1854  (reil- 
lustrated  by  Petuch,  1987:  plate  10,  figures  18,  19)  from 
off  Roatan  Island,  Honduras,  and  may  be  the  Panama- 
nian analogue.  Conus  portobeloensis  differs  from  the 
Honduran  species  in  being  a  larger,  more  elongated  shell 
and  in  having  a  color  pattern  of  orange-tan  flammules 
and  dots.  The  new  Panamian  species  is  also  similar  to  C. 
paraguana  Petuch,  1987  from  the  Gulf  of  Venezuela,  as 
both  species  have  an  orangish  dashed  color  pattern  and 
both  have  a  clear  white  midbody  band.  Conus  porto- 
beloensis differs  from  C.  paraguana.  however,  in  being 
a  much  larger,  broader  species  with  a  wider  and  more 
sharply  angled  shoulder. 


Conus  roseniaryac  new  species 

(figures  34,  35) 

material  examined:  HoIot>pe — Length  25  mm,  trawled 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  85  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama.  USNM  860546;  Paratype  1— length  24  mm, 
same  depth  and  locality  as  holotype,  Leonard  Hill  col- 
lection, Miami,  Florida. 

Description:  Shell  small  for  genus,  extremely  pyriform, 
turnip-shaped,  wide  across  shoulder;  shoulder  carinated; 
spire  moderateK  protracted,  with  concave  whorls;  body 
whorl  polished  and  shiny,  faintly  ornamented  with  nu- 
merous low  threads;  spire  whorls  smooth;  anterior  third 
of  body  whorl  sculptured  with  10  deeply-impressed  wide 
spiral  sulci;  body  whorl  white,  overlaid  with  dense  net- 
work of  large,  amorphous,  bright  yellow-orange  flam- 
nuiles;  some  specimens  (parat>pe)  overlaid  with  .scat- 
tered rows  of  dots;  spire  whorls  white  with  scattered 
large,  amorphous  yellow-orange  patches  and  flammules; 
ant(>rior  tip  of  shell  pale  orange;  protoconch  and  early 
w  horls  orange;  interior  of  aperture  white;  periostracum 
thin,  transparent  tan,  smooth. 


E.  J.  Petuch,  1990 


Page  69 


•12 


10 


Figure  42.  Map  of  the  southwestern  Caribbean  Sea  and  the  Panamanian  Isthmus,  show  iiig  the  ilistribution  of  Caribbean  molluscan 
faunal  subregions.  H  =  Honduran  Subregion;  B  =  Blasian  Subregion;  CV  =  Colombian-Venezuelan  Subregion  (taken,  in  part,  from 
Petuch,  1988).  Blasian  geographical  landmarks  include  the  Laguna  de  Chiriqui  (C),  Portobelo  (P),  San  Bias  Archipelago  (S),  and 
the  Golfo  de  Uraba  (U)  As  shown  here,  the  Blasian  Subregion  may  extend  northward  to  the  Costa  Rica-Nicaragua  border  area, 
in  the  vicinity  of  San  Juan  del  Norte,  Nicaragua. 


Etymology:  Named  for  Ms.  Rosemary  Adams  of  Sun- 
nymead,  California,  who  assisted  Mr.  James  Ernest  in 
the  collection  of  the  new  Blasian  species. 

Discussion:  Of  the  known  Blasian  Conidae,  Conns  rose- 
maryae  is  certainly  one  of  the  most  distinctive.  The  pyr- 
iform  turnip  shape  of  this  new  species  is  unique  among 
the  Caribbean  Panamanian  cones.  In  general  body  form, 
C.  wsemaryae  most  closely  resembles  C.  gibsonsmitho- 
rum  Petuch,  1986  from  the  Goajira  Peninsula  of  Colom- 
bia and  the  Gulf  of  Venezuela,  but  differs  in  being  a 
larger  shell  with  a  more  elongated,  tapered  body  whorl, 
and  in  being  narrower  across  the  shoulder.  Although  both 
C.  gibsonsmithorum  and  C.  wsemaryae  have  color  va- 
rieties with  rows  of  dots,  C.  rosemaryae  is  a  more  heavily 
patterned,  more  colorful  species,  with  large  orange  flam- 
mules  (as  in  the  holotype)  covering  most  of  the  shell  The 
new  species  is  also  similar  to  C.  sennottorum  Rehder 
and  Abbott,  1951  from  the  Gulf  of  Mexico  off  Yucatan, 
but  differs  in  being  a  smaller,  more  slender,  and  more 
brightly  colored  shell. 


Turridae 

Fusittirricula  Woodring,  1928 

Fusititrricula  sundcrlandi  new  species 
(figures  40,  41) 

Material  examined:  Holotype — Length  33  mm,  trawled 
by  commercial  fishermen  from  70  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860547. 

Description:  Shell  extremely  elongated,  slender,  and 
fusiform;  spire  very  elevated  and  protracted,  turriculate; 
shoulder  sharply-angled,  with  12  oval-shaped  knobs  per 
whorl  along  periphery;  subsutural  area  sloping;  body 
whorl  below  shoulder  knobs  ornamented  with  10  large 
beaded  spiral  cords;  subsutural  area  ornamented  with 
numerous  extremely  fine  spiral  threads;  margin  of  suture 
bordered  bv  bands  of  small,  closely-packed  oblong  pus- 
tules; siphonal  canal  elongated,  narrow,  straight,  orna- 
mented with  numerous  fine,  beaded,  spiral  threads,  shell 
color  uniformly  pinkish-tan;  aperture  and  columella 
white 


Page  70 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  Kevan  Suntlerlaml  of  Fort 
Lauderdale,  Florida,  who  kindly  donated  the  holotype 

Discussion:  Fusiiurricula  sunderlandi  is  most  similar 
to  the  Panamic  species,  F.  armilda  (Dall,  1908),  but  dif- 
fers ill  heiii^  a  more  slender,  fusiform  shell  with  a  more 
elongated  body  whorl.  In  F.  armilda.  the  body  whorl 
pinches-in  abruptly  at  the  junction  with  the  siphonal 
canal,  while  in  C  sunderlandi,  the  body  whorl  tapers 
gradually  into  the  siphonal  canal.  The  two  species  pos- 
sibK  form  a  cognate  pair. 

Knefasiia  Dall,  1919 

Knefastia  hilli  new  species 
(figures  38,  39) 

Material  examined:  Holot\pe — Length  50  mm,  trawled 
bv  commercial  fishermen  from  70  m  depth  off  Portobelo, 
Panama,  USNM  860548. 

Description:  Shell  large,  robust,  fusiform;  spire  very 
high,  elevated,  distinct!)  turriculate  and  scalaritorm; 
subsutural  area  flattened,  producing  stepped  spire  whorls; 
whorls  ornamented  with  8  large,  rounded,  elongated, 
\ari.\-like  axial  knobs;  body  whorl  ornamented  with  12 
large,  pustulated  spiral  cords  with  one  or  two  fine,  pus- 
tulated secondary  cords  in  between;  pustulated  cords 
overlie  large  axial  knobs;  siphonal  canal  short,  stubby, 
ornamented  with  8  large,  pustulated  cords;  fine  cords 
and  threads  present  between  main  siphonal  cords;  outer 
lip  with  numerous  lirae  along  inside  edge;  anal  notch 
small,  narrow;  shell  color  orange-brown  with  darker 
brown  knobs;  primary  cords  on  spire,  body  whorl,  and 
siphonal  canal  white  or  light  tan;  body  whorl-siphonal 
canal  junction  marked  with  wide,  dark  brown  band;  an- 
terior end  of  siphonal  canal  circled  by  wide,  dark  brown 
band;  aperture  and  columella  pale  orange-tan. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  Leonard  C.  Hill  of  Miami, 
Floritla. 

Discussion:  Knefastia  hilli  is  the  first-known  living  At- 
lantic species  of  this  primarily  Panamic  genus,  Knefastia 
hilli  is  most  similar  to  K.  olivacea  (Sowerby,  1833),  which 
ranges  from  the  Gulf  of  California  southward  to  southern 
Ecuador.  The  new  Caribbean  species  differs  from  K. 
olivacea  in  being  a  smaller  shell  with  larger  and  more 
pronounced  a.xial  knobs,  and  in  having  finer  and  more 
numerous  spiral  cords.  The  two  species,  however,  are 
very  similar  and,  no  doubt,  represent  Panamic-Carib- 
bean  cognates. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  thank  Mr.   Leonard  Hill  of  Miami,  Florida,  for  the 
donation  of  the  valuable  research  material  collected  bv 


Mr.  James  Ernest.  Thanks  also  to  Mr.  Kevan  Sunderland, 
Fort  Lauderdale,  Florida,  for  the  donation  of  the  new 
Fusiturricula  species.  Special  thanks  go  to  Mrs.  Cynthia 
Mischler,  Department  of  Geology ,  Florida  Atlantic  Uni- 
versity, for  patiently  typing  the  manuscript  and  to  Mr. 
William  Lyons,  Division  of  Marine  Resources,  Florida 
Department  of  Natural  Resources,  for  valuable  ocean- 
ographic  data  and  critical  review. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Houbrick,  J.  R.  1968.  A  survey  of  thf  littoral  marine  mollusks 
of  the  Caribbean  coast  of  Costa  Rica  Thf  Wliger  11(1): 
4-23. 

Olsson,  A.  A.  and  T.  L  McGinty  1958  Recent  marine  mol- 
lusks from  the  Caribbean  coast  of  Panama  with  the  de- 
scription of  some  new  genera  and  species.  Bulletins  of 
American  Paleontology  .39(177):5-.59. 

Petuch,  E.  J.  1980.  A  relict  caenogastropod  fauna  from  north- 
ern South  America.  Maiacologia  20(2)307-347, 

Petuch,  E.  J.  1981.  A  voiutid  species  radiation  from  Northern 
Honduras,  with  notes  on  the  Honduran  Caloosahatchian 
Secondary  Relict  pocket  Proceedings  of  the  Biological 
Society  of  Washington  94(4):  1 1 10-1130. 

Petuch,  E.  J.  1982.  Geographical  heterochrony:  contempo- 
raneous coexistence  of  Neogene  and  Recent  molluscan 
faunas  in  the  Americas.  Palaeogeography,  Palaeoclima- 
tology,  and  Palaeoecology  37:277-312. 

Petuch,  E.  J.  1987.  New  Caribbean  molluscan  faunas  The 
Coastal  Education  and  Research  Foundation.  (Charlottes- 
ville, VA,  1.54  p 

Petuch.  E  J.  1988  Neogene  histor\  of  tropical  .\merican 
mollusks.  The  Coastal  Education  and  Research  Foimda- 
tion,  Charlottesville,  VA,  217  p 

Petuch,  E.  J.  and  D.  M.  Sargent.  1986.  Atlas  of  the  living 
olive  shells  of  the  world.  The  Coastal  Education  and  Re- 
search Foundation,  Charlottesville.  WA,  253  p 

Radwiii,  G.  E.  1969.  A  Recent  molluscan  fauna  from  the 
Caribbean  coast  of  Panama  Transactions  of  the  San  Diego 
Society  of  Natural  History  15(14):229-2.36. 

Radwin,  G  E.  and  A.  D'AttiJio.  1976.  Murex  shells  of  the 
world.  Stanford  University  Press,  Stanford,  CA,  284  p. 

Valentine,  J.  W.  1973.  Evolutionary  paleoecology  of  the  ma- 
rine biosphere  Prentice-Hall,  Inc  ,  Englewood,  NJ,  511  p. 

\  ernu'ij.  i'.  J  1978.  Biogeography  and  adaptation:  patterns 
oi  marine  life  Harvard  llni\ersit\  Press.  C'ambridge,  M.'^, 
332  p, 

Vokes,  E,  H,  1975,  Cenozoic  Muricidae  ol  the  Western  M- 
lantic  Region.  Part  VI  Aspella  and  Dcrrnomurex.  Tulane 
Studies  in  Geology  and  Paleontology  11(3):121-162. 

\'okes,  E.  H.  1985.  Review  of  the  West  Coast  Aspelloids 
Aspella  and  Dermomurex  (Gastropoda:  Muricidae),  with 
the  Descriptions  of  Two  New  Species.  The  Veliger  27(4): 
430-439 

Whilmore,  F  C  and  R  H  Stewart  1965  Miocene  mammals 
ami  Central  .•\meritan  seawa\s  Science  1 48: 1 80- 1 8.5. 

Wooilring,  W.  P.  1966  The  I'anania  land  bridge  as  a  sea 
barrier  Proceedings  ol  the  American  Philosophical  Society 
110  42.5-43.3. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(2):71-75,  1990 


Page  71 


Morphological  Comparisons  of  the  Species  of 
Megapallifera  (Gastropoda:  Philomycidae) 


H.  Lee  Fairbanks 

Pennsylvania  State  I'niversit) 
Beaver  Campus 
Monaca,  PA  1.5061,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Specimens  of  all  three  species  of  Megapallifera.  M  mutabilis. 
M.  uetherbyi.  and  M.  ragsdalei.  were  collected  from  their  t\  pe 
localities.  The  external  morphology  and  reproductive  s\stem 
anatomy  of  each  of  these  species  was  compared.  Mantle  color 
and  pattern  of  M.  mutabilis  is  different  from  those  of  M.  weth- 
erbxji  and  M.  ragsdalei.  Differences  among  the  three  species  in 
penial  anatoms  and  in  morphology  of  the  lobes  in  the  upper 
atrium  support  ta.\onomic  separation  of  the  three  species. 

Keij  words:  Philomycidae;  Megapallifera,  morphology;  re- 
[jroductive-system  anatomy. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  Philomycidae  are  a  family  of  terrestrial  slugs  native 
to  the  eastern  and  south-centra!  United  States  and  eastern 
Asia.  There  are  three  genera  in  the  famiK :  Philomycus, 
Pallifera,  and  Megapallifera.  The  slugs  in  the  genus 
Philomtjciis  are  large  and  have  a  dart  sac  and  dart,  those 
in  the  genus  Pallifera  are  small  and  lack  the  dart  sac 
and  dart.  The  slugs  in  the  genus  Megapallifera  also  lack 
the  dart  sac  and  dart  and  were  first  placed  in  the  genus 
Pallifera.  Hubricht  (1956)  established  Megapallifera  as 
a  subgenus  of  Pallifera,  and  cited  five  characteristics  for 
its  species:  (1)  gray  or  white  foot  margins,  (2)  ribbed  jaw, 
(3)  large  size,  (4)  chevron-shaped  transverse  bands  on 
the  mantle,  and  (5)  a  pilaster  extending  from  the  lower 
vagina  into  the  upper  atrium.  The  latter  three  charac- 
teristics separated  Megapallifera  from  Pallifera.  Hu- 
bricht (1976)  elevated  Megapallifera  to  generic  rank, 
with  M.  mutabilis  (Hubricht,  1951),  as  the  type  species, 
and  included  M.  wetherbyi  (Binney,  1874)  and  M.  rags- 
dalei (Webb,  1950).  Webb  (1950,  1951)  discussed  the 
reproductive-system  anatomy  of  M.  ivetherbiji  and  M. 
ragsdalei  (as  a  species  and  subspecies  respectively  of 
Eitmelus),  but  data  concerning  the  internal  anatomy  of 
the  atria  and  penes  were  incomplete  or  absent.  When 
Hubricht  described  M.  mutabilis,  he  did  not  figure  the 
reproductive-system  anatomy.  Branson  (1962)  synon- 
omized  M.  mutabilis  with  M.  ragsdalei,  apparently  on 
the  basis  of  external  morphology,  without  providing  sup- 
porting data.  No  comparative  studies  have  been  con- 
ducted involving  all  three  species  of  Megapallifera. 


The  objectives  of  this  investigation  were:  (1)  to  char- 
acterize and  compare  the  external  morphologies  of  each 
of  the  species  of  Megapallifera  and  (2)  to  compare  the 
reproductive  systems  of  these  species  in  order  to  deter- 
mine species  specific  characters. 

METHODS  AND  MATERIALS 

Specimens  of  Megapallifera  mutabilis  were  collected  on 
18  May  1989  at  the  t\pe  localitv  (just  west  of  Schoolfield, 
Pittsylvania  County,  Virginia),  elevation  approximately 
150  meters,  under  loose  bark  of  dead  trees.  Specimens 
of  M.  wetherbyi  were  collected  on  23  May  1987  and  16 
May  1989  at  the  type  locality  (near  the  mouth  of  the 
Laurel  River,  Whitley  County,  Kentucky),  elevation  ap- 
proximately 245  meters,  on  sandstone  cliffs.  One  speci- 
men of  M.  ragsdalei  was  collected  on  3  April  1988  from 
the  t\pe  locality  (9.5  kilometers  east  of  Calico  Rock,  on 
State  Route  56,  Izard  County,  Arkansas),  elevation  ap- 
proximately 125  meters,  under  moss  on  a  sandstone  cliff. 
Additional  specimens  of  M.  ragsdalei.  collected  25  .-^pril 
1982,  at  Devils  Den  State  Park,  Crawford  Count),  .Ar- 
kansas (preserved  in  ethanol)  were  obtained  on  loan  from 
the  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Chicago,  Illinois 
(FMNH  210285). 

External  characteristics  were  compared  with  species 
descriptions  to  ensure  correct  identification  of  all  spec- 
imens. Mantle  color,  mantle  pattern  and  foot  margin 
color  were  compared  among  species.  The  live  specimens 
were  drowned  in  distilled  water  and  immediately  dis- 
sected. The  reproductive  svstems  of  the  specimens  dis- 
sected were  removed  and  opened  so  that  the  internal 
structure  of  the  atrium  and  penis  could  be  described. 
Measurements  were  taken  of  eight  reproductive  struc- 
tures (length  of  penis,  length  of  apical  chamber  of  penis, 
length  of  penial  retractor  muscle,  length  of  spermathecal 
duct,  length  of  vagina,  length  of  oviduct,  length  of  vas 
deferens,  and  length  of  hermaphroditic  duct).  All  ma- 
terial was  preserved  in  70%  ethanol  subsequent  to  dis- 
section. DroNMiings  and  dissections  of  the  live  specimens 
were  conducted  during  the  same  time  period  (1-12  June) 
in  each  year  to  control  for  differences  in  anatomy  at- 
tributable to  phases  of  the  life  cycle. 

All  drawings  are  tracings  of  the  systems  or  organs 


Page  72 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


<l*. 


'\^ 


^ts 


1 


2 


3 


Figures  1-3.     Mantle  patterns.   1.  Megapallifera  mutabilis.  2.  Megapallifera  wetherbyi.  3.  Megapallifera  ragsdalei.  Scale  bar 
equals  10  mm 


Table  1 .    Length  comparisons  of  eight  reproductive  structures  (means  with  ranges  in  parentheses)  and  results  of  anal\  sis  of  variance 
tests   Measurements  in  millimeters 


M.  mutabilis 

M.  wetherbyi 

M.  ragsdalei 

(N  =  3) 

(N  =  2) 

(N  =  3) 

F 

P' 

Length  of  slug- 

60  0 

71,5 

,5(),(^' 

— 

— 

(55.0-65.0) 

(68.0-75.0) 

— 

Penis 

11.6 

16,7 

13.1 

8.22 

0,026^ 

(10.7-12.6) 

(16,1-17,3) 

(11.2-15,0) 

Apical  chamber 

1.7 

2,6 

1.7 

6.74 

0.038^ 

(1.6-1.8) 

(2.2-3,0) 

(1.5-2.0) 

Penial  retractor 

146 

7.8 

8.3 

3.00 

0  139 

(10.0-20.3) 

(6.8-8.8) 

(6.7-10.8) 

Spermathecal  duct 

10.3 

13.2 

10.9 

3,11 

0  132 

(8.6-11.5) 

(11.8-14.6) 

(10.8-11.0) 

Vagina 

1.7 

1.6 

1.6 

004 

0.966 

(1.5-1.9) 

(-) 

(1.0-2.7) 

Oviduct 

9.1 

15.8 

9.4 

2.87 

0.148 

(6.8-12.6) 

(12.2-19.3) 

(6.8-11.4) 

Vas  deferens 

18.7 

34.5 

28.1 

5.48 

0.055 

(15.1-32.2) 

(29.9-39.1) 

(23.5-35.2) 

Hermaphroditic  duct 

28.9 

40.0 

23,3 

7.35 

0,032^ 

(23,8-32.2) 

(.^4. 4-155) 

(20  8-25  5) 

'  Dciir.'cs  of  freedom  2  and  5. 

-  Crawling. 

^Oniy  one  living  specimen  was  obtained. 

*  Signifii  ant  difference  at  5%  level. 


H.  L.  Fairbanks,  1990 


Page  73 


Table  2.  Results  of  the  Modified  Duncan  Multiple  Range  Tests. 
Means  (in  millimeters)  underscored  by  the  same  line  are  not 
significantly  different  at  the  5%  level.  A,  Mcgapallifera  mu- 
tahilis.  B,  Megapallijera  wcthcrlnji:  C,  Megapallifera  rags- 
dalci. 


Species 

.\ 

t: 

15 

L.ength  of  penis 

Lengtii  of  apical  chamber 

11.57 
l,(i7 

13  01 

1  73 

l(i,7() 
2,60 

Species 

C 

A 

B 

Length  of  hermaphroditic 

di 

ict 

23  33 

2S93 

39  9.) 

figured  The  reproductive  system  was  traced  from  a  spec- 
imen pinned  out  in  a  \va.\-bottom  petri  dish  and  pro- 
jected, via  an  overhead  projector,  onto  8'/2  x  H  paper. 
The  atrial  and  penial  figures  are  tracings  of  photographic 
slides  projected  onto  8'/2  x  11  paper.  Voucher  specimens 
have  been  deposited  in  the  National  Museum  of  Natural 
History.  Smithsonian  Institution  (USNM  S54012  for 
Megapallifera  ragsdalei;  USNM  854013  for  M.  weth- 
erbyi.  L'SNM  854014  for  M.  mutabilis). 

Analysis  of  variance  was  used  to  compare  the  means 
of  measurements  of  reproducti\'e  organs.  After  the  anal- 
ysis of  variance  tests  were  conducted,  a  modified  Duncan 
Multiple  Range  Test  (Kramer,  1956)  was  used  to  deter- 
mine which  means,  among  those  compared  in  a  given 
ANOX'A,  were  significantly  different. 

RESULTS 

E.XTERNAL  Characters 

All  living  specimens  attained  crawling  lengths  that  varied 
between  50  and  75  millimeters  (figures  1-3).  All  had 
some  transverse  chevron-shaped  bands  on  the  mantle 
(figures  1-3).  All  had  gray  or  white  foot  margins. 

The  mantle  color  of  Megapallifera  mutabilis  was  fawn 
or  tan  whereas  the  mantle  color  of  M.  ivetherbiji  and  M. 
ragsdalei  was  gray.  The  "spots"  that  produce  the  mantle 
pattern  were  light  to  dark  brown  in  all  three  species; 
however,  the  arrangement  of  those  spots  varied  among 
species.  Both  M.  wetherbtji  and  M.  ragsdalei  had  broad 
distinct  chevrons  in  their  mantle  pattern  (figures  2,  3). 
In  M.  mutabilis  the  mantle  pattern  was  a  series  of  spots 
that  in  some  cases  produced  vague  chevrons  on  the  man- 
tle (figure  1). 

Observed  habitat  preferences  varied  among  the  species. 
Megapallifera  mutabilis  preferred  old-growth  decidu- 
ous forest,  whereas  M.  wetherbyi  and  M.  ragsdalei  pre- 
ferred areas  in  which  sandstone  outcrops  and  cliffs  were 
common. 

Reproductive  System  Characters 

Comparisons  of  length  measurements  of  some  repro- 
ductive structures  are  shown  in  table  1.  Analysis  of  vari- 
ance tests  (table  1)  indicated  three  significant  differences 


Figures  4-6.  Genitalia,  4.  Megapallijera  wetherbyi.  .5.  Mcga- 
pallifera ragsdalei.  6.  Megapallifera  nuilahilis.  Scale  bar  e(|uals 
10  mm  .'\C,  apical  chamber;  ,-\G,  albumen  gland,  (.',.  gonad; 
HD,  hermaphroditic  duct;  L.\,  lower  atrium;  P,  penis;  PR, 
penial  retractor;  SD.  spermathecal  duct;  I'A,  upper  atrium; 
L'V,  free  oviduct;  V,  vagina;  VD,  vas  deferens. 


among  species.  For  each  of  these  tests,  the  Modified 
Duncan  Multiple  Range  Tests  (table  2)  indicated  which 
of  the  species  were  significantly  different  from  the  others. 
All  specimens  had  an  atrium  with  two  "parts",  a  lower 
atrium  and  an  upper  atrium  (figures  7-9).  The  external 
surface  of  the  lower  atrium  (lying  within  the  body  cavity) 
was  covered  with  glandular  material  (figures  4-6),  the 
internal  surface  was  relatively  smooth  (figures  7-9).  The 
color  of  the  glandular  material  on  the  outside  surface  of 
the  lower  atrium  varied  among  species:  light  orange  for 
Megapallifera  wetherbyi.  white  for  M.  ragsdalei.  cream 
for  M.  mutabilis.  The  external  surface  of  the  upper 
atrium,  in  all  specimens,  was  nonglandular,  and  had  ac- 
cessory retractor  muscles  located  near  the  origin  of  the 
vagina  (figures  4-6).  Internally,  the  upper  atrium  con- 
tained two  labia-like  lobes,  one  on  either  side  of  the 
opening  to  the  penis  (figures  7-9).  In  M.  mutabilis  these 
lobes  were  the  least  complex,  having  two  or  three  folds 
that  divided  a  lobe  into  sublobes  (figure  9).  In  M.  weth- 
erbtji the  primary  lobes  had  two  to  three  folds  (figure  7) 
whereas  M.  ragsdalei  had  four  or  fi\e  sublobes  (figure 
8). 


Page  74 


THE  NAUTLIUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  2 


Figures  7-9.  Internal  details  of  the  atria.  7.  Mcgapallifera 
wethcrbyi.  8.  Mcgapallifera  ragsdaln.  9.  Mcgapallifera  niu- 
tahilis.  Scale  bar  equals  10  mm.  AL,  atrial  lobes;  LA,  lower 
atrium;  P,  penis;  PO,  penial  opening;  SD,  spermathecal  duct; 
UA,  upper  atrium;  UV,  free  oviduct. 


The  penes  of  all  specimens  had  an  apical  chamber  at 
the  vas-deferens  end,  i.e..  a  part  of  the  penis  set  off  by 
an  internal  constriction  (figures  10-12).  The  size  of  the 
apical  chamber  varied  among  species  (table  1),  but  in- 
ternally there  was  little  variation  in  the  pattern  of  folds 
and  pilasters  among  species.  Internally,  below  the  apical 
chamber,  the  penis  of  M.  mittabilis  had  five  to  seven 
(justulose  pilasters  that  began  at  the  vas-deferens  end  and 
gradually  disappeared  at  approximately  the  midpoint  of 
the  penis  (figure  12).  The  remainder  of  the  penis,  inter- 
nally, was  pustulose.  The  penis  of  M.  ragsdalei  had  seven 
to  nine  pustulose  pilasters  that  ran  the  entire  length  of 
the  penis  (figure  11).  The  internal  penial  anatomy  of  M. 
wetherbyi  (figure  10)  was  similar  to  that  of  M.  ragsdalei 
(figure  11).  All  specimens  lacked  a  penial  sheath  (figures 
10-12). 

DISCUSSION 

The  external  characteristics,  mantle  color  and  mantle 
pattern,  of  Mcgapallifera  mutabilis  were  clearly  differ- 
ent from  both  M.  wetherbyi  and  M.  ragsdalei  (figures 
1-3).  In  addition,  the  internal  morphology  of  the  penis 
(figures  10-12)  and  the  shape  of  the  upper  atrial  lobes 
(figures  7-9)  of  M.  mutabilis  were  different  from  those 


Figures  10-12.  Internal  detail  of  the  penes  10.  Mcgapallif- 
era wetherbyi.  1 1.  Mcgapallifera  ragsdalei.  12.  Mcgapallifera 
mutabilis.  Scale  bar  equals  10  mm.  AC,  apical  chamber;  PR, 
penial  retractor;  \'D,  vas  deferens. 


of  both  M.  wetherbyi  and  M.  ragsdalei.  Significant  dif- 
ferences between  the  mean  lengths  of  the  penis  and  the 
apical  chamber  of  the  penis  (table  2)  were  demonstrated 
between  M.  mutabilis  and  M.  wetherbyi.  These  data 
support  the  species  status  of  M.  mutabilis. 

External  morphological  data  supporting  the  separation 
of  Megapallifera  wetherbyi  from  M.  ragsdalei  were  not 
conclusive  (figures  2,  3).  However,  internal  morpholog- 
ical data  supported  specific-level  separation  of  these  two 
taxa.  Mean  lengths  of  the  penis,  the  apical  chamber  of 
the  penis,  and  the  hermaphroditic  duct  for  M.  tvetherbyi 
were  significantly  greater  than  those  of  M.  ragsdalei 
(table  2).  In  addition,  the  lobes  in  the  upper  atrium  of 
the  former  were  different  from  those  of  the  latter  (figures 
7,  8).  Hubricht  (1956)  mentioned  a  pilaster  that  extended 
from  the  lower  vagina  into  the  upper  atrium  Webb 
(1950)  mentioned  a  single  pilaster  or  a  bilobed  pilaster 
in  the  upper  atrium.  Neither  author  figured  the  lobes  in 
the  uneverted  condition.  This  study  has  demonstrated 
that  there  are  two  separate  lobes  located  in  the  upper 
atrium,  one  on  either  side  of  the  opening  into  the  penis 


H.  L.  Fairbanks,  1990 


Page  75 


and  below  the  opening  into  the  vagina.  In  addition,  these 
lobes  were,  in  some  specimens,  quite  complex.  In  these 
three  species  the  most  obvious  reproductive-system  dif- 
ferences were  in  these  lobes,  i.e..  all  three  species  were 
easily  separated  on  the  basis  of  these  lobes  alone  (figures 
7-9).  Webb  (1951)  made  note  of  the  atrial  lobes  during 
studies  of  the  courtship  between  two  M.  wetherhiji.  The 
lobes  were  referred  to  as  "hoods",  in  their  everted  shape, 
and  they  appeared  to  play  a  significant  role  in  premating 
behavior.  In  view  of  the  apparent  function  of  these  lobes 
it  seems  appropriate,  for  these  three  species,  to  attach 
considerable  significance  to  atrial  lobe  differences. 

In  summary,  this  study  demonstrated  species-specific 
morphological  differences,  both  external  and  internal, 
between  Megapallifera  mutabilis,  M.  wetherbyi,  and  M. 
ragsdalei. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

Thanks  go  to  Susan  McKee,  who  was  the  onlv  person  to 
find  a  live  specimen  of  Megapallifera  ragsdalei  at  the 
t\  pe  locality.  Thanks  also  go  to  Dr.  Richard  Reeder,  who 
helped  locate  specimens  used  in  this  study,  and  provided 
valuable  comments  concerning  the  writing  of  this  paper. 
Financial  support  for  field  work  was  provided  by  grants 


from  the  Research  Development  Grant  iMind  of  Penn- 
sylvania State  University. 

LITER.4TL  RE  CITED 

Binne\,  W.  G.  1874.  On  tlie  genitalia  and  liguai  dfiititioii  of 
Pulmonata.  .Annals  of  the  Lyceum  of  Natural  Histor\  of 
New  York  11:20-46,  pis.  1-6. 

Branson,  B.  A.  1962.  The  slugs  (Gastropoda:  Pulmonata)  of 
Oklahoma  and  Kansas  u  itii  new  records.  Transactions  of 
the  Kansas  Academy  of  Science  65(2):110-119. 

Hubricht,  L.  1951.  Three  new  land  snails  from  eastern  L^iited 
States.  The  Nautilus  f55(2):57-59. 

Hubricht,  L.  1956.  Megapalliffra.  nt-w  subgenus.  The  Nau- 
tilus fj9(4):  126. 

Hubricht,  L.  1976.  Notes  on  some  land  snails  of  the  eastern 
United  States.  The  Nautilus  90(3):104-107 

Kramer,  C.  Y.  1956.  Extension  of  multiple  range  tests  to  group 
means  with  unequal  numbers  of  replications.  Biometrics 
12:307-310. 

Webb,  G  B  1950  New  and  neglected  philonncids  and  the 
genus  Eumclu.s  Bafinesque  (Mollusca.  Gastropoda,  Pul- 
monata). Transactions  of  the  American  Microscopical  So- 
ciety 69(l):54-63. 

Webb,  G  B  1951.  Notes  on  the  sexology  of  philomycid  slugs 
of  the  genus  Eumelus  Bafinesque.  Journal  of  the  Tennessee 
Academy  of  Science  26(l):73-78. 


THE  NAUTLIUS  104(2):76 


Page  76 


Ovophagy  in  Anachis  avara  (Say,  1822) 
(Gastropoda:  Columbellidae) 


\I.  G.  Harasewych 

Department  of  Invertebrate  Zoology 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560,  L'SA 


Five  strands  of  egg  cases  of  Melongena  corona  altispira 
Pilsbry  and  X'anatta,  1934,  were  collected  in  the  Indian 
River,  near  VVabasso,  Indian  River  County,  Florida  in 
July  of  this  year  and  maintained  in  a  recirculating  sea- 
water  table  together  with  appro.ximately  fifty  specimens 
of  Melongena  corona  altispira.  When  examined  after 
several  hours  in  the  seawater  table,  si.x  specimens  of  An- 
achis avara  (Say,  1822)  were  found  on  the  egg  capsules. 
The  Anachis  were  removed  and  returned  to  the  table 
approximately  one  meter  from  the  egg  cases.  The  cap- 
sules were  examined  and  placed  in  a  large  bowl,  the  rim 
of  which  e.xtended  above  the  water  level  in  the  seawater 
table  by  two  centimeters.  Seawater  flowed  into  the  bowl, 
overflowing  the  rim  into  the  table. 

The  following  morning  (12  hours  later)  four  of  the  six 
specimens  of  Anachis  avara  in  the  seawater  table  were 
again  on  the  flat  sides  of  the  egg  capsules,  each  on  the 
terminal  capsule  of  a  strand.  When  examined  under  a 
dissecting  microscope,  the  columhellids  were  observed 
to  have  penetrated  the  walls  of  the  egg  cases  near  the 
centers  of  the  capsules,  and  to  be  feeding  on  the  Melon- 
gena larvae  and  on  the  dense  inner  layer  of  albuminous 
fluid  (figure  1).  To  reach  the  egg  capsules,  the  Anachis 
had  to  crawl  past  two  large  Mercenaria  mercenaria  that 
had  been  cracked  open  and  placed  in  the  tank  to  feed 
the  Melongena. 

Although  there  was  not  sufficient  time  to  repeat  these 
observations  with  appropriate  controls,  it  seems  clear  that 
Anachis  avara  is  capable  of  locating  gastropod  egg  cases 
at  considerable  distances  by  chemosensory  means.  It  is 
unclear  whether  Anachis  avara  showed  a  preference  for 
egg  cases  over  Mercenaria  mercenaria,  or  if  it  was  de- 
terred from  feeding  on  the  bivalves  by  the  presence  of 
feeding  Melongena. 

Members  of  the  family  Columbellidae  have  extremely 
diverse  and  opportunistic  diets  that  may  consist  of  poly- 
chaetes,  small  Crustacea,  a.scidians,  hydroids,  algae,  or- 
ganic detritus  and  carrion  (Hatfield,  1979;  Taylor  et  ai, 
1980).  Taylor  (19S7)  reported  that  six  of  16  specimens 


Figure   1.     .\nachi.s  avara  feeding  on 
cunma  altispira. 


Mel, 


Hungena 


of  Mitrella  scripta  examined  contained  gastropod  eggs 
in  their  stomachs.  The  present  observations  suggest  that 
gastropod  eggs  represent  a  significant  dietar\'  item  for 
at  least  some  species  of  columhellids 

This  is  contribution  number  264  of  the  Smithsonian 
Marine  Station  at  Link  Port. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

llathekl,  E  15  1979.  Food  sources  for  Anachis  avara  (Col- 
uinhellidae)  and  a  discussion  of  feeding  in  the  family.  The 

Nautilus  93(l):40-4.3. 

Taylor,  J.  D.  1987.  Feeding  ecolog)  of  some  corninon  niter- 
tidal  iieogastropods  at  Djerba.  Tunisia  \'ir  \lillicu  •')7(1): 
1.3-20, 

Ta\l(M,  J  I),  \  J  NU.rris.  and  C  N.  Tavlor  19S0.  Food 
sptTi.ili/alioii  and  the  e\'olution  of  predatory  prosobraneh 
gastropods   J'alaeontologN  23(2):375-409. 


INSTRUCTIONS  TO  AUTHORS 


THE  NAUTILUS  publishes  papers  on  all  aspects  of  the 
biology  and  systematics  of  mollusks.  Manuscripts  de- 
scribing original,  unpublished  research  as  well  as  review 
articles  will  be  considered.  Brief  articles,  not  exceeding 
1000  words,  will  be  published  as  notes  and  do  not  re- 
quire an  abstract.  Notices  of  meetings  and  other  items 
of  interest  to  malacologists  will  appear  in  a  news  and 
notices  section. 

Manuscripts:  Each  original  manuscript  and  accompa- 
nying illustrations  should  be  submitted  in  triplicate.  Text 
must  be  typed  on  one  side  of  8'/2  x  H  inch  white  paper, 
double  spaced  throughout  (including  literature  cited,  ta- 
bles and  figure  captions),  with  at  least  1  inch  of  margin 
on  all  sides.  All  pages  must  be  numbered  consecutively. 
If  printed  on  a  word  processor,  the  right  margin  should 
be  ragged  rather  than  justified.  Authors  should  follow 
the  recommendations  of  the  Council  of  Biology  Editors 
Style  Manual,  which  is  available  from  the  Council  of 
Biology  Editors,  Inc.,  9650  Rockville  Pike,  Bethesda,  MD 
20814,  U.S.A.  The  first  mention  of  a  scientific  name  in 
the  text  should  be  accompanied  by  the  taxonomic  au- 
thority, including  year.  Latin  names  and  words  to  be 
printed  in  italics  must  be  underlined;  leave  other  indi- 
cations to  the  editor.  Metric  and  Celsius  units  are  to  be 
used. 

The  sequence  of  sections  should  be:  title  page,  abstract 
page,  introduction,  materials  and  methods,  results,  dis- 
cussion, acknowledgements,  literature  cited,  tables,  fig- 
ure captions,  figures.  The  title  page  should  include  the 
title,  author's  name(s)  and  address(es).  The  abstract  page 
should  contain  the  title  and  abstract,  which  should  sum- 
marize in  250  words  or  less  the  scope,  main  results  and 
conclusions  of  the  paper.  The  abstract  may  be  followed 
by  a  maximum  of  8  key  words.  All  references  cited  in 
the  text  must  appear  in  the  literature  cited  section  and 
\ice  versa.  In  the  literature  cited  section,  all  authors 
must  be  fully  identified  and  listed  alphabetically.  Follow 
a  recent  issue  of  THE  NAUTILUS  for  bibliographic  style, 
noting  that  journal  titles  must  be  unabbreviated.  Infor- 
mation on  plates  and  figures  should  be  cited  only  if  not 
included  in  the  pagination.  Tables  must  be  numbered 
and  each  placed  on  a  separate  sheet.  A  brief  legend  must 
accompany  each  table.  Captions  for  each  group  of  illus- 
trations should  be  typed  on  a  separate  sheet  and  include 
a  key  to  all  lettered  labeling  appearing  in  that  group  of 
illustrations. 


All  line  drawings  must  be  in  black,  high  quality  ink, 
clearly  detailed  and  completely  labeled.  Photographs 
must  be  on  glossy,  high  contrast  paper.  All  figures  are 
to  be  consecutively  numbered  (figs.  1,  2,  3,  ...  ,  NOT 
figs.  la.  lb,  Ic,  .  .  .  NOR  plate  1,  fig.  1  .  .  .).  Illustrations 
must  be  arranged  in  proportions  that  will  conform  with 
the  width  of  a  page  (6%  inches  or  171  mm)  or  a  column 
(314  inches  or  82  mm).  The  maximum  size  of  a  printed 
figure  is  6%  by  9  inches  or  171  by  228  mm.  All  illus- 
trations must  be  fully  cropped,  mounted  on  a  firm,  white 
backing,  numbered,  labeled  and  camera  ready.  The  au- 
thor's name,  paper  title  and  figure  number(s)  should  ap- 
pear on  the  back.  Original  illustrations  must  be  between 
one  and  two  times  the  desired  final  size.  It  is  the  author's 
responsibility  that  the  line  weight  and  lettering  are  ap- 
propriate for  the  desired  reduction.  Original  illustrations 
will  be  returned  to  the  author  if  requested.  Color  illus- 
trations can  be  included  at  extra  cost  to  the  author. 

Voucher  Material:  Deposition  of  type  material  in  a 
recognized  public  museum  is  a  requirement  for  publi- 
cation of  papers  in  which  new  species  are  described. 
Deposition  of  representative  voucher  specimens  in  such 
institutions  is  strongly  encouraged  for  all  other  types  of 
research  papers. 

Processing  of  Manuscripts:  Upon  receipt,  every  manu- 
script is  acknowledged  and  sent  for  critical  review  by  at 
least  two  referees.  These  reviews  serve  as  the  basis  for 
acceptance  or  rejection.  Accepted  manuscripts  are  re- 
turned to  the  author  for  consideration  of  the  reviewers' 
comments.  A  finalized  version  of  the  manuscript  is  re- 
turned to  the  editor  and  sent  to  press.  Two  sets  of  proofs 
are  sent  to  the  author  for  correction.  Changes  other  than 
typesetting  errors  will  be  charged  to  the  author  at  cost. 
One  set  of  corrected  proofs  should  be  sent  to  the  editor 
as  soon  as  possible.  Authors  with  institutional,  grant  or 
other  research  support  will  be  billed  for  page  charges  at 
the  rate  of  $60.00  per  printed  page. 

An  order  form  for  reprints  will  accompany  the  proofs. 
Reprints  may  be  ordered  through  the  editor. 

Manuscripts,  corrected  proofs  and  correspondence  re- 
garding editorial  matters  should  be  sent  to:  Dr.  M.G. 
Harasewych,  Editor,  Division  of  Mollusks,  NHB  stop  118, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  In- 
stitution, Washington,  DC  20560,  USA. 


THIS  PUBLICATION  IS  PRINTED  ON  ACID-FREE  PAPER. 


rHE  NAUTILUS 


Volume  104,  i\ umber  3 
October  11,  1990 
ISSN  0028-1344 

A  quarterly  devoted 
to  malacology. 


Marine  Bi"'"^''^"^'  laboralo: 


OCT  19 


'—  '-  Mole,  Mass.      ^ 


EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 
Dr.  M  G.  Harasewych 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 

ASSOCIATE  EDITOR 
Dr.  R.  Tucker  Abbott 
American  Malacologists,  Inc. 
P.O.  Box  2255 
Melbourne,  PL  32902 

CONSULTING  EDITORS 
Dr.  RiJdiger  Bieler 
Department  of  Malacology 
Delaware  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
P.O.  Box  3937 
Wilmington,  DE  19807 

Dr.  Robert  T.  Dillon,  Jr. 
Department  of  Biology 
College  of  Charleston 
Charleston,  SC  29424 

Dr.  William  K.  Emerson 

Department  of  Living  Invertebrates 

The  American  Museum  of  Natural 

Historv 

New  York,  NY  10024 

Mr.  Samuel  L.  H.  Fuller 
1053  Mapleton  Avenue 
Suffield,  CT  06078 

Dr.  Robert  Hershler 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 

Dr.  Richard  S.  Houbrick 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


Mr.  Richard  I.  Johnson 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Aurele  La  Rocque 
Department  of  Geology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  James  H.  McLean 
Department  of  Malacology 
Los  Angeles  County  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
900  Exposition  Boulevard 
Los  Angeles,  CA  90007 

Dr.  Arthur  S.  Merrill 
%  Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  Universilv 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Ms.  Paula  M.  Mikkelsen 
Harbor  Branch  Oceanographic 
Institution,  Inc. 
Ft.  Pierce,  FL  33450 

Dr.  Donald  R.  Moore 

Division  of  Marine  Geology 

and  Geophysics 

Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  and 

Atmospheric  Science 

University  of  Miami 

4600  Rickenbacker  Causeway 

Miami,  FL  33149 

Mr.  Richard  E.  Petit 

P.O.  Box  30 

North  Myrtle  Beach,  SC  29582 

Dr.  Edward  J.  Petuch 
Department  of  Geology 
Florida  Atlantic  University 
Boca  Raton,  FL  33431 

Dr.  David  H.  Stansbery 
Museum  of  Zoology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 


Dr.  Ruth  D.  Turner 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Geerat  J.  Vermeij 
Department  of  Geology 
University  of  California  at  Davis 
Davis,  CA  95616 


SUBSCRIPTION  INFORMATION 

The  subscription  rate  per  volume 
is  US  $25.00  for  individuals,  US 
$35.00  for  institutions.  Postage 
outside  the  United  States  is  an 
additional  US  $4.00  for  surface 
and  US  $12.00  for  air  mail.  All 
orders  should  be  accompanied  by 
payment  and  .sent  to:  THE 
NAUTILUS,  P.O.  Box  3430,  Silver 
Spring,  MD  20901. 

Change  of  address:   Please  inform 
the  publisher  of  your  new  address 
at  least  6  weeks  in  advance.  All 
communications  should  include 
both  old  and  new  addresses  (with 
zip  codes)  and  state  the  effective 
date. 

THE  NAUTILUS  (ISSN  0028- 
1344)  is  published  quarterly  by 
Trophon  Corporation,  8911  Alton 
Parkway,  Silver  Spring,  MD  20910. 

Second  Class  postage  paid  at  Silver 
Spring,  MD  and  additional  mailing 
offices. 

POSTMASTER:  Send  address 
changes  to:  THE  NAUTILI'S 
P.O.  Box  3430 
Silver  Spring,  MD  20901 


THE 


AU  T I  L  U  S 


CONTENTS 


Volume  104,  Number  3 
October  11.  1990 

ISSN  0028-1344 

-■jjrdior; 


James  H.  McLean 


Li 


A  new  genus  and  species  of  neomplialid  limpet  from  the 
Mariana  Vents  w  ith  a  review  of  current  understanding  gf 
relationsfiips  among  Neomphalacea  and  Peltospiracea 


iU 


R.  Douglas  Hunter 


Shell  dissolution  rate  in  fresh  .vater  pulmonate  snails: 
influence  of  periostracuni  and  water  chemistry        .  . 


87 


Thomas  Stahl 
David  M.  Lodge 


Effect  of  experimentally  induced  shell  damage  on 
mortality,  reproduction  and  growth  in  Helisoma  trivolvis 
(Say,  1816)  


92 


Edward  J.  Petuch 


New  gastropods  from  the  Bermont  Formation  (Middle 
Pleistocene)  of  the  Everglades  Basin   


96 


B.  A.  Marshall 


Micropilina  tangaroa,  a  new  monoplacophoran  (Mollusca) 
from  northern  New  Zealand     


105 


William  K.  Emerson 
Walter  E.  Sage,  III 


Addenda  to  "Distorsio  ridens  (Reeve,  1844);  A  synonym  of 
Distorsio  clathrata  (Lamarck,  1816)  (Gastropoda: 
Personidae)" 


108 


THE  NAUTILI'S  104(3):77-86,  1990 


Page 


A  New  Genus  and  Species  of  Neomphalid  Limpet  from  the 
Mariana  Vents  with  a  Review  of  Current  Understanding  of 
Relationships  among  Neomphalacea  and  Peltospiracea 


James  H.  McLean 

Lui  Angeles  Count)  Museum  of 

Natural  History 
900  Exposition  Boulevard 
Los  Angeles,  CA  90007,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Symmetromphalus  regularis  new  genus,  new  species,  is  de- 
scribed from  Intlrothermal  vents  of  the  Mariana  Back  Arc 
Basin.  It  differs  from  Seornphalufi  jretterae  McLean,  f9SI,  in 
having;  the  opening  of  the  mantle  cavity  directed  anteriorK 
rather  than  to  the  left,  more  numerous  epipodial  tentacles,  the 
operculum  retained  in  the  adult,  and  in  a  deep  sperm  groove 
on  the  left  cephalic  tentacles  of  males. 

The  famil)  Cyathermiidae  is  here  proposed  for  two  coiled 
members  of  the  superfamiK  Neomphalacea,  the  genera  Cya- 
thermia  and  Lacunoides.  both  of  VVaren  and  Bouchet  (1989), 
The  family  Cyathermiidae  is  characterized  by:  a  short  snout, 
a  closed  sperm  groove  along  the  left  cephalic  tentacle,  and  two 
cirri  at  the  tip  of  the  left  cephalic  tentacle 

Neomphalacea  can  be  associated  with  Peltospiracea  in  a  sub- 
order Neomphalina,  on  the  basis  of  shared  characters  (non- 
nacreous  shell,  monotocardian  heart,  bipectinate  gill,  lack  of 
ctenidial  bursicles,  similar  radula).  As  these  may  be  plesio- 
morphic  or  convergent  characters,  further  anatomical  com- 
parisons are  needed  to  establish  additional  synapomorphic  char- 
acters for  such  a  suborder  .\  fossil  record  of  the  newly  expanded 
complex  is  yet  elusive,  but  should  continue  to  be  sought. 

Key  words:  .\rchaeogastropoda;  Neomphalacea;  Symmetrom- 
phalus, Cyathermiidae;  Peltospiracea;  hydrothermal-vent  lim- 
pets; Mariana  Vents. 


INTRODUCTION 

Neomphalus  fretterae  McLean,  1981,  the  largest  and 
most  densely  aggregated  of  hvdrothermal-vent  limpets, 
was  the  first  vent-limpet  to  be  described  (McLean,  1981). 
Its  anatomy  was  treated  in  an  accompanying  paper  by 
Freneret  al.  (1981).  Although  I  expected  that  additional 
species  of  Seomphalus  would  eventually  be  found  at 
other  sites,  none  were  found  until  the  fauna  of  the  Mar- 
iana Back  .\rc  Basin  was  sampled  in  1987,  at  which  time 
a  new,  monotypic  genus  in  the  family  Neomphalidae 
was  discovered.  The  primary  objective  of  this  paper  is 
to  provide  the  formal  description  of  the  new  genus  and 
species  Symmetromphalus  regularis. 


Recently,  an  affinity  with  Neomphalus  w as  recognized 
in  two  coiled  genera  described  by  Waren  and  Bouchet 
(1989)  from  Eastern  Pacific  hydrothermal  vents:  Cya- 
thermia  and  Lacunoides.  These  small-shelled,  monotyp- 
ic genera  are  regularly  coiled  and  have  many  of  the 
diagnostic  features  common  to  Neomphalus.  although 
they  share  other  unique  features,  which  indicate  that 
they  in  turn  should  be  segregated  within  their  own  fam- 
ily. Accordingly,  the  family  Cyathermiidae  is  here  pro- 
posed. 

Higher  classification  of  Neomphalacea  and  the  re- 
cently proposed  and  probably  related  Peltospiracea  Mc- 
Lean ( 1 989a)  has  been  discussed  by  Haszprunar  ( 1 988a,b, 
1989),  Waren  and  Bouchet  (1989),  and  Fretter  (1989). 
Another  objective  of  this  paper  is  to  briefly  review  the 
current  work  that  assesses  these  relationships,  noting  the 
gaps  in  our  understanding  of  anatomy  in  certain  mem- 
bers. 

My  early  interpretation  of  the  possible  fossil  affinity 
of  Neomphalus  has  generated  some  controversy ;  here  I 
take  the  opportunity  to  review  these  criticisms  and  offer 
a  revised  assessment  of  the  potential  for  a  fossil  record 
of  the  groups  treated  here. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

The  new  species  described  here  was  first  collected  w ith 
the  deep-submersible  Alvin  in  May,  1987,  at  hydrother- 
mal vents  of  the  mid-Pacific  Mariana  Back  .^rc  Basin.  A 
general  description  of  the  site  was  given  b\  Hessler  et 
al.  (1988).  Until  now,  two  other  gastropods,  Alvinocon- 
cha  hessleri  Okutani  and  Ohta,  1988,  and  Pseudorimula 
marianae  McLean,  1989b,  have  been  described  from 
these  vents. 

Limpet  specimens  were  collected  w  itli  the  mechanical 
arm  of  the  Alvin  in  the  course  of  collecting  substrate 
samples  and  general  collecting  of  all  organisms.  Material 
was  preserved  upon  reaching  the  surface  and  was  orig- 
inally fixed  for  24  hours  in  lO^c  seawater  formalin  buf- 
fered with  sodium  borate,  washed  in  fresh  water,  and 
transferred  to  70%  ethanol  (for  details  of  collecting  pro- 


Page  78 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No,  3 


cedures  see  Turner  et  ai,  1985).  Preserved  specimens 
were  sorted  at  Scripps  Institution  of  Oceanography  and 
forwarded  to  me  by  Robert  R.  Hessler. 

Radulae  were  extracted  from  preserved  specimens  af- 
ter dissolution  of  tissues  with  10%  NaOH  for  48  hours, 
air  dried  and  coated  with  gold  palladium  for  SEM  ex- 
amination. Juvenile  shells  with  protoconchs  were  ex- 
amined with  SEM.  Protoconch  lengths  were  taken  di- 
rectly from  scale  indications  for  the  SEM  micrographs. 

Repositories  of  the  t\pe  material  are  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Museum  of  Natural  History  (LACM),  the  United 
States  National  Museum  (USNM),  and  the  Museum  Na- 
tional d'Histoire  Naturelle,  Paris.  All  figured  specimens 
are  deposited  at  the  LACM. 


phalic  lappets.  Eyes  lacking,  epipodial  and  cephalic  ten- 
tacles non-papillate,  left  cephalic  tentacle  of  male  mod- 
ified to  function  as  penis,  sperm  groove  open  or  closed. 
Gonad  with  glandular  gonoducts,  dorsal  to  digestive  gland 
and  intestine;  females  with  seminal  vesicle. 

Radula  rhipidoglossate,  cusps  of  all  teeth  aligned  in 
descending  rows,  shaft  lengths  of  all  teeth  increasing 
toward  edge  of  ribbon.  Rachidian  tooth  with  shaft  broad 
at  base  and  acutely  pointed  overhanging  cusp.  Lateral 
teeth  four  pairs,  inner  surfaces  excavated  to  articulate 
with  rachidian  or  adjacent  lateral  teeth,  overhanging 
cusps  of  laterals  like  those  of  rachidian  tooth.  Marginal 
teeth  numerous,  shafts  wide  but  incompletely  separated 
at  base,  tips  deeply  serrate. 


SYSTEMATICS 

Superorder  ARCHAEOGASTROPODA 
Thiele,  1925 

Recent  authors  (Salvini-Plawen,  1980;  Salvini-Plawen  & 
Haszprunar,  1987;  Haszprunar,  1988a, b;  Hickman,  1988) 
have  discussed  the  problems  inherent  in  the  "archaeo- 
gastropod"  concept,  pointing  out  that  Archaeogastrop- 
oda,  as  traditionally  constituted  (Thiele,  1925;  Knight  et 
ai,  1960)  represents  a  grade. 

Hickman  (1988)  redefined  Archaeogastropoda  to  in- 
clude superfamilies  Pleurotomariacea,  Fissurellacea,  and 
Trochacea,  stating  that  it  was  thereby  synonymous  with 
Haszprunar's  concept  of  Vetigastropoda  Salvini-Plawen, 
1980.  However,  Haszprunar  (1988a, b)  also  included  Le- 
petodrilacea  McLean,  1988,  in  Vetigastropoda,  which 
inclusion  was  overlooked  by  Hickman  (1988)  and  also 
by  Bieler  (1990:380)  in  hiscritic}ueof  Haszprunar's  work. 
I  follow  Haszprunar  ( 1988a, b)  in  retaining  the  traditional 
meaning  of  Archaeogastropoda,  allowing  it  to  be  ex- 
pressly indicated  in  a  classification  as  an  orthophyletic 
grade. 

Superfamily  NEOMPHALACEA  McLean,  1981 

The  diagnosis  that  follows  encompasses  two  families,  the 
Neomphalidae  and  the  Cyathermiidae  new  family,  tak- 
ing into  account  the  characters  of  the  two  coiled  genera 
described  by  Waren  and  Bouchet  (1989).  It  will,  how- 
ever, need  to  be  modified  once  the  internal  anatomy  of 
all  genera  becomes  known. 

Diagnosis:  Shell  regularly  coiled  or  of  limpet  form,  lack- 
ing nacre,  periostracum  thick;  first  telcoconch  whorl  with 
oblique  aperture  and  rounded  whorls,  regularly  coiled 
in  all  genera;  protoconch  with  net-pattern  surface  sculp- 
ture; opercuhnn  multispiral  initially,  final  volution  en- 
larged, retained  at  least  through  the  first  telcoconch  whorl 
in  all  members 

Monotocardi^Hi.  ventricle  not  penetrated  by  rectum; 
left  kidney  only.  tJtenidiurn  bipectinate,  afferent  mem- 
brane lacking  or  ver\  short,  gill  axis  producing  sturdy 
free  tip,  filaments  elongate,  skeleton  lacking  bursides. 
Perioral  surface  with  transverse  furrow  extending  to  ce- 


CYATHERMIIDAE  new  family 

Diagnosis:  Shell  coiled  through  teleoconch;  sculpture 
smooth  to  finely  reticulate.  Neck  short;  short  snout  pres- 
ent; cephalic  tentacles  anterio-lateralK  directed;  en- 
larged left  tentacle  serving  as  penis,  sperm  groove  of 
enlarged  left  tentacle  closed,  tip  with  two  prominent 
cirri.  Afferent  ctenidial  membrane  ver\  short.  Cusps  of 
rachidian  and  lateral  teeth  finely  serrate,  cusp  of  ra- 
chidian tooth  much  longer  than  those  of  inner  lateral 
teeth. 

Included  genera:  Cyathermia  Waren  and  Bouchet,  1989, 
and  Lacunoides  Waren  and  Bouchet,  1989.  Cyathermia 
is  monotypic  for  C.  naticoides  Waren  and  Bouchet,  which 
is  widely  distributed  on  the  East  Pacific  Rise.  Lacunoides 
is  monotypic  for  L.  exqiiisitus  Waren  and  Bouchet,  known 
only  from  the  Galapagos  Rift. 

Remarks:  Separation  of  the  two  monotypic  coiled  gen- 
era from  the  two  monotypic  limpet  genera  is  now  ap- 
propriate at  the  familial  level,  given  that  each  of  the  two 
groups  of  genera  have  synapomorphic  characters  in  com- 
mon. Diagnostic  characters  of  the  Cyathermiidae  are  the 
short  snout,  left  cephalic  tentacle  with  closed  sperm  groove 
and  two  cirri  at  the  tip,  serration  of  rachidian  and  lateral 
teeth  and  enlargement  of  rachidian  tooth.  See  Waren 
and  Bouchet  (1989)  for  more  detailed  descriptions  of 
these  two  genera. 

Family  NEOMPHALIDAE  McLean,  1981 

Diagnosis:  Shell  coiled  through  first  teleoconch  whorl, 
changing  to  limpet  form  in  second  teleoconch  whorl; 
sculpture  of  strong  radial  ribs.  Neck  long;  snout  lacking 
in  adult;  cephalic  tentacles  posteriorly  directed;  sperm 
groove  of  enlarged  left  tentacle  open;  cirri  at  tip  of  penis 
lacking.  Cusps  of  rachidian  and  lateral  teeth  non-serrate, 
cusp  of  rachidian  tooth  of  same  length  as  those  of  inner 
lateral  teeth. 

Included  genera:  Meornplialiis  McLean,  1981,  and 
Symmetromphalus  new  genus,  Neomphalus  is  mono- 
typic for  N,  fretterae  McLean.  1981,  known  from  the 
Galapagos  Rift  (the  type  locality)  and  from  sites  on  the 
East  Pacific  Rise.  Syinmetroniphalus  is  monotypic  for  S. 


J.  H.  McLean.  1990 


Page  79 


regtdaris  new  species,  known  onl\  from  the  Mariana 
Back  Arc  Basin  vents. 

Remarks:  Diagnostic  characters  of  the  Neomphahdae 
are  the  limpet  form  of  the  mature  shell,  absence  of  snout, 
posterior  direction  of  cephalic  tentacles,  open  sperm 
groove  and  lack  of  cirri  on  the  enlarged  left  tentacle.  See 
Fretter  et  al.  (1981)  for  a  more  detailed  description  of 
anatomy  in  Neomphalus  fretterae. 

Symmetromphalus  new  genus 

Type  species:   Sijmmetromphalus  regularis  new  species. 

Description:  Shell  of  limpet  form,  mantle  cavity  and 
horseshoe-shaped  muscle  open  anteriorly;  shell  outline 
symmetrical  in  juvenile,  irregular  in  mature  specimens; 
coiled  apical  whorl  offset  to  right.  Sculpture  of  finely 
beaded  radial  ribs;  operculum  present  in  adult.  Neck 
long,  perioral  surface  with  transverse  furrows  extending 
to  cephalic  lappets.  Cephalic  tentacles  short,  posteriorly 
directed,  left  tentacle  of  male  greatK  distended,  deep 
dorsal  sperm  groove  connecting  with  groove  on  left  side 
of  neck.  Epipodial  tentacles  present  posteriorly  and  lat- 
erally. Gill  bipectinate,  afferent  membrane  lacking,  fil- 
aments elongate,  efferent  axis  of  free  tip  extended  over 
long  neck.  Radula  rhipidoglossate,  four  pairs  of  lateral 
teeth,  cusps  similar  to  those  of  rachidian  teeth,  except 
fourth  lateral  teeth  strongK'  serrate  on  outer  edge;  mar- 
ginal teeth  numerous. 

Remarks:  On  characters  of  external  anatomy,  Sym- 
metromphalus differs  from  Neomphalus  in  its:  anterior 
rattier  than  leftward  opening  of  the  mantle  ca\it>  and 
shell  muscle,  its  evenly  distributed  rather  than  posteriorly 
grouped  epipodial  tentacles,  smaller  cephalic  tentacles, 
greater  prominence  of  sperm  groove  in  enlarged  left 
cephalic  tentacle,  and  apparent  absence  of  well-defined 
food  groove.  The  shell  differs  in  ha\ing  strong  beading 
on  early  ribs  and  lacking  the  interior  ridge.  A  vestigial 
operculum  is  present  in  mature  specimens.  The  radula 
is  similar  in  both  genera. 

Most  of  these  distinctions  are  regarded  as  significant 
at  the  generic  level.  Only  the  sculptural  difference 
(prominent  beading  rather  than  smooth  ribs)  is  consid- 
ered a  species-level  difference  by  itself. 

Names  of  both  the  new  genus  and  species  emphasize 
the  regular  and  symmetrical  aspect,  in  contrast  to  the 
leftward  shift  of  the  mantle  cavit\  that  characterizes 
Seomphalus. 

Symmetromphalus  regularis  new  species 
(figures  1-17) 

Description:  Shell  (figures  1-3,  7-10,  17)  of  medium 
size  for  family  (maximum  length  14.0  mm  for  females, 
10.6  mm  for  males),  white  under  thick,  pale  tan  perios- 
tracum,  which  projects  beyond  edge  of  shell.  Profile  mod- 
eratel)  elevated;  juvenile  shell  nearly  symmetrical,  out- 
line of  mature  shell  irregular,  indicating  habitual  site  of 


attachment.  Apical  whorl  markedK  posterior  in  juvenile 
shell  (figures  11,  12),  closer  to  center  in  mature  shell. 
I'rotoconch  (figures  13.  14)  length  220  ^^\,  surface  sculp- 
ture of  irregular  network  of  low  ridges.  First  teleoconch 
whorl  rounded,  suture  deep,  coiled  through  one-half  whorl 
of  growth.  Limpet  form  attained  after  completion  of  first 
teleoconch  whorl;  growth  of  posterior  slope  beginning  at 
shell  length  of  1.5  mm.  Radial  (spiral)  sculpture  arising 
at  shell  length  of  1  mm,  consisting  of  low  primary  cords 
on  which  beading  appears  at  shell  length  of  2  mm.  Sec- 
ondary cords  arise  at  shell  length  of  about  7  mm.  quickly 
assuming  size  of  primary  cords;  cords  at  margin  very 
narrow,  retaining  beading,  interspaces  broad.  Shell  in- 
terior glossy  white.  Muscle  scar  horseshoe-shaped,  open 
anteriorly,  broad  throughout,  except  posteriori}-;  anterior 
terminations  rounded.  Apical  pit  remaining  open. 

Dimension  of  holotype  (female):  Length  12.3,  width 
10.1.  height  5.0  mm;  dimensions  of  illustrated  paratype 
(male);  length  8.4,  width  6.5,  height  3.0  mm. 

External  anatomy  (figures  4-7,  9):  Neck  long,  wide, 
dorso-ventrally  compressed,  lateral  edges  acutely  angu- 
late  (except  left  edge  deeply  grooved  in  male).  Trans- 
verse furrow  extending  laterally  above  mouth,  delimiting 
the  ventrally  positioned  oral  lappets.  E\'es  lacking,  ce- 
phalic tentacles  posteriorly  directed,  equal  and  relatively 
short  and  thin  in  females  (contracted  state);  left  tentacle 
of  male  enormously  distended,  bearing  a  deep  sperm 
groove  dorsally,  which  is  continuous  with  deep  groove 
on  left  edge  of  neck.  Females  lack  groo\e  on  left  edge 
of  neck. 

Mantle  cavity  deep,  extending  two-thirds  the  length 
of  shell  muscle  on  left  side.  Ctenidium  bipectinate,  af- 
ferent membrane  lacking  throughout  its  length,  efferent 
axis  arising  at  posterior  of  mantle  ca\  it\  on  left;  free  tip 
of  gill  separating  above  base  of  neck,  its  efferent  axis 
massive,  extending  well  anterior  of  head;  gill  filaments 
overlying  head,  greatly  elongate,  decreasing  in  length 
toward  tip. 

Mantle  margin  with  fine  papillae  corresponding  to 
radial  ribs.  Outline  of  foot  rounded;  anterior  edge  of  foot 
with  furrow  marking  opening  of  pedal  gland.  Epipodial 
ridge  encircling  foot,  extending  forw  ard  on  both  sides  to 
join  with  neck  edges;  short,  contracted  epipodial  ten- 
tacles evenly  spaced  along  ridge,  becoming  smaller  an- 
teriorly, not  extending  anteriorly  beyond  position  of  shell 
muscle.  Operculum  (figure  9)  ver>-  thin,  transparent, 
multispiral,  with  rapidK  enlarging  final  whorl,  edge 
frayed,  shed  in  some  large  females  (largest  operculum 
about  4  mm  diameter). 

In  dorsal  view  of  detached  animal,  shell  muscle  arms 
very  broad,  except  posteriorly,  where  reaching  one-fifth 
the  maximum  width:  anterior  terminations  rounded; 
mantle  skirt  thin,  show  ing  posteriormost  extent  and  out- 
line of  ctenidium;  pericardium  \  isible  as  dark  structure 
posterior  to  gill;  gonad  and  pallial  gonoducts  large,  over- 
King  digesti\e  gland,  occupying  posterior  dorsal  area 
next  to  right  arm  of  shell  muscle  (figure  4). 

Radula  (figures  15,  16)  rhipidoglossate,  rachidian  and 


Page  80 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


Figures  1-10.  Synunetjomphalus  regulari,  new  species,  trom  .\lice  Springs  vents,  Mariana  Back  Arc  Basin,  Alvin  dive  184,3, 
3,640  m.  Anterior  at  top  in  dorsal  and  ventral  views.  1-6.  Holotype  (female),  LACM  2432,  shell  length  12.3  mm.  1  Shell  e.xtenor_ 
2.  Shell  interior  3.  Left  side  of  shell.  4.  Dorsal  view  of  detached  bod>  .5.  Ventral  view  of  detached  body.  6.  Left  la  era  view  ot 
detached  body.  7-!0.  Paratype  (male),  LACM  2433,  shell  length  8  4  mm.  7.  Dorsal  view  of  detached  body.  8.  Shell  exterior.  9. 
Ventral  view,  animal  attached  to  shell,  showing  opercuhim  on  edge.  10.  Left  side  of  shell. 


four  pairs  of  lateral  teeth  of  similar  morphology,  mar- 
ginal teeth  numerous,  cusj-.  rows  of  all  teeth  forming 
circular  arc.  Base  of  rachidian  tooth  broad,  overhanging 
cusp  moderately  long,  tapered  to  acute  tip.  First  lateral 


tooth  slightly  less  prominent  than  rachidian  tooth,  inner 
base  behind'  that  of  rachidian  tooth.  Second,  third  and 
fourth  lateral  teeth  similar  to  each  other,  their  innermost 
bases  behind  the  base  of  adjacent  lateral  teeth;  lengths 


].  H.  McLean,  1990 


Page  81 


Figures  11-14. 
1 1.  Dorsal  view 
=  100  fim. 


Symmetromphalus  regularis  new  species.  SEM  views  of  ju\enile  paratvpe,  LACM  2433.  shell  length  3.5  mm. 
12.  Oblique,  left  lateral  view.  13.  Protoconch  and  early  sculpture,  scale  bar  =  200  tim.  14.  Protoconch,  scale  bar 


of  shafts  and  overhanging  cusps  increasing  in  length  out- 
wardly. Fourth  lateral  tooth  larger  than  third,  its  outer 
edge  sharply  serrate,  its  lowermost  serration  most  prom- 
inent. Inner  marginal  teeth  with  long,  broad  shafts,  cusp 
edges  deepK  serrate;  shafts  of  outer  marginal  teeth  in- 
completely separated. 

Type  locality:  Alice  Springs  vents,  Mariana  Back-Arc 
Basin  (18°12.6'N,  144°42.4'E),  3,640  m.  The  limpets  oc- 
cur in  dense  aggregations  on  the  walls  of  the  vents  (figure 
17).  From  the  photograph  it  is  evident  that  the  limpets 
are  oriented  randomly,  filling  all  space  on  the  substrate, 
but  not  stacked. 

Type  material:  27  specimens  from  t\pe  localitv,  Alvin 
dive  1843,  4  May  1987.  Holotype  LACM  2432,  io  para- 
types  LACM  2433,  10  paratypes  USN'M  784763,  6  para- 
types  MNHN.  All  specimens  have  undamaged  perios- 


traca,  free  of  biogenic  or  mineral  encrustations.  Males 
are  represented  by  six  specimens  only,  of  which  the 
smallest  (with  broken  shell)  is  approximate!)  .5  mm  in 
length.  Twelve  specimens  under  5  mm  in  length  are  too 
small  to  sex  w  ithout  sectioning. 


DISCUSSION 

Higher  Classification 

The  affinities  and  the  higher  classification  of  the  N'eom- 
phalacea  are  yet  to  be  fully  resolved  and  are  likely  to 
remain  controversial  for  .some  time.  Fretter  et  al.  (1981) 
aflirined  that  Seoniphalus  is  a  highly  derived  archaeo- 
gastropod,  but  could  not  relate  it  to  other  known  living 
groups.  Waren  and  Bouchet  (1989)  placed  the  newK' 
described  family  Peltospiridae  McLean,   1989,  in  the 


Page  82 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


Figures  15,  16.  Symnictroiuphdhis  rcgiiluns  iitn\  species.  .SEN!  views  of  radula  of  paratype.  15.  Full  width  of  ribbon,  showing 
rachidian,  four  pairs  of  lateral  teeth  and  numerous  marginal  teeth,  scale  bar  =  40  nm.  16.  Enlarged  view  of  overhanging  cusps  of 
rachidiaii,  laterals  and  marginals,  scale  bar  =  20  nm. 


Neomphaiacea,  whereas  McLean  {1989a),  Fretter  (1989), 
and  Haszprunar  ( 1988a, b,  as  hot- vent  group  A)  separated 
two  superfamilies:  Neomphaiacea  and  Peltospiracea. 
Shared  characters  of  both  superfamilies  include  the  mo- 
notocardian  heart,  bipectinate  ctenidia  that  lack  bursi- 
cles,  oesophageal  features,  statocysts  with  statoliths,  and 
radular  similarity.  In  having  the  left  kidney  only  and  in 
lacking  ctenidial  bursicles  both  groups  were  placed  out- 
side the  \'etigastropoda  (superfamilies  Scissurellacea, 
Pleurotomariacea,  Fissurellacea,  Haliotacea,  Trochacea, 


and  Lepetodrilacea)  by  Salvini-Plawen  and  Haszprunar 
(1987)  and  by  Haszprunar  (1988a, b).  Both  groups  were 
regarded  as  generally  more  primitive  than  the  Vetigas- 
tropoda  by  Haszprunar. 

The  main  argument  for  separation  of  Neomphaiacea 
and  Peltospiracea  concerns  the  striking  differences  in 
external  features  that  are  related  to  feeding  modes:  in 
Neomphaiacea  the  neck  is  long  and  dorso-ventrally  com- 
pressed; transverse  furrows  lead  from  the  recessed  mouth 
to  protruding  lappets  that  are  ventral  to  the  cephalic 


Figure  17.    Symmcdomplmlus  ref^ularis  new  species.  In  situ  view  of  limpets  on  basalt  boulders  in  path  of  effluent  at  Alice  Springs, 
Mariana  Back  Arc  Basin,  3,640  m.  The  largest  limpets  may  exceed  14  mm  in  length    Photo  courtesy  S  Ohta 


J.  H.  McLean,  1990 


Page  83 


tentacles  (see  Waren  &  Bouchet,  1989:  fig.  23  for  Cya- 
thermia),  and  there  is  a  notch  for  dorsal  access  to  the 
mouth  from  the  food  groove  (well-developed  only  in 
Neomphalus),  the  bipectinate  gill  is  h\pertrophied,  the 
gill  filaments  elongate  and  separated  for  filter  feeding  in 
combination  with  grazing.  In  contrast,  the  Peltospiracea 
are  known  by  the  descriptive  appellation  of  "tapersnouts,' 
which  was  first  used  by  McLean  (1985)  prior  to  their 
formal  description,  because  of  their  long,  tapered  snouts. 
The  tapered  snout  was  correlated  by  Fretter  (1989)  with 
a  well-developed,  protrusible  subradular  organ,  enabling 
the  snout  to  project  at  great  length. 

The  Peltospiridae  include  both  limpet-shaped  and 
coiled  members.  Two  important  papers  on  anatomy  of 
peltospirids  have  been  published,  that  of  Fretter  (1989) 
on  anatomy  of  the  limpets  and  the  subsequent  paper  of 
Haszprunar  (1989)  on  the  anatom\  of  the  coiled  Melano- 
drymia.  UnfortunateK  Haszprunar  did  not  have  benefit 
of  access  to  the  manuscript  of  Fretter  (1989),  so  that 
comparisons  could  not  be  made.  Melanodrymia  is  atyp- 
ical of  peltospirids  in  several  respects:  having  both  the 
left  and  right  tentacles  modified  for  copulation  (unlike 
the  peltospirid  limpets  or  other  coiled  peltospirids),  and 
lacking  skeletal  rods  in  the  ctenidium.  It  may  be  that 
Melanodrymia  is  not  a  true  peltospirid,  although  Hasz- 
prunar elected  not  to  establish  a  family  for  it. 

Anatomical  comparisons  between  all  supposed  pelto- 
spirids are  needed.  The  limpet  Hirtopelta  McLean,  1989a, 
lacks  a  tapered  snout  and  represents  a  genus  not  strictly 
peltospirid.  Another  unresolved  problem  has  been  noted: 
there  are  two  different  protoconch  tvpes  (net  sculpture 
and  longitudinallv  ribbed)  both  in  limpet  genera  and 
coiled  genera  (McLean,  1989a;  Waren  &  Bouchet,  1989). 

Knowledge  of  the  internal  anatomv'  of  Cyathermia  is 
also  needed.  Because  it  is  regularly  coiled,  it  seems  ev- 
ident that  Cyathermia  is  less  derived  and  probably  a 
better  representation  of  neomphalacean  anatomy  than 
Neomphalus,  although  the  Cyathermiidae  seem  to  have 
more  complex  reproductive  modifications  in  having  cirri 
at  the  tip  of  the  copulatory  appendage.  Symmetrom- 
phalus.  the  new  genus  described  here,  is  less  derived 
than  Seomphalus.  for  the  reason  that  its  symmetry  is 
typical  of  all  other  prosobranch  limpets,  its  torsion  not 
carried  through  an  additional  90  to  place  its  mantle  cav- 
ity on  the  left,  as  in  Seomphalus.  S'eomphalus  is  also 
more  derived  in  having  a  well-defined  food  groove  and 
a  gill  that  is  larger  and  thereby  more  effective  than  that 
of  Symmetromphalus. 

Radular  similarities  between  Neomphalacea  and  Pel- 
tospiracea need  not  inilicate  close  affinity.  Hickman  (1983) 
first  discussed  both  radular  types,  and  in  1984  reported 
that  the  radula  of  Melanodrymia  yvas  similar  to  that  of 
Neomphalus  and  that  both  could  represent  an  "unspe- 
cialized  grade  of  rhipidoglossate  radular  evolution" 
Haszprunar  (1989)  agreed  that  radular  similarities  could 
be  '"plesioniorphic  and  should  not  be  overemphasized  in 
tracing  phylogenetic  relationships.  '  A  similar  case  of  rad- 
ular uniformity  is  known  in  the  earliest  ontogenetic  stages 
of  most  trochaceans  (Waren,  1990). 


One  can  unite  the  superfamilies  Neomphalacea  and 
Peltospiracea  within  a  suborder  Neomphalina  based  on 
such  shared  characters  as  the  similarity  of  the  unspe- 
cialized  radulae,  lack  of  nacre,  and  lack  of  ctenidial 
bursicles,  but  these  are  plesioniorphic,  grade  defining 
characters.  It  is  difficult  to  identify  apomorphic  char- 
acters to  define  such  a  suborder.  We  are  left  yvith  negative 
characters  that  suffice  to  remove  both  superfamilies  from 
other  y\  ell-defined  suborders.  In  spite  of  the  present  dif- 
ficulties in  justifying  a  suborder  Neomphalina  within  a 
rigorous  cladistic  frameyvork,  I  expect  that  the  original 
hy  pothesis  of  Waren  and  Bouchet  (common  ancestry  for 
Neomphalidae  and  Peltospiridae)  will  eventually  be  ac- 
cepted. 

An  alternative  view  of  the  affinity  of  Neomphalus  was 
given  by  Sitnikova  and  Starobogatov  (1983),  in  a  short, 
unillustrated  paper  in  which  they-  placed  Neomphalus 
in  their  neyv  suborder  "Neomphaloidei"  [sic]  in  the  order 
N'ivipariformes  Sitnikova  and  Starobogatov,  1982.  A 
translation  of  the  original  Russian  has  been  obtained, 
courtesy  David  R.  Lindberg.  The  radula  of  Neomphalus 
was  said  to  lack  a  lateromarginal  plate  and  to  have  mar- 
ginal teeth  that  are  not  distributed  in  groups  of  small 
secondary  teeth  as  in  rhipidoglossate  radulae  of  trochid, 
turbinid,  and  neritid  species.  Marginal  teeth  of  Neom- 
phalus yvere  said  to  be  more  similar  to  the  marginal  teeth 
in  the  architaenioglossate  radula,  particularly  the  genus 
Leonia  in  Pomatiidae,  despite  the  fact  that  there  are 
only  tyvo  pairs  of  marginal  teeth  in  Leonia.  Other  shared 
characters  cited  yvere  elongate  mantle  cavities  and  looped 
pallial  gonoducts. 

Waren  and  Bouchet  ( 1989)  dismissed  the  Sitnikova  and 
Starobogatov  phylogeny  of  Neomphalus  as  not  to  be 
taken  seriousl)  in  the  absence  of  detailed  evidence,  and 
objected  to  the  placement  of  Neomphalus  among  the 
Mesogastropoda.  I  agree  that  a  more  convincing  expo- 
sition of  the  theory  needs  to  be  presented.  The  radular 
argument  seems  irrelevant  to  me:  why  should  the  neom- 
phalacean radula  be  structured  like  that  of  other  knoyvn 
rhipidoglossate  groups?  Nothing  is  said  to  falsify-  the  in- 
terpretation that  it  is  a  relatively  unspecialized  rhipi- 
doglossate radula.  Recently,  Golikov  and  Starobogatov 
(1988)  introduced  36  new  prosobranch  suborders  while 
maintaining  the  order  Vivipariformes  yvith  suborders 
Neomphaloidei,  Viviparoidei,  and  N'alvatoidei.  This  was 
done  yvithout  knoyvledge  of  the  later  introduction  of  Pel- 
tospiracea (McLean,  1989a;  Waren  &  Bouchet,  1989; 
Fretter,  1989)  and  of  recent  work  on  Valvatidae  (Rath, 
1988),  yvhich  resulted  in  the  placement  of  N'alvatacea  in 
the  subclass  Heterobranchia  by  Ponder  and  \\'aren  (1988). 

An  article  in  Japanese  entitled  "Neyv  archaeogastropod 
superfamily  Neomphalacea"  by  Nakamura  (1986)  is  not 
to  be  taken  as  a  proposal  of  a  homonym  for  the  super- 
family ;  rather  it  is  evidently  a  review  note  intended  for 
Japanese  readers. 

Feeding  Biology 

Haszprunar  (1988b)  suggested  that  "Neomphalus  itself 
probably  does  not  feed  by  filter-feeding  alone,  but  pos- 


Page  84 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


sibly  by  symbiotic  chemoautotrophic  bacteria  and/or  by 
grazing  bacterial  films  like  some  other  molluscs  of  the 
hydrothermal  vents.  This  is  indicated  bv  its  radula,  which 
is  not  like  those  of  typical  Biter  feeders.  ..."  Original 
reports  on  Neomphaltts  of  McLean  (1981)  and  Fretter 
et  al.  (1981)  made  it  clear  that  part  of  its  nutrition  is 
deri\ed  from  grazing,  particularly  in  the  younger  stages. 
Symbiotic  chemoautotrophic  bacteria  are  associated  with 
most  bivalves  in  the  hydrothermal-vent  community,  but 
the  onl\  \ent-associated  gastropod  for  which  this  rela- 
tionship is  known  is  Alvinoconcha  hessleri,  as  reported 
by  Stein  et  al.  (1988).  Stein  (personal  communication) 
has  informed  me  that  other  vent  limpets  have  been  sub- 
jected to  biochemical  assay  (ribulose-l,5-diphosphate 
carbo.xylase)  for  chemoautotrophic  s\nibionts,  but  the 
negative  results  were  not  published.  There  is,  however, 
a  report  by  de  Burgh  and  Singla  (1984)  of  bacterial 
colonization  of  the  gill  surface  and  direct  endocytosis  of 
the  bacteria  in  the  limpet  subsecjuently  described  as  Le- 
petodrilus  jncensis  McLean,  1988. 

Haszprunar's  comment  that  the  radula  of  Neomphalus 
is  not  like  that  of  typical  filter-feeders  is  not  relevant, 
because  the  radulae  of  filter  feeding  gastropods  in  such 
superfamilies  as  Trochacea,  Cerithiacea,  and  Calyptrae- 
acea  are  subject  to  the  phylogenetic  constraints  of  the 
radular  plans  typical  of  each  group.  A  typical  filter- 
feeding  radula  can  therefore  not  be  defined.  The  radula 
of  a  filter-feeding  gastropod  functions  primarily  to  rake 
in  a  food  string,  for  which  many  possible  morphologies 
are  suitable. 

Fossil  Record 

A  direct  fossil  record  for  any  neomphalacean  or  pelto- 
spiricean  shell  morphology  remains  to  be  established.  In 
my  earlier  assessment  of  Neomphalus  (McLean,  1981), 
I  suggested  that  there  may  be  a  link  between  Neompha- 
lacea  and  the  Paleozoic  Euomphalacea,  which  I  had 
(somewhat  rashly)  emphasized  by  placing  both  in  a 
therein  proposed  suborder  Euomphalina.  The  thrust  of 
my  argument  was  as  follow  s:  given  that  euomphalaceans 
have  been  regarded  as  immobile  and  therefore  potential 
filter-feeders  (references  in  McLean,  1981),  a  gill  like 
that  of  Neomphalacea  could  have  provided  the  mech- 
anism by  which  filter-feeding  was  possible  in  Paleozoic 
euomphalaceans. 

Although  most  subsequent  authors  have  ignored  my 
functional  argument,  Runnegar  (1983)  took  notice  of  it. 
He  did  "not  wish  to  disagree  with  an\  of  this,"  but  had 
difficulty  with  the  resulting  classificatit)n.  Batten  (1984) 
found  no  similarities  in  shell  structure  between  Neom- 
phalacea and  Paleozoic  Euomphalacea.  Bandel  (1988) 
removed  from  Euomphalacea  all  Mesozoic  genera  men- 
tioned by  McLean  (1981)  as  possible  links  between  the 
two  groups.  While  the  latter  two  authors  have  found  no 
e^  idence  supporting  the  connection,  it  can  still  be  argued 
that  a  connection  to  Paleozoic  euomphalaceans  (or  pos- 
sible related  iiroups)  through  unknown  intermediate  steps 
remains  possible.  Now  that  Cyathermia,  as  well  as  the 


entire  peltospiracean  complex,  is  known,  it  may  be  easier 
to  conceive  of  a  connection  leading  to  other  li\ing  genera. 

Sitnikova  and  Starobogatov  (1983)  stated  that  a  con- 
nection between  Neon^phalus  and  eumphalaceans  was 
falsified  because  Euomphalacea  had  paired  gills  (on  the 
basis  of  the  spiral  keel  in  some  euomphalacean  genera), 
but  that  rather  dogmatic  assumption  is  not  generally 
accepted  and  to  me  seems  poorly  founded  and  unlikely. 
The  shell  of  Ctjathermia  has  a  deep  sinus  in  the  outer 
lip  (see  Waren  &  Bouchet,  1989:  figs.  6,  7),  which  is 
undoubtedly  related  to  projection  of  the  single  bipecti- 
nate  gill.  This  evidence  suggests  to  me  that  a  hypertro- 
phied  single  gill  like  that  of  Neomphalacea  would  better 
correlate  with  spiral  keels  or  sinuses  in  the  lips  of  euom- 
phalaceans (see  McLean,  1981;  fig.  13)  than  would  paired 
gills. 

The  coiled  genera  Cyathermia  and  Lacunoides  dem- 
onstrate that  the  typical  neomphalacean  gill  and  mouth 
w  ith  dorsal  access  to  ctenidial  filaments  can  function  in 
mature,  coiled  snails.  These  coiled  snails  are  mobile,  but 
they  are  also  smaller,  of  a  size  comparable  to  the  juveniles 
of  Neomphalus  and  Symmetromphalus.  We  have  yet  to 
discover  a  larger,  coiled  member  of  the  Neomphalacea, 
but  there  is  no  reason  to  assume  that  it  could  not  function 
as  a  sedimentary  filter  feeder.  However,  we  are  not  likely 
to  find  such  a  member  of  Neomphalacea  in  the  h\dro- 
thermal-vent  habitat,  as  it  would  be  more  prone  to  shell 
crushing  by  the  brachyuran  predators  in  the  hydrother- 
mal environment. 

Now  that  we  have  recognized  major  radiations  com- 
prising the  superfamilies  Neomphalacea  and  Peltospi- 
racea,  as  well  as  the  Lepetodrilacea  (see  McLean,  1988; 
Fretter,  1988),  which  superfamily  is  not  discussed  here, 
I  continue  to  believe  it  likeK  that  these  groups  must  have 
had  a  fossil  record  in  the  Paleozoic  and  early  Mesozoic, 
the  time  at  which  all  living  archaeogastropod  superfam- 
ilies diverged  (more  detailed  discussion  in  McLean,  1981, 
1985,  1988,  1989a, b).  There  are  numerous  extinct  gas- 
tropod clades  of  the  Paleozoic  and  Mesozoic,  which  are 
assumed  to  have  been  rhipidoglossate  archaeogastropods, 
for  which  the  anatomical  plan  remains  conjectural  (see 
Knight  et  al.,  1960).  The  enormously  plastic  Peltospi- 
racea  and  the  newly  expanded  Neomphalacea  have  only 
been  introduced  into  the  literature  for  slightly  over  one 
year,  hardly  enough  time  for  paleontologists  with  inter- 
ests in  Paleozoic  and  Mesozoic  faunas  to  have  searched 
for  connecting  links. 

BlOGEOGRAPHlC  IMPLICATIONS 

The  Mariana  Back  Arc  Basin  vents  are  isolated  from  all 
other  known  Indrothermal  sites,  \et  the\-  contain  some 
launal  elements  in  common  with  those  of  other  sites,  in 
addition  to  faimal  elements  found  nowhere  else.  Only 
one  moUusk,  the  lepetodrilacean  limpet  Lepetodritus  ele- 
vatus  McLean,  1988,  occurs  widely  at  vents  on  the  Ga- 
lapagos Rift  and  at  all  Indrothermal  vent-fields  on  the 
East  Pacific  Rise  as  well  as  at  the  Mariana  vents  (McLean, 
unpublished).  There  is  also  a  faunal  connection  of  the 


J.  H.  McLean,  1990 


Page  85 


Mariana  vents  to  the  vents  of  the  Mid-Atlantic  Ridge: 
Pseitdorinmla  McLean,  1989,  has  an  undescribed  con- 
gener at  the  Mid-Atlantic  Ridge  (McLean,  in  prepara- 
tion). Hessler  et  al.  (1988)  suggested  that  hvdrothermal 
vents  associated  with  past  spreading  centers  are  likeK  to 
account  for  these  wideK  disjunct  distributions.  Tuiuii- 
cliffe  (1989)  discussed  the  vicariant  events  that  shaped 
the  present  distributions  of  hydrothermal-vent  faunas 
shared  b\  the  East  Pacific  Rise  and  the  Juan  de  Fuca/ 
Gorda  Ridge  S)Stems.  The  \icariant  events  that  would 
allow  interchange  between  the  eastern  Pacific  ridge  s\s- 
tems  and  the  Mariana  Back  Arc  Basin  remain  to  be 
treated  in  the  literature.  Vast  amounts  of  geologic  time 
must  surely  be  involved,  in  view  of  the  slow,  step-by- 
step  dispersal  of  vent  archaeogastropods  that  is  necessi- 
tated by  their  lack  of  planktotrophic  dispersal  stages  (for 
review  see  Lutz,  1988). 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

Specimens  of  Symmetromphalus  regularis  were  for- 
warded by  Robert  Hessler  of  Scripps  Institution  of 
Oceanography.  I  thank  Clif  Coney  (LACM)  for  oper- 
ating the  SEM  at  the  Center  for  Electron  Microscopy 
and  Microanalysis,  Universit)  of  Southern  California. 
Pictures  of  the  preserved  specimens  are  the  work  of 
Bertram  C.  Draper,  LACM  volunteer.  I  thank  S.  Ohta 
for  the  use  of  figure  17.  Helpful  commentary  on  the 
manuscript  was  provided  by  Gerhard  Haszprunar  and 
Anders  Waren  and  by  an  anon\mous  reviewer.  I  take 
full  responsibility  for  the  opinions  expressed  here  and 
the  decisions  as  to  the  need  for  the  new  supraspecific 
taxa. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bandel,  K.  1988,  Reprasentieren  die  Euoniphaioidea  eine 
naturlich  Einheit  der  Gastropoden?  Mitteilungen  des  Geo- 
logische-Palaontologischen  Institutes  der  Universitat 
Hamburg  67:1-33. 

Batten,  R.  L.  1984.  Shell  structure  of  the  Galapagos  rift  limpet 
Neomphalus  fretterae  McLean,  1981,  with  notes  on  mus- 
cle scars  and  insertions.  American  Museum  Novitates  no. 
2776:1-13. 

Bieler,  R.  1990.  Haszprunar  s  "dado-evolutionary"  classifi- 
cation of  the  Gastropoda — a  critique  Malacologia  31(2): 
371-380. 

de  Burgh,  M.  E.  and  C.  L.  Singla.  1984.  Bacterial  colonization 
and  endocytosis  on  the  gill  of  a  new  limpet  species  from 
a  hydrothermal  vent.  Marine  Biology  84:1-6 

Fretter,  \'.  1988.  New  archaeogastropod  limpets  from  hv- 
drothermal  vents,  superfamiK  Lepetodrilacea.  Fart  2. 
.Anatomy  Philosophical  Transactions  of  the  Royal  Society 
of  London,  series  B,  319:33-82. 

Fretter,  \',  1989.  The  anatonn  of  some  new  archaeogastropod 
limpets  (superfamily  Peltospiracea)  from  hydrothermal 
vents.  Journal  of  Zoolog),  London  218:123-169. 

Fretter,  V.,  A.  Graham,  and  J  H,  McLean.  1981.  The  anat- 
omy of  the  Galapagos  Rift  limpet,  Neomphalus  fretterae. 
Malacologia  21(l-2);:337-.361. 


(;(>liko\.  A,  .\.  atid  V  1.  Slarohogatov.  1988.  Problems  of 
pin  logeii)  and  system  of  the  prosobranchiate  gastropods. 
In:  Starobogatov,  V.  I.  (ed).  Ssstematics  and  fauna  of 
Gastropoda,  Bivalvia  and  Cephalopoda.  USSR  .\cademy 
of  Sciences,  Proceedings  of  the  Zoological  Institute  187:4- 
77  [In  Russian], 

Haszprunar,  G,  1988a.  A  preliminar\  ph\logenetic  analysis 
of  the  streptoneurous  gastropods.  In:  Ponder,  W.  F.  (ed.). 
Prosobranch  ph\  logeny,  proceedings  of  a  s>  mposium  held 
at  the  9th  International  Malacologicai  Congress,  Edin- 
burgh. 1986.  .Malacologicai  Review,  Supplement  4:7-16. 

Haszprunar,  G  1988h.  On  the  origin  and  evolution  of  major 
gastropod  groups,  with  special  reference  to  the  Strepto- 
neura.  Journal  of  Molluscan  Studies  54(4):367-441. 

Haszprunar,  G.  1989.  The  anatomy  of  Melanodrymia  au- 
rantiaca  Hickman,  a  coiled  archaeogastropod  from  the 
East  Pacific  hvdrothermal  vents  (Mollusca.  Gastropoda). 
Acta  Zoologica,  Stockholm  70(3):  175-186, 

Hessler,  R,,  P,  Lonsdale,  and  J.  Hawkins,  1988,  Patterns  on 
the  ocean  Door,  New  Scientist  1 17(  160.5):47-51. 

Hickman,  C.  S.  1983  Radular  patterns,  s\stematics,  diversits , 
and  ecology  of  deep-sea  limpets.  The  Veliger  26(2):73-92. 

Hickman,  C.  S.  1984.  A  new  archaeogastropod  (Rhipido- 
glossa:  Trochacea)  from  hydrothermal  vents  on  the  East 
Pacific  Rise.  Zoologica  Scripta  13(3):19-2.5. 

Hickman,  C.  S.  1988  .\rchaeogastropod  evolution,  phylogen\ 
and  systematics:  a  re-evaluation.  In:  Ponder.  W,  F,  (ed.). 
Prosobranch  ph\  logeny,  proceedings  of  a  s\  mposium  held 
at  the  9th  International  Malacologicai  Congress,  Edin- 
burgh, 1986.  Malacologicai  Review,  Supplement  4:17-34. 

Knight,  J.  B.,  L.  R.  Cox,  A.  M.  Keen,  R.  L.  Batten,  E.  L. 
Yochelson,  and  R.  Robertson.  1960.  Systematic  descrip- 
tions (Archaeogastropoda).  In:  Moore,  R.  C.  (ed.).  Treatise 
on  invertebrate  paleontology,  Part  I,  Mollusca  1.  Geolog- 
ical Society  of  America  and  Universitv  of  Kansas  Press,  p. 
169-310. 

Lutz,  R.  .\.  1988,  Dispersal  of  organisms  at  h\drothermal 
vents:  a  review ,  Oceanologica  .Acta,  special  volume  8:23- 
29. 

McLean,  J.  H.  1981.  The  Galapagos  Rift  limpet  .Womp/ia/us: 
relevance  to  understanding  the  evolution  of  a  major  Pa- 
leozoic-Mesozoic  radiation.  Malacologia  21:291-336. 

McLean,  J,  H,  1985.  Preliminary  report  on  the  limpets  at 
hydrothermal  vents.  In:  Jones,  M.  L.  (ed.).  The  hydro- 
thermal  vents  of  the  eastern  Pacific:  an  overview.  Bulletin 
of  the  Biological  Societv  of  Washington,  no,  6:159-166, 

McLean,  J,  H,  1986  The  trochid  genui  Lindaria  Dall,  1909: 
a  filter  feeder?  American  Malacologicai  Bulletin  4:109 

McLean,  J.  H,  1988,  New  archaeogastropod  limpets  from 
hydrothermal  vents:  new  superfamily  Lepetodrilacea,  1, 
Systematic  descriptions.  Philosophical  Transactions  of  the 
Royal  Society  of  London,  series  B,  318:1-32 

McLean,  J.  H.  1989a.  New  archaeogastropod  limpets  from 
ludrothermal  vents:  new  famiK  Peltospiridae,  new  su- 
perfamiK Peltospiracea,  Zoologica  Scripta  18(l):49-66, 

McLean,  J.  H.  1989b.  New  slit-limpets  (ScLssurellacea  and 
Fissurellacea)  from  hvdrot hernial  \ents  Part  1  Systematic 
descriptions  and  comparisons  based  on  shell  and  radular 
characters.  Contributions  in  Science,  Natural  Histor\  Mu- 
seum of  Los  .Angeles  County,  no.  407:1-29 

Nakamura,  H,  K,  1986.  New  archaeogastropod  superfamiK 
Neomphalacea.  Venus,  The  Japanese  Journal  of  Malacol- 
ogy 45(2):  138-140  [review  article  in  Japanese]. 

Okutani,  T.  and  S,  Ohta.  1988.  A  new  gastropod  mollusk 
associated  with  livdrotherinal  \ents  in  the  Mariana  Back- 


Page  86 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


Arc  Basin,  western  Pacific.  V'eiuis,  The  Japanese  Journal 
of  Malacology  47(1):  1-9. 

Ponder,  VV.  F.  and  A.  Waren.  1988.  Classification  of  the 
Caenogastropoda  and  Heterostropha — a  list  of  the  famiiy- 
grnup  names  and  higher  ta.va.  /;i;  Ponder,  W.  F.  (ed.). 
Prosobranch  phylogenv ,  proceedings  of  a  symposium  held 
at  the  9th  International  Malacological  Congress,  Edin- 
burgh, 1986.  Malacological  Review,  Supplement  4:288- 
328. 

Rath,  E.  1988.  Organization  and  systematic  position  of  the 
Valvatidae.  In:  Ponder,  VV.  F.  (ed.).  Prosobranch  phylog- 
eny,  proceedings  of  a  symposium  held  at  the  9th  Inter- 
national Malacological  Congress,  Edinburgh,  1986.  Mal- 
acological Review.  Supplement  4:194-204. 

Ruiuiegar,  B.  1983.  Molluscan  phylogeny  revisited.  Memoir 
of  the  .\.ssociation  of  .Australasian  Paleontologists  1:121- 
144. 

Salvini-Plawen,  L.  1980.  A  reconsideration  of  systematics  in 
the  Mollusca  (phylogeny  and  higher  classification).  Mal- 
acologia  19:249-278. 

SaKini-Plawen,  L.  and  G.  Haszprunar.  1987.  The  Vetigas- 
tropoda  and  the  systematics  of  streptoneurous  Gastropoda 
(Mollusca).  Journal  of  Zoologv,  London  211:747-770. 

Sitnikova,  T.  Y.  and  Y.  I.  Starobogatov.  1982.  Content  and 
systematic  status  of  the  group  Architaenioglossa  (Gastrop- 
oda, Pectinibranchia).  Zoologicheskii  Zhurnal  61(6):831- 
842. 

Sitnikova,  T.  Y   and  Y.  I.  Starobogatov.     1983.    On  the  taxo- 


nomic  position  of  the  genus  Neomphalus  McLean,  1981. 
In:  Likharev,  I.  M.  (ed).  Molluscs,  their  systematics,  ecol- 
ogy and  distributions.  Abstracts  of  Conniuuiications,  The 
USSR.  Academy  of  Sciences,  Zoological  Institute,  Sev- 
enth Meeting  on  the  Investigation  of  Molluscs,  p.  23-26 
[In  Russian]. 

Stein,  J.  L.,  S.  C.  Cary,  R  R  Hessler,  S.  Ohta,  R  D.  Vetter,  J. 
J,  Childress,  and  H.  Felbeck.  1988.  Chemoautotrophic 
symbiosis  in  a  hydrothermal  vent  gastropod.  Biological 
Bulletin  174:373-378. 

Thiele,  J.  1925.  Gastropoda. /n;  Kiikenthal,  VV.  (ed).  Hand- 
buch  der  Zoologie.  de  Gruyter,  Berlin,  5(1,2):38-155, 

Tunnicliffe,  V.  1988,  Biogeography  and  evolution  of  hydro- 
thermal-vent  fauna  in  the  eastern  Pacific  Ocean.  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Royal  Societv  of  London,  series  B,  233: 
347-366. 

Turner,  R.  D  ,  R  A.  Lutz,  and  D  Jablonski.  1985.  Modes  of 
molluscan  larval  development  at  deep-sea  hydrothermal 
vents.  In:  Jones,  M.  L.  (ed).  The  hydrothermal  vents  of 
the  eastern  Pacific:  an  overview.  Bulletin  of  the  Biological 
Society  ot  Washington,  no.  6:167-184. 

Waren,  A.  1990  Ontogenetic  changes  in  the  trochoidean 
(Archaeogastropoda)  radula,  with  some  phylogenetic  in- 
terpretations. Zoologica  Scripta,  In  press, 

Waren,  \.  and  P.  Bouchet.  1989  New  gastropods  from  East 
Pacific  hvdrothermal  vents,  Zoologica  Scripta  18(1):67- 
102. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(3):87-91,  1990 


Page  87 


Shell  Dissolution  Rate  in  Freshwater  Pulmonate  Snails: 
Influence  of  Periostracum  and  Water  Chemistry 


R.  Douglas  Hunter 

Department  of  Biological  Sciences 

Oakland  University 

Rochester,  MI  48309-4401,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

The  size-specific  rate  of  shell  dissolution  was  measured  in  situ 
in  three  Michigan  lakes  that  differed  in  pH  and  calcium  con- 
centration using  shells  of  two  species  of  freshwater  pulmonate 
snails.  Physella  integra  (Haldeman  1S41 )  and  Helisoma  anceps 
(Menke  1830).  Lack  of  a  periostracum  resulted  in  significantK 
higher  rates  of  dissolution  as  did  exposure  to  lake  water  with 
either  low  pH  and/or  low  [Ca-*].  Three-factor  ANOV'A  indi- 
cated significant  effects  for  periostracum  condition  and  site  as 
well  as  significant  two  and  three-way  interactions. 

For  H.  anceps  (but  not  P.  integra)  the  periostracum  appears 
to  greatly  reduce  the  rate  of  shell  dissolution  hence  ma\'  serve 
to  reduce  shell  damage  in  acid  waters.  .Adverse  water  chemistry 
(low  pH  and  or  low  Ca'*)  has  a  much  greater  effect  on  shell 
dissolution  across  species  (CD  =  81 S)  than  does  presence  or 
absence  of  periostracum  (CD  =  4'^). 

Shell  dissolution  response  to  water  chemistry  as  well  as  the 
degree  of  periostracum  protection  differs  between  these  two 
species  of  snails.  Models  of  lake  acidification  involving  either 
Ca-*  flux  and  pool  sizes  or  mollusk  population  survival  may 
need  to  consider  such  differences. 

Key  words:  .-Acidification;  pH;  calcium;  snail;  shell;  perios- 
tracum; dissolution;  freshwater. 


INTRODUCTION 

Freshwater  mollusks  are  known  to  be  more  sensitive  to 
acidification  of  their  habitat  than  other  benthic  groups 
(Okland  &  Okland,  1986).  Although  shell  erosion  of  adult 
snails  and  certain  physiological  processes  are  influenced 
by  exposure  to  acid  waters,  the  egg  and  juvenile  stages 
are  most  severely  affected  (Zischke  et  ai,  1983;  Rooke 
&  Mackie,  1984;  Burton  e^  a/.,  1985;  Hunter,  1988,  1990). 
This  sensitivity  of  early  developmental  stages  is  also  ob- 
served in  waters  of  low  calcium  concentration  due  to  the 
importance  of  calcium  in  normal  molluscan  physiology 
(Rooke  &  Mackie,  1984;  Hunter,  1990).  It  is  now  evident 
that  the  disappearance  of  mollusk  populations  from  lakes 
or  streams  affected  by  acidic  deposition  is  due  to  re- 
cruitment failure  as  a  result  of  developmental  arrest  and 
poor  juvenile  survival  (Hunter,  1988,  1990;  Shaw  & 
Mackie,  1989).  In  contrast  to  eggs  and  juveniles,  adult 
snails  are  relatively  resistant  to  short-term  exposure  to 


moderate  (pH  5-6)  levels  of  acidity  (Servos  &  Mackie, 
1986);  however  they  commonly  develop  shell  damage, 
such  as  pitting,  as  a  result.  Longer  term  exposure  at 
slightly  higher  (but  still  subneutral)  pH  may  also  result 
in  shell  pitting.  Evidence  of  shell  dissolution  in  adult 
snails  may  therefore  provide  an  early  indication  that  the 
population  is  at  risk  from  recruitment  failure  (Hunter, 
1988).  .■\lthough  it  might  appear  that  one  could  make 
such  a  determination  based  on  measurement  of  ambient 
physico-chemical  parameters  (e.g..  pH,  [Ca'*],  dissolv- 
ed inorganic  carbon,  etc.),  such  measures  are  indirect 
indicators  of  stress  on  an  ac}uatic  mollusk  population 
hence,  at  best,  are  useful  only  as  general  indicators.  Ev- 
idence cited  in  Okland  and  Okland  (1986)  suggests  there 
is  a  wide  range  of  tolerances  to  high  [H*]  among  species 
of  freshwater  mollusks.  This  is  likeK  compounded  by 
interpopulation  variation  in  tolerance,  making  it  difficult 
to  predict  at  precisely  what  pH  level  one  would  e.xpect 
a  particular  species-population  to  begin  showing  stress. 
Results  that  examine  the  interaction  of  pH  and  [Ca-*] 
in  terms  of  adverse  effects  on  fecundity,  dexelopment, 
and  juvenile  survival  in  a  pulmonate  snail  have  been 
reported  elsewhere  (Hunter,  1990).  The  purpose  of  this 
study  was  to  measure  the  rate  of  shell  dissolution  using 
shells  of  two  species  of  freshwater  pulmonate  snails,  some 
v\ith  periostracum  (proteinaceous  outer  shell  la\ er),  some 
w  ithout  it,  in  lakes  with  different  pH  and  [Ca-*]  condi- 
tions. Interspecific  differences,  influence  of  the  perios- 
tracum, and  lake  differences  insofar  as  they  might  mod- 
iiy  the  rate  of  shell  dissolution  were  of  particular  interest. 


MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

The  shells  of  two  species  of  freshwater  pulmonate  snails 
were  used  in  this  study.  Shells  of  Physelh  ("Physa") 
integra  and  Helisoma  anceps  originated  from  Douglas 
Lake,  Cheboygan  Co.,  Michigan,  I'S.A.  Empt\  shells  from 
adult-size  animals  that  had  died  w  ithin  the  past  24  hours 
were  obtained  from  aquaria  of  concurrent  culturing  ex- 
periments. Any  remaining  debris  inside  these  shells  was 
removed  by  a  jet  of  distilled  water  into  the  aperture  after 
w  Inch  the  shells  were  air-dried.  Such  shells  had  a  fully 
intact  periostracum.  Living  snails  were  not  used  because 


Page  88 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


they  deposit  shell  even  while  previously  secreted  CaCOa 
is  undergoing  dissolution.  Hence  the  use  of  gravimetric 
methods  to  measure  rates  of  loss  would  be  confounded 
by  simultaneous  additions  to  and  removal  from  the  shell 
mass. 

Shells  w  ithout  a  periostracum  were  obtained  from  as- 
sorted shells  (probabK  <5  years  old)  that  had  washed 
up  above  water  level  where  the  periostracum  was  lost 
by  natural  (aerial)  weathering.  These  latter  shells  con- 
trasted markedly  with  those  having  an  intact  periostra- 
cum b\  lacking  most  of  the  characteristic  color  and  glossy 
sheen  of  the  shells  of  living  snails,  instead  having  a  matte, 
chalk)  white  appearance.  Shells  that  were  eroded,  pitted, 
or  strongly  discolored,  were  avoided. 

The  apertures  of  both  kinds  of  shells  were  completely 
sealed  with  silicone  aquarium  sealer  so  as  to  prevent 
erosion  of  shell  material  from  the  inner  surface  (nacreous 
layer)  of  the  shells.  This  assured  that  any  shell  loss  by 
dissolution  would  be  from  the  outer  surfaces  of  the  shell 
onK.  Shells  were  then  dried  at  10.5  ±  5  °C  to  a  constant 
weight  and  placed  into  numbered  mesh  bags  ("bridal 
veil"  of  1  mm-  mesh  size).  The  bags  were  then  enclosed 
in  styrene  plastic  boxes  with  screened  tops  and  bottoms 
and  attached  to  stakes  securely  driven  into  the  bottoms 
of  three  selected  lakes.  The  lakes  in  whicli  the  shells  were 
submerged  are  identified  below  along  w  ith  the  means  of 
three  calcium  and  pH  measurements  (taken  near  shore 
at  0.5  m).  These  study  sites  were  all  located  on  protected 
(windward)  shores. 

1.  Douglas  Lake,  Cheboygan  Co.,  MI:     high  calcium 
(35.4  mg  Ca^VD;  high  pH  (8.59). 

2.  Vincent  Lake,  Cheboygan  Co.,  MI:    low  calcium  (3.5 
mg  Ca-+/L);  high  pH  (7.78). 

3.  Lake  Nita,  Alger  Co.,  MI:    low  calcium  (3.0  mg  Ca-*/ 
L);  low  pH  (5.47). 

No  mollusks  are  presently  found  in  either  Vincent  or 
Nita;  however,  H.  anceps  (with  pitted  shells)  occurred 
in  Vincent  Lake  up  to  a  few  years  ago. 

The  experimental  design  was  factorial  with  three  sites, 
two  species,  and  two  periostracum  conditions  giving  3 
X  2  X  2  =  12  treatments.  Each  treatment  involved  ten 
replicate  shells  or  120  total  shells.  Shells  remained  in  situ 
at  0.25-0.5  m  depth  for  42  days  at  Douglas  Lake  and 
Vincent  Lake  and  45  days  at  Lake  Nita,  after  w  hich  they 
were  removed,  dried,  and  weighed.  Change  in  shell  mass 
was  computed  from  weights  before  and  after  dr\ing, 
then  (assuming  linear  weight  loss)  converted  to  a  rate  by 
dividing  by  the  number  of  days.  Since  larger  shells  lose 
more  CaC03  per  unit  time  than  smaller  shells,  small 
differences  in  starting  shell  size  among  treatments  were 
compensated  for  b>  dividing  dissolution  rate  b>  shell  size 
(maximum  shell  dimension),  hence  the  data  are  ex- 
pressed as  bi/.c-sppcific  dissolution  rate  which  is  ;ug  CaCO,, 
dissoKed  per  tma  shell  dimension  day. 

Differences  am.  mx  treatments  were  evaluated  using 
one  and  three  factor  .WOVA  and  Fishers  Protected  Least 
Significani  iWev^.ncr  Procedure  (PLSD).  The  latter  is  a 
two-stage  proc\"J.urf.  w  lere  an  overall  test  of  significance 


(standard  F-test)  is  followed  by  pairwise  comparisons  if 
the  F-test  is  significant  at  the  chosen  alpha  level  (Koop- 
mans,  1987). 

RESULTS 

Figure  1  shows  mean  size-specific  dissolution  rate  for  all 
twelve  treatment  groups.  Results  of  a  one-factor  ANOVA 
indicated  that  there  were  significant  differences  among 
treatments  (F,,,  i,,,,  =  116.99,  P  <  0.0001).  Treatment 
histograms  having  a  common  letter  are  not  significantly 
different  from  each  other  by  Fishers  PLSD  (a  =  0.05). 
These  data  indicate  that  there  are  substantial  site  and 
periostracum  effects;  e.g.,  shell  dissolution  is  minimal  at 
Douglas  Lake  (<3  /ig/'(mmday)  for  either  species 
whether  the  periostracum  is  present  or  absent.  In  con- 
trast, the  Vincent  Lake  site  (high  pH,  low  [Ca-^])  pro- 
duced dissolution  rates  that  were  intermediate,  ranging 
from  9.7  ^g/(mm-day)  for  H.  anceps  shells  with  peri- 
ostracum to27.2^g/(mmda\ )  for  H.  anceps  shells  with- 
out periostracum.  The  highest  rates  of  shell  dissolution 
occurred  at  Lake  Nita  (low  pH,  low  [Ca-*])  ranging  from 
17.7  ^g/(mm-day)  for  H.  anceps  with  periostracum  to 
58.7  /ig/(mmday)  for  H.  anceps  without  periostracum. 
Dissolution  rates  for  P.  integra  shells  with  periostracum 
were  higher  than  the  above  rates  for  H.  anceps.  Physella 
integra  shells  with  periostracum  at  Vincent  Lake  lost 
mass  at  15.1  ^g/(mmdaN )  while  those  at  Lake  Nita  lost 
mass  at  36.7  /jg/(mmday).  Without  periostracum,  how- 
ever, P.  integra  rates  were  lower  than  those  for  H.  an- 
ceps: 19.8  /xg/(mmday)  at  Vincent  Lake  and  39.7  ng/ 
(mm -day)  at  Lake  Nita. 

It  can  also  be  seen  from  figure  1  that  absence  of  a 
periostracum  in  H.  anceps  greatly  increased  the  shell 
dissolution  rate  of  that  species,  however,  in  P.  integra 
the  dissolution  rate  was  only  slightly  increased  by  lack 
of  a  periostracum.  and  the  difference  was  not  significant. 
In  H.  anceps  the  lack  of  a  periostracum  resulted  in  a 
dissolution  rate  that  is  over  two  (at  N'incent  Lake)  or 
three  times  greater  (at  Lake  Nita)  than  at  Douglas  Lake. 

The  degree  to  which  size-specific  dissolution  rate  is 
influenced  by  the  three  main  effects  (site,  species,  peri- 
ostracum condition)  is  expressed  in  table  1.  which  gives 
the  results  of  a  three-factor  ANOVA  (SPSS-X).  Since  the 
data  were  neither  normally  distributed  nor  were  the 
variances  of  the  treatment  means  equal,  a  square  root 
transformation  was  used.  Both  site  and  periostracum  con- 
dition had  significant  effects  on  size-specific  dissolution 
rate;  for  site,  F.  „):,.  =  712.84  (P  <  0.001)  and  for  peri- 
ostracum condition,  F,i  ,03)  =  63.92  (P  <  0.001).  There 
was  no  significant  effect  for  species;  i.e..  P.  integra  and 
//.  anceps  shells  had  similar  rates  of  dissolution  when 
considered  as  species  groups  across  the  three  sites.  The 
size-specific  rate  of  dissolution  was  influenced  more  by 
site  differences  than  b\  presence  or  absence  of  a  perios- 
tracum. The  coefficient  of  determination  for  site  =  81% 
whereas  that  for  periostracum  condition  =  4%. 

Table  1  also  indicates  that  there  are  significant  two- 
aiid  three-wav  interactions  between  the  main  effects. 


R   D.  Hunter,  1990 


Page  89 


a 

X) 

E 
E 


60 


50- 


40 


S^     30 


■^     20  ■ 


o 
b 


b 

T 

T 

c 

c 

_o_     g 

X. 


DL    DL    VL    VL   LN  LN 
+       -       +       -       +       - 

Helisoma   onceps 


DL    DL    VL    VL   LN    LN 

+       -       +       -       +       - 

Physella  Integra 

Figure  1.  Size  specific  shell  dissokitioii  rates  (x  ±  SE)  lor  P. 
Integra  and  H.  anceps  with  ( + )  and  without  ( — )  periostracum 
at  three  lakes:  DL  =  high  pH,  high  Ca-*  site;  VL  =  high  pH, 
low  Ca-*  site;  LN  =  low  pH,  low  Ca-*  site.  Histograms  with 
the  same  letter  over  them  are  not  siguificantK  different  bv 
Fishers  PLSD  (a  =  0.05).  N  =  10  for  all  treatments. 


Specifically,  the  shell  dissolution  rate  of  either  species  at 
a  particular  site  is  dependent  on  periostracum  condition. 
Assuming  a  constant  dissolution  rate  at  summer  lake 
surface  temperatures,  one  can  calculate  the  number  of 
days  required  for  dissolution  losses  to  equal  the  entire 
mass  of  an  average  size  shell.  Using  a  mean  dry  shell 
weight  of  70.9  mg  for  P.  Integra  and  77.7  mg  for  H. 
anceps,  it  would  take  8,273  days  and  2,472  days,  re- 
spectively, for  a  typical  adult-size  shell,  with  intact  peri- 
ostracum at  Douglas  Lake,  to  completely  dissolve.  At 
Vincent  Lake,  these  figures  are  lowered  to  424  days  for 
P.  Integra  and  768  da\s  for  H.  anceps  (both  with  peri- 
ostracum), and  at  Lake  Nita  they  are  further  lowered  to 
178  days  for  P.  Integra  and  368  days  for  H.  anceps.  The 
shortest  time  to  complete  dissolution  would  be  118  days 
for  an  H.  anceps  shell,  without  periostracum,  in  Lake 
Nita. 

DISCUSSION 

The  results  presented  herein  suggest  that  the  periostra- 
cum of  Physella  Integra  shells  offers  little  protection 
against  shell  dissolution  due  either  to  low  ambient  [Ca-*] 
or  to  low  pH.  For  Helisoma  anceps,  however,  the  pres- 
ence of  an  intact  periostracum  substantialK  reduces  shell 
loss  in  lakes  of  low  [Ca-*].  For  example,  in  Vincent  Lake 
(low  [Ca-*],  high  pH),  shell  loss  was  reduced  by  64.6% 
when  compared  to  shells  without  a  periostracum.  Simi- 
larly, at  an  acid  lake  (Lake  Nita)  where  both  low  [Ca-*] 
and  low  pH  occurred,  the  presence  of  a  periostracum 
reduced  shell  dissolution  by  69.8'^(:.  Hence  in  H.  anceps 
the  presence  of  an  intact  periostracum  may  reduce  shell 
damage  in  slightly  acid  waters. 


Table  1 .  Results  of  three  factor  ANO\'A  on  size-specific  shell 
dissolution  rate  data  tor  Physella  integra  and  Helisoma  anceps 
at  three  different  lakes  and  with  periostracum  either  present 
or  al)sent.  Data  were  square  root  transformed. 


Degrees 

of 

Mean 

Source  of  \ariation 

freedom 

square 

F 

Main  effects 

Site 

2 

265.60 

712.84* 

Species 

1 

0.00 

0  00  ns 

Periostracum 

1 

23.82 

63.92* 

Two-way  interaction 

Site  X  species 

2 

0.71 

1.91  ns 

Site  X  periostracum 

2 

17.64 

47.35* 

Species  x  periostrac\mi 

1 

14.49 

38.88* 

Three-way  interaction 

Site  X  species  x 

periostracum 

2 

9.92 

26.61* 

Error 

103 

0.37 

Total 

114 

5,78 

*P  <  0,001;  ns  =  P  >  0.05. 

The  method  used  to  obtain  periostracum-free  shells 
was  to  select  weathered  shells  from  debris  above  the  high- 
water  line.  These  w  eathered  shells  had  been  exposed  to 
sun,  dr\ing,  freeze-thaw,  etc.,  for  a  few  months/years. 
It  is  not  known  if  this  weathering  did  more  than  simply 
cause  the  loss  of  the  periostracum;  i.e.,  does  such  treat- 
ment alter  the  dissolution  rate?  If  so,  the  effect  is  likely 
to  be  small  based  on  the  fact  that  for  P.  integra  there  is 
no  significant  difference  in  dissolution  rate  between 
weathered  (=  periostracum-free)  and  unweathered  (= 
with  periostracum)  shells  at  all  three  sites  (see  table  1). 

The  periostracum  is  the  outermost  laser  of  mollusk 
shells  and  is  entireK  organic,  consisting  largeK'  of  con- 
chiolin,  a  quinone-tanned  protein  (Wilbur,  1964).  Below 
this  layer  lies  most  of  the  mass  of  the  shell  which  is 
calcium  carbonate  secreted  in  a  protein  matrix. 

Most  of  the  references  to  periostracum  function  in  the 
literature  are  to  prosobranchs  or  bivalves  (Wilbur,  1964; 
Digby.  1968;  Tevesz  &  Carter,  1980).  Fretter  and  Gra- 
ham (1962)  suggest  that,  for  prosobranch  snails  and  la- 
niellibranchs,  the  function  is  to  reduce  shell  erosion.  It 
is  not  clear  if  this  is  a  reference  to  mechanical  abrasion, 
chemical  dissolution  or  both.  In  .some  groups,  such  as 
burrowing  and  boring  bivalves,  there  is  a  substantial  peri- 
ostracum that  apparently  protects  against  mechanical 
abrasion  (Morton,  1964;  Yonge  &  Thompson,  1976).  Tev- 
esz and  Carter  (1980)  suggest  that  the  unionacean  peri- 
ostracum is  one  of  the  most  important  adaptations  of  this 
group  to  prevent  shell  dissolution.  A  variety  of  peri- 
ostracum functions  have  been  suggested  for  bivalves, 
including  minimization  of  encrusting  b\-  epizooans,  re- 
sistance to  boring  and  attack  by  other  predators,  in- 
creased stabilit)  in  the  substratum,  and  decreased  effect 
of  substratum  scour  (Bottjer  &  Carter,  1980;  Wright  & 
Francis,  1984).  .\lthough  working  w ith  h\drothermal  vent 


Page  90 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


bivalves,  Hunt  (1987)  observed  that  periostraca  might, 
among  other  functions,  provide  protection  of  the  mature 
shell  from  chemical  dissolution.  In  a  study  of  marine 
bivalves,  Swinehart  and  Smith  (1979:380)  suggested  that 
magnesium  and  iron  in  the  periostracum  could  "act  as 
a  defensive  buffer  against  degradation  from  acidic  con- 
ditions." 

In  freshwater  pulmonate  snails,  the  periostracum  is 
relatively  thin  and  generally  lacks  hair-like  projections 
that  are  found  in  certain  bivalve  groups.  There  is  little 
in  tile  literature  to  suggest  a  function  for  the  periostracum 
in  this  group  of  snails. 

Further  evidence  that  the  periostracum  provides  some 
protection  against  shell  erosion  is  derived  from  casual 
field  observations  that  pulmonates  from  stressful  envi- 
ronments often  have  deeply  pitted  shells.  It  is  likely  that 
once  a  small  area  of  periostracum  has  become  worn  away 
(usually  abraded  by  mechanical  damage)  then  the  ex- 
posed underKing  shell  dissolves  more  rapidly  than  un- 
affected areas  nearby.  The  result  is  a  pit  in  the  shell  that, 
in  time,  may  open  into  a  perforation  possibly  leading  to 
the  death  of  that  individual.  Although  e.xtensive  wear 
and  pitting  is  often  observed  in  the  umbonal  region  of 
freshwater  bivalves,  such  wear  is  likely  a  result  of  the 
physical  process  of  abrasion,  rather  than  of  chemical 
effects  (Hinch  &  Green,  1988).  Bivalve  shells,  which  are 
in  contact  with  interstitial  water  of  the  substratum  over 
much  of  the  shell  area,  are  subject  to  somewhat  different 
(moderated)  physico-chemical  conditions  than  are  pul- 
monate snails,  which  are  usually  located  on  the  surfaces 
of  stones,  vegetation,  sediment,  etc.,  hence  are  more  di- 
rect!) exposed  to  lake  or  stream  water  conditions.  Hinch 
and  Green  (1988)  argue  that  increased  shell  erosion  in 
bivalves  most  likely  results  from  physical  etching  due  to 
water  turbulence  rather  than  from  chemical  dissolution. 
However,  chemical  dissolution  rates  would  also  be  ele- 
vated by  conditions  of  water  turbulence  and  should  not 
be  ruled  out.  The  same  authors  found  that  bivalve  shell 
etching  was  not  related  to  water  chemistry  (alkalinity 
and  pH  levels)  and  it  may  be  that  the  nacroprismatic 
shell  microstructure  of  unioiiaceans  is  substantialK  more 
resistant  to  dissolution  than  that  of  freshwater  pulmo- 
nates (Tevesz  &  Carter,  1980;  Hinch  &  Green,  1988). 

It  is  not  surprising  that  contact  by  snail  shells  with 
lake  water  low  in  calcium  or  low  in  both  calcium  and 
pH  substantially  increases  the  rate  of  shell  dissolution. 
In  a  laboratory  study,  whole  animal  [Ca-*]  of  Planorbella 
trivolvis,  after  53  days  of  exposure  to  pH  4.9,  decreased 
16%  on  a  dry  weight  basis  and  14%  on  a  size-specific 
basis  (Hunter,  1988).  In  that  same  study  it  was  reported 
that  ashed  shells  (essentially  CaC^O.j  without  the  perios- 
tracum or  any  other  organic  material)  lost  ClaCO,  about 
4.6  times  faster  than  did  the  shells  of  live  animals.  One 
may  envision  the  shell  as  a  non-living  mass  of  CaCO, 
which  is  in  direct  contact  with  and  responsive  to  calcium- 
deficient  or  acid  water,  despite  being  a  part  of  a  living 
mollusk. 

What  is  perhaps  unexpected  is  that  there  is  such  a 
different  response  by  the  shells  of  the  two  species  in- 


volved in  this  study.  Comparing  the  size-specific  disso- 
lution rate  of  shells  exposed  to  X'incent  Lake  water  (low 
[C^a-^j,  circumneutral  pH)  with  that  of  shells  exposed  to 
Douglas  Lake  water  (high  [Ca-*],  slightly  alkaline  water), 
P.  Integra  showed  a  43-fold  increase  and  H.  anceps  a 
6-fold  increase  in  dissolution  rate.  In  other  words,  P. 
Integra  shells  with  intact  periostraca  were  far  more  sen- 
sitive to  dissolution-inducing  conditions  than  were  shells 
of  H.  anceps.  Interestingly,  H.  anceps  shells  were  the 
more  sensitive  of  the  two  species  to  the  absence  of  a 
periostracum.  Thus,  P.  Integra  shells  are  moderateK  sen- 
sitive to  dissolution-inducing  conditions,  whether  the 
periostracum  is  present  or  not.  In  contrast,  H.  anceps 
shells  with  periostracum  are  less  sensitive  to  dissolution 
than  those  of  P.  Integra,  but  without  a  periostracum,  H. 
anceps  shells  are  considerably  more  sensitive.  This  study 
suggests  that  the  periostracum  in  some  snail  species  {e.g., 
H.  anceps)  could  act  as  a  deterrant  to  shell  dissolution. 
In  populations  that  are  in  locations  subject  to  gradual 
acidification,  the  life  of  adults  may  be  prolonged  com- 
pared to  other  species  {e.g.,  P.  integra). 

Clearly,  either  the  paucity  of  Ca-^  ions  in  the  water 
or  relatively  low  pH  ma\  result  in  higher  rates  of  loss  of 
shell  mass  in  pulmonate  snails.  Data  from  this  study 
indicate  that  when  both  conditions  occur  (which  is  typ- 
ical of  acid  lakes)  that  the  shell  dissolution  rate  is  higher 
than  it  is  for  lakes  having  low  [Ca-^]  and  neutral  or 
alkaline  pH.  It  is  not  possible  from  this  study  to  know  if 
pH  and  [Ca-*]  are  acting  synergistically;  however  data 
from  another  study  indicate  that  such  is  not  the  case, 
i.e.,  effects  of  low  [Ca-*]  and  low  pH  on  growth  and 
fecundit)  of  snails  reared  in  the  lab  are  no  more  than 
additive  (Hunter,  1990). 

This  study  demonstrates  that  degree  of  periostracum 
protection  and  shell  dissolution  rates  may  differ  signifi- 
cantly between  species,  hence,  CaCOj  loss  cannot  be 
assumed  to  be  identical  for  all  freshwater  snails.  Such 
considerations  are  of  potential  interest  in  the  modeling 
of  lake  acidification  processes  either  in  terms  of  the  dis- 
appearance of  specific  molluscan  taxa  from  the  benthos 
in  a  regime  of  continual  pH  and  alkalinit\  reduction  or 
calcium  release  by  biota  to  free  ion  pools. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  would  like  to  thank  the  Oakland  I'niversity  Research 
Committee  for  the  Faculty  Research  Fellowship  that 
enabled  me  to  work  at  the  I'niversitN  of  Michigan  Bio- 
logical Station  in  Summer,  1986,  and  the  staff  at  UMBS, 
especially  Bob  Vande  Kopple,  for  their  cooperation  and 
expert  assistance.  Thanks  are  also  due  to  Mary  Coffey 
(OU  Mathematics),  who  helped  with  the  statistical  meth- 
ods. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bottjer.  D.  J.  ainl  J.  G,  Charter,     1980.    Functional  and  pliyio- 
geiietic  signilicanee  ol  prdjctlint;  pfriostiucai  structures  in 


R.  D.  Hunter,  1990 


Page  91 


tile  BivaKia  (Mollusca).  Journal  t)f  Paleontolog\  5-1:200- 
216, 

Burton,  T.  M,,  H,  M.  Stanford,  and  J  W  .Mien.  1985.  Acid- 
ification effects  on  stream  biota  and  organic  matter  pro- 
cessing. Canadian  Journal  of  Fisheries  and  .Aquatic  Science 
42:669-675. 

Digby,  P.  S  B.  196S  The  mechanism  of  calcification  in  the 
molluscan  shell.  In:  Fretter,  \'.  (ed.).  Studies  in  the  struc- 
ture, physiologN ,  and  ecolog\  of  molluscs.  .\cai!emic  Press, 
New  York,  p.  93-107. 

Fretter,  V.  and  A.  Graham.  1962.  British  prosobranch  mol- 
luscs. Ray  Society,  London.  755  p. 

Hinch,  S.  G.  and  R.  H.  Green.  1988.  Shell  etching  on  clams 
from  low-alkalinity  Ontario  lakes:  a  physical  or  chemical 
process?  Canadian  Journal  of  Fisheries  and  Aquatic  Sci- 
ence 45:2110-2113. 

Hunt,  S,  1987.  .^mino  acid  composition  of  periostracal  pro- 
teins from  molluscs  living  in  the  \  icinit\  ot  deep  sea  hy- 
drothermal  \ents.  Comparati\e  Biochemistry  and  Physi- 
ology 886:1013-1022. 

Hunter,  R.  D.  1988.  Effects  of  acid  water  on  shells,  embryos, 
and  juyenile  survival  of  Planorbella  trivolvis  (Gastropoda: 
Pulmonata):  a  laboratory  stud\  Journal  of  Freshwater 
Ecology  4:315-327. 

Hunter,  R  D.  1990  Effects  of  low  pH  and  low  calcium 
concentration  on  the  puhnonate  snail.  Planorbella  trivol- 
vis: a  laborator\'  study.  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  68: 
1578-1583. 

Koopmans,  L.  H.  1987.  Introduction  to  contemporary  statis- 
tical methods,  2nd  ed.  Duxbury  Press,  Boston,  MA. 

Morton,  J.  E.  1964.  Locomotion.  In:  Wilbur,  K.  M.  and  C. 
M.  Yonge  (eds.).  Physiology  of  Mollusca,  Vol.  I.  Academic 
Press,  New  York,  p.  383-423. 

Okland,  J,  and  K.  A.  Okland  1986  The  effects  of  acid  de- 
position on  benthic  animals  in  lakes  and  streams.  Exper- 
ientia  42:471-486. 


Rooke,  J  B  and  (;  L  Mackie.  1984.  Growth  and  production 
of  three  species  of  molluscs  in  six  low  alkalinit)  lakes  in 
Ontario,  Canada  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  62T474- 
1478. 

Servos,  M.  R.  and  G.  L  Mackie  1986  The  effect  of  short- 
term  acidification  during  spring  snowmelt  on  selected  Mol- 
lusca in  south-central  Ontario  Canadian  Journal  of  Zo- 
ology 64:1690-1695. 

Shaw,  M.  A  and  G  L  Mackie.  1989.  Reproductive  success 
of  Amnicola  limosa  (Gastropoda)  in  low  alkalinity  lakes 
in  south-central  Ontario,  Canadian  Journal  of  Fisheries 
and  Aquatic  Science  46:863-869, 

Swinehart,  J,  H,  and  K.  W,  Smith.  1979.  Iron  and  manganese 
deposition  in  the  periostraca  of  several  bivalve  molluscs. 
Biological  Bulletin  156:369-381. 

Tevesz,  M  J  S  and  J.  G  Carter.  1980.  Environmental  re- 
lationships of  shell  form  and  structure  of  unionacean  bi- 
valves. In:  Rhoads,  D  C.  and  R.  A  Lutz  (eds.).  Skeletal 
growth  of  aquatic  organisms.  Plenum  Press.  New  York,  p. 
295-322. 

Wilbur,  K  M.  1964.  Shell  formation  and  regeneration  In: 
Wilbur,  K.  M.  and  C.  M.  Yonge  (eds.).  Physiology  of  Mol- 
lusca, \'ol,  I.  .Academic  Press,  New  York,  p.  243-282. 

Wright,  M.  M  and  L.  Francis.  1984.  Predator  deterrance  by 
flexible  shell  extensions  of  the  horse  mussel.  Modiolus  mo- 
diolus. N'eliger  27:140-142. 

Yonge,  C.  M,  and  T  E.  Thompson  1976  Living  marine 
molluscs.  Wm.  Collins  Sons,  Ltd.,  London.  288  p. 

Zischke,  J.  A.,  J.  W.  Arthur,  K.  J.  Nordlie,  R.  O.  Hermanutz, 
D.  A.  Standen,  and  T.  P.  Henry.  1983.  Acidification 
effects  on  macroinvertebrates  and  fathead  minnows  (Pi- 
mephales  promelas)  in  outdoor  experimental  channels. 
Water  Research  17:47-63. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(3):92-95,  1990 


Page  92 


Effect  of  Experimentally  Induced  Shell  Damage  on 
Mortality,  Reproduction  and  Growth  in 
Helisoma  trivolvis  (Say,  1816) 


Thomas  Stahl 
David  M.  Lodge' 

Department  of  Biological  Sciences 
University  of  Notre  Dame 
Notre  Dame,  IN  46556,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

We  conducted  a  replicated  laboratory  experiment  to  test  the 
potential  effect  of  shell  damage  (imitating  that  inflicted  by 
craxfish)  on  mortality,  reproduction,  and  shell  growth  of  the 
snail  Helisoma  trivolvis  (Say,  1816).  During  the  egg-laying 
period  of  the  snail,  we  removed  0,  2,  4  or  9  mm  of  shell  from 
the  aperture.  For  the  subsequent  29  days,  we  monitored  snail 
egg  production,  mortality,  and  shell  growth.  We  predicted  that 
because  of  phssiological  trade-offs,  snails  would  either  repair 
their  shell  and  show  decreased  egg  production  and  mortality 
(Hypothesis  1),  or  forego  repair  and  show  high  egg  production 
and  early  (or  high)  mortality  (Hypothesis  2). 

Results  were  inconsistent  with  both  hypotheses.  Only  shell 
growth  differed  significantly  (p  <  0.05)  among  damage  treat- 
ments, with  growth  positively  related  to  damage.  Our  data  do 
not  conclusiveK  refute  the  trade-off  assumption.  However,  the 
results  tlo  strongly  suggest  that  non-lethal  shell  damage,  like 
that  indicted  by  crayfish,  is  unlikely  to  affect  snail  population 
growth. 

Key  words:  Helisoma,  Orconectes,  predation,  damage,  trade- 
off, repair,  snails,  crayfish. 


INTRODUCTION 

Snails  and  their  predators  have  coevolved  in  ways  that 
enhance  their  ability  to  survive  predation  and  to  catch 
prey,  respectively  (Vermeij  and  Covich,  1978).  The  im- 
portance of  predation  on  marine  snails  is  supported  by 
an  abundance  of  observations  (Norton,  1988;  Raffaelli, 
1978;  Vermeij,  1979,  1982;  Vermeij  and  Covich,  1978) 
and  experimental  evidence  (Garrity  et  ai.  1986).  Fresh- 
water gastropods,  however,  have  developed  far  fewer 
antipredatory  shell  features  than  marine  gastropods,  per- 
haps because  of  limited  minerals  in  fresh  water,  insuf- 
ficient time  for  coevolution  (due  to  the  relatively  young 
age  of  most  freshwater  bodies),  and  a  lower  diversity  of 
predators  in  fresh  water  (Vermeij  and  Covich,  1978). 


'  Author  to  whom  correspondence  should  be  addressed. 


Recent  evidence  suggests,  though,  that  freshw  ater  snails 
are  readily  eaten  by  both  shell-invading  predators  like 
leeches  (Brown  and  Strouse,  1988)  and  shell-crushing 
predators  like  redear  sunfish  (Stein  ct  at..  1984),  pump- 
kinseed  sunfish  (Osenberg  and  Mittelbach,  1989),  and 
crayfish  (Crowl,  1989;  Lodge  and  Lorman,  1987;  Olsen, 
1989;  Weber  and  Lodge,  1990).  Probably  because  of  their 
relatively  high  feeding  rate,  e.g.,  50-200  Hydrobiaciay- 
fish  '-day  '  (Olsen,  1989),  and  frequently  high  densities 
(Lodge  et  ai,  1987),  crayfish  (Orconectes  spp. )  appear 
to  be  particularly  potent  predators  of  snails.  Field  ob- 
servations (Weber  and  Lodge,  1990)  and  experimental 
(Lodge  and  Lorman,  1987;  Lodge,  unpublished  data) 
evidence  suggest  that  crayfish  predation  influences  abun- 
dance and  species  composition  of  snails  in  northern  Wis- 
consin lakes.  Indirect  effects  of  predation,  such  as  the 
non-lethal  shell  damage  documented  extensiveK  for  ma- 
rine snails  (Geller,  1990;  Raffaelli,  1978;  Vermeij,  1982; 
Vermeij  et  ai,  1980;  Vale  and  Rex,  1989;  Zipser  and 
Vermeij,  1980),  may  have  an  impact  on  snail  populations 
by  reducing  individual  fitness.  An  experimental  test  of 
this  possibility,  which  has  not  been  previously  explored 
for  freshwater  snails,  is  the  topic  of  this  paper. 

In  laboratory  experiments  in  which  freshwater  Or- 
conectes crayfish  prey  on  snails,  predation  rate  differs 
among  snail  species  (A.  P.  Covich,  personal  communi- 
cation), but  intermediate  sized  shells  (6-9  mm)  are  most 
often  non-lethally  damaged  (Olsen,  1989).  Smaller  snails 
are  almost  always  successfully  eaten;  larger  snails,  which 
have  stronger  shells,  are  not  handled  as  easily.  In  labo- 
ratory experiments,  Orconectes  rusticus  (Girard,  1852) 
(31-39  mm  carapace  length)  eat  about  7%  and  non- 
lethally  damage  (>1  mm  shell  aperture  peeled  awa\ ) 
about  25%  of  60  Helisoma  available  to  single  cra\fish  in 
one  night  (Olsen  1989).  In  this  paper,  we  test  the  impact 
on  snail  mortality,  fecundit),  and  shell  growth  of  ex- 
perimentally induced  damage  that  mimicked  the  cray- 
fish-inflicted damage  described  by  Olsen  (1989). 

Our  experiment  v\as  designed  to  test  two  opposing 
Inpotheses  regarding  the  effects  of  non-lethal  damage 
on  reproductively  active  snails.  Both  hypotheses  are  built 


T.  Stahl  and  D.  Lodge,  1990 


Page  93 


on  the  assumption  that  trade-offs  (sensu  Tilman,  1989) 
exist  in  the  allocation  of  resources  b\'  individual  snails  to 
repair,  growth  and  reproduction.  The  trade-off  assump- 
tion, e.g.,  that  energy  spent  on  growth  decreases  energy 
available  for  reproduction,  is  a  critical  component  in 
much  ecological  and  evolutionary  thought,  to  the  point 
of  becoming  a  paradigm  (Tilman,  1989). 

Hypothesis  1  is  that  a  damaged  snail  will  divert  energy 
and  nutrients  from  growth  and  reproduction  to  repair 
its  damaged  shell.  If  this  occurs,  non-lethal  shell  damage 
b>  a  predator  might  limit  snail  populations  even  though 
the  snail  is  not  killed.  Hypothesis  2  is  that  a  snail  would 
respond  to  non-lethal  damage  by  foregoing  repair  and 
putting  all  of  its  energy  into  reproduction  (Kirkwood, 
1981 ).  This  might  be  the  expected  result  for  semelparous 
snails,  like  the  Helisoma  used  in  our  experiment  (see 
Boerger,  1975  for  description  of  Helisoma  life  cycle).  If 
H\  pothesis  1  is  correct,  we  predicted  damaged  Helisoma 
would  exhibit  low  fecundity,  and  low  or  delayed  mor- 
talit\-.  In  this  case,  non-lethal  damage  might  depress  snail 
populations.  If  Hypothesis  2  is  correct,  we  predicted 
damaged  snails  would  exhibit  fecundity  similar  to  un- 
damaged snails  and  early,  high  mortality  rates.  In  this 
case,  non-lethal  damage  would  have  a  negligible  effect 
on  snail  populations. 


MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

The  experiment  was  conducted  at  the  University  of  Notre 
Dame  Environmental  Research  Center  (L'NDERC)  in 
the  Upper  Peninsula  of  Michigan  (46°N,  89°W)  during 
the  latter  part  (1  June-1  July  1989)  of  the  reproductive 
season  of  H.  trivolvis  (Boerger,  1975).  Adult  snails  (mean 
shell  diameter  of  24.6  mm,  range  =  21-29  mm)  were 
collected  from  Mullahy  and  Ward  lakes,  two  small  me- 
sotrophic  lakes  on  UNDERC  propert\ . 

This  size  range  of  snails  was  used  because  it  was  most 
available.  While  these  snails  are  larger  than  those  most 
susceptible  to  non-lethal  damage  (Olsen,  1989),  we  as- 
sume response  to  damage  would  be  similar  to  that  of 
species  w  hose  reproductive  size  is  smaller,  e.g.,  Helisoma 
campanulata  (Say). 

Shells  were  artificially  damaged  by  peeling  0,  2,  4,  or 
9  mm  ring  of  shell  from  the  aperture  with  forceps.  The 
living  tissue  of  all  snails  was  undamaged.  There  were 
seven  replicates  for  each  of  the  four  damage  treatments. 
Each  of  the  28  experimental  units  was  a  shallow  fiberglass 
tray  (30  x  35  x  8.5  cm  deep),  filled  to  a  depth  of  5  cm 
with  lake  water.  Snails  were  randomly  assigned  to  treat- 
ments, and  trays  randomly  assigned  to  a  lab  bench  po- 
sition. Trays  were  maintained  with  natural  lighting  from 
windows.  Temperature  fluctuated  in  the  range  14-21  °C. 
Each  tray  contained  10  snails  (all  with  the  same  degree 
of  damage)  and  2-3  periphyton  covered  rocks  (6-10  cm 
diameter)  to  provide  snail  food.  Food  le\el  was  kept  as 
constant  as  possible  throughout  the  experiment  by  re- 
placing water  and  rocks  about  once  per  week  (three  times 
during  the  experiment).  Snail  mortalities  and  egg  sacs 
were  counted  every  other  day.   Dead  snails  were  re- 


300  n 


200- 


O 


<  y,     1  00  - 

U 


X 

~   < 

U 


12     16     20     24     2i 


0  mm  damage 
2  mm  damage 
4  mm  damage 
9  mm  damage 


TiMK  (I).^^S) 

Figure  I.  Mean  (N  =  7)  cumulative  number  of  eggs  per  10 
snails  as  a  function  of  time.  No  significant  difference  in  total 
egg  production  (day  29)  existed  among  treatments  (.\NOV'.>\  p 
=  0  40)  Figure  2.  Mean  (N  =  7)  cumulative  deaths  per  10 
snails  as  a  function  of  time.  Mean  for  0  damage  treatment  is 
zero  from  day  0  through  day  8.  Differences  among  treatments 
in  total  mortality  (da\  29)  were  margitialK  significant  (.WOX'.^ 
p  =  0.052).  For  figures  1  and  2,  ±  1  SE  is  indicated  for  day  29 
onl\ . 


moved.  Egg  sacs  were  collected  with  a  .scalpel  from  tray 
sides,  rocks,  and  shells  of  snails.  Eggs  in  each  egg  sac 
were  counted  under  a  dissecting  microscope.  Every  snail 
was  measured  for  new  shell  growth  near  the  end  of  the 
experiment  (24  June). 

We  tested  differences  among  treatments  in  egg  pro- 
duction, mortality,  and  shell  growth  with  a  separate 
ANOVA  for  each  response. 


Page  94 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


1.2 


1.0- 


E 

^       0,8i 

s 

o 
cc 
o 

u 

X 

1/3 

z 

< 

bd 


0.6 


0.4- 


0.2- 


0.0- 


DAMAGE  (mm) 

Figure  3.  Histogram  of  mean  shell  growth  (N  =  7)  ±2  SE  for 
the  four  shell  damage  treatments  (ANOVA  p  <  0.001).  The 
horizontal  bar  connects  treatments  that  did  not  differ  (p  > 
0.05,  Tukey's  Test). 


RESULTS 

For  all  four  damage  levels,  cumulative  egg  production 
increased  through  about  day  12,  and  began  to  level  off 
thereafter  as  egg-laying  ceased  (figure  1).  No  differences 
existed  among  treatments  in  total  eggs  laid  (ANOVA  p 
=  0.40  for  day  29  data). 

Mortality  was  very  low  in  all  treatments  through  the 
egg-laying  period,  and  began  to  increase  in  all  treatments 
after  egg-laying  ceased  (figure  2).  On  day  29,  there  was 
a  marginally  significant  difference  among  treatments  in 
total  mortality  (ANOVA  p  =  0.052),  but  the  apparent 
rank  order  of  mortality  was  not  correlated  to  inflicted 
damage  levels. 

Shells  in  all  treatments  grew  during  the  experiment, 
with  growth  differing  among  treatments  (ANOVA  p  < 
0.001)  and  generally  positively  related  to  damage  level 
(figure  3).  Regrown  shell  on  damaged  snails  was  very 
thin  compared  to  the  rest  of  the  shell.  This,  along  witli 
the  original  fracture  line,  made  it  easy  to  measure  growth 
on  damaged  snails.  On  control  snails,  however,  new 
growth  often  blended  in  with  the  old  shell,  rendering 
uncertain  our  growth  measurements  for  the  control  treat- 
ment. Even  if  control  growth  data  were  removed  from 
consideration,  the  positive  relation  between  damage  and 
growth  remains  for  the  three  damage  treatments. 


DISCUSSION 

Differences  in  mortality  among  damage  lev  els  were  mar- 
ginally significant  (p  =  0.052),  but  probabl\-  not  biolog- 
ically meaningful  because  there  is  no  relationship  be- 
tween the  treatment  and  the  apparent  response  (figure 
2).  A  lack  of  relation  between  damage  and  mortality  is 
consistent  with  the  conclusions  of  Zipser  and  Vermeij 
(1980)  that  shell  damage  does  not  cause  mortality  in 
marine  snails.  More  recentK ,  though.  Geller  ( 1990)  found 
that  damaged  Nucella,  an  intertidal  snail,  have  higher 
mortality  than  undamaged  snails.  Like  Helisoma,  how- 
ever, damaged  Nucella  have  more  shell  growth,  and  no 
difference  in  fecundity  relative  to  undamaged  snails 
(Geller,  1990).  In  Helisoma,  the  only  response  that  clear- 
ly differed  significantly  among  treatments  was  growth 
(figure  3),  which  increased  with  increasing  damage.  H. 
trivolvis  damaged  most  severely  regrew  their  shells  the 
most  (figure  3,  p  <  0.001),  but  suffered  no  decline  in 
fecundity  (figure  1)  or  any  increase  in  mortality  (figure 
2).  Results  were  therefore  inconsistent  with  both  initial 
hypotheses,  and  apparently  inconsistent  with  the  trade- 
off assumption  underKing  both  hypotheses. 

While  this  apparent  contradiction  of  the  trade-off  as- 
sumption is  intriguing,  the  limitations  of  our  experiment 
make  it  premature  to  reject  the  occurrence  of  physio- 
logical trade-offs  in  these  snails.  We  did  not  measure 
responses  in  energy  or  other  relevant  units,  nor  did  we 
measure  other  physiological  responses  that  may  be  in- 
volved in  trade-offs,  e.g.,  growth  of  living  biomass,  egg 
weight,  or  egg  viability.  Results  do,  however,  suggest 
that  shell  growth  is  "hardwired,"  i.e.,  it  cannot  be  turned 
off,  even  with  senescence  imminent  in  semelparous  snails. 

It  is  possible  that  a  damaged  snail  might  be  more 
vulnerable  to  subsequent  attacks  b\  predators.  We  did 
not  test  this  possibility ,  but  suspect  the  eftect  would  be 
minor.  In  lab  experiments  where  crayfish  damaged  shells 
(Olsen,  1989),  crayfish  appeared  to  curtail  an  attack  be- 
cause the  remaining  shell  was  simpK-  too  strong  to  break. 
In  addition,  the  earlier  experiments  probabK  enhanced 
the  frequency  of  shell  damage  over  natural  frequencies 
by  enhancing  encounter  rates  between  predator  and  prey. 
Thus,  it  seems  unlikely  that  non-lethal  shell  damage  by 
cra\fish  would  have  any  impact  on  snail  population 
growth. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  Mark  Olsen  for  helpful  suggestions  on  the 
design  of  this  experiment,  which  was  derived  from  a 
similar  preliminary  experiment  conducted  b\  Olsen. 
Thanks  also  go  to  Ronald  Hellenthal,  Martin  Berg,  Mi- 
chael Dini,  Kathleen  McTigue  and  students  of  the  UN- 
DERC"  program,  who  all  helped  in  the  research.  Geerat 
Vermeij.  Robert  Dillon,  Roy  Stein,  and  Ken  Brown  pro- 
vided helpful  reviews  of  the  manuscript.  Financial  sup- 
port for  this  project  was  provided  by  the  Hank  Family 
Endowment  for  I'NDERC  and  grants  to  David  M.  Lodge 
(NSFBSR-8500775  and  NSFBSR-8907407).  This  is  a  con- 


T.  Stahl  and  D.  Lodge,  1990 


Page  95 


tribution  from  the  ITniversity  of  Notre  Dame  Environ- 
mental Research  Center. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Boerger,  H.  1975.  .\  comparison  of  the  life  c>cles.  reproduc- 
tive ecologies,  and  size-weight  relationships  of  Helisoma 
anceps,  H.  aimpai^ulata.  and  H  trivolvis  (Gastropoda, 
Planorbidae).  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoolog\  53;1812-1S24. 

Brown,  K.  M.  and  B.  A.  Strouse.  1988.  Relative  vulnerability 
of  six  freshwater  gastropods  to  the  leech  Nephelopsis  ob- 
scura  (Verrill).  Freshwater  Biology  19:157-166, 

Crowl.  T.  A.  1989.  Direct  and  indirect  effects  of  crayfish 
(Orconectes  virilis)  predation  on  snail  {Physella  virgata 
virgata )  population  d\  namics  in  spring-fed  streams.  Ph.D. 
dissertation.  The  L  niversits  of  Oklahoma,  139-1-  pp. 

Garrity,  S.  D,  S.  C.  Levings,  and  HM  Caffey.  1986.  Spatial 
and  temporal  variation  in  shell  crushing  by  fishes  on  rocky 
shores  of  Pacific  Panama.  Journal  of  Experimental  Marine 
Biology  and  Ecology  103:131-142, 

Geller.  J  B  1990.  Reproductive  responses  to  shell  damage 
by  the  gastropod  \ucclla  emarginata  (Deshayes).  Journal 
of  Experimental  Marine  Biolog)  and  Ecology  136:77-87. 

Kirkwood,  T.  B.  L.  1981.  Repair  and  its  evolution:  survival 
versus  reproduction.  In:  Townsend,  C  R.  and  P  Calow 
(eds. ).  Ph\'siological  ecology:  an  evolutionary  approach  to 
resource  use.  Blackwell  Scientific  Publications,  Boston,  p. 
165-189. 

Lodge.  D.  M.,  K.  M.  Brown,  S.  P.  Klosiewski,  R.  .A.  Stein,  A. 
P.  Covich,  and  C.  Bronmark  1987.  Distribution  of  fresh- 
water snails:  spatial  scale  and  the  relative  importance  of 
physicochemical  and  biotic  factors.  .'American  Malaco- 
logical  Bulletin  5:73-84. 

Lodge,  D  M  and  J  G  Lorman  1987  Reductions  in  sub- 
mersed macrophyte  biomass  and  species  richness  by  the 
crayfish  Orconectes  rusticus.  Canadian  Journal  of  Fish- 
eries and  Aquatic  Science  44:581-597. 

Norton,  S.  F.  1988.  Role  of  the  gastropod  shell  and  operculum 
in  inhibiting  predation  by  fishes.  Science  241:92-94 


Olsen,  T.  M.  1989.  Impact  of  the  introduced  crayfish,  Or- 
conectes rusticus,  in  Northern  Wisconsin  lakes:  field  and 
laboratory  studies.  M.S.  thesis,  Universitv  of  .Notre  Dame. 

Osenberg,  C  W  and  G.  G  Mittelbach.  1989.  Effects  of  body 
size  on  the  predator)  -prey  interaction  between  pumpkin- 
seed  sunfish  and  gastropods.  Ecological  Monographs  .59: 
405-432. 

Raffaelli,  D.  G.  1978.  The  relationship  between  shell  injuries, 
shell  thickness  and  habitat  characteristics  of  the  intertidal 
snail  Littorina  rudis  Maton.  Journal  of  Molluscan  Studies 
44:166-170 

Stein.  R.  A.,  C.  G.  Goodman,  and  E.  A.  Marschall.  1984.  Using 
time  and  energetic  measures  of  cost  in  estimating  prey 
value  of  fish  predators.  Ecolog\  65:702-715. 

Tilman,  D.  1989.  Discussion:  population  dynamics  and  species 
interactions.  In:  Roughgarden,  J.,  R.  H.  May,  and  S  A. 
Levin  (eds.).  Perspectives  in  Ecological  Theor\  Princeton 
University  Press.  Princeton,  p.  89-100. 

Vale,  F.  K.  and  M.  A.  Rex.  1989  Repaired  shell  damage  in 
a  complex  of  Rissoid  gastropods  from  the  Upper  Conti- 
nental Slope  south  of  New  England.  The  Nautilus  103: 
105-108. 

Vermeij,  G.  J.  1979.  Shell  architecture  and  causes  of  death 
in  micronesian  reef  snails.  Evolution  33:  686-696. 

Vermeij,  G.  J.  1982  Gastropod  shell  form,  breakage,  and 
repair  in  relation  to  predation  b\  the  crab  Calappa.  Maia- 
cologia  23:1-12. 

Vermeij,  G.  J  and  \  P.  Covich.  1978.  Coevolution  of  fresh- 
water gastropods  and  their  predators.  American  Naturalist 
112:833-843. 

Vermeij,  G.  J.,  E.  Zipser,  and  E.  C  Dudley  1980  Predation 
in  time  and  space:  peeling  and  drilling  in  terebrid  gastro- 
pods. Paleobiolog)'  6:352-364. 

Weber,  L.  M.  and  D.  M.  Lodge.  1990.  Periph\tic  food  and 
predatory  crayfish:  relative  roles  in  determining  snail  dis- 
tribution Oecologia  82:33-39. 

Zipser,  E  and  G.  J.  Vermeij.  1980.  Survival  after  nonlethal 
shell  damage  in  the  gastropod  Conus  sponsalis.  Micro- 
nesica  16:229-234. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(3):96-104,  1990 


Page  96 


New  Gastropods  from  the  Bermont  Formation 
(Middle  Pleistocene)  of  the  Everglades  Basin 


Edward  J.  Peluch 

Dtpartnicnt  of  Geology- 
Florida  Atlantic  University 
Boca  Ralon,  FL  33431,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Eight  new  gastropods  are  described  from  tfie  poorly-known 
basal  beds  ("Holey  Land  Unit")  of  the  middle  Pleistocene  Ber- 
mont Formation  of  the  Everglades  Basin.  The  new  species 
include  Cypraea  (Macrocypraea)  spengleri  n.sp.  and  Cypraea 
(Pseudozonaria)  portelli  n.sp.  (Cypraeidae),  Melongena  (Mic- 
cosukca)  cynthiae  n.sp,  and  Melongena  {Miccosukea)  holey- 
landica  n.sp,  (Melongeiiidae),  Scaphella  seminole  n.sp.  (Volu- 
tidae),  and  Conus  capelettii  n.sp.,  Contis  griffini  n.sp.,  and 
Conufi  lemoni  nsp,  (Conidae).  Also  described  is  a  new  subgenus 
of  Melongena  Schumacher,  1817,  Miecosukea  n.subgen.,  which 
represents  an  endemic  Pleistocene  species  radiation  from  within 
the  Everglades  region. 

Key  words:    Gastropods;  Pleistocene;  Everglades;  Florida. 


INTRODUCTION 

Of  the  major  surficial  stratigraphic  units  of  the  Ever- 
glades Basin  of  southern  Florida,  the  middle  Pleistocene 
Bermont  Formation  is  the  least  known  and  the  most 
poorly  studied.  Indeed,  the  formation  did  not  even  re- 
ceive an  official  designation  until  1974,  when  DuBar 
informally  named  and  described  this  important  set  of 
units.  Previously  (i.e.,  McGinty,  1970;  Hoerle,  1970),  the 
formation  was  simply  referred  to  as  "Unit  A"  or  the 
"Glades  Unit,"  or,  prior  to  that  time,  as  the  "un-named 
post-Caloosahatchee  formation"  (i.e.,  E.  Voices,  1968). 
Although  the  formation  name  still  has  not  been  accepted 
by  regional  offices  of  the  United  States  Geological  Survey 
(fide  Wesley  L.  Miller,  Water  Resources  Division,  USGS, 
Miami),  several  workers  in  the  Pleistocene  paleontology 
of  southern  Florida  have  adopted  its  usage  and  recognize 
its  importance  as  the  "missing  link"  in  the  stratigraphic 
record  of  the  Everglades  region  (i.e.,  E.  Yokes,  1976, 
1984;  Petuch,  1988).  Since  the  depositional  center  of  the 
formation  is  within  the  Everglades  Basin  where  there 
are  few  sampling  sites,  only  sporadic  collections  of  Ber- 
mont material  have  been  made  and  the  molluscan  fauna, 
particularly  the  gastropod  component,  is  known  from 
only  a  handful  of  publications. 

In  response  to  increased  building  and  construction  in 
southern  Florida,  several  large  new  land  fill  (juarries  have 


been  excavated  within  the  Everglades  region  over  the 
last  few  years.  Two  of  these  in  particular,  the  Capeletti 
Brothers  pit  #11  in  northern  Dade  County  and  the  Grif- 
fin Brothers  pit  on  the  Brow  ard-Palm  Beach  County  line, 
have  cut  into  extremely  fossiliferous  beds  of  the  Bermont 
Formation  and  have  uncovered  many  new  and  interest- 
ing gastropods.  Besides  new  species,  both  quarries  have 
yielded  large  numbers  of  classic  Bermont  index  fossils 
(as  listed  by  McGinty,  1970;  DuBar,  1974;  and  Petuch, 
1988,  1989)  such  as  Melongena  (Rexmela)  hispinosa 
(Philippi,  1844),  Fasciolaria  okecchobeensis  Tucker  and 
Wilson,  1932,  Latirus  maxwelli  Pilsbry,  1942,  Vasum 
floridanum  McGinty,  1940,  Fusinus  watermani  (M. 
Smith,  1940),  and  Stromhua  mayacensis  Tucker  and  Wil- 
son, 1933,  demonstrating  the  contemporaneous  nature 
of  their  beds.  Several  other  newly-described  index  fossils, 
including  Lindoliva  griffini  Petuch,  1988,  Lindoliva 
spengleri  Petuch,  1988,  and  Maica  petiti  Petuch,  1989 
were  also  collected  in  both  quarries,  indicating  that  the 
dredged  fossiliferous  sediments  came  from  the  same 
stratigraphic  horizon. 

At  both  quarries,  the  Bermont  Formation  is  approxi- 
mately 10  meters  thick  and  is  stratigraphically  more 
complex  than  had  previously  been  reported  (DuBar, 
1974).  Of  particular  interest  are  the  basal  beds  of  the 
formation,  w  hich  contain  a  large  number  of  undescribed 
gastropod  species.  Although  containing  the  same  species 
at  both  localities,  the  basal  beds  in  the  Capeletti  Brothers 
pit  are  marly  and  unconsolidated  whereas  the  strati- 
graphic equivalents  in  the  Griffin  Brothers  pit  are  in- 
durated into  a  thick  la\  er  of  dense  limestone.  This  richly 
fossiliferous  indurated  bed  (figure  22),  which  averages  2 
meters  in  thickness  and  is  found  at  a  depth  of  approxi- 
mately 15  meters  below  surface,  has  also  been  uncovered 
at  construction  sites  in  the  Loxahatchee  area  of  West 
Palm  Beach  and  south  of  South  Ba\,  along  the  North 
New  River  Canal  in  central  Palm  Beach  County.  The 
most  numerous  and  largest  blocks  of  this  Bermont  lime- 
stone, however,  have  been  dredged  from  the  Griffin 
Brothers  pit.  Since  the  Griffin  pit  and  its  exposures  of 
Bermont  material  are  adjacent  to  the  Holey  Land  Wild- 
life Refuge  (named  for  the  numerous  shallow  craters 
formed  by  World  War  II  bombing  practice,  ^c/f"  Howard 


E.  J.  Petuch,  1990 


Page  97 


A.  Griffin,  Jr.),  the  basal  indurated  bed  has  been  infor- 
malK  referred  to  by  local  paleontologists  as  the  "Holey 
Land  Unit,  "  A  cursory  survey  of  the  gastropods  of  the 
Holey  Land  LInit  has  shown  that  a  large  percentage  of 
the  species  appear  to  be  undescribed  and  that  several 
belong  to  previousK  unknown  subgenera  and  species 
complexes. 

In  this  paper,  eight  new  gastropod  species  and  a  new 
gastropod  subgenus  are  described  from  the  basal  beds 
("Holey  Land  Unit")  of  the  Bermont  Formation.  In- 
cluded are  Cypraea  (Macrocypraea)  spengleri  n.sp.  and 
Cypraea  (Pseudozonaria)  portclli  n.sp.  (Cypraeidae), 
Melongena  (Miccosiihca)  cynthiae  n.sp.  and  Melongena 
{Miccosiikea)  holeylandica  n.sp.  (Melongenidae),  Sca- 
phella  Seminole  n.sp.  (N'olutidae),  and  Coniia  capelettii 
n.sp..  Conns  griffini  n.sp.,  and  Conns  lemoni  n.sp.  (Co- 
nidae),  and  the  new  subgenus  of  Melongena,  Miccosukea 
n.subgen.  Institutional  abbreviations,  for  the  deposition 
of  t\'pe  material,  include:  USNM  (Department  of  Paleo- 
biology, National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smith- 
sonian Institution),  UF  (Florida  Museum  of  Natural  His- 
tory, Universit)  of  Florida,  Gainesville,  Florida),  CM 
(Department  of  Paleontology,  Carnegie  Museum  of  Nat- 
ural History,  Pittsburgh,  Pennsylvania),  and  FALI  (De- 
partment of  Geology,  Florida  Atlantic  University,  Boca 
Raton,  Florida). 

SYSTEMATICS 

Gastropoda 

Prosobranchia 

Cypraeacea 

Cypraeidae 

Cypraea  Linnaeus,  1758 

Macrocypraea  Schilder,  1930 

Cypraea  (Macrocypraea)  spengleri  new  species 
(figures  5,  6) 

Material  examined:  HOLOTYPE — Length  107  mm, 
dredged  from  20  m  depth  in  Capeletti  Brothers  pit  #11, 
7  km  west  of  Florida  Turnpike,  due  west  of  Hialeah. 
northeastern  Dade  County,  Florida,  CM  35728;  PARA- 
TYPES — Length  (fragmentary)  105  mm,  dredged  from 
15  ni  depth  in  Griffin  Brothers  pit,  10  km  west  of  US 
Highway  27,  along  Palm  Beach-Broward  County  line, 
Florida,  FAU  320;  length  120  mm,  internal  mold,  same 
locality  as  previous  paratype,  FAU  321;  length  158  mm, 
same  locality  as  previous  two  paratypes,  Spengler  col- 
lection. Lantana,  Florida;  length  83  mm,  same  locality 
as  holotype,  Petuch  collection. 

Description:  Shell  typical  of  subgenus,  large,  inflated, 
subcylindrical;  aperture  narrow,  widening  toward  an- 
terior end,  arcuate;  columella  (holotype)  with  33  narrow 
teeth  that  extend  into  aperture;  lip  with  44  narrow  teeth; 
fossula  poorK  developed,  with  9  narrow  teeth;  base  of 
shell  rounded;  auricles  (extrapolated  from  damaged  type 
material)  well  developed,  projecting;  color  pattern  (faint- 
ly preserved  on  holotype)  composed  of  numerous  small, 
widely-scattered  round  spots. 


Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  John  Spengler  of  Lantana, 
F"lorida,  who  has  helped  me  collect  at  several  important 
fossil  sites  in  the  Everglades. 

Discussion:  Cypraea  spengleri  represents  the  first  new- 
species  of  the  subgenus  Macrocypraea  to  be  described 
from  the  fossil  record  of  the  continental  United  States, 
and  is  the  largest  cowrie  known  from  the  Neogene  of 
Florida.  The  cypraeid  fragments  from  the  "Glades  Unit" 
of  the  Belle  Glade  pit,  listed  by  Hoerle  (1970:63)  as 
"Cypraea  ?cenms  Linne,"  are  probably  referable  to  C. 
spengleri.  The  "Cypraea  cervus"  from  Belle  Glade  and 
Ortona  Lock,  listed  by  McGinty  (1970:55),  is  also  prob- 
ably C.  spengleri.  Based  on  the  specimen  in  the  Spengler 
collection  (158  mm  paratype),  I  also  previously  referred 
the  new  species  to  C.  cervus  (Petuch,  1988:  plate  24,  fig. 
10).  As  molds,  C.  spengleri  is  relatively  common  in  the 
Holey  Land  limestone  at  the  Griffin  Brothers  pit.  but  the 
preservation  is  poor  and  most  specimens  are  fragmen- 
tary. Complete  specimens  such  as  the  holotype,  however, 
have  only  been  collected  in  the  unconsolidated  marly 
facies  of  the  Holey  Land  Unit  in  northern  Dade  County. 
Cypraea  spengleri  is  most  similar  to  C.  (Macrocy- 
praea] cervus  Linnaeus,  1771  from  the  Carolinian  Prov- 
ince and,  based  on  its  similar  shape  and  size,  is  probably 
the  direct  ancestor  of  that  well  known  Recent  species. 
The  main  difference  between  the  two  cowries,  however, 
is  seen  in  the  form  of  the  apertural  teeth,  particularly 
those  of  the  columella;  in  C.  cervus,  the  columellar  teeth 
are  slender  and  elongated,  extending  well  onto  the  base 
of  the  shell  (figure  7),  while  in  C.  spengleri.  the  colu- 
mellar teeth  are  short  and  coarse  and  do  not  extend  onto 
the  base  but.  instead,  terminate  along  the  edge  of  the 
columella  (figure  6).  Likewise,  the  labial  teeth  of  C  cer- 
vus are  finer  and  more  elongated  than  those  of  C.  spen- 
gleri. and  also  extend  farther  onto  the  shell  base.  The 
number  of  apertural  teeth  also  differs  between  the  two 
species,  with  C.  cervus  having  more  teeth  (average  37 
columellar.  43  labial)  than  C.  spengleri  (average  33  col- 
umellar, 40  labial). 


Pseudozonaria  Schilder.  1927 

Cypraea  (Pseudozonaria)  portelli  n.sp. 
(figures  8.  9.  10) 

Material  examined:  HOLOTYPE — Length  25  mm, 
dredged  irom  15  m  depth  in  Griffin  Brothers  pit,  10  km 
west  of  US  Highwav  27,  at  Broward-Palm  Beach  Countv 
line,  Florida,  UF  28985;  PARATYPE— Length  25  mm, 
from  20  m  depth  in  Capeletti  Brothers  pit  #11,  7  km 
west  of  Florida  Turnpike,  northeastern  Dade  County-, 
Florida,  Petuch  collection. 

Description:  Shell  average  size  for  subgenus,  oval  in 
outline,  dorsoventralK  flattened;  beaks  yvell  developed, 
projecting;  margins  thickened,  sharply  angulate;  base 
slightly  rounded;  spire  region  shalloyvly  indented;  ap- 
erture narroyv,  slightly  arcuate;  teeth  blunt  and  coarse, 
numbering  15  along  columella  and  19  along  lip  (of  ho- 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


Figures  1-10.  New  Melongenids  and  Cypraeids  from  the  "Holey  Land  Unit"  of  the  Bermont  Formation  1.  Melongena  (Mic- 
cosukea) cijnthiae  n.sp  .  dorsal  view  of  paratype,  length  .5.5  mm;  2.  Melongena  (Miccosuke(2)cynthiae  n  sp.,  ventral  view  of  holotype, 
length  38  mm;  3,  4.  Melongena  (Miccosukea)  holeylaiulica  n.sp.,  dorsal  and  ventral  views  of  holot\  pe,  length  .35  mm;  5.  6.  Cypraea 
{Macrocypraea)  spengleri  n.sp.,  dorsal  and  ventral  views  of  holotype,  length  107  mm;  7.  Cypraea  (Macrocypraea)  cervus  Linnaeus, 
1771,  ventral  view  of  85  mm  specimen,  for  comparison  with  C.  (Macrocypraea)  spengleri.  8,  •).  Cypraea  (Pseiidozonaria)  portelli 
n.sp.,  dorsal  and  ventral  views  of  holotype,  length  25  mm;  10.  Cypraea  {Pseiidozonaria)  porlelli  n  sp.,  lateral  view  (left)  of  holotype. 


E.  J.  Petuch,  1990 


Page  99 


lotype);  color  pattern  (faintly  preserved  on  holotype) 
composed  of  numerous,  denseK  -packed  specklings,  often 
fusing  together  to  form  longitudinal  stripes,  on  the  dor- 
sum and  numerous  evenly-spaced  small  spots  on  margins; 
anterior  and  posterior  tips  each  with  2  large  patches. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  Roger  Portell,  Florida  Mu- 
seum of  Natural  History,  who  collected  the  holotype. 

Discussion:  Cypraea  portelli  represents  the  first  species 
of  its  subgenus  to  be  found  in  the  fossil  record  of  the 
United  States.  Until  now,  Pseudozonaria  was  unknown 
in  the  Caloosahatchian  Province  (Miocene  to  Pleistocene 
S.E.  United  States  and  the  Floridian  Peninsula),  and  was 
thought  to  have  been  confined  to  the  Gatunian  Province 
(Miocene  to  Pleistocene  Caribbean,  northern  South 
America,  and  western  Central  America)  (Petuch,  1982; 
Vermeij  &  Petuch,  1986).  In  the  Recent,  the  subgenus  is 
represented  by  three  species  from  the  Panamic  Province 
of  the  tropical  western  Americas;  C.  [Pseudozonaria) 
arobicula  (Lamarck,  1811),  C.  (Pseudozonaria)  nigro- 
punctata  Gray,  1828,  and  C.  (Pseudozonaria)  robertsi 
(Hidalgo,  1906).  Of  the  three  living  species,  C.  (Pseu- 
dozonaria) portelli  is  most  similar  to  C.  robertsi,  being 
the  same  size  and  having  the  same  type  of  apertural 
teeth,  shape  and  form  of  the  aperture,  and  color  pattern. 
The  new  species  differs  from  C.  robertsi,  however,  in 
having  a  broader,  more  rounded  outline  and  in  having 
angled,  thickened  margins. 

In  the  fossil  record  of  the  Gatunian  Province  of  the 
Caribbean  basin,  C.  portelli  is  most  similar  to  C.  ray- 
mondrobertsi  bowdenensis  (Pilsbry,  1922)  from  the  Plio- 
cene of  Jamaica  and  the  Dominican  Republic.  Both  spe- 
cies share  the  same  broad,  oval  shell  outline  and  the  same 
flattened  appearance.  The  apertural  teeth  of  C.  raij- 
mondrobertsi  bowdenensis,  however,  are  proportionally 
much  larger  and  better  developed  than  those  of  C.  por- 
telli, and  extend  much  farther  across  the  base  of  the 
shell.  Cypraea  portelli  was  probably  the  last  Pseudozo- 
naria to  live  in  the  Atlantic. 


Buccinacea 

Melongenidae 

Melongeninae 

Melongena  Schumacher,  1817 

Miccosukea  new  subgenus 

Diagnosis:  Shells  average-sized  for  genus,  but  more 
elongated  and  fusiform,  generally  resembling  Fasciola- 
ria  species  in  outline;  shoulders,  especialK'  those  of  body 
whorls,  rounded,  without  prominent  spines  or  Dutings; 
shoulders  of  whorls  ornamented  with  low,  rounded  knobs 
or  evenly-spaced  low,  rounded  axial  ribs;  spires  and  body 
whorls  both  heavily  sculptured  with  numerous  strong 
spiral  cords;  spiral  cords  finer  and  more  numerous  on 
siphonal  canals;  siphonal  canals  very  well-developed, 
elongated;  siphonal  canals  of  some  species  well-differ- 
entiated from  body  whorl,  narrow,  giving  shells  appear- 
ance of  small  Pugilina  or  Busycon  species;  aperture  wide, 
flaring,  oval  in  shape;  spire  height  and  development  vari- 


able within  subgenus,  with  some  species  having  elevated, 
scalariform  spires  and  others  having  low,  slightly-stepped 
spires;  sutures  slightly  impressed,  smooth,  without  fine 
fimbriations  or  crenulations. 

Type  species:  Melongena  (Miccosukea)  cynthiae  new 
species,  described  here.  Lower  beds  ("Holey  Land  Unit") 
of  Bermont  Formation,  Aftonian  Stage,  Pleistocene,  Palm 
Beach  County,  Florida  (figures  1,  2). 

Other  species  in  Miccosukea:  Melongena  (Miccosukea ) 
holeylandica  new  species,  described  here.  Lower  beds 
("Holey  Land  Unit")  of  Bermont  Formation,  Aftonian 
Stage,  Pleistocene,  Palm  Beach  County  (figures  3,  4); 
Melongena  (Miccosukea)  sp.,  fragmentary,  Bermont 
Formation,  Aftonian  (Yarmouth?)  Stage,  Pleistocene, 
Dade  County,  Florida. 

Etymology:  The  new  subgenus  honors  the  Miccosukea 
Seminole  Tribe  of  the  Everglades. 

Discussion:  The  new  subgenus  represents  a  separate 
evolutionary  line  off  the  Melongena  Schumacher,  1817 
(sensu  stricto)  stock,  and  appears  to  have  been  endemic 
to  southern  Florida.  This  local  radiation  differs  from 
classic  Melongena  species  in  containing  smaller,  more 
fusiform  shells  with  better-developed  and  more  elon- 
gated siphonal  canals,  and  in  lacking  sutural  fimbriations 
and  large  shoulder  spines.  Miccosukea  also  differs  from 
the  subgenus  Rexmela  Olsson  and  Harbison,  1953  in 
being  more  fusiform  in  shape,  in  having  much  better 
developed  siphonal  canals,  in  lacking  large  shoulder 
spines,  and  in  lacking  the  "collar"  of  fimbriations  bor- 
dering the  suture. 

At  several  Bermont  localities,  Melongena  (Miccosu- 
kea) species  and  Melongena  (Rexnuda)  species,  such  as 
M.  (Rexmela)  bispinosa  (Philippi,  1844),  occur  together 
and  show  that  the  two  subgenera  were  sympatric. 

Melongena  (Miccosukea)  cynthiae  new  species 

(figures  1,  2) 

Material  examined:  HOLOTYPE — Length  38  mm, 
dredged  from  15  m  depth  in  Griffin  Brothers  pit,  10  km 
west  of  US  Highway  27,  at  Broward-Palm  Beach  Countv 
line,  Florida,  USNM  448813;  PARATYPES— Length  55 
mm  (incomplete),  same  locality  as  holotype,  FAU  322 
(figure  1);  lengths  41  and  52  mm,  same  locality  as  ho- 
lotype, FAU  323;  length  64  mm,  same  locality  as  holo- 
type, Petuch  collection. 

Description:  General  shell  shape  and  form  as  for  sub- 
genus; spire  protracted,  scalariform;  spire  v\  horls  convex; 
suture  impressed;  spire,  body  whorl,  and  siphonal  canal 
heavily  sculptured  with  numerous  large,  evenly-spaced 
spiral  cords;  smaller  secondary  cords  present  between 
large  primary  cords. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mrs.  C\iithia  Mischler,  De- 
partment of  Geology,  Florida  Atlantic  L'niversitv . 

Discussion:  Melongena  cynthiae,  type  of  the  new  sub- 
genus, more  closely  resembles  a  small  Pugilina  Schu- 


Page  100 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


machcr,  1817  species  than  it  does  other  western  Atlantic 
melongenids.  UnUke  Pugilina  species,  M.  cynthiae  has 
a  distinctly  rounded  shoulder  on  the  body  whorl,  rounded 
and  convex  spire  whorls,  and  an  impressed  suture.  In 
having  a  protracted,  scalariform  spire,  the  new  species 
somewhat  resembles  high-spired  forms  of  Melongena 
(Rexmela)  corona  (Gmelin,  1791),  such  asaltispira  Pils- 
bry  and  Vanatta,  1934.  Melongena  cynthiae  differs  from 
these  high-spired  forms,  however,  in  having  a  much  more 
elongated  body  whorl  and  in  having  a  much  better  de- 
veloped, and  longer,  siphonal  canal.  Being  in  Miccusii- 
kea,  M.  cynthiae  also  lacks  the  open  shoulder  spines  and 
fimbriated  sutures  of  Rcxnicla  species. 

The  new  species  is  also  similar  to  the  stratigraphically 
higher  Melongena  (Miccosukea)  holeylandica  n.sp.  (fig- 
ures 3,  4),  but  differs  in  having  a  much  higher,  scalari- 
form spire,  in  having  a  longer  siphonal  canal,  and  in 
being  more  heavily  sculptured  with  strong  spiral  cords. 
A  large,  undescribed  Miccosukea  species  has  also  been 
collected,  although  only  as  fragments,  in  the  uppermost 
beds  of  the  Bermont  Formation  in  the  Capeletti  Brothers 
pit.  This  un-named  species  also  has  a  high,  scalariform 
spire,  but  has  a  smoother,  less  sculptured  shell.  The  "Mel- 
ongenid-new  genus,  new  species"  that  I  previously  il- 
lustrated (Petuch,  1988:  plate  24,  figs.  1,  2)  is  M.  cynthiae. 

Melongena  (Miccosukea)  holeylandica  new  species 
(figures  3,  4) 

Material  examined:  HOLOTYPE — Length  35  mm, 
dredged  from  12  m  depth  in  Griffin  Brothers  pit,  10  km 
west  of  US  Highway  27,  at  Broward-Palm  Beach  County 
line,  Florida,  USNM  448814;  PARATYPES— Lengths  48, 
51,  and  55  mm,  same  locality  as  holotype,  FAU  324; 
length  52  mm,  same  locality  as  holotype,  Petuch  collec- 
tion. 

Description:  General  shell  shape  and  form  as  for  sub- 
genus; spire  low,  rounded,  slightly  dome-shaped;  sub- 
sutural  area  raised  to  form  large,  rounded  spiral  cord; 
subsutural  cord  producing  minutely  canaliculate  suture; 
spire,  body  whorl,  and  siphonal  canal  sculptured  with 
low,  faint  spiral  cords;  shoulder  of  body  whorl  orna- 
mented with  scattered  small,  low  knobs;  siphonal  canal 
broad. 

Etymology:  Named  for  the  area  adjacent  to  the  type 
locality,  the  Holey  Land  Wildlife  Refuge. 

Discussion:  The  similarities  and  differences  between 
Melongena  holeylandica  and  the  only  other  named  Mic- 
cosukea species,  M  cynthiae,  are  discn.s.sed  under  the 
preceding  description.  The  "Melongenid-nev\  genus,  new 
species"  that  I  previously  illustrated  (Petuch,  1988:  plate 
24,  figs.  5,  6)  is  M  holeylandica. 

Volutacea 

Volutidac 

Scaphellin;  • 

Scaphella  .'■      u  ;rvn,  1832 


Scaphella  seminole  new  species 
(figures  18,  19,  20,  21) 

Material  examined:  HOLOTYPE — Length  52  mm, 
dredged  from  20  m  depth  in  Capeletti  Brothers  pit  #11, 
7  km  west  of  Florida  Turnpike,  due  west  of  Hialeah, 
northeastern  Dade  County,  Florida,  CM  35729;  P.\R,\- 
TYPES — Length  53  mm,  same  locality  as  holotype,  CM 
35730  (figures  20,  21);  lengths  54,  55,  and  56  mm,  same 
locality  as  holotype,  FAU  325;  lengths  55,  56  mm,  same 
locality  as  holotype,  Petuch  collection. 

Description:  Shell  small  for  genus,  fusiform,  with 
rounded,  sloping  shoulder;  spire  proportionally  low,  with 
sloping  whorls;  top  of  shoulder  marked  with  faintly  in- 
cised, shallow  furrow;  area  between  suture  and  shoulder 
furrow  producing  wide,  faintK  raised  subsutural  band; 
protoconch  proportionalK  large,  rounded,  domelike,  with 
rounded  calcarella;  first  2  postnuclear  whorls  heavily 
sculptured  w  ith  numerous,  evenly-spaced,  large  axial  ribs; 
axial  ribs  overlaid  with  numerous  fine  spiral  threads, 
producing  slightly  cancellate  appearance;  columella  with 
4  large  plications;  color  pattern,  when  preserved,  com- 
posed of  7-9  rows  of  large,  evenly-spaced  rectangular 
checkers. 

Etymology:  Named  for  the  Seminole  Indian  Tribe  of 
the  Everglades  region. 

Discussion:  Scaphella  seminole  is  the  smallest  of  the 
known  fossil  Scaphella  species,  with  the  average  length 
of  the  type  lot  (all  adult  specimens  with  thickened,  pos- 
teriorly-Daring lips)  being  only  around  54  mm.  The  new- 
species  is  similar  to  the  late  Pliocene-earK  Pleistocene 
Caloosahatchee  Formation  S.  floridana  (.Heilprin,  1886), 
but  differs  in  having  a  much  smaller,  stumpier  shell  with 
a  much  lower,  unprotracted  spire.  The  axial  ribbing  on 
the  postnuclear  whorls  of  S.  floridana  is  also  coarser  and 
better  developed  than  that  of  S.  seminole  and  extends 
onto  the  third  whorl. 

Conacea 
Conidae 
Conus  Linnaeus,  1758 

Conus  capelettii  new  species 
(figures  11,  12,  13) 

Material  examined:  HOLOTYPE — Length  38  mm, 
dredged  from  20  m  depth  in  Capeletti  Brothers  pit  #11, 
7  km  west  of  F'lorida  Turnpike,  due  west  of  Hialeah, 
northeastern  Dade  C:ount\,  Florida,  CM  35731;  PARA- 
TYPES— Length  33  mm,  same  localit\  as  holot\  pe,  CM 
35732  (figure  13);  lengths  36,  39,  41,  and  42  mm,  same 
localits  as  holotype,  Petuch  collection. 

Description:  Shell  slender,  elongateK  subpyriform,  bi- 
coiiic;  shoulder  sharply  angled,  carinated;  spire  very  pro- 
tracted, scalariform;  body  whorl  and  spire  smooth,  with 
silky  texture;  anterior  end  encircled  with  8-10  deep, 
evenly-spaced  grooves;  aperture  narrow,  widening  slightly 


E.  J^  Petuch,  1990 


Page  101 


Figures  11-21.  New  Conids  and  Volutids  from  the  "Holey  Land  Unit"  of  the  Bermont  Formation.  11,  12.  Conus  capelettii 
n.sp.,  dorsal  and  ventral  views  of  holotype,  length  38  mm;  13.  Conus  capelettii  n.sp,  dorsal  view  of  paratspe,  length  33  mm:  14, 
15.  Conus  griffini  n.sp.,  dorsal  and  ventral  views  of  holotype,  length  15  mm;  16.  17.  Conus  lemoni  n.sp.,  dorsal  and  ventral  views 
of  holotype,  length  56  mm;  18,  19.  Scaphella  seminole  n.sp.,  dorsal  and  ventral  views  of  holotype,  length  52  mm;  20,  21.  Scaphella 
Seminole  n.sp.,  dorsal  and  ventral  views  of  parat\pe,  length  53  mm. 


Page  102 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


Figure  22.  Detail  of  a  fossiliferoiis  liincstone  block  from  the  lia.sal  beds  ("Holey  Land  Unit")  of  the  Bermont  Formation.  This 
block  was  dredged  from  15  rn  depth  in  the  (iriffin  Brothers  pit  on  the  Palm  Beach-Broward  County  line  in  the  central  Everglades 
Basin.  The  lucinids  on  the  left  and  lower  left  are  approximately  60  mm  in  diameter 


toward  anterior  end;  color  pattern,  ulieii  preserved,  com- 
posed of  wide  longitudinal  flaiiumiles  and  zig-zags. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  Ronald  Capeletti,  of  Ca- 
peletti  Brothers,  Inc.,  Hialeah,  Florida,  in  thanks  for  al- 
lowing me  to  collect  large  suites  of  Bermont  material  on 
his  property. 


Discussion:  Conns  capelettii  has  the  highest,  most  sca- 
lariform  spire  of  any  cone  shell  known  from  the  Plio- 
Pleistocene  fo.ssil  record  of  Florida.  Based  on  shell  shape, 
size,  and  spire  form,  the  new  species  appears  to  be  more 
closely  relatetl  to  Conns  scalaris  Valenciennes,  1832  from 
the  Recent  western  coast  of  Mexico  than  to  other  western 
Atlantic  cone  shells.  C.'of!(/.s  capelettii  differs  from  C. 


E.  J.  Petuch,  1990 


Page  103 


scalaris,  however,  in  having  a  proportionally  shorter  body 
whorl  with  a  distinctly  more  pyriform  shape.  The  new 
Berniont  species  is  also  similar  in  shape  to  some  slender 
morphs  of  the  Recent  Carolinian  Province  C.  floridanus 
Gabb,  1868,  but  differs  primarily  in  having  a  sharper, 
more  carinated  shoulder  and  in  having  a  much  higher, 
scalariform  spire. 

Conus  griffini  new  species 
(figures  14,  15) 

Material  examined:  HOLOTYPE — Length  15  mm, 
dredged  from  15  m  depth  in  North  New  River  Canal, 
along  US  Highway  27,  30  km  south  of  South  Bav.  Palm 
Beach  C:ount> ,  Florida,  CM  35733;  PARATYPE— Length 
18  mm,  dredged  from  15  m  depth  in  Griffin  Brothers 
pit,  10  km  west  of  US  Highway  27,  at  Broward-Palm 
Beach  County  line,  Florida,  Petuch  collection. 

Description:  Shell  small  for  genus,  slender,  straight- 
sided;  shoulder  sharply  angled,  carinated;  spire  low  and 
flattened;  body  whorl  smooth  and  shiny;  anterior  tip  en- 
circled with  8-10  low,  rounded  cords;  aperture  narrow; 
protoconch  mammillate,  projecting  above  spire  line;  col- 
or pattern,  when  preser\ed,  composed  of  single  row  of 
small  spots  around  midbod\ 

Etymology:  Named  for  Mr.  Howard  A.  ("Andy")  Grif- 
fin, Jr.,  Davy,  Florida,  in  thanks  for  allowing  me  to  collect 
on  his  propert)  over  the  last  eight  years. 

Discussion:  Conus  griffini  is  the  first  member  of  the  C. 
magellanicus  Hwass,  1792  species  complex  to  be  found 
in  the  fossil  record  of  continental  North  America.  In  the 
Recent,  this  complex  of  small  cones  is  confined  to  shallow 
water,  coral  reef  areas  of  the  West  Indies,  Bahamas,  and 
Caribbean  Basin.  The  new  Bermont  species  is  most  sim- 
ilar to  the  Recent  C.  kalafuti  DaMotta,  1987  from  Roatan 
Is.,  Honduras,  and  both  cones  have  the  same  small  size, 
flat  spire,  projecting  nipple-like  protoconch,  and  color 
pattern  composed  of  a  checkered  midbody  band.  Conus 
griffini  differs  from  C.  kalafuti,  however,  in  having  a 
more  slender,  straight-sided  shell  and  in  having  stronger 
spiral  cords  around  the  anterior  tip.  Otherwise,  the  two 
species  are  very  similar,  and  C.  griffini  is  most  probably 
the  ancestor  of  the  Honduran  C.  kalafuti. 

Previously  (Petuch,  1988:  plate  23,  fig.  2),  1  had  illus- 
trated and  referred  to  this  new  Bermont  cone  as  "Conus 
cf.  eversoni  Petuch,  1987."  That  species,  which  is  also 
related  to  C.  kalafuti  and  is  also  from  Roatan  Is.,  Hon- 
duras, has  a  larger  and  more  elongated  shell  than  C. 
griffini.  The  protoconch  of  C.  griffini  is  also  proportion- 
ally larger  than  that  of  C.  eversoni  and  is  more  promi- 
nentlv  mammillate. 


Conus  lemoni  new  species 
(figures  16,  17) 

Material   examined:      HOLOTYPE— Length   56   mm, 
dredged  from  15  m  depth  in  Griffin  Brothers  pit,  10  km 


west  of  US  Highway  27,  at  Broward-Palm  Beach  County 
line,  Florida,  CM  35734;  PARATYPES— Length  49  mm, 
same  localit>-  as  holotype,  CM  357.35;  lengths  37,  45,  48^ 
and  68  mm,  same  locality  as  holotype,  FAU  326;  length 
65  mm,  dredged  from  20  m  depth  in  Capeletti  Brothers 
pit  #11,  7  km  west  of  Florida  Turnpike,  due  west  of 
Hialeah,  northeastern  Dade  County,  Florida,  Petuch  col- 
lection. 

Description:  Shell  broad,  heavy,  with  wide  shoulder; 
shoulder  angled,  with  rounded  edge;  spire  low,  flattened, 
with  early  whorls  projecting  above  later  whorls;  suture 
indented;  spire  w  liorls  distinct!)  canaliculate;  bodv  whorl 
heavily  sculptured  v\  ith  numerous,  closely-packed,  large 
spiral  cords;  aperture  narrow;  color  pattern,  when  pre- 
served, composed  of  numerous  rows  of  small  spots,  often 
arranged  in  bands,  and  scattered  large  axial  flammules 
that  often  coalesce  to  form  longitudinal  stripes;  spire 
marked  with  evenly-spaced  crescent-shaped  flammules. 

Etymology:  Named  for  Dr.  Roy  Lemon,  Department 
of  Geology,  Florida  Atlantic  University. 

Discussion:  Conus  lemoni  is  a  new  member  of  the  Co- 
nus spurius,  1791  species  complex  of  the  Pliocene-to- 
Recent  Caribbean  and  Floridian  regions.  Morphologi- 
cally, the  new  Bermont  species  combines  the  shell  char- 
acters of  tw  o  Recent  species,  C.  spurius  atlanticus  C:lench, 
1942  and  C.  lorenzianus  Dillwyn,  1817.  In  having  a 
broad  shell  shape,  rounded  shoulder  edge,  and  low  spire, 
C.  lemoni  resembles  the  Carolinian  C.  spurius  atlanti- 
cus. On  the  other  hand,  in  being  hea\  il\  sculptured  \\  ith 
closeK-packed  spiral  cords  and  in  having  a  flammulated 
color  pattern,  the  new  Bermont  cone  resembles  the  south- 
western Caribbean  C.  lorenzianus.  It  is  possible  that  C. 
lemoni  is  ancestral  to  both  closely-related  species. 

In  the  Florida  fossil  record,  C.  lemoni  is  similar  to 
several  undescribed  subspecies  of  C.  spurius  from  the 
upper  beds  of  the  Bermont  Formation  and  the  overlying 
Fort  Thompson  Formation  (late  Pleistocene).  The  new 
Holey  Land  species  differs  from  the  younger  C.  spurius 
subspecies,  however,  in  having  distinctly  canaliculate  spire 
whorls  and  in  being  heavik'  sculptured  with  spiral  cords. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  thank  Mr.  John  Spengler,  Lantana,  Florida,  for  assisting 
me  in  the  collection  of  Bermont  fossils,  and  Mr.  Howard 
("And\")  Griffin,  Jr.,  and  Mr.  Ronald  Capeletti  for  al- 
lowing me  to  collect  on  their  propert) .  Special  thanks  to 
Mrs.  Cynthia  Mischler  for  patientK  t\ping  the  manu- 
script. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

DuBar,  J  R  1974  Suinmar\  ot  tlie  N'eogene  stratigraphy  of 
southern  Florida  In:  Oaks,  R.  Q.  and  J  R  DuBar  (eds.) 
Post-Miocene  stratigraph) ,  Central  and  Southern  .Atlantic 
Coastal  Plain.  Utah  State  University  Press,  p.  206-231. 

Hoerle,  S,  E     1970     Mollusca  of  the  "Cllades"  unit  of  .southern 


Page  104 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


Florida:  Part  II.  List  of  Molluscan  species  from  the  Belle 
Glade  Rock  Pit,  Palm  Beach  C:oiint\ ,  Florida.  Tiilane  Stud- 
ies in  Geology  and  Paleontology  8(2):56-68. 

McGinty,  T.  L.  1970.  Mollusca  of  the  "Glades"  unit  of  south- 
ern Florida:  Part  I.  Introduction  and  observations.  Tulane 
Studies  in  Geology  and  Paleontology  8(2):53-56. 

Petuch,  E.  J.  1982.  Geographical  heterochrony:  contempo- 
raneous coexistence  of  Neogene  and  Recent  molluscan 
faunas  in  the  .Americas.  Palaeogeography ,  Palaeoclima- 
tology,  and  Palaeoecology  37:277-312. 

Petuch,  E.  J.  1988.  Neogene  history  of  tropical  .American 
mollusks.  The  Coastal  Education  and  Research  Founda- 
tion, Charlottesville,  Virginia.  217  p. 

Petuch,  E.  J.  1989.  New  species  of  Malea  (Gastropoda  Ton- 
nidae)  from  the  Pleistocene  of  southern  Florida.  The  Nau- 
tilus 103(3):92-95. 


\  ernieij,  G  J.  and  E.  J  Petuch  1986.  Differential  extinction 
in  tropical  .American  molluscs:  endemism,  architecture, 
and  the  Panama  Land  Bridge.  Malacologia  27(1):29-41. 

\okes,  E.  H.  1968.  Cenozoic  Muricidae  of  the  Western  .At- 
lantic Region.  Fart  IV — Hexaplex  and  Murexiella.  Tulane 
Studies  in  Geology  6(3):85-126. 

N'okes,  E.  H.  1976.  Cenozoic  Muricidae  of  the  Western  .At- 
lantic Region.  Part  VII — Calotropbon  and  Attiliosa.  Tu- 
lane Studies  in  Geology  and  Paleontology  12(3):101-132. 

Vokes,  E.  H.  1984.  A  new  species  of  Turbinella  (Mollusca: 
Gastropoda)  from  the  Pliocene  of  Mexico,  with  a  revision 
of  the  geologic  history  of  the  line.  Tulane  Studies  in  Ge- 
ology and  Paleontology  18(2):47-52. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(3):  105-107,  1990 


Page  105 


Micropilina  tangaroa,  a  New  Monoplacophoran 
(Mollusca)  from  Northern  New  Zealand 


B.  A.  Marshall 

National  Museum  of  New  Zealand 

Box  467 

Wellington,  New  Zealand 


ABSTRACT 

Micropilina  tangaroa  n.sp.,  based  on  a  single  shell  from  the 
Three  Kings  Rise,  northern  New  Zealand,  is  the  first  record  of 
the  class  Monoplacophora  from  the  western  Pacific. 

Key  words:    Monoplacophora;  New  Zealand;  Micropilina. 


the  multiple  muscle  attachment  scars  characteristic  of 
many  species  of  the  class  (figure  3)  (Lemche  &  Wing- 
strand,  1959;  Wingstrand,  1985),  The  class  name  is  gen- 
erally credited  to  Wenz  (in  Knight,  1952),  but,  as  indi- 
cated by  Waren  (1988),  it  was  first  introduced  bv  Odhner 
{in  Wenz,  1940). 


INTRODUCTION 

Since  the  discovery  of  Neopilina  galathea  in  1952 
(Lemche,  1957),  14  Recent  species  have  been  added  to 
the  class  Monoplacophora  (Lemche,  1957;  Clarke  &  Men- 
zies,  1959;  Menzies  &  Layton,  1963;  Tebble,  1967;  Men- 
zies,  1968;  Rokop,  1972;  McLean,  1979;  Moskalev  et  al, 
1983;  Bouchet  et  al,  1983;  Waren,  1988,  1989;  Waren 
&  Bouchet,  1990).  These  species  are  based  on  material 
from  off  Hawaii,  the  eastern  Pacific  margin,  the  western 
and  northern  Atlantic,  and  the  Gulf  of  Aden.  The  present 
record  extends  the  range  to  the  southwestern  Pacific  (fig- 
ure 1).  Recent  monoplacophorans  are  mainly  confined 
to  bathyal  and  abyssal  depths,  though  one  species  lives 
at  174-388  m  depth  off  southern  California  (McLean, 
1979).  Monoplacophoran  morphology  and  anatomy  have 
been  discussed  in  detail  by  Lemche  and  Wingstrand 
(1959)  and  Wingstrand  (1985),  while  Menzies  e<  al.  (1959) 
and  Tendal  (1985)  have  discussed  their  ecology  and  diet. 

Class  Monoplacophora  Odhner  in  Wenz,  1940 

Genus  Micropilina  Waren,  1989:2 

Type  species:  Micropilina  minuta  Waren,  1989,  by 
original  designation;  Recent,  northern  Atlantic. 

Remarks:  Suprageneric  classification  of  the  Monopla- 
cophora has  been  drastically  modified  by  Moskalev  et 
al.  (1983)  and  Starobogatov  and  Moskalev  (1987).  These 
authors  placed  the  11  Recent  species  then  known  into 
six  families  and  three  superfamilies.  Unfortunately  the 
anatomy  of  Micropilina  is  unknown,  so  it  cannot  be 
placed  in  this  hierarchial  framework.  Despite  the  lack 
of  supportive  anatomical  data,  Micropilina  species  are 
undoubtedly  monoplacophorans,  since  their  shells  exliibit 


Figure  1.  Map  of  New  Zealand  showing  t\pe  localit\'  (star) 
for  Micropilina  tangaroa  new  species.  200  and  1000  meter 
contours  indicated 


\ 


Lll 


/w- 


¥ 

/ 

(f-- 

V   ■ 

J? 

y. 

f . 

^ 


• 


'-P 


Figures  2-5.    Micwpilina  tangawa  new  species.  2.  Lett  lateral,  '.\.  ventral,  and  l.  dorsal  views  of  holotype  (length  =  L50  mm) 
5.  Detail  of  teleoconcfi  sculpture  (800  x ). 


B.  A.  Marshall,  1990 


Page  107 


Micropilina  tangaroa  new  species 
(figures  2-5) 

Description:  Shell  {holot\pe)  1.50  mm  long,  thin, 
strongK  arched  capuliform;  apertural  margin  regularly 
(uate,  concave  from  side  to  side;  rounded  apex  projecting 
slightly  beyond  anterior  apertural  margin,  opaque  white. 
Shell  wall  apparently  lamellar  throughout,  presumably 
arganonite.  Apical  area  convex,  0.17  mm  long,  defined 
bv  fine  concentric  ridge,  surface  slightly  etched.  Exterior 
surface  at  0.17-0.30  mm  shell  length  essentially  smooth 
apart  from  few,  fine  raised  concentric  growth  lines. 
Thereafter  sculptured  with  strong  concentric  ridges  and 
finer  radial  riblets.  Concentric  ridges  close,  sharply  de- 
fined, broader  than  high,  summits  weakK'  convex,  inter- 
spaces about  half  width  of  each  ridge,  weaker  and  less 
sharply  defined  beside  apertural  margin.  Radial  riblets 
confined  to  interspaces  of  concentric  ridges,  rounded, 
interspaces  slightly  narrower  than  each  riblet,  each  riblet 
about  as  wide  as  interspace  of  each  concentric  ridge. 
Interior  surface  encircled  by  complex  series  of  muscle 
attachment  scars,  of  which  at  least  15  pairs  are  discern- 
able,  through  precise  number  of  muscle  attachment  points 
uncertain,  especially  over  anterior  half.  Animal  un- 
known. 

Type  material:  Holotype  New  Zealand  Oceanographic 
Institute,  Wellington  H.555  (length  1.50  mm,  w  idth  0.88 
mm,  height  0.50  mm). 

Type  locality:  (Figure  1)  Station  U.602,  31°30.7'S, 
172°49.8'E,  northern  Three  Kings  Rise,  northern  New- 
Zealand,  dead  1,216-1,385  m,  rocky  substratum  with 
pumice,  carbonate  sand  and  shell,  February  9,  1988,  R.  V. 
Rapuhia. 

Etymology:  The  species  is  named  for  the  Maori  sea  god 
Tangaroa. 

Discussion:  Compared  with  the  north  Atlantic  species 
Micropilina  miniita  Waren,  1989,  which  it  most  resem- 
bles, M.  tangaroa  differs  in  being  larger  (length  1.50  mm 
compared  with  1.06  mm),  and  in  having  concentric  ridg- 
es that  are  much  larger  both  in  actual  size  and  in  size 
relative  to  the  size  of  the  radial  riblets.  Judging  from  the 
increasing  curvature  of  the  posterior  and  lateral  slopes 
and  the  change  (presumably  senescent)  in  sculpture  be- 
side the  apertural  margin,  the  holotype  of  M.  tangaroa 
is  evidently  an  adult.  Apical  pits  recorded  by  Waren 
(1988,  1989)  were  not  observed  in  the  present  specimen, 
which  is  long  dead,  locally  stained  by  manganese  de- 
position, and  slightly  etched. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

1  thank  curatorial  staff  at  New  Zealand  Oceanographic 
Institute,  Wellington,  for  access  to  sediment  samples  that 
yielded  the  monoplacophoran,  New  Zealand  Geological 
Survey,  Lower  Hutt,  for  scanning  electron  microscopy, 
Mark  Strange  for  photographic  printing  and  Kathleen 
Ryan  for  word  processing. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bouchet,  P.,  J  H  McLean,  and  A.  Waren.  1983.  .\lonopla- 
copliorans  in  the  North  .■\tlantic.  Oeeanologica  Acta  6'.117- 
118. 

Clarke,  A.  H,  and  R.  J.  Menzies.  19.59,  Seopilina  (Vema) 
ewingi,  a  second  new  living  species  of  tlie  Paleozoic  class 
Monoplacophora.  Science  129:1026-1027. 

Knight,  J,  B.  1952.  Primitive  fossil  gastropods  and  their  bear- 
ing on  gastropod  classification.  Smithsonian  Miscellaneous 
Collections  117(13):l-56. 

Lemche,  H,  1957  .\  new  living  deep  .sea  mollusc  of  the 
Cambro-Devonian  class  Monoplacophora.  Nature,  London 
179:41.3-416. 

Lemche,  H.  and  K  G,  Wingstrand.  19.59.  The  anatomy  of 
Neopilina  galatheae  Lemche,  1957.  Galathea  Report  3:9- 
71. 

McLean,  J.  H.  1979.  A  new  monoplacophoran  limpet  from 
the  continental  shelf  off  southern  California.  Contributions 
in  Science.  Natural  Historv  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  Coun- 
ty 307:1-19. 

Menzies,  R.  J.  1968.  New  species  of  Ncopi/ina  of  the  Cambro- 
Devonian  class  Monoplacophora  from  the  Mihie-Edwards 
Deep  of  the  Peru-Chile  Trench,  R/\'  ,\nton  Bruun  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Symposium  on  Mollusca  of  the  Marine 
Biological  .'Association  of  India  3:1-19. 

Menzies,  R.  J.  and  W.  Layton.  1963.  A  new  species  of  mono- 
placophoran mollusc,  Neopilina  (Neopilina)  veleronis  from 
the  slope  of  the  Cedros  Trench,  Mexico.  Annals  and  Mag- 
azine of  Natural  History  ser.  13,  5:401-406. 

Menzies,  R.  J.,  M.  Ewing,  J,  L.  Worzel,  and  A.  H.  C;larke.  1959. 
Ecologv  of  the  Recent  Monoplacophora.  Oikos  10:168- 
182. 

Moskalev,  L.  1.,  Y.  I  Starobogatov,  and  Z.  A.  Filatova.  1983. 
New  data  on  the  abyssal  Monoplacophora  from  the  Pacific 
and  South  Atlantic  Oceans.  Zoologicheski  Zhurnal  112: 
981-995. 

Rokop,  R.  J.  1972.  \  new  species  of  monoplacophoran  from 
the  abyssal  North  Pacific  Veliger  15:91-95. 

Starobogatov,  Y.  I.  and  L.  I  Moskalev.  1987.  Systematics  of 
the  Monoplacophora.  In:  Starobogatov,  Y.  I.,  A.  N.  Goli- 
kov,  and  I.  M.  Likarev  (eds.).  Molluscs,  results  and  per- 
spectives of  investigation.  USSR,  .\cadeniy  of  Sciences, 
Zoological  Institute,  p.  7-11.  Eight  meeting  on  the  inves- 
tigation of  molluscs. 

Tebble,  N.  1967.  A  Neopilina  from  the  Gulf  of  .lAden.  Nature, 
London  215:663-664. 

Tendel,  O.  S.  1985.  Xenophyophores  (Protozoa,  Sarcodina) 
in  the  diet  of  Neopilina  galatheae  (Mollusca,  Monopla- 
cophora). Galathea  Report  1695-98. 

Waren,  A.  1988.  Neopilina  goesi,  a  new  Caribbean  mono- 
placophoran mollusk  dredged  in  1869.  Proceedings  of  the 
Biological  Society  of  Washington  101:671-681 

Waren,  A.  1989.  New  and  little  known  Mollusca  from  Iceland. 
Sarsia  74:1-28. 

Waren,  A.  and  P  Bouchet.  1990.  Laevipilina  rolani,  a  new 
monoplacophoran  from  off  southwestern  Europe.  Journal 
of  Molluscan  Studies  56(3):449-453 

Wenz,  W,  1940  Ursprung  und  friihe  Stammesgeschichte  der 
Gastropoden.  Archiv  fiir  Molluskenkvmde  72:1-10. 

Wingstrand.  K.  G  1985.  On  the  anatom\  and  relationships 
of  Recent  Monoplacophora.  Galathea  Report  16:7-94. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(3):  108-1 10,  1990 


Page  108 


Addenda  to  ^'Distorsio  ridens  (Reeve,  1844):  A  Synonym  of 
Distorsio  clathrata  (Lamarck,  1816) 
(Gastropoda:  Personidae)" 


^  illiam  K.  Emerson 
^  alter  E.  Sage.  Ill 

Department  of  Imertebrates 
American  Museum  of  Natural  History 
New  York,  NY  10024-5192  USA 

We  are  indebted  to  David  Freeman  of  Cape  Town,  South 
Africa  for  calling  our  attention  (in  litt..  June  6,  1990)  to 
an  error  in  our  recent  paper  pertaining  to  the  identity 
of  Distorsio  ridens  (Reeve,  1844)  (Emerson  and  Sage, 
1990).  Through  an  unfortunate  oversight,  a  photograph 
of  the  apertural  view  of  a  paralectotype  of  D.  ridens 
[British  Museum  (Natural  History)  1967630,  =  D.  clath- 
rata (Lamarck,  1816)],  which  was  correctly  cited  and 
illustrated  in  figure  6,  was  inadvertently  substituted  for 
figure  2.  Figure  2  was  erroneously  labeled  the  apertural 
view  of  the  lectotype  of  D.  ridens  [American  Museum 
Natural  History  (AMNH)  6369,  =  D.  clathrata]. 

The  apertural  view  of  the  lectotype  was  previously 
illustrated  by  Lewis  (1972:45,  figure  48)  and  an  enlarge- 
ment of  the  aperture  of  the  lectotype  was  provided  in 
our  paper  (Emerson  and  Sage,  1990,  figure  15).  To  cor- 
rect our  error,  the  entire  view  of  the  ventral  aspect  of 
the  lectotype  is  given  herein  to  compare  with  Reeves 
(1844,  pi.  12,  sp.  46)  original  figure  of  Triton  ridens  [= 
Distorsio  clathrata].  See  figures  1,  2,  herein. 

Reference  also  should  be  made  here  to  the  two  un- 
identified species  of  Distorsio  trawled  in  400  m  off  Cape 
Gardafui  (Ras  Asir),  Somalia  that  were  under  study  by 
us  at  the  time  we  were  preparing  our  review  of  D.  ridens 
(Emerson  and  Sage,  1990:131).  One  of  these  was  de- 
scribed on  March  31,  1990  as  Distorsio  somalica  Parth 
from  "North  of  Mogadishou,  dredged  in  deep  water" 
(Parth,  1990,  figure  1;  herein  figures  9-12).  Parth's  newly 
described  taxon  has  some  morphological  characters  that 
are  reminiscent  of  Distorsio  decipiens  (Reeve,  1844)  and 
D.  reticularis  (Linne,  1758)  [=  D.  reticulata  Roding  1798, 
fide  Beu,  1987:314].  Distorsio  somalica  has  a  larger,  nar- 
rower shell  with  more  prominent  labial  teeth  (as  well  as 
other  differing  sculptural  features)  than  that  of  D.  de- 
cipiens. Distorsio  somalica  resembles  somewhat  the  gen- 
eral shape  of  D.  reticularis,  but  has  a  narrower  shell  with 


weaker  sculpture  and  more  prominent  labial  teeth.  In 
the  past  D.  reticularis  has  been  confused  with  D.  de- 
cipiens (see  Springsteen,  1985).  Parth  (1990:1),  however, 
compared  the  type  specimens  of  D.  somalica  with  D. 
perdistorta  Fulton,  1938. 

The  other  Somalian  specimens  we  examined  are  ap- 
parentK  referable  to  D.  perdistorta.  a  wide-ranging  Indo- 
West  Pacific  species  with  populations  also  in  the  eastern 
and  western  Atlantic  Ocean  (Beu,  1985:62).  Our  speci- 
mens of  D.  perdistorta  from  Somalia  differ  from  the 
shells  of  the  western-Pacific  populations  b\  having  a  wid- 
er, more  inflated  shell,  with  the  expanded  outer  lip  com- 
monly colored  with  tan  rays  and  the  parietal  shield  cov- 
ered (in  all  4  of  the  specimens  examined)  by  a  brightly 
colored  tan  glaze  (herein  figures  3-6).  The  "typical"  Indo- 
Pacific  specimens  of  D.  perdistorta.  which  have  a  nar- 
rower, less  inflated,  but  a  more  distorted  shell  with  a 
whitish  parietal  shield,  however,  are  also  known  from 
off  Madagascar  in  300-340  meters  [N.  of  Nossi  Be,  12°43'S, 
48°15'E,  Academy  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia 
352156  (ANSP)],  as  reported  by  Lewis  (1972:29).  The 
presence  of  both  of  these  forms  in  the  Indian  Ocean 
suggests  that  they  are  likely  only  morphs  of  D.  perdis- 
torta. Compare  figures  3-6  with  figures  7,  8.  Distorsio 
reticularis  (Linne,  1758)  is  also  known  to  occur  in  the 
Indian  Ocean,  as  noted  by  Parth  (1990). 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

In  addition  to  the  courtesy  extended  by  Mr.  Freeman, 
we  are  indebted  to  Mr.  John  Bernard  of  Crossville,  TN 
and  to  Dr.  Gary  Rosenberg  of  the  Philadelphia  .-Kcadem}- 
of  Sciences,  PA  for  kindK-  pro\iding  us  w  ith  the  Somalian 
and  Madagascan  specimens  of  Distorsio.  respectiveK ,  for 
study  and  report.  Dr.  Alan  Beu  of  the  New  Zealand 
Geological  Survey,  Lower  Hutt  generously  contributed 


Figures  1,  2.  Distorsio  ridens  (Reeve.  1844).  1.  Copy  of  original  illustration  of  Triton  ridens  Reeve.  2.  Lectotype  of  Triton 
ridens  Reeve  (AMNH  6369)  Figures  3-8.  Distorsio  perdistorta  Fulton,  1938.  3-6.  Off  Cape  Gardafui,  Somalia,  ex-John  Bernard 
Collection  (3,  4.  AMNH  232148:  H.  6.  AMNH  232147).  7,  8.  North  of  Nossi  Be,  Madagascar  (ANSP  352156)  Figures  9-12. 
Distorsio  somalica  Parth,  1990,  same  locality  data  as  in  figures  3-6  (9,  10.  AMNH  232149;  11.  12.  AMNH  232150)  All  figures 
xl. 


W.  K.  Emerson  and  W.  E.  Sage,  1990 


Page  109 


Page  110 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  3 


additional  data  and  expressed  his  views  on  the  taxonomic 
status  of  the  specimens  from  Somalia.  We  also  thank 
Mr.  Andrew  Modell  and  Ms.  Stephanie  Grooms  of  the 
.\merican  Museum  of  Natural  History  who  undertook 
the  photography  and  the  word-processing  of  the  manu- 
script, respectively. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Beu,  A.  G.  1985.  A  classification  and  catalogue  of  living  world 
Ranellidae  (=  Cymatium  and  Bursidae).  American  Con- 
chologist  (Bulletin  Conchologists  of  America)  13(4):.55-66. 

Beu,  A.  G.  1987  ["1986"].  Taxonomy  of  gastropods  of  the 
families  Ranellidae  (=Cymatiidae)  and  Bursidae.  Part  2. 
Descriptions  of  14  new  modern  Indo-West  Pacific  species 
and  subspecies,  with  revisions  of  related  taxa.  New  Zealand 
Journal  of  Zoology  12(3):273-355  [published  January  28, 
1987,  teste  BeuJ 

Emerson,  W.  K,  and  VV.  E,  Sage,  III.  1990,  Distorsio  ridens 
(Reeve,  1844);  a  synonym  of  Distorsio clathrata  (Lamarck, 
1816)  (Gastropoda:  Personidae).  The  Nautilus  103(4):  131- 
135. 


Fulton,  H  C.    1938.    Descriptions  and  figures  of  new  Japanese 

marine  shells.  Proceedings  of  the  Malacological  Societ\  of 

London  23(l):55-57. 
Lewis,  H.     1972.    Notes  on  the  genus  Distorsio  (Cymatiidae) 

with  descriptions  of  new  species.  The  Nautilus  86(2-4): 

27-50. 
Linne,  C.  von.    1758.    Systema  naturae  per  regna  tria  naturae. 

Editio  decima,  reformata.  Stockholm  11-824 
Parth,  M,    1990.    Distorsio  somalica.  spec,  nov.,  ein  neue  Art. 

aus  Somalia  (Gastropoda.  Ranellidae).  Spixiana  (Miinchen) 

13(l):l-3. 

Reeve,  L.  A.  1844.  Monograph  of  the  genus  Triton.  Con- 
chologia  Iconica:  or  illustrations  of  the  shells  of  molluscous 
animals.  Reeve  Brothers,  London,  2,  Triton  text  and  20 
pis.  [T.  ridens,  sp.  44,  pi.  12,  May  1844;  T.  decipiens,  sp. 
102,  pi.  20,  August,  1844J 

Roding,  P.  F.  1798.  Museum  Boltenianum  ,  .  pars  secunda 
continens  Conchylia.  Hamburg,  i-vii.  1-199  p. 

Springsteen,  F.  J.  1985.  Distorsio  decipiens  (Reeve,  1844),  a 
valid  biospecies  rediscovered.  Cartel  Philippine  Shell  News 
(Manila)  7(5):3-5. 


INSTRUCTIONS  TO  AUTHORS 


THE  NAUTILUS  publishes  papers  on  all  aspects  of  the 
biology  and  systematics  of  mollusks.  Manuscripts  de- 
scribing original,  unpublished  research  as  well  as  review 
articles  will  be  considered.  Brief  articles,  not  exceeding 
1000  words,  will  be  published  as  notes  and  do  not  re- 
quire an  abstract.  Notices  of  meetings  and  other  items 
of  interest  to  malacologists  will  appear  in  a  news  and 
notices  section. 

Manuscripts:  Each  original  manuscript  and  accompa- 
nying illustrations  should  be  submitted  in  triplicate.  Text 
must  be  typed  on  one  side  of  SVa  x  11  inch  white  paper, 
double  spaced  throughout  (including  literature  cited,  ta- 
bles and  figure  captions),  with  at  least  1  inch  of  margin 
on  all  sides.  All  pages  must  be  numbered  consecutively. 
If  printed  on  a  word  processor,  the  right  margin  should 
be  ragged  rather  than  justified.  Authors  should  follow 
the  recommendations  of  the  Council  of  Biology  Editors 
Style  Manual,  which  is  available  from  the  Council  of 
Biology  Editors,  Inc.,  9650  Rockville  Pike,  Bethesda,  MD 
20814,  U.S.A.  The  first  mention  of  a  scientific  name  in 
the  te.xt  should  be  accompanied  by  the  taxonomic  au- 
thority, including  year.  Latin  names  and  words  to  be 
printed  in  italics  must  be  underlined;  leave  other  indi- 
cations to  the  editor.  Metric  and  Celsius  units  are  to  be 
used. 

The  sequence  of  sections  should  be:  title  page,  abstract 
page,  introduction,  materials  and  methods,  results,  dis- 
cussion, acknowledgements,  literature  cited,  tables,  fig- 
ure captions,  figures.  The  title  page  should  include  the 
title,  author's  name(s)  and  address(es).  The  abstract  page 
should  contain  the  title  and  abstract,  which  should  sum- 
marize in  250  words  or  less  the  scope,  main  results  and 
conclusions  of  the  paper.  The  abstract  may  be  followed 
by  a  maximum  of  8  key  words.  All  references  cited  in 
the  text  must  appear  in  the  literature  cited  section  and 
vice  versa.  In  the  literature  cited  section,  all  authors 
must  be  fully  identified  and  listed  alphabetically.  Follow 
a  recent  issue  of  THE  NAUTILUS  for  bibliographic  style, 
noting  that  journal  titles  must  be  unabbreviated.  Infor- 
mation on  plates  and  figures  should  be  cited  only  if  not 
included  in  the  pagination.  Tables  must  be  numbered 
and  each  placed  on  a  separate  sheet.  A  brief  legend  must 
accompany  each  table.  Captions  for  each  group  of  illus- 
trations should  be  typed  on  a  .separate  sheet  and  include 
a  key  to  all  lettered  labeling  appearing  in  that  group  of 
illustrations. 


All  line  drawings  must  be  in  black,  high  quality  ink, 
clearly  detailed  and  completely  labeled.  Photographs 
must  be  on  glossy,  high  contrast  paper.  All  figures  are 
to  be  consecutively  numbered  (figs.  1,  2,  3,  ...  ,  NOT 
figs.  la.  lb,  Ic,  .  .  .  NOR  plate  1,  fig.  1  .  .  .).  Illustrations 
must  be  arranged  in  proportions  that  will  conform  with 
the  width  of  a  page  (6%  inches  or  171  mm)  or  a  column 
{'3Vi  inches  or  82  mm).  The  maximum  size  of  a  printed 
figure  is  6%  by  9  inches  or  171  by  228  mm.  All  illus- 
trations must  be  fully  cropped,  mounted  on  a  firm,  white 
backing,  numbered,  labeled  and  camera  ready.  The  au- 
thor's name,  paper  title  and  figure  number(s)  should  ap- 
pear on  the  back.  Original  illustrations  must  be  between 
one  and  two  times  the  desired  final  size.  It  is  the  author's 
responsibility  that  the  line  weight  and  lettering  are  ap- 
propriate for  the  desired  reduction.  Original  illustrations 
will  be  returned  to  the  author  if  requested.  Color  illus- 
trations can  be  included  at  extra  cost  to  the  author. 

Voucher  Material:  Deposition  of  type  material  in  a 
recognized  public  museum  is  a  requirement  for  publi- 
cation of  papers  in  which  new  species  are  described. 
Deposition  of  representative  voucher  specimens  in  such 
institutions  is  strongly  encouraged  for  all  other  types  of 
research  papers. 

Processing  of  Manuscripts:  Upon  receipt,  every  manu- 
script is  acknowledged  and  sent  for  critical  review  by  at 
least  two  referees.  These  reviews  serve  as  the  basis  for 
acceptance  or  rejection.  Accepted  manuscripts  are  re- 
turned to  the  author  for  consideration  of  the  reviewers' 
comments.  A  finalized  version  of  the  manuscript  is  re- 
turned to  the  editor  and  sent  to  press.  Two  sets  of  proofs 
are  sent  to  the  author  for  correction.  Changes  other  than 
typesetting  errors  will  be  charged  to  the  author  at  cost. 
One  set  of  corrected  proofs  should  be  sent  to  the  editor 
as  soon  as  possible.  Authors  with  institutional,  grant  or 
other  research  support  will  be  billed  for  page  charges  at 
the  rate  of  $60.00  per  printed  page. 

An  order  form  for  reprints  will  accompany  the  proofs. 
Reprints  may  be  ordered  through  the  editor. 

Manuscripts,  corrected  proofs  and  correspondence  re- 
garding editorial  matters  should  be  sent  to:  Dr.  M.G. 
Harasewych,  Editor,  Division  of  Mollusks,  NHB  stop  118, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  In- 
stitution, Washington,  DC  20560,  USA. 


THIS  PUBLICATION  IS  PRINTED  ON  ACID-FREE  PAPER. 


rHE  NAUTILUS 


Volume  104,  Number  4 
December  13,  1990 
ISSN  0028-1344 


A  quarterly  devoted 
to  malacology. 


Maiiiie  Biological  Laboratory  .. 
LIBRARY  i 

DEC  2  6  1990 


Woods  ^^■'■'«.  Mass. 


EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 
Dr.  M  G.  Harasewych 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 

ASSOCIATE  EDITOR 
Dr.  R.  Tucker  Abbott 
American  Malacologists,  Inc. 
P.O.  Box  2255 
Melbourne,  FL  32902 


CONSULTING  EDITORS 
Dr.  Riidigcr  Bieler 
Department  of  Invertebrates 
Field  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Chicago,  IL  60605 

Dr.  Robert  T.  Dillon,  Jr. 
Department  of  Biology 
College  of  Charleston 
Charleston,  SC  29424 

Dr.  William  K.  Emerson 

Department  of  Living  Invertebrates 

The  American  Museum  of  Natural 

History 

New  York,  NY  10024 

Mr.  Samuel  L.  H.  Fuller 
1053  Mapleton  Avenue 
Suffield,  CT  06078 

Dr.  Robert  Hershler 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 

Dr.  Richard  S.  Houbrick 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


Mr.  Richard  I.  Johnson 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Aurele  La  Rocque 
Department  of  Geology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  James  H.  McLean 
Department  of  Malacology 
Los  Angeles  County  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
900  Exposition  Boulevard 
Los  Angeles,  CA  90007 

Dr.  Arthur  S.  Merrill 
%  Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Ms.  Paula  M.  Mikkelsen 
Harbor  Branch  Oceanographic 
Institution,  Inc. 
Ft.  Pierce,  FL  33450 

Dr.  Donald  R.  Moore 

Division  of  Marine  Geology 

and  Geophysics 

Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  and 

Atmospheric  Science 

University  of  Miami 

4600  Rickenbacker  Causeway 

Miami,  FL  33149 

Mr.  Richard  E.  Petit 

P.O.  Box  30 

North  Myrtle  Beach,  SC  29582 

Dr.  Edward  J.  Petuch 
Department  of  Geology 
Florida  Atlantic  University 
Boca  Raton,  FL  33431 

Dr.  David  H.  Stansbery 
Museum  of  Zoology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 


Dr.  Ruth  D.  Turner 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Geerat  J.  Vermeij 
Department  of  Geology 
University  of  California  at  Davis 
Davis,  CA  95616 


SUBSCRIPTION  INFORMATION 

The  subscription  rate  per  volume 
is  US  $25.00  for  individuals,  US 
$35.00  for  institutions.  Postage 
outside  the  United  States  is  an 
additional  US  $4.00  for  surface 
and  US  $12.00  for  air  mail.  All 
orders  should  be  accompanied  b) 
payment  and  sent  to:  THE 
NAUTILUS,  P.O.  Box  7279,  Silver 
Spring,  MD  20907-7279,  USA. 

Change  of  address:    Please  inform 
the  publisher  of  your  new  address 
at  least  6  weeks  in  advance.  All 
communications  should  include 
both  old  and  new  addresses  (with 
zip  codes)  and  stale  the  effective 
date. 

THE  NAUTILUS  (ISSN  0028- 
1344)  is  published  quarterly  by 
Trophon  Corporation,  8911  Alton 
Parkway,  Silver  Spring,  MD  20910. 

Second  Class  postage  paid  at  Silver 
Spring,  MD  and  additional  mailing 
offices. 

POSTMASTER:  Send  address 
changes  to:  THE  NAUTILUS 
P.O.  Box  7279 
Silver  Spring,  MD  20907-7279 


THE  €9  NAUTILUS 


CONTENTS 


Volume  104,  Number  4 

December  IS.  1990 

ISSN  0028-1344 


Ronald  W.  Gilmer 


Procymhiilia  philiporum  new  species,  with  a  discussion  of 

the  genus  Procymhtilia  Meisenheimer,  1905  (Gastropoda: 

Thecosomata)  Ill 

Studies  on  bathyal  and  abyssal  Buccinidae  (Gastropoda: 

Neogastropoda):  1.  Metula  fiisiformis  Clench  and  Aguayo, 

1941  120 

Bellascintilla  parmaleeana  new  genus  and  species  from 

the  tropical  eastern  Pacific,  with  a  review  of  the  other, 

ventrally  notched  galeommatid  genera  (Bivalvia: 

Gaieommatacea)  130 

Malacology  or  Conchology? 145 


M.  G.  Harasewych 


C.  Clifton  Coney 


Robert  Robertson 


Marine  Biological  Laboratory   i 
LIBRARY 

DEC  2  6  1990 

Woods  Hole,  Mass. 


SMITHSONIAN  FUNDS  FOR  MALACOLOGY  STUDENTS 

The  Division  of  Mollusks,  Department  of  Invertebrate  Zoology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  Histor\ ,  Smithsonian 
Institution  announces  the  availability  of  the  Rosewater  Fellow  Award  (up  to  $1,000)  to  be  awarded  to  graduate  students 
of  systematic  malacology.  This  award  provides  support  for  students  conducting  systematic  studies  of  MoUusca  (leading 
to  publication)  who  require  access  to  collections  and  libraries  of  the  Division  of  Mollusks,  National  Museum  of  Natural 
History.  Funds  can  be  used  for  travel,  subsistence,  and  research  costs.  Interested  students  should  submit  a  succinct 
proposal  (1-2  pages),  including  budget  with  indication  of  any  matching  funds,  and  a  supporting  letter  from  faculty 
advisor(s).  Application  deadline  is  January  31,  1991.  Award(s)  will  be  announced  on  April  15,  1991. 
Applications  should  be  sent  to: 

Dr.  R,  S.  Houbrick 
Division  of  Mollusks/NHB  stop  118 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560  USA 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(4):111-119,  1990 


Page  111 


Procijmbiilia  philiporum  New  Species,  with  a 

Discussion  of  the  Genus  Procymbulia  Meisenheimer,  1905 

(Gastropoda:  Thecosomata) 


Ronald  W.  Gilmer 

Marine  Science  Division 
Harbor  Branch  Oceanographic 

Institution 
5600  Old  Dixie  Hwv 
Fort  Pierce,  FL  34946,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Procymbulia  philiporum,  new  species,  is  described  from  sub- 
mersible collections  in  the  Bahamas.  This  species  retains  a  coiled 
shell  but  exhibits  unique  characters  not  known  for  other  pseu- 
dothecosomes.  It  displays  an  extensive  wingplate  reminiscent 
of  the  famiK  Cymbuliidae  and  encases  its  calcareous  shell  in 
a  voluminous  pseudoconch.  Thus  P  philiporum  displays  key 
characters  of  both  the  Peraclididae  and  the  Cymbuliidae.  This 
species  is  most  appropriately  placed  in  the  genus  Procymbulia 
Meisenheimer,  1905,  within  the  Family  Peraclididae  Tesch, 
1913,  to  distinguish  its  transitional  nature. 

Key  words:    Pteropod;  Thecosomata;  Procymbulia,  Peraclis. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  genus  Procymbulia  Meisenheimer,  1905,  was  estab- 
hshed  from  observations  of  a  single  preserved  specimen 
of  the  type  species,  P.  valdiviae  Meisenheimer,  1905, 
collected  in  the  southern  Indian  Ocean.  This  genus  is  of 
special  interest  since  even  the  damaged  specimens  thus 
far  described  display  various  morphological  characters 
that  relate  it  both  to  the  shelled  Peraclis  Forbes,  1844, 
and  to  the  shell-less  cymbuliids.  Thus  it  has  been  con- 
sidered a  "missing  link"  (Meisenheimer,  1905;  Tesch, 
1913)  between  the  shell-bearing  genera  of  the  Theco- 
somata and  genera  of  the  gelatinous  pseudothecosomes 
(Cymbuliidae)  which  only  possess  a  calcareous  shell  as 
larvae  {e.g.,  Lalli  and  Gilmer,  1989).  Approximately  64 
specimens  from  various  expeditions  and  usually  from 
deep  tows  have  been  ascribed  to  this  genus  (Bonnevie, 
1913;  Massy,  1932;  Tesch,  1913,  1946,  1948;  Hubendick, 
1951).  No  species  of  Procymbulia  has  ever  been  collected 
intact.  Tesch  (1948)  obtained  sufficient  shell  remnants 
from  the  Dana  Expedition  material  to  piece  together  the 
shape  of  what  he  considered  to  be  the  shell  of  P.  valdiviae 
Meisenheimer,  1905.  Although  the  shell  differed  from 
those  of  all  previously  described  Peraclis  species,  Tesch 
concluded  that  the  morphological  differences  displayed 


by  his  specimens  did  not  warrant  the  erection  of  a  sep- 
arate transitional  genus. 

I  here  describe  the  first  living,  intact  specimen  of  a 
Procymbulia  species,  which  1  ascribe  to  a  new  species. 
It  was  collected  alive  at  902  m  with  a  manned  sub- 
mersible. The  animal  exhibits  key  characters  of  both  the 
Cymbuliidae  and  of  the  Peraclididae.  These  data  war- 
rant the  reinstatement  of  the  genus  Procymbulia  Mei- 
senheimer, 1905. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

In  the  present  description  of  the  new  Procymbulia  spe- 
cies I  have  assumed  that  the  shell  and  wingplate  axes 
run  anterior-posterior  (table  1).  This  terminology  was 
established  by  Lalli  and  Gilmer  (1989)  for  correct  ori- 
entation of  the  body  of  pseudothecosomes  (Families:  Per- 
aclididae, Cymbuliidae)  to  the  shell  and  pseudoconch. 
Live  pseudothecosomes  are  normally  oriented  with  their 
ventral  surface  facing  up.  The  proboscis  and  mouth  are 
situated  directly  over  the  apex  of  the  shell  (in  Peraclis) 
or  over  the  blunt  enlarged  end  of  the  pseudoconch  (in 
cymbuliids).  The  median  lobe  of  the  wingplate  is  situated 
on  the  margin  opposite  the  proboscis  and  lies  directly 
over  (ventral  to)  the  pallial  cavity  opening.  Thus  the  axis 
of  the  wingplate  runs  anterior-posterior  in  relation  to  the 
shell.  This  orientation  is  displayed  by  all  live  pseudoth- 
ecosomes (excluding  Desmopterus  Chun,  1889)  and  bears 
no  resemblance  to  descriptions  of  preserved  specimens 
of  Peraclis  or  Procymbulia  species  {e.g.,  Meisenheimer, 
1906;  Tesch,  1948;  Spoel,  1976).  Preserved  specimens  are 
usually  contracted  and  have  the  mantle  cavity  displaced 
laterally,  towards  the  left  or  "dorsal"  side  of  the  shell  in 
a  manner  that  can  resemble  live  specimens  of  the  Li- 
macinidae  (Euthecosomata).  Thus  coiled  pseudotheco- 
somes are  often  erroneously  considered  analogous  with 
the  Limacinidae  in  regard  to  their  body  and  shell  ori- 
entation because  of  these  preservation  artifacts. 

The  single  specimen  was  collected  b\  the  JOHNSON 
SEA-LINK  I  submersible  using  a  7.5  liter  acrylic  sampler 


Page  112 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


I'able  1.    Terminology  used  for  orientation  of  soft  part  morphology  of  Procymbitlia  by  various  authors  compared  to  the  present 
description. 


Soft  part 

Meisenheimer  (1905) 

Tesch  (1948) 

This  paper 

W'ingpiate  axis 

dorsoventral 

dorsoventral 

anterior-posterior 

Median  lobe  of  wingplate 

ventral 

ventral 

anteroventral 

Proboscis 

dorsal 

dorsal 

posteroventral 

Tentacles 

dorsal 

dorsal 

posterior 

Pallial  cavity 

ventral 

dorsal 

anteroventral 

Gill 

— 

ventral  to  right 

anterior  on  midline 

Anus 

right 

left 

anterior  on  right 

with  lids  at  either  end  that  move  horizontally  over  the 
openings  to  assure  gentle  collection  (Tietze  and  Clark, 
1986).  The  sampler  is  sealed  when  closed  so  that  there 
is  no  exchange  of  water  during  return  to  the  surface. 
The  specimen  was  immediately  transferred  to  a  0.5  liter 
glass  dish  and  maintained  at  8  °C  on  board  ship  for 
observation  and  photography.  Photographs  were  taken 
using  a  Zeiss  Tessovar  macrolens  fitted  with  an  Olympus 
OM-2  camera  body  and  dark  field  illumination.  All  pho- 
tographs were  taken  with  Kodak  K-25  color  slide  film  or 
Panatomic-X  black  and  white  film.  The  specimen  was 
preserved  in  a  2%  final  solution  of  unbuffered  glutaral- 
dehyde  and  transferred  to  70%  ethanol  after  two  weeks. 
The  specimens  was  not  dissected  and  is  deposited  in  the 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  In- 
stitution (USNM  860550). 


SYSTEMATICS 

Family:  Peraclididae  Tesch,  1913 
Genus:  Procymbulia  Meisenheimer,  1905 

The  original  characters  of  this  genus  based  on  Meisen- 
heimer s  original  description  of  P.  valdiviae  include:  a 
ventral  (see  table  1)  mantle  cavity  that  opens  beneath 
the  wingplate  opposite  the  margin  bearing  the  proboscis; 
a  cymbuliid-like  gelatinous  wingplate  with  similar  mus- 
cle pattern;  a  more  elongated  proboscis  than  Peraclis; 
sensory  processes  bordering  the  median  lobe  of  the  wing- 
plate; no  operculum;  shell  unknown,  but  presumed  to  be 
depressed  based  on  soft  part  morphology. 

Procymbulia  philiporum  new  species 
(figures  1-12) 

Description:  Coiled  pseudothecosome  pteropod  but 
closely  resembling  Corolla  Dall,  1871,  in  general  ap- 
pearance. Wingplate  gelatinous,  oval,  highly  patterned 
with  muscle,  transparent  at  margins  but  becoming  thick 
and  light  brown  near  the  centerline.  Calcareous  shell 
with  four  whorls,  thin,  brown  colored,  sinistrally  coiled. 
Shell  depressed;  spire  and  body  whorl  with  prominent 


growth  striae  parallel  to  aperture;  aperture  broad  and 
drawn  out  in  an  elongated  manner  without  a  sharply 
pointed  rostrum;  columellar  lip  reduced.  Shell  internal 
within  a  voluminous  gelatinous  pseudoconch.  Pseudo- 
conch  oval,  Coro//a-like  in  shape  and  consistency,  length 
1.5  X  width,  with  broadly  oval  opening  coinciding  with 
shell  aperture.  Proboscis  extending  at  90°  angle  to  wing- 
plate surface,  with  darkly  pigmented  ciliary  tracks  sur- 
rounding mouth.  Two  unsheathed,  equal  tentacles  on 
posterior  surface  of  proboscis.  Wingplate  with  distinct 
median  lobe  on  anterior  margin;  lateral  sensory  processes 
on  either  side  of  median  lobe  but  not  extending  beyond 
wingplate  margin.  No  operculum  present. 

Type  locality:  Approximately  3  km  SW  of  Moore  Island 
in  the  Northwest  Providence  Channel,  Bahamas 
(26°14.76'N,  77°43.46'W).  Depth  of  collection:  902  m  in 
midwater;  time:  2300  hrs;  3  Nov  1989;  temperature  at 
collection  depth:  6.7  °C;  surface  temperature:  28.5  °C. 
One  specimen. 

Etymology:  This  species  in  named  in  honor  of  Dr.  Philip 
Pugh,  the  scientific  observer,  and  Mr.  Philip  Santos,  the 
submersible  pilot,  who  together  collected  the  specimen. 

Dimensions  alive:  Wingplate  width:  20.2  mm;  pseu- 
doconch length:  11.3  mm;  pseudoconch  maximum  width: 
7.3  mm;  shell  height:  7.5  mm,  maximum  shell  width:  4.5 
mm.  Dimensions  preserved:  Wingplate  width:  11.2  mm 
(highly  contracted). 

Remarks:  Procymbulia  philiporum  possesses  a  finely 
sculptured,  calcareous,  sinistrally  coiled  shell  (figures  1- 
10).  It  is  very  fragile  and  of  a  uniform  chestnut  brown 
color  (figures  1,  2),  differing  considerably  in  structure 
from  that  of  P.  valdiviae  as  described  by  Tesch  (1948). 
The  shell  of  P.  philiporum  is  distinguished  by  its  well- 
defined  growth  striae  (figures  1-10)  that  lie  parallel  to 
the  aperture  on  the  spire  and  body  whorl.  The  spire  is 
depressed  (figures  9,  10).  There  are  no  keels  or  ribs  along 
the  suture  and  there  are  no  spiral  ribs  on  the  body  whorl 
as  Tesch  (1948)  described  as  the  major  character  of  the 
shell  of  P.  valdiviae.  The  anterior  margin  of  the  aperture 


Figures  1-3.  Procymlmlia  philiporum  new  species.  1.  From  life,  posterior  view  turned  slightly  so  the  left  side  and  ventral  surface 
of  the  wingplate  are  exposed.  Compare  with  figure  4  for  labels  Magnification  ca.  8  x .  2.  Posterior  view,  show  ing  close  up  of  shell 
apex  and  proboscis;  compare  with  figure  7  for  labels  Magnification  ca.  12  x.  3.  .Anterior  view  from  the  left  side  showing  exposed 
pallial  cavity.  The  gill  and  pallial  gland  are  visible;  compare  with  figures  8  and  11  for  labels.  Magnification  ca.  10  x. 


R.  W.  Gilmer,  1990 


Page  113 


Page  114 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No,  4 


Figures  4-8.  Procymlmlia  philiporum  new  species.  4.  Posterior  view  showing  the  left  and  ventral  surfaces,  same  as  figure  1.  Scale 
=  2  mm.  5.  Posterior  view  profile.  Scale  =  2  mm.  6.  Dorsal  view;  the  proboscis  is  visible  through  the  transparent  pseudoconch. 
Scale  =  2  mm    7.  Posterior  view  showing  close-up  of  shell  ape.x  and  proboscis.  Scale  =  1  mm   8.  .\iiterior  view  from  the  left  side 


R.  W.  Gilmer,  1990 


Page  1 15 


(figure  9)  is  broadly  expanded  in  an  elongated  manner 
without  a  sharply  pointed  rostrum,  in  contrast  to  the 
pointed  rostrum  of  P.  valdiviae  {i.e.,  Tesch,  1948)  and 
of  ail  Peraclis  species.  I  detected  no  reticulation  on  the 
shell  surface.  The  thin  shell  could  not  be  removed  from 
the  animal  without  destruction.  Consequently  it  dis- 
solved after  several  weeks  in  the  preservative. 

The  shell  is  enclosed  in  a  large  gelatinous  pseudoconch 
(figures  1-8)  of  the  same  character  and  proportional  size 
as  those  of  cymbuliids.  The  pseudoconch  is  enclosed  within 
a  delicate  layer  of  epithelium  that  does  not  appear  to 
bear  pigment  or  chromatophores  as  is  common  in  the 
cymbuliids  (Lalli  and  Gilmer,  1989).  The  pseudoconch 
appers  to  be  connected  to  the  shell  surface  by  a  series  of 
fine  threads  (figure  7,  FT).  On  the  anterior  end,  there  is 
a  pronounced  cavity  between  the  shell  and  pseudoconch 
(figures  3,  8)  that  is  lined  with  a  dark  brown  layer  of 
tissue.  The  pseudoconch  also  dissolved  in  the  preservative 
although  the  epithelial  layer  that  enclosed  it  remained 
as  a  membrane  around  the  visceral  nucleus. 

The  midline  of  the  wingplate  is  situated  directly  over 
the  posterior-anterior  axis  of  the  shell  and  pseudoconch 
(figures  1-7).  The  proboscis  bearing  the  mouth  (figures 
4,  5,  P)  projects  ventral-most  at  90°  from  the  posterior 
\\  ingplate  margin,  directly  over  the  apex  of  the  shell  and 
the  blunt,  posterior  end  of  the  pseudoconch.  The  expan- 
sive wingplate  extends  laterally  and  anteriorly,  with  a 
large  median  lobe  (figures  4,  7,  8,  ML)  extending  ante- 
rior-most, beyond  the  apertures  of  both  the  shell  and 
pseudoconch.  On  either  side  of  the  median  lobe,  small 
dense  patches  occur  near  the  wing  border  (figures  4,  11, 
SP)  uiat  appear  to  be  concentrations  of  nerve  fibrils  and 
canals  that  converge  from  within  the  wingplate.  They 
are  not  large,  distinct  processes  as  described  in  P.  val- 
c'iviae  {cf.  Meisenheimer,  1905;  Massy,  1932). 

The  wingplate  is  thick  and  heavily  cross-patterned 
with  muscle  fibers  (figures  1-8)  which  resemble  the  pat- 
tern seen  in  Corolla  species  (personal  observation).  The 
wingplate  varies  from  almost  transparent  at  the  margins 
to  light  brow  n  near  the  center  line  and  around  the  base 
of  the  proboscis  (figures  2,  7).  The  ciliated  grooves  of  the 
lateral  foot  lobes  nearest  the  mouth  are  nearly  black  in 
color  (figures  2,  7),  but  become  almost  transparent  at 
their  distal  margins  (figure  1).  The  unpaired  median  foot 
lobe  (figure  11,  MFL)  forms  a  low  border  anterior  to  the 
mouth  and  appears  as  a  light  brown  extension  off  the 
wingplate.  The  paired  tentacles  (figure  5,  T)  resemble 
those  of  P.  valdiviae  (cf.  Meisenheimer,  1905).  They  are 
of  equal  size,  unsheathed,  and  lie  on  the  posterior  surface 
of  the  proboscis.  The  base  of  each  tentacle  is  darkly 
pigmented  but  each  terminates  in  a  round,  light-colored 
patch  on  the  tip  (figures  2,  7).  The  penis  extends  from 


10 


Figures  9-10.    Procijmlmlia  philiporurn  new  species.  9.  Shell, 
ventral  view  showing  aperture    10.  Shell,  dor.sal  view. 


an  opening  near  the  base  of  the  proboscis,  below  (dorsal 
to)  the  left  tentacle  (figure  7,  PN). 

The  pallial  cavity  opens  broadly  across  the  anterior 
portion  of  the  shell  aperture  (figures  .3,  8,  11).  The  an- 
terior end  of  the  pseudoconch  is  supported  by  a  thick 
integument  (figures  6,  11,  IN)  that  extends  from  the 
pallial  cavity.  This  integument  appears  to  be  the  base  of 
the  epithelium  that  encloses  the  pseudoconch.  Above 
(ventral  to)  this  integument,  a  thick  layer  of  the  mantle 
(figures  6,  8,  11,  MT)  protrudes  anteriorly  beyond  the 
aperture.  The  oval-shaped  pallial  gland  is  located  on  the 
ventral  surface  of  this  mantle  layer.  No  "balancer"  struc- 
ture {cf.  Meisenheimer,  1905)  occurs  on  the  mantle  bor- 
der of  P.  philiporum.  Ventral  to  the  pallial  gland,  a  large 
plicate  gill  (figures  3,  8,  11,  12,  G)  originates  from  the 
right  side  of  the  visceral  mass  and  extends  anteriorly. 
When  fully  expanded  in  life,  the  gill  protrudes  slightly 
beyond  the  shell  and  lies  along  the  midline  of  the  pallial 
cavity,  obscuring  the  pallial  gland.  The  gill  presents  a 
large  smooth  surface  with  no  deep  furrows. 

The  intestine  originates  posteriorly,  near  the  gonad 
(figure  12)  and  ends  anteriorly  on  the  right  side  of  the 
pallial  cavity  near  the  gill.  In  its  course  (figure  12),  it 
first  encircles  the  viscera  between  the  gonad  and  the 
digestive  gland;  it  next  extends  anteriorly  along  the  right 
side  of  the  mantle  cavity;  it  again  encircles  the  anterior 
portion  of  the  viscera  before  extending  into  the  pallial 
cavity.  The  anus  opens  to  the  right  of  the  gill  at  the  end 
of  a  long  and  seemingly  unsupported  extension  of  the 
intestine  (figures  11,  12,  A),  Because  the  anus  and  lower 


showing  exposed  pallial  cavity  with  gill  and  pallial  gland.  Scale  =  1  mm.  Abbreviations:  CG,  central  ganglion;  FT,  fine  threads 
connecting  shell  and  pseudoconch;  G,  gill;  GN,  gonad;  IN,  integument  supporting  anterior  end  of  p.seudoconch;  IT,  intestine;  M, 
mouth;  ML,  median  lobe  of  wingplate;  MT,  mantle  tissue;  P,  proboscis;  PC,  pseudoconch;  PG,  pallial  gland;  PN,  penis;  S,  shell;  SP, 
sensory  processes;  T,  tentacle;  WP,  wingplate. 


Page  1 16 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


dorsal 


2  mm 


Figure  11.  Procymbulia  philiporum  new  species.  Anterior  view  from  the  left  side  showing  paHial  cavity.  Compare  with  figures 
3  and  8  The  posterior-anterior  and  dorsal-ventral  axes  of  the  shell  are  shown  The  gill  is  retracted,  but  can  extend  beyond  the 
anterior  shell  border.  A,  anus;  DG,  digestive  gland;  G,  gill;  IN,  integument  supporting  pseudoconch;  IT,  intestine;  LFL,  lateral  foot 
lobes  (paired);  MFL,  median  foot  lobe  (unpaired);  ML,  median  lobe  of  wingplate;  MT,  mantle  tissue;  PC,  pseudoconch;  PG,  pallial 
gland;  S,  shell;  SP,  sensory  processes;  WP,  wingplate. 


intestine  have  twisted  back  in  a  loop  to  the  left  side  of 
the  mantle  cavity  in  the  preserved  specimen,  the  intes- 
tinal path  of  P.  philiporum  resembles  the  "Type  A" 
diagram  of  Tesch  (1948:  figure  34E). 

Live  observations:  The  animal  was  neutrally  buoyant 
in  the  center  of  the  sampler  on  return  to  the  surface  and 
slowly  swam  about  the  container  when  disturbed.  It  swam 
by  undulations  of  the  wingplate  in  the  manner  of  the 
cymbuliids  (Morton,  1964;  Lalli  and  Gilmer,  1989)  and 
appeared  to  be  healthy  with  no  apparent  signs  of  damage. 
The  animal  never  attempted  to  retract  into  the  shell  even 
after  severe  prodding  and  indeed  this  would  not  appear 
possible  given  the  size  of  the  wingplate. 

The  intestine  appeared  to  be  full  throughout  its  length, 
and  several  fecal  pellets  were  produced  during  obser- 
vation. The  pellets  were  released  into  the  pallial  cavity 
and  discarded  off  the  anterior  surface  of  the  body  by 
ciliary  currents  on  the  mantle.  They  were  roughly  3  to 
4  mm  long  and  0.5  mm  in  width.  Recognizable  contents 
included  broken  foraminifera  tests,  crustacean  exoskel- 
eton  fragments,  and  coccolithophores.  No  particles  in  the 
fecal  contents  were  larger  than  40  ^m. 


DISCUSSION 

Procymbulia  philiporum  clearly  displays  characters  of 
both  the  Peraclididae  and  the  Cymbuliidae  (Table  2), 


and  points  to  the  close  affinity  between  these  families.  It 
therefore  seems  reasonable  to  reinstate  the  genus  Pro- 
cymbulia Meisenheimer,  1905,  to  emphasize  its  transi- 
tional nature.  Procymbulia  philiporum  clearK'  shows  close 
affinity  to  the  family  Peraclididae  with  respect  to  the 
coiled  shell  and  the  orientation  of  its  internal  organs. 
However,  several  new  traits  of  the  Peraclididae  are  now- 
apparent  based  on  this  description:  First,  the  shell  can 
be  totally  enclosed  in  a  gelatinous  pseudoconch,  similar 
to  those  characteristic  of  the  Cymbuliidae.  Secondly,  the 
wingplate  can  have  a  broad  highly  gelatinous  nature  also 
similar  to  the  Cymbuliidae.  Thirdly,  an  operculum  can 
be  absent  and  the  shell  can  lack  suture  ornamentation 
and  a  pointed  rostrum.  Lastly,  the  animal  may  not  be 
capable  of  retraction  into  the  shell. 

Meisenheimer  (1905)  established  Procymbulia  as  a 
transition  genus  mostly  because  the  pallial  cavity  of  his 
specimen  was  comparable  in  position  to  that  of  the  cym- 
buliids and  opposed  by  180°  in  comparison  to  those  of 
either  Peraclis  or  Limacina.  In  fact,  the  pallial  cavity 
and  wingplate  of  living  specimens  of  Peraclis  species  and 
P.  philiporum  have  a  similar  orientation  with  respect  to 
their  shells  and  neither  resembles  the  orientation  of  Lim- 
acina. More  accurate  characters  on  which  to  distinguish 
Procymlnilia  are  the  combined  presence  of  the  shell  and 
pseudoconch,  and  the  gelatinous  Coro//a-Iike  wingplate. 

Although  Peraclis  and  Procymbulia  have  coiled  shells, 
both  display   an   important   pseudothecosome  trait   by 


R.  W.  Gilmer,  1990 


Page  117 


posterior 


anterior 

Figure  12.  Procymbiilia  philipurum  new  species.  Course  of 
intestine  (IT),  mantle  removed.  A,  anus;  DG,  digestive  gland; 
ES,  esophagus;  G,  gill;  GN,  gonad;  PG,  pallial  gland;  ST,  stom- 
ach. 


Figure  13.  Peraclis  bispinosa  from  life,  posteroventral  view, 
wingplate(WP)  fully  expanded;  mantle  covering  the  shell  (MT) 
is  retracted  so  that  the  ape.\  is  visible.  Scale  =  2  mm.  ML, 
median  lobe  of  wingplate;  P,  proboscis;  S,  shell 

encloses  the  shell  in  life  (personal  observation).  Procym- 
biilia philiporum,  however,  more  closely  resembles  the 
cymbuliids  by  encasing  its  shell  in  a  pseudoconch,  and 
by  its  apparent  inability  to  retract  into  its  shell  possibly 
explaining  the  loss  of  the  operculum.  The  wingplate  of 
P.  philiporum  is  also  much  more  cymbuliid-like  in  thick- 
ness, muscle  pattern,  and  general  shape  than  I  have  seen 
in  Peraclis. 

Since  Tesch  (1948)  closely  linked  Procymbulia  val- 
diviae  to  Peraclis  bispinosa,  I  have  shown  a  partially 
expanded,  living  specimen  of  the  latter  species  (figure 
13)  for  comparison  with  P.  philiporum.  Procymbulia 
bispinosa  has  a  more  heavily  pigmented  wingplate  and 
proboscis  than  P.  philiporum,  but  the  wingplate  is  re- 
duced in  thickness,  in  extent  of  muscle  bands,  and  in  size 
relative  to  the  shell.  The  proboscis  and  gill'  of  P.  bispi- 


making  them  functionally  internal  structures  (Gilmer 
and  Harbison,  1986;  personal  observation).  At  least  three 
species  of  Peraclis  [P.  reticulata  (D'Orbignv,  1836),  P. 
bispinosa  Pelseneer,  1888  (figure  13),  and  P.  apicifulva 
Meisenheimer,  1906]  have  mantle  tissue  that  completely 


'  Note;  In  a  previous  description  of  Peraclis  (Lalli  and  (Kil- 
mer, 1989),  we  erred  in  stating  that  the  gill  was  only  retracted 
mantle  tissue.  I  have  now  examined  the  gill  in  P.  reticulata, 
P.  bispinosa,  and  P.  apicifulva. 


Table  2.    Comparison  of  major  traits  of  the  Peraclididae  and  C\  mbuliidae  prior  to  this  description  of  Procymlnilia. 


Peraclididae 


Cvmbuliidae 


Coiled  shell  present  with  prolongation  of  columella 

Shell  axis  oriented  along  posterior-anterior  body  axis 

Shell  often  enclosed  by  voluminous  mantle  tissue 

Operculum  circular,  glassy,  left  handed 

Proboscis  comprised  of  three  footlobes  fused  to  wingplate 

Anus  opens  to  the  right  inside  pallial  cavity 

Uniform  pallial  gland,  without  transparent  bands 

Plicate  ctenidium  present  in  pallial  cavity 

Well  developed  buccal  mass  present 

Retracts  completely  into  shell 


Calcareous  shell  in  larval  stage  onK 

Body  highly  gelatinous,  wingplate  up  to  2 x  bod\  length 

Shell  replaced  in  adults  b\  gelatinous  pseudoconch 

Operculum  left  handed  in  larval  forms 

Proboscis  similar,  capable  of  great  expansion  in  some  genera 

Anus  opens  to  left  side  of  pallial  cavity 

Pallial  gland  usually  divided  by  transparent  bands 

No  true  ctenidium  present 

Buccal  mass  reduced  or  absent  in  most  species 

No  retraction  mechanism  after  larval  stage 


Page  118 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


nosa  are  remarkably  similar  in  structure  to  those  of  P. 
philiporum.  Althouj^h  P.  bispitwsa  has  extensive  mantle 
that  normally  surrounds  the  shell,  the  live  specimen  in 
figure  13  w  as  also  carefully  collected  with  the  JOHNSON 
SEA-LINK  and  shows  no  evidence  of  a  pseudoconch.  In 
addition,  P.  bispinosa  is  capable  of  complete  retraction 
into  its  shell. 

Most  descriptions  of  pseudothecosomes  are  greatly 
hampered  by  the  condition  of  the  material.  Much  of  the 
described  variation  in  Peraclis  species  is  due  to  twisting 
of  the  pallial  cavity  or  wingplate  (e.g.,  Tesch,  1948:  figure 
34a, b),  during  retraction.  The  mantle  is  much  more  ex- 
tensive in  living  specimens  than  in  preserved  material 
which  always  shows  tremendous  variation.  In  addition, 
the  same  confusion  in  Peraclis  regarding  terms  used  to 
describe  the  orientation  of  the  soft  parts  with  the  shell 
(Gilmer  and  Harbison,  1986;  Lalli  and  Gilmer,  1989)  also 
exists  for  Procymbulia  (table  1). 

Descriptions  of  Procymhnilia  valdiviae  (Meisenheimer, 
1905;  Hubendick,  1951)  suggest  that  the  body  and  shell 
have  an  orientation  similar  to  those  of  P.  philiporum. 
Whether  a  pseudoconch  is  present  remains  unknown, 
although  Massy  (1932)  described  a  firm  membrane  sur- 
rounding the  viscera  in  her  specimens.  This  tissue  could 
be  the  epithelium  that  encloses  the  pseudoconch.  It  seems 
doubtful  that  the  shell  or  pseudoconch  of  P.  philiporum 
would  ever  survive  the  rigors  of  net  collection  or  routine 
fixation.  Both  structures  on  my  specimen  dissolved  within 
two  weeks  of  preservation.  A  similar  condition  could  be 
expected  for  P.  valdiviae. 

Tesch  (1948)  provided  the  most  complete  description 
of  what  he  considered  to  be  Procymbulia  valdiviae.  He 
found  it  so  similar  to  Peraclis  bispinosa  that  he  removed 
its  standing  as  a  genus  and  discounted  any  transitional 
status  it  displayed  between  the  Peraclididae  and  the 
Cymbuliidae.  However,  five  facts  suggest  that  the  spec- 
imens Tesch  used  to  make  his  determination  are  probably 
a  new  species  of  Peraclis  rather  than  specimens  of  P. 
valdiviae:  1)  the  shells  bear  distinct  PeraclisAiVe  rostra 
and  suture  ornamentation;  2)  the  shells  survived  net  col- 
lection and  years  of  preservation;  3)  only  his  specimens 
bear  an  operculum;  4)  Tesch  s  figures  show  a  Peraclis- 
like  90°  twisting  of  the  wingplate,  indicating  partial  re- 
traction into  the  shell.  Figures  of  P.  valdiviae  from  Mei- 
senheimer (1905),  Bonnevie  (1913),  Hubendick  (1951), 
and  my  preserved  specimen  of  P.  philiporum  all  have 
the  wingplate  situated  in  its  unretracted  position  (the 
proboscis  over  the  gonadal  whorl)  suggesting  Procym- 
bulia does  not  display  this  type  of  retraction.  And  finally, 
5)  Tesch  found  no  lateral  processes  bordering  the  median 
lobe  of  the  wingplate. 

Procymbulia  appears  to  be  cosmopolitan  in  its  distri- 
bution and  represented  by  at  least  two  species.  Based  on 
the  collections  of  Meisenheimer  (1905)  and  Massy  (1932), 
it  would  appear  that  P.  valdiviae  probably  occurs  in  the 
circumgiobal  .southern  oceans,  primarily  in  deep  water. 
As  stated  above,  Tesch "s  (1948)  Indo-Pacific  specimens 
most  likely  belong  to  a  new  species  of  Peraclis.  Bonnevies 
(1913)  description  of  P.  michaelsarsi  from  a  single  spec- 


imen collected  in  the  N.E.  Atlantic  may  be  very  similar 
to  P.  philiporum.  Based  on  her  brief  description,  the 
shape  of  the  gonadal  whorl  and  the  orientation  and  pig- 
mentation pattern  of  the  proboscis  resemble  P.  philipo- 
rum. Hubendick  (1951)  and  Tesch  (1946)  may  also  have 
collected  P.  philiporum,  since  all  of  these  Atlantic  spec- 
imens assigned  to  P.  valdiviae  lack  the  large  sensory 
processes  on  the  anterior  wingplate  margin  characteristic 
of  this  latter  species.  Hubendick  s  figures  closely  resemble 
my  preserved  specimen,  and  Tesch  (1946)  described  a 
similar  pigment  pattern  to  that  of  P.  philiporum  but 
indicated  that  an  operculum  was  attached  to  the  wing- 
plate of  his  specimens.  My  animal  shows  no  scar  or  other 
indication  of  ever  having  had  an  operculum.  Tesch's 
specimens  were  considerably  smaller  than  mine,  how- 
ever, and  the  operculum  may  be  lost  at  an  earh-  age. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  gratefully  thank  Dr.  G.  R.  Harbison  for  providing  sub- 
mersible time  and  support.  Dr.  Carol  M.  Lalli  and  two 
reviewers  for  comments  on  the  manuscript,  Paula  Mik- 
kelsen  and  Amelie  Sheltema  for  comments  on  the  ori- 
entation of  gastropods,  and  R.  Presley  for  help  in  manu- 
script preparation.  Research  supported  by  N.S.F.  grants 
OCE  85-16083,  OCE  87-46136,  OCE  87-01388  and  an 
in-house  grant  from  Harbor  Branch  Oceanographic  In- 
stitution, all  to  G.  R.  Harbison.  Support  for  the  color 
plates  was  provided  by  a  grant  from  Conchologists  of 
America  and  by  THE  NAUTILUS.  This  is  Harbor  Branch 
Oceanographic  Institution  Contribution  No.  793  and 
Direct  Studies  of  Mesopelagic  Communities  Contribu- 
tion No.  22. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bonnevie,  K.    1913.    Pteropoda  Report  of  the  "Michael  Sars" 

North  .'\tlantic  Deep  Sea  Expedition  3: 1-85. 
Gilmer,  R    W.  and  G  R.  Harbison.     1986     Morphology  and 

field  behavior  of  pteropod  molluscs:  feeding  methods  in 

the  families  Cavoliniidae,  Limacinidae  and  Peraclididae 

(Gastropoda:  Thecosomata).  Marine  Biology  91:47-57. 
Hubendick,  B.    1951.    Pteropoda,  witli  a  new  genus   Further 

Zoological  Results  of  the  Swedish  .Antarctic  Expetlition 

1901-1903  4(6):1-10. 
Lalli,  C    M    and  R.  W.  Gilmer.     1989.     Pelagic  snails    The 

biology  of  holoplanktonic  gastropod  mollusks.  Stanford 

University  Press,  259  p. 
Massy,  A.  L.    1932.    Mollusca:  Gastropoda  Thecosomata  and 

Gymnosomata.  Discovery  Reports  3:267-296. 
Meisenheimer,  J     1905.    Pteropoda.  Wissenschaftliche  ergeb- 

nisse  der  Deutschen  Tiefsee  Expedition  auf  dem  Dampfer 

••\aldivia"  1898-1899  9(1):1-314. 
Meisenheimer,  J      1906     Die  Ptero[)oden  der  deutschen  Siid- 

polar-Expedition  1901-1903.  Deutsche  Siidpolar-Expedi- 

tion  IX.  Zoologie  1:94-153 
Morton,  J.  E.     1964.     Locomotion    In.  \\  ilbui,  K    and  C.  M. 

^'onge  (eds).  Physiology  of  the  Mollusca.  Academic  Press, 

1 :383-423. 
Spoel,  S.  van  der.     1976.     Pseudothecosoinata,  Gv  nino,soinata 


R.  W.  Gilmer,  1990 


Page  119 


and  Heteropoda  (Gastropoda).  Bohn,  Scheltema,  and  Hol- 
kema,  Utrecht,  484  p 

Tesch,  J.  J.  1913.  Pteropoda.  In:  F.  E.  Scliulze  (ed.).  Das 
Tierreich.  R.  Friedlander  &  Sohn,  Berlin,  36;  1-154 

Tesch,  J.  J.  1946.  The  thecosomatous  pteropods.  I.  The  At- 
lantic. Dana  Reports  28:1-82. 


Tesch,  J  J  1948.  The  thecosomatous  pteropods.  11  The  Indo- 
Pacific.  Dana  Reports  30:1-45. 

Tietze,  R  C.  and  A.  M,  Clark.  1986.  Remotely  operated  tools 
for  undersea  vehicles.  In:  T.  McGuiness  (ed.).  Current 
practices  and  new  technology  in  ocean  engineering.  Amer- 
ican Society  of  Mechanical  Engineers  11:219-223. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(4):120-129,  1990 


Page  120 


Studies  on  Bathyal  and  Abyssal  Buccinidae 

(Gastropoda:  Neogastropoda): 

1.  Metula  fiisiformis  Clench  and  Aguayo,  1941 


M.  G.  Haraspwyrh 

Dt'parliiu'iil  ol  lii\frtcl)r;i(f  Zoology 
National  Museum  ol  X.ilural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington.  IX:  20560,  VS.\ 


ABSTRACT 

Based  on  the  morphology  of  the  radula  and  shell,  Metula  fii- 
sijorntis  Clench  &  .-Xguayo,  1941  is  transferred  to  the  pretlom- 
inantU  Inilo-western  Pacihc  genus  Wanario.  This  species  occurs 
in  upper  t-ontinental  slope  communities  (liS3-578  m)  of  the 
(.'arihhean  Sea  and  the  northern  coast  of  South  America.  The 
holotype  was  collected  dead  in  2,633  m,  well  below  the  depth 
inhabited  by  this  species.  The  large  well-developed  gland  of 
Leiblein,  a  separate  sperm  ingesting  gland  between  the  capsule 
gland  ami  albumin  gland,  and  three-cusped  rachidian  teeth  are 
features  that  Manaria  shares  with  other  fusiform  buccinids 
(e.fi,..  Penion.  Scrratifusti.s)  as  well  as  with  primitive  members 
of  other  families  within  Muricacea  These  features  are  inter- 
preted as  being  symplesiomorphic,  and  suggest  that  the  fusi- 
form buccinids  are  among  the  more  primitive  members  of  the 
Buccinidae. 

Key  Kurds:  Buccinidae;  Caribfiean;  bath\al;  Manaria:  Me- 
tula. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  family  BiKciiiidao  comprises  one  of  the  most  diverse 
arui  dominant  groups  of  predatory  prosobranch  gastro- 
pods at  high  latitudes  and  at  bathyal,  abyssal  and  hadal 
depths.  It  is  repre.sented  in  the  fossil  record  of  the  Lower 
Cretaceous  (Albiari),  and  ranks  among  the  oldest  of  the 
neogastropod  families  (Taylor  et  (il.,  1980),  Like  most 
predatory  prosobranch  families,  it  is  believed  to  have 
evolved  in  temperate  climatic  zones  at  higher  latitudes 
(Sohl,  1987).  .Although  the  majority  of  these  families  be- 
came predominantly  tropical  during  the  Onozoic,  most 
Buccinitlac  remained  in  temperate  and  polar  regions, 
were  the  family  diversified  since  the  late  Miocene  (Taylor 
et  al.,  1980).  The  success  of  Buccinidae  at  high  latitudes 
and  in  the  deep  .sea  has  been  attributed  to  their  broaii 
habitats  and  diets,  which  are  considered  to  be  adaptations 
to  unpredictable  resources  (Taylor,  1978). 

Despite  the  high  diversity  and  abundance  of  Buccin- 
idae, the  systematics  of  this  group  is  [loorly  imdcrstood 
at  all  laxonomic  levels.  This  is  due,  in  large  part,  to  the 


fact  that  the  vast  majority  of  taxa  are  based  exclusively 
on  features  of  the  shell  and  operculum,  supplemented 
occasionally  by  observations  on  radular  morphology. 
Shells  of  Buccinidae  tend  to  be  simple,  and  offer  few 
readily  discernible  morphological  characters.  These  are 
subject  to  convergence,  especially  in  polar  regions  and 
the  deep  sea,  where  effects  of  habitat  on  shell  form  are 
most  pronounced  (Graus,  1974). 

Detailed  anatomical  data  are  available  for  compara- 
tively few,  mainK  shallow-water  taxa  (e.g..  Dakin,  1912; 
Golikov.  1963,  1980;  Kosuge,  1967;  Ponder,  1973;  Lus, 
1981;  Kantor,  1990).  The  lack  of  well-defined,  synapo- 
morphic  anatomical  features  (other  than  radular  mor- 
phology), even  between  the  families  Buccinidae.  Nas- 
sariidae,  Fasciolariidae,  and  Melongenidae  have  led 
Ponder  (1973a)  to  suggest  these  groups  might  all  be  con- 
sidered subfamilies  of  Buccinidae.  This  arrangement  was 
subsequently  adopted  b\  Ponder  and  W'aren  (1988). 

Bouchet  and  Waren  (1985)  revised  the  deep-water 
Buccinidae  {sensu  Wenz,  1943)  of  the  northeastern  .At- 
lantic Ocean,  and  later  (Bouchet  &  Waren,  1986)  re- 
viewed many  of  the  tropical  deep-w  ater  si)ecies.  Despite 
the.se  significant  contributions,  most  of  the  nearly  200 
supraspecific  taxa  v\  ithin  Buccinidae  (sensu  Wenz,  1943) 
are  poorly  defined,  and  the  assignment  of  many  species 
to  genera  remain  tentative. 

■Among  the  taxa  listetl  In  Bouchet  and  Waren  (1986) 
as  ■insufficientb  known  is  Metula  Jusiformis  Clench 
and  .Aguayo,  1941.  The  placement  of  this  species  in  Met- 
ula was  disputed  by  Olsson  and  Ba\er  (1972)  who  sug- 
gested that  it  had  affinities  with  Fusinus  or  a  fusiform 
bui'ciiiid  .\l)bott  (1974)  referred  this  species  to  the  genus 
Bartschia.  Bouchet  and  Waren  (1986)  considered  it  to 
be  a  buccinid,  and  commented  on  its  conchological  re- 
semblance to  Euthriostoina. 

During  a  recent  dive  aboard  the  research  submersible 
Johnson-Sea-Link  I  off  Nava.ssa  Island,  situated  off  the 
southwestern  peninsula  of  Haiti,  the  author  had  the  op- 
portunity to  observe  and  collect  several  living  specimens 
of  "Mctnia"  fusifonnis.  These  observations,  together  with 
data  irom  ailditional  material  discovered  in  the  L'SNM 


M.  G.  Harasewvch,  1990 


Page  121 


collections,  form  the  basis  of  this  report,  the  first  in  a 
series  on  enigmatic  deep-water  buccinid  ta.xa. 

MATERI.ALS  AND  METHODS 

Five  specimens  of  "Metida  fiisiformis  Clench  anil 
Aguayo,  1941  were  observed,  recorded  on  videotape  and 
collected  either  in  (1  specimen)  or  within  2  meters  (4 
specimens)  of  a  bucket  baited  with  decomposing  octopus 
and  set  on  an  ooze-covered  area  (slope  about  20°)  off  the 
west  coast  of  Navassa  Island  (18°24'42"N,  75°03'00"W) 
at  a  depth  of  578  m  for  50  hours.  The  specimens,  which 
were  moribund  upon  reaching  the  surface,  were  fixed  in 
10%  neutral  buffered  formalin  and  stored  in  70%  ethanol 
until  dissection. 

Phenetic  analyses  were  used  to  assess  the  relationships 
of  three  conchologicaiiy  similar  taxa,  each  proposed  on 
the  basis  of  a  single  specimen.  All  specimens  listed  in  the 
"material  examined"  section,  as  well  as  the  holot\  pe  of 
Biiccinoftisus  suhnamensis  Okutani,  1982  and  two  spec- 
imens of  a  southern  variant  of  Biiccinutu  canetac  Clench 
and  Aguayo,  1944,  described  as  Plicifusus  jamarci  Oku- 
tani. 1982,  were  scored  for  the  11  shell  characters  listed 
in  table  1.  These  data  were  standardized  (mean  =  0, 
standard  deviation  =  1),  a  Euclidean  distance  matrix 
calculated,  and  a  phenogram  based  on  the  UPGMA  clus- 
tering algorithm  was  produced  using  SYSTAT  version 
4.0  (Wilkinson,  1988).  A  Principle  Component  Analysis 
using  the  same  data  matrix  (25  specimens  x  11  char- 
acters) was  performed,  also  using  SYSTAT,  and  the  in- 
dividuals plotted  using  the  first  two  principal  components 
as  axes. 

Repositories  of  examined  specimens  are  indicated  by 
the  following  abbreviations: 

MCZ — Museum  of  Comparative  Zoolog\ ,  Harvard  L  ni- 

versity 
NSMT — National  Science  Museum,  Tokyo 
USNM — National  Museum  of  Natural  Histor\,  Smith- 
sonian Institution 


SYSTEMATICS 

Family  Buccinidae  Rafinesque,  1815 
Genus  Manaria  E.  A.  Smith,  1906 

Manaria  fiisiformis  (Clench  &  Aguayo,  1941) 
(figures  1-5,  7-17) 

Metula  fiisiformis  Clench  &  .\gua\o,  1941:179,  pi.  1-4,  fig.  1; 

Bouchet  &  Waren,  1986:485,  fig.  116. 
"Metula"  fiisiformis  Clench  &  .\gua\o. — Olsson  &  Ra\or,  1972: 

925. 
Bartschia  fiisiformis  (C^lench  &  .\gua\o). — .-VIjIjoU,  1974:217. 
Mohniu  kaichcrae  Petuch.  1987:103,  pi.  21,  figs.  8,  9. 

Shell  morphology:  Shell  (figures  1,  3,  4,  5)  to  69  mm, 
thick,  biconical,  fusiform,  Protoconch  badl\  eroded  or 
missing  on  all  adult  specimens  examined.  Protoconch  of 
juvenile  specimen  (figures  7,  8)  just  over  one  smooth 
whorl,  with  a  diameter  of  0.75  mm.  Transition  to  teleo- 


I'alilc  I.  Shell  iharacter.s  ii.scd  for  plii'iictic  analv.sLs  Cliar- 
.iclcrs  I  through  8  descrihe  the  gfoniclr\  ol  llu-  gfiicralized 
s\w\\  form  (Harasewvch.  1982). 


4 

5, 
6. 

I  . 

8. 

9. 

10, 


Shape  <il  the  generating  tiir\e  of  the  liod\  ea\it\  (She). 

Shape  ol  the  generating  curve  of  the  siphonal  canal  (Ssc). 

Helati\e  siplional  length  (Ksl), 

Siphonal  angle  (0), 

.\ngle  of  the  generating  curve  (6). 

Rate  of  «  horl  expansion  (W). 

Position  of  the  generating  cur\e  relati\e  to  the  axis  (D), 

Rate  of  whorl  translation  (T), 

Spire  angle  {a) 

.Nimiber  oi  axial  ribs  on  lourlh  leleoeimch  u  horl  (no   rib). 

Number  ol   spiral  eord.s  on  lourlh  teleoeoniii  whorl  mo, 

cord). 


conch  gradual,  marked  by  formation  of  axial  ribs,  fol- 
lowed within  V:  whorl  b\'  the  formation  of  six  fine  spiral 
cords.  Teleoconch  of  up  to  8%  convex  whorls,  rounded 
at  first,  becoming  sharply  shouldered  by  the  fifth  post- 
nuclear  whorl.  Suture  broadh  adpressed.  Axial  sculpture 
of  broad,  rounded,  regularh  -spaced,  axial  to  slightK  pro- 
socline  ribs  that  do  not  extend  onto  the  anteriormost 
portions  of  the  body  whorl  or  the  siphonal  canal.  Axial 
ribs  number  11-12  on  the  first  and  11-16  on  the  penul- 
timate whorl.  Spiral  sculpture  of  strong  cords,  as  broad 
or  broader  than  intervening  spaces,  that  overlay  axial 
ribs.  Cords  number  12-13  between  suture  and  shoulder, 
19-21  between  shoulder  and  siphonal  canal,  16-18  on 
siphonal  canal.  Sixteen  to  21  cords  remain  exposed  on 
penultimate  whorl.  .Aperture  elliptical,  tapering  poste- 
riorly beneath  suture  to  form  anal  sulcus.  Outer  lip  with 
18-23  thin  spiral  lirae  pronounced  beneath  axial  ribs  and 
weak  or  absent  between.  Inner  lip  smooth,  with  thin, 
porcellaneous  inductura.  Columella  solid,  sinuate,  lack- 
ing folds.  Siphonal  canal  broad,  slightK  shorter  than  ap- 
erture, crossing  coiling  axis.  Siphonal  fascicle  weak,  ad- 
jacent to  columellar  edge  of  siphon.  Exterior  surface  of 
shell  dull  ivory  to  light  amber,  aperture  and  columella 
white.  Periostracum  (figure  9)  thick,  straw-colored  to 
brown,  consisting  of  thin,  axial  blades  that  are  broadest 
between  spiral  cords  and  abraded  along  their  surfaces. 
Operculum  (figures  2,  13,  op)  thick,  elongate,  with  ter- 
minal nucleus  (usually  abraded),  attached  along  slightly 
less  that  V2  of  its  inner  surface,  glazed  along  posterior 
and  left  inner  margins,  fills  aperture  '4  w horl  from  outer 
lip. 

Shell  ultraslructure:  (figure  10)  Shell  composed  of  three 
layers  of  crossed-lamellar  crystals  and  an  outermost  pris- 
matic layer.  Innermost  layer  (—200  nm)  with  crxstal 
faces  oriented  at  approximately  a  35°  angle  to  growing 
edge  of  the  shell;  crystal  faces  of  next  layer  (  —  250  ^m) 
perpendicular  to  growing  edge;  outermost  crossed-la- 
mellar layer  (—625  ^m)  parallel  to  growing  edge.  Pris- 
matic layer  of  varying  thickness  (50-200  fim)  outermost, 
comprising  the  spiral  cords  and  contains  all  of  the  shell 
color.  Inner  three  lasers  white. 


Page  122 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


/\ 


*» 


^  V 


\ 


^. 


M.  G.  Harasewvch,  1990 


Page  123 


External  anatomy:  (figure  13)  Soft  tissues  comprise  3'/2- 
4  wliorls,  mantle  cavit)'  spans  %  whorl,  kidney  '/4  whorl, 
digestive  gland  2'/:-3  whorls.  Columellar  muscle  long, 
narrow,  attaching  to  shell  I'/s  whorl  behind  mantle  edge. 
Foot  small,  rectangular  (L/W  =  1.4)  with  thin,  deep 
propodial  groove  along  leading  edge  of  sole,  .\nimal  uni- 
form khaki  to  tan  in  color.  Head  small,  with  pair  of  thin, 
tapering  cephalic  tentacles  with  round  black  eyes  at  their 
bases.  Siphon  (figure  13,  s)  short,  muscular. 

Mantle  cavity:  Arrangement  of  mantle  cavity  organs 
similar  to  that  of  Bucciniiiii  iindatum  Linne,  1758  (Fret- 
ter  &  Graham,  1962:  fig.  180B).  Mantle  with  thick,  mus- 
cular band  (figure  13,  mb)  along  edge,  thin,  transparent 
posteriorly.  Osphradium  bipectinate,  large,  dark  brown, 
with  70-80  filaments  above  ganglion  and  62-68  below, 
Ctenidium,  twice  as  long  and  slightly  narrower  than 
osphradium,  sharply  tapered  along  anterior  edge.  Hy- 
pobranchial  gland  (figure  13,  hg)  broad,  thick,  viscous 
and  clear  in  water,  solid  and  opaque  in  alcohol. 

Alimentary  system:  Proboscis  (figure  14,  pb)  long  (1.5 
X  shell  aperture  length),  narrow  (1.2  mm),  pleurombolic, 
retracts  to  rear  of  cephalic  hemocoel,  overlying  salivary 
glands  anteriorly  and  gland  of  Leiblein  posteriorly.  Buc- 
cal mass,  as  long  as  introverted  proboscis,  with  radular 
sac  extending  slightly  from  its  posterior  margin.  Radula 
(figure  12)  short  (6.0-7.9  mm,  n  =  3),  composed  of  102- 
108  rows  of  teeth.  Rachidian  tooth  with  three  cusps  of 
equal  length  located  on  central  portion  of  broad,  basal 
plate.  Lateral  teeth  with  two  cusps,  outer  cusp  1.5  times 
as  long  and  broad  at  its  base  as  inner  cusp.  Salivary  glands 
(figure  14,  sg)  large,  irregular,  with  ducts  becoming  em- 
bedded in  wall  of  esophagus  (within  dorsal  folds)  anterior 
to  valve  of  Leiblein  (figure  14,  vl).  Gland  of  Leiblein 
(figure  14,  gl)  long,  convoluted,  posteriorly  tapering,  fill- 
ing posterior  %  of  cephalic  hemocoel,  emptying  via  a 
thin  duct  into  the  posterior  region  of  the  mid-esophagus. 
Stomach  (figures  13,  14,  sto)  simple,  U-shaped,  with  two 
widely  separated  ducts  to  digestive  glands.  Intestine  thin, 
tubular,  with  longitudinal  folds,  rectum  (figure  14,  r) 
little  expanded,  simple.  Anal  gland  absent. 

Female  reproductive  system:  A  narrow  oviduct  leads 
from  the  large  yellow-orange  ovary  to  the  albumen  gland, 
which  lies  along  the  anterior  right  wall  of  the  kidney. 
The  pallial  portion  of  the  female  gonoduct  (figure  15) 
consists  of  a  large  sperm  ingesting  gland  (figure  15,  ig), 
long,  narrow  capsule  gland  (figure  15,  eg)  and  a  muscular 
bursa  copulatrix  (figure  15,  be)  with  the  female  opening 
(figure  15,  fo)  situated  ventral  to  the  anus  (figure  15,  a). 

Male  reproductive  system:  Testis  (figures  13,  16,  te) 
orange  tan,  along  right  side  of  digestive  gland.  Testicular 


duct  (figure  16,  td)  tubular,  about  0.3  mm  in  diameter, 
becomes  convoluted  along  adaxial  wall  of  kidnev  to  form 
seminal  vesicle  (figure  16,  sv).  Duct  straightens  before 
passing  along  wall  of  pericardium  and  entering  rear  of 
mantle  cavit>  (figure  16,  rmc).  The  prostate  gland  (figure 
16,  pr)  is  narrow,  and  runs  along  the  right  wall  of  the 
mantle  cavity,  ventral  to  the  rectum.  The  tubular  vas 
deferens  (figure  16,  vd)  runs  from  the  prostate  gland 
anteriorly  along  the  floor  of  the  mantle  cavity  to  the  base 
of  the  penis  (figure  16,  pen),  which  is  approximately  Vt 
the  length  of  the  mantle  cavitv,  dorsoventrally  com- 
pressed, truncated,  and  with  a  terminal  papilla  (figure 
16,  pap)  emanating  from  a  depression  along  its  distal 
lateral  wall. 

Material  examined:  Holotype,  MCZ  135290,  Atlantis 
sta.  3344,  trawled  off  Cienfuegos,  Cuba  (2]°38'N, 
80°12'W),  in  1,440  fms  (2,633  m);  Holotype  of  Molmia 
haicherae  Petuch,  1987,  L'SNM  859855,  off  Los  Monges 
Islands,  off  mouth  of  Gulf  of  Venezuela,  Venezuela,  in 
200  m;  USNM  875112,  Johnson-Sea-Link  I  sta.  2321,  off 
west  coast  of  Navassa  Island  (18°24'42"N,  75°03'00"W), 
in  or  near  carrion-baited  bucket  left  in  570  m  for  50 
hours  [5  specimens];  USNM  854016,  Johnson-Sea-Link  I 
sta.  2320,  off  Lulu  Bay,  Navassa  Island  (18°22'42"N, 
75°02'44"W),  on  small  tree  branch  in  530  m  [2  juvenile 
specimens];  USNM  832953,  off  Long  Point,  south  shore 
of  St.  Croix,  US  Virgin  Islands,  in  160  fms  (293  m)  [10 
specimens];  USNM  832954,  off  Salt  River  Canyon,  north 
shore  St.  Croix,  US  Virgin  Islands,  in  230  fms  (420  m) 
[2  specimens];  USNM  811332,  R/V  Oregon  sta.  4225,  150 
miles  north  of  Sao  Luis,  Maranhao,  Brazil  (00°18'N, 
44°23"W),  in  100  fms  (183  m)  [1  empt>  shell]. 

Ecology:  Like  many  buccinids,  this  species  is  attracted 
to  carrion,  and  is  at  least  a  facultative  scavenger.  The 
five  specimens  of  Manaria  fusiformis  were  the  only  gas- 
tropods collected  in  or  near  the  baited  trap.  Also  present 
in  the  trap  were  several  dozen  isopods  (Booralana  tri- 
carinata  Camp  &  Heard,  1988).  The  two  juvenile  spec- 
imens were  collected  from  a  single  fragment  of  sunken 
wood  that  was  also  inhabited  by  three  chitons,  about  20 
skeneiform  trochids,  and  that  contained  teredinids  and 
burrowing  sipunculans.  Water  temperatures  at  the  two 
Johnson-Sea-Link  stations  at  w hich  this  species  was  col- 
lected were  9.7°  C  (JSL-I-2320)  and  9.9°  C  (JSL-I-2321). 
Gut  contents  of  three  adult  specimens  were  examined, 
but  did  not  reveal  identifiable  remains.  The  bathymetric 
range  of  all  live-collected  specimens  was  293-578  m. 

Geographic  range:  (figure  17)  This  species  is  presently 
known  only  from  the  northern  and  eastern  Caribbean 
Sea,  and  from  along  the  northern  coast  of  South  America. 


Figures  1-5.  Manaria  fuxiformis  (Clench  k  Aguayo,  1941),  I.  I'SNM  87,51  12,  j.Sl,-l  sta.  2321,  off  west  coast  of  Navassa  lslaii(f 
15  X.  2.  Operculum  of  specimen  in  figure  1.  3  0  x,  3.  Holotype  of  Mctnia  fusiformis  (,'leiicli  &  .Aguayo,  MCZ  135290,  Atlantis 
sta.  3344,  off  Cienfuegos,  C;uba  in  2,633  m.  1.5  x.  4.  USNM  811332.  150  miles  north  of  Sao  Luis,  Maranhao,  Brazil  in  183  m.  1.5 
X.  5.  Holotype  of  Muhnia  kaichcrae  Petuch.  1987,  USNM  8.59855.  off  Los  Monges  Islands,  off  mouth  of  Gulf  of  N'enezuela, 
Venezuela,  200  m.  1.5  x     Figure  6.    Buccinofussus  surinamensis  Okutani,  1982.  Holotype  NSMT  Mo  60028,  off  Surinam.  1.0  x. 


Page  124 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


Figures  7-12.  Metttla  fusiformis  Clench  &  Aguayo.  7.  A.xial  view  of  protocomli  of  juvenile  specimen  (USNM  85-1016).  Scale  bar 
=  200  ^in.  8.  Lateral  view  of  same  protoconch.  Scale  bar  =  200  ^m.  9.  Periostracum  Scale  bar  =  500  fim.  10.  Shell  iiltrastnicture, 
fracture  surface  parallel  to  growing  edge,  Vz  whorl  beliiiui  lip  Scale  bar  =  250  ^m  1  L  Radular  ribbon  of  juvenile  specimen  (USNM 
85-1016),  lateral  teeth  removed  from  right  side.  Scale  bar  =  5  ^m  '2.  Hadular  riblxm  of  adult  specimen  (specimen  in  figure  1). 
Scale  bar  =  100  ^m. 


M.  G.  Harasewych,  1990 


Page  125 


Figures  13-16.  Anatomical  features  of  Manaria  fusiformis  (C;lencli  and  Aguayo),  I.'J.  Male  speeimen,  lateral  view.  IJ-.  Alimentary 
system.  15.  Female  reproductive  system.  16.  Male  reproductive  system,  a,  anus;  aa,  anterior  aorta;  be,  bursa  copulatrix;  eg,  capsule 
gland;  cm,  columellar  muscle;  dg,  digestive  gland;  fo,  female  opening;  gl,  gland  of  Leiblein;  hg.  liypobranchial  gland;  ig,  ingesting 
gland;  k,  kidney;  nib,  muscular  band  of  mantle;  ng,  nephridial  gland;  nr,  nerve  ring;  op,  operculum;  pap,  papilla;  pb.  proboscis; 
pc,  pericardium;  pen,  penis;  pro,  prostate  gland;  r,  rectum;  s,  sipfion;  sg,  salivary  gland;  sto,  stomach;  sv,  seminal  vesicle;  td,  testicular 
duct;  te,  testes;  vd,  vas  deferens;  vl,  valve  of  Leiblein. 


Page  126 


THE  NAUTILUS.  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


Figure  1 7.  Geographic  distribution  of  Metula  fusijvrmis.  Sol- 
id star  denotes  type  locality  Open  star  denotes  type  locality  of 
Mohnia  kaicherae. 


DISCUSSION 

.\lthmigh  originally  described  in  the  genus  Metula,  the 
generic  placement  of  M.  fusiformis  Clench  and  Aguayo, 
1941  has  undergone  considerable,  if  speculative,  pere- 
grination during  the  intervening  decades.  The  radula  of 
this  species,  with  three-cusped  rachidian  teeth  and  two- 
cusped  lateral  teeth  (figures  11,  12),  differs  from  that  of 
Metula  H.  and  A.  Adams,  1853  (Bouchet,  1988:  fig.  1), 
and  precludes  the  suggested  affinities  with  Fusinus  or 
any  fasciolariid  (Olsson  &  Bayer,  1972:925),  or  with  Eu- 
thriostoma  (Bouchet  &  Waren,  1986:485).  This  radula 
most  closely  resembles  those  of  species  in  the  genera 
Eosipho  Thiele,  1929  and  Manaria  Smith,  1906  (Bouchet 
&  Waren,  1986:  figs.  13-17,  19-24).  Ontogenetic  changes 
in  the  morphology  of  the  rachidian  tooth  of  M.  fusifor- 
mis include  the  broadening  and  lateral  expansion  of  the 
basal  plate,  as  well  as  the  thickening  and  redirection  of 
the  cusps  to  a  parallel  orientation  (figures  11,  12).  Similar 
ontogenetic  changes  in  Manaria  lirala  Kuroda  and  Habe, 
1961  have  been  illustrated  (Bouchet  &  Waren,  1985:  figs. 
20,  23).  The  presence  of  pronounced  axial  ribs  overlaid 
by  thick  spiral  cords,  a  spire  that  is  more  than  half  the 
shell  length,  and  a  well  differentiated  siphonal  canal  in 
M.  fusiformis,  in  Manaria  thurstoni  Smith,  1906  (the 
type  species  of  Manaria),  and  in  several  Japanese  species 
of  Manaria,  as  well  as  the  lack  of  these  features  in  Eosi- 
pho smithi  (the  type  species  of  Eosipho)  support  the 
transfer  of  Metula  fusiformis  to  the  genus  Manaria. 

A  UPGVIA  phenogram  (figure  18)  of  the  21  available 
specimens  (including  the  holotype)  of  Manaria  fusifor- 
mis, the  holotypes  of  Burcinofusus  surinamensis  Oku- 
tani,  1982  and  Mohnia  kaicherae  Peluch,  1987,  as  well 
as  two  specimens  of  Buccinuni  canetae  (jamarci  form), 
together  with  a  plot  of  scores  of  the  first  two  principal 
components  for  these  specimens  (figure  19)  indicate  that 
the  holotype  of  Mohnia  kaicherae  falls  within  the  range 
of  variation  of  Manaria  fusiformis.  This  holotspe  (figure 
5,  18K,  19K),  which  has  six  teleoconch  whorls,  is  inter- 
mediate in  morphology  between  the  two  juvenile  spec- 
imens of  Manaria  fusiformis  (figures  18e,  19e),  which 


J 
J 

s 

a 
c 
a 
c 
d 
a 
b 
F 
b 
b 
a 
a 
a 
a 
b 
a 
a 
a 
b 
K 
e 
e 


3  2  10 

Figure  18.  Phenogram  of  UPGMA  clustering  of  Euclidean 
distances  using  standardized  data.  a-e.  Manaria  fusiformis.  a. 
I'SNM  83295.3,  .St.  Ooix  [10  specimens],  b.  USNM  875112, 
Navassa  [5  specimens],  c.  I'SNM  832954.  St.  Croix  [2  speci- 
mens] d.  USNM  811.3.32,  Brazil,  e.  LSXM  854016,  Navassa  [2 
jineiiile  specimens).  F.  Holot)  pe  of  Metula  fusiformis  C^lench 
&  .\gua\o  j.  Soutliern  variant  ol  Buccinnm  canetae  described 
as  Plicifusus  jamarci.  K.  Holotype  of  Mohnia  kaicherae  Pe- 
tnch.  S.  Holotype  of  Buccinofti.sus  surinamensis  Okntani. 


have  3.8  and  4()  teleoconch  whorls,  ami  the  remaining 
adult  specimens  (figures  18,  I9a-d).  \\  liich  ha\(>  between 
8.0  and  8.75  whorls.  Thus,  Manaria  fusiformis  can  be 
seen  to  undergo  allometric  grow  th  in  shell  and  radular 
form. 

The  lu)lot\  pe  of  Buccinofusus  surinamensis  Okutani, 


M.  G.  Harasewvch,  1990 


Page  127 


Table  2.  Survey  of  the  subfamilies  of  Buccinidae  (according  to  Ponder  &  Waren,  1988)  for  morphologies  of  the  glariH  ot  Leiblein 
(gLi.  sperm  ingesting  gland  (ig),  and  number  of  cusps  on  rachidian  teeth  (rach),  gL:  0  =  absent,  1  =  reduced,  flaccid;  2  =  large, 
glandular,  ig:  +  =  present;  —  =  alKent;  ''  =  unknown. 


Buccinidae 

Manaria  fiisijormis  (herein) 

Penion  (Ponder,  1973) 

Scrratijiisus  (Harase«\ch,  1990) 

Bucciniim  uiulatum  (Dakin,  1912;  Fretter,  1941) 

Neptunea  (Golikov,  1963) 

Retifttsus  tenuis  (Kosuge,  1967) 

Tacita  arnoldi  (Lus,  1981) 

Volutopsius  (Kantor,  1990) 

Thalassoplancs  moerchi  (Lus,  1973) 

Nassariinae 

Illyanassa  obsolcta  (Brown,  1969;  Fretter,  1941) 

Melongeninae 

Busycon  carica  (Harasewvch,  1982a) 
Mclongcna  corona  (Harasewvch.  1982a) 

Fasciolariinae 

Leucozonia  nassa  (Marcus  &  Marcus,  1962) 
Microfulgur  carinatits  (Ponder,  1970) 


+ 
+ 
+ 
+ 

+ 
? 
? 
? 


3 

3 

3 
>3 
2,  3,  >3 

3 

4 
1,3,  >3 

1 

>5 

4-8 
3 


+ 


1982,  a  species  synonymized  with  A/,  jusiformis  bv 
Bouchet  and  Waren  (1986:485),  is  more  similar  in  shell 
morphology  to  Plicifusus  jamarci  Okutaiii,  19S2  than  to 
any  specimens  of  A/,  jimjonnis.  and  is  therefore  re- 
moved from  the  s\  nonvmy  of  A/.  Jusiformis.  In  addition 
to  being  separable  on  the  basis  of  the  continuous  char- 
acters listed  in  table  1,  both  Buccinofusus  surinamensis 
and  P.  jamarci  differ  from  Manaria  jusiformis  in  having 
a  substantially  larger,  chalky,  white  shell  with  deeply 
receding  spiral  lirae  along  the  outer  lip  of  the  aperture. 
The  presence  of  a  large,  well-developed  gland  of  Leib- 
lein, simple,  three-cusped  rachidian  teeth,  and  a  female 
reproducti\e  svstem  with  a  distinct  sperm  ingesting  gland 
between  the  albumen  gland  and  the  capsule  gland  in 
Manaria  (herein),  Penion  (Ponder,  1973),  and  Serrati- 
fusiis  (Harasewych,  1990),  represents  a  combination  of 


characters  uncommon  within  Buccinidae  (table  2).  Each 
of  these  features  occurs  widely  throughout  the  Muricoi- 
dea  (table  3),  suggesting  that  these  are  plesiomorphic 
characters,  and  that  the  fusiform  buccinids  are  among 
the  more  primitive  members  of  the  family  Buccinidae. 
Finally,  it  is  suggested  that  the  depth  at  which  the 
holotv  pe  of  M.  fusiformis  was  collected  (2,633  m)  falls 
outside  the  batlnmetric  range  of  the  species,  and  rep- 
resents post-mortem  transport  of  the  shell  into  greater 
depths.  All  living  specimens  of  Manaria  fusiformis  were 
taken  between  183  m  and  578  m,  indicating  that  this 
species  is  a  member  of  upper  slope  communities.  Batln- 
metric zonation  along  the  continental  slope  has  been  w  ell 
documented  (e.g.,  Okutani,  1968),  and  bathv  metric  ranges 
of  species  have  been  found  to  be  narrower  on  the  upper 
slope  than  on  the  middle  slope  (Hecker,  1990). 


Table  3.  Sur\ev  of  the  tainilies  of  Muricoidea  (according  to  Ponder  &  Waren,  1988)  for  morphologies  of  the  gland  of  Leiblein 
(gL),  sperm  ingesting  gland  (ig),  and  number  of  cusps  on  rachidian  teeth  (rach),  gL:  0  =  absent,  1  =  reduced  or  modihed;  2  =  large, 
glandular,  ig;  -I-  =  present;  —  =  absent  Reported  features  are  present  in  some,  but  not  necessariK  in  all.  members  of  the  listed 
families. 


kI. 


Ig 


Muricidae  (Houston,  1976;  Harasewych,  1984) 

Turbinellidae  (Harasewych,  1987) 

Buccinidae 

Columbellidae  (Marcus  &  .Marcus,  1962a;  Houston,  1976) 

Volutidae  (Ponder,  1970a) 

Olividae  (Marcus  &  Marcus,  1959;  Ponder  &  Darragh,  1975) 

Harpidae  (Bergh,  1901) 

Marginellidae  (Ponder,  1970b) 

Mitridae  (Ponder,  1972,  197:3a) 

X'olutomitridae  (Ponder,  1972,  1973a) 

Costellariidae  (Ponder.  1972.  I97.3a) 


2 

+ 

3  major  +  minor 

2 

+ 
see  table  2 

3 

1 

- 

0 

2 

-1- 

3 

2 

-1- 

3 

0 

-1- 

3 

1 

+ 

1-20-1- 

0 

+ 

3  or  more 

1 

+ 

1 

2 

+ 

3  or  more 

Page  128 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


-r 

-2-1  0  1  2 

Figure  19.     Plot  of  scores  of  first  two  principal  components, 
.abbreviations  as  in  figure  18. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The  invaluabie  assistance  of  the  crews  of  the  Johnson- 
Sea-Link  1  submersible  and  the  R/V  Edwin  Link  is  grate- 
fulK  acknowledged.  1  thank  Kathcrine  Jones  for  pre- 
paring the  anatomical  illustrations,  and  Susanne  Bradon 
for  assistance  with  Scanning  Electron  Microscopy.  Drs. 
Philippe  Bouchet,  Museum  national  d'Histoire  natu- 
relle,  Paris,  Winston  F.  Ponder,  Australian  Museum,  Syd- 
ney, and  Anders  Waren.  Swedish  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  Stockholm,  provided  valuable  comments  on  the 
manuscript.  This  is  contribution  number  250  of  the 
Smithsonian  Marine  Station  at  Link  Port,  and  contri- 
bution number  810  of  the  Harbor  Branch  Oceanographic 
Institution. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

.-Vbbott,  K.  T.  1974.  .American  seashells,  2nd  ed.  van  Noslrand 
Heinhold  Co.,  New  York,  66.3  p.,  24  pis. 

Bergh,  H  1901  Beitrag  zur  Kemitniss  der  Ciatliiiig  Harpa. 
Zoologi.sclie  Jahrbiicher  14(4):609-629,  pi.  47, 

Bouchet,  P.  1988.  Two  new  species  of  Metula  (Gastropoda; 
Buecinidae)  with  a  description  of  the  radula  i}|  the  genus 
Tfie  .Nautilus  102(4):  149-1.5.1 

Bouchet,  P.  and  .V  Waren.  198,5.  Revision  ot  the  northeast 
.Mlantic  bathyal  and  abyssal  Neogaslropoda  excluding 
Turridae  (Molhisca.  Gastropoda),  Bollettitid  Malacologico. 
Suppleniento  1:121-296 

Bouchet,  P.  and  A.  Waren.  1986.  Molhisca  Gastropoda:  tax- 
onomical  notes  on  tropical  deep  water  Buecinidae  with 
descriptions  of  new  taxa.  Memoires  du  Museum  national 
d'Histoire  natureile.  Paris  (A)  1334.57-499,  pis.  1-18. 

Brown,  S.  C^  1969  The  structure  and  function  of  the  digestive 
system  of  the  mud  snail  Sassariiis  ohsolcttis  (Sav),  Malaco- 
logia  9(2):447-500. 

Clench,  W.  J  and  C.  G.  Aguayo.  1941.  Notes  and  descriptions 
of  a  new  deep-water  Molhisca  obtained  by  the  Harvard- 
Havana  expedition  off  the  coast  of  Cuba,  4.  Memorias  de 


la  Sociedad  ile  Historia  Natural  "Felipe  Poey  '  15:177- 
181, 

Dakin,  W,  J  1912  Buccinum.  (The  whelk)  Proceedings  and 
Transactions  of  the  Biological  Societv,  Liverpool  26:253- 
367. 

Fretter,  V.  1941.  The  genital  ducts  ol  some  British  stenoglo.s- 
san  prosobranchs.  Journal  ot  the  Marine  Biological  \ss,o- 
ciation  of  the  L'nited  Kingdom  25:173-211, 

Fretter,  V,  and  A.  Graham,  1962,  British  prosobranch  mol- 
luscs, Ray  Society,  London,  7.55  p, 

CJolikov,  .\.  N.  1963.  Gastropod  mollusks  of  the  genus  .Vcp- 
lunea  Bolten.  Fauna  of  the  USSR,  mollusks  5(1),  .\ka- 
demia  Nauk.  Leningrad,  219  p 

Golikov,  A.  N.  1980.  Buecinidae  of  the  World  Ocean.  Fauna 
of  the  USSR,  mollusks  5(2).  Akademia  Nauk,  Leningrad, 
508  p. 

Graus,  R.  R,  1974,  Latitudinal  trends  in  the  shell  character- 
istics of  marine  gastropods,  Lethaia  7.303-314, 

1  larasew\ch,  M,  G,  1982  Mathematical  modeling  of  the  shells 
of  higher  prosobranchs.  The  Bulletin  of  the  .\merican  Mal- 
acological  L  nion  1981:6-10. 

Harasewych,  M.  G.  1982a.  The  evolution  and  zoogeograph) 
of  the  subfamily  Busyconinae  (Gastropoda:  Melongeni- 
dae).  Ph.D.  dissertation.  University  of  Delaware,  216  p. 

Harasewych,  M.  G.  1984.  Comparative  anatomy  of  four  prim- 
itive muricacean  gastropods:  implications  for  trophonine 
plnlogen\-.  .American  Malacological  Bulletin  3(1):  11 -26. 

Harasew)  ch,  M,  G,  1987,  A  revision  of  the  genus  Benthovolu- 
ta  with  notes  on  the  evolution  of  the  subfamiK  Pt\cha- 
tractinae  (Prosobranchia:  Turbinellidae).  The  Nautilus 
101(4):166-181. 

Harasewych,  M.  G.  1990.  The  columbariform  ga.stropods  of 
New  Caledonia.  Memoires  du  Museum  national  d  Histoire 
natureile,  Paris,  (A).  In  press. 

Hecker,  B.  1990.  N'ariation  in  megafaunal  assemblages  on  the 
continental  margin  south  of  New  England.  Deep-Sea  Re- 
search 37(l):37-57, 

Houston,  R,  1976,  The  structure  and  function  of  neogastropod 
reproductive  systems:  witli  special  reference  to  Colutn- 
bella  fitscata  Sowerby,  1832.  The  Veliger  19(l):27-46. 

Kantor,  Yu.  I.  1990.  Gastropods  of  the  subfamily  V'olutopsi- 
inae  of  the  World  Ocean.  Nauka,  Moscow,  180  p.,  16  pis. 

Kosuge.  S.  1967.  On  the  transfer  of  " Phtiuwrhychus?"  tenuis 
Okutani,  1966  to  the  famiK  Buecinidae.  \'enus  25(2):59- 
64,  pis.  3,  4, 

Lus,  V.  Y'a.  1973.  A  new  fasciolariid  iMollusca,  Xeogastropo- 
da)  from  the  lower  abyssal  region  of  the  north  Pacific. 
Transactions  of  the  Institute  of  Oceanographv,  Academy 
of  Sciences,  USSR  91:203-212. 

Lus,  \'  Y'a.  1981.  A  new  species  of  Tacita  (Prosobranchia. 
Buecinidae)  with  wide  distribution  in  the  north-western 
part  of  the  Pacific  Ocean.  Transactions  of  the  Institute  of 
Oceanolog),  Academ\  of  Sciences.  L'SSR  115:140-154 

Marcus.  E,  and  F,  Marcus,  1959,  Studies  on  "Olividae",  Bole- 
tim  Faculdade  de  Filosofia,  Cieneias  e  Letras.  I'niversi- 
dade  de  Sao  Paulo  no,  232,  Zoologia  no.  22:99-188,  pis. 
1-11 

Marcus,  E  and  1'  Marcus  1962  On  Leitcozonia  nassa .  Tio\e- 
tim  Faculdade  de  I'ilosofia,  Cieneias  e  Letras,  Universi- 
dade  de  Sao  Paulo  no   261.  Zoologia  no.  24:ll-.39. 

Marcus,  F  and  F.  Marcus,  1962a,  Studies  on  Columbellidae 
Boletim  Faculdade  de  Filosofia.  Cieneias  e  Letras,  Uni\er- 
sidade  de  Sao  Paulo  no.  261,  Zoologia  no   24:3.35-4()2 

Okutani,  T.  1968  S\stemalics,  ecological  distribution,  and 
palaeoecological  implications  ol  arcliibenllial  and  ainssal 


M.  G.  Harasewvch,  1990 


Page  129 


inollusca  from  Sagaini  Ba\  and  adjacent  areas.  Jonrnal  ol 
the  P'acultv  of  Science,  Tok\o  University  (section  2,  Ge- 
ology) 17:1-98. 

Okutani,  T.  1982.  A  new  genus  and  five  new  species  of  gas- 
tropods trawled  off  Surinam.  \'enus  41(2):109-120. 

Olsson,  A.  .\.  and  F.  M  Bayer.  1972.  American  metulas  (Gas- 
tropoda: Buccinidae).  Bulletin  of  Marine  Science  22(4): 
900-925. 

Petucli,  E.  J.  1987.  New  Caribliean  molluscan  launas.  CERF, 
Charlottesville,  \A.  1.54  -t-  A4  p. 

Ponder,  W.  F.  1970.  A  new  archibenthal  species  of  Fasciola- 
riidae  from  New  Zealand,  Journal  of  the  Malacological 
Society  of  Australia  2(l):l-5. 

Ponder,  W.  F.  1970a.  The  morphology  of  Alcithoc  arahka 
(Gastropoda:  Volutidae).  Malacological  Review  3: 127- 165. 

Ponder,  W.  F.  1970b.  Some  aspects  of  the  morphology  of 
four  species  of  the  neogastropod  famiK  Marginellidae  w  itli 
a  discussion  of  the  evolution  of  the  toxoglossan  poison 
gland.  Journal  of  the  Malacological  Societ\  of  .Australia 
2(1):55-81. 

Ponder,  W.  F.  1972.  The  morphology  of  some  mitriforni 
gastropods  with  special  reference  to  their  alimentar\  and 
reproductive  systems  (Neogastropoda).  Malacologia  11(2): 
295-342. 

Ponder,  W.  F,  1973.  .A  re\ie\\  of  the  .\ustralian  species  of 
Penion  Fischer  (Neogastropoda:  Buccinidae).  Journal  of 
the  Malacological  Societx  of  Australia  2(4)401-428 

Pontler,  W.  F.     1973a     The  origin  anil  evolution  of  the  Neo- 


gastropoda. Malacologia  12(2):295-338. 

Ponder.  VV.  F.  and  T.  A.  Darragh.  1975.  The  genus  Zcniira 
H.  and  A.  Adams  (Mollusca:  Neogastropoda).  Journal  of 
the  Malacological  Society  of  Australia  3(2):S9-I09. 

Ponder,  W.  F.  and  A.  Waren.  1988  Cla.ssification  of  the 
Caenogastropoda  and  Heterostropha — a  list  of  the  family- 
group  names  and  higher  ta.xa  In:  Ponder,  W.  F.  (ed.). 
Prosobranch  phvl(igen\:  proceedings  of  a  svmposium  held 
at  the  9th  International  Malacological  Congress.  Edin- 
burgh, 1986.  Malacological  Re\iew,  Supplement  4:288- 
328. 

Sohl,  N.  F,  1987.  Oetaceous  gastropods:  contrasts  between 
Tethys  and  the  temperate  provinces  Journal  of  Paleon- 
tology 61(6):1085-1111. 

Taylor,  J.  D.  1978.  The  diet  of  Bucciiunn  iindutuni  and 
Ncptunea  antiqua  (Gastropoda:  Buccinidae)  Journal  of 
ConchologN,  London  29(6):309-318 

Taylor.  J.  D.,  N.  J.  Morris,  and  C.  N.  Taylor  1980,  Food 
specialization  and  the  evolution  of  predatorv  prosobranch 
gastropods.  Palaeontolog)  23(2):375-409, 

Thiele,  J  1929  Handbuch  der  systematischen  Weichlier- 
kunde,  Gustav  Fischer,  Jena  l(l):l-376. 

Wenz,  W.  1941-1943.  Gastropoda.  In:  Schidewolf.  O  H 
(ed  )  Handbuch  der  Palaozoologie  Band  6.  Gebriider 
Brontraeger,  Berlin,  Teil  5,  6:961-1506. 

V\  ilkinson,  L.  1988.  SYSTAT:  the  system  for  statistics.  SYS- 
TAT,  Inc.,  Evanston,  IL. 


THE  NAUTILUS  104(4):130-144,  1990 


Page  130 


BeUascintilla  parmaleeana  New  Genus  and  Species  from  the 
Tropical  Eastern  Pacific,  with  a  Review  of  the  Other, 
Ventrally  Notched  Galeommatid  Genera 
(Bivalvia:  Galeommatacea) 


C.  Cliflon  Coney 

Los  Angeles  (,'ounty  Museum  of  Natural  History 
900  Exposition  Boulevaril 
Los  Angeles,  C:A  90007,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

BeUascintilla  parnuikcdna.  new  genus  and  species,  is  de.seribetl 
from  tlie  tropical  eastern  Pacific.  It  differs  from  nivariscintilla 
riiaoria  Powell,  1932,  in  the  morpholog)'  of  the  cardinal  teeth, 
as  well  as  the  internal  crenulation  of  the  ventral  margin  of  the 
valves,  prominent  exterior  radiating  sulcus,  sculpture  of  corn- 
marginal  striae,  and  in  shell  ultra.structure. 

Four  other  ventralK  notched  galeommatids  are  redescribed 
on  the  basis  of  shell  characters  and  shell  ultrastructure:  Vas- 
coniella  jeffreysiana  (F'ischer,  I<S73),  from  the  northeastern 
Atlantic,  Divariscinlilla  rnaoria  Powell,  1932,  from  New  Zea- 
land, Tryphonitjax  lepidojornm  Olsson,  196L  and  T.  mexi- 
cantts  (Berr\,  1959)  from  the  tropical  eastern  Pacific,  The  gen- 
eral shell  characters  of  the  latter  two  species  indicate  these  to 
be  more  closely  allied  with  Caleomma. 

Divariscinlilla  yoyo  Mikkelsen  and  Bieler,  1989,  and  D.  trog- 
lodytes Mikkelsen  and  Bieler,  1989,  lack  a  ventral  notch  and 
are  reassigned  to  the  genus  Phhjctaenachlamys  Popham,  1939, 
based  on  shared  characters  of  internal  shell  and  morphology 
of  shell,  hinge,  ligament,  mantle,  and  ctenidia;  however,  the 
"flower-like  organ"  has  not  been  reporleil  in  Phlyctaciuichlinn- 
i/.s. 

.^('1/  words:  ventrally  nolthed  galeonunatids;  s\slematics; 
anatomy;  shell  ultrastructure;  Phlyctacnachlamys. 


INTRODUCTION 

Galeommatid  bivalves  are  small  and  easily  overlooked, 
particularly  because  the  living  animals  are  often  com- 
mensal with  other  kinds  of  animals,  such  as  living  at- 
tached to  the  walls  of  stomatopod  burrows.  Stomatopod 
burrows  have  not  been  adequately  sampled  for  associated 
species  of  Mollusca.  galeommatid  shells,  however,  are 
reasonably  well  represented  in  museum  collections  and 
have  morphological  characters  that  enable  the  deHnition 
of  genera  and  species  based  on  shell  characters  alone. 
One  group  of  galeommatids  has  tlie  slicll  ventrally  notched 
in  one  or  both  valves.  Until  now  the  number  of  species 


known  with  this  feature  is  four,  and  a  total  of  three 
generic  taxa  have  been  introduced  to  accommodate  them. 

The  objective  here  is  to  describe  a  new  monotypic 
genus  and  species  that  is  broadly  distributed  throughout 
the  Panainic  Province.  This  necessitated  comparison  \\  ith 
other  ventrally  notched  galeommatids  from  the  same 
faunal  region  and  other  regions  of  the  world.  The  total 
number  of  taxa  is  sufficiently  small  to  enable  a  full  review 
of  all  species. 

I  have  included  descriptions  of  shell  ultrastructure  in 
addition  to  the  conventional  shell  characters,  providing 
an  additional  character  set.  The  information  derived  from 
shell  ultrastructure  provides  finer  distinctions  in  support 
ol  the  classification  adopted  here. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

Specimens  of  Vasconiclla  jeffreysiana.  Divariscintilla 
maoria,  Tryphomyax  Icpidoformis,  T.  rnexicaniis  and 
of  BeUascintilla  parmaleeana  (LACM  paratypes  2447 
and  2448),  were  inounted  on  stubs,  gold  coated  and  ex- 
amined with  a  Cambridge  360  scanning  electron  micro- 
scope (SEM)  set  at  20  kilovolts  and  a  working  distance 
of  10  mm.  The  holotvpe  of  B.  parmaleeana  (LACM 
2446)  was  examined  uncoated  with  SEM  set  at  2  kilovolts 
and  a  working  distance  of  6  mm. 

Onl\'  a  single  \al\e  of  each  genus  was  examined  for 
shell  ultrastructure  because  the  ventrally  notched  gal- 
eommatid species  are  rare  and  few  speciinens  are  avail- 
able for  study.  Examination  of  shell  ultrastructure  was 
conducted  on  adult  valves  that  w  ere  broken  radialK  from 
hinge  line  to  ventral  edge.  It  was  generalK  possible  to 
follow  each  of  the  shell  layers  described  from  umbo  to 
ventral  margin.  Individual  shell  lavers  were  observed  at 
magnihcations  of  .5,000  x  and  10,000  x.  Photomicro- 
graphs were  made  in  the  central  region  of  the  shell  that 
contained  all  the  shell  lavers.  Measurements  of  shell 
thickne,ss  were  made  in  the  central  region  of  the  shell. 


C.  C.  Coney,  1990 


Page  131 


Table  1.    Comparison  of  sliell  characters  of  Vasconiella.  Dicariscintilla.  Tryplmmuux.  and  Bcllasciiitilla 


(.liaraclcr 

Vaudiiiclla 

Dirarixciiililla 

Tiiipli 

iiniyax 

Bc'llasrintilla 

Ventral  notch 

Ijresent  on  rig 

ht  \alve 

present  on 

both 

valves 

present  on 

both 

val 

ves 

present  on  both  \alves 

Valve  congruence 

grcatK  inequivalve 

eriui\alve 

equivalve 

slightlv  inequivalve 

Exterior  sculpture 

right  smooth. 

left  with 

smooth 

cancellate 

commarginal  striae 

commarginal  striae 

Nnd-\aKc  sculpture 

two  radiating 

rilis  fused 

radiating  ri 

b 

radiating  ri 

lb  bonne 

1  In 

two  radiating  ribs 

In  suture 

sulci 

fused  bv  suture 

Interior  sculpture 

fine  rihlets  on 

margm 

niinuti'K  granul 

ate 

radiating  ri 

lbs 

crenulate  margin 

Position  ot  beak  6; 

central 

anterior 

central 

anterior 

cardinals 

Cardinals  t\pe 

tubercular 

tubert'ular 

tubercular 

cuniform 

no.  left 

.■> 

I) 

2 

■^ 

no.  right 

1 

1 

1-2* 

2 

Laterals 

no.  left 

1 

1 

1 

1 

no.  right 

1 

0 

1-2* 

2 

Adductor 

unknow  n 

unknown 

unknouii 

isomvarian 

Ligament 

unknown 

amphidetic 

resilium 

resilium 

■  Bcflects  a  species  level  diHercntiati 


using  a  vertical  point-to-point  feature.  Characterization 
of  inclividual  la\ers  of  siiell  ultrastructure  follows  stan- 
dards defined  b\  Charter  and  Clark  (1985).  Shell  dimen- 
sions were  measured  using  a  Zeiss  zoom  stereomicroscope 
with  optical  reticle. 

For  consistency,  revised  descriptions  are  given  for  each 
species. 

The  following  institutional  abbreviations  are  used: 
ANSP,  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia; 
CAS,  California  Academy  of  Science;  LACM,  Los  An- 
geles Count}'  Museum  of  Natural  History;  NMNZ,  Na- 
tional Museum  of  New  Zealand;  SDNHM,  San  Diego 
Natural  History  Museum;  SMNH,  Swedish  Museum  of 
Natural  History;  I'SNM,  National  Museum  of  Natural 
History. 

SYSTEMATICS 

Bivalvia  Linnaeus,  1758 

Heterodonta  Neumayr,  1884 

Veneroida  H.  &  A.  Adams,  1856 

Galeommatacea  Gra\,  1840 

Galeommatidae  Gray,  1840 

[=  Galeomatidae  Nordsieck,  1969] 

[=  N'asconiellidae  Scarlato  and  Starobogatov,  1979] 

Chavan  (1969)  treated  the  family  Galeommatidae  with- 
out subfamilial  division,  recognizing  24  genera  (five  of 
these  questionably,  with  four  others  pronounced  genera 
dubia).  and  10  subgenera.  Of  these,  only  three  genera 
possess  a  ventral  notch  at  mid-valve  position  in  one,  or 
more  commonly,  both  valves. 

The  new  species  described  herein  tliffers  at  the  generic 
level.  Its  description  follows  the  review  of  other  \entrall\ 
notched  galeommatids:  Vasconiella  jeffreijsiana  (P.  Fi- 
scher, 1873),  Divariscintilla  maoria  Powell,  1932,  Try- 


phomyax  Icpidofunnis  Olsson,  1961,  and  T.  mexicaniis 
(Berrv,  1959). 


Ke\  to  the  \entrall\  notched  Galeommatidae: 
(See  table  1  for  additional  details) 

1 .  Shell  ventrally  notched  at  mid-valve  length  in  right 
valve  onK,  left  valve  orbicular  in  profile   

Vasconiella 

Both  valves  ventrally  notched  at  mid-valve  length     2 

2.  Shell  exterior  smooth,  unsculptured,  with  single, 
small  mid-valve  rib;  ventral  notch  broad  and  shal- 
low       Divariscintilla 

Shell  exterior  sculptured,  mid-valve  rib  promi- 
nent, ventral  notch  narrow  and  deep    3 

3.  Shell  exterior  sculptured  with  riblets  and  com- 
marginal striae  giving  the  exterior  a  cancellate 
appearance,  mid-valve  rib  bordered  on  either  side 

by  luinute  sulci    Tryplwniyax 

Shell  exterior  sculptured  with  fine  commarginal 
striae  only,  mid-valve  rib  composed  of  two  ribs 
fused  together  by  a  medial  suture  .  .  .   Bellascintilla 

Vasconiella  Dall,  1899 

Type  species  by  original  designation:  Hindsia  jeffrey- 
siaria  P.  Fischer,  1873.  The  genus  is  monot\pic. 

Diagnosis:  Highly  inetjuivalve  with  left  valve  larger 
than  right  valve.  Shell  ventrally  notched  at  mid-valve 
length  in  right  valve  onl\ ,  left  \alve  orbicular  in  profile. 
Tw  o  ribs,  fused  by  a  suture,  ascend  from  rnid-\  alve  notch 
of  right  valve  and  rise  to  middle  of  central  slope,  left 
\al\e  without  such  sculpture.  Cardinal  teeth  tubercular. 


Page  132 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


Figures  1-6.  Vasconiella  jcfrcysiana  yl\  Fisclii-r,  l.bT.i;.  SMNH  uiicataloged,  Sagrt-s,  Algarve  Prov,,  I'ortiigal,  17-33  m  1.  Exterior 
of  left  valve,  length  3.4  mm,  Poiital  do.s  Corvos,  17-22  m.  2-6.  Poiila  ilos  Caminos.  23-33  m.  sand  2.  Exterior  of  right  \alve, 
length  3..5  mm.  .3.  Interior  of  left  valve,  length  4.0  mm  4.  Interior  of  right  valve,  length  3  S  iiiiii  ...  Hinge  of  right  valve,  .scale 
bar  =  200  Mm.  6.  Hinge  of  left  valve,  scale  bar  =  200  Mm- 


C.  C.  Conev,  1990 


Page  133 


one  in  right  valve,  two  in  left  valve.  One  posterior  lateral 
tooth  present  in  each  valve. 

Remarks:  The  type  species  of  Vasconiella  was  origi- 
nalK  described  in  the  genus  Hindsia  Deshayes,  1858, 
not  H.  and  A.  Adams,  1853,  in  which  the  type  species 
has  a  geologic  range  of  Paleocene  to  L'pper  Eocene. 
Hindsia  was  replaced  bv  Hindsiella  Stoliczka,  1871,  and 
assigned  to  the  Sportellidae  by  Dal!  (1899:876).  The  ge- 
nus Vasconia  Fischer,  1873,  was  another  unnecessary 
new  name  for  Hindsia;  Fischer  (1887)  corrected  this 
error.  Dai!  (1899:875)  was  the  first  to  recognize  the  need 
for  generic  separation  of  "Vasconia"  jeffreysiana;  the 
name  Vasconiella  was  proposed  in  a  provisional  classi- 
fication scheme  without  discussion. 

Vasconiella  jeffreijsiana  (P.  Fischer,  1873) 
(figures  1-6,  31,  35) 

Hindsia  jeffreijsiana  P.  Fischer,  1873:83,  pf  2,  fig.  8;  1SS7: 

1032-1033,  fig.  776a,b. 
Scintilla  crispata  P.  Fischer,  1873:83,  pi.  2,  fig.  7;  P.  Fischer, 

1874:220;  P.  Fischer,  1878:178;  Hildago,  1917:631;  Aart- 

sen,  1982:125, 
Vasconia  jeffreijsiana;  P.  Fischer,  1874;  de  Folin  and  Perier, 

1878:351;  P.  Fischer,  1878:178;  Hildago,  1917:727. 
Lcpton  lepisma  Monterosato.  1878:314;  Waren,  1980:46;  .\art- 

sen,  1975:467;  1982:125. 
Vasconiella  jeffreijsiana;   Dall,    1898:875;   Pasteur-Humbert, 

1962:53,  pi.  19.  fig.  75;  Montero  Aguera,  1971:58;  Kisch, 

1958:21-24,  fig.  1,  pi.  3;  Nordsieck,  1969:91,  pi.  14,  fig. 

51.30;  Chavan,  1969:537,  figs.  35-7a,b;  Aartsen,  1975:466- 

467;  1982:125;  Bruggeman-Nannenga,  1975:14;  Dekker, 

1975:466;  Mienis,  1975:441;  1976:522;  Verduin,  1975:422; 

Bouchet,  Danrigal,  and  Huvghens,  1978:126,  pi  5,  fig.  17; 

Montero  Aguera.  1971:58-.59;  Cornel,  1982:36-43.  figs.  2- 

5;  Mikkelsen  and  Bieler,  1989:189. 
Solecardia  (Scinldlorbis)  crispata;  Montero  Aguera,  1971:223- 

224. 

Material  examined:  SMNH  uncataloged,  Pontal  dos 
Corvos,  Sagres,  Algarve  Prov.,  Portugal  (37°01.3'N, 
08''58.3'W),  17-22  m,  base  of  cliff,  May  1988,  one  left 
valve.  SMNH  uncataloged,  Ponta  dos  Caminos,  Sagres. 
Algarve  Prov.,  Portugal  (37°02'N,  08°52'W),  23-33  m, 
sand.  May  1988,  five  right  valves,  one  left  valve.  SMNH 
uncataloged,  Sagres  Harbor,  Algarve  Prov.,  Portugal 
(37°00.6'N,  08°55.6'W),  9-15  m.  May  1988,  one  left  valve. 
SMNH  uncataloged,  Baia  Baleeira,  Sagres,  Algarve  Prov., 
Portugal  (37°00J'N,  08°55.0"W),  12-17  m,  sand,  May 
1988,  one  right  valve. 

Description:  Right  and  left  valves  highly  disparate,  in- 
equivalve  by  virtue  of  deep  notch  in  ventral  shell  margin 
of  right  valve;  ventral  shell  margin  of  left  valve  subcir- 
cular.  Right  valve  attaining  4.2  mm  in  length  and  3.0 
mm  in  height;  left  valve  larger,  attaining  5  4  mm  in 
length  and  4.6  mm  in  height.  Exterior  of  right  valve 
smooth  except  for  growth  rings  and  two  ribs  joined  to- 
gether by  suture  radiating  from  umbo,  becoming  more 
raised  where  joining  notch  of  ventral  shell  margin.  In- 
terior of  right  valve  with  corresponding  sulcus  radiating 


of  ventral  shell  margin.  Left  valve  subcircular  in  outline. 
Exterior  surface  smooth,  with  many  evenK-  spaced  corn- 
marginal  striae  on  shell  exterior  from  middle  of  valve  to 
valve  margin.  Fine  radiating  riblets  faintly  impressed  on 
ventral  margin  of  interior  of  right  valve,  strongly  im- 
pressed on  ventral  margin  of  interior  of  left  valve.  One 
tubercular  cardinal  tooth  and  one  short  posterior  lateral 
tooth  in  right  valve;  two  cardinal  teeth  in  left  valve, 
anterior  cardinal  wedge-shaped,  posterior  cardinal  tu- 
bercular; one  short  posterior  lateral  tooth. 

Shell  ultrastructure  (figure  35):  Shell  thickness  of  spec- 
imen studied  35  /um,  consisting  of  five  distinct  layers. 
Exterior  layer  of  thin,  blocky  simple  prismatic  structure, 
underlain  by  layer  of  fine-grained  homogeneous  struc- 
ture; median  and  thickest  layer  of  crossed-lamellar  struc- 
ture, underlain  by  fine-grained  homogeneous  structure; 
innermost  layer  of  thin  blocky  simple  prismatic  structure. 

Distribution:  Bay  of  Biscay  and  Mediterranean  Sea 
(Franc,  1960)  to  Morocco  (Pasteur-Humbert,  1962),  north 
to  Plage  de  I'Aber,  Kerfany  les  Pins  and  Quiberon  on 
the  French  Atlantic  coast  (Aartsen,  1982). 

Remarks:  The  notched  right  valve  of  Vasconiella  jef- 
freijsiana was  described  b\'  P.  Fischer  (1873)  as  Hindsia 
jeffreijsiana  while  the  unnotched  left  valve  also  was  de- 
scribed by  P.  Fischer  (1873)  as  Scintilla  crispata.  Kisch 
(1958)  reported  the  discovery  of  to  disparate  valves  joined 
together  in  a  single  specimen;  however,  he  did  not  as- 
sociate the  name  S.  crispata  with  the  left  valve  and 
described  and  illustrated  the  left  valve  as  if  for  the  first 
time.  Cornet  (1982),  in  a  partial  synonymy  of  Vasconiella 
jeffreijsiana,  was  first  to  recognize  and  associate  the  left 
valve  with  the  original  description  of  S.  crispata. 

Cornet  (1982)  illustrated  the  hinge  of  both  left  and 
right  valves  and  provided  additional  description  of  the 
hinge  and  exterior  "deposit",  but  stated  in  error  that 
"there  are  no  true  lateral  teeth."  Scanning  electron  pho- 
tomicrographs of  the  hinge  clearh  show  the  presence  of 
a  short  posterior  lateral  tooth  in  the  right  \alve  (figure 
5),  and  a  short  posterior  lateral  tooth  in  the  left  valve 
(figure  6).  The  single  cardinal  tooth  of  the  right  valve 
fits  beneath  the  two  cardinal  teeth  of  the  left  valve,  and 
the  lateral  tooth  of  the  left  valve  fits  beneath  the  lateral 
tooth  of  the  right  valve,  forming  a  ver\  effective  fulcrum 
and  counterlocking  hinge.  SEM  views  of  the  mid-valve 
ridge  (figure  31)  show  it  to  be  two  ridges  fused  together 
by  a  radial  suture. 

The  anatomy  of  Vasconiella  jeffreijsiana  was  de- 
scribed in  detail  by  Cornet  (1982).  No  positive  evidence 
for  commensial  association  with  stomatopods  has  been 
documented;  however.  Cornet  (1982)  noted  that  the  dis- 
tribution of  Vasconiella  jeffreijsiana  was  congruent  with 
that  of  Lysiosquilla  eusehia  (Risso,  1816). 


DivariscintUla  Powell,  1932 

Type  species  by  original  designation:     Dirariscintilla 

maoria  Powell,  1932   The  genus  is  monotypic. 


C.  C.  Coney,  1990 


Page  135 


Diagnosis:  Both  valves  veiitralK  notcheci  at  inici-valve 
lengtli,  ventral  notch  broad  and  shallow.  Shell  exterior 
smooth,  unsculptured,  with  single,  small  miil-val\e  rib 
beginning  at  mid-valve  notch  and  ending  on  central  slope. 
Two  tubercular  cardinal  teeth  in  right  valve,  left  valve 
without  teeth. 

Divariscintilla  maoria  Powell,  1932 
(figures  7-12,  32,  36) 

DiiariscititiUa  maciria  Powell,  1932:66-67,  pi.  6,  fig.  1  [liolo- 
tvpe,  .\uckland  Museum];  1962122;  Judd,  1971;343-353, 
figs.  1-7;  Morton.  1975:36.5,  368;  1976:32;  Mikkelsen  and 
Bieler,  1989:175-195, 

\  asconicUa  {Divariscintilla)  maoria;  Chavan,  1969:537;  Pow- 
ell, 1976:126. 

Material  examined:  NMNZ  M21965,  Cheltenham 
Beach,  Auckland,  New  Zealand,  from  Lysiosqiiilla  spi- 
nosa  burrows,  one  left  valve,  one  right  valve,  and  two 
specimens  with  paired  valves. 

Description:  Shell  equivalve,  inequilateral.  The  second 
largest  ot  the  ventralK  notched  galeommatids  with  both 
valves  attaining  6.0  mm  in  length  and  4.9  mm  in  height. 
Anterior  end  shorter  than  posterior  as  defined  by  notch 
on  mid-ventral  margin.  Fine,  week  rib  radiating  from 
umbo  to  ventral  notch  in  both  valves,  otherwise  shell 
exterior  w  ith  commarginal  growth  lines  divaricating  at 
radiating  rib.  Interior  of  valves  minutely  granulate,  shell 
margin  smooth;  weak  interior  sulcus  radiating  from  beak 
cavity  to  ventral  notch  and  corresponding  to  external 
radiating  rib.  Ligament  amphidetic,  mostly  posterior  to 
beak  supported  by  n)mphs.  Hinge  of  right  valve  with 
one  tubercular  cardinal  tooth,  anterior  to  large  resilium 
(figure  11).  Left  valve  lacking  cardinal  teeth,  narrow- 
horizontal  resilifer  under  posterior  side  of  beak;  lateral 
tooth  posterior  to  beak,  terminating  at  terminus  of  nymph. 

Shell  ultrastructure  (figure  36):  Shell  thickness  of  spec- 
imen examined  25  nm.  Shell  consisting  of  three  distinct 
layers.  Exterior  shell  layer  of  fine  grained  homogeneous 
structure;  median  and  thickest  layer  consisting  of  inter- 
sected crossed  platy  structure;  interior  shell  layer  of  ir- 
regular simple  prismatic  structure. 

Distribution:  Scattered  shells  have  been  found  through- 
out New  Zealand  (Judd,  1971). 

Remarks:  Powells  (1932)  description,  although  de- 
tailed, lacks  mention  of  the  follow  ing  features.  The  lig- 
ament is  described  as  being  amphidetic  without  mention 
of  a  nymph.  The  ligament  is  primarily  posterior  to  the 
beak  where  it  is  supported  by  a  nymph  (figure  12),  yet 
the  ligament  does  pass  between  the  beaks,  terminating 
slightly  anterior  to  them  where  it  is  supported  by  a  small 


nymph  Additionalh ,  no  mention  is  made  of  the  lateral 
tooth  of  the  left  valve,  the  graindar  interior  shell  surface, 
or  the  weak  external  rib  that  radiates  from  umbo  to 
ventral  notch  (figure  32),  with  a  corresponding  sulcus  on 
interior  of  valves. 

Judd  (1971)  documented  the  anatom\.  behavior,  and 
commensal  relationshij)  of  Divariacintilta  maoria  with 
stomatopods. 

Tryphamyax  Olsson,  196] 

Type  species:  Tryphamyax  Icpidoformis  Olsson,  1961 
by  original  designation.  The  genus  Tryphoiiiyax  pres- 
ently contains  two  species:  T.  Icpidoformis  Olsson,  1961, 
and  T.  tnexicaniis  (Berry,  1959). 

Diagnosis:  Shell  quadrate  or  subovate  with  a  prominent 
radial  mid-valve  rib  from  mid-valve  notch  to  umbo  bound 
on  either  side  b\  minute  sulci.  Cancellate  sculpture  of 
exterior  produced  by  radial  riblets  and  commarginal  stri- 
ae. One  or  two  tubercular  cardinal  teeth  in  right  \alve, 
two  in  left  valve.  One  or  two  lateral  teeth  in  right  valve, 
one  lateral  tooth  in  left  valve. 

Tryphamyax  lepidafarmis  Olsson,  1961 
(figures  13-16,  33) 

Tryi>hi)iuyax  Icpidoformis  Ol.ssoii.  1961:240-241,  pi    36.  figs. 

4,  4a  [hcilotvpe,  ANSP  218922];  Keen,  1971: 133- 135.  fig. 

308;  Bernard,  1983:30. 
Tryphamyax  Icpidoformis  Incvis  Olsson,  1961:241.  pi,  36,  figs. 

7,  7l)'lholotype.  ANSP  218923], 

Material  examined:  LACM  77-144,4,  Punta  Chame, 
Golfo  de  Panama,  Panama  (08°41'N,  79°39'W),  shallow 
dredging,  two  left  valves.  LACM  62-22.1,  Bahia  Cholla, 
W  of  Puerto  Pefiasco,  Sonora,  Mexico  (31°19.6'N, 
113°37.7'W),  intertidal  screenings,  one  right  valve. 

Description:  Shell  equivalve,  inequilateral.  Outline  of 
shell  rectangular.  Anterior  of  valves  shorter  than  poste- 
rior as  defined  by  notch  on  mid-ventral  \alve  margin 
Wide,  pronounced  rib  radiating  from  umbo  to  \entral 
notch  in  both  valves  (figure  33).  Exterior  of  valves  with 
regularlv  spaced  riblets  radiating  from  umbo  and  densely 
covered  with  thin,  closely  spaced  commarginal  multi- 
costae.  Interior  of  valves  with  regularly  spaced,  pro- 
nounced ribs  radiating  from  umbo  cavity,  becoming 
slightly  divaricated  anteriorly;  weak  interior  sulcus  ra- 
diating from  beak  cavity  to  ventral  notch  and  corre- 
sponding to  external  radiating  rib.  Ligament  internal. 
Hinge  of  right  valve  with  one  large  tubercular  cardinal 
tooth  and  a  smaller  lamellar  cardinal  tooth  anterior  and 
dorsal  to  larger  tooth;  two  very  short  lateral  teeth  located 
posterior  to  cardinal  teeth;  ventral  lateral  tooth  descend- 


Figures  7-12.  Divariscintilla  maoria  Powell,  1932.  NMNZ  M.21965.  Cheltenham  Beach,  Auckland,  New  Zealand,  from  Lysiosqiiilla 
spinosa  burrows,  7.  Exterior  of  left  valve,  lengtli  6  1  mm.  8.  Exterior  of  right  valve,  length  6.0  mm  9.  Interior  of  left  valve,  length 
5  0  mm,  10.  Interior  of  right  valve,  length  5,0  mm  11.  Hinge  of  right  valve,  scale  bar  =  500  /im.  12.  Hinge  of  left  valve,  scale 
bar  =  200  ^m 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


Figures  13-16.  Tryphomyax  lepidofurmis  Olsson,  1961.  13-14.  16.  L.\CM  77-144  4.  Punta  t:lia.ne,  Golfo  dv  Panama,  Panama 
13.  Exterior  of  left  valve,  length  5.4  mm.  14.  Interior  of  left  valve,  length  5.4  mm.  15.  LACM  62-22.1,  Bahia  Cholla  .Sonora 
Mexico.  Hinge  of  right  valve,  scale  bar  =  200  nm    16.  Hinge  of  left  valve,  scale  bar  =  200  A^m 

Figures  17-20.  Tryphomyax  mexicanus  (Bcrrv,  1959)  17.  L.ACM  65-82.1,  N  end  Isla  CeraKo,  Culf  of  California,  Raja  California 
Sur,  Mexico,  left  valve  exterior,  length  5.7  mm.  18.  20.  L.\CM  71-22.1,  S  of  P.inta  .\reim.  Gulf  of  California,  Raja  California  Sur, 
Mexico.  18.  Interior  of  left  valve,  length  29  ■mn  19.  L.\CM  66-21  3.  from  off  Punta  .\rena,  Culf  of  California.  P.ija  California 
Sur,  hinge  of  right  valve,  scale  bar  =  200  ^m   20.  Hinge  of  left  valve,  scale  bar  =  200  nm 


C.  C.  Conev,  1990 


Page  13' 


ingsharpK  from  beak,  dorsal  lateral  tooth  approxiiiiateK 
parallel  to  hinge  margin;  obscure  resilifer  posterior  to 
tubercular  cardinal  tooth.  Left  valve  w  ith  two  cardinal 
teeth,  anterior  cardinal  tooth  tubercular,  separated  from 
posterior  cardinal  tooth  by  curved  fossa;  posterior  car- 
dinal tooth  C-shaped,  curved  anteriorly;  posterior  lateral 
tooth  descending  sharply  from  beak,  separateil  from  pos- 
terior cardinal  tooth  by  resilifer  forming  triangular  fossa 
with  apex  reaching  beak. 

Distribution:  A  single  valve  is  reported  here  from  the 
head  of  the  Gulf  of  California.  This  may  have  been  due 
to  a  labeling  error,  as  all  other  records  are  from  Panama. 

Remarks:  This  species  is  one  of  the  rarest  bivalves  in 
the  Eastern  Pacific.  It  was  reported  b\  Olsson  (1961)  to 
occur  in  association  with  "worm  tubes"  Anatomy,  be- 
havior, and  reproduction  are  unknown. 

Although  Bernard  {1983)  listed  Tryphoinyax  Icpido- 
formis  Olsson  as  a  synonym  of  T.  mexicanus  (Berry), 
both  taxa  are  recognized  here  as  distinct  species.  Com- 
parisons with  T.  mexicanus  are  given  below. 

Tryphomyax  mexicanus  (Berr\,  1959) 
(figures  17-20,  37) 

Caleomma  mexicaiuis  Berry,  1959:108-109  [hi)li>t\pt',  CAS 
043981,  paratvpe,  SDNHM  42813];  Hertz,  1984:18,  fig. 
35. 

Tryphomyax  mexicanus:  Keen,  1971135,  fig.  308;  Bernard, 
1983:30, 

Material  examined:  LACM  69-21.4,  W  side  Isla  Mir- 
amar,  S  of  Puertecitos,  Gulf  of  California,  Baja  Califor- 
nia, Mexico  (30°04,8'N,  114°33.0'W),  15-26  m,  sand,  one 
left  valve.  LACM  69-22.3,  W  of  Isla  San  Luis,  S  of  Puer- 
tecitos, Gulf  of  California,  Baja  California,  Mexico 
(29°57.80'N,  I14°28.0'W),  26  m,  sand,  right  valve  (bro- 
ken for  shell  ultrastructure  after  measurement).  LACM 
85-21.1,  Juncalito,  Gulf  of  California,  Baja  California 
Sur,  Mexico  (25°53'N,  1 1 1°20.5' W),  beach  drift,  one  right 
valve,  one  left  valve.  LACM  65-82.1,  off  N  end  Isla 
Ceralvo,  Gulf  of  California,  Baja  California  Sur,  Mexico 
(24°23'N,  109°55.5'W),  9  m,  one  left  valve.  LACM  66- 
21.3,  off  Punta  Arena,  Gulf  of  California,  Baja  California 
Sur,  Mexico  (23°32'N,  109°28'W),  18-37  m,  sand,  one 
right  valve.  LACM  71-22.1,  Los  Tezos  Ranch,  1.5  mile 
S  of  Punta  Arena,  Gulf  of  California,  Baja  California  Sur, 
Mexico  (23°31'N,  109°00'VV),  9  m,  one  left  valve. 

Description:  Shell  equivalve,  inequilateral.  Largest  of 
the  ventrally  notched  galeommatids  with  valves  reaching 
6.4  mm  in  length  and  4.0  mm  in  height.  Outline  of  shell 
oblong  and  rounded,  not  rectangular,  .interior  of  valves 
shorter  than  posterior  as  defined  b>  notch  on  mid-\entral 
valve  margin.  A  weak  rib  radiating  from  umbo  to  ventral 
notch  in  both  valves.  Exterior  of  valves  with  irregularly 
spaced  riblets  radiating  from  the  central  slope  to  the 
ventral  margin;  denseK  co\ered  w  ith  thin,  closely  spaced 
commarginal  multicostae.  Interior  of  valves  smooth,  ex- 
cept ventral  margin,  which  is  crenulate  with  small  ra- 


diating riblets.  Hinge  of  right  valve  with  one  large  tu- 
bercular tooth,  and  posterior  fossa  for  resilifer,  both 
located  under  beak;  one  large  lateral  tooth  posterior  to 
resilifer.  Left  \alve  with  two  cardinal  teeth,  posterior 
cardinal  tooth  tubercular,  arising  from  directK  under 
the  beak;  anterior  cardinal  tooth  lamelliform,  descending 
at  an  angle  from  beak.  Lateral  tooth  of  left  valve  hori- 
zontal and  parallel  to  dorsal  hinge  line. 

Shell  ultrastructure  (figure  37):  Shell  thickne.ss  of  spec- 
imen examined  59  ^m,  with  a  single  distinct  layer,  con- 
sisting of  ver\  fine  complex  crossed-lamellar  structure. 

Distribution:  Throughout  the  Gulf  of  California.  Pre- 
viously reported  only  from  the  head  of  the  Gulf  of  Cal- 
ifornia (Berry,  1959;  Keen,  1971).  The  distribution  is  here 
extended  south  to  Punta  Arena,  Gulf  of  C:alifornia,  Baja 
California  Sur,  Mexico.  The  more  extensive  distribution 
cited  by  Bernard  (1983)  from  the  head  of  the  Gulf  of 
California  to  Panama  was  a  result  of  his  synonomy  of  T. 
lepidoformis  with  T.  mexicanus. 

Remarks:  This  species  differs  from  T.  lepidoformis  in 
profile,  being  rounded  rather  than  rectangular,  in  both 
external  and  internal  shell  sculpture,  and  in  having  a 
different  hinge  structure.  The  posterior  lateral  teeth  in 
the  right  valves  are  different  in  both  number  and  relative 
size,  T.  nuwicanus  having  a  single  large  posterior  lateral 
(figure  19  truncates  prior  to  posterior  terminus  of  lateral 
tooth  due  to  accidental  shell  breakage)  whereas  T.  lep- 
idoformis has  two  small  short  posterior  lateral  teeth  in 
the  right  valve.  The  primary  distribution  is  more  north- 
ern than  that  of  T.  lepidoformis.  the  records  limited  to 
the  Gulf  of  California,  .\natomy,  ecolog) ,  beha\ior,  and 
reproduction  are  unknown. 

Bellascintilla  new  genus 

Type  species,  here  designated:  Bcllascinlilla  parma- 
leeana  new  species.  The  genus  is  monotypic. 

Diagnosis:  Shell  subtriangular  in  outline  with  beaks  an- 
terior. Two  distinct  ribs  fused  together  by  medial  suture 
arising  from  mid-valve  notch,  terminating  abruptK'  on 
umbo.  Shell  sculptured  w  ith  fine  commarginal  striae  that 
ascends  towards  mid-\al\e  ribs.  Cardinal  teeth  cunei- 
form, two  in  each  valve.  One  posterior  lateral  tooth  in 
left  valve,  two  posterior  lateral  teeth  in  right  valve.  Re- 
silifer between  cardinal  teeth  and  lateral  teeth. 

Etymology:  The  name  is  a  Latin  compouiul  derived 
from  scintilla,  spark,  and  bella,  beautiful. 

Remarks:  The  smallest  of  the  ventralK  notched  galeom- 
matids, the  shell  attaining  4.5  mm  in  length  and  3.5  mm 
in  height.  Bellascintilla  (figure  38)  differs  from  Divar- 
iscintdla  (figure  36)  in  shell  ultrastructure  (thickest  la\er 
of  crossed  lamellar  structure  underlain  by  fine  grained 
homogeneous  structure  rather  than  thickest  la\er  of  in- 
tersected crossed  platv  structure  underlain  by  irregular 
simple  prismatic  structure  as  in  Dicariscinlilla).  being 
more  like  that  of  Vasconiella  (figure  36);  in  exterior  shell 


Page  138 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


Figures  21-24.  Bellascintilla  parmaleeana  new  species.  Holotype,  LACM  2446,  off  Bahia  Herradura,  Puntarenas  Province,  Costa 
Rica.  21.  Interior  of  left  \alve,  length  .3  2  mm.  22.  Hinge  of  left  valve,  scale  bar  =  200  fin\  23.  Interior  of  right  valve  length  3  1 
mm.  24.  Hinge  of  right  valve,  scale  bar  =  200  ^m. 


.sculpture  (fine  commarginal  striae,  with  small  undulating 
ribs  along  posterior  dorsal  margin  and  ventral  margin 
internally  crenulate  rather  than  essentially  smooth,  fea- 
tureless sculpture  as  in  Divariscintilla).  in  form  and  num- 
ber ot  the  mid-valve  ribs  (two  fuseil  together  by  suture 
rather  than  a  single  small  rib  as  in  Divariscintilla);  and 
in  the  hinge  teeth  (cuniform  rather  than  tuberculiform). 
Based  on  similarity  of  shell  ultrastructure,  and  the  for- 
mation of  the  mid-valve  ridge,  Bellascintilla  also  rec|uires 
comparison  to  Vasconietla.  These  genera  differ  in  left 
valve  profile  (triangular  and  ventrally  notched  rather 
than  suborbicular  and  lacking  a  ventral  notch  as  in  Vas- 
coniella),  and  in  the  mor|5hology  of  their  hinge  teeth 
(cuneiform  rather  than  tuberculiform).  Tryphomyax  and 
Bellascintilla  do  not  share  any  of  the  features  studied 
here  other  than  the  presence  of  a  ventral  iiotcfi. 

The  discovery  of  a  new  species  that  shares  with  the 
type  species  of  Divariscintilla  the  presence  of  a  notch  in 
the  ventral  margin  of  both  valves  inilialK  suggested  that 
Divariscintilla  includes  species  possessing  this  specific 
character.  Comparison  of  shell  ultrastructure  characters, 
and  the  formation  of  the  mid-vaKe  ridge,  re\<'al  that 
Bellascintilla  is  more  clo.sely  related  to  Vasconiella  than 
to  Divariscintilla,  despite  the  initial  similarity  of  shell 
form  between  Bellascintilla  and  Divariscintilla.  The 
hinge  teeth  of  Bellascintilla  are  cuniform  rather  than 


tuberculiform  as  in  Vasconiclla,  Divariscintilla  and  Trij- 
phomijax  suggesting  that  possession  of  a  notch  in  the 
ventral  valve  margin  could  be  convergent,  or  that  the 
cuneiform  teeth  of  Bellascintilla  evolved  from  tuber- 
culiform teeth  of  its  ancestor. 


Bellascintilla  parmaleeana  new  species 
(hgures  21-30,  34,  38) 

Type  locality:  Off  Bahia  Herradura,  Puntarenas  Prov- 
ince, Costa  Rica  (9°38.S'N,  84°40.8'\\').  37  m  (R/V 
SEARCHER  station  451;  LACM  station  72-54). 

Type  material:  Holotype:  L.\C"M  244(i;  articulating  pair 
of  valves,  left  \al\e  length  3.2  mm  (figures  21-22),  right 
valve  length  3  1  nun  (figures  23-24),  height  both  valves 
2.4  mm. 

LAC>"M  2447,  five  paratvpes,  Isla  ilel  Cano,  Puntarenas 
Province,  Costa  Rica  (8°44.0'N,  8.3°52.5'\V'),  12  m,  sand, 
R/V  SEARCHER  (LAC:M  station  72-H4):  specimen  a. 
left  valve,  length  3.6  mm,  height  2.6  mm  (figure  25); 
specimen  /),  left  valve,  length  4.1  mm,  height  3.4  mm 
(figures  26-27);  specimen  c,  right  vaKc,  length  3.1  mm, 
height  2.4  mm  (figures  28,  34);  specimen  (/,  right  valve 
length  3.4  mm,  height  2.5  mm;  specimen  c,  right  valve 
length  3.5  mm,  height  2.9  mm. 


C.  C.  Conev,  1990 


27   3 


Figures  25-30.  Belhscintilla  parmaleeana  new  spec.es.  Paratypes,  25-28.  LAC;M  244,  Isla  de  t.ano  I  untarenus  1  r,.^■■  ce 
Costa  Rica,  25.  Specimen  a.  exterior  of  left  valve,  length  3.6  mm  26.  Specimen  /.interior  left  valve,  ler.^th  1 1  ""•'_  -^ '  •  ^'^  ""' 
b.  hinge  of  left  valve,  scale  bar  =  200  ^m.  28.  Specimen  c,  exterior  of  right  valve,  length  ,1  nun  2«)-3(  .  'A  M  2^4S,  ';  '<-  '  " 
El  Tule  and  Rancho  Palmilla,  (U.lf  of  California,  Raja  CaHfornia  Snr,  Mexico.  29.  Interior  oi  nght  valve,  length  4  ..  mm  JO.  Hmtc 
of  right  valve,  scale  bar  =  200  ^m 


LACM  2448,  paratv  pe,  between  Rancho  Ei  Tule  and 
Rancho  Palmilla,  Gulf  of  California,  Baja  California  Sur, 
Mexico  (22°58'N,  109°48'W),  18-37  ni,  sand  (LACM  sta- 
tion 66-17),  right  valve,  length  4.5  mm,  heiglit  3.5  mm 
(figures  29-30). 

LACM  2449,  paratype,  Playa  Nancite,  N  side  Golfo 
de  Papaguavo,  Parque  Naeional  Santa  Rosa,  Guanacaste 
Province,  Costa  Rica  (10°48'N,  S5°42'\V),  beach  drift 


(LACM  station  86-26).  left  valve,  length  3.1  mm.  height 
2.5  mm. 

LACM  2450,  seven  paratypes,  Punta  Cfiame,  Golfo  de 
Panama,  Panama  (08°4rN,  79°39'\V),  shallow  dredging 
(LAC;M  station  77-144),  specimen  a,  right  valve,  length 
4.2  mm,  height  3.3  mm;  specimen  h.  right  valve,  length 
3  4  nmi,  height  2.7  mm;  specimen  c,  right  valve,  length 
3.5  mm,  height  2  6  nmi;  specimen  il.  right  valve,  length 


Page  140 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


Figures  31-34.     Comparison  of  mid-valve  ribs.  31.  Vasconiella  jeffreijsiana.  SMNH  uncataloged,  scale  bar  =  500  ^m.  32. 

Diiuriscintillii  maoria.  NMNZ  M. 21965,  scale  bar  =  500  /zm.  33.  Tnjphoniijax  lepidoformis,  LACM  77-144.4,  scale  bar  =  500 
Mill   .31-.  Bellascinlilla  piirmalceana  new  species,  paratype,  LACM  2447,  specimen  c,  scale  bar  =  500  /jni. 


3.3  mm,  height  2.7  mm;  specimen  e,  right  valve,  length 
2.9  mm,  height  2.3  mm;  specimen  /,  left  valve,  length 
4.1  mm,  height  3.1  mm;  specimen  g,  left  valve,  length 
3.5  mm,  height  2.9  mm. 

LACM  24.51,  paratype,  N  side  Isla  Salango,  Manabi 
Province,  Ecuador  (01°35.5'S,  80°53.4'W),  6-12  m,  under 
rocks  and  coral  (LACM  station  80-65),  left  valve,  length 
2.8  mm,  height  2.1  mm. 

USNM  859410,  paratv  pe  from  type  locality,  right  valve, 
length  2.7  mm,  liciglit  2  0  mm. 

Description:  Shell  ineiiuivalve,  inequilateral,  very  small 
(to  4.5  mm).  Ligament  an  internal  resilium.  Left  valve 
slightK  longer  than  right  valve.  Left  valve  with  two 
cuneiform  cardinal  teeth,  posterior  cardinal  low,  apex 
directly  under  beak,  anterior  cardinal  with  ajiex  anterior 
to  beak,  widening  as  it  tlesceiids,  two  cardinal  teeth  sep- 
arated by  narrowly  radiating  fossa.  Hesilifer  separating 
cardinal  teeth  from  posterior  lateral  teeth  in  both  valves. 
Left  valve  with  single  downward  curving  lateral  tooth. 
Right  valve  with  two  radiating  cuneiform  cardinal  teeth, 
apices  fused  immediateK  below  beak,  wiilening  as  they 
descend.  Teeth  separated  by  deep  fos.sa  that  widens  as 
it  descends.  Two  posterior  lateral  teeth  in  right  valve 
posterior  to  resilium  and  cardinal  teeth.  Posterior  and 


anterior  adductor  muscle  scars  equal  in  size,  posterior 
adductor  muscle  scar  located  higher  in  valves  than  an- 
terior adductor  scar.  V'entral  margin  of  shell  in  both 
valves  internally  crenulate.  Mid-ventral  notch  pro- 
nounced giving  rise  to  a  raised  triangular  fold  that  as- 
cends dorsalK  to  umbo.  This  interior,  raised  triangular 
fold  corresponds  externally  to  two  ribs  joined  together 
by  suture  that  arises  from  mid-ventral  notch  on  ventral 
margin  of  exterior  shell  \  aK  e  and  ascends  towards  umbo. 
The  fold  truncates  abruptly  within  0.3  to  0.5  mm  of 
umbo.  Exterior  sculpture  of  both  valves  \\  ith  fine  com- 
marginal  striae.  Small  undulating  ribs  radiating  along 
posterior  dorsal  margin  of  shell,  less  developed  along 
anterior  shell  margin. 

Shell  ullrastriicture  (figure  38):  Shell  thickness  of  spec- 
imen examined  37  /jm,  consisting  ot  tour  distinct  lavers. 
Exterior  laver  of  ver\  thin,  blocky,  simple  prismatic 
structure,  underlain  In  layer  of  fine  grained  homoge- 
neous structure;  median,  thickest  la\'er  consisting  of 
crossed  lamellar  structure,  underlain  by  layer  of  fine 
grained  homogeneous  structure. 

Distriliution:  Hancho  El  Tule  and  Rancho  Palmilla,  Gulf 
of   California,    Baja   California   Sur,   Mexico  (22°58'N, 


C.  C.  Conev,  1990 


141 


Figure§  35-38.  Comparison  of  shell  ultrastructure.  Exterior  surface  at  top.  SEM  views  taken  on  central  slope  of  valves.  35. 
Vasconiella  jcffreysiana.  SMNH  uncataloged,  scale  bar  =  20  Mm.  36.  Divariscintilla  maoria,  NMNZ  M. 21965,  scale  bar  =  10  Mm. 
37.  Tnjphomyax  mexicanus.  LACM  59-22.3,  scale  bar  =  20  M'n.  38.  Bellascintilla  parmaleeana  new  species,  LACM  72-54  (from 
same  lot  as  liolotype),  scale  bar  =  20  ijm. 


109°48'W)  to  Isia  Salango,  Manabi  Province,  Ecuador 
(01°35.5'S,  80°53.4'W). 

Remarks:  Known  only  from  dead  valves.  This  species 
is  tfie  smallest  of  the  ventrally  notched  galeommatids. 
Information  concerning  the  anatomy,  reproduction,  be- 
havior and  commensal  association,  if  any,  of  this  bivalve 
is  not  available. 

Etymology:  Named  in  honor  of  Dr.  Paul  W.  Parmalee, 
Director  of  the  Frank  H.  McClung  Museum  and  Pro- 
fessor of  Zooarchaeology,  Emeritus,  Universit\'  of  Ten- 
nessee, Knoxville,  Tennessee,  who  first  inspired  m\  in- 
terest in  bivalve  mollusks. 

DISCUSSION 

The  family  Vasconiellidae  was  erected  by  Scarlato  and 
Starobogatov  (1979)  to  accommodate  the  ventrally 
notched  genus  Vasconiella  Dall,  1S99.  Until  the  anatomy 
of  more  of  the  Galeommatidae  has  been  studied  and 
their  relationships  better  understood,  it  seems  premature 
to  divide  the  Galeommatidae  into  subfamilies,  much  less 
additional  families. 


Tryphomyax  shares  with  Vasconiella  and  Divariscin- 
tilla the  tubercuiiform  cardinal  teeth.  However,  the  shell 
ultrastructures  of  these  three  genera  exhibit  major  dif- 
ferences. Although  the  shell  ultrastructure  of  Galeomma 
Turton,  1825,  is  unknown,  the  shell  of  Tryphomyax  has 
a  basic  morpholog)'  suggesting  affinity  with  Galeomma. 

The  presence  of  a  ventral  notch  in  the  shell  margin  is 
the  single  shell  character  that  genera  Vasconiella.  Di- 
variscintilla. Tryphomyax.  and  Rellascintilla  share  in 
common.  What  is  the  purpose  of  the  \entral  notch,  and 
does  it  serve  the  same  function  in  all  four  genera :■  Powell 
(1932)  believed  the  ventral  notch  to  be  "a  true  ventral 
bvssus-sinus";  however,  recent  workers  have  demonstrat- 
ed no  correlation  between  the  ventral  notch  and  the 
byssus.  Cornet  (1982)  showed  that  the  outer  and  middle 
mantle  of  the  right  side,  adjacent  to  the  v  entralK  notched 
right  valve  of  Vasconiella.  formed  a  deep  indentation 
whereas  the  inner  mantle  fold  was  straight.  In  Divari- 
scintilla however,  Judd  (1971)  reported  that  the  mantle 
beneath  the  "'slit"  (\entral  notch)  was  not  "incised."  As 
the  structure  of  the  mantle  beneath  the  notch  differs  in 
these  two  genera,  a  functional  similaritv  is  regarded  as 
unlikely.  Judd  (1971)  demonstrated  that  the  placement 


Page  142 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


of  the  byssus  on  the  foot  of  Divariscintilla  was  not  an- 
atomically correlated  with  the  location  of  the  ventral 
notch.  He  further  reported  that  the  ventral  notch  was 
completely  absent  from  juveniles  less  than  2-3  mm  in 
length,  and  did  not  develop  until  the  shell  was  3.5-4.5 
mm.  Cox  (1969)  stated  that  the  byssus  of  early  postlarval 
stages  of  many  bivalves  serves  as  an  anchor  and  prevents 
larvae  from  suffocating  by  suspending  the  juveniles  above 
the  level  of  .sediment  deposition.  Most  bivalves  lack  a 
l)\ssus,  or  it  is  vestigial,  in  the  adult  stage.  The  devel- 
opment of  the  ventral  notch  in  Divariscintilla  late  in  its 
life  cycle  may  be  taken  as  indirect  evidence  against  the 
ventral  notch  functioning  to  accommodate  the  byssus. 
Other  galeonimatids  that  lack  the  ventral  notch  possess 
either  a  byssus  or  a  byssal  gland  in  the  foot  such  as 
reported  in  Phlyctaenachlamijs  b>  Popham  (1939).  The 
function  of  the  ventral  notch  in  the  four  genera  treated 
here  remains  unresolved. 

Tryphomyax  has  the  thickest  shell  (maximum  thick- 
ness observed  59  ^m),  and  is  composed  of  only  a  single 
layer,  which  is  structurally  different  from  that  of  the 
other  three  ventrally  notched  galeonimatids.  Bellascin- 
tilla  has  a  thinner  shell  (maximum  thickness  observed  37 
/nmj,  composed  of  four  layers.  The  shell  ultrastructure 
of  Vasconiella  is  remarkably  similar  to  that  of  Bella- 
scintilla,  but  is  thinner  (maximum  thickness  observed  34 
/uni),  and  has  an  additional  structural  layer.  Thus,  Vas- 
coniella has  the  most  complex  shell  ultrastructure  of  the 
ventralK  notched  galeonimatids  studied  to  date.  Divar- 
iscintilla has  the  thinnest  shell  of  this  group  of  galeom- 
matids  (maximum  observed  thickness  25  nm),  composed 
of  three  la\ers  that  are  unlike  the  ultrastructures  of  the 
other  ventrally  notched  galeommatid  genera.  None  of 
these  genera  conform  to  the  shell  ultrastructure  reported 
by  Taylor,  Kennedy,  and  Hall  (1973)  for  two  species  of 
Scintilla  in  terms  of  numbers  of  shell  layers,  or  their 
composition.  In  contrast,  they  report  finding  two  layers, 
an  outer  layer  composed  of  crossed  lamellar  structure 
and  an  inner  layer  of  complex  crossed  lamellar  structure 
in  S'.  aiveni  Deshayes  and  S.  rosea  Desha\es  (Taylor  et 
ai.  1973).  Further  investigation  into  the  comparative 
shell  ultrastructure  of  galeommataceans  is  warranted, 
both  to  provide  characters  for  phylogenetic  analysis  as 
well  as  to  examine  possible  variation  within  and  between 
populations  and  environments. 

In  addition  to  a  strong  similaritv  in  shell  ultrastructure, 
Vasconiella  and  Bellascintilla  show  similarity  in  the  for- 
mation of  the  mid-valve  ridge,  which  in  both  genera 
exhibits  two  radiating  ribs  fused  together  with  a  suture 
between  them.  Prior  to  this  stud\,  Vasconiella,  Divar- 
iscintilla and  Tryphornijax  were  reported  to  have  a  single 
mid-valve  radiating  sulcus  (Fischer,  1873;  Olsson,  1961; 
Powell,  1932).  Rased  on  shell  ultrastructure  and  the  for- 
mation of  the  fu.sed  mid-vaKe  ridges,  Bellascintilla  ap- 
pears to  be  more  closely  related  to  Vasconiella  than  to 
either  Tryphomyax  or  Divariscintilla,  despite  the  dif- 
ferences of  shell  shape,  hinge  teeth,  and  zoogeography. 

Tlie  hinge  of  Bellascintilla  has  some  features  in  com- 
mon with  the  family  Leptonidae  (iray,  1S47  (e.g.,  cime- 


iform  cardinal  teeth),  and  could  conceivably  be  a  prim- 
itive member  of  either  family.  It  is  therefore  w  ith  some 
misgivings  that  1  place  Bellascintilla  in  the  Galeom- 
matidae.  A  clearer  understanding  of  systematic  relation- 
ships within  the  Galeommatacea  w  ill  result  when  more 
information  concerning  the  anatomy  and  shell  ultrastruc- 
ture of  many  of  the  genera  becomes  available.  Because 
the  definitions  of  the  families  in  the  Galeommatacea  are 
not  yet  clarified  (Ponder,  1971;  Bernard,  1975),  and  in 
part  because  the  anatomy  and  biology  of  Bellascintilla 
and  Tryphomyax  are  unknow  n,  the  relationships  of  these 
four  genera  are  subject  to  change  as  additional  data  be- 
comes available. 

I  recognize  a  single  species  of  Divariscintilla,  the  type 
species  D.  maoria.  The  two  species  described  as  Divar- 
iscintilla yoyo  and  D.  troglodytes  b\  Mikkelsen  and  Bie- 
ler  (1989)  are  reassigned  here  to  the  genus  Phlyctae- 
nachlamys  Popham,  1939.  They  share  with  P. 
lysiusquillina  Popham,  1939,  the  type  species  of  Phlyc- 
taenachlamys,  major  conchological  characters,  including 
the  unnotched  ventral  shell  margin,  hinge  teeth  and  lig- 
ament morphology,  shell  ultrastructure,  and  anatomical 
characters  including  an  internal  shell,  mantle  morphol- 
ogy, and  ctenidial  morphologv  (see  Mikkelsen  &  Bieler, 
1989;  Popham,  1939).  As  in  Phlyctaenachlamys  lysios- 
quillina,  P.  yoyo  and  P.  troglodytes  have  shells  that  are 
equivalve,  inequilateral,  oval,  flattened,  and  roundK 
elongate  anteriorK  The  hinge  teeth  and  ligament  are 
remarkably  similar  between  the  three  species  of  Phlyc- 
taenachlamys, but  are  quite  different  than  those  of  Di- 
variscintilla maoria  Powell  and  BellascirUilla  parma- 
leeana.  The  shell  ultrastructure  of  Phlyctaenachlamys 
lysiosquillina  is  unknown.  Mikkelsen  and  Bieler  (1989) 
illustrate  and  describe  the  shell  ultrastructure  of  P.  ijoyo 
and  P.  troglodytes  as  "cross-lamellar,  with  thin  homo- 
geneous layer  on  either  side".  This  is  somew  hat  similar 
to  the  ultrastructural  arrangement  of  Vasconiella  and  of 
Bellascintilla,  but  is  very  different  from  the  ultrastruc- 
tural arrangement  of  Divariscintilla,  and  even  more  so 
from  that  of  Tryphomyax.  The  shell  of  Phlyctaenach- 
lamys hjsiosqiiillina  is  internal  (Popham,  1939),  as  it  is 
in  P.  yoyo  and  P.  troglodytes  (Mikkelsen  and  Bieler, 
1989).  Only  the  anterior  and  posterio-dorsal  margins  of 
Divariscintilla  maoria  are  covered  by  the  mantle  (Judd, 
1971).  The  number  and  placement  of  mantle  tentacles 
and  defensive  appendages  is  strongly  similar  between  P. 
lysiosquillina  and  those  of  P.  yoyo  and  P.  troglodytes 
(see  Mikkelsen  &  Bieler,  1989;  Popham,  1939).  There 
are  two  primary  anterior  tentacles  in  P.  lysiosquillina, 
P.  yoyo  and  P.  troglodytes  as  illustrated  by  Popham 
(1939)  and  by  Mikkelsen  and  Bieler  (1989),  although  P. 
troglodytes  has  a  .second  set  of  short  anterior  tentacles. 
Divariscintilla  maoria  has  6  to  8  large  defensive  ap- 
pendages (Mikkelsen  &  Bieler,  1989)  or  posterior  ap- 
pendages (Popham,  1939),  which  are  absent  from  P. 
lysiosquillina,  P.  yoyo  and  P.  troglodytes.  The  ctenidia, 
usually  an  important  source  of  ph\  logenetic  information, 
are  smooth  in  Divarisciiitilla  maoria,  but  pleated  in  P. 
lysiosquillina  (Popham,   1939)  and  in  P.   yoyo  and  P. 


C.  C.  Conev.  1990 


Page  143 


troglodytes  (Mikkelsen  &  Bieler,  1989).  The  unusual 
"flower-like"  organ  of  Divariscintilla  maoria  and  those 
discovered  in  P.  ijoyo  and  P.  troglodytes  by  Mikkelsen 
and  Bieler  (1989),  were  not  reported  by  Popham  (1939). 
Whether  these  "flower-like"  organs  were  overlooked  in 
P.  lysiosquillina.  or  simply  do  not  exist  in  this  species,  is 
unknown. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

For  loans  of  specimens  of  Divariscintilla  maoria  and 
Vasconiella  jeffreysiana  I  thank  Bruce  A.  Marshall 
(NMNZ)  and  Anders  Waren  (SMNH),  respectively.  I  also 
appreciate  the  help  of  Silvard  P.  Kool,  Museum  of  Com- 
parative Zoology,  Harvard,  and  Lindsey  T.  Groves 
(LACM)  in  locating  obscure  literature.  Pedro  Baez,  Luis 
Bracamontes,  and  Elizabet  Ramos  (LACM)  kindK  pro- 
vided translations  of  the  foreign  literature.  John  DeLeon, 
Dick  Meier,  and  Don  Meyer,  LACM  photography  staff, 
made  prints  from  SEM  negatives.  Special  appreciation 
is  expressed  to  Jack  Worrall,  Alicia  Thompson,  and  Rob- 
ert F.  Bils  of  the  Center  for  Electron  Microscopy  and 
Microanalysis,  University  of  Southern  California,  for 
helpful  advice  on  the  use  of  the  Cambridge  360  scanning 
electron  microscope.  James  H.  McLean  (LACM)  kindly 
provided  guidance  and  constructi\'e  suggestions  through- 
out the  preparation  of  the  manuscript.  I  also  appreciate 
the  very  helpful  reviews  provided  by  Eugene  V.  Coan, 
LACM  Research  Associate,  Robert  S.  Presant,  Indiana 
I'niversity  of  Pennsylvania,  LouElla  Saul  (LACM),  and 
two  anonvmous  reviewers. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Aartsen,  J.  J.  van.  197.5.  Nogmaals  Vasconiella  jeffreysiana 
(P.  Fischer)  (uit  Bretagne,  Algeciras  en  Algerije),  Corres- 
pondentie  Blad  Nederlandse  Maiacologische  N'ereniging 
167;466-467. 

.'\artsen,  J.  J.  van.  1982.  European  marine  Mollu.sea:  notes  on 
less  well-known  species  IV.  Vasconiella  jeffreysiana  (P 
Fischer,  1873).  Basteria  4frl25-12H 

Bernard,  F.  R  197.5.  Rhamphidonia  gen  n  from  Xortii- 
eastern  Pacific  (Bivalvia,  Leptonacea).  Journal  de  Con- 
chyliologie  112:105-115. 

Bernard,  F.  R.  1983.  Catalogue  of  the  li\ iiig  BuaK ia  of  the 
Eastern  Pacific  Ocean:  Bering  Strait  to  C^ape  Horn  Ca- 
nadian Special  Publication  of  Fisheries  and  .\quatic  Sci- 
ences 61:1-102. 

Berr\ ,  S.  S.  19.59.  Notices  of  New  Eastern  Pacific  MolUisca — 
III.  Leaflets  in  Malacology  1(  IS):  107-1 14. 

Bouchel,  P.,  F.  Danrigal,  and  C  Hii\  ghens  1978.  Coquillages 
des  Cotes  atlantiques  et  de  la  Manche  Eilitons  du  Paci- 
fique,  Paris,  144  p. 

Bruggeman-Nannenga.  M.  \-  1975.  .\  iKirtluTU  extension  of 
the  known  distribution  of  the  bivalve  Vasconiella  jeffre- 
siana  (P.  Fischer,  1873)  (Galeomatidae)  [sic].  Basteria  39: 
14. 

Carter,  J.  G,  and  (;.  R.  C;lark.  1985.  Classification  and  pli\- 
iogenetic  significance  of  niolluscan  shell  microstructure. 
//!.  Bottjer,  b.  J  ,  C.  S  Hickman,  and  P  D.  Ward  (eds.). 
Mollusks:  notes  for  a  short  course.  L  niversit)  of  Tennessee, 
Studies  in  Geology  13,  p.  .50-71. 


Cluivan,  A,  1969.  Supcrlaniib  l.cplonaiea  Gra\.  IS47.  In: 
Moore,  R.  C.  (ed.).  Treatise  on  invertebrate  paleontolog\. 
Part  N.  Mollu.scaf).  Bivalvia  2.  (ieologicalSocietvoi  Amer- 
ica (Boulder,  Colorado)  &  I  ni\crslly  of  Kansas  (Law- 
rence), p.  518-537. 

Cornet.  M.  1982.  Anatomical  descrii)tion  of  \'asconi(7/a /c/- 
frcysiana  (P.  Fischer,  1873)  (Mollirsca,  Bivalvia,  Leptona- 
cea! Journal  of  Mollu.scan  Studies  48:36-43. 

C<>\,  L.  R,  1969.  General  features  of  Bivalvia.  In:  Moore,  R. 
C.  (ed.)  Treatise  on  iiuertebrate  paleontology.  Part  \. 
Mollusca  6.  Bivalvia  1  Geological  Society  of  .America 
(Boulder,  C^olorado)  &  L'niversitv  of  Kansas  (Lawrence) 
p.  2-129. 

Dall,  W.  H.  1899.  Synopsis  of  the  Recent  and  Tertiary  Lep- 
tonacea of  North  .America  and  the  West  Indies.  Proceed- 
ings of  the  I'nited  States  National  Mu.seum  21:873-897,  2 
pis. 

Dekker,  N.  1975.  Nogmaals  Vasconiella  jeffreysiana  (P.  Fi- 
scher). Correspondentie  Blad  Nederlandse  Maiacologische 
Verniging  167:466. 

Fischer.  P.  1873.  In:  de  Foliii,  L  Exploration  dc  la  losse  de 
Cap-Breton  en  1872.  Les  Fonds  de  la  Mer  2  65-84 

Fischer,  P.  1874.  Faune  conchyliologique  marine  du  departe- 
iiient  de  la  Gironde  et  de  cotes  du  Sud-Ouest  de  la  France. 
Deuxieme  supplement.  Actes  de  la  Societe  Linneenne  de 
Bordeaux  29:193-255. 

Fischer.  P.  1878.  Essai  sur  la  distribution  geographi<iiie  des 
Brachiopodes  et  des  Mollusques  du  littoral  oceanique  de 
la  France  .Actes  de  la  Societe  Linneenne  de  Bordeaux  32: 
171-215. 

Fischer,  P.  1887.  Manuel  de  Conchy liologie  et  de  Paleonto- 
logie  conchyliologique.  F   Savy,  Paris,  1369  p.,  23  pis. 

de  Folin,  L.  and  L.  Perier  1878.  Notice  sur  Les  Fonds  de  la 
Mer.  Memoires  de  la  Societe  des  Sciences  Physiques  et 
Naturelles  de  Bordeaux  2:323-357. 

Franc,  A.  1960.  Classe  des  Bivalves.  /;j;  Grasse,  P  P  (ed. ). 
Traite  de  Zoologie  5:1845-21.33 

Hertz,  C.  M.  1984.  Illustration  of  the  t\pes  named  by  S. 
Stillman  Berr\  in  his  "Leaflets  in  Malacology  .  The  Fes- 
tivus  15,  Supplement:  1-42 

Hildalgo,  J.  G.  1917.  Fauna  maiacologica  de  Espana.  Portugal 
\  las  Baleares  Moluscos  testaceos  marinos.  Madrid,  Tra- 
liajos  del  Museo  National  de  Ciencias  Naturales  Serie  Zoo- 
logica  30:1-752. 

Judd.  W.  1971.  The  structure  and  habits  of  Divariscintilla 
maoria  Powell  (Bi\alvia:  Galeommatidae).  Proceedings  of 
the  Malacological  .Societ)  of  London  .39:343-.)54 

Keen,  A.  M.  1971.  Sea  Shells  of  Tropical  West  .America. 
(Second  Ed)  Stanford  I'niversity  Press,  Stanford.  (;.A  xiv 
-I-  1064  p. 

Kisch,  B  S  1958  Vasconiella  jeffreysiana  (P.  Fischer).  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Malacological  Societ\  of  London  ■33(  1  ):21- 
24 

Mienis,  H,  K  1975,  Vasconiella  jeffreysiana  (P.  Fischer)  in 
de  Golf  van  Biskaje.  C;orrespondcnli('  Blad  Nederlandse 
Maiacologische  Wreniging  166:4.)1 

Mienis,  H.K.  1976.  Vasconiella  jeffreysiana  (P.  Fisclier)  ook 
van  Quiberon.  Correspondentie  Blad  Nederlandse  Mala- 
cologisclie  Vereniging  169:522. 

Mikkelsen,  P  M  and  R.  Bieler  1989.  Biology  and  compar- 
ative analonn  of  Divariscintilla  yoyo  .hkI  D.  tropfodytcs. 
two  new  species  of  (iaieommatidae  (Bivalvia)  from  sto- 
niatopod  burrows  in  eastern  Florida  Malacologia  31(1): 
17.5-195. 


Page  144 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104,  No.  4 


Montero  Aguera.  I.  1971.  MoiiLstos  l)ivaKi)sc.spaiiole.s,  Publi- 
caciones  de  la  Liiixcrsidad  de  Si'\illa  .ol-'l'JS. 

Morion,  B.  197,5.  D>iiiaiitic  cli.splax  in  (Jalcomma  polita  Dc- 
slia\t'S  (Bivalvia:  Lcptonacea).  Jcuirnal  ol  ( ^onchdlogy  28: 
365-369. 

Morton,  B.  1976.  Secondary  brooding  of  temporary  dwarf 
male.s  in  Ephippodonta  [Ephippodontina)  oedipus  sp.  nov. 
(Bivalvia:  Leptonacea).  journal  of  Conchology  29:31-39. 

Nordsleck,  F.  1969.  Die  europaisclien  Meeresnuischeln  (Bi- 
valvia). Voni  Eismeer  bi.s  Kapverden,  Mittelmeer  und 
Schwarzes  Meer,  Stiittsiart 

Olsson,  A.  A.  1961.  Mollusks  (it  the  tropical  eastern  Pacific, 
particularly  from  the  .southern  half  of  the  Panamic-Pacific 
faunal  province  (Panama  to  Peru):  Panamic-Pacific  Pele- 
c\poda.  Paleontological  Research  Institution.  Ithaca,  NY, 
574  p.,  86  pis. 

Pasteur-Humbert,  C.  1962.  Les  Mollusques  inarins  testaces 
du  Maroc  II  Les  Lamellibranches  et  les  .Scaphopodes.  Tra- 
vaux  de  I'lnstitut  Scientifique  Cherifien,  Serie  Zoologie  28: 
1-184. 

Ponder,  W.  F.  1971.  Some  New  Zealand  and  Suhaiilarctic 
bivalves  of  the  Cyamiacea  and  Leptonacea  with  descrip- 
tion of  new  taxa.  Records  of  the  Dominion  Museum  7: 
119-141 

Popham,  M.  L.  1939  On  Pldyciacnachlamys  lysiosquillina 
gen.  and  sp.  no\.,  a  lamellihranch  commensal  in  the  bur- 
rows of  I^ysiosqiiillii  ruaciildta.  British  Museimi  (Natural 


History),  Great  Barrier  Reef  Ivxpedition  1928-29,  Scien- 
tific Reports  6(2):61-84. 

Powell.  \.  B.  VV.  1932  On  some  New  Zealand  pelec>  pods. 
Proceedings  ot  the  Malacological  Societx  of  London  20: 
65-72,  pi.  6. 

Powell,  A.  B.  W.  1962.  Shells  of  New  Zealand:  an  illustrated 
handbook,  4th  ed.  Whitcombe  and  Tombs  Ltd.,  Christ- 
church,  203  p.,  .35  pis 

Powell,  A,  B.  \V,  1976  Shells  of  New  Zealand:  an  illustrated 
handbook,  5th  ed.  Whitcoulls  Publishers,  Christchurch. 
154  p..  45  pis 

Scarlato,  O.  A.  and  V  I  Starobogatov.  1979.  General  evo- 
lutionary patterns  and  the  s\stem  of  the  class  Bivalvia, 
Proceedings  of  the  Zoological  Institute  of  the  .-Kcadeni)  of 
Sciences  of  the  USSR  80:5-38. 

Taylor,  J.  D.,  W.  J.  Kennedy,  and  A.  Hall.  1973.  The  shell 
structure  and  mineralogy  of  the  Bivalvia:  II.  Lucinacea — 
Clavagellacea  conclusions.  Bulletin  of  the  British  Museum 
(Natural  History)  22(9):253-294,  15  pis. 

X'erduin.  .\.  1975,  Vasconiella  jejfrcysiana  (P.  Fi.scher)  ook 
van  ,\gadir,  Correspondentie  Blad  Nederlandse  Malacolo- 
gische  V'ereniging  166:422, 

Waren,  A.  1980.  Marine  Mollusca  described  b\  John  G\\\n 
Jeffreys,  with  the  location  of  the  type  material.  Concho- 
logical  Society  of  Great  Britain  and  Ireland,  Special  Pub- 
lication 1:1-60, 


THE  NAUTILUS  104     (4):  145-146,  1990 


Page  145 


Malacology  or  Conchology? 


Robert  Robertson 

Department  ot  Malacology 
Acadeni)  of  Natural  Sciences 
Nineteenth  and  the  Parkway 
Philadelphia,  P.\  19103,  USA 


The  choice  of  which  of  these  two  words  to  use  depends 
not,  as  one  might  suppose,  on  etymology,  priority,  or  the 
original  intentions  of  the  proposers,  but  on  usage  (and 
emotions!).  The  purposes  of  the  present  paper  are  to 
elaborate  on  these  ideas,  to  record  some  apparently  new 
insights  on  this  old  polemic,  and  to  advocate  use  of  mal- 
acology. This  paper  does  not  concern  the  pros  and  cons 
of  studying  living  animals  or  shells. 

The  two  competing  terms  for  the  stud\  of  the  ph\  lum 
Mollusca  are  malacology  and  conchology.  To  most  mod- 
ern biologists,  malacology  means  the  study  of  molluscan 
animals  (soft  bodies  plus  shells  if  present)  and  conchology 
means  the  study  of  just  their  shells.  The  Greek  word 
malakos  and  the  Latin  word  molluscus  apparently  are 
not  cognates,  although  they  both  mean  soft.  The  Greek 
konche  means  either  snail  or  shell  (whence  the  English 
conch).  In  two  editions  of  an  excellent,  scholarly  book 
on  the  histor\  of  shell  collecting,  S.  Peter  Dance  (1966, 
1986)  has  favored  conchology  for  the  study  of  whole 
mollusks.  Dance  quotes  various  authors  to  show  that 
konche  and  its  diminutive  konchijlion  could  mean  a  shell- 
bearing  mollusk,  not  only  its  shell.  I  give  reasons  here 
for  favoring  the  term  malacology,  in  answer  to  Dance 
(1966,  1986). 

The  polarity  is  deep-seated.  In  the  United  States  there 
are  the  American  Malacological  Union  and  the  Con- 
chologists  of  America.  In  the  British  Isles  there  are  the 
Malacological  Society  of  London  and  the  Conchological 
Society  of  Great  Britain  and  Ireland,  etc. 

The  word  conchyliologie,  anglicized  to  conchology  by 
da  Costa  (1776),  was  introduced  in  1742  by  the  aristo- 
cratic cabinet  naturalist  Antoine  Joseph  Dezallier  [or  De- 
sallier]  d'Argenville  in  the  book  L'Histoire  Naturelle 
eclaircie  dans  deux  de  ses  parties  principales,  la  Lith- 
ologie  et  la  Conchyliologie,  dent  I'une  traite  des  Pierres 
et  I'autre  des  Coquillages  (Paris).  The  book  primarily 
concerns  minerals,  fossils,  and  shells.  D'Argenville  de- 
fined concha  and  coquillage  as  an  animal  with  a  shell 
("coquille  ")  plus  its  contained  soft  body  or  "fish"  ("pois- 
son").  E.xpressly  excluded  from  the  book  are  most  "mol- 
lusca, which  to  him  meant  soft-bodied  animals  without 
shells.  Curiously,  d'Argenville  illustrated  six  terrestrial 
slugs.  There  are  also,  besides  molluscan  shells,  illustra- 
tions of  echinoids,  barnacles,  organ-pipe  coral  (Tubi- 


pora),  serpulid  worms,  etc.  There  were  no  illustrations 
of  chitons,  octopuses,  squids,  or  cuttlebones. 

The  word  malacologie.  also  French  and  anglicized  in 
1836  to  malacology  and  apparently  a  contraction  of  mal- 
acozoologie,  was  one  of  two  terms  introduced  in  1814, 
72  years  after  d'Argenville,  by  the  controversial  and  per- 
haps brilliant  field  naturalist  Constantine  Samuel  Schmaltz 
Rafinesque.  He  meant  by  the  term  the  study  of  "Mol- 
lusques"  as  he  understood  them  ("Classe  \ialacosia"). 
His  second  word,  anopologie,  was  for  a  broader  study. 
(One  wonders  how  serious  he  was.)  Rafinesque  had  no 
companion  term  for  the  shell  bearers  (or  Conchifera).  It 
is  likeK  that  Rafinesque  had  more-or-less  the  same  con- 
cept of  "Mollusques  "  as  Cuvier  (1817),  who  included 
chitons  and  cephalopods  in  the  group,  but  also  ascidians, 
brachiopods  and  cirripedes.  Characteristically,  Rafin- 
esque proposed  malacologie  in  a  now-ver\  -rare  booklet, 
this  one  verboseK  entitled  Principes  Fondamentaux  de 
Somiologie  ou  les  Loix  de  la  Nomenclature  et  de  la 
Classification  de  I'Empire  Organique  ou  des  Animaux 
et  des  vegetaux  contenant  les  Regies  essentielles  de  I'Art 
de  leur  imposer  des  noms  immuahles  et  de  les  classer 
methodiquemen  t  ( Palermo). 

H.  M.  D  de  Blainville  (1825),  in  the  text  of  his  Manuel 
de  Malacologie  et  de  Conchyliologie  (Paris  and  Stras- 
bourg), did  much  to  disseminate  the  word  malacologie 
and  to  bring  about  use  of  the  two  terms  in  modern  times. 
In  two  ways,  de  Blainville  showed  his  preference  for 
malacologie:  his  use  of  the  two  typefaces,  and  his  stating 
that  malacologie  is  a  part  of  zoologv'  while  conchyliologie 
is  an  "art"  (title  page). 

Both  terms  were  proposed  before  the  modern  phylum 
Mollusca  was  conceptualized.  But  let  us  not  have  a  new- 
term!  (testaceology,  the  study  of  shells,  and  molluscologie 
are  alreadv  extinct). 

D'Argenville  was  pre-Linnaean,  but  the  binomial  no- 
menclatural  rule  of  prioritv  is  liardK  t)perative.  Original 
intentions  and  etymology  seem  more  relevant,  but  un- 
fortunately do  not  pertain.  The  first  s\  llables  of  mo/lusk 
and  Mia/acology  are  convenientK-  similar.  Quite  prop- 
erly, malacozoologv  had  been  part  of  zoologx .  .Also,  soft- 
ness is  common  to  the  bodies  of  all  mollusks,  while  shells 
are  not.  Rafinesque  came  closer  to  the  modern  concept 
of  the  Mollusca  than  d'Argenville.  who  (as  shown  above) 


Page  146 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  104     ,  No.  4 


Figure  1.  Constantine  Samuel  Schmaltz  Rafinesque  (1783- 
1840),  who  proposed  the  term  malacologie  in  1814.  The  au- 
thenticity of  this  portrait  has  been  questioned  (LaRocque,  1964). 


Figure  2.  Antoine  Joseph  Dezallier  d'Argenville  (1680-1765), 
who  proposed  the  term  conchyliologie  in  1742.  From  the  en- 
graving in  Favanne  and  Favanne  (1780). 


grouped  in  it  a  variety  of  shelly  animals.  In  a  later  pub- 
lication, Rafinesque  did  include  cephalopods  in  his  Mol- 
lusques.  It  is  admitted  that  these  are  slender  arguments 
for  malacology.  But  is  the  case  for  conchologij  any  better? 
Even  though  to  an  ancient  Greek  malacologia  might  have 
meant  a  discourse  on  anything  soft,  to  me,  a  biologist, 
the  term  malacology  is  preferable  to  conchology  for  the 
modern  branch  of  zoology  concerning  mollusks.  How- 
ever, the  dual  usage  no  doubt  will  continue. 

I  thank  Professor  A.  J.  Cain  (via  Dr.  A.  E.  Bogan)  for 
bringing  to  my  attention  Rafinesque's  apology. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Costa,  E.  M,  da.  1776.  Elements  of  conchology:  or,  an  intro- 
duction to  the  knowledge  of  shells.  London,  p  i-viii  -I-  1- 
318,  7  pis. 


Cuvier,  [G.  L.  C.  F.  D.].  1817.  Memoires  pour  servir  a  I'His- 
toire  et  a  I'Anatomie  des  Mollusques.  Paris.  Pagination 
comple.x,  ca.  38  pis.  Most  originally  in  .Annales  du  Museum 
d'Histoire  Naturelle  [Paris],  beginning  1802. 

Dance,  S.  P.  1966.  Shell  collecting;  an  illustrated  history. 
Faber  &  Faber,  London  or  University  of  California,  Berke- 
ley, p.  1-344,  35  pis. 

Dance,  S.  P.  1986.  A  history  of  shell  collecting.  Revised  ed. 
of  above.  E.  J.  Brill/Dr.  W.  Backhuys,  Leiden,  p.  i-xv  + 
1-265,  col,  frontispiece  +  32  pis 

Favanne,  J.  de  and  J.  G  de  Favanne  1780.  La  Conchylio- 
logie, ou  Histoire  Naturelle  des  Coquilles.  .  .  .  [ed,  3  of 
d'Argenville's  Conch\  liologie],  Paris,  3  vols, 

LaRocque,  A.  1964.  .\  Rafinesque  portrait.  Sterkiana  16:1-2, 
Ipl 


INSTRUCTIONS  TO  AUTHORS 


THE  NAUTILUS  publishes  papers  on  all  aspects  of  the 
biology  and  systematics  of  mollusks.  Manuscripts  de- 
scribing original,  unpublished  research  as  well  as  review 
articles  will  be  considered.  Brief  articles,  not  exceeding 
1000  words,  will  be  published  as  notes  and  do  not  re- 
quire an  abstract.  Notices  of  meetings  and  other  items 
of  interest  to  malacologists  will  appear  in  a  news  and 
notices  section. 

Manuscripts:  Each  original  manuscript  and  accompa- 
nying illustrations  should  be  submitted  in  triplicate.  Text 
must  be  typed  on  one  side  of  S'^  x  11  inch  white  paper, 
double  spaced  throughout  (including  literature  cited,  ta- 
bles and  figure  captions),  with  at  least  1  inch  of  margin 
on  all  sides.  All  pages  must  be  numbered  consecutively. 
If  printed  on  a  word  processor,  the  right  margin  should 
be  ragged  rather  than  justified.  Authors  should  follow 
the  recommendations  of  the  Council  of  Biology  Editors 
Style  Manual,  which  is  available  from  the  Council  of 
Biology  Editors,  Inc.,  9650  Rockville  Pike,  Bethesda,  MD 
20814,  U.S.A.  The  first  mention  of  a  scientific  name  in 
the  text  .should  be  accompanied  by  the  taxonomic  au- 
thority, including  year.  Latin  names  and  words  to  be 
printed  in  italics  must  be  underlined;  leave  other  indi- 
cations to  the  editor.  Metric  and  Celsius  units  are  to  be 
used. 

The  sequence  of  sections  should  be:  title  page,  abstract 
page,  introduction,  materials  and  methods,  results,  dis- 
cussion, acknowledgements,  literature  cited,  tables,  fig- 
ure captions,  figures.  The  title  page  should  include  the 
title,  author's  name(s)  and  address(es).  The  abstract  page 
should  contain  the  title  and  abstract,  which  should  sum- 
marize in  250  words  or  less  the  scope,  main  results  and 
conclusions  of  the  paper.  The  abstract  may  be  followed 
by  a  maximum  of  8  key  words.  All  references  cited  in 
the  text  must  appear  in  the  literature  cited  section  and 
vice  versa.  In  the  literature  cited  section,  all  authors 
must  be  fully  identified  and  listed  alphabeticallv.  Follow 
a  recent  issue  of  THE  NAUTILUS  for  bibliographic  style, 
noting  that  journal  titles  must  be  unabbreviated.  Infor- 
mation on  plates  and  figures  should  be  cited  only  if  not 
included  in  the  pagination.  Tables  must  be  numbered 
and  each  placed  on  a  separate  sheet.  A  brief  legend  must 
accompany  each  table.  Captions  for  each  group  of  illus- 
trations should  be  typed  on  a  separate  sheet  and  include 
a  key  to  all  lettered  labeling  appearing  in  that  group  of 
illustrations. 


All  line  drawings  must  be  in  black,  high  quality  ink, 
clearly  detailed  and  completely  labeled.  Photographs 
must  be  on  glossy,  high  contrast  paper.  All  figures  are 
to  be  consecutively  numbered  (figs.  1,  2,  3,  ...  ,  NOT 
figs.  la.  lb,  Ic,  .  .  .  NOR  plate  1,  fig.  1  .  .  .).  Illustrations 
must  be  arranged  in  proportions  that  will  conform  with 
the  width  of  a  page  (6%  inches  or  171  mm)  or  a  column 
(SVi  inches  or  82  mm).  The  maximum  size  of  a  printed 
figure  is  6¥4  by  9  inches  or  171  by  228  mm.  A\\  illus- 
trations must  be  fully  cropped,  mounted  on  a  firm,  white 
backing,  numbered,  labeled  and  camera  ready.  The  au- 
thor's name,  paper  title  and  figure  number(s)  should  ap- 
pear on  the  back.  Original  illustrations  must  be  between 
one  and  two  times  the  desired  final  size.  It  is  the  author's 
responsibility  that  the  line  weight  and  lettering  are  ap- 
propriate for  the  desired  reduction.  Original  illustrations 
will  be  returned  to  the  author  if  requested.  Color  illus- 
trations can  be  included  at  extra  cost  to  the  author. 

Voucher  Material:  Deposition  of  type  material  in  a 
recognized  public  museum  is  a  requirement  for  publi- 
cation of  papers  in  which  new  species  are  described. 
Deposition  of  representative  voucher  specimens  in  such 
institutions  is  strongly  encouraged  for  all  other  types  of 
research  papers. 

Processing  of  Manuscripts:  Upon  receipt,  every  manu- 
script is  acknowledged  and  sent  for  critical  review  by  at 
least  two  referees.  These  reviews  serve  as  the  basis  for 
acceptance  or  rejection.  Accepted  manuscripts  are  re- 
turned to  the  author  for  consideration  of  the  reviewers' 
comments.  A  finalized  version  of  the  manuscript  is  re- 
turned to  the  editor  and  sent  to  press.  Two  sets  of  proofs 
are  sent  to  the  author  for  correction.  Changes  other  than 
typesetting  errors  will  be  charged  to  the  author  at  cost. 
One  set  of  corrected  proofs  should  be  sent  to  the  editor 
as  soon  as  possible.  Authors  with  institutional,  grant  or 
other  research  support  will  be  billed  for  page  charges  at 
the  rate  of  $60.00  per  printed  page. 

An  order  form  for  reprints  will  accompany  the  proofs. 
Reprints  may  be  ordered  through  the  editor. 

Manuscripts,  corrected  proofs  and  correspondence  re- 
garding editorial  matters  should  be  sent  to:  Dr.  M.G. 
Harasewych,  Editor,  Division  of  Mollusks,  NHB  stop  118, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  In- 
stitution, Washington,  DC  20560,  USA. 


THIS  PUBLICATION  IS  PRINTED  ON  ACID-FREE  PAPER.