Skip to main content

Full text of "A new Pareumys (Rodentia: cylindrodontidae) from the Duchesne River Formation, Utah"

See other formats


mi 


LIBRARY  OF  THE 

UNIVERSITY  OF  ILLINOIS 

AT  URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 


2 


5603 
FI 
V.I6 


y 


Ul^lVEHSlTY  OF 

ItltNOlS  LIBRARY 

AT  URSANA-CHAMPAIGN 

GEaOGY 


trfitl^swH^Vn  on  or  before  the 
Latest  Date  stamped  below. 

Theft  mutilation,  and  underlining  of  books 
are  ;a"ons  for  disciplinary  action  and  may 
^esu  t  in  dismissal  from  the  Un.vers.ty. 


L161  — O-1096 


/ 


FIELDIANA   .   GEOLOGY 

Published  by 
FIELD    MUSEUM    OF    NATURAL    HISTORY 


Volume  16  May  26,  1970  No.  17 


A  New  Pai'euviys  (Rodentia:  Cylindrodontidae) 
from  the  Duchesne  River  Formation,  Utah 

Craig  C.  Black 

Carnegie  Museum,  Pittsburgh  ' 

INTRODUCTION 

During  the  summer  of  1968,  Dr.  John  Clark  and  Mr.  Orville  Gil- 
pin of  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History  fFMNH)  and  their  assist- 
ant. Mr.  Tom  Guensburg,  collected  in  the  Duchesne  River  Formation 
west  of  Vernal.  Utah.  Fossil  mammals  are  quite  rare  in  this  unit 
(see  faunal  list.  Black  and  Dawson.  1966.  pp.  334  337)  particularly 
from  the  middle  and  upper,  or  Halfway  and  La  Point  Members 
(Kay.  1934).  They  were  quite  fortunate,  therefore,  in  finding  a 
number  of  mammalian  specimens  in  the  La  Point  Member,  including 
the  two  jaws  described  here  as  a  new^  species  of  the  genus  Pareumys, 
a  genus  previously  known  only  from  the  Uintan. 

It  has  generally  been  recognized  that  there  is  a  considerable  dif- 
ference between  the  fauna  of  the  Randlett  Member  at  the  base  of 
the  Duchesne  River  Formation  and  that  from  the  La  Point  Member 
at  the  top.  The  fauna  from  the  Randlett  Member  bears  resemblance 
to  the  Myton  fauna  which  occurs  stratigraphically  below  it  (Black 
and  Dawson.  1966).  The  fauna  from  the  La  Point  Member  is  not  as 
well  known  as  that  from  the  Randlett  but  it  has  few  genera  in  com- 
mon with  the  fauna  from  the  upper  part  of  the  Uinta  Formation. 
It  should  be  emphasized,  however,  that  the  La  Point  Member  fauna 
also  shows  little  resemblance  to  faunas  from  the  Chadron  Formation 
in  Nebraska,  South  Dakota,  and  Montana.  At  the  present  time, 
there  is  some  controversy  over  the  age  of  faunas  from  the  Duchesne 
River  Formation  and  the  correlation  of  these  faunas  with  others  in 
Texas  and  California  (Black  and  Dawson.  1966;  Clark  et  al.,  1967; 
Wilson  et  al.,  1968).  This  confusion  stems,  in  part,  from  an  inade- 
quate knowledge  of  the  mammals  from  the  Duchesne  River  Forma- 
tion and  the  precise  stratigi-aphic  position  of  specimens  already  de- 
scribed. 

•Present  address:  Museum  of  Natural  History,  University  of  Kansas. 

Library  of  Congress  Catalog  Card  Number:  76-12U571 

Publication  1097  453  The  Libr 

MAY  15 

GEOLOGY  LIBRARr'"™'  '= 


454  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  16 

Family  Cylindrodontidae 
Genus  Pareumys  Peterson,  1919 

Pareumys  guensburgi^  n.  sp. 

Figures  1,  2 

Type.— FMNR  PM  14978,  left  mandible  with  P4-M3. 

Hypodigm.— Type  and  FMNH  PM  14979,  left  mandible  with  M2. 

Horizon  and  Locality. — Duchesne  River  Formation,  La  Point 
Member,  Late  Eocene,  SE  I4  sec.  23.  T.  4  S.,  R.  19  E.,  SLM,  Uintah 
Co.,  Utah. 

Diagnosis. — Largest  species  of  genus;  jaw  massive  as  in  Cylindro- 
don:  P3-M3  higher  crowned  than  in  Pareumys  grangeri  and  P.  milleri; 
P4  reduced,  smallest  tooth  of  series;  Mj  M3  present  three-lophed  con- 
dition after  slight  wear;  hypolophid  joins  ectolophid;  posterolophid 
as  strong  as  hypolophid. 

Description. — There  is  considerable  difference  in  size  between  the 
two  mandibles  here  referred  to  Pareumys  guenshurgi.  Nevertheless, 
they  are  considered  to  represent  the  same  species  because  the  M2  in 
the  smaller  jaw  is  so  nearly  identical  in  size  and  structure  to  that  of 
the  type.  In  addition,  the  incisor  structure  is  the  same  in  each  speci- 
men although  the  incisor  in  the  type  is  larger  than  that  in  PM  14979. 
Morphologically,  the  two  mandibles  are  identical. 

The  masseteric  fossa  ends  sharply  below  the  posterior  end  of  M2 
(fig.  2C)  with  the  ventral  masseteric  ridge  carried  forward  in  a  thick 
knob  below  the  middle  of  M2.  There  is  only  a  single  mental  foramen 
just  anterior  to  and  below  P4  in  PM  14979.  In  PM  14978,  this  area 
has  been  destroyed. 

The  lower  cheek  teeth  of  P.  guenshurgi  are  higher  crowned  than 
those  of  any  other  species  of  Pareumys.  In  this  respect  they  parallel 
the  condition  seen  in  Pseudocylindrodon.  This  increase  in  crown 
height  is  mostly  effected  through  increase  in  the  height  of  the  ringing 
enamel  of  the  teeth  without  an  increase  in  the  depth  of  the  occlusal 
pattern.  The  crown  pattern  is  thus  lost  after  moderate  wear  even 
though  the  teeth  still  retain  a  considerable  height  of  crown.  This 
approach  to  hypsodonty  is  carried  further  in  Cylindrodon  and  is  quite 
different  from  the  hypsodonty  seen  in  mylagaulids  oi'  beavers  where 
the  entire  crown  pattern  shares  in  the  increase  in  crown  height. 

'  Named  for  Tom  Guensburg,  discoverer  of  the  two  specimens. 


BLACK:  NEW  PAREUMYS 


455 


Fig.  1.     Pareumys  guensbergi,  FMNH  PM  14978,  type,  occlusal  view  of  left 
P4-M3,  X  10. 


The  fourth  lower  premolar  is  the  smallest  tooth  of  the  series.  It 
is  almost  circular  in  occlusal  outline  with  the  protoconid  and  meta- 
conid  appearing  as  a  single  cusp  when  worn.  There  is  only  the  slight- 
est indentation  in  the  enamel  on  the  anterior  face  of  P4  to  indicate  a 
separation  of  these  cusps  (fig.  1).  The  hypoconid  buttress  swings 
forward  as  it  does  also  on  Mi  and  M2  and  to  a  lesser  extent  on  M3. 
The  entoconid  crest  is  prominent  on  P4  and  fuses  with  the  posterior 
end  of  the  ectolophid.  The  entoconid  is  set  off  from  the  metaconid 
and  the  posterolophid  until  the  tooth  has  become  extremely  worn. 

The  crown  patterns  of  Mi  and  M2  were  probably  quite  similar 
(figs.  1,  2A),  although  Mi  is  too  heavily  worn  to  be  certain  of  this. 
M2  displays  three  prominent  cross  crests  in  the  type  (PM  14978). 
The  less  worn  M2  in  PM  14979  shows  that  the  anterior  crest  is  com- 
posed of  the  anterior  cingulum  (or  metalophid  I)  plus  a  very  short 
posterior  protoconid  arm  (metalophid  II)  which  does  not  reach  the 
internal  slope  of  the  metaconid.  The  trigonid  basin  is  quite  shallow 
and  opens  into  the  central  basin  of  the  tooth  on  M2  as  it  does  also 
on  Mg.  There  is  no  metastylid  on  M2  or  M3  and  it  was  probably 
absent  on  Mi  as  well.  The  entoconid  on  M2-M3  is  completely  set 
off  from  both  metaconid  and  posterolophid  during  early  wear  stages. 
The  anterior  entoconid  slope  fuses  with  the  posterior  metaconid  slope 
with  moderate  wear  and  then  with  further  wear  the  entoconid  and 
posterolophid  become  joined.  The  posterolophid  is  swollen  on  all 
molars  and  at  early  wear  stages  a  hypoconulid  is  clearly  discernible. 
The  posterior  third  of  M3  is  somewhat  reduced  through  shortening  of 
the  posterolophid. 

The  lower  incisor  is  heavy  and  broadly  triangular  in  cross-section. 
The  anterior  face  of  the  incisor  is  slightly  rounded  with  the  enamel 
overlapping  about  one-third  of  its  lateral  face  and  one-fifth  of  its 
medial  face. 


456  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  16 

Measurements  in  millimeters 


FMNH 

FMNH 

PM  14978 

PM  14979 

P4  -  Ms  occlusal 

9.50 

P4  anteroposterior 

1.90 

transverse  metalophid 

1.50 

transverse  hypolophid 

1.90 

Ml  anteroposterior 

2.30 

transverse  metalophid 

2.10 

transverse  hypolophid 

2.05 

M-.  anteroposterior 

2.60 

2.70 

transverse  metalophid 

2.40 

2.40 

transverse  hypolophid 

2.50 

2.40 

Ms  anteroposterior 

2.40 

transverse  metalophid 

2.50 

transverse  hypolophid 

2.40 

I    anteroposterior 

2.70 

1.90 

transverse 

2.50 

1.70 

Relatiojiships. — The  genus  Pareumys  is  quite  distinct  from  later 
members  of  the  Cyhndrodontidae  and  certainly  could  not  have  been 
ancestral  to  them.  This  view  has  been  expressed  by  Wilson  (1940, 
p.  106)  but  was  based  upon  somewhat  different  criteria.  Wilson 
argued  that  the  incomplete  metaloph  on  P4-M2  of  the  California 
Pareumys  material  ruled  out  this  genus  as  being  ancestral  to  Pseudo- 
cylindrodon  or  Cylindrodon.  This  was  true  for  the  latter  two  genera 
as  understood  at  that  time,  but  additional  material  of  Pseudocylin- 
drodon  neglectus  from  Pipestone  Springs,  Montana  (Black,  1965), 
shows  a  few  specimens  with  a  metaconule-posterior  cingulum  con- 
nection such  as  is  seen  in  the  California  specimens  of  Pareumys.  In 
Oligocene  species  of  Pseudocylindrodon  the  metaloph  is  never  inter- 
rupted completely  as  in  Wilson's  material  of  Pareumys.  This  incom- 
plete condition  of  the  metaloph  is  seen,  however,  in  some  Uintan 
specimens  of  Pseudocylindrodon  (Black,  in  press)  although  it  appears 
to  be  an  infrequent  variant  in  that  population.  It  would  appear  that 
variation  of  metaloph  development  is  typical  of  the  middle  Eocene 


Fig.  2.  Pareumys  giiensburgi,  A,  FMNH  PM  14978,  type,  lateral  view  of 
mandible,  X  4;  B,  FMNH  PM  14979,  lateral  view  of  mandible,  X  5;  C,  same, 
occlusal  view  of  M..,  X  10. 


B 


^H^ 


\ 


V 


1 


V 


457 


458  FIELDIANA:  GEOLOGY,  VOLUME  16 

Mysops  (Wilson,  1938)  and  of  the  late  Eocene  species  of  both  Pareu- 
mys  and  Pseudocylindrodon  whereas  a  complete  metaloph  had  been 
established  in  the  early  Oligocene  Cylindrodon  and  nearly  established 
in  the  early  Oligocene  Pseudocylindrodou .  In  this  character  Pareu- 
mys  appears  to  have  diverged  from  the  Pseudocylindrodon -Cylindro- 
don line  and  emphasized  the  metaconule-posterior  cingulum  attach- 
ment over  the  metaloph-protocone  attachment. 

There  is  an  even  more  fundamental  difference  between  these  two 
lineages,  however,  and  this  involves  a  reduction  in  the  size  of  P4  rela- 
tive to  Ml  and  M2  in  the  Mysops  to  Pareumys  line.  Another  lineage 
leading  to  Pseudocylindrodoyi  and  Cylindrodon  developed  from  My- 
sops which  maintained  the  size  of  P4  nearly  equal  to  that  of  the 
molars.  The  relative  size  of  M3  also  varies  in  these  two  lineages, 
with  M3  in  Pareumys  much  nearer  the  size  of  M1-M2  than  in  Pseudo- 
cylindrodon and  Cyliyidrodon . 

Pareumys  differs  from  the  Oligocene  Ardynomys  in  a  number  of 
respects  and  was  probably  not  ancestral  to  that  group  either.  There 
is  no  closure  of  the  central  valley  or  elongation  of  the  posterior  meta- 
conid  slope  in  Pareumys  as  in  Ardynomys,  the  buccal  valley  is  wider 
and  M1-M3  are  more  elongate  than  in  Ardynomys,  and  the  characters 
of  P4  already  mentioned  also  distinguish  Pareumys  from  Ardynomys. 

Within  Pareumys  itself,  P.  guenshurgi  has  P4  more  reduced  than 
in  P.  milleri,  P.  grangeri,  or  P.  troxelli.  Also,  P.  guenshurgi  is  much 
the  largest  species  of  the  genus.  In  other  details  of  the  dentition, 
P.  guenshurgi  is  quite  similar  to  P.  milleri  and  could  have  evolved 
from  the  Uintan  C  species.  As  far  as  is  known  at  present,  P.  guens- 
hurgi is  the  last  representative  of  the  genus. 

Acknowledgements. — I  would  like  to  thank  Dr.  John  Clark  who 
made  the  specimens  of  Pareumys  guenshurgi  available  to  me  for 
study.  This  research  was  carried  out  with  the  aid  of  NSF  Grant 
GB-7801.  Publication  was  supported  by  a  grant  from  the  Gulf  Oil 
Corporation. 


REFERENCES 

Black,  Craig  C. 

1965.  Fossil  mammals  from  Montana.  Pt.  2.  Rodents  from  the  early  Oligo- 
cene Pipestone  Springs  local  fauna.  Ann.  Carnegie  Mus.,  38,  pp.  1-48, 
figs.  1-6. 

In  press  The  paleontology  and  geology  of  the  Badwater  Creek  area,  central 
Wyoming.    Pt.  5.    The  cylindrodont  rodents.    Ann.  Carnegie  Mus. 


BLACK:  NEW  PAREUMYS  459 

Black,  Craig  C.  and  Mary  R.  Dawson 

1966.  A  review  of  late  Eocene  mammalian  faunas  from  North  America.  Amer. 
Jour.  Sci.,  264,  pp.  321-349,  fig.s.  1   4. 

Clark,  J.,  J.  R.  Beerbower,  and  K.  K.  Kietzke 

1967.  Oligocene  sedimentation,  stratigraphy,  paleoecology  and  paleoclimatol- 
ogy  in  the  Big  Badlands  of  South  Dakota.  Fieldiana:  Geol.  Mem.,  .5,  pp. 
1-158,  figs.  1-53. 

Kay,  J.  LeRoy 

1934.  The  Tertiary  formations  of  the  Uinta  Basin,  Utah.  Ann.  Carnegie  Mus., 
23,  pp.  357-371,  5  pis. 

Wilson,  J.  A.,  P.  C.  Twiss,  R.  K.  DeFord,  and  S.  E.  Clabaugh 

1968.  Stratigraphic  succession,  potassium-argon  dates,  and  vertebrate  faunas, 
Vieja  Group,  Rim  Rock  Country,  Trans-Pecos,  Texas.  Amer.  Jour.  Sci.,  266, 
pp.  590-604,  figs.  1-2. 

Wilson,  R.  W. 

1938.    Review  of  some  rodent  genera  from  the  Bridger  Eocene.    Part  II.  Amer. 

Jour.  Sci.,  35,  pp.  207-222,  figs.  5-12. 
1940.    Pareumys  remains  from  the  later  Eocene  of  California.     Carnegie  Inst. 

Wash.,  Publ.  No.  514,  pp.  97-108,  2  pis. 


n