Skip to main content

Full text of "Novel sound sources"

See other formats


At 


Research and Development Report 
REPORT 990 
17 October 1960 


Novel Sound Sources 


i Rew Padbexe:, edics 


= 
7] 6 Ss U. S. NAVY ELECTRONICS LABORATORY, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 
; A Bureau of Ships Laborator 
6 De p By, 


S 


066 jodey / TAN 


THE PROBLEM 


Design and develop novel low-frequency sound sources. 


RESULTS 


Two different types of high-intensity sound sources have 
been developed which have both military and commercial 
potentialities: 


1. The underwater spark sound source is suitable for 
explosive echo ranging, particularly from a submarine, 
and shows promise as a source for long-range, active 
detection and for long-range underwater signaling. The 
underwater spark is safer than chemical explosives and, 
unlike them, is repetitive. It is simple, reliable, and easily 
adapted to working at great depths. Its short-duration pulse 
allows discrimination against reverberation and is too short 
to "home on,"' particularly if single-pinging or staggered 
repetition rates are used. 

This source has been tested at a depth of 300 feet 
below the surface and generated peak pressures corresponding 
to an acoustic level in excess of 3 million watts for a broad- 
band nondirectional condition. In the 1000-4000-c/s frequency 
band, a corresponding acoustic level in excess of 300, 000 
watts was developed for a nondirectional condition. 

2. The pneumatic sound source, operating models of 
which were built and tested extensively, is probably the 
Simplest generator of underwater sound yet discovered (in 
its lightest form it weighs less than 1 pound). This source 
has generated a peak acoustic level of over 4000 watts for 
a nondirectional condition, in the frequency range between 
spands 00) c/s. 

The pneumatic sound source is suitable for ASW 
operation; conversion of coastal defense passive systems 
into active systems; explosive echo ranging; mine counter- 
measures; anti-limpeteer operations; and coded signaling. 
Typical commercial applications could be geophysical 
prospecting and explosive metal forming. 


WM ONAN MO 


RECOMMENDATIONS 


1. Conduct operational research to determine the useful- 
ness and limitations of both sound sources in the tactical 
applications suggested above. 

2, Continue the study and experiments described here, 
with a view to extending the potentialities of the two sound 
sources, and improving the materials and techniques 
involved in manufacturing and operating them. 

3. Consider the feasibility of resuming study of the 
other sound sources partially explored and briefly reported 
here. 


ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION 


Work was performed under AS 02101, S-F001 03 04, 
Task 8050 (NEL L3-3) by members of the Acoustics 
Division. The report covers work from June 1956 to 
September 1960 and was approved for publication 17 October 
1960. 

The author appreciates the assistance of F. D. Parker, 
Group Leader, and of M. R. Markland, C. C. Dietrich, 

J. Lyons, and P. Olszanecky. The work of John Pflaum in 
obtaining the high-speed underwater photographs; of E. Rolle, 
who developed many combinations of compounds for trial as 
dielectric material; and of R. J. Bolam, who assisted in the 
interpretation of the data, is also gratefully acknowledged. 


CONTENTS 


INTRODUCTION 
I. THE UNDERWATER SPARK SOUND SOURCE 
Design Considerations 
Theoretical Discussion 
Tests and Measurements 
Experiments with a Magnetic Gap 
Experiments with Resonators 
Il, THE PNEUMATIC SOUND SOURCE 
Background 
Early Experiments 
Design Considerations 
Theoretical Discussion 
Tests and Measurements 
The Acoustic Bomb 
lil. OTHER NOVEL SOUND SOURCES 
Conversion of Heat to Sound 
The ''Wolf Whistle" 
CONCLUSIONS 
I. The Underwater Spark Sound Source 
ll. The Pneumatic Sound Source 
RECOMMENDATIONS 
I. The Underwater Spark Sound Source 
Il. The Pneumatic Sound Source 


14 


295 


26 
27-28 


ILLUSTRATIONS 


Basic design of horn gap 

Variety of underwater spark gaps 
investigated 

Methods used to insulate and encapsulate 
spark plugs 

High-vacuum switch for energy transfer 

Plot of acoustic power vs. sound pressure 

Spark gap before and after firing 

Laboratory tank and camera installation 

Pictures of bubble development produced 
in laboratory tank under various 
conditions 

Deep- water test installation at Lake Pend 
Oreille 

Assembly for underwater high- speed 
photography 

Circular spark gap with underwater lights 

Inside view of spark capsule 

Oscillograph traces and high-speed photo- 
graphs of typical underwater spark 
signal 

High-speed photographs of bubble devel- 
opment at NELPOCS 

Arrangement for studying effect of magnetic 
field upon spark gap 

Experimental magnetic spark gap 

Typical resonant chamber 

Waveforms produced by resonant spark 
sound source 

Resonating coil for underwater spark 

Spark gap in compliant resonant chamber 

Waveforms produced by spark source in 
compliant resonant chamber 

Pneumatic high-power 1f sound source 

Molds for rubber spheres 

Pneumatic spheres of various wall 
thicknesses 

Photographs of bubble development from a 
2-inch sphere 

Experimental models of rubber spheres 

Plots of frequency vs. depth for 
pneumatic sound sources 


Page 
53 


53 
54 
54 
56 
57 


59 
59 


61 


Figure 


29 


30 


ol 


32 


33 


34 


35 
36 


37 


Plots of frequency vs. depth for 
pneumatic sound source 

Typical waveform produced by 1. 3-inch 
pneumatic sphere 

Close-up view of surgical rubber tube 
after rupture 

Close-up view of rubber sphere after 
rupture 

Photographs of bubble development from 
2-inch sphere 

Photographs of bubble development from 
2-inch sphere 

Original model of acoustic bomb 

Acoustic bomb with Mark 15 Mod 0 
pressure mechanism 

The ''Wolf Whistle" 


INTRODUCTION 


The advent of deep-running nuclear submarines has 
brought about an urgent need for greater detection ranges 
and, consequently, a requirement for new and improved 
means of generating sound underwater, at increasingly 
lower frequencies. This requirement has increased the 
size and cost of sonar equipment, and sonar advances to date 
have been considerably dependent upon transducer construc- 
tion. As the number of transducer engineers is somewhat 
limited, it has been necessary to concentrate most of their 
efforts on established techniques. However, it has been 
recognized that some investigation should be directed 
toward unconventional methods of generating sound, 
particularly in the low-frequency region. Accordingly, 
the Bureau of Ships established a problem to investigate 
novel sound sources. The personnel at NEL assigned to 
this problem were all experienced in the field of generating 
high-power signals, and had previously conducted inter- 
mittent studies of the underwater spark as a sound source. 
Thus it was logical to use this technique as a point of 
departure in undertaking the new assignment. Although 
other government laboratories no longer were exploring 
this approach, a study was made of previous work by 
others before the study was resumed at NEL. 

Work with the underwater spark at this laboratory 
prior to May 1956 has already been reported. | The early 
work had clearly indicated that much of the success of the 
spark source was directly related to the electrodes and 
the geometry of the gap. It was therefore decided that this 
particular phase would be studied thoroughly, leaving major 
power increases to later. 

A number of other techniques, such as exciting metals 
into vibration by contact with solid carbon dioxide, or vibra- 
ting wires, reeds, plates, etc., have been given limited 
trials, but have not been explored sufficiently to warrant 
reporting at this time. The work on novel sound sources is 
continuing. 


"ijnderwater—Spank Sound Source, '' by L. R. Padberg, Jr. 
(Article 32 in NEL Report 698, Lorad Summary Report, 
CONFIDENTIAL, 22 June 1956) 


I, THE UNDERWATER SPARK SOUND SOURCE 


The theory of the underwater spark as a sound source 
has been considered for some time without conclusive 
findings as to its value and limitations, or the optimum 
design of the equipments involved. The principle of this 
sound source may be stated briefly as follows: an underwater 
electrical discharge causes a Sharp increase in temperature 
of the water between the electrodes. The water vaporizes 
and forms a gas bubble which expands and collapses, and 
radiates acoustic waves. The nature of the radiation is 
dependent upon a number of factors. The following sections 
discuss some of the major theoretical and mechanical 
considerations involved, and the development and testing 
of a workable model of the underwater spark sound source. 


DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 


Several years of experiment made it apparent that much 
had to be learned about the development and construction of 
suitable electrodes and gaps before a satisfactory underwater 
spark sound source, producing high acoustic levels in the 
lower frequency region, could be achieved. Experience at 
NEL and other laboratories showed that there was consider- 
able variability from one spark discharge to another. 


Construction of the Gap 


A basic fact about spark gaps, operated underwater, is 
that the power into the load is equal to the current squared 
times the resistance, or 


Therefore, it is necessary to make the resistance of the 

gap as large as possible. When two electrodes are short- 
circuited by water the resistance is low rather than high 

as is desired. It is apparent that the gap should be as wide 
as possible to raise this value. A method for getting high 
power that at first seems effective is to use a wide gap and 
very high voltages to cause the gap to break down. Another 
way is to raise the gap resistance by using the best dielectric 


material obtainable between the electrodes, slightly imbedding 
them in it. When very high electrical energy is discharged 
across the gap, the water is vaporized almost instantaneously 
and the gap resistance is raised. 

In studying the literature and noting the size of the condue- 
tors used in some tests it is apparent that few experimenters 
have realized the magnitude of the first surge of current. For 
example, in discharging 3000 watt-seconds of energy across 
the electrodes, the current has been measured in excess of 
220,000 amperes for brief periods. (Short, heavy leads are 
essential for such an operation.) Very high temperatures at 
the gap were also reported and, on one occasion, electrodes 
made of titanium showed considerable melting. (Titanium 
melts at 1800°C.) 

Since it is desired to have the electrical discharge appear 
only at the exposed electrode surface, NEL underwater spark 
gaps have all been based upon the principle of the ‘horn gap. 
The basic design of this gap is shown in figure 1. While the 
optimum electrode material is tungsten, it is difficult to 
machine and, for experimental purposes, too expensive. 

Most of the NEL electrodes were machined from either brass 
or copper. Some of the NEL gaps have been fired thousands 
of times. 


scosgg cena 


te 
iam 


y 
4 


Figure 1. Basic design of horn gap (before encapsulating). 


The narrow slot shown in figure 1 will eventually be 
the front of the gap. Note how the gap space widens toward 
the rear. Although the picture shows one continuous piece 
of brass, the metal will eventually be machined, after 
encapsulating in a suitable dielectric material, into two 
separate halves. This is an original technique, which 
insures a constant gap spacing. Many configurations have 
been tried and all incorporate the principle of having the 
narrowest part of the gap at the front to prevent the discharge 
from occurring inside the material where it will not only 
be ineffective but will explode the gap. Figure 2 shows 
several types of underwater spark gaps investigated. 


Figure 2, Variety of underwater spark gaps investigated. 


QLOHd AYOLYYOGVT SOINOULOIIT AAYN 'S ‘Nl 


S3HONI NI 31¥OS 


(penutyuod) °% etnsty 


10 


(penuljuoD) *Z ainsty 


Bis] ay efit IFES Meer sales Teta] 


Sy ep ep ey pt py 


12 


Early Types of Underwater Spark Gaps 


The first experiments with underwater sparks as a 
source of sound utilized special types of automotive and 
aircraft spark plugs. Since spark plugs were not designed 
for use underwater, in general they were unplated and 
rusted very quickly. Several better types were found that 
were either chromium or cadmium plated. The types 
with multiple discharge points, such as the aircraft variety 
designed for igniting jet fuel, proved most satisfactory. 

In general it was found that the porcelain insulation near 
the firing points blew off on the first firing but the plugs 
continued to function. 

It was concluded very early in the experimental 
program that special spark gaps would have to be designed 
to handle any substantial power level. For energy levels 
below about 100 watt-seconds, several types of plugs proved 
satisfactory. To obtain greater power, attempts were made 
to operate plugs in various series and parallel combinations. 
Such arrangements usually proved unsatisfactory since 
the plugs would seldom fire simultaneously. Firing would 
be random and almost unpredictable due to non-uniform 
point burning. Various modes of insulating and encapsula- 
ting the plugs were tried. A few of the combinations are 
shown in figure 3. 


Energy Transfer 


The sudden discharge of a large amount of stored energy 
into a virtual short circuit is a great strain on any type of 
electrical switch. A literature search revealed that many 
experimenters are still using a three-ball open air gap for 
the energy transfer. This method may result in extremely 
low efficiency. Hydrogen thyratrons are fairly effective but 
are short-lived and have associated ''flash-back'' troubles. 

From the beginning of the underwater spark studies at 
NEL, specially designed high-vacuum switches have been used 
for the energy transfer function. Switching the high voltages 
and current in a vacuum solves many problems and is prob- 
ably the most practical way of accomplishing the transfer. 
Thus all the energy is directed into the gap in water, where 
it can be utilized, rather than into the air where its effective- 
ness is lost and where it is hazardous to the eardrums of the 
personnel in the area. The vacuum switch used (fig. 4) has 
a rating of 30 kv at 600 amperes rms, and has been used 
successfully to carry peak pulse currents of 220, 000 amperes. 


Figure 3. Examples of methods used to insulate and 
encapsulate spark plugs. 


ks 


14 


Figure 4. 


High-vacuum switch for 


energy transfer. 


Energy Storage 


Although the principle of energy storage is as old as 
the electrical industry, great advances have recently been 
made in the construction of energy storage capacitors, 
largely as a result of atomic power developments. The type 
of job to be done will dictate whether to use very low capa- 
city at high voltage, or very large capacity at lower voltage. 
The basic formula for energy storage is: 


E = Gy 
2 


In most of the experiments reported here, very large 
capacitors were used at moderately high voltages, for exam- 
ple 60 microfarads at a working voltage of 15,000. Most 
early work used 100 or more microfarads at 4000 working 
volts. Corona discharge causes little trouble at these 
voltages but can be severe at higher voltages, particularly 
in the damp atmosphere at sea. 

Few experimenters have made any mention of the 
inductance of energy storage capacitors. It is important 
to keep this value low for efficient operation. Only recent 
designs have this feature. It is equally important to keep 
all the ''tank circuit'' leads of heavy copper bus, since the 
discharge currents run into many thousands of amperes. 


Dielectric Material for the Gap 


For many years there has been a continuing search for 
a Suitable dielectric material that could withstand the explo- 
sive forces at the point of discharge. A number of materials 
have been found that are fairly satisfactory for energy levels 
up to about 1000 watt-seconds, at 1 atmosphere of pressure. 
Pressure increased beyond that level resulted in water 
getting inside the gap and causing internal explosion. Many 
materials were found that could withstand severe beating 
with a hammer without breaking or chipping but fractured 
when used in the gap. A certain amount of pliability seems 
desirable and also reduces the problem of recoil which is 
very great in the underwater spark explosion. Additional 
evidence of the tremendous forces at the gap is that the 
shock wave generated can be used to form metals such as 
stainless steel, titanium, etc. Numerous combinations of 


15 


16 


unsaturated compounds of high molecular weight were tried 
for the dielectric material. Some have proved far superior 
to commercial epoxy resins. One of the latter, known by 
the trade name of ''Scotchcast No. 2'' has been satisfactory 
up to levels of around 3000 watt-seconds. 

In recent experiments using an energy level of 6000 
watt-seconds, it was found necessary to abandon the dielec- 
tric material and simply fire a well insulated brass rod 
against a heavy bronze ground plate. This may be one of 
the practical solutions to the problem. 


Geometry of the Gap 


Since one of the basic aims of the work was to obtain 
significant output levels in the low-frequency region below 
5000 c/s, many configurations of electrodes were tried. 
The importance of the gap geometry became evident early. 
This factor can be made to focus sound, can affect the size 
and shape of the bubble, and it controls the duration of the 
pulse. The many bubble photographs included in the report 
illustrate its significance; note the strange, almost ''square"' 
shapes of bubbles produced under some conditions. The 
phenomena associated with the geometry of the gap are not 
fully understood, and should be studied. 


THEORETICAL DISCUSSION 


Frequencies Generated by an Underwater Spark Discharge 


The underwater spark discharge is essentially broad- 
band in character and similar to the discharge of a chemical 
explosive except that it is more susceptible to energy peaking 
at certain frequency bands. From an echo-ranging stand- 
point, high acoustic energy in the region between 1000 and 
3000 c/s is desirable. Through the use of techniques 
reported here, peak acoustic powers greater than those 
obtained from large costly sound projectors have already 
been achieved. Since we are not interested in wasting 
large amounts of power in the region above 15 kc/s, we have 
designed underwater spark gaps that generate large, low- 
frequency bubbles. The bubble pulse from an underwater 
spark can be quite useful, although previous experimenters 
have given little attention to this fact. The frequency of the 


Avg. Sound Pressure Over the Surface of a 1 meter sphere 


bubble pulse is directly proportional to the depth at which it 
is generated. In the region of 1000 to 3000 c/s for a non- 
directional condition, peas acoustic pressure levels of 
about 125 db/dyne/cm¢ at 1 meter have been measured. 
This would correspond to 300 kw of acoustic power (fig. 5). 


TMT TT 7 3 


os 


(DB vs 1 Gyneienis at 1 Meter) 


110 rani ES 
2 
IP DB ie = tt 
ae Bh vs 1 dyne/cm” at 1 meter) = 10 Log IP tic 70.6 
= — Directivity Index 
Paxis P ave 


1000 10, 000 100, 000 1, 000, 000 
Total Acoustic Power in Watts 


Figure 5. Plot of acoustic power vs. sound pressure. 


Add to this the 10 db or more that can be gained by a reflector 
of reasonable size, and the result is a megawatt of acoustic 
power in a beam that can be directed wherever desired. 

By combining such features as resonant discharge loops, 
exciting resonant cavities, and operating the spark source, if 
possible, at a depth where the bubble pulse is at the same 
frequency as the resonators, substantial acoustic levels could 
be obtained in the low-frequency region required for long- 
distance echo-ranging. The underwater spark is simplicity 
itself when compared with complex sophisticated sonars. 


il 


18 


Effect of Pressure on Electrodes 


Insufficient evidence has been obtained to form any pos- 
itive conclusions on the effect of pressure on electrodes. 
However, Several findings can be reported. 

In deep-water tests at Lake Pend Oreille it was found 
that electrodes that performed very well in many firings at 
near atmospheric pressure blew to pieces when used at a 
depth of 300 feet below the surface. An example of this is 
shown in figure 6. Evidence of many firings can be seen 
by examining tne electrode surfaces. Experience has shown 
that if water gets inside the electrode it will cause it to 
explode from within. In the case shown, apparently water 
penetrated the dielectric material via a small crack when 
subjected to pressure at this depth. 

In one test, using a gap Separation of 1/2 inch, the gap 
which fired well at atmospheric pressure would not fire 
when the pressure was increased to 200 psi for the same 
impressed potential. Decreasing the gap solved the problem. 
This result would indicate that there is probably a critical 
gap spacing versus depth, at least in fresh water. This 
should not be a problem in sea water. 

All the problems of deep submergence appear to be 
ultimately surmountable, and the underwater spark sound 
source appears to be well adapted for use in the deep 
ocean. 


TESTS AND MEASUREMENTS 
Test Procedure 
Tank Observations 


Pressure and frequency measurements of underwater 
sound usually have to be made in an open body of water or 
in specially constructed acoustic tanks. For visual and 
aural observations, however, a small tank is useful. Two 
tanks were used in most of the laboratory experiments 
reported here. The smaller of the two was a modified 
ammunition box measuring approximately 48 by 40 by 30 
inches (fig. 7); the larger tank was a modified barge pontoon 
measuring approximately 5 by 7 by 5 feet. Both tanks were 
painted white on the inside to provide contrast for photog- 
raphy. 


Figure 6. Spark gap (A) before and (B) after firing at 
300-foot depth. 


19 


20 


Figure 7. Laboratory tank and camera installation. The 
second camera has been removed to show end window and 
tank construction. 


Salt Water vs. Fresh Water 


Almost all the underwater spark experiments to date have 
been made with fresh water. On occasion salt water was 
substituted with no apparent difference except in gap spacing. 
Distilled water was also tried and the gaps would not fire, 

In most areas, fresh water contains many impurities and 
therefore has a sufficiently low resistance. In one exper- 
iment the gap was Opened to a point at which there was not 
sufficient potential to cause the gap to fire. Increasing the 
Salinity of the solution caused the gap to fire as before. 


High-Speed Photography 


High-speed photography was used to study the phenomena 
of the underwater spark and pneumatic sound sources. For 
nearly all this work two Eastman Type 3 high-speed cameras 
were uSed, photographing the action from two angles. Pic- 
ture rates for the underwater spark shots averaged about 
2800 per second and for the pneumatic explosions about 
2000 per second. Thousands of feet of 16-mm motion pictures 
were made, and stills from many of the sequences are shown 
in this report. Figures 8A-B are pictures of bubble develop- 
ment in the laboratory tank under various conditions. The 
deep-water photographs appear in subsequent sections. 


(A) From reflector gap. 


sae : eens 


(B) "Square" bubbles illustrating effects of 
geometry of gap on size and shape of bubbles. 


Figure 8. Sequences from high-speed motion pictures 
of bubble development produced in laboratory tank under 
various conditions. 


21 


‘snid yteds t90,3emsapun payetd wory (dD) 


(penut}uoD) 


"9 oINSI yy 


22 


"‘TBLLayeUL OLTJOSTATIp YSIY UI pappequIt Sapo.joarta [atpered wo1y (q) 


(penutjuod) 


9 oInsty 


As 


“S1a]BUISIP JUSTETJIp JO Saporjpoaja Teotseyds wor (q) (penutjuoD) “g eanst gy 


24 


Deep- Water Tests at Lake Pend Oreille, Idaho 


As the limitations of the small tank precluded meaningful 
measurements in the low-frequency region, arrangements 
were made for calibration measurements at the NEL Pend 
Oreille Calibration Station in Idaho (fig. 9). Months of 
preparation were necessary to obtain high-speed underwater 
photographs of the bubble development down to a depth of 
300 feet below the surface, simultaneously with sound- 
pressure and frequency measurements. The problems of 
adequate lighting and synchronizing were sizable. 


Figure 9. Installation at Lake Pend Oreille for deep-water 
tests, showing extension dock used to lower power and control 
cables into water. Small float in foreground holds trans- 
formers for boosting shore power to barge. 


25 


26 


A large framework was constructed on which the necessary 
equipment was mounted (fig. 10). The equipment included 
two Eastman Type 3 high-speed cameras mounted to 
photograph the bubbles from two different angles, eight 
1000-watt lamps, the underwater spark capsule, and pneu- 
matic source. To accomodate the heavy currents required 
for the lights, welding cables were used for conductors. 
All the components were enclosed in watertight housings. 


Spark Capsule 


Since it is impractical to run very heavy currents, such 
as those generated in the underwater spark, down long cables, 
the entire spark sound source was built into a discarded air 
flask from a torpedo (fig. 11). The flask was cut in half and 
a flange welded at the center. It contained a 3000-watt- 
second energy storage system and 15, 000-volt dc power 
supply. Vacuum relays, such as previously described, were 
used for keying and safety discharge. Figure 12 is an inside 
view of the capsule. Note that the spark gaps were mounted 
directly at the bottom of the capsule to keep the lead length 
to a minimum. A small, multiple conductor cable connected 
the capsule with the surface and supplied 110-volt, 60-c/s, ac 
to the unit. A single pair of wires triggered the source from 
the surface. This arrangement worked well and would be 
suitable for lowering the equipment from a ship or helicopter. 
A switch inside the camera would automatically synchronize 
the firing with the camera. The spark capsule demonstrated 
that an intense sound source can be made into a small unit. 
For use aboard a submarine, the capsule could be attached 
on the deck, outside the hull, and thus conserve space inside. 


Analysis of the Underwater Spark Signals 


In the tests reported here, the underwater spark dis- 
charge data were obtained by means of three separate 
methods for later analysis in the laboratory. One was 
high-speed photography of the bubble formation. Speeds 
of approximately 2800 frames per second were used. In 
addition, the signal, received on a calibrated hydrophone 
separated 20 meters from the source, was recorded ona 
Magnecord Model PT6J tape recorder. Tape speeds of 


15 inches per second were used. Ina third method this 
same signal was fed to the vertical deflection amplifier of 
a Tektronix Model 512 oscilloscope. This display was 
photographed using a 35-mm Fairchild oscillograph camera. 
The horizontal sweep or time base was achieved by the 
movement of the film past the vertically deflected spot on 
the scope face. The film was set to run by the deflected 
spot at 25 inches per second; to insure accuracy of final 
reading, timing marks were placed on the film at 100-msec 
intervals. 

During the laboratory analysis of the data it was found 
that the tape recordings were of limited value. This was 
because the data were amplified and put on the tape as 
amplitude changes. The low-frequency response of an AM 
recording distorts and loses much of the detail in this type 
of complex signal. A frequency- modulated type of record- 
ing and playback would have corrected this deficiency; how- 
ever it was not possible to conduct further experiments 
after this shortcoming was noted. Fortunately the two 
types of photographically recorded data appear to contain 
the necessary detail. Figure 13, with its associated descrip- 
tion, provides pertinent information on a typical underwater 
spark signal. It should be noted that the signal from the 
underwater spark is very similar to the signal received 
from underwater explosions of TNT. 

The signal in figure 13 covers a period of slightly more 
than 13 milliseconds with the source at 100-foot depth. 
During the first 2 msec the shock wave amplitude was so 
high that the signal was off the film and cannot be seen. At 
about 3.8 msec the bubble has expanded to its greatest 
diameter and the pressure is falling. At about 7.6 msec 
from the start the pressure rises sharply as predicted, 
corresponding in time with the near maximum contraction 
of the bubble. The bubble then expands to a second max- 
imum at about 9.2 msec and the pressure falls until it 
reaches a point at about 10.8 msec, where again the pres- 
sure rises sharply, corresponding to another maximum in 
the contraction of the bubble. The bubble then tries to 
expand again but begins to disperse. 

In addition to the oscillograph trace of figure 13, 
pertinent frames from the high-speed record are shown 
with identification of their time-position relative to the 
oscillograph trace. 


4 Gilg, R. H., Underwater Explosions, Princeton University 


Press, 1948 


ill 


"IUIBITJ O} poyoezye are satqeo 
pue s}ysI[ ‘soseo pue se1ouieo ‘aurerjy Surtmoyus ‘Aydeis 
-ojoyd paeds -ysty toyemiapun 10j ATqUIOSSY “QI o1NnST YW 


NITRE GER 


4 
£ 


28 


Figure 11. Circular spark gap with cluster of underwater 
lights to provide illumination for photography. Nose of 
camera case in foreground; visual calibration grids in 


background. 


as) 


30 


Figure 12. 


Inside view of spark capsule. 


‘Teusis yreds rayemsapun Teotdds} e Jo sydeirsoj0yd 
peeds-ysty pajoe[es pue sa0ei} yderso[[IosQ “eT auns1y 


SCNOOGSITTIN 


aunssaud GNNOS 


31 


Sound-Pressure Measurements 


The sound-pressure levels listed below were measured 
at the NEL Pend Oreille Calibration Station in Idaho in 
July 1959. The lake is 750 feet deep at this point. (Photo- 
graphs of bubble development at NEL POCS appear in 
figure 14. ) 

Using an energy source of 3000 watt-seconds, a peak, 
broadband sound-pressure level of 135.2 db/dyne/cm 
referred to 1 meter was measured with the underwater 
spark source 100 feet below the surface. This was fora 
nondirectional condition and corresponds to a peak acoustic 
power in the water of about 3 million watts. 

Additional omnidirectional measurements, made ata 
depth of 300 feet and using low-pass filtering, show the 
following results: 


Low-pass Acoustic Pressure Level Approximate 
Cut- off (c/s) (db/dyne/cm™ ref. 1 meter) Acoustic Level (kw) 
200 114.0 295 
1000 122.0 150 
4000 1272-10 150 
9000 225 160 


As can be seen, a substantial amount of energy appeared 
in the region between 1000 and 4000 c/s. Reference to the 
graph in figure 5 will show that the acoustic level in the 1000 
to 4000 c/s region is 300, 000 watts. There are few, if any, 
existing sound sources generating powers of this magnitude. 
Since the source levels were for the nondirectional case, it 
appears that additional gains can be made by operating the 
spark source at the focus of a reflector. The dimension of 
such a reflector at this frequency is practical for many 
applications where directivity is desired. 

Since these measurements were made, the electrical 
storage-transmitter power has been doubled. However, no 
sound-level measurements have been made using the new 
storage unit. 


EXPERIMENTS WITH A MAGNETIC GAP 


A few experiments were conducted to determine the effects 
of a magnetic field on the spark gap. The first simple measure- 
ments used a spark plug inserted between the poles of a large 
magnetron magnet (fig. 15). Later experiments employed 


des [eotiayds wouj selqqng (Vv) 


“Q0ejINS MOTE 199F OOS 
“8[[lt94O Puxd VYeT 3e 


yuouldoTeAep etqqnq jo sydeisojoyd peeds-ysiyT “FI ons 


33 


“QOBJINS MOTI }299J YNZ SAapoOtjoala jurod-aTpaeu wor (gq) (penuTyUOCD) 


"pl eunsty 


34 


‘Q0eJINS MOTE 12a3 YNZ (SedA} 
om) des yreds Aq paonpoad aouanbas [Tetjteg (Dd) (panuljuoD) “PI eunsty 


35 


36 


Oy 


Figure 15. Arrangement for studying effect of magnetic 
field upon spark gap (keeper in place). 


ceramic magnets, ''Mobilarc Gaps, '' manufactured by the 
Westinghouse Electric Corporation for protecting high- 
tension power lines from lightning discharges. These 
magnets spun the arc and thus avoided burning a gap at one 
spot. The underwater spark gap which was designed around 
the ceramic magnet is shown in figures 16A-B. While the 
gap performed well, its over-all improvement over other 
designs was questionable. In using the large circular gaps 
it was difficult to produce a true ''ring fire, '' as the spark 
tended to rotate around the gap in a random manner, 


EXPERIMENTS WITH RESONATORS 


A limited amount of work at obtaining spectral emphasis 
in the 1000-c/s region by the use of water-filled resonant 
chambers was described in reference 1. Several chambers 
were designed and tested using these techniques. A typical 
chamber is shown in figures 17A-B. The resonant frequency 
was first calculated as previously described and checked 
in water using Lissajous patterns. The agreement with 
original calculations was very close (fig. 18). The chamber 
was then shock excited into vibration by the underwater 
spark, using electrical resonance in the charging circuit 
(fig. 19). This combination worked very well. 

Dr. William Toulis, while at NEL, constructed a 
compliant-tube type of resonant chamber (fig. 20) for 
use with underwater spark gaps. Data from tests using 
this device are shown in figure 21. 


Il. THE PNEUMATIC SOUND SOURCE 


BACKGROUND 


In a further attempt to generate high-intensity sound 
underwater, several simple experiments were performed 
with the pneumatic sound source. Its principle of operation 
is as follows: An elastic sphere is inflated underwater until 
its expansion limit is exceeded and it ruptures. Upon being 


37 


38 


Fle le li [eve lai al \ [ 


Figure 16. Experimental magnetic spark gap, 
and (B) disassembled. 


(A) assembled 


Figure 17. Typical resonant chamber (A) assembled and 
(B) disassembled. 


39 


7.0 MSEG 


200-400 CYCLES 400-800 CYCLES 


800-1600 CYCLES 1600-3200 CYCLES 3200-6400 CYCLES 


6400-12,800 CYCLES I2,800- 25,600 CYCLES CALIBRATE =!1000 CYCLES 


Figure 18. Waveforms produced by resonant spark sound source. 


40 


Eneuge 19° 


Figure 20. 


Resonating coil for underwater spark. 


Spark gap in compliant resonant chamber. 


4] 


BROADBAND 


END OPEN 


1000-3000 CYCLES 2000-4000 CYCLES 2000-10,000 CYCLES 


END PARTLY CLOSED 


1000-3000 CYCLES 2000-3000 CYCLES 2000-10,000 CYCLES 


Figure 21. Waveforms produced by spark source in 
compliant resonant chamber. 


42 


released, the air bubble alternately expands and contracts, 
providing a wave train at the resonant frequency of the 
bubble. The frequency of a given bubble size is controlled 
by the stiffness of the medium, which is proportional to 
depth. Thus, the frequency of oscillation can be controlled. 
Preliminary tests with this source were encouraging. 

Work has continued, and thousands of pneumatic explosions 
have been made with uniform results. Frequencies between 
5 and 300 c/s have been generated in this fashion. 


EARLY EXPERIMENTS 


The early trials consisted of inflating many types and 
shapes of elastic material underwater. Surgical rubber 
tubing was tried in many lengths and wall thicknesses. 
Rubber bulbs, plastic bottles, and glass beakers were also 
tested and were blown to destruction. Best results were 
obtained with surgical rubber because of its uniformity. 
For inflation, both compressed air and carbon dioxide were 
used--the latter in the form of carbon dioxide cylinders, 
with their triggering mechanisms, from standard Navy life 
jackets. Figure 22 shows one of the early designs. 


Figure 22. Pneumatic high-power/1lf sound source, with 
6-8 gram CO, cartridge. 


Nowell Low Frequency Sound Sources, by L. R. Padberg, Jr., 
NEL Letter Report 38, CONFIDENTIAL, 14 October 1957 


43 


DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 


Early measurements made at the Sweetwater Calibration 
Station showed that pressure was dependent upon the wall 
thickness of the rubber. It was also observed that the best 
waveform was obtained from spherical sources. A local 
rubber manufacturer was therefore contacted to discuss the 
problem of fabricating special rubber spheres. The 
manufacturer agreed to develop special formulas, attempting 
to find one that would give results equal or superior to those 
obtained with surgical rubber. NEL-designed and built molds 
for the job (fig. 23). In order to obtain a maximum of data 
in a short time, it was decided to concentrate on a sphere 
approximately 1 inch in diameter, varying the wall thickness 
from one model to another to compare results (fig. 24). 
High-speed photographs (approximately 2500 frames per 
second) were made of the bubbles produced by these spheres; 
figure 25 is a typical sequence. Later, spheres of other 
outside diameters and various wall thicknesses were made 
by the manufacturer for testing (fig. 26). 

Following are the major characteristics of rubber mixtures 
used in the NEL tests: 


Surgical Reeves Reeves Reeves 
Rubber Wikis SOI, 1 Wks SOIR, 5* wWob< 216 


Durometer 

Hardness 42 47 50 60 
Specific 

Gravity ? 1.02 1.02 ike iil 
Tensile 

Strength (psi) 3400 3310 4500 3400 
Elongation (%) 600 690 TUS 480 


*The greatest number of tests at NEL have used Reeves Mix 3015.5 


Directionality at Low Frequency 


The problem of obtaining high directivity at frequencies 
below 1000 c/s has been a major difficulty for many years 
because the necessary reflector, to be effective, must be 
of such large physical dimensions. 


Figure 23. NEL designs of molds for rubber spheres. 


45 


“SeSSousoIYy} [TEM SNoTIeA jo satayds of;eurnsug 


"Pe OInsty 


46 


‘oes go] AjTayewtxoidde ‘aseyd sty Jo uoneing 
yout-z & Wor yUaUIdOTaANp a[qqnq jo aduanbes 


‘azayds qo 
"G¢ aanst aq 


47 


‘aseyd stu} jo 


uoT1e1ng 


‘oosl go, AjTeyewtxoardde 
(penulyuoDd) “GZ eansty 


48 


For years, the explosives industry has sought a direc- 
tive explosive charge, with only minor success. The pneu- 
matic sound source would provide an intense low-frequency 
point source for use with large parabolic reflectors. At 
frequencies in the order of 300 c/s the size of a suitable 
reflector might not be compatible with a shipboard installa- 
tion, although it might be quite suitable for an ocean-floor 
installation. As an example, at 300 c/s, if the parabolic 
reflector were 200 feet in diameter, then a 5° beam would 
be obtained. The directivity index of such an assembly 
would be approximately 32 db and it is possible that a 
source level of as much as 138 db above 1 dyne/cm#? at 
1 meter would be obtainable. This would be a very usable 
source level at this low frequency. 


gee 


6 


Cee ee eee PEN IIE Ce eee eel yea ae. 


Figure 26. Examples of rubber spheres designed by 
manufacturer for testing: (A) 3-inch OD with 0. 75-inch 
wall; (B) 1. 375-inch OD with 0. 25-inch wall. 


49 


50 


Inflation of the Sphere 


The kind of gas used for inflation will be dictated somewhat 
by where and how the pneumatic source is used. In shallow- 
water applications, most of the experiments were conducted 
using conventional Navy issue carbon dioxide cylinders of 
different sizes. For deep submersion work the problem is 
more involved, since carbon dioxide is very temperature- 
sensitive. In these applications compressed air at around 
2000 psi was used. In order to obtain rupture a certain 
differential pressure must be achieved depending upon the 
elastic material used. 

Inflation of pneumatic spheres or tubes might also be 
accomplished by an explosive gas, with the rupture induced 
by application of a spark. Since there is a marked difference 
between the broad-band sound produced by a chemical 
explosive alone and the almost monofrequency effect of the 
pneumatic source, it would appear that a combination of the 
two might well produce a substantial low-frequency output. 
However, this possibility has not been explored at NEL, as 
considerable study of chemical explosives as sound sources 
has already been performed elsewhere. 


THEORETICAL DISC USSION 


Frequency Control 


The frequency of the pneumatic sound source can be 
closely controlled. Although it is dependent to some degree 
on characteristics of the basic sphere, it is more conven- 
iently dependent on the hydrostatic pressure to which it is 
subjected at the time of bursting. The composite effect of 
diameter and wall thickness is evident by comparing the 
data on figures 27, 28, and 29, which are plots of frequency 
vs. depth for three different sizes of spheres, all made of 
Reeves Rubber Company Mix No. 3015.5. It has been 
found that other rubber mixes influence the frequency 
characteristic of a given sized sphere, probably because of 
differences in elasticity. 


10° 


=a ] 
Se Sgieeen 
Avg. 5S, 106.5 db above 1 microbar 
& ee is | a a 
at 1 meter (peak level) a (e 


cH sll 


=a Fe 


| 
[ela] 
H [| 
a HH 
10 eeu | lili 
10 


Freq. in Cycles 
S 
wo 
LN 
y 
te [sees | ee 
aaa] 
ars SS] 
aS SS eal 


107 10° 


Depth in Feet 


Figure 27. Plot of frequency vs. depth for pneumatic sound 
source (1-inch OD sphere inflated with compressed air) 
Wall thickness 0. 3125 inch. 


3 
Soe 


Frequency in Cycles 


Depth in Feet 


Figure 28. Plot of frequency vs. depth for pneumatic sound 
source (1. 375-inch OD sphere inflated with compressed air). 
Wall thickness 0.25 inch. 


51 


a2 


Sound- Pressure Level 


The behavior of the bubble produced by the pneumatic 
source varies significantly from that produced by the under- 
water spark. After rupture of the sphere, the resulting 
bubble oscillates without complete collapse, until it finally 
disintegrates. The pulse so generated remains at a single 
frequency and does not contain the high frequencies that are 
produced by chemical explosives or the underwater spark; 
their bubbles collapse completely and re-expand during their 
oscillation period, thus producing a broad band of sound 
frequencies. 

In hundreds of measurements involving the 1-inch sphere 
with 3/8-inch walls, the average peak sound-pressure level 
for an omnidirectional condition was found to be 107 db/dyne/ 
em2 at 1 meter, at selectable frequencies within the band 
25-250 c/s. This corresponds to an acoustic level of about 4000 
watts, which is impressive at low frequencies. Much higher 
levels appear obtainable in the near future. 


Waveform 


A typical waveform from a 1.3-inch pneumatic sphere 
is shown in figure 30. This form is obtained without any 
filtering using an amplifier and hydrophone with a flat 
response between 20 c/s and 10 kc/s. The sine wave at 
the bottom of the figure is that of a 50-c/s calibrate signal. 
It will be noted that the waveform has a very steep front, 
probably indicating the presence of many frequencies, 
and immediately goes into the low-frequency oscillation 
which in this case is approximately 30 c/s. An unusual 
effect is shown in figures 31 and 32. Here the rubber 
material has ruptured in the form of a decayed sine wave 
similar to the actual waveform (fig. 30). 


Pulse Length 


The acoustic signal generated by the bursting of the 
pneumatic source is a damped wave of approximately 100 
milliseconds of usable duration. This lends itself to 
narrower band filtering in the receiver than can be used 
with the much shorter pulse lengths generated by the 
underwater spark source. 


in Cycles 


Freq. 


Avg. Sr, 105 db above 1 microbar 


at 1 meter (peak level) 


Depth in Feet 


Figure 29. Plot of frequency vs. depth for pneumatic sound 
source (3-inch OD sphere inflated with compressed air). 
Heavy wall thickness. 


Figure 30. Typical waveform produced by 1. 3-inch OD pneumatic 
sphere; no filtering used. The sine wave at the bottom is that of 
a 50-c/s calibrate signal. 


53 


54 


Figure 31. Close-up view of 3/4-inch surgical rubber tube 
after rupture. 


Figure 32. Close-up view of 3-inch OD rubber sphere with 
0. 25-inch wall after rupture. 


TESTS AND MEASUREMENTS 
Shallow Water Tests 


All initial tests of the pneumatic sound source were 
conducted in shallow water at the Navy Sweetwater Calibra- 
tion Station. These tests can be summarized by stating 
that the average peak sound level was around 100 db /dyne /cm2 
at 1 meter for the early thin-walled spheres and surgical 
rubber tubing used. Hundreds of combinations were tried. 
Since the resulting frequencies were all around 100 c/s or 
below, it was apparent that, to obtain a true picture, much 
deeper water would be necessary to study the device. For 
this reason all the later measurements were made in deep 
water at the NEL Pend Oreille Calibration Station in Idaho. 


Deep-Water Measurements 


As mentioned earlier, elaborate preparations were made 
to measure both the underwater spark source and the pneumatic 
device at various depths and to obtain as much high-speed 
photographic data as possible. The large rigging to accomplish 
this was shown in figures 9 and 10. Photographs of the 
phenomena connected with the oscillating bubble are shown in 
figure 33 which was taken 200 feet below the surface, and in 
figure 34 which was taken at a depth of 300 feet. These are 
thought to be the first pictures of such phenomena taken at 
such great depth. It will be noted that the sphere reaches 
the same external dimension regardless of the depth. This 
is because for a given initial diameter, wall thickness, and 
type of material, the spheres rupture at a nearly constant 
differential pressure. To date, the maximum depth at 
which measurements have been made is 600 feet. 

One important finding at the greater depths was that 
the air initially entrapped in the sphere and inflating line 
was compressed allowing the sphere to be forced into the 
inflating fitting, thus weakening a small area of the rubber 
wall prior to normal inflation. This problem was eliminated 
by making the ball on the end of the molding mandrel remov- 
able and allowing it to remain in the sphere. This provided 
several advantages since it eliminated the entrapped air 
and provided support to the inside of the sphere when it 
was under compression from the outside. The ball has 
not interfered with the inflation process. 


‘Oasul QOT AlTazewtxordde sem aouanbas jo 


uoTyeing “yydep }ooJ-90zZ }e Uaye} ‘ossyds GO Yourt-GLE “T 
wlortj juUauIdoTaANp atqqnq jo syderzsojoug ‘eg ainsi y 


56 


‘Oasw QQT Aleyewtxoidde sem aouanbas jo 


uoTyeing “yidep jooJ-00g ye uaxye, ‘atayds GO YOur-GLE “T 
WOT JUaUIdOTIASpP a[qqngq jo syudeirsojoug ‘FE sinstTy 


57 


58 


THE ACOUSTIC BOMB 


It is frequently desired to make sound transmission studies 
in the deep ocean. Because there are few sources that can 
generate substantial power, particularly in the very low fre- 
quency region below 1000 c/s, chemical explosives of various 
sizes are used for the study. This is not only a costly process, 
but involves considerable hazards. 

The pneumatic sound source is ideal for use as a sound 
bomb. It is safe, cheap to produce, and creates a substantial 
sound level at essentially a single low frequency which can be 
controlled. The sound pressure generated is a function of 
wall material and thickness. The frequency generated is a 
function of the depth at which the source is operated and of 
its initial physical dimension, 

The first model of the acoustic bomb consisted of a very 
simple pressure mechanism, a small cartridge of carbon 
dioxide, and a small length of surgical rubber tubing sealed 
off at the end (fig. 35), This mechanism worked satisfactorily 
to a depth of about 150 feet. 

Later versions of the acoustic bomb consist of Mark 15 
Mod 0, practice depth charge pressure mechanisms attached 
to flasks of compressed air or carbon dioxide, combined 
with specially designed elastic spheres of various sizes. 
Figure 36 shows one type used. 


OTHER NOVEL SOUND SOURCES 


CONVERSION OF HEAT TO SOUND 


With the advent of nuclear submarines there is an 
abundance of heat available which might be utilized in 
the generation of sound. A few simple experiments 
involving the principle of converting heat to sound were 
conducted as part of the Novel Sound Sources program 
and are reported briefly as a possible impetus to others 
to continue this approach. 

Carbon dioxide, or dry ice, at a critical point about 
-110°F, changes state from a solid toa gas. This 
phenomenon is known as ''subliming.'' If a metal object 
which is at or near room temperature is brought into 


Figure 35. Original model of acoustic bomb. 


Figure 36. Acoustic bomb using Mark 15 Mod 0 pressure 
mechanism. 


59 


60 


momentary contact with dry ice, it imparts considerable 
heat to it. This causes release of gas and considerable 
pressure at the point of contact, and the metal object will 
be set into vibration. Depending upon the shape and size 
of the vibrating object, sounds of various frequencies and 
surprisingly high levels are thus produced. Many varia- 
tions of this method of generating sound are possible. 
(This is a crude but effective method of testing vibrations 
in metals at very low temperatures.) The frequencies 
can be measured with a calibrated oscillator by means of 
Lissajous patterns. 


THE "WOLF WHISTLE" 


In this sound source a condition which is normally 
avoided as undesirable is intentionally put to use. It is 
well known to players of string instruments that under 
certain conditions beyond their control, a sympathetic 
resonance can occur between the vibrating string and the 
sound box. This undesired tone is call a ‘'wolf-tone."' 

In the ''wolf whistle'' sound source, the vibrating 
string is replaced by a more rugged vibrating body such 
as a small metal saw blade, steel clock-spring, reeds, rods, 
or bars. The vibration is started by placing the body in 
front of a jet of air or water. Varying the tension adjusts 
the frequency. ‘The vibrator is in turn placed at the open 
end of a resonant chamber which is sympathetically 
excited by the vibrating element. When the two frequencies 
are identical, the resulting sound is loud. The adjustable 
deflection plate can be used to control the intensity of the 
sound generated. The two variations of the ''wolf whistle"' 
shown in figure 37 have been operated in air but no under- 
water measurements have been made of their performance. 


Figure 37. The ''Wolf Whistle, '' (A) with vibrating blade in 
position; (B) with adjustable reeds in position. 


61 


62 


CONCLUSIONS 


I. THE UNDERWATER SPARK SOUND SOURCE 


1. An underwater spark is capable of providing very high 
intensity, broadband, nondirectional short pulses of acoustic 
energy. 

2. Resonators excited by an underwater spark are capable 

of providing selected frequencies or bands of frequencies 

of acoustic energy. 

3. The apparatus required for a high-powered underwater 
spark is suitable for assembly in a capsule for deep submer- 
sence: 

4. An underwater spark is useful in explosive metal forming. 


Il. THE PNEUMATIC SOUND SOURCE 


1. Small rubber spheres are capable of providing acoustic 
source levels of at least 107 db above 1 dyne/cm® at selected 
frequencies within the band 10 - 300 c/s. 

2. The frequency of a given pneumatic source can be con- 
trolled by selection of its depth at the time of rupture. 

3. The nature of the simple pneumatic source makes it 
appear useful in a variety of applications requiring a single 
pulse of selected frequency within its operating band. 


RECOMMENDATIONS 


I. THE UNDERWATER SPARK SOUND SOURCE 


1. Conduct tests with the underwater spark to determine its 
suitability for converting existing passive coastal defense 
systems into active systems. 

2. Conduct tests with the underwater spark to determine its 
suitability for converting existing submarine passive equip- 
ment into active echo- ranging equipment. 

3. Conduct tests with the underwater spark to determine the 
feasibility of obtaining desired directivity by use of suitable 
reflectors. 

4. Continue effort to determine the utility of the underwater 
spark in fields of oceanography, hydrography, and seismology. 
5. Continue effort to obtain improved materials for electrodes 
and gaps, as well as to determine possible upper power limits, 
utility of resonators, etc. 


Il. THE PNEUMATIC SOUND SOURCE 


1. Conduct tests to determine the usefulness of the pneumatic 
source in converting passive coastal arrays into active ones. 
2. Conduct tests to determine the usefulness of the pneumatic 
source in low-frequency echo- ranging operations from sub- 
marines, helicopters, etc. 
3. Conduct tests to determine the usefulness of the pneumatic 
source in other military applications, such as: 

a. Pre-cursor acoustic sweep in mine countermeasures 

b. Location of missile nose- cone water entry position 

c. Anti-limpeteer operations 

d. Submarine signalling 

e. Oceanography, seismology, etc. 
4. Continue effort to obtain improved materials and to deter- 
mine upper power and frequency limits. 


63 


BRE eRe ead NE cre thet ies opens) enya daisy: teal) io atnnec! ' 
LE aS Ud adie anal eal Ea eit dots boven cae 
1 Tee ee es os PEAR VOOR ine | eaiaee 

ee nabours OLN ¢ rad Peas Late v4 Y atsnts Saat Fi Wein Rete te ialytte 3 
QL RR eat i ail ot De Me ey ka) taht mw AW 
vs ena ‘di VARS NYLON Map tiatee ete eh mapel 
Te ese we “aledeai [ate Wwosive) SiGe ade ae auiamee yg 
tant ha Mi we A ne pp! (das Largely Mita nie ine mn Hy 


o 6 es Gy bi LW aye haba a mnt 


ue 


pe 


; ae Ong ay we 
fo beets ‘hye overs iced bee YS eee a 
aan ssa } sya whine cura tals Bike Cy et eae 


r Pash hoa RW saw ei yi: tg dec sob 2 oe i a Ree iotewaan: es Uris 


Ce ne ee hi oe igi hae sai elit cal 
Py Teens ev al stl it a ; Pe rns 


j ch Mt) Khaya Ae? 
; ag 


Pat ee 


eRe ke is i ah, 
Frias sehen inp! ete Len Rey pMlenwiihs © ash (98 ite top he Od 
Ci A Rd A ate tt abi Ne de balvuaeieserds Rem MET TY AAs OES ata ae | 
REO BO ii Raa tt: Uae: it ioptiots oat: Sahay ea lay Yh ‘ a ; 
Hike xsi at) pay igh Seni a ” ae oem A apis! : 
heen me ey :. eae Saeed pat | ‘a 
bn dies beth Shae Vn my Ba or eh pieme Paulin’ a 
as paral Manly “nha engpasiliny Tee atl ; 
eh P eee CPB oe eet yl ae 
a Wt: aie East ane ER voy od ine siti Paid: 
rons bs, ba ha pehie SRS Paghiahe 
i ett ‘ae iy wyS7 er eetin 

Cale. Wir ita erier ade! raf he Curae Pg 
spots dt has Eleltsiead havo nade ee a aga: 
: CEO ees ae ‘bhi a we ey 


Fare: Bho tds es 


G3ISISSVIONN ST P1Bd ST UL 


(¢-€1 TAN) 60 €0 ToOd-S 
Torzo SV 


‘ir ‘*y *T ‘31eqped 


yoivasay 
- syieds 1a,ealapun 


qoieasay - saainos 
- punos Ja }eAl1epUuN 


GAlSISSVIONN St pred StuL 


(g-€1 TAN) 60 €0 Tood-S 
Totzo SV 


"if ‘*y "7 ‘31aqped 


yoreasay 
- syieds 1a,earapun 


qyoreeasay - saoinos 
- punos I9j,e®alapun 


*AjZayiq paziodai pues paroydxa aie G3ISISSVIONN St Pre STOL 


s$a0InoS punoS Taaou 12430 “Suos Voy Tdde T8IF3083 


snolamnu JoJ aTqeayns pue ‘parpuegq ATTSsea 
‘[TtUs a1B sadTAap WOH “S/2 ODE 93 G JO aguel 
Aauanbary aq} Uy ‘UOTZTPUOD TeUOTIIaITpUOU 
B IOJ S31BM NOP 19AO JO TaAaT IF3Snooe yead B 
payeiauad seq yotga ‘a9Inos punos 973eunaud ay 
(z) pue {uot ypuod TeUOTZIaITpUOU PuegpeoIg B 
IOJ S1}8A UOTTITM ¢ JO SS9dKa UT TAAdT IT9SN0IB 
ue 03 Juptpuodsar109 sainssaid yead payerauad 
seq sqidap 3003-go¢ 38 yoTya ‘yIeds 1azea 
-Iapun aqi ([T) ‘:uotdaz Aduanbaiy-soy ayy ut asn 
Joy ATaatsuayxa pajysay pue padozaaap uaaq aaryq 
SaodInos punos Jajealapun AjyTsuaqyut-ysty oaZ 


(¢-¢1 TIN) $0 £0 ToOd-S 
ToTzo SV 


“ap ‘°y °7 ‘Saeqped 
Cal salSSvIoNnn 


"0961 129490390 44 ‘°d ¢9 yo1easay 
‘If ‘d1aqped “uy “1 Aq ‘S30NNOS GNNOS T3AON 


- syieds 12a, ea1apun 


066 }40deay yoievasay - saomnos 
440} 240) $91U04399,3 AACN - punos Ja}eazapun 


ST pied StyL 
*ATJaTIg pajyiodai pue paiotdxa aie GAlsISSVIONN SF P He 


s$a91noS punos [aaou 19410 “SuoTzeITTdde TeITI9e4 


snolamnu 1oJ aTqe3ytns pue ‘patpueg ATTsea (e-£1 TIN) 60 €0 ToOd-S 
‘]1eUS a1e sadTAap YI0H *S/2 OE 03 Gg JO adueI To1z0 SV 
Aauanbary ay. Ut ‘UOTZTPpUOD TeUuOTIIeITpUOU 
B IOJ S128 QOOP 19AM JO TaAaT IT3SnoOIe yead B 
pajyeiauad seq yotya ‘adInos punos 973emnaud ayy 
(Z) pue {UOT Tpuod TeUuOT,IaITpUoU pueqpeoIg B 
I0OJ S438M UOTTTTM ¢ JO SSadxa UT TaADT IT3SNOIe 
ue 03 dutpuodsaiiod sainssaid yead payerauad 
sey Ssyydap 100J-o0¢ 32 yotya ‘y1eds 193eA 
-Iapun 242 ([T) ‘:uotdar Aduanbary-aoy ayy uy asn 
Joy ATaatsuaixe paysay pue padoyaaap uaaq aaey 
SaoInos punos 1azeatapun AiTsuaqut-ysTy oaL 
‘if ‘"Y “1 ‘d1eqped 
@alsaiSsvionn 
“096 129490390 ut ‘*d ¢Qg yoieasay 


‘If ‘d1aqped “yu “1 Aq “sg0unoS aNnos JAN - syieds 19a, eAlapun 


qoreesay - sadinos 


4od 
066 }40d9y - punos 1a}ealapun 


440}241008) $51U01}99;3 AACN 


*Ayzatigq payiodar pus pazotdxa are 

8991n0S punos TaAoU 12430 ‘“SuoyzBoTTdde TB973983 

snoraunu Joy aTqeayns pues ‘patpueyq ATTsea 

‘{Teus a1B SadTAap 4208 “8/2 00€ 03 ¢ Jo aduti 

Aduanbaij aq} uy ‘UOTZTPUOD TeUOTIIeITpUON 

B JOJ $1224 OOOP 19AO JO TaAaT I79SN098 yead e@ 

payeiauad seq gotya ‘adInos punos aq3Bunaud 343 

(zZ) pue fuoTITpUoD TeUOTZIaITPUOU PUeqpeOIg & 

IOJ 8338 UOTTIT@ ¢ JO SSadxa UF TAAaT ITASNOIe 

ue 03 dutpuodsaiiod sainssaid yead pazeiauad 

sey syidap 1003-90¢ 32 yoTya ‘yieds 1a;ea 

-1apun a43 ([) ‘:uwoTdar Aduanbary-aot a3 UT asn 

Joy ATaATSuaXa paysay pue padotaaap uaaq aary 
Sd9In0sS punos Ia,eAlapun AjyTSuazuT-gsTy OA 


GalsaiSSvIONn 
°096T 12902390 ut ‘°d ¢9 


‘if ‘31aqped “HY “1 Aq ‘S30NNOS GNNOS W3AON 


066 340dey 
£40} e10qR] $21U01390(3 AACN 


*ATJatTig payiodal pues paroytdxa aie 

sao1nos punos [TaAou 139430 *suoTiBottdde [89729e2 
snolaunu JOJ atqeztNs pue ‘patpuey AyTTsea 

‘TTems aie sadTAIp Y0E *s/2 00€ 03 G JO aduei 
Aduanbary 042 ut ‘UOTRTPUOD TeUOTIIeITPUOU 

B JOJ $1228 OOOP 19A0 JO TaAaT IT9Sn0Ie yead e& 
payeiauad seq yotya ‘adInos punos otT2tunaud ayy 
(Z) pue {uoTITpuod TeUOTZIaITpuoOU pueqpeoIg e 

IOJ 8$332H UOTT{TU g JO SSa0Xa UT TAAaT ITISNOIe 


ue 03 dutpuodsaiiod sainssaid yead pazyeiauad 

sey sqzdap 1003-o0¢g 32 yotya ‘yIeds 133ea 

-19pun 943 ([T) :uotga1 Aduanbatj-aoT ag} Ut asn 
IoJ ATAATSUa}X9 paisa pue padozTaasp uaeaq aaey 


sa0inos punos Jaj3eaiapun AytTSuaquT-ysTY oa, 


GalsiSSVIONN 
"0961 1290399 ut ‘"d ¢9 


"If “d1aqped “Y “1 Aq “S30UNOS GNNOS T3AON 


066 }40dey 
A40YVIOQE] S51U0139919 AACN 


Chief, Bureau of Ships (Code 335) 
(Code 670) (Code 673) (Code 688) (6) 
Chief, Bureou of Noval Weapone (DLI-3) (OLI-31) (2) 
(RUDC-2) (2) (RUDC-1)) 
Chief of Noval Personnel 
(Technical Librory) 


Chief of Noval Operations (Op-73) (2) (Op-07T) 
Op-03EG) 

Chief of Naval Research 
Code 41? (Code 455) (Code 461) 
Code 466 


Commonder In Chief, U. S$. Pacific Floet 
Commonder in Chief, U. $. Atlantic Fleet 
Commander Operational Test and Evaluation Farce, 
U. S. Allantic Fleet 
Commander: Crulser-Destroyer Force, U. S, Pacific 
jee! 
Commonder, Destroyer Force, U. $. Atlontic Fleet 
Commonder Submarine Force, U. $. Pacific Fleet 
Commonder Submarine Force, U. S. Allantic Fleet 
Commander Training Command, U. S$. Pacific Flee? 
Commander Submarine Development Group TWO 
Commander, Service Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet 
(Library) 
Commonder, Service Force, U. $. Atlontle Fleet 
Commonder Key West Test & Evaluation Detachment 
Commonder, U.$. Noval Alr Developmen! Center 


(Library) 

Commander, U. $. Noval Missile Center 
(Code 5340) 
Technical tibrary) 


Commander, U. $. Naval Ordnance laboratory 
(library) (2) 

Commander, U. $. Navol Ordnance Test Station, 
(Pasodeno Annex Libro 

Commander, U. S$. Naval 
Chino toke (Code 733) 
(Technical Director) 

Commander, Charleston Noval Shipyard 

Commander, Porismouth Naval Shipyard 

Commander, Puge? Sound Noval S$ levees 

Commanding Officer and Director, David Taylor 
Model Basin (brary) 

Commanding Officer and Director, U. $. Naval 
Engineering Experiment Station (library) 

Commanding Officer and Director, U. S. Navy Mine 
Defense laboratory (Code 712) 


) 
tdnonce Test Station 


INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST 


(One copy fo each addressee unless otherwise specified) 


Commanding Officer ond Director, U. $. Naval 
Training Device Center 

Commonding Officer ond Director, U. S. Navy 

Underwater Sound laboratory (Code 1450) (3) 

Commonding Officer ond Director, U. S. Atlantic Fleet, 
ASW Tactical School , 

Director, U. $. Novol Research Laborato: 
(Code 2027) (2) (Code 53120) 

Director, U. S$. Navy Underwoter Sound Reference 
loboratery (Library) 

Commonding Officer, Alr Development Squadron 
ONE (VX-1) 

Commanding Officer, U.$. Fleet Sonar School, 
Koy Weal 

Commanding Officer, U.S. Fleet Sonar School, 
Son Diego 

Commonding Officer, U.$. Naval Underwater 
Ordnance Stotion 

Commanding Officer, Office of Novol Reseorch, 
Posaodena Branch 

Commonding Officer, 
New london 

Officer In Charge, U. $. Noval Medical Research 
loboratory 

Hydrographer, U.$. Navy Hydrographic Office 
(Division of Oceanography) 
(Library) 

Senior Novy Ulalson Officer, U. $. Navy Electronics 
Llaison Office 

Superintendent, U. $. Naval Postgraduate School 
(library) (2) 

Novy Representative, Project LINCOLN, 
Massochusetts Institute of Technology 

Assiston! Secretary of the Navy, Research ond 
Development 

Depariment of Defense, Director of Defense Research 
and Engineering (Tech. Library) 

Assistont Chief of Staff, G-2, U.S. Army (Document 
Ubrary Branch) (3) 

Commonding General, Army Electronic Proving 
Ground echnical librory) 

Commonding General, Redstone Arsenal 
(Technicol Library) 

Rosident Member, Beach Erosion Board, Corps of 
Engineers, U.S. Army 


Commander, Alr Defense Command 
(Office of Operations Analysis) 


U.S. Novol Submorine Bose, 


Commander, Air University (Alr University Library, 
CR-5028) 

Commonder, Alr Force Cambridge Research Center 

(CRQSL-1) 

Commonder, Rome Alr Development Center 
(RCRES-4C) 

Commonder, Holloman Alr Force Bose (MDGRT) 

University of California, Director, Marine Physical 
loboratory, San Diego, California 

University of California, Director, Scripps Institution 
of Oceanogrophy (Library), la Jolla, California 


VIA BUREAU OF SHIPS: 


Natlonol Research Council (Committes on Undersoa 
Warfare, Exocutive Secretary, George Wood) (2) 
Brown University, Director, Research Analysis Group 

Pennsylvania State University, Director, 
Ordnance Research Laboratory 
The University of Texas 
Director, Defonse Research laboratory 
Militory Physics Loboratory (Dr, R. B. Watson) 
University of Woshington, Director, Applied Phyalcs 
laboratory (Or, J. E. Henderson) 


weeeThe Director, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 


Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated, Murray 
Hill, New Jersoy 

Bendix Aviation Corp., North Hollywood, California 

Edo Corporation, long Island 

Goneral Electric Compony, Syracuse, Now York 

Raytheon Mfg. Company, Wayland, Massachusetts 

Songomo Electric Company, Springfield, Illinols 


Via Commanding Officer, ONR New York Branch 
loboratory of Marine Physics, Now Haven, Conn. 
Columbia University, Director, Hudson Laboratorios 

Dobbs Ferry, Now York 

Via Commonding Officer, ONR Boston Branch 
Horvord University, Director, Acoustics Research 

laboratory, Dr. F. V. Hunt 

Via ONR Resident Representative, University 
of Michigan 

University of Michigan (Director, University of 
Michigon Research Institute)