Skip to main content

Full text of "Observations on the nature of civil liberty, the principles of government, and the justice and policy of the war with America : to which is added, an appendix, containing a state of the national debt, an estimate of the money drawn from the public by the taxes, and an account of the national income and expenditure since the last war"

See other formats


UNIVERSITY 

OF  PITTSBURGH 

LIBRARY 


<c$&£x 


#V W%  :<$> 


7  /78^ 


^ 


Dar.Rm. 

E211 

P9U6 


THIS  BOOK  PRESENTED  BY 

Buhl  Foundation 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2010  with  funding  from 

University  of  Pittsburgh  Library  System 


http://www.archive.org/details/observationsonnaOOinpric 


OBSERVATIONS 

ON       THE 

NATURE 

O   F 

CIVIL    LIBERTY, 

THE 

PRINCIPLES 

O    F 

GOVERNMENT, 

AND       THE 

JUSTICE    and    POLICY 

OF       THE 

WAR    with    AMERICA. 

TO    WHICH     IS    ADDED, 
A  N 

APPENDIX, 

CONTAINING 

A  State  of  the  National  Debt,  an  Eftimate  of  the  Money 
drawn  from  the  Public  by  the  Taxes,  and  an  Account  of  the 
National  Income  and  Expenditure  fince  the  laft  War. 


Heu  mijeri  elves  ;  turn  Hojiem,  i mini  c  a  que  co/ira* 
Vellra*  Spes  uritis.  ViRG, 

„_l_„ lau 


B  y    R  I  C  H  A  R  D     P  R  I  C  E,    D.  D.    F.  R.  S. 


LONDON   Printed,   1776.      I 

PHILADELPHIA: 

Re  printed  and  Sold  by  J  O  H  N    D  U  N  L  A  P,  at  the  Newft 

Printing-Office,  in  Market-Street. 

MDCCLXXV* 


-V; 


+*++*******+♦+**+****♦♦+♦****♦♦♦**♦*♦♦**♦*+* 


ADVERTISEMENT. 


T  N  the  following  Obfervations,  I  have  taken  that  liberty  of  ex- 
**  amining  public  meafures,  which,  happily  for  this  kingdom, 
every  per/an  in  it  enjoys.  They  contain  the  Jentiments  of  a  private 
and  unconnected  man  ;  for  which,  Jhould  there  be  any  thing  tvrong 
in  them,  he  alone  is  anfwerable. 

After  all  that  has  been  written  on  the  difpute  with  America,  no 
reader  can  expect  to  be  informed,  in  this  publication,  of  much  that 
he  "has  not  before  known.  Perhaps,  however,  he  may  find  in  it 
Jome  new  matter  ;  and  if  he  Jhould,  it  will  be  chiefly  in  the  Obser- 
vations on  the  Nature  of  Civil  Liberty,  and  the  Policy  of  the  War 
with  America ;  and  in  the  Appendix. 


♦^♦*****f**f**4^**^^******->***4'***4^***4*<l*** 


c 


(    3    ) 


OBSERVATIONS,    <&c. 


OU  R  Colonies  in  North  America  appear  to  be 
now  determined  to  do  and  fuffer  every  thing, 
under  the  perfuafion,  that  Great  Britain  is 
attempting  to  rob  them  of  that  Liberty  to  which 
every  member  of  fociety,  and  all  civil  communities,  have  a 
natural  and  unalienable  right.  The  queftion,  therefore, 
whether  this  is  a  reafonable  perfuafion,  is  highly  interefting, 
and  deferves  the  moft  careful  attention  of  every  Englijhman  who 
values  Liberty,  and  wifhes  to  avoid  ftaining  himfelf  with  the 
guilt  of  invading  it.  But  it  is  impoiTible  to  judge  properly  of 
this  queftion  without  correct  ideas  of  Liberty  in  general;  and 
of  the  nature,  limits,  and  principles  of  Civil  Liberty  in  parti- 
cular.  The  following  obfervations  on  this  fubjedr,  appear 

to  me  imoortanf,  as  well  as  juft;  and  1  cannot  make  myfelf 
ea(y  without  offering  them  to  the  public  at  the  prefent  period, 
big  with  events  of  the  laft  confequence  to  this  kingdom.  I 
do  this,  with  reluctance  and  pain,  urged  by  itrong  feelings, 
but  at  the  fame  time  checked  by  the  confeioufnefs  that  r  am 
likely  to  deliver  fentiments  not  favourable  to  the  prefent 
meafures  of  that  government,  under  which  I  live,  and  to  which 
I  am  a  conftant  and  zealous  weil-wifher.  Such,  however, 
are  my  prefent  fentiments  and  views,  that  this  is  a  confidera- 
tion  of  inferior  moment  with  me;  and,  as  I  hope  never  to  go 
beyond  the  bounds  of  decent  difcuffion  and  expoftulation,  I 
flatter  myfelf,  that  I  (hall  be  able  to  avoid  giving  any  perf<  n 
juft  caufe  of  offence. 

The  obfervations  with  which  I  ftiall  begin,  are  of  a  more 
general  and  abftradted  nature;  but  being,  in  my  opinion,  of 
particular  confequence;  and  neceflary  to  introduce  what  I 
have  principally  in  view,  I  hope  they  will  be-  patiently  read 
and  confidered. 

SECTION, 


i    4    ) 
SECTION        L 

Of  the  Nature  of  Liberty  in  General. 

N  order  to  obtain  a  more  diftincl:  and  accurate  view  of  the 
nature  of  Liberty   as  fuch,  it  will  be  ufeful  to  confider  it 
under  the  four  following  general  divifions. 

Firft,  Phyfical  Liberty. Secondly,    Moral  Liberty. 

Thirdly,  Religious  Liberty. And  Fourthly,  Civil  Liberty. 

Thefe  heads  comprehend  under   them    all   the   different 

kinds  o(  Liberty.  And  I  have  placed  Civil  Liberty  lair,  be* 
caufe  I  mean  to  apply  to  it  all  I  ihail  foy  of  the  other  hinds  of 
Liberty. 

By  Physical  Liberty  I  mean  that  principle  of  Sponta- 
neity, or  Self  determination,  which  conditutes  us  Agents  ;  or 
which  gives  us  a  command  over  our  actions,  rendering  them 
properly  ours,  and  not  effects  of  the  operation  of  any  foreign 
caufe.  Moral  Liberty  is   the   power  of  following,    in 

all  circumftances,  our  fenfe  of  right  and  wrong  ;  or  of  acting 
in  conformity  to  our  reflecting  and  moral  principles,  with- 
out being  controuled  by  any  contrary  principles,— Reli- 
gious Liberty  (tgnifies  the  power  of  exercifing,  without 
rooleitation,  that  mode  of  religion  which  we  think  beft;  of 
of  maicing  the  decilions  of  our  own  confeiences,  refpedjin* 
religious  truth,  the  rule  of  our  conduct,  2nd  not  any  of  the 
decilions  of  others.  In  like  manner;  Civil  Liberty  is 
the  power  of  a  Civil  Society  or  State  to  govern  itfelf  by  its  own 
difcretion  ;  or  by  laws  of  its  own  making,  without  being  fub- 
jecl  to  any  foreign  difcretion,  or  to  the  impoiitions  of  any 
extraneous  will  or  power. 

It  Ihould  be  obferved,  that,  according  to  thefe  definitions 
of  the  different  kinds  of  liberty,  there  is  one  general  idea,  that 
runs  through  them  all  ;    1  mean,   the  idea  of  Self -direction,  or 

Self  government. Did   our  volitions  originate  not  with  our- 

/elves,  but  wi<h  lome  caule  over  which  we  have  no  power;  or 
were  we  under  a  neceility  of  always  following  fome  will  differ- 
ent from  our  own,  we  fhould  want  Physical  Liberty. 

Jn  like  manner;  he  wh.de  perceptions  of  moral  obligation 
are  conrrouled  by  his  paflions  has  loft  his  Moral  Liberty,  and 
the  molt  common  language  applied  to  him  is,  that  he  wants 
Self -government,      ■     ■ 

He 


«     5    ) 

He  likewife  who,  in  religion,  cannot  govern  himfelf  by  his 
conviclions  of  religious  duty,  but  is  obliged  to  receive  for- 
mularies of  faith,  and  to  pra£f.ife   modes  of  worfhip  impofed 

upon  him   by   others,    wants  Religious  Liberty. And  the 

Community  alfo  that  is  governed,  not  by  itfeU,  but  by  fome 
will  independent  of  it,  and  over  which  it  has  no  controul 
wants  Civil  Liberty. 

In  all  thefe  cafes  there  is  a  force  which  {lands  oppofed  to 
the  agent's  own  will ;  and  which,  as  far  as  it  operates,  produces 

Servitude. .'n  the  firlr.  cafe,  this  force  is  incompatible  with 

the  very  idea  of  voluntary  motion  ;  and  the  fubject  of  it  is  a 
mere  paflive   inflrument  which    never  O&s,  but  is  always  acled 

upon. —In  the  fecond  cafe;    this   force   is  the  influence  of 

paffion  getting  the  better  of  reafon  ;  or  the  brute  overpowering 

and  conquering  the  will  of  the  man. in  the  third  cafe;  it 

is  Human  Authority  in  religion  requiring  conformity  to  parti- 
cular modes  of   faith   and   worihip,    and   fuperfedin?  private 

judgment. And  in  the  laft  cafe,  it  is  any  will  difrinc-i  from 

that  of  the  Majority  of  a  Community,  which  claims  a  power 
of  making  laws  for  it,  and  difpoung  of  its  property. 

This  it  is,  I  think,  that  marks  the  limit,  or  that  lays  the  line 
between  Liberty  and  Slavery.  As  far  as,  in  any  inftance,  the 
operation  of  any  caufe  comes  in  to  reftrain  the  power  of  Self- 
government,  fo  far  flavery  is  introduced  :  Nor  do  I  think  that 
a  precifer  idea  than  this  of  Liberty  and  Slavery  can  be  formed. 
I  cannot  help  wifning  1  could  here  fix  my  reader's  attention, 
and  engage  him  to  confider  carefully  the  dignity  of  that  bleHin^- 
to  which  we  give  the  name  of  Lieerty,  according  to  the  repre- 
sentation now  made  of  it.  There  is  not  a  word  in  the  whole 
compafs  of  language  which  exprefles  fo  much  of  what  is  im- 
portant and  excellent.     It  is,  in    every  view  of  it,   a  bleflino; 

truly  facred  and  invaluable. Without  Phyfical  Liberty,  man 

would  be  a  machine  ailed  upon  by  mechanical  fprings,  having 
no  principle  of  motion  in  himfelf  or  command  over  events"} 
and,  therefore,  incapable  of  all  merit  and  demerit.- With- 
out Moral  Liberty  he  is  a  wicked  and  detcftable  being,  fubje£i 
to  the  tyranny  of  bafe  lufts,  and  rhe  fport  of  every  vile  appetite, 
—  --And  without  Religious  and  Civil  Liberty  he  is  a  poor  and 
abject  animal,  without  rights,  wsthour  property,  and  without 
a  confeience,  bending  his  neck  to  the  yoke,  and  crouching  to 
the  will  of  every  filly  creature  who  has  'the  fnfolence  to  pretend 
to  authority  over  him. ---Nothing,  therefore,  can  be  of  fo  much 

confequence 


,. (  6  ) 

confequence   to  us  as  Liberty.     It  is  the  foundation  of  all  ho- 
nour, and  the  chief  privilege  and  glory  of  our  natures. 

In  fixing  our  ideas  on  the  fubjecl  of  Liberty  it  is  of  particu- 
lar life  to  take  fuch  an  enlargeJ  view  of  it  as  I  have  now  given. 
But  the  immediate  object  of  the  prefent  enquiry  being  Civil 
Liberty,  I  will  confine  to  it  all  the  fubfequent  obfervations. 


SECT.     IT. 

Of  Civil  Liberty  and  the  Principles  of  Government. 

T"p  R  O  M  what  has  been  faid,  it  is  obvious,  that  all  civil 
Jp  government,  as  far  as  it  can  be  denominated  free,  is  the 
creature  of  the  people.  It  originates  with  them.  It  is  con* 
iju£ted  under  their  direction;  and  has  in  view  nothing  but 
:heir  happinefs.  AH  its  different  forms  are  no  more  than  fo 
manv   different  modes    in    which    they  chufe  to  direct   their 

affairs,  and  to  fecure  the  quiet  enjoyment  of  their  rights. 

In  every  hee  irate  every  man  is  his  own  le^iflator. All  taxes 

a're  (:ee.  gifts  for  public  fervices. — All  laws  are  particular  pro- 
v'ilons   or  regulations   eftabSifhed    by    common"  consent  for 

fining  protection   and    fafety. And   all  Magijirates  are 

Truitees  or  Deputies  for  carrying  thefe  regulations  in:o 
execution. 

Liberty,  therefore,  is  too  imperfectly  defined  when  it  is  faid 
co  be  cv  a  Government  by  Laws,  and  not  by  Men."  If  the 
laws  are  made  by  one  man,  or  a  junto  of  men  in  a  (rate,  and 
pftt  by  common  consent,  a  government  by  them  docs  not 
differ  from  Slavery.  In  this  cafe  it  Would  be  a  contradiction 
in  terms  to  fay  that  the  (rate  governs  itfelf. 

From  hence  it  is  obvious  that  Civil  Liberty,  in  its  mod  per* 
fc£t  degree,  can  be  enjoyed  only  in  ffitall  urates,  where  every 
roesribei  is 'capable  of  giviwg  his  mffrage  in  perfon,  and  of  being 
ciio&n  into  puhlk  offices.  When  a  Hate  becomes  fo  numerous, 
or  when  the  d iff --rent  parts  of  it  are  removed  to  fuch  diltances 
from  one  another,  ae  to  render  this  impracticable,  a  diminution 
or  Liberty  neeefiattly  arifes.  Theie  are  however,  in  theft 
tirctim&anceK,  methods  by  which  fuch  near  approaches  may 
b.-  made  to  perfect  Liberty  as  ihall  anfwer  ail  the  purpofes  of 
tovernment,  and  at  the  fame  time  fecure  every  right  ot  human 

feature. 

The/ 


(     7     ) 

Tho*  all  the  members  of  a  ftate  fhould  not  be  capable  of 
giving  their  fuffrages  on  public  meafures  indr^i  dually  and  per- 
finally y  they  may  do  this  by  the  appointment  or  Siib/lituies  or 
Representatives.  They  may  entruft  the  powers  of  leg  illation, 
fubjecr.  to  fuch  reftrictions  as  they  fhali  think  neceffarv,  with 
any  number  of  Delegates ;  and  whatever  can  be  done  by  fuch 
delegates,  within  the  limits  of  their  truft,  may  be  ccnfidered  2s 

done  by  the  united  voice  and  counfel  of  the  Community. 

In  this  method  a  free  government  may  be  efbblifhcd  in  a  large 
ftate;  and  it  is  conceivable  that  by  regulations  of  this  kind, 
any  number  of  ftates  might  be  fubjecled  to  a  fcheme  of  go- 
vernment, that  would  exclude  the  defoliations  of  war,  and 
produce  univerfal  peace  and  order. 

Let  us  think   here  of  what  may  be  practicable  in  this  way 

with  refpec-t  to  Europe  in  particular. While  it  continues 

divided,  as  it  is  at  prefent,  into  a  great  number  of  independent 
kingdoms,  whofe  interefts  are  continually  ciafhing,  it  is  im- 
poffible  but  that  difputes  will  often  arife  wnich  muft  end  in 
war  and  carnage.  It  would  be  no  remedy  to  this  evil  to 
make  one  of  thefe  ftates  fupreme  over  the  reft;  and  to  give  ic 
an  abfolute  plenitude  of  power  to  fuperintend  and  controul 
them.  This  would  be  to  fubjeft  all  the  ftates  to  the  arbitrary 
difcretion  of  one,  and  to  eftablifh  an  ignominious  flavery  noc 
poihble  to  be  long  endured,  it  would,  therefore,  be  a  remedy 
wcrfe  than  the  difeafe;  nor  is  it  poflible  it  mould  be  approved 
by  any  mind  that  has  not  loft  every  idea  of  Civil  Liberty.  On 
the  contrary— Let  every  ftate,  with  refpeel  to  all  its  internal 
concerns,  be  continued  independent  of  all  the  reft  ;  and  let  a  ge- 
neral confederacy  be  formed  by  the  appointment  of  a  Senate 
coniifting  of  Representatives  from  all  the  different  ftates. 
Let  this  Senate  poflefs  the  power  of  managing  all  the  common 
concerns  of  the  united  ftates,  and  of  judging  and  deciding 
between  them,  as  a  common  Arbiter  or  Umpire,  in  all  difputes  ; 
having,  at  the  fame  time,  under  its  direction,  the  common 

force  of  the  ftates  to  fupport  its  decifions. In  thefe  cir- 

cumftances,  each  feparate  ftate  would  be  fecure  againft  the 
interference  of  foreign  power  in  its  private  concerns,  and, 
therefore  would  poflefs  Liberty  ;  and  at  the  fame  time  it  would 
be  fecure  againft  all  oppreilion  and  infult  from  every  neighbour- 
ing ftate.* Thus  might  the  fcattered  force  and  abilities  of 

a  whole  continent  be  gathered  into  one  point;  all  litigations 
fettled  as  they  rofe ;  univerfal  peace  preierved ;  and  nation 
prevented  from  any  more  lifting  up  a  (word  agaivfl  nation. 

I  have 


C     8     ) 

.  1  have  obferved,  that  tho',  in  a  great  (late,  all  the  "indivi- 
duals that  compofe  it  cannot  he  admitted  to  an  immediate 
participation  in  the  powers  of  legiflation  and  government, 
yet  they  may   participate  in    thefe  powers   by  a  delegation  of 

them  to  ,1  body  of  reprefencatives. In  this  cafe  it  is  evident 

that  the  ftate  will  be  ftill  free  or  f elf -governed;  and  that  ic 
will  be  more  or  lefs  fo  in  proportion  as  it  is  more  or  lefs  fairly 
and  adequately  represented*  If  the  perfons  to  whom  the  fruit 
of  government  is  commuted  hold  their  places  for  fhort  terms; 
if  they  are  chofen  by  the  unbiafted  voices  of  a  majoriry  of  the 
ftate,  and  fubjedt  to  their  inliructions ;  Liberty  will  be  en- 
jo. ed  in  its  higheft  decree.  But  if  they  are  chofen  for  long 
terms  by  a  part  only  of  the  ftate  ;  and  if  during  that  term 
they  are  fubjedt  to  no  coniroul  from  their  conftituents  ;  the 
very  idea  of  Liberty  will  be  loft,  and  the  power  of  chufing 
conftituents  becomes  nothing  but  a  power,  lodged  in  a  few, 
to  chuie  at  certain  periods,  a  body  of  Mafiers  for  themfelves 
and  the  reft  of  the  Community.  And  it  a  ftate  is  fo  funk 
that  :he  body  of  its  reprefematives  are  ekcled  by  a  handful  of 
the  meaneft  •  perfons  in  it,  whofe  votes  are  always  paid  for  ; 
and  if  alio,  there  is  a  higher  will  on  which  even  thefe  mock 
representatives  themfelves  depend,  and  that  directs  their  voices ; 
In  thefe  circumftances,  it  will  be  an  abufe  of  language  to  fay 
that  the  ftate  poffeftes  Liberty.  Private  men,  indeed,  might 
be  allo»vVed  the  exercife  of  Liberty  ;  as  they  might  alfo  under 
the  moft  despotic  government ;  but  it  would  be  an  indulgence 
or  connivance  derived  from  the  fpirit  of  the  times,  or  from  an 
accidental  mildnefs  in  the  adminiftration.  And,  rather  than 
be  governed  in  fuch  a  manner,  it  w>u!d  perhaps  b?  better  to  be 
governed  by  the  will  of  one  man  without  any  reprefentation  : 
For  a  reprefentation  fo  degenerated  could  anfwer  no  other 
end  than  to  miflead  and  deceive,  by  difguifing  fhvery,  and 
keeping  up  a  form  of  Liberty  when  the  reality  was  loft. 

Within  the  limits  now  mentioned,  Liberty  may  be  enjoyed 
in  every  poffible  degree ;  from  that  which  is  complete  and 
perfect,  to  that  which  is  merely  nominal  ;  according  as  the 
peop!e  have  more  or  lefs  of  a  fhare  in  government,  and  of  a 
controuling  power  ovei  the  perfons  by  whom  it  is  adminiftered, 

In 

*  In  Great-Britain,  confifting  of  near  fix  millions  of  inhabitants,  57*3  Pr- 
ions, moft  of  them  the  !o«cft  of  the  people,  eledt  one  half  of  the  Houfe  of  Com- 
mons ;  and  3C4  votes  chufc  a  ninth  part.  This  may  he  fee*  diftinftly  made  out 
in  the  Political  Dijpijitions,  Vol.  I.  Book  *,  C.  4  a  work  (allot  important  and 
n&ful  jnttru£tion. 


(     9     ) 

In  general,  to  be  free  is  Co  be  guided  by  one's  own  wilf; 
and  to  be  guided  by  the  will  of  another  is  the  characleriftic 
of  Servitude.  This  is  particularly  applicable  to  Political 
Liberty.  That  ftate,  I  have  obferved,  is  free,  which  is  guided 
by  its  own  will;  or,  (which  comes  to  the  fame)  by  the  will 
of  an  ailembly  of  reprefentatives  appointed  by  itfelf  and  ac- 
countable to  itfelf.  And  every  ftate  that  is  not  fo  governed  ; 
Or  in  which  a  body  of  men  reprefenting  the   people   make  not 

an  eiTential  part  of  the  Legiflature,  is  in  jlaverp In  order 

to  form  the  m'oit  perfe£t  conftitution  of  government,  there 
may  be  the  beft  reafons  for  joining  to  fuch  a  body  of  reprefen- 
tatives, an  Hereditary  Council^  confiding  of  men  of  the  fir  ft 
rank,  in  the  ftate,  with  a  Supreme  executive  Magijlrate  at  the 
head  of  ail.  This  will  form  ufeful  checks  in  a  legiflature  -y 
and  contribute  to  give  it  vigour,  union,  tnd  difpatch,  with- 
out infringing  liberty  :  for,  as  long  as  that  part  af  a  govern- 
ment which  reprefents  the  people  is  a  fair  reprefentation  ;  and 
alfo  has  a  negative  on  all  public  meafures,  together  with  the 
fole   power  of  impofing   taxes   and  originating   fupplies  ;  the 

eftentials   of  liberty  will  be  preferved.-- We  make  it  our 

boaft  in  this  country,  that  this  is  our  own  conftitution.  I  will 
not  fay  with  how  much  reafon. 

Of  fuch  Liberty  as  I  have  now  defcribed,  it  is  impoiTible 
that  there  fliould  be  an  excels.  Government  is  an  inftitution 
for  the  benefit  of  the  people  governed,  which  they  have 
power  to  model  as  they  pleafe ;  and  to  fay,  that  they  can 
have  too  much  of  this  power  is  to  fay,  that  there  ought  to  be  a 
power  in  the  ftate   fuperior  to  that  which  gives  it  being,  and 

from  which  all  jurifdiclion  in  it  is  derived. Licentioufnefs, 

which  has  been  commonly  mentioned,  as  an  extreme  of  liber- 
ty, is  indeed  its  oppoiite.  It  is  government  by  the  will  of 
rapacious  individuals,  in  oppofition  to  the  will  of  the  com- 
munity, made  knovvn  and  declared  in  the  laws.  A  free  ftate, 
at  the  fame  time  that  it  is  free  itfelf,  makes  all  its  mem- 
bers free  by  excluding  licentioufnefs,  and  guarding  their 
perfons  and  property  and  good  name  againft  infult.  It  is  the 
end  of  all  juft  government,  at  the  fame  time  that  it  fecures  the 
liberty  of  the  public  again  ft  foreign  injury,  to  fecure  the  liberty 
of  the  individual  againft  private  injury.  I  do  not,  therefore, 
think  it  ftrictly  juft  to  fay,  that  it*  belongs  to  the  nature  of 
government  to  entrench  on  private  liberty.  It  ought  never 
to  do  this,    except  as   far   as   the  exercife  of  private  liberty 

J>  encroaches 


(      io     ) 

encroaches  on  the  liberties  of  others.  That  is,  it  is  licentioufnefs 
it  reftfains,  and  liberty  itfelf  only  when  ufed  to  deftroy  liberty. 

It  appears  from  hence,  that  licentioufnefs  and  defpotifm  are 
more  nearly  allied  than  is  commonly  imagined.  They  are 
both  alike  inconfiftent  with  liberty,  and  the  true  end  of  go- 
vernment; nor  is  there  any  other  difference  between  them, 
than  that  the  one  is  the  licentioufnefs  of  great  men,  and  the 
other  the  licentioufnefs  of  little  men  ;  or  that,  by  the  one,  the 
perfons  and  property  of  a  people  are  fubjeel  to  outrage  and 
invafion  from  the  king;  or  a  lawlefs  body  of  Grandees ;  and 
that,  by  the  others,   they  are  fubject  to  the  like  outrage  from 

a  lawlefs  mob.- In  avoiding  one   of  thefe  evils,  mankind 

have  often  run  into  the  other.  But  all  well-conflituterl 
governments  guard  equally  againfl  both.  Indeed  of  the  two, 
'the  Jaft  is,  on  feveral  accounts,  the  leaft  to  be  dreaded,  and 
has  done  the  leaif.  mifchief.  It  may  be  truly  laid,  that  if 
licentioufnefs  has  deftroyed  its  thoufands,  defpotifm  has  de- 
ftrcyed  its  millions.  The  former,  having  little  power,  and 
no  fyftem  to  fupport  it,  neceffarily  finds  its  own  remedy  ; 
and  a  people  foon  get  out  of  the  tumult  and  anarchy  attending 
it.  But  a  defpotifm,  wearing  the  form  of  government,  and 
being  armed  with  its  force,  is  an  evil  not  to  be  conquered 
without  dreadful  ftruggles.  It  goes  on  from  age  to  age,  de- 
bafmg   the    human    faculties,    levelling    all   diltinctions,    and 

preying  on  the  rights  and  bleffings  of  fociety. It  deferves 

to  be  added,  that  in  a  ftate  difturbed  by  licentioufnefs,  there 
is  an  animation  which  is  favourable  to  the  human  mind,  and 
which  puts  it  upon  exerting  its  powers.  But  in  a  ftate  habi- 
tuated to  a  defpotifm,  all  is  flill  and  torped.  A  dark  and 
lavage  tyranny  ftiflcs  every  effort  of  genius ;  and  the  mind  lofes 
all  its  fpirit  and  dignity. 

Before  I  proceed  to  what  I  have  farther  in  view,  I  will 
obferve,  that  the  account  now  given  of  the  principles  of  public 
Liberty,  and  the  nature  of  an  equal  and  free  government, 
{hews  what  judgment  we  fhould  form  of  that  omnipotence, 
which,  it  has  been  faid,  muft  belong  to  every  government  as 
fuch.      Great  (irefs  has  been  laid  on  this,  but  mofl:  unreafona- 

bly. Government,  as  has  been  before  obferved,   is,  in  the 

very  nature  of  it,  a  Trust;  and  all  its  powers  a  delega- 
tion for  gaining  particular  ends.  This  trtijl  may  be  mis- 
applied and  abufed.  It  may  be  employed  to  defeat  the  very 
ends  for  which  it  was  inftitutcd  ;    and   to  fubvert  the  very 

rights 


(  «  ) 

rights  vhich  it  ought  to  protecl A  Parliament,  for 

inftance,  confiding  of  a  body  of"  reprefentatives,  chofen  for  a 
limited  period,  to  make  laws,  and  to  grant  money  for  public 
fervices,  would  forfeit  its  authority  by  making  itfelf  perpetual, 
or  even  prolonging  its  own  duration  ;  by  nominating  its  own 
members;  by  accepting  bribes;  or  fubjec~ting  itfelf  to  any 
kind  of  foreign  influence.  This  would  convert  a  Parliament 
into  a  conclave  cr  junto  of  felf-created  tools;  and  a  ftate  that 
has  loft  its  regard  to  its  own  rights,  fo  far  as  to  fubmit  to  fuch. 
a  breach  of  truft  in  its  rulers,  is  enflaved. Nothing,  there- 
fore, can  be  more  abfurd  than  the  dccrrine  which  fome  have 
taught,  with  refpe£t  to  the  omnipotence  of  parliaments.  They 
pofiefs  no  power  beyond  the  limits  of  the  truft  for  the  executi- 
on of  which  they  were  formed.  If  they  contradict  this  truft, 
they  betray  their  conftitucnts,  and   difiblve    themfeives.      All 

delegated    power  muft   be   fubordinate   and   limited. If 

omnipotence  can,  with  any  fenfe,  be  afcribed  to  a  legislature, 
it  muft  be  lodged  where  all  legislative  authority  originates  ; 
that  is,  in  the  People.  For  their  fakes  government  is  infti- 
tuted  ;  and  their's  is  the  only  real  omnipotence. 

I  am  fenfible,  that  all  1  have  been  faying  would  be  very 
abfurd,  were  the  opinions  juft  which  fome  have  maintained 
concerning  the  origin  of  government.  According  to  thefe 
opinions,  government  is  not  the  creature  of  the  people,  or  the 
refult  of  a  convention  between  them  and  their  rulers :  But 
there  are'  certain  men  who  pofTefs  in  themfeives,  indepen- 
dently of  the  will  of  the  people,  a  right  of  governing  them, 
which  they  derive  from  the  Deity.  This  doclrine  has  been 
abundantly  refuted  by  many  *  excellent  writers.  It  is  a  doc- 
trine which  avowedly  fubverts  Civil  Liberty;  and  which 
reprefents  mankind  as  a  body  of  valTals,  formed  to  defcend 
like  cattle  from  one  fet  of  owners  to  another,  who  have  an 
abfolute  dominion  over  them.  It  is  a  wonder,  that  thofe  who 
view  their  fpecies  in  a  light  fo  humiliating,  mould  ever  be  able 
to  think  of  themfeives  without  regret  and  fhame.  The  inten- 
tion of  thefe  obfervations  is  not  to  oppofe  fuch  fentiments  ; 
but  taking  for  granted  the  reafonablenefs  of  Civil  Liberty,  to 
fhew  wherein  it  confifts,  and    what   diftinguifhes   it  from  its 

contrary. And  in  confidering  this  fubjecl,  as  it  has  been 

now  treated,  it  is  unavoidable  to  reflect  on  the  excellency  of 
a  free  government,  and  its   tendency  to  exalt  the  nature  of 

B  2  man. 

*  See  among  others  Mr.   Locke  on  Government,  and  Mr.  Prieftley's  E flay  on 
the  firft  Principles  of  Government. 


(  **  ) 

man. Every  member  of  a  free  {late,  havingfhis, property 

fecure,  and  knowing  himfelf  his  own  governor,  polTeiTes  a 
cqnfc.toufnefs  of  dignity  in  himlelf,  and  feels  incitements  to 
emulation  and  improvement,  to  which  the  miferabie  daves  of 
arbitrary  power  muic  be  utter  ftrangers.  In  fuch  2  (late  all 
the  fprings  of  adion    have  room  to  operate,    and  the  mind  is 

Simulated  to  the  nobleft  exertions.-}- Hut  to  be  obliged, 

from  our  birth,  to  look  up  to  a  creature  no  better  than  our- 
selves as  the  mailer  of  our  fortunes ;  and  to  receive  his  will  as 

our  law What  can   be  more  humiliating  ?   What  elevated 

ideas  can  enter  a  mind   in  fuch   a  fituation  ? Agreeably  to 

this  remark  ,  the  fubjecb  of  free  flates  have,  in  all  ages,  been, 
mod:  diilinguiihed  for  genius  and  knowledge.  Liberty  is  the 
foil  where  the  arts  and  fciences  have  fiourifhed  ;  and  the  more 
free  a  irate  has  been,  the  more  have  the  powers  of  the  human 
mind  been  drawn  forth  into  action,  and  the  greater  number 
of  brave  men  has  it  produced.  With  what  luftre  do  the  an- 
tient  free  ftates  of  Greece  mine  in  the  annals  of  the  world  I 
How  different  is  that  country  now,  under  the  Great  Turk  ? 
The  difference  between  a  country  inhabited  by  men,  and  by 
brutes,  is  not  greater. 

Thefe  are  rerle£iions  which  mould  be  conftantly  prefent  to 
every  mind  in  this  country--— --As  Mcra I  Liberty  is  the  prime 
bleiTing  of  man  in  his  private  capacity,  fo  is  Civil  Liberty  in 
his  public  capacity.  There  is  nothing  that  requires  more  to 
be  watched  than  power.  There  is  nothing  that  ought  to  be 
oppofed  with  a  more  determined  refolution  than  its  encroach- 
ments. Sleep  in  a  (late,  as  Montefquicu  fays,  is  always  fol- 
lowed by  flavery* 

The  people  of  this  kingdom  were  once  warmed  by  fuch 
fentiments  as  thole.  Many  a  fycophant  of  power  have  they 
facrshxed.  Often  have  they  fought  and  bled  in"  the  caufe  of 
Liberty.  But  that  time  feems  to  be  going.  The  fair  inhe- 
ritance of  Liberty  left  us  by  our  anceftors  many  of  us  are  not 
unwilling  to  refign.  1  An  abandoned  venality,  the  infeparable 
companion  of  diffipation  and  extravagance,  has  poifoned  the 
fprings  of  public  virtue  among  us  :  And  fhould  any  events 
ever  arife  that  mould  render  the  oppofition  necefTary  that  took 
place  in  the  times  of  King  Charles  the  Firft,  and  James  the 
Second,  1  am  afraid  all  that  is  valuable  to  us  would  be  loft. 
The  terror  of  the  Handing  army,  the  danger  of  the  public 
funds,  and  the  all-corrupting  influence  of  the  treafury,  would 
deaden  all  zeal,  and  produce  ceneral  acquiefcencc  and  fervility. 

S  E  C  T.     III. 

f  See  Dr.  PriefHey  on  Government,  page  68,  <5p,  &c, 


l3 


SECT.      III.' 

Qf  the  Authority  of  one  Country  over  another, 

FROM  the  nature  and  princiles  of  Civil  Liberty,  as  they 
have  been  now  explained,  it  is  an  immediate  and  neceflary 
inference  that  no  one  community  can  have  any  power  over 
the  property  or  legiflation  of  another  community,  that  is  not 
incorporated  with  it  by  a  juft  and  adequate  rcprefentation. — 
Then  only,  it  has  been  (hewn,  is  a  ftate  freet  when  it  is 
governed  by  its  own  will.  But  a  country  that  is  fubject  to 
the  legiflature  of  another  country,  in  which  it  has  no  voice, 
and  over  which  it  has  no  controul,  cannot  be  faid  to  be 
governed  by  its  own  will.  Such  a  country  therefore,  is  in  a 
Rate  of  flavery.  And  it  deferves  to  be  particularly  confidered, 
that  fuch  a  il  a  very  is  worfc,  on  feveral  accounts,  than  any 
flavery  of  private   men   to   one    another,    or  cf  kingdoms   to 

defpots  within  themfelves.« Between  one  ftate  and  another, 

there  is  none  of  that  fellow-feeling  that  takes  place  between 
perfons  iri  private  life.  Being  detached  bodies  that  never  fee 
one  another,  and  refiding  perhaps  in  different  quarters  of  the 
globe,  the  ftate  that  governs  cannot  be  a  witnefs  to  the 
fufferings  occafioned  by  its  cpprefiions  ;  or  a  competent  judge 
of  the  circumftanccs  and  abilities  of  the  people  who  are  go- 
verned. They  mull:  alfo  have  in  a  great  degree  feparate 
interefts  ;  and  the  more  the  one  is  loaded,  the  more  the  other 
may  be  eafed.  The  infamy  likewife  of  oppreflion,  beine  in  fuch 
circumftances  fhared    among  a   multitude,   is  not   likely  to  be 

much   feit  or  regarded. On  all  the'fe  accounts  there  is,  in 

the  cafe  of  one  country  fubjugated  to  another,  little  or  nothing 
to  check  rapacity  ;  and  the  moft  flagrant  injuftice  and  cruelty 

may  be  praclifed  without  remorfe  or  pit}'.- 1  will  add,   that 

It  is  particularly  -difficult  to  fnake  off  a  tyranny  of  this  kind. 
A  fingle  defpot,  if  a  people  are  unanimous  and  refolute,  may  be 
jfoon  fubdued.  But  a  defpotic  ftate  is  not  eafily  fubdued  ;  and 
a  people  fubjeft  to  it  cannot  emancipate  themfelves  without 
entering  into  a  dreadful,  and,  perhaps,  very  unequal  conteft. 

I  cannot  help  obferving  farther,  that  the  flavery  of  a  people 
to  internal  defpots  may  be  qualified  and  limited  ;  but  I  don't 
fee  what  can  limit  the  authority  of  one  ftate  over  another. 
The  exercife  of  power  in  this  cafe  can  have  no  other  meafure 
than  difcretion  $  and,  therefore,  mull  be  indefinite  and  abfolute. 

Once 


(     H     ) 

Ones  more.  It  fhould  be  confidered  that  the  government 
of  one  country  by  another,  can  only  be  fupported  by  a  military 
force;  and,  without  fuch  a  fupport,  muft  be  deftitute  of  all 
wtighi  and  efficiency, 

This    will     be    bed    explained    by    putting    the  following 

cafe. There  is,  let  us  fuppofe,  in  a  province  fubje&  to  the 

Sovereignty  of  a  diftant  ftate,  a  fubordinate  legislature  confid- 
ing of  an  Aflfembly  chofen  by  the  people  ;  a  Council  chofen 
by"  that  Aflembly  ;  and  a  Governor  appointed  by  the  Sovereign 
State,  and  paid  by  the  Province.  There  are,  likevvife,  judges 
and  other  officers,  appointed  and  paid  in  the  fame  manner, 
for  adminiilering  jijVice  agreeably  to  the  laws,  by  the  verdi&s 

of  juries  fairly  and   indiscriminately  chofen. i  his  forms  a 

conftkutiori  feemingly  free,  by  giving  the  people  a  fbare  in  their 
own  government,  and  feme  check  on  their  rulers.  But,  while 
there ts  a  highet  legiflative  power,  to  the  controul  of  which  fuch 
a  conllitution  is  fubjedt,  it  does  not  itfelf  poffefs  Liberty,  and 
therefore,  cannot  be  of  any  ufe  as  a  fecuriiy  to  Liberty  ;  nor  is 
it  pofnble'  that  it  fhould  be  of  long  duration.  Laws  offentive  to 
the  Province  will  be  enacted  by  the  Sovereign  State.  The  legi- 
slature of  the  province  will  remonstrate  againfl  therh.  The  ma- 
gistrates will  not  execute  them.  Juries  will  not  com/id  upon 
them  ;  and  confequently,  like  the  Pope's  Bulls  which  once  go- 
verned Europe,  they  will  become  nothing  but  forms  and  empty 
founds,  to  which  no  regard  will  be  (hewn. In  order  to  re- 
medy this  evil,  and  to  give  efficiency  to  its  government,  the 
iupreme  irate  will  naturally  be  led  to  withdraw  the  Governor^ 
the  Council,  and  the  Judges*  from  the  controul  o^  the  Province, 

by 
*  The  independency  of  the  Judges  we  efleem  in  this  country  one  of  our  greeted 
nrivileees -—Before  the  revolution  they  generally,  I  believe*,  held  their  places 
yur :n  ;  plcafurt  King  William  gave  them  their  places  during  good  behaviour, 
V  -  the  aceeffion  of  the  prefent  Royal  Family  their  places  were  given  ihem  during 
tiodbehavidur,  in  eprtfequence  of  the  Aft  of  Settlement,  n Jk  13  W.  III.  c.  z. 
Yhit-nophwoa  having  been  entertained  By  fcme.that  though  their  com  in  iffiores 
were  made  under  the  Act  of  Settlement  to  continue,  during  good  behaviour, 
vrt  ihiVthev  determined  on  the  demife  of  the  Crown  ;  it  was  enacled  by  a  fh- 
l^  made  in  the  firft  year  of  bis  prefent  Majefty,  Chap  z3.  -  That  the 
"  Commits  of  judges  for  the  time  being  foal!  be,  continue,  and  remain  m 
«  full  force  during  their  good  behaviour,  notwithstanding  the  demife  or  Ins 
«<  Miettv  or  of  any  of  his  Heirs  and  Succefibrs;"  with  a  provifo,  "  that  it 
«  mav  be lawful  for  his  Majefty,  his  Heirs  and  Succcfiors,  to  remove  any  Judge 
«  unon  the  addrefs  of  both  iWes  of  Parliament."  And  by  the  fame  Statute 
1  i'  Hi  irics  -re  fecured  to  them  during  the  continuance  of  their  commiiTions  : 
ti •  Mn^Jlv  according  to  the  preamble  of  the  Statute,  having  been  pieafed  to 
dicd-ni iron  /the  Throne  to  both  Houfes  of  Parliament,  »  Thar  he  looked  up- 
«  on  the.  Independency  and  uprightnefs  of  Judges,  as  eflential  to  ^""Parti- 
..aladfniniftrationof  JulHc:,  as  one  ot  the  hcit  iecuntics  to  the  Rights  and 
«  Liberties  of  his  loving  Subject,  and  as  molt  conducive  to  the  hmonr  of  his 
"Crown."  Awoit.iy 


(     iS    ) 

by  making  them  entirely  dependant  on  itfelf  for  their  pay  and 
continuance  in  office,  as  well  as  for  their  appointment.  It  will 
alfo  alter  the  mode  of  chufing  Juries  on  purpofe  to  bring  them 
more  under  its  influence  :  And  in  fome  cafes,  under  the  pre- 
tence of  the  impofiibiHty  of  gaining  an  impartial  trial  where 
government  is  rehfted,  it  will  perhaps  ordain,  that  offenders 
ihall  be  removed  from  the  Province  to  be  tried  within  its 
own  territories:  And  it  may  tven  go  fo  far  rn  this  kind  of 
policy,  as  to  endeavour  to  prevent  the  effects  oi"  difcontents, 
by  forbidding  all  meetings  and  alTociations  of  the  people, 
except  at  fuch  times,  and  for  fuch  particular  purposes,  as 
fhall  be  permitted  them. 

Thus  will  fuch  a  Province  be  exactly  in  the  fame  ftate  *hat 
Britain  would  be  in,  were  our  nrtt  executive  Magiflrate,  oir 
Houfe  of  Lords,  and  our  Judges,  nothing  but  the  inftruments* 
of  a  foreign  democraticah  power ;  were  our  Juries  nominated 
by  that  power;  or  were  we  liable  to  be  tranfported  to  a 
diftant  country  to  be  tried  for  oxences  committed  here;  and 
retrained  from  calling  any  meetings,  ccnfulting  about  any 
grievances,  or  ailbciating  for  anv  purpofes,  except  when  leave 
fhould  be  given  us  by  a  Lord  Lieutenant  or  Viceroy. 

It  is  certain  that  this  is  a  ilate  of  oppiefiion  which  no 
country  could  endure,  and  to  which,  it  would  be  vain  to 
expert,  that  any  people  fhould  fubmit  an  hour  without  an 
armed  force  to  compel  them. 

The  late  tran factions  in  Majfachufetts  Bay  are  a  perfect,  ex- 
emplification of  what  I  have  now  faid.  The  government  of 
Great  Britain  in  that  Province  has  gone  on  exactly  in  the  train 
I  have  defcribed ;  till  at  laft  it  became  necellary  to  ftation 
troops  there,  not  amenable  to  the  civil  power  ;  and  all  termi- 
nated in  a  government  by  the  Sv/ord.  And  fuch,  if  a  people 
are  not  funic  below  the  character  of  men,  will  be  the  iilue  of 
all  governments  in  fimilar  circum&ances. 

It  may  be  afked c<  Are  there  not  caufes  by  which  one 

c<  ftate  may  acquire  a  rightful  authority  over  another,  though 

"  not  Gomfclidated  by  an   adequate  Representation  ?" -I 

anfvver  that  there  are  no  fuch  caufes.- All  the  caufes  to 

which  fuch  an  effect  can  be  afcribed  are  Conquest,  Com- 
pact, or  Obligations  conferred. 

Much 


A  worthy  friend  and  able  Lawyer  has  ftipplied  me  with  this  note,  It  affords, 
when  c^ntrafced  with  that  dvpendence  of  the  Judges  which  has  been  thought 
reafonabJe  in  America,  a  fad  fpeeiu.cn  of  the  different  manner  in  which  a  king? 
<&om  may  think  proper  to  govern  iffeif,  and  the  provinces  fubjetf:  tq  it. 


(  Itf  ) 

Much  has  been  faid  of  the  right  of  conqueft  ;  and  biftory 
contains  little  mere  than  accounts  of  kingdoms  reduced  by  it 
under  the  dominion  of  other  kingdom*,  and  of  the  havock  it 
has  made  among  mankind.  But  the  authority  derived  from 
hence,  being  founded  on  violence,  is  never  rightful.  The 
Roman  Republic  was  nothing  but  a  faction  again  It  the  general 
liberties  of  the  world  ;  and  had  no  more  right  to  give  law 
to  the  Provinces  iubject  to  it,  than  thieves  have  to  the  pro- 
perty they  feizf,  or  to  the  houfes  into  which  they   break. 

Even  in  the  cafe  of  a  juif.  war  undertaken  by  one  people 
to  defend  ftfelf  againfl  the  oppreflions  of  another  people, 
conquetf  gives  only  a  right  to  an  indemnification  for  the 
injury  which  occaiioned  the  war,  and  a  rcalbnable  fecurity 
agajrift  future  injury. 

"Neither  can  any  flate  acquire  fuch  an  authority  over  other 
/rates  in  virtue  of  any  compacts  or  ccjjions.  This  is  a  cafe  in 
which  compacts  are  not  binding.  Civil  Liberty  is,  in  this 
refpeel,  on  the  fame  footing  with  Religious  Liberty.  As  no 
people  can  lawfully  furrender  their  Religious  Liberty,  by 
giving  up  their  right  of  judging  for  themfelves  in  religion,  or 
by  allowing  any  human  beings  to  prefcribe  to  them  what 
faith  they  (hall  embrace,  or  what  mode  of  worfhip  they  {hall 
prailife  ;  fo  neither  can  any  civil  focieties  lawfully  furrender 
their  Civil  Liberty,  by  giving  up  to  any  extraneous  jurifdiclion 
their  power  of  legislating  for  themfelves  and  difpofmg  their 
property.  Such  a  ceffion,  being  inconfiitent  with  the  un- 
alienable rights  of  human  nature,  would  either  not  bind  at 
all  ;  or  bind  only  the  individuals  who  made  it.  This  is  a 
blcfling  which  no  one  generation  of  men  can  give  up  for 
another;  and  which,  when  loll,  a  people  have  always  a  right 

to  relume. Had  our  anceftors  in  this  country  been  fo  mad 

as  to  have  fubje&ed  themfelves  to  any  foreign  Community, 
we  could  not  have  been  under  any  obligation  to  continue  in 
fuch  a  ilate.  And  all  the  nations  now  in  the  world  who, 
in  confequence  oi"  the  tarnenefs  and  folly  of  their  predecefibrs, 
are  fubject  to  arbitrary  power,  have  a  right  to  emancipate 
themfelves  as  foon  as  they  can. 

Vi  neither  conquejl  nor  compact  can  give  fuch  an  authority, 
much  lefs  can  any  favours  received,   or  any  Cervices  performed 

by   one   ilate   for   another. Let  the 'favour   received    be 

what  it  will,  Liberty  is  too  dear  a  price  for  it.  A  (rate  that 
has  been  obliged  is  not,  therefore,  bound  to  be  enjlsved.     It 

oueht. 


(     17     ) 

ought,  if  poSfible,  to  make  an  adequate  return  for  the  ferviccs 
done  to  it ;  but  to  fuppofe  that  it  ought  to  give  up  the  power 
of  governing  itfelf,  and  the  difpofal  of  its  property,  would  be 
to  fuppofe,  that,  in  order  to  fhew  its  gratitude,  it  ought  to 
part  with  the  power  of  ever  afterwards  exercifing  gratitude. — 
How  much  has  been  done  by  this  kingdom  for  Hanover? 
But  no  one  will  fay  that  on  this  account,  we  have  a  right  to 
make  the  laws  of  Hanover ;  or  even  to  draw  a  iingle  penny 
from  it  without  its  own  confent. 

After  what  has  been  faid  it  will,  I  am  afraid,  be  trifling  o 
apply  the  preceding  arguments  to  the  cafe  of  different  crm- 
munities,  which  are  considered  as  different  parts  of  the  nme 
Empire.  But  there  are  reafons  which  render  it  neceffary  lor 
me  to  be  explicit  in  making  this  application. 

What  I  mean  here  is  juft  to  point  out  the  difference  of  fitu- 
ation  between  communities  forming  an  Empire,  and  particu- 
lar bodies  or  claffes  of  men  forming  different  parts  of  a  King- 
dom. Different  communities  forming  an  Empire  have  no  con- 
nexions, which  produce  a  neceffary  reciprocation  of  inrerefts 
between  them.  They  inhabit  different  diitricts,  and  are  go- 
verned by  d+fferent  legislatures.-- -On  the  contrary.  The  dif- 
ferent claffes  of  men  within  a  kingdom  are  all  placed  on  the  fame 
ground.  Their  concerns  and  intereSts  are  the  lame  ;  and 
what  is  done  to  one  part  muft  affecl  all —  Thefe  are  Situa- 
tions totally  different;  and  a  constitution  of  government  that 
may  be  confident  with  Liberty  in  one  of  them,  may  be  entire- 
ly inconfiftent  with  it  in  the  other.  It  is,  however,  certain 
that,  even  in  the  laft  of  thefe  fituations,  no  one  part  ought  to 
govern  the  reft.  In  order  to  a  fair  and  equal  government,  there 
ought  to  be  a  fair  and  equal  reprefentation  of  all  that  are 
governed  ;  and  as  far  as  this  is  wanting  in  any  government, 
it  deviates  from  the  principles  of  Liberty,   anJ  becomes  unjuffc 

and  oppreSIive.- But  in  the  circumftances  of  different  c<  m- 

munities,  all  this*  holds  with  unfpeakably  more  force.  The 
government  of  a  part  in  this  cafe  becomes  complete  tyranny  ; 
and  fubjec~tion  to  it  becomes  complete  Slavery. - 

But  ought  there  not,  it  is  afked,  to  exift  fomewhere  in  art 
Empire  a  fupreme  legislative  authority  over  the  whole  ;  or  a 
power  to  controul   and  bind  all  the  different  States  of  which 

it  confifts. This  enquiry  has  been  already  anfwered.     The 

truth  is,  that  fuch  a  fupreme  commuting  power  ought  to  exiSfc 
no-where  except  in  fuch  a  Senate  or  body  of  delegates  as 
that  defcribed  in  page  7  ->  and  that  the  authority  or  fupremacy 

C  of 


(     i3     ) 

of  even  this  Senate  ought  to  be  limited  to  the  common  concerns 

of  the  Empire. 1  think  I  have  proved  that  the  fundamental 

principles  of  Liberty,  neceiTarily  require  this. 

In  a  word.  An  Empire  is  a  collection  of  ftates  or  commu- 
nities united  by  fome  common  bond  or  tye.  If  thefe  ftates 
have  each  of  them  free  conftitutions  of  government,  and,  with 
refpect  to  taxation  and  internal  legifiation,  are  independent  of 
the  other  ftates,  but  united  by  compacts  or  alliances,  or  fub- 
je£bon  to  a  Great  Council,  representing  the  whole,  or  to  one 
monarch  entrufted  with  the  fuprcme  executive  power :  In 
thefe  circumftances,  the  Empire  will  be  an  Empire  of  Freemen. 

If,  on  the  contrary,  like  the  different  provinces  iubje£f.  to 

the  Grand  Seignior,  none  of  the  ftates  poffefs  any  independent 
legiflative  authority  3  but  are  all  fubjeel:  to  an  abfolute  mo- 
narch, whofe  will  is  their  law  ;  then  is  the  Empire  an  Empire 

of  Slaves. If  one  of  the  ftates  is  free,  but  governs  by  its 

will  all  the  other  ftates  ;  then  is  the  Empire,  like  that  of  the 
Romans  in  the  times  of  the  republic,  an  Empire  confifting  of 
One  ftate  free,  and  the  reft  in  flavery  :  Nor  does  it  make  any 
more  difference  in  this  cafe,  that  the  governing  ftate  is  itfelf 
free,  than  it  does  in  the  cafe  of  a  kingdom  fubjecl:  to  a  defpet, 
that  this  defpot  is  himfelf  free.  I  have  before  obferved,  that 
this  only  makes  the  fiavery  worfe.  There  is,  in  the  one  cafe, 
a  chance,  that  in  the  quick  fucceftion  of  defpots,  a  good  one 
will  fometimes  arife.  But  bodies  of  men  continue  the  fame  ; 
and  have  generally  proved  the  moft  unrelenting  of  all  tyrants. 
A  great  writer  before  *  quoted,  obferves  of  the  Ro?nan 
Empire,  that  while  Liberty  was  at  the  center,  tyranny  pre- 
vailed in  the  diftant  provinces  ;  that  fuch  as  were  free  under 
it  were  extremely  fo,  while  thofe  who  were  flaves  groaned 
under  the  extremity  of  flavery;  and  that  the  fame  events  that 
dejl royed  the  liberty  of  the  former,  gave  liberty  to  the  latter. 

The  liberty  of  the  Romans,  therefore,  was  only  an  additional 
calamity  to  the  provinces  governed  by  them  ;  and  though  it 
might  have  been  faid  of  the  citizens  of  Rc?ne,  that  they  were 
the  "  freeft  members  of  any  civil  fociety  in  the  known  world  ;*' 
yet  of  the  Cubjcfis  of  Rome,  it  mud  have  been  faid,  that  they  were 

the  completed  flaves  in  the  known  world. How  remarkable 

is  it,  that  this  very  people,  once  the  freeft  of  mankind,  but  at 
the  fame  time  the  moft  proud  and  tyrannical,  Should  become  at 
laft  the  moft  contemptible  and  abject  flaves  that  ever  exifted  ? 

PART 

*  Monteftjuieu's  Spirit  of  J-aws,  Vol;  I5  Book  11,  C.  xik. 


(     *9    ) 
PART         II. 

IN  the  foregoing  difquifitions,  I  have,  from  one  leading  prin- 
ciple, deduced  a  number  of  confequences,  that  feerri  to  me 
incapable  of  being  difputed.  I  have  meant  that  they  mould 
be  applied  to  the  great  queftion  between  this  kingdom  and  the 
Colonies  which  has  occalioned  the  prefent  war  with  them. 

It  is  impofiible,  but  my  readers  muft  have  been  all  along 
making  this  application  ;  and  if  they  ftill  think,  that  the  claims 
©f  this  kingdom  are  reconcileable  to  the  principles  of  true  liberty 
and  legitimate  government,  I  am  afraid,  that  nothing  I  fhall 
farther^  fay  will  have  any  effect  GO  their  judgments.  I  wifh, 
however,  they  would  have  the  patience  and  candour  to  go  with 
me,  and  grant  me  a  hearing  fome  time  longer. 

Though  clearly  decided  in  my  own  judgment  on  this  fubjecr, 
I  am  inclined  to  make  great  allowances  for  the  different  judg- 
ments of  others.  We  have  been  fo  ufed  to  fpeak  of  the  Colo- 
nies as  our  Colonies,  and  to  think  of  them  as  in  a  ftate  of  fub- 
ordination  to  us,  and  as  holding  their  exiftence  in  America  only 
for  our  ufe,  that  it  is  no  wonder  the  prejudices  of  many  are 
alarmed,  when  they  find  a  different  doclrine  maintained.  The 
meaneft  perfon  amongft  us  is  difpofed  to  look  upon  himfrlf  as 
having  a  body  of  fubjecis  in  America  ;  and  to  be  offended  at  the 
denial  of  his  right  to  make  laws  for  them,  though  perhaps  he 
does  not  know  what  colour  they  are  of,  or  what  language  they 
talk.— Such  are  the  natural  prejudices  of  this  country.- 
But  the  time  is  coming,  I  hope,  when  the  unreafonablenefs  of 
them  will  be  feen  ;  and  more  juft  fentiments  prevail. 

Before  i  proceed,  I  beg  it  may  be  attended  to,  that  I  have 
chofen  to  try  this  queftion  by  the  general  principles  of  Civil 
Liberty  ;  and  not  by  the  practice  of  former  times  j  or  by  the 

Charters  granted  the  colonies. The  arguments/or  them, 

drawn  from  thefe  lafl  topics,  appear  to  me  greatly  to  outweigh, 
the  arguments  again/}  them.  But  I  wifh  to  have  this  queftiori 
brought  to  a  higher  teft,  and  furer  iffue.  The  queftion  with  all 
liberal  enquirers  ought  to  be,  not  what  jurisdiction  over  them 
Precedents,  Statutes,   and   Charters  give,   but   what  reafon  and 

equity,  and  the  rights  of  humanity  give. This  is,  in  truth, 

a  queition  which  no  kingdom  has  ever  before  had  occafion  to 
agitate.     The  cafe  of  a  free  country  branching  itfelf  out  in  the 

G  2  manner 


(    2°   ) 

manner  Britain  has  done,  and  fending  to  a  diftant  world  colo- 
nies which  have  there,  from  fmall  beginnings,  and  under  free 
legiflatures  of  their  own,  increafed,  and  formed  a  body  of  pow- 
erful irates,  likely  foon  to  become  fuperior  to  the  parent  ftate. 
—-This  is  a  cafe  which  is  new  in  the  hiftory  of  mankind  ;  and 
it  is  extremely  improper  to  judge  of  it  by  the  rules  of  any  nar- 
row and   partial  policy  ;  or  to  confider  it  on  any  other  ground 

than  the  general  one  of  reafon   and  juftice. Thofe  who 

will  be  candid  enough  to  judge  on  this  ground,  and  who  can 
diveft  tfiemfelves  of  national  prejudice?,  will  not,  I  fancy,  re- 
main long  unfatisfied. But  alas  !   Matters  are  gone  too  for. 

The  difpute  probably  mult  be  fettled  another  way  ;  and  the 
fword  alone,  I  am  afraid,  is  now  to  determine  what  the  rights 

of  Biitain  and  America  are. Shocking  fituation  !---Detefted 

be  the  meafures  which  have  brought  us  into  it:  And,  if  we 
are  endeavouring  to   enforce  injuftice,  curled  will  be  the  war. 

A  retreat,  however,   k  not  yet  impracticable.     The  duty 

we  owe  our  gracious  fovereign  obliges  us  to  rely  on  his  dif- 
p  fitibn  to  ftay  the  fword,  and  to  promote  the  happinefs  of  all 
the  different  parts  of  the  Empire  at  the  head  of  which  he  is 
placed.  With  fome  hopes,  therefore,  that  it  may  not  be  too 
late  to  reafon  on  this  fubjecl,  I  will,  in  the  following  Sections, 
enquire  what  the  war  with  America  is  in  the  following  refpecls. 

1.  In  refpect  of  Juftice. 

2.  The  Principles  of  the  Conftitution. 

3.  In  refped  of  Policy  and  Humanity. 

4.  The  Honour  of  the  kingdom. 

And  laftly,  The  Probability  of  fucceeding  in  It. 


SECTION       I. 

Of  the  Jujlice  of  the  War  with  America. 

THE  enquiry,  whether  the  war  with  the  Colonies  is  zjuji 
war,  will  be  beft  determined  by  dating  the  power  over 
them,  which  it  is  the  end  of  the  war  to  maintain  :  And  this 
cannot  be  better  done,  than  in  the  words  of  an  ac~t  of  parlia- 
ment, made  on  purpofe  to  define  it.  That  adt,  it  is  well 
known,  declares,  "  That  this  kingdom  has  power,  and  of 
"  riffht  ought  to  have  power  to  make  laws  and  (ratutes  to  bind 
««  the  Colonies,  and  people  of  America^  in  all  cafes  •  whatever/' 

—  Dreadful 


(  21  ) 

-—Dreadful  power  indeed  !  I  defy  anyone  to  exprefs  flavery  in 
ftronger  language.     It  is  the  fame  as  declaring  "  that  we  have 

"  a  right  to  do  with  them  what  we  pleafe." 1  will  not  vvatfe 

my  time  by  applying  to  filch  a  claim  any  of  the  preceding  ar- 
guments. If  my  reader  does  not  feel  more  in  this  cafe,  than, 
words  can  exprefs,  all  reifoning  muft  be  vain. 

But,  probably,  mod  perfons  will  be  for  uilng  milder  lan- 
guage;  and  for  faying  no  more  than,  that  the  united  legisla- 
tures of  England  and  Scotland  have  of  right  power  to  tax  the 

Colonies,  and  a  fupremacy  of  legislation  over  America. 

But  this  comes  to  the  fame.  If  it  means  any  thing,  it  means, 
that  the  property,  and  the  legislations  of  the  Colonies,  are  fub- 
jecl:  to  the  abfolute  discretion  of  Great  Britain^  and  ought  of 
right  to  be  fo.  The  nature  of  the  thing  admits  of  no  limita- 
tion. The  Colonies  can  never  be  admitted  to  be  judges, 
how   far  the  authority  over  them  in  thefe  cafes   Shall  extend. 

This  would  be  to  deftroy  it  entirely. If  any  part  of  their 

property  is  fubjec~t  to  our  difcretion,  the  whole  muft  be  fo.  If 
we  have  a  right  to  interfere  at  all  in  their  internal  legislations, 

we  have  a  right  to  interfere  as  far  as  we  thinlc  proper. It 

is    felf-evident,  that   this  leaves   them   nothing   they   can  call 

their  cvjn. And  what  is  it  that  can  give  to  any  people  fuch 

a  fupremacy  over  another  people  ? 1  have  already  exami- 
ned the  principal  anfwers  which  have  been  given  to  this 
enquiry.  But  it  will  not  be  amifs  in  this  place  to  go  over 
fome  of  them  again. 

It  has  been  urged,  that  fuch  a  right  mull:  be  lodged  fome- 
where,  "  in  order  to  pieferve  the  Unity  of  the  Britiih 
Empire." 

Pleas  of  this  fort  have,  in   all  ages,  been   ufed   to  juftify 

tyranny. 7'hey   have  in  Religion  given  rife  to  num- 

berlefs  oppreffive  claims,  and  flaviSh  Hierarchies.  And  in  the 
Romi/h  Cotnmunion  particularly,  it  is  well  known,  that  the 
Pope  claims  the  title  and  powers  of  the  fupreme  head  on 
earth  of  the  Christian  church,  in  order  to  preferve  its  Unity. 

With  refpeft  to  the  Britifi)  E?npire^  nothing  can  be  more 

prepofterous  than  to  endeavour  to  maintain  its  unity,  by 
Setting  up  fuch  a  method  of  eftablifhing  unity,  which,  like  the 
fimilar  method  in  religion,  can  produce  nothing  but  mifchief. 

The  truth  is,  that  a  common   relation   to   one  fupreme 

executive  head  ;  an  exchange  of  kind  offices  ;  tyes  of  intereft 
and  affection,  and  compact^  are  fufficient  to  give  the  Britifh 

Empire 


(  **  ) 

Empire  all  the  unity   th»2t  is  neceflary.     But  if  not — If, 

inj  order  to  pieferve  its  Unity,  one  half  of  it  muft  be  en- 
flaved  to  the  other  half,  let  it,  in  the  name  of  God,  want 
Unity. 

Much  has  been  faid  of  "  the  Superiority  of  the  Britifh  State." 
But  what  gives  us  our  fuperion'ty  ?---Is  it  ourlFeallh  ?— This 
never  corners   real   dignity.     On    the  contrary  :   Its  effect  is 

always  to  debafe,  intoxicate,  and  corrupt. Is  it  the  ?iumbers 

of  our  people?  The  colonies  will  foon  be  equal  to  us  in  num- 
ber.  h  it  our  Knoivl edge -And  Virtu??  They  are  probably 

equally  knowing,  and  more  virtuous.  There  are  names  among 
them  that  will  not  ftoop  to  any  names  among  the  philosophers 
and  politicians  of  this  ifland. 

44  But  we  are  the  Parent  State." — Thefe  are  tjie  magic 

words  which   have  fafcinated  and  mifleu  us. The  Englifh 

came  from  Germany.  Does  that  give  the  German  ftates  a 
right  to  tax  us  ? — Children,  having  no  property,  and  being 
incapable  of  guiding  thcmfelvcs,  the  author  of  nature  has 
committed  the  care  of  them  to  their  parents,  and  fubjected 
•  them  to  their  abfolute  authority.  But  there  is  a  period  when, 
having  acquired  property,  and  a  capacity  of  judging  for  them- 
felvef*  they  become  independent  agents;  and  when,  for  this 
region,  the  authority  of  their  parents  ceafes,  and  becomes 
nothing  but  the  refpeel  and  influence  due  to  benefactors.  Sup- 
pofing,  therefore,  that  the  order  of  nature  in  eftabiiiliing  the 
relation  between  parents  and  children,  ought  to  have  been  the 
rule  of  our  conduct  to  the  Colonies,  we  fhould  have  been  gra- 
dually relaxing  our  authority  as  they  grew  up.  But  like  mad 
parents,  we  have  done  the  contrary  ;  and,  at  the  very  time 
when  our  authority  fhould  have  been  moft  relaxed,  we  have 
carried  it  to  the  greateft  extent,  and  exercifed  it  with  the 
greater!  rigour.  No  wonder  then,  that  they  have  turned  upon 
us  ;  and  obliged  us  to  remember  that  they  are  not  children. 

il  But  we  have,  it  is  faid,  protected  them,  and  run  deeply  in 
"  debt  on  their  account. "—-The  full  anfwer  to  this  has  been 
already  given,  (p.  16,  17.)  Will  any  one  fay,  that  all  we  have 
dene  for  them  has  net  been  more  on  our  vwn  account*,  than  on 

theirs  ? 

f  This  is  particularly  true  of  the  bounties  granted  on  tame  American  commodities 
(as  pitch,  tar,  indigo,  &C.f)  when  imported  into  Britain  ;  for  it  is  well  known, 
that  the  end  of  granting  them  was,  to  get  thofc  commodities  cheaper  from  the 
Colonics  and  in  rfctHrn  For  cur  manufactures,  which  we  ufed  to  get  from  Rujfitt 
•:id  other  f  >rci  And  this  is  e>:pre(lcd  in  the  -preamble  of  the  laws 

which 


(  23  ) 

j/Wrj?— But  fuppofe  the  contrary.  Have  they  done  nothing 
for  us  ?  Have  they  made  no  compenfations  for  the  protection 
they  have  received  ?  Have  they  not  helped  us  to  pay  our  taxes, 
to  fupport  our  poor,  and  to  bear  the  burthen  of  our  debts,  by 
taking  from  us,  au  our  own  price,  all  the  commodities  with 
which  we  can  fupply  them  ? — Have  they  not,  for  our  advan- 
tage, fubmitted  to  many  restraints  in  acquiring  property  ?  Muft 
they  likewife  refign  to  us  the  diipofal  of  that  property  ? 
Has  not  their  exclufive  trade  with  us  been  for  many  years  one 

of  the  chief  fources  of  our  national  wealth  and  power  ?— > 

In  all  our  wars  have  they  not  fought  by  our  fide,  and  contri- 
buted much  to  our  fuccefs  ?  In  the  laft  war,  particularly,  it  is 
well  known,  that  they  ran  themfelves  deeply  in  debt ;  and  that 
the  paTiament  thought  it  neceffary  to  grant  them  ^onfiderable 
fums  annually  as  compenfations  for  going  beyond  h_ir  abilities 
in  aflifting  us.     And  in  this  courfe  would  they  have  continued 

for  many  future  years ;  perhaps,  for  ever. In  fhort,  were 

an  accurate  account  Hated,  it  is  by  no  means  certain  which 
fide  would  appear  to  be  mofr  indebted.  When  allied  asfree- 
men,  they  have  hitherto  feldom  difcovered  anv  reluctance  in 
giving.  But,  in  obedience  to  a  demand,  and  with  the  bayonet 
at  thier  breaih,  they  will  give  us  nothing  but  blood. 

It  is  farther  faid*   "  that  the  land  on  which  thev  fettled  was 

"  ours." — : But  how  came  it  to  be  ours  ?   If  failing  alon&j  a 

coaft  can  give  a  right  to  a  country,  then  might  the  people  of 
'Japan  become,  as  foon  as  they  pleafe,  the  proprietors  of  Britain. 
Nothing  can  be  more  chimerical  than  property  founded  on 
fuch  a  reafon.  If  the  land  on  which  the  Colonies  firft  fettled 
had  any  proprietors,  they  we;e  the  natives.  The  greateft  part 
of  it  they  bought  of  the  natives.  They  have  iince  cleared 
and  cultivated  it ;  and,  without  any  help  from  us,  converted 
a  wildernefs  into  fruitful  end  pleafant  fields.  It  is,  therefore, 
now  on  a  double  account  t'fcir  property  ;  and  no  power  on 
earth  cart  have  any  right  to  d'.fturb  them  in  the  pofTefiion  of  it, 
or  to  take  from  them,  without  their  confent,  any  part  of  its 
produce. 

i    But 

which  grant  thefe  bounties.  See  the  Appeal  to  the  JufKce,  Sec.  page  ai  third 
edition  It  is,  therefore,  ftrange  that  Docler  Tucker  and  others,  'fhou'd 
have  infifted  fo  much  upon  thefe  bounties  as  favours  and  indulgences  to  the  Co- 
lonies.  But  it  is  ftill  more  ftrange,  that  the  fame  repiefentation  fhculd  have 

been  made  of  the  compenfations  granted  them  for  doing  more  during  the  lafc 
war  in  aflifting  us  than  could  have  been  reafenably  expecled  ;  and  alio  of  the 
fums  we  have   fpent  in  maintaining  troops  among  them  -without  their  confer.t  j 

and  in  oppofition  to  their  vvifhes. See  a  Pamphter.  entitled  "  The  rights  of 

Great  Britain  ailerted  again  ft  the  claims  of  America," 


(     H    ) 

But  let  it  be  granted,  that,  the  land  was  ours.  Did  they 
not  fettle  upon  it  under  the  faith  of  charters,  which  promifed 
them  the  eiijoyment  of  all  the  rights  of  Englijhmen  ;  and  allowed 
them  to  tax  themfelves,  and  to  be  governed  by  legislatures  of 
their  own,  iimilar  to  ours  ?  Thefe  charter  were  given  them 
by  an  authoricy,  which  at  the  time  was  thought  competent; 
and  they  have  been  rendered  facrcd  by  an  acquiescence  on  our 
part  for  more  than  a  century.  Can  it  be  wondered  at,  that 
the  Colonies  fhould  revolt,  when  they  found  their  charters 
violated  ;    and  an  attempt  made   to   force  innovations   upon 

them  by   famine  and  the   fword  ?■ But  I  lay   no  ftrefs  on 

charters.  They  derive  their  rights  from  a  higher  fource. 
It  is  inconfiftent  with  common  fenfe  to  imagine,  that  any 
people  would  ever  think  of  fettling  in  a  diftant  country,  on 
any  fuch  condition,  as  that  the  people  from  whom  they  with- 
drew, fhould  for  ever  be  makers  of  their  property,  and  have 
power  to  fubji&  them  to  any  modes  of  government  they  pleafed. 
And  had  there  been  exprefs  itipulations  to  this  purpofe  in  all, 
the  charters  of  the  colonies,  they  would,  in  my  opinion,  be  no 
more  bound  by  them,  than  if  it  had  been  Stipulated  with  them, 
that  they  fhould  go  naked,  or  expofe  themfelves  to  the  incur- 
tions  of  wolves  and  tigers. 

The  'defective  (late  of  the  reprefentation  of  this  kingdom 
has  been  farther  pleaded  to  prove  our  right  to  tax  America. 
We  fubmit  to  a  parliament   that  does  not  reprefent  us,  and 

therefoie  they  ought. How   ftrange  an  argument  is  this? 

It  is  faying  we  want  liberty;  and  therefore,  they  ought  to 
want  it.— ---Suppofe  it  true,  that  they  are  indeed  contending 
for  a   better  conftitution   of  government,    and    more    liberty 

than  we  enjoy.     Ought  this  to  make  us  angry  ? Who  is 

there  that  does  not  fee  the  danger  to  which  this  country  is 
expofed  ? Is  it  generous,  becaufe  we  are  in  a  fink,  to  en- 
deavour to  draw  them  into  it?  Ought  we  not  rather  to  wifli 
earnestly,  that  there  may  at  leait  be  one  free  country 
left  upon  earth,  to  which  we  may  fly,  when  venality,  luxury, 
and  vice  have  compleated  the  ruin  of  liberty  here  ? 

It  is,  however,  by  no  means  true,  that  America  has  no  more 
right  to  be  exempted  from  taxation  by  the  Britijh  parliament, 

than  Britain  itfelf. Here,  all  freeholders,   and  burgefles  in 

borough0,  are  reprcfented.  There,  not  one  Freeholder,  or  any- 
other   perfon,   is  reprelented. Here,  the  aids  granted   by 

the  reprefented  part  of  the  kingdom  muft  be  proportionably 

paid 


C    H    ) 

paid  by  therafelves;  and  the  laws  they  make  for  others,  they  a^ 
the  fame  time  make  for'  themfches.  There,  the  aids  they  would 
grant  would  not  be  paid,  but  received,  by  themfelves  ;  and  the 
Jaws  ihey  made  would  be  made  for  others  only.'  ■  In  (hort. 
The  relation  of  one  country  to  another  country,  whofe  repre- 
fentatives  have  the  power  of  taxing  it  (and  of  appropriating 
the  money  raifed  by  the  taxes)  is  much  the  fame  v/ith  the 
relation  of  a  country  to  a  Tingle  defpot,  or  a  body  of  defpots, 
within  itfelf,  invefted  v/ith  the  like  power,  in  both  cafes,  the 
people  taxed  and  thofe  who,  tax  have  feparate  interefts ;  nor 
can  there  be  any  thing  to  check  oppreflion,.  befides  either  the 
abilities  of  the  people  taxed,  or  the  humanity  of  the  taxers.—* 
But  indeed  I  can  never  hope  to  convince  that  perfon  of  any 
thing,  who  does  not  fee  an  effential  difference  *  between  the 
two  cafes,  now  mentioned  ;  or  between  the  circumftances  of 
individuals,  and  clafles  of  men  ;  making  parts  of  a  community 
imperfectly  reprefented  in  the  legiflature  that  reprefents  it ; 
and  the  circumftances  of  a  whole  community,  in  a  diftant 
world,  not  at  all  reprefented.  * 

But  enough  has  been  faid  by  others  on  this  point ;  nor  is 
it  poflible  for  me  to  throw  any  new  light  upon  it.  To  finifli, 
therefore,  what  I  meant  to  offer  under  this  head,  I  muft  beg 
that  the  following  confiderations  may  be  particularly  attended  to. 
j  The  queftion  now  between  us  and  the  Colonies  is,  Whe«* 
ther  in  refpect  of  taxation  and  internal  legiflation,  they  arc 
bound  to  be  fubjeft  to  the  jurifdiclion  of  this  kingdom  :  Or, 
in  other  words,  Whether  the  Britijh  Parliament  has  or  has  not 
af  right,  a 'power  to  difpofe  of  their  property,  and  to  model 
as  it  pleafes,  their  governments  ? — To  this  fupremacy  over 
then.,  we  fay,  we  are  entitled  ;  and  in  order  to  maintain  it, 
we  have  begun  the  prefent  war. — Let  me  here  enquire, 

jft.  Whether,  if  we  have  now  this  fupremacy,  we  fhall 
not  be  equally  entitled  to  it  in  any  future  time?— They  are 
now  but  little  fhort  of  half  our  number..  To  this  number 
they  have  grown,  from  a  fmall  body  of  original  fettlers,  by 

P  a  very 

*  It  gives  me  pteafure  to  find,  that  the  author  of  the  Remarks  on  the 
principal  A3s  of  the  13 /A  Parliament  of  Great -Britain  >  &c.  acknowledge* 
this  difference.——  It  has,  however,  been  at  the  fame  time  mortifying 
to  me  to  find  fo  abls  a  writer  adopting  fuch  principles  of  government, 
as  are  contained  in  this  work.  According  to  him,  a  people  have  n» 
property  or  rights,  except  fuch  as  their  civil  governors  are  pleafed  not 
to  take  from  them.  Taxes,  therefore,  he  alferts,  are  in  no  fenfe  the 
lifts,  much  left  the  free  gifts  pf  the  people.  See  p.  58  &  191, 


a  very  rapid  increafe.  The  probability  is,  that  they  will  go  on 
toencreafej  and  that,  in  50  or  60  years,  they  will  be  double 
our  number ;  *  and  form  a  mighty  empire,  confifting  of  a  va- 
riety of  ftaies,  all  equal  or  fuperior  to  ourfelves  in  all  the  arts 
and  accomplifhments  which  give  dignity  and  happinefs  to  hu- 
man life.  In  that  period,  wi!l  they  be  ftill  bound  to  acknow- 
ledge that  fupremacy  o/er  them  which  we  now  claim  ?  Can 
there  be  any  perfon  who  will  afiert  this ;  or  whofe  mind  does 
not  revolt  at  the  idea  of  a  vaft  Continent,  holding  all  that  is 
valuable  to  it,  at  the  difcretion  of  a  handful  of  people  on  the 
other  fide  the  Atlantic? — But  if,  at  that  period,  this  wouli 
be  unreafonable,  what  makes  it  otherwise  nowt-*- Draw  the 
line,  if  you  can.-— But  there  is  ftill  a  greater  difficulty. 

Britain  is  now,  1  will  fuppofc,  the  feat  of  liberty  and  virtue, 
«nd  its  legiflature  confifts  of  a  body  of  able  and  independent 
jnen,  who  govern  with  wifdom  and  juftice.  The  time  may 
come  when  all  will  be  reverted:  When  its  excellent  conflitu- 
tion  of  government  will  befubverted  :  When,  prefledby  debts 
and  taxes,  it  will  be  greedy  to  draw  to  itfelf  an  increafe  of 
revenue  from  every  diftant  province,  in  order  to  eafe  its  own 
burthens  :  When  the  influence  of  the  Crown,  ftrerigthened 
by  luxury  and  an  univerfal  profligacy  of  manners,  will  have 
tainted  every  heart,  broken  down  every  fence  of  liberty,  and 
rendered  us  a  nation  of  tame  and  contented  vafFals  :  When  a 
general  EUftien  will  be  nothing  but  a  general  Auclion  of  Bo- 
roughs :  And  when  the  Parliament,  the  Grand  Council  of 
the  nation,  and  once  the  faithful  guardian  of  the  ftate,  and  a 
terror  to  evil  minifters,  will  be  degenerated  into  a  body  of  Sy- 
cophantSy  dependent  and  venal,  always  ready  to  confirm  any 
meafures ;  and  little  more  than  a  public  couVt  for  regiftering 
royal  edicts,— —Such,  it  is  po'flible,  may,  fome  time  or  other, 

be  the  ftate  of    Great-Briism. *What  will,  at  that  period* 

be  the  duty  of  the  Colonies  ?  Will  they  be  frill  bound  to  un- 
conditional fubmiflion  \  Mull  they  always  Continue  an  appen- 
dage to  our  government,  and  follow  it  implicitly  through  every 
change  that  can  happen  to  it  ?— Wretched  condition,  indeed, 

of  millions  of  freemen  as   good  as  ourfelves. Will  you 

fay  that  we  now  govern  equitably ;  and  that  there  is  no  dan- 
ger of  any  fuch   revolution  ? 'Would   to  God  this  were 

Wnc,_-But  will  you  not  always  fay   the  fame  f  Who  fhall 

judge 
*  S»e  ©bftrvatioAs on  Revcirfi«iary  Payments,^.  »o7»  &c« 


(    »7    ) 

judge  whether  we  govern  equitably  or  not  ?— rr-Can  you  give 
the  Colonies  any  fecurity  that  fuch  a  period  will  never  come  ? 
Once  more, 

If  we  have  indeed  that  power  which  we  claim  over  the  le- 
giflations,  and  internal  rights  of  the  Colonies,  may  we  not, 
whenever  we  pleafe,  fubjecl  them  to  the  arbitrary  power  of 
the  Crown  ?- — ^1  do  not  mean  that  this  would  be  a  difad- 
vantageous  change:  For  I  have  before  obferved,  that  if  a 
people  are  to  be  fubjecl  to  an  external  power  over  which  they 
have  no  command,  it  is  better  that  power  /hould  be  lodged  in 
$he  hands  of  one  man  than  of  a  multitude.  But  many  pcrfons 
think  otherwife;  and  Aich  ought  to  confider  that,  if  this 
would  be  a  calamity,  the  condition  of  the  Colonies  muft  be 
deplorable — "  A  government  by  Kiag,  Lords,  and  Commons, 
(it  has  been  faid)  is  the  perfection  of  government ;"  and  fo  ic 
is,  when  the  Commons  are  a  juft  reprefentation  of  the  people; 
and  when  alfo,  it  is  not  extended  to  any  diftant  people,  or 
communities,  not  reprefented.  But  if  this  is  the  bift9  a  go- 
vernment by  a  King  only  rauft  be  the  tver/r;  and  every  claim 
implying  a  right  to  eftablifli  fuch  a  government  among  any 
people  muft  be  unjuft  and  cruel."  It  is  felf-evident,  that 
by  claiming  a  right  to  alter  the  conftitutions  of  the  Colonies, 
according  to  our  difcretion,  we  cjaim  this  power:  And  it  is  a 
power  that  we  have  thought  fit  to  exercife  in  one  of  our  Colo- 
nies; and   that  we  have  attempted  to  exercife  in  another. 

Canada,  according  to  the  late  extention  of  its  limits,  is  a 
country  alraoft  as  large  as  half  Europe,  and  ic  may  poflibly 
come  in  time  to  be  filled  with  Britifh  fubjecls.  The  Quebec 
ad  makes  the  King  of  Great- Britain  a  defpot  over  all  that  coun- 
ty.  In  the  province  of  Majfacbufetts-Bay  the  fame  thing 

has  been  attempted  and  begun.   ' 

The  a#  for  better  regulating  their  government  patted  at  the 
fame  time  with  the  Quebec  a£t,  gives  the  King  the  right  of 
appointing,  and  removing  at  his  pleafure,  the  members  of  one 
part  of  the  legislature;  alters  the  mode  of  chufing  juries,  on 
purpofe  to  bring  it  more  under  the  influence  of  the  King  ;  and 
takes  away  from  the  province  the  power  of  calling  any  meet- 
ings of  the  people   without  the   King's  confent.  *  The 

Judges,  likewife,  have  been  made  dependent  on  the  King  for 

their  nomination  and  pay,  and  continuance  in   office.- If 

all  this  is  no  more  than  we  have  a  right  to  do  j  may  we  not  go  on 

D  2  t# 

t  See  page  15, 


(  *«  ) 

to  aboMfb  the  Houfc  of  Representative?,  to  >lfiuo'j  all  trials 
by  Juries,  and  to  give  up  the  province  abfolutely  and  totally  to 

the  will  of  the  King  ? May  we  not  even  eftablifh  Popery  Lh 

the  province,  as  has  been  lately  dene  in  Canada,  leaving  the 
fupport  of  Protefiantifm  to  the  King's  difcretion  r — Can  there 
be  any  Englishman  who,  were  it  his  own  cafe,  would  not 
fooner  loofe  his  heart's  blood  than  yield  to  claims  fo  pregnant 
with  evils,  and  deftrucYtve  to  every  thing  that  can  diftinguifh 
a  Freeman  from  a  Slave  ? 

I  will  take  this  opportunity  to  add,  that  what  I  have  now 
faid  fuggefts  a  consideration  that  demonftrates,  on  how  dif- 
ferent a  footing  the  Colonies  are  with  refpe£t  to  our  govern- 
ment, from  particular  bodies  of  men  tvithin  the  kingdom,  who 
happen  not  to  be  reprefented.  Here,  it  is  impofiible  that  the 
represented  part  fhould  fubje£fc  the  unreprefented  part  to  ar- 
bitrary power,  without  including  thernfelves.  But  in  the  Co- 
lonies it  is  not  impoflible.     We  know  that  it  has  been  done. 


S      EC      T.       II. 

Whether  the  JVar  w&i  America  is  jujlified  by  ike 
Principles  of  the'ConJlitiitibn. 

\  HAVE  propofed  in  the  next  place,  to  examine  the  war 
J^  with  the  Colonies  by  the  principles  of  the  Conftitution. — 
I  know,  that  it  is  common  to  fay  that  we  are  now  maintaining 
the  Conftitution  in  America.  If  this  means  that  we  are  endea- 
vouring to  eftablifli  our  own  Conftitution  of  government  there, 
it  is  by  no  means  true  ;  ncr,  were  it  true,  would  it  be  right. 
They  have  chartered  governments  of  their  own  with  which 
they  are  pleafed  ;  and  which,  if  any  power  on  earth  may  change 
without   their    confent,  that  power  may  likewife,  if  it  thinks 

proper,  deliver  them  over  to   the   Grand  Seignior. Suppofe 

the  Colonies  of  France  and  Spain  had,  by  compacts,  enjoyed 
for  near  'a  century  and  a  half,  free  governments  open  to  all 
the  world,  and  under  which  they  had  grown  and  flourished  ; 
•what  fhould  we  think  of  thofe  kingdoms,  were  they  to  at- 
tempt to  deftroy  their  governments,  and  to  force  upon  them 
their  own  mode  of  government  ?  Should  we  not  applaud  any 

zeal 


(     29 


zeal  they  discovered  in  repelling  fuch  an  injury  ?- Rut  the 

truth  \s,  in  the  prefent  inftafice,  that  we  are  not  maintaining 
}r>ut  violating  our  own  Ccnfiitution  in  America.  The  cfience 
of  our  Conititution  confins  in  its  independency.  There  is  in 
this  cafe  no  difference  between  fubietlion  aad  Gnv.ihilaihn . — 
Did,  therefore,  the.  Colonies  pofTefs  governments  perfectly 
the  fame  with  ours,  the  attempt  to  fubje£fc  them  to  ours  would 
be  an  attempt  to  ruin  them.  A  free  government  loofes  its  na- 
ture from  the  moment  it  becomes  liable  to  be  commanded  or 
altered  by  any  fuperior  power. 

But  1  intended  hcje  principally  to  make  t&e  following  ab- 
jervation.  The  fundamental  principle  of  cur  government  is., 
"  The  right  of  a  people  to  give  and  grant  their  own  money." 
— It  is  of  no  confequence,  in  this  cafe,  whether  we  enjoy  this 
right  in  a  proper  raanner  or  not*  Moir.  cepainiy  vv£  do  not. 
jt  is,  however,  the  principle  on  which  our  government,  as  at 
free  government,  is  founded.  The  fpir.it.  or  the  Confritut'ien 
"&ives  it  us ;  and  however  imperfectly  enjoyed,  we  glory  in  ic 
is  our  flrft  and  greateft  blefTm^.  It  was  an  attempt  to  encroach 
upon  this  right,  in  a  trifling  inftance,  that  produced  a  civil 
war  in  the  re;gn  of  Charles. the  iirfl. —  Ought  rot  our  brethren 
fh  America  to  enjoy  this  right  as  well  as  ourfelves  ?  Do  th< 
principles  of  the  Conftitution  give  it  us,  but  deny  it  to  them  J 
Or  can  we,  with  any  decency,  pretend  that  when  we  give  to 
the  King  their  money,  we  give  him  cur  ewh  f* — What  differ- 
ence does  it  make,  that  in  the  time  otCharrUs  the  Firj'l  the  at- 
tempt to  take  away  this  rig&t  was  mr.ee  by  one  man  \  but  that,, 
in  {he  cafe  of  jmerlyz*  it  is  made  by  a  body  of  men  ? 

In  a  word.  This  is  a  war  undertaken  not  oniy  agairil  thfi 
principles  of  our  own  Conftitu-Jon,  but  en  purpofe  to  defiroy 
other  fimilar  Constitutions  in  America  ;  2nd  to  fubftitutc  m 
their  room  a  military  force.  See  page  14,  1  c — It  is,  therefore, 
3  grofs  and  iL-gran:  violation  of  the  ConiHtutionS 


E  C  T. 


*  Tbe  author  cf  Taxgthz    no   Tyrapry   will  iir.rfcubtaHjr  slfert  fhk 

without  beiiratior,  toY  j»/  pu^e  69  j.J^n.i  ;:<<•.;  t'Ui  pr*?«rt!  Gtustion 
Pfith  refpect  to  the  CoUries  to  t:  at  of  tie  im-urr'  Scjttumt,  wio 
upon  returning  Jrom  a  war,  found  thtwjihxa  jiat  Cut  "oj  tt.iir  cvl% 
houses  by  tbeir  s  l  a_v  e  s  . 


(     so     ) 

SECT.      W. 

Of  the  Policy  of  the  War  with  America. 

IN  writing  the  prefent  fection,  1  have  entered  upon  a  fubje& 
of  the  hft  importance,  on  which  much  has  been  faid  by 
other  writers  with  great  force,  and  in  the  ableft  manner.  * 
But  f  am  not  willing  to  omit  any  topic  which  I  think  of  great 
importance,,  meerly  becaufe  it  has  already  been  difcufled: 
And,,  with  refpett  to  this  in  particular,  it  will,  i  believe,  be 
found  that  fome  of  the  obfervations  on  which  I  fhafl  infift, 
fcave  not  been  fufficiently  attended  to. 

The  object  of  this  war  has  been  often  enough  declared  to  be 
**  maintaining  the  fupremacy  of  this  country  over  the  Colonies/' 
I  have  already  enquired  how  far  reafon  and  juftice,  the  princi- 
ples of  Liberty,  and  the  rights  of  humanity,  entitle  us  to  this 
tfupremacy.  Setting  afide,  therefore,  now,  all  confederations 
oi  this  kind,  1  wouJd  obferve,  that  this  fupr-emacy  i  is  to  be 
maintained,,  either  meerly  for  its  own  fakey  or  for  the  fake  of 
fome  public  intereft  conneded  with  it  and  dependent  upon  it. 
—If for  its  own  fake,  the  only  object  of  the  war  is  the  exten- 
fion  of  dominion  ;  ana*  its  only  motive  js  the  luft  of  power. — • 
All  government,  even-  within  a  ftate,  becomes  tyrannical,  as 
far  as  it  is  a  needlefs  and  wanton  exercife  of  power  ;  or  is  car- 
lied  farther  than  is  abfolutely  necefFary  to  preferve  the  peace 
and  fecure  the  fafety  of  the  ftate.  This  is  what  an  excellent 
writer  calls  governing  too  much  ;  and  its  effects  muft 
always  be,  weakening  government  by  rendering  it  contempt- 
ible and  odious. — Nothing  can  be  of  more  importance,  in 
governing  diitant  provinces  and  adjufting  the  clafhing  interefts 
of  different  focieties,  than  attention  to  this  remark.  In  thefe 
cireumftances;  it  is  particularly  necefTary  to  make  afparing  uh 
©f  power. — Happy  would  it  have  been  for  Gr rat-Britain,  had 
this  been  remembered  by  thofe  who  have  lately  conducted  its 
ftftairs.  But  our  poUcy  has  been  of  another  kind.  At  a 
period  when  our  policy  fhouM  have  been  mod  concealed,  it 
has  been  brought  moft  in  view  ^  and,  by  a  progrefliori  of  vio- 
lent meafures,  every  one  of  which  has  increafed  diftreft,  we 
(fcsve  given  the  world  reafon  to  conclude,  that  we  arc  acquainted 

gfitb  nu  oiher  method  of  goveining  than  by  feres- What  a 

mocking 

;*  See  particularly,  A  Speech   intended  to  have  been  fpoken  on  the 

rr-y  tor  altering    the   Clvrter    of  the  Colony  of  MafVachufetti-  Ray  ;— « 

Phe  Coniidcrations  on  the  meafures  carrying  on  with  refpeft  to  the  Britifly 

(Colonies  j  and  the  two  Appeals  ^o  the  jtvitice  ?.nd  Irtercft*  or  the  People. 


(     5«     ) 

Shocking  mifiake!  —  If  our  objett  is  power,  we  laould  ha** 
known  better  how  to  ufe  it ;  and  our  rulers  fhould  have  con- 
fidered,  that  freemen  will  always  revolt  at  the  fight  of  a  naked 
fword  ;  and  that  the  complicated  affairs  of  a  great  kingdom, 
holding  in  fubordination  to  it  i.  multitude  of  <hitant  communi- 
ties, all  jealous  of  their  rights,  and  warmed  with  fpirits  as 
high  as  our  own,  require  not  only  the  moft  fkilful,  but  the 
ttioft  cautious  and  tender  management.  The  confequences  of 
a  different  management  we  are  now  feeling.  We  lee  ourielv.es 
driven  among  rocks,  and  in  danger  of  being  loft. 

There  are  the  following  leafons  which  feem  to  make  it  too 
probable,  that  the  prefent  coiiteft  with  America  is  a  conteii 
for  power  only,  %  abftraaed  from  all  the  advantages  connected 
with  it. 

ift.  There  is  a  love  of  power  for  its  own  fake  inherent  in 
human  nature ;  and  it  cannot  be  uncharitable  to  fuppofe  that 
the  nation  in  general,  and  the  cabinet  in  particular,  are  too 
likely  to  be  influenced  by  it.  What  can  be  more  flattering 
than  to  look  acrofs  the  Atlantic^  and  to  fee  in  the  boundlels 
Continent  of  America  ificreafing  millions,  whom  we  have  a 
tight  to  order  as  we  pleafe,  who  hold  their  property  at  «our<dtf- 
pofal,  and  who  have  no  other  law  than  our  will.  With  what 
complacency  have  We  been  ufed  to  talk  of  them  a-s  our  fub- 
je£ts?-^-Is  it  not  the  interruption  they  now  give  to  this  plea- 
fure  ?  Is  it  not  the  opposition  they  make  to  our  pride,  and  not 
an  injury  they  have  done  us,  that  is  the  fecret  fpring  of  our 
prefent  animofity  againft  them  :  —  I  wifh  all  in  this  kingdoEa 
would  examine  themfelves  carefully  on  this  point.  Perhaps,,' 
fchey  might  find,  that  they  have  not  known  what  fprrit  they 
are  of.  —  Perhaps,  they  would  become  fenfible,  that  it  was  a 
fpirit  of  domination  more  than  a  regard  to  the  tree  intereft»o£ 
this  country,  that  lately  led  fo  many  of  them,  with  fuch  favage 
folly,  to  addrefs  the  throne  for  the  fiaughter  of  their  brethren 
jn  Jfmefica,  if  they  will  not  fubmk  to  them  ;  and  to  make  of- 
fers of  their  lives  and  fortunes  for  that  purpofe.  Indeed  i  am 
perfuaded,  that,  were  pride  and  the  luft  of  dominion  extermi- 
nated from  every  heart  among  us,  and  the  humility  of  Chriftians 
infufed  in  theii  room,  this  quarrel  would  be  foon  ended. 

idly.  Another 

%  I  have  heard  it  faid  by  a  perfoa  in  one  of  the  firft  departments  of 
tht  ftate,  that  the  present  conteft  if  for  som'inios  oa  the  fidt  of  the. 
Colonies,  as  well  as  on  our*  :  Aad  Co  it  is,  indeed,  but  with  this  <?£-, 
ftntial  difference — We  are  itruggiing  for  dormuion  over  others.  T&p 
tfre  ftrujfglin^  for  sflf  danainion  :  Tiie  ntfbieft  of  aft  bte&ugf.-- 


(       32        ) 

9  idiy.  ArrotJier  reafon  for  believing  that. this  :is  a  contefl  fas- 
power  only  is,  that  our  Minifters  have  frequently  declare^ 
that  their  object  i*  not  to  draw  a  revenue  from.  America  ;  and 
that  many  of  thofe  who  are  warmed  for  continuing  it>  repre- 
sent the  American  trade  as  of  no  great  confequencc 

Bat  what  deferves  particular  consideration  here  is,  that  this 
is  a  conceit  from  which  no  advantage  can  pofiibly  be  derived. 
Not  a  revenue  :  For  the  Provinces  of  America,  when  defo- 
lated,-  v/ill  afford  no  revenue;  or  if  they  (liould,  the  expence  of 
lubdurflg  them  and   keeping  them   in-  fubjecTlon,  will    much, 

exceed  jbat  revenue. *Not  any.cf  the  advantages  of  trade  : 

For  it  is  a  folly,  yexc  to  infinity,-  to  think  trade  can  be  pro-, 
moted  by  irnpoverifhing  our  cuttomers,  arid  fixing  in  their 
rrjinds  an  everla&ing  abhorrence  of  us.'  -It  remains,  there -, 
fore,  that  this  war  can  have.no  other  object  than  the  extenfion 

of  power. —  Miferable  refledlion  ! -To  fheathe  our  fwords* 

In  the  bowels  of  our  brethren,  and  fpread  mifery  and  ruin. 
among  a  happy  people,  for  no  other  end  than  ,to  oblige  them 
to  acknowledge  our  fupremacy.  How  horrid  !.  .This  is  the 
curfed  ambition  that  led  a  Cafiir  and  ap  Alexander^  and  many 
other  mad  conquerors,  to  attack  peaceful  communities,  and  to 
lay  waite  the  earth,     ,,  ■ 

But  a  vvorfe  principle  than  even  this  influences  fome  among, 
us.  Pride  and  the  love  of  dominion  are  principles  hateful 
enough  ;  but  blind  xefentment  and  the  defire  of  revenge  are 
infernal  principles  y  and  thefe,  I  am  afraid,  have  no  fmali 
fliare  at  prefenc  in  guiding  our  public  conduct.  One  cannot 
help  indeed  being  aftonifhed  at  the  virulence  with  which  fomc 

/peak  on  the  prefent  occaiion  again!!  the  Colonies. For, 

what  have  they  done?  Have  they  crofTed  the  ocean  and  inva- 
ded us  ?  Have  they  attempted  to  take  from  us  the  fruitsof  our 
labour,  and  to  overturn  that  form  of -government  which  we 
hold  (o  facred.  This  cannot  be  pretended. On  the  con- 
trary. This  is  what  we  have  done  to  them.— We  have  tranf- 
ported  ourfelves  to  their  peaceful  retreat%;  and  employed  our 
fleets  and  atmies  to  flop  up  their  ports,  to  deftroy.  their  com- 
merce, to  feize  their  effects  and  to  burn  their  towns.  Would 
ve  but  let  them  alone,  and  fuffer  them  to  enjoy  in  fecurity 
their  property  and  governments,  inftead  of  difturbing  ust 
they  would  thank  and  blefs  us.  And  yet  it  is  we  who  ima- 
gine ourfelves  ill  ufed. The  truth  is,  we  expected  to  find 

them  a  cowardly  rabble,  who  would  lie  quietly  at  our  feet, 

and 


C    33     ) 

and  they  have  difappointeel  us.  They  have  rifen  in  their  own 
defence,  and  repelled  force  by  force.  They  deny  the  pleni- 
tude of  our  power  over  them  ;   and  infill  on  being  treated  as 

free  communities. » It  is  this  that  has  provoked  us  ;  and 

kindled  our  governors  into  rage. 

I  hope  I  ihall  not  be  here  underftood  to  intimate,  that  all 
who  promote  this  war  are  actuated  by  thefe  principles.  Some, 
I  doubt  not,  are  influenced  by  no  other  principle,  than  a  re- 
gard to  what  they  think  the  juft  authority  of  this  country  over 
its  Colonies,  and  to  the  unity  and  indivifibility  of  the  Britifh 
Empire.  I  wifh  fuch  could  be  engaged  to  enter  thoroughly 
into  the  enquiry,  which  has  been  the  fubjeft  of  the  firil  part 
of  this  pamphlet;  and  to  confider,  particularly,  how  different 
a  thing  maintaiaing  the  authority  of  government  within  a 
ftate  is  from  mainlining  the  authority  of  one  people  over 
another,  already  happy  in  the  enjoyment  of  a  government  of 
their  own.  1  wilh  farther  they  would  confider,  that  the  deiire 
of  maintaining  authority  is  warrantable,  only  as  far  as  it  is  the 
means  of  promoting  fome  end,  and  doing  fome  good  ;  and  that, 
before  we  refolve  to  fpread  famine  and  hre  through  a  country 
in  order  to  make  it  acknowledge  our  authority,  we  ought  to 
be  allured  that  great  advantages  will  arife  not  onlv  to  ourfelves 

but  to  the  country  we  wifh  to  conquer. That  from  the 

prefent  conteft  no  advantage  to  ourfelves  can  arife,  has  been 
already  fbewn,  and  will  prefently  be  (hewn  more  at  large. — 
That  no  advantage  to  the  Colonies  can  arife  from  it,  need 
not,  I  hope,  be  fhewn.  It  has  however  been  aliened*  that  even 
their  good  is  intended  by  this  war.  Many  of  us  are  perfuaded^ 
that  they  will  be  much  happier  under  our  government,  than 
under  any  government  of  their  own  ;  and  that  their  liberties 
will  be  fafer  when  held  for  them  by  us,  than  when  trulfed  in 
their  own  hands.— — -How  kind  is  it  thus  to  take  upon  us  the 
trouble  of  judging  for  them  what  is  moft  for  their  happinefs  ? 
Nothing  can  be  kinder  exce'pt  the  refolution  we  have  formed 
to  exterminate  them,  if  they  will  not  fubmit  to  our  judgment. 
— — What  ttrange  language  have  I  fometimes  heard  ?  By  an 
armed  force  we  are  now  endeavouring  to  deftroy  the  laws  and 
governments  of  America;  and  yet  1  have  heard  it  faid,  that 
we  are  endeavouring  to  fupport  law  and  government  there. 
We  are  infilling  upon  our  right  to  levy  contributions  upon 
them  ;  and  to  maintain  this  right,  we  are  bringing  upon  them 
fill  the  miferies  a  people  can  endure;  and  yet  it  is  afierted, 
that  we  mean  nothing  but  their  fecurity  and  happinefs. 

£  Bat 


(     34     ) 

But  I  have  wandered  a  little  from  the  point  T  intended  prin- 
cipally to  in  lift  upon  in  t<  is  fedli.  n.  which  is,  "  the  folly,  in 
"  refpecf.  of  oohcv,  of  the  meafures  which  have  brougnt  on 
**  this  contcft  ;   and  its  pernicious  and  fata!  tendency." 

7>ie  following  obfervauons  will,  I  beiieve,  abundantly 
prove  this. 

i/t.  There  are  points  which  are. likely  always  to  fufTer  by 
difcuiTion.  Of  this  k:nd  are  mo-t  points  of  authority  and  pre- 
rogative j  and  the  belt,  polic,  is  to  avoid,  as  much  as  poffible, 
giving  an     occafion  for  calling  them  into  queition. 

The  Colonies  were  at  the  beginning  of  this  reign  in  the 
habit  of  acknowledging  our  authority,  and  of  allowing  us  as 
much  power  over  them  as  our  in  ereft  required  ;  and  m  >re,  in 
fume  initances,  than  ve  could  re.jfonably  ciaim.  This  habit 
they  would  have  retained  ;  and  h*d  we,  initead  of  impofing 
new  burdens  upon  them,  and  incieaiing  their  reftra  nts,  itudicd 
to  promote  their  commerce,  and  to  grant  them  new  indulgen- 
ce s,  they  would  have  been  always  growing  more  attached  to 
us.  Luxury,  and,  together  with  it,  their  dependance  upon  us, 
and  our  influence  ||  in  their  aflemblies,  would  have  increased, 
ti  in  time  perhaps  they  would  become  as  corrupt  as  ou  f  Kes; 
and  we  might  have  fucceeded  to  our  wifhes  in  eilabiiih  ng 
ou«  authority  over  them  -  -But,  happily  for  them,  we  have 
chofen  a  different  courfe.  B>  exertions  of  authority  which 
have  alarmed  them,  they  have  been  put  upon  examining  into 
the  grounds  of  all  our  claims,  and  forced  to  give  up  their 
luxuries,  and  to  feek  all  their  refources  within  themf  Ives  : 
And  the  ilTue  is  lively  to  prove  the  lofs  of  all  our  authority 
over  them,  and  of  all  the  advantages  connected  *ith  it.  So 
little  do  men  in  power  fometimes  know  how  to  pieferve 
power;  and  fo  remarkably  does  the  defire  of  extending  do- 
minion fometimes  deftrov  it.- Mankind  are  naturally  dif- 

pofed  to  continue  in  fubje&ion  to  that  mode  of  government, 
be  it  /hat  it  will,  under  which  the  have  been  born  and  edu- 
cated. Nothing  roufes  them  into  reiiitance  but  grofs  abufes, 
or  fome  particular  opprelTions  out  of  the  road  to  which  they 
have  been  ufed.  And  he  who  will  examine  the  hiftory  of  the 
world  will  find,  there  has  generally  been  more  reafon  for  com- 
plaining that  they  have  been  too  patient,  than  that  they  have 
been  turbulent  and  rebellious. 

Our 

|1  This  his  '^een  our  policy  with  refpeft  to  the  people  of  Ireland ;  and 
the  cor)f>  queme  is,  that  we  now  its  taeir  Parliament  as  obedient  as  we 
can  with. 


f    35    ) 

Our  governors,  ever  fince  I  can  remember,  have  been 
jealous  that  the  Colonies,  iomc  time  or  otnei,  would  throw  off 
their  dependence.  Thio  jealoufy  was  not  founded  on  any  of 
their  acts  or  declarations.  They  have  al  vays,  while  ar  peace 
with  us,  difcliinicd  any  fuch  dciign  ;  and  thty  have  continued 
to  difclaim  it  fince  they  have  been  at  war  with  us  1  have 
reafon,  indeed,  to  believe,  that  independency  is,  even  at  this 
morwenr,  generally  dreaded  ariong  tnem  as  a  calamity  to 
which  they  are  in  danger  of  being  driven,    in  order  to  avoid  a 

greater. Tne  jealoufy    I  have   mentioned  was,    however, 

natural  ;  and  betrayed  a  fecret  opinion,  that  the  fubjection  m 
which  they  were  held  was  more  than  ve  could  expect  them 
always  to  enduie.  In  fuch  circumtance?,  all  poilible  care 
fhouid  have  been  talcen  to  give  them  no  reafon  for  difconcent ; 
and  to  prefer  ve  them  in  fubjeciion,  by  keepmg  in  tnat  l.ne  of 
conduct  to  which  cuftom  had  reconciled  them,  or  at  leati  never 
deviating  from  it,  except  with  great  caution  ;  and  particularly, 
by  avoiding  all  direct  attacks  09  tneir  property  and  legislations. 
Had  we  done  th's,  the  different  interests  of  io  many  ftates 
fostered  over  a  valt  continent  joine/1  to  our  own  prudence 
and'moderation,  woulJ  have  enabled  us  to    maintain   them  in 

dependence,  for  ages  to   come. But    infiead   of  this,  how 

feave  sve  acted  ? it  is  in  truth  too  evident,  that  our  whole 

conduct,  in  (lead  of  being  directed  by  that  found  policy  and 
forefight  which  in  fuch  circumstances  wereabio!utel\  neceiTa.-y, 
has  been  nothing  (to  fay  the  beft  of  it)  but  a  feiies  of  the 
blindeft  rigour  followed  by  letractation  ;  of  violence  followed 
by  conceifun  ,  or  mitajce,  vveaknefsand  ineonliitency.--— —  A 
recital  of  a  few  facts,  within  every  body's  recollection,  will 
fully  prove  this. 

In  the  6th  of  George  the  Second \  an  act  was  paiTed  for  impo- 
fing  certain  duties  on  all  foreign  fpirits,  molaffes  and  fugars 
imporred  into  the  plantations,  in  this  act,  the  duties  impofed 
are  fa  d  to  be  given  and  granted  by  the  Pailiament  to 
the  King  :  and  this  is  the  firlt  American  act  in  which  thefe 
words  have  been  ufed.  But  notwichilanding  this,  as  the  act 
had  the  appearance  of  being  only  a  regulation  of  trade,  the 
Colonies  fubmitted  to  it  ;   and  a  fmall  direel  revenue  was.drawn 

by  it  from  them. -In  the  4th  Gf  the   prefent  reign,  many 

alterations  were  made  in  this  a£t,  with  the  declared  purpofe 
.of  making  provifion  for  raifing  a  revenue  in  America.  Tnis 
alarmed  tne  Colonies  j  and   produced  difcontents  and  remon- 

E  2  (trances^ 


(   sO 

Frances,  which  might  have  convinced  our  rulers  that  this  was 
tender  jr.iumi,  on  -vhich  it  became  them  to  tread  very  gently, 

• There  is,   however,   no  reafon  to  doubt  but  in  time  they 

would  have  funk  into  a  quiet  fubmiilion  to  this  revenue  a<Sr% 
as  being  at  worit  only  the  exercife  or"  a  power  which  then 
they  feem  not  to  have  thought  much  of  contefting  j  I  mean, 

the  power  of  taxing  them  externally. But  before  they 

had  time  to  cool,  a  worie  provocation  was  given  them  j  and 
the  Stamp- Act  was  paiTed.  This  being  an  attempt  to  tax 
them  internally  ;  and  a  direct  attack  on  their  property, 
by  a  power  which  w^uld  not  /ufftr  itfelf  to  be  qutftioned  ; 
which  eafed  itfelf "by  loading  them  ;  and  to  which  it  was  lm- 
poilible  to  fix  any  bounds  -,  they  were  thrown  at  on<  e,  from 
one  end  o!  the  continent  to  the  other,  into  reiiftance  and  rage. 
'Government,  d  eading  theconfequences,  gave  way  ;  and 
th,  i  ai  iam-  nt  (upon  a  change  of  miniitry)  repealed  the  Stamp- 
Aft,  without  requiring  from  them  any  recognition  of  its 
authority,  or  dom^  any  more  to  preierve  its  dignity,  than 
ailerting  by  the  declaratory  law,  that  it  was  pofleiTed  of  full 
power  and  authority  to  make  lavs   to   bind  them  in  all  cafes 

whatever. -Upon  this,    pe^ce    was   reitored  ;  and,  had  no 

farther  attempts  of  the  fame  kind  been  made,  they  would  un- 
doubtedly have  fuffered  us  (as  the  people  of  Ireland  have  done) 
to  enjoy  our  declaratory  law.  They  would  have  recovered 
their  former  habits  of  fubjedtion  ;  and  our  connexion  with 
them  might  have  continued  an  increafing  lburceofour  wealth 

and  gl;rv. :3ut  the  fpirit  of  defpotifm  and  avarice,    always 

blind  and  reftlefs,  loon  broke  forth  again.  The  fcheme  for 
drawing  a  revenue  from  America^  by  parliamentary  taxation, 
was  refurrued  j  and  in  a  little  more  than  a  year  after  the  repeal 
of  the  Stamp  4&,  when  all  was  peace,  a  third  a£i  was  paiTcd, 
impofing  duties  payable  in  America  on  tea,  paper,  glafs,  pain- 
ters colours,  &c— — This,  as  might  have  been  expected,  re- 
vived all  the  former  heats  ;  and  the  Empire  vvas  a  fecond  time 
threatened  with  the  moft  dangerous  commotions. — Govern- 
ment receded  again  ;  and  the  Parliament  (under  another 
change  of  miniitry)  repealed  all  the  obnoxious  duties,  except 
that  upon  tea.  This  exception  was  made  in  order  to  main- 
tain a  ihew  of  dignity.  But  it  was,  in  reality,  facrificing 
fafety  to  pride  ;  and  leaving  a  fplinter  in  the  wound  to  pro- 
duce a  gangrene. For  fome  time,  however,  this  relaxation 

anfwered  its  intended  purpofes.     Our  commercial  intercourfe 

with 


(     37     ) 

with  the  Colonies  was  again  recovered  ;  and  they  avoided 
fiothing  but  that  tea  which  we  had  excepted  in  our  repeal. 
In  this  ftate  would  things  hxwt  remained,  and  even  tea  would 
perhaps  in  time  have  been  gradually  admitted,  had  not  the 
evil  genius  of  Britain  ftepped  forth  once  more  to  embroil  the 
Empire. 

The  Eajl-lndia  company  having  fallen  under  difficulties, 
partly  in  confequence  of  the  lofs  of  the  American  market  for 
tea,  a  fcheme  was  formed  for  aflifting  them  by  an  attempt  to 
recover  that  market.  With  this  view  an  aci  was  paffed  to 
enable  them  to  export  their  tea  to  America  free  of  ail  duties 
here,  and  fubjecl  only  to  3d.  per  pound  duty,  payable  in 
America.  By  this  expedient  they  were  enabled  to  offer  it  at  a 
low  price  ;  and  it  was  expected  the  confequence  would  prove 
that  the  Colonies  would  be  tempted  by  it  ;  a  precedent  gained 
for  taxing  them,  and  at  the  fame  time  the  company  relieved. 
Ships  were,  therefore,  fitted  out  ;  and  large  cargoes  lent. 
The  fnare  was  too  grofs  to  efcape  the  notice  of  the  Colonies. 
They  faw  it,  and  fpumed  at  it.  They  refufed  to  admit  the  tea  -9 
and  at  Boston  fome  perlons  in  difguife  buried  it  in  the 
fea.— Had  our  governors  in  this  cafe  fatisfied  themfelves 
wkh  requiring  a  compenfatfon  from  the  province  for  the 
damage  done,  there  is  no  doubt  but  it  would  havebeen  granted. 
Or  had  they  proceeded  no  farther  in  the  infliction  0!  punifh- 
ment,  than  (topping  up  the  port  and  deftroying  the  trade  cf 
Bofton,  till  compenfation  was  made,  the  province  might 
poffibly  have  fubmitted,  and  a  fufficient  laving  wouid  have 
been  gained  for  the  honour  of  the  nation.  But  having  hi- 
therto proceeded  without  wifd«m,  they  obferved  now  no 
bounds  in  their  refentment.  To  the  Bofton  port  biil  was 
added  a  bill  which  deitroyed  the  chartered  government  of  the 
province  ;  a  bill  which  withdrew  from  the  jurifdiciion  of  the 
province,  perfons  who  in  particular  cafes  fhould  commit  mur- 
der ;  and  the  Quebec  bill.  .  At  the  fame  time  a  ilrong  body 
of  troops  were  itationed  .at  Bofton  to  enforce  obedience  to 
thofe  bills. 

*  All  who  knew  any  thing  of  the  temper  of  the  Colonies 
faw  that  the  efTectofall  fudden  accumulation  of  vengeance, 
would  probably  be  not  intimidating  but  exafperating  them,  and 
driving  them  into  a  general  revolt.  But  our  minztiers  had 
different  apprehennons.  They  believed  that  the  maleccntenu 
in  the  cotany  of  Majjachujttf *   v.ere  a  final!  party,   headed  by 

a 
*  See  the  Appendix. 


(     3«     ) 

a  few  factious  men  ;  that  the  majority  of  the  people  would 
take  the  fide  of  government,  as  ioon  as  thev  law  a  force 
among  them  capable  of  fupporting  tnem  ;  that,  at  uorlr,  the 
Colonies  in  general  would  never  make  a  common  caufe  with 
this   province  ;  and   thar,    the  liTae    would    prove,  in   a   few 

months,  order,    tranquility  and  fubmiflio.i. Every  one  of 

thefe  apprehenfions  was  fal'fified  by  the  event  that  followed. 

When  the  bills  1  have  mentioned  came  to  be  carried  into 
execution,  the  whole  Province  was  thrown  into  confufion. 
Their  courts  of  jufrice  were  fhut  up,  and  all  government  was 
diiTolvel.  The  commander  in  chief  found  it  neceflary  to 
fortify  himftlf  in  Boston  ;  and  the  other  Colonirs  immedi- 
ately refolved  to  m;jke  a  common  caufe  with  this  Colony. 

So  ftrangely  mifinformed  were  our  minifters,  that  this  was 
all  a  furprize  upon  them.  They  took  fright,  therefore;  and 
once  more  made'  an  effort  to  retreat;  but  indeed  the  mo.ft 
ungracious  one  that  can  well  be  imagined.  A  propofal  was 
fen t  to  the  Colonies,  called  conciliatory  ;  and  the  fubftance 
of  which  was,  that  if  any  of  them  would  raife  fuch  fums  as 
fhould  be  demanded  of  them  bv  taxing  themfelves,  the  Par- 
liament   would    forbear    to   tax    them It  will  be  fcarcejy 

believed,  hereafter,  that  fuch  a  propofal  could  be  thought 
conciliatory.  It  was  only  telling  them  ;  "  it  you  will  tax 
*c  yourfelves  by  our  order,  we  will  fave  ourfelves  the  trou- 

"  ble  of  taxing   you." -They  received  the  propofal  as  an 

infult  ;  and  rejected  it  with  difdain. 

At  the  time  this  conceffion  was  tranfmitted  to  America^ 
©pen  hoiliJities  were  not  berjun.  In  the  fword  our  mmitlers 
thought  they  frill  had  a  refource  which  would  immediately 
fettle  all  clifputes.  They  confldered  the  people  of  New- E  tig- 
land  as  nothing  but  a  mob,  who  would  be  foon  routed  and 
•forced  into  obedience.  It  was  even  believed,  that  a  few 
thoufands  of  our  army  might  march  through  all  America,  and 
inake  all  quiet  where-evcr  thev  went.  Under  this  conviclion 
our  minifters  did  not  dread  urging  the  Province  of  Majfacbu- 
[etts-Bay  into  rebellion,  by  ordering  the   army  to  feixe   their 

ft  ores,  and    to  take   up  fome  of  their  leading  men. 1  he 

attempt  was  made. The  people  immediately  fled  to  arms, 

and  repelled  the  attack. A  considerable  part  ot  the  flower 

oftheBritifn  army   has  been   deftroyed. Some  of  our  beft 

Generals,  and  the  braveft.  of  our  tror  ps,  are  now  djfgracefully 

mod  miferably  imprifoned  at  Bo/ton. A   horrid  civil   war  is 

tommmced  ; — and  the  Empire  is  d-iitrac~ted  and  convulfed. 

Can 


(     39    ) 

Can  it  be  pofiible  to  think  with  patience  of  the  policy  that 
has  brought  us  into  thefe  circumftances  ?  Did  ever  Heaven 
punifh  the  vices  of  a  people  more  feverely  by  darkening  their 
counfels  ?  How  great  would  be  our  hdppinefs  could  we  now 
recal  former  times,  and  return  to  the  policy  of  the  lafi  reign3? 
But  thfefe  times  are  gone. — !  will,  however  beg  leave 
for  a  few  moments  to  lo<  k  back  to  them  ;  and  to  compare  the 
ground  we  have  left  wi.h  mat  on  which  we  find  ourfelves. 
This  muft  be  done  with  deep  regret  ;  but  it  forms  a  neceflary 
part  of  my  prefent  Jehgn. 

In  thofe  times  our  Colonies,  foregoing  every  advantage 
which  they  might  derive  from  trading  with  foreign  nations^ 
confemed  to  f;nd  onl/  to  us  whatever  it  was  for  our  intercil: 
to  receive  from  them  i  and  to  receive  only  from  us  whatever  it 
was  for  our  interell  to  fend  to  them.  They  gave  up'the  power 
of  making  furnptuary  laws,  and  expofed  themfelves  to  all  the 
evils  of  an  increafing  and  wafteful  luxury,  became  we  were 
benefitted  by  vending  anions  the  n  the  materials  of  it.  The 
iron  with  which  Piovi'ence  had  bleiled  their  country,  they 
were  required  by  la  as,  in  h  hich  they  acquielced,  to  tranfport 
hither,  that  our  p-  ople  might  be  maim:  ii*  d  by  working  it  for 
them  into  nails,  ploughs,  axes,  &c.  And,  in  feveral  ir.Oances* 
even  one  Colony  was  not  allowed  to  (apply  anv  neighbouring 
Colonies  with  commodities  which  could  be  conveyed  to  them 
from  hence. — But  they  yielded  much  farther.  They  con  fen  ted 
that  we  fhould  have  the  appointment  of  one  branch  of  their 
legiflaiure.  By  recognizing  as  their  King,  a  King  refident 
among  us  and  under  our  influence,  the.  gave  us  a  negative  oa 
all  their  laws.  By  allowing  an  appeal  to  u^  in  their  civil  dis- 
putes, they  gave  us  <li  Ice  wife  the  ultimate  determination  of  ail 
civil  caufes  among  them. — in  fliort.  Trey  allowed  us  every 
power  we  could  defire,  except  that  of  taxing  them,  and  inter- 
fering in  their  internal  legislations :  And  they  had  admitted 
precedents,  which,'  even  in  thefe  inftances,  gave  us  no  incon* 
liderable  authority  over  them.  By  purchaLng  our  goods  they 
paid  our  taxes :  and,  by  allowing  us  to  regulate  their  trade  in 
any  manner  we  thought  molt  tor  our  advantage,  they  enriched 
our  merchants,  and  helped  us  to  bear  our  growing  burdens- 
They  fought  our  battles  with  us.  They  gloried  in  their  re- 
lation to  us.  All  their  gaino  centered  among  us  ;  and  they 
always  fpoke  of  this  country  and  looked  to  it  as  their  home. 

Such 


C    40    ) 

Such  wax  the  ftate  of  things. What  is  it  now  ? 

Not  contented  with  a  degree  of  power,  fufficient  to  fatisfy 
any  reafonable  ambition,  we  have  attempted  to  extend  it. 
Not  contented  with  drawing  from  them  a  large  revenue  itt- 
direclly,  we  have  endeavoured  to  procure  one  direftly  by  art 
authoritative  feizure;  and,  in  order  to  gain  a  pepper-corn  in 
this  wav,   have  chofen  to    hazard    millions,  acquired  br  the 

peaceable    imercourfe   of  trade. Vile   policy  !     What  a 

fcourge  js  government  fo  conducted  1 'Had   we   never  de- 

ferted  our  old  ground  :  Had  we  nourished  and  favoured  Ame- 
rica, with  a  view  to  commerce,  inftead  of  confidering  it  as  a 
country  to  be  governed:  Had  we,  like  a  liberal  and  wife 
people,  rejoiced  to  fee  a  multitude  of  free  States,  branch- 
ed forth  from  ourfelves,  all  enjoying  independent  legif- 
latures  fimilar  to  our  own  :  Had  we  aimed  at  binding  them 
to  us  only  by  the  ties  of  affeclion  and  intereft,  and  contented 
ourfelves  with  a  moderate  power  rendered  durable  by  being 
lenient  aud  friendly,  an  umpire  in  their  differences,  an  aid 
to  them  in  improving  their  own  free  governments,  and  their 
common  bulwark  againft  theaflaults  of  foreign  enemies  :  Had 
this,  1  fay,  been  our  policy  and  temper  ;  there  is  nothing  fo 
great  or  happy  that  we  might  not  have  expe&ed.  With  their 
increafe  our  ftrength  would  have  increafed.  A  growing  fur- 
plus  in  the  re/enue  might  have  been  gained,  which,  invari- 
ably applied  to  the  gradual  difcharge  of  the  national  debt, 
would  have  delivered  us  from  the  ruin  with  which  it  threa- 
tens us.  The  Liberty  of  America  might  have  preferved  our 
Liberty;  and  under  the  direction  of  a  patriot  King  or  wife 
Minitteij  proved  the  means  of  reftoring  to  us  our  alraoft  loft 
Conftitution.  Perhaps,  in  time,  we  might  alfo  have  been 
brought  to  fee  the  neceffity  of  carefully  watching  and  refract- 
ing our  paper-credit :  And  thus  we  might  have  regained  fafety  j 
and,  in  union  with  our  Colonies,  have  been  more  than  a 
match  for  every  enemy,  and  rifen  to  a  fituation  of  honor  and 

dignity  never  before  known  amongfr.  mankind.- But  I  am 

forgetting  myfelf. — Our  Colonies  arelikely  to  be  loll:  for  ever. 
Their  love  is  turned  into  hatred,  and  their  refpecl:  for  our  go- 
vernment into  refentment  and  abhorrence. — — We  mall  fee 
more  dilHnclly  what  a  calamity  this  is,  and  the  obfervations 
I  have  now  made  will  be  confirmed*  by  attending  to  the  fol- 
lowing facts. 

Our 


(     41     3 

Our  American  Colonics,  particularly  the  Northern  one§, 
have  been  for  fome  time  in  the  very  happieft  ftate  of  fociety  ; 
or,  in  that  middle  (late  of  civilization,  between  its  nrft  rude 
and  its  laft  refined  and  corrupt  ftate.  Old  countries  confilf, 
generally,  of  three  clafles  of  people;  a  Gentry,  a  Yoe- 
manr.y,  and  a  Peasantry.  The  Colonies  confift  only  of 
a  body  of  Yoemanry  *  fupported  by  agriculture,  and  all 
independent,  and  nearly  upon  a  level;  in  confequence  of 
which,  joined  to  a  boundlefs  extent  of  country,  the  means  of 
fubfiftence  are  procured  without  difficulty,  and  the  tempta- 
tions to  wickenefs  arefoinconfiderable,  that  executions  f  are 
feldom  known  among  them.  From  hence  arifes  an  encou- 
ragement to  population  fo  great,  that  in  fonie  of  the  Colonies 
they  double  their  own  number  in  fifteen  years  ;  in  others,  in 
eighteen  years;  and  in  all,  taken  one  with  another,  in  twen- 
ty'rive  years. Such  an  increafe  was,  I  believe,  never  be- 
fore known.  It  demonftrates  that  they  mull  live  at  their 
eafe;  and  be  free  from  thofe  cares,  oppreffions,  and  difeafc* 
which  depopulate  and  ravage  luxurious  ftates. 

With  the  population  of  the  Colonies  has  increafed  their  trade, 
tut  much   fafter  on  account  of  the  gradual  introduction  of 

luxury  among  them. In  1723  the  exports  to  Pennfylvam* 

were  i6,ocol. — In  1742  they  were  75,2951. — In  1757  they 
were  increafed  to  268,4261. — And  in  1773  to  half  a  million. 

The  exports  of  all  the  Colonies  in  1744  were  640,1 14].— w 
In  1758,  they  were  increafed  to  1,832,948!.  and  in  1773,  to 
three  millions.  §  And  the  probability  is,  that,  had  it  not  beea 
for  the  difcontents  among;  the  Colonies  fine's  the  year  1764, 
our  trade  with  them  would  have  been  this  year  double  to  what 
it  was  in  1773 ;  and  that  in  a  few  years  more  it  would  not 
have  been  poffible  for  the  whole  kingdom,  though  co»fiit.ing 
only  of  manufacturers,  to  (upply  the  American  demand. 

F  This 

*  Excepting  the  Negroes  in  the  Southern  Colonies,  who  probably  wilt 

sow  either  foon  become  extinct,  or  have  their  condition  changed  ints 

that  of  Freemen. It  is  not  the  fault  of  the  Colonies  th  it  they  hav* 

among  rhem  fo  many  of  thofe  unhappy  people.  They  have  m  ide  law* 
to  prohibit  the  importation  of  them  ;  but  thefe  laws  have  always  bad 
a  negative  put  upon  them  here  becaufe  of  their  tendency  to  hurt  our 
Negro  trade. 

f  In  the  province  of  Maflachufetts-Bay  there  has  not  been,  I  am 
informed,  more  than  one  execution  thefe  1  3  years. 

§  Mr.  Burke  (in  his  excellent  and  admirable  Spep-h  on  m  win* 
his  resolutions  for  conciliation  with  theColon'es,  p.  9,  &c.)  has  ih-:  t\ 
that  oar  trade  to  the  Colonies,  including  that  to  Africa  and  the  #^.<r- 
laJies,  was  in  1771  ntnriy  equal  to  the  trade  wkirh  we  carried  on  jvitk 
tfae  whole  vfarid  at  the  begiunlsjj  »f  this  cent  wry. 


(      42       ) 

7  his  trade,  it  mould  be  confidered,  was  riot  only  thus  an 
increafing  trade;  but  it  was  a  trade  in  which  we  had  no  ri- 
vals; a  trade  certain,  conftant,  and  uninterrupted;  and 
which,  by  the  {hipping  employed  in  it,  and  the  naval  (lores 
fupplied  by  it,  contributed  greatly  to  the  fupport  of  that  navy 

which   is  our  chief   national   ftrength. -Viewed    in  thcfe 

light's  it  was  an  object  unfpeakably  important.  But  it  will 
appear  ftdl  more  fo  if  we  view  it  in  its  connexions  and  depen- 
dencies. It  is  well  known,  that  our  trade  with  Africa  and 
the  Weft- Indies  cannot  eafily  fubfift  without  it.  And,  upon 
the  whole,  it  is  undeniable,  that  it  has  been  one  of  the  ma  iff 
fprings  of  our  opulence  and  fplendour;"  and  that  we  have,  in 
a  great  meafure,  been  indebted 'to  it  for  our  ability  to  bear  a 
debt  fo  much  heavier,  than  that  which,  fifty  years  ago,  the 
wiled  men  thought  would  fink  us. 

This  ineftimable  prize,  and  all  the  advantages  connected 
with  America,  we  arc  now  throwing  away.  Experience  alone 
can  {hew  what  calamities  muft  follow.  It  will  indeed  be 
afton  idling  if  this  kingdom  can  bear  fuch  a'  lofs  without 
dreadful  confequences.- — — Thefe  confequences  have  been 
amply  reprefented  by  others  ;   and  it  is  needlefs  to  enter   into 

any  account  of  them -At  the  time  we  {hall  be  feeling  them 

■ -The  Empire  difmembered  ;  the  blood  of  thpufands  fhed 

in  an  unrighteous  quarrel  ;  our  ftrength  exhauftec!  ;  our  Mer- 
chants breaking  ;  our  manufacturers  ftarving;  our  debts  in- 
creafing; the  revenue  finking;  the  funds  tottering;  and  all 
the  miferies  of  a  public  bankruptcy  impending. — —At  fuch  a 
crifes  fliould  our  natural  enemies,  eager  for  our  ruin,  feize  the 

opportunity -The  apprehenfion  is  too  diftreffing. -Let 

us  view  this  fubjecl:  in  another  light. 

On  this  occafion,  particular  attention  mould  be  given  to 
the  prefent  singular  fituatiori  of  this  kingdom.  T hit  it  a 
circumftance  of  the  utmoft  importance  ;  and  as  I  am  afraid  it 
is  not  much  confidered,  I  will  beg  leave  to  give  a  dillincl:  ac- 
count of  it. 

At  the  Revolution  the  fpecie  of  the  Kingdom  amounted, 
according  to  *  Davenant's  account,  to  eighteen  millions  and  a 

half. From  the  Accession   to  the  year  1772  there  were 

coined  at  the  mint,  near  29  millions  of  gold;  and  in  ten' 
years  only  of  this  time,    or  from  January  1759   to  January 

1769 
if  S?e  Dr.  Divenant's  Works,  colle&erl  and  r«vifed  by  Sir  Charkt 
Whiiwoith,  V*l.  I.  P-ig«  363,  fee.  4.4.J,  fcC. 


(     43      ) 

I.769,  there  were  coined  eight  millions  and  a  half.*  But  It 
has  appeared  lately,  that  the  gold  fpecie  new  \ch  in  the  king- 
dom is  no  more  than  about  twelve  millions  and    a    half. *J* 

Not  fo  much  as  half  a  million  of  Silver  fpecie  has  been  coined 
theie  fixty  years  ;  and  it  cannot  be  fuppofed,  that  the  quantity 
of  it  now  in  circulation  exceeds  two  or  three  millions.  The 
whole  fpecie  of  the  kingdom',  therefore,  is  probably  at  this  time 
about  f  fourteen  or  fifteen  millions.     -Of  this  feveral  millions 

muft    be   hoarded    at    the   hank. .Our    circulating  fpecie^ 

therefore.,  appears  to  be  greatly  decreafed.  But  our\vea!th, 
or  the  quantity  of  money  in  the  kingdom,  is  greatly  increafed. 
This  is  paper  to  a  vafl:  amount,  iftued  in  almoft  every  corner 
of  the  kingdom  ;  and,  particularly,  by  the  Bank  of  England. 
While  this  paper  maintains  it*  creo'it  it  anfwers  all  the  pur- 
pofes  of  fpecie,  and  is  in  all  refp'r&s  the  fame  with  money. 

Specie  reprefents  fome  red  value  in  goods  or  commodities. 
On  the  contrary  ;  paper  reprefi  nts  immediately  nothing  but 
fpecie.  It  is  a  promife  or  obligation,  which  the  emitter  brings 
himfelf  under  to  pay  a  given  (urn  in  coin  ;  and  it  owes  its  cur- 
rency to  the  credit  oi  the  emitter ;  or  to  an  opinion  that  he  is 
able  to  make  good  his  engagement  ;  and  that  the  fum  fpecificd 
may  be  received  upon  being  demanded. — Paper,  therefore,  re- 
prefents coin;  and  coin  reprefents  real  Value.  T-nat  is,thcone  is 
zfign  of  wealth.  The  other  is  thefign  of  that  'fig  v. — But  farther. 
Coin  is  an  uni*uerjal figri  of  wealth,  and  will  procure  it  tvery 
where.  It  will  bear  any  alarm,  and  ftand  any  fhock. — On  the 
contrary.  Paper,  owing  its  currency  to  opinion,  has  only  a  local 
and  imaginary  value,  it  can  ftand  no  ihock.  It  isdeftro\ecj 
by  the  approach  of  danger  ;  0/  even  the  fufpicion  of  danger. 

In  fhort.  Coin  is  the  bafis  of  our  paper  credit  j  and  were 
it  either  all  deftroyed,  or  were  onlv  the  quantity  of  it  reduced 
beyond  a  certain  limit,  the  paper  circulation  of  the  kingdom 
wouM  fink  at  once.  B^ut,  wer"  our  paper  deftroyed,  the  coin 
would  not  only  remain,  but  rife  in  value,  in  proportion  to  the 
quantity  of  paper  deftroyed. 

From  this  account  it  follows,  ihat  a?  far  as,  in  any  circum- 
llances,  fpecie  is  not  to  be  procured  in  exchange  for  paper,  it 
reprefents  nothing,  and  is  worth  nothing. — The  fpecie  of  this- 
kingdom  is  incdnfiderab!ea  com  pared  with  the  amount  of  the}' 

F   2  papef 

*  See  Confederations  on  Money,  Bullicn,  &c,   pn?e  r  and  if. 
f  Or  nearly    the    fame  that  it  was  in   CrcmtL-iJVi  tisie.     See  Dr. 
Daveneat's  works*    Vcl.  I.  P*ge  y%  $. 


(     44     ) 

paper  circulating  in  it.  This  is  generally  believed  ;  and,  there* 
fore,  it  is  natural  to  enquire  how  its  currency  is  fupported. — . 
The  anfwer  is  eafy.  It  is  fupported  in  the  fame  manner  with 
all  other  bubbles.  Were  all  to  demand  fpecie  in  exchange  for 
tkeir  notes,  payment  could  not  be  made ;  but,  at  the  fame  time 
that  this  is  known,  every  one  trufts,  that  no  alarm  producing 
fueh  a  demand  will  happen,  while  he  holds  tne  paper  he  is  pof- 
fefTed  of;  and  that  if  it  mould  happen,  he  will  ftand  a  chance 
for  being  firft  paid;  and  this  makes  him  eafy.  And  it  alfo 
makes  all  with  whom  he  traffics  eafy.-— But  let  any  events 
happen  which  threaten  danger  ;  and  every  one  will  become 
dimdent.    A  run  will  take  piace,  and  a  bankruptcy  follow. 

This  is  an  account  of- what  has  often  happened  in  private 
credit.  And  it  is  alfo  an  account  of  what  will  (if  no  change 
of  meafures  takes  place)  happen  fome  time  or  other  in  public 
credit.  The  defcription  I  have  given  of  cur  paper-circulation 
implies,  that  nothingcan  be  more  delicate  or  hazardous.  It 
is  an  immenfe  fabrick,  with  its  head  in  the  clouds,  that  is  con- 
tinually trembling  with  every  adverfe  blaft  and  every  fluctua- 
tion of  trade;  and  which,1  like  the  bafelefs  fabrick  of  a  vifion, 
may  in  a  moment  vanifh,  and  leave  no  wreck  behind. — The 
definition  of  a  few  books  at  the  Bank  ;  an  improvement  in 
the  art  of  forgery  ;  the  landing  of  a  body  of  French  troops  on 
our  coafb  ;  infurreclions  threatning  a  revolution  in  govern- 
ment ;  or  any  events  that  mould  produce  a  general  panic, 
however  groundlefs,-  would  at  once  annihilate  it,  and  leave  us 
without  any  other  medium  of  tra£Ec,  than  a  quantity  of  fpecie 
fcarcely  equal  in  amount  to  the  money  now  drawn  from  the 
public  by  the  taxes.  It  would,  therefore,  become  impoflible 
to  pay  the  taxes.  The  revenue  would  fail.  Near  one  hun- 
dred and  forty  millions  of  property  would  be  deftroyed.  The 
whole  frame  of  government  would  fall  to  pieces ;  and  a  ftate 
©f  nature  would. take  place. — What  a  dreadful  fituation  !  it 
has  never  had  a  parallel  among  mankind  ;  except  at  one  time 
in  France  after  the  eihbliihment  of  the  Royal  Mijjifippi  Bank.' 
In  1 720  this  Bank  broke  ;*  and,  after  involving  for  fome  time 
the  whole  kingdom  in  a  golden  dreamy  fpread  through  it  in 
♦>ne  day,  defolation  and  ruin. — The  diftrefs  attending  iuch  an 
event/in  this  free  country,  would  be  greater  than  it  was  in 
France.  Happily  for  that  kingdom,  they  have  (hot  this  gulph. 
Paper-credit  has  never  fince  recovered  itfelt  there ;    and  their 

circulating 
*    See  Sir  James  Steuart's  Enquiry  into   the  Priciples  of  political 
4>oc«-aemy,  Vol.  II.  Book  4.  Cfcap.  yx. 


(     45     )  * 

Circulating  ca(h  confifts  now  all  of  folid  cain,  amounting,  I 
am  informed,  to  no  lefs  a  fum  than  fifteen  hundied  millions 
©f  Livres-y  or  near  fixty-fe/en  millions  of  pounds  iferling. — 
This  gives  them  unfpeakable  advantages;  and,  joined  to  that 
quick  reduction  of  their  debts  which  is  inseparable  *  from  their 
nature,  places  them  on  a  ground  of  fafety  which  we  have  rea- 
fon  to  admire  and  envy, 

Thefe  are  fubjects  on  which  I  fhould  have  chofen  to  be  {i- 
Jent,  did  I  not  think  it  neceiTary  that  this  country  fliould  be 
apprized  and  warned  of  the  danger  which  threatens  it.  This 
danger  is  created  chiefly  by  the  national  debt.  High  taxes  are 
neceiTary  to  fupport  a  great  public  debt;  and  a  large  fupplyof 
cafh  is  neceflary  to  fupport  high  taxes.  This  cafh  we  owe  to 
our  paper;  and,  in  proportion  to  our  paper,  muft  be  the  pro- 

dudtivenefs  of  our  taxes. King  William's  wars  drained  the 

Jcingdom  of  its  fpecie ;  this  funk  the  revenue,  and  diitreffed 
government.  In  1694  the  Bank  was  eftablifhed  ;  and  the 
kingdom  was  provided  with  a  fubftitute  for  fpecie.  The  taxei 
became  again  productive.  The  revenue  rofe  ;  and  government 

was  relieved. Ever  fince  that  period  our  paper    and  taxes 

have  been  encreafing  together,  and  fupporting  cr.e  another  ; 
and  one  reafen,  undoubtedly,  of  the  late  increafe  in  the  pro- 
duclivenefs  of  our  taxes  has  been  the  increafe  of  our  paper. 

Was  there  no  public  debt,  there  would  be  no  cccafion  for 
half  the  prefent  taxes.  Our  paper  circulation  might  be  reduced. 
The  balance  of  trade  would  turn  in  our  favour.  Specie  wouid 
flow  in  upon  us.  The  quantity  of  property  deuroyed  by  x 
failure  of  paper-credit  (fhould  it  in  fueh  circumftances  happen) 
would  he  140  millions  lefs;  and,  therefore,  the  fhock  attend- 
ing it  would  be  tolerable.  But,  in  the  prefent  ft  ate  or"  ihingp, 
whenever  any  calamity  or  panic  (hall  produce  fueh  a  failure, 
the  fhock  attending  it  will  be  intolerable. — May  Heaven  foon 
raife  up  for  us  fome  great  ftatefman  who  {hall  fee  thefo  things; 
and  enter  into  effectual  meafures,  if  not  now  too  late,  for 
extricating -and  preferving  us.  Public 

*  Their  debts  conhft  chit-fly  of  money  railed  by  aEnairies  os  livre, 
(hoi  t  annuities,  anticipations  c-f  Uxes  icr  fh©M  ;.  ~i»os,  Sec  D'.'np*  the 
**ncle  laft  war  they  added  to  their  perpetual  annuities  or.ty  12  millions, 
iterling,  according  to  Sir  James  Steuarfs  recount  ->  wiitreas  we  acidrd 
to  theie  annuities  near  60  millions.  Irt  confequence  therefore  ol  the 
nature  of  their  debts,  as  welj  as  of  the  msur'r-genienr  they  are  now  vC.ng 
for  haftening  the  reduction  of  them,  they  muft  in  a  few  years,  if  pea. « 
continues,  be  freed  from  moft  of  their  incumbrances  ;  while  w<*  pio- 
h?bl«  (it  no  evert  t  c<-mes  foon  that  v»iil  unkttrthea  &*  *t  c-jicc)  i**ii 
fentinus  with  th; n-  ail  upon  as. 


(     4^     ) 

Public  Banks  are3  undoubtedly,  attended  with  great  conve- 
niences. But  they  alio  do  great  harm;  and  if  their  emiffions 
are  not  reftrained  and  conducted  with  great  wifdom,  they  may 
prove  the  moft  pernicious  of  all  inftitutions ;  not  only,  by 
i 'ubftituting  fictitious  for  real  wealth  ;  by  increafing  luxury  y 
by  raifing  the  prices  of  provifions;  by  concealing  an  unfavor- 
able balance  of  trade;  and  by  rendering  a  kingdom  incapable 
©f  bearing  any  internal  tumults  or  external  attacks,  without, 
the  danger  of  a  dreadful  convulfion  :  But,  particularly,  by 
becoming  inftruments  in  the  hands  of  minifters  of  ftate  to  in- 
creafe  their  influence,  to  lefien  their  dependence  on  the  peo- 
ple, and  to  keep  up  a  delufive  fhew  of  public  profperity  when, 
perhaps,  ruin  may  be  near.  There  is,  in  truth,  nothing; 
that  a  government  may  not  do  with  fuch  a  mine  at  its  com- 
mand as  a  public  Bank,  while  it  can  maintain  its  credit;  nor, 
therefore,  is  there  any  thing  more  likely  to  be  improperly 
and  dangerously  ufed„— But  to  return  to  what  may  be 
more  applicable  to  our  ftate  at  prefent. 

Among  the  caufes  that  may  produce  a  fail ure'of  paper-credit, 
there  are  two  which  the  prefent  quarrel  with  America  calls  upon 
tis  particularly  to  confider.-*— The  firfr.  is,  "  An  unfavourable 
"  balance  of  trade."  This,  in  proportion  to  the  degree  in 
which  it  takes  place,  muft  turn  the  courfe  of  foreign  exchange 
againftus;  raife  the  price  of  bullion  ;  and  carry  off  our  fpecie. 
The  danger  to  which  this  would  expofe  us  is  obvious;  and  it 
has  been  much  increafed  by  the  new  coinage  of  the  gold  fpecie 
which  begun  in  1772.  Before  this  coinage,  the  greatefl  part 
of  our  gold  coin  being  light,  but  the  fame  fri  currency,  as  if  It 
had  been  heavy,  always'remained  in  the  kingdom.  But,  being 
now  full  weight,  whenever  a  wrong  balance  of  foreign  trade 
alters  the  courfe  of  exchange,  and  gold  in  coin  becomes  oflefs 
?alue  than  in  bullion  9  there  is  reafon  to  fear,  that  it  will  be 
melted  down  in  fuch  great  quantities,  and  exported  fo  fafr,  as 
in  a  little  time  to  leave  none  behind  jf    the  confequence  of 

which 
*  Mr.  Lowndes,   in  the  difpute  between  him  and  Mr.  Locke,  con- 
tended for  a  rsducYion  of  the  ftandard  ftlver.     One  of  his  reafons  was, 
that  it  would  render  the  filver  coin  more  commenfurate  to  the  wants  of 

the  nation ;  and  check  hazardous  paper-credit. Mr.  Con- 

nuiT,  Sir  Isaac  Newton's  fucceffor  in  the  mint,  has  propofed,  in 
clirecl  contradiction  to  the  laws  now  in  being,  that  all  the  bullion  im- 
ported into  the  kingdom  mould  be  carried  into  the  mint  to  be  coined ; 
and  only  coin  allowed  to  be  exported.  "  The  height,"  he  fays,  M  of 
"  paper- credit  is  the  ftrongeft  argument  for  trying  this?  and  e<very  other 

method 


(     47     ) 

which  mull  prove,  that  the  whole  fuperftru£ture  of  paper-credit, 
now  fupported  by.  it,  will  break  down. — The  only  remedy,  in 
fuch  circumftances,  is  an  increafe  of  coinage  at  the  mint.  But 
this  will  operate  too  flowly ;  and  by  raifing  the  price  of  bullion,' 
will  only  increafe  the  evil. — It  is  the  Bank  that  at  fuck  a  time 
mult  be  the  immediate  furierer :  For  it  is  from  thence  that  thofe 
who  want  coin  for  any  purpofe  will  always  draw  it. 

For  many  years  before  1772,  the  price  of  gold  in  bullion  had 
been,  from  2  to  3  or  4  per  cent,  higher  than  in  fin.  This 
was  a  temptation  to  melt  down  and  export  the  coin,  which  could 
not  be  reiiftcd.  Hence  arofc  a  demand  for  it  on  the  Bank  ; 
and,  confequently,  the  neceffity  of  purchaiing  bullion  at  a  lofs 
for  a  new  coinage.  But  the  more  coin  the  Bank  procured  in  this. 
way,  the  lower  its  price  became  in  comparifon  with  that  of 
bullion,  and  the  fafter  it  vanifhed  ;  and,  confequently,  the  more 
rieceflary  it   became  to  coin  again,  and  the  greater  lofs  fell    upon 

the  Bank. Had   things   continued  much  longer  in  this  train, 

the  confequences  might  have  proved  very  ferious.  I  am  by  no 
means  ful?iciently  informed  to  be  able  to  affign  the  caufes 
which  produced  the  change  that  happened  in  1772.  But,  with- 
out doubt,  the  ftate  of  things  that  took  place  before  that  year 
muft  be  expecled  to  return.  The  flu&uatioas  of  trade,  in  its. 
belt  ftate,  render  this  unavoidable.  £ut  the  conteft  with  ©ur 
Colonies  has  a  tendency  to  bring  it  on  foon,  and  to  encrcafe  un- 
fpeakably  the  cW^refs  attending  it. 

All  know  that  the  balance  of  trade  uith  them  is  greatly  in  our 
favour  ;  f  and  that  this  balance  is  paid  partly  by  direct  remit- 
tances of  bullion  ;  and  partly  by  circuitous  remittances  through 
Spain,  Portugal,  Italy,  &c.  which  diminish  the  balance  againiV 
us  with  thefe  countries. — ^-During  the  Uil  year  they  have  been 

employed' 

*i  method  that  is  likely  to  increafe  the  coinage.  For  whilft  psper-cre-^ 
"  ditdoes  in  a  great  mealure  the  bufinefs  of  money  at  home,  Merchants. 
*c  and  Bankers  are  not  under  a  neceiHty,  as  they  were  formerly,  of 
"  coining  a  quantity  of  fpecie  for  their  home  trade  j'and  as  paper-cre-, 
'!  dit  brings  money  to  the. Merchants  to  be  exported,  the  money  may, 
"  go  away  infenfibly,  and  not  ee  hissed  till  it  be  too  late  •/ 
t(  And  where  paper-credit  is  large  and  increafing,  if  the  money  be  ex-, 
n  parted  and  the  coinage  decieafe,  that  credit  may  sink  at  once 
".for  want  of  a  proportionable  quantity  of  Specify  which  alone  can. 
•*  fupport  it  in  a  time  of  diftrefs."  See  Mr.  Condiut'%  Obfertations  om 
the  ftate  of  our  Gold  and  Silver  Coios  in  1730,  page  36  to  46. 

■f  According  to  the  accounts  of  the  exports  to,  and  imports  from  the 
N^rth-American  Colonies,  hid  before  Pari i.i men r  ;  the  balance  ir  our, 
favour  appears  to  have  been,  for  1 1  years  b«fs>re  1774,  Htar  a  million 
ami  a  Laif  armuallv. 


(     48     ) 

employed  in  paying  their  debts,  without  adding  to  then*  ;  and 
their  exportation  and  remittances  for  that  purpofc  have  contri- 
buted to  render  the  general  balance  of  trade  more  favourable  td 
u?,  and,  alfo,  (in  conjunction  with  the  late  operations  of  the 
Bank)  to  keep  up  our  funds.  Thsfe  remittances  are  now  ceafed  ; 
and  a  year  or  two  will  determine,  if  this  conteft  goes  on,  how  far 
we  can  fuftain  fuch  a  lofs  without  fuffering  the  confequences  I 
have  defcribed 

The  fecond  event,  ruinous  to  our  paper-circulation,  which 
may  arife  from  our  rupture  with  America,  is  a  deficiency  in  the 
revenue.  As  a  failure  of  our  paper  would  deftroy  the  revenue, 
fo  a  failure  of  the  revenue,  or  any  considerable  diminution  of  it, 
would  deitroy  our  paper.  The  Bank  is  the  fupport  of  our 
paper;  and  the  fupport  of  the  Bank:  is  the  credit  of  govern- 
ment. Its  principal  fecUrities  are  a  capital  of  near  eleven  mil- 
lions lent  to  government ;  and  money  continually  advanced  to 
*  vaft  amount  on  the  Land-tax,  Sinking-fund,  Exchequer-bills, 
Navy-Bills,  &c.  Should,  therefore,  deficiences  in  the  revenue 
bring  government  under  any  difficulties,  all  thefe  fecurities 
would  lofe  their  value,  and   (he   Bank  and  Government,   and  all 

private  and  public  credit,  would  fall  together.- Let  any 

©ne  here  imagine,  what  would  probacy  follow,  were  it  but  fuf- 
peeled  by  the  public  in  general,  that  the  taxes  were  fo  fallen,  as 
flot  to  pruduce  enough  to  pay  the  interefl  of  the  public  debts, 
befide?  bearing  the  ordinary  expences  of  the  nation  ;  and  that,  in 
Order  to  fuppiy  the  deficiency  and  to  hide  the  calamity,  it  had 
been  necefia'y  in  any  one  year,  to  anticipate  the  taxes,  and  to 
borrow  of  the  Bank.— ^In  fuch  circumftances  I  can  fcarcely  doubt, 
but  an  alarm  would  fpread  of  the  mod  dangerous  tendency. — 
The  next  foreign  war,  fhould  it  prove  half  m  expenfive  ai  the 
laft,  will  probably  occanon  fuch  a  deficiency,  and  bring  our  af- 
fairs to  that  crifis  towards  which  they  have  been  long  tending 

But  the  war  with  America  has  a  greater  tendency  to  do  this ;  and 
the  reafon  is,  that  it  affecls  our  refources  more  ;  and  is  attended 
more  with  the  danger  of  internal  difturbances. 

Some  have  made  the  proportion  of  our  trade  depending  on 
North- America  to  be  nearly  one  half.  A  moderate  computa- 
tion makes  it  a  third,  f  Let  it,  ho\vever,  be  fuppofed  to  be 
only  a  Fourth.  I  will  venture  to  fay,  this  is  a  proportion  of 
our  foreign   trade,     the  lofs  of  which,    when  it  comes  to  be  felt, 

will  be  found  infupportable. In  the  article  of  Tobacct 

alone 

f  See  the  f.ihftance  of  the  EviJence  on  the  Petition  prefcnteii  hy 
fhe  Weft-India  t'hnters  and  Merchants  to  the  Houle  ol  Co-nmons,  a* 
it  was  iitfreJated  ta  \i\z  &\k,  uad  lamm-d  up  Oy  Mr.  Glovmr. 


(     49     ) 

alone  it  will  caufe  a  deduction  from  the  Cufio?ns  of  at  leaf! 
300,000 1.  per  annum,  f  including  the  duties  paid  on  foreign 
commodities  purchased  by  the  exportation  of  tobacco.  Let 
the  whole  deduction  from  the  revenue  be  mppofed  to  be  only 
half  a  million.  This  alone  is  more  than  the  kingdom  can  at 
prefent  bear,  without  having  recourfe  to  additional  taxes,  in 
order  to  defray  the  common  and  necefTary  expences  of  peace. 
But  to  this  mull  be  added  a  deduction  from  the  produce  of  the 
Excifes,  in  confequence  of  the  increafe  of  the  poor,  of  the  dif- 
ficulties of  our  merchants  and  manafacturers,  of  lefs  national 
wrealth,  and  a  retrenchment  of  luxury.  There  is  no  poffibility 
of  knowing  to  what  thefe  deductions  may  amount.  When  the 
evils  producing  them  begin,  they  will  proceed  rapidly  ;  and  they 
may  end  in  a  general  wreck  before  we  are  aware  of  any  danger. 
In  order  to  give  a  clearer  view  of  this  fubject,  I  will,  in  an 
Appendix,  ftate  particulary  the  national  expenditure  and  in- 
come for  ten  years,  from  1 764  to  1 774.  From  that  account 
it  will  appear,  that  the  money  drawn  every  year  from  the 
public  by  the  taxes,  falls  but  little  fhortofa  fum  equal  to  the 
whole  fpecie  of  the  kingdom  ;  and  that,  notwithstanding  the 
late  increafe  in  the  produ&ivenefs  of  the  taxes,  the  whole  fur- 
plus  of  the  national  income  has  not  exceeded  320,000!.  per 
annum.  This  is  a  furplus  fo  inconfiderabie  as  to  be  fcarcely 
fufficient  to  guard  againft  the  deficiencies  arifing  from  the 
common  fluctuations  of  foreign  trade,  and  of  home  confump- 
tion.     It  is  nothing  when  confidered  as  the  only  fund  we 

have  for  paying  off  a  debt  o£  near  140  millions. Had  we 

continued  in  a  rtate  of  profound  peace,  it  could  not  have  ad- 
mitted of  any  diminution.  What  then  muft  follow,  when 
one  of  the  molt  profitable  branches  of  our  trade  is  deftroyed  ; 
when  a  third  of  the  empire  is  loft;  when  an  addition  of 
many  millions  is  made  to  the  public  debt ;  and  when,  at  the 
fame  time,  perhaps,  fome  millions  are  taken  away  from  the 
revenue  ?    I   fhudder  at  the   profpect. A    kingdom,  on 

AN  EDGE  SO  PERILOUS,  SHOULD  THINK  OF  NOTHING 
BUT    A  RETREAT. 

G  SECT. 

f  The  annual  averag«  of  the  payments  into  the  Exchequer,  on 
account  of  the  duties  on  tobacco,  was  for  five  )ears,  from  1770  to 
1774,119,117!.  exclufive  of  the  payments  from  Scotland. —  Near 
one  halt  of  the  tobacco  trade  is  carried  on  from  Scotland -y  and 
above  four  fifths  of  the  tobacco  imported  is  afterwards  exported 
to  France  Germany  and  other  countries.  From  France  alone  it 
brings  annually  into  the  Kingdom,  I  am  informed,  about 
150,0001.  in  money. 
In  1775,  being,  alas!  the  parting  ye»rf  the  duties  on  tobacco  in 

England  brought  into  the  Exchequer  no  kfe  a  fum  than 

29$,20Z1, 


(     5°     ) 

SECT.     IV. 

Of  (be  Honour  cf  the  Nation^  as  effected  by  the  Wan 
with  America. 

nE  cf  the  pleas  for   continuing  the  context  with  America 
is,. "That  our  honour  is  engaged;  and  that  we  cannot 
"  recede  without  the  moil  humiliating  conceflions." 

With  reipedl  to  this,  it  is  proper  to  bbferve,  that  a  diftinc- 
tion  ihould  be  made  between  the  nation  and  its  rulers.     It  is 
melancholy  that  there  mould  be  ever  any  reafon  for  making 
fuch  a  diifcin&ion.     A  government  is,  or  ought  to  be,  nothing 
but  an  inilitution  for  collecting  and  for  carrying  into  execu- 
tion the  will  of  the  people.     But  Co  far  is  this  from  being  in 
general   the  fact,  that  the  meafures  of  government,   and  the 
ienfe  of  the  people,   are  fometimes  in  direc~l  oppofiticn  to  one 
another  ;  'nor  does  it  often  happen  that  any  certain  conclufion 
can  be  drawn   from  the  one  to  the  other,— I  will  not  pretend 
to  determine,  whether,  in  the  prefent  inflance,  the  dishonour 
attending  a  retreat  would  belong  to  the  nation  at  large,  or  only 
to   the  perfons    in  power    who  guide  its   affairs.     Let   it    be 
granted,  though,  probably  far  from  true,  that  the  majority  of 
the  kingdom  favour  the  prefent  meafures.     No  good  argument 
could  be  drawn  from    hence  againfl  receding.     The  difgrace 
to  which  a  kingdom   muft  fubmit  by  making  concefSons,  is 
nothing  to -that  of  being  the  aggrefTors  in  an  unrighteous  quar- 
rel ;   and  dignity,   in  fuch  circumftances,  confifts  in  retracting 
freely,  fpeedily,  and  msgnanimouily.— For,  (to  adopt,  on  this 
cccafion,   words  which  I   have  heard  applied  to  this  very  pur- 
pofe,  in  a  great  aflembly,  by  a  peer  to  whom  this  kingdom  has 
often    looked   as  its  deliverer,  and  whofe  ill  ftate  of  health  at 
this  awful  moment  of  public  danger,  every  friend  to  Britain 
muft  deplore)  to  adopt,  I  fay,  the  words  of  this  great  man— 
"  Rectitude    is    dignity.       Oppression     only     is 
1 '  meanness;  and  justice,  honour." 

I  will  add,  that  Prudence,  no  lefs  than  Honour,  requires 
us  to  retraft.  For  the  time  may  come  when,  if  it  is  not  done 
voluntarily,  we  may  be  obliged  to  do  it ;  and  find  curfelves  un- 
der a  ncceiiity  of  granting  that  to  our  diilrefTes,  which  we  now 
deny  to  equity  and  humanity,  and  the  prayers  of  America.  1  h« 
pcfiibility  of  this  appears  plainly  from  the  preceding  pages : 
and  (hould  it  happen,  it  will  bring  upon  us  difgrace  indeed,  dif- 
grace greater  than  the  worft  rancour  can  wiih  to  fee  accumif 

on 


(    ?!    ) 

on  a  kingdom  already  too  much  dishonoured.-  -Let  the  reader 
think  here  what  we  are  doing A  nation,  once  the  protec- 
tor of  Liberty  in  diftant  countries,  and  the  fcourge  of  tyranny, 
changed  into  an  enemy  to  Liberty,  and  engaged  in  endeavour- 
ing to  reduce  to  fervitude  its  own  brethren.— A  great  and 
enlightened  nation,  not  content  with  a  controuling  power 
over  millions  of  people  which  gave  it  every  reafonable  advan- 
tage, infilling  upon  fuch  a  fupremacy  over  them  as  would 
leave  them  nothing  they  could  call  their  own,  and  carrying 
defolation  and  death  among  them  for  difputing  it.— What  can 
be  more  ignominious  ?—  How  have  we  felt  for  the  brave  Cer- 
Jicam,  in  their  ftruggle  with  the  Genoefr,  and  afterwards  with 
the  Breach  government }  Did  Genoa  or  France  want  mere 
than  an  abfolute  command  over  their  property  and  lep-iilations  ; 

or  the  power  of  binding   them   in   all  cafes  whatfoever  ? 

The  Cvrjtcans  had  been  fabject  to  the  Gcnoefe  ;  but  finding  it 
difficult  to  keep  them  in  fubjedion,  they  ceded  them  to  the 
French.— W\  iuch  ceifions  of  one  people  to  another  are  dif- 
graceful  to  human  nature,     But  if  our  claims  are  juft,  may  not 

we  alfo,  if  we  pleafe,  cede  the  Colonies  to  France  I There 

is,  in  truth,  no  other  difference  between  thefe  two  cafes  than 
that  the  Corficans  were  not  defended  from  the  people  who 
governed  them,  but  that  the  Americans  are. 

There  are  fome  who  feem  to  be  fenfible,  that  the  authority 
of  one  country  over  another,  cannot  be  diitinguifhed  from  the 
fervitude  of  one  country  to  another  ;  and  that  unlefs  different 
communities,  as  well  as  different  parts  of  the  fame  community, 
are  united  by  an  equal  representation,  ail  fuch  authority  is 
inconfiitent  with  the  principles  of  Civil  Liberty.  But  they 
except  the  cafe  of  the  Ccionies  and  Great-Britain  ;  becaiife 
the  Colonies  are  communities  which  branched  forth  from, 
and  which  therefore,  as  diey  think,  belong  to  Britain.  Had 
the  Colonies  been  communities  of  foreigners,  over  whom  we 
wanted  to  acquire  dominion,  or  even  to  extend  a  dominion 
before  acquired,  they  are  ready  to  admit  that  their  refinance 
would  have  been  juii.— In  my  opinion,  this  is  the  fame  with 
faying,  that  the  Colonies  ought  to  be  worfe  off  than  the  reir  of 
mankind,  becaufe  they  are  our  own  Brethren. 

Again.     The  Uniced  Provinces  of  Holland  were  once  fubject 

to  the   Spanijb  monarchy ;   but,  provoked  by  the  violation  of 

their   charters ;    by   levies  of  money,    without  their   content; 

by  the  introduction  of  Spanifh  troops  among  them  ;  by  innova- 

G  2  tkms 


(     5*     ) 

cf  government ;  and  the  rejection 
of  their  petitions,  they  were  driven  to  that  refinance  which 
we  and  all  the  world  have  ever  fince  admired  ;  and  which 
has  given  birth  to  one  of  the  greateft  and  happier!:  Republics 

that  ever  exifted. Let  any  one  read  alfo  the  hiilory  of  the 

war  which  the  Athenians  from  a  thirit  of  Empire,  made  on 
the  Syracufans  in  Cicify,  a  people  derived  from  the  fame  origin 
with  them  ;  and  let  him,  if  he  can,  avoid  rejoiciug  in  die 
defeat  of  the  Athenians. 

Let  him,  likewife,  read  the  account  of  the  fecial  war  among 
the  Romans.  The  allied  ilates  of  Italy  had  fought  the  battles 
of  Rcme,  and  contributed  by  their  valour  and  treafure  to  its 
conquelts  and  grandeur.  They  claimed,  therefore,  the  rights 
of  Roman  citizens,  and  a  mare  with  them  in  legiflaticn.  The 
Romans,  difdaining  to  make  thofe  their  fe/Ioiv-Citizens,  whom 
they  had  always  looked  upon  as  their  fubjecls,  would  not 
comply  ;  and  a  war  followed,  which  ended  in  the  ruin  of  the 
Roman  Republic.  The  feelings  of  every  Briton  in  this  cafe 
mull  force  him  to  approve  the  condudl  of  the  Allies,  and  to 
condemn  the  proud  and  ungrateful  Romans. 

But  not  only  is  the  prefent  conteil  with  America  thus  dis- 
graceful to  us,  becaufe  inconfiftent  with  our  own  feelings  in 
fimilar  cafes ;  but  alfo  becaufe  condemned  by  our  own  practice 
in  former  times.  The  Colonies  are  perfuaded  that  they  are 
fighting  for  Liberty.  We  fee  them  facrificing  to  this  perfua- 
fion  every  private  advantage.  If  miftaken,  and  though  guilty 
of  irregularities,  they  mould  be  pardoned  by  a  people  whole 
anceftors  have  given  them  fo  many  examples  cf  fimilar  conduct. 
England  mould  venerate  the  attachment  to  Liberty  amidft 
all  its  exceffes ;  and,  inflead  of  indignation  or  fcorn,  it  would 
be   moil  becoming  them,  in   the  prefent  inilance,  to  declare 

their   applaufe,   and  to  fay  to  the  Colonies "  We  e: 

"  your  miftakes.  We  admire  your  fpirit.  It  is  the  (pint 
"  that  has  more  than  once  laved  our/elves.  We  afpire  to  no 
"  dominion  over  you.  We  underlland  the  rights  cf  men  too 
"  well  to  think  of  taking  from  you  the  incflimable  privileges 
"  of  governing  yourfelves ;  and,  inllead  of  employing  our 
*'  power  for  any  fuch  purpoie,  we  offer  it  to  you  as  a  friendly 
**  and  guardian  power,  to  be  a  mediator  in  your  quarrels ;  a 
"  protection  againft  your  enemies;  and  an  aid  to  you  in 
"  eftablifhing  a  plan  of  Liberty  that  mall  make  you  g 
"  and  happy.  In  return,  we  afk  nothing  but  your  gratitude 
*«  and  your  commerce," 

This 


(     53     ) 

This  would  be  a  language  worthy  of  a  brave  and  enlightened 
nation.  But  alas  !  it  often  happens  in  the  Political  J^'orM  a* 
it  does  in  Religion,  that  the  people  who  cry  cut  molt  vehemently 
for  Liberty  to  theinfelves  are  the  moil  unwilling  to  grant  it  to 
others. 

One  of  the  more  violent  enemies  of  the  Colonies  has  pro* 

nounced  them  "all  Mr.  Locke's  difciples.." Glorious  Litift! 

How  fhameful   is  it  to  make  war  againft  them   for  that 

reafon  ? 

But  farther.  This  war  is  difgraceful  on  account  of  the 
perfuafion  which  led  to  it,  and  under  which  it  has  been  under- 
taken. The  general  cry  was  laft  winter,  that  the  people  of 
New-England  were  a  body  of  cowards,  who  would  at  cn;e 
he  tumbled  into  fubmiiuon  by  a  hoftile  look  from  our  troops. 
In  this  light  were  they  held  up  to  the  public  derificn  in  both 
Houfes  of  Parliament ;  and  it  was  this  peHuafion  that,  prob- 
ably, induced  a  nobleman  of  the  firft  weight  in  the  ftate  to 
recommend,  at  the  palling  of  the  Boflcn  Pert  Bill,  coercive 
meafures  ;  hinting  at  the  fame  time,  that  the  appearance  of 
Hoftilities  would  be  fufficient,  and  that  all  would  be  loon  over, 

sine  clade. Indeed   no     one  can  doubt,  but  that  had  it 

been  believed  fome  time  ago,  the  people  of  America  were 
brave,  more  care  would  have  been  taken  not  to  pro  voice  diem. 

Again.     The  manner  in  which  this  war  lias  been  hitherto 

conducted,  renders  it  ftill  more  difgraceful. Ergliih  valour 

being  thought  infufficient  to  fubdue  the  Colonies,  the  law  and 
religion  of  France  were  efrablifiied  in  Canada,  en  purpofe  to 
obtain  the  power  of  bringing  upon  them  from  thence  an  army 
of  French  Papijts.  The  wild  Indians  and  their  own  Haves  have 
been  mitigated  to  attack  then: ;  and  attempts  have  been  made 

to  gain   the    airhlance  of  a  Large  body  of  Ruffians. With 

like  views,  German  troops  have  been  hired  ;  and  the  defence 
of  our  Forts- and  Garrifons  trurled  in  their  hands. 

Thefe  are  meafures  which  need  no  comment.  The  laft  of 
them,  in  particular,  having  been  carried  into  exeution  with- 
out the  conicnt  of  Parliament,  threatens  us  with  immitic  : 
danger  ;  and  mews  that  we  are  in  the  way  to  lofe  even  the 
Forms  of  the  conilitution— If,  indeed,  our  minifters  can,  at  any 
time,  without  leave,  not  only  fend  away  the  national  troops, 
but  introduce  foreign  troops  in  their  room,  we  lie  entirely  at 
mercy  ;  ana  we  have  every  thing  to  dread. 


(     54    ) 

SECT.     V. 

Of  the  Probability  of  Succeeding  in   the  War  with 
America. 

LE  T  us  next  confider  hew  far  there  is  a  poffibility  of  fuc- 
ceeding  in  the  prefent  war. 
Our  own  people,  being  unwilling  to  enlift,  and  the  attempts 
to  procure  armies  of  Ruffians,  Indians  and  Canadians,  having 
miicarried  ;  the  utincft  force  we  can  employ,  including  fo- 
reigners, does  not  exceed,  if  I  am  rightly  informed,  30,000 
efreoive  men.  Let  it,  however,  be  called  40,000.  This  is 
the  force  that  is  to  conquer  half  a  million  at  leaf}  *  of  deter- 
mined men  fighting  on  their  own  ground,  within  light  of  their 
houfes  and  families,  and  for  that  facred  bleliing  of  Liberty, with- 
out which  man  is  a  beaft,  and  government  a  curfe.  All 
hiftory  proves*  that,  in  (uch  a  fituation,  a  handful  is  a  match 
for  millions. 

In  the  Netherlands  a  few  frates  thus  circumftanced ,  withftcod, 
for  thirty  years,  the  whole  force  of  the  Spanifh  monarchy,  when 
at  its  zenith;  and  at  lail  humbled  its  pride,  and  emancipated 
themselves  from  its  tyranny,— The  citizens  of  Syracus  alio, 
thus  circumftanced,  withftopd  the  whole  power  of  the  Athenians 

and  almoft  ruined  them. The  fame  happened  in  the  conteft 

between  the  houfe  of  Auftria,  and  the  cantons  \  of  Switzerland. 
—.-There  is  in  this  caule  an  infinite  difference  between  attack- 
ing and  being  attacked;  between  fighting  to  dcjlrcy,  and 
lighting  to  prfer-ue,  or  acquire  Liberty. Were  we,  there- 
fore, capable  of  employing  a  land  force  againft  America  equal 
to  its  own,  there  would  be  little  probability  of  fiicceis.  But  to 
think  of  conquering  that  whole  continent  with  30,000  or 
40,000  men  to  be  tranfported  acrofs  the  Atlantic,  and  fed  from 

hence,   and  incapable  of  being  recruited  after  any  defeat 

This  is  indeed  a  foliy  io  great,  that  language  does  not  afford 
a  name  for  it. 

With  refpecl  to  our  naval  force,  could  it  fail  at  land  as  it 
does  at    fea,    much   might    be   done  with  it ;  but   as  that  is 

impo" 
*  A  quarter   of  the  inhabitants  of  every   country  are  fighting 

men. If,  therefore,  the  Colonies  coiiil  oniy  of  two  mil  Hon  s 

of  inhabitants,  the  number  of  fighting  men  in  them  will  behalf 

a  million, 
f  See  the  appendix  to  Dr.  Zably's   Sermon,    preacfeed    at    the 

opening  of  the  Provincial  Congreft  ot  Georgia, 


(     55     ) 

impoffible,  tittle,  or  nothing  can  be  dene  Vvlth  it,  which  will 
not  hurt  our/elves  more  than  the  Ceknifts.-— Such  of  their 
maritime  towns  as  they  cannot  guard  againft  our  fleets,  and 
have  not  been  already  deftroyed,  they  are  determined  either  to 
give  up  to  our  refentment,  or*  deitroy  themfelves :  The  con- 
sequence of  which  will  be,  that  thefe  towns  will  be  rebuilt  in 
(afcr  fituations  ;  and  that  we  mall  locfe  feme  of  the  principal 

pledges  by  which  we  have  hitherto  held  them  in  fubjeclion, 

As    to    their  trade  ;  having  all  the   neceiTaries   and  the  chief 
conveniencies  of  life  within   themfelves,  they  have  no  depend- 
ence upon  it ;    and   the   lofs  of  it  will  do  them  unfpeakable 
good,  by  preferring  them   from    the  evils  cf  luxury  and  the 
temptations  of  wealth  ;  and    keeping   them   in    that   ftate  of 
virtuous  fimplicity  which   is  the  greateft   happinefs.     I  know 
that  I  am  now  {peaking  the  fenfe  of  fome  of  the  wifeft  men  in 
America.     It  has  been  long  their  wifh  that  Britain  would  ihut 
up  all  their  ports.     They  will  rejoice,  particulary,  in   the  laft 
retraining  a£k.  It  might  have  happened,  that  the  people  would 
have  grown  weary  of  their  agreements  not  to  export,  or  import. 
But  this  ac~r.  will  oblige  them  to  keep  thefe  agreements ;  and 
confirm  their  unanimity  and  zeal.     It  will  alio  furnifh  them 
with  a  reafon  for  connfeating  the  eftates  of  all  her  friends  of 
our  government  among  them,  and  for  employing  their  failors, 
who  would  have  been  otherwiie  idle,  in  making  reprifals  on 
Briti.fh  property.     Their   fiiips    before    nfelefs    and    ctenfirting 
of  many  hundreds,  will  be  turned  into  Ihips  of  war ;  and  all 
that  attention,  which  they   have   hitherto    confined  to  trade, 
wil]  be  employed  in  fitiing  out  a  naval  force  for  their  own 
defence  ;  and  thus  the  way  will  be  prepared  for  their  becoming, 
much  iboner  than   they   would  otherwiie  have   been,  a  great 
maritime  power.     This  act.  of  parliament,  therefore,  crowns 
the  folly  of  all  our  late  meafures. — None  who  know  me,  can 
believe  me  to  be  difpofed  to  fuperftition.     Perhaps,  however, 
I  am  not,  in  the  pre  fen  t   inftance,  free   from  this  weaknefs, 

1  fancy  I  fee  in  thefe  meafures  femething  that  cannot  be 

accounted  for  merely  by  human  ignorance.  I  am  inclined 
to  think,  that  the  hand  of  Providence  is  in  them  working  to 
bring  about  fome  great  ends, -----But  thb  leads  me  to  One  con- 
fideration  more,  which  I  cannot  heip  offering  to  the  public, 
and  which  appears  to  me  in  the  higheldt  decree  important. 

In 
■:  New-York  has  been  long  deferred  by  the  greateit  part  ofthe 
inhabitants  5  and  thzy  are  determined  to  burn  it  themfelves, 
r^i^er  than  fuffer  us  to  burn  it 


(     5^     ) 

In  this  hour  of  tremendous  danger,  it  would  become  us  to 
turn  our  thoughts  to  Heaven.  This  is  what  our  brethren  in 
the  Colonics  are  doing.  From  one  end  of  North  America  to 
the  other,  they  are  fasting  and  praying.  But  what  are 
we   doing   ?— Shoking   thought !    we   are   ridiculing  them  as 

Fanatics,  and  fcoffing  at  religion. We  are  running  wild 

after  pleafure,  and  forgetting  every  thing  ferious  and  decent 
&i  Majquerades.——-We  are  gambling  in  gaming  hoijfes  ;  traf- 
ficking  for  Boroughs ;  perjuring  ourielves   at    hitcl'oas    ;  and 

felling  ourielves  for  places. Which  fide  then  is  Providence 

likely  to  favour  ? 

In  America  we  fee  a  number  of  rifing  Hates  in  the  vigour  of 
youth,  infpired  by  the  nobleft  of  all  pailions,  thepahion  for 

being  free  ;  and  animated  by    piety. Here   we    lee  an  old 

ilate,  great  indeed,  but  inflated  and  irreligious  :  enervated  by 
luxury ;  encumbered  with   debts  j    and  hanging  by  a  thread. 

Can   any  one  lock  without  pain  to  the  ifiue  ?  May  we 

not  expect  calamities  that  fhall  recover  to  reflexion  (perhaps 
to  devotion)  our  Libertines  and  Aiheifls  ? 

Is  our  cauie  fuch  as  gives  us  reafon  to  afk  God  to  blefs  it  r 

—Can  we  in  the  face  of  heaven  declare,  "that  we  are  not 

"  the  aggre^crs  in  this  war;  and  that  we  mean  by  it,  not  to 
"  acquire  Or  even  preferve  dominion  for  its  own  fake  ;  not 
"  conquest,  or  empire,  or  the  gratification  of  refentment ; 
"  but  folely  to  deliver  ourielves  from  oppreiTicn  ;  to  gain  re- 
"  paration  for  injury  ;  and    to    defend  curfelves  againiT.  men 

"    who   would   plunder    or    kill    us?" Remember,  reader, 

whoever  thou  art,  that  there  are  no  other  jull  caufes  of  war  ; 
and  that  blood  fpilied,  with  any  other  views,  mull  feme  time 

or  other  be  accounted  for. But  not  to  expofe  myfelf  by 

faying  more  in  this  way,  I  will  now    beg  leave  to  recapitulate 
fome  cf  the  arguments  I  have  ufed  ;  and  to  deliver  the  feeling 
of  my  heart  in  a  brief,  but    earneft  addrefs  to  my  country- 
men. 

I  am  hearing  it  continually  urged "  Are  they  not  our 

fubjecls." —The  plain  anlvver  is,  they  are  not  your  fub- 

jecls.  The  people  of  America  are  no  more  the  fubjects  of  the 
people  of  Britain,  than  the  people  of '  Torkjhire  are  the  fubjecls 
of  the  people  of  Middle/ex.     They  are  your  Fellow-flub] eels. 

'*  But  nve  are  taxed  ;  and  why  fhouid  not  they  be  taxed?" 
Tou  are  taxed  by  yourfelves.  They  infill  on  the  fame  pri- 
vilege.—— They  are  taxed  to  fuppcrt  their  own  governments  ; 

and 


(    57    ) 

and  they  help  alfo  to  pay  your  taxes  by  purchafing  your  manu- 
factures, and  giving  you  a  monopoly  of  their  trade.  Mull 
they  maintain  t-ivo  governments  ?  Mull  they  fubmit  to  be  triple 
taxed?-— Has  your  moderation,  in  taxing  yourieives,  beenfuch  as 
encourages  them  to  trull  you  with  the  power  of  taxing  them  ? 
"  But   they  will  not  obey  the  Parliament  and  the  Laws" 

Say  rather,    they  will  not  obey  your  parliament  and  your 

laws .     Their  reafon  is :    They  have  no  voice  in  your  parlia- 
liament.     They  have  no  fhare  in   making  *   your  laws, — - 

"  Neither  have  mojl  of  us." Then  you  io  far  want  Liberty; 

and  your  language  is,  "  We  are  not  free,  Why  will  they  be 

free?" But  many  of  you  have  a  voice  in  parliament:  None 

of  them  have.   All  your  freehold  land  is  reprefented :  But  not 
a  foot  of  their  land  is  repreiented ;    At  worft,  therefore,  you 

can   be    only    enflaved  partially. They  would  be   enllaved 

totally. They  are  governed  by  parliaments  chofen  by  them- 

felves,  and  by  iegiflatures  fimiiar  to  yours.  Why  will  you 
diilurb  them  in  the  enjoyment  of  a  bleiiing  fo  invaluable  ?  Is 
it  reafonable  to  infift,  that  your  difcretion  alone  ihall  be  their 
law  ;  that  they  ihall  have  no  conlHtutions  of  government,  ex- 
cept fuch  as  your  parliament  fhali  be  pleafed  to  leave  them  ?— 
What  is  your  parliament  ?— Powerful  indeed  and  refpeclable : 
But  is  there  not  a  growing  intercourie  between  it  and  the  court? 
Does  it  awe  mimiters  of  ftate  as  it  once  did  ?  Infteaa  of  con^ 
tending  for  a  controuling  power  over  the  governments  of  Ame- 
rica, mould  you  not  think  more  of  watching  and  reforming 
your  own  ? — Suppofe  the  worit.  Suppofe,  in  oppofition  to  all 
their  own  declarations,  that  the  Coioniits  are  now  aiming  at 
H  independence. 

*  I  have  no  other  notion  or  flivery,  but  being  bourn  J  by  a  1  w 
"  to  which  I  do  not  confent."  See  the  cafe  ot  Ireland^  being 
bound  by  acts  of  parliament  in  England,  ftated  by  Willi  m  Mo- 
Jyneux,  Efqj  Dublin.— ^-In  arguing  againft  the  authority  of 
Communities,  and  ail  people  not  incorporated,  over  oj:e 
another,  I  have  confined  my  views  to  taxation  and  internal 
legiflation.  Mr.  Molyneux  carried  his  views  much  farther  j 
and  denied  the.  right  of  England  to  make  any  laws  even  to  re- 
gulate the  trade  of  Ireland.  He  was  the  intimate  friend  of 
Mr.  Locke}  and  writ  his  book  in  1698,  foon  after  the  publica- 
tion of  Mr.  Locke's  Treatife  on  Government. 
What  I  have  laid  in  Part  ift.  Sect.  3d,  of  fubjefting  a  number  of 
ftates  into  a  general  council  representing  them  all,  I  iuppofe 
every  one  mutt  confider  as  entirely  theoretical  j  and  not  a  pro- 
pofal  of  any  thing  I  wifh  may  take  place  under  the  Britifh 
Empire, 


C     S8     ) 

independence.—4 1  If  they  can  fubfift  without  you  ;"  is  it  to  be 
Wondered  at  ?  Did  there  ever  exift  a  community,  or  even  an  in- 
diwidua/,  that  would  not  do  the  fame  r — *'  If  they  cannot  fub- 
fift without  you  ;"  let  them  alone.  They  will  foon  come  back 
— -"  If  you  cannot  fubfift  without  them  ;"  reclaim  them  by  * 
kindnefs ;  engage  them  by  moderation  and  equity.  It  is 
madnefs  to  refolve  to  butcher  them.  This  will  make  them 
deteft  and  avoid  you  forever.  Freemen  are  not  to  be  governed  by 
force;  or  dragooned  into  compliance.  If  capable  of  bearing  to 
be  fo  treated,  it  is  a  diigrace  to  be  connected  with  them. 

"If  they  can  fubfift  without  you;  and  alfo you  without  them," 
the  attempt  to  fubjugate  them  by  confkating  their  effects, 
burning  their  towns,  and  ravaging  their  territories,  is  a  wan- 
ton exertion  of  cruel  ambition,  which  however  common  it  has 
been  among  mankind,  delerves  to  be  called  by  harder  names 
than  I  chuie  to  apply  to  it.— Suppofe  fuch  an  attempt  was  to 
be  fucceeded  :  Would  it  not  be  a  fatal  preparation  for  fubdu- 
ing  yourfelves  ?  Would  not  the  difpofal  of  American  places, 
and  the  diftribution  of  an  American  revenue,  render  that  in- 
fluence of  the  crown  irrefiftibie,  which  has  already  ftabbed 
your  liberties  ? 

Turn  your  eyes  to  India :  There  more  has  been  done  than  is 
now  attempted  in  America.  There  Englishmen,  actuated 
by  the  love  of  plunder  and  the  fpirit  of  conqueft,  have  depo- 
pulated whole  kingdoms,    and   ruined   millions    of  innocent 

people  by  the  moil  infamous  oppreftion  and  rapacity. The 

juftice  of  the  nation  has  ilept  over  thefe  enormities.  Will  the 
juftice  of  heaven  ileep  ?  Are  we  not  now  execrated  on  both 
fides  of  the  globe.  With 

*  fcom:  perions,  convinced  of  the  fol'y  as  wtll  as  barbariy  of  at- 
tempting to  keep  the  Colonies  by  fHughfering  them,  have  very 
humanely  propofed  giving  them  up.  But  the  h  gheft  autho- 
rity has  informed  us,  ^itb  great  reafon,  "That  trey  are  too 
"  important  to  be  given  up."— Di.  Tucker  has  infixed  on 
the  depopulation,  produced  by  migrations  from  this  country  to 
the  Colonies,  as  a  reafon  for  this  meaf'ure.  But,  un'efs  the  king- 
dom is  made  a  prifon  to  its  inhabitants,  thefe  migrations  cannot 
be  prevented  ;  nor  do  I  think  that  they  have  any  great  tendency 
to  produce  depopulation.  When  a  number  of  people  quit  a 
country,  there  is  more  employment  and  greater  plenty  of  the 
means  o$  fubfiftence  left  for  thofe  who  remain ;  and  the  vacancy 
is  foon  filled  up.  The  grand  caufes  of  depopulation  are,  not 
migrations: ,  or  even  famines  and  plagues,  cr  any  other  temporary 
evils',  but  ih*  permanent  and  llo^ly  working  evils  of  de? 
bauchery,  luxury,  high  taxes,  and  oppreflion. 


(    59    ) 

With  refpeft  to  the  Colonifts ;  it  would  be  folly  to  pretend 
they  are  fauitlefs.  They  were  running  fail  into  our  vices. 
But  this  quarrel  gives  them  a  falutary  check :  And  it  may  be 
permitted  on  purpofe  to  favour  them,  and  in  them  the  reft  of 
mankind ;  by  making  way  for  the  eftablifhment,  in  an  exten- 
iive  country  poflefTed  of  every  advantage,  a  plan  of  government, 
and  a  growing  power  that  fhall  aftonifh  the  world,  and  under 
which  every  fubjecl  of  human  enquiry  mail  be  open  to  free 
difcuflion,  and  the  friends  to  Liberty,  in  every  quarter  of  the 

globe,  find  a  fafe  retreat  from  civil  and  fpiritual  tyranny. 1 

hope  therefore,  our  brethren  in  America  will  forgive  their  ene- 
mies.    It  is  certain  that  they  know  not  what  they  are  doing. 


CONCLUSION. 


HAVING  faid  fo  much  of  the  war  with  America,  and 
particularly  of  the  danger  with  which  it  th^a:ens  us,  it 
may  be  expected  that  I  mould  propofe  fome  method  of  efcaping 
from  this  danger,  and  of  reftoring  this  once  happy  Empire 
to  a  ftate  of  peace  and  fecurity. — Various  plans  of  pacification 
have  been  propofed  ;  and  fome  of  them  by  perfons  lb  diftin- 
guifhed  by  their  rank  and  merit,  as  to  be  above  my  applaufe. 
But  till  there  is  more  of  a  difpofition  to  attend  to  fuch  plans, 
they  cannot,  I  am  afraid,  be  of  any  great  fervice.  And  there 
is  too,  much  reafon  to  apprehend,  that  nothing  but  calamity 
will  bring  us  to  repentance  and  wifdom.— In  order,  how- 
ever,, to  complete  my  defign  in  thefe  obfervations,  I  will  take 
the  liberty  to  lay  before  the  public  the  following  fketch  of-. 
one  of  the  plans  juft  referred  to,  as  it  was  opened  before  the 
holidays  to  the  houfe  of  Lords  by  the  Earl  of  Shelburne ;  who, 
while  he  held  the  feals  of  the  Southern  department,  with  the 
bufmefs  of  the  Colonies  annexed,  pofFeffed  their  confidence, 
without  ever  compromifing  the  authority  of  this  country ;  a 
confidence  which  difcovered  itfelf  by  peace  among  themfelves, 
and  duty  and  fubmiffion  to  the  Mother-country.  I  hope  I 
fhall  not  take  an  unwarrantable  liberty,  if,  on  this  occafion, 
I  ufe  his  Lordfhip's  own  words,  as  nearly  as  X  have  been  abl« 
to  colled  them. 

H  a  "Meet 


(    6o    ) 

ft  Meet  the  Colonies  on  their  own  ground,  in  the  laft  pe- 
tition from  the  Congrefs  to  the  king  :  The  fureft,  as  well 
as  the  moll  dignified  mode  of  proceeding  for  this  country. — 

Suipend  all  hoftilities Repeal  the  afts  which  immediately 

diftrefs    America,    namely,    the   laft  retraining  aft, the 

charter  act, the  ad  for  the  more  impartial  adminiftraticn 

of  juftice, and  the  Quebec  aft.— —Ail  the  other  afts  (the 

cuftom-houfe  aft,  the  poft-office  aft,  Sec.)  leave  to  a  tem- 
perate revifal. There  will  be  found  much  matter  which 

both  countries  may  wilh  repealed.  Some  which  can  never 
be  given  up,  the  principal  being  that  regulation  of  trade  for 
the  common  good  of  the  Empire,  which  forms  our  Palladium, 
Other  matter  which  is  fair  fubjeft  of  mutual  accommodation. 

Prefcribe   the  moil  explicit   acknowledgment  of  your 

right  of  regulating  commerce,  in  its  moil  exteniive  fenfe  ; 
if  the  petition  and  other  public  afts  of  the  Colonies  have  not 
already,  by  their  declarations  and  acknowledgments,  left  it 

upon  a  fufficiently  fecure  foundation. Belides  the  power 

of  regulating  the  general  commerce  of  the  Empire,  ibme- 
thing  further  might  be  expected  j  provided  a  due  and  tender 
regard  were  had  to  the  means  and  abilities  of  the  feveral 
provinces,  as  well  as  to  thofe  fundamental,  unalienable  rights 
of  Englijhmen,  which  no  father  can  furrender  en  the  part 
of  his  Ion,  no  reprelenter  on  the  j.a-t  of  his  elector,  no 
generation  on  the  part  of  the  fucceeding  one  ;  the  right 
of  judging  not  only  of  the  mode  of  raifmg,  but  the  quantum, 

and  the  appropriation  of  fuch  aids  as  they  mall  grant.- 

To  be  more  explicit;  the  debt  of  England,  without  entering 
into  invidious  diitinftions  how  it  came  to  be  contracted, 
might  be  acknowledged  the  debt  of  every  individual  part  of 

the  whole  Empire,  Afia,  as  well  as  America,  included. 

Provided,  that  full  fecurity  were  held  forth  to  them,  that 
fuch  free  aids,  together  with  the  Sinking  Fund,  (Great- 
Britain  contributing  her  fuperior  mare)  mould  not  be  left  as 
the  privy  purfe  of  the  minifter,  but  be  unaiienably  appro- 
priated to  the  original  intention  of  that  fund,  the  difcharge 
of  the  debt ;  and  that  by  an  honeft  application  of  the 
whole  fund,  the  taxes  might  in  time  be  leilcncd,  and  the 
price  of  our  manufactures  coniequently  reduced,  fo  that 
every  contributory  part  might  feel  the  returning  bene- 
fit  always  iuppcling  the  laws  of  trade  duly  obferved  and 

enforced, 

««  The 


(    6i     ) 

'*  The  time  was,  I  am  confident—  and  perhaps  is,  when 
**  thefe  points  might  be  obtained  upon  the  eafy,  the  conititu- 
"  tional,  and,  therefore,  the  indifpen  fable  terms  of  an  exemption 
*'  from  parliamentary  taxation,  and  an  admifiion  of  the  facred- 
*l  nefs  of  their  charters;  inftead  of  facrificing  their  good 
"  humour,  their  affection,  their  effectual  aids,  and  the  aft  of 
f*  navigation  itfelf,  (which  you  are  now  in  the  direct  road 
c<  to  do)  for  a  commercial  quit  rent,  *  or  a  barren  metaphy- 
"  iical  chimsra.—- rHow  long  thefe  ends  may  continue  attain- 
•?  able,  no  man  can  tell.- — But  if  no  words  are  to  be  relied  on 

•'  except   fuch  as  make  againft  the  Colonies If  nothing  is 

"  acceptable,  except  what  is  attainable  by  force  ;  it  only  re- 
"  remains  to  apply,  what  has  been  fo  often  remarked  of  un- 

V  happy  periods, £>uos  deus  <vult,  &ff." 

Thefe  are  fentiments  and  propofals  of  the  laft  importance  ; 
and  I  am  very  happy  in  being  able  to  give  them  to  the  public 
from  fo  reipectable  an  authority,  as  that  of  the  diitinguimed 
Peer  I  have  mentioned ;  to  whom,  I  know,  this  kingdom,  as 
weli  as  America,  is  much  indebted  for  his  zeal  to  promote 
thofe  grand  public  points  on  which  the  prefervation  of  Liberty 
among  us  depends  ;  and  for  the  firm  oppofition  which,  jointly 
with  many  others  (Noblemen  and  Commoners  of  the  fim  Cha- 
racter and  abilities, )  he  has  made  to  the  prefent  meafures. 

Had  fuch  a  plan  as  that  now  propofed  been  adopted  a  few 
months  ago,  1  have  little  doubt  but  that  a  pacification  would 
have  taken  place,  on  terms  highly  advantageous  to  this  king- 
dom.  In   particular.      It   is    probable,   that    the    Colonies 

would  have  confented  to  grant  an  annual  fupply,  which,  in- 
creafed  by  a  faving  of  the  money  now  fpent  in  maintaining 
troops  among  them,  and  by  contributions  which  might  have 
been  gained  from  other  parts  of  the  empire,  would  have  formed 
a  fund  confiderable  enough,  if  unalienably  applied,  f  to  redeem 

the 
*  See  the  Refolutions  on  the  Nova- Scotia  petition  reported  to  the 
I-L-ufe  of  Commons,  November  29,  1775,  hy  Loid  North,  Lord 
George  Germaine,  &c.  and  a  bill  ordered  to  oe  brought  in  upon 

the  (aid  Resolutions. There  is  indeed,  as  Lord  Shelburne 

has  tinted,  fomething  very  aftonifhing  in  thefe  Refolutions.. 
They  offer  a  relaxation  of  the  authority  of  this  country,  in 
points  to  which  the  Colonies  have  always  confented,  and  by 
which  we  are  great  gainers  ;  at  the  fame  time,  that,  with  a  ri- 
gour which  hazards  the  Empire,  we  are  maintaining  its  autho- 
rity in  points  to  which  they  will  never  confent  j  and  by  which 
nothing  can  he  gained. 

.f  See  the  Appendix. 


(      62      ) 

the  greateft  part  of  the  public*  debt ;  in  confequence  of  which, 
agreeable  to  Lord  Shelburne's  ideas,  fome  ofoui  woril  taxes 
might  be  taken  off,  and  the  Colonies  wouldx  receive  our  manu- 
factures cheaper, ;  our  paper-currency  might  be  retrained ;  our 
whole  force  would  be  free  to  meet  at  any  time  foreign  danger ; 
the  influence  of  the  crown  would  be  reduced  ;  our  parliament 
would  become  more  independent ;  and  the  kingdom  might, 
perhaps,  be  reftored  to  a  fituation  of  permanent  farety  and 
profperity. 

To  conclude. — An  important  revolution  in  affairs  of  this 
kingdom  feems  to  be  appjoaching.  If  ruin  is  not  to  be  our 
lot,  all  that  has  been  "lately  done  mull  be  undone,  and  new 
meafures  adopted.  At  that  period,  an  opportunity  (never  per- 
haps to  be  recovered,  if  loft)  will  offer  itfelf  for  ferving  efTen- 
iially  this  country,  as  well  as  America  ;  by  putting  the  national 
debt  into  a  fixed  courfe  of  payment  ;  by  iubje&ing- to  new  re- 
gulations, the  adminillration  of  the  finances ;  and  eftabiifhing 
meafures  for  exterminating  corruption  and  restoring  the  consti- 
tution,--For  my  own  part ;  if  this  is  not  to  be  the  confequence 
of  any  future  changes  in  the  miniftry,  and  the  fyftem  of 
corruption,  lately  fo  much  improved,  is  to  go  on  ;  I  think 
it  totally  indifferent  to  the  kingdom  who  are  in,  or  who  are 
out  of  power. 


APPENDIX. 


APPENDIX. 


Amount  of  the  National  Debt  at  Midfummer,    1775. 


The  amount  of  the  capitals  at  the 
Bank,  South  Sea  and  India  Houfes 
was,  in  Jan.  1775, 125,056.454!. 
See  the  particulars  in  an  account 
by  R.  Helm,  at  the  Stock  Ex- 
change,correfted  for  Jan. 5  1775. 

Deduct  424,5001.  Consolidated 
Annuities,  246,300).  Reduced; 
161,6501.  Old  S.  S.  Annuities, 
and  43,3501.  Annuities  1771, 
making  in  all  a  million  of  the 
3  per  cents,  paid  off  in  1775  >  aDC* 
the  remainder  will  be 

Annuities  for  99, 96,  and  89 years, 
granted  in  King  William's  time. 
Suppofing  18  years  to  come  of 
theie  Annuities,  their  value  will 
be  (reckoning  intereft  at  $%  per 
cent)  1 3I  years  purchafe,or  nearly. 

Annuities  for  li^es,  with  benefit  of 
furvivorfhip,  in  King  William's 
time,  fuppofed  worth  four  years 
purchafe. — N  B.  The  benefit  of 
furvivorfhip  is  to  be  coetinued  till 
the  Annuities  are  reduced  to  Seven 
and  they  are  not  yet  reduced  to 
this  number. 

Annuities  on  lives,  with  benefit  of 
furvivorfhip.  granted  Anno  1765, 
valued  at  20  years  putchafe     • 

Annuities  for  two  or  three  lives, 
granted  in  1695  Alfo  Annuities 
on  fingle  lives,  1745,1746.1747. 
The  original  amount  ef  thefe  An- 
nuities, taken  all  together,  was 
-near  1 30,000 1.  Tbey  are  now  re- 
duced by  deaths  to  about  8o,oooI. 
I  have  valued  tbem  at  10  years 
D.ur  chafe         * 


Principal. 


24,056,454 


1,801,179 


Intereft. 


I36»455 


30,268 

1 0,80c 


800,000 


Total  £.126,698,701 


8o,oco 

4,542  430 
Long 


(    64    ) 


Brought  over. 

Long  annuity  for  99  years  1761— - 
The  vaiueof  this  annuity  is  in  the 
ALLEYabout25  iyearspurchafe, 
but  the  remaining  term  is  really 
worth  27  years  purchase     -     - 

UNFUNDED  DEBT,  confift- 
ingofExcheq.Bills(i>25c  cool.) 
Naty  debt  (1,850,000!.)  andCi- 
vil  Lift  debt,fuppofed  500, cool. 
The  intercft  is  reckoned  at  no 
more  than  2  -§■  per  cent* 


Principal. 

/• 
126,698,701 


6.70**750 


3  600,000 


Inter eft. 

4542,430 


248,25c 


90,000 


Totalofthe  National  Debt  in  1775,    137,001,451  4,880.680 

I  have  given  the  Navy  Debt  as  it  was  about   a  year   ago.     It 

muft  be  now  greatly  encreafed. The  Civil  Lift  Debt  has  been 

given  by  guefs.  It  is  generally  acknowledged  not  to  be  lefs  than 
the  fum  I  have  fpecified;  and  it  is  alio  expected,  that   the  Civil 

Lift  income  will  be  raifed  to  900,000  1.  per  annum In    1769 

the  (urn  of  513,51 1 1.  was  granted  by  Parliament  towards  dis- 
charging the  arrears  and  debts  then  due  on  the  Civil  Lift. 

By"  an  act  of  thefirft  of  George  II.  the  Civil  Lift  was  made 
up  800,000 1.  whenever,  in  any  year,  the  duties  and  revenues 
appropriated  to  it  fell  fhort  of  that  Turn.  The  cleaj  produce  cf 
thefe  duties  for  33  years,  or  from  Midfummer  1727,  to  Midfum- 
mer  1760,  was  according  to  a  particular  account  in  my  pofTef- 
fion,  26,182,981 1.  17s.  6d. or  795,242  \.  per  ann.  They  fell  (hort, 
therefore,  taking  one  year  with  another,  more  than  they  exceded. 
In  1747  tnev  naa*  been  deficient  for  Jeven  years  together  ; 
and  the  whole  deficiency  amounted  to  456,733!.  1 6s.— which, 
in  conformity  to  the  act  I  have  mentioned,    was    made  good  to 

his  Majefty  out  of  the  fupplies  for  that  year. In    1729    alfo, 

Xi7,oool.  was  granted  out  of  the  fupplies  f>r  the  like  reafon  — 
This  is  all  the  mosey,  received  by  his  late  Majefty  from  Parlia- 
ment, towards  fupporting  his  houlhold  and  the  dignify  of*  his 
civil  government;  or  8 10,7491. per  ann, — I  have  thought  proper 
to  ftate  this  matter  fo  particularly  here,  becaufe  accounts  grolsly 
wrong  have  been  given  of  it. 

The  amount  of  the  National  Debt,  it  has  appeared,  was  laft 
year  137  millions.  The  great  deficiencies  of  laft  year,  added  to  the 
extraordinary  expences  of  the  prefect  year,  will  increafo  this  debt 
confiderabJy.  Drawing  out,  embodying,  and  maintaining  the  mi- 
litia in  the  laft  war,  coft  the  nation  nea-  half  a  million  per  ann. 
We  cannot  reckon  upsn  a  lefs  expence  in  doing  this  now.      Add 

to 


.       C    65   ) 

to  it,  pay  for  foreign  troops,  and  all  the  extraordinary  expences  of 
our  increafed  Navy  and  Army,  tranfport  fervice,  recruiting  fervice, 
ordnance,'&c.  and  it  will  be  evident  that  the  whole  expence  of  this 
unhappy  year  mnft  be  enormous. — But  I  expect  that  care  will 
be  taken  to  hide  it,  by  funding  as  little  as  pofBble,  and  that  for 
this  reafon  it  will  not  be  known  in  its  full  magnitude,  till  it  comes 
to  appear  another  year  under  the  articles  of  Navy  debt,  extraordi- 
naries  of  the  army,  tranfport  bills,  ordnance  debentures,  Sec.  making 
up  a  vaft  unfunded  debt,  which  may  bear  down  all  public  credit. 

State  of  the  National  Account   in   1775. 

ANNUAL      INCOME. 

Customs  in  England,  being  the  medium  of  the 
payments  into  the  Exchequer,  for  3  years,  ending 
in  1773  —  —■  —     2,528,275 

Amount  of  the  Excises  in  England,  including  the 
malt  tax,  being  the  medium  of  3  years,  ending 
in  1773  —  —  — -  —     4,649,892 

Land  Tax  at  3s.  —  —  —     1,300,000 

Salt  Duties,   being    the    medium    of    the    years 

1765  and  1766  —  —  —        218,739 

Duties  on  Stamps,  Cards,  Dice,  Advertifements, 
Bonds,  Leafes,  Indentures,  News-Papers,  Alma- 
nacks, &c.  —  —         —         —        280,788 

Duties  on  houfes  and  windows,   being  the  medium  of 

3  years  ending  in  177 1  —  —         —         3^S'3^9 

Poll   Office,    Seizures,     Wine   Licences,     Hackney- 

Coaches,  *  Tenths  of  the  Clergy,  &c.  —         250,000 

Excises  in  Scotland,  being  the  medium  of  3  years 

ending  in  1773  —  —  —  95,229 

Customs   in    Scotland,  being    the   medium    of    3 

years  ending  in  1773  —  —  —  68,369 

Inland  taxes  in  Scotland,  deduction  of  6d.  in  the 
pound  on  all  Penfions,  Salaries,  &c.  cafual  reve- 
nues, fuch  as  the  duties  on  Gum  Seneca,  Ameri- 
can revenue,  fale  of  lands  in  the  ceded  Iflands, 
&c. — Thefe  are  little  articles,  and  I  have  fuppo- 
fed  them  to  amount  to  as  much  as  will  make  the 
whole  revenue  ten  millions  per  ann.  tho'  it  is  almoft 
certain  they  cannot  produce  fo  much       —  —         223>339 

Total    £.     10,000000 


I  The 

*  Thefe  branches  of  the  revenue  produced  in  1754.,  210,243!.  I  do 
not  know  how  much  they  have  produced  lately  j  but  I  believe  I  have 
q(|imated  them  at  the  fcigheft.  * 


(     66     ) 

The  annual  medium  of  the  payments  into  the  Exchequer  from 
the  Customs   in  England,    for  the   lafl  five   years,    has    been 

2,521,7691. In  1774  this  payment  was   2,547,7171 In 

1775,  it   was   2,476,302  I. The  produce    of    the  Customs, 

therefore,  has  been  given  i»ather  too  high. 

The  produce  of  the  Excises  in  England  has  been  higher  in  1772 
and  1775  than  in  any  other  two  years;  but  the  average  of  any 
three  fucceffive  years,  or  of  all  the  five  years  fince  1770,  will  not 
differ  much  from  the  fum  I  have  given.  In  1754,  or  the  year 
before  the  laft  war,  the  Customs   produced  only  1,558,254!.— 

The  Excifes  produced  2,819,702  1 And  the  whole  revenue, 

excluiive  of  the  Land-Tax  at  2s,  was  7,097,617  I. 

ANNUAL      EXPENDITURE. 

—  £- 
Intereft  on  the  National  Debt  in  1775,              "  4,880,680 
Peace  eftablifhment  for  the  Navy  and  Army,   includ- 
ing all  mifcsllaneous  and  incidental  expences  3,700,000 
Annual  increafe  of  the  Navy  and  Civil  Lift  Debts  350,000 
Civil  Lift                 -                         -  8©o,ooo 


9730,680 
Surplus  of  the  Revenue  269,310 


£.  -10,000,000 


The  eftimate  for  the  peace  eftablifhment,  including  mifcellaneous 

expences,  amounted  in   1775   to  3,703,476  1. In   1774    it  a- 

nfOunted  to  3,804432  1.  excluiive  of  250,0001.  raifed  by  Exche- 
quer Bills,  towards  defraying  the  expence  of  calling  in  the  gold 
coin.  And  the  medium  for  eleven  years,  from  1765,  has  been 
nearly  3,700,000!.  According  to  the  accounts  which  I  have  col- 
lected, the  expence  of  the  peace  eftablifhment,  (including  mifcella- 
necus  expences)  was  in  1765,  1766,  and  1767,  3,540,000!. /«"  ann. 

♦In  1768,  1769,  and  1774,  it  was  3,354,000!.  per  ann In 

j  7 7  r,  1772,  1773.  *774  ant*  !775»  the  average  has  been  nearly 
four  millions  per  annum,  exclufive  of  the  expence  of  calling  in 
the  coin. 

This  parliament  votes  for  the  fea-fervice  4I.  per  month  per  man, 
including  wages,  wear  and  tear,  victuals,  and  ordnance.  This  al- 
lowance is  infufRcient,  and  fails  fhort  every  year  more  or  lefs,  in 
proportion  to  the  number  of  men  voted.  Fram  hence,  in  a  great 
mealure,  arifes  that  annual  increafe  cf  the  navy  debt,  mentioned  in 
the  third  article  of   the  National  Expenditure,     This   increafe  in 

1772 


(    *7 \) 

1772  and  1773  was  661,996!.  or  335,000!.  per  aun.  The  num- 
ber of  men  voted  in  thole  two  years,  was  20,000.  I  have  fuppofed 
them  reduced  to  16,000,  and  the  annual  increase  of  the  Navy- 
debt  to  be  only  250,0001. — — —Add  ioo,oooI.  for  the  annual 
increafe  of  the  Civil  Lift  Debt  (fee  page  64.)  and  the  total  will 
be  350,0001. 

A  Second  Method  of  Deducing  the  Surplus  of  the 

Revenue. 

UNAPPROPRIATED    REVENUE. 

Nett  Produce  of  the  Siking  Fund,  for  the  lad 
five  years,  including  cafual  furpluffes,  reckoned 
from  Lady-day  to  Lady-day  ;  being  the  annual 
median*,  after  deducing  from  it  about  45,0001. 
always  carried  to  it  from  the  fupplies,  in  order  to 
replace  fo  much  taken  from  it  every  year  to 
make  good  a  deficiency  in  a  Fund  eftabliflied  in  £ . 
1758.  ......     2.610,759 

Nett  annual    produce    of  Land   Tax  at   3s.    militia 

deducted:   and  of  the  Malt  Tax  -  -  -      1.800,000 

(N.  B.  Thefe  two  taxes  in  1773,  brought  in  only 
1.665,4751.)  : 

There  are  fome  cafual  Receipts,  not  included  in  the 
Sinking  Fund,  fuch  as  duties  on  Gum  Senega, 
Amecican  Revenue,  &c.  But  they  are  fo  uncertain 
and  inconfiderable,  that  it  is  fcarcely  proper  to 
^ive  them  as  a  part  of  the  permanent  Revenue. 
Add  however  on  this  account  -.  -.  -  50,000 


Total  of  unappropriated  *  Revenue    /.  4.460,759 

Produce  of  the^  Sinking  Fund,  reckoned  from  Lady- 
day  to  Lady-day. 
I77o     2.486,836 

I7?I       2.553,505 

1.772    - —    2.683,831 

1773  : —   2.823,150 

1774     2.731,476- 

1  2  In 

*  Thegrcateft  part  of  this  Revenue  is  borrowed  of  the  Bank,  an&fpent  before 
incomes  into  the  Kxchequer.      It  is,  therefore,  in 
fbntly  due  to  the  Bank,  f,r  which  intcreft  is  paid. 


(     68     ) 

In  1775  the  finking  Fund  was  taken  for  2900,000!.  including 
an  extraordinary  charge  of  ioo,oooI.  on  the  Aggregate  Fund. 
If  there  has  been  a  deficiency,  it  is  a  debt  contracted  laft  year, 
which  muft  be  added  to  other  debts  (referred  to  in  Page  64) 
arifing  from  deficiences  in  the  provifion  made  for  the  expences  of 
laft  year.  This  provifion  amounted  to  3.703,476  1 ;  but  it  is  faid 
to  have  fallen  fhort  above  a  million. 

ANNUAL     EXPENDITURE. 

Peace  Eftablifhment,    includiug  the  annual  increafe 

of  the  Navy  and   Civil   Lift  Debts    (fee  the  for-         £. 
mer  account)  -  -----      4.050,000 

Intereftat  2^  of  3.6000,0001.  unfunded  debt,  which 

muft   be  paid  out  of  the  unappropriated  Revenue  90,000 


Total     4.140,000 
Surplus         320,759 

Annual  income  £.  4.460,759 


Thefe  two  methods  of  deducing  the  Surplus  of  the  Revenue  con- 
firm one  another,  as  nearly  as  could  have  been  expected.  They 
cannot  agree  exactly,  unlefs  the  mean  produce  of  the  Sinking  Fund, 
and  of  all  the  takes,  are  taken  for  the  fame  years,  and  from  the 
fame  quarter  in  every  year.  • 

There  is  a  third  method  of  proving  that  the  permanent  furplus 
of  the  revenue  cannot  exceed  the  fum  now  (rated. 

I  have  learnt  from  the  higheft  authority,  that  the  national  debt, 
about  a  year  ago,  had  been  diminifhed  near  9  millions  and  a  half, 
fince  the  peace  in  1763  ;  including  a  million  of  the  3  per  cents  dif- 
charged  laft  year  -—The  money  employed  in  making  this  reduction, 
muft  have,  been  derived  from  the  furplus  of  the  ordinary  and 
ftated  revenue,  added  to  the  extraordinary  receipts.  Thefe  extra- 
ordinary receipts  have  confifted  of  the,  following  articles. 

1 .  The  Land  Tax  at  4s.  in  the  pound  in  1764,  i/6j,  and  1 77 1  ;  or 
is.    in  the  pound  extraordinary  for  three  years,  making  1.300,000 

2.  ,The  profits  of  Nine.  Lotteries,  making  (at  150,000!.  each 

lottery)    1.350,000!. — • — 3.     A  contribution  of  400,000!,  per  aim, 

from  the  India  company    for   five  years,-  making  2.ooo,oool. 

4.110.000I.  paid  by  the  Bank  in  1  764  for  the  privilege  of  exclufive 
banking.  Alfo  the  money  paid  by  France  for  maintaining  their 
prifoners  ;  and  the  money  arifing  from  the  fale  of  Ftench  prizes, 
taken  before  the  declaration  of  war ;  from  faving  on  particular  grants 

at 


(     69    ) 

at  the  end  of  the  war,  &c.  &c.-— which,  all  together,  *  I  will  fup- 
pofe  a  million.  Add  3.300,000!.  arifing  from  a  furplus  of 
300,0001.  for  eleven  years;  and  the  total  will  be  8.950,000!. 
which  is  a  fum  more  than  fufficient  for  difcharging  9  millions  and 
a  half  of  the  public  debt. 

Sketch  of  an   Account  of  the  Money   drawn  from    the 
Public  by  the  Taxes. 


Nett  Revenue         - 

Expence  of  collecting  the  Excise  in  England, 
being  the  average  of  the  years  1 767  and  1768, 
when  their  produce  was  4.531,0751.  per  ami, 
6  per  cent,  of  the  grofs  produce 

Expence  of  collecting  the  Excifes  in  Scotland, 
being  the  medium  of  the  years  1772  and  1773, 
and  the  difference  between  the  grofs  and  nett 
produce — 31  per  cent,  of  the  grofs  •produce     -     - 

Expence  of  collecting  the  Customs  in  England, 
being  the  average  of  1771  and  1772;  bounties 
included —  1 5  per  cent,  of  the  grofs  produce, 
exclusive  of  the  drawbacks  and  over-entries     -     - 

N.  B.     The  bounties  for  1771  were  202,8401.  for 
1772,    172,4681. 
For  1772,   285,7641.  or  10  per  cent,  nearly. 

Perquisites,  &c.  to  Cuftom-houfe  officers,  &c. 
fuppofed  to  be         —         —         —         — 

Expence  of  collecting  the  Salt-duties  inENGLAND, 
io^  per  cent.  - —  t —  —  — 

Bounties  on  fifh  exported         —         —         — 

Expence  of  collecting  the  duties  on  Stamps,  Cards, 
Advertifements,  &c.  ^percent.         —         — 

Expence  of  collecting  the  Land  Tax  at  3s. — 2^  per 
cent,  of  the  nominal  produce       — •  —        — 


£• 

10.000,00© 


297,887 


43>254 


468,703 


250,000 

27,000 
18,000 

18,000 

43i5CO 


Total  £.  1 1.166,344 


It  mud  be  feen,  that  this  account  is  imperfect.  It  is,  however, 
fufficient  to  prove,  that  the  whole  money  raifed  directly  by  the 
taxes,  exceeds  confiderably  Eleven    Millions.      But  as  the 

increafed 


The  Author  of  the  Prefent  State  of  the  Nation,  published  in  1768,  makes  all 
thefc  extraordinary  Receipts  to  amount  to  above  two  millions  and  a  half.  But 
the  greatefl:  part  of  them  were  applied  toiatisfy  German  claims,  andfomc  other 
debts,  not  properly  included  in  the  current  rrationul  expenditure. 


(     7°     ) 

increafed  pries  of  one  commodity  has  a  tendency  to  raife  the  price 
of  other  commodities  ;  and  as  alio  dealers  generally  add  more  than 
the  value  of  a  tax  to  the  price  of  a  commodity,  befides  charging 
jintereft  for  the  money  they  advance  on- the  taxes  ;  for  thefe  rea- 
fons,  it  feems  certain,  that  the  taxes  have  an  indirect  effect  of 
great  coniequence;  and  that  a  larger  fum  is  drawn  by  them  from 
the  public,  than  their  grofs  produce. —  [t  is  farther  to  be  confider- 
ed,  that  many  of  the  perfons  who  are  now  Supported  by  collecting 
the  taxes  would  have  fapported  then-delves  by  commerce  or  agri- 
culture ;  and,  therefore,  in  (read  of  taking  away  from  the  pub- 
lic frock,  would  have  been  employed  in  increafing  it. — Some  have 
reckoned,  that  on  all  thefe  accounts  the  expence  of  the  taxes  is 
doubled ;  but  this  mud  be  extravagant.  Let  us  fuppofe  a  quarter 
only  added  ;  and  it  will  follow,  that  the  money  drawn  from  the 
public  by  the  taxes  (exclufive  of  thofe  which  maintain  the  poor) 
is  near  14  millions  per  atzn  ;  a  fum  almoft  equal  to  the  whole  fpecie 
of  the  kingdom;  which,  therefore,  had  we  no  paper  currency, 
would  be  totally  inadequate  to.  the  wants  of  the  kingdom. 

Without  all  doubt  fuch  a  ftate  of  things,  in  a  great  commercial 
nation,  is  molt  dangerous,  and  frightful  ;   but   it  admits  of  no 

remedy,  while   the  public  debt  continues  what  it  is. With  a 

view,  therefore,  to  the  quick  reduction  of  this  debt,  I  will  throw 
away,  after  all  I  have  faid  on  this  fubject  on  former  occafions,  the 

following  propofals. It  has  appeared,  that,  fuppofing  the  taxes 

not  to  become  lefs  productive,  and  the  current  national  expence  to 
continue  the  fame  that  it  had  been  for  ten  years  before  1775,  a 
furplus.may  be  expected  in  the  revenue  of  about  300,0001.  per  ami. 

With  a  furplus  fo  trifling,  nothing  can  be  done  ;  but  it  might 

be  increafed,  fir  ft  of  all  ;  By  keeping  the  Land  Tax  fof  the  fu- 
ture at  4s.  in  the  pound. — As  rents  have  been  almoft  doubled, 
this  will  not  be  much  more  to  the  prefent  proprietors^  land,  than 
2s.  in  the  pound  was  formerly.  'Tis,  therefore,  equitable  ;  ajid 
it  will  add  to  the  national  income  near  450,000  1.  . 

Secondly*  All  the  money  now   fpent   in   maintaining  troops  in 

America  might  be  faved. The   Colonies  are  able  to  defend 

themfelves.  They  wifh  to  be  allowed  to  do  it.  Should  they  ever 
want  the  aid  of  our  troops,  they  will  certainly  be  very  willing 
to  pay  us  for  them.  Indeed  I  am  of  opinion,  they  will  never  be 
willing  to  make  peace  with  us,  without  ftipulating  that  we  fhall 
withdraw  our  troops  from  them.  Were  there  any  external  power 
that  claimed  and  exercifed  a  right  of  (rationing  troops  in  thisj 
country,  without  our  confent,  we  fhould  certainly  think  ourfelyes 

eniirely  undone. 1  will  eftimate  this  laving  at  no  more  than : 

200,000  1.  per  ann. 

Thirdly, 


(  n  ) 

Thirdly,  I  do  not  fee  why  the  peace  eftabjchment  might  not  be 
reduced  to  what  it  was,  at  an  average,    in  1&68,    J769  and  1770. 

This  would  produce  a  faving  of  3  50.000  r&per  ann. 1  might 

here  propofe  reducing  the  peace-eftabliihment  of  the  navy  to  what 
it  always  was  before  thelaft  war,. or  from  16,000  to  10, ceo  men. 
But  it  would  be  infinitely  better  to  reduce  the  Army  ;  and  this 
might  produce  a  farther  faving  of  great  confequence. — =-Bu£ 
waving  this,  I  mall  only  mention, 

Fourthly,  That  contributions  might  be  obtained  from  North- 
America  and  other  parts  of  the  Britiih  Empire,  on  the  prineiple- 
itated  from  the  Earl  of  Sh  elburne's  authority,  in  page  60.— 

I  will  eitimate  this  at  no  more  than   300,000!.  per   ann -Add 

the  furplus  now  in  our  poffeflion  ;  and  the  total  will  be  i/co,oco* 
In  the  Introdu£iion<o  the  third  edition  to  the  treat; fe  en  Re  * 
werjionary  Payments,  }  have  explained  a  method  of  payirg  cit  with 
a  iinking  fund  of  a  ntiJlion  per  ann.  \  a  hundred  millions  of  the 
national  debt  in  forty  years.  What  then  might  not  be  done  with 
fnch  a  fund  as  this  ? 

In  five  years  18,986,300!.  will  fall  from  an  intereft  of  4  per  cent ' 

to  3  per  cent.— — Alfo  4,500,0001.    $\  per  cent.  1758,   will  fall 

in  fix  years,  to  an  interelt  of  3  per  cent. The    long  annuities 

granted  in  King  William's  time,  amounting  to  136,4531.  will, 
in  18  years,  become  moftly  extinct  ;  as  will  alfo  the  greater  part, 
of  the  Life  Annuities  fpecified  in  page  63. — All  thefe  favings 
amount  to  more  than  400,0001.  per  ann.  And,  were  they  to  be 
added  to  the  fund  as  they  fall  in,  its  operations  would  be  Co  much 
accelerated,  that  in  a  few  years  we  mould  fee  this  country  above 
all  its  difficulties, — « — Still  more  might  be  done  by  {hiking  off 
unneceffary  places  and  penfions ;  by  giving  up  all  the  means  of 
corruption  ;  by  reducing  the  pay  of  the  great  officers  efftate;  and 

Amplifying  the  taxes. A  minifter  who  appeared  determined  to 

carry  into  execution  fuch  a  fyftem,  would  foon  gain  the  confidence 
of  the  publj£  ;  endear  himfelf  to  all  honeli  men  ;  and  in  time  come 

to  be  bleffed  as  ihe  Saviour  of  his   country. But   what   am    I 

doing? -We  have  no  fuch  happy  period  before   us.     Cur   mi- 

nifters  are  active  in  purfuing  meafures  which  mull  increafe  our 
burdens.  A  horrid  civil  *ar  is  begun  ;  and  it  may  foon  leave  us 
nothing  to  be  anxious  about. 

X  At  the  time  of  writing  the  introduction  here  referred  to,  about 
three  years  ago,  I  thought,  or  rather  hoped,  that  the  furplus  of  the  re- 
venue might  be  taken  at  900,000!.  per  ann.  But  it  muft  he  confidered, 
that  the  nation  was  then  in  poifeilion  of  a  contribution  of  4oo,oocl,  per 
ann.  from  the  India  Company,  which  has  been  fince  loft. — See  the  Ad- 
ditional Preface  to  the  2d  edition  oj  the  Appeal  to  the  Public  on  the  Juk- 
jeel  of  the  National  Debt. 

F  1  N  I  S. 


<ru 


\ 

// 
// 

tj 

*  / 


Z 


P 


fo< 


J 


i  / 


r- 


"71 


// 


5 


Deacidified  using  the  Bookkeeper  process. 
Neutralizing  agent:  Magnesium  Oxide 
Treatment  Date:  Dec.  2003 

PreservationTechnologies 

A  WORLD  LEADER  IN  PAPER  PRESERVATION 

1 1 1  Thomson  Park  Drive 
Cranberry  Township,  PA  16066 
(724)  779-21 1 1