Skip to main content

Full text of "Official report ... of the ... convention .."

See other formats


DONATION. 


OFFICIAL 


y ' 


Srace? 


; , 
5 
ES : 2 
© i ; 
1 ’ 
5 
3 5 
* S : 
‘ : : O30 y 
; ~ 4 - 
* A " 3 3 
’ \ ; 
4 i 5 
; , x Ss 5 
; 3 
“= ¥ 5 tA 
bs 2 + si = 
Ԥ 4 


ee a ‘nL SS 


PATIL TILT ESTEEETE EI TELEED EEE TE TIE og OE ooh Bde vis oo bo whe | 


OFFICIAL REPORT 


OF THE 


TWENTY-FOURT: 


OF THE 
Sle hh OF GAMIVORINEA: 


UNDER THE Auspices OF THE Srare Boarp or Horvicunturs, 
av San Josi, DECEMBER 12-15, 1899. 


si 


y PI IDIPIDIDIDISIDIS ICDA PDEA ee LEELA edhe senna sas saasasa ta saaeaaaaeaar ; 


4 SACRAMENTO: ae 
Me J. JOHNSTON, : : ¢ : 3 SUPERINTENDENT STATE PRINTING. 
7 1900. 


Set IP EIEIO UTTTITTT TEETER TTT TOL TL TET LOLS T TEES LEELA E TEES wt 


ss 


OFFICIAL REPORT 


e ewes ey OF THE 


ay yy - a“ *. bi 2 


awe NEY Pou REE. 


— STMTEFRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVETIN 


f 


STATE OF CALIFORNTA, 
l{ 1 


HELD UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE STATE Boarp or HorticuLtTurE, 
| AT San Jost, Decemper 12-15, 1899. _ 


2 SACRAMENTO: 24: > 


eee ee JOHNSTON oc SUPERINTENDENT STATE PRINTING. 
8 a eh re 


a 


cg) Su 
wa s 
4 * 
- 
: 
"i 
+ 
« 


Be a. 
apr oe aa | 
Soe ee 
oe > 
? any 
A 
We 
r 
4 
yh 


a ‘CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF -HORTICU 


| WILLTAM B. GESTER............ mcdeuies eases Patios: ee 
Commissioner for the El] Dorado So 


MOT AG. A RICH 33-5 se peep eas diate gigs Me i a pete Se 


Commissioner for the State at Large. 
\ 


ee WHENSTOCK > oti ee eer 
Commissioner for the Sacramento District. 


BEN M. MADDOX .........- “PES br iy ih uae Ont aa eee Pees 


5 (Ue ok Ras ae ea ee pace SEARLE Si iba Ea gs Se \ eee 
i Commissioner for the San Francisco District. 


Wier HOTOHKIAS.: 2c... al ees: a 
Commissioner for the Sonoma District. pain 


i—. ” 


y 
OFFICES: 
so State Capitol, Sacramento. 

BPs. ae a as Branch Office, Clay Street Dock, San sabe a 
Se CP hie ot, Aol ee is 

eo, enn ie she 6 ef ce ~ 

tf. 106 be * » » = ee €4¢ 

hela ES cot “Ge © wae caine = 

wea | 


itt APR 10 1905 
D. of D. 


3 | ; ; ¢ 
“ ; . ~* eF o*%a aol 
o i ats Ge, 
SF Wa SOs ti, Sn ee v wey © Rs ih rele > 


COOPERATION IN MARKETING PACIFIC COAST DRIED FRUIT. a 


= - CONTENTS 


FIRST DAY’S PROCEEDINGS. 


_ DISCUSSION ON COOPERATION ee ae eS Tg ae ees ee 


SECOND DAY’S PROCEEDINGS. 


REPORT ON THE FREE PUBLIC MARKET PROJECT. By EH. F. Adams, of 
Wrights ge = - - = = - = = ne Bee Mie ae a 


Prof. C. W. Childs, of San José - = = = bs a if z 2 = 


s ADVANTAGES OF ORGANIZATION AND COOPERATION. By A. H. 


near CE WO WOSW AN OClES Sai a ee Se ee 
DISCUSSION ON UNITY OF ACTION OR Ceeee ee Le ae 
DISCUSSION ON ORGANIZATION Se err k ie Sate ee 


PROSPECTIVE COMPETITION FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. = 


= ANNOUNCEMENT OF EXCURSION TO STANFORD UNIVERSITY - - . 


~ 


- RESOLUTION RELATIVE TO ADULTERATION OF FOOD PRODUCTS 


erot As EP: Hayne, @rberkeleys vos. so 0 ea iss ee ees 


: “RESOLUTION | RELATIVE TO THREATENED REDUCTION OF DUTIES 


OTs Py OPES es GW BY 0 Eee BIS se Sealer eh ee seem Orage eee rece 


ANNOUNCEMENT OF ENTERTAINMENT BY THE CITIZENS OF SAN 
DUS ee 


Laie 


gs 


aes — ‘THIRD DAY’S PROCEEDINGS. 


RESOLUTION RELATIVE TO RECIPROCITY AND OTHER TREATIES - 
_ COOPERATION AMONG THE FARMERS AS APPLIED TO THE RAISIN 


INDUS7TRY. By M. Theodore Kearney, of Fresno Be ee age he 


WORDS OF WELCOME. By Hon. B. G. Hurlbert, of SanJosé - - - oe 
‘ PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. By Hon. Ellwood Cooper, of Santa Barbara - 6 
Pee rormMinNer OF COMMITTEES (=.=. 2° 2 Se ag 

, REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA FRUIT GROWERS AND SHIPPERS’ 
ASSOCIATION. By H. Weinstock, of Sacramento Sui hee ose ee Caer 13 
REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN CONSULAR SERVICE - - - 15 
REPORT OF COMMITPHE ON NICARAGUA CANAL 72. = =~. =, 17 

REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON ORGANIZATION OF FRUIT-GROWERS’ | 

Bete uO MHENOUN Gee ore eee ea ee in ee 
REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION <a ve Legere 20 
22 


59 


09 


civ CONTENTS. 


DISCUSSION 


- - - - - =- - - 


NEW FRUIT CREATIONS. By Luther Burbank, of Santa Rosa - -_ - a 


THE ASSOCIATE CALIFORNIA FRUIT EXPORTERS—REPORT OF THE 
COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATION. By B.N. Rowley, of San Francisco -— 


DANGEROUS PESTS QUARANTINED BY THE STATE BOARD OF HOR- 


TICULTURE. By Alexander Craw oh pete Pee Ps 9 


BIRDS AS BENEFACTORS TO THE FARMER AND FRUIT- GROWER. = 
W. Otto Emerson, of Haywards. - (0-00 5704-8 == eS = ie 


SUBSTITUTES FOR PARIS GREEN. By Prof. C. W. Woodworth, of Berkeley a 
NATIONAL HORTICULTURAL QUARANTINE - - - = 9 =) ae 
RESOLUTION RELATIVE TO NICARAGUA CANAI -\7)" 1. (2 ahem oe. 
REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION = - = -  - =| 


APPOINTMENTS ON COMMITTEE ON ORGANIZATION 


“FRUIT TREE STOCKS. By Leonard Coates, of Napa-:- - =~ "= F752 


RESISTANT VINE STOCKS. By E. D. Sweetser, of SantaRosa - - - 


TWO NEW GRAPES OF PROMISE. By Prof. George Husmann, of Napa a 
APPLE CULTURE. By Edward Berwick, of Monterey a") Aap eee 


FOURTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS: 

2 OUR FRUITS IN EUROPEAN MARKETS. Soe Hon. Eugene Germain, of Los 
Angeles - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

IRRIGATION. By Prof. 8. M. Woodbridge, of Los Angeles - eee Sours 

REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON MR. ADAMS’S REPORT - - -  - = 

SELECTION OF THE NEXT MEETING PLACE i AT Sy ea 


ACCOUNT OF WORK OF THE BLASTOPHAGA, OR CAPRI FIG INSECT. 
By George C. Roeding, of Fresno a). LB) ge eee 


REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS -— - | 


DISCUSSION ON IRRIGATION. 222250000 Te pe eee ay 38) 


DISCUSSION ON PEACH-BORERS ni ThA SER al RAE Sg pt SS ae a 
DISCUSSION ON THE VINE-HOPPER .-  - +. ~ LAS he 
RESOLUTIONS OF THANKS - - - - oe i wt Ain, oii Se re 


APPENDIX. 

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE CALIFORNIA CURED 

MBGOCTATION (0 22025 ORL AS hls Rg ren Sse ie ee 
DIRECTORS OF THE CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION - - 

- BY-LAWS OF THE CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION - - 


131" 


FRUIT, = Sees 
Benes 


\ 


116 


120 


130... 


1siss 


--—s SYNOPSIS OF THE PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


—TWENTY-FOURTH STATE FRUIT-GROWERS CONVENTION. 


& - (Nore.—The State Board of Horticulture does not hold itself responsible for the 
Opinions or theories. which are expressed in the various Reapers; or words of the 
speakers, as they appear in this volume.) 


a ¢ 


FIRST DAY—TUESDAY. 


SAN José, Cat., December 12, 1899. 


Pursuant to call, a convention of fruit-growers and others interested 
in horticulture and kindred pursuits in California, assembled in con- 
vention in Auditorium Hall. 

The convention was called to order at 10 o’clock a. m. Rev. Mr. 
o es of San José, made an invocation. r ; 
“ Prof. C. W. Cuitps, of San José, and Judge W. H. Arxsn, of Wrights, 
were chosen Vice- Presidente: 

_ ALFRED Barstow, of San José, was chosen Assistant Secretary 


WORDS OF WELCOME. 


Hon. B. G. Huriserr, of San José, delivered a warm address of wel- 
come. In an impressive manner the speaker urged the importance of 
cooperation in the fruit interests in order to secure a remedy for the 
_ evils of excessive transportation rates that amount to only a degree less 
‘than prohibition of the industry, and also to secure legislation that in 
- Congress is being delayed, no doubt through. the influence of wealthy 
railway magnates. They have, it was urged, obstructed the building of 
the Nicaragua Canal after every preparation seemed to point to the — 
commencement of the enterprise. The speaker pointed out that 
although this session of Congress is to be a long one, about six months, 
_ yet it has already gone forth that the “press of business” would be so 
great that it would be impossible to get at the canal bill this year. 
_ The great need of codperation in order to prevent hurtful legislation 
in the way of so-called reciprocity treaties was pointed out. Judge 


Le 


all parts of the State. 
At the conclusion of the address a vote of thanks for the iki 
of welcome was passed by the convention. ETE Ss 


PO UDEERS BY HON. ELLWOOD COOPER, PRESD 


LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: This is the twenty-fourth. State 
Growers’ Convention and the twentieth Bee under the aus iees 0: 
State Board of Horticulture. 3 

The members of the State Board had the pleasure of “meet i 
people of San José in the fall of 1892. Seven years have pas d 
although to me it seems only a short time since we were here. Many 
changes have taken place, and much discouragement to fruit- ; 
by reason of the financial disturbances and the insufficient rainfall 
during the past three years; but notwithstanding the drama a 


‘that concerns the fruit industry. Radical changes must oe necess 


be slow, because the great pede of people in any vou are - 


must adapt our methods to the eee that Reis i: us. es 

The greatest difficulty we have to overcome is a proper diate 
our fruits. This question has been discussed at every convention f 
_ the past fifteen years. At our last meeting I recommended that ag nt 


where fruit can be sold, to arrange with responsible mercantile hi 
to sell the fruits, to fix the prices, to hold meetings where necessary, a 
to exhibit to a certain extent how to cook the dried fruits by distrik 
ing the bulletin as published by the Board a few years ago. 
words, to educate the people in what is to their interest, as well as 
Relanainie the quantity that each market will take at a fair price to tk 
producer; to arrange central houses in all the large markets so as to 
prevent overstocking or depressed prices. To be successful we m 
control the sales and manage our own products. These agents 
work in the interests of our every product. A small per cen 
commissions paid would be sufficient to meet this expense. ‘ : 
plan would give us better railroad facilities; competition amon, 
common carriers would insure the best pousele terms and. the 
time in transit; all rebates would come to the producers. » 

Jan atl aren, in giving his impressions of American chara 


TWENTY-FOURTH STATE FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 


ms 


_ few exceptions, bow the knee to this golden calf. To get money with- 
out giving an equivalent is so deeply rooted that it tends to swerve us 
- in all our business transactions. The lack of a high state of commercial 
= honor seriously affects the public mind, and where it will end the future 
alone can determine. It is the universal opinion among fruit-growers 
: that the best success can only be obtained by codperation, unity, and 
concentration; and yet it has been stated in public discussion by 
intelligent fruit-growers that they were convinced that concentration 
was impossible. Why? There can be only one of two conclusions: 
that is, either a want of confidence in our ability to sell our own 
products, | or a distrust of fair dealing by those intrusted with the 
2 management. Yet while we distrust each other we trust people whom 
= we have never seen, and who manage the sales of our products and 
_ grow rich by our acastey and labor. Combinations are not always 
_ formed for the best interests of the producers. A close examination 
_ will either discover a great lack of business tact or create a doubt as to 
_ the strict honesty of the managers. I might cite for example, the 
_ Walnut-Growers’ Association of Southern California. The area adapted 
_ to the cultivation of the walnut is very limited. The product is not 
great, so that a combination in the sale of these nuts is not cumbersome. 
‘The last crop was the first where the different associations agreed to fix 
one price for the various grades. In former years each association did 
its business in a secret manner; that is, they made arrangements with 
some business firm to sell the entire product at not less than a given 
_ price, the seller to charge a fixed commission to be deducted from said 
price. The crop of 1898 being a short one, the price soon advanced 
a above the association fixed prices. The contractors to sell the crop had, 
as soon as the arrangements with the various associations were peek ien 
_ made sub-contracts with nut-dealers, in all the districts where the nuts 
_ were consumed, to place them at a given price based upon the prices 
fixed with the associations. The advance in prices did not, therefore, 
_ benefit the producers who were in the associations. In 1899 the associa- 
_tions agreed to unite and fix a price at a given date before the crop was 
ready to harvest. In the early season I had written to. our association 
_ that unless a certain course was pursued I would withdraw from the 
association. My plan was, first, to advance materially the price at 
_ which we would sell; peed. that the nuts must be accepted and paid 
a for, cash, at the papas point; third, that we would guarantee to the 
purchasers that no nuts would be sold at a less price, but that we would 
_ reserve the right at any time to advance the price and in each advance 
see : guarantee the purchasers that no nuts would be sold at a less price than 
es the last advance. At the Fresno Convention, held one year ago, a 
detailed statement was made by Mr. M. Theo. Resuney. President of the 
_-Raisin- ‘Growers’ Association. The above plan was based on the oper- 


geek 
a! 


- . ’ ; a - 
8 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


ations of that association. I was so impressed with the wisdom of tl 
Fresno plan that I thought I saw clearly the way out of depress 
prices for our fruits. To return to walnuts. I was offered one quarter 
of a cent a pound ahove the price to be fixed by the associations. This - 
offer was made thirty days prior to the time the price was fixed. Ifthe 
association walnuts were in the open market, why should any business _ 
firm offer a higher price for the association’s grades outside the associa- — 
tion? I confess I had my suspicion of the management. Evidently 
the product was not in the open market. The large purchasers prob- : 
ably had the promise of the nuts, or in some way were assured that — a4 
they could get the control, and that may have had something to. do with — a 
fixing the prices. Guise of this purchasing combination there were 
many buyers to the extent of several carloads each. These outsiders ae 
least had the belief that they could not enter the combination of - 


te) 

asi 

purchasers, and that to buy from the combination they would have to . 
pay half a cent above the prices to be fixed, hence entered the field out ae 
side the associations in the hope of saving one quarter of a cent per = 
pound. Thirty-five cents per one hundred pounds above the price fixed _ i 
by the associations was freely offered in Santa Barbara. It is true that — oa 
any association having a flat offer for the entire output would be justified aie 
in making a great effort to have a price made to conform to the offer; : 


that is, if the price was high enough to warrant a living profit to the oF 
producer. I hope that this question will be fully discussed and that — 
the members will receive much light from the experience of those who 
are in the associations. That we will arrive sooner or later at the : . 
proper solution of this question is my honest conviction. 


Po * 


Insect Pests.—This subject, second in importance to the fruit- -grower, 
has received our attention at every convention since organization. a 
We have made great advances in combating the destructive enemies. — ay 
The theory which I have advanced in my opening addresses for many — a 
years grows more and more fixed in my mind as the only intelligent — 
one and which eventually will be universal throughout the civilized — 
world with all the cultivators of the soil: that is, to keep these invading — 
foes in subjection by their natural enemies. Twenty years ago, whales = 
was called the San José scale was making terrible havoc on the decidu-_ aa 
ous fruits and fruit trees in Santa Clara County. To-day this pest is = 
scarcely known by the fruit-growers. Later, the Icerya purchasi, ¢ com- ee 
monly called the “‘white scale,” threatened the citrus industry in South- — 2 
ern California. To-day there is not a citrus-grower in that region who 
fears this enemy. Still later, the ravages of the black scale on the olive 
was such a menace that it was a question whether the product would be 
sufficient to meet the expense of fighting the pest. Still later, the 
purple scale made its appearance in Southern California and spreai 


. : as 


« 


-“TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 9 


purchasi. We hear that in Hawaii this pest has been completely de- 
stroyed bya ladybird. The agent sent to the Islands to procure colonies 
of this ladybird, to be distributed in the infested districts, could find 
only a few specimens, and the problem he had to solve was to find 


aS sufficient food to make a success in propagating the beetles to send here. 


It is not necessary to reiterate what performed this important service 
to the fruit-growers. The history is well known to all of you. There 
is no doubt in my mind but that we will be confronted from time to 
time with new and dangerous pests. Weshould therefore be organized 
and ready to meet them with their natural enemies. 

I beg to refer you to my address made one year ago at Fresno, in 


which I urged that a sufficient appropriation be made and a special 
bureau be established as a part of the State Board of Horticulture, for 


the investigation of predaceous insects and parasites. This work should 
be continuous and permanent. We have recently read of a worm, 
something like an army worm, destroying the alfalfa fields by the thou- 
sands of acres in the middle West. Also, of the attack on the beet 


fields. It is possible that this worm may reach us here and cause great | 
loss to the sugar-beet industry, as also to the alfalfa fields of the San 


- Joaquin Valley. 


‘The codling moth is probably more generally diatiboted throughout 
the United States than any other fruit pest, and no doubt causes greater 
loss than any other known pest. In many places the growing of 


_ apples and pears has been abandoned on account of it, and yet not one 


dollar has been appropriated to investigate or to search for a possible 
_ enemy to keep it in check. Thousands of dollars are spent every year 


_. in spraying with poisons to save a part of the crop. 


In Hamilton’s Essays, where the discovery of the attraction of gravi- 


tation by Sir Isaac Newton is referred to, it is said that it took the world 


i) Sa 


six thousand years to produce a thinker. How much longer will be 


required to produce in the minds of the cultivators of trees and plants 


: the comprehension of natural laws? The late Baron Ferdinand von 


Mueller, the great botanist of Australia, has laid down the theory that 


the human mind cannot be properly or fully developed without coming 


in contact with growing plants. According to this theory, the fruit- 
grower and the farmer should bein advance of any other class. When 
nature plants a forest she makes no mistakes. She plants the right trees 


min the right places: flowers, annuals, bulbous roots, flowering shrubs and 


vines, all flourish in their beatiy and grandeur. No enemies—insects or 


rate animals—materially disturb them, at least until invaded by man. 
If we wish to succeed we must follow nature and maintain the same 
= balance as created. 


The State Board has available $7,500 to be spent in the search for the 


enemies of the destroyers of our fruits. We have an agent, George 


10 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE | 


Compere, now traveling with Albert Koebele, who is in the se ce 
the Hawaiian government. The last letter received from George Co 
pere was dated October 19th, from Sura, Fiji He had nee se 


the result af his trip. It is my intention, always prog . 
brother sae yeaa agree with me, to send him to Southern I 


been kept in check by its natural enemy. 
lished by the State Board nearly twenty years ago. 


duty. An arrangement has been made by the Departs to a 
product processed both in New York and in Chicago. oe ask 


establish the value of this product for us. The fruit must be aie 
before it turns color. 


convention. We had faved to obtain legislation to protect the pre 
ducers, but failed to get any measure to aid us. I am also sorry to 
report that the Interstate Pure Food Law that was pending in Congress ne 
did not pass. The combination of capital interested in this dishones Bes 
and profitable business seems to be too great. How such an ime Ba 

measure is to be reached is more than I ean see at this writing. ‘of 
us are familiar with the canned beef scandal, spoiled bacon, etc., ete. 


were visited by many representatives of faston agricultural Ree 
A report was made by these representatives that there had been c¢ 
covered a rock in North Carolina that. could be oleae into powaes to n 


Been: There does not agnenr to be anything that can ‘escape ee 
tampered with by swindlers who want gain without giving an ee 
lent. It is a most distressing state of affairs. ae 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. —— 11 


- pumping the water to irrigate. 
= -Railroads.—I treated this subject so fully seven years ago at this 
place that I beg to refer you to that address, to be found in the Report 
> for 1893-94, page 114. I have not changed my opinion as to the 
~ general plan of railroad management, but, on the contrary, am more 
and more convinced of the wisdom of such a plan. 


3 fruit-growers who have saved their crops by digging deep wells and 


Protection of our Forests.—It is very gratifying to know that our 
- Government is being rapidly educated up to the importance of this 
subject. Recently a proclamation by the President was issued with- 
drawing from settlement all the Coast Range or Santa Ynez Mountains 
from Gaviota Pass to.the Ventura line. Three years ago the survey of. 
these mountains was completed and. the district advertised for settle- 
- ment. Occupation for homesteads in this rugged district would be 
- very disastrous to the valleys between the mountains and the ocean, if 
settled up by the ordinary homeseeker. In the first place, it would 
__ lead to continuous fires, and possibly the drying up of all the mountain ~ 
streams, and thereby rake eventually what is now a valuable and — 
~~ important part of our State practically worthless. Secondly, if settled 
up these lands could not be regarded as having any value for producing 
a living to the settler. My experience leads to this conclusion, as those 
_ who have squatted on this land in years past, with few exceptions, have 
not prospered. Their living has depended upon making into firewood 
the natural growth and hauling it to market to be sold. Some four or ~ 
_ five years ago a great fire raged in these mountains immediately back 
_ of my land; while it did not consume the chaparral and trees, all were 
killed. The following year another fire raged over the same district. 
a The dead brush and dead trees added to its fury so that everything in 
_ its path was completely devastated. The first flood after this fire 
brought down ashes, the water being almost black as ink. The bottom 
as well as the sides of the main channel were black. This condition 
_ remained about half the winter. The remainder of that winter and the 
____two following the water ran muddy the entire time, bringing down sand 
and gravel by tens of thousands of tons, silting up the creek, destroying 
_ the springs and preventing the natural storage of water. Formerly this 
mountain was such a thicket that only wild animals could penetrate 
it; now it is barren and where not rocky is over shoe-top deep in sand 
5 and ashes. To perpetuate this condition, people, mostly foreigners, who 
_ have sheep and cattle, pasture them during the fall over this region, 
ae destroying all the young growth of bushes and trees germinated from 
_ seeds left after the fire. If this is allowed to continue God only knows 
“a what will be the result to the valleys below. In former years it 
5 required from five to six inches of rainfall to make flood water, and 


Sg TOMI ck TR YA a oe Sy 1 Sie 


i ts OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF ae 


which usually ran clear. com 
down in floods, bringing mud and sand—all runs aon and foweineee the 
ocean. It is a fact, which we know by observation, that about twi ¢ 
much rain falls 1 in these mountains as is see in the ee 


lands not occupied in the State of California, and ‘este ie des 
tation caused by prospecting for mineral es and for a 
poses. 


cere on President’s A 


mittee consisting of suee: J. R. Lewis, W. P. Cragin, and H. P. Stable 


APPOINTMENT OF COMMITTEES. 


The President announced the appointment of ue foltoaeine) co 


mittees: 
On Resolutions. - (ie ee 
W. 4H. ArKxen, Wrights. ALFRED Barstow, San José. — a 
T. A. Rice, El Rio. ‘ Joun Marxkiey,Sonoma, 
Jouyn Rock, Niles. 


On Legislation. 


Pror. C. W. Cuitps, San José. H. P. Stasier, Yuba City. 
G. W. Hurcutins, Marysville. JupGE J. R. Lewis, San José. 
B. N. Row ey, San Francisco. 


On Marketing. 


R. D. StepHeEns, Sacramento. Pror. D. T. Fower, Bavkciae 
A. D. Currs, Live Oak. A. H. Narrzcrr, Los Angeles. 
Ep. Berwick, Monterey. M. Tro. Kearney, Fresno. — 
A. Buiock, Santa Clara. . F. M. RIGHTER, Campbell. 


Frank H. Buck, Vacaville. 


Standing Committee on Transportation. 


R. D. Steruens, Sacramento. A. Buock, Santa Clara. 
ALEXANDER GoRDON, Fresno. W.N. GLADDEN, Healdsburg. 
N. W. BLANCHARD, Santa Paula. 


A recess was then taken until 1:30 o’clock. 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRTIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 13 


AFTERNOON SESSION—FIRST DAY. 


3 


TurEspay, December 12, 1899. 


Topics FOR THE Day: Review of the Year’s Fruit Shipments; 
Distribution, Marketing, and Increasing the Con- 
sumption of Fruit and Fruit Products. 


At 1:30 o’clock p. m. the convention reassembled, President Cooper in 
the chair. 


; REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA FRUIT GROWERS AND SHIP- 
: _ PERS’ ASSOCIATION. 


By COL. H. WEINSTOCK, or SacraMEntTo, PRESIDENT AND GENERAL MANAGER. 


The importance of widely distributing California fruits in the largest 
number of Eastern markets and avoiding gluts in a few large centers, 
seems to be keenly appreciated by growers and shippers, as evidenced 
by the larger shipments this year to smaller markets, and the opening 

of new markets in interior places—which, in the report, are grouped 

under the heading “ minor points”—thus in the interest of the grower, 

- preventing the gluts so common before the creation of this association. 

_ The consignments to foreign markets have also greatly increased—from 

_ 42 cars shipped by rail in 1896 to England alone, to 124 cars in 1899, 
shipped to England, Scotland, Germany, and Mexico. 

; In the early spring it was the opinion of the best informed growers 
and shippers that the largest yield of fruit California ever produced 
_ would be harvested this year; but the late frost, wind, and rain proved. 
- disastrous to the cherries and apricots, and the early rains and unfavor- 
= able conditions, to the grapes. The shipments of peaches, however, 
/ were double that of any year since 1894. The shipments of plums and 
_ prunes increased 63 per cent over last year. The shipments of apples 
decreased nearly 20 per cent, while the shipments of pears during the 
past four years have varied but slightly. The total shipments of 1899 
exceeded that of 1898 by 1,862 cars—an increase of 37 per cent. | 
The California Fruit Growers and Shippers’ Association has continued 
_ to successfully carry on the work delegated to it by the Growers, assem- 
-~ bled in convention in 1894:—maintaining union auction rooms, at each 
_ Eastern auction point, free and open to all buyers, thus getting all the 
buyers and all the fruit under one roof, at one time, and thereby secur- 
ing the very highest market price for the fruit. The Bureau of Infor- 
- mation has continued the publication of the daily bulletin, giving in 
tabulated. form the report of the railr oad companies, of the meal Hastern | 


- 


14 


not all that could be desired, and it can hardly be hoped that it can 
made perfect, yet it has, even in its imperfect state, proved of gr 
value to the grower and shipper, by giving them approximate infor: 0 
tion of the daily alipment, the varieties of fruit going forward, a 


DESTINATION— 1895 
REIN Peg ce ce pet nig eR aa ets 1,473 
MPT oe ones eae See ec eet MR 862: 
Branton te ig ot ea oe ae ee eee 
Phradelpiia, 0) oo es a ee ites tis 82 
PREINER DOU eo. So. ke Se ee ees 124 © 
PRATER S 2 os wc atons sate eee poe eee 37 
Bamimnti22 SS ee ee 15 
2 ENSE: S38 Gr 6, aa i a =a ei cp ced NEE 91 
1 P5607 0 O Aielaeln Pe ekee NS EES ALT ile Seale arte tia 44 
New: Orleans .) > 2-252 so cee ee ee oe 75 
SMUT a ara, SSS ee ear ee ee 148 
PaO TES nt 5 ects 2 aso oto te ee ea 78 
Righaul o-26 20 Sea eS Bee es ee A ee 109 ~ 
DCH A MR “AA ben faethe Yi tae CS Wiel He ene ama! 176 
WAPVEIBT ise So SCE ee oe ee ee eh a Fes) 
Ree S Se i kde bene ee we 26 
TEA a SEIS SSN eae Ee ese eg Bae 15 
RISER ATR Re od bn oo eee aes 42 
Rimet at tony coo n5 2 Lk ete 2 ese oa Von eae 
emma 2.2 ys OS oes ee a ee ean, 
RnR AN te ee te ae eS ae ae eae te ees 
MAR 280 Ses Soo an ae oe eee eae 
Minor Points—Canada RSE TIE) ARS AUS ahs 5 Be ae 
Minor Points—United States......._.._..-....- 863 

tals: 228 ab 22 oo Fe sey is Beet: Sepak sere oe 4,568 


TABLE SHOWING THE NUMBER OF CARS OF EACH VARIETY 
IN 1895, 1896, 1897, 1898, AND 1899. 


VARIETIES— 1895. 
AS Sedna eee IS weld oat nmnl Be ep am ia ee ee 1,187 
NS Co 2 in 526d mca re aie em ese a os eh PL 1,289 
RN ee iron wits we ee eee ny ee eae 1,010 
Petre AO ETUNCK: ss. 55. oe ceca see ee eee 465 
EUROS soa eee St ae ere eee es 162 
SRROTUOR oe tee. te p ia mine win ES cae ee es 180 
PEODION > soon meals ata os a a aed eeee eee os Soe 105 
RRETIGOS 55 oie ree ame med a oe lr ee me age as 13 
UR = Rt ahs are ohne ie wpe nmign = alg tres ew St Se 
EMC IEELIROSS | id <5 2 ts > SR oe Nats pens ens md ha 5 
OO os ey Sel rae BOS Sree ECB SSP Rye 
ESI nat > a ae yh 
vars Mot Paported: 3-32 ok eee ee outa 


Opis’ 2 5c00Spu- tow ae Beminger s Sea oar ad ee ae 


1896. 


1897, 
1,007 1,410 
-1,055 


471 


532 


4,052 


1896. 
1,624 


‘TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 15 


_-—=—”s« REPORTS BY COMMITTEES. 


Foreign Consular Service. 


ys et et ee 


The following report of Committee on Foreign Consular Service was 
ibmitted by the chairman, Epwarp Berwick, of Monterey: 


At the Fresno convention a year ago a committee was appointed to endeavor to 
obtain from the Government the use of the foreign consular services to give us the 
nformation regarding fruit that we so much needed from the different countries, as to 
he prospective crops in foreign countries, as to the stocks in hand, as to the whole 
ndition of the markets there, and as to the price fluctuations; in fact, give us all 
stails that they possibly could, both by letter and by wire, through certain months of 
e year. The committee consisted of Emory E. Smith, Edward F. Adams, and myself. 
pee _ We sent details of what we wanted to the Secretary of Agriculture and to the Secretary 
of State. We also sent to the National Farmers’ Convention at Fort Worth, Texas, 
asking them to aid us by applying also on behalf of the Eastern growers for similar 
information, and they did so through Mr. Stowe, their secretary. We have had much 
discouragement in the earlier part of this correspondence. In the first place our letters 
to our Government were said to have been lost,—those sent to the office of the Agricul- 
: tural: Department and to the Department of State. Your committee had then to 
write those lengthy epistles once more. We then heard there was small hope for us. 
aA will read a few of the letters. 
Patapee 5 : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF i opioenores. 
OFFICE OF SECRETARY, 
WASHINGTON, D. C., December 28, 1898. 

Mp. EDWARD BERWICK, Monterey, Cal. : 

a DEAR Sir : I have your letter of the 22d. Our records do not show the receipt of your previous 
- communication on the subject of foreign consular service, and I have no recollection of seeing it- 
_ Imay state, however, that 1 wrote yesterday to Mr. John M. Stahl, in reply toa similar inquiry 
from him, and stated that in my opinion such consular reports would be of little value unless the 
- consuls could be in some way compensated for making them. I added that no appropriation is 
x made to this Department from which such compensation could be paid. 


SURE) 
: (Signed:) JAMES WILSON, 


eee Ls Secretary. 


as aE was not very much pleased on behali of the committee, and I wrote to President 
oe Biliciley and to Mr. John Hyde, statistician of the Bureau of Agriculture, whe promised 
us s something. His letter to me reads as follows: 


UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
DIVISION OF STATISTICS, 
: 2 Sa OPS : WASHINGTON, D. C., April 5, 1899. 
R. EDWARD BERWICK, Monterey, Cal.: 
_ Dear Sir: Replying to your letter of the 25th ultimo, I beg to state that a plan for the utiliza- 
tion of the services of the United States consuls in foreign countries, in the matter of reporting 
ae upon the condition as oe of the crops in the countries to which they are 


ra ss Very truly yours, 
~ a (Signed :) JOHN HYDE, 
- : Statistician. 


16 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


Then I wrote to him that the plan should not only be formulated bie 
operation, and I got a very curt reply indeed. _ Following i is Mr. Hyde’s letter: 


DIVISION OF STATISTICS, fp 
sists WasHINGToN, D. GC. » May 27, 

Mr. EpWarpD BERWICK, Monterey, Cal.: ; : 
Dear Sir: There are no further developments to report with regard to the 
tect proposition. As soon as anything definite is arranged.I will adyiee you, a 
Very truly yours, : 
(Signed :) JOHN HYDE, : 
Statist 


This is the last letter I had from Mr. Hyde. Then I applied to the See: 
State. I have a letter from the State Department, as follows: 2 


=e 
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WasHINGTO 

Epwarp Berwick, Esq., Monterey, Cal.: rey 
_ Dear Sir: [have received by reference from the ‘Precideut your letter to him of th 
instant, expressing your desire to obtain at specified times information of ihe condition 
crops and fluctuations in current prices of horticultural produce. 

In reply I have to say the Department of Agriculture collects through conti officers ec 
able information of the character of that desired by you and publishes it in the monthly 
of crop reports. It appears from your letter that you are already in communication with | 
Wilson, and itis believed that your request should properly be formulated by that De 
before the aid of the consular service is invoked in order that there may be no duplication 
information collected. This Department will be glad to have consular officers codperate wit 
Secretary of Agriculture, so far as they properly can, in collecting the information whi 


desire to obtain. : i 
Iam, sir, your obedient servant, 


(Signed:) DAVID J. HILL, “8 
Reba Secretar 
Mr. Wilson then came to the Coast and I wrote to him, addressing my y ete 
Palace Hotel, in an attempt to obtain an interview with Khas but I was not succe 
in that, for my letters did not reach him until he was learns for the East. | 
wrote to me saying he would have written to me appointing a time for the hea: 
this matter, but that my letter had arrived too late. I then wrote again to him, te 
him what we wanted; no reply came to me. I then wrote to President M 
again, again telling fies the state of affairs, and I got a reply from him—an 
reply. The President’s letter is as follows: ; 
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, so 16, 
Mr. Epwarp BERWICK, Monterey, Cal.: ee 
My DEAR Str: I beg leave to acknowledge your letter of recent date, and to state t 
meplent’ s direction it has been referred for the consideration of the Begretary. of State. ; 


Very truly yours, 
(Signed: Dia ateAcs PORTER, 


! Secretary to the Pres 
I then wrote to Mr. Wilson this letter: 


} MONTEREY, CAL:, November 6, 

Hon. JAMES WILSON, Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.: i 
Dean Sin: On receipt of your letter, dated ‘ Palace Hotel, S. F.,”’ I wrote you on bela 
fruit-growers of the State of California, reiterating their equeat for certain ine 
ously detailed to your department, and to that of the Secretary of State. 


As the seater clerks were too busy in your office to vouchsafe me SO. much 


business iti: dhet of President McKinley. us 
My letter to him of the 10th ultimo was referred to the Secretary of State, and on the 
Assistant Secretary D. J. Hill wrote me: “It is believed that your request should 


order that there may be no duplication of the information collected. This Departme t W 
glad to have consular officers cobperate with the Secretary of Agriculture,” etc., ete. Pa 
As I have been given to understand previously from Mr. John Hyde, that the difficulty 
get the adequate colperation of the consular service, I trust, now that the consent of the e ca 
sub-department is obtained, immediate action will be taken by your department. Near 
has elapsed since the request of the fruit-growers was presented to your office, andt 


Wile TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 1 


tion of plans, that Mr. Hyde promised does not require an eternity to effect. If any newspaper 
agitation is required to make manifest the popular desire in this matter, I can soon start it, as 
my fellow-committeemen, Mr. E. F. Adams, of the San Francisco ‘‘Chronicle,”’ Emory E. Smith, 


- and myself are all tolerably versed in journalism. I should like to use my pen to tell what your 


department has done for California, especially as I was one of the ‘‘mugwumps”’ who voted for 


_.MeKinley. 


. 


Requesting acknowledgment of this at an early date, I am, dear sir, 


Yours truly, 
(Signed:)) EDWARD BERWICK. 


I then got back this letter after writing that one. It is from Mr. Wilson himself: 


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, 


WASHINGTON, D. C., November 18, 1899. 
Mr. EDWARD BERWICK, Monterey, Cal.: 


DEAR Sir: I have your letter of November 6th, in which you charge us with want of business 
courtesy. The same letter, however, intimates that I have answered one communication from 
youand Mr. Hyde another. We make every effort to answer all letters received at this depart- 
ment, but the previous communication to which you refer failed to reach us, and for that 
sufficient reason was not attended to. 

If I remember rightly you wanted telegraphic reports from our consuls abroad regarding the 


- condition ofcrops. Permit me to say that this could be done, but it would require Congressional 


legislation and a heavy appropriation. Neither the State Department nor this Department has 
a dollar with which this telegraphing could be done. If it should please Congress to give us the 
money for that purpose, there will be no difficulty whatever about getting the desired reports by 
-eable. If consular reports by mail are what you desire, probably this Department could arrange 
with the State Department to have such reports furnished. 

Iam informed by Mr. Hyde that he wrote you last spring that it was then too late to take action 
to be of any use in this crop year, but that the subject would be considered this winter. If you 
will now submit a brief statement of just what your plan is, I will give it careful consideration 
and personal attention and advise you of my decision in the matter. 


Respectfully, 
(Signed:) JAMES WILSON, 


Secretary. 


Mr. Wilson says he will give this his personal attention if you, gentlemen, will formu- 
late in some concise shape just what you want done, and will then authorize a committee 


- to continue its correspondence and try to obtain the information desired. As to the 
_ details he asks for, we sent full details as to what we wanted. We named the countries, 


‘specified the fruits, and detailed the times when the information was required by letter 


and when it was required by wire—those matters were all detailed to them. But as to 


how this matter was to be disseminated, Mr. Righter suggested handing the informa- 
tion to the Associated Press, and I believe that would be a good plan. 

The committee would recommend that a committee be appointed to carry on this 
work, and send the details to Mr. Wilson again. It would also recommend that bodies 
such as the Fresno Raisin-Growers’ Association, and any other fruit exchanges, also 
send their desires in this matter, urging that the work be done. Your committee also 
recommends that your Congressmen and Senators be requested to secure the appro- 


_ priation necessary to remunerate the foreign consuls and to pay for the use of the cable 


when required. 


Mr. RIGHTER. I move that the report be received and the com- 
mittee continued. | 


Motion carried. 
Nicaragua Canal, 


Mr. BERWICK. I also happen to be the chairman of the Committee 
on the Nicaragua Canal, and will make the report on behalf of that 
committee: 

We have not had a very successful year as a canal committee. Mr. 
Gordon of Fresno and as Sprague of — ae are the other mem- 
(2—BH 


Fe 
Sue 
et 


18 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OP THEY eg 


encouragement. We all felt very sanguine that there was no ne 
for much more effort on our part, after the Oregon had such trou 
about getting around the Cape, thinking that the Government wo 
take it to heart and try to get the mien through the canal, ib 


committee wrote to the Secretary of State to know what was e 
condition 2 affairs Pisses: the Walker Commission. The ee 


engineer called Hane and by Col. Haynes of the Engineers. be 
said that the canal was a sie feasible proposition; ie 4 


canal proposed in previous one but one equal to all our largest shines 
and with locks big enough to raise and lower them as it might bes ie . 
this $124,000,000. | 

Mr. JOHNSTON. I believe Mr. Haynes put the figure twenty 
cent “ae 


to stay the canal as long as Sanieis at the. instigation of the rane 
tion companies. We recommend that you urge on your Congressmen, 
and your different parties also, to go to work at once and cone 4 


in forbidding any other nation to build that canal and yet refusing to 
build it themselves. You know that there have been commission 
appointed and surveys made for the last fifteen years, and many of 
know also that the height of the mountain chain there is Be 


Sai ova canal, but the elevation of the proposed Nicaragua canal 
the body of water available are the two chief points that recomn | 
that as being the site for the canal. We believe that the Americ 
people want this canal and that the transportation companies opp se 
and we want you to urge it wherever you have any influence 2 
ask you to use all your influence to make Congress take imme diate 
action and prepare the necessary power to forward the necess: 
scheme to furnish bonds for the building of that canal by the Un 
States government direct without the intervention of any comy 
whatever. I will say further that there is no taxation neede V 
all. I told ex-Speaker Reed myself, in the Del Monte, that we ic 
not want any appropriation; that we simply wanted bonds to COV 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. if 


the cost of the canal to be issued as the work was done, and that 
the tolls from that canal would amply cover the interest and also 
provide a sinking fund which would pay for those bonds when they 
became due. It was simply giving the nation credit for the benefit of 
the whole nation and the world. 

Mr. RIGHTER. I will move the adoption of the recommendations 
made by the chairman of that committee, and that the committee be 
continued. : 


Carried. | 
Organization of Fruit-Growers’ Associations. 


The Executive Committee appointed by the Convention of Fruit- 
- Growers, held at Sacramento, May 23, 1899, submitted the following 
report: 


- Your committee beg leave to make the following report: 
This committee was appointed through the following action of the aforesaid 
- convention: 


z SACRAMENTO, May 23, 1899. 
To the Chairman and Members of the Fruit-Growers’ Convention: 


GENTLEMEN: We, your committee appointed to consider all resolutions and to report a plan of 
organization, beg to submit the following report: 

The committee met immediately after the recess taken by the convention and organized by the 
election of Alexander Gordon of Fresno as chairman, and H. P. Stabler of Yuba City as secretary. 
Several gentlemen appeared before the committee with plans for organization, which plans were 
considered in detail by the committee. 

Resolved, That we advise the immediate organization oi a Fruit Growers’ Association of North- 
ern California. The purposes of this organization shall be to establish a car line or any other 
meéthod of securing transportation relief and facilitate the profitable marketing of our fresh and 
dried deciduous fruit. 

ALEXANDER GORDON, Chairman. 
F, A. CHADBOURNE. 

W. R. FOUNTAIN. 

W. E. LOVDAL. 

H. P. STABLER. 


The report was adopted and an executive committee was constituted as follows: 
W. R. Fountain, Newcastle; Fred C. Miles, Penryn; E. I. Galvin, Sacramento; W. BE. 
Lovdal, Sacramento; F. A. Chadbourne, Suisun; and R. D. Stephens, Sacramento. 

The committee organized by electing R. D. Stephens, chairman, F. C. Miles, SecEieee 
and H. I. Galvin, treasurer. 

The committee immediately entered upon the discharge of the duty for which it was 
created, and after thorough consideration unanimously adopted the following plan: 
The Executive Committee chosen by the recent convention of fruit-growers of Califor- 
nia to perfect such a plan of organization as should result in promoting their best inter- 
ests and securing their release from the present method of fruit transportation and 
marketing that threatens to involve them in disastrous loss, if not financial ruin, has 
given most careful consideration to the whole subject and has reached this unanimous 
conclusion: 

_First—That the fruit-growers organize for mutual protection; 

Second—That the fruit-growers form a corporation for the purpose of owning and 
operating a refrigerator car line; 

Third—That the fruit-growers organize for the purpose of marketing their fruits an 
- ruit products; 

Fourth—In doing which they will be allowed the utmost liberty in the disposal of 
their fruit, either by selling for spot cash at landing point, through our own representa- 
tive in the large cities, or through Messrs. Porter or Earl, or any agent whom the 
grower or shipper designates. 

For the purpose of organizing the growers the committee held meetings in all the 

fruit sections of the Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys and in all other fruit sections 


ms eran Mae a Ba 
, % ie 
~ a . i - < 
20 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS ar; ee 


in the central and northern part of the State. The first meeting was hele ain 
on June 18th, followed by meetings at Suisun and Vacaville. = © 
The pperttee did all in its power to gin about an organization ae 


ken 


of many who are given to understand that any oh on their Re 
- aid the movement being made to organize might result in materially im 
personal interests. Crop mortgages prevent independent action on the ?p 
mortgagees. Cong asics made to ernes in the way of rebate on commission 


Selfishness on the part of many who desire to sell to one or the other of the gre 
mission and shipping organizations, the opportunity for which was offered thro 


their SRatnets: Such men would say, ‘‘ You are all right, go Shear we are wit : 
but we Baye a lot of fruit we wish to sell f. 0. b., and are now negotiating to th 


in the past. In the mean time, however, do not for the pa rae es 
bring about a perfect and complete organization of the State.”’ 


Respectfully submitted. - eee 
R. D. STEPHEN 


The report was, on motion, adopted. 


Report of Committee on Transportation. 


tion Ropbinied: by the Fruit-Growers’ Convention, held at Fr 
November, 1898, as follows: 


Your committee most respectfully beg leave to make the following re 
following correspondence is submitted: ; 
San Francisco, May 1 
Mr. WILLIAM Srroute, Freight Traffic Manager Southern Pacific Company: 

Dear Str: The Committee on Transportation appointed at the last Frui G 

Jonvention held a meeting on Tuesday of this week and selected us as a comm 

wait upon you and ascertain what aid the Southern Pacific Company is 
extend to the fruit-growers of the State in their desire to secure cheaper facili 
marketing their fruit. Knowing that it is to the interest of the Southern Pac: 
pany to encourage the fruit industry of California, and appreciating the fac 
company has made many concessions to growers in the past, in furnishing nt 
cars and an expedited train service and in other ways, we feel no hesitancy at 
time in beseeching the company to grant us its assurance of assistance in the 
crisis. Our committee is instructed to submit its report to a general conver 
fruit-growers to be held in Sacramento on Tuesday of next week, and in order 
may be able to place the whole matter before the growers as accurately and 
gently as possible, we respectfully request you to inform us on the following poin 

First—Is the Southern Pacific Company prevented by any arrangements with 
Fruit-Growers’ Express and the Continental Fruit Express from permitting any : YI 
peting line of refrigerator cars from entering California and competing for ship! I 
of green fruit, and if not, will the company extend to one or more Eastern ref 
lines the same facilities enjoyed by the existing lines for pethines yusiness i 
tory? 3 


A ¢ < bs 4 ‘~- 
ge The po ee ee, be ee) a es i ee ee ae 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. _ 21 


: + a Second—Ii the fruit-growers of California decide to establish an independent car line 
53 and perfect an organization for that purpose, will the Southern Pacific haul their cars 
and on what terms and conditions? 
_  Third—Will the Southern Pacific supply a proper and sufficient equipment of ven- 
__tilator cars? 
oe Fourth—li the company has not a sufficient equipment of ventilator cars to meet the ~ 
wants of the growers, will it build or conyert cars for that purpose? 
ae Fifth—It so, how soon will the company undertake to furnish the cars required? 
-_ Sizth—What is the Southern Pacific willing to do in the direction of inaugurating an 
- expedited ventilator train service through Ogden or more easterly points? 
a Seventh—Will the company haul and give the same service and time to ventilator 
m _ cars that has been given to refrigerator cars? 
_ By answering these questions so that we may be able to present the facts in writing 
' to the conyention, you will confer a great favor on the fruit-growers of California. 
- Very = eee 
R. D. STEPHENS, 
Chairman. 
The Railroad’s Reply. 
San Francisco, May 20, 1899. 


= Mr. R. D. STEPHENS, Chairman of Committee on Transpor tation, Fruit-Growers’ Associa- 
tion, Sacramento, Cal.: 

_ Dear Sie: Answering your letter of the 18th instant, handed me by you in person, 

oc “eee oral explanations pertaining thereto, I beg to remind you that it has always been 


E Pe the least practicable cost, and it cannot be charged that this company was party to 


_ the introduction or deyelopment of the refrigerator plan of transportation, except in so 
‘far as we yielded to the representations and experience of the shippers and growers, 
accepting, as a matter of course, their verdict in favor of the refrigerator system. 
_ For several years the fruit was moved in ventilated fruit-cars, built by the carriers 
_ especially for the traffic and furnished without expense to those who desired to load 
them. Shippers were not satisfied with the ventilated car, whether run on regular 
freight trains or in special fast fruit trains, and insisted that only under refrigeration 
- could California’s fruit be successfully placed in Eastern markets. Still, there were 
some who, in convention and in person, expressed themselves as certain that the 
_ transportation in ventilated cars could be made successful, and, in express compliance 
- with these representations, this company added to its ventilator equipment seven 
hundred double-walled, paper-lined, ventilated fruit-cars, which embodied all the 
: - yaluable points in construction and ventilating appliances developed by experience. 
These cars were, as always before, placed at shippers’ disposal without charge, but the 
- issue proved that the business for which they were built, in expectation of handling it, 
- moved instead in refrigerators. 
_ For this company it was a costly experiment, made in sincere effort to’ meet the 
_ views of the fruit-growers under promise in convention that the cars would be used. 
_ Our yentilator equipment so provided has consequently since been converted into box- 
_ cars, and there is no changed condition with respect to transportation in ventilated 
. cars that would warrant the carriers in restoring at great expense the equipment which 
_ has failed to stand the test of experience and been discarded by the erowey and 
“Z ~ shippers. 
= The present refrigerator system of transportation is one developed by the demands 
= of the shippers. It began in 1888 with a call for refrigerators operated by a line that 
Z would undertake to handle the fruit through from point of shipment to destination 
_ under ice, and the initial refrigerator line in the traffic, started at the instance of 
_ growers upon the same general plan as at present in vogue, except that the charges for 
_ refrigeration at that time were from $60 to $120 per car higher than now. Owing to 
. adverse reasons, financial or commercial, but with which this company was in no wise 
_ concerned, one refrigerator company after another dropped out of the traffic, this com- 
oe pany ee year to year aiming to furnish the refrigerator car, the utility of which was 
_ proved by its general use on the part of growers. Last year three lines of refrigerator 
cars were provided, but out of some 4,700 cars of fruit shipped all but a hundred or so 


22 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


and engage from the F rat Express and Continental Fruit Express all the reigerators 
needed for this traffic. a 
Our response to your first and second questions consequently i is that we have con- 
tracted for all the refrigerator cars necessary for the deciduous-fruit traffic. e 
to accept special lines of refrigerators in endeavor to satisfy the various and often con-| 
flicting interests of those promoting individual car lines we would have so many 
refrigerators on the line and under such variety of auspices that serious ‘confusion - 3 
would develop, together with a multitude of cars for which there would be no loads. — 
We have already had experience of this kind, and from the highly perishable nature of 
the traffic and large quantity to move must know in advance from what source cars are — is 
obtainable, having reasonable assurance of load, and ‘of adequate facilities for icing and 
care of the refrigeration on the way to every destination, diversions in transit notwith- 
standing. Refrigeration is a matter of method and expense apart from the cone 
tion; it involves foresight and organization, and arrangements which cannot be left to 
marata: mre 
As to the remaining questions your letter recites, new ventilated cars could not bet 
obtained at this late date, and we have none of the ventilated fruit-cars formerly in 
the service, except such as are necessary for our strictly local business. We cannot — 
take them out of the local and put them into the through traffic, because in the through — 
they would make two, possibly three, trips in the season, whereas in the local traffic 
they make many trips and are used continuously. To “eles them out of that service 
would cripple it unwarrantably to the injury of the California grower of fruits and 
vegetables desiring to have his product handled short distances in suitable cars, which | 
to the grower is quite as important in its way as is the trouser movement. Sarees 
I trust you will pardon the observation that this company’s relation to the refrig- am 
erator lines i is the same now as in previous seasons. The company has no interest in 
either line, and the cars engaged for the service are those which the shippers haye 
designated by their use of them, the others being dropped merely because of non-use; — 
hence we deprecate the present agitation because of its tendency needlessly to depress _ 
orchard values, in a year which otherwise affords every prospect of attracting to Cali- 
fornia fruit interests the favorable attention of the nation, giving the State a new 
impetus toward increased prosperity. 
Very respectfully yours, 


WM. SPROULE. a 
Upon motion, the report of the Committee on Transportation was 
received, with thanks to the committee. 


DISCUSSION. 


N. W. MOTHERAL. In Kings County we were ready to cooperate 
and hold up the price and quality of our products. We cannot go ~ 
alone though, because you have got so many more pounds than we have; ae 
however, we have got enough to forever keep any other organization 
from ee complete; but we are willing to codperate with you. I have — 
some few prunes of my own, but we have one of the finest and largest a 
prune orchards in that county that there is in the State, and we produce e 
a large quantity of fruit per acre. You claim that we do not make as 
good fruit as you haye, but we do not believe that. We know onething: | 
we can make more pounds than you have. We cannot do anything by 
permanent organization unless we go with you, and we are perfectly 
willing to do that; but I do not believe you can get a green and dried 


frit combination in one until you have done it step by step. It will ‘ 
take time. poe. 


ee es 
$ rtd ae ee 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 23 


_ Pror. CHILDS. We have attempted to form a Pacific Coast Cured 
_ Fruit Association, and have been working a long time in that direction. 
I have been one of the directors in that association, and we have spent 
a good deal of time trying to organize. We have copied the Raisin- 
_ Growers’ contract with a few modifications. I shall present it to you in 
_ the morning. I believe that before we leave here we can organize. I 
know now from information we haye from various parts of the State, 
ey that they are ready to join with us. We shall have with us to-morrow 
__ the men who have done so much to organize the raisin-growers of Fresno. 
I think we have a pretty good outline of the plan, and we have given 
it much attention for some weeks and I will present it to-morrow when 
we can discuss it. 
; Pror. FOWLER. I was through all of this matter pertaining to the 
_ _ raisin-growers’ organization in Fresno County and was one of those who 
_ suffered from the conditions that prevailed—those conditions that 
___ brought the raisin-growers right to the Sheriff’s office, and the Sheriff 
to their farms. I know some of the difficulties that occurred in the 
matter of organization, and I know that men do not like to organize 
until forced, because they have some sort of a reason for staying out. 
Mr. Stephens mentioned in his report some of the reasons for staying 
out of it. You cannot do anything with an organization until you get 
a large percentage of the growers so they can safely make the organiza- 
_ tion a success. The raisin-growers did not get to that point until the 
_ Sheriff and the banks forced them there. There was a mortgage upon 
nearly every raisin farm in the country; there were very few men without 
a mortgage in Fresno County; the result of it was, they saw that it came 
from a shortsighted business policy; through organization those men 
saw the light that was coming, as you men now see it in the prune 
business. There are men in this building who work along for years 
__— urging organization, but when you get together, organize as far as forty 
or fifty per cent. The raisin-growers could not get more than that; they 
could not get ninety per cent at the outset, which was what they thought 
they needed. They told them that they could not control the crop un- 
less they had more than seventy-five per cent of the product that was 
produced. So year after year passed by until we got right at the place ~ 
- where the Sheriff was at the door. The banks would not lend any 
3 more money; they said, if you don’t come into these organizations, 
we will not lend you any more money, and the growers all came in and | 
they made it-a success. I was in the office of the treasurer of the asso- 
ciation down there the other day, and Mr. White informed me that they 
__ passed over two millions of dollars to the growers of raisins, and that 
_ has paid these men well for the labor. What is the result? You can- 
4 not hire a piece of raisin land to-day—land that went begging a few 
-s yearsago. The growers are taking better care of the vineyards now. 
The real estate has improved, and Fresno has commenced a new growth. 


es 


ney me % 
<1 


24 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


do. As stated by the reports, this year France has only prod 
about 25,000,000 pounds of prunes; last year, she produced abot 
85,000,000 pounds, but she has produced crops larger than that. In 
this State, we have got a larger crop than ever before, but it is 1 
a phenomenal crop by any means. You will wonder why 
is not a sale for prunes; but that is the condition. The only 
to solve this proposition is by organization. Petty jealousies bet: 
districts and men must be laid aside, and you must organize fo: 
benefit of business. It is going to take labor and a good deal of pa 
and much judgment and magnificent management at the head of : 
but then, it can be done. I am hopeful, because it is my plese 


tions that all the men say, “We want to organize.” Why Wee 
have organizations so that one district may support another. ‘Then 
business will build up. This is the grandest fruit ae on the 


the Raisin-Growers’ Association. It may be that there are very gre 
differences between the raisin and the prune industry as to the distr ) 
tion of the growing crop throughout the whole coast. _ It may be th 
there are other very great conditions which will make it difficult for 
to succeed on the same lines as the raisin-growers. We may not be qu 
satisfied to risk the failure of the whole to secure just this particu 
form of organization. I desire that we should exercise caution in co 
sidering the subject; my own experience in the matter of organizati 1 
teaches me and convinces me that every form of organization ay 
lives is of advantage to those who organize and compose it. 
been the history of organization in this State. But we must advan 
step by step, making it more powerful each day, until it arrives at the 
Ca i sagen If we cannot do it all at once, let us do what we = 


ie s of Me sieakion. it is in the Santa Clara Valley, ieee we ares 8 
going to increase our crops, and which I believe to be the prettiest spot 
on the face of the earth; but we need a great deal of education here, an 
we were very anxious vs have this convention here for that purpose. 
have been at different mechnees in the southern part of the State since it Es 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 25 


‘a it was a dead community; at that time, we were away ahead of it. 
‘When we are organized thoroughly here, our lands will increase in 
__yalue and our country in population. We can get money for five and 
six per cent. That shows progress. While I brag about this valley, I 
cannot brag as much about our business men, and the other day it was 
suggested to me by one of them who possesses a great amount of energy 
that we should get some of them together, and take them down to Los 
_ Angeles or up to Seattle, along the coast, on an excursion and let them 
see how they do business and acquaint them with the energetic methods 
of the business men of those places. oe 
JOHN MARKLEY. I agree upon the advantages that come by 
‘organization. I was once connected with the California Fruit Exchange. 
At that time, we did not all agree as to what should be done or as to 
how it should be done. I did not agree with all of the management. 
My idea was then that we should be organized in separate and distinct 
_~ organizations—a distinct organization for the prune men, another for 
the peach men, and another for the raisin men, without regard to any 
pe headquarters; but I will accept now any plan of organization that 
_ possesses good business methods. I do not believe that you can get too 
strong or too well posted a man at the head of it. I believe we should 
_ have a ten thousand dollar manif he has got a ten thousand dollar 
ability, and I think it would take a ten thousand dollar man to organize 
the prune men of Santa Clara. When we do get to the organization, we 
ought to organize right; we ought to get down to the bottom of it. I 
think we ought to get a list of the fruit-growers of the State and what 
_ they own and grow, and then we can organize a permanent organization. 
_ We could then say that we own this land, and that we have the ability 
to sell the products of it, but we should not go to a man who has not got 
a tree or an acre of land. As matters now stand, somebody who has no 
- interest in land, or who don’t own any fruit, fixes the prices for us. 
I hope the fruit men will get together before we leave here and devise 
some plan by which the prune men of the State can be brought here at 
any time and unite with these people, and if there is any such organiza- 
___ tion as suits us, we will accept it; and put strong men at the head of 
__it—men who can go to the banks and get money if they want it, because 
money is a strong feature. I think this can be done. I travel all over 
the State of California, and have been in many places recently, and con-_ 
sider myself pretty well acquainted with the fruit industry, and the 
outlook for it. Some two or three years ago, I was in Fresno, and it 
- was awfully dull, owing to the unorganized condition of the raisin-growers 
and the poor methods used by them at that time. I know of my own 
__ observation and my own individual knowledge that it was largely the 
a Sheriff and banker that organized those people. Recently, I heard a 
A 2 man in Fresno say that he could sell his vineyard for $250 an acre, and 


26 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


kicking about he cost of xaseiente This same man who stated tha 2 
his land was now worth $250-an acre was kicking about the cost of or- o 
ganization. He said Mr. Kearney got $500 a month,and I said [think 
he is worth $5,000 a month if he can organize fellows like youare. In the #32 
last six months I have seen, in many counties where prunes are raised, _ 
men who offered to codperate, and I think it would be a good plan toget 
a list of those prune men and of the possible amount they can produce. _ 
Some of them told me that they would come to the convention and talk — 3 : 
the matter over. I think it is better that all sections of the country 
should know what is being done here, and that we should get a rep- 
resentative from every county at a convention to be held here later, eg 
and then the representatives of those different counties could go back to a 
their homes with the necessary papers for the growers to sign. I trust — a 
we will get together and take some action in that behalf. aS | Bs 
Mr. GORDON. It is a mistake to hire cheap men in an institution 
of the kind we propose. We pay our president $500 a month, and there __ 
are a good many small, narrow, contracted men kicking at that salary. — 
A man said the other day, who was not in the association, “ Look at the — 
salary you are paying Kearney—$500 a month.” I said, “ My dearsir, © 
you have forty or fifty acres of raisins there, and the association has < 
been worth forty or fifty thousand dollars to you in the last year or so. 
That salary that we pay Mr. Kearney costs about ten cents an acre to __ 
the raisin-growers of Fresno County.” And‘ told this man that itwas 
just such men as he who are ruining this country and sending it to 
destruction. It don’t make any odds whether you pay $500 amonthor 
$1,000, if you get the right man in the right place, and I don’t believe 
you will find any more trouble in handling the prune organizationthan _ 
we have found in handling our raisin organization. I once felt as — 
though I was opposed to organization, believing that I could conduct os 
my own business, but I soon learned that I could not do it. I grew 
raisins when they were worth 5 cents and when prunes were worth 12 3 
cents. We have now an organization of raisin-growers in Fresno County, J 
and prunes are worth 24 cents and raisins are worth 7 and 8 cents. Before <a 
we organized in Fresno, there were thousands of tons of raisins sold _ 
right in Fresno County for $5 a ton less than ground barley was selling + 
for. Barley sold for $30. This was on account of disorganization. 
Since we organized, and had one management and guaranteed the trade 
certain prices, raisins have gone up to $100 a ton, and barley has gone — = 
down to $15. Now, regarding the prune iene: if I understand the he 
situation, it will ne be for long that you can get 24 cents, because the — eee 
area is increasing, and you will see that prunes will go down unless you — ee a 
organize, and you will be where the raisin-growers were a few years ago Ba 
Recess until to-morrow at 9:30 a. M. m 


” 


iy, 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 27 


~ 


EACOND DAY —_W HDNHSDAY: 


DECEMBER 137TH, 1899. 


_ Torics For THE Day: Establishing a Free Public Market for the Sale of 


Perishable Products; 
Organization and Cooperation among Producers; 
Foreign Competition. 


At 9:30 a. M., President Cooper called the convention to order. 


THE FREE PUBLIC MARKET PROJECT. 


Epwarp F. Apams, of Wrights, submitted the following report on 


establishing a free public market for the sale of perishable products, etc.: 


Mr. PRESIDENT, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: In the autumn of 1895 a commission firm 
in San Francisco cheated a widow of Santa Cruz County out of 15 cents.on a box of 
grapes, and the widow kicked. When reproached for its act, the firm set up in defense 
that it was the custom of the trade; it said they all did it. When the young man—a 
son of the widow—inquired of certain firms to which he was referred by the offending 
salesman, the statement was confirmed. The young man was informed that the pro- 
ceeding was perfectly regular, and some surprise was indicated that any fruit-grower— 
and especially a widow—should attempt to kick up a disturbance about a little thing 


like that. Out of that transaction grew the great free market controversy. 


This widow of Santa Cruz County was plucky, and, considering that an insignificant 
transaction, in which the facts could be definitely proven, brought up all the essential 


- facts in an important matter, would have been disposed to tackle any single firm in the 
_ business, but when it came to a fight with the entire commission trade she considered 


herself outclassed, and therefore appealed to the local Grange of which she—and, as it 
happened, myself—was a member. The Grange did not feel quite sure of itself, but, 
trusting in the Lord, put a stone in its sling and went out to meet Goliath. It was a 
pretty fight, but the Grange catapult lacked power; it biffed the giant good, but did not 
fetch him. The Lord seemed to be on the side of the heavy artillery. The press of the 


State, however, took up the question and freely agitated it; in due time a mass conven- 
tion was called by the State Board of Horticulture, which met in San Francisco, on 


April 6, 1895. Subsequently another mass convention was duly called, this time at 
the suggestion of the Board of State Harbor Commissioners, and met in San Francisco, 
February 23, 1898. Both these conventions, after thorough discussion, adopted certain 
definite instructions to the committees which they created to take charge of the move- 
ment. The resolutions of the two conventions were identical in principle and corre- 
sponded substantially with the propositions originally laid down by Highland Grange. 
I was the chairman of the committee originally appointed by Highland Grange to take 
up the case of the widow, and have also been chairman of the committees appointed by 
the conventions, and as such am ina position to say, and do say, that not one move- 
ment has been made in the matter by any one purporting to favor the Free Market 
except in literal compliance with the instructions of large conventions of producers. 
For whatever has been done, therefure, the producers of the State, as represented in 


almost every organized body of them, are directly responsible, and not any individual. 


The producers of the State have used every effort possible to obtain the Free Market in 


28 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE t 


San Francisco, short of putting up the money to pay the cost of educating thi 

There they draw the line. It is evidently their opinion that a free market is a m rket 
which does not cost them anything. Largely as a result of the first convention the lay 
now on our ee book was enacted and approved on March 29, 1897. ‘The 


missioners by mandamus proceedings or for malfeasance in office. “But —— } 
The facts apo the nee Market are these: _ Perishable products pinion: 


market—are and have been ror years sold upon the Sm te either by prod 
commission men, without charge for space. Any one can see that Free Marke 
any dayin the year. I am informed that from two thirds to three fourths oft i 
ables arriving by water are now sold on this Free Market provided by the State. Thi 
market is totally unregulated; the business is carried on in great confusion and wit 
Sai la inconvenience ue all parties. ie methods i in vogue offer excellent + Opes 


(ee by some of them. . 
On the other side of East Street and a short distance from the ic where 


eau company in iia the Steamship Soaupane or its officers are interested, or a: ee 
rate which is managed by the agents of the Steamship Company—Messrs. co ; 
Perkins & Co, It is all one concern in some way; I don’t know how. ae 
The instructions of the two conventions to their committees were to induce. t 
Harbor Commission to remove the coal yard and repair shops of the Steamship Com- 
pany from these blocks of State property and extend railroad tracks and sheds over the 
whole, upon the condition that the railroads should make those blocks the regu ar 
terminal for perishable products arriving in the city, which would then be mainly ‘sold 
in the sheds on the blocks, just as the perishables arriving by water are already sold in — 
the sheds over the wharyes where they are delivered. It was then proposed that there 
should be official supervision over the sales both on the blocks and on the wharves, ies 
under such regulations as would reduce the possibility of fraud to a minimum; permit e: 
convenient and effective inspection to be made; allow accurate records to be) kept of 
market conditions, available after six o’clock ioe day to shippers, and generally put — 
the marketing of perishable products in San Francisco on a sound, businesslike, — 
common-sense basis. Regulations intended to accomplish this end were drafted by the 
producers’ committee and were adopted verbatim by the Board of State Harbor 
Commissioners and haye been printed at the expense of the harbor fund. They can be Eo) 
seen by the curious at any time. They are all that exists of the Free Market. They ee s 
are not enforced even upon the wharves. 
The advantage from all this, common to all producers, was oe “regulation” of jhe 
market, surrounding transactions with all possible safeguards against fraud by pl 
ducers or salesmen, and furnishing immediate and daily information of the state te) 
market for the guidance of intending shippers. at 
Against this there would be to the shippers by river and bay the disadvantage th 
whereas they now have in the San Francisco market a very great advantage over s 
pers by rail, in that they have earlier delivery to the best place for selling in th 
with no arax age charges or transportation of tender fruit over rough cobblestone 
with such a concentration of products at one center as insures the largest concour of 
buyers, if the law now on the statute books were enforced they would be deprived of 
this adv antage of position over the shippers by rail, but all would be on an equality. 
The majority of actual shippers by water do not converse fluently in the American la 
guage nor habitually subscribe to the ‘‘ Melican”’ papers, and probably never heard 
the Free Market. The large land-owners understand the situation perfectly, and while 
some of them profess to favor the Free Market, and none of them say anything agal 
it, they have never been known to sit up nights coving means ve pane i 1 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 29 


They all certainly recognize the value of regulation and information, and as good citi- 
zens must favor good government and square dealing. 

‘The special advantage to the shippers by rail, comprising the producers of about one 
third of the total pee bables and probably more than one half of the more tender 

fruits, would be: 
1. Equal advantage of location : as compared with shippers by water. 
2. Equal participation in the competition of buyers who principally congregate at 
- the Free Market on the wharves where the bulk of the product is now sold. 

3. Delivery averaging probably two hours earlier than now. 

4. Avoidance of injury to tender fruits by bounding over the rough cobblestone pave- 
‘ments of San Francisco, which must be seen to be appreciated. 

_ 5, The saving, upon the basis of an arithmetical computation on the basis of the per- 
abies delivered by rail in San Francisco in 1896, at the rates usually charged for 
-drayage in that city, of over $80,000 per annum, less drayage on whatever residue might 
not be actually disposed of in the market ane so be hauled to commission houses or 
storage. -This cash saving of course will increase with growth of population and trade. 

_ The law of the State and the ‘‘ Regulations of the Free Market,’’ duly adopted by the 
- Board of State Harbor Commissioners, require all these things to bedone. Asa matter 
of fact none of them are done. . 
The attempt to carry out this program brings us athwart three important interests: 
ee: 1. The railroads, which meant at first only the Southern Pacific Company, but now 
means both them and the Santa Fe so far as the latter brings perishables to the city. 
No conference has ever been had with the Santa Fe officials. If all other perishables 
are delivered to the Free Market the Santa Fe will. only be too anxious to deliver theirs 
_ also. The first step taken by the producers’ committee was to ask whether or not the 
oe _ Southern Pacific Company would make the Free Market its regular terminal for perish- 
ables. The answer was yes, upon two conditions, which were: first, that they should 
be at liberty to load cars there, in which perishables had been delivered; and, second, 
“that they should be at liberty to use the tracks and sheds for the delivery of general 
merchandise at seasons when the room was not required for the delivery of perishables. 
. Otherwise not, as the delivery of perishables at that point would, of itself and without 
some compensating advantage, be a serious expense which the company would refuse 
- toassume. It happens that there is no possible objection to either of these things, but 
+ on the contrary they are earnestly desired by the wholesale merchants of San Francisco, 
-- who had, in writing, as individuals, and by their Chamber of Commerce, petitioned for 
it, before the Free Market agitation began. The producers’ committee, therefore, agreed 
_ that, so far as they could control matters, it was a ‘‘ whack,” and the agitation has pro- 
- ceeded upon the understanding between the committee and the Southern Pacific Com- 
pany that perishables should be delivered to the Free Market as a regular terminal upon 
the conditions stated. They certainly will never be delivered there without extra charge 
on any other conditions. 
Between the company and the committee, however, there is one point which remains 
unsettled, because neither party has ever been ready to bring it to an issue. The blocks ~ 
- upon which it is proposed that the State shall extend its railroad tracks for the use of 
the Free Market, now pay the State rent aggregating $600 per month, which is much 
‘less than they are worth—or $7,200 per annum. It was the secret intention of the 
committee that the railroad tracks used for this delivery of perishables and other 
: merchandise should yield a rent, to be paid by the companies using them, equal to that 
-_ now received from the steamship company. It was the secret intention of the railroad 
company to get the use of the tracks, at least for perishables, without rent, their claim 
__. being that the use of the tracks rent free would be no more than an offset for the extra 
: be cost of delivering cars there, as compared with the cost of delivering them at King and 
Townsend Streets, a mile and a halfaway. The committee did not force this issue in 
1896, when these discussions were had, because they were of the opinion that if forced 
at that time the company would buck, ne have nothing further to do with the matter, 
because, so far as the committee could see, it was about a toss up with the malpesd 
which way it went. Since that time conditions have so changed that I am personally 
& of the opinion that the railroad will pay the $7,200 per year rent, rather than not have 
. it go. I may be mistaken. There will certainly be a hard fight before the Harbor 


my t 


30 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


Commission before it is settled. If the railroads do not pay it the Haven Con 
missioners must increase the tolls on perishables to cover it, as the Harbor needs th ore 
rentals. Ifit were taxed, in tolls on the perishables, it would be about 3 cents per ton, 
which I, for one, would rather pay than lose the market. It would amount, for me, te 
about 15 cents a year. I think it good business anyway to pay $7, 200 a year to have the 
railroad deliver the stuff rather than to pay $80,000 a year to have draymen bump it 
over cobblestones. But Iam in favor of making the railroads pay it, and I think they ~ ca 
will. It is the one unsettled point between the railroads and the committee. Both are — 
taking their chances. It is my understanding that the Southern Pacific Company now — 
strongly favors the Free Market and is willing to take its chance on having to pay rent : 
for track room, and that an alliance, said by their enemies to be unholy, exists between | 
the producers of perishables, the wholesale merchants of San Francisco, and the — 
Southern Pacific Company to bring it about. ry 
The next interest to be dealt with was the commission merchants. They aia’ 
want a free chance to sell produce on State property if they were going to be watched. x 
They would rather pay rent and be allowed to deal with widows and others in their 
own way. They have always opposed the movement all they could, but their opposi- | 
tion has never amounted to anything. In fact, ithas helped rather than hindered. It | 
is fair, however, to state their grounds of opposition. These were: 
1. Adams wanted to be superintendent of the market. This was mortifying to me, sf 
for I had thought myself of Harbor Commissioner caliber at least, but I consoled — 
myself with reflecting that whoever tried to serve the public must expect to endure 
mortification. 
2. That Adams was in the employ of the ‘‘railroad.’”” There was nothing mone 
ing about that, for the railroad is said to be good pay, which is more than can be said ~ 
of my employers of record, the mass convention of producers. No other coum of 
opposition were ever set up by the commission merchants. 
But the trouble was this didn’t seem to prove much. There was no allegation that 

I should not make a good superintendent if I wanted to get up at two o’clock every 
morning and go down to the wharf for the sake of a petty office, or that the railroad 
was not contributing to a worthy object if it was paying me to help the producers get 
what they said they wanted. It was, therefore, unnecessary to deny either of these 
things, and as the commission merchants rested their case there their argument gave no 
trouble. Their actual fighting consisted in getting one or two trade journals to inti- 
mate or allege the above-mentioned things about me, and to send one or two of their 
number to the proprietor of a journal for which I sometimes write, to induce him to 
fire me on those grounds. One man, not a commission merchant, was silly enough to © 
write a letter warning the newspaper man against me. He wrote from this city and is 
probably here to-day. These things contributed somewhat to the joy of the newspaper — 
office, but otherwise it did not count. The commission men monkeyed in a feeble way 
with one or two members of the Legislature, who told us they might have to go out 
doors when Free Market matters were up, as they might lose a vote or two next time 
if they voted for us, and they did not want to vote against us. They went out all 
right. They or somebody else got a lawyer to appear before legislative committees 
against us. He said his aunt, or grandmother, or somebody had an. interest in some — 
river land, and he appeared for her. Maybe he did, but nobody believed it. Thefresh 
fruit commission merchants are rather a trifling lot and their opposition harms nobody. 
The draying interests were against the Free Market, and include some infiuenaee 
men who doubtless exerted their pull against us, but I never knew of it. 
The interests which have really thus far prevented the execution of the law are | 
represented by Messrs. Goodall, Perkins & Co. To that concern and no other influence 
is due the fact that the shippers of perishables by rail are denied equal privileges’on the 
waterfront with shippers by water. The reason is, that they do not wish to remove 
their repair shops and coal yard; and thus far they have succeeded in making the 
shippers by rail pay $80,000 a year in order that they may save the cost of moving and 
doubtless paying a higher rental. There are many places which will accommoda 
them; there is no place except the State blocks which they occupy where there can 
a Free Market for the shippers of perishable products by rail. 
The bill introduced in the Legislature of 1897 had no promotion, or next to none. 


oe 
we. 


Pern CS pa 
% < Re 
a 

' 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. BS 


was introduced and left to take its chances, because there was no money to pay the 
expenses of any one to go to Sacramento, and no one would go and pay his own 
expenses. Milton S. Green, then representing Goodall, Perkins & Co. at Sacramento, 
as he himself told me, got the bill amended in committee so as to make it a little ~ 


obscure and, as he thought, to keep his people from being moved off the blocks which 
_ they were occupying. He did not succeed in killing the bill, nor did he, in fact, mate- 


rially injure it, for it cannot be put into execution at all except by taking the blocks in 
question. 

T have no reason to suppose that Senator Perkins’ has ever taken part in the contest; 
in fact, I am of the opinion that if I had the least confidence in my backing, or if he had 
reason to have any such confidence, I could sit down with him and in an hour, by a fair 
method of give and take, remove the opposition of that firm; but so long as neither he 
nor I have any confidence that the people who asked the members of our committee to 


_Tepresent them in this matter, would take the least trouble in the world to sustain us, 


such a conference would be a roaring farce, in which neither the Senator nor myself 


would engage. Itis essential to a trade that both parties have something to deliver. 


The fighting has been done by the Senator’s wicked partners. Captain Goodall, who 
directed the fight, is dead, and my lips are sealed as to the methods employed. The 
most influential agents employed, as I was informed by members of the Legislature, 
and believe, were the chairman and secretary of the Republican State Central Com- 


- mitttee, who were maintaining party headquarters in Sacramento. The last fight took 


place over a bill introduced in the last Legislature to compel the Board of State Harbor 
Commissioners to carry out the law of 1897. The bill was introduced in the House of 
Representatives by Hon. George G. Radcliffe, of Santa Cruz County, a Republican, and 
passed with but two dissenting votes. In the Senate it was introduced by Hon. B. F. 
Langford, of San Joaquin County, a Democrat, but failed in that house on final passage, 
although at one stage or another it received the votes of more than enough Senators to 
enact it into law. Had that bill passed it would have been impossible for the Board 
of State Harbor Commissioners to avoid doing what it is equally their duty to do 
now, and before any law was enacted. Before the law was enacted, however, it was 
wholly within the discretion of the Harbor Commissioners. Now it is not. When 
they delay to execute a plain law they violate their oath of office. 

The bill before the last Legislature had promotion as follows: W. L. Overheiser, of 
Stockton, a Past Master of the State Grange, spent two or three weeks in Sacramento in 


‘the interest of the bill. His expenses, amounting to not quite $50, were paid by the 


State Grange of California. I visited Sacramento three times to appear before 


committees. My expenses, except transportation, which I procured from the railroad 


company, were paid by myself. I presume the bill had promotion from the represent- 
atives of the Southern Pacific Company, but I know nothing about it, for I never saw a 
political manager or agent of that company to know him as such in my life. 

The records of the committee of producers show the vote of every member of the 
Legislature on the bill at all times when the roll was called. The same, of course, can 
be found in the journals of the houses. 

The shippers of perishable products by rail, and also, I should add, those who ship 
by the Pacific Coast Steamship Company, and who now pay $80,000 a year for unneces- 
sary drayage, can have the Free Market established beyond peradventure by simply 
pledging the candidates for the Legislature, of all parties—for it is of course not a party — 
question—when they come up for nomination next summer. The proper education of 


_the people, including, especially, new members of the Legislature, requires a small 


expenditure for printing and postage; and another small sum, probably $200 or $250, is 
required to pay the expenses of an open and avowed agent of the producers during the 
session of the Legislature to expose lies. I will undertake to find a good man for $5 a 
day, and he pay his own expenses. No, I don’t mean myself. I won’t go at any price. 


Bey suppose $500 judiciously expended would assure the market. There simply needs the 


evidence which such an expenditure, with the interrogation of candidates, would give, 
that the producers of perishable products demand justice for themselves and the equal 
execution of the laws. If the producers prefer to pay $80,000 a year for ever and ever 
rather than to pay once for all a few hundred dollars to explain their case to the general 
public and so get relief, it is a curious social fact, but otherwise of no interest to me. 


-_ 


32 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


There is some evidence that this is so. The last State Fruit-Growers’ Convention, 
a full ee nes of the facts, and a full discussion and understanding there 


little money cin and there for promoting that end. The coi if I remember, — 
passed unanimously, but when the time came to raise money I was told by Professor __ 
Fowler—for I was not present—that the crowd nearly smashed the doors down inits 
struggles to get out. I did not doubt it, for I had seen conventions do that very thing ~ 
before. ; 2 eee ae 

For myself, I have served the public in this matter because various conventions of __ 
producers have asked me to. I did it cheerfully, faithfully, and to the best of my ability. __ 
The pleasure of so doing cost me $50 or $60 a year in expenses for some years, but [have <i 
had a lot of fun out of it and no worry and am perfectly satisfied. But I haye had all 
the fun I want, and if the growers wish to be represented further they must get some 4 
one else. As a fruit-grower my interests in the matter are insignificant, and no possible ~ 2 
gain during my expectation of life would pay my expenses in the matter for a single © ee aa 
year. Asa citizen of California, I am heartily in favor of all that tends to square deal- _ 2 
ing and good goverriment, and shall always, I trust, be ready to be helpful in public = 
measures to that end. Except from such motives I don’t care a rap he ee there i is = 
ever a Free Market or not, and never did. ; ee 


Vote of Thanks. : aes a 


Pror. CHILDS. I move that the Committee on the Free Market os E. 
discharged* and the thanks of this convention be tendered to Mr. Adams ~ i 
for his efforts, and that a committee of three be appointed to examine 
the paper and bring the salient points before the convention. = 

Motion carried. 


Appointment of Committee. 


The Chair appointed Wm. Johnston, Edward Berwick, and Will A. 
Coulter on said committee. 


CO-OPERATION IN MARKETING PACIFIC COAST ie 
DRIED FRUIT. : Jaen 


ADDREss BY PROF. C. W. CHILDS, or San Joss. 


LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: President McKinley, in his annual message, 
says that ‘“‘Combinations of capital organized into trusts to control the 
- conditions of trade among our citizens, to stifle competition, limit produc- ae 
tion, and determine the prices of products used and consumed by the __ 
Deoolé, are justly provoking public discussion and should early claim ae 
the attention of Congress.” foe 

The recent United States Supreme Court’s decision in the pipe- jamie ts 
case indicates what verdicts may be expected from the courts aes ete . 
the bad features of trusts. No economic tendency is at present receiving 


so much attention from our political economists as is the unmistakable § 


drift toward concentration of capital in corporate bodies, commonly — oe 


*An inadvertence: the committee being the creation of a distinct body, the report was : 


made by request. 


: TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS CONVENTION. 33 


own as trusts. All of these writers find good and bad features in 
ese various trusts. 
The: horticulturists of California have been forming combinations for 
mutual profit and protection, and they have tried to eliminate the bad 
eatures which prevail in such corporations as the Standard Oil Trust. 
These fruit corporations have generally been of great public value, as 
Shey are working in the interest of producer, consumer, and mer- 
shant by lessening some of the expenses and decreasing some of the 
riction that are usually incident to individual competition. 
ae shall endeavor to explain why we are attempting to form a Pacific 
a Coast Fruit Association to handle all the cured prunes, apricots, and 
peaches on this Coast. This is a very ambitious scheme, as deciduous 
fruits are produced in patches of country scattered throughout the region 
from Arizona to British Columbia, and from the Rocky Mountains to the 
Pacific Ocean; however, Northern California, Oregon, and Washington 
‘produce about seven eighths of this fruit. The principal markets for 
these products are far away, and transportation facilities are very unsat- 
-isfactory. At present a great majority of the fruit-growers try to sell 
their crops as early as possible for cash, fruit delivered f. 0. b.; some 
ee to Hastern dealers. This indiscriminate competition of indi- 
- vidual growers has made the market price of cured fruit so fluctuating 
~ and uncertain that many dealers in this product, both in California and 
2 2 in the Hast, have lost heavily. In Santa Clara County eighty per cent 
of the fruit-dealers, outside of the “Association,” have become bankrupt. 
For various reasons, well known to the orchardists, the cost of producing 
cured fruit is greater now than it was five years ago, while the price of 
-Gured fruit has steadily declined, so that at the present time ee 
-is unprofitable in many Wcities: 
_ Fruit-raising is the most important producing interest in Santa Clara 
“Valley, and much of the best land is now planted in fruit trees. Of 
late years we have planted mortgages quite as rapidly as trees and 
much more effectively. -With the decline in prices of cured fruit real 
estate has decreased in value, probably fifty per cent within five years, — 
and yet we are told that we are too prosperous to fully realize the great 
“necessity of codperative effort in handling our cured products. 
_ During the decade just closing—1890 to 1900—several codperative 
‘ associations have been formed in Santa Clara Valley. Some of these, the 
West Side, Campbell, Berryessa, Willows, and Hast Side, dry, pack, and 
market the fruit of their stockholders; while the others, known as the 
santa Clara County Fruit Exchange and the Santa Clara County Fruit 
2 oe receive the cured product, grade, pack, and sell it. in order to 


n 1895 ce a common, agency, lengua as. ethe California Fruit Agency, 
pee 3—sH 


pars | NT QI eee ee ae, Se ae 
' ; x 4 * : i. “2 be See eee PES i 
34 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


through which the Exchange, Caninhell West Side, and East Side” 


organizations have since that time made their sales. The spirit eee 
distrust, which is the farmer’s devil, cast its malign influence. over the — 
other organizations, and also over the individual fruit-growers throughout — 


the valley, and the agency failed to accomplish its sls measure ee 


SUCCESS. 


These associations, though not realizing ae hopes of their founders, _ 2 4 


have been of great value to all the fruit-growers in this valley. Many, “ 3 


through selfish motives, have kept out of these associations, and thus * e: 
have injured themselves as well as those who paid for cooperative work. — — 
The associations will market this year about one fifth of the cured — 


prunes produced in this county. It would seem from this statement 
that four fifths of the prune-growers in Santa Clara County are still 


enjoying all the profits and the pleasures that pertain to sumer : 4 


blessedness. 

We are also confronted with the condition of over -production, or, 
perhaps, better stated as under-consumption. Last year the people of 
the United States consumed about 75,000,000 pounds of cured prunes, 
and we shipped to foreign countries about 10,000,000 pounds. Under 
favorable circumstances Santa Clara County will produce about 
100,000,000 pounds of cured prunes next year, and the rest of the 


Pacific Coast about the same amount. Evidently we must induce the 


people of the United States to eat more prunes, and we must also 


expand the foreign market for the same, or we must lessen the produc- 


tion of this fruit. What shall we do to be saved from bankruptcy? 
As it seems to be impossible to induce more than one seventh of the 
prune-growers in this county to sell through the Dried Fruit Agency, 


‘and as it is necessary to form a combination of at least seventy-five © 
per cent of the prune-growers on this Coast, in order to fix a minimum ~ 


price and to regulate the distribution of cured prunes, an attempt is— 
now being made to form a combination of fruit-growers upon a broader 


basis than that of any existing fruit organization. This combination _ 


will be known as the Pacific Coast Fruit Association, and it proposes 


to grade, pack, inspect, and market all the cured prunes, and pose ea 
all the cured peaches and apricots produced on this Coast. This asso- — 
ciation is modeled upon the plan. of the Raisin-Growers’ Association, — a 


aad 


an 


24 


* ‘ 

ae ¥ 4 of » 

et hat nae es A? 
Me 2 hin oo) aes oe 


oO 4 


and the contract which the prune-growers must sign is, in the main, - 


a copy of the raisin-growers’ contract. This document has been pre- 


pared by legal experts, who have tried to draught a contract that would 


be acceptable to all parties and legally invulnerable. The following is A 


a short analysis of its principal clauses: 

1. The grower, in consideration of certain promises made by the: aSS0- 
ciation, agrees to transfer to the association an ine videds one bwenaa 
interest in the prune crop grown on his land A. D. 1900. aoe 


= 


Si A 


ae 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 35 


2. The grower promises to pick and cure said prunes at his own 


~ expense and deliver them to some packing-house, which he may select, 


but said packing-hotse must be approved by the association. The 


__ grower also agrees that his fruit may be mingled and sold with other 
fruits of like grade and quality. | 


8. The association, in consideration of such transfer of prunes, agrees 


~ to inspect, grade, pack, and sell the whole crop, under its own trade- 
mark and guarantee of grade and quality, as speedily as possible, and 


at a rate not lower than the minimum price fixed by the association. 
4. The association also agrees to store said prunes, or cause the same 


i to be stored, in proper warehouses, and to insure them; to employ all 


necessary Managers, inspectors, agents, and other employés; to give | 
each grower a warehouse receipt for his prunes, which receipt shall state 


- that said prunes are held subject to the terms of agreement; that the 


‘proceeds thereof will be paid to the grower, or his assigns, on the return 
of such receipt, and that said receipt may be assigned by indorsement 


os thereon, subject to the conditions of this contract; that the whole of 
_ said fruit shall be accounted for and the net proceeds paid to the grower 
or his assigns, payments being made from time to time, as the proceeds 


of sales are received. | 

5. It is specially agreed that all expenses incurred for inspecting, 
grading, packing, insuring, storing, selling, and salaries of employés 
shall be paid by the grower out of the proceeds of ‘sales. - 

6. If at any time there shall be a controversy between the grower or 
his assigns and the association, either party, on complaint to the board 


_- of directors, may have the same submitted to a board of three arbi- 


TOM ig ee 


= 7 
eS 


ele a 


es S buy earlier in the season and keep a larger stock in store. If protected 
., by an established association price, which cannot be lowered during the 


trators, one to be selected by the grower, one by the board of directors, 
and the third to be selected by the two so chosen; and the controversy 
must be adjusted by this arbitration board. The award must be made 
in writing, and shall be final. 

The association proposes to transact its business with and through the 


existing channels of trade; consequently, the various unions, associations, 


and packing-houses now dealing in cured fruit will sign a packers’ con- 

tract, similar to the growers’, and proceed with their business. 
Provisions may be made in the by-laws for limiting the liabilities of 

stockholders, electing the directors, requiring the officers to give proper 


bonds, and for other safeguards and necessities. 

_ The founders of the Pacific Coast Fruit Association hope and believe 
that this organization will be of great value to producer, packer, and 
- consumer. By fixing a minimum price for cured fruit the speculative 
element in buying and selling fruit will be eliminated and this business 


put upon a stablefoundation. Eastern and foreign merchants will then ~ 


36 


year, these dealers will make especial efforts to increase their alee me 
eured fruit. By having under one control all, or nearly all, of the cured 
fruit on this Coast, a more economical and a much more systematic plan 


of advertising would be inaugurated by the producers. Agents could bere ze 
employed in every EKastern State and in foreign countries to distribute — 
fruit in small packages, to teach people how to cook it, and thus assist 


in creating a taste and desire for our cured fruit. Granges and farmers’ 


clubs could be induced to handle a large amount of fruit. Through — 
these various agencies, properly directed as they would be by the 
association, the consumption of cured fruit could be quadrupled in a. 
very short time.: The board of directors would employ a first-class 
- business man as general manager. He would cause the fruit to be 
distributed in such a manner as not to glut any market and yet keep all — 


‘fully supplied. He could obtain the cheapest possible rates of trans- 


portation, and he would probably be able to have the present unequal, “ 
unfair rebates abolished. As another result of the concentration of 
fruit, the manager, or the individual grower, could readily obtain money 
to carry on business at a very low rate of interest, probably at six per 


cent or even less. The manager would undoubtedly have every facility _ é 


at his command for obtaining just such accurate information as is 
needed in managing the fruit business. Frequent consular reports 


would be at his service, for he would be the representative ofa great and 


influential body of people. - We now have each year a large amount of 
small and usually defective prunes, which ought not to be put upon fhe 


market as cured fruit. All prunes which are graded above one hundred 
to the pound, and perhaps all above ninety to the pound, ought to be 


treated as a by-product. If all of this defective fruit is controlled by 


this association, it may be crushed, pressed into blocks, and used for 
hog feed, for which purpose it is worth, at least, a cent a pound. Other 
ways and means will be devised for utilizing all fruit products that are 
now wasted or sold at a loss. 


In short, if this association is organized, it means to the producer : 


less friction, less worry, less expense, and greater profits; to the con- 


sumer, cheaper and better fruit; to the packer, a larger and more satis- __ 
factory business. Shall we organize? Not while the senseless notion — 
prevails that a price may be fixed for our fruit and a market found for pe 
all of it, by getting the grower to sign an agreement not to sell fruit 


below a certain price, and then allow him to handle and sell it himself. 
In closing I quote a paragraph from the “ Modern Farmer,’ < by 
E. F. Adams: : 


“As these pages are being printed, there is in progress a more arene . 


tious codperative effort than I have known of elsewhere, in connection 


with marketing. This is nothing less than the organization of a Pacific 
Coast Prune Association, whose object is to combine under one head all oie 


yy 


1s 4 ‘ 
tee 1% “i g : 
yee A ty en ee 


i 
Pew act 


he 


dies ay 
rn ane 


‘TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 37 


the cured fruit societies now existing, and all individuals engaged in 
the production of prunes on the Pacific Coast. The organization is 
similar to the Raisin Association, and includes similar contracts with 
the private packers, who are understood to be favorable to it, and with- 
out whose cooperation it could not at present succeed. Whether it 
can succeed with their aid is quite doubtful, as the prune-growers are 
_widely scattered over a large area, and it will be contrary to all experi- 
ence if they can be induced to sign the necessary contracts without a 
long and expensive canvass. So far as California is concerned, whose 
people are coming to be fairly well educated in cooperation, this pro- 
posal is not visionary, although it may not succeed. It will be strange 
if the people of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho shall be found willing, 
without previous instruction or experience in codperation, to at once 
proceed to the exercise of this highest development of the art.” 


_ ADVANTAGES OF ORGANIZATION AND CO-OPERATION. 


By A. H. NAFTZGER, or Los ANGELES. 


Mr. Presipent, LapIes AND GENTLEMEN: If we get the sentiment of 
_ this meeting as it developed in the discussion yesterday, and the inter- 
est manifested this morning, we are ready, not so much to argue the 
_ question, as to undertake to carry into effect the propositions that have 
been stated and the conclusions that are before you. However, I 
assume that you will not cgunt it out of order if I traverse some ~of 
_ the questions, even, that have already been touched upon since the 
opening of this question. So much has been’ said upon the subject of 
_ the advantages of organization that nothing more than a general state- 
ment can possibly be necessary along this line. There are, however, 
some very salient points; there are some advantages that ought to 
appeal to the man whose business interests are involved in fruit- 
growing, and I propose as hurriedly as possible to touch upon a few of 
these. Something has been said already about the preparation or 
curing of fruit. It is my opinion that nothing will be more conducive 
_to uniformity of grade and high class of growing and preparation than 
an organization that will disseminate the proper methods. We have 
_found in organizations to which I happen to belong that we can intro- 
_ duce and bring into practice methods of careful handling, grading, and 
packing through an organization as it cannot and will not be done 
under any other method, and that goods are well packed and crated 
nd marketed with satisfaction. The next item is that of economy. 
Business organization will introduce economy and will make a saving; 
u will oY ee es for less money. I shall say something 
0 In buying your supplies in large quantities, 


38 ‘OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE = ee — 


you will buy them, as you very well under fore for much less money. 
It is too well known for me to state here, that a large business can be 
conducted at a much less percentage of cost than a small one, and as 
consequently, by. uniting, these large interests will introduce economy 
at every stage of the business. Two or three days ago I met a gentle- 
man whom I had known for several years; I had not met him for — 
several months, and I said, “ How does the battle go with you?” And . 
he said, “First rate.” He said he had been up north in the raisin 
business, and told me he had some certain percentage of the crops to 
handle, and that his profit was about $75 a car. I am not saying 
anything against the raisin organization, for I think it is an important 
factor, and that it has made wonderful strides in the right direction, — 
but I wondered why when yesterday some gentleman from Fresno was 
talking about the benefits of the raisin association, and how they were 
able to borrow money, and so forth, | wondered why they did not get 
that $75 a car and not borrow money at all for the ranch. If the other ~— 
man had $75 a car profit to lose, why didn’t.the grower get that $75. I 
_-will show you that the association can do business cheaper than any 
one else in the business, because of the volume of its business. I will 

say something about that later on. 

As to our own business, as I am asked to speak on the subject of 
citrus fruits, I will say this to you: At this juncture, it costs us to 
operate, everything included, all of the expenses, all telegrams, all 
agencies, and auction expenses, and everything pertaining to the market- 
ing of the fruit, on an average of three per cent on the gross earnings. | 
Before we began operating in the orange business, the price for packing __ 
was never less than 85 cents a box, and usually from 40 to 50 cents. 
The percentage for handling the business was never less than tenon the 
gross sold. We have reduced it so that it is from 24 to 23 cents a box 
better than before, and the total cost of mar keting is about three per cent. 
on the gross sold as against ten per cent. This is simply because we 
have a large business, and the benefits going to the organization instead 
of to the middle man or the speculator. Another benefit is reducing the a 
competition. One other word along that line: Under the system that _ 
prevailed before we organized, the commission man or middle man pitted _ 
every grower against every other grower; it is impossible, of course, to — 
entirely eliminate competition; that goes without saying, because every __ 
producer of fruits is to a certain extent a competitor of every other 
producer of the same class of fruits; but under the commission system, 
the buyer and speculator pits every grower against every other individ- ; 
ual grower. He goes to Jones and says, “Jones, I can get Smith’s fruit 
so much lower than you sell it,” and then goes back to Smith and says - i 
to Mr. Smith, “I can get Jones’s fruit so much lower than you will sell 
it,” and in this way he puts each of them in competition with the other. | “i : 


eas. TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 39 


As to the conditions we are confronted with in the orange business on 


_ the subject of commissions: The orange business had been done entirely 
- upon the commission or consignment basis. I shall never forget an inci- 
_ dent in which a man came to my office and wanted to borrow $100, and 
as he was very good, I said he could have the money, and then he drew 
_out a bill and said, “I want to settle this bill.” I looked at it, and 
found that it was an account of sale of his orange crop. He said he 

had turned over the entire crop to the commission man, delivering the 
fruit at the packing- -house, and they brought him out $93 in debt, and 
_ with that $100 he wished to pay off this indebtedness of $98. I asked 
_ him-if he had the statement showing to him that the fruit was sold, 


and he said no, and asked if he hadaright to know that. He said, ‘‘ My 


: wife is about crazy, and is afraid I am going to be sued, and I propable 


will be sued and I want to pay this bill,” so I loaned an the money. 
He had turned over his entire crop and $93 to get out of the hands of 


the commission man. Now I say that under an organized system, you 


reduce the competititon to the lowest possible terms; you eliminate that 
and the destructive features of it. The whole trend of modern econom- 
ics is toward the elimination of the individual, and toward unification 


of power for the purpose of eliminating this destructive competition, 


where every man is pitted against every other man. That is what we™ 


- want to do in an organization of fruit-growers. 


Another benefit, and that is, distribution. What we must have is a 
wider distribution of our fruits, and we must have a systematic and 
orderly distribution of it. This must be brought about by organization, 


- and inno other manner. There is another question right along with’ 


this, and that is mutual defense. I will say more about it later on. It 
is my belief that combination of nearly all, if not all, of the agencies by 
which our products are transported Hast would benefit all fruit-growers. 
As I see the situation among the green-fruit shippers of Northern Cali- 


_ fornia, we are at the mercy of two men. I do not say they are bad men, 


but God help the fruit-growers when they get to be bad men. I think 
that from the fact that you are at the mercy of two individuals, you 
ought to know that it istime to pit an organization against a combina- 


tion. It is time that the fruit-growers of California should stand in a 
- solid compact to meet a common enemy. I have not said a word about 


anybody being bad, but I say that it is a dangerous state of affairs when 


the industry of any community or of different communities is at the 
mercy of two or three or any small number of men. And you will not 
' get any relief for the mere asking or from sentimental grounds. Nobody 
$ _ is going to listen to any statement upon moral grounds. You will get 
_~ yelief in every line when you compel it, and no sooner; and you will 


a compel it when you control their tonnage and hold it en masse, for the ~ 


interests that belong to them. 


* 


40 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


2 


time-worn statement, “the way to resume is to resume” and “the way to. 


Now, as to the “how” of iotvonnoe and organization—that i is, a as Eafe a: 
the manner. We need not be dogmatic. By coe pa with the old on 


codperate is to codperate.” When the disposition is present among : mH 


the producers they will find a way to do it. JI remember very well when 
the orange-growers of Southern California undertook to organize. Ihad— 


- 


been all my life in another line of business, but had an orchard. = = 


coming into bearing and I interested myself because all the bide 
interest had been involved in it. We held a meeting and had as many — 
growers perhaps as are here to-day. Everybody wanted to know what, 
was to be done, and I admit that I knew less about it than any of them. oy 
But I remember of saying this, ‘‘Gentlemen, it is proposed here that we — 
appoint a committee of ley en men and make an organization of 
this thing, one that will take charge of the business and market 
our oranges for us.” Isaid further, ‘‘Gentlemen, this audience cannot _ 
select eleven men into which I am unwilling to put my crop and — 2 


have them pay the proceeds to me after they have paid the = : 


expenses of the organization.” Further, that if the orange-growers 
of Southern California don’t know enough to market oranges they 
had better sell their ranches to some one. who does know enough to 
attend to that part of it, for if you don’t, presently the other fellow will 
own your land. What I mean by that is, that if the prune-growers, 


about whom Professor Childs has been talking, would add the spirit of 


cooperation they would soon find themselves prosperous. If they are 
willing to cooperate I venture to say it would be possible to get them — 


- a eee Che 
ne | Hater 


‘together and select six or eight or ten men who would transact the ~~ 
business better than they transact it themselves. I was amused with 


what was said here yesterday about the salaries paid to leaders. I 


have drawn the best salary among the orange-growers myself, and — 
I can look complacently upon it. The showing that the gentle-— 
man made here yesterday reminds me of an incident where a com- — 


plaint was made against my salary, and I found, in summing the 
matter up, that it cost them 60 cents an acre to increase my salary. 
This complaint was made when there was a desire to have my salary 


increased. When you get a combination and a large volume of fruit, es 
the salary and that sort of thing are incomparable to the question 
of service. What has the payment of salary by the raisin-growers 


of Fresno got to do with the matter? It is the question of the 
rescue of an industry from insolvency or bankruptcy and placing it 
on a successful basis. The salary has little to do withit. As I said 
before, the organization will find its methods if the spirit is present. — 


a 


We must bring this organization about in the direct manner of give _ * 


and take, because no man can have his own way. He has got to a 
yield at this and at another point, and another man has eo é 


~ 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 41 


In my judgment an organization should be decisive as to its charac- 
‘ter. When we organized the orange-growers of Southern California 
we were confronted with the statement that the middle men or ship- 
‘pers or packers controlled the market, and I speak in no disrespect 
_. of them. We were confronted with the statement that they con- 
trolled the markets, and unless we employed them we would not 
be able to market our goods at all, and that they held the keys to 

_ the avenue through which the distribution should be made to the 
_ markets. We took the ground that nobody controls the markets but the 
~ man who controls the supply. Consequently, if we held the supply we 
would have ready access to the markets. We, therefore, at one sweep 
eliminated all the speculative features from the hand of the grower to 
the hand of the merchant in the market itself.- We left no ground 
_. whatever for a speculator to stand upon, so far as: our business"i3 con- 
cerned, and we have paid no tribute to any one—except the growers who 
~ refused to codperate with us have more or less hurt us and damaged us 
inthe market. But so far as the packers and speculators are concerned, 
__ they are no damage to us and no benefit to us one way or the other, as 
the grower puts his crop into other hands. I therefore take the ground 
that there is no reason why our products should pass through the 
hands of, and that we should pay tribute to, the speculators as an 
_ abstract proposition. There is no reason for it. We want organization 
at both ends of the line. Some one said something yesterday about 
widening the markets and increasing consumption by distributing the 
j _ fruits into all the markets of the world. Who is going to do that if 
__ the producers do not? You don’t think the speculators are going to do 
it. An organization at the other end of the line is the way to get new 
markets. The Southern California Fruit Exchange has the best organ- 
ization in the markets that was ever made in the orange business. 
_ Why I say that is this: We sell more fruit, of course, than any other 
___ four or five shippers of California oranges, and sell it- for more money 
than. any of them. I don’t hesitate to say that we sell our fruit in all 
_ the markets except the auction markets, where the fruit sells on the 
block for what it is. In all the other fruit markets of the United States 
___we sell our fruits for more money than any operator that ever shipped 
3 - fruit from California, and for less cost. Another thing as an evidence 
-_ of our thoroughness of our organization at the other end of the line: 
- Wesold oranges during last year from Victoria to Florida and from Los 
Angeles to Montreal; our sales amounted to $2,750,000, and we never 
lost one dollar in bad accounts. If Iam met with the statement that 
this is a phenomenal streak of luck, I will add that three seasons have 
passed, and $7,000,000 worth of business done, and only $866 lost in 
_bad accounts. I challenge the commercial world to beat it. It is 


42 _ OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE Sn 


organization that does it,and we have given attention to the pasties 
We have put into the markets intelligent men, who have no business _ 
but to serve us—no interest in anything but to take care of what we 
have committed to them. They are studying the credits and watching 
the business at every point, and we have, therefore, escaped joss by 
reason of that thing. 


One other thing, while I am talking about this organization at both 


ends of the line—it is this: My view of it is that California fruit- 


growers handling all the classes of California fruits should codperate 13 


not only in their several classes but generally. What I want to say, 


and what I think is not an absurd idea and not a dream, is that the 


time will come when, in these distributing centers—in the great markets 
of the Hast and in the very great cities of the East—we shall have a house. - 


that is the distributing center for California products of every class. 


There is no reason why, gentlemen, in my judgment, after a number of - 


years’ experience in managing a large business through the East with a ; 


large number of agencies under control, the oranges and the prunes and — 


the raisins and the dried fruits and lie honey and any other and all 
other products of the vine and tree of California should not be sold 
through the same agency in all the great markets of the country. Some 


one says that the orange men cannot sell prunes. Very well. Inall the 


markets we are, ourselves, obliged to have from two to fivemen. Why 
couldn’t one be a prune man, another an orange man, and another for 


dried fruit? How did the men we have learn? They all learned by 


experience, and I don’t see why we cannot have trained men in all 


these departments, and these agencies could be the central points. Why 


shouldn’t every dealer in Chicago know that there,on South Water Street, 
at number so and so, is the agency for California fruits and that there 
is no changing the colline price. Couldn’t this business be put on as 
steady a basis as iron or any other product? I would not combine 
at this end of the line. Let the prune men run their business at San 
José, the raisin men at Fresno, and the dried fruit men wherever 
they elect ts—all managing their own business at this end of the 
line, but under a common management in the East. That makes 


practical the reduction of the expenses to the minimum. It will re 


bring to us, gentlemen, a service in the marketing of our fruits 
that, in my judgment, nothing else can ever bring. How are you 
going to get prune markets unless you have got men in the markets 
talking prunes all the time? If you had a general market and 
each industry sharing in the rents and expenses of the general head- 
quarters, it would reduce the expenses. We are hoping to continue 


to make a little profit in this business. Everybody knows that with 


the increased product of our California orchards we are compelled to 
reduce the price of sale to a minimum. Some gentleman was telling — 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 43 


you-here yesterday about the values of our mountains of iron ore in 


& California, and you smiled when he elaborated on that subject. I think 


we ought to make in California the nails used in packing our fruit, also 
_ the paper that wraps it; we ought to own the stumpage from which the 
‘lumber is cut to make the boxes; and every part of it ought to be within 


F the cooperation of the fruit-growers of California. That is a practical 


business proposition, and nota dream. We have but a small concep- . 
tion of the extent of this business. When you get combined the dried 


a fruit, nut, orange, raisin, and prune industries, and then. forecast what 
a _ these industries are to be when this great country of ours is developed 
and the wants of the world are supplied as they will be, the volume of 


the business is vastiy beyond our comprehension. There is no question 
. but that we are to supply the vast population of the world. I do not 
_ think any of us have a conjecture of what we have to do in the Orient. 
_ Some one made a statement not long since that within two thousand 
miles of the Philippines is located half the population of the globe, and 


__-we are going to sell our products to the Philippines and the other part 


_ of the world.” We want the earth with the ribbon around it. I am not 
' talking politics; I don’t care about acquiring the islands or anything 
else, for that matter. 

In the paper submitted by Mr. Stephens yesterday he said the objector 
was always in the land. There are some others, however; the “smart 
alec” is here to stay. Nothing will cure him but the Sheriff with an 
execution in foreclosure. Another objection which I have heard about 
_ the impracticability of organization is because of the scattered con- 
dition of the growers. They say, “Away up there in a niche of the 
_ mountain a man has an orchard, and it is five miles to the next one and 
twelve miles from there to the packing-house, and they cannot stand 
the expense of hauling.” What is the consequence? The speculator 
comes and buys it. Who hauls the fruit? Why, the man who 
grew it hauled it and pays for the packing of it. The man who 
comes from San José and drives out and buys his fruit for a cent less is 
making a profit off you. The man who grows the fruit hires the livery 
team and pays all the expenses of the man buying it. Why couldn’t 
you have an organization right here doing that? Alla man has to do 
when he has packed and cured his fruit in compliance with the rules of 
the association regarding grades and standard, is.to send it to the 
association, and that is the last he sees of it or hears about it until he 
gets a deck for the amount of the sale of that fruit. The grower can 
know absolutely that he will get what is coming to him after the cost of 
the organization is deducted, and no more or no less. 

There is another point on organization: It must be on an equal 
Pi basis—no privileged characters. Itis a level proposition, where every 
man shares alike i in the benefits and the burdens of that business and 


44 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


shares alike in the expensesof it. Itrustthis convention will enlarge upon — ge 
. this idea. Iam glad to see the prune men trying to organize. I wish we © 
could get our ideas large enough to cover all these interests in the same 
sort of a compact. It is perfectly practical. Then we will be able to 
take care of ourselves. We will not be able to build railroads, but — 
there will not be another fellow getting his freights cheaper than we do. © 
All we can ask is that we be placed on a basis level with every other 
man and that there are no privileged characters. I believe we have an : 
excellent future, but I believe we have to conserve our interests eacee : 
unite them. This method will not exactly suit every one; we will | 

always have the “kicker” with us. But we have got to take the : 
conditions as we find them and work them out to the best accomplish- == 
ment. We have got to take the thing as.good organization brings it - 
about, and I believe we will succeed. I thank you for your attention. 


Vote of Thanks. 


JOHN MARKLEY. I move that the thanks of the convention abge: . = 
extended to Mr. Naftzger for the splendid manner in which he has site a 
sented this matter to us. = 

Carried by a rising vote. 


DISCUSSION ON UNITY OF ACTION. 


JOHN MARKLEY, or Sonoma. I believe unity of action is what is es: 
needed. I am a prune-grower, and I believe that if we succeed we have. 
got to unite and reduce our business to a business system and have it 
managed by competent business men. I have had some experience in - 
the resolutions passed by Fruit-Growers’ Conventions, and I must say I 
have not much respect for them. -Therefore, I believe to have success, oe 
something more tangible is needed. In San Francisco once, the Fruit- 
Growers’ Convention passed resolutions to create a California Fruit a 
Exchange. The convention named the officers and I was one of them, — 
but gave us no money to work with. We managed it for about a year, 
and at the end of that time the board of directors raised $600, which 
did not pay for the money we had been out, and we had to quit business. 
At Fresno the convention appointed. Mr. Adams to do certain things, ee 
and. suggested that he be given $50. They proceeded’ to raise this 
amount by subscription down there, and got but $4 for him to carry aes 
out his instructions with. You cannot expect to perfect any proposed 
organization without money to work on. It is well enough to pass — 
resolutions, but it takes capital to put them into effect. The prune- 
growers ought to come together where they can quietly and thoroughly oe 
discuss this matter and form an organization on a business basis—one ~ Je 
representing the people from all sections of the ge Ee Then iE want a 


TWENTY- FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS CONVENTION. 45 


see thorough asics men at the head of it. But first I Srould want 
Et0 ‘gee gold coin enough put up to pay the expenses. Resolutions are 
a “nice enough, but it takes money to make a thing of that kind move. 
You have got to have the necessary coin. If such an organization can 
be formed I am willing to join and put up my crop if it is put on a 
‘business basis, but I will not go in on resolutions for the fun of the ~ 
thing. I want coin and business men at the head of it. There are 
some things absolutely necessary that some of the people in this county | 
‘do not understand. To get the advantages of the system you have got 
to haye warehouses; in many places in California there are no ware- 
houses, and they will have to be built; the State will have to be can- 
__vassed and subscriptions would have to come in. You have got to have 
_ coin raised by these subscriptions to pay the expenses. I am ready to 
join such a codperation and am willing to pay my share of the money, 
but I want to see the money put up to insure me that the business oe 
be done and that it will be conducted in a business way. 
_ A.R. SPRAGUE, or Los Anceres. Iam very glad indeed that this 
- matter is coming up in this way. We have spent time enough, I think, 
upon general discussion as to whether it was wise to codperate or not. 
_ Ido not think there is any one who needs to be convinced upon that 
one question. The main question is: What is the best way to secure a 
- successful codperation? Now, it is not a light thing to organize even | 
the prune industry of the Pacific Coast, and I see no reason why we 
_ shouldn’t organize the dried-fruit interest at the same time. As a gen- 
p eral. thing, in other parts of the State, a man who raises prunes also 
raises ‘peaches and sometimes apricots. If you organize simply the 
_ prune interest you will have to go over the same ground again for the © 
_ other interests, and it will cost nearly three times as much. If you try 
to organize the whole interest ‘you will be able to get more of the whole 
. community. It is a large proposition—larger than many think for— 
but you will get elements of strength in the whole that you will not get — 
in the separate interests. We must understand that this is a difficult 
~ matter, where the prejudices of all the growers have to be overcome and 
where the individualism is so strong, and that has to be in the collected 
interest. A matter of that sort has to be taken up in detail—in the 
game manner that a political campaign has’to be taken up. Some 
arrangement for so difficult a canvass has to be made; this cannot be 
done without cost. The idea that you must have seventy-five per cent 
to start with is absurd. You should take advantage of every step. If 
you get thirty per cent you will be successful, and if you get fifty per 
cent: you will be successful in a larger way. Every step gained is a 
__ step toward success. I believe that before we leave this convention we 
should determine upon those certain things—that we shall start for- 
ward to success, and that we must have no such thing as fail. We 


46 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


must try and succeed in organizing codperation for the dried-fruit 


interest, at least, of the Pacific Coast—in the largest majority which 
we can possibly secure. If we shall gather together a sufficient per- __ 


centage so that we may be able to absolutely control the price, as it — 


has been done in other interests, well and good. If we cannot get as ; 
large an organization as we would like, do as well as we can. But let 
us get some kind of an organization. Let us go step by step, and not ae 
hazard the whole thing on one throw. I don’t think you can obtain 


subscriptions enough on the outside to carry this thing througn. It is 


a good deal easier to obtain a promise to pay out of the proceeds of the | : : 
crop; that is, pay a certain percentage, which will be sufficient, per- ae 


haps, for the work, whatever it is. It is difficult to draw out of the 
pockets of reluctant growers, in advance, a sufficient sum of money to 
do the work with. I submit that it is well worth our while to consider _ 
whether some plan of that kind cannot be arranged, by which, when 


the organization has obtained sufficient headway to make it evident _ 
that we shall have a very large output, a certain percentage of the 


whole market valuation shall be appropriated to the purposes of organ- 
ization, in so far as it may be found necessary for that purpose. Now, 
this matter will appeal to you, I believe, and I speak from considerable 


experience in the matter of organization, for I have spent two years in __ 


going among the growers of this State. I believe this plan will appeal 
more strongly to the whole people. If we have an output of two- 
million pounds it is going to be a very serious business to maintain any 
price much above that which we now receive, and the output is likely 
to increase year by year. We must search for every possible means of 
economy and present our fruit at the table of the consumer—at the 
very table where it is consumed—at a less cost than they are getting it — 
for now, and save those profits which it is no longer possible to save 
with the present manner of marketing our fruits. We cannot go below — 
the present cost of production with the present-methods, and the great 
field for economizing is in the marketing of our fruits. If the product 
increases as greatly as is promised, we must economize from beginning 
toend. Weshould have from the beginning the prices from the orch- 
ard to the table of the consumer. I am no stickler for any particular 
method of organization. I am heartily in favor of the methods pre- 
sented by Professor Childs; and was heartily in favor of most of the 
plans suggested last year. The way I understand this proposition is 
that the fruit will be kept in the hands of the association and it will be 
handled as the association sees best, and those in the center may take 
advantage of whatever facilities and the best methods which present 
themselves. I think a little too much emphasis was placed yesterday 
upon the individual in the way of organization. I know very well the — 


success of the raisin organization is due, not to a single man, but to 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 47 


half a dozen men, and the man who now conducts that organization 
= would have been wholly unable to organize it had it not been for the 
 self-sacrificing manner of these men. We must have our ablest men, 
but those ablest men must be supported by men of good judgment. If 


_ we are going to do anything we must begin at once—there is not a day 


- to be lost; the talk of postponing it until April or May is absurd. We 


‘must get at it without delay, when we consider nes magnitude of this 


matter. 
Mr. RIGHTER. How do you propose to get the people out and 


talk £0 them upon this matter? ~ 


Mr.SPRAGUE. We have found the proposition of local organizations _ 


in the different districts an excellent one. Wherever you can get half 


a dozen men whose interest you can secure, there you have a nucleus 


- for an organization. 


Mr. RIGHTER. What I mean is, how are you going to get the 
people to understand what you want and what you are trying to do? 


~ Would you go to the schoolhouses of the different districts and talk to 
_ the people and tell them what to do? 


Mr. SPRAGUE. Yes; that is about the way to do it. 

Mr. GORDON. I am going to answer one remark, or rather an’ 
assertion, that was made. It wassaid, ‘There is too much importance 
placed on one man,” referring to Mr. Kearney. Now that is probably 
true. But you know there is a tendency among human beings—at 


least with Americans—to magnify the importance of one man. Ag an 


PEA TEE SS oa Ll re eh Ae ete eee TOR yey SPOT 
S ; ; 


example: When the Sunday-school teacher said, ‘“‘Who slew the Philis-. 


S tines?” one little fellow rose up and said, “Dewey.” It shows the 


tendency of the American people to idolizeone man. The raisin-growers 
were organized: First, we got our people down to such an impoverished 


- condition that they would grasp at a straw. And for that reason I 
do not believe that the people of Santa Clara Valley are poor enough 


at this time for organization. Wait until about twelve months longer, 


until you have got a good rainy season and one hundred and fifty million 


pounds of prunes on hand and forced to sell those prunes for a cent a 
pound. For many long years I have heard the people of this valley 
boast of their valuable lands. As I stated yesterday, I can recollect 


_ when, only a few years ago, you were selling your prunes for 10 and 12 


cents a pound—that is, about ten or twelve years ago. We were then 
selling raisins for 5 cents a pound, which was a good price on the 
investment. Prices went down until we got only from $17.50 to $22 a 
ton for our product. You can readily understand that, where it costs 
$45 per ton to produce an article and the producers are forced, for a 


| year or two, to sell that article for from $17 to $22 a ton, his finish is 


near athand. Ido not know the cost of prunes. But if you get them 
down to thirty cents on the dollar of what it costs to produce them, you 


will have an organization here. How to get the people to organize igs 


the situntion. Now as to the mode of getting your i seers It is ae 
only through and by failures that you will attain success. For five 
years in Fresno we struggled and failed before we got an organization. 
Mr. Kearney, now president of the association, was not in the first of 
the fight. Mr. Kearney was at that time, probably, like a good. many 
Santa Clara men—with lots of money— willing to let the thing go its own 
road. Finally, when we were all worn out, Mr. Kearney came to our 
assistance. Hecame upon the scene and took an active part—an able 
business man he is. But could he have organized alone? Never. He as 
is a magnificent leader, and with the help of the associates he had, got 
an association organized. There is, probably, a no more discouraging 
proposition on the face of this green earth than to get twenty-two 
hundred people into one way of thinking upon a given subject. You 
will have to select from your number men of different character and _ 
preach this cause as righteousness to the different types of people you s 
have seen in your business. Now, Mr. Kearney is not a success atall 
to go out and get the people to sign contracts. He is not the kind of a bs x 
man to go out in that way—he is a leader; somewhat of an aristocrat. == 
You have got to have a man constituted for that purpose. Now as to Be 
the manner of enlightening your people: You will have to hold school- 
house meetings, and have a number of men take hold of this cause and _ 
put up the preliminary money., You will have to have patriotic men . 
go out and preach to these people, and I can tell you it isa laborious : 
proposition, and I am still afraid that the Santa Clara people are not si 
poor enough at the present time to accept salvation. | <a 

Pror. CHILDS. I move that all persons interested in drying fruit—_ ‘ 
peaches, apricots, and prunes—meet here this afternoon at the close 2 
of the session, promptly, to take action toward forming an organization 3 
on the plans suggested. - 

Motion carried. | poh ae 

Recess until 1:30 o’clock p. m. of this day. | 


{ After the regular session of the forenoon, there was a call for an after meeting of all — 
those who were interested in action being taken at the earliest moment possible in the: t4q 
movement for coJperation in the dried-fruit interests. Almost the entire conyention a. 
remained, showing the great and general interest that was felt in the matter.. o 

Judge Aiken presided at the meeting. 

The contract of the Pacific Coast Fruit Association was approved, with the suggested 
amendment that there should be no temporizing with other interests in the way of — es, 
allowing any member to divide up his product with any other association. Pi 

There was also a unanimous decision, amid much enthusiasm, that a State Conven- aa 
tion of fruit-growers be held at San José on the third Monday in January, to take — aes 7 
definite action in the direction of organization. re. 

The meeting then adjourned, with expressions of Nae Secey ce upon all sides ‘upon ees 
the fine results that had been attained.] ‘i Uti BS aa 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS . CONVENTION. 49 


AFTERNOON SESSION—SECOND DAY. 


WepDNEsDAY, December 13, 1899. 
At 1:30 o’clock the convention reassembled. Vice-President AIKEN 
~ in the chair. 


DISCUSSION ON ORGANIZATION. 


Mr. NAFTZGER. The proposition mentioned by Mr. Sprague this 
morning—that you have a certain per cent of the fruit before you effect or 
conclude an organization—I think wherever that is done in that way you 
_ will make a mistake. I believe you can make a success of a small 
percentage, but not a conclusive success. In the orange business we 
undertook in the beginning to get ninety per cent. I don’t like the 
idea of taking in every proposition in order to get the ninety per cent 
in, which you will have to do in order to get that number into the asso- 
ciation. We made our proposition so broad in our attempt to get ninety 
per cent that we found it was not practical. There were a lot of fellows 
come in with their “isms” and dogmas about how the thing ought to be 
done, and it got to be a very much “go as you please” business. We 
had to take them out and organize again on a business basis, and we 
dropped sixty per cent the first thing we did and fell down to thirty per 
cent, and we have never had, since we organized on a practical business 
basis, over thirty per cent, but we have set the pace for all the orange- 
growers in Southern California nevertheless. We would doa great deal 
better if we had more, because this outside business makes us more or 
 lesstroubleall the time. If I had time I might tell you that we control 
many of the markets, because we have a capable man on the spot and a 
large quantity of fruit. 

Another question was raised here at the close of the meeting: I spoke 
this morning about the necessity, as I believe it, of making this organi- 
zation thorough all along the line clear to the otherend. Now, a gentle- 
man said to me, at the close of the meeting, that he thought of organizing 
and had very strong packers in the community, and that they had to 
include the packers. This gentleman said to me that he did not think 
they could prevail upon the growers to come in unless they took in the 
packers also. Let the growers come in, and if the packers don’t want 
to come in let them stay out. Our growth in Southern California now 
_ is a permanent and steady one, because we are able to show the grower 

_ that we will get more money for him than some one else will get for 
a him—that we are in the market. On the other proposition, the specu- 
4—BH 


Te a ie Eee a, eo A ee ae ee eee a» ~~ Se 2 ee eae” Se Nat <5. 
eect Ss eres POMS Beatie SR SS ate, ei Dt ee ee ae TUR Sab pe See =) See 
hey ke Futon 475 P ugies Z eS se ee ee ee eee + eee ‘ 
& ice F } oe a he ee mr gs oe Ret) eer) ‘ - Les 
; i pa Tee Dy ee eh Bek 
; y, 5 : fin Sage oO Pa 


50 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


lator knows more about the market ‘hans you do—and I am ne dae 
ing any one with ignorance—for under the system by which you do 
your business through the speculative houses they are the only ones — 
who know the markets, and you are shut out. I think that the grower : 
should get his fruit to the market by the shortest route possible, and 
through organization he will know as much about the market as any 
one else at all times. In our office we issue bulletins about the ship- — 
ments and prices of fruits, which we hand to our members. Whenthe 
fruit is in the car we take it, and the local people have nothing more to _ 
do with it until the fruit is marketed and the people get their money. — 
At our office we issue this bulletin daily, giving them all the infor cic 
tion concerning the market for the day, also all telegrams; so the people — 
are advised very reliably. As a result, I can say, without being 
immodest at all, that the Southern California Fruit, Exchange is the 
best known orange shipper in the world to-day. We are better known 
in the markets and more generally known to the whole people, because _ 
we do a great deal more business than any one else, and our brands are es | 
better known all over the world than those of any one else. Wehave 
come squarely in contact with the trade itself. 

Pror. CHILDS. The difficulty with us here is in regard to ie 
money. Regarding this prune contract, the growers want to know how 
they will get their money? os 

Mr. NAFTZGER. We have been so prosperous down sone that we 
have got plenty of money. It was necessary at one time to draw 
money to make provision for those who needed it in advance, and this 
we did. We had an arrangement among the bankers by which an 
order could be given by the grower. The grower issued an order on the 
association into which he had put his fruit, to pay to the bank the pro- 
ceeds of his crop up to a certain sum. The association wrote its — 
acceptance on that order, and the bank took it as collateral. The banks 
would not do that when the trees were in bloom or half-grown. It is a 
doubtful proposition in my mind to make it too easy for men to borrow _ 
money. [Applause.] I think it is a good thing for the producer to | 
keep out of debt as much as possible. Until your crop is matured it is 
pretty difficult to make it a basis for money unless you give it up to a 
speculator, and if you do it you are liable to be always in the hands of 4 
the speculator. | 

QUESTION. Are you incorporated under the cooperative principle, 
or a joint-stock corporation? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. Just a simple corporation without capital. The . 
Southern California Fruit Exchange is organized under the corporate — 
laws of California without capital. Wedo not need money. We have 
an exchange in every county. Those local exchanges are incorporat 
and then enter their local associations made up of one, two, or 


43 fi fy 
A a Fe Abo gC RG tea cairi sty 
ke DR PrN Ea Te ee POY Ce TAL 


é TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 51 


they turn it over for sale. When the fruit is sold by our agent in the 

East the money is remitted directly to the exchange making the ship- 

ment. 

_ QUESTION. Your inspector determines the quality and packing? 
Mr. NAFTZGER. The trade does that more than any one else. 

QUESTION. Have you a system of inspection? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. No,sir. We started that way, but we find enough 
friendly rivalry among the exchanges to try and keep their grade up 

and compete in the markets for the top prices. 

— QUESTION. Have you any advantages in the freight rates? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. We sell the fruit for just as much as we can. 

QUESTION. Do you have any control over the subordinate 

exchanges? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. Only the marketing of the fruit. 

QUESTION. What do you do, then? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. We have control over the selling agency. The 

_ astern agencies are appointed by us and are entirely under our 

- eontrol. The goods are all billed to our order. 

QUESTION. Do the other subordinate exchanges have capital? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. No, sir; not as a rule. They own their own 
- packing-houses. 

; QUESTION. What if an individual put part of his crop in your 
charge and part elsewhere? 

= - Mr. NAFTZGER. We do not permit of that. He goes the whole 
e 22 or none. | 

QUESTION. Who fixes the prices—your central association? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. All our goods are sold delivered at the other 
end of the line on the conditions of the market as we find them. 
~ QUESTION. Do you ever employ outside packers? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. No, sir. 

QUESTION. What is your rate of commission? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. Just exactly what it costs to do the Bacio 

QUESTION. What does it cost? 

Mr. NAFTZGEHR. An average of about three per cent of the gross 
selling price. Covering all charges from the time the goods are loaded 
for shipment. We have nothing to do with the packing charge or any- 
‘thing pertaining to it. From the time the goods are ready for shipment 
; our average cost has been about three per cent on the gross sale. 

- QUESTION. Halfof the cost on this end and half on the other end 
of the line? 
Mr. NAFTZGER. More than half at the other end of the line, 


/ 


52 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


because we have from fifteen to twenty salaried agents on pay all ie 
year round. 

QUESTION. If A put a good pack and B not so good, woulda he 
handle both? re ee 

Mr. NAFTZGER. Yes, sir; the goods are sold on their merits and _ 
the association with the excellent pack gets the benefit of it: We have 
goods in our association that can be sold in the auctions of the United _ 
States without being opened, because they know it is just on what ee 
it is represented to be. | 

QUESTION. Do you sell in carload lots? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. As a rule. A car lot will be sold and divided 
between two or three merchants by common agreement where the 
market is small. 

QUESTION. What cars do you use? oy 
Mr. NAFTZGER. Asa rule our business has been confined almost — 
entirely to the Fruit-Growers’ Express cars and the Santa Fé refrig- 

erator cars. 

QUESTION. If we saw proper to use another car would. you permit 
that privilege? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. I don’t think so. I prefer not to state our atti- 
tude on that question definitely, except to say in a general ay that we 
are going to undertake to protect our rights. 

QUESTION. Have you the right to route your cars? | 

Mr. NAFTZGER. I will say there has been up to this time no 
interference with our usual custom of routeing our cars. As far as 1 
am concerned as manager of the Exchange, I do not question the right 
of the railroad company to route the shipments. I think, under the 
decision of the court, they have a right to route the shipment and 
choose the agency by which it will proceed to its destination. 

QUESTION. Would that plan apply to green fruits—peaches, etce.? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. We handle oranges and lemons only, so far as 
this end of the line is concerned. At the other end of the line our 
agents sell for the Southern California Deciduous Fruit Exchange. 

QUESTION. As to the green fruits—you will have to market them 
immediately ? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. Certainly. You have got to market them through 
some agency; either in the auctions or in the Western markets. | 

QUESTION. Regarding the right to use another car from what you ~ 
have mentioned, I infer from your answer that there is, or will be, an __ 
effort made in regard to that question on the part of your organization. 

Mr. NAFTZGER. As I said, we don’t propose to sleep on any of — 
our rights, and intend to maintain them. Now, gentlemen, I suppose 
that so long as you are asking me these questions I will try to answer 
them. The decision of the court is this: There have been several cases; _ 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 53 


one was the Memphis-Ogden case, in which the court has held that the — 
railroad that takes the fruit and guarantees the rate has a right to 
choose the agencies by which it will carry it to its destination. The 
Memphis-Ogden case was this: The shippers asked the privilege of 
choosing the Pennsylvania & New York and New Haven & Hartford 
as aroute. The fruit was to be shipped over this route to some point 
in New England. The railroad company took the shipment and 
shipped it at the rate agreed upon over a different route. The shipper 
denied the right of the road to change the shipment, and hence the suit. 
It was exactly in accord with the decision of the United States District 
Court in a similar case,in which the court held that the carrier 

guaranteeing a rate to the point of destination had a right to choose 

the agency to carry it. It seems to me that is good sense and good law. 
_ On the other hand, the court has also said in the same connection that 
_ the carrier had not the right to choose a more circuitous route, or a 
longer or more dangerous route, but that they had a right to choose 
the agency. | 

QUESTION. Does the thirty per cent of the growers in your organ- 
ization raise the prices for the seventy per cent remaining outside of 
the organization? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. The grower says that if he cannot sell his goods 
on the spot for as much as the exchange would get for them, he 
__-will let the exchange take them. Consequently the speculator has got 
to buy them at the prices that have been prevailing in the markets, and 

he is not going to play ball with them. 

QUESTION. Would you suggest that all the products of the State 
of California be centered under one general head? Do you intend us to 
join you in this undertaking you have so far progressed in? 

Mr. NAFTZGEHR. I did not mean an organization in California 
under one general head for the transaction of the business of these 
various interests. I said the prune-growers would have their own 
independent organization at this end of the line, the dried-fruit men 
theirs, and the raisin men theirs, but that we should have some relation 
existing here among us—whatever might be necessary—and that we use 

_ the same Hastern agencies in the markets; that is, we appoint our 
__ agencies in the markets. Take Chicago, for instance, we have three or 
| four men in Chicago most of the time. It would not require another 
office, another telephone, another lot of stenographers, and all that 
sort of thing if we joined our interests in Chicago. We could have 
‘prune men, raisin men, dried-fruit men, all together in one office. I 
stated it was with a view to a combination at the other end of the line, 
making them great places for the distribution of California products. 
- So far as the Southern California Fruit Exchange is concerned, we 
Bs are now busy practically all the year either with oranges or lemons, 


« 

wh 

A 

Ab 

a 

i Sa 
* 


i 
aris", 
zs 
Pr! 
Fh, 
e 
a 
& 
Sy 
4 
Rt 
Pe 
= 

ee 


PRR ee Pe eae 


Patt om 


54 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


and we could not extend to you an invitation to come in with us Z 
at all. We are not looking for business in that way, but we are seeking aoa. 
a union of interest with every fruit. producer of California, with the : 
belief that we could simplify the business at the other end of the line et 
in a way that would be profitable to all concerned. | a ae 


PROSPECTIVE COMPETITION FROM THE PHILIPPINE _ 
ISLANDS. : 


By PROF. A. P. HAYNE, or BerkeELey. > ey 


Mr. PRESIDENT, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: It was my good fortune, a 
while serving as First Lieutenant in the California Artillery, to have 
been assigned by the War Department to the duty of reporting on the __ 
agricultural resources of the Philippine Islands. Unfortunately, the 
natives did not take kindly to the status of affairs,and I found that 
the problem of proving that the plow was mightier than the sword was __ 
not quite as easy a task as I had hoped. Idonotwant youtothinkthat 
I claim to know very much about the resources of the Philippines. I 
was there, however, upon this special duty, for a year, and I picked up 
a few facts concerning the country, most of which I have reported to 
Washington. The subject is a very large one, so I shall not inflict 
myself on you very long, but give you a slight rapid sketch of the — 
resources of the islands, bringing out those which may compete with 
ours in the United States. J have here with me a map of the Island of 
Luzon, which is only about half the area of the Philippine archipelago, 
As you will observe, it is a very mountainous island and quite long; 
the coast-line being nearly three times that of the State of California. 

Rice, of which there are over a hundred varieties, is the most impor- 
tant agricultural product of the Philippines. Bread is a luxury, as 
wheat and barley are not raised there, on account of the climate, and __ 
there is no danger of competition with the American rice, as the islands 
do not raise enough for their own purposes. Over three million dollars’ 
worth are imported annually from China. The population of theislands 
is very dense. On the Island of Luzon there is a population of four 
and a half millions in the inhabited portion, as compared witha million 
and a half in the inhabited portions of the State of California. = all seam 
the islands there is a population of twelve millions. ey 

Hemp grows wild in the forests or where forests have been Glenred a 
away, and is not cultivated. The value of this and other products is zs 
much less than it would otherwise be if it were not for the labor prob- 
lem. The native will not work so long as he has a bushel of ricein his 
hut. It is impossible for a white man to do manual labor there fora 
great length of time. They may direct it, but not do the actual oe 


- TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 55 


themselves. Negroes have not as yet been given a sufficient trial there, 
and the attempt might be as dangerous for them as it was for the 
_ Chinese, on account of the hostility of the natives. 

3 Sugar is one of the chief industries of several provinces in Luzon and 
of several islands in the south, notably Negros and Panay. Large 
- quantities are exported, chiefly to America and England. Great im- 
provements can be made in methods, and probably the sharpest 
- competition the United States will have will be in sugar. The soil and 
e. climate are especially well adapted to sugar-growing, and with a little 
- improvement in methods, roads, etc., the export of sugar will increase 
__-vastly. 
= There is no danger of any serious competition in citrus fruits. The 
best oranges they raise there are scarcely fit to eat. They are not 
- as good as the worst that are produced here. It takes four or five of 
= their limes to make a good drink of lemonade. The acid juices are 


Y aM a - 
{ 


- sought after by all in that climate, and instead of there being any 
_ danger of competition from the islands, no doubt they would offer a 
splendid market for the sale of our citrus fruits. Care must be taken 
_ in the shipping, however, for in several shipments that were made about 
ninety per cent of the lemons spoiled. 
Cotton is grown on the islands, but to a very limited extent, and can 
never come into competition ait the product of America. 


PROS Tee as eR, 
RSS srs) Te" 
7 ¥ 


QUESTION. How about the woods, teak wood in particular ? 


3 | ANSWER. Ido not know if teak is grown. The most valuable woods 
- _ are the hard woods. The value of the soft woods in the Philippines is 
2 250 slight that upon recommendation of the Quartermaster Department 
the United States Army brought from the Pacific Slope all the wood 
__ that is used in the Philippines. 

< Q. How about the gold and iron deposits ? 

& A. They are very large and extensive. The iron deposits are very 
4 rich, but owing to Spanish rule it has been impossible to exploit any of 
- the mines to any extent, on account of such a continual system of 
____ bribery which had to be resorted to. 

= ‘e How about the gold ? 

a . The mineral resources of the Islands are great, and I acre! in 
“s a a few years to see great excitement in that region. Gold and 
__ copper and nearly all the minerals you find here are found there in 
abundance. 

4 2 There is one thing more that may possibly compete with us, and that 
isthe cattle. It is a magnificent cattle country in many places. They 
ae have plenty of feed and raise it without irrigation. I think it will be 


some time before the cattle will be dangerous to us, on account of cattle 
S - thieves and ignorance of the nae. 


56 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


Q. How do grapevines thrive there ? 

A. As in all tropical countries they grow, but the fruit does not ripen. — 
I have only heard of one or two cases where the vine would mature its 
fruit. By constant care and certain systems of pruning and a great deal . 
of difficulty, they have been able to raise a few pounds of grapes. 

Q. How about the pineapple? | 

A. It grows in great abundance, especially in ‘the southern part of the 
Islands. The coffee industry has got from an exporting Ma to zero, _ 
owing to diseases. 

A difficulty the Americans will have to contend with in civilizing the 
natives is the question of insects, Most of these people believe and 
practice that every time you kill an insect the Lord will send twenty 
more. If you hire them for that work they will go on a strike, because 
they believe it to be sacrilegious. 


Vote of Thanks. 


Pror. CHILDS. JI move that a vote of thanks be extended to 
Professor Hayne for his very instructive remarks on the Philippine 
Islands and its industries. 

Motion carried. 


THREATENED REDUCTION OF DUTIES ON FRUIT IMPORTS. 


B. N. Row ey, of San Francisco, submitted the following resolu- 
tion: 


WHEREAS, The government of the United States has entered into a reciprocity con- 
vention with the government of France, in which it is contemplating a material reduc- 
tion of duties on the imports of French prunes, walnuts, almonds, preserved fruits, 
olive oil, wines, etc.; and, 

WHEREAS, It is the bebe of the fruit-growers of the State of California, assembled ~ 
at their annual meeting, that any lessening or removal of the present tariff duties on 
French fruits, nuts, and wines would work a most serious injury to the fruit, nut, and. 
wine industries of the Pacific Coast; now therefore, it is 

Resolved, That the fruit-growers of the State of California do most earnestly and 
strenuously protest against any and all proposed reductions from existing tariff rates 
on imports of French prunes, walnuts, almonds, preserved fruits, olive oil, wines, etc.; _ 
and further, it is 

Resolved, That the honorable members of the United States Senate are hereby 
respectfully requested to so modify the proposed reciprocity treaty between the United 
States and France as to permit the present tariff on imports of French fruits, nuts, and — 
wines to remain unimpaired; and thus giving to the fruit-growers of the Pacific Coast 
that measure of protection which satisfies labor with a fair return and lends safety to 
the millions of capital invested in their orchards; it is further 

Resolved, That a copy of these resolutions be engrossed and that the same shall be 
forwarded to Senator George C. Perkins, through whom the action of the fruit-growers ~ 
of California, in convention assembled, shall be made known to the pe ie members 
of the United States Senate. 


Referred to Committee on Resolutions. 


Lea: 
CT a & 


e- 
a 
P 
as 
a 
Bier 
; 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION, by: 


The committee immediately reported favorably and recommended the 
adoption of the resolutions. 
The same were thereupon adopted. 


ENTERTAINMENT BY THE CITIZENS OF SAN JOSE. 


JupceE LEWIS. In behalf of the different organizations of San José, 
I beg to announce that this evening there will be a social and entertain- 


_ment in this hall, by some of our excellent ladies, which will be confined 


to singing and music and to which you are all invited. There will also 


be light refreshments served, and I trust you will all come. J know the 


more we get acquainted with you the more we will like you and I know 


ss you will like us better. The entertainment will commence at 7:30. 


2 oad ema ie 
ae Se Lj 
a: 


EXCURSION TO STANFORD UNIVERSITY. 


Announcement was made of an excursion to Stanford University for 
Saturday by the local committee, and that a special train had been pro- 
vided through the courtesy of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, 
through the solicitation of their district agent, Mr. Thomas Graham of 
San José. 

Pror. CHILDS. I move that as there has been -a great courtesy 


extended by Mr. Graham in securing for us this train, the Committee 


on Resolutions be requested to draw up resolutions thanking him and 
the Southern Pacific Railroad Company for this great kindness. 

Motion carried. 

Recess until 9:30 o’clock a. M. to-morrow. 


58 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


THIRD DAY—THURSDAY. 


DECEMBER 14; 1899. 


Topics FoR THE Day: The Raisin Industry—Review of the Season’s Output, 
and Operation of Coupenatine Organizations; 
Fruitfulness; 
Varieties of Fructs to be Encouraged, etc. 


Suppression of Fruit and Tree Pests; ee 


Tree and Plant Diseases; ails 
| Beneficial and Injurious Insects, Birds, etc.; 

Protection to the Fruit Industry; 

State and National Legislation, etc. 


At 9:30 o’clock A. m. President Coopsr called the convention to order. 


ADULTERATION OF FOOD PRODUCTS. 


r 


M. THEopoRE KEARNEY, of Fresno, submitted the following resolution: 


Wuereas, A bill will be introduced in the present Congress prohibiting the adultera- 
tion of food products; and 


Wuereas, It is notorious that a very great proportion of the fruit jellies offered for 


sale are not true to name, and in many cases do not contain any fruit whatever; that 
the adulteration of olive oil is carried on to so great an extent as to threaten the destruc- 


tion of an important industry of this State, and that the so-called ‘‘ brick” vineyards _ 


in Eastern cities are marketing large quantities of liquids labeled brandy, port, sherry, 
angelica, etc., which do not contain a. particle of grape juice, but are concocted of 
glucose, saccharine, raw grain spirit, aniline dyes, flavoring extracts, and other poison- 
ous ingredients, which are deleterious to health, fraudulent, and a menace to our busi- 
ness interests at home and abroad; now, therefore, be it 


Resolved, by the fruit-growers of the State of California in convention assembled, That 


we urgently request of our Senator and our Representatives to assist, by every means 


in their power, the passage of a bill that can be enforced in every State in the Union 


which will promptly put an end to the evils herein complained of, and to the further 
evil of the sale of any articles of food or drink under a false or fraudulent label. 


Referred to Committee on Resolutions. 
The Committee on Resolutions reported having carefully considered 

the same, and recommended its adoption by the convention. 
Whereupon the resolution was adopted. 


ae 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 59 


RECIPROCITY AND OTHER TREATIES. 


M. Turoporr Kearney, of Fresno, submitted the following resolution: 


WueEreas, Congress is about to be called upon to consider and approve reciprocity 
and other treaties with numerous foreign States, which treaties will materially reduce 
the tariff on many of the leading products of this State, such as dry and sparkling 
__wines, ports, sherries; citrus, dried, preserved, and fresh fruits; raisins, nuts, olive oil, 
and beet sugar; which reductions of tariff will expose these leading and growing indus- 
tries to most unfair and ruinous competition; and 

WHEREAS, It is desirable to remind our lawmakers that in California the United States 
possesses a region unequaled in the world in the extent and variety of its natural 
resources, which if developed under wise laws and the fostering care of our National 
Government will support a population as great as that of Great Britain, France, or 
Germany; and 
_ Wuereas, In view of our geographical position and the great possibilities of future 

trade along the shores of the Pacific Ocean, the rapid development of this great wealth 
is of the utmost importance to the strength and glory of this Nation, and cannot be 
successfully carried on while capital is exposed to loss through an unwise changefulness 
and meddling with our tariff laws; and 

Wuereas, The Republican party and the present administration have received the 
cordial and hearty support of the people of California, as shown by the State’s greatly 
increased Republican representation in Washington, which support was given on our 
___ faith in the promises and pledges of this great party, through its leaders and its press, 
S that all our industries should, by tariff legislation, receive ample protection, to the end 

that they may be stimulated to their greatest development; 
Now, therefore, We, the fruit-growers of the State of California in convention assem- 
bled, do with all due respect, but firmly and earnestly, call upon our Senator and our 
_ Representatives to urge upon our honored President and upon Congress as a matter of 
sound policy, and demand as a matter of common right and justice, that no reductions 
_ whatever be made or allowed in our present tariff laws which will directly or indirectly 
reduce the protection under which we are now working and which has brought us all 
prevailing and lunexampied prosperity. 


“Adopted. 


CO-OPERATION AMONG THE FARMERS AS APPLIED TO 
THE RAISIN INDUSTRY. 


4 : ApprEss By M. THEODORE KEARNEY, or Fresno, 
President and General Manager California Raisin-Growers’ Association. 


FeLturow Fruit-Growers: The question how shall we market our 
. crops so as to produce the best results is one that is attracting the 
___ greatest attention among the fruit-growers of California. Having had 
3 some experience in endeavoring to solve the problem for the benefit of 
the raisin-growers, there has been a considerable demand made upon 
me for information concerning the methods adopted by us, and I there- 
fore desire, with your permission, to avail myself of the very favorable 
medium of the proceedings of this convention in meeting this demand. 
zg Raisins have been produced in California for many years, but it was 
not until 1885 that the quantity reached the round figure of 10,000,000 


60 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


bet Se ae 2 
BY ee wey i ; as 
a ‘Sem i Zt 
Se tot 
oF ‘ 


pounds. The production rapidly increased each year thereafter until 2h 
nine years later, or in 1894, the output was 103,000,000 pounds. During ~ 


this period, which was one of great prosperity in the United States, the 
demand was in excess of the supply, except in 1894, and the raisins 
were sold f. o. b. shipping points at steadily advancing prices. The 


panic of 1893, and the excessive crop of 1894, together with the 


dishonest and suicidal practices of some packers in filling orders with — 


raisins of a quality much inferior to the grades indicated by the box 
marks, brought about a total change in the methods of marketing the 
crop. Thereafter the dealers in the East refused to pay for raisins 
except after arrival and upon examination; and as the demand was 
very much reduced by this change, and the crop of 1894 was much in 


excess of previous years, the growers were obliged to ship the raisins 


Hast on consignment. I think we have all learned the bitter lesson of 
the consignment system, and I need say no more on this point than 


that, with nearly every crop in the hands of a separate broker—for | 


there were almost as many agents selling the crops as there were 


growers—each grower’s crop was used against every other grower’s crop 


to beat down the price and ruin the market. ‘The logical result of all 
this was that when the commissions, freight, packing, and other charges 
were paid, the grower not only had nothing left for his labor, but was 
actually out of pocket on the year’s transaction. In fact, raisins 
dropped to $18 per ton in Fresno in 1897, and the farmers found it 
cheaper to use them, and did so use them, as a substitute for barley in 


feeding their work horses. As a further result of this condition great 


areas of raisin vineyards throughout the State were uprooted, and in 
Fresno County alone the Assessor’s books show a reduction in acreage 
in two years of 16,000 acres, representing a loss to the growers in labor 


and material of at least $100 per acre, or $1,600,000. Of course, this 


meant widespread ruin to the raisin-growers, and hundreds of mortgages 
were foreclosed, and the farmer and his family turned adrift to compete 
in an already overcrowded labor market, tramping about the State in 
search of a day’s work. 


You will naturally ask, was nothing attempted to put a check upon 
this condition of things? I answer, yes. For three years efforts were 


made to organize the growers, but without success. I regret to say that 
farmers as a class are somewhat inclined to an excess of suspicion at 
the wrong time, and to an absence of it at the right time. It is also 
unfortunate that in large business affairs they appear to be lacking in 
masterful business ability and broad views, which are so necessary and 
are so conspicuous in the many large undertakings in commercial life. 
It requires great patience and greater perseverance to win their confi- 
dence, but when they secure men of ability, and of unswerving integrity, 
as leaders, they can be depended upon to fall into line and stay thee 
however fierce the battle may rage. | 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 61 


To form an organization that will win the confidence of the fruit- 
growers and command success it is essential— 3 
_ First—That capable men shall be selected as its officers. And let me 


gay at this point that growers should not commit the fatal error of 


refusing to pay sufficiently high salaries to secure competent men. ‘The 
services of able business men are wanted by shrewd men everywhere, 
and as these services command high salaries, or as such men can use 
their time with large profit in their own affairs, it is useless to expect to 
secure them ata low price. Suppose the Raisin-Growers’ Association 
had been obliged to pay their five active directors $5,000 a year each, or 
$25,000 in all, the investment would, it appears to me, have been a good 
one, for in the little side issue of selling the surplus grapes to the 


- wineries these directors, by their firmness and business judgment, broke 


up an understanding among the winery companies and compelled them 
to advance their prices for grapes $3 per ton, or equal to $100,000 on the 
crops purchased this season. Again, 1n naming prices for this year’s 
crop of raisins, the directors first made careful investigation of the con- 
ditions of the market, both in the United States and abroad, and 
advanced the prices over last year’s more than 14 cents per pound, or 
equal to an increased profit to the growers on this year’s crop of $780,000. 
If we should figure on the basis of what raisins would probably have 
brought without the aid of the association, the increased returns would 
amount to at least a million and a half of dollars. It should, of course, 
be understood that high salaries should only be paid to those who can 
furnish ample proof, in what they have previously accomplished, of their 
ability to earn them. 

_ Second—Having secured the right men to manage the business, at 
least seventy-five per cent of the whole crop of the State or Coast should 
be placed under the absolute control of the directors to be packed and 


sold. Grades should be established under which the fruit is to be packed 


and sold, and these grades should be rigidly maintained without fear or 
favor. The greatest care should be exercised in sending out the fruit in 
attractive packages suited to the varying requirements of the different 
markets, and every parcel should be packed with absolute honesty and 
uniformity. All packages should have on them the brand of the 
association, in addition to that of the packer, so that the trade shall 
come to rely upon the association’s trademark as a guaranty of quality. 
One of the most serious obstacles in the way of development of markets 
for fruit is in the shortsighted and dishonest practice of some shippers 
and farmers in placing choice fruit on top and poor or worthless stuff 
in the middle, thus greatly exasperating the buyer. The only hope for 
a remedy for this evil is in association, which takes the packing out 
of the hands of the individual. I have said that seventy-five per cent 
of the crop of the State or Coast should be secured. In my judgment it 


62 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


would be useless to hope to control the price oe prunes, for instanes’ if 


more than twenty-five per cent of the crop of the Coast were permitted he 


to be offered in competition with the association’s crop. 


_ Third—Do not at the beginning ask the farmer to subscribe ae 4 
sums of money for any purpose. First prove your ability to make a oy 


success of the business, and then he will subscribe if you find it neces- — 


sary to ask him. This, I think, was the mistake made last summerin _ 


the attempt to organize the deciduous fruit-growers. When you have 


absolute control of the crop you will find business men. faliing over = 


each other to finance and handle it for you. Get control of the crop— 
first; do it at once; don’t wait until the crop is almost ready for eo 
ing before you begin this important work, and even if you do not suc- 
ceed in making such arrangements as you wish the first year, you will 
be all the better prepared to try again the following year, and in any 
event you will be much stronger with an organization than without it. 
One of the greatest difficulties we had to contend with in the raisin: 


industry was to convince the-grower that if he would cut loose from the 


packer and commission man, we could help him to secure advances on 


his crop; but he quickly found that as soon as the title of seventy-five — 


per cent of the raisin crop of the State, even before it was grown, was 


vested in the association, the banks were quite willing to.cash the ~ 
growers’ drafts on the association to a reasonable amount, payable out 


of the proceeds of the crops when sold. 
Fourth—This, although the last of the four essentials I desire to 
bring to your notice, is the most important of all: it is the campaign of 


organization. You will find among the mass of farmers, and especially 
among those who have been fairly successful, an apathy; a dense, — 


dogged indifference; an incapacity to grasp the possibilities or probabili- 


ties of the future; a narrow, all-prevailing suspicion that you havean 
ax of your own to grind, that is extremely discouraging. Those of you, — 


however, who realize how much time is at stake, how great the loss will 
be if matters are allowed to proceed as in the past, and how great the 
gain to all individual interests and to the State at large, if the fruit 


> 


farmers of California can be induced to organize, should take this matter 


in hand with the firm determination to win. Much labor will be neces- 
sary, and there should be thorough organization to carry on the work. 


Let it be taken in hand on the same lines as those of a political cam- 3 


paign, with press bureau, men of influence to address meetings of — 


growers at the principal centers, and active workers holding meetings — a 


at all the schoolhouses in the fruit-growing districts. In this way you 
can succeed; without it, you will be wasting your time in trying. 
Surely the reward is worth the effort, and I can imagine no more 
inspiring and noble work than to bring overflowing prosperity to this 
earthly paradise—California. | | 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 63 


As a detail of organization, I have been asked the question whether 


it is better to have one organization for the whole State or a series of 
organizations scattered over the State, with a central association com- 
_ posed of delegates from the local organizations. We should bear in 
- mind that we are much inclined to be creatures of habit, and we natur- 


ally adopt the political idea of local organizations represented in a 


central body. While this principle is entirely sound in matters of local 


government, with independent local conditions which must have first 
consideration, it would not, in my judgment, be at all applicable to a 
fruit-growers’ organization. ‘There is weakness in divided and scattered 
councils, and in the diverse views of so many judges. Truth is found in 
the homely saying that “too many cooks spoil the broth.” I am con- 
vinced that there should be but one organization for each division of 
the fruit-growing interests within the limits of California; the divisions. 
to be, first—in priority of organization—citrus fruits; second, raising; 
third, prunes and dried fruits; fourth, nuts; and fifth, deciduous fruits. 
Kach organization should be given absolute control of the crop, and its 
officers should have the cordial and unwavering support of its members 
so as to most thoroughly centralize the power, for the stronger you make 
the head of your organization the greater influence and success you will 
secure. This principle has been adopted by the raisin-growers, and 
although we have members and packing-houses from Woodland to San 
Diego, we find no difficulty in having every pound of raisins invoiced 
from our office in Fresno and every grower paid for his crop from the 
same office. It may appear later on that the management of these - 
various fruit interests could be carried on more economically by merg- 
ing them into one organization. That subject, however, can with safety 
be allowed to wait awhile. It is better that we learn to walk before we 
attempt to run. 

There is one feature of our raisin industry that has given us serious 
trouble and has proved a difficult problem to solve, and that is our rela- 
tions a8 growers with the packers and selling agents. Although the 
packers as a class have found the raisin business very profitable—their 


large gains in packing charges, commissions, etc., having been swallowed 


up in unprofitable speculations in raisins and other fruits—they were 


_ very much opposed to organization by the growers, and used much influ- 


ence with many of those whom they had helped financially. However, 
we proceeded with the organization and loosened their grip on the needy 
growers by arranging with the banks to let the growers have money on. 
orders on us. 

As the virtual owners of the raisins we last season made contracts 
with the packers to pack and sell our raisins for an agreed price, but 


_ the working of the system gave rise to so much friction—the packers 
never haying been subject to control previously—that at the beginning 


64 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


of the new year I appealed to the growers to arrange to do their own 
packing and selling independently of the packers, but without avail, 
there being a large minority who feared to venture.. A new contract 
with the packers was therefore entered into, under which we have worked 
this season, which was more stringent than the previous one and which © 
provided phat at the beginning of the season we would distribute the 
crop among the various packers at our discretion by an allotment, and 
each packer was required to agree to buy and pay for, on or before Jan- 
uary 15th next, at prices to be fixed by us, all of the raisins alloted to 
him; all raisins to be paid for in cash before shipment. On these terms 
one hundred and seventeen per cent of the whole crop, no matter what 
- the quantity might prove to be, was applied for. In other words, seven- 
teen per cent more than the whole was asked for, and we were obliged to 
scale down their applications. This it would seem should be entirely 
satisfactory to the growers, but the fault I find with it is that it stimulates 
a fierce rivalry among the packers both to secure raisins from the growers 
and to sell them, and although they are under heavy penalties, theforfeit ___ 
money being in our hands, not to offer inducements to growers nor to 
share commissions with buyers, both are being done and to the extreme 
dissatisfaction of those who honorably live up to their engagements, and 
it is done in such a way that it is simply impossible to prove a case 
against the delinquent. I feel all the while as if we are camped on ~ 
the top of a volcano and that an eruption is imminent at any moment. 
Another evil in this state of affairs is that the trade in the Hast is in 
a continual state of unrest, each dealer fearing that his neighbor is ~ 
getting the advantage of him in price by this underhanded giving away 
of a portion or the whole of the packer’s commission. I believe it 
would be very greatly to the interest of the growers if this business of 
distribution were carried on in such a way that every dealer would be 
absolutely certain that his competitors could have no advantage in price 
over him. With this assurance the product would be received with 
favor and the sale of it fostered and promoted to the fullest extent of 
the enormous possibilities within the power of the jobbers and whole- 
sale dealers of groceries. With this end in viewI shall this winter seek © 
to bring into one organization all the raisin packing houses and seeding 
plants; and to make the bond of interest stronger between the packers 
and the growers I shall advocate the purchase by the Growers’ Associa- 
tion of one half the stock of the Packers’ Association. The profit to — 
the packers coming to them in dividends on the stock, there will be no 
temptation for any one of them to cut commissions or in any other 
manner violate the rules of the association, and as a result I shall 
confidently expect at home, peace and greatly increased profits for the 
packers, and throughout the East a general feeling of satisfaction in the — 
trade. 


- TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 65 


Before leaving this subj ect I desire to emphasize the fact that dealers 


against a fall in prices after they have bought. I have been told 
repeatedly by influential dealers that they would not object to an 
advance of a cent or two cents a pound in raisins if we would support 
the market for them, and we therefore make our guaranty of prices a 
leading feature of our price lists. I wish also to say that I have by 
_ experience learned this fact: that it is not a low price in itself that will 
_ make a market for our products, but much more than that it is the good 
will and active assistance of the trade that will secure customers for 
you. As an illustration I may say that our crop of raisins in 1897 was 
3,250 carloads, and being without organization our prices dropped until 
in December unpacked raisins could not be sold at 1 cent per pound and 
__we had to carry over 1,000 carloads into the following season. In 1898 
our crop was 3,500 carloads, but with organization we put up the price 
of unpacked raisins to 3 cents per pound, and sold the whole crop— 
_ together with the 1,000 cars carried over. 3 

| This year the crop is estimated at 2,700 carloads of ten tons each, 
and with organization we have raised the price of unpacked raisins 
from last year’s figure of 8 cents to within a fraction of 5 cents a pound, 
___ or in two years from 1 cent to nearly 5 cents. At this price there have 
_ already been shipped out and paid for 2,200 carloads; 150 cars of the 
remainder are sold on time orders, and the remaining 350 cars are 
- under contract of sale and will be paid for by January 15th next, thus 
closing up the growers’ business on a cash basis within four months 
_ from the beginning of harvest, and for the first time in the history of 
the industry. | 

Ss Mainly as a result of this success the savings banks report that the 
__ growers are rapidly paying off their mortgages; traveling men say that 
Fresno, the center of the raisin district, is one of the most active busi- 
_ ness places in the State, and real estate agents say that the value of 
_ Fresno town property has increased fifty per cent within two years, 
with free sales, and that vineyards which two years ago could not be 
sold for $100 to $150 per acre, now find willing purchasers at $250 to 
_ $875 per acre. | 

I can assure you that the raisin- growers, almost to a man, are now 
firmly convinced that their salvation is in combination. With com- 
_ bination we are able to put into practice the lesson Californians have 
been taught, to “charge all the traffic will bear.”’ With combination 
we can guarantee to the dealer that if he buys our product, he shall 
not lose, for we will hold up the market for him at all hazards. In 
this is the keynote of our success. With combination every grower is 
assured that he will get the average price of the season for his crop, 
: and where is the ove who would not be willing to sell on these 
ee 3 


66 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


terms, and thus be relieved of the worry and anxiety of trying to 


determine when he ought to sell? : 

This is an era of trusts and combinations. The principle is sound 
‘and it is here to stay. By combination great economies are secured 
and the cost of producing and transferring commodities from the pro- 


ducer to the consumer is greatly lessened. To the fruit-growers of — 


California this principle will prove of untold value in the future. We 


have in this great State the garden spot of the world, where fruits of — 


every kind can be grown to perfection and in the greatest profusion. 
Our sole aim from now on should be to apply this principle of com- 
bination in all our affairs, so as to secure the greatest economy in pro- 
duction and in placing our products on the markets of the world, while 
at the same time supplying fruit of the highest quality, put up in 


attractive packages and packed with absolute honesty. We may then ~ 


hope that in addition to our splendid home market we will, with the 
opening of the Nicaragua Canal, be called upon to send out hundreds 


of shiploads of fruit, and reach countless millions of people whose — 


demands will in time require the products of fifty acres of orchard and — 


vineyard for each acre now in bearing in California. Let us not, 
therefore, as producers seek to destroy the principle of combination, 
but rather let us use that principle to enhance the value of our own 
products, so that we can afford to pay an enhanced price for what we 
buy and have a margin left with which to improve and extend our 
industries. This, I am convinced, is the line of least resistance and 
the one that will yield the best results. We should, however, advocate 


and recommend to our lawmakers a wise control and supervision of — 


trusts and combinations, to the end that we may preserve to our use 
all the advantages of combination, and at the same time protect the 
people from the gross abuse of the principle. I thank you for the 
patience with which you have listened to me. 


DISCUSSION. 


Mr. NAFTZGER. There is one point upon which I would like Mr. 
Kearney to say something more. He has pointed out to us in his address, 
in a very strong and clear manner, the advantages of organization and 
every point of it. Every statement in that address has my unqualified 
approval, after seven or eight years’ experience in efforts toward cooper- 
ation. He has pointed out the dangers and evils in having those 
extralogical features in it; that is, the element of the speculator. I 
am after the speculator—that is, to get him out where he belongs. His 
primary interests are to destroy or prevent the organization. I do not 
want to take him into the house when. we do not think he is a useful 


z 


member of society. I do not want to take him into the house and. > 


oA eee 


"Seas 4 


a 


a ee ee Be 5 
et Ee de EO a ae Te " 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 67 


. support him. I will ask Mr. Kearney (but not to go into the matters 


that are private with him), why in his judgment shouldn’t the packer 
or speculator, whatever you call him who is not a producer, why should 
he not be eliminated with one stroke? 

Mr. KHARNEY. Mr. President, that is a very important question 
and one that I have given a great deal of thought to. I have advocated 
eliminating the packer, and confess to you quietly that I did so to 


bring him to terms. I believe that it is desirable for the grower to 


use the skill and business ability of the packers and commission men 
when that skill and that ability can be used under your own control. 
I think the packer in himself and the commission man in himself is a 
very necessary part of the machinery of this business. I do not say the 


-speculator, but the packer and the commission man; and it is always 


desirable to get the best details available, but they must be under your 
control. I confess that I am not yet prepared to say to the growers of 
California, “Do your own marketing.” I want to seethem develop a type 
of business ability as high as any in business circles. Some may have 
already developed it. My view is only as to the raisin industry, and I 
do not want to say anything that will reflect on any other branch of 
the business. From what I have seen of the raisin-growers as a class, 


I am not yet prepared to give them a diploma as business men. 


[Laughter.] And I think it is well for us, when we can, to get the best 
business men we can reach employed in our business and get them to 
‘do that part of it first. We will do the growing. 

Mr. NAFTZGER. Mr. Kearney stated in his address that the success 
of marketing the crop and the success of sustaining the prices of the 
raisins of California were due to the fact that the Raisin-Growers’ 
Association said to the trade—the legitimate trade—“ We will sustain 
the prices for you.” The packers didn’t say that. The trade did not 
depend upon the packers or the commission men or middle men to say 
it, but the trade depended upon the association. Now, why didn’t the 
growers go straight to the association? It is a well-established rule by 
which the association was able to do this thing. The association con- 
trolled the product, therefore the association could sustain the market, and, 
as Mr. Kearney has said, it is not so much the question of price. We have 
found that in our business it is not so much as to the price that the 
dealer pays for the product, as it is that he knows that to-morrow the 
competitor will not cut the ground from under him. He knows the 
association will not permit the goods to be sold cheaper to-morrow than 
to-day. Mr. Kearney said, “When you have got control of the market 
the dealers will fall over each other to find you.” Why don’t they let 
the trade find you instead of the business men? Another point is this: 
I agree with Mr. Kearney on the question of business ability, but don’t 
you think that the business ability that has been shown by the manage- 


et 


68 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


ment of the Raisin-Growers’ Association of Fresno is equal to the tet eS 


ability of any packer connected with it? Don’t you think the ability 


that Mr. Kearney and the members have shown proves them to be the — 
peers of any men in the business? Why don’t they manage the organiza- 
tion at the other end of the line instead of handing it over to the middle- ve 
men? I don’t mean this as a criticism; I am talking for the things — =) 
that will go to the permanent prosperity of the organization. In my — 
opinion the ability of Mr. Kearney and his associates will force these 


men out of the way and put the goods straight into the BS and cut 
clear of these commissions. 


Mr. KEARNEY. Idon’t think there is much difference between Ny. 


Naftzger and myself on this proposition. I take the ground that we 


.should fit ourselves to do these things well before we undertake to do | 


them at all. We are progressing in our raisin business; we have a 
difficult problem to deal with. We started out with the propos of 
winning over to the combination men who had failed previously to 
combine and who had no faith that they could succeed; and those men 
had been, through previous drought, supported cua helped by the 
packers. Money had been advanced to them, and the people had come 


to lean upon the packers for support. It is not wise in my judgment — 


to come right out boldly and depend upon yourselves, but get what you 


IN 


want gradually, and we have been doing it gradually. At firstwemade — 


a trial, and I solicited the packers to come out and help us; and I say 
that without the assistance of the packers we could not have got along. 
We strengthened ourselves and put up the price on raisins the first 


year, and the grower had a little money to help pay off some of his — 
debts, and we felt stronger. Then we made another trial with the 


packers the next year, and that was more stringent than the previous 
year. We made them agree to buy those raisins and pay our price, no 


matter what it was—whatever price we put upon them. We insisted 


upon their agreeing to it, and they did it. That was a step in advance ~ 


of the previous year. We propose now to go to the packers and say to 
them, ‘‘ You know there is a great deal of friction between us; this man 
is underselling you, and you know you are not making a dollar out of 


it.’ Then we will say, “You have got to come in with us if you want ae 
to make money.” And we propose now to ask them to organize and 


combine their plants, and with the assistance we will render them we 


propose to buy a half interest in that business. Is not that a step in * 


advance? 

QUESTION. Why not buy it all? 

Mr. KEARNEY. I believe that the cautious way is the best way. 
I think we will get there that way quicker than to make a plunge and 


get into the mud. I believe you had better have the packers and com- — 


mission men always under your control, but use their skill and ability — 


Oe 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 69 


to market this product for you until you get so strong that they see 
that they are of no use and they will find something else to do. 
- QUESTION. Are there any codperative packing or seeding plants 
- in Fresno, and what percentage of the business do they do? 
_ Mr. KEARNEY. I think there must be some twelve or fifteen 
_ codperative packing-houses erected in Fresno by one selling agency, 
- and that selling agency also has a connection with a seeding plant; in 
- gome way they are supplied with seeded raisins. The selling agency, 
_ I think, is almost equal to any other agency in the sale of raisins. 
‘They have done good work this year and last; and I think the results 
of their labors as selling agents are quite satisfactory to the members. 
Mr. NAFTZGER. I am not quite satisfied yet. I do not object 
.— specifically to the packers as purely packers. I said in my address 
a that the local association makes any arrangement it pleases about 
packing—lets it out by contract or pays a percentage, or any other way 
to suit themselves, and they are responsible for the result. A poor 
pack is a poor price. My objection is where the packer is the selling 
agent; that is my objection. It seems to me to be the correct policy 
that no man can buy our product cheaper than any other man can buy 
it. ‘The price is alike to both men, with no privileges or dividing of 
commissions. The buyer looks at the goods and buys them for what 
they are and pays his money, and he knows very well that that brand 
-will not be sold at any price less than he pays for it. I am glad to 
know that Mr. Kearney believes that principle to be right, but I believe 
in getting to this thing now by one jump instead of two jumps. 
SENATOR JOHNSTON. I take pleasure in the remark of Mr. Kearney, 
where he said he was not yet ready to give the growers a diploma on 
their merits as good business men. I do not agree, however, with Mr. 
Kearney in his organization plan; I do not agree with my friend on the 
left [meaning Mr. Naftgzer] by taking this in one jump. We must 
4 - educate ourselves and our co-workers and make their prices such as the 
market demands, and then there will be no trouble about having con- 


i 


ES a eee MEE ee OM ae bis 70 pei | ~ a e 
Papeete) 5 oe Ae Dai Sat pe CO ETE yw os pint ee hey, SH ie Cue ple 
4 us Setar e ea wie ty ere Ns idee 
fs ; : aoe 


Sag 
is 
ead 


: sumers. I am not prepared to go into the organization with the middle- 
3 - men; that is the last thing I will agreeto. I think the worst thing 
for the growers of California will be an organization of that kind. Ii 
3 you want the goods of California there is but one man to go to and he 
a fixes the price and we must pay it. The more shippers and packers in 
. _ the country the better it is for the fruit-grower. JI am not prepared to 
3s go into an organization of that kind, especially when they retain con- 

_ trol. We should not attempt to bring the association of growers and 
_ packers together, but the association of growers should control the crop 
and handle the business. So far as the raisin-growers are concerned, 
_ they will make contracts with the packers. You want to get the busi- 
ness in such a shape that there will be no disintegration. The more 


70 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


cutting and slashing you have the more danger you are in. The grower 
can always set up any number of packing-houses upon a month’s 
notice; he is never at the mercy of the packer. I desire to use the 
. skill and ability of the dealer to market our fruits when he will do it 
according to our views and in our interest. That is all the point I wish 
to make. | 3 

Mr. NAFTZGER. So doI, but as a rule he doesn’t. My theory is, 
instead of enabling the speculator to build and own the packing-houses, 
let the association make that percentage of profit and do its own pack- © 
ing. Jam driving at the proposition that the producer paystherevenue 
every time. The producer has to pay all the bills, all the percentages, _ 
all the profits for all the packing-houses and for all the skill that is 
employed. Now, why don’t he employ it directly and pay simply what 
it is worth in the markets without the speculating profits in it? 

QUESTION. Does the Southern Exchange do it that way? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. Yes, wecut them all off at the neck. — 

QUESTION. What does it cost to market your fruit for two suc- 
cessive years ? 3 

Mr. NAFTZGER. It has cost us about three per cent on the sales. 

No other product in California has been marketed at three per cent of 
the cost. 

Mr. KEARNEY. What percentage of the crop of oranges of Cali- — 
fornia has Mr. Naftzger’s association got under its control, and if it” 
had the whole of the crop of California under its control wouldn’t it 
put the price of oranges much higher than they are to-day? a 

Mr. NAFTZGER. Well, I suppose I am expected to answer that. — 
In the first place, in the beginning of our organization we had approxi- - 
mately ninety per cent of the crop, but as I told you yesterday, we had 
it by including all sorts of heresies, isms, and idiosyncrasies. We had 
some of the leading packers and shippers in Southern California in the 
association. They were in the organization, but it would not work; it 
had too many bosses and too many side issues, and too many beliefs 
and opinions. I want to emphasize what Mr. Kearney said about con- 
centrating the power and authority: Don’t imagine that every fellow 
can have his own way. When we cut off those side issues we dropped 
down suddenly in our control of the crop, because we undertook to put 
it on a business basis; we are now steadily increasing our holdings. 

Mr. KEARNEY. What percentage do you control now? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. We have now about thirty-five per cent. 

Mr. BERWICK. Why, Mr. Naftzger, if you are so successful, is it 
that sixty-five per cent still stay outside of your association? 

Mr. NAFTZGER. Well, I thought I had answered that when I 
said we made a market for the sixty-five per cent to get their ready 
money. We have made a market for their fruit and they sell it. 


Nn eee eT ar a a aa 


—, . ae 


eet, Px 


< eed FH 4 ola eo 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. vial 


While we are getting more money, the fellow that is hard up and 


wants ready money will go and make his deal. I am simply talking 


about the success so far aS we are concerned in the association. We 


have only been operating for three years on the present plan, and that 


_ is, selling our goods delivered. I say this: that we are taking care of _ 
the people that are with us better than they were ever taken care of ~ 


before, and getting more money for their oranges than was ever gotten 
before in the history of the orange business. We might possibly by 
some measures increase our holdings, but do not think we could do it 
like Mr. Kearney has done in the raisin business. We do not want to 
give any one control of our business. 

PROF. CHILDS. Those of us who have been trying to organize the 
dried fruit industry have feared this. We have thought that the 
raisin people were right—that in order to control the prices of cured 
prunes we must have at least a combination of seventy-five per cent of 


_ the producers; because in this valley we have several associations and 


they have tried to control the prices of prunes, but the outsiders have 
controlled the prices. 


Printing Mr. Kearney’s Address. 


Mr. NAFTZGER. It seems to me that Mr. Kearney’s address is so 
valuable in its suggestions that it ought to have a permanent place in 
print. That address has a value which I think would be a prominent 
and effective weapon to aid local organization. 

On motion, a committee was appointed, consisting of Judge Lewis, 
Mr. Naftzger, and Mr. Kearney, to report in the afternoon on the cost of 


_ printing said address in pamphlet form, for distribution before the 


adjournment of the convention. 
Recess was then taken until 2:30 o’clock p. m. of this day. 


72 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


AFTERNOON SESSION—THIRD DAY. 


THURSDAY, December 14, 1899. 


At. 2:30 o’clock Pp. M. the convention reassembled. Presi CooPER 


in the chair. 
NEW FRUIT. CREATIONS. 


Essay By LUTHER BURBANK, or SiGen Rosa. 


The time is not far back when perseverance was the usual price of a : 
success, but we now live in a time of great activity and with rapid and, 


astonishing changes in every department of life, which makes adaptability 
of even more importance than perseverance. No one can doubt that 
these facts apply to horticulture, and especially to fruit-growing, for in 
these employments most rapid strides have been made during the last 
ten years of the passing century. The fruit-grower of to-day must have 


the ability to adapt himself to new methods, new fruits, and new mar- 


kets. By means of cold storage and rapid transit, the finest fruit from 


every land can be found in any large market both in and out of sea- 


son, for while the fruits of one hemisphere are first waking from their 
winter sleep, in the other the summer sun has done its work and the 
ripened fruits are on their way to distant markets. 

With the world as a market, competition is keen, and only the best 
fruits in the best condition will pay; fortunately, it generally costs much 


less per ton to produce large, first-class fruit than to produce the poorest 


and meanest specimens that are ever offered. Small fruit exhausts the 
tree much more rapidly than large fruit, as one pound of skin, stones, 
and seeds represents at least ten or twelve pounds of fruit pulp; it will 
thus readily be seen that improved varieties, which produce uniformly 
large, fine fruit, are more economical manufacturers of fruit, and also 


that the product is always more salable; the difference in many cases — 


will decide between success and failure. 


The tree which needs a great deal of pruning to keepit in proper form 2 


or vigorous health should be replaced by one which has a better habit 
of growth, for every ton of wood taken unnecessarily from an orehard 
represents at least as much in weight of fruit. What a fearful tax this 


alone is on the fruit-grower—enough wasted here also to make the 


difference between success and failure. 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 73 


3 _ Many varieties have two or three superior qualities, but wofully lack 
in many others; some have a very weak and imperfect root systen, no 
- matter on what stock they may be grafted; others have scanty foliage, 
_ which readily falls a prey to drought or to fungous or insect enemies. 
Others are especially subject. to blossom blight by late spring frosts, . 
parching winds, or rain; still others, though bearing the best of fruit, 
___— are so sparing of it that they are outstripped by others of less value. 
- Numerous other faults are too well known to all observing fruit-growers. 
a The fruit-grower of to-day is strictly a manufacturer and should have 
the latest and best improvements. The manufacturer of pins and nails 
would not long tolerate a machine which failed to produce pins and 
_ nails every other season, or one which produced even occasionally an 
___ ill assorted, rusty, unmarketable product. And revolutionary as it may 
at first thought appear, there is no good reason for permanently produc- 
ing poor fruit, for in time new trees will be produced which will produce 
good fruit with the utmost regularity and precision. Of course, there 
never can be one variety which will be the best for all purposes, but it 
is perfectly possible to produce varieties which, for their own special 
use, can be relied upon to produce full crops of the best fruit without 
fail; all this must be done by careful selection and breeding. 

With our present knowledge more advancement can be made in ten 
years than could be obtained in as many centuries by the usual custom 
for ages past of selecting chance seedlings as they appear here and 
there. Professor Bailey truly says: “Intelligent selection, having in 
mind an ideal form, is man’s nearest approach to the Creator in his 

dealings with the organic world”; and Darwin, that ‘“‘The key is, man’s 

power of accumulative selection.” Both might have said combination 

and selection, for in practical field work it is first necessary to combine 

the best qualities of two or more species or varieties before selection can 

ever be of much value. When the combination has been judiciously 

made, the work of centuries can be done in as many years; and with 

the further knowledge that when an organism is removed from its old 

restraining agencies and given every advantage in the new ones, all 

variations have an opportunity of asserting themselves, the work 
___ becomes still more simplified in the hands of the operator. 

By the application of these well-known scientific facts to practical, 
everyday field work, results have lately been obtained which are noth- 
ing less than astounding, and we may expect to see as great advance- 
ment in the production of horticultural wonders as has been seen in 

the mechanical and chemical application of electricity. 

By request I here discuss the merits and defects of some of my own 
fruit productions and introductions. Among the first plums which were 
__ imported and introduced from my establishment, Abundance, Burbank, - 
Sweet Botan, and Satsuma are the best: known. 


74 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


Abundance and Burbank thrive almost everywhere, generally resist- — 
ing spring frosts while in bloom. Burbank is now grown extensively in 
every country where plums are grown and in some places where no 
other plum will thrive. In South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand 
-it is planted by the hundred thousand and is generally spoken of as 
the most reliable and profitable of all plums for canning, shipping, 
and home use. Abundance, though not of as high quality, gives univer- 
sal and unbounded satisfaction. 

Sweet Botan, though not as well adapted to general culture in aJl 
places, is grown for home use and for near markets far and wide. | 
Satsuma, though nearly or quite a failure in some places, is a grand 
success in others as the standard shipping, canning, and jelly plum. 


All these, except the Burbank, are greatly surpassed in productive- 


ness, size, beauty, and quality by the newer hybrids and crossbreds 
produced since 1890, and mentioned below: 

- Giant Prune. This was introduced in 1893 as a market and ship- 
ping variety, but it has also proved to be one of the very best of canning 
plums, and is rapidly coming into prominence, not only in California, 
but in the Eastern and Central States and the Southern Hemisphere. 
The tree is a good grower and constant and abundant producer. 

Wickson. Introduced at the same time, is now universally grown, 
and wherever offered in any market has a readier sale and brings a 
higher price than any plum ever before known. Growers who invested 
in this variety have made large profits, as it has found a ready sale at 
prices never before realized for any plum. 

Gold. Sold to Stark Brothers, Louisiana, Mo., and introduced the 
same season, was recommended as the largest of the hardy varieties for 
the cold Northern States, and it has proved hardier, larger, better, and 
more valuable than claimed. As better varieties can be grown in our 
mild climate, I do not specially recommend it for California. 

Splendor. Introduced by the same firm. In some places this has 
not met with favor, on account of its having to be picked instead of 
dropping when ripe like the Petite prune, and for this very reason is 
prized by others, who claim that the difference in expense of gathering 
is more than made up by the better product. It shrinks slightly more 
than the Petite, but even then runs larger and is of much better quality 
for cooking. The tree is a heavier and more regular bearer, but has now 
been eclipsed by the Sugar prune in productiveness, earliness, size, 
flavor, sweetness, and value of product when cured. | 

Shipper. Sold to and introduced by John Lewis Childs, of New 
York. It is particularly valuable on account of its firm flesh; is a 
large, handsome, apple-shaped plum, ripening at mid-season. ue 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 19 


Delaware. Sold to same party. It is a very dwarf plum in tree but 


not in fruit, which ripens very early and is large, delicious, and 


abundant. No better plum is to be found for early home use. 

Hale. Sold to J. H. Hale, of South Glastonbury, Conn. A tre- 

mendous bearer. The fruit is of size, form, color, and quality of 

Imperial Gage. Stone much smaller, one of the Japanese varieties. 
Apple. Mid-season, extremely large. Stem, form, color, and general 

appearance of an apple. Rich reddish purple; flesh firm, pale red, 

with marblings of pink, rich, high flavored, sweet or subacid; tree 


_ vigorous and productive. One of the best for shipping or any other 


purpose. 

America. Of the same parentage and similar to Gold, but five or six 
weeks earlier. 

Chalco. A cross of Prunus Simoni and Burbank. The fruit, which 
ripens just before the Burbank, is large, flat like a tomato, reddish pur- 
ple, sweet, firm, fragrant, with yellow flesh and small seed. Simoni 
will never be grown for any purpose where this is known, for in every 
possible respect it is its superior. 

Pearl. A seedling of the French prune, much ee skin white; 
flesh semi-transparent, very sweet and aromatic; about a month earlier 
than the French prune, but more difficult to cure. Especially valuable 
for home use. 

October Purple. Introduced by Hoyt’s Sons, New Canaan, Conn. It. 


1s a very productive, deep purple plum of the Japanese type, ripening 


very late in the season; of most excellent quality and a good shipper. 

Sugar prune, Climax, Sultan, Bartlett, and Shiro plums, all intro- 
duced last season, need no special mention at this time, as they have 
yet to make their record outside the confines of my own grounds. I 
can only add that they are the cream of all the hundreds of thousands 
of the best hybrid and cross-bred plums with which I have been labor- 
ing constantly for the past sixteen years. I do not say that better 
ones will not be produced, for I have no doubt there will be; but at 
present I would plant none but these. As I am requested to come here 
to answer your questions regarding them, I need say no more, and can 


only hope that they may prove to be even more valuable to the 


grower, shipper, and consumer than have been those which have already 
left my hands to receive the test of various soils, markets, and uses, 


- and the greater test of time. 


It has been well said that it were better for a man that a millstone 
be hung around his neck and that he be cast into the sea than that he 
should introduce a fruit or flower which should prove to be of no value. 
In the introduction of a new fruit or flower no one who has not been 
through the experience can fully appreciate the sense of responsibility, 
and no one can more deeply lament a failure than the introducer. 


76 : OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


The reception given my own introductions of the past leaves” no o great 


fear of the future in that respect. 


It would take too much time even briefly to describe the bores ee 
quinces, and other fruit and nut trees which originated and have bean 


sent out from my grounds since 1890. 


OPUNTIA FICUS -INDICA. Z 


Prof. E. E. Smrru, of Palo Alto, exhibited specimens of the plant and a 


fruit of the cactus Opuntia ficus-indica, and explained its economic 
importance. 


REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION. — 


Jupce Lewis, chairman of the committee on the publication of Mr. 
Kearney’s address, reported for the committee, recommending the print- 


ing of 20,000 copies of said address in papal! form. 


The report of the committee was adopted, and sufficient fund sub: = 


scribed to defray the expense of printing, etc. 


THE ASSOCIATE CALIFORNIA FRUIT EXPORTERS. 
Report of the Committee on Legislation, Etc. 


B. N. Row ey, of San Francisco, chairman of the Committee on Legis- 


lation, Inspection, and Quarantine Laws of the “Associate California = 


Fruit Exporters,” submitted the following: 


Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Convention: 
At the request of your Committee on Program, I herewith present a brief report of 


ba 


the labors of the Committee on Legislation, Masi and Quarantine Laws of the _ 


‘‘A'ssociate California Fruit Exporters.” 
This association was formed for the purpose of investigating and overcoming, if possi- 
ble, some of the difficulties met with both at home and abroad by the exporters of Cali- 


‘fornia cured fruits. As you all know, California cured fruits have now become quite — 
popular in England and Continental Europe. The first direct shipments of any con- — 


sequence went forward in 1894, consisting chiefly of apricots. The excellent quality of 


the fruit shipped attracted very general attention, and the demand from Europe wid- 


ened, and prunes, pears, and peaches were largely added to the list which went forward 
in 1895. In 1896 the demand showed a material increase, and heavy direct shipments 
were made. In 1897 upward of 1,000 carloads went forward. In 1898 the short fruit crop 


in California, combined with the close inspection by German officers, curtailed the export — 
movement in all lines except prunes, the latter being exempt from the attention of 


inspectors. 


During the six months commencing June 1 and ending December 31, 1898, export rte 
shipments from the Santa Clara Valley alone aggregated 8,580,000 pounds, or 429 ten- — 
ton cars, of which about 7,000,000 pounds were prunes. This fruit went forward in car 
lots on through bills of lading, and was distributed in England, Germany, ve Bel- ea 


Ret 


gium, Holland, Scotland, Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. 


ae, 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. we livi 


_ The export field for California cured fruits has widened materially, and the demand is 
on the increase. The shipments for the season of 1899 will exceed in quantity any year 
_gince the export business began. Early in 1898 the German government, at the request 
of the Agricultural Society of Berlin, began to place restrictions on the importations of 

fruit from America, claiming that both fresh and cured fruit from this country was 
infected with San José scale and other insect pests, and that the free admission of this 
fruit into Germany would place the fruit industry of that country in imminent danger. 
_ Rigid inspection was therefore had of all shipments arriving at German ports and 
_ frontier stations, and upon afew shipments of California cured unpeeled pears there 
_ were found, as a matter of record, specimens of San José scale—dead of course, but San 
_ José scale nevertheless. This discovery led to a temporary exclusion of both fresh 
and cured fruits, but. a vigorous protest on the part of our Government finally raised 
the embargo. The German inspectors, however, persisted in making an examination 
of all fruit shipments, particularly those from California. This caused California fruit- 
shippers a great deal of trouble and annoyance and some loss of money by haying to 
reship all fruit held up by the German inspectors to some other country where it might 
be sold. The bulk of such shipments was disposed of in England. 

The unsatisfactory condition of affairs caused the large San Francisco exporters to 
calla meeting for the purpose of devising ways and means to meet, and overcome if 
possible, these serious difficulties. The first meeting was held on Tuesday, December 
13th, in the office of Messrs. Castle Bros. There were present at this meeting repre- 

sentatives of the following fruit-exporting firms: The J. K. Armsby Co., Porter Bros. 
& Co., Rosenberg Bros. & Co., Castle Bros., California Fruit Evaporating Co., Johnson- 
Locke Mercantile Co., and Guggenhime & Co. Mr. J. A. Filcher, of the California 
State Board of Trade, and B. N. Rowley, of the ‘‘ California Fruit-Grower,’’ were also 
present. This meeting resulted in the organization of the Associate California Cured 
Fruit Exporters. 
' After a very general discussion of the entire situation, the conclusion was reached 
that the German government was following very closely in the footsteps of the fruit 
quarantine inspectors in America, and particularly in California, for it is well known 
that the latter had been keeping a very close watch upon infected trees and plants to 
guard against the introduction of dangerous insect pests into this country. Hence, it 
was thought well to commence the work of reform at home by the appointment of a 
permanent committee, which consisted of B. N. Rowley, o C. Kinsey, and M. 
Loewenstein. 
This committee was instructed to undertake the work of soriducting a more thorough 
investigation and to assist in perfecting the fruit quarantine laws of this State, and to 
_ render aid in all matters pertaining to fruit legislation and inspection of fruit intended 
for export trade. This committee held frequent meetings and sought the advice of 
Mr. Alexander Craw, the present Horticultural Quarantine Officer, B. M. Lelong, Secre- 
tary of the State Board of Horticulture, and many others prominently identified with 
the fruit industry of California. 
2 After consulting with the San Francisco commission tarehamts and fruit receivers, 
, this committee arrived at the conclusion that it would be impracticable, if not impossi- 
a ble, to undertake the inspection of fresh fruits prior to their being shipped to foreign 
- countries, to say nothing of the task of inspecting cured fruit before shipping. Thus 
far the difficulty in Germany and Switzerland has arisen over fresh apples and cured 
unpeeled pears shipped into those countries. 

Fruit, fresh or cured, except prunes, arriving from America at any German port is 
inspected, and if found infected with scale, dead or alive, is refused entry, and ordered 
__reshipped to some other country. Such consignments have heretofore been generally 

reshipped to England and there sold. Fully recognizing the importance of retaining 
the German markets for California cured fruits, and at the same time recognizing the - 

legitimate action on the part of the German government in its efforts to keep out. 

injurious insect pests, as the German laws and methods are perhaps less stringent than 

our own, this committee sought to reach the root of the evil by as direct a route as 
_ possible—that of destroying the home market for scaly infected fruit, thereby rendering 
it mecessary for the grower to have his orchard inspected, and making it obligatory for 
: him to rid his orchard of seale and other insect pests. 


2 s 


. my 
on 


78 > OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


With this object in view the committee had prepared a bill, which was submitted to 
several competent attorneys, besides those connected with the fruit quarantine and —__ 
inspection departments of the State Board of Horticulture, and after receiving their 
approval, this bill was placed in the hands of Assemblyman Arnerich, and became 
known as Assembly Bill No. 158. The committee made several trips to Sacramento, and 
was successful in securing the passage of the bill through both houses of the Legislature. 

The committee desires to thank at this time the Hon. Alden Anderson, Speaker of 
the Assembly, Mr. Ralph Hersey, Manager of the California Dried Fruit Agency of San - 
José, Mr. B. M. Lelong, Secretary of the State Board of Horticulture, Mr. J. A. Filcher, 
Manager of the State Board of Trade, and others, for their earnest codperation and 
assistance. 

We met our defeat at the hands of Governor Gage, for, when the bill which had been 
passed by the Senate and Assembly reached the Governor late on February 24th, his 
Excellency saw fit to promptly return it to the Assembly on the next morning, with 
his disapproval. The last paragraph but one in Governor Gage’s lengthy veto reads as_ 
follows: ‘‘Something on the lines of Assembly Bill No. 158 should receive careful 
attention; and I trust that a law may be framed covering all its beneficial features, 
without the radical objections herein mentioned, and that you may take the bill up and 
act upon it as an urgency measure.”’ 

The committee acted upon the Governor’s suggestion and prepared a second bill, 
which was so much like the first one that it was difficult to tell one from the other, with 
the exception that the second bill, known as Assembly Bill No. 1003, provided that the 
Governor should biennially appoint, etc., while the original bill, No. 158, provided that 
the State Board of Horticulture should biennially appoint. This change in the bill 
virtually made it an Executive measure, and it went sailing through the Assembly and — 
Senate as an urgency measure, and again reached the Governor two days after its 
introduction, and in time for his official signature. But for reasons not necessary to 
detail at this time the bill was never signed. Thus the labors of this committee and its 
friends in behalf of the much needed legislation for the better protection of our fruit 
industry were consigned to the Governor’s waste-paper basket. . 

The object sought through the labors of the committee was to prevent the shipping 
of scaly and infected fruit out of the county where grown, and in this manner prevent 
the transportation of insect pests from one part of the State to another, and at the 
same time destroy the market for wormy, scaly fruit. This would naturally compel 
growers With infested orchards to commence the cleaning-up process, and in time rid 
their several orchards of scale and insect pests. 

It was the further intention to cause the inspection of each orchard in the State by 
competent State officers, who would make and preserve official records of all orchards 
inspected, and issue certificates to all owners of orchards found free from scale, and at 
the same time furnish a full, complete report to the office of the State Board of Horti- ad 
culture as to the condition of the various orchards, variety of scale and other insect 
pests discovered by them. This record was to have been kept in such a form as to be 
available for the use of buyers of fruit, both fresh and cured, for export purposes, and 
reports would have been issued to the large exporting houses from time to time, 
furnishing them with information whereby they could with safety buy fruit and export 
it, knowing that upon its arrival in Germany, or elsewhere, it would not be held up as 
scale-infected. By this method the trees in the orchard would have been inspected — 
instead of the fruit, as at first suggested, it being considered a much simpler and more 
practicable way of arriving at the solution of the insect-pest problem ; for, if the trees in 
the orchard are free from scale and insect pests, the fruit would certainly be sound and 
perfect and free from scale, and buyers would take no chance in purchasing cured pears 
or other fruits from such inspected. orchards. 

This committee is of the opinion that the matter should be given careful considera- 
tion by the members of this convention, and such action had as will bring about this 
very desirable end. 


On motion, the report was received, and the thanks of the convention 
tendered the committee. eae 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS CONVENTION. (es 


DANGEROUS PESTS QUARANTINED BY THE STATE BOARD 
OF HORTICULTURE. 


“Stopped at the Threshold.” 
Essay By ALEXANDER CRAW, State HorricuLTuRAL QUARANTINE OFFICER. 


Mr. CHAIRMAN, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: Of the steamers and sailing 
vessels that arrived in the port of San Francisco from foreign countries 
since my last report to the State Board of Horticulture, 122 had trees, 
plants, or fruit. They were from China, Japan, Ceylon, Australia, New 
Zealand, South Sea Islands, Philippine Islands, Hawaiian Islands, Cen- 
tral America, and Mexican ports. Imports consisted of: 

314 cases and crates of trees and plants. 
573 boxes and bundles of trees and plants. 
149 loose lots of trees and plants. 
864 crates and sacks of pineapple plants for Florida. 
10,809 boxes of limes. 
3,054 boxes of Japanese Unshiu oranges. 
100 crates and 10 boxes of oranges from San José del Cuba. 
2,360 boxes of mangoes, alligator pears, etc. 
2,367 crates of pineapples. 
All fumigated with hydrocyanic acid gas. 
3,302 fruit trees and ornamental plants were destroyed, as they were 
infested with insects new to the State. 

It is not necessary to enumerate the destructive insect pests that have 
damaged the orchards and perplexed the orchardists of California, but 
it is not generally known that nearly if not all of them are introduced 


species. Less than three decades ago, the orchards and gardens of the 


State were very free from insect pests; such an apparatus as a spray 
pump was almost unknown; and a fumigating outfit had never been 
heard of. The Spanish padres saw the possibilities of our soil and - 
climate for fruit culture, and experimented in a small way on lands 
adjoining their Mission buildings. Their young plantations were nearly 


all raised from seed, and were protected from the roaming herds of cattle 
_ by hedges of opuntia, a species of tall-growing cactus, with flat spiny 


leaves, bearing edible fruit, known as prickly pears, which were much 
relished by the Indians of the southern counties. Some of the Missions 
had more pretentious barricades for the protection of their trees and vines 
in well-built adobe walls. These orchards were thrifty and clean. Some 
of the more enterprising pioneers who came to California before the 
“days of gold” planted trees as a business proposition, and these, like 
the Mission trees, were erly all seedlings or propagated from the ~ 
Mission trees. 


80 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


With the change of government and the rapid it increase of population, 


through the discovery of gold, a good home market was created and — 


orchard planting made rapid strides. The enterprising Americans 


determined to have and grow the best fruits known, so imported trees os 
and plants from other countries, and with them came the pests. The 
natural enemies of the latter were left behind in their native countries or _ 
died on the way, so the scale bugs and other pests had a clear field ands 


spread rapidly. Unfortunately for the good name of California, some 


of the pests were first scientifically described and named here, and ae 


popular names were given that conveyed the impression to outsiders 


that the insects were natives of this State. 


The State Board of Horticulture was created by an Act of the Lae 22 


lature to look after the fruit interests, and the Governor was given the 
power to appoint the members. This Board was given authority to 


make regulations for the purpose of preventing the spread of fruit tree — 
pests, and a subsequent Act gave it the appointment of an officer to 


attend to quarantine work. 


I will briefly give you a list of some of the pests that have been | 


stopped at the threshold during the time that the Board has honored 
me with this appointment. 


Each of the fruit-growing counties, as you are aware, has he power, 


through its Supervisors, when petitioned, to appoint a Cones Board of 
Horticulture that works in conjunction with the State Board in prevent- 
ing the introduction of infested trees into its districts by rail. Where 
the county officers have received the support of their Supervisors, good 


work has been done, and the courts have sustained us. Ninety per cent 
more money has been spent in trying to stamp out pests that were 


formerly introduced into the State than has been expended in keeping 
others out, and then we do not compute the enormous damage and loss 
caused by their presence. 

-When the quarantine regulations were enforced, various interests and 
supposed rights came in conflict with them, and for a time we worked 


along paths not strewn with flowers. Even now we run against bellicose 


individuals who think we have no right to interfere with anything they 
may bring. They finally conclude that we have the better of the anes 
ment, and retire, although not always gracefully. 


One of the most amusing incidents in my work was upon the arrival | 


of an old Scotch lady, who had been to Scotland on a visit and came — 


back by way of the Northern Pacific and steamer from theSound. When 
she came down the gang plank of the steamer, I noticed something 


familiar and remarked that I wanted to look at her plants. She was — 


delighted that they should so soon attract attention upon their arrival, 


and began to explain to me how much care she had bestowed on them © se 


on the long voyage across the Atlantic and the great American conti- 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 81 


nent. They were in pots and one was just then coming into bloom, so 
there was no question regarding its identity. She was terribly shocked 
when I informed her that I would have to destroy them. She pleaded 
that she would keep them in her own garden. We haveall the varieties 
SS of thistles we want, so she lost her pets and insinuated that I had no 
patriotism. The Scotch thistle was introduced into Australia and over- 
'  ranthat country. Laws were enacted to have it stamped out, but the 
__thistles are there yet. 
In referring to the various pests, I will refrain from giving you the 
_ _ scientific names of each and give you the popular names. If, however, 
you are in doubt regarding any of them, I will be pleased to give it also. 
; Australia is the land that gave to California, Cape Colony, and Por- 
__ tugal the terrible ‘‘cottony cushion scale” (Icerya purchasi). We are 
-- also indebted to it for the destructive “‘red scale” (Aspidiotus aurantit) 
of the orange. From that country and Samoa came orange trees and | 
fruit infested with small “snow scales” (Chionaspis citri), a species 
that is reported to have been the cause of the decay of the old orange 
trees in Louisiana. The trees and fruit that arrive infested with 
this scale are always destroyed. I will here state that trees and 
plants infested with pests not existing in the State are destroyed or 
_ deported. If the stock is infested with insects already found in Califor- 
- nia, it is thoroughly fumigated with hydrocyanic acid gas, unless the 
- insects are of a serious nature and not found in the district to which 
__the stock is destined. All those I mention having quarantined have 
been destroyed. 
A long scale (Lecaniwm longalium), belonging to the same family as 
the “brown apricot scale” (Lecaniwm armeniacwm), and one like the 
~ common black scale, but jet black and smooth, came from Australia and 
- Hawaiian Islands. — : 
_ A shipment of apples came from Tasmania, via Australia, that were 
__ attacked by a small beetle larve that burrowed through the pulp under 
_ the skin. Two loads of four-foot pine wood were piled about the boxes, 
= over all was poured coal oil, and soon we had quite an apple bake. 
Oranges from the Island Continent that were attacked by a skin fungus 
were also disposed of. 
_ A pest of a more conspicuous nature came from the same country. 
This was a flying-fox. It measured fourteen inches and had a wing- 
spread of three feet two inches, and belonged to the fruit-eating bats. 
When it arrived it was enjoying a breakfast of ripe pears and banana. 
In countries where they exist, great expense is incurred in protecting 
soft fruit from their attacks. They live in great colonies during the 
_ daytime, suspended from the branches of trees, and at night they sally 
_ forth and are known to fly for over twenty miles in quest of fruit. That 


6—BH 


PT atl 


« » a — Pees Ma re ‘ y 

- * NS Oe ee 
, : ; + Op aa 

are gees: a 


82 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


flying-fox and four others that afterward came from China were treated 


with sufficient chloroform to stop all further desire on their part for such 


toothsome food as ripe fruit. The owners, of course, tried to prevent “a 


such summary disposal of their bats. 


Japan, like Australia, has furnished us with several neces that have ey 
caused orchardists to expend large sums of money in keeping their trees 


in a healthy condition. Besides the citrus “‘snow scale” (Chionaspis 
citri), a very serious small white-armored scale (Diaspis amygdali) is 


altogether too frequently found upon trees and. plants from that country. — 
This is a pest we can take no chances with, owing to the fact that the — 


best known tree washes of treble strength will only kill seven per cent 
of them. Orchardists will understand that very few fruit trees will 


stand such a strength, and the result of such an application is almost 


as destructive to the trees as the scale. We have found this scale upon — 


the following trees and plants, which were destroyed. I will give the 


names of the trees in the order, as to the extent, in which we have found — 


them to be infested: Cherry, plum, peach, persimmon, tea bushes, and 
walnut, besides “sago palms” (Cycas revoluta) and a variety of other 


ornamental plants. The Japanese are experts in the manufacture of 


artificial cherry blossoms, and to add to the deception they use fresh 


cherry twigs, upom which we sometimes find live scale. The only danger, © 


of course, from such imports would be the use of the artificial flowers 

with decorative plants that could be infested in this way. — | 
The legal fight against the importation of 325,000 orange trees from 

Tahiti that were landed at San Pedro is well known. The“ mining 


scales” (Howardia biclavis) infesting those trees withstood five fumiga- _ 


tions with hydrocyanic acid gas; also two treatments by dipping in 
strong insecticide, and the trees were finally ordered by the Superior 
Court of Los Angeles County to be burned.. It would be impossible to 
destroy this pest if it ever obtained a foothold in the orchards of this 
State. We have destroyed trees and plants from Southern Mexico that 
were infested with this scale. 

A San José gentleman, who has a coffee plantation at Soconusco, 
Mexico, near the border of Guatemala, arrived by steamer in San 
Francisco and brought a bundle of cuttings of “cape jasmine” (Gar- 
denia florida). Upon examination I found these cuttings to be infested 
with the “mining scale.” He brought them to propagate in San José 
in order to raise more plants, as he was afraid his large bush was going 


~ 


to die. The cause of the plants’ sickly condition was pointed out to him 


and his cuttings were burned. 
A tea-grower in Ceylon wrote and forwarded a dry sample of a Spee 


from one of his tea bushes. We found it badly infested with the “mining — 


scale.” He reported that half of his plantation was attacked by this 
scale and the yield of tea was reduced in that portion over half. Two 


va a se 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 83 


club-like structures in the last segment of this scale distinguished it 
from all other known coccids. 

Three species of ‘fringed scale” (Astero lecanium) came from Central 
America and Honolulu. This scale, when located on the wood, causes 
a depression and gives the tree a rough, warty appearance. 

A few years ago a very pretty red wax scale was found occasionally 
on plants from Honolulu, introduced there from India. It must be more 
numerous about Honolulu now, for we find it on a great variety of 
plants. The evergreen wreaths with which the Hawaiians decorate — 
their departing friends are also infested, so we never allow such decora- 
tions to pass. A lady passenger was detected by-a customs officer trying 
to smuggle a plant ashore under her cape, and in explanation she 


informed me that it was a fern she got on the top of the mountains. 


When I examined the plant I accused her of misinforming me regarding 


_where she obtained it. She inquired how I knew, so I pointed out the 
“red wax scale” that is only found near Honolulu. With a blush she 


acknowledged it. Her plant was destroyed. 

I desire to publicly express the indebtedness of the State Board of 
Horticulture to the United States customs service of San Francisco for 
their valuable assistance in preventing the landing of any trees, plants, 


_ or fruit from foreign countries. Nothing can now be smuggled in the 


baggage or taken ashore during the day or night unless an officer of the 
Board of Horticulture is present. An amusing incident occurred. on 


‘board a steamer from the tropics. A member of the crew tried to pass 


a pineapple and was stopped at the foot of the gang plank by a customs 
inspector and ordered to take it on board again until it had been exam- 


‘ined. He became abusive and said he would take the pineapple ashore 


and the inspector could not stop him. He returned to the head of the 
gang plank, peeled the pineapple and ate it, then triumphantly marched 


~ ashore. 


From Japan comes a “white wax scale” belonging to the same genus 
as the “red wax scale” in India and Honolulu. It also isa very general 
feeder, as we find it on deciduous trees, citrus trees, camellias and other — 


ornamental stock. From Japan came a long, narrow, dark “thread 


scale” (Ischnaspis filiformis), also a “double scale” (Aspidiotus duplex); 
the latter attacks orange trees and other plants. 

Two very near relatives of the so-called “‘San José scale” came from 
the same country, and it may be that we received the latter scale from 
Japan in the early seventies, although it is known to exist in Chili. 

From the land of the Mikado came cherry trees in pots, the young 
wood of which was completely covered with biuish-gray aphis that pro- | 
duced so much honey-dew that the leaves were sticky and coated with 
black fungus. They were new to the State, so the trees and aphis were 


- destroyed. 


84 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


A curiosity in the scale line came on Japanese bamboo plants. The 
scales themselves were partly hidden under the base of the leaves, but 
a very pretty curved, brittle, glassy, threadlike tube about an inch long 
protruded from the body of each scale. A Pleasanton lady on her return ihe 
from Japan had a very pretty split bamboo cage in which weresomegreen __ 


lettuce leaves. Upon inquiring what the cage contained, she replied, “Oh, 


I have some of the dearest little Japanese song crickets you ever saw, __ 


and the steward has given me fresh lettuce and fruit for them every day.” es £ 
I felt sorry for the lady, but had no sympathy for her pets, as they 
would have helped themselves to fresh fruit and other plant growths if ea. 


they had unfortunately gained their liberty in California. 


Upon another occasion the Chinese Ambassador had a similar cage f 


with a very large species of katydid, that, like the song crickets, met a 
violent death. 


Our discoveries have added a great many scales to “ Cockerill’s Check a : 


List/of Coccide” that were new to science. Besides these pests, a good | 


many leaf-eating caterpillars and beetles, leaf miners, stem and twig | 


borers, etc., have been destroyed. 


A pest similar to the codling moth damages apples in Japan and ne? 
secured a foothold in Victoria, British Columbia. A cabin passenger 


from Japan had some apples, which were confiscated, as they had evi- 


dence of the work of the pests. The worms burrow all through the fruit, — 
but while none were found in this instance, their work was‘evident and — i 


the apples were destroyed. 
A very serious and disgusting pest was found in cucumbers from 


Honolulu. This was the maggots of the fly that destroys cucumbers, — 
melons, and squash. This pest was introduced into Honolulu some 
three years ago, and last year it was stated that seventy-five per cent of © 
such products were destroyed by these maggots. The importers were 


notified that no such stock would in future be allowed to come into the : : 
State. The then Secretary of Agriculture of Hawaii, in a letter said: 


““T have no desire to introduce this, or any other pest, into California, — 


or see any one else do so, but believe ordinary inspection at your port 
by a competent person will be a sufficient safeguard, if all specimens of 
fruit that show they are infected when they arrive are destroyed. * * * 


I will state we shall feel satisfied that any of the products are clean before a 


shipment, if for no other than the fact they would not have any value 


in the market. We propose to grow these products under glass if nec- 
essary to get clean fruit, and you can depend that we will not knowingly ~ 

send any other, and all that we ask is that our shipments have a fair 
show.” In reply I wrote him: “We have no time to microscopically 


examine every melon, cucumber, and squash that may come here from 
the Islands for eggs or newly hatched larve of the pest. I would there- 


fore advise you to devote your attention to the cultivation of other os 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 85 


products if you desire to market them i in California. Statements in your 
letter are not assuring, and to benefit ‘the Island anions we cannot 
‘jeopardize our own growers by admitting such products.” They must 
have taken the hint, for no more cucumbers, melons, or squash have 
been received. The same pest was subsequently received from Japan, 
so I believe the Hawaiians got the pest from there. 

- The State of Oregon lost over $300,000 in one year from the damage 
done their hop crop by the hop louse. Last spring two shipments, 
numbering 152,000 hop plants, were received from Kent, England. As 
_ the hop yards of Kent are known to be infested with the hop louse, we 
refused to allow the plants to be distributed, so they were deported to 
a, State where they already have the pest. 

-- The stoppage and death of a pair of mongooses from India is probably 
known to most of you. Another one came a few weeks ago from 
- Manila and met the same fate. This animal looks like a large squirrel, 
and is death to all ground game and domestic fowls, and also eats eggs. 
- ‘They are also reported “to destroy young pigs, kids, lambs, kittens, pup- 
pies, rats, snakes, lizards, and frogs.” 

Regarding the destruction of the first pair, Mr. Dabney, the then 
Assistant Secretary of Agriculture, wrote: ‘“‘If the mongoose once gains 
a foothold in California, it will probably increase rapidly, and the dam- 
age resulting from the destruction of small mammals and insectivorous 
birds, and the consequent increase of insect pests, will be incalculable.” 

The “ Morelos,” or “ Mexican orange maggot,” has made its appearance 
in Acapulco, Mexico. Very few oranges are received from Southern 
Mexican ports, but an invoice of eight cases, equal to sixteen boxes, - 

arrived on the steamship ‘‘Colon” from Acapulco on the 19th of Novem- 
ber, and was unloaded the following day. Upon examination we found 
the fruit to be infested with the above disgusting pest, so we had the fruit 
and cases cremated. This is one of the fruit-flies that in the larve 
state destroy fresh fruit. This species confines its attacks to the orange. 
The parent fly deposits her eggs in the pores of the orange peel; when 
the young maggots hatch they burrow all through the pulp of the fruit 
and are difficult to detect, as they are nearly of the same color as the pulp 
and give little, if any, outward indication of their presence. We found 
a from three to fifteen maggots in a single fruit. When full grown they 
- measure about half an inch; they then leave the fruit and enter the 
ground, where they change to the chrysalis stage and undergo their 
3 _ change and come forth as perfect flies, ready to spread to other trees and 
___ deposit their eggs on the fruit. 

_ Im preserving specimens of the maggots for the cabinet, we put a 
number of them into ninety-five per cent alcohol and were astonished 
_ to notice their vitality. The first to succumb was after they had been 
completely submerged for twelve minutes, and at the end of forty-two 


BTA aN he AX 5 FES gee ge geo 
SAS ta SME Ag ee eT ee 
force Soe fa eee 
ae i " of giant sarees 


abt te! reais Fite ha | 
.' SF Se et 


> mabe ad 
; Se A 
* > 


86 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE: PROCEEDINGS OF THE x ae 


minutes several still had sufficient life to raise half of their body as if 


in an effort to escape. No more oranges will be admitted from there. 
Such a pest established in California would soon seriously influence cas 
sale and consumption of our oranges. 

Before concluding, I desire that fruit-growers in the various counties ; 
petition their Supervisors to extend to their county horticultural com- 
’ missioners all the aid they can; and in counties where no commissioners 


have been appointed, see that good competent men are immediately 


selected and appointed to look after importations of trees and plants by 
- rail from east of the “Rockies.” In so doing you will protect your own 
property, and the State Board of Horticulture, through its regulations 
and the State laws, will extend to you its support. 


BIRDS AS BENEFACTORS TO THE FARMER AND 
FRUIT-GROWER. 


as By W. OTTO EMERSON, or Haywarps. 


From an economic ain of view, the value of bird life and the rela- 
tion of the birds to the farmer and fruit-grower cannot be over-estimated. 
They play the part of an important factor in the preservation of 
fruit from the depredations of insect pests, and as such should have the 
fullest protection from orchardists. Their economic value was not 
investigated to any extent until some ten years ago, when the United 
States Department of Agriculture formed a Division of Economic 
Ornithology for the scientific and careful examination of the food of 
birds. 

Since that time bulletins have been regularly issued on the beneficial 
birds found throughout the United States. Of: the 13,000 species of 
birds known to science, about 1,000 are known to North America. Of 
the land birds, there are some 360 which live entirely on insects; 630 
live more or less on insect life; while nearly 100 depend entirely on such 
food as the seeds of weeds and wild grain, the year round. 

Birds occupy a secondary place in the scale of life (animals occupying 
the first) and are most closely related to the reptiles, as we find the 
earlier types having teeth—representatives of the early Jurassic period. 


Birds are found at home from pole to pole, equally content whether on — 


ocean wave, in Arctic snows, on arid deserts, or in the dense shade of 
the tropical forests. 
Every day we find that the birds are preventing the increase of 1 injuri- 


ous insects and small rodents as well as of harmful plant seeds. Take © 


any one day and consider the amount of food a bird consumes, particu- 
larly when they have broods of from four to nine, each little mouth 


taking in several ounces per day. This destruction of injurious mate- — 


2 . 


~ 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 87 


vial is not only going on through each day, but is continued through the 

night by the owls, nighthawks, and poor-wills. Swallows and swifts 

2 _. keep down the insect growth in air, while various species of flycatchers, 

warblers, vireos, and hummingbirds are busy in and about the foliage. 

- Woodpeckers, nuthatches, titmice, and gnatcatchers are always busy 
working over the limbs and tree-trunks, while innumerable varieties of 
thrushes and sparrows are continually at work on the ground seeking 
terrestrial insects as well as worms and seeds. 

Birds digest their food so rapidly that it is difficult to determine just 
how much they consume during a day’s feeding. Mr. E. H. Forbush, of 
the Board of Agriculture of Massachusetts, states that the stomachs of 
four small chickadees contained 1,028 eggs of the cankerworm; the 

stomachs of four others had about 600 eggs and 105 female moths of 
the cankerworm in them. It was estimated that one chickadee feeding 
for twenty-five days would destroy some 188,750 eggs of this noxious 
_ worm—a phenomenal amount for so small a bird. 
- Professor Forbes, Director of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural 
_ History, found in the stomach of a single robin, 175 bibis (a fly), 
4 which, in the larve stage, feeds on the roots of grass. From a few facts 
_of this nature we can see what an economi¢ factor the birds are, flitting 
about our farms and orchards by day and night. Hawks and owls 
especially, that are usually so condemned by the farmer and sportsmen 
in general, are constantly protecting the crops by killing off thousands 
of small rodents so destructive to grain and trees, and also by consum- 
ing millions of grasshoppers in the fall of the year. In fact, many 
species of hawks prey wholly on grasshoppers. 
Dr. A. K. Fisher, assistant of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 
found in the pellets cast up by a barn owl, that 200 contained 450 small 
mammals, no less than 225 of these being skulls of the field and 
_ meadow mice. Still we find that in many of our States a bounty: 
is offered for the heads of hawks and owls! The State of Pennsylvania 
sustained a loss of nearly $4,000,000 in eighteen months from the killing 
of over 100,000 of these birds. From my personal experience of one 

nesting site in an old sycamore limb, along the edge of my orchard, I 

took from a barn owl’s nest five pocket gophers, two wood rats, three 

small lizards, and two snakes. This was the food brought the young in 
one night! I have only found two species of hawks to be harmful about 
_ the habitations of man; of the owls, all are beneficial. 

As time rolls on and vast stretches of land come under cultivation, 
we shall see the need of giving more attention to the study and protec- 
tion of bird life, as the birds seek homes about our premises, to raise 
their broods and render a valuable service in keeping in check millions 
of noxious insect pests. It is stated as a fact by one of the leading 
- entomologists of the United States that insects alone cause an annual 


Pg 1 ee ee 
pin Lg | 


: 
en 


- 


88. OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


logs of at least $200,000,000 to ee agricultural interests of this cannes ae 


Thousands of the trees in our great city parks, as well as vast forests, — a 
are already affected by a species of scale, which cannot be checked with-.. “ 
out a great outlay of time and money, but which can be kept in check ae 


if we will give protection to our bird life by wise legislation. 


The amount of harmful seeds destroyed by birds throughout the year ze = 


runs into millions of pounds, as one of the U. S. Department of 


Agriculture ornithologists has figured out. One species of seed-eating a 


birds of the junco family consumes at the rate of one-fourth of an ounce iP 
per day, and they average ten juncos to each square mile of land. In 
200 days this species, in the State of Iowa alone, consumes 875 tons of 


noxious weed seed in a single season. Large as the i pe they — 


certainly fall far short of the reality. = a 
In treating of the economic value of birds, it we been iain toshow 
them as consuming insects only, whereas we here find them feeding on 
thousands of pounds of harmful weed seeds as well, which fact has not 
been fully known and appreciated. One of our many small sparrows — 
will fill his crop with 1,000 seeds of the pigweed for its breakfast, 
and as many as 7,500 seeds have been counted from a dove’s crop. 


Among many of the birds which feed on seeds are the towhees, song me | 


sparrows, lark finches, horned larks, grosbeaks, Gambel’s, golden- 
crowned and field sparrows, as well as seven varieties of goldfinches 
and others. 

I find 31 species noted feeding on seeds about my home. There are 
84 species that can be found through parts of the year that live entirely 
on insects. Among them are three forms of wrens, five warblers, two 
titmice, four vireos,and woodpeckers, juncos, kinglets, Audubon’s warbler, 


and two species of goldfinch. I have seen two species feeding on the 


apricot scale. The bush tit, warbling vireo, yellow warbler, and plain 
titmouse will hunt the pear and apple orchard over for larve of the 
codling moth. 

Of birds that have been proven harmful to the orchardists, may be 
mentioned more particularly the house finch, sometimes known as the 
red-headed linnet. They will eat the base of the prune and cherry 
blossoms for the sweet juice of the flower. (rambel’s and golden-crowned — 


sparrows are the worst pests for destroying fruit blossoms and young 


peas. The two sparrows named leave soon after the trees have blossomed _ 
and are only a winter resident with us. There is only one remedy for ~ 
them—powder and dust shot. . 

From the following subjoined notes from the laboratory work of © 


investigation of birds’ stomachs from the Department of Agriculture — 


will be seen the character of the foods of many of our common birds: 
In 330 stomachs of the robin, 42 per cent was animal matter; 19 per 
cent consisted of beetles; caterpillars, 6 per cent; grasshoppers, 30 per 


BeOS pith Tere Hk kk 
Loe ree Ss 


P 
Sem 
a; 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 89 


cent; vegetable matter, 7 per cent, besides wild fruits. The food of 


wrens is 98 per cent insectivorous the year round, only 2 per cent 
being vegetable. They feed on bugs, spiders, caterpillars, flies, and larve 


wherever found. 2 

All thrushes’ food consists of beetles, bugs, spiders, grasshoppers, 
caterpillars, earthworms, and a few seeds and wild fruits. Of the 
orioles’ food caterpillars constituted 34 per cent of that found in 173 
stomachs, other insects being bugs, beetles, ants, wasps, spiders, and 
grasshoppers, besides larvee and bark-lice. Of 238 stomachs of the 
meadowlark examined, animal food—that is, insects—constituted 73 
per cent; vegetable matter, 27 per cent, 14 per cent of which was hard 
weed seeds and grain. They consume cutworms by thousands, also 
wireworms and beetles. 

The bee martin, or kingbird, is a great feeder on insects. Out of 281 
stomachs collected from different parts of the country, only 14 honey 
bees were found, the majority being drones. The great bulk of food of 
this species is largely noxious species of beetles (the May and click 
varieties), wireworms, wasps, weevils, crickets, and grasshoppers. All 


_ the flycatchers, of which there are many species, are among the most 


beneficial of the birds frequenting orchards. 

Grosbeaks feed largely on vegetable matter, buds of forest trees, and. 
wild fruits. Of insects they consume corn-worms, beetles, caterpillars of 
all forms, and in Colorado they have been known to clean out the nox- 
ious potato beetles when nothing else would touch them, bringing their 
young to the patches to feed as soon as they could fly. 

Bluejays, we find, have a hard name, but from 292 stomachs exam- 
ined, animal matter comprised 24 per cent and vegetable matter 76 per 
cent of this bird’s diet. Only five stomachs had any remains of small 
birds, or egg shells. Besides this food the jay eats mice, salamanders, 
snails, beetles, grasshoppers, caterpillars, more than 19 per cent of 
their whole food consisting of harmful insects. In the fall months 
their food consists of from 64 to 83 per cent of acorns. 

While many of our birds are known to now and then eat of our 
fruits, if we carefully compare the benefits accruing from their work the 
balance will easily be in their favor. Why should we not give them 
some protection? Thousands are being killed every month by one 
means or another, and they threaten to soon become scarce about our 
homes and orchards. One instance I wish to give as showing the 
wholesale destruction of bird life for the San Francisco market, which 


is now going on: In a letter to Mr. Chester Barlow, Secretary of the 


Cooper Ornithological Club, from Mr. W. B. Sampson of Stockton, and | 
dated February 14, 1898, Mr. Sampson states that on the day before he ~ 
happened along a levee some distance from the city, where the brush is 


inhabited by thousands of small birds. He noticed that two Italians 


J ‘s a 5 


90 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE. 


had a fine mesh net fifty feet long stretched over the brush, as he © 
thought, for repair, but was surprised at seeing them begin to beat the 
brush with sticks a hundred yards beyond the end of the net, driving 
all the birds into it. They were snaring them, as they said, for the — 
markets. Mr. Sampson saw them take out 50 birds and they had some 
300 caught as the result of a day’s work. They were questioned, and 
admitted having practiced snaring for some time, and had captured as 
many as 2,000 birds in a day and sent them to the San Francisco — 
market as “‘reed-birds.”” No doubt there are many more practicing 
this destruction in other parts of California, and if it is kept up the 
results can be foreseen. It will result in an increase of pests on our 
farms and consequent damage to the fruit-growing industry. Many 
States have enacted strict and most commendable laws to protect the 
native birds from such wanton slaughter. Why shall not California do 
the same? It is a question vitally important to the fruit-grower of the — 
future. 


SUBSTITUTES FOR PARIS GREEN. - 
Essay By PROF. C. W. WOODWORTH, or BERKELEY. 


Paris green is practically the only substance that has been widely 
and extensively used as a remedy for the codling moth. During the 
last three or four years a great deal of complaint has been made, both 
here and in the Eastern States, because of the failure to obtain the 
same good results as formerly, even by orchardists who do very careful 
work and have previously had the best results. During this same 
period there has been a decided change in the microscopic appearance 
of most of the Paris green on the market, indicating a large amount of 
adulteration on the one hand and a different and less satisfactory method 
of manufacture on the other. The situation became so thoroughly unen- 
durable that the Agricultural Experiment Station, after obtaining the 
opinion of many of the entomologists of the various experiment sta- 
tions, editors of a number of agricultural journals, and other interested 
parties, has decided not to recommend the coming year the use of Paris 
green at all as an insecticide. 


Forms of Impurities.—Three distinct classes of unsatisfactory Paris — 
green can be recognized, which we would designate respectively, as — 
bogus, adulterated, and low-grade Paris green. 

Bogus Paris Green.— Under this title is included that series of out- 
and-out imitations of Paris green in which the color is produced from 
other substances than copper, and which usually contain no trace 
either of copper or of arsenic. They are usually perfectly harmless to — 
the plant and to the insect, and quite decidedly cheaper than Paris — 


a 
zy 
° 


_ TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 91 


green. They are sold mostly by paint-dealers, and were probably 


- manufactured for use as a cheaper form of green pigment than is Paris 


green. 

Adulterated Paris Green.—This class of Paris green is often sold by 
unscrupulous dealers—sometimes by honest dealers who have been 
supplied by unscrupulous jobbers—and indicates always an intention 
of fraud on the part of some one. It consists of Paris green in part, 
generally upward of fifty per cent, and to this is added some other 
substance for the purpose of increasing the weight. Any white powder, 
such as gypsum, will do,.and even flour has been used. The intensity 
of the green color in good Paris green allows considerable addition of 
white material, though, in some cases, green or blue pigments are added 
to prevent detection. Most of these forms of cheapening Paris green 
are at once recognized by either the “ammonia” or the “glass” test, 
and especially are they at once detected under the microscope. 

Low-Grade Paris Green.—The third type of unsatisfactory Paris green, 
and the one most difficult to recognize, is a “low-grade Paris green”; by 
which term it is intended to designate those manufactured in such a 
way as to contain a low per cent of arsenious oxid in combination. A 
strictly pure Paris green can be produced, according to our observa- 
tions, with not over forty per cent of arsenious oxid, but such a sample 
is simply low-grade. To use such in spraying would require nearly 
one half more material to produce effective spraying than would be 
necessary with a sample containing the normal fifty-eight per cent of 


“arsenious oxid. For this class of green it appears that the only test 


now available is the chemical determination of the quantity of arsenic 
present. 

The production of low-grade Paris green is almost as expensive, or 
perhaps quite as expensive, so far as the ingredients used are concerned, 
as is the production of the high-grade article. 

It therefore appears that the low-grade greens are produced not with 
any intention of defrauding the public, but rather because of the ease 
of manufacture. The laws, especially of New York, where the greatest 
amount of Paris green is manufactured, require the total arsenious oxid 
to be above fifty per cent, and this has required the addition, either 
during or after manufacture, of sufficient arsenious oxid in the free 


- state to come within the requirements of the law. As a result of this 


the greater part of the low-grade Paris green on the market contains as 
an adulterant a considerable proportion of the free acid. The deter- 
minations that have been heretofore made have only taken into 
consideration the total arsenic per cent, and so all these samples of 
low-grade, ‘‘doctored” Paris green have been passed as pure. 


wae 

Se ee 
a FS 

t i 


92 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


Danger from Arsenical Adulterations.—White arsenic (arsenious a 


oxid), as has long been known, is very injurious to foliage; for this 


reason, it is scarcely at all used for the destruction of insects. It is_ 


much cheaper than Paris green, and were it not for the injury to foliage Z = 
would have been used entirely instead of Paris green. The one thing 
which has made the latter the standard insecticide has been its 


insolubility. Of late years, since the addition of free white arsenic has 
become a common practice by the manufacturers, or by adulterators, — 
the unreliability of Paris green in its influence on foliage has been 
repeatedly noticed. In the hands of the farmer this is almost sure to 


ae 


result in a diminution of the dose until the injury becomes unimportant. —_ 
On the farm it is the practice to weigh and measure things very care- — 
lessly, and the difference between full measure and scant measure, even ~— 


when the farmer thinks he is following directions, amounts to a very — 
great deal. The diminution of dose has been one of the causes, and an ~ 


important one, of the complaints of the ineffectiveness of Paris green, 
which we have heard from all over the United States during the last 
few years. 


The danger to foliage from free arsenic has also resulted in the cine 


of the formula now usually recommended, by attempting to neutralize 


the soluble substances in the Paris green by the addition of lime. This 


matter will be referred to again below and in more detail. The addition 
of lime has been more or less successful when the amount of arsenic was 
not too large, but one of the great advantages of Paris green—that 
which more than anything else has caused it to hold its own as an 


insecticide—is the fact that no preparation is necessary. The substance — 


as it is purchased from the store is stirred up in water and 1s at once 
ready for use. If it is necessary to add some material to neutralize ‘the 
free arsenious oxid, it will be better to take slightly more trouble and 
decrease the cost of the material by the use of home-made arsenites. 


Cause of Injury to Foliage.—While Paris green is entirely insoluble 
in pure water, it appears that as ordinarily used a certain amount of it 
does find its way into solution and thus enters the plant; and if very 
much goes in, the death of the part of the plant thus poisoned ensues. 


The most critical period seems to be the time during which the spray 
remains wet upon the leaf, and each subsequent wetting of the leaf 


from any cause, such as a fog or dew, continues the danger. It has been 
demonstrated repeatedly that dry Paris green can be placed upon a leaf 
in any quantity, and so long as the leaf remains dry no evil results will] 


follow. After an application in the wet way, almost immediately, within 
twenty-four hours, a blackening of the leaf or of parts of the leaf may ~ 


occur, or the leaf may entirely escape at that time, but later, after a — 


dew or fog, show the signs of the action of the poison; or again, there 


jet 
<2 


a ol Soe 
ete 
ay ve es 

ss Pret 


eS TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 93 


may be no blackening of the leaf observed at any time, but the leaf may 


_. become prematurely yellow and drop off within two or three weeks from 
the time the application was made; showing that the poison which 
entered the plant, though not enough to kill it at once, deranged its 
_functions to such an extent as to cause this premature dropping. 


These two forms of poisoning we have designated as the acute and the 
chronic poisoning of arsenic. | 

The amount of poisoning that may occur, other things being equal, 
seems to be entirely dependént upon the amount of soluble arsenic in 
the spraying mixture, though there are conditions of the plant when it 
is possible to spray even with a solution of arsenic and produce no evil 
effects. We know that under certain conditions leaves will absorb 
water, and under other conditions not at all; so it may be supposed 
in cases where solutions of arsenic have been applied without injury, 
that the plant was in such a condition that no absorption of water took 
place and none of the arsenic solution entered the plant; and that 
before the leaves became again absorbent the water had evaporated, 
leaving the arsenic upon the leaves ina dry form. This might flake 
off and blow away from the leaves before they are exposed to a dew or 
fog. It may be that when we know more about the effect of weather 
upon the leaves, we will be able to spray at times when the leaf is least 
susceptible to-injury, and so lessen the danger to the plant. 


Prevention of Injury.—A chemical means of avoiding the injury of 
Paris green has been used considerably. It consists in adding a large 
amount of lime to the water in which the Paris green is mixed, and this 


_ appears to be sufficient to render insoluble any slight amount of free 


arsenic or other soluble arsenites that may be present. The use of lime 
with Paris green has now come to be recognized as a very important 


precautionary measure in preparing this spraying material, chiefly 
_ because of the presence of white arsenic in the Paris green that has 


been manufactured of late years. The amount commonly recommended 
varies from one to ten parts of lime to each part of Paris green. If the 
amount of free arsenic in the sample is not too high, good effects will 


result from adding the lime; but beyond a certain point the lime does 


no good, and may even do harm. It has long been known that lime 
acts on white arsenic, when the latter is in suspension in water, in such 
a way as to render it much more injurious to foliage than the arsenic 
would have been without the lime. 


Laws Concerning Paris Green.—A number of the States, including 
New York, Louisiana, Texas, and Oregon, have enacted laws requiring 
the Paris green sold on the market in those States to contain fifty per 
cent of arseniousoxid. These laws differ somewhat in detail in the differ- 
ent States, but agree in establishing this standard for purity. Appar- 


~ 


94 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE aie 


ently, the only requirements of the laws in any of these States is that 


the substance sold as Paris green shall contain at. least this minimum 


amount of arsenious oxid. Since arsenic is the cheaper ingredient in 
‘Paris green, it is evident that this law could be taken advantage of by — 
the manufacturers or dealers and an inferior article placed on the_ 
market, containing any combination of material so long as it is green 
and contains sufficient of this comparatively cheap substance. 

There is nothing in the laws, nor has there been any attempt by the 


chemists in charge of the analyses made under the laws, to distinguish ~ 


the amount of uncombined, or soluble, arsenious oxid in the substances 


sold as Paris green. Such laws may be satisfactory to manufacturers — 


or dealers, but certainly leave very much to be desired from the stand- 
point of fruit-growers or agriculturists in whose benefit they are sup- 
posed to have been enacted; they show evidence of the failure to 
appreciate the real situation by those who frame the laws. In most of 
these States the laws are well provided with means to secure their 
enforcement, so that by remedying the defect pointed out above, by the 
establishment of a truer standard of purity, the markets would again 
be filled with a satisfactory Paris green. Manufacturers are not so 
blind to their own interests as to fail to meet any clearly defined 
demand. They stand anxious and ready to meet any reasonable 
requirement the fruit-grower may make. 


Substitutes for Paris Green. — 4 good sample of Paris green is a 
satisfactory article for killing codling moth, and it has been tested so 
long under all sorts of conditions, and proven itself thoroughly satis- 
factory; and moreover, as it can be had everywhere, and requires no 
preparation, it is altogether an extremely satisfactory remedy to use. 
The unreliability of the substance, however, is such that unless one is 


= 


assured of the quality of the sample he intends to use, the only safe 


procedure is to use one of the substitutes hereinafter described. Not 


only the unreliability, but also the cost of Paris green, has caused many « ~ 


to look for a substitute. This search has been sufficiently successful to — 


incline many to the opinion that Paris green never can again take the 
almost exclusive place it formerly held among this class of insecti- 
cides. A number of compounds have been suggested and more or less 
thoroughly tried for this purpose, and the results obtained in some 
cases have been very highly satisfactory. There are quite a number of 
substances of this character already on the market, and some can be 
very easily and cheaply manufactured at home. 


/ 


Home-Made Compounds.—The cheapest arsenical compounds are 


certainly home-made mixtures. The method of manufacture of these 


substances is very simple, and there seems to be no ‘Teason why they 
might not be used almost exclusively. 


” 


- 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 95 


Arsenate of Lead has not been tried, except in a very limited way, for 
the codling moth, but the highly satisfactory results obtained upon other 
insects and the perfect safety to foliage would indicate that it might be 


- extremely profitable to experiment with. There are two methods of 


making arsenate of lead, which produce substances somewhat different in 
chemical structure, but about equally effective. In each method sixty- 


eight per cent of arsenate of soda is used, and with this, in one case, 
the ordinary white granular acetate of lead, and in the other, lead 


nitrate. The process of manufacture is as follows: The lead salt and 
arsenate of soda are dissolved separately, and then poured into the 
tank containing the water for spraying. The proportions used are 
about as follows: For every ten ounces of arsenate of soda take twenty- 


four ounces of lead acetate or twenty ounces of lead nitrate. These 


substances can be purchased in the right proportions and tied up in 
bags, so that it will take one bagful of each for each tank of water. 

The amounts given above are sufficient to make about a pound of the 
pure arsenate of lead, which would probably be enough for one hundred 


- and fifty or two hundred gallons of water. It can be used with perfect 


safety several times as strong as this. As a precautionary measure, it 


might be well to‘test the mixture in order to be sure that the arsenic is 


all in combination, which can be done by the use of potassium bi- 
chromate, which will produce a yellow precipitate if the solution 
contains lead in excess, as it should. 

_ Arsenic and Lime.—Very satisfactory directions for making this 
mixture are given in a letter from Professor Taft, of Michigan, one of 
the first who extensively experimented with it. He writes: “I have 
had excellent results from boiling one pound of (white) arsenic and:-two 
pounds of lime in two gallons of water for forty minutes and then 
diluting as required. When one pound of the arsenic prepared as 


above is used in every three hundred to four hundred gallons of water, 


I have found it equal to Paris green for destroying codling moth and 
curculio, while one pound answers for one hundred and fifty to two 
hundred gallons of water when it is used upon potatoes; unless used in 
Bordeaux mixture, I find it best to add «a small amount of lime when 
diluting. As the wholesale price of arsenic has averaged about seven 


cents per pound for a number of years, while Paris green has whole- 


saled at eighteen cents, it is evident that the latter is fully five times as 


expensive.” In reference to the comparative value of arsenic with soda 


and lime, he further writes: “‘ While some recommend the use of sal-. 
soda to dissolve the arsenic, we have not found it necessary; and as the 
use cf soda at the rate commonly recommended nearly doubles the 
expense of the spraying mixture, we have not recommended it, although 


the claim that when sal-soda is used it is possible to tell when the 


arsenic is dissolved, is correct.” The only trouble with this mixture 


4 


96 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


seems to be the danger of an incomplete union between the lime aad thee 


arsenic, so that the full forty minutes’ boiling, possibly even with more = . 
lime and the addition of lime when cae would probably render 


the mixture entirely safe.” 


Arsenic, Soda, and I1me.—This is often known as the Kedzie formula, eS 


as it seems first to have been recommended by Professor Kedzie, of 
Michigan. The method of its production is fully described in the fol- 


RSet letter from Professor Kedzie: 


AGRICULTURAL CoLLzcE, MICHIGAN, September 5, 1899. 

The formula I recommended for an arsenical spraying mixture to take the place of 
Paris green was the following: Boil two pounds of white arsenic with eight pounds of 
sal-soda in two gallons of rain water. Boil these materials together in any iron pot not 
used for other purposes; boil them fifteen minutes, or until the arsenic dissolves, leay- 
_ ing only a small muddy sediment. Put the solution in a two-gallon jug and label © 
Poison, Stock Material for spraying mixture. The spraying mixture can be prepared 
whenever required in the quantity needed at the time, by slacking two pounds of lime, 
and adding this to forty gallons of water; pour into this a pint of the stock arsenic 


solution; mix up, stirring thoroughly, and fhe spraying mixture is ready for use. The ~ 


arsenic in this mixture is equivalent to four ounces of Paris green. 

ADVANTAGES OF THIS METHOD: First—It is very cheap and the materials can Sie 
found in every village in the State; 

Second—The stock material (arsenite of soda) is easily prepared and can be kept in 
that form for any length of time, ready for making a spraying mixture of lime and 
water ; 

fi hird—The arsenite of lime in the quantity required for spraying will not burn the 
- leaves, or injure the trees or plants; ~ 


Fourth—It will be uniform in quality and not vary in gy ee as Paris green. often = 


does; 
Fifth—it acu a milky colored spray and the color on the trees will show how 


evenly it is distributed. 
Every one using such deadly poison should bear in mind the possible danger from — 
its use; the pot, the jug, and every apparatus for making the arsenite of soda should 


be ed for no other purpose of any kind. 
Very faithfully, . 
(Signed:) R. C. KEDZIE. 


- Mr. Smith, of Hood River, Oregon, varies this formula, reeommend- 
ing: ‘‘Instead of two pounds of lime I used not less than six pounds; 
and I found that the additional lime prevented burning foliage and 
also retained the poison longer on the trees. I also used one quart 
instead of one and a half pints of the arsenic to fifty gallons of water.” 
And again, “I would recommend using freely of the lime up to say ten 
pounds to fifty gallons of water.” 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 97 


NATIONAL HORTICULTURAL QUARANTINE. 


_ The Committee on Legislation presented a report recommending the 
adoption of the following bill on national horticultural quarantine: 


AN ACT 


To PROVIDE FOR THE INSPECTION AND TREATMENT OF TREES, PLANTS, Buns, Curries, 
GRAFTS, Crons, NURSERY STOCK, AND FRuit IMpoRtED INTO THE UNITED Srarzs. 


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America 
aim Congress assembled: 


Section 1. That the Secretary of Agriculture be, and he is hereby, authorized, at the 
expense of the owner or owners, to place and retain in quarantine all trees, plants, 
buds, cuttings, grafts, clons, nursery stock, and fruit imported into the United States, 
at such ports as he may designate for such purposes, and under such conditions as he 
may, by regulation, prescribe, and that he may appoint inspectors for the purpose of 
examining such trees, plants, buds, cuttings, grafts, cions, nursery stock, and fruit for 
the purpose of ascertaining whether they are affected by any injurious insect or disease, 
the importation of which will be prejudicial to the horticultural interests of the United 
States, and provide for the treatment of such when found necessary. 

Sxec. 2. That when such trees, plants, buds, cuttings, grafts, cions, nursery stock, or 
fruit shall be determined to be infested with any injurious insect or disease, they shall 
be treated at the expense of the owner or owners in accordance with the regulations of 
the Secretary of Agriculture, or they shall be destroyed in case their condition is such 
as to warrant such destruction. But an appeal may be taken from the decision of the 
inspector to the Secretary of Agriculture, if such appeal be taken within three days 
after such inspection, and the decision of the Secretary of Agriculture shall be final. 

Szc. 3. That when such inspection shall show that such trees, plants, buds, cuttings, 
grafts, cions, nursery stock, or fruit are apparently free from injurious insects or 
diseases, a certificate to ‘this effect, made in accordance with the regulations of the Sec- 
retary of Agriculture, shall be issued to the owner or owners thereof by the said 
inspector, and this certificate shall operate to release all the objects above specified, 
when duly stamped or labeled with the same, from further quarantine or restriction at 
the said port of entry. Any person who shall forge, counterfeit, or knowingly alter, de- 
face, or destroy any of the marks, stamps, or certificates provided for in the regulations 
of the Secretary of Agriculture on any such trees, plants, buds, cuttings, grafts, cions, 
_ nursery stock, or fruit, or who shall forge, counterfeit, or knowingly or wrongfully 
alter, deface, or destroy any certificate as provided for in said regulations, shall. be 
punished by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars or imprisonment not to exceed 
one year, or both, at the discretion of the court. 

Szc.4. That whenever it shall appear to the Secretary of Agriculture that any foreign 
country shall have provided proper and competent inspection and treatment, in accord- 
ance with the provisions of this Act, for the objects above specified as being subject to 
inspection and treatment, he may, by proclamation or otherwise, accept such inspection 
and treatment in lieu of inspection performed by officers appointed by himself, which 
aeceptation or proclamation by the Secretary of Agriculture shall relieve all such arti- 
eles specified in the foregoing sections of this Act, when properly stamped or labeled, 
from further quarantine or restriction, except such as may be provided by the laws of 
the State or Territory to which they are sent within the United States. 

Src. 5. That whenever it shall appear to the Secretary of A griculture that any variety 
of fruit grown outside of the United States or District of Columbia, is being, or is about 
to be, imported into the United States or District of Columbia, and such variety of fruit 
is infested by any injurious insect or disease, which insect or disease is liable to become 
established in the United States and injuriously affect any variety of fruit grown therein, 
he shall have authority to quarantine against any such variety of fruit, and prevent the 
importation of the same until such time as it may appear to him that such insect or 


7—BH 


98 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


disease has become exterminated in the country where such fruit is grown, when ies 
may withdraw the quarantine, and this shall operate to relieve all such fruit from further — 
restrictions as long as the conditions of freedom from injurious insects or diseases shall 
continue. ees 

Sec. 6. That the sum of fifty thousand dollars, or so much thereof as may be neces: x 
sary, is hereby appropriated out of any moneys in the treasury of the United States not 
otherwise appropriated, to carry into effect the provisions of this Act. = 

Src. 7. This Act shall take effect on and after the first day of July, nineteen hundred, ; 


Upon motion, the bill was adopted, and the Secretary of the Conven- 
tion requested to forward copies to our Senator and Representatives at ks 
Washington for introduction in Congress. wie o 


NICARAGUA CANAL. ae 


Jupc—e AIKEN. The Committee on Resolutions beg leave to report — 
that they have carefully considered the resolution on the Nicaragua 
Canal, introduced by Mr. Edward Berwick, and recommend its adop- 
tion by the convention, as follows: — 5, 


— 


WuHereas, Half a century has already paed devoted to a succession of surveys by 
various commissions without any decisive steps being taken towards actual construc- 
tion; and : ee 

WHEREAS, The Nicaragua Canal Commission headed by Admiral Walker has x2 
reported favorably as to the entire feasibility of such construction at a reasonable 
outlay; and Se ee 

WueErzeas, The prosperity of the whole agricultural and horticultural interests ofthe  _ 
Pacific Coast, involving many millions of dollars annually, depends in the future on 
improved transportation facilities; therefore, be it 

Resolved, That this convention of the fruit-growers of California most urgently 
petitions the Congress of the United States to proceed at once to enact such legislation —__ 
as will enable the Government of the United States to proceed to the immediate con- a 
struction of the Nicaragua Canal upon the basis of the Walker Commission. 


Resolution adopted. 


REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION. 


R. D. StepHENS, chairman of the Committee on Transportation, 
submitted the following report: 


Your Committee on Transportation and Marketing beg leave to make the following 
report: 

Wuereas, The railroads entering California and engaged in transporting fruit 
therefrom have made traffic arrangements and agreements under which special 
privileges and benefits accrue to certain shippers that are denied to others; and aes 

Wuereas, Under the agreements above referred to shippers of green a citrus fruits x? 
from California are forced to make their shipments in cars controlled by private 
individuals or corporations, under which arrangement exorbitant and extortionate i 
tribute must be paid by the fruit-growers to private parties or corporations,and by __ 
which arrangements the green fruit shipments from California are practically forced — 
into the hands of two shipping firms, thus giving to them privileges that are a 
to others and by which all competition is in effect cut off; and SE tr 

Wuereas, Under the arrangements and agreements Shore referred to, favored ship- Fie 
pers, by reason of carline benefits accruing to them both on their own shipments and ~ BS 


: 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 99 


~ 


' on others forced into cars operated for their benefit, are able to manipulate markets to 
the detriment of other shippers and growers; and - 
Wuereas, All the above unjust discriminations and the consequent disastrous © 

results to the fruit-growers of California have been effected by the railroad companies 

over the constant protests and pleadings of the fruit-growers; and 

"e WuHeErEAS, We believe the agreements under which all of this hardship and damage 

- has resulted both unjust and unlawful; therefore, be it 

eS Resolved, That this convention voice the protest of the fruit-growers of California 
against the grossly unjust and discriminating policy inaugurated and forced upon us 
by the transportation companies ; 

Resolved, further, That this convention, representing all classes of fruit-growers, 

hereby extends sympathy and every aid in its power to the growers of green and citrus 

= fruits who are the direct sufferers under the wrongful policy above referred to, and we 

2 believe that the wronged growers should pursue vigorously every lawful means within 

their power to compel the correction of the evil, and we pledge our earnest supports in 
every such effort; 

Resolved, That we disapprove and denounce as unjust and iniquitous the existing 
private carline system to which our shipments are farmed out by the railroad companies 
and to which shippers are compelled to pay tribute,and we urge the railroad com- 
panies to provide suitable equipment, or permit the fruit-growers to do so, for all fruit 

shipments free from the domination of any individual or private corporation and 
available to all shippers on equal terms. 


On motion, the above report was referred to the Committee on 
Legislation. 


COMMITTEE ON ORGANIZATION. 


The President announced the appointment of the following committee 
of ten (later increased to twenty-one) to call a convention of fruit- 
growers to meet at San José in January, 1900, for the purpose of effecting 
a more complete organization by conferring with the prune-growers of 
the State: 

S. R. Jonnson, San José. H. W. MEEK, San Lorenzo. 
W. P. Crain, San José. C. W. Curxps, San José. 
S. P. Sanpers, San José. _ A. Moncurg, Palermo. 
F. M. GrimsHAw, Sacramento. B. E. Hutcurnson, Fowler. 
B 
A 


J.B. DE JARNETT, Colusa. . F. Warton, Yuba City. 
JoHN MARKLEY, Sonoma. LFRED Barstow, San José. 


TuHos. A. JAcoss, Visalia. G. E. Lawrence, Lodi. 

A. B. Fuetcuer, San José. H. L. STEVENS, Sau José. 
+H. L. Gress, Stockton. L. F. Grawam, San José. 

A.R. SpracueE, Los Angeles. —— ——, Kings County. 


CHARLES BARNES, Suisun. 


At this time a recess was taken until 7:30 o’clock this evening. 


fateh 
t 


100 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


THIRD DAY—EVENING SESSION. 


THURSDAY, December 14, 1899. 


At 7:30 o’clock p. m. the convention reassembled. President -CooPER 


in the chair. 


FRUIT TREE STOCKS. 


Essay By LEONARD COATES, or Napa. 


The fine appearance of most orchards in California is due as much to 


natural conditions as to the skill of the nurseryman or the care of the 


orchardist. When soil and climate are perfect, he is an egotist indeed 
who takes to himself the credit for unusually vigorous growth or abnor- 
mal bearing qualities. Let these conditions be adverse and the results 
would be far different. : 


I would mean by this that neither the nurseryman nor the orchardist 


is as careful as he would have to be elsewhere to produce a fine orchard, 
and in nothing is the former more careless than in the selection of suit- 
able stocks, or roots, on which to graft or bud his trees. 

The causes which led up to this state of things are various. Low 
prices for trees always follow correspondingly low prices for fruit, and 


vice versa. A large demand for trees in a few years begets an oversupply 


of the commodity, and a slump in prices. - Oregon has shipped millions 
of trees into this State and at prices which could permit of no profit 
tothe grower. The farmer, who thinks the nurseryman is making money 
too fast, plants a lot of peach seed and buds the trees during the summer. 
He makes nothing himself and prevents those who follow the business 
from selling at a profit. | 

The planting public may be benefited by these low prices, temporarily; 
but, as in all other lines of business, cheap trees may be the dearest in 
the end. | ; 

Unless more care is given to the selection of fruit tree stocks a 
vigorous and prolific orchard will be the exception rather than the rule. 
Twenty years ago several nurserymen raised seedlings for their own use 
and for sale. The cheap imported French stock put a stop to that, and 
now California is entirely dependent upon other States or countries for 
pear, apple, cherry, and plum stocks. This ought not to be, and I believe 
the time will soon come when a nurseryman who will grow and select 
his own stocks and so advertise, will readily obtain fifty per cent more 
for his trees than for others which cannot be so guaranteed. 


It is accepted by all progressive horticulturists that the stockexertsa  __ 
certain influence on the graft or bud inserted into it. This may be to- 4 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 101 


dwarf the tree, to give it added vigor, or to adapt it to the soil or climate. 
In like manner, disease, particularly that which is inherent or hereditary, 
will be communicated between stock and graft; hence, the importance of 


grafts or buds from healthy trees worked only upon healthy stocks. 


Millions of seedlings which are being used as stocks for fruit trees are 
not healthy, and it is only the exceptionally favorable conditions which 
exist in California that prevent, in a measure, the more noticeable effects 
in our orchards. As the land becomes weakened by continual cropping, 


_ the effects of poor stocks will soon be seen. The reasons are, mainly, 


the demand for cheap trees and the fact that many California nursery- 
men are so called because they have rented some land and planted a 
certain acreage of seedlings for budding; they have had no previous 


training or experience, and, at the turn of the wheel, they are just as 


likely to boom some oil stock, plant sugar beets, or marry a rich widow. 
In other words, they are neither nurserymen nor horticulturists, and. 
never will be. 

To grow apple seedlings that are healthy and free from aphis it is 
essential, in the first place, that the seed be good and plump and not 
taken indiscriminately from any and all varieties. Seed from the crab- 
apple is by some considered the best. In the second place, new land 
must be used, away from old orchards, and open to the full sweep of the 
wind; a rich river bottomis generally the best. And in the third place, 
the seedlings must be kept growing very vigorously until fall, by thor- 
ough cultivation and frequent irrigation. For small plantings the seed 
may be sown in boxes and the plants transplanted when several inches . 
high. 

The late John Lewelling claimed that seed from Rawle’s Janet aa 
Golden Russet produced roots which were free from the woolly aphis, 
and I have growing in my experimental grounds named seedling apples 
from New Zealand which are said not only to be aphis proof, but to 
bear fruit of exceptional quality. : 

It has been the practice for many years in Australia and New 
Zealand and, to a lesser extent in this country, to grow apples on 
Northern Spy stocks, which are aphis proof. Some other varieties, 
such as Winter Majetin, are also used. The method is to graft cions of 
the Northern Spy on to small pieces of apple roots, and plant them in 
the ordinary way. Roots will grow from the graft, and the next fall 
the plants are taken up, the apple roots cut off, and we then have a 
strong Northern Spy apple on its own roots. These are planted out, 
either in the orchard or in the nursery, and grafted with the variety it 
is desired to propagate. 

For dwarfing the apple the Baedice stock is used. This is a 
European wild apple, and is propagated by layering; it is quite liable 
to the attack of the aphis, and ashes should be used freely when trees 


102 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE | 


are planted, and afterwards for several years. Apple trees on nthe stock 2 " 


bear at three years old and continue this prolific habit. The fruit is as’ 


large and fine as that on standard trees, and the tree has many advan- owe 


tages in being of small size, such as saving labor at picking and prun- 


ing time, and in spraying for codling moth. Dwarf apple trees are — 


planted quite close, not more than ten or twelve feet apart. 


Much that has been said of the apple applies to the pear, except that 


the need of care is intensified by reason of the aphis in this case being 

fatal to the tree. French pear seedlings have been badly infested with _ 3 
aphis for years, and their importation should be stopped. Seeds of the é 
Seckel pear produce fine seedlings, and such varieties should be grown: 


for that purpose, the pear itself being dried and the seed saved. Seed- 


lings of Japanese pears have been used for some years; they possess aa 


great vigor, but their adaptability as stocks has not yet been fully 


demonstrated. They have been used mostly in the Southern and g 


Southwestern States. Pears of this class, such as Kieffer, Le Conte, eee 


Mikado, etc., root readily from cuttings, and such are used for stocks. 
It is not to be recommended, however, that cuttings be used for stocks in 
any case where a good seedling can be had. 
Cherry seedlings are mostly imported, and while nurserymen used to 
raise their own stocks from trees of Mahaleb and Mazzard, these have 


long since been grafted over and the French stock used. So far the — 
only pest coming with them has been an aphis which appears on the © 


leaves soon after the plants begin to grow. The Mazzard stock is most 
in favor and is undoubtedly the best in deep soils. Where the land has 


a clay subsoil and is shallower, the Mahaleb is better adapted, and this | 


stock seems to have stood the drought of the last two seasons better 


than the Mazzard. If this is generally so, then it is the more valuable “3 


stock. 


The peach is budded almost entirely upon peach seedlings, and but — 


little need be said here, except that seedling or natural pits are the 
best to use. I have used the peach-almond, but there are few of these 


trees left in the State. Stocks from this seed were of unusual vigor. Ag 


Hardshell almonds are used by some and are well adapted to dry, bel 
, soils. 


The apricot is budded also on the peach, and on its own seedling, the — 


former being generally preferable. 


The best stock for plums is more of a debatable question. Theoreti-: at 


cally a fruit is better worked on a seedling of its own kind, but it is © 


certain that some of these fruits succeed better on the peach. Seed- 


lings of the Green Gage plum make good stocks, but these were scarce, ~ 
so any European or Domestica plum seed was used in the early horti- — 


cultural days of California. The Myrobolan stock was introduced — 


some twenty or more years ago, the St. Julien and Mirabelle being also ae 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 103 


imported. The former was found more generally adaptive: it did not 


sucker, and it was cheaper; it also could be grown from cuttings. Thus 
the Myrobolan became the one plum stock for California, and it has 
been used almost exclusively. Many varieties of plum outgrow it, 
which is an objection, and it dwarfs a tree to some degree. This fault 


is largely overcome, owing to the favorable conditions before alluded 


to. Trees on Myrobolan are more liable to become bark-bound and, 
possibly by reason of the sap starting early, trees in a wet spring are, 
on Myrobolan, more liable to die because of “sour sap.” Further, 
Myrobolan seedlings as they come to us from France vary more than 
any other. In growth, in color, in form they differ widely. The wood 


of some is pale yellow, and from that, in every shade, to deep purple. 


Some grow upright, some spreading, and some actually of weeping 
habit. To use such stock one cannot have a continuously uniform 
orchard. Those only should be used which are of vigorous, upright 
growth, but the public demand is for cheap trees, and the demand 
must be supplied. Professor Bailey, of Cornell, has traced the history 
of the Myrobolan.- It is very interesting and goes back as far as 1601. 
Time will not permit of more than reference to it. Those who wish 
can read it in os 38 of the Cornell DE vaey Experiment 


‘Station. 


‘Of late years, owing to a growing disfavor in behalf of the ligrabale 


cuttings of Marianna have been largely used as stocks for plums. This 


is believed to belong to the same species as the Myrobolan, but possibly 


a hybrid between it and Wild Goose. After experimenting with it, 


however, I find no advantage over Myrobolan, and a serious drawback 
as with all cuttings—an imperfect root system. It is not grown exten- 
sively enough to get seed, and such would be much the same as Myro- 


. bolan. 


Cuttings from Prunus triflora, the species which is generally known 
as Japanese plums, but which originally came from China, root with 
ease, and some variety may be found which will make a good stock. 

Luther Burbank believes “that a hybrid plum with Japan blood 
will be the universal stock for stone fruit, such as peaches, almonds, 
plums, etc.” He is making some tests in this line. 

Mr. J. W. Kerr, of Maryland, who catalogues nearly four hundred 


_varieties of American plums, and who is recognized as an authority by 


such men as Professor Bailey, Professor Waugh, and others, writes me 
that he much prefers good seedlings of Myrobolan to cuttings of 


Marianna. He says that seedlings of the Wayland group of plums 


make good stocks, and do not sucker, -but after all his experience he 


comes to the conclusion that ‘‘for good, sound orchard trees, my experi- 


ence begets a decided preference for trees root-grafted on peach.” 
| -Of course there are some varieties of plum that do not make a good 


104 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


union with the peach, but all of the Japanese plums, French prune, 
Imperiale prune, Burbank’s Sugar prune, and most other plums succeed 


on peach. A root-graft makes a cleaner, straighter tree than a budded — | 
tree, and roots will. grow from the point of union, thus giving some of — 
both plum and peach. My own experience here coincides with that of 


Mr. Kerr, and I would unhesitatingly recommend the peach stock for 
plums or prunes on any good fruit land. | 


What is known as “double-working” is a plan hy which a tree may ~ 


be made more adaptive to the various conditions. For instance, such a 


variety as the Italian prune (known here as Fellenberg) is grafted or : 


budded on peach stock and subsequently again grafted some two or 
_ three feet from the ground with any other variety of plum. Thus we 
haye an exceptionally hardy and vigorous trunk to our future tree, one 
that is less liable to sun-scald, to be bark-bound, or to any other ail- 
ment. Further, this enables us to grow such varieties as Robe de 
Sergent, Yellow Egg, etc., on a peach root, on which they could not be 
directly worked, owing to non-adaptability of stock and cion. 

The planter should always visit the nursery from which he expects 
to get his trees during the growing season. He should learn what he 
can about stocks; in short, use his intelligence in this as in other 
business matters. ; 

The nurseryman should only grow what it is for the best interests of 
the orchardist to plant, and he should be encouraged to do so by closer 


mutual acquaintance and a willingness on the part of the planter to pay 


a fair price for a good article. 


RESISTANT VINE STOCKS. 


Essay By E. D. SWEETSER, or Santa Rosa. 


My purpose in this essay is to champion a native California stock 
which I honestly believe will repay a thorough investigation on the 
part of the majority of the wine-growers of this State. 


In the fall of 1868, the deadly phylloxera was probably at work in — 


the old Appleton vinewend near Agua Caliente, in Sonoma County. 
According to a well-informed pioneer of 1850, the pest was certainly 


multiplying in the fair vineyards of Sonoma Valley for twenty years 


prior to the destructive period between 1885 and 1893. 

The Spanish missionaries found that valley especially adapted to the 
grape and drank wine from their own vines before the Bear Flag was 
raised at Sonoma fifty years ago. More grapes were raised in the region 


drained by Sonoma Creek,during the sixties than in all the rest of the 
county. As late as 1885, Messrs. Atilla, Haraszthy,and D.D.Davisson, — 
acting for the Board of State Viticultural Commissioners, ascertained _ 


a 
4 
3 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 105 


that there were 11,000 acres of vineyard in that district, 2,500 of which 
were not then in bearing. Yields of nine and ten tons of grapes were 
noted, with an average of over three tons per acre for a full-bearing 
vineyard. 

The amount of destruction in eight years is shown by the canvass of 
A. B. Lemmon of Santa Rosa, in 1893, who found that the acreage had 
fallen off about one half. At that time 1,186 acres had been replanted 
to resistants. The yield had dwindled to about a ton per acre, against 
two and three tons for other districts in the county. 

At first men honestly differed as to the cause of ‘‘sick” vines. Some 
asserted that their soil was so rich that nothing but climatic influences 
could check the luxuriant growth and regular crops. However, when 
the vine-hopper stripped the third row from the fence line, arsenic and 
bran were brought into use. When vines feil “sick” resistant stock was 
planted, or the vineyard speedily became worth less than the naked 
land. 

Acting upon the theory that vines were starved for lack of ground, 
one man replanted an infested vineyard with the European vine, 
giving them nearly double the room; but alas, the pest took all the 
tender young vines before they bore a single crop. 

Another selected fresh alluvial soil, gave the vines ample room, and 
gathered one crop and part of another before the phylloxera closed out 
his vineyard experience with $40,000 on the wrong side of the balance 


- sheet. 


Hmil Dresel made the first successful experiments with resistant 
stock in Sonoma County. “A man of liberal education, he was thoroughly 
conversant with all of the details of wine-growing before he left Europe. 
With his associates he made the famous purchase of vineyard property 
in 1857, to which further tracts were added. The phylloxera was dis- 


_ covered in these in 1874 and 1875. 


_ Experiments with resistants were begun in 1878, and in the twelve 
years following the leading varieties of wine grapes were grafted upon 
various resistant stocks and tested in infested land. 

Julius Dresel, his son, wrote a special article on the “Success of 
Resistant Vines” in October, 1890, for the report of the State Viticul- 
tural Commissioners, advising the general replanting of dead or diseased 
vineyards to resistants. 

Speaking of the Lenoir and Riparia he stated that they should be 
planted in the nursery for one year, remain two years in the vineyard, 
be grafted during March, April, and May of the third year, and they 
would bring a fair crop in the fifth year. Cleft grafting is easily learned. 
An experienced hand can finish from one hundred and fifty to two 
hundred a day. Cut the stock half an inch above the ground, then heap 


_ the soil in a mound around the graft to protect it from the wind and 


on > 


106 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


“gun. In September after the craft has taken, remove the meee and | 

any roots that may have grown from the cion. Now the vine is perfect. = : 
Where grafting has been done below the surface it will be necessary to 
dig around the plant yearly and remove roots that will form onthe cion, 
or else these roots will draw nourishment from the leaves to the detri- ~ 
ment of the resistant roots below. Phylloxera will then kill the upper ~ 
roots and the vine sickens and dies. Apart from the cost, Mr. Dresel 
further states that they met with no serious drawback in replanting one 
hundred and fifty acres, and it would require a tedious search to find 
a single dead vine. 

In 1890 this vineyard oaieea 50,000 gallons of wine. Last ‘yearite> 
was still thrifty and pea scaply repaying superior care and — | 
cultivation. ee 

Riparia stock has been used to advantage upon the Seater Fair — 
estate near Lakeville. When the phylloxera made its appearance there - 

a decade ago, the situation was thoroughly canvassed and arrangements 
were perfected to replace with resistants the old vines as they suc- 
cumbed to the ravages of the pest, and add enough to bring the vine- - 
yard up to a round five hundred acres. A visit there this year showed 
that the Riparia is making a vigorous growth and that the new vines 

are entirely healthy. Grafting goes on yearly as extensively as the 
season will permit. Blocks of vines grafted in 1898 yielded upward of 
a ton per acre this poor year. | 

Certain varieties of the Riparia are especially adapted to the deep 
black loam or adobe soils of the Bay region, where the beneficent fogs 
are almost equal to a succession of showers, but the wine-growing center 
has steadily receded from the bay and the phylloxera has just as per- 
sistently followed the movement in quest of its preferred food. 

While the Riparia strikes diagonally into the rich soils of the Bay 
region, it quickly resumes its natural habit of lateral rooting when it is — 
planted inland. In its Missouri home it is found growing along the 
river bank, from which it takes its name. : 

The Lenoir and Tokay do very well in deep alluvial soils. a 

The Rupestris St. George, a rock-climber, is a favorite for the drier — 
upland soils of the interior, on account of its deep-rooting qualities. 

The Rampendahl Vigorosa was first named “ Vigorosa”’ on account 
of its vigorous growth, and later ‘‘ Rampendahl” was affixed in honor 
of its discoverer, Prof. A.C. Rampendahl, of St. Helena, who found 
the vine on the side of a mountain ravine, while on a hunting trip in © 
1885. He was attracted by the beauty of its long, uniform, reddish 
trunk, which was from 35 to 40 feet in length, with an average diameter 
of four inches. Napa County was sadly in need of a reliable resistant 
stock to renew her fast failing vineyards and restore land values by — 
making the ground profitable. This vine was something entinelys new. 


{ 


tug 
iP es 


; Ren oh ko ae asa ene ae Sa ee 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 1072 


‘It was totally unlike the Californica. When the vine started scores of 
_ years before, it is extremely doubtful if there was a specimen of the 
-Vinifera within fifty miles of it. Here was a vine with the vigor of the 


Mission under the most favorable circumstances. Climbing some 
twenty feet into the tree that supported this wonderful vine, Professor 
Rampendahl secured seven cuttings from the dense top growth. 

Last October I saw a vine growing from one of those cuttings, in the 
midst of a vineyard that has been infested by the phylloxera for years, 


even before this Vigorosa was placed there, fourteen years ago. This 


Vineyard was deemed of so little value last year that the renter had 


planted it to corn, and in cultivating that crop had destroyed a con- 


siderable portion of the ends of the shoots from the Vigorosa. Despite 
this there were fifty shoots, which, with their laterals, showed an 


average of 50 feet of new wood, or a growth of fully 2,500 feet for this 


season. One of these shoots, now on exhibition in Horticultural Hall 
at Santa Rosa, measures, including laterals, 54 feet. I picked a few 


table grapes from old vines that were struggling along 16 feet from this 


Vigorosa. The vineyard showed plainly the effect of the pest by 


‘missing vines, poor growth, and light bearing. Sinking a well within 
_ 80 feet of his oldest Vigorosa, Professor Rampendahl found a scanty 
supply of water at a depth of 22 feet. 


The contrast between the old vineyard and new blocks of. Vigorosa 
which have been planted where old vines have been removed was most 
remarkable. The luxuriant and symmetrical growth was wonderful. I 


did not note a single vine missing or any weakness in any of the 


Vigorosas. They stand on a rich, alluvial, well-drained soil. 
The late W. H. Crabb, of Oakville, gave the Vigorosa a practical test 


in very dry, gravelly soil. Much of the Oakville property is of this 


character. The Vigorosa shows better growth in the Crabb vineyard 
than any other of the resistant stocks tested there. In fact, it has been 
specially marked on account of its exceptional growth. In many cases — 


the shoots from it have been trained to vines 8 and 16 feet away to 


protect them from injury. 


Luther Burbank, of Santa Rosa, says that there is no question about 
the resistant qualities of the Rampendahl Vigorosa, and that it is 
worthy of experimenting with upon its wood and root development 


alone. 


Mr. GORDON. A gentleman stated, or rather advised the grape- 


- growers of Fresno, not to import rooted resistant vine stocks into the 


county until such time as they are sure they have phylloxera, for he 
said whenever resistant stocks are ees the phylloxera comes with 


e them: 


- 


CAPT. ‘#A. A. BRAINARD. I know of the results in three or four or 


B. five instances in Santa Clara County, where they were the centers of 


. md eS 


ee eee : Sete we 


108 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


phylloxera, and I believe it was brought on rooted vines. Cuttings 5 a: 


taken at the time cuttings are usually taken do not have phylloxera on — 


them. I will say it is hard to take rooted vines and transfer them with- 
out transferring phylloxera. These resistant vines always have some 


phylloxera on them. 

Mr. CRAW.. I would like to remind the grape-growers that it is not 
the phylloxera alone that they have to look out for, but they must also 
look out for the mysterious Anaheim disease, which attacks all kinds of 
stocks, resistant and non-resistant. 


TWO NEW GRAPES OF PROMISE. 


By PROF. GEORGE HUSMANN, or Napa. 


Hungarian Millennium.—In May, 1897, Professor Heiges, then U.S. 


Pomologist, sent me four cions of the Hungarian Millennium grape, 
accompanied by the following letter: 


This grape was named in commemoration of the foundation of Hungary as a nation, 


one thousand years ago. The cions were sent by Sigismund Keekemet, Pesth, Hungary. 
The illustrations accompanying the cions present a magnificent bunch, with large indi- _ 


vidual berries. We retained some of the cions and propagated from single eyes, fearing 
there might be difficulty in getting them to unite with stocks in their apparently dried 
condition. We have forty promising plants which we can send out next fall, should 
grafting fail. 


The four cions received were grafted on strong resistant vines. Three — 


of them united well and made a strong growth, so that they already set 
an abundant crop in 1898. They bore a full crop this season, were ripe 
on the 15th of September, when the following description was taken: 
Vine a strong grower, with close joints; Leaf large and heavy, heart- 
shaped, seldom lobed; pale green, downy beneath; vine very productive— 
adapted to stool or close pruning, bearing an abundant second crop, of 
fair-sized bunches and berries, which fully ripened and proved of fine 
quality the last of October; Bunch medium to large, compact, shouldered ; 


Berry large, round, resembling the Malaga in size and color; white or 
pale yellow; transparent, with few seeds, very sweet, of pure flavor, skin 


not thick but tough; will ship well; quality best. 
I am fully satisfied that this will be a fine market and table grape, as 
it kept here in excellent condition for over two weeks. I also believe 


that it will make a fine white wine, though of course it could not be 


tested for that yet. 


The Hybrid Franc.—This grape was much lauded in French reports 
as entirely resistant and making a choice red wine. It originated with 
Mr. Franc, was named after him, and awarded a medal. It is a hybrid 
between the wild Rupestris and the Cabernet Sauvignon; said to unite 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 109 


the good qualities of its parents with abundant productiveness. From 


what I saw of it before, I was not favorably impressed, but by the kind- 
ness of Dr. A. N. Coomes, of Cloverdale, I received a small box of grapes 


taken from a vine grafted two years ago, which produced one hundred 
and twenty bunches this year, produced by spur pruning on laterals. 
The grapes arrived in poor condition, being over-ripe, and the following 
is a description of the bunch and berry: Bunch cylindrical, small, 
rather loose, not shouldered; Berry black, with blue bloom, round, about 
the size of Cabernet Sauvignon, very juicy and tender, with the flavor 
resembling its parent, the Sauvignon. The juice is very dark purplish 
with immense color, so that it stains the fingers—the darkest I have yet 
seen in any cultivated grape. 

These two grapes may be said to represent two extremes—the one a 


pure white, with a heavy bunch and berry; the other small, very delicate, 


promising for a very dark-colored wine, and especially for blending with 
light-colored wines. 
As all new varieties are naturally hard to obtain and expensive; I 


_ would advise our growers to use the few cions they can obtain for graft- 


ing on strong vines, which will give them an abundance of cuttings the 
next season—a much speedier and cheaper way to raise good stock than 
buying cuttings at high prices. 

In reply to an inquiry relative to the value of this stock, Mr. Wm. J. 
Laferier, of Cloverdale, writes: 


My pear Fripnp: Answering your inquiry about Dr. Coomes’ Hybrid Franc, I will 
say that I have seen it several times and even have modified the pruning at the beginning 
of last March. The vine (two years old) is a graft of an old Mission grown under fruit — 
trees. It is a very strong grower, exactly similar to the Cabernet Sauvignon, of which 
it has retained all the characteristics. The wood may be a little darker, but it has the 
same nuances, same buds, grows the same way, of same size, and the fruits are much 
alike, at least the bunches. It has impressed me deeply and I really fell in love with it. 
Nevertheless, I would like to see it on its own roots before advising any one to 
plant it extensively. In grafting the Hybrid Franc on an old mother Mission growing 
under trees, Dr. Coomes has followed the queer idea of our much-regretted Mr. 
Crabb, and consequently if the. Hybrid Franc grows well even as a graft under such 
conditions and treatment, what will it do under proper treatment and conditions and 
the care of a true vineyardist, whether grafted or growing on its own roots? Asan 
answer to this question I would say, that if I had to start a vineyard I would try to 
get as many Hybrid Francs as possible, as grafting stock or as direct bearers, but 


especially as grafting stock, as I am sure itis thoroughly resistant. As abearer it is 


very prolific, for I have counted with Dr. Coomes one hundred and twenty clusters. 
As a direct bearer it would be good for blending, but especially as a ‘‘ doctor,” for I 
don’t believe that alone it would ever make good drinking wine. Butif ever it does 


under proper management, it is the most valuable plant we now have in California. 


For my part I think its best value is asa direct bearer, and will be as a blend for 
Zinfandel, and if so Zinfandel is worth having, but otherwise should be replaced at 
once by superior varieties. I am-very much interested in the Hybrid France, and will 
watch it and study it as much as I possibly can. Following is an abstract of a few 
notes sent to me.by Professor Frane, of the nursery of the Department of Cher, France: 

‘The Hybrid Franc is the product of seeds of Rupestris planted in the department 
nursery in 1886. In July of the same year it had made a fine, vigorous, and straight 


110 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


growth, three times more developed and higher than all the others of the same age. _ 
The first plant produced fruit in 1889. Since, its fructification has been extremely — 
prolific. In 1890 I planted rooted cuttings in the same spots where vines had died from ; pe A 
phylloxera. To-day (1899) these vines are extremely vigorous, and their fertility sur- 
passes any other variety. Each vine produces from eighty to one hundred clusters of 
medium size, and the stock is large. The bunches are of different sizes, similar to the — 
Pineaus, but the berries are not so tight together. The berries are spheric, longer, 
black, with thin skin, the juice deep red and agreeable to thetaste. Atthenursery 
the three-year-old plants have always produced from thirty to forty bunches, and those = 
of four years old from sixty to eighty. The wine is very red, and of good taste, and is — 3 
from ten to eleven per cent of alcohol. The Hybrid Franc is entirely phylloxera-proof, a 
as I have never been able to find any phylloxera on its roots. It deserves, therefore, 
the first place at the top of the scale of resistants. Mildew, oidium, or anthracnosehaye _ 
never attacked it. It seems at home in any kind of soil, and does well even in those _ 
containing from thirty to forty per cent of lime carbonate. In swampy.ordamp soilit 
grows rapidly. It is very hardy against heavy frosts, and if its first buds are damaged 
- by the frost, the second buds grow rapidly and give a fine crop. It roots very easily. 
Any cutting of two or three buds planted in any soil of medium fertility, grows readily 
and gives abundant roots. There is no plant in existence that can be propagated by 
cutting as easily as the Hybrid Franc. It will grow under any kind of training, but 
the best is long pruning. pine is the Hybrid Franc that I have studied with pee 
greatest care during nine years.’ et 
After all these good words what can you do? Try and verify the facts instead of 

condemning in adyance because they are from a Frenchman. 


Resistant Stocks.—Of these, there seem to be but two prominently 
before the public now—the Bourquiniana class (of which the Lenoir 
is the most prominent representative) and the Rupestris, with its 
improved varieties, Rupestris St. George and the Martin. The Riparia, 
planted so largely in many places years ago, has failed lamentably in 
dry soils and the interior hot valleys, while it still flourishes well when 
planted in deep soils and under the influence of the moist air from the 
bay or the sea. 

The Bourquiniana class has been traced back to Southern France by 
Professor Munson, of Denison, Texas, who claims that the Huguenot 
immigrants brought them to the Southern States one hundred and fifty 
years ago. It comprises the Lenoir, Hubemont, Louisiana, and Cun- 
ningham. Of the first, cions were sent by me from Missouri to the late : 
lamented H. W. Crabb in 1876, who was then in quest of a coloring 
grape. It has withstood all the ravages of the phylloxera for the 
last twenty years; is a splendid, strong, and upright grower, and 
strikes its roots deep into the subsoil, withstanding drought remarkably © 
well, and also makes a good, very dark-colored wine; it takes the graft — 
readily. The other varieties are equally desirable for stocks. . 

Rupestris.—This class are natives of the dry ridges of southwest 
Missouri, Arkansas, and Texas, also known as Bush or Sugar grape. 
All of them have a tendency to root deeply and readily from cuttings, 
and therefore are especially adapted to dry soils. The cuttings, orca . 
ally taken from the woods, came from seedlings with all their natural 
variations in growth and habit. Large quantities were shipped to 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 5 ae 


ae France more than twenty-five years ago, of which a few were selected 


by the best savants there for their vigorous and upright growth. Fore- 


most of these seem to be Rupestris St. George and Martin. What I 


have seen of the Rupestris St. George is certainly very favorable. It 
roots readily, striking downward with its roots like a bird with its 
claws, and Mr. Jacob Beringer, one of our best vineyardists, has shown 
me vines, planted in 1898 as cuttings and grafted the next spring, 
which produced several fine bunches in 1899, and are strong enough to 
bear a full crop next year. Mr. Paul Masson, of San José, who 
imported it five years ago from France, is also enthusiastic in its 
promise, and says he wants no better stock for grafting. : 

I fully believe that with these two varieties as a basis our vineyards 
can be established on a safe footing, and grape-growing become one of 
the leading and most lucrative industries of the State. 


APPLE CULTURE. 


Essay By EDWARD BERWICK, or Monterey. 


Mr. CHarrMaAn, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: I must crave your indul- 
gence for departing somewhat from the printed program. I have no 
‘written essay.” I will, however, essay to talk to you on apple culture, 
and you must assay what I say and separate the gold of truth from the 
dross of error. 

- When I was a youngster I was taught to mind my P’s and Q’s. 
To-night. 11] mind the P’s only (referring to his chart*). They are the 


_ points I hope to make. The Q’s shall be yours, the queries you put to 


me afterward. 


P No. 1is Preliminary. What king goes to war without first sitting 

down and counting the cost? So, likewise, must the would-be apple- 
grower. He must size up, not.only his pecuniary pile, but also his pile 
of patience and perseverance. Can he afford to wait ten years for a 
harvest? Can he exercise ten years of ‘‘eternal vigilance” in his unceas- 
ing fight with legions innumerable of untiring foes? Then does he sigh 
to be an apple king, or will he be happy as an apple-princelet, or even 
a plain apple-grower? Take my advice and don’t try to own the earth. 
Let the other fellow have a chance as well. 


Then as to P No. 2—Position. Determine what kind of apples you 
want to grow and to what market you expect to ship them. If you want 


*Prior to his talk on apple culture, Mr. Berwick pinned on the wall his notes—a 
sheet of white cloth, on which was painted in black a large capital P, the initial letter 
of all points touched on, this being appended below, as follows: Preliminary, Position, 
_ Plowing, Planting, Pollination, Pruning, Pests (painted very black), Picking, Packing, 
Prices, Profits, Pie, Pudding. 


112 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCKEDINGS OF THE 


to hit the early market, a location for this purpose will not be suitable 
for main crop or late-keeping apples, and vice versa. Get as near cheap 
transportation facilities as possible, and don’t plant your orchard too — 
near the village school: young America has a passion for green colic. 
See that the soil suits the variety or varieties you fancy, and that the rain- 
fall record of dry years in the past warrants your planting at all in that. 
particular locality. See that the elements of fertility abound in your 
soil, by haying thorough analyses made by competent chemists; or take 
the credentials the past harvests have given to that soil; but don’t think 
any old soil is good enough for fruit trees. Don’t decide in haste and 
repent at leisure. Don’t swallow all the first land-shark tells you. 
Consult Wickson’s “California Fruits,” as to what localities are best for 
certain varieties. 


P No. 8 is Plowing. All I can say is plow as deep as you can, then 
just a little deeper. Remember it is your last chance for unobstructed 
plowing of all your ground. | 


Planting.—As to distance, 80 feet is not a bit too far. I have some — 
trees 15 x 80 feet, and three trees so set will not give as much fruit as 
one 80x 30. J usually prefer yearling trees, and cut them back to 20 
or 24 inches above ground. LHarly in the season, say mid-January, is 
the time I find best for planting in normal seasons. Should the season 
prove dry, give twenty pails of water to each tree soon after setting, — 
and once or twice thereafter as occasion dictates. As to varieties, stick 
to staple goods that the market calls for. Spitzenbergs usually sell 
best; Newtown Pippins are a world-staple, and Bellflowers are in 
immense demand in America. White Winter Pearmains bear early and 
heavily, but price is not so good. Red Astrachan is a good early variety 
for near markets, but if left to get near ripe soon blackens in transit. 
Gravenstein is a first-class shipper and probably the best all around 
second early, if you can find a locality to suit it; it sells well. 


Pollination demands that you should not plant solid blocks of single 
varieties, but that every third or fourth row should be of a different — 


variety, that cross-fertilization, which is said to produce better and 


larger fruit, should be easily effected. This subject is fully explained 
in the Agricultural Yearbook for 1898, which you can obtain from your 
Congressman at Washington, and it would take too long to detail here. 
Lack of attention to this subject sometimes results in lack of crop. 


Pruning varies as varieties vary. The growth of a Yellow Newtown 
Pippin tree and a Bellflower tree obviously demands entirely different 
treatment. I am a believer in low heads for the following reasons: 
The tree does not waste its strength in supporting a huge trunk. The — 


wind has less leverage on a head near the ground than on a head 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 3 A 


; | capping a 12-foot trunk; the branches therefore sway less and don’t 


throw their fruit so easily. Pruning, thinning, and picking are each 
more readily accomplished when the head is near the ground than 
when a 14-foot stepladder has to be climbed to get toit. The trunk is 
effectually protected from sun-scald, and fruit on the lower limbs in 
the interior of the tree get the benefit of heat and light reflected from 
the ground around. Spraying is also easier. Prune for several years 
to make wood, rather than crowd your young trees into fruit-bearing; 


it will pay you in the long run. 


Pests.—You will notice I have printed “ Pests” very black on my 
chart. If you’ll believe me, they are even blacker than I have painted 


them. They are truly the orchardists’ bete noire (black beast). Sum- 


mer and winter alike they demand eternal vigilance. Probably the 
worst or most insidious is the woolly aphis (called in Australia 


“American blight”). To kill the aphis as it appears above ground the 


only method I know is to dab the clusters with a brush charged with 
gasoline. The process is tedious and expensive, but it pays. It saves 


your fruit from becoming sticky and black, and your twigs from 


being disfigured and devitalized by a mass of unsightly excrescences. 
To get at the creatures below ground tobacco dust or ashes liberally 
applied at the root crown are both recommended. Don’t use coal oil, 


either above or below ground; it will injure your trees. 


Resistant roots, such as Northern Spy (pieces of which with auxiliary 


roots were sent out by Secretary Lelong last spring), should, if possible, 
be tried in any new plantation. 


Codling moth is now present in nearly all apple sections. Bands of 
sacking, to which the worm resorts for pupation, are valuable, if prop- 
erly examined and the worms destroyed about every two weeks. Or 
Thissell’s trap, a globe of wire screening tacked tightly around the tree 
and inclosing the band in a moth-proof cage, may be used to obviate 
the need of searching the bands. In either case, all loose bark must be 
scraped off. Paris green, sprayed according to Bulletin No. 126, issued — 
by the University of California, is still the remedy in best repute for 
efficiency. Lime, sulphur, and salt wash for scale, applied in winter, 
and Bordeaux mixture for scab when needed, are both advisable. Leaf- 
roller, cankerworm, and pear slug are all killed by the Paris green. 

For leaf mildew, dry sulphur sprinkled through an old barley sack 
when- leaves are damp with dew is a good preventive. Those who 
want to know more of insect pests should attend the forthcoming 
lectures at Stanford University, beginning February 5th. Professors 


Comstock and Kellogg are both expected to be there to instruct the 
- visiting fruit-growers. 


8—BH 


114 ~ OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


_ Picking.—If you want your fruit to keep well, pick before the seeds _ 
get quite black. Handle as you would handle eggs. Put an old sack 
or a wad of leaves or straw at the bottom of your buckets or baskets sO 
as not to have the first picked apples rolling around on hard material. 
Handle as little as possible. Sort out any defective or wormy fruit aca 
dispose of it at once. Don’t ship it to glut the market with trash and — 
spoil the sale of your own good fruit. Hogs, driers, cider presses, e 
vinegar barrels are all available. | | fri 


Packing.—Pack in standard size boxes, 10x11x22 inches. This ; 
size box was adopted as a “free package” when the rule was made that __ 
apple boxes should not be returned to the shipper. The box was 
reduced from 11x12 x 22 to compensate the shipper for the loss of his ae 
box by using one that held fewer apples. Now, some growers are 
altogether too generous—they give the old nore of eue and a “free 
package” as well. = 

Pack honestly—same size and quality throughout; but the ene pe. 
expects you to pack your most highly colored fruit on top, so as to 
please the eye. The eye does the buying usually in all commodities. 
For green or yellow apples, line your boxes with red paper. White- 
wood boxes are preferred by the trade. Be careful not’ to have your 
' boxes underfilled. -At the ends the fruit should be just on a level with 
the top of the box, but should crown up at least half an inch in the 
center so as to nail every apple snug in its place, so as not to rattle i in. 
the box when it is shaken. If the end apples are too high, nailing Ones 
the lid is apt to bruise them, and on opening the box big black oo < F 
disfigure your fruit and diminish its price. ee 


Prices are usually good if you have fine, qalibecne, bright-colored, 
nice-flavored fruit. If you care to study the curve of price in foreign 
markets, there is a chart published by Woodall & Co., of Liverpool, 
giving the ups and downs for the last five years on the basis of Bald- __ 
wins of four classes—Canadian, New York, Boston, and Maine. Cana- ee 
dian are invariably highest, probably because the barrel is full weight. __ 
Early spring or late winter usually bring biggest prices. November is 
about the worst month to sell. Often, in our San Francisco market, __ 
Thanksgiving time is as good as any for ripe, high-colored fruit. Ne 
Apples sell for cash f. 0. b. Beliflowers ranged this year from 75 cents — is 
to $1.00 a box, and the demand exceeded the supply. 5 


Profits depend much on the grower’s willingness to give liberal care to a 
his business. Don’t try to get rich by declining to spend the needful — 
money to fertilize, prune, cultivate, and spray your orchard. Don’t be ake 
afraid to thin your fruit because you think it expensive, and fear theless =e 
will not be enough left to make a crop. In orcharding, follow the | 


- {TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 115 


_ seriptural injunction, “Cast thy bread upon the waters, and thou shalt 
_ find it after many days.” Treat your trees in a generous fashion, and 
they will respond generously; act the niggard toward them, and they 


will repay you in kind. Some Watsonville orchards pay their owners 
from $150 to $250 an acre per annum, and their yield is so bountiful as 
to make fortunes for the shippers, whose business is simply to pick, 
pack, and ship. It is safe to say that so long as apples will bring 75 
cents to $1.00 f. 0. b. there is a handsome profit for the careful grower 


~ who handles his own fruit. 


Pie, next on my notes, demands your special attention. At a former 
convention, Mr. O’Brien suggested, to my astonishment, that it was 
necessary to start a campaign of education to teach the English people 


to eat fruit. Having myself had considerable knowledge of that people 


in their homes, I replied that if Americans would themselves eat fruit 
as the English do there would be little left to export. Pie in particular 
does not consist, in England, of a thin layer of over-sweetened fruit 


between two layers of indigestible, half-baked paste. Your English cook 


takes a dish of from two to four inches deep, fills it—piled up—with 
fruit, adding sugar and a drop of water, inverts an empty cup in the 
center to catch the juice, puts on a light flaky crust, and bakes till the 
fruit is tender and the crust a rich brown. Then this pie is not served 
in little saucers, but on large pie plates, and two good platefuls are 


allowed the hungry schoolboy. 


Pudding is made in the same luscious fashion. A light crust of suet, 


flour, and water is spread over a cloth (previously wrung out of boiling 
water and then dredged with flour); apples, cored and sliced, to fill a 


- globe of say eight inches diameter, are then placed, with sugar, cloves, 


and water, in the crust; the edges thereof are drawn up and welted to 
make them adhere and forma water-tight globe; the cloth is tied tightly 
and the pudding plunged into a pot of boiling water and boiled fast for 


four hours. Apples by the ton are used daily to make these delicious 
puddings for the city of Londonalone. If all America would enjoy these 


splendid combinations of flour and fruit as do the English, Americans 


would be a healthier, happier, and more “pieus” people; and apple-cul- 


ture would flourish in the land a thousandfold. 
So mote it be! Amen! 


116 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


FOURTH DAY—FRIDAY, 


DECEMBER 15, 1899. 


Topics FoR THE Day: Our Export Fruit Trade; 
_ Export Fruit Packages; 
_ Fertilizing and Irrigation; 
The Citrus and Olive Industries. 


At 9:30 o’clock a. m. President Cooper called the convention to order. 


OUR FRUITS IN EUROPEAN MARKETS. 


By HON. EUGENE GERMAIN, or Los ANGELEs, 
Late United States Consul to Switzerland, 


Mr. PresIDENT, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: In addressing a representa- 
_ tive body comprising the fruit-growers, packers, and handlers of our 


orchard products, I appreciate the fact that I am speaking to the back- _ 
bone of our State—our basic industry and its defenders and champions. 
For California is, after all, a veritable fruit-producing and fruit-ship- 
pipg empire, whose superior products have long since outgrown local 


dimensions, and are now entering the leading markets of the world. 
The Anglo-Saxon, the Latin, and the people of the Orient are all being 
‘drummed up” to the idea of buying the California dried prune and 
apricot, the California dried peach, and the superb California raisin, 


not to mention our canned fruits, marmalades, jams, and jellies. All ~ 
this intensity of purpose in extending our markets; in crowding out 


competition from other sources; in devising ways and means to draw 
attention; in hammering Serer at every country’s door to let 


in American products and California fruit, is as typical of our people 


as our fruit is superior. It is the leaven that is making the country of 
the Stars and Stripes the greatest nation on the face of the earth; it is 
the spirit that is making of imperial California the greatest fruit-pro- 
ducing portion of that same country. 


Ba 


It will not be in place for me here to dilate upon the present status 


of the fruit industry as it applies to production. That portion of our 


subject is now well understood by you all. We know conclusively that 
the matter of production, with all its attendant issues, has been glori~ 
ously and successfully solved by brainy men and bright women, who 


4 er a! ahi ie 
salde 2: 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION, ll'7 


have not only made two blades of grass to grow where only one grew 
before, but who have also made two drops of water to flow where none 


flowed before. In brief, it is no longer a question of what we can grow. 
but of what we can sell, and the development of reliable and profitable- 
markets. 

And that leads me to the principal point in the whole problem— 
namely, a broad-gauge commercial integrity— honest goods honestly 
packed and honestly labeled. Of course I appreciate the irony of fate 
that has decreed the attributes of Bret Harte’s “peculiar” heathen. 


. Chinee all to the fruit-packers and fruit-shippers, and all the virtues to 


the fruit-growers; but that does not alter my plea for commercial integ- 
rity; it is the only road to permanent success in any market, either at 
home or abroad. As a basic principle the fruit-grower should produce 
only A 1 fruit—his market product should be free of all wormy, under- 
sized, warty specimens, of windfalls and bruised specimens, and consist 
of only a prime article. This once conscientiously observed, and the | 
battle is half won, whether the product is sold fresh, canned, or cured. 


This honesty and aim at superior production should be observed all 
along the line until the finished and packed product reaches the 


consumers’ tables in London, Berlin, Vienna, Paris, Rome, Manila, or 
Hongkong. If eternal vigilance is the price of liberty, then commercial 


integrity and honest goods. honestly packed is the price of permanent 


success for our orchard products in the foreign markets. This fact is — 
inexorable; to deviate from it in the slightest degree is only to invite 
disaster. | 

_ These basic principles once thoroughly established in our ambitions 
to enter the Kuropean markets, and we shall make healthy progress. 
Our next step must be to study Huropean. conditions and practices. 
You must always bear in mind that the people of Europe are a trifle 
older in many ways than we are. Briefly stated, it seems to me essen- 
tial that in style of package, methods of marketing, even as to 


methods of preparation, we should, in so far as is expedient, meet the 


customs and practices of the European seller and consumer. Another 
point is uniformity of package. Particularly does this apply to dried 
fruits. , 
These things carefully observed, and when coupled to commercial 
integrity, will certainly be a long step toward. a permanent place for our 
fruits in HKuropean markets. © 
_ A residence in Europe extending over nearly five years in the consular 
service, where my duties put me in close touch with our trade relations 
with European centers, has enabled me to give this subject some atten- 


tion. And let me say right here, without boasting and without fear of 


contradiction, that when we do pack our very best product honestly, and 
observe the eternal laws of commercial integrity to give value for value, 


118 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


the products of our orchards and earden are the peers of the moet os: 
that nowhere are there produced better peaches, prunes, apricots, ane 5 
raisins. The trade is keenly alive to this fact, recognizes it, and is ready 5 
‘to profit by it; in short, to send us its money if we will only encourage ae 


it along correct lines. 
Our prunes, apricots, peaches, pears, apples, and raisins are now ae ‘be 


found on sale in almost every grocery and delicatessen shop of Central ne 
Europe; the masses being thus enabled to purchase at reasonable figures, _ 


which in former years were prohibitory. Green fruits of all kinds during — : 
the long winter months are expensive, hence the poorer people cannot . 


afford to buy them. Now, however, they can purchase California dried 


fruits in lieu of the expensive green article, which as a rule is utterly aes 


tasteless. When properly prepared our fruits have been found delicious, 


. 


with an unsurpassed flavor, and with the added advantage that they are : 


cheaper, go farther, and that a supply can be laid in early in the season _ 


without fear of decay or deterioration. Now, while we have succeeded in — 


introducing our dried fruits, thereby enlarging the outlet and conse- 


quently tending to an increase of our tree acreage, enhancing thereby the — 


value of our lands and taxing capacity of our commonwealth, we must _ 


try not only to hold on to the territory we supply, but ought to increase 


our exports annually. This; however, cannot be done with the methods | 


employed. 

This is certainly a great advantage, ated if honestly followed up 
must lead to permanent results far-reaching in their consequences, 
meaning not only prosperity in the exportation of our orchard products, 
but an augmented prosperity at home, as it naturally leads to an 
increase of land values, of acreage under cultivation, and of healthier 
conditions all along the line. 

We must sell first-class, medium, and inferior fruits for what they 


are and at graduated prices in accordance with quality. The label on — 


a box must never belie its contents. Foreign purchasers must know 
that they will get just what they buy and nothing else. Weare grading 
our prunes and denominate same by sizes, each size being offered at a 
different figure; or, in other words, the price is made on a basis of a 


certain size, with a stated increase in price for the larger fruit. The 


prune business has, under this mode, proved satisfactory and hardly 


any complaints have been received. Why not do likewise with apri- 
cots, pears, peaches, and other dried fruits? Why not grade all 


according to the size, color, and quality of the fruit, and brand the boxes 
“Fancy,” “Extra,” ‘‘Choice,” “Standard,” and “Common,” each of 


these brands representing what the denomination on the box implies? ‘eu 


Why not have the authorities appoint sworn inspectors, whose duty 


would be to inspect all dried fruits before boxing, and brand the boxes: 


according to grade and quality? A law ought to be passed prohibiting 


Ess! 


Pie 
MAE Fe: s%3 PS ees 

“ = “s 1 > 

+ 2 a ir. ete, Teas a 


= 
e. 
x y 
7 

4 
Re 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 119 


; the shipping of dried fruits unless accompanied by an inspector’s cer- 


_ tificate showing that the fruit has been properly graded according to 
~ law. - 


United States Consul-General Mason, stationed at Berlin, in a recent 
report very ably called attention to our mode of packing fancy fruit on 


tops of boxes and then filling in with rubbish. Let me briefly and 


specifically quote his exact words, because they substantiate and 


emphasize all I have already said: 


_ In respect to dried apricots, pears, and peaches, it may be said that the fruits from 
the Pacific Coast dominate the control of the markets of continental Europe. Nothing 
comparable with them in point of size, flavor, tenderness, and general excellency was 
ever seen in Europe until they were imported. They established new standards of 


excellence, and created a new market which, if the trade is properly managed, they 


can hold in future against any competition. The higher grades of California prunes 


are a revelation to European consumers, being not only cheaper than French prunes 


of approximate quality, but of such excellence that they are sold in small, ready-made 
packages, and eaten raw as sweetmeats, like candy or caramels. In a season when the 
Bosnia prune crop should fail entirely, as sometimes happens, American prunes, even 
of the smallest grades, would control the market of Germany. 

Is there any complaint as to dishonest packing or grading of dried fruits from the 
United States, and what needs yet to be done to improve the trade and render it stable 


- and permanent? 


There has been to my knowledge more or less complaint in regard to packing and 
assorting of American dried fruits. I never have investigated a case of this kind in 
which the complaint did not prove to be fully sustained. I examined yesterday the 
first box of dried apricots from this season’s crop, which just arrived from one of the 
foremost packing firms of California, a house whose brand on the packing case usually 
is accepted as a guarantee of quality. On removing the lid the fruit appeared in neatly 
arranged layers; the pieces large, firm, and of uniform size and color; the dried flesh as 
translucent as gelatin and of fine aromatic flavor. The box being turned over and the 
bottom removed, a wholly different picture was revealed. There the fruit had been 
loosely thrown in in pieces of all sizes, mainly Small, irregular in shape, and of all 
shades of color, from the golden brown to deep mahogany, many pieces showing by 
their form that they had been saved from apricots which had been partially decayed. 
All these were good enough to be eaten, but were not what the buyer ordered and paid 
for, nor what the seller pretended to sell, and as the disappointed importer somewhat 


_ bitterly remarked, ‘‘If this is what we get from a first-class exporter, who puts up his 


own fruit, what may we expect from jobbers who gather up and export the miscellaneous 


- products of small packers and individual farmers?”’ 


The truth is, and may as well be stated with plainness, the dried fruit industry of- 


_ the Pacific Coast is not yet organized and managed as it should be to achieve the best 


f 


results and give its European export trade the permanence and stability which it 
deserves and ought to attain. The fruit farmers of the Pacific Slope have before them 
an unparalleled opportunity, but their fruit made a market abroad on its own merits 
and not by virtue of any especially able or foresighted management. 

Complaints also have been made that old, left-over dried fruits from the preyious 
year have been steamed, repacked, and shipped to Europe as part of the new crop. To 
what extent this charge is true, it would be difficult to say, but if it ever has been 
done, or any other artifice practiced which is below the accepted standard that business 
merits, all such methods should be stopped. 


Other consuls have from time to time reported the same thing, and 
during my five years’ tenure of office in the consular service I had 


occasion to verify these criticisms. I have in my reports to the Depart- 


ment several times called our packers’ attention to these facts. 


- \ 
ee 


ee Pi) OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


Touching this rather suggestive phase of the subject, let me give just of 
one personal incident which may relieve the packers and shippers of any | 
- facetious reflections I may have made ina previous paragraph, which goes _ 
to prove that all flesh is grass afterall. During the early eighties I exploited 
the shipment of early potatoes to the East; in fact, built up a good trade © 
in that line, and was, you might say, doing well. But suddenly I received 


dispatches to cease shipping marbles. Now that was soothing and pleas- 


. ant. An investigation into the field, made swb rosa, brought to light a 
curious fact or two. For instance, some growers were packing potatoes 
by thestove-pipe method. Now that was curious, but very simple, though — 


remindful of Dickens’ Artful Dodger. The method was to fill the bottom — 


of the sack with a layer of good size potatoes, then insert the stove-pipe, 
fill in with big potatoes all around it, then fill the pipe itself with small 
potatoes—what my telegrams designated as marbles—then pull out the 
pipe, fill the top of the bag with larger ones again, and, presto change, 
we have a splendid sack of big potatoes. The moral is, do not ship 7 
marbles with soil products; it doesn’t pay. : 

These few cursory remarks lead up to the observance of a few things 
we must de in order to gain permanent success in exporting fruit : 
products, and also to some we must not do. 

The teachings of Rudyard Kipling apply forcibly to everyday business, 
viz: Give the world the very best there is in you, or it will turn you 
down. Grow, pack, grade, and ship only the very best fruit you can 
produce, and the European markets are yours; observe a strict commer- 
cial integrity, and.they are yours to keep for all time. 


IRRIGATION. 


By 8S. M. WOODBRIDGE, Pu.D., or Los ANGELES. 


Irrigation is the artificial watering of the soil for the production of — 
crops. ; | 
Although irrigation is looked upon by many as a new propominess ‘it 
is, in fact, the most primitive method of producing crops; that is, it is 
the oldest method, for according to written history, “A river went out — 
of Eden to water the garden.” Furthermore, it was the only method of | | 
producing crops for the first third of human existence; for, from the 
same authority above quoted, we read: “The Lord God had not caused 
it to rain upon theearth.” Asit appears that water was only distributed — 
through irrigating ditches for the first third of the world’s written history, 
it is not improbable that when Abel took his sheep down to Cain’s irri- 


gating ditcn to water them, he made this water business a pretext-for 
“doing up” Abel. The precedent of making trouble over water thus 


established, has been pretty well followed down to the present time. | 
The first rain that we have any record of was in the year B. C. 2349, 


F Wey 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 121 


a and there has been nothing equal to it since; that rain is commonly 


known in history as The Flood. Agnostics think that they have scored 
a point when they state that the properties of light must have been just 
the same before the flood as since, and claim that the bow must have 
existed from the beginning; but they overlook the fact that the whole 
agricultural business was run on an irrigation plan and that there was 
no rain previous to the flood. 

Water for irrigation purposes is derived from three sources in 
California: oe 
_ 1. Mountain and other streams. 
2. Wells—flowing or pumped. 

8. Reservoirs. 

_ Of the above named sources, it would seem that the reservoir is the 
most important, for every available foot of land can be made a reservoir. 
In the technical sense a reservoir is ‘‘a basin, either natural or artificial, 
for collecting and retaining water or other liquids.” 

There are two essentials to make a reservoir a success: First, there 
must be means for collecting the water; and second, means for retain- 

ing it until it is needed. When we-speak of soils and mountains as 
- reservoirs, the word is not used in the technical sense, for I believe that 
the great volume of water that continues to flow from our mountains 
is held in the interstices of the soil and rocks. 

My own investigation shows that our different soils hold from 17 to 
96 per cent of water, although some authorities make a much larger 
percentage. 

Different kinds of soils vary in regard to their porosity, and the same 
soils vary to a very great degree in regard to their power of absorbing 
_ water, depending upon the amount of moisture already contained in 
* them. For example, on the red mesa land at South Pasadena, where 
the soil was practically dry, containing a little over one per cent of water 
when the water was turned on, it only absorbed one twentieth of the 
amount of water in a given time that was absorbed by soil of the same 
_ kind which contained at the beginning of the experiment about eight 
per cent of moisture. This may be an extreme case, but it is remark- 
-able how much water will run off from the soil when it is dry. We see 
: the same effect if we dip a dry feather in.water; when we pull it out it 
“comes out dry. But if we moisten it, and then dip it in water, it comes 
out saturated. It seems necessary, then, in order to have our land 
absorb the maximum amount of water in the minimum amount of 
time, that the soil should retain a goodly percentage of moisture. Or, 
in other words, if we wish to fill our mountains and soils with water 

and preserve the greatest amount of rainfall, they should be kept moist. 
_ Having shown that it is necessary to have some moisture in the soil 
in order to have it absorb the rainfall readily, and thus make our 


~ 


\ 


7129 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


mountains and arable lands reservoirs, let us look at the other! ade ot 
the case—that of retaining the moisture; and I regret to say that the 
experiments are not so complete and numerous as they should be, as 
they have only been fairly begun. . ae 
In the first place, let me call attention to the fact that captilany 4 | 
action in soil is in every direction from a given point. Water spreads — = 
out sidewise as well as upwards and downwards by this action. Soil — 
that was thoroughly irrigated was taken, and the amount of water — 
determined at 26.12 per cent. Some of this soil was put in beakers, 
filling them about half full, and placed in the laboratory. On the fol- — = 
_ lowing day, 66 per cent of fs moisture had dried out. Tin cans with- 
out either bottoms or tops were pressed down into the soil and the soil Be 
taken from the sides of the cans so that a slide could be passed under — | : 
them, thus cutting off connection with the earth beneath. It was found | 
that about the same amount of water had disappeared from these cans as 
had disappeared from the beakers. Where these cans had been mre 
some inches below the surface of the ground and the soil raked or culti- 
vated above them, there was practically little loss of moisture. Con- Bee 
clusions from these facts are very obvious: that in order to make ae 
reservoirs of our mountains and arable lands it is necessary to keep __ 
them in such a condition that they will readily absorb water and retain 
it, and this result can be brought about only by keeping them covered _ 
with the product of growth, or in other words, with forests, as these 
forests and their products make a covering or mulch for retaining — s 
moisture. And the same reasoning pertains to our cultivated lands: 
that in order to retain the moisture we must keep them well cultivated: 
It is a pity that there is no uniform unit of measure upon the metric fs : 
system for stating a definite amount of water. 2 
We are at present compelled to use the arbitrary and oftentimes puz- 
zling term of acre foot or inch, second foot, weir inch, and miner’s inch. — 
An acre foot of water is the amount of water that will cover an acre of 
ground one foot in depth. A second foot is a cubic foot of water per 
second. A miner’s inch of water is the amount of water that will flow 
through an inch square hole in an inch board under a pressure of four 
inches in twenty-four hours; such an amount of water has been deter- f 2 
mined legally to be 12,960 pallnae: 
I would venture to suggest that the miner’s inch, having been legally 
established to be a definite amount of water, be used as the universal — 
unit of measure in irrigation matters, and the following table, based 
upon the French decimal or metric system, be used in conjunction — - 
therewith; the Greek prefixes being used to denote the multiples ee 
the Latin ‘preties the fractional parts of the unit: . 


er ae 


~ 


-TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 123 


The Greek prefix Deka to mean 10 units. 


Cl (a3 66 Hecto t¢ (a4 100 a4 

6 6c 6 Kilo ¢¢ cé : 1,000 té 

é¢ cc (a4 Myria ¢ ts 10,000 $6 

eS aiaies POS Deets tea ct dy of a unit. 
“A / é (74 $6 Centi ¢¢ 6 oT SRST 4 (a9 
= 6c : tc ce Milli oé a4 i000 COE 6 


Proposed Table for the Measurement of Irrigation Water. 


1 Myra-inch =  10-Kilo-inches = - 10,000 inches. 
1 Kilo-inch = 10 Hecto-inches += __ 1,000 co 
_1Hecto-inch = 10 Deka-inches = 100 OF 
1 Deka-inch == 10 inches = 10 ES 
1 Inch — 10 Deci-inches a 1 inch 
~ 1 Deci-inch ==.’ 10) Centi-inches -- =. ,#, GG 
e 1 Centi-inch = 10 Milli-inches a Boas ee 
1 Milli-inch = too CCS 


; . Table of Equivalents. 


“1 Myria-inch 129,600,000 — gals. 


1 Kilo-inch = 12,960,000 es 
1 Hecto-inch = 1,296,000 Ke 
1 Deka-inch —= 129,600 BE 
1 Inch == ADQEQGO: 8 eects 
1 Deci-inch — 1,296 us 
1 Centi-inch — 129.60: £5 

= LZ 9G eM 


1 Milli-inch 


Water is contained in the soil i 
1. Hydroscopic water; 
2. Capillary water; and, 
&. Water of percolation. _ 
Hydroscopic water is that which is not perceptible to the senses, but 
igs appreciated by a gain or loss of weight in the soil which acquires or 
is deprived of it. 
Capillary water is that which is held in the fine pores of the soil by 
the surface attraction of its particles. 
Water of percolation is that which fills the interstices in the soil and 
would percolate through or filter out from the soil. 

An acre of ground contains 48,560 square feet. Allowing 100 pounds 
per cubic foot of dry soil, we would have 4,356,000 pounds every foot in 
depth. Let us make a reasonable assumption as to the reservoir capacity 

of our soils. They will hold as hydroscopic and capillary water about 
20 per cent of their weight. Assuming that our soils are only wet to a 
depth of ten feet in the rainy season, we would have 8,712,000 pounds 
of water stored in each acre of ground, or more than ten times the 
amount of water necessary to raise 20,000 pounds of oranges per acre, 
if all the water was available, which it is not. 
Professor King has estimated that it takes to raise different crops, 
_ such ag hay, barley, clover, etc., from 300 to 500 tons of water to make 


three different states, as— 


= 
Pp 


124 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ee he - 


one ton of dry matter. My ‘inosine lead me to think that it nies 
much less to raise fruit—about 200 tons of water to raise one ton . 
of oranges or lemons. Now, allowing 20,000 pounds of fruit per acre, — 
let us see how far one inch of water would take us. Oranges contain 1 in 
round numbers 18 per cent of solid matter and 82 per cent of water; 
therefore, 20,000 pounds of fruit would contain 3,600 pounds of dry 
matter. If we multiply this factor by 200, the irene of pounds of 
water it takes to raise one pound of dry fruit, and, with this result, 
namely, 720,000, divide the total number of pounds in an annual inch ~~ 
of water, we would get 54.5, which would represent the number of acres ~ 
of oranges producing 20,000 pounds of fruit per acre, that one inch per- 
petual flow would supply, making no allowance for water put into a wg 
ground by winter rains. . . 


Surface Irrigation.—There are four systems of surface irrigation in. _ 
general use in Southern California. The first method isa basin method, ~_ 
where they cover the whole of the ground. A double furrow runs down | 
between every other row of trees, the furrow being large enough to carry ae 
from 15 to 50 inches of water. Let us trace this stream starting from 
the head ditch: The attendant breaks down the furrow enough to let 
all the stream flow into the first basin, requiring from one to three 
minutes to fill it, according to the size of the stream and basin. Hvery 
other tree is irrigated until the last tree is reached, when the attendant — 
works back, irrigating the trees he omitted on his downavard course; thus, — 
when the last tree is irrigated in both rows, the attendant is back at the 
head ditch, where he can turn the stream between other rows without — 
loss of time. The cost of making these basins is variously estimated 
from $1.50 to $2.50 per acre. 
The second method is also a basin method, the basins covering the ~ 
whole of the ground, but without furrows. The water is run into the 
first basin until it is filled; then a portion of the lower side is broken 
down and the water allowed to flow into the next basin;andsoondown ~ 
through the whole row. When the last basin is filled and while the 
water is still running, the attendant goes back to the head ditch and 
turns the water into the next row of basins. : 
The third method is where the basins are made only over a portion ~ 
‘of the ground, thus omitting to irrigate a part of the land. G 
The fourth method is called the ‘Modern Method.” It consists in 
having a head ditch at the highest side of the orchard and running the 
water down through small furrows to the lower end. The number of — 
furrows used varies from one to eight. It is an easy, convenient, and 
cheap method. ea 
Inasmuch as the roots of trees in an orchard form a perfect network 
through the whole soil, it is necessary to get an even distribution of the __ 
required amount of water over the whole of the land, 7. ¢., where surface __ 


5 > i 
- ~ = Py ae 
- ° are * . a oo 
i drag 
a < thee 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 125 


irrigation is resorted to. This certainly can be done by the basin 
method first above mentioned. This method, although perhaps the 
oldest in use, finds many objectors, who say it is impracticable, expen- 
_ sive, and even impossible in some instances. There are those who 
maintain that it washes the ground too much, and that where the 
ground is rolling and the basins have to be made small too much 
expense is incurred. The third method is to be condemned in every 
instance. For, as has been observed, the roots of trees form a perfect 
network throughout the soil and these roots are feeders. If, therefore, 


WAN 
WR 


WY 


Dh 


ih 12 
lie 


| 
Wy 


a 


SS 
B77 “ 
Ze = YA Ae 
S CME l 


Tor MopEern MEtTHOD—SURFACE [RRIGATION. 


the roots which have grown during the rainy season into the unirrigated 
portion are left without water and the soil becomes dry, they languish 
and die. The fourth method, called the “Modern Method,” should never 
be resorted to excepting where absolutely necessary, and then the head 
ditches should be very near together and the furrows small and 
numerous. This method is very easy, popular, and cheap, and what is 
-more the pity, many people are in the habit of so irrigating. 
The different methods seem to be persistently followed in different 
localities in the State. : 
Where surface irrigation is practiced and where the ground is kept cul- 
tivated to the depth of six inches, it follows from the premises that from 


ae) a 


126 _ OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


one half to two thirds of the water (allowing one miner’s inch continuous — 
flow to ten acres of ground) is wasted—for the portion of the water which - 
is soaked up by the cultivated ground is lost to the tree, because in the 
cultivation the moisture in the cultivated soil goes off into theair. To 
save this immense proportion of loss, it follows then as a natural : 
sequence that the water must be placed helen oe cultivated ground, a. e ce = 
sub-irrigation must be resorted to. . 


Sub-Irrigation has always given satisfactory results as to a proper —— 


distribution of water, but 
ticed has been unsatisfac 


this depression. Rev. C.F. 


the system heretofore prac- — 
tory from a practical and — 


Loop has such a system of 


economic standpoint, owing to the fact that the pipes __ 
have become broken or fill ed with roots,andclogged— 
no underground valve hav ing been invented that was a 
economical and at the same time tight and impervious ae 
toroots. Wehave tried and can recommend asanabso- _ 
lute and almost perfect sys tem of sub-irrigation, that 
an orchard be piped between each row with one inch i iron : : 
pipe at the depth of about eighteen inches from thes. 3 
surface, and that a hydrant be placed in the center of 
the square formed by four trees. This hydrant is a  ~ 
very cheap and simple de vice. It consists of noth- 
ing but a short piece of pipe with an extra number of 
threads on one end, say sev ' enoreight; there are two 
slots cut down through a portion of the threads; this — a 
pipe is screwed down into a tee in the main pipe. To 
start the flow of water, this pipe with slots in it is par- — £3 
tially unscrewed, which per - mits the water to run out __ 
through the slots. Any thing that would grow 
through the slots is effect ively cut off when the water __ 
is turned off by screwing down the pipe. A depres- 
sion about four inches deep and three inches in diame- — = 
ter is left around each hy =|drant, and the water is -. 
turned on sufficiently when = it appears at the bottom of 


sub-irrigation at Claremont, except that the valves are much more expen- < 
sive, costing about 35 cents each. Dr. Loop says that the system has 
given him perfect satisfaction, and he is of the opinion that he does not a hie: 
use half the amount of water that he formerly used, and that he saves eee 
more than half the expense ordinarily incurred in cultivation, etc. ie 
Other systems have been invented, and some patented, but all, so far 
as known to the writer, have proved failures. From the best information — e 
that can be gathered, all cement systems have proved failures; although, - = ax 
when first put in use, they did the work designed for them with satis-_ 
faction. Cement pipes have not proved a success, owing to the fact 2 


7 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 12% 


that they break and become leaky, necessitating constant repairs. And 
they also become filled with roots. Experiments with cement pipes 


— were begun in California about twenty-five years ago, and have con- 


tinued to the present time, and yet the writer does not know of a single 
orchard, nor can he get any trace of one, that is being irrigated now by 


such a system that has been in existence five years. 


Mr. James Campbell, of Pasadena, tried a system of sub-irrigation 
on two and one half acres of orange orchard, some twelve or fifteen 
years ago, with three-inch continuous cement pipes laid twenty inches 
deep. He says the system worked with perfect satisfaction for three or 


four years, which was as long as the pipe kept in good order. He does 
: é : 


Yjjf)y,§ YY 
Vig 


LMM EV LA SL 


We “Cl MWA 


Sus-IRRIGATION. 


not think that he used one third the amount of water that he did by 
surface irrigation. Indeed, he could not have used as much as one 
third, for he states that the reservoir from which he irrigated his two 
and one half acres contained but 10,000 gallons of water, which would 
only be at the rate of 4,000 gallons per acre per irrigation; allowing 
two irrigations per month, it would only be 8,000 gallons per acre, or 
equivalent to one miner’s inch continuous flow to about 48 acres. He 
also says that the labor for cultivation was much less than in orchards 
irrigated by the surface method. 
_ There are several patented systems, which require the underground 
discharge to be surrounded with coarse stones or gravel, or both, and 
even with cement flagging under the outlet; but all these only increase 
_ labor and expense without any corresponding good to be gained thereby. 
_ Elaborate tests in actual practice have shown that the water will seep 


128 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


out in the same length of time to a radius of ten feet from a valve 


buried in the ground, or from a mere post hole three inches in diameter, ie 


or from a hole that is one foot in diameter, or from a hole that is two 


feet in diameter. This may seem a strange statement, yet if we will — 7 
consider that the area of a circle 20 feet in diameter is 314 square feet, — : 
and that by making a hole 2 feét in diameter we would only take away _ 


3.14 feet, or about one per cent of the soil within the larger circle, it is 


apparent that little is saved in point of time by making a large hole to © | 


be filled up with extraneous and perhaps expensive material. 


As the cost of such a system as is recommended above would be about e 
$100 per acre, it still puts the system beyond the reach of most of the "= 
ranchers, although the annual saving would be about 15 per cent on 


“this investment in labor, etc., without any reference to saving the water. — ‘ 


It is also impracticable ner the water is distributed in open ditches, 


as it requires some little pressure in order to distribute the water 


through an inch pipe. Other means less expensive were therefore tried, 
one of which has been quite successful. This system is called — | 


Inter-Irrigation.—lIt consists in distributing the water above sce 
but in disseminating it below the surface. This is done by means of 
holes the width of an ordinary shovel dug to the depth of from 10 to 24 
inches, according to the nature of the soil, in the center of each square 


formed by four trees. On ground that is level or nearly so, a single ~ 


furrow is run down a little to the side of these holes; a furrow at right — 


angles to that furrow is dug to the hole, and the water is allowed torun _ 


in and fill up the hole, which is kept full during the period of irriga- 
tion. The water then passes on down the furrow and into the next 
hole, and so on to the last hole in the orchard. Where the water can 


be run diagonally through.an orchard, or if the orchard is set quincunx, ~ : 
there need be but one furrow in every other row. Where the ground is. 


rolling, or on side hills, it will be necessary to have wooden or other 
troughs or a system of movable pipes to keep the ground from washing, 
and it is always best to have troughs or pipes. The troughs in use at 
Lenapuente are made from wooden strips 1x2 nailed on strips 1x8, 
making a V-shaped trough. No joints are required, as a single length 


is run from hole to hole. The cost of such troughs is about $18 per 
acre where they run on the squares, or $12 per acre where they arerun 


every other row diagonally. The pipe used at Lenapuente, where the 
water is delivered under pressure, is oné-half inch iron, with a valve, 


such as is above described, over each hole. The pipes are connected and 


disconnected by means of a Wilgus union. Both troughs and ela? 
can be easily transferred from one portion of an orchard to another. | 
As to the objections to the system, there are apparently but two. 


The first and most important objection is the difficulty of getting ‘4. 2 


sufficiently long run of water to be able to irrigate in this manner; for _ 


Ae 


CE eae 
Se ren 

dl ea Ae 

4; 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 129 


it takes from two to four times as long, according to the nature of the 


soil, to irrigate by it. We think this objection would in practice amount 
to little or nothing, if a community should adopt the system. If the 
existence of an orchard depends upon it, or the successful maturing of a 
crop, we apprehend that arrangements could be made for giving the 
individual rancher his water in from two to four times the length of 
run, cutting him down in quantity correspondingly. 

It has been ascertained that soils differ in regard to their porosity 
and, consequently, in their absorbing power. ‘The extremes seem to be, 
in different soils, that a single hole will soak away from 2 to 15 gallons 
of water per hour, this largely depending upon the amount of moisture 


that there is in a soil—a perfectly dry soil requiring much more time 


than the soil containing six to eight per cent of moisture. This must 


INTER-[RRIGATION. 


be determined by each rancher for himself. It is done by placing: a 
barrel containing a known quantity of water, on the ground at the side 
of the hole, with the faucet over it; allowing the hole to’be filled with 
water from the faucet to the desired height, regulating the flow so that 
the water will stand at this height in the hole. Assume that you desire 


to soak away 389 gallons in this hole (the equivalent of one miner’s 


inch continuous flow to ten acres where there are one hundred trees per 
acre), and that it took 38.9 hours to soak away the 889 gallons; this 
would be at the rate of ten gallons per hour. One would then know 
that such irrigation must continue by this system for 38.9 hours in 
order to get what would be equivalent to one miner’s inch continuous 
flow to ten acres. | : 
And the second objection is, the trouble of cultivation where there are 
troughs and holes through an orchard. But if the troughs are set deep 
I—BH 


130 


enough, there is little objection on this score. 
no objection. It must be remembered that not one- -half the olhvatene 
is necessary as in the other system. Besides, there i is nothing good L 
this world without its corresponding evil. eae 
It has been found that orange trees that are twenty years old and 
upwards, which were wilted, were revived by the application of two 
hundred gallons of water per tree in this way, and remained in a fresh 
condition for over thirty days. How much less might have anewerels 
the purpose will be determined in the future by actual measurement. : 
The system of sub-irrigation or inter-irrigation is especially adapted 
to small flower-beds and garden purposes generally. 


Recess till 2:30 o’clock p. x. | : ake as eae 


AFTERNOON SESSION—FOURTH DAY. 


Fripay, December 15, 1899. 


At 2:30 o’clock the convention reassembled. President Cooprr in the 
chair. 


REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON MR. ADAMS’ REPORT. 


Wm. Jounston, Epw. Berwick, and Witt A. Counter, as the com- __ 
mittee to which was referred the report of Edward F. Adams on the 
proposed free public market in San Francisco, submitted the following __ 
report: . : uee 


+ 


Your committee, from the data at hand and from information secured on such short — 
notice, believe that the establishment and maintenance of a free public marketinSan 
Francisco, regulated and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Act of the 
Legislature of California for that purpose, will be of great benefit, not only to the pro-— 
ducers of the products to be sold, but to the citizens of San Francisco who are the 
purchasers of such products. eo 

Your committee is advised and believe that the provisions of the law providing for 
said free public market haye been ignored, or feebly and ineffectually carried out, by — 
the officials charged with that duty, either through apathy and indifference, or some _ 
claimed defect in the law, or some reasons or motives unknown to your committee. ha 

Your committee therefore report and recommend the adoption by this convention — 
of the following resolutions: ia : 

Resolved, That the establishment of a free public market in the city of San Francisco, . Poke: BS 
under the terms of the lawepassed for that purpose, is a duty imposed, not only by ~ pies 
legislative enactment, but by the interests of thousands of producers throughout the - 
State and of thousands of consumers within that city. ¢ a 


-_- PWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. ok 


Resolved, That the Board of State Harbor Commissioners be appealed to to carry out 
_ the provisions of the law, and if in their judgment further legislation is necessary, 
that they recommend such additional enactments as will enable them to speedily and 


: _ effectually establish such a free public market as the producers and shippers desire. 


Report and resolutions adopted. 


SELECTION OF THE NEXT MEETING PLACE. 


Presipent COOPER. We will now take up the selection of the next 
meeting place of this convention. You will understand that these con- 
ventions are held for the benefit of the fruit-growers throughout the 
entire State and are not local organizations. They are held under the 
auspices of the California State Board of Horticulture, and it is the 
desire of the State Board that the people of the State shall make requests 
where these meetings shall be held. It is not a local affair, and the 
meetings ought to be held in the central, the middle, the northern, and 
_ the southern parts of the State. That is to the pleasure of the fruit- 
growers of the State. This being the central part of the State, it was 
held at San José. The last one was held in the southern part of the 


_ State north of the Tehachapi. The next one ought to be held in the 


northern part of the State, their needs being equally great in that 
section. I will say that the motion or request must be to the State 
Board of Horticulture to hold a convention at any certain point, as the 
Board claims the right to change the place if the conditions and circum- 
stances are such that it will make it necessary to choose some other 
place. 

Mr. HUTCHINS, or Marysvititz. Mr. Chairman and Gentlemen of 
the Convention: I desire to place in nomination for that distinguished 
-honor—for I do think it is an honor to any city to be chosen as a meet- 
ing place for such a body as this—the City of Marysville. 

Mr. SWEEHTSER, or Santa Rosa. Mr. President: It affords me 
much pleasure to nominate the “City of Roses”’—Santa Rosa. 

On a vote being taken, Marysville was selected. 


ACCOUNT OF WORK OF THE BLASTOPHAGA, OR CAPRI FIG 
INSECT, IN FERTILIZING THE SMYRNA FIG. 


Essay By GEORGE C. ROEDING, or Fresno. 


California has established such a worldwide reputation as a producer 
of high-grade fruit, both green and dried; our fruits have come into 
such active and successful competition with similar varieties grown and 
imported from Europe, that it seems strange indeed that, with the well- 
known activity, energy, intelligence, and persistency displayed by 
growers in dealing with horticultural problems, we have not succeeded 


132 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


in placing on the market, long before this, a fig as palatable and 


delicious as the imported Smyrna fig is known to be. 


Importations of cuttings and trees have been made by various Cali- _ E 


fornia parties for the past twenty years, but the most of those who were ~ 
interested in the matter, failing to succeed, attributed their lack of 


success to the climate, and ceased ‘to epee or investigate the 
matter any further. 
In 1886 Mr. Frederick Roeding, proprietor of the Fancher. Creek 


Nursery, having become convinced that the White Adriatic fig was a 
far inferior fruit to the imported article, decided to send one of his men 
to Smyrna to investigate the matter and at the same time bring home 


cuttings of figs and other fruits adapted to this climate. 
The difficulties in obtaining information and securing cuttings were 


many, but after a journey of seven months, the cuttings reached 


Fresno in June, 1887. The cuttings consisted of 15,000 figs, as well as : ~ 
several thousand cuttings of olives, pomegranates, etc. They were 


packed in moist sawdust and were found to be in excellent condition 
on arrival, but owing to the lateness of the season only a small percent- 
age grew. 


The following year the first orchard of twenty acres, consisting of 


forty Capri figs and the balance Smyrna figs, with the exception of 


some seventy-five Smyrna table figs divided into three varieties, was 


planted by the Fancher Creek Nursery. In 1889, twenty acres more, 
and in 1891 an additional twenty acres were planted. 


The final planting was made on the strength of my having succeeded 


in producing figs by artificial pollination. Becoming satisfied that I 


had the genuine fig of commerce, I did not hesitate to increase my acre- — 
age, for having the Capri fig and the Smyrna fig, I anticipated no diffi- — 


culty in introducing and establishing the fig insect, “Blastophaga.” 
The first Smyrna figs grown in the United States were produced in 
1890 on the Fancher Creek Nursery, the pollen having been taken from 
the June crop of Capris and introduced into the Smyrna fig by means 
of a toothpick.. As a result of this artificial fertilization I produced 
four figs, and in 1891 one hundred and fifty fruits by using a glass tube 
drawn very fine at one end to introduce the pollen. After gathering a 
. little of this pollen in the end of the tube, I inserted it into the orifice 
of the fig and then blew into it. This method was a great improve- 
ment over the old one. Samples of the dried fruits were sent to a 


number of prominent fruit-growers, and among them, Mr. B. M. Lelong. — 


The following is a copy of his letter to me: 


San Francisco, October 4, 1891. 
I have yery carefully examined the Smyrna figs which you left and which were artifi- 
cially caprified by you. I desire to congratulate you upon haying produced the first fig 


containing seed of fertile kernel. I have also carefully compared them with other figs, © 
such as the White Adriatic, and even with the imported, and I find these to be of superior 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 133 


flayor and very meaty. I think that in your experiments you have struck the keynote 
to success, as to-day our best dried figs do not come up to the standard in quality, for 
the reason that as yet we have not the true variety as grown inSmyrna. By that I 
mean to say that the true Smyrna fig has not yet borne fruit like that borne in its own 
country. The conditions, cf course, will be understood as they are being looked into. 

That you have made a success in fertilizing the fruit of the Smyrna fig cannot be 
doubted, as the seeds were as fertile as those from Smyrna. 


All figs fertilized in the manner described remained on the trees, and 
a week after they had been pollinated a marked difference could be 
discerned between them and the unpollinated fruits. The former com- 
menced to develop and fill out and assumed a fresh, deep green color, 
while the latter turned a dull yellowish green, showed their ribs very 
distinctly, and when about three quarters of an inch in diameter, 
dropped from the trees. 

The results of the artificial pollination proved conclusively to my 
tind that the Capri fig and Blastophaga were necessary for the success- 
ful production of the Smyrna fig; and having convinced myself that I — 
_had the genuine Smyrna fig as well as the Capri trees, my next step was 

to introduce the Blastophaga, in which I anticipated no great difficulty. 
That my optimistic expectations were not to be realized as quickly as I 
thought, the following will show. 

In the year 1892 several consignments of figs containing insects were 
received from Smyrna, most of which were in good condition. On cut- 
ting the figs open hundreds of insects emerged, flying around in a large 
Mason jar in which I had placed the fruit, and these insects were after- 
ward transferred to a covered tree. 

In 1893 a gentleman was sent to New Mexico and Arizona in search 
of Capri figs, it having been reported to us that the trees grew in certain 
localities there, but he found neither trees nor insects. 

In the seasons of 1894 and 1895 several consignments were again 
received from Smyrna, one being received in the latter part of March— 
and it was through this shipment that I first drew my conclusions as 
‘to where the insect hibernated during the winter months, a matter on 
which I could never get any information, entomologists, as well as all 
writers on the subject, evidently being in the dark. Knowing that the 
Ficus carica was a deciduous tree, I concluded that the figs received 
must have been carried over on the tree during the winter months, and 
following out these deductions I planted in 1894 a number of Capri 
trees in a very much protected place in the foothills about twenty miles. 
east of Fresno. In the winter of 1897-98 one of the Capri trees carried 
a number of figs through the winter, which strengthened my belief 
that it was in the fig that the insect hibernated. 

In 1896 I received a number of consignments of Capri figs from 
Mexico, and in 1897 J again attempted to introduce the insect from that 
locality. Mr. Koebele, then in the employ of the Hawaiian Govern- 


oo 


194-": OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


ment, kindly volunteered to render me every assistance in his power — a 
to bring the matter to a successful issue. He also sent me a number of « s 
Capri figs containing insects, but with his, as well as with Lo SS 
shipments received, I failed to establish the insect. | aaa 

Mr. Koebele, in his correspondence with me, finally stated that hesce 
was well satisfied that each variety of ficus had its own species of Blas- 
tophaga, and in his opinion if I wished to succeed it would be ne = soe 
to import the insect from the locality from which my Capri fig trees f 
had been sent. ; = 

The Division of Entomology of the United States Department of = 
Agriculture had been fully cognizant of the importance of this matter e 
for a number of years, but no active steps were taken by it until aletter 


from the California State Board of Trade, to the Hon. James Wilson, = 


requesting his assistance, was written. This letter was referred to Dr. 
L. O. Howard, Chief of the Division of Entomology, who at once — es 
himself in communication with Mr. Walter T. Swingle, a member of 
the Division of Botany, who was then traveling in Europe. 2 E ms 
Mr. Swingle had made some investigations into the matter of caprifi- _ fe 
cation on his own account before he received any communication from __ 
Dr. Howard, and the first consignments, sent by him in 1898, were 
practically ee at his own expense. 
The first shipment was received April 15, 1898, and I made the fol- 


lowing note at the time: “ Received first Capris wrapped in tinfoil and | 


packed in cotton. Hundreds of insects emerged, but all died he 
following day.” 

Other shipments were received early in May, but not in s good 
condition as the first. None of the insects, however, from any of the 
shipments, established themselves. a 

Figs packed in tinfoil in 1898 arrived in such good condition that all 
the consignments sent in 1899 were packed in this manner, the first 
shipment of forty figs, arriving April 6th. The fruits received were cut : 
open, placed in fruit jars, and then hung in a Capri fig tree growing 
in the orchard, the same having been previously prepared for the insects 
by covering with sheeting. Five other shipments were received between _ 
the date named and April 15th, the Breuer part of the fruits being __ 
handled in the manner described. ae: 

I had made so many failures in attempting to introduce the insect in a 
previous years in-this manner, that I had very little confidence in the — 
success of this venture, and the following is an extract from my letter 
to Dr. Howard: | ae 

T will cut the figs open and place them under the wild fig tree, which I have covered, : = 
but I anticipate no results, and I do not think a success will be made in this matter = 
until fig trees, with the figs on the branches, are sent out here during the winter months. 
If this is done the insects will have a chance to develop in a natural way, and, being full 


of vitality, will enter our wild figs here just as they do in their eee PPESOS from — 
one crop of Capris to another. cs 


aor itty 8 > 
es 5 pete 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 135 


~ Imagine my surprise when one of my employés, who was engaged in 
artificially pollinating Smyrna figs with a glass blowpipe, toward the 
latter part of June, 1899, brought me a Capri fig which he thought con- 
tained seeds, but which, on examination, I found were galls. I immedi- 
ately made an examination of the tented tree and ‘also of another Capri 


_ fig adjoining it, and discovered that the two trees had about forty fruits 


containing insects. The insects had no doubt gone into the figs on the 
tree adjoining the tented one, having passed through some of the open- 
ings of the cloth cover. 

The figs under the tented tree came to maturity first, on account of 
the higher temperature developed, and on examining the figs taken 
from this tree I could find but yery few female insects. All that 
remained were the males, and these au be found in large numbers 
inside of each fig. 

On June 29th, six days later than the figs matured under the tented 
tree, those on the adjoining tree came to maturity, and I picked several 
of the fruits and took them to the foothill place, but unfortunately 
found no figs there. | 

To show the wonderful powers of penetration- possessed by these 
insects: The jar containing the insects had been covered with two 
thicknesses of cheese cloth, but this did not retard them from forcing 
their way through, and upon arriving at my destination I found a 
number of the insects crawling around on the outside of the jar. The 
following day I picked the remainder of the Capri figs, and hung them, 


- 


_ two on each end of a string of raffia, in several of my Capri fig trees in 


another part of my orchard. These trees at that time had a number of 
figs, none of which were larger than two peas, and on account of the 
size of the fruits I had grave doubts as to the capability of the insects 
to enter them. 

On July 19th I made a baietal examination of the Capri fig trees in 


which I had hung the June crop of Capri fruits, and found a number of 
- figs which were of a dark green color and plump and hard when I 


pressed them between the fingers—an indication that they contained 
something; the change in the appearance of the fruits in the Capri 


_ trees being the same as in the Smyrna figs when artificially pollinated. 


On August 12th the first fig matured on one of the Capri trees 


: referred to above, and on examination I found it contained pulp, a few 
galls (which upon examination were found to be females), and also 
seeds. This was a great disappointment to me, and, as I wrote Dr. 


Howard at the time, I was convinced that if a the figs then develop- 
ing on the trees should prove to be like the first one, a new and difficult 
problem had arisen and I feared the insect would be lost. 

Between the 20th and 26th of August ten more Capri figs came to 


maturity. These were entirely unlike the first one which matured on 


: ae this tree, having no pulp, and resembled very closely the June crop of 


136 - OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


Capri figs, with the exception that the staminate flowers were absent. 
At this time a new crop of Capri fruits had made its oppea=as and 
the insects entered them. - 


Just as before, pulpy figs were the first to mature on this the third _ 
crop, and from October 15th to November 10th nothing but Capri fruits 


of this character were to be found. 

On the last date named and during the visit of Mr. Walter T. Swingle 
for the purpose of investigating the workings of the fig insect, thousands 
of insects were found to be emerging from Capri fruits, and these 
were unlike the first figs of this crop—without pulp. 

As far as is known none of the writers on this rather intricate sub-— 
ject have described more than three generations of the Blastophaga. 
California, however, with her salubrious climate, has brought out a new 
phase in this matter, which up to this writing was unknown, for instead 
of three generations, there are four. 

That the Capri fig will also produce fruits which, althouss insipid, 
are edible, is a feature well worth mentioning. 

In November, when Mr. Swingle made a careful examination of the 


Capri trees, many young figs were found, and on closely examining the ~ 


ostium of many of the figs the gauzy-like wings of the insect could be 
found adhering to the bracts on the outside—an indication that the 
insect had forced its way in, although to the naked eye, and even with 
a powerful magnifying glass, there was apparently no opening for it to 
enter. 

To protect the figs remaining on a few of the trees, and which will- 


not grow any more now, I have built a cloth house, 28 feet wide by 75 — 


feet long and 16 feet high, inclosed in which are three trees, having 
fully one thousand fruits, which I hope to carry through the winter. 

Unfortunately the tree in the foothills which had fruited so prolificly — 
in the past failed to form any winter figs, and it is for this reason that 
such elaborate preparations were necessary to care for the fruits on the 
plains. Hundreds of the fruits are still to be found on the outside 
trees, and if the fruits carry through without any injury, it will give 
ample opportunity to ASP Ena how much frost the Capri figs will 

stand. 

The future of the Smyrna fig business hinges on the successful carry- 
ing through of the figs this winter. 

Only a limited number of the Smyrna figs developed as a result of ~ 
the flowers being pollinated by the insect, and these grew on Smyrna 
fig trees growing within seventy-five feet of the covered tree and the one 
close to it. 

The important point held in view above all others during that pe 
season was to perpetuate the insect and not to produce figs, and this is’ 
the reason that none of the Capri figs were hung in the Smyrna fig trees. 


The propagation of the fig wasp takes place in the following manner: 


= 
¥. 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 137 


The female wasp forces its way, with the loss of its wings, into the fruit 
of the Capri fig through the eye, and lays its eggs in the ovaries of the 
gall flowers. Inconsequence of this puncture, the wasp embryo develops 
in the ovaries of the flowers. The wingless or male wasps are the first 
to appear. They gnaw their way into the ovaries in which the females 
lie, impregnate them, and then perish within the fig in which they were 
born. The winged female then escapes and enters the following crop of 
the Capri fig, when the same process as described above takes place. 
Or, if the fruits have been hung in the Smyrna fig trees, as is done with 
the June crop, the wasp forces its way through the eye of this, the 
edible fig, which is then in the proper state of maturity to admit its 
entrance, and in its endeavor to lay its eggs, and laden with pollen 
obtained in its outward passage from the Capri fig, fertilizes the female 
flowers of the former and then perishes, leaving no offspring; the con- 
struction of the female flowers being such that the insect is prevented 
from depositing its eggs. 

All figs fertilized in the manner described mature good, edible fruit, 
full of perfect seeds; while those which are not pollinated, fail to develop, 
dry up, and fall from the tree when about one-third grown. 

The general impression prevails that the wild, or Capri, fig is really 
the male fig, while the Smyrna, or edible, fig is the female. While the 
two varieties of figs do ostensibly stand in the relation of male and 
female to each other, it must not be inferred from this that the wild fig 
produces nothing but male flowers, for it contains male, gall, and female 
flowers, the number varying in a more or less degree in the different 
crops of Capri figs. It is only in the June crop, however, that the male 
or staminate flowers are to be found to any extent, and it is this crop 
that plays such an important part in the successful production of the 
Smyrna fig, the flowers of which are all pistillate or female. 

The fruit known as a fig is really a hollow inflorescence, the flowers 
being grouped around a common receptacle. 

I have shown by my experiments that it is not necessary to have sev- 
eral varieties of Capri figs in order that the insect may breed, but that 
one tree is sufficient for all the generations of the insect, providing it 
will produce a succession of crops in the future as it has done in the 
season past. 

In my opinion, however, it is important that we should have a num- 
_ ber of varieties of Capri figs planted in different parts of the State, so 
that if one variety or even a number of varieties fail to produce fruits 
in one locality, the insects could be obtained elsewhere when needed. 

The conclusions arrived at from the experiments made thus far are, 
that the Smyrna fig cannot be successfully grown unless through the 
agency of the Capri fig and the Blastophaga, and my orchard of sixty- 
acres of this variety from eight to twelve years old is, I think, a living 
example of this statement. 


138 _ OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 


REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE PRESIDENT’S 
ADDRESS. Reese, See 


JUDGE J. R. Lewis, W. P. Cracin, and H. P. SraBLER, the committee oe 
to which was referred the annual address of President Cooper, sub- 


mitted the following report: Sie 
' re José, December 15, 1399. arf as 


To the President and Members of the State Fruit-Growers’ Convention : 


GENTLEMEN: Your committee, to whom was referred the President’s address, haye en. 
had the same under consideration and beg leave to submit their report. Ba diye 

So much of the address as relates to the question of fruit distribution is of vital in- a8 
terest to the growers throughout the State, and merits the most careful consideration aes. 
of the convention. Matters have, since the address was read, been incidentally discussed _ 
before the convention, and we recommend that so much of the address as relates to 7h 
subject be referred to the standing committee on marketing. Se 

The question as to insect pests and investigation touching predacious insects and ng 
parasites, so ably diseussed in the address, is one of great interest to the fruit-growers of — ae 
the State, and should receive earnest consideration and intelligent action onthe part of —_— 
this convention. The work of the State Board of Horticulture in the suppression of 
insect pests is especially commended to the attention of California fruit-growers. Pro- — 
ducers of no other State in the Union, or of no other country in the world, haye made 
the progress in the destruction of these pests that the State of California has made. 

The appropriations suggested on the part of our State Legislature should be urged, 
not only by this convention, but by all local societies organized in behalf of the fruit- — 
growers throughout the State. 

Regarding food adulteration, we would recommend that this question, than which — 
there can be none more important, be referred to the Legislative Committee to devise a 
plan so that the influence of the fruit-growers of this State may be wisely directed and — 
“made effective. 

Your committee desires to emphasize the epee es of the ie Ae: recommend- 
ation that Congress be urged to adopt prompt measures looking to the preceaae ores 
our forests and the protection of our watersheds. ie 

The committee heartily concur in the closing recommendation as suggested by the 
President, and, in conformity therewith, offer the following resolution: 

‘* Resolved, That our members in Congress be requested to present an Act, and tabee 
for its adoption, setting aside from settlement for homes all mountain lands unoccupied 
in the State of pation: and restrict the devastation caused by prospecting for minerals 
and mining purposes.’ . 


Pror. CHILDS. I move that the report be received and the recom- 


mendations adopted. . | ee 
Motion carried unanimously. . ee 
ig 

DISCUSSION ON IRRIGATION. SS 

Mr. BERWICK. Dr. Woodbridge spoke of the leaching of soils by 


ae 
, SARS 


the use of a few inches of water. This is an important question forus 


to know. I would like to have the subject discussed further. 3 = a 
Proressor WOODBRIDGE. There are so many here with practical 
experience that you had better ask some one from an irrigation district. Bee 
B. E. HUTCHINGS, of Fresno. In regard to the leaching of theland 
by irrigation: If that was a fact all of the country where I come from co 


a, 


TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS’ CONVENTION. 139 


would be entirely worthless by this time. We irrigate very heavily and 


we have not had any trouble so far as that is concerned. I think that 
~ some of the largest.crops that were ever raised were raised this year 
and others upon land that was not only irrigated, but flooded every 
year for the last sixteen or seventeen years, and several times a year at 


that. Water is rising rapidly, though, on account of the irrigation, and 


_is getting too near the roots of our trees and vines in many places. We 
_ have got to put in tiles in those places. I will say that it is a very small 


portion of the country that is irrigated in that way. 

Dr. SHERMAN. In the district north of Merced there has been 
considerable complaint on account of land growing poorer every year on 
account of irrigation. It s a sandy soil, and the richer portion of the 


- sand seems to percolate totally, and the land seems to be becoming 
poorer and poorer every year. Hven though it has been fertilized, they 
claim that it continues to decrease in usefulness. The land I speak of 


is used mainly for sweet potatoes. 
Mr. BERWICK. Are the sweet potato crops continuous with no 
rotation? If so, wouldn’t that account for the poorness of the land. 


2 Dr. SHERMAN. They raise sweet potatoes only. 


= PEACH-BORERS. 


Dr. SHERMAN. I would like to know if there has been anything 
said about the peach-borer—about the treatment of it, and whether it is 
proper to leave the holes open during the winter season or to cover them 
up again after being exposed in digging af. 1 bore? 

EH. M. EHRHORN. This county (Santa Clara) has had a great deal | 
of varying experience with the peach-borer. We have tried all kinds of 
preventives, and the only remedy which has ever been tried with prom- 
ise of success is the carbon ‘bisulphide. However, there is a difference 
of opinion in regard to it, as some damage has been done, and also 
some success has been attained. The damage has been invariably 
found to be where the liquid has been placed on the bark of the tree and 


onthe roots. Where the liquid has not been applied directly to the bark 


success has been attained, although at times it has been a failure. The 
failures we cannot account for; my opinion is that it is owing to the 
liquid itself. We find in some liquids that the carbon will not kill the 
insect, and in others that it will. We also find that where the carbon 
has failed to kill the insect, a can of the same stuff purchased by 


another party will kill it. I believe there is a difference in the strength 


of it. If we ever get hold of another can where it fails to kill the 
peach-borer, we will have it analyzed and find where the trouble lies. I 
believe the carbon should be applied when the soil is sufficiently moist 


Z _ to crumble in your hand. If it is too wet the carbon will perco- 


140 OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE) 


late through it and go to the tree. The soil should be loosened around ~ 


the tree so that the fumes can get to the insect. If the soil is packed, 


it takes quite awhile for the fumes to go to the insect, and the strength 


of it is lost. I have seen trees where the soil has been removed 


- 


in the wet season and the water would gather around thosetrees. Ifthe — i 
weather is hot, it is not good to have the sun beating on the water — 


and scorching the bark. My advice is not to remove the soil from 


the tree for any length of time. I have been asked several times about a 
whitewashing the trunks of the trees, putting on a thick coat. It is 


useless, so far as I know, to put whitewash on the trees at this time of 


the year, especially where you have to take the borer out with your 


knife. My study of the insect has been this: I have found the moth 


flying from the first of April to the end of October, illustrating to us _ 


that during the whole period we have had quite a continuous brood. 
We all know from experience that we find in the same tree different 
sizes of larve, from a quarter to a half, and even one inch in length, as 
long as the brood lasts—between the first of April and the end of 
October. By digging out the borer at this time of the year, you need 
not have any fear of the reappearance of the borer until after the first 


of April. The moths of those borers which are still in the trees at this 


time, will appear in April and fly about and lay their eggs on the trunks 


of the trees, and these eggs will hatch a new brood the next year. One 


can apply the preventive in April or the latter part of March when the __ 


heavy storms are over. Closely watch the substance, especially if it is 
a substance that will check. We all know that the trees are contin- 
ually growing, and although to the eye the substance that you have put 
on the tree does not check, if you will take a magnifying glass you will 
notice minute cracks all through the line and the worm will enter 
through those cracks. 

QUESTION. In leaving the roots open would the tree be affected by 
the frost? 

Mr. EHRHORN. Well of course that would be hard to say. a think 
it would be injurious with a heavy frost. I do not think leaving the 
roots uncovered is a good plan, especially if you are going to have a 
wet season; there is no object init. If you have the borers dug out you 
need not fae the entrance of new ones until April comes. 


THE VINE-HOPPER. ee 


Mr. HUTCHINS, or Marysvittx. I would like to hear something — * 


about the vine-hopper. I have heard that Mr. Gordon has discovered 


a remedy which prevents them from destroying his grapes. 


Mr. GORDON. Mr. Chairman, Ladies, and Gentlemen: I did not 


expect to have to pop up here and talk about the vine-hopper. How- 


TWENTY- FOURTH ANNUAL FRUIT-GROWERS CONVENTION. 141 


ever, as my name is called, I will say a few words. The vine-hopper, 
or leaf-hopper, or whatever the proper name may be, is a serious 
- menace to the vineyardists of Fresno County, and it is a question in my 
mind if they don’t destroy, completely, some of the crops in years to 
come. I talked with my friend Mr. Hutchins about the vine-hopper 
and the experiments I made last year, also concerning other experi- 
ments made by some of the professors at the University, and if I should 
seem to criticise our State University I am drawn into it by my friend 
Mr. Hutchins. I said to Mr. Hutchins that Professor Woodworth and 
several others came up and had done the best they could to suggest 
some plan to rid ourselves of the vine-hopper; and I said that, so far 
as the experience of myself and my neighbors went, the plans were all 
failures. Last season the vine-hopper attacked a portion of my vine- 
yard, and so seriously during the month of June that I got very much 
alarmed, for the reason that two years before they had destroyed a 
$5,000 crop for me, and naturally enough I became excited when they 
attacked me again last spring. I went and purchased twenty tons of 
growing alfalfa, and had it mown down and raked up and hauled into 
the vineyard. The alfalfa was not quite in bloom. I went to town and 
- employed a lot of men to put the twenty tons on thirty-nine acres of 
vineyard—perhaps forty acres. Asa result of placing that alfalfa over 
the vines, I gathered from my forty acres fifty-nine and three-fourths 
tons of grapes, and I figure that this saved me in the pete nver ead of 
$1,500. 

QUESTION. Do the vine-hoppers stay with you all summer? 

Mr. GORDON. Before the summer was over I lost some grapes from 
them. —. 

QUESTION. Did the vine-hopper desert the vineyard where the 
alfalfa was spread? 

Mr. GORDON. I think a did; some of them were there all sum- 
mer, but they were not near so thick as where there was no alfalfa. 
You should not put the alfalfa on so thick that the sun and air cannot 
get to the vines. For twenty thousand vines I would use twenty tons 
of alfalfa. A laborer can cover about seven hundred vines per day. 

QUESTION. What happened to the vines afterward? 

Mr. GORDON. They came up growing and putting on new leaves. 
Two days before I picked my crop I had two men go ahead and lift the 
alfalfa from the vines. 

QUESTION. What did you do with the alfalfa? 

Mr. GORDON. I plowed it in every alternate row and let it stay 
there. 

Pror. WOODWORTH. I should think that was very dangerous, as 
the nitrogen in that alfalfa in proportion to the other plant-foods might 
prove disastrous next year? 

Mr. GORDON. I will take my chances and plow it in. 


and generously entertained the convention; therefore, be it 
cel, That the members of the convention hereby most sincerely jhank the Ci 


our stay in Sah José will not soon be foneonten, We particularly desire to express ¢ 
gratification to the Santa Clara County Fruit Exchange for the price of inshee 
their magnificently appointed establishment. “ 
Resolved, That the members of the California Fruit-Growers’ Gonventae in assembly 
recognize and appreciate the courtesies of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company 
which kindly granted the convention special rates to San José, thereby material 
aiding membership and interest in the convention; and be it further 2 
Resolved, That we thank the Southern Pacific Pairoad Company for the kindness 
a special train to Stanford University. We also thank Mr. Thomas A. Graham, Distric 
Freight and Passenger Agent at San José, at whose friendly solicitation the train wa , 
secured, and for his many other courtesies to the visiting delegates. < 
Resolved, That the thanks of this convention are especially tendered to the press 
San José and San Francisco for full and fair reports of the proceedings of this body 
thereby aiding and encouraging the fruit industry of the State: 2 


Adopted by unanimous vote. ‘. 
Jupec—E LEWIS. We are about to depart for our homes. The people - ; 
of San José are proud to know that such a splendid convention has 
been held in their city. I was not present when you fixed the uae = 
for the next meeting, but understand that it is to be held in Marysville; 
but wherever it is, we of Santa Clara County wish to say, in the ee 
language of Root, “ Entreat us not to leave thee or cease from pa 2 
after thee; for wherever thou goest, we will go; thy God shall be our — 
God, and we shall be one.” 
PRESIDENT COOPHR. For myself and on the part of the State Board a | 
Horticulture, I feel very much gratified at the attendance, as also at ies 
universal good feeling among all these who have assembled here. ae 
Adjourned sine die. 


(Notr.—Owing to the closing of the State Printing Office during the two preceding ss 
years, the proceedings of the 20th, 21st, 22d, and 23d State Fruit-Growers’ Conventions ~ 
were not printed and are therefore not available.) Fae 


APPENDIX. 


CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION. 


In response to a call issued by the committee of twenty-one appointed 
by the State Fruit-Growers’ Convention for said purpose, there assem- 
bled at San José, on January 15th, 1900, a convention of fruit-growers 
from throughout the State, having in view the formation of an association 

_ through which they may dispose of their fruit at more profitable prices. 
The attendance considerably exceeded the thousand limit. It was repre- 
sentative both in the horticultural character and standing of the delegates 


= _ and in the geographical breadth of the area represented—north and south, 


coast and interior, valley and foothill, all were largely represented. 
The spirit of the assembly also was most gratifying. The confidence 
that the organization in view was possible, and that the right course 
toward it was chosen, gave point and strength to the: whole procedure. 
The convention chose what seems to be the safest and most direct route 
toward success. It builded directly upon the broadest and most unequiy- 
ocal success which California codperative effcrts have yet achieved, and 
that is, the work of the Raisin-Grower’s Association. ? 

The following are the Articles of Incorporation, Directors chosen, and 

By-Laws adopted: 


ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION. 


Know aut Men py THESE Presents: That we, the undersigned, being 
citizens and residents of the State of California, have this day volun- 
tarily associated ourselves together for the purpose of forming an associa- 
tion under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, and 
particularly in pursuance of the provisions of an act entitled “An Act 
_ to provide for incorporation, operation, and management of Codperative 
_ Associations,” approved March 27,1895; and in that behalf we do hereby 
Ba Certily: ; 


I. That the name of the association is Tue CALIFORNIA CURED 
Fruir ASsocraTION. . 


II. That the purposes for which said association is formed are, to 
buy, pack, handle, sell, market, and otherwise dispose of cured decidu- 


144 CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION. 


ous fruits and nuts, and to act as the agent and factor in the handling — 

and disposition of the same for individuals, corporations, associations, 
and co-partnerships in every manner; to buy, rent, build, purchase, sell, _ 
lease, and operate packing-houses, cjintaas and other buildings, ani Bi 
to lease, purchase, and own the lands upon which such buildings are 
situated; to borrow money and give any and all evidences of debt there- __ 
for, and any and all kinds of security therefor to the same purpose and _ 
extent as a natural person; to establish and maintain a uniform and 
correct system of grading fruits and nuts, and in general to do, perform, — 
and take any and all steps and proceedings necessary and proper 0° San 
fully carry out each and all the provisions of this article according to — 
their true meaning and intent, and to the same purpose and extent as a 
natural person. : | Ne 


III. That the place where the principal business of said association Bie: 
is to be transacted is the City of San José, County of Santa Clara, ‘ 
State of California. 


IV. That the term for which said association is to exist is fifty (50) 
years from and after the date of its incorporation. | = 


V. That the number of its Directors shall be nine, and that names 
and residences of those selected for the first year are as follows, to wit: 
H. G. Bond, Santa Clara; L. F. Graham, San José; J. H. Henry, San 
José; F.N. Woods, Westside; A. B. Fletcher, Campbell; H. W. Meek, 
San Lorenzo; M. Theo. Kearney, Fresno; J. B. DeJarnett, Colusa; 
Charles Tpeian. Los Angeles; Thos. J ae Visalia; W. Ee Wool 

Fulton. ; 


VI. That the amount which each member of aad association is to 
pay upon admission, as membership fee, is the sum of five dollars 
($5.00), and that each member signing these articles of association has | 
actually paid in such sum of money, to wit: five dollars ($5.00),and 
that the interest and rights of each member therein is to be at all times — 
equal. 


In Witness WHEREOF we have hereunto set our hands and seals — 
this day of pal (819) 


ae a os 


BY-LAWS. 


The name of the association shall be THE Canoe CurED FRuIT - 
ASSOCIATION. 


ARTICLE I. Corporate Powers.—The corporate powers of this = ‘ 
Association shall be vested in a board of eleven directors, who shall be 23 ae 
members of the Association, holding one certificate of membershipon the 


a 


oe : ae 


CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION. 145 


books of the Association ; and six Directors shall constitute a quorum for 


- the transaction of business. 


ARTICLE II. Election of Directors.—The Directors shall be 


- elected by ballot at the annual meeting of the stockholders, to serve | 


for one year and until their successors are elected. Their term of office 


_ shall begin immediately after election. If any Director should cease at 


any time, in pursuance of the provisions of these by-laws, to be a mem- 


ber of the Association, the Directors remaining may, by resolution, 


declare the ‘position of such Director vacant, and thereupon and upon 


such resolution being adopted, the position of such Director shall 
become at once vacant, to be filled in accordance with these by-laws. 


ARTICLE III. Vacancies.—Vacancies in the Board of Directors 
shall be filled at any meeting of the Board by the other Directors in 
office, and such Directors so appointed shall hold office until the next 


meeting of the members, and until their successors are elected by the 


members. In the event, at any time, the members should be dissatisfied 
with any of the Directors serving, the President of the Association shall, 


“upon petition signed by not less than one hundred members of the 


_ Association, call a special meeting of the members of the Association 


for the purpose of determining whether the position of such Director, or 
Directors, shall be declared vacant, and for the election of another 
Director, or Directors, in lieu thereof, which special meeting shall be 
called in pursuance of the provisions of these by-laws; and at any such 
meeting so held, a majority of the members of the Association shall 


~ elect to declare the position of any Director vacant, and shall thereupon 


elect a Director or Directors to fill any such vacancy. 
- The President and First Vice-President shall hold office until their 


~ suecessors are elected. 


ARTICLE IV. Powers of Directors.—The Directors shall have. 
power— nSs 

1. To call special meetings of the members whenever they deem it 
necessary, and they shall call a meeting at any time upon the written 
request of not less than one hundred members of the Association. 

2. Toappoint and remove at pleasure all officers, except the President 
and First Vice-President, agents and employés of the Association, pre- 
scribe their duties, fix their compensation, and may require from them 
security for faithful service. 

3. To conduct, manage, and control the affairs and the business of the 
Association, and to make rules and regulations not inconsistent with 
the laws of the State of California, or the by-laws of the Association, for 


the guidance of the officers and management of the affairs of the 


Association. 


== Be 


146 CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION. 


4, In addition to the liability of the Association as agents anal ‘aches 
the Board of Directors has power to contract. an indebtedness in any 
sum not exceeding two hundred thousand dollars in the aggregate, an 
for the purposes of the Association may borrow money not in excess of 
- said sum of two hundred thousand dollars, and may issue any and ps 
notes and bills and other evidences of indeiicdtess therefor, and may — 
hypothecate and mortgage any of the property of the Association as 
security for the sums so borrowed. The amounts of such indebtedness, 
the terms and purposes thereof, shall be entered in the minutes of the | 
proceedings of the Board, and the note or obligation of the Association 
evidencing the same, and all contracts and security given therefor, shall “4 
be signed by the President and Secretary, and as such shall be ne 
upon the Association; and any and all indebtedness in excess of two © 
hundred thousand aloes shall be absolutely void as against the | 
Association. 


, 


ARTICLE V. Duties of Directors.—It shall be the dute of tee ms 
Directors: e 

1. To cause to be kept a complete record of all their minutes and acts, : 
and of the proceedings of the members, and present a full statement ay sa 
the regular annual meeting of the mean bees showing in detail the assets 
and liabilities of the Association, and Sonseaiie: the condition of affairs. —— 
A like statement, less in detail, shall be presented at any other meeting — =: 
of the members on demand of at least one third (4) of the members OB : 
the Association. ig. 
. 2. To supervise all officers, agents, and employés and. see that their ae 
duties are properly nenoiaed: to cause to be issued to the members — ne: 
certificates of membership to each member of the Association, the rights 
and interests of all members to be equal, and no member can ever acquire — 
any greater interest in the Association than any other member has. re 


ARTICLE VI. Officers.—A1] officers shall be elected by the Board ‘ 
of Directors, except the President and First Vice-President, who shall ’ 
be elected by the members as herein provided. The Second Vice-Presi- 
dent shall be elected from the Board of Directors. The compensation of — 
the Directors shall be fixed by the members of the Association, and Re 4 
all other officers and employés, except the Executive Commitee es Be 
be fixed and determined by the Board of Directors. | 


ARTICLE VII. The Board of Directors shall, at their first veg 2 
meeting, elect one of their number to act as Second Vice-President, who, Py 
if the President and First Vice-President shall be unable for any reason — 
to act, shall take the place of the First Vice-President and perform his 
duties, and if at any time the President and both Vice-Presidents shall 
be unable to act for any reason, the Directors shall appoint some other 


CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION. . 147 


- member of the Board to do so, in whom shall be vested for the time being 


the duties and functions of the office of President. The President, the 
First Vice-President, the Second Vice-President, ‘or in their absence the 


Director appointed as above provided: 


1. Shall preside over all meetings of the members and Directors. 


° 


2. He shall sign, as President, all certificates of membership and all 


contracts and other instruments in writing which have been first 


approved by the Board of Directors, and he shall draw checks upon the 
Treasurer. , ; 

3. He shall call the Directors together whenever he deems it neces- 
sary, and he shall have, subject to the control of the Directors, direction - 
of the affairs of the Association, and generally shall discharge such | 
other duties as may be required of him by the by-laws of the Association. 

The President, or two of the Directors, may call special meetings of . 
the Directors at any time, and notice thereof shall be given by serving 
a written or telegraphic or telephonic notice thereof upon each of the 
Directors; or if personal notice cannot be given to any of the Directors, 
as above provided, then by leaving a written notice of said meeting at 
the last known place of business or residence of each Director, or by . 
mailing the same to the last known place of business or residence of 
each Director at least twenty-four (24) hours before the time of meeting. 
The notice in either case shall be complete on the mailing of the notice 
in the United States postoffice at San José, postage prepaid ; or, if by 
telegraph or telephone, upon the delivery of the telegram or telephone 
message to the telegraph or telephone company at San José. The 
Secretary, or other person serving the notice, may adopt any of said 
modes of service in his judgment most likely to give notice to the 
Director so to be served. The fact of the service of said notice shall be 
entered upon the minutes of the Association, and said minutes upon 
being read and approved, at a subsequent meeting of the Board, shall 
be conclusive upon the question of service. | 


ARTICLE VIII. Secretary.—The Board of Directors shall elect a 
Secretary from either their own members, or a person not connected with 
the Association, at their pleasure, whose duties shall be as follows: 

1. To keep a record of the proceedings of all meetings of the Board 


> of Directors, and of the menbers. 


2. He shall keep the corporate seal of the Association, and the books 
of blank certificates of membership, fill and countersign all certificates 
issued, and make the corresponding entries in the margin of such books 


_on such issuance, and he shall affix said corporate seal to all papers 


- 


requiring a seal. 

3. He shall keep a proper transfer book and a membership ledger, in 
debit and credit form, showing the number of certificates of membership 
issued, and the date of such issuance. : 


148 _ CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION. 


4. He shall keep proper books of account of in Anaoclation coun er- 
sign all checks upon the Treasurer, and discharge such other duties 2 
pertain to his office, and as are prescribed by the Board of Director: 

5. He shall serve all notices required either by law or by the by-1 
of this Association, and in case of his absence, inability or refusal to ¢ 
so, then such notices may be served by any person whom the Preside: 
or either of the Vice-Presidents of the Association may designees f 
that purpose. 


ARTICLE IX. Treasurer.—The Treasurer shall receive ed k | 
all funds of the Association, and pay them out only on check of a 
_ President, countersigned by the Secretary. 


ARTICLE X. Books and Papers.—The books and oa papers : 
_ may be placed on file by vote of the members or the Directors, shall : 
all times in business hours be subject to the Boke ee of the Directo: 
and members. : 


ARTICLE XI. Certificates of Membership.—Certificates of mem- 
bership shall be of such form and device as the Directors may designate. | 
Each certificate shall be signed by the President, and countersigned by ae . 
the Secretary, and express on its face the number, date of issuance, and a : 
the person to whom it is issued. The certificate book shall contain a oe 
margin on which shall be entered the number, date, and name of ‘hoes 
person expressed in the corresponding certificate. No member shall 
hold, under any circumstances, more than one certificate of membership. 


ARTICLE XII. No certificate of membership can be assigned so Z 
that the transferee thereof can by such transfer become a member of 
the Association, except by the resolution of the Board of Directors of 
the Association accepting such transfer; but by the consent of the * s 
Board of Directors by a resolution duly aaennd any certificate of mem- R Bs 
bership may be transferred, so that the transferee may become a member y 
in lieu of such former holder thereof. No certificate shall be accepted _ 
by the Secretary and canceled before a new certificate of membership 
is issued in lieu thereof and a resolution of the Board consenting to 
such transfer duly adopted and passed; but upon such transfer being 
made, and the consent of the Directors being obtained, the Secretary 
shall, upon request of the transferee, cancel the old certificate and 1 issue — 
a new one in lieu thereof, and shall preserve the certificate so cancele 
as a voucher. If, however, a certificate shall be lost or destroyed, th 
Board of Directors may order a new certificate issued upon such gua: 
antee by the parties claiming the same, as they may deem satisfactor, 


ARTICLE XIII. Meetings.—The first annual meeting of the mem-. 


CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION. 149 


a Wednesday in June, 1901, and annually thereafter, at the hour of 10 
_ A.M. of said day, at some hall or other place of meeting to be designated 
bya resolution of the Board of Directors and stated in the notice calling 
the meeting, and shall be called by a notice printed in one or more 
new yspapers printed and published in the City of San José, as the Board 
of Directors may direct, for at least ten (10) days next preceding the 
day of meeting, or by a notice in writing by the President mailed to 
each member personally, by inclosing the same in a secure envelope, 
postage thereon prepaid, and addressed to the last known residence of 
each member, and deposited in the postoffice at San José, at least ten 
(10) days next preceding the day of meeting. Special meetings of the 
members may be called in like manner, after ten (10) days’ notice 
thereof given in either of the modes aforesaid. No meeting of the mem- 
bers shall be competent to transact business unless a majority of the 
entire membership is represented either in person or by ballot, except 
to adjourn from day to day, or until such time as may be deemed 
proper. At such annual meeting of the members Directors for the 
ensuing year shall be elected by ballot, as hereinbefore provided, to 
serve for one year, and until their successors are elected. If, however, 
for want of a quorum or other cause, a members’ meeting shall not be 
held on the day above named, or should the members fail to complete 
- their election, or such other business as may be presented for their con- 
sideration, those present may adjourn from day to day until the same 
shall be accomplished. At every election held in pursuance of the by- 
laws, each member shall be entitled to cast but one (1) vote, and such 
voting shall not be in any manner cumulative. 
Hach member may vote in person or by ballot forwarded by mail, 
-_ and in voting by mail he must inclose his ballot in an envelope duly 
sealed, which envelope shall be inclosed in another envelope addressed 
__ to the Secretary.at San José, with a memorandum stating that such 
inclosed envelope contains the ballot of the party so voting. The © 
Secretary shall thereupon deposit such ballot in the box sealed, and - 
enter in the poll list the name of the voter, and such ballot: shall be 
-_ opened and counted as other ballots. 
Regular meetings of the Board of Directors of this Association shall 
be held in the City of San José quarterly, on the first Wednesday of 
June, September, December, and March of each year, at the hour of 10 
A.M. of said day, and the Directors may also establish from time to 
time, as may be desired, other days and times for special meetings of 
_ the Directors as the necessities of the Association may require; and 
_ when entered upon the minutes of said Association shall be considered 
the regular days for the meetings of the Directors of this Association to 
__ the same purpose and extent as if herein specifically stated. The days 
of the meeting may be changed from time to time by like resolution 


so 4 
eg 
om 


Ea Re, 


ye 


150 CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION. 


duly adopted by the Directors and entered upon their minutes. 
notice of the meetings of the Directors, as established by these by-l *e 
or as may be established by the resolution of the Directors, need be giv oe cS 
ARTICLE XIV. Qualification of Membership. Ne person shal a di 
be eligible to membership in this Association unless he shall have paic 


the membership fee of five dollars, and is the owner, or _ tenant of th ne 
owner, of an orchard w hich produces deciduous fruits or nuts, and 


crop of Pemsas fruits or nuts. All persons above the age of gta m : 
(18) years, regardless of sex, and any and all co-partnerships, associa- a 
tions, and incorporations ‘shall be eligible to membership if otherwise — 
qualified as herein provided. If at any time any person who is a mem-_ 
ber in good standing shall cease to possess the qualifications necessary — 
to entitle him to become eligible as a member of this Association, the ‘ 
Board of Directors, upon notification thereof, may, by resolution duigt = 
adopted, declare such a member no longer a member of the Association, — te 
and thereupon he shall cease to be a member; notification of sueh reso- — - 
lution to be forthwith sent to such es by the Secretary of the | 
Association by notice thereof, inclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, — 

and addressed to the member’s last known residence or place of busi-_ cs . 
ness, and deposited in the postoffice at San José. The Board of 
Directors shall have power from time to time, upon application and — 
petition of any such member who shall by resolution have been declared, — . 
to be no longer a member of this Association, to rescind, change, or 
modify any such resolution, and reinstate such member. wee 


ARTICLE XY. Appraisal of Interest in Membership.—Upon a 
resolution being duly passed by the Board of Directors hereof, cancel-_ 
ing any membership as hereinbefore provided, any member so expelled, 
and whose certificate shall have been canceled, shall have the right to 
have the Board of Directors appraise his fee ah in the Association in > 
either money, property, or labor, as the Directors shall deem best, and = 
to have the money, property, or labor so awarded him paid, or delivered, 
or performed, within forty (40) days after expulsion; and the Board of 
Directors shall, upon application therefor, appraise the expelled mem- oes 
ber’s interest as hereinbefore provided, and shall thereupon pay or deliver ¥ 
to the expelled member the money, property, or labor so awarded to him. S 


- 


ARTICLE XVI. Bonds.—Bonds shall be required by the Board ofS 
Directors of this Association of the Treasurer, and all other officers and — 2 
employés of this Association, in the discretion of the Board of Directors, 
in such an amount and containing such provisions as may be’ deemed 
best by the Board of Directors. All bonds shall be executed By the = 


es fae 
a * 


CALIFORNIA CURED FRUIT ASSOCIATION. _ Tol 


% ‘principal, with sufficient sureties, approved by the President of the 
_ Association, and shall be thereupon filed where designated by the 
_ Directors. 


ARTICLE XVII. Compensation of Directors.—Hach Director 
- attending any meeting of the Board of Directors shall be entitled, as 
“compensation, to the sum of ten ($10.00) dollars for each and every 
meeting so attended, and also his necessary expenses incurred in the 
attendance of said meeting; provided, however, that any Directors receiv- 
-  inga monthly salary from the Association shall not be entitled to the 
compensation herein provided. 

E The compensation of the President is hereby fixed at five hundred 
($500.00) dollars per month, and that of the other members of the 
Executive Committee at three hundred ($300.00) dollars per month each. 


ARTICLE XVIII. Executive Committee.—The Board of Directors 
shall appoint from their number an Executive Committee, including 
the President and Vice-President of the Association. The President 
shall be ex-officio chairman of said committee, for the transaction of 
such business of the Association as may require attention; but all such 

business shall be submitted to, and approved by the Board of Directors 
at their next regular meeting, if required, and this committee shall con- 
stitute a standing committee of the Association, a majority of whom may 
act. Meetings of the committee shall be held from time to time, as the 
necessities of the Association may require, without any formal notice 
being given, but sufficient notice shall be given to each member of the 
committee to be present at the time and place appointed for the meeting, 
to enable him to attend if he so desires. The Secretary shall attend all 
such meetings and keep minutes of the proceedings and the business 
transacted at any such meeting, and the facts of notice having been 
given as hereby required to each member of the Executive Committee, 
entered upon such minutes, shall be conclusive evidence of that fact. 


arr 


¥ 


% 


ese Pee Rl SE Me Ee ee eh epee he Mee CU ae eee ee = 
} ij . "x . | . 


aS 


is i ath iby 


ARTICLE XIX. Amendments.—These by-laws may be amended 
or modified by the vote of a majority of all the members, after notice of 
the proposed amendment shall be given and a meeting called in accord- 
ance with the provisions of Articie Thirteen; to the notice of such meet- 
ing there shall be attached a copy of the proposed amendment or 
amendments. 


a ARTICLE XxX. Division of Profits.—Profits of the Association 
shall be divided among the members thereof at such a time and manner 
_ asthe Board of Directors may deem best, and whenever such profits 
@ shall, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, warrant a division of 
the same. 


| words: « aitarnit Cured Fruit” Association, ee: 
=, 1900. » | 3 : 


. ‘ - rey ’ 
hig ys 
2 : 
ct ‘ 
. a ‘ p= ; 
, 
: 
¥ E =e "i 
Xs: es 
\ 
) 
: 
i i 
: ¥ 
~ p , - 
2} . 5 ee 
: @ ae 7 j 
; 
a 
fe 
. 
3 
‘ 
" 4. 
Tn 
i 
: 
E } 
* . 
~ ¢ . 
ils ’ 
] S 
, 


sea Oe ee 


’ 


LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 


SINNOTT 


QO009169507