Orchard notes

Historic, archived document

Do not assume content reflects current
scientific knowledge, policies, or practices.

NA Le
Nn
4)

4

were
Fite &

Aj

See Shee ay ies

nowy

>

us

ye Cntr
wiyseettaaipe= SG IY

i

i
iE

aS

Maine Agricultural Experiment Station

BULLETIN No. 128. MARCH, 1906.

ORCHARD NOTES.

This bulletin contains notes on spraying for caterpil-
lars, scale insects, apple scab, and pink rot; the results
of an unbalanced ration on fruit; the winter injury to
trees from freezing and mice; and suggestions as to

handling fruit and pruning.

Requests for bulletins should be addressed to the
AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION,
Orono, Maine.

MAINE
AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
ORONO, MAINE.

THE STATION COUNCIL,

PRESIDENT GEORGE E. FELLOWS ......-. .- . President
DIRECTOR CHARLES D. Woops .......--+ - - - Secretary
JOHN A. ROBERTS, Norwa AG SRC RO ae nD :
CHARLES L. ONTO. Conte ‘ | Commie) 3
Board of Trustees
AUEUR TRE DURGING Orono at ie ete
Avuaustus W. Gitman, Foxcroft . . . Commissioner of Agriculture
EvuGENE H. Lissy, Auburn. ....... =. + + « State Grange
CHARLES S. Popr, Manchester . . . . . State Pomological Society
RUTILLUS ALDEN, Winthrop . . . ° . State Dairymen’s Association

JAMES M. BARTLETT
Lucius H. MERRILL
FREMONT L. RUSSELL .
WELTON M. MUNSON |
GILBERT M. GOWELL . |
ED EtaeM SPAT OHS 4 2k-2h) eo eh he stn Rone ne moners j

of the
Station Staff

| Members

THE STATION STAFF,

CHARLES D. Woops . . . week Siar: Mel ened Director
JAMES M. BARTLETT . }

Lucius H. MERRILL | :
HERMAN H. HANSON ( Chee
Lewis I. NURENBERG . J

KR EMOND Gs RUSS EL Irs alent ateiiee nT Iibcr Suir) ciit-)-telk eae Veterinarian
WELTON M. MunSON. ...... . . . - . Horticulturist

GILBERT M. GOWELL .

' "\ Poultry Investigations
WALTER ANDERSON ; : Y g

EpitH M. PATCH . Pe ah AES ON Reba fame Entomologist
BEssIE G. TOWER. - ..- - - ». Microscopist and Photographer
ANNIE M.SNOW .....-.- - - + += ~ Clerk and Stenographer

Henry A. MILLETT . . . -. . Meteorological Observer and Janitor

‘eZ ased 9aS
(2) Woes poourjequn ue Jo Joyo oy, “1 INST

ORCHARD NOTES.
W. M. Munson.

The; fact that the apple grows in many parts of the State as
though it were indigenous and that orchards will exist and bear
a partial crop of fruit though seriously neglected, is responsible
for much of the ill-treatment so common to the orchards of
Maine. There is little doubt, however, that a well managed
orchard is a most valuable farm property, and one of the surest
sources of income. For many years the Experiment Station
has devoted a large amount of attention to the orchard industry,
as evidenced by its publications on this important subject. It
is the purpose of the present bulletin to report recent observa-
tions and experiments upon successful orchard management.

NovTES ON SPRAYING.

“Watch and spray,” as well as “cultivate and feed,” must be
the motto of the successful orchardist. The importance of
watchfulness, and the direct value of spraying, as a means of
holding in check insect and fungous enemies of the orchard,
have been repeatedly urged by this Experiment Station * and
in so far as suggestions made have been followed, the results
obtained by the fruit-growers of the State have been satisfactory.

By the work of this Station it has been shown beyond doubt
that, by spraying at the proper time, and in the proper manner,
the canker worm, tent caterpillar and forest caterpillar may be
held in check; that the “apple worm” or codling moth may be
controlled; that scale insects may be destroyed; that the green
aphis or plant louse may be killed; that apple scab, cracking of
pears, and rotting of plums may be very greatly reduced ;—and
still spraying is not a common practice among the fruit-growers
of Maine!

*Repts. Maine Expt. Sta. 1891, 1892, 1893, 1894; Buls. 8, 52, 56.

66 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1906.

With the great orchardists of New York, Michigan and the
Pacific slope, spraying is just as much a part of the regular work
of fruit growing as is pruning, or even harvesting. No live
orchardist of California or Oregon would think of omitting the
five or six treatments with Bordeaux mixture and Paris green,
or with kerosene emulsion or resin wash, as the case might
demand, any more than he would omit frequent cultivation or
irrigation. It is because of this thoroughness in the production
of fruit, as well as in grading and packing, that the fruit growers
of the northwest are able to send their fruit across the continent
and so nearly control the local eastern markets.

REASON FOR SPRAYING.

The leaves of plants have two functions essential to life and
health. They act, in a measure, as both lungs and stomach for
the plant. Consequently if they are destroyed or diseased, the
whole plant suffers; the crop of fruit is lessened; and the
vitality of the plant is weakened. It is for this reason that
spraying is of importance, even in those seasons when there is no
fruit. Spraying is an insurance and not a remedy, and there
should be a definite purpose in view for every application.
Specific directions for controlling the leading insect and fungous
enemies of the orchard are given in “ How to Fight Apple
Enemies,” published by this Experiment Station and sent free to
any one requesting it.

RESULTS OF SPRAYING.

In a recent canvas of the orchards of Wayne and Orleans
counties, New York, by Dr. George F. Warren,* it was found
that in Wayne county, of 66 sprayed orchards, representing 626
acres, the yield in 1903 was at the rate of 280 bushels per acre;
while 107 unsprayed orchards, covering 673 acres, yielded at the
rate of 253 bushels per acre. For the sprayed fruit the average
price per barrel was $2.02; while for the unsprayed fruit the
price was but $1.80.

* Bul. 226, 227, Cornell Univ. Expt. Sta.

ORCHARD NOTES. 67

Of 179 orchards canvassed in Orleans county the following
report was made:

Yields and incomes from orchards sprayed different numbers of

times.
YIELDS. 3 INCOMES.
Senice Sel) og |S
aS a © © =) A H So ®
How treated. oz Pe eS 6a oe Creel arerics

Os 2a foe - Oa 2a um | a

so | go | oar || £2 || ga | Bo | So

5 Bis) | Po og ey 55 | >So

Ao As tA eS) Zo Ae <5 &
MMB RAY CO Versys) atvioye\e(algisietelelaieiere 43 381.0 328 66 54 449.5 $103
Sprayed once ............0... 33 352.0 346 74 30 316.0 139
Sprayed twice............... 70 701.0 374 78 64 644.0 148
Sprayed three times ........ ai 247.5 414 87 25 236.5 184
Sprayed four times.......... 6 43.0 569 77 6 43.0 211

The significance of the figures given is so obvious that com-
ment is unnecessary, except that they corroborate in full the

experience of those who have practiced similar treatment in this
State.

THE MENACE OF THE CATERPILLAR.

The approach of the gypsy moth and the brown-tail, has
stirred the people of Maine to such an extent as to insure active
steps for the control of these pests. Every year, however, trees
are defoliated by canker worm, forest caterpillar, tent caterpillar,
and similar enemies, with little attempt on the part of growers to
protect themselves from damage.

It is well understood that the forest caterpillar appears in
destructive numbers at more or less irregular intervals; only to
disappear again, after ruining many orchards and defoliating
hundreds of thousands of forest trees. ‘This disappearance is
caused by the rapid increase of natural parasites. With the
destruction of the caterpillars, the parasites die, and so there is an
alternation in the period when there are many and when there
are few of these pests.

The last serious invasion of the forest caterpillar was in 1897
and 1898, when whole orchards were swept as if by fire for two
successive seasons. The results were naturally disastrous. It
is now nearly time for a return of this caterpillar and the enter-
prising orchardist will be ready to meet it.

68 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1906.

That the pest may be held in check was plainly demonstrated
by the work of the Station during the last invasion. A large
orchard of Baldwins which was sprayed with Paris green when
the caterpillars first appeared and twice afterwards, was almost
free from injury, while adjoining trees, not sprayed, were com-
pletely defoliated, and never recovered from the injury. The
accompanying cuts represent the condition of the two orchards
late in June. |

Similar results have repeatedly been obtained in fighting the
canker worm. It is highly important, however, that, for either
of these pests, spraying be done just as soon as the leaves begin
to unfold, and again in about a week or ten days. After the
larve become half grown, spraying is not always effective.

Another precautionary measure to be borne in mind, in deal-
ing with the forest caterpillar, is to prevent migration from tree
to tree, and from forest trees to the orchard trees. This may be
effected by placing a band of tarred paper about the trunk of the
tree and smearing this with a thick coating of equal parts of lard
and sulphur. It is very important that this mixture be not
placed directly on the bark of the tree, as injury almost invari-
ably results.

The method here noted was used with remarkable success in
the orchards above mentioned. ‘The caterpillars gathered by
the hundred beneath the band, but would not cross the line, and
were readily disposed of by means of a swab dipped in a very
strong solution of washing powder. ‘The masses of caterpillars
upon the limbs were destroyed in the same way; those that
escaped by dropping to the ground being stopped by the bands,
and then killed as above.

OYSTER-SHELL BARK LOUSE.

An insect which is nearly as destructive as the dreaded San
Jose scale, is annually doing thousands of dollars worth of dam-
age in the State without the slightest notice on the part of farmer
or fruit grower. This insect—the oyster-shell bark louse—is so
familiar, and yet so inconspicuous, that it is usually overlooked.
The insect is fully described in Bulletin 56 of this Station, to
which the reader is referred. It frequently is the unsuspected
cause of the stunted, sickly appearance of certain trees to be
found in almost every orchard. The mature form, shown in

Figure 2.
The menace of the caterpillar—Trees not sprayed.
See page 67.

Figure 3.
The menace of the caterpillar—Result of spraying with arsenical poisons.
See page 67.

ORCHARD NOTES. 69

figure 5, may very readily be seen where the foliage is off.
Every young orchard should be examined early in the spring
and, if found infested, should be thoroughly treated with caustic
soda or some other strong alkali.

The eggs of this insect hatch in June, or early in July, and the
little lice travel rapidly over the surface of the young wood and
the fruit until they find a satisfactory feeding ground, when they
insert their beaks and begin their campaign against the life of
the tree. Figure 4 shows the young lice, natural size, early
in July.

Spraying the trees thoroughly with kerosene emulsion when
the lice are in the migratory stage, as described in “ How to
Fight Apple Enemies,” has in every instance, at the Station,
been effective in controlling this pest.

APPLE SCAB.

Another ever present, and very generally neglected, pest of
the orchard is the fungus disease, apple scab, or “black spot” as
it is sometimes called. This disease, figure 8, has been so
frequently described as to be perfectly familiar. As shown in
former reports of this Station,* spraying is effective in securing
a crop of fruit relatively free from this disease, even in those
seasons when the scab is most prevalent.

For several years the conditions in most parts of Maine have
been such that the fruit has been relatively free from scab, and
as a result many growers who took up the practice of spraying
some years ago, have gradually ceased to spray. It should be
said, however, that this neglect is wholly comparable to the neg-
lect which permits the lapse of a fire insurance policy. It may
be unnecessary to spray to secure a crop of fair fruit one year,
or even two or three years in succession; but when the unfavor-
able season does come, if spraying has been neglected, there is
frequently a needless loss of several hundred barrels of fruit in
orchards of average size.

As a result of the studies above mentioned + the fact was
clearly demonstrated that, in a bad season, there was a difference
of 50 per cent in the amount of perfect fruit upon sprayed and
unsprayed trees; the best results being obtained from the use

* Ann. Rpt. Maine Expt. Sta. 1891, 1892, 1893, 1894.
t See details and summary, Rpt. Maine Expt. Sta., 1893, 125-128.

7O MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1900.

of Bordeaux mixture. In other words, trees not sprayed gave
on three successive years 4.1, .9, and 38.2 per cent of the fruit
free from scab; while the same years an equal number of trees
sprayed with eau celeste (copper sulphate, carbonate of soda
and ammonia) gave 57.8, 30.1 and 72.8 per cent respectively.
The third year Bordeaux mixture was used and gave still better
results—79.9 per cent of the fruit being free from scab.

From these, and similar results obtained all over the country,
it is evident that spraying has ceased to be an experiment as a
means of controlling certain orchard diseases. The results
above cited have been repeatedly confirmed both at this Station
aiid elsewhere. Reference is made to the subject at this time
only to emphasize the importance of using precautionary
measures. Even though there be no crop of fruit, the increased
vigor of the trees as a result of clean healthy foliage, will far
more than repay the cost of spraying. This spraying with
Bordeaux mixture should be done first before the buds burst,
and again immediately after the blossoms fall, if but two treat-
ments are to be given. If the season is very wet, however, at
least four treatments at intervals of two or three weeks are found
to be advantageous.

PINK ROT.

In 1902 a comparatively new fungous disease made its appear-
ance to a very destructive extent in western New York. This
disease, known as “Pink Rot,” because of its pinkish, mildew-
like appearance, had long been known to botanists but only, or
mainly, as a saprophyte, or fungus which grows on dead or
decaying matter. It did not come under the writer’s personal
observation until the present season; although said to have been
destructive to stored apples in Maine in 1902.

The appearance of this trouble is well shown in figure 9,
from a photograph of fameuse apples grown at the Station the
past year. The best description of the trouble, with a full
account of its life history, is given by Eustace in Bulletin 227
of the New York Agricultural Experiment Station.

The disease attacks the fruit on the scab spots, where it
appears like a pinkish mildew. Later in the season, the spots
become brown, sunken and rotten. If badly attacked the whole
fruit soon decays. Because of its appearance only on the scab
spots, many have regarded it as simply another form of the

ORCHARD NOTES. 71

apple scab. Others have referred to it as a parasite on the scab
fungus. Eustace maintains, however, that “ there is absolutely
no connection between the two. The only part that the scab had
in the matter was that it ruptured the epidermis (skin) of the
apple, thus making an entrance for this fungus to grow into the
tissue and cause the rot.”

A distinctive characteristic of this disease is that the decayed
spots are rather dry and corky, and not very deep. Apples thus
affected might, in some cases, be used for evaporating, as the
diseased portion could be removed in paring; but because of the
bitter character of the rot, affected fruit would be worthless for
cider.

The disease is specially destructive to stored fruit, the
“ sweating ” of the fruit furnishing just the right conditions for
its rapid development. Eustace reports that: “It was notice-
able that the fruit in the bottom of large bins, such as are used
about cider mills and drying houses, would become one mass
of decay if allowed to remain there longer than a few days.” *
It was in stored fruit that the loss before mentioned occurred in
Maine.

As is well known, the “scab” is ever with us, and growers
have become accustomed to its disfiguring presence; but with
the advent of this destructive secondary enemy, the impor-
tance of warding off the attack of both becomes imperative.
Thorough spraying with Bordeaux mixture is the only safe
means of preventing this trouble.

¢

EFFECT OF AN UNBALANCED RATION?

In 1904 an obscure disease affected the fruit of certain trees
in the orchard of Mr. Chas. S. Pope, Manchester. No similar
trouble had ever come under the notice of the writer and this
note is made simply as a matter of record. A careful study of
the cause of the condition described is being carried on at the
present time.

In August, when about the size of walnuts, the fruits began
to crack and to drop. Marked indentations, somewhat similar to
those made by curculio, were abundant. No evidence of insect
work could be discovered, however. When the fruit was
opened, the tissue under the indented parts was found to be dry

* Bul. 227, N. Y. Expt. Sta., 378.

72 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1906.

and brown. Most of the fruit ceased to grow, and by the first
of September the larger part of it was on the ground; though
early in the season all the trees were well loaded. ‘The leaves,
however, appeared perfectly healthy.

At the time of harvesting, October 10, most of the trees had
lost all of their fruit. Such as remained on some of the trees
was, for the most part, small and deformed. Some of the fruit,
however, was of medium size with one side cracked as in figure
1, and a small portion was without marked blemish. In all cases,
however, the texture of the fruit was soft and spongy,—about
as might be expected in April or May. The surface of the
fruits was also characteristic, there being numerous minute
elevations or “ pimples,” corresponding to the grayish dots on
the fruit. This feature is shown in figure 1, and was so
noticeable that the workmen spoke of it in handling the fruit
after removal to the cellar. Though a small portion of the fruit
was on the trees at harvest time, it dropped so easily that no
attempt was made to save it for packing. ‘The slightest jarring
of the limbs would cause it to fall.

The reason for the condition above indicated is, as already
noted, very obscure. A careful microscopic examination was
made without finding evidence of any fungous enemy, even in
the brown dry tissue above mentioned. It was then observed
that the condition existed only with certain trees included in a
fertilizer experiment in which an excess of available nitrogen
is applied every year. The first tree noticed was in the plat
receiving nitrate of soda and acid phosphate, and later it was
found that every tree on this plat, as also on the adjoining plat
which received nitrate only, was affected as described. In one
or two instances check trees which adjoined the nitrate plat, and
received no direct application of fertilizer, showed a tendency
in this direction. None of the other trees in the whole orchard,
however, gave the least indication of the trouble. A fertilizer
plat on which were muriate of potash and acid phosphate, and
another on which was muriate only, separated from the first by
only a single row of trees, were entirely free from the disease.

The supposition was therefore made that the trouble was
physiological and due to the excessive amount of available
nitrogen and the lack of potash. Of course this is a matter of
conjecture and can be settled only by definite and careful experi-
ment.

d

ORCHARD NOTES. 73

In partial support of the supposition adopted, is the report of
Mr. P. L. Ricker of the U. S. Department of Agriculture to
whom specimens of fruit and leaves were sent. Knowing noth-
ing of the conditions under which the trees were growing, Mr.
Ricker reports:* ‘I can make out no signs of any fungus
mycelium in the apple. There is a little ordinary mould around
one of the holes in the apple, but not in condition to determine.
It is not connected with the disease of the apple—if it can be so
called. The main trouble seems to be from the bites of curculio.
* * * The apples have been in a moist chamber ever since
they came but no fungus has developed yet. There is a little
core rot in some of them, the cause of which is not definitely
known, but it is physiological and supposed to be due to some
trouble in nutrition, or perhaps some root trouble. This, how-
ever, can only be determined by examining the roots and the
conditions under which the tree was growing. There are none
of the fungous diseases on the leaves, either. * * * Of
course none of the physiological diseases can be determined
from samples of the plants sent. A careful study of them in
their natural surroundings is necessary, with, perhaps, experi-
ments looking towards the improvement of soil conditions.”

The outcome of a further study of this problem may be of
much interest and some importance in connection with the
rational fertilization of orchards.

WINTER INJURIES TO TREES.

The injuries to trees during winter, in Maine, are usually due
to the freezing of buds or young wood, and to girdling by mice.
Both classes of injury have been emphasized by the severe
winters of the past two or three years.

FREEZING.

The winters of 1903-4 and of 1904-5 were exceptionally severe
in Maine, and as a result many complaints were made that the
apple orchards had suffered more than for the previous twenty
years. An explanation of this condition is not difficult; and a
partial remedy is easily applied. More important than a
remedy, however, is an awakening to the need of using measures
which will prevent a recurrence of the trouble in the future.

* Personal letter to the writer Oct. 21, 1904.

74. MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1906.

There is little doubt that, to a large extent, the injury noted
was due to the full crop of fruit borne in 1904, immediately
following a trying season, and succeeded by a particularly severe
winter. In the early part of the season of 1903, there was a
very slight rainfall. This drought was followed late in the
season by excessive rains which caused a full development of
fruit buds and late growth of wood. Though the trees did not
appear to suffer much after the trying winter which followed,
they were doubtless considerably weakened, and the heavy loads
of fruit borne in the next season left them in an exhausted con-
dition before the second severe winter came on. From the first,
the winter of 1904-5 was trying. In December there were
twenty-six mornings when the mercury went to zero or below,
and several times during the winter 20° to 30° below zero were
reached. Asa (probable) result of these conditions, the trees
suffered as indicated. In almost every case coming under the
writer's observation, the trees which suffered most were those
which bore a full crop the previous year.

The injury was manifested by the killing of the smaller limbs,
and in many cases by the death of the whole tree. The central
portions of the tops of many Gravenstein trees were ruined.
Many Baldwin tops were thinned. So far as observed, how-
ever, there was not a marked difference in the destruction of
nursery grown Baldwins as compared with those top-worked
on seedling stocks; although it is commonly supposed that the
trunk of the Baldwin is tender.*

Trees which had been well cultivated and fertilized, if allowed
to overbear were, in many cases, ruined. One Baldwin tree
which bore 8% barrels of fruit in 1904 (see figure 10, Bul. 122)
was practically ruined. There is little doubt that had one-half
of the fruit been removed from such trees early in the summer,
less trouble would have been experienced.

In neglected orchards, or in many cases where good thrifty
orchards were left in sod, the injured trees continued to deteri-
orate, and many died later in the season. In those cases where
the land was plowed and fertilized, however, the trees started a
new growth of vigorous shoots near the base of the main limbs,
and it will be possible to build a new top on such.
¥im Bulletin 269, N.Y. Agr. Expt. Sta., page 336, Eustace reports that in 1903 young
nursery trees of Baldwin are very susceptible to injury by cold; and Baldwin
and Gravenstein are reported as injured most by some New York growers.

Mr. F. H. Morse of Oxford County, Me., reports injury to the Baldwin trunks in
winter of 1904.5.

ORCHARD NOTES. 75

Those orchards which were not pruned last spring should be
treated at once; all dead wood being removed: and injured
branches being shortened, to give the new wood a chance to
develop. In many cases, too, if a vigorous growth was made
last season, cions may be set which will aid in re-forming a
good top.

To prevent future injury in this way, avoid allowing the trees
to be over loaded with fruit. The fact that as many barrels of
fruit may be secured, with much less strain on the vitality of the
trees, as a result of systematic thinning, has been fully demon-
strated ; and the price received for such thinned fruit will usually
be enough higher to pay cost of labor. In fact the fruit must
be harvested at some time, and it is wiser to remove wormy and
deformed fruit in August, rather than in October.

Proper cultivation and feeding will go far toward putting
trees in condition to withstand a severe winter; but in no case
should cultivation be continued later than August Ist to toth.
A cover crop of some kind sown at the time of last cultivation
will often aid in checking late growth of trees.

Young trees which fail to mature their wood before cold
weather, frequently suffer. Such trees should have the young
wood pinched back about the time of the first frost,—about the
middle of September at Orono; two weeks later in the southern
part of the State.

MICE.

More complaint as to winter injury by mice was heard during
the past season, than since 1891. Whole orchards of bearing
age were ruined. The attention of the writer was called to trees
ten inches in diameter which were almost completely girdled.
This condition was of course due to the very severe winter with
the prevailing deep snows from early December till late in
March. While so much trouble may not be experienced again
for some years, it is liable to occur at any time; and the careful
orchardist will not only repair past injuries but, as far as pos-
sible, prevent future ones.

Any ordinary case of girdling by mice may easily be repaired
by “bridge grafting.’ This consists simply in trimming the
edges of the mangled bark back to where it is firm and healthy,
and inserting cions at intervals of an inch or two around the
girdled portion. This is done by raising the bark, both above

76 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1906.

and below the girdle, with the point of a knife, and putting under
it the end of a cion which has previously been made wedge
shaped at each end. The cion must be fresh, vigorous, young
wood and may be of the same tree, or of any other variety.
When finished the work will be as indicated in figure 6.

To prevent drying of the wood, and of the edges of the bark
before the cions unite, it is well to cover the injured part with a
plastic made of clay and cow dung, and cover the whole with a
piece of burlap,—as an old fertilizer sack.

A tree nearly a foot in diameter was treated by the writer as
described last spring, and every cion united and made a good
growth during the summer.

Figure 7 shows a pear tree about thirty years old that was
bridge grafted when young. It is now more than a foot in
diameter and bears well every year.

Better than repair, however, is the prevention of injury to a
young orchard. ‘This may easily be accomplished by the use of
some protective covering at the base of the tree. The most
common materials used are wire screen, tarred paper, and wood
veneer.

The protectors should be about two feet high, otherwise they
are not always effective. They should also be pressed into the
ground so that mice cannot crawl under. The first cost of the
Wire screen is greater than that of the others, but as it lasts
several years, and requires no attention after the first putting on,
the cost is more than balanced by reduced amount of labor.

The practice at the Station has been to get a roll of 3-foot wire
cloth and cut it into strips two feet long. These strips would
then make four protectors, each nine inches wide. ‘There is an
advantage in using 2-foot wire, if available, because of the
selvage ends, and the reduced amount of cutting required.
These strips are put loosely about the tree and held in place with
small annealed wire at top, middle, and bottom.

The strips of tarred paper are put on in the same way as the
wire cloth, and usually held in place with pieces of twine. It is
very important, however, that the paper be removed in the
spring, as otherwise the trees are in danger of scalding. The
material for protecting 400 young trees with wire last year, cost
$7.50. Tarred paper for an equal number cost 84 cents,—refuse
binding twine being used as tying material. The time required
for applying was about the same in each case. Next spring,

Figure 4. Figure 5.
Oyster-shell bark-louse,—just hatched. Oyster-shell bark-louse,—mature form.
See page 69. See page 60.

Figure 6. Figure 7.
Bridge-grafting of a girdled tree. Saved by bridge-grafting.
See page 76. See page 76.

ORCHARD NOTES. 175

however, the paper must be removed, only to be renewed the
following winter, while no further attention need be given the
wire.

Strips of wood veneer, costing $5.00 per thousand, are largely
used in the western states. About 200 of them were used in
comparison with the other materials named. Very little time is
required for applying them, as no tying is needed, but the work
must be done before freezing weather comes, or many of them
will crack and be worthless.

Another protective measure which has been used with satis-
factory results is the tramping of the snow about the bases of
the trees after a heavy storm. This make a wall of ice which
serves as a barrier. If, after tramping, a covering or mulch of
stable manure is applied, there is less probability that further
tramping will be needed.

Still another, and cheaper, method of protection, is to apply a
coat of paint to the tree. Many fear the effect of the paint, but
if pure materials are used no ill effect appears to follow. On
nursery trees at the Station, white lead, zinc white, and a special
preparation, “ Tanglefoot,” have been used. While it cannot
definitely be said that any of these keep the mice away—since
none of the other trees in the nursery have suffered—no injury
to the trees has in any case resulted.

SuGcESTIONS AS TO HANDLING FRutit.

Just when and how to pick fruit depends largely upon the
kind of fruit, the distance it must be shipped, and the demands of
the market supplied. If one is delivering fruit directly to the
consumer, and catering to a so called “fancy market,” he must
see that the produce is in the very finest desert condition, and
fully ripe before picking. Consumers of such fruit are always
willing to pay an extra price for the advantage of having it in
the highest state of perfection.

The process of ripening is incipient breaking down of plant

“ce

tissue, and there is no well marked distinction between “ green-
ness,” “ripeness” and “decay.” One stage passes into the
other insensibly, and it may be seen that the riper the fruit the
sooner the breaking down of the tissues (in other words decay)
may be expected. Fruits that are picked when very green or

immature will not break down so quickly as those that are

78 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1906.

farther advanced. As a rule, however, such fruits never reach
the most edible stage, and they frequently shrivel and become
unmarketable. Many of the peaches brought into the markets
of Maine are, because of too early picking, totally unfit for use,
but we eat them,—and some call them good. Some of the
winter apples, like Roxbury Russet, and Ben Davis, if harvested
too early, will shrivel and become practically worthless before
spring.

The precise stage at which fruit may be most advantageously
harvested is a matter which each grower must decide for himself,
in accordance with the conditions of his market. Some success-
ful orchardists depend upon Williams’ Favorite as their chief
market apple, allowing the fruit to ripen on the tree and market-
ing only choice dessert specimens. Naturally such a course
would be possible only when there is a good local market.

It may be superfluous to suggest how to pick fruit. Never-
theless this is one of the most important factors in the successful
handling of the product. The hiring of cheap laborers for
picking is of doubtful econcmy, although for many kinds of
work such laborers, who will do as told, are valuable help, even
though not familiar with the details of the business. In general,
however, the picker should understand the importance of his
work, and should bear in mind the fact that every evidence of
handling detracts from the market value of the fruit. There is
a general notion that any one can pick apples, but such is not the
case; and every year large amounts of fruit are lost and many
trees permanently injured by careless or ignorant pickers.
During the past season some of the Tolmans and Alexanders in
the Station orchards were rendered almost unsaleable because
the pickers grasped the fruit so firmly as to leave an imprint of
every finger on the apple.

It is, perhaps, unnecessary to urge that usually the apple is
not ready for harvest until it will part readily from the fruit
spur. The fruit should never be pressed with thumb and fingers,
or thrown into a basket or bag. All fruit should be handled as
carefully as would be necessary with eggs.

During the last apple harvest, in spite of the high price of
fruit, the writer saw a prominent farmer carefully hand pick his
Baldwins and Greenings and then pour them into fertilizer sacks
to carry to the cellar. Nor, strange to say, is this unusual with

ORCHARD NOTES. 79

many farmers who grow a few apples as a side issue. Almost
every day, otherwise good fruit is brought to market in this
careless manner. It is frequently the man who handles fruit in
this way who complains that fruit growing is not a profitable
feature of his farm work.

Pears are frequently injured by being left on the trees too
long. These should be gathered just as soon as they will part
from the tree readily, and should be ripened in a cool, dark place.
In the case of winter pears, the usual guide for harvesting is the
time when the pears begin to drop.

SUGGESTIONS ON PRUNING.

Intelligent pruning at the right time is absolutely essential to
the production of the best fruit. An unpruned tree may, in
many instances, produce a larger number of apples than an
adjacent pruned tree; but the percentage of merchantable fruit
will invariably be smaller. Small apples contain just as many
seeds as large ones, and therefore make practically as great
demands on the store of plant food. They do not, however,
fill the basket, nor the pocketbook, so rapidly as the others.

The amount of pruning necessary depends largely upon the
location and exposure of the orchard. Tiees on a warm, south-
ern slope, freely exposed to the winds, require much less pruning
than do. those in a cool, sheltered location which is lacking in
sunshine. Plenty of light is essential to the production of
highly colored fruit. It is desirable that trees should be pruned
intelligently from the time they are set, but old trees may often
be given a new lease of life by judicious management. If the
trees have been long neglected and require heavy pruning, do
not remove all of the wood the first year. Removal of a portion
of the top, thus distributing the food gathered by the roots to
a smaller number of branches, tends to produce rapid growth
and a renewed vigor of the tree. The removal of too much
at one time, will start the growth of water-sprouts and defeat
the very purpose in view.

The best time for pruning is on warm days from January to
May. More can be accomplished in the longer days of March,

April and May, but many prefer to go through the orchard on
the crust of a deep snow. The time of year when the cut is

80 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1906.

made has little effect on the readiness with which the wound
heals, but more care is necessary to prevent injury to trees
pruned when the wood is frozen.

A wound made by removing a limb heals best if the cut is
made close to the trunk or branch. A stub two or three inches
long does not heal, and becomes a lodging place for spores of
fungi and bacteria which cause decay and death of the tree.
The splitting down of large limbs may often be avoided when
pruning, by sawing in from the under side first; but in every
case, see that the wound is left clean and smooth. Wounds
should also be covered immediately with a coat of paint, shellac,
o1 grafting wax to keep out the moisture and the spores before
mentioned.

Figure 8. Apple Scab. See page 69.

Figure 9. Pink Rot. See page 7o.

aca:
se Vg
yeti