Skip to main content

Full text of "Pathogenicity of the nematodes Rotylenchulus reniformis, Helicotylenchus dihystera, and Tylenchorhynchus claytoni to shade tobacco"

See other formats


Pafhogenicify  of  the  Nematodes  Rotylenchulus  reniformis, 
Helicotylenchus  dihystera,  and  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni 

to  Shade  Tobacco 


By 

SAW  ART  RATANAWORABHAN 


A  DISSERTATION  PRESENTED  TO  THE  GRADUATE  COUNOL  OF 
THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  FLORIDA 
IN  PARTIAL  FULFILLMENT  OF  THE  REQUIREMENTS  FOR  THE 
DEGREE  OF  DOCTOR  OF  PHILOSOPHY 


UNIVERSITY  OF  FLORIDA 

1969 


ACKNOVTLEDGEMEHTS 


The  author  expresses  his  sincere  appreciation  to  members  of  his  super- 
visory committee:  Dr.  Grover  C.  Smart,  Jr.,  Chairman;  Dr.  V.  G.  Perry;  and 
Dr.  Howard  N.  Miller.  A  special  debt  of  gratitude  is  due  Dr.  Smart  for  his 
guidance,  consultation,  and  criticism  of  manuscript. 

He  is  indebted  to  Dr.  William  G.  Eden,  Chairman  of  the  Department  of 
Entomology  and  Hematology^  and  Dr.  Perry,  Prof-.:3sor  of  Kematology, who  made  a 
teaching  assistantship  available  making  it  possible  for  the  author  to  con- 
tinue his  education. 

Appreciation  is  extended  to  ^Ir.  William  B.  Tappan,  Associate  Entomologist, 
North  Florida  Experiment  Station, for  providing  soil,  original  nematode  popu- 
lations, tobacco  seeds  and  valuable  information  regarding  shade-grown 
tobacco . 

He  expresses  his  gratitude  to  Mr.  R.  W.  Patrick  for  assistance  on  several 
occasions  during  the  investigation. 

A  recommendation  of  Mr.  A.  L.  Taylor,  Nematologist ,  formerly  with  FAO 
mission  in  Bangkok,  to  AID  officials  in  Bangkok  granting  the  extension  of 
training  to  the  author  in  order  to  complete  this  investigation  is  greatly 
appreciated. 

Finally,  he  thanks  his  wife  for  her  understanding,  encouragement,  and 
assistance. 


-  ii  - 


CONTENTS 


Page 

ACKKOWLEDGEffiNTS  

LIST  OF  TABLES  

LIST  OF  FIGLTRES  

ABSTRACT  

INTRODUCTION   

LITERATURE  BEVim  

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS   

Pathogenicity   

General  Methods   

Experiment  I  •  

Experiment  II »  III,  and  IV  ■^^ 

Histopathology  of  Rotylenchulus  rentformis 

on  Tobacco  Roots  ^' 

RESULTS  ^' 

Pathogenicity   ^' 

Experiment  I   ^ 

Experiment  II   ^ 

Experiment  III   ^' 

Experiment  IV   1' 

Histopathology    ^ 


DISCUSSION 


3 


Pathogenicity  Experiments    3 

ExDeriment  I   3 

Experiment  II   3 

Exneriment  III   3 

Experiment  IV   3 

Histopathology  

SUT^MARY   ^ 

LITERATURE  CITED    ? 

BIOGRAPHICAL  SKETCH    5f 


LIST  OF  TABLES 


Table  Pag 

1.  Means  of  heights  (cm)  of  tobacco  plants  measured  on  four 
different  dates  after  inoculation  on  October  ih^  I966   15 

2.  Means  .of  tobacco  leaf  and  root  veights  (g)  and  the  popu- 
lations of  nematodes  128  days  after  inoculation  on 

October  l^t,  I966  .  .*  I6 

3.  Means  of  plant  heights  (cn)  and  green  leaf  and  root  weights 
(g)  of  tobacco,  and  the  teminal  populations  of  nematodes, 

80  days  after  inoculation  on  J\xn.e.  I6,  I967  I8 

h.    Means  of  plant  heights  (cm),  green  leaf  and  root  weights  (g) 
of  tobacco  and  terminal  populations  of  nematodes,  TO  days 
after  inoculation  on  June  3,  196?  20 

5.    Means  of  plant  heights  (cm),  green  leaf  and  fresh  root 
weights  (g)  of  tobacco,  and  terminal  populations  of 
nematodes,  k2  days  after  inoculation  on  July  28,  I968  22 


o.    Comparison  of  terminal  populations  of  Helicotylenchus 

dihystera  inoculated  alone  and  in  combinations  as  indicated.  .  kO 

7.  Comparison  of  terminal  populations  of  Rotylenchulus 

reniformis  inoculated  alone  and  in  combinations  as  indicated  ,  1+1 

8.  Comparison  of  the  terminal  populations  of  Tylenchorhynchus 
claytoni  inociaated  alone  and  in  combinations  as  indicated  .  .  2+3 

9.  Comparison  of  the  terminal  populations  of  Helicotylenchus  " 
dihystera  inoculated  alone  and  in  combination  with  • 
Rotylenchulus  reniformis  and  T^'lenchorhynchus  claytoni  ....  hk 

10.  Comparison  of  terminal  populations  of  Rotylenchulus       ,     ,   ■  ^ '."  ^ 
reniformis  inoculated  alone  and  in  combination  with              '  ' 
Helicotylenchus  dihystera  and  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni.  .  .  .  1»5 

11.  Comparison  of  terminal  populations  of  Tylenchorhynchus 
claytoni  inoculated  alone  and  in  combination  with 
Helicotylenchus  dihystera  and  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  ....  1+6 


-  IV  - 


I  • 


LIST  OF  FIGURES 


Page 

Figure  '  t 

1.  Photomicrographs  of  adult  females  of  Rotylenchulus  i 
reniformis.    A,  eelvorm  shape;  B,  C,  D,  developing 

stages;  E,  mature  kidney  shape.    F,  an  enlargement 

of  t  shoving  vulva  (v).    Didelphic  reflexed  ovarxes 

are  not  discernible  in  this  photograph  

2.  A,  Cross  section  view  of  a  tobacco  root  from  an 
uninoculated  plant.    B,  An  enlarged  viev  of  A  

3.  A-D,  Photomicrographs  of  cross  sections  of  tobacco 
roots  infected  vith  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  shoving  _ 
various  shapes  of  hypertrophied^ cells  in  the  pericyclic 
region  surrounding  vascular  cylinders   

U.    Photomicrograph  of  two  females  of  Rotylenchulus. 

X^r^^  formis  feeding  in  the  same  area  of  a  tobacco  root  

5.  Cross  section  view  of  a  tobacco  root  infected  with 
Rotylenchulus  reniformis  showing  the  nematode  head 
positioned  near  the  hypertrophied  pericycle   

28 

6.  An  enlarged  view  of  a  portion  of  Fig.  5   

T.    A,  Cross  section  view  of  a  tobacco  root  infected 

with  Rotylenchulus  reniformis   

8.  A,  View  of  a  longitudinal  section  of  tobacco  root 
infected  by  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  showing 
hypertrophied  cells  and  enlarged  nuclei   

9.  A-F,  Photomicrographs  of  serial  sections  of  a  tobacco 
root  infected  by  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  showing  the 
development  of  hypertrophied  cells  (arrows)  which 
apparently  originated  in  the  pericycle  

10.    Photomicrograph  of  a  tobacco  root  showing  two  nuclei 
(a)  of  a  hypertrophied  cell  which  had  been  fed  upon 
by  Rotylenchulus  reniformis    ^ 


11.    Comparison  of  terminal  population  levels  of  three 
nematode  species  at  different  levels  of  inoculum 
1*2  days  after  inoculation  


-  V  - 


Abstract  of  Dissertation  Presented  to  the  Graduate  Council 
in  Partial  Fulfillment  of  the  Requirements  for  the  Degree  of 

Doctor  of  Philosophy 


PATHOGENICITY  OF  THE  IMEMATODFS  P0TYLENCHULU5  RENIFORMIS, 
HELICOTYLEITCHUS  DIHYvSTERA.  MID  TYLENCHORHYiNCHUS  CLAYTONI 

TO  SHADE  TOBACCO 


Savart  Ratanavorabhan 
March,  I969 

Chairman:  Dr.  Grover  C.  Smart,  Jr. 

Major  Department:  Entomology  and  Nematology 

Helicotylenchus  dihystera,  Rotylenchulus  reniformis ,  and 
Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni  are  plant  parasitic  nematodes  frequently 
encountered  in  shade-grown  tobacco  fields  in  North  Florida.  Pathogeni- 
city experiments  vere  conducted  in  the  greenhouse  using  each  species 
alone  and  in  all  combinations  with  the  other  tvo  species  at  different 
inoculum  levels.    T.  claytoni  significantly  retarded  the  root  system 
of  shade-grown  tobacco  variety  'Dixie  Shade'  with  an  exposure  period  of 
128  days.    However,  height  and  yield  of  inoculated  plants  were  not 
affected  by  root  retardation.    Smaller  root  systems  of  plants  were 
always  accompanied  by  some  discoloration  and  shriveled  appearance  of 
roots.    At  exposure  periods  of  80,  70,  or  k?.  days  at  inoculum  levels 
comparable  to  those  used  for  1?8  days' exposure,  root  retardation  by  T. 
.^^-^-y^^"^  ^i^-  "O't  °<^cur.    H.  dihystera  and  R.  reniformis  inoculated 
alone  or  in  all  combinations  at  any  inoculum  level  did  not  affect  T>lant 


-  vi  - 


growth.    At  any  given  time  of  exposure  T.  claytoni  inoculated  to  tobacco 
alone  or  in  combination  vith  the  other  species  reproduced  at  a  greater 
rate  than  did  the  other  nematodes.    Terminal  populations  increased 
several  times  over  the  inoculum.    Terminal  populations  of  H.  dihystera 
and  R_.  reniformis  inoculated  alone  or  in  combination  vere  in  most  cases 
greater  than  the  inoculum,  but  nvmbers  were  not  as  great  as  were  terminal 
populations  of  T.  claytoni.    Inoculation  with  1,500  specimens  each  of 
T,  claytoni ,  _H.  dihystera,  and       reniformis  resulted  in  significantly 
fewer  numbers  of  R.  reniformis  U2  days  after  inoculation  than  when  1,500 
specimens  of  R^.  reniformis  were  inoculated  alone.    Similarly,  inocxila- 
tion  with  1,500  specimens  each  of  If.  dihystera,  R^,  reniformis ,  and  T.. 
claytoni  resulted  in  fewer  numbers  of  T.  claytoni  h2  days  after  inocvila- 
tion  than  when  1,500  specimens  of  T.  claytoni  were  inoculated  alone. 

Histopathological  studies  of  tobacco  roots  infected  by  R.  reniformis 
revealed  that  eelworm-shaped  females  penetrated  tobacco  roots  near  the 
root  tips  to  initiate  infection.    The  parasites  penetrated  the  epidermis, 
cortical  parenchyma,  and  endodermis  and  fed  in  the  pericyclic  region. 
Only  the  stylet  penetrated  into  peri cycle  cells.    Hypertrophy  and  en- 
largement of  nuclei  in  the  pericyclic  region  extended  from  the  cell 
where  a  nematode  stylet  was  inserted  to  adjacent  pericyclic  cells.  Cyto- 
plasmic content  of  hypertrophied  cells  stained  darker  than  uninfected 
surrounding  cells.    The  above-ground  portions  of  parasitized  plants 
exhibited  no  symptoms. 


-  vii  - 


imODUCTION 

Records  maintained  at  the  Department  of  Entomology  and  Nematology, 
University  of  Florida,  Gainesville  and  the  North  Florida  Experiment  Station, 
Quincy,  shov  that  plant  parasitic  nematodes  of  the  genera  Helicotylenchus , 
Rotylenchulus  and  Tylenchorhynchus  are  frequently  encountered  in  shade-grown 
tobacco  areas  in  North  Florida.    Experiments  at  Quincy  indicated  that  yields 
were  increased  and  a  better  quality  of  tobacco  was  produced  when  nematicides 
were  used  (Tappan  and  Kincaid,  1962  and  196^+).    Records  also  revealed  that 
Helicotylenchus  dihystera  (Cobb)  Sher  (syn.  H.  nannus  Steiner ) ,  definitely 
affected  crop  growth.    This  parasite  damaged  shade-grown  tobacco  roots  re- 
ducing plant  height,  yield,  and  quality  of  the  tobacco  (Tappan  and  Kincaid, 
1963).    The  reniform  nematode,  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  Linford  and  Oliveira, 
has  been  suspected  of  reducing  yield  and  quality  of  shade-grown  tobacco. 
Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni  Steiner ,  though  not  reported  in  the  Gainesville 
and  Quincy  records  as  a  pathogen  of  tobacco,  hsis  been  reported  as  a  pest  of 
tobacco  in  other  areas. 

The  purposes  of  these  investigations  were  to  determine  the  effects  of 
Helicotylenchus  dihystera,  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  and  Tylenchorhynchus 
claytoni  on  shade-grown  tobacco  variety  'Dixie  Shade'  by  using  each  species 
alone  and  in  all  combinations  with  the  other  species,  and  to  investigate  the 
histopathology  of  R.  reniformis  on  tobacco. 


1 


LITERATURE  REVIEW 


Members  of  the  nematode  genus  Helicotylenchus  are  encoxmtered  frequently 
in  the  roots  and  surroxmding  soil  of  many  host  plants.    The  parasites  have 
•been  found  repeatedly  in  soil  samples  from  turf  grasses,  ornamental  plants 
and  field  crops  by  various  workers  (Perry  et  al . ,  1959;  Taylor,  I960; 
McGlohon  et  al . ,  196I;  Springer,  196^*;  Roman,  1965;  Sher,  1966).    K.  dihystera 
is  the  predominant  species  found  in  shade-grown  tobacco  areas  of  North  Florida 
(Tappan  and  Kincaid,  1963),  yet  little  is  known  about  its  pathogenicity  to 
tobacco. 

Sledge  (1956)  studied  the  pathogenicity  of  H.  dihystera  to  certain 
varieties  of  com  and  found  that  the  nematode  multiplied  readily  but  caused 
little  damage.    The  symptoms  included  those  of  stunting  and  some  root  necrosis 
at  high  inocxilum  levels.    Minton  and  Cairns  (1957)  showed  that  H.  dihystera 
decreased  root  production  by  'Ogden'  soybean.    However,  seed  yields  of  the 
infected  and  control  plants  were  not  significantly  different.    H.  dihystera 
was  reported  to  be  associated  with  gardenia  decline  by  Konicek  and  Jensen 
(1961).    The  decline  plants  showed  stunting,  yellowing,  premature  dropping 
of  leaves,  failure  to  form  flower  buds,  premature  dropping  of  buds,  and 
eventual  death  of  plants.    Ruehle  (I966)    reported  that  H.  dihystera  para- 
sitized  and  reproduced  on  six  species  of  pine  seedlings  native  to  the  south- 
eastern United  States.    However,  effects  of  this  parasite  on  the  pine  seedlings 
were  not  determined. 

Pathogenicity  of  a  few  other  species  of  the  genus  have  been  studied  by 
Perry  et_ al .  (1959).    They  demonstrated  that  H.  digonicus  Perry  and,  to  a 

-  2  - 


-  3  - 

lesser  extent^  K.  nicrolo"bus  Perry  [  =  H.  pseudorobustus  (Steiner)  Golden] 
and  H.  pimilus  Perry  [  =  Rotylenchus  punilus  (Perry)  Sher]  parasitized  roots 
of  common  Kentucky  blue  grass,  Poa  pratensis  L.,  and  produced  a  condition 
called  "summer  dormancy". 

The  reniform  nematode,  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  vas  described  from  roots 
of  cowpea,  Vigna  sinensis  Endl. ,  in  Hawaii  (Linford  and  Oliveira,  19^0). 
Since  then  the  species  has  been  reported  to  occur  in  various  tropical  and 
semi tropical  areas  of  the  world  and  in  the  southern  United  States  (Smith, 
19liO;  Smith  and  Taylor,  19^1;  Steiner,  19^9;  Martin,  1955;  Peacock,  1956; 
Timm,  1956;  Minton  and  Kopper,  1959;  Thorne,  196l;  Sasser  et  al . ,  1962; 
Lambe  and  Home,  1963;  Swarup  et_  al , ,  196?;  Fassuliotis  and  Rau,  1967;  and 
Dasgupta  et  al. ,  1968).    This  species  attacks  various  host  plants  (Linford 
and  Yap,  19^0;  Peacock,  1956;  Luc  and  de  Guiran,  I96O;  Birchfield  and 
Brister,  1962;  Ayala  and  Ramirez,  196i;).    Among  the  economic  crops  are  cotton, 
sweet  potato,  pineapple,  tomato  and  tobacco. 

The  importance  of  R_.  reniformis  was  recognized  when  Neal  (195^)  reported 
that  the  presence  of  the  reniform  nematode  increased  the  incidence  of 
Fusarium  wilt  of  cotton  in  the  wilt  susceptible  varieties.    Birchfield  and 
Jones  (1961)  stated  that  R.  reniformis  was  found  associated  with  cotton 
failures  distributed  over  2,000  to  2,500  acres  in    Louisiana.    This  parasite 
was  associated  with  severe  disease  symptoms  of  dwarfing,  premature  decay  with 
loss  of  secondary  roots,  and  death  of  young  cotton  plants.    These  conditions 
resulted  in  poor  stands,  "grassy"  areas  in  the  fields,  and  ultimate  yield 
reductions  of  Uo  to  60  per  cent.    Jones  et_  al .  (1959)  reported  that  the 
infestation  of  R.  reniformis  at  the  rate  of  320  specimens  per  1+73  ml  (one 
pint)  of  soil  caused  a  reduction  in  the  green  weights  of  cotton  plants  by 
12.6  per  cent,  a  21.3  per  cent  reduction  in  total  boll  weights  and  20.7  per 
cent  reduction  in  number  of  bolls.    Cotton  seedling  growth  was  reduced  when 


_  It  « 


roots  were  parasitized  by  R_.  reniformis  according  to  Brodie  and  Cooper  (196^4). 
Minton  et  al.     (I96U)  reported  that  R_.  reniformis  reduced  emergence,  plant 
height,  and  yield  of  cotton,  sind  hastened  crop  maturity.    They  also  noted 
that  the  incidence  of  Fusarium  wilt  of  cotton  was  significantly  increased  by 
the  presence  of  R_.  reniformis.    Kost-parasite  relationships  of  R_.  reniformis 
on  cotton  were  studied  by  Birchfield  (19^2) .    He  found  that  young  females 
initiated  infection  by  extending  the  anterior  portion  of  their  bodies 
through  the  epidermis  and  cortical  parenchyma  to  feed  in  phloem  tissues  of 
young  roots.    Phloem  cells  near  the  feeding  site  of  the  nematode  stained 
darker  thsui  normal  tissues;  damage  to  the  phloem  extended  several  cells 
along  the  eixis  of  the  root.    Birchfield  concluded  that  necrosis  in  the  phloem 
and  parenchyma  apparently  resulted  in  severe  root  "pruning"  of  seedlings  and 
subseq^uent  dwarfing  of  cotton. 


In  Florida,  R_.  reniformis  was  first  reported  by  Steiner  (I9U9)  on 
tomato  and  coffee  weed  (Cassia  tora  L^. )  from  Quincy.    Later,  the  parasite 
was  found  parasitizing  roots  of  mango  tree  (Manr^ifera  indica  L. )  on  the 


groxinds  of  the  University  of  Florida  Subtropical  Experiment  Station  at 
Homestead  according  to  Van  Weerdt  et_  al .  (1959).    However,  the  damage  by 
R.  reniformis  to  mango  in  Florida  has  not  been  investigated. 

Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni ,  the  tobacco  stunt  nematode,  was  described  by 
Steiner  (1937)  from  specimens  collected  around  and  in  the  roots  of  stunted 
tobacco  plants  growing  near  Florence,  South  Carolina.    Graham  (195U)  fovmd 
that  species  in  67  per  cent  of  a  series  of  soil  samples  taken  from  tobacco 
fields  in  Eastern  South  Carolina.    He  also  stated  that  the  species  was  en- 


countered frequently  in  soil  samples  from  cotton  and  com  fields.    As  an 


ectoparasite  of  tobacco,  Graham  reported  that  T.  claytoni  caused  stunting 
of  the  tobacco  plant  and  a  much  retarded  root  system  as  compared  with  normal 


growth  in  nematode- free  soil.    Graham  further  stated  that  the  roots  did  not 
show  definite  symptoms  "but  became  shriveled  and  sparsely  developed.  Drolsom 
and  Moore  (1955)  reported  that  T.  claytoni  was  one  of  the  principal  plant 
parasitic  nematodes  foxind  in  tobacco  fields  in  North  Carolina  where  stunting 
of  plants  occurred.    Holdeman  (1956)  stated  that  the  presence  of  T.  claytoni 
attacking  the  roots  of  wilt  susceptible  tobacco  variety  'Oxford  I-I8I,' 
greatly  increased  the  incidence  of  wilt  caused  by  Fusarium  oxysporim. 
Krusberg  (1959)  reported  that  T.  claytoni  completed  its  life  cycle  in  about 
one  month  on  alfalfa  roots  growing  on  nutrient  agar.    He  also  found  that  males 
are  necessary  for  reproduction.    Root  systems  of  tobacco  growing  in  pots  were 
considerably  retarded  by  large  populations  of  T_.  claytoni.    No  nematode  injury 
to  the  roots  of  tobacco  variety  'Dixie  Bright  101'  was  observed.    Host  range 
studies,  including  1*1  plant  varieties,  indicated  that  the  tobacco  variety 
'Bottom  Special'  is  the  most  suitable  host.    Reproduction  of  the  nematode 
was  best  at  29.1+°  -  35.0°  C  on  tobacco  and  at  21.1°  -  26.6°  C  on  wheat. 

Nelson  (1956)  tested  several  corn  hybrid  lines  in  the  greenhouse  against 
T.  claytoni  and  found  that  at  high  population  levels  root  and  shoot  weights 
of  plants  were  reduced, 

Brodie  and  Cooper  (1961*)  reported  that  T.  claytoni  reproduced  in  the 
presence  of  cotton  seedling  roots  but  did  not  cause  excessive  root  injury  or 
measurable  retardation  in  gro'^h  of  seedlings. 

Pathogenicity  of  T.  claytoni  on  turf  grasses  was  investigated  by  Troll 
and  Rhode  (I966).    They  observed  the  parasite  feeding  on  the  roots  of  annual 
rye  grass,  creeping  red  fescue,  and  Kentucky  blue  grass  but  root  injury  was 
not  discernible.    Shoots  of  the  three  grasses  inoculated  with  T.  claytoni 
were  not  affected  by  the  nematode.    The  lower  dry  weights  of  roots  and  shoots 
of  inoculated  plants  compared  with  non-inoculated  controls  indicated  that 


-  6  - 

T.  claytonj  was  pathogenic  to  creeping  red  fescue  (Festuca  rubra  L. ) 
Sumner  (196T)  reported  that  T^.  clnytoni  was  one  of  the  predominant  stylet- 
bearing  nematodes  found  in  Kentucky  blue  grass  lawns  in  Lincoln,  Nebraska. 
However,  attempts  to  demonstrate  its  pathogenicity  on  blue  grass  in  green- 
house and  laboratory  experiments  were  unsuccessful. 

■        dtiytoni  is  also  found  frequently  in  forest  tree  nuseries.  Hopper 
(1958)  reported  that  population  levels  of  1,500  to  2,000  specimens  per 
^73  ml  of  soil  caused  severe  injury  to  seedlings  of  slash  pine,  Pinus 
elliottii  Engelm.    He  described  the  symptoms  as  ranging  from  green-,  yellow-, 
and  brown-colored  seedlings  to  dead  seedlings.    However,  low  infestation  of 
T.  claytonj  did  not  appear  to  affect  pine  seedlings.    Sutherland  and  Adams 
(196^*)  reported  that  T.  claytoni  was  parasitic  on  but  not  pathogenic  to  red 
pine  seedlings  (Pinus  resinosa  Ait.).    Ruehle  (1966)  established  that  T_, 
claytoni  is  parasitic  on  loblolly,  longleaf,  pond,  sand  slash,  shortleaf, 
and  Virginia  pines. 

Sher  (1958),  and  Barker  and  Worf  (1966)  reported  that  parasitism  by 
T.  cla:/-boni  resulted  in  retarded  growth  of  azalea  plants.    Barker  and  Worf 
also  found  that  T_.  claytoni  accentuates  the  appearance  of  foliage  chlorosis 
of  azalea  plants. 


MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 
Pathogenicity 

General  Methods 

In  December,  I965,  soil  infested  with  moderate  numbers  of  Rotylenehulus 
reniformis ,  Helicotylenchus  dihy stera ,  and  lov  numbers  of  Tylenchorhynchus 
claytoni  vas  collected  from  the  North  Florida  Experiment  Station  at  Quincy, 
Florida.    The  soil  was  processed  using  the  elutriation  technique  (Seinhorst, 
1956)  and  a  modified  Baermann  funnel  technique  (Christie  and  Perry,  1951). 
Larvae ,  eelworm-shaped  females  and  males  of  R_.  reniformis  were  isolated 
individually  and  randomly  and  each  of  several  pots  were  inoculated  with  a 
total  of  100  specimens.    The  pots  were  divided  into  five  groups  and  each  group 
was  planted  to  bean  (Phaseolus  vulgaris  Savi . ) ,  cotton  (Gossypivim  hirsutum 
L. ) ,  sweet  potato  (impomoea  batatus  Lam.),  tobacco  (Nicotiana  tebacvur.  L. ) 
or  tomato  (Lycopersicon  esculentm  Mill.).    Large  numbers  were  recovered  from 
tomato  and  thus  this  host  was  selected  for  the  increase  and  maintenance  of 
populations  of  R.  reniformis . 

One  hundred  gravid  females  (males  are  not  known  to  occur)  of  H.  dihystera 
were  placed  in  15-cm  plastic  pots  and  either  tobacco  or  tomato  seedlings 
were  planted.    Reproduction  was  greater  on  tomato  and  thus  this  host  was  used 
to  maintain  populations  of  H.  dihystera  also.    This  soil  did  not  contain  suf- 
ficient numbers  of  T.  claytoni  to  establish  colonies. 

In  Jiine,  I966,  soil  containing  large  numbers  of  T.  claytoni  was  collected 
near  Quincy,  Florida.    The  samples  were  processed  by  the  elutriation  technique 

-  T  - 


-  8  - 


(Seinhorst,  1956)  and  large  numbers  vere  recovered.    Kales  and  females  vere 
individually  isolated  and  each  of  several  pots  vaB    inoculated  vith  a  total 
of  200  specimens.    A  tobacco  seedling  then  was  planted  in  each  pot  and  after 
three  months  populations  of  the  parasites  increased  several  times  the  original 
inoculm. 

All  nematode  colonies  vcrc  maintained  in  an  air-conditioned  greenhouse 
at  26+  h°C,    About  28-1*2  days  prior  to  initiating  the  experiments,  tobacco 
seeds  were  sown  in  a  flat  containing  autoclaved  soil.    The  flats  of  seedlings 
were  maintained  in  the  greenhouse  and  received  fertilizer  and  water  as  needed. 

The  soil  used  to  colonize  the  nematodes  and  used  in  Experiment  I  was 
collected  from  the  North  Florida  Experiment  Station,  autoclaved  at  18  psi  for 
30  minutes,  and  allowed  to  aerate  a  few  days  before  use.    Then  2,000  ml  was 
placed  in  each  of  several  15-cm  plastic  pots. 

Experiment  I.   -  ' 

This  experiment  was  initiated  on  October  14,  1966,  and  terminated  on 
February  20,  196?.    Tobacco  seedlings  were  36  days  old  at  the  time  of 
inoculation.    The  following  nine  treatments  for  this  experiment  were  repli- 


cated fovr  times: 

1.  Inoculated  with  500H^ 

2.  "           "  500T 

3.  tt  t,  1,000H 
^.             "           "  1,000T 

5.  "           "  500H  + 

500T 

6.  "           "  2,000H 

7.  "           "  2,000T 


8.    Inoculated  \  ./  h  !  ; 


1,000H  + 
1,000T 


9. 


Uninocxilated 


a, 


'H  =  Helicotyle;    -.us  dihystera,  T  =  Tylr..\ohorhynchus  claytoni 


Pot  arrangement  vas  a  completely  randomized  block  design.  Specimens 
for  inoculations  were  obtained  from  the  greenhouse  colonies  described  above. 
Nematodes  were  extracted  from  the  soil  by  using  an  elutriation  technique 
(Seinhorst,  1956).    The  specimens  were  used  within  U8  hours  after  isolation 
from  the  soil.    Nematodes  in  all  treatments  were  hand-picked  with  the  aid 
of  a  dissecting  microscope. 

Inoculation  was  performed  by  adding  the  requisite  numbers  of  nematodes 
as  a  water  suspension  into  a  hole  made  in  the  soil  in  a  pot,  then  a  tobacco 
seedling  was  planted  in  the  same  hole  and  water  was  added.    Pots  then  were 
randomly  arranged  on  a  greenhouse  bench.    A  liquid  fertilizer  solution  (Orthci^ 
12-6-6)  vas  applied  every  two  weeks,  and  plants  were  watered  as  required. 
Plants  heights  were  recorded  at  monthly  intervals,  and  "ripe"  leaves 
were  primed  on  three  different  dates  and  the  green  weights  recorded. 
Upon  termination  of  the  experiment  the  remaining  leaves  were  primed  and 
weighed.    Weights  of  leaves  at  the  three  different  primings  and  at  the  termin- 
ation of  the  experiment  were  combined.    The  stalks  then  were  cut  off  at  the 
soil  line  and  plant  heights  were  measured.    After  the  stalks  were  cut  the 
roots  were  removed  from  the  soil,  washed  gently  in  r\mning  water,  blotted 
with  paper  towels,  and  weighed.    The  roots  then  were  examined  for  nematode 
injury  with  the  aid  of  a  dissecting  microscope.    The  soil  was  removed  from 
the  pots,  thoroughly  mixed,  and  two  100  ml  samples  were  processed  by  using 
a  rapid  centrifugal- flotation  technique  (Jenkins,  196h).    The  nematodes  re- 
covered were  rinsed  into  a  graduate  cylinder  and  enough  water  was  added  to 


-  10  - 


make  250  ml.    Specimens  were  counted  in  five  aliquot s  of  10  ml  each  and 
populations  for  each  sample  determined.    An  average  vas  taken  of  the  tvo 
samples  and  the  numbers  of  nematodes  per  pot  calculated. 

Experiments  II,  III,  and  IV 

Soil  used  in  these  experiments  vas  collected  from  a  field  near  the 
North  Florida  Experiment  Station.    This  soil  was  fumigated  with  methyl  bromide 
at  the  rate  of  two  pounds  per  cubic  yard  for  hB  hours  and  allowed  to  aerate 
in  an  open  shade  area  for  two  weeks.    Then  2,000  ml  were  placed  in  each  of 
several  15-cm  plastic  pots.    At  this  time  sor.e  of  the  soil  was  processed  for 
nematodes  and  none  was  found. 

Experiment  II,  a  repetition  of  Experiment  I,  was  initiated  on  Jvme  l6, 
1967,  and  terminated  on  September  U,  I967.    The  tobacco  seedlings  were  hi  days 
old  when  transplanted  and  inoculated. 

Experiment  III  vas  initiated  on  June  3,  19^7,  and  terminated  on  August 
12,  1967.    The  seedlings  used  were  28  days  old.    The  15  treatments  each 
replicated  four  times  were  as  follow: 


1.  Inoculated  with  500H 

2.  "  "  5OOR 

3.  "  "  5OOT 
I*.  "           "  1,000H 

5.  "  "  1,000R 

6.  "  "  1,000T 

7.  "  "  5OOH  + 

5OOR 

8.  "  "  50OR  + 

5OOT 

9.  "  "  5OOH  + 

5OOT 


10.    Inoculated  with 


500H  + 
500R  + 
50OT 


11. 


II 


n 


1,500H 


12. 


n 


M 


1,500R 


13. 


n 


ft 


1,500T 


n 


n 


1,500H  + 
1,500R  + 
1,500T 


15.  Uninoculated 

s-H  =  Helicotylenchus  dihystera,  R  =  Rotylenchulus  rerxifornis, 
T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni 

Experiment  IV,  a  repetition  of  Experiment  III,  was  initiated  on 
July  28,  1968,  and  terminated  on  September  8,  I968.    Tobacco  seedlings  were 
1+2  days  old  at  the  time  of  inoculation.  . 

The  pot  arrangements  in  these  three  experiments  were  completely 
randomised  block  designs.    Nematode  specimens  for  inoculations  were  obtained 
from  the  greenhouse  colonies  described  above.    Specimens  were  isolated  from 
the  soil  by  using  either  an  elutriation  technique  (Seinhorst,  1956)  or  a 
modified  Baermann  funnel  technique  (Christie  amd  Perry,  1951)  or  both.  The 
specimens  were  used  within  36  hours  after  isolated  from  the  soil.    To  obtain 
the  ntmbers  of  specimens  needed  for  inoculation,  the  number  of  specimens  in 
one  ml  of  water  was  determined  and  the  correct  number  of  milliliters  of  water 
was  used  for  each  treatment.    Inoculations  and  maintenances  were  performed 
as  previously  described  for  Experiment  I.    On  termination  of  the  experiments 
leaves  were  primed  and  weighed.    The  stalks  were  cut  off  at  the  soil  line  and 
plant  heights  were  measured.    The  soil  and  roots  were  removed  from  the  individ- 
ual pots  and  placed  in  a  10-liter  plastic  pail  to  which  5,000  ml  of  water  were 


-  12  - 

added.    The  roots  vere  moved  about  in  the  water  to  separate  them  from  the 
soil  after  vhich  they  were  removed  from  the  pail,  vashed  in  running  vater, 
blotted  with  paper  towels,  weighed  and  excmined.    The  water  and  soil  in  each 
pail  was  roiled,  an  aliquot  of  1,000  ml  taken  immediately  and  then  processed 
using  a  modified  Baermann  funnel  technique  (Christie  and  Perry,  1951)  for 
Experiments  II  and  III,  and  a  rapid  centrifugal-flotation  techniq.ue  (Jenkins, 
196k)  for  Experiment  IV.    The  specimens  recovered  were  counted  by  the  aid  of 
a  dissecting  microscope  and  the  numbers  of  specimens  in  each  pot  were  ccnputed. 
Females  of  R.  reniformis  which  were  embedded  in  the  roots  were  not  included 
in  the  computations. 

Histopathology  of  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  on  Tobacco  Roots 

On  July  U,  1968,  thirty  day-old  seedlings  of  the  shade-grown  tobacco 
variety  'Dixie  Shade'  were  placed  in  ih-cm  plastic  petri  dishes  painted 
black.    The  plants  were  placed  through  slits  made  in  the  edge  of  the  petri 
dishes  with  stems  and  leaves  outside.    At  the  point  of  exit,  the  stems  were 
wrapped  in  cotton.    Nematode  inoculum  composed  of  a  mixture  of  larvae,  males 
and  eelwona-shaped  females  of  R_.  reniformis  was  pipetted  onto  the  roots  which 
then  were  covered  with  autoclaved  builder's  white  sand  and  watered  with  rain 
water  which  had  been  collected  for  this  purpose.    Uninoculated  plants  served 
as  controls .    Plants  were  watered  alternately  with  rain  water  and  Hoagland 
solution  as  required  by  using  polyethylene  squeeze  bottles.    The  experimental 
plants  were  kept  in  a  growth  room  at  approximately  2T°C.    A  l6-hour  photo 
period  was  used. 

One  month  after  inoculation  the  plants  were  removed  from  the  petri  dishes 
and  the  roots  were  examined  for  nematode  infection  and  injury.    Some  of  the 


-  13  - 


inoculated  roots  were  stained  in  acid  fuchsin-lactophenol  and  cleared  in 
lactophenol  (McBeth  et  al . ,  19^1)-    Sections  of  roots  2-3  cm  in  length  in 
vhich  saccate  females  were  embedded  and  comparalDle  sections  of  iininfected 
roots  were  placed  for  at  least  2h  hours  in  Craf  III  fixative  (Sass,  1958) 
containing  chromic  acid  (30  ml  of  one  per  cent),  acetic  acid  (20  ml  of 
10  per  cent),  formaldehyde  (lO  ml  of  37. 5  per  cent)  and  vater  {hO  ml).  They 
were  dehydrated  "by  a  normal  butyl  alcohol  series,  embedded  in  'Tissuemat' 
(60°C.  m.p.)  and  sliced  in  cross-  and  logitudinal-sections ,  10  micron  thick, 
with  a  rotary  microtome.    Sections  were  affixed  to  glass  slides  with  Haupts 
adhesive  and  stained  using  Johansen's  quadruple  stain  method  (Johansen,  19^0). 
The  stained  sections  were  mounted  in  'Permount'  and  examined  with  the  aid  of 
a  compound  microscope. 


RESULTS 


Pathogenicity 

Experiment  I 

Plant  growth  was  almost  uniform  throughout  the  experiment  and  no 
symptoms  on  the  above-ground  plant  portions  were  observed  at  any  time. 
Data  on  plant  heights  taken  at  30,  73,  90  and  128  (terminal)  days  after 
inoculation  showed  no  significant  differences  between  inoculated  and  un- 
inoculated  plants  (Table  l).    Green  weights  of  leaves  taken  at  three  dif- 
ferent primings  and  at  the  termination  of  the  experiment  were  combined.  An 
analysis  of  variance  of  the  data  on  leaf  weights  disclosed  no  significant 
differences  between  the  inoculated  and  uninoculated  plants  (Table  2).  An 
analysis  of  variance  of  the  data  on  root  weights  disclosed  highly  significant 
differences  between  treatments  (Table  2).    Duncan's  multiple  range  test  re- 
vealed that  the  root  weights  of  the  uninoculated  plants  were  significantly 
higher  at  the  one  per  cent  level  than  those  of  plants  inoculated  with  each 
of  the  three  population  levels  of  T.  claytoni .    Root  weights  of  the 
uninoculated  plants  were  also  significantly  higher  at  the  five  per  cent 
level  than  those  of  plants  inoculated  with  500  specimens  of  K.  dihystera  + 
500  specimens  of  T.  claytoni .    Differences  were  not  significant  between  the 
roots  of  uninoculated  plants  and  those  of  plants  inoculated  with  1,000  and 
2,000  specimens  of  H.  dihystera  or  1,000  specimens  of  H.  dihystera  +  1,000 
specimens  of  T.  claytoni » 


-  Ih  - 


Table  1. — Means  of  heights  (cm)  of  tobacco  plants  measured  on  four  dif' 
ferent  dates  after  inoculation  on  October  lU,  1966. 


Treatments 

Days  after 

inoculation 

30* 

,  Y3* 

90* 

1. 

500H^ 

26.0 

56.0 

77.2 

113.5 

2. 

50  OT 

27.5 

57.2 

77.5 

113.7 

3. 

1,000H 

25.2 

55.2 

76.2 

112.7 

k. 

l.OOOT 

29.2 

53.7 

71.7 

103.7 

5. 

5OOH  + 

118.5 

5OOT 

27.0 

58.7 

80.7 

6. 

2,000H 

31.2 

60.2 

81.0 

-  120.2 

7. 

2, COOT 

26.7 

52.7 

72.5 

101.2 

8. 

l.OOOH  + 

1,OOOT 

29.2 

55.7 

-  73.2 

102.2 

9. 

Uninoculated 

29.5 

61.0 

81+. 0 

122.2 

*  =  Differences  not  significant  at  the  5  per  cent  level  of  probability. 
^  =  Heli cotylenchus  dihystera,    T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni 


-  16  - 

Table  2. — Means  of  tobacco  leaf  and  root  veights  (g)  and  the  populations 
of  nematodes  128  days  after  inoculation  on  October  ll+,  I966. 


Treatments 

b 

Nematodes 

Leaves^ 

Roots 

Populations 

Increas( 

1. 

500H*^ 

80.2 

28.9^ 

3,3^5 

6.5X 

2. 

5OOT 

87.2 

28.1, 

29.9^" 
32.9^^ 

58,000 

ll6x 

3. 
k. 

1,000H 
l.OOOT 

85.3 
83.6 

1^,250 
117,875 

^X 

118X 

5. 

5OOK  + 

86.9 

1,995 

kx 

5OOT 

93,625 

187X 

6. 

2,000H 

83.6 

10,830 

5.5X 

7. 

2,000T 

87.9 

211,500  . 

105X 

8. 

1,000H  + 

86.2 

!+,337 

hx 

l.OOOT 

115,000 

115X 

9. 

Uninoculated 

Qk.k 

h2.f 

0 

OX 

Differences  not  significant  at  the  5  per  cent  level  of  probability- 
Differences  isgnificant  at  the  1  per  cent  level  of  probability. 
Treatment  means  having  the  same  letter  are  not  significantly 
different. 


H  =  Heli cotylenchus  dil?ystera,  T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni 


-  IT  - 


Root  systems  of  pleints  inoculated  with  T.  claytoni  exhibited  some  dis- 
coloration and  shriveled  appearances.    Well  defined  lesions  or  extensive 
root  necrosis  vere  not  observed. 

In  every  case  the  number  of  nematodes  increased  over  the  initial 
inoculum.    The  numbers  of  H.  dihystera  increased  as  follows:    on  plants 
inoculated  with  500  specimens  about  six  and  one-half  times,  with  1,000 
specimens  about  four  times,  and  with  2,000  specimens  about  five  and  one-half 
times.    The  nmbers  of  T.  claytoni  increased  as  follows:    on  those  plants 
inoculated  with  500  specimens  about  ll6  times,  with  1,000  specimens  about 
ll8  times  and  with  2,000  specimens  about  105  times.    Nematodes  on  those  plants 
inoculated  with  H_.  dihystera  +  T.  claytoni  increased  as  follows :    with  500 
specimens  of  each,  H_.  dihystera  increased  about  four  times  whereas  T_.  claytoni 
increased  about  18?  times;  and  with  1,000  specimens  of  each,  H.  dihystera 
increased  about  four  times  and  T.  claytoni  about  115  times  (Table  2). 

.  .  I  '  .     ,      .  iv,  . 

Experiment  II  'r  ■  .•  -■ 

^  Symptoms  of  injury  were  not  detected  during  the  experiment.  Inoculated 
and  uninoculated  plants  were  uniform  in  general  appearances  in  all  treatments 
and  plant  heights  were  not  significantly  different  (Table  3).  Green  weights 
of  the  leaves  and  weights  of  the  roots  at  termination  of  the  experiment  were 
not  significantly  greater  for  uninoculated  plants  than  for  inoci;dated  plants 
(Table  3).  Examination  of  the  root  systems  of  inoculated  plants  revealed  no 
discoloration  or  other  symptoms  of  root  injury. 

Populations  of  T.  claytoni  increased  during  the  course  of  the  experiment 
at  all  three  levels  of  inoculum.    The  nematodes  increased  about  30  times 
when  500  specimens  were  used  as  inoculum,  about  17  times  when  1,000  specimens 
were  used  and  about  10  times  when  2,000  specimens  were  used.    Numbers  of 


Table  3. — Means  of  plant  heights  (cm),  and  green  leaf  and  root  weights  (g) 
of  tobacco,  and  the  teminal  populations  of  nematodes,  80  days 
after  inoculation  on  June  l6,  I96T. 


Treatments 

Heights^ 

3» 

Weights 

Leaves 

Roots 

Nematode 
Populations 

1. 

500H^  . 

160.0 

197.6 

75.7 

257 

2. 

5OOT 

162.0 

200.2 

78.8 

15,063 

3. 

1,000H 

158.5 

190.  U 

75.lt  ' 

725 

k. 

1,000T 

171.2 

138.1 

86.9 

17,6!;8 

5. 

5OOH  + 

163.7 

197.9 

72.5 

182 

5OOT 

.  9,572 

6. 

2,000H 

161.7 

188.9 

81.8 

1,617 

7. 

2,000T 

157.7 

192.8 

69.6 

20,552 

8. 

1,000H  + 

169.5 

196.8 

81. U 

393 

1,000T 

89.1* 

17,71*1 

9. 

Uninoculated 

I6J+.7 

190.0 

0 

^  Differences  not  significant  at  the  5  per  cent  level  of  probability. 


H  =  Helicotylenchus  dihystera,  T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni 
Each  treatment  replicated  four  times. 


H.  dihystera  at  termination  of  the  experiment  averaged  fever  than  the  initial 
num'bers  in  all  cases .    In  combination  with  K_.  dihystera  >  T_.  claytoni  in- 
creased about  19  times  vhen  500  specimens  of  each  species  were  used  as 
inoculum,  and  about  I8  times  vhen  1,000  specimens  of  each  species  vere  used 
(Table  3). 

Experiment  III 

Differences  in  grovth  between  the  inocxilated  and  tininoculated  plants 
could  not  be  detected  during  the  covirse  of  the  experiment.    Symptoms  of 
injury  to  above-groimd  portions  of  the  inoculated  plants  vere  not  observed. 
The  heights,  green  veights  of  leaves  and  fresh  weights  of  roots  of  inoc\ilated 
and  iininoculated  plants  were  not  significantly  different  (Table  h) .    No  dis- 
coloration or  other  symptoms  of  root  injury  were  evident. 

Saccate  females ,  some  with  egg  masses ,  of  R.  reniformis  were  found 
embedded  in  roots  of  plants  inociilated  with  specimens  of  this  parasite. 
Malformation  or  swelling  of  the  infected  root,  at  or  near  the  feeding  sites 
were  not  observed.    Neither  necrosis  nor  lesions  were  evident. 

Final  populations  of  T^.  claytoni  in  every  case  increased  over  the 
inoculum  but  the  numbers  of  H.  dihystera  and  R.  reniformis  decreased  whether 
inoc^llated  alone  or  in  combination  (Table  h) . 

Experiment  IV 

The  results  of  this  experiment  were  very  similar  to  those  of  Experiment 
III,  differing  only  in  the  final  populations  of  the  parasites.    Symptoms  of 
damage  to  the  above-ground  plant  parts  due  to  nematodes  were  not  observed. 
Data  on  plant  heights,  green  weights  of  leaves  and  fresh  veights  of  roots 
revealed  no  significant  differences  betveen  inoculated  and  uninoculated  plants 
(Table  5). 


-to- 
llable h. — Means  of  plant  heights  (cm)  green  leaf  and  root  veights  (g)  of 
tobacco  and  terminal  populations  of  nematodes,  70  days  after 
inoculation  on  June  3,  19^1- 


Treatments 

Heights^ 

Weip;hts^ 

Leaves 

Hoots 

Kematode 
Populations 

pUUii 

1  lift  9 

1+8  Q 

175 

2 . 

xdi,  ( 

±?0.  ? 

k"^  ? 

86 

3. 

500T 

±d.ti  .d 

14  (  .  p 

P  J. 

4. 

IjOOOH 

13'+.T 

±>4.  f 

5. 

1  jUUUr! 

■l?  0 

108 

D  . 

X ,UUUi 

XcLO,  ? 

n  ^li  n 

XP'+  .  u 

k'^,  8 

8  025 

T. 

C  AnTJ  -1. 

pOOH  + 

Hp . 

X 

Ann 

U5.6 

125 

o 

u. 

CAAR  4. 

1  Sli  7 

X^H  .  1 

70 

500T 

2,1+75 

0 

CAAU  + 

ISl*  2 

52.1 

120 

500T 

1,971 

10. 

500H  + 

.130.7 

11^7.7 

I49.5 

160 

500R  + 

96 

500T 

2,752 

11. 

1,500H 

122.5 

11*2.5 

1+6.8 

388 

12. 

1,500R 

126.5 

li*5.5 

1*5.1 

130 

13. 

1,500T 

131.5 

161.7 

52.3 

13,137 

l!+. 

1,500H  + 

133.2 

151.7 

50.7 

560 

1,500R  + 

2I+7 

1,500T 

38.1 

12,271 

15. 

Uninoculated 

123.5 

153.0 

0 

*  Differences  not  significant  at  the  5  per  cent  level  of  probability. 


H  =  Helicotylenchus  dihystera,  R  =  Rotylenchulus  reniformis , 
T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni 

Each  treatment  replicated  four  times. 


-  21  - 

In.  each  case  the  average  numher  of  nematodes  on  termination  of  the 
experiment  was  greater  than  the  nimber  used  as  inoculum  (Table  5). 

Histopathology 

Adult    females  of  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  ranging  from  eelvorm  to 
kidney-shaped  (Fig.  1  A-E)  were  found  in  the  stained  tobacco  roots.    No  life 
cycle  stage  was  found  with  the  body  totally  within  a  root.    The  majority  of 
specimens  were  found  in  the  secondary  roots  with  developing  females  near  the 
root  tips  and  more  mature  kidney-shaped  females  (Fig.  1  D,  E)  some  distance 
away  from  the  root  tips.    Some  of  these  females  had  deposited  eggs  into  the 
gelatinous  matrices,  others  had  secreted  the  matrices  but  had  not  deposited 
eggs,  and  still  others  had  not  yet  secreted  the  matrix.    In  all  cases  the 
posterior  paxt  of  the  female  and  the  matrix  and  eggs  were  outside  the  roots 
(Fig.  3).    On  several  occasions  two  or  more  specimens  were  found  feeding  in 
the  same  area  (Fig.  1;),  but  this  was  not  the  usual  case. 

This  parasite  fed  in  the  stele  of  the  roots,  apparently  on  pericyclic 
cells  (Fig.  5,  6,  7  A).    The  head  was  never  found  in  the  pericycle  but 
appeared  to  remain  in  the  endodermal  region  with  the  stylet  penetrating  the 
pericyclic  cells.    Cells  fed  upon  enlarged  in  size  to  crush  cells  of  the 
stele  and  endodermis.    The  hypertrophied  pericycle  cells  in  many  cases  en- 
circled the  vascular  cylinder  (Fig.  3)  and  extended  longitudinally  15-19  cells 
along  the  root  (Fig.  8).    This  condition  was  most  often  associated  with 
females  which  had  produced  eggs.    A  lesser  number  of  cells  was  affected 
where  the  females  were  immature  (Fig.  9  A-E). 

The  enlarged  cells  stained  darker  than  other  root  cells  and  contained 
enlarged  nuclei  (Fig.  T  A,  8,  A,  B).    Affected  cells  near  the  head  of  a 


Table  5. — Means  of  plant  heights  (cm)  green  leaf  and  fresh  root  weights  (g) 
of  tobacco,  and  terminal  populations  of  nematodes,  k2  days  after 
inoculation  on  July  28,  I968. 


Treatments         Heights^   Weights^   Nematode 


Leaves 

Roots 

Populations 

1. 

5OOH 

70.7 

71.6 

27.5 

l,Ji00 

2. 

5OOR 

66.7 

72.1 

31.0 

1,356 

3. 

5OOT 

70.5 

76.0 

31.1 

19,293 

h. 

1,000H 

69.7 

72. u 

29.5 

2,8U3 

5. 

l.OOOR 

69.7 

73.2 

31.7 

3,517 

6. 

1,000T 

67.0 

73.1 

32,558 

T. 

5OOH  + 

70.2 

76.1 

3h.2 

866 

5OOR 

1,566 

8. 

5OOR  + 

67.0 

72.0 

30.9 

1,251 

5OOT 

9,878 

9. 

5OOH  + 

67.2 

73.3 

35.0 

761 

5OOT 

10. 

5OOH  + 

69.0 

70.1* 

31.5 

866 

5OOR  + 

1,1488 

5OOT 

7,761 

11. 

1,500H 

69.5 

70.3 

31.6 

3,576 

12. 

1,500R 

69.5 

80.5 

'  36.0 

5,136 

13. 

1,500T 

6h.o 

Ih.l 

35.3 

li8,92l 

Ik. 

1,500H  + 

65.7 

73.3 

36.5 

1,767 

1,500R  + 

2,563 

1,500T 

16,021 

15. 

Uninoctilated 

67.7 

Ih.l 

35.7 

0 

Differences  vere  not  significant  at  the  5  per  cent  level  of  probability. 

H  =  Heli  cotylenchus  dihystera.R    =  Rotylenchulus  renif ormis , 
T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni 


Figxire  1. — Photomicrographs  of  adiilt  females  of  Rotylenchulus 
reniformis.    A,  Eelvorm  shape;  B,  C,  D,  developing  stages;  E,  mature 
kidney- shape.    F,  An  enlargement  of  A,  showing  vulva  (v).  Didelphic 
reflexed  ovaries  are  not  discernible  in  this  photograph. 


Figure  2. 
culated  plant. 


— A,  Cross  section  viev  of  a  tobacco  root  from  an  unino- 
B,  An  enlarged  view  of  A. 


Figure  h. — Photomicrograph  of  two  females  of  Rotylenchulus 
reniformis  feeding  in  the  same  area  of  a  tobacco  root.    Note  the 
dissolution  of  cell  walls  in  the  hypertrophied  cells. 


-  28  - 


Figure  5. — Cross  section  view  of  a  tobacco  root  infected  with 
Kotylenchulus  reniforais  showing  the  nematode  head  positioned  near  the 
hjrpertrophied  peri cycle.    Note  the  dark  stained  structure  (a)  in  the  cell 
near  the  nematode  head  (b). 


.tMnlJ'^T  of  a  portion  of  Fig.  5.    Ifote  the  dark 

^M^r./  '"i^^*  ^  f  ^  ^^^^^-^^  connecting  from  the 

point  of  stylet  insertion  (b)  into  the  hyoertrophied  cell 


-  29  - 


Figure  7.— A,  Cross  section  view  of  a  tobacco  root  infected  vith 
Rotylenchulus  reniformis.    Note  that  some  hypertrophied  cells  are  in 
double  layers.    B,  A  comparable  uninfected  root. 


nematode  vere  larger  than  those  more  distant,  giving  a  spindle-shaped  appear- 
ance in  longitudinal  section  (Fig.  8  A).    Occasionally  cell  vails  near  the 
feeding  site  were  dissolved  (Fig.  10),  a  condition  vhich  was  more  prevalent 
and  usually  more  extensive  where  more  than  one  specimen  fed  at  the  same  site 
(Fig.  U). 

The  vails  of  two  or  more  cells  near  the  head  of  a  parasite  were  thickened 
(Fig.  10).    Pink-stained  tubular  strands  were  sometimes  seen  in  a  cell  to 
which  the  lips  of  a  nematode  were  appressed  (Fig.  6).    These  strands  vere 
curved  and  appeared  to  be  connected  to  or  near  the  stylet  of  the  nematode. 


Figure  8.— A,  Viev  of  a  longitudinal  section  of  tobacco  root 
infec.ed  by  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  shovin/r  hyrertrophied  cells  and 
enlarged  nuclei.    Note  the  decreasing  size  of  the  hypertrophied  cells 
avay  from  the  site  of  feeding  (a).    B,  An  enlarged  viev  of  a  portion 


1 


Figure  9. — A-E,  Photomicrographs  of  serial  sections  of  a  tohacco 
root  infected  by  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  showing  the  developnent  of 
hypertrophied  cells  (arrows)  which  apparently  originated  in  the  pericycle 
A  is  more  distant  and  E  is  nearest  the  feeding  site.    Note  the  increasing 
numbers  of  hypertrophied  cells  from  A  to  E.    Anterior  parts  of  the  nema- 
tode are  not  seen  but  posterior  portions  can  be  seen  at  the  top  of  D  and 
E.    F,  A  comparable  cross  section  view  of  an  uninfected  root. 


I- ' 


-  3h  - 


Figure  10. — Photomicrof^raph  of  a  tobacco  root  shoving  two  nuclei 
(a)  of  a  hypertrophied  cell  vhich  had  been  fed  upon  "by  Rot;ylenchulus 
reniformis.    Note  the  thick  cell  vails  near  the  stylet  insertion  (b). 
The  nematode  head  (c)  was  moved  away  from  the  point  of  stylet  insertion 
during  the  preparation  process. 


DISCUSSION 
Pathogenicity  Experiments 


Experiment  I 

Specimens  of  T.  claytcni  fed  as  ectoparasites  on  toTsacco  and  reproduced 
in  large  numbers  under  the  conditions  of  the  experiments.    The  spiral 
nema.tode,  H_.  dihystera,  also  parasitized  tobacco  roots  but  did  not  reproduce 
in  ntimbers  as  large  as  did  T.  claytoni.    Single  aJid  multiple  inoculations  of 
these  tvo  species  caused  no  differences  in  top  growth  of  plants  when  com- 
pared to  the  uninoculated  plants.    Single  or  multiple  inoculations  with 
different  inoculum  levels  of  T^.  claytoni  caused  no  stunting  of  plants,  in 
contrast  to  the  results  reported  by  Graham  (195^).    Quantitative  yields  of 
the  plants  as  indicated  by  green  weights  of  leaves  were  not  affected  by  this 
parasite.    It  is  possible  that  quality  of  the  tobacco  might  have  been  af- 
fected due  to  parasitism  by  T_.  claytoni. 

J  '       All  three  inoculum  levels  of  T_.  claytoni  with  an  exposure  period  of  128 
days  resulted  in  reduced  root  systems  of  parasitized  plants  when  compared  to 
those  of  the  control  plants.    Growth  of  the  above-ground  portions  of  the 
plants  was  not  affected  by  the  root  reduction. 

J     i    No  explanation  can  be  offered  for  the  root  symptoms  expressed  in  the 
experiment  when  the  plants  were  each  inoculated  with  500  specimens  of  H. 
dihystera.    The  fact  that  no  symptoms  were  visible  at  the  higher  population 
levels  indicates,  however,  that  the  root  retardation  was  due  to  factors 


-  36  - 

other  than  the  presence  of  this  parasite.    Root  retardation  in  the  T. 
claytoni  treatments  was  always  accompanied  by  some  discoloration  and 
shriveled  appearance. 

Inoculations  with  500  specimens  of  T.  claytoni  +  500  specimens  of  H. 
dihystera  also  resulted  in  retarded  root  systems  of  the  plants.    It  is 
probable  that  T.  claytoni  was  primarily  responsible  for  the  retardation. 
\\'here  T.  claytoni  and  H.  dihystera  were  inoculated  in  combinations  (500  or 
1,000  specimens  each),  terminal  populations  of  each  species  were  about  the 
same  as  when  each  was  inoculated  alone  at  comparable  levels.    It  was  con- 
cluded that  neither  T.  claytoni  nor  H_.  dihystera  suppressed  or  stim\ilated 
reproduction  of  the  other  species. 

Experiment  II  ' 
Treatments  in  this  experiment  were  similar  to  those  in  Experiment  I 
but  differed  in  time  of  year,  a  shorter  period  of  exposure  and  the  use  of 
ftmigated  soil  for  Experiment  II.    Nevertheless,  plant  growth  was  better 
than  that  in  Experiment  I.    The  better  growth  was  probably  due  to  a  longer 
day  length  and  the  use  of  fumigated  soil. 

Terminal  populations  of  T^.  claytoni  in  every  case  were  several  times 
greater  than  the  inoculum  level  (Table  3).    However,  the  terminal  numbers 
were  not  so  great  as  those  of  Experiment  I,  possibly  due  to  the  shorter 
duration  of  the  experiment,  the  different  method  of  extracting  nematodes 
from  soil  and  the  use  of  fumigated  soil. 

The  numbers  of  H_.  dihystera  recovered  on  termination  of  the  experiment 
were  less  than  the  inoculum  used,  whether  inoculated  alone  or  in  combination 
with  T.  claytoni  (Table  3).    Nonetheless,  all  the  recovered  specimens  had 


dark  intestines  indicating  continuous  feedinR.    It  is  probable  that  the  small 
number  recovered  was  due  to  inefficiency  of  the  extraction  technique.  V/eber 
and  Williams  (1968)  reported  recovery  of  only  53.3  per  cent  of  H_,  erythrinae 
vith  the  centrifu^!;al- flotation  technique.    Reproductive  potential  of  H. 
dihystera  might  also  be  low.    The  life  cycle  of  this  species  is  not  known, 
but  Taylor  (19d1)  reported  that  the  life  cycle  of  H,  microlobus ,  a  similar 
species,  was  completed  on  tomato  in  35  days  at  22.80C  and  at  least  30  days 
at  26.T°C.    If  the  life  cycle  of  H.  dihystera  is  of  similar  duration,  the  ex- 
posure period  of  80  days  would  have  been  sufficient  for  two  or  at  most  three 
generations  in  this  experiment.    Furthermore,  tobacco  may  not  be  a  favorable 
host  for  H.  dihystera. 

Experiment  III 

All  three  nematode  species  were  used  in  this  experiment  in  single  and 
multiple  inoculations.    No  significant  differences  occurred  between  inoculated 
and  uninoculated  plants  (Table  h)  but  means  of  plant  heights,  leaf  weights 
and  root  weights  were  smaller  than  those  of  plants  in  Experiment  II,  pre- 
sunably  due  to  the  shorter  period  of  the  experiment.    Less  space  was  allowed 
between  the  pots  and  this  may  have  hampered  plant  growth.    Terminal  popula- 
tions of  nematodes  were  determined  using  the  modified  Baermann  funnel 
technique  (Christie  and  Perry,  1951).    Treatments  that  were  inoculated  with 
T.  claytoni  alone  or  in  combination  with  one  or  both  of  the  other  species 
resulted  in  terminal  populations  of  T.  claytoni  greater  than  the  inoculvtm. 
However,  terminal  populations  of  H.  dihystera  and  R.  reniformis  recovered 
were  less  than  the  inoculum  whether  inoculated  alone  or  in  combination  with 
one  or  both  of  the  other  species.    The  Baermann  funnel  as  used  was  not  an 
efficient  method  of  extracting  nematodes  from  soil  and  this  was  undoubtedly 


-  38  - 

the  primary  reason  for  the  smaller  numters  recovered.    The  relatively- 
short  period  of  exposure  (JO  days)  might  have  heen  a  contributing  factor 
also.    Other  possible  reasons  were  discussed  under  Experiment  II. 

Experiment  IV 

This  experiment  was  a  repetition  of  Experiment  III  except  that  the  ex- 
posure period  was  shortened  to  k2  days.    While  plant  heights,  leaf  weights 
and  root  weights  were  less  than  those  of  plants  in  previous  experiment s, no 
symptoms  of  injury  were  observed.    In  this  experiment  the  rapid  centrifugsil- 
flotation  technique  (Jenkins,  196k)  was  used  to  isolate  nematodes  from  the 
soil.    In  spite  of  the  relatively  short  duration  of  the  experiment  all  three 
nematode  species  were  recovered  in  greater  numbers  than  used  as  inocxilum  in- 
dicating that  this  method  of  removal  is  more  efficient  than  the  Baermann 
funnel.    Also  no  determination  was  made  of  the  number  of  females  of  R. 
reniformis  embedded  in  the  roots .    The  fact  that  T.  claytoni  was  always  re- 
covered in  larger  numbers  than  were  the  other  species  demonstrates  that  the 
reproductive  potential  of  T.  claytoni  obviously  is  greater  than  that  of  H. 
dihystera  and  R_.  reniformis  under  the  conditions  of  these  experiments. 

When  all  three  nematode  species  were  inocxxlated  alone  at  500,  1,000 
and  1,500  specimens  terminal  populations  of  each  k2  days  after  inoculation 
increased  in  proportion  to  the  inoculum  level  (Fig.  11).  Helicotylenchus 
dihystera  increased  an  average  of  about  2.6  times,  Rotylenchulus  reniformis 
about  3  times    and  Tylen chorhyn chus  claytoni  about  3^ . 5  times . 

Populations  of  H.  dihystera  k2  days  after  inoctaation  were  not  signifi- 
cantly different  when  500  specimens  were  inoculated  alone  than  when  500 
specimens  were  inoculated  in  combination  with  500  T.  claytoni  or  500  R. 
reniformis  or  both  (Table  6).    The  same  relationship  held  when  1,500  specimens 


-  39  - 


50,000 


1*0,000 


30 ,000 


20,000 


10,000 


I     I    Number  recovered 


Original  numbers 


m 


H_.  dihystera 


R.  reniformis 


2ES 


:v"'"'t 


T.  claytoni 


Figure  11. —Comparison  of  terminal  population  levels  of  three  nematode 
species  at  different  levels  of  inoculum  k2  days  after  inoculation. 


WW 


-  ho  - 

Table  6. — Comparison  of  terminal  popiilations  of  Helicotylenchus 

dihystera  inoculated  alone  and  in  combinations  as  indicated. 


 Replications  

Treatments  I  II  III  IV  Means 


500H 

9^45 

1,295 

1,260 

2,100 
8U0 

1,1+00 

5OOH  + 

525 

665 

1,1*35 

866 

5OOR 

T61 

5OOH  + 

805 

560 

1,155 

525 

5OOT 

866 

5OOH  + 

595 

735 

92+5 

1,190 

500R  + 
500T 


Differences  were  not  significant  at  the  5  per  cent  level  of 
probability. 

H  =  Heli cotylenchus  dihystera,  R  =  Rotylenchulus  reniformis 
T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni 


-  l4l  - 


Table  7. — Coaparison  of  terminal  popiilations  of  Hotylenchulus  renifonais 
inoculated  alone  and  in  combinations  as  indicated. 


Treatments 

I 

Replications 
II  III 

IV 

1 

Means 

500R^ 

1,1*70 

910 

665 

1,365 

500R  + 

980 

1,995 

1,925 

1,365 

1,556 

500H 

500R  + 

'  630 

770 

2,625 

980 

■  1,251 

500T 

5OOR  + 

1,715 

1,020 

1,785 

1,1+35 

1,1*88 

5OOH  + 

5OOT 

Larvae,  males  and  eelworm-shaped  females  vere  included. 


Differences  vere  not  significant  at  the  5  per  cent  level  of 
probability . 

R  =  Rotylenchulus  reniformis ,  H  =  Heli coty lenchus  dihystera 
T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni . 


of  each  species  vere  used  (Table  9).     In  both  cases,  however,  the  means 
were  hiRher  when  H_.  dihystcra  was  used  alone. 

/       Populations  of  n_.  reniformis  h2  days  after  inoculation  were  not  sipp:iifi- 
cantly  greater  when  500  specimens  were  inoculated  alone  than  when  500 
specimens  were  inoculated  in  combination  with  500  specimens  of  T.  claytoni , 
500  specimens  of  H.  dihystera  or  both  (Table  7).    However,  when  1,500 
specimens  of  R.  reniformis  were  inoculated  alone  and  when  1,500  were  inocu- 
lated with  1,500  T.  claytoni    and  1,500  H.  dihystera  differences  were  signifi- 
cant at  the  5  per  cent  level  (Table  10).    While  the  presence  of  the  other 
nematodes  did  not  effect  reproduction  of  R.  reniformis  at  the  lower  inoculum 
levels,  they  did  have  an  apparent  effect  at  the  higher  level. 

Populations  of  T.  claytoni  k2  days  after  inoculation  were  not  signifi- 
cantly different  when  500  specimens  were  inoculated  alone  than  when  500 
specimens  were  inoculated  with  500  H.  dihystera.  500  R.  reniformis  or  both. 
The  means,  however,  were  higher  when  inoculated  alone  (Table  8).    When  1,500 
T.  claytoni  were  inoculated  alone  and  when  1,500  were  inoculated  with  1,500 
ii*  ^i^-ystera  and  1,500  R_.  reniformis  differences  were  significant  at  the  1 
per  cent  level  (Table  11).    The  presence  of  the  other  two  nematodes  definitely 
influenced  reproduction  by  T.  claytoni.    The  influence  probably  was  competi- 
tion for  feeding  sites  and/or  food. 

Histopathology 

Penetration  of  roots  by  the  parasite  was  not  observed,  but  since 
eelworm-shaped  females  were  observed  near  the  root  tip  and  more  mature 
females  farther  away,  it  seems  apparent  that  the  eelworm-shaped  females 
penetrated  near  the  root  tips.    The  anterior  portion  of  their  bodies 


-  1*3  - 

Table  8. — Comparison  of  the  terminal  populations  of  Tylenchorhynchus 
claytoni  inoculated  alone  and  in  combinations  as  indicated. 


Replications 


Treatments 

I 

11 

III 

IV 

Means^ 

500T^ 

5,635 

18,31+0 

10,850 

1+2,350 

19,293 

500T  + 

l+,itlO 

It  ,690 

8,365 

l+,305 

5,1+1+2 

500H 

500T  + 

7,105 

11,970 

10,780 

9,660 

9,878 

500R 

500T  + 

1,9^3 

8,925 

8,015 

6,160 

7,761 

5OOH  + 

5OOR 

Difference  were  not  significant  at  the  5  per  cent  level  of  probability. 

T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni ,    H  =  Heli cotylenchus  dihystera, 
R  =  Rotylenchulus  reniformis. 


Table  9. — Comparison  of  the  terminal  populations  of  Heli cotylenchus 

dihystera  inoculated  alone  and  in  combination  with  Rotylenchulus 
reniformis  and  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni . 


Replications 

Means ^ 

Treatments 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

1,500H^ 
1,500H  + 
1,500R  + 
1,500T 

1,995 

1^,165 
1,330 

2,730 
2,205 

1,995 
1,5^0 

3,576 
1,767 

Differences  were  not  significant  at  the  5  per  cent  level  of 
probability. 

H  =  Helicotylenchus  dihystera,  R  =  Rotylenchulus  reniformis 
T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni . 


Table  10.— Comparison  of  terminal  populations  of  Rotylenchulus  renlformis 
inoculated  alone  and  in  combination  with  Helicotylenchus 
dihystera  and  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni. 


Replications 

Treatments 

I 

II  III 

IV 

Means 

1,500R°  ! 
1,500R  +  { 
1,500H  + 
1,500T 

3,7^5 
2,555 

3,955  6,U05 
1,715  3,500 

6,Ul40 
2,U85 

5,136 
2,563 

a  Only  larvae. 

males 

and  eelworm-shaped  females 

vera  included. 

^  Differences  significant  at  the  5  per  cent  level  of  probability. 


°  R  =  Rotylenchulus  reniformis,  H  =  Helicotylenchus  dihystera 
T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni. 


-  1+6  - 


Table  11. — Comparison  of  terminal  populations  of  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni 
inoculated  alone  and  in  combination  vith  Helicotylenchus 
dihystera  and  Rotylenchulus  reniformis. 


Replications 

Treatments 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

Keans^ 

1,500T^ 
1,500T  + 
1,500H  + 
1,500R 

28,560 
11,795 

62,1*75 
5,390 

27,650 
20,125 

77,000 

26,775 

1*8,921 
16 ,021 

^  Differences  significant  at  the  one  per  cent  level  of  probability. 

^  T  =  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni ,  H  =  Helicotylenchus  dihystera 
R  =  Rotylenchulus  reniformis . 


pentrated  the  epidermis,  cortical  parenchyma  and  endodermis  and  only  the 
stylet  penetrated  the  stele.    As  the  nematode  "began  to  feed  on  a  pericyclic 
cell  its  esophsigeal  gland  secretions  entered  the  cell  to  alter  the  proto- 
plasmic contents.    The  cell  began  to  enlarge  and  then  stained  darker  than 
surrounding  cells.    As  feeding  continued  other  pericyclic  cells  were  affected 
hoth  in  a  circular  and  in  a  longitudinal  direction.    The  cells  neeir  the  head 
of  the  nematode  were  larger  than  those  away  from  the  head,  due  apparently  to  . 
the  fact  that  these  cells  received  the  stimulatory  esophageal  gland  secretions 
in  more  concentrated  form  than  did  the  more  distant  cells.    In  a  few  cases 
cells  other  than  pericycle  became  involved,  probably  protophloem  or  protoxylem 
cells . 

As  the  females  matured  the  root  continued  to  grow  so  that  mature  females 
were  always  found  some  distance  from  the  root  tip. 

Males  were  never  observed  feeding  on  tobacco  roots^ which  agrees  with  the 
statement  of  Linford  and  Oliveira  (19^0).    Occasionally,  males  were  found  in 
the  gelatinous  matrix  secreted  by  the  female,  but  copulation  was  not  observed. 

Birchfield  (I962)  reported  that  R.  reniformis  fed  on  phloem  in  the 
cotton  plant,  and  Linford  and  Oliveira  (19^0)  reported  that  it  fed  on  the 
cortex  in  cowpea.    Apparently  different  tissue  is  used  as  the  feeding  site, 
depending  on  the  host  plant,  the  population  of  the  nematode  or  both. 

Cytoplasmic  response  of  pericyclic  cells  to  the  feeding  of  R_.  reniformis 
on  tobacco  roots  was  similar  to  the  response  of  cortical  cells  of  susceptible 
citrus  roots  fed  upon  by  Tylenchulus  semipenetrans  Cobb  (Van  Gundy  and 
Kirkpatrick,  1961*).    However,  no  cell  enlargement  occurred  in  citrus  nor  was 
the  area  involved  so  large  as  in  tobacco. 

Mankau  and  Linford  (1960)  reported  tubular  strands  in  the  syncytium  of 
•Ladino'  clover  fed  on  by  Heterodera  trifolii  Goffart,  but  they  reported 


-  1*8  - 

these  strands  as  "being  hyaline.    The  strands  in  tobacco  stained  pink.  The 
strands  are  apparently  related  in  some  way  to  feeding  as  suggested  by  Mankau 
and  Linford  (196O)  but  their  exact  nattire  remains  unknown. 


i 

SUMMARY 

Tylenchorhynchus  clnytoni ,  Helicotylenchus  dihystera,  and 
Rotylenchulus  reniformis  are  parasites  of  shade-grown  tobacco,  and  are 
found  frequently  in  shade-Rrown  tobacco  areas  of  North  Florida. 

Pathogenicity  experiments  using  shade-groxm  tobacco  variety  'Dixie 
Shade'  indicated  that  single  inoculation  of  T.  claytoni  at  levels  of 
500,  1,000,  or  2,000  specimens  per  2,000  ml  of  soil  significantly  re- 
tarded root  production  of  tobacco  plants  128  days  after  inoculation. 
Some  discoloration  and  shriveled  appearance  accompanied  root  retardation, 
but  lesions  or  necrosis  were  not  evident.    Exposure  periods  of  U2,  TO 
or  80  days  did  not  result  in  root  retardation. 

Multiple  inoculations  of  specimens  of  T.  claytoni  with  either 
^*  dihystera  or  R_.  reniformis  or  both  at  any  inoculum  level  usually  did 
not  affect  root  production  of  plants  compared  to  the  uninoctilated  plants. 

Inoculations  with  H.  dihystera  or  H.  reniformis  alone  or  in  combina- 
tion did  not  affect  top  growth  when  compared  to  xminoculated  plants. 

Terminal  populations  of  T«  claytoni  when  inoculated  alone  or  in 
combination  with  ff.  dlhyatera,        rem  1  feral s  or  both  increased  several 
times  over  the  inoculvim  levels.    Terminal  populations  of  II.  dihystera  and 
R_.  reniformis  were  in  most  cases  greater  than  the  inoculum  levels  but  num- 
bers were  not  as  great  as  with  T^.  claytoni .    Populations  of  li.  dihystera 
h2  days  after  inoculation  were  not  significantly  different  when  500 
specimens  were  inoculated  alone  than  when  500  specimens  were  inocvilated  in 

_  1»9  - 


combination  vith  500  T.  claytoni,  500  H.  reniformis  or  both.    The  sa^-ne  re- 
lationships held  vhen  1,500  specimens  of  each  species  vere  used.  Populations 
of  R.  reniformis  ^2  days  after  inoculation  vere  significantly  greater  vhen 
1,500  specimens  were  inoculated  alone  than  when  1,500  specimens  were  in- 
oculated in  combination  with  the  equal  numbers  of  T.  claytoni  and  H. 
dihystera.    The  same  relationships  did  not  hold  true  when  500  specimens  of 
each  species  vere  used.    Populations  of  T.  claytoni  U2  days  after  inocula- 
tion were  significantly  greater  when  1,500  specimens  were  inoculated  alone 
than  when  1,500  specimens  were  inoculated  with  1,500  H.  dihystera  and  1,500 
R.  reniformis.    However,  when  500  specimens  of  each  species  were  used  there 
were  no  significant  differences  in  terminal  populations  of  T.  cla>-toni. 

Histopathological  studies  of  tobacco  roots  infected  by  Rotylench^xLus 
reniformis  disclosed: 

1.    Eelworm-shaped  females  penetrated  tobacco  roots  near  the  root  tips 

to  initiate  infection. 

S.    Papasltea  penetrated  the  epiderrais,  cortical  parenchyma,  and 
endodermis  and  fed  in  the  pericyclic  region.    Only  the  stylet  penetrated 
into  pericyclic  cells. 

3.    Hypertrophy  and  enlargement  of  nuclei  occurred  in  the  pericyclic 
region  due  to  the  feeding  of  the  nematodes. 

h,    Hypertrophied  cells  extended  from  a  cell  in  which  the  nematode  sty- 
let was  inserted  to  cells  in  both  a  longitudinal  and  a  circular  direction. 

5.    The  cytoplasm  of  hypertrophied  cells  stained  darker  than  did  unin- 
fected surrounding  cells. 

Considering  the  data  on  pathogenicity  and  the  results  of  histological 
studies,  H.  dihystera,  T.  claytoni ,  and  R_.  reniformis  all  appear  to  be  weak 
pathogens  of  tobacco  but  none  a  severe  pathogen. 


LITERATURE  CITED 


Ayala,  A.,  and  C.  T.  Ramirez.  Host-range,  distribution,  and 

bibliography  of  the  reniform  nematode,  Rotylenchulus  reniformis  vith 
special  reference  to  Puerto  Rico.    J.  Agr.  Univ.  P.  rT  48:li*0-l6l. 

Barker,  K.  R.,  and  G.  L.  Worf.    I966.    Effect  of  nutrient  on  nematode 
activity  on  azalea.    Phytopathology  56:102lt-1027. 

Birchfield,  W.    1962.    Host-parasite  relations  of  Rotylenchiilus  reniformis 
on  Gossypium  hirsutum.    Phytopathology  52 : 862-865. 

 ,  and  L.  R.  Brister.    I962.    New  hosts  and  nonhosts  of  reniform 

nematode.    Plant  Disease  Reptr.  1*6:683-685. 

 ,  and  J.  E.  Jones.    I96I.    Distribution  of  the  reniform  nematode 

in  relation  to  crop  failure  of  cotton  in  Louisiana.    Plant  Disease 
Reptr.  1+5:671-673. 

Brodie,  B.  B. ,  and  W.  E.  Cooper.    196^;.    Pathogenicity  of  certain  para- 
sitic nematodes  on  upland  cotton  seedlings.    Phytopathology  ^k: 
1019-1022. 

Christie,  J.  R. ,  and  V.  G.  Perry.    1951.    Removing  nematodes  from  soil. 
Proc.  Helminthol.  Soc.  Wash.  l8:106-108. 

Dasgupta,  D.  R. ,  D.  J.  Raski,  and  S.  A.  Sher.    I968.    A  revision  of  the 

genus  Rotylenchxilus  Linford  and  Oliveira,  I9I+0  (Nematoda:  Tylenchidae) . 
Proc.  Helminthol.  Soc.  Wash.  35:169-192. 

Drolsom,  P.  N. ,  and  E.  L.  Moore.    1955.    The  interaction  of  certain  to- 
bacco varieties  and  plant  parasitic  nematodes.    Plant  Disease  Reptr. 
39:703-701+. 

Fassuliotis,  G. ,  and  G.  J.  Rau.    I967.    The  reniform  nematode  in  South 
Carolina.    Plant  Disease  Reptr.  51:557. 

Grahan,  T.  W.    I95U.    The  tobacco  stiont  nematode  in  South  Carolina. 
Phytopathology  1+1+ : 332,     (Abstr.  ) 

Holdeman,  Q.  L.    1956.    The  effect  of  the  tobacco  stunt  nematode  on  the 
incidence  of  Fusarium  wilt  in  flue-cured  tobacco.  Phytopathology 
1+6:129. 

Hopper,  B.  E.    1958.    Plant-parasitic  nematodes  in  the  soils  of  southern 
forest  nurseries.    Plant  Disease  Reptr.  1+2 : 308-3ll+ . 


-  51  - 


-  52  - 


Jenkins,  W.  R.    196U.    A  rapid  centrifugal- flotation  technique  for 
separating  nematodes  from  soil.    Plant  Disease  Reptr.  it8:692. 

Johansen,  A.  D.    lohQ,    Plant  microtechnique.    McGrav-Hill  Book  Co.,  Inc. 
New  York.  523  p. 

Jones,  J.  E. ,  L.  D.  Newsom,  and  E.  L.  Finley.    1959.    Effect  of  the  reni- 
form  nematode  on  yield,  plant  characters,  and  fiber  properties  of 
upland  cotton.    Agron.  J.  51:353-356. 

Konicek,  D,  E. ,  and  H.  J.  Jensen.    I96I.    Helicotylenchus  nannus,  a 

spiral  nematode  associated  with  declining  gardenias.  Phytopathology 
51:65.  (Abstr.) 

Krusberg,  L.  R.    1959.    Investigations  on  life  cycle,  reproduction,  feed- 
ing habits ,  and  host  range  of  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni  Steiner. 
Nematologica  1*:  187-197. 

Lambe,  R.  C. ,  and  W.  Home.    I963.    The  reniform  nematode  in  cotton  in 
the  lower  Rio  Grande  Valley  of  Texas.    Plant  Disease  Reptr.  ^7:9^1. 

Linford,  M.  B. ,  and  J.  M.  Oliveira.    19^+0.    Rotylenchulus  reniformis  nov. 
gen.,  n.  stj.,  a  nematode  XDarasite  of  roots,    Proc.  Helminthol.  Soc. 
Wash.  7:35-^2. 

 ,  and  F.  Yap.    19^0.    Some  host  plants  of  the  reniform  nematode 

in  Hawaii.    Proc.    Helminthol.  Soc.  Wash.  Iih2-kk, 

Luc,  M.,  and  G.  de  Guiran.    I96O.    Les  nematodes  associes  aux  plantes 

de  L'ouest  Africain  liste  preliminarie.    L' Agron.  Trotiicale 
15:U3li_lil;9. 

Mankau,  R. ,  and  M.  B.  Linford,    I96O.    Host-parasite  relationships  of  the 
clover  cyst  nematode,  Hcterodera  trifolii  Goffart.    Univ.  111.  Agr, 
Fjcp.  Sta.  Bull,  667.  50  p. 

Martin,  G.  C.    1955.    Plant  and  soil  nematodes  of  the  Federation  of 
Rhodesia  and  Nyasaland.    Preliminary  investigations.  Nematodes 
catalogued  under  hosts  or  associated  plants,    J.  Rhodesia  Agr. 
52:3U6-351. 

McBeth,  C.  W. ,  A.  L.  Taylor,  and  A.  L,  Smith.    IpUl.    Note  on  staining 
nematodes  in  root  tissue.    Proc.  Helminthol.  Soc.  VJash,  8:26. 

McGlohon,  N.  E. ,  J.  N.  Sasser,  and  R.  T.  Sherwood.    I96I.  Investigations 
of  plant-parasitic  nematodes  associated  with  forage  crous  in  North 
Carolina.    N,  C,  Agr,  Exp.  Sta.  Tech.  Bull.  1I+8.  39  p. 

Minton,  E.  B. ,  A.  L.  Smith,  and  E.  J.  Cairns.    I96U.    Effects  of  7 

nematodf:    species  on  10  cotton  selections.    Phytotiathology  5l+:625 
(Abstr. ) 


-  53  - 

Minton,  N.  A.,  and  E.  J.  Cairns.    1957.    Suitability  of     soybeans  var. 
Ogden  and  tvelve  other  plants  as  hosts  of  the  spiral  nematode. 
Phytopathology  UT:313.     (Abstr. ) 

 ,  and  B.  E.  Hopper.    1959.    The  reniform  and  sting  nematodes  in 

Alabama.    Plant  Disease  Reptr,  ^+3:^*7. 

Neal,  D.  C.     195^^    The  reniform  nematode  and  its  relationship  to  the 
incidence  of  Fusarium  wilt  of  cotton  at  Baton  Rouge,  Louisiana. 
Phytopathology  1i1;:UUT-1+50. 

Nelson,  R.  R.    1956.    Resistance  to  the  stxint  nematode  in  corn.  Plant 
Disease  Reptr.  UO:635-639. 

Peacock,  F.  C.    1956.    The  reniform  nematode  in  the  Gold  Coast. 
Neraatologica  1:307-310. 

Perry,  V.  G.,  H.  M.  Darling,  and  G.  Thome.    1959.    Anatomy,  taxonomy, 
and  control  of  certain  spiral  nematodes  attacking  blue  grass  in 
Wisconsin.    Univ.  Wise.  Res.  Bull.  20T.  2h  p. 

Roman,  J.    19^5 .    Nematodes  of  Puerto  Rico:  The  genus  Helicotylenchus 

Steiner,  19^5  (Nematoda:  Hoplolaiminae ) .    Univ.  P.  R.  Agr.  Exn.  Sta. 
Tech.  Paper  iil:l-23. 

Ruehle,  J.  L.    1966.    Nematodes  parasitic  on  forest  trees  I.  Reproduction 
of  ectoparasites  on  pines.    Nematologica  12:l+U3-Ult7. 

Sass,  J.  E.    1958.    Botanical  microtechnique.    Iowa  State  Coll.  Press, 
Ames.    228  p. 

Sasser,  J.  N. ,  0.  F.  Vargras  Gonzales,  and  A.  Martin.    I962.    New  find- 
ings of  plant-parasitic  nematodes  in  Peru.    Plant  Disease  Reptr. 

Seinhorst,  J.  W.    1956.    The  quantitative  extraction  of  nematodes  from 
soil.    Nematologica  1:2^+9-26?. 

Sher,  S.  A.    1958.    The  effect  of  nematodes  on  azaleas.    Plant  Disease 
Reptr.  U2:81»-85. 

 •    1966.    Revision  of  Hoplolaiminae  (Nematoda)    VI.  Helicotylenchus 

Steiner,  19^5.    Nematologica  12:1-56.  '  

Sledge,  F.  B.    1956.    Pathogenicity  of  the  spiral  nematode,  Helicotylenchus 
"s.nnu5  Steiner,  19^<5,  in  relation  to  selected  varieties  of  corn. 
J.  Ala.  Acad.  Sci.  28:123.  (Abstr.) 

Smith,  A.  L.    19^+0.    Distribution  and  relation  of  meadow  nematode, 
Pratylenchus  -pratensis,  to  Fusarium  wilt  of  cotton  in  Georgia. 
Phytopathology  30:710.  (Abstr.) 

 A.  L.  Taylor.    19^*1.    Nematode  distribution  in  the  10'40 

regional  cotton-wilt  plots.    Phytopathology  31:771.  (Abstr.) 


Springer,  J.  K,    196h.    Nematodes  associated  with  plants  in  cultivated 

woody  plant  nurseries  and  uncultivated  woodland  areas  in  New  Jersey. 
N.  J.  Dep.  Agr.  Cir.  U29.  ^^0  p. 

Steiner,  G.    1937.    T^'lenchorhynchus  claytoni ,  n.  sp. ,  an  apparently 
rare  nemic  parasite  of  the  tobacco  plant.    Proc.  Helminthol.  Soc. 
Wash.  it:33-3i+. 

 .    19^9.    Plant  nematodes  the  grower  should  know.    Soil.  Sci.  Soc, 

Fla.  Proc.  (19^+2)  U-h: 72-11?. 

Sumner,  D.  R.    I967.    Nematodes  in  bluegrass.    Plsmt  Disease  Reptr. 
51:li57_lt60. 

Sutherland,  J.  R.,  and  R.  E.  Adaais.    196^;.    The  parasitism  of  red  pine 

and  other  forest  nursery  crops  by  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni  Steiner. 
Nematologica  10:637-6^^3. 

Swarup,  G.,  R.  P.  Nath,  and  C.  L.  Sethi.    I967.    The  plant  parasitic 

nematode  genus  Rotylenchulus  in  India.    Ind.  Phytopath.  20:118-123. 

Tappan,  W.  B. ,  and  R.  R.  Kincaid.    I962.    Chemical  control  of  nematode 
root-rot  complex  of  shade-grown  tobacco.    Univ.  Fla.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta. 
Annu.  Rep.  p.  306. 

 .    1963.    Ibid,  p.  318. 

 .    196!+.    Ibid,  p.  333. 

Taylor,  D.  P.    i960.    Host  range  study  of  the  spiral  nematode, 

Helicotylenchus  microlobus.  Plant  Disease  Reptr.  Ul+:7U7-750. 

 .    1961.    Biology  and  host-parasite  relationships  of  the  spiral 

nematode,  Helicotylenchus  microlobus.    Proc.  Helminthol.  Soc.  Wash. 
28:60-66. 

Thome,  G.    I961.    Principles  of  nematology.    McGraw-Hill  Book  Co.,  Inc., 
New  York.    553  p. 

Timm,  R.  W.    1956.    The  reniform  nematode,  a  root  parasite  of  Vicia  faba. 
Pakistan  Rev.  Agr.  (A  research  note)  2(3): 135. 

Troll,  J.,  and  R.  A.  Rhode.    1966.    Pathogenicity  of  Pratylenchus 

penetrans  and  Tylenchorhynchus  claytoni  on  turf  grasses.  Phyto- 
pathology 56:995-998. 

Van  Gundy,  S.  D. ,  and  J.  D.  Kirkpatrick.    1961t.    Nature  of  resistance  in 
certain  citrus  root  stocks  to  citrus  nematode.  Phytopatholosv 
5i»:ltl9-i*27.  .  ev 

Van  Weerdt,  L.  G.,  W.  Birchfield,  and  R.  P.  Esser.    1959.  Observations 
on  some  subtropical  plant-parasitic  nematodes  in  Florida.    Soil  and 
Crop  Sci.  Soc.  Fla.  Proc.  19:l|l+3-it51. 


-  55  - 


Weber,  D.  E. ,  and  A.  S,  Williams.  I968.  Evaluation  of  centrifugal- 
flotation  technique  for  quantitative  recovery  of  three  types  of 
ectoparasitic  nematodes.    Nematologica  ll»:l8,  (Abstr. ) 


BIOGRAPHICAL  SKETCH 


Sawart  Ratanaworabhan  was  born  on  March  lU,  1936  in  Prae,  northern 
Thailand.    After  attending  public  schools  at  Prae  and  Chiengmai,  he  en- 
rolled at  Kasetsart  University,  Bangkok,  where  he  received  the  degree  of 
Bachelor  of  Science  in  Agriculture  in  I96O.    He  worked  as  plant  quaran- 
tine inspector  until  1961,  when  he  joined  the  staff  of  the  Rice  Protection 
Research  and  Training  Center,  Department  of  Rice,  Bangkhen,  Bangkok.  He 
came  to  the  United  States  in  March,  I963  and  enrolled  in  the  College  of 
Agriculture,  University  of  Florida  in  the  summer  trimester  seeking  a 
second  bachelor's  degree.    He  was  awarded  a  B.  S.  A.  degree  in  April, 
I96U.    He  entered  the  Graduate  School  in  the  spring  of  I96U  and  was 
awarded  the  degree  of  Master  of  Science  in  December,  I965.    He  continued 
his  graduate  work  toward  the  degree  of  Doctor  of  Philosophy  while  holding 
a  teaching  assistantship  in  the  Department  of  Entomology  and  Hematology 
until  he  completed  the  requirements  for  the  degree  in  March,  I969. 

He  married  the  former  Niphan  Chanthawanich  on  August  9,  I967  in 
Gainesville,  Florida.    He  is  a  member  of  the  Newell  Entomological  Society, 
the  Helminthological  Society  of  Washington  and  the  Society  of  Nematolo- 
gists. 


-  56  - 


This  dissertation  vas  prepared  under  the  direction  of  the  chairman 
of  the  candidate's  supervisory  committee  and  has  been  approved  by  all 
members  of  that  committee.    It  was  submitted  to  the  Dean  of  the  College 
of  Agriculture  and  to  the  Graduate  Council,  and  was  approved  as  partial 
fulfillment  of  the  requirements  for  the  degree  of  Doctor  of  Philosophy. 

March ,  I969