Skip to main content

Full text of "Philosophical transactions. Series A: Mathematical and physical sciences"

See other formats


PHILOSOPHICAL 


TRANSACTIONS 


OF    THE 


ROYAL    SOCIETY    OF    LONDON. 


t* 


SERIES  A. 


CONTAINING   PAPERS   OF   A   MATHEMATICAL   OR  PHYSICAL   CHARACTER. 


VOL.  213. 


LONDON: 

I'RINTKD    BY    HARRISON    AND   SONS,    ST.    MARTIN'S   LANE,    W.C., 

|)rijrtfrs  in  ®rbinarg  lo  $is 

FEBRUARY,  1914. 


Q 


[  iii  ] 


CONTENTS. 

(A) 
VOL.  213. 


Advertisement page  v 


I.  On  the  Refraction  and  Dispersion  of  the  Halogens,  Halogen  Acids,  Ozone,  Steam, 

Oxides  of  Nitrogen  and  Ammonia.  By  CLIVE  CUTHBEKTSON,  Fellow  of 
University  College,  London  University,  and  MAUDE  CUTHBERTSON.  Commu- 
nicated by  A.  W.  POSTER,  F.R.S. page  1 

II.  On  a   Cassegrain  Rejlector   with    Corrected   Field.     By  Dr.    R.    A.    SAMPSON, 

F.R.S. 27 

III.  The  Thermal  Properties  of  Carbonic  Acid  at  Low  Temperatures.    By  C.  FBEWEN 

JENKIN,  M.A.,  M.Inst.C.E.,  frofessor  of  Engineering  Science,  Oxford;  and 
D.  R.  PYE,  M.A.,  Fellow  of  New  College,  Oxford.  Communicated  by  Sir 
J.  ALFRED  EWING,  K.C.B.,  F.R.S. 67 

IV.  The  Capacity  for  Heat  of  Metals  at  Different  Temperatures,  being  an  Account 

of  Experiments  performed  in  the  Research  Laboratory  of  the  University 
College  of  South  Wales  and  Monmouthshire.  By  E.  H.  GRIFFITHS,  Sc.D., 
F.R.S.,  and  EZER  GRIFFITHS,  B.Sc.,  Fellow  of  the  University  of  Wales  .  119 

V.  On  the  General  Theory  of  Elastic  Stability.     By  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL,  B.A.,  Fellow 

of  Trinity  College,   Cambridge.       Communicated  by  Prof.  A.  E.  H.  LOVE, 

F.R.S. 187 

a  2 


VI.  Some  Phenomena  of  Stmtpots  and  of  Terrestrial  Magnetism.— -Part  II.  By 
C.  CHRER,  Sc.D.,  LL.D.,  F.R.S.,  Superintendent  of  Kew  Observatory 

.     .      page  245 

VIL  On  the  Diurnal  Variations  of  the  Earth's  Magnetism  produced  by  the  Moon 
and  Sun.  By  S.  CHAPMAN,  B.A.,  D.Sc.,  Chief  Assistant  at  the  Royal 
Observatory,  Greenwich.  Communicated  by  the  Astronomer  Royal  .  .  279 

VIII.  A  Critical  Study  of  Spectral  Series.— Part  HI.    The  Atomic   Weight  Term 
and    its    Import    in    the    Constitution    of   Spectra.      By    W.    M.     HICKS, 
F.R.&     .......     ."*.'  .  ".' 323 

IX.  On  the  Self -inductance  of  Circular  Coils  of  Rectangular  Section.    By  T.  R.  LYLE, 

M.A.,  Sc.D.,  F.R.S. 421 

X.  A  Method  of  Measuring   the   Pressure.  Produced  in  the  Detonation  of  High 

Explosives    or    by    the    Impact    of    Bullets.       By    BERTRAM    HOPKINSON, 
F.R.S.     .  437 

XI.  Gravitational   Instability   and   the  Nebular  Hypothesis.      By  J.    H.    JEANS, 

M.A.,F.R.S. 457 

Index  to  Volume 437 


ADVERTISEMENT. 


THE  Committee  appointed   by  the   lioyal  Society  to  direct  the   publication  of  the 
Philosophical  Transactions  take  this  opportunity  to  acquaint  the  public  that  it  fully 
appears,  as  well  from  the  Council-books  and  Journals  of  the  Society  as  from  repeated 
declarations  which  have  been  made  in  several  former  Transactions,  that  the  printing  of 
them  was  always,  from  time  to  time,  the  single  act  of  the  respective  Secretaries  till 
the  Forty-seventh  Volume ;  the  Society,  as  a  Body,  never  interesting  themselves  any 
further  in  their  publication  than  by  occasionally  recommending  the  revival  of  them  to 
some  of  their  Secretaries,  when,  from  the  particular  circumstances  of  their  affairs,  the 
Transactions  had  happened  for  any  length  of  time  to  be  intermitted.     And  this  seems 
principally  to  have  been  done  with  a  view  to  satisfy  the  public  that  their   usual 
meetings   were   then   continued,  for  the  improvement  of   knowledge  and  benefit  of 
mankind  :    the  great  ends  of  their  first  institution  by  the  Royal  Charters,  and  which 
they  have  ever  since  steadily  pursued. 

But  the  Society  being  of  late  years  greatly  enlarged,  and  their  communications  more 
numerous,  it  was  thought  advisable  that  a  Committee  of  their  members  should  be 
appointed  to  reconsider  the  papers  read  before  them,  and  select  out  of  them  such  as 
they  should  judge  most  proper  for  publication  in  the  future  Transactions;  which  was 
accordingly  done  upon  the  26th  of  March,  1752.  And  the  grounds  of  their  choice  are, 
and  will  continue  to  be,  the  importance  and  singularity  of  the  subjects,  or  the 
advantageous  manner  of  treating  them;  without  pretending  to  answer  for  the 
certainty  of  the  facts,  or  propriety  of  the  reasonings  contained  in  the  several  papers 
so  published,  which  must  still  rest  on  the  credit  or  judgment  of  their  respective 

authors. 

It  is  likewise  necessary  on  this  occasion  to  remark,  that  it  is  an  established  rule  of 
the  Society,  to  which  they  will  always  adhere,  never  to  give  their  opinion,  as  a  Body, 


upon  any  subject,  either  of  Nature  or  Art,  that  comes  before  them.     And  therefore  the 
thanks,  which  are  frequently  proposed  from  the  Chair,  to  be  given  to  the  authors  of 
such  papers  as  are  read  at  their  accustomed  meetings,  or  to  the  persons  through  whose 
hands  they  received  them,  are  to  be  considered  in  no  other  light  than  as  a  matter  of 
civility,  in  return  for  the  respect  shown  to  the  Society  by  those  communications.     The 
like  also  is  to  be  said  with  regard  to  the  several  projects,  inventions,  and  curiosities  of 
various  kinds,  which  are  often  exhibited  to  the  Society ;  the  authors  whereof,  or  those 
who  exhibit  them,  frequently  take  the  liberty  to  report,  and  even  to  certify  in  the 
public  newspapers,  that  they  have  met  with  the  highest  applause  and  approbation. 
And  therefore  it  is  hoped  that  no  regard  will  hereafter  be  paid  to  such  reports  and 
public  notices ;   which    in  some   instances   have  been    too   lightly   credited,    to   the 
dishonour  of  the  Society. 


PHILOSOPHICAL    TRANSACTIONS. 


I.   On  tli,'  Ift'frtirfioii  <uul  Dispersion  of  the  Halogens,  Halogen  Acids,  Ozone, 
Steam,  Oxides  of  Nitrogen  and  Ammonia. 

Hit  (  'I.IVK  (  YTHIIKRTSON,  l''<'il»ir  <>f  I ' ,' >  r,  ,-^ity  College,  London  Univerm/ >/. 

n,td  MAUDE  CUTHBERTSON. 

Communicated  by  A.  W.  PORTEK,  F.H.*. 
Received  October  18,  1912,— Read  January  16,  1913. 

CONTENTS. 

Page 

INTRODUCTORY. 

Scope  of  research 

Expression  of  results  :  formula  and  its  interpretation  .     .     . 

Summary  of  results 

EXI'KKIMENTAI.. 

Measurements  of  refraction  and  dispersion — 

Chlorine 

Standard  conditions 

IT 

Bromine 

Iodine 

Hydrochloric  acid 

Hydrohromic  acid 

determination  of  density  of I3 

•I  n 

Ilydriodic  acid 

„  „     determination  of  density  of ;     • 

Steam  .    .     .     .' •    • 

Ozone 

Ammonia 

AO 

Nitric  oxide 

no 

Nitrous  oxide 

98 

Errors  of  experiment 

05 
Calculation  of  constants 

IT  has  long  been  well  known  that  the  refractive  indices  of  simple  gaseous  compounds 
do  not  obey  the  additive  law  so  closely  as  those  of  solids  or  liquids.  From  the  study 
of  these  last  GLADSTONE  and  DALE,  and  their  followers,  succeeded  iu  obtaining 
refraction  equivalents  for  a  large  number  of  the  elements  which  were  fairly  constant 
for  the  same  class  of  compound.  But  in  gases  the  discrepancies  were  found  to  be 

VOL.   CCX1IL— A  497.  B  Published  separately,  April  4,  1913. 


Ml:.  CLIVE  COTHi:m:i>"N    *N"   MAVM  COTffi*ftfBOU   ON  THE 

much  wider  and  this  api-eared  the  more  surprising  since,  in  other  fields  of  research, 
the  gaseous  state  has   Pn,v,-d   peculiarly   favourable   for   the   discovery   of  simple 

relations. 

Accumulation  of  Data.— The  investigation,  of  which  the  present  paper  forms  part, 

was  designed  to  throw  light  on  the  cause  of  these  anomalies. 

The  first  step  was  to'enlarge  the  field  of  the  enquiry  by  the  accumulation  of  data, 
and  with  this  object  we  have,  either  together  or  in  collaboration  with  others,  deter- 
mined and  redetermined  the  refraction  and  dispersion  in  the  gaseous  state  of  fourteen 
elements  and  ten  compounds  within  the  limits  of  the  visible  spectrum,  and  the 
refraction  of  six  elements  and  four  compounds  for  a  single  wave-length. 

The  numU-r  is  still  far  too  small.  Many  interesting  compounds  remain  to  be 
invest  igated.  But,  as  the  present  instalment  of  work  has  occupied  nearly  two  years 
and  has  led  to  certain  definite  conclusions,  it  seems  better  to  publish  it  rather  than  to 
await  the  addition  of  more  difficult  and,  perhaps,  less  instructive  examples. 

( '/,,./.-.  ,•/'  ( '••ntiHtundx. — In  selecting  the  compounds  to  be  examined  we  have  been 
guided  by  the  principle  that  the  molecule  should  consist  of  as  few  atoms  as  possible, 
and  that  the  refraction  and  dispersion  of  each  constituent  should  be  measurable  in 
the  gaseous  state.  It  is  unfortunate  that  the  list  of  compounds  which  comply  with 
these  requirements  is  very  short.  All  compounds  of  carbon  are  excluded.  Of  those 
substances  which  are  dealt  with  in  the  present  paper,  the  most  important  are  the 
halogen  acids,  which  form  a  regular  series  of  simple  diatomic  molecules.  Steam,  S02, 
and  HjS  form  an  interesting  cycle,  and  the  two  oxides  of  nitrogen  are  very  instructive 
since  the  eonstituents  are  the  same  in  both  cases.*  Ozone  is  remarkable  as  an 
example  of  the  effect  of  polymerization  on  the  refractivity. 

l-'.j- 1 >,••  .<>•/••//  of  Results. — The  choice  of  a  formula  for  the  expression  of  results  is  of 
fundamental  importance.  Previous  workers  on  the  subject  of  gaseous  refractivities 
have  almost  invariably  used  that  of  CAUCHY,  with  two  terms  or  three,  according  to 
the  degree  of  accuracy  of  their  figures.  But  this  formula  is  not  based  on  modern 
physical  theory.  Moreover,  we  have  shown  in  a  previous  paperf  that,  when  only  two 
constants  are  used,  it  is  inadequate  to  express  the  experimental  results,  even  in  the 
\  isible  spectrum  ;  while  if  a  third  constant  and  term  involving  I/A4  is  introduced,  the 
shape  of  the  dispersion  curve  cannot  be  easily  grasped  on  inspection  of  the  figures. 
For  these  reasons  we  have  abandoned  this  formula,  and  have  used,  tentatively,  a 
formula  of  SKI.LMKYKKS  type,  £  l  =  M-i  (approximately)  =  N 

«  yl  LJl^      ff" 

It   is  unnecessary  to  defend  the  adoption  for  gaseous  indices  of  this  expression, 
been  widely  used  for  solids,  and  is  in  general  outline  established  on  theory 

•  The  exwnin.tiou  of  NO,  and  N  A  haa  been  postponed  on  account  of  its  difficulty,  but  promises  to  be 
1  important  owing  to  the  association  which  characterises  it 

Hspersion  of  Air,  Oxygen,  Nitrogen,  and  Hydrogen  and  their  Relations," 
,  Mid  M.  GtTHBwmtoN,  •  Roy.  Soc.  Proc.,'  A,  vol.  83,  p.  151,  1909. 


KKFKACTION  AND  Dlsl'KltSION  OF  T1IK  HALOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  ETC.          3 

and  confirmed  by  experiment.  But  it  is  desirable  to  emphasise  the  fact  that  the 
calculation  of  the  constants  given  in  this  paper  from  a  formula  containing  only  one 
tt-nn  on  the  right-hand  side  is  only  provisional,  since  the  main  conclusion  of  the 
authors  is  that,  Ixitli  for  i-lcim-iils  and  compounds,  a  single  term  is  inadequate,  except 
in  the  case  of  monatomic  gases.  The  simple  form  of  the  formula  is,  however,  useful 
for  indicating  at  a  glance  the  direction  and  magnitude  of  the  changes  in  refractive 
and  dispersive  power  which  take  place  when  elements  combine  to  form  a  compound. 

It'  /<,  n-,  are  the  refractive  indices  of  a  substance  for  two  wave-lengths  for  which  the 
frequencies  an-  //,  H.J,  we  have 


I -Ma  _  ni-nj  ._ 


approximately, 


since  »/  is  usually  small  compared  witli  H{IJ.  The  left  side  of  the  equation  expresses 
the  dispersive  power  of  the  substance,  which  is  thus  seen  to  be  inversely  proportional 
ion,3. 

Chiiniji-x    <>f    /f,'fi-'i<-/ir<-    Power.  —  Let   yuA  —  1  =     3   A    »'•    MB~!  =     »    IL~l   be   the 

^0  A  —  ft  "•'  B  —  ft 

formuko  which  express  the  refractivity  of  two  gaseous  elements  in  the  region  of  the 
visible  spectrum,  and  let  MAB—  1  =  3  **  a  express  the  refractivity  of  the  compound 

~~ 


wliich   they  form.     If  the  molecules  of  the  two  elements  are  diatomic,  and  one 
molecule  of  the  compound  is  formed  of  one  atom  of  each,  then  the  change  of  refractive 

jx>wer  on  combination  is 

.  f    NA      (      NB    1         NAB 
'  In.^v-w8      «»'B—  n*J       WAB-W*' 


<>f  />/.<.•/  /r/-.s//v  I  '<  ,!<•<•  r.—  If  the  additive  law  were  strictly  followed  the 
dispersive  power  of  a  compound,  measured  in  a  region  remote  from  free  frequencies, 
would  lie  between  the  dispersive  powens  of  its  constituents,  i.e.,  HO'AB  would  lie 
Ix-tween  nj^  and  H^B.  For  it  can  be  shown  that,  for  a  short  region  of  the  spectrum, 
it-mote  from  free  frequencies,  so  that  n0a  is  large  compared  with  ;ta  and  n*jn*  can  be 
neglected, 


A      n  A      "o 


and  this  expression  lies  between  these  limits. 

Hence,  if  the  experimental  value  of  /iuaAB  differs  from  this  value,  the  variation  must 
be  due  to  the  changes  in  one  or  more  of  the  four  qiiantities  NA,  NB,  n/x,  n^a 
consequent  on  combination.  It  is  evident  that  all  four  unknown  quantities  cannot 
be  determined  from  a  knowledge  of  NAB>  ft,iaAB,  which  is  all  we  obtain  from  a  deter- 
mination of  the  dispersion  of  the  compound.  But  two  cases  should  IK'  distinguished. 
The  value  of  MU'AB  mav  vary  owing  to  changes  in  u/v  and  ti^B  consequent  on 
combination,  i.e.,  to  real  modifications  of  the  free  periods  of  the  vibrators  ;  or  it  may 

B  2 


4  MI:  n.m:  rrniMi-.KTsoN   \M>  \i.\n.i:  ITTIIKKKTSON  ON  Tin- 

be  ih-  t..  tin-  introduction  of  a  new  free  period,  or  the  elimination  of  an  old  our, 

previously  wrap|»-«l  up  i"  "A  •'«"''  "..V 

^    nnvtry  qf  HemJtf.  —  Before  proceeding  to  give  the  experimental  work  it  will  }>e 
eonvi-nii'nt  t<>  Niimmaris.-  tlie  results  obtained  :— 

(1)  In  hydrochloric,  hydrobromic,  hydriodic  acids,  sulphur  dioxide*  and  sulplm- 
n-tt.-d  hydrogen*  tin-  refractivity  of  the  compound  is  less  than  thr  sum  of 
tin-  ivtra<-tivitit-.s  of  tin-  tlt-im-nts,  and  the  dispersive  power  of  the  compound 
lie*  Ix-twccii  those  of  its  constituents  ; 

rJi  In  nitrous  oxide,  nitric  oxide,  ammonia,  and  ozone  the  refractivity  of  the 
compound  is  greater  than  the  sum  of  those  of  its  constituents,  and  the 
dispersive  power  is  greater  than  that  of  either  constituent  ; 

(3)  In  steam  the  refractivity  of  the  compound  is  less,  and  the  dispersive  power 

greater,  than  those  of  its  constituents  ; 

(4)  In  all  cases  the  change  in  dispersive  power  is  great  relatively  to  the  change  in 

refractive  power. 

We  hav«-  framed  a  hypothesis  which,  in  our  opinion,  would  account  for  these 
changes  in  a  qualitative  manner,  and  we  hope  to  puhlish  it  elsewhere. 

CHLORINE. 

-Tlie  refractive  index  of  gaseous  chlorine  has  only  been  measured 
IH-|...Mst   found   M-l==  "000772   for   white   light   with  gas,  prepared  from 
MnO,,  whose  density  was  2'  47  (air  l). 

MASCART}  found  „-!  ==  "000768  for  white  light.  He  worked  at  low  pressures  at 
tin-  temperature  12°  C.  and  compared  the  refractivity  with  that  of  air  under  the 
vuiie  condition.-,. 

ITie  dispersion  of  the  gas  has  not  previously  been  measured. 

-The  gas  we  used  was  prepared  by  dropping  strong  hydrochloric 

»  potassmm  jK-rmanganate.     After  washing  in  water  and  drying  by  sulphuric 

«™fe»ed  in  a  hath  of  acetone  cooled  with  solid  C02  and  then  allowed  to 

the  air  ,„  tl,,  oonn.cting  tubes  had  been  displaced.     The  refractometer 

My  ,-va,uated,  was  then  placed  in  connection  with  the  chlorine  by  a 

tube  so  fi,lt-  that   the  gas  entered  the  tube   sufficiently  slowly   for   the 

Wndn  to  be  ,ount,l.     When  the  pressure  of  gas  in  the  refLtometer 

-* 


;: 


l;|  ;i  -I:  ACTION  ANI>  IHSI'KKSIOX  OF  TIIK  HALOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  ETC.          5 

After  each  experiment  was  over  tl..-  -as  was  iiUirlied  over  soda  lime  and  only 
experiments  in  which  the  in.|..iriti.-s  were  negligible  were  used  in  determining  the 
refractive  index, 

The  light   used  WM  that  ..f  tin-  green  mercury  line,  A  = 

Refractivity.  The  following  figures  were  obtained  in  fire  experiments,  the 
experimental  values  U-iiig  reduced  to  <>'  <  '.  ami  7C,n  nun.  liy  the  formula  :- 

^  T      760 

»   -J73-T-' 

Ou-OlO7.     .     .     .     797«i,     7UK5,     7'J6«.     7'JKo,     7981.         Mean  7980. 

St.n.'i'ir'l  (  'onditiona.  'I'he  practice  of  reducing  observations  of  refractivity  to  the 
standard  temperature  of  .1  <  '.  and  the  pressure  of  760  mm.,  dates  from  a  time  when 
deviations  fn-m  the  laws  of  BOYI.K  and  GAY-Lrss.vr  were  alike  unknown.  As 
accuracy  improved  and  the  field  of  research  was  extended  to  vapours,  these  ,-/•//. 
became  insufficient  and  sometimes  meaningless.  MASCART,  the  volume  of  whose 
work  entitles  him  to  l>e  considered  the  leading  authority  on  the  subject,  at  first 
adopted  the  old  conditions,  and  even  in  the  OBM  of  SO,  expressed  the  refractivity  as 
it  would  lie  at  0°  and  760  mm.  But,  in  his  later  work,  when  dealing  with  chlorine 
..,„.!  bromine  and  with  some  organic  compounds  f,,r  which  the  coefficients  of  thermal 
expansion  and  compressibility  were  unknown,  be  contented  himself  with  determining 
the  refractivity  at  pressures  as  low  as  possible  and  comparing  it  with  that  of  air  at 
the  same  temperature  (12°  C).* 

LK  Roux,  in  bis  experiments  on  sulphur,  mercury,  phosphorus  and  arsenic 
expressed  the  ratio  of  the  refractivity  to  the  density,  and  LORENZ  and  PRYTZ  adopted 
the  same  system.  It  is  evident  that  this  principle  is  the  most  convenient  for  those 
who  wish  to  compare  the  refractivity  of  equal  numbers  of  atoms  of  different  elements, 
or  of  molecules  of  different  eomixmnds.  Accordingly,  in  the  present  work,  we  have 
reduced  all  ref  inactivities  to  the  values  which  they  would  have  had  if  the  gas  or 
vapour  had  the  density  of  hydrogen  at  0°  C.  and  76  cm.,  ('000089849)  gr./(cm.)- 
multiplied  by  the  ratio  of  the  theoretical  molecular  weight  of  the  substance  in 
question  to  that  of  hydrogen.  But,  in  order  to  avoid  confusion,  we  shall  denote  this 
value  by  the  syinlx>l  (M-l)  rP^r  ,  where  D  denotes  the  standard  density  as  here 


defined,  and  (<!„-,,,}  the  density  at  ()"  C.  and  7»i  cm 

The  density  of  chlorine  at  the  temperature  and  pressure  of  t  he  at  mospliere  has 
determined   recently  by  TI;I:  M.WKI.I.  and  CnRI8TIE.t     They  found  that  at  "J(f  C.,  the 
molecular  volume  W»fl  L'-jn:!-.!  and  liUOaO'O  at  10°  C. 

*  MASCAKT,  'C.  R.,'  v.,1.  s6,  pp.  :ii!l  and  lls-j. 

t  F.  P.  TRKALWELL  and  W.  A.  K.  CHKISTIK,  'Zcits.  aiiorg.  Chem.,'  Vol.  47,  p.  446,  19( 


Mi:.  CLIVE  CUTHBKRTSON  AND   MAUDE  CUTHBERTSON   ON   THE 


Tli--  average  temperature  of  our  experiments  was  19°'4  C.  and  at  that  temperature 
the  molecular  volume  of  chlorine  would  be  22038'9  c.c.  That  of  hydrogen  is 
•_'L'  1^8'8  c.c.  Hence  the  refractivity  observed  must  be  multiplied  by  the  ratio  of  these 
immlwrs.  We  thus  arrive  at  the  number  '00078412;  and  since  the  accuracy  of  the 
i-\|M-rinu*ut8  is  not  greater  than  1  part  in  1000  we  may  accept  '000784  as  the 
n-t'ractivity  of  chlorine  for  the  green  mercury  line. 

Dispersion. — Assuming  this  value,  the  dispersion  was  measured  at  seven  other 
points  of  the  visible  spectrum  by  the  method  described  in  previous  papers.* 

The  following  table  shows  the  results  : — 

TABLE  I. — Dispersion  of  Chlorine. 


Ax  10". 

D 

•<*») 

Observed. 

Calculated. 

Difference. 

6707-85 

77563 

77556 

_   7 

6438-5 
5790-5 
5769-5 
5460-7 
•  c'09-1 
5085-8 
4799-9 

77703 
78121 
78135 
78400 
78651 
78791 
79166 

77697 
78123 
78139 
78402 
78655 
78792 
79156 

-    6 
+    2 
+    4 
+    2 
+    4 
+    1 
-10 

The  numbers  shown  in  the  column  headed  "calculated"  are  derived  from  the 
formula 

(M_l)      D  7-3131x10* 

Kw)       9629  '4  xlO»-«»' 


„  i8  the  frequency  of  the  light,  i.e.,  =  X  -  _jxl°lu 

XX  (in  cm.) 

M^mW  ,o  -W^W-The  absorption  spectrum  of  chlorine  has 
-nveafgated  by  Ifa.  LA.RD.t     She  describes  the  spectmm  aa  con8isting  of 
»  of  general  abeorpt.on  which  extends,  in  a  column  of  gas  60  cm   long 
.50  to  A  2599,  and  lengthens  in  hoth  directions  with  increasing  preZa  but 

*  .L7     L8        ,          ^rangibk  6"d'  reaChi"«  X  4"°  "'  ^  25Z?2 
.pectrum  ly.ng  between  A  4799  and  X  5350  which  consists  of     *       of  da, 

*  fce  «Roy.  Soc.  Proe.,'  vol.  83,  p.  152,  1909. 
'Aatrophyi,.  Journal,'  14,  p.  85,  1901. 


INFRACTION  AND  DISPERSION  OF  THE  HALOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  ETC.          7 

The  region  of  which  the  refractivity  was  measured  by  us  extended  from  \  6708  to 
X  4799'9  and  thus  covers  the  whole  range  of  the  line  spectrum  and  200  A.U.  which 
are  affected  by  the  general  absorption. 

It  is,  therefore,  of  interest  to  find  that  the  observed  values  of  the  refractivity  lie  on 
a  smooth  curve.  But  it  is  significant  that  the  calculated  curve  cuts  across  the 
experimental,  in  which  the  curvature  is  greater.  This  appears  to  indicate  that  a 
single  term  formula  is  inadequate  to  express  the  results,  and  that  a  second  term  is 
required,  in  which  both  N  and  n*  are  small,  to  represent  the  influence  of  the 
absorption  band. 

In  the  region  of  the  line  spectrum  it  was  to  be  expected  that  if  any  variations  of 
refractive  index  accompanied  the  variations  of  absorption  they  would  be  found  either 
in  the  immediate  neighbourhood  of  each  dark  line  or  possibly  affecting  the  whole 
breadth  of  each  group  of  lines  forming  a  fluting.  In  order  to  investigate  this  point 
the  following  test  was  made : — 

The  paths  of  the  two  interfering  rays  of  light  were  equalised,  so  that  when  the 
wiive-length  of  the  light  employed  was  continuously  changed  from  red  to  violet  no 
rh.mge  was  observed  in  the  position  of  the  interference  bands  in  the  field  of  view. 
Chlorine  was  then  admitted  into  one  tube  till  the  path  of  that  beam  had  been  retarded 
by  450  bands  (\  =  5461).  Next,  by  means  of  the  compensator,*  the  same  beam  was 
accelerated  by  an  equal  amount.  If,  now,  the  wave-length  of  the  light  be  changed 
from  red  to  violet  any  movement  of  the  bands  would  be  due  to  the  difference 
of  refractivity  of  glass  and  chlorine  for  the  particular  wave-length  which  is  in  the 
field  of  view.  The  bands  can  easily  be  read  to  1/10,  so  that  when  450  bands  have 
passed  a  difference  of  refractivity  of  1/4500  can  be  detected. 

The  slit  was  then  narrowed  till  the  interference  systems  due  to  X  5790  and  X  5769 
were  clearly  separated  in  the  field  of  view  :  i.e.,  till  the  light  composing  any  particular 
part  of  the  image  varied  by  less  than  20  A.U.  On  changing  the  wave-length 
continuously  from  red  to  violet  no  sudden  change  in  the  bands  could  be  detected.  It 
may  therefore  be  concluded  that  between  X  6708  and  X  4799  any  sudden  change  of 
refractivity  exceeding  '000784/4500  =  '0000017  must  te  confined  to  a  breadth  of  less 
than  20  A.U.  and  probably  to  less  than  half  that  amount.  It  is  not  possible  to  detect 
small  changes  in  the  refractivity  in  a  narrower  section  of  the  spectrum  than  this,  since, 
if  the  light  is  sufficiently  dispersed,  it  becomes  too  feeble  to  read  tenths  of  a  I  >;i  i H  I. 

BROMINE. 

Previous  Work. — DUFKT  records  MASCART'S  value  n  =  1 '001 125  for  the  D  line. 
The  dispersion  of  the  gas  has,  apparently,  not  been  attempted. 

Preparation. — The  purest  bromine  obtainable  from  Kahlbaum  was  used.  Before 
every  experiment  the  bulb  containing  the  liquid  was  cooled  to  —80°  C.  and  exhausted, 

h  This  compensator,  of  special  construction,  retards  all  wave-lengths  equally  except  in  so  far  as 
dispersion  affects  them. 


MI;  n.ivK  r.rrm:i:i;is"V  .\\i»  MATDI:  CPTFIBERTSMN  ox  THK 


K>  as   i"  irt    ri.l    "I'  '  ''  H  Br  which  might   have  formed  since  the  previous 

experiment.     Sim-.-  it   was  neressary  for  the  gas  to  pass  through  greased  taps  more 

.•lal.T.it.    f.ivr.-niti.Hiis   f',,r  purification  would   have  l>een  useless.     The   grease   used 

s..      illv  prep        I  firoi      ;   .       paraffi  md  oil.       \tter  each  experiment  the 

uir    \\liirh    entered    the   refractometer   tube  was  admitted  to  contact  with  the 

iiry   and    alworhed.     Any   admixture   of  HBr  would  have  been  measurable  as 

hydrogen.     In  the  experiments  on  which  we  rely  to  obtain  the  index  the  residue  was 

negligible. 

/V...-.-I/I//V. — In  order  to  reduce  the  observed  refractivity  to  standard  conditions  it 
was  necessary  to  measure  the  density  of  vapour  employed.  For  this  purpose  the 
bulb  containing  tin-  liquid  was  connected  with  a  density  bulb  in  parallel  with  the 
refractomettT  tulx-  and  a  determination  of  the  density  of  the  vapour  accompanied 
each  experiment.  The  atomic  weight  of  bromine  was  taken  as  79'97  (O  =  16). 
Owing  to  the  great  al>sorption  of  the  vapour  in  the  green  it  was  necessary  to  use  red 
light  for  the  determination  of  the  absolute  index.  With  X  =  6438  as  many  as  80  or 
90  bands  could  be  read,  whereas  at  X  5461  the  band  system  was  no  longer  readable 
after  25  bands  had  passed. 

The  absolute  index  was  determined  from  the  following  five  experiments  which  were 
well  corroborated  by  several  others  not  quite  so  trustworthy  :— 

TABLE  II. — Refractive  Index  of  gaseous  Bromine,  X  =*6438. 


Experiment. 

(n      l\  10«      ^ 

Number  of  bands 
counted. 

\r      l)  lvr  ,1  ~Ci 

(«o<6) 

1 

1158 

55 

•J 

1156 

65 

3 

1154 

89 

4 

1159 

50 

;> 

1157 

cso 

Mean  .... 

1157 

Owing  to  the  strong  absorption  of  the  vapour  in  the  visible  region 
th-  dispersion  were  difficult,  and  the  accuracy  attained  was  much 
|t  -how,,  n,  the  case  of  chlorine.     The  following  figures  show  approxi- 
l«u,ds  winch  were  readable  at  different  points  of  the  spectrum  :- 
Number  of  bands 

readable. 
•     .     More  than  120. 


Ax  10*. 

.  7'  J 


,-, 
RM 


It 


120. 
115. 

90. 

60. 


A  x  10«. 
5600 
5461 
5209 
5085 


Number  of  bands 

readable. 
.     Less  than  30. 
•        ,,        „     25. 
„        „     20. 
10. 


REFRACTION  AM'  l>lsri;i;sl<>N  OF  Till.  1 1 A  LOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  ETC.         9 

Beyond  5461   the  number  of  Iwinds  read  was  not  sufficient  to  ensure  trustworthy 
values. 

The  following  table  gives  the  experimental  values  in  column  2  : — 

TABLE  III. — Dispersion  of  gaseous  Bromine. 


ILL      \\  107       P 

?              (4,76) 

Ax  10". 

Observed. 

Calculated. 

Difference. 

6708 

11525 

11518 

-   7 

6438 

11570 

11571 

+   1 

6000 

11662 

11675 

+  13 

5800 

11735 

11731 

-    4 

5750 

11741 

11746 

+   5 

5700 

11762 

11762 

0 

5600 

11796 

11767 

-29 

5461 

11849 

11842 

-   1 

The  experimental  numbers  fall  approximately  on  a  smooth  curve  which  is  given  by 

D  4'2838  x  10*7 


(M-!) 


(t/,,76)       3919'2  xlO*7-™3' 


The  figures  calculated  from  this  equation  are  given  in  column  3. 

Relation  of  Dispersion  to  Absorption. — As  in  the  case  of  chlorine  a  test  was  made 
for  a  rapid  change  of  refractivity  affecting  a  narrow  section  of  the  spectrum,  but  none 
was  detected. 

In  this  case  also  the  change  of  refractivity  is  small  compared  with  the  increase  of 
the  absorption  as  we  pass  from  the  red  to  the  green. 

IODINE. 

Previous  Measurements. — The  only  determination  of  the  refractive  index  of  iodine 
on  record  is  that  of  HURION,*  who  gives  M  =  1 '00205  for  the  red  and  1  '00192  for  the 
violet.  He  employed  a  prism  and  heated  the  iodine  to  700°  C. 

It  was  hoped  that  with  a  refractometer  a  higher  degree  of  accuracy  could  be 
obtained,  but  the  results  of  experiment  were  disappointing.  The  absorption  band 
which  has  its  maximum  at  X  5000  extends  so  far  into  the  red  that,  with  the 
faint  light  available  in  a  Jamin  apparatus,  the  band  system  was  very  soon 
obliterated. 

In  the  red  (X  =  6438)  as  many  as  21  bands  could  be  observed  with  difficulty,  but 


VOL.  ccxm. — A. 


*  'Journal  de  Physique,'  I.,  VII.,  p.  181. 
C 


10 


MR  CLIVE  CITHRERTSON   AND  MAUDE  CUTHBERTSON  ON    THE 


at  X  =  5600  it  was  not  possible  to  read  more  than  three,  and  on  the  violet  side  of  the 
region  of  absorption  no  measurements  were  possible.  In  attempting  to  measure  the 
dispersion  tin-  . -\IH-I  im.-nt.T  has  to  choose  between  a  small  number  of  bands  read  over 
a  sli^'htlv  wiili-r  range  and  a  larger  number  read  over  a  small  range.  In  either  case 
the  errors  of  observation  are  relatively  large. 

Procedure. — A  weighed  quantity  of  iodine  was  introduced  into  the  refractometer 
tube  which  was  evacuated  and  sealed  off.* 

The  tube  was  then  heated  till  the  solid  had  all  sublimed  and  the  bands  observed. 

Refraction. — The  wave-length  selected  for  the  absolute  determination  was  6438, 
and  this  was  obtained  from  white  light  of  a  Nernst  lamp  by  means  of  a  fixed  deviation 
spectroscope.  The  volume  of  the  refractometer  tube  was  49' 1  c.c.  and  the  weight  of 
iodine  which  it  contained  was  '00473. 

The  beet  experiments  gave  for  /u-1  the  value  '00210,  and  this  is  probably  correct 
to  1  or  2  per  cent.  It  agrees  well  with  HURION'S  value,  which  was  probably  for  a 
longer  wave-length  than  6438. 

Dwpemon. — Assuming  this  value  the  following  numbers  were  obtained  for  the 
refractivity  in  the  red-orange,  the  number  of  bands  read  being  97  for  X  =  6438. 

TABLE  IV. — Dispersion  of  gaseous  Iodine. 


Ax  10s. 

"-"""(W 

G438 

2100 

G280 

2100 

G150 

2150 

6100 

2180,  2170,  2140 

In  another  set  of  readings  the  number  of  bands  read  was  only  2'1  in  the  red,  and 
the  following  readings  were  taken  :— 

Xx,  0-  6708,      G438,      6215,      6,80,      5COO.      5250,      5,00,      5005,      5000 

0.-0.0-    .     ,970,      2100,      2,30,      2,30,      2170,      2250,      2210,      *1M,       2120. 

r  r  at  i~t  th« 

,  ,ug  an  absorption 

"ch  seems  to 


„, 


...  A,  vol.  204, 


REFRACTION  AND  DISPERSION  OF  THE  HALOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  ETC.        1  1 

It  was  not  considered  worth  \vhilr  to  s|x'ii<l  further  time  in  multiplying  observations 
which  could  never  command  great  confidence,  owing  to  the  fewness  of  the  bands 
read.  We  hope  to  return  to  this  rlnnent,  using  the  method  of  crossed  prisms,  which 
is  more  suitable  than  that  of  the  interferometer. 


HYDROCHLORIC  ACID. 

Previous  Determinations.  —  DULONG  obtained  1*000447  for  white  light,  and 
MASCART  1  '000444  for  the  D  line.  The  dispersion  has  never  before  been 
attempted. 

Preparation.  —  The  gas  was  prepared  by  dropping  sulphuric  acid  on  pure  sodium 
chloride.  After  passing  through  two  drying  bulbs  filled  with  sulphuric  acid  it  was 
condensed  in  liquid  air  and  allowed  to  boil  off.  When  the  gas  had  flowed  through 
the  connecting  tubes  for  15  minutes  so  as  to  displace  the  air,  it  was  admitted  to  the 
refractometer  and  allowed  to  flow  till  the  pressure  was  atmospheric.  The  following 
table  gives  the  experimental  values  found,  reduced  to  0°  C.  and  760  mm.  by  the 

formula 

/      .x    Tx760 
} 

Experiment     .         1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  G,  7. 

(,u-l)l07    .     .     4514,        4513,        4508,        4512,        4510,        4509,        4510. 

Mean  451  1. 

This  value  requires  correction  for  the  density  of  the  gas.  GRAY  and  BURT*  found 
that  the  volume  of  hydrogen  from  two  volumes  of  hydrochloric  acid  is  1'0079. 

LEDUC  gives  the  mean  coefficient  of  expansion  of  the  gas  at  constant  pressure  as 
•003736. 

The  average  temperature  of  our  experiment  was  16°  C. 

Hence  the  experimental  value  must  be  multiplied  by 

lx(l  +  16x'003736) 


1'0079  x(l  +  16  x  '00366)' 
whence  we  obtain 


Dispersion.  —  Assuming  this  value  the  dispersion  was  determined  from  six  experi- 
ments.    The  following  table  shows  the  results:  — 

*  'Trans.  Chemical  Society,'  95,  II.  of  1909,  p.  1604. 
C  2 


!•_•  \||;.  i  I.IVI-:  <rTlli;i.KTSON  AND  MAUDE  CUTI1BERTSON  ON   TIIK 

TABLE  V. — Dispersion  of  Hydrochloric  Acid. 


tlL       }}•*  10»        D 

(P     i)  x  iu     •  7«\ 

AxIO* 

Observed. 

Calculated. 

Difference,  3-2. 

6707-85 

44375 

44367 

-    8 

6438-5 

44444 

44437 

-   7 

5790-5 

44656 

44661 

+   5 

5769-5 

44666 

44670 

+    4 

5460-7 

44800 

44803 

+   3 

5209-1 

44930 

44933 

+   3 

5085-8 

45007 

44994 

-13 

4799-9 

45187 

45191 

+    4 

Using  the  SELLMEYER  form  of  equation  the  refractivity  is  expressed  by 

/   _!\P      _     4-6425  xlO27 

K76)       10664  xlO27-?^' 

Hie  values  calculated  from  this  expression,  in  which  the  constants  are  calculated 
from  the  observations  by  the  method  of  least  squares,  are  shown  in  column  3  above, 
and  the  differences  between  columns  3  and  2  are  given  in  column  4. 

HYDKOBROMIC  ACID. 

^  Prevwu*  Determinations.— M.ASGA.KT  obtained  M- 1  ==  "000570  for  the  D  line      The 
dispersion  has  not  been  attempted. 

/'reparation  -The  gas  was  prepared  by  dropping  the  purest  aqueous  solution  of 
.  phosphorus   pentoxide.     After   passing   through  tubes  containing  red 
>rus  and  phosphorus  pentoxide,  it  was  condensed  in  liquid  air,  sometimes  twice 
>met,mes  once  only.     !„  successful  experiments  the  acid  was  obtained  as  a  pure 
and  a  colourless  liquid.     After  an  experiment  the  gas  was  absorbed  over  a 
xia  hme  ,»  r^o.     Only  those  experiments  in  which  the  impurity 
ras^n.  ?lig,t  B  were  used  for  the  determination  of  the  index. 

adopted  fo 


Experimnit     .     . 
(M-l)lO'x-£- 


of  llydrobromic  Acid.     X  =  54G1. 
l>  2.  3,  4, 

6167,         6153,         6151, 
Mean  614y. 


6141, 


5, 
6139, 


6. 
6141. 


REFRACTION  AND  DISPKRSION  OF  THE  HALOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  KTC.       13 


l>i*persion.  —  Assuming  this   value  the  following   values  of  the   dispersion    were 
obtained  from  eight 


TAHLE  VI.  —  Dispersion  <>f  Jlydrobromic  Acid. 


Xx  10". 

/„     i\io»      D 

W«) 

Observed. 

Calculated. 

Difference,  3-2. 

6707-85 

60752 

60751 

-    1 

6438-5 

60878 

60873 

-    5 

5790-5 

61245 

61245 

0 

5769-5 

61256 

61260 

+   4 

5460-7 

61490 

61490 

0 

5209  •  1 

61704 

61710 

+   6 

5085-8 

618-j) 

61830 

+   6 

4799-9 

62160 

62149 

-11 

Using  SELLMEYEK'.S  formula  the  refractivity  can  be  expressed  by  the  equation 

_.v      D  5'1446  xlO-'7 

''(da76)      8668-4xl027-N,a' 

Calculated  values  are  shown  in  column  3  and  differences  in  column  4. 

Density  of  Itydrobromic  Acid. — As  the  density  of  the  gas  at  temperatures  higher 
than  0°  C.  does  not  appear  to  have  been  previously  measured  the  following  values  are 
perhaps  worth  recording.  The  degree  of  accuracy  was  not  carried  beyond  one  part  in 
a  thousand,  since  errors  in  reading  the  refractivity  were  not  less  than  this  amount. 

The  gas  was  weighed  at  atmospheric  pressure  and  the  temperature  of  the  room, 
which  averaged  19°  C.,  and  the  values  were  reduced  to  0°  C.  and  760  by  the  formula 

T        76 
D'  =  D*X273XP- 

Three  experiments  gave,  for  the  weight  of  a  litre,  on  these  assumptions,  3'648, 
:i '('•  17,  and  3'650  gr.,  the  mean  of  which  is  3'6484. 
The  theoretical  weight  is  :n>l(i:'.:!. 

HYDRIODIC  Acm 

Previous  Determination*. — MASCART  found  /x— 1  =  '000906  for  the  D  line.  The 
dispersion  has  not  been  attempted. 

Preparation. — The  gas  was  prepared  by  slowly  dropping  pure  aqueous  solution  of 


14 


Mi:    CLIVE  CUTHBERTSON   AND   MAUDE  CUTHBERTSON  ON   THE 


the  acid  on  phosphorus  pentoxide  and  proceeding  as  in  the  case  of  hydrobromic  acid. 
The  solid  obtained  on  free/ing  was  colourless,  but  the  liquid  was  usually  a  pale  pink, 
owing  to  a  trace  of  dissolved  iodine.  As  the  boiling  point  of  HI  is  far  below  that  of 
imline  the  quantity  of  iodine  subliming,  at  the  boiling  point  of  HI,  from  this  mixture 
was  negligible. 

Tests  for  impurity,  similar  to  those  in  the  case  of  HBr,  were  equally  satisfactory. 

Rtfractinty,  \  =  5461.  —  In  this  case  also  measurements  of  refractivity  had  to  be 
supplemented  by  those  of  density  as  this  has  not  previously  been  determined  carefully. 

In   three   trustworthy   experiments   the  following  figures  were  obtained  for  the 
refractivity  at  the  green  mercury  line  :  — 


a076 


.    .     .     .     9237,     9277,     9260.         Mean  9258. 


The  mean  is  taken  as  the  best  value. 

Dispersion.  —  From  seven  experiments  the  following  values  were  obtained  for  the 
dispersion  :  — 

TABLE  VII.  —  Dispersion  of  Hydriodic  Acid. 


AxlO8. 

(n     11  x  10s      ^ 

(476) 

Observed. 

Calculated. 

Difference,  3-2. 

6707-5 
6438-5 
5790-5 
5769-5 
5460-7 
5209-1 
5085-8 
4799-9 

—  •  

91087 
91334 
92087 
92106 
92580 
93015 
93257 
93900 

91089 
91335 
92080 
92109 
92572 
93016 
93259 
93905 

+  2 
+  1 
-7 
+  3 
-8 
+  1 
+  2 
+  5 

Using  SELLMEYER'S  equation  the  refractivity  can  be  expressed  by  the  formula 

Qu-1)     D  57900  xlO27 

K76)      6556-4  xlO"-n'' 

Fhe  calculated  values  are  shown  in  column  3  and  the  differences  in  column  4. 

**  of  Hydnodic  ^.-The  density  of  this  gas  also  has  not  been  accurately 
Umlated   m  the  same  way  as  in  the  case  of  hydrobromic  acid  three 
i  gave  for  the  weight  of  a  litre  5789,  5791,  5793,  mean  =  5791  gr 
we,ght  is  57151,  taking  H  ==  1'008  and  I  =  126-97,  and  the  weight 
ot  a  litre  of  oxygen  as  1  '4290  gr. 


REFRACTION  AND  DISPERSION  OF  THE  HALOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  ETC.       15 


STEAM. 

Previous  determinations  on  the  refractivity  of  water  vapour  are  given  by  DUFET 
as  follows  : — 


Observer. 

Light 

(/x-l)10«. 

FlZKAU  

D 

254 

JAMIN                     .... 

D 

257-9 

MASCART    

D 

257 

LORENZ  

D 

250 

No  one  appears  to  have  attempted  the  dispersion. 

Procedure. — A  weighed  quantity  of  distilled  water,  sealed  up  in  a  thin  capillary 
tube,  was  introduced  into  the  refractometer  tube,  which  was  then  evacuated  and 
sealed  off.  On  breaking  the  capillary  by  a  jerk  the  tube  was  filled  with  vapour. 
After  adjusting  the  tubes  between  the  mirrors  of  the  interferometer  the  centre  of  the 
tube  containing  the  water  was  first  cooled  to  a  known  temperature  and  then  the  tube 
was  heated  till  the  whole  of  the  water  present  had  evaporated.  To  the  number  of  the 
bands  read  was  added  a  proportionate  number  for  the  vapour  present  at  the  initial 
temperature. 

In  order  to  eliminate  the  errors  of  drift  other  experiments  were  made  in  which  the 
ends  of  the  tube  were  kept  near  the  maximum  temperature  required  (about  140°  C.) 
and  the  centre  of  the  tube  gradually  cooled  to  the  temperature  of  ice. 

Refractivity. — Experiments  were  made  with  four  charges  of  water.  The  results 
are  given  below  : — 

Kefractivity  of  STEAM. 


Experiment. 

^-1)10T^6' 

Approximate  numltcr  of 
bands  read. 

Remarks. 

(D 
(2) 
(3) 
W 

2523 
2491 
2534 
2524 

178 
379 
130 
300 

Mean  of  3  experiments. 

»        4          „ 
4 
»                     » 

>i        2            „ 

Mean  of  1,  3,  and  4  .     . 

2527 

It  will  be  seen  that  the  second  charge  yielded  results  considerably  lower  than  the 
other  three.  The  cause  of  the  discrepancy  was  found  to  be  the  unequal  distribution 
of  vapour  between  the  main  portion  of  the  refractometer  tube  aiid  the  small 
"  appendix "  left  when  the  side  tube  is  sealed  off.  When  the  temperature  of  the 
ends  is  markedly  higher  than  that  of  the  middle  (as  it  was  in  this  series),  the  error 
becomes  considerable.  Neglecting  this  experiment  we  take  the  mean  of  the  other 


I6  MR    n.lVK  PBTHBBMSON    AND   M AM-.:  CUTIIHERTSON   ON   THE 

thw,  M  the  value  for  the***  n.ercury  line.     The  variations  of  these  experiments 


t.^— ADBU1U  nif,       >  „  ,  j  ] 

from  seven  experiment*  with  the  largest  charge  of  water,  the  number  of  bands  read 
being  about  380  for  X  =  5461  :- 

TABLE  VIII. — Dispersion  of  Steam. 


AxlO». 

;       o-1)101^- 

Observed. 

Calculated. 

Difference,  3-2. 

6707-85 
6438-5 
5790-5 
6769-5 
5460-7 
5209-1 
5085-8 
4799-9 

25028 
25069 
25191 
25195 
25270 
25345 
25380 
25495 

25027 
25068 
25191 
25196 
25272 
25345 
25384 
25490 

-1 
-1 

0 
+  1 
+  2 
0 
+  4 
-5 

Using  the  SKI.KMKYEK  equation  the  refractivity  can  be  expressed  by 

,      ,s_D_        2-62707  x  10a; 
'd076  ~  10697  xlO27-?!2' 

The  numljers  calculated  from  this  expression  are  shown  in  the  third  column  and 
the  differences  between  column  3  and  2  are  given  in  column  4. 

OZONE. 

/'/•,/•/« I/.N-  II'.. rk. — No  previous  work  on  the  refractivity  of  ozone  is  recorded  in  the 
usual  books  of  reference.  The  difficulties  are  considerable.  It  is  impossible  to 
prepare  ozone  even  approximately  pure,  and  if  it  were  possible  it  would  be  inadvisable 
to  do  so,  since  the  decomposition  of  the  molecules  during  the  time  necessary  to 
measure  the  refraction  and  dispersion  would  introduce  fruitful  sources  of  error. 

fVponhtre. — Of  the  two  best  methods  of  preparing  the  gas,  electrolysis  of  a 
solution  <>f  sulphuric  acid  has  produced  the  highest  percentages  of  ozone,  FISCHER 
and  MASSENEZ*  having  obtained  over  28  per  cent,  by  weight.  But  the  objections  to 
this  method  seemed  to  us  to  outweigh  its  advantages.  It  was  necessary  that  the  gas 
used  should  be  absolutely  pure  oxygen,  for  the  smallest  trace  of  moisture,  air  or 
hydrogen  would  introduce  large  errors;  and  in  the  electrolytic  process  the  gas  is 

v  f  O 

produced  wet  and  is  mixed  with  air  in  the  connections.    For  these  reasons  the  method 
selected  was  that  of  ozonising  by  means  of  the  silent  discharge  in  a  vessel  of  the  type 

*  '  Zeit.  fur  Anorg.  Chemic,'  vol.  52,  p.  229,  1907. 


REFRACTION  AND  DISPERSION  OF  THE  HALOGENS,  HALOGKN  ACIDS,  ETC.       17 

used  by  BERTH  ELOT.  The  average  yield  was  6  per  cent,  by  volume,  but  on  one  or 
two  occasions  it  reached  10  per  cent.  We  failed  to  identify  the  causes  which 
produced  these  higher  yields,  and  were  unable  to  rejx-iit  them,  hut  succeeded  in 
obtaining  between  f>  ;tnd  7  per  cent,  with  fair  regularity. 

.Methods. — As  in  the  case  of  other  gases,  tin-  work  was  <li\'ul.-<l  into  two  part* 
(l)  the  determination  <>f  the  refractivity  for  a  single  wave-lengtli  (tin-  green  mercury 
line),  and  (2)  the  measurement  of  the  dispersion  in  the  visible  spectrum  relatively  to 
this  value. 

For  the  measurement  of  the  refractivity  two  methods  were  employed.  In  the  first 
of  these  the  quantity  of  ozone  present  was  estimated  by  destroying  the  ozone  by  heat, 
and  measuring  the  increase  of  the  gas  in  volume.  In  the  seco/id,  the  ozone  was 
estimated  chemically  by  bubbling  the  mixture  of  gases  through  a  solution  of  potassium 
iodide,  and  titrating  with  thiosulphate  of  soda. 

As  the  results  of  the  enquiry  were  remarkable  the  following  details  may  be  of 
interest : — 

Dry  oxygen,  prepared  by  heating  permanganate  of  potash,  and  stored  in  a  gas 
holder  over  mercury,  was  led  through  an  ozoniser  into  the  interferometer  tube,  whirl i 
was  previously  evacuated.  The  interference  bands  which  crossed  the  field  were 
counted  till  atmospheric  pressure  was  reached.  The  pressure  was  then  read  by  con- 
necting the  apparatus  with  a  mercury  manometer  filled  with  oxygen  and  separated 
from  the  ozonised  gas  by  a  long  capillary  tube.  The  temperature  of  the  water  bath 
was  observed  and  the  tap  which  led  to  the  refractometer  tube  turned  off.  Having 
again  evacuated  the  connections  the  gas  in  the  refractometer  tube  was  allowed  to 
flow  slowly  into  the  pump,  passing  through  a  spiral  of  fused  silica  heated  to  redness, 
which  effectually  destroyed  the  ozone.  From  the  pump  it  was  transferred  to  another 
gas  holder  over  mercury  and  thence  again  allowed  to  flow  into  the  refractometer  tube, 
where  its  temperature  and  pressure  were  again  measured.  If  V,  is  the  volume  of 
the  ozonised,  and  V2  that  of  the  deozonised  oxygen,  the  percentage  of  ozone  is  given 
by  V,— Vi  =  afVj/200.  In  the  present  case  V,  was  about  150  c.c.,  so  that  if  x  =  8  the 
total  increase  of  volume  is  6  c.c.  In  order  to  determine  the  value  of  the  refractivity 
to  1  per  cent,  it  is  therefore  necessary  that  the  total  error  in  pumping  the  gas  round 
the  cycle  should  not  exceed  '06  c.c.  In  practice  this  accuracy  was  not  quite  attained. 
It  was  necessary  to  grease  stopcocks  with  a  mixture  of  pure  paraffin  and  vaseline, 
which  will  not  hold  a  vacuum  indefinitely ;  while,  in  order  to  destroy  the  ozone,  the 
gas  had  to  be  pumped  through  a  spiral  12  inches  long  of  fine  capillary  bore,  which 
made  it  difficult  to  evacuate  the  last  traces  from  the  connections.  It  was  also 
necessary  to  know  the  refractivity  of  the  oxygen  very  accurately,  since  an  error  in 
this  figure  is  multiplied  in  the  ratio  of  100 fx.  After  a  sufficient  number  of  trials  had 
been  made  to  prove  that  our  oxygen  was  approximately  pure,  its  refractivity  was 
assumed  to  be  that  previously  determined  by  us,*  viz.,  /u— 1  =  '0002717.  X  5461. 

*  C.  and  M.  CUTHBERTSON,  '  Roy.  Soc.  Proc.,'  A,  vol.  83,  p.  151,  1909. 
VOL.  OCX  1 1 1. — A.  D 


I8  ME.  CLIVE  CUTHBERTSON  AND  MAUDE  CUTHBERTSON  ON  THE 

The  ftfewbg  are  the  details  of  a  typical  experiment  by  this  method,  in  which  the 
refractivit  y  of  the  deozonised  gas  was  separately  determined  :- 

Part  I   Refractivity  of  the  ozonised  oxygen- 

Bands  (A  =  54607)  489-9.      Length  of  tube  99786  cm.      Pressure   difference 
742-2  mm.  (corrected).     Temperature  16°'25  C. 

^T9xJUfi0'7  x  289-25  x  760  x  1Q-"  _  .0002909. 


99786  x  273  x  742'2 


Part  II.  Refractivity  of  the  deozonised  oxygen- 

Bands  474-2.     Pressure  difference  764'33  mm.     Temperature  14°  7  C.  ;  whence 
M_l  =  '00027193. 

Part  III.  Percentage  of  ozone— 

V,  =  764-33x289-25  =  ro95± 
V,  "     742-2x2877 

Thus  percentage  of  ozone  =  3'54  x  2  =  7"08. 

Part  IV.  Refractivity  of  pure  ozone— 

The  refractivity  of  the  mixture  is  the  sum  of  the  refractivities  of  its  components. 
Let  /KO,—  1  denote  that  of  pure  ozone,  then 

7*08  xta-l)  +  92-92  x  '00027193  =  100  x  "0002909, 
whence  ^,-1  -  '000539. 

By  this  method  the  following  results  were  obtained  :  — 

TABLE  IX.  —  Refractivity  of  pure  Ozone.     (First  Method.) 


Experiment. 

Percentage  of  ozone 
by  volume. 

Refractmty, 
(IL    TUO* 

Remarks. 

(W 

1 

9-5 

508 

2 

7-68 

543 

3 

7-08 

539 

4 

6-24 

511 

6 

6-24 

545 

6 

6-5 

560 

7 

3-5 

[585] 

Not  reliable,  percentage  of   ozone 

too  small. 

8 

8-72 

502 

9 

7-14 

497 

Mean  .    .    . 

525 

REFRACTION  AND  IMsl'KKSlON  OF  THE  HALOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  ETC.        19 

Second  method.  To  check  these  results  a  second  set  of  experiments  was  made,  in 
which  the  quantity  of  ozone  was  estimated  by  chemical  testa  This  method  was 
found  to  give  more  concordant  figures. 


TAISI.I:  X. — Refractivity  of  pure  Ozone.     (Second  Method.) 


K\|)t;riment. 

Percentage  of  ozone 
by  volume. 

Refractivity, 

Remarks. 

1 

G-09 

515 

2 

5-47 

521 

3 
4 

4-86 
6-40 

[495] 
522 

Not  very  trustworthy. 

5 

6-36 

530 

G 

7-08 

516 

Mean   .     .     . 

516-5 

The  results  obtained  by  the  two  methods  are  tolerably  concordant,  and  would  be 
even  better  if  the  third  experiment  were  omitted. 

Their  mean  is  5207,  but  having  regard  to  the  smallness  of  the  proportion  of  ozone 
present  it  would  be  unsafe  to  rely  on  this  number  beyond  the  second  significant 
figure,  and  we  therefore  conclude  that  the  refractive  index  of  pure  ozone  for  the 
mercury  green  line  is 

/x  =  1'00052. 

Comparison  with  the  Refractive  Index  of  Oxygen. — It  will  be  observed  that  this 
result  is  remarkable. 

The  refractivity  of  oxygen  is  '0002717,  and  if  the  third  atom  of  oxygen  on  joining 
the  molecule  had  the  same  refractive  effect  as  in  the  normal  gas  we  should  expect  a 
refractivity  (M-l)  107  of  $  x  2717  =  407 '5. 

The  experimental  value  520  is  very  largely  in  excess  of  this,  and  indicates  the 
existence  of  interesting  peculiarities  in  the  molecule  which  may  probably  be  ascribed 
to  the  linkage. 

Dispersion  of  Ozone. — Nine  experiments  were  made  on  the  dispersion  of  mixtures 
of  ozone  and  oxygen.  In  each  of  these  the  refractive  index  of  the  mixture  for  the 
green  mercury  line  was  separately  determined,  and  the  other  seven  refractivities 
were  calculated 'with  reference  to  it  from  the  observations  as  previously  described. 

The  first  experiment,  being  a  trial,  is  omitted,  and  the  refractivity  of  ozone 
calculated  from  the  remaining  eight  as  follows  : — 

D  2 


20  MR.  CLIVE  CUTHBERTOON  AND  MAUDE  CUTHBERTSON  ON   THE 

TABLE  XI.— Dispersion  of  Mixtures  of  Ozone  and  Oxygen. 


.    •  
Experiment. 

( 

/»-!)* 

lȣs- 

4,76 

Bands  read. 

6708 

6438 

DTM 

5770 

5461 

5209 

5085 

4800 

1 

28264 

— 

— 

— 

28533 

— 

28664 

— 

400 

28143 

28194 

28332 

28339 

28420 

28505 

28544 

28667 

491 

28509 

28554 

28698 

28707 

28789 

28879 

28926 

29061 

250 

28500 

28555 

28683 

28702 

28789 

28879 

28927 

29054 

491 

28499 

28543 

28692 

28701 

28789 

28870 

28919 

29050 

499 

i>:t7  1 

28416 

28556 

28562 

28648 

28735 

28785 

28915 

527 

•28'M>-> 

28410 

28553 

28559 

28648 

28737 

28782 

28910 

533 

8 

28368 

28412 

28549 

28552 

28648 

28726 

28781 

28909 

538 

9 

28624 

28667 

28785 

28810 

28898 

28988 

29038 

29172 

238 

Means  

28423 

28469 

28606 

28616 

28703 

28790 

28838 

28967 

RefractiTitiesofOs.  . 

26952 

26988 

27098 

27102 

27170 

27237 

27272 

27366 

Ref  [-activities  of  ()s.  . 

50764 

50968 

51514 

51624 

52000 

52375 

52621 

53290 

Adding  together  all  the  values  of  the  refractivities  for  each  wave-length  separately, 
and  dividing  by  the  number  of  experiments,  we  obtain  the  refractivities  for  the 
average  mixture  of  ozone  and  oxygen,  which  are  given  as  "means."  Assuming 
[MM^I"!!),  =  '000520  the  percentage  of  ozone  in  this  mixture  is  found  as  follows  :  — 

52Qx+(lOO-z)  2717  =  lOOx  287*03,     whence     x  =  6'1764. 

To  find  the  refractivities  for  the  other  seven  wave-lengths  we  have  only  to  use  this 
value  and  the  refractivity  for  the  corresponding  wave-length  of  oxygen  which  we 
take  from  our  previous  determinations,  vide  loc.  cit.  supra  p.  2.  Thus 


U-1JO.X6-1764  +  93-8236XU-1],,  =  [Mx-  1] 


mixture. 


Tin-  numbers  obtained  in  this  way  are  shown  in  the  next  line. 

It  is  at  once  noticeable  that  the  dispersive  power  of  ozone  is  much  greater  than 
that  of  oxygen.  And  here  again,  as  in  the  case  of  chlorine,  we  find  that  the  curvature 
of  the  experimental  curve  is  greater  than  that  calculated.  Using  M(J708-  1  and  M4800-  1 

we   obtain    the   formula   M-l  =  •   2  0414x  1Q!"        whence  we  find   , 

4221'3  x  10*7—  ?t*'  /*6 

whereas  the  experimental  value  is  52000. 

As  in  the  case  of  chlorine,  the  inference  is  that  a  second  term  is  required. 


KF.FRACTION  AND  DISPERSION  OF  THE  HALOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  ETC.       21 

AMMONIA. 

Previous  Determination.*. — Previous  determinations  of  the  refractivity  of  ammonia 
are  us  follows  : — 


Observer. 

Light. 

(M-l)10«. 

Corrected  for  density. 

BIOT  and  ARAOO    .    .    . 

DULONO    

White 

381 
383 

MASCART  

D 

377 

376  1 

LORENZ    

Li 

371 

D 

373 

373 

G.  W.  WALKER     .    .    . 

>i 

379'3±-5 

374-3 

It  would  occupy  too  much  space  to  analyse  the  causes  of  these  discrepancies,  which 
are  chiefly  due  to  differences  in  the  standard  conditions  assumed  and  in  the  coefficients 
of  thermal  expansion  and  compressibility  adopted.  But  the  figures  in  the  last 
column  give  approximately  the  figures  corrected  for  the  theoretical  density. 

Preparation.  —  Our  gas  was  prepared  by  warming  a  mixture  of  ammonium  chloride 
and  calcium  oxide  in  a  flask.  After  passing  over  red  hot  lime  and  cold  dry  lime  it 
was  condensed  at  —80°  C.  and  allowed  to  boil  off,  the  middle  fraction  being  collected. 
Three  samples  were  used. 

Calculation  of  Jtesitltx.  —  In  reducing  the  results  the  figures  given  below  were  used, 
following  GUYE*  :— 

Coefficient  of  thermal  expansion  (l  +  '003914<). 
Coefficient  of  compressibility 


l_£l£l  =  A  (/>,-»„),         A  =  -0002(1-  -0000030. 
Po»o 

Weight  of  a  litre  of  ammonia  at  0°  C.   and  760  mm.,  "7708  gr.      Theoretic 

density,  '7605  gr. 
Thus  the  equation  for  reduction  is 


D 

(dJG) 


NX  7605 
L  7708 


x  76 


W3914*, 


1  +  -003914*., 


where  N  is  the  number  of  bands  observed,  X  the  wave-length,  L  the  length 
of  the  tul>e,  and  ptp.»  ttt.2  the  initial  and  final  pressures  and  temperatures. 

Refraction. — The   determinations   for   X  5461    were,  as  usual,  made   by  pairs  of 
experiments,  witli  pressure  rising  and  falling. 

The  mean  of  nine  such  experiments,  whose  extremes  were  1 '0003782  and  1 '0003790, 


Me"m.  Soc.  de  Phys.  et  d'Hist.  Nat.  de  Geneve,'  vol.  35,  1908. 


22  MR.  CLIVE  CUTHBERTOON  AND   MAUDE  C0THBERTSON  ON  THE 

was  1-OU.M786.  Seven  of  these  were  at  room  temperature  and  two  at  0°  C.  We 
adopt  -0003786  as  the  refractivity  for  the  green  mercury  line. 

/L*r«on.-F.ve  experiments  were  made  to  determine  the  daemon. 

Thefbllowing  table  gives  the  mean  results  and  compares  the  observed  values  with 
those  calculated  from  the  formula 


)_          2-9658x10" 
~ 


8135-3 


which   was,  as  usual,   calculated   from  the  observations   by   the   method   of  least 

squares  :  — 

TABLE  XII.—  Dispersion  of  Ammonia. 


D 

(/*     1)  llr       ^      . 

XxlO». 

Observed. 

Calculated. 

Difference. 

6707-85 

37376 

37374 

-2 

6438-5 

37455 

37456 

+  1 

5790-5 

37701 

37700 

-1 

5769-5 

37707 

37710 

+  3 

5460-7 

37860 

37861 

+  1 

5209-1 

38002 

38006 

+  4 

5085-8 

38083 

38085 

+  2 

4799-9 

38300 

38295 

-5 

NITRIC  OXIDE.     (NO.) 
Previous  Work. — DUFET  gives  the  following  : — 


Light. 

Oi-l)10». 

Observer. 

White 
D 

302 
297-1 

DULONG. 
MASCART. 

Mr.  K  P.  METCALFE,  in  collaboration  with  one  of  us,*  obtained  293 '9  for  \  =  5893. 

The  gas  used  by  MASCART  had  10  per  cent,  of  impurity. 

Preparation. — Following  the  third  method  described  by  GUYE!  we  prepared  the 
gas  by  the  action  of  of  dilute  sulphuric  acid  (10  per  cent.)  on  dilute  nitrite  of  soda 
(6  per  cent.)  in  a  vacuum.  After  bubbling  through  concentrated  sulphuric  acid  and 
pawing  over  P,0t  it  was  condensed  in  liquid  air  and  fractionally  distilled.  The  gas 
employed,  tested  with  ferrous  sulphate,  showed  less  than  1  part  in  a  1000  of  impurity, 

1  CtJTHBiBTsoN  and  E.  P.  METCALFK,  '  Roy.  Soc.  Proc.,'  A,  vol.  80,  p.  406,  1908. 
t  Gtmt,  •  Mta.  Soc.  de  Phys.  ct  d'Hiat.  Nat.  de  Geneve,'  vol.  35,  p.  547,  1908. 


REFRACTION  AND  DISPERSION  OF  THK  HALOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  ETC.       23 


probably  nitrogen.     As  the  refractivity  of  nitrogen  is  almost  identical  with  that  of 
nitric  oxide  the  results  were  not  modified  by  the  impurity.     The  observations  were 

T^  7  f* 

reduced  by  the  m-dinary  formula  /*—  1  =  (v—  1)   -—-  x  —  . 

«/  t) 

Refraction.  —  Six  can-fill  double  experiments  (i.e.,  pressure  rising  and  falling)  gave 
Experiment    ....        1,          2,  3,  4,  5,          6. 

(M_1)K)'  -2959,     2957,     2952,     2955,     2951,     2956.          Mean  2955. 


We  adopt  this  mean  '0002955  as  the  value  for  the  green  mercury  line. 
Calculating  the  value  for  the  I)  line  from  this  value  and  the  dispersion  formula 
obtained  below  we  find  '0002944,  which  agrees  well  with  2939  found  in  1908. 

Diapernon.  —  From  five  observations  the  following  values  for  the  dispersion  were 

obtained  :  — 

TABLE  XIII.  —  Dispersion  of  Nitric  Oxide. 


XxlO». 

*•-«-*. 

Observed. 

Calculated. 

Difference. 

6707-85 

29306 

29302 

-4 

6438-5 

29344 

29344 

0 

5790-5 

29468 

29469 

-1-1 

5769-5 

29474 

29474 

0 

5460-7 

29550 

29553 

+  3 

5209-1 

29622 

29628 

+  6 

5085-8 

29666 

29668 

+  2 

4799-9 

29776 

29776 

0 

Using  SELLMEYEK'S  formula  the  results  are  expressed  by 

D  3*5210  x  10" 


'  K76)       122161 

NITROUS  OXIDE.     (N,O.) 
Previous  Work. — DUFET  gives 


Light. 

/*• 

Observer. 

White 

1-000507 

DULONO. 

Red 

1-000507 

JAMIN. 

6439-2 

1-0005132 

MASCART. 

— 

1-0005152 

it 

5378-9 

1-0005192 

« 

5086-1 

1-0005207 

i* 

4800-2 

1-0005230 

H 

M 


Mi;    U.IU.  (TTHBKRTSON  AND   MAUDE  CUTHBERTSON  ON  THE 


M  ,„  VKTS  gM  wm  pnfMd  from  ammonium  nitrate  Mad  itaim-,1  10  per  cent, 

of  impurity. 

The  gas  we  used  was  obtained  from  two  sources:  (l)  The  commercial  gas, 
obtained  in  cylinders,  condensed  and  fractionated  at  the  temperature  of  liquid  air,  and 
(2)  gas  prepared  by  the  action  of  ammonium  nitrite  on  hydroxylamine  hydrosulphate. 
It  was  bubbled  through  strong  potash  and  dried  with  sulphuric  acid  and  phosphorus 
pentoxide. 

/,'  t'l-.i.-tir,:  Index.—  Three  sets  of  experiments  on  different  samples  gave 


n 

Series. 

w*m\ 

Source. 

1 

5092 

Commercial. 

5102 

2 

5097 

» 

5098 

5099 

3 

5087 

From  hydroxylamine. 

5091 

Mean  .    .    . 

5096 

In  reducing  these  experiments  the  coefficient  of  thermal  expansion  used  was 
•00371. 

The  purity  of  the  gas  was  tested  by  absorption  in  an  excess  of  water  boiled  in 
vacua.  The  bubble  of  gas  left  unabsorbed  was  not  so  great  as  1/2000  of  the  whole  ; 
and  even  this  was  probably  due  to  the  error  of  the  test  experiment,  which  is  not  very 
easy.  But  as  traces  of  air  were  probably  present  we  think  5100  a  more  trustworthy 
value  than  the  exact  experimental  mean,  and  probably  correct  to  1/500  at  least. 

Dispersion. — From  five  experiments  the  following  values  were  obtained  for  the 
dispersion  : — 

TABLE  XIV. 


A  x  10«. 

(in     1HQ8     ^ 

\r      '/  *"    ,.  -„,• 
(Oo76) 

Observed. 

Calculated. 

Difference. 

6707-86 
6438-5 
5790-5 
5769-5 
5460-7 
5209-1 
5080-8 
4799-9 

50544 
50616 
50848 
50857 
51000 
51145 
51208 
51415 

50540 
50616 
50848 
50857 
51003 
51142 
51215 
51420 

-4 
0 

0     . 
0 
+  3 
-3 

+  7 
+  5 

REFRACTION  AND  DISPERSION  OF  THE  HALOGENS,  HALOGEN  ACIDS,  ETC.       25 

The  refractivity  can  be  expressed  by  the  formula 

i\D  5-6685  x  10". 

' 


Thr  calculated  values  are  shown  in  column  3  and  the  differences  in  column  4. 


ERRORS  OF  EXPERIMENT. 

Refraction.  —  In  the  determination  of  the  refractivities  for  the  green,  mercury  line 
the  principal  source  of  error  is  the  impurity  of  the  gas,  and,  in  the  case  of  vapours 
which  absorb  light,  such  as  the  halogens  and  sulphur,  the  limitation  of  the  number  of 
bands  which  can  be  read  before  the  light  fails. 

It  will  be  seen  that  experiments  of  a  series  generally  agreed  to  1  part  in  500,  and 
the  mean  is  probably  within  1  in  a  1000  of  the  truth.  In  iodine  and  ozone,  however, 
the  errors  may  amount  to  1  or  2  per  cent. 

Dispersion.  —  It  will  be  observed  that  the  values  of  the  refractivities  for  the  other 
seven  wave-lengths  are  relative  to  that  found  for  the  green  mercury  line. 

The  degree  of  accuracy  attainable  depends  on  the  number  of  bands  read  and  the 
dispersive  power  of  the  gas.  As  an  example  take  nitric  oxide. 

Here  O-l]*.^  =  '00029306,     Gu-l]A  =  4«o  =  "00029776. 

The  dispersive  power  is  297.^~^3<)6  =  2*™6  ;  and  if  400  green  bands  are  counted, 
the  number  which  represents  the  effect  of  dispersion  is  12ai,87Q7ua°  =  6'3  bands.  We 
consider  that  1/15  of  a  band  can  be  read;  so  that  the  value  of  the  dispersive  power 
should  be  correct  to  1  part  in  95.  It  may  be  assumed  that  by  determining  the 
constants  from  eight  independent  values  of  the  refractivity  instead  of  two  the 
accuracy  is  at  least  doubled,  and  the  error  should  not  exceed  1/200  of  the  effect 
itself. 

This  claim  is  supported  by  the  experimental  results.  Thus,  in  the  six  experiments 
from  which  the  dispersion  of  HC1  was  determined,  the  values  of  (/*&&—  /u^oo)  *  108  were 
816,  815,  813,  818,  805. 

In  eight  experiments  on  HBr  they  were  1370,  1388,  1393,  1356,  1372,  1376,  1368, 
1363. 

CALCULATION  OF  THE  CONSTANTS. 

The  calculation  of  the  constants  N  and  n£  of  the  formula  /*—  1  =  N/(«0a—  «2)  by  the 
method  of  least  squares  is  very  laborious  if  carried  out  in  the  ordinary  manner.  The 
following  modification  was,  therefore,  adopted.  Using  subscripts  to  denote  the  eight 
refractive  indices  and  their  frequencies  we  have  eight  equations  of  the  fonn 

_1_  -n:' 

M,-l  "        N 

..  VOL.  CCXIII.  -  A.  E 


RKFRACTloN   AN1»  I>!SN.I;>!<>\   Off  TIM-    HAl.ncl-VS,  IIALOCKN    ACIDS.  KTC. 
Suhtnii-tini,'  tli.'  (/,  f  4)"'  fn.ni  tin-  /<"'  equation,  we  obtain  four  equations  similar  to 

._!_—  LI  {»,•-»,•}. 

Mj-l       /u,-l        IN 

Ix.t  —  ---  —  be  expressed  by  x,  and  (nf-nf)  by  y,  and  similarly  for  the  other 

M»—  1      MI  —  1 
three  equations.     Then  it  can  be  shown  that,  applying  the  method  of  least  squares, 


N  =  2  (.r.  i/)/2  (x2),     and  hence     n»'  =  *N    2  -          +  2 


We  have  much  pleasure  in  recording  our  deep  obligations  to  many  friends.  To 
Prof.  TKOUTON  and  Prof.  A.  W.  PORTER  we  owe  most  grateful  thanks  for  their 
unwearied  patience  in  assisting,  guiding,  and  encouraging  us.  To  Prof.  N.  WILSMORE 
and  Dr.  WHYTLAW-GRAY  we  are  indebted  for  instruction  and  invaluable  help  in  the 
whole  of  the  chemical  side  of  the  work.  To  the  Royal  Society  we  owe  our  grateful 
acknowledgment  for  the  assistance  of  pecuniary  grants. 


II.    On  a  'V/.s.yYY//y/w  Reflector  with  Collected  Field. 
Dr.  R.  A.  SAMPSON,  F./t.S. 


Received  Decemlwr  28,  1912,—  Raul  February  13,  1913. 

THK  great  advantage  enjoyed  by  the  reflecting  telescope  is  its  equal  treatment  of 
rays  of  all  colours,  and  tin*  geometrical  defects  or  aberrations  of  its  field  are  less 
than  those  of  many  of  the  older  refractors.  The  most  serious  of  these  defects  is 
coma,  owing  to  which  different  /.ones  of  the  object  i\e  d<>  not  place  tlie  light  which 
they  receive  from  the  s'une  object  |>oint  symmetrically  around-any  common  centre  n 
the  image  area,  but  arrange  it  in  a  radial  fan  or  Hare,  the  light  from  the  outer  /.ones 
being  most  diffused  :  besides  spoiling  the  image  this  tends  to  neutralise,  for  any 
except  narrow  fields,  the  value  of  extended  a|)erture  in  the  objective  as  a  light- 
collector.  In  the  refractor  this  can  be  and  is  now  always  met  by  adjusting  the 
curves  of  the  two  lenses,  for  when  achromatism,  as  far  as  possible,  and  spherical 
aberration  are  allowed  for,  there  still  remains  one  unused  datum  ;  in  old  forms  this 
was  often  used  to  make  the  inner  curves  contact  curves  that  might  be  cemented 
together  if  it  was  convenient  to.  do  so,  but  it  is  properly  employed  to  extinguish 
coma.  But  with  the  reflector  the  case  is  different.  In  the  Newtonian  form  there  is 
only  one  available  surface,  and  when  this  is  made  a  paralxiloid  to  cure  spherical 
aberration,  nothing  is  left  to  adjust.  In  the  Gregorian  or  Cassegrain  forms  there  are 
two  curved  surfaces  and,  theoretically,  these  would  offer  means  to  correct  two  faults. 
An  illuminating  study  of  the  possibilities  of  a  system  of  two  mirrors  has  been  made 
liy  SCHWARZSCHILD  in  his  '  Untersuchungen  zur  Geometrischen  Optik';*  I  shall 
i  leal  with  its  outcome  below.  Its  general  tenor  is  comprehensive  and  exploratory 
rather  than  detailed,  and  it  remains  doubtful  whether  any  of  the  forms  which  he 
indicates  for  the  reflector,  at  the  point  at  which  his  research  stops,  could  actually  be 
made  successfully  upon  a  scale  that  would  show  their  advantages.  My  own  purpose 
in  the  present'paper  is  essentially  a  practical  one.  I  have  in  mind  throughout  a 
telescope  of  large  aperture  and  considerable  focal  length,  and  seek  to  devise  a 
correction  for  the  faults  of  its  field  which  shall  leave  its  achromatism  unimpaired, 
which  can  really  be  made  and  which  shall  effect  its  purpose  without  employing  any 
curves  and  angles  outside  those  that  are  already  known  to  work  well.  It  has  been 

*  '  K.  Gesell.  d.  Wissenschaften  zu  Gottingen,  Abhandl.  Math.-Phys.  Claase,'  Neue  Folge,  Bd.  IV.,  1905. 
VOL.  CCXIII.  -  A    498.  E    2  Published  Miparmtely,  April  18,  1918. 


!>K.    !,'.    A.    SAM  I  Si  )X    M\    A 

said  that  "an  ol.ject -glass  cannot  be  made  on  paper,"  but  the  possibilities  of  new  ami 
•.,n,|ili.-ated  .-onst ructions  must  in  all  cases  first  be  demonstrated  on  paper, 
.,;„  never  conveniently  vary  more  than  a  single   factor   at   a    time. 

Study  is  directed  N  the  Cassegrain  because  of  the  great  advantage  which  this  design 
possesses  in  shortening  the  tube  of  the  instrument  for  given  focal  length,  and  in 
placing  the  observer  at  the  lower,  in  place  of  at  the  upper,  end  of  it. 

The  best  introduction  to  the  subsequent  work  will  be  in  the  form  of  a  few  remarks 
upon   SCHWARZSOHII-D'S  results.     These  are  not  meant  as  a  complete  criticism  or 
estimation  of  it  but  are  merely  such  as  arise  naturally  in  relation  to  the  points  with 
which  I  deal  afterwards.     The  traditional  form  of  Cassegrain  telescope  consists  of  a 
great  concave  mirror  faced  by  a  small  convex  one,  which  is  placed  between  the  great 
mirror  and  its  princijxd  focus,  and  throws  the  image  out  through  a  hole  cut  centrally 
in   the  great  mirror.     The  small  mirror  increases  the  effective  focal  length  in  the 
ratio   of  its    distances    respectively   from   the   final   principal    focus  and    from   the 
principal  focus  of  the  great  mirror.      This  ratio  for  example  is   5 '4   in   the  great 
Melbourne  telescope,  3 J  to  4$  in  the  Mount  Wilson  60-inch  when  used  as  a  Cassegrain, 
and  it  can  hardly  fall  much  below  2£  unless  the  small  mirror  is  to  cut  off  a  dispro- 
portionate amount  of  the  area  of  the  great  mirror.     The  Cassegrain  is,  therefore, 
generally  speaking,  a  long  focus  instrument.    From  all  these  features  SCHWARZSCHILD'S 
forms  ditt'er  widely,  except  that  they  place  the  small  mirror  between  the  great  mirror 
and  its  principal  focus.     His  small  mirror  is  concave  in  place  of  convex,  and  shortens 
the  effective  focal  length,  bringing  the  beam  to  a  focus  between  itself  and  the  great 
mirror.    The  effect  of  this  change  in  design  is  to  render  possible  a  flat  field.    Spherical 
aberration  and  coma  are  removed  from  the  image  by  modifying  the  spherical  figures 
of  the   two   mirrors   into  definite  hyperboloidal  and  ellipsoidal  forms.     To    confine 
reference  to  the  case  which  he  considers  generally  the  best  (loc  cit.,  II.,  §11),  the 
necessary  deformations  are  given   respectively   by    bt  =  -13'5,    &2=+r97,  where 
- 1   would  deform  a  sphere  into  a  paraboloid.     The  image-surface  for  this  case 
would  In-  very  nearly  flat,  and  the  images  of  points  would  be  very  nearly  circles, 
.vhich  r.-ached  a  diameter  of  8  seconds  at  an  angular  distance  of  about  1  degree 
IVum  the  centre  of  the  field.     This  may  seem  somewhat  large  but  it  is  a  quantity 
proportional  to  the  aperture-ratio,  which  in  this  case  is  large  also,  namely  1  :  3'5. 
is  in   brief  a  very  rapid  instrument   of  short  focus  and  of  field  about 
1-le  to  that  of  a  good  long-focus  refractor.    The  chief  objection  to  it  is  found  in 
that  it  requires.     Until  some  one  turns  such  curves  out,  it  must  remain 
>l>"tl>er  it  is  feasible  at  all  to  make  the  construction  a  practical  success. 
VMWAK/.S,  HILD'S  analysis  is  the  use  of  a  concave  small  mirror.     This 
>  destroy  coma,  which  may  equally  be  removed  in  the  Cassegrain 
<".s  of  Ike  mirrors,  and  those  indeed  of  less  pronounced  degree  than 
n..ds  necessary.     But  as  will  be  shown  below  there  then  remains  a 
That  severe  and  irremovable  curvature  of  the  field 


MUM 


CASSEGRAIN  REFLECTOR  WITH  CORRECTED  FIELD. 

Tl»-  general  conclusion  which  I  «lraw  from  S,  ,,u  AR/SCHILD'B  investigation  is  that 
unification  of  the  two  mirrora  is  in  itsrlf  not  enough  to  give  a  practical  solut.on  . 
tl,,-   problem.     We  have  to  d.-:d    with  spherical  aberration,  coma,  curvature  of 
field    and  astigmatism.     Distort!,,,,  may  be  set  aside,  Wause  in  itself  it  does  not 
vitiate  the  image  of  a  point,  and  errors  which  it  introduces  into  relative  d.stano 
nrny  be  computed  and  allowed  for.     We  have  at  our  disposal  the  figures  of 
min-i-s  ,.,..1  their  separation  and  curvatures.     The  last  are  so  lock.,1   up  with  1 
kind   ,,f  t.-l.-s,-one  which  we  wish  to  produce  that   they  are  hardly  available 
...Ijnstment-if  we  want  a  short-focus  instrument  we  have  to  take  SCHWARZS,  .... 
choice   and  for  a  long-focus  one  the  Cassegrain  form.     It  turns  out  that  the  former 
of  these  may  have  a  flat  field  and  the  latter  must  have  a  curved  field  and  we  have 
to  rest  content  with  that.     And  with  respect  to  the  figures  of  the  mirrors  , 
within  our  control  to  say  whether  they  shall  offer  themselves  in  our  equations  i 
favourable  form  for  removing  undesired  terms ;    it  appears  from  the  reward 
they  appear  somewhat  unfavourably  entailing  the  use  of  surfaces  decidedly  far  1 
the  sphere.     It  is  my  object  to  obtain  a  workable  solution  and  not  merely  a  theor 
one    and  therefore  I  have  recourse  to  a  more  complicated  system,  by  passing  the 
beam  through  a  definite  set  of  lenses,  the  curvatures  of  which  are  more  or 
completely  at  our  disposal.     It  might,  at  first  sight,  appear  that  this  would  impa 
the  achromatism  of  the  reflector,  but  if  a  system  of  not  less  than  three  separa 
lenses  be  made  of  the  same  glass,  the  two  conditions  for  achromatism  at  a  give, 
plane  may  be  completely  satisfied,  equally  for  all  colours.     With  such  a  system  we 
can  produce  deviation  in  a  beam,  but  more  emphatically  we  can  produce  aberrat, 
The  details  at  which  I  arrive  are  given  on  p.  66,  and  need  not  be  repeated 
generally  the  plan  is  to  replace  the  convex  mirror  by  a  weak  convexo-concave 
silvered  at  the  back,  and  about  two-thirds  of  the  way  between  this  and 
of  the  great  mirror  to  place  a  system  which  I  call  the  Corrector,  being  a  pair  , 
lenses  of  nearly  equal  but  opposite  focal  lengths,  of  which  the  first  IB  double 
with  the  lesser  curvature  first,  and  the  latter  nearly  plano-convex. 

Choosing    the    curvatures    properly   a   telescope   is   thus   produced   which   gives, 
strictly  in  the  focal  plane,  an  image  free  from  chromatic  faults,  except  for  minute 
chromatic  residues  of  aberration,  from  spherical  aberration  and  from  coma,  and 
which  points  of  the  object  are  represented  in  the  image  by  spots  strictly  circu 
reach  a  diameter  of  2'2  seconds  at  a  distance  of  1  degree  from  the  centre  of  the 
The  givntrst  angle  of  incidence  upon  any  of  the  surfaces  is  11  degrees,  o 
than  alx>ut  two-thirds  of  what  is  customary  upon  the  anterior  surface  of 
lens  of  the  object  glass  of  a  refractor ;  all  the  surfaces  are  spherical  except 
the  great  mirror  which  is  intermediate  between  the  sphere  and  paraboloid,  and 
cannot  see  that  anywhere  any  serious  constructional  difficulty  is  introduced, 
effective  aperture-ratio  is  1  :  14'05,  or,  say,  about  1  :  15,  allowing  that      5  per  . 
more  light  will  be  lost  in  this  construction  than  in  other  possible  ones. 


30  DR.   R   A.  SAltfPSON  ON   A 

Tin-  iiictliinls  which  I  employ  are  those  of  a  memoir  recently  published.* 
SCHWARZSCHILD  usetl  the  Characteristic  Function.  Our  methods  thus  differ,  but 
since  aberrations  of  the  third  or  any  other  order  are  the  same  things,  no  matter  how 
they  are  obtained,  where  we  occasionally  touch  the  same  matter  the  differences  are 
at  most  those  of  notation,  and  occasionally  these  are  slight  ones.  I  have  not 
attempted  to  remove  them  because  it  seems  to  me  that  an  investigation  is  easiest 
to  read  if  expressed  in  notation  that  grows  naturally  out  of  its  own  processes.  I 
shall  therefore  adhere  strictly  to  the  notation  of  my  Memoir,  amplifying  its  results 
88  occasion  requires. 

We  may  take  for  reference  the  following  specifications  of  the  faults  of  an  optical 
field  at  its  principal  focus  in  terms  of  the  coefficients  <?,G,  &c.  :— 

a  =  semi-aperture. 
f  =  effective  focal  length. 

/3  =  tangent  of  inclination  of  original  ray  to  axis. 

Position  of  least  circle  of  spherical  aberration  .     .     .     Sf  =  +  f  /  V^G. 
Angular  radius  of  this  circle      ........     25783"  x  ^-  xa*K  G. 

t/ 

Comatic  radius    ............     1  03133"  x  ±  x  «/W,G. 

Secondary  focal  line  after  principal  focus      .... 


Primary  focal  line  after  secondary  .....  f'ffS.  H 

Radius  of  focal  circle  .....     103133"x  ^ 

Curvature  of  field  (convex  to  ray  if  positive)    .     .     .     (l/^ 
Distortional  displacement  ......     103133"x  (  1  //')  x 

......     (1) 

With  respect  to  these  it  may  be  explained  that  the  Comatic  Radius  is  the  radius  of 
>  around  which  rays  from  a  zone  of  radius  a  are  distributed,  the  centre  of  the 
circle  being  displaced  from  the  normal  image-point  by  an  amount  equal  to  its 
the  "secondary"  focal  line  is  the  line  in  the  plane  of  the  axis;  the  word 
ana  after,  in  the  order  in  which  light  reaches  the  points  ;  the  focal  circle 
cle  half  way  between  the  two  focal  lines,  through  which,  in  the  absence  of 
the  zone  would  pass  ;  the  curvature  of  the  field  refers  to  the  field 
the  focal  circles  of  all  object-points. 
Now,  if  we  secure  a  field  for  which 


=  0,      ......     (2) 

"A  New  Treatment  of  Optical  Aberrations,"  'Phil.  Trans.,'  vol.  212,  pp.  149-185. 


CASSEGRAIN  REFLECTOR  WITH  CORRECTED  FIELD.  31 

it  will  be  free  from  spherical  al>erration  and  from  coma,  and  the  images  of  points  will 
be  circles  in  the  plane  through  the  principal  focus,  the  radii  of  which  are  given  by 
1031  3.3"  x  (a  //')  x  /S^H.  If  <J,H,  which  by  (2)  is  made  equal  to  -S3G,  is  not  zero,  the 
instrument  will  be  successful  for  such  values  of  the  angular  radius  of  the  field  as  keep 
this  down  below  desired  limits.  These  conditions  give  the  objects  which  I  aim  at 
attaining.  Given  the  general  design  of  the  instrument  as  regards  apertures  and  focal 
lengths,  it  will  be  found  that  the  lens  which  is  used  as  a  mirror,  or  the  Reverser  as  I 
shall  call  it,  is  completely  determined  in  its  curvatures  by  the  conditions  for 
achromatism,  and  the  quantities  available  for  adjustment  are  the  figure  of  the  great 
mirror  and  the  curvatures  of  the  two  lenses  of  the  corrector.  These  are  used  to 
satisfy  rigorously  equations  (2),  and  the  essential  difficulty  of  the  problem  is  to  find  a 
case  among  the  great  number  of  those  that-  are  open  for  trial,  the  solution  of  which 
shall  prove  to  be  of  a  practical  kind,  not  involving  excessive  curvatures.  Once  an 
approximate  solution  is  obtained,  to  refine  it  only  requires  patience,  but  to  arrive  in 
the  neighbourhood  of  a  solution  is  a  problem  in  which  trial  needs  some  guide.  In 
this  connection  I  would  draw  attention  to  the  theory  given  below  of  the  Thin 
Corrector.  This  is  an  optical  system  of  two  or  more  thin  lenses  in  contact,  null  as 
far  as  deviation  and  colour  are  concerned,  and  introducing  aberrations  only  which  are 
available  for  correcting  existing  aberrations.  Thus  simplified,  it  is  manageable 
algebraically,  and  its  indications  will  show  the  possibility  or  otherwise  of  any  projected 
arrangement. 

If  we  denote  by  3)  the  curvature  of  the  field  and  by  $  PETZVAL'S  expression 


being  the  curvature  of  the  surface  (2r),  as  in  the  Memoir,  p.  162,  we  have 

Sa 


at    the    principal   focus  ;    hence   <$aH   which   gives   the   amount   of  astigmatism   is 
determined  by 

..........     (3) 


a  result  which  can  also  be  deduced  at  sight  from  known  expressions  for  astigmatism 
and  curvature  of  field  according  to  SEIDEL'S  theory.     In  the  special  case  of  a  flat  field, 

or  9J  =  0,  it  becomes 

........    .    (3A) 


and  this  may  be  taken  in  place  of  the  third  of  equations  (2)  as  one  of  our  necessary 
conditions.  We  notice  that  it  is  only  possible  to  control  the  astigmatism  through  the 
value  of  *JJ,  and  the  value  of  $  depends  only  in  small  degree  upon  the  distribution  of 
curvatures  between  the  two  faces  of  a  lens.  It  is  a  matter  then  of  the  general  design 
of  the  instrument  to  keep  SaG  down  to  a  suitable  magnitude.  This  presents  no 
difficulty.  I  have  been  content  to  keep  it  small  enough  for  my  purpose.  If  a  field  of 


DR   R.   A.  SAMPSON  ON   A 


radius  greater  than  1  <l.-^r«t-  \v«-iv  desired,  it  could  be  made  even  smaller,  but  it  would 
aeem  t»  involve  tin-  sacrifice  of  some  other  conveniences. 

Tli.-  v.-dii.-s  uf  tin-  quantities  <J,G,  &c.,  for  the  combined  system  are  built  up  step  by 
step  by  proceeding  from  surface  to  surface  or  from  lens  to  lens  by  the  sequence 
••qua  ti.  His  (17),  p.  160,  of  the  Memoir  referred  to  above.  For  making  these  steps 
it  is  not  convenient  to  lay  down  any  one  procedure  as  being  the  best  for  all  cases, 
but  two  methods  may  be  mentioned,  one  or  other  of  which  is  frequently  suitable. 
t  we  can  proceed  from  conjugate  focus  to  conjugate  focus,  the  first  focus  being 
the  principal  focus  of  the  first  or  great  mirror,  and  each  successive  conjugate  focus 
being  the  principal  focus  of  the  whole  combination  which  precedes  it.  That  is  to  say, 

at  each  stage  we  have 

g  =  0,         hk=  -1,         h'  =  0, 

so  that  the  equations  we  require  to  consider  are 


.     (4) 

In  these  fir',  ...  refers  to  the  new  or  added  element,  g,  ...  to  the  combination  from 
the  beginning  up  to  this  element,  and  G,  ...  to  the  resulting  combination  including 
this  element.  We  thus  notice  that  S,g  contributes  to  S,G  simply  by  multiplying  by 
flr',  which  is  the  magnification  of  the  new  element  between  its  conjugate  foci  under 
consideration.  We  notice,  too,  that  so  long  as  we  confine  ourselves  to  §,G,  the  only 
coefficients  which  it  is  necessary  to  find  for  each  added  element  are  SJi',  calculated 
between  the  same  conjugate  foci.  If  the  aberrations  of  the  second  element  are  given, 
referred  to  some  other  origins,  they  must  be  transferred  to  the  conjugate  foci  in 
question  by  means  of  the  equations  for  change  of  origin  (22),  p.  164.  A  case  will 
present  itself  that  requires  a  modification  of  this  process,  namely,  when  one  of  the 
conjugate  foci  belonging  to  an  element  introduced  by  one  of  the  steps  described  is  at 
a  great  distance  ;  to  meet  this  case  we  may  take  this  element  together  with  the  next 
following  m,e  and  combine  them  into  one  before  adding  them  to  the  combination,  or 
we  may  take  a  second  completely  different  method  as  follows  :  — 

Let  Ow  O.  be  the  initial  and  final  origins  ;  O0,  O0.  the  origins  to  which  the  known 
aberrations  of  a  part  of  the  system  are  referred.  Calling  {g',  h'  ;  k',  I'}  the  subsequent 
normal  system  O.-  to  O.,  transfer  the  aberrations  to  origins  Oa...OB  by  use  of  the  first 
part  of  ,.,,,,ati,,,,H  (17),  p.  160,  viz.,  S,G  =  g'Slg  +  h'Slk  .....  Then  caUing  {g,  h  ;  k,  1} 

•  pi-.-.-,-  ling  MMr.ual  scheme  O0  to  Oa,  transfer  the  so-found  coefficients  from  O.....O,, 
(  >.  by  using  the  forms  of  the  second  part  of  the  same  equations.  An  example 
«•»'  this  method  will  be  found  on  p.  55. 

We  now  study  the  formulae  for  thin  lenses.  It  will  be  pointed  out  later  how  to 
make  use  of  these  when  the  lenses  are  thick. 


CASSEGRAIN   REFLECTOR  WITH  CORRECTED  FIELD.  33 

Thin  tenses. 

The  atarration  coefficients  for  a  single  surface  are  given  in  the  Memoir,  p.  161  ; 
iff  =  (l-n)  B3,         *#  =  0,         r^/  =  0,         V  =  (  I  -n)  B,         SJi  =  0,         3Ji  =  0, 


,V  =  (l-n)(-l+n-na)Ba,  <V  =    -n"(l-n)B,        3J  =   -n(l-n'),    .     .     (5) 

where  I  have  written  e  =  1  —  e,  so  that  e  =  0  for  a  spherical  surface,  and  «  =  1  for  a 
paraboloid. 

Both  origins  are  at  the  surface,  and 

g  =  l,         h  =  0,         k  =  (n-1)  B,         /  =  n,         )  =  £,         n  =  ju_,/ix+,. 

The  case  of  the  thin  lens,  with  origins  at  its  surface,  is  derived  from  this  hy  an 
application  of  equations  (17),  p.  160. 
Write 


then 


*       nl  '  "  \       n 


&&  =  0,         ^  =  0, 

i^h  =  -kn  =  -<),  SJi  =  0,         ^  =  0, 


V  =  0  ...........     ...     ......     ....     (6) 

It  may  be  mentioned  that  B,  the  curvature,  is  positive  when  the  convex  face  is 
presented  to  the  ray. 

It  seems  unnecessary  to  give  the  algebra  leading  to  these  expressions  in  all  cases. 
It  is  quite  straightforward,  and  that  for  <J,&,  which  is  relatively  long,  may  be  taken 
as  a  model.  From  the  Memoir,  p.  160,  we  have,  taking  <5,K  to  refer  to  the  joint  effect 
of  the  two  surfaces 


f  +  P3JV}  +  k{$/ 

VOL.  CCXIII.  —  A.  F 


I)R   R   A.   SAMPSON  ON   A 
It  i.  **  that  the  ten,,,  in  ,,  i  come  to  the  value,  Biven.     Leaving  these  aside 


n  n 


This  appears,  multiplied  by  -(1  -»)  B  +  B',  and  added  to  Wtf  +  W,*  which  is 


n 
the  whole  is 


n 

~  n?  n9 

+  B*    x      -3(l-n)(\-n  +  n3). 

This  may  be  written 


=     K'+KX 

where 


X  =  nBM-rr 


This  is  the  given  expression  if  finally  we  write  small  letters  for  capitals. 

It  will  be  noticed  that  q,  which  contains  the  reference  to  the  distribution  of 
curvatures,  apart  from  their  effect  upon  focal  length  only  presents  itself  in  the  forms 
in  which  it  is  introduced  by  Slk,  Stg.  It  is  somewhat  remarkable  that  the  same  is 
true  when  we  have  any  number  of  thin  lenses  in  contact.;  thus,  if  we  have  a  system 
of  thin  lenses  in  contact,  giving  a  set  of  coefficients  S&,  ...,  and  add  a  single  thin  lens 
to  it  for  which  we  have  Stf,  ...,  then,  noticing  that 


CASSEORAIN   KKFLKCTOR   WITH   CORRECTED  FIELD.  35 

we  have 


**»',        V*  =  J.G  =  0, 
J,H  =  Sfi  +  Sfi  =  -)>-»>'  =   -#,        A.H  =  J,H  =  0, 


where  E  is  the  sum  of  terms  in  e,  e'  for  each  of  the  lenses  ; 


^,L  =  4,K-K$  =  K'-K'P-i.G, 

J,L  =  ^K-9  =  K,        ^3L  =  0  .............    (8) 

Thus,  to  form  the  coefficients  cS,G,  ...  for  any  system  of  thin  lenses  in  contact,  we 
require  to  know  only  the  forms  for  ^,G  and  <5,K.  I  add  the  forms  of  these  for  three 
lenses, 


-k")  tf  +  l(2k+2V  +  U')(k  +  V)tf'.   .     (9) 

From  these,  if  necessary,  the  general  case  may  be  written  down  by  analogy  without 
much  difficulty,  e.g.,  in  (5,K  the  coefficient  of  Jj>'</'  '8  three  times  the  k  of  the 
preceding  system  minus  the  X:  of  the  following  system  ;  but  I  shall  not  require  more 
than  three. 

We  may  employ  these  equations  where  we  require  to  obtain  algebraically  rough 
but  reliable  indications  of  the  properties  of  a  given  actual  system.  Thus,  consider 
the  aberrations  of  any  set  of  thin  lenses  in  contact,  at  their  principal  focus,  that  is,  at  a 
distance  —  K"1  beyond  their  common  surfaces.  We  must  form  S{T  =  <5,G—  K~M,K,  ... 
where  ^G,  ...  are  the  quantities  just  found  which  refer  to  the  surfaces  of  the  lenses  as 
origins.  Hence  for  example,  referring  to  p.  30,  we  see  that  the  radius  of  the  focal 

F  2 


DR.   R    A.   SAMPSON  ON   A 

....... 


of  vature  i.  a.ways  al»ut  two-fifths  of  the  focal 
IWS,'''o.,,,.lition  for  d-.»  of  coma,  .bid.  »  ™,ally  ftiw  as  ABBB'S  Sine  Condition, 
"^  to  P1"  0  =  Kl,r  =  KWJ-a,K  =  ,1,0-K'  ; 

in-thb  the  right-haml  member,  apart  from  the  foeal  length,,,  is  a  linear  function  of  the 

quantities  q. 

The  condition  fur  absence  of  spherical  aberration  is 


0  = 


which  is  a  quadratic  function  of  q,  ...  . 

A  numerical  example  of  the  use  of  such  approximations  will  be  given  later. 

It  is  necessary  to  deal  with  express  care  with  the  case  of  the  mirror.       t  may  1 
treated  as  a  single  surface  for  which  n  =  -1,  and  then 


^  =  -2(3-e)B8,    SJc--    -2B2,     ^-  =  0, 

A,/  =  -SEP,         .y  =  -23,    .y  =  o, 

but  this  leaves  the  positive  axis  after  reflection  opposite  to  the  direction  of  the  ray. 
It  is  better  to  reverse  the  direction  of  the  axis,  and  this  may  best  be  done  by 
multiplying  by  the  scheme  {g,  h;  k,l}  =  {!,*  ;  *,  -1},  and  gives  the  following  set 
to  represent  the  mirror  :  — 

0  =  1,  A=0,  *  =  2B,  Z=+l,  J>=-2B, 

i0  =  2BJ,  ^  =  to  =  °.  M  =  2B,         V*  =  XJt  =  0, 

i,Jt  =  2(3-e)B»,  ^fc  =  2B»,  ^Jfe  =  0, 

SJ  =  6BS,  «V  =  2B,  ^  =  0,  ...........     (10) 

the  signs  of  all  terms  in  k,  I  being  reversed  by  this  step,  while  g,  h,  \>  remain 
unchanged.  Notice  that  the  convention  for  the  sign  of  B  has  not  been  altered,  so 
that,  e.g.,  for  the  concave  mirror  B  is  negative,  and  the  new  value  of  k  =  (1—  w)B  is 
negative  also. 

If  we  write  J,Jb  =  Jfc*+fcx+E,  we  must  put  x  =  —it*. 

Besides  the  simple  mirror  I  shall  have  also  to  deal  with  the  system  consisting  of  a 
meniscus,  silvered  at  the  back.  Such  a  system  1  shall  call  a  lleverser.  For  neglected 
thickness  the  coefficients  follow  readily  from  the  case  above  (p.  35),  of  the  juxta- 
position <.f  thmr  thin  lenses,  replacing  the  middle  lens  by  a  mirror,  and  taking  for 


CASSEGRAIN  REFLECTOR   WITH  CORRECTED   FIELD.  37 

the  third  lens  the  original  lens  with  the  surfaces  in  reversed  order.  This  reversal 
of  order  will  replace  B,  B'  respectively  l>y  —  B',  —  B.  Hence  k,  )  will  equal  k",  J>" 
respectively,  but  q  +  q"  =  0. 

in  the  •  ions  (9),  using  '  to  denote  the  mirror  surface 


•     .     (11) 

Thr  same  expression  is  true  of  a  more  complicated  reverser  of  any  numl>er  of  thin 
lenses  with  the  last  surface  silvered.     Also 


(12) 


To  conclude  this  preliminary  discussion  of  systems  of  thin  lenses  in  contact  I  shall 
introduce  a  system  which  consists  of  two  thin  lenses  in  contact,  of  equal  and  opposite 
focal  length  and  of  the  same  glass,  and  therefore  a  null  system  in  every  respect 
except  for  aberrations.  The  use  of  such  a  system  will  l>e  illustrated  hereafter.  Its 
simplicity  is  such  that  its  aberration-coefficients  reduce  to  very  easy  forms,  and  can 
therefore  be  handled  algebraically  in  an  experimental  investigation,  in  order  to 
discover  what  system  will  correct  the  aberrations  of  a  proposed  system  ;  it  will 
supply  a  useful  approximation  to  a  solution  when  any  less  idealised  system  is  too 
complicated  to  manage. 

From  the  expressions  (8)  we  have  for  the  Thin  Corrector 

K  =  k  +  k'  =  0,         $  =  kn  +  kn  =  0, 


k  (k-k')k'n 

.....     (13) 


and    all    the    rest   of    the    coefficients    run    in    agreement    with    p.    35,    so    that 


38 


|iK.    K.    A.    SAMPSON    <>\    A 


<J,K  =  <5,L  =  -iiG  and  the  rest  are  zero.  These  are  the  values  at  the  surface  of  the 
corrector.  \V«-  notir.-  that  all  are  zero  when  qjk  +  q'jV  =  0,  that  is,  when  the 
curvatures  of  the  two  surfaces  in  contact  are  the  same. 

In  onli-r  t<>  illustrate  the  manner  of  using  these,  for  example,  let  it  be  proposed  to 
timl  the  curvatures  of  a  corrector,  which  when  interposed  at  a  given  point  of  an 
aherrant  beam  shall  produce  assigned  changes  in  it.  Let  this  place  be  at  a  distance 
v  befon>  the  beam  comes  to  its  focus.  After  passing  through  the  corrector  it  will 
still  come  to  a  focus  at  the  same  place,  so  that  applying  the  formulae  of  the  Memoir, 
p.  164,  (22),  we  have  for  the  distances  from  the  first  conjugate  focus  to  the 
corrector  d  =  r,  which  is  negative,  and  from  the  corrector  to  the  second  conjugate 
fo<-us  d'  =  —r,  and  transferring  from  the  surface  of  the  corrector  to  these  conjugate 
foci,  we  have 


where  <J,y,  J,*  are  written  for  the  values  of  ^G,  <5,K  given  in  (13). 

We  must  now  apply  the  formulae  (4)  of  p.  32.     For  the  corrector  g'  =  1.     Let  the 
assigned  changes  be,  say, 

A,,  =  4G-4gr,         A,  =  89G-S#, 
so  that  the  equations  (4)  of  p.  32  give 


therefore 


J.A3.     .     (14) 

From  these  equations  the  values  of  the  curvatures  of  the  two  lenses  may  be  found 
with  the  help  of  equations  (13).  An  example  of  their  use  will  be  found  below,  on 
p.  44. 

In  connection  with  the  question  of  assigning  a  system  which  will  produce  definite 

may  I*  remarked  that  it  is  not  difficult  to  solve  the  equations  (17)  of 

.  Menu,,,-  so  aa  to  give  explicitly  either  S>g, ...  or  *J,  ...  so  that  we  have 

>-s.r,d  either  the  antecedent  set  or  the  consequent  set  which  combine  to 

.il«rat,on  coefficients  J.G, ...  .     The  former  are  obviously  obtained  by 

J    '  Mi    '^L'  -^«G+^K'  -WH-AL,  which  give  respec 
^.»U»Un'V     For  the  latter  coefficients  V,.-    we  form 


CASSEGRAIN   REFLECTOR  WITH  CORRECTED   FIELD.  39 

which  give  <$,«/,  t\h'  ;  and  similarly  we  have  $}tf,  <?,/'.     Form  also 
-/<M,G  -I-  (gl  +  f,k)  S,G-gk<\G  =  ...+«» 


-hlSt  1  1  t  .  .  . 
and 


AM.H-... 


\\  itli  similar  equations  in  it.K,  iT.L.  These  equations,  for  example,  answer  the  question 
df  what  al>errations  are  shown  when  a  known  system  is  reversed  and  presented  with 
the  opposite  face  to  the  beam,  the  unit-points  Iwing  simply  interchanged  so  that  the 
normal  effect  as  shown  in  the  position  of  the  focus  is  the  same  as  before.  For  if  an 
unaherrant  heam  originating  ;it  <•  is  Drought  to  a  focus  at  ()'  and  shows  there 
aberration  ooaffioienta  <\y,  ...  ;  or,  what  is  the  same  statement,  an  alwrmnt  )>eain  with 
coefficients  Stg,  ...  emerging  from  (V  and  passing  through  the  system  in  the  opposite 
direction  is  brought  to  an  unaberrant  state  at  O,  then  if  Stgf,  ...  are  the  coefficients 
introduced  by  the  reversed  passage  we  have  the  joint  effect  of  A,^,  ...  superposed  to 
•\{j,  ...  is  null,  or  <^,G,  ...  are  all  zero.  But  it  must  lie  noted,  as  was  pointed  out  for 
the  mirror,  that  as  the  direction  of  the  axis  is  reversed  the  signs  of  c$,£...<y  must  be 
reversed  before  they  are  brought  into  the  equations  with  <?,0r',  ...  ;  further,  since 
G  =  1,  H  =  0,  K  =  0,  L  =  1,  we  have  gf  =  /,  It'  =  -li,  k'  =  -k,  I'  =  g,  and  n  =  1. 
The  whole  question  has  some  general  interest,  but  I  shall  not  pursue  it  further  at 
present,  because  it  is  somewhat  beside  our  mark,  and  I  return  to  considerations  that 
bear  upon  the  main  problem. 

Coming  now  to  the  immediate  object  of  my  paper,  which  is  the  Cassegrain 
telescope,  I  shall  first  consider  what  can  be  effected  with  two  mirrors  simply,  which 
will  give  opportunities  for  writing  down  useful  expressions  of  various  forms  relating 
to  mirrors. 

A  mirror  with  both  origins  at  its  surface,  and  the  reversal  included,  gives  the 
scheme  (10)  p.  36,  or  say 

g  =  1,     h  =  0,     k  =  k,     1=1,    p  =  —k, 
where  k  =  2B,  together  with  the  aberration  coefficients 

#»,  0,  0;     *,  0,  0;     i(2  +  e)i3,  &*,  0  ;     $k>,  kt  0  .....     (16) 
With  the  surface  for  one  origin  and  the  principal  focus  for  the  other,  these  become 

g  =  o,     h  =  -k~l,     k  =  k,     1=1, 
with  the  coefficients 

-bk3,  -££,  0;     -i*.  -1,  0;          ibid.      ;          ibid  .....    (17) 
It  by  the  formulae  of  the  Memoir,  p.  164  (22),  we  transfer  the   origins  to  two 


40  DR.  R.  A.   SAMPSON  ON  A 

conjugate  foci,  P,  P  respectively,  say  at  distances  PO  =  u,  OP'  =  v  along  the  ray 

from  tli«-  surface,  so  that 

u+v  +  kuv  =  0 

—where  it  IB  to  I*  noted  that  the  positive  direction  for  both  u  and  v  is  the  direction 
of  the  ray,  which  is  reversed  at  the  surface,  so  that  if  P,  P'  are  found  upon  the  same 
side  of  the  mirror  u  and  t'  will  have  the  same  sign — we  have  the  scheme 

g  =  l+hv,     h  =  0,     k  =  k,     1=1  +ku, 
\sitli  tli.'  roftHcifiita 


ie)].      (18) 

To  obtain  the  system  for  a  Cassegrain  telescope,  we  must  combine  two  systems, 
(gfi...),  (grT...),  as  in  the  Memoir,  p.  160  (17),  of  which  the  former  gives  the  great 
mirror  at  its  principal  focus,  by  (17)  above,  while  the  latter  gives  the  second  mirror 
between  two  conjugate  foci,  by  (18).  Let  AC,  e  refer  to  the  great  mirror,  and  /,  e'  to 
the  second  one.  If  we  confine  attention  to  spherical  aberration,  coma,  curvature,  and 
astigmatism,  it  will  suffice  to  form  ^G,  (5aG,  <$;,G  for  the  compound  system,  deriving 
<J,H  with  the  help  of  the  equation  (5;,G—  ^H  =  H$.  The  resulting  expressions  are 


(53G  =  -K'V/^I-K'U  O  +  sVI  +  ieY'ttV  [l  -KuJ/K,  (19) 

with 


The  quantities  e-l,  e'-l  are  what  SCHWARZSCHILD  calls  the  deformations  of  the 
mirrors,  from  spherical  figures;  when  e  =  0,  or  the  deformation  =  -1,  we  have  a 
paraboloid  ;  if  we  choose  them  so  as  to  annul  coma  and  spherical  aberration  we  have, 
from  the  equations  S3G  =  0,  «J,G  =  0  respectively, 


while  if  we  eliminate  e  from  S3G,  we  get 

Curvature  of  field  =    -K 


=  llu  +  K'u{l+K(-u+v)}/v, 
and 


(20) 


.CAS8EGRAIN  KKFLECTOR  WITH  CORRECTED  FIELD.  41 

These  expressions  are  identical,  except  for  notation,  with  results  given  by 
SCHWARZSCHILD  ;  they  contain  the  complete  theory  of  the  Cassegrain  combination, 
corrected  by  figuring  for  coma  and  spherical  aberration,  except  as  regards  distortion, 
and  this  could  i-asily  I"1  added  by  calculating  •>'.  II. 

\\.  read  IV.  mi  <-<\\i:i\  i»ns  (L'n)  tliat  l'»i  a  ^i\.-n  d.-i^n  ••!'  in-t  ruiii.-nt ,  as  -|..-.-iti.-d  in 
the  values  of  *,  *',  u  at  r,  we  can  adjust  the  figures  of  the  two  mirrors  so  as  to  annul 
spherical  aberration  and  coma  at  the  principal  focal  plane,  and  then  the  curvature  of 
the  field  and  astigmatism  amount  to  determinate  quantities.  Coma  is  annulled  only 
f«>r  the  purpose  of  getting  a  larger  field  for  photography,  and  there  is  very  little  use 
in  annulling  it  if  the  field  possesses  pronounced  curvature,  or  in  less  degree,  if  the 
focal  circles  are  not  reasonably  small.  Hence  the  practical  questions  are  :  can  the 
design  be  made  such  that  curvature  is  nearly  absent  and  astigmatism  small,  and 
can  the  corresponding  values  assigned  to  the  deformations  be  realised  in  practice  ? 
All  these  questions  are  treated  more  or  less  explicitly  by  SCHWAIIZHCHILD,  and  I 
shall  traverse  the  ground  again  only  in  order  to  connect  the  problem  with  its 
subsequent  development  and  bring  out  the  points  which  I  require. 

Itegarding  the  expression  for  curvature,  v— u  is  the  positive  distance  from  the 
principal  focus  of  the  great  mirror  to  the  principal  focus  of  the  combination.  In 
the  Cassegrain  form  the  latter  point  is,  as  a  rule,  not  far  beyond  the  surface  of  the 
^n-at  mirror,  so  that  v— u  is  not  far  from  the  focal  length  of  the  great  mirror  and 
I+K  (—?*  +  »')  will  be  a  small  fraction  ;  also  K'U  is  numerically  less  than  unity.  Hence 
the  curvature  of  the  image  will  differ  very  little  from  1/w,  the  reciprocal  of  the 
distance  from  the  second  mirror  to  the  principal  focus  of  the  great  mirror,  a  distance 
which  would  seldom  be  more  than  one-third  or  one-fourth  of  the  focal  length  of  the 
great  mirror,  or  one-tenth  to  one-twentieth  of  the  focal  length  of  the  combination. 
The  common  Cassegrain  is  subject  to  the  same  objection.  The  values  of  its  errors 
may  l>e  read  from  the  equations  (19)  on  p.  40,  if  we  have  the  means  to  determine  e,  e'. 

As  an  illustration  we  may  take  the  great  60-inch  reflector  of  Mount  Wilson 
Observatory,  which  can  be  used  either  as  a  Newtonian,  with  a  focal  length  of 
25  feet,  or  in  three  different  forms  as  a  Cassegrain ;  taking  the  form  designed  for 
direct  photography,  it  has  an  effective  focal  length  of  100  feet,  so  that  v/u  =  —4. 
If  we  take  the  final  focus  at  the  great  mirror,  which  is  nearly  the  case,  we  have 
u  =  —  5,  v  =  +20,  and  K  =  +3/20.  Now  since  the  telescope  is  corrected  as  a 
Newtonian,  the  great  mirror  is  parabolic,  or  e  =  0 ;  and  therefore  taking  it  as 
corrected  for  spherical  aberration  as  a  Cassegrain,  ^-eVw  =  1,  or  e'  =  —16/9,  which 
is  a  hyperboloidal  form,  the  deformation  from  a  sphere  being  nearly  three  times  that 
which  would  produce  a  paraboloid.  Substituting  ^eVttu  =  1  in  the  equation  for  SaG, 
we  have,  after  some  reductions,  ^aG  =  £ru/r  =  —  ^K,  or  the  coma  of  such  an 
arrangement  is  the  same  as  for  a  simple  mirror  of  the  same  focal  length.  Also  we 
find  (?:1G  =  —15,  $3G— <SSH  =  — 11,  so  that  the  radius  of  curvature  of  the  field  is 
one-nineteenth  of  the  focal  length  or  about  5^  feet  only.  As  to  the  astigmatism 

VOL.  CCXIU. — A.  O 


42  DR.  R.   A.  SAMPSON  ON  A 

w«  have  <J,H  =  -4,  wlii«-li  may  be  compared  with  (53H  =  -1  for  a  Newtonian, 
l»ut  since  the  aperture  ratio  aff'  is  diminished  in  the  ratio  1  :  4  by  the  increase  of 
effective  focal  length,  the  radii  of  focal  circles  at  all  distances  from  the  centre  of 
the  field  will  have  the  same  angular  amount  that  they  had  in  the  Newtonian  form, 
neitluT  more  nor  less.  There  remains  then  only  the  above-found  curvature  of  the 
field  to  notice.  Taking  as  a  convenient  mark  a  distance  34''3  from  the  centre  of  the 
field,  namely  where  /3  in  the  formulae  of  p.  30  equals  one-hundredth,  we  should  have 
at  this  point  the  field  curved  back  from  the  plane  through  the  principal  focus  by 
more  than  one  inch.  In  spite  of  this  pronounced  curvature,  exquisite  photographs  of 
the  Moon,  as  well  as  of  small  objects  like  Mars,  have  been  obtained  with  this 
telescope  in  Cassegrain  form.  The  photograph  of  the  Moon  (R.A.S.  photographs, 
No.  214)  appears  to  me  second  only  to  the  Yerkes  photographs  with  the  40-inch 
refractor  and  colour  screen  ;  but  technically  it  would  lie  more  instructive  to  examine 
a  photograph  of  a  wide  field  of  stars. 

It  is  worth  while  to  demonstrate  that  curvature  of  the  field  cannot  be  removed  by 
replacing  the  second  mirror  by  a  set  of  lenses  in  contact,  used  as  a  reverser,  as 
explained  on  p.  37.  By  such  a  replacement  we  introduce  the  quantity  $  which,  for  a 
given  focal  length  of  the  reverser,  is  adaptable  by  throwing  different  proportions  of 
the  deviation  of  the  rays  upon  the  lens  system  and  silvered  surface  respectively. 

Then  using  the  formulae  (4)  of  p.  32,  in  which  we  may  put  hk  =  -1,1=  l,k  now 
referring  to  the  great  mirror  and  *•  to  the  reverser  x 


where,  if  Jjy,  ...-*  refer  to  the  reverser  at  its  surface, 


by  (11),  p.  37, 


Thug 

m 
Eliminate  ft,*...)  by  forming 


CASSEGRAIN   REFLECTOR  WITH  CORRECTED  FIELD.  43 

Now  &&  =  —%k,  3&  =  0  ;  and  if  by  figuring  or  otherwise  we  annul  coma,  so  that 
G  =  0,  we  have 


Also 
so  that 

also  K  =  kj(f  =  —ku/v  ;  so  that  the  curvature  is 

lv  ......    (21) 


If  we  compare  this  with  the  expression  given  in  (20)  above  we  see  that  the  sole 
effect  of  the  change  is  to  replace  the  reciprocal  of  the  focal  length  of  the  second 
mirror  by  (2/c  +  ir)  for  the  reverser,  and,  since  its  factor  in  u,  v  is  small,  this  change 
will  not  allow  any  considerable  modification  of  the  curvature  of  the  field. 

To  meet  the  difficulty  of  curvature  SCHWARZSCHILD  considers  a  design  of  instrument 
fundamentally  altered.  Thus  in  (19)  the  curvature  of  the  field  will  vanish  if 

K  =  -v/ua{l+K(-u+v)} 

and  this  may  be  secured  if  K'  is  negative  as  well  as  K,  or  if  the  second  mirror  is  concave  ; 
but  in  order  that  the  curvature  of  the  mirror  may  not  be  too  great  we  must  then 
take  I+K(—  u  +  v)  sensibly  different  from  zero,  and  also  v/u  the  magnification  of  the 
second  mirror,  not  too  large.  The  system  to  which  SCHWARZSCHILD  is  led  as 
generally  the  best  to  be  found  under  such  conditions  has  been  already  described 
(p.  28).  It  is  so  different  from  anything  that  has  yet  been  made  that  it  must  be 
regarded  merely  as  an  interesting  exploration  of  the  possibilities  of  the  theory  until 
an  attempt  is  made  to  realise  it.  In  particular  it  is  utterly  different  from  the  long- 
focus  Cassegrain  which  I  have  in  mind,  and  therefore  I  shall  not  require  to  refer 
to  it  further. 

Returning  to  the  question  of  the  Cassegrain  proper  we  see  that  if  an  improvement 
is  to  be  made  it  must  be  by  inserting  a  corrector  of  some  form  in  the  course  of  the 
beam.  Hence  we  come  to  the  system  which  I  have  indicated  on  p.  29.  To  get  an 
approximation  to  what  is  required,  suppose  that  the  reverser  is  merely  a  convex 
mirror,  that  the  corrector  consists  of  a  pair  of  thin  lenses  of  which  the  theory  is  given 
on  pp.  37  and  38,  and  that  all  the  surfaces  are  spherical  except  that  of  the  great 
mirror  which  is  figured  so  as  to  annul  spherical  aberration.  To  fix  ideas  I  shall 
suppose  that  the  unit  of  length  is  100  inches,  and  that  with  this  unit  the  aperture  of 
the  great  mirror  is  0'40  and  its  focal  length  2'0000,  also  that  the  separation  of  the  two 
mirrors  is  1'3333,  that  the  magnification  of  the  second  mirror  is  2  '4,  from  which  it 
results  that  its  focal  length  is  l/'875  =  T1429,  and  the  principal  focus  of  the  combina- 
tion is  thrown  beyond  the  great  mirror  by  '2667,  at  a  distance  T6000  from  the 

a  2 


]>i;    R.    A.   SAMPSON   ON  A 

id  mirror.  It  will  be  seen  from  the  expressions  (14)  that  it  is  desirable  that  the 
corrector  should  lie  as  far  as  practicable  from  the  principal  focus  if  its  aberrations  are 
to  be  as  small  as  possible,  that  is  to  say,  if  its  curves  are  to  be  as  shallow  as  possible. 
It  cannot  be  too  far  forward  or  it  will  cut  off  some  of  the  rays  coming  from  the  great 
mirror  to  the  revereer.  It  appears  that  a  convenient  distance  is  O'OOOO  from  the 
revereer,  or  07000  from  the  principal  focus.  That  is  to  say,  in  the  formula;  (19)  of 
p.  40, 

*=-'5000,     «'=+-8750,     w=-'6667,     v=+l'6000, 

so  that,  with  e'  =  1  ,  for  a  spherical  reverser, 

3.jg  =  +  '3383,        S.&  =  -3-0301. 
Now  we  have  to  make 

S3G  =  Q,       $,G+4H  =  0, 
and  we  have 

<J,G-4H  =  H^  =  +4'8000  x  -'3750  =  -1'8000. 

Hence  the  changes  A,,  A3,  which  the  corrector  must  introduce,  are  respectively, 

A2=-'3383,         As  =+2-1301. 

These  are  the  quantities  so  denoted  in  (14)  p.  38.  In  the  same  equation,  the 
values  of  k,  I  to  be  used  come  from  the  scheme  resulting  from  the  combination  of  the 
two  mirrors,  viz., 

g=          ,    h  =+4-800,     £=-'2083,     I  =  +2'1667, 
and  v  giving  the  position  of  the  corrector  with  respect  to  the  principal  'focus, 

v  =  -7000. 
Hence 

A-'A,  =  +  1  -6238,        ko  A3  =  +  -3  1  06, 
H*-+-S160,     (!-«,)-»  =  1-4620,     (-2  +  Mv)/(l-Uv) 
(-3  +  4klv)/(l-klvY  =  -37107, 

Ay=  -1-6238-  '4541  =  -2'0779, 
A*  =  -17472-1-1525  =  -2'8997. 

**  for  •  thin 


]  =  +2-0779 


CASSEGRAIN   REFLECTOR  WTTH  CORRECTED  FIELD.  45 

In  order  to  secure  shallow  curve-,  the  quantities  t//i,  </'/*'  should  be  as  ninull  as 
possilile.  It  is  therefore  evident  that  *rr  should  be  taken  negative,  that  is  *  positive. 
The  actual  value  of  K  the  reciprocal  of  the  focal  length  of  each  member  of  the 
corrector  has  now  to  be  chosen.  By  increasing  K,  q,  q1  will  l>e  made  smaller  but  at 
the  Hum R  time  the  lenses  emplnynl  will  be  shortened  in  focus.  As  a  reasonable  trial, 
take  K  =  +1*4286,  so  that  KV  =  —  1,  and  the  focus  of  the  combination  of  the  two 
mirrors  is  also  a  focus  of  either  lens  of  the  corrector ;  then  taking,  say, 

M  =  1*5200,     n  =  '6579,     7i(l+2n)/4(l+n)a  =  '13857, 
we  have 

q/K+q'/*'  =  +6-3168, 

9/*-tf/*'  =  -2*1809, 
or  the  equations  give 

q/K  =  +2-0680,         qf/K'  =  +4'2488. 

The  curvatures  of  the  lenses  are  now  found  from 

,  =    l-lW-B'4)  =  +1-4286, 


q  =    1  +±    (B4  +  B'4)  =  +2-9543, 

\      nl 

or 

B4=  -7875,         B'4  =  +1-9597, 
and 

/       i\ 

--    (Bg-B',)  =  -1-4286, 

nl 


q'  =    l+  +  B-.)  =  -6-0697, 

\      nl 

or 

B«  =  +'1698,         B',  =  -2-5779. 

These  results  are  a  very  fair  approximation.  The  final  solution,  when  the  thick- 
nesses and  consequent  separations  of  all  the  lenses  are  allowed  for,  as  well  as  the 
introduction  of  a  third  weak  lens  in  the  reverser  to  preserve  achromatism,  with 
resulting  change  in  the  focal  length  of  the  second  lens  of  the  corrector,  is 

B4  =  -'6930,         B'4  =  +2-0482, 
B,  =  -'0242,         B',  =  -2-6120. 

The  first  lens  is  a  double  concave,  the  radii  of  its  two  surfaces  being  1'270  and 
0*510  respectively;  the  second  is  double  convex,  with  radii  5*907  and  0*388.  The 
remaining  astigmatism  is  measured  by  the  value  of  (5jH,  which  by  p.  44  is  +0"9000, 
which  is  about  the  same  as  the  residual  amount  present  in  the  focal  plane  of  a 


46 


DR.   K.   A.   SAMPSON  ON   A 


refracting  d..ul»lrt.  These  are  all  reasonable  amounts,  so  that  we  are  now  in 
possession  of  a  good  approximation  to  a  workable  solution  which  corrects  coma  and 
.  urvature  of  the  field,  and  leaves  the  figure  of  the  great  mirror  to  correct  spherical 
aberration. 

It  only  remains  then  to  adapt  this  solution  to  include  consideration  of  all  the 
secondary  factors  that  have  been  left  on  one  side. 

We  must  now  turn  to  the  question  of  achromatism  in  general.  A  thin  corrector, 
such  as  is  contemplated  on  p.  37,  is,  among  other  properties,  achromatic  ;  but  when 
the  lenses  are  made  thick  and  their  unit  points  separated,  as  must  be,  to  make  the 
system  real,  this  property  is  lost  in  greater  or  less  degree.  With  two  lenses  only  it 
is  not  possible  to  restore  it  completely.  Reserving  the  quantities  q,  q'  for  adjusting 
aberrations,  we  may  alter  the  ratio  k  :  kf  from  the  value  —1,  but  this  gives  only  one 
adjustable  element,  whereas  there  are  two  necessary  conditions  for  achromatism 
for  any  specified  position  of  the  object,  namely,  identical  position  for  the  image  and 
identical  magnification.  It  is  true  that  in  the  ordinary  achromatised  refractor, 
consisting  of  a  doublet,  results  are  obtained  with  satisfaction  of  only  a  single 
condition,  but  the  achromatism  secured  is  necessarily  very  imperfect  for  another 
reason — the  imperfect  rationality  of  the  dispersions  of  the  two  kinds  of  glass — 
and  this  masks  the  neglect  of  the  second  condition.  For  the  reflector,  where  we 
aim  at  perfect  achromatism,  we  must  add  a  third  lens  to  supply  an  additional 
adjustable  element.  I  shall  now  give  the  theory  of  complete  achromatism  at  a 
chosen  point  with  three  lenses  of  the  same  glass,  separated  by  given  distances.  To 
make  all  the  lenses  of  the  same  glass  secures  achromatism  for  all  colours  if  it  is 
attained  for  any  two.  The  lenses  are  supposed  thin,  and  the  results  must  therefore 
be  considered  merely  as  approximations,  since  the  thickness  will  alter  the  positions 
of  their  unit  points  as  well  as  their  focal  lengths  when  a  ray  of  different  refractive 
index  is  considered.  But  the  approximation  will  be  generally  close,  and  an 
illustration  of  how  to  make  a  complete  adjustment  will  be  given  later. 


>  lenses  be  placed  at  O,,  04,  0,  and  produce  images  in  succession  at  P3,  P8,  P7 

" ln  the  ^  Then  the 


CASSEGRAIN   REFLECTOR  WITH   CORRECTED  FIELD.  47 

Write 

O,O4  =  <*3,     O4O.  =  d4, 

PA  =  "i,     0,Ps  =  7i3;        P,04  =  v,,     04P6  =  u&;        ¥fi.  =  vtt    O.P7  =  ult 
also 

F,),       x4  =    l- 


then  we  have  the  equations 

0, 

XjVjttj  =  0, 

=  0; 


and  the  linear  magnification  is  equal  to 

-(ttj/W,  ).(«,/''»)•  (W"*)- 


Varying  the  system  with  respect    to    1/n,  the  refractive   index,  and    making  a 
condition  that  v,,  M7,  and  the  magnification  are  unchanged,  we  have 


=  0, 
=  0, 


and 

/M6—  Arj/t's  =  0  ; 


eliminate  A?<3,  Ac&  and  this  gives 

Ai»,  (!/«,+  !/»,) 
eliminate  Av3,  A7<6  and  we  have  the  two  equations 


A-c, 
finally 


or  ....     (23) 


thus,  knowing  c£3,  fi6,  r,,  and  choosing,  say,  *„  we  determine  in  succession  «,  the  value 
of  the  ratio,  Ug,  «6,  x4,  va,  «7,  xa.     But  this  choice  and  order  is  open  to  modification. 
For  example,  if  we  take,  as  on  a  subsequent  page, 


t=  +'9261,     dj=  -K01G94,     tt3=+r6000,     x4=+l'4286, 


4g  pi:.  R   A.   SAMPSON  ON   A 


„  =  -'01056,         *=  -1-3704. 

This  is  an  illustration  of  the  simple  corrector  (,,-*  in  contact)  modified  by  a  slight 
separation  of  the  two  lenses  and  completed  by  the  addition  of  a  weak  lens  „  at  a 
considerable  distance,  and  adjusted  for  a  point  which  is  nearly  at  the  principal  focus 
,  ,f  t  he  middle  lens.  The  exact  solution  on  pp.  51-53,  gives 

,,=  -'01152,         *.=  -  1-3459; 

the  differences  are  considerable  ;  this  must  be  expected  because  the  thicknesses  of  the 
lenses  are  of  the  same  order  as  the  separation  d,  of  the  unit-points  ;  but  in  all  cases  the 
solution  will  be  close  enough  to  supply  a  good  approximation  that  will  allow  the  actual 

case  to  be  adjusted. 

The  general  process,  suitable  for  use  when  we  have  obtained  an  approximation  by 
the  method  just  explained,  will  be  the  following.  Let  the  standard  scheme  and  that 
of  the  varied  refractive  indices  be 

{G,    H;    K,    L}        and        {G+AG,    H  +  AH;    K+AK,    L+AL} 

respectively.     Then  the  conditions  for  complete  achromatism  at  the  principal  focus 

are  simply 

AG  =  0,         AK  =  0, 

for  these  imply  that  the  focal  length  is  unchanged  and  also  the  distance  —  G/K  from 
the  origin  to  the  principal  focus  for  either  way.  Then  using  the  approximation 
already  supposed  found,  calculate  the  values  of  AG,  AK  which  it  shows.  Vary  the 
focal  length  of  the  first  lens  and  recalculate  them.  Vary  also  the  third  lens  and 
recalculate  them.  We  then  have  means  for  interpolating  the  correct  values  of  the 
first  and  third  lenses  requisite  to  give  an  achromatic  system  in  conjunction  with  the 
middle  lens. 

This  will  be  illustrated  by  the  calculation  of  the  actual  system  which  I  set  out  to 
tii  id  and  to  which  I  now  come.  It  will  be  understood  that  it  was  obtained  by  steps 
of  approximation. 

It  is  unnecessary  to  give  details  regarding  all  these  steps,  which  were  unnecessarily 
circuitous,  owing  to  numerical  mistakes  and  ill-judged  processes.  I  shall  therefore 
give  the  final  stage  only. 

The  notation  is  slightly  varied  from  the  standard  notation  of  SEIDEL,  00  is  the 
vertex  of  the  great  mirror,  B0  its  curvature,  Oa  the  vertex  of  first  surface  of  the 
reverser,  O',  the  vertex  of  the  second  or  silvered  surface,  0".,,  which  is  the  same  point 
as  O»  is  the  last  surface  of  the  reverser  ;  Bs,  B'.,,  B"2  =  -B2,  are  the  corresponding 
curvatures  ;  04,  (y4  are  the  vertices  of  the  first  and  second  surfaces  of  the  first  lens 
of  tin-  corrector,  with  curvatures  B4,  B'4;  O«,  0'6  with  curvatures  B6)  B'6  refer  to 
the  second  lens  of  the  corrector.  For  the  thicknesses  of  the  lenses  I  employ  here 


CASSEGRAIN   REFLECTOi;    WITH   CORRECTED  FIELD.  4fl 

even  suffixes,  thus  ta  =  OSO'.,  =  <  >'J  >" ....  /,  =  <>,O'4,  /„  =  OgO',, ;  for  the  separations, 
d,  =  000,,  d,  =  0",04,  d6  =  O'A, 

H,,  H"a  are  the  unit  points  of  the  reverser  ;  H4,  H'4  and  Ha,  H',,,  those  of  the  two 
lenses  of  the  corrector.  Similarly  F,  is  the  principal  focus  for  the  great  mirror, 
F3,  F'3)  F"3  for  tin-  ditferent  surfaces  of  the  reverser,  and  so  on,  the  final  focus  of  the 
whole  combination  bein<j  F"7. 

Writing,  as  above, 

*  =  (l-i)(B-B'),         7  =  (l  +  i)(B  +  B'),         q  =  9/K, 
we  find  by  considering  the  scheme 

,     -in,  or    ,,       •  i    r«.  H- 

.(n-l)B,    nj    L*      U    Un^-lJF,    n-'J       [K,     L. 
that  for  any  thick  lens 

K  =  K-n(l-n-1 


and 

.    (24) 


For  the  reverser  we  have  the  scheme,  including  reversal  of  the  ray  at  the  reflection, 

i-i)B,,  »Jl*    ij  l.2B'z,  ij  1*    ij    -(W-'-OB,,  w-'J     [K,,  L, 

whence 

K2  =  2n 


=  -O",H"a  .............    (25) 

Write  (Ka)  for  the  part  of  K2  which  is  due  to  the  lens  of  the  reverser,  namely, 
(K,)  =  (l-«-1 


By  methods  essentially  the  same  as  those  exposed  below  I  was  led  to  the  following 
approximate  values  as  a  system  corrected  for  aberrations  :— 

B0  =-•   '250000,     eu=  +'16502,     a0=  +'200000, 

d,  =  +1  '320  133, 

Ba  =  -B"2  =  +'469009,     B'a  =  +'450653,     tt  =  +'020000, 

d3  =  +'906760, 

B4=  -'697845,     B'4=  +2'043309,     tt  =  +'012500, 

c?5  =  +'002500, 

Bj  =  +'003705,     B'6  =  -2'610677,     tt  =  +'012500. 
VOL.  ccxiir.  —  A.  H 


5{)  |i|!.    R.   A.   SAMPSON   ON   A 

The  initial  **lUp«tlM,  *,  does  not  enter  the  calculations,  Imt  is  carried  through 
at  ite  wl..pt«l  vain.-,  which  is  recorded  here  for  reference. 
It  follows  that 

K,  =  +'875000,        (K,)  =  - '010297, 
0,H,  = -0",H",  =  + '013200, 

K4=  +1-428571,     04H4=  +-006116,     O'4H'4=  -'002089, 

K«= -1'359456,     0^,,=  +  -008211,     0',^.=  -'000012, 

and  that 

0,,H2=  +1-333333,         H"2F",  =  +1'600000, (26) 

and  the  power  of  the  combination  of  great  mirror  and  reverser  is  the  same  as  in  the 
preliminary  solution.     The  achromatism  of  the  system  proved  also  satisfactory,  but 
the  numbers  had  to  be  recast  because  of  the  following  defect.     As  will  be  seen  on 
p.  63,  the  semi-aperture  of  the  lenses  of  the  corrector  is  about  a  =  +'0615.     Hence 
the  separations  of  the  vertices  of  the  surfaces  which  are  next  to  one  another  must  be 
at   least  ^*(B'4— Bg)  =  +'00387.     Hence  enough  separation  has  not  been  allowed, 
since  we  have  taken  d&  =  +  "00250.    I  therefore  increased  db  to  the  value  of  +  '005000. 
At  the  same  time  I  decided  to  increase  the  thickness  t6  also  to  £6  =  +'015000.     To 
change  rf&,  /„  means  upsetting  the  balance  of  achromatism  between  the  lens  of  the 
revereer  and  the  lenses  of  the  corrector.     All  the  quantities  then  will  require  adjust- 
ment.    The  first  step  is  to  re-establish  the  achromatism.     In  doing  so  I  keep  the 
first  lens  of  the  corrector  unchanged,  and  two  trials  at  least  will  be  requisite  to  get 
material  for  a  proper  adjustment  of  the  other  two  as  explained  on  p.  48.     I  found 
by  inspection  and  by  previous  trials  that  an  alteration  of  the  second  lens  of  the 
corrector  produces  its  effect  almost  solely  upon  the  coefficient  K  of  the  final  scheme, 
ami  hardly  at  all  upon  G  ;  hence- 1  first  adjust  the  lens  of  the1  reverser  so  as  to  make 
A<  I  =  0  for  variation  of  refractive  index,  and  then  the  second  lens  of  the  corrector  so 
as  to  make  AK  =  0   also.    .Since  the  system  0"2...06  from    the  last  face  of  the 
ivvereer  to  the  first  face  of  the  second  lens  is  unaltered  throughout  I  take  it  in  one 

o 

pier.-,  taking  the  lens  (4)  with  the  data  of  p.  49,  and 

da  = +'906760,         d&=  +  '005000, 
and  taking  in  succession 

fi  =  n-'  =  1  "520000,         n  =  "657895 
and 

'  =  1"()1  xrr1  =  1"535200.         n  +  Sn  =  '651381, 


CASSEGRATN  REFLECTOR  WITH  CORRECTED  FIELD.  51 

sve  have  then  for  the  piece  O",...O6, 

1,     +'906760'!    f         1,  ]    fl,     +'012500'!    f  1,  * 

1        J    [+'238736,     + '657895  J[*  1        J[ +1 '062521,     +1'520000 

1,      +'005000]  f  + 1'010127,      +   -929210] 

«<  I  k  [»], 

1        J  [+1-428571,      +2-304108  J 

and 

"1,      +-9067601    f.        1,  *        I    f1'     +'012500l    f  L  *        1 

1  _ +'243282,     +'651381 J  1  ^  +  T093579,      +1'535200J 


"1,      + '005000  "I  f  +  1'010393,      +    '929370] 

*<  >          [n  +  Sn]. 

1        J  [+T470392,      +2-3421 97  J 

Now,    taking    the   reverser   first   as   given    on    p.    49,    we    have   for   the   system 
<>„... O",, 

1,  *1    fl,      +1'320133"1    f  1,  *        1    f1'      •f'020000l 

-'500000,     lj    [*  1        J    [-'160450,       h  '657895  J    [*  1        J 

1,  *]    fl,      +'020000]    f  1,  *        ] 


• 


+  '901306,      lj    1*  1        J    [-'243885,      +1'520000/ 


+  '330582,      +1 '36 1934"! 

-'208333,      +2'16667   J 
and 

1,  *1    fl,      +1-320133"!    f  1,  *        1    fl>      +'020000 

•500000,     lj    [*  1  1_--163505,      +'651381 J    [*  1 


1,  *|    fl,    .+-020000"! 

+  '901306,      lj    [*  1  [-'251014,      +1*535200 


1,  I     i,       •   T    VXlUVW     I  i, 

X 


+  '330672,      +T  36 1508] 

>        [n  +  Sn], 
-'208522,      +2'165574j 


H  2 


DR.  R.  A.   SAMPSON  ON    A 

alao  the  second  lens  of  the  corrector  0....(V.  with  curvatures,  M  given  on  p.  49,  but 
increasing  the  thickness  to  '015000,  is 

r       i,  1  ft,    +-oi5oool  J        i, 

[-'001267,     +  -657895J  [*  1       J    [-r357552,      +  T520000. 

+    '999981      + '009868  | 
-T359452     +'986604j 

!IM<1  !,  *       1  Jl,     + '0150001    f  1,  *         1 

-'001292,     +'651381 J  I*  1       J    L-1'397234,     l'535200j 

+   '999981,     + -009771] 

|>       [n+Sn], 
-1-399190,      +  '986348  J 

Hence  the  whole  combination  gives 

•330582,     +1-3619341    r  +  1'010127,      +    '9292101    f+    '999981,     +'0098681 
-'208333,     +2-166667  J  1+1-428571,      +2'304108  J    [-1-359452,     + '986604  J 

+  '140265,     +3'457413l 

-'198450,     +2'237713  J 
and 

'330672,     +1-3615081    f  +  1'010393,     +   '9293701    f+    '999981,     +'009771 1 
-'208522,     +2165574 J[  + 1-470892,     +2'342197 J    [  +  1'399190,     +'98634sj 

+  '140291,     +3'45733G] 

[n+Sn]. 
-'198480,     +2'236730J 

Hence  for  n  +  Sn  there  is  an  excess  in  the  coefficient  G  of  26  units ;  to  correct  this, 
guided  by  previous  experiments,  I  made  a  trial  change  in  (K2),  which  refers  to  the 
lens  of  the  reverser,  of  —1220  units,  so  that 

(Ka)  =  -'010297-'001220  =  -'011517. 
This  gives,  to  redetermine  the  reverser,  supposing  its  power  is  to  remain  unchanged, 

-lW,(l  +  tJca)*  =  +  '875000, 
fcs  =  (n-l)B2,         *,=  +'020000, 

B,=  +'472584,         B',= +'451898, 


CASSEORAIN   REFLECTOR  WITH  CORRECTED  FIELD.  53 

and   these   give   for  the   system   0,,...O"a   the   schemes,    liuilt   up  just   as   on   the 
previous  page, 

{  +  '330582,      +1-3619341  f +  '380671,     +  T361508] 

>     and     [n  +  Snl     •{  }• 

-'208333,      +  2-166667  J  [-'208547,     +2'165477j 

of  which  the  first  is  the  same  as  we  had  before,  supplying  a  verification  of  the 
solution  of  the  equations  for  B,,  B',. 

Substitute  these  in  the  schemes  Ou...O',,  in  place  of  the  values  already  used; 
[n]  is,  of  course,  unchanged,  and  we  find  for 

f  + '140266,      +3-457242"! 
[n+*»],  I- 

[-•198505,      +2'236634  J 

Hence  G  has  now  the  same  value  in  lx>th  schemes  and  it  is  unnecessary  to  make  a 
further  trial  or  change  of  the  reverser,  but  there  remains  an  excess  in  K  of  —55 
units ;  to  deal  with  this,  try  reducing  the  curvature  of  each  face  of  the  second  lens  of 
the  corrector  by  one-hundredth  part.  This  will  give  the  schemes 

1,  "1    fl,      +-015000"!    f  1, 

-'001254,      + '657895 J\*  1        J  \-r343976,      +  T520000_ 

+    '999981,      + '009868] 

-1-345856,      + '986738  J 
and 

1,  1    fl,      + -015000]    f  1, 

-'001279,      + '651381 J  \* 

+    -999981,      + -009771"] 

[n  +  Sn]. 
-T385200,      + '986484  J 

Substituting  these  in  the  combination  O,,...O'S  we  get 

f  + -140265,      +3-457414")  f  + '140266,      +3'457242] 

[»J,     -j  >      and     [n  +  Sn],      4 

-'196543,      +2-284718J  [-'196543,      +2'284996j 

(27) 

Hence  both  G  and  K  are  now  identical,  and,  in  consequence,  both  schemes  indicate 
the  same  principal  focus  and  the  same  focal  length  ;  in  other  words,  complete 
achromatism  at  the  principal  focus. 


5000"!    f  1,  *         1 

1        J    [-1-383262,      + 1-535200 J 


l>l;.    |;.    \.   SAMPSON  ON    A 

\\  .  LOW  return  t..  tin-  .-ilHMT.-iti.mH  ;  we  have  replaced  the  numbers  of  p.  49  by  the 
following:  — 

B,  =  -     -250000, 

,/,  =  +1-320133, 

B,  =  -B",  =  +'472584,     B'3  =  +'4  5  1898,     t,  =>  +'020000, 

,lt  =  +'906760, 

B«  =  -'697845,     B'4  =  +2'043309,     tt  =  +'012500, 

(i,  =  +'005000, 

B,=  +'003667,     B',=  -2'584570,     ^=+'015000,     ...'..     (28) 

;unl  in  these  changes  the  aberrations  calculated  for  the  lenses  of  p.  49  will  be  changed  ; 
\\  «•  now  require  to  find  new  values  for  qt,  qt,  which  will  restore  the  disturbed  correction. 
It  may  be  remarked  that  the  chromatic  correction  depends  very  little  upon  the 
distribution  <>f  the  curvatures  between  the  two  faces  which  is  indicated  in  the  value  of 
q,  and  it  might  have  been  reflected  that  as  the  surface  (6)  is  nearly  plane,  and  the 
U-.-im  meets  it  nearly  at  right  angles,  while  the  surface  (6')  produces  almost  the  whole 
deviation  of  the  beam  for  which  the  second  lens  is  answerable,  it  would  have  been 
better  to  keep  B'6  unmodified  while  the  second  lens  was  adjusted  for  achromatism,  but 
this  was  not  noticed  until  the  solution  which  follows  had  been  made,  and  was  found  to 
reproduce  almost  exactly  the  value  of  B'8  of  p.  49. 

The  aberration  coefficients  for  a  thin  lens  at  its  surface  are  given  by  (6),  p.  33.  I 
have  not  so  far  succeeded  in  supplementing  these  by  any  algebraic  expression  containing 
ivt'crence  to  thicknesses  or  separations  of  lenses,  which  are  simple  enough  to  be  useful. 
IliMice  the  procedure  for  finding  qt,  qe,  e0  must  be  by  approximation,  and  the  following 
is  the  method  adopted.  Calculate  at  the  principal  focus  of  the  complete  combination 
tjivt'n  by  (28)  the  numerical  values  of  the  aberration  coefficients,  or  at  least  the 
essential  ones  <5,G,  SaG,  <5gG,  in  three  parts,  namely,  first,  the  great  mirror  and  reverser 
together  in  which  e,,  is  easily  included  as  an  unknown  ;  second,  the  first  lens  of  the 
corrector  ;  and  third,  the  second  lens  of  the  corrector.  The  conditions  for  a  corrected 
system  are  then 


these  are  not  satisfied  we  must  bring  in  corrected  values  of  g4,  q»,  e0  to  satisfy 
I  asKiim.-  lor  the  purpose  of  approximate  correction  that  the  quantities  q,  q'J 
.Iculated  aberrations  with  the  same  coefficients  as  if  the  lenses  were  thin  ; 
this  Hup,M«iti..i.  I  calculate  the  algebraic  values  of  the  aberrations,  carrying  them 
the  surfaces  of  the  lenses  forwards  to  F'7  and  backwards  to  O0  by  a  double 
tl..-   formula.  (17)  of  p.   160  of  the   Memoir.     Assuming  that  these 
W*  ••,«  tl,..  adjustable  parameters  ,„,  qtt  qt  account  for  the  discrepancies 
10118  to  determine  e0,  qt,  qt>  and  in  consequence  amended  values  of  the 


CASSEGRAIX    KKFLKCTOlt   WITH   CORRECTED  FIELD.  55 

curvatures  of  (28),  that  is  to  say,  the  material  to  repeat  the  approximation,  if 
required,  and  finally  to  pro\.-  that  no  further  change  is  necessary. 

The  numerical  calculation  of  all  aberration!  follows  the  model  given  in  the  Memoir, 
pp.  172  ct  ?«•</.  ,  and  it  will  l>e  unnecessary  as  a  rule  to  give  details  of  the  working 
here,  though  I  may  mention  thai  I  have  found  a  noteworthy  abbreviation  of  it. 

The  great  mirror  and  reverser  together,  the  former  treated  as  parabolic,  contribute 

atF, 

J,G  =  ...  +  '057176,     SyG  =  +'  354860,     SjGr  =  -3'297523. 


\Vc  must  also  introduce  the  deviation  of  the  mirror  from  a  paraboloid,  viz.,  we 
have  at  the  surface  of  the  mirror  the  additional  term  Stk  =  ...+2e0B08  =  —  '0312500e(l, 
and  all  the  others  unaffected.  To  find  the  effect  of  this  in  the  final  set  StG.  ...  ,  by 
(17)  of  the  Memoir  we  must  take  h'itk  in  <J,G  merely,  where  h'  belongs  to  the  scheme 
<>....F'7  and  is  simply  equal  to  the  final  focal  length,  which  comes  out  +5*087942; 
hence  we  must  supplement  the  numerical  values  above  by  the  unknown  term 

J,G  =  ...  -'i58998e0,    £,G  =  *,   <J3G  =  *. 

Next  we  find  that  the  other  two  lenses  contribute  together  at  F; 

J,G  =  ...  -'0301G7,     33G  =  ...-  '342260,     ^G  =  ...  +  2'494419. 
Further,  for  the  three  sections 

$  =  -  '417950+  '937763-'885449  =  -'365636, 
H  =  +5*087942,  ^H  =  -'930167, 


and  the  three  equations  to  satisfy  being 

<5,G  =  0,         «*2G  =  0,         <J,G  =  -'930167, 
we  find  the  actual  numbers  leave  residuals  in  the  left-hand  memliera  of  the  values 

+  '027009,          +'012600,          +'127057  .......     (29) 

These  are  to  be  brought  to  zero  when  supplemented  by  the  proper  expressions  in 
*•»  ?4»  <?«»  and  «o  is  dealt  with  above. 

Now  referring  to  the  expressions  for  a  thin  lens  and  writing  q  =  qjk  so  that  for  the 
system  just  computed  q4  =  +2'3734,  qfl  =  +4'8325,  and  confining  attention  to  the 
forms  in  which  q  is  introduced  at  the  surfaces  of  the  lenses,  these  are  respectively  :  — 

First  lens  — 

Sl7<=  ...  -'671321q4, 

<V4  =  •••  +'959031il,+  >JC.5793q/,         S^  =  ...  +'671321q«, 
<J,A4  =  ...  +'67i:i21q4, 
and  the  rest  zero  ; 


5fi  DR.  R.   A.  SAMPSON  ON   A 


Sin=...  --59583H, 

.-  -  '8019054,-  -222246q,',         -V*  =  •••  +  '595833qB, 
...  +  '595833^ 

and  the  rest  zero. 
For  the  second  lens,  the  subsequent  normal  scheme  OV-.F7  is 

{gf,hf;  VI'}  =  {I,  +713667;          *      ,1} 

and  by  (17)  of  the  Memoir,  tbis  gives  for  the  second  lens  from  Oa...F'7  the  terms 
in  q:— 


Coefficient,  q(-,. 
-1-168126 

Coefficient,  q02. 
-'158610 

+   '425226 

* 

* 

+    '425226 

* 

* 

# 

* 

# 

The  preceding  normal  scheme  O0...Ort  is 

{g,h;  k,l}  =  {  +  '140346,  +  3'389017  ;  -'007760,  +6'937860}. 

We  see,  by  referring  to  the  equations  (17)  of  the  Memoir  already  quoted  so 
frequently,  that  in  order  to  get  <S,G,  S2G,  S3G,  we  must  form  gS,y6  +  kS,^e(s  -  1,2,3) 
with  these  values  of  g,  h,  k,  I,  and  multiplying  them  respectively  by 

g1  =  +     '019697,  2gk  =  -      '002178,  k2  =  +      '000060, 

gh  =  +     '475635,  gl+hk  =  +     '947402,  kl  =  -     '053838, 

=  +1T485436,  2M  =  +47'025051,  P  =  +48'133901, 

take  the  sums.     The  values  of  gS,y^  +  kS^  are 

Coefficient,  q0.  Coefficient,  qa2. 

*  =  1    •                              -'167242  -'022260 

2  .....          +'059679  * 

3  .....                  *  * 

the  resulting  values  are 

Coefficient,  q6.  Coefficient,  qa2. 

<!iG=-  -'003424  -'000438,5 

-'023006  -'010587,6 
+  '885540  -'255667,4.     .     .     .     (31) 


CASSKGHAIN   KKH.I-.rHMl   WITH   CORRECTED   FIELD.  57 

In  the  same  way,  for  tin-  fir-t  l.-ns  ..('  the  corrector,  the  subsequent  normal  scheme 
()',.. .O,   is    V,  h'\    /•'./'    ={+'(>:  ,  7U-J68;     -  1  '345856,    +'980009},  which 

•  rivi-s  for  the  first  system.  !>••(  \\.-.-n  O4...F7 

Coeffificnt,  q,.  Coefficient,  q4*. 

s +-65H4!)<;  + -1898 1 7 

= + -479503 

*  * 


+  •479503 

*  * 

*  * 


The  preceding  normal  aclicnu-  <  > <  >,  is 

(gj,  ;  /-,/}  =  {  +  '141675,  +3-326581  :    -'208333,  +2'1GGGG7}, 

wliich  gives 

g*  =  +      '020072,  2gk  =  -       '059031,  F  =  +    '043403, 

gh  =  +      '471294,  gl  +  hk  =  -       '386074,  kl  =         '451388, 

A' =  +11-066161,  2/i/=  +14-415196,  I3  =  +4'694446, 

so  that  with  the  values  of  gr«Vy4  +  W.«»i,  which  are 

Coefficient,  q4.  Coefficient,  q4». 

s=l - -006604  +'026897 

2 +'067934 

8  .....  *  * 

we  find  the  contributions  of  the  first  lens  ()„... F'7 

Coefficient,  q4.  Coefficient,  q4a. 

«$,G  =     .     .     .     .  -'004143  +  '000539,9 

^G  =     .     .     .     .         -'029340  +'012676,2 

S3G=     ....          +'906201  +'297642,1.     .  (32) 

With  the  values  q4  =  +2'3734,  q«  =  +4'8325,  the  joint  contribution  of  the  two 
lenses  in  respect  to  the  terms  q,  qa  would  be,  from  these  expressions, 

J,G=  ...-'033578,         JaG=  ...-'356618,         ^G  =  ...  +2'136186. 

Hence  if  new  values  of  «,,  q4,  q,  are  to  satisfy  the  conditions  exactly,  these  are 
determined  by  the  equations 

Coefficient, ««.  Coefficient,  q4.    Coefficient,  q4».   Coefficient,  q«.   Coefficient,  q«*.  Constant. 

0  =  -'158998      -'004143      +'000539,9      -'003424       -'000438,5  +    '060587 

0=            *           -'029340     +'012676,2      -'023006      -'010587,6  +'369218 

0=            *           +'906201      +'297642,1      +'885540      -'255667,4  -2'009113  .  (33) 

VOL.  COXIII. — A.  I 


58 


PR   R.   A.   SAMPSON   ON   A 


the  solutions  of  which  are 

4,  =  +2-390547,         q,(  =  +  4'936038, 


eu  =  +'164675. 


.     (33A) 


1C  with  these  values  of  q4,  q*  we  calculate  the  curvatures  of  the  two  lenses  from  the 
t'«>rmul>u  (24)  of  p.  49,  we  find  that  the  completed  approximation  directs  us  to  replace 
the  numbers  of  p.  54  from  which  we  set  out  by 

B4  =  -'693009,         B'4  =  +  2'048193, 

B«,  =  -'024163,         B'«  =  -2-612025, (34) 

together  with  the  value  of  e0  just  written  down. 

Turning  back  to  p.  49,  where  these  data  from  a  previous  approximation  are  set 
down,  we  see  that  the  chief  effect  of  the  step  is  to  restore  B'g  to  the  value  given  on 
p.  49,  throwing  the  change  in  focal  length  which  is  demanded  for  achromatism,  in 
accordance  with  p.  53,  almost  exclusively  upon  B6,  which  is  a  surface  that  contributes 
very  little  to  these  aljerrations.  The  changes  are  thus  in  reality  smaller  than  they 
appear.  Following  now  strictly  the  plan  given  on  p.  54,  the  next  step  is  to  take 
the  new  system  as  a  whole  and  calculate  exactly  its  numerical  aberrations  at  its 
principal  focus;  it  is  unnecessary  to  give  the  details  of  this  step,  which  contains 
nothing  new  ;  the  following  numbers  show  first  the  normal  schemes  from  the  surface 
Oa  up  to  each  other  point,  and  then  the  contribution  of  each  surface  to  each  of  the 
coefficients  <5,G..  .<S3H  at  the  principal  focus  F'7. 


Surface  O0 

Oa  to  O2 
Otf  to  Oa  and  surface  O2 

00  to  O'a 
O9  to  O',  and  surface  0'2 

00  to  O", 
0B  to  O",  and  surface  0", 

O0  to  O4 
O,  to  O4  and  surface  O4 

O,  to  0'4 
O,  to  O'4  and  surface  O'4 

O0toO8 
O0  to  ()„  and  surface  O, 

00  to  O', 
O.  to  O7.  and  surface  0'. 

00  to  F- 


M  =  1 

['5200. 

Normal  Schemes,  {g,  h  ;  k,  I}. 

{  + 

1  '000000, 

* 
j 

-'500000, 

+  1'000000}, 

{  + 

'339933, 

+  T320133  ; 

-'500000, 

+  roooooo}, 

{  + 

'339933, 

+  1'320133  ; 

-'383906, 

+  -444465}, 

{  + 

'332255, 

+  T329022; 

-'383906, 

.+  '444465}, 

{  + 

'332255, 

+  T329022; 

-'083615, 

+  1-645630}, 

{  + 

'330583, 

+  T361935; 

-'083615, 

+  1-645630}, 

{  + 

'330583, 

+  1-361935; 

-•208333, 

+  2-166667}, 

{  + 

'141675, 

+  3-326584; 

-'208333, 

+  2'166667}, 

{  + 

'141675, 

+  3'326584  ; 

-'103472, 

+  2'214112}, 

{  + 

'140382, 

+  3'354260; 

-'103472, 

+  2'214112}, 

{  + 

'140382, 

+  3-354260; 

-'007762, 

+  6-937938}, 

{  + 

'140343, 

+  3-388950; 

-'007762, 

+  6'937938}, 

{  + 

•140343, 

+  3'388950; 

-'003947, 

+  4'592448}, 

{  + 

•140284, 

+  3-457837; 

-'003947, 

+  4-592448}, 

{  + 

•140284, 

+  3*457837  ; 

-'196540, 

+  2'283904}, 

{ 

* 

> 

+  5-088015; 

-'196540, 

+  2-283904}. 

(35^ 

CASSEGHAIN   REFLECTOR  WITH   CORRECTED  FIELD. 

M  =  T5200. 
Aberration  Coefficients  at  F'7. 


50 


Surface. 

Lateral. 

Obliquity. 

Lateral. 

Obliquity. 

Lateral. 

Obliquity. 

0 

+  '29182 

-'31800 

* 

+  '63600 

* 

* 

2 

-'01094 

+'06023 

-'04251 

-'19332 

•16509 

+      '47099 

2' 

-•((4216 

+'08433 

-'  16866 

-'01984 

'67464 

T50801 

2" 

-'01195 

-'02233 

-'04922 

+  '19242 

•20279 

1'21803 

4 

+  '00227 

+  '00722 

+  '05341 

-'04912 

+    I'  254  14 

'04592 

4' 

+  '00550 

-'00212 

+  '13140 

+  '03502 

+    3*13954 

+    8-63910 

6 

'00000 

'00000 

'00000 

-'00029 

+      '00006 

+      '21537 

6' 

-'02836 

-'01552 

-'69898 

+  '17309 

-17*22893 

+   6-37874 

+  -201;  is 

-'20619 

-77456 

+  77396 

-13-87771 

+  12-93224 

v 

j 

v 

, 

V 

j 

40- 

-'00001 

S,G  = 

-'00060 

OgvJI    ^— 

-'94547 

Surface. 

Lateral. 

Obliquity. 

Lateral. 

Obliquity. 

Lateral. 

Obliquity. 

0 

-  T.3600 

+  1  '27200 

* 

-2'54401 

* 

* 

2 

+  '05238 

•28821 

+    '20342 

+    '92507 

+        '79000 

2-25380 

2' 

+  '18850 

•37701 

+    75400 

+    '08871 

+      3-01601 

+     674169 

2" 

+  '04992 

+   '09328 

+    '20564 

-   '80386 

+        '84719 

+      S'08862 

4 

+  '00103 

+    '00327 

+    '02417 

-    '02222 

+        '56746 

'02078 

4' 

+  '27  142 

•10500 

+  6-48513 

+  172840 

+  154*95440 

+  426'39006 

6 

-  '00006 

-   '00021 

•00153 

+    '17490 

•03694 

-132-40118 

6' 

-'33991 

•   '18598 

-S'37835 

+  2'07474 

-206'51664 

+   76-45958 

-'41272 

+    '41214 

70752 

+  T62173 

•   46'37852 

+  380-00419 

V 

, 

v 

/ 

V 

=  -'00058 


SM  =  +'91421 


SaR  =  +333-62567 


.     (36) 

From  these  results  we  read  the  particulars  of  the  field  from  the  data  given  on 
p.  30.     We  have,  by  pp.  58,  49, 

/'  =  +5'088015,         a  =+'200000. 

Hence,  from  <S,G,  we  find  for  the  remaining  spherical  aberration  a  circle  of  radius 
0""0004  at  distance  '000001  before  the  axial  focus. 

I  2 


,„._    ,;.    A.    BAUFBOfl 

O  v 

,,.,  t:iui,s  that  d^nd  "M  "Equity,  I  shall  take  as  standard 

0  =  -01  =  tan'1  34'  22"'6, 

,,,„  sl,,l!  ,1s,,  ,iv,-  the  -suits  for  0  =  tan  30',  and  =  tan  «(»'.     We  have  then  for  the 
radius  of  the  <;»nat!c  circle 

fl-  tan  30'.  0  =  tan  34'  -4.  £  =  tan  60'. 

_0"-0042  -0"X)048  -O'"0083. 

I-',,,-  tli,-  /•./</;»*  of  the  focal  cir»-l'- 

0-taiiSO1.  0  =  tan  34'  -4.  0  =  tan  60'. 

+  0'"282  +  0"'370  +  1"'127. 

P«  the  m<//»*  '!/'/"•  wnwtore  ,,f  the  field,  -1G2'817  ;  and  hence  for  the  displace- 
ment ,,f  the  f.K-al  circl.  IV.  .11  1  the  plane  through  the  axial  principal  focus 

/3  =  tan30'.  0  =  tan  34'  -4.  £  =  tan  60'. 

-  -000006  -'000008  -'000024. 

Finally.  i«>r  the  distortional  displacement 

ft  =  tan  30'.  ft  =  tan  34'-4.  ft  =  tan  60'. 

+  4"'48  4-6"75  +35'"89. 

It  will  he  recalled  that  the  linear  unit  is  supposed  to  be  100  inches.* 

We  conclude  that  spherical  aberration,  coma,  and  curvature  of  the  field  are  now 

completely  insensible,  and  that  stars  would  be  represented  by  strictly  circular  images 

of  diameter  0'56  seconds  at  a  distance  of  30  minutes  from  the  centre  of  the  field,  and 

2'25  S.M-..  in  Is  at  1  degree  distance.    No  images  at  present  obtained  with  any  telescope, 

at  the  middle  of  the  field,  where  all  obliquity-faults  are  absent,  are  sensibly  less  than 

1  Beoond  in  diameter.    Hence  this  also  is  completely  satisfactory  up  to  a  diameter  of  field 

of  l£  degrees,  or  even  more.     There  remains  distortion,  which  requires  examination. 

This  can  !*•  calculated  precisely  and  applied  as  a  correction  to  measures  made,  along  with 

difl'i'tvntial  ivt'raotion  and  other  unavoidable  corrections.     Hence,  even  if  its  amount 

is  very  considerable  it  can  be  dealt  with  in  a  way  that  will  not  vitiate  the  use  of  the 

telescope.     It  is  possible,  indeed,  that  a  correction  for  distortion  requires  to  be  applied 

toother  1'-l«-M-"|x-s  now  in  use,  especially  those  in  which  the  lenses  of  the  object-glass 

are  aepurati-d.     It  is  instructive  to  look  into  the  contributions  of  the  different  surfaces 

t<»  tin-  t,.tal  <•(',  Ml.     Tin-  most  remarkable  is  —  132'4  units  from  the  surface  (6)  which 

is  nearly  a  plain-  surface.     This  is  an  obliquity-constituent,  and  would  be  present  if 

tin-  surface  were  a  perfect  plane.     We  see  by  examining  the  normal  scheme  next 

preceding  the  surface  (6)  that  the  original  obliquity,  /3,  of  the  ray  is  increased  nearly 


•iililnl  Mmrh  .v,  IHI.i.  —  It  is  of  interest  to  add  that  these  conclusions  have  been  checked  by 
trigonometrical  calculations  also,  made  by  Mr.  A.  E.  CONRADY  at  the  instance  of  one  of  the  Referees.] 


CASSEGKA1N   KKFLECTOU  WITH   CORRECTED  FIKLD.  61 

seven  fold  •  before  impact  upon  this  surface.     It   is   this   that   produces   the   large 


It  might  be  possible,  with  these  numbers  before  one,  to  rearrange  the  general  plan 
of  the  surfaces  so  as  to  produce  a  smaller  value  of  <J3H,  but  as  explained  above,  it  is  not 
essential  to  do  so  in  a  telescope  which  is  not  likely  to  I*  used  for  exact  measures  over 
a  field  of  more  than  30  minutes  radius. 

We  now  return  to  the  question  of  achromatism.  We  shall  first  verify  that  as  fur 
as  the  normal  scheme  goes,  the  achromatism  which  was  secured  for  the  scheme  of 
p.  54,  has  not  been  sensibly  impaired  by  the  changes  since  made  in  the  distribution 
of  curvatures  between  the  surfaces.  Writing  down  only  the  surfaces,  we  have 


1*5352. 


Surface  <  >„ 
Surf:uvs  (  >,„  (  )., 

,,  ' '0'  *  *2>  '  '  'J 

„    o,,... <>"„ 

„        00...04 
,,        0....0", 

„     o0...o, 
„      IV..O'. 


Normal  Srhi-im-s  for 

{ +1-000000, 

{+   '339933,  +r320i:i:< 

{+    '332299,  +1*328811 

{+   '330671,  +1-361508 

{+   '141569,  +    '3325076 

{+   '140298,  +3-352749 

{+   '140287,  +3-388119 

{+    '140283,  +3'457665 

*      ,  +5-088015 


--500000,  +r  oooooo}, 

-•381G9G,  +    '433886}, 

-'08 1365,  +1-634860}, 

-'208547,  +2-165477}, 

-'101641,  +2'213876}, 

-'002245,  +7'074002}, 

-'000281,  +4-636412}, 

-'196540,  +2'284156}, 

-•196540,  +2-284156}. 

(37) 


liy  comparing  this  with  the  schemes  (35),  p.  58,  it  will  be  seen  that  the  rays  of 
different  refractive  index  separate  decidedly  in  the  course  of  their  passage  through 
the  instrument  before  they  are  brought  together  at  their  common  principal  focus. 
The  filial  agreement  was  to  be  expected  as  it  was  within  our  control,  as  far  as  the 
normal  schemes  were  concerned,  but  it  now  remains  to  be  considered  whether  there 
is  any  sensible  chromatic  difference  of  aberrations ;  this  is  found  by  recalculating  the 
aberration  coefficients  with  refractive  index  1*5352  in  place  of  1*5200.  The  results 
are  as  follows : — 

n  +  Sn. 


<J,G  =  -'00018,     (J.G  =  +''00846,     J,G  =  -         '45888. 
.5,H  =  +'00844,     4H  =  +  1-39705,     <?3H  =  +351*826.  . 


(38) 


DR.  R.   A.  SAMPSON  ON  A 

Iiit.-rpivtiiig  these,  as  on  p.  59,  we  conclude  that  for 

fi  =  1-5352. 

of  Least  Circle  of  Alwrration,  -0"'007. 

Comatic  radius   . 
Focal  radiiiH 
Distortion 
DisplaceiiK-n 

Radius  of  curvature  of  field,  —  5"423. 

Tlie  effect  of  the  distortion  at  j8  =  '01  will  be  to  draw  out  the  image  into  a  small 
spectrum  of  length  7"' 13— G""75  =  0""38.  The  radius  of  curvature  of  the  field  is 
decidedly  changed ;  but  the  effect  of  the  change  as  shown  in  the  corresponding 
displacement  of  the  image-circle  is  not  considerable. 


ft  =  tan  30'. 

ft  =  tan  34'  -4. 

P  =  tan  60'. 

IS     

+  0"'0599 

+  0"'OG86 

+   0"-1197 

+  0"'431 

+  0"'5GG 

+    1"724 

+  4"74 

+  7"'  13 

+  37"'91 

of  focal  circle  . 

-      '000159 

-      '000240 

'000638 

AXIS  •»  6 

Fig.  2.    Whole  instrument.    Scale  1  :  30. 

It  will  be  remarked  that  all  these  numbers  run  in  the  sense  of  ^increasing  the 
uU-rrations ;  as  there  is  no  minimum  property  about  the  original  index  1'52,  we 
conclude  that  the  aberrations  for  smaller  indices  would  be  proportionately  diminished, 
and  we  see  that  it  would  have  been  better  to  have  secured  exact  agreement  for  the 
larger  index  in  place  of  the  smaller  one.  In  estimating  the  effect  we  may,  for 
instance,  take  the  following  values,  which  are  the  indices  for  CHANCE'S  hard  crown 
glass:— 

0,  D,  F,  G, 


Indt-x 


T5150,         T5175,         1-5235,         T5284 ; 


that  »  to  say  with  such  a  glass  two-thirds  of  the  excesses  shown  in  the  table  above, 
"•Hulls  of  p.  60,  would  cover  all  chromatic  differences.     There  appears  to 
H»lBg  „,  any  ,,f  them  that  calls  for  a  revision  of  the  calculations 

<»",  to  the  question  of  the  actual  sizes  and  places  of  the  mirrors  and 


CASSKCK.MN    KI.IU-rTOK    WITH    O  >i;|;K(TU  •    FII.I.H.  C,:; 


lenses  in  respect  to  the  paasji^'-  of  ;i  ray  through  the  instrument.  Calculate  from 
the  normal  schemes,  p.  58,  for  b=  +'20,  and  ft  =  —'01,0,  +'01  respectively,  the 
value  of  //  at  each  surface  ami  also  at  the  focal  plane  F'7  ;  this  will  give  the 
necessary  ajH-rtnn-s  for  complete  inclusion  of  all  rays  I'mm  the  great  mirror,  up 
to  these,  limits  of  ohli(|iiity.  We  find  ax  follows:— 

Value  of  Semi-aperture. 


Surface. 

/8  -   -  -01. 

0-  -00. 

P  =  +-01. 

0 

+  '200 

+  '200 

+  '200, 

2 

+  '055 

+  '068 

+  '081, 

2' 

+  '054 

+  '067 

+  '080, 

2" 

+  '053 

+  '066 

+  '079, 

4 

-'005 

+  '028 

+  '061, 

4' 

-'006 

+  '028 

+  '062, 

6 

-'006 

+  '028 

+  '062, 

6' 

-'007 

+  '028 

+  '063, 

7' 

-'051 

0 

+  '051. 

Hence  if  the  great  mirror  is  40  inches  in  diameter,  the  reverser  requires  to  be 
16'2  inches,  the  first  face  of  the  corrector  12'2  inches,  and  the  last  face  12'6  inches; 
the  diameter  of  the  image  at  the  focal  plane  would  be  10 '2  inches. 

It  is  necessary  to  verify  that  the  corrector  does  not  cut  out  any  rays  coming  from 
the  great  mirror  to  the  reverser.  By  the  data  on  p.  54,  the  first  face  of  the 
corrector  is  at  a  distance  +'413750  beyond  the  surface  of  the  great  mirror. 
Calculating  the  value  of  i/  along  the  ray  y1  =  fiz'  +  b',  for  this  value  of  x',  where 
b',  ft  are  taken  from  the  normal  scheme  for  the  ray  Ixstween  the  surfaces  O0  and  O, 

we  have 

Value  of  b.  ft  =  -  -01.  P  =  '00.  /8  =  +  -01. 

+  '200  +'154  +'159  +'163, 

+  '081  +'061  +'064  +'068.       .     .     .     (40) 

Thus  the  ray  which  just  cleared  the  reverser  on  its  way  to  the  great  mirror 
would  clear  the  corrector  on  its  return. 

Allowing  that  '085  of  the  radius  of  the  great  mirror  is  unavailable  the  effective 
aperture-ratio  is  reduced  from  40/508'8  =  1  :  1272  to  36'28/508'8  =  1  :  14'05. 

The  following  table  shows  the  inclinations  of  the  ray  to  the  axis  of  the  telescope 
between  the  various  surfaces : — 


,;  i  M;.    I;    A.   SAMPSON   ON   A 

Inclination  of  Kxtreme  Kay  to  Axis. 
For  b  =+-200.  0---01.  0  =  -00.  /i=+-OI. 


I:  Inn-  siuC.r,.  ()„  -0'6  0'0  +0'6, 

i  <)„  and  Oa  -6'3  -57  -5'1, 

O,     „     O'2  -4'6  -4'4  -4'1, 

O',    „     O",  -T9  -TO  0'0, 

O",  „     O4  -3'6  -2-4  -n, 

o,     „     O'4  -2'5  -T2  -0% 

<>',    „     O,  -4-1  -01  +3'9, 

<>„     „     O'«  -27  0'0  +  2'6, 

<>'«    „      F'7  -3'6  -2-3  -0'9.        .     (41) 

The  inclinations  of  the  ray  to  the  normals  of  the  surface  (.,„)  are  given  by 
.  +  'l*B;h,.  /^'a.  +  hj.Bj,  which  may  be  calculated  at  once  from  the  normal  schemes; 
but  note  that  as  these  include  reversals  for  the  case  of  a  mirror  we  must  then  take 
in  place  of  the  latter  ftf.Jn—  b^E^  :  — 

Inclination  of  Extreme  Ray  to  Normal  to  Surface. 
For6=+-200.         ft  =  -  -01.  ft  =  -00.  /3  =  +  -01. 


r-3'4 
|_3'4 


-2'9  -   2'3 

-2'9  -  2'3 


0                       r-4'8                   -3'9  -  3'01 

1-8-2                   -2'6  -  1'9  J 

(V  f-3'3  -27  -  2-n 

1-3-3  -27  -  2-1  J 

O",  f-3'3  -2'8  -  2'31 

1  _5'0  -4"2  -  3'3  J 

O  f-3'4  -3-5  -  3-6-1 

-2'3  -  2'4J 

0'4                     /-3'1                    +2'1  +  7-3-1 

ll-Oj 


-47  +3'2  -Hll- 

-4'1  -O'l 

-27  -0-1 


Ort  -  -O'l  +   3-81 

+   2-5J 


O'.  l'-17  -4'2  -   6-81 

L-2'6  -6'4  -10-2J      .     .      (42) 

Thus  the  greatest  angle  of  incidence  is  ll'O  degrees  upon  the  second  surface  of  the 

the  corrector.     This  is  much  below  what  is  permitted  in  the  construction 

t  glass  of  a  refractor;  we  find,  for  example,  in  STEINHEIL  and  VOIT'S 

J  an  aperture  ratio  of  1  :  12,  the  angle  of  incidence  of  extreme  rays, 

Jly  parallel  to  the  axes,  upon  the  first  surface  if  the  flint-lens  exceeds  1 5  degrees 


CASSKUKAIN  BEFLEOTOR  WITH  OOBBEOTBD  FIKI.D. 


I  would  add  a  few  remarks  upon  the  problems  presented  by  the  construction  of 
such  a  telescojM',  or  at.  any  rate,  i>t'  its  optical  parts.  It  requires  the  production  of  a 
great  mirror  and  three  lenses  which  shall  be  in  due  relation  to  one  another.  None 
of  the  sizes  or  curves  go  outside  what  has  already  been  made ;  and  whenever  a 
refractor  is  made,  three  of  the  surfaces  must  be  turned  out  in  agreement  with  the 
fourth.  Hence  there  is  no  new  difficulty  in  making  and  the  problem  is  essentially  a 
question  of  testing.  The  testing  must  be  optical  and  not  mechanical,  for  the  former 
far  outruns  the  latter  in  delicacy — it  is  said  ten  times.  And  because  there  are  so 
ninny  surfaces  it  would  1»  essential  to  test  them  independently  of  one  another.  In 
the  lenses,  four  out  of  the  six  surfaces  are  concave  and  spherical  and  can  be  tested 


AXIS 


Fig.  3.     Koverser  and  corrector.     Scale  1  :  3. 

with  reflected  light.  The  great  mirror  is  neither  a  sphere  nor  a  paraboloid,  but  its 
radius  of  curvature  for  different  zones  can  be  laid  down,  and  each  zone  tested  for 
agreement  with  this,  just  as  in  making  a  paraboloid.  There  remain  then  two  convex 
surfaces,  and  the  question  of  figuring  the  lens-surfaces  to  allow  for  inequalities  of 
refractive  index  within  the  glass.  These  are  matters  for  the  skill  of  the  maker  and 
it  would  seem  a  not  unreasonably  difficult  task. 

I  add  a  plan  of  the  whole  instrument  and,  upon  a  larger  scale,  of  the  reverser  and 
corrector,  and  also  the  final  specification,  collected  from  pp.  GO,  G2,  but  making  the 
unit  1  inch.  For  comparison  the  field  of  a  Newtonian  of  the  same  aperture  and  focal 
length  is  added.  It  may  be  recalled  that  the  displacement  of  the  centre  of  the  comatic 
circle  is  twice  the  comatic  radius.  For  an  uncorrected  Cassegraiu  the  field  would  be 
very  much  the  same  as  for  a  Newtonian  of  the  same  aperture  but  of  focal  length  equal 
to  that  of  the  great  mirror,  except  in  respect  to  curvature  and  distortion,  see  p.  41. 

I  would  express  my  acknowledgments  to  Mr.  R.  W.  WKIGLEY  who  helped  me  to 
perform  many  of  the  calculations. 

VOL.  CCXIII. A.  K 


66        DR.  R  A.  SA MI-SUN:  A  CASSRUAIX  REFLECTOR  WITH  CORRECTED  FIELD. 

Final  Scheme. 
(Jivat  mirror- 
Aperture     ....                           -««  =  40' 

Radius  of  curvature R0  =  -400'000, 

e,,=  +'  16468. 

c?,  =  +132'013. 
Revereer — 

Aperture     ......  2«2  =      16<2» 

First  surface    .....  R,  =  +211 '603, 

Silvered  surface R'2  =  +221'289, 

Thickness    ...  <2=      2-000. 

d,=  +90-676. 
Corrector,  1st  lens- 
Aperture     2«4  =      12'2, 

First  surface R4  =  -144'298, 

Second  surface R'4  =  +48 "824, 

Thickness .         tt  =      1'250. 

d6  =  +0'500. 
Corrector,  2nd  lens- 
Aperture     2a6  =      12'6, 

First  surface R6  =  -4138'559, 

Second  surface R'6  =  -38'285, 

Thickness te  —      1'500. 

d7=  +71-377. 

Focal  length /'.  =  +508'802. 

Distance  of  principal  focus  beyond 

surface  of  great  mirror +33"290. 

Whole  length  of  instrument     ....         167'3. 

Specification  of  Field  at  /8  =  "01  =  tan  34'"4. 

H  =  T5200.  /x  =  1-5352.  [Newtonian.] 

"  //  // 

Radius  of  least  circle  of  aljerration     .     .  O'OOO  — 0"007  O'OO 

Radius  of  comatic  circle   .     .     .  -0'005  +0'069  +0'80 

Radius  of  focal  circle   ,  +0'370  +0'566  -0'41 

Distortional  displacement +6'75  +7"13  O'OO. 

Curvature  of  fi.-l.l  -1/16282         -l/542'3         -1/508'8. 


[     67 


III.    Tin-  'I'lirriiHil  I'ro/ierties  of  Carbonic  Acid  at  Loiu  Temperatures. 

ll,i  ( '.  Ki:  i :\v  i:\  .1 1  \  KIN,  M.A.,  M.Inxt. C.  A'.,  /'rufensor  of  Engineering  Science,  Oxford; 
and  D.  R.  PYK,  M.A.,  Fellow  of  New  College,  Otford. 

< 'niitmnnicnti'il  hi/  Sir  J.  ALFRED  KWINO,  K.C.B.,  F.R.S. 

Heceiveil  January  27,— Read  February  27,  1913. 

CONTENTS. 

Page 

PART  I. — Object,  scope,  and  theory  of  the  experiments   . 68 

PART  II. — Detailed  description  of  Series  I.,  II.,  and  III 82 

PART  III. — Detailed  description  of  Series  IV.  and  V 90 

PART  IV. — Discussion  of  the  results 94 

Summary 102 

References  to  literature 104 

Tables  I.  to  XVIII 104 

LIST  OF  TABLES. 

Table  I. — Pressure-temperature  observations. 

„  II. — Series      I.     Observations. 

HI.-     „        II. 

IV.-    „      III. 

V.-    „      IV. 

„  VI. — Latent  heat  calculation. 

„         VII. — I  and  Cp  from  smooth  curves. 
„        VIH. — &/>  between  pressure  curves  and  limit  curve. 
•  „  IX. — Collected  results.     T,  P,  I,  </>,  L  from  smooth  curves. 

„  X. — Comparison  of  pressure-temperature  observations. 

„  XI. — Sample  record,  Scries     I.     (Pressure,  heat,  weight,  Sic.). 

„         XII. —     „  „          „          I.     (Temperatures). 

„       XIII.—     „  „          „        II.     (Heat,  weight). 

„        XIV. —      „  „          „        II.     (Temperatures). 

XV.-     „  „         „      III.     (Heat,  weight). 

„       XVI. —     „  „          „      III.     (Temperatures). 

„      XVII. — Comparison  of  #</>  diagrams. 

„     XVIII. — New  data,  arranged  as  in  MOU.IKK'S  paper  and  KWINO'S  '  Mech.  Prod,  of  Cold.' 
VOL.  < 'CXI  I  [. A    490.  K    2  PublUhed  separately,  July  28,  1913. 


Pi:uK.    c.    FKi:U'KN    .IKNKFN    AND    Ml;.    l>.    R,    PYE   OX    THK 


PART  L— OHJECT,  SCOPE,  AND  THEORY  OF  EXPERIMENTS. 

THK  experiments  described  in  the  following  paper  were  originally  undertaken  to 

determine  the  Latent  Heat  of  Liquid  C0a  and  the  Specific  Heats  of  the  liquid  and 

of  the  gas  at  temperatures  below  —30°  C.,  which  is  the  lowest  temperature  for  which 

MOLLIER  has  calculated  them,  and  also  to  check  MOLLIER'S  Entropy-Temperature 

diagram  by  direct  experiment,  as  it  appeared  likely  that  the  calculated  results  might 

be  appreciably  wrong  near  the  limits  of  their   range.      The    results   of  the    first 

experiments  confirmed  this  expectation,  and  it  became  apparent  at  the  same  time  that 

MOI.I.IKU'S  6<f>  diagram  could  not  be  modified  to  agree  with  the  experimental  results 

without  some  further  data.      The   investigation  was  therefore    extended  so  as  to 

include    the    measurement    of   all    the    quantities    required    for    the    construction 

de  novo  of  a   6<f>  diagram   for   saturated   gas   at   low    temperatures.      Finally,   by 

Sir  ALFRED  EWING'S  suggestion,  the  range  of  the  experiments  was  further  extended 

to  higher  temperatures,  to  enable  the  diagram    to   be   constructed   nearly   to  the 

critical  point. 

The  experiments  made  to  carry  out  this  programme  were : — 

1.  The  determination  of  the  Pressure-Temperature  Curve  for  Saturated  Vapour  ; 

2.  Three  series  of  heat  measurements,  called  Series  I.,  II.,  and  III.,  to  determine 

the  Latent  Heat  L,  the  Total  Heat  I  of  the  liquid,  and  the  Specific  Heat  of 
the  gas ; 

3.  A  series  of  throttling  experiments,  called  Series  IV.,  to  determine  the  Joule- 

Thomson  effect  for  liquid  COa ; 

4.  A  series  of  direct  volumetric  measurements,  called  Series  V.,  to  determine  the 

Dilatation  and  Elasticity  of  liquid  C0a. 

Fhe  experiments  also  supply  data  from  which  may  be  calculated  :  Specific  Volume 
'saturated  vapour  (or  its  reciprocal,  the  Density) ;  relative  Densities  of  liquid  CO2 
at  saturation  pressures  ;  Specific  Heat  of  liquid  CO3  either  at  constant  pressure  or  at 
saturation  pressure. 

The  pressure-temperature  curve  has  been  often  observed  during  the  last  50  years  ; 

ific  volume   of  saturated   vapour  and   the   specific   heat   of  the   liquid   at 

.  pressure  have  not  been  observed  before  below  -25°  C. ;  the  latent  heat, 

heat  of  the  gas,  and  the  dilatation  and  elasticity  of  the  liquid  have  not 

rved  before  below  0°  C.     The  total  heat  of  the  liquid,  the  specific  heat 

onstant  pressure,  and  the  Joule-Thomson  effect  have  never  been 

The  latent  heat  has  often  been  calculated,  but  the  specific  volume 

ted  vapour,  on  which  the  calculations  are  based,  ha*  not  been  observed 

...  and  only  once  below  0°  C.,  so  that  all  calculations  below  -25°  C    are 

baaed  mi  axtrapplatiaaa. 


TIIKHMAI.    PBOPEBTBB   OF   CAl.T.ONir   ACID   AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.         (i«» 

l'Y.>in  the  results  of  these  six  sets  of  experiments  all*  the  data  were  calculated  for 
constructing  the  fy>  diagram  ('mm  +20°  C.  to  —50°  C.  The  diagram  is  shown  in 
fig.  12,  p.  79,  and  some  of  the  results  are  given  in  Table  IX. 

Tin-  experiments  WIT.-  i-.m  iud  mil  in  tin-  Kngineerinjr  I,alx>ratory  at  Oxford  with  a 
vapour- compression  free/ing  machine,  presented  to  the  Laboratory  by  BrasenoM 
College.  In  addition  to  the  usual  parts  the  apparatus  includes  a  pair  of  suspended 
flasks  by  \\liii-li  the  rate  of  flow  of  the  CO.,  round  the  circuit  can  be  measured.  The 
following  additional  apparatus  was  made  for  these  experiments: — Two  electrically 
heated  calorimeters,  one  of  which  always  replaced  the  refrigerating  tank  of  the 
free/ing  machine;  several  thermo-junctions  for  measuring  the  temperatures  of  the 
calorimeters  and  of  the  CO,  at  various  points  in  the  circuit ;  a  graduated  glass 
capillary  tul>e,  with  regulating  valves,  for  measuring  the  changes  of  volume  of  liquid 
( K  )3  under  varying  pressures  and  temperatures  in  Series  V.  experiments ;  and  a 
s|ie.-i:d  throttle- valve  for  Series  IV. 

The  gas  used  was  commercial  CO2,  supplied  by  Messrs.  Barrett  and  Elers,  Limited, 
of  London,  who  have  kindly  informed  the  authors  how  it  is  made.  Coke  is  burnt  in 
a  furnace  and  the  products  of  combustion,  after  being  washed  with  hot  and  cold 
water  in  scrubbers  filled  with  fragments  of  limestone  to  eliminate  any  SO3,  are  passed 
through  absorbing  towers  filled  with  coke  over  which  a  stream  of  potash  lye  flows 
which  absorbs  the  CO.,.  The  enriched  lye  is  then  heated  in  iron  boilers  and  the  CO,, 
driven  off  by  the  heat,  is  compressed  in  compound  pumps  into  the  steel  flasks  in 
which  it  is  sold.  It  is  dried  by  passing  over  calcium  chloride  between  the  first  and 
second  stage  of  compression.  The  gas  made  in  this  way  is  said  by  the  makers  to 
contain  no  impurities,  except  possibly  £  per  cent,  to  £  per  cent,  of  air  and  traces 
of  SOa.  These  traces  of  S02  were  probably  eliminated  with  the  moisture  in  the 
special  drying  appliances  used  in  these  experiments,  so  that  the  oidy  impurity  left 
was  air. 

To  estimate  the  amount  of  air  present  the  gas  was  analysed  in  a  modified  form  of 
HKMPEL'S  apparatus  specially  arranged  for  this  test.  About  100  c.c.  of  gas  was 
measured  over  mercury  in  a  burette  and  then  passed  into  the  potash  absorption  bulb. 
The  residue  of  undissolved  gas  (air)  was  then  drawn  back  into  a  small  burette  and 
measured  over  potash  solution.  The  apparatus  was  arranged  so  that  the  test  could 
!»•  repeated  as  often  as  desired  while  the  residue  accumulated  in  the  small  burette. 
In  this  way  a  sufficient  quantity  could  lx-  analysed  to  allow  of  an  accurate  deter- 
mination of  the  small  amount  of  air.  The  amount  of  air  found  was  only  O'll  per 
cent,  by  volume  ('073  per  cent,  by  weight).  ANDREWS,!  in  his  classical  experiments, 
never  was  able  to  reduce  the  air  in  the  gas  he  used  to  less  than  Boo  t°  roloo-  The 

h  This  is  not  strictly  accurate.  In  working  out  Series  V.  the  density  of  liquid  CO...  at  one  temperature 
is  needed.  BEIIN'S  result  has  IHJCII  used.  Any  possible  error  in  thia  has  no  appreciable  effect  on  the 
result.  With  this  exception  every  quantity  needed  has  been  measured. 

t  '1'hil.  Trans.,'  18G9,  p.  381. 


70  PROF.   •      FIMUIN    ..KNKIN   AND   MR   D.  R.   PYK  ON  THE 

pn^nce  of  thiB  small  amount  of  air  has  introduced  a  small  error  into  the  pressure- 
!.', „,,,,„„.  ,urv,.,  hut  does  not  appreciably  affect  the  results  of  any  of  the  other 
experiment* 


Fig.  1. 

The  general  arrangement  of  the  apparatus  connected  for  normal  working  is  shown 

diagrammatically  in  fig.  1.    The  gas  enters  the  pump  at  pressure  p2  and  is  compressed 

to  a  higher  pressure  />,.     It  is  then  condensed  in  the  condenser  at  the  corresponding 

saturation    temperature   fy.      From   the   condenser    it   flows  as  liquid  through  the 

weighing  flasks  to  the  throttle  valve  on  the  calorimeter.     In  passing  the  throttle 

valve  the  pressure  falls  to  p.2,  some  of  the  liquid  evaporates  and  the  temperature  falls 

to  Oj.     The  mixture  of  liquid  and  gas  then  enters  the  calorimeter,  where  the  rest  of 

the  liquid  evaporates,  taking  up  heat  at  the  constant  temperature  6a.     From  the 

calorimeter  the  gas  passes  back  to  the  pump.     In  order  to  make  sure  that  all  the 

liquid  has  evaporated,  the  gas  is  warmed  (superheated)  a  few  degrees  above  02  before 

it  leaves  the  calorimeter.      The  approximate  6<f>  diagram*  for  this  cycle  is  shown 

in  fig.  2. 

The  line  AB  represents  the  expansion  of  the  liquid  through  the  throttle  valve  from 
j>,0,  to  p£r  AB  is  a  line  of  constant  total  heat  I.  The  line  BE  represents  the 
evaporation  of  the  liquid  at  constant  pressure  p.t  and  temperature  Q.2.  The  line  EC 
represents  the  small  amount  of  superheating  from  f)2  to  03  at  constant  pressure  p2. 
The  line  CD  represents  the  adiabatic  compression  in  the  pump  from  p2  to  p,.  The 

*  Cf.  EWING  (4),  p.  80. 


TIIKRMAL    PROPKRTIKS  OF   CMJimMC    ACID   AT   LOW  TKMI'KK  ATURKS.         71 


line  DFA  represents  the  cooling  ami  oondeoMtion  in  the  condenser,  l»oth  at  constant 
pressure  pt. 

The   ])iv.s.surr-tiMn|MT:ituiv   mm-   was   iL-tcnniiicd  with  the  apparatus  working  in 
this  way  :  A  pressure  gauge  was  rumu-rted  to  the  pipe  immediately  after  the  throttle 


A. 


IA  const: 

B Pi 


ft    If 


Approximate  6t  diagram 
for  freezing  machine  cycle. 


Entropy 


r    Q. 


Fig.  2. 

valve  and  a  thermo-jiinction  inserted  at  the  same  place,  as  shown  in  fig.  1.  The  gas 
is  always  saturated  at  this  point  so  that  the  temperature  is  unaffected  by  radiation 
or  conduction  along  the  pipes.  By  varying  the  adjustment  of  the  throttle  valve  a 
series  of  readings  of  corresponding  pressures  and  temperatures  was  obtained ;  a 


Fig.  3. 

summary  of  the  ol«ervations  is  given  in  Table  I.  The  olwervations  were  plotted  and 
a  smooth  curve  drawn  through  them.  Figures  taken  from  the  smooth  curve  are 
i^iven  in  Table  IX.  The  smooth  curve  is  copied  in  fig.  18,  p.  95,  for  comparison  with 
previous  observations. 


7- 


,.I;|1|.    ,. 


.'FN-KTN   AND  MR.   1>.   R. 


ON  THE 


Serie*  I.  mea8urement8  were  also  made  with  the  apparatus  working  in  the  normal 
way  described  above,  two  thermo-junctions  and  a  pressure  gauge  being  connected  as 
sh^n  in  fig  3.  In  this  series  the  principal  quantities  measured  were  the  rate  of 
hW  ,,f  CO,  and  the  electrical  power  supplied  to  the  calorimeter  to  balance  the 
refrigeration.  From  these  data  the  refrigeration,  i.e.,  the  heat  absorbed  per  lb., 
represented  by  the  area  NBECQ  (fig.  2)  was  calculated.  This  is  the  heat  required 
to  evaporate  the  liquid  part  of  the  CO,  and  to  superheat  it  all  from  6,  to  08,  the  heat 
used  in  superheating  being  represented  by  the  area  PECQ.  A  series  of  experiments 
was  made  with  different  values  of  6r  A  summary  of  the  observations  is  given  in 
Table  II.  ;  the  results  are  also  given  in  column  a,  Table  VI. 

Experiments  were  not  made  at  temperatures  above  20°  C.  owing  to  the  increasing 
difficulties  of  manipulation.  At  the  higher  temperatures  the  weighing  flask  had  to 
he  heated  to  keep  the  pressure  above  the  evaporation  pressure.  At  the  same  time  its 
capacity  fell  off  rapidly  owing  to  the  great  expansion  of  the  liquid.  The  condenser 
and  pump  had  to  be  run  at  correspondingly  higher  temperatures  and  great  care 
exercised  lest  the  condenser  and  flasks  got  over-full  of  the  expanded  liquid. 


CALORIHf  TEH  1  CALOaiHf  TEK 


Fig.  4. 

Series  II. — For  this  series  the  normal  arrangement  of  the  apparatus  was  slightly 
modified,  as  shown  in  fig.  4.  The  liquid  C02,  before  reaching  the  throttle  valve,  was 
led  first  through  the  second  coil  in  calorimeter  I.,  so  that  its  temperature  was  reduced 
to  any  required  temperature  &„  and  then  through  calorimeter  II.,  in  which  it  was 
warmed  again  at  constant  pressure  to  any  desired  temperature  Qy.  The  quantities 
measured  were  the  rate  of  flow,  the  rise  of  temperature  of  the  liquid,  6y—6z,  and  the 
electric  power  supplied  to  calorimeter  II.  From  these  data  the  change  of  total 
heat  I  of  the  liquid  at  constant  pressure  for  the  range  9X  to  6y  was  calculated.  Two 
sets  of  experiments  were  made,  one  at  700  Ibs.  per  sq.  in.  pressure  and  one  at  900  Ibs. 
per  sq.  in.  pressure.  A  summary  of  the  observations  is  given  in  Table  III.  The 
observations  were  plotted  and  smooth  curves  drawn  through  them.  Figures  taken 
from  the  smooth  curves  are  given  in  Table  VII.  This  series  of  experiments  does 
not  determine  the  absolute  values  of  I,  but  only  differences  ;  the  zero  of  the  I  scale 
was  determined  later,  see  p.  80.  The  slope  of  the  I  curve  is  the  specific  heat  of  the 
liquid  at  constant  pressure.  Values  of  the  specific  heat  deduced  from  the  slope  of 
the  curves  are  given  in  Table  VII. 


Tlll.KMAI,    PROPERTIES  OF  GAUBONIC  ACID  AT   LOW  TEMPERATURES.         73 


111.  •--!•'.  ,r    (Ms    SLM'lrs    tin-    liorni.'il    :irr:iii^<Miii-iit   "f   tin-    ;ip|i;ir;ilus  w:is 

slightly  modified,  as  is  shown  in  fig.   5,  by  inserting  calorimeter  II.  between  calori- 
meter I.  and  the  pump.     The  gas  leaving  calori- 
meter I.  at  a  temperature  63  was  warmed  to  any 
desired  extent  in  calorimeter  II.     The  quantities 
measured  in  this  series  were  the  rate  of  flow  of 
COa,  the  rise  of  temperature  of  the  gas  in  calori- 
meter II.,  and  the  electrical  power  supplied  to 
calorimeter   II.      From   these   data    the   specific 
heat  of  the  gas  at  constant  pressure  was  calcu- 
lated.    A  series  of  measurements  was  made  with  different  values  of  Qr     The  results 
are  shown  in  fig.  6,  where  the  specific  heat  of  the  gas  near  the  limit  curve*  is  plotted 
against  the  pressure. 


CALOHIHC  ren  I   CALO*i*e  re  KM 
Fig.  5. 


0-6 


0-5 


0-4 


0-3 


0-2 


0-1 


Spec :   heat    of    C0£  jas 

at   const:  press. 
Near   the  .saturated  condition 


IOO 


zoo 


500 


400  500 

Lba/iq.incn. 
Fig.  6. 


600 


700 


600 


900 


Combining  the  results  of  Series  I.,  II.,  and  III.,  an  approximate  value  of  the  latent 
heat  may  now  be  calculated.  If  we  neglect  the  complications  introduced  by  the 
changes  of  volume  of  liquid  COa  (or  what  is  equivalent,  if  we  assume,  as  a  first 
approximation,  that  the  limit  curve  coincides  with  the  constant-pressure  curves) 
then  the  difference  of  total  "heat  I8— I,  from  63  to  0,  is  represented  in  fig.  2,  p.  71, 
by  the  area  RGAM. 

k  The  limit  curve  is  the  boundary  of  the  area  on  the  diagram  representing  saturated  vapour,  separating 
it  on  the  one  side  from  the  area  representing  liquid  and  on  the  other  from  the  area  representing  super- 
heated gas.  The  two  sides  of  the  curve  »re  called  the  "  liquid-limit  curve  "  and  the  "  gas-limit  curve  " ; 
they  meet  at  the  critical  point. 

VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  L 


74  ,.|;OF.   C.    FKKWKN  JKXKIN    AND   MR.   D.   R.   PYE  ON   THE 

Alao,  by  a  well-known  property  of  constant-pressure  lines, 

Area  RGBN  =  RGAM 


which  can  be  read  off  the  I  curves. 
Taking  any  experiment  of  Series  I.,  we  have 

Area  BQ,  given  by  Series  I.  (column  a,  Table  VI.)  ; 
„     EQ,  which  may  be  calculated  from  the  specific  heat  of  the  gas  obtained  by 

Series  III.  (column  y,  Table  VI.)  ; 
„     GN  =  I,—  ID  read  off  the  I  curves  obtained  by  Series  II.  (column  S,  Table  VI.). 

Whence  the  latent  heat,  L  =  BQ-EQ  +  GN,  may  be  found. 

On  the  same  assumptions  an  approximate  6<j>  diagram  may  be  constructed. 
Starting  at  the  zero-point  on  the  6<f>  diagram  (9  =  273°  C.  abs.,  0  =  0)  plot,  step  by 
step,  the  constant-pressure  line  corresponding  to  the  curve  of  I,  remembering 
that  on  the  6<j>  diagram  the  area  under  each  element  of  the  curve  is  equal  to 
the  corresponding  difference  of  I  ;  this  is  quickly  done  since  the  curve  is  almost 


$    T  R 


ft    JV 


Corrected   $t  diagram 
for  freezing    machine  cycle. 


Fig.  7. 

Since  we  are  neglecting  changes  of  volume  of  the  liquid,  this  curve  will 

»  with  the  liquid  limit  curve  (as  it  practically  does  in  the  Steam  diagram). 

the  gas-limit  curve,  mark  off  the  values  of  L/0  for  various  temperatures, 

the  hquid-limit  curve  and  measuring  to  the  right ;  joining  up  the  points 


THERMAL  PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES. 


75 


so  found  we  have  the  gas-limit  curve.  The  diagram  might  be  completed  by  adding 
the  I  lines,  &c.,  but  it  will  be  convenient  to  consider  first  the  modifications  required 
to  allow  for  the  changes  of  volume  of  the  liquid  CO,  which  have  so  far  been 
neglected. 

Fig.  7  represents  the  same  diagram  as  fig.  2  with  the  addition  of  some  lines  to 
show  the  effects  of  the  dilatation  and  elasticity  of  the  liquid. 

Let  AHK  be  the  constant-pressure  line  through  A,  in  the  liquid  area, 

Let  GA  represent  the  limit  curve  as  before, 

Let  GK  be  the  constant  I  line  through  G,  meeting  AHK  in  K. 

The  heating  of  the  liquid  CO,  in  Series  II.  experiments  is  now  represented  by  the 
line  KA,  instead  of  by  GA. 

The  true  value  of  L  is  found  as  follows  :  — 

L  =  GN  +  BQ—  EQ  as  before;  also  BQ  and  EQ  are  given,  as  before,  by  Series  I. 
and  III.  experiments,  but  GN  is  no  longer  I,—  I,.     We  now  have 

GN'=  IB-IG) 

=  IA—  IK,  since  AB  and  GK  are  constant  I  lines, 


=  (I,  —  I,)  +  (I,—  14),  using  suffixes  to  refer  to  the  temperatures  #„  0,,  and  04. 

I,—  I;,  is  read  off  the  I  curve  as  before,  but  I,—  I4  can  only  be  read  off  the  curve 
when  04  is  known.  The  quantity  I3—  14  may  be  regarded  as  a  small  correction  to  be 
applied  to  the  approximate  value  of  L  to  allow  for  the  elasticity  and  dilatation  of  the 
liquid. 

Series  IV.  experiments  were  made  to  determine  the  difference  of  temperature 
da—  Ot  between  H  and  K,  i.e.,  the  Joule-Thomson  effect  for  the  pressure  drop  Pi~p3. 
It  was  observed  directly  by  measuring  the  change  of  temperature  as  the  liquid  passed 
through  a  throttle  valve.  The  arrangement  of  the  apparatus  is  shown  in  fig.  8. 


Fig.  8. 

A  summary  of  the  observations  is  given  in  Table  V.     The  observations  are  plotted  in 
fig.  9  and  a  smooth  curve  drawn  through  them.     The  values  of  I,— 14  calculated  from 

L  2 


,  c.  M:K\\TN  .M:\KIN  AND  MR.  D.  R.  PYE  ON  THE 


this  curve  for  each  of  Series  I.  experiments  are  given  in  column  S  of  Table  VI.,  and 
tli.-  c,,rn-.-t«-.l  v.ilu.-s  of  L  in  the  last  column.  These  values  of  L  were  plotted  ;m<l 
values  taken  from  the  smooth  curve  are  given  in  column  5  of  Table  IX. 


+•3 
4-2 
+•1 
O 
—  I 
—2 
—  3 
—4 
—5 
—  6 

—7 
-8 

-•9 
-6 

^*^ 

^\° 

^Z~ 

^^ 

--^ 

~^^S. 

-Ss^ 

^V 

^5 

k 

\ 

Ser 

ies  W. 

\ 

\ 

i^se 
£nd    .. 

;  of  obse 

M 

rvations 
it 

\ 

\ 

\ 

0            -50            -40            -30             -20             -10                 0              +10             +2C 

Temp:  °C. 

Fig.  9. 

If  we  proceed  now  to  the  construction  of  the  true  6<j>  diagram  a  further  difficulty  is 
met  with.  If  a  constant-pressure  curve  is  drawn  as  before,  using  the  values  of  I 
already  obtained,  the  result  is  the  curve  KA.  The  difficulty  is  to  draw  the  true 
limit  curve  GA,  which  was  previously  assumed  to  coincide  with  KA.  The  authors 
have  been  unable  to  devise  any  direct  experiment  to  fix  the  position  of  the  limit 
curve  relatively  to  the  constant-pressure  curve  KA,  and  an  indirect  method  had  to 
be  used.  The  fundamental  thermodynamic  equations  give  the  well-known  equation* 

(**}  -        (**\ 
\dpJ0         \dO/P' 

Let  H,  fig.  7,  be  the  pointed.,;  then 

HG = **  -  r(i)  *• 

Jpi  \O,u,ip 

Thus  the  distance  fy  between  the  limit  curve  and  the  constant-pressure  curve  can 
*  Cy.  PMSTON'S  -Theory  of  Heat,1  p.  740,  2nd  edition. 


THERMAL   PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.         77 

be  calculated  from  the  temperature  coefficient  of  the  liquid.  This  coefficient*  does 
not  appear  to  have  been  determined  below  0°  C.,  so  the  experiments  called  Series  V. 
were  undertaken  to  measure  it.  AMAGAT'S  (5)  results  give  a  few  values  above  0°  C. 


Fig.  10. 

Series  V. — The  general  arrangement  of  the  apparatus  is  shown  in  fig.  10.  A 
capillary  glass  tube,  closed  at  the  bottom,  was  partly  filled  with  liquid  COa ;  on  the 
top  rested  a  mercury  indicator.  The  upper  end  of  the  tube  was  connected  through  a 
valve  to  a  flask  of  C0a  gas  at  high  pressure.  A  release  valve  was  also  connected. 
By  adjusting  these  two  valves  any  desired  pressure  could  be  obtained  in  the  glass 
tube.  The  glass  tube  was  placed  upright  in  the  calorimeter,  so  that  it  could  be  kept 
at  any  desired  temperature,  while  the  volume  of  the  liquid  CO3  was  read  directly 
by  noting  its  length  in  the  glass  tube  as  shown  by  the  position  of  the  mercury 
indicator. 

A  series  of  measurements  of  volume  were  made  at  different  temperatures  and 
pressures.  The  results  are  plotted  in  fig.  11,  with  pressure  and  volume  as  co-ordinates. 
The  slope  of  the  curves  is  the  elasticity  (dr/dp)t,  and  the  distance  between  the  curves 
divided  by  the  temperature  difference  is  the  dilatation  (dr/dS)p. 

To  calculate  $<f>,  however,  it  is  not  necessary  to  evaluate  these  functions,  for  the 
area  between  any  two  adjacent  curves  at  temperatures  Ql  and  6y  is 


*  The  specific  volume  of  the  liquid  at  low  temperatures  for  points  on  the  limit  curve  is  known.     This 
enables  the  rate  of  change  of  volume  with  temperature,  along  the  limit  curve,  to  be  calculated,  but  what  is 

required  is  (dv/dtyp,  which  is  equal  to 

dv/dO  +  (dvjdp)t  <lp/d9, 

where  dvjdO  and  dp/dO  are  taken  along  the  limit  curve. 


IM;oF.  C.  FREWEN  JENKIN  AND  MR.  D.   R.  PYE  ON  Till; 


P.V.  isothermal   curves 
for  liquid  C02. 

(Mean  results) 

Area,  scale :- 

I  sq.  cm  =  .00167  th':u- 


Points:  A  "and   dotted   curves    show    Amagats 
observations. 


ZOO          3OO          400  5OO  600  7OO  8OO          9OO         I,OOO          1,100 

Pressure,     Ibs.   per    sq:   inch. 

Fig.  11. 

If  the  area  between  the  0t  and  0a  curves  is  bounded  at  the  side  by  the  ordinates  at 
pressures  pt  and  pa,  then  the  area  is 


THERMAL  PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.         79 


EN  TROP  Y  -  TEMPERA  TURE 


01  -05 

and  therefore 


area        P*  idr\  ,         .    ,  , 

j-  I  dp  =  3<f>  between  pressure  curves  pl  and  p.f 
"i  —  "a       Jpi  \d6/f 

Similarly,  if  the  area  is  bounded  by  the  limit  curve  and  the  ordinate  at  j»,,  then 


area 


=  S<f>  between  limit  curve  and  pressure  curve  pt. 


corresponds  in  each  case  with  the  mean  temperature 


80 


PROF.  c.  FI:K\\KX  JENKIN  AND  MR.  D.  R.  PYE  ON  THE 


V-,hi,  of  fy  between  the  700-lb.  and  900-lb.  pressure  curves  and  the  limit  curve 
were  calculated  in  this  way  and  are  given  in  Table  VIII.  From  this  table  we  see 
that  the  700-lb.  and  900-lb.  pressure  curves  cut  the  0°  C.  temperature  line  at 
0  =  --IM.-J4  and  0  =  -'0049  respectively.  These  two  points  serve  as  the  starting 
fur  plotting  the  two  constant-pressure  curves  (700-lb.  and  900-lb.)  on  the  00 


diagram.  . 

The  corrected  00  diagram  may  now  be  constructed.  Ihe  result  is  shown  in 
fig.  12.  This  diagram  was  drawn  as  follows  :—  Starting  at  the  points  just  found, 
the  700-lb.  and  900-lb.  pressure  curves  were  drawn  as  before,  remembering  that  the 
area  under  each  curve  on  the  00  diagram  between  any  two  temperatures  equals  the 
difference  of  I  for  the  same  temperature  range.  The  liquid-limit  curve  was  then  set 
off  on  the  right  of  the  pressure  curves  by  plotting  the  small  values  of  $<f>  given  in 

Table  VIII. 

The  gas-limit  curve  was  then  plotted  by  measuring  off  the  values  of  L/0,  taken 
from  Table  VI.,  to  the  right  of  the  liquid-limit  curve. 

To  plot  the  constant  I  lines  it  is  first  necessary  to  find  a  starting  point.  At  the 
origin  (0  =  273,  0  =  0)  the  value  of  lo  is  given  by  the  equation  I0  =  Apv,  where 

p  is  the  saturation  pressure  at  0°  C.  =  508  Ibs.  per  sq.  in.  =  73,200  Ibs.  per  sq.  ft., 
v  is  the  volume  of  1  Ib.  of  liquid  =  "0173  cub.  ft.,* 
A  =  T^jVo  J  therefore  Io  =  '905  thermal  unit. 


The  point  on  the  700-lb.  curve  having  the  same  I  was  then  calculated  as  follows  :— 
The  change  of  temperature  at  0°  C.  is  taken  from  the  curve,  fig.  9,  p.  76,  viz.,  '24°  C. 
per  100  Ibs.  difference  of  pressure.  The  difference  of  pressure  is  700  —  508  =  192. 
Therefore  the  temperature  of  the  required  point  is  '24x1  '92  =  '46°  C.  In  other 
words,  I  =  '905  at  a  point  +  '46°  C.  on  the  700-lb.  pressure  curve.  Similarly, 
I  =  '905  at  a  point  +  '94°  G.  on  the  900-lb.  pressure  curve. 

Having  found  in  this  way  the  true  value  of  I  for  one  point  on  each  of  the  pressure 
lines,  we  can  mark  the  true  zero  on  the  scale  of  the  I  curves,  so  that  they  shall  give 
absolute  values  of  I  instead  of  only  differences  (see  p.  72).  Using  the  new  scales, 
the  points  on  the  700-lb.  curve  corresponding  to  I  =  0,  —5,  —10,  —15,  —20,  and  —25 
were  marked  off  on  the  00  diagram;  also  the  points  on  the  900-lb.  curve  corre- 
sponding to  1  =  45,  +10,  and  +15.  The  corresponding  points  on  the  limit  curve 
were  then  calculated  from  the  difference  of  pressure  multiplied  by  the  rise  or  fall 
of  temperature,  given  in  fig.  9.  Having  found  these  points,  the  rest  of  the  I  curves 
within  the  saturated  area  are  easily  constructed.  Draw  a  horizontal  (constant 
temperature)  line  through  one  of  the  points,  say,  where  I  =  0,  on  the  limit  curve. 
This  is  at  temperature  -1°  C.  =  272°  abs.  Along  this  line,  starting  at  the  limit 
curve,  mark  off  a  series  of  points,  equally  spaced,  at  distances  S<j>  =  ^  apart.  These 
will  be  points  on  the  +5,  +10,  &c.,  I  lines. 

*  B£HN's(6)  value  of  the  density  of  liquid  C02  at  0°  C.  is  -925. 


THERMAL    PROPERTIES   OF  CARBONIC  ACID   AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES. 


81 


Five  horizontal  lines  were  divided  in  this  way  and  the  I  lines  drawn  through  them. 
The  values  of  I  for  the  liquid,  given  in  Table  IX.,  were  found  by  interpolation.  The 
values  of  I  given  for  the  gas  were  obtained  l>y  adding  the  corresponding  values  of  L 
to  the  values  of  I  for  the  liquid. 

Approximate  constant-pressure  lines  in  the  dry  area  may  be  drawn,  if  the  specific 
heat  is  assumed  to  be  constant.  They  are  logarithmic  curves  given  by  the  equation 

d<f>  _  a_ 
d6~  6' 

where  a  is  the  specific  heat  of  the  gas  at  constant  pressure. 

40 — . . . 


20 


<J 
o 


-IO 


-20 


-30 


-40 


\ 


Comparison    of 
.tropy-tempera.tu.re    diagrams. 
Dotted  lines  are  plotted  from 

Mollier's   figures. 


-•1O  -08  -oe   -o*  -ot     O 


•ot    -O4    «e    -oe  -1O 
Entropy . 

Fig.  13. 


•16       -1C      -2O   -ti      •£•»       -U 


These  curves  are  drawn  in  the  diagram  as  straight  lines,  since  for  the  short  length 
shown  the  curvature  is  imperceptible.     The  values  of  o-  are  taken  from  the  curve, 

VOL.  CCXIII. A.  M 


82  PROF.  C.  FREWEN  JENKIN  AND  MR.   P.   R-   PYE  ON  THE 

fig.  6,  p.  73.     They  agree  closely  with  MOLLIEE'S  curves,  as  may  be  seen  in  fig.  13  (p.  81), 
where  a  few  of  each  (at  different  pressures)  are  drawn  for  comparison. 

Tim  four  dryness  curves  on  the  diagram  were  drawn  by  dividing  the  distances 
between  the  limit  curves  into  quarters.  This  completes  the  construction  of  the 
diagram. 

PART  II.— DETAILED  DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  APPARATUS  AND  METHOD  OF  CARRYING 
our  THE  EXPERIMENTS  SERIES  I.,  II.,  AND  III. 

The  compressor  is  a  single  acting  pump  made  by  Messrs.  J.  and  E.  Hall,  of 
Dartford.  It  is  driven  by  a  variable  speed  electric  motor.  The  piston-rod  gland  is 
formed  of  a  pair  of  cup-leathers,  between  which  oil  is  forced  by  an  auxiliary  piston, 
thus  no  leakage  of  CO.,  takes  place,  but  a  little  oil  enters  the  cylinder,  and  is  pumped 
over  with  the  CO3 ;  it  is  mostly  caught  in  an  oil  separator,  but  a  trace  of  oil  is  carried 
round  the  whole  circuit  with  the  CO-j.  Under  ordinary  conditions  the  pump  runs 
cold,  but  when  working  under  the  abnormal  conditions  of  some  of  the  tests  it  ran  hot 
and  gave  trouble  till  a  water-jacket  was  fitted  round  the  cylinder. 

The  condenser  is  a  coil  of  pipe  in  a  tank  through  which  cooling  water  flows. 
The  drying  flask  is  a  steel  flask  containing  a  little  phosphorus  pentoxide.  The  gas 
is  led  in  by  a  pipe  leading  nearly  to  the  bottom  of  the  flask  and  leaves  by  a  pipe  from 
the  top.  A  few  ounces  of  PaO5  were  put  in  the  bottom  of  the  flask  and  renewed  from 
time  to  time.  When  the  apparatus  was  first  tried  great  trouble  was  experienced 
with  moisture  which  collected  and  plugged  the  throttle  valve  with  ice.  The  whole 
apparatus  had  to  be  thoroughly  dried  out  and  all  the  gas  dried  by  passing  it  through 
calcium  chloride  in  the  drying  flask  before  the  difficulty  was  got  over.  After  this  all 
fresh  charges  of  gas  were  passed  through  a  small  flask  filled  with  calcium  chloride 
before  they  entered  the  apparatus,  and  the  above  described  drying  flask  was  kept  in 
circuit  to  eliminate  any  traces  there  might  be  left.  Some  of  the  oil  carried  round  by 
the  CO;,  collected  in  this  flask. 

The  u-etghing  apparatus  (see  fig.  1,  p.  70)  consists  of  two  steel  flasks,  each  capable  of 
holding  -in  11  is.  of  liquid  CO.,;  both  were  originally  hung  on  spring  balances.  Each 
flask  has  valves  at  the  top  and  bottom  so  that  they  may  be  alternately  filled  and 
emptied.  The  connections  to  the  flasks  are  made  of  coils  of  copper  pipe,  flexible 
enough  to  allow  of  a  small  vertical  motion.  The  spring  balances  were  calibrated  to 
allow  for  the  stiffness  of  these  coils.  This  arrangement  had  certain  defects  and  was 
subsequently  modified.  In  order  to  be  sure  that  no  CO2  passed  unweighed,  it  was 
necessary  to  stop  the  supply  of  C0a  from  one  flask  before  starting  it  from  the  other ; 
this  inevitably  caused  a  momentary  variation  in  the  rate  of  flow.  There  was  also 
some  doubt  as  to  the  effect  of  the  weight  of  C08  in  the  coils  of  pipe  connected  to  the 
flasks,  which  might  be  full  or  empty  at  the  moment  of  weighing.  The  spring- 
balances  were  divided  in  pounds,  and  tenths  of  a  pound  could  be  roughly  estimated. 


THERMAL   PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES. 


83 


cent.      No    calibration 
copper  pipes  is  necessary. 


The  readings,  however,  had  to  be  made  in  haste,  and  the  probable  error  in  the  weight 
of  COa  might  amount  to  nearly  1  per  cent.  The  balances  had  to  be  frequently 
recalibrated,  as  the  stiffness  of  the  pipes  was  found  to  change  gradually.  Only  three 
of  the  17  observations  in  Table  VI.,  viz.,  those  at  —  26'1,  —14*9,  and  — 8'6,  were  made 
while  working  in  this  way. 

To  get  over  these  defects  the  following  modification  was  made : — One  flask  was 
hung  on  a  steelyard,  the  arm  of  which  was  allowed  only  a  very  minute  movement. 
When  the  arm  fell  it  made  an  electric  contact  and  rang  a  bell.  This  arrangement 
was  found  to  be  so  sensitive  that  it  would  turn  with  '01  Ib.  When  the  arm  fell  it 
was  raised  again  by  hanging  a  weight  (usually  1  Ib.)  on  the  flask.  When  another 
pound  of  COa  had  passed  out  of  the  flask  the  bell  rang  again  and  another  weight  was 
hung  on,  and  so  on.  The  increased  sensitiveness  of  this  arrangement  made  it  possible 
to  record  the  rate  of  flow  of  CO,  accurately  at 
short  intervals  and  to  complete  the  whole  test 
with  one  flask  full  or  less  of  CO,,  for  as  small 
a  quantity  as  10  Ibs.  could  be  weighed  to  -^  per 
No  calibration  or  allowance  for  the 
A  simple  dash-pot 

made  of  a  disc  of  tin  in  a  vessel  of  oil  got  over 
all  difficulties  due  to  vibration  without  reducing 
the  sensitiveness. 

The  calorimeters  are  tin-plate  tanks  contain- 
ing coils  of  copper  pipe  and  electric  heaters; 
the  tanks  are  lagged  on  the  outside  to  prevent 
the  inflow  of  heat.  The  larger  calorimeter, 
fig.  14,  contains  two  copper  coils  and  the  smaller 
one  a  single  coil.  The  coils  can  be  connected  in 
different  ways  for  the  different  series  of  tests. 
Calcium  chloride  brine  was  used  to  fill  the  tanks 
for  the  first  experiments,  but  was  replaced 
later  by  methylated  spirits,  which  answered 
much  better.  Special  care  was  taken  in  the 
ilfsign  of  the  calorimeters  to  provide  a  definite 
path  for  the  circulation  of  the  liquid,  which  was  maintained  by  a  screw  propeller 
driven  by  an  electric  motor.  The  large  calorimeter  was  originally  lagged  with 
2  inches  of  slag  wool ;  this  was  found  to  be  insufficient  and  2  inches  of  felt  were 
added,  covered  by  varnished  calico  to  keep  out  the  moisture.  A  wooden  top  was 
fitted,  covered  by  felt  and  calico.  The  small  calorimeter,  which  was  completed  after 
experience  had  been  gained  with  the  larger  one,  was  wrapped  in  2£  inches  cotton 
wool  surrounded  by  about  2  inches  slag  wool,  all  contained  in  a  wooden  box.  The 
cover  was  formed  of  3  inches  of  wood.  Several  sorts  of  heater  were  tried  and  failed  ; 

M  2 


Fig.  14. 


PROF.  C.    FRKWEN  JENKIN  AND   MR   D.   R   PYK  ON   THE 

""    t 

liM,lly  coils  of  No.  16  S.W.G.  Eureka  wire,  insulated  with  vulcanized  indiarubber 

Lu  d  directly  on  to  the  coils  of  the   evaporating    pipe,    were   tried;    these 

perfectly     Each  coil  was  about  50  yards  long,  had  a  resistance  of  about 

To  InT  L  Juld  absorb  1000  watts,  taking  10  amperes  from  the  100-volt  power 

m,ins      There  are  three  such  coils  in  the  larger  and  two  in  the  smaller  calorimeter. 

Jfcomtmtflt  of  the  Electrical  lfa*-The  electrical  power  entering  the  calon- 
meters  was  calculated  from  the  measured  resistances  of  the  heating  coils  and  the 
ol*erved  E  M  F  across  their  terminals.  The  E.M.F.  was  measured  by  means  of  a 
Siemens  millivoltmeter  with  fine  pointer  and  mirror,  which  was  calibrated  against  a 
cadmium  cell  with  N.P.L.  certificate.  The  scale  is  divided  in  single  volts  and  ^  vol 
can  be  accurately  estimated.  Two  of  the  coils  in  the  large  calorimeter  were  always 
connected,  when  in  use,  on  the  full  supply  voltage  (100),  and  the  third  was  used  in 
series  with  an  adjustable  resistance.  The  voltmeter  has  a  two-way  switch  so  that 

the  two  E.M.Fs.  could  be  read  successively.  Read- 
ings were  taken  every  minute  throughout  the  tests. 
At  the  full  voltage  of  100  an  error  of  1  volt  means 
an  error  of  '2  per  cent,  in  the  power.  At  the  lowest 
readings,  30  volts,  an  error  of  '1  volt  means  an  error 
of  '6  per  cent,  in  the  power.  The  resistance  of  each 
heating  coil  was  measured  before  the  tests  were 
begun  by  a  bridge  which  was  checked  against  a 
standard  ohm  with  N.P.L.  certificate.  The  resist- 
ances were  measured  again  after  the  tests  were 
completed  and  had  not  altered  appreciably.  No 
temperature  correction  was  made  as  the  coils  were 
made  of  Eureka,  but  corrections  were  made  for  the 
resistance  of  the  leads. 

The  temperature  measurements  were  all  made 
with  Eureka-copper  thermo-couples.  The  couples 
were  made  of  No.  22  gauge  double  cotton  and  india- 
rubber-covered  Eureka  and  copper  wire,  all  cut  from  the  same  coils,  soldered  together 
at  the  ends.  The  couples  used  in  the  baths  for  measuring  the  temperature  of  the 
circulating  liquid  were  put  into  rubber  tubes,  the  bare  ends  projecting  about  ^  inch. 
The  couples  used  for  measuring  the  temperature  of  the  CO2  were  held  in  the  special 
fittings  shown  in  fig.  15,  so  that  the  bare  wires  projected  into  the  CO2  about 
lj  inches.  The  wires  were  carried  through  the  gumnetal  plugs  in  fine  rubber  tubing 
(bicycle  valve  tubing).  The  holes  in  the  gumnetal  were  tapered  and  small  brass 
beads  were  soldered  on  the  wires,  so  that  when  the  wires  were  drawn  back  the  beads 
jammed  in  the  holes.  This  simple  device  made  an  insulated  joint  which  was  gas-tight 
under  the  highest  pressures  used  (1100  Ibs.  per  sq.  inch). 

Preliminary  calibrations  showed   that  the  relation   between   the    E.M.F.   of  the 


Fig.  15. 


THERMAL   PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.         85 

thermo-junctions  and  temperature  could  not  be  satisfactorily  represented  by  the 
empirical  formula  often  used,  viz.,  log  E  =  nlog  t  +  m.  A.  calibration  curve  was 
therefore  drawn,  points  on  it  being  obtained  as  follows.  For  temperatures  between 
+  100°  C.  and  0"  C.  the  junction  was  compared  with  a  standard  mercury  thermometer 
with  N.P.L.  certificate. 

At  —20*  C.  it  was  compared  with  a  mercury  thermometer  which  had  Ix'en  vi-ritii-il 
at  that  temperature  by  the  N.P.L.  The  melting-point  of  mercury  was  then  ol»erved. 
The  mercury  was  purified  by  dropping  it  through  nitric  acid,  washing  it  in  wat«T,  drying 
it  at  120°  C.,  and  finally  distilling  it  in  vacuo.  About  l£  Ibs.  of  the  purified  mercury 
was  put  in  a  glass  vessel  and  frozen  by  packing  it  with  COa  snow.  The  mercury 
was  then  gradually  melted  and  the  temperature  of  the  melting-point  observed.  There 
was  no  difficulty  in  keeping  the  mercury  half-melted  and  half-frozen  for  any  length  of 
time  desired.  The  melting-point  was  assumed  to  be  —  38°'80  C.*  A  calibration  curve 
was  drawn  through  these  points  and  extrapolated  to  —50°  C.  As  this  extrapolation 
was  open  to  doubt  a  further  point  at  —50°  C.  was  afterwards  obtained  by  comparison 
with  a  platinum-resistance  thermometer  which  had  been  carefully  calibrated  against 
the  standard  thermometer.  The  new  point  obtained  in  this  way  fell  within  -,1,,0  C.  of 
the  curve,  thus  confirming  it  satisfactorily.  The  curve  is  believed  to  be  correct  to 

A'c. 

To  maintain  the  other  junctions  of  the  wires  at  a  steady  known  temperature  they 
were  immersed  in  a  large  tin  of  paraffin  oil,  well  jacketed  with  slag  wool,  fitted  with 
a  calibrated  thermometer  and  lens  so  that  the  temperature  of  the  "  cold  junction  "  (in 
our  case  usually  the  warmer  of  the  two)  could  be  read  to  T,\0°  C.  The  oil  was  stirred 
by  blowing  air  into  it.  An  incandescent  lamp  was  placed  in  the  oil,  so  that  the  oil 
could  be  warmed  to  approximately  atmospheric  temperature.  The  temperature  of 
the  oil  was  read  several  times  during  each  test  and  rarely  varied  more  than  t\y°  C. 

The  E.M.F.  produced  by  the  thermo-couples  was  measured  against  the  standard 
cadmium  cell  by  a  potentiometer  with  twenty  1-ohm  coils  and  a  gilt  manganin  slide- 
wire,  1  m.  long,  and  of  just  over  1-ohm  resistance.  Special  precautions  were  taken 
to  avoid  thermo-electric  effects.  The  various  thermo-junctions  could  be  switched  on 
in  turn  to  the  potentiometer  by  a  two-pole  six-way  selector  switch,  designed  to  avoid 
thermo-electric  effects.  The  potentiometer  was  sensitive  enough  to  measure  tempe- 
rature differences  of  7^°  C.  Such  accuracy  was  of  use  when  measuring  the  small  rise 
or  fall  of  the  temperature  of  the  bath  during  the  run ;  also  in  Series  IV.  experiments, 
which  depend  on  small  differences  of  temperature,  and  in  measuring  the  slow 
temperature  rise  during  radiation  tests. 

The  pressure  of  the  gas  was  measured  by  steel  tube  Bourdon  gauges  made  by 
Messrs.  Schaeffer  and  Budenberg  with  specially  fine  needles  and  fine  scale-divisions. 
They  were  calibrated  by  means  of  a  dead-weight  testing  machine,  in  which  a  dead- 

*  CHAPI-UIS,  1900,  quoted  KAYE  and  LABY,  p.  48.  Dr.  J.  A.  BARKER,  of  the  N.P.L.,  has  informed 
the  authors  that  38° -86  C.  is  probably  a  more  accurate  figure. 


86  PROF.  C.  FREWEN  JENKIN   AND  MR.  D.  R.   PYE  ON  THE 

weight  rests  on  a  plunger  in  an  oil  cylinder.  There  was  some  doubt  as  to  the 
effective  area  of  the  piston,  since  it  was  not  exactly  uniform  in  diameter,  and  there 
was  a  small  clearance  between  it  and  the  cylinder.  In  order  to  clear  up  this  point 
the  testing  machine  was  checked  against  a  mercury  column  about  1  m.  high.  The 
value  of  the  effective  area  of  the  plunger  was  found  in  this  way ;  it  only  differed  by 
Bio  from  the  maximum  measured  area.  The  testing  machine  only  gave  pressures  up 
to  400  Ibs.  per  sq.  inch.  Up  to  this  pressure  the  gauges  showed  a  practically 
constant  error,  and  it  was  assumed  that  the  error  remained  the  same  at  the  higher 

pressures. 

The  gauge  used  for  the  pressure-temperature  curve,  and  for  experiments  where 
accurate  high-pressure  readings  were  needed,  was  subsequently  calibrated  for  its 
whole  range  by  the  N.P.L. ;  the  results  agreed  closely  with  those  obtained  by  the 
authors.  In  a  few  of  the  experiments,  where  accurate  low  pressures  were  needed,  a 
low-pressure  gauge  was  used,  which  was  calibrated  over  its  whole  range.  The 
pressures  are  believed  to  be  correct  to  about  1  Ib.  per  sq.  in. 

Adjustments. — Before  beginning  any  test  the  apparatus  was  run  for  a  considerable 
time  while  the  conditions  were  adjusted  to  what  was  required  ;  the  test  was  not 
begun  until  a  steady  regime  had  been  attained  and  all  the  parts  had  reached  steady 
temperatures ;  moreover,  unless  a  test  was  completed  without  anything  more  than 
trifling  changes  of  any  of  the  conditions,  the  results  were  discarded.  The  conditions 
were  adjusted  by  regulating  the  speed  of  the  pump,  opening  or  closing  the  throttle 
valve,  and  switching  on  more  or  less  electrical  power  to  the  calorimeters.  While  the 
adjustments  were  being  made  the  flask  B  was  emptied  and  the  flask  A  filled,  so  that 
before  the  actual  test  began  the  C02  was  circulating  through  A,  which  was  full.  The 
potentiometer  and  the  temperature  of  the  cold  junction  were  also  adjusted. 

As  soon  as  everything  was  ready,  the  valve  on  the  top  of  flask  A  was  closed  and 
that  on  B  opened,  and  the  regular  readings  of  all  the  instruments  was  commenced. 
In  most  tests  these  readings  were  made  every  minute.  Each  time  the  weighing  bell 
rang  the  time  was  entered  to  the  nearest  second — the  first  ring  marking  the  time  of 
start  of  the  test,  which  usually  continued  till  the  flask  was  almost  empty. 

In  Series  I.  the  apparatus  was  connected  as  shown  in  fig.  3,  p.  71,  the  object  being 
to  measure  the  heat  represented  by  the  area  NBCQ  (fig.  7,  p.  74)  for  a  series  of  tempe- 
ratures 0,,  ranging  from  the  highest  to  the  lowest  attainable.  To  keep  the  rate  of  flow 
of  CO,  within  convenient  limits  the  pump  was  run  as  slowly  as  possible  for  the  higher 
values  of  0,  and  as  fast  as  possible  for  the  lower  values  of  02.  The  temperature  6a 
was  not  directly  measured,  but  was  deduced  by  the  pressure-temperature  curve  from 
tin-  pressure  shown  by  the  gauge  connected  to  the  pipe  leaving  the  calorimeter  ;  the 
tlm.ttle  valve  was  adjusted  so  as  to  keep  this  pressure  steady  at  the  figure  selected 
The  electrical  power  was  adjusted  so  as  to  keep  the  temperature  of 

I  the  percentage  of  air  present  was  not  always  approximately  constant,  this  method  of  estimating 
9t  it  liable  to  error. 


THERMAL   PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.         87 

the  bath  a  few  degrees  above  6a,  so  as  to  make  sure  that  the  gas  leaving  the  calori- 
meter was  slightly  superheated.     This  was  checked  by  the  direct  measurement  of  the 
final  gas  temperature  ft,  by  a  thermo-junction  in  the  pipe. 
During  the  test  the  following  observations  were  made  : — 
Times  when  the  weighing  l>ell  rang  ; 
K.M.F.  on  each  heating  coil,  observed  every  minute  ; 
Pressure  of  gas  leaving  coil,          „  „  „       ; 

Temperature  fy  of  liquid  OCX,  before  the  throttle  valve,  every  three  minutes  ; 
„  of  gas  63  leaving  calorimeter,  every  three  minutes ; 

„  ,,  bath,  every  three  minutes  ; 

„  ,,  cold  junction,  several  times  during  test ; 

„  „  atmosphere,          „          „          „         „    . 

During  the  test  small  adjustments  of  the  throttle  valve  and  of  the  electric  power 
were  made  so  as  to  keep  the  pressure  and  bath  temperature  as  constant  as  possible. 
As  an  example,  the  complete  records  for  one  experiment  are  given  in  Tables  XI. 
and  XII.  The  times  when  the  weighing  bell  rang  were  plotted  as  a  check  on  the 
uniformity  of  the  rate  of  flow  of  CO.,  during  the  experiment.  The  initial  temperatures 
of  the  liquid  COa  were  plotted  to  obtain  the  true  mean. 

In  Series  II.  the  apparatus  was  connected  as  shown  in  tig.  4,  p.  72,  the  object  being  to 
measure  the  total  heat  I  of  the  liquid,  i.e.,  the  heat  represented  by  the  area  SKAM, 
fig.  7,  p.  74,  for  a  series  of  ranges  of  temperature.  The  speed  of  the  pump  was  settled 
as  in  Series  I.  The  electrical  power  entering  the  large  calorimeter  was  adjusted  so  as 
to  keep  its  temperature  a  few  degrees  below  6t,  so  that  the  liquid  C02  might  be  cooled 
to  the  desired  temperature  64.  The  electrical  power  put  into  the  small  calorimeter 
was  adjusted  so  as  to  keep  it  at  the  selected  temperature  0,.  The  throttle  valve  was 
adjusted  so  as  to  keep  the  evaporation  temperature  a  little  below  the  temperature  of 
the  large  calorimeter,  but  this  temperature  was  of  no  importance  in  this  series. 

During  the  test  the  following  observations  were  made : — 

Times  when  the  weighing  bell  rang  ; 

E.M.F.  on  each  heating  coil  in  calorimeter  II.,  observed  every  minute ; 

Temperature  6t  of  liquid  COa  entering  calorimeter  II.,  every  three  minutes  ; 

>,  Qi         »  „    leaving  „  „         „          „          „        ; 

„  of  bath,  calorimeter  II.,  observed  every  three  minutes  ; 

„  ,,   cold  junction,  several  times  during  test ; 

„  „   atmosphere,          „          „          

No  observations  were  entered  for  the  large  calorimeter,  which  was  only  used  as  a 
cooler  for  the  liquid,  but  the  power  was  adjusted  as  required  to  keep  its  temperature 
constant. 

As  an  example,  the  complete  records  for  one  experiment  are  given  in  Tables  XIII. 
and  XIV. 


88  PROF.   C.   FKKWKN   .IKNKIN  AND   MR.   D.   H.   PYE  ON   THE 

In  Series  III.  the  apparatus  was  connected  as  shown  in  fig.  5,  p.  73,  the  object  being 
to  measure  the  specific  heat  of  the  gas  at  various  temperatures  near  the  saturation 
points.  Tin-  .•iil.jiistiiHMits  of  the  pump,  throttle  valve,  and  electrical  power  for  the 
large  calorimeter  were  made  exactly  as  in  Series  I.  The  electrical  power  put  into 
the  small  calorimeter  was  adjusted  so  as  to  keep  it  at  a  steady  temperature,  a 
moderate  amount  above  6*  It  was  not  possible  to  start  heating  the  gas  exactly 
at  0,,  but  0,  was  kept  as  close  to  0.,  as  possible,  so  that  the  range  through  which  the 
gas  was  heated  began  only  a  few  degrees  above  the  saturation  temperature.  The 
actual  ranges  are  shown  in  lines  4  and  5,  Table  IV.  The  last  line  gives  the  mean 
specific  heat  for  this  range  of  temperature. 

During  the  test  the  following  observations  were  made  :— 

Times  when  weighing  bell  rang  ; 

E.M.F.  on  each  heating  coil  in  calorimeter  II.,  observed  every  minute ; 

Temperature  93  of  gas  entering  calorimeter  II.,  every  three  minutes  ; 

,,  ,,       »    leaving  ,,  ,,         ,,          ,,  „         , 

„  „     bath,  calorimeter  II.,  every  three  minutes  ; 

„  „     cold  junction,  several  times  during  test ; 

„  „     atmosphere,          ,,  „  ,,         ,,    . 

As  an  example,  the  complete  records  for  one  experiment  are  given  in  Tables  XV. 
and  XVI.  The  times  when  the  weighing  bell  rang  were  plotted  as  a  check  on  the 
uniformity  of  the  rate  of  flow  of  CO.,  during  the  experiment. 

Corrections. 

Before  making  use  of  the  data  obtained  in  the  tests,  it  is  necessary  to  consider  the 
effects  of  differences  between  the  actual  and  theoretical  cycles  and  also  the  corrections 
for  radiation,  conduction,  and  change  of  temperature  of  the  calorimeter  during 
the  test. 

Differences  betiveen  the  Actual  and  the  Ideal  Cycle. 

(i.)  Friction  in  the  evaporation  coil  produces  a  small  difference  of  pressure  between 
the  two  ends.  The  evaporation,  therefore,  should  not  be  represented  by  the  constant- 
pressure  line  BE  (fig.  7),  but  by  a  curved  line  starting  a  little  above  B  and  falling 
to  E.  It  is  easy  to  show  that  this  has  no  effect  on  the  heat  absorbed,  which  is 
always  IB-IA,  and  is  accurately  represented  by  the  rectangle  NBEP. 

(ii.)  The  vapour  is  moving  in  the  pipe  with  some  velocity  and  consequently 
possesses  kinetic  energy.  A  simple  calculation  shows  that  the  kinetic  energy  is 
always  small  enough  to  be  neglected. 

(lii.)  The  compression  in  the  pump  is  not  adiabatic  and  there  are  other  deviations 
in  the  condenser,  but  as  this  part  of  the  cycle  is  not  included  in  the  measurements 
they  have  no  effect. 


THERMAL  PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.         89 

(iv.)  Change  of  Temperature  of  the.  Hath  during  a  Test. — The  temperatures  of  the 
bath  at  the  beginning  and  end  of  a  test  were  accurately  determined  by  taking  several 
observations  of  temperature  at  short  intervals  before  and  after  the  actual  moment  of 
the  start  or  finish  and  plotting  them.  The  temperature  at  the  actual  moment 
of  start  or  finish  was  then  road  from  the  graph.  Any  change  of  temperature  of  the 
bath  showed  that  the  electric  heat  supplied  had  been  slightly  too  much  or  too  little. 
The  balance  of  heat  (excess  or  shortage)  is  simply  the  temperature  rise  or  fall 
multiplied  by  the  water  equivalent  of  the  calorimeter.  The  water  equivalent  was 
determined  by  a  simple  heating  experiment  when  the  bath  was  at  approximately  the 
atmospheric  temperature  so  that  radiation  could  be  neglected.  The  results  obtained 
in  this  way  are  not  quite  accurate  since  the  heat  capacity  of  the  lagging  varies  with 

the  rate  of  heating. 

Radiation. 

A  number  of  experiments  were  made  to  determine  the  rate  at  which  heat 
entered  the  calorimeters  from  the  surrounding  air  before  concordant  results  were 
obtained.  In  the  end  good  results  were  arrived  at  and  the  radiation  was  found  to  be 
proportional  to  the  difference  of  temperature  between  the  calorimeter  and  the 
atmosphere.  The  rate  for  the  large  calorimeter  was  '83°  C.  per  hour  with  a 
temperature  difference  of  40°  C.  The  water  equivalent  being  97 '5  this  radiation 
corresponds  to  *83x97'5  =  81  thermal  units  per  hour  for  40°  C.  difference  of  tempe- 
rature. The  small  calorimeter  rate  was  1°'92  C.  per  hour  or  I'92xl5  =  28'8  thermal 
units  per  hour  for  40°  C.  difference  of  temperature.  These  figures  include  the 
mechanical  work  put  in  by  the  stirrer  motors,  which  in  the  small  calorimeter  was 
measured  and  found  to  be  about  2 '2  thermal  units  per  hour. 

Conduction  along  the  Pipes. 

The  calorimeter  coils,  and  most  of  the  connecting  pipes,  were  made  of  copper, 
£  inch  external  diameter,  J  inch  internal  diameter.  Such  a  pipe  would  conduct  about 
11  thermal  units  per  hour  with  a  temperature  gradient  of  40°  C.  per  foot.  To 
minimise  conduction,  the  small  calorimeter  had  a  piece  of  thin-walled  steel  pipe" 
inserted  in  both  the  ingoing  and  outgoing  connections  which  would  conduct  heat  at 
about  one-sixth  of  the  above  rate.  All  the  pipes  were  well  lagged.  When  the 
apparatus  is  working  it  can  easily  be  shown  that  there  can  be  only  a  very  small 
temperature  gradient  beyond  the  thermo-junctions  so  that  no  appreciable  conduction 
can  take  place.  Temperature  measurements  along  the  pipes  confirmed  this.  When 
the  vapour  is  not  circulating  the  conditions  are  not  quite  the  same  and  a  small 
amount  of  conduction  takes  place.  This  conduction  makes  the  apparent  radiation 
rather  too  large,  so  that  the  corrections  applied  for  radiation  are  a  little  too  large. 
An  approximate  estimate  shows  that  the  error  introduced  is  not  greater  than 
'3  thermal  units  in  the  value  of  L  at  the  lowest  temperature  and  that  it  will  not  be 
appreciable  above  —30°  C. 

VOL.  ccxni. — A.  N 


90  PROF.  C.  FREWKN  JENKIN  AND  MR.   D.   R.   PYE  ON  THE 

I'M;  i   III   -DETAILED  DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  APPARATUS  AND  METHOD  OF 

CARRYING   OUT  THE  EXPERIMENTS   SERIES   IV.    AND   V. 

In  Series  IV.  the  apparatus  was  arranged  as  shown  in  fig.  8,  p.  75,  the  object 
being  to  measure  the  Joule-Thomson  effect,  i.e.,  the  change  of  temperature  0,-04 
(fig.  7),  corresponding  to  a  change  of  pressure  from  p,  to  the  pressure  on  the  limit 
curve  p,.  Iii  the  actual  tests  the  pressure  could  not  be  allowed  to  fall  quite  down  to 
the  limit  curve  for  fear  of  introducing  errors  due  to  the  commencement  of  evaporation. 
To  get  the  total  03-64,  the  observed  difference  of  temperature  was  increased  in  the 
proportion  of  the  observed  drop  to  the  total  drop  of  pressure.  In  fig.  8  the  pressure 
drop  is  measured  by  the  gauges  a  and  b  and  the  temperature  change  by  the  thermo- 
juuctions  A  and  B.  The  liquid  C0a  from  the  weighing  flask  first  passes  through  the 
inner  coil  of  the  calorimeter  and  is  there  cooled  to  any  desired  temperature.  It  then 
flows  in  order  past  :  — 

Gauge  a  and  thermo-junction  A. 

Throttle  valve  Vj. 

Thermo-junction  B  and  gauge  b. 

Throttle  valve  Vr 

Outer  coil  in  the  calorimeter  and  gauge  c. 

The  C0a  is  liquid  up  to  the  second  valve,  Vj. 

The  pressure  of  the  liquid  up  to  the  valve  Vt  is  pv  The  valve  Vt  is  adjusted  so  as 
to  allow  it  to  drop  to  a  pressure  pt  a  few  pounds  above  p2. 

The  valve  V,  is  adjusted  so  as  to  allow  it  to  drop  from  px  to  p2,  which  is  the 
saturation  pressure  corresponding  to  the  temperature  of  the  liquid.  The  difference 
of  temperature  0A—  9B  between  A  and  B  is  the  Joule-Thomson  effect  corresponding  to 
the  drop  of  pressure  Pi—p^  Therefore 


In  the  first  series  of  experiments  the  valve  Vt  was  a  large  bronze  hydraulic  valve, 
and  the  thenno-junctions  were  inserted  in  the  gunmetal  fittings  shown  in  fig.  15, 
which  were  connected  to  the  valve  by  pipes  about  6  inches  long.  The  whole 
apparatus  was  well  lagged,  but  the  amount  of  heat  which  leaked  in  when  the 
temperature  was  low  was  sufficient  to  raise  the  temperature  of  the  C02  to  an  extent 
which  was  large  compared  with  the  small  temperature  change  which  had  to  be 
determined  ;  this  leakage  was  allowed  for  by  observing  the  temperature  change  due 
to  the  leakage  only,  when  the  valve  V,  was  full  open,  and  subtracting  this  from  the 
temperature  change  when  V,  was  throttled,  the  rate  of  flow  being  kept  the  same  in 
the  two  experiments.  Conduction  along  the  pipe  between  A  and  B  has  no  effect. 
Each  observation  was  repeated  a  number  of  times  and  the  means  taken.  It  was  not 


TIIHIiMAL   I'ROl'KIJTIKs   (i|    CAIHIONIC  ACID   AT   LOW   TEMPERATURES.          91 


found  possible  to  make  observations  at  temperatures  below  —30°  C.,  and  even  at  this 
temperature  the  results  were  open  to  criticism  as  being  small  differences  between 
large  measurements,  see  Table  V.  (first  part). 

To  get  reliable  results  it  was  therefore  necessary  to  design  a  special  apparatus, 
combining  two  thenin  ^junctions  and  a  throttle,  which  should  not  allow  of  appreciable 
radiation.  Experience  with  the  original  apparatus  showed  that  the  throttle  had  to 
be  adjustable  to  enable  the  required  pressure  ranges  to  1*3  obtained.  After  one  or 
two  experiments  the  apparatus  shown  in  fig.  16  was  made  and  answered  perfectly. 


H.  Steel  tube. 

K.  Ebonite  tube. 

L. 

M.  Copper  jauze  plug. 

N.  Inlet. 

Outlet. 

Iron  yoke. 

Vulcanite  block  for 
control  expc.s. 


Ebonite  valve  body. 

Packing. 

Brass  gland. 

vaJve  spindle. 
"      valve. 

Ebonite  distance  piece 
Brass  cap. 


Fig.  16. 

The  body  of  the  valve  is  vulcanite,  the  gland  and  screw  are  brass,  but  the  screw  is 
insulated  from  the  passage  through  the  valve  by  an  extension  rod  of  vulcanite.  A 
minute  brass  valve  is  inserted  under  the  extension  rod,  and  is  the  only  metal 
encountered  by  the  CO.,  in  passing  through  the  valve.  The  two  thermo-junctions  are 
held  in  vulcanite  plugs  inserted  in  the  steel  tubes  on  either  side  of  the  valve.  They 
project  inside  the  inner  vulcanite  tubes,  shown  in  the  figure.  The  outer  space  forms 
a  jacket  of  CO3  at  approximately  the  same  temperature  as  the  inner  space — which  is 
entirely  protected  by  the  vulcanite  tubes  from  any  external  influence.  Vulcanite  is 
one  of  the  best  thermal  insulators — the  specific  conductivity  is  given  by  KAYE  and 
LABY  as  '00042.  The  whole  apparatus  is  held  together  by  an  iron  yoke,  and  can  be 
taken  to  pieces  in  a  moment  by  slackening  one  of  the  set  screws  at  the  end.  The 

N  2 


,.|;<)F.  f.   FKKWEX  JENKIN  AND  MB.   D.  R.   PYE  ON  THE 


,;„„.  j,,i,,te  between  the  steel  tubes  and  the  vulcanite  pieces  were  perfectly  tight 
UII1|,.r  tl..<  maximum  pressure  used,  900  Ibs.  per  sq.  in.  The  bore  of  the  valve  ,s 
,',  in,-!,  diameter  and  the  passages  are  t)ell-mouthed  oa  both  sides.  A  plug  formed 
of  rolled  copper  gauze  serves  to  dissipate  the  kinetic  energy  of  the  jet  issuing  from 
the  valve.  The  time  occupied  in  the  passage  from  one  thermo-junction  to  the  other, 
at  the  slowest  rate  of  flow,  was  only  a  fraction  of  a  second. 

The  thermo-junctions  were  connected  to  the  selector  switch  (p.  85)  in  such  a  way 
that  the  temperature  of  either  junction,  or  the  difference  between  the  two,  could  be 
measured.  The  latter  arrangement  was  convenient,  since  it  was  the  difference  of 
temperature  which  was  being  investigated. 

Before  using  the  new  apparatus  tests  were  made  to  ascertain  whether  the  heat 
insulation  was  in  fact  perfect,  and  also  what  difference,  if  any,  there  was  between  the 
readings  of  temperature  given  by  the  two  thermo-junctions.  The  construction  of  the 
apparatus  makes  these  tests  very  simple. 

To  avoid  the  slightest  drop  of  pressure  between  the  thermo-junctions,  a  simple  full- 
bore  block  of  vulcanite  (also  shown  in  fig.  16)  was  substituted  for  the  adjustable  valve, 
then  liquid  COj  was  passed  through  the  apparatus,  first  with  the  thermo-junctions  in 
their  normal  positions,  and  again  when  the  thermo-junctions  had  been  interchanged, 
end  for  end.  The  apparent  difference  of  temperature  between  the  thermo-junctions 
in  the  first  case  represents  the  sum,  and  in  the  second  case,  the  difference,  of  the  two 
quantities  to  be  determined,  viz.,  the  actual  change  of  temperature  of  the  liquid  and 
the  difference  of  the  thermo-junctions. 

Experiments  were  made  with  liquid  C0a  at  temperatures  ranging  from  +  20°  C.  to 
—  50°  C.  They  showed  that  there  was  no  change  in  the  temperature  of  the  liquid, 
but  that  there  was  a  very  slight  difference  between  the  thermo-junctions.  This  was 
allowed  for  in  subsequent  measurements.*  As  a  further  check,  similar  tests  were 
made  with  wet  CO,  vapour  instead  of  liquid  C02.  The  difference  between  the 
readings  of  the  thermo-junctious  was  confirmed.  There  could  be  no  difference  of 
temperature  of  the  vapour  in  this  case,  since  the  pressure  was  the  same  at  the  two 
junctions. 

As  the  calorimeter  could  not  be  cooled  much  below  —40°  C.,  and  readings  were 
wanted  at  —50°  C.,  an  "  infra-cooler"  was  inserted  in  the  pipe  between  the  calori- 
meter and  the  throttle  valve,  by  which  the  liquid  could  be  cooled  to  any  extent 
desired.  By  this  means  readings  were  obtained  down  to  -55°  C.  The  "  infra-cooler  " 
consisted  of  two  concentric  copper  pipes  10  feet  long,  the  inner  one  £  inch  external 
diimu-ter,  the  outer  one  f  inch  internal  diameter.  The  liquid  C02  passed  through  the 
inner  tube,  while  a  separate  supply  of  liquid  C02  was  admitted  to  the  outer  tube  and 
evaporated  at  a  pressure  of  about  80  Ibs.  per  sq.  in.,  escaping  through  a  throttle  valve 
ato  the  atmosphere.  The  concentric  pipes  were  bent  into  a  coil  about  9  inches 
diameter  and  well  lagged  with  cotton  wool  The  arrangement  worked  well,  though 

*  See  note  on  Table  V. 


THKliMAL  PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TKMPKKATURES. 


it  was  not  possible  to  keep  the  temperature  of  the  liquid  CO,  aljsolutely  constant 
dm  -ing  an  observation.  Slight  variations  of  temperature  account  for  the  irregularities 
of  the  observations  below  —30°  C.  ;  above  that  temperature  the  "  infra-cooler"  was 
not  used.  The  results  of  the  tests  with  the  original  and  with  the  new  apparatus  are 
summarised  in  Table  V.,  and  both  are  plotted  in  fig.  9,  p.  76.  The  two  sets  of  results 
are  in  good  agreement,  considering  tin-  smnllness  of  the  quantities  being  measured. 

Scries    V.  —  The  apparatus   used   for   measuring   the   elasticity  and  dilatation  of 
liijiiid  C()a  is  shown  in  figs.  10  and  17  :  — 

a  is  a  capillary  glass  tube,  the  lower  end  of  which  is  closed  and  the  upper  end 
thickened  and  blown  into  a  thistle  funnel.  A  centimetre  scale  was  etched  along  its 
whole  length,  and  it  was  carefully  calibrated  by  measuring  the 
variation  in  the  length  of  a  thread  of  mercury  in  different 
positions. 

It  is  a  gunmetal  socket,  shown  in  detail  in  fig.  17,  turned  to 
hold  the  glass  tube,  the  joint  being  made  by  a  thin  rubber 
sleeve.  The  top  of  the  socket  is  closed  by  a  screw  plug. 

c  is  a  fine  copper  pipe,  J-inch  bore,  12  feet  long,  connecting 
the  socket  to  the  regulating  valves,  pressure  gauge,  and,  through 
a  drying  flask,  to  the  CO.,  flask.  This  pipe  is  sufficiently 
flexible  to  allow  the  glass  tube  to  be  moved  about  as  required 
while  under  pressure. 

The  glass  tul>e  was  charged  as  follows  :  —  The  tube  was  laid 
in  a  nearly  horizontal  position  and  a  small  quantity  .of  mercury 
poured  into  the  thistle  funnel,  where  it  lay  without  obstructing 
the  entrance  to  the  tube.  The  plug  was  then  inserted  in  the 
gunmetal  head.  The  air  was  removed  by  means  of  an  air  pump, 
successive  charges  of  CO3  gas  being  admitted  and  exhausted. 
The  lower  half  of  the  glass  tube  was  then  surrounded  with  ice, 
and  COj,  gas  was  admitted  up  to  a  pressure  slightly  above  the 
saturation  pressure  at  0°  C.  The  gas  then  condensed  in  the 
glass  tube,  and  the  meniscus  could  be  seen  travelling  up  the  tube.  The  rate  of 
condensation  could  be  regulated  with  ease  by  modifying  the  pressure.  When 
sufficient  liquid  was  condensed,  the  tube  was  raised  into  a  vertical  position  so  that 
the  mercury  in  the  funnel  flowed  into  it,  on  to  the  top  of  the  liquid  CO^.  The  tube, 
kept  vertical,  was  then  lowered  into  the  calorimeter,  the  temperature  of  which  had 
been  adjusted  to  a  few  degrees  below  0°  C.  The  amount  of  liquid  used  and  the 
length  of  the  mercury  column  were  chosen  so  that  the  whole  of  the  liquid  CO.,  was 
below  the  level  of  the  bath  in  the  calorimeter,  and  therefore  at  a  uniform  tempera- 
ture, and  the  top  of  the  mercury  showed  above  the  lid  of  the  calorimeter,  so  that 
its  position  could  be  observed  with  a  cathetometer. 


17 


94  |.,J,,F.   f.    FKKtt'EN  JENKIN   AND   MR.  D.  R.   PYE  ON   THE 

\Vl.rn  making  an  .-xprriment,  the  bath  was  first  cooled  to  the  desired  temperature. 
Thru  rra.lings  were  taken  with  the  cathetometer  as  the  pressure  was  varied  step  by 
>t, •).  IP.III  tlir  iiiaxinniin  available  to  a  pressure  just  above  the  saturation  pressure 
corresponding  to  the  temperature  of  the  bath.  These  readings  give  a  constaut- 
temperature  curve  on  the  p.v.  diagram.  A  series  of  experiments  was  made  with 
different  temperatures,  so  that  a  number  of  constant-temperature  curves  were 
obtained,  as  shown  in  fig.  11,  p.  78. 

The  apparatus  appeared  to  work  satisfactorily,  but  the  results  obtained  are  not  in 
perfect  agreement  amongst  themselves  ;  the  cause  of  this  has  not  yet  been  ascertained. 
The  curves  shown  in  fig.  1 1  have  been  arbitrarily  constructed  to  represent  the  mean 
results  of  several  sets  of  observations  and  to  agree  amongst  themselves  ;  they  must  be 
taken  as  only  approximate,  but  they  are  sufficiently  accurate  to  determine  the  small 
correction  3,  Table  VI.,  for  which  they  are  required.  AMAGAT'S  (5)  curves  have  been 
added  to  fig.  1 1  for  comparison. 

By  extrapolation  the  curves  may  be  extended  to  the  left  to  the  saturation  pressure, 
which  is  only  just  below  the  lowest  pressure  observed.  This  has  been  done  in  fig.  11. 
By  joining  up  the  ends  of  all  the  curves,  the  new  curve  (named  "limit  curve"  in  the 
figure)  is  obtained  which  shows  the  change  of  volume  along  the  limit  curve.  A  curve 
giving  BEHN's(6)  observations  is  also  drawn  for  comparison.  The  agreement  is  fairly 
good. 

It  is  not  necessary  to  describe  the  lengthy  and  rather  complex  calculations  required 
to  reduce  the  data  obtained  in  these  experiments.  Allowance  was  made  for  the 
changes  of  volume  of  the  glass  and  of  the  mercury  indicator  at  different  temperatures, 
and  corrections  applied  to  allow  for  the  variation  in  the  bore  of  the  tube.  All  these 
corrections  are  small  compared  with  the  changes  of  volume  of  the  C02  due  to 
temperature.  Since  the  actual  weight  of  the  column  of  liquid  CO3  was  not  measured, 
the  density  at  some  one  temperature  had  to  be  assumed ;  BEHN'S  value,  viz.,  0'925 
at  0°  C.,  was  used. 

The  elasticity  and  dilatation  may  be  derived  from  the  curves  directly.  The 
elasticity  (dv/dp)t  is  the  slope  of  the  constant  temperature  lines.  The  dilatation 
(dv/dt),  is  the  distance  apart  of  the  constant  temperature  lines  divided  by  the 
difference  of  temperature. 

These  quantities  have  not  been  worked  out  because  of  the  known  inaccuracy  of  the 
observations.  The  authors  intend  to  repeat  the  experiments  and  hope  to  obtain 
accurate  results. 

PART  IV. — DISCUSSION  OF  RESULTS. 
Pressure-Temperature  Cuwe.     (Fig.  18.     Tables  I.  and  X.) 

Tl,«  n-lation  between  the  pressure  and  temperature  of  saturated  CO2  vapour  has 
by  RKUNAULT  (7),  CAILLSTET  (8),  AMAGAT  (5),  KUENEN  and  KOBSON  (9), 


THERMAL   PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES. 


95 


ZKLENY  and  SMITH  (10),  and  others.     The   observations  are  tabulated  in  parallel 
columns  in  Table  X.  and  all  plotted  in  fig.  18  besides  the  authors'  curve. 

The  most  accurate  determinations  are  probably  KUENEN  and  ROBSON'S  below  zero 
and  AMAGAT'S  above  zero.     Our  curve  agrees  closely  with  KUENEN  and  ROBSON'S, 


900 


-  :,, 


700 


600  -too 


500 


400 


306 


200 


10(1        Id 


> 


1C 


LATENT  HEAT 


-T CURVE  USED  BY  MOLLIER 


.  THE  AU1 


PRESSURE-  TEMPERATURE 


HORS'  P-T  CUXVE 


KUENEN  AND  ROBSON • 

ZELENY  AND  SMITH          ---o 

CAILLETCT - X 

-REGNAULT-  •-  --+• 

AMAGAT A 

CAILLETET  AND  MATH/AS  -  •» 

MATH/AS -J 

MOLLIER --e 

CHAPPUIS 


-60 


-50 


-40 


-30 


-20  -10 

Fig.  18. 


\ 


DEGREES     CENTIGRADE 


10 


20 


30 


only  differing  by  3  Ibs.  at  510  Ibs.  pressure.  It  also  agrees  fairly  closely  with 
AMAGAT'S,  differing  by  G  Ibs.  at  830  Ibs.  Both  these  differences  are  almost  exactly 
equal  to  the  calculated  effects  of  the  presence  of  the  observed  '11  per  cent,  of  air  (by 
volume)  under  the  special  conditions  of  our  test. 


96 


PROF.  C.  FRKWEX  JENKIN  AND  MR.   D.   R.   PYE  ON  THE 


an,l  SMITH'S  points  lie  Hose  to  our  OW?e,  bat  i  <-iir\r  tlm.ii^li  tli.'ir  points 
would  be  definitely  flatter  than  ours.  There  is  a  difference  of  10  Ibs.  at  their  highest 
pivssmv,  410  Ibs. 

CAILLETET'S  figures  only  go  up  to  -34°  C.  They  do  not  agree  very  closely  in 
position  or  slope. 

KEONAULT'S  figures  lie  well  above  the  others.  He  states  that  his  experiments  did 
not  satisfy  him. 

MOLLIER  adopted  a  composite  curve,  using  AMAGAT'S  figures  above  zero  and 
REGNAULT'S  below  zero,  modified  so  as  to  make  them  fit  together.  His  curve  is 
shown  dotted  in  fig.  18. 

An  accurate  determination  of  the  pressure-temperature  curve  is  important  because 
its  gradient,  dp/dS,  is  one  of  the  factors  in  CLAPEYRON'S  equation,  which  may  be  used 
to  calculate  the  latent  heat  or  the  vapour  density. 

The  gradient  of  MOLLIER'S  curve  is  clearly  too  small,  particularly  at  low  tempe- 
ratures. It  is  remarkable  how  large  a  difference  in  the  gradient  results  from  a  very 
small  divergence  between  the  curves.  The  values  of  dp/dd,  used  by  CAILLETET  and 
MATHIAS(H),  MOLLIER,  and  KUENEN  and  KOBSON  for  calculating  L,  and  by  the 
authors  who  only  used  it  for  calculating  the  specific  volume  of  the  gas,  are  given 
below : — 

VALUES  of  dp/d9. 


T. 

C.  anclM.  (11). 

MOLLIER  (1). 

-K.  and  R.  (9). 

Authors. 

°c. 
+  20 

lbi./in.5  °  C. 
20-4 

Ibs./in.2  °  C. 
19-4 

Ibs./in.2  °  C. 

lbs./in.2  °  C. 
19-6 

+  10 

17-18 

16-6 

_, 

16-3 

0 

14-12 

13-18 

13-46 

13-6 

-10 

11-32 

10-69 

11-01 

11-1 

-20 

8-84 

8-55 

8-73 

8-9 

-30 

— 

6-79 

6-87 

7-0 

-40 

— 

— 

5-37 

5-3 

-50 

" 

4-06 

4-0 

The  Total  Heat  I  and  Specific  Heat  Cp  of  the  Liquid. 

Our  observations  were  plotted  and  values  read  from  the  smooth  curve  are  given  in 
No  experimental  determinations  of  these  quantities  appear  to  have  been 
Flgures  for  comparison  might  be  deduced  from  MOLLIER'S  (3)  U  diagram 
this  is  beyond  the  range  of  this  paper. 

The  probable  errors  in  the  values  of  I  do  not  exceed  about  £  per  cent.,  from  +20°  C 
a,  but  rise  to  1  per  cent,  at  -50°  C.     The  presence  of  '073  per  cent,  of  air 
has  no  appreciable  effect  on  the  results. 

Experiments  have  been  made  by  DIETERICI  (15)  and  by  MARGULES  (16)  on  the 


TIII.KMAL   PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.         97 

difli'ivnces  between  the  total  heats  at  O8  C.  and  at  a  few  other  temperatures.  These 
quantities  refer  to  heating  along  the  limit  curve  and  not  to  heating  at  constant 
pressure. 

Specific  Heat  of  the  Gas.     (Fig.  6.) 

No  experimental  determinations  of  this  quantity  appear  to  have  been  made  at 
temperatures  below  0°  C.,  though  much  work  has  been  done  at  high  temperatures. 

The  specific  heat  is  believed  to  vary  considerably  near  the  limit  curve.  Our 
measurements  give  a  mean  value  for  a  moderate  range  of  temperature,  starting  in 
each  case  a  few  degrees  above  the  limit  curve ;  they  are  probably  not  correct  for 
higher  temperatures  than  those  at  which  they  were  measured.  They  are  only  used 
for  the  small  correction  given  in  column  y,  Table  VI.,  and  for  plotting  the  pressure 
lines  in  the  superheated  area. 

Latent  Heat  of  Liquid  CO.,. 

Our  ol>servations  were  plotted  and  values  read  off  the  smooth  curve  are  given  in 
Table  VI.  The  figures  are  probably  correct  to  about  £  per  cent,  from  +20°  C.  to 
—  30°  C.  and  to  1  per  cent,  at  —50°  C.  One  point,  at  —8° '6  C.  lies  1  per  cent,  off 
the  curve.  This  was  the  result  of  the  first  experiment  made,  when  the  spring 
I  >a  lances  were  still  used  for  weighing  the  CO.).  The  trace  of  air  present  only 
produces  a  proportionate  error  in  the  value  of  L,  i.e.,  '073  per  cent.,  which  is 
negligible. 

No  experimental  determinations  of  L  below  zero  have  been  published.  REGNAULT* 
made  a  single  determination  at  +17°  C. ;  CHAPPUIS  (13)  a  single  determination  at 
0°  C.  and  MATHlAs(l2)  made  a  series  of  measurements  between  +6°  C.  and  +31°  C. 
CAILLETET  and  MATHIAS  (ll)  calculated  L  from  their  own  determination  of  the 
liquid  and  vapour  densities  and  REGNAULT'S  pressure-temperature  curve.  KUENEN 
and  ROUSON  (9)  calculated  L  from  AMAGAT'S  (5)  vapour  density  (extrapolated)  and 
BERN'S  (o)  liquid  densities  and  their  own  pressure-temperature  curve.  MOLLJER(I) 
calculated  L  from  AMAGAT'S  (5)  vapour  and  liquid  densities  (extrapolated)  and  the 
compound  pressure-temperature  curve  mentioned  above,  based  on  AMAGAT  and 
REGNAULT'S  results. 

All  these  results  are  plotted  in  fig.  18  beside  our  curve.  If  the  drawing  is  examined 
it  will  be  seen  that  the  mean  of  all  the  previous  determinations  lies  above  our  curve. 
We  have  investigated  the  causes  of  this  divergence  in  detail  as  it  appeared  to  cast 
some  doubt  on  the  accuracy  of  our  results.  The  investigation  has  shown,  first  why 
the  previous  results  tend  to  agree  amongst  themselves,  secondly  why  they  differ  from 
ours,  and,  finally,  has  resulted  in  an  indirect  confirmation  of  our  results. 

*  Recalculated  by  MATHIAS  (12). 
VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  O 


yg  ,.,;,„.-.  ,     H;I;\\I:N  .IKNKIN  AND  MR  D.  R.  PYE  ON  TJII-: 

Tli,-     HI-    <>('  tin-  n.u^l,  a-rniement  among  the  observations  is  that  the  sain.-  data 
|*en  n'1-.-.t.-.lly  "s.-.l.     Thus  CAILLETET  and  MATHIAS'  densities  were  used  by— 

MATHIAS         |  .^  work-      ollt  tjiejr  observations, 
CHAPPUIS       J 

CAILLKTKT  .  ,  ,. 

>•  in  their  calculations. 
and  MATHIABJ 

AMAUAT'R  densities  were  used  by  — 

KUENEN  and  ROBSON  j  ^  ^  calculations. 

MOLLIEB  J 

REONAULT'S  pressure-temperature  curve  was  used  by— 

CAILLETET  and  MATHIAS  "1    .         .       ,    ,    . 

>  m  their  calculations. 
MOLLIER  (in  part)  J 

The  difference  between  the  various  results  and  ours  may  be  traced  to  the  inaccuracy 
of  REGNAULT'S  (and  consequently  MOLLIER'S)  pressure-temperature  curve  and  to  the 
error  in  CAILLETET  and  MATHIAS'  gas  densities  below  —20°  C,  and  to  the  uncertainty 
of  the  extrapolated  values  of  the  densities  used  by  MOLLIEB  and  KUENEN  and 
ROBSON. 

All  the  calculated  values  of  L  were  obtained  by  means  of  CLAPEYRON'S  equation 


where 

V  =  specific  volume  of  saturated  vapour, 

v  =       „  „  liquid  at  saturation  temperature. 

Their  accuracy  therefore  depends  on  the  accuracy  of  the  two  factors  dp/dd  and 

(v-v). 

The  differences  in  the  pressure-temperature  curves  and  their  gradients  have  already 
been  discussed,  so  that  it  is  only  necessary  to  consider  now  the  other  factor  (V—v). 
The  specific  volume  of  the  liquid  v  is  much  smaller  than  of  the  vapour,  and  the  values 
obtained  by  different  observers  do  not  differ  much  ;  it  is,  therefore,  not  necessary  to 
discuss  it  here.  The  specific  volume  of  the  saturated  vapour,  V,  is  much  more 
doubtful.  In  fig.  19  are  plotted  — 

(1)  AMAUAT's(5)  smooth  curve  from  his  observations  of  V. 

(2)  CAILLETET  and  MATHIAS'  (ll)  smooth  curve  from  their  observations  of  V. 

(3)  KUENEN  and  RoBSON's(9)  extrapolation  (by  the  Law  of  Corresponding  states) 
of  AMAOAT'S  curve. 

(4)  MOLLIER'S  (1)  extrapolation  of  AMAGAT'S  curve. 

(5)  Our  values,  calculated  from  our  observed  values  of  L  by  CLAPEYRON'S  equation, 
using  BERN'S  (6)  liquid  densities. 

Values  taken  from  our  smooth  curve  are  given  in  Table  IX. 


TIIKKMAI.    I'linl'KKTIKS    o|     CAIM'.ONIC    ACID    AT    LOW   TKM  I'M;  V  I  I  1:1  S.          <i;i 


\  » 

\  \ 
\  \ 
\  I 
\  \ 
\  V 
\  1 
\  \ 

50 
45 
40 
35 
30 
25 
20 
15 
10 

3 

\\ 

\  \ 
\  \ 
\  \ 
\\ 
\\ 
\\ 
\\ 

SPECIFIC 

VOLUME  OF 

SATURATED 
1 

VAPOUR 

DE 

VS/TY 

\ 

\ 

^^ 

M 

\ 

V 

Y          CALCULAl 
\C  AUTHORS,' 

\ 

c  or/ton  THI 

OBSCKVATIOHS 

i 

\ 
LI 

1 

EXTRAPOLATION 

BY  KUCNCHAMD 

10BSON 

\ 

EXTRAPOLATH 

NBYHOLLICR 

\^ 

-CAILLETCT  A*o 

L 
WMUSJI^m 

OBSIWATIO 

MS                ^^\. 

^ 

f  LIMIT  Of  AHA. 

'•AT'S  OBSCRVAT, 

o/vs. 

^ 

AH, 

^^          oasta 

^<J 

IGAT-S 
VAT  IONS 

TCHP-  "C 

^ 

CAM 

^^ 

0                 -40                  -3O                 -20                  -10                     0                      10                    20                    30 
Fig-  19- 
0  2 

100  PROF.  C.   H;i:\vi:X  JKNKIN  AND  MB.   P.   R.   PYE  ON  THE 

Tin-  ..Iflervations  on  which  CAILLETKT  and  MATHIAS'  smooth  curve  is  founded  lie 
erratically  and  at  considerable  distances  from  the  curve.     The  curve  is  clearly 

rrn •Hi-nils  below  —20°  C. 

It  will  be  noted  that  our  values  agree  very  closely  with  CAILLETET  and  MATHIAS' 
from  -20°  C.  to  + 10"  C.  Our  curve  also  lies  almost  exactly  parallel  with  AMAGAT'S 
curve  and  KUENEN  and  ROBSON'S  theoretical  extension  of  it.  The  agreement  between 
our  curve,  the  observations,  and  the  theoretical  curve  is  a  confirmation  of  the  accuracy 
of  the  shape  of  our  L  curve. 

The  inaccuracy  of  our  pressure-temperature  curve,  due  to  the  presence  of  '11  per 
cent,  of  air,  referred  to  on  p.  69,  introduces  an  error  into  our  values  ofd  p/dO  which 
probably  does  not  exceed  2  per  cent.  If  this  were  allowed  for,  it  would  raise  our 
specific- volume  curve  by  2  per  cent.,  and  bring  it  closer  to  KUENEN  and  ROBSON'S. 
Tin-  value  of  V  does  not  enter  into  the  construction  of  our  00  diagram. 

Joule-Thomson  Effect.     (Fig.  9.) 

No  experiments  on  the  Joule-Thomson  effect  for  liquid  C02  appear  to  have  been 
published.  Figures  for  comparison  might  be  deduced  from  MOLLIER'S  I<f>  diagram  (3), 
but  that  would  be  beyond  the  range  of  this  paper.  It  is  not  easy  to  say  what  effect 
the  presence  of  the  trace  of  air  may  have  on  these  results. 

Dilatation  and  Elasticity  of  liquid  C02. 

As  has  been  explained,  the  results  of  the  Series  V.  experiments  were  not  sufficiently 
concordant  to  warrant  the  publication  of  values  of  the  dilatation  and  elasticity 
derived  from  them,  though  they  are  accurate  enough  to  determine  the  values  of  $<f> 
between  the  constant-pressure  curves  and  the  limit  curve  on  the  6<f>  diagram.  The 
confirmation  of  BEHN'S  densities,  shown  in  fig.  11,  must  not  have  much  weight 
attached  to  it  for  the  same  reason. 

The  only  results  previously  published  are  a  single  curve  at  13°'l  C.,  given  by 
ANDREWS (14),  and  three  curves  given  by  AMAGAT(5)  at  0°  C.  +10°  C.,  and  +20°  C. 
We  have  failed  to  fit  ANDREWS'  curve  on  our  figure,  but  AMAGAT'S  curves  are  shown 
for  comparison  in  fig.  11.  ANDREWS  suggests  that  the  curvature  of  the  lines  near 
the  saturation  pressure  may  be  due  to  the  presence  of  air. 

0$  Diagram.     (Fig.  12.) 

As  stated  at  the  beginning  of  this  paper,  the  primary  object,  for  which  all  the 
quantities  already  discussed  were  measured,  was  the  construction  of  a  00  diagram  for 
comparison  with  MOLLIER'S. 

It  may  be  useful  to  recapitulate  here  the  steps  in  the  construction  of  the  two 
diagrams.  Fig.  12  was  drawn  as  follows  :— 


TIIKKMAL  PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.       101 

The  starting  points  of  the  700-lh.  and  900-lb.  constant-pressure  curves  (0  =  273°  C., 
^  =  —'0024  and  —'0049),  found  on  p.  80,  were  first  marked,  and  the  two  constant- 
pressure  curves  were  then  drawn  in  segments  of  10  degrees  each. 

The  liquid-limit  curve  was  then  set  off  from  these  pressure  curves  at  the  distances 
fy  given  in  Table  VIII. 

The  gas-limit  curve  was  then  set  off  from  the  liquid-limit  curve  at  the  distances 
fy  =  L/tf  (Table  VI). 

A  constant  I  line  was  then  drawn  through  the  origin,  at  a  slope  determined  by  the 
Joule-Thomson  effect.  Thus  the  value  of  I  at  the  origin  (calculated  on  p.  80) 
was  transferred  to  the  two  constant-pressure  curves.  The  points  1  =  0,  +5,  +10, 
+  15,  and  —  5,  —10,  —15,  —20,  —25  were  then  marked  on  these  curves  and  trans- 
ferred back  to  the  limit  curve  by  drawing  I  lines  as  before.  Thus  the  starting  points 
of  the  I  lines  on  the  limit  curve  were  determined.  Measuring  from  these,  a  number 
of  points  were  then  marked  off  at  distances  $<f>  =  5/6,  10/6,  15/6,  &c.,  and  I  lines 
drawn  through  these  points.  The  space  between  the  limit  curves  was  then  divided 
into  quarters,  thus  determining  a  few  dryness  lines.  The  constant-pressure  curves  in 
the  superheated  area  were  then  drawn,  starting  at  the  corresponding  saturation 
temperatures  at  slopes 

= 


where  the  values  of  Ql—  6a  were  the  actual  temperature  ranges  in  the  experiments, 
Series  III.,  and  a-  was  the  corresponding  specific  heat  of  the  gas  at  constant  pressure, 
given  in  fig.  6. 

The  maximum  probable  error  in  the  liquid  limit  curve  is  <ty>  =  '0008  at  —30°  C. 
and  '0032  at  —50°  0.  At  higher  temperatures  the  error  is  probably  not  more  than 
'0005. 

MOLLIER'S  ti<f>  diagram  was  constructed  in  a  very  different  manner.  He  assumed 
that  the  characteristic  equation  of  the  gas  might  l>e  expressed  in  VAN  DER  WAAL'S 
form 

K0 

V-a.      ( 

and  determined  the  constants  by  means  of  AMAOAT'S  observations.     He  also  assumed 

li-—} 

that  f(6)  was  of  the  form  f(6)  =  e*    '•',  and  by  means  of  these  equations  obtained  a 

general  expression  for  the  entropy  of  the  gas,  which  would  hold  down  to  the  limit 
curve.  With  this  he  plotted  the  gas  limit  curve  on  the  6<f>  diagram. 

He  then  found  an  empirical  mathematical  formula  for  the  slope  of  the  pressure- 
temperature  curve,  dp/d6,  which,  on  integration,  corresponded  well  with  the  pressure- 
temperature  curve  constructed  from  AMAGAT'S  and  REGNAULT'S  observations.  With 
this  and  AMAGAT'S  values  for  the  vapour  and  liquid  densities  (extrapolated)  he 
calculated  the  values  of  L,  and  set  off  the  liquid  limit  curve  to  the  left  of  the  gas  limit 
curve  at  distances  $<f>  =  L/0. 


102  PROF.  c.  n.i:\\i  N  U:XKI.\  AND  MR.  P.  R.  PYE  ON  THE 

To  construct  the  constant-pressure  lines  in  the  superheated  area  he  assumed  (2) 
that  the  specific  heat  at  constant  volume,  Cw  was  constant,  which  he  points  out  is 
not  ,,.iit,-  tin,-.  ( )n  this  assumption  the  constant- volume  lines  on  the  6<f>  diagram  are 
the  same  as  those  for  a  perfect  gas  (logarithmic  curves).  The  constant-pressure 
curves  were  then  determined  from  these  constant-volume  curves  by  the  p.v.  6  curves 
observed  by  AMAUAT.  MOLLIER  does  not  draw  I  lines  on  his  Q$  diagram.  His 
values  of  I  are  given  in  his  10  diagram  (3),  which  is  outside  the  range  of  the  present 

discussion. 

The  agreement  between  the  two  diagrams,  constructed  by  such  widely  different 
methods,  is  remarkable,  the  more  so  because  MOLLIEH  had  no  data  to  go  on  below 
0"  C.,  except  REONAULT'S  very  imperfect  pressure-temperature  curve.  The  following 
brief  comparison  between  the  two  methods  shows  how  widely  they  differ. 

Our  diagram  is  based  in  the  most  direct  manner  possible  on  experiments  at  the 
temperatures  and  pressures  represented,  whereas  MOLLIER'S  is  based  on  a  mathe- 
matical equation  obtained  from  experiments  at  higher  temperatures.  Our  diagram 
is  constructed  from  the  left,  his  from  the  right  hand.  Our  diagram  is  based  on 
measurements  of  heat,  his  on  measurements  of  density  and  pressure. 

The  two  diagrams  are  superposed  in  fig.  13,  and  values  of  0  and  L  are  given  in 
Table  XVII.  for  comparison.  In  Table  XVIII.  our  data  are  arranged  for  direct 
comparison  with  the  tables  given  by  MOLLIER  (l)  and  EWING  (4). 

The  differences  between  the  diagrams  are  due  to  the  differences  in  the  various  data, 
which  have  been  already  discussed.  The  authors  take  this  opportunity  of  expressing 
their  great  admiration  for  the  judgment  and  skill  by  which  Dr.  MOLLIER  has  selected 
the  most  reliable  data  and  devised  mathematical  methods  capable  of  giving  results 
which  direct  experiments  have  confirmed  so  closely. 

SUMMARY. 

The  authors  have  reconstructed  the  d<j>  diagram  by  a  new  method  and,  at  the  same 
time,  extended  it  from  -30°  C.  to  -50°  C.  The  reconstruction  is  based  on  direct 
heat  measurements,  and  the  results  are  believed  to  be  more  accurate  than  those 
arrived  at  indirectly  by  MOLLIER. 

The  observations  include  the  direct  measurement  of  the  following  quantities  : — 

The  latent  heat ; 

The  total  heat  of  the  liquid  ; 

The  specific  heat  of  the  gas  ; 

The  dilatation  and  elasticity  of  the  liquid  ; 

The  Joule-Thomson  effect  for  the  liquid. 

From  these  direct  measurements  the  following  quantities  have  been  calculated : — 
The  specific  volume  of  the  saturated  vapour  ; 
The  specific  heat  of  the  liquid  at  constant  pressure. 


TMKKMAI.    l'l;o|'Kl;TIKS  OF  CARBONIC   ACID   AT   LOW  TEMPERATURES.        in:; 


Most,  "t'tlifsc  iiii'asiin'iiiriit^  an-  new  ;   the  details  of  what  has  IM-CII  dime  Ix-fure 
(in  p.  68  and  in  Part  IV.,  p.  '.»!. 

In  addition  to  the  ordinary  data  given  in  #•/>  diagrams  and  tables,  the  authors  have 
given  the  values  of  I,  so  that  a  complete  I<f>  diagram  might  be  constructed  from  the 
data  supplied  in  the  paper.  The  authors  have  made  this  diagram,  but  before 
publishing  it  they  intend  to  make  a  series  of  throttling  experiments  on  superheated 
gas  to  check  the  constant-pressure  curves,  which  have  so  far  only  Ixjen  approximately 
determined. 


P.S. — Since  this  paper  was  completed  the  authors  have  commenced  the  gas- 
throttling  experiments  referred  to  above.  These  may  be  used  as  an  independent 
check  on  the  accuracy  of  the  Q<f>  diagram,  ('housing  an  experiment  as  close  to  the 
gas-limit  curve  as  possible — to  avoid  possible  errors  in  the  approximate  constant- 
pressure  lines — the  confirmation  obtained  is  remarkably  good. 

Starting  at  the  point  "  V,"  tig.  12,  on  the  700-lbs.  pressure  line,  the  gas  was 
throttled  down  to  the  150-11)8.  pressure  line.  The  point  reached  is  marked  "  W." 
Calculated  from  the  6<j>  diagram,  the  point  W  should  have  fallen  exactly  on  the  limit 
curve;,  •/>.,  at  "  E."  If  the  limit  curve  be  moved  '0001  to  the  left,  W  and  E  will 
coincide.  A  shift  of  '0001  corresponds  to  an  error  of  '3  per  cent,  in  the  value  of  L. 
This  is  the  accumulated  error  in  the  whole  set  of  measurements  for  the  complete 
cycle  KAVWEGK  shown  in  fig.  20. 


Fig.  20. 

The  authors  desire  to  express  their  special  gratitude  to  Brasenose  College  for  the 
gift  of  the  freezing  machine  with  which  the  experiments  were  made.  They  also  have 
to  thank  Mr.  D.  H.  NAGEL,  of  Trinity  College,  and  Mr.  H.  B.  HARTLEY,  of  Balliol 
College,  for  advice  on  chemical  questions  and  for  having  generously  placed  the  College 
Libraries  at  their  disposal. 


104 


.  (     Fi;i:\Vi:\  JENKIN  AND  MR.   D.   R.   PYE  ON 


PAPKRS,  &c.,  REFERRED  TO. 
K-  Terence. 

(1)  MOI.LIKR,  'Zeit.  fur  die  ges.   Kalte-Industrie,'  1895,  Nos.   4  and  5,  pp.  66 

and  85. 

(2)  MOLLIER,  'Zeit.  fur  die  ges.  Kalte-Industrie,'  1896,  No.  4,  p.  65. 

(3)  MOLLIER,  'Zeit.  des  Vereines  Deutsch.  Ingenieure,'  1904. 

(4)  EWINO,  'Mech.  Production  of  Cold,'  1908. 

(5)  AMAGAT,  '  Annales  de  Chimie  et  de  Physique,'  6th  Ser.,  1893,  vol.  29,  p.  68. 

(6)  BEHN,   'Annalen  der   Physik,'   1900,  Ser.   IV.,  vol.   3,  p.  733.      Quoted  in 

ABEOO  and  AURBACH,  p.  154. 

(7)  REONAULT,  'M^m.  de  1'Acad.,'  vol.  26,  p.  335  (1862). 

(8)  CAILLETET,  'Arch,  de  Geneve,'  1878 (?),  quoted  by  ABEGG  and  AURBACH. 

(9)  KUENEN  and  ROBSON,  'Phil.  Mag.,'  Ser.  6,  vol.  III.,  p.  149  (1902)  and  p.  622. 

(10)  ZELENY  and  SMITH,  'Phys.  Zeit.,'  vol.  VII.,  p.  667  (1906). 

(11)  CAILLETET  and  MATHIAS,  '  Journ.  de  Phys.,'  Ser.  II.,  vol.  5,  1886,  p.  549. 

(12)  MATHIAS,  'Theses  &  la  Facultd  des  Sciences  de  Paris,'  No.  687  (1890). 

(13)  CHAPPUIS,  '  Comptes  Rendus,'  vol.  106,  p.  1007. 

(14)  ANDREWS,  'Phil.  Trans.,'  1869. 

(15)  DIETERICI,  'Annalen  der  Physik,'  1903,  vol.  12,  p.  154. 

(16)  MARGULES,  'Wieu.  Akad.  Sitzber.,'  1888,  vol.  XCVIL,  Abth.  2a,  p.  1385. 


TABLE  I. — Pressure-Temperature  Observations. 


Pressure. 

Temperature. 

Pressure. 

Temperature. 

lb..,in.5. 

°C. 

Ibs./inA 

°C. 

96 

-51-0 

354-5 

-13-0 

128 

-43-2 

387-5 

-    9-8 

167 

-35-8 

407 

8-15 

185 

-33-3 

429-5 

-    6-2 

206 
220-5 
243 
270 
295 
310 
316 
331 

-31-5 
-28-0 
-25-0 
-21-6 
-18-8 
-17-1 
-16-6 
-14-9 

474-5 
511 
514 
612 
711 
812 
898-5 

-    2-6 
+   0-2 
+   0-4 
+    7-15 
+  13-15 
+  18-8 
+  23-05 

TIIHRMAI,    I'UOI'KKTIKS  OF  CARBONIC   ACID  AT  LOW  TKMI'KRATURES.       105 


1 

~ 

to 

ep      ej» 

cj       S 

i 

oo 

^ 

I-H 

s*  <* 
7  1 

8 
8 

a 

i  - 

ce 

£      9 

04          — 

ci  a 

| 

o 

« 

• 

1 

w 

0) 

7  i 

IO 

1 

5P 

09 

•• 

5 

«      V 

S    2 

i-         IO 

/ 

•* 

o 

OS 
M 

i 

t-* 

cj 

"  * 

^H            00 

1 

7 

i 

oo 

op      cp 

<•     f5 

':•; 

e 

9 

CO 

99 

op 

00 

tO 

£  i 

5 

9 

T 

\ 

is 

*  S 

1— 

S  S 

7 

CD 

•— 

9 
>o 

7 

op      ^, 

w    2 

i 

9 
1 

i 

i 

9      ^ 

?.      • 

7*      f 

—       0 

+     1 

r 

eo 

i 

— 

A 

1 

•  1 

9 

1 

f 

1 

i 

s 

i  a 

?>     9 

10        CO 

1      1 

r 

* 
•M 

1 

•-H 

CO 

LO           S 
»-< 

o 

8 

f 

M 

1 

W 

CO 

8 

8    S 

'          o 

i    7 

e 

•* 
ex 

i 

o 

5     = 

3 

fi 

0) 

"f 

CM 

! 

R 

i 

8    « 

O         iH 
10         CO 

7  7 

r 

0 

eo 
M 

s 

H 

•r 
CO 

?»    3  ' 

\n         »rt 

o5      «-5 

« 
2 

.1 

i    ! 

8 
i 

i 

S 

8    S 

—      ?i 

i    i 

— 

i-t 

»-t 

1-4 
«-H 

W                    A 
- 

r* 

8 

L 

O 

9 

8 
1 

•- 

9 

S3 

co      m 

5     S 

-  s 
i    i 

9 

e 

f> 

m 

^^ 

i-H 

! 

CO        •* 

9 

S 

I-H 

a 

i 

i 

2 

<?      <p 

S    « 

N        <p 

8    S? 
l      i 

H 

r 

*• 

P4 

1 

8 

r,        ~ 

5    § 

a 

•E 

1 

o> 

1 

9 

— 

8 

S    2 

-            A 

09          J> 

"l              1 

g 

1 

M 

S 

CO 

IO 

1 

=    5 

10 

9 

« 

1 

Ip 

£ 

•— 

9 

10 

~i       r. 

Ss     2 

s   - 

1      1 

g 

r 

9 

i 

9 
— 

X         9 

B    H 

1 

H 

m 

1 

§ 

CO 

10        ^- 

S    2 

•-:        n 

S    8 
1     1 

i1 

e 

iH 

o 

o 
+ 

U 

9 

IO 

1 

I 

9 
o 

i  2 

V       T1 
2     2 

"l           ! 

P 

e 

-* 

§ 

0 

7 

a     •? 

S    $ 

" 

1 

a 

9 

»—  1 

SIP 
rt 

O       -< 
1         1 

P 

i 

CD 
M 

00 
IO 

00 

8 
i 

a  i 

9 

O 

= 

J 

.9     d 

=        ' 

R 

1 

C3 

-. 

s        = 

- 

1:1 

0          <U 

. 

.« 

tempera- 

*  '£  ' 

S.  -8.  ' 
M- 

tempera- 

• 

• 

. 

. 

!«"£ 

m 

R 

I 

Weight  of  CC 

O  .;;  qj* 
O^       . 

?«s 
III 

cS 

u!  : 

3   a- 

V 

Atmospheric 
tare  .  .  . 

Electric  heat 

i 

Radiation  . 
Total  heat 

Heat  per  Ib  . 

VOL.  CCX1II. — A. 


106 


,.|;<>F.   C    KKEWEN  JENKIN  AND  MR.   D.  R.   PYE  ON  THE 


rs 

I 


I 


IO 

at  -*t-oo  «  10 

—  t-  •*  e« 

CO 

t— 

ao  i~  -^  *~  t-  o  w 

^^  l-H                                         *^ 
1 

S'00g 

in 

t- 

O  »  00  t-  •-"  —• 

CO  tO  IO  -* 

rH 

00 

3S  O  «O  t~  <~  O  « 

—  55                 — 
i 

•*  (M  O  t- 

•-            co 

rH                    rH 

00 

O  •*  3S  OS  O  O 

OS   •*  t-  O 

0 

X  OS  -H  P5  «  O  <D 

^    -H  -«                               — 

1 

cc  o  e-i  CM 
m           <o 

—                  r-l 

OS 

o                    *^ 

r-l  CO  —  —  O  tf> 

eo  —  •  •*  oo 

CO 
OS 

00    d   r-*  t*  t*   O    ** 
rH  fH  r^                         -H 

1 

m   O  rH  tO 

O>               OS 

rH                    rH 

o 

r—  1 

«O  30  IN  IN  O  r-l 

in  rH  t-  rH 

m 

rH 

O    <O    rH    S-l    -M    O    '— 

(N  1—  1  O   <M 

rH                    rH 

T*" 

rH 

1                           1 

M     |          CM 

IO        t*- 

^J<  OS  C^  O  O  CO 

-*  0  0  -* 

rH 

tO  CO  rH   OS  OS  O  t— 

to  rH  o  *n 
o          o 

OS 

rH 

1           1 

CO     j           CO 

OS 
OS  CO  O  OS  -H  •"*" 

OS  00  OS  O 

00 

o  •«<•  m  oo  i-  o  m 

CM   S-l  t-l                            rH 
1                        1 

t-  C-l  <N  00 

co    I        co 

CO 

1—  1 

OS 

(M   tO   CO    <M   rH    O 

in  os  Tt<  oo 

OS 

rH 

O  o»  m  ao  oo  o  to 

?<  (M  CN                     -H 

t—  (M  CO  CO 

t-           oo 

«           co 

OS 

I—  » 

O  CO  t~tO  S  "* 

CM  m  co 

CO 

H>  t-  O  t~  t-  O  •* 

rH   CM   CO                            rH 
1                        1 

oo  eo  co  oo 

OS                OS 
CM     |           S-l 

rH 

<M 

CO   51  O   rH  1—  1  1—  1 

CM  tO  <M  O 

in 

t-  CM  lO   tO  t~  rH   CO 

rH   CO   CO                            —1 

1 

OS  to  ^  O 
l~  —         O 

co           •* 

CO 
CM 

« 

o  rH  co  m  oo  oo 

rH  O   CO   OS 

m 

t- 

CO  CO  OS  00  00  O  CO 
CO  CO                     — 

1 

t~  <M  •*  CO 

OS   I—  1             rH 
rH                      CM 

to 

CM 

S  <=O    • 

t3 

42 

==. 

£•§?  

s  • 

P' 
S 

Weight  of  CO,  .  .  . 
Duration  
Initial  temperature  . 
Final  temperature  .  . 
Mean  bath  temperature 
Fall  of  bath  temperature 
Atmospheric  temperature 

i 

.SjB* 

.gS-SJ 

€^1^ 

-  *^  « 
H««H 

.n 
1. 

49 

1 

w 

t) 

ca 

'I 

ex 

OD 


§ 


I 
o 


•a 

03 


H) 

n 
•5 

H 


CM                        •* 

m  <o  ••*"  to  o  •"*< 

m  «o  •"*  t^ 

os  m 

os  m 

^*  oo  i—  i-^mino^ 

(M  rH  (M  CM  O  CO          i—1 
CO                                   + 

i—  O  •*  t~ 
i-c               O 

rt  +   I  "-1 

m  o 

o               t— 
•*  •*  m  «o  o  oo; 

m  o  -*  >-i 

to 

r-<  OS 

o  •* 

CO«D<DOOOO^ 

CO   rH   rH   <?$   CO  CO            rH 

t-                   + 

i—  I  i—  1  (M  O 
OO               00 

+   I 

10  o 

t-              m 

o  os  to  to  oo  oo 

<M  i—  c  in  <o 

IO 
IO  CO 
<O  -* 

oo^foo-^ininoMi 
o  CM  •—<  T—  t  <M  <M       *—! 

1 

in  <M  1-1  .-c 

IM    l-H             l-H 
rH      ,       ,    ^ 

-*  O 

m               eo 

•*  co  m  «o  co  oo 

r-l  t—  CO  '-> 

«  r-l 
tO  -4< 

-I'OS-'JIOOOSOSO-** 
O  »—  i  i—  <         »—  i  i—  (         i—  i 

in                          | 

CO  •*  O  OO 
OJ                  OO 

1        1 

M<  O 

t- 

CO  CT>  t—  i  <M  ^<  OO 

CO  <O 

O  i—  i  co  co 

1C  CM 

OOt^'^'—  "CsOSO^ 
O  i—  i  i—  i                            •—  ' 
1                   1 

t-  t~  O  O 

to           to 
1 

CO  O 

••* 
to  O  ^1  '  —  i  O  CO 

m  m 

OS  to  -*  O5 

m 
m  t- 

tO  CM 

ooooocot—  ii-noin 

t—  (M   I-H   »—  I   r—  t  rH            t—  1 
<N                   ,                   + 

i-"  O  O  <ft 
co            co 

-.     +             -H 

to  O 

CO 

C5  •*  CO  CO  i—  1  CO 

CO  O  00  r-l 

oo  in 

SO  CM 

ooocoiMoooooin 

00  r-i  <M  <T)                      i—  i 

"•             1              1 

<M  (M  O  m 

f-H                     rH 

^       ,              ^ 

t-  o 

CO 

m  •*  oo  co  co  o 

t-  OO  <M  t~ 

OO  OS  r-l  OS 

M 

m  CM 

oo  ^^  o>  ^5  t*™  t^~  <*^>  m 

CO  ^H  CO  CO                          i—  1 

1         + 

OO  •*  rH  -* 

t~            oo 

+ 

00  O 

_g 

p' 

4 

^.£'g0      R  E  s   " 
| 

S     ' 

P 
t 

8   J 

;  •  ;|  I 

ilfii'.l 

•     •     •  S   3  OM    •   B 
^      "S  «  d        « 

Q               2      CS      §              *> 

S5jfl1ll 

Itlliii! 

f^^Q^SS^^ 

Electric  heat 
Bath  fall  . 
Radiation. 
Total  heat 

.    43 

£  2 

U.S 

M 

11 

Wco 

THERMAL  PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC   ACID  At  LOW  TEMPERATURES.       107 


fS 

i 

o 


CO                       00  O  00         f) 

•    O  O  O  CO  CO  O        O 

o  «o  o  «e  •    •    • 

«  t-  K5  W  -<  i—  O         O 

I                                + 

CO         00 
SI-  e-5  -r  I  -         M 
•»  •*  O   . 
to  f\  •*  O        O 

1           +     + 

<e              —      o 

t-  «o  —      « 

OOOO'feo^-i        o 
W  to  O  ~-  •     •     • 

^SSS?    ? 

o  <o  «•»  •*  o      o 
I               +      + 

1                                         + 

C<»                   00        O 

•       O   CO   l~   CO             -H 

~  i  ~  i  -  i  -    •           • 

•* 
ei  w  —      <M 

-f  <O  C-l  CO  O        O 
1                     +         + 

Cl  «O  —  O    •      •      • 
t-  oo  'f  O  O  O       O 

1                     1       1 

*-                   S«« 

•  ">«-*S     — 

—  «»•  to  oo  v 

••»«  <O  <M  «  O        O 

1                       +         + 

o  o  o      <n 

s£387«?r    r 

t-  >*  «  o  O  O       O 

1             III 

'.I          --• 

^5SS«    ? 

eo  o  n  co  o       O 
1                 +       + 

o>  I-H  o      e* 
oooo-*^to      <N 

•    -.  i  ,~  i  - 

OCOiOC-lOOO        O 

PH 

o 

oo      10 

SFI  0  «0  —         O 
O  O>  i»    • 
<O  71  «  O         O 

1           +     + 

1              III 

0. 

•*•"             ^H 

4 

l«  1« 
(~  m  w      eo 

OOOOlOOcO         CO 

«r 

i—  i 

eo  m  «  eo  • 
«o  «  w  o      o 

1           +     + 

| 

oo  «o  i—  «  o  o  o      o 
III        I 

bb 
<a 

t-           S     ^ 

•  •*  o  if  2     o 
o  to  te  o  T1 

i 

0> 

t> 

I                 I        I 

•S3 

13 

.2 

O  t*  O  1^  <O  O  CO         ^ 
^  IM  X  -*    * 

00  CO  ^  O  O  O        O 

III       1 

3 

•3 

M                     <O         — 

•   oo  n  o  ci      — 

•-<  «D  e«5  V)    • 
fi  «O  •*  <M  O         O 

1              1       1 

So 

1 

x 

«* 

d4  -  -o  -  -      - 

•  2 

1 
£ 

,-             -      '^ 

•      /     :  i  •--    — 
M  OO  <O  (N    • 

t^.  o  CT  o      o 
1              1       1 

+3 

•  — 

13 

E 

1 

•     C-1  O  <M  O         S 

-<«•  o  n  i-  • 

M) 

03 

+                1         1 

» 

£ 

CO                     CO         00 

g 

•8 
£ 

O  O»  00  -H    • 
«->»•-  «O  i—  O        O 

§ 

^ 

+            1       1 

-g 

—i                     <M         •<»• 

bC       O. 

«  O  -f  f-<    • 

.—    »  t-   1-H   O            O 

...      .  ^5    1 

+           1      1 

•  •  •  •  splj   J 

£ 

•,  •  -^JS    8 

8 

•is  1J:  ! 

(—1 

Initial  temperature  .  . 
Pressure  l>efore  throttle  va 
Pressure  after  throttle  val 
Drop  of  pressure  at  valve 
Change  of  temperature,  th 
Change  of  temperature,  nc 
Change  of  temperature,  di 

Change  of  temperature  pe 

Initial  temperature,  "  C. 
Initial  pressure,  p\  .  . 
Final  pressure,  y/-_.  .  . 
Fall  of  pressure  .  .  . 
Change  of  temperature* 

Change  of  temperature  pe 

P  2 


I'M 


G    FRKWKN  JENKTN  AND  MR.  D.   K.  PYE  ON  THE 


TABLE  VI. — Calculation  of  Latent  Heat. 


a. 

0. 

7- 

8. 

Latent  heat. 

Evaporation 
temperature,  "... 

Refrigeration. 
Series  I., 
NBCQ* 

I,  -I,. 
Series  II., 
THAM.* 

«(8t-0t\ 
Series  III., 
PECQ.* 

Is  -  1* 
Series  IV., 
SKHT.* 

L  =  a  +  0-y  +  S, 
RGER* 

°C. 

Th.U. 

Th.U. 

Th.U. 

Th.U. 

Th.U. 

-53-4 

47-0 

37-9 

4-4 

+  0-69 

81-2 

-6P6 

47-75 

35-7 

3-5 

+  0-51 

80-45 

-48-3 

48-2 

34-8 

3-72 

+  0-45 

79-75 

-43-2 

49-5 

31-2 

3-7 

+  0-35 

77-35 

-40-9 

48-5 

28-6 

1-5 

+  0-3 

75-9 

-35-6 

50-1 

24-7 

1-49 

+  0-18 

73-5 

-30-0 

50-0 

22-8 

1-3 

+  0-08 

71-6 

-26-1 

50-7 

20-6 

1-87 

0 

69-4 

-21-4 

50-8 

17-9 

1-7 

-0-07 

66-9 

-14-9 

51-3 

14-0 

1-7 

-0-1 

63-5 

-11-6 

50-0 

14-4 

2-0 

-0-21 

62-2 

-   8-6 

53-0 

11-0 

3-1 

-0-2 

60-7 

-   8-0 

50-67 

14-0 

4-22 

-0-25 

60-1 

-    1-7 

47-75 

10-0 

2-27 

-0-32 

55-2 

+   6-6 

46-1 

6-7 

3-61 

-0-37 

48-8 

+  13-4 

44-5 

4-5 

5-2 

-0-55 

43-25 

+  20-05 

39-35 

1-7 

4-2 

-0-35 

36-50 

These  letters  denote  the  areas  shown  in  fig.  7,  p.  74. 


TABLE  VII. — Total  Heat  I  and  Specific  Heat  Cp  of  Liquid  C02  at  Constant  Pressure. 

Taken  from  Curves. 


Temperature. 

I,  700  Ibs. 

I,  900  Ibs. 

(V 

-60 

-25-9 

0-47 

-40 

-21-0 

,__ 

0-49 

-30 

-16-0 



0-515 

-20 

-10-7 



0-54 

-10 

-    5-2 

-    5-5 

0-57 

0 

+   0-6 

+   0-3 

0-60 

+  10 

+   6-8 

+   6-5 

0-C4 

+  20 

~~~ 

+  13-1 

0-68 

THKKMAL   PROI'KI.TIKS  OF  CARBONIC  ACID   AT   LOW  TEMPERATURES.       109 


TAHLE  VIII. — $<f>  between  Pressure  Curves  and  Limit  Curve. 


Mean  temperature. 

>•«/>  between  limit 
curve  and 
700  lbs./8q.  inch 
line. 

o./.  between  700  and 
900  ll)8./8q.  inch 
lines. 

<ty  between  limit 
curve  and 
900  lbs./sq.  inch 
line. 

"C. 

-31-5 

0-00289 

0-00104                     0-00393 

-21-7                       0-0029 

0-00122 

0-0041 

-10-6                       0-0031 

0-00157 

0-0047 

+   0-5                       0-0024 

0-0025                       0-0049 

+   8-2 

— 

0-0033 

0-0049 

+  13-2 

— 

— 

0-00485 

+  17-9 

— 

— 

0-0031 

NOTE. — 700  Ibs.  curve  meets  limit  curve  at  +  12° -5  C. 
900  Ibs.  +  23°-2C. 


TABLE  IX. — Collected  Results. 


Tempera- 
ture. 

Pressure,* 
Authors. 

Liquid. 

Latent 

heat. 

Vapour. 

Vapour 
density. 

Pressure,* 
K.  and  R.  and 
AMAOAT. 

• 

I. 

* 

L 

I. 

*• 

•c. 

lb../«.« 

gr./c.c. 

!*./!„.* 

atmospheres. 

-50 

98 

-26-4 

-0-1064 

79-9 

53-9 

0-2515 

0-0181 

'.'7 

6-60 

-45 

120 

-23-8 

-0-0958 

77-8 

54-2 

0-2458 

0-0220 

119-5 

8-12 

-40 

145 

-21-2 

-0-0850 

75-7 

54-5 

0-2403 

0-0263 

144-5 

9-H2 

-35 

174 

-18-6 

-0-0742 

73-6 

55-0 

0-2350 

0-0316 

173-5 

11-8 

-30 

206 

-15-96 

-0-0635 

71-3 

55-35 

0-2300 

0-0378 

206 

14-0 

-25 

242£ 

-13-3 

-0-0528 

69-0 

55-7 

0-2253 

0-0448 

242-5 

16-5 

-20 

284 

-10-5 

-0-0422 

66-5 

56-0 

0-2207 

0-0528 

284 

19-3 

-15 

331 

-   7-7 

-0-0318 

63-8 

56-1 

0-2154 

0-0621 

329-5 

22-4 

-10 

384 

-   4-9 

-0-0211 

GO-9 

56-0 

0-2100 

0-0730 

382-5 

26-0 

-    5 

443 

-    2-05 

-0-0105 

57-7 

55-6 

0-2042 

0-0855 

441 

30-0 

0 

508 

+  0-91 

o-o 

54-1 

55-0 

0-1981 

0-100 

505 

34-35 

+   5 

580 

+    4-05 

+  0-0110 

50-3 

54-35 

0-1919 

0-117 

— 

— 

+  10 

658 

+   7-25 

+  0-0223 

46-2 

53-45 

0-1850 

0-138 

653 

44-4 

+  15 

743 

+  10-4 

+  0-0331 

41-9 

52-3 

0-1775 

0-163 

— 

— 

+  20 

835 

+  13-45 

+  0-0435 

36-55 

50-0 

0-1682 

0-196 

829 

56-4 

*  The  pressures  given  in  the  last  column,  taken  from  KUENKN  and  RORSON'S  figures  from  -  50°  C.  to 
0°  C.  and  from  AMAOAT'S  from  0"  C.  to  +  20°  C.,  are  probably  more  accurate  than  the  authors',  for  reasons 
explained  on  p.  95. 


no 


PROF.  C.   FKEWEN  JKNKIN   AND  MR.  D.   R.   PYE  ON  THE 


TABLE  X. — Comparison  of  Pressure-Temperature  Observations  for  Saturated  CO2 

Vapour. 

Pressure  in  Atmospheres  (7fiO  mm.  Hg). 


Temperature. 

Authors. 

REGNAULT. 

CAII.LETKT. 

AMAGAT. 

K.  and  R. 

Z.  and  S. 

1912. 

1862. 

1878. 

1891. 

1902. 

1906. 

-60 

4-35 

4-30 

4-35 

-56 

5-24 

— 

— 

— 



5-19 

-55 

5-44 

— 

— 

— 

5-35 

-54 

5-64 

— 

5-46 





-50 

6-66 

— 

6-8 



6-GO 

6-73 

-46 

7-86 

— 

— 

— 



7-89 

-45 

8-16 

— 





8-12 

-44 

8-50 

— 

8-72 



-40 

9-86 

— 

10-25 



9-82 

9-88 

-35 

11-84 

— 

— 



11-8 

11-92 

-34 

12-25 

— 

12-7 



-30 

14-0 

— 



14-0 

14-21 

-25 
-20 

16-52 
19-3 

17-12 
19-93 

— 

— 

16-5 
19-3 

16-74 
19-52 

-  15 

22-5 

23-14 

— 



22-4 

22-46 

-  10 

26-1 

26-76 

— 

— 

26-0 

25-83 

-   7 

28-5 

— 

— 





27-80 

-  5 

30-1 

30-84 





30-0 

0 

34-55 

35-40 



34-4 

34-3 

+   5 

38-43 

40-47 

+  10 

44-75 

46-07 



44-4 

+  15 

50-5 

52-2 



+  20 

56-8 

58-85 



56-4 

+  25 

— 

66-1 

+  30 

I 

73-85 

— 

70-7 

— 

— 

IIII.KMAL   PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID   AT  LOW  TlvMi'KKATURES.        Ill 


TABLE  XL— Series  I.     Test  I.  on  March  25,  1912. 
C.F.J.  Record. 


Time. 

(  lunge 
pressure. 

Voltmeter. 

Time  of 
ring. 

Weight  on 
flask. 

Cold 
junction 
tem- 
perature. 

Atmospheric 
tem- 
perature. 

Coil  A. 

Coil  C. 

h.     in. 

lb«./in.1 

rolb 

roll* 

m.     -. 

lb». 

•C. 

"0. 

12  18 

266 

98-2 

99-3 

18    21 

5 

— 

Start. 

19 

3 

8-3 

9-4 

— 

7 

12-47 

13-4 

20 

3 

99-4 

100-3 

20     2 

21 

4 

8-3 

99-8 

— 

11 

22 

2 

8-0 

9-4 

23 

3 

8-1 

9-2 

23  17 

• 

24 

4 

8-1 

9-3 

— 

15 

25 

5 

6-1 

:••- 

— 

— 

12-475 

13-4 

26 

5 

6-1 

9-8 

26  34 

27 

4 

6-2 

9-7 

— 

19 

28 

3 

5-7 

9-6 

29 

3 

90-0 

100-1 

29  57 

30 

2 

88-8 

99-6 

— 

23 

31 

3 

89-1 

99-3 

32 

5 

89-2 

9-2 

33 

5 

89-3 

9-3 

33  18 

34 

5 

9-9 

9-9 

— 

27 

35 

3 

9-5 

9-5 

36 

2 

9-4 

9-3 

36  45 

37 

2 

9-7 

9-8 

— 

31 

38 

3 

9-9 

9-9 

39 

3               95-6 

9-9 

40 

2 

4-9 

9-5 

40     9 

• 

41 

1 

5-0 

9-5 

41  50 

33 

42 

3 

5-1 

100-2- 

35 

43 

3 

5-8 

0-2 

43  34 

— 

12-51 

13-50  Stop. 

Mean    1       „.,„., 
pressure  / 

Duration,  25-217  mins. 

{97-5     for     !i  •»•>:>  in  in.v 
89-48    „     10-0       „             99-646for  25-22  mins.,  Coil  C. 
95-28    „      5-57     „ 

{97-14  for     9-65  mins. 
89-06    „    10-0      „             99-106  for  25-22  mins.,  Coil  C. 
94-80    „      5-57     „ 

Mean  absolute  pressure,  272. 

Mean  0*  -21  -4. 

Heat  =  1484  Th.U. 

ML- 


PROF,  c   i  I;I:\\I:N  .IKNKIN  ANI>  MK.  D.  R.  PYE  ON  THE 


TAHLB  XII.— Series  I.     Test  I.  on  March  25,  l!M2. 


D.K.R  liecord. 


T.J.  No.  1. 

T.J.  No.  2. 

T.J.  No.  5. 

Bath  temperature. 

Exit  gas  temperature. 

Liquid  temperature. 

Time. 

Potentiometer. 

Time. 

Potentiometer. 

Time. 

Potentiometer. 

h.  m.     f. 

ohms         cm. 

h.   m.      s. 

ohms         cin. 

h.    m.      -. 

ohm          cm. 

12  10    0 

-5       74J 

12  12    0 

-5       56J             12  14  30 

+  0       19i 

16 

71 

16 

+  0       19| 

18  30 

72J 

19 

20 

+  0       15 

Start  I2h.  18m.  47s. 

22 

7l| 

23 

24 

-0       5 

26 

70- 

27 

28 

-0       29 

30 

70 

31 

52 

32 

-0       52£ 

34 

71 

35 

53 

36 

-0       78 

38 

73 

39 

54 

40 

-1        14 

41 

75 

42 

75 

43 

55J 

44 

-1        43J 

Stop  12h.  44m.  Os. 

45 

75 

46  30 

76 

Note.—  D.R.P.  watch 

48 

n\ 

[ 

was    26s.    fast    on  | 

C.F.J.  watch. 

Means.    .    . 

-5       73J 

-5       53 

Plotted. 

Temperature 

1 

from  cali- 
bration curve 

|        -16" 

•1C. 

-15°-OC. 

+   9"-7C. 

ohms       cm. 

Hath 

temperature  at  start    -5         72-4 

„            finish  ....          -  K        7fi  •  7R 

fall  . 

n°  .  i  n  r< 

1-  IF. 

Correction  for  change  of  cold  junction  temperature    .     .     .     =   -  0°  •  05  , 

Therefore  nett  bath  fall 

0°-14 

THERMAL  PROPERTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.       113 


TABLE  XIII. — Series  II.     Test  III.  on  March  26,  1912. 
C.F.J.  Record. 


Time. 

Voltmeter 
coil  D. 

Time  of 
ring. 

Weight  on 
flask. 

Cold 
junction 
temperature 

Atmospheric 
tem- 
perature. 

h.   m. 

T01U. 

m.    i. 

DM. 

°C. 

°C. 

4  46 

63-6 

— 

14 

14-51* 

16-3* 

*  At  4h.  42m. 

47 

4-2 

46  32 

— 

— 

— 

Start. 

48 

4-4 

— 

16 

49 

4-1 

49  29 

50 

5-9 

— 

18 

51 

4-2 

52 

5-2 

52  25 

53 

4-7 

— 

20 

54 

4-1 

:,.-, 

3-9 

55  17 

t 

56 

4-3 

— 

22 

57 

3-9 

58 

3-9 

58    9 

59 

3-8 

_ 

24 

5  00 

4-0 

1 

4-1 

1     1 

2 

3-9 

— 

26 

3 

4-9 

3  54 

4 

4-6 

— 

28 

5 

3-9 

6 

4-0 

6  48 

• 

7 

4-1 



30 

8 

3-2 

9 

3-3 

9  45 

10 

2-5 

— 

32 

11 

1-8 

12 

3-2 

12  43 

13 

3-0 

— 

34 

14 

3-8 

15 

4-1 

15  43 

— 

14-51 

16-7 

Slap. 

36 

Duration,  29*  18  in  ins. 

Mean     .     .     63  '96 

Corrected!      AQ.™ 
volts      I     63  70 

(63-7)»x29-18m.x3-189       , 

77-5Th.U. 

10» 

VOL.  CCXIH. A. 


II I 


PROF.  C.   l'i;i:WKN  JENKIN  AND  MR  D.   It.  PYE  ON  THE 


TAHLE  XIV.— Series  II.     Test  III.  on  March  26,  1912. 


D.R.P.  Record. 


i 


T.J.  No.  1. 

T.J.  No.  3. 

T.J.  No.  4. 

Bath  temperature. 

Initial  temperature. 

Final  temperature. 

Time. 

Potentiometer. 

Time. 

Potentiometer. 

Time. 

Potentiometer. 

h.    m.     a. 

ohm         cm 

h.    m.      e. 

ohms         cm. 

h.   m.     s. 

"Inn            cm 

4  42    0 

-1       26; 

1 

4  43    0 

-8         8{ 

4  44     0 

-1        24 

Start  4h.  47m.  29s. 

45 

26, 

46 

8 

47 

24 

Slop  5h.  16m.  39s. 

48 

26J 

; 

49 

6f 

50 

23f 

51 

25 

52 

4 

53 

22| 

Note.—  D.R.P.  watch 

54 

24 

55 

6 

56 

22^ 

56s.  fast  on  C.F.J. 

57 

25 

58 

5 

59 

23J 

watch. 

500 

26 

5     1     0 

4f 

520 

24| 

3 

27i 

4 

5 

5 

25 

6 

27, 

7 

6£ 

8 

25^ 

9 

27- 

10 

7 

11 

25j 

> 

12 

29 

13 

8J 

14 

15 

30 

16 

8| 

17 

26j 

17  30 

29} 

18 

30 

Means.    .    . 

-1       27- 

5 

-8         6-6 

-1        24- 

3 

Temperature 

+   8° 

•5C. 

-25°-6C. 

+    8" 

•3C. 

4 

ohm         cm. 

Bath  temperature  at  start  ....      -  1          26-3 

»                i.            finish     ...      -1          29-85 

Correction  for  cold  junction  .                                                   n°  •  n 

Nettfall     .     .     . 

" 

0°-195  „ 

TIIKIiMAI,   I'KOPKKTIES  OF  CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.       115 


TABLE  XV.— Series  III.     Test  IV.  on  March  28,  1912. 
C.F.J.  Record. 


Time. 

Voltmeter, 
coilD. 

Time  of 
ring. 

Weight  on 
flask. 

Cold 
junction 
temperature. 

Atmospheric 
tem- 
perature. 

h.  m. 

TOIU. 

in.   ». 

)b*. 

°C. 

°C. 

5  19 



_ 

12 

14-32* 

15  -Of 

*At5h.9m.  tAt5h.l(im. 

20 

46-9 

20  32 

— 

— 

— 

Start. 

21 

•9 

— 

14 

22 

•9 

22  23 

23 

•8 

— 

18 

24 

•9 

25 

•7 

26 

47-1 

26     7 

— 

14-34 

27 

•3 

— 

22 

28 

•4 

29 

•5 

29  46 

30 

•1 

— 

26 

31 

•2 

— 

— 

— 

15-3 

32 

•o 

33 

4G-9 

33  31 

34 

•9 



30 

14-36 

35 

47-0 

36 

•1 

37 

•0 

37  18 

, 

38 

•1 

— 

32 

39 

•2 

39  12 

— 

14-365 

15-2 

Slop. 

Duration,  18  '67  mius. 

Mean    .     .       47-15 

Volts    .     .       46-96 

Hoat       (46-96)'xl8-67m.x3-189       ,31.oThU 

Q   2 


in; 


PROF.  C.    I  u:\VI.N   JENKIN  AND  MR.  D.  R.   PYE  ON  THE 


TABLE  XVI.— Series  III.     Test  IV.  on  March  28,  1912. 
D.RP.  Record. 


T.J.  No.  1. 

T.J.  No.  3. 

T.J.  No.  4. 

Bath  temperature. 

Initial  temperature. 

Final  temperature. 

Time. 

Potentiometer. 

Time. 

Potentiometer. 

Time. 

Potentiometer. 

h.    m.     • 

ohm          cm. 

h.    m.     s. 

ohm          cm. 

h.   m.     s. 

ohm           cm. 

5  17     0 

-0          57 

5  17  30 

-5         49' 

1 

5   18     0 

-0         54f 

19 

57J 

20 

50; 

[ 

21 

55- 

22 

58 

23 

51 

24 

55; 

25 

58f 

26 

48, 

27 

55; 

28 

58} 

29 

47] 

30 

56 

31 

59 

32 

45 

33 

55f 

34 

59i 

35 

47 

36 

55| 

37 

59 

38 

51; 

39 

55£ 

40 

59 

Means    .    . 

-0         58-4 

-5         49 

-0         55-7 

Temperature 

+        ir-ic. 

13° 

•oc. 

+            11°-2C. 

olim 

cm. 

Bath  temperature  at  start    ....      =  -  0 

57-75 

„             „          „  finish  ....     =  -0 

59-0 

„    fall  

1  •  9R  nrr>            f>°  •  f>7  P 

Correction  for  change  of  cold  junction  temperature   .     .     .      -  0°  •  03  „ 

Nettfall     .... 

....         Q°-04 

THERMAL   PROPERTIES  OF   CARBONIC  ACID  AT  LOW  TEMPERATURES.      117 


TABLE  XVII. — Comparison  of  0^  Diagrams. 


4>  liquid. 

Latent  heat. 

<f>  vapour. 

Temperature. 

Authors'. 

MOI.UER'S. 

Authors'. 

M'-l  Mill:'-. 

Authors'. 

MOI.I.IKR'H. 

•o. 

+  20 

+  0-0435            +0-045 

36-55 

36-93 

0-1682 

0-171 

+  10 

+  0-0223 

+  0-021 

46-2 

47-74 

0-1850 

0-189 

0 

0 

0 

54-1 

55-45 

0-1981 

0-203 

-10 

-0-0211 

-0-019 

60-9 

61-47 

0-2100 

0-215 

-20 

-0-0422 

-0-036 

66-5 

65-35 

0-2207 

0-226 

-30 

-0-0635 

-0-053 

71-3 

70-4 

0-2300 

0-236 

-40 

-0-0850 

— 

75-7 

— 

0-2403 



-50 

-0-1064 

— 

79-9 

— 

0-2515 

— 

TABLE  XVIII. — New  Data  arranged  as  in  MOLLIER'S  paper  (l)  and  EWINO'S 
'  Mechanical  Production  of  Cold  '  (4). 


Tempo  ra- 

l^rAaoiiff* 

BKUN'S 

Volume  of 

Latent  heat, 

*• 

ture. 

1  1  DHoUI  <  . 

volumo 
liquid. 

vapour. 

1- 

r. 

Liquid. 

Vapour. 

°0. 

kg./om.* 

o.o./gr. 

o.c./gr. 

-00 

6-82 

0-866             55-2 

-26-6 

79-9 

-0-1064 

0-2515 

-45 

8-41 

0-881              45-4 

-24-0 

77-8 

-0-0958 

0-2458 

-  40 

10-16 

0-896             38-0 

-21-45 

75-7            -0-0850 

0-2403 

-35 

12-20 

0-912 

31-65 

-18-9 

73-6            -0-0742 

0-2350 

-30 

14-49 

0-930 

26-45                16-3 

71-3            -0-0635 

0-2300 

-25 

17-05 

0-958 

22-30            -13-75 

69-0            -0-0528 

0-2253 

-20 

19-96             0-970 

18-95             -11-0 

66-5            -0-0422 

0-2207 

-15 

23-16             0-993 

16-10                 8-3 

63-8            -0-0318 

0-2154 

-10 

26-9 

1-02 

13-70 

-    5-6 

60-9            -0-0211 

0-2100 

-   6 

31-0               1-048 

11-70 

-    2-85 

57-7 

-0-0105 

0-2042 

0 

35-5               1-08 

10-00 

o-o 

54-1               0-0000 

0-1981 

+   5 

40-5               1-119               8-55 

+   3-00 

50-3 

+  0-0100 

0-1919 

+  10 

45-9               1-163 

7-25 

+   6-05 

46-2 

+  0-0223 

0-1850 

+  16 

51-8                1-222 

6-13 

+   9-10 

41-9 

+  0-0331 

0-1775 

+  20 

58-3 

1-295 

5-10 

+  11-95 

36-08 

+  0-0435 

0-1682 

- 

IV.   The    ('a  parity  for   Heat  of  Metals  at  Different   Temperatures,  being  an 
Account  of  Experiments  performed  in  the  Research  Laboratory  of  the 

i///   Cn//ii/i    a/  '  Sunlli    II  till*  a,,  <l  Monmouthshire. 


By  E.  H.  GRIFFITHS,  Sc.D.,  F.M.S.,  and  EZER  GRIFFITHS,  B.Sc.,  Fellow  of  the 

University  of  Wales. 

Received  April  1,—  Read  May  1,  1913. 


CONTENTS. 
Section.  Page 

I.  Introductory 119 

II.  Outline  of  apparatus 122 

III.  Measurement  of  temperature 126 

IV.  Measurement  of  the  resistance  of  the  heating  coil 131 

V.  Measurement  of  potential  difference 137 

VI.  The  thermal  capacity  of  accessory  substances 138 

VII.  Measurement  of  mass 140 

VIII.  Measurement  of  time 141 

IX.  Temperature  control  of  the  baths 141 

X.  Methods  of  experiments— 

(1)  Total  heat 143 

(2)  Intersection      .!  '..'.'.'. 147 

XI.  Experimental  results — 

(1)  Cu,  (2)  Al,  (3)  Fe,  (4)  Zn,  (5)  Ag,  (6)  Cd,  (7)  Sn,  (8)  Pb 159 

XII.  Summary  of  results 170 

XIII.  NERNST'S  observations  at  low  temperatures 175 

APPENDIX  I.     Discussion  of  the  results 178 

APPENDIX  II.     The  relation  between  melting-points  and  atomic  heats 183 

APPENDIX  III.     The  soldering  of  glass  and  quartz  tubes  to  metal 184 

SECTION  I. 
Introductory. 

A  STUDY  of  the  published  determinations  of  the  capacity  for  heat  of  the  elements 
leads  to  the  conclusion  that  further  information  of  an  accurate  nature  is  desirable.  It 
will  be  found  that,  in  most  cases,  the  values  are  deduced  by  observations  of  the  heat 
absorbed  or  given  out  when  the  changes  of  temperature  are  large,  and  the  conclusions 

VOL.  CCXIII. A    500.  Published  separately,  July  28,  1913. 


120  DR.   K.    H.   GRIFFITHS   AND   MR.    EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 

derived  therefrom  are  based  on  the  assumption  that  the  relation  between  the  specific 
heat  and  the  temperature  is  of  a  linear  order. 

Again,  some,  in  fact  a  large  majority,  are  comparative  determinations  and 
dependent  on  the  capacity  for  heat  of  other  bodies,  as,  for  example,  those  which 
assume  REGNAULT'S  values  for  the  capacity  for  heat  of  water  at  ordinary  tempe- 
ratures —  values  which  we  now  know  to  be  inaccurate. 

The  experimental  difficulties  connected  with  the  method  of  mixtures  are  considerable 
and  that  method  has  probably  been  pushed  to  its  extreme  limits  of  accuracy.  The 
agreement  between  the  results  obtained  by  different  observers,  and  also  between  those 
resulting  from  repetition  by  the  same  observer,  is  rarely  satisfactory.  The  tempe- 
rature changes  have,  as  a  rule,  been  measured  by  means  of  mercury  thermometers, 
without  a  proper  appreciation  of  the  difficulties  attendant  upon  the  use  of  those 
instruments  for  accurate  work. 

A  further  possible  source  of  uncertainty  is  the  effect  of  the  sudden  chilling  of  a 
metal  when  rapidly  cooled  from  a  high  temperature. 

The  experimental  conditions  have  not  been  varied  sufficiently  to  demonstrate  the 
absence  of  unsuspected  causes  of  error  and,  according  to  the  chemists,  sufficient  care 
has  not  been  devoted  to  the  detection  and  elimination  of  the  impurities  present  in  the 
samples  used. 

It  is  true  that  there  are  determinations  of  a  high  order  of  accuracy  which  may  not 
justly  be  subject  to  this  criticism,  but  such  examples  are  few  and  it  is  difficult, 
when  comparing  the  evidence,  to  assign  to  each  determination  its  due  weight. 

As  an  illustration  of  the  divergences  which  exist,  we  append  the  values  given  by 
leading  authorities  in  the  case  of  copper,  a  metal  which  does  not  appear  to  present 
any  peculiar  difficulties  and  one  in  which  the  values  obtained  by  different  observers 
are,  on  the  whole,  in  better  agreement  than  is  the  case  with  other  metals. 

All  the  observers  agree  with  the  conclusion  that  the  capacity  for  heat  of  copper  is 
a  function  of  the  temperature,  but  they  differ  markedly  as  to  the  value  of  the  function. 
For  example  TOMLINSON  ('Roy.  Soc.  Proc.,'  1885)  gives 

S,  =  G'09008  +  0'0000648£. 

LOREXZ  gives  values  at  0°  C.,  50°  C.  and  75°  C.,  from  which  the  Mowing  expression 
is  obtained  :  — 

S,  =  G'0898  +  0' 


an  expression  which  denotes  that  the  specific  heat  increases  more  rapidly  than  the 
temperature. 

GAEDE  ('Phys.  Zeitschr.,'  4,  1902)  gives  values  at  various  temperatures  between 
J.  and  92"  C.,  from  which  the  following  expression  can  be  deduced  :— 


S,  =  0' 
This  would  give  a  maximum  capacity  for  heat  at  a  temperature  of  341°  C. 


CAPACITY  FOR  HEAT  OF   METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES. 


121 


If  we  consider  the  endeavours  to  ascertain  the  mean  capacity  over  the  range  0°  C. 
to  100°  C.,  the  same  lack  of  agreement  is  evident.     For  copper  we  have — 


Temperature  range. 

°0. 

15-100 

0-100 

At  50 

17-100 

23-100 

15  100 

At  50 


Specific  heat. 

G'09331 

G'09332 

0-09169 

G'09333 

0-0940 

0-09232 

0-09261 


Observer. 

I '.U.K. 

TMMI.INSMV. 

LORENZ. 

NAOCARI. 
TROWBRIDGE. 
TILDEN. 
GAEDE. 


The  methods  described  in  this  paper,  although  they  doubtless  present  their  own 
peculiar  difficulties,  are,  we  believe,  free  from  many,  if  not  all,  of  the  sources  of  error 
above  referred  to.  The  method  is  briefly  indicated  in  the  following  numbered 
paragraphs : — 

1.  The  energy  was  supplied  electrically  and  the  conclusions  are  not  dependent 
upon  any  assumption    concerning  the  capacity  for  heat  of  other  bodies  than  those 
under  consideration. 

2.  The  substances  were  raised  across  a  given  temperature  through  very  small  ranges 
of  temperature  (extreme  limit  of  range,  about  1°'4  C.). 

3.  These  temperature  changes  were  measured  by  means  of'  differential  platinum 
thermometers,  for  which  purpose  these  instruments  are  admirably  adapted. 

4.  Large  masses  of  the  substances  were  used,  ranging  from  1  to  4  kgr. 

5.  The   apparatus  was   constructed  with   all   its   parts   duplicated.      The   metals 
examined  were  suspended  by  quartz  tubes  in  similar  air-tight  brass  cases  whicli  were 
placed  side  by  side  in  a  large  tank  containing  rapidly  stirred  water  or  oil.     This  tank 
was  electrically  controlled  with  great  constancy  at  any  given  temperature,  00. 

One  of  the  metal  blocks  remained  at  the  tank  temperature  throughout  an  experi- 
ment while  the  other,  having  been  previously  cooled  below  00,  was  raised  to  a 
somewhat  similar  temperature  above  it  by  a  supply  of  heat  electrically  developed  in 
the  centre  of  the  block,  the  difference  in  temperature  between  the  two  blocks  being 
determined  at  regular  intervals  by  means  of  the  differential  platinum  thermometers. 

All  changes  in  the  surrounding  conditions  would  therefore  affect  both  blocks  equally  ; 
hence,  by  measuring  the  difference  of  temperature  only,  many  possible  causes  of  error 
were  eliminated. 

6.  The  equation  connecting  the  various  quantities  is 


where  M  =  total  mass,  S    its  specific  heat ;  0,  the  initial  temperature,  and  03  the 
final  temperature ;  E,  the  potential  difference  at  the  extremities  of  the  resistance 
VOL.  ccxin. — A.  R 


122  DR-  K.  H-  GRIFFITHS  AND  MR.  EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 


coil  R  ;  *J  =  4'184x  10'  ;  and  Q,  the  number  of  thermal  units  lost  or  gained  during 
time  t  from  sources  other  than  the  electrical  supply. 

In  these  experiments  the  values  of  fy  and  0a  were  so  arranged  that  Q  was  in  every 
case  small  or  negligible,  and,  if  necessary,  could  be  estimated  with  sufficient  accuracy. 

7.  With  two  exceptions,  the  samples   of  metals  used  were  supplied  by  Messrs. 
Johnson  and  Matthey,  to  whom  we  wish  to  express  our  sincere  thanks  for  the  trouble 
they  have  taken  in  the  matter.     Their  certificate  concerning  the  degree  of  purity  is 
in  each  case  appended.     Information  regarding  the  remaining  metals  (Cu  and  Fe) 
will  be  found  in  the  sections  dealing  with  those  two  elements. 

8.  Experiments  on  identical  samples  at  the  same  temperature  were  repeated  under 
very  varied  conditions,  in  order  to  enable  us  to  detect  unsuspected  sources  of  experi- 
mental error.     Two  separate  methods  of  experiment,  involving  different  data  and 
methods  of  reduction,  were  employed.     Three  different  sets  of  differential  platinum 
thermometers  were  used.     The  rate  of  heat  supply  was  varied  in  the  ratio  of  9  :  1. 
The  determination  of  S  at  a  given  temperature  with  a  particular  sample  was  in  several 
OMOO  repeated  after  the  lapse  of  some  months  ;    the  quartz  tubes  and  cover  were 
replaced  by  others  of  different  masses  &c.     We  were  thus  enabled  to  ascertain  causes 
of  error  which  would  otherwise  have  remained  undetected  (see  p.  139). 

9.  The  results  of  our  observations  have  been  deduced  from  the  actual  experimental 
numbers  and  in  no  case  from  "  smoothed  curves." 

The  most  serious  difficulty  presented  by  this  method  of  experiment  is  that  of 
determining  the  mean  temperature  of  the  block  of  metal  when  its  temperature  is 
altering.  Temperature  gradients  must  necessarily  exist,  since  equalisation  of 
temperature  by  stirring  is  an  impossibility.  The  manner  in  which  this  difficulty  was 
surmounted  is  described  in  later  sections. 

When  embarking  on  this  investigation  we  proposed  to  extend  our  range  of  tempe- 
rature to  the  lowest  point  obtainable  by  means  of  liquid  air,  limiting  the  inquiry  to 
the  study  of  two  or  three  metals  only.  Owing,  however,  to  delay  by  the  contractors 
in  the  delivery  of  the  liquid-air  plant,  we  were  compelled  to  postpone  that  portion 
of  our  investigation  dealing  with  temperatures  below  0°  C.  to  a  later  date,  and 
therefore  enlarged  the  scope  of  our  inquiry  so  as  to  include  the  following  metals, 
namely,  Aluminium,  Iron,  Copper,  Zinc,  Silver,  Cadmium,  Tin  and  Lead. 

As  the  data  already  accumulated  concerning  the  capacity  for  heat  of  these  metals 
over  the  range  0°  C.  to  100°  C.  may  be  useful  to  other  obsorvers,  we  see  no  reason  for 
delaying  the  publication  of  the  work  already  completed. 

SECTION  II. 

Outline  of  Apparatus  and  of  the  Method  of  Experiment. 
A  diagrammatic  sketch  of  the  apparatus  within  the  tank  is  indicated  in  fig.  1. 


f  FK  this  value  of  J'  see  P-  no 

of  Energy,'  by  E.  H.  GRIFFITHS  (Camb.  Univ.  Press). 


CAPACITY  FOR  HEAT  OF  METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.          123 
\ 


*—  Dry  Air 

(while  cooling 
Cube  in  ° 
position) 


1-J4  DR.   R   II-  CKIFFITHS  AND  MR.  EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 

As  the  left-hand  portion  is  a  replica  of  the  right,  it  will  suffice  to  describe  the 

latter  only. 

The  metal  (A),  whose  capacity  for  heat  was  to  be  determined,  was  cast  and  then 
"  turned"  into  the  form  of  a  cylinder  15'2  cm.  long  and  57  cm.  in  diameter. 

This  cylinder  fitted  accurately  into  a  thin  copper  case  (C)  of  mass,  apart  from  the 
lid,  of  149  grms.  Thus  the  actual  radiating  surface  surrounding  the  metal  blocks  was 
similar  throughout  all  experiments. 

Two  small  copper  pins  attached  A  in  its  proper  position  to  the  copper  lid  to  which 
the  case  was  fastened  by  a  copper  ring  bearing  a  screw  thread. 

Three  quartz  tubes  passed  through  the  brass  pipes  fixed  in  the  lid  of  the  external 
case,  and  supported  the  copper  case  and  block  within  the  outer  brass  cylinder. 

These  quartz  tubes  having  been  previously  platinized  were  soldered  at  their  lower 
ends  into  short  copper  ferrules  which  formed  parts  of  the  copper  lid  and  at  their  upper 
extremities  to  the  top  of  the  brass  tubes  which,  for  7  cm.  of  their  length,  were  washed 
by  the  tank  liquid. 

Between  the  case-lid  and  the  outer  brass  lid  a  mica  disc  of  nearly  the  diameter  of 
the  brass  cylinder  was  placed  and  through  it  passed  the  three  quartz  tubes. 

After  the  metal  block  had  been  fixed  in  its  case  and  pins  and  ring  firmly  screwed 
home,  the  case  and  contents  were  lowered  into  the  outer  brass  vessel,  the  edges  of  the 
mica  disc  (which  were  slightly  padded  with  cotton  wool)  resting  on  a  projecting 
circular  ring  (H)  about  3'5  cm.  above  the  top  of  the  copper  lid.  Thus  the  effect  of 
the  flow  of  convection  currents  from  inner  to  outer  case,  or  vice-versd,  was 
diminished.  The  brass  lid  was  firmly  screwed  down  over  a  lead  ring  by  eight  bolts. 

After  the  parts  were  assembled,  the  air-tightness  of  the  apparatus  was  ascertained 
both  by  pressure  and  exhaust  tests.  The  lateral  clearance  between  the  inner  and 
outer  cases  was  2  cm.  ;  the  vertical,  between  the  lids,  6 '5  cm. ;  and  between  the 
bases,  6 '5  cm. 

The  volume  of  air  contained  in  the  brass  case  after  insertion  of  the  metal  block  was 
about  1500  c.c.  A  pressure  gauge  containing  a  light  oil  was  connected  by  means  of 
a  3-way  tap  with  one  of  the  tubes  leading  from  this  case  to  the  exterior  of  the  tank. 
Observations  of  the  air  pressure  within  the  case  were  taken  immediately  before  and 
after  an  experiment.  The  air  being  slightly  warmed,  the  pressure  rose  during  that 
interval,  and  thus  the  presence  of  any  leakage  could  be  detected. 

The  annular  air  space  could  be  regarded  as  the  bulb  of  a  constant  volume  _ 
thermometer,  and  from  the  change  in  pressure  during  an  experiment,  the  change  i 
the  average  temperature  of  the  enclosed  air  could  be  deduced. 

It  was  found  that  this  change  was  about  one-sixth  of  that  of  the  contained  block. 

The  approximate  magnitude  of  any  correction  rendered  necessary  by  the  capacity 
for  heat  of  the  contained  air  could  thus  be  ascertained  (see  Section  VI.). 

In   our   preliminary   experiments   the   copper   case    was   placed    within   specially 
11  vacuum  vessels,"  the  exterior  walls  of  which  fitted   closely   into   the 


air 
in 


CAPACITY  FOR   HEAT  <>F    MKTALS   AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.          125 

surrounding  brass   vessels.     The   reasons   for    discarding    their   use   are   given    on 
p.  159. 

A  cylindrical  hole  (K),  !)  nun.  in  diameter  and  14  cm.  in  length,  was  bored  down 
the  centre  of  each  metal  block,  co-axial  with  the  central  quartz  tube. 

Into  this  was  fitted  t  h«  "  heating  coil,"  the  wire  of  which  was  wound  on  a  light  mica 
frame  of  the  X  section  used  for  platinum  thermometers.  The  edges  of  the  frame  were 
deeply  serrated  to  prevent  any  possible  contact  between  the  wire  and  the  surrounding 
metal  \v;ills.  This  hole  was  filled,  at  low  temperatures,  with  liquid  paraffin  (previously 
boiled  and  placed  in  vacuo  to  drive  off  volatile  constituents),  and  at  the  higher 
temperatures  with  a  heavy  hydro-carbon  oil. 

Small  mica  "  baffle  plates  "  were  inserted  at  intervals  into  the  triangular  sections 
of  the  mica  rack,  in  such  a  manner  as  to  deflect  the  convection  currents  outwards. 

The  hole  O  (depth  10 '3  cm.,  diameter  I'l  cm.),  co-axial  with  the  left-hand  quartz 
tube,  contained  one  of  the  differential  thermometers,  the  other  being  inserted  into  the 
corresponding  hole  in  the  left-hand  block. 

The  position  of  the  hole  O  was  such  that  about  half  the  total  mass  of  metal  was 
contained  in  the  annular  ring  whose  outer  surface  was  in  contact  with  the  copper 
case,  and  whose  inner  passed  through  the  centre  of  the  hole.  The  various  precautions 
taken  to  secure  accuracy  in  the  use  of  these  differential  thermometers  will  be  described 
in  Section  III. 

The  third  hole  (G)  was  used  for  the  purposes  of  cooling  the  block  below  the 
surrounding  temperature,  by  the  insertion  of  a  thin-walled  glass  tube  containing  ether 
and  connected  with  a  water  pump. 

When  the  bath  temperature  was  high  the  cooling  process  was  a  rapid  one,  but 
somewhat  tedious  at  lower  temperatures. 

To  prevent  the  entrance  of  laboratory  air  within  the  brass  cases  during  cooling— 
which,  by  the  deposition  of  moisture,  might  have  had  a  serious  effect,  especially 
when  the  tank  temperature  was  0°  C. — a  current  of  well-dried  air  was  passed  by 
a  branch  tube  into  a  larger  one  (F)  which  formed  a  continuation  of  the  quartz 
tube  leading  to  the  cooling  hole.  This  rapid  up-flow  of  dry  air  was  continued  until 
the  cooling  tube  had  been  withdrawn  and  replaced  by  a  glass  stopper,  the  lower  end 
of  which  reached  within  3  cm.  of  the  inner  copper  lid,  and  thus  prevented  convection 
currents. 

Our  methods  of  experiment  involved  measurements  of  the  following  quantities  : — 

(1)  Temperature; 

(2)  Resistance  of  heating  coil ; 

(3)  Potential  difference  at  ends  of  heating  coil ; 

(4)  Mass ; 

(5)  Time; 

(6)  Thermal   capacities   of  such   bodies   as   oil,  quartz,  &c.,    whose    temperature 

changed  with  that  of  the  metal  blocks. 


126  DR.   E.   H.   CHIFFITHS  AND  MR.  EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON   THE 

The  validity  of  our  final  conclusions  is  dependent  upon  the  accuracy  with  which 
th.-s,-  ,,u.mtitirs  NV.TO  determined,  and  in  the  following  sections  will  be  found  a 
description  of  the  methods  adopted  for  their  measurement.  An  error  of  1  in  1000 
in  Nos.  1,  2,  4  and  5  supra,  and  an  error  of  1  in  2000  in  No.  3  would  affect  our  final 
results  by  O'l  per  cent.  The  thermal  capacities  of  the  bodies  mentioned  in  (6), 
however,  were  so  small,  as  compared  with  the  capacities  of  the  blocks,  that  the  effect 
of  an  error  of  1  to  5  per  cent,  in  their  valuation  would  fall  below  the  O'l  per  cent. 

referred  to. 

We  have,  however,  no  reason  to  suspect  that  errors  approaching  such  limits  exist 
in  any  of  the  measurements  above  enumerated. 


SECTION  III. 
Measurement  of  Temperature. 

The  platinum  thermometers  were  of  the  standard  form,  thick  platinum  leads  and 
compensators  connecting  the  coil  with  the  heads.  All  connections,  both  to  the 
thermometers  and  the  bridge,  were  made  by  means  of  small  cups  hard  soldered  to  the 
ends  of  the  leads  and  containing  a  fusible  metal  which  expanded  on  solidification. 
The  electrical  connection  thus  formed  was  a  perfect  one  and  easily  disconnected  and 
re-made. 

In  our  earlier  experiments  two  thermometers,  labelled  AB  and  CD,  were  used.  The 
constants  of  these  thermometers  have  been  previously  published,  and  as  far  as  we 
can  detect,  show  no  signs  of  change  over  a  lapse  of  1 5  years. 

Their  resistance  was  ascertained  by  means  of  a  Callendar  and  Griffiths  "  self- 
testing  "  bridge,*  containing  bare  Pt-Ag  coils  immersed  in  rapidly  stirred  oil. 

Thus,  the  temperature  of  the  coils  could  be  ascertained  with  great  accuracy. 

The  bridge  was  carefully  calibrated  at  the  beginning  of  this  work  and  all  its  coils 
and  bridge  wire  divisions  expressed  in  terms  of  the  mean  box  unit ;  the  absolute  value 
of  which,  for  the  purposes  of  temperature  measurements,  was  of  no  consequence. 

The  slight  inequality  (but  27  parts  in  1,000,000)  of  the  "  equal  arms"  (s,  and  s2) 
was  ascertained  in  the  usual  manner  by  observations  of  the  apparent  alteration  in  the 
resistance  of  a  platinum  thermometer  immersed  in  ice,  caused  by  exchanging  the 
positions  of  s,  and  s.j. 

The  resulting  correction  has  been  applied  to  all  our  measurements  of  resistance 
taken  with  this  box. 

All  the  precautions  previously  published  by  one  of  us  were  observed,  and  we  do  not 

*  Hereafter  referred  to  as  "  Box  A."  This  bridge  wan  last  used  in  1900,  and  it  was  then  observed  that 
one  of  iU  larger  coila  was  showing  signs  of  change.  That  coil  was  replaced  by  another  one,  and  hence  a 
rccalibration  of  the  whole  bridge  was  necessary. 


CAPACITY    KOI;    IIKAT   (»!•'    MKTAF.S    AT    I 'IFFKKKNT   TKM  I'KKAT!   I;KS. 


127 


tliink  it  necessary  to  encumber  the  paper  with  a  full  table  of  the  results.  By  the 
introduction  of  the  new  coil,  the  mean  bridge  unit  (approximately  Ti0  of  an  ohm) 
suffered  alteration.  Hence  the  values  of  R,  and  R,,  for  AB  and  CD  differ  somewhat 
from  those  previously  published.  The  alteration,  however,  is  in  the  unit  employed, 
rather  than  in  the  thermometers  themselves,  and  the  value  of  R|/R0  and  $  may  be 
regarded  as  unchanged. 

One  addition  to  the  bridge,  however,  is  worthy  of  mention,  as  it  may  be  found 
useful  in  other  cases.  To  obtain  good  contact  by  means  of  plugs,  considerable  pressure 
lias  to  be  exerted.  As  the  insulating  surface  holding  the 
brasses  (in  this  case  marble)  is  always  somewhat  yielding,  the 
tendency  of  the  brasses  is  to  gape  and  thus  contact  is  only 
made  round  a  small  horizontal  section  of  the  plug. 

We  therefore  affixed  to  each  pair  of  brasses  an  additional 
contact  maker  of  the  kind  shown  in  fig.  2.  The  spring  of 
the  strip  AB  caused  the  wedge  fastened  on  its  lower  surface 
to  spring  clear  of  its  twin  wedge  on  the  block  C  when  the 
screw-head  E  was  sufficiently  raised.  The  upright  holding 
the  screw  passed  through  a  slot  in  the  strip  without  making 
contact  therewith.  The  plug  being  firmly  inserted  in  its  hole, 
the  head  E  was  tightly  screwed  down ;  thus  the  wedge 
surfaces  were  firmly  pressed  together,  and  that  with  a  sliding 
movement.  The  strain  on  the  insulating  surface  was  thus 
relieved,  excellent  contact  was  made  by  the  wedge  surfaces, 
also  by  the  screw  E  connecting  the  strip  with  C  and  also  by 
the  plug  itself.  By  this  arrangement  consistent  results  were  obtained  and  one  of  the 
troubles  of  exact  resistance  measurements  eliminated. 

The  constants  of  AB  and  CD  were  found  to  be  as  follows  : — 


Fit 


Thermometer. 

V 

B. 

AB 
CD 

2449-201 
2449-044 

1763-279 
1763-308 

The  difference  at  100°  C.  resulting  from  the  separate  standardisations  is  therefore 
AB-CD=  +0-157. 

The  thermometers  were  then  coupled  up  differentially  and  together  immersed  in  the 
hypsometer.  The  differential  reading  was  then  found  to  be  +0'158. 

'  The  barometer  used  when  observing  R!  was  one  whose  scale  coefficients,  &c.,  had  been  determined  by 
companion  with  a  French  Standard  of  the  Bureau  International  in  1896.  Owing  to  an  accident  we  had 
to  refill  it  prior  to  this  work  :  this  was  done  with  all  the  usual  precautions. 


I-J" 


DR.    K.   II   GRIFFITHS  AND   MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON   THE 


In  the  same  manner  when  in  ice  : — 


Difference  when  determined  separately 
Difference  when  determined  differentially 


+  0'028. 
+  0'027. 


In  the  course  of  such  a  comparison,  eight  connections  had  to  be  undone,  re-made 
separately  in  sets  of  four,  and  then  replaced  in  the  first  position  .i.e.,  12  removals  ;m<l 
replacements.  In  the  one  case,  a  large  number  of  the  box  coils  were  in  use  ;  in  the 
other,  the  bridge  wire  only.  The  identity  of  the  results  is  sufficient  proof  of  the 
accuracy  of  the  methods  employed.  These  thermometer  coils  were  surrounded  by 
very  thin  walled  tubes  of  Jena  glass  which  fitted  closely  into  the  holes  in  their 
rwpective  blocks  and  thermal  connection  between  these  tubes  and  the  surrounding 
walls  was  assisted  by  a  thin  film  of  oil  of  known  weight. 

Although  the  observations  with  AB  and  CD  appeared  satisfactory,  it  was  decided, 
after  a  considerable  number  of  determinations  of  specific  heats  had  been  made  by 
their  means,  to  alter  the  conditions  and  replace  them  by  two  other  thermometers 
labelled  AA  and  BB.  In  these,  the  platinum  leads  were  fused  through  glass  heads, 
while  the  protecting  tube  was  cut  off  just  above  the  top  of  the  coils,  leaving  about 
ij  cm.  to  2  cm.  of  glass  projecting  into  the  hole  in  the  metal  block.* 

These  thermometers  were  standardised  by  temporarily  surrounding  them  with  thin 
tubes  containing  sufficient  oil  to  completely  cover  their  coils,  as  we  proposed  to 
immerse  them  similarly  when  in  the  blocks.  We  afterwards  found,  however,  that 
the  effect  of  the  oil  was  to  increase,  rather  than  decrease,  the  temperature  "  lag." 
Their  coils  were  therefore  freed  from  any  traces  of  oil  by  washing  with  ether. 

Their  temperature  then  very  rapidly  responded  to  changes  of  temperature  in  the 
walls  of  their  cavities,  their  heat  capacity  being  very  small  as  compared  with  their 
The  constants  of  AA  and  BB  were  as  follows  : — 


areas. 


Thermometer. 

Ri. 

Bo. 

RI  -Ro- 

AA 

2582-983 

1863-367 

719-616 

BB 

2582-341 

1863-307 

719-034 

After  a  considerable  number  of  experiments  had  been  performed,  the  glass  head  of 
AA  was  fractured.  It  was  replaced  by  another  thermometer  of  the  same  type  which 
had  been  in  our  possession  for  the  last  13  years. 

Its  resistance,  however,  was  slightly  less  than  that  of  BB.  It  was  necessary, 
therefore,  to  reduce  the  latter  until  the  two  became  approximately  equal.  These 
thermometers  were  labelled  AA'  and  BB'.  Their  constants  were  :— 

'  The  tube*  being  wrapped  round  with  threads  of  asbestos  to  prevent  the  passage  of  convection  currents 
from  the  canty. 


CAPACITY   FOK   HEAT  OF   MKT.M.S   AT   DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES. 


I  '_'!• 


Thermometer. 

IM. 

Ro. 

Ri-Ro- 

8.« 

AA' 
BB' 

2576-422 
2576-984 

1859-579 
1860-052 

716-843 
716-932 

1-50 

It  may  here  be  stated  that  the  results  deduced  from  experiments  performed  with 
different  pairs  of  thermometers  were  in  excellent  agreement,  and  afforded  strong 
evidence  of  the  accuracy  of  the  temperature  measurements. 

The  twin  thermometers  were  connected  in  the  usual  manner,  i.e.,  the  coil  of  the 
first  in  series  with  the  compensator  of  the  second  on  one  side  of  the  bridge,  the 
compensator  of  the  first  and  the  coil  of  the  second  being  placed  on  the  opposite  side. 

For  the  remaining  sides  of  the  bridge,  several  forms  of  approximately  equal  arms 
were  used.     All  our  later  experiments  were  performed  with  two  Pt-Ag  coils,  wound 
together  on  a  mica  rack  and  placed  in  a  brass  tube  containing  oil,  the  tube  itself  being . 
immersed  in  a  constant  temperature  tank.     Their  resistances  at  0°  C.  were 

S,  =  1533-618,         Sa  =  1533-685. 

Their  resistances  could  be  taken  separately,  and  were  determined  in  ice  and  also 
differentially,  both  at  0°  C.  and  at  higher  temperatures.  Their  continued  equality 
with  change  of  temperature  was  remarkable. 

The  galvanometer  contact  with  the  junction  of  S,  and  Sa  was  made  on  a  Pt-Ag  wire 
connecting  their  ends  and  situated  near  the  bridge  wire.  As  both  ends  of  the 
galvanometer  circuit  were  connected  with  similarly  situated  Pt-Ag  wires,  the 
magnitude  of  the  thermo-electric  effect  having  its  origin  in  these  contacts  was 
diminished.  The  Pt-Ag  wires  were  further  shielded  by  the  massive  casting  of  brass 
which  carried  the  contact  maker.  During  all  standardisations  and  experiments  the 
current  through  the  bridge  battery  circuit  was  maintained  at  0"013  ampere. 

Fig.  3  shows  the  general  arrangement  and  the  approximate  resistance  of  the 
various  arms  is  indicated  when  the  thermometers  are  at  0°  C.,  the  resistances  being 
so  arranged  as  to  give  nearly  the  maximum  sensitiveness  for  a  given  current. 

The  current  through  the  thermometer  coils  was  less  than  0'006  ampere ;  its  heating 
effect  was  so  small  that  it  could  be  disregarded,  both  thermometers  and,  therefore, 
both  blocks  of  metal  being  equally  affected. 

The  battery  key  was  of  the  type  described  in  '  Phil.  Trans.,'  vol.  184,  p.  398,  and 
re-established  the  galvanometer  circuit  after  the  battery  one  was  broken.  Hence,  the 

*  The  value  of  8  was  determined  in  the  vapour  of  boiling  aniline  (184° -13  C.),  as  the  resistance  of 
thermometer  AA'  in  sulphur  vapour  would  have  exceeded  the  total  range  of  our  standard  marble  top  box  A. 
The  value  of  6  was  of  secondary  importance,  as  we  were  concerned  only  with  the  value  of  d6/dpt  at  vaiioiu 
tank  temperatures. 

VOL.  CCXIH. — A.  8 


130 


DR.   E.   H.  GRIFFITHS  AND   MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON   THE 


position  of  the  galvanometer  spot  when  the  battery  was  disconnected  was  that  due 
to  any  thermo-electric  currents  existing  in  the  bridge  and  its  connections,  and  thus 
any  movement  viable  on  establishing  the  battery  circuit  was  attributable  to  that 
circuit  only.  The  key,  however,  presented  some  novel  features.  Brass  segments  were 


Pt-Ag 


r-~ 

Pt-Ag 

Fig.  3. 

fixed  on  a  vertical  spindle  in  such  a  manner  that  when  the  pointer  was  at  0,  the 
galvanometer  circuit  alone  was  complete,  when  rotated  through  120°  both  galvano- 
meter and  battery  circuit  were  established,  and  on  a  further  rotation  through  120° 
the  battery  was  reversed.  The  segments  were  so  devised  that  induced  currents 
during  the  "  makes  "  and  "  breaks  "  would  not  affect  the  galvanometer.  The  whole 
series  of  operations  could  thus  be  performed  very  rapidly  by  one  turn  of  the  spindle. 

The  galvanometer  was  one  of  the  original  Paschen  type.  Its  four  coils  were  wound 
with  wire  whose  diameters  increased  with  their  distance  from  the  centre. 

Four  coils,  each  of  about  5  ohms  and  separately  adjustable,  were  used.  It  was 
desirable  for  the  present  work  to  obtain  a  system  whose  period  of  oscillation  would  be 
small,  which  would  rapidly  settle  to  its  final  position  and  yet  have  great  sensitiveness. 

For  such  a  purpose  it  is  advisable  to  use  a  system  whose  moment  of  inertia  is 
reduced  as  far  as  possible.  The  type,  constructed  by  ourselves,  consisted  of  two 
groups,  each  containing  18  magnets  astatically  arranged.  The  extreme  length  of 
the  longer  magnets  was  about  1  ^  mm.  The  whole  system,  together  with  the  mirror 
and  the  connecting  glass  fibre,  weighed  less  than  11  mgf.  It  was  suspended  by  a 
quartz  thread  about  17  cm.  long  and  between  3  and  4  /x  diameter.  The  clearance 
allowed  by  the  ovals  in  the  coils  was  but  a  fraction  of  a  millimetre  and  the  faces  of 
the  coils  were  almost  in  contact,  these  faces  being  coated  with  tinfoil,  to  promote 
the  damping  of  the  oscillations  by  electro-magnetic  induction.  Reckoned  on  the 
usual  scale,  the  sensitiveness  of  this  galvanometer  could  have  been  easily  raised 
beyond  10"1",  but  by  exterior  magnetic  control  we  reduced  it  until  by  one  reversal  of 
battery  a  deflection  of  1  mm.  indicated  about  1B[j,00°  Pt  as  we  found  that,  owing  to 
the  wandering  of  the  zero  point,  a  higher  degree  of  sensitiveness  detracted  from, 
rather  than  increased,  the  accuracy  of  our  observations. 

The   galvanometer  had  to  be  placed   at  a  considerable  distance   (about   13  m.) 


CAPACITY  FOR  HEAT  OF   METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.          131 

from  the  tank,  as,  if  nearer,  it  responded  to  the  Hashing  on  and  off  of  the  heating 
lamps,  the  changes  in  the  magnetic  system  of  the  chronograph,  &c.  It  stood  on  the 
top  of  a  massive  pillar  of  masonry  which  passed  through  the  laboratory  floor  without 
contact,  and  whose  foundations  were  embedded  deeply  below  the  base  of  an  under- 
ground rhamlx-r.  Tlu-  traffic  in  ( 'anliil' is  heavy,  but  by  taking  special  precautions, 
the  galvanometer  in  these  circumstances  was  but  little  affected.  We  found  it 
necessary,  however,  carefully  to  guard  the  system  against  convection  currents. 
Every  small  opening  near  the  suspension  was  blocked  with  slips  of  mica,  and  the 
whole  galvanometer  was  enclosed  within  two  separate  chambers.  Many  of  the 
oscillations  usually  attributed  to  earth  vibrations  are,  we  believe,  due  to  insufficient 
attention  to  the  effect  of  convection  currents. 

As  all  our  temperature  measurements  were  observed  in  terms  of  lengths  of  the 
bridge  wire,  it  is  evident  that  the  accuracy  obtainable  was  dependent  upon  the  accuracy 
of  the  calibration  of  that  wire.  We  have  notes  of  a  calibration  made  some  14  years 
ago.  Before  these  observations  were  begun  a  careful  re-calibration  was  made  in  terms 
of  the  "mean  unit"  of  the  marble-top  box  (A)  previously  referred  to.  The  d'Arsonal 
galvanometer  used  on  that  occasion,  however,  was  not  sufficiently  sensitive  to  enable 
the  determination  of  the  smaller  inequalities. 

The  calibration  was  made  in  terms  of  3  coils  in  Box  A,  of  the  approximate  value  of 
1,  5,  and  10  hundredths  of  an  ohm.  Near  the  conclusion  of  our  present  work,  a  very 
careful  re-calibration  was  conducted,  with  the  object  of  ascertaining  the  accuracy  of 
the  earlier  one  and  also  of  ascertaining  if  the  bridge  wire  had  suffered  any  alteration 
through  use.  The  Paschen  galvanometer  was  employed ;  two  separate  and  inde- 
pendent calibrations  were  conducted  by  the  two  observers  and  the  results  were  in 
remarkable  agreement. 

It  appeared  that  the  calibration  over  the  longer  intervals  on  the  former  occasion 
was  correct,  thus  showing  that  the  wire  had  not  suffered  in  the  interval. 

Each  unit  of  the  wire  was  then  expressed  in  terms  of  a  "  mean  Box  A  unit "  (the 
same  \init  as  that  used  in  the  standardisation  of  the  thermometers),  and  a  table  was 
formed  showing  the  value  of  a  bridge  wire  unit  at  regular  intervals,  in  terms  of  one 
Pt  degree  of  each  pair  of  thermometers. 

It  should  here  be  stated  that  until  the  final  steps  in  the  reduction  of  our  results, 
all  temperatures  are  expressed  in  the  platinum  scale. 

SECTION  IV. 
Resistance  of  Heating  Coil. 

Our  methods  of  reduction  demanded  a  knowledge  of  R  under  the  actual  conditions 
prevailing  during  an  experiment.  As  it  was  impracticable  to  stir  the  oil  in  which  the 
coil  was  immersed,  a  wire  of  small  temperature  coefficient  was  chosen  to  reduce  to  its 
smallest  limits  the  correction  for  the  heating  effect  of  the  current  on  the  wire. 

8  2 


132  I>R   E.   H.  ORIFFITHS  AND  MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 

For  preliminary  experiments  a  10-ohm  coil  of  constantan  wire  was  used,  but  was 
replaced  in  the  final  form  of  apparatus  by  a  20-ohm  coil  of  bare  manganin  wire,  as  it 
was  essential  to  eliminate,  as  far  as  possible,  sources  of  thermo-electric  forces  in  the 
potential  circuit. 

The  diameter  of  the  circle  in  which  the  wire  was  formed  was  approximately  7  mm.  ; 
the  number  of  turns  being  59.  The  upper  end  of  the  wire  coil  was  situated  about 
20  mm.  below  the  surface  of  the  block  ;  two  straight  manganin  leads  (l  mm.  diameter) 
projecting  from  the  coil  terminated  at  their  upper  extremities  at  the  junctions  with 
the  current  and  potential  leads. 

Both  potential  and  current  leads  were  of  manganin,  the  latter  being  1  mm. 
diameter,  and  to  further  diminish  the  heating  effect  of  the  current,  two  leads  were 
connected  in  parallel.  Thus  six  leads  extended  up  the  central  quartz  tube  to  a 
distance  of  30  cm.  These  leads  were  insulated  by  perforated  mica  discs.  A  solid  wad 
of  such  discs  was  fixed  between  the  top  of  the  rack  and  the  junctions  to  the  current 
and  potential  leads,  in  order  to  diminish  the  passage  for  convection  currents. 

As  the  resistance  of  the  coil  had  to  be  observed  in  situ  at  each  temperature  and  at 
frequent  intervals,  four  brass  cups,  amalgamated  inside  and  containing  mercury,  were 
soldered  on  the  current  and  potential  leads  outside  the  apparatus  ;  plugs  enabled  us 
to  isolate  these  circuits,  when  a  resistance  had  to  be  taken,  from  the  various 
connections  to  battery,  &c.  Heavy  leads  from  a  dial  resistance  box  terminated  in  a 
pair  of  brass  cups  alongside  those  above  referred  to. 
If 

R  be  resistance  of  coil, 
r,  and  ra  „          „          „  current  leads, 

»a  and  r4  „          „          „  potential  leads  from  cups  to  coil, 
then,  if 


we  have 


N,  =  rl  +  r2, 
N<  =  r3+r4, 


As  the  absolute  value  of  R  was  required,  the  resistance  of  a  reference  heating  coil 

f  the  same  construction  and  about  the  same  value  as  the  one  used)  was  determined 

by  means  of  the  dial   box,  and   then   forwarded    to   the   National    Physical 

tory,  where  its  value  was  determined  in  international  ohms  ;  on  its  return  we 

d  our  previous  determination  by  the  dial  box. 

This  enabled  us  to  reduce  our  determinations  of  the  resistances  of  the  heating  coils 
used  in  the  work  to  international  ohms. 


CAPACITY   FOR  HEAT  OF   METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES. 


133 


RESISTANCE  OF  REFERENCE  COIL. 
National  Physical  laboratory  Report. 
(  'OIL  Immersed  in  Unstirred  Paraffin  Oil  cooled  to  0°  C. 


Resistance  in  international 
oh  ma.* 

Testing  current  through 
resistance. 

20-1360 
20-1362 
20-1370 

•mpere 
0-025 
0-060 

o-ioo 

Resistance  in  legal  ohms  in 
terms  of  our  dial  box. 

Testing  current  through 
resistance. 

20-2010 

ampere 

o-ooi 

Hence,  the  factor  to  convert  our  box  readings  to  international  ohms  =  0'99G78. 
As  the  same  ratio  arms  and  plugs  in  the  thousand  and  hundred  dials  were  used  in 
the  determination  of  both  coils,  any  change  in  the  relative  values  of  the  dial  box 

20-65 


20-64 


20-65 


Temjo» 

10°       20°       50°      40°       505      60*       10^       So3       so5      wcT    uo° 
Fig.  4.     Variation  of  resistance  of  heating  coil  with  temperature  and  time. 

Curve  ABC,  July  18  to  October  26,  1912. 
„  EF,  December  4  „  December  30,  1912. 
„  GHK,  January  19  „  February  10,  1913. 

LM,  February  17  „          „         19,  1913. 

NO,  23  „  March  2,  1913. 


i.v 


since  calibration  ('  Phil.  Trans.,'  vol.  184,  p.  409)  would  not  appreciably  affect  OUF 
results.  Fig.  4  shows  the  variation  with  temperature  of  the  heating  coil  and  the 
permanent  change  by  use  and  exposure  to  temperatures  of  about  100°  C. 


"  Probable  error  of  resistance  values  is  not  greater  than  2  parts  in  100,000." 


,„;    ,.;.    ||.   <;i;imTHS   AND   MR.   EZKR  GRIFFITHS  ON   THE 

The  value  of  R  so  determined  requires  a  small  correction,  as  it  includes  the  entire 
resistance  of  the  two  straight  leads,  previously  mentioned,  connecting  the  upper  ends 
of  the  coil  with  the  potential  junctions. 

Of  the  heat  generated  in  these  leads,  a  portion  is  lost  by  radiation,  &c.,  owing  to 
their  projecting  24  mm.  above  the  surface  of  the  oil. 

The  resistance  of  the  leads  could  not  be  diminished  beyond  a  certain  limit,  on 
account  of  thermal  conduction  along  them  of  the  heat  from  the  hot  oil.  A  diameter 
of  1  mm.  was  decided  upon,  as  the  thermal  conductivity  of  a  manganin  wire  of  this 
size  would  be  negligibly  small. 

A  certain  amount  of  heat  was  developed  in  these  short  leads  by  the  current. 
That  generated  in  the  20  mm.  below  the  surface  of  the  oil  would  undoubtedly  be 
absorbed  by  the  oil.  Of  the  heat  generated  in  the  24  mm.  above  the  oil-surface,  it  is 
probab'e  that  about  one-half  would  pass  into  the  block,  &c.,  by  conduction  and  by 
radiation  to  the  ferrules  and  quartz  tubes. 

Taking  the  actual  figures  :  —  Resistance  per  millimetre  of  the  wire  =  0  '000642. 
Hence,  resistance  of  portion  above  the  oil  surface  =  0'0154  ohm. 

On  the  above  assumption  only  the  heat  generated  in  half  of  this  was,  in  the  case 
of  either  lead,  effective  in  heating  the  block.  We  confess  that  this  is  merely  an 
assumption,  but,  with  our  knowledge  of  the  actual  conditions,  it  appears  to  be  a 
reasonable  one  ;  moreover  an  error  of  10  per  cent,  therein  would  only  affect  the 
absolute  value  of  our  results  by  less  than  1  part  in  10,000. 

Change  of  Resistance  due  to  Change  in  the  Current. 

If  R'  is  the  resistance  of  the  heating  coil  when  a  certain  current  (defined  later)  is 
passing  through  it  and  R  is  the  value  determined  in  the  usual  manner  by  the  dial 
resistance  box,  then  we  define  SE,  by  the  relation 


The  effect  of  the  temperature  rise  (produced  by  the  heating  current)  on  the 
resistance  of  the  wire  was  of  course  very  small  in  the  case  of  an  alloy  like  manganin  ; 
the  resulting  correction,  however,  could  be  determined  with  considerable  accuracy  in 
the  following  manner  (see  fig.  5). 

A  series  of  observations  was  made  in  which  the  current  was  measured  by  the 
ordinary  potentiometer  method.  Included  in  the  circuit  was  a  3-ohm  coil  (  W)  of  bare 
manganin  wire  immersed  in  stirred  paraffin  oil.  It  consisted  of  4  strands  of  0'4  mm. 
diameter,  in  parallel,  wound  on  eight  projecting  mica  plates  fixed  longitudinally  on  a 
wooden  drum.  The  passage  of  the  maximum  current  (0'45  ampere)  for  intervals  of 
several  minutes  did  not  produce  any  appreciable  change  in  the  temperature  of  the  oil. 

One  observer  adjusted  the  current  in  the  circuit  until  the  potential  difference  at 


CAPACITY    Foi;    IIKAT   OF    MKTAI.S    AT    IMFFKKKNT   TKMPKIIATMJKS. 


135 


t  lie  i-mls  i  .f   tin-    liriiting  roil     I!'  was  lial.'inrril    a^iinst     tliat    «\'  :i   mi!iil«T    <>('  <-:i<liiiimn 

cells,  as  in  the  ordinary  method  of  experiment. 

Tin-  siTuinl  nlisiT\  IT  inr.-isiin-il  tin-  [Hitrntiiil  dill'Ti-iK'c  ;il  tln-i-iids  of  tin-  :;  olmi 
coil,  by  means  of  a  Thomson-Varley  potentiometer  (P),  the  readings  being  taken  to 
about  1  part  in  50,000,  by  interpolation  by  galvanometer  swings. 


Jin 


R'. 
W. 

P. 
S  and  8'. 

B. 
Cd. 
GI. 
Gj. 


Fig.  5. 

Heating  coil  in  metal  block. 

Manganin  coil  (about  3  ohm)  immersed  in  oil. 

Thomson- Varley  potentiometer. 

Rheostats  to  adjust  current. 

Main  storage  battery. 

Standard  cells  balanced  at  ends  of  R'. 

High-resistance  galvanometer. 

Paschen  galvanometer. 


Observations  were  taken  when  the  potential  difference  at  the  ends  of  the  heating 
coil  was  varied  in  steps  from  that  of  three  to  eight  standard  cadmium  cells.  The 
temperature  of  the  block  was  maintained  approximately  constant  by  cooling  with  the 
ether  tube. 

Calculation  o 


If  to  is  the  resistance  of  the  3-ohm  coil,  W,  and  the  current  in  the  circuit  is  caused  by 
a  potential  difference  of  nE  at  the  ends  of  the  heating  coil,  and  R'  is  the  resistance 


n 


136  DK.    K.   H     CKimTHS  AND  MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON   Till! 

of  the  heating  coil  for  that  value  of  the  current,  then 

r  _  nE 
R'' 

Potential  difference  at  the  ends  of  3-ohm  coil  is 

—  x  a 

If  Si,  *2,  ...,  *„  be  the  potentiometer  readings  corresponding  to  1,  2,  3,  4,  ..., 
number  of  Cd  cells  balanced  at  the  ends  of  the  heating  coil,  then 

•p 

SH  =  K  •  ^  x  a. ;  where  K  is  a  constant. 
R 

Hence, 


By  plotting  n3  horizontally — since  the  heating  effect  is  proportional  to  the  square 
of  the  electromotive  force — and  the  quantity  n/sB  vertically,  but  reduced  in  such  pro- 
portion that  for  n  =  0  it  is  unity,  we  get  the  relation  between  SB,,  the  increment  of 
resistance,  and  n3.  The  resulting  points  fall  (within  the  limits  of  experimental  error) 
on  the  straight  line,  <SR  =  ten*.  These  observations  were  repeated  when  the  tank 
temperatures  were  0°  C.  and  97°  C.,  and  for  both  the  copper  and  iron  blocks. 

In  the  locality  of  0°  C.  the  temperature  coefficient  of  manganin  is  positive,  as  shown 

by  the  relation 

At  0°  C.,  SR  =  0-0552n2. 

About  100°  C.  manganin  has  a  negative  coefficient  and  it  was  found  on  reducing 
the  results  that  SR  was  negative. 

At  97°  C.,  SR  =  -0'0586n2. 

These  equations  represent  the  extremes  of  SR  in  our  range,  for  at  intermediate 
temperatures,  owing  to  the  locus  of  R  being  concave  downwards,  the  factor  k  was 
smaller  and  vanished  altogether  between  50°  C.  and  60°  C. 

It  may  be  pointed  out  that  for  the  highest  rate  usually  employed,  viz.,  that  due  to 
8  cells,  the  correction  on  account  of  SR  amounted  to  only  3  parts  in  10,000,  corre- 
sponding to  a  temperature  change  in  the  wire  of  10°  C.  As  the  values  of  SR  at  both 
0°  C.  and  97°  C.  indicated  that  the  rise  in  temperature  of  the  wire  depended  on  n2  only 
and  was  independent  of  all  other  conditions,  we  could,  from  the  curve  giving  the 
relation  between  temperature  and  resistance,  calculate  the  relation  between  £R  and 
rt1  for  any  temperature  within  our  range. 

The  value  of  R  was  the  one  directly  determined  by  the  dial  box  when  the  heating 
effect  was  insignificant,  the  current  through  the  coil  being  in  that  case  0'0015 
ampere. 


CAPACITY  FOR   HEAT  OF   METALS   AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  137 


8l  •  ri"V  V. 


The  potential  difference  at  the  ends  of  the  heating  coil  was  always  balanced  against 
an  integral  number  of  standard  Weston  cells  in  series.  A  batch  of  25  cells  was 
constructed  for  use  in  this  investigation,  according  to  the  method  descril>ed  by 
G.  A.  HII.KTT  ("The  Construction  of  Standard  Cells,  &c.,"  'Physical  Review,' 
Vol.  XXXII.,  1911). 

The  glass  work  was  of  the  usual  H  form,  the  platinum  leads  not  being  sealed 
through  the  glass.  The  two  limits  extended  about  15  cm.  above  the  cross  tube,  and 
were  closed  by  corks  ;  through  these  corks  passed  the  electrodes  sheathed  by  capillary 
tubing,  the  fine  platinum  wires  projecting  5  mm.  beyond  the  sealed  ends. 

This  mode  of  construction  admits  of  the  cells  being  directly  immersed  in  water, 
with  the  limbs  projecting  about  7  cm.  above  the  surface. 

The  water  tank  containing  them  was  of  considerable  capacity  and  well  lagged,  the 
temperature  rarely  varying  by  one-fifth  of  a  degree  Centigrade  per  day. 

The  leads  from  the  cells  passed  to  a  switchboard  across  well  insulated  supports. 

The  cells  were  frequently  compared  by  means  of  a  Thomson-  Varley  potentiometer 
with  two  standard  Westou  cells  constructed  by  Mr.  F.  E.  SMITH  of  the  National 
Physical  Laboratory.  (We  take  this  opportunity  of  thanking  Mr.  F.  E.  SMITH  for 
presenting  us  with  these  cells.)  Table  I.  gives  the  values  of  the  cells  in  terms  of  the 
N.P.L.  standard.  All  our  results  are  expressed  in  terms  of  these  standards. 

From  an  examination  of  the  comparisons  at  various  times  during  the  course  of 
fifteen  months,  we  can  find  no  change  greater  than  that  which  might  be  attributed 
to  the  experimental  errors. 

TABLE  I. 

Temperature  17°  C. 
The  National  Physical  Laboratory  Standards  are  denoted  by  symbols  BC—  1,  BC—  2. 


No.  of  cell. 

E.M.F.  in 
international  volte.* 

No.  of  cell 

E.M.F.  in 
international  volts. 

BC-1 

•0184 

10 

1-0184 

BC-2 

•0184 

11 

1-0185 

1 

•0183 

12 

•0184 

3 

•0183 

13 

•0184 

4 

•0183 

14 

•0185 

5 

•0182 

15 

•0183 

6 

1-0183 

16 

•0183 

8 

1-0183 

17 

•0184 

9 

1-0184 

1  The  tables  used  in  the  reduction  of  the  ohiervations  express  the  E.M.F.  of  our  cells  in  terms  uf  the 
standards  correct  to  1  part  in  20,000. 

VOL.  OOXIII. — A.  T 


PR.    K.    II.   CKIFFITHS   AND   MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 

Statement  received  with  Weston  normal  cells  BO-1,  BC-2  :— 
"  E.M.F.  =  1'01830  international  volts  at  20°  C. 
T.-mperature  coefficient: — 

E,  =  Eao-0'0000406(<-20) -0-00000095  («-20)3+0'00000001  (/-20)3." 

While  an  experiment  was  in  progress,  the  current  in  the  heating  coil  was 
continually  adjusted  to  keep  the  balance  exact.  This  was  effected  by  two  rheostats 
in  parallel ;  the  shunt  being  of  fairly  high  resistance.  After  the  preliminary 
adjustment,  the  potential  balance  could  be  maintained  by  use  of  the  shunt  alone. 

The  sensibility  of  the  high  resistance  Thomson  galvanometer  (7000  ohms)  in  the 
standard  cell  circuit  was  such  that  a  deflection  of  1  mm.  on  the  galvanometer  scale 
corresponded  to  a  change  in  the  potential  difference  of  1  part  in  20,000. 

During  the  course  of  an  experiment,  the  potential  balance  could  be  maintained 
with  great  steadiness,  the  slight  oscillations  rarely  amounting  to  more  than  1  part 
in  10,000. 

SECTION  VI. 

Minor  Collections  for  the  Thermal  Capacity  of  Accessory  Substances. 

In  order  to  facilitate  transmission  of  heat  from  the  heating  coil  to  the  metal  block, 
the  central  hole  was,  as  previously  stated,  filled  at  low  temperatures  with  boiled 
paraffin  oil,  and  at  higher  temperatures  with  a  heavy  hydrocarbon. 

The  quantity  of  liquid  thus  inserted  varied  slightly  with  different  blocks,  the 
average  volume  being  about  7  c.c.  It  was  therefore  necessary  to  ascertain  the 
thermal  capacity  of  the  oils  and  their  approximate  variation  with  temperature. 

In  the  construction  of  the  apparatus  15 '06  gr.  of  alloy  were  used  in  fixing  the 
quartz  tubes  to  the  lid  of  the  copper  case  first  employed,  and  8'25  gr.  of  solder  in 
the  second  and  somewhat  heavier  lid. 

Again,  the  thermal  capacity  of  the  portions  of  the  glass  sheaths  of  the  thermo- 
meters which  entered  the  block  had  to  be  allowed  for;  the  mass  .thus  inserted 
amounted,  when  thermometer  CD  was  in  use,  to  3'1  gr.,  and,  in  the  case  of  AA  and 
AA',  to  T67  gr. 

Lastly,  allowance  had  to  be  made  for  the  heat  absorbed  by  the  lower  ends  of  the 
quartz  tubes  which  supported  the  apparatus.  This  was  a  most  difficult  correction  to 
determine,  as  it  was  not  possible,  (I  priori,  to  specify  what  mass  of  the  quartz  could 
be  regarded  as  raised  through  the  same  temperature  as  the  copper  lid. 

1.  Specific  Heat  of  Glass  and  Oil. 

The  mean  specific  heat  of  the  paraffin  oil  between  0°  C.  and  100°  C.  was  determined 
with  a  Bunsen's  calorimeter,  by  the  introduction  of  about  2'8  c.c.  of  oil  sealed  in  a  thin 
glass  bull). 


CAPACITY  FOR  HEAT  OF  METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  139 

Tim  mercury  drawn  into  the  Bunsen  was  directly  determined  from  the  loss  in  weight 
of  a  small  capsule  ;  in  the  first  experiment,  27347  gr.  of  mercury  ;  in  the  second 
experiment,  27335  gr.  of  mercury. 

The  constant  assumed  was  15'44  mgr.  mercury  per  calorie. 

The  resulting  value  of  the  mean  specific  heat  for  this  paraffin  was  0"491,  its  density 
l>eing  0'818. 

The  mean  specific  heat  of  glass  was  determined  in  a  similar  manner  and  was  found 
to  be  0'194. 

The  specific  heat  and  temperature  variation  of  the  hydrocarbon  oil  had  already  l)een 
determined  ('Phil.  Trans.,'  vol.  186,  p.  338),  viz.,  S,  =  0'466  +  0'0009£,  its  density 
being  0"865.  As  both  oils  were  paraffins,  the  temperature  coefficients  were  assumed 
to  lie  the  same,  to  a  first  approximation. 

2.  Alloy  and  Solder. 

The  alloy-fixed  lid  was  used  only  in  our  earlier  experiments  and  when  determining 
the  specific  heats  of  certain  metals  at  0°  C. 

The  mean  specific  heat  of  this  alloy  over  the  range  0°  C.  to  47° '6  C.  (its  melting 
point  being  97°  C.)  was  also  ascertained  by  the  Bunsen  calorimeter  and  was  found  to 
be  G'0348. 

The  soldered  lid  was  used  over  the  range  0°  C.  to  125°  C.,  hence,  both  its  specific 
heat  and  its  temperature  variations  were  required. 

A  block  of  the  sample  of  solder  (3  kgr.)  was  cast  and  machined  to  the  same  size  as 
the  other  metal  blocks.  Its  specific  heat  at  0°  C.  and  97°  C.  was  determined  in  our 
apparatus  in  the  same  manner  as  copper,  &c., 

S,  =  0*0422  +  0-000038*. 

On  analysis,  the  composition  of  the  block  was  found  to  be  537  per  cent,  tin  and 
46'0  per  cent,  lead,  with  bismuth  and  antimony  as  impurities.  The  density  of  the 
solder  block  was  8  "7  7.  The  platinum  deposit  on  the  ends  of  the  quartz  tubes  was 
negligible,  the  weight  of  three  coats  being  only  0"0105  gr. 

3.  Heat  Absorbed  by  the  Supporting  Quartz  Tubes. 

As  previously  indicated,  two  different  copper  lids  were  used.  The  copper  alone  in 
the  first  weighed  51  "6  gr.  and  thin  quartz  tubes  were  fixed  into  its  ferrules  (which 
were  15  mm.  in  depth)  by  fusible  alloy.  The  copper  alone  in  the  second  lid  weighed 
68 "5  gr.  ;  the  tubes  were  of  much  heavier  make  and  fixed  with  solder.  The  masses 
of  the  quartz  tubes  per  unit  length  in  the  first  lid  were  only  three-fifths  of  those 
used  in  the  second  ;  advantage  was  taken  of  this  difference  to  determine  the  effective 
capacity  for  heat  of  that  portion  of  the  quartz  which  might  be  regarded  as  rising 
through  the  same  range  as  the  block  of  metal 

T  2 


U0  I)K.    F,    H.   «1MFFITHS   AND   MR.    FJ5ER  GRIFFITHS   OX   THE 

Two  series  of  experiments  with  copper  at  0°  C.  were  performed  under  precisely  the 
same  conditions,  except  that  the  lid  with  the  lighter  tubes  was  employed  in  the  first, 
and  that  \\ith  the  heavier,  in  the  second,  series. 

•ra  the  differences  in  the  capacity  for  heat  resulting  from  these  two  series,  the 
dim-rence  in  the  amount  which  had  passed  into  the  quartz  tubes  could  be  determined, 
the  capacity  of  the  alloy,  solder  and  copper,  being  known.  Let  m^,  and  m.^  be  the 
respective  quartz  capacities.  Then,  from  the  experimental  results  we  found 

ml»,  =  l'37;        T»A  -  2'28. 

No  doubt,  a  temperature  gradient  existed  along  these  tubes,  but  the  value  of  sm 
thus  obtained  gave  the  "  effective"  capacity,  i.e.,  the  number  of  calories  which  flowed 
into  the  quartz  tubes  as  the  temperature  of  the  block  was  raised  by  1°  C. 

A  comparison  of  other  experiments  at  0°  C.,  where  the  conditions  were  similarly 
altered,  indicated  that  the  accuracy  of  this  "  quartz  correction  "  was  sufficient. 

4.  Heat  Absorbed  by  the  Air  Within  the  Brass  Vessel. 

As  stated  in  Section  II.  we  were  able  to  measure  the  average  increase  in  pressure, 
and  therefore  in  temperature,  of  this  air  during  an  experiment.  The  volume  being 
approximately  1500  c.c.,  the  average  rise  of  pressure  was  07  mm.  Hg,  indicating  an 
increase  of  temperature  of  0°'2G  C.  The  number  of  calories  thus  expended  equals 
0'08. 

As  the  average  heat  supply  during  an  experiment  was  about  400  calories,  it  is 
evident  that  this  correction  would  not  amount  to  more  than  1  part  in  5000  ;  we  did 
not  consider,  therefore,  that  the  accuracy  of  our  experiments  necessitated  the  inclusion 
of  this  correction,  especially  as  it  could  be  only  roughly  determined. 


SECTION  VII. 
Mass  and  Density  of  the  Metals. 

The  masses  of  the  blocks  varied  from  1  to  4  kgr.  The  balance  used  for  the  larger 
masses  was  capable  of  weighing  to  O'Ol  gr.  ;  masses  under  100  gr.  were  determined 
by  a  Verbeek  short-beam  balance.  The  method  of  double  weighing  was  used  and  a 
correction  was  applied  for  the  displaced  air. 

A  calibration  of  the  box  weights  proved  that,  relatively,  they  were  correct  to  a 
high  degree  of  accuracy;  as,  however,  the  absolute  values  were  required,  the  2  kilos. 
(from  another  box),  and  the  1  kilo,  and  100  gr.  from  this  box  were  forwarded  to  the 
National  Physical  Laboratory  for  standardisation.  The  kilogram  and  the  100  gr. 
weights  of  our  box  were  found  to  be  exact  and  the  correction  on  the  2  kilos  was 
given  as  +  0'29  gr. 


CAPACITY  FOR  HEAT  OF  METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  141 

Densiti**. 

The  densities  of  the  metuls  were  found  by  weighing  in  air  and  water,  the  usual 
precautions  being  observed.  The  values  were  checked  by  calculation  from  the 
dimensions  and  weight. 

SECTION  VIII. 
Measurement  of  Time, 

The  only  records  made  during  the  course  of  an  experiment  were  the  times  of  transit 
of  the  temperature  of  the  thermometer  in  the  block  past  bridge-wire  divisions,  and  as 
these  were  effected  mechanically  by  the  depression  of  a  key,  the  observer's  attention 
could  be  concentrated  on  the  transits. 

The  time-recording  arrangements  may  be  briefly  described  as  follows  :— 

An  electrically  driven  seconds  pendulum  bob,  suspended  by  an  Invar  rod,  at  each 
swing  tilted  over  an  exhausted  tube  about  2  inches  long  by  ±-inch  diameter,  fixed  in 
a  frame  capable  of  oscillating  about  an  axis  perpendicular  to  the  length  of  the  tube. 

As  the  carriage  bearing  the  tube  was  unstable  about  this  axis,  a  slight  impulse 
sent  it  over  from  one  stop  to  the  other,  causing  a  small  mercury  pellet  to  run  down 
the  tube  and  make  momentary  connection  between  two  platinum  wires  fused  midway 
into  it,  thus  completing  the  electro-magnet  circuit  in  the  chronograph. 

A  series  of  equally  spaced  dots  about  2  cm.  apart  on  the  tape  indicated  seconds, 
while  the  marks  of  the  respective  observer's  keys  were  recorded  on  opposite  sides  of 
the  tape.  By  counting  and  measuring  the  fraction,  the  times  of  transit  could  be 

obtained  to  .2\^  second. 

Although  the  seconds  pendulum  kept  a  fairly  constant  rate— being  fitted  with  a 
cut-out  device  to  keep  its  amplitude  to  a  definite  limit — the  absolute  rate  was 
determined  for  each  experiment  by  comparison  with  a  rated  chronometer.* 

This  comparison  of  the  total  time  also  afforded  a  check  on  the  accuracy  of  the 
reading  of  the  tape,  always  a  somewhat  laborious  process,  the  lengths  of  tape  used 
varying  from  20  to  60  metres. 

SECTION  IX. 
Temperature  Control  of  tfie  Huthn. 

The  absolute  steadiness  of  the  bath  temperature  was  of  prime  importance,  as  our 
conclusions  were  based  on  the  assumption  that  the  temperature  of  the  walls 
surrounding  the  blocks  remained  constant  throughout  an  experiment. 

•  Wo  are  indebted  to  Mr.  T.  J.  Williams,  63,  Bute  Street,  Docks,  Cardiff,  for  the  loan  of  this 
chronometer,  and  for  kindly  checking  its  rate  from  time  to  time. 


142  DR.   E.   H.  GRIFFITHS   AND  MR.    EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON   THE 

When  the  values  of  the  specific  heat  at  0°  C.  were  required,  a  special  tank  of 

15  gallons  capacity  and  lagged  with  asphalt  was  used.     Two  screws— protected  by 
strong  metal  cages— caused  a  rapid  circulation  of  water  through  the  powdered  ice. 
For  work  at  higher  temperatures  this  tank  was  replaced  by  an  oil  or  water  bath,  of 
capacity  about  20  gallons,  the  heat  being  supplied  by  immersed  electric  radiator 

lamps. 

Some  difficulty  was  encountered  in  insulating  the  200-volt  leads  of  these  lamps 
when  the  tank-temperature  was  above  50°  C.,  owing  to  the  softening  of  the  stretched 
rubber  tubing  by  continued  exposure  to  hot  water.  The  cement  fastening  the  caps 
of  the  lamps  frequently  broke  down  and  entailed  the  loss  of  several  experiments. 

The  most  satisfactory  method  of  insulation  hitherto  tried  was  by  clipping  a 
discarded  motor  tyre  tube  over  the  end  of  the  "  radiator  "  lamp,  the  leads  being 
separated  within  the  tube  by  lengths  of  glass  tubing. 

The  "  lux "  lamps  used  for  the  purposes  of  fine  adjustment,  were  insulated  by 
fixing  glass  tubing  of  slightly  larger  diameter  over  their  ends,  the  joint  being  closed 
by  a  short  length  of  rubber  tubing  well  covered  with  adhesive  tape. 

JTiermostats. 

We  tried  a  considerable  variety  of  thermostats  which  proved  defective  from 
one  cause  or  another.  The  two  most  satisfactory  ones  may  be  briefly  described.  The 
first  was  composed  of  thin  solid-drawn  copper  piping  f  inch  internal  diameter  and 

16  feet  long. 

This  tube  was  wound  into  an  oval  spiral,  so  as  to  surround  the  two  brass  cases  in 
the  tank  (see  fig.  1).  Two  glass  tubes  were  soldered  into  reduction  pieces  at  each  end, 
one  terminating  in  a  tap,  the  other  in  a  U-tube  containing  mercury.  As  the  method 
of  constructing  these  soldered  joints  is  both  simple  and  effective,  we  have  given  in 
Appendix  III.  a  brief  description  of  the  process. 

Another  form  of  thermostat  used  in  a  considerable  number  of  determinations 
consisted  of  a  large  branchwork  of  glass  tubes  fused  together  and  so  distributed  as  to 
take  the  mean  temperature  of  the  tank.  The  thermostat  was  filled  with  toluol, 
which  however  proved  unsatisfactory  at  high  temperatures,  and  was  replaced  by 
commercial  aniline,  which  in  every  way  seems  to  be  a  suitable  liquid  for  thermostats. 
It  has  a  high  coefficient  of  expansion,  low  viscosity  and  a  high  boiling  point  (184°  C.). 

We  found  it  necessary  to  keep  the  tap  closing  the  thermostat  well  greased, 
otherwise  slow  leakage  and  consequent  drift  of  temperature  took  place.* 

The  motion  of  the  mercury  in  the  U-tube  operated  a  relay,  which  in  turn  switched 
on  and  off  the  lamps  in  the  tank.  Both  the  make  and  the  break  in  the  main  circuit 

>  We  have  some  reasons  for  suspecting  that,  owing  to  neglect  of  this  precaution,  the  temperature  of  the 
bath  was  not  maintained  with  its  accustomed  steadiness  during  some  of  the  group  of  observations  about 
67' C. 


CAPACITY  FOR  HEAT  OF   METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  143 

and  the  relay  circuit  had  a  pair  of  aluminium  plates  in  water  as  shunts,  to  diminish 
sparking. 

A  considerahle  fraction  of  the  heat  necessary  to  maintain  the  tank  at  the  required 
temperature  was  given  by  a  constant  supply,  while  the  relay  operated  the  fine 
adjustment. 

The  intermittent  lamps  were  placed  close  to  the  stirrer,  and  thus  the  whole 
arrangement  tended  to  keep  the  oscillations  of  the  temperature  within  narrow  limits. 
At  some  temperatures  we  had  thermometers  by  which  we  could  detect  changes 
«•('  -.00°  C.,  but  when  the  apparatus  was  working  satisfactorily  we  at  no  time  observed 
oscillations  of  this  magnitude. 

Another  circumstance  which  perhaps  assisted  in  diminishing  the  oscillations  was 
the  fact  that  the  stirring  was  sufficiently  vigorous  to  cause  a  continual  vibration  of 
the  U-tube  of  the  thermostat  and  so  prevent  any  adhesion  of  the  mercury  to  the 
platinum  point  which  established  connection  with  the  relay. 


SKCTION  X. 
(1)  The  Total  Heat  Method. 

The  metal  under  examination  was  cooled  to  a  temperature  lower  than  that  of  the 
tank  (00)  and  the  fall  being  observed  by  means  of  bridge-wire  olraervations,  it  was 
stopped  when  it  had  passed  below  the  range  of  the  bridge. 

The  contact-maker  was  then  set  at  a  certain  reading,  which,  for  clearness,  we  will 
specify  as  —9.*  Meanwhile,  the  "heating"  current  was  adjusted  on  an  auxiliary 
coil  enclosed  in  a  tube  containing  oil.  This  auxiliary  coil  was  a  duplicate  of  the 
coil  in  the  metal  block  and  the  change-over  from  the  one  to  the  other  could  be 
effected  by  the  depression  of  a  recording  key.  Before  the  transference  of  the  current, 
the  temperature  of  the  block  rose  very  slowly  by  radiation,  &c.,  and  could  be  followed 
by  the  gradual  approach  of  the  galvanometer  spot  to  its  zero  mark. 

The  rate  of  rise  was  of  the  order  of  0°'043G  Pt  per  second,  consequently  the 
temperature  throughout  the  block  was  practically  uniform. 

The  moment  the  temperature  had  reached  the  bridge  reading  —9,  as  indicated  by 
the  transit  of  the  spot  across  its  zero  mark,  the  heating  current  was  switched  over, 
the  keyt  at  the  same  time  recording  the  time  on  the  chronograph  tape.  A  slight 
readjustment  of  the  rheostat  was  usually  required  to  maintain  exact  potential  balance 
when  the  change-over  was  effected.  The  contact-maker  of  the  bridge  was  then  set 
at  the  next  integer,  —8  (the  temperature  interval  from  —9  to  —8  being  roughly 

*  This  was  the  customary  starting  point. 

t  The  key  was  so  constructed  that  any  time  lag  between  the  marking  of  the  tape  and  the  actual  switch 
on  was  compensated  for  during  the  operation  of  switching  off. 


U4  ,„..  E.  n.  (;RIFFITHS  AND  MR  EZER  GRIFFITHS  ox  THE 

,'4  I't),  .-.IK!  after  slight  adjustment*  of  the  galvanometer  spot  to  its  zero  mark,  the 
•  r1.llv..lM..iii.-i«T  k.-y  was  tunied  so  as  to  re-establish  the  bridge  current  (0'013  ampere). 

Tlie  rise  of  temperature,  as  indicated  by  the  movement  of  the  spot,  was  uniform, 
:md  its  transit  was  recorded  by  a  tap  on  the  chronograph  key.  The  cycle  of 
operations  was  repeated;  the  transits  of  the  temperature  across  each  bridge-wire 
nM<liiig  being  recorded  in  succession  until  the  temperature  had  risen  to  +8  bridge- 
wire  reading,  when  the  current  was  switched  over  to  the  auxiliary  coil. 

After  the  current  had  ceased  to  impart  any  heat  to  the  metal,  the  observed 
temperature  continued  to  rise,  on  account  of  excess  of  heat  in  the  oil,  the  gradient 
from  the  interior  to  the  surface  of  the  metal  and  the  temperature  lag  of  the  thermo- 
meter. 

The  metal  would,  however,  after  its  temperature  had  risen  to  a  maximum,  part 
with  its  heat  by  radiation,  &c.,  only,  the  resulting  fall  being  slow  and  regular.  This 
"  rise  above,"  as  we  termed  it,  could  be  accurately  determined  by  the  following 
procedure: — 

The  bridge  contact-maker  was  set  above  the  switching-off  point  by  an  amount  such 
that  the  galvanometer  spot  moved  to  near  the  centre  of  the  scale  before  the  regular 
cooling  l>egan.  The  galvanometer  deflections  on  reversal  of  the  bridge  current  were 
noted,  and  also  (on  the  chronograph  tape)  the  times  of  the  observations,  until  the 
deflections  had  increased  beyond  the  range  of  the  scale.  The  value  of  1  mm.  scale 
deflection  in  terms  of  a  bridge-wire  unit  being  known, f  the  rate  of  fall  in  temperature 
could  l)e  determined,  and  the  temperature  time-curve  P...  ABCD could  be  constructed. 

One  of  the  resulting  diagrams  for  the  "  rise  above"  is  shown  in  fig.  6. 

If  P  is  the  point  at  which  the  current  was  switched  off,  the  slope  of  the  line  CD,  i.e., 
the  rate  of  uniform  cooling,  gives  the  data  required  for  the  determination  of  the 
horizontal  line  EG,  and  thus  the  temperature  which  the  metal  would  have  attained,  in 
the  alwence  of  radiation,  &c. ,  can  be  ascertained. 

If  GE  l>e  produced  liackwards  to  meet  the  temperature  ordinate  at  F,  then  it  will 
be  evident  that  F  falls  on  DC  produced. 

Thus  PF,  the  rise  due  to  the  residual  heat  in  the  block,  could  be  determined  at  the 
close  of  each  experiment  with  considerable  accuracy.  The  value  rarely  exceeded 
0°'l  Pt  and  could  be  measured  to  1  part  in  1000,  that  is,  about  1  in  15,000  of  the 
whole  range. 

It  may  be  mentioned  that  the  "  rises  above  "  for  a  series  of  experiments  with  the 
same  metal  under  the  same  conditions  were  proportional  to  na,  i.e.,  to  the  rate  of  supply. 

The  galvanometer  system  generally  required  this  slight  readjustment  between  each  observation  of 
transit  in  order  to  maintain  the  spot  on  the  scale  zero  when  the  bridge  current  was  broken.  This  was 
effected  by  the  movement  of  a  small  subsidiary  control  magnet  on  the  table  by  the  observer,  and  about 
1 J  m.  distant  from  the  galvanometer.  The  changes  of  zero  were  chiefly  those  due  to  variations  in  the 
thermoelectric  effects  in  the  circuit,  and  with  considerable  attention  to  shielding  the  various  junctions  w 
succeeded  in  diminishing  such  changes  to  small  dimensions,  but  could  not  altogether  eliminate  them. 
t  Ascertained  for  each  get  of  experiments. 


we 


CAPACITY  FOR  HEAT  OF   METALS  AT   DIKKKKKNT   TKMPERATURES. 


145 


We  may  hen;  point  out  that  the  two  fundamental  observations  which  determined 
the  temperature  range  were  taken  when  tin-  temperature  of  the  metal  was  steady  and 
practically  uniform,  the  only  ch.-mgr  taking  place  being  that  due  to  the  very  small 
rate  of  rise  or  fall  consequent  on  radiation,  &c. 


•010' 

•005' 
ei 

r 

j                                                  ° 

X 

.' 

.»•• 

i* 

••    1 

• 

X 

N 

N 

/ 

X 

• 

k^ 

Sj 

j 

J 

| 

j 

|C 

,1}, 

•^s 

r-.  -•-., 

1 

» 

v- 

s> 

N 

\, 

ni 

• 

1  , 

ft«r  » 

RB 

x 

:  a 

•' 

o' 

. 

,- 

•fa 

t,    :. 

ct 

l( 

M;V 

i) 

• 

la 

,-. 
,-.'m 

trk 

t 

K'- 

^ 

') 

^ 

... 

i 

5 

t 

r,, 

0 

:,«> 

M 

•<, 

I 

\ 

X 

5 

.41 

a 

Of 

Ah 

m 

ICil 

H 

Mi 

n 

i  I 
i  D 

V.  « 

J.  - 

•  l> 
J.n 

>1IJ 

tm 

tH 

sr- 

\, 

I 

006- 

- 

f-- 

«H 

Mi 

\  UN 

.': 

•  • 

N 

V 

"i 

S 

i 

V 

V 

\  li 

""  1) 

A 

Bbi 

ii 

00 

ser 

w*C 

•r 

N 

1 

E 

G. 

A 

DM 

i 

set 

M 

to 

r 

ii 

.•-. 

X 

010° 

5 

X 

Fig.  6.     "Rise  above"  for  Experiment  IV.,  June  2,  1912  (7  standard  cells). 

We  have  next  to  consider  any  other  necessary  correction  for  the  effect  of  radiation 
during  an  experiment.  When  the  current  was  established  at  —9  bridge- wire  reading, 
the  oil  had  first  to  rise  in  temperature,  then  a  gradient  established  from  centre  to 
surface  of  block  and,  when  the  temperature  began  to  rise,  the  thermometer  would 
undoubtedly  lag  behind  the  temperature  of  the  surrounding  walls. 

For  these  reasons,  the  time  of  rising  through  the  first  bridge-wire  division  would 
considerably  exceed  the  times  of  passing  over  succeeding  equal  divisions. 

It  was  found  that  when  the  temperature  had  reached  the  end  of  the  first  bridge- 
wire  division,  the  conditions  had  become  practically  steady,  as  shown  by  the  fact  that 
in  subsidiary  experiments  in  which  the  current  was  switched  off  at  the  end  of  the 
first  bridge-wire  division,  the  "  rise  above  "  was  found  to  be  very  nearly  the  same  as 
when  the  experiments  were  completed  in  the  customary  manner. 

We  also  investigated,  with  the  smaller  currents,  the  curve  showing  the  rate  of  rise 
of  the  thermometer  throughout  this  first  interval  and  it  appeared  that,  during  the 
first  hah0  of  the  time  of  passing  through  the  interval,  the  thermometer  only  rose  from 
—  9  to  —87  bridge-wire.  Consequently,  this  reading  —87  bridge-wire  may  be  regarded 
as  approximately  the  mean  temperature  throughout  the  time  of  the  first  interval 

VOL.  CCXJII. — A.  U 


U ,-,  hi;    K.    II     iiKIFFlTHS  AND   MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON   THK 

Tlie  temperature  ranges  above  and  below  00  were  so  selected  that,  excluding  the 
first  interval,  the  two  ranges  were  equal  and  as  they  were  small  (about  0°'6  C.),  the 
times  over  these  ranges  were  so  near  equality  that  the  losses  and  gains  due  to  radiation 
illicit  be  neglected.*  Hence,  the  only  radiation  correction  required  was  that  which 
expressed  the  heat  thus  received  as  the  metal  rose  through  the  first  bridge-wire 
interval.  The  true  time,  however,  over  that  interval  was  less  than  the  time  recorded 
between  the  switching  on  the  current  and  the  first  transit,  owing  to  the  causes  of  lag 
above  referred  to.  As  this  lag  was  known  in  terms  of  temperature,  by  the  "  rise 
above,"  it  was  possible  to  obtain  from  it  an  expression  involving  time. 
If 

0,  is  the  "  rise  above  "  in  degrees  Pt, 

<,  =  the  average  time  of  rising  through  1°  Pt  when  the  temperature  of  the  block 
is  rising  steadily  on  account  of  the  heating  current, 

then  6,  x  £,  would  be  the  approximate  time,  at  any  part  of  the  range,  of  moving  through 
the  "  rise  above  " ;  this  we  term  the  "  time  lag  "  =  T. 

T  was  found  to  be  practically  the  same  for  all  rates  of  heating  for  the  same  metal. 
For  example,  in  the  case  of  copper,  36  seconds ;  of  silver,  40  seconds. 

Hence,  the  actual  time  over  the  first  interval  was  equal  to  the  observed  time 
diminished  by  T. 

The  rate  of  rise  per  second  due  to  radiation  alone  was  obtained  by  two  distinct 
methods,  namely : — 

I.  By  subsidiary  experiments  in  which  rate  of  rise  due  to  radiation  alone  over  the 

range  —9  to  —8  was  observed  ; 

II.  From  the  observations  of  the  transits  taken  during  the  actual  experiment  when 

the  conditions  were  settled. 

For,  if 

M  =  mass  of  the  substance, 
S  =  specific  heat  a,t  #0, 

ms  =  thermal  capacity  of  oil,  copper  case,  &c., 
.7  =  rate  of  rise  due  to  radiation  alone  for  a  difference  of  1°  Pt  between  the 

block  and  the  surroundings, 
t  =  time  in  seconds, 
E  =  E.M.F.  of  a  standard  Weston  cell, 
n  =  number  of  cells  balanced, 

R  =  resistance  at  this  temperature  corrected  for  heating  effect  of  the  current, 

In  a  previous  communication  (•  Phil.  Trans.,'  vol.  184,  p.  500)  it  was  shown  that  if  f,  is  the  time  of 

iny  temperature  below  that  of  the  tank,  and  (,  is  the  time  from  the  lower  temperature 

time  ^+t  '  the  8Um  °f  ^  1088e8  and  ^  dUC  to  radiati°"'  &c"  is 

' the  error  due  to  the  assumption  that  the 


CAPACITY   FOR  HEAT  OF   METALS   AT  DIFFERENT  TKMPKRATURES. 


147 


and 


de\  #,_ 

/ur 


JR(MS+ww) 

(»E)» 
JR(MS+nw) 


-#)=(%}  -(% 

\dtUt     \dt 


Hence 


The  table  below  shows  the  values  of  <r  deduced  from  the  two  methods,  and  their 
agreement  affords  strong  evidence  of  the  accuracy  of  the  resulting  correction. 


Metal. 

Method  I. 

Method  II. 

Silver     

0-000078 

0-000079 

Copper    . 

0-000057 

0-000053 

Cadmium     

0-000093 

0-000096 

Hence,  if  0,  is  the  range  below  6a,  corrected  for  radiation,  and  0a  the  range  above  00, 
and  6,  the  "  rise  above  "  after  correction  for  radiation,  then 

nrE?t 
JR 

Table  II.  (p.  148)  represents  a  typical  series  of  experiments  by  the  "total  heat" 
method,  the  metal  being  copper  at  0°  C.,  and  the  thermometers  AB  and  CD. 


(2)  The  Intersection  Method. 

The  metal  having  been  cooled  a  considerable  distance  beyond  the  limits  of  the 
bridge,  the  current  and  potential  balance  were  established  from  five  to  ten  minutes 
before  the  temperature  came  within  the  bridge  range.  This  preliminary  heating  up 
under  the  normal  conditions  of  the  experiment  was  essential,  as  it  ensured  a  steady 
state  of  gradient,  lag,  &c.,  being  established  before  the  commencement  of  the 
observations.  The  time  of  transit  of  the  temperature  across  each  bridge  wire  division 
was  recorded  on  the  chronograph  tape,  as  in  the  "  total  heat "  experiments. 

The  current  was  switched  off  and  the  "  rise  above "  taken  in  the  usual  way. 
Similar  experiments  over  the  same  range  were  performed  with  various  values  of  n 
(the  number  of  standard  cells  balanced  at  the  end  of  the  heating  coil). 

From  these  observations  the  value  of  SO/St  at  the  centre  of  each  scale  unit  of  the 

u  2 


its 


DR.  E.   H.  GRIFFITHS   AND   MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 


TABLK  II— "  Total  Heat "  Method. 
Copper  at  0°  C.     Thermometers  AB,  CD. 


February  24 
„  24 
„  25 
„  25 
„  25 
,.  26 
28 

March  10 
10 
10 

11 

12 


II. 


5 

6 
1 

- 
9 
4 
7 
8 
9 
7 
4 
i 


III. 


1374-8 
9«5-5 

3743-5 
557-4 
446-8 

2125-9 
717-8 
557-6 
446-9 
718-3 

2126-0 

2123-8 


IV. 


109 
85 

231 
60 
52 


150-5 
70-5 
59-9 
52-2 
70-3 

150-9 


150-2 


V. 


0-0027 
0-0018 
0-0071 
0-0009 
0-0006 
0-0042 
0-0012 
0-0009 
0-0006 
0-0012 
0-0042 
0-0042 


VI. 


0-0355 
0-0510 
0-0141 
0-0843 
0-1036 
0-0239 
0-0662 
0-0841 
0-1039 
0-0658 
0-0241 
0-0234 


VII. 


1-3356 
1-3519 
3095 
3863 
4059 
3224 


1-3678 


3861 
•4062 
•3674 
•3227 


1-3219 


VIII. 


0-09070 
0-09062 
0-09068 
0-09070 
0-09073 
0-09066 
0-09064 
0-09073 
0-09073 
0-09072 
0-09070 
0-09060 


IX. 


+  0-02 

-0-06 

0 

+  0-02 
+  0-05 
-0-02 
-0-04 
+  0-05 
+  0-05 
+  0-04 
+  0-02 
-0-08 


Mean .     .     . 


0-09068  +0-00016* 


rhere 


M  =  3395-80, 
ms  =        6-489, 


R  =  20-599, 

E=    1-01843(17-0.), 


Column  I.  =  date  of  experiment, 

„  II.  =  n  (number  of  standard  cells), 

„  HI.  =  /  (seconds), 

„  IV.  =  time  over  first  interval, 

.,  V.  =  radiation  correction  on  range, 

„  VI.  =  "  rise  above  "  in  degrees  Pt, 

,,  VII.  =  true  range, 

„  VIII.  =  specific  heat, 

„  IX.  =  percentage  difference  from  mean. 


*  The  value  0-09068  for  S  is  obtained  on  the  assumption  that  00  coincides  with  0  bridge- wire  reading; 
if,  however,  the  balancing  point  was  at  +  0  •  1  bridge  wire  reading,  and  the  range  from  -  9  to  +8  bridge 
wire,  then,  on  account  of  radiation  gain,  the  above  value  of  S  requires  a  correction  of  +  0  •  00005. 

At  the  time  these  experiments  were  made  we  did  not  realise  the  importance  of  this  correction  and, 
conaequently,  did  not  determine  the  balancing  point  on  the  bridge  with  sufficient  care  (see  p.  151). 

In  our  rough  notes  made  at  the  time  we  have  values  ranging  from  +0- 1  to  +0'4  bridge  wire. 

Applying  the  "intersection  method"  (see  Section  X.  (2))  to  the  above  experiments,  omitting  the  first 
two  or  three  transits  in  each  case,  we  find  from  the  calculated  value  of  0N  that  the  balancing  point  should 
be  at  +0-33  bridge  wire.  If  we  assume  this  value,  the  correction  on  S  is  +0-00016. 


Hence 


8  =  0-09084. 


CAPACITY  FOR  HEAT  OF  METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  149 

bridge-wire  division  could  be  calculated,  and  also  tan  <f>,  the  slope  of  the  resulting 
straight  line  obtained  by  plotting  dd/dt  against  6. 

If  there  were  no  losses  or  gains  by  radiation,  the  resulting  lines  would  be 
horizontal 

As  the  rate  of  rise  due  to  radiation  depends  solely  on  the  difference  of  temperature 
between  the  metal  and  the  surroundings,  the  lines  representing  the  observed  values 
of  SO/St  for  the  various  rates  of  electrical  supply  have  all  the  same  inclination  to  the 
horizontal,  within  the  limits  of  experimental  error. 

The  equation  of  the  line  representing  an  experiment,  where  n  standard  cells  are 
Iwlanced  at  the  ends  of  the  heating  coil,  is  seen  to  be 

*  +<r(8  +  8  -8)=         n>E> 

where 

$8/&t  is  the  observed  rate  of  rise, 
8  is  the  temperature  indicated  by  the  thermometer, 
80  is  the  temperature  of  surrounding  envelope, 

8,  is  the  lag  of  the  observed  temperature  for  the  particular  rate  behind  the 
temperature  of  the  "  radiating  "  surface. 

(The  determination  of  this  lag  is  discussed  below.) 

Hence,  by  dividing  throughout  by  n3,  we  have 

:3-?  +  5<«H-4)- 


JR(MS+m.)' 

The  right-hand  side  would  represent  the  rate  of  rise  due  to  the  electrical  supply 
with  a  potential  difference  of  one  standard  cell 

i    $6 

Hence,  if  we  can  determine  the  particular  value  of  — .  —  at  the  temperature  which 

n     ot 

we  denote  by  0N,  when  the  second  term  of  the  equation  vanishes,  we  have  the  rate 
of  rise  due  to  the  electrical  supply  only. 

1    88 

Plotting  — .  —  against  the  observed  temperature  due  to  the  various  values  of  n, 
n    6t 

we  obtain  a  series  of  straight  lines  whose  tangents  vary  inversely  as  n*. 

Now,  for  each  experiment  thus  plotted,  there  is  a  certain  point  on  the  line  where 

1      Xfi  V* 

-  .  --  represents  TTt  ...         — r  alone,  and  this  would  correspond  to  the  temperature 
n"   St  JR(MS+mx) 

0N  at  which  there  are  no  losses  or  gains  by  radiation,  i.e.,  when  the  mean  temperature 
of  the  surface  subject  to  radiation  is  coincident  with  the  temperature  of  the 
surroundings.  As  the  co-ordinates  of  this  point  are  the  same  for  all  rates,  the  lines 
would  intersect  at  one  point  if  either  the  observed  6  was  the  actual  temperature 
of  the  "  radiating  "  surface,  or  the  lag  was  constant  for  all. 


,  -„,  DR.   E.   H.  GRIFFITHS  AND   MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 

The  dotted  lines  in  fig.  7  represent  a  typical  case— that  of  copper  at  0°  C.  with 

thermometer  AA. 

It  will  l»  noticed  that  the  lines  representing  the  higher  rates  of  supply  are 
markedly  to  the  left  of  those  obtained  from  the  lesser  values  of  n,  indicating  that  the 
"  lag  "  increases  with  the  rate  of  supply,  as  might  be  expected. 


\ 


I 
-•1° 


'x  \       XK,  **•<        389- 
\     \ 


\       \ 
\      \ 


\  \ 

\  \ 

v  \ 

s  \ 


Fig.  7. 

A.  study  of  the  "  total  heat "  experiments  led  us  to  the  conclusion  that  the  "  rise 
above  "  was  intimately  connected  with  this  "  lag."  Although  the  entire  "  rise  above  " 
on  switching  off  could  not  be  solely  due  to  thermometer  lag,  yet,  as  a  first 
approximation,  it  represents  the  superior  limit. 

Hence,  by  shifting  each  line  parallel  to  itself  to  the  right  by  the  value  of  6t 
determined  at  the  close  of  the  experiment,  we  obtained  the  figure  shown  in  full  lines, 

1  ^/l  _^ 

the  result,  of  course,  being  the  same  as  if  — .  —  had  been  plotted  against  6  +  Ot. 

72-        of 

Owing  to  observational  errors,  the  lines  do  not  intersect  in  a  single  point,  but 
enclose  a  small  area.  In  cases  where  a  really  satisfactory  series  of  observations  has 
been  obtained,  however,  the  area  of  the  triangle  (when  three  experiments  are 
considered)  is  vanishingly  small  even  when  the  results  are  plotted  on  such  a  scale 


CAPACITY   FOR  HEAT  OF  METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  151 

i    SB 

that  1  cm.  vertically  represents  a  change  of  1  in  2000  in  —  .  —  and  there  are  many 

instances  where  the  ordinatea  of  the  vertices  do  not  differ  from  the  mean  by  more 
than  1  part  in  5000. 

This,  in  our  opinion,  is  the  strongest  evidence  in  support  of  the  assumption  that  the 
"  rise  al>ove  "  is  practically  equal  to  the  "  lag  "  to  the  degree  of  accuracy  to  which  the 
hori/.untal  scale  is  required.  We  may  state  here  that  when  plotting  the  results,  we 
used  a  scale  such  that  5  cm.  abscisste  represented  0°'l  Pt,  the  vertical  scale,  of  course, 

Ix'iiig  considerably  greater,  enabling    the  fifth  figure  in   the  value  of  -j  .  -     to  be 

n      ot 

determined.  In  our  earlier  reductions,  we  ascertained  the  mean  ordinate  by  reading 
the  ordinates  of  all  the  points  of  intersection  ;  for  example,  for  4  values  of  n,  we 
obtained  6  intersections.  In  cases,  however,  where  the  angle  ^  resulting  from  two 
experiments  differed  but  by  a  small  amount,  as  in  the  case  of  n  =  7  and  n  =  8,  a 
slight  error  in  the  inclination  of  either  line  might  cause  a  large  displacement  in  the 
point  of  intersection.  We  therefore  adopted  a  method  of  reduction*  which  enabled 
us  to  calculate  the  co-ordinates  of  the  point  such  that,  measured  along  the  ordinate 
passing  through  this  point,  the  sum  of  the  moments  of  inertia  of  the  points  of 
intersection  of  the  several  lines  with  this  ordinate  is  a  minimum  about  this  point. 
Or,  stated  otherwise  : — The  point  so  calculated  gives,  by  the  method  of  least  squares, 
the  most  probable  value  of  the  ordinate  of  the  point  of  intersection  of  all  the  lines 
(for  a  typical  example  see  p.  157). 

A  large  number  of  determinations  of  the  specific  heats  of  Cu  at  0°  C.  were  made 
by  both  the  "  total  heat "  and  the  "  intersection  "  methods  (see  Section  XI.). 

The  correspondence  between  the  final  results  obtained  was  remarkably  close 
(the  differences  in  no  case  exceeding  1  in  1000),  and  indicated  the  validity  of  both 
methods.  Having  satisfied  ourselves  on  this  point,  we  adopted  the  latter  method  for 
all  our  remaining  experiments,  as  it  avoided  the  following  cause  of  difficulty  and 
delay  which  was  xmavoidable  in  the  former. 

The  removal  of  our  metal  block  and  its  replacement  by  another  was  a  lengthy 
business,  requiring  considerable  care,  as  all  the  soldered  joints  in  the  various  electrical 
circuits  had  to  be  separated  and  remade,  the  brass  case  removed  and  opened,  Ac. 

It  was  not  possible  to  complete  the  operation  in  less  than  several  hours,  and  the 
temperature  of  the  tank  necessarily  suffered  some  alteration  in  the  process.  On  re- 
establishing the  system,  small  consequential  changes  in  the  balancing  point  on  the 
bridge  might  have  occurred,  or,  at  all  events,  the  absence  of  any  such  changes  had  to 
be  ascertained.  Thus,  it  was  necessary  to  allow  time  for  the  newly  inserted  block  to 
settle  to  the  tank  temperature,  and,  as  its  approach  to  that  temperature  was  slow  and 
asymptotic,  at  least  a  day  or  two  had  to  elapse  before  the  "  zero  "  point  could  be 
ascertained  with  certainty.  The  im]x>rtance  of  this  matter  is  indicated  by  the  fact 

*  For  this  suggestion  we  are  indebted  to  Mr.  G.  M.  CLARKE,  M.A. 


132  DR.    K    H    CKIFFITHS  AND   MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 

that  an  error  of  O'l  bridge-wire  division  (=  0°'007  Pt)  in  the  estimation  of  the  zero 
I>oiiit  would  affect  conclusions  derived  from  an  experiment  of  average  length  by  the 
total  heat  method  by  (in  the  case  of  Cu,  for  example)  5  parts  in  9000.  In  our 
earlier  "  total  heat "  experiments  we  had  not  realized  the  importance  of  this  zero 
reading,  and  this  no  doubt  is  the  cause  of  certain  discrepancies. 

The  position  of  the  zero  point  was,  however,  of  little  importance  when  the 
intersection  method  was  adopted,  for  so  long  as  the  temperature  of  the  reference 
block  remained  unchanged,  the  effect  of  any  alteration  in  the  zero  point  was  self- 
eliminated. 

The  method  of  reduction  is  shown  by  one  example,  namely,  that  of  copper  at  0°  C., 
with  thermometers  AA,  BB. 

The  only  reason  which  has  guided  us  in  the  selection  of  this  out  of  the  48  similar 
groups,  is  that  it  happens  to  be  first  of  the  groups  given  in  Table  XI.  The  large 
amount  of  arithmetic  involved  in  the  reduction  of  our  observations  is  well  illustrated 
by  this  example. 

Explanation  of  Tables. 

n  =  number  of  standard  cells  balanced  on  heating  coil. 

Column  I.,  bridge  readings. — The  successive  points  on  bridge  wire  across  which 
transits  were  taken. 

Column  II.  (t ). — Times  of  transit  from  chronograph  tape. 

Column  III.  (St). — Interval  between  successive  transits.  (If  transits  observed  every 
l£  bridge  wire,  as  in  Experiment  IV.,  then  St  for  1  bridge  wire  calculated.) 

Column  IV.  (Se). — Value  in  Pt  degree  of  bridge- wire  division  corresponding  to  St. 

Column  V.  (^  x  107). 
\ot  I 

Column  VI.  (0). — Temperature  at  mid-point  of  SO,  measured  from  centre  of  bridge 
wire. 

Column  VII.— The  letters  denote  the  values  of  Sd/St  taken  in  pairs,  for  the  purpose 
of  obtaining  the  slope  of  the  line. 

Column  VIII. —Change  in  S8/St  for  equal  intervals  of  temperature. 


CAPACITY   FOR   IIKAT  OF   MKTALS   AT   DII-TKKKNT  TKMI'KKATrKKS. 


153 


TABLE  HI. — Experiment  I.,  June  3,  1912.     Number  Standard  Cells,  5. 


I.           II. 

III. 

IV. 

V. 

VL 

VII. 

VIII. 

Bridge 
readings. 

/. 

&l. 

86x10*. 

gxlO, 

e. 

8*A      MA. 
"S~  ~  fc~' 

«A           «V 

215-25 

8-5 

286-90 

71 

7-2820 

10163 

-0-657 

A 

7-6 

369-45 

7  -2  •;..-, 

7-2845 

10041 

-0-584 

B 

A  -A' 

357 

6-5 

48S'M 

M-75 

7  •  2882 

10018 

-0-511 

C 

5-5 

504-95 

72-75 

7-2901 

10021 

-0-438 

D 

B-IT 

381 

4-5 

578-75 

73-80 

7-2874 

M7B 

-0-365 

E 

3-5 

652-75 

74-00 

7-2742 

9830 

-0-292 

F 

c-cr 

357 

2-5 

726-55 

73-80 

7-2736 

9994 

-0-219 

Q 

1-5 

801-20 

74-65 

7-2902 

9766 

-0-146 

H 

D-IX 

353 

0-5 

875-60 

74-40 

7-2968 

MQ6 

-0-073 

A' 

+  0-5 

951-15 

75-55 

7-2978 

9660 

0 

B- 

E-ff 

311 

1-5 

1026-70 

75-55 

7-2990 

9661 

+  0-073 

G 

2-5 

1102-20 

75-50 

7-3018 

1I66M 

+  0-146 

V 

F-P 

304 

3-5 

1178-80 

76-60 

7-3-.'30           !i.  •><;:! 

+  0-L'l'.i 

K 

4-5           1255-90         77-10 

7-34-J-           95L>6 

+  0-292 

r 

<;-({' 

413 

5-6    •      1332-50         76  -CO         7-3390           '.<:,*  \ 

+  0-365 

G' 

6-5 

1409-90         77-40 

7-3106           9446 

+  0-438 

H        H-H' 

320 

f 

350 

Mean  .    .    . 

9789  at  -0°-110  C. 

Mean  .     .  < 

for  difference 

I 

of  0'-584C. 

TABLE  IV. — Experiment  II.,  June  1,  1912.     Number  Standard  Cells,  4. 


I 


L 

II. 

III. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

VII. 

VIII. 

Bridge 
readings. 

/. 

s/. 

80  x  10s. 

£*'<"• 

</. 

S0A      S0A. 

*A            *A     ' 

-9-5 

0-75 

-8-5 

111-30 

110-55 

7-2820          6587 

-0-657          A 

-7-5 

222-00 

110-70 

7  •  2845          6580 

-0-584          B 

A  -A' 

372 

-6-5 

334-00 

112-00 

7-2882          6507 

-0-511          C 

-6-5 

447-10 

113-10 

7-2901 

6446 

-0-438          D 

B-B' 

327 

4-5 

561-50 

114-40 

7-2874 

6370 

-0-365          E 

3-5 

675-20 

113-70 

7-2742 

6398 

-0-292          F 

C-C' 

337 

2-5             789-75 

114-55 

7-2736 

6350 

-0-219          G 

1-5             906-10 

116-35 

7-2902          6266 

-0-146          H 

D-D' 

361 

0-5            1023-50 

117-40 

7-2958          6214 

-0-073 

A' 

+  0-5 

1140-20 

116-70 

7-2978          6253 

0 

B' 

E-E' 

280 

1-6 

1258-50 

118-30 

7-2990          6170 

+  0-073          C' 

2-5 

1378-60 

120-00 

7-3018          6085 

+  0-146          D' 

F-F 

332 

3-5 

1498-75 

120-25 

7-3230 

6090 

+  0-219          E' 

4-5 

1619-80 

121-05 

7-3422          6065 

+  0-292          F 

G-G' 

329 

5-5 

1741-70 

121-90 

7-3390          6021 

+  0-365          G' 

6-5 

1864-00 

122-30 

7-3106          5978 

+  0-438          H' 

H-H' 

288 

r 

328 

Mean  .     .     .        6290  at  -0°-110C. 

Mean  .     .< 

for  difference 

I 

of  0'-584C. 

i 

VOL.  ivxiii. — A. 


154  |,!;.    K.    H.   GRIFFITHS   AND   MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  TIIK 

r 

TABLE  V.— Experiment  III.,  June  2,  1912.     Number  Standard  Cells,  6. 


L                II. 

III. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

VII. 

VIIL 

Bridge 

tt 

80x10* 

%*™- 

e. 

se.  _  SOA, 

readings. 

5 

«A      "SI. 

-9-5 

151-65 

-8-5 

202-00 

50-35 

7-2820 

14463 

-0-657 

A 

-7-6 

252-90 

50-90 

7-2845 

14311 

-0-584 

B 

A  -A' 

513 

-6-5 

303-90 

51-00 

7-2882 

14291 

-0-511 

C 

-5-5 

354-80 

50-90 

7-2901 

14322 

-0-438 

D 

B-B' 

358 

-4-5 

406-40 

51-60 

7-2874 

14123 

-0-365 

E 

-3-5 

457-90 

51-50 

7-2742 

14125 

-0-292 

F 

C-C' 

348 

-2-5 

509-20 

61-30 

7-2736 

14178 

-0-219 

G 

-1-5 

561-00 

51-80 

7-2902 

14074 

-0-146 

H 

D-D' 

427 

-0-5 

613-30 

52-30 

7-2958 

13950 

-0-073 

A' 

665-60 

52-30 

7-2978 

13954 

0 

B' 

E-E' 

148 

1-5 

717-95 

52-35 

7-2990 

13943 

+  0-073 

C' 

2-5 

770-50 

52-55 

7-3018 

13895 

+  0-146 

D' 

F-F 

337 

3-5 

822-90 

52-40 

7-3230 

13975 

+  0-219 

E' 

4-5 

876-15 

53-25 

7-3422 

13788 

+  0-292 

F 

G-G' 

344 

929-20 

53-05 

7-3390 

13834 

+  0-365 

G' 

m 

6-5 

982-30 

53-10 

7-3106 

13768 

+  0  •  438 

H' 

H-H' 

306 

r 

348 

Mean  .     .    . 

14062  at  -0°-110C. 

Mean  .     .< 

for  difference 

I 

of  0°-584C. 

TABLE  VI— Experiment  IV.,  June  2,  1912.     Number  Standard  Cells,  7. 


I. 

II. 

III. 

rv.          v. 

VI. 

VII. 

VIII. 

Bridge 

•i 

\ 

f\ 

0SA      S0A, 

readings. 

. 

°2'      ^X 

V. 

W^'-st' 

-9-6 

75-55 

8-5 

112-75 

37-20 

7-2820 

19575 

-0-657 

A 

7-5 

150-50 

37-75 

7-2845 

19297 

-0-584 

B       1  A-  A' 

526 

6-5 

188-00 

37-50 

7-2882 

19435 

-0-511 

C 

5-5 

225-70 

37-70 

7-2901 

19337 

-0-438 

D 

B-B' 

292 

4-5 

263-70 

38-00 

7-2874 

19177 

-0-365 

E 

3-5 

301-55 

37-85 

7-2742 

19219 

-0-292 

F 

C-C' 

278 

2-5 

339-55 

38-00 

7-2736 

19141 

-0-219 

G 

1-5 

377-70 

38-15 

7-2902 

19109 

-0-146 

H 

D-D' 

469 

0-5 

416-00 

38-30 

7-2958 

19049 

-0-073 

A' 

+  0-5 

454-40 

38-40 

7-2978 

19005 

0 

B' 

E-E' 

255 

1-5             492-50 

38-10 

7-2990 

19157 

+  0-073 

C' 

2-5 
3-5 

531-20 
569-90 

38-70 
38-70 

7-3018         18868 
7-3230         18923 

+  0-146 
+  0-219 

D' 

E' 

F-F 

295 

4-5 
5-5 

608-70         38-80 
647-60         39-90 

7-3422 
7-3390 

18923 
18866 

+  0-29.'          F 
+  0-365          G' 

G-G' 

275 

6-5             686-65         39-05 

7-3106 

18721 

+  0-438          H'       H-H' 

388 

19113  at  -0°-110  C. 

347 

Mean  .    . 

for  difference 

of  0°-584C. 

CAPACITY  FOR  HEAT  OF   METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  155 


TABLK  VII. — Experiment  V.,  .Inn.-  •_',  l<>12.     Number  Standard  Cells,  8. 


I 

I. 

II. 

III. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

VII. 

VIII. 

Bridge 
readings. 

/. 

$St  x  10*. 

80  x  10s. 

£«'<"• 

e. 

S0A     S0A. 

S/A          «A.  ' 

-9-0 

86-20 

7-5 

l-J'.i  -50 

43-30 

7-2836 

25228 

-0-602 

A 

6-0 

I7l>-80 

43-30         7-2890         L-.VJ50 

-0-493 

B 

A  -A' 

269 

4-5 

216-60          43-80         7-2892         24963 

-0-383 

C 

3-0 

260-10          4:1  -50 

7-2718         25075 

-0-274 

D 

I:     l; 

367 

1-5 

303-85 

43-75 

7-2875         24985 

-0-164 

E 

0 

347-70 

43-85 

7-2964         24959 

-0-055 

A' 

C-C' 

372 

+  1-5 

391-70 

44-00 

7-2985         24882 

+  0-055 

B' 

• 

3-0 

436  •  iT> 

44-55 

7-3034         24591 

+  0-164 

cr 

D-D' 

166 

!•:. 

480-45 

11-20 

7-3400         24909 

+  0-274 

D' 

6-0 

569-50 

11-65 

7-3320         24631 

+  0-383          E' 

E-E' 

354 

f 

306 

Mean  .    .    . 

24947  at  +  <T-110C. 

Mean  .     .< 

for  difference 
of  Oe-547C. 

In  Experiment      L,  5  cells,  jp~  ^/0A-0A'  ==  350/0*584  =  59'9x  10~7  for  00>1  C. 

II.,  4  „  „  „  „  =  382/0-584  =  56'2  „  „ 

HI.,  6  „  „  „  „  =  348/0-584  =  59'G  „  „ 

IV.,  7  „  „  „  „  =  347/0-584  =  59'4  „  „ 

V.,  8  „  „  „  „  =  306/0-547  =  55'9  „  „ 

Hence  mean  difference  for  change  of  0°'l  Pt  =  58  X  10~7. 

Reducing  the  mean  S6/St  in  each  experiment  from  —  0°"110  C.  to  0°  C.  by  this  mean 
tangent  and  then  calculating  the  values  at  — 0°'l  C.  and  +0°'l  C.,  we  obtain  the 
following  results : — 


Experi- 

80 

80 

1  80 

ment 

„.   j-  at  0°  C. 

—  at*-  0  '  1  C. 

-r—  at  +0  "1C. 

—(  j-  ]     x  10". 

—1  5—  I     x  10". 

No. 

of 

« 

-,c. 

I. 

1 

5      9725 

'.'7-:; 

9667 

39132 

38668 

II. 

4      6226 

6284 

6168 

39275 

38550 

III. 

6     13998 

14056 

13940 

39044 

38722 

IV. 

7     19049 

19107 

18991 

88994 

38757 

V. 

8     24883 

24941 

24825 

38970 

38789 

x  2 


156 


Ml;.    K.    II.    CKIFFITHS    AND    Ml;.    KXKK   GRIFFITHS   ON    THE 


T\\"  •  •<  >rrections  are  necessary  to  make  the  values  off-    -)  comparable — 

\n3  St  / 

(1)  The  change  in  resistance  by  change  of"  current ; 

(2)  The  departure  of  the  mean  E.M.F.  of  the  group  of  standard  cells  used  from 

the  standards. 

1  $0 
The  correction  to  —  —  for  these  is  designated  by  Cd  cell  and  £R,  the  experimental 

/.   .  / 

results  are  now  arranged  in  order  of  n. 


Experiment 
No. 

n. 

Cd  cell. 

SR. 

i(I)   *10- 

n^ot  /»t  -Wi  C. 

«a\^/at  +o°-ic. 

II. 

i 

+  10 

+  3 

39288 

38563 

I. 

5 

+  10 

+  5 

39147 

38683 

III. 

6 

+  9 

+  7 

39060 

38773 

IV. 

7 

+  6 

+  10 

39010 

38773 

V. 

8 

+  5 

+  13 

38988 

38807 

| 

Before  proceeding  with  the  next  step — the  determination  of  the  mean  point  of 
intersection  either  graphically  or  by  calculation— we  require  the  value  of  the  "  rise 
above  "  in  each  experiment. 

As  an  example  of  the  method,  we  quote  that  of  Experiment  IV.,  June  2,  1912. 
Number  standard  cells,  7. 

Contact  maker  of  bridge  set  up  0°'088  Pt  beyond  switching-off  point. 

TABLE  VIII. 


Time  (from  I  ,,.,,. 
instant  of   :  Mllllmetr<> 

switching      ,  Jca'? 
Ojj.v    '       deflection. 

0  x  10s. 

0  after 
radiation 
correction 
xlO3. 

Time  (from 
instant  of 
switching 
off). 

Millimetre 
scale 
deflection. 

0  x  10s. 

0  after 
radiation 
correction 
xlO». 

149                 27 
160                 30 
172                 32 
184                 33 
195                 29 
209                 27 
223                 23 
234                 17 
245                 11 
257                   9 
267                   4 
275                   1 
283              -    5 
291              -   8 
302              -  14 
313              -19 

2-0 
2-2 
2-3 
2-4 
2-1 
2-0 
1-7 
1-2 
0-8 
0-6 
0-3 
0-1 
-0-4 
-0-6 
-1-0 
-1-4 

7-4 
8-0 
8-5 
9-0 
9-1 
9-5 
9-7 
9-6 
9-6 
9-8 
9-9 
10-0 
9-8 
9-9 
9-9 
9-9 

324 
335 
348 
362 
375 
390 
405 
422 
439 
453 
467 
483 
498 
512 
528 
546 

-    24 
-    28 
-    35 
-    43 
-    52 
-    58 
-    66 
•    74 
-    82 
-    91 
-   97 
-104 
-111 
-118 
-128 
-135 

-1-8 
-2-0 
-2-6 
-3-1 
-3-8 
-4-2 
-4-8 
-5-4 
-6-0 
-6-6 
-7-1 
-7-6 
-8-1 
-8-6 
-9-3 
-9-8 

9-9 
10-1 
9-9 
9-9 
9-7 
9-8 
9-8 
9-8 
9-8 
9-7 
9-7 
9-8 
9-8 
9-8 
9-7 
9-9 

—  —  —  —  —  ^ 

—  —  —  ^~—.  __ 

CAPACITY   FOR   HEAT  OF   MKTAI.S   AT    DIFFKKI.NT   TKMI'ERATfKKS. 


157 


Hence 

"Total  rise  above"  =  0'088  +  0'0099  =  0°'0979  C. 

'I'lie  figure  on  p.  145  represents  the  above  data.* 

TABLE  IX. — Calculation  of  the  Co-ordinates  of  the  "  Most  Probable  Common 

Point  of  Intersection." 


Experiment 
No. 

n. 

(.J^^xlOi. 

i($_xH,. 

Shift 
xlO. 

Equation  of  line  after 
shift  applied. 

II. 

4 

39288 

38563 

0-334 

y  -  39046  -  362^ 

I. 

5 

39147 

88683 

0-512 

y  =  39034  -  232-e 

III. 

6 

39060 

38773 

0-729               >i  -  39021  -  144/ 

IV. 

7 

39010 

38773 

0-979 

y  =  39008  -118* 

V. 

8 

38988 

38807 

1-254 

y  =  39011-   9Lr 

Equation  of  mean  line  u  =  39024  —  189jr.                                   (\\ 

Multiplying  each  term  by  the  coefficient  of  x  in  the  same  equation 

3620+ 131044s  =  141346, 
2320+    53824o-  =    90559, 
1440+   20736Z  =    56190, 
13924J?  =    46029, 
8281-r  =    35500, 

Mean 

0+240sc  =  39031 (2) 

Solving  equations  (l)  and  (2)  for  x  and  0  we  have  the  co-ordinates  of  the  required 

point 

x=  +0-137, 

0  =  38998. 
Expressing  x  and  y  in  absolute  measure  we  have 

•  fa:  x  O'l    =  degrees  Pt, 

0x10-"=-,^. 

>M*      ft 

Hence 


n 


0N  =  +0°-0137  Pt, 

I^N  =  38998  XlO-9. 
n1  tit 

*  This  figure  indicates  how  the  "  rise  above  corrected  "  can  be  obtained  more  simply  by  the  prolongation 
of  n  straight  line. 


158  I'll.    V-    II.    «;i;IFFITIIS    AND    MR.    K/F.R   GRIFFITHS   ON   THE 

\  ^iniill  uncertainty  in  tho  value  of  0S  has  but  little  effect  on  —j-^',  for  example, 

an  error  of  (VI  in  x  would  only  produce  an  error  of  1  in  2000  in  the  above  value  of  y. 

A  correction  of  —3  has  to  be  applied  to  y  for  the  clock  rate,  which  was  a  losing  one 
of  0'05  sec.  per  1000. 

The  distribution  of  the  results  of  the  individual  experiments  about  the  "  most 
probable  point  of  intersection  '  may  be  determined  by  solving  the  equation  of  each 
line  for  its  intersection  point  with  the  ordinate  through  x  =  +0'137. 


TABLK  X 


I. 

II. 

III. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

Experiment 
No. 

«. 

.'/ 
(mean). 

.'/ 
(calculated). 

Difference. 

(Difference)2. 

II. 

4 

f              38993 

-2 

4 

I. 
III. 
IV. 
V. 

5 
6 

7 
8 

, 

38995 

38999 
38998 
38989 
38996 

+  4 
+  3 
-6 
+  1 

16 
9 
36 

1 

Total      .     .     . 

66 

Probable  observational  error  =  ±  §  */-.    2  (difference)2        =  +g 

V    No.  experiments  —1 


Coefficient  of  variation  per  cent.  =  ±0'01. 


In  Tables  XL  to  XVIII.,  pp.  161   to  169,  we  give  the  value  of  y  (calculated)  for 
h  group  ,„  Column  VII. ;  the  error  per  cent.  (Column  VIII.)  being  the  coefficient 
of  variation  obtained  as  above. 

^ig.  7,  p.  150,  represents  the  above  group  of  experiments ;  the  most  probable  point 

tion  obtained  by  calculation  is  shown  by  a  large  cross. 

Attention  may  be  drawn  to  the  fact  that  no  "  smoothed  curves"  have  been  used  in 
the  above  reduction. 


CAPACITY  FOR  HEAT  OF  METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.          159 


r  •mjrcil 

[ms  +  MSJ  — 


1     CiHv  fj 


n»  dt       JR/ 

• 

M  =  mass  copper  block -f  case  =  3392'37 
ms  =  thermal  capacity  of  oil,  quartz,  glass  and  solder  =  4'898, 
K  =  resistance  of  coil  =  20'599, 
E  =  E.M.F.  standard  cell  at  15°  (!.  ==  1 '01 848, 
f=d  (U)(d  (Ft)  at  0°  C.  =  0'98480. 

Hence 

S  =  0-09094. 

NOTE.      /  =  3  (#)/?  (Pt).     The  values  of  30/3 Pt  at  temperature  fl  are  obtained  from 

('IIAITIMS  Mini  HAKKKU'S  tables,  '  Phil.  Trans.,' vol.  l!)4,  p.  114.     Assuming  S  =  T54. 


SECTION  XI. 
Experimental  Re.mlts.     Preliminary  Experiments. 

A  considerable  number  of  preliminary  experiments  were  performed  with  a  view  of 
testing  the  apparatus  employed  and  deciding  on  the  most  suitable  conditions.  Some 
were  carried  out  with  a  constantan  heating  coil  of  10  ohms  resistance,  which  was 
replaced  by  a  manganin  coil  of  wider  section  and  greater  resistance. 

A  large  number  of  experiments  were  performed  with  silvered  vacuum  vessels 
interposed  between  the  metal  blocks  and  the  brass  cases.  The  results  obtained  with 
different  rates  of  energy  supply  were  discordant.  The  faster  the  rate  of  rise,  the 
lower  the  value  found  for  the  resulting  specific  heat.  These  differences  were  roughly 
proportional  to  the  duration  of  the  heating ;  the  range  being  practically  the  same 
in  ail. 

The  source  of  this  error  we  traced  to  the  effect  of  radiation,  &c.,  on  the  inner  walls 
of  the  vacuum  vessel.  This  surface  received  heat  by  radiation  from  the  block  and  as 
it  parted  with  the  heat  but  slowly,  its  temperature  rose  with  that  of  the  block  to  an 
extent  dependent  on  the  rate  of  increase  of  temperature  of  the  metal. 

After  the  removal  of  the  vacuum  vessels,  the  loss  or  gain  by  radiation  was 
dependent  on  6— 6a  only,  as  the  surrounding  walls  were  now  those  washed  by  the  tank 
water  and  remained  at  a  constant  temperature.  Our  anxiety  to  minimize  loss  or  gain 
of  heat  from  external  sources  by  the  interposition  of  these  flasks  had  led  us,  when 
designing  the  apparatus,  to  regard  the  insertion  of  the  non-conducting  walls  as 
:  this  precaution,  however,  was  a  cause  of  much  loss  of  time  and  labour. 


160  DR    K.    H.   UKIFFITHS  AND  MR.  EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 


Explanation  of  the  Tables. 

Column  I. — The  temperature  at  which  experiments  were  performed. 

During  our  experiments  at  0°  C.  we  changed  both  thermometers  and  lids  ;  we  have, 
therefore,  in  this  column  indicated  the  thermometers  and  lid  used. 

Letters  AA  and  AA',  indicate  the  thermometers  referred  to  in  Section  III. 

Letters  L,,  the  lighter,  and  L,,  the  heavier  lid  (see  Section  VI.). 

Where  no  indication  is  given,  the  thermometer  used  was  AA',  and  lid,  La. 

Column  II. — The  dates  on  which  the  series  were  performed  is  given  to  indicate  the 
results  obtained  on  repetition  after  lapse  of  time. 

Column  III. — The  number  of  transits  denotes  the  number  of  observations  of  $8/St 
obtained  during  the  experiment. 

Column  IV. — No.  Cd  Cells. — The  number  of  standard  Weston  cells  in  series,  whose 
E.M.F.  was  balanced  at  the  ends  of  the  heating  coil. 

Column  V.  "  Rise  Above." — This  was  determined  at  the  close  of  each  experiment. 

The  line  representing  an  experiment  was  shifted  horizontally  by  this  amount. 

1     <W 
Column  VI.  Tangents  (Abscissae  0°'l  Pt). — The  slope  of  the  line  —  •  -j-  with  tempe- 

IV  0*' 

rature  H  as  abscissa. 

Absolute  value  =  number  in  Column  x  10~9. 

Column  VII. — 'The  points  of  intersection  of  the  lines  of  various  rates  with  the 
ordinate  through  0N  (see  p.  158). 

Absolute  value  =  number  in  Column  x  10~9. 

Column  VIII. — The  probable  observational  error  per  cent,  of  the  group. 

Column  IX. — The  data  required  for  the  reduction.  It  will  be  noticed  that  the 
mass  of  the  metal  block  has  in  some  cases  changed  during  the  course  of  the  experi- 
ment, owing  to  certain  alterations  such  as  enlarging  holes,  &c.,  which  were  found 
necessary. 

ms  denotes  the  capacity  for  heat  of  copper  case  and  the  group  of  subsidiary 
substances,  or  of  the  latter  only  when  the  block  itself  is  copper. 


CAPACITY   FOR   HEAT  OF   METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPER ATUKKS. 


161 


TABLB  XI. — Copper. 


L 

n. 

III. 

IV. 

V. 

VL 

VII. 

VIII 

IX. 

Tem- 
perature 
tank. 

Date. 

No. 
transits. 

No.Cd 
cells, 
n. 

Rise 
above 
•Pt 

Tangents 
(abtehM 

0*-1  C.). 

i  dev 
n?~ST 

Error 
per 
cent 

•o. 

0 
AA 
L, 

1/6/12 
3/6/12 

2/6/12 
2/6/12 
2/6/12 

16 
16 
16 
16 
10 

4 

5 
6 

7 
8 

0-033 
0-051 
0-073 
0-098 
0-125 

362 
232 
144 
118 
91 

38993 
38999 
38998 
38989 
38996 

0-01 

R  -  20-599 
E-  1  -01848  (15'  C.) 
M  =  3392-37 
nu  -  4-898 

—  n-nonaj 

38995 

0 
A  A' 
L* 

25/7/U 

23/7/12 
24/7/12 
25/7/12 
23/7/12 
24/7/12 

16 
16 
16 
16 
10 
10 

5 
6 
6 
7 
8 
8 

0-039 
0-057 
0-057 
0-075 
0-097 
0-098 

237 
165 
16!) 
121 
93 
93 

38755 
38754 
38743 
38737 
387  1  1  mean  of  two 

38741 

0-03 

R-  20-609 
E-  1  -01838  (18°  C.) 
M  =  3409-18 

ms  =  5-577 

8  =  0-09079 

0 

AA' 

L* 

3/12/12 
3/12/12 
3/12/12 
3/12/12 

If, 
16 
16 
12 

4 

5 
6 

7 

0-037 
0-058 
0-081 
0-107 

449 
244 
169 
124 

38631 

38682 
38654 
38642 

0-05 

R-  20-620 
E=  1-01842  (17*  C.) 
M  =  3409-05 
ms  =  5-533 

8  =  0-09098 

38652 

0 

AA' 
L! 

5/12/12 

16 
16 
12 
10 
6 

5 
6 
7 
4 
4 

0-059 
0-085 
0-114 
0-040 
0-040 

235 
164 
120 
367 
367 

39052 
38964 
38931 
38969  mean  of  two 

0-08 

R  =  20-620 
E  =  1-01842  (17°  C.) 
M  =  3409-05 
ms  =  4-789 

80-09088 

38979 

28-42 

2/8/12 

16 
16 
10 

6 
7 
8 

0-053 
0-071 
0-091 

189 
138 
105 

37916 
37877 
37846 

0-06 

R=  20-627 
E=  1-01847  (15°  C.) 
M  =  3409-18 
>„,      5-819 

8  =  0-09230 

37880 

63-5 

1/9/12 

Set  of  three  experiments  of  little 
value  owing  to  leakage  of  tank-heating 
circuit  affecting  galvanometer. 

36763 

8  =  0-09365 

67-32 

13/9/12 
13/9/12 
16/9/12 
16/9/12 
13/9/12 
13/9/12 

20 
20 
20 
10 
13 
13 

4 

6 
7 
8 
7 
8 

0-027 
0-064 
0-086 
0-110 
0-084 
0-114 

427 
191 
139 
108 
139 
108 

36632 
36655 
36630  mean  7 
36629  mean  8 

36636 

0-02 

R-  20-635 
E-  1-0185(14"-5C.) 
M-  3409  -10 
ms  =  6-313 

8  =  0-09387 

97-4 

11/10/12 

16 
16 
12 

8 

5 
6 
7 
8 

0-042 
0-057 
0-077 
0-103 

330 
229 
151 
100 

35802 
35774 
35825 
35783 

35796 

0-04 

R=  20-621 
E=  1  -01840  (17'-5C.) 
M  =  3409-05 
nu  =  6-598 

8  =  0-09520 

VOL.  ccxin. — A. 


I'K.    K    H.   GRIFFITHS    A XI)   MR.    KZER   GRIFFITHS   ON    THE 
TABLE  XII. — Aluminium. 


I. 

II.           III. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

VII. 

vm.              ix. 

Tem- 
perature 
tank. 

Date. 

No. 
transits. 

No.  (k 
cells, 
ft. 

1       Rise 
above 
"Pt. 

Tangents 
(abscissae 
0°-1  C.). 

i  dev 

n*  ilt 

Error 
per 
cent. 

•c. 

30/6/12         19 

6 

0-111 

244 

54722                    R  =  20-599 

0                              19             7 

0-148           178 

54747                   E  =  1-01845  ne'e.} 

AA 

12 

8 

0-191 

137 

54720 

0-02     M  =  954-342 

ms  =  23-478 

L, 

54730 

8  =  0-20937 

14/7/12 

19 

6 

0-076 

243 

54022 

19 

7 

0-102 

177 

54005                    R  =  20-610 

0 

19/7/12 

12 
12 

8 
8 

0-131 
0-130 

137 
137 

54041       0-07      E  =  1-01838  (18°  C.) 
54139                    M  =  954-342 

AA' 

19 

7 

0-102 

177 

54144 

ms  =  25-764 

19 

6 

0-077 

243 

54080 

L* 

20/7/12 

13 

7 

0-102 

177 

54144 

13 

7 

0-102 

177 

54143 

8  =  0-20957 

19 

5 

0-054 

349 

54108 

Jl/7/12 

13 

8 

0-130 

137 

54095 

21 

6 

0-077 

243 

54114 

54094 

28-36 

6/8/12 

19 
12 
12 

6 

7 
7 

0-075 

o-ioo 

0-100 

239 
188 
188 

52345 
52344 
52350 

R  =  20-627 
E  =  1-01845  (16°  C.) 
0-02     M  =  954-342 

19 

5 

0-053 

344 

52353 

ms  =  26  •  207 

52348 

8  =  0-21471 

51 

25/1/13 
25/1/13 

26/1/13 

18 
12 
9 
18 
18 
12 

6 
7 
8 
5 
6 
7 

0-073 
0-100 
0-130 
0-056 
0-073 
0-100 

254 
187 
143 
366 
254 
187 

51058 
51076 
51006 
51140 
51039 
51130 

R  =  20-643 
E  =  1-01842  (16°-7  C.) 
0-04     M  =  954-00 
ms  =  26-772 

18 

5 

0-056 

366 

50989 

8  =  0  21842 

51064 

3/10/12 

18 

4 

0-034 

670 

48936 

97-48 

18 
12 
9 
13 
10 

5 

6 
7 
6 
7 

0-052 
0-073 
0-101 
0-073 
0-101 

431 
299 
220 
299 
220 

48939 
48973 
48828 
48959 
49018 

R=  20-621 
E=  1  -01838  (18°  C.) 
0-08     M  =  954-00 
ms=  27-632 



8  =  0-22482 

- 

— 

~ 

48942 

CAPACITY  KOI;  UKAT  OF  MKTAI.S  AT  DIFFKKKNT  TK.MI-KKATI  u> 


I.;:; 


TABLK  XIII.— Iron  (Ingot). 


I. 

II. 

III. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

VII. 

VIII. 

IX. 

Tem- 
perature 
tank. 

Date. 

No. 
transits. 

No.  Cd 
cells, 
n. 

Rise 
aliove 
*Pt. 

TangenU 
(uWissa- 
0°-1  C.). 

1  </0s 
n*  (//  ' 

Error 
per 
cent. 

" 



°0. 

12 

7 

0-112            131 

38405 

R  =  20-620 

0        24/11/12 

16 

6 

0-083 

175 

38370 

E-  1-0184(17'-5C.) 

24/11/12 

16 

5 

0-057 

377 

38402 

0-05 

M  =  2798-67 

25/11/12 

20 

6 

0-083 

175 

38339 

tw-  25-767 

18 

4 

0-037 

397 

38354 

8  —  0-1045 

• 

38374 

12/2/13 

17 

5 

0-026 

257 

38502 

R  =  20-625 

0 

18 

6 

0-046 

177 

38525 

0-03 

E  =  1-0184  (17°  -5  C.) 

18 

7 

0-062 

131 

38494 

M  =  2781-22 

m»  =  25-727 

38507 

8  =  0-1046 

23/2/13 

18 

7 

0-059 

128 

37958 

R  =  20-634 

10 

18 

6 

0-044 

173 

37980 

0-02 

E  =  1-01854  (13°  C.) 

18 

5 

0-032 

251 

37959 

M  =  2781-22 

m*  =  25-889 

37966 

8  =  0-1059 

24/2/13 

18 

6 

0-032 

257 

37948 

9-9 

18 

6 

0-047 

177 

37807 

All  same  as  23/2/13 

10 

7 

0-060           131 

37923 

0-11 

12 

8 

0-081            100 

37938 

8  =  0-1061 

37904 

31/1/13 

17 

6 

0-040           171           371C7 

R  =  20-638 

20-5 

31/1/13 

12 

7 

0-066            126           37168 

0-06 

E=  1-01843  (16'-5C.) 

1/2/13 

38 

4 

0-018           379           37176 

M  =  2781-22 

12 

8 

0-074             96           37182 

ms  =  20-638 

37171 

8  =  0-1078 

4/2/13 

12 

7 

0-060 

149 

37170 

Constanta    same    as    for 

21-5 

4/2/13 

17 

5 

0-029           287           37159       0'03 

20°-5C 

4/2/13 

18 

6 

0-042           269           37192 

—  0-1077 

37174 

Y    2 


164 


DR.   E.   H.  GRIFFITHS   AND  MR   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON   THE 


TABLE  XIII.  (continued). 


I. 

II. 

1 

HI. 

IV. 

V. 

VI.            VII. 

VIII. 

IX. 

Tem- 
perature 
tank. 

Date. 

No. 
transits. 

No.  Cd 
cells, 

H. 

Rise 
above 
°Pt. 

Tangents 
(abscissae 
O'-IC.). 

1  d0s 
tfW 

Error 
per 
cent. 

•c. 

24-5 

2/3/13 

18 

6 

0-045 

213 

37067 

R  =  20-642 

18 
18 

5 

7 

0-028 
0-055 

307 
156 

37073 
37080 

0-02 

E  =  1-0185  (15°  C.) 
M  =  2781-22 

ms  =  26-231 

37073 

8  =  0-1080 

19/1/13 

18 

7 

0-057 

128 

35705 

R  =  20-643 

50-3 

18 
18 

6 
5 

0-042 
0-029 

175 
254 

35729 
35701 

0-03      E  =  1-0184  (16°  C.) 
M  =  2798-67 

ms  =  26-938 

35712 

8  =  0-1105 

66-3 

7/12/12 

18 
18 
18 

4 
5 
6 

0-029 
0-048 
0-065 

756 
483 
339 

35363 
35167 
35410 

0-24 

R  =  20-635 
E  =  1-0184  (17°  C.) 
M  =  2798-67 

ms  =  27-299 

35313 

8  =  0-1112 

97-5 

9/10/12 

16 
16 
16 
12 

4 
5 
6 

7 

0-027 
0-037 
0-051 
0-069 

883 
565 
395 
289 

34248 
34226 
34238 
34243 

0-02 

R  =  20-622 
E=  1  -01838  (18°  C.) 
M  =  2798-67 

ms  =  27-798 

I 

34239 

8  =  0-1137 

CAPACITY   FOR   HEAT  OF   METALS  AT   DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES. 


165 


TABLE  XIV.— Zinc. 


L 

II. 

III. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

VIL 

VIIL 

IX. 

Tem- 
perature 
tank 

Date. 

No. 
transits. 

No.Cd 
cells, 

n. 

Rise 
above 
*Pt 

Tangents 
(ah*  !--.i- 
0--1C.). 

\de, 
«,~3T 

Error 
per 
cent 

"C. 

27/11/12 

16 

5 

0-062 

300 

47389 

R  =  20-620 

0 

27/11/12 

12 

6           0-090           209 

47314 

E-  1-0184  (17*  C.) 

27/11/13 

10             7           0  120           164           47367 

0-07 

M  =  2538-40 

27/11/12 

16             4           0-040           471            47307 

•V*  25-644 

28/11/12 

12 

7           0-120           154 

47271 



8  =  0-09150 

47330 

9/2/13 

18 

7           0-075 

143 

47219 

I!       L'o-61!! 

0 

18 

6 

0-056 

195 

47170 

0-04 

E-  1  -0184  (17'  C.) 

18 

5 

0-039 

281 

47209 

M  =  2538-4 

nu  =  25-582 

47199 

8  =  0-09180 

6/2/13 

37 

5 

0-039 

295 

4G335 

R  -  20-638 

18 

C           0-055 

100 

46383 

E=  1-0184  (16*  C.) 

21-6 

12 

7           0-075 

149 

46348 

0-03 

M  =  2538-4 

9 

8 

0-099 

116 

46330 

w«  =  26-231 

46349 

8  =  0-09265 

18 

6 

0-055 

205 

45210 

R  =  20-643 

22/1/13 

18 

7           0-077 

150 

45149 

E  =  1-0184  (16'  C.) 

50-5 

12 

8 

0-100 

115 

45196 

0-04 

M  =  2538-40 

18 

5 

0-038 

295 

45194 

ma  =  26-756 

18 

7 

0-077 

190 

45215 

14 

8 

o-ioo 

145 

45224 

8  =  0-09412 

* 

45198 

21/10/12 

17 

4 

0-029 

599 

43944 

R  =  20-621 

21/10/12 

18 

5           0-038 

382           43982 

E  =  1-01836  (18°  C.) 

97-4 

21/10/12 

20 

4 

0-029 

599 

43926 

M  =  2538-40 

21/10/12 

12 

6 

0-055 

265 

43980 

0-06 

nu  =  27-607 

21/10/12 

8 

7 

0-074 

194 

43947 

12 

6 

0-055 

265 

43876 

8  =  0-09534 

43942 

16/2/13 

17 

5 

0-039 

606 

44064 

R  =  20-6266 

97-4 

18 

6 

0-065 

420           44105 

0-05 

E=  1-0185  (14°  -5  C.) 

18 

7 

0-073 

308 

44055 

M  =  2538-40 

ing  =  27-488 

44076 

8  =  0-09507 

18/2  '13 

18 

6 

0-051 

505 

43401 

B=  20-609 

18 

5 

0-038 

725 

43446 

E=  1-0185  (13-5'  C.) 

123-4 

18 

7 

0-070 

370 

43582 

0-18     M-  2538-40 

12 

8 

0-088 

283 

43305 

»w  =  27-886 

43434 

8  -  0-09570 

166 


DR.    K.   H.   GRIFFITHS   AND   MR    EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON   THE 


TABLE  XV.— Silver. 


I. 

II. 

j   m 

IV. 

V.             VI. 

VII. 

VIII. 

IX. 

Tem- 
perature 
tank. 

Date. 

No. 
transits. 

i 

No.  Cd 
cells, 
n. 

Rise 
above 
*Pt. 

Tangents 
(abscissae 
O'-IC.). 

1  d0s 
1?  dt' 

Error 
per 
cent. 

•o. 

27/5/12 

18 

4 

0-048 

496 

52897 

R  =  20-599 

0 
AA 

18 
8 

6 
8 

0-106 
0-183 

220 
124 

52926 
52887 

0-02 

E  =  1-0185  (14°  C.) 
M  =  3733-10 

ms  =  23-443 

L, 

52903 

S  =  0  •  05560 

3/8/12 

19 

5 

0-054 

339 

51302 

R  =  20-627 

28-4 

19 
12 

6 
7 

0-078 
0-102 

235 
172 

51273 
51304 

0-02 

E=  1-0184  (16°  C.) 
M  =  3733-10 

ms  =  26-188 

51293 

8  =  0-05613 

18/9/12 

18 

4 

0-042. 

613 

50001 

18 

6 

0-092 

272 

50005 

R  =  20-635 

67-41 

12 

9 
19/9/12          9 

7 
8 
8 

0-123           201 
0-158           153 
0-159           153 

50017 
49908 
49986 

E  =  1-01848  (15°  C.) 
M  =  3733-10 
ms  =  27-056 

12 

7 

0-122           201 

50145 

18 

6 

0-090           273 

50024        0  •  07 

20/9/12        20 
21/9/12         10 

6 

8 

0-090           273 
0-159           153 

49963 
50016 

8=0-05680 

10 

8 

0-159           153 

50013 

10 

7 

0-123           201 

50054 

10 

7 

0-123 

201 

50009 

50011 

97-4 

13/10/12 

18 
12 
18 
18 

6 
7 

5 

4 

0-082 
0-111 
0-057 
0-037 

307 
227 
442 
692 

49098 
48970 
48991 
49018 

0-07 

R  =  20-621 
E  =  1-0184  (18°  C.) 
M  =  3733-10 
ms  =  27-564 

49019 

8  =  0-05737 

CAPACITY    FUK    HKAT   OF    METALS    AT    DIFKKKKVT   TKMl'KUATI  KKS.  1«7 


TABLK  XVI.— Cadmium. 


I. 

II. 

ni. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

VII. 

VIII. 

IX. 

Tem- 
[>erature 
tank. 

Date. 

No. 
transits. 

No.  Cd 
cells, 

Rise 
alx>ve 
'  Pt. 

Tangents 
O'-l  C.). 

*£ 

Error 
per 
cent. 

•o. 

12/5/12 

19 

4 

0-053 

595 

63811 

R  -  20-599 

0 

19 

6 

0-117 

266 

63852* 

0-03 

E-  1-0186  (15°  C.) 

AA 

10 

8 

0-202 

149 

63795 

M  -  3070-71 

nu  -  23-325 

L, 

63819* 

8  =  0-05468 

8/8/12 

19 

6 

0-080 

284 

61660 

R  -  20-627 

28-4 

11 

7 

0-107 

209 

61626 

E=  1-01847  (15*  C.) 

14 

7 

0-107 

209 

61629 

0-02 

M  =  3070-71 

19 

5 

0-068 

410 

61633 

nu  =  26-054 

61637 

8  =  0-06564 

29/12/12 

18 

5 

0-058 

415 

60193 

R  =  20-638 

12 

6 

0-082 

289 

60254 

E=  1-0184(17*0.) 

54-5 

8 

7 

0-113 

213 

60214  (mean) 

M  =  3070-71 

30/12/12 

18 

3 

0-019 

116 

60226 

*•-  26-718 

17 

4 

0-036 

648 

60229 

0-02 

10 

7 

0-113 

213 

8  =  0  05616 

60223 

16/10/12 

18 

4 

0-036 

784 

58408 

R  =  20-621 

97-64 

18 

5 

0-061            502 

58483 

E  =  1-01836  (18°  -50.) 

. 

16 

5 

0-061            491 

58303 

M  =  3070-71 

11 

6 

0-085           349 

58413 

0-07 

»w  =  27-437 

13 

6 

0-085           349           58404 

58402 

8  =  0-05714 

*  Omitting  6  cell  experiments  on  the  date  12/5/12,  we  hare  from  other  two  experiments 

8  =  0-05475. 


168 


DR.   E.   H.   CRIFFITHS  AND  MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 


TABLE  XVII.— Tin. 


I. 

II. 

m. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

VII. 

VIII. 

IX. 

Tem- 
perature 
tank. 

Date. 

No. 

transits. 

No.  Cd 
cells, 
n. 

Rise 
above 

Tangents 
(abscissie 

i  do* 

n*  dt  ' 

Error 
per 
cent. 

.» 

17/5/12 

18 
IK 

5 
4 

0-085 
0-055 

466 

728 

75254 
75209 

R  =  20-599 
E=  1-01851  (14°  C.) 

U 

5 

0-085 

466 

75309 

M  =  2591-49 

19/5/12 

8 
8 

6 
6 

0-123 
0-122 

323 
323 

75166 
75186 

ms  =  23  •  434 

7 

6 

0-122 

323 

75136 

0 
AA 

20/5/12 
21/5/12 

9 
19 
9 

7 
4 
8 

0-162 
0-056 
0-216 

237 
728 
182 

75250 
75126 
75240 

0-05 

• 

14 

5 

0-086 

466 

75225 

S  =  0-05363 

L, 

22/5/12 

9 
9 

8 

7 

0-216 
0-163 

182 
237 

75134 
75240 

26/5/12 

9 
9 

8 
8 

0-217 
0-216 

182 
182 

75105 
75233 

75201 

28-4 

9/8/12 

12 
12 

7 
6 

0-118 
0-087 

235 
318 

72122  (mean) 
72081 

R=  20-627 
E  =  1-0185  (16°  C.) 

19 

5 

0-062 

459 

72107 

0-02 

M  =  2591-49 

14 

7 

0-118 

235 

ms  =  26-169 

72103 

S  =  0-05465 

2/1/13 

16 

4 

0-038 

793 

17 

4 

0-038 

793 

70292  (mean) 

R  =  20-638 

18 

5 

0-059 

508 

70308  (    „    ) 

E=  1-0184(17°-5C.) 

53-9 

12 

6 

0-089 

352 

70296  (    „    ) 

o-oi 

M  =  2591-49 

3/1/13 

9 

7 

0-120 

258 

70317 

ms=  26-798 

13 

6 

0-089 

352 

18 

5 

0-059 

508 

80-05549 

70303 

19/10/12 

10 

5 

0-065 

541 

67819 

K  =  20-621 

12 

5 

0-065 

541 

67809 

E  =  1-01836(18°-6C.) 

97-6 

9 

6 

0-088 

375 

67704 

0-09 

M  =  2591-49 

20/10/12        10 

6 

0-088 

375           67603 

ms  =  27-580 

18 

4 

0-042 

844 

67645 

SO-  05690 

67716 

CAPACITY   FOR   HEAT  OF   METALS   AT   DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES. 


169 


TABLE  XVIIL— Lead. 


I. 

n. 

III. 

IV. 

V. 

VI 

VII. 

VIII. 

IX 

Tem- 
perature 
tank. 

Date. 

No.  of 
transits. 

No.  (M 
cells, 

«. 

UN 

above 
•Pt. 

Tangents 
•te  IMSJ 
O'-IC.). 

1  dO, 

»*~3T 

Error 
por 

.  ,   !.I. 

"0. 
0 

20/6/12 

23/6/12 
23/6/12 
29/6/12 
29/6/12 

18 

12 
12 
9 

9 
8 
18 
12 
8 

4 

5 
5 
6 
6 
7 
7 
3 
7 
8 

0-062 
0-093 
0-094 
0-135 
0-132 
0-178 
0-175 
0-034 
0-176 
0-229 

813 
521 
521 
355 
362 
266 
266 
1443 
291 
222 

84253 
84462 
84294 
84577 
84461 
84504 
84324 
84550 
84406 
84679 

0-09 

R-  20-599 
E-  1-0184  (16*  C.) 
M  -  4016-56 
mt  -  23-442 

S       0  03020 

84441 

28-38 

5/8/12 

19 
12 
19 
19 

5 

6 
4 
5 

0-060 
0-074 
0-038 
0-052 

508 

371 
835 
508 

81440 
81231 
81334 
81238 

0-08 

R.  20-627 
E  -  1-0184  (16"  C.) 
M  =  4016-56 
ww-  26-148 

81311 

8  =  0-03053 

51 

23/12/12 

17 

18 
18 
12 
20 
12 

5 
4 
3 
6 
5 
6 

0-065 
0-041 
0-026 
0-093 
0-065 
0-093 

B01 

949 
161 
280 
553 
280 

80008  (mean) 
80118 
79838 
79808  (mean) 

0-19 

R  -  20-639 
E=  1-01841  (17"  C.) 
M  =  4016-56 
•»-  26-786 

8  =  0-03073 

79938 

57 

13/12/12 

18 
18 

3 
4 

0-020 
0-037 

151 
931 

Intersection  of 
the  two  lines. 

R  =  20-638 
E=  1-01840  (17-5°  C.) 
M  =  4016-56 
ms  =  26-743 

79710 

8  =  0  03078 

67-4 

22/9/12 

18 
12 
18 
18 
20 
20 
13 

5 

6 
4 
5 
5 
4 
6 

0-070 
0-105 
0-045 
0-070 
0-070 
0-045 
0-105 

562 
390 
879 
562 
562 
879 
390 

78743 
78681 
78561 
78515 
78579 
78715 
78603 

78629 

0-07 

R  =  20-635 
E  =  1-01846  (15-5'  C.) 
M  -  4016-56 
m*  =  27-056 

S       0  03102 

97-45 

15/10/12 

18 
18 
12 
9 
10 
13 

S 
4 

5 
6 
6 
5 

0-025 
0-044 
0-067 
0-097 
0-097 
0-067 

177 
990 
633 
441 
441 
633 

77252 
77532 
77632 
76991 
77298 
77448 

77358 

0-19 

R  -  20-621 

E  -  1-01838  (18*  C.) 
M  =  4016-56 
w.«  =  27-587 

8  =  0  03127 

VOL.    COXIII. — A. 


,„;.    ,.;.    II.   CIMFFITHS   AND    Ml!.    KXKIJ   CKIFHTHS  ON   THE 


SECTION  XII. 

Summary  of  Results.     Copper. 
The  validity  of  our  methods  was  rigorously  tested  by  the  determinations  of  the 

specific  heat  of  copper  at  0°  C. 

We  have  already,  in  the  previous  sections,  discussed  the  various  changes  mad. 
during  the  course  of  these  experiments,  and  the  table  below  summarises  the  results. 

TABLE  XIX. 


Method. 

No. 
of  experi- 
ments. 

Observed 
error 
per  cent. 

Remarks. 

Specific  heat. 

12 

0-03 

Thermometers    AB,    CD    (see 

0-09084 

Table  II.) 

3 

0-03 

Thermometers  A  A,  BB  

0-09095 

"  Intersection  method  "  .  . 

4 

0-05 

Thermometers  AA',  BB'  ;  heavy 
lid;  Decembers,  1912 

0-09098 

"  Intersection  method  "  .  . 

5 

0-08 

Thermometers  AA',  BB'  ;  light 
lid;  Decembers,  1912 

0-09088 

"  Intersection  method  "  .  . 

6 

0-03 

Thermometers  AA',  BB'  ;  heavy 
lid  ;  July  23-25 

0-09079 

"  Intersection  method  "  .  . 

5 

o-oi 

Thermometers  AA,  BB  ;  light 
lid  ;  June  3 

0-09094 

"  Intersection  method  "  .  . 

12 

0-04 

Thermometers  AB,  CD.    Inter- 
section  method    applied   to 
1st  group 

0-09081 

Giving  equal  weight  to  each  group,  we  have 

S0  =  0*09088 ±0'000047,  i.e.,  probable  error  =  0'05  per  cent. 

In  Tables  XX.  to  XXVII.  we  summarise  our  final  conclusions. 

Messrs.  Johnson  and  Matthey  state  that  the  previous  treatment  of  all  the  metals, 
except  copper  and  iron,  was  as  follows  :— 

''The   cylinders   in   every  instance  were  cast,  and    then    allowed  to  cool,  sub- 
sequently being  turned  in  a  lathe,  they  were,  not  annealed." 


CAPACITY   FOR   HEAT   OF    MFTAI.S   AT   DIFFERENT  TEMPEKATI'IM  > 


171 


The  data  supplied  by  the  manufacturers  indicate  that  the  physical  condition  of  the 
iron  is  probably  distinct  from  that  of  the  other  metals,  and  this  may  to  some  extent 
account  for  the  marked  difference  in  the  rate  of  change  of  its  S  and  0  curve  over  the 
range  0"  C.  to  100°  C.,  as  compared  with  the  remaining  curves. 

We  are  desirous  of  maintaining  the  iron  in  its  present  condition  until  we  have 
invest  i<,';i»f<l  its  l*'li;i\  imir  ut  low  temperatures,  but  we  hope  eventually  to  ascertain 
the  effect  of  careful  annealing  on  this  specimen. 

TABLE  XX. — -"Copper. 
Weight,  3392  grms.     Density,  8"922. 


Temperature    

0*C 

28°-42C 

63"-52C 

67"-32C 

97*-4C. 

S  (experimental  value)  

0-09088 

0-09230 

0-09366  t 

0-09387 

0-09521 

1  MfTerence  from  curve  per  cent.    .     . 

0 

+  0-09 

-0-13 

-0-07 

0 

S,  =  0-09088  (H-0'0005341^  -  0'00000048(!!'). 

This  copper  was  electrolytically  deposited. 
Mr.  C.  T.  HEYCOOK  writes  as  follows  :— 

"  Cu  =  99*95  per  cent.     Remaining  0"05  per  cent,  consists  of  Pb,  Fe,  and  a  very 
little  SiOj.     You  will  1x3  correct  in  stating  that  it  is  of  high  purity." 

TABLE  XXI. — Aluminium. 
Weight,  954  grms.     Density,  2704. 


Temperature  

0"C. 

28°-35C. 

Bl'-OC. 

97'-48C. 

S  (experimental  value)  

0-20957 

0-21471 

0-21842 

0-22482 

Difference  from  curve  per  cent.  .     . 

0 

0 

0 

o 

S,  =  0-20957  (l  +  0-0009161*-0'00000m3). 
Messrs.  Johnson  and  Matthey  state  : — 

"  Aluminium  we  have  reason  to  believe  to  be  exceptionally  pure,  say  99'90  per 
cent.,  with  traces  of  iron." 

With  the  exception  of  one  group  of  three  at  0°  C.,  these  experiments  were  extremely 
satisfactory,  so  much  so  that  the  fifth  figure  appears  to  have  some  real  significance. 
The  perfect  agreement  of  the  experimental  and  the  curve  values  is  very  noticeable. 

z  2 


172 


DR.   F,    II.   r.KIFFITHS   AND   MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS   OX   THK 


TABLE  XXII. — Iron  (Ingot). 
Weight,  2798  grms.     Density,  7 '8 58. 


Temperature     .... 

O'C. 

10°  -OC. 
and 
9°'9C. 

(mean) 

20°-5C. 

21°-6C. 

24°-6C. 

50"-3C. 

66°-3C. 

97°-5C. 

S  (experimental  value)   . 

0-1045 

0-1060 

0-1078 

0-1077 

0-1080 

0-1105 

0-1112? 

0-1137 

Difference  from  curve"! 
per  cent.     .    .     .     .  J 

0 

0 

+  0-22 

+  0-10 

0 

-0-22 

-0-99 

+  0-10 

S,  =  G'1045  (l+0-001520<-0-000006m2)- 

This   specimen   was   obtained    from    the   American    Rolling    Mill    Company,   who 
state : — 

"  Material  rolled  from  an  ingot  into  a  billet  (4  inches  by  4  inches),  on  '  Blooming 
Mill ' ;  billet  forged  into  round  section  at  blacksmith's  shop.  Same  had  no 
further  annealing  nor  additional  heat  treatment,  other  than  when  rolled 
and  forged." 

Specimen  turned  down  to  size  in  laboratory  workshop. 

"  Sample  from  which  material  was  taken  and  forged  shows  following  analysis  :— 

Cu  =  0'040  per  cent. 
O  =  0'015 
N  =  0-0026 


'  S  =  0'021  per  cent. 
"  P  =  0-005 
"  C  =  0-012 
"  Mn  =  0-036 


H  =  O'OOOS 


"  Silicon,  trace  ;  Fe  (by  diffi),  99'87." 

Our  sincere  thanks  are  due  to  the  American  Rolling  Mill  Company,  Middletown, 
Ohio,  U.S.A.,  for  presenting  us  with  this  sample. 

TABLE  XXIII.— Zinc. 

Weight,  2538  grms.     Density,  7-141. 


Temperature    .... 

0°  P, 

01°.  K    p 

C/\°  .  fr    /I 

OU      0  U. 

97    4  O. 

•4  L. 

S  (experimental  value)  . 

0-0917R 

0-ftQOfiK 

0.  AQ,4  T  O 

09521 

09i)70 

Difference  from  curve  per  cent.    . 

0 

-0-14 

+  0-19 

-0-01 

+  0-08 

S,  =  0-09176 


CAPACITY   FOR  HEAT  OF   METALS   AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  178 

Messrs.  Johnson  and  Matthey  state  :— 
"  Approximately,  99'95  per  cent.  Zn." 

The  agreement  between  the  results  on  repetition  at  the  same  temperature  was  less 
satisfactory  than  usual,  the  extreme  difference  from  the  adopted  value  at  0°  C.  being 
0'3  per  cent,  (see  Table  XIV.). 

TABLE  XXIV.— Silver. 
Weight,  3733  grins.     Density,  10'45G. 


Temperature        

0°C. 

28°-41  C. 

67'-40C. 

97°-44C. 

S  (experimental  value)  

0-05560 

0-05613 

0-05680 

0-05737 

Difference  from  curve  per  cent.  .     . 

0 

0 

0-07 

+  0-07 

S,  =  0-05560  (I  +  0-000339W  -O'OOOOOOHIf*). 

Messrs.  Johnson  and  Matthey  state  :— 
"  Better  than  999 '9  fine." 

At  0°  C.  two  series  of  experiments  by  "  total  heat "  method  were  performed— 

With  thermometers  AB,  CD,  ten  experiments ;  probable  error, 

±0'05  per  cent. ;  S  =  0'05551. 

With  thermometers  AA,  BB,  six  experiments ;  probable  error, 

±0'04  per  cent.  ;  S  =  0'05575. 

TABLE  XXV.— Cadmium. 

Weight,  3070  grms.     Density,  8T>52. 


Temperature  

0°C. 

28°-34C. 

54-5'C. 

97'-64C. 

S  (experimental  value)  

0-05475 

0-05554 

0-05616 

0-05714 

Difference  from  curve  per  cent.  .     . 

0 

0-02 

-0-04 

0 

S,  =  0' 


+  0>000520<-01000000725J:I). 


|7)  ,„..    ,.;.    n.    GRIFFITHS   ANI>    MR.    EZER   GRIFFITHS   ON   THE 

Messrs.  Johnson  and  Matthey  state  : — 

"  Fully  99-75  per  cent,  pure,  with  very  '  slight  traces  of  iron  and  zinc.' ' 
Series  of  four  total  heat  experiments  at  0°  C.,  with  probable  error  of  ±0'08  per 
M,,t.  gave  S  =  0-05468.  TiBLE  XXVI._Tin. 

Weight,  2591  grms.     Density,  7 '292. 


0"C. 

28*'4C. 

53°-9C. 

97"-6C. 

S  (experimental  value)  

0-05363 

0-05465 

0-05549 

0-05690 

Difference  from  curve  per  cent.  .     . 

0 

+  0-02 

-0-02 

+  0-02 

S,  =  0'05863  (1  +  0-0006704<-0'000000458«3). 

Messrs.  Johnson  and  Matthey  state  : — 

"  Probably  analyse  to  99'80  per  cent.,  with  trifling  quantities  of  arsenic,  lead, 


and  iron." 


TABLE  XXVII— Lead. 
Weight,  4016  grms.     Density,  H'341. 


O'C. 

28°-38C. 

51°-OC. 

67°-4C. 

97°-45C. 

8  (experimental  value)  

0-030196 

0-03053 

0-03073 

0-03102 

0-03127 

Difference  from  curve  per  cent.    .     . 

0 

0 

-0-16 

+  0-19 

-0-03 

S,  =  G'030196  (1  +  0'000400<- 0-00000036^). 

Messrs.  Johnson  and  Matthey  state  : — 

"  Approximate  to  99'90  per  cent.,  with    inappreciable    traces   of    arsenic   and 
bismuth." 

The  "probable  error"  of  the  various  groups  with  this  metal  is  higher  than  in  the 
case  of  other  metals.  This  is  probably  an  effect  of  the  low  conductivity  of  lead  and 
the  consequent  steepness  of  the  thermal  gradient  within  the  cylinder. 


Fig.  8  represents  the  increments  in  specific  heat  over  the  range  0°  C.  to  100°  C.,  on 
the  assumption  that  the  specific  heat  at  0°  C.  for  each  metal  is  represented  by  unity. 

We  had  hoped  to  present  curves  showing  the  actual  values  of  the  specific  heat  over 
this  range,  but  the  scale  required  was  so  large,  that  we  found  that,  if  reduced  to  the 
size  necessary  for  reproduction,  they  were  of  little  value. 


CAPACITY    F()l;    IIKAT   <>F    MKTAI.S    AT    MFFKKKNT   TKMI'KKATPKKS.  175 


I-IO 


1-09 


J 


20° 


60  • 

•      Temperiture. 


80° 


ioo» 


120" 


Fig.  8.     Variation  with  temperature. 
(Assuming  specific  heat  at  0*  C.  aa  unity.) 

A  noticeable  decrease  in  the  increment  of  the  specific  heat  of  zinc  is  observable  at 
temperatures  above  50°  C.,  which  may  have  some  connection  with  its  change  in  physical 
properties,  as  zinc  becomes  malleable  about  120°C.  For  this  reason  we  pushed  our 
examination  of  this  metal  up  to  a  temperature  of  123°  C. 


Our  thanks  are  due  to  the  Court  of  the  University  of  Wales  for  a  grant  towards 
the  purchase  of  the  specimens  of  metals. 

We  are  greatly  indebted  to  Mr.  EDGAR  A.  GRIFFITHS,  of  this  College,  for  his  help 
in  the  construction  of  apparatus  and  in  the  conduct  of  the  experiments. 

SECTION  XIII. 
Discussion  of  the  Results  of  NERNST'S  Observations  at  Low  Tempi- ratures. 

[After  the  preceding  paper  was  written,  it  was  suggested  to  us  that  we  should 
discuss  the  relation  between  our  experiments  over  the  range  0°  C  to  100"  C.  and 
those  of  N ERNST  at  lower  temperatures.  We  feel,  however,  that  a  discussion  of  this 
kind  would  carry  more  weight  after  the  completion  of  our  own  work  at  temperatures 
below  0°  C. 


17'J 


DR.  K.  H.  GRIFFITHS  AND  MR.  EZKR  GRIFFITHS  ON  TIN-: 


IM-..MI  tlie  brief  description  of  the  method  published*  by  NKRNST,  it  is  impossible  to 
estimate  the  magnitude  of  any  errors  arising  from  the  neglect  of  the  loss  or  gain  by 
iM.liatiun,  &c.  It  must  be  remembered  that  boiling  liquid  air  is  not  at  a  steady 
temperature  and  therefore  the  metal  block  suspended  within  the  envelope  could  not 
settle  to  the  temperature  of  the  surroundings  ;  hence,  observations  of  the  temperature 
after  switching  off"  the  heating  current,  afford  little  information  concerning  losses  or 
gain  by  radiation. 

NERNST'S  experiments,  however,  had  one  great  advantage  over  those  of  other 
observers  at  lower  temperatures,  inasmuch  as  the  ranges  of  temperature  employed 
were  small,  e.g.,  27°  C.  When  we  consider  the  curvature  of  the  specific  heat  curve, 
it  is  evident  that  changes  of  temperature  of  the  order  of  100°  C.  and  upwards  can 
give  little  accurate  information  as  to  the  value  at  the  centre  of  such  ranges.  Two 
metals,  only,  appear  to  have  been  examined  by  N  ERNST,  namely,  lead  and  silver.  For 
lead  he  obtained  the  values  of  the  atomic  heat  given  in  column  II.  below  ;  column  III. 
gives  the  values  calculated  from  the  modified  EINSTEIN'S  formula 


(A) 


=  3K 


where  11  is  the  gas  constant,  equal  to  1'985  gr.-calories. 

For  lead 

a  =  58,         &  =  7'8xlO-5. 

In  column  IV.  we  give  values  obtained  by  extrapolation  of  the  parabolic  formula 
representing  the  locus  of  our  specific  heat  curve  0°  C.  to  100°  C.,  (see  p.  174  supra). 


ATOMIC  HEAT. — Lead. 


I. 

II. 

III. 

IV. 

Absolute  temperature. 

NERNST'S  observed 
value. 

Calculated  from 
formula  (A). 

Calculated  from 
GRIFFITHS'  parabolic 
formula. 

62 
66 
79 
93 

5-63 
5-68 
5-69 
5-76 

5-58 
5-63 
5-75 
5-84 

5-62 
5-64 
5-68 
5-73 

Mean  .  .  75 

5-69 

5-70 

5-67 

*  'Journal  de  Physique,'  tome  he.,  1910,  p.  721. 


CAPACITY   FOR   HKAT  OF   METALS   AT   I>Il  IT.K'KNT  TEMPERATURES. 


177 


Tt  will  be  seen  that  for  the  purpose  of  representing  the  experimental  results,  there 
is  little  to  choose  between  the  two  formulae,  the  greatest  difference  from  our  parabolic 
formula  being  less  than  1  per  cent,  which  NKRNST  states  to  be  the  probable 
experimental  error  in  his  observations. 

The  greatest  divergence  between  NERNST'S  results  and  the  modified  EINSTEIN'S 
formula  amounts  to  1'4  per  cent.,  and  it  must  be  remembered  that  the  empirical  term 
bT3"  in  that  formula  was  added  as  a  consequence  of  these  experimental  numbers. 

Thus  it  appears  that,  in  the  case  of  lead,  the  simple  parabolic  formula  holds  over 
the  range  62°  C.  to  373°  C.  absolute. 

In  the  case  of  silver,  NERNST  records  five  observations  (column  II.,  iitfrci). 

ATOMIC  HEAT. — Silver. 


L 

II. 

IIL 

IV. 

Absolute  temperature. 

NEKNNT'S  observed 
value. 

Calculated  from 
formula  (A). 

Calculated  from 
GRIFFITHS'  parabolic 
formula. 

64 

3-72 

3-61 

84 

4-43 

4-44 

— 

86 

4-40 

4-60 



200 

5-73 

6-78 

5-84 

208 

6-92 

5-81 

5-86 

If  we  consider  the  group  about  200°  C.,  we  have  the  following  results  :— 

At  204°  C.  absolute- 
Mean  observed  value 5'83 

Calculated  (EINSTEIN'S  modified  formula) 5 '80 

(GRIFFITHS'  parabolic  formula) 5 '84 

Here,  again,  the  conclusions  of  the  different  observers  are  in  close  agreement. 

At  the  still  lower  temperatures,  the  decrease  in  the  observed  values  is  so  marked 
that,  assuming  the  validity  of  NERNST'S  values,  the  parabolic  formula  cannot  possibly 
hold  good,  and  we  can  only  conclude  that  some  marked  change  takes  place  in  the 
nature  of  the  curve  below  200°  C.  absolute. 

We  hope  to  investigate  the  values  of  the  capacity  for  heat  of  silver  at  some 
intermediate  points  in  the  large  gap  between  the  groups  determined  by  NERNHT. 

In  conclusion,  it  is  notable  that,  with  the  exception  of  three  observations  upon 
silver  taken  at  closely  adjacent  temperatures,  all  the  values  obtained  by  NERNST  fall 
(within  the  margin  of  probable  experimental  error)  upon  the  loci  of  the  parabolas 
which  express  our  experimental  results  at  higher  temperatures.] 

VOL.  ocxili. — A.  2  A 


178 


ni;   K.  H.  GRIFFITHS  AND  MR.  EZER  GRIFFITHS  ox  THE 


APPENDIX  I. 

The  hypothesis  of  DULONG  and  PETIT  has  undoubtedly  been  of  great  service  to 
chemists ;  nevertheless,  it  is  acknowledged  that,  at  best,  it  is  but  approximately  true 
and  that  whatever  value  of  the  constant  is  assumed,  the  number  of  exceptions  at 
ordinary  temperatures,  especially  in  the  case  of  elements  of  small  atomic  weights, 
entitles  us  to  regard  it  as  an  indication  of  a  probability  rather  than  as  a  valid 

generalization. 

Let  us  consider  the  values  it  would  yield,  at  0°  C.,  if  we  apply  it  to  the  metals 
whose  specific  heats  we  have  dealt  with  in  this  communication,  arranged  in  order  of 
their  atomic  weights,  assuming  that 

Atomic  weight  x  specific  heat  =  6'25. 
TABLE  XXVIII. 


I. 

II. 

III. 

IV. 

6-25 

Element. 

Our  value  at  0°  C. 

Column  II.  -  Column  III. 

atomic  weight 

Al 

0-2306 

0-2096 

+  0-02100 

Fe 

0-1119 

0-1045 

+  0-00740 

Cu 

0-09832 

0-09088 

+  0-00744 

Zn 

0-09561 

0-09176 

+  0-00385 

Ag 

0-05794 

0-05560 

+  0-00234 

ca 

0-05560 

0-05475 

+  0-00085 

Sn 

0-05252 

0-05363 

-0-00111 

Pb 

0-03018 

0-03020 

-0-00002 

The  increase  in  the  numbers  in  column  IV.,  as  the  atomic  weights  diminish,  is  very 
noticeable. 

If  we  plot  the  experimental  values  (column  III.,  supra)  as  ordinates  and  the  atomic 
weights  as  abscissae,  the  points  lie  very  evenly  about  a  smooth  curve  of  an  exponential 
type  ;  Cu  being  rather  low,  Zn  rather  high,  and  Sn  decidedly  high. 

In  order  to  obtain  an  expression  for  the  curve,  assume  (column  III.)  the  following 
values  : — 

Al  =  0'209G  ;     mean  of  Cu  and  Zn  =  0'09132  ;     and     Pb  =  0'03020. 

Then  the  curve  drawn  through  these  three  points  will  be  found  to  follow  closely  a 
mean  path  through  the  above  experimental  values. 
The  expression  for  this  curve  is 

S  =  4'804xa-u'(*, 


CAPACITY   FOR  HEAT  OF   METALS  AT  IMFFF.KF.NT  TEMPERATURES.  17'.) 

TAIU.B  XXIX. — (The  elements  arranged  in  the  order  of  their  atomic  weights.) 


I. 

II.                       III. 

Observer  and  data  indicating  how  values  in 
Column  III.  were  obtained. 

I. 

•Uement. 

s, 

8  =  4-  804  x  a"9*,     experimental 
values  at  0*  C. 

Element. 

H 

4-8(i| 

2*402                 .Toi.Y,  at  constant  volume 

H: 

He 

1--J90 

0  •  762                Deduced  from  (1)  C,,  -  C.  -  j  ;  (2)  £*  =  1  •  652 

He 

Li 

0-763 

0-778                BERNINI,  0°  to  19°  -  0-837;  0*  to  100°  =  1-098 

Li 

B 

0-492 

0*251                  Mean  of  values  deduced  from  Koi'i*  and  Mois           B 

SAN  and  GAITIKR  (amorphous) 

C 

0-453 

0-113 

As  diamond,  WKBKM,  at  11* 

C 

N 

0-391 

0*175                PIER,  at  constant  volume 

N 

0 

0-344 

0*170 

HIM.  BORN       and       AUSTIN       (Reichsanstalt) 

O 

C»  -  0  •  2320  ;  y  =  1  •  400  (Lummer) 

Na 

0-244 

0-291  1              BERNINI,  at  10°-  0-297  ;  at  128*  -  0-333 

Na 

Mg 

0-232 

0-234 

VOIOT,    18°    to    99'  -0-246;     STCCKKR    at 

oor»*  A.  owl 

Mg 

Al 

0-2092 

£ift*j      »   \r    fuj  i 

0-2096                    I'KIFFTTHS' 

Al 

Si 

0-201 

0-1771 

WEBER,   at  57*  =  0-183;    at  232*  -  0-203 

Si 

(Cryst.) 

P 

0-184 

0-188 

(Yellow),  RBT.NAULT,  -78°  to  +10°  -  0-17  ; 

P 

KOPP  13°  to  36"  =  0-202 

Cl 

0-162 

0*08591 

STRECKKR  gives  Cff  =  0*1155  over  16°  to  343° 

Cl 

and  y  =  1  *  322  ;  CB  reduced  to  0" 

K 

0-148 

0-1671 

Data    uncertain.      ScHttz,    0*166    at    -27°; 

K 

REONAULT,  0-  165  at  -  39" 

A 

0-145 

0-0738 

DlTTENBERGER,        C,,   =   0*123;         NlKMEYER, 

A 

y-  1-667 

Fe 

0-1052              0-1047 

GRIFFITHS' 

Fe 

Ni 

0-1003              0-1004 

BEHN,   -186"  to    +18"  =  0-086;     +18°  to 

Ni 

+  100°  «=  109  ;  TILDKN  at  0°  =  0-  1007 

Co 

0-1000              0-099 

TII.DKN,    -182°  to  +15°  =  0-082;    +15°  to 

Co 

100°  =  0-103;  15°  to  630°  =  0'123 

Cu 

0-0929               0-0909 

GRIFFITHS' 

Cu 

Zn 

0-0905               0-0917 

Zn 

As 

0-0795              0-0778 

BKTTENDORFF  (Cryst.),  21°  to  68°  =  0-0830; 

As 

amorphous,  21°  to  65°  =  0'076 

Kr 

0-0723              0-0359 

Cp-C,  =  ?;  £*=  1-666 

Kr 

Pd 

0-0569              0-057                BEHN,     -186°~"to     +18*   =0-053;     18"    to 

Pd 

100°  -  0-059 

Ag 

0-0563               0-0556 

GRIFFITHS' 

Ag 

(M 

0-0541               0-0547 

Cd 

Sn 

0-0512               0-0536 

Sn 

Sb 

0-0608               0-0499 

GAEDK,  17°  to  92°  =  0-0508;  temperature  co- 

Sb 

efficient  from  NACCARI,  =  0-000016 

Cs 

0-0462               0-0482 

ECKARDT  and  GRAEFK,  at  13* 

Cs 

Pt 

0-0319               0-0314 

BKHN,    -186°  to   +18*   =  0-0293;     +18°  to 

Pt 

100°  -  0-0324 

Hg 

0-0313                                      |  Liquid  by  BARNKS  ;  for  solid  see  WATSON 

Hg 

Tl 

0-0307               0-0308 

SCHMITZ,    -192°  to   +20°  =  0-0300;    20    to 

Tl 

+  100°  =  0-0326 

Pb 

0-0303               0-0302 

GRIFFITHS' 

Pb 

Bi 

0-0302              0-0300             GIEBK,  -186°  =  0-0284;  WATERMAN  +22°  to 

Bi 

100°  -  0-0304 

U 

0-0265               0-02741             BLUMCHE,  at  49°  (0°  to  98°).     Assume  decrease 

U 

like  Pb 

2  A  2 


I  Ml 


|>K.    K.    (I.    CKIKK1TIIS    AND    MR.    KZKK   GRIFFITHS   ON    TIIK 


Hence,  if  a  =  1,  we  obtain  S  =  4'804,  that  is,  just  twice  the  value  found  by  JOLY 
for  the  specific  heat  of  hydrogen  at  constant  volume. 

We  have  endeavoured  to  ascertain  how  nearly  the  values  obtained  from  this 
expression  are  in  harmony  with  the  conclusions  of  other  observers  in  the  case  of 
elements  not  included  in  our  list.  It  is  difficult,  however,  in  regard  to  the  majority  of 
the  elements,  to  consider  any  conclusion  thus  arrived  at  as  decisive.  The  determinations 
in  the  case  of  the  rarer  elements  have  been  made  with  such  small  quantities  that  the 
results  are  open  to  suspicion,  and,  but  few  investigators  have  so  arranged  their  tempe- 
rature ranges  as  to  include  0°  C.  Where  values  of  S  for  different  values  of  6  have  been 
given,  we  have,  on  the  assumption  that  the  changes  are  of  a  linear  order,  deduced 
the  probable  values  at  0°  C.,  and  in  Table  XXIX.,  p.  179,  we  have  indicated  the 
authority  and  the  temperature  ranges  from  which  those  Values  were  deduced.  Where 
no  data  for  such  a  reduction  can  be  found,  we  have  inserted  any  values  which  fall  near 
0°  C.,  together  with  the  mid- temperature  and  the  experimental  range.  For  example, 
Cs  13°  C.  (EcKARDT,  0°  C.  to  26°  C.).  We  have  given  all  the  information  we  have 

TABLE  XXX. 


Column  I. 

Column  II. 

Per  cent. 

Per  cent. 

differences. 

differences. 

H 

0 

He 

f  15-0 

Li 

+  2-0 

N 

-10-0? 

0 

-1-2 

Cl 

+    6-0 

5? 

+  0-9 
0 

Na 
K 

+  16-0? 
+  11-0? 

P 

+  2-2 

Sn 

+    4-6 

A 

+  1-9 

Cs 

f   4-01 

Fe 

-0-5 

Ni 

0 

Co 

-1-0 

Cu 

-2-2 

Column  HI. 

Zn 

+  1-3 

As 

-2-3 

Kr 

-0-7 

Pd 

0 

-1-2 
+  1  .  i 

Calculated.         Experimental  values. 

Sb 

i   i 
-1-6 

Pt 
Tl 
Pb 
Bi 

-1-6 
+  0-3 
-0-3 
0-6 

B 
C 

Si 

0-492                 0-251 
0-452                 0-113 
0-201                 0-177 

U 

+  3-01 

Hg 

0-0313               0-0335  (liquid) 
0-0314  (solid) 

Sum  of  per  cent.  \ 
differences        /  ! 

CAPACITY   FOR   HEAT  OF   MKTAI.S   AT   DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  181 

iible  to  gather,  ooooeraing  the  specific  heats  of  the  elements,  which  appeared  to 
us  to  carry  sufficient  weight  to  render  the  deduced  values  of  any  service  in  such  an 
enquiry  ;  many  of  those  included  should,  tor  the  reasons  given  in  the  introduction  to 
this  paper,  he  regarded  as  rough  approximations  only.  No  element  has  l>een  omitted 
in  connection  with  which  any  satisfactory  evidence  concerning  the  specific  heat  at  0°  C. 
was  obtainable. 

In  column  I.  of  Table  XXX.,  p.  180,  we  enumerate  those  elements  in  which  the 
agreement  between  the  calculated  and  the  experimental  values  may  be  regarded  as 
close  (i.e.,  within  3  per  cent.),  and  we  have  in  each  case  indicated  the  percentage 
difference  and  its  sign. 

In  column  II.  we  place  those  in  which  the  differences  vary  from  3  to  16  per  cent., 
including  some  in  which  the  probable  error  may  be  of  like  dimensions  ;  in  column  III., 
those  experimental  results  which  differ  so  greatly  from  the  calculated  as  to  exclude 
the  possibility  of  agreement.  In  the  case  of  gases,  the  experimental  values  are 
multiplied  by  2. 

Remarks  on  Columns. 

Column  I. — The  sum  of  the  differences  (  —  0'5)  and  the  distribution  of  the  signs 
show  that  the  experimental  values  are  very  evenly  distributed  about  the  locus  of  the 
curve. 

Column  II. — The  experimental  values  of  N,  Na,  and  K  do  not  appear  to  be 
sufficiently  established  to  lend  much  weight  to  the  results. 

The  experimental  value  of  the  specific  heat  of  tin  at  0°  C.,  as  compared  with  that 
of  other  metals  examined  by  us,  is  high.  It  is  a  significant  fact  that  tin,  at 
temperatures  below  0°  C.,  tends  to  revert  into  the  grey  powder  form. 

[Since  the  above  was  written,  we  have  made  determinations  of  the  specific  heat  of 
sodium  at  0°  C.  Two  different  samples  were  used,  and  the  results  were  in  close 
agreement,  giving  the  value  0'2863  for  the  specific  heat. 

The  few  experiments  at  higher  temperatures  (50°  C.)  indicate  that  the  increase  in 
specific  heat  with  temperature  is  considerably  greater  in  the  case  of  sodium  than  in 
the  other  metals  examined  by  us,  and  is  of  the  order  of  O'll  per  cent,  per  I8  C. 

In  this  connection  it  should  be  remembered  that  sodium  has  the  lowest  melting- 
point  of  all  the  metals  considered  in  the  above  table.] 

Column  III. — Two  curious  coincidences  present  themselves.  The  calculated  value 
of  C  is  almost  exactly  four  times  that  of  the  diamond. 

The  mean  experimental  value'  for  amorphous  B  is  closely  half  of  the  calculated  one. 

It  has  been  shown  (see,  for  example,  Al  and  Pb  supra)  that  the  rate  of  change  of 
SS/S9  as  6  changes,  varies  markedly  for  different  elements  ;  hence,  any  relation  such  as 
that  denoted  by  the  equation  S  =  4'804  x  a~°'*,  which  holds  true  for  any  given  tempe- 
rature, cannot  be  valid  at  other  temperatures.  There  are,  therefore,  serious  difficulties 
in  the  way  of  accepting  any  definite  connection  between  "  S  "  and  "  a  "  at  an  arbitrary 


I>R    E.    H.    CRIFFITHS    AND    MR.    KZER   GRIFFITHS   OX    THE 


temperature  such  as  0°  ('.,  although  it  is  probable  that  a  large  majority  of 
are  in  a  stable  condition  at  that  temperature. 

It  is,  however,  evident  that  the  curve  S*  =  4'804xa~"'!l5  yields  throughout  the 
whole  range  of  atomic  weights  values  of  S  (of  2S  in  the  case  of  gases)  which,  in  the 
large  majority  of  cases,  are  within  2  per  cent,  of  the  most  probable  values. 

We  prefer  to  postpone  any  expression  of  our  views  on  this  matter  until  we  are  able 
to  ascertain  the  results  of  our  experiments  at  low  temperatures. 


The  Relation  between  S  and  6. 

The  curves  given  in  fig.  8  show  that  the  curvature  from  0°  C.  to  100°  C.  is  far 
more  marked  in  the  case  of  Fe  and  Al  than  in  any  of  the  remaining  metals,  with, 
perhaps,  the  exception  of  Zn  at  the  higher  temperatures.  If  we  produce  backwards 
the  paralwlas  whicli  have  been  found  to  represent  the  mean  paths  over  the  above 
range,  it  is  found  that  the  curves  of  Al  and  Fe  (if  they  continue  of  the  same  character) 
must  cross  those  of  the  remaining  metals  before  the  temperature  falls  to  absolute 
zero. 

If  we  venture  to  extrapolate,  in  order  to  ascertain  the  values  of  S  given  by  the 
respective  parabolic  equations  at  -273°  C.,  we  obtain  the  numbers  given  in  column  II., 
Table  XXXI. 

TABLE  XXXI. 


Element. 

S  at  -  273°  C. 

Atomic  heat  at  -  273°  C. 

Al 

0-1306 

3-540 

Fe 

0-0131 

0-730 

Cu 

0-07438 

4-728 

Znt 

0-06554 

4-294 

Ac 
f^ 

0-04986 

5-378 

Cd 

0-04402 

4-948 

Sn 

0-04199 

4-997 

Pb 

0-02186 

4-527 

Mean  of  all  but  Al  and  Fe    .     .     . 

=  4-813 

It  appears  possible  that  the  values  of  the  specific  heats  of  the  last  six  metals  may 
ontinue  to  follow  the  parabolic  paths  as  the  temperature  falls  to  -273°  C.,  for  an 

1  The  expression,  atomic  heat  =  4  •  804  x  <.<><*  is  obviously  an  alternative  manner  of  expressing  the 
same  relation. 

t  In  the  case  of  Zn,  the  equation  is  deduced  from  values  found  from  0°  C.  to  50-5  C.,  for  reasons 
given. 


CAPACITY   FOR   HEAT  OF    MI.TAI.S   AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  183 

exceedingly  small  error  in  their  coefficients  over  the  range  0°  C.  to  100'  C.  would 
account  for  considerable  discrepancies  in  the  values  of  their  Atomic  Heats  at  absolute 
zero,  the  more  especially  as  the  resulting  values  of  S  are  multiplied  by  factors  ranging 

IV.  mi  63  to  200. 

Experimental  errors,  however,  could  not  account  for  such  divergent  results  as  those 
given  by  Al  and  Fe,  hence  either  the  atomic-heat  curves  of  these  two  metals  undergo 
change  at  low  temperatures,  or  their  values  at  absolute  zero  must  be  lower  than  that 
of  the  others  in  the  above  list. 

If  we  assume  the  continuity  of  the  paths  of  the  six  metals  above  referred  to  and 
deduce  their  respective  specific  heats  at  -273°C.  from  the  mean  atomic  heat  (4'813),and 
for  the  other  two  points  on  the  parabola  employ  the  values  at  0°  C.  and  100°  C.,  we 
obtain  the  following  equations  (t  being  expressed  in  the  absolute  scale)*  :— 

Cu  .     .     .     .  S  =  0'0758    (1+0-0008352«-0'00000039JJ), 

Zn  .     .     .     .  S  =  0-07374  (l+0-0011155«-0-000000807t3), 

Ag  .     .     .     .  S  =  G'0447    (l+0-00122A-0-00000122<a), 

Cd  .     .     .     .  S  =  0-0429    (l+O-OOlSSSGf-O'OOOOOHSG^), 

Sn  .     .     .     .  8  =  0-0405    (1  +  0'0014514<-0-0000009665**), 

Pb  .....  S  =  0-02327  (1  +  0-001544<-0-00000166«*). 

If  the  values  of  S  at  the  various  temperatures  at  which  it  was  determined  by  us  are 
now  tleduced  from  these  equations,  it  will  be  found  that  the  differences  between  the 
experimental  and  the  calculated  values  are  very  small,  in,  no  instance  exceeding  0'3  per 
cent.,  and  in  most  cases  much  less. 

The  remarkable  approximation  between  the  hypothetical  value  of  the  atomic  heat 
at  0°  C.  (4'804)  of  a  body  with  atomic  weight  1,  and  the  likewise  hypothetical  value 
of  the  atomic  heat  of  this  group  of  metals  at  al«olute  zero  (4'813),  is  probably  a 
coincidence,  but  may  possibly  be  of  some  significance. 


APPENDIX  II. 

An  inspection  of  the  atomic  heats  of  the  metals  investigated  by  us  indicates  that 
those  of  low  melting-points  have  high  atomic  heats.  This  is  true  throughout  the 
range  0°  C.  to  100°  C.,  if  the  values  at  any  given  temperature  within  that  range  are 

*  Many  equations  of  MI  exponential  nature,  and  also  of  the  forms  suggested  by  Professor  PKRRY 
(•Phil.  Trans.,'  vol.  194,  pp.  250-255)  have  been  investigated,  but  none  of  them  fitted  the  experimental 
results  so  closely  as  the  parabola. 


184 


DR.   E.    H.   CRTFFITHS  AND  MR.   EZER  GRIFFITHS  ON  THE 


considered.  It  thus  appears  as  if  there  was  some  relation  between  the  temperature 
..f  the  melting-points  and  the  atomic  heats. 

In  rig.  'J  the  atomic  heats  at  50°  C.  have  been  plotted  as  onlinates,  and  the 
melting-points  as  abscissae. 

This  temperature  was  selected  for  comparison  as  the  most  reliable  data  given  by 
other  observers  have  been  obtained  over  temperature  ranges  including  50°  C.  as  a 
mean. 


8-0 

Li 

. 

\     * 

g    ^ 

1 

?   \ 

«, 

\ 

1    3T>0 

\ 

\ 

M 

\ 

|   6-5 

yrv 

>^ 

+Fb 

1    6-0 

Bt 

M^ 

Zn 

Sb 

Ca 

^ 

Au 

'Al 

S 

POO 


100°        20O°        300° 


400°        500°        600°       700° 
»•  Melting   Points. 

Fig.  9. 


800°        900°       1,000°    IJOO0 


[Determinations  made  by  us  since  the  communication  of  this  paper  to  the  Society 
give  the  value  of  the  atomic  heat  of  sodium  at  50°  C.  as  7 '01,  in  place  of  the  value 
7 '37  shown  in  the  diagram,  this  latter  number  having  been  based  on  the  values  of 
NORDMEYER  and  BERNOUiLLi  between  -185°  C.  and  +20°  C.  (5'38),  and  BERNINI'S 
at  +10°  C  (6'83)  and  +128°  C.  (7'66).] 


APPENDIX  III. 

Soldering  Glass  to  Metal. 

The  process  is  identical  for  glass,  quartz  and,  no  doubt,  for  porcelain. 

The  end  of  the  glass  or  quartz  tube  is  painted  with  a  solution  of  platinum  chloride 
in  a  volatile  oil.  (Solution  is  sold  under  the  trade  name  of  Liquid  Platinum,  No.  1.) 

The  coating  is  very  gently  heated  at  first,  and  the  temperature  slowly  increased, 
until  all  the  volatile  matter  has  been  driven  off  and  a  brilliant  film  of  platinum 
obtained.  The  higher  the  temperature  to  which  the  tube  is  raised,  the  better  the 
adherence  of  the  film.  The  tube  should  glow  with  a  dull  red  light,  before  being 


CAPACITY   FOi;   Hi  AT  OF  METALS  AT  DIFFERENT  TEMPERATURES.  185 

allowed  to  cool.  If  a  thick  film  is  desired,  additional  coatings  can  be  given.  Care 
should  be  taken  to  prevent  contamination  by  flame-gases  ;  if  this  occurs  the  surface 
should  be  brightened  by  means  of  ordinary  metal  polish. 

The  next  step  is  to  "  tin  "  the  surface,  and  this  requires  care.  The  tube  is  gently 
heated  and  rubbed  with  a  lump  of  resin  ;  the  solder  melted  on  with  a  clean  soldering 
iron  which  should  be  only  sufficiently  hot  to  just  melt  the  solder.  With  care  the 
entire  platinised  surface  may  be  coated  with  an  irregular  coating  of  solder.  Vigorous 
rubbing  of  the  surface  with  the  soldering  iron  should  be  avoided,  as  it  would  probably 
tear  the  film  away  from  the  glass. 

The  tube  is  then  ready  to  be  soldered  into  the  metal  ferrule  which  should  be 
"  tinned  "  on  the  inside. 


VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  2   B 


V.  On  the  General  llieory  of  Elastic 
I '.a  R.  V.  SOUTH  \VI-.M,.  Ji.A.,  Fellow  of  Trinity  College,  Cambridge. 

Communicated  by  Prof.  A.  E.  H.  LOVE,  f'./f.N. 

« 

Received  January  4, — Read  January  30,  1913. 

CONTENTS. 

Page 
Introduction  and  summary  of  paper 187 

EQUATIONS  OF  NEUTRAL  EQUILIBRIUM  IN  RECTANGULAR  CO-ORDINATFA 

Method  of  derivation 190 

Example  in  rectangular  co-ordinates.     Stability  of  thin  plating  under  edge  thrust 198 

EQUATIONS  OF  NEUTRAL  EQUILIBRIUM  IN  CYLINDRICAL  CO-ORDINATES. 

Derivation  of  the  equations 202 

Kxamplea  in  cylindrical  co-ordinates.  Stability  of  trailer  flues  and  tubular  struts 208 

Solution  for  boiler  flue  without  end  thrust 217 

Comparison  with  experimental  results 222 

Validity  of  investigation  by  the  theory  of  thin  shells 224 

Comparison  with  existing  formula! 225 

The  "  critical  length  " 226 

Solution  for  tubular  strut.  Special  case 227 

Validity  of  investigation  by  the  theory  of  thin  shells 230 

Solution  by  the  theory  of  thin  shells.  General  case 231 

Comparison  with  existing  formula1 236 

Stability  of  tubes  under  combined  end  and  surface  pressure 236 

GENERAL  THEORY  OF  INSTABILITY  IN  MATERIALS  OF  FINITE  STRENGTH. 

The  practical  value  of  a  theory  of  instability 237 

Stability  of  short  struts 242 

Need  for  further  research.    Conclusion 244 

Introduction  and  Summary  of  Paper. 

PROBLEMS  which  deal  with  the  stability  of  bodies  in  equilibrium  under  stress  are  so 
distinct  from  the  ordinary  applications  of  the  theory  of  elasticity  that  it  is  legitimate 
to  regard  them  as  forming  a  special  branch  of  the  subject.  In- every  other  case  we 

VOL.  COXIII. A    501.  2    B    2  Published  Mpantcly,  August  6,  1913. 


188    MR  R  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

are  concerned  with  the  integration  of  certain  differential  equations,  fundamentally 
the  same  for  all  problems,  and  the  satisfaction  of  certain  boundary  conditions ;  and 
by  a  theorem  due  to  KIKCHHOFF*  we  are  entitled  to  assume  that  any  solution  which  we 
may  discover  is  unique.  In  these  problems  we  are  confronted  with  the  possibility  of 
two  or  more  configurations  of  equilibrium,  and  we  have  to  determine  the  conditions 
which  must  be  satisfied  in  order  that  the  equilibrium  of  any  given  configuration  may 
I  »•  stable. 

The  development  of  both  branches  has  proceeded  upon  similar  lines.  That  is  to 
say,  the  earliest  discussions  were  concerned  with  the  solution  of  isolated  examples 
rather  than  with  the  formulation  of  general  ideas.  In  the  case  of  elastic  stability,  a 
comprehensive  theory  was  not  propounded  until  the  problem  of  the  straight  strut  had 
been  investigated  by  EuLER.t  that  of  the  circular  ring  under  radial  pressure  by 
M.  LEVY}  and  G.  H.  HALPHEN,§  and  A.  G.  GREENHILL  had  discussed  the  stability  of 
a  straight  rod  in  equilibrium  under  its  own  weight,  ||  under  twisting  couples,  and  when 
rotating.^ 

In  a  paper  which  has  become  the  foundation  of  the  theory  in  its  existing  form,** 
G.  H.  BRYAN  has  brought  these  isolated  problems  for  the  first  time  within  the  range 
of  a  single  generalization.  Examining  the  conditions  under  which  KIRCHHOFF'S 
theorem  of  determinacy  may  fail,  he  was  led  to  the  conclusion  that  instability  is  only 
possible  in  the  case  of  such  bodies  as  thin  rods,  plates,  or  shells,  and  in  these  only 
when  types  of  distortion  can  occur  which  do  not  involve  extension  of  the  central  line 
or  middle  surface,  so  that  it  is  legitimate  to  discuss  any  problem  in  elastic  stability 
by  methods  which  have  been  devised  for  the  approximate  treatment  of  such 
bodies.  He  showed,  moreover,  that  the  stability  of  the  equilibrium  of  any  given 
configuration  depends  upon  the  condition  that  the  potential  energy  shall  be  a 
minimum  in  that  configuration. 

A  closer  examination  of  BRYAN'S  theory  suggests  that  some  of  the  conclusions 
which  have  l«en  drawn  from  it  are  scarcely  warranted.  The  contention  that  no 
closed  shell  can  fail  by  instability,  because  any  distortion  would  involve  extension  of 
the  middle  surface,  will  be  discussed  later.ft  For  our  present  purpose  it  is  sufficient 
to  remark  that  the  whole  theory  is  based  upon  the  assumption  that  the  strains 
occurring  previously  to  collapse  must  be  kept  to  the  extremely  narrow  limits  within 
which,  in  the  case  of  ordinary  materials,  HOOKE'S  Law  is  satisfied.  This  assumption, 
of  course,  expresses  a  restriction  necessarily  imposed  upon  the  range  of  practical 

A.  E.  H.  LOVE,  'Mathematical  Theory  of  Elasticity '  (second  edition),  §118. 
t  '  Hist.  Acad.  Berlin,'  XIII.  (1757),  p.  252. 
}  'LiouviLLE's  Journal,'  X.  (1884),  p.  5. 
§   'Comptes  Rendus,'  XCVIII.  (1884),  p.  422. 
II   'Proc.  Camb.  Phil.  Soc.,'  IV.  (1881),  p.  65. 
H  'Proc.  Inst.  Mech.  Eng.,'  1883,  p.  182. 
**  'Proc.  Camb.  Phil.  Soc.,'  VI.  (1888),  p.  199. 
tt  Cf.  pp.  222,  236. 


MR.  R.  V.  SOUTH  WKI.L  ON  THK  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    189 

problems  which  can  he  treated  by  the  ordinary  theory  of  elasticity ;  but  it  is  not 
legitimate  to  conclude  that  instability  is  only  possible,  even  if  its  conditions  were  only 
calculable,  in  the  case  of  materials  which  obey  HOOKE'S  Law,  and  there  is  no  warrant 
for  tin-  rmployment  of  "crushing  formulae"  in  the  design  of  short  struts  and  thick 
boiler  flues.* 

A  more  serious  weakness  in  the  existing  theory  of  elastic  stability,  when  regarded 
from  tin-  mathematical  standpoint,  is  the  fact  that  the  methods  which  it  employs  are 
admittedly  only  approximate.  The  higher  the  elastic  limitt  of  the  material  under 
consideration,  the  less  adequate  are  these  methods  to  deal  with  the  whole  range  of 
problems  which  should  come  within  its  scope.  In  fact,  we  are  faced  with  the 
anomaly  that,  while  in  its  ordinary  applications  the  theory  of  elasticity  is  not 
concerned  with  the  conception  of  an  elastic  limit,  in  questions  of  stability  the 
existence  of  finite  limits  is  an  essential  condition  for  the  adequacy  of  its  results.  In 
an  ideal  material,  possessing  perfect  elasticity  combined  with  unlimited  strength, 
types  of  instability  could  occur  with  which  existing  methods  would  be  quite 
insufficient  to  deal. 

The  theory  of  elastic  stability  is  thus  in  much  the  same  position  as  that  of  the 
ordinary  theory  of  elasticity  before  the  discovery  of  the  general  equations,  and  oue 
aim  of  the  present  paper  is  to  remedy  its  defects  by  the  investigation  of  general 
equations,  which  may  be  termed  "  Equations  of  Neutral  Equilibrium,"  and  which 
express  the  condition  that  a  given  configuration  may  be  one  of  limiting  equilibrium. 
These  equations  are  universally  applicable  only  to  ideal  material  of  indefinite  strength, 
and  the  possibility  of  elastic  break-down  must  receive  separate  investigation ;  but 
they  are  also  applicable,  even  with  materials  of  finite  strength,  to  any  problem  which 
comes  within  the  restrictions  imposed  by  BRYAN'S  discussion,  and  therefore  enable  us 
to  test  the  accuracy  of  his  treatment  of  problems,  such  as  that  of  the  boiler  Hue,  for 
which  the  ordinary  Theory  of  Thin  Shells  has  been  thought  insufficiently  rigorous.^ 

In  every  problem  of  this  paper  it  is  found  that  the  Theory  of  Thin  Shells  gives  a 
solution  which  is  correct  as  a  first  approximation,  and  the  practical  advantage*  of  the 
new  method  of  investigation  are,  therefore,  not  immediately  apparent.  But  it  must 
be  remembered  that  the  approximate  theory  of  thin  plates  and  shells  has  not  as  yet 
been  rigorously  established,  and  that  much  work  has  recently  lx;en  undertaken  with 
the  object  of  testing  it  by  comparison  with  accurate  solutions  of  isolated  problems.§ 
Now  in  finding  conditions  for  the  neutrality  of  the  equilibrium  of  any  given 
configuration  we  are  at  the  same  time  obtaining  the  solution  of  a  statical  problem ; 
for  a  configuration  of  slight  distortion  from  the  equilibrium  position  will  also  be  one 

*  W.  C.  UNWIN,  '  Elements  of  Machine  Design  '  (1909),  Part  I.,  p.  Ill ;  S.  E.  SI/XJUM,  "The  Collapse 
i  >f  Tubes  under  External  Pressure,"  '  Engineering,'  January  8,  1909. 

t  By  "elastic  limit"  is  intended,  here  and  throughout  this  paper,  the  limit  of  linear  elasticity. 

J   I'f.  pp.  210,  224. 

§  LOVE,  op.  tit.,  Introduction,  p.  29,  and  Chapter  XXII. 


100    MR.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEOKY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

of  equilibrium.  Hence  every  solution  which  we  can  obtain  will  add  to  the  number 
of  these  "  test  cases,"  which  has  not  hitherto  included  solutions  for  any  but  plane 
plates. 

A  far  more  important  advantage  of  the  new  method,  from  the  practical  point  of 
view,  is  the  accuracy  with  which  it  follows  the  actual  "  stress  history "  in  a  body 
which  fails  by  instability  under  a  gradually  increasing  stress.  In  cases  where 
instability  precedes  elastic  break-down  this  difference  of  method  is  not  important ; 
but  for  the  discussion  of  instability  in  overstrained  material,  where  the  stress-strain 
relations  are  intimately  dependent  upon  the  previous  stress  history,  its  introduction 
is  absolutely  necessary. 

The  extension  of  EULEB'S  theory  to  struts  of  practical  dimensions  and  materials, 
which  forms  the  conclusion  of  this  paper,  suggests  a  large  and  new  field  for 
investigation.  The  number  of  similar  cases  which  can  be  treated,  in  the  existing 
state  of  our  knowledge  of  plastic  strain,  is  very  small,  and  indications  are  given  below 
of  the  questions  which  still  require  an  answer ;  there  is  reason  to  believe  that  the 
requisite  experimental  research  would  not  present  insuperable  difficulties,  and  that 
we  may  hope  in  the  future  to  obtain  an  adequate  theory  of  experimental  results 
which  are  at  present  very  little  understood. 

EQUATIONS  OF  NEUTRAL  EQUILIBRIUM  IN  RECTANGULAR  CO-ORDINATES. 

Method  of  Derivation. 

The  question  of  stability  arises  in  regard  to  any  system  in  which  there  is  a 
possibility  of  slight  displacement  from  the  configuration  of  equilibrium.  This  possi- 
bility may  be  afforded  either  by  a  more  or  less  limited  degree  of  mechanical  freedom — 
in  which  case  the  problem  is  one  of  statical  stability,  and  practically  unaffected  by 


Fig.  1. 

the  tendency,  which  any  actual  body  displays,  to  distort  under  the  influence  of 
applied  forces  ;  or  it  may  be  due,  more  or  less  entirely,  to  this  tendency.  In  the 
latter  case  the  problem  is  one  of  elastic  stability,  and  must  be  treated  by  distinct 
methods.  There  is,  however,  no  essential  difference  between  the  two  types  of 


ME.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    191 

instability,  and  a  general  discussion  of  the  elastic  type  may  be  very  conveniently 
illustrated  by  reference  to  a  mechanical  example. 

In  this  connection  we  may  consider  the  system  illustrated  by  fig.  1,  in  which  a 
uniform  heavy  sphere  rests  in  equilibrium  within  a  hemispherical  l>owl,  under  the 
action  of  its  own  weight  and  of  the  pressure  exerted  by  a  pointed  plunger,  which  is 
free  to  move  in  a  vertical  line  through  the  centre  of  the  bowl.  This  system  has  been 
chosen  for  the  illustration  which  it  affords  of  collapse  under  a  definite  "  critical 
loading."  In  this  it  bears  an  unusual  resemblance  to  examples  of  elastic  instability — 
the  stability  of  most  mechanical  systems  being  dependent  solely  upon  the  relative 
dimensions  of  their  members.  In  the  absence  of  friction,  we  find  that  the  equilibrium 
will  Income  unstable  as  the  load  on  the  plunger  is  increased  through  a  critical  value 
given  by  Wr 

P'  =  R^' 

W  is  the  weight  of  the  sphere, 

r  is  the  radius  of  the  sphere, 

R  is  the  radius  of  the  bowl. 

The  above  solution  rests  upon  the  assumption  that  the  sphere,  bowl  and  plunger 
are  absolutely  smooth  and  rigid,  and  the  possibility  of  slight  displacement  is  afforded 
by  the  freedom  of  the  sphere  to  take  up  any  position  of  contact  with  the  bowl.  To 
discuss  the  equilibrium  of  the  sphere  in  the  position  illustrated  we  must  consider  the 
forces  which  act  upon  it  in  a  position  of  slight  displacement.  These  include  two 
systems,  one  tending  to  restore  the  initial  conditions,  the  other  tending  to  increase 
the  distortion,  and  stability  depends  upon  the  relative  magnitude  of  the  two  effects. 
We  may  investigate  the  problem  by  three  methods,  fundamentally  equivalent,  which 
are  described  below  : — 

(1)  TJie  Energy  Method. — We  may  derive  expressions  for  the  potential  energy  of 

the  system  in  a  position  of  slight  displacement  from  the  equilibrium  position. 
The  condition  of  stability  requires  that  the  expression  for  the  potential  energy 
shall  have  a  minimum  value  in  the  equilibrium  position. 

(2)  The  Method  of  Vibrations. — We  assume  that  the  slight  displacement  has  been 

effected  by  any  cause,  and  investigate  the  types  of  vibration  possible  to  the 
system  when  this  cause  is  removed.  The  condition  of  stability  requires  that 
all  such  types  shall  have  real  periods. 

(3)  The  Statical  Method. — We  confine  our  attention  to  the  special  case  in  which 

the  stability  of  the  equilibrium  position  is  neutral.  In  this  case  there  must 
exist  some  type  of  displacement  for  which  the  collapsing  and  restoring 
effects,  discussed  above,  are  exactly  balanced,  so  that  it  may  be  maintained 
by  the  original  system  of  applied  forces.  We  have,  therefore,  to  find 
conditions  for  the  equilibrium  of  a  configuration  of  small  displacement,  under 
the  given  system  of  applied  forces. 


192    MB.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

Any  of  these  methods  is  valid  for  the  investigation  of  elastic  stability,  and  all  have 
in  fact  been  employed,  the  displacement  considered  being  that  of  the  central-line  or 
mi.  Idle-surface  of  the  rod  or  shell,  and  the  resultant  actions  over  cross-sections  being 
derived  in  terms  of  this  displacement,  by  the  approximate  theory  first  suggested  by 
KIROHHOFF.  The  third  method  is  generally  found  to  be  preferable,  and  is  the  basis 
of  the  investigation  to  be  described  below,  but  the  actual  procedure  will  be  found  to 
possess  one  or  two  novel  features. 

In  the  first  place,  an  endeavour  will  be  made  to  dispense  with  the  assumption  that 
elastic  break-down  occurs  at  very  small  values  of  the  strains  ;  instead,  we  shall  deal 
with  an  ideal  material  possessing  perfect  elasticity  combined  with  unlimited  strength. 
Such  a  material  could  not  fail,  unless  by  instability,  and  our  problems  will  no  longer 
be  confined  to  thin  rods,  plates,  or  shells.  It  follows  that  we  can  only  obtain  sufficient 
accuracy  in  our  conditions  for  neutral  stability  by  deriving  them  with  reference  to  a 
volume-element  of  the  material. 

Further,  since  instability  will  in  some  cases  not  occur  until  the  strains  in  the 
material  have  reached  finite  values,  we  shall  have  to  introduce  an  unusual  precision 
into  our  ideas  of  stress  and  strain.  The  discussion  of  finite  strain  is  merely  a  problem 
in  kinematics,  and  has  been  worked  out  with  some  completeness*  ;  but  the  corre- 
sponding stress-strain  relations  in  our  ideal  material  are  necessarily  less  certain,  since 
they  must  be  based  upon  experiments  in  which  only  small  strains  are  permissible. 

For  example,  if  we  assume  that  HOOKE'S  Law  is  satisfied  at  all  stresses,  we  must 
decide  whether  our  definition  of  stress  is  to  be 

T  .   FTotal  action  over  an  element  of  surface"! 


or 


Original  area  of  that  surface          J 

T  .   ["        Total  action  over  the  surface        ~l 
'  LArea  of  that  surface  after  distortionj  ' 

For  the  ordinary  purposes  of  elastic  theory  the  two  definitions  may  be  regarded  as 
equivalent,  and  the  distinction  is  too  fine  to  be  settled  experimentally.  In  the 
absence  of  any  generally-accepted  molecular  theory  which  might  indicate  the  correct 
result,  it  seems  legitimate  to  make  the  simplest  possible  assumptions  which  do  not 
involve  self-contradictions,  and  which  yield  the  usual  results  when  the  strains  are 
very  small. 

It  may  be  shown  t  that  in  a  distortion  of  any  magnitude  three  orthogonal  linear 
elements  issue  from  any  point  after  distortion,  which  were  also  orthogonal  in  the 
unstrained  configuration,  and  that  these  linear  elements  undergo  stationary  (maximum 
or  minimum  or  minimax)  extension.  Hence  an  elementary  parallelepiped  constructed 
at  the  point,  with  sides  parallel  to  these  linear  elements,  undergoes  no  change  of 
angle  in  the  distortion.  It  is  clear  that  only  normal  stresses  will  act  upon  its  faces 

For  a  discussion  of  the  theory,  with  references,  see  LOVE,  op.  at.,  Appendix  to  Chapter  I. 
t  LOVE,  op.  cii.,  $  26,  27. 


MR.  i;.  V.  sorTinvKU,  ON  THK  (JKNERAL  THKORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    193 

after  distortion,  and  that  if  tli.-se  stresses  be  expressed  in  terms  of  the  extensions  of 
the  sides  we  have  complete  relations  between  stress  and  strain. 

We  shall  therefore  assume  that  these  principal  stresses  and  principal  strains, 
irtottever  their  magnitude,  arc  <-n,,n. •<•/,-,/  I,,/  //,,•  ,„•,//„„,•,,  i-rfimf,',,,,.^  ../'  I[O<>KK'S  L«\i-; 
that  is  to  say,  if  the  extensions  in  the  principal  directions  are  elt  e»  est  and  the 
corresponding  stresses  are  R,,  H3.  Tt:i,  then 


where  E   is  YOUNG'S  Modulus,  and  —  is   POISSON'S    ratio   for    the    material    under 

m 

consideration. 

These  relations  may  be  written  in  the  form 


20 

.......     (2) 


m-2L 
where  C  is  the  Modulus  of  Rigidity. 

In  these  relations  the  measure  of  extension  is  assumed  to  be 

Increase  in  length  of  linear  element 
Length  of  the  element  tafore  strain  ' 
and  of  stress* 

Total  action  over  an  element,  of  surface 
Area  of  the  element  before  strain 

We  have  then  the  usual  expression!  for  the  energy  of  strain,  per  unit  volume  of  the 
unstrained  material,  in  terms  of  the  principal  extensions,  viz.:— 

i 

(3) 


The  above  assumptions  yield  sufficient  data  for  the  calculation  of  the  stress  system 
in  any  configuration  of  equilibrium,  even  when  the  strains  are  not  small.  Assuming 
that  the  calculation  has  been  effected,  we  have  to  show  how  conditions  for  the 
stability  of  the  system  may  be  obtained. 

We  must  distinguish  three  configurations :  the  unstrained  configuration,  in  which 
the  co-ordinates  of  any  point  are  given  by  x,  y,  z ;  the  configuration  of  equilibrium 
under  the  stress-system,  the  stability  of  which  we  are  investigating ;  and  a  configu- 

'  This  assumption  is  open  to  the  objection  that  it  would  render  possible  the  compression  of  a  material 
to  zero  volume  by  means  of  a  finite  stress.  It  will  not,  however,  introduce  any  serious  error,  and  has  the 
advantage,  which  more  probable  assumptions  do  not  possess,  of  leading  to  a  definite  energy -function. 
Tin-  definitions  of  stress  and  strain  given  alwve  are  generally  employed  in  the  construction  of  "  straw- 
~tr:iin  diagrams"  from  a  tension  test,  the  extensions  of  the  specimen  being  taken  as  abscissa;,  and  the 
total  loads  as  ordinates  of  the  plotted  curve, 
t  LOVE,  np.  ci/.,  §  68. 

VOL.  CCXIII.  —  A.  2    C 


Mi:    I,'.   V.  sol  Tl  I  \VKLL  OX  Till.  HKXKRAL  THKOKY  OF  KLASTIC  STABILITY. 


ration  of  sli^lit  distortion  from  the  equilibrium  position,  which  can  be  maintained 
ivithout  the  introduction  of  additional  stress  at  the  boundaries,  if  the  equilibrium  of 
the  second  configuration  is  neutral.  We  shall  consider  first  a  stress-system  which  is 
such  that  the  principal  stresses  in  the  second  configuration  have  the  same  magnitudes 
and  directions  throughout  the  body  ;*  and  we  shall  take  these  directions  as  axes  of 
x,  y  and  z.  We  may  then  define  the  second  and  third  configurations  by  saying  that 
in  them  the  co-ordinates  of  the  point  (x,  y,  z)  become 


and 


respectively.  We  shall  not  limit  the  values  of  et,  e3,  ?3,  although  in  practical  cases 
they  must  be  small :  u',  i/,  «/  are  infinitesimal.  In  the  second  configuration  the  axes 
Ox,  Oy,  Oz  are  directions  of  principal  stress,  and  the  stresses  are 

2C 
X,  =  — gKni-lJcj  +  Cj  +  eJ,  ...,&c (2.)  bis 

In  the  third  configuration  we  shall  find  that  lines  which  in  the  first  configuration 
were  slightly  inclined  to  Ox,  Oy,  Oz  become  directions  of  principal  stress  and  strain. 
The  final  extension  of  a  line  which  originally  had  direction-cosines  /,  m,  n  is 


It  may  be  shown  that  e'  has  a  stationary  value  when 


(!+«,) 


m  =  m,  = 


and 


(i+«i)=! 

»  I/     *S— 


n  =  n,  = 


(5) 


to  terms  of  the  first  order  in  n',  v',  w/.t 

In  some  cases,  such  as  GRRENHIU/S  problem  of  the  stability  of  a  heavy  vertical  rod  (p.  188,  footnote), 
i  necessary  to  allow  for  variation  in  one  or  more  of  the  principal  stresses ;  the  necessary  alterations  are 
easily  made,  and  as  they  are  not  required  for  the  examples  of  this  paper  their  consideration  would  involve 
unnecessary  complexity. 

A,l,M  May  1.— The  approximation  of  these  expressions  is  insufficient  if  any  two  of  the  principal 
(«i,  «*,  «s)  in  the  second  configuration  are  equal ;  in  this  case  additional  terms  must  be  retained  in 
denominators.    The  equilibrium  under  hydrostatic  stress  (,,  =  e,  =  «,)  is  necessarily  and  obviously 
stable.] 


Mi;,  i;    V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  SI  ABII.ITY.     195 

Thus  the  line  initially  given  by  the  direction-cosines 

1,     m,,     n}, 

liecumes  a  direction  of  principal  stress  in  the  final  configuration.     Its  direction-cosines 
(referred  to  Ox,  O#,  and  Oz)  are  then 


1, 


or 


,ai/ 


,<'"' 


1, 


: (6) 


which  we  shall  write  as  1,  m',,  »', ;  and  its  final  extension,  to  terms  .if  the  first  order 
in  ?/',  /•',  /'•',  is 

'  '  "'  lv\ 


In  the  same  way  we  find  that  the  other  directions  of  principal  strain   in  the  final 
configuration  are  given  by  the  direction-cosines 


- 


- 


and 


_ 


- 


(1  +,>,)»-(! 


(which  we  may  write  as  — wi',,  I,  u'2,  and  —  u',,  —>*'»,  1),  and  that  the  final  extensions 
in  these  directions  are 


and 


— . 


The  stresses  in  these  directions,  which  we  shall  call  the  directions  of  JT', 
referred  to  the  original  areas  of  the  faces  on  which  they  act,*  are  therefore 


,  and  zf, 


,     v  ^  ax,  s«'  .  axr  ar'  .  ax,  a«/ 

.  i  —  Ar  +  —  —  .  -r  —  T   -       .  -T—  +  -r      .  -r     , 
8<>,     ?a:       ce,     dy       oc,     dz 


(.0) 


*  ('/.  the  assumption  of  p.  193. 
2  O  2 


MR.  R.  V.  sorrmVKI.I.  ONT  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

to  the  new  areas  of  the  faces  on  which  they  act,  they  are 

Xi                                          V' ,                                         7' , 
•V/  *  y "/'       _  **  i 


X»     _ 
»    - 


Y'   = 
1  » 


(1+^, 


and  to  the  required  degree  of  approximation  we  may  write 

x'  x,       r      i    a*/     i    a*//] 

•"•  *      i \~n \    ^  —  r    —  •  "^ —          ~  •  ~T — 

( 1  +  c2)  ( 1  +  <'3)  L       1  +^i    oy      1+  6»     vz  J 


20 


m—2         f/        -,\dit'  .  dv'  ,  dw'~\         , 

+  7—  —  :    (m-l)-T—  +  -T-+  -T-    ...,  &c.     .     .     .     (11) 

(l-fp2)(l+«-:!)L  3*      3«/       3«  J 

Then  if  a;,  y,  z  denote  the  co-ordinates  in  the  final  configuration,  referred  to  the 
original  axes,  of  the  point  which  was  originally  at  (x,  y,  z),  so  that 


x  = 


t/,  ...,  &c., 


we  may  find  the  stress  components  in  the  third  configuration,  referred  to  the  original 
axes,  and  to  the  strained  areas  of  the  faces  upon  which  they  act,  by  the  scheme  of 
transformation 


X 


y 


x 


y1 


z' 


The  following  expressions  are  thus  obtained  (to  the  required  order  of  approxima- 
tion) : — 

X;  =  X'X,  Y-  =  Y',,  Z;  =  Z'.,, 


(1 


«,) 


,  ...,  &c. 


(12) 


Now  the  stress-components  (12)  must  satisfy  the  ordinary  equations  of  equilibrium 
which  are  three  of  the  type 


_      ^ ,     j 


(13) 


MR.  R  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.     197 
and  since  the  co-ordinates  of  the  point  which  ultimately  goes  to  (x  +  Sx,  y,  z)  were 


we 


have 


1  8  9a:  a  aa;  _8  &(, 

' 


It  follows  that  (13)  may  be  written  (to  our  approximation)  as  follows  :— 


20  \av,  av     av 


, 

i+e  a2 


Substituting  for  m',,  n\,  we  have  finally 

m-iav    av    av     m   /av     av 

(- 1 h  I  ^ — :r~  T  ^ — ^~ 

m  —  2  fa3      dw1       cz       m—2\cxcy     czcx 


+ 


/ay     av  \        xI+z7     /av    av\_0 
8^    *»w    4ci  +  ^±^^82! 


(15) 


X 

and  two  similar  equations.      In  any  ordinary  problem  we  may  neglect  e^...    in 

comparison  with  -j=f  ...  . 

The  equations  thus  obtained  may  also  be  written  (with  LAMP'S  notation  for  the 
elastic  constants)  as  follows  :  — 

=  0,..,&c.(    .     (16) 


2 

where 

.,      aw'      dv'  ,  du/ 

A  =  ^—  +  -—  +  -—  » 


T7.=-  4..+ 

=  fa*  +  w*dz>' 

a«/    a«'      „  ,     a«' 
==-~''     •        •~"' 


198     MR.  K.  V.  sulTIIUKl.L  <>N  THK  UKXKIJAL  THKOKY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

.mil  in  this  form  they  may  be  conveniently  compared  with  the  ordinary  equations  of 
elasticity.* 

The  three  equations  of  the  type  (15)  we  shall  term  Equations  of  Neutral  Equilibrium. 
The  equilibrium  of  the  stress-system  Xz,  Yy,  Z.  will  be  neutral,  provided  that  solutions 
for  u',  r',  w>'  exist  which  satisfy  certain  boundary  conditions.  These  boundary 
conditions  are  peculiar  to  each  problem,  but  usually  express  the  condition  that  the 
additional  stresses  involved  by  u',  v',  «•'  shall  vanish  on  certain  boundary  surfaces. 
T/iey  never  determine  the  magnitude  of  u',  tf,  w'  ,  so  that  our  solution  gives  the  farm 
only  of  the  distortion  which  tends  to  occur  in  the  body  under  consideration  when  its 
equilibrium  becomes  unstable.  It  gives  a  definite  relation  between  the  stress-system 
X,  ...  and  the  dimensions  of  the  body,  which  must  be  satisfied  in  order  that  any 
distortion  may  be  permanent  ;  but  if  this  relation  be  satisfied,  no  limits  are  imposed 
by  the  equations  upon  the  magnitude  of  the  distortion  which  may  occur,  t 

Example  in  Jiectangidar  Co-ordinates.     Stability  of  Thin  Plating  under 

Edge  Thrust. 

It  seems  advisable,  before  we  employ  a  new  method  on  problems  which  have  not  as 
yet  received  satisfactory  treatment,  in  some  degree  to  test  its  validity  by  the  result 
to  which  it  leads  in  a  more  familiar  example.  For  this  purpose  we  may  consider  the 
stability  of  an  infinite  strip  of  flat  plating  under  edge  thrusts  in  its  plane.  The 
accepted  formula}:  for  the  thrust  necessary  to  produce  instability,  per  unit  length  of 
edge,  is 


where 

2t  =  thickness  of  plate, 

/  =  breadth  of  plate, 

and  the  opposite  edges  are  simply  supported.     If  the  edges  are  built  in,  the  thrust 
required  has  four  times  this  value. 

To  investigate  this  problem  by  the  new  method  we  take  axes  Oa;  and  Oz  in  the 
middle  surface  of  the  pkte,  in  the  direction  of  its  breadth  and  length  respectively,  and 
Oy  perpendicular  to  the  middle  surface.  The  initial  stress-system  is  then  given  by 

X,  =  const.  =  G  (say),  ~ 


*  LOVK,  of.  at.,  §  91,  equation  (19). 

are>  hoWeVOr>  rig°rous  only  in  the  case  ^  infinitesM  displacements;  ef.  footnote, 


,     40 

.  LOVK,  op.  cti.,  §  337  (a),  whence  the  above  expression  may  be  obtained. 


MI;,  i;  v.  SOITTHWKI.I.  ON  THK  KKNKKAL  TIIKOUY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.  i«jy 


:ind  we  may  assume  that  the  system  i.f  strain  which  is  introduced  at  collapse  will  lie 
two-dimensional,  so  that 

^  =  ^=0,          -  =  const.  (19) 


z 


The  third  equation   <>f  utmtnil  stability  (for  the  direction  Oz)  is  then  satisfied 

G* 
identically,  and  the  other  two  equations  become  (if  we  neglect  terms  of  order  -^u'  ...J 


rn-2 


and 


m-2 


m-2 


m-2 


4C 

G_ 
4C 


k     .     .      (20) 


Let  us  assume  a  solution  of  the  form 


/  =  2[V.  cos  a 


"1 
J  ' 


(21) 


where  U.  and  V.  are  functions  of  y  only.     It  is  easy  to  show  that  this  assumption  as 
to  the  phase-relation  of  u'  and  v'  is  justified.     We  have  then 


and 


-.      .     .     (22) 


The  solution  of  these  equations  is  of  the  form 

U.  =  (P//  +  Q)  sinh  ay  +  (R//  +  S)  cosh  ay, 

G 


3»i-4      G\ 
m-2       4C  \  R 


__G     la 


-  >  cosh  a?/, 


.     .     (23) 


»-2      4C  / 

where  P,  Q,  R,  S  are  constants. 

The  boundary  conditions  now  demand  attention.  It  is  clear  that  the  stresses 
introduced  by  «',  t1',  w'  must  vanish  at  the  surfaces  of  the  plate.  Hence  these 
surfaces  will  still  be  planes  of  principal  stress,  and,  moreover,  the  normal  stress  upon 


200     Mi:    i:    V.  SOUTHWKl.L  ON  THE  IJKNKKAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 


(licin  must  vanish.  Hut,  as  we  have  already  seen,  the  line  which  becomes  a  direction 
< )//'  of  principal  stress  has  initially  the  direction-cosines 

— m,,     1,     n, : 

it  follows  that  at  the  surfaces  of  the  plate  the  expression  for  mt  and  na  must  vanish 
identically ;  moreover,  at  these  surfaces,  Y'y  must  vanish.  These  conditions  may  be 
written  in  the  form 


identically,  when  y  =  ±t.    .     .     (24) 


i       i\    v   ,    i     .    « 
(m-l)  —  +  —  +  —  =  0, 

cy      tiz      dx 


The  first  condition  is  already  satisfied.     The  other  two  give  (if  we  neglect  terms  of 


and 


or 


rf// 


-  when  y  =  +t, 


(25) 


2m- 


G 


;  E 

m+ 


m-2      40 


.GL\ 


/.  _ 


shaj/ 


and 


(m-2)  ay  sinh  ay-2  (m-  1  ) 


4G 


cosh  ay 


when 


___  G_ 
m-2      40 


(m-2)  ay  cosh  ay-2  (m-\) ^—  sinh  ay 

m         G 

m-2     40 

y  =  ±t    .    .  > 


+  Q(m— 2)  a  sinh  ay 


+  S  (m— 2)  a  cosh  ay  =  0 


(27) 


Mi;    R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.   201 
Thus  we  obtain 


aS=  P 


1- 


2m- 1  <i 


/  m     GVi  i  m-1  —} 

-\rn-2      4C/\       m+l     l<  ' 
•2  m-\  G 


-2)'2C  .,      . 
at  cotli  at 


)  =  It 


(  m        G  \  / ,     m-}     G  \ 
ZT>>      if  V  I  ,  i  '  T7i  / 


at  tanh  at 


aS  =  P 


WI- 


TH—2  \      wt 


40 


—  at  tanh  at 


Vm-2      4C' 


aQ  =  R 


»n  — 


4(,1 


wi        G 


-   I  —  at  coth  at 


^w— 2 


(28) 


There  are  two  solutions  of  the  equations  (28).     Either 
2m -1  G 


1- 


(m+l)(m-2)    2C  ,  aO      .,T«-I/  4(-       \  ,, 

at  tanh  at  =  -  p  =  2  -  — T    I  —at  coth  at, 

G\7,  .  m-1     (•  R         m-2\      wt          G    I 


and 
or 


1- 


ro+1   4(J/ 


2m -1  G 


-2      4C/ 


P  =  S  =  0, 


(29) 


-2     2C 


aS        m-\ 


Ijn _G 

and 


F  *\-S  A  Al  A  C*kJ  ^     III     I 

-PTT  —at  coth  at  =  -=^-  =  2  - 
-1     G\  P         wi-2 


,     _ 
4C 


.      m     .     ^ 
f  mTT  '  '" 


m          (• 


—at  tanh  at, 


(30) 


The  criterion  for  neutral  stability  is  in  the  first  case 

r-1        G- 


1  + 


,/     .1  k    A 

at  (coth  at  -tanh  at)  = 


and  in  the  second  case 


1  + 


1  + 


4.       v 
at  (tanh  at-coth  at)  = 


1  + 


2»i(m+l)    C 

2m"- 1       G_ 
2>n(wi.+  l)'  C 

1  < 

2wi(m  +  l)    C 


Vi  >L.  CCX1IJ. A. 


2  D 


•_•,.•_•     MK.  IL  V.  SOrTIIWKLI.  OX  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 
so  Unit   tlu-  \aln.  -  <>f  <;.  for  which  collapse  by  instability  may  be  expected  to  occur, 

G  l-2oc<  cosech 


~  2m  (m+l  )  V  ~  2m"-  \-2ett  cosech  2at 

and 

G  _         1  +  2ai  cosech  2ett 


~  2m(m  +  l)C  ~  2m3  '-  1  +  2at  cosech  2at  ' 
respectively,  the  total  thrust,  per  unit  length  of  edge,  being 

JJ  =  -2*G  ...........     (33) 

The  first  approximations  to  a  solution,  in  terms  of  t,  are 

G=_$.-™£-.aV'  .     (34) 

m  —  1 

and 

=-E  .........    (35) 


m 


respectively.  Since  the  complete  wave-length  of  the  corrugations  into  which  the 
plate  distorts  is 

A  =  ^, (36) 

we  see  that  (34)  is  equivalent  to  (17),  and  that  the  latter  formula  is  therefore 
supported  by  our  investigation  as  a  first  approximation.  The  second  solution  (35)  is 
without  practical  interest,  owing  to  the  magnitude  of  the  thrust  required  to  produce 
collapse.  It  refers  to  a  type  of  distortion,  theoretically  possible  for  _an  ideal  material 
without  limits  of  elasticity,  which  is  approximately  realized  in  actual  specimens  of 
ductile  material,  when  tested  to  failure  under  compressive  stress.  Since  Q  =  R  =  0, 
we  see  from  (23)  that  in  this  type  the  middle  surface  remains  plane.  In  the  first 
tyjxj  of  failure,  where  P  =  S  =  0,  we  find  that  U.  =  0  when  y  =  0,  so  that  the  middle 
surface  undergoes  no  change  of  extension  in  the  distortion  given  by  «',  v',  w'.* 

EQUATIONS  OF  NEUTRAL  EQUILIBRIUM  IN  CYLINDRICAL  CO-ORDINATES. 

Derivation,  of  the  Equations. 

The  equations  (15)  of  neutral  equilibrium  are  expressed  in  a  form  which  is 
unsuitable  for  the  investigation  of  problems  concerned  with  the  stability  of  thin 
tubes,  and  we  have  next  to  obtain  the  corresponding  equations  in  cylindrical 

*  Besides  the  harmonic  solutions  to  (20)  we  may  have 

«*'  =  gx,        v  =  hy,        ?/•'  =  fc; 
but  g,  h,  and  k  vanish  in  virtue  of  the  boundary  conditions. 


MR.  R.  V.  BOOTHWBL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.   203 

co-ordinates.  We  Hlmll  limit  our  discussion  to  stress-systems  which  produce  a 
displacement  symmetrical  about  an  axis,  up  to  the  instant  at  which  the  equilibrium 
becomes  unstable  and  distortion  occurs  :  in  PKARSON'S  notation,  the  principal  stresses 

in  the  equilibrium  configuration  an-  /•/•,  rt#,  and  zz,  and  these  quantities  are  functions 
of  r  only. 

The  new  equations  are  derived  by  a  method  very  similar  to  that  which  has  already 
been  explained.     The  co-ordinates  of  a  point  in  the  unstrained  configuration  are 

r,     e,     z; 

in  the  second  configuration  (of  equilibrium)  they  are 

r+it,     6,     z+ir, 

and  in  the  third  configuration  (of  slight  distortion  from  the  position  of  equilibrium) 
they  are 

r+  »'  +  "',          0 


(the  radial,  tangential,  and  axial  displacements  u't  r',  iS  being  ultimately  taken  as 
infinitesimal). 

The  extension  of  a  line-element  joining  the  point  (r,  B,  z)  to  the  point  (r+ir,  0  +  30, 
z  +  $z)  is 


*>  /I      I      I     •"     ** 

/•      r       >T0  /         ?z 

GIP 
T  I  T 1" ^T  Till  I  + 

L  cr       r    <  rt         \ 
where 

m  =  r  — ,         and          n  —  -^  ; 


cwAl'l  "I 

TF/J    !' 


and  this  has  a  stationary  value  for  a  line  very  slightly  inclined  to  the  radius,  given 
by 


where  <•„  c,,  c3  are  written  for  dli/2r,  w/c,  ami  <  </•/<  :  ivnpectivt'ly. 

2  D  2 


MI:  i:  v  SIHTHNVKM.  ox  TIII:  CKNKK.VL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

The  extension  of  this  line-element  in  the  third  configuration  is 


(39) 


and  its  inclination  to  lines  issuing  from  the  point  (in  its  final  position)  in  the  null..!. 
tangential,  and  axial  directions  is  given  by  the  direction  cosines 


where 


mill 


1,     m\,     »'„ 


l+c, 


(40) 


- 


We  find  also  that  the  other  directions  of  principal  stress  in  the  final  configuration 
are  initially  inclined  to  radial,  tangential,  and  axial  lines  through  (r,  6,  z)  at  angles 
whose  direction  cosines  are 


and 


-m,,     1,     na, 

W],  Wa,         Ij 


and  that  in  the  third  configuration  they  have  corresponding  inclinations  to  radial, 
tangential,  and  axial  lines  through  (r,  6,  z) — in  its  final  position — which  are  given  by 


and 
where 

and 


_r/          — «'         1 
'<•  i  >  "•  a>       *  > 


«,  = 


?l  ,  = 


r  d( 


(41) 


The  extensions  of  the  corresponding  line-elements  in  the  final  configuration  are 
respectively 


r       r 


(42) 


Mi;,   i:    V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  Till.  CKNKiai.  THKORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.     205 


so  that  the  principal  stress.-s  in  tin-  third  configuration,  referred  to  the  fined  areas  of 
the  faces  on  which  they  act,  are 

t  " 


I       H!  +  1 ^     ay  i 
*•    r  a0      a? 

!+<•,       ~1+«J 


20 


I  dtl/          cV     1 

« !__^__^L 

(l+f3)(l +f,)  I          1 +e,      l+e,J 


2C 
m-2 


r 


[a«'        «;      IrV    I 
f>         r      r  ?0 
1--; n 
1  +  r,           !+«-,     J 


2C 


m-2     r,     .  v  a«^ 

+  71  -  rr;  -  d  (»i-l)^^ 
(l+e,)(l+r,)l  -  . 

Then  by  the  scheme  of  transformation 


«'    i  a 

—  +  -  ==- 
r     r  cflj 


•     (43) 


tf  z' 


1         -m',      -n', 


0 

m',          1         -n', 

i 

n\ 


n', 


we  find  for  the  stress  components  in  the  third  configuration,  at  the  point  which  was 
initially  at  (r,  6,  z),  —  referred  to  axes  in  the  radial,  tangential,  and  axial  directions 
through  the  final  position  of  the  point,  and  to  the  final  areas  of  the  faces  upon  which 
they  act  —  the  expressions 


. 

rr  =  rr',         00  =  00',         zz  =  z/, 


=  07-  = 


required  approximation),  <fec. 


(to  the 
(44) 


206      MR.  R  V.  SOUTHWELL  OX  THE  OKNKHAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 
The  equations  of  equilibrium,  to  be  satisfied  by  the  stress  components  (44),  are* 

1  ZrO  .  far  .  ri'-ee 


<>      r  $6 


czr     1  cQz     czz     zr  _ 
?r      r  20       ?2       r  '      ' 


where 


and 

Moreover,  since 


9  =  0+-!—, 
r  +  u 


z  = 


ay   i  -f 

•e,    »/                          a?t?' 

1 

a     ar    i  -j 

•ea  ?•  i  a           a/-         a 

cu'    3r      (!+,,,)( 

l+ej     )•  cQ      (\  +e.)(\  +e  )    a2  ' 

1 

a»- 

_1 

av 

i  a»-' 

as       a 

i            it)         *•  ae 

(45) 


and 


St/ 


i  a 


the  equations  (45)  may  be  expressed  in  differentials  with  respect  to  >-,  0    z      The 
erms  which  do  not  involve  »',  t,',  „•'  vanish  in  virtue  of  the  equilibrium  conditions 
the  second  configuration,  and  only  terms  of  the  first  order  in  these  quantities 
need  Ije  retained. 

In  general,  ,„  ,„  <>:t  may  all  be  functions  of  ,-,  but  in  this  paper  we  shall  only 

onsider  problems  in  which  ,„  and  ?z  have  constant  values.     Moreover,  in  all  problems 

of  practical  importance  we  may  neglect  terms  of  order  j£«'...  in  comparison  with 

\^ 

*  LOVK,  «/>.  fit.,  §  59  (i). 


Mi; 


,  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  OX  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.     207 


terms  of  order  2  »'... .     We  then  obtain,  as  the  equations  of  neutral  equilibrium  in 
\j 

cylindrical  co-ordinates, 

irv    i3i«'   «r\    i  av   av    3/11-4  i  fv     »*  /i  av     av\ 
2^2^  +  7Tv"~ ?'  +  ^?^i"f "a?"  m-2  •75aT"'"m-2'rarad   azaw 

/5+^\I  A/1  F^-^-^U/SiS^ -(  —  -  —  )  =  0,    ....    (46) 

l\  icT/rwVrafl    a/-    r/       4C  /az\az 

?„'      PV      1  Sr'      r'  -1     1   3V  .  aV  .      m       I  3V 


V 
av 


-4 


4C 


^  +  ^-i^-'N)l  =  o>    .   .-.   (47) 
* 


and 


av 


av 


m-2 


/ 


1  ?  /I  a«'' 


4C 


L«l_^')l  =  0.  .  .     (48) 


Equations  (46-48)  represent  the  conditions  for  neutraUtability  in  the  equilibrium 
of  a  body  subjected  to  a  stress-system  »T,  W,  K,  where  n  is  constant,  and  ri-  and  60 
are  functions  of  r  only,  which  satisfy  the  condition  of  equilibrium 


, 

_ j-  - 

?»•  r 


(49) 


For  comparison  with  the  ordinary  equations  ot  equilibrium  in  cylindrical 
co-ordinates  they  may  be  written  (with  LAME'S  notation  for  the  elastic  constants)  in 
the  forms* 


and 


where 


.      (50) 


i  a  /   ,x ,  ia»-' 
=;a7.(nt)  +  7.aT  + 

*  Cf.  LOVK,  oj>.  r»<.,  §  199. 


80  tliilt 


208    MI:  K.  \   soi  rnui.i.i,  ON  TIIK  I;KXKIJAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

and 

?/•  '  r  I9r  90  J  ' 

r9rv"~r/  '  r  90    f  IT 

Examples  in  Cylindrical  Co-ordinates.     Stability  of  Boiler  Fines  and 

Tnbular  Struts. 

The  Equations  of  Neutral  Equilibrium  in  Cylindrical  Co-ordinates  enable  us  to  deal 
successfully  with  some  difficult  problems  connected  with  the  stability  of  cylindrical 
tubes.  Two  examples  of  considerable  importance  will  be  discussed  in  this  paper — the 
collapse  of  boiler  flues  and  the  strength  of  tubular  struts.  It  should  be  noticed  that 
neither  of  these  problems  has  been  quite  satisfactorily  treated  by  the  ordinary  theory 


ooo 


Fig.  2. 

of  thin  shells,  which  requires  the  assumptions  that  the  middle  surface  of  the  sbell  is 
unextended,  and  the  inner  and  outer  surfaces  free  from  applied  tractions* ;  hence  their 
solution  is  a  problem  of  considerable  interest,  even  apart  from  practical  considerations, 
and  has  attracted  a  great  deal  of  attention.  It  will  be  convenient  at  this  point  to 
review  the  work  which  has  already  been  done. 

The  question  of  the  stability  of  tubular  struts  is  important,  owing  to  the  frequency 
of  their  employment  in  practice.  In  economy  of  material  the  cylindrical  tube 
possesses  an  advantage  over  struts  of  solid  cross-section,  and  both  the  theory  of 

*  Cf.  A.  B.  BASSET,  'Phil.  Trans.  Roy.  Soc.,'  A,  CLXXXI.,  p.  437 ;  and  RAYLEIGH,  'London  Math. 
Soc.  Proc.,'  vol.  XX.,  p.  379. 


MR.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  OX  THE  <:i  NKKAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    209 

l-'.c  I. F.I;'  .-iii'l  LM.I:  \\«.i>  ;in<l  tin'  more  |>r;n-t  I'M!  f-rniul.i  ..('  I;\\MM.  VQg^e«l  thai 
this  advantage  increases  without  limit  as  the  thickness  of  the  tube  is  reduced.  Such 
a  conclusion  is,  however,  inaccurate,  for  types  of  distortion  are  possible  in  the  case  of 
a  tube  which  do  not  involve  flexure  of  the  axis,  and  when  the  tube  is  thin  these 
types,  of  which  some  practical  examples  are  shown  in  fig.  2,  may  be  maintained  by  a 
smaller  thrust  than  would  be  required  to  produce  failure  of  the  kind  discussed  by 
EULER.  Moreover,  the  natural  wave-length,  for  these  symmetrical  types  of  distortion, 
is  in  general  small,  so  that  distortion  can  occur  without  hindrance  in  quite  short 
tubes.  Hence,  for  a  considerable  range  of  length  the  strength  of  a  tube  to  resist 
end-thrust  is  practically  constant,  and  is  not  given  by  any  of  the  usual  formulae  for 
struts. 

The  determination  of  the  strength  of  tubes  to  resist  these  symmetrical  types  of 
distortion  is  obviously  a  problem  of  the  highest  practical  importance,  and  has 
attracted  a  great  deal  of  attention  in  recent  years.  Illustrations  of  collapsed  tubes, 
showing  symmetrical  types  of  distortion,  have  been  published  by  A.  MALLOCK|  and 
R.  LORENZ,§  and  a  great  deal  of  experimental  work  has  been  carried  out  by 
W.  E.  LILLY. ||  Theoretical  discussions,  by  approximate  methods,  have  been  proposed 
by  A.  GROS,1f  W.  E.  LILLY,**  S.  TiMOSCHENKott  and  R.  LORENZ.}} 

The  problem  of  the  boiler  flue  seems  first  to  have  been  suggested  by  the  experi- 
ments commenced  by  FAIRBAIRN  in  1858.§§  These  showed  that  the  collapse  of  tubes 
under  external  pressure  was  in  some  degree  analogous  to  that  of  straight  columns 
under  end-thrust,  and  a  discussion  of  the  phenomenon,  based  on  EULER'S  theory  of 
struts,  was  given  by  W.  C.  UNWIN,||||  who  assisted  FAIRBAIRN  in  his  research.  The 
similar  problem  of  a  circular  wire  ring  subjected  to  radial  pressure  has  been 
discussed  by  M.  BRESSE^H  and  M.  LEVY,***  and  rational  theories  of  the  boiler- 
flue  problem  have  been  given  by  G.  H.  BRYAN.ttt  A.  FoprL.jjJ  P.  FORCHHKIMER§§§ 

*  "  Sur  la  force  des  colonnes,"  '  Hist.  Acad.  Berlin,'  XIII.  (1757),  p.  252. 
t  "  Sur  la  figure  des  colonnes,"  '  Miscellanea  Taurinensia,'  V.  (1773). 
J  '  Koy.  Soc.  Proc.,'  A,  LXXXI.  (1908),  p.  389. 
§   '  Physikalische  Zeitschrift,'  XII.  (1911),  p.  241. 

||   '  Proc.  Inst.  Mech.  Eng.,'  1905  ;  'lust.  Civ.  Eng.  Ireland,'  1906  ;  '  Engineering,'  January  10,  1908. 
f  'Comptes  Rendus,'  CXXXIV.  (1902),  p.  1041. 
**  'Inst.  Civ.  Eng.  Ireland,'  1906. 

tt  'Zeitschrift  f.  Mathematik  u.  Physik,'  LVIII.  (1910),  p.  337. 

Jt  '  Zeitschrift  des  Vereines  Deutscher  Ingenieure,'  October  24,  1908  ;  'Physikalische  Zeitschrift,'  XII. 
(1911),  p.  241. 

f§    '  Phil.  Trans.  Roy.  Soc.,'  CXLVIIL,  p.  389. 
HII    '  Proc.  Inat.  C.E.,'  XLVI.  (1875),  p.  225. 
fH  'Cours  de  M&anique  Appliquee,'  1.  Partic,  Paris,  1859. 
***  '  LIOUVILLE'S  Journal,'  X.  (1884),  p.  5. 
ttt  'Proc.  Camb.  Phil.  Soc.,'  VI.  (1888),  p.  287. 
JJt  'Resistance  des  Materiuux  '  (1901),  p.  286. 
§§§  'Zeitschrift  des  Oesterreichischen  Ingenieur-  mid  Architekten-Vereines,'  1904. 

VOL.   COXIII. — A.  2   E 


210     MK.  K.  V.  siMTHNVKI.L  (>X  THK  CKXF.RAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

and  R.  LORENZ.*  W.  E.  LiLLYt  has  indicated  the  correct  form  of  the  result  for 
an  infinitely  long  flue,  and  A.  E.  H.  LOVE{  has  discussed  the  strengthening  effects  of 
constraints  which  keep  the  tube  circular  at  its  ends. 

A.  B.  BASSET§  has  given  a  very  clear  exposition  of  the  difficulties  which  are 
encountered  in  an  attempt  to  construct  a  theory  of  flue  collapse  by  usual  methods. 
To  obtain  sufficient  equations  we  must  assume  that  the  middle  surface  undergoes  no 
extension  ;  and  the  existence  of  pressure  on  one  or  both  surfaces  of  the  tube  not  only 
makes  this  assumption  very  improbable,  but  violates  an  essential  condition  upon 
which  the  theory  of  thin  shells  is  based.  When  one  surface  only  is  subjected  to 
pressure,  there  is  reason  to  believe  that  BKYAN'S  solution  is  substantially  correct ; 
but  no  treatment  can  be  looked  upon  as  rigorous  which  neglects  the  cross-stresses  in 
the  material. 

The  experimental  researches  of  A.  P.  CABMAN||  and  R  T.  STEWART^  have  revived 
interest  in  this  problem,  since  they  offer  the  first  information  which  has  been  obtained 
as  to  the  behaviour  under  practical  conditions  of  tubes  which  in  circularity,  uniformity 
of  thickness  and  homogeneity  are  fair  approximations  to  the  ideal  tube  of  theoretical 
analysis.** 

We  commence  our  discussion  by  considering  the  stability  of  a  thin  cylindrical  tube, 
subjected  to  the  combined  action  of  end  and  surface  pressures.  We  shall  thus  be 
able  to  derive  the  required  solutions  for  the  thin  tubular  strut,  and  for  a  boiler  flue 
without  end-thrust,  as  particular  cases,  and  from  the  general  solution  we  may  obtain 
indications  of  the  way  in  which  end-thrust  tends  to  promote  the  collapse  of  a 
boiler  flue. 

In  the  most  general  form  of  the  boiler-flue  problem,  as  enunciated  by  BASSET,tt 
pressures  are  acting  on  both  surfaces  of  the  tube,  and  we  shall  therefore  investigate 
conditions  for  neutral  stability  in  a  tube  subjected  to  the  following  system  of 
stresses : — 

(i.)  An  end-thrust  of  total  amount  ,&,  uniformly  distributed  ; 
(ii.)  An  external  hydrostatic  pressure,  of  intensity  $! ;  and 
(iii.)  An  internal  hydrostatic  pressure,  of  intensity  $2. 

*  '  Physikalische  Zeitschrift,'  XII.  (1911),  p.  241. 
t  'Inat.  Civ.  Eng.  Ireland,'  1910. 
|  '  Proc.  Lond.  Math.  Soc.,'  XXIV.  (1893),  p.  208. 
§  '  Phil.  Mag.,'  XXXIV.  (1892),  p.  221. 

"Resistance  of  Tubes  to  Collapse,"  'Bulletin  of  the  Univ.  of  Illinois,'  No.  17,  1906. 
"  Collapsing  Pressures  of  Bessemer  Steel  Lap- Welded  Tubes,"  '  Trans.  American  Soc.  Mech.  Eng.,' 
1906,  p.  730. 

1  The  experiment*  of  FAIRBAIRN  were  restricted  to  tubes  which  were  constructed  from  sheet  metal, 
with  brazed  and  riveted  seams, 
ft  Lot.  eit.,  p.  223. 


Mi;    It  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    211 


We  shall  consider  a  tube  of  indefinite  length,  of  which  the  inner  and  outer  radii  are 

a±t     (so  that  the  thickness  is  2t), 


and  we  shall  write 


for  the  ratio  -• 
a 


The  com-spoiid'nig  stress-system,  for  the  position  of  equilibrium,  is  easily  obtained.* 
We  have 


TV  = — 


DO  =  -v- 


and 


zz  =  — 


& 


.     .     .     (51) 


It  can  also  be  shown  that  e3  is  constant,  and  equations  (46-48)  may  therefore  be 
taken  to  express  the  conditions  of  neutral  equilibrium.  The  degree  of  approximation 
to  which  these  equations  have  been  obtained  (p.  20<i)  will  be  maintained  for  the  rest 

>-s 

•»•»•* 

of  this  paper,  i.e.,  terms  of  order  -^  «'...  will  be  neglected.    They  may  also  be  written 
as  follows  :  — 


m 


r 


2 


A\  1   3V      /3m-4      A\  1  dv' 

•         /  *N  r\    A  '  I  «1        »>    rt 


rn-2      2/r3r80     \rn-2       2  /  r9  SB 

V  = 


I    m        A)I 
W-2      2/  r 


-2       4  \"      r8/  '    4 

A\  1   3V    .  /3m— 4     A 
m-2       2 


Bl 


(52) 


m-1     1  3V 

7H-2V  39s 

m         A  A 


B  1  1  3V 


- 


and 
f    m 


m-2      4  \ 


4j  82  8r     lm-2      4 


3z 


m        A/       .aa\      B\l   8V 
hlm-2      4V      r»r    4 


_ 
4\       1* 


B118V      m-1    3V 


_ 

- 


*  LOVE,  '  Mathematical  Theory  of  Elasticity  '  (2nd  edition),  §  100. 

2  E  2 


_•!•_'     Ml;    K.  V.  SOITTHWKLL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

where 

A=  - 


4C 


B  = 


and 


<T  =  —; 


(55) 


We  may  assume  a  solution  for  equations  (52-54)  of  the  form* 
u'  =  2  T  U*.  ,  sin  k  (6  +  6,)  sin  2  (z  +  Zg)  J 


=  2    W4.  sin  i- 


cos 


2  (2  +  Zq)  ] 


where  Jt  must  be  integral,  and  UM,  VM,  Wti,  are  functions  of  r  only,  which  satisfy 
the  differential  equations 

A 


•  f/   w        A\l  d      /3m-  4      A\  l"lv 
A"L\m-2      2/rdr     Vm-2  "  2/f*J    fc 

2.\^  —  Afi+^r\+iid  w    0 

aLm-2       4  \        r*/       4_Ur 


(57) 


and 


(68) 


aLlm-2      4\        i»  )      4  J  dr      \rn-2      4 

r  A  /         2\     TJ  ~n  i 

aLm-2~T\  "^)  +  T\r     k-q 

L  A 
4  * 


r 


m-2 


r2  /      4  J  \r  dr     rV 

^<  .  =  0. 


(59) 


It  is  easy  to  show  that  the  phase-relations  assumed  in  equations  (56)  are  necessary. 


Mi;.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  Till!  (IF.NKKA!,  THKOKY  OK  HI. ANTIC  STAHILITY.    213 


The  boundary  conditions  now  require  investigation.  From  the  consideration  that 
the  cylindrical  Ixmndary  surfaces  of  tin-  tulx-  must  continue  to  be  tangent  to  principal 
planes  of  stress,  in  any  possible  type  of  distortion,  we  deduce  the  conditions 


m,  =  0 
n,  =0. 


•,  identically,  when  r  =  a±t. 


(60) 


The  other  boundary  conditions  are  more  complex.  Since  the  pressures  acting  on 
the  surfaces  of  the  tube  are  hydrostatic,  it  is  clear  that  the  radial  stress,  as  defined 
on  p.  193,  is  increased  at  points  on  the  boundary  surfaces  of  the.  tube  where  the 
distortion  involves  positive  extension.  In  the  notation  employed  above,  we  have 

rr1  =  — |Ji,     when     r  =  a+t, 
=  —$;i»     when     r  =  a—t, 
and  from  (43)  we  deduce  the  following  equations,  which  must  be  satisfied  identically,* 


m— : 


u 


v  _,_  i  at/  _,_  a 
+       +       '  wheu 


_,      ,        , 

C  [r      r26 


r  =  a—t, 


..     .     .     (61) 


Substituting  from  (56)  in  the  identities  (60)  and  (61),  we  finally  obtain,  as  the 
required  boundary  conditions  in  U*.,,  VM,  and  WAi?, 


and 


.     (62) 


when  r  =  a±t. 

*  In  obtaining  these  equations  it  should  be  noticed  that  before  distortion  occurs  -  5,  and  - 1)3  are  the 
values  at  the  boundary  of 


^~s  /"^ 

Bid  not  of  rr,  if  we  retain  the  significance  for  rr  which  was  assumed  on  p.  193.     The  distinction  is  not 
really  needed  for  the  approximation  of  the  following  work,  but  it  may  lead  to  confusion  if  neglected. 


L'l  I     \1K    I:    V.  SOUTH  WKLL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 


The  differential  relations  (57-59),  with  the  boundary  conditions  (62),  are 
theoretically  sufficient  for  an  exact  solution  of  our  problem  :  we  shall,  however, 
content  ourselves  with  approximate  solutions  for  ($,—  $2)  and  <§,  correct  to  terms 
in  r3.  To  obtain  these,  we  assume  solutions  for  UAt  g,  VAi  r  Wkit,  in  series  of  ascending 
powers  of  the  quantity  (r—a).  Thus  we  write 


(63) 


\a/     2!W        "J 
where  r  =  a+h. 

We  may  now  derive,  from  equations  (57-59),  any  required  number  of  relations 
between  the  undetermined  coefficients  £,...»;<,...£,...,  and  the  boundary  conditions  (62) 
take  the  form  of  equations  in  series  of  ascending  powers  of  the  small  quantity  T,  in 
which  the  sums  of  the  odd  and  of  the  even  powers  must  vanish  separately.  If  we 
neglect  in  these  equations  terms  of  order  higher  than  some  definite  power  of  T,  we 
may  obtain  corresponding  approximations  to  the  values  of  A  and  B,  by  the  elimination 
of  the  undetermined  coefficients. 

The  approximate  boundary  conditions,  correct  to  terms  in  r3,  are* 


(64) 


(65) 


-i:t.fly     (67) 


in\  _ 


2fi-?-|-&  =  0,.     .     .     .     (68) 

In  deriving  these  boundary  conditions  it  is  to  be  noticed  that  a-  is  to  a  first  approximation  equa 
to  -  1,  80  that  to  our  approximation  -  T*  may  be  written  for  <n-2. 


MR.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OP  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    215 


and 


^-gf3  =  0,    .     .     (69) 

and  these  equations  involve  the  fifteen  coefficients 

£o •••£!>    in •  ••i?i>    M"-MO 

From    equations    (57-59)    we   may   obtain    nine   other    relations    between    these 
coefficients,  as  follows  : — 


m- 


+  -Z-)+T<r  — 


— 1 m— 


-8      A 


-4      A 


A-B 


i-2         4 


—  a-  • 


•     (72) 


216    MI;  i;  v.  sorrrnvKi.!.  ox  TIIH  CKXKKAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 


_  A)],, 

4  /  J 


2         m—  2 

0,    .   (74) 


(75) 


A-B        A  1  .  m        A-B         A 


2 
A-B        A 


(70) 


Mil.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    217 
m       A—  B  .     A~|     .  i        m       A—  B 


-  f  kqrr  A.;,,  -f  ^kqtr^  -  $kf/  -  +  <T  — 

[_m—  2          4  4  J 


+  <T  —        , 


(78) 


We  may  now  eliminate  the  coefficients  from  equations  (64-78),  and  obtain  a 
detciinin.uital  equation,  of  fifteen  rows,  which  gives  a  relation  between  A,  B  and  the 
dimensions  of  the  tube.  This  relation  is  the  condition  for  neutral  equilibrium  of  the 
initial  stress-system,  and  is  clearly  correct  to  terms  in  T*  ;  but  by  further  consideration 
of  the  terms  involved  we  may  show  that  the  labour  which  would  be  required  for  its 
complete  evaluation  is.  unnecessary,  and  as  the  fifteen-row  determinant  may  be 
written  down  directly  from  the  above  equations  it  will  not  be  given  here. 

Solution  for  Boiler  Flue  tvithout  End  Thrust. 

We  shall  begin  by  deriving  a  sufficiently  approximate  expression  for  the  difference 
of  pressure  required  to  produce  collapse  of  a  tube,  when  there  is  no  resultant  end 
thrust  or  tension  ;  and  in  the  first  case  we  shall  deal  with  a  form  of  collapse  possible 
only  in  the  case  of  tubes  of  infinite  length.  That  is  to  say,  we  make  B  and  q  equal 
to  zero  in  the  fifteen-row  determinant,  which  may  then  be  reduced  to  one  of  ten 
rows. 

In  the  latter  determinant  we  may  treat  A  as  a  quantity  of  order  T*  ;  for  if  A  be 
put  equal  to  zero,  and  the  determinant  be  expanded,  the  terms  which  are  independent 
of  T  vanish  identically.  Hence  —A  may  be  written  for  o-A,  and  AT*  may  be 
neglected. 

The  ten-row  determinant,  simplified  by  these  and  other  obvious  modifications,  is 
given  on  pp.  218  and  219.  Expanding  it  from  the  top  row,  with  the  neglect  of  terms 
of  order  higher  than  r2,  we  obtain 


m— 2  \m— ' 
whence 


VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  2    F 


218    MR.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

0,  -  £  0, 


0, 

o, 


-1, 

(m-2)A, 

m-1 
m—  2 


n 
—  2 


m-2 

m-2' 

m-1 
m-2' 

m-1 


1, 

o, 

1, 
0, 


m, 


m—  2 


m- 


m- 


m 


A 
—  » 

m—  2      2 

37>t-4  ,  A 
m-2  "2* 


3m-4      A 

m-2  "2 


0, 

i, 

0, 
1, 


(m-2)  A«r, 


3tn-4      A 


m—  2 


m-2 


\        2 
0, 
m        A 


m-2       2 
3m- 4      A 

0, 
0, 
0, 
0, 

0, 


m— 1 
m-2' 


n 
U, 


A 


-1, 

o, 

0, 
0, 


0, 


0, 

-, 

0 


1 


m-2' 


U, 


3m-  4      AN 

m-2  "  2  '' 


m— : 


-1, 
o, 


Mi;.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.     219 

A  T'  T1 


AT, 


P(m-2)A, 


-4     A 

m-2  "    2 

u  /3m- 


3m-4  ,   A\ 

^2- +  T/1' 


3p/3mJ,4A\ 
\m— 2       2/ 


A 

"F 

-1, 

.l+(m-2)A, 

2  +  A, 
-(2  +  A), 

2  +  A, 


-( 


"i 


m-2 
m— 1 


-2 


1+y+2»-2 


<,j, 


-( 


i+v+2-  I*1'- 

2         m— 2 


m— 1 
'm-2' 

0, 
0, 


-tf 


A<r, 
0, 
0, 

0, 

m-2 
2 

m         AN 


0, 
i- ACT, 

0, 
0, 

o, 


2 
1+A, 


o, 


o, 


_^/_^_A), 
\m-2      27 


5m-4      A 


"i 


-*  1  +  = 


2         m-2 


0, 
0, 

o, 
o, 


A(l+<r)|,          0, 

o, 


0, 


o, 
o, 

m 
0, 


'+* 


i-±\ 


o, 
o, 
i-*A(r 

AO-, 
0, 


+«-;  . 


-2       *' 


0, 


_A(, 


m-2      4 
0, 


o, 


'• 


0, 


0, 
0, 


o, 


0, 
0, 
0, 


0, 
0, 
0, 
0, 


2  F  2 


Mi;    i;.  V.  SOITIIU  KI.L  ON  TIIK  CKNKKAT,  THEORY  OF  Hl.ASTIC  STABILITY. 
But  to  a  first  approximation 


so  that  we  have 


(80) 


which  agrees  with  BRYAN'S  result.* 

To  complete  our  discussion  of  this  problem  we  must  consider  types  of  distortion  in 
which  the  axial  wave-length  is  finite,  and  thus  obtain  a  theoretical  estimate  of  the 
strength  of  short  flues  with  fixed  ends.  A  solution  giving  A  correctly  to  terms  in  ra 
may  be  derived  from  the  complete  fifteen-row  determinant  ;  but  we  may  show  that 
for  practical  purposes  the  labour  which  this  evaluation  would  entail  is  quite 
unnecessary. 

We  find  first  of  all  that  those  terms  in  the  expression  for  A  which  are  independent 
of  T  contain  q*  as  a  factor.  Now  2AC  being  approximately  equal  to  the  mean  hoop 
stress  in  the  tube  before  collapse,  it  is  clear  that  A  must  in  all  cases  of  practical 
importance  be  a  very  small  quantity.  It  follows  that  in  the  expanded  equation  the 
terms  in  A  are  of  primary  importance,  and  A2  and  higher  powers  may  be  neglected  ; 
further,  since  q  must  also  be  small,  that  terms  in  <f  and  higher  powers  of  q  may 
be  neglected  in  comparison  with  terms  in  g4,  and  that  of  the  terms  in  r2  those  which 
involve  q  are  negligible  in  comparison  with  the  terms  already  found. 

In  accordance  with  these  principles  we  may  derive  the  terms  which  are  required  to 
complete  our  solution  from  a  nine-row  determinant,  obtained  by  omitting  terms  in  r2 
from  the  general  determinant.  This  simplified  determinant  is  given  on  pp.  218 
and  219.  Further,  we  may  neglect  A2  in  the  expansion,  and  in  the  coefficient  of  A 
retain  only  those  terms  which  do  not  involve  q  ;  we  thus  obtain  the  equation 


But,  by  equations  (55), 


and  therefore,  to  the  approximation  of  equation  (81), 


*  Cf.  footnote,  p.  209. 


Mi:,  i:    V    ^HTTIIWKLL  OX  THK  (IKNKKAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.     221 


Combining  this  result  witli  (80)  \v<>  have,  us  ,,ur  final  fxpn'ssion  for  the  pressure- 
'lill'crence  which  can  produce  collapse  of  the  flue, 


(83) 


In  this  equation  t/a  is  the  ratio  of  the  thickness  to  the  diameter  of  the  tube,  and  k 
is  the  number  of  lobes  in  tin;  distorted  form  of  its  cross-section.  The  quantity  q  is 
connected  with  the  axial  wave-length  X  of  the  distortion  by  the  relation 


q\  =  2ira. 


(84) 


We  may  imagine  a  flue  subjected  at  its  ends  to  constraints  which  merely  keep  the 
ends  circular,  without  imposing  any  other  restrictions  upon  the  type  of  distortion.* 
In  this  case  the  end  conditions  may  be  written  in  the  form 


when      z  = 


(85) 


and  from  (56)  it  is  clear  that  I,  the  length  of  the  flue,  is  equal  to 


c. 

|M| 

1 

* 

•*8 

\B 

2 

TIIBOKETICAL  COLLAPBIKG  PBRHBI-BIS 

&\ 

l^ 

—  L 

Vn 

I 

T    " 

K       :t  x  KV"  pound*  )>er  >q.  inch, 

i 

=  2  -07  x  10'-  d.vnes  per  «q.  cm 

1 

\ 

.S*^ 

\ 

\ 

Tliickncu  :  diameter  =  0  "01. 

•j  2 

H 

i  \ 

POISSOK'B  n 

it  in.  0  '3. 

Pressure  it 
K)  Zf. 

^^*^— 

\ 

£>~ 

^^^>>ii> 

} 

I'nJues   if    Z    £.             4                     6                     8                     K>                    II 

Fig.  3. 

[*  Added  June  .?. — Thin  circular  discs,  inserted  into  the  tube  at  its  ends,  but  not  fixed  to  it,  would 
approximately  realize  these  conditions.] 


Mil.  K.  V.  ROITTH\VI-LL  ON  THE  OKNT.K'AL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

In  practice,  the  end  constraints  will  also  tend  to  maintain  the  cylindrical  form  at 
the  ends  of  the  flue,  and  this  effect  will  strengthen  the  tube,  by  an  amount  which  is 
not  easy  to  determine  exactly.  In  any  case  we  may  say  that 

UJ. 

a      q 

and  we  may  illustrate  the  way  in  which  the  end  effects  die  out  by  plotting  the 
pressure  differences  ($.-&,)  against  the  quantity  q~\  To  do  this  we  must  take 
some  definite  value  of  the  ratio  tfa,  and  plot  different  curves  for  the  values  2,3,  .... 
Ac.,  of  k.  The  result  is  shown  by  fig.  3,  in  which  the  following  values  have  been 
assumed  for  the  constants  :  — 

E  =  3  x  107  pounds  per  sq.  inch, 
=  2-07  x  10"  dynes  per  sq.  cm. 


m  =  J^,         - 


From  an  inspection  of  the  different  curves  we  see  that  long  tubes  will  always  tend 
to  collapse  into  the  two-lobed  form,  since  the  curve  for  k  =  2  then  gives  the  least  value 
for  the  collapsing  pressure,  but  that  at  a  length  corresponding  to  the  point  A  the 
three-lobed  distortion  becomes  natural  to  the  tube,  and  for  shorter  lengths  still,  of 
which  the  point  B  gives  the  upper  limit,  the  four-lobed  form  requires  least  pressure 
for  its  maintenance.  Thus  the  true  curve  connecting  pressure  and  length  is  the 
discontinuous  curve  CBAE,  shown  in  the  diagram  by  a  thickened  line. 

Whatever  lie  the  relation  between  q  and  the  length  of  the  flue,  it  is  clear  that 
instability  is  theoretically  possible  in  cases  where  the  distortion  involved  is  not  even 
approximately  "  inextensional."  For  if  T  is  sufficiently  small,  the  collapsing  pressure, 
as  given  by  (83),  need  not  involve  elastic  break-down  in  the  position  of  equilibrium, 
even  though  the  first  (or  "  extensional  ")  term  in  (83)  be  equal  to,  or  even  greater 
than,  the  second.  Of  course,  elastic  break-down  will  occur  by  reason  of  the  extension 
very  soon  after  the  commencement  of  the  distortion.  Nevertheless,  failure  in  such  a 
case  must  be  regarded  as  due  entirely  to  instability  ;  for  if  this  source  of  weakness 
were  removed,  effective  resistance  could  be  offered  for  an  indefinite  period  to  pressures 
which  actually  result  in  collapse. 

Comparison  with  Experimental  Results. 

Although,  as  we  have  just  remarked,  it  is  theoretically  possible  for  failure  to  occur 
by  true  elastic  instability  in  comparatively  short  tubes,  yet  the  relative  dimensions  of 
the  tubes  must  be  such  as  it  would  be  quite  impossible  to  test  experimentally.  In 
any  practical  case,  instability  will  not  occur  until  the  properties  of  the  material  have 
been  altered  by  overstrain,  and  the  value  of  the  pressure  at  collapse  is  therefore  very 
much  less  than  the  foregoing  theory  would  suggest. 


MR.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENKKAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    2S8 

It  is,  however,  of  interest  to  compare  the  general  shape  of  the  theoretical  curve 
CBAE  (fig.  3)  with  the  results  of  experiment,  and  fig.  4  has  been  constructed  for  this 
purpose.  It  represents  a  number  of  tests  conducted  by  the  author  upon  seamless 
steel  tul>e  (0'028  inches  thick  and  1  inch  in  external  di;mn'ter),  and  shows  the  relative 
amounts  of  resistance  to  external  pressure  offered  by  different  lengths  of  tube.  In 
these  experiments  (selected  for  fig.  4  from  a  more  comprehensive  series  which  is  still 


Collapsing  Pressure  in.  Poiuuls  per  Square  fiifh,. 

1000  ZOOO  3000  4000 

* 

^ 

•Oo 
o 

COLLAPSING  PB18S0BI8  OF  SKAMLKI 
STKKL  TUBIB. 

(Tested  by  hydraulic  pressure.) 
lobes  in  diitorted  crow-section. 

il            

0 

4-f   Two 

t 

OO   Three  „                 „                „ 
•*•$•  Four;   „                 „                „ 

1 

+ 
* 

*        + 

•f 

h 

•f 

Unsupported.  5  Length  of     10   Tube    in,     15  fnrheg.        20 

Fig.  4. 


in  progreas)  the  ends  of  the  tube  were  gripped  by  means  of  slightly  conical  plugs  and 
sockets,  the  interior  being  kept  in  free  connection  with  the  atmosphere,  and  no 
attempt  was  made  to  balance  the  axial  thrust  due  to  hydrostatic  pressure  on  the 
plugged  end  of  the  tube.  Other  experiments  have  shown  that  the  existence  of  this 
thrust  is  not  seriously  important. 

It  will  be  seen  that  the  general  shape  of  the  theoretical  curve  is  well  reproduced, 
as  well  as  the  changes  in  the  number  of  lobes  which  characterize  the  distorted  cross- 
section.  Similar  results  to  those  of  fig.  4  have  been  obtained  by  CARMAN,*  but  his 
experiments  were  not  sufficiently  numerous  for  a  satisfactory  comparison  with  the 
theoretical  curve  of  fig.  3,  his  object  in  conducting  them  being  merely  to  discover 
what  is  the  limit  of  length  beyond  which  the  strength  of  a  tube  may  be  taken  as 


Of.  footnote,  p.  210. 


MI!.  R.  V.  sorrmVELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  TIIKOKY  OF  KLASTIC  STABILITY. 

sensibly  the  same  for  all  lengths.  The  main  interest  both  of  CABMAN  and  of 
-  i  \\  \KT*  was  confined  to  tubes  in  excess  of  this  limit,  experiments  on  which  may 
fairly  lx-  compared  with  the  theoretical  formula  (80);  their  results  showed  that  this 
formula  gives  a  satisfactory  estimate  of  the  strength  of  very  thin  brass  and  steel 
tulx-s.  but  must  not  be  taken  as  a  basis  for  design  throughout  the  whole  range  of 
dimensions  employed  in  practice. 

The  experiments  of  FAIRBAIRN,!  on  the  other  hand,  were  restricted  to  tubes  of 
such  relatively  small  length  that  he  failed  to  realize  the  existence  of  a  definite 
minimum  below  which  the  strength  of  a  tube,  however  long,  will  not  fall.  He  also 
neglected  the  possibility  of  discontinuities  in  the  curve  of  collapsing  pressure  at  points 
where  there  is  a  change  in  the  form  of  the  distorted  cross-section.  In  the  light  of 
these  facts,  figs.  3  and  4  help  to  explain  his  well-known  formula,  by  which  the 
collapsing  pressure  is  given  as  inversely  proportional  to  the  length  of  the  flue  ;  for  a 
curve  of  hyperbolic  form  will  represent  as  well  as  any  other  single  curve  the  scattered 
points  of  fig.  4,  and  trial  shows  that  the  hyperbola 


(86) 


is  very  closely  an  envelope  of  the  discontinuous  curve  CBAE  in  fig.  3,  in  each  case 
doivn  to  the  point  of  least  collapsing  pressure. 

Validity  of  Investigation  l»y  the  Theory  of  Thin  Shells. 

One  important  result  of  our  investigation,  which  is  apparently  new,  is  shown  by 
equation  (83).  It  may  be  seen  that  collapse  is  practically  dependent  upon  the  pressure- 
difference  alone,  and  that  the  absolute  values  of  the  pressures  are  immaterial.  In 
view  of  this  result,  the  objections  raised  by  BASSET  against  BRYAN'S  treatment  of  the 
problem  {  require  further  consideration. 

These  objections  are  :  first,  that  the  ordinary  expressions  for  the  stress-couples  in  a 
plate  or  shell,  in  terms  of  the  curvature  of  its  middle  surface,  are  not  valid  when  the 
surfaces  are  subject  to  pressure  ;  and  secondly,  that  it  is  not  legitimate  to  assume,  as 
we  must  if  sufficient  equations  are  to  be  obtained,  that  the  middle  surface  is 
unextended  in  a  configuration  of  slight  distortion.  Hence  the  theory  of  thin  shells 
is  not  applicable  to  this  problem. 

The  above  difficulties  may  be  almost  entirely  overcome  by  a  change  in  the  method 
of  investigation  which  is  employed.  It  is  customary  to  derive  equations  for  the 
equilibrium  of  the  distorted  shell  directly,  and  without  reference  to  the  position  of 
equilibrium.  Such  procedure  renders  it  necessary  to  make  BRYAN'S  assumptions,  that 
the  middle  surface  is  unextended,  and  that  the  usual  expressions  for  the  stress-couples 

*  Of.  footnote,  p.  210. 
t  Cf.  footnote,  p.  209. 
t  See  footnote,  p.  210. 


MR.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  TIIK  cl-.NI-.l:  \l.  TIIKORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    225 

are  valid.  But  we  may  also  proceed,  aa  in  the  foregoing  discussion,  by  first  deter- 
mining the  stress-system  for  the  equilibrium  position,  and  then  deriving  equations 
for  an  infinitesimal  displacement.  The  stress-couples  which  appear  in  these  equations 
will  be  dm*  to  the  ndilitionnl  ••</  rcsses  introduced  />//  tin-  distort  inn,  u,,d  since  these,  to 
a  first  approximation  >it  /<•".<  ,-nnixli  nt  the  surfaces  of  t/n  tnl,,-.  ///«//  //•///  lie.  given 
with  sufficient  accuraci/  lit/  tlie  usual  expressions.  Moreover,  when  the  distortion  is 
two-dimensional  (as  in  BASSET'S  problem),  the  change  in  the  "  hoop  "  stress-resultant 
\\  ill  be  of  an  order  which  is  negligible,  so  that  the  middle  surface  may  be  regarded  as 
undergoing  no  extension  relatively  to  the  equilibrium  position,  even  though  its  area 
may  be  sensibly  changed  in  comparison  with  the  unstrained  configuration.* 

The  method  of  investigation  just  described,  which  follows  the  actual  sequence  of 
occurrences  in  the  material,  is  suggested  as  in  every  way  preferable  to  existing 
methods,  for  the  investigation  of  any  problem  in  elastic  stability.  For  the  present 
'•\iimple,  in  particular,  it  leads  to  the  same  results  as  the  more  rigorous  methods  of 
this  paper. 

Comparison  uith  Existing  Formula. 

Previous  discussion  of  the  boiler-flue  problem  by  analytical  methods  have,  without 
exception,  dealt  with  a  tube  subjected  to  pressure  on  one  surface  only,  and  almost  all 
of  them  have  been  restricted  to  the  case  of  an  indefinitely  long  flue.  Their  results 
have,  therefore,  to  be  compared  with  our  equation  (80),  when  $.,  is  zero.  It  will  be 
found  that  this  equation  agrees  with  the  formula  obtained  by  BRYAN!  and  BASHKT::}: 

FOPPL'S  formulat  omits  the  factor  — ; ,  which  measures  the  increased  resistance  to 

m  —  1 

flexure  of  a  long  tube  as  compared  with  a  circular  ring. 

The  more  general  formula  may  be  compared  with  that  of  LORKNZ,*  if  $.,  IKJ  put 
equal  to  zero.  It  will  be  found  that  there  is  a  serious  want  of  agreement  in  regard 
to  both  terms  in  the  expression  (83).  In  support  of  the  latter  result,  it  may  be 
urged  that  LORKNZ'  solution  gives  for  the  indefinitely  long  flue  a  result  which  does 
not  agree  with  equation  (80)  (and,  as  we  have  just  noticed,  this  is  supported  by 
previous  investigations),  and  which  vanishes,  not  when  k  =  1,  but  when  k  =  0.  Now 
the  value  1,  in  the  case  of  an  infinitely  long  flue,  corresponds  to  translation  of  the 
tube  as  a  whole,  without  distortion,  and  the  value  0  to  a  change  in  the  diameter 
of  the  tube,  without  any  departure  from  circularity.  It  is  clear  that  the  applied 
pressures  can  have  no  tendency  to  maintain  such  a  form  of  distortion,  so  that  LOUDTZ' 
formula  can  hardly  be  correct. 

[*  ;t<ttle<l  June  8. — The  arguments  of  this  section  are  more  fully  developed  in  n  paper  by  the  author 
"  On  the  Collapse  of  Tubes  by  External  Pressure,"  published  in  the  '  Philosophical  Magazine '  for  May, 
1913  (pp.  687-698).] 

t  Cf.  footnote,  p.  209. 

\  Cf.  footnote,  p.  210. 

VOL.  CCX1II. A.  2   O 


._...,;     Mi;    I:    V    ->"!  Tl  I  XVKI.l,  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

The  "  Critical  Length." 

A.  E.  H.  LOVK*  has  investigated  the  rate  at  which  the  strengthening  effect  of 
circular  ends  falls  off  when  the  length  of  a  lx>iler  flue  is  increased.  His  result 
suggests  that  at  a  distance  which  is  great  compared  with  the  quantity  ^/at  the 
influence  of  the  ends  becomes  negligible,  and  the  flue  collapses  under  sensibly  the 
same  pressure  as  a  tul>e  of  infinite  length  ;  hence,  in  order  that  "  collapse  rings  "  may 
have  any  appreciable  effect,  their  distance  apart  must  not  exceed  some  experimentally- 
determined  multiple  of  this  quantity. 

The  greatest  length  of  tube  over  which  the  ends  exert  any  appreciable  strengthening 
influence,  or  the  least  length  for  which  collapse  is  possible  under  a  pressure  sensibly 
equal  to  the  critical  pressure,  has  been  called  by  Prof.  Lovst  the  "critical.  length." 
It  is  a  conception  of  great  importance  in  experimental  work;  for,  as  we  have  seen,J 
tests  on  any  length  of  tube  in  excess  of  this  limit  may  be  taken  to  give  the  strength 
of  an  infinite  length  of  the  same  tube,  and  their  results  compared  with  the  theoretical 
formula  (80)§:  but  as  a  basis  for  the  spacing  of  "collapse  rings"  it  is  superseded  by 
the  theory  of  this  paper,  which  yields  an  expression  for  the  greatest  length  of  tube 
consistent  with  stability,  when  the  thickness  and  diameter  of  the  flue,  and  also  the 
collapsing  pressure,  are  given  ;  and  Prof.  LOVE  has  suggested  to  the  author  that  it 
would  be  better  now  to  employ  the  term  "  critical  length  "  in  this  more  general 
significance.  As  we  have  seen  (p.  222),  the  length  of  the  tube  is  some  multiple  of  the 
quantity  a/q,  and  we  may  therefore  obtain  from  (83)  the  following  formula  :— 

Critical  length  =  —  Ma 


where  M  is  a  constant,  depending  upon  the  type  of  the  collapse  ring,  and  k  has 
that  integral  value  which  gives  the  least  value  for  the  right-hand  expression  of 
equation  (87). 

Before  this  subject  is  dismissed,  it  should  be  noticed  that  the  theory  of  this  paper 
does  not  support  Prof.  LOVE'S  estimate,  mentioned  above,  of  the  rate  of  decay  of  end 
effects.  The  term  in  equation  (83)  which  depends  upon  the  length  of  the  tube  may 
be  regarded  as  negligible,  compared  with  the  constant  term,  when  the  ratio 


'  Proc.  Lond.  Math.  Soc.,'  XXIV.  (1893),  p.  208. 
t  '  Theory  of  Elasticity  '  (2nd  edition),  §  337  (b). 


Page  224. 


f 

i  In  this  sense  the  term  »  critical  length  »  has  also  been  employed  by  CARMAN,  who  began  his  research 
-mg  the  strengthening  effects  of  the  end  plugs  with  which  he  sealed  his  tubes  for  test. 


MR.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  OX  THE  OKNEKAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    2'27 
has  some  sufficiently  small  value  ;  and  -2.  being  inversely  proportional  to  the  length  of 

0 

the  tube,  we  deduce  for  the  "  critical  length,"  in  the  original  sense  of  the  term,  an 
equation  of  the  form 


where  /  is  constant.     Prof.  LOVE,  as  has  been  said,  has  obtained  an  equation  of  the 
form 


which  is  very  different  ;  but  he  has  informed  the  author  that  in  the  light  of  the  above 
investigation  (pp.  210-222)  he  does  not  regard  his  method  as  adequate.* 

Solution  for  Tubular  Strut  :  Special  Case. 

We  may  obtain  another  simplification  of  the  general  determinant  to  ten  rows  by 
taking  a  zero  value  for  k.  This  corresponds  to  a  type  of  distortion,  possible  in  the 
case  of  a  tubular  strut,  in  which  the  axis  remains  straight  and  the  cross-sections 
circular,  the  diameter  varying  in  a  sinusoidal  manner. 

The  ten-row  determinant  for  this  case  is  given  on  pp.  228  and  229  ;  the  factor  —  q* 
has  been  cancelled  from  the  sixth  column,  and  terms  in  A  have  been  omitted,  so  as  to 
yield  a  result  for  tubes  collapsed  by  end  pressure  alone.  The  expansion  is  only 
correct  to  terms  of  order  r2,  and  for  a  first  approximation  we  may  also  neglect  the 
square  and  higher  powers  of  B,  which  must  be  small  in  any  case  of  practical 
importance.  Investigating  first  the  terms  which  are  independent  of  r3,  we  obtain 


We  may  now  employ  the  substitution 


.  .     .     .     (88) 

m      q* 


m      q 

in  the  determinant,  and  expand  it  from  the  top  row,  neglecting  terms  of  higher  order 
than  T*. 

A  considerable  amount  of  unnecessary  lal>our  may  be  avoided  by  a  preliminary 
examination  of  the  relative  importance  of  the  various  terms  involved.  It  will  be 

[*  Added  Mail  4-  —  -An  argument  in  favour  of  the  new  formula  may  IKJ  drawn  from  physical  considera- 
tions. The  resistance  offered  by  a  tube  to  any  given  form  of  distortion  is  due  partly  to  the  extension 
and  partly  to  the  flexure  which  such  distortion  entails  ;  and  it  is  clear  that  the  relative  importance  of  the 
extcnsional  part  increases  as  the  thickness  is  reduced.  Hence,  other  things  being  equal,  the  effects  of  the 
ends,  which  necessitate  extension  of  the  middle  surface,  are  more  important  in  a  thin  than  in  a  thick 
tube  ;  that  is  to  say,  they  are  sensible  over  a  greater  length.] 

2  O  2 


228    MI:  i:  v  sorrnu  1:1.1.  n\  TIII-:  CKNKKAI.  TIIKOKY  OF  KI.ASTIC  STABILITY. 


-[• 


I.                                              0, 

0                        1» 

1,                                          m—  1, 
0,                                            m, 
m~1  \<f(\      BY|,                  9*-l 

J-                                   0, 

»-  •••••-/-.'f 

»»—  1,                           (3m—  2) 

m—2                 4/J                   "m—  2' 
.m—  1                               m—  1                 R\~l 

2  m-2'             '                   °' 

2^"         A                                                           rt  ?/l~~  1 

m-2                        L   m-2  '  *  \        4/J' 
fi»»-l.                                  m-1 

m-2                              "m-2 
L  1  c  m  —  1  i    2/1      B  \  1              m  —  1 

m-2                                 °m_2'                      -1 
-Z2-.4.I1.                              m        B 

*•     "  hy  (  1  —        1  L 
'  L    m—2         \        4/J               m—2 

0,                                       0, 

m         B 

m-2     T'                             °' 

»»-Z      4                               OT_2  '    4  ' 

0,                                  »(   m      i  BN) 

Vm-2       4  / 

0, 


o, 


rn-2      4 


rn-2       4 


MR.  It.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    229 


o, 

0                       1-  —  ,                               0, 

•y/2' 

0, 

B 

/             B\T* 

o, 

o,                o,                   i-f. 

o, 

v"T/  sf 

o, 

I,                        -?V,                             -q*±, 

o, 

o, 

T^ 

1,                          -<7",                              -<?^> 

'  "-*-*>  ' 

o, 

6 

b 

o, 

OrP  \                -  -L  J                                               O 

o, 

o, 

o, 

0,-                             0,       •             :            -*fc*I  +  f)> 

0, 

o, 

1 

0,                           0,                                    0, 

,/  m        B\ 

o, 

m-2' 

a^  \m—  2       4  / 

0, 

Om-l                  j     B                           j     B 

0, 

o, 

"m—  2                          4                                     4 

0, 

Om-l                  Om-l,                                B\ 

1      B 

o, 

m—  2                     m—  2                          \        4  / 

4 

0, 

Om-l    ,                       m-1    , 

a/t      B\ 

1    B 

S\        4/ 

4  ' 

230    MK.  K.  v.  vH-TinvKu.  0*  TIIK  aiffeAii  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

r<..u..I  that  B'  contains  terms  in  7'  and  L,  «*  weU  as  terms  independent  of  q.     Thus 
the  complete  expression  for  B  is  of  the  form 


f\      m 

and  it  is  clear  that  B  has  a  minimum  value  when  the  axial  wave-length  has  a  finite 
value,  given  by 

v  = 


m 


This  minimum  value,  which  alone  is  of  practical  importance,  is  given,  to  a  first 
approximation  in  terms  of  T,  by  the  equation 


(89) 


so  that  the  determination  of  a  and  /8  is  not  required. 
By  expansion  of  the  determinant  we  find 

£     m 
y~~    3m-l' 

and  from  (55)  we  deduce,  for  the  minimum  thrust  required  to  produce  collapse, 

.........      (90) 


This  expression  is  correct  to  terms  in  t". 

Validity  of  Investigation  by  the  Theory  of  Thin  Shells. 

A  complete  investigation  of  the  tubular  strut  problem  must  deal  with  lobed  forms 
of  deformation,  since  it  is  possible  tbat  one  of  these  may  require  a  smaller  end-pressure 
for  its  maintenance  than  the  circular  form  treated  above.  We  have,  therefore,  to 
obtain  a  general  expression  for  B  (when  A  is  zero)  in  terms  both  of  k  and  q. 

The  derivation  of  this  expression,  if  we  employ  the  rigorous  methods  of  the  present 
paper,  will  entail  nothing  less  than  the  evaluation  of  the  complete  fifteen-row 
determinant  ;  for  the  existence  of  a  "  favourite  type  of  distortion,"  of  finite  axial 
wave-length,  which  we  have  noticed  in  the  particular  case  (k  =  0),  is  found  by 
practical  experiment  to  be  equally  a  feature  of  the  lobed  forms  of  distortion,  and 
shows  that  the  terms  in  TZ  are  important.  Now  it  will  be  shown  that  the  value  of 
Smh,.,  when  k  =  0,  may  be  obtained,  correctly  to  terms  in  t2,  by  the  ordinary  theory 
of  thin  shells  ;  and  as  there  is  no  reason  to  believe  that  the  latter  theory  will  lead  to 


MR.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  OX  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.     '231 

less  accurate  results  when  k  has  a  finite  value,  it  does  not  seem  necessary  to  employ 
iiur  more  rigorous  method,  with  the  very  laborious  calculations  which  it  entails.  We 
shall  therefore  rely  upon  the  approximate  theory  for  the  treatment  of  the  tubular 
'strut  problem  in  its  gcnrr.il  f'«>rm.  Slight  modifications  in  method  will  be  introduced, 
as  suggested  alx>ve  (pp.  224-225),  and  only  the  more  important  steps  will  be  given 
here. 

Solution  by  (tie  TJteot-y  of  Thin  Shells :  General  Case. 

We  consider  tin-  stability  of  an  element  of  the  tube,  originally  bounded  by  the 

planes 

6,     9+ S6,     and     z,     z  +  Sz, 
as  shown  Ixslow— 


The  other  dimension  of  the  element  is  the  full  thickness  of  the  tube,  denoted  in 
this  paper  by  2t.     The  radius  of  the  middle  surface  is  a. 
The  initial  stress  system  is 

P,  =  const.  =  -       -  =  [PJ  (say). 


In  the  distorted  position  this  system  produces  a  radial  force  on  the  element,  of 
amount 


.        - 

where  B  is  the  radius  of  curvature  of  a  section  of  the  distorted  element  by  an  axial 
plane  (see  fig.  5). 

It  also  produces  a  tangential  force,  in  the  direction  of  6  increasing,  of  amount 


where  -^  (see  fig.  5)  =  -  —  (l  +  «„)  Sz. 

a  06 


\IK  i;  v  MUTHWI  i.i.  ON  TIM:  <;KM:RAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 


The  above  system  of  distorting  forces  must  l>e  exactly  balanced  by  the  restoring 
system  shown  in  the  upper  part  of  the  figure.  Hence  we  obtain  the  following 
equations  of  neutral  stability  :— 


; 

R        9z      a  80       a 

8^   T,    ISP,   au,_ 

a    80      a    a  30      82  ' 


82*  +  a  80'"0'  ' 

v\Jl        m  1   Oil    ,. 

~Sz  '      l~  a~SO  ''      ' 


(91) 


Now  R  and  e,,  may  be  expressed  in  terms  of  the  displacements  of  the  middle 
surface,  as  follows : — • 

1       8V 


R    "  8z> '  :  82  ; 


(92) 


and  the  restoring  system  of  stress  resultants  may  also  be  expressed  in  terms  of  this 
system,  as  follows*  :— 

p       3DT8M/  ,     1    /  ,     a-jAI 

-ti  =  -j-\  T~  +  ~~  (u  +  ^77      . 
r  L  82      m«\        80/J 


« 


-  — 

m        a  \.8082     82; 


.     .     (93) 


where  D  is  the  quantity 


mr 
m2-! 


(94) 


<Mathc"iatiCa 


°f  Etatid^'  <80cond  editio«).  Chap.  XXIV.     u',  „',  W'  have  the 

of  thu 


MR  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  OX  THE  CENEKAL  THEOUY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.     233 

Eliminating  T,  and  T,  from  equations  (91),  and  substituting  from  (92)  and  (93),  we 
have 


u'      ^  3V  (    1  3t/  t     1 

a*          32*      a2  30     ma  3z 


t*[l  3V      1  8V      2    8V       3V        1    3V       tii-l  1_3V_~| 
3  La4  30"     a4  S04      a*  30*32*      82*      m«*  32*  "       m    «*  3032*.]  = 

I    P^      1  aV     m-1  8V  .  /m+1      .  \  1  3V 
a»  30     a1  36s       2m    3z»     \  2m  '      /a  303z 


_^n<V  ,13V      1    3V  m- 1  1  3 VI 
~  3  L<?  30      a4  dP      a*  30  82*        m    a*  82*  J  * 

J_  <to/     m  +  1  1   8V      m-1  1  8V     3V  = 

o«.  o™    „»  2tf*        a.**   "       ' 


82  "     2m   a  3032       2m  a*  30*    "  82* 


(95) 


where 


(96) 


Assuming  a  solution  of  the  type  (56),  we  find,  as  the  criterion  for  neutral  stability, 


m        a 
m  —  1  „»  i  i  w»— 1    , 


m     '  a" 


m+1    ;, 
2m 


m 

m  +  1 
2m 

m— 1 


=  0. 


(97) 


This  equation,  in  its  expanded  form,  is 


t4  +  3/ty  +  2 


^=1  g4]}  =  0. 
nr 


(98) 


Taking  first  the  terms  which  are  independent  of  t1,  and  neglecting  the  square  of 
(which  must  be  small),  we  find,  as  the  first  term  in  our  solution, 


m*-l 


m 


(99) 


VOL.    CCXIII. — A. 


2  H 


234     MR.  R-  V.  SOrrmVKLL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 
When  k  =  0,  this  becomes 


»ia-l    1  .....  (100 

m*      q3' 


which  shows  that  q  must  be  great,  if  *  has  a  value  possible  in  practice.  Similarly, 
when  k  >0,  we  see  that  q  must  be  small,  and  the  approximate  expression  m  this 
case  is 

4,_^!nl  __  2l_  .....    (101) 

m*    F(*3+l) 

We  may  now  determine  sufficiently  approximate  expressions  for  the  terms  in  t2/a3, 
by  treating  q  as  great  when  k  =  0,  and  as  small  when  k>  1.  That  is  to  say,  we 
retain  only  the  highest  and  the  lowest  powers  of  q  in  the  two  cases* 

Thus,  when  k  =  0,  the  important  terms  are 


and  we  have 


a  > 
a? 


or 

(102) 


When  k  >  1,  the  important  terms  are 


i94  +  i-^4(^-1)2  =  0'     •     •     •     •     (103) 

771  t* 


whence,  to  terms  in  t^/a3, 

m'-i 


_m8-!        q3  iFjF-l)^2 

m2    F(P+1)     *ga    F+l    a2' 


with  sufficient  accuracy,  when  q  is  small. 
This  leads  to  the  result 


For  practical  purposes  only  the  stationary  values  of  S  are  important.     It  is  readily 
seen  that  the  minimum  value  obtained  from  (102)  agrees  with  (90),  and  is  therefore 

*  In  every  case  it  is  legitimate  for  practical  purposes  to  neglect  the  term  in  ¥2. 


Ml;.   K.   V.  SMITH  WELL  ON  THE  GEXKKAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.     L'.'if) 

accurate  as  far  as  terms  in  t3;  we  shall  assume  that  (104)  gives  the  same  approxi- 
mation, which  for  practical  purfxises  is  quite  sufficient.  We  then  find,  for  values  of  k 
other  than  0  and  1,  the  expression 


When  k  =  1,  the  axis  does  not  remain  straight  after  distortion  of  the  tube  has 
occurml.  This  is  the  type  of  distortion  (sometimes  called  "  primary  flexure  ")  which 
was  discussed  by  ?]UI,KK,  and  it  is  easy  to  see  that  his  result  is  identical  with  that  of 
equation  (104),  which  Incomes  in  this  case 


(106) 


The  exact  expression  for  the  length  of  the  tube,  in  terms  of  q,  is  not  a  matter  of 
great  importance  in  the  present  problem,  because  the  wave-length  corresponding  to  a 
minimum  value  of  the  collapsing  pressure  is  in  all  cases  small,  and  the  strength  of 
iiny  strut  of  ordinary  dimensions  will  therefore  be  given  by  equations  (90)  or  (105), 
into  which  the  li-n^th  does  not  enter.  As  in  the  case  of  the  boiler-flue  problem,  we 


\Murs  ofZj  4  6  8 

Fig.  6.     Strength  of  Tubular  Struts. 


10 


12 


may  illustrate  the  effects  of  length  upon  the  collapsing  thrust  by  plotting  the 
intensity  of  stress,  or  Sfj^at,  against  q~\  For  this  purpose  we  must  take  some 
definite  value  of  the  ratio  t/a,  and  draw  separate  curves  for  different  integral  values 
of  k.  The  result  is  shown  by  tig.  6,  in  which  the  following  values  are  assumed  :— 


m  = 


E  =  3  x  107  pounds  per  sq.  inch. 

=  2 '07  x  10"  dynes  per  sq.  cm. 
2  H  2 


Mi;    I,    v    sorTHWKLL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

From  an  inspection  of  these  curves  it  is  easily  seen  that  as  the  axial  wave-length 
increases  the  type  of  distortion  which  involves  the  least  value  for  the  collapsing 
thrust  (and  which  the  tube  therefore  tends  naturally  to  assume)  changes.  For  very 
short  lengths  we  shall  expect  the  circular  type  (k  =  0) ;  then,  as  the  length  increases, 
lobed  forms  of  distortion,  in  which  the  value  of  k  becomes  less  as  the  length  increases. 
The  limit  is  reached  when  k  =  1  ;  hence,  the  tendency  of  very  long  tubes  is  always  to 
collapse  in  the  manner  discussed  by  EULER. 

It  is  also  to  be  noticed  that  those  parts  of  the  different  curves  which  lie  to  the 
right  of  their  lowest  points  have  no  practical  significance.  The  actual  curve,  which 
shows  the  effect  of  length  upon  the  value  of  the  collapsing  thrust,  will  approximate 
to  the  form  shown  in  thick  lines,  since  the  wave-length  (which  varies  as  q~l)  will 
naturally  not  increase  beyond  that  value  which  involves  the  least  collapsing  thrust. 

Comparison  with  Existing  Formula. 

The  formulje  of  equations  (90)  and  (104)  may  be  compared  with  the  results  of  other 
discussions  of  this  problem.  Equation  (90)  has  been  obtained  by  LORENZ,*  and 

LILLY*  has  given  the  same  result,  except  that  the  factor  A/  -m—-  is  omitted. t 

The  only  existing  solution  for  lobed  forms  of  distortion  is  due  to  LORENZ,*  and  this 
is  not  in  agreement  with  equation  (104).  In  support  of  the  latter  formula  it  may  be 
urged  that  LORENZ'  formula  does  not  agree  with  EULER'S  result  when  k  =  1. 

It  may  also  be  remarked  that  the  foregoing  results  for  the  tubular  strut  problem 
contradict  BRYAN'S  theorem,  that  a  closed  shell  cannot  fail  by  instability,  because 
distortion  would  involve  extension  of  the  middle  surface;  for  although  the  first 
terms  in  equations  (102)  and  (104)  are  due  solely  to  extension  of  the  middle 
surface,  yet  the  compressive  stress  at  collapse,  as  given  by  (90)  or  (105),  may  be 
insufficient  to  produce  elastic  breakdown  in  the  position  of  equilibrium,  if  the  ratio 

-  has  a  sufficiently  low  value. 

Stability  of  Tubes  under  Combined  End  and  Surface  Pressure. 

We  shall  not  treat  this  case  in  any  detail,  but  it  requires  notice  in  connection  with 
the  "  localization  of  collapse  "  which  is  observed  in  experiments  conducted  upon  long 
tubes  tested  under  hydrostatic  pressure,  the  permanent  distortion  being  generally 
confined  to  a  portion  only  of  the  length  of  the  tube.  This  result  is  not  predicted  by 
the  theoretical  formula  (83),  which  suggests  a  steady  fall  in  the  value  of  the  collapsing 
pWMure  as  the  wave-length  increases  ;  and  a  partial  explanation  may  possibly  be 
found  in  the  fact  that  the  method  of  test  has  generally  left  a  wholly  or  partially 

*  Cf.  footnote,  p.  209. 

t  For  a  similar  omission  in  a  solution  of  the  boiler-flue  problem  cf.  p.  225. 


MR.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    237 

ii  n  lialanced  end-thrust,  due  to  the  water  pressure  acting  upon  the  closed  ends  of  the 
t  ul>e. 

It  is  clear  that  the  expansion  of  the  general  fifteen-row  determinant  will  give  an 

equation  of  the  form 

...  =  0, 


where  a,  ft,  y...  depend  upon  the  dimensions  of  the  tube  and  the  type  of  the 
distortion.  But  in  any  practical  case,  as  we  have  already  observed,  A  and  B  must  be 
very  small  quantities.  It  follows  that  an  approximate  solution  may  l»  obtained  from 
the  terms 

0  ..........     (107) 


])  .-ui'l  S  I"-  ill'-  \.-ilui-s  ..r  the  extent*]  pn-^mv  .-UK  I  <>f  il  .....  ml-  thrust,  r.-idi  <.f 
which,  acting  alone,  could  produce  collapse  into  the  assumed  type  of  distortion.  Then 
equation  (107)  may  clearly  be  written  as  follows  :— 


(108) 


where  $,  and  S  are  the  values  of  the  external  pressure  and  end-thrust  which  can 
produce  collapse  when  acting  in  conjunction. 

It  may  be  seen  from  this  equation  that  $,  can  have  a  minimum  value  for  some  finite 
value  of  the  axial  wave-length  when,  and  only  when,  <&  exists.  If  the  end-thrust  be 
entirely  unl>alaneed,  we  have 

,,    .........     (109) 


and  the  collapsing  pressure  may,  in  this  case,  be  determined  from  equation  (108). 

GENERAL  THEORY  OF  INSTABILITY  IN  MATERIALS  OF  FINITE  STRENGTH. 
The  Practical  Value  of  a  Theory  of  Instability. 

In  the  concluding  section  of  this  paper  an  attempt  will  be  made  to  estimate  the 
practical  value  of  a  theory  of  elastic  instability ;  to  suggest  ways  in  which  we  may 
hope  to  increase  this  value ;  and  to  indicate  the  questions  to  which  answers  must  be 
found  in  order  that  further  advance  may  be  possible. 

The  first  point  which  must  be  noticed  is  the  non-realization  in  practice  of  our 
conception  of  a  "  critical  loading,"  owing  to  imperfections  which  always  exist,  and 
which  violate  our  ideal  assumptions.  In  any  actual  example  the  displacement  of  the 
system  increases  continuously  with  the  load,  and  the  system  collapses  at  a  smaller 
value  of  the  load  than  our  theory  would  dictate.  It  is  necessary  to  inquire  whether 
serious  discrepancies  are  to  be  expected. 

In  some  mechanical  problems  the  effects  of  imperfections  may  be  calculated.  We 
may  take,  as  an  example,  the  system  illustrated  in  fig.  1,  and  consider  any  one  of  the 


Mi:.   U.  V.  sol  TIIUKI.I.  ON  Till:  OIWEEAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

many  ii,,rrfections  which  occur  in  practice.  For  simplicity,  let  us  assume  that  the 
sph.-'r.-.  l"wl,  ami  pluiitf-r  are  still  smooth,  rigid,  and  accurately  formed,  but  that 
tli.-  line  of  thrust  of  the  plunger  is  eccentric  by  an  amount  S.  It  is  easy  to  see  from 
ti-  7  that  the  displacement  of  the  sphere  from  the  line  of  thrust  of  the  plunger,  when 
the  system  is  in  equilibrium  under  a  load  P,  is 

d  =  r  sin  6  =  A+(R-r)  sin  0,1 

where  L   .  (110) 

_P  _        tan  0       . 

W  ~~  tan  6- tan  $ 

and  these  equations  enable  us  to  trace  the  steady  increase  of  the  sphere's  displacement 
as  the  load  on  the  plunger  is  increased  from  a  zero  value. 


o  Values  of  d. 


i-or 


Fig.  7. 


Fig.  8. 


Thus  in  fig.  8  curves  are  drawn  to  connect  P  and  d,  for  a  value  3  of  the  ratio  R/r, 
when  the  initial  displacement  S  has  the  values  0,  O'Olr,  and  O'lr  respectively.  At 
the  points  on  these  curves  for  which  P  has  a  maximum  value,  "  collapse  "  will  occur, 
since  the  equilibrium  then  becomes  unstable.  The  locus  of  these  points  is  shown  in 
the  figure  by  a  broken  line,  and  a  dot-and-dash  line  shows  the  connection  between  S 
and  the  maximum  value  of  P.  From  the  latter  curve  it  is  evident  that  a  small 
initial  inaccuracy  may  cause  a  material  reduction  in  the  "  collapsing  load " ;  never- 
theless the  "  critical  load  "  gives  a  limit  which  will  be  more  and  more  nearly  attained 
as  our  experimental  accuracy  is  improved,  and  its  investigation  is  by  no  means  useless 
for  practical  purposes. 

When  the  problem  is  one  of  elastic  stability,  the  discussion  of  imperfections  by 
analytical  methods  will,  in  general,  be  beyond  our  power ;  but  it  is  clear  that  similar 
remarks  will  apply.  An  "  exchange  of  stabilities  "  at  some  "  point  of  bifurcation  "* 
must  be  regarded  as  a  purely  ideal  conception,  and  in  practice  there  will  always  be  a 
steady  increase  of  distortion  as  the  load  is  increased,  owing  principally  to  practical 
imperfections  of  form.  A  strut,  for  example,  may  be  very  accurately  loaded,  if 
suitable  methods  are  employed,  but  its  centre-line  will  never  be  quite  straight ;  the 
initial  deflection  which  characterizes  it  may  be  regarded  as  composed  of  a  series  of 

*  H.  POIXCARE,  '  Acta  Mathomatica,'  7.     (1885),  p.  259. 


Mi:.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  TIIK  « iKNT.i: AL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.     239 

harmonic  terms,  and  when  the  load  is  applied  one  of  these  harmonics  will  be 
developed  very  much  more  than  the  others,  just  as  one  constituent  harmonic  may  be 
developed  by  "  resonance  "  in  an  alternating  current  wave  of  irregular  shape.  In  the 
ordinary  strut  problem  this  in.i^nifi.-il  liannonir  is  sin-b  that  one-half  wave  occupies 
the  length  of  the  strut,  but  in  other  problems,  such  .'is  that  of  the  tubular  strut, 
though  there  is  always  a  "  favourite "  or  "  natural  harmonic "  which  is  especially 
magnified,  its  relation  to  the  dimensions  may  l>e  more  complicated.*  In  any  case  the 
effects  of  practical  imperfections  of  form  might  be  studied,  if  the  analytical  difficulties 
could  t)e  surmounted,  by  investigating  the  rate  at  which  the  amplitude  of  this 
"  natural  harmonic "  increases  with  the  load,  when  its  value  in  the  initial  configu- 
ration is  given  ;  and  the  results  of  the  investigation  might  be  shown  graphically  by 
curves  of  distortion,  similar  in  character  to  the  curves  of  fig.  8,  in  which  the  aljscissae 
represented  the  amplitude  of  the  natural  harmonic,  and  the  ordinates  represented  the 
magnitude  of  the  applied  stress-system,  or  "  load." 

These  "  curves  of  distortion  "  are  of  considerable  utility  for  the  study  01  problems 
in  elastic  stability,  even  though  their  true  form  can  only  be  guessed.  They  help  us, 
for  example,  to  explain,  and  in  some  degree  to  remedy,  the  serious  discrepancy 
existing  between  EULEK'S  theory  and  the  results  of  experiments  on  short  struts. 
The  discrepancy  has  often  been  attributed  to  practical  imperfections  of  form  ;  but  it 
should  hardly  be  necessary  to  point  out  that  practical  imperfections  are  likely  to 
diminish  rather  than  to  increase  in  importance,  as  the  dimensions  of  an  elastic  solid 
become  more  nearly  comparable,  so  that  they  will  never  be  more  effective  as  causes  of 
weakness  than  in  struts  of  great  length,  which,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  give  results  in 
close  agreement  with  EULER'S  formula. 

A  more  satisfactory  explanation  of  this,  and  of  similar  discrepancies  in  other 
problems,  may  be  found  in  the  fact  that  the  ordinary  theory  of  elastic  stability 
neglects  the  possibility  of  elastic  break-down.  If  we  attempt  to  draw  "  curves  of 
distortion  "  for  any  single  problem,  we  shall  find  that,  apart  from  the  other  data  of 
the  problem,  three  possible  cases  exist,  depending  upon  the  elastic  limit  of  the  material 
under  consideration : — 

(1)  The  material  may  be  of  infinite  strength  ; 

(2)  Its  elastic  limit  may  be  so  high  that  the  critical  load,  as  determined  by  the 

theory  of  instability,   is  not   sufficient  to   cause  elastic  break-down  in  the 
configuration  of  equilibrium ; 

(3)  Elastic  break-down  may  occur,  even  in  the  position  of  equilibrium,  at  a  load  less 

than  the  critical  value. 

In  the  first  case  (which  is,  of  course,  purely  ideal),  the  distortion  due  to  loading 
will  vanish  when  the  loading  is  removed,  and  in  this  sense  we  may  say  that  the 

*  In  the  problem  of  the  tubulur  strut,  the  "  favourite  harmonic  "  is,  of  course,  defined  by  that  value  of  q 
which  corresponds  to  a  minimum  value  of  J  in  equations  (102)  or  (104). 


240    MB.  R.  V.  SOUTH \\KI.I,  ON  THK  CKNKKAL  THKOKY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

material  will  never  fail  The  "  curves  of  distortion,"  if  we  could  determine  their  true 
sli:.|*',  would  probably  be  approximately  of  the  form  shown  in  fig.  9.  The  theoretical 
methods  of  this  paper  enable  us  to  fix  the  position  of  A,  the  "  point  of  bifurcation," 
but  give  no  information  as  to  the  form  of  AB,  beyond  the  fact  that  it  cuts  OA  at 
right  angles.*  The  other  curves  of  the  diagram  will  approach  more  and  more  closely 
the  limiting  form  OAB  as  the  initial  value  of  the  amplitude  is  decreased. 

In  the  second  case,  we  have  the  additional  complication  of  elastic  break-down 
under  finite  stress,  which  reduces  the  resistance  of  the  material  and  causes  the  new 
"curves  of  distortion,"  shown  by  thick  lines  in  fig.  10,  to  begin  at  certain  points  to 
fall  away  from  the  corresponding  curves  of  fig.  9  (reproduced  in  fine  lines  for  com- 
parison) ;  these  points  will  lie  on  some  line  such  as  CD,  cutting  OA  at  a  point 
above  A,  and  it  is  clear  that  to  the  right  of  CD  the  curves  of  distortion  refer  to 
displacements  which  do  not  wholly  vanish  when  the  load  is  removed.  Total  collapse 
of  the  system  will  obviously  occur  at  the  points  of  maximum  load  on  the  curves  of 
distortion,  and  the  locus  of  these  points,  which  is  shown  on  the  diagram  by  the 
dot-and-dash  line  EF,  may  lie  termed  the  "  line  of  final  collapse." 


Amplitude 
Fig.  9 


Natural 
Fig.  10. 


Harmonic. 

Fig.  11. 


A  knowledge  of  the  true  form  of  EF  would  enable  us,  when  we  are  given  the  initial 
value  of  the  amplitude,  to  predict  the  load  at  which  the  system  will  collapse ;  and 
these  quantities  could  be  connected  by  another  curve  AG,  which  would  show 
at  once  whether  the  resistance  of  the  system  to  collapse  is  seriously  reduced  by 
practical  inaccuracies  of  form.  A  complete  theory  of  any  problem  in  elastic  stability 
must  yield  information  on  this  very  important  point,  as  well  as  an  expression  for  the 
"  critical  load  "  ;  but  in  most  cases  more  powerful  methods  would  be  needed  for  its 
derivation  than  are  at  present  available.  The  investigation  of  the  "  critical  load"  is 
therefore  not  without  utility,  for  although  never  realized  in  practice,  this  forms  a  limit 
which  should  be  fairly  closely  approached  when  considerable  accuracy  is  possible. 

In  our  third  case  the  "  critical  load,"  as  deduced  by  theoretical  methods,  is  more 
than  sufficient  to  cause  elastic  break-down.  We  may  proceed  as  before  to  draw 
hypothetical  curves  of  distortion.  The  line  CT)'  (fig.  11),  which  corresponds  to  the 

*  It  must  not  be  assumed  that  AB  is  a  horizontal  straight  line;  in  general,  since  the  distorting 
effect  of  the  applied  stress-system,  which  varies  as  the  deflection,  increases  less  rapidly  than  the 
resistance,  which  varies  as  the  curvature,  AB  will  tend  to  rise  from  A. 


MR.  R.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.     241 

\\iw  CD  of  fig.  10,  will  intersect  OA  at  a  point  below  A,  and  the  other  curves  of 
distortion  at  correspondingly  lower  points.  We  have  seen  that  the  effect  of  local 
elastic  breakdown  upon  fig.  10  was  to  deflect  the  curves  of  distortion  from  the  forms 
which  they  would  have  assumed  if  the  material  had  possessed  indefinite  strength ; 
and  it  is  clear  that  this  deflection  will  begin  at  lower  values  of  the  loads  in  the 
present  case.  We  may  therefore  expect  curves  of  the  type  shown  in  thick  lines  in 
fig.  11,  where  the  curves  already  obtained  are  reproduced  in  fine  lines  for  comparison. 
As  before,  we  may  draw  a  line  A'F  "of  final  collapse"  through  the  points  of 
maximum  load  on  the  curves  of  distortion,  and  connect  the  collapsing  load  with  the 
initial  value  of  the  amplitude  by  another  curve  A'G'. 

It  is  clear  that  the  curves  of  distortion  must  tend  to  a  limit  which  is  no  longer 
OAH,  but  some  other  curve  OA'H',  where  OA',  the  critical  load  under  the  new 
conditions,  is  more  than  sufficient  to  produce  elastic  breakdown,  but  less  than  OA. 
We  can  see  further  that  the  curve  A'G'  is  not  likely  to  fall  away  from  A'  much  more 
steeply  than  AG  from  A  in  fig.  10.  The  great  weakness  of  short  struts  in  practice, 
compared  with  EULER'S  theoretical  estimate,  is  now  explained.  Whereas  long  struts 
come  within  the  conditions  of  fig.  10,  the  failure  of  short  struts  will  be  repre- 
sented by  fig.  11,  and  occurs  at  comparatively  low  stresses,  not  because  practical 
imperfections  have  a  greater  effect  upon  the  strength,  but  because  OA',  the  true 
value  of  the  critical  load,  is  less  than  OA,  the  value  which  EULER'S  theory  would 
dictate.* 

It  is  the  rule,  rather  than  the  exception,  that  the  critical  load,  as  found  by  the 
ordinary  theory  of  elastic  stability,  is  more  than  sufficient  in  practice  to  produce 
elastic  break-down.  This  may  be  readily  seen  in  reference  to  any  particular  example. 
In  the  case  of  the  tubular  strut,  fig.  10  is  only  applicable  when  the  ratio  of  diameter  to 
thickness  is  greater  than  560  (for  an  average  quality  of  mild  steel),  and  for  thicker 
tubes  the  critical  load  falls,  apparently  by  a  very  considerable  amount, t  below  the 
theoretical  estimate.  The  determination  of  the  critical  load,  in  cases  where  this  is 
more  than  sufficient  to  produce  elastic  break-down,  is  thus  a  problem  of  great 
importance,  since  it  forms  a  limit  which  can  never,  under  any  circumstances,  be 
exceeded.  In  the  ordinary  strut  problem  the  determination  can  be  effected  without 
difficulty,  and  an  apparently  new  field  is  thus  indicated  for  research.  The  distin- 
guishing feature  of  its  problems  is  the  dependence  of  the  stress-strain  relations  upon 
the  past  history  of  the  material,  rendering  absolutely  necessary  a  method  which 
follows  the  actual  cycle  of  events  up  to  the  occurrence  of  collapse. 

[*  Added  May  11. — Since  this  paper  was  written,  the  author's  attention  has  been  drawn  to  a 
dissertation  by  T.  VON  K  A  KM  AN  (' Untersuchungen  uber  Knickfestigkeit,'  Berlin,  1909),  in  which  the 
forms  of  these  "  curves  of  distortion,"  for  solid  struts  of  practical  dimensions,  are  deduced  both  from  theory 
and  from  experiments.  KARMA'N  also  gives  a  relation  equivalent  to  that  of  equation  (112).] 

t  Experiments  conducted  by  the  author  upon  seamless  steel  tubes  showed  failure  under  loads  which 
were  in  every  case  little  more  than  sufficient  to  produce  "  permanent  set." 

VOL.  CCXIII. A.  2   I 


MS    MH.  R  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY. 

Stability  of  Short  Struts. 

This  problem  has  been  discussed  elsewhere  by  the  author,*  and  it  will  be  noticed 
here  only  at  sufficient  length  to  indicate  the  directions  in  which  further  research  is 
needed.  We  have  to  derive  an  expression  for  the  collapsing  load  of  a  straight  strut, 
when  this  is  more  than  sufficient  to  cause  elastic  break-down  of  the  material ;  and  we 
proceed  as  before  by  considering  three  configurations  of  the  strut :  (l)  before  strain ; 
(2)  in  a  position  of  neutral  equilibrium  under  uniform  end-thrust;  and  (3)  in  a 
position  of  infinitesimal  distortion  from  the  second  configuration. 

For  a  first  approximation  we  may  say  that  cross-sections  remain  plane  in  the  third 
configuration,  so  that  the  diagram  of  longitudinal  compressive  strain  for  any  cross- 
section  is  as  shown  in  the  upper  part  of  fig.  12  ;  the  horizontal  line  fg  shows  the 


f  Diagram  F  of  G  Strra     K 


Strain. 


Fig.  12.  Fig.  13. 

uniform  strain  of  the  second  configuration.  Then,  if  fig.  13  be  the  stress-strain 
diagram  for  a  compression  test  of  our  material,  and  this  uniform  strain  corresponds  to 
a  stress  p  which  is  represented  by  the  point  B,  we  see  that  to  the  right  of  the  point 
F  in  fig.  12  the  longitudinal  compressive  stress  in  the  third  configuration  must  be 
greater,  and  to  the  left  less  than  p. 

Now  it  is  a  well-known  property  of  metals  that  if  at  any  point  B  on  the  stress- 
strain  diagram,  beyond  the  elastic  limit,  we  begin  to  decrease  the  load,  the  diagram 
is  not  retraced,  but  that  we  obtain  a  line  BC  which  is  parallel  to  OA.t  It  follows 
that  the  ratio  decrease  of  stress 

decrease  of  strain 

is  still  given  by  E,  YOUNG'S  Modulus  for  the  material.  On  the  other  hand,  the 
diagram  shows  that  if  we  increase  the  load  beyond  B  by  an  infinitesimal  amount,  the 

r:itl"  •  P 

increase  of  stress 
increase  of  strain 

is  a  smaller  quantity  E',  which  may  be  found  from  the  slope  of  the  diagram  at  B. 

*  '  Engineering,'  August  23,  1912. 

t  A.  MORLEY,  'Strength  of  Materials,'  §  42. 


MR.  K.  V.  SOUTHWELL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY.    243 

We  are  considering  an  infinitesimal  distortion  in  the  third  position,  so  that  if  we 
represent  the  increase  of  strain  in  fig.  12  by  \z,  the  increase  of  longitudinal  com- 
pressive  stress  to  the  right  of  F  may  be  taken  as  E'Xz,  and  the  decrease  of  this  stress 
to  the  left  of  F  as  EXz.  Hence  we  obtain,  for  the  section  under  consideration,  the 
diagram  of  longitudinal  stress  which  is  shown  in  the  lower  part  of  fig.  12.  The 
uniform  stress  of  the  second  configuration  is  shown  by  the  horizontal  line  In,  and  it  is 
a  condition  for  neutral  stability  in  the  second  configuration  that  no  increase  of  thrust 
shall  be  required  to  maintain  the  distortion.  If  the  cross-section  of  the  strut  is 
rectangular,  of  dimensions  a  x  2t,  it  follows  that  the  triangles  Imk  and  qmn  must  be 
equal  in  area,  or 

19?  -E  (111) 

PF~E'' 

This  relation  fixes  the  position  of  F  on  the  cross-section,  and  in  terms  of  the 
dimensions  shown  in  fig.  12  we  may  write  for  the  moment  of  resistance  about  G, 

M  =r+*E'a\2(z  -6)^2+1°    Ea\z(z-b)dz 


But   if  y  is   the   deflection   of  the   strut   at   the   point   G,  in   the  infinitesimal 
distortion,  we  have,  as  in  the  ordinary  theory  of  bending, 


where  x  denotes  the  distance  of  the  section  from  one  end  ;  and  for  equilibrium  in  the 
third  configuration  M  must  be  equal  to  the  bending  moment  due  to  thrust,  or  2atpy  : 
hence, 


Equation  (112)  shows  the  modification  which  must  be  introduced,  to  take  account 
of  elastic  break-down,  into  EULER'S  equation 


(113) 


and  it  is  easy  to  see  that  if  I  is  the  length,  calculated  from  (113),  of  a  strut  which 
can  just  support  the  stress  p,  and  I'  the  length  as  calculated  from  (112),  then 


But,  from  (111), 

t  +  b  _       /E 
t^b~  V  W 


2  I  2 


•j»4     MK.  IS.  \.  SiMTWVKLL  ON  THE  GENERAL  THEORY  OF  ELASTIC  STABILITY, 
so  that,  finally, 

T-— ^ <1U> 


This  result  leads  to  a  simple  method  by  which  the  collapsing  loads  of  short  struts 
may  be  obtained  graphically  from  the  compressive  stress-strain  diagram.  A  full 
explanation  is  given  in  the  paper  to  which  reference  has  already  been  made,  and  a 
comparison,  showing  satisfactory  agreement,  is  made  with  the  results  of  experiments. 
One  conclusion  of  some  practical  importance  may  be  noticed :  the  curves  of  collapsing 
stress  show  that  great  ductility  of  material  is  by  no  means  desirable  in  struts, 
the  primary  requisite  being  a  high  elastic  limit. 

Need  for  Further  Research.     Conclusion. 

With  slight  modification,  the  theory  just  given  for  short  struts  might  be  applied  to 
the  problem  of  circular  rings  under  radial  pressure  ;  but  these  appear  to  be  the  only 
cases  in  which  we  can  at  present  discuss  the  stability  of  overstrained  material.  In 
any  problem  dealing  with  plates  or  shells  distortion  from  the  equilibrium  position 
must  introduce  new  stresses,  in  directions  perpendicular  to  that  of  the  stress  which 
has  caused  elastic  failure.  The  circular  type  of  distortion  in  a  tubular  strut,  for 
example,  will  introduce  "  hoop  "  stresses,  and  at  present  we  have  no  knowledge  of  the 
corresponding  stress-strain  relations  when  "  set "  has  occurred. 

This  and  many  other  stability  problems  may  be  regarded  as  special  cases  of  a 
general  problem,  viz.,  the  determination  of  the  changes  of  strain  which  occur  when  an 
infinitesimal  stress-system,  defined  by  principal  stresses  g,  r,  s,  is  impressed  upon  a 
material  already  overstrained  by  a  simple  stress  p.  The  problem  is  not  simple,  and 
its  solution  would  probably  entail  much  theoretical  and  experimental  work ;  but  this 
would  be  justified  by  the  importance,  both  for  theory  and  practice,  of  its  applications. 

In  conclusion,  the  author  desires  to  express  his  indebtedness  to  Profs.  LOVE  and 
HOPKINSON,  for  valuable  criticism  and  advice ;  to  Mr.  L.  S.  PALMER,  for  the  photo- 
graphs reproduced  in  fig.  2 ;  and  to  Messrs.  H.  J.  HOWARD  and  D.  P.  SCOTT,  for 
assistance  in  the  prosecution  of  the  experiments  described  on  p.  223.  He  also  takes 
this  opportunity  of  thanking  Messrs.  Stewarts  and  Lloyds,  Ltd.,  of  Glasgow,  for 
gifts  of  very  accurate  steel  tube  for  experimental  purposes. 


[     245     ] 


VI.  Some  Phenomena  of  Sunspots  and  of  Terrestrial  Magnetism. — Part  II. 

liy  C.  CHREE,  Sc.D.,  LL.D.,  F.R.S.,  Superintendent  of  Kew  Observatory. 

Received  June  10,— Read  June  26,  1913. 

CONTENTS. 
§§ 

1.  Introductory 245 

2.  International  magnetic  "  character "  figures 246 

3-6.  27-day  period  in  international  "  character  "  figures 247 

7-8.  Subsequent  and  previous  associated  "  pulses  " 250 

9-11.  Estimates  of  length  of  period 255 

12-13.  Relations  between  primary  and  associated  pulses 258 

14-15.  Comparison  of  previous  and  subsequent  associated  days  in  1890  to  1900 261 

16.  Annual  variation  in  27-day  period 263 

17-18.  Relation  of  magnetic  "  character  "  figures  to  sunspot  areas 267 

19.  Sunspot  areas,  projected  and  corrected,  faculse  and  WOI.FER'S  sunspot  frequencies   .     .  271 

2Q.  Amplitude  of  27-28-day  period  in  projected  sunspot  areas 274 

21-22.  Concluding  remarks 275 

§  1.  IN  a  previous  paper,  described  here  for  brevity  as  S.M.,*  whicb  referred  to 
sunspots  and  terrestrial  magnetism,  I  had  occasion  to  enquire  into  the  existence  of 
any  relation  between  the  magnetic  character  of  individual  days  and  that  of  days 
separated  from  them  by  a  given  interval  of  time.  References  to  previous  work 
bearing  on  the  subject  will  be  found  in  S.M.,  p.  97. 

The  material  of  which  I  made  principal  use  consisted  of  magnetic  "  character " 
figures — on  the  international  scale  0  (quiet),  1  (moderately  disturbed),  and  2  (highly 
disturbed) — assigned  by  myself  to  all  the  days  of  the  eleven  years  1890  to  1900,  from 
consideration  of  the  Kew  magnetic  curves. 

In  each  of  the  132  months  of  the  eleven  years  the  five  days  were  taken  which  gave 
the  largest  daily  range  to  the  magnetic  horizontal  force.  In  default  of  any  more 
satisfactory  means  of  selection,  the  660  days  thus  obtained  were  taken  as  representative 
of  disturbed  conditions.  Regarding  any  one  of  the  selected  days  as  day  n,  the 
"  character"  figures  for  the  41  successive  days  n— 5ton  +  35  were  written  down  in  a 
row.  This  was  done  for  each  of  the  660  selected  days  in  succession,  so  that  there 
were  in  all  41  columns  of  figures,  each  containing  660  entries. 

*  'Phil.  Trans.,'  A,  vol.  212,  p.  75. 
VOL.  CCXIII. A    502.  Publiihed  »epar»telj,  Augurt  8,  1913. 


,J46  PR.  C.  CHREE:   SOME  PHENOMENA  OF  SUXSI'OTS 

The  "  character  "  figures  in  each  column  were  then  added  up  as  if  they  were  purely 
arithmetical  quantities,  and  an  arithmetic  mean  was  taken.  This  was  regarded  as  a 
measure  of  the  disturbance  existent  on  the  representative  day  of  the  column.  Thus 
the  means  for  columns  n,  n-1,  and  »  +  l  represented  respectively  the  amount  of 
disturbance  on  the  typical  selected  disturbed  day,  and  on  the  days  immediately 
preceding  and  following  it.  These  mean  "  character"  figures  showed  in  the  clearest 
way  the  existence  of  a  period  somewhat  in  excess  of  27  days,  but  no  shorter  period 
was  disclosed.  This  implied  that  if  any  day  were  considerably  more  disturbed  than 
the  average  day  of  the  month,  then  the  day  27  days  subsequent  to  it  was  likely  to  be 
also  more  disturbed  than  usual 

The  acceptance  of  the  arithmetic  mean  of  a  number  of  "  character"  figures  as  itself 
a  measure  of  magnetic  disturbance  is  open  to  criticism  on  several  grounds.  There  is  no 
strict  line  of  demarcation  between  the  three  classes  of  days.  There  are  in  reality  an 
infinite  variety  of  grades  intermediate  between  the  extremely  quiet  day,  which  cannot 
get  less  than  "  0,"  and  the  extremely  disturbed  day  which  cannot  get  more  than  "2." 
Some  days  to  which  "  2  "  is  allotted  represent  disturbances  whose  energy  on  any 
conceivable  view  must  be  immensely  more  than  twice — possibly  more  than  twenty 
times— the  energy  of  disturbance  on  the  average  day  of  character  "  1."  The 
procedure  was  suggested  by  the  practice  followed  at  de  Bilt,  where  the  "  character  " 
figures  supplied  by  the  different  observatories  are  dealt  with.  Supposing  data  to  be 
supplied  by,  say,  40  observatories,  the  40  figures  assigned  to  any  one  day  are  summed 
and  the  mean  taken  to  the  nearest  O'l,  and  the  result  is  accepted  as  an  international 
measure  of  the  amount  of  magnetic  disturbance  on  the  day  in  question. 

§  2.  The  "  character"  figures  in  S.M.  were  based  on  the  curves  of  only  one  station, 
Kew ;  they  were  assigned  by  a  single  individual,  myself ;  and  they  referred  to  one 
period  of  years,  1890  to  1900.  I  have  thus  thought  it  desirable  to  repeat  the 
investigation  for  a  second  period  of  years,  1906  to  1911,  making  use  of  the  inter- 
national "character"  figures  published  at  de  Bilt.  1906  was  the  earliest  year  for 
which  international  figures  existed,  and  1911  was  the  latest  for  which  these  figures 
were  complete  when  the  present  enquiry  commenced.  As  before,  five  days  were 
selected  for  each  month  ;  but  they  were  selected  solely  by  reference  to  the  international 
lists,  being  the  five  days  of  highest  "  character  "  figures  in  each  month.  When,  as 
occasionally  happened,  there  was  a  possible  choice  between  two  or  more  days  for  the 
last  place  on  the  monthly  list  of  five,  the  criterion  applied  was  that  the  selected  days 
should,  if  possible,  be  consecutive.  I  had  had  occasion  some  years  ago,  before  the 
present  enquiry  was  even  thought  of,  to  select  the  five  most  disturbed  days  of  each 
month  of  the  years  1906  to  1909,  and  had  made  use  of  the  above  criterion.  There 
seemed  no  reason  to  discard  the  old  list,  or  to  follow  a  different  principle  when  dealing 
with  1910  and  1911.  My  experience  when  forming  the  first  list  had  led  me  to  regard 
five  as  a  happy  choice  for  the  monthly  total  of  disturbed  days.  A  considerably 
smaller  number,  such  as  one  or  two  a  month,  gave  too  few  days  to  eliminate 


AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM.  247 

accidental  features,  unless  a  much  larger  number  of  years  were  available.  On  the 
other  hand,  if  one  took  as  many  as  ten  days,  there  would  in  most  months  be  several 
days  competing  for  the  last  place  on  tin-  list,  and  during  magnetically  quiet  times 
m.iiiy  of  the  days  occurring  in  tin-  monthly  choice  would  have  represented  quiet 
rather  than  disturbed  conditions. 

The  present  p:i|»-r  is  not  confined  to  the  period  1906  to  1911,  but  utilises  as  well 
my  original  data  for  1890  to  1 900  for  the  investigation  of  various  points  not  considered 

inS.M. 

^ :;.  Tin-  first  step  was  to  make  sure  that  the  period  of  approximately  27-  days  was 
confirmed  by  the  international  "character"  figures  from  1906  to  1911.  The  mean 
results  obtained  for  the  individual  years  from  5  days  before  to  30  days  after  the 
representative  day  n  of  large  disturbance  are  given  in  Table  I.  The  entries  represent 
the  mean  international  "  character  "  figure  The  last  column  gives  for  comparison  the 
mean  "character"  figure  for  all  days  of  the  year.  In  the  case  of  1911,  December 
was  excluded,  so  as  to  keep  all  the  days  dealt  with  within  the  six  years.  The  results 
were  really  taken  out  to  three  decimal  places,  and  these  more  exact  values  were  used 
in  calculating  some  of  the  later  results  in  the  paper. 

§  4.  Before  discussing  the  main  question,  some  phenomena  in  Table  I.  call  for 
remark.  The  entries  in  column  n  and  the  means  from  all  days  show  but  little 
variation  from  year  to  year,  and  the  natural  inference  would  be  that  the  six  years 
were  almost  equally  disturbed.  The  phenomena,  however,  is  I  believe  largely  due  to 
another  cause.  The  international  data  are  published  quarterly.  Thus  the  man 
whose  duty  it  is  to  assign  "  character  "  figures  at  any  observatory  naturally  deals  with 
the  curves  of  not  more  than  three  months  at  a  time.  In  most  cases,  doubtless,  he 
has  a  desire  to  maintain  something  like  a  uniform  standard  ;  but  unless  his  verdict  is 
based  on  the  exact  measurement  of  some  definite  quantity,  such  as  the  daily  range, 
he  is  inevitably  much  influenced  by  the  accident  of  whether  the  months  he  is  dealing 
with  are  quiet  or  disturbed.  One  of  the  leading  objects  is  the  discrimination 
between  the  days  of  each  individual  month,  and  if  "  O's  "  are  given  to  nearly  all  the 
days  of  a  very  quiet  month,  there  is  no  adequate  discrimination.  The  natural 
tendency  is  thus  to  assign  a  "  1  "  in  quiet  months  to  days  which  in  highly-disturbed 
months  would  naturally  get  a  "0." 

§  5.  Another  point  to  bear  in  mind  is  that  highly  disturbed  conditions  are  seldom 
confined  to  a  single  day,  and  not  infrequently  extend  over  three  or  four  consecutive 
days  or  even  more.  Not  infrequently  three  or  even  four  of  the  five  most  disturbed 
days  of  the  month  were  consecutive.  In  February,  1907,  the  whole  five  were  con- 
secutive days,  and  in  March  and  April,  1910,  seven  of  the  ten  selected  disturbed 
days  were  consecutive.  This  explains  why  the  "  character"  figures  for  days  n—l  and 
n+1  in  Table  I.  invariably  are  next  in  magnitude  to  those  for  days  n.  But  the  next 
highest  figure,  it  will  be  seen,  occurs  on  day  n  +  26  (once),  n  +  27  (four  times),  or 
(once). 


L'4- 


DR.  C.  CHREE:  SOME  PHENOMENA  OF  SUNSPOTS 


TABLE  I.— Mean  "  Character  "  Figures  from  Selected  Disturbed  Days  and  from 

Previous  and  Subsequent  Days. 


Year. 

n-5.    n-4.    n-3.    n-2.    n-1. 

n. 

n+1.    n  +  2.    n  +  3.    n  +  4.    n  +  5. 

1906  .... 
1907        .     .     . 

0-63    0-56     0-59    0'66     0'92 
0-59     0-60    0-60    0-64     0'95 

1-31 
1-32 

0-99     0-63     0-55     0-57     0-58 
0-96     0-72     0-65     0-56     0-53 

1908  .... 

0-55     0-49    0-52     0'68     I'Ol 

1  34 

1-08     0-81     0-64     0-57     0-57 

1909  .... 

0-61     0-66     0-55     0-66     0-91 

1-32 

0-99     0-74     0-60     0'69     0-62 

1910        .     .     . 

0-66     0-64     0-66     0-77     0'97 

1-31 

1-04     0-90     0-84     0-81     0'73 

1911   .... 

0-67     0-58    0-53     0-64     0'95 

1-32 

1-07     0-83    0-70    0-71     0'72 

Mean    .    . 

0-62     0-59     0-57     0'67     0'95 

1-32 

1-02     0-77     0-66     0-65     0-63 

n  +  6.     n  +  7.      n  +  8.      n  +  9.    n  + 

10. 

n  + 

11.    m+12.    n  + 

13.    n+H.    Ti  +  15. 

1906  .... 

0-60      0-66       0-63       0'62     0-63 

o- 

58       0-60       0-67       0-69       0-61 

1907  .... 

0-57       0-57       0-59       0'62     0-56 

o- 

61       0-62       0-68       0-67       0-65 

1908  .... 

0-64       0-73       0-77       0-78     0-69 

o- 

58       0-54       0-53       0'49       0-51 

1909  .... 

0-55       0-56       0-53       0'50    0-51 

o- 

49       0-52       0-48       0'49       0-52 

1910  .... 

0-74      0-72       0-68       0-66     0'60 

o- 

65       0-71       0-72       0-68       0'68 

1911   .... 

0-66       0-67       0-61       0-56     0-57 

o- 

63       0-57       0-51       0-49       0'45 

Mean    .    . 

0-63      0-65       0-64       0-62     0'59 

o- 

59       0-59       0-60       0-59       0'57 

n+16.   n+17.    n+18.    n+19.  n  +  20. 

n+21.    n+22.    n  +  23.    n  +  24.    n+25. 

1906  .... 

0-65       0-68       0-65       0'69       0- 

68 

o- 

60       0-56       0-57       0-58       0'62 

1907  .... 

0-62       0-58       0-60      0'60      0- 

64 

o- 

64       0-65       0- 

61       0-59       0-65 

1908  .... 

0-55       0-67       0-73       0'72       0- 

63 

o- 

62       0-58       0- 

61       0-72       0-78 

1909  .... 

0-55       0-53       0-53       0'53       0- 

52 

o- 

58       0-68       0- 

73       0-65       0-51 

1910  .... 

0-70      0-68       0-67       0'65       0- 

69 

o- 

65       0-64       0- 

63       0-64       0-72 

1911   .... 

0-54       0-51       0-54       0-58       0- 

60 

o- 

68       0-65       0- 

60       0-56       0-63 

Mean    .     . 

0-60      0-61       0-62       0-63      0- 

63 

o- 

63       0-63       0- 

62       0-62       0-65 

n  +  26.         n  +  27.         n  +  28. 

Ti  +  29. 

n+  30. 

Mean  from  all  days. 

1906  . 

0-71             0-73             0-69 

0-67 

0-63 

0-65 

1907  .... 

0-72            0-77             0-72 

0-71 

0-75 

0-66 

1908  .... 

0-90            0-89            0-85 

0-70 

0-66 

0-68 

1909  .... 

0-55            0-73            0-75 

0-72 

0-69 

0-62 

1910  .... 

0-83            0-92            0-86 

0-85 

0-80 

0-72 

1911  .     .     .     . 

0-79            0-99             0-98 

0-83 

0-70 

0-65 

Mean    .     . 

0-75            0-84            0-81 

0-75 

0-70 

0-66 

AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM. 


24'J 


Taking  the  means  from  the  six  years,  the  mean  "character  "  figures  for  days  n  +  27 
and  n  +  28  considerably  exceed  all  others,  that  for  day  n  +  27  being  decidedly  the 
larger.  The  dost-  ivsrmlil.mrr  to  the  results  for  the  epoch  1890  to  1900  in  S.M.  will 
be  readily  recognised  on  consulting  fig.  1. 


o-5 


In  1890  to  1900  the  mean  character  figures  for  day  n,  for  day  n  +  27,  and  for  the 
mean  day  of  the  period  were  respectively  1'51,  0'94  and  070,  so  that  the  excess  of 
the  "  character  "  figure  for  day  n  +  27  over  that  for  the  average  day  was  30  per  cent, 
of  the  excess  for  day  n.  In  1906  to  1911  the  corresponding  percentage  is  27. 

It  is  unlikely  that  my  personal  standard  for  disturbance  when  assigning  "character" 
figures  to  the  days  of  1890  to  1900  agreed  with  that  of  the  international  list,  which 
represents  a  compromise  of  most  diverse  standards  from  some  forty  observatories. 
Thus  the  fact  that  the  mean  "  character  "  figure  for  the  selected  disturbed  days  of 
1906  to  1911  was  only  87  per  cent,  of  that  for  the  selected  disturbed  days  of  1890  to 
1900  does  not  necessarily  imply  that  the  second  epoch  was  the  quieter  of  the  two. 
Such,  however,  was  actually  the  case  on  the  whole,  though  no  year  of  the  later  period 
was  as  quiet  as  1900. 

The  two  curves  of  fig.  1  agree  in  showing  no  decided  trace  of  any  period  shorter 
than  27  days.  Other  points  of  resemblance  are  that  the  fall  subsequent  to  the 
maximum  during  days  n  +  28  to  71  +  30  is  decidedly  slower  than  the  rise  during  days 
n  +  25  to  n  +  27,  and  that  the  pulse  centering  about  day  /i  +  27  is  spread  over  more 
days  than  the  primary  pulse  centering  at  day  n.  The  latter  phenomenon  would 
obviously  tend  to  happen  if  the  period  had  not  always  the  same  length  but  oscillated 
slightly  about  a  mean  value. 

§  6.  With  a  view  to  following  up  this  last  idea,  I  took  from  the  selected  disturbed 
days  of  the  six  years  all  those  whose  "character"  figures  were  not  less  than  1'5,  the 

VOL.  CCXITI. — A.  2    K 


250  DR.  C.  CHREE:  SOME  PHENOMENA  OF  SUNSPOTS 

group  thus  representing  a  specially  high  grade  of  disturbance.  There  were  in  all  103 
,,f  tli.-sr  days,  the  annual  number  varying  from  15  in  1907  to  20  in  1906.  The 
following  were  the  mean  character  figures  found  for  the  primary  day  and  the 
subsequent  days  indicated  :— 


Day 

n. 

n  +  25. 

n  +  26. 

n  +  27. 

n  +  28. 

?!  +  29. 

«+30. 

"Character"  

1-683 

0-564 

0-689 

0-821 

0-871 

0-842 

0-748 

This  gives  a  period  if  anything  in  excess  of  28  days,  and  so  suggests  a  slight 
increase  in  the  length  of  the  27-day  period  as  the  intensity  of  the  primary  disturbance 
is  increased  ;  but  a  considerably  larger  number  of  days,  and  so  a  considerably  longer 
period  of  years,  would  be  required  to  establish  the  result. 

The  mean  "character"  figures  given  above  for  days  n  +  28  to  n  +  30  are  dis- 
tinctly larger  than  the  corresponding  figures  in  Table  I.,  but  the  excess  in  these 
days  is  relatively  less  than  that  on  day  n  itself.  Thus  the  excess  in  the 
"character"  figure  given  above  for  day  n  +  28  over  the  average  day  of  the 
six  years  (i.e.,  0'871  —  0'663  =  0'208)  is  only  20  per  cent,  of  the  excess  on  day 
n(l'683— 0'663  =  1'020),  while  the  corresponding  percentage  from  Table  I.  was  27. 

§  7.  If  individual  magnetic  storms  are  directly  due  to  individual  sunspots,  as 
various  writers  have  suggested,  it  is,  of  course,  a  natural  inference  that  when  the 
sun's  rotation  has  brought  a  spot  round  to  the  position  it  occupied  relative  to  the 
earth  when  a  magnetic  storm  occurred,  a  second  storm  will  be  experienced.  This 
seemingly  is  what  led  HARVEY  and  MAUNDER  independently  to  suggest  a  27^-day 
period  for  magnetic  storms. 

Our  previous  investigations  show  a  period  of  about  27  days,  which,  however,  is  not 
confined  to  what  are  usually  termed  "  magnetic  storms,"  but  belongs  equally  to 
moderate  disturbances,  which  are  frequent  events.  If,  then,  magnetic  storms  are  due 
to  sunspots,  equally  so  it  would  seem  must  be  the  minor  disturbances ;  and  if 
magnetic  storms  sometimes  recur,  as  Mr.  MAUNDER  and  the  Rev.  A.  L.  CORTIK 
believe,  at  several  reappearances  of  one  and  the  same  sunspot,  the  same  thing  is  to 
be  expected  of  minor  disturbances.  This  implies  that  "  character "  figures  should 
show  a  pulse  near  day  n  +  54,  as  well  as  near  day  n  +  27. 

This  conclusion,  however,  seems  a  natural  one  apart  from  all  theory.  The 
impression  left  on  my  own  mind  after  a  study  of  the  "  character  "  figures  was  that  a 
tendency  existed  for  the  magnetic  conditions,  whether  disturbed  or  not,  to  be  in  some 
way  related  to  or — as  biometricians  would  say — correlated  with  the  magnetic  conditions 
prevalent  27  days  earlier  or  kter.  Tbe  days  forming  columns  n  +  26  to  n  +  30  in 
Table  I.,  or  in  the  corresponding  table  for  the  years  1890  to  1900,  are  disturbed 
sensibly  more  than  the  average  day,  and  we  should  thus  expect  more  than  average 
disturbance  on  days  n  +  53  to  »  +  57,  with  a  culmination  about  days  n  +  54  and  n  +  55, 


AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM. 


251 


as  the  period  seems  in  excess  of  27  days.  As  the  expected  effect  appeared  likely  to 
be  small,  it  seemed  best  to  utilise  the  data  from  the  longer  period  of  years  1890  to 
1900.  Calculations  in  that  case  had  previously  extended  to  day  n  +  35,  and  they 
were  now  extended  to  day  n  +  60.  "  Character"  figures  were  assigned  to  the  earlier 
days  of  1901,  so  as  to  utilise  all  the  660  selected  disturbed  days  of  the  11  years. 
The  mean  "character"  figure  from  all  days  of  the  11  years  was  070.  The  mean 
"  character"  figures  up  to  day  n  +  35  are  given  in  S.M.  (Table  XL,  p.  101) ;  those  for 
days  7i  +  36  to  n  +  60  are  given  in  Table  II. 

TABLE  II. — Mean  "  Character"  Figures  for  Days  n  +  36  to  n  +  60,  n  being  the 
Eepresentative  Disturbed  Day  of  the  11  Years  1890  to  1900. 


Day  .... 

n  +  36. 

n  +  37. 

n  +  38. 

n+39. 

n  +  40. 

n  +  4I. 

»  +  42. 

n  +  43. 

"Character"    . 

0-63 

0-68 

0-68 

0-66 

0-66 

0-63 

0-64 

0-66 

Day  .... 

n  +  44. 

n  +  45. 

n  +  46. 

n  +  47. 

n  +  48. 

n  +  49. 

n  +  50. 

n  +  51. 

"Character"   . 

0-65 

0-66 

0-67 

0-64 

0-64 

0-66 

0-63 

0-65 

i>»y  

n  +  52. 

n  +  53. 

n  +  54. 

n  +  55. 

»  +  56.      n  +  57.      n  +  58.      n  +  59.      n  +  60. 

"Character"   . 

0-72 

0-78 

0-84 

0  85 

0-81         0-76         0-71          0-68         0-64 

As  shown  in  S.M.  (Table  XI.),  the  "  character"  figure  lay  between  0'61  and  0'66 
from  day  n  +  5  to  day  n  +  24,  and  exceeded  070  only  from  days  n— 2  to  n+3,  and 
days  ?i  +  25  to  n+31.  There  is  thus  clear  evidence  in  Table  II.  of  a  pulse  from  day 
n  +  52  to  day  n  +  58,  or  possibly  n+  59.  The  figures  for  days  n  +  54  and  n  +  55  distinctly 
overtop  their  neighbours,  that  for  day  n  +  55  being  slightly  the  higher. 

§  8.  Reasoning  in  the  same  way  as  before,  we  should  now  expect  an  excess  in  the 
"  character"  figures  for  days  n  +  79  to  n  +  84,  and  so  on.  It  will  probably  have  been 
realised  ere  this  that  carrying  the  investigation  up  to  day  n+60  entailed  exceedingly 
heavy  arithmetical  labour,  and,  as  the  time  at  my  disposal  was  limited,  it  was 
important  to  economise  effort.  It  was  anticipated  that  the  successive  pulses  would 
diminish  rapidly  in  .magnitude,  and  that  they  would  spread  themselves  over  an 
increasing  number  of  days,  so  that  the  distinction  from  neighbouring  days  would  be 
more  and  more  difficult  to  establish.  Further,  there  is  the  possibility  that  normal 
conditions  at  the  time,  which  includes  days  which  follow  the  selected  disturl>ed  days 
after  a  long  interval,  may  differ  sensibly  from  normal  conditions  answering  to  the 
selected  days  themselves. 

2  K  2 


.J5._,  DR.  C.  CHREE:  SOME   PHENOMENA   OF  SUNSPOTS 

Eventually  a  practical  and  economical  plan  suggested  itself.  Before  adopting  it  I 
had  assured  myself  that  the  27-day  phenomenon  applied  to  quiet  days.  It  then 
became  clear  that  if  one  selected  5  quiet  days  for  each  month,  and  considered  the 
days  which  followed  them  after  any  given  interval,  as  well  as  the  days  following  the 
selected  disturbed  days  after  the  same  interval,  it  was  necessary  to  consider  only  a 
comparatively  few  consecutive  days  near  the  date  when  the  pulse  was  expected  to 
appear.  For  instance,  days  from  79  to  84  days  subsequent  to  the  5  selected 
disturbed  days  of  January,  1906,  are  practically  contemporaneous  with  days  from  79 
to  84  days  subsequent  to  the  5  selected  quiet  days  of  the  same  month.  If  there  is  an 
appreciable  pulse  with  crest  (or  hollow)  about  81  days  subsequent  to  the  represen- 
tative disturbed  or  quiet  days,  this  will  be  rendered  manifest  by  the  differences 
between  the  two  sets  of  subsequent  days,  irrespective  of  what  the  appropriate 
average  character  figure  from  all  days  might  be. 

By  this  time  I  had  also  discovered  that  the  27-day  period  is  as  clearly  recognisable 
in  days  which  precede  as  in  those  which  follow  selected  disturbed  days.  It  was  thus 
decided  to  consider  days  before  as  well  as  days  after  the  selected  days,  and  to  go 
equally  far  in  both  directions.  It  was  also  decided  to  take  the  later  period,  1906  to 
1911,  so  as  to  have  an  international  basis  for  the  selected  days,  whether  quiet  or 
disturbed.  The  quiet  days  were  those  actually  selected  at  de  Bilt. 

The  final  mean  results  of  the  investigation  are  given  in  Table  III.,  p.  254,  and  are 
shown  graphically  in  fig.  2.  But  for  considerations  of  time,  it  would  have  been  desirable 
to  take  more  than  six  days  near  the  epochs  where  the  pulses  were  expected. 

The  columns  headed  D  and  Q  respectively  in  Table  III.,  refer  to  the  days  associated 
with  the  selected  disturbed  days  and  to  those  associated  with  the  selected  quiet  days. 
The  number  of  selected  days  used  was  always  the  same  for  the  disturbed  and  the 
quiet  days,  but  varied,  as  shown  in  the  second  line,  because  only  parts  of  the  first 
and  last  years  of  the  series  could  be  utilised.  For  example,  when  dealing  with  the 
days  which  were  from  84  to  79  days  prior  to  selected  days,  April  1906  was  the 
earliest  month  whose  selected  days  one  could  employ.  For  that  particular  quest  the 
15  selected  days  of  the  first  3  months  of  1906  had  to  be  omitted,  leaving  only  345 
selected  days.  Similarly,  as  no  data  subsequent  to  December  1911  were  to  be  used, 
the  last  15  selected  days  of  1911  had  to  be  omitted  when  dealing  with  the  days 
79  to  84  days  subsequent  to  selected  days.  January  1,  1906,  was  a  selected  quiet 
day,  and  December  31,  1911,  a  selected  disturbed  day.  Thus  the  earliest  and  the 
latest  of  the  selected  days,  both  quiet  and  disturbed,  were  omitted  from  the  central 
group  of  days  n-3  to  n+3,  leaving  358  available. 

The  "character"  figures  in  the  third  line   of  Table  III.  relate   to   the   periods 

covered  by  the  corresponding  selected  days.     Thus  0'659  given  for  the  group  of  days 

84  to  n-79  is  the  mean  for  the  period  commencing  April  1,  1906,  and  ending 

In  some  ways  it  would  have  been  better  to  have  replaced  this 

by  a  mean  applicable  to  the  period  containing  the  days  which  preceded  the  selected 


AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM. 


253 


days  by  an  interval  of  from  84  to  79  days,  but  complications  would  have  ensued, 
tacause  a  day  80  days,  for  instance,  prior  to  a  selected  April  day  may  fall  in  January 
or  in  February. 

A  general  idea  of  the  phenomena  disclosed  by  Table  III.  will  be  most  easily 
grasped  by  consulting  fig.  2.  The  central  vertical  line  in  the  figure  applies  to  the 
representative  days,  disturbed  and  quiet.  Abscissae,  measured  from  this  line,  represent 
the  interval  in  days  from  the  representative  day,  time  previous  being  measured  to 


+  0-5 

+0-5 

ta 

• 

27 

• 

8280 
84  •'» 

/111 

£2       r 

h 

3   -A  -A     r 

LJB.            Last            f  &* 

\f    Normal 
81 

V     "V 

3                    *                             .    i      Normal  „, 
25  i                     52    •' 

9    !                              o    ^                              ^ 

•                            If                       5 

!    i                                \l 

55                        K 

1  ^                                V 
1  • 

27 

I/                           5* 

27 

i 


-0-5 


6 

Fig.  2. 

the  left,  and  time  subsequent  to  the  right.  The  numeral  attached  to  any  particular 
point  on  a  curve  signifies  the  interval  in  days  from  the  representative  day,  whether 
previous  or  subsequent.  The  ordinate  represents  the  algebraic  excess  of  the 
"  character  "  figure  over  the  corresponding  normal  "  character "  figure  in  the  third 
line  of  Table  III. 

The  representative  disturbed  day  had  a  "character"  1'321.  Its  excess,  0'664, 
over  the  corresponding  normal  value  (0'657)  is  represented  by  the  positive  ordinate 
marked  0.  The  representative  quiet  day,  on  the  other  hand,  had  a  "character"  of 


254 


DR.  C.  CHREE:  SOME  PHENOMENA   OF  SUNSPOTS 


TABLE  III.—"  Character  "  Figures  on  Specified  Days  preceding  or  following 
Selected  Disturbed  and  Quiet  Days  n,  of  Years  1906  to  1911. 


Days    .    .    . 

it  -  84  to  ft  -  79. 

it  -  57  to  n  - 

52. 

71  - 

30  to  n  -  25. 

7t-3  to 

u  +  3. 

Number  of  ~| 
disturbed  or  I 
quiet  days    j 
used       J 

345 

350 

355 

358 

Mean       ~j 
"character"  1 
from  all  days  f 
of  period.    J 

0-659 

0-660 

0-663 

0-657 

•W— 

"  Character." 

Day. 

"  Character." 

Day. 

"  Character." 

"Character." 
Dav 

uay.    - 

D. 

Q. 

D. 

Q. 

D. 

Q. 

D. 

Q- 

n-84   ( 
«-83   1 
n-82   1 

n-80   1 
n-79   1 

3-704 
3-705 
3-718 
3-718 
3-719 
3-702 

0-655 
0-662 
0-627 
0  606 
0-632 
0-646 

n-  57 
7t-56 
ft-55 
n-54 
«  -53 
n  -52 

0-701   l 
0-716  ( 
0-753 
0-784 
0-755  l 
0-729 

3-638 
3-599 
3-547 
3-579 
3-611 
3-637 

71  -3( 

7i  -  2£ 
n-Vi 

71-21 

n-2f. 

1   0-647 
1   0-677 
(  0-783 
0-836 
.   0-813 
>  0-754 

0-626 
0-584 
0-566 
0-515 
0-561 
0-660 

n-3    0-572 
7i-2    0-667 
n-1    0-949 
n       1-321 
7t+l     1-016 
7i  +  2    0-767 
n  +  3    0-659 

0-661 
0-543 
0-347 
0-135 

0-409 
0-664 
0-746 

Days    .     .    . 

71  +  25  to  n  +  30. 

Ti  +  52  to  7i  +  57. 

Ti  +  79  to  T!  +84. 

Number  of  "j 
disturbed  or  1 
quiet  days    f 
used       J 

355 

350 

345 

Mean       ~| 
"character"  1 
from  all  days  f 
of  period.    J 

0-663 

0-666 

0-667 

Day. 

"Character." 

Day. 

"  Character." 

Day. 

"  Character." 

D.             Q. 

D. 

Q. 

D. 

Q. 

n  +  25 
n  +  26 
n  +  27 
»  +  28 
n  +  29 
n  +  30 

0-662       0-591 
0-748       0-490 
0-830       0-486 
0-806       0-535 
0-746       0-614 
0-704       0-661 

n  +  52 

n  +  54 
Ti  +  55 

tt  +  57 

0-683 
0-732 
0-776 
0-767 
0-735 
0-697 

0-593 
0-551 
0-527 
0-570 
0-600 
0-649 

w  +  79        0-662 
7i  +  80        0-692 
7i  +  81        0-717 
7i  +  82        0  •  718 
n+83        0-706 
7i  +  84        0-706 

0-614 
0-599 
0-602 
0-602 
0-589 
0-638 

AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM.  255 

only  0'135,  and  its  deficiency,  0'522,  is  represented  by  the  negative  ordinate 
marked  0.  The  algebraic  difference  of  these  ordinates,  T186,  represents  the  difference 
in  "  character  "  between  the  representative  disturbed  and  quiet  days. 

It  will  be  seen  that  the  day  which  is  three  days  prior  to  the  representative 
disturbed  day  is  decidedly  quieter  than  normal,  and  is  less  disturbed  than  the  day 
which  precedes  by  three  days  the  representative  quiet  day.  On  the  other  hand, 
the  day  which  is  three  days  subsequent  to  the  representative  quiet  day  is  decidedly 
more  disturbed  than  normal,  and  is  less  quiet  than  the  day  which  is  three  days 
sulwequent  to  the  representative  disturbed  day.  The  latter  result  especially  was 
quite  unexpected,  in  view  of  the  frequent  occurrences  of  sequences  of  disturbed  days, 
and  still  more  of  quiet  days.  A  sequence  of  five,  or  even  ten,  successive  O's  in  the 
returns  from  an  individual  observatory  is  not  unusual  in  months  of  minor  disturbance. 
The  natural  inference  is  that  the  proverb  "  the  calm  precedes  the  storm  "  has  some 
claim  to  recognition  even  in  terrestrial  magnetism. 

It  may  create  surprise  that  the  representative  quiet  day  had  so  large  a  "  character" 
figure  as  0'135.  Days,  however,  of  international  "character"  O'O  are  very  rare. 
There  were  only  four,  for  instance,  during  1906.  The  phenomenon  is  considerably 
due  to  a  few  observatories  where  O's  are  assigned  to  only  exceptionally  quiet  days. 
On  the  other  hand,  if  latitudes  over  55  degrees  were  adequately  represented,  0'0's 
would  be  still  rarer. 

A  glance  at  fig.  2  will  show  that  the  27-day  period  is  just  as  prominent  for  quiet 
as  for  disturbed  characteristics,  and  that  it  can  be  traced  backwards  as  readily  as 
forwards.  The  corresponding  patches  of  curve  associated  respectively  with  the 
disturbed  and  the  quiet  days,  as  it  were,  repel  one  another.  This  would  probably 
serve  to  prove  the  existence  of  pulses  considerably  beyond  the  range  covered  by 
Table  III.  and  fig.  2. 

§  9.  One  of  the  principal  objects  originally  in  view  was  to  obtain  a  more  exact 
estimate  of  the  length  of  the  period  by  measuring  the  interval  in  days  between  the 
crests  of  pulses  remote  from  one  another.  But  even  in  the  79-  to  84-days'  pulses — 
i.e.,  the  third  subsequent  pulses — the  difference  between  the  ordinates  answering  to 
successive  days  has  become  very  small,  so  that  trifling  accidental  irregularities  are 
prejudicial  to  accurate  time  deductions.  This  difficulty  will  naturally  tend  to 
disappear  as  the  number  of  years  for  which  international  data  are  available  increases, 
and  the  power  of  the  method  will  thus  continually  develop. 

In  §  6,  it  will  be  remembered,  we  obtained  a  result  which  suggested  that  the  length 
of  the  period  increased  with  the  amplitude  of  the  selected  disturbance.  If,  however, 
this  were  the  case,  one  would  expect  the  interval  between  successive  subsequent 
pulses  associated  with  the  selected  disturbed  days  to  gradually  diminish,  and  the 
intervals  derived  from  pulses  associated  with  quiet  days  to  be  shorter  than  those  from 
pulses  associated  with  disturbed  days.  These  tendencies  are  not  apparent  in  fig.  2. 

§  10.  The  fact  that  the  rise  in  the  "  character  "  figure  in  the  two  days  immediately 


._,5(;  DR.  C.  CHREE:  SOME  PHENOMENA   OF  SUNSPOTS 

preceding  the  representative  disturbed  day  exceeds  the  fall  in  the  two  immediately 
following  days  has  been  already  noticed.  This  peculiarity  is  a  prominent  feature  in 
all  the  associated  pulses  in  fig.  2,  except  the  third  previous,  where  the  exact  day  of 
incidence  of  the  maximum  is  not  clearly  indicated.  In  the  case  of  the  selected  quiet 
days,  on  the  other  hand,  the  fall  in  the  "  character"  figure  in  the  two  immediately 
preceding  days  is  less  rapid  than  the  rise  in  the  two  immediately  succeeding  days, 
and  the  same  peculiarity  is  reproduced  in  the  first  previous  and  the  first  and  second 
subsequent  pulses.  The  second  previous  pulse  shows  the  opposite  phenomenon,  but 
this  may  arise  from  the  same  disturbing  cause  which  has  brought  the  maximum  to 
day  —55  instead  of  day  —54.  In  the  third  previous  and  third  subsequent  pulses  the 
shape  of  the  curve  is  irregular. 

Speaking  generally,  in  the  case  both  of  the  disturbed  and  the  quiet  days,  while 
corresponding  pulses  respectively  to  right  and  left  of  the  central  line  00  are  very 
similar,  the  curves  are  not  images  of  one  another  with  respect  to  00.  The  character 
of  the  primary  (i.e.,  central)  pulse  seems  to  be  impressed  on  the  associated  pulses 
which  precede  it,  as  well  as  on  those  which  follow  it. 

The  curves  for  days  —30  to  —25  and  for  days  +25  to  +30  will  have  a  much  closer 
fit  if  we  cut  the  paper  along  the  line  00,  and  bring  the  lines  answering  to  days  —27 
and  +27  over  one  another  by  sliding  the  one  half  sheet  over  the  other,  than  if  we 
effect  this  superposition  by  folding  the  paper  about  the  line  00. 

If  the  curves  had  been  images  of  one  another,  by  adding  "  character  "  figures  for 
days  n+m  and  n— m — where  n  denotes  the  representative  disturbed  or  quiet  day — 
we  might  have  got  as  smooth  results  for  day  m  as  if  we  had  been  able  to  use  12  years' 
data  while  confirming  ourselves  to  days  following  the  selected  days.  The  want  of 
symmetry  makes  the  conditions  somewhat  less  favourable  for  evaluating  the  length 
of  the  period,  supposing  that  not  to  be  an  exact  number  of  days.  The  maxima  at 
days  —54,  —27  and  +27  in  the  associated  disturbed  pulses  are  sufficiently  prominent 
to  fairly  justify  the  view  that  the  true  maxima  lie  within  half  a  day  of  the  apparent 
maxima.  This  gives  for  the  time  of  three  periods  81  ±1  days,  or  for  one  period 
27  ±0'3. 

The  ordinates  answering  to  days  +54  and  +55  differ  but  little,  while  those  for 
days  +81  and  +82  are  practically  equal.  Thus  the  values  deduced  for  the  period 
from  these  summits  and  that  at  day  -54  are  respectively  108'5/4,  and  135'5/5  days, 
or  both  approximately  271  days. 

On  the  curves  associated  with  the  selected  quiet  days,  the  maxima  at  days  -81, 
27,  and  +54  are  the  clearest.     From-81  and  +54  we  get  27'0,  and  from  -55 
and  +  54  we  get  27*25  days. 

The  associated  disturbed  curve  for  days  -30  to  -25  and  the  associated  quiet  curve 
for  days  +25  to  +30  both  suggest  slightly  under  27  days  for  the  period. 

11.  If  instead  of  treating  the  "character"  figures  from  the  disturbed  and  the 
quiet  associated  days  separately,  we  combine  them,  we  obtain  results  of  much  greater 


ANI>   OF  TKKi;l-:sTi;lAL    MAGNKTISM 


257 


symmetry.  This  has  been  done  in  Table  IV.,  the  entries  in  which  represent  the 
differences  of  corresponding  D  and  Q  results  in  Table  III.  To  save  decimals,  the 
results  are  expressed  in  terms  of  O'OOl  "character"  unit  as  unit.  As  day  0— 
i.e.,  what  is  called  day  n  in  Table  III. — is  neither  previous  nor  subsequent,  but 
fundamental  for  both  previous  and  subsequent  days,  it  appears  in  both  the  first  and 
second  lines  of  Table  IV.  The  entry  1186  ascribed  to  it  represents  of  course 
( 1 '321 -0*135)  x  1000.  The  algebraic  sign  when  omitted  is  plus.  The  "character" 
figure  for  the  associated  disturbed  day  was  invariably  the  larger,  except  for  the  third 
days  before  and  after  (he  selected  days. 

TABLE  IV. — Differences  Disturbed  less  Quiet  Associated  Days  (Unit  =  O'OOl  of 

"Character  "Unit). 


0. 

1. 

2. 

3. 

25. 

26. 

27. 

28. 

29. 

30. 

Previous  .  . 
Subsequent  .  . 

Sum  .... 

1186 
1186 

602 
607 

124 
103 

-  89 
-  87 

94 
61 

252 

258 

321 
353 

217 
271 

93 
132 

21 
43 

2372 

1209 

227 

-176 

155 

510 

674 

488 

225 

64 

52.   53. 

54. 

55. 

56.   57. 

79. 

80. 

81. 

82. 

83. 

84. 

Previous  .  . 
Subsequent  .  . 

Sum  .  .  .  . 

92   144 

90   181 

205 
249 

206 

197 

117   63 
135   48 

56 

48 

87 
93 

112 
115 

91 
116 

43 
117 

49 
68 

117 

182   325 

454 

403 

252   111 

104 

180 

227 

207 

160 

The  accordance  between  the  results  for  the  previous  and  the  subsequent  days 
1,  2,  and  3  in  Table  IV.  is  quite  extraordinarily  close.  In  other  words,  the  primary 
pulse  obtained  by  taking  the  excess  of  "  character  "  figures  for  selected  disturbed 
and  adjacent  days  over  the  corresponding  figures  for  selected  quiet  and  adjacent  days 
is  almost  perfectly  symmetrical  as  between  time  previous  and  time  subsequent.  We 
cannot  hope  to  see  equal  symmetry  in  the  associated  pulses,  whose  form  is  necessarily 
more  dependent  on  accident,  but  there  is  at  least  no  marked  a-symmetry  in  the  second 
and  third  associated  pulses.  If  curves  were  drawn  to  represent  these,  they  would 
not  be  markedly  steeper  on  one  side  of  the  maximum  than  the  other.  This  suggests 
adding  the  two  sets  of  results,  as  has  been  done  in  the  last  line  of  Table  IV.,  and 
applying  the  sums  to  the  evaluation  of  the  period.  The  most  orthodox  way  probably 
would  be  to  fit  an  algebraic  curve  to  each  of  the  successive  sets  of  figures,  and 
calculate  the  abscissa  of  its  maximum  ordinate.  But  as  there  is  nothing  to  guide  one 
as  to  what  the  theoretical  shape  of  such  a  curve  should  be,  rougher  methods  may  not 

VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  2  L 


25R  DR.  C.  CHKKK:   SOME  PHKNO.MKNA   OF  SUNSPOTS 

,,,,lik,-ly  be  iiuite  as  satisfactory.  As  an  example  of  the  methods  actually  used,  take 
tin-  data  f..r  days  52  to  57  in  Table  IV.  The  maximum  obviously  comes  between 
days  54  and  55,  say  at  54+ a1.  Assume  the  slopes  from  the  maximum  down  to  days 
;,1  and  55  to  be  the  same,  and  to  be  the  arithmetic  means  of  the  slopes  from  days 
:>:!  and  54  (129  per  diem),  and  from  days  55  to  56  (151  per  diem). 

Then  we  have 

454  +  140Z  =  403  +  140  (1-x) 

or 

x  =  0'318. 

Thus  twice  the  period  is  54 '3 18  days,  i.e.,  the  period  is  27 '16  days. 

If  we  take  the  same  days,  but  assume  the  slope  on  the  two  sides  of  the  maximum 
to  Ixj  the  mean  of  those  from  days  52  to  54  and  from  days  55  to  57,  the  only  difference 
is  that  we  replace  140  in  the  above  calculation  by  141,  and  again  find  for  the  single 
period  27' 16  days. 

Treating  the  data  for  days  79  to  84  in  the  same  way,  taking  first  the  arithmetic 
mean  of  the  slopes  from  days  80  to  81  and  82  to  83,  and  then  the  arithmetic  mean  of 
the  slopes  from  days  79  to  81  and  82  to  84,  we  get  as  estimates  for  the  triple  period 
81*29  and  81*31  days,  both  giving  2710  days  for  the  single  period. 

§  12.  An  inspection  of  fig.  2  suffices  to  show  that  the  ratio  borne  by  the  maximum 
ordinate  of  the  first  associated  pulse — whether  for  disturbed  or  quiet  days — to  the 
maximum  ordinate  of  the  primary  pulse  is  notably  less  than  the  ratio  borne  by  the 
maximum  ordinate  of  the  second  associated  pulse  to  that  of  the  first.  These  ratios 
and  those  between  the  maximum  ordinates  of  the  several  associated  pulses  are  fairly 
alike,  whether  we  take  subsequent  or  previous  days,  and  whether  we  take  disturbed 
or  quiet  days.  Thus  the  most  accurate  information  on  the  subject  is  probably  that 
derivable  from  the  data  in  the  last  line  of  Table  IV.  The  ratios  between  the  successive 
maximum  ordinates  deduced  from  the  data  in  question  are  as  follows : — 


Primary. 

First  associated.       Second  associated. 

Third  associated. 

1              : 

0-284            1  :         0-191 

:          0-096 

The  maximum  ordinates  of  the  first,  second,  and  third  associated  pulses  stand  to 
one  another  almost  exactly  in  the  ratio  3:2:1.  It  is  easily  seen  in  fact  in  fig.  2 
that  the  summits  of  corresponding  first,  second,  and  third  associated  pulses  lie  nearly 
on  straight  lines,  which,  if  produced,  would  cut  the  zero  line  at  points  answering 
roughly  to  days  ±110.  This  linearity  in  the  summits  cannot  well  represent  the  true 
phenomenon  exactly,  because  it  would  imply  that  no  finite  associated  pulse  existed 
except  those  shown  in  fig.  2,  whereas  there  can  be  but  little  doubt  that  if  data  existed 
for  a  really  long  series  of  years,  pulses  could  be  recognised  considerably  beyond  the 


AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL    MAGNETISM 


259 


range  of  the  figure.  At  first  sight,  one  might  have  expected  to  find  the  maximum 
on  [mates  in  successive  pulses  decreasing  after  an  exponential  law.  But  two  things 
have  to  be  remembered.  First,  the  breadth  of  successive  pulses  increases  as  the  height 
diminishes,  representing  a  distribution  of  energy  over  a  greater  and  greater  numl>er 
of  days  ;  and  secondly,  as  has  been  already  remarked,  the  true  maxima  do  not 
seemingly  fall  on  exact  days,  so  that  the  true  maxima  are  not  available.  We  should, 
for  instance,  accepting  the  figures  in  Table  IV.,  put  the  true  maximum  for  the  second 
associated  pulse  between  days  54  and  55,  and  the  numerical  value  corresponding 
would  thus  naturally  be  in  excess  of  454,  the  value  found  for  day  54.  A  similar 
remark  applies  to  the  other  associated  pulses,  so  that  the  ratios  given  above  are  at 
best  only  approximations  to  the  truth. 

§  13.  Evidence  that  the  results  of  §§  8  to  12  are  not  confined  to  the  period  1906  to 
1911,  nor  due  to  any  peculiarity  in  international  "  character  "  data,  was  derived  from 
a  study  of  data  for  1890  to  1900.  The  results  of  this  investigation  are  summarised  in 
Table  V.  They  were  derived  from  days  associated  with  disturbed  days.  Only  the 

TABLE  V. — Primary  Disturbance  Pulse  and  Associated  Pulses,  Years  1890  to  1900. 

(Unit  =  O'OOl  "  Character"  Unit.) 


Day  .  .  . 

-30. 

-29. 

-  28.  -  27.  -  26. 

-25. 

-3. 

-2.   -1. 

0. 

+  1.   +2.   +3. 

> 

33 

105 

197   262   202 

89 

-56 

76   348 

812 

411   167   77 

Day  .  .  . 

+  25. 

+  20. 

+  27.  +28.  +29. 

+  30. 

+  53. 

+  54. 

+  55. 

+  56.    +57. 

11 

129 

242   223   145 

95 

85 

142 

148 

114     62 

Day  .  .  . 

+  80. 

+  81 

.   +  82.   +  83. 

+  84. 

+  107. 
56 

+  108. 

+  109. 

+  110.   +111. 

64 

91 

94    50 

35 

39 

71 

105     67 

first  previous  pulse  was  considered,  but  the  investigation  extended  to  the  fourth 
associated  subsequent  pulse.  The  entries  in  the  table  are  the  excesses  of  the  mean 
"character"  figures  for  the  days  stated  over  the  normal  figure  0'G97  derived  from 
all  days  of  the  11  years.  To  avoid  decimals  the  unit  employed  is  O'OOl  of  the 
"  character  "  unit,  as  in  Table  IV.  The  associated  disturl>ed  day  had  a  "  character  " 
figure  in  excess  of  the  normal,  except  in  the  one  case  in  which  a  negative  sign  appears 
in  the  table.  The  representative  disturbed  day  is  descril>ed  as  day  0,  as  in  Table  IV. 
The  maximum  for  each  pulse  is  in  heavy  type. 

Uncertainties  arising  from  variations  in  the  normal  "  character  "  figure  appropriate 

2  L  2 


•v.,, 


Dl{.  C.  CHfcEE:  SOME  PHENOMENA  OF  StJNSPOTS 


at  timrs  corresponding  to  the  several  groups  of  subsequent  days,  naturally  become 
less  the  longer  the  period  of  years  dealt  with.  The  fact  that  the  commencing  months 
of  both  1890  and  1901  were  all  very  quiet  is  also  to  the  advantage  of  the  11 -year 
group,  as  compared  with  the  6-year  group.  Still,  I  should  have  preferred,  but  for 
considerations  of  time,  to  have  included  quiet  as  well  as  disturbed  day  data  for  the 
1 1  years,  employing  the  Astronomer  Royal's  quiet  days  for  the  former. 

The  data  for  the  previous  associated  pulse,  and  the  first,  second,  and  third 
subsequent  associated  pulses  in  Table  V.  are  very  fairly  smooth  ;  but  those  for  the 
fourth  associated  subsequent  pulse  seem  unduly  affected  by  "  accidental "  phenomena, 
which  depress  the  entry  for  day  108  and  raise  that  for  day  110.  The  eleven  years 
were  dealt  with  in  four  groups— 

(A)  Surispot  minimum  years,  1890,  1899,  and  1900; 

(B)  Sunspot  maximum  years,  1892,  1893,  and  1894  ; 

(C)  Highly  disturbed  years,  1891,  1895,  and  1896  ; 

(D)  Other  years,  1897  and  1898. 

The  largest  "  character  "  figure  for  the  five  days  107  to  111  occurred  on  day  111 
in  group  (A)  and  day  110  in  group  (B),  but  on  day  107  in  groups  (C)  and  (D)  ;  while 
the  lowest  figure  occurred  on  day  108  in  group  (A),  and  on  day  111  in  groups  (C) 
and  (D).  Considering  this  variability,  much  weight  cannot  be  attached  to  details  in 
the  results  for  the  fourth  associated  subsequent  pulse.  The  fact,  however,  that  the 
figures  for  all  five  days  107  to  111  are  so  decidedly  in  excess  of  the  normal  seems 
clear  evidence  that  this  pulse  is  by  no  means  negligible. 

The  primary  pulse  in  Table  V.  shows  the  two  characteristics  noted  in  the  discussion 
of  fig.  2.  The  third  day  prior  to  the  representative  disturbed  day  is  decidedly  quieter 
than  the  average  day.  The  rise  to  the  maximum  in  the  primary  pulse  is  considerably 
more  rapid  than  the  subsequent  fall.  This  a-symmetry  is  also  clearly  shown  by  the 
first  and  second  associated  subsequent  pulses. 

The  ratio  borne  by  the  excess  of  the  maximum  "  character  "  figure  for  the  primary 
pulse  over  the  normal  to  the  corresponding  excesses  for  the  associated  pulses  are  as 
follows : — 


Primary  pulse. 


First  associated. 


Previous. 


0-323 


Subsequent. 


Second  associated 
subsequent. 


Third  associated 
subsequent. 


0-298 


0-310 


0-182 


0-11C 


These  ratios  are  fairly  similar  to  those  derived  in  §  12  from  the  combined  disturbed 
and  quiet  day  data  of  the  6-year  period.     In  the  present  case,  however,  we  have 


AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM. 


261 


very  nearly  for  the  ratios  of  the  amplitudes   of  the    three   associated    subsequent 

pulses : — 

First :  Second  :  Third  : :  1  :  0'62  :  (0'62)8. 

Thus  the  amplitudes  of  the  successive  associated  pulses  do,  in  this  instance,  decrease 
nearly  in  geometrical  progression.  At  this  rate  we  should  have  had  the  amplitude  of 
the  fourth  associatx-d  subsequent  pulse  in  Table  V.  about  GO. 

The  remarks  made  on  the  sources  of  uncertainty  affecting  corresponding  data  in 
§  12  apply  here  equally. 

§  14.  It  seemed  desirable  to  make  sure  that  no  period  shorter  than  27  days  was 
indicated  by  days  previous  to  the  selected  disturbed  days.  Mean  "character" 
figures  were  accordingly  calculated  for  all  days  up  to  the  35th  prior  to  the  selected 
disturbed  days  of  the  11  years  1890  and  1900.  The  "character"  figures  thus 
deduced  appear  in  the  first  line  of  Table  VI.  The  second  line  supplies  for  comparison 


TARLE  VI. — "  Character  "  Figures  on  Previous  and  Subsequent  Days  associated 
with  the  Selected  Disturbed  Days  of  the  11  years  1890  to  1900. 


1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7.    8. 

9. 

10. 

Previous  -days  •    ... 

1-05 

0'77 

0-64 

0-61 

0-63 

0-61 

0-60  0-59 

0-61 

0-62 

Subsequent  days  .... 

1-11 

0-86 

0-77 

0-70 

0-66 

0-62 

0-63  0-64 

0-62 

0-61 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17.   18. 

19. 

20. 

Previous  days  

0-63 

0-64 

0-67 

0-67 

0-65 

0-63 

0-63  0-65 

0-64 

0-62 

Subsequent  days  .... 

0-63 

0-63 

0-63 

0-64 

0-63 

0-63 

0-63  0-61 

0-61 

0-62 

21. 

22. 

23. 

24. 

25. 

26. 

27.   28. 

29. 

30. 

Previous  days  

0-64 

0-69 

0-68 

0-72 

0-79 

0-90 

0-96  0  89 

0-80 

0-73 

Subsequent  days  .... 

0-64 

0-64 

0-63 

0-65 

0-71 

0-83 

0  94  0-92 

0  84 

0-79 

31. 

32. 

3 

3. 

34. 

35. 

Previous  days  
Subsequent  days  .... 

0-64 
0  72 

0-67 
0-70 

o- 
o- 

63 
67 

0-63 
0-64 

0-59 
0-61 

the  corresponding  figures  for  the  35  days  subsequent  to  the  selected  disturbed  days, 
as  given  in  S.M.  The  "character"  of  the  representative  disturbed  day  was  1'51. 
Figures  in  excess  of  the  normal  value  0'70  are  in  heavy  type. 


2g2  1,1;.  <•.  rmiKE:  SOME   PHENOMENA  OF  SUNSPOTS 

Tl  „•.•••  is  .1  faint  suggestion  of  a  period  of  about  13£  days,  but  if  it  exists  its 
amplitude  is  very  small. 

'I'll,,  tirst  subsequent  pulse  is  not  clearly  shown  in  Table  VI.  before  day  25,  while 
the  first  previous  pulse  clearly  persists  until  day  24  if  not  day  22.  Also  the  previous 
pulse  is  not  clearly  shown  until  day  30,  while  the  subsequent  pulse  obviously  extends 

until  day  32. 

The  differences  arise  undoubtedly  in  the  main  from  the  fact  already  noticed  in 
connection  with  the  6-year  period,  that  the  first  previous  and  subsequent  pulses  both 
follow  the  primary  in  having  the  rise  to  the  maximum  more  rapid  than  the  subsequent 
fall.  The  primary  pulse  itself  in  Table  VI.  is  not  clearly  manifest  until  the  second 
.lay  I M -fore  the  selected  disturbed  day,  while  it  clearly  persists  until  the  fourth  day 
thereafter.  But,  in  addition  to  this,  there  is  at  least  a  suggestion  that  the  interval 
lx-t  wen  the  crests  of  the  primary  and  the  first  previous  pulse  is  shorter  than  that 
between  the  crests  of  the  primary  and  the  first  subsequent  pulse.  This  result  is  also 
suggested  by  the  6 -year  data  in  Table  III. 

Even  if  we  accept  the  figures  as  mathematically  exact,  a  real  difference  in  period 
does  not  necessarily  follow.     The  phenomenon  may  be  a  consequence  of  the  diurnal 
variation  which  undoubtedly  exists  in  disturbance.     Analysing  the  list  of  Greenwich 
magnetic  storms  between   1848   and   1903  given  by  Mr.  MAUNDER,*  I  found  that 
accepting  the  times  of  commencement  assigned,  60  per  cent,  of  the  storms  began 
between  noon  and  8  p.m.,  leaving  only  40    per  cent,  for  the  remaining    16  hours. 
Again   at   Potsdam,   where    individual    hours   have    their   disturbance   "character" 
classified,  55^  per  cent,  of  the  hours  counted  as  disturbed  from  1892  to  1901  fell 
between  4  p.m.  and  midnight.     The  natural  inference  is  that  the  disturbances  which 
give  the  "character"  to  the  day  at  Kew  occur  in  the  majority  of  instances  in  the 
afternoon.     Thus,  supposing  the  period  to  be  somewhat  over  27  days,  the  occasions 
when  the  associated  subsequent  disturbance  falls  on  the  28th  day  following  would 
naturally    be    more    numerous   than   the   occasions   when    the    associated    previous 
disturbance   fell    on   the   28th   day   previous.       This   marked    diurnal    variation    of 
disturbance  is  a  difficulty,  whatever  plan  is  adopted.     It  might  seem  at  first  sight 
that  the  international  "character"  data  would  be  unaffected.     This  might  be  so  if 
the  stations  were  uniformly  distributed  in  longitude,  but  in  reality  there  are  but  few 
stations  in  the  hemisphere  whose  central  meridian   is    180°   from    Greenwich,   and 
European  stations  largely  predominate. 

§  15.  The  same  mean  "character"  figure  may  be  arrived  at  in  many  ways.  For 
example,  in  the  case  of  the  1 1  years,  when  660  selected  days  were  dealt  with,  a  mean 
"character"  TOO  might  arise  from  a  1  on  each  day.  or  from  a  2  on  330  days  and  a  0 
on  the  remaining  330  days  ;  or,  more  generally,  from  p  cases  of  0,  p  cases  of  2,  and 
660 -2p  cases  of  1,  where  p  may  be  any  positive  integer  not  exceeding  330.  It  thus 
appeared  desirable  to  ascertain  whether  there  was  an  essential  difference  between  the 
*  '  Astron.  Soc.  Month.  Notices,'  vol.  65,  pp.  2  and  538. 


AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM. 


263 


ways  in  \\  hich  subsequent  and  previous  associated  pulses  were  made  up.  The  enquiry 
\\.-is  confined  to  the  first  of  tin-  previous  and  suksequent  pulses  associated  with  the 
distu  rlx*d  days  of  the  11  ye;n<.  That  period  was  preferred  because  a  greater 
ilefiniteness  attached  to  the  individual  "character"  figures.  When  international 
data  are  taken,  the  figure  assigned  to  any  individual  day  may  be  built  up  in  a  large 
variety  of  ways. 

Table  VII.  shows  the  results  of  the  enquiry  ;  only  the  days  containing  tin-  main  part 
i»C  tin-  pulses  were  considered.  The  data  for  the  subsequent  days  were  derived  from 
S.M.  The  representative  disturbed  day  is  counted  as  day  0. 

TAHI.K  VII. — Analysis  of  "Character"  Figures  during  the  First  Previous  and  the 
First  Subsequent  Pulses  associated  with  Selected  Disturbed  Days  of  1890  to  1900. 


T\n\ro 

Previous  pulse. 

SulisfijuiTit  pulse. 

isays. 

-  30.  -  29.  -  28.  -  27.  -  26.  -  25. 

+  25.  +26.  +27.  +28.  +29.  +30. 

Number  of  "2V.  . 

"  1  't  " 
n      n         P   •  • 

99     105     139     155     126       80 
284     319     312     323     341     359 

79 
302 

96     120     148     132     101       90 
275     305     324     343     354     343 

Disturbed  days  .  .  . 
Quiet            „     ... 

. 

383     424     451     478     467     439 
277     236     209     182     193     221 

381 
279 

371     425     472    475    455     433 

2*9     235     188     185     206     227 

Disturbed  days  in  Table  VII.  include  all  of  "  character  "2  or  1,  those  of  "  character" 
0  being  called  quiet ;  so  that  the  sum  of  the  disturbed  and  quiet  together  necessarily 
amounts  to  660.  The  distribution  one  would  have  had  in  660  average  days  appears 
under  "  normal."  As  regards  the  number  of  2's,  days  +27  and  —27  decidedly  over- 
top their  neighlxnirs.  The  incidence  of  2's  in  the  pulses  is  more  alike  if  we  invert 
the  order  of  days  in  the  previous  pulse,  i.e.,  regard  days  —25  and  +25,  &c.,  as 
corresponding.  But  in  both  pulses  the  marked  tendency  is  for  days  of  moderate 
disturbance  to  follow  the  crest.  No  significance  probably  attaches  to  the  fact  that  2's 
are  slightly  more  numerous  in  the  previous  than  in  the  subsequent  pulse  ;  because, 
while  the  highest  "  character  "  figure  in  the  first  previous  pulse  exceeds  that  in  the 
first  subsequent  pulse  in  the  case  of  the  11-year  period,  it  does  not  do  so  in  the 
6 -year  period. 

§  16.  Table  VIII.,  p.  265,  represents  the  results  of  an  enquiry  into  the  possible  varia- 
tion of  the  27-day  period  throughout  the  year.  The  11-year  and  6-year  periods  were 
treated  separately.  The  660  selected  days  of  the  former  period  gave  55  January 
days  and  so  on.  These  55  January  days  and  the  subsequent  days  associated  with 
them  are  treated  as  a  separate  group  in  Table  VIII.  The  first  two  columns  give  the 
mean  character  figures  for  the  selected  disturbed  days  of  the  12  months,  for  the  two 
periods.  Columns  3  to  8  give  the  mean  character  figures  for  days  25  to  30  subsequent 


..,;4  DR.  C.  CHREE:   SOME  PHENOMENA  OF  SUNSPOTS 

to  the  selected  disturbed  days  of  the  11  years;  columns  9  to  14  do  the  same  for  the 
6  years.  The  largest  "  character"  figure  found  in  days  n  +  25  to  n  +  30  is  in  heavy 
type,  and  the  ratio  borne  by  this  maximum  to  the  character  figure  on  day  n  (i.e.,  the 
ratio' of  the  maximum  for  the  first  subsequent  pulse  to  that  of  the  primary  pulse)  is 
given  for  the  two  periods  separately  in  columns  15  and  16.  Column  17  gives  the 
arithmetic  mean  of  the  ratios  in  the  two  previous  columns. 

Investigations  by  Mr.  W.  ELLIS  and  Mr.  E.  W.  MAUNDER,  covering  a  very  long 
series  of  years,  showed  that  whether  one  considers  magnetic  storms— averaging  about 

13  a  year or  days  of  large  and  moderate  disturbance— averaging  about  77  a  year— 

the  frequency  of  occurrence  of  disturbance  at  Greenwich  is  above  the  average  in  the 
4  equinoctial  months,  and  below  it  in  the  4  summer  months,  May  to  August ;  the 
numbers  in  the  equinoctial  months  standing  to  those  in  the  summer  months  roughly 
in  the  ratio  of  8  to  5. 

A  preponderance  of  disturbances  in  the  equinoctial  months  has  been  noticed  at 
many  other  stations,  but  there  is  reason  to  doubt  whether  it  is  universal. 
Dr.  W.  VAN  BEMMELEN'S  lists  of  disturbances  at  Batavia,  averaging  about  60  a  year, 
showed  but  a  very  slight  excess  in  the  equinoctial  months,  and  the  records  of  Captain 
SCOTT'S  expedition  in  the  Antarctic  during  1902  to  1904  indicated  a  marked  maximum 
of  disturbance  at  midsummer.  Still  the  equinoctial  months  are  undoubtedly  the 
most  disturbed  at  Kew,  or  at  the  average  station  on  which  the  international  figures 
depend. 

In  both  periods  of  years  the  order  in  which  the  months  come  as  regards  disturbance 
is  not  quite  the  same  when  one  takes  the  mean  character  figure  of  the  selected 
disturbed  days,  given  in  Table  VIII.,  as  when  one  takes  the  mean  character  figure  of 
all  days  of  the  month,  or  when  one  takes  the  number  of  days  of  character  "  2." 

In  the  6-year  period  the  months  of  March,  September,  February,  and  October 
appear  to  have  been  distinctly  the  most  disturbed.  In  the  11 -year  period,  March 
and  February  were  clearly  the  most  disturbed,  and  judging  by  the  number  of  days 
of  "  character "  "  2,"  October  came  next.  Thus  both  periods  manifested  the  usual 
tendency  to  an  increase  of  disturbance  towards  the  equinoxes,  but  that  season  was 
less  prominent  than  in  ELLIS  and  MAUNDER'S  lists.  Also  the  want  of  smoothness  in 
the  sequence  of  the  figures  in  the  first  two  columns  of  Table  VIII.  suggests  that 
a  considerably  longer  series  of  years  would  be  required  for  the  elimination  of 
"  accidental "  features. 

All  months  in  Table  VIII.  show  the  first  subsequent  pulse  clearly,  the.  crest 
generally  falling  on  the  27th  day  itself.  The  maximum  in  the  subsequent  pulse  is 
considerably  larger  in  some  months  than  others,  but  the  months  in  which  it  is 
largest,  or  smallest,  are  not  the  same  for  the  two  periods.  In  both,  the  maximum 
figure  is  above  its  average  in  January,  February,  March,  August,  and  September ; 
but  these  months  represent  Winter,  Summer,  and  Equinox. 

Judging   by  the   differences  between   the   two   periods,  and   between   successive 


AND   OF  TKRKKSTKIAL    MACXKTFSM. 


265 


00000000000 


OOOOOOOOOOOO 


OOOOOOOOOOOO 


o 


0 


.  ~  —  T  I  <M  ?  I  -^  .  -  C   /   I  --  !• 


i—  ao  «o  r-  10  oo  x  t^-  !•»  to  to 


1-1000000000 


C".  1.^  O  i  -  O  ~.  — 


0 


OOOOOOOOOOOO 


0000 


r*o 


«3>HOe<3—  •  i—  N  ~  >O  OO  O  t- 


r-li-lrHOOOOOtHOOO 


—  b-OCOlt-t—  t— 


1—000000 


VOL.  COXIII. — A 


M 


266  PR-  C.  CHRKK:  SOME  PHENOMENA  OF  SUNSPOTS 

months,  a  high  value  in  the  maximum  for  the  subsequent  pulse  is  in  considerable 
measure  accidental,  but  even  if  accepted  as  a  physical  fact,  it  might  have  more  than 
one  interpretation. 

When  we  took  from  amongst  the  selected  disturbed  days  those  whose  "  character  " 
figure  exceeded  1'5,  the  amplitude  of  the  associated  pulse  was  decidedly  larger  than 
that  associated  with  the  full  choice  of  5  days  a  month.  Consequently,  the  amplitude 
of  the  subsequent  pulse  increases  with  that  of  the  primary  pulse.  Thus  a  large 
maximum  in  columns  3  to  8,  or  9  to  14,  of  Table  VIII.  is  naturally  regarded  as  due 
at  least  in  part  to  a  large  corresponding  value  in  columns  1  or  2.  But  it  might  also 
arise  from  a  greater  potency  of  the  27-day  period  at  one  season  of  the  year  than 
another,  or  simply  from  a  large  average  amount  of  disturbance  during  the  month  in 
which  the  subsequent  pulse  falls.  If  the  principal  cause  of  a  large  amplitude  in  the 
subsequent  pulse  is  large  amplitude  in  the  primary,  then,  apart  from  accident,  one 
would  expect  only  minor  variations  in  the  ratios  of  these  two  quantities  given  in  the 
three  last  columns  of  Table  VIII.  If,  on  the  other  hand,  the  27-day  period  is 
markedly  more  potent  at  one  season  than  another,  one  would  expect  the  values  of 
the  ratio  to  show  a  marked  annual  variation,  and  this  to  be  at  least  approximately 
the  same  in  columns  15  and  16. 

In  column  15  the  highest  value  exceeds  the  lowest  by  0'28,  or  44  per  cent,  of  the 
mean  value  0'64.  In  column  16  the  corresponding  excess  is  40  per  cent,  of  the  mean 
value.  Thus  the  fluctuations  are  considerable.  But  the  variations,  especially  in 
column  16,  do  not  suggest  any  regular  law,  and  they  do  not  follow  a  parallel  course 
in  the  two  columns. 

It  will  be  found  that  there  is  a  distinct  tendency  for  the  figure  in  column  16  to  be 
high  or  low,  according  as  the  corresponding  figure  in  column  2  is  less  or  greater  than 
the  figure  for  the  immediately  subsequent  month.  In  January  and  July,  for  instance, 
the  ratio  given  in  column  16  is  very  high,  while  the  January  and  July  figures  in 
column  2  are  considerably  less  than  those  for  February  and  August.  The  same 
phenomenon  may  be  traced  in  columns  15  and  1. 

To  see  the  extent  to  which  this  phenomenon  prevails,  the  values  were  calculated  of 
the  ratio  borne  by  the  maximum  figure  in  any  month  in  columns  3  to  8  to  the  figure 
assigned  to  the  next  subsequent  month  in  column  1,  and  the  same  calculation  was 
repeated  for  the  6-year  period.  The  twelve  monthly  ratios  thus  obtained  for  the 
11-year  period  had  the  same  mean  value  0'64  as  the  ratios  in  column  15,  but  they 
ranged  only  from  075  in  September  to  0'55  in  May.  Their  average  departure, 
irrespective  of  sign,  from  their  arithmetic  mean  was  only  0'040,  as  compared  with 
0'053  for  the  ratios  in  column  15.  In  the  case  of  the  6-year  period,  the  corresponding 
figures  were  respectively  0'054  and  0'076. 

'he  days  which  are  from  25  to  30  days  subsequent  to  a  given  selected  disturbed 
day  fall,  in  the  majority  of  instances,  in  the  subsequent  month.  Thus  the  natural 
inference  from  the  previous  figures  is  that  the  amplitude  of  the  first  subsequent  pulse 


AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM.  267 

depends  more  on  the  character  of  the  month  in  which  that  pulse  falls  than  on  the 
amplitude  of  the  primary  dtsfcnrlMHMM  with  which  it  is  associated. 

On  the  whole,  Table  VIII.  suggests  no  special  development  of  the  27-day  period  at 
any  particular  season.  If,  tin-  example,  we  take  the  three  months  clustering  round 
each  equinox  (i.e.,  hVhnuuy  to  April,  and  August  to  October),  the  mean  of  the  ratios 
in  column  17  is  0'653  as  compared  with  0'635  from  the  other  six  months.  A  very 
similar  conclusion  follows  if  we  take  the  ratios  in  which  the  second  member  is  the 
character  of  the  representative  disturbed  day  in  the  month  subsequent  to  the  primary 
pulse. 

When  a  sufficiently  long  series  of  years  is  available,  it  will  be  possible  to  replace 
the  ratios  in  columns  15  to  17  by  others  sufficiently  smooth  to  show  the  real  nature 
of  the  annual  variation,  if  such  exists.  The  investigation  might  then  be  extended  to 
the  second  and  third  subsequent  pulses,  and  to  the  previous  pulses.  When  this  is 
done,  in  the  case  both  of  selected  disturbed  and  selected  quiet  days,  results  of  interest 
may  be  expected. 

§  17.  The  primary  object  of  S.M.  was  to  investigate  the  nature  of  the  connection, 
if  any,  between  sunspots  and  the  daily  range  of  H  (horizontal  force).  Use  was  made 
of  the  Greenwich  projected  sunspot  areas.  The  5  days  of  largest  spot  area  in  each 
month  of  1890  to  1900  formed  the  selected  days,  and  the  mean  H  ranges  at  Kew 
were  found  for  days  previous  and  subsequent  to  the  selected  days.  Denoting  by  n 
the  representative  selected  day  of  large  sunspot  area,  the  H  range  showed  a  marked 
pulse  with  its  crest  at  day  rt  +  4.  Moreover,  when  curves  were  drawn  having  time 
for  abscissae,  the  ordinate  being  in  the  one  case  sunspot  area  and  in  the  other  H  range, 
the  rise  of  the  latter  curve  to  a  maximum  and  its  subsequent  decline  closely  resembled 
the  course  of  the  former  curve,  but  .with  a  lag  of  about  4  days. 

If  we  take  the  H  trace  for  an  individual  highly  disturbed  day,  it  may  be  difficult 
even  for  an  expert  to  recognise  the  influence  of  the  regular  diurnal  variation.  But  if 
a  number  of  such  days  are  combined,  a  regular  diurnal  inequality  emerges,  which  in 
the  case  of  H  differs  little  from  that  characteristic  of  quiet  days,  except  in  being  of 
larger  amplitude.  Even  on  days  of  character  "  2,"  the  H  range  owes  an  appreciable 
amount  to  the  regular  diurnal  inequality,  and  on  the  average  day — especially  in  a 
quiet  year — the  regular  diurnal  inequality  is  the  principal  contributor.  Thus  there 
were  strong  d  priori  reasons  for  regarding  the  relation  described  above  as  involving 
the  regular  diurnal  inequality  rather  than  magnetic  disturbance.  This  view  was 
supported  by  an  examination  of  the  Kew  "character"  figures  for  days  previous  and 
subsequent  to  the  selected  days  of  the  1 1  years.  The  mean  "  character  "  figure  of 
each  column  was  derived  from  5x12x11,  or  660  days.  Of  the  660  days  occurring 
in  column  »  +  4,  where  the  crest  of  the  pulse  in  the  H  ranges  appeared,  86  were  of 
"  character  "  "  2."  Out  of  660  average  days  of  the  11  years,  82  had  a  "character"  "2" ; 
thus  the  excess  of  days  of  "  character  "  "  2  "  in  column  n  +  4  was  only  4,  and  of  the 
31  columns  from  n— 15  to  n+15,  10  showed  an  excess  larger  than  this,  the  excess 

2  M  2 


-I-,- 


I.j;    c.  C'HK'KE:   SOMF    I'llKM 'MKNA    OF   SUNSPOTS 


N-iiiU  in  one  case  14.  The  pulse  in  the  H  range  curve  owed  its  crest  at  day  n  +  4 
almost  rntirely  to  the  frequency  of  days  of  "  character  "  '  1."  The  columns  containing 
most  "2's"  were  n— 12  with  94,  n— 11  with  96,  and  n— 10  with  94.  The  concentra- 
tion of  2's  in  these  columns  proved  to  be  the  chief,  if  not  the  sole,  cause  of  a  subsidiary 
pulse  in  the  H  range  curve,  to  which  there  was  no  corresponding  feature  in  the 
sunspot  curve. 

H  range  data  were  not  available  for  1906  to  1910,  so  no  further  comparison  of  tlu-m 
with  sunspots  was  possible.  But  a  comparison  was  made  between  sunspots  and 
international  "  character "  figures,  taking  the  same  fundamental  days  as  in  the 
previous  part  of  this  paper.  In  the  present  case,  then,  the  basis  of  selection  was  the 
"character"  figure,  whereas  in  S.M.  it  was  the  sunspot  area.  The  research  was  limited 
to  the  5  years  1906  to  1910,  as  Greenwich  spot  areas  for  1911  were  not  published  at 
the  time.  There  were  thus  5x12x5,  i.e.,  300,  representative  days  n.  Spot  areas 
were  entered  in  32  columns,  n— 20  to  w+11,  and  the  columns  were  summed.  The 

TABLE  IX. — Projected  Sunspot  Areas  on  Days  of  Largest  International  "  Character  " 
and  on  Previous  and  Subsequent  Days,  as  Percentages  of  the  Mean  Area  for 
the  Five  Years  1906  to  1910. 


Day    , 

n-20 

n-  19 

71       18 

n     17 

1)      If, 

n        IK 

m         14 

_        -lo 

n  —  id. 

Percentage  

91-7 

90'1 

90  '6 

88-8 

00.  A 

M-  7 

QQ  .  O 

1 

JO  9 

Day    . 

«-  12 

71       11 

;/        10 

Q 

.,           O 

n 

n  —  1  . 

n  —  D. 

71-5. 

Percentage  .... 

91-3 

90-<> 

01  .Q 

Ql'  ^ 

O7  •  7 

OO  .  7 

Jl     1 

yy  i 

102  6 

104  8 

Day    , 

n     4 

•n     3 

no 

„       1 

n  —  1. 

n. 

»+  1. 

ii  +  2. 

n  +  3. 

Percentage  . 

108-4 

108-5 

m.  9 

m-a 

m.  i 

1 

112*2 

•Q 

109-1 

Day    . 

,,4.4. 

M    _1      £ 

n  +  o. 

71+7. 

n  +  8. 

n  +  9. 

71+10. 

w+11. 

Percentage  . 

105-0 

10S-2 

1H9-  1 

m.  t\ 

o 

100  '0 

99-5 

97-8 

94-5 

mean  projected  areas  for  the  years  1906  to  1910  were  in  order  1047,  1453,  952,  941 

157,  the  unit  being  the  one-millionth  of  the  sun's  apparent  disc.     Thus  the  total 

average  days,  60   from   each  year,  comes  to  285,000.       The   figures 

appearing  in  Table  IX^epresent  percentages  of  this  number.     The  three  last  selected 

52,  28  and  29,  1910;  thus  two  days  in  each  of  the  columns 


AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM. 


269 


u  +  4  to  7i  +  9,  and  three  days  in  columns  n+10  and  w-f  II,  fell  in  1911.  As  no 
siins|Hii  data  for  1911  \vciv  availalili-,  \\liil.-  sutis|x»t  areas  in  December,  1910,  were 
veiy  small,  it  was  decided  to  treat  the  few  days  specified  as  spotless.  The  percentage 
figures  in  columns  u  +  4  to  n+11  may  thus  !*•  slightly  too  small,  hut  the  error*  is 
unlikely  to  exceed  <>'•_'. 

The  highest  and  lowest  percentage's  in  the  table  are  in  heavy  type. 

Table  IX.  appears  at  first  sight  to  demonstrate  a  very  definite  relationship  between 
contemporaneous  suns]x>t  area  and  magnetic  disturbance.  It  shows  a  regular  pulse 
in  siinspot  area  whose  crest  ataolutely  synchronises  with  that  in  magnetic  "  character." 
The  form  however  of  the  two  pulses  is  widely  different.  This  is  readily  seen  on 
consulting  fig.  3,  which  represents  graphically  the  sunspot  figures  in  Table  IX.,  and 


130 


Swnspot   Area, 
o    MagrieCic  Character. 


n-20 


zoo 


ta 
o 


150 


o 
o 

1 

<3 


H- 
O 


100 


w-no 


the  corresponding  "  character "  figures  expressed  as  percentages  of  the  mean 
"  character "  figure  for  the  5  years.  The  ordinate  scale,  it  should  be  noticed,  is 
five  times  as  open  for  the  sunspot  areas  as  for  the  magnetic  "  character."  The 
"  character  "  percentage  is  above  100  only  on  5  days,  rising  from  87'6  on  day  n— 3  to 
T.iS'2  on  day  n.  The  sunspot  area,  on  the  other  hand,  is  above  its  mean  from  days 
n— 6  to  »  +  8  inclusive,  and  the  change  from  column  to  column  is  very  gradual 


*  July  2«,  1913. — The  correction  required  is  +0'1  from  day  n  +  7  today  n+  11. 


270  !„;.  Q  niKKK:  SOME  PHENOMENA  OF  RUNSPOTS 

throughout.     Thus  there  is  nothing  in  the  observed  sunspot  variation  to  account  for 
the  rapidity  of  the  variation  in  magnetic  "  character." 

Taking  the  individual  years,  the  largest  sunspot  area  occurred  in  1906  in  column 
n-7,  in  1907  in  column  »+3,  in  1908  in  column  n  +  10,  in  1909  in  column  n-2,  and 
only  in  1910 — a  year  of  small  sunspot  area — did  it  occur  in  column  n.  Thus  the 
occurrence  in  column  n  of  the  highest  percentage  met  with  in  Table  IX.  is  a  fact  of 
somewhat  doubtful  significance.  A  considerably  longer  series  of  years  would  be 
required  to  give  a  result  whose  representative  character  could  be  relied  on. 

§18.  In  S.M.,  in  the  comparison  made  between  sunspot  area  and  magnetic 
"  character,"  the  representative,  days  n  were  the  days  of  largest  spot  area.  On  the 
average  of  the  11  years  1890  to  1900,  magnetic  "character"  was  below  its  mean 
from  days  n— 7  to  n  inclusive,  and  above  its  mean  from  days  n  +  l  to  w  +  11.  The 
highest  "  character  "  figures  appeared  in  columns  n+4  to  n  +  6,  that  in  column  n  +  4 
being  slightly  the  highest.  In  this  case  the  sunspot  area  (primary)  pulse  was  much 
more  concentrated  than  the  "  character  "  (secondary)  pulse,  and  there  was  a  marked 
"character"  crest  in  columns  n-12  to  n-W,  but  little  inferior  to  that  in  columns 
n+4  to  n  +  6  to  which  nothing  in  sunspot  areas  corresponded.  Thus  the  apparent 
connection  between  magnetic  "  character "  and  sunspot  area  was  much  more 
ambiguous  than  that  between  H  daily  ranges  and  sunspots.  Still  the  11 -year  mean 
"  character"  figure  in  column  n  +  s  was  very  decidedly  in  excess  of  that  in  column 
n—s,  for  all  values  of  s  from  1  to  7,  and  the  natural  inference  was  that  in  the 
average  year  there  is  a  distinct  tendency  for  maxima  in  magnetic  disturbance  to 
follow  maxima  in  sunspot  area.  Thus  one  would  have  expected  to  find  in  Table  IX., 
not  an  array  of  figures  symmetrical  about  column  n  but  a  decided  excess  of  the  figure 
in  column  n— *  over  that  in  column  n  +  s  for  small  values  of  s,  the  largest  value 
occurring  prior  to  day  n. 

It  was  obviously  desirable  to  ascertain  whether  the  departure  from  the  result 
anticipated  represented  a  real  difference  between  the  two  periods  dealt  with,  or  arose 
from  the  difference  in  the  procedure  followed.  Accordingly  a  second  investigation 
was  made,  adopting  the  same  procedure  for  1906  to  1910  as  had  been  followed  in  the 
case  of  1890  to  1900,  the  selected  days  n  being  now  the  5  days  of  largest  projected 
spot  area  in  the  month. 

The  calculations  were  made  for  the  "  character  "  figures  assigned  at  Kew  alone,  as 
well  as  for  the  international  choice  at  de  Bilt,  in  view  of  the  possibility  that  the 
results  for  1890  to  1900  in  S.M.  might  have  been  influenced  by  some  peculiarity  in 
the  choice  of  Kew  "  character"  figures.  This  contingency  could  be  provided  for  only 
in  part,  because  the  date  at  which  "character"  figures  were  assigned  to  the  years 
1890  to  1900  was  subsequent  to  1910,  and  undoubtedly  2's  were  more  freely  given 
than  in  dealing  with  the  years  1906  to  1910.  During  the  latter  5  years  2's  were 
given  only  48  times  at  Kew,  as  compared  with  37  times  at  Greenwich  ;  whereas  in 
1911  the  number  of  2's  was  38  at  Kew,  as  against  6  at  Greenwich.  The  Kew 


AND  OF  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM.  271 

standard  was  intentionally  changed  in  1911  ;  whereas  the  Greenwich  standard  has,  I 
believe,  remained  nearly  uniform,  a  "  2,"  these  Ix-in^  roughly  equivalent  to  the 
"  magnetic  storm "  of  ELLIS  and  MAUNDER.  The  number  of  magnetic  storms  in 
Mr.  MAUNDKK'S  list  averaged  about  13  a  year,  while  the  number  of  2's  awarded  to 
the  years  1890  to  1'JOO  at  Kew  averaged  about  44  per  annum. 

Tin-  investigation  irf'ciml  to  ;ilx>vc  was  confined  to  days  n— 2  to  n  +  4,  except  that 
•lay  n— 11  was  added  for  the  Kew  data.  The  results  appear  in  Table  X.  The 
absolute  values  are  given  of  the  mean  "  character  "  figure  for  the  stated  days  of  the 
individual  years.  Values  above  the  normal — or  mean  value  from  all  days — are  in 
heavy  type.  The  percentage  figures  for  1906  to  1910  express  the  arithmetic  means 
of  the  "  character  "  figures  in  column  n— 2,  Ac.,  as  percentages  of  the  corresponding 
mean  of  the  normal  day  values.  The  two  last  lines  give  comparative  percentage 
results  for  the  11  years  1890  to  1900,  and  the  last  five  years  of  that  period 
respectively. 

Table  X.  confirms  the  physical  reality  of  the  difference  between  the  two  periods 
1890  to  1900  and  1906  to  1910,  but  the  percentage  figures  obtained  for  the  later 
period  in  columns  n— 2  to  »  +  4  bear  a  remarkable  resemblance  to  those  applying  to 
the  five  years  1896  to  1900. 

In  the  11-year  period,  1890  to  1900,  it  was  the  contribution  of  the  sunspot 
maximum  years,  1892  to  1894,  which  mainly  determined  the  excess  of  the  "  character" 
figures  in  columns  n  +  s  over  those  in  columns  n—s.  Since  1900  sunspot  development 
has  been  somewhat  poor  and  irregular,  and  the  results  derived  from  the  shorter  period, 
1906  to  1910,  would  naturally  be  less  representative  than  those  derived  from  1890 
to  1900.  Still,  it  would  be  desirable  to  have  results  from  several  11 -year  periods 
before  dogmatising  on  this  point. 

In  the  case  of  the  Kew  "character"  figures  for  1906  to  1910  there  were  thirteen 
occurrences  of  "  2  "  in  days  n  +  3  and  »  +  4,  as  compared  with  eleven  occurrences  on 
days  n— 2,  n— 1,  and  n  +  2,  and  nine  occurrences  on  days  n.  But  the  number  of 
disturbed  days  (i.e.,  days  of  "  2  "  and  "  1 "  combined)  was  most  numerous  on  day  n, 
being  greater  by  one  for  that  day  than  for  day  n  +  3. 

Day  n— 11,  in  1906  to  1910,  had  only  five  occurrences  of  "  2,"  or  nearly  three  below 
normal,  and  occurrences  of  "  0  "  were  five  above  normal ;  whereas  in  1896  to  1900,  as 
in  1890  to  1900,  day  n— 11  had  fewer  occurrences  of  "  0"  than  normal.  Taking  the 
whole  11  years,  1890  to  1900,  day  n— 11,  it  will  be  remembered,  had  more  2's  than 
any  other.  This  was  the  reason  for  including  it  in  Table  X. 

§19.  The  Greenwich  volumes  of  heliographic  results  give  "corrected"  as  well  as 
"  projected "  areas  of  sunspots.  The  corrected  areas  allow  for  foreshortening,  and 
take  as  unit  the  one-millionth  of  the  visible  hemisphere.  Projected  and  corrected 
areas  are  also  given  for  faculse.  It  was  decided  to  replace  the  projected  spot  areas  of 
the  investigation  in  §  17  by  corrected  spot  areas,  projected  faculie,  and  WOLFER'S 
sunspot  frequencies  in  turn.  The  fundamental  days  n,  as  in  §  2,  were  the  300  selected 


DR.  C.  CHKKK:  SO.MK   PHENOMENA  OF  SUNSPOTS 


I 

I 


CO   '  ~    CO  O  CC 

CO  ^O  t*™  1*™  ^O 

OS           OS 

o      o 

O 

c 

o  o  ooo 

r-H            r—  < 

rt 

« 

co  co  fi  a  CM 

CO  t-  1-  CO  t- 

2     S 

0 

r-H 

s 

o  o  o  o  o 

r—  1             i-H 

I-H 

CN 

-f. 

t-  oo  e»  o  co 
10  co  r-  co  r» 

m      <M 
o      o 

O 

8 

o  o  o  o  o 

r-H            r-H 

r-H 

s 

. 

O  t—  O  >O  t» 

B 

4. 

m  co  t**  co  i>- 

o      o 

0 

CC 

o  o  o  o  o 

r-H            r-H 

I-H 

£ 

m  co  o  10  t- 

OS         00 

O 

s 

8 

,.,-_,- 

O        OS 

r-H 

§ 

O  0  0  0  0 

"~" 

1 

»—  « 
1 

«>•  co  oo  >e>  et 

'O  t-  CO  CO  1- 

i-      in 

O        OS 

O 

> 

5* 

O  0  O  OO 

l-H 

I-H 

k 

E 
M 

C-i 

OO  i~   t^  t*»  O4 

iO    •-    I-  CO  1- 

00             rH 

O          OS 

co 

O 

8 

b  o  b  bb 

r-H 

CM  t~  «9  O  OO 

in  co  co  CD  10 

co      in 

OS        O 

1 

b  b  b  b  b 

I—1 

8 

Ifr 

o-3 

CO  r-H   in   00   •* 

m  t-  co  10  co 
b  b  b  b  o 

1 

-*' 

^(  lO  CO  ^*  OS 

t-  CO  t-  t^  CD 

§ 

s 

b  b  bb  b 

^^ 

+ 

O  00  O>  OO  t1* 

CO  CO   I~  CO   t~ 

oo 

o 

s 

b  bb  b  b 

r-H 

+ 

i—  1  CO  CO  t-  ^ 

co  co  r~  co  oo 

CO 

o 

8 

o  o  o  o  o 

r-H 

S 

b 

1 

r-H 

8 

os  m  ic  o  co 
:  "  -r  t-  i-  oo 

o  o  o  o  o 

t— 

o 

I-H 

t. 

CO 

s. 

O  O  «5  i-l  CO 
CO  t*  t*  t*  00 

oo 
o 

a 

o  o  o  o  o 

r-H 

S 

E 

1 

| 

O-l  OJ  rjt  OJ  1O 

co  t*  t~  co  t* 

CO 

O 

8 

o  o  o  oo 

"3 

c 
_o 

| 

•*  I>  CO  O  CO 
CD  CO  t-  t-  1> 

•B 

8 

O  0  O  OO 

2 

1 

q 

HH 

1* 

in  co  oo  CM  cq 

CO  CO  CO  CO  t>- 

2    S 

OS         OS 

o 
o 

OS 

fc"9 

o  o  o  o  o 

o        . 

B 

•      •      •      •      . 

to      o 

O          O> 

co 

05 

Ci        00 

00 

i-H             r-H 

r-H 

1 



I 

000§2 

—         r. 

g 

o 

_  _  _  „  rt 

AH 

ANH   oi    TERRESTRIAL   MACNRTIS.M. 


disturl>cd  days  of  the  five  years  1906  to  1910.  The  investigation  was 
restricted  to  the  seven  days  n  —  3  to  n  +  3.  The  results  for  the  several  years  appear 
in  Tahle  XL,  the  figures  being  expressed  as  percentages  of  the  normal  value  of  the 
quantity  concerned  for  the  year  in  question. 

TABLE  XI. — Relation  of  Sunspot  Areas  and  Frequencies  and  of  Faculee  to  Magnetic 
DisturlKince  (?/,  Ix-ing  Representative  Day  of  Large  Disturlmnce). 


Year. 

Greenwich  whole  spot  areas. 

Projected. 

Corrected. 

w-3. 

»-2. 

»-l. 

«.  n+1. 

»  +  2.  n  +  3. 

»  -  3.  n  -  2. 

n-1. 

n.  n+1. 

«  +  2. 

fi  +  3. 

1906  
1907  

91 
108 
113 

ll'l 

120 

83 
114 
112 
124 
134 

84 
120 
114 
123 
139 

85  87 
124  128 
114  106 
121  112 
141  137 

88 
133 
97 
104 
137 

88 
134 
93 
100 
137 

100   94 
107  1  1  2 
109  114 
118  118 
117  127 

91 
113 
110 
111 
128 

88   86 
118  119 
114  106 
114  111 
134  129 

88 
124 
99 
109 
132 

87 
128 
98 
103 
130 

1908  
1909  

1910  

First  mean  .  .  . 
Second  mean  .  . 

111 
108 

113 
110 

116 
113 

117  114 
114  112 

112 

111 

110 
109 

110  11." 
109  111 

111 
108 

114  110 
111  108 

110 

109 

109 
108 

Year. 

WOLFER'S  frequencies. 

Greenwich  faculaa  projected  areas. 

n~3. 

n-2. 

n-1. 

n.  n+1. 

W  +  2.M  +  3. 

n-3.n-2. 

«-l. 

n.  n+1. 

n  +  2. 

n  +  3. 

1906  

90 
109 
108 
110 
114 

92 
113 
111 
111 
125 

92 
108 
106 
107 
129 

91  89 
114  113 
101  96 
105  104 
119  119 

92 
112 
95 
104 
115 

93 
113 
93 
101 
119 

98   97 
101  101 
105  112 
112   99 
116  114 

101 
93 
111 
101 
104 

96   95 
92   97 
103   95 
103  108 
110  101 

90 
98 
93 
105 
102 

94 
103 
96 
102 
101 

1907  

1908  

1909  

1910  

First  mean  .  .  . 
Second  mean  .  . 

106 
105 

110 

108 

108 
105 

106  104 
104  103 

104 

102 

104 

102 

106  105 
105  104 

102 
102 

101   99 

99   98 

98 
96 

99 
96 

Of  the  two  sets  of  mean  values  given  in  the  last  two  lines  of  Table  XL,  the  first 
are  arithmetic  means  of  the  percentages  for  the  individual  years ;  the  second  were 
obtained  by  summing  the  area  or  frequency  figures  for  the  300  days  in  each  column, 
and  expressing  the  mean  as  a  percentage  of  the  corresponding  mean  derived  from  all 
days  of  five  years. 

Table  XL  shows  that,  at  least  for  the  years  considered,  it  does  not  much  matter 
whether  projected  or  corrected  spot  areas  are  taken  for  comparison  with  magnetic 
disturbances.  If  anything,  the  projected  percentages  are  a  trifle  the  larger.  We 


VOL.    CCXIII. A. 


2  N 


.,-,  DR.  C.  CHREE:   SMMK    I'HKNaMKNA  OF  SUNS  POTS 


,.\|  .....  t.-.l  ..  marked  difference  if  the  proximity  of  the  spot  —  supposed  to 
•••  disturbance  —  to  the  central  meridian  had  been  an  important  element. 
Win.  n:i:'s  frequencies  give  results  of  (he  same  general  character  as  spot  areas,  but 
tin-  percentages  are  decidedly  smaller.  Also  the  percentages  in  the  last  two  lines 
derived  from  the  Wolfer  frequencies  are  less  symmetrical  with  respect  to  column  n, 
IKMIIJJ  distinctly  larger  for  the  previous  than  for  the  succeeding  days.  This  a-symmetry 
is  still  more  developed  in  the  percentages  based  on  facuhe. 

On  the  average  of  the  five  years,  the  maximum  magnetic  disturbance  was 
preceded  by  two  days  by  the  Wolfer  frequency  maximum,  and  by  at  least  four  days 
by  the  maximum  faculse  area. 

On  the  average  highly  disturbed  day,  the  faculae  area  was  almost  exactly  normal. 

Whether  we  take  spot  areas  or  frequencies,  1906  shows  a  markedly  diminished 
solar  activity  for  days  »—  2  to  n  +  3  ;  and  1910  —  -a  year  of  small  solar  activity  and 
very  quiet  magnetically  —  is  the  year  which  most  strongly  suggests  a  parallel  variation 
between  magnetic  disturbances  and  solar  activity. 

§  20.  It  appeared  desirable  to  ascertain  the  extent  to  which  a  27-28  day  period  of 
the  type  here  considered  manifests  itself  in  sunspots  themselves.  The  selected  days 
of  the  investigation  were  the  five  days  of  largest  projected  spot  area  in  each  month 
of  the  five  years  1906  to  1910.  Projected  spot  areas  were  entered  in  the  columns  for 
days  n-30,  n-28,  n-27,  n-25,  n,  n  +  25,  n  +  27,  n  +  28,  and  n+30.  That  seemed 
likely  to  be  a  sufficient  choice  of  days  to  show  the  nature  and  amplitude  of  the 
anticipated  phenomenon.  The  results  obtained  are  given  in  Table  XII.  In  the  first 
five  lines  the  projected  spot  areas  are  expressed  in  terms  of  the  Greenwich  unit. 
The  five  subsequent  days  associated  with  the  five  selected  days  of  December  1910  had 
to  be  omitted,  so  the  entries  for  columns  n  +  25  to  n  +  30  in  that  year  were  based  on 
55  days  oidy. 

The  results  for  the  300  (or  295)  days  included  in  each  column  were  summed,  and 
each  sum  was  expressed  as  a  percentage  of  that  for  the  normal  day. 

The  last  line  in  Table  XII.  gives  for  comparison  corresponding  results  calculated  for 
the  first  previous  and  first  subsequent  pulses  in  "  character  "  figures,  the  selected 
days  ?i  in  this  case  being  those  of  maximum  "  character"  for  the  sixty  months  of  the 
five  years. 

If  we  take  a  mean  from  the  previous  and  subsequent  pulses  in  Table  XII.,  the 
largest  excess  above  the  normal  in  the  first  subsidiary  pulse  bears  to  that  in  the 
primary  pulse  the  ratio  27  :  122,  or  0'221  :  1,  for  the  spot  areas,  and  21  "5  :  98,  or 
1,  for  magnetic  "  character."  This  is  a  very  striking  resemblance.  It  did  not, 
however,  extend  to  individual  years.  Thus  the  previous  and  subsequent  sunspot  area 
curves  were  better  developed  in  1907  than  in  the  other  years,  but  the  development 

the  previous  "character"  pulse  was  best  in  1908,  and  that  of  the  subsequent 
"  character"  pulse  was  better  in  1908,  1909,  and  1910  than  in  1907. 

A  noteworthy  difference  is  that  the  crests  of  the  subsidiary  sunspot  area  pulses  in 


AND  OP  TERRESTRIAL   MAGNETISM. 


•.'7.. 


Table  XII  appear  on  days  n— 28  and  n  +  28,  and  not  on  days  n— 27  and  n-t-27  as  in 
the  case  of  magnetic  "  character."  It  is  also  curious  that  the  spot  area  on  day  n  — 28 
should  so  largely  exceed  tint  on  day  //+28.  As  this  phenomenon,  however,  is  not 
shown  in  1906  it  may  be  "accidental."  The  sunspot  uiv;i  pulses,  both  primary  and 

TAHLK  XII. — The  27-28-Day  Period  in  Projected  Sunspot  Areas  (n  being  the 

I!f|.i-.-.i'iii;iti\  r  I  i.iy  •  •!'  Large  Spot  AI-.-.-I  ). 


Year. 

n  -  30.  n  -  28.  n  -  27.  «  -  25. 

n. 

»»  +  25.  »  +  27.  n  +  28.  n  +  30. 

Normal 
day. 

1906  

968  1069  1058   938 

2234 

954  1118  1170  1137 

1047 

1907    

22H  2398  2339  2018 

3136 

1685  1991  2001  1891 

1  4.r>3 

1908  

1170  1416  1466  1  •«:;.•: 

2110 

1155  1130  1114  1117 

952 

1909  

1306  1086   941   7.'.7 

3137 

1006  1058  1074  1099 

941 

1910  

431   394   401   371 

933 

394   340   320   286 

357 

Percentage  of  normal  \ 
(sunspots)  .  .  .  J 
Percentage  of  normal  1 
("character")  .  .  J 

128   134   131   116 

98   114   121   111 

822 

198 

109   119   12.0   117 
99   122   116   106 

100 
100 

secondary,  appear  considerably  rounder  than  those  in  magnetic  "  character,"  and  this 
is  probably  responsible  for  the  greater  variability  in  the  position  of  the  crest  in  the 
subsidiary  pulses  of  sunspot  area  than  in  those  of  magnetic  "  character."  Thus  in 
190!)  and  1910  the  largest  spot  area  in  the  subsidiary  pulses  appear  on  day  n  —  30  ; 
while  the  spot  areas  on  day  n— 25  in  1909,  and  on  days  n  +  27,  «  +  28  and  «  +  30  in 
1910  are  actually  below  the  normal. 

§21.  The  results  obtained  in  S.M.  and  in  the  present  paper  put  it  Ixjyond  a  doubt 
that  there  is  in  terrestrial  magnetism  a  period  of  alxiut  27  days,  in  the  sense  that  if 
day  TI  is  either  decidedly  more  or  decidedly  less  disturbed  than  the  normal  day,  then 
days  n± 27  show  a  distinct  tendency  to  differ  from  the  normal  day  in  the  same 
direction  as  day  n.  The  characteristic  is  just  as  clearly  shown  by  quiet  days  as  by 
disturbed  days.  The  phenomenon  appears  in  disturbed  years  and  in  quiet  years,  in 
years  of  many  and  in  years  of  few  sunspots.  It  was  particularly  prominent  in  1911 
when  sunspots  were  few,  and  it  was  also  well  developed  in  1910,  a  year  in  which  only 
one  day  \vas  award.-  1  character  "  2  "  at  Greenwich. 

Prof.  SnnsTKii,  as  is  well  known,  has  adduced  arguments  which  appear  fatal  to  the 
view  that  a  magnetic  sit. mi  on  the  earth  can  l>e  due  to  any  limited  jet  of  electrified' 
particles  emanating  from  the  sun.  It  may  thus  seem  a  waste  of  time  to  consider 
other  difficulties,  in  the  way  of  jet  theories,  suggested  by  the  present  enquiry.  There 
an-,  however,  physicists,  with  whom  I  to  some  extent  sympathise,  who  have  a  feeling 
that  demonstrations  of  the  impossibility  of  some  physical  hypothesis  may  prove  in 
the  long  run  less  conclusive  than  was  at  first  supposed.  Fresh  physical  discoveries 
may  remove  what  seemed  at  one  time  insuperable  barriers.  Thus  it  may  not  be 

2  N  2 


in:,  c.  CHI;I:I:    s..\n:  nil  NO.MHNA  OF  SUNSPOTS 

(1  effort  to  direct  attention  to  the  difficulty  which  seems  to  be  raised  by  tin- 
oonspininiis  nature  of  the  27-day  period  in  quiet  days.  The  rapidity  of  the  decline 
in  disturlKim-e  and  the  rapidity  of  its  resuscitation  after  the  representative  quiet  day 
are  prominent  facts.  It  will  hardly,  I  think,  be  suggested  that  there  are  limited  solar 
I  -similar  to  sunspots  in  dimensions — whose  direct  presentation  to  tin-  earth 
exerte  a  soothing  or  damping  influence  on  magnetic  disturbance  on  the  earth,  removing 
or  diminishing  disturbances  which  otherwise  would  have  made  their  presence  felt. 

§  22.  A  serious  difficulty  in  the  way  of  an  exact  determination  of  the  period  is  that 
magnetic  storms,  and  magnetically  quiet  times,  are  events  usually  covering  a  large 
iiumW  of  hours.  A  magnetic  storm  is  seldom  confined  to  a  single  day.  Successive 
magnetic  st»rms  do  not  as  a  rule  present  closely  similar  features,  nor  are  they  usually 
of  closely  similar  length.  There  is  thus  as  a  rule  no  such  thing  as  a  definite  interval 
between  them.  In  the  majority  of  cases  opinions  would  differ — often  by  hours — as  to 
when  a  magnetic  storm  logins,  and  still  more  so  as  to  when  it  ends.  The  uncertainty 
is  least  about  the  time  of  commencement,  and  that  is  presumably  the  reason  why 
Mr.  MAUNDER  calculated  his  intervals  from  the  times  of  commencement.  If,  however, 
one  could  assign  exact  intervals  for  the  beginning  and  ending,  the  natural  interval 
would  seem  to  be,  not  the  time  from  beginning  to  beginning,  but  the  time  from  centre 
to  centre.  If  wo  accept  a  jet  theory,  then  if  the  second  of  two  magnetic  storms  is 
shorter  than  the  first,  the  jet  and  so  presumably  the  corresponding  solar  area  has 
contracted.  In  the  absence  of  definite  knowledge  to  the  contrary,  the  most  natural 
hypothesis  would  seem  to  be  that  the  jet  has  contracted  uniformly  about  its  centre. 

If  successive  magnetic  storms  were  of  roughly  equal  duration,  and  if  in  a  number  of 
instances  they  both  had  what  are  termed  "  sudden  commencements,"  much  less 
uncertainty  would  attach  to  the  interval.  As  I  pointed  out,  however,  in  a  review  of 
Mr.  MAUNDEK'S  first  paper,  Nature  but  seldom  presents  this  simple  case.  Of  the 
276  magnetic  storms  which  Mr.  MAUNDER'S  list  gave  for  Greenwich  between  1882 
and  1903,  only  77  had  "sudden  commencements."  Of  the  91  storms  which  he 
regarded  as  showing  a  27-28  day  period  during  these  22  years,  only  15  had  "sudden 
commencements,"  and  there  were  only  four  cases  in  which  two  successive  storms  of 
his  sequence  groups  had  both  "  sudden  commencements." 

The  definition  of  a  magnetic  storm  is  purely  arbitrary.  A  striking  example  of  this 
is  afforded  by  the  Kew  and  Greenwich  lists  of  "  character  "  figures  supplied  in  190G, 
1907  and  1908  to  de  Bilt.  In  both  lists  the  days  of  character  "  2" — i.e.,  magnetic 
storms  according  to  Greenwich  standard — numbered  29,  but  only  19  of  these  days 
were  common  to  the  two  lists.  Both  lists  gave  eleven  2's  in  1907  ;  but  the 
Greenwich  list  gave  nine  2's  in  each  of  the  years  1906  and  1908,  while  the  Kew 
list  gave  five  in  the  former  year  and  thirteen  in  the  latter.  Thus  if  attention  is 
confined  to  "magnetic  storms,"  where  one  man  gets  a  sequence  of  approximately 
the  right  period,  another  gets  no  sequence  at  all.  If,  on  the  other  hand,  one  takes 
disturbances  moderate  as  well  as  large,  the  number  is  so  great  that  it  does  not  require 


AND  OK  TKREE8TBIAL   MAGNETISM.  277 

any  great  skill  to  find  between  pairs  of  them  intervals  of  27  flays,  or  of  any  other 
imml>er  of  days  which  the  individual  desires. 

The  dithVulties  in  the  way  of  treating  disturbances  individually  exist  in  at  least 
equal  measure  in  the  case  of  quiet  days.  On  some  occasions  a  quiet  time  ends  with 
great  precipitancy,  hut  t"  say  exactly  when  it  commences  would  usually  prove  an 
impossible  task. 

I  have  referred  t<>  this  aspect  of  the  problem  l>ecause  it  is  rather  a  fashion  amongst 
experimentalists  to  regard  statistical  enquiries  such  as  the  present  with  suspicion. 
They  an-  unable  wholly  to  purge  themselves  of  the  popular  superstition  that  statistics 
can  prove  anything  which  the  statistician  desires.  In  the  present  case,  however,  the 
popular  view  is  the  exact  opposite  of  the  truth.  The  statistics  employed  are  in  large 
part  international  data,  published  before  the  enquiry  commenced,  and  based  on 
estimates  of  magnetic  "  character  "  made  independently,  at  ol«ervatories  Mattered 
IIMT  the  world,  by  individuals  none  of  whom  had  any  suspicion  of  the  purpose  to 
which  they  would  be  put.  The  observational  data,  on  the  other  hand,  are  usually  of 
so  complex  a  nature,  and  so  influenced  by  the  latitude  and  longitude  of  the  station, 
that  the  observer  does  not  know  what  to  regard  as  essential  and  what  to  consider 
secondary.  Moreover,  the  record  is  in  nearly  all  cases  photographic.  Except  in  a 
few  of  the  better  staffed  observatories,  the  fact  that  a  magnetic  storm  has  occurred  is 
not  known  until  a  day  or  two  afterwards,  when  the  photographic  sheets  have  been 
developed.  If  a  continuous  succession  of  solar  pictures  and  contemporary  magnetic 
changes  could  appear  side  by  side  during  the  actual  progress  of  a  magnetic  storm,  an 
olwerver  would  have  a  better  chance  of  framing  the  right  guess  as  to  the  nature  of 
the  solar  link,  provided  corresponding  events  on  the  sun  and  earth  are  nearly 
simultaneous,  or  are  separated  by  a  constant  small  interval  of  time.  In  the  case, 
however,  of  sunspots  and  the  amplitude  of  the  daily  H  range  at  Kew,  during  the 
eleven  years  1890  to  1900,  the  results  reached  in  S.M.  indicated  a  clear  lag  of  aliout 
four  days  in  the  magnetic  range,  and  they  were  at  least  consistent  with  a  similar  lag 
in  magnetic  "  character."  The  results  of  the  present  paper  do  not  suggest  a  lag  in 
magnetic  "  character,"  but  the  rate  of  change  of  sunspot  area  near  the  time  of 
maximum  "  character,"  as  shown  in  Table  IX.  arid  fig.  3,  is  slow,  so  that  the  question 
of  lag  in  "  character  "  is  still  an  open  one.  If  there  is  a  lag,  and  especially  if  the  lag 
is  of  variable  amount — as  might  well  be  the  case  if  cathode  rays  or  electrified 
particles  are  concerned — the  difficulties  in  the  way  of  direct  observation  will  be 
materially  increased. 

We  have  seen  that  magnetic  "  character  "  and  sunspots  have  both  periods  of  from 
27  to  28  days.  In  some  years  the  phenomena  are,  so  to  speak,  in  phase,  in  other 
years  not  in  phase.  The  period  seems  better  developed  in  some  years  than  in  others, 
and  the  years  in  which  it  is  l)est  developed  do  not  seem  to  be  necessarily  the  same  for 
tin-  two  sets  of  phenomena. 


[     279     ] 


VII.   On  the  Diurnal  Variations  of  the  Earth's  Magnetism  produced  by  the 

Moon  and  Sun. 

By  S.  CHAPMAN,  B.A.,  D.Sc.,  Chief  Assistant  at  the  Royal  Observatory,  Greenwich. 

(Communicated  by  the  Astronomer  Royal.) 
Received  April  24,— Read  June  19,  1913. 

CONTENTS. 

Page 

Introduction 279 

PART  I. — General  Discussion 281 

PART  II. — Mathematical  Theory 288 

PART  III. — The  Observational  Material 307 

Introduction. 

§  1.  WHILE  the  observational  study  of  terrestrial  magnetism  is  receiving  ever  more 
and  more  attention,  and  being  rewarded  with  success  by  the  acquisition  of  new  and 
important  data,  the  theoretical  side  of  the  subject  shows  a  much  less  rapid  advance. 
The  search  for  a  physical  theory  of  the  earth's  magnetism  and  its  changes  is 
fascinating  but  elusive.  Perhaps  in  one  case  only — that  of  SCHUSTER'S  important 
theory*  of  the  diurnal  variations  of  the  magnetic  state  of  the  earth — has  there  been 
put  forward  a  clearly  outlined  theory  which  promises  to  explain  the  real  mechanism 
of  any  magnetic  phenomenon. 

On  this  theory,  the  solar  diurnal  variations  are  attributed  to  the  action  of  electro- 
motive forces  produced  in  masses  of  conducting  air  in  the  upper  atmosphere,  by  their 
motion  across  the  permanent  magnetic  field  of  the  earth.  The  magnetic  field  of  the 
resulting  electric  currents  is  identified  with  that  which  produces  the  observed  diurnal 
changes.  SCHUSTER  has  shown  that  if  the  motion  of  the  air  is  taken  to  be  sub- 
stantially that  which  is  indicated  by  the  barometric  variations,  the  atmosphere  being 
supposed  to  oscillate  as  a  whole,  the  conductivity  required  by  the  theory  is  not 
unreasonable,  considering  the  ionization  of  the  tenuous  upper  atmosphere  by  ultra- 

*  '  Phil.  Trans.,'  A,  vol.  208,  p.  163. 
VOL.  CCXIII. — A    503.  Published  separately,  August  22,  1913. 


280  DR  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIUENAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 

x  iol,-t  radiation  from  the  sun.*  The  fundamental  assumptions  are  in  accordance  with 
S. •  HI-SIKH'S  demonstrationt  that  the  magnetic  variations  are  principally  due  to  a 
system  of  currents  above  the  earth's  surface.  In  order  to  explain  the  relative 
magnitudes  of  the  diurnal  and  semi-diurnal  terms  in  the  magnetic  potential,  it  is 
necessary  to  suppose  that  the  conductivity  of  the  atmosphere  varies  with  the  solar 
hour  angle,  which  is  certainly  a  priori  probable :  the  great  excess  of  the  summer 
variation  over  the  winter  variation  is  unexplained,  however,  as  the  usual  rapid  rate 
of  recombination  of  ions  makes  it  difficult  to  believe  that  the  solar  ionization  is  slowly 

cumulative. 

There  is  at  present  much  uncertainty  as  to  the  numerical  constants  of  the  potential 
of  the  magnetic  field  responsible  for  the  solar  diurnal  variations,  as  the  only  two 
calculations  yet  madej  show  serious  disagreement.  A  new  determination  of  this 
potential  is  now  in  progress  at  the  Royal  Observatory,  Greenwich.  Whatever  be  the 
result  of  this  calculation,  however,  there  will  remain  several  important  features  of  the 
phenomenon  which  require  explanation — in  particular,  the  seasonal  changes.  By 
the  elucidation  of  these  difficulties,  terrestrial  magnetism  may  throw  light  on  the 
ionization  of  the  upper  atmosphere.  The  variables  at  disposal  in  the  theory  are, 
unluckily,  too  numerous  to  get  very  definite  knowledge  of  any  one  of  them  from  a 
single  source,  and  therefore  it  is  peculiarly  fortunate  that  there  is  a  kindred  but 
independent  set  of  phenomena,  produced  by  the  moon  jointly  with  the  sun,  which 
promises  very  valuably  to  supplement  the  knowledge  furnished  by  the  solar  diurnal 
variations.  It  should  be  specially  instructive  to  compare  the  seasonal  changes  of  the 
two  sets  of  phenomena. 

§  2.  The  general  outlines  of  this  paper  may  be  briefly  indicated  here.  The  principal 
known  facts  regarding  the  lunar  magnetic  variation  are  first  summarized,  and  it  is 
shown  that,  so  far  as  they  go,  they  seem  most  easily  explicable  in  the  manner 
proposed  by  SCHUSTER  for  the  solar  diurnal  variations.  Nothing  in  the  nature  of  a 
proof  is  yet  possible  however.  Some  new  facts,  deduced  by  harmonic  analysis  of 
existing  material  for  the  lunar  variation  at  the  separate  phases  of  the  moon,  are  then 
described,  and  it  is  pointed  out  how  they  confirm  the  hypothesis  of  the  variable 
conductivity  of  the  atmosphere  in  a  very  direct  way,  and  provide  a  powerful  means 
of  quantitatively  investigating  the  changes  of  the  conductivity.  The  details  of  the 
calculation  of  these  new  harmonic  terms  in  the  lunar  variation,  and  the  actual  tables 
of  results,  are  collected  in  Part  III.  of  the  paper.  In  order  to  discuss  the  bearing  of 
these  observational  results  on  the  theory,  it  is  necessary  to  extend  SCHUSTER'S 
calculation  of  the  effect  of  an  atmospheric  oscillation,  under  the  influence  of  the 
earth's  radial  magnetic  forces  and  the  variable  conductivity  of  the  air,  in  producing 

*  That  there  is  a  highly  conducting  layer  in  the  upper  atmosphere  is  also  indicated  by  the  bending  of 
electric  waves  round  the  earth. 

t  '  Phil.  Trans.,'  A,  vol.  180,  p.  467. 

J  SCHUSTER,  '  Phil.  Trans.,'  A,  vol.  180,  p.  467  ;  and  FRITSCHE,  St.  Petersburg,  1902. 


EARTHS  MAGNETISM  PRODUCED  BY  THE  MOOT*  AND  SUN.  281 

magnetic  diurnal  variations.  The  calculations  are  given  in  Part  II.,  in  a  very  general 
funn;  the  work  is  in  some  respects  simpler  and  more  direct  than  in  SCHUSTER'S 
investigation,  owing  to  the  adnptinn  of  the  resistivity,  instead  of  the  conductivity, 
as  the  variable.  The  formal  results  (which  as  yet,  however,  are  at  a  somewhat 
incomplete  stage)  are  reduced  to  numerical  form  and  compared  with  the  observed 
data.  The  whole  of  the  discussion  is  collected  in  Part  I.,  and  it  is  shown  that  the 
fourth  harmonic  component  of  the  lunar  variation  favours  the  assumption  that  the 
atmospheric  conductivity  may  fall  to  a  very  small  value  during  the  night  hours. 
The  question  of  the  seasonal  variations,  as  affecting  both  the  solar  and  lunar  effects, 
is  barely  touched  on,  since  though  it  arises  naturally  from  the  calculations  in  Part  II., 
better  observational  material  is  necessary  to  reali/e  the  proper  use  of  the  theoretical 
work.  A  fuller  discussion  is  reserved  therefore  till  the  new  determination  of  the 
potential  of  the  solar  variation,  already  mentioned,  is  completed. 


I'AliT     I.  — 

§  3.  The  magnetic  elements  show  regular  periodic  changes  depending  on  the  lunar 
hour  angle,'  just  as  on  the  solar  hour  angle  :  the  latter  variations  are  considerably  the 
greater  of  the  two,  and  .almost  entirely  mask  the  lunar  variations.  KREIL,*  of 
Prague,  in  1841,  first  established  the  existence  of  these  changes,  and  since  then  a 
very  limited  number  of  investigators!  have  confirmed  and  extended  KREIL'S 
discovery.  Owing  to  the  nearly  equal  length  of  the  solar  and  lunar  days,  the 
separation  of  the  two  effects  involves  considerable  rearrangement  of  the  observed 
data  as  usually  tabulated,  and  the  smallness  of  the  lunar  variation  renders  it 
necessary  to  deal  with  a  large  quantity  of  material  in  order  to  eliminate  accidental 
errors.  The  determination  of  the  lunar  diurnal  variation  for  the  three  magnetic 
elements  at  a  single  station  is  therefore  a  laborious  undertaking,  and  hardly  any 
observatory,  as  yet,  includes  such  an  examination  of  its  observations  in  its  scheme  of 
work.  If  the  potential  of  the  magnetic  field  producing  these  variations  is  to  be 
found,  however,  they  must  be  computed  not  merely  for  one,  but  for  several  stations, 
well  distributed  on  the  earth's  surface.  This  formidable  task  would  be  much 

*  Bohemian  Society  of  Sciences,  1841. 

t  BROUN,  'Trevandrum  Observations,'  I.,  1874;  CHAMBERS,  'Phil.  Trans.,'  A,  voL  178,  p.  1  (1887)  ; 
'  Batavian  Observations,"  BERGSMA  and  VAN  DBR  STOK,  vols.  I.,  III.,  IX.,  X.,  XVI.,  also  •  Proc.  Roy. 
Acad.,'  Amsterdam,  IV.,  1887,  and  '  Archives  Nderlandaises,"  XVI.  ;  FIGEE,  '  Batavian  Observations,' 
XXVI.,  1903;  LAMONT,  'Sitz.  d.  K.  Akad.  d.  Wiss.,1  1864,  t.  11,  2,  Munich.  SABINK,  'Phil.  Trans.,' 
1863,  1856,  1857  ;  'Roy.  Soc.  Proc.,'  X.,  1859-1860. 

Also  the  published  ol>scrvations  at  St.  Helena,  Toronto,  Hobarton,  and  Cape  of  Good  Hope  (edited  by 
SAIIINK),  and  at  Melbourne,  Dublin,  and  Philadelphia.  Also  AIRY,  'Greenwich  Observations,'  1859 
and  1867. 

Also  Moos,  '  Bombay  Magnetic  Observations,'  1846-1905,  vol.  II.  (1910)  ;  and  VAN  BEMMEI.EN,  '  Met. 
Zoitschr.,'  May,  1912. 

VOL.  COXIII.  -  A.  2    O 


DR.  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 

expedited  if  various  observatories  would  undertake  the  reduction  of  their  own  data 
on  a  unif'Tiii  plan,  and  it  is  partly  in  the  hope  that  some  may  be  induced  to  co-operate 
in  this  work  that  the  present  preliminary  paper  has  been  written. 

§  4.  When  determined  from  the  mean  of  a  number  of  whole  lunations,  the  lunar 
diurnal  variation  is  found  to  be  always  of  the  same  character,  for  every  element  and 
at  every  station :  it  consists  solely  of  a  very  regular  semi-diurnal  oscillation.  Other 
harmonic  components  of  relatively  small  amplitude  may  be  present,  but  their  lack  of 
regularity  and  consistency  proves  them  to  be  accidental  inequalities  which  are  no  real 
part  of  the  phenomenon.  This  simplicity  makes  it  probable  that  the  lunar  diurnal 
variation  will  be  easier  to  explain  than  the  solar  diurnal  variation. 

SCHUSTER'S  theory  of  the  latter  naturally  suggests  that  the  former  is  due  to  the 
lunar  tidal  oscillations  of  the  atmosphere.  These  oscillations  have  very  little  effect 
upon  the  barometer,  the  ordinary  diurnal  barometric  variation  being  a  thermal  and 
not  a  tidal  effect ;  but  a  lunar  barometric  tide  does  exist,  and  has  been  evaluated 
with  a  considerable  degree  of  accuracy  at  some  tropical  stations  (St.  Helena, 
Singapore,  and  Batavia).*  The  explanation  gains  weight  from  the  fact  that  at 
perigee  the  lunar  magnetic  variations  are  of  distinctly  greater  amplitude  than  at 
apogee,t  and  there  is  some  evidence  that  the  ratio  of  the  amplitudes  at  the  two 
seasons  is  that  which  would  be  predicted  by  the  tidal  theory  (1'23),  though  the 
observational  results  do  not  suffice,  as  yet,  to  establish  this  definitely. 

§  5.  Dr.  VAN  BEMMELEN,  at  Batavia,  has  recently  collected  all  the  existing 
determinations  of  the  lunar  magnetic  variation  for  different  stations,  and  has 
examined  this  material,  together  with  newly  computed  data  for  other  stations,  to  see 
whether  the  magnetic  field  which  produces  these  effects  has  a  potential,  and  whether 
the  latter  has  its  source  above  or  below  the  earth's  surface.J  He  finds  that  most  of 
the  field,  at  any  rate,  has  a  potential,  and  that  this  arises  partly  above  and  partly 
below  the  earth's  surface,  but  that  the  internal  field  is  too  great  to  be  merely  a 
secondary  induction  effect.  This  result  should  be  accepted  with  some  reserve,  at 
present,  not  only  on  account  of  the  imperfections  of  the  data,  but  also  because  the 
seasonal  change  of  the  variations  was  disregarded ;  in  certain  elements  at  some 
stations  the  summer  and  winter  variations  are  of  opposite  sign,  and  this  renders  it 
unsafe  to  take  the  mean  variation  for  the  whole  year.  At  many  stations, 
unfortunately,  the  data  so  far  computed  apply  only  to  the  whole  year,  so  that  if  this 
material  was  to  be  used,  no  course  was  possible  save  to  adopt  the  mean  of  the  year 
for  all  One  important  result  of  VAN  BEMMELEN'S  work  was  to  show  that  the 
principal  term  in  the  potential  of  the  lunar  variation  field  was  of  the  form  Q33  (in  the 
usual  language  of  harmonic  analysis,  a  tesseral  harmonic  of  the  second  kind  and  third 

*  SABINE,  '  Phil.  Trans.,'  1847 ;  '  Batavian  Observations,'  28  (1905). 

t  See  '  Trevandrum  Observations'  (BROUN),  vol.  I.,  p.  137,  and  SABINE'S  and  FIGEE'S  discussions 
already  cited 

t  '  Met.  Zeitschr.,1  May,  1912. 


EARTH'S   MAGNETISM  PRODUCED  BY  THE  MOON  AND  SUN. 

degree).  This  is  in  accordance  with  the  theory  that  the  lunar  atmospheric  tide  is  the 
main  cause  of  the  phenomenon,  although,  of  course,  it  does  not  prove  this  to  be 
the  case. 

§  6.  So  far  reference  has  been  made  entirely  to  the  lunar  variation  as  determined 
from  a  number  of  whole  lunations,  as  has  been  generally  done  (the  exceptions  are 
Trevandrum,  Bombay,  and  Batavia).  It  will  be  remembered  that  SCHUSTER'S  theory 
of  the  solar  diurnal  variation  involved  the  hypothesis  of  a  variable  conductivity 
depending  on  the  sun's  hour  angle.  This  should,  of  course,  also  affect  the  electric 
currents  which  arise  from  the  lunar  atmospheric  tide,  and  so  make  the  lunar  magnetic 
variations  depend  on  the  sun  as  well  as  on  the  moon.  In  the  course  of  a  lunation, 
however,  the  angle  between  the  sun  and  moon,  viewed  from  the  earth,  changes  from 
0  to  2-jr,  and  the  mean  lunar  variation  for  such  a  period  cannot  be  expected  to  show 
any  special  dependence  on  solar  time.  At  any  particular  lunar  phase,  however,  the 
solar  day  hours,  during  which  (over  a  given  part  of  the  earth)  the  atmospheric 
conductivity  is  greatest,  occur  at  a  definite  part  of  the  lunar  day,  this  part  changing 
with  the  lunar  phase ;  and  it  has,  in  fact,  been  found*  that  the  lunar  variation 
determined  from  the  mean  of  a  number  of  days  all  at  the  same  lunar  phase  is  not  of 
the  semi-diurnal  form.  The  variation  curve  goes  through  a  regular  cycle  of  change 
with  lunar  phase,  in  such  a  manner  as  to  leave  the  mean  variation  over  a  whole 
lunation  of  the  simple  form  already  described.  The  magnetic  needle  is  most  mobile 
during  the  day  hours :  at  certain  seasons  of  the  year,  BROUN  found  that  the 
amplitude  of  the  lunar  diurnal  variation  of  magnetic  declination  at  Trevandrum  was 
five  times  as  great  during  the  solar  day  hours  as  during  the  night  hours. t  These 
facts  clearly  show  that  the  conductivity  of  the  medium  in  which  the  electric  currents 
flow  to  produce  the  lunar  magnetic  variation  depends  on  the  position  of  the  sun  ;  and 
since  it  is  unreasonable  to  suppose  that  the  mechanisms  concerned  in  producing 
the  lunar  and  solar  diurnal  magnetic  variations  are  materially  different,  the 
assumption  of  variable  conductivity  in  SCHUSTER'S  theory  is  confirmed  in  a  very 
definite  and  independent  way ;  in  SCHUSTER'S  discussion  two  barometric  oscillations, 
diurnal  and  semi-diurnal,  were  concerned,  and  it  was  necessary  to  explain  why  the 
resulting  magnetic  variations,  deduced  on  the  assumption  of  uniform  conductivity, 
did  not  bear  the  proper  ratio  to  one  another.  This  might  be  because  the  conductivity 
was  not  uniform,  or  because  the  ratio  of  the  two  oscillations  was  different  in  the 
upper  regions  of  the  atmosphere  from  that  indicated  by  the  barometer.  This  latter 
uncertainty  is  absent  in  the  case  of  the  lunar  variations,  where  there  is  only  a  single 
barometric  oscillation,  from  which  arise  magnetic  variations  of  other  periods, 
depending  on  the  solar  hour  angle. 

§  7.  In  order  to  examine  the  effect  of  this  variable  conductivity,  it  is  natural  to 
determine  the  harmonic  components  of  the  lunar  diurnal  variation  for  different  lunar 

*  By  BROUN,  CHAMBERS,  FIGEE,  and  Moos  in  the  investigations  already  cited, 
t  'Trevandrum  Observations,'  vol.  I.,  p.  121. 

2  o  2 


284  I  'If-  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 

phases,  but  (rather  strangely)  this  has  only  once  been  done  hitherto,  and  then 
without  result.*  CHAMBERS!  obtained  an  analytical  expression  for  the  variation  and 
its  dependence  on  phase,  which  satisfactorily  represents  the  observations,  but  it  is 
not  of  a  simple  character.  His  formula  was 


/,,(*.)  cos  2  +/..,*  sn 

where  h  is  the  hour  of  the  solar  day,  P  is  the  mean  period  of  a  lunation  in  solar  days, 
and  t  is  the  age  of  the  moon  in  solar  days;  fe.2(h)  and  f,,2(h)  are  the  observed 
variations  at  new  moon  and  one-eighth  phase  respectively.  This  formula,  it  will  be 
noticed,  expresses  the  lunar  variation  as,  in  reality,  a  solar  diurnal  variation  (h,  the 
solar  time,  being  the  variable)  which  merely  runs  through  a  cycle  of  change  depending 
oil  the  age  of  the  moon.  This,  in  fact,  was  CHAMBERS'  view  —  he  termed  the  variation 
"  luni-solar."  It  will  be  seen  later,  however,  that  there  is  a  true  lunar  semi-diurnal 
variation  which  remains  unchanged  throughout  the  course  of  ar  lunation,  as  well  as 
luni-solar  components  governed  by  the  position  of  both  bodies.  As  to  CHAMBERS' 
expression  for  the  variation,  while  it  is  numerically  correct,  it  does  not  aid  in 
interpreting  the  phenomenon,  because  it  depends  on  two  complex  curves  fc,-2(ti)  and 
f,,t(h\  for  which  no  analytical  expression  was  obtained;  these  two  curves  are  not 
independent,  as  will  appear  later. 

§  8.  FIOEE  determined  the  harmonic  coefficients  of  the  diurnal  and  semi-diurnal 
components  of  the  variation  at  each  lunar  phase,  and  came  to  the  conclusion  that  "  a 
regular  variation  of  the  movement  of  the  magnetic  needle  with  the  moon's  phases  is 
not  indicated  by  the  observations  at  Batavia."J  It  will  be  shown,  on  the  contrary, 
that  the  Batavian  observations  agree  with  those  made  at  other  places  in  manifesting 
considerable  regularity  of  change  with  lunar  phase. 

§  9.  Moos§  has  made  the  valuable  suggestion  that  the  luni-solar  variation  may  be 
regarded  as  a  simple  lunar  variation  the  amplitude  of  "  part  of  which  goes  through 
a  series  of  wave-like  changes  in  the  course  of  a  lunation."  He  multiplies  each  hourly 
value  of  the  mean  lunar  variation  determined  from  a  whole  month  by  1  +  cos  (t  +  »), 
where  t  is  the  lunar  time  reckoned  from  upper  culmination  (one  hour  equalling 
15°),  and  v  is  the  angular  measure  of  the  moon's  age,  reckoned  as  0°  at  new  moon,  and 
changing  through  360°  in  the  course  of  a  month.  Curves  showing  the  results  of  this 
calculation  are  exhibited  for  comparison  with  the  observed  curves,  for  the  eight  lunar 
phases,  for  the  element  of  declination.  The  general  similarity  of  the  two  sets  of 
curves  is  sufficiently  striking  to  show  that  the  suggestion  is  in  the  right  direction. 
It  will  be  seen  that  this  idea  is,  formally,  much  akin  to  SCHUSTER'S  idea  of  variable 

*  '  Batavian  Observations,'  XXVI.,  Appendix,  p.  195,  §44. 

t  CHAMBERS,  'Phil.  Trans.,'  A,  vol.  178  (1887). 

t  '  Batavian  Observations,'  XXVL,  Appendix,  §  44. 

§   'Bombay  Magnetical  Observations,'  1846-1905,  vol.  II.,  §526. 


KAUTH'S   MAGNETISM  PRODUCED  BY  THE  MOON  AND  SUN.  2B5 

conductivity,  and  is  most  naturally  interpreted  in  that  way.  Moos,  however,  seems 
in  >t  to  have  thought  of  the  matter  in  this  simple  light,  hut  speaks  of  changes  in  the 
radio-activity  of  the,  earth's  crust,  due  to  a  tidal  action,  as  possibly  responsible  for  the 
luni-solar  changes,  perhaps  by  ionizing  the  atmosphere  indirectly;  and  also  of  the 
reflection  by  the  moon  of  ionizing  radiation  from  the  sun.* 

§  10.  Since  the  mean  variation   of  any  element  over  a  whole  lunation  is  almost 
exactly  a  semi-diurnal  wave,  Moos'tf  expression  is  equivalent  to 


'2  COS  (2<-M0)[l  +  COS  (<  +  •;)]  =  C08(t  +  t0-»)+2cOB(2t  +  t0)  +  C08(3t  +  t0  +  v),      .       (A) 

though  he  did  not  himself  write  it  out  formally  thus.  The  examination  of  the  data 
by  harmonic  analysis,  which  is  effected  in  the  third  part  of  this  paper,  is  the  best 
means  of  numerically  testing  Moos's  suggestion,  being  preferable  to  a  mere  comparison 
of  two  sets  of  curves  by  eye.  The  desire  to  apply  this  test  partly  occasioned  the 
present  re-examination  of  the  existing  data,  which  also  has  in  view  the  comparison 
of  the  results  of  these  past  determinations  of  the  lunar  magnetic  variation  (on  which 
enormous  lalxnir  has  been  spent)  to  see  how  far  they  confirm  one  another,  and  gauge 
the  possibility  of  obtaining  accurate  information  from  them. 

Moos's  suggestion  implies  the  presence,  in  the  lunar  diurnal  variation  at  a 
particular  lunar  phase,  of  first  and  third  harmo'nic  components  of  amplitude  equal 
to  half  that  of  the  semi-diurnal  component,  and  with  phase  angles  which  respectively 
decrease  and  increase  by  45°  with  each  change  of  lunar  phase,  the  epoch  of  the 
second  component  remaining  constant.  No  other  relations  or  components  would 
satisfy  the  above  equation. 

§11.  The  calculations  from  the  observational  data  show  that  while  first  and  third 
harmonic  components  possessing  the  alxrve  phase  relations  are  present,  the  amplitudes 
are  not  generally  in  accordance  with  Moos's  equation.  Moreover,  a  fourth  harmonic 
component,  which  was  calculated  in  the  first  instance  merely  because  to  do  so  involved 
scarcely  any  trouble  after  the  other  components  had  been  computed,  was  also  found 
to  be  present,  of  quite  appreciable  amount,  and  obeying  an  unexpected  phase  law  ; 
its  phase  angle  increases  during  each  lunation  by  4?r,  twice  the  amount  of  change  in 
the  phases  of  the  first  and  third  components. 

There  is  considerable  accidental  error  in  the  determinations  of  the  phase  angles  and 
amplitudes  at  each  lunar  phase,  as,  of  course,  the  material  is  much  subdivided.  While, 
however,  the  phase  angles  go  through  an  easily  recognizable  monthly  cycle,  the 
amplitudes  show  no  regular  variation  with  lunar  phase  (the  mean  of  a  number  of 
lunations  is  dealt  with,  of  course,  so  that  perigee  and  apogee  occur  at  different  phases 
during  the  period).  The  mean  of  the  amplitudes  at  the  separate  phases  gives, 
therefore,  the  best  determination  of  the  amplitudes  of  the  first,  third,  and  fourth 

*  'Bombay  Magnetical  Observations,'  1846-1905,  vol.  II.,  §527.  It  may  be  mentioned  that  earlier 
investigators  had  regarded  the  lunar  variations  as  possibly  due  to  the  direct  or  indirect  action  of  induced 
magnetism  in  the  moon,  arising  from  solar  or  terrestrial  magnetism,  or  both. 


286  DR.  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 

components,  as  well  as  of  the  second  ;  and  similarly,  by  correcting  the  separate  phase 
angles  by  the  amount  indicated  by  the  regular  phase  law,  and  taking  their  mean,  the 
accidental  error  of  the  determined  phase  angle  at  any  particular  lunar  phase  can  >>e 
much  reduced.  In  this  way,  as  described  more  fully  in  §  27,  the  expression  of  the 
lunar  variation  at  every  period  of  the  lunation,  complete  as  far  as  the  fourth  harmonic 
term,  is  obtained.  It  is  found  that  the  amplitudes  of  the  first  and  third  harmonics 
are  often  unequal  ;  sometimes  their  amplitude  exceeds  that  of  the  second  component, 
but  generally  they  are  less,  down  to  about  half  this  amount.  The  determined  values 
of  C  and  ta  in  the  formula 


C,  cos^-Ko'-^  +  C,  cos  (2«  +  £0")  +  Q»cos  (S«  +  <o/"  +  ")  +  C4cos  (4t  +  t0""  +  2»),      (B) 


which  has  been  found  to  fit  the  observations,  are  given  in  Tables  XL,  XII.,  and  XIII. 
for  all  the  stations  and  elements  for  which  data  were  available.  Moos's  representation, 
it  is  seen,  though  it  pointed  in  the  right  direction,  is  of  too  simple  a  character  to 
represent  the  phenomenon  ;  the  solar  excitation  which  it  indicates  is  a  matter  which 
concerns  the  whole  earth,  and  this  action  cannot  be  represented  by  a  simple  harmonic 
factor  at  each  individual  station. 

§  12.  SCHTJSTKR*  has  calculated  the  effect  of  an  atmospheric  oscillation  with  a 
velocity  potential  Q/  (which  is  also  the  main  component  of  a  lunar  diurnal  tide)t  in 
producing,  under  the  influence  of  a  variable  conductivity  of  amount 

P  =  A>(l+ycoso>),  y£l 

(where  a  is  the  zenith  distance  of  the  sun  from  each  particular  point  on  the  earth's 
surface),  magnetic  variations  of  one,  two,  three  and  more  periods  in  the  solar  day. 
Adopting  the  rather  more  general  expression 

p  =  A,[l+y'  cos  0+y  sin0  cos  (X  +  «)]  ........     (C) 


where  B  is  the  colatitude,  X  is  the  longitude,  and  \  +  t  is  the  local  time,  he  finds  that 
the  resulting  magnetic  potential  (apart  from  a  constant  factor)  is  of  the  form 


},    .    (D) 

where  QWT  sin  {T(\  +  t)-a}  is  the  velocity  potential.  The  coefficients  p'  and  qn"  are 
numerical  constants  which  depend  on  v  and  „'  ;  their  values  are  tabulated  in  the  paper 
referred  to. 

b  is  shown  in  Part  II.  of  the  present  paper  that  the  above  equation  (D)  holds 
good,  whatever  be  the  functional  relation  between  P  and  «,  and  this  calculation  is 

*  'Phil.  Trans.,'  A,  vol.  208,  p.  163. 

t  Q»'  represent*  the  tesseral  function  sin'  Od'PJdv.  where  P«  is  the  zonal  harmonic  of  degree  n. 

O 


EARTH'S  MAGNETISM   PRODUCED  BY  THE  MOON  AND  SUN.  287 

adapted,  in  J;  L':;.  |.>  n,\  t-r  t  In-  case  ..('  t  In-  luiii  solar  ina^m-t  ic  \  ariat  inn*.  It  istlirn- 
shown  that  the  equivalent  expression  to  (I>)  is  in  thin  case  (apart  from  a  constant 
factor) 


This  expression,  it  should  be  noticed,  consists  of  series  of  harmonic  components  of 
one,  two,  three,  and  more  periods  in  the  lunar  day,  with  phase  angles  which  depend 
on  the  age  of  the  moon.  In  the  second  series  the  phase  angles  increase  by  2  (<r+2)  •* 
per  lunation  ;  this  phase  change  is  very  rapid,  even  for  the  diurnal  term,  and  with  the 
lunation  divided  up  into  not  more  than  eight  parts,  hardly  comes  within  the  range  of 
observation,  even  if  the  coefficients  q*  were  of  the  same  order  of  magnitude  as  the 
p£  coefficients.  The  theoretical  values  of  qm'  are,  however,  much  less  than  those  of 
the  important  members  of  the  pn'  set  of  coefficients,  and  therefore  this  part  of  the 
magnetic  potential  can  be  neglected.  The  other  part  consists  of  terms  of  period  2iw, 
whose  phase  angles  increase  by  2  (a-—  2)  IT  per  lunation  ;  thus  the  phase  of  the  first 
harmonic  decreases  by  2-ir  each  lunation,  that  of  the  second  component  remains 
constant,  while  the  third,  fourth,  and  higher  components  increase  by  amounts  2ir,  4ir, 
6-r,  and  so  on.  This,  however,  is  exactly  the  law  of  phase  change  which  is  indicated 
by  the  formula  (B),  whicli  was  determined  empirically  from  the  observations. 

At  new  moon,  when  v  =  0,  the  formula  indicates  that  all  the  harmonic  components 
should  have  the  same  phase  angle,  or  differ  by  180  degrees  exactly  (since  the 
coefficients  may  be  of  different  sign).  The  data  obtained  in  this  paper  show  a  very 
satisfactory  agreement  with  this  conclusion,  when  the  extreme  smallness  of  the  whole 
phenomenon  is  considered. 

§  13.  The  amplitudes  must  next  be  considered.  The  actual  calculations  necessary 
for  the  comparison  of  theory  and  observation  are  given  in  §  25,  and  only  the  results 
obtained  will  be  cited  here.  It  appears  that  as  regards  the  relative  magnitudes  of 
the  first  three  components  in  the  lunar  variation,  there  is  tolerably  good  agreement 
with  the  results  derived  either  from  SCHUSTER'S  simple  theory  p/pi  =  l  +  cosw,  or 
from  the  more  general  theory  of  Part  II.  of  this  paper.  The  numerical  constants 
(p/p<>=  1  +  3  cos  o>  +  Jco8*w)  might  be  altered  to  fit  the  observations  better,  but  it 
seems  hardly  worth  while  to  do  this  till  better  observational  material,,  is  available. 
The  given  constants  were  chosen  to  represent  a  function  which  should  have  a  large 
maximum  at  midday,  and  should  be  small  and  nearly  constant  during  the  night 
hours. 

§  J  4.  The  deciding  factor  between  the  two  expressions  for  pfp^  is  found  to  be  the 
amplitude  of  the  fourth  harmonic  component.  Three  tables  are  given  in  §25  to 
illustrate  this.  They  give  the  ratio  of  the  amplitudes  of  the  four  harmonic  compo- 
nrtits  to  that  of  the  second  component,  for  the  three  elements  X,  Y,  Z.  The  first 


288  DR.  8.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 

table  is  that  calculated  on  the  hypothesis  />//>„  =  1+cosw,  the  second  that  calculated 
tV.iin  p/pt  =  l+3co8a>+f  cosaw,  and  the  third  gives  the  observed  values.  The  simple 
f  or  1  1  1  of/>  gives  altogether  too  small  a  value  for  GjCa,  while  the  second  expression  for 
p  gives  values  of  the  right  order,  at  any  rate.  Perhaps  the  detailed  calculations 
in  Part  II.  have  not  been  carried  to  a  sufficient  degree  of  approximation,  as  the 
expressions  for  p'  do  not  converge  very  rapidly.  When  better  data  are  available, 
this  point  must  receive  consideration.  Enough  evidence,  however,  has  been  brought 
forward  to  show  that  the  fourth  harmonic  component  of  the  lunar  variation  favours 
the  hypothesis  that  the  conductivity  during  the  night  hours  is  small  compared  with 
its  value  during  the  daytime,*  and  that  the  rate  of  recombination  of  ions  in  the 
upper  atmosphere  (assuming  this  to  be  the  seat  of  the  effect)  is  rapid,  as  would 
naturally  be  expected. 

The  proper  discussion  of  the  observations,  whether  of  the  lunar  or  solar  magnetic 
variations,  can  only  be  made  on  the  basis  of  a  reliable  determination  of  the  numerical 
coefficients  of  the  various  tesseral  harmonics  in  the  potential,  derived  from  a  number 
of  observatories  properly  distributed  over  the  globe.  The  significance  of  the  lower 
harmonics  in  the  lunar  variation  makes  it  desirable  to  obtain  the  terms  in  the 
potential  down  to  those  of  the  fourth  type  (Qn4)  —  not  only  for  the  lunar  variation, 
but  also  for  the  solar  variation  ;  its  fourth  harmonic  shows  a  sufficient  degree  of 
constancy,  at  most  observatories,  to  entitle  it  to  respect  as  having  definite  physical 
significance. 

PART  II.  —  Mathematical  Theory. 

§  15.  The  problem  in  hand  is  to  determine  the  current  function  of  the  electric 
currents  induced  in  a  spherical  shell  of  fluid  by  its  quasi-tidal  motion  across  a  radial 
magnetic  field  of  force,  the  electric  conductivity  of  the  fluid  at  any  point  being  a 
known  function  of  the  angular  distance  between  that  point  and  another  (that  with 
the  sun  at  its  zenith)  which  uniformly  rotates  round  the  axis  of  the  sphere.  The 
velocity  potential  t/r  of  the  motion  will  be  expressed  as  the  sum  of  a  number  of  terms 
such  as 


where  Q_T  is  a  surface  harmonic  of  degree  m  and  type  T,  and  X  is  the  longitude 
measured  towards  the  east  from  some  standard  meridian,  at  which  the  local  time  is  t. 
The  colatitude  and  zenith  distance  of  the  sun  will  be  denoted  by  6  and  o>  respectively  ; 

*  It  is  not  aaserted  that  any  observational  evidence  has  been  brought  forward  in  favour  of  the  particular 

numerical  constants  here  chosen  for  P,  but  only  that  the  observations  indicate  the  presence  of  an 

ible  term  in  P  depending  on  cos  2o>,  and  that  this  term,  if  present,  may  be  expected,  on  general 

physical  grounds,  to  be  of  such  a  sign  as  to  diminish  the  value  of  P  at  night  as  compared  with  the  value 

by  day.—  June  11,  1913. 


MAONI-TISM    PRODUCED  BY  THE   MOON  AND  SUN.  289 


if  <f  is  the  dtvlinutinn  of  the  sun,  ev'ulmtly  we  have 

cos«  =  sin  &  cos  6+  cos  tJsin 


\vliriv 

x  =  sin  S  cos  0,        1y  =  cos  ^  sin  0,        /u  =  cos  (\  +  1). 

The  conductivity  and  resistivity  at  the  point  (0,  \)  will  be  denoted  by  p  and  «' 
respectively,  p«'  being,  of  course,  equal  to  unity.  For  the  present  we  shall  suppose 
that  p  and  /  are  finite  and  continuous  functions  of  to,  so  that  they  can  be  expressed 
as  FOURIER'S  series  in  cos  nu>  over  the  range  0,  v  ;  p  will  certainly  satisfy  this 
condition,  and  the  case  of  p  =  0,  K  =  °°  will  be  considered  later.  Further,  it  will  be 
assumed  possible  to  express  K'  as  a  TAYLOR'S  series  in  cos  w,  and  it  is  in  this  form  that 
we  shall  suppose  the  resistivity  to  be  given,  as  one  of  the  data  of  the  problem. 
Theoretically  this  is  a  limitation  of  the  problem,  as  there  are  some  functions  which 
cannot  be  expressed  in  the  form  stated  ;  for  instance,  if  the  conductivity  were 
proportional  to  cosco  in  that  hemisphere  on  which  the  sun  is  shining,  and  zero  or 
constant  over  the  other  hemisphere,  K'  could  not  be  so  expressed.  But  in  reality 
nothing  of  value  is  lost,  as  any  continuous  function  can  be  approximately  expressed 
in  the  form  of  a  TAYLOR'S  series  to  any  desired  degree  of  accuracy. 

[Some  further  explanation  of  this  use  of  series  may  be  desirable.  The  series  used 
in  the  analysis  are  all  written  as  infinite  ones,  for  the  sake  of  formal  simplicity  and 
theoretical  completeness.  In  the  detailed  execution  of  the  work,  however,  only  a 
finite  number  of  these  terms  can  be  utilized,  as  workable  general  expressions  for  the 
coefficients  in  the  current  function  II  cannot  be  obtained.  The  actual  procedure, 
therefore,  must  be  to  take  a  finite  number  of  terms  of  the  FOURIER'S  series  for  />, 
transform  this  into  a  polynomial  in  cos  u>  (this  also,  of  course,  will  have  only  a  finite 
number  of  terms),  and  work  out  the  coefficients  of  R  in  terms  of  the  coefficients  of 
this  polynomial  to  as  great  a  degree  of  accuracy  as  is  practicable  and  desirable. 
This  is  the  course  of  the  work  in  §§  18-20,  where  the  terms  (a  +  b  cos  u>  +  c  cos  2o>)  of 
the  FOURIER'S  series  for  p  are  taken,  and  the  expression  for  R  is  worked  out  as  far  as 
concerns  the  terms  in  a,  b,  />",  and  c.  The  resistivity  ifp  is  introduced  into  the 
calculations  for  purely  mathematical  reasons,  on  account  of  certain  analytical 
advantages  which  it  seems  to  offer.  The  results  obtained  in  this  way,  in  terms  of 
the  coefficients  of  p,  might  be  got  otherwise  by  an  extension  of  the  method  used  by 
SCHUSTER.  This  identity  of  results  is  clear  from  the  fact  that  if  the  FOURIER 
coefficients  of  p  are  small  enough  the  TAYLOR'S  series  for  l/p  is  absolutely  convergent, 
and  the  legitimacy  of  the  use  of  l/p  is  in  this  case  immediately  evident  ;  the  formal 
results,  however,  do  not  depend  on  any  property  of  convergence,  so  that  the  results 
obtained  by  using  l/p  remain  equally  valid  with  those  obtained  in  any  other  way, 
even  though  the  series  for  l/p  should  become  non-convergent.  This  is  one  of  many 
instances  in  which  it  is  possible  and  advantageous  to  use  expressions  which  may 

VOL.  ccxin.  —  A.  •_'  i1 


290  DR.  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THK 

become  non-convergent  to  obtain  results  which  can  be  got  less  simply  in  other  ways. 
Whether  the  final  result  is  convergent  depends  in  this  case  only  on  p,  and  not  on  tl  it- 
processes  of  analysis  used  to  deduce  II  from  p.  —  Added  June  11,  1913.] 
We  shall  write,  therefore, 

00 

K  =  Cae  2  df  cos7*  <D,         =  COCK, 


o 


where  C,  e,  and  a  are  constants  (introduced  for  convenience)  whose  meaning  will  be 
explained  later,  and  the  coefficients  dp  are  given  numbers.  Expanding  cosp  w  in  terms 
of  n,  we  have 


where 

0> 

and  (since 

2*~V*  =  2m~1cosra(x  +  «)  =  co8m(\  +  t) 
fp  is  given  (for  jo  =  0)  by 

00 

/,=  s 

4  =  0 

B> 

Here  we  have  written 

In  virtue  of  the  definitions  of  ep  and  apq,  we  have 


Next  we  consider  the  differential  coefficients  of  *.     We  have 


~ 


We  shall  write  ff  for       ;  evidently  we  have 


cos  -  sn 


D 


KARTH'S  MAGNTTISM    PRODUCED  BY  THE  MOON  AND  SUN.  291 

!;  li!.  Following  SCHUSTER'S  notation  and  treatment,  the  earth  will  be  regarded  as 
;i  uniformly  magnetized  sphere  of  radius  «,  whose  magnetic  potential  may  be  resolved 
into  the  zonal  harmonic  of  the  first  degree  and  the  tesseral  harmonic  of  the  first  degree 
.ind  type.  The  former  harmonic  is  much  the  larger  of  the  two,  as  the  inclination  (0) 
of  the  magnetic  to  the  geographical  Jixis  is  small.  The  radial  force  can  be  expressed  as 

V  =  C  cos  ti  +  G  tan  0  sin  6  cos  X, 

where  C  is  a  constant  not  differing  much  from  —  $  (the  force  being  measured  positive 
outwards),  and  X  is  now  the  longitude  measured  from  the  meridian  (68°  31'  west  of 
Greenwich)  containing  the  magnetic  axis. 

The  components  of  electric  force,  X  and  Y,  measured  towards  the  south  and  east 
respectively,  are 

Xa  =  -. 

am  0 

\js  being  the  velocity  potential. 

If  we  express  X  and  Y  in  the  form 


dS     J     dli  dS 


x  =  y_ 

~  ' 


dd      e  sin  0  d\  '  siu  6  d\      e  dd  ' 

where  K  is  the  known  resistivity  and  e  the  thickness  of  the  conducting  atmospheric 
shell,  the  function  R  will  be  the  current  function  of  the  electric  currents  produced  by 
X  and  Y  (neglecting  electric  inertia).  The  function  S  is  the  potential  of  a  system  of 
electric  forces  which  in  the  steady  state  are  balanced  by  a  static  distribution  of 
electricity  revolving  round  the  earth,  and  causing  a  variation  in  the  electrostatic 
potential  which  is  found  to  be  too  weak  to  affect  our  instruments. 
To  determine  R  we  shall  eliminate  S,  thus  obtaining  the  equation 


dx    deV      "/-BinedxVdx/1  de 

Instead  of  using  the  resistivity  it',  SCHUSTER  worked  with  the  conductivity  p  (using 
the  special  form  1  +  k  cos  w),  in  order  to  avoid  the  difficulties  introduced  by  "  the  high 
and  possibly  infinite  values  which  K  would  take  when  the  conductivity  sinks  low  or 
vanishes."*  These  difficulties,  however,  are  found  not  to  be  serious,  and  the  work 
is  greatly  simplified  by  the  use  of  K,  which  enables  R  to  be  determined  directly, 
without  first  evaluating  S,  as  is  necessary  when  p  is  kept  as  the  variable  quantity. 
The  investigation  can  also  be  made  much  more  general,  without  formal  complexity, 
when  K'  is  used. 

*  SCHUSTER,  'Phil.  Trans.,'  A,  vol.  208,  p.  190. 
2  P  2 


292  DR-  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 


lini,'  tin-  i-xpressions  for  X,  Y  in  terms  of  the  velocity  potential  \Js,  the  left- 
hand  side  of  the  last  equation,  after  division  by  Ga  sin  6,  may  be  written* 


— 
27»+l 


2(2m  +  l) 

+  {-  (m-1)  (ro+  1)  (ro  +  r)  (ro  +  r-l)  Q,,,-!7-1 


The  right-hand  side  of  our  equation  for  R,  after  division  by  Ga  sin  0,  becomes 
equal  to 

K    !  d*  ad        a  d 

^     ysl  y 


We  suppose  R  to  be  expressed  as  the  sum  of  a  number  of  tesseral  harmonics 
pH"tyn°  sin  (o-V—  a'),  where  pn"  is  a  numerical  coefficient,  X'  has  been  written  for  X  +  £, 
and  &  i^anges  (possibly)  from  —  oo  to  +00.  The  contribution  of  each  such  term  to  the 
total  value  of  the  last  expression  is  easily  seen  to  be  the  product  ofpn"  into 

-n  (n+  1)  Q/  sin  (erX'-a')  {/„  +  22/p  cosj>X'}, 


where  we  have  inserted  the  values  of  K  and  its  differential  coefficients,  and  have 
transformed  the  first  line  by  means  of  LAPLACE'S  equation 


iSo  far  ff  and  fp  have  been  defined  only  for  positive  and  zero  values  of  p  ;  we  now 
extend  the  definition  by  the  equations 

JP     J  -pi        J  p  =  j  -p- 
*  Ibid.,  pp.  188,  189. 


EARTH'S  MAGNETISM   PRODUCED  BY  THE  MOON  AND  SUN.  _'.'  , 

This  enables  us  to  write  expression  (3)  in  the  form 


=    2    Il/(/>)sm(<r+jo.\'-a'), 
where 

R/(p)  =  (-n(n  +  l)  Q/-«?9£k+. 


Whenp  is  positive,  substituting  our  expressions  for/p  and/',,  we  timl 


/(p)  =  2 

q  =  0 


*  r/O  ff 

2  (p  +  2?)  «,,7^  .  £  cos  ,*  cos  0  ^  .  JT1, 


fl  =  0 

/C080^--^,)+g 


Since,  in  the  original  equation  for  R,*(/)),  a  change  in  the  sign  of  p  only  affects  the 
term  <rQn'/sin  8  in  the  first  term,  from  our  last  expression  we  may  at  once  write  down 
the  value  of  B.*(—  jo),  p  being  positive,  by  changing  the  sign  of  (rQ.'/sin  6.  Thus, 


§  17.  For  convenience  and  clearness,  some  well-known  formulae  of  transformation 
will  now  be  set  down.     These  have  been  much  used  by  SCHUSTER  in  his  papers,  and 


294  OR-  8.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIUKNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 

the  equations,  and  some  formulae  derived  from  them,  will  be  denoted  by  the  same 
Roman  letters  which  lie  uses.* 

i<r  .........  (A) 


=  (n+<r)(»+a-l)Q._1*-1-(n-«r+2){»-«-H)Qt+1(r-»i  (C) 

1'+1)      ......  (D) 


81110 

1'-1,     .    .    .    .    .   (E) 
.    .    (F) 


sin 

+  (w+  1)  (n  +  cr)  (w  +  o—  1)  Q,,,/-1}, 


Making  use  of  these  equations,  we  obtain  the  following  expressions  :— 


In  II.'  (—  p),  the  second  term  remains  the  same,  while  the  expression  in  square 
brackets  in  the  first  term  becomes 


These  expressions  for  RB*  (  ±p)  are  of  the  type 


Now  by  equations  (B)  and  (C),  it  is  evident  that  Q/+  V~l,  Q/'V'1,  and  Q/y'  can 
be  expressed  as  the  sum  of  a  number  of  tesseral  harmonics  all  of  type  <r+p  or  all 
of  type  <r-p  (at  will),  and  of  degrees  ranging,  by  steps  of  2,  from  v±(p-l), 
v±(p-l)  and  f±p  respectively.  Further  multiplication  by  y*  can  be  so  arranged  as 


*  Ibid.,  pp.  187-189. 


r.AKTII'S   MACNKT1SM    I'KODITKD  BY  THE  MOON  AND  SUN.  295 

to  leave  the  type  unchanged,  while  extending  the  range  of  the  degrees  by  4q.  Also 
by  equation  (A),  the  coefficient  a,  which,  it  will  be  remembered,  is  a  power  series  in 
cos  0,  leaves  the  type  unchanged  while  it  increases  the  range  of  the  degrees  of  the 
resulting  tesseral  harmonics.  In  every  case,  therefore  (p  positive  or  negative),  It/ 
can  be  expressed  as  the  sum  of  a  number  of  terms  such  as  Q,**'.  Therefore  if  we 
write  ^  for  the  sum  of  all  the  expressions  (2)  resulting  from  each  term  QmT  sin  (T\'— a) 
in  the  velocity  potential  \}s,  the  fundamental  equation  (l)  for  R  takes  the  form 

(4)  ^  =     2     {  2  kn'-pQn'*f  sin  (<r+p  .  \'— a')}, 

where  kn''p  is  a  coefficient  whose  value  can  be  determined  in  terms  of  pn*  and  the 
coefficients dp  in  the  TAYLOR'S  series  for  K.  By  equating  the  coefficients  of  harmonics 
of  the  same  degree  and  type,  on  the  two  sides  of  the  equation,  we  obtain  equations 
to  determine  the  coefficient  pm'  in  terms  of  the  dp»  and  the  known  constants  of 
the  velocity  potential.  In  practice  this  must  be  done  by  a  process  of  successive 
approximation.  Knowing,  from  the  form  of  the  above  equation,  which  is  linear  in 
p"  and  dp,  that  every  coefficient  p,"  can  be  expressed  as  a  TAYLOR'S  series  in 

-^ ,  -^ ,  -j2 ,  and  so  on,  we  can  determine  this  series  by  successively  assuming  that 

all  save  one  particular  variable  -f  are  zero,  and  considering  this  variable  alone,  it 

may  easily  l>e  seen  that  the  phase  angle  of  every  term  in  R  arising  from  a  particular 
term  in  Sk  is  the  same  as  that  of  the  latter. 

§  18.  SCHUSTER  has  worked  out  the  values  of  pn'  for  the  special  form  of  conductivity 
already  mentioned,  and  for  the  two  terms  Q,1  sin  (\'— a)  and  Q/sin(2\'— a)  in  the 
velocity  potential,  to  the  fourth  order  of  approximation,  and  he  finds  that  the 
numerical  coefficients  of  the  terms  are  such  that  only  the  first  order  term  (depending, 
in  our  notation,  on  dt/da)  are  large  enough  to  be  detectable  by  olwervation.  The 
present  calculation  will  not  be  carried  so  far,  therefore,  and  will  not  include  terms  of 
higher  order  than  d.Jd0  or  (di/d0)3.  Also,  since  in  the  expression  for  ^  the  term 
depending  on  the  inclination  of  the  magnetic  to  the  geographical  axis  is  multiplied 
by  the  small  factor  tan  <f>,  the  part  of  It  depending  on  this  term  will  only  be  calculated 
as  far  as  the  first  order  dtfd0.  Further,  since  the  actual  atmospheric  oscillations  seem 
to  be  mainly  performed  in  the  simplest  mode  possible,  so  that  m  =  r  for  the  principal 
terms,  the  second  order  terms  will  be  neglected  for  the  smaller  harmonics  in  the 
velocity  potential  \js,  for  which  in  ^  T. 

We  therefore  consider  the  terms  in  R  which  depend  upon  a  term  AM'TQmT  in  "b, 
where  m'  and  r  are  quite  general,  except  that  in  the  terms  depending  on  d-Jd^  we 
shall  suppose  m'  =  r'+l  (since  Q,/  =  0  when  T  >  m',  the  term  in  (2)  depending  on 
Q*-iT  vanishes  when  m  =  r). 

It  will  first  be  necessary  to  write  out  the  developed  expressions  for  R/(o), 
R/(±l)>  IV (±2)  as  far  as  the  terms  in  da.  No  other  values  of  p  in  R,*(p)  give 


296  DR.  S.  CHAPNfAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 

terms  containing  dtt>  d»  d*     It  is  convenient  to  write  down  first  of  all  the  values  of 
/„,/„/„/'«./'.,  A  omitting  d,  and  higher  terms. 


cos  S  cos  0-el  sin  ^  sin  6, 
fi  =  &i  cos  S  cos  0-2e^  sin  ^  sin  6, 
fa  =  e^  cos  S  cos  0. 


R/(0)=  -n 


Q/].      ' 

As  already  stated,  in  the  last  two  lines  we  have  substituted  a-  =  n—  I  in  working 
out  the  numerical  coefficients,  as  also  in  all  other  terms  with  d2  as  factor. 


w  , 

n(n+8)(2n-l)(n-l) 

+  3  (n-  ij  !(n-2)  (»+  1)  (2n+  1)}  Q/ 


If    in   the    above    expressions   the   term    Q,,-1    occurs,    it   may    be    replaced   by 


EARTH'S   MAGNETISM    PRODUCED   BY   THE   MOON   AND  SUN. 


•297 


§  li).  Consider  now  the  terms  .-irising  ('nun  a  term  AJ..TQm.T'  sin  (r'X'—ct)  in  >k.  The 
only  term  of  corresponding  type  involving  da,  on  the  right-hand  side  of  equation  (4), 
\\hich  does  not  vanish,  is 

-pjm'  (m'+  1 )  d&S  sin  (r'X'-a'). 


Consequently,  to  order 


1>        


,     and     of  =  a, 


and  no  other  term  is  of  order  l/d0.  Next,  taking  terms  of  order  d,/o?0,  it  is  evident 
that  these  can  only  arise  from  ~Rm-T  (0),  Rm-T  (±l),  which  involve  d1Qm'±,'/,  C^Q-»*i*'*1. 
Eqtiating  the  sum  of  the  coefficients  of  the  terms  containing  these  harmonics,  with 
factors  d0  and  dl}  to  zero,  we  get  the  following  general  expressions  for  pm'±/,  pm'±\*1, 
to  order  dt/da  :  — 


(5) 


T  _ 


PM'~I 


/i  sin  S    m'  (m'—r'+l) 
da      (m' 


ro'(2ro'+l) 


Pm 


i  cos  S 


m' 


m'+l 


V', 


'     I      1    \   tCl^l     I      1  \  P"'      ' 


T-_,       _  i  dl  cos  3  (mr  +  1  )  (mf  +  r)  (m'  +r'-l)      T 
*  '/  /( 


If  the  type  of  any  of  these  coefficients  exceeds  the  degree,  it  must  be  set  equal  to 
zero.  No  other  terms  are  of  order  djd^. 

So  far  no  restriction  has  been  placed  on  m'  and  T.  In  making  a  further  approxima- 
tion, we  shall  not  write  out  general  expressions,  but  shall  consider  the  effect  of  the 
second  order  terms  (d.Jd0  and  df/df)  on  two  specific  terms  in  the  velocity  potential 
of  the  atmosphere,  viz.,  Q,1  sin  (\'—  a,)  and  Q23  sin  (2\'—  04),  which  give  rise  in  ^ 
to  terms 

-Q^sinx'-a,       and      -'« 


The  terms  of  the  proper  order  on  the  right-hand  side  of  (4)  are  (a)  those  involving  d.t 
from  Rm.T'(±2),  and  (b)  those  involving  df/dj  from  Kw±1'  (p)  and  Rm.41T'*'  (p) 
where  p  =  0,  ±1. 

VOL.  ccxill.  —  A.  2  q 


DR  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 

Considering  the  diurnal  variation  first,  the  terras  (a)  are  found,  from  the  formulas 
at  the  foot  of  p.  296,  to  be 

)<W  [W-13Q,1)  cos2  S  sin  (X'-«1)-(12Q41+  16Qa')  sin2  S  sin  (x'-a,) 

-{(4Q4'+3Q33)  sin  (2X'-a1)-(48Q10-6Q2°)  sin  (-a,)}  sin  S  cos  S 
-£Q<3  cos"  Jain  (3X'-a,)  +  3  (Q^-Qa1)  cos2  i  sin  (-X'-a,)], 

and  the  terms  (l>)  are 


MCMHQ/-  W)  sil1  (2X'-a,)  +  (  W-¥Q,°)  si"  (-«i)l  cos  i 

-(*W+  ¥Q.1)  sin  <*  sin  (x'-«0], 


sin  (2X'-ai)  +  Q2°  sin  (-"')}  cos  ^-Qs1  sin  <S  sin  (x'-a,)], 

'-aOl  cos  J 
Q22)  sin  S  sin  (2X'-a1)], 

21)  {sin  (X;-a,)  +  sin  (-X'-a,)}  cos  S 

2°)  sin  5  sin  (-a,)], 

i°^i[{-W  sin  (X'-a^-iQ,1  sin  (-X'-a,)}  cos  ^-2Q2°  sin  S  sin  (-a,)]. 

The  sum  of  the  coefficients  of  any  particular  term  Q/  sin  (o-X'-a^  in  the  above, 
must  be  equated  with  pn'n  (n  +  1  )  Q."  sin  (o-X'  -  a,).  The  values  of  p.'  thus  calculated 
are  given  in  Table  I.  It  should  be  remarked  that  Q^1  has  been  replaced  by 
-Qn/n(n  +  l),  and  the  coefficient  of  Q,1  sin  (X'  +  a,)  will  be  denoted  by  qn\ 

§  20.  The  second  order  terms  arising  from  the  semi-diurnal  atmospheric  oscillation 
are  similarly  written  down  as  follows  :  — 

(«)       P.M[{(W-4Q/)  cos2  <H¥Q52  +  4Q32)  sin2  S}  sin  (2X'-a3) 

+  {(-  W-Q/)  sin  (3X/-a2)  +  (Y-Q51-6Q31)  sin  (x'-aa)}  sin  S  cos  S 
-  iW  cos3  S  sin  (4X'-ai!)  +  (l2Q30-ArQQ50-^Q1u)  cos2  S  sin  (-0,)], 

(l>)        pa'di[{-W  sin  (2X'-a8)  +  (VQ3u-SQiu)  sin  (-as)}  cos  S 

-(-15<iQ31  +  IQi1)  sin  S  sin  (X'-a,)], 
in  (2X'-«2)  +  (-mu-¥Q3°)  sin  (-a,)}  cos  3 

-(¥QB1  +  ¥Q81)  sin  S  sin  (x'-aa)], 
sin  (3X'-oa)  +  (gQ31-  VQ,1)  sin  (x'-a,)}  cos  S 


i[{(-5Qo3+tQ33)  sin  (3X'-a2)  +  (lGQ51-25Q31)  sin  (X'-a,)}  cos  S 

-(8QB3+  10Q3a)  sin  S  sin  (2X'-a3)], 

+P<*di  [{~^Q84  sin  (4X'-a2)  +  (8Q52-35Q33)  sin  (2X'-aa)}  cos  S 

-(¥Q53+-m3)sm«r]. 

The  values  of  p.*  calculated  from  the  above  expressions  are  given  in  Table  II. 


EARTH'S    MAONKTFSM    I'lJOMCKI)   BY   THK    MOON   AND  SUN.  299 


T\I:I.I:  I.     Velocity  Potential  Qt1  on 


,  _       _J_        5    d*  cos3  S  _   13     cos'i!  /  ,  _  d,j 
P-  ''        Gdt>     432       d*          252 '    da*    l '  ;      '/., 


3  dl  cos 


20 


»'-       15 


cos 


ft1- 


3  ntt  sin 


20      rC 


ftl- 


d}  sin 


^ 
45 


ft'- 


1  c?i  cos  S 
90     d0a     ' 


ft'  = 


1   ti,"  sin  S  cos  $       1  sin  8  cos 
72"    "^7"        "42"    dua 


2  BJU  J  cos  S  /  ,  _  <V  \ 
35<C    "T"     ci,/' 


3  _       sin  S  cos  S  d£  _  sin  S  cos  ^  / 


v>?  = ' — TT-  [d*  — j- ) , 

•^4  o  m  w  ^    \   •*     /7  .' ' 


COS' 


«  7  _ 

V  '      do/' 


7a    -  - 


cos"  S    d*     coe"  S  ij      d*\ 
144   '  d*     84d^\  *      0 


OOtfS 
ZSOdJ  V1** 


2  Q  2 


300  DR.  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 

TABLE  II.—  Velocity  Potential  Q2»sin  (2\  +  t-a2). 


, 


-1  __  i!_         2        . 

' 


i  _        H>  r/,  cos  i$ 
PJ  G3~d7~' 

i  _        3  dt  cos  (? 
p4  '        70~d^T' 

J=       _8_  dl  sin  (? 
63     d,,2     ' 

3  _       J_  f?i  sin  (? 
35     rf 

„  . 


.t  _          1     r/i  cos 
" 


140      df 

d2 


o=.._CC08  __ 

^ 


36 


o=  _   __,         , 

105  ^  r-^j' 

„,  i  _      _§_  sin  J  cos  S  I,      d^\ 
35"    df  -TJ> 


i  _ 


sin  ,?  cos  J     sin  <$  cos  c5  /  ,      d  2 

"          -      - 


-o  .  _        16  sin  3  cos  S     , 

525  2"' 


2  =  _ 

525 


sin  a  cosj  _  sin  ^  cos  S  I,      d 
~-- 


«  a  = sn 


'  ll 


,=  _ 


EARTH'S   MACNF.TISM   PRODUCED  BY  THE  MOON  AND  SUN.  301 

As  this  paper  is  primarily  concerned  with  the  lunar  diurnal  variation  of  the  earth's 
magnetism,  the  numerical  values  of  the  coefficients  pn*  arising  from  expression  (2) 
owing  to  the  inclination  of  the  magnetic  to  the  geographical  axis  will  not  be  written 
down  here.  This  can  at  once  be  done,  when  necessary,  from  the  equations  (5),  as 
also  the  terms  in  the  current  potential  arising  from  diurnal  and  semi-diurnal 
atmospheric  oscillations  of  degree  higher  than  the  type. 

§  21.  The  main  general  result  of  our  investigation  is  the  same  in  form  as  that  of 
SCHUSTER'S  more  special  calculations,  viz.,  that  the  current  function  R  of  electric  flow 
induced  under  the  action  of  the  vertical  force  C  cos  6  in  a  shell  of  air  oscillating  with 
a  velocity  potential  AmTQmT  sin  (r.  \  +  t—  a),  under  the  influence  of  a  variable  resistivity 
depending  on  the  zenith  distance  («)  of  the  sun,  is 


(6)  AMT[  2  p/Q/sin  {<r(X  +  t)-a}+  2  g.'Q.'  sin  {<r(\  +  *) 

9=0  V=  1 

In  order  to  obtain  the  magnetic  potential  of  the  variation  caused  by  the  flow  of  air, 
a  factor  —  4ir(/t+l)/(2n+l)  must  be  inserted  before  each  term  Q,'. 

We  have  considered  only  those  terms  in  the  resistivity  which  depend  on  cos  u>  and 
cos*  u>,  though  the  general  theory  has  been  given  for  any  numl)er  of  terms.  If  then 


cos  w+dj  cos*  u>), 
we  have  for  the  conductivity  p,  to  the  same  degree  of  approximation, 


If  we  put 

Caed0      *""  d0      p0'  c 

this  becomes 

p  =  p0  +  pl  COS  o>  +  pa  COS2  w. 


In  SCHUSTER'S  calculation,  the  last  term  was  omitted,  so  that  p,  was  taken  equal  to 
zero,  while  p,  cos  $  and  p,  sin  S  were  written  p9v  and  p0v  respectively.  If  we  make 
these  substitutions  in  Tables  I.  and  II.,  it  is  readily  verified  that  the  present  results, 
as  far  as  they  go,  reduce  to  those  obtained  by  SCHUSTER.  The  extra  terms  depending 

on  d3—  -j-  give  the  effect  of  the  term  cosa  <a  in  p. 
dQ 

§  22.  Finally,  a  word  must  be  said  with  regard  to  the  legitimacy  of  our  analysis, 
considering  the  fact  that  if  p  falls  to  zero,  K',  the  resistivity,  must  become  infinite. 
Regarding  the  matter  physically,  it  is  evident  that  an  infinite  resistivity  is  not  likely 
to  introduce  spurious  terms  into  the  current  potential,  and  an  examination  of  the 
equation  (l)  for  R  will  show  that  an  actual  infinity  in  K  would  only  lead  to  a 
/.fro  term  in  R.  But  such  an  infinite  term  should  not  occur  in  the  analysis,  and  it 


302  I>R.  R-  CHAPMAN   ON   THE  DIURNAL   VARIATIONS   OF  THE 

is  clear  that  by  altering  the  constant  term  in  p,  so  that  p  never  falls  to  zero,  the 
;I|K>V<-  calculations  become  formally  and  really  legitimate  ;  when  we  wish  to  return  to 
the  actual  case  we  must  appeal  to  the  "  law  of  continuity,"  and  the  fact  that  our 
mathematics  is  applied  to  an  ordinary  physical  problem,  to  allow  us  to  pass  to  the 
limiting  value  of  da  in  the  final  result.  The  latter  is  expressed  as  a  power  series 
in  \jd0,  and  if  d0  is  sufficiently  diminished,  this  series  might  become  non-convergent. 
But  the  actual  results  do  not  indicate  any  such  behaviour,  and  are,  as  we  have  seen, 
identical  with  those  obtained  by  SCHUSTER'S  method  (in  which  the  conductivity  only 
was  considered),  so  far  as  the  scope  of  the  two  calculations  is  the  same. 

§23.  So  far  the  calculations  have  been  kept  quite  general,  in  that  no  relation 
between  the  causes  of  the  variable  conductivity  and  of  the  atmospheric  oscillation 
has  been  assumed.  Thus  they  may  both  be  caused  by  the  sun,  in  which  case  the 
mathematics  is  that  applicable  to  the  theory  of  the  solar  diurnal  variations  of  the 
earth's  magnetism.  Without  much  modification,  however,  they  may  equally  well  be 
adapted  to  the  case  of  the  lunar  diurnal  variations.  We  shall  consider  it  sufficient, 
for  our  purpose,  to  regard  the  solar  and  lunar  periods  as  equal  at  any  one  time, 
allowing  for  the  slow  cumulative  effect  of  their  inequality  by  introducing  a  variable 
phase  angle  v  into  the  expression  for  cos  w,  the  quantity  on  which  p  and  K  depend. 
Thus 

cos  to  =  sin  <5  cos  0  +  cos<?sin0  cos  (\  +  t'  +  v), 

where  tf  is  now  the  local  lunar  time  of  the  standard  meridian  (measured  from  upper 
culmination),  and  v  measures  the  lunar  phase,  increasing  from  0  to  2-rr  from  one  new 
moon  to  the  next.  The  velocity  potential  will  be  Q22  sin  (2\  +  t'—a).  The  calculations 
will  be  formally  the  same  if  we  now  change  the  meaning  of  X'  to  X  +  t'+v,  so  that  the 
velocity  potential  becomes 

Q/sin(2X'-a-2i>). 

Thus  by  equation  (6)  the  current  function  obtained  is 

2  J>/Q/sin{«rA'-a-2,-}  +   2  qn'QS  tun(a\'+a  +  2v) 

»  =  0  <r=l 

2  g/Q/sin  {<r(\ +  «')  +  «  + (<r+ 2)*}. 


<r=l 


The  terms  on  the  left  of  the  last  line  change  in  phase  through  an  angle  2(o—  2)v 
each  month,  viz.,  -2*  for  the  diurnal  term,  zero  for  the  semi-diurnal  term, 
+  2ir  for  the  third  component,  and  +4ir  for  the  fourth  component,  as  the  observa- 
tions indicated.  The  terms  on  the  left  change  phase  by  2(^+2)^  each  month, 
a  change  so  rapid  that  it  would  be  difficult  to  detect  in  the  observations, 
affected  as  these  are  by  accidental  error.  The  coefficients  qn',  moreover,  are  very 
small,  so  that  altogether  these  terms  are  negligible. 

One  interesting  result  of  the  analysis  may  be  noticed  here,  viz.,  that  the  main 


EARTH'S   MAGNETISM    PRODUCED  BY  THE   MOON   AND  SUN. 


303 


lunar  term  in  the  magnetic  variation,  Qa*,  has  a  coefficient  p'  which  does  not  (to  the 
order  of  accuracy  of  our  calculations)  show  any  dependence  on  solar  declination.  Thus 
any  seasonal  change  in  this  term  of  the  magnetic  potential  cannot  be  referred  to  the 
effect  of  the  varying  declination  of  the  sun.  This  is  not  quite  the  case  with  regard 
to  the  main  diurnal  term  in  the  solar  diurnal  magnetic  variation. 

§  24.  We  will  now  consider  what  are  likely  values  of  p,/p0  and  p.Jpa  to  substitute  in 
our  formuLe,  in  order  to  get  a  comparison  with  the  observed  data.  The  conductivity 
should  rise  to  a  maximum  during  the  daytime  and  fall  to  a  minimum  about  midnight. 
It  cannot  actually  be  less  than  zero,  though  it  is  not  so  clear  that  it  is  better  to  have 
the  least  value  of  p  zero  than  to  have  it  slightly  less,  in  order  to  make  the  mean 
nightly  conductivity  small  in  amount.  However,  we  will  keep  to  this  condition,  and 
make  pmln.  =  0  ;  it  is  found  that  the  following  is  a  very  satisfactory  expression  for  the 

representation  of  a  function  of  6  which  is  large  for  values  of  6  up  to  -,  and  much 

2i 

smaller,  while  never  negative,  from  6  =  £  to  -IT  :  — 


The  following  table  and  figure  gives  the  value  of  4p/p0  for  every  10°.  It  is  seen 
that  the  mean  of  the  nine  day  values  is  '24'  1  times  that  of  the  nine  night  values. 
The  function  has  a  physically  false  maximum  at  midnight,  but  this  is  of  very  small 
amount,  and  some  such  feature  cannot  be  avoided  with  so  simple  an  expression 
for  p  :  — 


(D. 

0°. 

10°. 

20°. 

30°. 

40°. 

50°. 

60°. 

70°. 

80°. 

90°. 

4p/*> 

25-0 

24-5 

22-2 

21-1 

18-5 

15-4 

12-2 

9-2 

6-4 

4-0 

ID. 

100°. 

110°. 

120". 

130°. 

140°. 

150°. 

160°. 

170°. 

180°. 

4p/Po 

2-2 

0-9 

0-2 

o-o 

0-1 

0-4 

0-6 

ro 

1-0 

*  I  might  remark  here  that  in  working  out  Part  II.  of  this  paper  I  had  not  contemplated  the  possibility 
of  the  coefficients  of  p/p0  being  greater  than  unity,  as  seems  to  be  necessary  if  the  atmospheric  conductivity 
is  small  and  nearly  constant  at  night.  The  size  of  these  coefficients  makes  it  necessary  to  carry  the 
calculations  some  steps  further  than  I  have  already  done,  before  a  sufficient  degree  of  approximation  is 
arrived  at.  The  present  work  suffices,  however,  to  establish  the  point  with  which  I  am  most  immediately 
concerned,  viz.,  that  the  size  of  the  fourth  harmonic  in  the  lunar  variation  is  inexplicable  with  the  form 
a  +  fccosw  for  p,  while  the  addition  of  a  term  ccos3ui  introduces  a  fourth  harmonic  in  the  theoretical 
result,  which  agrees,  as  to  order  of  magnitude,  with  the  observed  quantity.  Better  olwerved  data  are  now 
lifing  obtained,  and  concurrently  I  shall  proceed  to  carry  the  theoretical  calculations  further,  in  order  to 
test  the  exact  numerical  agreement  between  theory  and  observation. — June  11,  1913. 


|.K.  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS   OF  THE 


Diagram  illustrating  the  assumed  form  for  the  atmospheric  conductivity 
P  =  po  (1  +  3  cos  <o  +  j  cos2  <o). 


§  25.  Substituting  the  values 


in  the  expressions  for  pf  in  Table  II.  (the  table  which  relates  to  the  lunar  variation), 
we  get  the  following  values  for  p0Caepn°.  The  terms  for  which  o-  =  0  are  omitted,  as 
they  merely  produce  a  monthly  change  in  the  mean  magnetic  elements. 


V. 

n. 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

1 

ij  sin  8  cos  8 

J|cos8 

}£  sin  8  cos  8 

-VffCOsS 

-  j1,^  sin  8  cos  8 

2 

5",  sin  8 

5 

A  s>»  5 

-Tr!ff(3co828-l) 

3 

jYo  sin  8  cos  8 

TTT  cos  S 

T  1  f  sin  8  cos  8 

4 

TAuCOS^S 

EARTH'S   MACM  1IS.M    l'l:oi>(JCEP  BY  THE   MOON   AND  SUN.  ::<'.. 

The  following  are  the  values  of  the  corresponding  tesseral  harmonics:— 

Qi'ssind,  Q,1  =  3  sin  6  cos  0,  Q,1  =  i  sin  0(5  cos'  6-1), 

Q,1  =  i  sin  0(70  cos3  6-  15  cos  0),  Q*1  =  g  sin  0(63  cos4  0-84  cos*  0+3), 

Qa3  =  3  sina0,  Q,s  =  15  sin*0  cos  0,  Q4S  =  \*  sin'0(l4  cos8  0-1), 

Qs»  =  J-lp  sin*  0  (3  cos3  0-2  cos  0), 

Q3S  =  15  sin"  0,          Q<»  =  105  sin8  0  cos  0,  06'  =  H'A  «n*  0  (9  cos*  0-2), 

Q/  =  105  sin4  0,         Q6«  =  945  sin4  0  cos  0. 

Since  all  the  stations  for  which  we  have  observational  data,  in  Part  III.,  are 
tropical,  we  shall  consider  the  values  of  X,  Y,  and  Z  for  such  stations  only.  Hence, 
in  our  expression  for  V,  the  magnetic  potential  (which  we  must  now  use  instead  of 
the  current  function),  all  terms  containing  coss0  may  be  neglected,  and  will  be 
omitted.  Thus  we  get 

•CT       /.  -  ,,         «   sin  0  cos  0         ,,      .     .        »sin0\        /.,  ,          \ 

V  =  [£H  COBS.  -  •   +  TgJ08>"<*C08  S—  —  )c08(\'  +  »<-a), 

\  r  r  I 

,//,.,     .,  -         —j-i  —  Txsina0cos0  l7]     •     .    sin*  01         /„  ,       ^ 
+  {(¥  +  i  I  •  3  cos"  S-  1)  -  -  -  +  -fts  sm  S  .  -pp-j  cos  (2X'-a), 

•    .        ,sin30\       /„./  \ 

sindcosd  —  —  )cos(3\  —  v—  a), 


2  .    sin40  CO80        /  ..  ,    0        \ 
cos  o  •  -     ~j  --  OP6  (4X  —  2c—  a). 


In  the  above  expression,  the  terms  depending  on  sin  S  represent  the  main  seasonal 
effect.     Since 


Y  v 

aX  =  -r—  ,         aY  =    . 

' 


-r—  ,  .    n  .  ,  --  =-, 

df)  '  BmOdX  dr 

it  is  evident  that  when  cos0  is  put  equal  to  zero  after  the  differentiation,  only  the 
terms  in  V  which  do  not  contain  cos  0  will  contribute  any  result  to  Y  and  Z.  But 
the  above  equation  shows  also  that  these  terms  always  contain  sin  S,  so  that  at 
equatorial  stations  Y  and  Z  change  sign  in  passing  from  summer  to  winter. 
Tables  XL  and  XIII.  corroborate  this  sufficiently  well,  especially  when  it  is 
remembered  that  the  stations  are  not  quite  equatorial,  and  that  the  obliquity  of  the 
magnetic  axis  also  produces  a  disturbing  effect.  A  further  interesting  consequence 
of  the  above  equations  is  to  indicate  that  at  the  equator  the  terms  in  X  which 
depend  on  sin  <?,  i.e.,  the  seasonal  terms  in  the  horizontal  force  variation,  vanish. 
This  agrees  with  the  known  fact  that  at  tropical  stations  the  X  variation  hardly 
'•lianas  throughout  the  year.  Table  XII.  illustrates  this,  especially  for  the  most 
nearly  equatorial  observatory,  Batavia  (6°  S.). 

Km  comparison  with  observation  we  shall  write  down  the  values  of  the  ratios 
of  the  amplitudes  of  the  first,  third,  ami  fourth  harmonic  components  to  that  of  the 

vol..  i  .  AMI.  —  A.  2  R 


SOfi 


1,1;.  s.  CHAI'MAX  ON  THE  DIURNAL   VARIATIONS  OF  THE 


second;  for  X  we  take  the  mean  value  of  cos  S  in  our  equations,  and  neglect  the 
seasonal  changes ;  for  Y  and  Z  the  terms  in  cos  6  and  sin  S  are  taken  separately. 
The  values  of  the  amplitudes  of  the  second  component  in  the  several  cases  are 
also  given.  It  should  be  remarked  that  our  calculations  have  not  been  carried 
sufficiently  far  to  give  the  seasonal  variation  of  the  fourth  component,  but  it  is  less 
important  than  the  term  in  cos  6,  for  such  stations  as  Bombay.  We  thus  obtain  the 
following  table : — 


die, 

(VC* 

C4/C2. 

C2. 

x 

0-61 

0-47 

0-13 

2-61 

Y(cos0) 
(sin  S) 
Z  (cos  0) 
(sin  8) 

0-31 
0-04 
0-41 
0-05 

0-70 
0-55 
0-62 
0-49 

0-27 
0-22 

5-22  cos  6 
1-OlsinS 
7  -83  cos  6 
1  •  52  sin  8 

From  SCHUSTER'S  calculations,  taking  pjpo  =  1+cos  w,  the  following  table  of  values 
of  C/C,,  in  which  the  seasonal  changes  are  disregarded,  is  obtained : — 


eye* 

Ca/Cj. 

C4/C2. 

X 

0-G7 

0-38 

0-002 

Y  (cos  6>) 
Z  (cos  ff) 

0-33 
0-62 

0-58 
0-46 

0-003 
0-0025 

Our  observational  data  only  allow  us  to  make  the  roughest  possible  comparison 
with  these  calculations,  and  the  following  table  is  enough  to  give  an  idea  of  what 
agreement  is  present.  It  is  got  by  taking  the  mean  amplitudes  at  Bombay,  Batavia, 
and  Trevandrum  (as  many  as  afford  data  in  each  case)  for  the  whole  year,  combining 
the  columns  April  to  September  and  October  to  March  together  by  simply  averaging 
the  amplitudes  regardless  of  phase. 


C,/C2. 

Ca/Cj. 

C4/C2. 

X 

0-94 

0-42 

0-28 

Y 

0-50 

0-64 

0-23 

Z 

0-85 

1-06 

0-47 

The  size  of  the  fourth  harmonic  shows  that  the  term  cos3  a>  in  p/p^  has  distinct 
importance,  for  without  the  presence  of  such  a  term,  as  the  second  of  the  above 
tables  show,  there  should  be  no  appreciable  fourth  harmonic  at  all.  As  regards  the 
other  harmonics,  there  is  little  to  chose  between  the  two  expressions  for  p/p0,  though 


KAIMirs    MACNKTISM    1'KOIHVKH    i:Y   TIIK   MOON   AND  SUN. 


807 


the  more  complex  one  might  bo  made  to  fit  better  than  the  above  figures  indicate,  if 
the  constants  of  the  formula  were  altered  a  little.  This,  however,  is  not  worth  while 
doing  till  better  observational  material  is  to  hand. 


PART  III. — Tlw  Ol>*<  r  fit  tonal  Material. 

§  2G.  The  following  are  the  data  which  were  available  for  examining  the  dependence 
of  tin1  lunar  magnetic  variation  upon  lunar  phase : — 


Station  and  period. 


Sub-division  of  month. 


Seasonal  ( li vision. 


Trovandrtim  (1854-64) .... 
Bombay  (CHAMBERS)  (1846-71) . 

(Moos)  (1872-89)     .    . 
Batavia  (1883-99) 


Bombay  (CHAMBERS)  (1846-73) .    . 

(Moos)  (1872-89)     .     .    . 

„      (1873-79,        1881, 

1883-85)  .     .     . 

Batavia  (1883-99) 


DECLINATION. 

Four  quarters  of  month 
Eight  phases 


HORIZONTAL  FORCE. 
Eight  phases 


Bombay  (Moos)    . 
Batavia  (1883-99) 


VERTICAL  FORCE. 
Eight  phases 


Separate  months  of  year. 
Nov.-Jan.,     Feb.-April,      May-July, 
Aug.-Oct.,  April-Sept.,  Oct.-March. 
Nov.-Jan. 
April-Sept.,  Oct.-March. 


As  for  declination. 
Nov.-Jan. 

May-July. 

April-Sept.,  Oct.-March. 


As  for  declination, 
it  >>  • 


For  purposes  of  comparison,  the  Trevandrum  results  for  the  separate  months  of  the 
year  have  been  combined  into  the  four  quarters  and  the  two  half  years  (as  for 
Bombay)  ;  also  the  25  hourly  values  have  been  reduced  to  24. 

The  separate  tables  of  the  24  hourly  values  will  not  be  repeated  here,  nor  the  a 
and  b,  and  C  and  0  coefficients  of  the  first  four  harmonic  components  which  have 
been  calculated  from  those  tables.  The  harmonic  formula  used  has  l>een 

a,  cos  t  +  &,  sin  t  +  Oy  cos  2t  +  62  sin  2t  +  a3  cos  3t  +  b3  cos  3<  +  «4  cos  U  +  64  sin  U, 


In  the  case  of  all  the  coefficients  a,  b,  0,  the  adopted  unit  is  10~7  G.G.S.  units  of  force 
(the  declination  results  were  also  reduced  in  terms  of  force),  and  this  was  reckoned 
positive  towards  the  North,  West,  and  upwards  (II,  D,  V). 

$-7.  The  tables  of  harmonic  coefficients  showed  that  they  were  subject  to  an 
accidental  error  of  amount  small  in  itself,  but  quite  a  considerable  fraction  of  the 

2  R  2 


308  DR.  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 

whole  effect.  This  is  not  surprising  when  the  minuteness  of  the  lunar  variation  is 
considered.  The  tables  showed  some  outstanding  features,  however,  in  particular 
the  constancy  (within  reasonable  limits)  of  C2  and  0a  ;  CIt  Cs,  C4  are  generally  smaller 
and  rather  more  irregular  in  amount  for  the  eight  phases.  The  phase  angles  0, 
showed  a  fairly  regular  increase  through  2-*  with  the  moon's  age,  while  0,  showed  a 
less  regular  decrease  of  the  same  amount.  No  regular  change  in  04  was  noticed, 
partly  because  C4  is  small  and  04  therefore  not  well  determined,  till  the  Batavian 
summer  declination  results  were  considered  ;  in  this  case  the  fourth  harmonic 
happened  to  be  exceptionally  large,  and  the  phase  therefore  better  determined. 
This  clue  having  once  been  obtained,  the  same  feature,  viz.,  a  monthly  increase  of 
4ir  in  the  phase  angle  94,  was  verified  to  be  present  in  most  other  cases,  where  C4 
was  not  too  small.  The  examination  of  the  phase  laws  followed  by  the  harmonic 
components  was  first  undertaken  by  means  of  vector  diagrams,  and  independently  of 
the  theoretical  considerations  which  suggested  themselves  later,  and  which  are 
embodied  in  §§  12,  23. 

The  real  test  of  the  phase  laws  suggested  by  the  vector  diagrams  was  made,  of 
course,  by  correcting  the  phases  by  the  amount  through  which  the  law  indicated  they 
had  changed  from  the  period  of  new  moon.  The  corrected  values,  tf  (where 


V2    =    &i> 


v  being  the  moon's  age,  in  angular  measure,  at  the  particular  lunar  phase  considered) 
should  then  all  be  the  same  (for  the  same  value  of  the  suffix  and  different 
values  of  v),  apart  from  accidental  error.  The  Tables  III.  to  X.  show  that  this 
is  the  case,  generally,  as  far  as  we  have  any  right  to  expect,  though,  in  some 
instances,  the  agreement  is  not  very  apparent.  Even  in  these  cases,  however, 
the  mean  value  of  &  frequently  agrees  so  closely  with  the  mean  value  of  tfa  as  to 
show  that  the  phase  law  is  acting,  though  its  manifestation  is  obscured  by  large 
accidental  error.  This  agreement  between  tflt  tf2,  &3,  and  0'4  is  a  noticeable  feature, 
of  which,  as  well  as  of  the  monthly  changes  of  phase,  the  theory  of  the  lunar  variation 
gives  a  satisfactory  account  (§  23).  On  general  grounds,  too,  it  is  to  be  expected 
that  if  any  simple  relation  exists  at  all  between  the  phase  angles  of  the  four  harmonic 
components,  this  relation  should  assume  the  simplest  form  (which  proves  to  be 
equality)  at  new  moon,  when  the  sun  and  moon  are  on  the  same  meridian.  The 
equality  of  the  phase  angles  at  new  moon  points  to  a  single  exciting  cause  (the  lunar 
atmospheric  tide  being  suggested)  of  the  four  components. 

The    regular    monthly   change   in   the   values   of  0,,    03,    and    04   results   in    the 


i:\HTIIS    MAUNETISM   PRODrci-.l»    UY  THE  MOON   AND  SUN.  309 

disappearance  of  th(>  corn-sponding  harmonic  components  from  the  lunar  variation, 
as  (I'-ti-i -inined  from  the  mean  of  a  whole  number  of  months.  It  is  found,  indeed, 
that  any  such  component  still  remaining  is  of  purely  accidental  character. 

As  to  the  amplitude  of  the  various  components,  this  appears  to  be  independent  of 
the  lunar  phase,  the  irregularities  l>eing  accidental.  The  mean  of  the  amplitudes  at 
the  separate  phases  has  therefore  been  taken  as  the  best  value  of  the  true  amplitude, 
except  that  a  correction  has  l>een  applied  to  allow  for  the  fact  that  the  instantaneous 
amplitude  is  greater  than  that  deduced  from  the  mean  of  a  few  days,  during  which 
the  phase  is  varying.  Thus,  if  we  tabulate  a  function  c  cos(n6  +  kv),  where  Q  is  the 
lunar  hour  angle  (one  hour  =  15°)  and  v  the  age  of  the  moon  in  angular  measure,  in 
lunar  hours  for  successive  days  over  an  interval  of  the  month  t>l  to  i/2,  the  mean  result 
may  be  taktm  as 

c  (cos  nd  cos  kv— sin  nd  sin  kv) 


where  cos  kv,  sin  kv  are  the  mean  values  of  these  functions  over  the  range  vl  to  v.2. 
This  equals 


showing  that  the  phase  of  the  mean  wave  is  equal  to  the  true  phase  at  the  mean 
time,  but  that  the  amplitude  is  reduced  in  the  ratio 


sin 


2  ("•-"*) 

The  corresponding  factors  to  counterbalance  this  are  for  Trevaudrum,  where  va—  vt 
is  one-quarter  of  a  month,  or  ^, 


and         l'57(C4), 


and  at  other  stations,  where  va—  vt  =  -", 

4 


1'02(C,,  C,)         and         l'll(C4). 

The  values  of  the  mean  amplitudes,  thus  corrected,  and  of  the  phases  of  the 
four  components,  reduced  to  new  moon,  for  all  the  stations,  are  summarized  in 
Tables  XI.-XIII. 

Tin*  resolved  parts  of  the  amplitudes  in  the  direction  of  the  mean  phase  (where 
the  separate  values  of  tf  depart  much  from  the  mean)  might  have  been  taken,  but 
this  would  not  have  altered  the  mean  amplitude  greatly,  and  seemed  hardly  worth 


810 


DR.  S.  rilU'MAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 


while  in  view  of  the  large  accidental  variations  of  the  determined  amplitudes.  In 
Tables  XI.-XIII.  the  values  of  the  mean  phases  tf  have  been  characterized  by 
affixes  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  representing  (in  descending  order  of  merit)  the  reliability  of  the 
mean  as  judged  from  the  accordance  of  the  separate  values  of  tf.  Only  the  numbers 
marked  1  to  3  can  be  considered  at  all  satisfactory. 

As  regards  the  accordance  of  the  results  from  the  same  or  different  stations,  the 
best  feature  is  the  extremely  good  agreement  between  CHAMBERS'  and  Moos's  values 
for  Bombay,  for  different  periods  of  time  and  for  different  instruments.* 


*  VAN  BEMMEI.EN,  in  his  paper  in  the  'Met.  Zeitschr.,'  May,  1912,  already  referred  to,  remarks  that 
the  two  computations  do  not  agree  at  all,  but  this  must  evidently  be  due  to  a  mistaken  reduction  of 
CM  AM  units'  results,  which  he  quotes  at  three  times  their  proper  value. 


TABLE  III. — Trevandrum.     Declination  West. 


Lunar  phase. 

c,. 

ffi. 

oy, 

0-2- 

C3. 

0'3. 

C4. 

<?i. 

New  moon 
First  quarter 
Full  moon 
Last  quarter 

96 
36 
75 
45 

0 

294 
270 
220 
261 

Noveml 

204 
162 
162 
162 

0 

>er-Janu{ 

285 
266 
263 

277 

iry. 

96 
90 
66 
75 

0 

306 

252 
296 
300 

15 
15 
12 

9 

0 

259 
313 
254 
246 

Mean    .     .     . 

63 

261 

172 

273 

82 

288 

13 

268 

February-April. 

New  moon 
First  quarter 
Full  moon 
Third  quarter 

84 
54 
36 
57 

5 
3 
-114 
-    29 

90 
105 
102 
114 

291 
310 
318 
353 

45 
60 
39 

51 

339 
331 
367 
363 

11 
3 
11 
10 

43 
6 
9 
86 

Mean   .    .    . 

58 

326 

~                             i  — 

103 

~ 

313 

49 

350 

9 

31 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  1Q-*  C.G.S. 


unit. 


KAKTII'S   MAGNETISM   PRODUCED   BY  THE  MOON  AND  SUN. 


311 


TM.I.I:  III.  (continued). 


Lunar  phase. 

c,. 

"> 

(                  Ot. 

C* 

r» 

C4. 

r* 

• 

• 

May-July. 

• 

« 

New  moon 
First  quarter 
Full  moon 

57 
72 
54 

115 
72 
43 

72 
63 
39 

84 
90 
102 

60 
30 
36 

70 
130 
93 

15               62 
12              272 
8               27 

Third  quarter 

13 

98 

42 

71 

45 

96 

21           -   37 

Mean    .     .    . 

49 

82 

54 

87 

43               97 

14               81 

* 

August-  October. 

New  moon 

39 

39 

36 

134 

18 

149               4 

141 

First  quarter 
Full  moon 

36 
81 

92 
43 

42 
63 

174 
139 

16 
39 

214              16 
160              15 

167 
324 

Third  quarter 

33 

140 

39 

184 

15 

187 

17 

203 

Mean    .     .     . 

47 

78 

45 

158 

22 

177              13 

209 

April-September. 

New  moon 

51 

73 

69               88              48 

82              13                59 

First  quarter 
Full  moon 

45 
66 

50 
37 

45               95              24               116                5            -    56 
30             106              36               100                6            -    23 

Third  quarter 

12 

6 

24 

67              21                 96              10           -   66 

I                                       1                                       ' 

Mean    .     .     . 

43 

42 

42 

89 

32 

98 

8 

341 

October-March. 

New  moon             60 

32 

162 

282 

75 

306 

6 

253 

First  quarter            12 

-      3 

135 

276 

78              296 

14 

330 

Full  moon             51 

-141 

135 

273 

48 

301 

10 

294 

Third  quarter 

54 

-    57 

120 

289 

51 

316 

5 

228 

Mean    .     .     .  1        44 

318 

138 

280 

63 

305 

9 

276 

i                    i 

[ 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tablet  of  amplitude  is  10~7  C.G.S.  unit. 


;:  l  •_' 


DR.  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 


TABLE  IV. — Bombay  (CHAMBERS).     Declination  West. 


Lunar  phase. 

CL 

*i. 

ft. 

ft. 

cs. 

ff* 

C4. 

** 

0                                  •                                  • 

Augusts-October. 

0 

1 

73 

125 

Ill 

112 

63 

108 

18 

108 

2 

19 

160 

68 

150 

32 

110 

19 

31 

3 

68 

93 

92 

150 

39 

152 

23 

211 

4 

41 

104 

62 

131 

38 

116 

12 

241 

& 

33 

96 

89 

124 

78 

99 

20 

49 

6 

53 

126 

68 

127 

22 

128 

6 

(82) 

7 

44 

48 

83 

104 

68 

89 

30 

45 

8 

23 

71 

93 

138 

65 

117 

19" 

135 

Mean  .  .  . 

44 

103 

83 

129 

51 

115 

18 

117 

April-September. 

1 

71 

97 

106 

100 

55 

107 

13  - 

-  30 

2 

45 

105 

96 

117 

58 

109 

18 

29 

3 

55 

90 

76 

119 

33 

108 

14 

277 

4 

52 

120 

64 

91 

57 

86 

11 

9 

5 

33 

75 

71 

108 

75 

114 

17 

95 

6 

60 

135 

63 

124 

38 

108 

20 

197 

7 

17 

64 

68 

90 

58 

107 

8 

20 

8 

31 

82 

70 

120 

45 

111 

14 

248 

Mean  .  .  . 

45 

96 

66 

109 

52 

106 

14 

106 

October-March. 

1 

15 

374 

83 

240 

15      257 

3 

2 

22 

207 

62 

239 

13      433 

15 

400 

3 

23 

314 

82 

250 

36      239 

26 

151 

4 

45 

169 

62 

229 

11      148 

10 

360 

6 

47 

196 

36 

256 

3 

,  

7 

270 

6 

31 

225 

54 

247 

8 

297 

8 

180 

7 

31 

247 

66 

239 

8 

209 

17 

156 

8 

27 

240 

62 

228 

19 

176 

8 

107 

Mean  .  .  . 

30 

246 

63 

241 

14 

251 

12 

232 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  10~7  C.G.S.  unit. 


EARTH'S   MAGNETISM    rkODUCED   ItY   THE  MOON  AND  SUN. 


:U3 


T\I:LE  IV.  (continued). 


Lunar  phase. 

o,. 

r,. 

C2. 

** 

c,. 

" 

C4. 

v  4* 

November-January. 

1 

21 

256 

104 

L't5 

29 

235 

14 

168 

2 

19 

304 

79 

239 

13 

212 

21 

424 

3 

33 

327 

111 

217 

62 

229 

34 

209 

4 

51 

184 

114 

235 

36 

202 

5 

(136) 

5 

79 

192 

93 

•J55 

48 

252 

32 

226 

6 

66 

227 

110 

229 

45 

248 

12 

98 

7 

>;, 

236 

119 

240 

56 

209 

33 

190 

8 

60 

249 

86 

237 

49 

220 

7 

(266) 

Mean  .  .  . 

52 

247 

102 

241 

42 

228 

20 

219 

February-April. 

1 

72 

392 

32 

238 

19 

45 

4 

_ 

2 

32 

283 

13 

222 

42 

76 

11 

32 

3 

29 

265 

54 

263 

18 

-  30 

13 

53 

4 

43 

183 

23 

318 

42 

56 

18 

-  60 

5 

34 

288 

32 

355 

33 

17 

7 

— 

6 

13 

170 

22 

293 

51 

48 

14 

0 

7 

37 

304 

13 

296 

22 

55 

28 

127 

8 

26 

378 

30 

218 

9 

40 

18 

-  26 

Mean  .  .  . 

36 

270 

27 

275 

30 

38 

17 

21 

May-July. 

1 

71 

96 

93 

98 

25 

104 

34 

296 

2 

77 

103 

109 

106 

63 

101 

17 

19 

3 

58 

79 

92 

109 

36 

93 

17      260 

4 

93 

121 

88 

93 

67 

64 

24 

7 

5 

43 

>:> 

78 

102 

72 

64 

28 

102 

6 

57 

149 

79 

113 

46 

100 

29 

-  29 

7 

14 

138 

66 

91 

48 

96 

25 

-  55 

8 

28 

18 

64 

92 

51 

104 

29 

240 

Mean  . 

55 

99 

86 

101 

51 

93 

25 

105 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  10~7  C.O.S.  unit. 
VOL.  CCX1II. — A.  2   8 


314 


DR.  S.  CHAI'M AX  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF    11  IK 
TABLE  V. — Bombay  (Moos).    Decimation  West. 


Lunar  phase. 

C,. 

r,, 

0» 

fc 

C3. 

r» 

C4. 

f* 

0 

Novemb 

0                                                                                     0 

er-January. 

e 

1 

55 

210 

143 

236 

61 

233 

18 

268 

2 

63 

285 

58 

234 

33 

178 

29 

93 

3 

52 

252 

145 

240 

81 

217 

38 

238 

4 

5 

115 

96 

227 

48 

205 

37 

166 

5 

21 

167 

129 

234 

69 

233 

11 

252 

6 

46 

156 

125 

222 

75 

215 

25 

210 

7 

28 

244 

80 

216 

38 

230 

4 

223 

8 

43 

195 

96 

225 

61 

204 

8 

95 

Mean    .    .    . 

39 

203 

109 

229 

58 

214 

21 

193 

TABLE  VI. — Batavia.     Declination  West. 


Lunar  phase. 

0* 

*l. 

C2. 

o* 

C3. 

9* 

C4. 

r* 

g 

0 

April-September. 

o 

o 

1 

38 

38 

40 

104 

14 

173 

12 

263 

2 

59 

147 

49 

167 

35 

312 

20 

240 

3 

20 

99 

41 

115 

17 

251 

10 

239 

4 

43 

295 

36 

13 

13 

321 

14 

232 

5 

1 

— 

12 

6 

30 

269 

28 

264 

6 

16 

251 

33 

119 

17 

206 

20 

235 

7 

18 

203 

29 

255 

34 

257 

21 

256 

8 

11 

189 

10 

270 

14 

225 

28 

227 

Mean  .  .  . 

26 

175 

31 

131 

22 

264 

19 

244 

October-March  . 

1 

85 

280 

238 

278 

153 

291 

16 

299 

2 

44 

177 

172 

266 

126 

290 

61 

300 

3 

34 

346 

175 

268 

131 

283 

62 

237 

4 

83 

171 

130 

257 

104 

289 

51 

395 

5 

84 

276 

237 

288 

148 

296 

68 

320 

6 

68 

178 

154 

264 

144 

283 

68 

301 

12 

347 

181 

264 

131 

282 

32 

304 

8 

53 

173 

148 

260 

97 

284 

23 

323 

Mean  .  .  . 

58 

243 

179 

268 

129 

287 

48 

310 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  10~7  C.G.S.  unit. 


KAl.TM's    MACNKTISM    l'l;i  MUVF.I)    I!Y   TIIK    MOON   AND  SUN. 


315 


TABLE  VII. — Bombay  (On  \MKI:IW).     Horizontal  Force. 


Lunar  phase. 

c,. 

ffi. 

Ca. 

#2-         Cg. 

r» 

C4. 

** 

November-January. 

1 

124     180     178 

188 

50 

183 

28      192 

2 

68 

173     107 

179 

52 

220 

23      125 

3 

103 

123     102 

152 

53 

183 

14      340 

4 

155 

166     133 

178 

14 

168 

3       60 

6 

78 

180      123 

172 

63 

208 

29      178 

6 

161 

196      151 

173 

53 

235 

29 

806 

7 

136 

212      135 

195 

54 

177 

47 

207 

8 

191 

200 

149 

177 

63 

198 

38 

229 

Mean  .  .  . 

127 

179 

136 

177 

50 

198 

26 

204 

February-  April. 

1 

68 

185 

98 

164 

18 

190 

15 

34 

2 

96 

191 

90 

165 

47 

202 

52 

190 

3 

78 

184 

110 

156 

42 

172       8 

(135) 

4 

97 

148      93 

182 

27 

285      64 

222 

5 

77 

145      48 

179 

11 

(397) 

24 

178 

6 

143 

181      45 

155 

21 

199 

12 

124 

7 

24 

(25)      30 

(250) 

30 

344 

29 

136 

8 

189 

181 

70 

176 

54 

225 

52 

95 

Mean  .  .  . 

97 

174      73 

168 

31 

231 

32 

140 

May-July. 

1 

63 

225 

50 

275 

20 

158      18 

46 

2 

71 

157 

88 

163 

9 

103 

9 

60 

3 

62 

214 

83 

174 

47      135 

12 

-12 

4 

33 

151 

50 

101 

20       82 

18 

-  8 

5 

35 

126 

16 

184 

17      164 

16 

82 

6 

50 

283 

60 

243 

9       25 

11 

68 

7 

46 

237 

16 

297 

13 

66 

38 

66 

8 

152 

152 

60 

172 

39 

269 

38 

-24 

Mean  .  .  . 

64 

193 

53 

202 

22 

125 

20 

34 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  10~7  C.G.S.  unit. 

2  8  2 


316 


]>i;   s.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE   DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 


TABLE  VII.  (continued). 


Lunar  phase. 

c,. 

ffi. 

c,. 

fe 

C3. 

*» 

C4. 

0Y 

August-October. 

•                                       0 

1 

67     195      24 

211      12 

309      1 

2 

99 

254 

76 

178      24 

127 

38 

100 

3 

102     250 

41 

198      41 

283 

8 

45 

4 

72      145 

92 

186      38 

207 

26 

184 

5 

43     139      48 

184      10 

246 

23 

206 

6 

93     180 

36 

147      18 

326 

8 

325 

7 

63 

101 

27 

146      35 

33 

8 

35 

8 

93 

178 

72 

148 

32 

2 

13 

127 

Mean  .  .  . 

79 

180 

52 

175. 

26 

192 

16 

146 

April-September. 

1 

82 

211 

43 

239       9 

237 

20 

54 

2 

74 

195 

91 

163       8 

123 

18 

141 

3 

77 

234 

76 

181       8 

162 

20 

-  15 

4 

72 

160 

53 

158      24 

219 

9 

80 

5 

35 

162 

33 

197      15 

151 

17 

110 

6 

33 

212 

35 

197      12 

127 

7 

26 

7         23 

224 

18 

278       3 



22 

68 

136 

118 

61 

171 

16 

264 

11 

-  31 

Mean  ...    66 

190      51 

198 

12 

183 

15 

54 

October-March. 

1 

78 

173 

115 

177 

34 

176 

15 

171 

2 

58 

201 

92 

181 

51 

206      27 

139 

3         74 

140 

93 

149      50 

187      10 

138 

4 

101 

153 

115 

179 

8 

180      29 

208 

5 

71 

147 

93 

171 

37 

231      32 

205 

6 

149 

185 

93 

172 

39 

253      14 

287 

7 

52 

186 

85 

187      30 

201 

30 

183 

8 

170 

193 

113 

169 

52 

201 

13 

166 

Mean  .  ... 

94 

172 

100 

173 

38 

204 

21 

187 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  10""  C.G.S.  unit. 


KAKTHS    \I.\CNKTISM    l'i;<  H '((!.!'    IIV    Till'.    MOON    AM'   SUN. 


317 


TABLE  VIII. — Bombay  (Moos).     Horizontal  Force. 


Lunar  phase. 

c,. 

9+ 

c,. 

A 

C,. 

r» 

c. 

r. 

November-January. 

1 

129      126 

145 

170 

71 

169      43      177 

2 

162 

232 

151 

177      95 

183      11      207 

3 

164 

143 

129 

179      79 

210      36      241 

4 

86      201 

140 

190      85 

183      44      207 

5 

101      171      166 

180      80 

198      14 

212 

6 

161      175      133 

151      66 

192      69' 

241 

7 

112      156      89 

162      59 

167      17 

189 

8 

113 

178 

107 

172 

15 

119 

38 

60 

Mean  .  r—  r1 

128 

173 

132 

171 

69 

178 

34 

192 

t 

May-July. 

1 

85 

185 

48 

185 

58 

306 

53 

301 

2 

122 

229 

22      263      46        6      28 

358 

3 

76 

267 

67      194       8      261      13 

304 

4 

68 

195 

28 

180      22 

51      22 

292 

5 

87 

227 

72 

117      14 

210      15 

291 

6 

75 

112 

40 

228 

40      192      13 

254 

7 

86 

229 

18 

172 

10      186 

4 

234 

8 

139 

216 

88 

179 

20 

165 

24 

409 

Mean  .  ... 

92 

207 

48 

190 

27 

172 

"  22 

305 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  10~T  C.G.S.  unit. 


318 


DR.  S.  CHAPMAN  ON  THE  DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 
TABLE  IX. — Batavia.     Horizontal  Force. 


Lunar  phase. 

Ci. 

ffi. 

C,. 

0+ 

Cs. 

*i. 

C«.      fft. 

• 

1 
April-September. 

1 

118 

215 

99 

250 

18 

251 

23 

-  34 

2 

64 

126 

62 

222 

36 

143 

3 



3 

11 

72 

46      184 

18 

242 

14 

93 

4 

70 

169 

68      200 

24 

155 

9 

22 

5 

122 

221 

70      279 

29 

288      15 

-136 

6 

11 

144      78      197 

50 

128 

1 

^_ 

7 

43 

105      19      173 

22 

408 

14 

30 

8 

55 

107      64 

213 

32 

121 

32 

130 

Mi  -.in  .  .  *  . 

62 

145 

63 

215 

29 

217 

14 

21 

October-March  . 

1 

68 

203 

86 

249 

52 

230 

26 

163 

2 

41 

36 

52 

198 

36 

166 

19 

277 

3 

70 

190 

115 

231 

75 

205 

13 

191 

4 

8 

— 

80 

190 

34 

149 

29 

209 

5 

45 

207 

74 

252 

35 

204 

34 

280 

6 

50 

92 

68 

197 

47 

315 

51 

275 

7 

92 

100 

98 

194 

62 

200 

13 

270 

8 

65 

148 

95 

200 

23 

125 

33 

220 

Mean  .  .  . 

55 

122 

83 

214 

45 

199 

27 

236 

TABLE  X. — Bombay  (Moos).     Vertical  Force  (upwards). 


Lunar  phase. 

c,. 

ffi. 

C2. 

0* 

cs. 

9» 

C4. 

9+ 

0 

Novemb 

• 

«r-JanuE 

try. 

o 

I 

1 

23 

230 

66 

272      56      259 

27 

259 

2 

10 

438 

32 

289      35 

221 

19 

159 

3 

22 

149      33 

246      32 

240 

7 

310 

4 

12 

169 

52 

259 

48 

233 

20 

205 

5 

32 

220 

58 

262 

50 

259 

18 

284 

31 

261 

67 

276 

38 

235 

10 

229 

16 

449 

25 

279 

35 

234 

20 

250 

12 

353 

32 

273 

37 

206 

16 

195 

Mean  .  .  . 

20 

284 

46 

270 

41 

236 

17 

235 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  10~7  C.G.S.  unit. 


EARTH'S   MAGNETISM   PRODUCED  BY  THE  MOON   AND  SUN. 


TAI-.LK  X.  (continued). — Batavia.     Vertical  Force. 


Lunar  phase. 

ft. 

fl. 

c,. 

fc 

c* 

9+ 

C* 

r* 

•                                    •                                    •                                    * 
April-September. 

1 

66 

64 

157 

172 

17 

200 

13 

227 

2 

17 

21 

95 

199 

29 

284 

4 

248 

3 

42 

33 

86 

192 

11 

176 

15 

267 

4 

70 

74 

50 

178 

20 

345 

7 

247 

5 

80 

42 

94 

173 

11 

421 

17 

340 

6 

32 

-20 

62 

193 

54 

311 

22 

293 

7 

28 

7 

82 

194 

21 

286 

8 

264 

8 

59 

-12 

33 

181 

41 

321 

9 

311 

Mean    .    .    . 

49 

26 

82 

185 

26 

293 

12 

275 

October-March. 

1 

47 

349 

36 

385 

113 

12 

38 

15 

2 

43 

293 

44 

335 

101 

0 

26 

17 

3 

29 

367 

17 

351 

99 

6 

34 

3 

4 

27 

304 

26 

393 

74 

-    3 

28 

9 

5 

33 

427 

37 

368 

88 

-    4 

33 

27 

6 

94 

321 

33 

293 

75 

9 

59 

9 

7 

47 

286 

23 

327 

91 

4 

20 

45 

8 

14 

333 

8 

306 

64 

0 

42 

-24 

Mean    .    .    . 

42 

335 

28 

345 

88 

3 

35 

13 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  10  7  C.G.S.  unit. 


820 


Pit.  S.  CFIAI'MAN    OX   THE   DIURNAL  VARIATIONS  OF  THE 


TABLE  XI.— Declination  West. 


Nov.  -Jan. 

Feb.-April. 

May-July. 

Aug.-Oct. 

April-Sept. 

Oct.-March. 

C. 

ff. 

C. 

9. 

C. 

ff. 

C. 

ff. 

C. 

9. 

C. 

ff. 

1 
•J 

3 
4 

70 
172 
91 
20 

2612 
273' 
2888 
869 

64 
103 
54 
14 

3263 
3131 
350' 
312 

Tre 

54 

54 
48 
22 

vandru 

822 
871 
971 
815 

m. 

52 
45 
24 

20 

78a 
1581 
1772 
2098 

48 
42 
36 
13 

422 
891 
98l 
3412 

49 
138 
70 

14 

318s 
2801 
3051 
2762 

Bombay  (CHAMBERS). 

1 

2 
3 
4 

53 
102 
43 
22 

247» 
2411 
2282 
215< 

37 
27 
31 
19 

2704 
275s 
382 
21s 

56 
86 
52 

28 

992 
101' 
931 
1055 

45 
83 
52 

20 

1032 
1291 
1151 
1178 

46 
66 
53 
16 

962 

1091 
1061 
1065 

31 
63 
14 
13 

246s 
2411 
2515 
2325 

Bombay  (Moos). 

1 
2 
3 
4 

40 
109 
59 
23 

203" 
2291 
2141 
193s 

Batavia. 

1 
2 

3 
4 

27 
31 
23 
21 

175* 
131* 
2648 
2441 

59 
179 
132 
53 

2433 
2681 
2871 
3102 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  10~7  C.G.S.  unit. 


K  \l;  HI'S   MACNKTISM    1'ltODUCED  BY  THE  MOON   AND  SUN. 
TABLE  XII. — Horizontal  Force. 


321 


Nov.  -Jan. 

I'Vlt.-April. 

May-July. 

Aug.  -Oct. 

* 

April-Sept 

Oct.  -March. 

C. 

ff. 

C. 

" 

C. 

". 

C. 

ff. 

C. 

ff. 

C. 

ff. 

E 

•ornba^ 

f  (CHA 

MUER8 

)• 

1 

130 

179' 

99 

174* 

66 

193s 

81 

I-" 

68 

190" 

96 

172* 

2 

135 

177' 

73 

168' 

53 

202s 

52 

175* 

51 

198' 

100 

173* 

3 

51 

198" 

32 

231< 

23 

1254 

27 

1924 

12 

1833 

39 

204s 

4 

29 

2044 

36 

140s 

22 

34* 

18 

146< 

17 

54s 

23 

1873 

Bombay  (Moos). 

1 

131 

173s 

94 

207s 

2 

132 

171' 

48 

190s 

3 

71 

178* 

28 

172s 

4 

38 

1923 

24 

305» 

Batavia. 

1 

64 

145« 

56 

122« 

2 

63 

215* 

83 

214s 

3 

30 

217s 

46 

199« 

4 

16 

21* 

SO 

236» 

TABLE  XIII.— Vertical  Force. 


Nov.-Jan. 

Feb.-April. 

May-July. 

Aug.-Oct. 

April-Sept. 

Oct.-March. 

C. 

e. 

C. 

e. 

C. 

e. 

C. 

e. 

C. 

e. 

C. 

e. 

Bom 

bay(M 

oos). 

1 

20 

284s 

2 

46 

2701 

3 

42 

236' 

4 

19 

235» 

Batavia. 

1 

50 

26* 

43 

335* 

•2 

82 

185' 

28 

345* 

3 

27 

293s 

90 

V 

4 

13 

276* 

39 

13s 

The  unit  of  force  in  the  tables  of  amplitude  is  10"7  C.G.S.  unit. 


VOL    ••••Mil. — A. 


2    T 


[     323     J 


VIII.  A  Critical  Study  of  Spectral  Series. — Part  HI.  The  Atomic  Weight  Term 
and  its  Import  in  the  Constitution  of  Spectra. 

By  W.  M.  HICKS,  F.R.S. 

Received  June  7,— Read  June  26,  1913. 

CONTENTS. 

Page 

Abbreviations 323 

The  "  oun  " 324 

Collaterals 336 

The  diffuse  series — 

General 338 

Table  of  denominator  and  satellite  differences 341 

Satellite  separations 352 

Order  differences 353 

The  D  (2)  term 372 

The  S  and  P  series 377 

The  F  series 379 

Closer  approximation  to  the  value  of  the  oun 400 

Ag  and  Au 403 

Summary 407 

Appendix    I.— Sc 408 

„         II. — Wave-lengths  and  notes 411 

ABBREVIATIONS. 

[I.]  and  [II.]  denote  the  two  previous  parts  of  this  discussion  published  respectively  in  the  'Phil. 

Trans.,'  A,  voL  210  (1910),  and  vol.  212  (1912). 
The  formula  for  a  line  is  »  =  N/D^  -  N/Dm*. 
N/Di2  is  the  limit  or  value  when  m  «=  o>. 

£  denotes  the  correction  to  be  added  to  any  limit  adopted  to  give  the  true  value. 
N/D,«Z  is  referred  to  as  the  V  part  (variable). 
Dm  is  referred  to  as  the  denominator  of  the  line. 
"Separation "  of  two  lines  is  the  difference  of  their  wave  numbers. 
"  Difference  "  of  two  lines  is  the  difference  of  their  denominators. 
"Mantissa"  is  the  decimal  part  of  the  denominator. 
v  denotes  the  separation  of  two  lines  of  a  doublet. 

A  is  used  for  the  denominator  difference  of  the  two  lines  which  produces  v. 
v\*  "fc  Aj,  A2  are  similar  quantities  for  triplets. 
VOL.  C'CX I II. A    504.  2    T   2  Publithed  •ep.raUly,  October  22,  1913. 


;<•_•(  DR.   W.   M.  HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY  OF   SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

\V  .lenotes  the  atomic  weight,  w  =  W/100. 
8,  denotes  the  "oun"  =  90-47^. 
S,  »  n&i,  but  S  is  used  for  &4  =  361  •  89w*. 

0  -  C  is  used  for  the  difference  in  wave-length  between  an  observed  line  and  its  calculated  value. 
O  denotes  the  maximum  possible  error  of  observation. 

In  gtnrrnl,  figures  in  brackets  before  lines  denote  intensities,  and  in  brackets  after,  possible  errors  of 
observation. 

THE  doublet  and  triplet  separations  in  the  spectra  of  elements  are,  as  has  long  been 
known,  roughly  proportional  to  the  squares  of  their  atomic  weights,  at  least  when 
elements  of  the  same  group  of  the  periodic  table  are  compared.  In  the  formulae 
which  give  the  series  lines  these  separations  arise  by  certain  terms  being  deducted 
from  the  denominator  of  the  typical  sequences.  For  instance,  in  the  alkalies  if  the 
ja-sequence  be  written  N/Dra2,  where  Dm  =  m  +  n  +  a/m,  the  ^-sequence  for  the  second 
principal  series  has  denominator  D  — A,  and  we  get  converging  doublets;  whereas 
the  constant  separations  for  the  S  and  D  series  are  formed  by  taking 
S,  (  oo )  =  D,  ( oo )  =  N/D,2  and  S2  ( oo )  =  D2  ( oo )  =  N/(D,  -  A)2.  It  is  clear  that  the 
values  of  A  for  the  various  elements  will  also  be  roughly  proportional  to  the  squares 
of  the  atomic  weights.  For  this  reason  it  is  convenient  to  refer  to  them  as  the 
atomic  weight  terms.  We  shall  denote  them  by  A  in  the  case  of  doublets  and  A, 
and  A2  in  the  case  of  triplets,  using  v  as  before  to  denote  the  separations.  Two 
questions  naturally  arise.  On  the  one  hand  what  is  the  real  relation  between  them 
and  the  atomic  weights,  and  on  the  other  what  relation  have  they  to  the  constitution 
of  the  spectra  themselves  ?  The  present  communication  is  an  attempt  to  throw  some 
light  on  both  these  problems. 

The  Dependence  of  the  Atomic  Weight  Term  on  the  Atomic  Weight. 

The  values  of  the  A  can  be  obtained  with  very  considerable  accuracy,  especially  in 
the  case  of  elements  of  large  separations,  i.e.,  of  large  atomic  weight.  If,  therefore, 
the  definite  relation  between  these  quantities  can  be  obtained,  not  only  may  it  be 
expected  to  give  some  insight  into  the  constitution  of  the  vibrating  systems  which 
give  the  lines,  but  it  may  afford  another  avenue  whereby  the  actual  atomic  weights 
of  elements  may  be  obtained,  and  the  solution  of  the  problem  is  therefore  of  importance 
to  the  chemist  as  well  as  to  the  physicist. 

t  may  be  interesting  to  note  the  steps  which  first  led  the  author  to  the  solution 

vhich  follows,  and  incidentally  may  add  some  weight  to  the  formal  evidence  in  its 

has  long  been  known  that  in  the  case  of  triplets  the  ratio  of  A,  :  A2  is 

slightly  larger  than  2.     It  was  natural,  therefore,  in  an  attempt  to  discover 

ion  to  the  atomic  weight  to  consider  the  values  of  A,-2A2.     These  were 

for  several  cases,  A,  and  A3  being  expressed  in  terms  of  the  squares  of  the 

weights.     It  was  at  once  noticed  that  in  several  cases  these  differences  were 

s  of  the  same  number,  in  the  neighbourhood  of  360,  e.g.,  Ca  1,  Sr  3,  Ba  8, 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY"  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  325 

Hg  19,  and,  further,  that  in  many  cases  A,  and  Aa  were  also  themselves  multiples  of 
the  same  number.  As,  however,  Mg  with  a  difference  of  450  and  Zn  of  543  could  not 
possibly  be  brought  into  line  with  the  others,  this  line  of  attack  was  given  up.  But 
later  the  case  of  Zn,  which  at  first  had  seemed  to  stand  in  the  way  of  an  explanation 
on  these  lines,  gave  cause  for  encouragement.  The  series  for  Zn  are  well  defiued,  the 
measures  good,  and  the  formulae  reproduce  the  lines  with  great  accuracy.*  Great 
confidence  can  thus  be  put  in  the  values  for  A,  and  A2,  and  it  was  noticed  that  they 
were  both  extremely  exact  multiples  of  the  difference  Aj  — 2Aa.  In  fact,  the  values 
are  A,  =  31  x  543'446?03  and  A.,  =  15  x  543'476t0*.  This  relation  could  hardly  be  due 
to  mere  chance,  especially  when  it  was  also  noticed  that  543'44  is  very  close  to  3/2  the 
former  360,  and,  further,  the  450  of  Mg  is  about  5/4  tin-  same.  In  other  words,  with 
the  rough  values  used  360  =  4  x  90,  450  =  5  x  90,  and  540  =  6  x  90.  This  looked  so 
promising  that  a  systematic  discussion  of  all  the  data  at  disposal  with  limits  of 
possible  variation  was  undertaken.  The  theory  to  be  tested  then  is  that  the  A  of 
any  element  which  give  its  doublet  or  triplet  separations  are  multiples  of  a  quantity 
proportional  to  the  square  of  the  atomic  weight.  We  will  denote  this  by  $  =  qu?. 
It  will  be  convenient,  in  general,  to  deal  with  the  360  quantity,  and  S  will  be  used  to 
denote  this.  If  other  multiples  are  dealt  with  as  units  a  subscript  unit  will  be  used 
giving  the  multiple  of  the  90.  Thus  <?,  denotes  the  smallest,  St  =  542710*,  and  so  on. 
The  results  are  given  in  Table  I.  below. 

The  value  of  A  is  obtainable  as  the  difference  of  two  decimals  with  six  significant 
figures.  It  is  convenient  therefore  to  tabulate  the  values  of  10"A.  The  exactness  of 
the  calculated  value  depends  on  (l)  the  correctness  of  the  adopted  value  of  S(o°), 
(2)  the  exactness  with  which  v  is  measured,  and  (3),  when  expressed  in  terms  of  70*, 
the  exactness  of  the  value  of  W  or  the  atomic  weight.  In  the  case  of  the  latter  the 
value  W/100  =  w  is  used  and  the  values  of  ItfA/iv3  are  tabulated.  The  method 
adopted  may  best  be  seen  by  taking  an  actual  example,  say  that  of  calcium.  The 
values  of  •»,,  va  as  found  by  least  squares  from  the  S-series  are  105'89,  52'09.  The 
value  of  S(oo)  as  given  in  Table  I.  of  [II.]  is  33983'45,  and  the  correct  value  is 
supposed  to  be  £  larger.  The  numbers  33983'45,  34089'34,  34141'43  are  then  thrown 
into  the  form  N/Da,  and  the  denominators  are  1796470,  1793679,  1792310,  giving 
for  differences  A,  =  '002791,  Aa  =  '001369,  which  are  tabulated  as  2791,  1369.  The 
corrections  for  the  error  £  are  found  to  be  — '2f  and  — '!£  Moreover,  the  last  digits 
of  10*D  may  be  '5  wrong  and  the  value  of  the  A  be  ±1  out.  In  cases  where  the  v 
are  known  to  three  decimal  places,  the  calculations  are  carried  out  with  9-figure 
logarithms,  and  the  values  of  A  determined  without  this  ambiguity.  The  values  of  v 
may  be  wrong  by  dv,  i.e.,  \05'89  +  dv,  &c.  This  will  produce;  ;i  variation  in  A,  of 
26'Sdv — in  general  dv  is  a  fraction  <'l.  Thus 

A,  =  2791±l-'2£+26'3cZ»<. 
*  See  Table  I.  of  Part  II. 


326 


DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 


The  atomic  weights  are  supposed  to  be  those  given  by  BRAUNER,*  +x,  where  x  is 
a  number  to  be  added  to  the  fourth  significant  figure  in  BRATTNER'S  value.  BRAUNER 
gives  for  Ca  40'124.  A,  is  then  divided  by  (-40124)". 

The  result  is 

A,  =  (17336-1  ±6-22-l'24£+  163^,-8'64a;)ty2. 

=  48(361>169±-13--025£+3-4cZ»'1-'180a;)wa. 

Table  I.  gives  the  values  for  those  elements  in  which  the  series  have  been 
established.  The  second  column  contains  the  atomic  weight  as  given  by  BRAUNER, 
except  for  the  few  belonging  to  volumes  of  ABEGG'S  '  Handbuch '  not  yet  published, 
with  estimated  possible  error  beneath.  In  the  third  column  the  top  number  gives 
v  and  the  second  10'A.  For  triplets  there  are  therefore  two  sets.  The  fourth  column 
gives  lO^A/MT1,  and  the  multiples  of  which  it  is  composed.  In  general  the  360  ratio 
is  taken,  but  in  several  cases  it  is  necessary  to  take  2x90  or  180  and  1  x  90.  The 
second  line  of  columns  5,  6,  7,  8  gives  the  coefficient  of  the  error  corrections  to  be 
applied  to  this  number  360,  or  180,  &c.,  as  the  case  may  be,  and  the  upper  line  of 
figures  gives  the  maximum  errors  estimated,  which  have,  in  general,  been  less  than 
those  permissible  by  the  observations.  The  last  column  gives  the  difference  between 
361 '8  and  the  factor  given  in  the  .fourth  column,  except  that  when  it  is  not  the 
4  x  90  term  it  is  brought  up  to  it  by  multiplying  by  2  if  it  is  180  and  4  if  90.  The 
maximum  errors  are  also  attached. 

In  many  cases  it  will  be  seen  that  the  number  of  significant  figures  in  the 
calculated  numbers  is  larger  than  in  the  data  from  which  they  are  derived.  In  these 
cases  the  number  of  significant  figures  in  the  data  must  be  supposed  to  be  made  up 
to  the  proper  number  by  the  addition  of  zeros.  This  enables  new  calculated  values 
to  be  determined  when  the  data  are  improved  without  the  trouble  of  recalculation. 

TABLE  I. — Evaluation  of  S  and  of  m. 

Notation. — W  =  atomic  weight ;  qw*  =  §  with  w  =  (atomic  weight)/ 100  ;  £  error 
in  n,, ;  dv,  error  in  v ;  x,  error  in  w  on  the  fourth  significant  figure. 


W. 

v,  10«A. 

gw2,  mS. 

±1. 

-£ 

dv. 

-x. 

361-8  +  . 

Na 

22-99* 

17-175 

14027-96 

0 

i 

0 

•2 

"2 

2 

743-0 

155x90-50 

0 

•021 

5-21 

•078 

•141 

K 

39-097 

57-87 

19224-86 

1 

•5 

•3 

•92 

3 

2939 

53x362-72 

•012 

•037 

6-26 

•142 

3-22 

*  ABEGG,  '  Handbuch  der  Anorganischen  Chemie.' 


I>i;     W.    M.    HICKS:    A    CRITICAL   STUDY   OF   SPECTRAL   SKHII.S. 


327 


TABLE  I.  (continued). 


W. 

v,  10«A. 

yw*,  roS. 

±1. 

-f 

dr. 

-X. 

361-8  +  . 

Rb 

85-445 

237-54 

17715-86 

1 

•3 

•5 

-•40 

5 

12935 

49x361-40 

•003 

•022 

1-52 

•084 

•56 

Ce 

132-623 

553-80 

18449-48 

1 

•4 

•07 

-•06 

7 

32551 

51x361-74 

0 

•025 

•65 

•96 

•33 

Cu 

63-55 

248-49 

18075-8 

5 

•4 

1 

•04 

1 

7311 

50x361-84 

•05 

•02 

1-44 

•115 

•80 

Ag 

107-88 

920-61 

23879-34 

10 

•02 

• 

0 

•01 

27791 

66x361-81            '006 

•017 

•39 

•33                             '2 

Au 

197-20 

3815-52 

. 

7 

113961+  Sly 

8  1*36  1-80 

Mg 

24-362 

40-90 

14389-05 

16-91 

3 

•02 

5 

•19 

2 

854 

159x90-497 

•423 

•010       8-79 

•075 

1-00 

19-89 

6992-33 

•04 

1-78 

415 

77x90-89 

•219 

•003 

4-57       -075 

3-12 

A!+A,  = 

59x362-36 

Ca 

40-124          105-89 

17336-1 

6 

•1 

5 

-    -63 

5 

2791 

48x361-169 

•129 

•025 

3-4 

•180 

1-52 

52-09 

8503-4 

•1 

-    -24 

1369 

47x180-923 

•129 

•013 

3-48 

•090 

1-00 

Aj  +  A,  = 

143x180-696 

Sr 

87-65 

394-35 

15401-6 

4 

•2 

3 

•59 

3 

11835 

85x181-195 

•015 

•008 

•46       -041 

•72 

186-93 

7200-4 

•1 

-1-78 

5533 

20x360-02 

•065 

•019        1-95       -083 

•585 

A!+A,  = 

125x180-82 

Ba 

137-45 

878-21 

15528-2 

lOt 

•2 

•6 

-    -68 

6 

29328 

43x361-121 

•012 

•019 

•41 

•526 

•600 

370-33 

6340-96 

1      '2 

+    -54 

11976 

35x181-170 

•015 

•017 

•49 

•263 

•882 

Ai  +  A,  - 

121x180-74 

Ra 

226-4             2050-26 

18077-16 

lot        t 

t 

-    -257 

92658 

50x361-543 

•004 

•023          -023 

•32 

2t 

832-001 

6709-3 

•86 

34390 

37x181-33 

A,+A,  - 

137x180-92 

DR    W.    M.    HICKS:    A    OWTIOAl   STUDY   OF   Sl'KCTKAL    SKIMKS. 


TABLE  I.  (continued). 


W.             v,  10"A. 

jw2,  rofi. 

±1. 

-£ 

dv. 

-x. 

361-8  +  . 

Zn 

65-40 
3 

388-905 
7204-42 
190-093 
3486-20 

16843-68 
31x543-334 
8150-74 
15x543-383 

0 
0 

1 
•015 

•015 

0 
0 

3 
•135 

•135 

•423 

•420 
•456 
•420 

Ai  +  A2  = 

46x543-356 

Cd 

\\-l-3 

1 

1170-848 
23105-56 
541-892 
10368-54 

18321-33 
lOlix  180-504 
8221-64 
91x90-348 

0 
0 

•3 

•007 

•003 

0 
•15 

•16 

1 
•321 

•160 

-    -8 
•646 
-    -408 
-•644 

AJ+AS  = 

49x541-50 

Eu 

151-93 
3 

2630-5 
51223 

22191-06 
123  x  180-41 

101 

•007 

3 

•068 

•3 

•236 

-    -98 
•68 

1004 

7940-57 

1 

-    -94 

18329 

22x360-93 

•013 

•136 

•472 

•39 

A,  +  A2  = 

333x90-485 

Hg 

200-3 
3 

4630-648 
87814-99 

21888-03 
121  x  180-892 

0 

2 
•013 

0 
•078 

3 
•354 

-    -015 
2-12 

1767-01 

7478-05 

•002 

•3 

-1-41 

30002-3 

83x90-096 

•0026 

•05 

•091 

1-15 

Aj  +  As  = 

54x543-816 

Al 

11-10 

112-15 

23884 

3 

•02 

5 

•079 

5 

1754 

66x361-879 

•21 

•012 

3-21 

•266 

1-635 

Ga 

69-9 

826-10 

27715 

1 

•10 

30 

-1-87 

3               13498 

77x359-93 

•026 

•Oil 

•435 

•103 

3-17 

In 

IU'8 

2212-38 

28593-88 

1 

•25 

5 

•147 

5 

37684 

79.x  361-947         -01 

•117 

•165 

•630 

3-32 

Tl 

204-04 

7792-39              32223-62 

0 

•03        -5 

•263 

5 

134154 

89x362-063 

•002 

•012 

•047 

•355 

•18 

Sc 

44-7 

320-80                  36714 

1 

50 

-    -086 

5 

7140 

101^x361-714 

•05 

•014 

1-136 

•165 

9-45 

or     6404 

91x361-89 

He 

3-99 

1-007 

20860 

0 

5? 

•35 

33-377 

58x361-45 

0 

0 

•355 

•180 

1 

I)H.    W.    M.    HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY   OF  SPECTRAL  SKRIKS. 


TABLE  I.  (continued). 


vv. 

v,  10«A. 

„,* 

±1. 

-t 

dv. 

-x. 

361-8  +  . 

0 

16 

:!  •  65")         r 

6692 

•03 

0 

-    -01 

171-3    ln,,,l       18$  x  361  -79 

2-11 

1-13 

100 

:. 

2-O.S  p                 3714-9 

•03 

0 

1-0 

95       J          I 

41  x  90-20 

•95 

•34 

25 

2 

'62\0" 

34     ;( 

145, 

s 

32-07 

17-96 

10150-85 

10 

•1 

•34 

1044 

28x362-14 

•35 

•019 

20-14 

•226 

3 

11-21 

6329-7 

•46 

651 

35x180-67 

•21 

•009 

10-05 

•113 

1-5 

A1  +  A,- 

91  x!81-l 

Se 

79-2 

103-70 

10192 

•2 

201          2-20 

6392 

28x364-00 

•057 

•034 

3-r. 

•092                        31 

44-69 

4363-4 

1-81 

2737               12x363-61 

•057 

•04 

4-08 

•092                        31 

A1  +  A,= 

161x90-40 

Data  on  which  the  Table  is  based. 

Na.  The  limit  is  24476-11.  It  is  the  limit  found  in  [I.]  corrected  by  the  result  of  ZiCKENDRAirr's 
measurements  of  the  high  orders  of  NaS.  The  value  of  v  adopted  is  that  deduced  from  FAIIKY  and 
I'KHOT'S  interferometer  measurements  of  the  D-lines  using  9-figure  logarithms.  Consequently,  the  results 
are  more  reliable  than  would  otherwise  bo  expected  from  such  a  low  atomic  weight.  But  on  this  point, 
see  below  (p.  331). 

The  limit  for  K  is  21964-44 — corrected  from  the  value  in  [I.]  by  addition  of  1-06  as  indicated  by 
ZICKKNDRAHT'S  observations.  The  value  of  v  is  very  ill-determined.  A  value  of  v  =  57-73  would  make 
q  =  361  •  80.  SAUNDERS'  results  for  S  (3)  give  v  =  57  •  75,  and  K.R.'s  for  S  (4)  give  57  •  60  ±  •  30.  The 
value  in  the  table  is  that  used  in  [I.]  57'87±1.  The  limits  for  Rb  and  Cs  are  those  given  in  [I.]  for 
S  ( oo  ),  viz.,  20869-73  and  19671-48. 

Cu.    S  ( oo  )  =  31515-48. 

Ag.  D  ( oo )  =  30644  •  60,  found  from  first  three  lines.  FABRY  and  PKROT  have  measured  by  the 
interferometer  Dn  (2)  and  DJI  (2)  and  K.R.'s  are  extremely  close  to  these.  They  have  been  taken  as 
correct  to  -001  A.U.  The  lines  DU  and  Dn  are  so  close  that  their  difference  of  wave  number  as  given 
by  KAYSER  and  RUNOK  are  prok-ibly  of  the  same  order  of  exactness.  We  may  regard,  therefore, 
K.  and  R.'s  DU  -  DU  and  F.  and  R.'s  D^  -  DH  as  quite  exact  up  to  the  second  decimal  place.  This  gives 
v  —  920 -61.  It  cannot  be  uncertain  to  more  than  a  few  units  in  the  first  decimal.  A  more  correct  value 
is  obtained  below  (p.  404). 

The  limits  of  the  2nd  and  3rd  groups  of  elements  are  those  given  in  [II.].  In  the  cases  of  Zn,  Cd,  Hg, 
the  interferometer  measurements  of  FABRY  and  PEROT  are  used,  except  v-t  for  Cd  and  Hg,  with  9-figurc 
logarithms  in  order  to  get  an  extra  significant  figure,  their  readings  being  reduced  to  ROWI.AMI'S  si-.-ili- 
by  HAKTMANN'S  factor  1-000034.  In  these  cases  the  values  of  v  may  be  taken  as  practically  correct 
to  -001  A.U. 

For  Sc,  see  Appendix  I. 

VOL,  COXIII. — A.  2    U 


:; .-.,.  DR.  W.  M.  HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

He.  Limit  given  in  [I.J  which  is  practically  exact,  v  =  1  -007  is  given  by  PASOHEN  as  a  result  of  all 
hia  readings  and  is  probably  not  more  than  '002  in  error.  Consequently,  the  numbers  for  He  have  weight 
in  spite  of  its  low  atomic  weight. 

0.  The  limit  is  23204-00.  Although  v},  v2  are  known  with  fair  accuracy,  the  possible  proportional 
errors  are  considerable,  so  that  the  data  have  small  weight.  The  limit  for  the  doublet  series  is  21204  with 
v  =  •  62.  The  values  are  still  more  indefinite. 

S.     Limit  20106.     The  D  series  give  20110.     This  gives  a  considerable  range  of  uncertainty. 

Se.  Limit  19275-10.  The  atomic  weights  for  0,  S,  and  Se  are  those  of  the  International  Committee 
of  1910. 

The  table  shows  at  once  that  the  two  groups  which  give  doublet  series  agree  in 
giving  the  A  as  multiples  of  a  number  close  to  861'Sw1.  Group  II.,  giving  the  triplet 
series,  require  in  several  cases  multiples  of  9CH02  or  180w2.  It  is  curious  that  the 
groups  which  first  indicated  this  relation  do  not  show  it  so  markedly  and  with  so 
little  doubt  as  the  doublet  series,  in  which  by  themselves  it  would  probably  never 
have  been  noticed.  There  seems  to  be  some  kind  of  displacement  with  the  middle 
lines  of  the  triplets.  If,  for  consideration,  the  values  of  A^Aa  be  taken,  this 
irregularity  disappears,  and,  moreover,  with  the  larger  observed  quantities,  the 
proportional  errors  will  be  less. 

If  we  agree  to  look  upon  the  361  as  the  normal  type,  and  for  numerical  comparison 
multiply  the  90  by  4  and  the  180  by  2,  and,  if  further,  the  results  are  supposed  to  be 
weighted  by  the  estimated  limits  of  variation  assigned  in  the  last  column  of  the 
table,  the  method  of  least  squares  gives  for  the  value  of  q  =  S/w2 — 

Group  1 361-900, 

,,  II 361720, 

»  HI 362-051, 

All  three  groups 361'890. 

In  Groups  II.  and  ILT.  it  is  possible  too  much  weight  has  been  given  to  Hg,  va,  and 
Tl.  We  will  take  as  the  preliminary  value  for  q  that  of  silver,  viz.,  361 '81,  which  is 
practically  that  of  the  general  weighted  mean.  The  true  value  cannot  vary  much 
from  this— probably  less  than  '2.  With  this,  the  subsidiary  values  become  180'90±  '1 
and  90'45  ±'05. 

It  is  seen  that  in  the  doublet  groups  all  the  elements  can  come  within  this  limit. 

In  fact,  with   the  exception   of  K   and   Ga,  they  come   extremely  close.      Ga  is 

spectroscopically  uncertain  as  well  as  in  its  atomic  weight,  and  the  uncertainty  of  K 

s  due  to  the  uncertainty  in  its  value  of  „.     In  the  triplet  groups  also,  all  calculated 

from  A,  +  AS  have  possible  variations  which  will  bring  them  within,  although  the 

not  so  marked  as  for  the  doublet  elements.     The  sequence  formula 'are 

itablished  in  Groups  I.  and  III.,  but  there  are  uncertainties  in  Group  II.  which 

•equire  clearing  up.    In  this  relation  also,  the  table  shows  slight  regular  variations 

as,  e.g.,  A,  and  As  err  from  the  general  mean  in  different  directions,  but  in  these  cases 


DR   W.   M.'  HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  331 


the  values  of  A,  +  A3  come  much  closer  to  it.  The  values  of  (A,  +  A;,)/t^  are  therefore 
added  to  the  table.  It  is  clear,  however,  that  when  the  spectroscopic  observations 
are  good,  the  relation  here  established  will  enable  very  accurate  measures  of  the 
atomic  weight  to  be  obtained.  In  fact,  with  the  possible  accuracy  attainable  in 
spectroscopic  measurements,  it  may  be  hoped  to  obtain  far  more  reliable  values  of  these 
constants  than  by  weighing,  except  in  those  cases  where  they  are  small.  The  table, 
for  example,  affords  considerable  support  for  BRAUNER'S  estimates,  except,  possibly, 
in  the  Mg  group,  where  the  irregularities  are  due  to  spectral  causes.  The  case  of  Zn 
may  be  taken  as  an  example  here.  Its  spectral  values  are  very  good,  it  shows  with 
w  =  65'40  the  multiple  543'357  instead  of  542'70±'30.  If  the  excess  is  due  to  the 
value  of  the  atomic  weight,  it  should  be  '048  larger,  which  would  be  allowable  within 
BRAUNER'S  estimates  to  bring  it  to  the  adopted  value  of  q,  i.e.,  w  =  65*448.  This  is 
more  fully  considered  below.  The  numbers  for  Se  also  seem  to  show  that  79'2  is  too 
small  for  its  atomic  weight.  79'40  would  make  q  for  A,  =  362'16  and  for  Aa  =  36177, 
and  the  spectral  uncertainties  would  account  for  the  outstanding  differences. 

If  $i  is  written  for  ^3,  it  may  be  noticed  that  the  values  of  the  A  for  the  first  of 
each  sub-group  may  be  written  — 

i.  ii.  iii.  vi. 

Na.  Cu.  Mg.*  Zn.  Sc.  Al.  S. 

1553,      50  x43,  32x53,      31x63,  52x73,      33x83,  8x143, 

and,  moreover,  the  same  multiples  of  3,  recur  in  several  of  the  same  group,  e.g., 
A,  +  A2  for  Zn,  Cd,  and  Hg,  and  A,  for  Eu  are  all  multiples  of  63,,  also  the  53,  occurs 
in  Mg,  Sr,  Ba,  and  Ra.  Analogy  would  lead  to  a  corresponding  33,  for  Na.  The 
values  of  the  atomic  weight  and  the  doublet  separations  of  Na  are  known  with  great 
accuracy,  and  no  possible  value  given  to  £  could  change  the  multiple  from  155  to  156 
or  153.  The  only  loophole  for  an  explanation  may  be  that  the  value  of  v  as  found  by 
FABRY  and  PEROT  comes  from  the  Principal  series,  and  that  VP,(l)  is  not  really 
S(oo).  This  latter  point  has  been  discussed  in  [I.]  and  also  in  [II.,  p.  38].  It  is 
equivalent  to  a  considerable  change  in  S  (  o°  ).  To  obtain  a  value  156  or  52  x  3  would 
require  an  increase  of  '07  in  v,  i.e.,  to  17  '25,  Such  a  value  would  be  quite  well  in 
consonance  with  the  measures  of  SAUNDERS  and  of  K.  and  R.  for  other  doublets,  e.g., 
D(2)  17'30  (S.),  S(3)  17'22±'26  (K.R),  S(4)  17'05±'38  (K.R.),  P(l)  17'20  (K.R.). 
But  FABRY  and  PEROT'S  values  for  P(l)  —  independently  verified  by  Lord  RAYLEIGH  — 
would  seem  conclusive  against  this  value,  unless  F.  and  P.'s  apply  only  to  VP  (l) 
and  17'25  to  S  (  »  ).  This  would  correspond  to  a  lateral  displacement  of  3,  (see  below) 
between  VP  (l)  and  S  (  oo  ). 

S  and  Se  both  give  8  x  143,  which  falls  in  line  with  the  other  sub-groups.     In  fact, 

1  This  is  the  value  first  deduced  when  the  international  system  of  atomic  weights  was  used.     It  is 
'^i  more  than  that  in  the  table.    The  question  is  considered  below. 

2  T7  2 


,„;. 


M     NICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SEKIKS. 


,1,.,,,,,,.  tin-  *kf  of  the  group,  the  sub-groups  would  be  based  on  (2n  +  l),\  :.ml 
(2n  +  2)  t,     This  would  leave  J,  and  2J,  for  group  0.     He,  as  is  seen,  may  IK-  cither. 

The  foregoing  evidence  is,  I  think,  conclusive  that  the  atomic  weight  terms  are 
multiples  of  a  quantity  very  close  to  one  quarter  of  361'8w».  Before  attempting  .... 
existing  knowledge  to  obtain  a  closer  value  to  this  quantity,  it  will  be  desirable  to 
consider  certain  other  ways  in  which  the  atomic  weight  plays  a  part,  and  which  will 
provide  further  data  for  its  more  exact  determination.  As  it  will  be  convenient  to 
have  a  name  for  these  quantities  which  seem  to  have  a  real  existence,  the  word  "  oun  " 

(u>v)*  is  suggested. 

The  curious  irregularities  in  the  value  of  the  oun  noticeable  in  the  elements  of  the 
2nd  group  in  connection  with  the  separate  A!  and  A2  values,  whilst  the  values  found 
from  A,  +  A2  are  normal  is  worth  examining  in  closer  detail.  The  values  of  Vi  +  va 
given  in  the  table  are  deduced  from  the  sums  of  vlt  vy,  each  determined  independently 
by  least  squares  from  the  best  observations.  If  the  values  of  »i  +  va  are  determined 
directly  the  values  are  slightly  different,  which  is  natural  as  they  are  found  from 
selected  pairs.  The  old  values  and  the  values  thus  found  are  collected  here,  and  with 
them  the  values  of  S/iv*. 


New  . 
Old    . 

New  . 
Old    . 

New  . 
Old 


Mg. 
6079(362-36) 


Ca. 

158'Gl  (361-45) 


St. 

581-21(361-60) 


6079(362-36)  157'98  (361'39)  58T28  (361*64) 

Ba.  Ra.  Zn. 

1248'85(361-56)  .2882'26(361I84)  578'998  (362'23) 

1248-54(361-48)  2882'26  (361'84)  578'998  (362'23) 

Cd.  Eu.  Hg. 

1712-84(362-41)  2634'5(36r94)  6397'53  (362'46) 

171274(362-39)  2634'5  (361'94)  6397'66  (362'57) 


It  will  be  shown  later  that  spectroscopically  Mg  belongs  rather  to  the  Zn  sub-group 
than  to  the  Ca.  The  same  tendency  is  exhibited  here.  The  more  probable  values  of 
fi  +  v-j,  have  brought  the  oun  more  closely  to  equality  with  36T60W2  for  the  Ca 
sub-group,  and  with  362"4  for  the  Mg  and  the  Zn  sub-group.  The  value  of  vl  for  Eu 
may  be  2633*5  instead  of  2630'5,  and  if  so,  its  value  of  the  oun  would  come  to 
362*34.  If  the  variations  in  the  value  of  the  oun  had  been  more  irregularly 
distributed,  it  might  have  been  natural  to  assign  the  variations  (small  as  they  are)  to 
errors  in  the  value  of  the  atomic  weight.  But  this  does  not  seem  justified  unless 
there  are  chemical  reasons  whereby  atomic  weights  in  any  particular  group  have  a 
liability  to  be  all  over-estimated  or  all  under-estimated.  In  view  of  the  latter 


'  The  pronunciation  of  oun  will  be  the  same  in  the  chief  European  languages. 


I>K.   W.   M.    HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SEltlES.  :; :::: 

|K»s.sil)ility  it  may  be  well  to  determine  tin-  amount  of  such  error  required  t<>  bring, 
Kjiy,  the  valur  'ICi'J't  to  ;{<>rK,  ami  :;i;rCi  to  3G1'9,  as  it  is  prol  table  the  true  value  of 
the  ratio  lies  I tetween  361'8  and  3G1''J.  The  former  requires  an  increase  in  atomic 
weight  of  raW»  an(l  the  latter  a  decrease  of  ^faf  of  the  accepted  values.  The 
following  would  be  the  changes  in  atomic  weight  required : — 

Ca.  Sr.  Ba.  Mg.          Zn.  CM.          Hg. 

-'025       -'036       -'052  +'02;     +'04       +'09      +'2 

According  to  the  estimates  of  accuracy  given  by  BliAUNEK  the  changes  for  Mg  and 
Ca  are  quite  impossible,  for  Zn  just  possible,  and  for  the  others  possible.  In  the  case 
of  Mg  and  Ca,  however,  small  errors  in  vl-\-v3  are  considerable  proportional  errors 
and  the  deviations  may  be  caused  by  these.  It  is  necessary  to  have  these  estimates 
before  us.  Notwithstanding  them,  the  close  agreement  of  the  numbers  in  each  set, 
and  the  difference  between  the  two  sets  must  produce  the  conviction  that  the 
differences  are  real,  and  are  not  due  to  errors  either  in  the  spectroscopic  measure- 
ments or  the  atomic  weight  determinations. 

In  the  table  the  multiples  given  are  those  which  give  the  oun  most  closely.  An 
inspection,  however,  shows  that  in  each  element  there  is  some  disturbing  influence 
affecting  the  A,  and  A3  in  opposite  directions.  Moreover,  the  sum  of  the  multiples 
chosen  are  in  certain  cases  not  the  multiple  taken  for  A,  +  A.,,  and  this  should  clearly 
be  so.  This  happens  in  Cd,  Eu,  and  Hg.  There  is  apparent  a  general  rule  that  c,  is 
too  small  and  va  is  too  large,  the  deviation  increasing  with  the  atomic  weight.  The 
discrepancy  is  equivalent  to  a  transference  from  the  true  A,  to  the  true  Aa. 
Evidently  the  transfer  in  Cd,  Eu,  and  Hg  has  been  so  large  as  to  increase  A2  by 
more  than  <$,,  so  that  the  closest  multiple  now  appears  to  be  too  large  by  unity.  If 
the  multiples  in  Aa  be  diminished  by  unity,  the  sum  is  equal  to  that  for  A,  +  A3,  and 
the  discrepancy  between  the  ouns  from  A,  to  Aa  increases  in  a  regular  order.  A 
similar  change  has  occurred  in  Sr,  only  here  while  the  multiple  of  A,  has  apparently 
increased,  that  of  A!  has  apparently  decreased.  If  the  ratio  A;, :  A,  be  taken  as 
79  :  171  in  place  of  80  :  170  the  discrepancy  again  falls  into  order  with  the  others. 
With  these  changed  ratios  the  values  become 

Sr 171x90'OG8  79x91*144 

Cd 203x90-252  90x91*351 

Eu  ...'..  246x90*205  87x9T27 

Hg 242x90-446  82x91'17 

This  transference  must  take  place  in  the  Da(oo)  =  Sa(o°)  term.  The  values  are 
given  in  the  following  table  in  which  the  first  column  gives  the  value  of  Aa :  A,,  the 
second  the  value  of  the  transference,  the  fourth  the  transference  in  vt  to  vtt  the  fifth 
the  new  value  of  A2,  and  the  third  and  sixth  are  as  explained  later  : — 


DR.  W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERll.s. 


A,:  A,. 

* 

«.t 

* 

A2. 

SN. 

9 

Sr 
Ba 

77  :  159 
47:96 
79:171 
35:86 
37  •  100 

•96 
1-9 
44-4 
29-0 
77-76 

•180 
•130 
•639 
•1698 
•1678 

•05 

•05 
1-49 
•90 
1-84 

414-0 
1367-4 
5488-9 
11950-3 
34312-2 

0 
0-16 
5-20 
3-34 
8-13 

Zn 
Cd 
Eu 

Hg   { 

15:31 
90  :  203 
87  :  246 
41:121 
82  :  243 

0 
87-81 
157-8 
182-7 
274-46 

0 
•7714 
•7577 
•5030 
•7563 

0 
4-53 
8-53 
10-47 
15-72 

3486-20 
10282-7 
18171-2 
29817-7 
29725-6 

0 
11-86 
21-76 
25-64 
38-50 

What  is  the  nature  of  the  modification  ?     Perhaps  the  simplest  explanation  to  test 

is  that  a  fraction  of  J,  is  transferred.     The  third  column  gives  the  fraction  of  ^  which 

is  equal  to  the  transfer.     It  is  noticed  at  once  that  the  two  groups  fall  into  two 

separate  sets.     With  the  exception  of  Sr,  the  fraction  in  the  first  is  about  '17.     Mg 

and  Ca  can  both  fit  in  with  this,  for  the  values  are  so  small  that  they  depend  on 

decimals  in  the  value  of  A1}  A3,  and  therefore  beyond  our  significant  figures.     In  Ca, 

indeed,  evidence  is  given  later  that  A2  is  somewhat  higher  and  would  bring  the  ratio 

close  to  '18.     But  Sr  is  quite  out  of  step  with  the  others.     Zn  has  no  transfer,  Cd 

and   Eu   are  equal,  but  Hg  is  5030.     If  the  ratio  in  Hg  be  taken  to  be  82  :  243 

however,  the  fraction  agrees  with  those  of  Cd  and  Eu.     The  Hg  oun  is  then  361'43w* 

in  place  of  362'54  and  closer  to  the  mean  value,  and  as  will  be  shown  later  there  is 

evidence  for  the  new  value  of  A3  (see  p.  397).     If  this  explanation  is  valid  it  must  be 

possible  to  bring  Sr  into  the  scheme  with  a  transfer  of  11  '7,  but  it  is  difficult  to  see 

how  this  can  be  done.     '639  is  about  four  times  too  great,  in  other  words,  where  the 

others  are  modified  by  a  fraction  of  Slt  Sr  is  modified  by  the  same  fraction  of  S.     The 

above  arrangement  brings  Mg  into  the  Ca  group  and  upsets  the  law  whereby  its  first 

A,  should  be  a  multiple  of  5^.     As  this  law  seems  to  have  a  considerable  weight  of 

evidence   in   its   favour,   and   moreover,   as   will  be   seen   shortly,  Mg   tends  to   go 

spectroscopically  with  the  Zn  group,  it  may  be  well  to  see  the  result  of  keeping 

A,  =  405  and  the  ratio  A3  :  A,  =  19  :  40.     This  will  require  a  transfer  of  about  6*3 

with   a   considerable   uncertainty   owing   to   the   small   values  of  A3   and    A,,  and 

A3  =  4087.     With  this  the  fraction  of  Sl  is  T1727.     To  bring  to  the  same  fraction  as 

in  Cd  the  transfer  should  be  about  4,  which  the  uncertainty  in  6  '3  is  not   great 

enough  to  permit.     As  the  fraction  77  is  of  the  order  1  —  "215  it  suggests  that  the 

modification  is  produced  by  adding  Sl  to  the  atomic  volume  term  in  the  sequence 


of  the  P  series,  viz.  (atomic  weight  term 


l- 


The  question  must  be  left 


open  at  present.  It  has  been  noted  that  the  arrangement  which  gives  A,  =  159^  for 
Mg  throws  it  out  of  the  rule  that  the  first  members  of  the  different  groups  are 
successive  multiples  of  ^.  When  the  calculations  were  first  made,  the  values  of  the 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  335 

international  atomic  weights  wen-  used,  ami  {'or  Mg  it  is  24'32  in  place  of  BRAUNER'S 
24-362.  This  clearly  gave  A,  =  160J,  and  A.  +  A,  =  237<J,  with  S  =  (362'09±'65)  w* 
the  uncertainty  '65  not  including  that  of  atomic  weight  and  being  chiefly  due  to 
uncertainty  in  vi  +  va.  The  transference  required  now  is  270,  and  the  fraction  of  <J,  is 
'502,  again  clearly  not  that  of  the  Ca  group,  but  when  account  is  taken  of  the 
uncertainty  in  vi  +  va  quite  possibly  agreeing  with  that  of  the  Zn  group.  The 
assumption  that  the  international  value  of  w  is  more  correct  than  BRAUNER'S  certainly 
gets  over  the  difficulties  mentioned  above.  But  we  are  not  justified  in  choosing  the 
values  from  the  particular  systems  which  best  suit  our  theories.  The  discrepancy 
between  the  international  and  BRAUNER'S  is  very  great  —  from  10  to  15  times 
BRAUNER'S  indication  of  his  possible  error. 

Another  suggestion  as  to  a.  possible  explanation  may  be  given.  There  have  been 
various  indications  in  [I.  and  II.]  that  small  variations  in  N  may  occur.  If  so  it  is 
possible  to  produce  the  changes  observed  by  a  small  change  SN  in  the  middle  line  of 
the  triplet.  The  necessary  changes  to  do  this  are  given  in  the  sixth  column.  The 
changes  clearly  depend  on  the  squares  of  the  atomic  weight,  for  if  they  are  expressed 
in  the  form  xw*  they  are 


Sr   .  .  .   5'20  =  6767t^  =  4x  l'564i^  Cd  .  .  .  11'86  = 

Ba  .  .  .  3'34  =  1777W2  Eu  .  .  .  2176  =  9'426w* 

Ha  ...  8'13  =  1-58610*  Hg.  .  .  38'50  =  9'596w* 

in  which  it  may  be  noticed  that  9  '426  =  6x  1'571.  Again  multiples  of  a  quantity 
depending  on  the  square  of  the  atomic  weight  enter,  and  it  is  especially  interesting 
to  note  that  the  Zn  group  are  affected  with  the  multiple  6.  If  Ca  and  Zn  show 
similar  displacements,  Ca  would  require  <5N  =  '25  in  place  of  '16  and  Zn  4'03.  Zn 
is  clearly  0,  i.e.,  is  unaffected,  but  considering  the  small  numbers  involved  in  Ca  and 
conseqtiently  large  proportional  errors,  Ca  might  well  show  '25  instead  of  '16.  The 
question  naturally  arises,  do  these  quantities  depend  in  any  way  on  the  oun  ?  Now 
any  change  in  N  may  be  supposed  to  arise  either  as  a  real  change  in  N  itself  or  an 
apparent  change  due  to  the  introduction  of  a  factor  in  connection  with  the  1/D*.  In 
other  words,  the  quantity  VD  is 

(l+/)a 


N  or     N 

•  - 


Looked  at  from  this  point  of  view,  9'426tpa  requires  N  (l  +  '000859^)  or 
N  (1  +  '000429  iv*y.  Now  55j  would  give  <000452«rl,  but  if  the  present  explanation 
is  the  true  one,  this  is  not  a  likely  value  since  it  will  not  include  the  alkaline  earths. 
A  value  6<$i  =  <0005428wa  would  be  expected.  The  Ba  value  1777  would  give 
(T000088J02),  or  practically  (!+<$,)".  It  rather  looks  as  if  this  explanation  is  a  part 
of  the  truth.  If  more  exact  measures  were  at  disposal  it  might  be  well  to  assume 


DR.   W.    M.    HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIKS. 


;:,,.,,.  ivsiilts  ;is  holding,  rccaJflBklia  l;»i  the  deaOfeiltttON  ;ni<l  dismiss  (In- 
ment  now  required.  It  may  be  noted,  however,  that  in  the  Zn  sub-group  a  factor 
(1  +xitY  in  D,  (  oo  )  would  reduce  the  calculated  oun  below  362'4w*  and  (l  -y<\)3  raise; 
it  in  the  Ca  sub-group  above  361'GOw8  and  at  the  same  time  increase  the  factors  in 
the  numbers  above  towards  (l+6J,)'and  (l  +<?,)'.  The  factors  may  of  course  enter 
«-it  her  as  (l+x$Y  or  (l- 


Collaterals. 

The  first  set  in  doublet  or  triplet  S  or  P  series  is  always  the  stronger.  The  others 
may  l>e  considered  as  receiving  a  sort  of  lateral  displacement,  by  the  atomic  weight 
term,  in  the  recognised  way,  and  may  be  called  collaterals.  This  kind  of  displacement 
is,  however,  not  confined  to  the  series  generally  recognised,  but  is  of  very  common 
occurrence,  and,  indeed,  depends  not  only  on  the  A  but  also  on  other  multiples  of  S. 
In  fact,  the  doublet  and  triplet  series  are  only  special  cases  of  a  law  of  very  wide 
application.  Some  evidence  of  its  existence  will  be  given  below.  It  will  be  sufficient 
now  only  to  refer  to  certain  points  connected  with  the  law,  and  to  a  convenient 
notation  to  represent  it.  This  kind  of  relation  was  first  noted  in  the  spectra  of  the 
alkaline  earths,*  and  as  the  lines  are  both  numerous  and  at  the  same  time  strong  and 
well  defined,  and,  therefore,  with  very  small  observation  errors,  any  arguments  based 
on  them  must  have  special  weight.  Moreover,  there  are  long  series  of  step  by  step 
displacements  involving  large  multiples  of  A  between  initial  and  final  lines,  so  that 
we  may  feel  some  certainty  that  these  large  multiples  are  real  and  not  mere 
coincidences. 

As  a  compact  notation  is  desirable  the  following  has  been  adopted.  In  general  t 
the  wave  number  of  a  line  is  determined  by  a  formula  of  the  form  N/D^-N/D,,,2,  and 
lateral  displacements  may  be  produced  by  the  addition  (or  subtraction)  of  multiples 
of  S,  say  xS  or  xA,  to  D,  or  Dm.  This  is  indicated  by  writing  (xS)  to  the  left  of  the 
symbol  of  the  original  line  when  it  is  added  to  D,,  and  to  the  right  when  added  to  Dm. 
Thus  CaS1(2)  is  6162'46.  So  far  as  numerical  agreement  goes  G439'36  is  a  collateral 
of  this  represented  by  (2A,  +  10A2)  CaS,  (2)  (  +  A2).  This  means  that  whereas,  see  [II.], 

Wave  number  of  CaS,  (2)  =  7    -^-  J*_ 

(1796470)2     (2-4S4994)2 

Wave  number  of  6439'36  =  -,  -  —  _        __  ^  _  , 

(1796470  +  2A.  +  10A,)2     (2'484994  +  Aa)2 

N  N 


(1-815732)2     (2'48G362)2< 

»  A  note  on  this  relationship  was  given  at  the  Portsmouth  meeting  of  the  British  Association,  see 
'Report,  B.  A.' (1911),  p.  342. 

t  Though  not  always,  as  I  hope  to  show  in  a  future  communication. 


DR.   W.    M.    HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STl'hY    OF  SPECTRAL   SERIFS.  337 

going  further  it  is  desirable  here  to  consider  tin-  nature  of  the  cumulative 
effects  produced  by  errors  in  the  values  of  «5,  or  of  the  limits,  in  the  course  of  a 
succession  of  step  1 1\-  sti-p  displao-ni'Mits.  There  may  I*-  a  small  ermr  in  the  starting 
point,  !-.</.,  S(o&)  in  the  alwve  example,  or  in  the  value  adopted  for  i.  We  will 
consider  these  separately,  taking  the  case  where  the  displacement  is  on  the  left,  or 
t  he  lirst  term. 

1.  The  limit  correct,  but  .  s/i</l,tti/  too  large. — Then  S  calculated  from  this  is  also 
slightly  too  large.     It  will,  however,  serve  to  identify  a  large   series  of  steps  in 
succession,  i.e.,  to  reproduce  the  successive  difVen-nr.-s  of  the  wave  numbers  of  the 
lines.     But  the  errors  will  all  be  cumulative,  and  if  the  last  line  of  a  set  be  calculated 
direct   from  the  first,  its  denominator  is  too  large  and  its  wave  number  too  small.     Tn 
this  case  a  more  correct  value  of  S  can  l)e  obtained  by  using  these  extreme  lines,  and 
this  corrected  value  must  satisfy  all  the  other  lines.      In  general  a  new  correction  will 
only  affect  an  extra  significant  figure  in  the  value  of  S. 

2.  S  correct,  but  limit   /n-otig. — In  this  case  a  slight  error  in  the  limit  will  be  of  no 
importance  unless  the  S  and  its  multiples  are  considerable;  and,  as  a  rule,  the  limits 
are  known  with  very  considerable  accuracy,  except  possibly  in  the  alkaline  earths  and 
a  few  others.     Let  us  suppose  the  limit  adopted  (say  S(»))  is  too  large,  that  is,  its 
denominator  too  small.     If  the  second   line  is  due  to  a  positive   displacement,  its 
denominator  is  larger  than  that  of  the  first,  and  the  wave  number  less.     Suppose  D,, 
D2  the  denominators  for  the  two  lines,  D2  >  I),  if  the  displacement  is  positive,  the 
separation  is  N/D,a— N/D/.     If  the  limit  is  chosen  too  large  D,  and  Da  are  chosen  too 
small,  although  D,— D,  is  correct  since  S  is  supposed  correct.     If  D,  becomes  D,— a;, 
the    error    in    the   separation    is  8N«/Dj'— SNor/D,*,   which    is   positive   since   Da   is 
supposed  >  D,,  i.e.,  the  calculated  separation  is  too  large.     If  the  displacement  is  a 
negative  one,  Da  <  D,,  the  true  separation  is  now   2N/D/— 2N/D,2  and  the  error 
2NX/D!3— 2NX/D/,  which  is  now  negative  since  D2  <  D,.     The  effect  would  be  that 
in   any  series  of  step  by  step  displacements  S  would  appear  to  require  continual 
decreases,  and  at  the  end  the  "  corrected  values "  would  not  at  all  fit  the  initial 
•  -rises.      If,  then,  it  is  found  that  when  S  is  corrected  as  in  Case  1  the  corrections 
tend    to  alter  the   former  corrected  one,  and  not  to  produce  additional  significant 
I  inures  only,  it  may  be  surmised   that    the    limit  has  been  wrongly  chosen.     It  is 
dear,  then,  that  where  there  are  a  number  of  successive  collaterals  with  a  large 
multiple  of  S  between   the   extreme   ones,  we   have  at  disposal  a  means  whereby 
much  more  accurate  values  for  S  and  the  limits  are  obtainable.     Cases  are  given 
below,  e.g.,  in  BaD. 

For  low  atomic  weights  5,  is  always  a  small  quantity  and  except  for  orders  where 
«i  =  1  or  2,  the  alteration  in  wave  number  is  small.  For  the  present  purpose  which 
is  to  obtain  proof  of  the  existence  of  the  displacements  here  indicated,  no  evidence  can 
be  admitted  in  which  the  change  in  wave  numl>er  produced  by  a  displacement  £<J,,  is 
comparable  with  the  possible  error  of  observation.  The  evidence,  therefore,  is  of 

VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  2    X 


SS8 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 


greatest  weight  when  derived  from  the  spectra  of  elements  of  high  atomic  weight,  or 
from  cases  in  which  the  displacements  are  due  to  multiples  of  A. 

It  is  possible  for  a  line  to  be  simultaneously  displaced  to  right  and  left,  as  for 
instance  CaS,  (2)  given  above.  Such  lines  exist,  but  since  there  is  a  very  considerable 
scope  for  adjustment  of  values  by  a  proper  choice  of  say  x  and  y  in  (xS)  X  (y$),  and 
specially  so  in  y  when  m  >  2,  such  cases  cannot  be  considered  as  established  unless  S  is 
very  large,  or  the  A  enter  only,  or  unless  there  is  independent  evidence  by  the  existence 
of  intermediate  steps. 

When  these  collaterals  were  first  found  it  was  noticed  that  in  general  a  positive 
displacement  seemed  in  the  majority  of  cases  to  increase  the  intensity  of  the  lines,  and 
a  negative  to  decrease  it.  This  is  clear  when  the  displacements  considered  are  those 
from  the  1st  to  the  2nd  set  of  a  doublet  series  where  the  displacement  is  a  negative 
one  and  there  is  always  a  decrease  in  intensity.  It  is  also  evident  in  the  satellites  of 
the  D  series.  Apparently,  as  will  be  shown,  the  typical  line  of  the  series  is  the 
satellite.  The  strong  line  is  a  positive  collateral  of  this  and  always  shows  a  great 
increase  of  intensity.  Although  these  facts  are  obvious  the  connection  was  not 
recognised,  until  the  relation  showed  itself  first  in  a  series  of  collaterals.  It  is,  I  think, 
safe  to  say  that  a  positive  displacement  produces  a  tendency  to  increase  of  intensity  ; 
there  may  be  other  causes  acting  so  as  sometimes  to  mask  the  effect,  but  in  general, 
where  the  rule  appears  to  be  broken,  the  suggested  displacements  should  be  regarded 
with  some  doubt.  In  so  far  as  I  have  used  this  rule  in  the  following,  the  results  are 
biassed  and  of  course  the  evidence  for  the  rule  to  that  extent  weakened. 

It  would  be  possible  to  give  here  long  lists  of  collaterals.  As,  however,  the  present 
communication  has  reference  chiefly  to  the  discovery  of  general  laws  as  a  necessary 
preliminary  to  the  more  thorough  examination  of  special  spectra,  it  will  be  sufficient 
to  refer  for  evidence  to  the  cases  which  arise  in  the  succeeding  discussion.  This  seems, 
however,  a  natural  place  to  refer  to  certain  cases  discussed  in  Parts  I.  and  II.,  where 
unexpected  deviations  occurred  between  the  calculated  and  observed  position  of  a  line 
in  the  middle  of  a  series  in  which  for  the  other  lines  the  agreement  was  especially 
good.  As  special  instances,  the  cases  of  TlSj  (4)  and  CaSj  (5)  [II,  p.  39]  may  be  taken. 
The  suggestion  that  TISj  (4)  may  be  due  to  a  transcription  error  is  not  valid,  and  was 
occasioned  by  an  oversight  in  confounding  d\  with  dn.  If  the  normal  line  be  denoted 
by  T1&!  (4),  the  observed  is  the  collateral  TlSj  (4)  (154)  giving  0-0=  -  '01  in  place  of 
- 1'21.  Similarly,  the  observed  Ca  line  is  CaS!  (5)  (-6A2)  with  O-C  =  -  '03  in  place 
of  '61.  There  are  many  examples  of  such  sudden  jumps  which  are  certainly  not  due 
to  errors  of  observation.  Several  instances  will  be  found  below  in  the  D  series. 

The  Diffuse  Series. 

To  the  question  what  is  the  positive  criterion  of  a  Diffuse  series  no  clear  answer  up 
to  the  present  has  been  given.  We  find  in  general  three  sets  of  series  associated 
together.  Two  of  these  have  the  same  limits,  the  other  a  limit  peculiar  to  itself. 


I'i;.    \V.    M.    HICKS:      \    riMTK'AI.    STI   I»V    OF    M'KCTKAI,    SKI: IKS.  339 

Tin-  Lilt'  i  is  the  Principal  series,  and  the  difference  between  the  wave  numbers  of  its 
first  line  and  of  its  limit  gives  the  limit  of  the  other  two.  Of  the  other  two  series, 
<  int-  shows  a  Zeeman  effect  of  the  same  nature  as  that  in  the  Principal.  This  is  called 
the  Sharp  series — or  (by  KAYSER  and  RUNOE)  the  2nd  associated  series.  The  third 
series  is  called  the  Diffuse — or  the  1st  associated  series.  It  has  in  fact  a  negative 
kind  of  criterion.  The  preceding  definitions  apply  to  the  three  series  in  all  elements, 
including  such  elements  as  Li,  He,  and  others  which  show  singlet  series.  When 
doublets  and  triplets  appear,  we  have  a  simple  physical  criterion  for  the  Principal 
series  in  that  it  is  that  series  in  which  the  doublets  or  triplets  converge  with  increasing 
order.  This  criterion  can  be  applied  even  when  the  1st  line  has  not  been  observed. 
In  certain  elements  the  constant  separations  are  shown  between  satellites.  In  these 
< MSOS  the  series  is  certainly  a  D-series,  at  least  in  those  recognised  up  to  the  present — 
but  further  knowledge  may  show  that  in  certain  cases  such  satellites  may  appear  in 
other  seri«  s.  •  If,  passing  beyond  the  mere  physical  appearance  of  the  series  or  their 
visible  arrangement  in  the  spectrum,  we  attempt  to  represent  their  wave  numbers  by 
formulae  of  the  recognised  types,  we  have  further  criteria  for  the  Principal  and  Sharp, 
viz.,  that  the  1st  line  of  the  Principal  may  also,  very  nearly  at  least,  be  calculated 
from  the  formula  for  the  Sharp — or  vice  versd — and  that  the  denominators  in  their 
formulae  differ,  roughly  indeed  but  sufficiently  closely  for  use  as  a  criterion,  by 
a  number  not  far  from  '5.  But  when  an  attempt  is  made  to  deal  in  the  same  way 
with  a  line  of  the  diffuse  series,  no  general  type  of  formula  has,  at  least  as  yet,  been 
found.  In  the  alkali  metals,  as  was  seen  in  [I.]  all  the  D-series  take  a  positive  value 
for  at — in  other  words,  the  fractional  parts  of  the  denominators  decrease  with 
increasing  order,  and  the  general  conclusion  might  be  drawn  that  this  was  a  common 
feature  of  all  diffuse  series.  But  the  opposite  occurs  in  the  triplet  spectra  of  the 
2nd  group  of  elements,  whilst  a  similar  rule  of  a  positive  value  of  a  recurs  in  the 
3rd  group.  This  suggests  that  the  series  giving  doublets  have  a  positive  and  triplets 
<x  negative,  but  this  is  contradicted  by  the  triplet  series  of  O,  S  and  Se,  which  behave 
in  the  same  way  as  the  doublets  of  Groups  1  and  3.  The  question  naturally  arises, 
is  there  a  typical  D-sequence  with  a  positive,  and  the  diffuse  series  in  the  2nd  group 
do  not  really  belong  to  this  type,  or  is  there  no  actual  D-sequence,  i.e.,  no  regular 
type,  of  formula  to  which  the  D-series  conform.  The  difficulty  of  finding  formulae  to 
accurately  represent  any  particular  D-series  would  point  to  the  latter  supposition, 
a  supposition  also  which  is  strengthened  when  we  study  comparatively  the  series  of 
numerical  values  of  the  denominators  found  directly  from  observations  as  is  done 
below.  In  the  case  of  the  alkalies  the  formulas  given  in  [I.]  (as  well  as  those  in  l/m3) 
do  not  reproduce  well  the  high  orders  and  are  probably  only  within  the  limits  of  error 
because  the  lines  are  so  diffuse  that  the  observation  errors  are  very  large.  In  fact 
one  of  the  few  excessive  deviations  found  in  [I.]  was  that  of  NaD  (6),  in  which  it  is 

*  K.g.,  in  ScS.,  see  Appendix  I. 
2x2 


..,,,  |,K.   w.   M.    HICKS:    A    CIMT1CAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SKRIKS. 

not  prok-il>l.-  that  the  error  is  one  of  observation.  In  Group  2  the  Zn  sub-group  can 
be  repn«|iirr<l  fairly  well  with  a  formula  in  <x/(2w-l)  in  which  a  is  negative.  M^ 
can  H!HO  be  reproduced  within  error  limits  by  a  formula  of  the  same  kind,  but  it  is 
impossible  to  do  so  for  Ca,  and  Sr  and  Ba  require  additional  terms  in  l/ma.  In 
Group  3  Al  is  quite  intractable,  and  if  really  depending  on  a  formula,  appears  to 
require  complicated  algebraic  or  circular  functions.  In  and  Tl  also  are  not  amenable 
to  formulae  in  «//»  only  or  a/m  +  P/m".  Nevertheless,  the  general  build  of  the  series 
is  so  similar  to  that  of  the  others  that  it  would  seem  probable  that  the  wave  numbers 
should  also  be  of  the  form  S(oo)— N/(wi  +  f?m)3.  If  so  it  is  possible  to  calculate  dm 
from  the  observations  and  a  comparative  study  may  throw  some  light  on  the  origin  of 
the  different  lines.  The  attempt  to  deal  with  these  series  from  the  formulae  point  of 
view,  however,  brought  out  the  fact  that  the  satellites  are  related  to  the  strong  lines 
in  a  similar  way  to  that  in  which  the  Principal  line  doublets  are,  viz.,  by  a  constant 
difference  in  the  denominators  and  that  their  differences  probably  depend  on 
multiples  of  the  "  oun,"  as  is  the  case  in  the  Principal  series.  As  the  evidence 
depends  also  on  a  comparison  of  the  numerical  values  of  dm,  this  point  will  also  be 
considered  now. 

The  actual  values  of  dm  will  depend  on  the  accuracy  of  the  value  S  (  oo )  (or  D  ( <x> )) 
of  the  limit.  In  the  calculations  below  the  most  probable  value  has  been  used  (see 
note  under  each  element)  and  the  true  value  has  been  taken  to  be  that  +  £  In  order 
to  be  free  from  mental  bias  these  have  been  in  general  taken  to  be  the  same  as  S  ( oo), 
which  involves  the  theorem  that  D(o°)  =  S(oo).  But  of  this  little  doubt  can  be  felt. 
The  true  values  of  dn  can  then  be  given  in  the  form  dm  +  kg  where  k  is  small.  For 
high  orders  of  m,  k  is  comparatively  large  and  can  only  be  used  when  £  is  very  small. 
It  is  however  generally  the  case  that  errors  made  in  this  way  are  only  a  fraction  of 
the  observational  errors. 

As  in  the  normal  type  where  there  are  no  satellites  VDj  =  VD3  =  VD3,  and  where 
there  are  satellites  VD1:J  =  VDal,  VD13  =  VD.,,,  it  is  only  necessary  to  tabulate  the 
values  of  dm  for  the  case  of  VD,  or  VDU,  VD12)  VD,:,  respectively.  When  this  is  done 
certain  regularities  are  clearly  apparent,  which  can  be  made  more  exact  by  allowing 
small  observational  errors  and  giving  a  small  permissible  value  to  £  It  would  cumber 
the  space  at  disposal  to  give  both  sets  of  values,  especially  as  it  is  possible  to  easily 
indicate  the  differences  on  the  one  set  of  tables.  Table  II.  then  gives  the  values  of  Dm 
with  the  modified  value  of  £  with  the  maximum  errors  attached  in  the  usual  way 
in  (  ),  and  the  calculated  value  given  as  a  correction  to  the  selected  value.  Thus  for 
NaD  (3),  D  (3)  =  3-986626  (l33)-289£-104,  3'986626  is  the  selected  value,  133 
possible  change  in  last  three  digits  in  this,  -289  is  change  for  £  =  + 1 ,  and  the  observed 
value  is  104  less  than  the  selected.  The  values  of  the  errors  of  observed  wave-length 
over  calculated  (O-C),  and  of  possible  observed  errors  (O)  are  given  in  each  case  on 
the  right.  The  tables  for  the  different  elements  are  collected  together  and  discussion 
of  each  is  given  later  when  considering  the  ordinal  relations  of  the  denominators. 


1)11.    W.    M.    HICKS:    A    riMTlCAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTKAL   SKIMKS. 


a  1 1 


TABU  II. 


Na. 

A  =  743.         $=  19'I7. 


D. 

0-C. 

0. 

S. 

2  -988656  (36)  -121^ 
2030  =  3A-200  ' 

K.I;. 

3  -986626(1  33)  -  289£  -104 
4A 

•02 

•03 

»» 

4  •  983654  (452)  -  565£  +  35 
44 

-  -01 

•2 

M 

5  -980682  (2248)  -  977£  -81 
17A 

•02 

•5 

'/.. 

6'9G8051(l)-1545£  +  23 
-28A 

0 

1 

7  •  988855  -2329£-  528 

8  -988857-3324$  -850 

9  -98886-456-;  -520 
10-990-6-1^ 
ll-992-7-9£ 
12-999-10-1^ 

13-986  -12-6| 

14-951  -15£ 

K. 

A  =  2939.         S  =  55-45. 


D. 

0-C. 

0. 

p. 

2-853302(38)-  100$ 

57936  -  20A-844 

s. 

3  -795366  (224)  -249$  +167 

-  -30 

•4 

9A 

K.I;. 

4  -76891  5  (74)  -494-;  -61 

•04 

•05 

„ 

5  •  754220  (452)  -  869$  +  348 

-  -11 

•15 

3A 

„ 

6-745786(1050)-  1400^+381 

-  -07 

•2 

2A 

>»» 

7-739527  (8462)  -  2115$  -I-  867 

-  -10 

1-0 

s.* 

8-723519 

L.D. 

9-731179 

L.D. 

10-686     ID  line 

*  S.  gives  v  =  61-25;  L.D.  give  59-15;  both  give 
D2  (8)  the  same.  If  we  take  this  as  correct  and  make 
v  -  57-87,  the  denominator  =  8-733756.  L.D.'s  value 
=.  8-729879. 


Na.  NaP(oo  )  ia  given  in  [I.]  =  41446- 76  ±  1  '69,  but  WOOD'S  measurements  of  the  high  orders  require 
a  value  alxnit  1-48  larger,  say,  close  to  41448-24.  Also  FABKY  and  BUISSON'S  interferometer  measure  of 
NaP(l)  give,  when  referred  to  HAKTMANN'S  It  scale,  n  =  16972-85.  Whence 

VP(1)  =  41448-24-16972-85  =  24475-39 

and  this  should  be  !>(-/.)  and  S(<x).  Further,  S(<»)  is  given  in  [I.]  as  24472'  11  ±3-84  and 
XICKKNOKAIIT'S  measures  of  high  order  require  alwut  3  or  4  more,  or,  say,  3'5,  which  is  within  allowable 
limits.  This  would  give  S(oo)  =  D(oo)  =  24475-61.  Thirdly,  D(oo),  calculated  from  m  =  3,  4,  5, 
gives  24475-20.  ZICKK.M>I:AHT'S  measures,  however,  if  exact,  require  about  2  larger.  The  three 
combined  appear  to  point  to  a  value  close  to  24475*40,  and  this  was  taken  for  calculation.  In  the 
modified  table  above,  it  was  found  Ixjtter  to  take  D(  oo)  about  1  larger,  in  the  direction  of  ZICKKNURAHT'S 
results,  and  the  table  is  therefore  based  on  24476-40.  For  Nal)(6)  ZICKKNDRAHT,  as  well  as  K.K.,  gives 
an  abnormally  great  separation.  LEHMANN'S  value  of  D\('2)  gives  243  greater,  making  1st  ordinal 
difference  =  3A.  K.R's  value  of  D(6)  gives  6-965755. 

K.  Kl',(oo)  from  [I.]  =  35006-21  ±  1  -55  and  agrees  well  with  BBVAN'S  measures  of  high  orders, 
possibly  slightly  less.  For  P,(l)  K.R  give  n=  13041-77  and  S  13042-96.  These,  then,  give  for 
D(»)  «=  S(»)  =  21964-44  or  less  (K.R.)  and  21963-25,  or  less,  (S.).  The  value  21964  has  been  taken 


PR  W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SEKIKS. 
TABLE  II.  (continued). 

Kb. 
A  =  12935.         <&  =  26377. 


D. 

0-C. 

0. 

RAN. 

2-766216  -96£ 

60669  =  2308 

S. 

3-  705547  -232£  +  0 

•00 

f 

8S8 

4  -6837  18  (234)  -468£  -26 

•05 

•20 

388 

K.R. 

5  -673688  (382)  -833£  +  22 

-  -00 

•15 

198 

)) 

6-668673  (676)  -  1352£  -  118 

•01 

•15 

158 

R.  or  S. 

7-664713-2053£-68 

0 

1 

148 

S. 

8-661017  -2963£-  70 

0 

1 

9-661017-4114^  +  391 

0 

10-6428-55^ 

ll-6464-72| 

1) 

12-635-9£ 

ce)  =  33687 -50  ±2  [I.],  and  probably  greater.  '  SEVAN'S  observations  show  slightly  larger,  say, 
about  -5,  ,'.«.,  P (  OD  )  =  33688.    Using  SAUNDERS'  for  P!  (1),  VP (1)  =  20871  •  29  =  D  ( « ). 

According  to  SAUNDERS,  RbD  shows  satellites  for  m  =  3  and  4,  giving  Dn  (3)  -  Dj2  (3)  =  2 '63  and 
D,,  (4)  -  D,2(4)  =  2-02  with  uncertainties  of  1.  These  give  differences  in  the  denominators  respectively 
of  610  and  946,  and  9Si  =  593,  HSj  =  923. 


Cs. 


A  =  32551. 


S  =  638-22. 


DH.                                                   D12. 

0-C. 

0. 

0-C. 

0. 

p. 

2  -554329  (228)  -76^-43       46^       -546989  (226)-  97 

-  -5 

3 

-1-3 

3 

308 

tl 

3  -535183  (200)  -201^  +  40       5^        -526567  (200)  +  9 

•2 

1 

•o 

1 

108, 

S. 

4  -533588  (160)  -424^  +  1        148            -524635-161 

•00 

•5 

•5 

1 

n 

5  -5331  10  (400)  -768£  +22       148             -524175-26 

R. 

6-532631-1264^  +  77           148            -523696-428 

M 

7  -532631  -1945£-  158 

D 

8-532631-2826^  +  56 

M 

9-525411-3975^ 

II 

10-52533-530^ 

n 

11-5326-70^+11 

DR.    VV.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY   OF  SPECTRAL   SEKIKS 


TAIU,K  1 1 .  (continued). 

Since  the  publication  of  [I.]  RANDAU.*  has  measured  P(l)  with  considerable  accuracy.  This,  with 
P(2,  3),  gives  PI(OO)  •=  31401-78,  and  RANDAI.I.'S  v;ilue  for  PI(!)  gives  VP(1)  -  19673-12.  BKVAN'S 
observations  show  PI(»)  about  2  larger.  Probably,  however,  this  value  for  VP(1)  is  close  to  the  true 
value  for  D(  <x  ),  and  the  calculations  are  based  on  D(  oo  )  —  19673-00. 

For  D,  (3)  LKHHANN  gives  denominators  548  larger  for  DM  and  548  less  for  D!2.  If  we  allow  S.  twice 
the  weight  of  L.  the  value  of  O  -  C  would  come  out  about  zero. 

Cu. 
A  =  7311.         &=  146-22. 


D,,.                   Dn. 

0-C. 

0. 

0-C. 

O. 

2  -979076  (43)  -120^  -6    228,    -978272  +  4 

•01 

•10 

-•01 

•05 

Ml 

3  -984047  (173)  -  288£  +  24   278,    -983060  +  30 

-  -01 

•10 

-•01 

•20 

108 

4  -985509(1)  -565^  +  35 

-•01 

1 

D(oo)  =  31515-48  found  from  K.R.'s  value  for  D(2,  3,  4). 


A  =  27791. 


S  =  421-07. 


D,,.                 D18. 

0-C. 

0. 

0-C. 

0. 

2-979583(19)  -120^  +  3   238,   -977150(19)+  12 

-  ;01 

•05 

-•03 

•05 

418, 

3-983898  (1967)  -288^+23  108,  1982891  (175)-  27 

-  -01 

1-00 

•01 

328, 

4  -987280  (7776)  -565^  -2   158,   f9«5701  (2170) 

•00 

2-00 

•00 

98, 

5-988130  (3720)  -  979£  +  46 

•00 

•50 

t  Calculated  from  D*  -  v. 

D(  oo  )  found  from  first  three  by  formula  =  30644-66,  modified  to  30644-76. 
The  limit  uncertain,  see  special  discussion  (p.  403). 

The  observation  errors  after  the  first  are  so  large  that  the  satellite  differences  might  be  also  238,,  or 
larger,  us  in  Cu. 


*  "  Zur  Kenntnis  ultrarotcr  Linieiispektra,"  '  Ann.  d.  Phys.'  (IV.),  33,  p.  743. 


N4 


DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 


TABLE  II.  (continued). 

Mg. 
A,  =  854.         A,  =  413.         S  =  21'48. 


I). 

0-C. 

0. 

p. 

1-822169  -27  -5$+  12 

-1 

1-5 

16AZ 

K.R. 

2-828774  (20)  -103$  -12 

•02 

•03 

3-831255  (79)-  256$  +  59 

•02 

•03 

3A., 

* 

4-832494(190)-514$  +  61 

•01 

•03 

2A, 

5-833320  (1808)  -  904$  -  24 

•00 

•15 

t 

6  •  833320  (42  10)  -  1  452$  -  583 

•02 

•20 

*  Calculated  from  D^i  -  n- 

t  The  observed  value  gives  v,  =  42 '87  in  place  of  the  normal  value  40-92.     If  this  be  corrected  to 
40-92,  giving  equal  weights  to  D3,  D3,  the  value  would  be  6  -833809. 

D(oo)  =  S(oo)  =  39752 -83 ±2 -73,  as  given  in  [II.],  from  the  formula  in  1/m2.     This  is  modified  in 
the  above  to  39751-08. 

Ca. 
A,  =  2791.         A,  =  1369.         S  =  58'14. 


Dn.                 DJ2.            DIS. 

0-C. 

0. 

0-C. 

0. 

0-C. 

0. 

1-947172  (8)  -33$  -4     138   -946417  (25)  +  5  88  -945952  (25)  +  20 

•5 

1-0 

-•6 

2-0 

-2-4 

3 

99A., 

3-  082696  (20)  -133$  +14    138  -081941  (20)+  11  88  -081476  (20)  -  14 

-  -02 

•03 

-  -01 

•03 

•02 

•03 

1558 

4-091707  (104)  -312$+  17    148  -090893(104)  -  17     *-090428-21 

0 

•05 

0 

•05 

•01 

•05 

0 

t5  •  09  1  707  (538)  -  598$  +  326 

-•06 

•10 

0 

16-091707  (4856)  -  1012$  -  1400 

•14 

•50 

0 

t7-091707  (7732)  -1546$  +  161 

-•02 

•50 

*  Calculated  from  D^  and  Dsl)  treating  each  as  of  equal  value. 

t  Collaterals  (see  text).     The  values  calculated  direct  from  the  observations  are  respectively  5-082736, 
6-056500,  6-976528. 


D(oo)  =  33981-85,  being  33983- 45  ±5 -8,  as  given  for  S(oo)  in  [II.],  with  1/m2  modified  by  putting 
-   -1-6. 


DR.   W.   M.    HICKS:    A    CKITICAL   STUDY   OF  SI'KCTUAL 


345 


TAHI.K  II.  (< tinned). 


St. 


A,  =  1 1835.    Aa  =  5533.    3  =  277 '89. 


D,,.                  D,*             D,j. 

0-C. 

O. 

O-C. 

0. 

O-C. 

0. 

|-'J931S4(7)-36£+l     138   •  989572  (8)-  7   88  *•  987349  +  45 

-  -3 

1-5 

1-7 

2-0 

t 

T 

6538 

3-  174741  (17)  -146£  +  15    128   •  171407  (17)  -  7   88  -189184(29)  +  16 

-  -02 

•03 

•01 

•03 

-  -02 

•05 

848 

I  Hi8084(101)-337£  +  41   158  •  1*9919  (100)  -83  88  -191693  (?)  +  597 

-  -02 

•Of) 

•01 

•05 

•30 

t 

198 

5  -203364  (963)  -  642£  +112   158  t  '  199  196  (482)  +  300  88  t'  196973(1)  -84 

-  -02 

•20 

-•06 

1 

28 

6-203919  (2539)  -1088£-  40   158  *•  199751  (?)  +  210 

•00 

•30 

-  -02 

? 

0 

7  •  203919  (2838)  -  1702£  -  1819 

•12 

•20 

0 

8-203919  (20174)  -2522^  +  5971 

-  -3 

1-0 

*  Calculated  from  D3i  -  v\  -  vt.     The  difference  might  be  7,o  =  318,. 
t  Calculated  from  l)Si  -  vt  and  D*.  -  »•,. 
J  Calculated  from  DJI  -  v\. 

D(oo)  ==  31027-25,  being  31027  '65  +  4,  as  given  for  S(oc)  in  [II.],  with  !/;«-,  modified  by  putting 


A,  =  29328. 


Ba. 

=  11970. 


=  683'2. 


D,,.                                          !>!*                                     DW- 

O-C. 

O. 

O-C. 

0. 

O-C. 

0. 

1  -825551*  \ 

2-080655    / 

3-114613(12)-137£-ll     Itf       105049(20)+  19      118      -093194  (20)  -  11 

•02 

•03 

-  -04 

•05 

•02 

•05 

648 

4-158338(8l2)-325f+24    108    •  151506  (325)  -  154    298    •  13169»  (160)  +  101 

-  -01 

•50 

•09 

•20 

-  -06 

•10 

-148 

5-148774-49 

1 

t 

6-1517 

7-0414 

*  Possibly  not  BaD  (see  text). 

l)(oo)  =  28610-63,  being  2S642-63+  t,  as  given  for  S(oo)  in  [II.],  with  1/ro,  modified  by  £ 
as  explained  in  U'xt,  p.  358. 

VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  2    Y 


-32 


DR   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 


TABLE  II.  (continued). 


Ua. 


A,  =  92658.         S  =  1853'IG. 


Dn.               DI*            Dl3' 

0-C. 

4-065042  -306£     28,   -064116  +  10   28   -060410-46 
358 
5-081257  -598£  +  26   23,   -080331  +  115 
218, 
6-090986-1028^  +  22 

•00 
-•01 
•00 

-  -01 
-•05 

•05 

D(oo)  =  22760-19,  being  22760-09,  as  given  for  D(oo)  in  [II.],  modified  by  £  - 
The  numbers  are  calculated  from  the  problematic  data  given  in  [II.,  p.  65]. 


Zn. 


A,  =  7204*42.         A,  =  3486 '20.         S  =  154'93. 


D,,.                Di2-              DIO- 

0-C. 

o. 

0-C. 

0. 

0-C. 

0. 

2  -905892  (28)  -112^-20   158,  -905311  (49)  +  36   98,  -904963(100)  -  15 

•02 

•03 

-•03 

•05 

0 

•10 

3  -90751  9  (108)  -272^  +  6   138,  -907015  (108)  +  54  108,   -906627  (?)  +  43 

-  -00 

•03 

-  -01 

•03 

-  -01 

68, 
4  -908913  (404)  -539^-8 

•00 

•05 

46, 

5-909843(:>961)-940£-40 

•00 

•20 

•6  •  909593  (4068) 

•20 

•7-910072(11320) 

•30 

Collaterals  (see  text). 


D(<x)  =  42874-17  being  8 (OD)  =  42876-42  +  ^'j^,  as  given  in  [II.],  modified  by  £  =   -2'25. 

DU,  DIS  are  calculated  from  the  more  accurate  D.>I,  DJ-J  by  the  use  of  the  exact  value  of  >'i  =  388  •  905. 


DR.    \V.    M.   HICKS:    A    CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SI'KCTRAL   SERIES. 


347 


TABLE  II.  (continued). 


(M. 


A,  =  23105'56.          A.,  =  10368-54.         S  =  455'28. 


D,,.                  DM.              D,,. 

0-C. 

0. 

O-C. 

0. 

O-C. 

0. 

2-902039(28)  -111^-13   188,   -899990(44)  +  ?   US,  -898748(83)+  16 

•01 

•03 

-•01 

•05 

-•02 

•10 

756, 

3-910576(91)-  272£-  11   196,  -908413(630)-  22  1M,   -906706(t)  +  2 

•00 

•03 

•00 

•20 

0 

1 

315, 

4-914104(216)-541£-  19   196.  -911941  (70K)  +  31  156, 

•00 

•03 

•00 

•10 

128, 

5  -915470  (2656)  -942^-29 

•00 

•20 

118 

6  -920598  (6648)  -151  If  -60 

•00 

•30 

D(oo)  =  407 10 -85  being  S(  oo  )  =  40710'60  + 2.'ig  ,  as  given  in  [II.],  modified  by  (  -  -25 


Eu. 


=  51223.          Aa  =  18329.         S  =  833'04. 


Du.                                    D,,.                             D,8. 

O-C. 

2-930707  -114f          295,       -924667-25      335,      -917794  +  26 
57«, 
3-942578-279^-5 
205, 
4  -946742-552$  +17 
136, 
5-949450-960^  +  94 

0 
0 
0 
0 

•03 

-  -03 

D  (  oo )  -  40363  •  1 9  being  S  (  oo  )  in  [II.,  p.  73].     No  estimated  possible  errors  given. 

2  Y  2 


848  DR.    W.    M.    MICKS;    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SK1MKS. 


o> 


.1 

! 


CO 

o 
o 
o 
eo 


00 
OO 


0 

8 

10 

«—    e~ 

1 

S 

o 

0   O 
0   O 

o 

i 

1 

0 

•8 

o 

- 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

' 

6 

m 

O 

o 
m 

«—     c— 

o 

1 

iH 

O 

8 

8  S 

o 

1 

0 

« 

8 

S  - 

0 
1 

o 
o 

I-H 

O 

8  8 

o 

1 

IO 

00 

+ 

l~    1O 

+ 

0& 

1   + 

4 

r-H 

•*** 

CO    •—  I 

0 

CO 
Cl 

03 

-*     r-c 

<M    IM 

• 

—  - 

O3    O3 

(M 

•      • 

03 

p 

OS 

T-l 

_I_ 

00 


•Uji 

>. 
•8 

«B 
1 

e 

r-^ 


a 

I 

be 


o 

8 


s 


c 

J 


2 

o 

II 


.    W.    M.    HICKS;    A    CKITICAI,   S'lTMY    '  'I     SI'KCTUAI.    SKKIKS 


340 


TABU   II.  (continued). 

AL 
A  =  1754.         t  =  26-57. 


DII-                          DIJ. 

0-C. 

0. 

0  « 

0. 

2-631287(25)-83£  +  0      4*   -6311*1  (•_>">)+  12 

•00 

•OS 

-  -01 

•03 

117A 

:!  •  426069  (82)  -  1  83£  -  5     30*    •  425272  (82)  -  8 

•00 

•03 

•00 

•03 

Ma 

4  -261  194  (200)  -353£  +  20    528   -2598  12  (200)  +  2 

•00 

•03 

•00 

•03 

Ma 

5  -166498  (620)  -629^  -130 

•01 

•05 

<>•  115632(2088)  -  1044£+  160 

•00 

•10 

16A 

7-087568(3431)  -1626^  +  666 

-  -02 

•10 

7A 

8-0753  +  40O 

•2 

9-0604 

•2 

10-0523 

•2 

48164-12  being  S(  oo  )  =  48161  -46  ±2  -49,  as  given  bi  [II.],  modified  by  £  =  2 '66. 


In. 


A  =  37684. 


=  477-01. 


Du.                      D,,. 

0-C. 

0. 

0-C. 

0. 

2  si»3978(48)-102£+10      W     -821593  (48)  -  10 

-  -01 

•05 

•01 

•05 

37ft                       58rt 

3-806329  (167)  -251^  -76     28.^    -793927  (167)  -  154 

•02 

•05 

•04 

•05 

62<">                       62- 

4-  776755(31(2)  -497^  -20     26o    -764353(784)  -  287 

•00 

•05 

•03 

•10 

1  i                           50 

5  -755767  (2954)  -869^  -63     32^    -740503(7343)  -  98 

•00 

•20 

•00 

•50 

50ft 

f,  696300(4791)  -  1369^             *-716653-  179 

•20 

•0« 

•30 

7-                             *-71.V.-7 

•80 

8-                             *-717621 

•30 

9-                             '-717556 

•30 

10- 

•30 

11- 

1 

*  Collaterals  (2.5,)  D.,(m). 
D(w)  =  44454-76  ±2-48  being  S  ( <x  )  of  [II.] 


350 


DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIKS. 


TABLE  II.  (continued). 

Tl. 
A -134 154.         S=  1507-34. 


D,,.                   »»• 

0-C. 

0. 

O-C. 

0. 

2-897392      1            *•  888344 
»2-  899520  (80)  -111$+  10  /   248,     *•  890476  -16 

-  -01 

•03 

•02 

•03 

28,                       58i 
3  -898764  (89)  -270$  -30     278,     »•  888590  +  53 

•01 

•03 

-  -02 

•03 

28,                       38i 
4  -898010  (213)  -535$  -26     288,      -887459  +  53 

•00 

•03 

•00 

•03 

38,                       3'i 
5  -896880  (41  4)-  935$  +1     288,     -886329-116 

•00 

•03 

•01 

•03 

38,                       38i 
6  -895750  (2287)  -1495$  -220   288,      -885199  +  39 

•01 

•10 

•00 

•10 

38, 
7-894620  (3431)  -  2242$  -  1  197 
8  •  894620  (51  34)  -  3209$  +  301 
9-894620  (7067)  -  4417$  -  591 
10-8946  +  33 

•03 
•00 
•01 
-  -03 

•10 
•10 
•10 
•20 

11-8946  +  31 

-  -02 

•  -20 

12-8946  +  70 

-  -04 

•30 

13-8946  +  278 

-  -14 

•30 

14-89464406 

-  -16 

•30 

*  Collaterals  (see  text). 
D(o>)  =  41470-53±  1-72  being  S(o>)  of  [II]  modified  by  £  =  '3. 

O. 
A,  =  172.         A2  =  95.         $  =  9 


33. 


D'". 

O-C. 

0. 

D". 

O-C. 

0. 

2  -972467  (40)  -120$  +  16 
34A, 
3  -966621  (14)  -284$  -12 
14A, 
4-964213(18)-558$+15 

-  -12 
•015 
-  -008 

•3 
•018 
•01 

2  -980383  (93)  -121$  -3 
9A, 
3  -978835  (72)  -287$  +  7 
9A, 
4  -977287  (33)  -562$  +  28 

•03 
-  -026 
-  -017 

1-00 

•26 
•02 

5  -962837  (38)  -966$  +  20 
5\ 
6  -961977  (67)  -1538$  -15 
2A, 
7  -96  1633  (309)  -2301$  +  20 

-  -005 
•005 

-  -001 

•01 
•01 
•03 

5  -97677  1(68)1-974$  -33 

6  -976599  (21  5)  -1547$  +38 
7  -986756  (626)  -2321$ 
8  -985948  (6610)  -3305$ 

•010 
-  -007 

•02 

•04 
•07 
•5 

8-961285  (951)  -3281$  -63 
9  -965800(1)  -4521$ 

•003 

•06 

9-976599  (?)-  4523$+  1042 

-  -06 

J 

D'"(w)  =  23204-1. 
D'  (<x)  =  21204-2. 
The  observed  D"  corrected  to  give  v  =  -72,  treating  the  observed  line  as  the  mean  of  the  doublet. 


I»K.    W.    M.    HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY   OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 


.351 


TABLE  II.  (continued). 

S. 
A,  =  1044.         A,  =  651 7.         •*  =  37'28. 


0-C. 

0. 

4  -553453  (47)  -430^  +  7 
14A, 
5-544330(21)-776£-7 
6A, 
6  -5391  10  (38)  -1273£  -29 
3A, 
7;535978(194)-1944£  +  173 
2A, 
8  •  533890  (396)  -  2828£  -  202 
4A, 
9-529714  (1141)  -3936^-129 

-  -01 

0 
•007 
-  -02 
•02 
•01 

•05 
•01 
•01 
•03 
•04 
•08 

D(o>)  =  20084-2. 


Se. 

A,  =  6407.         Aa  =  2722.         S  =  226'8. 
Calculated  from  Observed  Values. 


4  -629262  (54)  -452^ 
5-621963(56)-810£ 
6  -615643  (105)  -1320^ 
7  -601  450  (240)  -2002^ 
8  -61  1058  (728)-  291  1£ 
9-  592507  (  643)  -4024| 
10-  57831  (270)  -540^ 

*•  626  1  33  (108) 
•622797 
•617055 
•608778 

D(<x)  =  19274. 


*  Calculated  from  I);.,  -  D..J. 


Modified  Table. 


0-C. 

0. 

0-C. 

O. 

4-629285  +  22    558,     -626167  +  11 

-  -02 

•06 

-  -01 

•09 

5-624976  +  41     38*,     -622822-56 

-  -02 

•03 

•03 

t 

198 

6-620667-5     558,    -617549-362 

•00 

•03 

•10 

1 

7-616358  +  156    558,    -613240-531 

-  -02 

•04 

•09 

•09 

198 

8-612049-700 

•076 

•08 

198 

9-607740  +  91 

-•00 

•05 

A.  +  A, 

10-59C60 

•15 

,,K.    U.    M.    HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY  OF  SPKITUAL  SERIES. 

Tin-  >••»/••///'.  S.ri,--iiinM.— As  the  values  of  the  satellite  differences  are  practically 
Jndewodanl  <-!'  ih.-  exact  value  of  D(«),  their  consideration  may  be  taken  up  at 
,„„,.  ..,,„!  th--  details  of  the  calculations  respecting  the  tables  postponed  until  the 
consideration  of  the  older  differences.  An  examination  of  the  tables  will  show 
,,,,,,.hisiv,-ly  that  these  differences  are  multiples  of  the  "oun."  Dealing  first  with 
tli,-  differences  for  the  first  lines,  the  following  figures,  contained  implicitly  in  th.- 
tables,  will  show  how  closely  this  is  the  case.  The  nearest  multiples  of  the  oun  are 
appended,  as  calculated  from  the  first  approximations  of  Table  I.  The  possible  errors 
are  those  of  the  D,,  lines  (except  Zn). 


Cs. 

Cu 

&g 

Ca. 

Sr. 
Ba. 

Zn. 


7394  ±228       46*,  =  7340 

7  94  ±43         22*,  =  804 
2424  ±19         23*,  =  2422 

f   746±8  51*,  =  741 

'1   450±25         31*,  =  451 

j"3620±7  52*,  =  3596 

•\2170±?  31*,  =  2154 

.  .     Not  observed,  as  deduced 

below  (p.  388),  15*,  9*, 

or  60*,,  36*, 

T   525±77         IS*,  =  581 
'  'I    369 ±28  9*,  =  350 


Cd  . 

f2029±28 
'1_1234±44 

18*. 

=  2049 
=  1248 

Eu  . 

J6065±? 
'  '  L6822±? 

29*, 
33*, 

=  6040 
=  6873 

Hg  - 

r3980±25 
.  A  6909  +  38 
L  346±38 

11*, 
19*, 

=  3991 
=  6894 

=  363 

Al.  . 

.  .    94±35 

14*i 

=  93 

In  .  . 

'.  .  2405  ±48 

20*! 

=  2385 

Tl.  . 

.  .  9048  ±27 

24*, 

=  9044 

Se. 

3129±54 

55*, 

=  3118 

The  only  case  of  "  failure "  is  the  first  difference  for  Sr  in  which  the  estimated 
possible  error  is  extremely  small.  If  the  possible  error  be  the  sum  of  those  of  each 
line,  the  value  is  15  in  place  of  7,  and  if  *,  be  calculated  from  the  most  probable 
value  of  the  oun  it  should  be  about  ¥iD  greater,  i.e.,  52*,  =  3600.  It  will  be  noted 
that  where  triplets  enter,  the  two  satellite  differences,  and  consequently  the  two 
satellite  separations,  are  extremely  close  to  the  ratio  5  :  3.  This  ratio  seems  to 
persist  also  in  Hg  where  the  separations  are  in  reverse  ordtir,  and  we  find  a  ratio  of 
3  :  5  in  place  of  5:3.  The  law  for  this  ratio  is  in  fact  much  more  closely  obeyed 
than  the  corresponding  one  for  the  ratio  2:1  for  the  triplet  separations.  It  is 
therefore  of  great  assistance  in  searching  for  the  lines  of  F  series  whose  limits  are 
VI )  ('!},  and  which  consequently  possess  constant  triplet  separations  in  this  ratio.  Its 
explanation  should  be  expected  to  throw  some  valuable  light  011  the  constitution  of 
tin-  atom.  The  general  dependence  of  the  differences  on  the  small  "oun"  J,  should 
also  be  noted. 

Passing  now  to  the  consideration  of  the  satellite  differences  for  orders  beyond  the 
first  (m>'J),  it  is  seen  that  they  still  depend  on  multiples  of  the  oun,  but  different 
from  those  of  the  first  order.  In  a  large  number  of  cases  the  multiples  are  the  same 


DR.  W.   M.   HICKS;    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPFXTTRAL  SERIES.  353 

for  different  orders  within  limits  of  errors,  especially  in  the  doublets  and  differences 
'•I'  tin-  second  and  third  satellites.  Thus  we  find  Cs,  14<J;  Ca,  13<J,  83;  Sr,  12&  for 
m  =  3  and  15<5  for  m>3  for  first  separations,  and  8&  for  all  orders  in  the  second  ;  Ba 
and  Zn  show  too  few  for  comparison  (see  discussion  below);  Cd,  19<J,,  15^,  ;  Hg  is 
ii  regular,  Al  is  anomalous  ;  In  26$,  Tl,  27 <Ji  for  m  =  2,  and  28 J,  for  m>3  ;  Se,  as 
amended  later,  shows  55(5,  for  m  =  4,  6,  7,  and  38(J,  for  m  =  5,  the  lines  for  m<3 
Ix-iiig  outside  region  of  observation.  The  evidence  points  to  a  normal  rule  that  the 
differences  for  the  orders  beyond  the  first  in  any  spectrum  are  the  same,  but  different 
from — in  general  greater  than — that  of  the  first. 

The  Order  Differences. — The  order  differences  change  very  considerably  with  a 
change  in  the  value  taken  for  the  limit,  i.e.,  in  the  value  given  to  £  No  doubt  with 
unlimited  choice  of  £  it  would  be  possible  to  arrange  a  set  of  denominator  differences 
all  multiples  of  the  oun  within  error  limits,  for  a  series  of  values  of  £  could  be  found 
making  the  first  difference  a  multiple.  Out  of  these  one  or  two  would  probably  give 
the  second  such  a  multiple.  After  the  second  the  error  limits  as  a  rule  come  to  be 
very  large,  in  fact  larger  than  half  the  oun  itself,  except  in  case  of  very  high  atomic 
weight.  No  conclusions  could  be  drawn  from  any  such  arrangement.  But  in  the 
present  cases  the  choice  of  £  is  bounded  by  very  narrow  limits,  for  the  relation 
D(oo)  =  S(oo)  is  supposed  to  hold,  and,  as  a  rule,  the  values  of  S(»)  are  known 
with  very  considerable  accuracy,  and  the  possible  limits  of  variation  are  known. 
They  were  given  in  [I.]  and  [II.].  Before  proceeding  to  draw  general  conclusions 
from  Table  II.,  it  will  be  well  to  consider  in  more  detail  the  data  for  the  different 
elements  on  which  the  table  is  based. 

Na. 

Although  the  readings  for  NaD  are  very  inexact,  the  peculiarity  of  the  large 
depression  shown  for  m  =  6,  as  well  as  the  large  recovery  afterwards  to  raantissse 
close  to  unity,  must  be  real  effects.  It  is  of  course  possible  that  NaD,  (6)  is  a 
collateral  from  the  normal  type.  If  D,  (6)  be  calculated  from  D.,(6)— v,  the  mantissa 
becomes  '989054,  in  other  words,  the  D2  line  begins  to  show  the  rise  to  the  large 
final  value  at  m  =  6,  whilst  D,  does  not  do  so  until  m  =  7.  The  D,  lines  would  seem 
to  succumb  to  the  disturbing  effects  sooner  than  the  D,.  It  was  pointed  out  in 
[I.,  p.  83]  that  in  the  Na  the  D  series  apparently  belongs  to  the  F  type,  in  which 
the  mantissa  is  '998613.  It  would  almost  seem  that  the  peculiar  rise  shown  is  due 
to  the  fact  that  it  reverts  to  this  F  sequence.  Here,  as  we  shall  see  in  other  cases, 
the  values  of  the  first  members  of  these  series  appear  to  be  subject  to  some  kind  of 
displacement  which  affects  their  (supposedly)  normal  relations  to  other  lines.  If  now 
tin-  first  mantissa  be  supposed  normally  to  be  this  998G13,  it  is  9691  above  that  in 
tin'  modified  table,  and  this  is  13A  +  32,  thus  completing  the  order  differences  as 
multiples  of  A.  But  in  any  case  the  data  for  Na  are  of  small  use  for  the  present 
purpose,  as  the  errors  are  so  large,  and  A  so  small.  The  arrangement  in  the  table 

VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  2    Z 


,„;.    w.    M.    HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

•  riven  the  values  of  O-C  least.     If  (  be  taken  about  '6,  the  order  differences  can  run 
3A  .  4A,  4A  within  error  limits. 

K. 

It  is  seen  that  the  numbers,  with  the  exception  as  in  other  cases  of  the  first 
difference,  fall  into  multiples  of  A  quite  naturally  without  a  change  in  D  ( »),  though 
possibly  a'  small  change  in  £  might  make  the  values  of  O-C  less.  A  is  so  large,  that 
the  theory  of  the  dependence  on  multiples  receives  considerable  support.  The  first 
also  is  close  to  20A.  This  element  is  one  in  which  the  value  given  in  the  first 
discussion  above  for  the  oun  is  862'68tc»,  which  is  presumably  too  large  by  '8  to  "9. 
If  it  be  361'8,  A  should  be  ¥b  less  and  =  2933.  This  would  scarcely  effect  the  other 
intervals,  but  it  would  make  the  first  one  =  20A-704.  Again  there  is  a  sudden  fall 
(at  m  =  8),  It  doubtless  corresponds  to  a  real  effect,  for  SAWDERS  as  well  as 
LIVEINO  and  DEWAR  make  »  anomalous  here.  S.  observes  *  =  61'25  and  L.D.  59'15, 
hut  both  give  D,(8)  the  same.  If  this  be  taken  as  correct  and  the  normal  Dt(8) 
found  from  D-,-57'87,  the  mantissa  is  733756,  giving  the  same  difference  2A.  This 
shows  that  the  Da  set  have  not  participated  in  the  sudden  fall — at  least  to  the  same 
degree  as  D, — a  result  analogous  to  what  happens  in  Na. 

Eb. 

In  Rb  there  is  some  doubt  whether  a  satellite  series  exists.     The  question  has 
already  been  discussed  in  [I.,  pp.  71,  86].     SAUNDERS  has  given  for  D  (3)  lines  whose 
wave  numbers  are  12883'93,  12886'56,  and  13121'19,  with  normal  separations  237'26, 
and  satellite  separations  2 '6 3.     Also  D  (4)  is  a  doublet  having  a  separation  23 5 '52, 
which  certainly  points  to  an  unobserved  satellite  about  2'4±'l.     But  RANDALL'S 
observations  for  D  (2)  show  only  a  doublet  of  normal  separation — that  is  clearly  with 
no  satellite.     Moreover  the  F  series,  which    depends  on  Dn  (2)  and  DJ2  (2)  for  its 
limits,  is  a  singlet  series  and  not  a  double  one.     In  the  table  the  series  is  taken  as  if 
it  were  without  a  satellite,  the  reading  for  Dt  (4)  being  corrected  from  D2  (4)— v.     In 
other  words  it  represents  the  satellite  lines  if  they  actually  do  exist.     In  the  latter 
case  the  strong  lines  would  show  denominators  about  609,  and  1100  above  those  in 
the  table  for  Du  (3)  and  Dn  (4).     The  first  is  about  28  and  the  second  of  the  order  of 
4cJ,  whilst  if  normal,  judging  from  other  cases,  they  should  be  equal.     Moreover,  in 
all  other  cases  (In  and  Tl  excepted)  the  satellite  separations  are  practically  the  same 
multiples  of  the  oun  in  the  same  group.     Cs  shows  a  difference  of  14^,  so  that  the 
supposed  ones  here  are  far  too  small,  as  well  as  irregular.     The  observed  separations, 
moreover,  are  equal  within  errors  of  observation,  which  would  rather  point  to  an 
alteration  in  D,  ( t» ).     Now  a  lateral  displacement  of  2S  on  D  ( o> )  would  produce  a 
separation  of  2 '41,  which  is  about  the  observed  value. 

The  table  shows  a  stationary  point  at  m  =  8  and  9  and  then  the  large  fall  shown 
in  the  other  elements.     They  could   be   accounted   for   by  a   lateral   displacement 


DR.  W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  355 

(2<T,)P(<»),  the  mantissa  of  m  =  8  being  at  the  same  time  subject  to  the  fall  of 
multiples  of  S  which  would  scarcely  stop  at  14<J.  In  the  table,  however,  the  errors 
are  inserted  on  the  supposition  that  the  mantissa?  remain  constant. 

Cs. 

The  mantissre  appear  to  run  down  by  equal  intervals  from  m  =  4  to  6,  are  equal  for 
6,  7,  8,  then  a  large  drop  of  alxmt  US  to  the  same  value  for  9,  10,  and  return  to  the 
value  at  m  =  8  for  m  =  11.  The  possible  errors  are  so  large  that  the  regularity  is 
curious.  It  is  possible  that  they  might  run  down  at  equal  intervals  of  3(5,  to  the  last 
one  for  m  =  10.  Or,  if  there  are  very  small  observational  errors,  the  drop  for  9,  10 
may  be  due  to  a  lateral  displacement,  about  (  +  7<J,)  D  ( oo).  It  should  l)e  noticed  that 
with  Cs  all  the  order  differences  but  one  are  multiples  of  3*,,  or  the  group  multiple. 

Cu. 

The  two  first  doublets  of  CuD  are  strong.  The  third  is  much  weaker  than  would 
be  expected.  Moreover,  it  gives  a  separation  between  Dn  and  D21  of  252*14,  whereas 
it  should  be  somewhat  less  than  v  =  248'28.  This  (X  =  3688 '6)  can  therefore  scarcely 
be  the  normal  chief  line  of  this  doublet.  Now  EDER  and  VALENTA  give  a  spark  line 
at  368775  which  gives  a  separation  with  D2,  of  245'91,  leaving  a  satellite  separation 
of  2 '37,  which  is  within  limits  in  fair  order  with  the  corresponding  separations  in  the 
two  previous  doublets,  viz.,  6'60  and  3'39.  Moreover,  the  satellite  separation  of  2'37 
gives  a  satellite  difference  of  1317  and  9S  =  1315,  so  that  the  normal  satellite 
differences  would  run  22e?,,  27<5,,  36<$,.  This,  then,  would  seem  to  be  the  wanting 
normal  chief  line,  and  it  is  then  interesting  to  note  that  the  line  usually  accepted  as 
Du  (4)  is  a  collateral  of  this.  The  denominator  difference  of  the  two  is  2474  and 
17*  =  2484  (S  =  146).  Hence  the  K.R  line  3688  is  the  collateral  D,,(4)(-17J),  and 
apparently  the  small  intensity  is  due  to  the  usual  decrease  produced  by  a  negative 
lateral  displacement.  The  modified  table  is  taken  on  £  =  —  '08.  It  is  remarkable 
how  close  the  observed  differences  come  to  multiples,  but  little  reliance  must  be 
placed  on  deductions  from  them  both  on  account  of  the  large  possible  errors  and  the 
smallness  of  <V 

Ag.      '       /•• 

Unfortunately  the  D  series  in  Silver  is  poorly  developed — only  the  first  satellite 
has  been  observed,  and  the  three  chief  lines  after  the  first  have  very  large  possible 
observation  errors.  Nothing,  therefore,  can  be  learnt  as  to  the  march  of  the  satellite 
differences  beyond  the  fact  that  the  observed — 2436 — is  very  close  to  23<S,  =  2421. 
In  the  modified  table  £  =  '1,  the  differences  are  very  close  as  is  seen  to  multiples  of 
J,,  but  there  can  be  no  certainty  with  such  large  possible  errors. 

2  Z  2 


356  DR-  W.   M.  HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 


In  the  D  series  of  Magnesium,  as  arranged  by  KAYSER  and  RUNGE  and  as  generally 
accepted,  there  are  clearly  certain  abnormalities.  D!  (4)  is  more  intense  than  we 
should  expect,  and  its  separation  from  D.j(4)  is  45'39  in  place  of  40'92,  whilst  that  of 
Da(4)  and  D3(4)  is  very  close  to  the  exact  value.  This  cannot  be  due  to  observational 
error,  for  this  is  very  small  ('03).  Either,  therefore,  the  true  line  is  hidden  by  this 
bright  one,  which  can  scarcely  be  the  case,  or  it  is  a  collateral.  In  the  former  case 
the  true  line  ought  to  be  that  found  by  deducting  vl  and  v1  +  va  from  the  satellites. 
In  the  second  case  it  would  require  the  addition  of  19^  to  the  denominator  of  D  (  o°), 
and  the  addition  would  explain  the  increased  intensity.  The  two  results  agree,  the 
wave  numbers  resulting  being  respectively  35054'80  and  '71.  The  former  would  give 
a  denominator  '832041  in  place  of  that  in  the  table,  but  its  observational  error  would 
be  that  of  D3,  viz.,  945,  while  that  of  the  collateral  depends  on  the  observed  Dls  and 
is  190.  D(5)  gives  normal  separations  within  limits.  D  (6)  gives  v  =  46  '87  and 
22*15,  but  normal  within  the  observation  errors  (2'8)  [see  Note  1  at  end]. 

But  there  is  another  question  which  arises  in  connection  with  Mg.  In  the  Ca 
sub-group  the  first  lines  have  a  denominator  about  1'9,  i.e.,  with  m  =  1.  In  the  Zn 
sub-group  the  lowest  value  of  m  is  2.  In  the  MgD  series,  as  generally  accepted,  the 
first  line  is  X  =  3838,  which  requires  m  =  2.  If  there  is  a  line  corresponding  to 
m  =  1  it  should  be  in  the  neighbourhood  of  14900.  Now  PASCHEN  has  observed  a 
strong  line  at  X  =  14877'!,  but  there  is  no  triplet,  which  would  be  decisive  against 
the  allocation  if  we  could  be  certain  all  the  lines  must  exist.  But  there  are  cases 
where  normal  lines  are  observed  weaker  than  we  should  expect,  or  are  not  seen  at  all. 
The  well-known  case  of  KD(3)  is  one  example,  and  it  is  curious  that  if  14877  be 
taken  as  MgD(l)  the  denominator  comes  out  as  given  in  the  table  in  a  very  natural 
order  with  the  other  denominators.  The  question  is  considered  later  under  the  F 
series,  and  the  evidence  there  adduced  is  rather  against  the  present  suggestion 
(p.  398). 

Ca. 

The  value  of  S  is  calculated  from  A2  as  58  '14,  A^A;,  would  give  58'  18,  practically 

the  same.     To  bring  the  differences  of  the  first  three  denominators  to  multiples  of  S 

it  is  necessary  to  diminish  the  limit  given  from  the  consideration  of  the  S  series  by 

1'6  (variation  limits  given  in  [II.]  =  5'8).     The  values  can  then  be  arranged  as  in  the 

table.     One  result  of  this  is  to  increase  the  value  of  At  (for  the  given  Vl  =  105'89)  to 

from  2791,  which  gives  S  =  361'30^  in  place  of  361'17,  and  thus  closer  to  the 

adopted  value  361  '80.     A  noticeable  peculiarity  in  this  series  is  the  very  rapid  falling 

the  denominators  after  m  =--  4.     It  is  so  large  and  at  the  same  time  so 

that  they  cannot  be  brought  into  line  with  the  others  without  diminishing 

the  limit  by  a  large  amount  and  by  different  amounts.    It  clearly  points  to  the  existence 


DR.   VV.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  357 

of  collaterals,  formed  by  the  addition  of  ouns  to  the  limit  D(oo).  As  such  increase 
tends  to  increase  intensity  it  may  account  for  these  surviving  when  the  typical  ones 
are  either  too  faint  or  are  destroyed  to  form  the  collaterals.  It  is  useless  to  attempt 
to  determine  these  multiples,  because  the  observation  errors  are  so  large  themselves 
as  to  be  a  large  multiple  of  the  oun,  and  at  the  same  time  we  have  no  knowledge  <>!' 
what  the  typical  VI)  (m)  should  be.  In  general  in  the  2nd  group  the  successive 
denominators  are  formed  by  the  successive  addition  of  smaller  and  smaller  multiples 
of  the  oun  until  probably  a  constant  value  is  reached.  In  the  present  case,  with  the 
quantity  155(5,  that  limit  is  certainly  not  reached.  But  it  may  be  instructive,  in 
order  to  illustrate  the  nature  of  the  suggestion,  to  find  what  the  collaterals  ought  to 
be  if  the  denominators  of  VD(»t)  remain  the  same  for  TO  >  4,  viz.,  "091707.  The 
multiples  are  found  to  be  7S,  15<S,  33d  The  series  of  the  observed  D,,  lines  may  then 
be  exhibited  by  the  following  scheme,  where  d  stands  for  '091707  :— 

D  (  oo)-VD  (2+d-99A8-155<J), 


D(oo)-VD(4+d), 


The  line  D12(2)  is  interesting.  PASCHEN  gave  it  as  19859'9  with  the  remark 
"  Wahrscheinlich  doppelt  1<)856'9,  19864'6,"  and  he  allotted  19864'6  to  D13  and 
19856  '9  to  the  Principal  series.  But  in  [II.,  p.  56]  reasons  were  given  against  the 
latter  allocation.  In  fact  the  line  is  very  close  (probably  within  observation  errors) 
to  the  collateral  formed  by  adding  one  oun  to  D12.  The  wave-length  of  such  would 
be  19857'S  =  D,.,  (2)  (  +  S)  [see  Note  2  at  end]. 

Sr. 

The  value  of  S  is  calculated  as  277  '8  9  from  A,  +  Aa=125x4,  which  gives 
$  =  361'64?^.  The  differences  as  shown  in  the  table  are  extremely  close  to  multiples 
of  S.  Moreover,  the  limits  of  variation  for  the  first  two  are  so  small  that  the 
variations  of  ROWLAND'S  standards  from  the  correct  values  for  his  scale  may  become 
of  importance.  For  D(3)  the  values  should  be  2  less,  whilst  for  D(2),  failing  direct 
observations  for  reduction  to  vacuo,  recourse  must  be  had  to  extrapolation  on 
KAYSER  and  RUNGE'S  formula,*  which  has  been  done.  In  order  to  bring  the 
differences  for  Du(3)  and  Da(4)  and  of  Du(4)  and  Du(4)  to  multiples  of  S  within 
error  limits,  it  is  necessary  to  take  £  about  —  '4  or  D(oo)  =  31027  '25.  When  this  is 
done  the  denominators  can  be  arranged  as  in  the  table.  The  difference  of  the  two 

*  RANDALL  appears  to  have  done  this  for  Dn  but  not  for  DU,  which  also  makes  his  value  of  v\  »=  392  •  6 
instead  of  394-42,  which  is  close  to  the  true  value. 


358  1>R-  W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

first  denominators  =  181557  =  653x278'03.  It  is  possible  the  real  errors  attached 
to  D  (2)  by  RANDALL  may  be  greater  and  the  difference  slightly  less  ;  but  if  we 
suppose  278-03  to  be  the  real  value  of  S  it  makes  $  =  361'82t^,  and,  therefore,  very 
close  to  the  adopted  value.  It  would  appear  that  D12(4)  has  been  displaced  from  its 
normal  value,  judging  from  the  irregularity  introduced  into  the  separations.  If  so 
the  separations  might  be  14<5  in  place  of  15S. 

Ba. 

Starting  with  the  uncertain  value  of  S(<»)  =  28642'63,  as  given  in  [II.],  the  value 
of  S  as  calculated  from  A,  +  A3  is  68270,  and  from  Aa  is  684'34,  both  being  near  the 
most  probable  values  but  on  opposite  sides.  The  value  683  is  taken  at  first  as  a  rough 
approximation.  Apparently,  the  first  set  of  lines  have  not  been  observed.  RANDALL* 
has  observed  two  lines,  29223'4,  23254'8,  which  give  a  separation  878'27,  which  is  vlt 
but  no  signs  of  satellites — or,  rather,  if  there  are  satellites,  the  separation  observed 
should  be  much  smaller.  If,  however,  the  satellites  have  gone  here,  and  this  pair 
denote  the  first  two  lines  of  the  first  triplet,  they  depend  on  VD13,  and  the  value  of 
the  denominator  is  2'085331,t  which  would  range  well  with  those  of  Ca  and  Sr,  viz., 
1'946,  1'987,  but  the  second  lines  of  these  give  3'082,  3'169,  and  of  Ba  3'093,  which 
would  rather  point  to  a  less  value  than  2'085  for  the  first  line.  But  if  VD  (2)  is 
larger  than  D(oo),  the  lines  would  be  -23254'8  for  the  first  and  -29223'4  for  the 
second,  giving  a  denominator  for  the  first  of  1 '825551.  The  differences  of  the 
denominators  of  the  D13  lines  for  m  =  2,  3,  4,  will  then  be  267632,  38612  instead  of 
6528,  38612,  and  are  therefore  more  in  agreement  with  the  type  of  the  other  elements 
of  this  group.  Moreover,  the  former,  as  we  shall  see,  is  a  multiple  of  S,  whilst  the 
other  (6528)  is  as  far  out  as  it  can  be.  Both  values,  however,  are  inserted  in  the 
tables  (see  also  p.  389). 

The  satellite  differences  for  D  (3)  are  9492±32  and  7516±40.  The  values  of  US 
and  US  are  respectively  9562±5  and  7513±4,  and  hence  the  first  cannot  be  14<S  within 
limits  of  error,  although  it  is  so  close  as  to  produce  a  conviction  that  it  really  is  so. 
Now  for  small  variations  of  the  limit  D  ( oo )  the  separation  differences  are  scarcely 
affected,  but,  as  we  saw  in  [II.],  there  was  evidence  to  show  that  the  limit  S  ( oo )  was 
considerably  less  than  that  found,  and,  in  that  case,  the  separation  differences  would 
be  slightly  changed.  A  decrease  of  D  ( oo )  would  increase  those  differences.  If, 
however,  it  is  so  large  as  to  bring  up  the  first  to  14<$,  the  second  is  increased  so  much 
that  it  is  not  IIS  within  limits.  Consequently,  the  two  conditions  confine  the  choice 
of  D(oo)  within  very  narrow  limits.  It  is  found  to  be  close  to  a  decrease  of  32, 
i.e.t  D(»)  =  28610'63.  This  again  changes  the  values  of  A1}  A2,  with  the  given 
values  of  Vl  and  v,  to  29379  and  11997,  giving  from  A,,  S  =  683'2.  The  table  is 

*  'Ann.  der  Phys.,'  33  (1910),  p.  745. 

t  The  values  in  this  and  in  the  table  are  calculated  from  the  limit  as  modified  below. 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  359 

drawn  up  on  this  basis.     With  these  data,  the  suggested  allocations  for  D,  (2)  give 
I  IK-  following  differences  between  tli.-ir  denominators  and  that  of  D13(3),  viz.  : — 

With  D,3(2)  =  29223  6528  =  9'5  x  683 

Dlg(2)  =  -23254          267632  =  392  x  683. 

The  first,  therefore,  cannot  be  a  multiple  within  error  limits. 

The  values  shown  for  D  (4)  agree  very  well,  but  the  regularity  is  upset.  Also  the 
actual  lines  have  changed  in  appearance,  and  their  intensities  are  not  normal.  The 
intensities  for  D!  (3)  are  10,  6,  4,  those  for  D,  (4)  4,  4,  6.  We  should  expect  Dn  (4)  to 
be  stronger,  and  certainly  D,:,(4)  to  l)e  much  weaker.  It  would  seem  that  collaterals 
must  displace  the  normal  lines.  We  have,  in  the  foregoing  pages,  been  led  to  expect 
that  an  addition  of  an  oun  increases  the  intensity  and  a  deduction  diminishes  it.  If 
so,  we  should  expect  a  deduction  in  Dn  and  an  addition  in  D13.  To  bring  Du  14<5 
above  D13  requires  the  deduction  to  be  made  in  VD.  This  would  make  the  typical 
value  of  the  denominator  greater  by  2733,  viz.,  4'161071.  In  the  case  of  D13,  to 
bring  it  closer  to  D,a,  i.e.,  distant  US,  the  addition  would  have  to  be  to  D(oo),  and 
if  so,  the  value  of  29<5,  given  in  the  modified  table,  would  have  been  a  mere  coincidence. 
But  no  such  addition  of  a  multiple  of  S  (nor  of  <Jj)  will  do  this.  If,  however,  2S  be 
added  to  the  denominator  in  D  (  »),  it  is  brought  to  separation  of  10<5+36,  giving  an 
error  in  X  for  D13(4)  of  —'02  in  place  of  —'06.  If,  then,  S  be  also  deducted  from  VD, 
the  separations  will  be  11(5.  The  separations  would  then  take  the  form 

423(5 

US          US 
66S 

US          US. 

This  arrangement  is  to  be  preferred  in  that  (l)  it  explains  the  abnormal  intensities 
of  D  (4),  (2)  brings  the  separations  into  line  with  other  elements.  The  arrangement 
suggested  may  be  stated  thus:  if  Du(4)  and  DI3(4)  represent  the  typical  lines,  the 
observed  Dn  is  Du(4)  (  — 2<5)  with  decreased  intensity,  and  D,3  is  (  +  2S)  D,3(4)  (— S), 
the  increased  intensity  due  to  the  +  2S  in  D  (  oo )  being  greater  than  the  decrease  due 
to  -S  in  VD. 

The  results  for  orders  >  4  are  similar  to  those  of  the  other  elements  of  their  groups, 
probably  collaterals  of  additions  to  D  ( <» ). 

Zn. 

On  account  of  the  small  values  of  <$„  and  the  considerable  observation  errors,  the 
satellite  separations  in  Zinc  do  not  give  decisive  resulta  If  we  take  the  observed 
values  for  the  D12  and  D13  sets,  the  denominator  differences  are  489,  419  for  m  =  2, 
.•mil  584,  399  for  m  =  3.  Now  the  second  sets,  the  D.,,  have  much  smaller  observation 


:;,;.•  DR.  W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CKITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SElilKS. 

errors  than  the  satellites  of  the  first — see  remark  in  the  table.  If  the  latter  be 
calculated  from  them,  using  the  accurate  value  of  »l  =  388 '90,  the  differences  come 
out  to  be  525,  369  and  456,  399,  quite  reversing  the  order  of  magnitude  for  the  first 
satellite  of  the  lines  for  m  =  2,  3,  and,  moreover,  their  differences  are  larger  than  S}. 
The  differences  best  consonant  with  the  measures — using  the  derived  values  from  Da- 
are  13<5,  =  503  and  IOS1  =  388,  giving  a  ratio  of  1'30.  Those  entered  in  the  table, 
however,  are  15^  =  581,  9(5,  =  348,  both  within  the  limits  of  observation,  and  adopted 
because  they  give  a  ratio  5  :  3,  the  same  as  the  other  elements  of  Group  2.  The 
satellite  separations  for  m  =  3  may  be  the  same  as  the  latter  within  limits,  but  not 
necessarily  so. 

The  order  differences  do  not  work  in  well  with  the  above  when  £  =  0.  If,  however, 
£  be  put  =  —2 '2  5,  they  fall  into  line  with  extreme  accuracy,  as  shown  in  the  table. 
It  is  of  interest  to  notice  that  the  differences  are  multiples  of  Sv  =  6^,  which  seems  to 
be  specially  associated  with  zinc. 

The  denominators  for  m  =  6,  7  are  now  G'915855  (4068)  and  7'924179  (11320), 
showing  too  large  a  rise  to  be  due  to  error  observations.  Treated  as  collaterals 
with  -2J,  and  -3^  they  become  6'909593,  7'910070,  clearly  near  the  probable 
limit. 

Judging  from  analogy,  we  should  not  expect  the  differences  to  stop  at  4^6.  The 
series  (7,  6,  4)  <S6  would  probably  be  continued,  but  the  errors  are  too  large  to  settle 
the  question.  If  the  series  were  continued,  e.g.,  by  2Se,  0,  the  denominators  would  be 
6-910288-G95  and  7'910288-218.  But  the  best  agreement  is  to  take  them  as  they 
are.  This  would  also  be  in  analogy  with  Ca,  in  which  D  (  oo )  begins  to  change  when 
VD  stops  changing. 

Cd. 

In  the  table  £  is  taken  '25  above  S(o>),  as  given  in  [II.].  It  is  seen  that  the 
arrangement  fits  in  with  great  accuracy,  and  as  ^  is  as  large  as  114,  the  arrangement 
may  be  considered  to  have  some  weight.  The  denominators  calculated  from  the 
D,  and  D3  lines  (more  accurately  determined)  do  not  agree  with  the  observed  Dt 
satellites.  It  would  therefore  appear  that  the  second  and  third  members  of  the 
triplets  may  also  be  subject  to  special  displacements.  Here,  for  instance,  the  lines  of 
order  3  are  brought  into  line  if  the  observed  VD21  (3)  is  VD12  (3)  (-5,).  The  value  of 
D,,(4),  calculated  from  K.R.'s  D31(4),  cannot  be  the  normal  one,  even  when  his 
extreme  possible  error  is  allowed.  This  shows  again  that  VD31  (4)  must  be  displaced 
from  VD13(4),  in  this  case  by  lOc?,. 

^  The  denominator  for  m  =  6  shows  the  sudden  large  rise  after  a  slow  change  which 

Zu  also  exhibits,  but  it  cannot  be  explained,  as  in  that  case,  by  treating  it  as  a 

llateral  due  to  a  modification  of  D  ( oo)  alone.     The  closest  collateral  of  this  type 

due  to  J,  and  this  changes  D  (oo)  by  5'66  producing  in  the  denominator 

a  change  too  far  in  the  opposite  direction.     In  fact  it  becomes  6'912000,  3471  below 


DR   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

th.it  of  m  —  5  in  place  of  50(50  above.  But  the  observation  error  in  this  line  is  so 
l.-ir^i-  thai  us  it  stands  it  may  correspond  really  to  a  denominator  equal  to  that  of 
/"  -  ^.  If  further  the  series  of  differences  75<?,,  31»f,,  12<?,,  be  continued  diminishing 
further  as  l<x>ks  probable,  it  would  come  more  nearly  in  line.  For  instance,  as  each 
term  is  about  '4  the  previous,  suppose  the  next  is  5<J,  =  569.  The  value  of  D,  (6)  as 
thus  calculated  differs  from  the  observed  by  —'19  while  the  possible  error  is  '30. 
This  would  make  the  constancy  of  the  denominator  begin  at  an  order  one  higher  than 
in  Xi i.  The  case  of  Hg  will  be  seen  to  support  this  tendency. 

There  are  two  sets  of  doublets,  364974,  3500'09,  and  3005*53,  2903*24  with 
separations  1171*13  and  1171*95  which  are  clearly  associated  with  the  D  series. 
If  we  write  down  the  observed  satellite  separations  in  the  D,(2)  and  the  D, (3) 
lines  find  of  D,3  with  the  above  we  get  the  following  scheme:  18*23,  11*10, 
267*13  and  7*98,  6*18,  262*40.  At  first  sight  it  makes  the  new  lines  appear  as 
collaterals  by  the  change  of  about  £A,  on  D(oo),  but  this  cannot  be  the  case,  because 
a  change  of  this  amount  would  very  considerably  diminish  the  doublet  separations 
below  1171.  If  the  D1:l— D13  separation  be  deducted  from  that  of  the  lines  in  question 
there  results  267*1 3  — 11*10  =  256*03  and  262*40-6*18  =  256*22.  Now  the  separations 
ll'lO,  6*18  depend,  as  is  seen  above,  on  11<J,,  15<J,,  so  that  the  new  lines  may  be 
written  *P(oo)_VDI3(2)(-llJI)-A,  D  ( oo)_VD13(3)(-15<J,)-A,  where  A  is  a 
constant  which  on  more  accurate  calculation  is  found  to  be  255*80  ±'2.  In  other 
words,  the  VD  of  the  new  lines  is  derived  from  VI)1:,  in  the  same  way  as  that  is  from 
VI), a.  This  formula  is  of  a  type  of  which  there  has  been  no  example  hitherto.  If  it 
remained  there  the  evidence,  in  spite  of  the  curious  connection  with  the  other 
satellites,  would  scarcely  be  weighty  enough  to  cause  the  introduction  of  a  new 
departure.  I  hope  however  to  show  in  a  future  communication  that  this  expresses  a 
very  common  relation  between  sets  of  lines,  the  constant  A  being  in  reality  a  com- 
posite one.  The  question  naturally  arises  do  the  new  terms  give  rise  to  an  F  series 
in  the  same  way  as  the  ordinary  D  ?  It  should  be  at  a  distance  about  2(57*13  in  wave 
number  above  that  of  F.  The  line  15713*3  (u  =  6362*25)  is  266*90  above  that  of  the 
line  16401*5  (n  =  6095*35)  which  is  allotted  by  PASCHKN  to  F3(3)  and  is  clearly  the 
first  of  the  lines  in  question.  There  is  an  F(4)  line  at  11630'8  (n  =  8595*57)  and 
another  at  1 1268*4  (n  =  8872*01)  is  266*44  above  this.  This  may  lie  the  corresponding 
line  sought  for,  but  if  so  the  line  11630  must  be  F3(4)  and  the  lines  F,  (4),  Fa(4) 
would  then  Ixi  absent.  These  lines  were  at  firstt  assigned  by  PASCHEN  to  a  new 
doublet  set  of  series,  but  later}!  to  combinations  of  his  new  singlet  series  with  D,  ( oo ), 
D.,  ( w ).  This  question  will  be  considered  as  a  whole  later,  but  the  suggested 
explanation  given  above  points  rather  to  the  fact  that  we  have  to  do  with  a  triplet 
series  in  which  the  third  number  is  too  faint  to  be  observed. 

*  DC00)  stands  as  usual  for  DI  (  oo  )  or  Dj  (  oo ). 

t  '  Ann.  d.  Phys.,'  29,  p.  650  (1909). 

|  'Ann.  d.  Phys.,'  30,  p.  749  (1909). 

VOL.  CCXIII. A.  3    A 


362 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 


Hg. 

The  D  series  of  Mercury  shows  a  marked  divergence  from  those  of  the  other 
elements  so  far  considered  in  that  (l)  the  separations  of  the  satellites  increase  as  tli.-y 
go  from  the  chief  line,  (2)  the  satellites  do  not  seern  to  correspond  in  the  different 
orders,  and  (3)  there  are  a  larger  number.  The  increased  tendency  which  this  element 
has  shown  to  break  up  into  collaterals  appears  also  here.  One  is  led  to  infer  that 
with  varying  conditions  of  the  production  of  the  light  different  collaterals  appear. 

The  dependence  on  the  oun  is,  however,  here  clearly  shown,  and  the  evidence  is  all 
the  stronger  because  the  magnitude  of  <*,  itself  is  large  (.363)  and  because  all  the 
apparently  unconnected  differences  come  within  close  multiples  of  <V  This  is  clearly 
seen  in  the  following  table  where  the  denominator  differences  are  exhibited 
together : — 

3980  =  11^-11          6909  =  19^-15  346=      ^-17 

6201  =  m,  +  32  6530  =  18^+  2  5398  =  15^-45 
5782  =  16^-20  6262  =  17^  +  93  9750  =  27^-48 
7989  =  22<S,+  6  18516  =  51^-10. 

It  is  still  possible  within  errors  that  the  differences  for  the  first  satellites  shall  be 
the  same  as  for  the  second  and  succeeding,  viz.,  17<51(  but  it  is  very  unlikely.  For  the 
second  satellites  this  cannot  hold.  It  is  clear  that  the  regular  law  is  not  contradicted, 
but  is  upset  by  the  formation  of  new  configurations  or  aggregations  in  the  oscillators. 

The  table  is  drawn  on  £  =  '8.  This  brings  in  the  best  agreement  and,  moreover, 
brings  S  ( » )— supposing  it  and  D  ( °° )  are  the  same — closer  to  the  value  found  from 
the  first  three  lines.  The  value  given  in  [II.]  being  one  modified  slightly  to  bring  all 
calculated  (even  for  m  =  l)  within  limits.  The  agreement  is  seen  to  be  remarkably 
close.  It  is  to  be  expected  that  the  differences  for  the  satellites  of  the  same  lines 
will  be  more  accurate  than  the  differences  between  the  chief  lines  themselves,  and 
this  is  exemplified  in  the  table.  The  observation  errors  after  m  =  6  are  too  con- 
siderable to  draw  certain  conclusions  from.  Apparently  the  denominators  increase 
by  small  multiples  of  S  to  about  m  =  8  and  then  remain  constant. 

Al. 

In  Al,  the  satellite  differences  deviate  from  the  ordinary  rule  in  that  they  increase 

with   increasing  order   for  m  =  2,  3,  4.       They  are    94,   800    and   1380,  and  by  no 

stretching  to  the  extreme  possible  errors  can    the  two  last   be  made  equal.     The 

inequality  is  certain.     Moreover,  the  observed  differences  are  very  close  to  multiples 

If  the  first  satellite  position  be  calculated  from  D21,  its  difference  is  110,  the 

observed  is  94  and  4<S  =  106,  94  can  be  106  within  limits.     D21  gives  in  the  same  way 

=  3,  the  same  as  observed  and  1468  for  m  =  4  instead  of  1380.     The  last 

may  be  the  same  as  the  observed  within  limits,  but  as  52^  =  1381 '6  and  553  =  1462, 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY   OF  SPECTRAL  SEKIIX 

it  is  possible  there  may  be  this  difference  and  VDS1  (4)  is  not  VD,,(4)  as  in  the  typical 
cases.  The  real  difference  may  be  any  multiple  between  52<J  and  55i.  In  fact  3  is  so 
small  that  there  is  not  absolute  certainty. 

AID  has  proved  itself  the  most  intractable  series  to  bring  into  any  simple  formula 
of  the  ordinary  kind.  It  was,  in  fact,  the  difficulty  with  this  element  which  first  led 
mi-  to  seek  another  solution — on  the  lines  now  being  considered. 

It  will  be  seen  that  it  lends  strong  support  to  the  theory  suggested.  The  table  is 
arranged  with  £  =  2 '66.  The  exactness  of  the  relations  there  shown  is  very 
remarkable,  and  when  it  is  remembered  that  A  is  a  large  number  like  1754,  the 
practically  exact  multiples  referring  to  the  first  five  lines  must  carry  very  great 
weight  in  the  argument  that  AID  at  least  is  subject  to  a  modification  of  successive 
denominators  by  multiples  of  certain  units.  The  objections  to  the  arrangement  are 
two  :  (l)  that  £  =  2'66  is  outside  the  error  limits  of  S  ( o°),  and  (2)  the  denominators 
appear  to  go  on  diminishing  without  reaching  a  limit.  A  slight  alteration,  however, 
in  A  will  get  over  the  first.  For  instance,  if  A  =  1754  — '5,  £  would  be  about  '5  less, 
D(oo)  would  be  within  limits  of  8(00),  and  the  same  arrangement  would  also  hold, 
but  it  could  not  be  much  more  diminished  because  with  m  =  5  and  6  the  changes 
introduced  into  the  denominators  by  £  would  upset  the  multiples  54  and  29.  A 
change  of  A  by  —'5  would  change  the  ratio  to  w*  from  361'88  to  36178.  D(oo)  is, 
therefore,  probably  very  close  to  48163'62. 

If  £  =  —10,  the  denominators  tend  to  a  limit  about  '107  for  m  =  7  and  beyond. 
But  this  is  far  outside  permissible  limits  of  D(oo),  and,  moreover,  the  striking 
arrangement  with  multiples  of  A  is  quite  upset.  We  must  therefore  conclude  either 
that  the  limit  is  not  reached  until  an  order  m  =  10,  or  beyond,  or  collaterals  enter. 
If  the  former,  multiples  of  A  can  enter,  but  the  observation  errors  are  too  large  to 
give  certainty.  If  collaterals  based  on  (9<5)D(oo)  are  used  with  £  =  2' 16  or 
D(oo)  =  48163'62  the  mantissas  for  7,  8,  9  come  respectively  to  '11:3569,  '113590, 
'113956,  and  for  10  for  a  VDU  =  VTX,,,  113700.  The  separation  observed  for  m  -  10 
is  107'96  instead  of  1 12'15, 'either  an  observation  error  or  a  displacement  of  Dn  or  Da,. 
A  displacement  of  D,,  by  +  2$  on  D(o°)  brings  the  separation  very  nearly  correct, 
although  the  observation  error  in  the  wave  number  of  these  two  lines  is  as  large  as 
4 '4,  it  is  probable  their  difference  is  much  more  exact  and  that  the  defect  shown  by 
v  =  107  is  real.  (For  m  =  10,  Dn  is  practically  =  Dia.)  The  results  therefore  go  to 
show  that  the  D,  and  Da  lines  for  m  =  7,  8,  9,  10  are  collaterals,  (9c$)D(oo),  except 
that  for  D(lO)  an  extra  displacement  of  2<5  is  added.  Although  the  numbers  above 
are  so  nearly  equal  we  must  not  place  too  much  reliance  on  them,  as  the  observation 
errors  have  a  very  large  effect  on  the  denominators  for  such  high  orders.  If  the 
suggested  arrangement  is  correct  it  must  mean  that  K.  and  B.'s  measurements  must 
have  been  of  a  very  high  order  of  exactness,  which  would  further  mean  that  the 
measures  for  the  D.,  lines  would  not  be  so  exact  since  the  observed  values  of  the  v  for 
m  =  7,  8,  9  are  respectively  —'68  (possibly  real  on  Da),  '7,  '13  in  error. 

3  A  2 


:;.;i  DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

I  am  inclined  therefore  to  think  that  the  exact  equality  for  (  +  9^)  is  a  coincidence, 
especially  as  the  difference  for  m  =  6  and  7  is  not  a  multiple  of  A  like  the  others. 
Taking  the  corrected  D(w)  =  48163'62,  the  mantissa  for  m  =  6  is  '1  1(5154,  giving 
with  M  13569  a  difference  2585  =  (l+£)  A-46,  which  is  as  far  as  it  can  l)e  from  a 
multiple  of  A. 

If  +  7S  be  taken  for  the  collateral,  and  5A  for  the  difference,  the  limiting 
denominator  is  '107384  and  the  corresponding  O  —  C  are  —'03,  +'03,  '07.  Now  these 
make,  as  against  the  observed  D3  lines,  the  values  of  vl  about  correct,  which  gives  a 
certain  amount  of  weight  to  this  arrangement  of  collaterals  based  on  (  +  7S). 

In  the  foregoing  the  conclusions  up  to  m  =  6  may  be  taken  as  well  based.  No 
definite  answer  can  be  given  to  the  question  of  what  happens  beyond  m  =  G,  although 
the  balance  of  evidence  perhaps  points  to  the  last,  viz.,  collaterals  based  on  (  +  7^), 
and  this  is  strengthened  by  considerations  which  follow. 

MANNING*  has  recently  observed  under  diminished  pressure  certain  groups  of  lines 
which  by  their  look  suggest  doublets  and  satellites  related  to  the  D  type.  The 
strongest  set,  apparently  a  Dn  and  D2  doublet,  are  4260'05,  4241  '25,  giving  a 
separation  of  104'05  ('5).  If  4260'05  be  treated  as  having  the  same  limiting  term  as 
the  D  series,  the  denominator  of  the  VD  part  comes  out  to  be  2107364  (21).  Now 
this  mantissa  has  the  limiting  value  according  to  the  supposition  of  the  preceding 
paragraph,  viz.,  107384.  If  this  is  not  a  mere  coincidence,  the  connection  should 
throw  a  great  deal  of  light  on  the  relations  of  these  series,  and  would  warrant  a  more 
searching  discussion. 

This  would,  however,  lead  too  far  from  the  immediate  point  at  issue.  It  will  be 
sufficient  merely  to  indicate  somewhat  more  clearly  the  connection.  With  the  limit 
(7<J)D(oo)  the  mantissa  of  D1(7)  is  299A  below  that  of  m  =  2  (see  Table  II.), 
and  it  should  therefore  be  (with  D  (oo)  =  48163'62)  631328  (25)  -83£-299A, 
whilst  that  of  MANNING'S  4260  is  107364(21)  -42^.  If  these  are  the  same 
299A  =  523964  (46)  -41f 

A  =  1752'388--14£±-15, 

and  this  gives  S  =  361'55<  which  is  too  small.  But  in  this  D(7)  of  the  accepted 
series  is  referred  to  (7$)  D  (  oo  ),  whereas  4260  is  referred  to  D  (  o>  ).  If  it  be  referred 
also  to  (7<5)D(oo),  its  mantissa  is  107868  (21)  - 


and  299A  =  524468  (45)  -41£ 

A  =  1754-073±'15--14£ 
and  therefore  of  the  right  order  with  $  =  36T89W2. 

MANNING'S  new  lines  suggest,  on  a  superficial  glance,  a  series  of  bands,  but  there 

-tie  doubt  of  their  connection  with  the  Diffuse  series.     Their  relations  to  one 

another  can  be  discussed  either  on  the  basis  of  the  old  D  (  oo  )  or  of  (7$)  D  (  oo  ).     With 

Observed  in  my  laboratory,  since  published  in  '  Astrophys.  Joura.,'  May,  1913. 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  365 

f)  as  D,,  (intensity  10)  goes  4241'25  as  D.,,  (intensity  9).  D,,-112'15  should 
give  DIt  s  4261 '58.  This  lias  not  been  observed,  but  it  is  D,,(l)(— 13<5).  In  fact, 
the  error  Ix-tween  this  calculated  value  and  that  deduced  from  1).,,  is  only 
dX  =  '02,  and  a  satellite  difference  of  13(5  is  more  in  accordance  with  that  of 
other  elements  than  the  small  one  of  14(5,  in  the  accepted  series.  Amongst  the  other 
linns  are  the  collaterals  4280'4  (intensity  9)  =  (A)  (4260)  with  O-C  =  -'04,  and 
436.V7  (intensity  2)  =  (5A)  (4260)  with  O-C  =  '1. 

In. 

As  in  the  case  of  Al,  so  In  shows  an  increase  of  satellite  differences  with  the  order. 
The  first  three,  58,  26(5,  26(5  may  be  considered  as  certain,  but  the  next,  32(5,  although 
it  is  close  to  the  observation,  may,  as  in  the  case  of  aluminium,  be  the  same  as  the 
others  (268)  within  error  limits,  owing  to  the  large  error  in  D,,.  K.R.  gives  the 
iliU'erence  in  wave-lengths  as  1'04  A.U.,  whilst  HARTLEY  and  ADENEY  in  the  spark 
give  it  as  '4,  i.e.,  closer.  In  the  table  it  is  entered  as  32(5  as  being  closer  to  the 
olwervations,  but  if  it  really  is  26(5,  the  O— C  is  +'20  against  O  =  '50.  It  is  possible 
that  many  cases  of  diffuseness  may  be  due  to  the  simultaneous  existence  of  several 
collaterals  based  on  differences  of  St,  which  for  lines  where  m  is  large  or  for  small 
wave-lengths  give  differences  in  X  too  small  to  resolve.  In  this  case,  for  instance, 
with  m  =  5  a  displacement  by  (5,  produces  collaterals  differing  by  about  '006  A.U., 
and  several  would  give  the  impression  of  a  nebulous  line,  broadened  on  one  side  or 
the  other.  For  m  =  6  there  is  clearly  some  collateral  change  different  in  Dn  and  Dai. 
For  if  Dj2  be  calculated  from  D.^  it  gives  a  position  for  D12  of  longer  wave-length 
than  Dn,  or  the  inverse  of  the  typical  order.  No  conclusions  therefore  can  be  drawn 
as  to  the  satellite  differences  for  m  =  6,  except  that  D21  is  probably  of  the  form 
(zJ)  Dj,,.  Beyond  this  it  is  curious  that  the  D2  lines  persist  while  the  D,  lines  do  not, 
which  may  l)e  accounted  for  by  their  being  also  like  m  =  6  additive  collaterals. 

Again,  also,  the  order  differences  show  themselves  as  close  multiples  of  S.  The 
table  is  based  on  £  =  0,  but  it  may  be  brought  into  still  closer  agreement  by  taking 
£  a  small  negative  number,  about  —'2  to  —  "4.  The  difference  between  5  and  6 
becoming  suddenly  so  large  (59463  order  124(5)  and  the  entrance  of  the  peculiarity 
mentioned  above,  suggest  that  some  collateral  influence  comes  in.  Further,  if  we 
regard  the  denominators  of  D.,,  or  of  D,,  calculated  from  D.,,  —  v,  after  a  small 
difference  of  8824,  the  differences  begin  again  to  increase.  This  has  always  in  the 
previous  cases  pointed  to  a  collateral  displacement  in  D(oo).  The  first  object  is  to 
see  by  what  displacement  the  denominators  may  be  brought  to  a  limiting  uniform 
value.  If  £  be  put  - 13,  the  denominators  for  m  >  5  become  715818,71 4394,  7 1 6 1 98, 
715743,  7222,  7319.  Omitting  the  values  for  m  =  10  and  11,  in  which  the  probable 
errors  are  very  large,  it  is  clear  that,  allowing  for  quite  reasonable  observation  errors, 
the  denominators  are  in  the  neighbourhood  of  a  limiting  value.  Now,  a  collateral  of 
(  +  2(5,)  in  D(oo)  produces  a  displacement  of  — 13'48,  and  this  makes  the  denominator 


366  DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

for  m  =  6  to  be  716474,  and  this  is  23931  below  the  observed  denominator  for  D2(5). 
Now,  50S  =  23850,  which  is  the  same  as  the  difference  for  m  =  4  and  5  instead  of 
being  less,  as  analogy  with  others  would  lead  us  to  expect.  But  the  observation 
errors  are  large  (maximum  of  order  18<5,  about)  so  that  room  is  allowed  for  this. 
There  would  then  be  one  step  from  m  =  5  to  6  of  something  less  than  50(5  combined 
with  a  collateral  displacement  of  (  +  2^)  on  D  (  oo  ).  To  indicate  the  explanation  this  is 
entered  in  the  table,  a  difference  of  50S  making  the  denominator  for  D  (6)  =  6716653. 
The  observed  abnormality  as  between  Du(6)  and  D21-i/  =  D12(6)  is  that  the  wave 
number  of  Dn  is  1'26  less  than  D12,  whereas  it  should  be  8  or  9  greater,  with  a 
denominator  about  32  S  greater  instead  of  1721  less.  There  is,  in  fact,  a  further 
defect  beyond  the  normal  value  of  about  36d  Thus,  if  the  difference  for  D2(5,  6)  is 
xS,  that  of  DI  (5,  6)  is  (x  +  36)  S.  The  lines  would  then  be  represented  as  follows  :— 

d,  =  755767,         d2  =  740503, 


D,(m)  = 

The  collateral  addition  intensifies  D2  and  explains  its  continuance,  but  in  Dj  the 
increase,  owing  to  addition  of  2^  to  D  (  oo  ),  is  overweighted  by  the  diminution  of  the 
excess  36S  in  the  VD  part,  and  so,  after  the  first,  the  rest  are  too  faint  to  observe. 
At  least,  that  is  a  suggestion  of  a  possible  explanation. 

Tl. 

In  Thallium  the  satellite  separations  appear  to  be  the  following  multiples  of  <^  : 
24,  27,  28,  28,  28.  But  so  far  as  limits  of  error  permit,  they  might  be  24,  27,  27, 
27,  27.  A  peculiarity  appears  in  the  D  lines  in  that  the  doublet  separation  for  the 
first  set  is  7793'08  (48),  whereas  the  normal  value  is  very  close  to  7792'39.  The 
difference  is  therefore  real  and  not  attributable  to  observation  errors.  Moreover,  the 
next  four  show  a  gradual  diminution,  although  still  remaining  normal  within  extreme 
permissible  errors.  The  doublet  values  beyond  this  depend  for  the  measurements  of 
the  second  line  on  measurements  of  CORNU.  They  give  separations  15  to  20  less 
than  normal,  but  little  reliance  can  be  placed  on  deductions  from  them,  for  COBNU'S 
results  may  err  possibly  by  several  units  in  the  first  decimal  place,  and  with  these 
small  wave-lengths  any  error  in  X  is  multiplied  by  22  to  23  in  the  wave  numbers. 
I  have,  therefore,  not  brought  them  into  the  discussion. 

The  table  is  based  on  £  =  '3,  though  no  attempt  has  been  made  to  find  the  best 
value.  The  mantissa  of  the  first  line  is  abnormal,  since  it  is  less  than  the  second 
instead  of  greater,  and,  moreover,  its  difference  from  it  cannot  be  a  multiple  even  of  S^ 
Since  the  satellite  difference  is  very  close  to  such  a  multiple  (9048  =  6<S  +  4)  it  is 
probable  that  the  abnormality  affects  both  in  the  same  manner.  Now  the  arrangement 
may  be  made  normal  by  regarding  the  first  line  as  a  collateral  (<!,)  Dj  (2).  The 


I)K.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SKRIKS.  U67 

addition  of  5,  to  the  denominator  of  D(oo)  produces  a  change  —  19"19,  and  this 
changes  the  denominator  of  VD  to  those  '  given  in  the  table,  and  as  is  seen  now, 
produces  a  difference  of  2^,  tatween  it  and  the  next.  Now,  this  alteration  in  D  (  »  ) 
diminishes  the  value  of  v  by  5'65,  whilst,  as  we  have  seen  alx>ve,  it  is  apparently  '69 
too  much  —  or  VDa(2)  is  5'65  +  '69  =  6'34  below  the  value  of  VD,,(2).  Now,  this  is 
just  the  change  made  by  deducting  2<\  from  the  denominator  of  VD,,.  The  exact 
value  is  6"74,  which  is  within  the  limits.  The  way  in  which,  witli  the  considerable 
numbers  involved  (i$,  =  377),  all  the  different  abnormalities  are  simultaneously  made 
to  fit  in  with  a  normal  scheme  gives  some  confidence  that  this  is  the  real  explanation. 
The  scheme  of  actual  lines  may  be  represented  thus  :— 

Actual  Du  (2)  =  (  +  £,)  DM  (2), 
„       D13(2)  =  (  +  <*,)  D,,(-24,M, 


Contrary  to  the  case  in  other  elements  the  successive  differences  are  equal  after  the 
first,  and  the  limiting  value  of  the  denominator  is  reached  at  m  =  7.  They  can  all 
from  7  to  14  be,  within  limits,  equal;  but  there  is  an  apparent  rise  with  the  high 
orders. 


O. 


Two  series—  one  of  doublets  and  one  of  triplets—  have  been  recognised  in  oxygen. 
The  table  shows  that  the  D  lines  of  both  sets  fall  into  line  quite  naturally  with 
multiples  of  A,  closely  except  in  the  case  in  the  doublet  sets  of  m  =  7,  8 
these  cases  the  denominators  are  equal  within  limits,  but  much  larger  than  those  for 
m  =  6  instead  of  being  less,  and  the  deviation  is  real  since  the  difference  is  more 
than  15  times  the  probable  error  for  m  =  7,  and   T5  times  that  for  m  =  6,  which 
latter  has  a  very  considerable  probable  error  "5  as  against  '07.*      The  divergence  for 
m  =  8  can  be  accounted  for,  as  it  is  probable  that  there  are  two  close  lines  here  due 
to  different  series,  viz.,  that  for  this  series  m  =  8  and  the  other  for  a  parallel 
for  which  m  =  5,  and  may  therefore  be  stronger.     As  it  throws  some  light 
subject  it  may  be  well  to  say  a  few  words  about  it  here.     RUNGE  and 
three  lines  at  626478,  6261'68,  6256-81,  with  separations  7'83,  12"43,  and  mtens 
1,  3,  1,  so  that  the  centre  is  the  strongest.     There  is  a  corresponding  s 
5408-80   5405-08,  with  the  same  separations  within  error  limits  and  mtensit: 
again  with  the  centre  strongest.     The  strongest  lines  of  these  two  triplets  forn 
series  with  the  observed  value  of  D"  (8).     They  are  of  a  diffuse  type  and 

*  These  are  not  to  be  confounded  with  K.R.'s  possible  errors.    The  po«ible  errors  are  probably 

larger. 


368  DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL   STUDY   OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

come  between  the  D'"  and  D"  series.     The  limit  taken  is  22926' 11  and  the  scheme  is 

as  follows : — 

O  -  C.  O. 

3'969545-8    ....  '01  '03 

6A, 
4-968512  +  7  ....  0  '04 

6A! 
5-967480  +  24.  ...  0  '5 

Moreover,  the  difference  between  the  first  denominator  and  the  corresponding  one  for 
D'"  is  2924,  and  this  is  17Aj.  It  is  of  course  understood  that  the  digits  "11  in  the 
limit  have  been  chosen  so  that  the  l7Aj,  6A1;  come  very  close.-  The  argument 
depends  on  the  possibility  of  doing  this.  In  fact  RYDBERG'S  tables  give  the  limit 
22926,  so  that  the  modification  by  '11  is  extremely  slight.  Thus  the  observed  line  is 
the  line  corresponding  to  m  =  5  of  this  series,  and  it  probably  hides  the  weaker  line 
of  D"  (8).  This  accounts  for  the  deviation  noted  above  between  calculated  and 
observed  in  D"  (8).  I  have  no  explanation  to  offer  for  the  corresponding  deviation 
for  m  =  7.  All  the  others  come  so  close  that  it  is  difficult  to  imagine  that  this  does 
not  fall  in  with  the  rule.  It  is  equivalent  to  an  error  in  X  of  about  1'2  A.U.  The 
doublet  separation  for  D"  is  "62  very  closely,  and  the  corresponding  doublet  difference 
is  15(5j  =  A  say.  A  lateral  displacement  of  7 A  on  the  limit  would  just  make  the 
change,  but  that  explanation  seems  out  of  place  here.  The  separations  7' 8 3,  12 "4 3 
of  the  new  lines  require  denominator  differences  in  the  limit  of  373  and  473,  and 
4A2  =  380  and  5A2  =  475.  There  is  another  line  at  6267'06,  showing  a  separation  of 
5 "81  ("3).  If  this  has  the  same  VD  as  6261  it  requires  a  denominator  difference  in 
the  limit  of  277  and  3A2  =  285..  The  four  lines  aj-e  therefore  (-5A2)  (6261), 
(-3A2)  (6261),  6261,  and  (  +  5A2)  (6261). 

S. 

If  RUNGE  and  PASCHEN'S  estimates  of  their  errors  are  valid  the  value  of  the  limit 
of  the  S  series  is  determinable  very  accurately.  It  is  20085 '46  (l'34),  but  to  bring 
m  =  7  as  calculated  within  limits  it  is  necessary  to  take  S  ( oo )  more  than  1  less. 
Accordingly  the  D  lines  have  been  calculated  on  the  supposition  that  D  (  oo )  =  20084 '5, 
and  it  cannot  be  far  from  this.  To  bring  the  differences  within  multiples  it  has  been 
necessary  to  diminish  this  limit  by  putting  £  =  -'3.  The  multiples  then  come  in 
partly  as  multiples  of  A2  and  partly  of  A,.  The  value  of  A2  given  in  the  first  part 
of  the  paper  is  651,  but  this  gives  A2  =  35  x  180'67w2,  whereas  it  should  be,  if 
the  rule  there  established  is  correct,  in  the  neighbourhood  of  180 '9,  or  -^  larger, 
say  6517.  This  value  has  been  adopted  in  the  table,  although  the  old  one  can  be 
made  to  fit  in  though  not  so  well.  The  agreement  is  good,  especially  when  it  is 
remembered  that  K.  and  P.'s  estimates  are  less  than  possible  errors, 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

Se. 

The  lines  allotted  by  RUNGE  and  PASCHEN  to  the  D  series  present  a  quite  different 
appearance  from  the  normal,  although  there  can  be  little  doubt  but  that  they  form 
the  SeD.     The  weak  satellite  lines  after  the  first  appear  on  the  violet  side  of  the 
strong  lines,  whereas  in  all  other  yet  known  cases  they  lie  on  the  red  side.     Moreover, 
the  strong  lines  instead  of  standing  by  themselves  are  each  the  first  members  of 
complete  triplets  for  m  =  4,  5,  6,  7  (m  =  4  is  the  first  set  observed).     The  numbers  in 
the  table  are  calculated  with  D(oo)  =  19274.     The  value  of  S(<»)  calculated  from 
(4,5,6)  is  19275*10  (2'4),  but  it  requires,  as  in  S,  a  further  diminution  of  over  1 
(i.e.,  within  error  limits)  to  bring  in  the  fifth  line.     Hence  D(»)  cannot  be  far  from 
19274.     The  value  of  S  is  calculated  from  A,  +  Aa  =  161  x90-40w*,  and  consequently 
must  be  considered  very  exact.     A,  and  A2  are  calculated  by  transferring  15w*  from 
calculated   A2   to    A,,  making   the   values    28ix36r62ws   and    12  x  361*61^.      The 
numbers  calculated  fi-om  the  observed  values  are  given  in  a  separate  list.     A  glance 
shows  that  the  usual  regularity  is  here  quite  upset,  and  one  feels  convinced  that 
some  disturbing  influence  must  have  been  at  work.     If  we  examine  the  wave  numbers 
of  the  first  four  sets  as  exhibited  in  the  following  table,  we  notice  that  for  the  first 

J~      (14149-27)?  (3)14252-84  (3)  14300'31 

:41(5)  14156-19  (3)1425976 

f(6)  15803-95  (3)  15907'80 

5 1(1)  15804-95  (1)15908-67  (4)  15953'89 

J(5)  16768-10  (1)  16872-15 

31(1)  16769-17  (1)16872-67  (3)  16917"33 

f(7)  17375-92  (l)  17482'33  (3)  17523'15 

=  7  1(2)  17379-58  (7)  17483'00  (4)  17527'20 

set,  we  should  expect  a  weak  satellite  about  6'92  behind  14156,  which  is  not  likely 
to  have  been  observed  in  that  region  far  in  the  red.     Its  difference,  3129,  is  close  1 
55^  =  3118,  and  provisionally  we  may  regard  this  as  normal     The  next  two  triplt 
(ro  =  5,6)  give  separations  respectively  TOO  and  1'07,  corresponding  to  a  lateral 
displacement  in  D(»)  of  S,  (S,  actually  gives  '925  displacement), 
separation  is  3'66  corresponding  to  a  displacement  of  S  (4*.  gives  3*7). 
for  this  line  the  intensity  has  increased  from  5  to  7  and  gives  suspicion  of  a  d 
ment  by  addition.     If  we  suppose  that  the  chief  lines  have  a  lateral  displa 
(  +  J)D  («)  it  means  adding  370  to  their  wave  numbers,  i.e.,  they  are  now 
and  16771-80,  and  they  come  27,  2'63  in  front  of  their  satellites,  which,  allowing  i 
errors  in  observation,  is  in  fair  order  with  the  first  separation  6'95. 
only  is  the  strong  line  abnormally  more  intense  than  for  m  - 
VOL.  ccxur. — A.  3  B 


370 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL   STUDY  OF   SPECTRAL   SERIES. 


also — which  suggests  they  are  both  displaced — a  suspicion  increased  by  the  abnormal 
increase  of  the  difference  shown  in  the  table  of  denominators  between  6  and  7. 
Provisionally  the  least  change  is  to  suppose  the  faint  line  displaced  by  $  and  the 
strong  line  by  2<S,  as  it  must,  as  was  noted  above,  be  $  more  than  the  faint  line. 

For  m  =  8  it  is  cxirious  that  only  one  line  occurs  and  no  triplets.  This  suggests 
that  there  is  no  intensification  by  lateral  displacement,  and  that  provisionally  it  should 
be  taken  as  normal.  The  table  of  difference  shows  an  abnormal  increase  instead  of  a 
decrease,  but  this  may  be  due  to  observation  errors.  If  we  now  calculate  the 
denominators  for  m  =  4,  5,  6,  7,  on  the  above  suppositions,  displacing  the  lines  for 
m  =  9,  10  also  by  S,  we  get 


•626133(108) 
•622797  (?) 
•617055  (?) 
•612509(480) 


4'629262  (54)  3129 

4326 
S'624936  (56)  2139 

4406 
6'620530  (105)  3475 

4216 
7'616314(240)  3805 

5256 
8-611058(728) 

3629 
9-607429  (643) 

9090 
10-59833 


Thus  the  changes  indicated  by  the  appearance  and  arrangement  of  the  lines  have 
brought  the  denominators  and  satellites  into  greater  accordance  with  the  general 
rule.  The  practical  constancy  of  denominator  differences  is  exhibited  also  in  Tl.  The 
only  outstanding  irregularity  appears  to  be  the  satellite  difference  for  m  =  5. 
A  lateral  displacement  of  —  <\  in  D  ( oo)  would  decrease  the  denominator  by  743,  and 
increase  the  difference  from  2139  to  2882.  It  is  better  to  leave  the  difference 
without  an  attempt  of  explanation  at  present. 

The  second  list  has  been  drawn  up  on  this  basis,  taking  £  =  —  '1  as  the  errors  are 
somewhat  smaller  with  this  value.  The  denominator  for  m  =  10  is  left  without 
further  change.  Another  displacement  of  2^  would  bring  it  also  19S  below  that  for 
m  =  9,  but  the  observation  errors  render  any  deductions  quite  unreliable.  The 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  ClilTICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  371 

suggested  scheme  of  actual  lines  may  therefore  be   represented   as  follows  where 
Dn,  DH  stand  for  the  normal  type,  and  D,,(m)  =  Dn  (m)  (-55J,)  :- 

D.,  (4),  D13(4) 

(  +  ^)DU(5),  Du(5) 

(  +  <*)DU(G),  Dw(6) 

(  +  2J)Dn(7), 

Dn  (8) 


The  order  (4)  of  the  first  line  is  so  large  that  the  error  limits  are  too  wide  for  absolute 
certainty.  In  fact  better  agreement  on  the  whole  for  the  satellites  would  be 
obtained  by  taking  the  difference  as  56^,  i.e.,  4<?u,  <JU  being  specially  associated  with 
this  group  (see  p.  331).  The  line  6269'28  is  separated  from  G2G6'36  by  6'44,  and  is 
therefore  possibly  the  lateral  (  +  2<S)  D,,  (5). 

The  table  shows  of  course  the  known  essential  difference  between  the  liehaviour  of 
the  elements  of  Group  2  and  that  of  Groups  1,  3,  G,  signified  by  the  signs  of  a  in  the 
formula.     It  consists  in  the  fact  that  in  Group  2  the  orders  are  formed  in  succession 
by  the  addition  of  multiples,  whilst  in  the  others  it  is  by  subtraction,  with  the 
exception  that  Cu  and  Ag  of  Group  1  are  additive.     But  there  are  certain  other 
features  which  appear    between  the  different   sub-groups  when    higher   orders  are 
looked  at.     The  alkalies  all  show  a  gradually  decreasing  decrement  with  a  sudden 
dive.     Na  then  shows  a  sudden  rise  continued  for  several  lines,  and  Cs  has  a  similar 
indication.     Cu  and  Ag  with  only  a  few  lines  observed  show  decreasing  incrementa 
The  alkaline  earths  show  decreasing  increments  and  a  sudden  dive  (Mg  excepted). 
The  Zn  sub-group  shows  decreasing  increments  and  then  a  sudden  ascent.     The  Al 
Sub-group  3  show  decreasing  decrements  (Sc  decreasing  increments).     (  )  with  S  and 
Se  show  decreasing  increments.     In  fact,  were  it  not  for  the  very  clear  behaviour  of 
Zn,  Cd,  and  Hg,  the  evidence  would  rather  point  to  the   conclusion  that  in  each 
group,  the  low  melting-point  sub-group  show  subtraction  (at  positive)  and  the  high 
melting-point  addition  (a  negative).     If  this  series  depends  on  a  formula  sequence,  it 
is  difficult  to  see  how  it  can  be  any  simple  algebraic  one  —  the  mantissa  would  rather 
seem  to  depend  on  a  term  similar  to  sin  ma  or  tan  ma.     In  the  detailed  discussion 
above,  however,  it  is  seen  how  these  changes  of  direction  can  be  explained  by  lateral 
displacements.     It  is  noticeable  that  where  the  irregularity  observed  in  the  first  lines 
as  compared  with  the  others  in  the  satellite  differences  appears,  a  similar  irregularity 
exists  also  in  connection  with  the  first  order  differences.     This  is  evident  especially  in 
the  alkalies,  where  the  first  differences  are  so  close  to  exact  multiples  of  A  or  &  as  to 
cause  the  conviction  that  they  really  are  so. 

3  B  2 


372  DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL   STUDY   OF   SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

It  is  a  remarkable  fact  also,  and  one  which  will  probably  be  of  importance  in 
throwing  light  on  molecular  constitution,  that  all  those  elements  which  do  not 
exhibit  satellites  have  order  differences  depending  on  multiples  of  A,  whereas  all  the 
others  (Al  excepted)  depend  on  multiples  of  the  oun,  S  or  <\.  The  elements  without 
satellites  are  Na,  K,  Mg,  possibly  Al,  both  series  of  O,  and  S.  All  these  depend  on 
multiples  of  A2  or  At.  None  of  the  others  do  so,  and  it  may  be  regarded  as  an 
argument  in  favour  of  Kb  possessing  satellite  series  that  its  differences  do  not  depend 
on  A  directly.  It  would  appear  that  Rb  only  begins  to  show  them  for  m  —  3.  For 
m  =  2  the  line  is  not  split  up  into  a  chief  line  and  satellite,  the  doublet  separation  is 
normal,  and  it  is  instructive  to  observe  that  the  order  separation  between  the  first 
set  and  second  line  is  close  to  5  A,  and  only  deviates  from  it  in  the  same  way  that  is 
mentioned  in  the  previous  paragraph.  Also  Ba  seems  to  have  in  the  same  way  no 
satellite  for  m  =  2,  the  separation  is  quite  normal,  and  this  also  shows  a  first  order 
difference  very  close  to  Aj.*  But  Ca,  on  the  contrary,  which  has  a  first  difference 
=  99A2,  possesses  satellites. 

It  is  noticeable  also  that  the  high  atomic  weight  elements  appear  to  follow  more 
regular  and  simple  rules.  Thus  both  Cs  and  Tl  show  descent  by  equal  steps  in  both 
cases  =  3<^. 

The  result  of  the  discussion  would  seem  to  be  that  there  can  be  no  doubt  but 
that  satellite  differences  as  well  as  the  doublet  and  triplet  differences  depend  on 
multiples  of  the  oun.  For  the  other  supposition,  viz.,  that  in  the  Diffuse  series  the 
order  differences  also  depend  on  differences  of  the  oun,  it  can  only  be  said  that  a  case 
has  been  made  out.  The  supposition  in  all  cases  fits  conditions,  but  the  conditions 
are  not  all  sufficiently  definite  to  give  certainty.  After  the  first  two  or  three  orders 
the  observation  errors  are  larger  than  the  Slt  and  even  for  these  the  value  of  Sl  for 
the  low  atomic  weights  is  comparable  with  the  errors.  In  some  of  these  cases, 
however,  multiples  of  A  which  is  much  larger  enter  and  strengthen  the  argument. 
The  strongest  examples  are  those  of  the  alkaline  earths  (small  errors  and  large  A  or 
Sj},  first  lines  of  Cd,  and  Hg,  Al  (series  in  A),  In,  Tl,  and  the  A  series  of  O  and  S. 

The  D  (2)  Term. — If  the  foregoing  theory  of  the  constitution  of  the  Diffuse  series 
is  correct,  it  is  further  necessary,  in  order  to  complete  the  discussion,  to  determine 
the  origin  of  the  first  term.  The  apparently  close  relation  of  the  F  series  to  the  D 
series,  and  the  several  cases  of  collaterals  of  the  former  which  had  been  noted  with 
large  multiples  of  A,  suggested  a  trial  to  see  if  the  denominators  were  multiples  of 
this  quantity.  As  in  cases  where  satellites  are  present,  the  separations  depend  on 
them  and  not  on  the  strong  line,  it  is  natural  to  expect  that  the  satellite  is  a  normal 
line  and  the  strong  line  a  collateral,  and  this  is  found  to  be  justified  by  the  calcu- 
lations on  this  theory.  In  Table  III.  the  first  column  of  figures  gives  the  value  of 
the  denominator  taken  from  Table  II.  The  second  column  gives  the  factors  together 
with  possible  variations.  Thus  the  denominator  of  KDU(2)  =  '853302.  This  has 

*  But  see  discussion  of  BaF  below. 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  373 

TABLE  III. 


Na 

Dn  '988656 

•  

K 

Dn  -853302  =  291  (2932  -27  ±-130-  -3640  =  291A                          361-944 

362-68 

Rb 

1D12  -766216(t)-8S  =  59(12950'84±2-74-  1-44$)  =  59A                361-991 
-108  =  59(12942-06)                                                     a^.?^ 

361-40 

Cs 

D12  •  54698  9  =  857  (638  •  260  ±  •  233  -  •  0887  ft  =  8676                         36  1  •  786 
Dn  -554286  =  17  (32605-06±  13-41  -  4-47?)  =  17A-10S 

361-74 

Cu 
Ag 

>  Theory  of  constitution  uncertain. 

Mg 

DI  -828688 

362-36 

Ca 

Dig  -945972  =  691  (1368-99  ±  -03  -  -047£)  =  691Aj 

361-84 

361-84 

Sr 

DU  -987349,  not  a  multiple. 
D12  -989572  =  178  (5559-39  ±  -25-  -20£)  =  178A.2                           361-738 

360-02 

Ba 

D13  -825511  =  69(11963-9±  1)  =  69A2                                                361-968 
*D18  1-041954  =  87(11976-4)  =  87A.,                                                 362-352 

362-34 

Ra 

Not  observed.      =  31A8.t 

Zn 

D]3  -904978  -  260  (3480-  68  ±  -38-  -430£)  =  260Aj 

361-682 

362-26 

Cd 

Dn  -902039  =  87  (10368  -26  ±  -26-1  -276£)  =  87  ^ 
DIB,  not  a  multiple. 

361-382 

361-392 

Eu 

D1S  -917794  =  50(18355-88±  1-2-28£)  =  50A, 

361-44 

360-93 

Hg 

D13  -921662  =  31(29731-0±l-22-3-80£)  =  31A, 

361-50 

362-46 

Al 

Dn  -631287  =  360(1753-575+  -069  -  -230£)  =  360A 
D12  -631181  =  360  (1753-  280  ±  -069-  -23o|)  =  360A 

361-777 
361-717 

361-879 

In 

D12+16S  =  22(37676±2-18±4-619£)  =  22A                                     361-871 

361-947 

Tl 

D12  =  -888344  =  590(1505-667  +  -136  -  1  -881£)  =  590S                  361-650 
Dn  coll.  =  -899520=  597  (1506-73+  •  136  -  1  -881£)  =  5978             361-913 

362-063 

0 

D'"  -972483  (40)  -120^ 
46(171-66±?)  =  46A, 
D"   -980380  (92)  -121£ 
63(172-063)  =  63A, 
NewD  -969543 

362-  46  ± 
363-308 

361-79 

S 

Di(4;  -553446  =  530  (1044-  24  ±  -088  -  -811^)  =  530A, 

362-113 

362-14 

Se 

Di(4)  observed  -629262  =  99  (6356-  18  ±  -64  -  4'565£)  =  99A, 

361-893 

364-00 

*  See  below  under  discussion  of  BaF — two  different  triplets  in  question, 
t  See  below  under  discussion  of  RaF. 


374  DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

observation  errors  and  also  possible  error  due  to  incorrectness  of  D(<»),  i.e.,  £ 
These  give  the  denominator  as  291  (2932'27±'130-'364£).  Now  2932'27  is  very 
close  to  2939,  which  is  given  as  the  approximate  value  of  A  in  Table  I.  The 
denominator  is  then  written  291  A,  and  with  this  new  value  of  A  the  corresponding 
value  of  the  oun  is  calculated  as  361'944wa  instead  of  the  old  value  362'68w2,  which 
for  comparison  is  entered  next  to  it. 

Notes  on  the  Tables. 

Na.     A  is  so  small  that  several  multiples  of  it  might  be  taken  for  D  within  limits. 

Eb.  DI  does  not  give  a  multiple  of  A  although  close  to  it.  If,  however,  Rb  has 
satellites,  the  denominator  for  D12  will  be  a  few  multiples  of  S  less  than  that  of  Dn. 
That  for  Cs  is  1  l^S  less  in  the  corresponding  case.  The  values  in  the  table  are  given 
for  8(5  and  10<1  Judging  from  the  value  of  the  oun  it  is  probably  near  8<J.  In  any 
case  the  multiple  would  be  59A.  This  is  a  very  strong  argument  that  lib  does 
possess  satellites. 

Cs.     Neither  Dn  or  D12  give  multiples  of  A. 

Mg.  As  in  Na,  A2  is  too  small,  and-  the  denominator  too  large  to  give  anything 
definite. 

Sr.  Dj3  gives  the  oun  clearly  too  small,  although  better  than  in  the  original  table. 
D12>  however,  gives  a  value  361738  quite  close  to  the  probable  value.  A  similar 
result  is  shown  also  by  Cd  which  occupies  an  analogous  position  in  the  next 
sub-group.  If  D13  behaves  in  what  appears  to  be  the  normal  manner,  it  would 
appear  necessary  to  take  the  atomic  weight  to  be  '10  less  than  BBAUNER'S  value,  viz., 
87 '56  in  place  of  87 '66,  which  is  probably  too  large  a  change  to  be  acceptable. 

Ba.  In  Barium  the  first  set  is  doubtful.  That  taken  above  shows  no  satellites. 
The  denominator  is  therefore  that  for  D13,  and  this  is  a  multiple  which  gives  a  value 
of  the  oun  much  nearer  the  probable  value  than  that  in  Table  I.  Evidence  will  be 
given  later  however  under  BaF  that  there  is  a  normal  satellite  triplet,  outside  the 
region  of  observation,  where  D13  has  the  denominator  2 '04 19  54,  which,  from  analogy 
with  the  other  elements  of  this  group,  has  a  "  mantissa"  1 '04 1954,  and  this  is  again  a 
multiple  of  A2.  This,  therefore,  is  probably  the  correct  value,  and  the  other  set  will 
be  collaterally  displaced  from  this  by  18A2. 

Ra.  The  first  line  should  be  far  in  the  ultra  red,  and  has  not  been  observed.  The 
multiple  31A2  is  determined  indirectly  (see  BaF  below). 

Cd.  This  element  shows  the  same  irregularity  as  in  Sr,  in  that  DJ3  does  not  give 
an  exact  multiple  of  A2,  although  one  close  to  it.  Here,  however,  we  have  to  go 
back  to  Dn  before  finding  the  exact  multiple,  and  Dn  gives  almost  the  precise  value 
of  the  oun  as  in  Table  I.,  which  was  itself  very  exact. 

Eu.  D13  is  '917794,  which  is  50A2+1344,  A2  having  the  value  18329  of  Table  I. 
If  it  is  50A2  exactly,  A2  would  be  18355'88-2'28£  making  the  oun  (361'46-'04£)  in 
place  of  360 '93  of  Table  I.,  a  great  improvement. 


DE.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPFXTTRAL  SERIML  J175 

D13  gives  denominator  =  31  x  29731  '0,  and  the  latter  factor  is 

7410-87«r'  =  82x90'375wa, 
which  is  much  closer  to  the  probable  value  of  the  ouu,  and  moreover  82  is  the  correct 


rmiltiple  to  give  54  x  543'816w3  for  A,  +  A^  which  has  been  taken  as  a  basis  for  3. 
This  value  of  A  is  supported  by  the  discussion  of  the  F  series  below. 

Al.  As  the  order  differences  are  all  multiples  of  A,  and  there  may  therefore  be 
some  doubt  as  to  the  real  existence  of  satellites  the  values  for  D,t  and  D,,  are 
inserted.  The  denominators  for  the  two  only  differ  by  4<J  =  108,  or  the  olwerved  by 
96.  As  the  A  differences  can  only  refer  to  the  Dn  set,  it  would  seem  that  these 
should  be  taken  as  the  normal  lines  giving  361777  as  the  value  of  the  oun. 

In.  Neither  I),,  nor  D1:J  are  exact  multiples  of  A  although  they  are  very  close  to 
22A.  D,2  is  1722  x  477'1  1,  or  1723  x  476'83.  If  these  be  taken  as  multiples  of  the 
oun,  they  give  the  oun  as  362'01  and  36T80  in  place  of  36T94  of  Table  I.,  but  the 
multiples  are  too  large  to  found  any  conclusions  upon.  It  would  rather  seem  that 
there  is  some  displacement  from  a  typical  multiple.  Using  A  as  given  in  Table  I., 
viz.,  37684,  22A  =  829048.  So  that  Dw  =  22A-7455  and  7455  =  16f$-177.  If  it 
is  22A  —  16(5  exactly,  A  becomes  8'04  less  and  the  oun  361  '87  lw*  in  place  of 
36T947.  The  value  of  D,.j+16«5  is  therefore  inserted.  If  the  typical  term  were  IG& 
higher,  the  order  differences  would  run  72<5,  62S,  508,  50<S,  in  place  of  58$,  62<5,  &c., 
and  hence  more  in  line  with  others. 

Tl.  Neither  the  observed  nor  the  supposed  collaterals  are  multiples  of  A.  They 
are  expressed  as  multiples  of  S.  Although  they  are  large  multiples,  th«ir  values  are 
quite  definite  provided  we  know  a  priori  that  the  denominators  are  multiples  as 
a  fact.  If  the  multiple  be  altered  by  unity,  the  resultant  quotient  cannot  come 
within  the  limiting  values  of  the  oun. 

If  the  normal  D,.,  (2)  =  7A  =  939078,  the  order  difference  over  DIi((3)  would  be 
939078-888643(89)  =  50435±89,  and  33^=134^  =  50495,  so  that  the  order 
difference  would  come  out  as  usual  a  close  multiple  of  <V  All  this  group  seein  to 
show  the  same  kind  of  irregularity. 

O.  There  are  three  separate  series,  see  data  for  Table  II.,  differing  by  multiples  of 
A!,  just  as  iii  the  order  differences.  A,  is  too  small  to  test  the  multiples  of  the 
denominators  themselves. 

S.  The  D(2),  D(3)  lines  for  S  and  Se  are  beyond  observed  regions.  Sulphur 
however  shows  no  satellites,  and  we  may  surmise  therefore  in  analogy  with  others 
that  the  differences  for  D  (2),  D  (3),  D  (4)  are  like  the  others  multiples  of  A,  or  A,. 
As  a  fact,  D,  (4)  is  a  clear  multiple  of  A,,  and  the  surmise  is  justified  so  far  as  A,  is 
concerned.  The  value  of  £  is  not  very  certain. 

Se.  Se  apparently  has  satellites,  and  the  order  differences  are  only  multiples  of  S. 
It  should  not  therefore  be  expected  that  D,  (4)  or  D3(4)  should  be  a  multiple  of  A,. 
Nevertheless  D!  (4)  is  clearly  such  a  multiple  and  is  entered  in  the  table. 


376  DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

The  table  shows  that  where  triplets  occur  the  multiples  are  those  of  A2  and  not  of 
A,,  except  in  the  case  of  the  oxygen  group  of  elements,  in  which  A!  clearly  takes  the 
place  of  A2.  If  the  law  of  multiples  is  correct,  the  values  of  the  A  obtained  in  this 
way  must  clearly  be  far  more  exact  than  those  obtained  direct  from  the  separations. 
A  glance  at  the  deduced  values  of  the  oun  compared  with  the  former  values  shows 
how  much  closer  to  the  mean  value  361 '9  the  new  ones  are  than  the  old,  and  to  some 
extent  this  adds  to  the  weight  of  the  evidence.  The  cases  where  the  multiples  do  not 
appear  to  enter  are  those  of  lib,  Cs,  In  and  Tl.  The  case  of  Rb  has  been  considered 
above  and  a  natural  explanation  offered.  Cs,  In  and  'I1!  have  all  large  values  of  S,  in 
which  case  we  have  already  seen  a  tendency  for  the  spectra  to  depend  on  smaller 
multiples  of  the  oun  than  the  A.  In  the  case  of  Cs,  the  oun  is  smaller  than  the 
multiple  and  it  can  give  no  evidence  nor  data  for  the  oun.  The  case  is  different 
however  for  Tl.  If  the  oun  enters,  the  multiple  can  be  no  other  than  that  given, 
and  as  is  seen  the  value  of  the  oun  is  improved.  All  the  elements  of  the  Al  group 
show  a  deviation  from  the  normal  type  in  that  the  first  satellite  separations  are  much 
smaller  for  the  first  order  lines  than  for  the  second,  and  seem  to  point  to  some 
displacement.  As  the  Al  orders  differ  by  multiples  of  A,  any  irregularity  in  the 
multiple  between  the  first  and  second  orders  does  not  alter  the  dependence  of  the 
denominator  on  the  multiple  of  A.  In  In  and  Tl,  however,  the  differences  go  by 
multiples  of  §  or  Sl}  and  any  irregularity  on  them  will  throw  out  the  dependence  of 
the  first  denominator  on  a  multiple  of  A.  As  was  shown  above  the  addition  of  16(5  in 
In  not  only  produces  the  multiple,  but  at  the  same  time  shows  a  more  usual  march  of 
differences  for  the  orders.  In  Tl  the  observed  denominator  for  D12  (2)  is  less  than  that 
for  D,2  (3)  and  quite  abnormal.  The  other  anomalies  occur  in  that  in  Sr,  D12  appears 
to  take  the  place  of  D13,  and  in  Cd,  Du.  RaD  (2)  is  in  the  ultra  red  and  has  not  been 
observed.  The  elements  Na  and  Mg  must  be  left  out  of  account  because  the 
ratio  denom./A  must  be  so  large  that  a  number  of  multiples  can  be  found  all  giving  A 
within  observation  limits.  Cu  shows  a  multiple,  but  the  theory  of  the  constitution  of 
the  series  of  Cu  and  Ag  is  doubtful  and  must  also  be  left  out. 

With  the  above  doubtful  cases  the  values  for  K,  Ca,  Sr,  Ba,  Zn,  Cd,  Eu,  Hg,  Al,  S 
and  Se,  are  clearly  exact  multiples,  and  the  large  values  of  A  in  Ba,  Cd,  Eu  and  Hg 
show  that  these  multiples  are  real.  This  rule,  exhibited  as  it  is  in  so  many  cases,  and 
in  by  far  the  majority  of  the  elements  comparable,  must  correspond  to  a  real  relation 
and  cannot  be  due  to  mere  coincidence.  Against  the  reality  of  the  relation  is  the 
antecedent  improbability  that  those  elements  with  the  smallest  value  of  A  should 
have  the  largest  values  of  the  denominator,  as  e.g.,  in  the  case  of  Na  and  Mg.  A 
possible  explanation  is  that  the  mantissa  is  the  nearest  multiple  of  A2  to  some  group 
constant.  But  see  also  under  discussion  of  the  F  series.  It  might  however  have 
been  expected  on  this  ground  that  the  denominators  would  be  of  the  form  l-M(A). 
But  the  case  of  Na  is  clearly  against  this.  Its  denominator  "988656  =  1  —  '01 1344 
and  11344  is  15'26A  and  cannot  be  a  multiple.  It  would  seem  conclusive  that  the 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SRKIKS. 


377 


denominators  of  the  extreme  satellites  of  the  first  line  are  multiples  of  A,  or  A,  and 
that  explanations  should  be  sought  for  apparent  exceptions. 


The  S  and  P  Series. 

The  relationships  between  the  doublet  and  triplet  sets  of  the  P  series  and  between 
the  S  and  P  series  were  discussed  in  [II.,  p.  51]  by  comparing  the  differences  between 
the  corresponding  denominators.  It  is  now  possible  to  see  how,  if  at  all,  these 
differences  are  related  to  the  oun. 

The  P  Series. — In  the  alkalies  the  differences  between  the  corresponding 
denominators  of  the  two  sets  were  found  to  be  constant  within  error  limits  and 
of  course  equal  to  A.  In  the  other  elements  in  which  the  P  series  have  been 
allocated,  there  was  always  a  drop  in  the  difference,  which  in  several  cases  then 
remained  constant  for  the  succeeding  orders.  The  values  were  given  on  [II.,  pp.  51-53]. 
They  are  reproduced  here,  and  it  is  seen  at  once  how  they  proceed  on  quite  analogous 
lines  with  successive  satellite  differences  of  the  D  series  considered  above.  The 
possible  eiTors  of  the  single  lines  from  which  they  are  deduced  are  given  in  brackets. 
Thus  ZnP(l)  are  1'599352  (2),  F592143  (3),  1'5886G9  (4),  and  the  differences  are 
given  as  7209  (2,  3),  3474  (3,  4).  The  higher  orders,  in  which  the  possible  errors  are 
so  large  as  to  be  themselves  multiples  of  Slt  are  not  included.  The  value  of  <$,  is 
given  with  the  symbol  for  the  element. 

It  will  be  noticed  that  the  more  accurate  the  observations  the  closer  are  the 
differences  to  the  multiples  of  the  oun.  But  the  observed  variations  from  true 
multiples  in  the  case  of  the  large  separations  would  seem  to  point  to  a  difference 
in  the  a  as  well  as  in  the  M-  Iu  any  case  it  would  seem  that  n  must  alter 
per  saltum  from  order  to  order,  unless  the  sequence  formula  is  a  complicated 
function  of  m. 


Zn  (S1  =  3875). 


,  =  113-8). 


7209  (2,  3) 

128-5 
5355  (19,  28) 

8  +  9 
5191  (9,  9) 

8,-! 
5154  (30,  30) 


3474  (3,  4) 

68  +  20 
2525  (28,  36) 

38! -5 
2414(9,9) 

«i 
2375  (30,  30) 


87815  (?) 
118-118 

71967(?) 
28, -122 

71364(1) 


23109(4,5) 
508, -5 
17423(25,25) 

18269  (922) 
17109(26,  28)  J 


38, +  27 


10368  (5,  5) 
308, -26 
6980  (25,  25) 

6461 (1837) 


6407  (28,25)  t 


58, +4 


VOL.  CCXIII. — A. 


Hg  («*,  =  362-87). 

30002  (1) 

148, +  143 
24779  (1) 

38,  — 126  or  28, +  237 
23817  (t) 

3  c 


378  DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

Note  how  Zn  still  affects  <?6.  The  variations  from  multiples  in  Hg  seem  to  have 
relation  to  the  transference  properly  noted  above,  viz.,  from  Aj  to  A2. 

Al  (J,  =  26'57).  Tl  (,?,  =  376-835). 

1751  (1)  134154  (?) 

16S,-3  5382  +  191 

1329(78,78)  94018(1) 

-25t  +  5  23-191 

1377(23,23)  91195(?) 

0-3  2S,-173 

1380(48,48)  90615  (?) 

In  Al  the  value  after  the  first  is  1381  within  limits  of  error  for  all. 

The  S  and  P  Connections. — The  differences  of  the  corresponding  denominators  in 
the  S  and  P  are  also  given  in  [II.].  The  values  are,  however,  subject  to  uncertainties 
due  to  uncertain  limits  in  both  S  and  P,  in  which  the  £  are  not  the  same  for  both. 
In  the  case  of  the  alkalies  there  seems  a  very  clear  connection  with  the  A,  except  in 
Cs,  where  as  often  before  S  enters.  In  the  other  elements  it  was  shown  that  the 
sequences  are  inverted  and  the  differences  are  to  be  taken  between  the  first  of  the  S 
and  the  second  of  the  P.  In  Al,  Tl,  and  Zn,  there  is  again  a  clear  relation,  but  it  is 
now  to  the  denominator  differences  of  the  Pj  (2)  and  P2  (2),  or  1329,  94018,  2525 
respectively,  say  A'  for  each.  In  the  case  of  Cd  and  Hg  no  clear  relation  is  apparent, 
although  they  behave  approximately  like  Al  and  Tl.  This  want  of  exact  agreement 
may  be  due  to  the  effect  of  the  transference  inequalities  considered  above  (p.  333) 
in  connection  with  the  oun.  The  relations  indicated  above  are  shown  in  the  following 
scheme,  in  which  the  differences  for  the  S  and  P  are  taken  from  [II.,  p.  51-53]. 

Na  .     .     .     .  '490162  =  '5-13A, 

K  .     .     .     .  '464597  =  '5-12A, 

Rb  .     .     .     .  '487501  =  '5-A, 

Cs  ....  '491944  =  '5-14(5  (roughly). 

Al      ....     "489330  =  '5-8x1334  =  '5-8A', 
Tl       .     .          .     '594887  = '5  +  94887  = '5  + A'. 

'    Zn     ....     '528306  =  '5  +  11x2573  = -5  +  11A', 
Cd      .     .     .     .     '526358  = '5  +  26358, 
.     .     .     .     '603628  = '5+103628. 


DR.    \V.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  9ft 

The  F  Series. 

In  Part  I.  the  symbol  F  was  used  to  denote  the  series  whose  limit  depends  on  the 
values  of  VD  (2)  in  a  similar  way  to  that  in  which  the  limits  of  the  S  and  I)  series 
depend  on  VP(l).  Where  the  D  writ's  show  satellites  tin-  F  series  in  ronsei|ueii(v 
consist  of  doublet  or  triplet  series  with  constant  separations.  They  comprise  some  of 
the  strongest  lines  in  the  respective  spectra,  but  as  in  general  they  occur  in  the 
ultra-red  region  they  have  not  received  the  same  attention  as  the  other  better  known 
ones.  In  the  alkaline  earths,  however,  they  come  well  within  the  visible  regions,  and 
show  strong  sharply  defined  lines.  They  are  related  also  to  other  strong  lines  by 
collateral  and  other  displacements  depending  on  considerable  multiples  of  A,  and  so 
naturally  come  under  discussion  in  the  present  communication.  As  will  be  seen  later, 
the  discussion  gives  the  means  of  obtaining  very  accurate  determinations  of  the  A— 
and  consequently  of  the  oun — as  well  as  of  settling  other  questions.  I  propose, 
however,  not  to  attempt  an  exhaustive  discussion  in  the  present  communication, 
partly  because  the  main  object  now  is  only  to  illustrate  the  influence  of  the  oun,  and 
partly  because  it  would  seem  that  a  large  number  of  lines  which  clearly  belong  to  the 
F  cycle  are  related  in  a  manner  neither  ordinal  nor  collateral,  nor  according  to  Rm's 
combining  theory.* 

For  convenience  of  reference  the  wave-lengths  of  these  lines  are  given  in  the 
Appendix,  together  with  short  historical  notes. 

The  Alkalies. — The  table  below  gives  the  denominators  for  the  two  first  lines  in 
each  as  calculated  from  PASCHEN'S  and  from  RANDALL'S  results.  BERGMANN'S  measure- 
ments for  other  lines  are  too  much  in  error  for  the  present  objects.  The  limits  used 
are  the  calculated  values  of  VD,  using  the  limits  D(oo)  given  in  Table  II.  above  and 
the  values  of  D  (2)  in  the  Appendix. 

Na.  K.  Bb.  Cs. 

3-997919  (169)  -  219&   3 -992817  (252) -290&   3  •  987849  (433)  -  289£,   3-977334(146)- 
4  -997267  (2845)  -  569£,   4 -989237  (696) -566$,   4  •  983697  (846)  -564£,   4-9698 

5-9710 
6-9642 

The  question  that  first  arises  is,  tlo  these  refer  to  actually  the  first  lines  of  the 
series?     If,  like  I),  the  lowest  value  of  m  were  2,  the  wave  number*  of 
would  be  somewhat  above,  Na,  0 ;  K,  1200;  Bb,  2060;  Cs,  4450. 
be  outside,  but  the  others  come  within  regions  observed  by  PASCHEN.! 

He  gave  for  K  lines  at  wave  numbers  1346'3  and  118: 

*  The  relation  is  extremely  common  in  certain  type,  of  spectra,  e.g.,  the  rare  gase.  other  than  Ho.  I 
hope  to  return  to  this  in  a  future  communication. 

t  "Zur  Kenntnis  ultraroter  Linien-spektra  III.,"  '  Ann.  d.  Phys.,'  33  (1910),  p.  1 

3  o  2 


380  DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

denominator  3'007542  and  the  latter  2'987479,  the  one  apparently  too  large  and  the 
other  too  small  to  fit  in  with  the  progression  of  the  lines  for  m  =  3,  4.  But  the 
mantissa  for  the  latter  is  within  limits  2(5  below  that  for  m  =  3  [see  Note  3  at  end]. 

In  Rb  there  is  a  line  at  wave  number  2129'0  which  would  require  a  denominator 
2'997805,  well  in  step  with  the  other  two.  PASCHEN  identifies  it  as  Di2(3)  — P2(4), 
assuming  the  existence  of  satellites  in  RbD.  It  would  seem  to  be  more  probably  the 
F(2)  sought  for.  There  is  another  line  given  as  2156'!  or  2164'4.  If  the  former  is 
the  more  correct  it  gives  denominator  =  3 '00 11 38.  In  Cs  no  line  appears  with  wave 
number  near  4450.  There  are  two  lines,  however,  with  wave  numbers  3409 '93  and 
3321 '37  which  differ  by  88'56±'6,  and  certainly  suggest  the  doublet  series  depending 
on  the  D(2)  satellite.  This  requires  a  separation  of  97 '96,  and  if  they  belong  to  the 
F  series  there  must  be  a  satellite  with  a  separation  9 '40  ±'6  which  we  should  not 
expect  to  observe  as  being  too  faint.  The  lines  give  a  mantissa  2 '8  5 1708  with  a 
satellite  difference  1003.  The  latter  may  be,  within  limits,  2<5,  a  value  which  in  the 
alkaline  earths  seems  to  be  closely  associated  with  F  satellites.  But  the  mantissa  is 
less  than  that  for  m  =  3,  when  a  larger  value  should  be  expected.  Even  if  not  F  (2) 
itself  it  may  be  related  to  the  F  cycle  in  a  similar  way  to  certain  displacements  found 
in  the  alkaline  earths  (see  pp.  383,  413),  and  it  should  be  noted  that  if  so  there 
seem  to  be  lines  in  corresponding  positions  in  K  and  Rb.  They  are  (in  wave  numbers) 
the  1182'9  referred  to  above  for  K  and  1911 '05  in  Rb.  The  latter  requires  a 
denominator  2'971391.  In  this  connection  it  is  interesting  to  note  that  PASCHEN 
makes  the  remark  that  this  line  at  times  shows  itself  double.  The  separation 
calculated  from  his  numbers  is  1'12,  giving  a  denominator  difference  of  107  for 
F](oo)  and  F3(«>),  i.e.,  for  VDn  (2)  and  VD]2(2).  This  would  indicate  a  sort  of 
incipient  satellite  in  RbD.  These  considerations  seem  to  show  that  there  is  some 
likelihood  that  m  =  3  does  not  give  the  first  line  of  the  F  series,  and  they  will  be  felt 
to  have  greater  weight  when  the  curious  irregularity  in  the  F(2)  of  the  alkaline 
earths  to  be  noticed  immediately  is  taken  into  account.  The  question  is  further 
discussed  on  p.  397  in  connection  with  the  other  elements. 

The  next  question  is,  is  there  any  indication  of  F  satellites  in  the  accepted  lines  ? 
If  so  we  should  only  expect  to  find  it  in  Cs.  Now  RANDALL  gives  weak  lines  8080'9 
close  to  8083'!,  Fj  (4),  and  8018'9  close  to  8020'6,  F2(4).  They  look  like  satellites 
only  on  the  wrong  side.  The  first  changes  the  denominator  by  2000,  which  is  within 
easy  limits  of  1914  =  3^.  It  will  be  shown  that  this  is  a  common  satellite  difference 
in  the  alkaline  earths.  Further,  it  makes  the  denominator  4'9718,  thus  bringing  the 
values  for  m  =  3,  4,  5,  6  in  order,  which  is  not  the  case  in  the  table  above.  There  is, 
therefore,  something  to  be  said  in  favour  of  taking  the  normal  F  (4)  doublet  to  be  at 
8080'9,  8018'9,  and  that  that  is  then  collaterally  displaced  by  3<5  to  the  stronger  lines 
8083'!,  8020'6.  It  is  also  quite  in  keeping  with  analogy  in  the  alkaline  earths  that  a 
similar  displacement  is  not  shown  in  the  case  of  the  first  lines  F(3)  (if  F(3)  are  the 
first  lines). 


DR.  W.   M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  8PFXTTRAL  SERIffi. 


381 


Group  II.  The  Alkaline  Ea/rths. — The  series  are  most  fully  and  regularly  developed 
in  Ca  and  Sr.  In  Ba  and  Ra  the  configurations  which  give  rise  to  the  nonnal  type 
seem  to  be  so  modified  that  displaced  lines  become  common,  and  in  cases  the  normal 
line  has  disappeared.  On  the  other  hand,  Mg  seems  to  range  itself  with  the  Zn 
sub-group.  It  will  be  best  therefore  to  deal  with  Ca  and  Sr  first,  and  as  they  are 
built  on  a  precisely  similar  plan  to  consider  them  together. 

The  following  table  gives  the  wave  numbers  of  the  series  together  with  certain 
others  which  are  clearly  similarly  related  in  the  different  elements.  The  separations 
are  indicated  by  thick  figures.  The  wave-lengths  are  given  in  Appendix  II. 


Ca. 

16203-40     21-75     16225-15 
16204-72 

21799-02     21-13     21820-15    13'58    21833-73 


24391-49  21-50  24412-99  13'66  24426-65 

25793-67  21-64  25815-31  13 "55  25828-86 

26634-00  22-43  26656-43  14-29  26670-72 

27177-76  21-58  27199-34  15-09  27214-43 


Sr. 
14801-57     101-73     14903-30 

15046-98     61-70     15108-68 

20530-76     69-78     20590-54 
20432-18     100-64    20532-82 
20435-10 

23045-78  99-26  23145-04  58'54  23203-58 

24457-06  100-05  24557-11  59  25  24616-36 

25303-32  100-47  25403-79  58 '61  25462-40 
25850-61 


Analogous  Sets  in  Ca  and  Sr. 
17847-46     21-94     17869-40     13'86     17883-26 


17887-55  21-81  17909-34 

18968-53  21-58  18990-10  14'01  19004-11 

Ba. 

13089-79  260-60  13350-39 

13471-69  259-76  13731-45  157'55  13889-00 
13477-44 

18686-80255-17  18941-97 

21308-19  252-51  21560-70  148'32  21709-02 


18061-87  100-20  18162-07  56-61  18218-68 

18239-35  100-62  18339-97 

19016-64  100-34  19116-98  59'75  19176-73 

Ra. 


17793-09 
17300-80  699-93  18000-73 

22037-41  456  64  22494-05 
21350-92  701-89  22052 -«1 


22706- 84'" 
23667-07™ 


22979-57 

23919-27°"       23995-83 

">  F12(5)(A.2).     *F,(6)(9A,). 


382  DK.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

It  is  clear  that  these  lines  also  show  satellites.  Also,  it  is  curious  that  the  first 
sets  of  triplets  apparently  have  the  lines  corresponding  to  the  second  separation 
displaced  below  those  forming  the  first.  Thus  in  Ca  the  second  set  (giving  i/2  =  13'5) 
have  not  been  observed,  in  Sr  the  two  (Vl  =  101,  i>2  =  60)  are  separated  by  a  gap  of 
143,  and  a  similar  effect  will  be  found  later  in  Ba.  Owing  to  this  fact,  the  formulae 
constants  are  calculated  from  the  2nd,  3rd,  and  4th  sets.  They  give  for  Fn — 

Ca 28934-93-N/(m  +  '' 


Sr  27612'37-N/(m  +  '875560  + 


•37-N/( 


m      /  ' 
•100548V 


\  m 

These  give  the  following  values  of  O— C  : — 

m.  2.  6.  7. 

Ca     .     .     .      -1'18          '18          '22 
Sr      .     .     .        •   '42          '05          '02 

The  agreement  is  good,  except  for  m  =  2,  and  in  this  case  the  agreement  is  sufficient 
to  show  that  the  allocation  for  m  =  2  is  correct. 

The  limits  are  close  to  those  of  VDU  (2),  which  is  not  known  with  great  exactness 
because  the  values  of  S  (  oo )  or  D  (  oo )  given  in  [II.]  for  the  second  group  are  subject 
to  possible  errors  of  some  units.  With  formulae  in  ] /m  the  values  ofD(oo)  =  S(oo) 
are  given  [II.,  p.  36]  as  33994'85  for  Ca  and  31037'27  for  Sr,  whilst  with  formulae  in 
1/m2,  the  respective  limits  are  33983'45,  31027'64.  The  values  of  VDn  deduced 
from  these  are-  respectively  28939'93,  27615'65  with  1/m  and  28928'53,  27606'02 
with  1/m2.  The  limits,  therefore,  found  above  for  Fn  ( oo )  lie  each  between  their 
corresponding  values  as  deduced  from  the  D  series  direct.  Assuming  that  the  F  (  oo ) 
are  more  accurate,  the  values  of  D  (oo)  deduced  from  them  are  33989 '8 5  for  Ca  and 
3 1033 '99  for  Sr,  in  both  cases  close  to  the  mean  of  those  in  [II.].  If  the  series 
depend  on  formulae  sequences,  these  limits  may  be  taken  as  close  to  the  correct 
values.  If,  however,  the  different  orders  proceed  by  multiples  of  S  or  A  in  the  way 
illustrated  in  Table  II.  for  the  D  series,  the  limits  may  require  modification  by  a 
few  units. 

As  the  separations  of  the  F  series  depend  on  the  separations  of  the  satellites  of  the 
first  lines  of  the  D  series,  and  these  depend  on  displacements  by  definite  multiples 
of  S,  as  given  in  Table  II.,  it  is  possible  to  calculate  the  values  of  the  former  with 
extreme  accuracy.  Table  II.  gives  13(5  and  8S  as  the  multiples  in  question  for  both 
the  elements  Ca  and  Sr.  Using  the  values  of  S  and  of  the  denominators  of  Dn  there 
given,  the  separations  in  question  calculate  out  to  22'49,  13'75  for  Ca  and  100'34, 
62 '01  for  Sr.  These  may  be  regarded  as  exact  to  the  2nd  decimal  place  and 
independent  of  any  possible  variation  of  £ 


DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  383 

In  the  case  of  Ca  the  observed  lines,  with  differences  somewhat  less  than  22'49  and 
1375,  seem  to  indicate  the  presence  of  close  satellites.  If  16203'40  is  really  Y^(2), 
the  separation  of 'the  first  satellite  is  1'32,  with  possible  errors  ('26±'2G),  which  form 
a  very  considerable  proportion  of  the  total  amount.  A  displacement  of  3<5  produces  a 
separation  of  T51  and  it  may  be  this.  But  16203'40  has  an  excessive  intensity  for  a 
satellite  line,  viz.,  6,  as  against  4  for  Fn,  and,  moreover,  it  may  possibly  be  the 
collateral  Si  (2)  (- A2)  which  gives  O-C  =  '03  with  0  =  '10.  If  the  latter  allocation 
is  correct,  it  would  hide  FJ2,  which  should  be  16225'15('26)— 22'49  =  16202'6G  ('26), 
giving  a  separation  of  2'06  ('52)  due  to  4<$  which  gives  2'02.  The  same  considerations 
applied  to  the  second  set  give  a  separation  of  1'36  for  the  first  satellite,  in  which 
again  4<!  gives  1"26,  and  '22  for  the  second,  S  giving  '32.  The  separations  are  so  small 
that  no  certain  conclusions  can  be  drawn  as  to  their  origin.  The  actually  observed 
numbers  may  be  due  to  4(5  and  S,  but  3S  and  2$  are  just  possible  [but  see  Note  4]. 

For  Sr  the  first  doublet  is  useless,  as  the  line  is  due  to  the  early  measurements  of 
LEHMANN,  which  are  affected  with  considerable  errors.  The  observed  separation  for 
Fn  and  FJ2  gives  10173  instead  of  something  less  than  100'34.  The  second  triplet 
gives  2 '92  for  the  separation  of  the  second  satellite  from  the  first  and  2 '06  for  the 
separation  of  the  satellite  of  the  second  line  of  the  triplet,  and  from  analogy  with 
other  satellite  series,  this  would  be  the  separation  of  the  first  and  second  satellites  of 
the  first  line.  Differences  of  3(5  and  2<5  give  separations  of  3'OG  and  2'04,  so  that  it 
may  be  concluded  that  the  satellites  depend  on  these  differences,  a  conclusion 
supported  by  the  fact  that  a  similar  result  is  indicated  as  possible  for  Ca. 

Returning  to  the  curious  fact  noticed  above  that  the  first  triplets  of  the  series 
seem  to  be  dislocated,  the  second  fragment  in  Sr  is  found  at  a  distance  143'68  below 
its  normal  position.  For  the  present  we  note  this  can  be  explained  by  one  of  two 
possible  collateral  displacements,  viz.  (-18^)  F  (2)  or  F(2)  (3A2),  where  F  stands  for 
the  normal  F2  or  F:).  The  case  of  Ba  below  will  give  evidence  in  favour  of  the  latter 
explanation. 

In  addition  to  the  lines  of  the  series  itself,  there  are  two  sets  of  triplets  and  a 
doublet  which  are  clearly  analogous  in  the  two  elements.  They  are  given  in  the  list 
above,  following  the  series  lines.  The  first  triplets  in  each  are  curious  as  having  the 
middle  line  the  strongest.*  They  are  also  related  to  others  in  the  way  indicated  in 
the  following  scheme  :— 

(8)  17847*46 
21-94 

Ca     (8)  17842'52     13'98     (8)  17856'50     12'90     (10)  17869*40 

13-86 

(8)  17883-26 
*  A  similar  peculiarity  has  already  been  noted  in  the  associated  OD  series. 


384 


DR.   W.    M.    HTCKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY  OF   SPECTRAL   SERIES. 


(6)  18061-87 
100-20 

Sr      (6)1804471      59'69     (8)  18104'40     57'67     (10)  18162'07 

56-61 

(8)  18218T>8 

(10)  18968-53 
21-57 
Ca     (8)  18985-31        4'79     (6)  18990'10        7'15        (6)  18997'25 

14-01 
(4)  19004'H 

(10)  19016-64 
100-34 

Sr    (10)19083-27      33'71      (8)  19116'98      15'25        (8)  19132'23     10'70     (8)19142-93 

59-75 

(4)  1917673 

The  first  lines  of  the  triplets  give  as  denominators,  supposing  the  true  limits  to 


1st  triplet 
2nd 


Ca. 

3'145123(22)-141-8£ 
3-317300  (30)-166'4f 

172177  +  30p-22g-24'6£ 


Sr. 

3-388848  (28)-177'4£ 
3-572008  (23)-207'8£ 


=  33 


=  126  (136878-  '20£)-5c5 


where  p,  q  lie  between  ±1.  Clearly  the  differences  are  the  multiples  126A2,  33A2, 
for  the  two  elements  respectively. 

The  first  lines  of  the  doublets  give  for  Ca  3*150824  (22)-  142"6£  and  for 
Sr  3-420693  (18)-182'5£ 

These  differ  from  the  denominator  of  Fn  (3)  by 


769567  +  123j9-22g-132'6^=  562  (l369'33  +  '22p--04g-    -236^) 

=    88 


Ca. 

Sr  . 


That  is,  they  apparently  differ  by  562A2,  88A2  respectively.  We  shall  see  shortly 
that  the  best  value  for  £  makes  the  relation  for  Sr  very  exact,  whilst  that  for  Ca  is 
more  doubtful. 


DK.    W.    M.    HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SI'KCTKAL  SKRIKS 


The  following  list  contains  the  wave  numbers  of  certain  lines  related  to  the  P  series 
in  the  two  elements  with  the  denominators  appended  for  the  chief  lines  :— 


Ca. 


a. 


-15380-80 
13-92 

-1539472 

-15447*35 

21-75 

A-15469'10 


1-571602-    177£ 


B-   5011 


•98] 


2-141121 

501474  j>22'71     2'141244-    447£ 
5034-69  j 

10-06 
504475 


C 


6171-18 
21-12 

6192'30 

D     13133-01 

20-04 

13153-05 

E     15580-59 

20'66 

15601-25 

VOL.  CCXIII.  -  A. 


2-194987-   48'2£ 


2-634565-   23'3£ 


2-865778-107-7^ 


-31237-30 

100-84 

-31338-14 

-31345-01 
68-93 

-31413-94 
99-99 

-31513-93 


3  n 


8894'66 


1527172 

99-09 

15370-81 


Sr. 


1-363986- 


1-361954- 


2-420625- 


2-981157 


386 


DR.    W.    M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY  OF   SPECTRAL   SERIES. 


Ca. 


Sr. 


G 


H 


17847-46 
21-94 

17869-40 
13-86 

17883-26 

17887-55 

21-81 

17909'34 

18968-53 
21-57 

18990-10 
14-01 

19004'H 


3-145123-141-8^ 


3-150824-142-6^ 


3-317300-  ? 


18061-89 

100-18 

18162-07 

56-61 

18218-68 

18239-35 

100-82 

18339-97 

19016-64 

100-34 

19116-98 

59-75 

19176-73 


3-388848-177-4^ 


3-420693-182-5^ 


3-572008-207 ' 


I 21022-14  4-048761 

59-91  or 

21082'OS  1-499227 

From  these  we  find  the  following  differences,  m  denoting  the  mantissa  only : — • 

Ca.  Sr.x 

a2—a1 3(5  within  limits 

mofF-mof«a '.     .  5  (5378'80-33'2£) 

mofD-wofA      ....        46(l36875-l'43f) 

mofG-mofB      ....          7(136871-14^)  68-118^=0 

m  of  Fi:!(3)-m  of  F    .     .     .      562  (l368'82-'236£)  88(5549'81-r02£) 

H-F 126(1366'48--20£)  33  (5550'30-'91£) 

126(l36878-'20£)-55 

D-C 32l(l369-40  +  -51d\--110£)* 

G-F13(2)t 158(1368'89--173^)  89  (5558'90-77f) 

G-F12(2)t 158(1368'16--173£)  89  (5552'66-77^) 

E-D 169(1368'12--144^) 

Also  the  first  triplet  A  in  Ca  shows  the  same  kind  of  dislocation  as  in  F  (2)  of  the 
other  elements.  The  dislocation  is  52'63,  corresponding  to  a  denominator  difference 
of  931,  and  163  is  930. 

*  dXon  13133  maybe  >1. 

t  FIS  (2)  as  calculated  from  the  formula. 

J  Allowing  28  for  the  satellite  difference  Fi2  -  F]3. 


DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  -; 

The  number  of  the  cases  where  multiples  of  A2  enter,  as  well  as  their  a]i|N>aranou  in 
the  corresponding  position  in  the  two  elements  where  corresponding  lines  are  olwerved 
must  produce  a  conviction  that  they  represent  real  and  not  chance  relations.  In  the 
case  of  Ca  it  makes  Aa  close  to  13687  corresponding  to  $  =  3617710*.  If  £  has  any 
but  a  very  small  value,  the  first  two  multiples  are  upset,  but  these  may  be  due  to 
chance.  If  £  be  made  — 6'5  as  suggested  below,  Aa  will  be  about  1370'2  with 
<£  =  362'15tt>3,  which  is  considerably  greater  than  the  most  probable  value.  The 
probability  is  that  £  can  only  be  a  small  ±  quantity,  £  =  ±  1  changing  J/if*  by  ±  '06. 
A  similar  reasoning  applied  to  Sr  rather  tends  to  show  that  here  the  value  —6 '5  is  to 
be  preferred.  It  makes  the  first  multiple  =  5x5594'60,  and  the  other  values  of  Aa 
become  5556'44,  56'21,  57'66,  and  5556  gives  $  =  (36 1 '52 ± "24) IP*,  the  uncertainty  of 
this  being  due  to  a  possible  error  in  the  atomic  weight  of  87'66,  with  £=  —  5'5  the 
first  relation  gives  A3  =  556T40. 

Again  the  most  probable  values  of  the  denominators  of  F13(2)  are 

Ca  =  934539*-115'2£  =  937277-115'2f-2A:i, 
Sr  =  925946t-H4'0£  =  937060 -114'0£- 2  A^ 

The  numbers  on  the  right  are  practically  equal.  If  analogous  relations  are  found  in 
Ba  and  Ka  it  points  to  the  existence  of  a  group  constant  alxmt  937300.  On  the 
other  hand  it  would  seem  that  the  denominators  of  VFU  (2)  are,  like  those  of 
VD13  (2)  multiples  of  A2  also,  for 

denominator  of  CaF,,(2)  =  934539  +  5<S  =  683  (136871-'16£), 
„    SrF,,(2)  =  925946  +  5,5  =  167  (55527<J-'68£),  . 

and  £  =  -6,  5  in  Sr  makes  A,,  =  5557'21  in  line  with  those  above. 

The  denominator  of  CaFn  (2)  is    8Aa  less  than  that  of  Cul)w  (2), 
„   SrFa(2)  ,,11A3     „       „       „      „  Sri)  (2). 

Which  of  these  two  interpretations  is  the  more  likely  must  l>e  left  until  the  cases  of 
Ba  and  Ka  are  considered.  It  should  however  be  noted  that  there  may  be  some 
uncertainty  as  to  what  lines  really  represent  Fu,  Fw,  or  F13,  i.e.,  as  to  which  of  them 
the  multiple  law  is  to  be  attached. 

There   remains   to    consider   the   question   of  the    real    limits. 

supposing  them  to  be  Dn,  D]S>  Du  are  so  strong  that  it  is  necessary  to  see  whether 
the  values  obtained  direct  from  the  F  series,  and  those  required  in  Table 
be  brought  into  agreement. 

If  the  F  series  possess  what  has  been  called  in  [II.]  a  formula  sequence,  t 
obtained  for  F(  °°)  above  cannot  be  more  than  a  few  units  in  error,  and  in  this  case 

*  Calculated  from  formula. 

t  The  observed  is  probably  Fls  (2)  since  the  separation  with  Fs(2)  is  the  f 

J5   D  2 


388  DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A   CEITICAL   STUDY  OF   SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

must  be  possible  to  raise  the  limits  for  D  (  oo )  to  agree  with  those  calculated  from 
F(oo).  That  is,  to  raise  that  for  Ca  from.  33981 '85  to  33989'85  and  for  Sr  from 
31027'25  to  31033*99,  or  Ca  by  8'00  and  Sr  by  674  or  thereabouts.  It  may  probably  be 
possible  to  find  numbers  near  those  which  would  still  make  the  order  differences  of 
Ca  and  Sr  multiples  of  S,  but  only  by  supposing  that  the  successive  mantissa- 
differences  in  the  D  series  after  rising  begin  to  decrease  with  higher  orders,  which  is 
against  the  rule  in  other  cases.  This  is  so  far  an  argument  against  this  way  of 
reconciling  the  different  values  of  the  limits.  If  however  the  order  differences  in  the 
F  series  behave  in  a  similar  manner  to  that  considered  above  for  the  D,  i.e.,  by 
multiples  of  $  or  A,  the  exactness  of  the  F  (oo)  found  by  means  of  a  formula  is  no 
longer  so  close,  and  the  question  becomes  one  of  seeing  if,  when  they  are  made  8  less 
for  Ca  and  674  for  Sr,  it  becomes  possible  to  arrange  the  denominators  in  the 
same  way. 

If  the  attempt  be  made  to  reduce  F  ( oo )  by  8  in  CaF,  a  similar  objection  to  that 
raised  above  will  enter,  viz.,  the  successive  mantissa-differences  after  falling  begin  to 
rise  after  m  =  5.  If  however  a  reduction  of  about  6 '5  be  made,  reducing  the  limit  to 
that  found  in  [II.]  for  S  ( oo ),  the  order  mantissse  differ  successively  within  observa- 
tion limits  by  10A2,  4A2,  A2,  A3,  0.  Further,  in  the  case  of  Sr  a  fall  of  675  produces 
a  similar  fall  and  rise  in  successive  denominators.  If  however  £  be  put  — 1'33, 
the  mantissas  differences  become  within  limits  3A2,  A2  +  9(5,  16<5,  11$,  4$.  If  this  is 
justified,  it  is  curious  that  as  in  the  D  series  where  there  are  no  satellites,  the 
differences  proceed  by  multiples  of  A2  the  same  rule  should  hold  for  CaF,  where 
satellites  are  at  least  not  certain.  The  difficulty  can  only  be  stated  and  the  solution 
left  open.  It  is  possible  that  the  order  differences  must  be  compared  from  the  Fj2  of 
one  line  to  the  Fu  of  the  next,  for  which  there  is  evidence  in  Ba  and  Ra. 

Barium. — In  discussing  Ba  we  start  under  the  disadvantage  that  the  lines 
belonging  to  D  (2),  with  the  corresponding  satellite  separations  have  not  been 
observed,  for  the  ultra-red  doublet  treated  in  the  discussion  on  the  D  series  does  not 
seem  to  belong  to  the  normal  D  (2).  Moreover,  the  observed  lines  which  are  clearly 
related  to  the  F  series  are  so  dispersed  by  collateral  displacements  that  it  is 
questionable  whether  it  is  possible  to  arrange  a  series  proceeding  by  an  algebraical 
sequence  as  in  the  other  cases.  The  lines  exhibited  in  the  table  above  run  on  parallel 
lines  with  the  corresponding  lines  in  Ca  and  Sr,  and  are  clearly  closely  related  to  the 
successive  orders  of  the  series,  even  if  they  are  not  the  typical  ones  themselves.  An 
attempt  to  obtain  a  formula  from  the  first  three  gives  a  limit  =  259067,  and  gives 
a  value  of  the  wave  number  for  m  =  5  of  22729'52  close  to  the  strong  line  22706'84. 
It  is  250'05  behind  the  strong  line  22979'57,  which  indicates  that  the  last  is  probably 
the  normal  F21(5),  and  makes  the  normal  Fn(5)  about  250  behind.  This  is  in  fail- 
order  with  the  march  of  the  others.  We  may  therefore  feel  justified  in  settling  that 
the  limit  of  F^oo)  js  near  259067.  The  F  separations  are  close  to  260  and  157, 
they  are  therefore  based  on  satellite  differences  in  the  D  series  of  15$  and  9<?;  S  is  so 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 


389 


large  that  there  can  be  no  doubt.  These  numbers  are  in  analogy  with  the  values 
for  Ca  and  Sr  viz  13*  and  M,  are  in  the  usual  ratio  5:3,  and  stand  to  the 
observed  values  for  BaD  (3)  given  in  Table  II.  in  a  similar  relation  to  those  in  Sr 


. 

,™     oT  }.  mU8t  ^        '3  (2)>  "^  lf  the  general  rale  found  above  that  ^e  mantissa 
of  VDU  (2)  is  a  multiple  of  A,  holds,  it  is  possible  to  obtain  a  very  accurate  value      As 

a  fact,  with  F,  (.)  =  25906  the  mantissa  of  F,(«)  »  very  nearly  the  multiple  of 
87  A,       fit  is  made  so  exactly,  taking  A,  =  11  960,  then  F,(«)  becomes  about  25922 
This  value,  with  the  D  satellite  differences  of  15*,  9*,  give 

F,(oo)  =  25922 

260-17 
F2  (  oo  )  =  26182-17 

157-95 
F3(oo)  =  26340-12 

and    it    is   seen    how    close   the   separations    come    to   those   observed.     If  we   put 
F,  (  co)  =•  25922  +  £  the  mantissa  of 

D13(2)  =  l-040539-387£=87(H960-2--45£)  =  87A,. 

The  D(2)  lines  calculated  from  these  and  D^oo)  =  28610"G3  found  above  give  the 
following  scheme  in  wave-lengths  on  ROWLAND'S  scale  in  vacuo  :  — 


D,. 

D,. 

D* 

44042'97 

31758'94 

2841675 

41178-36 

30241'91 

37193'67 

The  last  one  only  comes  within  the  region  in  which  RANDALL'S  ultra-red  lines  lie, 
his  longest  wave-length  being  29223,  belonging  to  the  doublet  treated  as  a  possible 
D  line  above.  If  the  rules  employed  are  valid,  these  values  can  only  err  by  a  few 
units.  The  denominator  of  VFn  (2)  is  2-923500-113'9f  In  the  cases  of  Ca  and 
Sr  there  is  apparent  the  existence  of  satellites,  viz.,  Fw(2)  =  F,,(2)  (  —  3*)  and 
Fi3(2)  =  Fn(2)(  —  5$),  and  in  both  cases  the  mantissa  of  one  of  the  F,  (2)  sets  thus 
found  are  multiples  of  A.?  If  this  is  general  the  mantissa  for  BaF,.,  (2)  will  be 
920085-113-9^.  This  is  77  (I1949'l-r48£),  sufficiently  near  to  give  some  weight 
to  the  allocation.  If  £  =  -10  this  is  77  x  1 1963*9  and  the  value  for  D13  given  above 
becomes  87  x  11 964 "7,  giving  a  value  of  A2  =  11964  within  limits  of  error  A,  =  11964 
makes  the  oun  683'66  =  3Gl'98^  with  W  =  137'43.  The  F  satellites  thus  constituted 
would,  if  existing,  have  separations  for  m  =  2  of  18 "02  and  12 "03,  and  for  m  =•  3  of 


390  DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

7  '63  and  5  '09  —  but  they  have  not  been  observed  for  F(2)  —  -as  indeed  is  the  case  in 
Ca  and  Sr  the  first  set  in  which  show  separations  of  the  full  amount.  The  curious 
dislocation  of  the  second  half  of  the  triplet  from  the  first  seen  in  Sr  shows  itself  here 
also.  The  analogue  appears  to  be  shown  in  the  triplet  coming  next  in  the  list  which 
appears  to  have  kept  its  first  member  and  satellite.  The  displacement  is  381'06±. 
This  cannot  be  due  to  a  displacement  in  F  (  oo  ),  for  if  so  the  separations  due  to 
15(5,  9$,  would  be  considerably  larger.  If  it  is  treated  as  a  displacement  on  VF  the 
denominator  difference  is  43403-5'3£  while  3A2+  lie?  =  43414.  It  is  probably 
therefore  this.  The  corresponding  displacement  in  Sr  was  found  to  be  3A2  The 
separation  between  the  first  line  and  the  satellite  is  575,  the  satellite  being  due  to 
LEHMANN  whose  measures  are  not  very  accurate,  it  may  well  be  6  '01  corresponding 
to  a  satellite  difference  of  S.  The  lines  may  therefore  be  represented 


FU(2)(3A2+11<$),         F21(2)(3A2+11<S),         Fm  (2)  (3A2 
Fn(2)(3A2 


If  the  next  two  lines  are  correctly  allocated,  18686  should  have  an  unobserved 
satellite  with  a  difference  2§.  This  would  make  18941  '97  or  F21  260'26  ahead 
of  the  satellite,  so  that  this  supports  the  allocation.  The  line  21308"19  =  Fn(4) 
corresponds  to  a  satellite  with  58.  This  makes,  on  the  supposition  of  satellite 
differences  of  2S,  BS,  2156070  or  F22  (4)  260'89  ahead  of  the  satellite  F13(4),  the 
satellite  F12  (4)  being  absent.  The  line  for  m  =  5  appears  to  be  displaced  to  22706. 
The  value  calculated  from  the  rough  formula  gives  a  line  250  behind  the  strong  line 
22979'57,  clearly  showing  that  the  latter  is  a  F2  (5)  line,  and  22706  is  very  close  to  a 
displacement  of  A2  on  the  calculated.  If  this  be  made  exact  the  undisplaced  line 
would  be  at  22719'97,  or  259'60  behind  22979'57.  This  is  within  error  limits  of  260'17. 
Hence  F13  (5)  has  been  altogether  displaced  to  22706'84  =  F18  (5)  (A2),  and  22979  '57 
is  F2(5).  For  m  =  6  the  formula  gives  Fx  (6)  =  23582'83.  There  is  a  doublet  at 
23667'07  ('28),  23919*27  (114)  with  a  separation  252'20,  and  no  others  in  the  neigh- 
bourhood. If  these  are  the  displaced  F  (6),  the  normal  F  (6)  would  be  23  59  5  '82  and 
23855-93  and  the  observed  lines  23667'07  =  Fx  (6)  (9A2)  and  23919'27  =  F2  (6)  (8Aa). 
The  calculated  normal  lines  have  separation  260'11,  or  practically  260'17.  A  line  at 
23995-83  is  413  =  260+153  ahead  of  the  calculated  F,  (6).  It  is  therefore  the 
undisplaced  F3  (6). 

There  are  a  large  number  of  other  lines  clearly  related  to  the  F  type.  Their 
complete  discussion  would  require  a  more  searching  investigation  than  can  be  given 
now.  Several  sets  are  related  in  a  manner  which  is  quite  common  in  spark  and  rich 
arc  spectra,  indicated  by  the  fact  that  a  number  of  lines  may  differ  in  succession  by 
nearly  the  same  separation  —  a  kind  of  relation  which  cannot  be  due  to  collateral 
displacement  by  equal  denominator  differences.  There  are  a  few  also  which  seem  to 
be  attached  parasitically  to  S  and  D  lines.  There  may  be  uncertainty  also  as  to 


DR.   W.    M.  HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPFXTTRAL  SKRIKS. 


whether  the  separations  shown  which  differ  from  2GO  and  158,  differ  through  a 
satellite  effect,  or  by  successive  collaterals  of  15$  and  9cJ.  For  instance,  putting 

158  =  A',         F1(oo)-F1(oo)(A')  =  264>10,        F,(oo)  (-A')  -F,(o>)  =  256'39, 
Fa(oo)(-2A')  -Fa(oo)(_A')  =  252-35, 

all  which  separations  occur.  In  the  lines  now  to  be  referred  to,  however,  the 
separations  will  he  supposed  to  owe  their  defect  from  260  to  the  satellite  effect,  and 
thus  treated  it  is  clearly  seen  what  an  important  r61e  the  Aa  term  plays. 

Amongst  the  ultra-red  lines  observed  by  RANDALL*  appear  the  following  in  wave 

numbers  :— 

(70)  9387-55  (4'4) 


(60)9547'08(l-82) 


1.  <!  (60)  9771-54  (-95) 


(5)9804787(1-5). 
.  (60)  9964*527  (3) 


159-93 


257-70 


159-76 


The  figures  in  brackets  before  the  numbers  give  intensities  and  those  after  the 
estimated  maximum  errors.  They  clearly  l>elong  to  the  F  cycle,  and  show  within 
error  limits  the  normal  separations.  The  run  of  the  intensities  would  point  to 
negative  values,  with  the  first  four  respectively  for  /31,  /„,  /„,  /,„  but  also  the  2nd, 
4th  and  5th  might  be  fl}f3,f3,  whereby  9771  would  not  come  in  and  the  small 
intensity  for  fa  would  be  abnormal.  On  the  first  supposition,  /„  =  -9771  gives  a 
denominator  1752908  (23)-24'5£  '  and  /„  =  -9804  =/„  (-3).  On  the  second, 
/„  =  9547  gives  a  denominator  2'588000  (143)  -79f  Now 

or  denominator  of /12  =  63  (ll96ri±-36--36£)  -2S  =  63Aa-2A 

In  the  following  the  wave  numbers  of  some  sets  of  lines  with  their  separations  are 
given.  The  low  frequencies  have  been  observed  by  LEHMANN  and  by  HERMANN  and 
HOELLER.  LEHMANN  gives  many  weaker  ones  not  observed  by  HERMANN  and  vice 
versd.  LEHMANN'S  observations  were  earlier  but  are  not  nearly  so  accurate  as  those 

of  the  others. 

260-17  12896-53 

260-94  14402-09     158'63     1456072 

254-37  15157-63     157-88     15315'51 


2.  12636-36 

3.  14141-15 

4.  14903'26 
14934'33 


5. 


16669-61  259-69 


16921-93 
16929-30 


156-03  17077-96 


'Ann.  d.  Phys.,'  33,  p.  745(1910). 


392 


DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY   OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 


G.    17219'30     262-78     17482'08 


7.  17508-93 

8.  18577'96 


261-16 
258-12 


17770'09 
18836-08 


144-15     18980'23? 


9.   18585-56     255'92     18841'48 

10.  18632-62     261-69     18894'31 

11.  23667*07     252-20     23919'27 

The  following  numbers  give  the  corresponding  denominators  calculated  from 
Fj  ( oo  )  =  25922.  Where  the  separation  differs  from  260,  the  satellite  value — or, 
which  is  the  same  thing,  the  denominator  for  F21 — is  inserted  as  well,  but,  in  order  to 
distinguish  it,  it  is  printed  further  to  the  right — the  changes  due  to  £  being  the  same 
for  both. 


(2)     2-873178-108-1^" 
Fn(2)     2-923500-113-9^ 
F'12(2)     2-967999-119-2^ 

8+3 

F'u(2)     2-968684-119'2£_J 
-3-051164-129-5^" 
•051267 
•154087 


(4) 


3'154916-143'1£ 


3'159373-1437f. 
'441229 


(5)-j         -441583 

2S+5 

L3-442954-186'0^ 
3-549987-203-9^ 

(•)-] 

•550517  _ 

3-610577-214-5^ 
(7)<j  Sx+43 

•610791 


95506  =  8(11938-3-1-39^) 


83165^    = 


108209J    =9(12023-2-1-58^) 


11952 


11895(11969) 


12039(11982) 


28667  =  24(11944-6-176^) 


11962 


•107563  =  9(119517-1-99^) 


60060  =  5(12012-2-08^) 


11971-6 


11964-6 


11932 


11962 


DR.    W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OP  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 
("        '863911 
(8H  28,+H 

[.3-864437-263^    ' 
f        '865855 
L3'866436-263^ 
-3-878900-266-1^ 

'879299 

Fla(3)  '892050 

Fn(3)     3-893395-269-0^" 
F12(4)  -871538 

Fn(4)     4-875553-528-3^" 
FIS(5)(-Aa)     5-840534-908-3^ 

A.-8-14 

F12(5)     5-851797-908-3^ 
?Fn(5)  '852480 

f        '961761 

(ioH  A, 

[6'974086(432)-1546'4£ 

The  differences  are  given  in  thick  figures.  The  last  column  gives  the  corresponding 
value  of  A2  without  regard  to  observation  errors  when  £  =  -10.  In  the  case  of  (3) 
if  the  differences  be  referred  to  a  hypothetical  F,,,  displaced  3<?  from  14141,  the  two 
abnormal  values  come  to  11969  and  11982.  It  will  l>e  remembered  that  we  had  an 
indication,  above  of  £  =  -10  with  A2  =  11964  in  treating  both  VI),,  (2)  and  VF13(2) 
as  depending  on  multiples  of  Aa.  It  would  seem,  therefore,  that  the  value  of  Aa  is 
close  to  1196413  and  the  value  of  F,(o>)  =  25912. 

The  actual  differences  of  successive  denominators  in  the  normal  series  may  thus  lie 
represented  :— 


14463  =  11929  + 15J,-28-3-l£ 

14495  =  11933  +  15^-2-9^ 

•978143  =  82  (11928-5-3-16^)  11970 

—  968996  =  81  (l  1 962  "9 15  '93  —  4  "6.3£) 

964981  =  81(11913-3+         -4'63£)     11959'6 
976927  =  82(119137-  4'63£)      11960 


F,i(2),     F13(3)  =  8l(ll957-4-l'91£)  =  81 
Fu(3),     F,8(4)  =  82(11928-5-3-16^)  = 
Fn(4),     Fn  (5)  =  82(ll9137±3'6-4-63^) 


119597,' 
,     11960-1, 
,     11960-013-6, 


in  which  the  last  column  also  gives  the  value  of  A2,  where  £  =  —10. 

The  first  multiple  of  81  with  addition  of  2$  suggests  (l)  a  real  F,,(2),  displaced  li<5 
from  13089,  or  (2)  that  there  is  a  normal  type  Fu  about  A2  behind.  The  latter  may 
well  not  l>e  a  typical  Fu  line  since  it  makes  the  exact  separation  260  with  F^.  There 

VOL.  ccxin.  —  A.  3  E 


394  DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL   STUDY  OF   SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

is  a  line  by  LEHMANN  at  13096'55,  but  its  collateral  displacement  cannot  be  2<?  within 
any  likely  limits  of  even  LEHM ANN'S  measurements.  As  to  the  second  supposition, 
there  is  a  line  at  n  =  12992'53  by  LEHMANN  which  gives  denominator  2'892050. 
This  gives  a  difference  with  F12(3)  of  82  (11943>5-1'90^),  which  with  £=  -10 
would  again  make  A2  =  11962'5.  It  would  thus  appear  that  the  normal  Fn  (2) 
line  is  12992,  and  the  system  receives  a  double  displacement,  first  to  13089,  and 
again  to  13471.  The  mantissa  is  912483-112'6£  The  addition  of  2A2  makes  it 
936403  — 112'6£  which  with  £  =  —10  is  937529,  well  within  error  limits  of  the  same 
quantity  in  the  case  of  Ca  and  Sr.  Again  we  are  met  with  the  apparent 
simultaneous  existence  of  two  explanations  which  cannot  be  compatible.  Is  the  true 
explanation  that  the  typical  first  line  is  937300  — 2A2,  but  that  the  corresponding 
configuration  is  not  very  stable  and  transforms  to  one  depending  on  the  nearest 
complete  multiple  of  A2.  Certainly  such  instability  is  indicated  in  Ba. 

Radium. — -The  discussion  for  radium  is  rendered  even  more  uncertain  than  that 
for  barium,  in  that  the  ultra-red  region  has  not  been  observed,  the  process  of 
disintegration  and  re-aggregation  has  proceeded  further,  and,  in  addition,  there  is 
some  uncertainty  about  A2  =  S7S2  adopted. 

RUNGE  and  PRECHT'S  plates  were  only  sensitive  up  to  6500  A.U.,  and  EXNER  and 
HASHEK  give  only  two  lines  above  this,  664273  and  6641 '38,  both  of  which  belong 
to  the  F  cycle.  The  number  of  lines,  however,  coming  within  this  cycle  is  very  large, 
but  a  complete  discussion  would  involve  the  consideration  of  the  new  kinds  of 
relationships  referred  to  under  barium,  and  cannot  therefore  be  undertaken  here.  It 
will  be  sufficient  to  deal  only  with  some  generalities,  specially  bearing  on  the  series 
proper,  which  will  also  give  some  further  light  on  the  general  D  series. 

There  are  a  large  number  of  triplets  with 'separations  in  the  neighbourhood  of  692 
and  432,  which  are  roughly  in  the  proper  ratio  5  :  3,  allowing  for  the  fact  that  the 
actual  separations  must  be  larger.  Those  in  the  table  of  F  lines  above  are  roughly 
parallel  to  the  BaF,  and  give  a  limit  somewhere  about  24520.  VDn  (2)  would 
therefore  be  about  this,  and  VD13(2)  more  than  692  +  432  =  1124  larger.  The 
denominator  of  VD13(2)  should  be  a  multiple  of  A2.  Using  the  most  probable  value 
of  A2  =  374,  it  is  found  that  the  denominator  comes  out  very  close  to  a  multiple  of 
31A2.  If  this  be  made  exact  it  is  found  that  VD13(2)  =  F3(oo)  =  2575275.  The 
value  of  F3(oo)  is  then  taken  25752 7 5  + £  The  values  of  S  are  so  large  that  there 
can  be  no  ambiguity  about  the  multiples  to  be  chosen  to  give  the  separations,  viz., 
16(5,  1QS.  These  multiples  march  well  with  those  for  Ca,  Sr,  Ba.  The  separations 
resulting  are  705'93,  456'69,  with  F^oo)  =  24590'! 3  and  F2(oo)  =  25296'06.  If  we 
apply  the  rule  shown  in  the  preceding  elements  for  F13(2),  the  denominator  is 
2'937300-2A2  =  2'868676.  Satellites  depending  on  38,  28  would  give  separations 
51  '44  and  34 '20,  and  the  fact  that  these  separations  occur  in  connection  with 
n  =  17300  renders  the  identification  of  that  for  F(3)  rather  doubtful,  a  doubt  which 
is  increased  when  we  test  the  allocation  by  the  law  indicated  above  that  the 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  395 

differences  of  the  denominators  of  Fn(m)-F»(m+l)  is  always  the  same  multiple  of 
A2,  as  ,s  done  below.  The  line  19897  has  separation  689-33,  and  therefore  should 
have  a  satellite  (too  faint)  16"60  above  it.  Allowing  for  observational  errors  on 
197  this  is  5*  on  the  denominator.  The  following  scheme  will  then  illuHtrate  the 
law  of  formation  : — 


Calculated  F13(2)    2'868676  


Satellite 

17165-94 
17236T.8 

17300-80 
Satellite 

19897-05 
21350-92 


3-837028 

3^8 

3*843521  -258'8£ 
S'861964-262-6^ 

98 
3'878913-266M£ 

4*825655 
4' 8 30 49 2 
28 
4-834202-515^ 

5'818813-898'2£_ 


-993288  =  29(34251  ±14-9-05^),  34296±  14 


993464  =  29  (34257 -4- 8 -8£),        34301 


—  993158  =  29(34246'8-13-2£),      34312 


In  the  above  the  first  is  the  denominator  calculated  from  937300-2Aa.  It  is 
affected  with  an  uncertainty  of  about  400  on  the  937300.  The  line  n  =  17165'94 
has  a  separation  680'84  with  1784678,  and  therefore  should  have  a  satellite  25'09 
above  it.  Its  denominator  difference  is  6493  behind  and  3£<?  =  6492.  The  line 
17236 '68  is  associated  with  17300.  Its  denominator  is  16949  behind  that  of  17300 
and  9<5  =  16695— the  same  within  limits.  The  satellite  of  19897  is  displaced  4$<J. 
There  is  no  evidence  of  a  satellite  2S  behind  it,  but  the  difference  of  29Aa  is  made 
with  this  suppositions  one.  It  is  seen  that  a  value  of  £  about  —5  makes  these  the 
same  within  limits.  The  corresponding  values  of  Aa  are  appended  in  the  last  column. 
It  may  be  taken  that  the  discussion  has  established,  that  the  satellite  differences 
in  the  lines  EaD(2)  are  16(5  and  IOS.  This  is  the  only  result  of  which  there  can  be 
certainty. 

The  Zn  Sub-group. — Using  the  limits  given  in  Table  II.  above  and  the  corresponding 
values  of  Dl  (2),  the  limits  F,  (  » )  =  D  ( oo )— Dn  (2)  come  as  follows  : — 


Zn 
Cd 
Hg 


12988*37,  with  separations    4'88,    374. 
13022-83  18-23,  1T10. 


12753-07 


34'68,  62-04. 


3  E  2 


396  DR.   W.    M.    HICKS:    A  CRITICAL   STUDY  OF   SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

PASCHEN  allots  the  following  for  Zn  and  Cd,  viz.,  in  wave  numbers  :— 


6059-50 


6065'51 


ZnF(3)     6062-55 


3'05 


2-43 


6064-98 


CdF(3)     6083-37 

6095-35 

CdF3(4)     8595-57 


17-86 


11-98 


The  line  8595  must  be  allotted  to  F3  because  it  makes  the  difference  266  with 
8872,  so  that  the  two  are  F  lines  connected  with  DJ3(2)  and  iiie  companion  to  the  D13 
line  267  above  it.  This  relation  has  already  been  discussed  under  the  D  series  above. 
For  Hg  he  assigns  5814  to  Fj  (3),  5843  to  F2(3),  5908'68  to  F4(3),  8316'40  to  F,  (4), 
8409'85  to  F3(4).  Now  5843  is  double  with  dn  =4"8,  corresponding  to  a  displace- 
ment S,  and  may  well  be  F21 .  F22,  whilst  5908  is  F3(3).  Again,  8316'40  and  8409'85 
are  separated  by  93"45,  which  is  so  close  to  34'68  +  62'04  as  to  indicate  that  they  are 
Fj  (4)  and  F3(4)  and  that  F2(4)  has  not  been  observed. 

With  these  allocations  VF(3)*  =  6939'07  and  VF(4)  =  4436'66  and  the  denomi- 
nators for  the  lines  calculated  from  the  first  lines  (except  CdF3  (4))  are 


Zn. 

3'978529-287'lf 


Cd. 

3'970387-285'3^ 

4-960809-556'4^ 


Hg. 

3'975605-286'5^ 

4-971938-560-3^ 


The  differences  of  the  mantissae  of  the  two  orders  in  Cd  and  Hg  are 


Cd. 
9578  +  271£     213  =  9561 ; 


Hg. 


3667  +  274£ 


=  3629; 


in  which  the  probable  variations  of  £  are  small  fractions.  In  fact,  the  greatest 
uncertainties  are  due  to  observation  errors. 

There  is  not  much  material  to  throw  light  on  the  origin  of  the  F  term  here,  nor  in 
fact  is  there  evidence  that  the  fundamental  lines,  or  the  first  lines,  of  the  series  are 

*  On  the  basis  of  RITZ'S  combining  theory  PASCHEN  gives  the  following  allocations  (lines  in  wave- 
lengths) : — 

3011-17  =  S1(oo)  -VF  (3)  2799-76  =  Si  (oc)-VF  (4) 

2642-70  =  S2(oo)-VF(3)  2478-09  =  S2  ( a,)  -  VF  (4) 

2524-80  =  S3  (  00)  -  VF  (3)  2374-11  =  S3(oo)-VF(4) 

There  can  be  little  doubt  about  the  correctness  of  this  allocation.  Using  the  value  of  Si  ( oo)  in  [II.] 
40139-55  and  the  wave  numbers  -33200-19,  35707-02  of  the  first  lines  of  each  set  there  results 
VF  (3)  =  6939-36,  4432-53,  which  are  practically  the  same  as  those  found  direct. 


DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SKRIffi.  397 

for  m  =  3.  Any  lines -corresponding  to  m  =  2  would  have  wave  numbers  about  500, 
and  to  m  =  1  negative  wave  numbers  m  the  neighbourhood  of  16000.  Now  PASCHKN 
has  noted  lines  which  may  be  treated  as  the  actual  lines  in  question.  They  depend 
on  terms  S'  (  °° )-  VD  (2)  where  S'  (  » )  is  the  limit  of  his  singlet  series,  and  of  course 
VD(2)  is  the  F(oo)  of  the  above.  Using  sequences  for  the  8' series  of  the  form 
ft.  =  1  +f,  the  limits  of  the  series  are 


Zn.  Cd. 

29019-96  28843'40 

The  lines  in  question  are 

Zn.  Cd. 

A  =  0238-21  G325'40 

n  =  10025*87  15804'98 


Hg. 
30114-33 

Hg. 

5769-45 
17327-96 


If  these  wave  numbers  be  added  to  Fa(oo)  m  each  element,  there  results  29018'62, 
28846-14  and  30115-71,  i.e.,  the  value  of  the  S'  ( oo)  above.  The  corresponding  lines  for 
F!  (  co )  do  not  seem  to  exist.  There  is  no  d  priori  reason  to  take  F,(  oo )  rather  than 
Fj  ( co )  for  Zn.  In  Cd,  however,  the  case  is  settled  in  favour  of  F2,  as  the  other  lines 
exist,  viz.,  -15520'84,  -15793'05,  -15804'98,  giving  the  differences  266'21,  1T93 
corresponding  therefore  to  the  companion  series  to  D13(2),  to  D13(2)  and  Dla(2),  D,, 
not  appearing.  But  in  Hg  -17327'9G,  -17264'98,  -17223'97,  with  differences 
62 "98,  41  "01  would  seem  to  assign  17327  to  the  F3  term.  Nevertheless  to  get  the 
limit  of  PASCHEN'S  S'  series  it  is  necessary  to  take  Fa  ( oo ). 

If  these  be  regarded  as  the  first  lines  of  the  F  series,  the  denominators  are 
Zn,  1-943072-33-5^;  Cd,  l-949840-33'9^;  Hg,  T908346.  In  Hg  the  line 
n  =  —17121  '30  would  seem  to  stand  in  a  normal  relation  to  the  F,,  as  it  comes  into 
line  with  the  others  as  is  seen  below.  With  this  the  apparent  limit  with  F,  would 
be  29874*37,  giving  denominator  1  "916040  —  32"0£  The  question  now  is,  are  these 
denominators  related  in  any  way  to  those  for  m  =  3.  The  differences  of  their 
mantissas  are,  using  our  new  Hg  line 


Zn. 

34557-254£ 
10(34557-25-4^) 
=  10A2 


Cd. 

20547-252£ 
2(10273-126$ 


Hg. 

59565-254*5^ 

2(29782-127-2^) 

2A, 


well  within  errors,  it  being  also  remembered  that  £  can  only  be  a  fraction.  The  value 
of  A2  for  Hg  adopted  is  the  corrected  one  29765,  from  $=  36r85w*.  This  is  a 
striking  connection.  It  shows  that  the  limits  for  PASCHEN'S  singlet  series  are  either 
VF(1)  or  are  formed  from  VF(3)  by  deducting  10A3  for  Zn,  2A,  for  Cd,  and 
apparently  2A2  for  a  normal  type  in  Hg  which  then  receives  some  displacement. 


31)8  I>i;.    W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CEITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

Magnesium. — We  are  now  in  a  better  position  to  take  up  the  consideration  of  the 
place  Mg  is  to  occupy  in  the  second  group  of  elements,  viz.,  whether  it  is  allied  with 
the  Ca  or  the  Zn  sub-groups.  In  the  discussion  of  MgD  (p.  356)  there  was  evidence 
in  favour  of  either  view.  If  it  belongs  to  the  former,  then  the  line  X  =  14877  is 
D^l);  if  to  the  latter  we  have  PASCHEN'S  allocations  of  14877  to  F(3)  and  10812'9 
to  F  (4).  Take  first  the  supposition  that  Mg  is  analogous  to  the  earths.  In  this  case 
F(»)  =  39751-08-6719-95  =  33031*15,  6719  being  the  wave  number  of  14877.  If 
the  F  series  is  formed  on  the  type  of  the  Ca  set  the  denominator  of  the  first  line  will 
be  2*937300-2A2  =  2'936474.  This  gives  a  line  n  =  20312.  No  line  has  been 
observed  sufficiently  near  to  this  to  be  identified  with  it.  In  the  other  case 
F(oo)  =  D,(2)  =  39751*08  -  2604'4*99  =  13706'09.  PASCHEN'S  allocations  then 
give  denominators  3*962183-283*5£  4*958710-5557£  with  a  mantissa-difference 
=  3473  +  272£  With  £  =  '9  this  is  3717  or  9A2.  The  value  £  =  '9  will  upset  the 
difference  in  Table  II.  between  D  (2)  and  the  supposed  D  (l)  which  in  this  case  does 
not  exist.  It  still  leaves  the  difference  between  the  denominators  of  D  (2)  and 
D  (3)  =  6A2.  If  Mg  is  completely  analogous  with  the  Zn  set  the  combination  lines 
S(oo)-VF(3),  S(oo)_VF(4)  should  exist.  They  should  be  at  n  =  32764'92  ('67), 
+  !/!,  +v2,  and  3529072  ("87),  +»i,  +v.2.  Now  EDEB  and  VALENTA  give  two  spark 
lines  of  weak  intensity  at  3050*75,  3046'80,  and  SAUNDEBS  a  weak  arc  at  3051. 
The  wave  numbers  in  vacuo  are  32769*48  and  32811*95  separated  by  42*47,  which 
is  clearly  Vl  =  40"90.  These  are  therefore  the  looked  for  81(  oo)-VF  (3),  and 
S2  ( °° ) -  VF  (3),  the  third  S3  (  oo ) - VF  (3)  not  having  been  seen.  As  to  the  other  set, 
SAUNDERS  has  observed  a  line  at  2833  giving  n  =  3528819  which  is  clearly 
Sj  (  co)  — VF(4).  The  existence  of  these  combination  lines  seems  to  settle  the  question 
in  favour  of  Mg  belonging  spectroscopically  to  the  Zn  group  of  metals  rather  than 
the  alkaline  earths.  It  is  possible  that  as  a  transition  element  it  belongs  to  both 
types.  Judging  from  PASCHEN'S  various  readings  it  might  well  be  that  X  =  14877  is 
double  so  that  one  might  be  D  (l)  and  the  other  F(3). 

Group  III. — In  Al  and  Tl  alone  have  the  ultra-red  lines  been  observed,  and 
here  the  F  lines  are  found  in  a  similar  position  to  those  in  the  Zn  groups,  and  with 
them  EITZ'S  combinations  S(oo)— VF(3)  and  S(o°)-VP(3).  Using  the  values  of 
D(co)  of  [II]  the  values  of  F(oo)  =  VD  (2)  are  15837*92  for  Al  and  13064*21 
with  separation  81*98  (*24)  for  F2(oo)  for  Tl.  For  Aluminium  PASCHEN  gives 
n  =  8882*19  (*80)  and  11392*8(3*90)  for  F(3)  and  F(4),  from  which  result 
VF  (3)  =  6955*73  (*80)  and  VF  (4)  =  4445*12  (3*90).  The  combination 

--  41204*14  (3*39)  =  S,  (  oo )-VF  (3)  gives  VF  (3)  =  6957*32  (3*39). 

For  Thalium  PASCHEN  gives  n  =  6118*19  (75),  6200*67(77)  for  F,  (3),  F2  (3)  and 
8622*47  (*37),  8706*78  (l*5l)  for  F1(4),  F3(4).  These  give  separations  82*48 ±75 ±77, 
and  84*31±*37±1*51  instead  of  8 1*9 8 ±'24,  but  the  same  within  limits.  He  also 
gives  n  =  34526*21  (179),  42321*40(2*69)  for  S(oo)-VF(8)  and  37022*23(6*85)  for 


PR   W.    M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

S,  (o°)  —  VF(4).  The  possible  errors  of  the  latter,  however,  are  so  large  that  they 
cannot  be  used  to  improve  the  values  found  from  the  direct  lines.  The  limit 
calculated  from  D(  oo)  of  [II.]  and  D,,  (2)  is  18064-21,  but  there  is  some  uncertainty 
owing  to  the  abnormality  of  D(2)  as  explained  above  under  the  dinrassinn  of  the 
D  series.  The  lines  Ft  (3)  and  F,  (4)  give  6946*02  (73)  for  VF(3)  and  444174  ('37) 
for  VF  (4). 

In  the  case  of  In  no  ultra-red  lines  have  been  observed.  In  K.R.'s  list  there 
appears  a  doublet  X  =  2720"10,  2565"59,  which  shows  a  separation  2213"32,  the  true 
doublet  separation  being  about  2212'38.  Its  relative  position  in  tin-  s|»-.-tiuin 
compared  with  that  of  Al  and  Tl  point  it  out  as  the  Ititz  combination  S(  oo)— VP,  (3). 
K.R.  also  give  a  line  at  X  =  2666'33  or  n  =  3749377 (2'8l),  which  from  its  pnsitim, 
might  be  S,(oo)-VF(3).  If  so,  the  value  of  VF(3)  is  6960-99  (2'80)  and  clearly 
in  line  with  those  of  Al  and  Tl.  We  shall  adopt  it  provisionally.  K.R.  mark  all 
these  lines  as  doubtful,  but  the  existence  of  the  doublet  separation  points  to  their 
real  existence-  as  In  lines.  Collecting  these  give  the  following  :— 

Al.  In.  Tl. 

VF(3)   .  .     G95573  +  '80p  +  £  6960'99  +  2-80p  +  £ 

Denom.  .  .     3'970842-228jJ-285£       3'969340-801p-285£ 
VF(4)    .  .     4445-12  +  3'90g  +  f  444174  + ' 

Denom...     4'967208-2177?-558£  4'969095-207qr-559£ 

It  is  seen  that  Al  and  In  may  be  the  same  within  limits.  In  Tl  the  uncertainty  in 
D  (2)  referred  to  above  is  such  as  to  raise  the  limit — and  by  19 '19 — if  the  explanation 
there  given  is  correct.  A  rise  of  10  would  make  the  denominator  for  m  =:  3  the 
same  as  for  Al  and  In. 

One  of  the  most  striking  results  of  this  discussion  of  the  F  series  is  the  distinct 
divergence  in  type  between  the  spectra  of  the  high  melting-point  elements  and  those 
of  the  low  melting  point,  and  at  the  same  time  the  close  resemblance  between  the 
individual  elements  in  each  division.  So  close  indeed  is  the  resemblance  l*;tween  all 
the  low  melting-point  elements  of  Groups  II.  and  III.  that  the  differences  between 
them  appear  to  be  almost  wholly  due  to  the  difference  of  the  limits,  or  the  value  of 
VD  (2)  and  the  values  of  VF  (3)  are  almost  the  same.  To  see  how  closely  they  agree 
the  denominators  to  four  places  of  decimals  are  collected  here,  and  for  comparison 
those  of  the  alkalies. 


Mg  3-9621, 
Al    3'9708, 
Na  3-9979, 

Zn  S'9785, 
Ga       ?      , 
K   3-9928, 

Cd  3-9703, 
In    3'9693, 
Rb  3-9878, 

Eu       ?      , 
? 

Ca  3-9773, 

Hg  3-9756, 
Tl    3'9736, 

It  is  seen  how  closely  the  elements  in  each  group  agree  in  spite  of  a  very  wi 
difference  in  atomic  weight,  and  moreover  the  mantisase  in  all  are  very  close 


400  DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

It  was  shown  in  [I.]  that  the  F  series  of  the  alkalies  could  be  represented  by  a  series 
of  the  form  m+l—  a(l  —  1/m).  The  same  is  the  case  with  the  Al  and  Zn  groups. 
As  a  is  so  small  and  varies  so  little  it  can  scarcely  be  a  function  of  the  atomic  weight. 
The  atomic  volumes  of  the  elements  are  much  more  even  and  it  may  be  a  function  of 
them  as  is  the  case  with  the  p-sequence.  In  fact,  in  the  case  of  the  alkalies,  the  a 
are  not  far  from  being  proportional  to  v,  2v,  2v,  3v,  for  the  four  elements  considered, 
but  the  data  are  so  inexact  and  uncertain  that  it  seems  not  worth  while  to  undertake 
an  exhaustive  numerical  discussion. 

We  do  not  know  that  the  chief  lines  of  these  sets  are  those  depending  on  m  =  3. 
If  lines  exist  depending  on  m  =  2  they  would  all  be  in  extremest  reel,  in  fact  with 
wave-lengths  comparable  with  those  of  electro-magnetic  waves  capable  of  being 
experimentally  excited,  and  it  is  possible  that  VF(2)  might  be  the  same  for  all  low 
melting-point  elements  and  as  for  He  (see  [I.]).  For  m  =  1  we  should  expect  the 
lines  of  negative  wave  number  in  regions  which  have  been  observed  and  in  which  no 
such  lines  have  been  seen. 

The  F  series  in  the  high  melting-point  elements,  on  the  contrary,  are  profoundly 
influenced  by  the  atomic  weight  term.  Either  the  lines  observed  belong  to  a  different 
type  from  those  of  the  others,  or  they  are  based  on  a  normal  type  of  aggregation 
which  is  modified  by  collateral  and  other  types  of  displacement  due  to  the  splitting 
up  of  the  typical  aggregations,  or  to  a  more  complex  system  of  new  aggregations. 

The  notation  F  for  these  series  was  adopted  in  [I.]  under  the  idea  that  the 
sequence  for  it  was  of  a  more  fundamental  nature  than  the  others,  and  that 
impression  is  rather  strengthened  by  the  present  discussion.  It  has  been  seen,  for 
instance,  how  the  limits  of  PASCHEN'S  singlet  S'  series  in  the  Zn  group  depend  on  it. 
It  would  be  interesting  to  know  whether  similar  series  appear  in  the  alkalies  and 
aluminium  group. 

The  Value  of  the  Chin. 

The  further  knowledge  now  gained  as  to  ways  in  which  the  oun — or  the  A — enters 
in  the  constitution  of  spectra,  enables  a  much  closer  approximation  to  its  actual  value 
to  be  obtained  than  was  possible  from  the  consideration  of  the  doublet  and  triplet 
separations  themselves.  Amongst  the  principal  aids  are  (l)  the  separations  themselves, 
(2)  the  dependence  of  the  first  D  denominator  on  a  multiple  of  A,  (3)  in  the  triplet 
elements,  on  the  collateral  relations  between  associated  lines,  (4)  the  satellite 
separations  in  the  D  series,  (5)  the  order  separations  in  the  D  series  which  show 
no  satellites,  (6)  collaterals  depending  on  A.  Of  these,  Nos.  (l)  and  (4)  have  the 
great  advantage  that  the  values  depend  only  slightly  on  the  exactness  of  the  limit 
(the  value  of  £),  but  (4)  has  the  disadvantage  that  only  small  multiples  of  S  are 
involved,  and  (l)  only  A  itself.  There  are  also  various  uncertainties  which  show 
themselves  when  a  high  order  of  accuracy  is  desired — chiefly  in  the  elements  of  the 
3rd  group.  No.  (2)  has  the  great  advantage  of  giving  considerable  multiples  of  A, 


DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  401 

but  they  depend  to  a  larger  extent  than  (l)  and  (4)  on  the  exactness  of  the  limit. 
This  inexactness  is,  however,  in  general  more  than  compensated  by  the  largeness  of 
the  quantities  dealt  with.  Collateral  relations  also  are  capable  of  giving  very  exact 
values,  but  always  subject  to  uncertainty  as  to  the  actuality  of  the  relations  indicated 
by  the  numerical  coincidences.  This  is  less  apparent  in  the  F  series  of  tlir  high 
melting-point  elements  in  Group  III.,  where  the  relations  are  largely  «M.-ililishr<l  by 
analogy  between  the  different  elements  involved.  No.  (5)  is  affected  by  the  exactness 
of  the  limit,  and  is  only  useful  when  the  separation  is  taken  between  the  first  two 
orders  and  it  is  a  considerable  multiple  of  A,  as,  for  instance,  117A  in  Al. 

For  the  special  purpose  of  obtaining  as  exact  a  value  as  possible  of  the  ratio  A/ir3  it 
will  be  better  to  exclude  from  consideration  Na,  Ga,  He,  Sc,  0,  S,  and  Se.  Na  is 
excluded  on  account  of  the  uncertainty  as  to  whether  F.  and  P.'s  interferometer 
measures  of  the  P  (2)  lines  are  to  be  taken  as  giving  the  value  of  v  for  the  S  and 
D  series,  in  which  a  somewhat  larger  value  is  indicated  by  observers  using  ordinary 
methods.  Ga  is  omitted  on  account  of  its  poor  spectroscopic  data.  He  because  its  v, 
although  very  accurately  determined,  is  so  small  that  slight  errors  are  very  large 
proportionate  ones.  0  because  v  is  small  and  the  observations  not  so  exact,  and 
Sc,  S,  and  Se  because  their  spectra  have  not  been  sufficiently  discussed.  There 
remain  17  elements  for  consideration.  In  the  following  the  case  of  each  element  is 
considered  first,  with  estimates  of  its  possible  error.  Then  using  these  possible  errors 
as  probable  errors,  the  most  probable  value  of  ^  is  deduced  by  least  squares.  The 
ratio  S/w2  is  denoted  by  q. 

K.     The  observations  determining  v  are  very  bad.     The  v  adopted  gives  A  = 
D12(2)  =  261A    and    gives    A  =  2932'27±-130--364£   W  ==  39'097±-003,   and   £  is 
about  ±1.     The  value  of  q  from  this  is  361'944±  '11.     This  is  adopted  with  probable 

error  =  '1. 

Rb.     The  only  source  is  from  v,  since  there  is  no  light  from  the 
satellites   are   doubtful.      The   value    in    Table    I.    is    36r40±'5G. 
taken  =  'GG. 

Cs.     Table  I.  gives  361  74  ±  "33.     Dn  (2)  is  so  close  to  17A  that 
to  adopt  it.     The  observations  seem  to  show  that  £  should  1* 
denominator  is  subject  also  to  an  observation  error  of  228. 

the  consequent  value  of  q  is  362'24±  "30,  but  this  value  of  (  makes  the  former 
much  less.     The  relation  may  be  a  coincidence,  as  it  ought  to  be  ne* 
therefore  be  safer  to  take  the  first  adopted  value,  36174±': 

Cu  and  Ag  as  in  Table  L,  viz.,  36r84f8,  361'81±'2. 

Mg      With  £=2,dv  =••  -06,  W  ==  24'362±-002,  ,,  +  *  gives  q  = 

The  actual  first  D  line  has  been  seen  to  be  uncertain,  and  in  any  case  A2  u 
that  the  actual  multiple  cannot  be  obtained.     There  is  an  order  di: 
between  m  =  2  and  3,  but  the  observation  errors,  and  those  Jue  to  f,  give  A  v 
less  exactness  than  from  „,  +  „,.     Value  therefore  adopted,  3 


VOL.  CCXIII.  —  A. 


402  DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL   STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

Ca.     From  Vl  +  Vat  g=  6,  dv  =  *1,  W  =  40'124±*005,  q  =  361'56  +  '60. 

The  denominator  of  D13(2)  =  691 A2  gives  q  =  361*84 ±'1. 

From  the  discussion  of  CaF,  q  =  361*77  ±*2. 

Mantissa  difference  of  CaD  (2)  and  CaD  (3)  =  99A2  =  133542  +  100£±28, 
q  =  361*870  +  1*76,  the  great  uncertainty  being  due  to  g. 

The  most  reliable  appears  to  be  that  from  D13(2),  and  is  included  in  the  others. 
Value  adopted,  361*84±*1. 

Sr.     From  Vl  +  va>  g  =  10,  dv  =  *2,  W  =  87*66±*03,  q  =  361'63±-56. 

The  denominator  of  D13  (2)  does  not  appear  as  a  multiple  of  A2,  whereas  that  of 
D12  =  178A2.  If  this  is  a  real  relation,  q  =  361735  +  '33. 

From  the  F  collaterals  and  the  denominator  of  F  (2),  q  cannot  be  far  from  361  '77  +  *2. 
Adopted  value,  361 77  ±'2. 

Ba.  From  v1  +  v2,  with  g  =  —32,  as  modified  in  Table  II.,  and  +5  allowed,  dv  =  '2 
and  W  =  137'43±*06,  q  =  362'07±'53. 

From  the  D13(2)  collateral  =  69A2,  q  =  361'968±'3 

From  D13(2),  as  found  from  the  F  series,  q  =  361'856±*36. 

From  the  F  discussion,  q  =  361*971  ±*39. 

The  most  reliable  is  probably  the  mean  of  those  depending  on  D13.  Adopted 
value,  361*913  ±'4. 

Ka.     From  Vl  +  v2,  g  =  1,  dv  =  '2,  W  =  226*4  +  '02,  q  =  361'846  +  '66. 

From  the  F  discussion,  q  =  361'94  +  'll,  but  as  there  is  some  uncertainty  in  the 
F  theory,  the  limits  of  error  should  be  greater.  Adopted  value,  36 1*94 +  '33.* 

Zn.     From  VI  +  VK  with  g  =  3,  dv  =  0,  W  =  64'40±'03,  q  =  362'238  +  '36. 

From  Dj3(2),  q  =  361*682±*47,  and  from  the  F  values  lying  between,  362'15  and 
361*87.  Value  adopted,  362*01  ±'25. 

Cd.     From  Vl  +  va,  with  g  =  2,  dv  =  '1,  W  =  112'3  +  *1,  q  =  362'36±*66. 

In  the  D13(2)  theory  Cd  appears  to  occupy  a  similar  position  to  that  of  Sr  in  the 
other  sub-group,  in  that  the  multiple  of  A  is  carried  back  to  Dn  or  D12.  The  most 
accurate  is  that  from  i/!+'(/2.  Adopted  value,  362'36±'66. 

Eu.     From  Vl  +  Va,  with  g  =  10,  dv  =  4,  W  =  151'93±'03,  q  =  361*94±'8. 

From  D13(2),  q  =  361*44±1.     Adopted  value,  361'94±'8. 

Hg.  From  v1  +  v2.  There  is  some  uncertainty  as  to  the  ratio  of  A2 :  At.  A2  =  41$, 
best  agrees  with  the  transference  value  from  Ax  to  A2  discussed  at  the  commencement, 
and  it  gives  a  value  of  A2  =  29725'65  which  is  in  close  agreement  with  the  value 
found  in  the  F  discussion,  viz.,  297 82 -127 '2g. 

*  HONIGSCHMID  ('Sitz.  d.  k.  Akad.  Wiss.  Wien,'  November,  1912)  has  recently  made  a  careful 
determination  of  W,  and  gives  225-97  in  place  of  226-4.  This  would  make  the  oun  363-  llw2— a  value 
quite  inadmissible  if  the  spectroscopic  data  are  reliable.  Although  they  are  not  good,  they  can  hardly  be 
so  uncertain  as  this  value  of  q  would  indicate.  For  what  it  may  be  worth,  the  spectroscopic  data  would 
seem,  therefore,  to  weigh  against  the  acceptance  of  the  new  atomic  weight. 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  403 

The  former  gives  with  £  =  4,  d»  =  0,  W  =  200'3±'3,  q  =  361*423±  1*61,  and  the 

latter  3G2'09  with  a  large  uncertainty  owing  to  127 "2£ 

D,,(2)  gives  q  =  361*50±1*28.  The  large  possible  error  is  due  to  the  uncertainty 
in  the  atomic  weight  of  Hg.  Adopted  value,  36T50±r33. 

Al.  In  Al  also  there  is  a  large  possible  variation  due  to  the  uncertain  atomic 
weight.  W  =  27'10±-05.  From  v,  q  =  361*88  ±1*5.  There  is  an  order  difference 
117  A  between  m  =  2  and  3  for  the  D  series  (see  Table  II).  This  gives 
q  =  361*871  +  1-30.  The  denominator  of  D  (2)  gives  q  =  361777±1'92,  or  if  there 
is  a  satellite  D12(2)  gives  361717±1'92.  Adopted  value,  361'871±1'33. 

In.     From  »,  with  £  =  1,  dv  =  '25,  W  =  114*8±*5,  q  =  361*947±3*31. 

From  D,,(2),  if  22A-16<S,  q  =  361-871,  but  the  theory  is  uncertain.  Adopted 
value,  36 1'947  ±3'33. 

TL  From  v,  q  =  362'00±'20.  From  D,,(2),  q  =  361 '913 ±'6,  but  with  somewhat 
doubtful  theory.  Value  adopted,  362'00  ±'20. 

These  values  for  the  17  elements  weighted  according  to  the  possible  errors  now 
give  q  =  361*890.  This  is  the  same  as  our  first  approximate  value,  but  its  probable 
error  is  much  less.  If  the  determination  of  the  value  depended  only  on  questions  of 
errors  of  calculation  and  of  observation  in  spectral  and  atomic  weight  data,  the  above 
number  would  probably  be  extremely  close  to  the  actual  one.  .It  must  lie  remem- 
bered, however,  that  our  theory  of  the  constitution  is  not  yet  complete.  For 
instance,  in  [II.]  it  was  seen  that  the  supposition  that  N  was  not  constant  for  the 
^-sequence,  but  that  the  value  for  the  first  line  was  slightly  larger  explained  the 
introduction  of  a  term  in  the  denominator.  A  similar  explanation  might  explain  the 
fact  that  the  value  of  q  appears  to  deviate  from  the  mean  by  alwnt  the  same  amount 
in  each  group  of  elements,  and  if  it  were  justified,  the  value  of  q  calculated  as  above 
would  receive  a  slight  modification.  I  believe  it  will  be  found  ultimately  that  the 
true  value  will  lie  within  the  limits  given  by  361'890±'05  or  90*4725±*0125. 

If  the  existence  of  the  oun  as  a  definite  proportion  of  the  (atomic  weight)3  be 
considered  as  established,  the  best  and  most  direct  method  of  determining  the  value 
of  the  factor  q  would  be  from  the  discussion  of  an  element  in  which  the  spectroscopic 
data  are  good  and  in  which  the  atomic  weight  has  been  determined  with  great 
accuracy.  For  this  purpose  we  naturally  turn  to  silver.  Regarded  as  the  ultimate 
standard  of  atomic  weight  determinations,  no  error  in  the  atomic  weight  enters — the 
value  of  q  is  determined  in  terms  of  W  =  =  107*88.  Moreover  its  separation  is  large, 
so  that  any  error  of  measurement  is  a  small  fraction  of  its  total  value,  and  in  addition 
the  actual  error  is  extremely  small.  It  is  therefore  tantalising  to  find  that  the  lines, 
D  (2)  excepted,  are  not  susceptible  of  such  exact  measures  as  in  many  others,  that 
the  typical  series  are  not  well  developed,  and  that  in  fact  there  may  be  a  doubt 
whether  the  lines  generally  accepted  as  the  P,  S,  D  series  follow  laws  altogether 
analogous  to  those  in  other  groups.  In  KAYSER  and  RUNGE'S  measures  four  lines  are 
assigned  to  Da  (2-5)  and  three  to  D,  (2-4),  the  possible  errors  for  DM  being  much  less 

3  F  2 


404  DR.   W.    M.    HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY   OF  Sl'KCTlfAL   SKKIKS. 

than  for  Dn.     Using  D21  —  v  for  DJ2  and  calculating  the  formula  constants  from  the 
first  three,  there  results  for  the  D12  series 

n  =  30644'60-N/L  + '994354- 


m      I 

with  the  large  possible  variation  in  D(oo)  of  £=  12'23.  Using  this  value  of  the 
limit  and  calculating  the  formula  for  Dn,  the  line  Dn  (5)  is  reproduced  with 
O  — C  =  '22,  O  being  '5.  If,  however,  the  S  lines  be  used  with  /u.  =f  the  limit  comes 
to  S(oo)  =  30614'60±3"60  and  the  fourth  line  is  reproduced  within  limits.  S(oo) 
and  D  (  QO  )  cannot  be  the  same  within  error  limits.  If  /a  =  1  +f,  S  (  co )  =  30633 '47  ±  3, 
and  the  limits  can  be  the  same,  viz.,  with  £  =  —  973±2'50  on  D(oo)5  but  /a.  cannot 
be  1  +y*  if  the  doublet  usually  assigned  to  P  belongs  really  to  a  P  series.  I  had 
intended  to  supplement  the  direct  determination  of  A  from  v  by  a  discussion  of 
collaterals,  of  which  both  Ag  and  Cu  afford  a  large  number.  The  doubt  however  about 
the  form  M  =  1  +f,  and  the  presence  of  the  numerous  collaterals,  gives  a  suspicion 
that  the  series  are  related  to  the  F  series  with  limits  based  on  the  typical  S  (  co ),  that 
they  are  analogous  to  the  F  terms  in  the  high  melting-point  elements  of  Group  II., 
and  that  the  doublet  usually  allocated  to  the  P  series  is  really  analogous  to  the 
F  triplets  with  negative  wave  numbers  found  in  Ca  and  Sr.  That  discussion  is 
therefore  held  back  for  the  present.*  But  certain  points  not  open  to  doubt  and 
forming  a  portion  of  the  work  of  the  accurate  determination  command  a  place  here. 

The  D  (2)  lines  are  sharp.  F  and  P  have  measured  the  lines  Dn  (2)  and  D21  (2) 
with  their  interferometer.  Their  measures  give  a  separation  of  900'3419±'0070. 
In  order  to  get  full  advantage  of  their  accuracy,  and  to  avoid  the  uncertainty  due  to 
the  last  significant  figure  it  is  necessary  to  use  logarithmic  tables  with  more  than 
7  figures.  This  has  been  done  on  the  supposition  that  F  and  P's  errors  are  not 
larger  than  '001  A.U.,  i.e.,  unity  in  the  seventh  significant  figure.  The  old  measures 
are  sufficient  to  show  with  certainty  that  the  satellite  difference  is  23^,  and 
the  old  approximation  to  A  will  give  23^  with  an  inappreciable  error,  whence  D12 
can  be  found.  Taking  D  (  GO)  =  30644'6000  +  £  the  mantissa  of  Dn  (2)  =  5465'671  is 
979596'44-120'59£  and  23^  =  2421'18-'15£  Hence  the  mantissa  of  D12  is  the 
difference  or  977175'2G-120'44f  VD12  calculated  from  this  is  12373'6789  +  1'0045£ 
giving  with  VD21  the  value  v  =  920'4431  +  0045£  in  which  the  correction  for  £  is  only 
effective  if  £>  10.  The  value  of  A  calculated  from  this  is  27786'80-l'473f±'20,  in 
which  the  uncertainty  of  '20  is  due  to  the  uncertainty  '001  in  A.  This  value  is  4 
less  than  that  of  Table  I.  obtained  by  supposing  K.Il.'s  values  for  D12  and  D21  had  no 
errors.  It  gives  S  =  (361'754±'0026-'0152f  )iv2.  With  the  mean  value  £  =  -975 
suggested  above  this  becomes  S  =  (361'902±'0026)w2. 

The  foregoing  is  interesting  also  because  it  shows  how  the  application  of  the  laws 
developed  in  the  present  discussion  can  help  towards  more  accurate  determinations  of 

*  The  value  obtained  for  q  from  the  collaterals  was  361-708  ±  -0026  -  0169£,  which  with  £  =  -  10,  as 
indicated  in  the  text,  gives  a  value  surprisingly  close  to  that  deduced  from  all  the  elements  combined. 


DR.    W.    M.    HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES.  405 

quantities  involved.     For  instance,  it  has  enabled  UB  to  obtain  a  value  of  *  correct 
to  about  a  unit  in  the  sixth  significant  figure.     In  the  case  of  Au,  the  knowledge 
is  still  more  fragmentary  than  in  Ag  and  the  value  of  A  has  not  been  determined. 
By  the  application  of  our  new  laws,  however,  it  is  possible  to  obtain  a  good  deal 
of  information  based  on  evidence  of  weight,  and  it  will  be  int»M-«sting  to  consider 
it  shortly  here.     Although  the  spectrum  of  Au  shows  many  analogies  with  those  of 
Cu  and   Ag,  no  lines  have  been  assigned  to  the  S  or  D  series.     Tin-re  is  a  strong 
doublet  in  the  ultra-violet    2676*05,  2428'06  (v  =  3815*28)  analogous  to    the    linen 
allocated  to  the  P  series  in  Cu  and  Ag.     There  is  only  one  other  doublet  in  K.H.'s 
list  with  the  same  separation,  viz.,  6278'37,  506475  (»  =  3815'54).     This  is  clearly 
analogous  to  the  doublets  5782*30,  5700*39  in  Cu  and  5545*86,  5276*4  in  Ag,  which 
have  the  respective  doublet  separations  but  which  do  not  belong  to  the  S  or  D  series. 
E  and  H  however  give  an  arc  line  at  4811*81,  which  gives  a  separation  of  3815*57 
with   K.K.'s  line  at  4065'22.     This  has  the  appearance  of  a  D  set,  D,,  being  at 
4792*79  with  a  satellite  separation  of  82*47.     But  if  so  it  is  quite  out  of  step  with 
the  progression  of  the  Dia  lines  for  Cu  and  Ag,  viz.,  5220  (Cu),  547l(Ag).      But 
5837'64  gives  with  the  above  479279  a  separation  3733*43  the  same  as  that  between 
4792  and  4065,  and  they  are  in  step  with  Cu  and  Ag  as  D,,  (2)  and  D«(2),  the 
fainter  satellite  D12  being  unobserved.    This  would  seem  the  more  probable  allocation. 
In  any  case,  the  curious  doubling  of  a  D  type  would  have  to  be  explained.     There  is, 
however,  here  not  sufficient  data   to  determine   the  limits,  or  the  other  formulas 
constants  or  the  value  of  A.     But  it  is  possible  to  arrive  at  a  probable  estimate  by 
the  following  considerations.     The  limit  D  (  »)  will  probably  be  in  step  with  those  of 
Cu  and  Ag,  viz.,  31515,  30644,  i.e.,  will  l>e  in  the  neighbourhood  of  30000.     Now  A 
must  give  v  =  3815*54  and  must  itself  be  a  multiple  of  the  oun,  in  fact  if  it  is  similar 
to  Cu  and  Ag  of  <54.     Now  W  ==  l'J7'20  with  an  uncertainty  of  a  few  units  in  the 
second  decimal  place.     The  ratio  q  =  361'80*  +  y,  where  y  is  probably  not  greater 
than  1  in  the  first  decimal  place  and  it  will  be  regarded  as  a  correction  on  the  *l 
From  this  it  follows  that  S  =  1406'930±*097  +  '38y.     The  uncertainty  *097  due  to 
the  uncertainty  in  W  produces  so  small  an  effect  that  it  may  be  neglected  here. 
Now  A  must  tie  a  multiple  of  S  and  must  give  with  the  proper  value  of  D(oo), 
v=  3815*54 +  *30s,  '30  being  the  maximum  error  of  v  and  therefore  s  between  ±1. 
This  condition  gives  the  following  sets  of  possible  limits  in  the  neighbourhood  of 
D(co)  =  30,000:-  30819-15  + r57*-6y  with  A  =  76<* 

about    30542  ,.  77f5 

30266  ,,  785 

„       29994  7:' 

„       29724 

29465*18  +  l'45.<r-57y    „  8lJ 

*  The  actual  calculations  were  made  before  the  last  most  probable  361-890  was  obtained,  but  nothing 
is  to  lie  gained  by  recalculating  to  it. 


406  DK.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

If  now  the  lines  5837'64,  479279  lie  taken  as  Dn  (2),  D21  (2),  their  wave  numbers  are 
17125-54('14),  20858'97('22),  giving  for  the  wave  number  of  D12(2),  or  D21-i/,  the 
value  17043'43  ('22q—  '30s).  In  this  '22g  is  the  possible  observation  error  in  D2]  (2). 
The  satellite  separation  of  82'11  must  therefore  be  caused  by  a  denominator  difference 
which  is  also  a  multiple  of  St.  If  this  be  tested,  it  is  found  at  once  that  only  the  first 
and  last  of  the  above  set  can  satisfy  this  condition,  3.0819  taking  24^  or  GS,  and 
29465  taking  28^  or  78.  The  corresponding  values  for  Cu  and  Ag  are  both  23^. 
The  differences  between  the  values  calculated  from  the  lines  and  from  the  multiples 
of  S1  are  (p  between  ±1  giving  the  observation  error  in  Dn  (2)). 

'Oy+14p-22g  with  24^  =  8441 

=  9869. 


It  is  clear  that  either  can  easily  be  made  to  vanish  well  within  possible  errors, 
more  especially  the  latter.  The  limit  30819  is  higher  than  that  of  Ag  instead  of 
lower  as  might  be  inferred  from  the  fact  that  the  limit  of  Ag  is  lower  than  that  of  Cu. 
The  limit  29465  is  1179  below  that  of  Ag,  which  is  itself  931  below  that  of  Cu. 
This  seems  a  probable  order  of  magnitude,  especially  when  it  is  remembered  that  there 
is  a  gap  in  the  Periodic  Table  between  Ag  and  Au.  But  there  is  further  evidence  in 
favour  of  the  latter.  If  the  lines  6278'37,  506475  are  collaterals  of  D  (2)  as  the 
corresponding  lines  in  Cu  and  Ag  appear  to  be,  6278'37  should  be  Dn(2)(xSl). 
With  the  limit  30819  this  cannot  possibly  be  the  case.  The  oun  Sl  =  351  is  so  large 
that  there  can  be  no  doubt.  If  however  the  limit  is  29465,  the  line  is  Dn  (2)  (A+  15^). 
Further,  with  neither  limit  is  the  mantissa  of  D  (2)  a  multiple  of  S,  and  as  this  is  also 
not  the  case  with  Ag  or  Cu,  it  may  be  regarded  that  in  this  group  either  these  lines 
are  not  of  the  D  type,  or  possibly  like  the  high  melting-point  elements  of  Group  II. 
the  first  lines  correspond  to  m  =  1  and  not  m  =  2.  The  actual  values  of  the 
denominators  as  found  are  so  close  to  the  same  value  for  all  three  elements  as  to 
suggest  the  existence  of  a  group  constant.  If  the  limit  29465  is  used  the  denominators 
are  as  given  below,  and  as  is  seen  they  differ  from  such  a  constant  by  very  small 
multiples  of  S. 

Cu.  Ag.  Au. 

Density.     .     .     978276(21)'  977162(19)  971409(26) 

146  =  S  1263  =  3i  7034  =  53 


978422(21)  978425(19)  978443(26) 

or  say  a  group  constant  978430.  Whether  this  apparent  equality  corresponds 
to  a  real  relation  or  not  must  be  left  for  further  evidence.  In  any  case  a  limit 
D  ( o°)  =  30819  would  throw  this  relation  quite  out. 


DR.   W.   M.  HICKS :    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECT1CAL  SEKLES.  407 

As  a  final  result  the  evidence  would  seem  conclusive  that  D(oo)  for  Au  is 
29465'18±7,  that  A  =  81*  =  1139Gl±31'5y,  and  that  the  satellite  separation  is 
produced  by  28^. 

Summary. 

It  must  be  confessed  that  much  of  the  foregoing  discussion  is  of  a  problematical 
nature,  and  that,  in  fact,  some  of  the  suggestions  offered  are  incompatible  with  one 
another.  This  is  no  objection  in  a  preliminary  search  for  general  principles,  as  the 
raising  of  questions  is  only  next  in  importance  to  answering  them.  Nevertheless, 
some  results  appear  to  be  well  established  and  others  to  have  considerable  evidence  in 
their  favour.  Amongst  the  first  are — 

(1)  The   dependence   of    the    spectrum   of  an    element   on    its   oun,   a  quantity 
proportional  to  the  square  of  its  atomic  weight  and  which  prolwbly  does  not  differ 
from  S1  =  90'4725M>3  by  more  than  '013102  where  w  denotes  one-hundredth  of  the 
atomic  weight ; 

(2)  The  direct   dependence  of  the   ordinary  doublet   and    triplet   separations  on 
multiples  of  the  oun  ; 

(3)  A  similar  dependence  of  the  satellite  separations  in  the  Diffuse — or  the  1st 
associated — series  on  multiples  of  the  same  quantity  ; 

(4)  The  existence  of  collateral  displacement,  whereby  new  lines  are  formed  by  the 
addition  or  subtraction  of  multiples  of  the  oun.     Until,  however,  the  laws  which 
govern  the  formation  of  collaterals  are  more  fully  known,  it  is  not  safe  to  assume  that 
any  displacement  indicated  by  mere  numerical  coincidence  corresponds  to  the  physical 
change  such  collateral  indicates.     Nevertheless,  many  cases  of  clear  displacement  of 
this  kind,  involving  considerable  multiples  of  A,  especially  in  the  F  series,  are  given 
which  serve  to  give  more  accurate  values  of  the  oun. 

The  conditions  which  govern  the  various  multiples  of  the  oun  which  enter  in  the 
various  separations  have  not  been  determined.  It  is  probable,  however,  that  the 
multiple  for  the  doublet,  or  first  two  of  a  triplet,  in  the  two  sub-groups  of  the 
nth  group  of  elements  contain  2/H-l  and  2w  +  2  respectively  as  factors. 

It  is  probable  that  the  mantissa  of  the  normal  first  line  of  the  Diffuse  series,  the 
last  satellite,  when  such  exists,  being  considered  as  the  normal,  is  a  multiple  of  A, 
and  it  is  possible  that  its  magnitude  has  some  general  relation  of  approximation  to 
that  of  the  corresponding  F  series,  which  again  may  depend  directly  on  a  group 

constant. 

It  is  possible  that  the  wave  numbers  of  the  lines  in  the  Diffuse  and  F  series  may 
not  depend  directly  on  a  mathematical  function  of  the  order  m  of  the  line,  and  it  is 
probable  that  this  is  the  case  when  there  are  no  satellites,  the  differences  now  being 
multiples  of  the  A  themselves. 

In  the  discussion  of  the  material  it  has  been  attempted  to  keep  the  mind  as  free  as 


408  DR.   W.    M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 

possible  from  any  preconceived  theories  as  to  the  origin  of  the  vibrations  which  give 
the  lines.  The  aim  has  been  to  discover  relations,  which  it  must  be  the  object  of 
theories  to  explain.  Nevertheless,  the  way  in  which  multiples  of  a  quantity  depending 
directly  on  the  element  enter,  and  indeed  multiples  of  these  multiples,  irresistibly 
suggests  that  each  line  is  due  to  a  special  configuration  built  up  of  aggregates  of  the 
same  kind.  Thus,  in  the  Zn  group  appear  multiples  of  6^,  in  Mg,  of  5(5,,  &c.  These 
smaller  aggregates  peculiar  to  a  group  then  appear  to  enter  like  radicals  into  more 
complex  aggregates,  e.g.,  in  Zn  Aj  =  31<V  A2  =  15^B,  and  again,  multiples  of  A2  occur 
in  collaterals.  In  cases,  a  certain  aggregate,  normally  to  be  expected,  appears  to  be 
affected  with  instability,  a  certain  number  of  ouns  are  expelled  or  added  and  we  get 
a  stable  collateral.  In  the  case  of  rich  spectra  and  of  spark  spectra,  a  very  large 
proportion  of  the  lines  appear  to  be  collaterally  connected.  It  suggests  systems  in 
which  a  greater  freedom  of  aggregation  is  permissible.  But  there  is  another  way  in 
which  the  matter  may  be  looked  at.  The  actual  multiples  may  be  determined  by  the 
number  of  electrons  taking  part  in  the  vibrations,  and  the  quantity  enters  into  the 
formula  as  the  product  of  this  number  by  a  fundamental  quantity  of  the  atom.  But 
it  is  difficult  to  see  how  this  quantity  should  depend  on  the  square  of  the  mass.  It 
would  almost  look  as  if  the  gravitational  pressure  of  two  atoms  always  at  the  same 
distance  produced  some  change  in  the  configuration  of  the  surrounding  aether 
proportional  to  the  pressure,  and  that  the  vibrations  were  conditioned  by  this  change 
and  by  definite  numbers  of  electrons.  In  any  case,  the  existence  of  the  oun,  and  the 
extent  in  which  its  influence  is  shown  in  a  spectrum,  point  to  the  conclusion  that  the 
positive  atom  plays  an  essential  part  in  at  least  those  vibrations  emitted  which  are 
slow  enough  for  us  to  observe. 

APPENDIX  I. 

The  Value  of  A  in  Scandium. 

The  value  of  A  as  a  multiple  of  $  in  Scandium  is  of  importance  in  connection  with 
the  evidence  as  to  the  curious  relation,  that  the  A's  of  the  first  elements  of  the  two 
sub-groups  in  the  nth  group  are  multiples  of  (2n+l)  ^  and  (2n  +  2)  S^  The  lines  in 
the  visible  part  have  been  measured  by  FOWLER,*  and  lines  both  in  visible  and  ultra- 
violet by  EXNER  and  HASHEK.f 

I  do  not  altogether  feel  full  confidence  in  the  allocation  suggested  below,  but  it 
gives  related  series,  even  if  not  the  typical  ones,  and  so  will  serve  to  determine  A. 
The  doublet  separation  is  320+  a  small  fraction.  There  are  over  34  doublets  with 
this  separation — two,  3613'96,  357271  and  3576'52,  3535'88  containing  some  of  the 
strongest  lines  in  the  spectrum.  The  lines  suggested  for  the  S  series  appear  to  show 

*  '  Phil.  Trans.,'  209,  p.  66. 

t  '  Spektren  der  Elemente  :  Bogenspektren.' 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIKS. 


109 


satellites   in   the  first  two  sets.     Further,  it  appears  that  the  P  series  take  the 
s-sequence  and  the  S  series  the  p-sequence  as  is  the  rule  outside  the  alkaliea 


m. 

4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 


2. 


3. 


1. 


2. 


The  P  Lines. 
(Figures  in  brackets  give  intensities.) 


P,. 

(5)5717-51 
(5)5258-49 
(2)5021-67 
(1)4880-90 
(2)4791-69 
(2)4728-95 
(0)4682-16 


1.  (6)6413-54 


*V  n,. 

(0)5721-20  17485-35 
1901170 
19908-26 
20482-40 
2086372 
21140-54 
2135178 

S  Series. 

(3)6284-66         1558778 
84-35 


11-27 


319-65 


(6)6379-02 
(15)3646-46 

(50)3642-93 
(2)3139-98 

(3)5146-43 
(6)5392-30 


(\b) 3603-1 


15672-13 

2742371 

25-81 

27449-52 


322-39 


(1)310870          31838-31 

Parallel  S  Series. 
(0)5323'1)4          18457-31 


320-37 


320-65 


82-60 
18539-91 


(2)  3273-76 


17474-08 


15907-43 


27746'K) 


32I58T.H 


1K777'96 


30537-33 


TJie  S  Series—  For  a  reason  to  be  seen  shortly,  it  is  necessary  to  regard  S,, ( 1 ), 
Sn(2),  S,(3)  as  the  typical  series,  S,(3)  as  not  displaced,  but  the  doublets  corre- 
sponding to  1  and  2  are  displaced  collaterally  to  S».  In  other  words,  we  have  t«  do 
with  bodily  displacements  of  the  first  two  doublets  and  not  true  satellites.  The 
mean  of  the  doublets  gives  „  =  320'80,  and  the  formula  calculated  from  the  three 
lines  is 

37949-90-N/(m+ 1-244902-    ™™ 

VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  J    G 


410  DR.    W.   M.    HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

With  the  value  of  v  above  the  value  of  A  calculates  with  this  limit  to  7140  = 
with  <^  =  70 '34.  The  denominator  differences  of  Sn  and  S13  for  m  =  1  and  2  are 
respectively  4188  and  3964,  i.e.,  close  to  59S  =  4150  and  57^  =  4010,  with  errors  in 
d\  of  '31  and  0,  divided  between  the  two  sets  of  lines.  It  is  possible  they  may  be 
the  same  within  limits  of  error  (59<?),  when  the  value  of  d\  in  the  second  would 
be  -'16. 

The  formula  for  P,  calculated  from  the  first  three  lines,  is 

n  =  22281'97-N/(m  + '828585- 


.'97-N/l 


m 


This  formula  gives  the  following  values  of  O  —  C  for  the  lines  for  m  =  7,  8,  9,  10, 
viz.,  —'55,  '85,  '26,  —  1'86.  If  the  denominator  be  treated  in  the  same  way  as 
Al,*  i.e.,  deducting  the  group  constant  '043761,  it  may  be  put  into  the  form 

-'043761  +  '872346(l-  21480))    which     reproduces     the    '215     constant.       Also 


m 

m 


VS(l)  =  22277'80  =  P(  QO)  within  error  limits. 

If  8^3)  had  been  taken  as  S12(3)  this  would  not  have  been  the  case.  But  VP(l) 
extrapolates  to  40717'20  with  a  denominator  1'641213,  whilst  S  ( <*>)  =  39749'90 
with  a  denominator  1 '699998,  and  they  cannot  be  the  same  even  approximately  if 
the  typical  formula  holds.  The  extrapolated  value  of  VP(l)  requires  A  =  6428  to 
give  v  =  320'8  or  91<5,  again  giving  a  multiple  of  7<^  and  at  the  same  time  more  in 
line  with  other  elements  as  being  a  multiple  of  S  itself,  and  a  multiple  more  in  step 
with  them.  It  points  to  the  likelihood  that  the  series  chosen  for  S  is  a  parallel  series 
to  the  true  S,  i.e.,  the  VS  (m)  is  correct.  If  so,  using  the  values  of  VS(l,  2)  with 
S  ( oo )  =  the  extrapolated  limit  40717,  we  should  expect  doublets  with  the  first  lines 
at  18440  and  30217.  There  is  a  doublet  at  18457'31,  no  line  observed  at  30217,  but 
the  doublet  companion  expected  at  30537  is  found  at  30537 '33.  Also  18457  appears 
as  a  satellite  to  a  stronger  line  18539'91  in  a  corresponding  position  82' 60  a-head. 
The  second  set  of  lines  above  is,  therefore,  probably  the  true  S  series,  the  first  being 
a  parallel  one.  With  limit  40717'20  and  v  =  319'45,  the  mean  of  all  the  doublets, 
the  value  for  A  is  6404  =  QlS  with  S  =  361'89it'2.  The  value  of  361'89  is  subject  to 
considerable  uncertainty  owing  to  uncertainties  in  the  limit  value  and  the  atomic 
weight,  and  its  agreement  with  the  final  estimate  for  the  oun  is  a  mere  coincidence. 
The  spectrum  of  Sc  is  a  most  interesting  one,  but  its  discussion  must  be  postponed. 
The  object  of  touching  upon  it  here  is  to  obtain  some  indication  of  the  nature  of  its 
oun  as  Sc  occupies  the  first  place  in  its  sub-group.  It  would  clearly  appear  that  the 
multiple  of  the  oun  in  A  contains  7  as  a  factor,  viz.,  13  x  7^  =  52  x  7(V 

The  separation  of  PI(±)  and  P2(4)  is  11 '26,  corresponding  to  a  denominator 
difference  of  5607  =  80<5.  This  is  in  fair  agreement  with  the  case  of  other  P  series  in 
which  the  differences  for  orders  below  the  first  are  about  '8  A. 

*  [II.,  p.  46.] 


DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CItlTICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 


411 


APPENDIX  II. 

The  I)  Scries. 


Na. 


K. 


S. 

(2)8196-1 

8184-5 

P.    (2) 

1177173 

1168976 

K.R. 

5688-26 

5682-90 

S. 

6966-3 

Kl   *                1  *  1  1  O  LJ   •  t> 
.  It.      tt'MM  o 

» 

4983-58 

4979-30 

K.R. 

5832-23 

5812-54 

» 

4669-4 

4665'2 

,, 

5359-88 

5343-35 

" 

4500-0 

4494'3 

„ 

5112-68 

509775 

Z. 

4393-5 

4390'! 

„ 

4965-5 

4952-2 

" 

4324'S 

4321-3 

S. 

487T3 

S.       4856'B 

" 

42767 

4273'6 

1,1). 

4808*8 

L.I).    4796-8 

» 

424  1'8 

4239-0 

M 

4759-8 

,. 

4215'S 

4213-0 

„ 

41957 

4192-8 

„ 

4180-2 

4177-2 

4168 


S. 


K.R. 


RE. 


K.U. 


Rb. 

Cs. 

5290-3 
7759-5  1 

14754-0 
7619-2 

P.  (2)361277  -i 
34892-5  J 

30099-9 

7757-9  J 

6298-8 

K.R.  6206'7 

9208-3  -» 
9172-5  J 

876  1  '5 

5724-41 

5648-18 

S.     6983-8  I 

K.R.  6  7  23  '« 

54:51-83 

5362-94 

K.R.    6973-9  J 

5260-51 

519576 

RE.     62  17  T)  -i 

6010-59 

515T20 

5089-25 

K.R.    62KT4  J 

5()76'3 
5023 

5017 
K.H.  4963 

RE.     5847  "86  i 
5845-3  1/ 

5664'U 

4983 

„   4926 

5635*44 

5466*1 

4953 

4892 

5503-1 

534T15 

5414-4 

5256-96 

5351 

5199 

5304 

5154 

H.   5118 

3  o  2 


412 


DK.   \V.   M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY  OF   SPECTRAL   SERIES. 


(2)  3838-44 
3097-06 

2852-22? 

Mg. 
3832-46 

3093-14 

2848-53 

3829'Sl 
3091-18 
2846-91 

(2)  19917 
19864 
19777 

M 

•6 
•4    J 

Ca. 

19507-1    1 

19452-9    J 

19310-6 

2736-84 

2733-80 

2732-35 

4456 

•81"] 

4435-86  1 

4425-61 

2672-90 

2669-84 

2668-26 

4456'OS  j> 

4435-13/ 

2633-13 

2630'52 

. 

4454 

•97  J 

2605-4? 

3644-861 
3644-50  J 

3631-101 
3630-83  J 

3624'IS 

3361 

•92 

3350-22 

3344-49 

3225 

74 

3215-15 

3209-68 

3150 

'85 

3140-91 

3136-09 

- 

3101 

•87 

(2)  301107    1 
29225'9   J 

Sr. 
27356-2    1 

26915-4   J 

26024-5 

- 

Ba. 

4971-85"] 
4968'H  I 

4876-351 
4872-66.J 

4832'23 

(3)5819-291 
5800-48  \ 

S.  5536-071 
5519-37/ 

5424-82 

4962-45  J 

5777' 

84J 

4033-25"] 

3970-151 

3940'91 

4506' 

"1 

4333-041 

4264-45 

4032-51  I 

3969-42J 

4493' 

82  I 

4323-15J 

4030-45  J 

4489' 

50J 

3705-88  J 

3653'90l 
3653-32  J 

362915' 
3628-62- 

1            S.  4087" 

53  L 

S.  3947'6    1 
„  3946'6    J 

3889'45 

3547-92 

3499'40 

3477'33 

„   4084- 

94  J 

3457-70 

341T62 

3390'09 

„  3895 

2 

„  3767-5 

3400-39 

„  3787 

(2)  3346-041 
3345-62  I 
3345-13J 

Zn. 
3303-031 

3302-67  J 

3282-42 

(2)  364974 
3614-58 
3613-04 

Cd. 
-j       3500-09    1       3403-74 

3467'76     [• 
3466-33    J 

1 

2771-051 

2756-53 

3610-66 

- 

2801-17  > 

2770-94  J 

3005-53 

•}       2903-24    "]       2837'01 

2801-00  J 

2982'Gl 

2881-34     i- 

2608-65 

2582-57 

2570-00 

2981-46 

2880-88    J 

2516'GO 

2491-67 

2479-85 

298075 

_, 

DR 

Zn 

2463-47 
243074 


W.   M.   HICKS:    A  CRITICS  STUDY  OF 
(continued). 


2439-94 
2407-98 


Eu. 


(2)  3637-84 


3638-22 

3629-94 

362270 

3004-9 

3001-48 


2683*29  -I 
.268272-1 

2564-27 
(see  [II.,  p. 


3212'89 


2596-49 


2708-91 


2455-03 


2423'OS 
2401-15 
2387-41 
60]  for  details) 


2764-29 
2763-99 
2660*45 
260T99 


SPECTRAL  SERIES.  41.3 

Cd  (continued). 

2677-65  2639T>3 


(2)  368074 
3663'46 
3663-05 
3654-94 
3650'Sl 
3027'62 
302579 
302371 
302  T64 
2806-844 
2805-422 
2804-521 
2803-69 
2700-92 
2699'503 
2698-885 
2639-92 
2603'IG 
2578-34 
256T15 
2548-51 


253174 
2525-90 
2521-27 
2517-57 
2514-48 


2580-33 
2525-57 

Hg, 

3144-61 
313T94 
313T68 
312578 

2655-29 
2653*89 
2652-20 

2483-871 
2482763 
2482-072 

2400-570' 

2399'HIU 

2399-435 

2352-647 

2323-0 


2544-84 


2967-64 
2967-37 


253672 
2534-89 


} 

. 


2380-06  n 
2378 '392  J 


23(12-16/1 


2258-871 


414 


DR.   W.    M.    HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 


Al. 


Ga. 


(2)  3092-951 
3092-84  J 

3082-27 

See  Part  II., 

p.  71. 

2575-491 

2568'OS 

2575-20J 

2373-451 
2373-23  J 

2367-16 

2269-20 

2263-52 

2210'IS 

220473 

2174-13 

2168-87 

2150-69 

2145*48 

2134'Sl 

2129-52 

2123-44 

2118-58 

In. 

Tl. 

(2)  3258-661 
3256-17/ 

3039-46 

(2)  3529-581 
3519-39/ 

2767'97 

2714'05l 
2710-38/ 

2560-25 

2921-631 
2918-43/ 

2379-66 

2523-081 
•2521-45J 

2389-64 

2710771 
2709-33/ 

2237-91 

2430-8    1 

2306-8 

2609-861 

2168-68 

2429  76  J 

2609-08  J 

237974 

2260'6 

2553-071 

2129-39 

2230-9 

2552-62J 

2211-2 

2517-50 

0.  2105'! 

2197-5 

2494-00 

„  2088'S 

2187'S 

2477-58 

„  2077-3 

2180'G 

2465-54 

„   2069-2 

2456-53 

„  2062-3 

2449-57 

„   2057-3 

2444'OG 

„   2053-9 

2439-58 

„   2050-6 

„   2048-4 

DR.   W.   M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 


II  , 


P.  (2)   9264-28 
R.P.    6158-415 
5330-835 
„       4968-94 
„       4773-94 
4055*54 
„       4577-84 
452370 


I)'". 

615G'993 

5329774 

4968-04 

4773-07 

405474 


O. 


6165-198 

5329-162 

4907-58 

477272 

4654-41 


D". 

P.  (2)  11287'G 
R.P.      7002-48 
595875* 
5512-92 
513070 
4973-05 


4576-97 
4522-95 


New  D. 

R.P.  (3)  626478  626 T68  6256'81 
5410'97  5408'80  5405'08 
5037"U 


s. 

R.P.  (4)  6757-40  6749-06  6743'92 

6052-97  6046-23  6042'17 

5706-44  5700-58  5G97'02 

5507-20  550178  5498*38 

5381-19  5375-98  5372'82 

5295-86  5290-89  5287'88 


Se. 


7062 

7014-25  1 
7010-86/ 

J  6325*81 

6284'Sl 

1  6325-4 

6284-19 

J"  5902-08 
159617 

5925-31 
5925-13 

J  5753*52  5718-5 
1 5752-31  5718*28 

5618'OS 

5528-64  5497'OG 

5464-82 


0990-90' 


5909-49 


5703-86 


Double. 


416 


DR.    W.    M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY   OF  SPECTRAL   SERIES. 


The  F  Series. 


Na. 

P.    18459-5 

„    12677'G 


Eb. 

P.   4G960     ? 
EL.  134437 
„    1008T9 
BN.    8872 
8271 


Ca. 

K.E. 

6169-87 

6161'60 

L. 

5) 

6169-36 

)) 

Rs. 

4586-12 

4581*66 

4578'Sl 

K.E. 

5) 

4098-66 

4095'OS 

409276 

E.H. 

)» 

3875-85 

3872-60 

3870-57 

K.E. 

)  ) 

3753-56 

3750-40 

3748-39 

?) 

» 

3678'46 

3675'53 

3673-49 

F. 

K.E.  5601-51 

„   5588-96 
5270-45 


5594-64 
5582-16 
5264-46 


5590-30 


5260-58 


K. 

P.  84520 

| 

„  15165 

'8 

„  11028 

•o 

BN.  9590 

„   8908 

„   8500 

Cs. 

P.  30099-9  ? 

293W3  ? 

EL.  10124-0 

10025'S 

„   8083'!  -1 

8020'6 

8080'9  J 

S.   7280-5 

7228-8 

„   6872-6 

6826-9 

„   6630-5 

6588 

„   6475 

6434 

Sr. 

L.  J6754-21 

5)        *• 

6708-10 
6644'OS   6616'92 

K.E.  r 

4869'41   4855'27 

E.H.  <  4892-90  K.E.  4868'92 

K.E.  [4892-20 

4338'OG 

4319-39   4308-49 

F.    4087'67 

4071*01   4061-21 

3950-96 

3935-33   3926-27 

S.    3867-3 

i  in  Ca  and  Sr. 

K.E.  5535-01 

5504-48    5486-37 

„  .  5481'IS 

5451-08 

„   5257-12 

5229-52    5213-23 

DR.   W.   M.  HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERIES. 


417 


Ba. 


l;, 


7488'38 
HR.  7280-58 


K.R. 


HR.     f  7637 '47 
L.     <  7420-96 

HR.    [7417-80 

HL.       534971      K.R.  5277'84 
469174  4636-80 

440275(1)  4350-49 

4224*1 1(2)  4179'57(3> 

<»F12(5)(AS). 

Mg. 

P.   14877-1 
10812-9 


L.  7197-99 


R.&P.  5778-5    5553-81 


4605'H 

4333*04* 

4166-24 

»  F,(6)(9A.). 
*  Dss  (4)  and  Fs  (5)  not  resolved. 


4444-4 


4682-359     4533'327 


P.  16498-6 


Zn. 
16490-3 


164837 


Cd. 

P.   16482-2       16433- 
)> 

Al. 

P.  11255-5 
8775-1 


16401-5 
11630-8 


Hg. 

P.   17195  17110-05       16919-84 

„    1202T28  1188771 

TL 

P.   16340'S  16123-0 

„    11594-5  11482-2 


Na.  The  first  seven  doublets  were  allocated  by  RYDBERO,  using  the  measurement* 
by  ANGSTROM,  THALEN,  and  LIVEING  and  DEWAR.  They  were,  also  so  given  by 
K.  and  R.  The  remainder  were  given  by  ZKJKENDRAHT.  The  actual  measures 
given  in  the  list  are  by  the  observers  indicated  by  the  letters. 

K.  Both  RYDBERG  and  KAYSER  and  RUNGE  interchanged  the  S  and  D  series, 
allocating  those  in  the  list  to  the  S  series.  This  was  first  corrected  by  Rm.*  The 
mistake  is  repeated  in  KAYSER'S  '  Spectroscopie,'  Bd.  V.  The  line  6938 "8  covers  both 
KD2(3)  and  KSt  (2).  The  pair  at  4871  were  first  observed  by  L.D.,  but  the  more 
recent  measurements  by  S.  are  inserted. 

Rb.  RL.  refers  to  RANDALL,  RE.  to  RAMAGE.  The  lines  3-6  were  allocated  by 
RYDBERG,  and  by  K.R.  The  first  doublet  was  observed  and  allocated  by  RANDALL. 
The  second  doublet  has  raised  the  question  of  whether  Rb  possesses  satellites.  The  line 
7757  has  only  been  observed  by  SAUNDERS,  who  allocates  it  to  RbDu  (3),  with  7759'5  as 


VOL.  CCXIII. — A. 


•  Ann.  d  Phys.,'  12,  1903,  p.  444. 
3   H 


418  DR.    W.   M.   HICKS:    A   CRITICAL   STUDY   OF   SPECTRAL   SERIES. 

satellite.  But  EDER  and  VALENTA  observe  7 7 59 '5  and  not  7757,  whereas  the  former 
if  a  satellite  should  be  fainter  than  the  latter.  The  question  is  discussed  in  [I.]  and 
also  in  the  present  communication,  and  the  weight  of  evidence  would  appear  to  be 
against  the  existence  of  satellites  in  Rubidium.  I  have  entered  the  third  line  as 
6298 '8  instead  of  K.R.'s  value  of  62987,  because  the  former  value  agrees  with 
independent  observations  by  E.V.,  S.,  and  E.H.,  and  gives  a  better  value  for  v. 

Cs.  The  first  were  observed  and  allocated  by  PASCHEN,  the  second  first  by 
LEHMANN,  but  the  measures  are  those  of  PASCHEN.  SAUNDERS  was  the  first  to  draw 
attention  to  the  satellites. 

The  last  line,  5118,  was  observed  by  HARTLEY,  and  is  clearly  the  D2(12)  line.  The 
corresponding  D!  (12)  would  be  in  the  neighbourhood  of  5256'96,  or  D2(9). 

Mg,  Ca.  The  lines  were  all  assigned  by  RYDBERG.  He  also  wrongly  assigned  two 
lines  about  12000  to  MgD(l).  The  measures  are  by  K.R.,  except  the  ultra-red  in 
Ca  due  to  PASCHEN  ('  Ann.  d.  Phys.,'  29,  p.  655). 

Sr.     Assigned  and  observed  by  K.R.,  except  ultra-red  due  to  PASCHEN. 

Ba.  Assigned  by  SAUNDERS  (' Astrophys.  Journ.,'  28,  p.  223).  The  measures  are 
those  of  K.R.,  except  those  with  S.  attached. 

Zn.  The  lines  down  to  D2  (6)  with  the  exception  of  the  satellites  were  assigned  by 
RYDBERG.  The  measures,  as  well  as  allocations  of  the  others  are  by  K.R. 

Cd.  Lines  to  D2  (4),  satellites  excepted,  assigned  by  RYDBERG.  The  remainder 
allocated  and  all  the  measures  by  K.R. 

Eu.  The  Eu  spectrum  gives  evidence  of  much  collateral  disturbance,  and  the 
unobserved  D  lines  are  possibly  displaced  in  this  way. 

Hg.  The  Dn  lines  to  Dn(4)  assigned  by  RYDBERG,  to  D3(5)  satellite  by  K.R. 
D!  (6)  to  Dj  (16)  by  MILNER  ('  Phil.  Mag.,'  (6),  20,  p.  636). 

Al.  RYDBERG  gives  the  first  two  doublets  without  the  satellites  and  assigns  11280 
wrongly  to  D  (l).  Further  he  assigns  D  lines  to  the  S  series,  but  the  observations  at 
his  disposal  were  too  inexact.  The  measures  and  allocations  are  by  K.R. 

In.  RYDBERG  down  to  Di(5)  with  satellites  of  first  two.  The  remainder  and  all 
the  measures  by  K.R.  As  in  the  S  series  it  should  be  noted  how  the  D2  lines  are 
more  persistent  than  the  Dj. 

Tl.  RYDBERG  gives  all  except  from  D^IO),  and  he  gives  D2  down  to  m  =  15. 
The  measures  given  are  by  K.R.  except  those  below  2105,  which  are  due  to  CORNU. 

The  F  Lines. 

BERGMANN  in  1908  (' Z.  S.  f.  Wiss.  Phot.,'  6,  see  also  '  BEIBL.,'  xxxii.,  p.  956) 
measured  lines  in  the  ultra-red  spectra  of  the  Alkalies  and  observed  in  Cs  a  number  of 
doublets  which  clearly  formed  a  series,  and  a  few  lines  in  Na,  K,  Rb  which  were 
evidently  analogous.  It  was,  however,  RUNGE  ('Astrophys.  Journ.,'  27,  p.  158; 
'  Phys.  Z.  S./  9,  p.  1)  who  pointed  out  the  dependence  of  the  limit  of  the  series  on 


DR.  W.   M.  HICKS:    A  CRITICAL  STUDY  OF  SPECTRAL  SERO&  419 

D  (2).  The  lines  in  the  far  ultra-red  have  since  been  observed  by  PABCHKN  ('  Ann. 
d.  Phys.,'  33,  1910,  p.  717).  BERGMANN'S  lines  began  with  the  order  m  ==  4,  but  in 
the  lists  above  more  recent  and  more  accurate  measures  by  others  have  been  inserted. 
BN.  refers  to  BERGMANN,  RL.  to  RANDALL  ('Ann.  d.  Phys.,'  33,  p.  741),  8.  to 
SAUNDERS  ('  Astrophys.  Journ.,'  20,  p.  188). 

In  1905  FOWLER  ('Astrophys.  Journ. ,'  21,  p.  84)  discovered  the  lines  in  the  F 
series  for  Sr,  beginning  with  K.R.'s  4892,  adding  two  sets  of  his  own  observations 
and  "also  the  two  connected  triplets  given  in  the  table.  But  he  attempted  to  combine 
them  all  in  one  formula.  The  disarranged  triplet  for  m  =  3  is  assigned  in  the  text 
above  from  K.R.  and  LKHMANN  ('  Ann.  d.  Phys.,'  8,  p.  647).  In  the  same  volume 
SAUNDERS  ('  Astrophys.  Journ.,'  21,  p.  195)  added  the  last  line  and  gave  a  similar 
series  for  Ca,  commencing  with  4586.  The  measures  inserted  in  the  table,  however, 
are  from  later  observations  by  BARNES  (Bs.)  ('  Astrophys.  Journ.,'  30,  p.  14). 
SAUNDERS  also  suggested  a  corresponding  series  for  Ba  in  which  the  separations  are 
larger  than  those  of  the  series  assigned  in  the  text.  It  is  possible  they  may  form  a 
similar  series  connected  with  the  enhanced  series.  The  lines  for  RaF  and  allied  sets 
are  assigned  also  in  the  text  above. 

The  F  lines  for  Mg,  Zn,  Cd,  Hg,  Al,  and  Tl  are  all  due  to  PASCHEN  ('  Ann.  d. 
Phys.,'  29,  p.  651,  and  35,  p.  860).  In  Hg,  however,  he  assigns  17195  to  a  combination 
line,  whereas  in  the  text  above  it  is  assigned  to  F,. 


[Notes,  September  2,  1913.] 

Note  1  -Since  the  present  communication  was  read  Messrs.  FOWLER  and  REYNOLDS  ('Roy  Soc.  Proc., 
89  p.  137)  have  published  more  accurate  and  extended  measurements  of  the  series,  and  other  linen 
The  limit  of  the  D  or  S  series  appears  to  be  somewhat  higher  than  that  adopted  in  thu  Table  I 
and  the  table  will  require  the  limit  to  be  slightly  raised  to  bring  in  multiples  of  A  for  the  order  d 
With  FOWFER  and  REYNOLD'S  limit  the  mantissas  show  rising  values  for  the  first  few  o 
decreasing    an  effect  which  has  been  explained  in  the  text  in  similar  cases  by  a  collateral  d.splaccracn 
the  limit  after  a  particular  order.     If  the  limit  be  taken  to  be  39757-78  (i.e.,  6-7  higher  than  in  t 
there  results  an  order  difference  of  4A3  between  m  =  2  and  3,  and  equal  mantissa,  nfwrwar 
»  =  9,  when  there  is  a  sudden  change  to  a  rising.     If  the  limit  is  now  raised  by  unUy  for  t 
mantissa  can  again  be  all  equal.     Now,  a  displacement  of  3  on  the  limit  makes  a  change  o 

3  H  2 


420  DR.   W.   M.   HICKS :    A  CRITICAL   STUDY   OF   SPECTRAL  'SERIES. 

the  change  can  be  explained  l>y  a  collateral  change  of  (  -  3)  D  (  *)  for  m  =  10-12.     The  scheme  is  then  as 

follows : — 

2-828063      (20) +  10 

*\ 

3-829715      (79) -36 
4-829715    (190) +  9 
5-829715    (362) +  58 
6-829715    (626) -580 
7-829715    (945) -173 
8-829715  (2300) +  63 
9-829715  (3200)+ 1373 
f  10 -8297          (44) -16 
Collaterals  with  j  1 1  •  8297          (57)  -  8 
(-S)D(oo)    1  12-8297          (78) -5 
[13-8297          (92)  +  8 

The  arrangement  is  seen  to  be  exceedingly  simple.  The  value  for  m  =  I  has  been  omitted  as  the 
evidence  seems  strong  that  Mg  conforms  to  the  Zn  type  and  has  no  D(l).  If,  however,  it  is  retained,  it 
is  now  15A2  below  that  for  m  =  2.  The  values  of  Ao  are  so  small  that  Mg  can  give  no  positive  evidence 
for  any  arrangement.  This  is  evidenced  by  the  changed  arrangements  called  for  by  more  accurate  values. 
The  measures  of  FOWLER  and  REYNOLDS  for  the  D  lines  are  here  adduced  in  order  to  complete 
Appendix  II. : — 

3097-03  3093-09  3091-19 

2851-76  2848-54  2846-88 

2736-63  2733-64  2732-16 

2672-53  2669-66  2668-24 

2632-98  2630-14  2628-73 

2606-73  2603-98  2602-59 

2588-37  2585-63  2584-32 

2575-02  2575-30  2570-96 

2565-00  2562-30  2560-96 

2557-29  2554-70 

2551-22  2548-56 

Note  2,  p.  357. — The  effect  of  positive  collaterals  on  D  ( ex)  for  m  =  5,  6,  7  is  to  diminish  the  separations 
of  the  triplets,  so  that  from  m  =  5  onwards  they  would  show  diminishing  values.  It  is  interesting  to  note 
that  the  observations  bear  this  out. 

Note  3,  p.  380. — The  F  series  of  the  alkalies.  In  K.  the  denominator  3-007542  has  its  mantissa 
1-007542,  and  this  is  14725(250  +  ?)  above  that  of  K.F.  (3),  and  5A  =  14700.  This  suggests  that  if 
K.F.  (3)  has  a  denominator  3  +  d,  that  of  Fu(2)  is  2  +  d,  and  the  1182  -9  (W.N.)  is  Fi2(2)  with  a  satellite 
difference  28  and  1346-3  is  the  collateral  Fn  (2)  (5A).  In  Rb  3-001138  has  its  mantissa  13289(430  +  ?) 
above  that  of  RbF  (3)  and  A  =  12935,  so  that  should  have  a  similar  arrangement  to  that  in  K.  and  2156 
would  correspond  to  Flt  (2)  (A). 

Note  4,  p.  383.— CaF  (2).  The  line  with  wave  number  16203-40  is  possibly  the  Fn  and  F12  combined. 
If  so,  FIS  is  16202-66  and  is  -74  behind  16203-40,  and  the  satellite  might  have  displaced  the  observation 
towards  itself  from  16203-66.  The  actual  separation  would  easily  be  1-00  corresponding  to  a  difference 
2S,  a  usual  F  satellite  difference.  16024-72  would  be  1-06  on  the  other  side  and  would  correspond  to  a 
collateral  forming  on  the  violet  side. 


[     421     ] 


IX.  On  the  Self-inductance  of  Circular  Coil*  of  Rectangular  Section, 
Ity  T.  H.  LYLE,  M.A.,  Sc.D.,  F.K.S. 

Received  February  27,— Read  March  13,  1913. 

As  an  approximate  formula  for  the  calculation  of  the  self-inducfcince  of  a  coil  of 
rectangular  section, 

L  =  47r«najlog^-2} 

was  first  given  by  MAXWELL,*  where  a  is  the  mean  radius  and  >•  the  geometric  mean 
distance  of  the  section  of  the  coil  from  itself,  the  current  being  supposed  to  be 
uniformly  distributed  over  the  section. 

In  the  following  paper  it  will  be  shown  that  the  same  formula  will  give  the  self- 
inductance  to  any  order  of  accuracy  when  in  it  are  substituted  for  a  and  r  the  mean 
radius  and  the  G.M.D.  respectively,  each  suitably  modified  by  small  quantities  which 
depend  on  a  and  on  the  section  of  the  coil,  provided,  of  course,  that  the  series  for  L  is 
convergent. 

Tables  will  be  given  by  means  of  which  the  modified  values  of  a  and  r  for  any  coil 
of  rectangular  section  can  be  found,  and  which,  when  substituted  in  the  above  formula, 
will  give  L  correct  to  the  fourth  order,  uniform  current  density  over  the  section  being 
assumed. 

1.  For  the  purpose  of  this  paper  the  mutual  inductance  of  two  coaxal  circles  can 
best  be  obtained  after  WEiNSTElNt  by  substituting  in  MAXWELL'S  exact  elliptic 
integral  formula! 

M  =  Waft  {(§-*)  F- fE 

I  \  «  /  "• 

the  series  expressions  for  F  and  E  in  terms  of  the  complementary  modulus  V. 
Thus  we  obtain 


which  is  rapidly  convergent  when  /•',  the  ratio  of  the  least  to  the  greatest  distance 
between  the  circles,  is  small. 

*  '  Elect,  and  Mag.,'  vol.  II.,  §706. 

t  '  WiED.  Ann.,'  21,  p.  344,  1884. 

J  '  Elect,  and  Mag.,'  vol.  II.,  §  701. 


VOL.  cexiir.-A  505.  Pubiuhed  -I—*'  J""*  31'  101*- 


422 


DR.  T.  R.  LYLE   ON   THE  SELF-INDUCTANCE   OF 


Let  these  two  circles  be  filaments  A  and  B  in  the  rectangular  conductor  whose 
section  is  PQRS,  fig.  1.  Then,  if  x  and  y  be  the  co-ordinates  of  B  relative  to  axes 
through  A  parallel  to  the  sides  of  the  rectangle, 


and  on  substitution  in  the  above  we  obtain,  as  ROSA  and  COHEN*  have  done, 


y 


2a        16aa 
=  M0  say, 

where  a  is  the  radius  of  the  circle  A  and  i^  = 


48«* 


6144a4 


p 

2 

A 

B- 

x  y 

> 

, 

;.. 
j 

V* 

4 

-x- 

XT- 

r> 

Fig.  1. 

If  the  co-ordinates  of  the  A  circle,  referred  to  axes  through  the  centre  of  the 
rectangle,  be  X  and  Y,  then  a  in  the  above  expression  for  M  becomes  a  +  Y  where  a 
now  and  in  what  follows  is  the  mean  radius  of  the  coil. 

This  substitution  is  most  easily  carried  out  by  aid  of  TAYLOR'S  Theorem.  Thus  the 
complete  expression  for  M  is  given  by 


M  =  M0+  Y         +  7+&c. 

da       1.2  da2 


1  Bull,  Bureau  Standards,'  vol.  2,  p.  364,  1900, 


CIRCULAR  COILS  OF  RECTANGULAR  SECTION.  423 

2.  It   is  well  known  that  the  self-inductance  of  a  single  circular  conductor  with 
rectangular  section  for  uniform  current  density  is  given  by 


i    ffc    el*    ri«-Y    ri*-x 

~        I      I 

Mr  J  -jc  J  -a*  J  -S«-Y  J  -ifc-x 


and  for  a  coil  of  71  turns  is  n"  times  this  if  MAXWELL'S  correction*  for  space  between 
the  wires  be  neglected,  l>  being  the  breadth  and  c  the  radial  depth  of  the  rectangle. 

The  evaluation  of  this  definite  integral,  even  for  the  second  order  terms,  has 
presented  considerable  difficulties.  The  first  correct  result  to  this  order  was  that 
given  by  WKiNSTEiN.t  So  far  as  I  am  aware  no  one  has  published  a  determination  of 
it  to  the  fourth  order.  By  a  method  indicated  in  the  appendix  to  this  paper  the 
integration  can  be  carried  out  to  the  fourth  order  without  difficulty  and  to  still  higher 
orders  if  desired. 

Thus  the  following  expression  for  L  has  been  obtained 


211 .  3  .  5  .  T. 

23  6fr4— 7&V  , 

or  H .  2  .  w 

28  21 

3659064-20356V-11442( 

23 .3.5.7 
in  which 


a  =  mean  radius,    1>  =  breadth,    c.  =  depth,     d  =  jV  +  c1  =  diagonal  of  the  rectangle. 


3.  If  r  be  the  G.M.D.  of  the  rectangle  from  itself,  it  is  well  known  that 

log  r  =  log  d—  <{> 


where 


*  -Elect,  and  Mag,'  vol.  II,  §  693.     ROSA  (see  •Bull.  Bureau  Standards/  vol.  3,  p.  37,  1907)  ha, 
greatly  improved  on  MAXWEr.L's  correction. 
'  t  '  WiED.  Ann,'  21,  p.  329,  1884. 


424  DR.  T.  R.  LYLE   ON   THE  SELF-INDUCTANCE  OF 

Substituting  for  d  in  terms  of  r  and  </>  in  the  above  expression  for  L  we  obtain 

aT,      8a        ,  d2  \  Sa        1      d4  \  8a        ]~| 

L  =  47r«n2    log--  -2  +  -5    ^2log  -  -  +g,[  +      J  jo.log--  +  ?4     , 

L          "  it    l  ?  j        ct     (.  )  JJ 

where 


= 
P*      25.3 


4-2085^V2-  11442c4 


2-15.7 
4.  If 

A  =  a(  l+ml^7.+m,2 

\  a  a 

d* 


:! 
a"         a          a  / 


!,  »(2,  v(1;  ?ta>  Jls  can  t*e  determined  so  that 


shall  differ  very  little  from  the  value  for  L  given  in  §  3. 

After  substituting  for  A  and  R  in  the  above  and  expanding  in  a  series  in  d*/a3,  the 
first  three  terms  of  the  expansion  are  identified  with  the  corresponding  terms  of  L  in 
the  usual  way,  and  in  addition,  the  coefficient  of  the  fourth  term  of  the  expansion,  that 
is  the  coefficient  of  def(t*,  is  equated  to  zero.  The  n3  term  in  R  enables  this  to  be  done, 
with  the  result  that  a  closer  agreement  is  obtained  between  the  proposed  formula  and 
that  in  §  3. 

Thus 


=p4,  n2  =  - 


Hence,  when  A  and  R  have  been  so  determined  the  formula 


will  give  the  self-inductance  of  the  coil  correct  to  the  fourth  order. 


CIRCULAR  COILS  OF  RECTANGULAR  8FX7TION.  425 

It  will  be  seen  that  in  the  application  of  this  formuk  the  coefficient  »,  neecl  rarely 

xL     It  ^becomes   important,  however,  when  the  mean  radius  is  leas  than  the 

diagonal  of  the  section  and  especially  in  this  case  when   the  section   is  square  or 

1 1 < '.'  M  ly  so. 

It  is  obvious  that  in  a  similar  way  to  the  above,  series  for  A  and  R  could  be  obtained 
which,  when  substituted  in  the  proposed  formula  would  make  it  practically  equivalent 
to  L,  no  matter  to  what  order  the  integration,  if  performed,  had  been  carried  out 

5.  In  order  to  render  convenient  the  practical  application  of  the  above  formula  to 
termination  of  self-inductances  the  following  tables*  have  been  prepared. 

TABUS  I. 


G.M.D.  =  r.    rf»  =  A^e2. 

c   I 

T  or  -• 

.A  __  ]{x(f 

r 

o   c 

r 

•b  +  e 

o-oo 

1-5 

0-223130 

0-025 

1-474734 

0-223328 

0-05 

1-451005 

0-223455 

o-io 

1-407566 

0-223599 

0-15 

1-368975 

0-223664 

0-20 

1-334799 

0-223686 

0-25 

1-304680 

0-223686 

0-30 

1-278284 

0-223675 

0-35 

1-255312 

0-223658 

0-40 

1-235461 

0-223639 

0-45 

1-218448 

0-223619 

0-50 

1-203998 

0-223601 

0-55 

1-191853 

0  •  22358  1 

0-60 

1-1817G8 

0-223570 

0-65 

1-173516 

0-223558 

0-70 

1-166888 

0-223548 

0-75 

1-161691 

0-223540 

0-80 

1-157752 

0-223534 

0-85 

1-154914 

0-223530 

0-90 

1-153034 

0-223527 

0-95 

1-151987 

0-223525 

1-00 

1-151660 

0-223525 

Table  I.  contains  (l)  values  of  ^>,  that  is  of  log,—,  for  different  values  of  the  ratio 

r 

b/c  or  c/b  (2)  values  of  the  ratio  r/b  +  c  for  different  values  of  b/c.     It  will  be  noticed 
how  nearly  r  the  G.M.D.  of  a  rectangle  from  itself  is  proportional  to  the  sum  of  the 

*  All  the  tables  given  in  this  paper  have  been  calculated  with  the  greatest  care  by  the  aid  of  a 
"  millionaire  "  calculating  machine.  Each  separate  series  of  numbers,  not  only  the  final  series  but  every 
intermediate  series  that  had  to  be  determined,  was  calculated  at  least  twice,  the  end  terms  and  one  or  two 
intermediate  terms  of  each  series  were  carefully  re-checked,  and  each  series  then  examined  by  taking 
successive  differences. 

VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  3   I 


426 


DK.  T.  R.  LYLE   ON   THE   SELF-INDUCTANCE  OF 


sides.  These  figures  will  enable  the  G.M.D.  for  values  of  c/b  or  b/c,  intermediate  to 
those  given  in  the  table,  and  consequently  the  first  or  important  term  of  L  for  such 
intermediate  values  to  be  obtained  with  great  accuracy. 

Table  II.-  contains  the  values  of  the  coefficients  m,,  m2,  nl}  n.it  nx,  for  thick  coils,  that 
is  for  ones  in  which  b  is  greater  than  c  for  different  values  of  the  ratio  c/b,  and 
Table  III.  contains  the  values  of  the  same  coefficients  for  thin  coils,  that  is  for  ones  in 
which  b  is  less  than  c  for  different  values  of  the  ratio  b/c, 

TABLE  II. 


c 

b' 

10'2Wi. 

10%, 

10%. 

10%,. 

10"%. 

o-oo 

3-12500 

-9-766 

0-78125 

-8-647 

-  6-9 

0-025 

3-12370 

-9-746 

0-69934 

-8-179 

-  8-2 

0-05 

3-11980. 

-9-688 

0-61606 

-7-663 

-  9-7 

o-io 

3-10437 

-9-461 

0-44541 

-6-505 

-12-6 

0-15 

3-07916 

-9-094 

+  0-26934 

-5-202 

-15-7 

0-20 

3-04487 

-8-604 

+  0-08919 

-3-795 

-18-9 

0-25 

3-00245 

-8-011 

-0-09342 

-2-326 

-22-1 

0-30 

2-95298 

-7-340 

-0-27664 

-0-838 

-25-2 

0-35 

2-89764 

-6-614 

-0-45856 

+  0-630 

-28-0 

0-40 

2-83764 

-5-857 

-0-63754 

+  2-045 

-30-6 

0-45 

2-77417 

-5-090 

-0-81198 

3-378 

-32-8 

0-50 

2-70833 

-4-332 

-0-98060 

4-610 

-34-7 

0-55 

2-64166 

-3-596 

-1-14240 

5-727 

-36-1 

0-60 

2-57353 

-J2-895 

-1-29662 

6  •  725 

-37-2 

0-65 

2-50622 

-2-237 

-1-44274 

7-600 

-37-8 

0-70 

2-43988 

-1-626 

-1-58048 

8-356 

-38-2 

0-75 

2-37500 

-1-066 

-1-70975 

8-999 

-38-2 

0-80 

2-31199 

-0-556 

-1-83060 

9-536 

-37-9 

0-85 

2-25115 

-0-097 

-1-94321 

9-978 

-37-5 

0-90 

2-19268 

+  0-314 

-2-04787 

10-333 

-36-8 

0-95 

2-13672 

+  0-680 

-2-14491 

10-611 

-3o-9 

1-00 

2-08333 

+  1-004 

-2-23473 

10-824 

-35-0 

1-05 

2-03255 

+  1-289 

-2-31773 

10-978 

-33-9 

It  will  have  been  noticed  that  the  coefficient  mY  and  ma  are  algebraic  and  can  be 
easily  calculated  for  any  value  of  c/b.     Those  in  the  tables  are  given  for  convenience. 
6.  If  the  formula  for  L  given  in  §  2  be  written  in  the  form 

a  [7,          d2  ,       d*\,      Sa     ,  ,  ,  <P  ,  ,  cZ4l 
L  =  t-ran*   f  l+m,  -,+m,  -Jlog  -r-^+Z,  -2+4  -,  L 

L  \  d  \JU  I  'ji  C*  C*  _J 

tables  giving  mlt  m2,  Z0,  llt  and  12,  for  different  values  of  c/b  would  also  render  easy 
the  computation  of  the  self  inductances  of  coils.  Such  tables  have  been  computed  from 
WEINSTEIN'S  formula  by  STEFAN,*  but  he  is  in  error  in  thinking  that  the  second  order 
coefficient  has  the  same  value  for  a  given  value  of  b/c  in  a  thin  coil  as  it  has  for  the 

WIED.  Ann.,'  22,  p.  113,  1884. 


.CIRCULAR  COILS  OF  RECTANGULAR  SFXTTION. 


127 


same  value  of  c/b  in  a  thick  coil.     The  second  order  coefficients  he  gives  are  correct  for 
thick  coils. 

In  using  the  above  formula  with  tables  for  the  computation  of  L  for  valum  of  r/h 
or  b/c  intermediate  to  those  given  in  the  tables,  the  value  of  /0  which  is  part  of  the 
large  or  first  order  term  will  have  to  be  obtained  by  interpolation,  whereas  in  the 

TABLE  III. 


b 

c 

lOtai. 

Win*. 

10*11,. 

10*11* 

lOS,. 

o-oo 

1-04167 

2-387 

-3-21180        6-073 

+  0-5 

0-025 

1-04297        2-391 

-3-23737         6-134 

+  0-6 

0-05 

1-04686        2-403 

-3-25967. 

6-214 

+  0-5 

o-io 

1-06229 

2-451 

-3-29420 

6-430 

+  .0-1 

0-15 

1-08751 

2-524 

-3-31479 

6-724 

-  0-6 

0-20       1-12179 

2-614 

-3-32107 

7-090 

-  1-7 

0-25       1-16421 

2-711 

-3-31313 

7-513 

-  3-2 

0-30       1-21368 

2-806 

-3-29150 

7-978 

-  5-1 

0-35 

1-26902 

2-886 

-3-25703 

8-463 

-  7-3 

0-40 

1-32902 

2-943 

-3-21091 

8-949 

-  9-8 

0-45 

1-39250 

2-969 

-3-15447 

9-414 

-12-4 

0-50 

1-45833 

2-960 

-3-08918 

9-845 

-15-0 

0-55 

1-52551 

2-912 

-3-01651 

10-226 

-17-7 

0-60 

1-59313 

2-824 

-2-93794 

10-548 

-20-3 

0-65 

1-66044 

2-697 

-2-85483 

10-805 

-22-8 

0-70 

1-72678 

2-534 

-2-76844 

10-994 

-25-2 

0-75 

1-79167 

2-337 

-2-67990 

11-115 

-27-4 

0-80 

1-85468 

2-111 

-2-59020 

11-171 

-29-3 

0-85 

1-91552 

1-861 

-2-50019        11-164 

-  31  •  1 

0-90 

1-97399 

1-590 

-2-41057 

11-100 

-32-6 

0-95 

2  •  02995 

1-303 

-2-32192 

10-  98.-! 

-33-9 

1-00 

2-08333 

1-004 

-2-23473        10-824 

-35-0 

1-05 

2-13412 

0-696 

-2-14940 

10-624 

-36-2 

method  previously  given,  the  whole  of  the  first  order  term  can  be  easily  got  with  great 
accuracy,  by  making  use  of  the  nearly  constant  ratio  of  r  to  b  +  c  indicated  by  the 
figures  given  in  the  third  column  of  Table  I. 

The  coefficients  /„,  /„  /,,,  occurred  in  the  computation  of  Tables  I.,  II.,  and  III.,  m, 
and  ma  are  the  same  as  in  these  tables,  and  are  in  any  case  algebraic  as 


m,  = 


nt«  = 


2".  3».  5 


Table  IV.  gives  the  values  of  /,„  /„  and  /,  for  different  values  of  the  ratio  c'b  for 
thick  coils,  and  of  b/e  for  thin  coils. 

3  I  2 


428 


DR.  T.  R.  LYLE   ON   THE   SELF-INDUCTANCE   OF 


TABLE  IV. 


For  both  thick  and 
thin  coils. 

For  thick  coils. 

For  thin  coils. 

c        b 

T  OT~- 

1)           C 

k. 

e, 

V 

MWh 

10«/2. 

b 

c 

10% 

10422. 

o-oo 

0-500000 

o-oo 

0-78125 

6-510 

o-oo 

3-73264 

4-167 

0-025 

0-525266 

0-025 

0-78358 

6-490 

0-025 

3-73250 

4-161 

0-05 

0-548995 

0-05 

0-79098 

6-427 

0-05 

3-73181 

4-143 

o-io 

0-592434 

o-io 

0-81983 

6-184 

o-io 

3-72716 

4-058 

0-15 

0-631025 

0-15 

0-86679 

5-794 

0-15 

3-71605 

3-897 

0-20 

0-665201    ' 

0-20 

0-93023 

5-283  '. 

0-20 

3-69664 

3-655 

0-25 

0-695320 

0-25 

1-00821 

4-677 

0-25 

3-66784 

3-336 

0-30 

0-721716 

0-30 

1-09841 

4-010 

0-30 

3-62925 

2-951 

0-35 

0-744688 

0-35 

1-19836 

3-313 

0-35 

3-58103 

2-516 

0-40 

0-764539 

0-40 

1-30570 

2-614 

0-40 

3-52385 

2-050 

0-45 

0-781552 

0-45 

1-41799 

1-940 

0-45 

3-45866 

1-572 

0-50 

0-796002 

0-50 

1-53310 

1-311 

0-50 

3-38668 

1-099 

0-55 

0-808147 

0-55 

1-64911 

0-740 

0-55 

3-30919 

0-648 

0-60 

0-818232 

0-60 

1-76440 

+  0-238 

0-60 

3-22752 

+  0-231 

0-65 

0-826484 

0-65 

1-87761 

-0-191 

0-65 

3-14294 

-0-143 

0-70 

0-833112 

0-70 

1-98767 

-0-546 

0-70 

3-05662 

-0-468 

0-75 

0-838309 

0-75 

2-09376 

-0-829 

0-75 

2-96960 

-0-740 

0-80 

0-842248 

0-80 

2-19532 

-1-044 

0-80 

2-88278 

-0-959 

0-85 

0-845086 

0-85 

2-29194           -1-197 

0-85 

2-79693 

-1-127 

0-90 

0-846966 

0-90 

2-38342           -1-294 

0-90 

2-71265 

-1-245 

0-95 

0-848013 

0-95           2-46966 

-1-342 

0-95 

2-63045 

-1-318 

1-00 

0-848340 

1-00           2-55069           -1-349 

1-00 

2-55069 

-1-349 

1-05 

0-848044 

1-05 

2-62659           -1-320 

1-05 

2-47369 

-1-344 

7.  The  only  available  means  of  testing  the  above  methods  of  computing  self- 
inductances  and  of  finding  the  limit  outside  which  they  are  practically  reliable  is  to 
compare  the  results  they  give  with  those  given  by  LOBENZ'S*  exact  elliptic  integral 
formula  for  the  self-inductance  of  a  current  sheet  solenoid,  which  is 


m 

3    d?   (     F  k3 

where  a  is  the  radius,  d  the  length  of  the  solenoid,  and 


. 
—  1 


Thus  consider  the  case  of  a  solenoid  whose  length  is  twice  its  radius. 
Here 


*  '  WIED.  Ann.,'  7,  p.  161,  1879, 


CIRCULAR  COILS  OF  RECTANGULAR  SECTION.  429 

and  from  Table  II. 

A  =  (1  +  4xOU3125-  16x0-0009766)  a, 
=  ri09375a. 

R  =  (1  +  4  x  0-0078125-16  x  0-0008647-64  x  0-0000069)  r, 

=  l'016973r. 
so 

,=  log. 


. 

"1  '016973 

(where  <f>  is  given  in  Table  I.) 

=  log,  4  +  ^  +  0-086965, 
=  2-973259, 


and 


(8A 
log^-2    =  4 irax  T07970. 
L\ 


LORENZ'S  exact  formula  gives 

L  =  4Tax  T08137. 

Thus  the  error  in  this  case  is  1  part  in  650. 

When  the  comparison  is  made  in  less  extreme  cases  we  find  the  agreement  with  the 
Lorenz  formula  very  close. 

Thus  when  the  length  of  the  solenoid  is  equal  to  its  radius  («)  either  of  the  methods 
of  this  paper  give 

L  =  207453a, 
while  LORENZ'S  formula  gives 

L  =  207463a, 

showing  an  error  of  1  part  in  20,000,  and  when  the  length  of  the  solenoid  is  half  the 
radius  we  obtain 

L  =  28'85332rt, 
as  against  the  Lorenz  value 

L  =  28'85335a, 

showing  an  error  of  only  about  1  part  in  1,000,000. 


430  DR.  T.  R.  LYLE  ON  THE  SELF-INDUCTANCE  OF 


APPENDIX  I. 

In  order  to  determine  L  to  the  fourth  order  we  have  seen  that  it  is  necessary  to 
evaluate  the  definite  integral 


fie     rift     /•'•"-*     rjA-x 

MdxdydXd\T 

J  -!JC.  I  _?.A  J-Jc-Y  J-^A-X 


where 

M  =  P  +  QY+RY'+SY-'+TY4, 

P,  Q,  R,  S,  and  T  being  functions  of  x  and  y. 

If  we  proceed  in  the  ordinary  way  by  putting  in  the  limits  after  each  integration 
the  expression  becomes  very  cumbrous  on  account  of  the  nature  of  some  of  the 
functions  (log  and  tan"1)  with  which  we  have  to  deal. 

By  the  method  to  be  explained  below  all  the  integration  will  be  carried  out  first 
and  the  limits  introduced  in  an  easy  and  symmetrical  way  at  the  finish. 

1  .  Dealing  first  with  P,  the  term  independent  of  Y,  if 


y  =  6  (xy), 
the  result,  with  limits  introduced,  of  the  integrations  with  respect  to  x  and  y  will  bo 

where 

y  =  IC_Y          y.  =  — fc— Y. 
We  have  now  to  evaluate  four  definite  integrals  of  which  the  first  is 


Changing  the  variables  to  xt  and  «/i  and  the  limits  accordingly,  this  integral  is 
equal  to 

e(xly1)dxldyi 

Jc  •>!> 


where 

<j>  (xy]  =  |j  6  (xy)  d.c  dy  =  Jjjj  P 

Dealing  in  the  same  way  with  the  three  remaining  integrals 
-f"    T    0(xM)dXdY,       -\*    [''    9(x.4h)dXdY,        and       T    f"*    6(x2y2 

J_i<:J_iJ  J_JcJ_i6  J_;CJ_JJ 


CIRCULAR  COILS  OF  RECTANGULAR  SECTION.  431 

we  find  that  they  become 

}  ^efayJdXidfo,         £j"  ^(x^d^dy,        and         f    j"   6(sj/,)d*tdi/, 
respectively,  which  are  equal  to 


and 

*(0,0) 
respectively,  where 

0  (xy)  has  the  same  meaning  as  before. 
Hence,  if 


fk     r}6     rk-Y     pj*-x 

J-Sc  J-}t  J-Je-Y  J-Jt-X 

is  equal  to 


This  expression,  obtained  from  the  function  ^>(a;«/)  by  substituting  in  it  b,  c,  —h,  —c, 
0,  0  in  the  way  indicated,  will,  in  what  follows,  be  designated  by 


2.  As  an  illustration  of  the  above  I  will  indicate  the  process  as  applied  to  the  simplest 
term  in  P  involving  log  (a^+y2). 

Thus  to  obtain 

fk     (•»*     rk-Y     rJA-x 

J_JC  J_i»  J-k-Y  J-J6-X 

we  find  by  simple  integrations  that 


By  inspection  it  is  seen  that 
0(00)  = 

2*(±6,  ±c)  = 


0  (0,  c)  =  *  (0,  -c)  =  -  |-  log  c". 


432  DR.  T.  R.  LYLE  ON  THE  SELF-INDUCTANCE  OF 

Hence  the  definite  integral  above  is  equal  to 


s  ,    -\      V  i       &2  +  e2       <?   ^       &a  +  c"     25      III.        ,  <•      <•          .l\~] 

+<r)-  6?  log  IT  -  w  log  —  -T  +  a  (c  tan  i  +  b  tim  ;)j 

The  above  is  the  well-known  definite  integral  used  for  determining  the  G.M.D.  of 
a  rectangle  from  itself. 
3.  To  determine 


between  the  given  limits. 
If 

6(xy)  =  II  Qdxdy, 
the  result  of  the  integrations  with  respect  to  x  and  y  will  now  be 

Y{o(xM)-e\ 


where  xu  yl}  x2,  y%  have  the  same  significations  as  before. 
We  have  now  to  evaluate  four  integrals  of  the  type 


T    T    Y 

J  -\c  J  -|i 

Proceeding  as  in  §  1,  these,  affected  by  their  proper  signs,  become 
(ic-f/OH^O^i^-f    f  ($c+ya)  6(x,y2}dx^dy., 

•Ic  Jb  J  —c  Jli 

+  (^c-t/i)0(x2y1)dx2di/l-\      \ 

•>c  J  -b  J  -c  J  -b 

so  that,  if  in  this  case 


*'  M  =  J  V  dy  jjj  Q  dx-  dy, 
and 


-<!>  (-6,  -P)  +  20  (0,  -c)-20  (0,  c), 
then 


between  the  given  limits  is  equal  to 

where  2  has  the  signification  given  to  it  in  §  1  . 


CIRCULAR  COILS  OF   RECTANGULAR  SECTION.  433 

4.   In  :,  similar  way  it  can  1*  8|1OWII  t|,at 


tetween  the  given  limits  is  equal  to 


where,  in  this  case 


and  that 


between  the  given  limits  is  equal  to 


where,  in  this  case, 


The  result  of  integration  can  now  be  easily  written  out  for  integrations  involving 
higher  powers  of  Y. 

5.   Before    proceeding    with    the    integrations    it    is   advisable    to   have   prepared 
beforehand  a  table  giving 


and 

faftan-'^f/ic 
.'  x 

from  n  =  0  to  it  ,  =  7. 

If  this  be  done,  and  the  method  indicated  above  followed,  the  work  presents  little 
difficulty  and  is  not  veiy  tedious. 

VOL.  CCXIH.  —  A.  3   K 


434  DK.  T.  It  LYLE  ON  THE  SKLF-IXDUCTAWK   OF 

APPENDIX   II. 

(Added  October  1,  1913.) 

Since  writing  the  above  I  have  determined  the  sixth  order  term  of  the  series  for  L. 

In  order  to  do  this  it  was  necessary  to  extend  to  the  sixth  order  MAXWELL'S  series 
formula  (see  §  l)  for  M,  the  mutual  inductance  of  two  unequal  coaxal  circles  which 
ROSA  and  COHEN*  had  already  extended  to  the  fifth  order. 

Thus 


r    {       2a       2*.  a?         25.  a' 
15,r4-42xy-17?/4      4  5.x '//- 3  (.).*•-// 
210.a4  2".  a6 

35s8-345a!V+ 45igy  +  89/1 
214.  a" 


2.  a       24.a2       24.3.a:i 
93a:4-534xV-19?/4 


2u.3.a*  212.  3.  5.  a5 

1235x6-17445a:y+12045.ry-7371j/r| 

When  in  M  we  substitute,  as  explained  in  §  1,  a  +  Y  for  a,  the  term  of  the  sixth 
order  in  the  variables  x,  y,  and  Y  becomes  equal  to  U,  where 

U  =  p  +  q  Y  +  ?-Y2 + SY3 + *  Y4 + M  Y5 + t'Y", 
in  which 


p  =  ^a  |-  log 


1235X-"-  17445./V  +  12045^y-7371i/>i 
2*.  3. 5.0* 

g  =  4^ai          XU+V  r/ -log-*  +  :         X!/<>ii\    f'% ~f 

^.Cc  /  A     *  D  •  v  •  Ci  J 


4         -.  , 

»1)  g        " 


2».«1)  g  r  "  2".  a6  J' 


?•         25.3.a6 

*  I  24.  a8    °ff  7         26.3.a«  J 
n  =  4-rra . 


=    47T«   . 


2  .  5  .  a« 

1 
2.  3.  5.  a"' 

*  '  Bull.  Bureau  Standards,'  2,  p.  364,  1906. 


CIRCULAR  COILS  OF  RECTANGULAR  SECTION.  435 

The  term  of  the  sixth  order  in  the  series  for  L  is  the  value  of  the  integral 


between  the  specified  limits,  and  I  have  found  it  to  be  equal  to, 
2".  «  *5.  7    a5  [(525y-161OfrV  +  7706V  +  108c»)  log  ^ 


+  (^jjf-  V-3220&V+2240&V4)  ti, 

OKQ  /c  7 

•Ijj.  c«r  _  2"  (  |  ft"  _  46  V  +  1  6V  j  IT, 


2161453    ,,      617423  M,       8329    M  4  .    4308631 
"  23.3.5.7       ~  271^5  6     ~2T3~56     +  2'.3.5.7     j 

in  which  w,  c,  w,  and  ti  have  the  significations  assigned  to  them  in  §  2. 

The  method  of  integration  indicated  in  this  paper  renders  the  determination  of  L  in 
series  form  comparatively  easy  for  the  special  cases  of  a  solenoid  (c/b  =  o),  and  a  flat 
circular  ring  coil  (b/c  =  0),  uniform  current  density  being  assumed. 

Thus  COFFIN'S  formula*  for  a  solenoid  can  be  easily  obtained,  and  KAYLKwnt  and 
NIVEN'S  formula  for  a  coil  whose  axial  dimension  (b)  is  zero  can  be  extended  to  the 
sixth  order,  giving 

[7.  c3  lie4  103«*  8a 

L  =  4^'a  11  +  j—tf  +  2».3..5.0«  +  2'«.3.5.7. 


43cr  c4  429H57i><-'1 

7.  3*.  a3     2s.  3  .  V.  a4     2".  3'.  5'.  7'.  «"J  ' 


which  can  also  be  obtained  by  putting  b  =  0  in  the  general  formula  obtained  above 
for  L,  and  remembering  that  when  b/c  =  0,  o  =  1,  and  w'  =  1. 


*  'Bull.  Bureau  Standards,'  2,  p.  113,  1906. 
t  RATLKIOH,  '  Collected  Papers,'  2,  p.  15. 


3   K  2 


[     437 


X.  A  Method  of  Measuring  th,-  Pressure  Produced  in  the  Detonation  of 
Explosives  or  by  the  Impact  of  Bullets. 

/>'//  BERTRAM  HOPKINSON,  F.R.S. 
Received  Octoter  17,— Read  November  27,  1913. 

THE  determination  of  the  actual  pressures  produced  by  a  blow  such  as  that  of  a 
rifle  bullet  or  by  the  detonation  of  high  explosives  is  a  problem  of  much  scii-ntitir 
and  practical  interest  but  of  considerable  difficulty.  It  is  easy  to  measure  the  transfer 
of  momentum  associated  with  the  blow,  which  is  equal  to  the  average  pressure 
developed,  multiplied  by  the  time  during  which  it  acts,  but  the  separation  of  theae 
two  factors  has  not  hitherto  been  effected.  The  direct  determination  of  a  force  acting 
for  a  few  hundred-thousandths  of  i»  second  presents  difficulties  which  may  perhaps  be 
called  insuperable,  but  the  measurement  of  the  other  factor,  the  duration  of  the  blow, 
is  more  feasible.  In  the  case  of  impacts  such  as  those  of  spheres  or  rods  moving  at 
moderate  velocities  the  time  of  contact  can  be  determined  electrically  with  pomndambk 
accuracy.*  The  present  paper  contains  an  account  of  a  method  of  analysing  experi- 
mentally more  violent  blows  and  of  measuring  their  duration  and  the  pressures 
developed. 

If  a  rifle  bullet  be  fired  against  the  end  of  a  cylindrical  steel  rod  there  is  a  definite- 
pressure  applied  on  the  end  of  the  rod  at  each  instant  of  time  during  the  period  of 
impact  and  the  pressure  can  be  plotted  as  a  function  of  the  time.      The  pressure-time 
curve  is  a  perfectly  definite  thing,  though  the  ordinates  are  expressed  in  tons  and  the 
abscissae  in  millionths  of  a  second ;  the  pressure  starts  when  the  nose  of  the  bullet 
first  strikes  the  end  of  the  rod  and  it  continues  until  the  bullet  has  been  completely 
set  up  or  stopped  by  the  impact.     Subject  to  qualifications,  which  will  l)e  considered 
later,  the  result  of  applying  this  varying  pres- 
sure to  the  end  is  to  send  along  the  rod  a  wave 
of  pressure  which,  so  long  as  the  elasticity  is 
perfect,  travels  without  change  of  type.     If  the 
pressure    in    different   sections   of  the    rod   be 
plotted  at  any  instant  (fig.   l)  then  at  a  later 

time  the  same  curve  shifted  to  the  right  by  a  distance  proportional  to  the  time 
will  represent  the  then  distribution  of  pressure.  The  velocity  with  which  the  wave 
travels  in  steel  is  approximately  17,000  feet  per  second.  As  the  wave  travels  over 
any  section  of  the  rod,  that  section  successively  experiences  pressures  represented 
*  SEAUS,  '  Proc.  Camb.  Phil.  Soc.,1  vol.  xiv.  (1907),  p.  257,  and  references  there  given. 

VOL.  CCXIII.— A  506.  Publisl"d  "P"*"1*  J"""ry  "• 19U 


Figl 


438         MR.  B.  HOPKINSON  ON  MEASURING  THE  PRESSURE  PRODUCED  IN  THE 

by  the  successive  ordinates  of  the  curve  as  they  pass  over  it.  Thus  the  curve  also 
represents  the  relation  between  the  pressure  at  any  point  of  the  rod  and  the  time, 
the  scale  being  such  that  one  inch  represents  the  time  taken  by  the  wave  to  travel 
that  distance  which  is  very  nearly  .,00*000  of  a  second.  In  particular  the  curve 
giving  the  distribution  of  pressure  in  the  rod  along  its  length  is,  assuming  perfect 
elasticity,  the  same  as  the  curve  connecting  the  pressure  applied  at  the  end  and  the 
time,  the  scale  of  time  being  that  just  given. 

The  progress  of  the  wave  of  stress  along  the  rod  is  accompanied  by  corresponding 
strain  and  therefore  by  movement.  It  is  easy  to  show  that  the  same  curve  which 
represents  the  distribution  of  pressure  at  any  moment  also  represents  the  distribution 
of  velocity  in  the  rod,  the  scale  being  such  that  one  ton  per  square  inch  of  pressure 
corresponds  to  about  1'3  feet  per  second  of  velocity.  Until  the  wave  reaches  any 
section  of  the  rod  that  section  is  at  rest.  It  is  then,  as  the  wave  passes  over  it, 
accelerated  more  or  less  rapidly  to  a  maximum  velocity,  then  retarded,  and  finally  left 
at  rest  with  some  forward  displacement.  In  this  manner  the  momentum  given  to  the 
rod  by  the  application  of  pressure  at  its  end  is  transferred  by  wave  action  along  it, 
the  whole  of  such  momentum  being  at  any  instant  concentrated  in  a  length  of  the  rod 
which  corresponds,  on  the  scale  above  stated  (one  inch  =  .,00^)OU  second),  to  the  time 
taken  to  stop  the  bullet  completely.  Consider  a  portion  of  the  rod  to  the  right  of  any 
section  A  (fig.  l)  which  lies  within  the  wave  at  the  moment  under  consideration. 
The  pressure  has  been  acting  on  this  portion  since  the  wave  first  reached  it,  that  is 

OA 
for  a  time  represented  by  the  length  OA  and  equal  to  -y^-  where  V  is  the  velocity  of 

propagation.  The  momentum  which  has  been  communicated  to  the  part  under 
consideration  is  equal  to  the  time  integral  of  the  pressure  which  has  acted  across  the 
section  A,  that  is  to  the  shaded  area  of  the  curve  in  the  figure.  The  portion  of  the 
rod  to  the  right  of  the  section  is  continually  gaining  momentum  at  the  expense  of  the 
portion  to  the  left  while  the  wave  is  passing,  the  rate  of  transfer  at  any  instant  being 
equal  to  the  pressure. 

When  the  wave  reaches  the  free  end  of  the  rod  it  is  reflected  as  a  wave  of  tension 
which  comes  back  with  the  same  velocity  as  the  pressure  wave,  and  the  state  of  stress 

in  the  rod  subsequently  is  to  be  deter- 
mined by  adding  the  effects  of  the  direct 
and  °f the  reflected  waves.  Now  suppose 
that  the  rod  is  divided  at  some  section,  B, 
near  the  free  end  (fig.  2),  the  opposed 
surfaces  of  the  cut  being  in  firm  contact 

and  carefully  faced.  The  wave  of  pressure  travels  over  the  joint  practically 
unchanged  and  pressure  continues  to  act  between  the  faces  until  the  reflected 
tension  wave  arrives  at  the  joint.  The  pressure  is  then  reduced  by  the  amount 
of  the  tension  due  to  the  reflected  wave  and  as  soon  as  this  overbalances  at 


INTONATION  OF  HIGH  EXPLOSIVES  OK  BY  THE  IMPACT  OF  BULLETS.         439 

section  B  the  pressure  of  the  direct  wave  (which  is  the  moment  shown  in  the 
figure)  the  rod,  being  unable  to  withstand  tension  at  the  joint,  parts  there  and 
the  end  flies  off'.  The  end  piece  has  then  acquired  the  quantity  of  mmm-ntum 
represented  by  the  shaded  area  in  the  figure,  equal  to  the  time-integral  <>f  th- 
pressure  curve  from  0  to  B,  less  that  of  the  tension  wave  during  the  time  for  whirl, 
it  has  been  acting,  that  is  from  O'  to  B.  The  piece  flies  off  with  this  um»unt  ..f 
momentum  trapped,  so  to  speak,  within  it.  If  it  be  caught  in  a  ballistic  pendulum 
and  its  momentum  thus  measured  we  have  the  time  integral  of  the  pressure  CIIIA.- 
between  the  points  B  and  B'  on  the  pressure-time  curve  which  are  such  that  they 
correspond  to  equal  pressures  on  the  rising  and  falling  parts  of  the  curve,  while  th-> 
time-interval  between  them  is  equal  to  that  required  for  a  wave  to  travel  twice  the 
length  of  the  end  piece.  By  taking  end  pieces  of  different  lengths  and  measuring  tl it- 
momentum  so  trapped  in  each  the  area  of  the  pressure-time  curve  over  corresponding 
intervals  can  be  obtained.  In  general  the  precise  form  of  the  curve  itself  cannot  he 
deduced  tecause  the  points  of  commencement  of  the  several  intervals  are  not  known. 
Thus  a  given  set  of  observations  would  be  consistent  with 
any  one  of  the  three  forms  shown  in  fig.  3  which  can  be 
derived  from  one  another  by  shearing  parallel  to  the  base 
so  that  the  intercept  of  any  line  such  as  AA'  is  the  same 
i>n  all.  But  the  maximum  pressure  and  the  total  duration 
of  the  impact  can  always  be  obtained,  and  these  are  the 
most  important  elements.  The  maximum  pressure  is  the  limiting  value  of  the 
average  acting  on  a  piece  when  the  piece  is  very  short,  and  the  duration  corresponds 
to  twice  that  length  of  piece  which  just  catches  the  whole  of  the  momentum  leaving 
the  rod  at  rest.  If  the  circumstances  of  the  impact  are  such  that  the  pi-emu  re  is 
known  to  rise  or  to  fall  with  great  suddenness,  the  curve  assumes  the  form  I.  or  III. 
and  its  form  may  l)e  determined  completely  from  the  observations. 

This  is  the  basis  of  the  method  described  in  the  present  paper.  A  cylindrical  rod 
or  shaft  of  steel  is  hung  up  horizontally  by  four  equal  threads  so  that  it  can  swing  in 
a  vertical  plane  remaining  parallel  to  itself.  A  short  piece  of  rod  of  the  same  diameter 
is  l.uttc.l  up  against  one  end  being  held  on  by  magnetic  attraction  but  otherwise  free. 
A  rifle  bullet  is  fired  at,  or  gun-cotton  is  detonated  near,  the  other  end-;  the  short 
piece  flies  off  and  is  caught  in  a  box  suspended  in  a  similar  manner  to  the  long  rod. 
Suitable  recording  arrangements  register  the  movement  both  of  the  long  rod  and  of 
the  box,  and  the  momentum  in  each  is  calculated  in  the  usual  way  as  for  a  Iwllistic 
pendulum.  Sufficient  magnetic  force  to  hold  the  end-piece  in  position  is  provided  by 
putting  a  solenoid  round  the  rod  in  the  neighbourhood  of  the  joint.  The  slight  force 
required  to  separate  the  piece  from  the  rod  under  these  conditions  may  lie  neglected 
in  comparison  with  the  pressures  and  tensions  set  up,  since  these  amount  to  several 
tons  on  the  square  inch,  and,  practically  speaking,  the  joint  will  transmit  the  pressure 
wave  unchanged  but  will  sustain  no  tension. 


440         MR.  P.  HOPKINSON  ON  MEASURING  THE  PRESSURE  PRODUCED  IN  THE 


A~ 


-,  i-,     e 


Pressure  Produced  by  tlie  Impact  of  Lead  Bullets. 

The  pressure  which  should  be  produced  by  the  impact  of  a  lead  bullet  can  be 
predicted  theoretically,  and  the  study  of  this  pressure  was  made  rather  with  a  view 
to  checking  the  method  than  in  the  hope  of  discovering  any  new  facts.  At  velocities 

exceeding  1000  feet  per  second  lead   behaves  on  impact 
Pjg.4.  against  a  hard  surface  practically  as  a  perfect  fluid. 

The  course  of  the  impact  is  shown  in  fig.  4.  The  base  of 
the  bullet  at  the  moment  of  striking  is  at  A ;  a  little  later 
it  is  at  B.  Assuming  perfect  fluidity  the  base  of  the 
bullet  knows  nothing  of  the  impact  at  the  nose  and 
continues  to  move  forward  with  unimpaired  velocity. 
Hence  the  time  elapsing  between  the  two  positions  shown 

in  the  figure  is  -^.     The  momentum  which  has  been  destroyed  up  to  this  time  is  to 

a  first  approximation  that  of  the  portion  of 
the  bullet  which   has  been  flattened  out, 
namely  that  portion  shown  shaded  in  the 
dotted  figure.      Knowing  the  distribution 
of  mass    along  the   length  this    is   easily      ^ 
calculated.     This  simple  theory  is  subject      ^ 
to  some  qualifications  due  partly  to  want      ^ 
of  perfect  fluidity,  and  partly  to  the  fact      ^j- 
that  the   sections    of  the    bullet   are    not      s 
brought  right  up   to  the  face  and  there 
stopped  dead,  as  is  assumed  in  the  theory, 
but  are  more  or  less  gradually  retarded  or 
deflected  in  the  region  of  curved  steam-lines 
at  C.     These  corrections  are,  however,  most 
conveniently   introduced  when    comparing 
the  theory  with  the  experimental  results. 

The  bullets  used  were  of  two  patterns, 
one  the  ordinary  service  form  (Mark  VI.) 
and  the  other  a  soft-nosed  bullet  supplied 
on  the  market  for  sporting  purposes.  Both 
are  of  lead,  encased  in  nickel.  Sections  of 
the  bullets  are  shown  in  fig.  5.*  Sample 
bullets  were  sawn  into  sections,  and  the 
sections  weighed.  The  distribution  of  weight  along  the  length  thus  determined 

The  soft-nosed  bullet  (lower  figure)  has  four  longitudinal  saw-cuts  in  the  nickel  casing ;  the  section  is 
taken  through  two  of  these  cuts. 


•5  -75  I-O 

Lengths,   Inches. 


DETONATION  OF  HIGH  EXPLOSIVES  OR  BY  THE  IMPACT  OF  BULLETS.        441 

is  shown  in  the  curve  fig.  5.     The  hullets  were  almost  precisely  alike  both  in  regard 
to  total  weight  (0'0306  Ibs.)  and  distribution  of  weight  along  the  length. 

Most  of  the  experiments  were  made  with  the  service  cartridge,  in  the  service  rifle, 
giving  an  average  velocity  of  2000  feet  per  second.  These  cartridges  were  very 
uniform,  the  range  of  variation  in  velocity  being  under  one  per  cent.  Some 
experiments  were  also  made  with  cartridges  giving  velocities  of  about  1240  feet  per 
second  and  700  feet  per  second  respectively. 

The  rod  against  which  the  bullet  was  fired  was  in  most  cases  of  steel  containing 
C,  0'4  per  cent.  ;  Mn,  1'05  per  cent.  Its  breaking  strength  was  37  tons  per  square 
inch  with  24  per  cent,  elongation  over  8  inches.  The  end  of  the  rod  was  heated  to  a 
white  heat  in  the  forge  and  quenched  and  would  then  stand  a  large  number  of  shots 
without  serious  damage.  In  some  cases  tool  steel  hardened,  and  tempered  blue,  was 
used,  but  it  was  found  difficult  to  get  the  temper  exactly  right.  The  pieces  butted  to 
the  end  of  the  rod  were  usually  of  mild  steel.  For  recording  the  movement  of  the  rod 
and  of  the  box  in  which  the  piece  was  caught  each  was  fitted  with  a  pencil  which 
moved  over  a  horizontal  sheet  of  paper  and  the  length  of  the  mark  was  measured. 

Assuming  that  the  bullet  strikes  the  rod  fairly  in  the  centre,  and  that  the 
fragments  are  shot  out  radially,  the  total  momentum  recorded  in  rod  and  piece  should 
be  equal  to  the  momentum  of  the  bullet,  which  at  2000  feet  per  second  is  61  "2  Ib.  feet 
per  second  units.  In  fact,  considerable  variations  were  found  in  the  total  momentum. 
For  instance,  in  110  shots  fired  at  a  1-inch  rod,  the  maximum  total  recorded  was  76, 


100 


60 


40 


Fig.6. 


Length  of  piece  ,  Inches 

the  minimum  50,  and  the  average  63.  With  a  rod  of  l£  inches  diameter,  the 
variation  was  less  ;  61  shots  showed  a  minimum  of  59,  a  maximum  of  70,  and  a  mean  of 
62-5  High  values  are  probably  due  to  fragments  being  thrown  back  by  irregularities 
in  the  surface  of  the  rod,  low  values  to  slight  errors  in  aiming.  It  was  found, 
however,  that  with  a  piece  of  given  length,  the  total  momentum  was  shared  between 
the  piece  and  the  rod  in  a  nearly  constant  proportion,  though  the 

VOL.  CCXIII. — A.  3  L 


442       MR.  B.  HOPKINSON  ON  MEASURING  THE  PRESSURE  PRODUCED  IN  THE 


might  vary  widely.  This  is  to  be  expected  if  the  explanation  just  given  of  the 
irregularities  is  correct.  For  instance  a  cup-shaped  cavity  in  the  rod  such  as  is 
formed  after  a  large  number  of  shots  will  give  a  high  value  for  the  momentum,  but  if 
not  too  pronounced  it  will  not  seriously  affect  the  form  of  the  relation  between 
pressure  and  time. 

The  results  have  accordingly  been  reduced  by  taking  in  every  case  the  percentages 
of  the  total  momentum  found  in  the  piece.  The  following  table  gives  details  of  one 
set  of  experiments.  It  was  found  that  there  was  no  systematic  difference  between  the 
service  bullets  and  the  soft  bullets,  and  the  results  for  both  types  are  included  in 
the  table : — 

ROD,  1  inch  diameter,  43  inches  to  50  inches  long.     2000  feet  per  second. 


Percentage  of  total  in  piece. 

Total  momentum  in  rod  and  piece. 

Length  of 

Number  of 

piece. 

shots. 

Maximum. 

Minimum. 

Mean. 

Maximum. 

Minimum. 

Mean. 

inches 

0-5 

19 

'11-6 

9'8 

10-9 

63 

58 

60 

1-0 

25 

24-0 

20-4 

22-1 

66 

58 

62 

2-0 

8 

46-0 

40-6 

43-2 

73 

60 

65 

3-0 

26 

63-0 

58-0 

61-0 

66 

59 

62 

3-5 

6 

71-0 

69-0 

70-4 

71 

65 

67 

4-0 

6 

82-0 

79-0 

79-7 

67 

50 

62 

5-0 

11 

93-0 

94-5 

93-5 

76 

59 

67 

6-0 

9 

99 

•  —  • 

97-6 

69 

63 

66 

The  mean  percentages  given  in  the  third  column  of  the  table  are  plotted  against 
length  of  piece  in  fig.  6.  As  the  wave  travels  2'04  inches  in  10~5  seconds,  1  inch 
length  of  piece  represents  0'98  x  10~8  seconds.*  The  slope  of  this  curve  represents 
pressure,  and  as  already  explained  the  maximum  pressure  is  represented  by  the  slope 
at  the  origin.  This  is  22  per  inch,  and  assuming  an  average  total  momentum  of 
61 '2  units  the  corresponding  pressure  is 


0'22x61'2xlQ5 
32'2xO-98 


=  42,600  Ibs.  or  19'0  tons. 


It  will  also  be  noticed  that  the  impact  is  practically  complete  in  6xlO~5  seconds, 
97^  per  cent,  of  the  total  being  then  accounted  for  in  the  piece. 

According  to  the  simple  theory,  which  regards  each  element  of  the  bullet  as  coming 
up  to  the  end  of  the  rod  with  its  velocity  v 0  unimpaired  and  there  suffering  instant 

t  The  value  of  E  for  the  mild  steel  of  which  the  pieces  were  made  was  found  to  be  3 '00  x  107  Ibs.  per 
square  inch.     The  density  was  482  Ibs.  per  cubic  foot.     Both  determinations  are  probably  right  within 

/TJT 

1  per  cent.     The  velocity  of  propagation  A/ --  is  17,000  feet  per  second. 


DETONATION  OF  MICH   KXPI.OSIVKS  <>l;  I!Y  TIIK  IMPACT  <»K  P.l'l.l  I  I  : 


stoppage,  the  pressure  at  any  time  is  \v0*  where  X  is  the  mass  per  unit  length  at  the 
section  which  is  undergoing  stoppage  at  the  time.  The  pressure-time  curve,  calculated 
in  this  way,  is  shown  in  fig.  7,  in  which  the  ordinates  are  proportional  to  the  values  of  X. 
This  is  the  same  curve  as  that  giving  the  distrihution  of  mass  along  the  length  of  the 
bullet,  the  abscissa  scale  being  such  that  the  length  OF  within  which  the  impact  is 


.MIDI  III 


40000 


^3001)0 


zo.ooo 


10,000 


Rg.7 


- 

Time  ,  M's3a». 


t 


••  F 


complete  is  equivalent  to  the  time  required  by  the  bullet  to  travel  its  own  length 
(1'25  inches)  at  a  velocity  of  2000  feet  per  second.  This  is  5'2x  lQ-»  seconds.  The 
maximum  pressure  corresponds  to  the  maximum  value  of  X  (0  35  Ibs.  per  foot)  and  is 


Pj35_x2000x200p 
32'2 


=  43 


This  difference  is 


which  is  2£  per  cent,  in  excess  of  the  value  found  by  experiment, 
no  more  than  can  be  accounted  for  by  errors  of  observation. 

The  momenta  which  should  according  to  theory  be  taken  up  by  various  lengths 
piece  are  readily  calculated  from  this  curve.     For  instance,  that  corresponding 
3-inch  piece  is  the  area  ABODE.     The  following  table  shows  the  results  a 
with  the  corresponding  observed  values.     The  momenta  are  reckonec 
of  the  total :— 


Percentage  momentum  in  piece. 

Length  of  piece. 

Calculated. 

Observed. 

inches 

Q 

65 

61 

1 

84 

80 

98-5 

93-5 

6 

100 

97-5 

3  L  2 


444         MR.  B.  HOPKINSON  ON  MEASURING  THE  PRESSURE  PRODUCED  IN  THE 

The  differences  between  the  calculated  and  observed  figures  in  this  table  are 
probably  rather  outside  experimental  errors.  Especially  is  this  the  case  as  regards 
the  5-inch  and  6-inch  pieces.  The  impact  seems  to  last  appreciably  longer  than  it 
ought. 

The  Effect  of  the  Rigidity  of  the  Bullet. 

In  the  simple  theory  it  is  assumed  that  the  bullet  is  absolutely  fluid.  In  fact,  it 
possesses  a  certain  rigidity,  partly  because  of  the  nickel  casing  and  partly  because  of 
the  viscosity  of  the  lead  the  effects  of  which  may  be  quite  appreciable  at  such  high 
speeds  of  deformation.  The  general  effect  of  rigidity  may  be  represented  by  saying 
that  any  section  of  the  bullet  requires  to  be  subjected  to  an  end-pressure  P  before  it 
begins  to  deform  at  all,  and  this  pressure  must  act  across  the  section  CC  (fig.  4)  where 
deformation  is  just  beginning  and  where,  if  the  bullet  were  really  fluid,  there  would  be 
no  pressure.  To  a  first  approximation,  P  will  be  proportional  to  the  area  of  the  cross- 
section  of  the  bullet  which  is  undergoing  deformation,  that  is  to  X  the  mass  per  unit 
length  in  the  plane  CC.  The  pressure  P  is  added  to  that  due  to  the  destruction  ot 
momentum,  making  a  total  pressure  P  +  Xv2  where  X  is  the  mass  per  foot  of  the  section 
of  the  bullet  in  the  plane  CC,  v  the  velocity  of  that  section.  Further,  the  part  of  the 
bullet  behind  CC  is  being  continually  retarded  by  the  pressure  P,  with  the  result  that 
the  hinder  parts  do  not  come  up  with  unimpaired  velocity  va,  as  they  would  if  the 
bullet  were  quite  fluid,  but  with  a  diminishing  velocity. 

The  general  effect  of  this  is  obvious.  In  the  early  stages  of  the  impact  there  has 
not  been  time  for  much  retardation,  and  the  pressure  will  be  increased  above  the 
theoretical  value1  by  nearly  the  amount  P.  As  the  hinder  parts  come  up,  however, 
with  less  and  less  velocity,  the  fluid  pressure  term  diminishes  until  the  pressure  falls 
below  the  theoretical  value  in  spite  of  the  rigidity  term  P.  Applying  this  correction 
to  a  pressure  curve  such  as  that  in  fig.  7  in  which  the  maximum  pressure  occurs 
somewhat  late  in  the  impact,  it  will  be  seen  that  the  general  effect  will  be  to  reduce 
that  maximum,  and  also  to  make  it  flatter.  Furthermore,  since  the  tail  of  the  bullet 
takes  longer  to  reach  the  end  of  the  rod,  the  impact  will  be  prolonged  beyond  the 
theoretical  time. 

It  is  easy  to  get  a  rough  idea  of  the  magnitude  of  these  effects.  Assume  that  the 
bullet  is  cylindrical  and  of  mass  X  per  unit  length  and  that  the  deforming  pressure  is 
constant.  Let  x  be  the  length  of  the  bullet  behind  the  plane  CC  (fig.  4).  This 
portion  is  moving  as  a  rigid  body  with  acceleration  x  and  its  equation  of  motion  is 

\xx  =  —  P, 
which  integrates  in  the  form 

p 

?x2  = log  x  +  const. 

X 

If  I  be  the  length  of  the  bullet  and  1 0  its  velocity  on  striking,  and  if  we  neglect  the 


DETONATION  OF  HIGH  EXPLOSIVES  OR  BY  THE  IMPACT  OF  BULLETS.        445 

small  distance  between  the  plane  CC  and  the  end  of  the  rod,  the  constant  of  integra- 

tion  is 

p 
bt'>  +  - 

\ 

and  we  have 


x*       2P,       / 
1  --  ,  =  —  -log-. 
t'u8      At'*     "  ./• 


From  this  x  can  be  plotted  in  terms  of  x,  and  thence  in  terms  of  t.     'IV  total  pressure 
P  +  Xcc3  is  then  plotted  in  terms  of  the  time. 

As  an  example,  take  X  =  0'35  Ibs.  per  foot,  I  =  1'05  inches  which  correspond  to  a 
bullet  having  the  same  mean  density  diameter  and  total  mass  as  those  used  in  the 
experiments.  The  pressure  required  to  stop  such  a  bullet  at  2000  feet  per  second,  if 
fluid,  would  be  constant  and  equal  to  43,500  Ibs.  If  P  be  taken  as  ^  of  this,  or 
2170  Ibs.,  and  the  curve  plotted  as  described,  it  will  be  found  that  when  x  =  0'3/  the 
hydrodynamical  pressure  Xca  has  dropped  12  per  cent,  making,  after  allowing  the 
addition  of  5  per  cent,  for  the  rigidity,  a  nett  drop  of  7  per  cent.  Furthermore, 
the  momentum  still  left  after  a  fluid  bullet  would  have  been  completely  set  up  is  about 
4  per  cent,  of  the  whole. 

If  corrections  of  this  amount  were  applied  to  the  calculated  figures  in  the  last  section. 
the  effect  would  be  to  make  the  observed  maximum  pressure  about  4  per  cent,  too 
high,  while  the  observed  time  of  impact  would"  be  still  slightly  too  long.  It  was  found 
that  to  crush  the  cylindrical  part  of  the  service  bullet  in  a  testing  machine  required 
an  end  pressure  of  about  1800  Ibs.,  but  the  nickel  casing  failed  by  buckling,  where!* 
in  the  impact  it  apparently  bursts  and  is  torn  into  strips  along  the  length  of  the 
bullet.  The  pressure  required  to  deform  the  bullet  in  the  latter  case,  after  rupture  is 
once  started,  is  probably  less  than  2000  Ibs.  Thus,  while  the  difference  between  the 
observed  and  calculated  times  of  impact  may  undoubtedly  be  referred  in  part  to 
rigidity,  it  is  unlikely  that  the  whole  can  be  accounted  for  in  this  way. 

Discussion  of  Errors  Inherent  in  the  Method  of  Experiment. 

In  calculating  the  pressure  from  the  momentum  in  the  piece  which  is  tin-own  off 
the  end  of  the  rod  it  is  assumed  that  the  pressure  wave  transmitted  along  the  rod 
represents  exactly  the  sequence  of  pressures  applied  at  the  end,  that  it  travels  along 
the  rod  and  through  the  joint  without  change  of  type,  and  that  it  is  perfectly 
reflected  at  the  other  end.  These  assumptions  are  correct  if  the  wave  is  long 
compared  with  the  diameter  of  the  rod,  and  if  the  pressure  is  uniformly  distributed 
over  the  end,  but  are  subject  to  certain  qualifications  in  so  far  as  these  conditions  are 

not  fulfilled. 

(a)  Effect  of  Length  of  the  Rod—  The  mathematical  theory  of  the  longitudinal 
oscillations  of  a  cylinder  shows  that  a  pressure  wave  of  simple  harmonic  type  is 
propagated  without  change,  but  the  velocity  of  propagation  depends  on  the  wave- 
length. Because  of  the  kinetic  energy  involved  in  the  radial  displacements,  which  is 


446 


MR.  B.  HOPKINSON  ON  MEASURING  THE  PRESSURE  PRODUCED  IN  THE 


negligible  when  the  wave  is  long  compared  with  the  diameter,  the  velocity  diminishes 
with  the  wave-length.     If  the  wave-length  be  --  ,  and  if  the  radius  of  the  cylinder 

/E  7 

be  a,  the  velocity  is  A/  —  (1— £<r2y2a2)  correct  to  the  square  of  ya*     In  a  wave  of 

P 

any  form,  the  simple  harmonic  components  move  with  different  velocities,  and  the 
wave  accordingly  changes  its  form  as  it  progresses. 

Rough  calculation  of  this  effect  on  waves  generally  similar  in  form  to  that  produced 
by  the  blow  of  the  bullet,  but  of  periodic  character,  showed  that  the  change  should 
not  be  very  serious  with  rods  of  the  lengths  and  diameters  used  in  these  experiments. 
It  was,  however,  thought  advisable  to  check  this  inference  by  direct  experiment,  and 
trials  were  therefore  made  with  a  rod  15  inches  long  and  1  inch  diameter.  The 
small  mass  of  this  rod  precluded  its  use  as  a  ballistic  pendulum  suspended  in  the 
ordinary  way,  it  was  therefore  arranged  to  slide  in  bearings  and  to  compress  a  spring 
buffer.  Difficult  questions  arose  as  to  the  precise  allowance  which  should  be  made 
for  the  kinetic  energy  given  to  the  spring  (which  was  of  considerable  mass)  by  the 
rod,  and  no  attempt  was  therefore  made  to  get  an  accurate  measure  of  the  total 
momentum.  Instead  of  taking  the  fraction  of  this  total  which  was  trapped  in  the 
piece,  the  absolute  values  of  the  momenta  so  trapped  were  taken  in  a  series  of  shots, 
in  each  of  which,  from  the  accuracy  of  the  aiming  and  the  absence  of  cupping  in  the 
end,  it  might  be  assumed  that  the  total  momentum  was  approximately  equal  to  the 
average.  The  results  are  shown  in  the  following  table  and  are  compared  with  the 
corresponding  figures  obtained  with  the  long  rod  : — 

ROD,  1  inch  diameter.     2000  feet  per  second. 


Momentum  given  to  piece. 

Length  of  piece. 

Number  of 
shots. 

Short  rod  (15  inches). 

Long  rod. 

Mean. 

Maximum. 

Minimum. 

Mean. 

inches 

i 

7 

6-5 

6-8 

6-4 

6-7 

1 

5 

13-3 

13-9 

12-8 

13-5 

2 

2 

26-5 

26-8 

26-2 

26-4 

4 

6 

49-3 

51-2 

48-6 

48-8 

5 

2 

60-2 

61-3 

59-1 

57-2 

It  is  clear  from  these  figures  that  there  is  no  systematic  difference  between  the 
results  obtained  with  the  two  rods.  The  change,  if  any,  between  the  forms  of  the 
wave  when  at  15  inches  and  at  45  inches  from  the  end  consists  in  a  shearing  of  the 

*  LOVE,  '  Mathematical  Theory  of  Elasticity,'  2nd  edition,  p.  277. 


DETONATION  OF  HIGH  EXPLOSIVES  OR  BY  THE  IMPACT  OF  BITLLETS.        447 

whole  curve  as  iu  the  manner  illustrated  in  fig.  3.  Such  a  change  of  form — analogous 
to  the  change  preparatory  to  breaking  which  a  wave  experiences  as  it  advances  into 
shallower  water — would  not  be  detected  by  these  experiments,  and  it  is  not  impossible 
that  it  occurs  to  some  extent. 

(b)  Reflection  and  Effect  of  the  Joint. — The  simple  harmonic  pressure-wave  which 
is  propagated  without  change  of  type  is  accompanied  by  a  distribution  of  shearing- 
stress  across  the  section.     This  shearing-stress  depends  on  the  square  of  the  ratio  yo, 
and  is  small.     That  it  plays  no  important  part  in  these  experiments  is  shown  by  the 
fact  that  if  there  be  a  joint  in  the  long  rod  the  results  are  unaltered.     Such  a  joint 
transmits  the  pressure,  but  stops  the  shearing-stress  part  of  the  wave.     As  might  be 
expected,  it  was  found  that  the  faces  of  the  joint  must  be  a  carefully  scraped  fit  if 
the  wave  is  to  pass  it  unaltered. 

The  small  magnitude  of  the  shearing-stress  is  the  foundation  of  the  assumption 
that  the  wave  is  perfectly  reflected  at  the  free  end.  Strictly  accurate  reflection  is 
not  possible.  A  reflected  wave  which  is  exactly  the  same  as  the  incident  wave,  except 
that  the  signs  of  all  the  stresses  are  reversed,  will  when  combined  with  the  incident 
wave  give  no  normal  force  over  the  free  end.  The  shearing-stresses  corresponding  to 
the  two  waves  do  not,  however,  neutralise  each  other,  but  are  added,  hence  accurate 
reflection  can  only  be  brought  about  by  the  application  of  a  distribution  of  shear  over 
the  free  end.  The  shear  required  is,  however,  of  the  order  -/a*  and  the  experiment 
with  the  joint  shows  that  its  effects  may  be  neglected. 

(c)  Effect  of  the  Diameter  of  the  Rod.— The   pressure  exerted  by  the  bullet  is 
confined  to  a  comparatively  small  area  in  the  centre  of  the  end ;  whereas  the  pressure- 
wave  travelling  without  change  of  type  implies  a   nearly  uniform  distribution  of 
pressure  over  the  section.     The  question  of  the  nature  of  the  wave  developed  under 
such    conditions     seemed    quite     intractable     mathematically,    but    from    general 
considerations  it  appeared  probable  that  it  would  not  differ  greatly  from  that  of 
wave  originated  by  a  uniform  pressure  distribution.      In  order  to  te*    this  poi 

2000  feet  per  second. 


Percentage  of  momentum  in  piece. 

Length  of  piece. 

}  inch. 

1  inch. 

H  inch. 

inches 
0-5 
1-0 

10-8 
21-1 

10-9 
22-1 
42-2 

10-35 
22-0 
40-5 

•0 
3-0 
4-0 

5-0 

61-3 
79-5 
92-5 

61-2 
79-7 
93-5 
97-5 

60-2 
78 
88 
89 

•o 



448         MR.  B.  HOPKINSON  ON  MEASURING  THE  PRESSURE  PRODUCED  IN  THE 

comparative  tests  were  made  with  rods  off  inch,  1  inch,  and  l|-  inch  diameter.  The 
lengths  of  the  rods  were  roughly  48  inches,  43  inches,  and  30  inches,  respectively. 
The  results  are  exhibited  in  the  table  on  p.  447,  in  which  the  figures  for  the  1-inch 
rod  are  the  same  as  those  already  given. 

It  will  be  seen  that  the  diameter  of  the  rod  has  no  appreciable  effect  up  to  a 
length  of  4  inches,  but  that  for  greater  lengths  the  large  rod  gives  appreciably  lower 
values.  In  other  words  the  apparent  maximum  pressure  is  not  much  affected  by  the 
diameter,  and  is  presumably  correctly  given  by  all  three  rods,  while  the  duration  of 
the  blow  is  largely  overestimated  by  the  1^-inch  rod,  and  presumably  somewhat 
overestimated  by  the  other  two,  though  as  they  are  in  substantial  agreement  on 
this  point  the  error  cannot  be  very  large.  It  may  be  surmised  that  some  at  any 
rate  of  the  difference  between  the  observed  and  calculated  times  of  impact  is  due  to 
this  cause,  though,  as  already  pointed  out,  the  rigidity  of  the  bullet  is  competent 
to  account  for  part  of  it. 

Experiments  at  Lower  Velocities. 

Measurements  were  also  made  with  cartridges  giving  velocities  of  about  1240  feet 
per  second  and  700  feet  per  second  respectively,  the  same  types  of  bullet  being  used. 
The  results  for  the  1240  feet  per  second  cartridges  are  exhibited  in  the  following 
table,  which  corresponds  to  that  already  given  on  p.  442  for  the  2000  feet  per  second 
cartridges  : — 

ROD,  1  inch  diameter,  about  40  inches  long.    Velocity  of  bullets  1240  feet  per  second. 
(Mean  of  5  shots  :  maximum  1257,  minimum  1229.) 


Percentage  of  total  in  piece. 

Total  momentum  in  rod  and  piece. 

Length  of 

Number  of 

piece. 

shots. 

Maximum. 

Minimum. 

Mean. 

Maximum. 

Minimum. 

Mean. 

inches 

0-5 

1 





6-5 





37-9 

1 

8 

12-9 

12-3 

12-7 

38-5 

36-8 

37-7 

2 

7 

26-7 

25-8 

26-5 

35-9 

31-5 

34-0 

3 

4 

38-4 

37-5 

38-1 

39-4 

37-7 

38-4 

4 

5 

51-6 

50-6 

51-1 

39-1 

38-3 

38-6 

5 

3 

63-0 

61-5 

62-1 

40-4 

39-1 

39-7 

6 

4 

67-7 

67-5 

67-6 

37-2 

35-9 

36-6 

9 

5 

89 

81-5 

85-8 

39-0 

35-8 

37-0 

The  mean  total  momentum  registered  (37  shots)  is  37'7  units  ;   the  calculated  total 
is  1240  x  0'0306  =  38  units. 

The  percentage  figures  are  plotted  in  fig.  G  (curve  marked  "  1240  feet  per  second"). 


DETONATION  OF  HIGH  EXPLOSIVES  OR  BY  THE  IMPACT  OF  BULLETS.         449 

The   percentage  of  momentum   trapped   by  short   pieces   is    13   per  inch,  and   the 
corresponding  maximum  pressure  for  the  normal  velocity  of  1240  feet  per  second  is 

0-13x38 
32;2xO-98xlO-»  = 

The  maximum  pressure  which  should  be  exerted  by  a  perfectly  fluid  bullet  having  the 

same  mass  and  velocity  is 


The  time  taken  by  the  bullet  to  travel  its  own  length  is  8'4  x  10'*  seconds.  Thus 
if  the  bullet  were  perfectly  fluid,  the  whole  momentum  should  be  trapped  in  a  piece 
9  inches  long,  whereas  in  fact  only  86  per  cent,  is  so  trapped.  The  errors  inherent 
in  the  method  of  experiment,  which  have  been  discussed  in  the  last  section,  will  all  be 
less  at  the  lower  velocity.  On  the  other  hand  the  rigidity  of  the  bullet  will  IKJ 
relatively  more  important  and  probably  suffices  to  account  for  much  of  the  difference 
between  the  theoretical  and  observed  times  of  impact. 

The  700  feet  per  second  bullets  showed  a  maximum  pressure  of  5450  Ibs.,  as 
compared  with  5320  Ibs.  calculated.  54£  per  cent,  of  the  momentum  was  trapped  by 
a  9-inch  piece.  It  was  not  possible  to  experiment  with  longer  pieces,  so  that  the  time 
of  impact  in  this  case  could  not  be  determined. 

It  should  be  observed  here  that  just  after  the  piece  has  been  shot  off  it  tends  to 
pull  the  rod  after  it  by  magnetic  attraction,  which  of  course  still  continues  after  the 
joint  is  broken,  though  it  diminishes  rapidly  as  the  distance  between  piece  and  rod 
widens.  The  effect  of  this  is  to  give  more  momentum  to  the  rod  and  less  to  the  piece 
than  they  would  respectively  possess  as  the  effect  of  the  blow  alone.  By  measuring 
the  amount  of  the  magnetic  pull  when  the  piece  is  held  at  different  distances  from  the 
rod,  the  current  in  the  solenoid  being  the  same  as  that  used  in  the  impact  experiment, 
it  is  possible  to  estimate  the  amount  of  this  effect.  With  2000  feet  per  second  bullets 
it  is  quite  negligible,  but  when  the  velocities  are  lower  particularly  with  long  pieces, 
it  necessitates  a  correction.  This  correction  has  been  applied  in  the  figures  given 
above  for  the  1240  feet  per  second  and  700  feet  per  second  bullets. 

Detonation  of  (run-  Cotton. 

It  is  well-known  that  a  charge  of  1  Ib.  gun-cotton  will  shatter  a  mild  steel  plate 
1  inch  thick  or  more,  if  it  be  detonated  in  firm  contact  with  it.  The  fracture  is  quite 
"  short,"  like  that  of  cast-iron,  though  the  broken  pieces  are  usually  more  or  less 
deformed.  Typical  fractures  of  this  kind  obtained  on  plates  of  very  good  mild  steel 
are  illustrated  in  figs.  8,  9,  10,  and  11.  Figs.  8  and  9  are  photographs  of  a  plate 
1±  inches  thick  originally  quite  flat.  It  was  broken  by  a  slab  of  gun-cotton  weighing 
1  Ib.  which  covered  the  section  of  the  plate  AB  and  was  detonated  in  contact  with 

VOL.  CCXIII.  —  A.  3   M 


450        MR.  B.  HOPKINSON  ON  MEASURING  THE  PRESSURE  PRODUCED  IN  THE 


that  which  became  the  convex  face  (lower  face  in  fig.  9).  Fig.  10  is  a  view  of  the 
broken  edge  of  one  of  the  two  fragments.  The  plate  shown  in  fig.  1 1  was  a  flat  piece 
of  boiler  plate  l£  inch  thick.  A  slab  of  1  Ib.  of  gun-cotton  was  detonated  against 
that  which  is  the  under  side  in  the  figure  and  the  two  pieces  subsequently  fitted 
together  again  and  photographed.  Thinner  plates — e.g.,  I  inch  thick — are  usually 


B 


A I  \B 

i  \ 


Fig.  8. 


Fig.  9. 


Fig.  10. 


Fig.  11. 

cracked  in  two  places,  one  at  each  edge  of  the  gun-cotton  slab,  and  the  portion 
covered  by  the  slab  is  blown  out  of  the  plate,  sometimes  whole  and  sometimes 
shattered  into  pieces.  The  fact  that  no  tamping  is  necessaiy  suggests  that  the 
duration  of  the  process  of  detonation  is  of  the  same  order  as  the  time  taken  by  sound 
to  travel  an  inch  or  less  in  air,  so  that  during  the  conversion  of  the  cotton  into  gas 
there  is  not  time  for  much  expansion.*  If  this  be  so,  the  maximum  pressure 

h  The  velocity  of  detonation  of  long  trains  of  gun-cotton  has  often  been  measured  and  is  variously 
estimated  at  18,000  to  20,000  feet  per  second.  If  the  same  velocity  obtained  in  the  small  primers  they 
would  be  completely  converted  into  gas  in  about  2  x  1Q~6  sees, 


DETONATION  OF  HIOH  EXPLOSIVES  OR  BY  THE  IMPACT  OF  BULLETS.        451 

developed  must  be  that  which  would  l,e  reached  if  the  cotton  were  fired  in  a  closed 
chamber  of  a  volume  not  greatly  exceeding  that  of  the  slab.  The  pressure  is  then 
d,8sipated  with  great  rapidity  by  the  expansion  of  the  gas,  which  is  resisted  only  !,y 
its  own  inertia  and  that  of  the  surrounding  air. 

Experiments  on  the  detonation  of  gun-cotton  have  been  made  by  the  method 
described  m  this  paper.  It  has  only  been  possible  hitherto  to  use  quite  small  charge 
and  the  results  are  a  very  rough  approximation,  but  as  they  thmw  light  .,.,  a  matter 


Fig.  12. 

of  which  little  is  known  I  have  thought  it  worth  while  to  give  them.  Briefly, 
the  conclusion  is  that  the  pressure  at  a  point  distant  £  of  an  inch  from  the  surface  of 
one  ounce  of  dry  gun-cotton  (a  cylindrical  "  dry  primer  "  about  1^  inch  diameter  and 
l£  inches  long),  when  detonated  with  fulminate,  has  fallen  to  less  than  J  of  the 
maximum  value  within  2  x  10~8  seconds.  At  least,  80  per  cent,  of  the  blow  has  been 
delivered  within  that  time.  Over  an  interval  of  10~6  seconds  round  about  the  time 
of  maximum  pressure  the  average  pressure  is  alxmt  .'30  tons  per  square  inch,  and  tlu- 

3  M  2 


452         MR.  B.  HOPKINSON  ON  MEASURING  THE  PRESSURE  PRODUCED  IN  THE 


actual  maximum  is  probably  of  the  order  of  40  tons  per  square  inch.  At  a  point  on 
the  surface  the  maximum  pressure  is  at  least  twice  as  great,  80  tons  per  square  inch.* 

The  arrangements  are  shown  in  fig.  12. 

The  gun-cotton  cylinder  A  is  fixed  by  short  splints  of  wood  opposite  the  end  of  the 
shaft  B,  which  is  of  mild  steel  l£  inches  diameter  and  from  15  to  30  inches  long.  This 
shaft  is  suspended  as  a  ballistic  pendulum  with  a  pencil  and  paper  for  recording  its 


Total  nett 

Percentage 

Average 

Length  of  piece. 

momentum  shaft 
and  piece. 

of 
total  in  piece. 

percentage  in 
piece. 

inches 

[ 

40-7 

/      86-6 

"* 

46-2 

93 

38-8 

93 

3-85 

50-0 

92 

90 

41-4 

90 

t31-2 

90 

• 

145  6 

88 

- 

c 

60-0 

89 

"j 

' 

57-3 
50-9 

88 
89 

S            89 

I 

74-3 

90 

J 

f 

36-7 

81 

1 

2     { 

38-7 
42-9 

87 
84 

l>             83 

I 

42-0 

79 

J 

f 

40-8 

57 

• 

42-3 

57 

0-95              -j 

1 

44-1 

55-4 

55 
60 

57 

t44-C 

57 

I 

t50'8 

58 

\ 

movement.  The  end  piece  C,  from  |-  to  6  inches  long,  is  held  on  by  magnetic 
attraction.  The  faces  of  the  joint  are  a  scraped  fit.  In  line  with  the  shaft  is  the  box 
D,  which  is  also  suspended  as  a  pendulum  and  provided  with  a  recording  pencil.  Some 
part  of  the  momentum  given  to  the  box  is  due  to  the  blast  from  the  gun-cotton  ;  this 

*  The  pressure  developed  by  the  explosion  of  gun-cotton  in  a  vessel  which  it  completely  fills  does  not 
appear  to  have  been  measured.  From  measurements  made  with  changes  of  lower  density  Sir  ANDREW 
NOBLE  estimates  that  it  would  be  about  120  tons  per  square  inch  ('Artillery  and  Explosives,' p.  345). 
Allowing  for  the  partial  expansion  during  the  process  of  detonation,  this  agrees  fairly  well  with  the 
pressure  here  determined. 

t  In  these  cases  the  air  space  between  the  gun-cotton  and  the  end  of  the  shaft  was  1  inch.  In  all  the 
others  it  was  f  inch. 


DETONATION  OF  HIGH  EXPLOSIVES  OR  BY  THE  IMPACT  OF  BULLETS.         |ft| 

was  estimated  from  experiments  in  which  there  was  no  piece  on  the  end  of  the  shaft. 
Separate  experiments  were  also  made  to  determine  the  effect  of  the  blast  on  the 
supports  of  the  shaft.  The  momentum  accounted  for  by  the  blast  is  in  each  cane 
deducted  from  the  total  recorded  momentum  to  get  the  nett  momentum  due  to  the  blow 
on  the  end  of  the  shaft.  This  correction  in  the  case  of  the  box  amounted  to  about 
8'3  units  with  a  15-inch  shaft,  and  1'2  units  with  a  30-inch  shaft.  The  correction  for 
the  blast  on  the  supports  of  the  shaft  was  5  units. 

The  table  on  p.  452  gives  the  results  of  all  the  trials  made  with  the  gun-cotton  about 
f  inch  from  the  end  of  the  shaft. 

The  total  impulse  of  the  blow  when  the  air  space  is  f  inch  varies  from  almut  35  to 
70  units,  the  average  being  about  46  units.  The  percentages  abHorlx.*!  by  the  different 
end-pieces  are,  however,  more  nearly  constant,  and  from  them  a  rough  approximation 
to  the  pressure  wave  transmitted  by  the  rod  in  an  average  case  may  be  constructed. 
As  already  explained  the  precise  form  of  this  curve  depends  on  the  way  in  which  the 
pressure  rises,  but  it  may  be  assumed  in  this  case  that  the  pressure  reaches  its 
maximum  in  a  time  that  is  short  even  in  comparison  with  the  duration  of  the  blow. 
Assuming  an  average  total  momentum  of  45  units,  fig.  13  has  l>een  constructed.  The 


K> 


Pressure,  io4lbs  pereq.1 

_t;»*tnO»)*3 

|    \ 

Pressure  at  a  distance  of  \  inch 
FljJ.KJ.                        from  surface  of 
one  ounce  "dry  primer." 

\ 
X 

j 

\ 

1 
1 

1              1 

1 

I 

I 

X 
X 
X. 

2 

3    -—  V., 

1  2 

Time,  /o~asecs 

area  of  the  parallelogram  marked  1  represents  the  momentum  given  to  a  1-inch  piece, 
the  width  of  this  parallelogram  is  10"'  seconds  and  the  height  is  the  average  pressure 
acting  during  the  first  1Q-5  seconds.     The  parallelogram  marked  2  represents  the 
excess  of  the  momentum  given  to  the  2-inch  piece  over  that  given  to  the  1-inch  piece 
and  its  height  is  the  average  pressure  acting  during  the  second  10'*  seconds 
dotted  curve  gives  the  same  average  pressures  over  the  successive  intervals  of  time. 
It  is  obviously  largely  conjectural,  but  it  gives  a  rough  idea  both  of  the  max! 
pressure  and  of  the  duration  of  the  blow. 

The  chief  difficulty  experienced  hitherto  in  measuring  by  this  method  the  pn 
developed  in  the  detonation  of  gun-cotton  has  been  the  permanent  defonnation  of  the 
end  of  the  rod  by  the  blow.    No  steel  has  yet  been  discovered  which  will  stand,  wn 
flowing  or  cracking,  the  detonation  of  gun-cotton  in  contact  with  it,  and  even  wh. 


454         MB.  B.  HOPKINSON  ON  MEASURING  THE  PRESSURE  PRODUCED  IN  THE 

cushion  of  air  f  inch  thick  is  interposed  some  flow  takes  place.*  In  consequence  of 
this,  the  pressure  wave  which  emerges  and  is  propagated  elastically  cannot  he  quite  the 
same  as  the  wave  of  applied  pressure.  It  is  easy  to  see  that  the  general  effect  of  the 
setting  up  of  the  end  must  be  to  deaden  the  hlow,  that  is  to  reduce  the  maximum 
pressure  and  prolong  its  duration.  In  fig.  14,  A  is  the  (conjectural)  curve  representing 


Fig.14. 


Time    io'5  sees. 


the  pressure  applied  to  the  end  of  the  rod.  If  the  rod  were  perfectly  elastic,  the. 
pressure  across  a  section  2  inches  from  the  end  would  be  represented  on  the  same  time 
base  by  the  curve  B,  which  is  the  same  as  A,  but  moved  10~5  seconds  to  the  right. 
The  momentum  in  the  end  2  inches  at  any  time  is  the  difference  between  the  areas  of 
the  curves  up  to  that  time.  For  instance  at  2  x  10~5  seconds  it  is  represented  by  the 
shaded  area  under  curve  A.  But  if  the  end  be  not  completely  elastic,  the  higher 
pressures  developed  over  section  B  will  be  less  than  those  acting  on  the  end  at 
corresponding  times.  Thus  the  record  of  pressure  over  the  section  2  inches  from  the 
end  will  be  a  curve  such  as  B'  and  the  momentum  in  the  end  two  inches  at  any  time 
will  be  greater  than  it  would  be  if  the  end  were  elastic  by  the  difference  between  the 
areas  of  curves  B  and  B'  which  is  double  shaded  in  the  figure.  This  extra  momentum 
is  transferred  to  the  remainder  of  the  rod  later  on,  causing  the  curve  B'  to  rise  above 
B.  The  curve  B'  represents  the  wave  of  pressure  actually  sent  along  the  rod.  It  is 
this  curve  which  is  determined  by  the  method  which  has  been  described,  and  it  is 
evident  that  that  method  under-estimates  the  maximum  pressure  and  over-estimates 
the  duration  of  the  blow. 

A  few  experiments  were  made  with  the  gun-cotton  touching  the  end  of  the  shaft. 
The  average  total  momentum  given  to  the  shaft  and  piece  in  this  case  is  about 
90  units  or  roughly  twice  as  great  as  that  transmitted  through  f-inch  air-space.  Of 
this  total  about  80  per  cent,  is  caught  in  a  piece  4  inches  long,  and  about  50  per  cent, 
in  a  piece  1  inch  long.  When  the  gun-cotton  is  at  a  distance  of  f-inch  these  figures 
are  90  and  60  respectively.  The  apparent  duration  of  the  pressure  is  therefore 
rather  greater  at  the  surface  of  the  explosive.  The  setting  up  of  the  end  of  the 
shaft  is,  however,  much  more  marked  when  the  gun-cotton  is  in  contact  and  it  may 

h  This  is  when  the  steel  is  in  the  form  of  a  shaft,  so  that  there  is  no  lateral  support  of  the  part 
subjected  to  pressure.  It  is,  of  course,  possible  to  make  a  plate  with  hardened  face  which  will  withstand 
the  attack  of  gun-cotton  on  a  portion  of  the  face. 


DETONATION  OF  HIGH  EXPLOSIVES  OR  BY  THE  IMPACT  OF  BULLED).         455 


be  that  the  distribution  of  the  pressure  in  time  is  not  materially  different  in  the  two 
cases.  If  that  were  so,  the  maximum  pressure  developed  on  the  surface  of  the  gun- 
cotton  would  be  80  or  100  tons  per  square  inch. 

It  is  hoped  that  by  the  use  of  special  steels  it  may  be  possible  to  give  greater 
precision  to  these  estimates  of  the  amount  and  duration  of  the  pressure  produced  by 
the  detonation  of  gun-cotton  in  the  open.  Meanwhile  the  iiitbrmutioii  already 
obtained  as  to  the  order  of  magnitude  of  these  quantities  is  sufficient  to  throw  some 
lightvon  the  nature  of  the  fractures  produced.  The  general  result  obtained  may  be 
expressed  by  saying  that  a  gun-cotton  cylinder  1^  inches  x  !$•  inches  produces  at  ite 
surface,  when  detonated,  pressure  of  the  average  value  of  100,000  Ibs.  per  square 
inch  lasting  for  TToTooo  second.  Probably  figures  of  the  same  sort  of  magnitude  will 
describe  the  blow  produced  by  the  detonation  of  a  slab  1^  inches  thick,  one  of  whose 
faces  is  in  contact  with  a  steel  plate.  It  may  be  that  the  pressure  is  greater  and  the 
duration  correspondingly  less,  but  this  does  not  affect  the  point  that  the  pressure  is 
an  impulsive  one  in  its  effect  on  the  plate.  That  is,  the  effect  of  the  pressure  is  to 
give  velocity  to  the  parts  of  the  plate  with  which  the  gun-cotton  is  in  contact  but  the 
pressure  disappears  before  there  has  been  time  for  much  movement  to  take  place. 
For  instance,  if  the  plate  be  1  inch  thick  (mass  0'28  Ibs.  per  square  inch)  a  pressure 
of  100,000  Ibs.  per  square  inch  acting  on  it  for  5^jo  second  will  give  a  velocity  of 
about  230  feet  per  second,  and  while  the  pressure  is  being  applied  it  will  move 
0'028  inches. 

The  parts  of  the  plate  not  covered  by  the  gun-cotton  are  left  behind  and  the  strain 
set  up  by  the  forced  relative  displacement  is  the  cause  of  the  shattering  of  the  plate. 
The  magnitude  of  this  strain,    and   of  the   consequent   stress,  depends   (speaking 
generally),    on    the    relation    between    the    velocity    impressed    on    the    steel    by 
the  explosion  and  the  velocity  of  propagation  of  waves 
of  stress  into  the  material.     For  instance,  if  the  sec- 
tion AB  (fig.  15)  be  given  instantaneously  a  velocity 
of  200  feet  per  second  and  this  velocity  be  maintained, 
the  state   of  the   plate   after   the   lapse   of   10o!ooo 
second  will  be  that  represented  diagrammatically  by 
fig.   15.      The   section    AB  has  moved  forward  rela- 
tively to  the  remainder  by  0'002  feet.     As  soon  as 
this  section  started  moving  a  wave  of  shear  stress 
started  out  from  A  into  the  parts  of  the   plate  to 
the  left  which  had  been  left  at  rest  by  the  blow.     This  wave  travel 
11000    feet    per   second    and    will    therefore    in    1001OU»    "OOOd    get 
AC  =  O'll  feet.     To  the  left  of  C  the  metal  has  not  moved,  the  wave  not  hu 

reached  it ;  therefore  the  average  shear  in  the  section  AC  is  -— 

forces  of  this  durationl  even  mild  steel  has  nearly   perfect  elasticity   up   to  very 


A 

B 

I 

SteeL 

Gun-ooUiwt. 

23 

_  1 

1  '  : 

Vetoc&on/aec 

'Atn*t] 

—  \oa 

C-   A 

~   Fig.L 

5.; 

456  MR.  B.  HOPKINSON  ON  MEASURING  THE  PRESSURE,  ETC. 

high  stresses.*  If  it  maintained  its  elasticity  and  continuity  the  shearing  stress 
would  be  of  the  order  O'OIS  x  1'2  x  107,  or  say  220,000  Ibs.  or  100  tons  per  square  inch. 
This  illustration  is  of  course  very  far  from  representing  the  actual  effect  of  suddenly 
giving  velocity  to  a  portion  of  a  plate,  the  real  distribution  of  stress  would  be  far 
more  complicated,  but  it  gives  an  idea  of  the  magnitude  of  the  stresses  which  may  be 
expected  to  arise.  In  static  tests  on  mild  steel,  the  material  begins  to  flow  as 
soon  as  the  shearing  stress  exceeds  about  10  tons  per  square  inch  and  no  stress 
materially  greater  than  this  can  exist.  But  when  the  metal  is.  forcibly  deformed  at  a 
sufficiently  high  speed  the  shearing  stress  is  increased  by  something  analogous  to 
viscosity  and  the  tensile  stress  which  accompanies  it  may  be  sufficient  to  break  down 
the  forces  of  cohesion  and  tear  the  molecules  apart.  Thus  the  steel  is  cracked,  though 
in  ordinary  static  tests  it  can  stretch  20-30  per  cent,  without  rupture,  just  as  pitch, 
which  can  flow  indefinitely  if  given  time,  is  cracked  by  the  blow  of  a  hammer.  The 
essence  of  the  matter  is  the  forcible  straining  of  the  substance  at  a  velocity  so  high 
that  it  behaves  as  an  elastic  solid  rather  than  as  a  fluid,  thus  experiencing  stresses 
which  are  measured  by  the  strain  multiplied  by  the  modulus  of  elasticity.  The  effect 
of  gun-cotton  on  mild  steel  shows  that  in  this  material  a  rate  of  shear  of  the  order 
1000  radians  per  second  is  sufficient  to  cause  cracking. 

The  most  probable  account  of  the  smashing  of  a  mild  steel  plate  by  gun-cotton  is, 
then,  that  the  plate  is  cracked  before  it  has  appreciably  deformed,  the  cracks  being 
caused  by  relative  velocity  given  impulsively  to  different  parts  of  the  plate.  Bending 
of  the  broken  pieces  occurs  after  the  plate  has  cracked  and  the  pieces  have 
separated  from  one  another.  It  is  due  to  relative  velocity  in  different  portions  of  each 
piece  which  still  persists  after  the  initial  fracture,  and  is  taken  up  as  a  permanent  set 
in  each  piece.  In  this  connection  the  fracture  shown  in  fig.  11  is  instructive.  It 
will  be  noticed  that  the  general  bend  of  the  plate,  after  the  pieces  have  been  fitted 
together,  is  opposite  to  that  which  might  at  first  sight  be  expected  as  the  result  of 
the  blow  in  the  middle.  Inspection  of  such  fractures  leads  to  the  conclusion  just 
stated  as  to  their  history.  The  experiments  on  gun-cotton  pressures  described  in  this 
paper,  though  lacking  in  precision,  supply  I  think  the  missing  link  in  an  explanation 
which  is  otherwise  probable,  namely,  sufficient  evidence  that  the  blow  may  be  regarded 
as  an  impulsive  force  communicating  velocity  instantaneously. 

Most  of  the  experimental  work  described  in  this  paper  was  done  by  my  assistant, 
Mr.  H.  QUINNEY.  I  also  received  valuable  help  in  the  earlier  stages  from 
Mr.  A.  D.  BROWNE,  of  Queens'  College,  and  from  my  brother  Mr.  K.  C.  HOPKINSON, 
Trinity  College.  To  these  gentlemen  I  wish  to  express  my  obligation  for  aid  without 
which  it  would  hardly  have  been  possible  to  carry  out  a  research  of  this  character.  I 
have  also  to  thank  Sir  EGBERT  HADFIELD,  Mr.  W.  H.  ELLIS,  and  Major  STRANGE  for 
providing  steel  plates  and  shafts. 

*  HOPKINSON,  'Roy.  Soc.  Proc.,'  74,  p.  498. 


[     457     ] 


XI.  Gravitational  Instability  and  the  Nebulir  /  /  i//tothesi*. 

x 

By  J.  H.  JEANS,  M.A.,  F.R.S. 

Received  October  22,— Read  Novemlwr  27,  1913. 

Introduction. 

§  1.  A  CONSIDERATION  of  the  processes  of  cosmogony  demands  an  extensive  knowledge 
of  the  behaviour  of  rotating  astronomical  matter.  What  knowledge  we  have  is 
based  upon  the  researches  of  MACLAURIN,  JACOBI,  POINCARE,  and  DARWIX.  These 
researches  refer  solely  to  matter  which  is  perfectly  homogeneous  and  incompressible, 
although  it  is,  of  course,  known  that  the  primordial  astronomical  matter  must  be  far 
from  homogeneous  and  probably  highly  compressible  as  well.  The  question  of  how 
far  we  are  justified  in  attributing  to  real  matter  the  behaviour  which  is  found  to  be 
true  for  incompressible  and  homogeneous  matter  is  obviously  one  of  great  importance. 

§  2.  There  are  d  priori  reasons  for  expecting  that  there  will  be  wide  differences 
between  the  two  cases.  Consider  first  a  sphere  of  homogeneous  incompressible 
matter  devoid  of  rotation.  This  will  be  stable  if  every  small  displacement  increases 
(or,  at  least,  does  not  decrease)  its  potential  energy.  The  sphere  has  a  number  of 
independent  possible  small  displacements  which  can  be  measured  by  the  number  of 
harmonics  which  can  be  represented  on  its  surface.  The  spherical  configuration  is 
known  to  be  stable  because  it  can  be  shown  that  every  one  of  these  displacements 
increases  the  potential  energy. 

Contrast  this  case  with  the  corresponding  one  in  which  the  matter  is  compressible. 
The  number  of  possible  small  displacements  in  this  latter  case  is  measured  by  the 
sum  of  the  numbers  of  harmonics  which  can  be  represented  on  all  the  sphencal 
s^lrfaces  inside  the  sphere.  Let  R  be  the  radius  of  the  outer  surface  ;  let  r,  r1,  r",  ... 
be  the  radii  of  all  the  spheres  which  can  be  drawn  inside  this  outer  sphere, 
and  let  r»,  r'n,  /'„  ...  R,  be  the  number  of  independent  harmonics  which  can  be 
represented  on  these  spheres.  To  prove  that  the  sphere  is  stable  it  is  now  necessary 
to  prove  that  every  one  of  the  rB +?',  +  /',,+  ...  R.  possible  displacements  increases 
the  potential  energy.  If  we  argue  by  analogy  from  the  case  of  an  incompressible 
sphere  we  are,  in  effect,  merely  considering  R.  of  these  displacements  and  neglecting 
the  much  greater  number  rn+ 1\ +r"n+  ....  Furthermore,  in  these  neglected  dis- 
placements, the  nature  of  the  displacement  is  essentially  different  from  that  in  the 

VOL.  CCXIII.-A  507.  3  N  ™>ii.h.d  «p.»t.i7.  rebm.rr  a,  11.14. 


458  MR.   J.    H.  JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

RB  displacements,  so  that  there  appears  to  be  no  justification  at  all  for  an  argument 
from  analogy. 

In  each  of  the  neglected  displacements,  the  change  in  the  potential  energy  will 
consist  of  two  terms.  There  will  be  a  change  in  the  elastic  energy  of  the 
compressible  material,  and  this  can  be  easily  shown  to  involve  an  increase  in  the 
potential  energy.  There  will,  in  addition,  be  a  change  in  the  gravitational  energy, 
and  this  can  be  shown*  to  involve  invariably  a  decrease  in  the  energy.  If  W,  E,  G 
denote  the  total,  the  elastic,  and  the  gravitational  potential  energies, 


in  which  SG  is  invariably  negative.  The  condition  for  stability  is  that  for  every 
possible  displacement  £E  shall  be  numerically  greater  than  SG. 

It  might  naturally  be  thought  that  by  considering  a  system  in  which  the  matter 
was,  so  to  speak,  very  gravitational  or  very  little  elastic  we  could  have  JE  small  or 
SG  great,  and  so  should  have  instability  of  the  spherical  configuration.  But  it  must 
be  remembered  that  the  gravitation  and  the  elasticity  of  the  matter  are  not 
independently  at  our  disposal.  The  action  of  the  gravitational  forces  tends  to 
concentrate  the  matter  and  so  involves  that  the  elasticity  becomes  large  in  the 
equilibrium  configuration.  If  we  consider  a  system  in  which  the  elasticity  is 
artificially  kept  small,  as,  for  instance,  by  adding  an  additional  repulsive  field  of  force 
to  annul,  or  partially  annul,  the  gravitational  field,  we  can  easily  construct  systems 
for  which  a  spherical  configuration  is  unstable,!  but,  short  of  this,  it  appears  to  be  a 
general  law  that  the  elastic  and  gravitational  agencies  must  march  together  in  such  a 
way  that  £E  is  always  numerically  greater  than  <5G,|  so  that  every  natural  spherical 
system  is  stable. 

The  nearest  approach  in  nature  to  the  artificial  repulsive  field  imagined  above  is 
found  in  the  influence  of  rotation.  This  influence  may  be  represented  by  the  super- 
position of  the  usual  repulsive  field  of  centrifugal  force  of  potential  —  %w2(x2  +  y2). 
The  field  is  not  spherical,  and  so  the  figures  of  equilibrium  obtained  under  its  influence 
cannot  be  spherical.  But  it  can  be  regarded  as  made  up  of  a  spherical  part  —  §wV 
and  a  superposed  harmonic  disturbance  fyufPtf*.  The  first  term  is  certainly  a 
spherical  repulsive  field,  and  will,  of  course,  tend  to  annul  the  concentrating  influence 
of  gravitation.  The  problem  which  requires  study  is  that  of  how  far,  or  in  what 
circumstances,  the  presence  of  rotation  can  disturb  the  otherwise  general  law  that  SIS, 
is  always  greater  than  SG. 

The  problem  is  one  of  enormous  complexity  and  great  generality.  It  will  hardly 
be  expected  that  the  present  paper  will  contain  anything  approaching  a  general 

*  Of.  J.  H.  JEANS,  "The  Stability  of  a  Spherical  Nebula,"  'Phil.  Trans.,'  A,  vol.  199,  p.  1. 
t  Of.  J.  H.  JEANS,  "On  the  Vibrations  and  Stability  of  a  Gravitating  Planet,"  'Phil.   Trans.,'  A, 
vol.  201,  p.  157. 

J  Cf.  below,  §§11,  22. 


AND   THE   NEBULAR    HYPOTHESIS.  459 

solution,  and  it  may  as  well  be  stated  at  once  that  it  does  not.  All  I  have  been  able 
to  do  is  to  grope  after  general  principles  by  solving  a  problem  here  and  a  problem 
there  as  seemed  needful  to  illuminate  a  possible  path  towards  a  general  theory,  and 
the  present  paper  is  confined  to  a  very  few  of  the  special  problems  I  have  considered, 
but  I  have  selected  those  which  seemed  to  have  most  bearing  on  the  general  question 
in  hand. 

v 

Medium  in  which  the  Pressure  is  a  Function  <>f  ///'•  7>c//.v/V//. 

§  3.  In  the  most  general  astronomical  medium  the  pressure  is,  of  course,  not  a 
function  of  the  density.  The  relation  between  pressure  and  density  varies  from 
point  to  point,  partly  on  account  of  inequalities  of  temperature  and  partly  on  account 
of  variations  of  chemical  constitution.  But  no  general  theory  can  l>e  expected  to 
apply  to  the  most  general  heterogeneous  mass  of  matter  possible,  and  before  any 
general  theory  can  be  deduced  we  must  have  material  from  which  to  deduce  it. 

§  4.  The  simple  system  from  which  we  shall  start  will  be  a  system  in  which  the 
matter  is  homogeneous  as  regards  its  properties,  so  that  at  all  points  the  pressure 
and  density  will  be  connected  by  the  same  relation.  It  will  be  seen  later  (§  1  5)  how 
it  is  possible,  in  at  least  one  important  respect,  to  escape  from  this  limitation. 

For  the  present  we  assume  the  pressure  and  density  to  be  connected  by  the 
relation 

0) 


at  every  point.     We  take  the  centre  of  gravity  of  the  rotating  mass  to  be  the  origin, 
and  the  axis  of  rotation  to  be  the  axis  of  z.     The  equations  of  equilibrium  are 


=       +  i(f 

r 


in  which  V  is  the  potential  of  the  whole  gravitational  field  of  force.     In  virtue  of 
relation  (l),  these  equations  have  the  common  integral 

.........     (2) 


in  which  «>  stands  for  *+*  and  ,(,)  for  j<fe,  which  is  by  hypothesis  a  function  of 


3  N  2 


460  MR.   J.   H.   JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

p  only.     There  is  further  the  relation  of  POISSON, 

V2V  =  -4^,  ...........      (4) 

so  that  on  operating  on  (3)  with  V2  we  obtain 

2w\  ..........     (5) 


the    differential   equation    which    must    be    satisfied    by  p   in    any  configuration  of 
equilibrium  under  a  rotation  w. 

§  5.  In  general  a  solution  of  equation  (5)  will  involve  negative  and  zero  values  of  p- 
In  the  physical  problem  p  will  be  limited  as  to  values,  and  this  limitation  will 
determine  the  physical  boundary  of  the  rotating  mass. 

Let  Vm  denote  the  gravitational  potential  at  any  point  in  space  of  the  finite  mass 
determined  in  this  way.  We  have  found  a  configuration  of  equilibrium  under  a 
potential  V,  the  potential  of  the  mass  is  Vm,  so  that  for  equilibrium  we  require  an 
additional  field  of  potential  V—  Vm.  We  can  say  that  the  configuration  found  will 
be  a  true  configuration  of  equilibrium  under  an  external  field  of  force  of  potential  V0 
such  that 

(6) 


And,  inasmuch  as  V2Vm  =  —4^/0  =  V2V,  it  is  clear  that  V2V0  =  0,  so  that  the 
external  field  has  poles  only  at  the  origin  or  at  infinity.  The  condition  that  any 
solution  shall  lead  to  a  configuration  of  equilibrium  for  a  mass  rotating  free  from 
external  influence  is,  of  course,  V0  =  0. 

§  6.  The  simplest  solution  of  equation  (5)  is  obviously  that  in  which  p  is  a  function 
of  r  only,  but  it  is  clear  from  (3)  that  this  cannot  give  a  free  solution  except  when 
w  =  0. 

§  7.  The  next  simplest  form  of  solution  is  that  in  which  p  is  a  function  of  z  and  w 
only,  and  this  can  give  a  free  solution.  It  includes,  of  course,  as  a  particular  case 
the  system  of  Maclaurin  spheroids.  For  this  class  of  solutions  every  section  at  right 
angles  to  the  axis  of  z  is  circular,  and  in  any  such  section  the  lines  of  equal  density 
are  circles.  The  density  at  any  point  is  of  the  form  p  =/(&,  z). 

Let  O  denote  colatitude  measured  from  Oz,  and  let  \}r  be  azimuth  measured  from 
the  plane  of  xz.  The  most  general  configuration  which  can  be  obtained  by  displace- 
ment of  that  just  considered  will  have  a  law  of  density  of  the  form 

GO 

P=fo  (w,  *)+   2/5  (w,  z)  COS  S\fr. 


It  is  easily  seen  that  the  separate  cosine  terms  lead  to  independent  displacements, 
and  we  shall  for  the  moment  only  consider  the  displacement  of  the  first  order,  for 
which  the  law  of  density  is 

P  =/o(w,  z)+/(w,  z)cos^,     ........     (7) 


where/!  (ra,  z)  is  a  small  quantity  of  the  first  order. 


AND   THE    NEBULAR    HYPOTHESIS.  461 

The  boundary  being  a  surface  of  constant   pressure   must  also  be  a  surface  of 
constant  density,  say  o-.     The  equation  of  the  boundary  is  accordingly 


,  z)ao6\l,  =  <r  .....    ....     (8) 

The  whole  mass  inside  this  boundary  may  be  regarded  as  composed  of  coaxial  rings 
of  matter  as  follows.  Inside  the  figure  of  revolution  /0  (m,  2)  =  <r,  we  suppose  there 
to  be  a  series  of  rings  of  density  given  by  (7),  while  the  surface  inequality  can  be 
regarded  as  represented  by  the  presence  of  rings  on  this  figure  of  revolution  of 
density  proportional  to  cos  \[r. 

On  integration  the  potential  Vm  at  any  external  point  is  seen  to  be  of  the  form 


osi/'  ...........     (9) 

where  xo>  Xi  are  functions  of  w  and  2  only. 

Suppose  now  that  the  surface  is  so  nearly  spherical  that  spherical  harmonic  analysis 
may  be  used  with  reference  to  it,  then,  since  Vm  is  a  solution  of  LAPLACE'S  equation  at 
all  external  points,  and  is  also  of  the  form  (9),  it  must  be  of  the  form 


(10) 


where  M  =  cos  6,  and  P,1  (/x)  is  the  usual  tesseral  harmonic  —  P,  (/u).     Moreover,  since 

t*\j 

the  centre  of  gravity  of  the  mass  is  supposed  to  coincide  with  the  origin,  AI  must 
vanish. 

We  have,  from  equation  (3),  if  V  =  Vm, 


v  = 


» 


,  z)  cos  +  +'  {/„(«,  z)}  - 

at   all   internal   points.      Equating   these   two  expressions,   we   must   have   at  the 
boundary 


or,  neglecting  small  quantities  of  the  second  order, 


Hence  either  /,  (w,  z)  vanishes  at  the  boundary  or  is  of  at  least  the  second  order  of 

harmonics. 

It  follows  that  if  there  can  be  a  configuration  of  equilibrium  which  dil 
figuration  of  revolution  P  =f.(w,  2),  by  a  displacement  proportional  to  the  first 


con 


462  MR.   J.   H.   JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

harmonic,  this  configuration  must  be  one  in  which  /J  (w,  z)  vanishes  at  the  boundary, 
so  that  the  boundary  must  be  a  figure  of  revolution  about  the  axis  of  rotation. 

It  now  follows  from  (3)  that  V  must  be  a  function  of  w    and   z   only  on  the 
boundary,  and  hence  also  (since  V  is  harmonic)  at  all  external  points.     It  follows 


that  -7—  ,  and  hence  also  -£-  ,  are  functions  of  is,  z  only  at  the  boundary.     Whence 

rin  en 

again,  by  equations  (4)  and  (5),  it  follows  that  —  -  and  -^  are  functions  only  of  TS 

and  z  at  the  boundary.  And,  by  successive  differentiation  of  equations  (4)  and  (5), 
it  is  seen  that  all  the  differential  coefficients  of  V  and  p  are  functions  only  of  rs  and  z 
at  the  boundary. 

It  can  be  seen  from  this*  that  the  configuration  must  be  one  of  revolution  through- 
out. In  other  words,  there  can  be  no  configuration  of  equilibrium  which  differs  from 
the  configuration  of  revolution  by  first  harmonic  terms  only. 

LAPLACE'S  Law. 

§  8.  I  have  not  found  that  any  progress  worth  recording  can  be  made  with  the 
general  relation^?  =f(p),  so  that  progress  can  only  be  hoped  for  by  examining  special 
cases. 

The  case  that  suggests  itself  as  most  important  is  that  of  the  gas  law  p  =  Kp, 
satisfied  in  a  perfectly  gaseous  nebula  at  uniform  temperature.  The  difficulty  is  that 
such  a  nebula  extends  to  infinity  in  all  directions,  and  so  cannot  rotate  as  a  rigid 
body.  Or  rather,  when  it  is  caused  to  rotate,  it  throws  off  its  equatorial  portions 
and  the  remainder  rotates  in  the  shape  of  an  elongated  spindle  of  infinite  length.  In 
this  connection  I  have  worked  out  the  purely  two-dimensional  problem  of  a  rotating 
gaseous  cylinder  of  infinite  length.  The  results  are  too  long  to  be  worth  printing  ; 
it  will,  perhaps,  suffice  to  record  that  the  analysis  bears  out  in  full  the  conclusions 
arrived  at  in  this  paper. 

The  law  which  is  most  amenable  to  mathematical  treatment  is  LAPLACE'S  law 


or,  as  it  is  more  convenient  to  write  it, 


(12) 


in  which  c,  p,  K,  and  a  are  constants,  <r  being  the  value  of  the  density  at  the  free 


* 


I    have    not    succeeded    in    obtaining    a    rigorous    proof    of    this.      It   might    be   objected   that 
nothing  in    the   above   argument  precludes   first  harmonic   terms   proportional   to  such   a   function  as 

«  ~f(w,  :)  ,  where  /(cr,  g)  =  0  is  the  equation  of  the  boundary.  The  pure  mathematician  may  not, 
although  the  astronomer  will,  be  influenced  by  the  consideration  that  such  functions  never  occur  in  natural 
problems.  If  such  a  function  did  occur,  it  would  involve  an  extremely  fantastic  relation  between  p  and  p. 


AND   THE   NEBULAR    HYPOTHESIS.  p;  , 

surface.  This  law  has  the  merit  that  the  case  of  an  incompressible  fluid  is  covered 
by  the  special  value  c  =  oo  or  K  =  0,  the  density  now  having  the  value  a  throughout. 

There  is  the  d  priori  objection  to  the  kw  that  its  form  precludes  first  harmonic 
displacements  (rf.  below,  §11).  This  objection  would  be  fatal  were  it  not  that  we 
have  seen  that  first  harmonic  displacements  are  in  any  case  of  no  importance.  This 
being  so,  the  objection  falls  to  the  ground,  and  I  have  thought  it  worth  working  out 
this-law  as  far  as  possible. 

§  9.  Using  the  relation  (12),  we  have  in  place  of  the  more  general  equations  (3),  (4), 
and  (5),  the  particular  equations 


(13) 

VV  =  -4*7>, 


On  putting 
this  last  equation  reduces  to 


(17) 


No  Rotation. 

* 

§  10.  When  there  is  no  rotation  w  =  0,  x  =  p  and  the  equation  becomes 

(V'nV)  />  =  (). 

The  general  solution  is 

P-ZA.r-'tf.+.fcGtr)^..    • 

while  the  particular  solution  giving  a  spherical  boundary  is 


the  last  being,  of  course,  the  well-known  solution  which  occurs  in  LAPLACE'S  theory 
of  the  figure  of  the  earth.     It  will  now  be  shown  that  this  configurat, 


8  a   be   the  free  surface  corresponding  to  the  simple  solution  (19). 
Consider  an  adjacent  solution 


and  let  the  corresponding  free  surface  be 


464  MR.   J.   H.   JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

On  substituting  this  value  for  /•  in  (20),  neglecting  squares  of  b  and  equating 
corresponding  harmonic  terms,  we  obtain 

A  '/   T       /         \  A,.        SHI  Kd  lnc^\ 

<r  =  AOGT  M./.  (irf*)  =  -7=-      -,    .......     (22) 


-  {«-'/'  J,/2(*«)  I  =  *A0/,>a-'M,/2  (Ka),  .     .     .     (23) 
whence 

6y  =  A.a-1^J»^MJ'/.M  ......  (24) 

*  J»/,  (*  «) 

By  integration,  the  value  of  Vm  at  a  point  on  the  sphere  r  =  a  is  found  to  be 

v-  - 


A      _+8/2  JB+y,  (<ra)  Jy,  (<ra)  o 

" 


while  the  value  of  V,  as  given  by  equation  (13),  is 

V  =  ^a-'/'J  1,M+^a-1/2J»+-,MS1,+  cons. 

AC  AC 

If  we  put 

V-Vm  =  v  =  w0  +  v,S« 

we  obtain,  after  some  reduction, 

/  \  J,+./.MJ./.M 

l 


In  general,  this  gives  the  value  of  An  which  determines  the  tide  raised  by  a  field  of 

/r\* 
potential  vn(-j  8,  proportional  to  SB.     We  notice  that  when  n  =  1,  vn  =  0  or  AB  =  oo 


\a/ 

independently  of  the  values  of  /c,  a.  This  merely  expresses  the  obvious  fact  that 
there  can  be  no  equilibrium  at  all  so  long  as  the  fluid  is  acted  on  by  a  force 
proportional  to  a  harmonic  of  the  first  order. 

If  it  is  possible  for  there  to  be  a  configuration  of  equilibrium  when  vn  =  0,  other 
than  that  given  by  AB  =  0,  this  configuration  will  of  course  determine  a  point  of 
bifurcation  in  the  series  of  symmetrical  configurations.  The  points  of  bifurcation  are 
accordingly  given  by  vn  =  0,  or  by 

Jn-'/g  (KO)  _  Jy,  (KO) 
•*»+'/,(*«)        J'/2(*«)' 

For  brevity  in  printing,  let  us  introduce  the  function  un  defined  by 


AND  TIIK   M.r.i  I..M; 


ir,  , 


Near  KO,  =  0,  ?<„  =  r-^— ;  the  value  of  w,  is cot  *a,  and  successive  u's  satisfy 

itflt  ~|~  \.  ^ '  £ 

the  difference-equation 

.T-     '  '  W 


K<t 


With  the  help  of  these  properties  it  is  easy  to  draw  approximate  graphs  of  the 
curves  y  =  un.  Such  a  graph,  for  values  of  KO,  up  to  the  first  zero  of  «,  (««  =  4'49)  is 
represented  in  fig.  1,  in  which  the  vertical  scale  is  2^  times  the  horizontal  scale. 


Fig.  1.     Graphs  of  the  functions  u,,. 

In  terms  of  these  functions,  the  points  of  bifurcation  are  given  by  «„  = 
once  evident  that  there  is  no  root  of  this  equation  for  values  of*,  less  than  , 
therefore  (cf.  equation  (19))  no  point  of  bifurcation  at  all  so  long  as  ,  is  nrtric 
being  always  positive.     It  follows  that  the  spherical  configura 
displacements. 

Small  Rotation. 

§  12    When  the  fluid  experiences  a  slight  rotation  w,  the  spherical  configuration  is 
of  course  slightly  flattened.     The  appropriate  solution  of  equal 

-•M«.(«r)P,.  (29) 


x  = 


VOL.  CCXI1I. — A. 


3  o 


466  ME.   J.   H.  JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

where  P2  is  the  second  zonal  harmonic  about  the  axis  of  rotation  as  6  =  0.    Assuming 
the  free  surface  to  be 

r  =  a  +  bP2,  ......     .....     (30) 

the  equations  analogous  to  (22),  (23),  and  (24)  are  found  to  be 

or-I^Aoa-'/'J^M,  ..'.-.•  ......     (31) 

A2a-'/8Js/2(fc«)  =  K^la-^S^Ko),     ........     (32) 


**     .  (33) 

l  W     \T      /       \ 

1-  —  «M««) 

- 


Let  v  be  given  by 

v  =  V+ty>w'-Vm  =  V-V,,I  +  ^V(1-P2), 
then,  instead  of  equation  (25),  we  have 


(34) 


in  which  constant  terms  are  omitted,  and  the  value  is  taken  on  the  sphere  r  =  a. 
For  a  configuration  of  equilibrium  under  no  external  field  of  force  we  must  have 
V  =  Vm,  and  therefore  v  in  equation  (34)  equal  to  -^wVP2.  Neglecting  squares 

of  w2,  and  therefore  omitting  the  factor  1  -  ^—  in  the  denominator,  the  equation 

ZTTIT 

becomes 


(35) 


giving  A2  in  terms  of  w2,  when  w2  is  small.  It  will  be  readily  verified  that  this 
equation  is  identical  with  that  obtained  by  THOMSON  and  TAIT  ('Nat.  Phil.,'  §824, 
equation  (14)). 

§  13.  We  next  examine  the  solution 

w2 

X  =  /'-^  =  A0r-^J1/2(^-)  +  A2r-^Js/2(^)P2  +  ABr-1/-JB+1,(/cr)SB,   .     .     (36) 

which  is  appropriate  to  a  mass  of  fluid  having  a  rotation  w  given  by  equation  (35), 
and  acted  on  by  a  field  of  force  of  potential  vn$a.  By  analysis  exactly  similar  to 
that  just  given,  we  obtain  at  r  =  a 


AND    THE    NEBULAR    HYPOTHESIS.  457 

This  gives  A,  for  the  general  tide  raised  by  the  field  vnSm.     The  condition  for  a 

point  of  bifurcation  is  ?>„  =  0,  or 


.......  •-  .....  <38> 

Thus  the  points  of  bifurcation,  if  any,  are  still  determined  by  the  intersections  of 
the  graphs  in  fig.  1,  except  that  the  graph  of  «,  must  be  supposed  decreased  vertically 

o 

in  the  ratio  1  --  —  to  1  . 

27T<7 

We  may,  if  we  please,  imagine  that  we  start  with  very  small  rotation,  and  allow  the 
rotation  progressively  to  increase,  this  increase  being  accompanied  in  imagination  by  a 
greater  and  greater  flattening  of  the  graph  of  u,. 

It  is  clear  that  under  all  circumstances  the  curve  which  will  first  be  intersected  by 
the  flattened  graph  of  ?<,  will  be  the  graph  of  u3.  It  is  further  clear  that  the 
requisite  value  of  iv*  is  least  when  *a  =  0,  and  progressively  increases  as  *a  increases,  . 
at  any  rate  up  to  KO,  =  TT. 

This  means  that  in  the  first  place  the  circular  vibration  will  invariably  become 
unstable  through  a  vibration  proportional  to  a  second  harmonic,  so  that  the  first  point 
of  bifurcation  reached  will  be  one  such  that  the  spheroidal  form  gives  place  to  an 
ellipsoidal  form.  If  the  rotation  is  so  small  that  the  problem  may  be  treated  as  a 
statical  one,  there  will  be  no  question  as  to  there  being  an  actual  exchange  of 
stabilities  at  the  point  of  bifurcation,  for  clearly  vn  changes  sign  at  this  point.  Thus 
for  rotation  greater  than  that  at  the  point  of  bifurcation,  the  spheroidal  form  will  be 
definitely  unstable,  and  the  ellipsoidal  form  definitely  stable,  at  least  until  the  next 
point  of  bifurcation  is  reached. 

Our  result  shows,  in  the  second  place,  that  the  masses  which  become  ellipsoidal  for 
the  smallest  values  of  it?  are  those  for  which  *a  is  smallest.  To  put  it  briefly,  the 
mass  which  is  most  unstable  when  it  begins  to  rotate  is  the  incompressible  mass  —  a 
somewhat  unexpected  result. 

For  any  value  of  *•«,  the  value  which  iff1  must  have  for  the  spheroidal  form  to 
become  unstable  is  (cf.  equation  (38)) 


and  when  Ka  =  0,  the  value  of  u-Ju^  =  I  (cf.  §  4). 

Thus  our  equations  would  make  the  spheroidal  mass  of  incompressible  fluid  first 

become  unstable  when  £-  =  "400,  but  these  equations  have  only  been  obtained  on 

Zww 

the  supposition  that  —  is  so  small  that  its  squares  may  be  neglected,  a  supposition 

2x<r 

which   is   now   seen   d  posteriori  to   be   hardly   admissible.     Probably  the   result 
obtained  are  qualitatively  true,  but  quantitatively  unreliable.     In  point  of  fact  the 


3  O  2 


468  MR.  J.   H.  JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

first  point  of  bifurcation  for  an  incompressible  mass,   instead  of  being   given    by 

o  2 

=  '400,  is  known  to  be  given  by  the  widely  different  value  ^—  =  '1871. 

2?rfr 


Our  analysis  has  nevertheless  proved  rigorously  the  point  which  is  really  most 
important,  namely,  that  there  can  be  no  point  of  bifurcation  at  all  for  quite  small 

Q 

values  of  -t    —  .    At  the  same  time,  since  the  question  of  when  and  how  a  rotating  mass 


first  becomes  unstable  is  one  of  considerable  importance,  I  have  attempted  to  obtain 
a  more  reliable  investigation  than  the  preceding.  I  have  found  that  the  accuracy  is 
not  greatly  improved  by  taking  the  analysis  as  far  as  squares  of  w2/27r<7,  while  the 
labour  of  working  with  a  general  power  series  would  be  appalling.  I  have,  therefore, 
reluctantly  been  compelled  to  give  up  hopes  of  carrying  the  rigorous  solution  of  the 
problem  further  in  this  direction,  but  have  thought  it  worth  while  to  examine  the 
analogous  problem  for  rotating  cylindrical  masses.  All  the  essential  physical  features 
of  the  natural  three-dimensional  problem  appear  to  be  reproduced  in  the  simpler 
cylindrical  problem,  so  that  it  seems  legitimate  to  hope  that  an  argument  by  analogy 
may  not  lead  to  entirely  erroneous  result. 

Cylindrical  Masses  in  Rotation. 

§  14.  The  fundamental  equations  are,  of  course,  the  first  two  of  the  equations 

already  written  down  in  §  3.     The  third  equation  does  not  occur,  since  -'-  =  0.     The 

oz 

equations  have,  as  before,  the  integral  (13)  leading  to  the  differential  equation  (15) 
for  p. 

The  most  general  solution  possible  will  be 


=     -+  Z  AnJn(^)cos(^-e),   .......     (40) 


0 


in  which  r  now  stands  for  \/(x2+ya).     No  matter  how  great  the  rotation,  there  is 
always  a  special  circular  solution 

«r),       .........     (41) 


this  being  analogous  to  the  spheroidal  figures  of  equilibrium  investigated  in  §  12. 
Let  us  examine  the  deformed  solution 

• 

p  =  ^-+AoJ0(/cr)+ABJB(/cr)cosn0,  .......     (42) 

/TT 

in  which  AB  is  supposed  small,  but  there  are  no  restrictions  on  the  value  of  —  .     If 

2?r 
the  free  surface  p  =  or  is  supposed  given  by  (cf.  equations  (21)  and  (30)) 

r  =  a  +  b  cosn6, 


AND    THE    NEBULAR   HYPOTHESIS.  ,,,  ., 

then,  as  in  equations  (31)  and  (32),  a  and  b  must  satisfy 


m.      .     .     .  .......     (43) 

AAOta)  =  -' 

whence 


b-A. 


The  potential  of  the  mass,  Vm,  can  be  regarded  as  arising  from  a  distribution  of 
density  P  inside  the  cylinder  r  =  a,  together  with  a  surface  density  b<r  cos  n0  spread 
over  the  surface  of  the  cylinder. 

The  first  part  of  the  potential,  evaluated  at  R,  6,  is 

G~  jj[log  {7J  +  R2-2rft  cos  (0-6)}]  [j£  +  Vo  (<r)  +  A.J.  (*r)  cos  n01r drde 

ri°r  ™    ^  ~i  r  «* 

=  0-2       logR-2  -  rcoss(0-0)          +  A0J0(*r)+A 
JJ|_  i    slv  JL2» 

f"  2?r  7*" 

=  A.n  )      -  r-j  JB  (AT?-)  r  dr  cos  n6  +  terms  independent  of  0 

-  ABJn+1  (*«)  — —  cos  n0+  terms  independent  of  0. 
The  potential  of  the  surface  distribution  is 

so  that,  at  r  =  a, 

v.  =  { 

I  Kn 
while,  by  equation  (5), 

If,  as  before,  we  express  the  tide-generating  potential  V-V.  in  the  form 
Vt>+vn  cos  «0,  we  obtain  for  the  value  of  vn,  at  R  =  a, 


ABJB+1  («o)+    2*      cos  n6+  terms  independent  of  6, 

H        ) 


11 

(45) 


-       J,M 

2x«r/ 
It  will  be  seen  that  this  equation  is  exactly  analogous  to  the  former  equation  (37), 


470 


MR.   J.   H.   JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 


but  with  the  important  difference  that  the  present  equation  is  true  for  all  values  of 
w3,  without  limit.     The  points  of  bifurcation  are  given  by  vn  =  0,  or 

'W>'\-        I       \  (AR\ 

••/,(*«), I4°) 


«.-'/,  M^1- 

which  again  is  exactly  analogous  to  the  former  equation  (38).     The  graphs  of  the 
functions  •%„  M>/2,  . . .  will  be  found  to  lie  as  in  fig.  2,  and  we  may  again  imagine  that 


0-8  - 


0-6  - 


0-4  - 


0-Z  - 


JC=0 


123 

Fig.  2.     Graphs  of  the  functions 


points  of  bifurcation  are  sought  by  flattening  the  curve  u\tt  until  it  intersects  the 
other  curves. 

It  is  clear  that,  under  all  circumstances,  the  first  curve  to  be  intersected  will  be 
the  curve  u>tl,  corresponding  to  a  displacement  proportional  to  cos  20.  Thus,  as 
before,  when  the  circular  form  becomes  unstable,  it  gives  place  to  a  form  of  elliptic 
cross-section,  which  is  stable.  Moreover,  the  smaller  *a  is  the  lower  the  value  of 
•M^JTTO-  for  which  the  circular  form  becomes  unstable. 

These  results  are  true  without  any  regard  to  the  value  of  w2,  so  that  they  confirm 
the  results  stated,  but  not  rigorously  proved,  in  §  5.  The  numerical  calculations 
which  follow  will  make  the  matter  clearer. 

If  p  denotes  the  mean  density  of  the  rotating  mass,  the  total  mass  per  unit  length 
is  given  by 


Pr  dr  = 


4-7T 


+  AO 


AND   THE   NEBULAR    HYPOTHBBB. 

giving,  on  substitution  from  equation  (43), 


471 


whence,  for  the  ratio  of  p  to  o-,  we  have  the  general  formula 


a-  J0(*a)\       2wr/ 

For  the  particular  con%uration  which  occurs  at  a  point  of  bifurcation, 


<ta 


so  that 

whence  we  obtain 


In  the  following  table  I  have  calculated  the  values  of  u^/2ir<r  and  of  »»*/2irj5  for 
which  cylinders  of  different  radii  (a)  and  compressibility  (*)  first  become  elliptical  111 
cross  section : — 


V* 

1C* 

KOi. 

u..  . 

u... 

'/> 

'/, 

2™-' 

2rp' 

0 

o-oooo 

o-ooo 

0-500 

0-500 

0-1261 

0-063 

0-503 

0-600 

0-2582 

0-126 

0-510 

0-502 

0-4040 

0-192 

0-525 

0-506 

1 

0-5751 

0-261 

0-546 

0-511 

2 

2-575 

0-612 

0-762 

0-554 

2-4048 

00 

0-829 

1-000 

0-593 

3 

-1-304 

1-433 

2-099 

0-687 

3-8317 

o-ooo 

00 

00 

1-000 

It  will  be  seen  that  the  general  result  is  fully  confirmed,  that  incompressible 
masses  are  the  first  to  become  uustable,  and  that  the  more  compressible  the  mass  is, 
the  greater  is  the  rotation  required  for  it  to  depart  from  a  symmetrical  configuration. 

Rotating  nearly  Spherical  Mass  n-ith  High  Internal  Temperature. 

§  15.  We  now  leave  the  artificial  two-dimensional  problem  and  return  to  the  real 
problem  in  three  dimensions  discussed  in  §  13. 

The  coefficient  K  was  there  assumed  to  have  the  same  value  throughout  the  mass, 
as  of  course  it  would  if  the  matter  were  homogeneous  and  of  uniform  temperature 


472  MR.   J.    H.   JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

throughout.  But  to  represent  natural  astronomical  conditions  there  is  no  question 
that  K  ought  to  increase  on  passing  from  the  centre  to  the  surface,  thus  representing 
a  mass  in  which  the  temperature  is  highest  inside  and  falls  towards  the  surface. 

We  are  in  this  way  led  to  study  the  question  of  stability  when  K  is  a  function  of  r. 
It  would  be  difficult  to  say  precisely  what  function  ought  to  be  chosen  if  we  were 
trying  to  represent  natural  conditions  as  faithfully  as  possible.  It  appears,  however, 
that  no  continuous  function  will  lead  to  equations  which  admit  of  integration.  The 
only  case  which  appears  to  be  soluble  is  that  in  which  the  matter,  before  rotation, 
may  be  treated  as  if  formed  of  a  series  of  different  layers,  each  being  homogeneous 
and  at  a  uniform  temperature  in  itself,  but  the  temperature  varying  from  layer  to 
layer.  To  represent  this  we  take  different  values  of  K  in  the  different  layers,  K  being 
smallest  in  the  interior. 

There  is  no  limit  to  the  number  of  layers  which  can  be  treated  analytically,  but 
the  assumption  of  a  great  number  of  layers  naturally  leads  to  highly  complicated 
formulae  which  are  capable  of  conveying  their  meaning  only  after  laborious  numerical 
calculations.  Both  in  order  to  obtain  comprehensible  results  and  to  simplify  the 
argument,  the  layers  will,  in  what  follows,  be  supposed  to  be  only  two  in  number. 
They  may  conveniently  be  referred  to  as  the  core  and  the  crust.  It  will  be  found 
possible  to  generalize  the  results  obtained  so  as  to  apply  to  any  number  of  layers. 

§  16.  We  accordingly  suppose  that  there  is  an  interior  core  of  radius  a,  in  which 
the  coefficient  of  compressibility  has  the  uniform  value  K,  and  that  outside  this  is  the 
crust  of  external  radius  c,  in  which  the  coefficient  is  K.  It  is  again  necessary  to 
suppose  the  rotation  to  be  so  small  that  w2  may  be  neglected. 

As  in  §  3,  the  density  />  must  satisfy 

o     ...     ......     (47) 


throughout  the  core,  and  the  same  equation  with  the  appropriate  value  of  K  throughout 
the  crust.     The  most  general  solution  of  equation  (47)  is 


_l^(«r)}£  .....   (48) 

ZTT         o 

Iii  the  former  problem  all  the  terms  in  B71  could  be  omitted  because  p  had  to  be 
finite  at  the  origin.  In  discussing  the  solution  for  the  crust  these  terms  must  be 
retained.  The  solution  can,  however,  be  put  in  a  more  concise  form. 

Let  the  constants  An,  Bn  be  replaced  by  new  constants  Cn,  6n  given  by 

A,,  =  Cn  cos  6H,         Bn  =  C»  sin  dn, 
and  let  us  introduce  a  function  JB+i/a  (x,  9)  defined  by 

J»+v.(*.  0)  =  •*.+•/,(«)  cos  0  +  J_(n+1/2)(x)  sinB  ......     (49) 


AND   THE    NEBULAR    HYPOTHESIS.  473 

Then  the  solution  (48)  may  be  replaced  by 


(50) 


which  is  formally  analogous  to  (7). 

The  following  properties  of  the  function  J.+.,,(a-,  6)  may  readily  U<  verified,  an.l 
will  be  required  later  :  — 


. 

(52) 
(5:1) 


There  is  a  ready  rule  for  writing  down  the  values  of  these  functions.     In  the  first 
place,  we  have 

T    ,   ,        sinx  cos  x 

J  •/,.  W  =    /T  —  .        J  -v,  W  = 
V^TJ- 

so  that 

.       sin(.r  +  0) 

J,,,*,  0  =  - 

V  ^Tr./' 


Now  let  ^(.e  +  fl)  be  used  to  denote  a  general  function  made  up  of  circular  functioiiH 
of  x  +  6  and  of  algebraic  functions  of  x.  Then  J>/,(-r>  6)  is  of  the  form  <f>(j:  +  6),  and 
any  number  of  differentiations  with  respect  to  x,  or  of  multiplications  by  powers  of  x, 
will  still  leave  it  in  this  form.  It  follows  from  (52)  that  •!•/,(•'',  —  0),  Jv,(ar,  0),  Ac., 
will  l)e  of  this  form.  Hence  we  have  the  general  law 

<54) 


in  which  the  functional  form  of  $  is  at  once  given  by 

#(*)  =  •!.+'/,  (-4 

For  instance, 

/o         \  3 

J,,  (x)  =  Pj  -  1  )  sin  x-  -  cos  x, 

\3t  /  X 

so  that 

J.,,(ir,  0)  =  *(*  +  <>)  =  (^-l)sin(a-  +  0)-|co8(z+0).  | 


§  17.  We  proceed  to  carry  out  analysis  similar  U>  that  of  §  13.  Suppose  that  under 
a  tide-generating  potential  rnSn,  and  a  rotation  w,  the  core  assumes  a  configuration 
such  that  its  boundary  r  =  <t  becomes  deformed  into 

.     .     •     •  I55) 


VOL.  (10X111.  —  A, 


474  MR.   J.   H.   JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

while  the  cmter  surface  becomes 


XP,  ...........     (56) 

Let  us  suppose  the  densities  in  the  two  layers  to  be 


r-'''Ji,(,r)P.   .      .      .      (57) 

wT 

in  the  core,  and 

,»  =  ^C°r~l/Jjl^  .     .     (58) 

in  the  crust.  The  boundary  between  the  two  layers  must  clearly  be  an  equipotential, 
and  therefore  a  surface  of  constant  pressure  and  density.  .  Let  a-,  </  be  the  densities 
at  this  boundary  in  the  core  and  crust  respectively. 

On  replacing  r  by  a  +  frSB  +  /3P2  in  equations  (57)  and  (58),  the  values  of  p  must 
become  a-  and  or  respectively.     This  leads  to  the  relations 

*  ~  5  -  =  A0a-1/s  JVi  (Ka),      ..........     (59) 


(60) 
(61) 


h  (_  _       =  c    -.h.+.<fa..<,a.«-  (62) 

\         27T/  (cJ^(/ca,  —a) 

From  similar  analysis  applied  to  the  outer  boundary,  if  <r0  is  now  the  density  at 
this  Ixnmdary, 

<fi-il>j,l,(Ktc,*),.  .  .  .  •.-;.-'  :;:.  •.'  .  (63) 


- 


K  J3/.,  (KC,  —at.) 


(64) 


Similar  equations,  of  course,  connect  the  coefficients  which  depend  on  the  rotation. 
The  value  of  Vm  at  a  point  on  the  sphere  >•  =  c  can  now  be  written  down,  as  in 
11,  and  is  found  to  be 


V     =  4-7r 
'"    "  c 


~  7T  +  ^  {e1'' J.,,^,  -«)-a '^J3,(/«,  -a)} 


AND    THK    NEBULAR    HYPOTHESIS.  475 

in  which  the  rotational  terms  proportional  to  the  second  harmonic  are  omitted  and 

UB  is  given  by 


TT        C    r     *./  •  A 

U      =  — "   {('       ''  .1       i     IrV     ftl       n*  +  ll  T  /    '  O\"\          "•      »*•'    T  /        \ 

'      I  »+  /i  \*  *-')         M/  "»+•/,  \f  «,   ~F*){    T fl  J        11    (»'() 

• 

The  value  of  V  at  /•  =  r  is,  from  equation  ( l .;). 

,.         (67) 


whence,  evaluating  V-VW  and  picking  out  the  coefficient  of  8.,  we  find  as  the  value 

of  vn  at  r  =  c, 


As  before,  the  points  of  bifurcation,  if  any,  are  given  by  i\  =  0. 

§  18.  It  is  now  necessary  to  consider  the  boundary  conditions  which  must  be 
satisfied  at  the  junction  of  the  two  layers.  The  condition  of  continuity  of  material, 
•i.e.,  that  the  inner  surface  of  the  crust  shall  coincide  with  the  outer  surface  of  the 
core,  has  been  expressed  in  equation  (55),  b  and  ft  being  the  same  for  both  core  and 
crust.  There  is  an  equation  of  continuity  of  pressure  expressed  by 


13          a 
&   ~<rau 


(69) 


which  <rix)  is  now  used  to  represent  the  density  associated  with  zero  pressure. 
Finally,  there  is  a  condition  of  continuity  of  normal  force  and  this  requires  careful 
discussion. 

Let  M!  denote  the  mass  of  matter  actually  forming  the  core  and  let  V,  denote  it« 
potential  at  any  point  outside  the  core.  Let  M.,  denote  the  mass  which  would 
replace  the  core  if  the  solution  (58)  for  the  crust  were  extended  to  the  centre  and  let 
V2  denote  the  potential  of  this  mass  at  any  external  point.  It  will  Ixi  noticed  that  if 
solution  (58)  were  extended  to  the  origin,  it  would  give  an  infinite  density  p  at  the 
origin  and  also  an  infinite  value  of  V  in  virtue  of  equation  (o).  On  the  other  hand, 
it  is  readily  found,  by  direct  integration,  that  V,  the  potential  of  the  mass  M,,  in 
finite  at  every  point,  including  the  origin.  It  follows  that  V  can  only  be  the 
potential  of  this  imaginary  arrangement  of  matter  when  it  is  acted  on  by  certain 
external  forces  of  which  the  potential  becomes  infinite  at  the  origin.  Let  V,  represent 
the  potential  of  these  forces.  The  value  of  V,  is  readily  found,  for  it  must  satisfy 

VaV,  =  0  and  must  coincide  with  V  or  with  -^  to  within  an  additive  constant  at 

K 

the  origin.     Thus  V3  is  the  limit  of  the  right-hand  side  of  equation  (67)  when  r  =  0, 

3  P  "2 


476  MR.   J.   H.   JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILIT 

/•  replacing  c.     This  is  found  to  be 

v        4«TC0(frr)'/'an« 
s~    '2 


r 

The  condition  now  to  he  satisfied  is  clearly  that 


at  all  points  on  the  boundary  r  =  a  +  6Sn.  This  requires  that  Vl— V2  — V3  shall  vanish, 
to  within  a  constant,  at  all  points  outside  this  boundary,  and  therefore,  in  particular, 
at  r  =  c.  It  will  be  readily  seen  that 

V  —V   —  V  —  (V  } 

v  1         »  3   -       vm       V  '  m/n  =  0 

while  V3  is  exactly  the  value  of  the  terms  in  Vm  that  involve  a,  when  a  is  put  equal 
to  zero.  The  conditions  sought  are,  therefore,  simply  that  all  the  terms  in  a  which 
occur  in  Vm  shall  vanish  at  every  point  of  the  sphere. 

§  19.  We  may  now  equate  the  coefficients  of  the  separate  harmonics,  and  obtain 

On  T    I  i  \  Afl  T    /     \  ^7fA 

fr-£U    •     •     (71) 


On  account  of  the  simplifications  made  possible  by  these  eqxiations,  equation  (68) 
may  be  put  in  the  form 


<-„  =       ac-'^v,  (KC>  /3)- 

n  >  .....     (72) 


The  elimination  of  AO  and  C0  from  (59),  (60),  and  (70)  gives 

-  ^\  Js/2  (K'a'  -ct)  -  /„  _  «^ 
" 


K'  Jv7(?aT  a)  "  2W  IT  Jv,  (*a)  ' 

while  similarly  the  elimination  of  An  and  Cn  from  (61),  (62),  and  (71)  gives 

i  4.  J,,^/.,(^«,  -$)3*,.(K'a,  -a)\  __  i     _  uf\  L      J,+./.  (K«)  J./,  (*»)! 
J.+Vi  (K'a,  ft)  J,,  (,'a,  a)    I  '  2W  I       J.+.fc  M  J-/3  M/  ' 

For  brevity  we  introduce  a  function  un(x,  9),  a  generalisation  of  the  un  of  §  11,  the 


AND   THE    NEBULAR    HYPOTHESIS. 

new  function  being  defined  by 

H.(X,0)=   -Alog{x-'^J..lJX,0)}   =  J^i^l.  , 

J.-'/.u,  fl) 
Equations  (73)  and  (74)  now  become 

<r'~2~  ff~~ 

K 

1  \         /       n+l\*^*/!«          •         \'*/ 

while  (72)  becomes 


so  that  points  of  bifurcation  are  given  by 

Ul(A-,a).     .     '.     .....     (78) 


Again,  if  the  rotation  may  be  treated  as  small,  there  will  invariably  be  a  change  of 
stability  at  these  points  of  bifurcation,  since  vjCn  changes  sign  on  passing  through 
one  of  them. 

§  20.  It  is  at  once  clear  that  the  method  can  be  extended  to  a  mass  consisting  of 
any  number  of  layers  —  the  only  difficulty  occurs  in  the  numerical  computations  at 
the  end.  At  each  boundary  between  two  consecutive  layers  there  will  be  equations 
of  continuity  precisely  similar  to  (75)  and  (76),  while  the  final  value  of  »'.  will  be 
given  by  an  equation  exactly  similar  to  (77),  which  it  will  be  seen  involves  only 
quantities  associated  with  the  outer  boundary. 

The  procedure  in  any  particular  case  will  be  to  start,  so  to  speak,  with  the 
innermost  core  of  the  system.  Equation  (75)  is  linear  in  cos  a  and  sin  a,  so  that 
tan  a  is  uniquely  determined.  Leaving  out  of  account  systems  in  which  the  densitv 
is,  in  any  part,  negative,  this  will  be  found  to  l>e  adequate  to  determine  a  uniquely. 
Equation  (76)  now  becomes  a  linear  equation  in  cos  ft  and  sin  ft,  from  which  ft  can  l»e 
determined  uniquely.  Tn  this  way.  passing  from  layer  to  layer,  we  can  determine 
the  various  values  of  a,  ft  for  the  different  layers.  Finally,  the  a's  and  ft'n  la-ing 
known,  equation  (78)  can  be  regarded  either  as  an  equation  for  w*  or  as  an  equation 
for  c,  i.e.,  it  can  be  regarded  either  as  determining  the  highest  rotation  for  which 
the  symmetrical  configuration  is  stable  for  a  given  value  of  »•,  or  as  determining  the 
largest  value  of  c  for  which  the  mass  is  stable  under  a  given  rotation.  If  the  value  of 

-^—  obtained  by  the  first  method  is  not  small,  the  result  will  be  inaccurate  ;  if  the 
2*xr( 

value  for  <•  obtained  by  the  second  method  is  so  great  that  the  density  is  in  places 


478  MR.   J.   H.   JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

negative,  the  result  will  be  of  no  interest  except  as  proving  stability  for  smaller 
values  of  c. 

§  21.  It  may  be  well  to  take  a  general  survey  of  the  equations  before  giving  special 
calculations.  For  simplicity  we  again  consider  two  layers  only,  core  and  crust.  From 
(75)  and  (76)  it  is  clear  that,  when  a  =  0  or  K  =  K  (involving  a-  =  </),  the  values  of  « 
and  ft  vanish.  Broadly  speaking,  the  more  distinct  the  core  is  from  the  crust,  tl it- 
larger  a  and  ft  are.  Equation  (78),  of  course,  differs  only  from  the  corresponding 
equation  previously  found,  by  the  presence  of  the  terms  a.  and  ft.  The  effect  of  these 
terms  is  seen  ou  noticing  that,  in  the  notation  already  used,  «,  (K'C,  a.)  is  of  the  form 
<f>  (K'C— a).  Thus,  to  allow  for  the  effect  of  the  core  on  the  term  M,  (K'C,  a),  we  have  to 
leave  the  algebraic  part  of  the  function  unaltered,  but  to  change  all  the  trigono- 
metrical arguments  from  K'C  to  K'C— a.  Speaking  very  broadly,  the  general  effect  on 
the  graph  of  «,  (cf.  fig.  l)  is  a  compromise  between  leaving  the  graph  unaltered  and 
moving  it  bodily  a  distance  a.  along  the  axis.  Similar  statements  apply  to  the  graph 
of  »„.  Thus,  while  rotation  as  before  is  represented  by  flattening  the  graph  of  ut  in 
fig.  1,  the  presence  of  a  core  is  represented  by  a  distortion  of  the  graphs  which  may, 
with  some  truth,  be  thought  of  as  bodily  movements  parallel  to  the  axis.  These 
bodily  movements  may  cause  new  intersections  between  the  graph  ut  and  the  other 
graphs,  and  the  points  of  intersection  will  represent  points  of  bifurcation  at  which 
the  symmetrical  configuration  will  become  unstable. 

No  Rotation. 

§  22.  The  case  that  may  properly  be  inspected  first  is  that  of  no  rotation.  The 
equations  reduce  to 

^ul(K'a,a)  =  ^ul(Ka),.     .....          .     .     (79) 


,  (K'a,  oL)um+,(K'a,  ft)}  =0-  {!+«,  (**)«,,+,(<**)},      .     .     .     (80) 
and,  the  equation  for  points  of  bifurcation, 

un(K'c,  -ft)  =  Ul(K'c,a)  .....  •    .     .     .  .     (81) 

When  n  =  1,  it  is  seen  that  ft  =  —a.  is  a  solution  of  (80),  and  must  therefore  (§  20) 
be  the  only  solution.  To  verify  that  ft  =  —a  is  a  solution,  replace  ft  by  —a  in  (80) 
and  it  becomes 

.     .     .     ....     .     (82) 


which  is  seen  to  be  identical  with  (79)  (cf.  equations  (53)  and  (74«)).  Equation  (81) 
now  reduces  to  an  identity,  so  that  every  configuration  is  formally  a  point  of 
bifurcation.  The  interpretation  is,  of  course,  the  same  as  that  of  §  11,  the  displace- 
ment for  which  n  =  1  is  a  rigid  body  displacement,  and  so  requires  no  force  to 


AND   THE   NEBULAR    HYPOTHESIS 


maintain  it.  There  is,  of  course,  nothing  of  the  nature  of  a  change  of  stability,  for 
?<„/(}„,  instead  of  changing  sign,  remains  permanently  zero.  The  consideration  of 
n  =  1  is  of  no  value  except  that  it  provides  a  check  on  the  result  of  a  rather  involved 
series  of  analytical  processes. 

When  there  is  homogeneity  hetween  core  and  crust  the  non-rotating  system  has 
l>een  found  to  he  stable  for  all  displacements.  To  examine  whether  this  is  altered  by 
the  presence  of  the  crust,  it  is  natural  to  test  first  the  extreme  case  in  which  (In- 
difference between  the  core  and  crust  is  as  great  as  possible.  Let  us  make  th«-  core 
so  hot  that  its  density  is  zero,  so  that  *  has  to  be  zero  in  order  that  the  internal 
pressure  may  be  maintained  (cf.  equation  (12)). 

Putting  a-  —  0,  equations  (79)  and  (80)  reduce  to 


=  0. 


or,  by  equation  (74a), 

J.fc(*'«,  -a)  =  0,         J.+.fc(«'o,  ft)  =  0 
whence  (equation  (49))  a,  /3  are  given  by 

=  ;         tan  ft  =  - 


(83) 
(84) 

(85) 


The  values  of  a,  /3  corresponding  to  a  few  values  of  *a  are  given  below— 


KCI. 


ft- 


n  =  2. 


- 

1      •  ' 
0             0 

•     > 

0 

1             12  1« 

-   0  59 

2             51  9 

15  7 

3            100  20 

-  48  12 

4 

153  13 

-  91  54 

5 

-  207  48 

-  140  45 

6 

263  12 

192  21 

7 

319  8 

-245  33 

9 

432  0 

-354  51 

12 

602  21 

-521  54 

n  =  3. 


0 

0      2 

•2  21 

16  39 

46  •_>•.' 

S6  9 


The  case  which  is  most  favourable  to  the  occurrence  of  points  of  bifurcation  with 
positive  values  of  P  is  when  <ru  falls  to  zero  at  the  outer  boundary.  Let  us  accordingly 
examine  this  case.  We  have  (equation  (63)) 

J1/3(/c,a)  =  0 (86) 

so  that  . 


KC  =  r-a. 


480  MR.   .1.    H.   JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

And  in  virtue  of  (86),  the  equation  giving  points  of  bifurcation  (going  back  to 
equation  (72))  is 

.    ^TTC  '  On  y        /  /          n\  IQQ\ 

"2n+l   *'     "    ''l 

so  that  points  of  bifurcation  of  order  w  are  given  by 

J._Vf  (ir-a,  -^8)  =  0 (89) 

When  n  =  2,  this  becomes 


tan  (TT  —  0.  +  /3)  =  TT  —  OL  ; 

when  n  =  3,  it  is 

3  (TT  —  a 


%  /  „•> 

tan  (,-«_#  = 

On  treating  these  equations  numerically  it  is  found  that  they  can  never  be  satisfied 
We  conclude  that  the  non-rotating  mass  is  stable  for  all  displacements,  subject,  of 
course,  to  the  condition  that  the  density  shall  be  everywhere  positive. 

Slow  Rotation. 
§  23.  We    consider   next    the    stability   of  a   rotating   mass    of    the    type    under 

2 

consideration,  in  which  we  are  limited  to  -  -  being  small  compared  with  the  density  of 

^7T 

the  main  mass.    If  we  suppose  that  a-,  the  density  of  the  core  at  its  outer  boundary,  is 

a 

equal  to  —  ,  we  shall  have  a  case  —  somewhat  artificial  of  course—  in  which  the  density 

2?r 

of  the  core  is  very  small  compared  with  that  of  the  crust,  and  in  which  the  equations 
are  not  too  complex  to  admit  of  treatment. 

o 

We  accordingly  assume  that  a-  =  —  ,  and  the  equations  (75),  (76),  and  (77)  (or  (72)) 

2?r 

reduce  to  the  same  equations  as  in  the  case  of  no  rotation  (equations  (83)).  Thus  a,  ft 
have  the  same  values  as  before,  being  given  by  the  table  on  p.  479. 

If  we  suppose  that  at  the  outer  boundary  of  the  crust  the  density  falls  to  the  small 

o 

value  <r0  =  —  ,  then  the  value  of  c,  the  radius  of  the  outer  boundary,  is,  as  before,  given 

2tTT 

by  equations  (86)  or  (87),  and  the  value  of  vn  is  still  given  by  equation  (88).  Thus  the 
analysis  is  exactly  the  same  as  in  the  case  of  no  rotation,  and  there  are  no  points  of 
bifurcation. 

It  follows  that,  when  <r0  does  not  have  this  special  value  assigned  to  it,  the  only 
hope  of  finding  points  of  bifurcation  rests  upon  the  gravitational  tendency  to  instability 
which  arises  from  the  presence  of  the  small  layer  of  crust  in  which  p  has  a  value  less 

o 

than  —  .     Let  us  pass  at  once  to  the  examination  of  the  extreme  case  in  which  o-g  =  0, 

iTT 


AND   THE    NEBULAR    HYPOTHESIS.  ig 

Denoting  as  before  the  density  of  the  crust  at  its  inner  surface  (r  =  a)  by  </,  aud 
putting  <TO,  the  density  at  the  outer  surface  (r  =  c)  equal  to  zero,  we  have 

P  «-'/»   T     /  >„      \          i     W1 
\j0a      Ji/f  (K  a,  a)  =  <r , 


whence,  on  elimination  of  C0, 


Equation  (72)  still  gives 


-''.  J, 


_  j  _  c  sin 


a  sin  (*'« 
J..V,  (*V,  -ft)  =  0, 


(90) 


as  the  condition  for  points  of  bifurcation,  and  when  n  =  2  (the  only  case  which 
appears  to  be  worth  examining),  this  reduces  to 


tan  (<c'e+/8)  =  K'C, 


(91) 


in  which  /3  is  given  from  the  table  on  p.  479.  The  procedure  is  to  find  /<•  from  equation 
(91),  and  hence  calculate  the  value  of  utfeiro-'  from  equation  (90).  The  results  for  a 
few  values  of  K'a  are  given  in  the  table  following  (the  last  column  is  explained 
later) :— 


t 

/ca. 

K'C. 

c/a. 

tr*/2™-'. 

W*/2»0. 

0 

C                   1 

4-489  =  257  27 

00 

00 

0-40 

1 

4-475  =  256  54 

4-475 

0-2221 

0-45 

2 

4-713  =  269  21 

2-356 

0-2269 

0-60 

3 

5-380  =  308  16 

1-793 

0-2159 

0-52 

4 

6-153  =  352  37 

1-538                        0-l*i:i 

0-51 

5 

7-026  =  402  40 

1-405 

0-1570 

0-50 

6 

7-944  =  455     7 

1-324 

0-1365 

0-49 

7 

8-886  =  509     9 

1-269 

0-1198 

0-48 

The  obvious  remark  must  at  once  be  made  that  prol>ably  all  the  values  for 
are  too  large  for  results  obtained  by  the  neglect  of  w*  to  be  accurate.  But  apart  from 
absolute  accuracy  there  is  an  obvious  tendency  for  the  value  of  K^/STO-'  to  fall  off  as  *'u 
increases — for  lower  values  of  c/a  the  symmetrical  configuration  becomes  unstable  (•  >r 
lower  and  lower  values  of  w"/2»w'.  For /a  =  100,  the  value  of  w*/2T<r'  is  0'0104. 

§24.  Against  this,  it  must  be  noticed  that  the  value  of  w'/'2ir<rf  is  of  very  slight 
importance ;  what  we  are  concerned  with  is  the  ratio  of  w'/'Z-ir  to  the  mean  density  of 
the  whole  mass.  For  a  very  rough  calculation,  we  may  assume  the  mean  density  of 

VOL.  ccxni. — A.  3  Q 


482  MR.  J-   H.  JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 


the  crust  to  be  £</,  whence  it  follows  that  the  mean  density  of  the  whole  mass  will  be 
roughly  equal  to  a  density  0  defined  by 


and  the  value  of  w^flirQ  will  be  approximately  the  same  as  the  quantity  w2f'2irp  which  is 
computed  from  observations  of  binary  stars.  Values  of  w2/2v8  are  given  in  the  last 
column  of  the  table  on  the  preceding  page  ;  the  value  0'40  corresponding  to  tc'a  =  0 
(no  core)  being  inserted  from  the  result  of  the  previous  analysis  (§  13).  As  before, 
the  numbers  are  not  numerically  accurate,  but  their  general  trend  may  be  expected  to 
reveal  the  general  trend  of  the  true  series  of  numbers.  It  at  once  appears  that  the 
values  of  w^fe-rd  are  surprisingly  steady  :  there  is  certainly  no  rapid  decrease  in  their 
amount  as  //«  increases. 

Summary  and  Conclusion. 

§25.  The  problem  we  have  had  under  consideration  has  been  that  of  testing  whether 
the  behaviour  of  a  rotating  mass  of  compressible  heterogeneous  matter  differs  very 
widely  from  that  of  the  incompressible  homogeneous  mass  which  has  been  studied  by 
MACLAUEIN,  JACOBI,  POINCARE,  and  DARWIN.  The  result  obtained  can  be  summed 
up  very  briefly  by  saying  that  the  ideal  incompressible  mass  has  been  found  to  supply 
a  surprisingly  good  model  by  which  to  study  the  behaviour  of  the  more  complicated 
systems  found  in  astronomy.  The  problem  especially  under  consideration  has  been 
that  of  determining  the  amount  of  rotation  at  which  configurations  of  revolution 
(e.g.,  spheroids)  first  become  unstable.  In  so  far  as  we  have  been  able  to  examine  the 
question,  it  appears  probable  that  the  compressible  mass  will  behave,  at  least  up  to  this 
point,  in  a  manner  almost  exactly  similar  to  the  simpler  incompressible  mass,  and 
results  obtained  for  the  latter  will  be  nearly  true,  both  qualitatively  and  quantitatively, 
for  the  former.  The  compressible  mass,  set  into  rotation,  will  apparently  pass  through 
a  series  of  flattened  configurations  very  similar  to  the  Maclaurin  spheroids  ;  it  will 
then,  for  just  about  the  same  amount  of  rotation  (as  measured  by  w2jp),  leave  the 
symmetrical  form  and  assume  a  form  similar  to  the  Jacobian  ellipsoids.  Beyond  this 
stage  our  analysis  has  not  been  able  to  deal  with  the  problem.  Indeed,  strictly 
speaking,  our  analysis  has  hardly  been  able  to  carry  this  far.  A  question  of 
importance  has  been  whether  the  quasi-spheroidal  form  for  a  compressible  mass  does 
not  become  unstable  for  a  much  smaller  value  of  iv*  than  the  incompressible  mass,  and 
whether  the  instability  does  not  set  in  in  a  different  way.  These  questions  we  have 
been  able  to  answer,  with,  I  think,  a  very  high  degree  of  probability,  in  the  negative. 
The  whole  matter  is  of  necessity  one  of  probability  only,  and  not  of  certainty,  for  the 
general  heterogeneous  compressible  mass  is  not  amenable  to  analysis  until  a  great 
number  of  simplifying  assumptions  have  been  made. 

It  was  first  pointed  out  that  a  compressible  mass  has  an  infinitely  greater  number 


AND   THE    NEBULAK    HYPOTHESIS.  483 

of  vibrations  than  an  incompressible  one,  and  as  the  mass  is  only  stable  when  every 
vibration  individually  is  stable,  it  might  be  thought  that  a  compressible  mass  had  more 
chance  of  being  unstable — or  would  become  unstable  sooner — than  the  corresponding 
compressible  mass.  This  has  on  the  whole  been  found  not  to  be  the  case,  and  ->n 
looking  through  the  analysis  the  reason  can  be  seen. 

A  vibration  in  a  compressible  mass  may  be  regarded  loosely  as  a  system  of  waves  ; 
the  distance  from  one  point  of  zero  displacement  to  the  next  may  be  regarded  as  a  sort 
of  wave-length  of  the  vibration.  The  stability  or  instability  of  a  vibration  depends  on 
which  is  the  greater — the  gain  in  elastic  energy  or  the  loss  in  gravitational  energy 
when  the  vibration  takes  place.  But  as  between  a  vibration  of  great  wave-length  and 
one  of  short  wave-length  there  is  this  important  distinction  :  for  equal  maximum 
amplitudes  the  gravitational  disturbance  caused  by  the  disturbance  of  great  wave- 
length is  much  greater  than  that  caused  by  the  disturbance  of  short  wave-length,  since 
the  elements  of  the  latter  very  largely  neutralise  one  another.  Thus  the  change  in 
gravitational  energy  is  enormously  the  greatest  for  disturbances  of  great  wave-length, 
while  it  is  easily  seen  that  the  changes  in  elastic  energy  are  approximately  the  same. 
It  follows  that  if  the  mass  becomes  unstable  it  will  be  through  a  vibration  of  tin- 
greatest  possible  wave-length,  i.e.,  a  wave-length  about  equal  to  the  diameter  of  the 
mass.  This  general  prediction  is  amply  verified  in  the  detailed  problems  that  have 
been  discussed.  When  we  reflect  that  the  vibrations  of  greatest  wave-length  are 
exactly  those  which  are  common  both  to  compressible  and  incompressible  masses,  we 
see  readily  that,  in  this  respect  at  least,  compressibility  is  likely  to  make  but  little 
difference. 

The  vibrations  of  greatest  wave-length  are  put  in  evidence,  both  in  the  compressible 
and  incompressible  mass,  by  the  displacement  of  the  surface.  A  vibration  in  which 
the  displacement  is  proportional  to  a  zonal  harmonic  P,  may  be  thought  of  as  having 
a  wave-length  approximately  equal  to  -a-a/ii.  In  accordance  with  the  principle  that 
vibrations  of  great  wave-lengths  are  most  effective  towards  instability,  we  should 
expect  the  lowest  values  of  n  to  give  the  vibrations  which  first  bacome  unstable,  and 
this  is,  in  fact,  found  to  be  the  case.  But  here  a  very  real  distinction  enters  between 
the  compressible  and  the  incompressible  mass.  In  the  incompressible  mass  vibrations 
of  order  n  =  1  are  non-existent,  the  displacement  being  purely  a  rigid  tx»dy  displace- 
ment ;  in  the  compressible  mass  vibrations  of  order  »  =  1  can  certainly  occur,  and  so 
might  reasonably  be  expected  to  be  the  first  to  become  unstable. 

It  is  in  point  of  fact  known  that  the  incompressible  mass  becomes  unstable  through 
vibrations  of  orders  2,  3,  ...  in  turn;    it  is  found  that  the  compressible  mass  also 
becomes  unstable  through   vibrations  of  orders  2,  3,  ...  in  turn,  the  vibrations  of 
order   1   failing   completely  to  produce   instability.     The  reason   for  this  apparent 
anomaly  can,  I  think,  be  traced  in  the  following  way.     In  a  displacement  of  order  1 
any  spherical  layer  of  particles  will  after  displacement  be  spread  uniformly  . 
another  sphere  excentric  to  the  first.     The   gravitational   force   produced 

3  Q  2 


484  MR.  J.   H.   JEANS    ON    GRAVITATIONAL    INSTABILITY 

sphere  of  particles  both  before  and  after  displacement  is  exactly  nil  at  a  point  inside 
the  sphere.  Thus  the  gravitational  field  set  up  by  a  displacement  of  order  1 
neutralises  itself  in  a  way  not  contemplated  in  the  general  argument  outlined  above. 
Also  the  vibrations  of  order  1  and  of  greatest  wave-length  in  the  interior  are  not 
available,  for  they  represent  solely  a  rigid  body  displacement. 

The  question  of  vibrations  of  order  1  is  treated  in  §§  3-7  ;  it  is  shown  that  they 
may  be  disregarded,  and  we  pass  to  the  consideration  of  vibrations  of  orders  2,  3,  ..., 
expecting  (as,  in  fact,  is  found  to  be  the  case)  that  instability  will  first  set  in  through 
a  vibration  of  order  2. 

It  is  only  possible  to  discuss  special  cases,  and  the  one  which  is  most  amenable  to 
analysis  is  that  in  which  the  pressure  and  density  are  connected  by  LAPLACE'S  law, 
p  =  c(p*— <r2).  It  is  first  proved  (§§  8-11)  that,  for  a  mass  of  such  matter  at  rest, 
the  spherical  form  is  stable  for  all  displacements.  Later  (§§  15-22)  it  is  shown  that 
this  is  true  when  c  varies  inside  the  mass ;  it  is  true  even  up  to  the  case  which  is  the 
most  likely  to  be  unstable,  in  which  the  matter  in  the  interior  is  of  negligible  density 
and  the  main  part  of  the  mass  is  collected  in  a  surface  crust — a  sort  of  astronomical 
soap-bubble. 

We  proceed  next  to  examine  for  what  amount  of  rotation  these  figures  will  become 
unstable,  treating  first  the  case  in  which  c  is  the  same  throughout  the  mass. 
Imagining  c  and  a-  to  vary  we  can  get  a  variety  of  types  of  mass.  The  surprising 
result  is  obtained  (by  something  short  of  strict  mathematical  proof)  that  the  figure 
which  is  the  first  to  become  unstable  (as  w2/2?rP  increases  uniformly  for  them  all)  is 
the  perfectly  incompressible  one — gravitational  instability  appears  to  act  in  the 
unexpected  direction,  at  any  rate  when  the  degree  of  rotation  is  measured  by  iv^feirp, 
p  being  the  mean  density.  As  it  was  not  possible  to  obtain  strictly  accurate  figures 
in  this  case,  the  result  was  checked  by  considering  the  artificial,  but  physically 
analogous,  problem  of  rotating  cylinders  of  Laplacian  matter,  in  which  it  was  possible 
to  obtain  perfectly  exact  results  (§14).  The  result  was  confirmed,  and  the  additional 
information  was  obtained  that  the  value  of  w*/2-7rp  remains  surprisingly  steady 
through  quite  a  wide  range  of  compressibility  (vide  table  on  p.  471). 

The  physical  reason  for  this  can,  I  think,  be  understood  as  follows.  The  more 
compressible  the  matter  is  the  more  it  tends  to  concentrate  near  the  centre,  i.e.,  in 
just  those  regions  where  the  "  centrifugal  force  "  obtains,  so  to  speak,  least  grip  on  it. 
Incompressibility  neutralises  the  gravitational  tendency  to  instability,  but  tends  to 
compel  the  matter  to  place  itself  so  that  the  rotational  tendency  to  instability  can 
act  at  the  best  advantage. 

The  similar  problem  is  next  investigated  (§§  23,  24)  when  c  varies  inside  the  mass  ; 
in  particular,  the  limiting  case  of  a  soap-bubble-like  mass  is  considered.  Again  the 
surprising  result  emerges  that  the  value  of  nffe-wp  needed  to  establish  instability  of 
the  symmetrical  configuration  is  just  about  the  same  as  before  (vide  table,  p.  481). 
The  matter  is  now  constrained  to  remain,  so  to  speak,  on  the  rim  of  a  fly-wheel  where 


AND   THE   NEBULAR    HYPOTHESIS.  485 

the  centrifugal  force  can  act  at  the  best  advantage  and  gravitational  instability  has 
full  scope.  If  p  is  the  mean  density  of  the  crust,  w*/2irp  must  obviously  be  le»»  than 
before.  But  if  p  is  the  mean  density  of  the  whole  mass,  p/p  is  also  much  smaller. 
These  two  quantities  march  with  approximately  equal  steps,  so  that  i<*l'2*]t  remains 
almost  unaltered. 

Thus  we  have  the  general  result  that  for  all  the  varied  types  of  mass  that  have 
been  considered  the  spheroidal  or  quasi-spheroidal  form  always  becomes  first  unstalil.- 
for  just  about  the  same  value  of  t^/2irp.  If,  from  the  point  of  view  of  discover!  ng 
new  processes  in  nature,  the  present  investigation  has  been  somewhat  l>arren,  at  least 
we  may  reflect  that  the  work  of  DAKWIN  and  POINCAR£  has  been  shown,  to  some 
extent,  to  have  an  enhanced  value,  in  that  it  seems  to  apply  to  the  real  bodies  of 
nature  and  not  merely  to  mathematical  abstractions. 


[     487     ] 


INDEX 


TO  THI 


PHILOSOPHICAL    TRANSACTIONS 


SERIES  A,  VOL.  213. 


c. 

Carbonic  acid  at  low  temperature*,  thermal  properties  of  (JssitiN  and  Pn),  67. 
Cassegrain  reflector  with  corrected  field  (SAMPSON),  27. 

CHAPMAN  (S.  C.).     On  the  Diurnal  Variations  of  the  Earth's  Magnetism  produced  by  the  Moon  and  Sun,  279. 
CHRBB  (C.).     Some  Phenomena  of  Sunspote  and  of  Terrestrial  Magnetism.— Part  II.,  246. 

CUTUBBBTSON  (C.  and  M.).    On  the  Refraction  and  Dispersion  of  the  Halogens,  Ilalogen  Acids,  Oione,  Steam,  Oiidt*  of 
Nitrogen  und  Ammonia,  1. 

O. 

Gravitational  instability  and  nebular  hypothesis  (jBANs),  457. 

GRIFFITHS  (E.  H.  and  £.).     The  Capacity  for  Ilent  of  Metals  at  Different  Temperatures,  being  an  Account  of  KiperimenU 
performed  in  the  Research  Laboratory  of  the  University  College  of  South  Wales  and  Monmouthshire,  119. 


II. 

Heat,  capacity  for,  of  metals  at  different  temperatures  (GRIFFITHS),  119. 

HICKS  (W.  M.).     A  Critical   Study  of  Spectral   Series.— Part  III.   The  Atomic   Weight  Term  and   iU    Import  in  tlw 

Constitution  of  Spectra,  323. 
HOPKINSON  ( 1!.).     A  Method  of  Measuring  the  Pressure  produced  in  the  Detonation  of  lligh  Kxplo*ives  or  by  the  Impact 

of  Bullets,  437. 

J. 

JEANS  (J.  H.).     Gravitational  Instability  and  the  Nebular  Hypothesis,  467. 

JKNKIN  (C.  F.)  and  PTB  (D.  R.).     The  Thermal  Properties  of  Carbonic  Acid  at  Low  Temperature*,  67. 


LY.LB  (T.  R.).     On  the  Self-inductance  of  Circular  Coils  of  Rectangular  Section,  421. 

VCL.   CCXIII. A  508.  3    R  Published  separately,  February  6,  1914. 


488  INDEX. 


M. 

Magnetism,  diurnal  variations  of  earth's,  produced  by  moon  and  sun  (CHAPMAN),  279. 
Magnetism,  terrestrial,  and  sunspots,  some  phenomena  of  (CHBKE),  245. 
Metals,  capacity  for  heat  of,  at  different  temperatures  (&BIFFITHS),  119. 


N. 
Nebular  hypothesis  and  gravitational  instability  (JEANS),  457. 


P. 

Pressure  produced  in  detonation  of  explosives  or  by  impact  of  bullets,  method  of  measuring  (IIopKiNSON),  437. 
PYE  (D.  R.).    See  JENKIN  and  PIE. 


R. 

Refraction  and  dispersion  of  halogens,  halogen  acids,  ozone,  &c.  (CCTHBEBTSON),  1. 


S. 

SAMPSON  (R.  A.).     On  a  Cassegrain  Reflector  with  Corrected  Field,  27. 
Self-inductance  of  circular  coils  of  rectangular  section  (LYLE),  421. 
SOUTHWELL  (R.  V.).    On  the  General  Theory  of  Elastic  Stability,  187. 
Spectra,  constitution  of,  and  the  atomic  weight  term  (HiCKs),  323. 
Stability,  general  theory  of  elastic  (SOUTHWELL),  187. 
Sunspots  and  terrestrial  magnetism,  some  phenomena  of  (CHBEE),  245. 


HABBI80X   AlfD   SOUS,   PBIKTBBS   IN    ORDINAEY   TO   HIS   MAJESTY,  ST.   MABTIN's   LANE,   LONDON,   W.C. 


W  Roya^  .  of  London 

41  Philosophical  tr*nB»etiona. 

L62  Ser  nautical  and 

v.213  ph  ijs. 


Se.. 


Seh.k 


PLEASE  DO  NOT  REMOVE 
CARDS  OR  SLIPS  FROM  THIS  POCKET 

UNIVERSITY  OF  TORONTO  LIBRARY