■CNJ
ico
UNIVERSITY O
II 1 111
761 01
^HH
— =
1
CO
b
POISON MYSTERIES
IN
HISTORY, ROMANCE AND CRIME
^^^^jL^^uPBBpH^^Hp[HH^^H9B||^^^<
i^H^R^^ .>s^»^-
^^^^'l 'l^^'^^^Ui
HM^^^KJ n/.. J^K^' ^^^. w^\ "TTWWTr^^
Kipp p^^iii . : *'^^^^S^^M.,^^HHKSl ■^^^^H^H^^P'-
^^f liS .^ z^-;^^^^^^^^^^ WMm.
■ ; , ^, ^ ... ^ • -r -^^ -;^^_^'^^ ^:* Jjftiffl^^
Jf ^^ '' ^^ fF^w^p^^^^Wr "^■
^LJ^^ ^^i ^ ■ ^^^~'m9^ -^* ^
g ,.^^^ W^ - Ai^^^^^^ itt^«- ^ ^ ^ 0"1
^^-"^^^^Hi ' '
' " ^^^^ti^
IPi
^1 /
A:U %^€^^l
^
Wl'.l; /
1 T^P^ -^ ^^»y .
%jj '-'■ , ;;,--^it
<»» *■- , *';-'// '■^■"
^^^^
I^^^W
iH/^
.rSia
,^^^.^^flK>-" :,:^;
NATIVES OF THE FRENCH SUDAN, SOUTH OF THE NIGER, PREPARING
THEIR ARROW POISON AND DIPPING THEIR WEAPONS.
(From a drawing by A. Forestier.)
Reproduced by kind permission of the proprietors of the Illustrated London News.
[Frontispiece.
HSON MYSTERIES
IN
HISTORY, ROMANCE
AND CRIME
\t^ ^ J: BY
C.'j? si" THOMPSON, M.B.E.
Author of "The History and Romance of Alchemy
and Pharmacy," etc., etc.
LONDON :
THE SCIENTIFIC PRESS, LTD.
28 & 29 SOUTHAMPTON STREET
STRAND, W.C.2.
1923
TO
SIR WILLIAM H. WILLCOX,
K.C.I.E., C.B., C.M.G., M.D., F.R.C.P. Lond.
As a slight appreciation of the eminent
services he has rendered to
Toxicology and
Medicine.
CONTENTS
Part I
POISONS IN HISTORY AND ROMANCE
CHAP. PAGE
I Poisons used by Ancient and Primitive Races 15
Poisoned Weapons — Poisons employed by Primitive
Peoples — Malay, African and Indian native Poisons
— The Upas Poison— Ordeal Poisons.
II Poisons used by the Egyptians, Greeks,
Romans, Hebrews, Chinese, Persians, and
Hindus in Ancient Times ... 26
A Babylonian Poison Goddess — Poisons in Mytho-
logy— Poisons in Ancient Egypt — The State Poison
of the Greeks — The Death of Socrates.
III Antidotes to Poison in Ancient Times . 40
Poison Laws in Ancient Times — Antidotes and Alexi-
pharmica — Theriaca and its History.
IV Preventive Methods and Substances used
AGAINST Poisons ..... 49
Terra Sigillata — How it was Tested — Toad Stones
— Unicorn's Horn — Rhinoceros Horn and Assay
Cups — Bezoar Stones.
V Superstitions connected with Poisonous
Plants . . . . . . . 63
Mandrake — Aconite — Hellebore — Opium —
Henbane.
VT The Poison Lore of Toads and Spiders . 84
Poison extracted from the Toad — How an Italian
Doctor proved his knowledge of Medicine — A
Mysterious Chinese Poison prepared from Toads —
Venomous Spiders — A.Romany Poison.
VII Some Classical Poisons and their Histories . 88
Arsenic — Mercury — Antimony.
7
; CONTENTS
CHAP. PAGE
VIII Royal and Historic Poisoners . . . loi
. King John and Maud FitzWalter— The Abbot of
Westminster poisoned — The murder of Sir Thomas
Overbury — The Earl of Leicester and his Victims —
Mysterious death of the son of Peter the Great — The
Gaekwar of Baroda tried for attempt to poison
Colonel Phayre.
IX Poisons tried on Human Beings . . 109
Vivisection of Criminals— Poisons and Antidotes
administered to Criminals — Brassavola and Fallopius
— A Charlatan's Challenge at Oxford — English
Experimenters.
X The Slow and Time Poisons of Mediaeval
Times ....... 113
Early Records of "Slow" Poisons — Attempt to
poison Queen Elizabeth — Death of Macchiavelli —
Death of Elisabetta Sirani.
XI The Italian School of Poisoners . . .120
The Venetian Poisoners — A Professional Poisoner's
Fees — The Poisoners of Rome — Toffana — La Spara.
XII The Mystery of the Borgias . . .128
History of the Family — Pope Alexander VI — Cesare
— Lucrezia — Preparing the Poison — Death of Alex-
ander— Death of Cesare — The Borgia Poison.
XIII Poison Mysteries in Early Scottish History 142
Earl of Moray — The Duke of Albany and Margaret
Drummond — Jean Douglas and James V — Mys-
terious death of the Earl of Atholl — The death of
Robert Stewart, Earl of Orkney — The Earl of Dun-
bar and Secretary Cecil.
XIV Historic Poison Cases in France . . .145
Francis II and Mary Queen of Scots — Catharine de'
Medici — Mysterious death of Gabrielle D'Astr^es —
Death of the Duchess of Orleans — Glaser and Exali
— The Mania for Poisoning in France — The Marquise
de Brinvilliers and her Crimes — Sainte-Croix —
Chambre de Poisons — Le Vigoreux, La Voisin and
Le Sage — Marechal de Luxembourg, Duchesse de
Bouillon and Comtesse de Soissons tried— Attempted
Poisoning of Louis XVIII — Poisons employed in
France in the XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries.
XV The Mystery of Amy Robsart's Death . 164
CONTENTS
CHAP.
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XX
XXI
XXII
XXIII
XXIV
XXV
XXVI
A Poison Mystery of the XVI Ith Century
The strange case of Sir Euseby Andrew.
A Mystery of the Austrian Court in the
XVIIth Century .....
Leopold, Emperor of Austria and Giuseppe Fran-
cesco Borri.
Poison Plots
Dread of Wholesale Poisoning — The Poisoning of
the Bishop of Rochester's Guests — The Act of Henry
Vlll making poisoning equivalent to High Treason
— Poisoners to be boiled alive — Poison Plot at Malta
— Attempted Wholesale Poisoning at Lima — Plot to
poison Ministers of State — Austrian Army Poison
Plot — Plot to Poison the Commissioner of Police.
Curious Methods Employed BY Secret Poisoners
Poisoned Food and Wine — ^Women Poisoners — The
Poisoned Goblet — Poisoned Shirts — Poisoned Robes
— Poison in Boot-Blacking — Poison Rings — Poison
by Injection — Poison in a Wooden Leg — Poisoned
Torch — Poisoned Candle — Poisoned Flowers —
Poisoned Bed.
Love-Philtres and Poisons ....
Pocula A matoria of the Greeks and Romans — Ovid
on the Love-Philtre — Mysterious Substances em-
ployed— Love-Philtre used by Eastern Nations —
Belief in Love-Philtres at the Present Day — ^Love-
Philtres used by African native Tribes.
Poisons in Food ......
Poison in Beer — Poison in Food — Poison in Honey —
Poison in Cocoa and Chocolate.
Poisons used in Warfare ....
Poison Gas — Poison and pisease Organisms dropped
by Aircraft.
Criminal Poisoning with Bacteria
A Petrograd Poison Mystery — Criminal use of Diph-
theria, Typhoid and Cholera Organisms.
Poison Habits ......
Opium — Morphine — Chloroform — Ether —
Chlorodyne — Cocaine.
Hashish and Hashish-Eaters.
Ganja and Bhang — Use in Antiquity — Hashish and
its Effects.
Poisons in Fiction .....
PAGE
171
178
186
211
216
223
230
238
248
254
10
CONTENTS
Part II
POISON MYSTERIES
CHAP. PAGE
I The Mystery of Lawford Hall — The Curious
Case of Elizabeth Fenning
II The Case of Madame Lafarge
III The Case of Madeline Smith
IV The Bravo Mystery
V The Rugeley Mystery .
VI The Case of Dr. Pritchard
VII The Case of Dr. Lamson
VIII The Pimlico Mystery
IX The Maybrick Case
X The Lambeth Poison Mysteries
XI Some Poison Mysteries in P' range
XII The Horsford Case
XIII American Poison Mysteries .
XIV The Southwark Poison Mystery
XV Some Irish Poison Mysteries
XVI The Devereux Case
XVII The Crippen Case .
XVIII The Mystery of the Seddons
XIX The Dalkeith Coffee Poison Case
XX The Agra Poisoning Mystery
XXI A Cornish Poison Mystery .
XXII The Armstrong Case
XXIII Some Poison Aspects of the Ilford Murder
Case ....
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Natives of the French Sudan, south of the Niger, preparing
their Arrow Poison and dipping their Weapons Frontispiece
TO FACE
PAGE
DrinkingCupof Unicorn's Horn (XVI It h Century) . . 58
Assay Cups of Rhinoceros Horn used to detect Poison in
Wine (XVIth Century) . . . . . .58
Bezoar Stones ........ 61
A Bottle with Representation of St. Nicholas of Bari used
for Aqua Toff ana . . . . . . page 123
Pope Alexander VI . . . . . . .128
Cesare Borgia . . . . . . . . 132
Lucrezia Borgia . . . . . . . .139
" A Cup of Wine with Cesare Borgia " . . .141
Marguerite D'Aubray, Marquise de Brinvilliers . . . 156
Bottle of Meat Juice and a Bottle containing Meat Juice and
Water exhibited in the May brick Case . . .312
Stethoscope and Pocket Medicine Case carried by Neill
Cream . . ....... 316
11
PART I
POISONS IN HISTORY AND ROMANCE
CHAPTER I
POISONS USED BY ANCIENT AND PRIMITIVE RACES
POISONS, those silent weapons capable of destroying life
mysteriously, secretly and without violence, have ever
had a peculiar fascination for mankind. They have played
so large a part in history at various periods, in romance as
well as in crime, that the subject is one which claims the
attention of every student of human nature.
A poison may be generally described as any substance
which, in a small quantity, when introduced into or absorbed
by a living organism, destroys life by rapid action. In another
sense a substance may be termed a poison that has a cumu-
lative effect if administered for a length of time so that it
ends fatally. Substances of this description were called
Venim, venyn, venum or bane in the Middle Ages, and also
termed " slow poisons."
It is probable that many substances which had the effect
of destroying life were observed and used by primitive man
from a period of remote antiquity. When injured in a tribal
battle, by perhaps a flint arrow-head or stone axe, he no doubt
sought for something to revenge himself on his enemy. In his
search for curative substances he also found noxious ones,
which produced unpleasant effects when applied to the point
of a weapon destined to enter the internal economy of an
opponent. He doubtless observed that the arrow-head and
spear on which the blood of former victims had dried caused
wounds which often proved fatal, owing to the action of what
we now term septic poisons. This may have led him to
experiment with the juices of plants till he discovered some-
thing of a more deadly character. The observations of
primitive man as to the poisonous effects of plants on animal
life is evident from some of the names which he gave to them
15
i6 POISON MYSTERIES ^
in early times. Instances of these are perpetuated in cowbane
(the water hemlock), which often has a fatal effect on cattle ;
sowbane, so called, says Parkinson in his Herbal, as it was
observed to kill swine ; wolf's bane, leopard's bane, henbane,
and many others which might be mentioned, showing that
primitive man must have observed the evil effects on the
animal whose name he associated with them.
In primeval times both the poisonous and medicinal pro-
perties of plants appear to have been first discovered and
kept secret by the most observant and intelligent members of
pastoral and nomadic tribes. The possessor of such secrets
wielded an immense power over his fellows and often com-
bined the office of medicine man and priest. He reserved to
himself as much as possible the knowledge which he had
acquired of plants and their uses, and particularly those which
would produce stupor, delirium and death, for by these means
he was enabled to exert a greater influence over others.
The study, therefore, of the poisons employed by primitive
races for destroying life in animals and man is one of con-
siderable interest. Arrow-heads and spear-heads, worked
with depressions, probably for holding poisons, have been
found in cave remains of the palaeolithic period in France.
Laigneau is of the opinion that these weapons were first used
to destroy large animals, such as the bison and reindeer, and
were probably also used in tribal warfare.
xo^iKov, the Greek word used to denote poison, takes its
origin from a word signifying a bow, which probably sym-
bolized a poison-tipped arrow, a custom still practised by
savage tribes in various parts of the world. It seems but a
natural sequence that man should have turned to his own
account the knowledge he acquired of the effects of the sub-
stances which proved deadly when introduced into the body
by either external or internal means, as in them he found a
more secure and secret weapon by means of which he could
rid himself of the objects of his jealousy, hatred or revenge.
The Greek toxican, from which the word toxicology is
derived, is believed to have been used for the poisonous sub-
stance into which the arrow-heads were dipped.
Poisoned arrows are mentioned by several of the early
writers, including Homer, Horace and Ovid. The latter tells
POISONS USED BY ANCIENT RACES 17
how the blood of vipers was used to poison weapons, and there
was a general belief that disease and death were caused by
poisoned arrows shot by an offended deity, as instanced in
the mythical story of Apollo, whose darts were supposed to
smite man with pestilence.
The Scythians are known to have used poisons and mixed
the venom they employed with human blood. Certain tribes of
the Caucasus are said to have employed viper-venom mixed
with decomposed human blood serum. Aristotle and Strabo
state that the Celts were accustomed to poison their arrows
and weapons, while Pliny and Celsus refer to the practice
among the Gauls. As late as the seventh century poisoned
arrows were used by the Dacians and the Dalmatians on the
shores of the Danube, and among the Goths it seems to have
been a common custom. Almost every savage tribe and
people throughout the world have been found to have their
own particular poison for this purpose, and there is little
doubt that this method of making the wound caused by the
weapons more deadly, has been practised from a period of
remote antiquity.
Although most of the substances employed and the methods
of preparation are now known to us, there are others about
which little or no information can be obtained. The secret of
the poison used by many barbaric tribes is still most jealously
guarded and is only known to certain chiefs and their families,
or the medicine men of the tribe, who pass on the knowledge
to their successors. The substances used for lethal purposes
are both of animal and vegetable origin, and include poisonous
insects and fish, snake venoms and poisonous plants, which are
used alone or mixed together. These substances are not equally
effective, as the active principle by age tends to decompose,
but if the poison be freshly prepared, as it often is, it generally
proves fatal. Lewin, however, states that he found an arrow
poison used by the Bushmen in Australia still active after
remaining for ninety years in a Berlin museum.
The poisons used by the various tribes of Bushmen of Africa
vary according to the district in which they live. Livingstone
states, that those who inhabited the Kalahari district used
the entrails of a small caterpillar for poisoning their spears
and arrows. When drawn over a sore, this insect, which is
B
i8 POISON MYSTERIES
known to the natives as " Nga," causes the most excruciating
agony, and those wounded by arrows smeared with this poison
die slowly in a condition of violent delirium.
Baines says the Bushmen squeeze the grub gradually be-
tween the forefinger and thumb, when a colourless fluid exudes
which is smeared over the arrow-head, forming an imper-
ceptible coating. Modern investigators who have studied
the properties of this curious poison , state, that its action
strongly resembles some of the snake venoms and that it
will retain its properties for an indefinite time. Livingstone
also mentions a curious fact that the natives consider that
the best antidote to the poison is to swallow the grub.
A very powerful poison employed by other tribes of Bush-
men for their arrow- and spear-heads is said by Burchell to
be prepared from Amaryllis disticha, various species of
Euphorbium and Acocanthera, alone or mixed with snake
venom, and a species of black spider or beetle poison.
The Bushmen or " Bosjermans " of the South African dis-
trict called " Kalahari " use the juice of the leaf beetle, or the
Diamphidia simplex. Lewin, who examined the insect, found
in its body besides inert fatty acids, a toxalbumin which
causes paralysis and finally death. Boehm, after examin-
ation, states that the poison from the larva also belongs to the
toxalbumins. The poison grubs are of a pale flesh colour,
similar to the silkworm and are about three-quarters of an
inch in length. When a wound is made by an arrow poisoned
with this exudation the most intolerable agony is caused,
which proves fatal.
The Somali prepare a very deadly poison from various
species of Acocanthera which they call Waba, Wabayo or
Ouabaio, to which they sometimes add snake venom.
The Ovambos of South- West Africa employ a species of
Adenium as an arrow poison, while the seeds of the stro-
phanthus (Strophanthus hispidus or kombe) are largely used
by the tribes who inhabit the districts near the Congo and the
Zambezi.
The arrow poison of the Pygmies of Central Africa, in which
the red ant forms an ingredient, is described by Stanley, and
is so very deadly that a single arrow has been known to kill
an elephant.
POISONS USED BY ANCIENT RACES 19
According to a recent writer on Malay poisons/ native
poisoners frequently use narcotic plants to stupefy their
victims as a preliminary to robbing them. They also employ
sand, powdered glass, quicklime and other powders to dis-
concert their pursuers. Some of them claim to be able to
know a method of causing loss of voice lasting seven or eight
days, by the administration of certain poisons by the mouth.
Gimlette asserts that two or three clinical cases have
occurred in Kelantan in which it was alleged that the witnesses
in court could not give evidence for this reason.
Malay cunning is proverbial, but it is not generally known
that the natives are accustomed to use poison in the same
manner as employed in ancient times, namely by mixing it
with honey which is sometimes smeared on the under surface
of a knife. The poisoner then shares a meal with his enemy
and divides a water-melon in half with the poisoned blade,
but is careful to eat only the upper and harmless portion as
his share of the fruit. This method is said to be common in
Tregganu, where potassium cyanide is employed for the
purpose.
The Malays are said to have a knowledge of slow poisons
which they call " time-poisons," by means of which they can
give a single dose of poison and time the death of the victim
within three, six, or even twelve months, according to the dose
and the particular combination used. Native experts, how-
ever, say that the idea of this " time-poison " is unfounded,
but they know that the effect of certain deadly poisons is
greatly accelerated or delayed if certain fruits or vegetables,
such as water-melon or cucumbers happen to be eaten soon
after the ingestion of the poison.
Some of the Malays believe that poisoned food can be recog-
nized by the shadow of the right hand and fingers not being
cast on eating rice. Others believe that a stirring rod of ivory
will become darkened if poison has been put into the food,
and in Perak a spoon made of the beak of a horn-bill ^ is said
to turn black if touched by anything of a poisonous nature.
1 Malay Poisons and Charm Cures, John D. Gimlette, M.R.C.S.
1923.
2 For the use of horns as antidotes or indicators of poison, see
page 55.
20 POISON MYSTERIES
The Malays use many different vegetable poisons for theii
blow-pipe darts, some of which are extremely powerful, but
curiously enough some are poisonous to certain animals and
not to others, and many of the poisons which destroy human
life may be eaten with impunity by graminivorous animals.
Thus, opium does not poison pigeons, tobacco and hemlock
do not injure goats, and henbane can be eaten by rabbits.
The Malay jungle natives have special markings on their
blow-pipe darts, by means of which they differentiate their
various poisons. That of the upas tree is specially marked
to distinguish it from the others.
The sap of the upas-tree {Antiaris toxicaria), the active
principle of which is called Antiarin, is used as a poison for
their darts by the natives throughout the Eastern Archi-
pelago, including Java and Borneo. It is extremely powerful
and will sometimes cause death in thirty minutes after a wound
is received. It is often mixed with the venom of snakes,
scorpions or centipedes and occasionally with arsenic.
The upas-tree sap is collected in primitive vessels fashioned
from palm leaves, which are then suspended a few feet above
the hre. The boiling process is somewhat protracted and
during the whole time the sap is continually stirred. During
this operation the liquid is transformed into a thick viscid
mass and in this condition it is withdrawn from the fire.
When cold the sap is a solidj hard, yet brittle substance,
so before it is set, the leaf is rolled up with its soft contents,
the two ends tied with rattan and the poison thus kept till it
is required.
The darts, which are projected by the natives with blow-
pipes, consist of strips of palmwood from 20 to 30 cm. in length ;
they are pointed at one end and a quantity of poison is then
removed from its palm-leaf receptacle and ground up until
it is of the consistency of flour. It is then mixed with water
and stirred up until it becomes a thin paste, which is smeared
upon the points of the darts. The process of preparation
takes place before a fire, and when completed they are placed
with their points towards the fire until the upas sap has dried
into the wood. In the case of the darts that are required for
larger game, the point of the weapon is split open and a thin
metal wedge or plate is inserted and the whole point is then
POISONS USED BY ANCIENT RACES 21
smeared oyer with the poison. The opposite end of the dart
comprises a small conical butt made of the soft pith of the
sago palm. The darts are carried in small bamboo quivers,
which are fixed into the loin-cloth of the native, the points
being protected by a piece of animal skin.
North American Indians employ a poison called " Caramari,"
which they prepare from the roots of a plant found along the
sea coast. It is prepared by being burnt in earthen pipkins
and to the residue is added a species of spider, hairy worms,
bats' wings, the head and tail of a fish called " Teborino,"
toads and mancanillas. These substances are set over a fire
and heated in pots till they come to the consistency of a paste.
The Choco Indians of Colombia, South America, use a
poison which they extract from a tree frog which they hold
on a stick near a fire, when the heat causes the glands of the
skin to secrete the poisonous fluid.
The Jivaro Indians of the Amazon use a vegetable poison
called "jambi" for their arrows, which is said to be made
from a species of vine which grows in great profusion through-
out the Upper Amazon zone. The process for extracting the
poison as described by Up de Graff ^ is simple.
" The vine is cut into sections a foot in length, and the thin,
hard outer crust of bark is carefully removed by scraping.
The m^ain bark, white when first exposed to the air, turns
brown in just the same way as an apple. This inner bark is
scraped into fine shavings by means of shells and flints, and
these are placed in a colander which rests upon a pot in which
water is boiling. The water is poured over the contents of
the colander repeatedly, until the constant action on it has
drawn out the alkaloid, when the lifeless shavings are thrown
away and the residue is boiled down until it resembles,
both in consistency, colour and smell, plain chocolate. While
still warm, it is poured into a bamboo receptacle and when cool
it becomes semi-solidified."
The head of the arrow is dipped in the " jambi " and dried
in the sun or before the fire.
These arrows have a swift and painless effect on animals
and birds of the forest, and after a wound from the poisoned
dart projected from a blow-gun, so long as the skin is broken
^ Head Hunters of the Amazon, F. W. Up de Graff. 1922.
22 POISON MYSTERIES
at any point, they are killed within about two minutes.
Experiments carried out on domestic animals have proved
that the poison acts painlessly, the effect being much the same
as an overdose of morphine, but despite its proved deadliness
" jambi " is never used by the Head Hunters in warfare.
One of the most curious preparations in use among the
North American Indians is the so-called " Black Poison,"
the effects of which are well known around the lakes of the
Winnipeg basin and in the Swan River district. Some time
after administration it changes the colour of the skin from
brownish yellow or copper colour to a sooty black and at the
same time causes hair to grow on unusual parts, such as the
cheek bones. Its first effects are sickness, headache, and pain in
the back and limbs. Afterwards, ulceration and sores break out
in various parts of the body, chiefly over the joints and more
particularly the knuckles. When prepared, the poison is
said to be a brown snuff-like powder with a slight and rather
sickening smell. A small quantity administered in food
appears to be sufficient to produce these effects. It is said to
be partly composed of Rhus toxicodendron mixed with a
dried acrid matter secreted by the glands in the skin of a
species of toad.
The Indian tribes indigenous to California have a curious
method of using certain plants to stupefy or poison fish. One
of the most effective is " soap root " (Chlorogalum pomer-
idianum.) Besides providing a substitute for soap the crushed
pulp is dropped into the water, generally into a small pool
or stream, and then stirred. The fish are stupefied by the
poison, float to the surface and are captured either by hand
or in a basket. Another plant employed for this purpose is
known as " blue-curls," or vinegar weed {Trichostemma lancer-
latum) .
Other tribes of Indians in South America use curare, which
they extract from a certain species of strychnos and other
plants, which were first brought to England by Sir Walter
Ralegh in 1595. Although a deadly poison when introduced
into a wound or injected under the skin, curare is practically
harmless when swallowed ; indeed Humbolt states the Indians
lick it off their fingers and use it as a stomachic tonic.
The Ainos of Japan are said to have used a preparation made
POISONS USED BY ANCIENT RACES 23
from aconite and tobacco, while the natives of the New Hebrides
are stated to smear their arrows with damp earth containing
the tetanus bacillus which infects the person wounded by
them.
Besides the use of poisons for offensive purposes, the insti-
tution of trial by ordeal still exists among barbaric tribes
to-day, especially in Africa. The substances employed vary
with the locality inhabited by the tribe. Muavi, which is
used by several tribes in Western Africa, is prepared by scrap-
ing the bark of a poisonous tree, known only to the witch-
doctors. A decoction of the scrapings is made with water and
the resulting draught, which is of a highly poisonous nature,
is administered to the suspected person. The action of muavi
is generally rapid; vomiting is quickly caused, followed, by
convulsions and death. When both the accuser and the
accused are seized with vomiting the natives declare that the
draught has been badly prepared, and should the result not
prove fatal to either party the test is repeated. When the
guilt of one of the parties has been established by death, his
property is at once confiscated and his wife and children are
killed. So great is the belief of the natives in the infallibility
of the Muavi test that they never hesitate to submit them-
selves to the trial and are said frequently to volunteer to go
through the ordeal in order to prove their innocence.
The Balantes and other tribes who inhabit the West Coast
of Africa employ Sassy bark (Erythroplceum Guineense) for their
trial by ordeal. They prepare the poison by mixing the finely
scraped or powdered bark with powdered glass, together with
the dried and powdered viscera of the victims of the preceding
trial. When required for use the mixture is made into a paste
with water, about two spoonsful being administered for^ a
dose.
It is customary for the chief of another tribe to preside at
the ordeal trial, whose duty it is to see that it is properly
carried out. Each person who undergoes the trial has to
pay him a fee in cash or in kind, the latter being in the form
of rice, chickens or goats. The preparer of the poison and
his assistants also receive an honorarium. When one of the
Balantes is accused of a crime or witchcraft he must undergo
the trial, as after once being suspected he is no longer
24 POISON MYSTERIES
protected by the ties of bbod and friendship, and a father
may even denounce his son or a husband his wife.
Other West African tribes use the Calabar bean, commonly
called the Ordeal bean, which contains a powerful poisonous
principle called Physostigmine, a drug which is of great
value to ophthalmic surgeons to-day in the treatment
of the eyes. It is so powerful that a fiftieth part of a grain
is considered a poisonous dose. It was customary at one
time, in Old Calabar and at the mouth of the Niger, where the
plant grows, to destroy it whenever found, a few only being
preserved to supply seeds for judicial purposes, and of these
seeds the store was kept in the custody of the native chief.
Now it is preserved and the beans exported to Europe on
account of the value of their active principle in medicine.
Witchcraft plays an important part in the daily life of most
African natives and to witchcraft they attribute every ill that
befalls them. One kind is practised secretly by evil-doers
and the other by the witch-doctors with the view of destroying
the effects of the evil-doers. The witch-doctors or medicine-
men are undoubtedly the most powerful individuals in their
tribes ; they hold the lives of all in their hands, and are daily
employed to satisfy the passions of their neighbours. Accord-
ing to native ideas, death or sickness never occurs through
natural causes, but is always the result of somebody's act.
Whenever anyone is accused of having practised witchcraft
or of having committed any other crime, the Calabar bean or
the trial by ordeal is used to decide the case, except when the
accuser is a witch-doctor, when both the accuser and the
accused have to submit to the test.
Roscoe in his book, The Soul of Central Africa, alludes
to a mysterious poison prepared by the medicine-men of
Ankole. It is a tribal custom that should the king feel ill,
or through age find his strength failing him, it is his duty
to end his life by taking a dose of poison. The ingredients
'for the fatal draught are always kept at hand by the royal
medicine-man, who stores them in a crocodile's egg. " It
must have been a strong poison," says the explorer, " for it
took effect rapidly, ending the king's life in a few moments.
I could not, however, discover the ingredients ; the man abso-
lutely refused to divulge the secret. The king thus experi-
POISONS USED BY ANCIENT RACES 25
enced no lengthened illness, but passed away in a few minutes
after swallowing the fatal potion and his body was at once
prepared for the ceremony."
Thus to primitive and barbaric people in various parts of
the world we owe much of our knowledge of the properties
of many powerful vegetable poisons.
CHAPTER II
POISONS USED BY THE EGYPTIANS, GREEKS,
ROMANS, HEBREWS, CHINESE AND HINDUS IN
ANCIENT TIMES
MANY mysterious poisons are referred to in the legends
and sagas that have come down to us from the dim
ages of the past.
The earliest deity associated with poisons is Gula, whose
name was revered by the Sumerians about 4500 B.C. She
was known as " The Mistress of Charms and Spells," the
"Terrible Goddess," " ControUer of noxious poisons," and
was the deified form of the sorceress. Medical schools at
Borsippa and Sirpurra were under her protection. She is
described on a cuneiform tablet, said to have been written
about 1400 B.C., as : —
" Gula, the woman, the mighty one, the prince of all women.
His seed with a poison not curable
Without issue ; in his body may she place
All the days of his life.
Blood and pus like water may he pour forth."
Ages ago a mysterious country in the far North was sup-
posed to be ruled and dominated by sorcerers and kindred
beings, all of whom were said to be children of the Sun. Here
dwelt yEetes, Perses, Hecate, Medea and Circe. To Hecate is
ascribed the foundation of sorcery and the discovery of
poisonous plants. Her knowledge of magic and spells was
supposed to be unequalled. She transmitted her power to
Medea, whose wonderful exploits are described in early Greek
mythology, and who by her magic arts subdued the dragon
that guarded the golden fleece and assisted Jason to perform
his famous deeds. Hecate's garden is described by the poets
as being enclosed in lofty walls with thrice-folding doors of
26
POISONS USED IN ANCIENT TIMES 27
ebony, which were guarded by terrible forms, and only those
who bore the leavened rod of expiation and the concealed
conciliatory offering could enter. Towering above was the
temple of the dread sorceress, where the ghastly sacrifices
were offered and all kinds of horrible spells worked.
According to tradition, after Medea's adventures with Jason
she returned with him to Thessaly, and on their arrival they
found ^son, the father of Jason, and Pelias, his uncle, who
had usurped the throne, both old and decrepit. Medea was
requested to exert her magical powers to make the old man
young again, an operation which she is said to have speedily
performed by infusing the juice of certain potent plants into
his veins, and thus foreshadowing a recent operation for
rejuvenating the old by means of injecting the solution of a
certain gland.
Medea became the wife of ^geus, king of Athens, whose son,
Theseus, had been brought up in exile and who resolved to
return to Athens to claim his rights. Medea, hearing of this,
and for some reason greatly resenting it, prepared a poisoned
goblet and gave it to .Egeus at an entertainment which he
gave to Theseus, with the intent that he should hand it to his
son. At the critical moment the king cast his eyes on the
sword of Theseus, recognizing it as the weapon which he had
given to his son when a child, directing that it should be
brought by him when a man as a token of the mystery of
his birth. The king at once threw the goblet from him and
embraced his son, and as tradition has it, Medea fled from
Athens in a chariot drawn by dragons.
Circe's charms were more seductive and romantic. She
is said to have been endowed with exquisite beauty, which she
employed to allure travellers to her territory. On their land-
ing she entreated and enticed them to drink from her enchanted
cup, but no sooner was the draught swallowed than the
unfortunate stranger was turned into a hog and driven by
the magician to her sty, where he still retained the conscious-
ness of what he had been and lived to repent his folly.
These mythological stories tend to show that some know-
ledge of poisonous substances existed at a very remote period.
In ancient Egypt a certain crude scientific knowledge
probably existed from a period of great antiquity, and some
28 POISON MYSTERIES
of the earliest deities, especially the god Thoth, are associ-
ated with the genesis of science, arts and magic, Thoth
is reputed to have been the author of six divine works dealing
with these subjects. He was identified by the Greeks with
Hermes Trismegistos, or the " Thrice Great," to whom they
attributed the foundation of the science of chemistry. Menes,
the earliest Egyptian king of whom we have record, was said
to have studied the properties of plants, and other Egyptian
rulers cultivated the art of medicine, probably through the
priests, who were the chief practitioners in the art of healing
in those early times. They apparently gathered knowledge
of certain poisonous bodies, both vegetable and mineral.
They were learned in the art of alchemy and initiated votaries
into its mysteries in their schools of science. The secrets
taught were forbidden to be revealed under penalty of death,
and therefore, probably, many of the discoveries they made
were lost, but there is sufficient evidence to prove that they
were conversant with crude arsenic, opium, mandrake, lead and
other poisonous substances. This knowledge was probably
handed down by oral tradition as part of the priestcraft for
centuries before it was committed to writing.
The earliest known record of the actual preparation of a
substance of a lethal nature is mentioned in an Egyptian
papyrus, now in the Louvre, in which the following sentence,
as translated by Duteuil, occurs : " Pronounce not the name
of I.A.O. under the penalty of the peach."
The Egyptians were probably the first to practise dis-
tillation, and from the stones of certain fruits they apparently
discovered that they could extract a powerful poison which
we now know as prussic acid.
The Hebrews in ancient times were also acquainted with the
use of poisonous substances. Arsenic was known to them as
" Sam," aconite as " Boschka," and they are said to have
known of the poisonous properties of ergot which they called
" Son."
Coming to times of early culture in Greece, the knowledge
of poisons had made a considerable advance. The Greeks
knew of arsenic in the form of realgar and orpiment, antimony,
mercury, gold, silver, copper and lead, and they probably
had a knowledge of their poisonous properties, as they
POISONS USED IN ANCIENT TIMES 29
recommend hot oil as an antidote in a case of poisoning and
mention other means to promote vomiting and prevent a
poison being absorbed into the system.
Of the vegetable poisons known and used by the Greeks
hemlock appears to have been chiefly employed. They
looked upon suicide under certain conditions as a noble act,
and sanctioned the use of the poison cup by those who desired
to terminate their existence on earth. They also employed
poison as a means of execution. The State Poison was chiefly
composed of a species of hemlock called cicuta, the seeds of
which were pounded in a mortar as the first step in prepar-
ation. Several of the early historians, including Plato, de-
scribe the action of the plant used, but its identification has
long been a matter of dispute. From all Accounts the poison
draught does not appear to have been either very powerful
or rapid in its action, as a second dose was often found to
be necessary before death ensued.
At the death of Phocion it is recorded that " having drunk
all the hemlock juice, the quantity was found insufficient and
the executioner refused to prepare more unless he was paid
twelve drachmas." When Seneca also wished to end his
life, a friend and physician, at his request, procured for him
some of the Athenian State Poison, but when he took it the
effect was inadequate.
The circumstances attending the death of Socrates, which
happened in the year 402 B.C., are thus recounted by Plato :
" When the fatal cup was brought he asked what it was
necessary for him to do. ' Nothing more,' replied the ser-
vant of the judges, ' than as soon as you have drunk of the
draught, to walk about until you find your legs become weary
and afterwards lie down upon your bed.'
" He took the cup without any emotion or change in his
countenance and, looking at him in a steady and assured
manner,
" ' Well ! ' said he, ' what say you of this drink ? '
" ' May a libation be made out of it ? '
" Upon being told that there was only enough for one dose,
' At least,' said he, ' we may pray to the gods as is our duty
and implore them to make our exit from this world and our
last stage happy, which is what I most ardently beg of them.'
30 POISON MYSTERIES
" Having spoken these words he remained silent for some
time and then drank off the whole draught.
" After reproving his friends for indulging in loud lamenta-
tions, he continued to walk about as he had been directed
until he found his legs grow weary. Then he lay down upon
his back and the person who had administered the poison
went up to him and examined for a little time his feet and legs,
and then squeezing his foot strongly, asked whether he felt
him ? Socrates replied that he did not. He then did the
same to his legs, and proceeding upwards in this way, showed
us that he was cold and stiff, and he afterwards approached
him and said to us that when the effect of the poison reached
the heart Socrates would depart. And now the lower parts
of his body were cold, when he uncovered himself and said,
which were his lasl^ words, ' Crito, we owe iEsculapius a cock.
Pay the debt and do not forget it.'
" ' It shall be done,' replied Crito. ' But consider whether
you have anything else to say.'
" Socrates answered in the negative, but was in a short
time convulsed. The man then uncovered him ; his eyes
were fixed and when Crito observed this he closed his eyelids
and his mouth."
The poison which is given the general name of (paQ/uaHov
by Plato, is termed hcovelov by Xenophon in relating the
execution of Theramenes, whose death occurred but forty
years after Socrates. The same word is again used by Plut-
arch in describing the State Poison by which Phocion fell a
victim to the Athenians in the year B.C. 317.
Aristophanes, who was contemporary with Socrates, fur-
nishes further evidence that the State Poison was commonly
known in Athens by the name xcbvetov, for in " The Frogs,"
which was acted many years before his death, the following
allusion to the poison occurs : —
Hercules : Then there is a short and beaten road — that by
the mortar.
Bacchus : Speakest thou of hemlock, then ?
Hercules : Most certainly.
Bacchus : A journey cold and winterly forsooth, for it im-
mediately congeals the shins.
Pliny and the other Latin authors use the word cicuta when
alluding to the State Poison of the Greeks. Dioscorides {circa
POISONS USED IN ANCIENT TIMES 31
A.D. 40) in his work on Materia Medica, describing the cicuta,
says it has a knotted stem and likens it to fennel. " Its branches
shoot with umbels at their summits, while it bears a whitish
flower with a heavy smell and a fruit like that of anise, but
whiter." From this it was evidently an umbelliferous plant.
Pliny refers to the spots on the stem, which further identifies
the plant as the Conium maculatum, or hemlock.
According to Sibthorpe, Conium maculatum grows in
various parts of Greece and in the vicinity of Athens, and no
other poisonous umbelliferous plant grows in that country.
This seems conclusive evidence that the cicuta of the Greeks
was the plant we know as Conium maculatum.
In addition to this, Pliny states that the cicuta (described
by him as the Athenian State Poison) grows in Attica and at
Megara, and describes the seeds and leaves as particularly
fatal when drunk in wine, the former producing the most
deadly effects.
The clinical effects of the drug as graphically described by
Plutarch are identical with those produced by conium or
hemlock. He mentions the coldness of the extremities, con-
cluding with its influence on the brain, which would account
for the strangeness of the last words of Socrates, referring
to a sacrifice to the deity who presided over the Medical Art.
It is probable that opium was sometimes combined with
hemlock, judging from the statement of Theophrastus, who
was born only twenty-eight years after the death of Socrates.
He says : " Thrasyas, the Mantinian, stated that by making
use of the juices of cicuta, the poppy and such other things,
he had discovered a substance which occasioned death easily
and without pain, and so portable and minute that the
weight of a dgaxji^'f] (about sixty grains) was sufficient and
absolutely irremediable." Further, that it was capable of
being preserved for any time without alteration. That a
powerful preparation and certain in effect was required at the
time of the death of Socrates, is evident from the caution of
the executioner, who states that none of the contents of the
cup could be spared. Judging from all accounts, and the
evidence afforded by the description of its action, there seems
little doubt that the Athenian State Poison consisted of
hemlock, probably in the form of the concentrated juice of
32 POISON MYSTERIES
the leaves, to which a proportion of poppy juice was added
to render its action more certain.
A curious custom prevailed among the inhabitants of the
island of Ceos in which poison played a part. When the
old men found they were no longer of service to the State
and began to feel life a burden, they assembled at a banquet
of death and, with their heads crowned with chaplets, cheer-
fully drained the poison cup. A relic of this ancient custom
was once practised at Marseilles, where a poison was kept by
the public authorities, of which hemlock was an ingredient.
A dose of this was allowed by the magistrates to anyone who
could bring a sufficient reason why he should deserve death.
Valerius Maximus observes, " This custom came from Greece,
particularly from the island of Ceos, where I saw an example
of it in a woman of great quality who, having lived very
happy ninety years, obtained leave to die in this way, lest by
living longer she should happen to see a change of her good
fortune."
The reputed poisonous property of bull's blood is recorded
by various ancient writers, and it is stated that ^Eson, Midas
King of Phrygia, Plutarch and Themistocles the Athenian
leader employed it as a means of suicide. It is probable that
some strong poisonous vegetable substance such as cicuta was
mixed with it.
The symptoms and signs which were accepted in early
times as evidence of poisoning are sufficiently crude to inspire
us with considerable doubt as to the reliability of many of the
cases narrated. That there were certain post-mortem appear-
ances which were generally considered as evidence of death
by poison is recorded by Cicero, Tacitus and other early
writers. In the account given by Suetonius of the death of
Germanicus, who was poisoned by Piso at the instance of
Tiberius, they are enumerated as " livid spots on the face and
body, and foam at the mouth." It was further generally
believed that worms could not generate in the bodies of persons
who had died from the effect of poison.
Dioscorides throws a further light on the poisons of
antiquity in his work on Materia Medica, which for fifteen
centuries or more remained the chief authority on that subject.
He mentions cantharides, copper, mercury, lead and arsenic.
POISONS USED IN ANCIENT TIMES 33
Among the animal poisons he includes toads, salamanders,
poisonous snakes, a peculiar kind of honey, and the blood
of the ox, probably after it had decomposed. The sea-hare
is frequently alluded to by the ancient Greeks, and was
evidently regarded by them as capable of producing a very
powerful poison. Domitian is said to have administered it
to Titus. It is supposed to have been one of the genus
Aplysia, among the gasteropods, and is described by the old
writers as a dreadful object which was neither to be touched
nor looked upon with safety.
Among the poisonous plants enumerated by Dioscorides are
the poppy, black and white hellebore, henbane, mandragora,
hemlock, elaterium, the juices of a species of euphorbia, and
apocynae. The black and white hellebore were known to
the Romans and used by them as an insecticide, and Pliny
states that the Gauls used a preparation of veratrum to poison
their arrows. Arsenic, in the form of the native realgar and
orpiment, was employed by the Greeks as a caustic and
for removing hair from the face ; but no mention is made of
it being used internally or as a poison. Copper, mercury,
and lead were also used in their medical treatment. The
study of poisons was forbidden for a long period, and Galen
mentions the fact that only a few philosophers dared treat the
subjects in their works.
Theophrastus states that the poison of most subtle oper-
ation of his time was extracted from wolf's bane (aconite) ;
no antidote had been discovered to this poison and it was a
capital crime to have in one's possession the plant from which
it was extracted. He tells us that in Ethiopia " there grows
a certain deadly root, with which the people smear their
arrows," and " In Scythia there are others some of which
kill at once those who eat them, some after an interval shorter
or longer, so that in the latter case men have a lingering
death." He thus relates the story of one Thrasyas of
Mantineia, who had discovered
" a poison which produces an easy and painless end ; he used
the juices of hemlock, poppy, and other such herbs, so com-
pounded as to make a dose of conveniently small size, weigh-
ing only somewhat less than a quarter of an ounce. For the
effects of this compound there is absolutely no cure, and it
c
34 POISON MYSTERIES
will keep any length of time without losing its virtue at all.
He used to gather his hemlock, not just anywhere, but at
Susa, or some other cold and shady spot ; and so too with
the other ingredients. His pupil Alexias was also clever and
no less skilful than his master, being also versed in the science
of medicine generally.
" At last Eudemus, the vendor of drugs, who had a high
reputation in his business, after making a wager that^he would
experience no effect before sunset, drank quite a moderate
dose, and it proved too strong for his power of resistance :
while the Chian Eudemus took a draught of hellebore and was
not purged. And on one occasion he said that in a single day
he took two and twenty draughts in the market-place as he
sat at his stall, and did not leave the place till it was evening,
and then he went home and had a bath and dined, and was
not sick. However, this man was able to hold out because he
had provided himself with an antidote ; for he said that after
the seventh dose he took a draught of tart vinegar with
pumice-stone dust in it, and later on took a draught of the
same in wine in like manner ; and that the virtue of the pumice-
stone dust is so great that if one puts it into a boiling pot of
wine it causes it to cease to boil, not merely for the moment,
but altogether, clearly because it has a drying effect and it
catches the vapour and passes it off. It was by this antidote
that Eudemus was able to contain himself in spite of the large
quantity of hellebore which he took."
Livy records that about 200 B.C. several persons of distinction
died in a mysterious way in Rome. At first it was thought that
they had succumbed to plague, but Quintus Fabius Maximus is
said to have been informed by a female slave, that the persons
had been poisoned and that she could reveal the names of the
guilty. The matter was laid before the consuls and the Senate.
The stipulated pardon was granted, and, guided by the slave,
the officers of justice are said to have discovered the poisoners,
among whom were women belonging to the noblest families of
Rome. Twenty in all were seized ; two of them, Cornelia
and Serpi, undertook to speak for the rest, and declared that
the drugs they had prepared were medicinal. They were told
that to prove this, the preparation they had made would be
tried on themselves and to this test they agreed. After
drinking the draughts it is said they all died. One hundred
and seventy more of the noblest ladies of Rome were seized.
POISONS USED IN ANCIENT TIMES 35
on similar information and condemned, and before that day,
says Livy, there was never an inquest on poisoning. To mark
this memorable example of what had never been done before,
it was resolved to have a nail driven into the temple of Jupiter.
A dictator was appointed for that mystic duty, a master of
the horse, and he drove a nail into the temple of Jupiter,
after which a stop was put to poisoning for two or three
centuries.
Unfortunately, however, the method of taking life by
poisons did not die out, but apparently increased and became
very comrnon in Rome under the early Emperors. Among
these nefarious practitioners, mostly apparently women,
was Locusta, who lived in the time of Nero. She had been
condemned to death for a case proved against her, but her
life was spared, so that she might use her nefarious methods
in the service of the State. She was employed by Agrippina
to poison the Emperor Claudius and to her is attributed the
death of Britannicus, whom Nero wished to remove from his
path. Britannicus was dining with his brother and the
Imperial family, and as was the custom of the Romans, hot
water was brought round by slaves to the table, the water
being heated to varied degrees to suit the taste of the drinker.
The cup of water handed to Britannicus proved to be too hot
and he gave it back to the attendant slave, who added cold
water to it, which addition is supposed to have contained the
poison, for no sooner had he swallowed the draught than he
fell back, gasping for breath. His mother, Agrippina, and
Octavia, his sister, became terror-stricken, but Nero, unmoved,
calmly remarked that he often had such fits in his youth
without danger, and the banquet proceeded.
A curious tradition which has survived from early times,
and still entertained by the ignorant, is, that if a body after
a sudden death rapidly decomposes, it is to be attributed to
the effects of poison, thus when Britannicus died it is recorded
that the Romans attempted to conceal his discoloured face
by the use of paint.
Locusta appears to have been appointed a kind of un-
official poisoner-in-ordinary to the Emperor, one of her
duties being to train pupils so that her secrets should not
be lost. She was encouraged to experiment with her know-
36 POISON MYSTERIES
ledge on slaves, who were liberally supplied for the purpose.
The Persians in ancient times are said to have studied with
care the art of poisoning. Plutarch and Ctesias relate that
Queen Parysatis, the mother of Cyrus the younger, during the
reign of Artaxerxes II (405-359 B.C.), poisoned her daughter-
in-law Statira by means of a knife, one side of the blade being
smeared with venom. A bird was set before the two queens
at supper ana was divided by the poisoned knife ; Parysatis
ate her half with impunity, but Statira died. Such is the
story, but there is no evidence to corroborate it. The Carth-
aginians were apparently also skilled in the art of poisons,
and it is related that they killed Regulus, the Roman general,
by this means.
With reference to the use of poisons in Persia in early times
the poet Nizami, in his Treasury of Secrets, relates a story of
rivalry between two court physicians which finally reached
such a point that they challenged one another to a duel or
ordeal by poison. It was agreed that each should take a
poison supplied by his antagonist, of which he should then
endeavour to counteract the effects by a suitable antidote.
The first prepared a poisonous draught " the fierceness of
which would have melted black stone " ; his rival drained
the cup and at once took an antidote which rendered it inno-
cuous. It was now his turn, and he picked a rose from the
garden, breathed an incantation over it, and bade his antago-
nist smell it, whereup(5n the latter at once fell down dead.
That his death was due simply to fear and not to any poison-
ous or magical property of the rose is clearly indicated by the
poet :
" Through this rose which the spell-breather ha5.xgiven him
Fear overmastered the foe and he gave up the ghost.
That one by treatment expelled the poison from his body.
While this one died of a rose from fear."
An incident which happened to the army led by Mark
Antony against the Parthians, and described by Plutarch,
is said to have been caused by aconite. At one time during
the expedition, the soldiers, being very short of provisions,
sought for roots and pot-herbs and met one that brought on
madness and death. " The eater immediately lost all memory
POISONS USED IN ANCIENT TIMES 37
and would busy himself in turning over every stone he met
with as if on some important pursuit. The camp was full of
unhappy men digging up and removing stones, till at last they
were carried off by bilious vomiting." Whole numbers, says
Plutarch, perished, and the Parthians still continued to harass
them. Antony is said to have frequently exclaimed : " Oh !
the ten thousand ! " alluding to the army which Xenophon
led in retreat both a longer way and through more numerous
conflicts and yet led in safety.
There is a story told of Alexander the Great that after
crossing the Cydenus, he was seized with a fever and was
warned by Parmenio in a letter not to take the medicine which
his physician offered to him for fear of poison. The phy-
sician's name was Philip, and Alexander so trusted him that
he gave him the letter to read, scanning his face meanwhile.
The calm air of the physician satisfied the ailing conqueror
and assured him that he might safely drink the potion.
The death of Alexander the Great, like that of many other
monarchs, is ascribed by some historians to poison, but
from Littre's investigations it would appear that the great
Emperor, debilitated by his drinking habits, contracted
malarial fever in the marshes round Babylon and died after
an illness of eleven days.
In India and the Far East, poisons have been used from
very early times, not only for the destruction of human life,
but also for destroying animals ; arsenic, aconite, opium and
many other poisonous mineral and vegetable substances
being employed for the purpose.
The Hindus have many curious traditions concerning
poisons, and like the Western nations attribute to some the
property of causing a lingering death, which can be controlled
by the will of the poisoner. The knowledge of the substances
employed is guarded with great secrecy and even now they
are not fully known. Blyth mentions a mysterious substance
known in India, called Mucor phycomyces, which is said to be
a species of fungus. When the spores are administered in warm
water they are said to attach themselves to the throat and
speedily develop and grow, with the result that in a few weeks
the respiratory organs are attacked and the victim is rapidly
carried off as if by a fatal disease. Nine active or virulent
38 POISON MYSTERIES
poisonous substances are mentioned by the ancient writers
on Hindu medicine. Some of them are at present still
unidentified, while others, there is little doubt, are varieties of
aconite, also opium, ganja {Cannabis indica), datura stramon-
ium, the roots of Nerium odorum, and Gloriosa superba, the
milky juices of Calatropis gigantea and Euphorbia nerii folia,
white arsenic, orpiment and the poison venom from snakes.
Most of the early Sanscrit MSS. are written on paper pre-
pared with orpiment to preserve them from the ravages of
insects. Three varieties of datura yield atropine, a powerful
poison. These plants were frequently employed in India for
putting a sudden end to domestic quarrels, and to this practice
maybe traced the origin of the custom of " Suttee," or widow-
burning, as the Brahmins found from experience that by
making a wife's life co-terminous with the husband's, the
average husband lived considerably longer. It is worthy of
note that the diamond was celebrated as a medicinal agent
by the Hindus, who prepared it by roasting it seven times
and then reducing it to powder. It was given in doses of one
grain as a powerful tonic.
Both the Chinese and Japanese, from ancient times down
to the present day, have paid a great deal of attention to the
study of poisons. From an early period the Chinese are said
to have used gold leaf for suicidal purposes, and at the
present time when a high official puts an end to his life it
is officially announced that he has "taken gold leaf."
At the time of the death of the Emperor Kwang Su, the
cause of which was enveloped in mystery, it was rumoured
that he did not die from natural causes, but committed suicide
by request. For some time previous to his death, it is said
that the Emperor had led a miserable existence and was
simply a ruler in name. The Dowager-Empress, Tzu Hsi,
had resolved that her nephew should precede her to the
tomb. She therefore convoked the Grand Council and as
a result of this conclave it was announced that Kwang Su
was dangerously ill from heart disease, but the offers of
the foreign Legations to send their medical officers were
firmly declined.
According to the story " at ten o'clock next morning the
Chief Eunuch, with two confidential attendants, entered the
POISONS USED IN ANCIENT TIMES 39
Little Palace where the Emperor was confined, and after
having ordered everybody out of the room he declared to
Kwang Su that the Empress was dying, and that it was
needful for him to predecease her.
" He then deposited on a table, pills of opium, a packet of
gold leaf, and some yellow silk plaited cord, promising to
return in three hours' time. If he found that neither the
opium nor the gold leaf had been used it would be his painful
duty to call upon the two assistants to strangle him witfe the
silken cord. Meanwhile, the two executioners would watch
the door of the room. It should be explained that a piece of
fine gold-leaf is placed over the lips, and, the breath being
deeply drawn, it is inhaled and obstructs the glottis, causing
immediate suffocation."
When the Chief Eunuch returned at one o'clock, he found
the opium pills had disappeared and Kwang Su was stretched
unconscious on his couch, but still breathing. It was stated
that he died at five o'clock, and the three-year-old Pou Yi
was at once brought to the Imperial Palace and proclaimed
Emperor.
The Japanese are said to import from China certain powerful
poisons prepared by the Chinese medicine men, the secret of
which is only known to them. They are thought to be a
mixture of both animal and mineral substances which have a
very deadly effect, though their exact composition is yet
undetermined.
CHAPTER III
ANTIDOTES TO POISON IN ANCIENT TIMES
JUDGING from the earliest laws on record, criminal poison-
ing does not appear to have been common amongst the
ancient Egyptians or Hebrews.
The first recorded instance of a judicial trial for poisoning
at Rome is stated by Livy to have been in the year 329 B.C.
In the time of Justinian (a.d. 483-565) the aid of the physician
was called in specially during the investigation of crime. Ac-
cording to the institutes or laws of that period, those who by
odious arts, whether by poison or by "magical whispers " (in-
cantations), took away the life of another, were punished with
death. A contract for the sale of a poison was also held to
be void " on the analogy of the contracts of partnership and
agency which have no power to deal with improper matters."
It seems appropriate that the first law to regulate the sale of
poisons should have been enacted in Italy. Thus as early as
1365 a statute was passed in Siena rendering it illegal to sell
red arsenic or corrosive sublimate to any slave, freed or other-
wise, or to any servant or person under twenty years of age.
These poisons could only be sold to an adult who was well
known to the apothecary. There was also a law in Perugia
in 1378 which enacted that a person could not obtain a poison
without the express permission of a doctor, which permit
should state the purpose for which it was intended to be used.
The statutes of Genoa (1488) amongst other items demanded
that in no medicament should substitution be allowed, or as the
statute reads " Ponere quid pro quo " without the doctor's ex-
press permission. The pharmacist was to be careful that honey
was not substituted for sugar, nor that the latter should serve
as a cover for the former", and that he should put neither rice
nor starch in anything composed of sugar, in whole or in part.
In ancient times there is little doubt that many people
40
ANTIDOTES TO POISON IN ANCIENT TIMES 41
died from the effects of poison without suspicion, al-
though on the other hand many more succumbed to the
sudden effects of latent and unrecognized diseases, such as
aneurism, peritonitis and others of which practically nothing
was known, whose deaths were wrongfully attributed to
poison. Before the period of judicial post-mortem examina-
tion, the practice was to expose the bodies for inspection
to those who were believed to be able to form a sufficiently
accurate judgment for themselves as to the cause of deat^k^
It was believed that poisonous substances had a peculiar
action on the heart and were capable of altering its substance
in such a manner that it resisted the action of a funeral pyre
and remained unconsumed. When the heart resisted the pyre
it was regarded as unmistakable evidence that the person had
perished by poison. If, in addition, the body from any cause
rapidly decomposed, such a sign was at once believed to be
conclusive of death from poison. This belief prevailed to a
greater or lesser extent down to the middle of the seventeenth
century.
From the time man first discovered the effects of
poisonous substances, he no doubt began to consider some
means of preventing their action if taken internally by acci-
dent. He sought also to find protection against the bites of
venomous animals, reptiles and mad dogs. Homer (900 B.C.)
in the " Odyssey," in the account of Ulysses' men, alludes
to a plant which Hermes recommended him to take when he
set out to rescue his followers : —
" Then take the antidote the Gods provide
The plant I give through all the direful power
Shall guard thee and avert the evil hour."
This is thought to refer to a herb called moli or molu which
is often mentioned by ancient writers. It is alluded to by
Theophrastus, Ovid, Pliny, Dioscorides and Galen and it was
considered to be a species of Allium. It is described by some
as a plant having an onion or squill-like odour, and was said to
grow in Arcadia and Campania.
The Hindus, like other ancient peoples, also had an idea of
a universal antidote against poisons, as expressed by the word
"agada."
42 POISON MYSTERIES
Apparently the ambition of the early Greek physicians
was to discover a universal antidote to all poisons, and many
of them appear to have devoted years and spent a great part
of their lives in attempting to find it. These antidotes were
called by the Greeks Alexipharmics, or Theriacs, the former
word being derived from the Greek "Alexipharmakos," mean-
ing that which keeps off a poison, and the noun " antiphar-
makon," an antidote.
OSe of the earliest writers on the subject was Nicander
of Colophon (185-135 B.C.), who was physician to Attains, King
of Bithynia, under whom he is said to have secured special
facilities for studying poisons, being allowed to experiment
upon condemned criminals. He was an hereditary priest of
Apollo at Clarus. He wrote a work in about a thousand
hexameters on
Theriaca, which deals with the bites of venomous animals
and six hundred hexameters on
Alexipharmica, which treats of poisonous substances when
swallowed by the mouth, and the use of emetics.
Theriaca became an actual substance and differed from the
Alexipharmica, which was more a method of treatment. This
division was afterwards adopted by all the subsequent early
writers on the subject, including Dioscorides, Galen, Aetius,
Paulus Aegineta, Avicenna and Rhazes.
From the first century theriaca was regarded as a very
important compound, and in the endeavour to secure the
most effective combination for the purpose, the most extra-
ordinary formulae containing a large number of ingredients,
were devised by various physicians. The general treatment
recommended by Nicander for the bites of all venomous
animals was sucking the wound, applying cupping vessels to
it, cauteries and leeches, and afterwards administering stimu-
lant medicines.
Respecting the sucking of a wound, he gives an important
injunction that the person who sucks the wound should not be
fasting, from which it may be gathered that he was aware of
the physiological fact that the vessels absorb more readily
when in an empty state.
Nicander's particular remedies were such drugs as birth-
wort, alkanet, and theriaca of vipers, which was prepared with
ANTIDOTES TO POISON IN ANCIENT TIMES 43
a great many aromatic roots and fruits, including ginger,
cinnamon, myrrh, iris and gentian. In his work he mentions
twenty-two poisonous substances including :
Aconite (wolf's bane), litharge (lead oxide), buprestis (a
beetle resembling caritharides) , ceruse (white lead), conium
(hemlock), cantharides, hyoscyamus (henbane), ixias (probably
a species of chameleon), coagulated milk, sea-hare, poppy
(opium), pharicum (probably a composition of agaric), the red
toad and marsh frog, the salamander, bull's blood, taxus
(yew), and toxicum (an unknown poison). As antidotes he
recommends warm oil, warm water and mallow or linseed
tea to excite vomiting.
From this list we have some idea of the knowledge of
poisons at that period. Most of the substances enumerated
are of vegetable or animal origin, few of the soluble mineral
poisons being known at that time.
Galen noticed that opium dissolved in a small quantity
of wine produced stronger effects than when given alone, and
that when a larger draught of wine was given, it proved an
antidote by counteracting the narcotic powers of the opium.
He stated that he once cured a person reduced to the last
stage of coma by the administration of strong wine.
Dioscorides also dealt very largely with this subject, and,
like Nicander directs that " the person who sucks the poisoned
wound be not fasting and that he shall keep some oil in his
mouth." The wound is then to be fomented with a sponge
and scarified or cut out, a method on which there is no improv-
ment at the present time. Cauterization with fire is another
method which Dioscorides recommends, and for the bite of a
venomous serpent known to be fatal, he advises immediate
amputation to save life.
According to Pliny and Galen, the formula for the first
theriaca against the bites of all venomous animals was in-
scribed in verse on a stone in the temple of Asklepios on the
island of Cos. It contained wild thyme, opoponax, aniseed,
fennel, parsley, meum and ammi. These were to be beaten
up with meal of fitches (ervum ervilla), passed through a sieve,
kneaded with wine, cut into lozenges of the weight of half a
denarius (30 grammes), one to be placed in three cyathi
(about five ounces) of wine and swallowed.
44 POISON MYSTERIES
The next theriaca in antiquity is that originated by Anti-
ochus the Third, King of Syria and Babylon, who flourished
about 223 B.C. He is said to have devised a compound that
was proof against the bites of all venomous animals and reptiles
except the asp.
One of the most celebrated of the theriaca was that of
Mithridates VI (120-63 B.C.), King of Pontus in Asia Minor.
From the constant apprehension of being poisoned by
his enemies, Mithridates is said to have rendered himself
immune from their effects by taking small doses of poisonous
substances daily in combination with the antidote he de-
vised, and thus believed himself poison-proof. For many
years he carried on warfare with the Romans, but was
finally defeated by Pompey, and, not wishing to fall into the
hands of his enemies, he put an end to his life. After the con-
quest Pompey is said to have captured the coveted formula
among the secret papers of the King.
This compound contained fifty-four ingredients, which
were prepared in the form of a conserve or electuary.
Needless to say this elaborate remedy would be quite
useless as an antidote to any poisonsous substance, but
judging from what Pliny tells us of some of the so-called
poisons known to Mithridates, such as " the blood of a duck
found in a certain district of Pontus " which was supposed to
live on poisonous food, it is no wonder he had a belief in its
efficacy. Curiously enough, Mithridates employed the duck's
blood as an ingredient in the later modifications of his theriaca,
and he tells us that he did so because he observed that " these
ducks fed on poisonous plants and suffered no harm."
Another theriaca is attributed to Zopyros, a Greek physician
of Alexandria, about 80 B.C. He named his formula " Ambro-
sia," and it contained frankincense, galbanum, pepper and
other aromatic substances, made into a conserve with boiled
honey. A piece the size of an Egyptian bean was directed to
be taken, washed down with a draught of wine.
Equally celebrated was the theriaca of Philon of Tarsus, who
is said to have lived in the early part of the first century and
recorded his formula in symbolic Greek verse. Galen mentions
that it had a great reputation for a long time and was one of
the most famous compounds of the kind. It contained such
ANTIDOTES TO POISON IN ANCIENT TIMES 45
curious substances as " the red hair of a lad whose blood had
been shed on the fields of Mercury," which was possibly
symbolic language for suffering, and certain drugs the
names of which are disguised in mystic language. The whole
of the mixture was to be made into a conserve with " ' the
work of the Daughters of the Bull of Athens " which is supposed
to mean Attic honey.
The Theriaca Philonium survived over 1,700 years and
has an interesting history. It passed into many of the
pharmacopoeias of Europe, remaining in the London Phar-
macopma until 1746, when it was composed of opium,
pepper, ginger, caraway, syrup, honey and wine. Until
1746 it was called " Philonium Romanum," but was then
changed to " Philonium Londonense," and syrup of poppies
was substituted for the honey. It is probable that this
mixture was originally intended as a remedy for a peculiar
form of colic which became epidemic in Rome when Philon
flourished there. Philon's formula formed the basis of what
was afterwards known as Confection of Opium and remained
in the London Pharmacopceia until 1867.
The Theriaca which eclipsed all others in fame and popularity
was that originated by Andromachus, physician to Nero
(A.D. 37-68). So much did the Emperor appreciate his
physician's efforts to devise a universal antidote that he
raised him to the dignity of Archiatrus. The Theriaca of
Andromachus was claimed to be an improvement on that
of Mithridates, until then the greatest antidote in Roman
pharmacy. He added vipers to the compound and called
his theriaca " Galene." Like other physicians of his time
Andromachus wrote his formula and described its virtues in
Greek verse, which he dedicated to Nero. He claimed that
it would " counteract all poisons and bites of venomous animals
and that it would also relieve all pain, weakness of the stomach,
asthma, difficulty of breathing, phthisis, colic, jaundice,
dropsy, weakness of sight, inflammation of the bladder and
kidneys, and plague." It was indeed a panacea for all com-
plaints.
Galen states that he tested this antidote by giving it to a
number of fowls to which he had first administered a poison.
Those to which the theriaca had been given survived, but all
46 POISON MYSTERIES
the others died. He says that it resisted poison and venomous
bites and cured a great many diseases. The original formula
contained no less than seventy-three ingredients, including
dried vipers. This remarkable preparation remained in
popular use throughout the Middle Ages and is still made
and sold in the drug bazaar of Constantinople and also in
some parts of Italy.
About the year a.d. 50 the Theriaca of Democrates became
famous. This was similar to the compound of Andromachus,
the formula for which Democrates, a Greek physician then
living in Rome, translated into verse. Other formulae were
originated by Nicolaus of Salerno, Amando, Arnauld and
Abano, each of whom added something to the original
formula. These preparations may be said to have reached
their zenith in the sixteenth century when Pietro Andrea
Matthiolus, the commentator of Dioscorides, published another
formula which contained no less than two hundred and
fifty separate substances, including dried vipers, pearls, red
coral and emeralds. This formula in a modified form was
included in the London Pharmacopoeia in 1618 and remained
an official remedy until 1746.
Several cities became celebrated for the manufacture of
Theriaca, including Cairo, Florence, Genoa, Bologna and
Venice. The Theriaca of Venice or Treacle, as it was called,
contained sixty-one ingredients, had a reputation throughout
Europe and was included in the London Pharmacopoeia down
to 1746. In Bologna the mixing of the Theriaca was carried
out with great ceremony in the courtyard of the ancient Archi-
ginnasio in the presence of the chief officials of the city. The
ingredients were mixed under the supervision of the medical
professors of the University to ensure of it being faithfully
and properly compounded. From the fourteenth to the
seventeenth century it was regarded as a remedy for plague
and was used in great quantities. Evelyn, in his Diary,
March 23, 1646, thus alludes to the Theriaca of Venice —
" Having packed up my purchases of books, pictures, casts,
treacle, etc. (the making and extraordinary ceremony whereof
I had been curious to observe, for it is extremely pompous
and worth seeing) I departed from Venice."
The great consumption of this medicament in the six-
ANTIDOTES TO POISON IN ANCIENT TIMES 47
teenth century is evidenced by Morgan, Apothecary to Queen
Elizabeth, who in a pamphlet insists that a product that he
had made had been compared with other " theriacle "
brought from Constantinople and Venice and had been com-
mended.
"It is very lamentable to consider," he writes " that
straungers doe dayly send into England a false and naughty
kinde of Mithridatium and Threacle in great barrelles more
than a thousand weight in a year, and vtter ye same at a lowe
price for 3^., and 4^. a pound, to ye great hurt of Her 'Majesties
subjects and no small gaine to .straungers purses."
In 1612, it is recorded that the Master and Wardens of the
Grocers' Company of London marked that " a filthy and un-
wholesome baggage composition was being brought into this
Realm as Tryacle of Genoa, made only of the rotten garble
and refuse outcast of all kinds of spices and drugs, hand over-
head with a little filthy molasses and tarre to worke it up
withal." This was communicated to the College of Physicians,
and they set about not only to devise their own formula, but
to superintend its manufacture, which was then entrusted to
William Besse, an apothecary in the Poultry. Besse was made
to take a " corporal oath " before the Lord Mayor, and every
year when he made the confection had to show the ingredients
and the product to the College of Physicians. His treacle
was sold at not above 2s. 8d. per lb. or 2d. per ounce.
The use, however, of this medicament in Great Britain
goes back to a much earlier period. It was recommended to
Alfred the Great by Helia, the Patriarch of Jerusalem, accord-
ing to an Anglo-Saxon MS. of the eleventh century. It is
again mentioned by Foucher de Chartres in 1124, who states it
was used in the first Crusade. It is recorded in a Close Roll
of King John in 1208, and a " triacle box du pere apelle une
Hakette garniz d'or " is mentioned amongst the precious
effects of Henry V.
Prosper Alpinus, the physician of Padua, who travelled in
Egypt in 1591, refers to the manufacture of Theriaca in Cairo
and states that it was only allowed to be made in public, and
that the ceremony was performed once a year in the Mosque
of Morestan by the chief apothecary of the city in the presence
of all the physicians. He states that at that time Italians,
48 POISON MYSTERIES
Germans, Poles, Flemings, Englishmen and Frenchmen came
to Cairo to purchase this true Theriaca.
Much more might be written describing the making of this
ancient and interesting medicament, which has a literature
of its own, but it will be sufficient to quote one more account
from the Regulations and Statutes of Montpellier, where the
compounding was also carried out with great ceremony.
According to a report by Laurens Catelan, Master Apothe-
cary in Ordinary to Monseigneur the Prince of Conde, it was
required that the preparation should be made in public in
the presence of the very illustrious professors of the famous
Faculty of Medicine so that they might have the opportunity
of censuring or approving the ingredients and that the public
might therefore be sure of the virtue of these important
medicines.
It may well be asked what was the rationale of admin-
istering these extraordinary compounds which survived for
centuries. All that can be said is, that these complex
mixtures of gums, balsams and aromatic substances would
probably have some antiseptic action on the alimentary
and internal organs. They were generally directed to be
given with wine which would aid this effect and, at any
rate, would have a reviving and stimulating effect on the
individual, but no real antidotal properties can be ascribed
to them.
The search for antidotes to poison was not confined
entirely to the Old World, for according to the Carolina
Gazette of May 9, 1750, the General Assembly, the Governing
Body of the Colony, authorized the publication of "Nig-
ger Caeser's cure for poison." The General Assembly had
purchased Nigger Caeser's freedom, who was apparently a
slave, and granted him £100 a year for life as the price of his
formula, which consisted of roots of plantain and wild hore-
hound, 3 oz. boiled together in 2 quarts of water down to
I quart and strained. Of this, one- third was to be given
every morning fasting for three consecutive mornings.
Certain dieting was also required, and it is stated that if in
the three days' treatment no benefit had resulted, it was a
sign that the patient had either not been poisoned at all or had
been by such poisons as Caeser's antidote would not remedy.
CHAPTER IV
PREVENTIVE METHODS AND SUBSTANCES USED
AGAINST POISONS
AMONG the famous medicaments of antiquity reputed to
be effective in counteracting poisons was " terra sigillata "
or " sealed earth," a peculiar clay which originally came from
the Isle of Lemnos. Its reputation dates from the time of
Herodotus, and it continues in use in Turkey and some parts
of the East to-day. This red clay was formerly excavated from
the side of a certain hill on August 6, with great ceremony, in
the presence of the principal inhabitants of the island. The
ceremony was originally associated with the worship of Diana
and was carried out on May 6, each year. This particular
earth was not allowed to be dug by anyone on any other day
of the year except that formally set apart for the operation.
According to Dioscorides, the clay was made into a paste
in his time with goats' blood, and the Greeks stamped or
sealed the earth with a representation of Diana, one of the
goddesses associated with healing, and this seal was regarded
as sacred. It had a universal reputation as an antidote to all
poisons, and a poisoned liquid drunk from a cup made from
the clay was believed to be harmless. The earth was so
called on account of the seal stamped upon it in proof of its
being genuine.
So great was the demand for the famous " terra sigillata "
of Lemnos from the thirteenth to the fifteenth century that
many other earths, for which similar properties were claimed,
were exploited and recommended in books on medicine of the
period. Thus a " terra sigillata " was made in Cilicia (Silesia),
also in several districts of Italy, in Malta and in Palestine.
In England a clay was found which was said to have the same
properties. It entered into the composition of many
important remedies, including the Theriaca of Andromachus,
49 D
50 POISON MYSTERIES
and was regarded generally as being an antidote against all
deadly poisons.
On analysis made some years ago "terra sigillata " was
found to consist of oxides of iron, aluminium, and mag-
nesia, with a proportion of silicates. The whole formed
an astringent and absorbent earth, its chief virtues probably
being, like many other ancient remedies, chiefly due to the
mystery surrounding its origin and the superstition connected
with its source.^
A curious account of how its value was once tested is
recorded in the following grant dated 1580, made by Prince
William, the Landgrave of Hesse, to Andreas Bertoldus of
Oschatz : —
Be it knowen unto all persons, that an honest man called
Bertold of Oschatz, came into the presence of the most noble
Prince and Lord, the Lord William Landgraue of Hesse Court
of Catzenelnbogen Ditz, Ziegenheim and Nidda etc., our
gracious Lord and prince, and in humble manner declared
unto him, that hee had found in an olde mine of Golde
within the dominion of Schneidnitz, a new kinde of earth,
which is a present help and a most notable remedie against
all manner of poysons and sundrie diseases, which earth
having a stampe upon it he offered to sell unto his Excellencie :
who not trusting the man upon his bare worde, committed
the matter to his Phisitions Maurice Thauern, and Laurence
Hyper : Commanding them to make a perfect tryall of the
saide earth, whereupon the saide Doctors in Phisicke to satisfie
their Prince, did make a double proffe of the deadliest poysons
that might be, which were. Mercuric Sublimate, Aconitum,
Nereum and Apocinum, and of some one of these they gave
halfe a dramme a peece to eight dogges, to four of them they
gave the earth, after the poyson, and to the other foure the
poyson alone : of these foure that tooke it alone, the first
that tooke Apocynum : dyed within halfe an houre, the
second that has taken Nereum died within foure houres :
the third that swallowed Mercuric, died within nine houres
after. And although they all did call up some part of the
poyson, yet after most cruell tormentes with crampes and
trembling they died : the fourth dogge that eat Aconitum,
^ Sec " Terra Sigillata, a famous Medicament of Ancient Times,"
C. J. S.Thompson, Proceedings lyth International Congress of Medicine,
London, 191 3.
PREVENTIVE METHODS AGAINST POISONS 51
systeyned thirteene great panges of the crampe, so as every
man thought hee woulde have died with his fellowes, yet
Hved he the first day, and having half of the dose of this
medicine given him, he thoroughly recovered. The other
foure dogges to whom the poysons before named with the
like quantities of this Terra Sigillata was given, for three
houres after the receiving of it, were very sicke and feeble,
especially one of them to whom the double quantitie of
Aconitum by neghgence was given, vomited thrise : the next
day they were all well and did eate their meate greedily, so as
there appeared scarse any token of poyson.
When thus his Highnesse had scene the experience of this
earth to bee so present a remedie against such deadly poysons,
and that the saide Andrew Bertold had humbly craved his
letters of credite, both in the favour of man and advance-
ment of the truth, that others might have knowledge, he
denied not to graunt them : But commanded that his letter,
testiriionial sealed with his Highnesse his privie scale, and sub-
scribed with the handes of the foresaid Doctors, in whose
presence this triall was made, should be given unto him.
Which we the above named Doctors upon our allegiance to
his Highnesse, and for the furtherance of the truth, because
we found it as hath beene declared to be true and unseyned,
most willingly have done. Given the XXVIII of July, the
yeare of our Lorde 1580.
Mauritius Thauer, D.
Laurencius Hyperius, M.D.
lOHAN KrUG.
Another document regarding a trial of the " terra sigillata "
is as follows : —
A copie of the Letters Pattents which the noble earle Wolf-
gan earle of Holenhoe, Lord of Langenburg, etc. Had
graunted to Andrewe Bertolde Oschatz, in witnes of the
wonderful vertues of the Terra Sigillata, found latly in Ger-
maine which hath been tried to be an approved medicine
against the strongest poysons, and sundrie other grieues :
faithfully translated out of the Germaine Originall.
We Wolfgangus, Earle of Holenhoe, Lorde of Langenburge
He. Do openile make known unto all men by these my Letters,
Testimoniall, that there came lately before me at Langenburge,
my well-beloved friende Andreas Bertoldus of Oschatz, and
declared unto mee that he had a most excellent kinde of Terra
52 POISON MYSTERIES
Sigillata, which was not al onely of great force against sundrie
diseases : but also a most undouted remedie against all
manner of venemous poisons, as had beene proved by sundrie
witnessess upon a great number of dogges, which made me
also desirous to see the triall of it. It happened at the same
time, that one called Wendel Thumblardt was by our Lieue-
tenant of Langenburg for certain felonies imprisoned, who
being examined by our Justices, confessed himselfe guilty
of a great number of robberies : And therefore brought to
the barre was condemned to bee hanged. Being yet detained
in prison, and coming to his eare that there was such a medi-
cine, so soueraigne against sundrie sicknessess, and the most
deadly poisons, he made humble request as well by his parents,
as by other his friends, of which there were present no small
number, desiring for the mercie of God, and respect of his
poore life, that being thus condemned, he might have given
unto him the most deadly poison that might be devised, where-
by a perfit triall might bee had of the worthiness of this
medicinable earth. And in this respect, not onely for this
pittiful request of his : but also for the commoditie and bene-
fite of all Christendome, (if so be the medicine proove answear-
able to the report) Pardoning the offender, wee graunted his
life on that condicion. Therefore the day of the date of these
present, and our welbeloved Cosin the Countie George Frider-
ick of Holenhoe, and the Lord of Langenburg, and in the
presence of all our Nobilitie and Commons, the said patient
received a dram and a halfe of Mercuric Sublimate, mingled
with Conserue of Roses, and immediately after it he drank a
dram of the Terra Sigillata in olde wine. And albeit the
poison did in the judgment of our learned Phisition George
Pistor Doctor of Phisicke, and John Lutzen our Apothecarie,
who were both by him all the while, extremely torment
and vexe him : yet in the end the medicine prevailing over-
came it, whereby the poore wretch was delivered, and being
restored to his health was commited to his parents. Whereas
therefore the foresaid Andrew Bertold, hath humbly required
to have our Letters Testimoniall for his farther credite, wee
have thought good for the furtherance and advancement of
the truth, to graunt him these our Letters, signed with our
scale Manuell. Given at Langenburg the 25th of Januarie,
in the yeare of our Lord, 1581.
Petrus Oponus or Petri de Abano (1250-1303), so called from
his birthplace, Abano, wrote a work entitled " De Remediis
PREVENTIVE METHODS AGAINST POISONS 53
Venenorum " in the thirteenth century in which he gives the
following poisons known in his time, many of which, however,
are innocuous. He mentions mercury, gypsum, copper, iron
rust, magnetite (magnetic stone), lapis lazuli, arsenic sub-
limate, litharge, lead, realgar, cateputia juice, cucumber
juice, usnea, coriander juice, mandragora, poppy, opium,
scammony, aconite, oleander juice, hellebore juice, mezereon
juice, fool's-parsley, briony, nux vomica, colocynth, laurel
berries, poppy, cicuta, serpentary and cantharides.
Certain charms were believed to act as antidotes to poison
and the two following quotations are taken from a MS. by
Petrus Hispanus (Pope John XXI) in the fourteenth
century : —
CONTRA VENENUM
Scribe nota nostra i lamina loctonus ut ali6 quoque
comodo et lana et dari biber et abent scribi
cum moro ut cumque nio alio nota sit nota et sine
scripta 7 lineis past."
" Zaare. Zaare Zaam, Zaare
Zaare ssleqer Bohorum, nabarayn
Uessally — uessredaza — asseyan — Haurahe
reamue — ayn latinume queue :
draytery, nuyyeri, quibari, yeh ay
hahanny ymkatrum hanitanery vnerym
caruhe tahuene cehue beyne
et Lana cuz aqua . . . dame bibere."
j\
^
The so-called Toadstone has from early times been reputed
to possess the property of counteracting the effect of poisons.
These stones were believed to be found in the heads of old
toads which, when caught, were placed on a red cloth
and the stone recovered through the mouth. Pomet, who
wrote in the seventeenth century, threw doubt on this source
of origin and states that " toad stones are found in the moun-
tains or plains, although he would not dispute that they might
have been bred in the heads of old toads." He describes two
kinds, " the round and the long : the former being of a
deep grey inclining to blue ; the long being redder grey
with reddish spots. It is false that they change colour and
54 POISON MYSTERIES
sweat when they approach the cup wherein there is poison."
Lemery, a French writer of the same period, in describing
these stones, states, that when appHed to the sting or bite of
venomous beasts, they draw out the poison. They were
usually set and worn as rings and regarded as of great value.
They were generally mounted so that the back of the stone
could touch the skin, and were said to notify the presence
of poison by producing a sensation of heat in the finger at
the point of contact.
A toadstone ring is described by Jones, which he attributes
to the fossil palatal tooth of a species of Ray that is believed
to be a specific in cases of kidney disease when immersed in
water and drunk by the patient. In the inventory of the Due
de Berry mention is made of a toadstone in a ring of gold, and
similar rings are alluded to in the records of the Duke of
Burgundy.
Fenton, writing in 1569, says, " Toadstones being used in
rings, give forewarning of venom"; and in Ben Jonson's
" Fox " they are referred to as follows : —
" Were you enamoured on his copper rings.
His saffron jewel, with the toadstone in't ? "
Lupton, in his Thousand Notable Things, goes as far as to
give a method of obtaining the stone from the toad :
" Put a great or overgrown toad (first bruised in divers
places) into an earthen pot ; put the same into an ants' hil-
lock, and cover the same with earth, which toad at length the
ants will eat, so that the bones of the toad and stone will be
left in the pot."
Another writer, however, states that the stone should be
obtained while the toad is living, and this may be done by
simply placing him upon a piece of scarlet cloth, " where-
withal they are much delighted, so that, while they stretch
out themselves as it were in sport upon that cloth, they cast
out the stone of their head, but instantly they sup it up again,
unless it be taken from them through some secret hole in the
same cloth."
The scarlet cloth, however, did not always perform this
miracle, for Boetius relates how he watched a whole night an
PREVENTIVE METHODS AGAINST POISONS 55
old toad he had laid on a red cloth to sec him cast forth
the stone, but the toad was stubborn, and left him nothing
to gratify the great pangs of his whole night's restlessness.
In the Wellcome Historical Medical Museum there is a
toadstone mounted as a ring in bronze gilt of the seventeenth
century ; and the Londesborough Collection included a
specimen described as being of metal gilt, having upon it the
figure of a toad swallowing a serpent Another set with a large
greyish-brown stone mounted in silver bears an inscription
on the inside of the ring, " God cureth me."
The so-called horn of the unicorn, which was in reality the
tusk of the narwhal, has been associated with mysterious
properties since the time of Aristotle, Pliny and other ancient
writers. Ctesias (about 390 B.C.) was the first to record the
wonderful properties attributed to it. " Drinking vessels,"
he says, " were made of the horn and those who used them
were protected against poisons, convulsions and epilepsy,
provided that, just before or just after taking poison, they
drank wine or water from the cup made from it. Other
writers declared that poisoned wounds could be cured by
merely holding the horn of the unicorn close to the
wound.
These horns were considered of great value and in the
Middle Ages are said to have been worth about ten times the
price of gold. In 1553 a unicorn's horn was brought to the
King of France which was valued at ,^20,000 sterling, and one
presented to Charles I, supposed to be the largest then known,
measured seven feet long and weighed 13 lb.
Edward IV gave to the Duke of Biu-gundy a gold cup set
with jewels, with a piece of unicorn's horn worked into the
metal ; and one large horn in the possession of the City of
Dresden was valued at 75,000 thalers. A piece was occasion-
ally sawn off to be used for medicinal purposes, and it was a
city regulation that two persons of princely rank should be
present whenever this operation was performed.
In the sixteenth century these horns were so rare that Dr.
Racq, a physician of Florence, recorded that a German mer-
chant sold one of them to the Pope for 4.000 livres. Ambroise
Pare wrote a treatise on the unicorn's horn and its remedial
properties, and Thomas Bartholinus^ published a work on
56 POISON MYSTERIES
" Observations on the Unicorn Horn " in 1678, dealing with
its medical uses only.
Although it was considered of such great value, the horn
was utilized for making goblets mounted in gold, and walking
sticks, to which were ascribed remarkable virtues, the greatest
of which, according to writers on natural history of the time,
was its " resistance to all manner of poysons."
Before the seventeenth century the genuine unicorn's horn
was supposed to be black or dark in colour, and Boetius de
Boodt records that he saw a horn in Venice at the close of the
sixteenth century which was said to be a genuine unicorn
horn, but he believed it to be that of a gazelle. However,
in the seventeenth century it came to be universally, agreed
that the genuine so-called unicorn's horns were long, and of
an ivory-like colour, tapering towards the tip with curling
staves. Several of these horns are still kept among the
treasures in churches and monasteries in Europe. One
of the more famous and frequently mentioned is the
horn that was preserved in the Monastery of St. Denis,
near Paris. Cardanus, who described it in the sixteenth
century, added that he saw it when he visited the
monastery while on a journey in France. He states " it was
so long that he could not reach the tip when he placed it
at his side ; it was not particularly thick, becoming gradually
thinner towards the tip and curling like a snail's shell. The
colour was that of a hartshorn."
This horn was greatly venerated and was included in the
inventory of treasures consisting of gold and precious stones
and holy relics of the monastery. Two unicorn's horns were
preserved at St. Mark's in Venice, and in the sixteenth century
were exhibited to the people once a year on Ascension Day,
together with the other treasures of the Duomo.
There is frequent mention in records of ducal cups of
unicorn's horn which were used as drinking vessels by those
whose lives were sought by poisoners. The effect of the
poison was believed to be neutralized on coming into contact
with the horn. A cup of this kind is preserved at Rosenberg
which dates from the early part of the seventeenth century.
Gesner states that the rich put a piece of horn in their cups
to protect themselves and to cure themselves, " but it must be
PREVENTIVE METHODS AGAINST POISONS 57
a fresh piece and not one the properties of which have been
exhausted by often being placed in drinks. It loses its virtue
like plants do."
Pomet, writing in the seventeenth century, says : " We
ought to undeceive those who believe what we now call the
unicorn's horn was the horn of a land animal whereof mention
was made in the Old Testament, since it is nothing but the
horn of the Narwhal and, as to the choice of it, ought to be the
whitest, largest and finest."
It is recorded in 1650 that a certain well in Venice was
remarkable for its fresh water on account of two pieces of
unicorn's horn being concealed at the bottom.
In all probability horns were used in early times as drinking
vessels, not only on account of their suitability in shape, but
also with the idea that they could impart their supposed
health-giving properties to the liquid placed in them.
In Denmark, in the seventeenth century, unicorn's horn
was sold in the apothecaries' shops and was much esteemed
by Danish physicians on account of its medicinal properties.
In 1593 there is a record that some physicians in Vienna
in order to prove the efficacy of unicorn's horn as an
antidote to poisons, experimented on a dog who was first
given a dose of arsenic followed by one of unicorn's
horn, and the dog subsequently recovered, while dogs to
which arsenic had been given alone died from the effects.
Similar tests were said to have been carried out in Copenhagen
in 1636, as the result of which it was recorded that " unicorn's
horn is an antidote against poisons, just as those seen at Paris
and elsewhere."
On October 31 of that year, Drs. Fincke, Worm and Scheele
met in the house of an apothecary called Johannes Woldenberg
in Copenhagen and undertook the following experiment.
Two pigeons and two cats were dosed with arsenic and cor-
rosive sublimate. Unfortunately for the experiment, the pigeon
which received both the poison and the antidote of unicorn's
horn, vomited the latter and died some hours afterwards.
The cat which was given sublimate but no antidote, is said to
have died after a short interval, while the cat which in addition
to the poison was given a small dose of imicom's horn lived
until the middle of the night. These and similar attempts
58 POISON MYSTERIES
to prove the value of the horn were made in Europe during
the seventeenth century. It was said to be efficacious in
plague and fever because they had certain symptoms in
common with those produced by poisons and were called
"poisonous diseases."
The Coronation Chair of the royal house of Denmark in the
seventeenth century was partly composed of unicorn's horns,
which are said to have been used on account of their great
value, and as being more precious than gold. The making of
this curious chair was commenced by Frederick III, " the
columns supporting it being composed of narwhal's teeth
and the chair covered with the horn wherever possible,
the same being used for the supports for the arms." In the
time of Frederick III and Christian V this chair was con-
sidered one of the most wonderful and valuable objects in
the kingdom, and was celebrated both in history and story.
On June 7, 1671, Christian V in magnificent robes was crowned
in it, and the feet of the throne were guarded by two silver
lions. The bishop who crowned the king in the Castle of
Fredericksborg in his address said, " Of mighty King Solomon,
history bears witness that he built a throne of ivory and
covered it with the finest gold ; Your Majesty is also sitting
on a costly throne which in the glory of its material and shape
is like unto King Solomon's throne, and the like thereof
cannot be found in any kingdom."
From a time of great antiquity, the horn of the Indian
rhinoceros has been reputed to possess the power of absorbing
poisonous substances brought into contact with it.
The Chinese fashioned these horns, which they still
value very highly, into cups which are sometimes orna-
mented with beautiful carving. The tradition in China
concerning the horn was, not so much that it acted as
an antidote to poison, but that it gave a sure indication
when any liquid placed in it contained some poisonous
substance. When a poisoned liquid was allowed to stand in
the horn the latter was said to sweat and change colour.
It is not therefore to be wondered at that the great emperors
of the East, whose lives were frequently attempted by poison,
chose these horns as drinking cups.
Rudolf II of Germany (1575-1612) fashioned a cup of
i
m
1^
i '"^^^Jr
DRINKING CUP OF UNICORN S HORN
(xvii century).
[Copyright to the Wellcome Historical Medical Museum.
ASSAY CUPS OF RHINOCEROS HORN USED TO DETECT POISON
IN WINE (XVITH CENTURY).
PREVENTIVE METHODS AGAINST POISONS 59
rhinoceros horn for his own use, which is now preserved in the
National Museum at Copenhagen. Several other vessels of
rhinoceros horn are mentioned in Danish records, one being
described as " a little flat dish of rhinoceros horn with a gilt
foot and then gilded, with an Indian underneath."
Lemery says : " The horn and nails of the animal are both
used in medicine and contain in them a good deal of volatile
salt and oil which are useful to resist poison."
Pomet declares that " the horn is highly alkalescent and
is also good against malignant fevers and destroys malignant
acids which stir up the most pernicious diseases."
There have been certain periods in the world's history when
every eminent personage, king, prince, minister or favourite,
was deemed in danger of poison, and when not a pa.rticle of
food was swallowed by them until it had been first tasted.
The traditions attached to the horn of the rhinoceros must
have come to Europe at an early period, as we find that cups
made from the horn, called " assay cups " were used in England
as early as the fifteenth century in the time of Edward V.
The earliest allusion to the assay cups, which were made
both from the horn of the rhinoceros and the unicorn, is in
Russell's Book of Nurture, 1480, in which it is stated : —
" Credence and tastynge is used
for drede of poysenynge
to all officers ysworne and grete
othe by chargynge."
It was customary for the esquire in attendance on a dis-
tinguished person to first test the wine by drinking some
from his assay cup. Hall, in his Chronicle (1550), refers to
this custom as follows : —
" The esquier whiche was accustomed to sewe and take
the assaye before kyng- Ry chard."
" The Maior of London claymed to serue the quene with a
cuppe of golde and a cuppe of assay of the same."
Gutch in 1530 alludes to
" Two little Cuppis of asseye silvar and gilt."
An assay cup of rhinoceros horn with a silver rim about
6o POISON MYSTERIES
i|- in. deep, with a bishop's mitre and the initials T.T. crudely
engraved upon it, is in the Wellcome Historical Medical
Museum with other specimens of the kind. It is believed
to date from the middle of the sixteenth century.
On account of its association with medicine, the rhinoceros
was adopted as the crest of the Apothecaries' Society of
London when it was founded in 1617.
The Chinese, who appear to have ever been suspicious of
being poisoned, also made little cups of glass about ij in.
high which they believed would crack if a poisoned liquid
were poured into them.
There is an early tradition in India connected with bowls
of pottery with a light greenish glaze, called Gherian ware.
They are supposed to break into pieces if touched by
poisoned food or liquid, and are said to have been intro-
duced into Northern India by Mohamed Ghori in the twelfth
century from whom they take their name.
Another substance which was regarded with great vener-
ation as an antidote to poisons, especially in the East, was the
bezoar stone, a calculus found in the intestines of Persian
wild goats, cows, a species of ape and other animals. These
stones vary much in size from that of a small egg down to a
hazelnut, and are of a yellowish brown colour.
Pomet says, " If you would have the finest and best oriental
bezoar, you must choose that which is shining, of a pleasant
scent, tending to that of ambergris. The shape is of no
consequence, whether round, smooth or rough, and whether
white, yellow or grey, but the principal colour is usually an
olive."
It was introduced into Eastern medicine by the Arabs, but
its reputation is of much greater antiquity. The name is
said to be of Persian origin and derived from the word
" pad-zahr," " an expeller of poisons/' and is mentioned first
by Avenzoar, an Arab physician of Seville, about the year
A.D. 1140.
It was known to the Hebrews in ancient times as "Bel Zaard"
which means the "Master," or ''every cure for poisons."
There are several varieties of these stones, the most esteemed
being the Oriental, which come from Persia. On dividing the
calculus, it appears to have been formed by a deposit of calcium
Oriental Bozoar.
Orion tal Bezoar.
[Copyright.
Occidental Bezoar.
BEZOAR STONES.
PREVENTIVE METHODS AGAINST POISONS 6i
phosphate round some nucleus, such as hair or the stone of a
fruit. One that is still preserved in the Museum of St. Bartho-
lomew's Hospital has a date stone as the nucleus. It was
believed that the special virtues of the stone were due to some
unknown plant on which the animal had fed.
The Occidental, another variety of bezoar stone, is said to
be obtained from the llamas of Peru, and a European variety
is got from the chamois of the Swiss mountains, but these
varieties never commanded the great value as did those from
the Orient, which are said by early writers to have been sold
for ten times their weight in gold. The Occidental bezoar
stone is usually much larger than the Oriental and has a
dull surface.
Lemery mentions a bezoar stone obtained from the hog,
which is of a whitish colour inclining to green. It is said to be
produced in the gall of certain swine in India and is very
highly esteemed by the natives.
All varieties of bezoar had a reputation for counteracting the
effects of poison. They were generally preserved in elaborate
cases of piefced gold with a chain attached so that they could
be suspended in the wine or liquid before it was drunk. " The
Portuguese above all nations," says a writer of the seven-
teenth century, "drive a great trade with bezoar, because
they are always on their guard and watching one another for
fear of poison."
As well as an antidote to poison, the bezoar came to be
regarded as a valuable remedy for fevers and was also applied
externally in skin diseases. It was given internally in doses of
4 to i6 grains and, in Portugal, in time of plague, the stones
were loaned to sufferers at about the equivalent of los. a day.
Three bezoar stones were sent by the Shah of Persia, as a
royal gift, to the Emperor Napoleon a little over a century
ago.
Ambroise Pare, when surgeon to Charles IX of France, relates
that one day, when the king was at Clermont, a Spanish noble-
man brought him a bezoar stone which he assured him was an
antidote to all poisons. The king sent for Pare and asked
him if he knew any substance which would annul the effects
of any poison. Pare said that could not be, for there were
many sorts of poisons which acted in very different ways.
62 POISON MYSTERIES
The Spanish nobleman, however, maintained that this stone
was a universal antidote and as the king was eager to test
the question, the Provost of the Palace was sent for and asked
if he had any criminal in his charge condemned to death. He
replied that he had a cook who had stolen two silver dishes,
who was'to be hanged the next day. The offer was there-
upon made to the cook that he should take a poison and the
alleged antidote immediately afterwards, and if he escaped
with his life he should go free. The cook gladly consented, and
an apothecary was ordered to prepare a deadly draught and
administer it, to be followed by a dose of the bezoar. This was
done. The poor wretch lived for about seven hours in terrible
agony which Pare tried in vain to relieve. After his death
Pare made an autopsy which showed that the antidote had
no effect at all. It was sublimate which had been given.
"And," the writer concludes, "the king commanded that
the stone should be thrown into the fire ; which was done."
A stone called Draconites, described by Albertus Magnus
( 1 193-1280) as a shining black stone of pyramidal shape,
was also believed to be antidote to all kinds of poisons.
A cup or goblet made of electrum, an alloy composed of
gold and silver known to the ancients, according to Pliny,
had the property of revealing any poisonous liquid which
was placed in it, by exhibiting certain circles like rainbows
in the liquid, which it also kept sparkling and hissing as if
on fire.
CHAPTER V
SUPERSTITIONS CONNECTED WITH POISONOUS
PLANTS
MANY strange superstitions are associated with certain
poisonous plants which have been handed down to
us from past ages. The mysterious properties, especially
of those which caused sleep or by supposed magical powers
concealed in them produced delirium, were attributed by the
ancients to a spirit or demon which dwelt in the roots of
the plants, and various rites and ceremonies were connected
with their gathering. The real cause of their physiological
effect oti the body was of course unknown, but the narcotic
effects which from experience were found to produce insen-
sibility, dreams, and frenzy made a deep impression on the
mind.
The hallucinations of the witches which we read about in
the Middle Ages, may be compared with those of the medicine-
men of many savage tribes to-day. In all probability they
were not entirely fictitious, but these effects were produced
by the taking of various drugs which had the effect of caus-
ing hallucinations and temporary insanity. Weak-minded
women, who probably formed the greater part of the class
known as witches, made use of an unguent with which they
anointed themselves in preparation for the so-called "witches'
Sabbath." Johannes Wierius, who was a witness of such a
gathering, recorded in 1566 the composition of the witches' oint-
ment and states it contained such powerful narcotic poisons as
mandrake, belladonna, henbane and stramonium. The ab-
sorption of this unguent was followed by unconsciousness and
sleep, and on being awakened the person so anointed was
fully assured that she had visited the " Sabbath."
The frenzies into which the sorcerers of the Middle Ages
63
64 POISON MYSTERIES
worked themselves may also no doubt be attributed to the
action of various substances with similar properties.
There is probably no plant around which clusters more
legendary lore and tradition than the mandrake [Atropa
mandragora) . Sufficient has been recorded about it to fill
volumes, and between the years 1510 and 1850 no less than
twenty-two treatises are known to have been written on the
subject.
It was known to the Babylonians over 3,000 years ago, and
their women carried a mandrake root as a charm against
sterility. The ancient Egyptians called it " The Phallus of
the Field " and held it in the highest esteem. The Greeks
surrounded it with strange traditions, and in Eastern Europe,
Arabia, Palestine and Syria, it has been associated with
mysterious rites and customs from time immemorial.
Theophrastus (300 B.C.) the earliest writer on botany,
alludes to the mandrake and records its property of inducing
sleep and its use in the composition of love philtres. Demos-
thenes, the Athenian orator, is stated to have compared his
lethargic hearers to those who had eaten it. The early Greeks
bestowed on it the name of Circeium, derived from the name
of the witch Circe, as they believed that an evil spirit dwelt
in the root. Pliny, in alluding to the mandrake, states that
"he who would undertake the office of uprooting it should
stand with his back to the wind, and before he begins to dig
make three circles round the plant with the point of a sword,
and then turning to the west proceed to dig it up." In other
countries the gathering of the root was believed to be attended
with great danger to the individual who was sufficiently daring
to pull it from the ground.
The Greeks believed that when dragged from the earth
the root gave a dreadful shriek and struck dead the person
who had the presumption to pull it up. They therefore
adopted the following ingenious method of obtaining it. A
dog was allowed to fast, and was then brought near the plant
round which was fastened a cord, the end of which was tied to
the tail of the dog. The gatherer would then place some food
within a few feet of the hungry animal, who in his struggles
to reach it would uproot the plant and be killed by the evil
spirit in consequence. At the moment of uprooting the
SUPERSTITIONS AND POISONOUS PLANTS 65
gatherer generally sounded a horn, which was supposed
to drown the shriek of the demon that dwelt in the
plant.
It is believed by some, that the mandrake is the plant
alluded to in the Book of Genesis, which was called by the
ancient Hebrews " Dudaim," and is stated to have been found
by Reuben, who carried it to his mother. The inducement
which tempted Leah to part with it proves the value set upon
the plant at this time. Maundrell found it used in the neigh-
bourhood of Aleppo as described in the Bible and states that
the Arabs call it " tuphac el sheitan." The Greeks sometimes
alluded to Venus as Mandragoritis and the fruit of the plant
was popularly termed " place of love." Pythagoras calls the
mandrake " Anthropomorphum," and Columella terms it
"semihomo."
Dioscorides refers to it in the first century, and mentions
that it is used for love charms and philtres. In the earliest
MS. of his work, written in the fifth century, and which is still
preserved in Vienna, there is a drawing in colour depicting
Euresis, the goddess of discovery, presenting the author with a
mandrake root. The root is in human form with five leaves
growing out of the head, and near by on the ground is a dog
in the agonies of death.
Josephus records the custom in a Jewish village of
pulling up the root by means of the dog, which was killed
by the shriek from the demon which resided in it. This
tradition appears to have been attached to the gather-
ing of the mandrake in nearly every country where it was
grown.
Many of the traditions and superstitions connected with
the plant appear to have arisen from the curious natural
shape of the root, which often bears a strong resemblance
to the human form. This similitude was turned to ac-
count by those who dealt in the plant, as they found they
obtained a greater value after manipulating it to make the
features and limbs more perfectly resemble a man or a
woman.
Beyond the effects attributed to it by tradition, the
mandrake has undoubted powerful narcotic properties. Its
active principle, discovered by Ahrens, is called mandra-
E
66 POISON MYSTERIES
gorine, and is said to be a mixture of bases of wliich
hyoscyamine is the chief, mixed with scopolamine. The
ancients attributed powerful aphrodisiacal virtues to the
root and claimed that it could produce a condition of
sexual excitement which was often attributed to natural and
magical powers, and for this reason included it in the com-
position of their love philtres. It was among the more
important narcotic drugs employed by the ancients for pro-
ducing anaesthesia, and Dioscorides gives the formula for a
wine made by infusing the root in Cyprus wine, which was
directed to be administered before amputation of a limb or
before the application of hot cautery.
Pliny remarks that mandrake " is taken against serpents
and before cutting and puncture, lest they be felt. Sometimes
the smell is sufficient, " and Apuleius, writing in the second
century, claims that half an ounce with wine is sufficient
to make a person insensible, even to the pain of amputa-
tion.
Lyman believes it was mandragora wine mixed with myrrh
that was offered to Christ on the Cross, as it was commonly
given to those who suffered death by crucifixion to allay in
some degree their terrible agonies.
In Shakespeare's time the mandrake still kept its place in
estimation as a narcotic. Thus we have Cleopatra asking for
the drug that she may " sleep out this great gap of time,"
while her Antony is away, and lago, whilst the poison begins
to work in the mind of Othello, exclaims
" Not poppy, nor mandragora
Nor all the drowsy syrups of this world
Shall ever medicine thee to that sweet sleep "
In the sixteenth century the Germans called these human-
like roots Abrunes or Alraun, considering them very valuable
and treating them with the greatest veneration. After
fashioning them as near as possible to the form of a man
or woman, they dressed them every day and consulted them
as oracles. They were introduced into England in
the time of Henry VIII, and met with ready purchasers.
To increase their value and importance, the roots were said
by the vendors to be produced from the flesh of criminals
SUPERSTITIONS AND POISONOUS PLANTS 67
which fell from the gibbet, and that they only grew beneath
the gallows : —
Lord Bacon notices their use in the following words : —
" Some plants there are, but rare, that have a morsie or
downie root and likewise that have a number of threads like
beards, as mandrakes, whereof witches and impostours make
an ugly image, giving it the form of a face at the top of the
root, and these strings to make a broad beard down, to the
foot."
Madame de Genlis states that " the mandrake roots should
be wrapped in a sheet, for that then they will bring increasing
good luck."
The plant is still used medicinally in China, where it is said
to be largely used by the Mandarins, who believe it will give
them increased intellectual powers and prolong their lives.
The origin of Alraun, the German name for the mandrake
root, has been variously explained. Tacitus speaks of a
formidable people among the Germans called Aurinia, believed
to be endowed with magical powers, and " some attribute
Allrun to their name on account of their use of the plant in
sorcery. They are the same of whom Aventinus speaks as
loose-haired, bare-legged witches who would slay a man,
drink his blood from his skull and divine the future from his
mangled remains." There is some reason to believe, how-
ever, that the word is simply a later form of the Gothic
Allrune, and that it is related to rune. The French word
Mandragloire is simply a part of the Greek word Mandragora,
blended with the name of the old French fairy Magloire. In
Germany and France the superstition took the following form.
The mandrake was said to spring up where the presence
of a criminal had polluted the ground. It was sure to be
found near a gallows, and so was popularly called in Germany
Galgemannlein. It was to be obtained generally in the way
described by Josephus, but, it was added, one must sign the
cross three times over the plant before pulling it up. Having
got the root it must be bathed every Friday, kept in a white
cloth in a box and then it would procure manifold benefits.
There is a letter still preserved from a burgess of Leipzig to
his brother at Riga written in 1675, which shows the popular
68 POISON MYSTERIES
notion of the mandrake at that time and its varioas names.
It reads : —
" Brotherly love and truth and all good wishes to thee
dear brother. I have thy letter and have made out from it
enough to understand that thou dear brother in thy home
affairs hast suffered great sorrow ; that thy children, cows,
swine, sheep and horses, have all died ; thy wine and beer
soured in thy cellar, and thy provender destroyed and that
thou dWellest with thy wife in great contention ; which is
all grievous to hear. I have therefore gone to those who
understand such things to find what is needed and have
asked them why thou art so unlucky. They have told me
that these evils proceed not from God but from wicked people ;
and they know what will help thee. If thou hast a Mandrake
(Allruniken oder Erdmannikin) and bring it into thy house,
thou shalt have good fortune. So I have taken the pains for
thy sake to go to those who have such things and to our exe-
cutioner have paid 64 thalers and a piece of gold drinkgelt
to his servant, and this (Mandrake) dear brother I send thee,
and thou must keep it as I shall tell in this letter. When thou
hast the Erdman in thy house let it rest three days without
approaching it ; then place it in warm water. With the
water afterwards sprinkle the animals and sills of the house
going all over, and soon it shall go better with thee and thou
shalt come to thy own if thou serve Erdmannikin right.
Bathe it four times every year and as often wrap it in silk
cloth and lay it among thy best things and thou need do no
more. The Bath in which it has been bathed is especially
good. If a woman is in child pain and cannot bear, if she
drinks a spoonful she will be delivered with joy and thankful-
ness. And when thou goest to law put Erdman under thy
right arm and thou shalt succeed whether right or wrong.
Now dear brother this Erdmannikin I send with all love and
faith to thee for a happy new year. Let it be kept and it may
do the same for thy childrens children. God keep thee —
Leipzig, Sunday before fastnight, 75 Hans, N."
It is certainly remarkable that in 1675 so much as seventy-
five thalers could be obtained for one of these little figures, but
is probable that the dealing in them had become very secret
on account of the danger incurred of being suspected of
witchcraft. In 1630 three women were executed in Hamburg
on this account. Matthiolus, in his commentary on DioL-
SUPERSTITIONS AND POISONOUS PLANTS 69
corides, describes the great ingenuity which had been reached
in the carving of the root into the human semblance and the
training of little shoots from seeds planted in it which were
manipulated so as to look like hair The same ingenuity was
employed to invest each figure with a marvellous legend of
its origin or potency.
A haunted spot is shown in Lower Wiirtemberg where a
merchant of Ulm tried vainly to get rid of his Galgemannlein,
and for a long time a house stood in Frankfort which was
avoided because it was related, that there a baker woman
had perished horribly with a mandrake in her possession,
which she had long tried to be rid of.
This diabolical phase of the superstition was especially
strong in France and England. It was believed by many
that Joan of Arc had one of the mandrake figures in her
possession, and she was even asked by the jud^e at her
trial whether this was not the case ; but she disclaimed any
knowledge of the mandrake. At Romorantin, Margaret
Ragum Bouchery, the wife of a Moor, was hanged as a witch
in 1603, the charge against her being that she kept and fed
daily a living mandrake fiend which was stated to be in
the form of a female ape.
Superstitions concerning the mandrake were strong through-
out the South of England, the belief being that it had a human
heart at its root. It was believed that in some places it
was perpetually watched over by Satan, and if pulled up at
certain holy times and with certain invocations, the Evil Spirit
would appear to do the bidding of the practitioner. In the
mining regions of Germany the mandrake was supposed to
reach down to the cobolds beneath the earth, and shrieked
when it was torn up. In Silesia, Thuringia, the Tyrol and
Bohemia, it is still connected with the idea of subterranean
treasures, and in the Hartz, mandrake decoction is poured
on animals to prevent swellings.
In 1429 the use of mandrakes as amulets was so general in
France that Friar Richard furiously denounced them and
vast numbers were burned. La Fontaine's fable " La Man-
dragore," copied from Machiavel's comedy of the same title,
turns upon the supposed potency of the plant to produce
children. Xhe Tyrolese believe that it not only reveals
70 POISON MYSTERIES
treasures, but prevents wicked possessions, and renders the
possessor proof against blows. In the Alpine regions it is
laid on the bed to prevent nightmare, and carried to secure
the mountaineer against robbers and bad weather.
The mandrake is called in Iceland thjofarot (thieves' root)
and is believed to spring from the froth of the mouth of one
who has been hanged or the cairn where he has been
buried.
In Kent the mandrake may be occasionally found kept
by women to prevent sterility, and the superstition still sur-
vives in Greece, where pieces of the root are worn by young
people as love charms. Mandrake roots are also carried
in Syria and Turkey by women against sterility and are sold
to-day in the bazaars of Constantinople.
Of the poisonous plants known to the ancients, aconite
may rightly be claimed to be one of the most important. It
has been called the " Queen Mother of Poisons " and has been
a matter of comment and note by early historians for over
two thousand years. Species of the plant were known as wolf's
bane, leopard's bane, and women's bane. IttTroot was com-
pared by some of the ancient botanists to sea crabfish, by others
to a scorpion ; "for," says one writer, "the root doth turn
and crook inward in manner of a scorpion's taile." Various
origins are given to the name aconite ; some attribute it to
the fact that it grows quite naturally upon bare and naked
rocks, which the Greeks call Aconas. Theophrastus says the
name is derived from Aconae, " a certain towne, neer to
which it groweth abundantly." It is also said to have been
derived from the Greek word for javelin or arrow, because
" some barbarous nations employed the juice to poison
their arrows and spears."
In ancient times apparently quite a number of poisonous
plants were described under the name of aconite, as well as
the Aconitum napellus, the species now employed in medi-
cine. Its deadly effects are alluded to by Ovid, Virgil and
Juvenal. Plutarch, in referring to the death of Orodes, says :
"He fell into a disease that became a dropsie after he had
lost his son Pacorus who was slain in a battle by the Romans.
Phraates, his second son, thinking to set his father forwards
gave him a drink of the juice of Aconitum. The dropsie
SUPERSTITIONS AND POISONOUS PLANTS 71
received the poison and the one drave the other out of
Orodes' body and set him on foot again."
Hanbury says the ancients were well aware of the poisonous
properties of aconite, though the various species were not
more exactly distinguished until the close of the Middle Ages.
It was used by the Chinese in ancient times and is still employed
by the less civilized of the hill tribes of India as an arrow
poison. It is said also to have been used for the same purpose
by the aborigines of ancient Gaul, It is mentioned in the
well-known ancient Welsh MS. of " The Physicians of Mydd-
vai," written in the thirteenth century, as "one of the plants
that every physician is to grow."
Matthiolus, in his commentary on the Materia Medica
of Dioscorides, relates the results of certain experiments
carried out by order of Pope Clement VII, on the persons
of two criminals condemned to death, for the purpose of
testing the value of an antidote to aconite, which he
describes as the most deadly of all known poisons. One of
the criminals was used as a test and the other for control
experiment.
The root, which contains the largest proportion of the active
principle called aconitine, has often caused fatal results in
being mistaken for that of horse-radish. It had rarely been
used for criminal purposes until Lamson in 1881 employed
the alkaloid to take the life of Percy Malcolm John. In
connection with aconitine it is related that Christison, the
famous toxicologist, who was professor of Medical Juris-
prudence at the University of Edinburgh, when giving evidence
in a certain case as to the recognition of poisonous substances
sought for in the body after death, said to the judge, " My
Lord, there is but one deadly agent of this kind which we
cannot satisfactorily trace in the human body after death,
and that is — " when the Judge sharply interrupted him with,
" Stop, stop, please. Dr. Christison. It is much better that
the public should not know it." Years afterwards it was
vividly recalled to the memory of his then student class, that
Lamson, who was a member of his audience as a medical
student, and exceptionally assiduous in note-taking, was
present on one of the occasions when Professor Christison
was explaining to his class that the real name of the poison
72 POISON MYSTERIES
which the Court had prevented him from naming was " aconi-
tine."
It is satisfactory to record that toxicology has advanced
since the days of Christison, for Sir Thomas Stevenson, who
gave evidence for the Crown at Lamson's trial, was able to
prove by clinical tests that the boy John had been poisoned
by aconitine, and his murderer, Dr. Lamson, suffered the
extreme penalty of the law.
The aconite now used for medicinal purposes is derived from
the Aconitum napellus, chiefly grown in Britain. It is also
found in the mountainous districts of the temperate parts of
the northern hemisphere. It grows on the Alps, the Pyrenees,
the mountains of Germany and Austria and also in Denmark
and Sweden. On the Himalayas it is found at 10,000 to
16,000 feet above the sea-level. Both the root and the leaves
are used medicinally. Aconite contains several alkaloids, all
of which are powerful poisons, the chief of these being aconi-
tine— one of the most* deadly poisons known — the fiftieth
part of a grain of which has nearly caused death. Indian
aconite known as " Bish " is chiefly derived from Aconi-
tum ferox — a native of high altitude in the Himalaya
regions — and is mentioned by the Persian physician, Alhervi,
in the tenth century, and also by many early Arabian writers
on medicine. Ali Ben Isa pronounced it to be the most rapid
of deadly poisons, and describes the symptoms with tolerable
correctness. The chief symptoms of poisoning by aconite are
heat, numbness and tingling in the mouth and throat, giddi-
ness, and loss of muscular power. The pupils become dilated,
the skin cold and pulse feeble, with oppressed breathing and
dread of approaching death. Finally, numbness and para-
lysis come on, rapidly followed by death in a few sudden gasps.
The poison being extremely rapid in effect, immediate action
is absolutely necessary to save life.
Several species of aconite grow plentifully in India, where
it has been used for centuries. It is found growing,
among other places, in the Singalilas, a mountain range
which forms the watershed boundary between Nepal
and British territory, north-west of Darjiling. Aconitum
palmatum is collected in abundance at Tongloo, the southern
termination of the Singalilas, but Aconitum napellus, which
SUPERSTITIONS AND POISONOUS PLANTS 73
is more poisonous, requires a higher elevation in which to
thrive. The natives, especially the hill tribes, take aconite
in the crude state as a remedy for various ailments, and every
Bhotiah has a few dried roofs put away in some secure corner
of his hut.
Early in October, when the aconite root' has matured,
the collecting begins, and one of the leading men of the
village organizes a party composed of both sexes. He, for
the time, becomes their leader, settles all disputes and
quarrels while out in camp, and, while keeping an account
of general expenses, supplies to each all necessaries in the
way of food. Before starting he has to obtain a 'permit'
from the Forest Department, the charge for which is fif-
teen rupees. Carefully wrapping the permit in a rag and
placing it in his network bag of valuables, he collects his
band together, and they set out for the higher ranges. As
soon as they arrive at the slopes where aconite is growing
plentifully, they set to work to build bamboo huts about
five feet high, roofing them with leaves. After the morn-
ing meal they all set off for the lower slopes, each with his
basket and spade over his shoulder. But before the actual
work is commenced, a ceremony has to be performed. The
Bhotiahs, like the Nepalese, have a belief that the presiding
demon of the hills imprisons evil spirits in the aconite plant,
which fly out as soon as it is dug up, and inflict dire calamtiy
on the digger. In order, therefore, to counteract this, every
morning before the digging commences, the lama or headman,
standing on a convenient hill with his followers around him,
makes a fire and burns some dhuna, a native resin, then,
inserting two fingers in his mouth, blows several shrill whistles.
All wait in breathless silence till an answering whistle is heard,
which may be an echo or the cry of some bird. Whatever it
may be, it is taken as the dying dirge of the evil spirits, and
digging begins at once.
The roots, after being shaken from the soil, are placed in
the baskets, which on return to the encampments are emptied
and formed into heaps, and covered with bamboo leaves to
protect them from the frost. During the day they are spread
out in the sun to dry. When a sufficient quantity has been
collected and dried thus, bamboo frames are fixed up with a
fire below, on which the aconite is placed when the flame has
died out. The one who looks after the drying process has a
cloth tied round his head covering the nose, as the constant
74 POISON MYSTERIES
inhalation of the fumes causes a feeHng of heaviness and dizzi-
ness in the head. This process is carried on three or four days
until the roots are dried. When sufficient have been col-
lected and dried they are packed in baskets. These are
shouldered, and with their cooking utensils and blankets on
the top, the whole band set their faces homeward. On
arrival at the commercial centre at the termination of their
march the results of the expedition are soon sold, and each
man is handed his share of the profits, according to the amount
of aconite he has collected.
Hemlock, or cicuta, was a classical poison well known
to the ancients. References are made to it in Greek literature
as early as the fourth or fifth century B.C. The old Roman
name of Conium was Cicuta, but it was applied in the
sixteenth century by Gesner to other varieties of the plant, such
as cicuta virosa, which is of a non-poisonous nature. Its
use by the ancient Greeks as a State poison has already been
fully described in a preceding chapter. It was used in Anglo-
Saxon medicine, and is mentioned in the vocabulary of Alfric
as early as the tenth century. The name " Hemlock " is
derived from the Anglo-Saxon words " hem," border or shore,
and " leac." Its chief active principle, conine, is a colourless
oily liquid, which resembles nicotine in its action. It is
to Linnaeus we owe the use of the classical Greek name
Conium macula turn in 1737.
Another plant around which clustered many superstitions
in ancient times was black hellebore, called Melampus
root, or Christmas Rose. It is said to have taken its name
from Melampus, a traditionary physician, who is said to
have flourished at Pylus about 1530 B.C. He is reputed
to have cured the daughters of Proetus, King of Argus,
of mental derangement and leprosy with hellebore. Pliny
states that the daughters of Proetus were restored to their
senses by drinking the milk of goats which had fed on
hellebore. Black hellebore root was used by the ancients
to hallow their dwellings, and they believed that by strew-
ing it about it would drive away evil spirits. This ceremony
was performed with great devotion, and accompanied with
the singing of solemn hymns. They also blessed their cattle
with hellebore in the same manner to keep them free from the
SUPERSTITIONS AND POISONOUS PLANTS 75
spells of the wicked. For these purposes it was dug up with
many religious ceremonies — such as drawing a circle round
the plant with a sword ; then, turning to the East, a humble
prayer was finally offered up by the devotee to Apollo and
Aesculapius for leave to dig up the root. The flight of the
eagle was particularly attended to during the ceremony, for
should this bird approach near the spot during the cele-
bration of the rite, it was considered so ominous as to predict
the certain death of the person who uprooted the plant in the
course of the year. Others ate garlic previous to the rite,
which was supposed to counteract the poisonous effluvia of
the plant. Dioscorides relates that when Carneades, the
Cyrenaic philosopher, undertook to answer the books of
Zeno, he sharpened his wit and quickened his spirit by purg-
ing his head with powdered hellebore, and it is of this
plant Juvenal sarcastically observes "Misers need a double
dose of hellebore." It is stated that the Gauls never went
to the chase without rubbing the point of their arrows with
this herb, believing that it would render the game killed with
them all the more tender.
Hyoscyamus, commonly called henbane, is a herb which
has been employed in medicine from early times. Benedictus
Crispus, Archbishop of Milan, in a work written shortly before
A.D. 681, alludes to it under the name of hyoscamus and sym-
phoniaca, and in the tenth century its virtues are recorded in
the works of Macer Floridus. In the early Anglo-Saxon
manuscripts it is called henbell and sometimes belene. In a
French herbal of the fifteenth century it is called hanibane or
hanebane. From ancient times it has been employed as a
sedative and anodyne for producing sleep, although hallu-
cinations sometimes accompany its use. Its chief active
principles are hyoscyamine and hyoscine, both of which
are very powerful poisons. An old tradition states, that
once in the refectory of an ancient monastery, the monks
were served in error by the cook with henbane instead
of some harmless vegetable. After partaking of the dish
they were seized with the most extraordinary hallucinations.
At midnight one monk sounded the bell for matins, while
others walked in the chapel and opened their books, but
could not read. Others sang roystering drinking songs and
76 POISON MYSTERIES
performed mountebank antics, which convulsed the others
with uncontrollable laughter, and the pious monastery for
the nonce was turned into a lunatic asylum.
There are few drugs used to-day with a more interesting
history than opium. It figures not only in history but also
in romance and crime. It has been associated with the
acquisition of wealth and prosperity and with the most terrible
degradation. Opium has been the cause of war, of bitter
feeling and punishments, and whilst it has enslaved many
with the most pleasurable hallucinations, and relieved the
most agonizing pains, it is capable of reducing human beings
to the level of the beasts.
It is mentioned in the Papyrus Ebers, one of the earliest
known records of medicine, as having been known and used
by the Egyptians about 1550 years B.C. It is described by
Theophrastus as having been used by the Greeks 300 years
B.C. and is supposed to have formed the chief ingredient in the
potion known as " Nepenthe '' which Helen of Troy gave to
the guests of Menelaus to drive away their care. This con-
jecture receives support from Homer, who states that Nepenthe
was obtained from Thebes, the ancient capital of Egypt.
According to Prosper Alpinus, the Egyptians were practised
opium eaters and were often faint and languid through the
want of it. They prepared and drank it in the form of
" Cretic Wine," which they flavoured and made hotter by
the addition of pepper and other aromatics. Scribonius
Largus (a.d. 40) mentions the method of preparing opium
and points out that the true drug is derived from the capsules
of the poppy and not from the foliage of the plant.
Dioscorides, in the same century, describes how the capsules
from which the drug is collected should be cut and the milky
juices collected, and one can infer from his statements that
the collection of opium was at that time a source of industry
in Asia Minor. Pliny gives an account of " opion," while it
is also mentioned by Celsus, a Roman medical writer of the
first century, and by several other Latin authors, who allude
to it by the quaint name of " poppy tears."
It was well known to the Arabs, who transmitted their
knowledge of its properties first to the Persians and then to
other nations of the East. In India its introduction would
SUPERSTITIONS AND POISONOUS PLANTS 77
appear to be connected with the spread of Mahommedanism,
and may have been favoured by their prohibition of the use
of wine. The earhest mention of opium in connection with
India occurs in the travels of Barbosa, who visited CaHcut
and the Malabar Coast in 1511, and who gives it a prominent
place with other valuable drugs. Pyres, the first ambassador
from Europe to China in 1516, speaks of the opiiun of Egypt,
Cambay, and the kingdom of Cous (Kus Bahar, S.W. Bhotan
in Bengal), and states it was eaten by " the kings and lords,
and even the common people, though not so much because it
costs dear." In the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries its
praises were sung by poets of the Far East.
It is believed that opium was introduced by the Arabs into
both India and China, as they are known to have traded with
the southern parts of the empire as early as the ninth century.
In the eighteenth century the Chinese marketed the drug in
their junks as a return cargo from India, and it was at that
time almost exclusively used as a remedy for dysentery, but
the trade grew, and in 1787 the importation reached a thousand
chests, for some years most of the trade being in the hands of
the Portuguese.
The East India Company in 1780 opened an opium depot
with two small vessels at Lark's Bay, Macao. The Chinese
authorities began to complain of these two ships in 1793, but
the trafiic still increased, until they issued an edict forbidding
any vessel having opium on board to enter the Canton River.
This led to political differences which culminated in the war
that was called the " Opium War." It was concluded by
the Treaty of Nankin, after which five ports of China were
opened to foreign trade, opium being admitted as a legalized
import in 1858.
Opium smoking does not appear to have been known in
China until the latter part of the seventeenth century, but
within a hundred years it spread like the tentacles of an
octopus over the entire empire. At this time the authorities
became greatly alarmed at the injurious effects among the
people following the abuse of opium. Suicides became fre-
quent and the high officials and all classes were becoming
rapid slaves to the habit ; the sale rose from 2,300 chests in
1788 to 17,500 in 1836. The first edict was issued in 1796
yS POISON MYSTERIES
and since that time they have been innumerable, but the
traffic increased and is still almost universally carried on.
In 1879 i^ the State of Amoy and its adjacent towns the
proportion of opium smokers was estimated at from fifteen to
twenty per cent, of the total population.
With regard to the introduction of opium into India, the
Mahommedans, once having established its use, began to
make it a source of income. The Great Mogul monopolized the
opium production and trade, and derived an immense income
from its sale. From reliable reports it appears that in
India " the largest amount of opium is produced in the
central tract of the Ganges, extending from Dinapore in the
east to Agra in the west, and from Gorakhpur in the north
to Hazaribagh in the south, comprising an area of about
six hundred miles long and two hundred miles broad." In
the district of Bengal, the Government has the monopoly of
the opium industry, and the districts are divided into two
agencies, Behar and Benares, which are under the control of
officers residing in Patna and Ghazipur. In 1883 the number
of acres under poppy cultivation in Behar was 463,829, and
the Benares district 412,625 ; but the export of opium has
somewhat diminished since then. Anyone may undertake
the industry, but cultivators are obliged to sell the opium
exclusively to the Government agencies, at a price which is
fixed beforehand by the officials. The Government sells
the ready goods to merchants at a much higher price, which
difference is paid by the country to which the opium is
exported. In India itself, the sale of opium is restricted to
licensed shopkeepers, a practice which has proved to be useful,
because in some places, when the licensed shops have been
closed, a greater number of unlicensed and secret places have
sprung up, and have made the contract insufficient.
The opium question is so complex in its nature, and is so
largely influenced by the habits and constitution of those
nations who are addicted to its use, that it is obvious that
only those with skilled medical knowledge, who are on the
spot and have lived and had a daily experience of the people,
are in a proper position to deal with the question. So much
has been written by religious enthusiasts, and other persons
totally ignorant of the nature and properties of the
SUMRSTITIONS AND I^OISONOUS PLANTS 79
drug, that one almost hesitates to touch upon the sub-
ject.
The following facts have been furnished by reliable medical
authorities, who are really in a position to judge on the
matter.
The cause which led to the use of this narcotic drug, by the
races of the East, as already stated, may have been primarily
due to the prohibition of wine by the Moslems, but more
likely on account of its remedial or protective properties
being needed by a race subject to malaria and kindred diseases,
and to counteract the effect of the hot climate to which they
are exposed. It is a remedy at hand, and would seem to be
one to which they at once fly. The evil lies more in the
smoking than the eating of the drug, the former habit being
more prevalent in China, and has the more demoralizing
effect. The extent of its use in the East varies according to
the geographical and social differences of the people, and it is
used in various degrees of moderation and excess.
The drug is employed in various forms, according to the
class of people who consume it. In India it is largely used
in the crude state, and is sold at about two annas a drachm,
in small square pieces. The opium eater will take two or
three grains and roll them into the form of a pill between his
fingers, and then chew or swallow it, often twenty times in
the day. It is also used in a liquid form called Kusamba,
made by macerating opium in rose-water ; others boil it with
milk, then collect the cream and eat it. The varieties for
smoking are known as Chundoo and Mudat, the former being
a very impure extract of a fairly stiff consistency, and the
latter made from the refuse of Chundoo, of which it largely
consists ; but being much cheaper, is chiefly used by the
low-class Hindus and Mahomedans. From two to four
grains a day may be called a moderate use of the crude drug.
The poorer people regularly give it to children up to two
years of age, to keep them quiet, also as a preventive against
such complaints as enteritis, which is very common in the East ;
and so before youth is reached they become inured to its
action. Licences to sell the drug are sold to the highest bidder
at the opium auctions, the licensee having the privilege of
supplying a certain number of small dealers.
8o POISON MYSTERIES
The Chinese smoker usually lays himself down on his side,
with his head supported by a pillow. On the straw mat
beside him between his doubled-up knees and his nose, a small
glass oil lamp, covered with a glass shade, is burning. Close
to this is a tray, containing a small round box, holding the
drug, a straight piece of wire used for manipulating it, a knife
to scrape up the fragments, and the pipe used for smoking.
The latter is about two feet long, with a nose of about half
an inch in diameter, and is not unlike the stem of a flute
before it is fittedl About two inches from the bottom of the
tube, is a closed cup or bowl of earthenware or stone, having
a central perforation. To charge the pipe, a small portion
of the drug (weighing a few grains) is picked up with the wire,
kneaded and rolled in the closed surface of the cup, then
heated in the flame of the lamp till it swells. This is rolled
up and again manipulated, then finally placed in the aperture
in the surface of the bowl. It is then lighted from the lamp,
and the smoke drawn into the lungs through the tube till the
first charge is exhausted.
In a report made by the British Medical Journal concerning
the use of opium in India, from the evidence of medical men
long resident in that country, there seems a general consensus
of opinion that opium eating, in the majority of cases, exer-
cises, no unfavourable influence on the people who indulge in
the habit, and that it is a prophylactic against fever, and
prevents the natives from malaria and excessive fatigue.
There is no comparison between the effects of the opium
habit and the habitual use of alcohol. English people cannot
judge, from thfeir own standard, the manners and customs of
people living Tmder conditions with which they are unac-
quainted. While we look upon opium as a narcotic, the
Hindu uses it as a stimulant to enable him to go through
hard work on the smallest quantity possible of food. With
reference to the measures suggested by the Committee of the
League of Nations for the suppression of the use of opium
in India, the Jam Sahib of Nawanagar has recently declared
that it would be impossibile to carry them out. It was a
habit among working men who needed opium, just as the
European wanted tobacco. In Persia, at the present time,
according to Wills, nine out of ten of the aged, take from one
SUPERSTITIONS AND POISONOUS PLANTS 8i
to five grains of the drug daily. It is largely used by the
native physicians. It does not appear that the moderate
use of Persian opium in the country itself is deleterious.
Opium smoking is almost unknown, and when it is smoked,'
it is, as a rule, by a doctor's orders. The opium pill-
box— a tiny box of silver — is as common in Persia as the
snuffbox was once with us. Most men of forty in the
middle and upper classes take from a grain to a grain and
a half, divided into two pills, one in the afternoon and
one at night. The majority of authorities agree that opium
smoking as a habit is much more harmful and attended with
much more demoralizing influences than opium eating ; but
either habit is undoubtedly harmful to Eiuopeans, and when
once formed, is extremely difficult to break.
Paracelsus is generally credited with being the originator
of the word " laudanum," the name by which tincture of
opium is commonly known. Yet there seems little doubt
the word was first applied to the gum of the cistus. Clusius,
in his Rariorum Plantar nm Historia, states : " The gum of
the cistus is called in Greek and Latin, ladanum, and
in shops laudanum." It is therefore very likely that the
secret preparation originated by Paracelsus which he called
laudanum, was composed of the gum of the cistus as well
as opium, and that he adopted the title from the former
ingredient.
Sir Henry Holland, in his Recollections, ^ relates that
Mehemet AH, whom he visited, brought the conversation
round to poisons. It ended by Mehemet Ali asking him
point-blank whether he knew of any poison which, put on the
mouthpiece of a pipe or given in coffee, might slowly and
silently kill, leaving no note behind. Holland instantly
answered that " as a physician he had studied how to save
life, not destroy it." This reply, he added, was probably
faithfully translated to Mehemet Ali, for he dropped the
subject abruptly, and never afterwards reverted to it. Des-
genettes, when it was suggested to him by Napoleon that he
should poison the plague-stricken soldiers at Jaffa, curtly
answered that it was his business to prolong life, not to kill.
When he was driven from Leipzig in defeat and disaster,
1 Recollections of Past Life, Sir Henry Holland.
F
82 POISON MYSTERIES
culminating in his abdication at Fontainebleau, it is said
Napoleon attempted to end his life by means of opium.
During the retreat from Moscow the Emperor requested his
physician to provide him with means to prevent his falling
into the hands of the enemy alive, and was supplied with a
drug which he carried in a small packet suspended round his
neck. Either from the poison losing its properties or having
become innocuous, it is said only to have thrown Napoleon,
after he took it, into a deep sleep, from which he awoke in
spasms.
The Kiowa and other Mexican Indians use the fruit of the
Anhelonium Lewinii, which they call "mescal buttons," to
produce a species of intoxication and stimulation during
certain of their religious ceremonies. The effects of this fruit,
which, like Indian hemp, varies considerably in different
individuals, are very peculiar, and have been described by
Lewin, Prentiss and Morgan.
The eating of the fruit first results in a state of strange
excitement and great exuberance of spirits, accompanied by
volubilit}^ in speech. This is shortly followed by a stage of
intoxication in which the sight is affected in a very extra-
ordinary manner, consisting of a kaleidoscopic play of colours
ever in motion, of every possible shade and tint, and these
constantly changing. The pupils of the eyes are widely
dilated, cutaneous sensation is blunted and thoughts seem to
flash through the brain with extraordinary rapidity. The
colour visions are generally only seen with closed eyes, but
the colouring of all external objects is exaggerated. Some-
times there is also an indescribable sensation of dual existence.
Some years ago Havelock Ellis published an account
of the use and his personal experiences of the properties of
mescal buttons. The Mexican Indians treat this cactus
with great veneration, gathering it with uncovered heads
and amid clouds of incense.
The celebration of the rite is usually held on a Saturday
night, when seated in a circle around a large camp fire, for the
visions are said to be most intense by flickering firelight.
The men pray for " a good intoxication," and then the leader
passes the drug around. Throughout the night the men sit
quietly round the fire in a state of reverie, absorbed in colour
SUPERSTITIONS AND POISONOUS PLANTS 83
visions, amid continual singing and beating of drums by
assistants. The effects do not pass off till the following noon,
when they get up and go about their business with apparently
no depression or other after-effects.
After taking three of the buttons in small fragments by
pouring boiling water on them twice and drinking the in-
fusion thrice at intervals of an hour, Ellis states that the
phenomena of mescal intoxication are merely the saturnalia
of the specific senses and chiefly an orgy of vision.
After a transient consciousness of energy, he felt faint and
giddy, pale violet shadows floated before him, suggesting,
without any definite form, pictures. The air seemed to be
filled with a vague perfume, then he saw glorious fields of
jewels which sprang into flower-like shapes before his gaze,
and then turned into butterfly forms.
"I was further impressed," he says, "not only by the
brilliance and delicate beauty of their colours, but even more
by their lovely and various textures."
A friend, to whom he gave some of the drug, experienced a
pain at the heart and a sensation of imminent death, then
with the suddenness of a neuralgic pain the back of his head
seemed to open and emit streams of bright colour. " I had
the sensation of the skin disappearing from the brow ; any
movement sent out streams of blue flames of wondrous
beauty."
The Mexicans also make a drink from the mescal, which
is distilled from the juice of the plant, and during their social
entertainments swallow it in copious draughts. Its effects
are said to be highly intoxicating, and according to the reports
of authorities 90 per cent, of the crimes perpetrated in the
ranches and villages are due to this poisonous liquid.
Recent investigation into the pharmacology of the mescal
plant prove it to be a poison of a very powerful natui'e.
Large doses produce complete paralysis, and death is caused
by respiratory failure.
CHAPTER VI
THE POISON LORE OF TOADS AND SPIDERS
FROM early times the toad has had an unenviable reputation
and has been suspected of poisonous properties. Some
of the early historians attribute the death of King John of Eng-
land to a friar who placed a toad in his cup of wine. The
story is no doubt fictitious, but there is some ground for the evil
reputation that has so long been associated with this unlovely
reptile. The venom of some toads is believed to possess
poisonous properties in certain countries throughout the world,
and some species are said to be particularly virulent. A few
years ago Phisalix and Bertrand undertook an investigation
to ascertain if there was any truth in the story of the poisonous
properties attributed to toads. They succeeded in extracting
two powerful principles from the parotid gland and skin
of the common toad. One of these was found to act on
the heart in a similar manner to digitalis, and the other
known as bufotenine exercises a powerful paralysing action
on the nerve centres.
The Ceratophrys ornata, a toad found in South America,
is of a very poisonous nature. It will bite anything that
comes in its way and then hang on with the tenacity of a
bulldog, poisoning the blood with its glandular secretion.
Death may follow its bite, and it has been known to kill a
horse by gripping him by the nose, while the animal was
cropping grass.
Shakespeare alludes to the evil reputation of the toad in two
of his plays and the
" Toad, that under cold stone,
Days and nights went thirty-one
Swelter' d venom sleeping got,"
formed an ingredient in the witches' hell-broth in " Macbeth."
84
THE POISON LORE OF TOADS AND SPIDERS 85
When dropped into the wine cup it was beUeved to act
with deadly effect on those who drank its contents.
In connection with the poison of the toad there is an inter-
esting record on a medical diploma at present in the Library
of Ferrara, which was granted to one Generoso Marini in 1642.
Marini appears to have made an application for a diploma of
medicine and the judges who had the power of granting such
degrees, ordered him to produce some efficient proofs of his
capability to practise the healing art. Marini agreed to
comply with their demand and the result is recorded on his
diploma, which was discovered by Cittadella among the
archives of Ferrara some years ago ; it reads as follows : —
" Having publicly examined and approved the science and
knowledge of medicine of Signor Generoso Marini, and his
possession of the wonderful secret called ' Orvietano,' which
he exhibited on the stage built in the centre of this our city
of Ferrara, in presence of its entire population, so remarkable
for their civilisation and learning, and in presence of many
foreigners and other classes of people, we hereby certify that,
also in our presence, as well as that of the city authorities, he
took several living toads, not those of his own providing, but
from a great number of toads, which had been caught in fields
in the locality by persons who were strangers to him, and
which were only handed to him at the moment of making the
experiment. An officer of the court then selected from the
number of toads collected, five of the largest, which the said
Generoso Marini placed on a bench before him, and in presence
of all assembled spectators, he, with a large knife, cut all the
said toads in half. Then, taking a drinking cup, he took in
each hand one half of a dead toad, and squeezed from it all
the juices and fluids it contained into the cup, and the same
he did with the remainder. After mixing the contents
together, he swallowed the whole, and then placing the cup
on the bench he advanced to the edge of the stage, where for
some minutes he remained stationary. Then he became pale
as death and his limbs trembled and his body began to swell
in a frightful and terrible manner ; and all the spectators
began to believe that he would never recover from the poison
he had swallowed, and that his death was certain. Suddenly
taking from a jar by his side some of his celebrated 'Orvie-
tano,' he placed a portion of it in his mouth and swallowed it.
Instantly the effect of this wonderful medicine was to make
86 POISON MYSTERIES
him vomit the poison he had taken, and he stood before the
spectators in the full enjoyment of health.
" The populace applauded him highly for the indisputable
proof he had given of his talent, and he then invited many
of the most learned of those present to accompany him to
his house, and he there showed them his dispensary as well
as his collection of antidotes, and among them a powder
made from little vipers, a powerful remedy for curing every
sort of fever, as he had proved by different experiments he
had made on people of quality and virtue, all of whom he had
cured of the fever from which they were suffering, etc.
" In consequence of the rare talent exhibited by Signor
Generoso Marini, and as a proof of our love and respect for
his wisdom, we have resolved by the authority placed in our
hands publicly to reward him with a diploma so that he may
be universally recognised, applauded and respected. In
witness thereof we have set our hands and the public seal of
the municipality of Ferrara.
" Data in Ferrara con grandissimo applauso il di 26 Luglio,
1642.
" Joannes Cajetanus Modoni,
Index sapientum Civitatis Ferrari.
" Franciscus Altramari,
Cancellarius."
But although the toad under certain conditions was credited
with poisonous properties, during the Middle Ages it was
esteemed a valuable remedy for the plague and was employed
for that purpose in Austria as late as the year 1712.
The country people of Brazil believe the milky secretion of
the common toad possesses wonderful curative properties and
use it externally as a cure for shingles. In these cases living
toads are generally applied to the part affected.
The poisonous drug known as " Senso " in China and Japan
is said to be composed of the dried poison from a species of
toad. It has been found to contain cholesterol, the bufagin
of Abel and Macht ; bufotenine, and a base resembling epine-
phrine. Bufagin causes a marked rise of blood pressure, and
acts as a diuretic. It is toxic in small doses. Bufotenine
acts as a local anaesthetic, causes convulsions of the medullary
type, and is pharmacologically allied to picrotoxin. The
base, resembling epinephrine, is a powerful sympathicomi-
metic poison.
THE POISON LORE OF TOADS AND SPIDERS 8y
Certain species of spider possess poisonous properties,
notably the Chiracanthium nutrix and the Epeira diadema.
The bite of the female of the former is distinctly venomous,
r.nd one milligramme of the juice of the latter variety injected
into a cat resulted in death.
Some curious methods of the manner in which some Indian
tribes of South America utilize a poisonous grass as a method
of defence have been investigated by Bomain. He found that
a belt of this plant formed a natural barrier between the
Indian tribes who lived on each side of a range of moun-
tains, where it flourished. Animals died a,s soon as they
ate the poisonous grass, and thus a hostile tribe was prevented
from encroaching on the territory of another.
On scientific investigation, it was discovered that a few
hundred grains of the grass would kill a horse or a mule in an
hour or two, the deadly effect being due to the production of
prussic acid, which was caused by the decomposition of a
glucosive under the influence of a ferment.
A mysterious poison is said to be known among some of
the gipsy tribes of Europe which is supposed to consist of tlie
germs of a certain poisonous fungus. When mixed with food
it causes death in from two to three weeks after administra-
tion. The symptoms produced are said to be similar to those
of tj^phoid fever. A case of poisoning with this substance,
whicli is known to the gipsies by the name of " Dri " or
" Drei," was reported in London in 1864.
CHAPTER VII
SOME CLASSICAL POISONS AND THEIR HISTORIES
ARSENIC appears to have had an extraordinary fascina-
tion for the poisoner for centuries past and has, perhaps,
been more frequently used than any other substance for
criminal purposes. Through its history runs a vein of
mystery and romance which has continued until the present
day.
It was known to the Greeks as early as the fifth century
before Christ. Hippocrates, the father of medicine, who
flourished 460-377 B.C., used it as an external remedy for
ulcers and similar disorders. It was known to the Greeks
in that time in the form of sulphuret of arsenic or realgar,
also as arsenic sulphide or orpiment, which is found native
in Greece and Hungary. Dioscorides knew it in its later form
and also mentions its properties when applied externally.
There is no allusion at this period to its employment either
as a poison or for internal treatment of disease.
The golden colour of orpiment caused many of the early
alchemists to consider it the key to the philosophers' stone,
and this is said to be grounded on some enigmatical phrase
attributed to the Sibylline oracles. The Emperor Caligula
(a.d. 12-41), according to Pliny, ordered a large quantity of
orpiment to be melted and manipulated so that the gold it
was supposed to contain could be extracted from it, but he
was no doubt disappointed by the result.
Diocletian (a.d. 260) is said to have collected all the books
dealing with the transmutation of metals possessed by the
Egyptians whom he had conquered, and destroyed them ; but,
when the Arabs overran Egypt, the Jews who fled to Europe,
carried with them the knowledge of chemistry they had
acquired from the Arabs who kept the lamp of alchemy alive.
88
SOME CLASSICAL POISONS 89
In the eighth century there arose a great Arab alchemist
called Jabir ibn Hayyan, whose writings were known under
the name of Geber: He is said to have been a native of Tarsus
and believed to have been the first in Europe to obtain what
is now known as white arsenic (arsenious acid) by heating
realgar. He gave it the name which it still bears to distin-
guish it from orpiment or yellow arsenic. From his works
we know that he was acquainted with metallic arsenic and
apparently knew, that under certain conditions, it deposited
a dull silver coat when in contact with bright copper. This
discovery was not without its disadvantages to mankind, as
from this period probably dates the time it became used for
criminal purposes. On the other hand, its medicinal pro-
perties, when properly administered, became known and
recognized by physicians.
Before white arsenic or arsenious acid was known, most
of the poisons recorded by the early writers had something
peculiar in regard to their taste, smell or colour, but white
arsenic put a new instrument in the hands of the cunning
poisoner who sought for something powerful and tasteless for
his evil designs, which we shall see later developed into a
diabolical art in several parts of Europe.
In India, arsenic has been commonly used for criminal pur-
poses from ancient times down to the present. The reports
of the Analyst of the Bombay Government throw consid-
erable light on the methods pursued by native poisoners.
In most cases the poison is introduced into sweetmeats
and generally distributed by a " strange woman " who has
been met in the bazaar or street and who mysteriously dis-
appears. This " strange woman " is found in nearly every
analyst's report for the past fifty years and under much the
same circumstances. Most of the cases are typical of the
people among whom they occur, as instanced in the account '
of a man who went into a shop one day and entered into
friendly conversation with a stranger he met there. By way
of thanking him, the stranger presented him with some sweets
for distribution among his friends. The result was that five
men and a boy were poisoned, and the obliging stranger has
never been heard of since.
It is difficult to account (or the rationale in such cases, but
90 POISON MYSTERIES
still they occur and the professional poisoner in India — for
there are many such' — 'is rarely caught or even suspected.
In many instances, crimes of this kind are taken little
notice of by the community and sometimes the criminal
apparently thinks nothing of poisoning a whole family in
order to make sure of his victim. The utter absence of motive
in many cases would point to the conclusion that they are
largely the result of homicidal mania.
In the Middle Ages there was a prevalent idea that all
poisonous substances possessed a powerful and mutual elec-
tive attraction for each other, and if a portion of the sub-
stance was worn suspended round the neck it would intercept
and absorb all other noxious matter and even preserve the
body from contagion of disease. During the Great Plague
of London amulets containing arsenic were worn suspended
over the region of the heart and were believed thus to preserve
the wearer from infection.
It is characteristic of arsenic, antimony and mercury that their
presence may be detected and demonstrated years after they
have been taken into the body. Many cases might be cited
in corroboration of this, but the following is one of peculiar
interest. A wealthy farmer died and was buried in the grave
where his father had been interred thirty-five years pre-
viously. An examination of certain of the bones of the father
revealed particles of a metallic-looking substance which was
collected, and on analysis proved to be mercury. It had thus
been preserved in the remains for more than a third of a
century, the probability being that he had been in the habit
of taking it medicinally during the latter part of his life.
Another case worthy of record came under the notice of a
Bristol analyst, in which he found abundant traces of arsenic
in the remains of young children after they had been buried
for eight years.
A curious case, proving how the advance of science may
influence the rendering of justice, is shown in a striking way
by a decision of the Judicial Committee of the revision of
trials in France in February, 1904. Twenty-five years pre-
viously one Dauval, a chemist, had been found guilty of the
murder of his wife by poisoning her with arsenic, and was
sentenced to transportation for life. Scientific evidence
SOME CLASSICAL POISONS 91
having since come to light, tending to show that he was
innocent of the crime, he was granted a free pardon eighteen
months previous to the meeting of the Judicial Committee.
The evidence on which Dauval was f cund guilty was purely
scientific, and later investigation showed the evidence in
question to be open to doubt. At the trial in 1879, ^.H the
expert witnesses swore, that the quantity of arsenic — nam.ely
one milligrammc-^fourid in the body of Dauval's wife after
the post-mortem examination, could net possibly have existed
in the system under natural circumstances. It was held to
be proved thsit the presence of such a quantity of the poison
was incompatible with life. Since the trial Gautier and
Bertrarid and other seiejitific workers have demonstrated that
the quantity of arsenic mentioned can, and frequently does,
exist in the hunrtan body in a normal condition. The pre-
sumption thus set up in Dauval's defence was, that the
presence of arsenic in his wife's remains was owing to her
having been in the habit of taking the drug in medicinal doses.
A strange story is related by the late Sir Richard Quain
that came under his notice, and one which would have proved
a profound mystery to this day but for his practical knowledge
and acumen. He was asked to make a post-mortem examin-
ation on the body of a man who was by trade a stone-mason.
To continue the story in his own words ; " One day, on coming
in to his dinner, he went into the scullery, washed his hands,
and going into the kitchen he said to his wife, ' It is all
over ; I have taken poison.' ' What have you taken ? '
' Arsenic,' he replied, and she at once took him off to the
Western General Dispensary.
" The senior surgeon was out when they got there, but two
young students of his happened to be in, who thought it was a
very important case, and they would treat it pretty actively.
So they gave him tartar emetic, pumped out the stomach, and
pumped oxide of iron into it, and performed a gcod many
other operations. The poor man was extremely ill and died
in twenty-four hours. The coroner's beadle went to the
chemist and said : ' How did you come to sell this man
poison? ' He replied, ' I scld him no poison; I thought he
was off his head when he came.' ' What did you give him ? '
' Oh, I gave him some alum and cream of tartar and labelled
92 POISON MYSTERIES
it poison.' " " He swallowed this in the belief it was arsenic,"
says Sir Richard. " When I made the post-mortem examin-
ation, to my amazement I found a great deal of arsenic in the
stomach. This was rather puzzling. I said, if it is in the
stomach it ought to go farther down. So I searched the
intestines, but there was no trace of arsenic anywhere. The
simple explanation of it was this, these two young fellows,
horrified to find the man had died without taking arsenic after
all, pumped some into the stomach."
Another instance that terminated in a less tragic manner,
in which a would-be suicide was frustrated by a watchful
chemist, happened some years ago. One morning a tall,
decently-dressed man, of seafaring aspect, entered a chemist's
shop in the neighbourhood of the docks of a northern seaport,
and in a solemn and confidential manner asked for a shilling's
worth of strong laudanum.
" For what purpose do you require it ? " asked the chemist.
" Well, you see, sir," the man explained, " I've just come
off a voyage from 'Frisco, and I find my sweetheart has gone
off with Jim, you see, sir, and now it's all up with me. Give
me a strong dose please, and if you don't think a shilling's
worth will be enough "
" But, my good man — — " interrupted the chemist.
" I'U shoot myself if not, sir, I will," replied the man,
thrusting his hand into his pocket.
" All right, then," said the chemist ; and seeing that
argument was useless, he proceeded to mix an innocent but
nauseous draught of aloes.
" Now put in a shilling's worth of arsenic."
" Very well," replied the chemist, adding some harmless
magnesia.
" And you might as well throw in a shilling's worth of
prussic acid," said the broken-hearted lover.
The chemist carefully measured a little essence of almonds
into the glass and handed it to the would-be suicide. He paid,
swallowed it at one draught, and solemnly walked out of the
shop. Crossing the street, which was quiet at the time, he
deliberately laid himself fiat on his back on the footpath and
closed his eyes. A group of children gathered round, and
stood gazing with their eyes and mouths open in wonderment,
SOME CLASSICAL POISONS 93
and an occasional passer-by stopped a moment, cast a glance
at the unwonted sight and then passed on. After lying thus
quite motionless for about five minutes, he suddenly raised
his head, took a look round, then with one bound jumped to
his feet and made off as hard as he could run.
A parallel case occurred quite recently at Dartmouth,
when a naval stoker after a quarrel with his fiancee, entered
a chemist's shop and asked for an ounce of strychnine. The
chemist, noting his excited manner and becoming suspicious,
to pacify him gave him an ounce of borax which he took
away, and obtaining a glass, mixed it with water and went
out on the cliffs and drank it. Finding it only made him
feel very unwell he resolved to throw himself over the cliffs
into the sea, but the police arrived just in time to prevent him
and found the glass with the remains of borax in it at his side.
In this case it ended in a charge of attempted suicide.
Arsenic has been the favourite medium of female poisoners
from early times, and in two celebrated poison cases of recent
years, in which women were accused of murder by the
administration of arsenic, it has been pleaded that the poison
had been used by them for cosmetic purposes. The effect
of arsenic on the skin is weU known, and also that it is fre-
quently used by women both internally and externally to
improve the complexion. That this practice may lead to the
taking of ai senic as a confirmed habit there is also evidence to
prove, and there are many cases recorded where the habit
of taking arsenic in solution has been contracted by women.
Formerly, many cases of chronic arsenical poisoning have
resulted from arsenic which at one time was used in making
cheap green wall-papers and green sweets (both coloured by
Scheele's green or hydrogen copper arsenite), the arsenic in the
wall-papers being given off in gaseous form during warm damp
weather. It is also found in some artificial flowers, in carpets,
furs, dress fabrics dyed with aniline dyes, and in black stock-
ings. Murrell examined a number of coloured tobacco and
cigarette covers and found arsenic in one-third of them.
Used as an insecticide for spraying fruit, it remains on the
skins and is sometimes eaten. In these minute doses it
seldom does any harm, but may produce chronic poisoning,
with loss of hair, neuritis and other harmful results.
94 POISON MYSTERIES
Arsenic is poisonous to all animals with a central nervous
system (brain or spinal cord) and to most of the higher plants.
Mice show the greatest resistance and next come hedgehogs,
rabbits, dogs and cats.
In 1903 an analysis of sweets in the Isle of Wight revealed
the presence of i/i5th of a grain of arsenic per pound.
When arsenic is taken for some time it finds its way into the
hair within about two weeks and remains there for years.
The alleged practice of eating arsenic or taking it as a habit
has long been a matter of discussion, and as far back as the
early part of the last century toxicologists were sceptical as
to the statement that the inhabitants of Styria, and other
parts of Hungary where arsenic is formd, had contracted
the regular habit of taking the drug until they had almost
become immune to its effects.
In 1865, Maclagan of Edinburgh visited Styria for the
purpose of investigating these statements, and he affirms in
an account of his visit given in the Edinburgh Medical Journal,
1865, that while he was staying at the village of Legist in
Middle Styria, two men were brought to him, and in his pres-
ence one took about 4I and the other 6 grains of white arsenic.
He brought back samples of what they had swallowed, and
on testing it found it to be undoubtedly white arsenic. It
was taken by one man on a piece of bread, and by the. other
was washed down with a draught of water. How extensively
the habit existed in the district Maclagan was not able to
ascertain, but he mentions that the peasants called it Hydrach
or Huttereich. One of the men took a dose about twice a
week, the other , generally once a week, and he learned they
had commenced the habit with dos,es of less than a grain.
The effect was said to be tonic and stimulant and was believed
to aid the respiration when climbing. Once having acquired
the habit, like that of other poisons, an occasional dose is
much missed if omitted.
Arsenic has been a subject of interest to some of our
most eminent chemists, one of whom at least, has fallen a
victim to it. The first to make an accurate investigation of
its chemical nature was Georg Brandt, a Swede, in 1773. The
famous Swedish chemist Scheele (1742-1786) also worked on
the subject, and discovered arsenic acid in 1775, and impure
SOME CLASSICAL POISONS 95
arseniuretted hydrogen. Soubeiran, the French chemist,
together with Pfaff, succeeded in obtaining pure arseniuretted
hydrogen, but so httle was known of its deadly nature that
in 1815 Gehlen, the professor of chemistry at Munich, died
owing to inhahng a minute quantity of the pure gas. Both
BerzeUus (1779-1848) and Bunsen contributed much to the
scientific knowledge of arsenic, and the latter in 1842 dis-
covered an organic radical containing arsenic and methyl,
which became known as cacodyl, the salts of which have
since been introduced into medicine for certain diseases with
satisfactory results.
From the end of the eighteenth century the founders of
the modern science of toxicology, Orfila, Raspail, Christi-
son, Taylor and Thomas Stevenson, devoted the best part of
their lives to the discovery of new and accurate tests for
poisons. Orfila (1787-1853) did his best to make their detec-
tion a matter of certainty by insisting that poisons should be
looked for in other parts of the body and not only in the
alimentary canal. It was in his time that the three principal
tests by liquid reagents became known.
Robert Christison (i 797-1 882) worked under Orfila in Paris,
and devoted much attention to methods of testing for arsenic.
He was professor of medical jurisprudence in the University
of Edinburgh until 1882, and was called as toxicological expert
at the trial of Madeleine Smith and in other famous cases.
Reinsch, who developed the test of the deposition of metallic
arsenic on a bright copper plate, published his results in 1842,
and this was followed by Marsh with his still more important
test with nascent hydrogen in 1846. Fresenius and von Babo
discovered a method for the systematic search of the organic
matter of the viscera in 1844, and in 1850 Stas published his
process by which alkaline poisons could be extracted from
the viscera.
As the science of toxicology has progressed, so the chances
of the criminal poisoner have grown smaller and smaller, till
at the present day there is a very slight chance of the arsenical
poisoner going undetected.
The story is told of a distinguished medical professor who
used to impress on his students that they should never dismiss
from their minds the possibility of murder in the case of a
96 POISON MYSTERIES
mysterious illness, however little suspicious the circumstances
might be. He used to give an illustration from his own
experience in a case where he was called in consultation by a
local practitioner, who was baffled by the illness of the wife
of a clergyman. The professor, after the consultation, asked
the husband, " Has the possibility of poisoning occurred to
you ? " "It has," was his reply, " and I have been so care-
ful to guard against it that I have actuall}/ made it a practice
to prepare my wife's food myself.'' " Then I dismiss the
thought," replied the doctor, " but as I have already taken a
sample of the food in the bedroom, I may as well have it
analysed as a matter of form." The clergyman thanked the
physician for his scrupulous care, the latter returned to Lon-
don, and the former shot himself. According to the story,
the truth of which is not vouched for, the wife recovered and
erected a memorial to her husband in the parish church.
Mercury, one of the most fascinating of all the elements,
has traditions that carry it back to an unknown period of
antiquity. In the form of sulphide it is recorded in the
Papyrus Ebers (1550 B.C.) as being used by the ancient
Egyptians, but it is said to have been known at an even
earlier date in the form of quicksilver in China and India.
The metal was probably named after the Roman divinity
Mercury on account of its volatile nature and its elusive
properties when handled. It has the peculiar property of
absorbing other metals and forming amalgams. As well as
being found native, it was obtained by the ancients by sub-
limation from cinnabar the oxide. By the alchemists it was
represented by the same sign as the planet Mercury. It is
alluded to by Theophrastus in the fourth century B.C., but it
is to Dioscorides in the first century a.d. it owes the name of
hydrargyrum or fluid silver.
For a long time the liquid metal was believed to bp poison-
ous and the native quicksilver was thought to be different
from hydrargyrum obtained from the sulphide. Berthelot has
shown that the protochloride of mercury was prepared and
known as far back as the time of Democritus in the fifth
century B.C. In 1386 Chaucer alludes to it as " quick-silver
yclept mercuric."
The Arabs, who doubtless derived their knowledge of the
SOME CLASSICAL POISONS 97
metal from the Greeks, v/ere much attracted by it, and Geber
describes perchloride of mercury, also the red oxide from
which Priestley afterwards prepared oxygen. Avicenna, the
Arab physician, was the first to doubt the poisonous properties
of the metal itself, and noted that many persons swallowed
it without any ill effects, as it passed through the body
unchanged. Fallopius (1523-1562) records that shepherds
gave quicksilver in his time to sheep and cattle to expel worms,
and Brassavola (1500-1555) says that he had given it to
children in doses from two to twenty grains for the expulsion
of worms.
About 1497 it was first used in the treatment of syphilis,
in the form of inunction, plasters and fumigation. Beringario
de Carpi of Bologna, who lived in the early part of the
sixteenth century, is said to have made large sums of money
from his treatment of syphilis by inunction with mercurial
ointment. John Vigo advised fumigation in obstinate cases.
The first to record its use internally was Peter Matthiolus,
the commentator of Dioscorides (1501-1577). Paracelsus
popularized its use, and since the sixteenth century mercury
has come to be recognized as a valuable medicine throughout
the world.
Robert Boyle, who was born in 1627, and is regarded as
the father of chemistry in Great Britain, commenced his
experiments in a little laboratory in Oxford in 1653. He
afterwards founded the Royal Society, and used to make the
oxide by heating mercury in a bottle fitted with a stopper
provided with a narrow tube by which air was admitted.
The product was known as " Boyle's Hell," on account
of the belief that it caused the metal to suffer extreme
agonies.
The many ways in which mercury can be transformed and the
numerous products which can be made from it, have had a fasci-
nation TOr chemists throughout the ages. Homberg (c. 1675),
a German chemist, found that by putting a little mercury into
a bottle and attaching it to the wheel of a mill that the metal
was turned into a blackish powder (protoxide). It is to Sir
Theodore Turquet de Mayerne that we owe the popularity of
calomel, another product of mercury, for medicinal purposes.
Mayerne was the favourite physician of Henry IV of P>ance,
G
98 POISON MYSTERIES
but being compelled to leave Paris, he settled in London and
served in the same capacity to James I and Charles I.
Mercury has been credited with certain occult properties,
and in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries it was a
common practice in London to carry in the pocket a quill
filled with quicksilver and sealed at the end, as a protection
against rheumatism. This superstition has survived to the
present day, and in some chemists' shops in the City little
glass tubes containing mercury, sealed and placed in wash-
leather bags, are still sold, and carried in the belief that
they will ward off attacks of rheumatism while the phial
is on the person.
Antimony has played an important part, both in medicine
and chemistry, from a very early period. Known to the
ancients as " stibium " or " stimmi," the native sulphide was
used by women in Egypt and in the East over three thousand
years ago, for darkening the eyebrows and eyelids. Arab
women still use it in the form of "kohl," finely ground for
making lines between the eyelids, which they regard as an aid
to beauty. It was a favourite metal with the alchemists,
who hoped to obtain from it a remedy for all ills. They soon
discovered how readily it formed alloys with other metals,
and found it a simple matter to make salts of the metal.
They knew that by simply heating crude antimony in a
crucible they would sometimes get a vitreous substance, in
consequence of some of the silica of the crucible combining
with the antimony. They found that by digesting it in wine,
the tartar of the wine formed a tartrate of antimony, and by
other processes they got various salts which they discovered
had medicinal properties.
The white oxychloride which was called " Algaroth's powder "
or the " mercury of life " was one of the most popular emetics
in the sixteenth century ; it was introduced by Victor Algar-
otti, a physician of Verona. Another celebrated jMtimony
compound was Kermes Mineral, which is said to have been
discovered by Glauber about 1651. The process for making
this orange-red powder was kept secret, and wonderful cures
are declared to have been effected by it.
In the seventeenth century it was probably one of the
most popular remedies in France for ague, dropsy, smallpox.
SOME CLASSICAL POISONS 99
syphilis and other diseases. Louis XV bought the formula
for its preparation for a considerable sum in 1720 from La
Ligerie.
In the early part of the seventeenth century, Mynsicht is
said to have re-discovered the properties of tartar emetic,
which has probably been more frequently used in medicine
than any other salt of antimony. It was regarded at one time
as a specific for fevers, but used more especially for its emetic
properties.
In the sixteenth a.nd seventeenth centuries cups were made
of an alloy of antimony and tin, called " antimony cups "
{pocida emeticj). The cup was filled with wine, which was
allowed to stand in it for some little time and become slightly
impregnated with tartar emetic, so that the liquid when
drunk produced vomiting. These cups were frequently found
in monasteries, where it is said they were kept in order that the
monks who took too much wine could be punished by having
to drink some more which had been kept in the poculum
emeticum.
In the seventeenth century Basil Valentine, a German
monk, whose identity is still a matter of dispute, published
a work entitled the " Triumphal Chariot of Antimony," in
which he describes its virtues as a remedy, and the forms in
which it could be prescribed. It was translated into English
and published in London in 1678.
Antimony has several times been employed as a poison
for criminal purposes, and the cases of Dr. Pritchard and
Chapman or Klosowski, who used it, are described in later
chapters.
A curious case, which shows how by accidental means a
poison may find its way into human remains after death, came
to light some months ago in Yorkshire. After the death of a
young man, who was certified to have died of gastrc-enteritis,
his friefts found that they could not obtain an order to
cremate the body until a partial post-mortem examination
had been made. This was done and a small quantity of
antimonious oxide was found, which was supposed to have
contributed to the cause of death.
A further examination was therefore ordered, and the
organs of the body were sent to the Home Office analyst. He
100 POISON MYSTERIES
found that these were entirely free from antimony, but he dis-
covered that antimonious oxide was present in the rubber rings
of old pickle jars which had been used to send the remains to
London for examination. From this source the organs had
become contaminated and the certificate that death resulted
from natural causes was confirmed.
It is probable that in this case if the analyst had not
found antimony present in the rubber bands of the stoppers
of the glass jars— which of course should not have been used
— it might have been declared that the man had died from
the effects of antimonial poisoning, as presumably he had
been actually taking antimony in the form of medicine and
the result would have been another unsolved poison mystery.
One of the peculiarities of antimony when given in large
doses is its property of preserving the tissues of the body
after death. In the Klosowski case the body of one of his
victims, whom he had poisoned with antimony, was exhumed
after five years, and was found to be completely mummified
and as well preserved as if it had only been buried a few days.
CHAPTER VIII
ROYAL AND HISTORIC POISONERS
POISON appears to have been employed as a political
agent from an early period of history, and many
stories, probably more legendary than correct, have been
handed down of royal personages who used this secret and
deadly method of ridding themselves of troublesome indi-
viduals and removing enemies from their path. In the same
way, they themselves sometimes became the victims of jealous
rivals by similar nefarious means. The greatest craft and
cunning were exerted in order to introduce poison into the
human body, and there are many stories concerning the curious
and subtle methods said to have been employed.
There are but few authenticated records of the use of poison
in England for the purpose of taking life until the sixteenth
century, although according to tradition King John is said to
have compassed the death of the unfortunate Maud Fitz-
Walter by m.eans of a poisoned egg.
The story is a romantic one, and is related by Hep\yorth
Dixon in Her Majesty's Tower. In the reign of King John
the White Tower received one of the first and fairest of a long
line of female victims, in the person of Maud FitzWalter, who
was known to the singers of her time as Maud the Fair. The
father of this beautiful girl was Robert, Lord FitzWalter, of
Castle Baynard on the Thames, one of John's most powerful
and greatest barons. The King, it is said, during a fit of
violence or temper with the Queen, fell madly in love with
the fair Maud. As neither the lady herself nor her father
would listen to his disgraceful suit, the King is said to
have seized her by force at Dunmow and brought her to the
Tower. FitzWalter raised an outcry, on which the King
sent troops into Castle Baynard and his other houses, and
101
102 POISON MYSTERIES
when the baron protested against these wrongs his master
banished him from the realm. FitzWalter fled to France
with his wife and other children, leaving poor Maud in the
Tower, where she suffered a daily insult in the King's unlawful
suit. She remained obdurate, however, and refused his offers.
On her proud and scornful answer to his overtures being
heard, John carried her up to the roof and locked her in the
round turret, standing on the north-east angle of the keep.
Maud's cage was the highest and chilliest den in the Tower,
but neither cold, solitude nor hunger could break her resolve,
and at last, in a rage of disappointed love, the King sent
one of his minions to her room with a poisoned egg, of which
the brave girl ate and died.
According to the French Chronicles, " After the death of
Gaultier Giffard, Count Buckingham, in the early part of the
twelfth century, Agnes his widow became enamoured with
Robert Duke of Normandy, and attached herself to him in an
illicit manner, shortly after which time his wife Sibylle died
of poison."
Probably the earliest recorded case of secret poisoning in
England is that of Sir Walter de Scotiney, who was convicted
of poisoning the Abbot of Westminster and William, brother
of the Earl of Gloucester. According to Leland's account,
this happened during the meeting of a parliament which had
been convened at Winchester by Henry the Third about 1230.
The story is told in the following words : —
" The Abbot of Westminster and William brother of the
Earl of Gloucester, a person of great worth and spirit, were
both destroyed. The Earl of Gloucester himself languished
under the effects of the poison and only escaped death with
extreme difficulty, for the hair fell from his head and the nails
from his fingers. They are said to have received into their
bowels the deadly drug at the table of the Lord Edward, King
Henry's eldest son, during breakfast. The Earl escaped
destruction merely by the strength of his constitution with
the loss of his hair, nails, skin and great injury to his teeth.
These atrocious deeds struck the people with Horror. The
villainy was imputed to a certain knight, Walter de Scotiney,
and at the appeal of the Countess de LTsle he was seized,
judged and drawn/'
ROYAL AND HISTORIC POISONERS 103
"In the same year and the latter end of February," the
chronicler continues,
" was apprehended at London Walter de Scotiney, the Chief
Councillor of the Earl of Gloucester and his seneschall, being
suspected of having given the poisonous potion to the Earl,
who was himself hardly saved from the gate of death, and to
his brother William de Clare who was really killed by it ; also
was taken William de Bussey whose villanies if related must
excite horror and astonishment. He was the seneschal and
principal councillor of William de Valence. These men,
although they had been under the safe custody of sureties,
being now seized and brought before the judges were com-
mitted to a viler prison and put in chains."
In the records of LIugh de Bigot, the High Justiciar, it is
stated :
" Coming to Winchester they brought Walter de Scotiney
steward of the Earl of Gloucester to his trial for poisoning
William de Clare the preceding year. Scotiney was con-
victed, condemned and executed."
Henry VIII at one period of his life was apprehensive of
being poisoned, and it was commonly stated that Anne
Boleyn attempted to administer poison to him surreptitiously.
It is recorded that the King, in an interview with young Prince
Henry, burst into tears, saying that "he and his sister, the
Princess Mary, might thank God for having escaped from the
hand of that accursed and venomous harlot, who had intended
to poison them."
The story of the Countess of Somerset, who was tried with
others for the murder of Sir Thomas Overbury in the reign
of James I, forms an interesting episode in the history of
romantic poisoning. Robert Earl of Essex, son of Queen
Elizabeth's favourite, and who afterwards became Com-
mander-in-Chief of the Parliamentary forces, married, at the
age of fourteen, Frances Howard, a younger daughter of the
Earl of Suffolk, the bride being just a year younger than her
husband. The match had been arranged and brought about
through the influence of relatives, who thought it expedient
that the youthful bridegroom should be sent off to travel on
the Continent immediately after the marriage had taken
104 POISON MYSTERIES
place, and he remained away for three or four years. During
this period the countess, who was brought up at Court, deve-
loped into a very beautiful woman, but seems to have been
equally unprincipled and capricious. On the return of the
earl from his travels, she shrank from all advances on his part,
and showed the utmost repugnance to her husband on all
occasions. Their dispositions were entirely different. He
loved retirement, and wished to live a quiet country life,
while she, who had been bred at Court, and accustomed to
adulation and intrigue, refused to leave town. The King
about this time had a number of young men of distinguished
appearance and good looks attached to the Court, and of
these, one Robert Carr, at length became an exclusive favour-
ite. Between him and the self-willed young countess there
sprang up an attachment, which, at least on her side, amounted
to infatuation. Her opportunities for meeting her lover
were short and rare, and in this emergency she applied to a
Mrs. Turner, who introduced her to Dr. Form.an, a noted
astrologer and magician at that time, and he, by images made
of wax and other devices of the black art, undertook to pro-
cure the love of Carr for the lady. At the same time he was
also to practise against the earl in the opposite direction.
These measures, however, were too slow for the wayward
countess, and having gone to the utmost lengths with her
inamorato, she insisted on a divorce from her husband, and
a legal marriage with her lover.
One of Carr's greatest friends was Sir Thomas Overbury,
a young courtier and a man of honour and kindly disposition.
He was much against this intimacy, and besought his friend
to break it off, assuring him it would ruin his prospects and
reputation if he married the lady. Carr unwisely made this
known to the countess, who at once regarded Overbury as
a bitter enemy, and resolved to do what she could to over-
throw him. The pair plotted together with evident success,
for the unfortunate Sir Thomas was shortly afterwards com-
mitted to the Tower by an arbitrary mandate of the King,
and was not allowed to see any visitors. Finally, his
food was poisoned, and, after several unsuccessful attempts
on his life, he at last died from the effects of poison. Canthar-
ides, nitrate of silver, spiders, arsenic, and last of all, corrosive
ROYAL AND HISTORIC POISONERS 105
sublimate, are said to have been administered in turn to this
unfortunate individual. Meanwhile, the countess obtained
a divorce from her husband on the ground of impotency,
and married Carr, who was soon after made Earl of Somerset
by King James.
Two years elapsed before the murder of Sir Thomas Over-
bury was brought to light, when the inferior criminals, Mrs.
Turner and others, were convicted and executed ; but the
Earl of Somerset and his countess, although found guilty
with their accomplices, received the royal pardon. The
happiness of the earl and countess, however, was not of long
duration, as it is stated they afterwards became so alienated
from each other, that they resided for years under the same
roof with the most careful precautions that they might
not by any chance come into each other's presence. Mrs.
Turner, implicated in the crime, is said to have been the first
to introduce into England the yellow starch that was then
applied to ladies' ruffs. Her last request was that she should
be hanged in a ruff dyed with her own yellow starch, and
her wish is said to have been carried out.
Whether Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, Prime Minister
and favourite of Queen Elizabeth, was as black as he is painted
by some of the historians of his time, it is difficult to judge.
His ambition to marry his royal mistress, who, shrewd woman
as she was, appears to have had no insight into his unscrupu-
lous character, was apparently the cause of his attempting
to move every human obstacle from his path by insidious
methods. The death of Amy Robsart, a mystery which has
never been completely solved and a description of which is
given in a following chapter, is attributed to Leicester's
machinations. He was suspected of causing the death of
Lord Sheffield, and the Earl of Essex, another rival, is stated
to have been also the victim of his hatred.
The death of the latter peer is said, in the language of a con-
temporary chronicler, as having been due to "an extreme
flux cause by an Italian Receit, the maker whereof was a
surgeon that was then newly come to my Lord from Italy, a
cunning man and sure in operation." The inventor of this
recipe was known as Dr. Julio, who was said to be able " to
make a man dye in what manner of sickness you will." Essex
io6 POISON MYSTERIES
died when on his way back to England from Ireland, with the
object, it is said, of revenging himself on Leicester for his
domestic wrongs. " With the Earl of Essex, one Mrs. Alice
Drakott, a godly gentlewoman, is also said to have been
poisoned." This lady happened to be accompanying the
earl on her w^y towards her own house, when after partaking
of the same cup she was also seized with violent pain and
vomiting, which continued until she died, a day or two before
the earl succumbed. " When she was dead," says the chron-
icler, " her body was swollen into a monstruous bigness and
deformity ; whereof the good earl, hearing the day following,
lamented the case greatly, and said in the presence of his
servants, ' Ah ! poor Alice, the cup was not prepared for thee,
albeit it was thy hard fortune to taste thereof.' "
According to all accounts, Leicester's list of victims did
not cease here, and, rightly or wrongly, the death of Cardinal
Chatillian, who was taken suddenly ill and died in Canterbury,-
is also attributed to him. The Cardinal had accused the
earl of preventing the marriage of the Queen to the King of
France, and was journeying back to Dover when he was taken
ill and died in a mysterious manner.
Another mysterious death at this time that occasioned con-
siderable sensation was that of Sir Nicholas Throgmorton,
a wealthy city magnate of Elizabeth's time, whose name:
is still perpetuated in the City. Sir Nicholas is said to
have been an associate of Leicester's and the one who was
ready to do his bidding in thwarting the doings of the Lord
Treasurer, Sir William Cecil, who was thought by Leicester to
be playing him false. He invited him one night to a supper at
his house in London, and, just as the meal was served, hurriedly
left for Court, to which he said he had been called suddenly
by her Majesty. Sir Nicholas was told to proceed with the
meal in his absence, which he did, but soon after was seized
with violent vomiting, from which he never recovered. The
story continues, that the day before his death he declared to a
dear friend " all the circumstances and causes of his com-
plaint, which he affirmed plainly to be poison given him in a
sallet at supper, inveighing most earnestly against the earl's
cruelty and bloody disposition, and affirming him to be the
wickedest, most perilous and perfidious man under heaven."
ROYAL AND HISTORIC POISONERS 107
Whether Leicester was the unscrupulous villain he was
made out to be or not, there is no evidence to prove. Many
writers aver that he kept his professional poisoners ready to do
his will and carry out his designs. There seems little doubt
that he had some needy physicians in his pay. His personal
doctor, one Bayly, is said to have boasted of the fact that
" he knew of poisons which might be so tempered that they
should kill the party afterwards at what time it should be
appointed." This method, which is alluded to by many
writers of the fifteenth century as slow poisoning, was probably
due to the effect of administering some poison, such as arsenic
or antimony in small doses until the cumulative effect of the
substance proved fatal.
An Italian doctor whom Leicester brought home from his
travels in Italy, is mentioned in several stories as one of the
unscrupulous physicians employed by him who were ready
to administer the " Italian Comfortive," as the poison was
called, at his bidding. Those whose sudden deaths were
attributed to Leicester's instrumentality were commonly said
to have succumbed to " Leicester's cold."
There is little doubt, however, that Leicester was suspected
of being the instigator of many murders which probably he
may have had nothing to do with, as he made many enemies.
His name is also associated with the sudden demise of
Lord Sheffield, whose death is said to have been due to " Leices-
ter's cold." A short time afterwards the earl married his
widow, but under pretence that the Queen would be offended
at the marriage, compelled her to keep it secret. After some
time, the more effectually to conceal the connection, he
required her to marry Sir Edward Stafford. This she refused
to do, till under the gentle discipline of Leicester it is recorded
that " her hair fell off and her nails fell out, and she did what
was demanded of her to save her life." This story is certified
by her own testimony on oath, and recorded by Sir William
Dugdale.
The Earl of Sussex, his great rival, is also said to have been
one of his victims. On his death-bed he is said to have warned
his friends in the following words : "I am passing into
another world and must now leave you to your good fortunes
and to the Queen's grace and goodness ; but beware of the
io8 POISON MYSTERIES
gipsy's son [Leicester] for he will be too hard for you all.
You know the beast as well as I do."
Camden, the historian, who does not discredit many of
these stories, asserts that Leicester actually proposed in
Council that Mary Queen of Scots should be removed by poison.
There was a curious mystery about the death of Prince
Alexander, the son of Peter the Great, the story of which is
related by Henry Bruce, an Englishman in Peter's service in
1782. Bruce states that he was at the citadel of St. Peter and
St. Paul, where the Tsarevitch was imprisoned on a charge
oilesc-majeste, the Tsar and Marshal Veide being also present.
The latter ordered Bruce to go to the apothecary Beer, who
lived close by, and tell him " the potion must be made strong,
for the Prince was very bad indeed." The apothecary trem-
bled and turned pale at the message, but refused to explain
to Bruce why he was thus agitated. The Marshal, who had
sent Bruce, followed him, and told Beer to " hurry, for the
Prince had had an apoplectic fit." The apothecary handed
him a silver cup, which the Marshal carried to the Prince,
" staggering all the time like a drunken man." Half an hour
after the Tsar left the citadel, gloomy, like all his retinue.
Bruce was ordered to stay and dine at a table set for the
Tsarevitch. " Two doctors and two surgeons dined apart.
They were called in to the Prince ; he was in convulsions,
and died at 5 p.m., after atrocious suffering. Bruce informed
the Marshal, who told the Tsar. The viscera were removed
by Peter the Great's orders before the body was coffined."
In India, when powdered glass is employed for lethal pur-
poses, it is generally given with sherbet or some kind of
food. It acts as a powerful irritant to the coats of the
stomach or intestines and produces gastro-enteritis.
A celebrated case in which this substance was used occurred in
India in 1874, when the Gaekwar or reigning prince of Baroda,
was tried for attempting to kill the British political resident.
Colonel Phayre, by administering powdered glass to him in
sherbet. He was brought to trial before a court composed
of three Indian and three English judges, and after a trial
lasting thirty-five days the English judges pronounced for a
conviction and the three Indian ones for an acquittal. In
the end the Gaekwar was deposed and deported to Madras.
CHAPTER IX
POISONS TRIED ON HUMAN BEINGS
FROM an early period science has been gradually built
up by experimental methods and even the ancients were
cognizant of the fact that the remedial properties of a substance
could only be proved by actual experiment. Not only animals
but human beings were utilized for this purpose by many
famous physicians in the Middle Ages. Criminals who had been
condemned to death were generally sejected when available.
It is stated by Pierre Fabre, in the History of the Apostles,
that the Apostle 'John was present at the execution of two
criminals by poison in the public forum at Ephesus.
Vivisection of the live human subject was practised by the
Alexandrian school in the time of the Ptolemies. Erasistratos
and Herophilos, pupils of Chrysippos of Cnidos, are said to
have experimented upon 600 condemned criminals handed
over to them by Ptolemy Soter. They opened the
abdomens of some of these men to study the movements
of the colon and those of the muscle of the diaphragm on
the inspiration of air ; they also opened the chests of the
others to study the cardiac movements. Their conduct,
however, met with the reprobation of their contemporaries.
Celsus and Galen reproached Herophilos with "cruel and
useless sacrifices " and of "inhuman feeling," while Tertullian
called him roundly " an executioner who gave lingering death
with refined cruelty." The Court physicians of Attalus,
King of Pergamus, and Mithridates, King of Pontus, were
authorized in virtue of their ofhce to try poisons upon
criminals, and were accused by their jealous colleagues of
pluming themselves upon their privileges, while less favoured
practitioners were compelled to be content to experiment
upon cocks and dogs.
109
110 POISON MYSTERIES
An allusion to the use of animals for the purpose of
physiological experiment is to be found in a document
still preserved in the Venetian secret archives, which bears
the date 1432. It states : "Trial has been made on three
porcine animals of certain venoms found in the chancery
sent very long ago from Vicenza which have been proved not
to be good."
This document affords interesting proof that the Italians
at that early period were much in advance of other European
nations in their knowledge of poisonous substances.
Brassavola of Ferrara studied little known and doubtfiil
remedies by testing their effects on criminals, and Fallopius,
his pupil, who eventually made such important physiological
discoveries," followed his master's example. It is recorded
that Cosimo de Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany, on one occasion
ordered the magistrates of Pisa to hand over -two men to
Fallopius, " in order that he may put them to death in what-
ever way he pleases, and then anatomize them." Fallopius,
however, seeing the men "were condemned to death, seems to
have acted with both dignity and humanity. He gave them
each eight grains of opium ; one died and the other recovered.
Cosimo pardoned him, but, if we may believe contemporary
records, Fallopius did not : he gave the man eight grains more,
and this time he died.
At Bologna, poisons were habitually administered to
criminals without their knowledge to obviate the perturbing
influence of fear upon natural toxic effects. Arsenic was
employed in the same way at Mantua and Florence. Even
princes of the Church did not show themselves above taking
part in these experiments. The Cardinal- Archbishop of
Ravenna, with the permission of Duke Ercole II, tried the
effects of corrosive sublimate (!) as an antidote, though
this seems rather like cutting off a child's head to cure it of
squinting. Pope Clement VII's experiment with a secret oil
which was given to certain unfortunate Corsicans as an antidote
to the aconite they administered judicially, may be cited as
a more humane effort in the cause of science, and was, no
doubt, considered to have been partially successful, as one
of the victims survived the aconite and received a freie
pardon.
POISONS TRIED ON HUMAN BEINGS in
Dr. Harris, who was physician-in-ordinary to Charles II,
gives an account of one Pontaeus, apparently a contemporary,
who is described as the first mountebank who ever appeared
on a stage in England. This performer issued a challenge to
the physicians of Oxford to prepare the rankest poison they
could contrive, and he undertook that one of his servants
should take it and recover. Thus would he demonstrate the
marvellous virtues of the orvietan he had for sale. The
medical practitioners of Oxford accepted the challenge,
and decided on aqua fortis. Pontaeus's man drank off on
the stage what they brought him, fell down as dead, was
carried off, and reappeared the next day no worse for his
experience. Dr. Plarris explains that previous to the test
he had well greased his mouth and gullet with 2 or 3 lb. of
fresh butter, and that after getting him behind the scenes a
lot more butter was adrninistered, and then warm water,
which m.ade him sick. Another member of the charlatan's
staff next washed his hands in molten lead before the spec-
tators. Plis hands were immediately violently inflamed, and
his sufferings were obvious to the crowd, if not appreciated
by himself. Some of the professor's famous green ointment
was then applied to the almost skinless flesh, and the hands
were carefully bandaged. Next day the bandages were
removed, and the hands were scarcely even inflamed. It
transpired afterwards that the molten lead was warm quick-
silver placed in a ladle painted red, and when the man
dipped his hands in the metal he was concealing in them
some vermilion, which he rubbed over the flesh under the
quicksilver.
Fran9ois Ranchin, Professor and Chancellor of the Faculty
of Montpcllier in the eighteenth century, wrote that experi-
ments upon human beings were worthy of approval and
had been held in high honour by the ancients.
English surgeons in the eighteenth century were also willing
to avail themselves when the opportunity offered to experi-
ment on a condemned criminal.
In 1731 a man named Charles Ray was reprieved on con-
dition that William Cheselden, the famous anatomist and
surgeon, should perforate the drum of his ear in order to ascer-
tain if it would cause deafness. The unfortunate subject,
112 POISON MYSTERIES
however, was taken ill with fever before the experiment
could be performed, and the operation was abandoned.
Again, in 1763 another condemned man was offered a
reprieve on condition that he consented to have one of his
legs amputated to test the power of a new styptic. Fortun-
ately, perhaps, for him, he died before the experiment could
be performed. Four years later one John Benham is reported
to have been reprieved for a similar purpose, but when Pierce,
the inventor of the styptic, waited upon the Secretary of State
to make arrangements, he was informed that His Majesty the
King was of the opinion that it was quite improper to try
such an experiment.
In more recent times seven condemned criminals in France
were inoculated with the plague, but only one contracted the
disease, and a certain German professor inoculated a man
with carbuncle, which brought upon him the denunciations
of his professional brethren.
On the ethics of such experiments much diversity of opinion
exists, but only when the subjects voluntarily submit them-
selves, as was recently done in connection with the researches
on yellow fever, can this course be in any way justified.
CHAPTER X
THE SLOW AND TIME POISONS OF MEDIEVAL
TIMES
THE belief that certain slow and secret poisons could
be so prepared that their administration could be
controlled with such a degree of precision as to cause death
at any given period, according to the will of the poisoner,
has existed from ancient times. This idea was encouraged
and fostered by the practitioners of alchemy and astrology,
and others who professed to exercise magical powers. They
also claimed a knowledge of certain lethal bodies which
could be administered to the victims that would leave no
trace behind them.
"Truly," says a writer of the seventeenth century, " this
poisoning art called ' veneficium ' of all others is most abomin-
able, as whereby [crime] may be committed where no suspicion
may be gathered nor any resistance be made ; the strong
cannot avoid the weak ; the wise cannot prevent the foolish,
the godly cannot be preserved from the hands of the wicked ;
children may thereby kill their parents, the servant the
master, the wife her husband so privily, so uncurably that
of all other it hath been thought the most odious kind of
murther."
The origin of the time or slow poison tradition may be
found in the cunning which is usually associated with the
poisoner. In order to avoid suspicion, the poison was probably
first administered to the victim in minute quantities, then
gradually increased, from time to time, until it was finally
decided to give the lethal dose, and so the culminating time
was determined by the poisoner.
Theophrastus refers to a poison prepared from aconite
which, he states, would produce its effects after two, three or
113 H
114 POISON MYSTERIES
six months, or even years, after it had been administered.
Plutarch records that one of the PhiHps of Macedon caused
such a poison to be given to Aratus King of Sicyon, which is
said to have produced a gradual wasting of the whole body,
accompanied by bleeding from the nose.
In Italy, during the Middle Ages, the highest dignitaries of
the Church did not scruple to employ this evil method of
gaining their ends, and statesmen used it as an instrument of
diplomacy. Princes and nobles became adepts in devising
the most cunning methods of administering a lethal dose to
those whom they wished removed from their paths. This
subtle method for the destruction of human life seems to have
specially appealed to the Latin races of all classes. When
they desired to dispose of a dangerous enemy or an incon-
venient rival, they saw no distinction between using poison
and the dagger. Many notable personages are said to
have fallen victims to the poisoner's craft, including Pope
Victor II, Christopher I, King of Denmark, and Henry VII
of Germany.
With respect to the latter monarch, it is stated that on his
return from Italy, where he had made many enemies both
in Church and State, he stopped at the small town of Buon-
conventis to celebrate the festival of Easter. After receiving
the sacrament he fell suddenly ill and died in terrible agony.
The sacred elements of the Eucharist are said indeed to have
been often utilized as a medium for this evil purpose. A case
occurred within recent years when the same method was
employed, proving that even to-day, in some remote parts of
Italy, the old craft of the poisoner still survives. A few
years ago, an aged priest named Donato Marulli, while cele-
brating mass in his church in the village of Villamagua in
Abruzzi, fell writhing in agony on the altar steps. Consterna-
tion ensued among the congregation present, who crowded
round the sacristan demanding explanations. Hearing sus-
picions of poisoning mentioned, he seized the chalice and
drained the contents to demonstrate that the priest's seizure
was not due to the consecrated cup, but in a few moments he
collapsed in the same manner. Suspicion afterwards fell on a
young priest, who was subsequently arrested. It was found
"TIME POISONS" OF MEDIEVAL TIMES 115
that he had mixed corrosive sublimate with the wine just
before the celebration, the motive being to get promoted as
parish priest in the old man's stead.
The extent to which the belief in the extraordinary power
of poisons grew is instanced in the story of an association of
women that flourished at Cassalis in Italy in the year 1536.
The members are said to have poisoned whole families by
" smearing the posts and doors of their houses with a noxious
ointment and powder of which they prepared about forty
crocks for the purpose. The like villainy was practised at
Genoa and execution was done upon the offenders. Their
art consisted in poisoning cattle as well as men, for it is
written by divers authors that if wolves' dung be hidden in
the mangers, racks, or else in the hedges about the pastures
where cattle go (through the antipathy of the nature of the
wolfe and other cattle) all the beasts that favour the same do
not only forbear to eat but run about as though they were
mad."
It need hardly be said that this story is simply a phase
of the witchcraft superstition so commonly believed at this
period.
On carefully investigating the cases recorded of so-called
secret and slow poisonings mentioned by writers of the Middle
Ages, the substance employed in the majority of such cases
was probably arsenic in some form. La Spara's mysterious
elixir, that was the cause of so many deaths in Rome in the
seventeenth century, was a preparation of arsenic, and so also
was the famous Aqua Toffana, which is said to have put an
end to no less than six hundred persons. It is very improb-
able that any substances of a toxic nature were used in
mediaeval or earlier times that are unknown to science to-day,
and most of the stories of slow and secret poisoning can be
explained by the manner in which the poison was given. A
common phrase used by historians of this period in closing
the account of some personages of note was, " he died not
without suspicion of venom."
According to the Burghley papers, there was great dread of
secret poisoning in Queen Elizabeth's time.
On June 27, 1572, one Richard Bexley, writing to Burghley,
advises him not to take any physic of Dr. Gyfford, recently
ii6 POISON MYSTERIES
from Rome, lest he might be " Italianated " (a phrase actually
coined to express secret poisoning). As early as 1561 it
became necessary to surround the Queen with precautions
against poisons. Not an untasted dish was allowed to be
brought to her table, not a glove or a handkerchief might
approach her person which had not been scrutinized, and she
was dosed weekly with antidotes.
Another story which shows the extraordinary credulity
respecting the power of poisons that existed in the sixteenth
century is related in a rare tract published in 1652, that pur-
ports to be an account of an attempt on the life of Queen
Elizabeth. It states, in " Anno Dom. 1596 one Edward Squire
sometime a scrivener at Greenwich, afterwards a deputy
purveyor for the Queen's stable, in Sir Francis Drake's last
voyage was taken prisoner and carried into Spaine, and being
set at liberty, one Walpole a Jesuite grew acquainted with
him and got him into the Inquisition whence he returned a
resolved Papist, he persuaded Squire to undertake to poyson
the pommell of the Queen's [Elizabeth's] saddle, and, to
make him constant, made Squire receive the Sacrament upon
it ; he then gave him the poyson chusing that he should take
it in a double bladder and should prick the bladder full of
hoales in the upper part, when he should use it (carrying it
within a thick glove for the safety of his hand) should after
turne it downward pressing the bladder upon the pommell of
the Queen's saddle. This Squire contest. Squire is now in
Spaine, and for his safer dispatch it was devised that two
Spanish prisoners taken at Cales should be exchanged for
Squire and one Rawles, that it might not be thought that
Squire came over but as a redeemed captive.
" The Munday sennight after Squire returned into England,
he understanding the horses were preparing for the Queen's
riding abroad laid his hand and crushed the poyson upon the
pommell of the Queene's saddle saying, ' God save the
Queene,' the Queene road abroad and as it should seem laid
her hand upon the place or els received no hurt (through God's
goodness) by touching it. Walpole counting the thing as
done, imparted it to some principall fugitives there, but being
disappointed of his hope, supposing Squire to have been false,
to be revenged on him sent one hither (who should pretend
"TIME POISONS" OF MEDIEVAL TIMES 117
to have stolne from thence) with letters wherein the plot of
Squire was contained ; this letter was pretended to be stolne
out of one of their studies.
" Squire being apprehended confessed all without any rigor,
but after denied that he put it into execution, although he
acknowledged he consented to it in the plot, at length he
confessed the putting it in execution also."
The death of Niccolo Macchiavelli, whose abbreviated Chris-
tian name according to Macaulay was the origin of the term
" Old Nick " commonly applied to the universal enemy of
mankind, is said to have been due to a magic potion. Henry
Morley, however, gives another version, and states that,
" having failed in health after his last reverses, Macchiavelli
increased his ailment by an overdose of castor oil, a medicine
then in particular repute, and died two days afterwards on
June 22, 1527."
This statement is evidently an error, as castor oil (the oil
expressed from the seeds of the Ricinis communis) was not in
use as a medicinal agent until more than 200 years after
Macchiavelli's death. The drug that Macchiavelli may have
taken is the oil of castor, a product of the animal of that
name which was often used in the fifteenth and sixteenth
centuries. An interesting light is thrown on the composition
of the so-called magic potion in a letter written by him to his
friend Guicciardini on August 17, 1525, nearly two years
before his death. He states :
" I send you twenty-five pills made for you already four
days since ; you will find the receipt for them at the end of
my letter. I tell you they have resuscitated me. Begin by
taking one after supper ; if it has any effect you will cease ;
if not, you will take two or three, but not beyond five. As
for myself, two have always sufficed, and that only once a
week, except when my head is heavy or my stomach loaded.
. . . But let us return to the receipt for the pills : —
Aloes ....... drachm ij
Carman, deos ? (Cardamom sem.]
Saffron
Myrrh
Betony
Pipinella
Armenian bole
I
i
ii8 ^ POISON MYSTERIES
Such was the medicine of which MacchiaveUi ordinarily
made use, and which Paul Jove entitles an enchanted potion,
saying that MacchiaveUi, after having taken it, died mocking
God, and pretending that he was, so to speak, become immortal.
These pills are a strong purgative taken in the dose pre-
scribed, and it is possible MacchiaveUi, while in a weakened
condition, may have overdosed himself with them, and so
hastened his end.
Elisabetta Sirani, one of the famous women painters
of the Bolognese school in the seventeenth century, is sup-
posed to have been poisoned by her maid, and an inter-
esting account of her illness and death is recorded in a
manuscript in the Archives of Bologna. It states, that,
" In Lent 1665, she was seized with pains in her stomach.
She grew thin and lost her colour so that every one
wondered at it, for before she was healthy and robust. In
the summer, about St. Bartholomew's Day, a redness with a
little swelling appeared under her chin and jaw. These were
cured with an ointment in a few days. On August 12 or 13
she was again seized with pain which was worse after eating.
Pier sister was in bed stricken with fever and the family
physician Doctor Gallerati was attending her. Elisabetta
complained to him. He said, ' it was no time to take medicine
for the Sun was in Leo and that the pain was due to a little
catarrh.' Pie advised her to take a little acid syrup early in
the morning. Pier aunt made the syrup and she took it two
or three times, four teaspoonsful for a dose and seemed
relieved.
" But the pains returned. Nevertheless, she went with her
mother on August 24 to the Feast of the Porchetta, and when
asked how she was, said she 'was all right when she didn't
think about it.' On August 27 about two in the afternoon
the pain returned with violence. She became ghastly and was
bathed in cold perspiration. Her aunt with difficulty put her
to bed. She could not lie flat, but was easier in a half sitting
posture.
" She felt sick, but the emetics and clysters given had little
effect. All through the night her relations applied hot cloths
to her cold body. The pain continued and the extremities
turned black.
"TIME POISONS" OF MEDIiEVAL TIMES 119
"A little while before her death the pain seemed to lessen
and go lower ; she began to move in bed, then fainted and
died about eleven o'clock after being ill about thirty-three
hours. After death her body swelled. The nose thickened,
the features changed. She looked like a woman of sixty
albeit she was but twenty-six years of age. She was given by
her relatives : i, Teriaca ; ^ 2, Spetie di Elescoff in broth ;
3, Bezoar and oil of the Grand Duke against poison."
At her father's urgent request a post-mortem examination
was made the day following Elisabetta's death ! This, it is
recorded, was carried out by Master Ludovico, Surgeon of
the Ospedale della Morte, in the presence of six other phy-
sicians. Perforations were found in the stomach, which five
out of the seven doctors, attributed to the action of a " cor-
rosive poison." A Doctor Fabri introduced his finger into
one of these perforations and found the circumference was
surrounded by hardened tissue, and Dr. Gallerati, the family
physician who had attended her, was of the opinion there was
evidence of a "corrosive poison."
Suspicion fell upon a maidservant called Lucia Tolomelli,
on the assertion of another domestic, that she had seen her
place a " brown powder " in some food. So Lucia was
arrested on September i, 1665, and charged with the murder
of Elisabetta Sirani. After a protracted trial, the evidence
was deemed insufficient and she was released, it being con-
cluded that death had been due to natural causes.
There seems little doubt that this conclusion was correct,
and this gifted lady probably died from peritonitis.
In this case, as in many others where the physician was
unable to diagnose the disease and was puzzled to account
for a patient's death, it was generally deemed to be the result
of a slow poison, which deduction formed a ready solution
of the difficulty.
1 A purgative electuary composed of scammony, cream of tartar
and salt of tartar.
CHAPTER XI
THE ITALIAN SCHOOL OF POISONERS
THE study of the criminal methods of using poisons
developed into a cult in Italy during the Middle Ages,
and the Italian school of poisoners became known throughout
Europe. There is authentic record that its members were
ready on receipt of certain fees to carry out murder by poison
to order.
A document drawn up by Charles King of Navarre throws
some light on the systematic manner in which the poisoning
of obnoxious persons was carried out. It is in the form
of a commission to one Wondreton to poison Charles VI,
the Duke of Valois, brother of the King, and his uncles,
the Dukes of Berri, Burgundy and Bourbon. It reads :
" Go thou to Paris ; thou canst do great service if thou
wilt. Do what I tell thee ; I will reward thee well. There
is a thing which is called sublimed arsenic ; if a man eat a
bit the size of a pea, he will never survive ; Thou wilt find it
in Pampeluna, Bordeaux, Bayonne, and in all the good towns
thou wilt pass at the apothecaries' shops. Take it, and
powder it ; and when thou shalt be in the house of the King,
of the Count de Valois his brother, and the Dukes of Berri,
Burgundy and Bourbon, draw near and betake thyself to
the kitchen, to the larder, to the cellar, or any other place
where thy point can best be gained, and put the powder in
the soups, meats, or wines ; provided that thou canst do it
secretly. Otherwise do it not."
It is satisfactory to learn that the miscreant who was
entrusted with this diabolical commission was detected in
time, and executed in 1384.
From the fifteenth to the seventeenth century there were
schools of poisoners both in Venice and Rome. The Venetian
120
THE ITALIAN SCHOOL OF POISONERS 121
poisoners who first came into notoriety began their operations
early in the sixteenth century. At that period the mania for
poisoning had risen to such a degree that the governments of
the States were formally recognizing secret assassination by
poison, and considering the removal of emperors, princes and
powerful nobles by this method. This is not a myth, as record
of the notorious Council of Ten, which met to consider such
plans, and an account of their proceedings still exists. It
gives the number of those who voted for and who voted
against the proposed removal of certain persons, the reasons
for their assassination and the sums paid for their execution.
Thus these conspirators quietly and secretly arranged to take
the lives of many prominent individuals who displeased them.
When the deed was executed it was registered on the margin
of their official record by the significant word " Factum."
On December 15, 1543, John of Ragusa, a Franciscan
brother, offered the Council a selection of poisons, and declared
himself ready to remove any person whom they deemed
objectionable out of the way. Fie openly stated his terms,
which for the first successful case were to be a pension of 1,500
ducats a year, to be increased on the execution of future
services. The Presidents, Guolando Duoda and Pietro
Guiarini, placed this matter before the Council on January 4,
1544, and on a division it was resolved to accept this patriotic
offer, and to experiment first on the Emperor Maximilian.
John, who had evidently reduced poisoning to a fine art,
submitted afterwards a regular graduated tariff to the Council,
which reads as follows : ■ —
For the great Sultan," 500 ducats.
For the King of Spain, 150 ducats, including the expenses
of the journey, etc.
For the Duke of Milan, 60 ducats.
For the Marquis of Mantua, 50 ducats.
For the Pope, 100 ducats.
He further adds at the foot of the document, " The farther
the journey, the more eminent the man, the more it is neces-
sary to reward the toil and hardships undertaken, and the
heavier must be the payment."
What may be called the Roman school of poisoners became
prominent in the early sixteenth century, and their operations
122 POISON MYSTERIES
continued until the early part of the eighteenth century.
During this period the magnitude and daring of their crimes
struck terror into the hearts of the chief nobles and rulers of
the country. The books on what were called "secrets," pub-
lished in Italy about this time, which contain formulae of
various descriptions, contain many allusions to poisons.
Stories are told of poisons supposed to be unknown, whose
secrets died with their originators.
The mania for poisoning appears to have seized on all
classes from the highest to the lowest, and no one who made
an enemj^ was safe. Baptiste Porta, who wrote a book on
the subject in 1589, made a careful study of the subject, and
describes methods which were no doubt used in his time.
He mentions various means for drugging wine, a favourite
medium for administering poison. For this purpose bella-
donna root, nux vomica, aconite and hellebore were employed,
all of which are very deadly in their effects. He gives a
formula for compounding what he calls a very strong poison
named " Venenum Lupinum," which was composed of
aconite, taxus baccata, caustic lime, arsenic, bitter almonds
and powdered glass. These substances were to be mixed
with honey into a stiff paste and made into pills the size of
hazel nut. His method of poisoning a sleeping person was
to make a mixture of hemlock juice, bruised stramonium,
belladonna and opium, which was to be placed in a leaden
box with a perfectly fitting lid, and allowed to ferment for
several days. When this was done it was to be uncovered and
placed under the nose of the intended victim while asleep. So
long as the individual only smelt and did not swallow the
compound, it could not have done him much harm.
During the early part of the seventeenth'century the southern
parts of Italy, including Sicily, also appear to have been
infested by unscrupulous practitioners in the use of poison,
and Naples became a centre for this nefarious trade. The
rnost notorious of these criminals whose name has been
left on record is the woman named Toffana, who, there is
little doubt, was responsible indirectly for the deaths of
hundreds of people. About 1650, when she was little more
than a girl, she began her evil career in Palermo, but in 1659,
during the pontificate of Alexander VII, she removed to Naples
THE ITALIAN SCHOOL OF POISONERS 123
and made it the centre of her operations. Whether she
herself devised the poison which is associated with her name,
or whether she obtained the knowledge from a confederate,
is not known, but her method was to prepare the solution and
bottle it in special phials bearing the representation of some
saint, generally Saint Nicholas of Bari, who was connected wiih
a medicinal spring, the water of which had a reputation for
healing. Sometimes she used other names for her poisonous
solution, such as " Aquetta di Napoli," " Manna of St. Nicholas
Copyright.
A BOTTLE WITH REPRESENTATION OF
ST. NICHOLA3 OF BARI SAID TO HAVE
BEEN USED FOR AQUA TOFFANA.
di Bari, ' ' or gave her own name to it, ' ' Aqua Toffana. ' ' These
bottles of poison were freely sold, especially to women, reputed-
ly as a cosmetic for application to the skin to improve the com-
plexion, for which purpose, owing to its active constituent
being arsenic, it probably proved effective. Anyone in the
secret could buy the poison for its supposed external appli-
cation, and Toffana took care only to deal with individuals
after due safeguards had been built up. She changed her
124 POISON MYSTERIES
abode so frequently, and adopted so many disguises, that
even when suspicion actually fell upon her after many
mysterious deaths, detection was rendered very difficult.
She cunningly worked on the minds of her clients who were
susceptible to religious or superstitious influences, and those
who were unaware of the origin of her deadly solution were
told it was a certain miraculous fluid supposed to ooze from
the tomb of St. Nicholas, a saint of healing.
Her preparations were doubtless bought by many in good
faith in the belief that the liquid had miraculous properties,
but those who knew the secret, especially women, often
used it for criminal purposes, and it is estimated that
over six hundred persons were poisoned by her preparations
in Naples and Rome. Two Popes and other Church
dignitaries are said to have fallen victims to the poison,
and it was not until after a long career, and when Toffana
had reached the age of seventy, that she was found to
be the originator of these wholesale crimes. In a letter
addressed to Hoffman ^ by Garcelli, physician to the Em-
peror Charles VI of Austria, he informed him that being
Governor of Naples at the time, he knew that the Aquetta di
Napoli was the dread of every noble family in the city, and
that the subject was investigated legally. He thus had the
opportunity of examining all the documents, and found the
poison to consist of a solution of arsenic, which was of such
strength that from four to six drops in water or wine was said
to kill an adult, and that it was colourless, transparent and
tasteless.
When the manufacture and sale of the poison was at last
traced to Toffana, she took refuge in a convent, where, under
the privileges of the place, she bade defiance for some time
to the officers of justice, and continued to vend her solution
from the very bosom of the Church until the scandal became
at length too great to be tolerated. She was then dragged
from her refuge and thrown into prison. A great outcry was
raised by the clergy at this violation of their privileges, and
the people, unwilling to be defrauded of their right to use the
poison, joined in the clamour of the priests. It was only by
circulating a report that she had poisoned the wells in the
1 Medicinia Rationalis Systematica, i. 198.
THE ITALIAN SCHOOL OF POISONERS 125
city, that the current of public sentiment could be turned
against her. Being put to the rack she confessed her crimes,
and named those who had afforded her protection. They were
immediately arrested in various churches and monasteries.
It was stated that the day before her last flight from justice,
she had sent two boxes of her " manna " to Rome. They were
found in the custom-house in that city. The archbishop still
murmured at her being torn from a privileged asylum and
accordingly the authorities contrived to have her strangled
and thrown into the court-yard of the convent from which
she had been taken in 1709. Her practices, however, did
not cease at her death, and, according to Keysler, who
travelled in Southern Italy in the early part of the eighteenth
century, the aquetta continued to be prepared in great quan-
tities for some time afterwards.
There was naturally much mystery at the time as to the
composition of Aqua Toffana and the most extraordinary
properties were attributed to it. Its alleged effects are
described by Behrens, a contemporary writer, who states
that on taking it
" a certain indescribable change is felt in the whole body,
which leads the person to complain to his physician. The
physician examines and reflects, but finds no symptoms either
external or internal, no vomiting, no inflammation, no fever.
In short, he can only advise patience, strict regimen, and
laxatives. The malady, however, creeps on, and the physi-
cian is again sent for. Still he cannot detect any symptoms
of note. Meanwhile the poison takes firmer hold of the
system ; languor, wearisomeness, and loathing of food con-
tinue ; the nobler organs gradually become torpid, and the
lungs in particular at length begin to suffer. In a word, the
malady, from the first is incurable ; the unhappy victim
pines away insensibly even in the hands of the physician,
and thus he is brought to a miserable end through months or
years, according to his enemy's desire."
Father Labat, in his Travels in Italy, observes that the
association of the name of St. Nicholas of Bari with Aqua
Toffana was a great advantage to her, as there was such a
preparation in reality, a sacred water, and Toffana's solution,
under the name " Manna of St. Nicholas di Bari," was able
to pass the Custom-house with little scrutiny.
126 POISON MYSTERIES
Toffana had many imitators, who continued to practise
for some time after her death. A similar scheme was
attempted with a poisonous preparation which was sold
for cosmetic purposes, called " Aquetta di Perugia." It is
said to have been prepared by killing a hog, disjointing
it, and strewing the pieces with white arsenic, which was
well rubbed in, and finally collecting the juice which dropped
from the meat itself.
This preparation was supposed to be a much stronger and
powerful poison than arsenic, and was more rapid in its action.
Some idea of the extent to which criminal poisoning was
carried in Italy may be gathered from an account of a secret
society of women that was formed in Rome in 1659. Many
of the members were young married women belonging to
some of the best and wealthiest families of that city. They
apparently met together with the chief obfect of plotting
to destroy the lives of their husbands or members of families
connected with them. They gathered at regular intervals at
the house of a woman called Hieronyma Spara, who was
reputed to be a sorceress. She provided the members
of the Society with the poison necessary for their purposes,
and planned and instructed them how to use it.
Operations had been carried on for some time before the
existence of the Society was discovered, "and," says a con-
temporary writer, " the hardened old hag passed the ordeal
of the rack without confession, but another woman divulged
the secrets of the sisterhood, and La Spara, together with
twelve other women implicated, were hanged." Many others
were publicly whipped through the streets of the city.
A curious story is told of D'Annunzio, the Italian poet,
who became prominent in 1921 in the seizure of Fiume,
which he held as dictator for some time. It is stated that
when serving in the Italian Air Force, which he did with
distinction during the war, it was his custom to carry a
small bottle of a very powerful poison in his pocket which
he used to allude to invariably as "My Pharmic Liber-
ator." This poison he is said to have had concocted for
him in Venice, and it was made from a mediaeval recipe
only known to the Venetian poisoners. It is said that
when he was performing his memorable raid over Vienna the
THE ITALIAN SCHOOL OF POISONERS 127
engines of his aeroplane stopped and restarted thrice over,
and feeling certain that a descent over enemy territory was
inevitable, he got his phial ready in order that the Austrians
should not capture him alive. At that very moment he is
said to have seen an apparition of his mother, who had died
two years beforehand, who bade him cast away all fears and
he would get through. He is said also to have kept his
phial of poison close at his hand during the bombardment of
Fiume, and his friends had to keep perpetual watch upon
him during those critical hours.
CHAPTER XII
THE MYSTERY OF THE BORGIAS
CONSIDERABLE mystery has ever enveloped the
history of the Borgia family, whose name historians
have linked with some of the most morbid stories of crime
and secret poisoning during the Middle Ages. A great deal
that has been written concerning their crimes is doubtless
pure fiction, and it is only within recent years that owing to
the discovery of certain contemporary documents some light
has been thrown upon the darksome deeds they are said to
have perpetrated. From an examination of these records, on
the one hand it would appear that certain members of the
family were not so black as tradition has painted them, and
on the other there seems little doubt that some of the Borgias
were guilty of terrible and sinister deeds, which were only too
common in the times in which they lived.
The Borgias, who were- of Spanish origin, migrated to Italy
and came into notoriety in the time of Pope Calixtus III, about
the year 1455. The first member to come into prominence
was Rodrigo, who was born in 1431, and who began life
as a soldier. Afterwards, through the influence of Calixtus
he entered the priesthood, and finally rose to be the head of
the Church under the title of Pope Alexander VI. He is said
to have had five children by his mistress Vanozza de Cattanei,
viz. : Pier Luigi, who died in infancy, Giovanni Duke of
Gandia, Giffredo Count of Cariati, Cesare, afterwards Duke of
Valentinois, and Lucrezia, who eventually became Duchess
of Ferrara.
Alexander himself is described by contemporary writers
as " a handsome man of majestic and kingly bearing," and is
said to have looked " more like a Caesar returned to life than
a Vicar of Christ."
128
POPE ALEXANDER VI.
(From the painting by Pinturicchio in the Vatican.)
THE MYSTERY OF THE BORGIAS 129
As his children grew up he loaded them with titles and
honours. When he came to the papal chair Cesare was about
twenty-two years of age and Lucrezia between thirteen and
fourteen. He recognized all of them in special Bulls, except
Cesare, from whom (in order to bestow the purple on him)
he wished to remove, the stigma of his origin, and declared
him to be the son of Vanozza and Domenico d'Arignano.
This is proclaimed in a Bull dated October 17, 1480.
In the early part of 1498 a youth was introduced to the
household called Romano, who the Pope declared was the
son of Cesare and created him Duke of Nepi, and presented
him with large estates. According to documents discovered
by Gregorovius, dated September i, 1501, the Pope himself
was the real father, and the maternity of this boy involves
one of the most obscure mysteries of the history of the Borgias.
Before Alexander obtained the pontificate, he had be-
trothed Lucrezia to a Spanish gentleman, but he broke off
the engagement with the evident object of marrying his
daughter to a man of higher rank, and on June 12, 1493,
Lucrezia was espoused to Giovanni Sforza, Lord of Pesaro.
The marriage was not by any means a happy one, and at the
end of four years was dissolved by the Pope, who had other
motives in view, for he soon arranged a fresh alliance between
Lucrezia and Alfonso Duke of Bisceglie, the natural son
of Alfonso n. King of Naples. The marriage took place,
but soon after the birth of their first child, the Duke was
attacked by several men and severely wounded. The story
is thus told by a chronicler : —
" On the night of July 15 (1500) on which solemn cere-
monies were taking place to celebrate the jubilee of the Pope,
a young man staggered headlong into the pontifical apart-
ments, endeavouring to stem with his hands a stream of
blood which gushed from a large wound in his chest. It was
the Duke of Bisceglie, Alfonso of Aragon, Lucrezia 's second
husband. Consternation was caused when it was spread
abroad that a band of assassins in the pay of Cesare had
attempted to assassinate him near the steps of St. Peter's
when on his way to the celebration. The young man, who is
said to have been of a kind and gentle nature, fell unconscious
at the feet of the Pope. Lucrezia and his sister Sancia, who
were standing by, both fainted away and were carried into
I
130 POISON MYSTERIES
a room of the tower behind the Pope's chambers. He is said
to have been nursed by the two women and to have nearly-
recovered, when one night in Lucrezia's absence he was
strangled with a cord in bed under the eyes of Cesare."
Lucrezia then retired for a time to the estate of Nepi. On
her return to Rome, she appears to have acted as a kind of
secretary to her father the Pope, and in about twelve months
her betrothal to Alfonso d'Este, the eldest son of the Duke
of Ferrara, was announced, and the marriage took place by
proxy on December 20, 1502. Shortly afterwards she left
Rome to take up her residence in Ferrara.
From father to children, who apparently put no restraint
on their criminal and sensual instincts, it was not long before
the most extraordinary stories were circulated about the
Borgias. Cesare, in particular, appears to have been a
degenerate of the worst possible type. Fie was first made
bishop of Pampeluna and afterwards Cardinal of Valenza, and
appears to have been even a worse character than his father.
Tragedies in the family began in 1497 when Giovanni Duke
of Gandia, the second son, was found in the Tiber, his body
being pierced with ten wounds from a dagger. According to
Scalona, suspicion rested on Sforza Count of Pesaro.
Cesare conceived a violent jealousy of an attendant in his
sister's household, named Pedro Calderon, who was probably
a Spaniard. In a fit of passion he is said to have pursued the
man with a dagger right into the pontifical apartments and
assassinated him in the presence of the Pope, "even so,"
says the chronicler, " that the pontifical garments were
splashed with blood." According to Capello, "four hired
ruffians carried his body to the Tiber, tied a large stone to his
neck and threw him into the river."
Public feeling now began to be aroused against the Borgias,
but Alexander kept on his way serenely, in spite of the wave
of contumely which seethed round the papal throne in Rome.
Sannazaro's couplets, Pontano's epigrams, and the reports
let drop by the Mantuan and Venetian ambassadors of the
grave rumours but whispered in Rome, were followed by the
accusations of bishops and even of some cardinals, but
nothing was done.
In justice to the Borgias one must try to visualize the
THE MYSTERY OF THE BORGIAS t3l
condition of the people in Rome at this period. Poison may
be said to have become a common weapon in the social and
political life of the country. For the politician it was a
weapon which procured him office, for the theologian a secret
method of removing an enemy from his path, and so on
throughout the whole social strata. Superstitions were
rampant, and according to a writer of the time, even the
worst criminals would make the sign of the Cross on passing
before a church and supplicate the Madonna to give them help
and profit in their crimes. Scarcely any value was attached
to human life, and those in prominent positions lived in a con-
stant state of insecurity. No wonder that vendors of amulets,
talismans and antidotes to poison flourished everywhere.
Apollinaire paints a lurid picture of the Borgias in his
account of a fete held in the vineyard of St. Peter-in-Chains,
in the following words : —
" La Vanozza de Cattanei receives the cardinals and the
ambassadors, and after being introduced to one another,
the guests disperse about the vineyard and exchange con-
versation and courtesies. Later she disappears and joins
Cesare in a room on the first floor of the building. She finds
him with his sleeves rolled up, bent over a kneading trough,
and absorbed in his task. This room was reserved for Van-
ozza and Cesare ; only the Pope shared with them the right
of entry, no one else was allowed to cross the threshold. On
the floor lay several large shallow copper dishes, some of
which were entirely covered with verdigris, and from which
a colourless-looking liquid was being evaporated. One of
these dishes was always placed near the fire in order that the
heat might hasten the evaporation.
" As La Vanozza enters Cesare remarks : ' Yet I forbade
you to make a fire.'
" ' 1 only put a few live coals to hasten the result,' she
replies. ' I did not make enough for it to be possible for the
powder to scorch ; if I had not done it we should not have
had the powder to-day ! '
" ' It is not so much for fear of its scorching, but because
of the cinders which mix with the powder and render it less
fine,' said Cesare. ' Happily Cardinal di Riaro is short-
sighted. This is quite enough for him in any case, but for
others, hand me the tart dish,' he continues. ' It should be dry
by now.'
132 POISON MYSTERIES
" La Vanozza lifts the heavy red copper dish by the two
handles, and on it may be noticed a mouldiness, or greenish
spots caused by a settling deposit. With a hare's paw Cesare
collects this powder, then with an ivory knife he carefully
scrapes the copper, and mixes the residue in a marble mortar.
From it he takes in small pinches some of the powder and places
it in another mortar of agate, and reduces it with a pestle to
an impalpable dust until it is like a morsel of polished silver.
Give me the " manna," ' says Cesare. La Vanozza
hands him the arsenic which he calls by that name, and he
mixes some with the powder in the mortar, passing the
mixture again under the pestle until thoroughly incorporated,
and then, his task completed, he stands erect and exclaims,
' God said " Let there be light " and there was light. We
Borgias are able to say " Let it be night," and night it shall
be.' He then remarks to Vanozza, ' It is time for luncheon.'
La Vanozza leaves him and retraces her way ; when she is
gone, the copper dish being empty, he pours urine in it in
order to replace that which has evaporated, the salts of
which he had just utilised. The salt which resulted, combined
with the verdigris were then mixed with arsenic and this
formed the famous poison which the Borgias called ' La
Cantarella.' ' That which the Borgias utihzed in conjunction
Vv'ith arsenic without knowing it,' says ApoUinaire, ' was
phosphorus, a secret which had been divulged to the Borgias
by a Spanish monk, who also knew the antidote for it, as
well as an antidote for arsenic ; one sees, therefore, that they
were well armed.' "
There is no evidence to prove the truth of ApoUinaire's
statements, and he may only have recorded the reports
common at the time. These records are, however, useful
to compare with the statements made by other contemporary
historians.
An astrologer is said to have predicted to Alexander that
he would never die so long as he carried on his person a
box containing the Blessed Sacrament. This gold box is
stated to have never left his person. On a certain day he is
said to have invited those who had been nominated as car-
dinals to supper with him. Suspicious of their host the com-
manded guests were doubtful of acceptance, and only agreed
to come on condition that the supper took place at the
house of the Cardirr.' de Corneto. Alexander and his son
CESARE BORGIA.
{From a pamting ascribed to Raphael.
THE MYSTERY OF THE BORGIAS 133
Cesare are stated to have bribed the chief attendant of the
Cardinal for a large sum and pledged him to serve certain
wine at dinner to which they had added poison. The evening
arrived, and Alexander, as he entered the room, remembered
he had forgotten the box containing the Blessed Sacrament.
He at once ordered Monsignor Caraffa to fetch it ; Apollinaire,
who records the story, says, " While Caraffa obeyed, the Pope
irritated by his forgetfulness, asked that a drink should be
brought to him before seating himself at the table. The
chamberlain in attendance said he would see the order was
carried out, but it happened that the chief attendant whom
the Pope had bribed was absent at the moment, and the
chamberlain who came for the wine was served by an under-
ling who was in ignorance of the plot. A goblet was filled
from the poisoned caraffe which had been prepared by Cesare
and taken to the Pope. Directly after Caraffa arrived, bring-
ing wijth him the missing box. It was, however, too late ;
the Pope had drunk some of the wine and was already feeling
the effects of the poison. Cardinal Valentinois himself lay
convulsed upon the ground, surrounded by the others kneeling
round in absorbed awe and murmuring Pater Nosters. Alex-
ander appeared to suffer greater agonies than the rest. Sur-
geons were called in and bled him without any effect, and he
succumbed on the eighth day afterwards."
Sanuto gives another account of Alexander's death.
" The death of Pope Alexander VI," he states, " occurred
in the following manner. The Cardinal Datary Arian de
Corneto having one morning received a message from the
Pontiff stating that he intended in company with his son
Cesare, the Duke of Valentinois, that evening to pay the
Cardinal a visit and to sup with him, and that they would
bring their supper with them, was terrified at the intelligence,
being fully impressed with the conviction that His Hohness
or his son intended poisoning him to possess his treasure,
the said Cardinal being very rich. Thinking rapidly over the
matter he saw but one means of saving his hfe. He immedi-
ately sent to the head carver of the Pope requesting he would
oblige him by visiting him as soon as possible. The carver
obeyed the request and the Cardinal having conducted him
to a private room placed in his hand ten golden ducats which
he requested the said carver to accept as a proof of the love
134 POISON MYSTERIES
he bore him. After many objections and simulated repug-
nance the carver accepted the gift, stating that he did so
from obedience to the orders of his Eminence. The Cardinal
then finding the carver willing to lend a ready ear to anything
he might say, addressed him in the following manner : ' You
perfectly well know the intentions of the Pope and that he
and his son have determined that I shall die by poison, which
will be administered to me this evening and I now humbly
beg of you to spare my life.'
" After some demur the carver told him the manner in
which it had been agreed between them that the poison should
be administered. After supper was over he had been ordered
to place on the table three boxes of confectionery one of
which was to be placed before the Pope, another before the
Cardinal, and the third before the Duke of Valentinois, taking
care to place the one containing the poison before his Ex-
cellency. The Cardinal begged and implored the said carver
to change the manner in which the confectionaries were to be
placed on the table so that the one containing the poison*should
be put before the Pope, that he might eat of it and die. The
carver at first was horrified at the suggestion, but on the
Cardinal offering him 10,000 ducats in gold as a reward he
relented and agreed that the box of poisoned sweetmeats
should be placed before the Pope.
" In the evening of the same day the Pope accompanied by
the Duke arrived at the palace of his Eminence, who as soon
as his Holiness had seated himself flung himself on the ground
before him and kissed his feet. Then with most affectionate
words he begged his Holiness would grant him a favour say-
ing he would never rise from his knees should his Holiness
refuse to oblige him. Surprised at the extreme earnestness
of the Cardinal, the Pope asked him to rise from his knees
and explain his request. The Cardinal however persisting,
the Pope was surprised at the perseverance of his Eminence
and promised to grant him any request he might make. The
Cardinal then rose from his knees and said, ' It is not respectful
that when the lord honours his servant with a visit his servant
should eat at the same table with his lord and the favour I
ask of you is just and honest. It is that you will allow me
during your repast to wait on you as your servant.' His
Holiness to please the Cardinal granted his request. After
the supper was over, the Cardinal placed on the table the
boxes of sweetmeats, having first received information from
the carver which was the one containing the poison, and that
THE MYSTERY OF THE BORGIAS 135
the Cardinal placed before the Pope, who under the impression
that the one before him did not contain the poisoned sweet-
meats ate one of them gaily, and of the other which he believed
contained the poison, the Pope pressed the Cardinal to eat,
who obeyed him without hesitation. Shortly after His
Holiness had departed he fell ill and the next morning died ;
while the Cardinal, who still having some fear that the sweet-
meats he had eaten might have been poisoned, took an emetic
and thus escaped the danger with which he had been threat-
ened."
Lecontour agrees with the account given by ApoUinaire
in the following words :
" It should be called to your notice that this death has
been the subject of many discussions and that the documents
transmitted differ very much. Here are some opinions on the
subject, and first of all there is the description of the corpse
of the Pope by the Marquis of Mantua, in a letter written to
his wife Isabella, and then the testimony of those who ap-
proached the body and which is made to disquiet us. Here
is one : —
" Immediately after his death, the Pope became black and
so deformed, so prodigiously swollen that it was hardly pos-
sible to recognise him, putrefied matter flowed from his nose,
his mouth was open and in so terrifying an attitude that one
could not look at it without horror, nor suffer the stench with-
out fear of being infected."
In a further letter written by the Marquis of Mantua at
the time, he says :
" His body has become putrefied, foam comes from the
mouth as from a saucepan on the fire. This has lasted as
long as he has remained unburied. He has swelled so enor-
mously that he no longer has the form of a human being, and
it is impossible to distinguish between the length and the
breadth of the body.
" No one would touch this mass of flesh and putrefaction.
No one would put it in the coflin. Those who approached
it fell asphyxiated.
" In the end two street porters were found who consented
to drag it, by means of cords which were attached to the
legs of the death bed, as far as the vault where they let it
136 POISON MYSTERIES
drop. The flesh detached itself during the transit, leaving
a track of putrefying fragments."
Portigliotti, writing of the death of Alexander VI, states :
" There was no religious rapture at his death-bed, no holy
prayers beside his corpse. As soon as he had breathed his
last, Cesare, who was keeping to his own rooms on pretence of
illness, sent his trusted squires to close all doors which gave
access to the papal apartment. One of them (says Burck-
hardt) drawing a dagger threatened Cardinal Casanova that
he would cut his throat and throw him out of the window if
he did not give him at once the keys of the pontifical treasury ;,
the cardinal, terrified, gave them to him. The strong-boxes
soon yielded piles of golden ducats, while the servants rifled
the wardrobes and rooms, leaving only a few cloth tapestries
fastened on the walls.
" The Pope's body, washed and clothed, was placed in
a room between two wax candles. None went to recite over
it the prayers for the dead, none watched it that night. The
next morning it was borne, uncovered according to rite, into
St. Peter's Church. The cardinal who presided at the function
fearing that some one would gash it out of personal spite,
had it brought into a chapel behind a very high and resistent
iron grating. ' Vultus erat sicut pannus vel morus nigerrimus,'
writes Burckhardt, ' livori totus plenus, os amplissimum, nasus
plenus, lingua duplex in ore, que labia tota implebat, os
apertum ed adeo orribile quod nemo videns unquam ad esse
talem dixerit.' The orator Costabili mentions that evening
in a despatch ' the Pope's body has been all day in St.
Peter's, an ugly thing to see, black and swoUen . . . and many
do not doubt he has been poisoned.' "
To counteract the rumours of poisoning which the rapid
decomposition of the body was arousing, it was thought well
to keep it covered by day and only to leave it exposed in the
evening. But at night, by the yellowish, flickering and
smoking light of the candles, Borgia appeared still more
horrible and terrifying : a repulsive fetor emanated from
that black and putrefying flesh. It was therefore decided to
enclose it without more ado in the bier. Two joiners and
six porters " ludentes et blasfemantes sive contra papam sive
in spretum cadaveris," " had no small difliculty in pushing it
into the coffin, which had become too narrow : and because
THE MYSTERY OF THE BORGIAS 137
the stench and the heat were unbearable, they hastened their
task without any regard, and forced it in with hand and foot.
No priest was present at the funeral operation, not a candle
was lit."
In the morning, there was found on the bier these couplets :
" Quis jacet hie. Sextus — Quis funera plangit ? Erymus.
Quis comes in tanto funere obit ? Vitium.
Et quae causa necis ? Virus pro homina, virus,
Humane generi vita salusque fuit."
The Venetian Giustinian who attended him in his last hours
wrote the significant words, " Very near the end of the tribu-
lation of Christendom," and a Bolognese priest, noting the
date of his death in the margin of a document, says, " To-day
he is descended to hell where he was bom."
On the other hand, Burckhardt, whose account is gener-
ally favoured, states that the Pope was attacked by
a fever on August 12, 1503, and on the i6th he was bled,
the disorder seeming to become a tertian. On the 17th he
took medicine, but the following day he became so ill that
his life was despaired of. He then received the viaticum
during mass, which was celebrated in his chamber, at which
five cardinals assisted. In the evening extreme unction was
administered to him, and a few minutes afterwards he died.
This account is corroborated by Muratori, who quotes many
authorities to show that the death of Alexander was not
caused by poison, and the balance of evidence certainly
seems in favour of the theory that, despite all his crimes,
Alexander VI died from a natural cause, and that probably
a fever of virulent type.
Thus ended Alexander VI, after a pontificate of eleven
years, on August 18, 1503.
According to a chronicler of the time :
" Cesare Borgia survived his father, and his life was saved
because he had himself plunged into the stomach of a living
mule, but on his recovery he lost both his power and his
prestige. The Pope Julius II, after the very short pontificate
of Pius III, which only lasted twenty-one days, ordered his
arrest when he was tlie master of all Central Italy, after having
arrested Varano, Vitelli, the Orsini and the Baglioni. Cesare
resisted for a year, sustained by the imimpeachable fidelity
138 POISON MYSTERIES
of his captains and soldiers. He yielded at last in 1504, was
liberated again, but fell into the hands of Gonzalo di Cordova,
who sent him to Spain. Having escaped, he took service
again in the capacity of commander under his father-in-law,
the King of Navarre. He died in 1507 in a fight, pierced by a
javelin.
Another historian gives the following account of the end of
Cesare : —
" At the time of his father's death Cesare Borgia was
sick in bed, his illness it is said being caused by swallowing a
portion of the poisoned sweetmeats which cost his father his
life. Cesare it is related partook of the poisoned sweetmeats
in error and omitted to carry out the advice of Macchiavelli
always to carry an antidote with him."
It is probable that he was suffering from an attack of the
same fever which his father had contracted.
On hearing of the Pope's death, although unable to leave
his room, he at once sent one of his emissaries with several
armed attendants to take possession of the palace and allow
no one to enter until he had taken away his father's treasure.
As time went on he became more and more unpopular, and
public feeling was very strong against him. After some time
it was arranged that he should be allowed to quit the Eccles-
iastical States. Three days were given him to leave the city,
but after the election of Julius II he again returned to Rome.
Feeling was still strong against him, and he decided to journey
to France to seek the assistance of the King. The King of
Navarre gave him command of a troop of horse, and in a
small battle under the walls of the castle of Viana Cesare
was killed.
Remorsi says : —
" The Duke of Valentinois did not die, because God willed
that as a greater scourge this ambitious and cruel spirit should
survive fortune and grandeur and see his most down-trodden
enemies in power, for the strength of his temperament and of
his youth overcame the poison, being aided by good remedies
which the doctors gave him. Some of them assert that the
most efficacious remedy employed was that of putting him
several times into the body of a bull or mule opened for
the purpose, like Ladislas, King of Naples, who was delivered
1 , =:i:^ -^
i ' ■ '■
rr:- -— • 1
P
LUCREZIA BORGIA.
(From the painting by Pinturicchio in the Vatican.)
THE MYSTERY OF THE BORGIAS 139
in this manner from the poison which was given to him in his
youth.
" Others write of having heard the said Cardinal (di Cor-
neto) say in the villa where he took the poison, how he was
plunged into a great vessel of cold water, from which he was
not taken until his skin had been entirely removed in pieces,
because his intestines were completely burned. However his
cure was effected, he remained extremely oppressed by the
illness for a long time and at a time when he had most need of
perfect health in order to remedy the revolution of his affairs.
So that he constantly had reason to complain of his reverses of
fortune."
Cesare's death was lamented at least by one person, and
that was his sister Lucrezia, who at once set out for the Monas-
tery of Corpo di Christo to offer prayers for his soul, where she
remained for two nights.
Some of the entries in the book of her household expenses
are interesting, and throw a light on the remuneration paid
to a Court physician of the time.
In 1507 is an entry : —
" To Maestro Ludovico physician to Her Highness no lire
for the balance of his salary.
" On the 31st December 240 lire as a year's salary for her
Highness's physician Maestro Ludovico at the rate of 20 lire
a month."
Patroness of poets and painters in her latter days, Lucrezia
made herself popular in Ferrara. In the Library of Modeno
is a list of her magnificent jewels which she sold to free her
husband from the debts he contracted during the wars in
defence of his territories. Many of her letters still extant show
that during these troublous times the relief of the poor, sick
and needy was Lucrezia's constant care. She died during her
confinement on June 21, 15 19. The accouchement had been
long and difficult and the officers and servants of her house-
hold were clustered at the foot of the grand staircase leading
to her room. Great fears were entertained of her recovery,
and they waited in breathless silence for every sound from
the apartment. "At length," says the chronicler, " Maestro
Alberti, the Court Apothecary, was seen descending the stair-
case with an ewer in his hand. All pressed forward to ask him
140 POISON MYSTERIES
where he was going. He replied significantly, ' To get some
rose water to wash the body of the duchess.' "
Thus ended Lucrezia Borgia, Duchess of Ferrara, who, to
quote a letter written by a cousin of Federico Gonzaga who
was present in Ferrara at the time, was "one who appears
to have been universally beloved not only for the habitual
piety of her life, but for her unbounded charity and kindness
of heart."
Lucrezia has been accused of being guilty of the worst
possible crimes, including that of poisoning, but there is
practically no historic proof of the truth of these stories.
It is probable that many of the infamous crimes of her
brother Cesare were attributed erroneously to her.
The composition of the so-called " Cantarella," the poison
said to have been employed by the Borgias, has long
been a subject of dispute. According to Paolo Jovio, it
was " a kind of whitish powder, that- to a certain extent
resembled sugar, and which had been used on a great many
poor innocent people who died in a miserable state."
Carelli, physician to Charles VI, gives the following account
of how it was prepared. Fle states : " The abdominal viscera
of a sow which had been poisoned with arsenic were powdered
with arsenious acid ; they waited until the putrefaction was
complete and the liquids which flowed from it were then con-
centrated by evaporation and constituted a white powder
which was called ' La Cantarella.' " Apollinaire's account
of its preparation has already been given, from which it may
be concluded that it consisted of a mixture of subacetate of
copper and crude phosphorus.
Several other contemporary writers claim to give the true
method of its preparation. One states that a bear was killed,
then cut open and treated in a similar manner and the liquid
that dripped from it formed the poison.
It is evident that this method of preparing a venom was
employed by some of the Italian poisoners and was known at
the period. The combination of the animal poison contained
in the products of putrefaction, together with arsenic, would
no doubt furnish a poisonous substance of a very powerful
nature, but whether the Borgias ever used such a prepara-
tion there is no evidence to prove.
t, >= ^
I o
& !^ a,
U «
THE MYSTERY OF THE BORGIAS 141
Baron Corvo, in his Chronicles of the Borgias, scouts the
idea that the family possessed any such secret, and denies
that the venom ever existed. The probabiUty is, that when
the Borgias found it necessary to use a poison for nefarious
purposes they employed arsenic, which was so commonly
used in Italy at that period. The fact that Cesare Borgia's
signet ring contained a secret receptacle which might easily
have been used to carry arsenic, goes a long way to sub-
stantiate this conjecture, and is the strongest evidence we
have that he at least used a very powerful poison to carry
out his evil designs.
In connection with the Borgia poison there is an interesting
story that the secret of its preparation perished with the Due
Riaro-Sforza, who died in Paris about the middle of the nine-
teenth century. Before his death, one evening at the opera
the Duke is said to have confided to a distinguished critic, who
occupied the neighbouring stall, that he still possessed the
secret of the f amyous poison, although for centuries it had lain
idle in the family archives. Its composition was, he added,
simpler than generally supposed, and not long afterwards he
told his friends that, feeling age advancing and having no
direct heirs, he had thought it best to burn the recipe lest it
might fall into bad hands.
CHAPTER XIII
POISON MYSTERIES IN EARLY SCOTTISH
HISTORY
ACCORDING to ancient historical records Scotland
had its poison mysteries in early times.
In the year 1332 Thomas Randolph, Earl of Moray, who on
the death of Robert Bruce was appointed Regent during the
minority of the young King David the Second, is said to have
been a victim to poison.
Hector Boece, in his Cronikles of Scotland, boldly attributes
his death to the malice of Edward III, King of England, who,
he states, " tuk purpos to sla him be venome." The fatal
draught is said to have been administered to the Earl by a
monk who had been sent by the English King as a physician,
with the result that the unfortunate Moray found " certaine
dolouris ilk day mair increasing in his wame," and died very
suddenly.
The Duke of Albany, younger son of James III, according
to a chronicler, was also " posonit in oure Souverane lordis
presens and palas," which caused " a sclandir and murmur
rising in thecuntre," but by whom it was administered it is
not known.
In 1497 Margaret Drummond, mistress of James the Fourth,
is said to have been poisoned, with her two sisters, at the
instigation of the nobles who wished the king to marry.
In 1536 Jean Douglas, Lady Glamis, grand- daughter of
" Bell-the-Cat," was tried for having removed her husband
some years before per intoxication em, and for having conspired
to dispose in the same way of King James the Fifth, who had
put the whole Douglas family under ban. She was convicta
de arte et parte proditorie conspirationis et imaginationis inter-
fectionis sive destructionis nobilissime personne serenissimi
domini nostri Regis per pessimum venenum lie poysone, and
142
EARLY SCOTTISH POISON MYSTERIES 143
condemned to "be had to Castell hill of Edinburghe and
their Brynt in ane fyre to the deid, as ane Traytour."
Another case of alleged poisoning famous in Scottish history
is that of the Earl of Atholl, Treasurer of the Kingdom, who
died suddenly after a reconciliation feast given by the Regent,
Morton. Atholl, a near kinsman of the King, was a Catholic ;
Morton "a licentious man, but a fervent Protestant " : the
two men were, besides, rivals in the State. It was generally
believed at the time that Atholl was poisoned by Morton,
and so clamorous did the popular indignation become, that
by order of the Privy Council an inquest was held in the
presence of the King and his Councillors. Six surgeons were
appointed to make a post-mortem examination. James
Owhegarty, "Ireland man born leiche that ministratis medicine
in the mouth and curis outward be herbis," testified that the
cause of death was " rank venom " introduced by the mouth.
The testimony of Alexander Prestoun, " Doctour in Medicine,"
and George Boswell, " Mediciner and Chirurgiane in Perty,"
was to the same effect. Gilbert Moncrieff gave a more
guarded opinion ; he considered the humour in the stomach
to be venomous, but was unable to say whether it was exterior
or interior grown within the body. David Rattray, " Chirur-
giane in Conpare," gave it as his opinion, that death was
caused by " ane extraordinarie poyson," adding that " ane
spune put in the humour change it in the cullour of brass."
R. Craig, "Burgess of Edinburgh, chirurgiane," cautiously
opined that the Earl " to all appearance " had died of poison.
A non-medical witness thought that a red matter shown
to him by Dr. Prestoun was " a cauld poyson." Several
ministers also gave testimony, one of them stating that he
saw "strange and unnatural tokens in the stomach, black
and red, as it were the dregs of bread and wine mixed, and
that he had heard the dead man say " that he had got offence,
and God forgive them that had done it." Bernardino de
Mendoza, the Spanish Ambassador, writing to his King, gives
the following description of the inquest : —
They had opened the body in the presence of five doctors,
three of whom said he had been poisoned, and two that he had
not. One of the latter, to assure them that he was right, by
proof, took some of the contents of the stomach on his finger,
144 POISON MYSTERIES
and put it into his mouth. The effect was that in a few hours
he was thought to be dying. It is not known whether the
order to poison him came from Morton or some private person.
In the end " the physicians did upon their oath declare
that his death was not caused by any extraordinary means."
The result of the inquest did not, however, allay the general
suspicion, and Morton thought it necessary, when he was
about to die on the scaffold in 1581, to make a solemn declar-
ation, that he "would not for the Earldom of Atholl have
either ministered poison unto him or caused it to be min-
istered unto him."
Shortly after the death of Robert Stewart, Earl of Orkney,
who was an illegitimate brother of Queen Mary, a quarrel
arose between his eldest son Patrick and his young brothers,
John, James, and William Stewart. Eventually the latter
were suspected of conspiring to poison their brother, who had
succeeded to the title, and in 1596 we find the three brothers,
John, James and William, were brought to trial and accused
of having " conspyrit and dewysit how to murthour the said
Patrick Erl of Orkney his brother, be poysoning or utherwayes
be craft and guylt dealing," in November, 1593.
The Earl, it appears, captured his brother's servant, who
confessed he was hired to do the deed. This confession, how-
ever, was only extorted from him after being tortured eleven
days and nights in the " cashie-lawis," put in the " buitis "
twice a day, and " skargeit with towis."
Tried on the charge of plotting to murder the Earl at a
banquet in the house of David Moncriefis of Kirkwell in
Orkney, John was acquitted.
Another Scottish noble, George Home, Earl of Dunbar, is
said to have been poisoned by " tablets of Sugar given him for
expelling the cold " by Secretary Cecil in 161 1. A post-
mortem examination was made by one Martin Souqir, a
doctor, who is said to have tried the poison by laying his
finger on the subject's heart and touching it with his tongue "
(a curious clinical test for poison on which apparently great
reliance was placed at that period), with the result that he
died within a few days thereafter.
CHAPTER XIV
HISTORIC POISON CASES IN FRANCE
IN the latter part of the sixteenth century the mania for
criminal poisoning spread from Italy to France. The
practice increased with great rapidity, and poisons appear to
have been commonly employed by those of the highest to the
lowest classes of society, to get rid of enemies and undesirable
persons. It is stated that the Prior of Cluny and his valet
Saint-Barthelemy, with grim humour, even poisoned their
physicians in order to avoid paying them. It may be said of
the many stories of poison mysteries in France that have come
down to us from the seventeenth century, that though their
truth maybe doubtful they are not without romantic interest.
Jeanne d'Albret, mother of Flenry IV, who died of a fever
after four days' illness, was generally believed to have met
her death by wearing poisoned gloves. So great was the
credibility of the stories spread abroad after the sudden death
of many distinguished persons, that in this case it was
believed that the gloves were placed in a box with a double
bottom, beneath which was placed a mixture of opium, bella-
donna, hyoscyamus, and other poisons. These were sup-
posed not only to have impregnated the gloves but to have
been administered to the victim while asleep, the box being
exposed under her nostrils.
Francis II, the first husband of Mary Queen of Scots, who
died in 1560, was supposed to have succumbed to poison, and
Beaucaire de Peguillon goes so far as to charge Ambroise
Pare, the great military surgeon, with having been the cause
of the crime. As a matter of fact, it was proved from an in-
vestigation by Courladon a few years ago, that Francis, who
was born with an obstruction of the nose and mouth, probably
due to adenoids, died from chronic suppurative otitis.
145 K
146 POISON MYSTERIES
The Due d'Albe asserts that Mary Stuart was the cause of
his death, but John Knox was nearer the mark when he wrote
on hearing of it : " The potent hand of God from above sent
unto us a wonderful and most joyful deliverance ; for unhappy
Francis, husband to our Sovereign, suddenly perisheth of a
rotten ear . . . that deaf ear that never would hear the truth
of God."
A curious method of introducing poison is recorded in
the story of the Cardin?i of Lorraine, uncle of Mary Queen
of Scots, who is said to have died after touching poisoned
gold coins. As a matter of fact, there is evidence to
show that his death was due to pleurisy caused by a cold
caught in walking barefooted at the head of a procession
at Avignon. Catherine de' Medici was credited with having
poisoned her three sons, Charles IX, the Due d'Anjou and
Francis II, but the story has apparently no foundation.
Towards the end of the sixteenth century a romantic case
connected with poison, which caused great consternation in
Paris, was that of the death of Gabrielle d'Astrees. The divorce
proceedings between Henry IV and Marguerite de Valois were
, almost complete, when all preparations for the marriage of the
King to Madame d'Astrees were brought to a sudden end in
Holy Week, 1599, by her mysterious death. A post-mortem
examination made by the doctors threw no light on the cause
of death, and hints began to be spread abroad that she had
been secretly poisoned by the Grand Duke of Tuscany. Accord-
ing to the story, she had arrived in Paris on Tuesday, April 6,
and on the following Thursday, while in the Church of Saint-
Antoine, she was taken ill with headache and vertigo and had
to leave before the end of the service. Severe convulsive
attacks followed, which increased in violence and frequency,
until she lost consciousness and died during the night of
April 10. The cause of her death remains a mystery.
The seventeenth century saw a still greater increase in the
mysterious deaths in France attributed to poison. On June
30, 1670, Henrietta Anne of England, Duchess of Orleans and
sister of King Charles II, died suddenly in Paris. It appears
that after drinking a glass of cold water in her apartment at
St. Cloud, she was said to have been seized with a fit of shiver-
ing, followed by acute fever, which caused her great agonies.
HISTORIC POISON CASES IN FRANCE 147
Consternation was caused when she declared to her ladies
that she had been poisoned, and physicians were sent for in
hot haste. On their arrival they were struck with her livid
appearance, and, acknowledging their helplessness in giving
her relief, advised her to receive the Last Sacraments of the
Church without delay. The Duchess, on hearing of this,
desired that Bossuet, who had attended her mother the Queen-
Dowager of England, should be called in, and three couriers
were immediately dispatched to bring him. Before he arrived
at St. Cloud between eleven and twelve at night, she had
received the Sacrament from the hands of the Abbe Feuillet,
who appears to have treated her with considerable harshness.
Between her shrieks caused by the violent pain, he told her
that her sins were not punished as they deserved. On the
arrival of Bossuet, the Duchess entreated him to promise not
to leave until she breathed her last ; he fell on his knees by
her bedside, holding a crucifix in his hand, and with tremulous
voice invited her to join him in devotion. She remembered
that the crucifix which he held in his hands towards her
was the same which he had given to her mother the Queen-
Dowager, to hold in her agony. She took it in her hand and
held it in hers till she breathed her last. Before she died
she spoke to Madame de Lafayette in English, expressing her
gratitude for the assistance she had received from Bossuet,
and requested that an old emerald ring set with diamonds of
great value might be presented to him. The Duchess died at
three o'clock in the morning, and the news being conveyed
to the King, he sent for Bossuet and gave him the emerald
ring, placing it on his finger, and desiring him to wear it for
the rest of his life.
We owe this description to Butler, who edited the life of
Bossuet. The Duchess undoubtedly believed herself to have
been poisoned, and the same belief appears to have been held
by the English ambassador, the Court and the people of the
city of Paris. It is even said that one of her household gave
the name of her poisoner to Voltaire, and the medium was
stated to be diamond dust strewn on strawberries with sugar.
Another rumour was that she died in consequence of drinking
a glass of succory water which had been poisoned, but
according to Voltaire she died a natural death. This is most
148 POISON MYSTERIES
probable, as she had suffered from a chronic disease of the liver
for some time ; diamond dust, it may be said, is without any
poisonous properties, and could only act as a mechanical
irritant in the stomach.
About this time a German apothecary and alchemist named
Glaser settled in Paris and, together with Exali and another
Italian, began work in a laboratory they started, reputedly with
the object of searching for the philosophers' stone. Plaving
come to the end of their resources in a very short time in the
pursuit of this chimera, they commenced the secret sale of
poisons. Through the confessional their nefarious trade
became known to the Grand Penitentiary of Paris. This dig-
nitary gave information to the Government, and the two of the
suspected chemists were promptly sent to the Bastille, where
one of them died. Exali, however, while still in prison,
managed to carry on his business and found ready purchasers
for his secrets. Catherine de' Medici was said to have been
instrumental in introducing the Italian methods into France,
and deaths in Paris attributed to poisons now increased to
an alarming extent. Florentine perfumers were supposed
to have been- adepts in mixing the poisons with sweetmeats
and articles of food.
From the highest to the lowest all seem to have had
the dread of meeting death in this way, and it is said that
Henry IV, when a guest at the Louvre, ate only eggs which he
cooked himself and drank only water which he drew from
the Seine.
In 1682 it was thought necessary to devise some more
drastic method of dealing with the secret sale of poisons, and
a decree was issued by Louis XIV, forbidding apothecaries to
sell arsenic, sublimate, or any drug reputed to be a poison
except to persons known to them. It further required, that
the purchaser should sign a register declaring the purpose for
which he was buying the poison. A similar condition had
been imposed by the local authorities in MontpelHer about
twenty years previously, but Louis applied it to the whole
•country.
The priests of Notre-Dame at length became appalled at the
number of self-accusations of murder by poison made to them
in the confessional, and conveyed an intimation of the fact
HISTORIC POISON CASES IN FRANCE 149
without names to Colbert and Louvois, then Ministers of
State. The authorities were placed on the alert, and by means
of a clue obtained from an intercepted letter, they arrested
the Chevalier de Vanens and the Count de Bachimont, who
were found to be secret purveyors of poisons. On private
examination, they implicated a large number of persons,
insomuch that a judicial commission was appointed by Louis
XIV, by which strict justice was done, without distinction of
person, condition or sex. It sat for three years and was
known as the Chambre Ardente, or Chamber of Poisons, and
was established at the Arsenal near the Bastille.
The stir and mystery made by the examinations of this
Court apparently drew more attention to the study of poisons
than before, and many began to learn how to employ them,
with the object of succeeding to heritages or of ridding them-
selves of persons they disliked.
Among those arrested and brought before the Court were
members of some of the noblest families of France, together
with magistrates, priests and a number of women, who had
practised as witches, fortune-tellers, sages-femmes and poison-
ers. Confessions which were extracted from these people by
torture showed that systematic poisoning had for some time
been carried out by the ladies of the court of the Grand
Monarque. One of thedealers in poisons, named La Voisin, is
said to have amassed in a few years a sum of money equivalent
to ;f20,ooo. Another is said to have earned ;fi,6oo a year,
which is hardly to be wondered at, when it was revealed that
Madame de Montespan had paid fifty crowns for a love philtre,
and another lady one hundred louis d'or for a powder to
administer to her husband. La Voisin and her accomplices
were eventually condemned and burned at the stake, which
seemed to check for a time the series of terrible crimes which
spread through France during the eighteenth century.
Shortly before this the whole of the country had been aroused
by the remarkable case of the Marquise de Brinvilliers, who con-
fessed to having poisoned her father, two brothers and a sister,
together with a number of people whose existence she found
inconvenient, or who simply bored her. Apparently when
she had no serious business on hand, she practised her art on
the patients in the hospitals which she visited under the
150 POISON MYSTERIES
pretence of charity. This woman, who stands in history
as the most infamous of all poisoners of whom we have
record, was named Marie Madeleine D'Aubray, the daughter
of a magistrate named Dreux D'Aubray. She was born on
July 22, 1630, and was the eldest of five children, all of whom
came to occupy positions of importance. She received a
better education than most women of her time, but her
religious instruction appears to have been wholly neglected.
According to the priest who ministered to her before she paid
the penalty of her crimes, she was destitute of even a rudi-
mentary knowledge of religion, and she appeared to have had
no moral training whatever. Of a passionate temperament and
extraordinary energy in anything that might serve for the
gratification of her desires, she had a most complex nature,
which was at once sensitive to anything that touched her
vanity or self-love.
In 165 1, at the age of twenty-one, she married Antoine
Gobelin, the Marquis de Brinvilliers, a lineal descendant of
the founder of the famous tapestry manufactory. He is said
to have had an income of 30,000 livres a year, and his wife
brought him another 200,000 as a dowry.
The marquise at that time is said to have been a particularly
beautiful woman, and both she and her husband began their
married life with every prospect of happiness. In 1659 they
made the acquaintance of a Captain Sainte-Croix, a young
man of good family and who was an officer in a cavalry regi-
ment. He became a constant visitor to the house, and so
ingratiated himself with both the marquise and her husband
that he eventually took up his residence with them.
At the time that Sainte-Croix came to live with the Brin-
villiers there were several children in the house under the
care of a tutor, named Briancourt, who also was said to be one
of the many lovers of the marquise . The marquis himself seems
to have developed a distrust of his wife, and was ever on the
watch ; whether he had gleaned some knowledge of her enthu-
siasm in the study of poisons or not, it is difficult to say, but it
is stated that at dinner he always took care that Sainte-Croix
sat on the lady's right, while he occupied a place near the
sideboard. He was waited on by a servant particularly
attached to his person, whom he instructed never to change
HISTORIC POISON CASES IN FRANCE 151
his glass, and to rinse it out whenever he served him with
wine.
Although suspicious that his wife was making attempts
to poison him — and there is little doubt she was attempting
to do so — the marquis was not without medical care. She
would occasionally call in a Dr. Brayer, one of the most
famous physicians in Paris of the day. According to Madame
de Sevigne, Brinvilliers owed his life on these occasions not
so much to his wife as to the fear of her lover, who did not
relish the idea of marrying her. She states that " while the
marqguise ave her husband poison Sainte-Croix gave him
antidotes, so that after being tossed like a ball from one to
the other in this way five or six times, now poisoned, now
restored, he remained alive."
As a result of these experiences the marquis suffered from
chronic weakness in the lungs. He always carried about
with him a box of the theriaca or treacle of Andromachus,
which was supposed to be a powerful antidote against poison.
This he not only took frequently himself, but also gave it to
his servants.
Sainte-Croix soon became notorious as the lover of the mar-
quise, and her father, on hearing of this, obtained a lettre de
cachet and had him arrested and imprisoned in the Bastille.
Now it so happened that the two Italians, Exali and his
confrere, were confined in the Bastille at the same time
under the charge of secret dealing in poisons. As already
stated, they had professed to be working in Paris in
conjunction with Glaser, a German apothecary. Another
account states that there is every reason to believe that
long before Sainte-Croix was committed to the Bastille,
he had studied the art of poisoning from this Christopher
Glaser, who was Apothecary in Ordinary to the King,
and author of a treatise on chemistry which had some
reputation. Glaser now not only instructed Sainte-Croix
but supplied him with poisons which he passed on to the
marquise. On the death of the marquis, whose property
had practically all vanished owing to the extravagance and
dissipation of his wife, Sainte-Croix, who had by that time
been released from prison, renewed his intrigue with the
marquise, who, eager for revenge on her father for having him
152 POISON MYSTERIES
imprisoned, and probably impatient to gain possession of the
money she would inherit at his death, conceived the idea of
using poison for the purpose of destroying his life.
One historian states that after Sainte-Croix had acquired
his knowledge of poisons from Glaser, he confided it to the
marquise, while others say that she got into direct touch
with Glaser, who gave her the necessary poison which she had
made up her mind to test for herself by experiment. This she
did with great cunning, assuming the character of one of the
Sisters of Charity, who visited the hospitals to relieve the
sick and suffering and bring them cakes, wine and other
luxuries. The recipients of her gifts generally soon died in
great suffering, but the significance of this apparently passed
unnoticed until some time afterwards. She also found sub-
jects for her experiments among her servants, one of whom,
Roussel, gave evidence at her trial at a later date and declared
that her mistress had one day given her some gooseberry jam
on the point of a knife and that it made her ill. She also
affirmed that the marquise had given her some ham " which
gave her great pain, and she felt as if she had been pricked in
the heart, after which she was ill for three years."
When the marquise had satisfied herself that her method
of administration was not likely to be easily discovered, she
turned her attention to its use for her own purposes, and her
first victim was her father. Apparently she administered
poison to him in repeated doses, and it was not until eight
months had passed that D'Aubray died in great agony. After
his death she lived still more riotously and with the greatest
extravagance, contracting very heavy debts until she ran
through all the money she had obtained.
It is stated at this time that the marquise developed " a
demoniac temper and inhuman cunning, such as perhaps no
mortal ever exhibited."
She next began to plot to get rid of her two brothers, with
the result that one of them died after three months of
great suffering, and the other a few months later. She
then tried to poison her sister in the same manner, but
suspicion being aroused, she gave up the attempt. On the
death of her second brother, the medical attendants insisted
on examining the body after death, and declared that he had
HISTORIC POISON CASES IN FRANCE 153
been poisoned ; so little, however, was his sister suspected,
that the actual murderer, a servant named La Chaussee
whom the marquise bribed and introduced into her brother's
house for the purpose of administering the poison, had a
legacy left to him by his victim for his devoted services. At
length suspicion appears to have fallen on the marquise and
Sainte-Croix, owing to an accident which happened to him
after his reimprisonment. It is stated that when engaged
in preparing his poisons he was accustomed to wear a
mask, presumably to prevent him inhaling the fumes of the
chemicals which he was using. While thus engaged, he was
found one day in a state of unconsciousness in his cell and
never recovered. The authorities, on examining his effects,
came across a small box to which a paper was attached
which contained a request that after his death it should be
delivered to the " Marquise de Brinvilliers who resides at the
rue Neuve Saint-Paul." The paper was signed and dated by
Sainte-Croix, May 25, 1672, and on the box being opened it
was found to contain a number of poisons of different kinds
with labels attached. It is also said that he kept in this box
a number of compromising letters which he had received
from her, together with bonds for large sums which she had
given him as hush-money in the matter of her brother's murder.
According to another account, as "no relations of his were
known, the authorities proceeded to put seals upon his pro-
perty. When the inventory was taken a casket was found,
which was opened, and the first article discovered in it was a
written document, which ran thus : —
" I humbly entreat those into whose hands this casket
shall fall to do me the favour to place it in the very hands of
Madame de BrinvilUers, who resides in the Rue Neuve Saint
Paul, the contents appertaining to her and to her only, and being
moreover of no use to any one else in the world. In the event
of her death taking place before mine, it is my desire that the
casket and all its contents be burned, unopened and undis-
turbed ; and that none may plead ignorance, I swear by God
whom I adore, and by everything that is most sacred, that
nothing is here said save what is most true ; and if, by any
chance, my request be contravened, just and proper as they
are in this point, I charge such contravention upon their
154 POISON MYSTERIES
conscience, both in this world and in the next, in discharge
of mine own conscience. And this I say and sign as my
last will.
" Signed, De Sainte-Croix.
" Done at Paris, this afternoon of the 25th day of May,
1.672."
Underneath were added the following words : —
" There is one single packet, addressed to M. Penautier,
which must be restored to him."
" Precautions too elaborate frequently produce an effect the
opposite of that intended," says the historian. " If in this
casket, which was securely locked up, there had been the mere
words, 'This casket belongs to Madame de Brinvilliers,'
it is probable that it would have been forwarded to her un-
opened, but the very style of the injunction was calculated
to arouse suspicion. The casket was opened, and an inven-
tory made of its contents, and the following is the description
of this deposit which was so solemnly placed under the
safeguard of God and of all things sacred " : —
1. A packet, sealed with eight seals of various armorial
bearings, and endorsed : " Papers to be burned in the case of
my death, they being of no value to any one. I most humbly
entreat that they be burned by whomsoever may find them.
I even charge it upon their conscience to do this, and to do it
without opening the packet." In this packet was enclosed
another, which contained sublimate.
2. Another packet, secured by six seals of various armorial
bearings, similarly endorsed, and enclosing another packet,
consisting of a pound and a half of sublimate.
3. Another packet, secured by six seals of different armorial
bearings, in which were three other packets, one containing
half an ounce of sublimate, a second containing two ounces
of Roman vitriol, and the third calcined and prepared vitriol.
4. A large square phial full of a clear light liquid, the quality
of which could not at the moment be ascertained.
5. Another phial of light-coloured liquid, at the bottom of
which was a whitish sediment.
6. A small earthenware jar, in which was a quantity of
prepared opium.
HISTORIC POISON CASES IN FRANCE 155
7. A folded paper, in which were two drachms of corrosive
sublimate, in powder.
8. A small box containing " Infernal Stone."
9. A paper containing an ounce of opium.
10. A piece of regulus of antimony, weighing three ounces.
11. A packet of powder marked. . . .
12. A packet secured by six seals, superscribed like those
already described. This packet contained twenty-seven
pieces of paper, on each of which were the words, " several
curious secrets."
The first care of the civil authorities was directed to a care-
ful examination of these substances, to have them analysed,
and to experiment with them upon animals.
The result of that examination and those experiments was
very curious, and the following is the report which was made
by the chemists and men of science to whom the examination
was entrusted.
" This artful poison " [it runs] " defies the researches
attempted to be made into its nature ; it is so disguised that
it cannot be detected — so subtle that it defies all the science
and ability of the doctors. Upon this poison all experiments
blunder, all rules are false, and all aphorisms absurd.
" The most certain and usual experiments are made by
means of the elements, or upon the bodies of animals. In
water the weight of the poison precipitates ; it is the superior
must needs be precipitated. No less sure is the action of
fire ; it evaporates, it dissipates, it consumes all that is inno-
cent and all that is impure, with the exception of a sharp
and acrid substance which alone can resist its effects. Upon
animals the effect of poison is even more obvious ; it carries
malignity into every part which it touches, vitiating, burning,
and \yithering up the whole internal economy as with a strange
fire.
" The poison of Sainte-Croixhas been subjected to all trials ;
it defies all the skill and science of the doctors, and mocks
and baffles all experiments. This poison swims in water
instead of sinking, and it escapes from the test of fire, leaving
behind only a mild and innocent substance. In animals it
so completely hides itself that it cannot be detected ; all the
parts of the poisoned animal remain living and sound even
while it is shedding death all around it.
156 POISON MYSTERIES
" All sorts of experiments have been tried upon this poison.
In the first instance some drops of a liquor contained in one
of the phials were poured into oil of tartar and water. No.
precipitate was formed in the vessel.
" In the second experiment some of the same liquid was
poured into a sanded vessel, the sand retained no acridly
tasting substance. The third experiment was made upon a
turkey hen, a pigeon, and a dog ; they died in a brief space,
and on their being opened on the following day, only some
coagulated blood was found in the ventricles of the heart.
" Another experiment was made with some white powder,
which was given, with some mutton, to a cat. The cat
vomited for half an hour, and on the following day was found
dead ; it was opened, and no interior part showed marks of
the action of the poison. A second trial of the same poison
was made upon a pigeon, which died in a short time. When
opened the bird had only some red liquid in its stomach."
" Such," according to the historian, " was the dying present
of Sainte-Croix to his mistress. His past crimes being in-
sufiicient to gratify his malignity, he was fain to be the
accomplice of future crime." '"■
According to Dr. Nass, Sainte-Croix died a natural death
after an illness of several months. To continue the story,
when the marquise heard of his death and the discovery
of the box, she at once made every effort to obtain it by
bribing the officials, but failing in this she fled to England,
and after much negotiation between Louis XIV and Charles
II as to her extradition, she escaped to Holland, where she
took refuge in various convents, until at last she was arrested
at Liege. She attempted to commit suicide by swallowing
fragments of broken glass and pins, and other methods, which
are described by Madame de Sevigne.
A romantic story is told of her arrest, which was made by an
officer called Des Grais, who was sent from Paris to apprehend
her. Finding he was unable to remove her forcibly from the
convent, he disguised himself in the dress of an abbe and so
found access and the means of making her acquaintance.
Assuming the character of a lover he induced her in this way
to accompany him on a pleasure excursion, but once outside
the building he arrested her and conveyed her to Paris.
After the marquise had fled, La Chaussee, the servant
MARGUERITE D AUBRAY, MARQUISE DE BRINVILLIERS.
(By Lebrun.)
Drawn from life at the time of her being taken to execution.
HISTORIC POISON CASES IN FRANCE 157
whom she used as her tool, fell under suspicion, was arrested,
brought to trial, and, after confessing to being the instrument
of several murders, was broken alive on the wheel in 1673.
The discovery of these terrible crimes attributed to Brin-
villiers, and the revelations made in documents which had
come into the possession of the authorities amounting to a
confession of her numerous miurders, caused a great sensation,
not only in Paris but throughout the whole of France.
The scene at her trial was intensely dramatic, and even the
judges were greatly moved. The marquise herself kept up a
bold front and showed the greatest resolution, in spite of the
evidence stoutly denying all the charges brought against her.
She was confronted with her former lover Briancourt, the
tutor, to whom it is said she confided all the secrets of her
crimes. The evidence was for the most part unquestioned,
and she was found guilty and sentenced on July 16, 1676. It
is recorded as follows : —
" The Court has declared and declares the said D'Aubray
de Brinvilliers duly attainted and convicted of having pro-
cured the poisoning of M. Dreux D'Aubray, her father, and
the said Messrs. D'Aubray, Civil Lieutenant and Councillor
in the said Court, her two brothers, and attempted the life
of the late Teresa D'Aubray, her sister, and by way of repara-
tion has condemned and condemns the said D'Aubray de
Brinvilliers to make public apology in front of the principal
door of the Church of Paris, whither she will be taken in a
cart, with bare feet and a rope round her neck, holding in her
hands a lighted torch of two pounds weight, and there on her
knees to say and declare that wickedly, and in order to possess
their goods, she procured the poisoning of her father and her
two brothers, and attempted the life of her deceased sister,
of which she repents and asks pardon of God, the King, and
the law : this done, taken and conveyed in the same cart
to the Place de Greve of this city, to have her head cut off
there on a scaffold to be erected for the purpose in the said
place ; her body burnt, and the ashes thrown to the winds.
She is first to be put to the question, ordinary and extra-
ordinary, in order to obtain a disclosure of her accomplices."
She heard the sentence with courage, and during the time
previous to its being carried out was visited by a Jesuit priest
named Pirot, who was a doctor of the Sorbonne and a man of
158 POISON MYSTERIES
great intelligence. It was his hope to induce her to reveal the
names of her accomplices, the compositions of the poisons she
used and the antidotes that would nullify their effects. She
a^ccepted his ministrations with graceful courtesy and is said to
have convinced him of her penitence and made a full con-
fession of the crimes she had committed. According to her
account, the only poisonous substances she ever used were
arsenic, vitriol and toad venom.
At first she said, " I do not know exactly what they were,"
but shortly before her death she remarked, " I should like to
know the composition of the poisons which I used and which
were used at my direction, but all I know about them is that
there was toad's venom and that there were some that con-
sisted of rarefied arsenic."
It is quite possible that she may not have known of the
composition of some of them, as they were probably originally
compounded by Glaser, who was a skilled chemist and well
versed in the science of his time.
The only antidote she stated that she knew was milk, and
her only accomplices Sainte-Croix and certain lackeys.
On July i6, 1676, when she was taken to the scene of
execution, an enormous crowd had assembled. " Never,"
says Madame de Sevigne, " had any seen such a crowd, or Paris
so excited or so interested." The marquise drew herself to
her feet in the cart with her eyes flashing and cried out in a
loud voice charged with contempt, " You have come to see a
fine spectacle."
Such is the tragic story of Marie Madeleine de Brinvilliers.
She is described by contemporary writers as with the face
that one might expect, " degraded by excesses, and distorted
by evil passions, but with features extremely regular, with a
rounded face that was full and beautiful and a certain look
which seemed to breathe goodness."
A great deal has been written in France about her supposed
knowledge of poisons, and her great skill in using them for
criminal purposes ; in reality, she was but a murderess of the
common type, in whom sensuality, cunning and vice were
combined.
The execution of the Marquise de Brinvilliers did not,
however, put a stop to the extraordinary wave of criminal
HISTORIC POISON CASES IN FRANCE 159
poisoning that passed over France towards the end of
the seventeenth century. During the reign of the Grazd
Monarque, briUiant and ghttering though it was, the vices
of avarice and jealousy led many to unscrupulous practices
and crime. In this state of society it was little to be wondered
at that Paris swarmed with fortune-tellers, astrologers,
sorcerers and others of their kind who made enormous sums
of money out of their dupes. Many of these combined the
sale of poisons with actual pratice, and claimed to be
able to accomplish almost any crime, from the removal of
an inconvenient husband to anyone who stood in the way
to an inheritance.
The papers of one of these Italian adventurers, named Primi
Visconti, were discovered and translated a few years ago, and
throw some light on the methods of these parasites of society.
Visconti, who had obtained entry to the French court by his
professed skill in palmistry and chiromancy and had become
somewhat popular with the courtiers, relates that it had come
to the King's knowledge that the infamous Sainte-Croix had
sought to obtain the position of maitre d'hotel in the palace
of Versailles, and had been recommended to the position by a
wealthy and avaricious person named Penaultier, Receiver-
General of the Clergy, who was also suspected of being
concerned in the recent crimes.
About 1677 the Ministers of the State awoke to the fact
that it was time something was done to put a stop to these
practices. Colbert and Louvois issued instructions to the
police to keep a sharp look-out for cases of poisoning. An
official record states that some years before 1677 and up to
the end of 1678 the judges and magistrates of the city of Paris
and its neighbourhood, as well as the Secretary of State, had
noticed that of the number of criminals and malefactors
whom they had caused to be arrested for ordinary offences,
the greater number were charged by declarations, death-bed
depositions or information given to the Government " with
complicity in, or knowledge of different poisonings carried out
on different persons of all sorts and conditions, who had in
consequence died."
The Chamhre de Paisons or Chambre Ardenie previously
referred to, sat in all 210 times until July 21, 1682, and
i6o POISON MYSTERIES
during that period dealt with charges against 442 persons,
and ordered the arrest of 367 ; 218 were kept prisoners, 36
were executed, 2 died in prison, 5 were sent to the gallows,
and 23 were banished.
In spite of this it is said that the worst criminals escaped,
owing to influence that they brought to bear in their favour.
"The chief culprits," says Ravaisson, "belonged to the
nobility or the law, and almost all of them had amongst the
members of the court friends, clients or relatives." The King
had set a bad example by allowing some individuals who
were compromised to go free. The judges had not the courage
to be more severe, and the weight of the condemnations fell
almost entirely on the miserable creatures who sold the poisons
and not on those who bought and used them.
An example of the class alluded to were two women called
La Vigoureux and La Voisin and a priest named Le Sage who
were first arrested and then tried for carrying on a trade in
poisons. They made themselves out to be practitioners in
necromancy, claiming to raise the spirits of the departed for
those who wished and to supply love philtres to those who
desired them. Their rooms were constantly visited by people
of position and others, many probably out of curiosity, as
has been the case with fashionable fortune-tellers of a later
date. La Voisin, however, kept a list of her clients, and on
her arrest, when this was discovered, they were also arrested
and brought to private trial before the Chambre. The list
contained such names as the two nieces of Cardinal Mazarin,
the Duchesse de Bouillon and the Comtesse de Soissons.
At the trial of the Duchess nothing could be proved beyond
her statement that she had resorted to Le Sage to consult him
as a fortune-teller. Lie also claimed to be able to show her
even the Devil himself. La Reine, one of the judges of the
court, was indiscreet enough to ask the Duchess if this had
taken place and if she had ever seen the Devil ? The lady
quickly replied that she saw him at that very moment, that
he was extremely ugly and very hideous, and appeared to her
in the guise of her questioner.
The charge brought against the Comtesse de Soissons and
the Marshal de Luxembourg was more serious. The three
criminals claimed to know the secret of a particularly poison-
HISTORIC POISON CASES IN FRANCE i6i
ous powder which they prepared, and to which they gave
the name of the poudre de succession, so called from the
real or supposed frequency with which it had been used to
hasten or change the succession in the families of the rich. The
names of those who obtained possession of it had been reported
to the Government. It is said that the King intimated to
the countess that if she was guilty she had better escape by
flight. Although she declared her innocence, she said she
could not endure the scandal of a public trial and fled to
Brussels, where she died in 1708.
With respect to the marshal, his explanation of his con-
nection with the infamous trio was that he had consulted
them in order to recover some lost papers of value. He had
done this through the medium of a man named Bonard ;
Le Sage swore, however, that the marshal had applied to him
to poison a woman who had possession of the papers and
refused to give them up. His accomplices testified that they
had accordingly poisoned her and disposed of the body into
the river at the instigation of the marshal. The marshal was
imprisoned and placed in a dungeon six and a half feet long,
where he fell sick and remained five weeks before being
brought to trial. The trial of the marshal was prolonged
fourteen months, when he was finally released without being
condemned or acquitted. La Voisin, La Vigoureux, together
with Le Sage, the priest, were eventually convicted and
burned alive in Paris.
The Chambre Ardente came to an end after being criti-
cized as a political tribunal v/hich did little to effect the purpose
for which it was designed.
According to later writers, the famous poudre de suc-
cession, consisted of arsenic, sometimes mixed with vegetable
poisons such as aconite, belladonna and opium.
Among the substances believed to be deadly was powdered
diamond, for which powdered glass was probably substituted.
Another writer states that poudre de succession appears to
have been composed of sugar of lead. Nail-parings and
powdered lobster claws were used for a similar purpose.
Vegetable poisons — opium, hemlock, belladonna, euphorbium,
and many other poisonous plants — are also mentioned,
and one enterprising Frenchwoman, who had been to the
L
i62 POISON MYSTERIES
West Indies, appears to have had the idea of importing curare
taken from poisoned arrows.
There seems little doubt that in the eighteenth century,
when the practice became almost a cult, poison was sometimes
secretly administered by means of a clyster, the use of which
was so common at the time. Arsenic, corrosive sublimate,
cantharides and opium are said to have been given in this way.
Louis XVIII of France is said to have narrowly escaped
death by poison in 1804. At that time he was living under the
name of the Comte de Lille near Warsaw, and had in his house-
hold a servant named Coulon, a French adventurer, who had
been a prisoner of war at Portsmouth and arrived in the Polish
city in 1803. He declared that he was approached in July,
1804, by two emissaries "charged to poison Louis XVIII, his
wife, and also the Duke and Duchess d'Angouleme," who were
living with the royal couple. The emissaries offered him
four hundred louis d'or if he would place in the soup served
to the King and his family some hollow can'ots filled with
poison. A postchaise would await Coulon to carry him at
once to France, where the regicide would be asked no questions
so long as his victim was a Bourbon. Coulon accepted the
carrots, but denounced the couple. Part of Poland was
then subject to Prussia, and the Prussian police appear to
have been singularly averse to taking action in the matter,
and allowed the two emissaries to escape. This circumstance,
coupled with the fact that Napoleon was all-powerful at the
period, and the supposition that the man who ordered the
Due d'Enghien to be shot was capable of compassing the
death of other Bourbons, gave rise to the suspicion that the
plot was really set on foot by Napoleon's police. Louis
XVIII requested that Coulon might be arrested and the
carrots officially analysed, but the Prussian authorities refused
to act.
" Seeing that it was impossible to rely either upon the law
or the Prussian police," the narrator continues, " d'Avray went
with Dr. Lefevre, the King's physician, to call upon Dr.
Gazatkiewick, one of the most celebrated practitioners of
Warsaw. Here, in the presence of a second physician.
Dr. Bagenzorve, and of M. Guidal, a local pharmacist, the
seals placed by the Archbishop on Coulon 's packet were
HISTORIC POISON CASES IN FRANCE 163
broken. The three carrots therein contained were opened
and found to be filled with a sort of paste formed of three
arsenics, yellow, white and red."
A report was drawn up and handed to M. de Tilty, head of
the city police, but he declined to take any notice, saying the
affair was outside his province.
The question of the various poisons used during this period
in France for criminal purposes has been ably discussed by
Dr. Lucien Nass, who has had access to the documents relating
to the various important trials that took place. He says,
that -according to police inventories of articles found in the
domiciliary visits made by them in the course of their inquiries
into these poisoning cases, many substances were employed.
If one failed another was tried. The method of adminis-
tration was varied with considerable ingenuity, and arsenic,
opium, cantharides and lead acetate were the substances
mostly employed.
CHAPTER XV
THE MYSTERY OF AMY ROBSART'S DEATH
THE mystery attending the death of Amy Robsart, the
wife of Robert Dudley, who eventually became Earl
of Leicester, is one which, owing to the lack of detailed docu-
mentary evidence, is never likely to be entirely solved. So^
much has been written concerning the troubled life of this
unfortunate lady and its sad ending, that a brief outline of
her story, which has been gathered from the most reliable
sources, is all that is necessary here.
She was born about the year 1532 and was the daughter of
Sir John Robsart of Sidestern in Norfolk, whose wife was the
widow of one Roger Appleyard.
Where she first met Robert Dudley is not known, but they
were married at Sheen (Richmond) on June 4, 1550. The
wedding is recorded by Edward VI (who was present at the
ceremony) in his journal. Dudley was master of the King's
buckhounds and was knighted by him. At the time of her
marriage Amy Robsart was probably eighteen, while Dudley
is said to have been about the same age.
Of the first ten years of their married life little is known,
but on Elizabeth's accession Sir Robert Dudley, who was on
terms of close friendship with the young queen, suddenly
became a personage of importance and received his title from
her. As the special favourite of his sovereign his position
at Court speedily became one of envy, to which was added the
jealousy of his rivals. It was freely rumoured that but for
the fact that he was already married, he stood a good chance
of becoming the royal consort.
The close intimacy of Queen Elizabeth and Dudley soon
became a public scandal, and during this time nothing is heard
of his wife, until the spring of 1560, when it was announced
164
THE MYSTERY OF AMY ROBSART'S DEATH 165
that she had gone to reside at Cumnor Place, a house
situated a few miles from Abingdon. Neglected and slighted
by her husband, whom she saw had been weaned from her,
the unhappy woman no doubt fell in readily with Dudley's
suggestion that she should take up her residence in this lonely
country house.
Cumnor Place was a stone-built residence of fair size, and
had formerly belonged to Doctor George Owen, who was
physician to Henry VHI. On his death he bequeathed the
estate to his son William, who had let it to one Anthony Foster,
a country squire who appears to have been well known to
Dudley.
At the time when Lady Amy Dudley took. up her residence
at Cumnor, there were living in the house beside Foster and
his wife, a Mrs. Odingselle, his sister-in-law, and Mrs. Owen,
who, according to Adlard, was the widow of Dr. George Owen,
the physician, and original owner of the property.
It is a noteworthy fact that very shortly after Lady Amy's
arrival rumours became current that her life was in danger.
It was also reported that she was ill, a story which was prob-
ably spread abroad with an object.
De Quadra, the Spanish Ambassador to the Court at the
time, in an extraordinary letter written from Windsor to King
Philip on September 11, 1560, bears evidence to these rumours
in the following words : "Lie [Cecil] ended by saying that
Robert [Dudley] was thinking of killing his wife, who was
publicly announced to be ill, although she was quite well, and
would take every care they did not poison her. The next
day the Queen told me as she returned from hunting that
Lord Robert's wife was dead, or nearly so, and begged me to
say nothing about it."
"Since writing the above," he continues, "I hear the
Queen has published the death of Robert's wife and said in
Italian, ' She broke her neck.' "
One must assume from this letter, which was written only
three days after Lady Amy's death, that she had been aware
that an attempt had been made to poison her.
To return to the story. On Sunday, September 8, a fair was
being held at Abingdon, and according to the statement of
Dudley's own kinsman Thomas Blount, Lady Amy insisted
i66 POISON MYSTERIES
on her servants, who were much attached to her, going to the
fair. Of the tragic events that followed, very little is known.
Amy dined alone that day with Mrs. Owen ; Foster, his wife
and sister-in-law being, it is presumed, in the house. When
the servants returned to Cumnor late that night, they found
their mistress lying dead at the foot of a short staircase that
led from her bedchamber to the ground floor. It was
announced the next day that the unfortunate lady had fallen
down the stairs and broken her neck.
The news was at once sent to Dudley at Windsor, who made
no attempt to go to Cumnor himself, but wrote to his relative
Thomas Blount, requesting him to go and investigate the
matter and instructing him to see that the Coroner made a
searching inquiry as to the cause of his wife's death.
He also notified Amy's half-brother, John Appleyard, and
asked him to proceed to Cumnor to assist Blount.
All that is known of the inquiry that followed is told in two
letters written by Blount to Dudley.
In one of these he suggests that Lady Amy had become
insane, " for," he says, " the tales I do heare of her make me
to think she had a strange minde." He further informs
Dudley that he had met several of the jury who had been
chosen for the inquest, and that " they be verie secrete and
yet do I heare a whysperinge that they can find no presump-
cions of evill."
In a letter written by Dudley to Blount, he mentions having
" received a letter from one Smythe, one that seamethe to
be foreman of the jurye. I perseve by his letter that he and
the rest hath and do travill verie diligentlie and circumspectlie
for the tryall of that matter whiche they have charge of ;
and for anything I hear, that by any serche or examinacione
they can make in the world hitherto, it doth plainlie appeare
he saith, a verie mysfortune, which for my own parte, cousin
Blount, dothe much satisfie and quiet me."
From this it would appear that the foreman of the jury was
in communication with Dudley and even foreshadowed their
verdict, which appears to have been that Lady Amy Dudley
had met her death by accident.
She was buried with considerable ceremony at the Univer-
sity Church of St. Mary at Oxford on September 22, 1560.
THE MYSTERY OF AMY ROBSART'S DEATH 167
The inquest probably lasted several days, but no report of the
proceedings or of the actual verdict of the jury is to be found.
There must have been such a report, as it is recorded that
a copy was made for and received by John Appleyard, Amy
Dudley's half-brother, who on June 4, 1567, wrote to the
Council that he had read, and on June 3 had returned the
document. In which verdict he not only finds such proofs
testified under the oath of fifteen persons how his late sister
" hy misforti.ne happened of death."
Reports that Dudley was responsible for his wife's death
were soon spread abroad and discussed throughout the coun-
try, and even in France public feeling was strong against him.
At a meeting of the Privy Council in April, 1566, called to
consider the propriety of giving sanction to the marriage
between the Queen and Dudley (then Earl of Leicester) it
was urged against the proposal that Leicester was " infamed
by the deth of his wife."
Anthony Wood, who visited Cumnor a centiury after the
tragedy, records the local tradition that, " those who plotted
against Amy Dudley's life took advantage to convey her to
another chamber where her bed s head should stand against
a door which she did not know of. In the middle of the night
came a man with a spitt in his hand, open the privy door and
run ye spitt into her head and tumbled her downstairs."
This story is most unlikely, as evidence of foul play would
have been at once noticed, and the coroner at the inquest
apparently failed to discover any trace of a blow or external
injury.
John Aubrey, who next described the event after Wood,
states, "she was either stifiled or strangled before being
thrown downstairs," which is a more probable theory.
Camden's story of the event is as follows : —
" She was prevailed upon to visit Cumnor-house, the seat
of Antony Foster, one of Leicester's creatures. There the
unfortunate lady became ill, — the consequence of the infernal
practices upon her,— which however produced their effect
too slowly to answer the desired end. She was importuned
by Foster and his tool Vamey, to take medicine for her dis-
order. They, seeing her sad and heavy, as one that well
knew by her other handling, that her death was not far off,
i68 POISON MYSTERIES
began to persuade her, that her present disease was melan-
choly, and other humours, and would needs counsel her to
take some potion. This she absolutely refusing to do (as
suspecting the worst), they sent a messenger for Dr. Bayly,
professor of Physic, in Oxford University, and entreated him
to persuade her to take some little potion, by his direction.
They would fetch the same at Oxford, meaning to have added
something of their own for her comfort, as the doctor, upon
just cause and consideration did suspect, seeing their great
importunity, and the small need the lady had of physic, and
therefore he peremptorily denied their request."
Before considering the probable cause of Lady Amy Dud-
ley's tragic death according to the present available evidence,
several curious and significant events that followed must be
mentioned. Antony Foster, who held Cumnor Place on lease
at the time, about twelve months after the tragedy, became
the proprietor of the estate, and on his death bequeathed it to
Dudley, then Earl of Leicester. In 1567 Appleyard, Amy
Dudley's half-brother, who was sent by Dudley with Blount
to be present at the inquest, confessed that certain of the jury
had been bribed. He bore a very indifferent character.
It is also another notable fact that the Privy Council books
of this period and the report of the Coroner's inquest and
verdict are missing, and have never been discovered.
Dudley's relations with the Queen formed a powerful motive
for a man of his unscrupulous character to compass his wife's
life. There were strong suspicions against him of having
been concerned in the poisoning of several persons who he
thought had stood in his path. He carefully refrained from
going to Cumnor in person and also from attending the funeral
of his wife.
In reviewing the fragmentary story of the events at Cumnor,
the tragedy must have occurred between dinner time and
midnight, when the servants probably returned from the fair
and found the lifeless body of their mistress with her neck
broken lying at the foot of the staircase. This staircase is
said to have been a short winding stone flight connecting the
first floor with the hall. Although her neck was broken, it
was remarked, curiously enough, that a hood or cap she
wore on her head was not disarranged. This fact is mentioned
THE MYSTERY OF AMY ROBSART'S DEATH 169
in a letter printed in 1584, now in the Bodleian library, entitled,
" The Copie of a leter wryten by a master of arte of Cambridge
to his friende in London "; in it is stated, " She had the
chaunce to fal from a paire of stares and so to break her
neck, but yet without hurting of her hoode that stoode upon
her heade."
Presumably there were in the house on the fatal Sunday
night, Foster and his wife, Mrs. Odingselle, Mrs. Owen and
Foster's servants, yet we must assume that if, as alleged, the
unfortunate lady did accidentally fall down the staircase, none
of these people were aware of it. It was left for her own
servants to find her body on their return from Abingdon,
probably late at night. It is hardly conceivable that she
could have fallen without noise of any kind.
She was evidently aware that attempts had been made to
poison her, but we know not whom she specially suspected
or how these attempts were made.
Apparently she did not suspect Mrs. Owen, with whom she
dined alone on the fatal night, yet Mrs. Owen had been the
wife of a physician and doubtless had some knowledge of drugs,
and like other ladies of the time doubtless knew also how to
prepare them.
Although the report of the inquest is missing and we are
ignorant of the proceedings and evidence given, even if this
interesting document were discovered it would not prove
conclusively how Lady Amy Dudley came by her death.
We do not know if any medical evidence was called at the
inquest or if an autopsy was made to discover the cause of
death. There was probably no post-mortem, as the broken
neck would doubtless be considered sufficient evidence as to
the cause of death, and at that period only cases of sudden
death without external signs of disease or violence were
attributed to poison. There are records that post-mortem
examinations were sometimes made in the sixteenth century
on the bodies of those who were suspected of having been
poisoned, and a description of two such cases is given in a
previous chapter.
But although rough clinical tests are said to have been
attempted in those cases, no chemical tests were known at
that period capable of proving the presence of many poisons.
170 POISON MYSTERIES
Supposing opium had been given to Amy Dudley, an
autopsy, therefore, would have been of no avail, and in the
absence of direct evidence the poisoner would go undetected.
Taking all the circumstances of the case into consideration,
in conjunction with the meagre details of the tragedy that
have come down to us, it certainly does not appear probable
that Lady Amy's death was purely accidental.
Her husband's unscrupulous character was known. She
alone stood in the way of the realization of his great ambition
to marry the Queen. Elizabeth's words, that "none of his
were at the attempt at his wife's home," also add to the
strong suspicion that Dudley was the instigator of a plot
against his wife's life.
Let us suppose that previous attempts to administer poison
had been frustrated by the unfortunate lady's watchfulness,
as she was apparently aware of the designs against her life,
the opportunity suddenly afforded by the absence of all her
personal attendants from the house might have been seized
upon to make another and a surer attempt. It would be easy
to have introduced some narcotic such as opium or belladonna
into her wine at dinner, and after the opiate had taken effect,
it would be a still easier matter to precipitate her body down
the staircase, thereby causing an injury sufficient to give colour
to the statement that she had met her death by accident.
After all, proof in this case is practically impossible, and
whether Lady Amy Dudley was murdered or not, is a question
that will probably never be conclusively answered.
CHAPTER XVI
A POISON MYSTERY OF THE SEVENTEENTH
CENTURY
The Strange Case of Sir Euseby Andrew
ALONG-FORGOTTEN mystery which comes down to
us tinged with the romance of past centuries is that
surrounding the death of Sir Euseby Andrew. This worthy
baronet, whose family seat was at Charwelton in Northampton-
shire, was descended from an ancient stock well known in that
county. His father, when sheriff of the county, had attended
on Mary Queen of Scots at her execution at Fotheringay
Castle. The interesting story of the strange circumstances
which attended Sir Euseby's death are recorded by Dr. John
Cotta, a physician, who practised in Northampton in the
early part of the seventeenth century, and who committed
it to writing at the time.
It is evident from the account given by Doctor Cotta that
the baronet had been ailing for some time and that rumours
of foul play were abroad when he was summoned to attend
him. We give the narrative in the quaint phraseology of
the period as penned by the physician in his manuscript.
" I was sent for by Sir Euseby Andrew," he states, " in
his last extremities whereof he died, twice. First, by his
apothecary Nicholas Rawlings upon the Sunday before his
death. Secondly by his servant Euseby Barbon upon the
Tuesday before he died. I came then unto him altogether
ignorant of any project matter or mention of Poyson After
my coming he tolde me as he was able in weake manner of
fainting speach that I was welcome and that he desired to
speake with me before he died. After these words I left
him a while and went downe to seeke my servant. When
I returned, he asked me whether I had ever scene him sicke
formerly in that strange manner and torment wherein nov/e
171
172 POISON MYSTERIES
he was. My answer was that I had never seene him in that
manner. He then tolde me that he had been tormented in
that manner ever since he had taken a broth or gelhe.
" I demanded who gave him that gelhe, whether his
Physition. He answered No, but said there was fault therein
and further at that time did not proceede his strength sences
and speech so farr faylinge that no life was expected a great
space.
" Upon certain cordials administered, he, beyond all ex-
pectation both of myself and all present obtained unexpected
ease and remission of his extremities a large time though not
freed from them. Upon this hope by him conceived of his
recovery, the next day he abruptly uttered unto me these
words, videlicet. Doctor, how am I beholding unto you, I
hope now I shall live. If I live I will discover the strangest
practise or wonder that was ever heard of in Northampton-
shire, but if I die God will revenge it and I hope my brothers
will call my wrong into question —
" Hereto I answered nothing that day or the next ; he
relapsed againe and then uttered these words unto me, vide-
licet. Good Doctor lett me goe with you into Northampton,
I objected, his weakness for such a journey and his unfittness ;
he said he might be carried in his Coatch with a bed therein .
And the journey being objected as too much for him he then
desired he might go into Daventry being neare hand, wherein
I seemed no forward to satisfie him, he burst out into these
speeches, ' I am not safe, I am not secure in my owne house,
I would I were a poore sheppard that I might lie in the fieldes.'
After the passions uttered (the distance of time I do not remem-
ber) the Ladie Andrew his wife came unto him, and had some
speeche with him (but what it was I do not now remember)
but his reply was ' It is enough for you that I have desired
it, but since you brave me in my owne house and in this poore
distresse wherein I am, get you from me and come no more at
me until! I sende for you. You make her (quoth he) your
bedfellow your companion, I wot she is no companion for you;
at another time Sir Euseby fallinge into a new passion because
Mistress Moyle was not removed out of his house the Lady
Andrew intreated me to tell him that Mistress Moyle was
gone, which I was loth to say because I knew the contrary,
I notwithstanding to quallifie his discontented moans and
complaints did tell him, that I did heare that she was gone,
which my Ladye confirming likewise unto him, he suddenly
and briskly looked up and said ' you lie you know she shall
POISON MYSTERY OF THE XVIITH CENTURY 173
not goe.' About the same time or before, I do not well
remember, it was bruted by some in the house that Sir Euseby
did talke idly which he understanding by whom or what
means (I know not) he did call me unto him and wishing some
that stoode near to Stand apart, he uttered these words,
videlicet, ' Doctor, they would make you believe that I do
talke idly but because you shall know that I do not talke idly
I will give you my reasons why T suspect Mistress Moyle/
He then related that Jaquinto had told him of a bason stained
with gellie wherinto Mistress Moyle had cast salte, that
Jaquinto told him she was a bad woman and meant him no
good, and warned Mistress Francis his daughter to take heede
that Mistress Moyle came not neare her father's brothes or
gellies. He further said, that she was too officious aboute
him to rise at 3 or 2 a clock to give him gellie or broth. He
said further that after his taking of a gellie he immediately
did fall into vomiting and purging 20 times a day, 3 dayes
together, and into those torments of his stomache sides and
gutes which I did then see.
" He farther saide that Mistress Moyle had given forth
that he would not live past Tuesday, which daye (saide he)
I liad died in my owne feeling and in all others expectation,
that were present, if your coming into Charleston that night
had not by your Cordialls revived and kept me alive. He
saide farther, that Mistress Moyle did talke of burying him the
next day. He added farther, that Mistress Moyle when he
was in a sounding fitt did take the pillows and bolster from
under his head which afterward reviving he did misse and
call for as he saide. These things as his reasons of suspecting
Mistress Moyle he did deliver unto me, while T replied that
I was sorry that his minde was troubled with such things and
wondered that a stranger who seemed unto me a sober and
modest gentlewoman should intende any such mischief, he
thereto answered ' Good Doctor, be not led by them. You
are an honest man,' said he, 'they are too subtle for you.'
Thus we brake of conference for that time. Some hours
before his death he called for his clothes and said he could
arise and die in his clothes and not in his bed. In the mean
season some gentlemen did offer him a writing or instrument
to seal which he then refused, saying, ' I am now distracted
and troubled bring it again anone. I doubt the parson will
controvert some part of it.' After his clothes were put on
he did point and was ledd unto a chair near his bed, where he
did sit down and called for the formerly mentioned writing
174 POISON MYSTERIES
and viewed it, sett his hand unto it, sealed and deUvered
if. He then called for his will which he untied and brake the
seal and taking a pen begann to rase something therein, but
Mr. Thomas Andrews stayed his hand saying, ' Good brother
don't alter your will, I hope she will prove a good mother unto
her children,' by which Sir Euseby not seeming much moved,
another gentleman upon his knees thus spake unto him, ' Good
Sir, remember that you have almost been married together
these 20 years and you have had many sweet children together
and as you met in love so part in love.' Hereunto Sir Euseby
answered, ' I am contented,' and threw the pen from him and
delivered the will back again.
" Then he required to be laid upon his bed in his clothes
and called for the preachers to pray with him, which they did
until his strength and speech and senses failed him, and he
drew his wind very short and from that shortness of breath
did fall and lie gaping and now and then did take a gasp.
" After we nerby now supposed him dead he again revived
and feeling for his pocket did draw there out a seal and offered
it, saying, ' the boy, the boy.' He was demanded whether
he meant his eldest son— he answered ' Yea,' and putting
again his hand into his pocket he drew out a key, and added
it unto the seal. He then relapsed again a short time unto
drawing his wind short and gasping and then reviving again
said, ' My brothers, my brothers,' Who being called unto him
said ' Norton, Norton, I would have an honest use made
thereof and no more but an honest use.' This said, he then
relapsed again so long a space that I supposed him passed
reviving any more and I went down into the Court. There
after I had stayed some space and was called up again unto
him. When he did see me he said, ' O Doctor, I cannot
die,' ' Do you know the cause.' I answered, ' No.' He said,
' I will tell you. The angels have been about me this hour
and will not suffer me to die until I have made known that
Mistress Moyle is the cause of my death.' I did answer that
I was sorry to hear him so say for that it m.ay now be deemed
he died not in charity for that he did not forget and forgive.
He hereto replied, I do forgive her, but God commanded
the Angels and they would not suffer me to die until I had
thus spoken and now I shall die.' Upon these words a Knigh':
standing by said unto one Mr. Harrison a preacher, ' By
God you Divines are flatterers you should now tell him that
these angels are Devils.' Hereunto I answered I did not
take those words fitting but if Mr. Harrison, said I, you will
POISON MYSTERY OF THE XVIITH CENTURY 175
tell Sir Euseby that those his wordes may be deemed to
proceed from a sick brain or unto such purpose you may
do very well.
" Then Mr. Harrison said, ' Sir I beseech you remember
yourself, you speak such things as may breed much trouble
and you know you are going out of the world I pray you take
heed what you say.'
" Sir Euseby looking upon him shaking his head and gently
moving his hand towards him said, ' This is no time to lie
now.' And then did relapse again and never did look up
nor speake any more until he died."
That Mistress Moyle was charged with poisoning Sir Euseby
Andrew may 'be surmised from the concluding portion of
Doctor Cotta's manuscript, in which he relates his " evidence
given in open Court at the Assizes at Northampton three
several times upon commande."
He states : " My first reason that bredd suspition was for
that Sir Euseby Andrew did not seeme to me to die of that
disease whereof he had so long before languished, but of
another kinde.
" That he died of another kind is manifest. First, for that
the last disease whereof he died was an acute sharpe and swift
disease. The first disease whereof he had so long before
languished, was a chronicke ling'ring disease into which two
kinds Phisitions do divide all diseases.
" That the last disease was an acute disease is manifest,
for that as is the manner of an acute disease it was in his
motion swift and in his accidents and qualitie sharpe. This
was planely scene, for that immediately after the approach
of this latter disease Sir Euseby Andrew was driven to keepe
his chambre, was unable to stand upon his leggs, to sett up
in his bed whereby a general extreame anxietie and distresse
of all his body by continual vehement faintings and sound-
ings, by extreme torment of his stomache sides and gutes,
he was in a few days compelled to yield up the ghost.
" That the latter- disease was of another kind different
from the first, is yet farther manifest, namely, for that it
had accidents which were not in the first, that is a blackness
of the tongue, soreness and rawness of the throate and a
frank excoriation in the stomake found after his decease.
" If he died of a new disease that was a new cause and that
remaineth to be inquired into, whether poyson yea or noe,
which in my opinion may too justly be doubted for three
reasons following.
176 POISON MYSTERIES
" I. The first reason is, for that in the stomake of Sir
Euseby Andrew after his decease was found an usual effect
of a corroding fretting poyson namely an excoriation in the
stomake before mentioned without any probable or manifest
cause thereof within the body. That there was no manifest
or probable cause thereof within the body doth seeme to me.
As there was nether staine nor substance of any inbred humour,
so of sortie outward corroding matter there were manye pre-
stimptions in court deposed, namely, a bason and porringers
stained, the bason staininge gellie in the takinge dishked,
distasted after the takinge, within short time cast up againe,
and after it following extreme purginge, vomiting, torments
of stomake sides^ and gutts, continuing untill death wherof
were many witnesses of note and worth.
"2. The second reason is, for that the excoriation found
in the stomake had so suspitious a proportion with the sus-
pected gelhe which was deposed in Court to staine the Bason
and porringers and speedily after the taking to cause Sir
Euseby Andrew to grow sick, to purge, to vomit, to be ex-
tremely tormented in stomake, sides and gutts. The first
liquor of the suspected gellie was all cast away and fresh
liquor was added unto the same ingredients both which were
in Court deposed.
" That Sir Euseby Andrew his tonge was black and his
throate sore and raw was partly complained by himself while
he lived and partly seen by others, and as I conceive is not
denied by any —
"In Sir Euseby Andrew as also scene staines or spotts
upon his liver, and in his mouth, but whether without pro-
bable cause thereof within the body I referr unto the con-
sideration of the number and weyht of the signes of poyson
from without.
" There were many signes of some corrodinge matter or
poyson taken from without in or about Sir Euseby Andrew.
The signes deposed were these.
" First, a bason and Porringers stained with a gellie.
" Secondly, Sir Euseby Andrew his distate of that gellie
as soone as it was in his mouthe.
" Thirdly, his growing extreme sicke immediately after it
was swallowed downe.
" Fourthly, after his growing sicke a vehement purging and
vomiting, a fainting, and sounding and extreme torments of
his stomake sides and gutts, from which accidents in that
intense and vehement degree he was formerly free, as was
POISON MYSTERY OF THE XVIITH CENTURY 177
deposed in Court by a Physition whom he had formerly used
and who did see him in his last extremes likewise and as I
myselfe do know.
" Thus all signes of poison taken from without concurring,
and so many circumstances consenting in one and the selfe
same kinde and affirmative. I suppose I have sufficiently
made good my opinion.
" Therefor, Sir Euseby Andrew his disease accompanied
with all those signes concurring did arise from poyson taken
from without and not bredd within — And I take it the office
of every honest physition to speake the truth in the behalfe
of his distrissed patient espetially by himselfe when dying
therto required. This I hope will satisfie all intelligent in-
genuous minds.
" John Cotta."
Whether Mistress Moyle was found guilty of the crime or
not, the worthy physician does not say. Certainly his evidence
goes to prove that a crime had been committed, but by whom,
he gives us no indication, and the strange death of Sir Euseby
Andrew still remains among the mysteries which have never
been solved.
CHAPTER XVII
A MYSTERY OF THE AUSTRIAN COURT IN
THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY
IN the spring of the year 1670, Leopold I, Emperor of
Austria; was seized with a mysterious illness which
greatly puzzled his physicians. A staunch and fervent
Roman Catholic he was completely dominated by the Jesuit
party, who dubbed him " Leopold the Great," and received in
return for their commendation many tokens of his favour.
In spite of this friendship, however, seeing that the house of
Austria was tottering, for Leopold had no male descendants,
the fathers were engaged in secretly fomenting an insurrection
in Hungary which was supported by Louis XIV.
It was darkly hinted by some that the Emperor was being
poisoned by the Hungarian malcontents. One day the
papal nuncio was in conference with the sick monarch in his
cabinet concerning the insurrection which had just broken
out, and while they were in consultation a fresh despatch
arrived, which contained a long list of the persons implicated.
In this list appeared the name of Francis Borri. As the
name was read out by the secretary, the nuncio started.
" Borri ! " he exclaimed, " Have him arrested at once,
your Majesty. He is a most dangerous man and has contrived
to escape from the avenging arm of the Holy Ofhce." Within
a few hours afterwards, a Captain Scotti, of the Austrian Life
Guards, was despatched on a special mission to Goldingen to
arrest him.
Giuseppe Francesco Borri was a remarkable man. Born in
Milan in 1627, he left that city early in life for Rome, where he
studied medicine and alchemy. His scientific studies did not,
however, prevent him from taking a deep interest in other
subjects, and among these theology claimed a place. His
researches led him to doubt the supremacy of the Pope, and
178
A MYSTERY OF THE AUSTRIAN COURT 179
he began to deliver lectures claiming that the mysteries of
the faith were derived from the principles of chemistry.
The Jesuits at once obtained an order for his arrest through
the Inquisition, and the Pope offered a reward of 35,000 francs
to anyone who would deliver him up ; but Borri was on the
alert, and fled to Strasburg. His enemies in Rome, balked
of their prey, meanwhile had his name publicly exposed on the
gallows and his picture was burnt by the hangman. From
Strasburg he journeyed to Amsterdam, and there became
very popular as a physician, being besieged by patients who
offered him large fees for his services. He professed to be an
adept in toxicology and was learned in poisons and their
antidotes. Leaving Amsterdam, he proceeded to Hamburg,
where he made the acquaintance of Queen Christina and
acquired a great reputation for his skill in ophthalmic diseases.
For a few months he lived at the court of Copenhagen, but
desire coming over him to go to a warmer climate he left the
north with the object of settling in Stamboul.
On April 10, 1670, he arrived at Goldingen on the Silesian
border. But his enemies the Jesuits had not lost sight of him.
They played a waiting game, which proved successful in the
end, for the landlord of the house in which Borri lodged
communicated his guest's identity to the Jesuits at Vienna,
and he was arrested as a suspect by Captain Scotti on April 22.
Travelling in a carriage surrounded by an escort of cavalry
they at once set out for the capital. The captain happened
himself to be an Italian and treated his prisoner with every
consideration. He told him he was suspected of being con-
cerned in a conspiracy, and that he had the papal nuncio
among his opponents. " Then I realize the real cause of
my arrest," replied Borri.
Scotti also told him, in conversation, of the Emperor's
mysterious illness, which had baffled his physicians and which
was now supposed to be due to secret poisoning. Borri
expressed the opinion that if this was the case he could readily
discover the presence of a poison if one existed. He implored
the captain to inform the Emperor that if he really suspected
he was being poisoned he could free him from it, and was
incapable cf taking any revenge for the insult done by arresting
him. The captain promised to comply with his request.
i8o POISON MYSTERIES
On their arrival in Vienna on April 28, 1670, Borri was taken
to the Swan Inn and there lodged in a room which was guarded
by soldiers.
Weary and tired by his journey he at once threw himself
on the bed and fell asleep, but he was aroused during the
night by the door being opened. A man entered, wrapped in
a cloak and bearing a dark lantern. When he lighted the
room he saw it was Captain Scotti.
" Make haste and get ready," said the captain. " The
Emperor wishes to speak with you, for your reputation as a
physician is known to him. I mentioned your proposal to
him and his Majesty trusts you, but was obliged to wait till
night as he does not wish this visit to be known."
Borri thanked the captain and in a few minutes they
were walking through the dark and silent streets to the
palace. When they arrived, Scotti handed his prisoner
over to a chamberlain, who at once conducted him to the
Imperial antechamber and bade him be seated.
In about a quarter of an hour a gentleman of the bed-
chamber came in and made Borri a sign to follow him. They
passed through several apartments until they came to a
velvet-covered door which the conductor opened, and, drawing
back a heavy portiere, beckoned Borri to enter.
He found himself in the Emperor's cabinet, a gloomy room
lighted by a few candles which shed but a dim light. Pictures
of a religious character covered the walls, and by the side of
a small work-table stood a lofty prie-Dieu, over which hung
a finely carved crucifix. By the dim light Borri at length
discerned a little man seated in an arm-chair near the fable,
making impatient movements. He wore a green silk dressing-
gown and a cap with a -shade for his eyes. His feet were
wrapped up, his face was livid and his cheeks sunken.
Borri advanced and bowed.
"Are you the Milanese cavalier ? " the Emperor asked in
a trembling voice.
"At your Majesty's service," replied Borri.
" I am sorry to see you here as a prisoner, but you are not
one at present," said the Emperor.
" Had I not been arrested I should not have had the
happiness of seeing your Majesty," rejoined the physician.
A MYSTERY OF THE AUSTRIAN COURT i8i
" I hear much that is satisfactory about your learning,
although in another respect you are said to be a dangerous
man. Why do you trouble yourself with religious affairs ?
Leave them to the clergy," said the Emperor, who continued
to interrogate him at some length on religious subjects. At
last he said, " Now I hear that you devote yourself to medicine.
What have you heard about my condition ? "
" Nothing beyond the supposition that your Majesty has
been poisoned," replied Borri. " But that I may be able to
express my views on the subject your Majesty's physician-
in-ordinary must bring the symptoms before me, and then I
shall be able to speak with certainty," he continued.
A messenger was at once sent for the physician. Mean-
while, Borri noted the Emperor's wasted and grey looks.
Then, rising, he took a survey of the room, examining
every ornament and object and sniffed suspiciously. The
Emperor followed his movements with inquiring eyes.
" Well, Borri," he sighed at length. " What do you think ? "
" I think almost certainly," remarked the physician
decisively, " that your Majesty has been poisoned."
" Holy Mother, have mercy on me ! " cried the Emperor.
" I must, as I said, speak with your physician-in-ordinary,"
continued Borri, "but I can also promise your Majesty's
recovery with equal certainty, for there is still time."
"And how do you come to this conclusion of poison?
My friends dine with me out of the same dish. Do you notice
anything on my body ? "
" Your Majesty, it is not so much your body," replied
Borri, "but the atmosphere of your room that is poisoned."
" How can you tell, when I feel nothing of it ? "
" Your Majesty is too accustomed to the poisonous exhal-
ation to notice it."
" And where does the exhalation come from ? "
Borri rose, and, followed by the wondering eyes of the
Emperor, lifted each candelabrum and placed it on the table,
before the monarch, and so bringing twelve lighted candles
together.
"See the exhalation that rises from the candles," he
exclaimed. " Do you not notice the peculiar colour of the
flame ? "
i82 POISON MYSTERIES
At this moment the chamberlain entered the room.
'* The light is vivid," remarked the Emperor, " but does
not seem to me to be extraordinary."
" Do you not see a fine white mist arising which is not
found in ordinary candles ? " continued Borri.
The Emperor appealed to the chamberlain and asked if
he noticed the mist, and he replied that he did. Just then
the Emperor's physician-in-ordinary entered the cabinet.
" You have come at the right moment," exclaimed the
Emperor. This cavalier asserts that the air of my room is
poisoned. Have you the diagnosis with you ? "
"It is here, your Majesty, where it has been kept since
your illness," replied the physician.
The report was handed to Borri, who quickly glanced at
it and nodded his head.
" Do you perceive the curious smell in the room and the
fine, quickly ascending vapour ? " asked Borri, as he pointed
out the candles to the doctor. '' Look also at the crust which
the vapour has deposited on the ceiling."
" I see it all and bow to your sharpness, cavalier," said
the physician.
"Does your Majesty burn these candles everywhere?"
Borri asked. " It would be interesting to know if they are
used in the Empress's apartments ? "
The chamberlain at once went and brought two lighted
candles from the Empress's chamber, and placed them on the
table near the suspected ones. The former burned clear and
quietly, while the latter burned with a ruddy flame, emitting
a thin vapour while repeated sparks with a crackling noise
flashed from the wick.
"There is the cause of your sickness," exclaimed Borri,
as he laid his hand on the Emperor's candelabra. " Shall I
now prove to your Majesty that these are impregnated with a
subtle poison ? "
" At once," replied the Emperor.
Borri immediately closed the door of the apartment and
extinguished the suspected candles. With the physician's
assistance he then commenced to remove all the wax from
the wick. Meanwhile the chamberlain was summoned and
commanded to bring all the candles he had into the Emperor's
A MYSTERY OF THE AUSTRIAN COURT 183
cabinet. The entire stock, amounting to thirty-five pounds,
was brought from a cupboard in the ante-room where they had
been stored and laid before Borri.
On examining them he called the Emperor's attention to
the peculiar fact that each candle was specially marked with
a gold fillet round the top as if to prevent any mistake.
Further questioning revealed the fact that no other candles
but these had been used in the Emperor's apartments since
Candlemas. Borri next shredded the candle wick and calling
for a small dish of meat carefully mixed the candle wick with
it. A turnspit dog was then sent for, and was shut up in the
cupboard with the dish of meat.
Meanwhile the Emperor was removed to another apartment,
and Borri and the physician proceeded to the palace pharmacy
to prepare an antidote for him. Here Borri tested the sus-
pected candle-wick and found, as he thought, it was impreg-
nated with arsenic. He had left instructions that he was to
be called as soon as the dog got restless, but the animal was
found to be dead by the time he returned to the Emperor's
cabinet.
The antidote prepared by Borri soon produced a beneficial
effect on the Emperor, and his health improved so rapidly that
within three weeks he was able to go out again.
An interesting record of Borri's examination of the poisoned
articles shows his remarkable knowledge of chemistry. Of
the whole of the suspected candles brought to him he kept
back two as evidence and used the remainder in his analysis.
The weight of the candles was twenty-four pounds, and the
impregnated wicks three and a half pounds, from which Borri
concluded that nearly two and three-quarters pounds of
arsenic had been employed.
Immediately Borri reported the result of his investigation
to the Emperor he gave orders that the person who supplied
the candles should be arrested at once.
It was found that they had been supplied by the procurator
of the Jesuits, who was, however, no longer in Vienna and
was not to be found. Being warned in time, this astute
individual had made good his escape.
The solution of the mystery as to how the candles becctme
impregnated with arsenic subsequently transpired. It w.^s..
1 84 POISON MYSTERIES
discovered that the pater-procurator of the Jesuits, accom-
panied by a humble member of the order, had personally
delivered the prepared candles, which were packed in two
boxes, at the palace on March 2, 1670, at dark, with instruc-
tions that they were to be delivered to the chamberlain and
were to be treated with the greatest care.
" Your reverence," said the steward who received them,
" will greatly oblige by telling me what the boxes contain, so
that I may take due care of them, until I hand them over to
the chamberlain on duty ? "
"Learn, my friend," replied the procurator, "that the
boxes contain a number of especially consecrated wax candles
for use in the Imperial apartments. His Majesty, you know,
receives everything he requires through the hands of us who
have blessed it for his service. Inform the servants who have
charge of the Imperial apartments that his Majesty gave
his reverend confessor Father Muller to understand that he
wished, in addition to other consecrated objects, to have such
candles burnt in his rooms. They must be henceforth taken
from this store."
The same evening the candles consecrated by the Jesuit
fathers were lighted in the Imperial cabinet.
For a short time the Emperor appears to have shown some
gratitude to the physician who had been instrumental in
saving his life, and Borri dined at the Imperial table, but the
hatred of the clerical party increased when they saw him
thus favoured.
On June 14, 1670, the Emperor, now quite restored to
health, summoned Borri to his cabinet and thanked him
fervently for his services, but, he added, he was sorry in the
matter of religion Borri had gone astray and that it was
necessary to cure him of his errors. The Pope would appoint
a Commission. " I have obtained a guarantee from the
papal nuncio," continued the Emperor, " that in no case
shall anything be done against your body or your life. So
long as you live, two hundred ducats a year shall be paid to
you by myself or my heirs as a memorial of what you have
done for me."
On the following day Borri left under an escort for Rome.
On his arrival he was arrested and imprisoned in the castle
A MYSTERY OF THE AUSTRIAN COURT 185
of St. Angelo. Owing to the good of&ces of the French
Marechal D'Estrees, whom he attended during a serious
illness, he was allowed a certain amount of liberty and could
go in and out of the castle. He was also allowed to fit up a
small laboratory, where he was able to carry on his work in
chemistry. The Jesuit general Pater Gonzalez is said to have
had several interviews with him while in St. Angelo, with the
object of getting him to reveal the secret of his poison antidote,
but Borri always declined to reveal it, and he eventually died
in the castle of St. Angelo in the year 1695.
Borri has been variously described by his biographers as an
alchemist, physician, quack or charlatan who amassed money
by duping the wealthy patients who consulted him, but,
judging from the works he wrote, he was probably no worse
than many others who practised medicine in his day, and
certainly was before his time in his knowledge of chemistry.
Although a fanatic on religious subjects, he appears to
have had considerably jnore knowledge of disease than
many of his contemporaries, and the stories of his successful
treatment in many cases are probably true. The story
here related of his discovery of the causes of the Emperor
Leopold's mysterious illness is related by Wraxall and
vouched for by Michiel and is believed to be founded on fact.
CHAPTER XVIII
POISON PLOTS
DURING the Middle Ages a strange dread of whole-
sale poisoning spread throughout Europe and caused
numerous panics. Some of these rumours may probably
have been circulated by unscrupulous traders who had articles
to sell, or some business interests to forward, but of this
disturbing fear authentic record still exists that it affected
whole communities.
England was probably freer from crimes of this kind
than almost any other country, but in 1530 a case occurred
which aroused great public indignation. Fisher, Bishop of
Rochester, was accustomed to feed a number of poor people
daily from his table, and one day a large number of his
guests, together with some of the officers of the household,
were taken ill and died. After examination of the food had
been made it was declared that the yeast used in the bread
had been poisoned. Parliament took up the case and the
bishop's cook, one Roose, was found guilty. He was tried
and sentenced to be boiled alive as a terrible example to
others. This seems to have been a penalty for poisoners
during the Middle Ages, a fact which doubtless shows the
great abhorrence in which crimes of this kind were held.
During the case of Sir Thomas Overbury, at which Lord
Bacon performed the duties of Attorney-General, he em-
phasized the enormity of the offence of poisoning, although
he maintained that poisoning was not a crime to which
English people were predisposed. " It is a crime," he stated,
"the more to be dreaded because it is so easily committed
and so hard to be prevented and discovered."
As a result of the Rochester case a law was passed about
1531 making murder by poison high treason, the punishment
186
POISON PLOTS 187
being death by boiling. The wording of the act which recorded
the story of the crime is worth recapitulating at length.
22 Henry VIII, c. 9. The Kynges royall majistie callyng
to hys moste blessed remembraunce that the makyng of good
and holsome laws and due execution of the same agaynste
the offendours thereof is the only cause that good obedyence
and order hath ben preserved in this Realme, and his Highnes
havyng moste tender zeale to the same emonge other thynges
consyderyng that mannes lyfe above all thynges is chyefly
to be favoured, and voluntary murders moste highly to be
detested and abhorred, and specyally of all kyndes of murders,
poysonynge, which in this Realme hytherto our Lord be
thanked hath ben moste rare and seldome comytted or
practysed ; and now in the tyme of this presente parliamente ,
that is to saye, in the xviij daye of February e in the xxijd
yere of his moste victorious reygn, one Richard Roose late
of Rouchester in the Countie of Kente, Coke, otherwyse called
Richard Coke of his moste wyked and damnable dysposicyon
dyd caste a certeyne venym or poyson into a vessel replen-
ysshed with yeste or barme standyng in the Kechyn of the
Reverende Father in God John Bysshopp of Rochester at his
place in Lamehyth Marsshe wythe which yeste or Barme and
other thynges convenyent, porrage or gruell was forthwyth
made for his famylye there beyng wherby not only the nom-
bre of xvij persons of his said famylie which dyd eate of that
porrage were mortally enfeebled and poysoned and one of
them, that is to say, Bennett Curwen gentylman thereof ys
decessed, but also certeyne pore people which resorted to the
sayde Bysshops place and were there charytably fedde wyth
the remayne of the sayde porrage and other vytayles, were in
lyke wise infected, and one pore Woman of them that is to
saye Alyce Tryppytt wydowe is also thereof nowe deceassed :
our sayde sovereign Lorde the Kynge of hys blessed disposi-
cion inwardly abhorrying all such abhomynable offences,
because that in manner no person can lyve in suertye out of
daunger of death by that meane, yf practyse thereof shulde
not be exchued, hath ordeyned and enacted by auctorytie
of thys presente parlyament that the sayd poysonyng be
ajuged and demed as high treason. And that the sayde
Richarde for the sayde murder and poysonynge of the sayde
two persones as is aforesayde by auctoritye of thys presente
parlyament, shall stande and be attaynted of high treason :
and by cause that detestable offence nowe newly practysed
i88 POISON MYSTERIES
and comytted requyreth condigne punysshmente for the
same ; It is ordayned and enacted by auctoritie of this
presente parHamente that the said Richard Roose shal be
therfore boyled to deathe withoute havynge any advauntage
of his clargie."
Under this statute, according to Lord Coke, in his third
institute, Margaret Davy, a young woman, was attainted of
high treason, for poisoning her mistress, and some others
were boiled to death in Smithfield, the 17th of March, the same
year, 1524. But this act, continues his lordship, was too
severe to live long, and was therefore repealed by i Ed. VI, c.
12, and I Mar., c. i. It is thought probable that the proverbial
expressions, to " keep out of hot water " and to " get into hot
water," may have had their origin in the punishment attached
to this crime by the law of 22 Henry VIII.
June 6 is still kept as a public holiday in Malta. Upon
that day, over two hundred years ago, while the island was
still possessed by the Knights of St. John, a Jew waited on the
Grand Master and revealed to him a plot that had been planned
for exterminating the whole population at one stroke. The
man kept a coffee-house frequented by Turkish slaves, and,
understanding their language, the conversation of his customers
had aroused his suspicions. The Grand Master, believing the
truth of the man's statement, took immediate action. The
slaves were at once seized, and, put to torture, they confessed
a design of poisoning all the wells and fountains on the island,
and, to make the result surer, each of the conspirators was to
assassinate a Christian. One hundred and twenty- five were
found guilty ; some were burned, some broken on the wheel,
others were ordered to have their arms and legs attached
to two galleys, which, being rowed apart, thus dismembered
them. Whether these fearful punishments were carried out
it is impossible to say, but the fact remains that the people
of Malta still commemorate their escape from poisoning on
the sixth of June.
Wholesale poisoning appears to have been frequent in
Eastern countries, especially in India and Persia. The wells
or other water sources were usually chosen as the media
for disseminating the poison, and in this way whole villages
have often been destroyed by some miscreant.
POISON PLOTS 189
An extraordinary poison plot was discovered in Lima
towards the close of the eighteenth century. During the
insurrection of 1781 a rich cacique, who professed loyalty,
went into a chemist's shop and asked for two hundred pounds
of corrosive sublimate. He was willing to pay any price for
it. The chemist had nothing like that amount in stock, but,
not wishing to send away so good a customer, substituted
two hundred pounds of alum. On the following day all the
water in the town was found to be impregnated with alum,
and on examination being made, the fence round the reservoir
was found to have been broken down, the banks strewn with
alum and the water rendered undrinkable.
Although the use of poison for taking life was, according
to Bacon, abhorrent to the English character, in some of the
Latin countries the feeling was just the opposite, as evidenced
by the following story : —
The Due de Guise in his memoirs relates, in a most matter-
of-fact way, how he requested the captain of his guard to
poniard a troublesome demagogue at Naples. The captain
was shocked. He would poison anyone at his grace's command
with pleasure, but the dagger was a vulgar instrument. So
the Duke bought some strong poison, the composition of
which he describes at length, and it was duly administered.
But Gennaro, the intended victim, had just eaten cabbage
dressed in oil, which is said to have acted as an antidote, and
so he escaped the effects of the dose.
In the early part of 1917 an extraordinary plot to murder
two of his Majesty's Ministers of State was brought to light,
which suggests some of the subtle methods employed in the
Middle Ages. Three women named Alice Wheeldon, Hetty
Wheeldon and Winnie Mason — mother and daughters — and
a man named Alfred George Mason, husband of the latter,
were charged with conspiring to kiU the then Prime Minister,
Mr. Lloyd George, and Mr. Arthur Henderson, his colleague
on the War Council, by means of strychnine or curare.
The plot was discovered by two secret agents of the Govern-
ment who were employed for the purpose of obtaining informa-
tion of the schemes of persons desirous of evading military
service or otherwise conspiring against the country, and who
had been directed to keep a watch upon this particular family.
190 POISON MYSTERIES
They obtained an introduction to the Wheeldons, who lived
in Derby, by representing themselves as sympathizers and so
won their confidence. They succeeded so well in ingratiating
themselves with the family that not only was the plot revealed
to them but they were entrusted by Mrs. Wheeldon with the
task of actually carrying out the deed.
The suspicions of the two men became aroused when they
found that a letter had been sent to Mason with the object
of procuring some poisons. The woman had previously
shown one of the agents a stuffed skin of a snake shaped
in the form of a bracelet, stating that it was poisonous, and
remarked that she wished she had a hundred of them.
The Wheeldons always showed the greatest animosity to
the Prime Minister and Mr. Henderson, expressing the wish
that they hoped they would soon be dead. Mrs. Wheeldon
also told him that the Suffragettes had spent ;f300 in trying
to poison Lloyd George, the plot being to get into an hotel
where he was staying and drive a nail which had been dipped
in poison through his boot ; this, however, was frustrated by
his going to France. She also declared her intention of
killing another Minister by inserting a poisoned needle into
his skull, and other schemes of an extraordinary character
were discussed.
Before handing over the poison Mrs. Wheeldon was stated
to have said to one of the agents, " You know what you are
doing ! You will rid the world of a bloody murderer and be
a saviour of the country." Asked how the poison was used,
she replied : " It is a crystal, and you drop two drops of
water on it, dip your article in, and when the water evaporates
it leaves the poison." As the men were about to leave, Mrs.
Wheeldon shook hands with them, and said that when she
handed the poison over to them she washed her hands of it,
and would deny on her word of honour that she ever
gave it to them. She assured them that the phial contained
enough to kill five hundred people. Walton Heath had been
selected as being the most likely spot to offer a suitable
opportunity, an air-gun being used as a medium.
The agents at once informed their superior officer, who
had the prisoners arrested and the house searched. Among
the objects found was a small stuffed snake skin which was
POISON PLOTS 191
found to contain four glass phials embedded in cottonwool.
The accused were charged at Derby on Feburary 4, 1917, and
they were tried at the Old Bailey in London on March 7, a
month later.
The accused were described by the Attorney-General as
a very dangerous and desperate type of people, who were
habitually hostile to this country. They were shelterers of
refugees from the army and persons who did their best to
injure Great Britain in the war then proceeding. Mrs,
Wheeldon's son William was himself a conscientious objector.
At the trial a two-ounce tin tobacco box was produced
containing four phials sealed. Instructions were enclosed
which had been copied by both the agents and were as
follows : —
" Powder in tube ' A ' is sufficient for two or even three
doses to be given by the mouth or in solution.
" Powder ' C ' to be injected either in solution or by a
dart, which will penetrate into the body and stop for a while.
Rusted in solution or fired from an air-gun, or a rusty needle
if driven well in with powder will do, but don't advise unless
in urgent dilemma.
"Solution ' B ' — either by mouth or injection.
" Solution * D '—injection only.
"All are certain.
" All four will probably leave a trace, but if the bloke
wanted dies suspect, it will be a job to prove it so long as you
have a chance to get at the dog, dead in twenty seconds.
Powder ' A ' on meal or bread is O.K. If you care for
microbe can supply needle thirty-six hours in strong solution
and allow to dry in air, dip again for ten seconds and allow
again to dry. Cover with ' C ' powder."
Upon analysis the phials were found to contain : —
"A," 7| grammes strychnine hydrochloride in crystals.
" B," I J drachms strychnine hydrochloride in solution.
" C," curare in powder.
" D," I drachm of curare in solution.
The box containing the poison was sent to Mrs. Wheeldon
by her son-in-law, Alfred Mason, who was a lecturer on
pharmacy at Southampton University College and who was
said to have made a special study of curare. Only a few
192 POISON MYSTERIES
weeks before the preceding Christmas he had showed a student
in the college a specimen of it, and described its properties.
The tobacco box containing the phials and instructions are
said to have been despatched by him from Southampton to
Derby at the request of Mrs. Wheeldon.
Mrs. Wheeldon volunteered to give evidence, in which
she acknowledged she had been active in helping men to
escape from their military duties ever since conscription had
been introduced. There was no form of help that she could
give them that she had withheld. Her own son was a
conscientious objector. She was quite prepared in the cir-
cumstances to violate what she knew to be the law and had
no regard to consequences. She expressed her bitter hatred
of Mr. Lloyd George and was ready to do him a mischief.
At the examination of Alfred Mason, he said he had devoted
some time to the study of criminology in relation to poison,
but he did not know that strychnine was used for poisoning.
If poison was to have been used for a human being he would
have definitely stated in his instructions that it should be
mixed with food. He said he had had experience in destroy-
ing two thousand dogs, and that when his mother-in-law
had written she had said she wanted some poison for a dog,
and that it was a dangerous dog, and the impression left on
his mind was that it was difficult to get it. He treated the
allusion to the microbe as a joke.
Counsel on behalf of the prisoners denied the charges as a
vindictive prosecution of the worst of its kind that had ever
taken place in England. He submitted the curious suggestion
that the proper trial of this case would be by ordeal, on which
the judge remarked, " I am afraid that it has been abolished."
Counsel said he submitted it to the jury. The judge asked
him if he proposed that the prisoners should walk over hot
ploughshares or something of that kind, to which counsel
replied : " I do, -in order to prove their innocence." He
threw ridicule on the idea that Mr. Lloyd George could have
been killed by poisoned darts or arrows.
Mr. Justice Low, in summing up, said that of all forms of
murder, poisoning was the most dastardly and the most
dangerous, and conspiracy to murder by poisoning was the
worst of all. It was almost incredible that these prisoners
POISON PLOTS 193
had by their own admission behaved as these people had done.
The jury having found the prisoners guilty, the elder woman,
Mrs. Wheeldon, was sentenced to ten years' penal servitude,
the man Mason to seven years and his wife to five years ; the
girl Harriet Wheeldon was found not guilty and discharged.
In December, 1909, a sensation was caused throughout
Austria owing to the arrest of a young officer named Lieutenant
Hofrichter of Linz, who was charged with being concerned in
a plot to poison a captain of the Imperial General Staff and
other highly-placed Imperial officers by sending them poisoned
samples of a new patent medicine.
The alleged motive was said to be a desire to clear a path
for promotion by the removal of officers of higher rank.
Suspicion was first directed towards him by the statement
of a brother officer at Linz where he was stationed, who
mentioned that he had received from the lieutenant a box
exactly similar to those in which the fatal powder had been sent.
About a week before this, a Captain Mader, together with
several officers of the General Staff, had received by post
a sample of a supposed patent medicine, and on taking some
of it he died shortly afterwards. It was found that the
medicine contained a large proportion of potassium cyanide.
On suspicion falling on Hofrichter, his quarters were
searched and a copying apparatus which apparently had
been used for the circulars accompanying the poisoned
medicine was found, and he was^also identified as the pur-
chaser of capsules, boxes and envelopes similar to those which
had been sent to the officers. Hofrichter was brought to
Vienna for trial by the military tribunal, from which the
public were excluded.
The first hearing of the case lasted seven hours, and in the
course of the investigation it was stated that four officers had
fallen victims to the effects of poison, the first being Captain
Mader. In consequence of the order of the military court,
the dwellings of eighty officers were searched in Vienna and
the provinces and a series of extraordinary tragedies followed.
One of the officers who was engaged at the War Office,
felt the indignity to such an extent that he shot himself
immediately afterwards. Another victim was a brother-in-
law of the accused, who after devoting himself to collecting
194 POISON MYSTERIES
evidence and examining possible witnesses, hoping to prove
the innocence of Hofrichter, died suddenly, the cause being
said to have been hastened by his anxiety and excitement
over the case. A Lieutenant Schmidt, who had been summoned
to the military court in Vienna, also committed suicide.
The tribunal then proceeded to inquire into Hofrichter 's
previous career, which brought to light the fact that, some years
before, he was engaged to be married to the daughter of a
pastor in Bohemia, but the engagement was broken off after
he entered the Vienna Military Academy. The girl, in despair,
is st9.ted to have poisoned herself with potassium cyanide,
and a letter from Hofrichter which arrived after her death
was buried unopened with her.
It was rumoured that Hofrichter had sent the girl the
poison. The tribunal decided to have the body exhumed.
This was carried out, and the unopened letter that had been
sent five years previously was discovered. The remains of
her body were subjected to analysis, but no trace of poison
was discovered.
Meanwhile, the case was postponed for further investigation.
This finally revealed the fact that Hofrichter had been leading
a double life for a considerable time, and had done so with
extraordinary cunning. In the army he had been generally
liked and esteemed as a hard worker and a good officer,
while under the name of Dr. Haller he carried on a criminal
career. ^
Letters to his wife which were intercepted from the prison,
revealed that he intended to commit suicide, and in one of
these he asked her to conceal various poisons including
atropine and hyoscyamine in a bunch of flowers, which he had
asked for to lay on an altar in his cell. At his house in Linz
a considerable quantity of poisons and drugs were discovered.
The long delays between the meetings of the military
tribunal were very trying to the accused man. For months
he had faced the ordeal of a severe cross-examination. He
feigned insanity with great ability, and the methods of the
police inclined the public in his favour. At length, after a
trial lasting for four months, his defence broke down, and he
confessed. He was found guilty and sentenced to death by
hanging.
POISON PLOTS 195
During the year 1921 several attempts were made on the
hves of well-known people, which appear to have had an
influence on weak-minded persons or those on the border
line of insanity. Such cases are not infrequent in the history
of criminal poisoning, where attempts have been made to
take life without any apparent motive.
Early that year it was reported that the Vice-Chancellor
of Oxford had received a box of chocolate creams by post,
and being suspicious at the receipt of such an anonymous gift
he submitted them to one of his colleagues, a professor of
science. This gave rise to the rumours that they contained
something of a deleterious nature, such as powdered glass,
but the result of an analysis showed that the sweets were
innocuous. An undergraduate was reported to have con-
fessed, and the presumed plot against the Vice-Chancellor
was declared to be a hoax.
In November, 1922, a sensation was caused in London by
an attempt to poison the Chief Commissioner of the Metro-
politan Police at Scotland Yard. On November 9 it was
reported in the newspapers that the Chief Commissioner
had been seized with an apparent heart attack in his office
at Scotland Yard, which came on while he was dressing
before proceeding to the Lord Mayor's banquet. It was
not till nine o'clock that night that the doctors summoned to
attend him knew definitely that it was a case of poisoning
by arsenic.
It appeared that on November 3, six days previously, a pack-
age addressed to the Assistant Commissioner, New Scotland
Yard, Westminster, had been delivered by parcel post. On
being opened it was found to contain four chocolate eclairs,
wrapped in grease-proof paper. Enclosed with the eclairs
was a small white card three inches long by one and a half
wide, bearing upon it the following : "A good lunch and a
hearty appetite. — Molly." The box had been posted in the
Balham district. The eclairs were sent to an analyst for
further investigation, but before the result had been received
a second parcel arrived on November 9, addressed to Brigadier-
General Horwood, New Scotland Yard, Westminster, S.W.,
and was opened by the Chief Commissioner himself. The
box is described as being of cardboard, 7 J by if inches, and
196 POISON MYSTERIES
was wrapped in a piece of stiff white paper addressed in block
letters and contained whipped cream walnuts. ^ The box was
tied with string and was also posted in the Balham district
about 4 p.m., November 8.
The morning that the box arrived Sir William had received
a letter from a relative who said that she was sending him
a box of chocolates for his birthday, and he accordingly-
opened the box unsuspectingly. He took one of the chocolates
and offered them to his secretary who was in the room.
She, however, only bit off a small piece of the outer covering
of hers, and remarking that it tasted bitter, threw it away
and told the Commissioner. He, still believing the package
to have come from his friend, suspected nothing, and though
he^ noticed it burned his throat a little, ate more later in
the day. While dressing for dinner that evening the Com-
missioner was seized with severe pain and showed symptoms
of having swallowed an irritant poison, and was removed to
St. Thomas's Hospital next day.
On the chocolates being carefully examined it was found that
there was a small square mark at the bottom of each as if a
portion of the chocolate coating had been removed, a poison
mixed with the cream inside and the square of chocolate
afterwards replaced. On investigation it was found that
the poison employed was undoubtedly arsenic, which was
plainly to be seen and took the form of dark greenish-tinted
matter.
. On November 10 another box was received at Scotland
Yard. This was a small cardboard box 2 J by if inches
by I of an inch, greyish tint with plain card pasted on lid,
wrapped in light brown tissue paper, addressed in block
letters to The Commissioner of the Police, New Scotland
Yard, Westminster. The box contained two small tablets of
Bournville chocolate wrapped in white paper. The box was
sealed with black sealing-wax, and was posted in the Balham
district about 3 p.m., on November 9.
The Chief Commissioner, though for some days in a very
critical condition, ended in making a complete recovery.
Only a few weeks afterwards a small cardboard box was
received at the Home Office addressed to " The Secretary
for Home Affairs. Whitehall. S.W." It was taken to the
POISON PLOTS 197
registry and opened, and was found to contain cream fondants.
The parcel was obviously sent by the same person who sent
the poisoned chocolates to the Commissioner of Police. The
sweets had apparently been tampered with and were sent
for analysis, but no arsenic was found in them. The writing
on the address was the same in each case and the box had
been posted in the same district of Balham.
Previously to this the police authorities had issued a
warning to well-known people, putting them on their guard
against similar attempts.
Early in February, 1923, a man living at Balham was arrested
by the police at his residence, and was charged with attempting
to murder the Chief Commissioner and the two Assistant
Commissioners of Police. He made the following statement :
" I sent the Commissioner chocolates. I sent them for
analytical purposes. I have had no real rest since then ; I
would not harm him for anything."
In the house where he lived a quantity of weed-killer
was found coloured in similar manner to that found in the
chocolates.
The analyst to the Home Office, who examined the
chocolate eclairs sent to the Commissioner, found that they
each contained arsenic, the amount estimated in one being
3 J grains. The three whipped cream walnut chocolates
which were addressed to the Assistant Commissioners also
contained a considerable quantity of arsenic, the amount in
one of them which was tested being six grains.
He also examined two Bournville chocolates which had been
drilled with holes and filled with arsenic. The quantity of
arsenic in one of these was i of a grain. In two Dairy Milk
chocolates he examined, similar holes had been drilled, which
had been filled up with the same kind of arsenic as that used
in the weed-killer and was in the form of a blue powder which
was strongly alkaline.
The prisoner was committed for trial, was found to be insane,
and ordered to be detained during the King's pleasure.
CHAPTER XIX
CURIOUS METHODS EMPLOYED BY SECRET
POISONERS
OF the various methods employed by criminal poisoners,
administration through the medium of food or drink
has been more common than any other. The poisoned cake
or wine recurs with monotonous frequency in the history of
poisoning from the earliest times down to the present. Women
especially seem to have had a predilection for this method of
administering a lethal dose, a fact probably due to their
control and direction of domestic matters, which renders the
introduction of a poisonous substance into the food or drink
an easy matter.
In early times some fell victims to their own evil designs,
as instanced in the case of Rosamond, the wife of Alboin,
King of Lombardy, in a.d. 573. It is stated that, wishing
to rid herself of her husband, she gave him a cup of poisoned
wine when he was coming from his bath. The king drank
part, but suspecting its nature from the strange effect it
produced, wisely insisted that she should drink the remainder,
with the result that both died shortly afterwards.
Reginald Scot, who wrote The Discovery of Witchcraft
in 1584, quaintly states his belief that " women were the first
inventors and the greatest practisers of poysoning and more
materially addicted and given thereunto than men."
Throughout the history of criminal poisoning there has
always been a high percentage of women implicated and
numerous cases could be cited of female lunatics with whom
the use of poison for criminal purposes amounted to an obses-
sion. With these types, not infrequently met with, there is
no suggestion of a motive, the object being apparently to
destroy life without any sane reason.
Women of this kind have lived in various periods from
198
METHODS OF SECRET POISONERS 199
the time of Locusta to de Brinvilliers. There was also Van
der Linden, a Dutch woman who poisoned one hundred and
two people, and Helene Jegado, who apparently regarded
poisoning as a pastime and whose victims were estimated to
number twenty-six.
Some poisoners, not content with introducing the substance
into wine or other drink, essayed to improve on this method
by preparing a goblet or cup in such a way that it would
impregnate any liquid that was placed in it. There is record
of one Fran9ois Belot, a Frenchman, who made a speciality
of this method, and, it is said, derived a considerable income
therefrom ; but he fitly ended his days by being broken on
the wheel on June lo, 1679.
According to a contemporary writer, Belot's special method
consisted in cramming a toad with arsenic, placing it in a silver
goblet, and after pricking its head, crushing it in the vessel.
Whilst this operation was being performed he recited certain
charms. According to his own account, which is still on record,
of treating a cup with a toad in this way, " I know a secret,"
he says, " such that, in doctoring a cup with a toad, and what
I put into it, if fifty persons chanced to drink from it afterwards,
even if it were washed and rinsed, they would all be done for,
and the cup could only be purified by throwing it into a hot
fire. After having thus poisoned the cup, I should not try it
upon a human being, but upon a dog, and I should entrust
the cup to nobody." Belot's statements were evidently
believed in his time, and he enjoyed a considerable reputation.
Another individual named Blessis flourished about the
same period, and who, claiming to practise sorcery and magic,
went so far as to declare to the world that he had discovered
a method of manipulating mirrors in such a way that whoever
looked into them would meet his death.
According to tradition, boots, gloves and other articles of
wearing apparel have been utilized by poisoners for carrying
out their evil plans, and although many of these tales
are purely legendary, it is quite possible that others have
some substratum of truth. Tissot states that John, King
of Castille, owed his death to wearing a pair of boots
which were supposed to have been impregnated with poison
by a Turk. Henry VI is said to have succumbed through
200 POISON MYSTERIES
wearing poisoned gloves, and Louis XIV and Pope Clement
VII through the fumes of a poisoned candle.
The stories of the poisoned shirts which, if contemporar}'
records are to be believed, were not infrequently employed
by poisoners in the seventeenth century, are within the
bounds of possibility. Apparently corrosive sublimate,
arsenic and cantharides were employed for this purpose. The
shirt is said to have been prepared by soaking it in a strong
solution of one of these poisons, the idea being to produce a
violent dermatitis with ulceration, which would force the victim
to take to his bed. The physician would then be sent for,
and would probably diagnose the case as due to syphilis,
and prescribe mercury, with the effect of killing the patient
in the end.
Such a case is recorded by Dr. Lucian Nass, who relates the
story of Madame de Poulaillon, the wife of a wealthy man
who was a good deal her senior. Desirous of ridding herself
of her husband, she sought the counsel of one Marie Bosse, who
told Madame that she should try the method of the poisoned
shirt, which she herself would prepare. She then took one of
her husband's shirts, together with a piece of arsenic " as big as
an egg," to La Bosse. She first washed it and then soaked
the tail in a strong solution of arsenic, so that it only looked
" a little rusty," as if it had been ill- washed, and was stiff er
than usual. La Bosse told her that only the lower part of
the shirt had been thus prepared, and the effect would be to
produce violent inflammation and intense pain.
Madame de Poulaillon is said to have given La Bosse a
sum of money, equal tO;f8oo at the present day, for her services.
The husband was, however, warned of the evil intended to
him and had his wife arrested. The lady is said to have
so fascinated her judges that a contemporary writer states
" they were touched by her wit and by her grace and by the
tones in which she spoke of her misfortunes and her crime,
and though she confessed her guilt, and pronounced herself
worthy of death, she was acquitted with applause."
A few years ago. Dr. Nass, with a view to ascertaining the
truth of the assertions connected with the poisoned shirt,
made some interesting experiments on a guinea-pig. He
carefully shaved a portion of the left lumbar region and
METHODS OF SECRET POISONERS 201
gently rubbed the skin with a paste containing arsenic in the
proportion of one in ten. He repeated the operation several
times during the day. Shortly afterwards the animal became
prostrate, the eyes became dull, it assumed a cholera-like
aspect and in forty-eight hours died. The skin on which the
paste had been applied remained unchanged and unbroken,
and showed no sign of ulceration. On examining the internal
organs after death, fatty degeneration of the viscera was found
and several marked symptoms of arsenical poisoning. This
experiment does not, of course, prove the fact that a shirt
impregnated with arsenic worn in direct contact with the
skin would prove fatal, but it shows that arsenic may be intro-
duced into the body simply by gentle friction on an unbroken
skin, and that the effect of the poisoned shirt was possible.
The Duke of Savoy is said to have been one of the last
victims of this method, and it is stated that when a shirt
could not be procured a slipper was used, although it did not
prove so effective. Apparently the primary object in this
method was not to kill but to prostrate the patient in
bed where he could be despatched at leisure under pretence of
. treatment.
■ Similar to the method of treating the shirt there is a
legendary story in India of the Queen of Ganore, who is said
to have killed Rajah Bukht by impregnating his marriage
robes with poison. Che vers, who relates the story, ^ affirms
that this form of poisoning is possible. " Anyone," he writes,
" who has noticed how freely a robust person in India perspires
through a thin garment, can understand that if the cloth
were thoroughly impregnated with the cantharadine of that
very powerful vesicant, the Telini, the result would be as
dangerous as that of an extensive burn." He further states
that Mr. Todd has published ample evidence in support of
the idea that the deaths of several historical personages in
India were caused by poisoned robes.
A curious case in which the poisoner attempted to prove that
the medical treatment was responsible for the crime happened
in France a few years ago, when a woman was charged at the
Paris Court of Assizes with attempting to murder her husband.
1 Manual of Medical Jurisprudence in India. Norman Chevers.
202 POISON MYSTERIES
It was known that the couple had Hved unhappily together,
and arrangements had been made for a divorce.
One morning the husband complained of a severe headache
and his wife suggested a dose of antipyrine, which she gave
him in some mineral water. He remarked to her at the time
that the draught had a peculiar taste. Later in the day
she administered sundry cups of coffee to him, but he grew
rapidly worse and at night a doctor was summoned. He
failed to diagnose the complaint, and called in other medical
men, who were equally puzzled. One thing which they all
noticed, was a peculiar dilatation of the pupils of the
patient's eyes.
A consultation was held the next day, and shortly after-
wards one of the medical men received a note from the lady
in which she stated that her husband was " black." "He
was dead, more dead than any man I ever saw."
The doctor at once went to see the patient, and found
him in a state of collapse. He bled him twice and injected
caffeine, but he still remained motionless. After a time it
occurred to the doctor that the patient's symptoms resembled
those of atropine poisoning, and, resorting to other measures,
he eventually brought him round. Then he remembered
that the lady had previously asked him for some morphine
for herself, and when he had refused it she requested some
atropine for her dog's eyes. He wrote her a prescription for
a solution of atropine, containing ten per cent, of the drug,
and took it to the chemist himself. On further inquiries it
was proved that the lady had procured atropine upon various
other occasions by cop3dng the doctor's prescription and forging
his signature.
At the trial the medical evidence was very conflicting,
but the consensus of opinion was in favour of the theory
that atropine had been administered in small, repeated doses.
The accused woman declared in her defence that atropine
had been put into the medicine for her husband in mistake
by the chemist who had dispensed it. There was no evidence
to support this theory, and she was found guilty and sentenced
to five years' penal servitude.
A modern instance of the poisoned boot came to light
a few years ago in a case of death by the absorption
METHODS OF SECRET POISONERS 203
of a poisonous boot-blacking. The victim, a young man,
had been to a dance, and shortly afterwards became uncon-
scious and died in four hours. For some time the cause of his
death was a complete mystery, when a few days later a bottle
of blacking was found in his room, with which it was discovered
he had blacked his shoes on the evening of his death. The
colouring had penetrated his socks and stained his feet and
ankles. On analysis the solvent in the blacking was found
to consist of nitro-benzene, an extremely poisonous liquid,
largely used in the manufacture of the cheap, strong-smelling
perfumes and soaps so frequently used. This was no doubt
rapidly absorbed by his feet when dancing, and so caused
his death.
A great deal of fiction has been written concerning the
so-called poison rings of the sixteenth and seventeenth
century, which are generally taken to mean a finger ring
containing a secret receptacle for carrying some poisonous
substance. In the majority of cases it has been found that
these receptacles were originally intended for hair kept as
a " memento mori " or for fragments of religious relics.
Rings have been described as being fitted with a tiny
envenomed spike by means of which the wearer could inocu-
late his victim by a grasp of the hand, as described in the
following story published a few years ago in a Paris journal.
It stated that when examining an ancient ring he had
picked up in the shop of an antiquity dealer in the Rue St.
Honore, a customer scratched his hand with the sharp part
of it. While still talking to the dealer, in a few moments
he suddenly felt an indescribable feeling, as if his whole body
were paralysed to the finger-tips, and he became so ill that
it was found necessary to send for a medical man. The
doctor diagnosed it as a case of poisoning and after the prompt
administration of an emetic the patient recovered. The
medical man is then said to have examined the ring and
found attached to it inside, two lions' claws made of sharp
steel, with grooves in them which contained the poison.
Having long resided in Venice, he recognized it as being what
was formerly called the " annelo della morte," or " death
ring," often used by Italians in the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries.
204 POISON MYSTERIES
Outside the realm of romance, however, there is little doubt
that rings were used in ancient times as a medium for carrying
poisons. This was originally done for the purpose of self-
destruction, or at a later period rriay have been found useful
as a lethal weapon against an enemy. There are several
specimens of these rings with traditions attached to them which
6ear the evidence of authenticity.
In the troublous times of the Roman Emperors, when those
who took a prominent part in public affairs were liable to be
suddenly thrown into prison at the word of a capricious
monarch, rings containing receptacles for poison are said to
have been often worn, so that the contents could be swallowed
to save their wearer from torture, imprisonment or an ignomin-
ious death.
Rings of the Roman period are always wrought with the
hammer, and never cast ; they were thus hollow and would
easily afford a convenient receptacle for poison. Pliny
records that when Marcus Crassus robbed the Capitol of the
gold deposited there by Camillus, the custodian who was
responsible for its safety " broke the stone of his ring " and
died shortly afterwards.
An interesting Roman gem which might have been used
for this purpose is in a London museum. It is an onyx,
upon which is engraved the head of a horned fawn. The
stone itself has been hollowed out, forming a cavity sufficiently
large to carry poison, to take which it would only be necessary
to bite through the thin shell of the onyx and swallow the
contents of the cavity.
Further mention of these hoUowed gems is made with
reference to Heliogabalus, to whom it was foretold that he
should die a violent death. It is said " he therefore prepared
against such an emergency, halters twined with silk, and poison
enclosed in rubies, sapphires and emeralds set in his rings
to give him a choice ^pf deaths." It is said of Demosthenes
that having given up all hope of escaping from his enemies
the Macedonians, he swallowed a poison which he carried about
with him concealed in a stylus.
Hannibal also is said to have taken his life in a similar
manner, and when hunted and in dread of being delivered
into the hands of the Romans by Prusias, King of Bithynia,
METHODS OF SECRET POISONERS 205
took the poison which he always carried with him concealed
in the hollow of a ring. Juvenal thus alludes to it in his
Tenth Satire :
" Nor swords, nor spears, nor stones from engines hurl'd.
Shall quell the man whose frown alarm 'd the world ;
The vengeance due to Cannae's fatal field.
And floods of human gore — a ring shall yield."
Although these stories describe what happened so long
ago, it is curious to note how history repeats itself, when we
recall the tragic conclusion to the trial of Whittaker Wright
in London a few years ago. Immediately, when found guilty
of the charges brought against him, either as he was listening
to the judge's closing words or as he was leaving the scene of
the trial, he swallowed, unobserved, some tablets of potassium
cyanide which he had secreted about him, and died shortly
afterwards within the precincts of the court.
Another instance of a similar refuge from persecuting fate
is that of Condorcet, who was secretary to the Academy of
Sciences of France, and who was proscribed by the Convention
at the time of the Revolution in 1792. He took refuge in
the house of a Madame Vernet in Paris, but fearing to com-
promise his protectress by a longer stay, he left his asylum
with the intention of taking refuge in the country house of
an old friend. Unfortunately, the friend was away and he
wandered about sleeping at night in some stone quarries,
but was at length arrested and taken to Bourg-la-Reine and
lodged in prison. On the following morning, March 28, 1794,
he was found dead in his cell, having swallowed some poison
which he carried about in readiness for an emergency, concealed
in his ring. On investigation, the poison was found to con-
sist of opium and stramonium which he kept specially pre-
pared.
Motley records that in the conspiracies against the life of
the Prince of Orange about the year 1582, under the influence
of the Court of Spain, the young' Lamoral Egmont, in return
for the kindness shown to him by the Prince, attempted to
destroy him at his own table by means of poison which he
kept concealed in a ring. Philippe van Marnix, Lord of Saint
Aldegonde, was to have oeen treated in the same way, and
2o6 POISON MYSTERIES
a hollow ring containing poison was said to have been found
in Egmont's lodgings.
There are, however, rings of the sixteenth and seventeenth
century of Italian workmanship that have traditions from
which there is little doubt they were actually used for the
purpose of carrying poisons. In examining rings, claimed to
have been used for the purpose, it is necessary to note first that
the poison must be accessible, and second, that the receptacle
must be so constructed that it could be used without the ring
being taken from the finger. Rings are often found with cavi-
ties and receptacles on the inside of the bezel, and it is difficult
to believe that they could have been used for this purpose.
There are many ancient rings extant, often called poison
rings, with small boxes placed at the back of a stone, but these
rings could only have been used for containing a perfume or
a small relic. The construction of a ring, claimed to have
been used for the purpose, must show reasonable grounds
that it could have been so employed. The most interesting
ring of the kind known, is one that was formerly in the
possession of the late Bishop of Ely. It passed from him to
a clergyman in London, who was a well-known antiquary. He
claimed that it once belonged to Caesar Borgia, and from the
workmanship there seems to be little doubt it belonged to the
period. Made of gold, slightly enamelled, it bears the date
of 1503, and round the inside are inscribed the words : —
" FAYS CEQUE DOYS AVIEN QUE POURRA." The bezel forms
a hollow receptacle and on the front is engraved the name
" Borgia," and in letters reversed are the words " cor unum
UNA VIA." At the side of the bezel is a secret slide, which
on being pushed reveals the cavity for holding the poison.
Another gold ring of the late sixteenth century, in the
possession of an Italian nobleman, is said to have originally
belonged to a member of the family, who was a prince of the
Church. The bezel is elaborately wrought, and richly orna-
mented with dark blue enamel, picked out with red and white.
It is apparently made in one piece, but a small portion in the
centre has cunningly been made to open on a hinge, revealing
a secret receptacle capable of holding quite a sufficient quantity
of arsenic or corrosive sublimate to cause the death of two
or three people.
METHODS OF SECRET POISONERS 207
Fairholt describes a jewelled ring of curious construction
set with two rubies and a pyramidal diamond. The gold
setting was richly engraved, and the collet securing the
diamond opened with a spring, disclosing a somewhat large
receptacle for " such virulent poisons as were concocted by
Italian chemists in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries."
One of the most curious rings of this kind was formerly
in the possession of an Italian cardinal. It is beautifully
wrought in fine gold and dates from the latter part of the
sixteenth century. The shanks are partly enamelled in black
and the bezel is rectangular ; at the side of it is a very minute
knob with a groove which could be easily turned with the
finger nail without removing the ring from the finger. On
turning the knob a cylindrical receptacle is revealed, which
was most likely used for carrying some poisonous substance.
There is a story told in connection with this ring that the
secret receptacle was kept filled with tiny granules prepared
from a deadly fungus, specially prepared for the owner. The
secret receptacle of this ring is almost unnoticeable even when
it has been opened.
In connection with the stories relating to a poisoned
pin-prick, the following account which appeared in a Lon-
don morning daily some time ago, is not without interest.
The writer says : "The police are searching for a man who
is alleged to have poisoned a girl in London under extra-
ordinary circumstances. The girl, who was a typist em-
ployed in a Fleet Street ofhce, said that she was walking
to her office when a well-dressed man overtook her and
grasped her by the wrist. Directly she reached her office
she was overcome by four fainting fits in succession. When
she recovered she showed a small punctured wound in her
wrist and the police were informed." Then follows a lengthy
description of the wanted man. " In various parts of America,"
adds, the writer, " similar reports of devices employed by
persons connected with the White Slave Traffic have been
made known. When the victim faints in the street, the
assailant who then passes as a relative or friend, calls a cab
and drives off with the girl, the poison having been injected
into the wrist by pressure from a poison ring! "
Probably one of the most curious receptacles ever used for
2o8 POISON MYSTERIES
carrying poison was a wooden leg. Some years ago a man
named Jasper Reed, who was once a member of a gang of
international thieves, lost .his leg through amputation
while he was in prison for a theft of £480 from a bank in
Antwerp. After his release he was lost sight of for a long
time, until one day a wooden-legged cripple was arrested in
the street in Antwerp in connection with the theft of some
bank-notes, and afterwards poisoned himself while in prison.
A post-mortem examination of the body showed that he had
killed himself with potassium cyanide, and a bottle containing
the poison was found concealed in a hollow receptacle in the
wooden leg he was wearing.
There is a tradition that Pope Clement VII, one of the
Medici, was poisoned in 1534 by the fumes of a torch im-
pregnated with arsenic carried before him in a religious
procession. This is quite within the realm of possibility,
especially if the torch or candle had been so prepared that it
would give off a certain amount of arseniuretted hydrogen
while being burnt in a confined space.
The poisoned flowers of mediaeval romance, although they
have been discredited in the light of modern science, must
not be dismissed as entirely improbable, as evidenced from the
following curious case which occurred in London a few years
ago. A hawker with a barrow filled with bunches of lavender,
was noticed talking wildly in a street in Stockwell. In a few
minutes he was seen to fall insensible and was removed to
Lambeth Infirmary, where he died shortly afterwards. The
medical officer of the institution said he found the man was
suffering from nitro-benzene poisoning, and in his pockets
were discovered seventeen packets of lavender seeds and a
bottle of oil of mirbane (nitro-benzene) which he had evidently
used to increase the perfume of the lavender he sold. The
doctor stated that in his opinion, the man had been overcome
by the vapour of the nitro-benzene he had inhaled from the
lavender on his barrow
Probably the most deadly poison known to science to-day
exists in the form of an innocent-looking white powder, which
is highly dangerous even to handle. It emits a slight vapour
even when exposed to the air, which if inhaled would cause
instant death. It has been estimated that if three grains
METHODS OF SECRET POISONERS 209
were diffused in a roomful of people it would kill every one
present. It is hardly necessary to state that poisons of such
great virulence as those revealed by modern chemical research,
were unknown to the chemists of the Middle Ages, and it
is equally certain that the latter knew of few poisonous bodies
that are not familiar to chemists of the present day.
In the military poison plot investigated in Austria in 1909,
and referred to in detail elsewhere, the gaol authorities were at a
loss to account for the prisoner's constant demand for flowers
for pious purposes while he was on remand. It was only dis-
covered by intercepted letters that he wanted them in order
to smuggle poison into his cell, which he apparently succeeded
in doing. He requested his wife to insert the poison in flowers
which he asked for so he could place them on the altar
which he had erected in his cell. The letter to his wife in
which this was discovered reads : " I should like to commit
suicide, but will not, as I must work for you and for the
children. You can save me. Get me flowers and have some
atropine or hyoscyamine. Victor or will obtain it for
you, in liquid and solid. Put it carefully in a small quill
and seal it up with wax. Put this quill in a carnation, the
calyx will hold it well, then tie the calyx round with a thread
as they do in florists' shops." It appears that some poison
actually reached him in this ingenious manner.
A curious case in which a poisoned bed played an im-
portant part came to light in America a few years ago, when
a woman named Mary Kelliher was tried at Boston on
charges of poisoning her husband, three children, a sister and
sister-in-law. These people mysteriously died during a
period of three years ; but after the death of her daughter,
in July 1908, suspicion was aroused, and a post-mortem was
held which disclosed the presence of arsenic in the body.
The bodies of the other five persons were then exhumed, in
all of which arsenic was found. There was, however, no
evidence connecting the woman with the administration of
poison to her victim until it occurred to the District Attorney
to examine some of the furniture in the bedroom. The
mattress on which all of those of the family who had died had
lain was then cut open and carefully examined. In the hair
stuffing considerable quantities of arsenic were discovered,
o
210 POISON MYSTERIES
which suggested it had been specially impregnated, so the
poison could be inhaled during sleep by the person lying on
the bed. Ingenious as this suggestion for the prosecution was,
as to how the poison came into the bodies of those who had
died, Mrs. Kelliher was acquitted after being fifteen months
in prison on this charge.
CHAPTER XX
LOVE-PHILTRES AND POISONS
THE employment of certain substances in the form of
charms or potions to incite the amatory passion has
been practised from a time of great antiquity. The idea
involved in the use of love-philtres, as they were termed at a
later period, was no doubt based to a certain extent on physio-
logical principles and was probably first suggested by observ-
ation of the habits of the lower animals. The early Hebrews
are said to have employed the fruit of the mandrake, which
were known by the suggestive name of " love-apples," for this
purpose.
The popularity of the philtra or pocula amatoria among the
ancient Greeks and Romans at a later period can readily be
understood in an age given to sensuality in its grossest forms.
Medea was regarded as the greatest adept in the art of pre-
paring philtres, and hence the term " Medei de herbae," used
by Horace and Ovid to designate the substances generally
used. Next in reputation came the Thessalian women, who
were supposed to have acquired the art from Medea, and who
were said to be versed in all the secrets relating to poison and
sorcery.
Lucretius, the great philosophical poet of the Ciceronian era,
is said to have written his poem entitled " On the Nature of
Things " in the intervals of delirium occasioned by a philtre
which had been secretly administered to him by his wife or his
mistress, Lucilia, and it is stated that Lucullus, the Roman
general, died in a state of delirium from a similar cause.
Thus the effects of these potions were evidently often more
serious than was contemplated by those who used them.
Ovid, the exponent of the amatory art, judging from some
of his lines, was evidently no believer in this method of
211
212 POISON MYSTERIES
procuring affection so much practised by his contemporaries.
He writes —
" Who so doth run to Haemon arts
I dub him for a dolt,
And giveth that which he doth pluck
From forehead of a colt.
Medea's herbs will not procure
That love shall lasting give,
No slibbersawces given to maids
To make them pale and wan
Will help ; such slibbersawces mar the minds of maid and
man,
And have in them a furious force of phrensie now and then."
Cornelius Nepos, Plutarch and other early writers also
state that the love-philtre was often indeed but a poison cup,
and the death of the Emperor Lucius is quoted as having been
due to a draught of this description given to him at the instance
of Calisthenes.
That the effects of these philtres were often dangerous and
sometimes fatal is hardly to be wondered at, when we consider
the extraordinary nature of some of the substances used in
their composition in ancient times. They were generally
compounded with much mystery by the old or wise women,
who had a reputation for sorcery, and they observed the
greatest secrecy as to their composition.
According to the most authentic writers these ingredients
were both grotesque and filthy, such as " the hair that grew
in the nether part of a wolf's tail, the penis of a wolf, the brain
of a cat, the brain of a newt, the brain of a lizard, a certain
fish called ' remora,' and the bones of a green frog which
had been left bare by ants." Young swallows were buried in
the earth and after a time disinterred. The bodies of those
that were found with open biUs were believed to provoke
love, while those with closed beaks were given to produce the
opposite effect.
The testicles of certain animals were employed, selected
doubtless for a physiological reason, and the menstrual blood,
especially that of a red-haired woman, was highly esteemed
and was believed to produce powerful effects.
LOVE-PHILTRES AND POISONS 213
Poisonous properties were attributed to the blood of both
men and animals by the ancients.
Herodotus states, that Psammenitus, King of Egypt, was
put to death by Cambyses by means of a draught of bullock's
blood. Themistocles, who wished to die rather than fight
against his countrymen, is also said to have drunk a goblet of
the blood of a sacrificial ox and to have expired shortly after-
wards. Zacutus Lusitanus relates several instances of the
evil effects resulting from drinking blood and records the case
of a student to whom was given in joke two ounces of the
blood of a red-haired woman, mixed with sugar, with the
result that he became insane.
In the Anglo-Saxon Leechdoms, an ointment composed of
goat's gall, incense, goat's dung and nettle seeds is recom-
mended as an application to promote passion.
Another substance highly esteemed as an ingredient in
love-philtres was the mysterious hippomanes, which is described
as " a growth found on the forehead of a newly born foal,"
to which Ovid alludes in the lines previously quoted.
Love- philtres and charms were also used by Eastern nations,
and the Hindus still err^ploy mango, champac, jasmine, lotus
and asoka for this purpose. According to Albertus Magnus,
the most powerful herb for promoting love is the " Provinsa,"
the secret of which, he says, has been handed down from the
Chaldeans. The Greeks called this plant Vorax. This is
probably the same plant now known to the Sicilians as
" Pizzu'ngurdu," to which they attribute remarkable proper-
ties. They believe that if given surreptitiously it wiU provoke
an ardent passion in the heart of the coldest and most chaste
woman. The Sicilians have also great faith in the power of
hemp to secure the affection of those on whom they set their
hearts, and they gather this plant with certain ceremonies.
" As touching this kind of witchcraft," says a writer of the
sixteenth century, " the principall part thereof consist eth in
certain confections prepared by lewd people to procure love
which indeed are mere poisons, bereaving some of the benefit
of the braine and some of the sense and understanding of the
minde." Yet even such men as Van Helmont believed in the
efficacy of the love-philtre. Writing in the middle of the
seventeenth century, he says, " I know a plant of common
214 POISON MYSTERIES
occurrence which if you rub and cherish it in the hand till it
becomes warm, and take the hand of another and hold it
until it becomes warm, that person will forthwith be stimu-
lated with love for you and continue so for several days."
Reginald Scot states wolf's penis was an ingredient in the
love-philtre of his time, and Frommaun mentions human skull,
coral, verbena, urine and leopard's dung.
The mandrake root, which was a common ingredient in love-
philtres in ancient times, is still worn in some parts of France
as a charm for that purpose, and in Germany a belief in the
power of endive seed to influence the affections still exists.
In Italy basil was used to inflame the heart of the indifferent,
and a young man who accepted a sprig of this plant from the
hand of a maiden was sure to be inspired with love for her.
Satyrion is another herb which is claimed to possess amatory
properties, while other species of orchis, when eaten fresh, was
believed to inspire pure love, and when dried was employed
to check illicit passion.
Of other plants employed in the composition of love-philtres,
mention should be made of the cyclamen, carrot, purslane,
cummin, maidenhair, valerian, navel wort, wild poppy,
anemone, crocus, periwinkle, pansy and the root of the male
fern, which has an ancient reputation for inspiring the tender
passion, although, curiously enough, its present use in medicine
is as a vermifuge.
But superstition dies hard, and even at the present day the
belief in the efficacy of love-charms is not yet dead in some
parts of England. Among the uneducated in some parts of the
country " All Hallow Een " is dedicated to the performance
of certain love charms, in which the gum resin called dragon's-
blood and quicksilver play an important part. Quite recently
a Russian Jewess in the East End of London was indicted with
having obtained money by false pretences from two women.
From one, whose husband had deserted her, she obtained
money to purchase candles into which she stuck pins which
she said would attract the husband to his home again. This
charm, however, did not work satisfactorily, and she insisted
on having a nightdress, some sheets and pillow cases which
she said she could prepare with a secret process so that one
night the wife would wake up and find her husband beside
LOVE-PHILTRES AND POISONS 215
her. He would be wearing the nightdress, and the pillow
cases she had treated with something which would have the
wonderful power of preventing her husband ever again run-
ning away.
But all those charms failed, and even the final effort, in
which a magic liquid was sprinkled about the room and the
wearing of the clippings from the back of a black cat, proved
useless in restoring the missing husband.
To the other woman, who wished her intended husband, to
come from Russia, this modern magician gave two curious
powders, with instructions that they were to be placed on the
end of a hairpin and consumed in a flame which would show
the man's love for her.
This modern witch's practice, which was said to be a large
and lucrative one, was suspended for nine months in gaol,
to be followed by deportation to her native land.
Ginseng root, which has been used for centuries in China
to promote longevity, is also recommended as a love-charm.
It is believed by the Chinese also to have the power of re-
juvenating the old and stimulating the senses of the young.
Among primitive peoples the love-philtre is still in vogue,
and Mr. P. A. Talbot found it generally used among the tribes
in Southern Nigeria, through which he travelled, especially
among the mysterious race called the Ibibios, who live in the
Eket district of the country. " It is a custom," he states,
" for a love-potion to be given by men and women to gain the
hearts of those whom they desire, or to wrest affection from
rivals."
A few years ago some extraordinary stories were revealed
in the trial of the wife of a wealthy man living at Lakewood,
Ohio, who was believed to have been murdered. It was stated
during the trial that a spiritualistic practitioner had been
called in by the lady who had administered to her husband
a magic potion or philtre which contained arsenic ; when
this failed, he is said to have been assassinated.
CHAPTER XXI
POISONS IN FOOD
Poison in Beer — Poison in Food— Poison in Honey-
Poison in Cocoa and Chocolate
IN the latter part of the year 1900 a fairly widespread
epidemic of peripheral neuritis of the extremities and
its attendant symptoms was noted by medical men in certain
districts of Manchester. In addition, many of the sufferers
complained of swelling of the legs, weak circulation, vomiting
and pigmentation of the skin. It was noted by the medical
officers of the various hospitals who examined these patients
that in every case they were heavy beer drinkers, and patron-
ized public-houses supplied from certain breweries.
The mysterious epidemic spread and cases were reported
from different parts of the north of England. In Manchester
and Salford there were five hundred and twenty-two cases,
in Liverpool seventy-one, fifty at Birkenhead and fifty at
Stourbridge ; at Darlaston, Staffordshire, there were upwards
of fifty cases, forty were reported from Chester, thirty-two in
Birmingham and thirty in Leeds and district.
Many deaths ensued, and the whole train of symptoms
and circumstances were such that, had they happened two
or three hundred years ago, they would have created con-
sternation.
The beer was the clue, and scores of samples were purchased
at public-houses miles apart, and the ingredients used in the
manufacture of the beer in breweries spread over the North
of England were carefully examined. Dr. Hit chin, the
Medical Officer of Health for Heywood, Lanes, stated that
two or three hundred persons were attacked, and he discovered
arsenic in stout as well as beer.
The result of the aneJysis was startling, as in llic majority
216
POISONS IN FOOD 217
of the cases it led to the discovery of arsenic. This was first
detected by Dr. Reynolds, of Manchester, and at his instance
the public were warned against drinking cheap beer.
Meanwhile, research into the whole mystery went on.
That large quantities of the beer were contaminated was
certain, but how the poisonous substance got into it was the
question which had to be determined.
A clue was found when certain experts who were engaged in
investigating the materials used in the brewing of certain
kinds of cheap beer, discovered that in every instance glucose
had been used in the preparation, and on analysis of the
glucose it was found to be impregnated with arsenious
acid. This was followed by still further examination of the
materials employed in making the glucose, and it was found
that the sulphuric acid used for this purpose was brown in
colour and contaminated with arsenic, showing that it had
been made from iron pyrites containing arsenic as an im-
purity, and thus the ring of evidence was complete and
successful.
This opened up possibilities of even more widespread poison-
ing. Samples of jams and golden syrup were obtained for
analysis, but all gave negative results when tested for arsenic.
It appears that there are only about a dozen manufacturers
of glucose in England, a great deal of it being imported from
America. It was therefore concluded that the makers of the
contaminated glucose must be some particular firm who sold
their product to brewers only, and that within a certain area.
Some samples of glucose that were subjected to test showed in
one instance a proportion of arsenic that was absolutely deadly,
and this was located to one firm. They instantly sent out
telegrams to their customers stopping the use of this ingredient.
Everything was done to prevent further mischief, and the out-
put of the poison-impregnated material was stopped. Heroic
measures were taken by one brewery, which placed an em-
bargo on aU the beer in the cellars of their customers, until it
was certified as pure by analysts deputed to visit them in
turn. Some brews were recalled wholesale, and the loss to
the firm amounted to several thousand pounds.
The next thing was to discover how the arsenic got into the
glucose during the process of manufacture, and this was traced
2i8 POISON MYSTERIES
down to a Spanish copper mine from whence p\Tites was
impj)rted by a firm of manufacturing chemists in a northern
county for the piu-pose of making sulphuric acid. The sul-
phuric acid in question was of the ordinary commercial variety,
generally used in works for dyeing and similar purposes.
It was usually of a bro^^Tlish colour, and even though it
was contaminated in any way for the purpose of such manu-
facture, no harm could ensue. If, however, without having it
tested to see if it was free from deleterious matter, the manu-
facturers should then use glucose containing this ordinary
commercial variety of sulphuric acid for their product, a con-
siderable amount of arsenic would remain in it. In this way
it was sold to brewers who used it in the manufactiue of their
beer, and this mineral poison was thus carried on through the
various processes tiU it reached the consumer \Wth the dire
consequences already described.
It is stated that brewers thought they could obtain a better-
coloured and more satisfactory^ beer by treating the malt w4th
invert sugar and glucose. Invert sugar is cane sugar boiled
in solution \\dth diluted sulphuric acid, and glucose is starch
boiled in a similar manner. It was obvious therefore that the
only ingredient which could have been contaminated with
arsenic was the sulphuric acid.
The manufacturers of the glucose had, of course, not the
faintest idea that the mysterious poison which had caused so
many deaths emanated from them. Although it was said
that the sulphuric acid was tested, curiously enough it was
admitted it was never tested for arsenic, and the explanation
was put forw^ard that the pyrites sent from the mine in Spain
had been obtained from a new lode which was charged with an
undue proportion of arsenic. After a full investigation had
been made, special precautions were laid upon brewers to
examine all ingredients used in making the beer, and since
this time no similar cases have been recorded.
The epidemic had developed into almost a panic in and
around Manchester, and several cases of ordinary illness were
put down to arsenical poisoning. The hospital wards were
filled, but the prompt measures taken had their effect. It was
said by the Manchester coroner at one inquest that the only
pleasant feature of the epidemic was for the temperance
POISONS IN FOOD 219
people. The consumption of fourpenny ale was not a fraction
so great as it was a fortnight previously. Arsenic had proved
a temperance argument.
Within the last few years many cases of food-poisoning of
one kind or another with fatal results have been reported.
It is probable that in spite of every precaution such cases
will occasionally occur. Some may have been due to the
fact that bacteria were actually living in the food at the time
it was consumed, or as probably in the case of the Loch
Maree fatalities, it may have resulted from toxins left by
bacteria which once lived in the food. The former type of
food-poisoning which is most common in this country results
from the eating of food which has become contaminated by
certain bacteria, whose presence may be due to disease in
the animal before it has been slaughtered, or if they have
gained access to the food in course of its preparation.
The heat used in cooking is generally sufficient to kill
such organisms, and no doubt it often does so. Again, it
may be introduced from the outside, as in a recent case when
the instrument of infection was found to be a contaminated
knife used in cutting ham for sandwiches.
In cases of food- poisoning due to a toxin formed by organ-
isms, these probably being dead, the organism concerned is
what is known as Bacillus hotulinus, so called from its
having first been discovered in German sausages. The
bacteria thrive especially in a mediimi in the absence of
oxygen, and so breed with rapidity in air-tight tins or inside
sausage skins, and are to be found even in vegetable matter.
They form a very powerful poison, acting upon the nerve
centres in the brain, causing paralysis of the muscles which
move the eye and eyelids and those concerned in speaking
and swallowing. The resulting disease known as botulism has
fortunately been rare in England, where there is not a very
large consumption of tinned meat or vegetables, but it has
been frequent in both America and Germany.
Botulism and food-poisoning, therefore, must not be con-
fused, as the former is a poisoning by a specific toxin and the
latter may be called an infection.
A very curious case of poisoning was brought to light some
years ago at an inquest held on a woman who had died with
220 POISON MYSTERIES
symptoms of poisoning after attending a wedding breakfast.
The guests, after regaling themselves with wedding cake, had
finished up with kippered herrings, and shortly afterward
one of them was taken ill with severe pain and died.
During the inquest it was pointed out, that it was possible
that some of the ingredients used in curing the kippers, when
brought into contact with almond paste on the wedding cake,
would possibly liberate prussic acid, if the almond paste
had been made with bitter almonds, in sufficient quantity to
cause death.
The poisonous effects produced by honey gathered in
certain districts has been known for centuries, and the story
of some of Xenophon's soldiers having been poisoned by this
means more than two thousand years ago is well known.
This poisonous property was formerly attributed to the bees
having gathered the honey from the flowers of henbane and
hemlock, which grow largely in the neighbourhood of Trebi-
zond, but it has now been proved that the poisonous principles
may be extracted by the bees from other plants, according
to the locality in which the honey is found. Thus American
honey has been found to contain poisonous ingredients derived
from gelsemium or golden seal.
A serious case in which fourteen persons were poisoned
from eating honey, one of whom died, is reported from Prince-
town, N.S. The honey was found to contain Andromedo-toxin,
a poisonous principle obtained from certain ericaceous flowers.
There are other instances on record of poisoned honey which
has been contaminated by bees which have carried poison
from certain flowers, but cases in which poison has been
introduced into honey for criminal purposes are rare.
Some years ago a young man was arrested at Coire, in Swit-
zerland, on his own confession of having murdered two young
women, to whom he had been engaged to be married, by intro-
ducing strychnine into the cells of some honeycomb which
he presented to his victims. In each case the girls died in
great agony on their wedding eve, after a visit from the man.
One victim had been buried two years, and the other some
months, before suspicion was aroused and the bodies exhumed
for examination, and the man was convicted of the crime.
Within recent years the contamination of food substances
POISONS IN FOOD 221
with arsenic has come into some prominence, not only in con-
nection with certain cases in which chocolate sweetmeats have
been used as a medium for the administration of arsenic,
but also in substances in common use, such as cocoa. To-
wards the end of November, 1922, the Public Analyst, acting,
for the Reigate Town Council, reported on seven samples of
cocoa that had been taken under " The Sale of Foods and
Drugs Act," and he found that one contained arsenic (arsenious
oxide) to the extent of i/75th grain to the pound of cocoa. It
was obvious that such a report could not be allowed to remain
unnoticed, as, according to the Royal Commission on Arsenical
Poisoning, it is illegal for an article of food to contain i/iooth
of a grain or more of arsenic per pound.
The matter was reported to the Minister of Health who
took a serious view of it, and it culminated in two summonses
being issued by the Surrey County Council against the vendor
and the manufacturer, the charge being that the cocoa was
" adulterated with arsenic (arsenious oxide) to the extent of
i/40th of a grain per pound."
The cocoa had been purchased at a shop in Richmond and
was labelled " Pure Cocoa Essence. Guaranteed absolutely
pure Cocoa." On analysis this sample was found to contain
I /40th of a grain per pound, but on inquiry from the manu-
facturers it appeared to be a mystery how the arsenic was
introduced into the cocoa. The investigation was rendered
more difficult when it was found that the actual sample pur-
chased was a blend of seven different cocoas ; however, samples
of these were taken, and one was found to contain arsenic to
the extent of i/ioth of a grain per pound.
On tracing back the source of contamination it appears
that an alkali such as potassium carbonate is mixed with
cocoa to render it more soluble, and in this case the impurity
was discovered in the potassium carbonate, which was found
to contain a substantial quantity of arsenic. The manu-
facturers, on finding this out, sacrificed three hundred and
fifty tons of cocoa and did everything they could in the inter-
ests of the public to stop the sale. The retail firm, directly
they heard of the impurity, also withdrew sixty-five tons
from their shops and twenty-five tons from their warehouses
and had them destroyed.
222 POISON MYSTERIES
Although potassium carbonate is not used in the making
of chocolate, several cases have been reported of illness caused
through eating sweets in this form.
About the same time a London lady was taken seriously
ill after eating some marzipan sweets which she purchased at
a Church bazaar. It appears she ate about half a dozen
of them and became ill shortly afterwards, the symptoms
pointing to arsenical poisoning.
Although powdered glass has been used for criminal pur-
poses from time to time, it is not generally known that glass
itself may be contaminated with arsenic.
Some time ago it was found on making an analysis of a bottle
that the glass contained both arsenic and lead, insomuch that
they probably contaminated some potassium carbonate that
had been kept in the bottle.
The danger in careless packing and handling of arsenic
imported to this country has recently been commented on by
the Medical Officer of Health for the Port of London. He
states in a report, that " a ship from Oporto had aboard about
fifty bags of shelled almonds. On the same deck were twenty-
two cases of white arsenic.
" When examined by the inspector two of these cases of
arsenic were standing on end with their heads open, and one
was leaking at its bilge on to the deck.
" Two of the bags of almonds which had become displaced
showed arsenic on their surfaces. Minute quantities of
arsenic were found on almonds taken from one of the bags."
In another case a ship had landed i6o cases of arsenious
acid at the King George V Dock.
" The cases containing the arsenic were composed of old,
dry wood, and from some of them the poison was leaking on
to the floor of the shed. The possibility that some of it might
find its way into any food handled in the same shed cannot
be overlooked.''
That such carelessness might lead to very serious conse-
quences is obvious.
CHAPTER XXII
POISONS USED IN WARFARE
THE use of poison as a weapon in warfare is not by any
means a modern practice. It may be traced back to
the use of poisoned arrows and spears, and from the time of
the discovery of gunpowder, when surgeons beheved that
a bullet formed a septic wound.
Francois Bernier, who died in Paris in 1688, served in the
capacity of physician to Aurungzebe, the Grand Mogul. In
describing a battle fought at Agra against the Mogul, he states
that the Rajputa, a hereditary race of warriors, were great
opium-eaters and consumed it in large quantities, and when
going into battle they always doubled the dose to their soldiers,
which had the effect of rendering them insensible to danger.
" They threw themselves," he states, " into combat like wild
beasts, knowing no retreat, and died at their Rajah's feet if
he would keep his post."
It was on April 22, 1915, that the French and Canadian
troops in the front line in the neighbourhood of Langemarck
saw what appeared to be a wave of curious green mist
approaching them which soon caused them to choke and gasp
and seemed to seize them in a deadly grip from which they
could not escape. A gap was made in the line in that sector,
but the results of this first use of poison gas in the Great
War, although serious, were not disastrous.
A thrill of horror went up from the Allied nations against
this fiendish manoeuvre, which was regarded as a crime against
humanity and will never be forgotten. The gas first used
was chlorine, the effects of which are well known, and was
liberated by the enemy from cylinders concentrated on a
front of six hundred yards. The first attack was evidently
made as an experiment, and in the interval, owing to the
223
224 POISON MYSTERIES
activity of our chemists, our men were supplied with a tem-
porary respirator as a defence from this new peril.
During the following months of May and June, several other
gas attacks were made by the Germans, but not on a very
large scale, as for some time the prevailing winds had been
in favour of the Allies, which would be likely to' blow the
deadly cloud back into the enemy's lines.
On December 19, 1915, a much more important attack with
poison gas was made on the British front in the Ypres salient,
on a front of three and a half miles. Gas was released con-
tinuously for an hour, but thanks to the protective measures
which had been adopted by this time, although 25,000 troops
are stated to have been in the area of attack, the casualties
were small.
Disappointed in the effects of their first essay with this
form of weapon, the Germans next introduced phosgene, a
very deadly vapour, and one against which the respirators
then used were no protection. A new type of respirator,
however, was speedily devised, and proved effective against
the danger. The gas helmet with its special filter, invented
by Lieut.-Colonel Harrison, came into use, and our men
became very quick in placing it in position.
In August 1916 they launched a highly concentrated
phosgene attack against the Allied lines, on a hot and stifling
day, the effects of which were felt as far as nine miles
behind the lines.
The uncertainty of the atmospheric conditions led the
Germans to adopt later another vile method of disseminating
poisons vapours, and they introduced the gas shell, of which
numerous varieties were eventually made. The contents
of these shells were distinguished by the Germans by special
marks in the form of coloured bands on the shell cases ; the
so-called " blue cross " contained diphenyl chlorasine, a sub-
stance which when scattered as a fine powder caused intense
sneezing to those in the neighbourhood of it. Two-thirds of
the shell were filled with high explosive, and the intention was
to produce uncontrollable sneezing, so that the wearing of a
respirator was made impossible.
Other gas shells were filled with di-phosgene (trichlor
methyl chlorformate), which formed a vapour of a very deadly
POISONS USED IN WARFARE 225
character immediately the shell burst and produced most
serious consequences. Another type contained in addition
to di-phosgene a quantity of chlorpicrin, which was not
only deadly, but produced extreme running at the eyes and
nose.
These vapours, however, were succeeded in July 1917,
in the neighbourhood of Ypres, by the use of di-chlor-
ethyl sulphide, called " mustard gas." Mustard gas is
undoubtedly one of the most terrible and deadly of the gas
poisons used. It not only blistered the skin and turned it
brown, but caused intense inflammation of the eyes and J ids,
the throat and nose, often causing permanent blindness and
loss of voice, and eventually producing septic broncho-
pneumonia, frequently ending in death.
In the autumn of that year it was used on a large scale
against the Italians, and largely assisted the Austro-German
armies in the break-through at Caporetto.
Clothing, boots, soil or other things which came in contact
with it were liable to affect seriously those brought near
them, days after the articles had been contaminated, but even
against this terrible weapon our gas masks were made effec-
tive, if put on with sufficient quickness and the men could
be warned in time.
In spite, however, of this fiendish weapon, the Allies held
their own, and were enabled by scientific and other means
to combat these attacks. It is satisfactory to note that,
however deadly were the gases employed, some means was
soon found to counteract them effectively.
The use of poison as a lethal weapon in the Great War was
by no means confined to deadly gases. Numerous instances,
many of which are undoubtedly authentic, were recorded
from 1914 to the time of the Armistice of poisoned sweetmeats
and disease organisms that were dropped from enemy aero-
planes in France and other countries.
On November 4, 1916, it was reported by cable that Prince
Mercier, the youngest child of King Ferdinand of Rumania,
who was only five years old, had died of typhoid.
According to Helen Vacarescu, the Rumanian poetess,
the Prince was the victim of poisoned sweets which were
dropped by German airmen into the streets of Bukarest and
p
226 POISON MYSTERIES
other cities of Rumania. Some of these sweets are said
to have fallen into the garden of the Royal Palace, and the
little Prince while playing there took some up and ate them.
According to Miss Vacarescu, he fell sick almost immediately,
and when he told about the sweets he had eaten, a search was
instituted, and some of them were found in the garden. On
a scientific investigation being made of these, they were
found to be impregnated with typhoid bacilli. According to
Le Temps it is said that all the families who ate the sweets
died.
According to The Times of October 31, 1916, an aeroplane
coming from Transylvania scattered about boxes of poisoned
sweetmeats for the purpose of murdering children, and this
excited the greatest indignation in the district. According
to further reports, several of the sweets contained the micro-
organisms of various infectious diseases.
On October 12, 1916, a report was received from Petrograd
of an enemy air squadron which dropped bombs on Constanza,
the Rumanian Black Sea port, as well as darts and poisoned
sweets saturated with cholera bacilli.
According to an official report, on October 9, 1916, a squad-
ron of eight German aeroplanes flew over Bukarest at eleven
o'clock one morning and dropped bombs in the neighbourhood
of some linen warehouses. The damage done was insignificant,
but an investigation of the German Legation led to the dis-
covery of numerous cases of high explosive buried in the
garden, as well as phials labelled Virus Morbi Glanders, which
are supposed to have been sent to propagate an epidemic
against cattle and horses in the country. The discovery is
vouched for by a representative of the United States Legation.
In May 1917 it was reported from Rome that during an
Austrian air-raid over Codigaro, near Ferrara, sweets were
thrown out which were found to contain cholera bacilli.
The local authorities issued an order directing that all wells
thereafter should be kept covered.
On December 17, 1917, an account is reported of an air-raid
on Calais, where the Germans dropped a number of small
boxes bearing instructions in English to the effect that they
contained soup-powder. Directions were given to dissolve
the powder in water and to add to it a pint of boiling liquid.
POISONS USED IN WARFARE 227
Several deaths resulted from using these packets, and an
analysis proved that they contained an extremely virulent
poison.
On February 20, 1918, it was reported from Southend that
when a raiding Gotha passed over the town the previous
Monday night, a curious patter was heard on the roofs of some
houses in the district. In the morning a number of sweets
about the size of small eggs were found in the roadway and
gardens, believed to have been dropped from the enemy
aeroplane. They were handed to the medical officer of health
for Southend, who reported that he had discovered traces of
arsenic in the sweets found on the public footpath.
On July 29, 1917, a sensation was caused in America
by an announcement made by the Attorney-General, that
expert examination had disclosed the presence of tetanus
germs in court plaster which was believed to have been dis-
tributed by German agents, and he essayed to warn the public
to avoid using plaster of that description. The New York
State Health Department published a statement that speci-
mens of such plaster sold by pedlars had been sent to the
State laboratory for examination. Despatches had been
received from Western and Southern areas of the United
States, reporting epidemics of anthrax in herds in the same
region, after the use of such plaster recommended for cuts
and other injuries to cattle.
Poison was used extensively in various ways by the Ger-
man forces, although frequently where wells were said to
have been poisoned, our men drank from them freely without
any bad results. On the other hand it was not uncommon in
some cases to find, left behind in trenches, large tins of cocoa
and other tempting commodities which on analysis proved
to be contaminated.
The use of bacteriological methods was also not neg-
lected by the enemy, and it was stated in a despatch from
Washington on July 9, 1917, that the Germans, before
evacuating the territory west of St. Quentin, inoculated
the French inhabitants, men, women and children, with
tuberculosis bacilli. The New York World commissioned
Dr. Theodore C. Beebe, a pathologist, of Boston, in
charge of the American Ambulance Hospital at Neuilly,
228 POISON MYSTERIES
to make an independent investigation of this matter. Dr.
Beebe, in his report, states that while there was no way to
obtain indubitable proof of the allegation, the evidence
pointed to the belief that the Germans made a deliberate
attempt to spread tuberculosis throughout France under
the pretence of vaccinating the inhabitants to protect them
from smallpox which they said was sweeping over the coun-
try. Dr. Beebe pointed out that only those persons vaccinated
developed tuberculosis, while unvaccinated children and
older persons, although suffering from pneumonia and other
diseases, showed no trace of it. He found these inoculations
were never made until a month or six weeks before the Ger-
mans were evacuating the place ; in other words, when it
became apparent to the Germans that they were forced to
retreat. Of course only an examination of the serum at the
time of the inoculation would determine whether it contained
tuberculosis bacilli or not ; that of course was impossible, but
the investigator concluded that the facts he had ascertained
led him to the belief that the charge brought against Germany
of having committed this most horrible crime was true.
On March 30, 1917, it was reported that a discovery had
been made of a plot to kill the cavalry horses within the
British lines. This was to have been done by bacteriological
cultures introduced into the food or by making a wound inside
the horse's nostril with a contaminated wire. This plot, which
was discovered in time, was part of the German plan of retire-
ment, but was fortunately found out and frustrated before
any casualties occurred.
In the latter part of June 1918 some sensation was caused
in London by a story that was circulated of a mysterious man
who was distributing chocolate sweets broadcast. At that
time most of the conductors of omnibuses were women. Sus-
picions were aroused when two of these women, after accepting
chocolates from a male passenger, who was said to have been
well dressed, became ill. Two omnibus girls and a tramway
girl who accepted some sweets in the same way, handed them
over to the Metropolitan Police, and the authorities were
placed on the watch ; in almost every case the sweets were
offered by the man when he was in the act of descending.
At Cedar's Road, Clapham, the same man gave a tramway
POISONS USED IN WARFARE 229
conductress a box containing five chocolates. The man is
reported to have said, " You won't taste any more hke this
for years to come." The girl, having been warned by a police
notice posted in the tramway depot, did not eat any of
them. Several cases were reported from the East End, and
several chocolates were found on omnibus seats after passen-
gers had left. The object of the mysterious individual not
having achieved its effect, his operations eventually ceased, and
nothing further was heard of the matter.
Probably the only case on record of the use of a poison gas
in an attempt to murder, was reported from Germany in
November 1922, when two men were charged at Leipzig
with attempting to kiU a man called Scheidemann at Cassel
on Whit-Sunday. They carefully charged glass syringes with
cyanogen gas, and secreting them in their pockets, they
awaited the coming of their victim, and discharged the poison
gas in his face. Scheidemann eventually recovered, and the
two men were convicted of an attempt to kill him.
During the Napoleonic Wars the curious suggestion was
made by Perceval that the Allies could bring the French to
their knees by prohibiting the importation to the Continent of
cinchona bark and other valuable drugs. " The suggestion,"
says a writer of the time, " is well worthy of the statesman.
To bring the French to reason by keeping them without
rhubarb, and exhibiting to mankind the awful spectacle of a
nation deprived of natural salts ! Without castor oil they
might for some months be able to carry on a lingering war, but
could they do without bark ? Will the people live under a
Government where antimony cannot be procured ? WiU
they bear the loss of mercury ? Depend upon it they will
soon be brought to their senses, and the cry of ' Bourbon and
Bolus ' be raised from the Baltic to the Mediterranean ! "
CHAPTER XXIII
CRIMINAL POISONING WITH BACTERIA
THE exploitation of pathogenic bacteria for criminal
purposes has not been neglected by the poisoner, but
owing to ignorance on the one hand, and the difficulty of
obtaining the material on the other, it has led to failure even
with the most cunning. The person with sufficient scientific
knowledge to prepare cultures is not as a rule one with criminal
instincts, and the clumsy handling of such deadly material
would lead to certain detection if used by one who did not
understand it.
One of the most remarkable cases on record occurred in
Petrograd in 1911, when a man named Patrick O'Brien de
Lacy, said to have been a lineal descendant of the Irish kings,
was accused of having procured the death of his brother-in-
law, an official in the Ministry of the Interior, his father-in-law.
General Buturlin, and his mother-in-law, in order to inherit
a large amount of money of which rumour said they were
possessed.
From his youth upwards O 'Brian de Lacy is said to have
been a ne'er-do-well. Having left a Russian school without
finishing his education, he frequented the London Poly-
technic, and also studied naval architecture, but aU the plans he
founded upon his technical knowledge were nullified by the
defeat of the Russian navy at Tsushima and other events.
He first married a lady of excellent family, who, being herself
married, agreed to divorce her husband in order to espouse
him. He then entangled her in all his own financial difficulties,
spent her money, and obtained power of attorney to transact
her business. Finally, making the acquaintance of a Mdlle
Buturlin, he divorced his first wife as she divorced her first
husband. Then he sought out a Dr. Panchenko and con-
2^0
CRIMINAL POISONING WITH BACTERIA 231
spired with him to poison the lady before pledging his troth
to her at the altar. After his second marriage, O'Brien
is said to have laid his plans to remove every human
obstacle that stood between him and his father-in-law's
wealth with extraordinary cunning, and these he endeavoured
to carry out by inoculating them with the germs of deadly
diseases which included cholera and diphtheria. He arranged
his scheme even to the smallest detail, and if there is such
a thing as a genius in crime, this most extraordinary man
was typical of it.
Having to employ a medical man to carry out his designs,
like Romeo he selected a needy practitioner named Panchenko,
before whose eyes he dangled a dazzling reward. Money
was the magnet to attract Panchenko, and O'Brien de Lacy
offered him, it is said, 10,000 roubles to compass the death of
his brother-in-law, 50,000 roubles to dispose of his father-in-
law, and 500,000 roubles if he put a speedy end to his mother-
in-law, who was the richest of the family.
In 1910 the younger Buturlin died at Petrograd after a
week's illness. He was an employee of the Ministry of the
Interior, and symptoms during his illness or signs after death
suggested foul play. Old General Buturlin, who arrived from
Vilna before the funeral, stopped the interment of his son's
body and demanded a post-mortem.
His widow endorsed this demand, both surmising neglect
on the part of the physician, but on investigation it was
concluded that blood-poisoning was the cause of death.
By a curious coincidence, on the same day, a man named Bob-
roff called on the Chief of the Secret Police. He told him he
was a book-keeper and that a comrade of his named Petro-
pavlovsky possessed proofs that young Buturlin's death was
caused by Dr. Panchenko, who had also designs on the life of
the General with a view to inheriting property. Petro-
pavlovsky's story is a very curious one and may be given in
his own words :■ —
" A conscience is the only possession I can call my own,
and it has driven me here to denounce my unique benefacfress.
She is my landlady, Madame Muraviova, who allows me a
room in her flat, and has been very kind to me. She is ths
mistress of Dr. Panchenko, with whom she has been hugger-
232 POISON MYSTERIES
muggering of late in suspicious ways. The door and walls
being thin, I have heard snatches of conversation, which I
have pieced together, and I find they point to Dr. Panchenko
as the instrument of young Buturlin's death and O'Brien
de Lacy as the employer of that instrument. The penni-
less Dr. Panchenko often journeyed to Vilna, where O'Brien
de Lacy resides, and always returned with a fat purse and
high hopes. Madame Muraviova, too, babbled about her
improving prospects, saying she was shortly coming into
300,000 roubles.
" One day in April, Dr. Panchenko left for Kronstadt, where
plague-stricken dogs are studied, and after his return he talked
of little else. Soon afterwards young Buturlin, Panchenko,
and O'Brien de Lacy went on the spree together. The next
thing I noticed was that Panchenko was weeping and sobbing.
I entered the common sitting-room, and found him beside him-
self with excitement while his paramour was burning heaps of
papers. She spoke first, saying that she had been scolding
him for visiting a diphtheria patient without disinfecting
himself. In an aside to Dr. Panchenko she asked, ' Did you
do it properly ? ' He answered, ' Well, I squirted two full
doses, although one would have been enough.' "
After this revelation, Dr. Panchenko was interrogated by
the police, and he stated, that he treated the deceased for loss of
energy and injected a certain remedy, but knew nothing of the
cause of death. He had made O'Brien de Lacy 's acquaintance
in the train, and subsequently had business dealings with him.
De Lacy was then asked for an explanation by the police, and
he stated that his relations with the doctor were purely com-
mercial, and he affirmed that he could not possibly benefit
by young Buturlin's death. The police, however, attached so
much irnportance to the story of the informer that they
arrested Panchenko and O'Brien de Lacy.
It was while in prison awaiting trial that Panchenko broke
down and revealed the full story in the following words :• —
" Patients were brought to me occasionally by a friend
named Raffoff, who acted as a tout, receiving a share
of the profits. One day he introduced me to O'Brien de
Lacy. We adjourned to a private room in a restaurant,
where, in Raffoff' s presence, he asked me if I would perform
a certain illegal operation for 1,500 roubles. I assented.
CRIMINAL POISONING WITH BACTERIA 233
O'Brien de Lacy seemed pleased, and gave me 100 roubles.
I asked him to visit me in my own study. I was a physician
of the St. Petersburg district of the Northern Railway.
" Subsequently O'Brien intimated that he would prefer
to talk with me without a witness. I acquiesced. He told
me he had just become a bridegroom, and the operation he
really wanted was to have his future brother-in-law made
away with. For this service he would pay 10,000 roubles.
After that it would be necessary to remove the father-in-
law. For that riddance I would be paid 50,000 roubles, and
lastly, the old man's divorced wife must be launched into
eternity. For this job he would not grudge 500,000 roubles.
He impressed upon me the necessity of extreme circumspec-
tion, and advised me to begin with young Buturlin, to whom
he proposed I should administer cholera germs on bread,
buttered and covered with caviare. Death by cholera, he
explained, would evoke no surprise at a moment when that
epidemic was making havoc in Petrograd. Therefore he
had much to say in favour of cholera germs, and informed me
that young Buturlin was using anti-cholera subcutaneous
injections.
" By this time I had extracted 2,000 roubles from O'Brien de
Lacy. At last he introduced me to Buturlin, on the ground that
we were interested in founding a sanatorium, but I was to whet
his curiosity about a certain drug and get him as a patient.
Then, instead of the drug, I was to inject some poison or
other, and having done the job, to abstain sedulously from
writing or telegraphing, as a kinsman of his. Count Roniker,
who had been charged with murder in Warsaw, had been
tripped up by a telegram. The plan was successful ; I
treated young Buturlin, substituting diphtheria toxin for
the other drug.
" I received the germs from a chemist, who believed my
story that it was required for experiments on rabbits. I
injected two large doses into the victim's thigh. Later, I
learned he was very ill, and, being conscience smitten, I wired
for O'Brien de Lacy, who was furious that the telegram should
have been sent. He exclaimed, ' You may as well give your-
self up now.' I visited young Buturlin after this, and learned
from his own lips that he had had high fever and sharp pains,
but was now much belter. The other physician who was
called in did not diagnose the malady. Then I read of
Buturlin's death in the papers. It occurred exactly as had
been calculated, seven days after the injection. Wlien I
234 POISON MYSTERIES
read that the day of the burial would be announced later, I
knew it boded evil.
" Meanwhile, General Buturlin arrived and demanded a
post-mortem. O'Brien de Lacy supported the demand,
convinced that the examination would be fruitless. I, too,
was of the same opinion, because throats are never analysed
during such investigations, and few symptoms of diphtheria
infection would be visible in the throat."
That is Dr. Panchenko's last definitive story, to which he
added that Muraviova was innocent, having had no inkling
ol his crime. Muraviova herself asseverated her innocence,
affirming that her relations with Panchenko were pure. She
accepted material help from him, but deprecated the luxury
in which he maintained her. He, however, assured her that
he would soon inherit a large sum.
The trial of the prisoners began in Petrograd at the end of
January 191 1, and excited intense public interest. Bobroff,
the book-keeper, who gave away the secret to the Chief of
Police, was first examined and adhered to his original story,
A servant of the Buturlins related how Dr. Panchenko visited
Buturlin for the first time, saying, " Let's get the treatment
over before your wife returns." After that he came twice
daily until the fourth day, when the patient fell ill. When
his condition grew serious, Buturlin sent for the doctor, but
Panchenko was not to be found. A chance physician had to
be summoned, but produced no improvement. Nose-bleeding,
vomiting, and sharp pains ushered in the agony, during which
the dying man said, " Three months long they were at me to
have the injections, but I refused as though I had a presenti-
ment of what was coming."
The Court asked the experts to answer the question, " What
caused Buturlin's death ? " and asked them to bear in mind
Panchenko's admission that he had injected diphtheria toxin,
when he made the following statement : —
" On May 16 I visited Buturlin, and injected a pure drug
from a phial. I repeated the injection on the following day.
Before my evening visit to Buturlin on the sam.e day I broke
the necks of the two drug-phials in my own lodging that nobody
should notice it. Having emptied the contents, I filled|the
phials with diphtheria poison by means of a paper funnel,
CRIMINAL POISONING WITH BACTERIA 235
plugged them with wadding, and, putting them into my waist-
coat-pocket, set out for Buturhn's. Before starting I gulped
down vodka for courage.
" I got to Buturlin's about eight or nine in the evening,
with trembling in my legs and throbbing waves of darkness
filling my eyes and fitfully blotting out my sight I had been
wont to break off the necks of the phials in Buturlin's presence,
first putting them in a handkerchief to avoid cutting my fin-
gers. That is why he could not notice that this time the necks
were already snapped off. I made two incisions in Buturlin's
body, injecting each time the contents of one phial of the
diphtheria poison. Each vessel held about two cubic centi-
metres, but as the effects of the diphtheria poison had not been
tested on human beings, I injected two phials full in order to
be quite sure of a deadly issue. As soon as I had finished the
business my face was ghastly, and I quivered in every limb.
I was in dread that Buturlin might discern my state. Pulling
myself together, and mastering my failing voice, I asked him
whether it hurt. He answered, ' Not at all.' I then left for
home, and threw the phials into the street. The livelong
night I could not close an eye. Conscience-ache racked me
ruthlessly."
Panchenko's career, as revealed at the trial, certainly shows
him to be one of the most diabolical characters ever connected
with medicine and possibly the worst ever known.
He was sent by the Red Cross Society to Harbin during
the War, and was then dismissed for irregularities, after which
he introduced himself to the then Premier as a schoolmate
of the Premier's brother, and received an appointment as
physician to a railway company.
One witness recounted how a certain banker resolved to
poison his own uncle, and had recourse to Panchenko, who
initiated his friend Dreyden in the scheme. The latter used
the information as a lever to extort blackmail, but the police,
being hand in glove with the banker, sent Dreyden away.
Panchenko next edited a periodical entitled Life's Mysteries,
which was suppressed. Despatched to Paris for the purpose
of advertising a certain drug, Panchenko met a Russian officer
bound for Abyssinia, who asked him for a potent poison for
suicidal purposes in case he should be taken prisoner there.
For forty francs Panchenko furnished prussic acid, and the
236 POISON MYSTERIES
officer swallowed it and died. Panchenko now assured the
Court that what he supplied was not poison, but only mag-
nesia, and that in any case he had confessed since to a Russian
priest in Paris, who comforted him by saying, " The officer
would have committed suicide anyhow, my son."
To another witness Panchenko propounded a plan for com-
ing into a heritage of two million roubles by " removing " two
persons who stood in the way.
Circumstantial evidence was next offered by experts in the
culture of various toxins. Dr. Heinrich, assistant director of
the laboratory of plague cultures, spoke of Dr. Panchenko
visiting the laboratories, requesting cholera endotoxin, and
excusing himself from the obligation of writing his name in
the visitors' book on the ground of haste. Dr. Panchenko
received two tubes of endotoxin. One had a label that
a dose is mortal for certain animals. Some months later
Dr. Panchenko revisited the laboratory, and asked ior more
cholera endotoxin. Dr. Heinrich gave it, but warned him of
its deadly effects.
Dr. Panchenko informed the Court that he gave this
liquid to O'Brien de Lacy for twenty-five roubles.
Professor Zabolotny explained the nature of the effects of
various cultures, and deposed that he gave diphtheria toxin
to Dr. Panchenko, whose object was stated to be the study of
its action on the nervous system.
A professor, named Zdrjekoffsky, of the Institute of Ex-
perimental Medicine, deposed that Dr. Panchenko, early last
year, had asked him for diphtheria toxin.
" I gave him, I forget whether one or two phials of diphtheria
toxin, each containing thirty or forty cubic centimetres. I
explained to Dr. Panchenko the action of this toxin and the
minimum dose that would cause death."
A criminal called Logatcheff, with whom Panchenko had
shared a cell, and who was escorted to court by two soldiers,
deposed that Panchenko had repeated to him in gaol the whole
story of how he had poisoned Captain Buturlin. He said
De Lacy had offered him 550,000 roubles to poison Captain
Buturlin and the latter's father. General Buturlin, and
mother, and told him he went to Kronstadt, to the Zabo-
lotny Institute of Experimental Medicine to obtain toxins.
CRIMINAL POISONING WITH BACTERIA 237
Pancheriko had described experiments which he had made on
a guinea-pig at an hotel, adding that he afterwards threw the
body into the street.
De Lacy, while denying that he married for money, made the
following statement: " It is true that at one time I was afraid
that the general would dispose of his fortune in his will in such a
manner that my wife would receive only a fourteenth part.
I certainly thought this unjust, but I reasoned as follows :
The general is sure to live for a long time, and three years will
suffice for me to induce him to enter into all my undertakings,
including that of the steamboats. Then his whole capital
will be at my disposal."
Continuing, he said that he was not aware of the total
amount, but he knew that a sum of ;f300,ooo was deposited
in foreign banks.
At the end of this remarkable case, after a trial which lasted
nearly three weeks, O'Brien de Lacy and Dr. Panchenko were
found guilty, the latter with extenuating circumstances. The
woman Muraviova was acquitted. De Lacy was sentenced
to penal servitude for life and Panchenko to fifteen years'
penal servitude.
Another case of attempted murder with pathogenic organ-
isms occurred about ten years ago, when a Hungarian artist
was tried with attempting to murder his wife by means
of typhoid and cholera germs. The cholera medium in his
possession was found to have lost all activity by having been
kept too long, while the typhoid culture, though quite a
virulent one, failed to kill the victim. The discovery of his
crime was made through his attempts to obtain cultures
from a private laboratory and demanding virulent strains,
but so far, cases of this kind have been extremely rare,
and the risk of failure is so great that criminals so inclined
are likely to think twice before venturing to attempt life
by this method.
CHAPTER XXIV
POISON HABITS
Opium — Morphine — Chloroform — Ether — Chlorodyne —
Cocaine
THERE is a very peculiar property attached to certain
poisons, especially those possessing narcotic properties
— that is, they are capable of forming the most enslaving
habits known to mankind. Thousands of people to-day are
enchained in the slavery of the poison habit in one form or
another and very few are ever successful in wresting themselves
free when once it has been contracted. The habit is often
formed in a most insidious manner. It is usually begun by
taking some narcotic drug to relieve pain or induce sleep.
In a short time the original dose fails to produce the desired
effect, it has to be increased, and afterwards still further
increased, until the victim finds he cannot do without it, and
an intense craving for the drug is created. By and by
the stupefying action affects the brain, the moral character is
sapped, and the unfortunate being is at last ready to do any-
thing to obtain a supply of the drug that is now his master.
This is not an overdrawn picture, but one of which instances
are constantly to be met with. The enslaving habit of alcohol,
when once contracted, is too well known to need description.
Opium probably comes next in the point of influence it exerts
over its victims, and only a very small percentage ever free
themselves from the habit when it is once contracted. In most
instances, as stated, it is taken in the first place to relieve some
severe pain, as instanced in De Quincey's case. He says, in
his Confessions of an Opium-Eater: "It was not for the
purpose of creating pleasure, but of mitigating pain in the
severest degree, that I first began to use opium as an article
of daily diet." Like others, he was compelled to increase the
238
POISON HABITS 239
dose gradually, irntil at last he consumed the enormous quan-
tity of 320 grains of the drug a day. He graphically describes
the struggle he first had to reduce the daily dose, and found
that to a certain point it could be reduced with ease, but after
that point, further reduction caused intense suffering. How-
ever, a crisis arrived, and he writes, " I saw that I must die if
I continued the opium. I determined, therefore, if that should
be required, to die in throwing it off. I apprehend at this
time I was taking from 50 or 60 grains to 150 grains a day.
My first task was to reduce it to 40, to 30, and as fast as I
could to 12 grains. I triumphed ; but think not my sufferings
were ended. Think of me, as one, even when four months
had passed, still agitated, writhing, throbbing, palpitating,
shattered ; and much perhaps in the situation of him who has
been racked."
Other cases are commonly met with in this country, where
opium-eaters take on an average from 60 to 80 grains of
the drug a day. The smallest quantity which has proved
fatal in the adult is 4J grains ; in other cases much larger
quantities have been taken with impunity. Guy states that
recovery once took place after no less than eight ounces of
solid opium had been swallowed.
Morphine, the chief alkaloid of opium, is also abused by
many, and is swaUowed as well as used by hypodermic injec-
tion. Its action is very similar to that of opium. It has
been recently stated on good authority that in Chicago — that
city of hurrying men and restless women — over thirty-five
thousand persons habitually take subcutaneous injections of
morphine to save themselves from the pains and terrors of
neuralgia, insomnia, and nervousness. Dr. Van Dyke has
recently stated that " no country suffers more from the
narcotic drug evil than the United States. It is estimated that
there are more than 1,500,000 addicts, many of them boys
and girls."
To a delicate woman one grain of this drug has proved fatal,
yet, under the influence of habit, a young woman has been
known to take from 15 to 20 grains daily. A man in a good
position, and head of a large commercial house, contracted the
habit of taking morphine from a prescription that had been given
to him containing four grains of the drug. As the habit grew,
240 POISON MYSTERIES -
he would have the medicine prepared by four different chemists
daily, and swallow the contents of each bottle for a dose, until
he took on an average over 24 grains a day. This being put a
stop to by his friends, he commenced to take chloroform,
which he would purchase in small quantities until he had
collected a bottleful, and then he would drink it, usually mixed
with whisky. He eventually had to be placed under restraint.
A remarkable account of the sensations experienced when
under the influence of morphine was recorded by Dr. Albert
Herschmann who, after taking six grains of the drug, seated
himself at his desk and wrote notes of his sensations as death
approached, which were found afterwards.
" This morphine " he wrote, " has put me in a condition
of absolute mental painlessness. It is now 7.17 p.m. and if
I did not know that I had taken sufficient poison to warrant
results, I could not notice it from my condition.
" Aside from fluttering heart action and contracted eye
pupils, and moderate drowsiness, I feel no results.
" Still, I cannot make up my mind to swallow the cyanide,
and have lit a cigar, awaiting further increase of drowsiness,
and hope to be scon able to coax myself into the inevitable.
" 7.42 p.m. — I am here yet, hesitating to take this cyanide.
My thoughts become blurred from the morphine, and a
sensation of supreme quietude reigns in me. If it was not
for my beloved wife, who has just 'phoned, I would go on
waiting, but I am afraid of too long a delay because a lapsing
into unconsciousness might result in my being saved by
medical assistance. Ten more minutes, and then the end by
cyanide.
" I am in no manner kept in suspense — just pleasantly
and curiously watching developments. Queerly enough, my
only wish is that I had an additional handkerchief, so that
I could dispose of the surplus perspiration, it being close
and my skin clammy from the morphine effects."
Then the signature, "Dr. A. J. H."
Chloroform when swallowed is very similar in its effects to
alcohol, from which it is in fact prepared. It first excites
and then causes a condition of stupefaction, and although it
does not injure the stomach tissues and the liver to the same
extent as alcohol, the taking of it almost invariably ends in
POISON HABITS 241
death. Some of its victims drink the hquid diluted, and
others inhale it.
A case of a well-educated man is recorded who acquired
the habit of drinking chloroform. It was known to his
friends, and he did not deny it, but no one saw him take it,
until it was eventually discovered that he first secretly added
it to his whisky bottle, then diluted this mixture with a small
quantity of water and swallowed it at a draught. Its property
seemed to accentuate the intoxicating power of the alcohol.
Every effort was made to break him of the habit, without
success, without avail, and he eventually poisoned himself.
Another case of chloroform-drinking occurred in the East
End of London. The victim was a young chemist's assis-
tant, who had been in the habit of taking the drug since he
was fourteen years of age. According to his own admission,
he did not at first take it to alleviate pain, but began it as an
experiment before he had been in his first situation a month.
He got beyond the control of his parents, who notified the
chemists in the district, and when unable to obtain it there,
he called on various medical men and endeavoured to obtain
chloroform by false pretences. He was able to swallow con-
siderable quantities, and it was stated that he took enough
in an hour to kill six people.
One who was addicted to this terrible habit, states that
he began by " inhaling a small quantity, which was followed
by a perfectly delicious state of semi-unconsciousness in
which one lost sight of all discomfort and all things exter-
nal. But this state is very transient and passes rapidly.
The quantity has to be increased and increased until existence
becomes a perfect misery. The whole moral fibre and character
is swiftly ruined. Nausea is constant, dyspepsia and kindred
troubles follow ; and the victim becomes haggard and thin.
For the two hours of semi-unconsciousness induced in this
way, twenty- two hours are spent in unimaginable misery."
The quantity of chloroform used by those accustomed to
it in this way is said to be astonishing. One victim, a woman,
is known to have bought sixteen ounces a day, and inhaled
it from a blanket. Such a story sounds incredible, as a tea-
spoonful is sometimes sufficient to kill a strong person.
Some years ago the habit of taking ether became common,
Q
242 POISON MYSTERIES
especially in Ireland, Scotland and the eastern parts of
England. Its action is similar to chloroform, but it is slower in
its effect. It first produces exhilaration, and^ as with chloro-
form, when swallowed mixed with whisky, produces intense
excitement, amounting almost to mania. The habit, when
formed, is almost more terrible than chloroform, and the
victim has to resort to several doses a day.
Some years ago, in the North of Ireland, it was stated on
good authority that the population of one large district were
almost entirely ether drunkards. Its consumption has now
greatly diminished, probably owing to the increase in price
which occurred at the time of the war, which would put it out
of the reach of many of its victims.
Chlorodyne, which generally contains both morphine and
prussic acid in its composition, is also much abused, especially
by women. Some women have been known to consume as
much as two ounces a week of this preparation.
During the past few years the increase in the taking of
cocaine has probably surpassed all other poison habits.
Cocaine is an important alkaloid, prepared from the dried
leaves of the Erythroxylon Coca and other varieties of the
coca plant that grow in the northern parts of Peru and Bolivia.
For a considerable period before the active principle was
discovered, the leaves of the plant were much used by
natives of these countries and travellers, who chewed them
on account of their stimulating effect, much the same as
tobacco, but it was not until i860 that the active principle
cocaine was discovered by Niemann.
Its chief use in medicine is as a local anaesthetic, especially
for the eye. The discovery of this valuable property was due
to Eckstein, who, in 1870, pointed out that the most delicate
operations could be performed painlessly on the eye after
its injection.
The effect of cocaine taken by inhalation, injection or by
the mouth unfortunately became too well known. At one time
it was largely used as an ingredient in the preparations, used like
snuff, commonly recommended and sold for influenza colds.
The habit, once induced, led to the use of stronger preparations,
until the victim found he had become enchained by a habit
that enslaved him to such an extent it would seem impossible
POISON HABITS 243
to break. More subtle than other poisons, cocaine appears
to sap completely the moral strength of its victims. Slowly
and surely it deadens the sensibilities until death is sought
as a relief in the end.
During the past few years, and since the beginning of the
war, the consumption of cocaine in one form or another has
enormously increased in both the Eastern and Western
hemispheres. Recent cases that have been brought to light in
the police courts, show only too plainly the terrible condition to
which the victims of this habit are reduced. The cocaine
habit may be compared to a human being gradually enclosed
in the coils of a serpent, that slowly winds itself round the
body with increasing pressure, to the terror of its victim,
until it reaches a vital part, which ends in death.
Rarely is there any permanent breaking of the coil when
once it starts. In most cases the simple inhalation is the
beginning, and in the case of this poison it is not used as much
to relieve pain as for the pleasurable sensation that is produced.
From inhalation, the victim of the habit, finding the effects
weaken, passes to the hypodermic injection, which is more
rapid and more powerful in its action. As the coils of the
serpent tighten, all moral sense and character seem gradually
blotted out, and the whole individual physiologically is
altered.
Fatalities have resulted from inhaling cocaine through the
nose as well as by injecting it under the skin, and when
it is stated that three-quarters of a grain has been known to
cause death it can readily be imagined how easily a lethal
dose can be taken.
The subtlety of the habit lies in its very simplicity. Ex-
hilaration follows much more rapidly than after alcohol and
is followed just as speedily by the deepest depression.
To such an extent has the cocaine habit increased, that re-
cently the Government found it necessary to introduce fresh
legislation dealing with the traffic in poisonous narcotic drugs,
and the " Dangerous Drugs Act " was passed, and became law
in 1920. Stringent though this statute is, it has not stopped
the traffic in cocaine and opium. A great amount of smuggling
and illicit traffic in the drug is carried on in the underworld
of London, Paris and New York, and though the drug is costly,
244 POISON MYSTERIES
a ready market is found for it. This traffic has been found
rife in certain clubs of a low class, conducted by unscrupulous
men whose precautions as to secrecy have been ingeniously
conceived. The greatest cunning has been exercised in bring-
ing it from the Continent, where it is chiefly manufactured,
into Great Britain. A hollow cane containing a glass phial,
which, when concealed by a screwed silver top looked like
an ordinary walking-stick, was one method discovered a
short time ago. Another and still more artful device was
discovered by the Custom- House authorities on the landing
of a passenger at an East Coast port. As his appearance
aroused suspicion a search was made, and he was found to
be wearing a truss, the bulb end of which was hollow and
filled with cocaine.
In another case, where a man was arrested in the West End
and charged with being in possession of nearly five ounces
of cocaine, it was found that he had brought the drug from
Germany, and concealed it in cavities he had skilfully cut
out in the heels of his shoes, and had afterwards covered with
leather.
During the war, which increased the nervous tension of the
individual to a hitherto unknown degree, thousands of Canadian
and American troops passed through London on their way
to and from the fighting fronts, and many of the men provided
potential victims for the trafficker in poisons. Many of these
men who fell into bad hands were drugged with opium in the
form of cigarettes and then robbed.
In proof of this statement, on July 19, 1916, seven men
were charged at Marlborough Street Police Court with being
concerned in selling cocaine to soldiers. The prosecuting
solicitor for the Commissioner of Police said that the evil
had grown to such dimensions in London that it was necessary
for steps to be taken to check it. The use of cocaine in this
country had increased enormously, and the habit appeared
to have been brought here with soldiers from across the
seas. Since the war began it had been sold in the streets in
small boxes each containing a grain ; it was offered to soldiers
in particular, who were told to use it like ordinary snuff
on account of its exhilarating effect. The habit grew and
grew till it produced symptoms of intoxication, the moral and
POISON HABITS 245
physical senses were clouded, and insanity and death resulted.
The number of persons engaged in this abominable traffic
W£LS very large. The case having been proved against the
men by several members of the Military Police, they were
sentenced to various terms of imprisonment.
The efforts of the police to stop the traffic revealed the
existence of what is practically an organization for the sale
of the drug. The chief agents are men, mostly of foreign
nationality and the worst possible type. They sell it, often
adulterated with boric acid in small quantities, at enormous
profit. Women sell it to other women, one acting as a carrier,
being in the possession of a number of boxes of the drug, and
the other undertaking actually to sell it in single boxes.
The price of cocaine sold illegally in the West End of London
a year or two ago was at the rate of £10 an ounce, and as it
became more difficult to get, owing to the restrictions, the
price increased. A bottle containing two and a half ounces
was said to have been sold for £100.
In the autumn of 1922 there arrived at Hong-Kong a
Japanese steamer, which was boarded by Revenue officers.
A passenger who was a Japanese subject was arrested, and
a quantity of his belongings, which included four cases of
furniture, were seized. On examining the furniture, con-
sisting of two sofas and four arm-chairs, which were cut
open, there was found hidden in the upholstery 2,400 ounces
of morphine and 2,500 ounces of cocaine. The quantity of
morphine concealed in the furniture would provide 2,100,000
maximum doses, according to the British Pharmacopoeia, and
the quantity of cocaine was equal to 4,375,000 doses.
Legislation can play its part, but it will never eradicate
the traffic until the supply is stopped at its source. So far
as we know, Germany and Switzerland are the chief sources
of origin. Nearly all the cocaine sold in London is smuggled
into this country either by Chinese or foreigners, and it is
stated that before it gets into the hands of the actual victim,
quite a number of persons have made substantial profits out
of it. In most cases it has been traced to Limehouse and the
region of the London Docks or other seaports, where Conti-
nental steamers land, on the East Coast, and latterly to some
of the big seaports like Cardiff and Newcastle.
246 POISON MYSTERIES
These narcotics are rarely alluded to by those who trafific
in them by their proper names. As is well known, cocaine
is generally alluded to as " snow " or " C " ; heroin is " H " ;
opium is alluded to as " Chandoo " or " Pop."
Some young women conceive the idea that drug-taking
renders them more mysterious and fascinating ; indeed, vanity
plays a considerable part with many at the beginning, and
human curiosity impels the victim to go on. The beginner
cannot conceive the after-effect. The entire moral character
appears to be sapped and rendered inert, the victims sink down
unknown to themselves to the lowest depths of depravity and
degradation, all restraint is lost, and they become a prey to
those who may use them for any evil purpose at will.
Confirmed drug-takers cannot be cured by persuasion,
argument or attempted coercion, but they wUl have the drug
or they will die, and the only way of dealing with them and
preventing the drug habit, is to prevent its importation into
the country.
Insomnia is a frequent cause of the formation of a
poison habit, and for this purpose chloral hydrate is
capable of producing more serious results than any other
drug of its class. The fact that it accumulates in the system,
and that the dose needs constantly to be increased, always
renders its use dangerous in unskilled hands. Many gifted men
have fallen victims to the habit, among others Dante Rossetti,
who seldom was without a bottle of the narcotic near him.
Latterly, sulphonal and veronal, drugs derived from coal
tar, possessing hypnotic properties, have been largely taken ;
and antipyrine, also a popular remedy for headache, is capable
of forming a pernicious and dangerous habit. The practice
of self-dosing with drugs of this description cannot be too
strongly deprecated. In all cases they should only be taken
when ordered by a medical man.
Some people form a curious habit of taking one drug till at
last they become imbued with the idea that that only, and
nothing else, wiU have any effect on them. The only remedy
Thomas Carlyle would ever take, according to the late Sir Richard
Quain, who was his medical adviser, was "Grey Powder."
"Grey Powder," he states, "was his favourite remedy when he
had that wretched dyspepsia from which he suffered, and which
POISON HABITS 247
was fully accounted for by the fact that he was particularly fond
of very nasty gingerbread. Many times I have seen him,
sitting in the chimney corner, smoking a clay pipe and eating
this gingerbread." Oliver Goldsmith also laboured under
the confirmed belief that the only medicine that would have
any effect on him was " James' Powder." He doctored
himself with this favourite nostrum whenever he felt unwell,
and believed it to be a cure for all his ills.
CHAPTER XXV
HASHISH AND HASHISH-EATERS
HASHISH, or Bhang, is the native name appHed to the
dried flowering tops of the Indian hemp, from which
the resin has not been removed.
This plant, cultivated largely in India, is now considered
to be the same, botanically, as the Cannabis sativa of European
cultivation ; but there is great difference in their medicinal
activity, that growing in India being much more powerful.
Ganja is the native name for one part of the plant, and Sidhi for
another part, which is much poorer in resin. The resinous
principle is called churrus or char as, and the entire plant,
cut during inflorescence, dried in the sun and pressed into
bundles, is called bhang.
The method of using it in India is chiefly for smoking
in combination with tobacco. For this purpose, a plug of
tobacco is first placed at the bottom of the bowl of the pipe,
on the top a small piece of hashish, and over this a piece of
glowing charcoal. Another way is to knead the drug with the
tobacco by the thumb of one hand and working it in the palm
ofTthe other, till they are thoroughly incorporated.
In India both ganja and churrus are used for smoking, but not
bhang or sidhi. In India the habit of smoking ganja becomes
part of a man's life. Under ordinary circumstances he has his
smoke daily when his day's labour is over, and during the
interval when he cooks his evening meal. Under extra-
ordinary circumstances he takes it to sustain him in the midst
of severe or prolonged exertion. It does not (as in opium
smoking) affect his appetite, but enables the poorest to partake
with a heartier appetite of their somewhat uninviting fare.
It does not affect the digestion or interfere in the slightest
degree with bodily or mental health, and the habit does not
248
HASHISH AND HASHISH -EATERS 249
grow on the votary. Ganja-smoking appears to be only
injurious when indulged in to excess by those who lead
sedentary lives.
Simple infusions of the leaves and flowering tops are also
much used for drinking purposes by old and young in
India, the alcoholic form being a most active and dangerous
intoxicant.
The drug is said to have been used in China as early as
the year 220, to produce insensibility when performing
operations. The Persians employed it in the Middle Ages
for the purpose of exciting the pugnacity and fanaticism of
the soldiers during the wars of the Crusades.
In 1803 Visey, a French scientist, published a memoir on
hashish, and attempted to prove that it was the nepenthe
of Homer ; there is little doubt, however, that the use of
the drug was known to Galen.
Silvestin de Lacy contends that the word assassin is
derived from " hashishin," a name given to a wild sect of
Mohammedans who committed murder under its influence.
The Chinese herbal, Rh-ya, which dates from about the
fifth century B.C., notices the fact that the hemp plant is
of two kinds, the one producing seeds and the other flowers
only. Herodotus states that hemp grows in Scythia both wild
and cultivated, and that the Thracians made garments from
it which can hardly be distinguished from linen. He also
describes " how the Scythians exposed themselves as in a bath "
to the vapour of the seeds thrown on hot coals.
The hemp occurs in several forms and is known under
various names. Bhang consists of the entire plant dried
and mixed with a few fruits and is of a dark green colour.
It has a peculiar odour but little taste. Mixed with flour
or incorporated with sweetmeat it is called hashish. It is
also smoked or taken infused in cold water. Ganja consists
exclusively of the flowering shoots of the female plant, having
a compound or glutinous appearance, and is brownish-green
in colour. Majun is a term applied to a sweetmeat or confection, '
of which Indian hemp is the basis, but it may contain nux
vomica, opium, cantharides, or frequently datura seeds,
according to the purpose for which it is intended, whether as
an aphrodisiac or a criminal excitant or deliriant.
250 POISON MYSTERIES
Of the many curious experiences that have been written
describing the effects of hashish, perhaps the most accurate
is that given by Gautier, in which he relates his own experience
of the drug.
" The OrientaHsts," he states, " have, in consequence of
the interdiction of wine, sought that species of excitement
which the Western nations derive from alcohohc drinks."
He then proceeds to state how a few minutes after swallowing
some of the preparation, a sudden overwhelming sensation
took possession of him. It appeared to him that his body
was dissolved, and that he had become transparent. He
clearly saw in his stomach the hashish he had swallowed,
under the form of an emerald, from which a thousand little
sparks issued. His eyelashes were lengthened indefinitely,
and rolled like threads of gold around ivory baUs, which
turned with inconceivable rapidity. Around him were
sparklings of precious stones of all colours, changes eternally
produced, like the play of a kaleidoscope. He every now and
then saw his friends who were around him disfigured as half
men, half plants, some having the wings of the ostrich, which
they were constantly shaking. So strange were these that
he burst into fits of laughter, and, to join in the apparent
ridiculousness of the affair, he began by throwing the cushions
in the air, catching and turning them with the rapidity of
an Indian juggler. One gentleman spoke to him in Italian,
which the hashish transposed into Spanish. After a few
minutes he recovered his habitual calmness, without any bad
effect, and only with feelings of astonishment at what had
passed. Half an hour had scarcely elapsed before he again
fell under the influence of the drug. On this occasion the
vision was more complicated and extraordinary. In the air
there were millions of butterflies, confusedly luminous,
shaking their wings like fans. Gigantic flowers, with chalices
of crystal ; large peonies upon beds of gold and silver rose
and surrounded him with the crackling sound that accompanies
the explosion in the air of fireworks. His hearing had acquired
new^ power ; it was enormously developed. He heard the
noise of colours. Green, red, blue, yeUow sounds reached
him in waves — a glass thrown down, the creaking of a sofa,
a word pronounced low, vibrated and rolled within him like
HASHISH AND HASHISH-EATERS 251
peals of thunder. His own voice sounded so loud that he
feared to speak lest he should knock down the walls or explode
like a rocket. More than five hundred clocks struck the hour
with fleeting silvery voice, and every object touched gave a
note like the harmonica or the iEolian harp. He swam in
an ocean of sound, where floated like aisles of light some of
the airs of " Lucia di Lammermoor " and the " Barber of
Seville."- Never did similar bliss overwhelm him with its
waves ; he was lost in a wilderness of sweets ; he was not
himself ; he was relieved from consciousness, that feeling
which always pervades the mind ; and for the first time he
comprehended what might be the state of elementary beings,
of angels, of souls separated from the body. AU his system
seemed infected with the fantastic colouring in which he was
plunged. Sounds, perfume, light, reached him only by
minute rays, in the midst of which he heard mystic currents
whistling along. According to his calculation, this state
lasted about three hundred years, for the sensations were
so numerous and so hurried one upon the other, that a real
appreciation of time was impossible. The paroxysm over,
he was aware that it had only lasted a quarter of an hour.
Another interesting account of the strange hallucinations
produced by the drug is related by Dr. Moreau, who, with two
friends, experimented with hashish.
" At first," he states " I thought my companions were less
influenced by the drug than myself. Then, as the effect, I
fancied that the person who brought me the dose had given
me some of more active quality. This, I thought to myself,
was an imprudence and the involuntary idea presented itself
that I might be poisoned. The idea became fixed ; I called
out loudly to Dr. Roche, ' You are an assassin ; you have
poisoned me ! ' This was received with shouts of laughter,
and my lamentations excited mirth. I struggled for some time
against the thought, but the greater the effort the more com-
pletely did it overcome me, till at last it took full possession
of my mind. The extravagant conviction now came upper-
most that I was dead, and upon the point of being buried ;
my soul had left my body. In a few minutes I had gone
through all the stages of delirium."
These fixed ideas and erroneous convictions are apt to be
252 POISON MYSTERIES
produced, but they only last a few seconds, unless there is
any physical disorder.
" The Orientalist, when he indulges in hashish retires into
the depth of his harem ; no one is then admitted who cannot
contribute to his enjoyment. He surrounds himself with
his dancing girls, who perform their graceful evolutions before
him to the sound of music ; gradually a new condition of the
brain allows a series of illusions, arising from the external
senses, to present themselves. The mind becomes overpow-
ered by the brilliancy of gorgeous visions ; discrimination,
comparison, reason, yield up their throne to dreams and
phantoms which exhilarate and delight.
" The mind tries to understand what is the cause of the
new delight, but it is in vain. It seems to know there is no
reality."
Hardly two people experience the same results from hashish.
Upon some it has little effect, while upon others, especially
women, it exerts extraordinary power. While one person
says he imagined his body endowed with such elasticity that
he fancied he could enter into a bottle and remain there at his
ease, another fancied he had become the piston of a steam
engine ; under the influence of the drug the ear lends itself
more to the illusion than any other sense. Its first effect is
one of intense exhilaration, almost amounting to delirium ;
power of thought is soon lost, and the victim laughs, cries
and sings or dances, all the time imagining he is acting
rationally. The second stage is one of dreamy enjoyment
followed by a dead stupor.
Of the ordinary physical effects of hashish, the first is a
feeling of slight compression of the temporal bones and upper
parts of the head. The respiration is gentle, the pulse is
increased, and a gentle heat is felt all over the surface of the
body. There is a sense of weight about the fore part of the
arms, and an occasional slight involuntary motion, as if to
seek relief from it. There is a feeling of discomfort about the
extremities, creating a feeling of uneasiness, and if the dose
has been too large the usual symptoms of poisoning by Indian
hemp show themselves. Flushes of heat seem to ascend to
the head, even to the brain, which create considerable alarm.
HASHISH AND HASHISH-EATERS 253
Singing in the ears is complained of ; then comes on a state
of anxiety, almost of anguish, with a sense of constriction
about the chest. The individual fancies he hears the beating
of his heart with unaccustomed loudness ; but throughout
the whole period it is the nervous system that is affected,
and in this way the drug differs materially froiTi opium, whose
action on the muscular and digestive systems is most marked.
It is a remarkable fact that Indian hemp fails to produce
the same intoxicating effects in this country that it does
in warmer climates, and whether this is due to the loss
of some volatile principle or difference in temperature it is
not yet determined. But would-be experimentalists in the
effects of hashish would do well to remember that it may not
be indulged in with impunity, and most authorities agree
that the brain becomes eventually disordered with frequent
indulgence in the drug even in India. It further becomes
weakened and incapable of separating the true from the false ;
frequent intoxication leads to a condition of delirium, and
usually of a dangerous nature ; the moral nature becomes
numbed, and the victim at last becomes unfit to pursue his
ordinary avocation. It is stated by those who have had
considerable experience in its use, that even during the dream
of joy there is a consciousness that all is illusion ; there is
at no period a belief that anything that dances before the
senses or plays upon the imagination is real, and that when
the mind recovers its equilibrium it knows that all is but a
phantasm.
CHAPTER XXVI
POISONS IN FICTION
POISON mysteries have ever been a favourite theme with
writers of fiction ; but unfortunately the scientific know-
ledge of novelists is as a rule of a very limited description, and'
the effects attributed by them to certain drugs are often as
fabulous as the romances of olden times. They teU us of
mysterious poisons of untold power, an infinitesimal quantity
of which will cause instantaneous death without leaving a trace
behind. They describe anaesthetics so powerful that a whiff
from a bottle is sufficient to produce immediate insensibility
for any period desired. In fact, novelists have a pharma-
copoeia of their own. After all, why should we question
the effects of the drugs of their imagination, and attempt
to analyse them in the prosaic test tube of modern science ; for
take away the marvels and the mysteries and you kill the
romance. The novel performs its mission if it succeeds in
interesting and amusing us, and the story-teller has accom-
plished the object of his art when he is successful in weaving
the possible with the impossible, so that we can scarce per-
ceive it.
That master of fiction, Dumas, gives us an instance of
this in his ever-fascinating adventures of the Count of Monte
Cristo. Nothing seems impossible to this extraordinary
individual, and incident after incident of the most romantic
nature crowd one upon another throughout the story ; yet
it is all so beautifully blended by the wonderful imagination
of the author that it enthrals us to the end. The Count,
who is supposed to have studied the art of medicine in the
East, has always a remedy at hand for every emergency,
from hashish, in which he is a profound believer, to his mys-
terious stimulating elixir, described as " of the colour of blood,
254
POISONS IN FICTION 255
preserved in a phial of Bohemian glass." A single drop of
this marvellous fluid, if allowed to fall on the lips, will, almost
before it reaches them, restore the marble and inanimate
form to life. His pill-boxes were composed of emeralds and
precious stones of huge size, and their contents consisted of
drugs whose effects were beyond conception. His knowledge
of chemistry and toxicology is equally astonishing, as instanced
in the conversation he holds with Madame de ViUefort, who,
for nefarious purposes, desires to improve her knowledge of
poisons. Monte Cristo discourses on the poisonous proper-
ties of brucine, a drug rarely used in England, but largely
employed in France.
" Suppose," says the Count, " you were to take a mille-
gramme of this poison the first day, two millegrammes the
second day, and so on. Well, at the end of ten days you would
have taken a centigramme : at the end of twenty days,
increasing another millegramme, you would have taken three
hundred centigrammes ; that is to say, a dose you would
support without inconvenience, and which would be very
dangerous for any other person who had not taken the same
precautions as yourself. Well then, at the end of the month,
when drinking water from the same carafe, you would kill the
person who had drunk this water, without your perceiving
otherwise than from slight inconvenience that there was any
poisonous substance mingled with the water."
The Count thus explains the doctrine of immunity from
a poison, by accustoming the system to its effect in small
doses for a length of time, a process which is actually possible
with some drugs, but not with all. His satirical description
of the bungling of the common poisoner, as compared to the
fine subtlety and cunning he advocates, is also worth quoting :
" Amongst us a simpleton, possessed by the demon of hate
or cupidity, who has an enemy to destroy, or some near rela-
tion to dispose of, goes straight to the grocer's or druggist's,
gives a false name, which leads more easily to his detection
than his real one, and purchases, under a pretext that the rats
prevent him from sleeping, five or six pennyworth of arsenic.
If he is really a cunning fellow he goes to five or six different
druggists or grocers, and thereby becomes only five or six
times more easily traced ; then, when he has acquired his
256 POISON MYSTERIES
specific, he administers duly to his enemy or near kinsman a
dose of arsenic which would make a mammoth or mastodon
burst, and which, without rhyme or reason, makes his victim'
utter groans which alarm the whole neighbourhood. Then
arrive a crowd of policemen and constables. They fetch a
doctor, who opens the dead body, and collects from the en-
trails and stomach a quantity of arsenic in a spoon. Next
day a hundred newspapers relate the fact, with the names of
the victim and the murderer. The same evening the grocer or
grocers, druggist or druggists, come and say : ' It was I sold the
arsenic to the gentleman accused,' and rather than not recog-
nize the guilty purchaser, they will recognize twenty. Then
the foolish criminal is taken, imprisoned, interrogated, con-
fronted, confounded, condemned, and cut off by hemp or
steel ; or, if she be a woman of any consideration, they lock
her up for life. This is the way in which you northerners
understand chemistry."
And so he endeavours to incite a woman, who is already
anxiously contemplating a series of terrible crimes.
The recital of the ingenious experiments of the Abbe
Adelmonte is a piece of clever construction, as the quotation
will show.
" The Abbe," said Monte Cristo, " had a remarkably fine
garden full of vegetables, flowers and fruit. From among
these vegetables he selected the most simple — a cabbage,
for instancy. For three days he watered this cabbage with a
distillation of arsenic ; on the third, the cabbage began to
droop and turn yellow. At that moment he cut it. In the
eyes of everybody it seemed fit for table, and preserved its
wholesome appearance. It was only poisoned to the Abbe
Adelmonte. He then took the cabbage to the room where he
had rabbits, for the Abbe Adelmonte had a collection of
rabbits, cats and guinea-pigs, equally fine as his collection of
vegetables, flowers, and fruit. Well, the Abbe Adelmonte
took a rabbit and made it eat a leaf out of the cabbage. The
rabbit died. What magistrate would find or even venture to
insinuate anything against this ? What procureur du roi
has ever ventured to draw up an accusation against M.
Majendie or M. Flourens, in consequence of the rabbits, cats
and guinea-pigs they have killed. Not one. So, then, the
rabbit dies, and justice takes no notice. This rabbit dead,
the Abbe Adelmonte has its entrails taken out by his cook and
POISONS IN FICTION 257
thrown on the dunghill ; on this dunghill was a hen, who,
pecking these intestines, was, in her turn, taken ill, and dies
next day. At the moment when she was struggling in the
convulsions of death, a vulture was flying by (there are a good
many vultures in Adelmonte's country) ; this bird darts on
the dead bird and carries it away to a rock, where it dines off
its prey. Three days afterwards this poor vulture, who has
been very much indisposed since that dinner, feels very giddy
suddenly whilst flying aloft in the clouds, and falls heavily
into a fish-pond. The pike, eels, and carp eat greedily always,
as everybody knows — well, they feast on the vulture. Well,
suppose the next day, one of these eels, or pike, or carp is
served at your table, poisoned as they are to the third genera-
tion. Well then, your guest will be poisoned in the fifth
generation, and die at the end of eight or ten days, of pains
in the intestines, sickness, or abscess of the pylorus. The
doctors open the body, and say, with an air of profound learn-
ing, ' The subject has died of a tumour on the liver, or typhoid
fever.' "
After attempting to kill half the household with brucine,
Madame de Villefort changes her particular poison for a simple
narcotic, recognized by Monte Cristo (who in this instance
frustrates the murder) as being dissolved in alcohol. The
name of the latter poison is not told us by the novelist, but
on the doctor's examination of the suspected liquid we read,
" He took from its silver case a small bottle of nitric acid,
dropped a little of it into the liquor, which immediately
changed to a blood-red colour."
Perhaps the most curious method of poisoning ever used
in fiction is that introduced by James Payn in his novel
called Halves. The poisoner uses finely chopped horsehair
as a medium of getting rid of her niece. In this way she
brings on a disease which puzzles the doctor, until one day
he comes across the would-be murderess pulling the horsehair
out of the drawing-room sofa, which causes him to suspect
her at once. This ingenious lady introduced the chopped
horsehair into the pepper pot used by her victim.
The inimitable Count Fosco, whom Wilkie Collins introduces
into The Woman in White, was supposed to possess a remarkable
knowledge of chemistry, although he says, " Only twice did
I call my science to my aid," in working out his plot to abduct
R
258 POISON MYSTERIES
Lady Glide. His media were simple : "A medicated glass
of water and a medicated bottle of smelling salts relieved her
of all further embarrassment and alarm." This genial villain
waxes eloquent on the science of chemistry in his confession.
" Chemistry," he exclaims, " has always had irresistible
attractions for me from the enormous, the illimitable power
which the knowledge of it confers. Chemists — I assert it
emphatically^ — might sway, if they pleased, the destinies of
humanity. Mind, they say, rules the world. But what
rules the mind ? The body (follow me closely here) lies at
the mercy of the most omnipotent of all potentates — the
chemist. Give me — Fosco- — chemistry ; and when Shake-
speare has conceived Hamlet, and sits down to execute the
conception- — with a few grains of powder dropped into his
daily food, I will reduce his mind, by the actions of his body,
till his pen pours out the most abject drivel that has ever
degraded paper. Under similar circumstances revive me the
illustrious Newton. I guarantee that when he sees the apple
fall he shall eat it, instead of discovering the principle of
gravitation. Nero's dinner shall transform Nero into the
mildest of men before he has done digesting it, and the morning
draught of Alexander the Great shall make Alexander run
for his life at the first sight of the enemy the same after-
noon. On my sacred word of honour it is lucky for society
that modern chemists are, by incomprehensible good fortune,
the most harmless of mankind. The mass are worthy fathers
of families, who keep shops. The few are philosophers besotted
with admiration for the sound of their own lecturing voices,
visionaries who waste their lives on fantastic impossibilities,
or quacks whose ambition soars no higher than our corns."
In Armadale the same novelist introduces us to a poisoner
of the deepest dye in the person of Miss Gwilt. This fair
damsel, whose auburn locks seemed to have possessed an
irresistible attraction for the opposite sex, was addicted to
taking laudanum to soothe her troubled nerves, and first
tried to mix a dose with some lemonade she had prepared
for her husband's namesake and friend, whom she wished out
of the way. This attempt failing, and a second one, to scuttle
a yacht in which he was sailing, proving futile also, he was
finally lured to a sanatorium in London where she had arranged
POISONS IN FICTION 259
for him to be placed in a room into which a poisonous gas
(presumably carbonic acid) was to be passed. At the last
moment she discovers her husband has taken the place of
her victim, and in revulsion of feeling she rescues him, and
ends her own life instead in the poisoned chamber. According
to the story, the medical investigation which followed the
tragedy ended in discovering that she had died of apoplexy ;
a fact which, had it occurred in real life, would not have
redounded to the credit of the medical men who conducted it.
The heroine of Benson's novel. The Rtihicon, poisons herself
with prussic acid of unheard-of strength, which she discovers
among some photographic chemicals.
Miss Helen Mathers, in one of her novels, The Sin of
Hagar, a story warranted to thrill the soul of " Sweet Seven-
teen," makes some extraordinary discoveries which will be
new to chemists. For instance, she tells us of strychnine
that actually discolours a glass of whisky and water. One
of the characters, a frisky old dowager, professes to be an
amateur chemist, and this lady, we are gravely informed by
the novelist, " detects the presence of the strychnine in the
glass of whisky and water at a glance."
But Miss Mathers has still another poison, whose properties
will doubtless be a revelation to scientists, and it is with this
marvellous body the " double-dyed villainess " of the story
puts an end to her woes. For convenience she carries it
about with her concealed in a ring, and when at last she
decides on committing suicide, we are told " she simply
placed the ring to her lips, a strange odour spread through
the room, and she instantly lay dead."
Even the experienced writer of sensational fiction may
often go beyond the point of probability into impossibility
when describing the use of poisons. In a story recently
published, a well-known novelist describes a burglar who is
caught by a policeman slipping out of a house in the night.
A terrible struggle ensues, with the result that they rolled
struggling into the gutter, the policeman shouting for assis-
tance. The burglar's right hand flies to his jacket pocket,
then swiftly to the face of his captor who almost instantly
relaxes his hold and becomes unconscious. It is revealed
afterwards that the prisoner had smashed in his fingers a
26o POISON MYSTERIES
small capsule which released an asphyxiating gas ; this
must indeed have been of great potency to be enclosed
in a capsule to be held between the fingers and render an
individual insensible in a few seconds. The effect of the gas,
too, must have been terrible, as we are told that the constable
remained asleep in the front garden till eight o'clock in the
morning. The nearest policeman was unable to move him,
but he had to be removed in an ambulance and when
brought to the station was thought to be intoxicated until
the divisional sergeant pronounced that he had been gassed.
Certainly, the novelist has exceeded the scientist in pro-
ducing a gas that would have proved invaluable during the
Great War.
A final instance of the poison of fiction may be quoted
from a recently published novel in which the heroine, a houri
of the East, is abducted by a fierce renegade Englishman and
carried off into the desert.
She escapes from him, however, by the aid of a wonderful
ring she wears, described by the novelist as " a great hollow
jewel of ancient gold set with a green diamond." It contained,
we are told, " a poisonous drug of which two or three grains
in coffee finished off the lady's abductor and drugged fifty
others, and so she escaped."
On the stage, " poisoning " has gone somewhat out of
fashion with modern dramatists, although it was a common
thing in years gone by for the villain of the play to swallow
a cup of cold poison in the last act, and after several dying
speeches to fall suddenly flat on his back and die to slow
music. The death of Cleopatra, described by Shakespeare
as resulting from the bite of a venomous snake, is like no
clinical description of the final effects of death from the bite
of any known snake.
Beverley, in " The Gamester," takes a dose of strong
poison in the fifth act, and afterwards makes several fairly
long speeches before he apparently feels the effects, and finally
succumbs. The description of the death of Juliet, which
Shakespeare, in all probability, conceived from reading the
effects that followed the drinking of morion or mandragora
wine, is an accurate description of death from that drug.
The use of this anodyne preparation to deaden pain dates
POISONS IN FICTION 261
from ancient times, and it is stated it was a common practice
for women to administer it to those about to suffer the penalty
of the law by being crucified. We have another instance of
the fabulous effects ascribed to poisons by the early play-
wrights, in Massinger's play, " The Duke of Milan." Francisco
dusts over a plant some poisonous powder and hands it to
Eugenia. Ludovico approaches, and kisses the lady's hand
but twice, and then dies from the effects of the poison.
Sufficient eccentricities of this kind in fiction might be
enumerated to fill a volume, but we must forbear. It is
perhaps hardly necessary to state that the lady novelist is the
greatest sinner in this respect, and that stranger poisons are
evolved from her fertile brain than were ever known to man.
PART II
POISON MYSTERIES
CHAPTER I
THE MYSTERY OF LAWFORD HALL— THE
STRANGE CASE OF ELIZABETH FENNING
IN the spring of the year 1780, the quiet hamlet of Little
Lawford in Warwickshire, situated about three miles
from Rugby, was the scene of a tragedy which aroused great
interest not only in the immediate locality, but throughout
the country.
At that time there lived at Lawford Hall Sir Theodosius
Boughton, a young baronet who had not yet attained his
majority, together with his mother, his only sister and her
husband, Captain Donellan, a half-pay officer.
The career of the latter gentleman, who plays an important
part in the story, had been an eventful one. In 1757 he was
gazetted as a subaltern in the 39th Regiment, then stationed
in Madras on foreign service. There he entered the East
India Company's service and joined in an expedition against
Masulipatam in 1758, and was wounded in action after the
taking of that place. Trouble, however, arose over the ques-
tion of certain loot that had been taken from the merchants ;
Donellan was court-martialled, sentenced to be discharged
from the service, and returned to England.
On his return his ambition was to shine as a beau in society.
Dress and gaming are said to have occupied his whole atten-
tion, and he eventually became Master of the Ceremonies at the
Pantheon, in Oxford Street, London, then a fashionable resort
for dancing much frequented by Society.
Here, it is probable, he met and wooed Miss Boughton,
whom he married, and a year after the couple came to live at
Lawford Hall with Lady Boughton. At this time young Sir
Theodosius was finishing his education. After leaving Eton
he had lived for a couple of years with a tutor, and then came
home to Lawford to settle down with his family.
265
266 POISON MYSTERIES
He was a young fellow of high spirits and fond of outdoor
sports, but like other young men of his class at that time he
was inclined to live a fast life, and this had told more or less
upon his health.
From the time of his residence at home, for some reason
or other, he did not get on well with his brother-in-law.
Captain Donellan, and the latter appears to have adopted a
patronizing attitude towards the young man while living in
his house. According to his father's will Sir Theodosius did
not come into his property, which was worth about £2,000 a
year, until he was twenty-one, and meanwhile he was under
the guardianship of Sir Edmund Wheeler, an old friend who
lived eight miles away from Lawford. According to the will,
should he die before attaining his majority, his sister, Mrs.
DoneUan, was to benefit largely from the estate.
Matters had gone thus for nearly two years when Sir Theo-
dosius, as the result of his former gay life, became unwell and
placed himself under the care of an apothecary in Rugby.
Donellan, who became aware of this, talked a good deal to
various friends, remarking that the young man was ruining
his health, that his life was not worth a year's purchase, and
that he could not possibly live if he did not take more care.
The young baronet, however, appeared in good health and
spirits, but. the conditions of life became so unpleasant at the
Hall that he at length decided to go and stay with a friend
in Northampton until he came of age.
About five o'clock on a Tuesday afternoon, August 29, 1780,
Sir Theodosius, accompanied by several of his menservants,
set off down to the river on a fishing expedition. During his
absence a dose of medicine in the form of a draught was
delivered at the Hall from Mr. Powell, the apothecary, which
was to be taken by the young man the first thing on the
following morning. The bottle was taken upstairs and
placed on a shelf in his bedroom. Soon after Sir Theodosius
had set out, his mother, Lady Boughton, and Mrs. Donellan
went into the grounds to take the air and remained in the
garden some hours. About seven o'clock they were joined
in their walk by Captain Donellan, who remarked that he had
been fishing with Sir Theodosius, and that he was afraid if
he stayed out so long in the damp he would take cold. Sir
THE MYSTERY DF LAWFORD HALL 267
Theodosius, however, returned home all right, somewhat
later and, after having supper, retired to bed.
At six in the morning a servant called him, and he got out
of bed and spoke to him. An hour later his mother went into
his bedroom to remind him about taking his medicine. He
asked her to give it to him, and she, taking it from the shelf,
poured the contents into a cup and gave it to him. He
swallowed about half and complained that it tasted so nause-
ous he would be unable to retain it. He ,handed the cup
back to his mother who smelt it and was struck with the
powerful smell of bitter almonds, but gave it back to him
again. Sir Theodosius then swallowed the remainder and
lay down, but in a few minutes he was taken very ill with
vomiting. On his becoming more composed Lady Boughton
left him for about ten minutes, thinking he would sleep. On
returning to his room she found him collapsed and foaming at
the mouth. Struck with alarm at his condition she sent a
servant for the apothecary and to call Captain Donellan.
The latter came in a few minutes, and on his entering the room
Lady Boughton exclaimed : " Here is a terrible affair, I have
given my son something that was wrong instead of what the
apothecary sent. I am sure it would have killed a dog."
Donellan replied, " Why the devil did Mr. Powell send such a
medicine ? Where is the bottle ? " Lady Boughton pointed
to it on the mantelpiece and Donellan at once took it up,
poured some water into it, shook and rinsed it and emptied
the contents into a basin of dirty water standing near.
Astonished at his action Lady Boughton said, " Good
God, what are you doing ? Let everything remain just in
the same place until Mr. Powell the apothecary arrives."
Donellan made no reply, but took an empty phial which had
contained a previous draught which was also standing on
the same shelf and rinsed that out in the same way, then,
calling a servant, ordered her to take the basin away, in spite
of Lady Boughton's remonstrance.
Meanwhile Sir Theodosius lay dying, and expired in about
thirty minutes.
Some time elapsed before Mr. Powell arrived, and he was
taken up to the room by Donellan, who explained to him that
Sir Theodosius had been out late fishing the previous night.
268 POISON MYSTERIES
and had no doubt taken cold, which had caused his death.
He made no mention of the effect of the draught, but told
him the young man had died in convulsions. The apothecary
apparently offered no solution as to the cause of death and
left the house.
The same morning that Sir Theodosius died Donellan wrote
to Sir William Wheeler, his guardian, informing him of his
death, and stating that he had been under the care of Mr.
Powell, of Rugby, for a similar complaint to that which he had
had at Eton. Within a day or two, however, rumours of
foul play became current and Sir WiUiam Wheeler communi-
cated these to Donellan and insisted that to allay public
suspicion a post-mortem examination should be made. He
named a Dr. Rattray and two surgeons, Messrs. Wilmer
and Snow, whom he desired to conduct the examination.
These gentlemen were accordingly sent for and arrived at
Lawford Hall on Monday evening, September 4. They were
received by Captain Donellan, who, after some conversation,
showed them to the room. The body of the unfortunate
young man being in an advanced state of decomposition, the
doctors showed reluctance to proceed with the autopsy, and
after a cursory examination they left the Hall without coming
to any satisfactory conclusion, nothing having been said to
them by DoneUan of any suspicion of foul play.
DoneUan then wrote to Sir William Wheeler stating that
the doctors had fully satisfied the family, but Sir William
was still dissatisfied, and on hearing that no actual post-
mortem had been made, insisted that two other surgeons,
viz. Messrs. Bucknell and Snow, should examine the remains.
On their arrival, however, DoneUan again circumvented their
intentions and the body was duly interred. This increased
the rumours instead of dispelling them, and eventually the
coroner of the district was informed of the case and he decided
to hold an inquiry.
The inquest lasted three days, and on the last day Donellan
addressed a letter to the coroner in which he stated that Sir
Theodosius used to procure arsenic to kiU rats, and frequently
bought as much as a pound at a time, also that he used to
make large quantities of Goulard Water.
This was to account for the suspicion of poisoning which
THE MYSTERY OF LAWFORD HALL 269
was now rife. After hearing the evidence the coroner ordered
that the body should be exhumed. On Saturday morning,
September 9, the body was removed from the vault and placed
in the churchyard. About five hundred people had collected
to witness the gruesome sight, which in those days was con-
ducted in public. When all was ready a Mr. Bucknill, a
young surgeon, put on a wagoner's smock frock that had
been dipped in vinegar, and with a napkin that had been
soaked in vinegar tied over his mouth and nose, opened the
body, which was duly inspected by the doctors present and re-
interred.
As a result of the inquest Captain Donellan was arrested and
charged with the wilful murder of his brother-in-law by poison-
ing him with arsenic.
The trial, which excited intense interest throughout the
country on account of the social position of the persons
involved, took place at the Warwick Assizes on March 30,
1781, before Mr. Justice Buller.
Six counsel, headed by Mr. Howarth, appeared for the
Crown, and the prisoner was represented by Mr. Newnham
and two juniors. The case mainly depended on the medical
evidence, a review of which forms an interesting picture of the
state of medicine and toxicology of the time.
The first witness was Mr. Powell, the apothecary, of Rugby,
who was treating Sir Theodosius at the time of his death.
He swore that the draught he sent the baronet was quite
harmless and consisted of rhubarb and jalap, spirit of laven-
der, nutmeg water and simple syrup.
Dr. Rattray, of Coventry, the next medical witness, described
the visit he paid to Lawford Hall at the wish of Sir William
Wheeler with the other surgeons. The reason they did not
proceed with the post-mortem, he stated, was that they
thought it too late, and that so long after death nothing could
be discovered. He was present when the body was opened in
the churchyard, and from its appearance he was now of the
opinion that poison was the cause of death.
Mr. Wilmer, a surgeon, described some experiments he had
made with laurel water. He gave an ounce to a young grey-
hound and to his great surprise it died immediately. He
next gave a pint and a half to a mare and in a few moments
^70 POISON MYSTERIES
she went into convulsions and died in fifteen minutes. He
believed that an ounce of laurel water was enough to kill a
strong man. Dr. Ash, a physician of Birmingham, next gave
his opinion that the young man had died from the effects of
poison.
Further medical evidence was given by Dr. Parsons, Pro-
fessor of Anatomy at Oxford University. He stated he
believed that Sir Theodosius had been poisoned by laurel
water which had been given to him instead of the purgative
draught.
Important evidence was given by a female servant named
Mary Lines, who stated that Captain Donellan had a still, which
he kept in his own room and which he used for distilling rose
water.
A gardener at the Hall, named Amos, who was next called,
said Captain Donellan brought the still to him two or three
days after Sir Theodosius died. It was full of wet lime at
the time and he asked him to clean it for him. He mentioned
that the lime was used for killing fleas.
For the defence Mr. John Hunter, the famous surgeon, of
London, was caUed to give evidence and said he had dissected
some thousands of subjects. The symptoms he had heard
described were not conclusive that the baronet had taken
poison. He had never known in his practice of laurel water
being given to a human being. From the description he had
heard of the appearance of the body, he should not have drawn
the inference that death had resulted from poison. Apoplexy
or epilepsy would produce similar symptoms to those he had
heard described, but he would not swear that the deceased
man died a natural death.
The judge in summing up commented on the doubt Mr.
Hunter seemed to have in giving evidence, and the failure of
counsel to get from him a conclusive opinion. On the other
hand five medical men were agreed that death had been due
to the draught, and that the draught had been laurel water.
How did the poison get into the medicine bottle ? Why also
did the prisoner rinse out the empty bottles and see they were
taken away and destroyed in the face of the suspicious circum-
sfances attending the death ? The evidence concerning the
still was also important, as it proved the prisoner had a know-
THE MYSTERY OF LAWFORD HALL 271
ledge of its use and he often used it for distilling rose and
lavender waters. The deceptive way in which the prisoner
had acted was also likely to arouse suspicions as well as his
endeavour to prevent an examination of the body.
The jury after a few minutes' consideration found the
prisoner " Guilty," and the judge pronounced sentence of
death. The prisoner's body afterwards to be delivered to the
surgeons and be dissected and anatomized. " The prisoner,"
says a contemporary writer, " neatly dressed in black, was
driven in a coach to the gallows and was hanged."
Thus ended the brilliant Captain Donellan, the much envied
beau of London Society in George the Third's time.
A strange case that happened early in the nineteenth century
was that of Elizabeth Fenning.
On April 11, 1815, this girl, who was engaged as cook to
a law stationer in Chancery Lane, was tried at the Old Bailey
before the Recorder on a charge of having poisoned her em-
ployer, Mr. Olebar Turner, his wife and his father, Robert
Gregson Turner. The girl, who was only twenty years of
age, had been employed as cook in Mr. Turner's house for six
weeks, and on March 21 had made some yeast dumplings for
dinner.
The dumplings were brought to the table and partaken
of by the three persons. A few minutes after eating a
portion of one, Mrs. Turner was taken ill with violent pains
and vomiting, and shortly afterwards the two men, who had
also eaten of the dumplings, were seized with pains in the same
manner. Mr. Marshall, a surgeon, was sent for several hours
afterwards, and all three persons, after some time, recovered.
The girl herself and a young apprentice in the house had also
eaten of the dumplings and were affected in the same way.
Mr. Turner said he suspected arsenic had been put in the
food and made a search next morning. In the kitchen he
found a brown dish in which the dumplings had been mixed,
with what appeared to be some remnants of the food still
adhering to it. He put some water into the dish and stirred
it, and found in a few minutes a white powder or sediment fell
to the bottom, which he kept and handed to the surgeon.
He knew that arsenic was kept in a drawer in his office in
272 POISON MYSTERIES
two wrappers labelled " Arsenick, Deadly Poison " and was
used for killing mice. The drawer was always unlocked.
He had last seen the packet of arsenic in the drawer on March
7, and it was now missing. He had noticed that the knives
they had used to cut the dumplings had turned black.
He had charged the girl with putting something in the
dumplings, and she had replied it was not in the dumplings
but in the milk that was used to make them which had
been brought to her by Sarah Peer, a fellow-servant. Mr.
John Marshall, the surgeon who was called in, said he found
the family suffering from symptoms that would be produced
by arsenic, and the prisoner was also ill in the same way. He
had examined the remnants found in the dish by Mr. Turner
and washed them with a tea-kettle of warm water and then
decanted it. He found half a teaspoonful of white powder
left. After washing it a second time he found it was arsenic.
Arsenic would turn the knives black. He had examined the
remains of the yeast used and the flour employed in making
the dumplings, but found no trace of arsenic.
The girl, in her defence, swore she was quite innocent of the
whole charge.
The jury found her guilty and she was sentenced to death.
The result of the trial excited public interest in London, and
caused an outburst of popular feeling, the general opinion
being that the evidence was insufficient to prove the girl
guilty. The Prince Regent was petitioned, also the Lord
Chancellor and the Secretary of State, and several meetings
of influential persons were held, agitating for a remission of
the sentence. The girl, however, was executed at Newgate on
July 26, 1815, exclaiming, " I die innocent, but God will con-
vince you by a circumstance this day." In 1834 the man
Turner died in the workhouse, but confessed before his death
that he had put the arsenic into the dumplings and falsely
sworn away the girl's life.
CHAPTER II
THE CASE OF MADAME LAFARGE
THE story of Madame Lafarge, who was tried in France
for the murder of her husband in 1840, is a strange and
romantic one.
Marie Fortunee CappeUe was the daughter of a captain in
the Imperial Artillery. Her parents died during her child-
hood, and she was placed in the care of an aunt, who, at the
earliest opportunity, determined to relieve herself of the
burden of her support by negotiating a marriage for her.
While still a girl, through the instrumentality of a matrimonial
agent in Paris, an alliance was arranged between Marie
CappeUe and one Monsieur Charles Lafarge, who was a widower
and an ironmaster of Glandier.
The marriage, which was purely a commercial transaction,
took place in Paris on August 15, 1839, after which Lafarge
and his young wife set out for his old and gloomy seigneurial
chateau at Glandier.
From statements made afterwards, Madame Lafarge became
disgusted with her husband's brutality before the honeymoon
was over. After they reached their own house, however, they
were reconciled, and there seemed to be every possibility of
their spending a happy wedded life together.
Besides the newly married pair, there lived in the chateau
the mother and sister of Lafarge. His chief clerk, Denis
Barbier, was a frequent visitor there, and was apparently
at liberty to walk through the place without restriction.
In a very short time Madame Lafarge discovered that both
she and her relatives had been deceived as to the position of
her husband, and that instead of being a man of considerable
fortune, he was straitened for means. On his representations
273 s
274 POISON MYSTERIES
she bestowed upon him all her fortune, and even wrote letters
at his dictation to some of her wealthy friends, asking them to
aid him to find money to develop a new method he claimed
to have discovered for smelting iron. With these letters of
introduction, Lafarge set out for Paris in December, 1839, to
raise money to start his new project.
While he was away, his wife had her portrait drawn by an
artist in Glandier, and determined to send it to her absent
husband. She therefore packed it in a box, with some cakes
made by his mother, together with an affectionate letter, and
despatched them to Paris. This box, which contained
nothing but the five small cakes, the portrait, and the letter,
was packed and sealed by Madame Lafarge in the presence of
several witnesses.
When it reached Paris and was opened by Lafarge, it con-
tained only one large cake, after partaking of which he was
suddenly taken ill, and was eventually compelled to return
home, where he arrived on January 5, 1840. His sickness
continued and increased in severity, and nine days afterwards
he died.
Shortly after his death his mother and friends, who were
well aware how the widow disliked them and also her husband,
who had made her life so unhappy, at once imputed the cause
of death to poison administered by his wife in the cake she
had sent to Paris, and Marie Cappelle Lafarge was arrested
on suspicion.
When the house of the deceased man was searched, certain
diamonds were found which were supposed to have been
stolen from the Vicomtesse de Leotaud by Madame Lafarge
before her marriage.
The unfortunate woman was therefore charged with the
double crime of theft and murder.
Though arrested in January, 1840, the trial of Madame
Lafarge did not commence till July 9 of the same year, and
the charge of theft was first proceeded with in her absence,
and she was found guilty.
While this judgment was still under appeal, she was brought
to trial on the graver charge.
The evidence for the prosecution went to prove that the
illness of Lafarge commenced with the eating of the cake
THE CASE OF MADAME LAFARGE 275
received from his home. As already stated, when the box
arrived in Paris the seals had been broken, the five cakes
had disappeared, and a single cake " as large as a plate " had
been substituted for them. It was alleged by the prosecution
that this single cake had been prepared by Madame Lafarge,
and secretly placed in the box ; but no evidence could be
brought to prove that she ever tampered with the box after it
had been sealed. Lafarge's clerk, Denis Barbier, made a
clandestine visit to Paris after the box had been despatched,
and he was with Lafarge when it arrived in Paris, yet no
notice seems to have been taken of this suspicious fact. It
transpired, it was he who first threw out hints on his master's
return that he was being poisoned by arsenic, and told a
brother employe that his master would be dead within ten
days. There was ample proof, however, that there was a
considerable quantity of arsenic in the house at Glandier. It
was found that Madame Lafarge had purchased some in
December, stating she required it for destroying rats ; Barbier
also stated in evidence that Madame had requested him to
procure her some arsenic. He bought some, but did not give
it to her. It was further stated that Madame Lafarge was
seen to stir a white powder into some chicken broth which
had been prepared for her husband, the remains of which,
found in a bowl, were said by the analyst to contain arsenic.
The medical men who conducted the post-mortem examin-
ation gave it as their deliberate opinion that the deceased man
had been poisoned by arsenic, of which poison they professed
to have found considerable quantities. The friends of the
accused then submitted the matter to Orfila, the famous
French toxicologist, who, on giving his opinion of the methods
and manner in which the analysis had been carried out, said
that owing to the antiquated and doubtful methods of detec-
tion employed by the medical men, it was probable they
fancied they had found arsenic where there was none. There-
upon the prosecution asked Orfila to undertake a fresh analysis
himself, which he consented to do, and, on making a careful
examination of the remains, stated he discovered just a minute
trace of arsenic.
This apparently sealed the doom of the accused woman, and
served to strengthen the bias of the jury.
276 POISON MYSTERIES
But now another actor appeared in the drama in the person
of Raspail, another distinguished French chemist, who had
from the beginning had watched the case with interest.
On September 17, 1840, a young barrister knocked at the
door of Raspail's apartment in Paris at eleven o'clock at
night. Exhausted by thirty-six hours in a post chaise — for he
had come straight from Tulle where the trial of Madame
Lafarge was being held — ^he handed the following note to the
chemist —
" I am innocent and most unlucky. I am suffering and
make appeal to your science and your heart . . . M. Orfila
has arrived and I have refallen into the abyss. My hope,
Monsieur, is in you. Lend the aid of your knowledge to an
unfortunate victim of calumny. Come and save me while all
others abandon me. — Marie Lafarge."
The writer was an utter stranger to Raspail at this time,
but though he had reached the age of forty-six years and was
in indifferent health, he decided to sacrifice his night's rest
and at 2 a.m. was posting as hard as horses could carry him
on the southern high road to the scene of the trial. When he
arrived at Limoges he was in a high state of fever and took a
room to rest for an hour. The rumour reached him there
that Madame Lafarge had been acquitted, so he remained the
night and the next day posted on another fifty miles and
arrived at Tulle just an hour too late. Madame Lafarge had
been found guilty and condemned to penal servitude for life.
It was then that Raspail wrote to the presiding judge the
words so often quoted : " Give me anything you like — your
own armchair — and I will find arsenic in it."
Raspail has left a long description of his interview with
Madame Lafarge whom he then saw. After asking to be
allowed to examine the three plates with arsenical deposits
that had passed through Orfila's hands, he asked to be
allowed to test the reagents left at Tulle by Orfila. The reply
was made that " M. Orfila left all his reagents with M. Bories,
a pharmacist, except his potash, his zinc, and the nitrate of
potash by means of which he obtained the deposit on the
third plate."
"Supposing," continues Raspail, " I had acted like Orfila
THE CASE OF MADAME LAFARGE 277
(as he did on another occasion) , applying the pretty expression
of ' ignorant crowd ' to the host of reagents obtained from
local pharmacists and bringing from Paris a nitrate of potash
capable of revealing a poison where no other reagent could
find an atom, what would the Advocate-General have said ?
Would he not at once have required that the phial of nitrate
from Paris should be examined by the experts present ? "
Raspail then took the zinc wire with which Otfila had
experimented to the shop where the toxicologist had procured
the article, and he found on analysis that the zinc itself con-
tained more arsenic than Orfila had detected by his examina-
tion. Orfila had used Marsh's test, which is infallible so long
as the reagents used are free from arsenic themselves.
As already related, Raspail reached Tulle too late to give
evidence at the trial, and the unhappy Marie Cappelle Lafarge,
after a trial lasting sixteen days, had been found guilty and
condemned to imprisonment for life with hard labour, and
exposure in the pillory. Raspail, however, would not let the
matter rest, and at once set to work to save the condemned
woman. He informed Orfila that the zinc he had used was
already contaminated with arsenic, and at length got him
fairly to admit his error and join with him in a professional
report to the authorities to that effect.
After being imprisoned for twelve years, in the end, the
sentence on Madame Lafarge was reduced to five years in the
Montpellier house of detention, after which the Government
sent her to the Convent of St. Remy, from whence she was
liberated in 1852, but only to end her wretched life a few
months afterwards.
There appeared in the Edinburgh Review for 1842 a careful
examination of this interesting case from a legal point of view,
in which the writer states that the strongest evidence indicated
Denis Barbier and not Madame Lafarge as the perpetrator of
the crime. It was proved that this man lived by forgery, and
assisted Lafarge in some very shady transactions to cover the
latter's insolvency. He was further known to harbour a deadly
hatred for Madame Lafarge. He was with his master in Paris
when he was seized with the sudden illness, and it transpired
that out of the 25,000 francs the ironmaster had succeeded in
borrowing from his wife's relatives, only 3,900 could be found
278 POISON MYSTERIES
when he returned to Glandier. On his own statement he was
in the possession of a quantity of arsenic, and he was the first
to direct suspicion against his master's wife. Yet all these
facts appear to have been overlooked in the efforts of the
prosecution to fasten the guilt on the unfortunate woman.
That Lafarge died from the effects of arsenical poisoning
there seems little doubt, but by whom administered has never
been conclusively proved, and the tragedy remains among
the poison mysteries still unsolved.
CHAPTER III
THE CASE OF MADELINE SMITH
THE case of Madeline Smith, who was charged with
causing the death of L'Angerlier by the administration
of arsenic at Glasgow in 1857, excited universal interest
at the time. Owing to the social position of the lady, the trial
was a cause celebre, and the circumstances of the case were
of an extraordinary character.
Miss Smith, who was a young and accomplished woman, and
who resided in a fashionable quarter of Glasgow, got entangled
with a French clerk named Pierre Emile L' Angelier. L'Angelier
died very suddenly in an unaccountable manner, and suspicion
falling on Madeline Smith, who was frequently in his com-
pany, she was arrested and charged with the crime. The Crown
case was, that she poisoned her lover so that she might be be-
trothed to a personage of high social standing. That L' Angelier
died on March 23 from the effects of arsenic was amply proved,
but while suspicious acts were alleged against the accused
woman, no direct evidence was adduced to show that she admin-
istered the drug. The worst point against her was the fact of
her having possession of the poison ; and irrespective of two
previous purchases of coloured arsenic, for which she had given
false reasons, it was proved that the accused had purchased
one ounce, as she said " to kill rats," on March 18, only five
days before the death of L'Angerlier. The arsenic sold was
coloured with indigo, according to the regulations. When
charged with the crime, and required to account for the poison,
she replied that she had used the whole of it to apply to her
face, arms, and neck, diluted with water, and that a school
companion had told her that arsenic was good for the com-
plexion. From the post-mortem examination and subsequent
analysis eighty-eight grains of arsenic were found in the stomach
279
28o POISON MYSTERIES
and its contents. Dr. Christison, the greatest toxicological
expert of the time, was called, and stated he knew of no case
in which so much as eighty-eight grains of arsenic had been
found in the stomach after death.
This was made a turning point of the defence, and it was
contended that so large a dose of arsenic could not have been
swallowed unknowingly, and, therefore, suicide was indicated.
The jury accepting this view of the case, returned a verdict of
" not proven," and Madeline Smith was liberated, the trial
having lasted ten days.
Some interesting particulars concerning the subsequent life
of this lady were published some time ago. After the trial she
decided to go abroad ; but before starting she is said to have
married a certain mysterious individual named Dr. Tudor
Hora. With him she lived for many years in Perth, but few
people ever saw her, and the doctor always declined to divulge
his wife's maiden name. He kept a small surgery, and is said
to have been in receipt of about ;f400 a year from an unnamed
source. Some years after, believing that his wife had been
recognized, he bought a practice at Hotham, near Melbourne,
and they sailed for Australia. Shortly after their arrival,
Mrs. Hora left her husband and remained absent from Mel-
bourne until his death. Soon afterwards she married again, but
it is said her second marriage was not by any means a happy
one. She remained unknown, and sought no society. She
was an excellent musician, and spent most of her time reading
and playing. She had no children, and died at the age of
fifty- five.
Six years after the trial of Madeline Smith a case was tried
at the Chester Assizes, in which a woman named Hewitt or
Holt was charged with poisoning her mother. Although the
symptoms of irritant poisoning were very clearly marked,
the country practitioner who attended the woman at the
time certified that the cause of her death was due to gastro-
enteritis. Eleven weeks after she had been buried, the body
was exhumed and examined. An analysis revealed the pres-
ence of one hvmdred and fifty-four grains of arsenic in the
stomach alone. The possession of a considerable quantity
of arsenic was brought home to the accused, and also direct
evidence of its administration, and she was found guilty. This
THE CASE OF MADELINE SMITH 281
case is interesting from the fact of proof being obtained of
the administration of so large a dose of arsenic, and if it had
occurred before the trial of Madeline Smith it might have
demolished her counsel's main line of defence.
CHAPTER IV
THE BRAVO MYSTERY
ANTIMONY has been a frequent medium with criminal
poisoners, including Dove, Smethurst, Pritchard and
others, but there is probably no trial in which antimony
has figured that caused more interest than the " Bravo
Mystery " of 1876.
The story of this case begins with the marriage of Mr. Bravo,
a young barrister of about thirty years of age, to Mrs. Ricardo,
who was then a wealthy widow and a lady of considerable
personal attractions. After the marriage, which followed a
very short acquaintance, the couple went to reside at Balham.
According to a statement made by Mrs. Bravo, she informed
her husband before the marriage of a former lover, and there
is little doubt that it rankled in Mr. Bravo's mind, and he
frequently taunted his wife with the fact. He was a strong,
healthy, and teniperate man, but appears to have been both
weak and vain in character. On Tuesday, April 18, 1876,
after breakfast at his own house at Balham, he drove with his
wife into town. On their way, a very unpleasant discussion
took place. Arriving in town he had a Turkish bath, lunched
with a relative of his wife's at St. James's Restaurant, and
walked on his way home to Victoria Station with a friend and
fellow-barrister, whom he asked out for the following day.
He arrived home about half-past four. Shortly after his
return, Mr. Bravo went out for a ride, in the course of which
his horse bolted and carried him a long distance, and he got
back to his home very tired and exhausted. At half-past six
he was noticed leaning forward on his chair, looking ill, and
with his head hanging down. He ordered a hot bath, and
when getting into it he cried out aloud with pain, putting his
hand to his side. The bath did not appear to relieve him
282
THE BRAVO MYSTERY 283
much, and he seemed to be suffering pain all through dinner,
but appeared to avoid attracting the attention of his wife and
Mrs. Cox, her companion, who dined with him.
The food provided during the dinner was partaken of more
or less in common by all three, but this was not the case as
regards the wine. Mr. Bravo drank Burgundy only, while
Mrs. Bravo and Mrs. Cox drank sherry and Marsala. The
wine drunk by Mr. Bravo had been decanted by the butler
some time before dinner ; how long he could not say, but he
noticed nothing unusual with it,.
The wine was of good quality, and Mr. Bravo, who was
something of a connoisseur, remarked nothing peculiar in
its taste, but drank it as usual. If he had Burgundy for
luncheon he finished the bottle at dinner ; but if not, as on
the day in question, the remains of the bottle were put away
in an unlocked cellaret in the dining-room. The butler could
not remember whether any Burgundy was left on this day or
not ; but, however, none was discovered.
This cellaret was opened at least twice subsequently to this,
and prior to Mr. Bravo's illness, once by Mrs. Cox and once
by the maid.
Mr. Bravo seems to have eaten a good dinner, although
he was evidently not himself from some cause or other. It
was said he was suffering from toothache or neuralgia, and
had just received a letter that had given him some annoyance.
The dinner lasted till past eight o'clock, after which the
party adjourned to the morning-room where conversation
continued up to about nine o'clock.
Mrs. Bravo and Mrs. Cox then retired upstairs, leaving Mr.
Bravo alone, until Mrs. Cox went to fetch Mrs. Bravo some wine
and water from the dining-room.
Mrs. Bravo remained in her room and prepared for bed and
drank the wine and water brought to her by Mrs. Cox, who
remained with her.
The housemaid, on taking some hot water to the ladies'
room as was her usual custom at half-past nine, was asked by
Mrs. Bravo to bring her some more Marsala in the glass that
had contained the wine and water. On her way downstairs
to the dining-room, the girl met her master at the foot of the
stairs. He looked " queer " and very strange in the face, but
284 POISON MYSTERIES
did not appear to be in pain, according to her statement. He
looked twice at her, yet did not speak, though it was his
custom, but passed on.
Mr. Bravo was alone after the departure of his wife and
Mrs. Cox until the time when he passed the housemaid at
the foot of the stairs. He entered his wife's dressing-room,
and the maid Mrs. Bravo's bedroom. In the dressing-room,
according to Mrs. Cox's statement, Mr. Bravo spoke to his
wife in French, with reference to the wine. This had frequently
been the subject of unpleasant remarks before ; but Mrs.
Bravo had no recollection of the conversation on this occasion.
After leaving his wife in her room, Mr. Bravo went to his
own bedroom and closed the door. The maid left Mrs.
Bravo's bedroom and met her mistress in the passage partially
undressed and on her way to bed. Mrs. Bravo and Mrs. Cox
entered their bedrooms and the former drank her Marsala and
went to bed.
In about quarter of an hour Mr. Bravo's bedroom door was
heard to open, and he shouted out, " Florence ! Florence !
Hot water." The maid ran into Mrs. Bravo's room, calling
out that Mr. Bravo was ill. Mrs. Cox, who had not yet
undressed, rose hastily and ran to his room. She found him
standing in his night-gown at the open window, apparently
vomiting, and this the maid also saw. Mrs. Cox further
stated that Mr. Bravo said to her, " I have taken poison.
Don't tell Florence " (alluding to his wife) ; and to this con-
fession on the part of Mr. Bravo, Mrs. Cox adhered. After
this, Mr. Bravo was again very sick, and some hot water was
brought by the maid. After the vomiting he sank on the floor
and became insensible, and remained so for some hours. Mrs.
Cox tried to raise him, and got some mustard and water, but
he could not swallow it. She then applied mustard to his
feet, an^ coffee was procured, but he was also unable to
swallow that. Meanwhile a doctor, who had attended Mrs.
Bravo, and who lived at some distance, was sent for. Mrs.
Bravo, who was aroused from sleep by the maid, and who
seems to have been greatly excited, insisted on a nearer
practitioner being sent for, and in a short time a medical man,
living close by, arrived on the scene. The doctor found Mr.
Bravo sitting or lying on a chair, completely unconscious,
THE BRAVO MYSTERY 285
and the heart's action almost suspended. He had him laid
on the bed, and then administered some hot brandy and
water, but was unable to get him to swallow it. In about half
an hour another medical man arrived, and was met by Mrs.
Cox, who said she was sure Mr. Bravo had taken chloroform.
Both doctors came to the conclusion that the patient was in a
dangerous state, and endeavoured to administer restoratives.
Realizing the critical nature of the case. Dr. George Johnson,
of King's College Hospital, was sent for. Meanwhile Mr.
Bravo was again seized with vomiting, mostly blood, and the
doctors came to the conclusion he was suffering from some
irritant poison. About three o'clock he became conscious and
able to be questioned. He was at once asked, " What have
you taken ? " But from first to last he persisted in declaring,
in the most solemn manner, that he had taken nothing except
some laudanum for toothache. In reply to other questions,
asking him if there were any poisons about the house, he
replied there was only the laudanum and chloroform for
toothache, some Condy's Fluid, and " rat poison in the
stable." Mr. Bravo did not lose consciousness again until the
time of his death, which occurred fifty-five and a half hours
after he was first taken ill.
At an early period his bedroom was searched, but nothing
was found but the laudanum bottle, and a little chloroform
and camphor liniment which had been brought from another
room. There were no remains of any solid poison in paper,
glass, or tumbler, and nothing to indicate any poison had
been taken. The post-mortem examination showed evidence
of great gastric irritation, extending downwards, but there
was no appearance of any disease in the body, or inflammation,
congestion or ulceration. It was left therefore to the chemical
analysis to show what was the irritating substance which
had been introduced into the body, and supply a key to part
of the mystery. The matters which had been vomited in
the early stage of Mr. Bravo 's illness had been thrown
away ; but on examination of the leads of the house
beneath the bedroom window, some portion of the matter
was found undisturbed, although much rain had fallen and
the greater part must have been washed away. This was
carefully collected and handed to Professor Redwood for
286 POISON MYSTERIES
analysis. From this matter he extracted a large amount of
antimony. Antimony was also discovered in the liver and
other parts of the body, and it was concluded that altogether
nearly forty grains of this poison must have been swallowed by
the unfortunate man. How he came to swallow this enormous
dose, whether the design was homicidal or suicidal, there was
not the slightest evidence to show, or where the antimony was
obtained. The whole affair was shrouded in mystery, and a
mystery it remains.
CHAPTER V
THE RUGELEY MYSTERY
STRYCHNINE is one of the active principles extracted from
nux vomica, the singular disk-like seed of the Strychnos
Nux vomica, a tree indigenous to most parts of India, Burma,
Northern Australia, and other countries. Nux vomica was
unknown to the ancients, and is said to have been introduced
into medicine by the Arabs, but there is very little reliable
record of it until the seventeenth century, when the seeds
were chiefly used for poisoning animals and birds. Strych-
nine was discovered in 1818 by Pelletier and Caventou,
and was first extracted from St. Ignatius' bean, another
species of strychnos in which it is present to the extent
of about 1-5 per cent. Very soon afterwards it was ex-
tracted from nux vomica, which, being very plentiful, is
now the chief source of the drug. It is extremely bitter in
taste, and may be distinctly detected in a solution containing
no more than one-six- hundred- thousandth part. For a con-
siderable time after its discovery, the detection of strychnine
in the body after death was a matter of great uncertainty,
especially when only a small quantity had been administered ;
but now it is possible to detect the presence of one-five-thou-
sandth part of a grain, and that even after some time has
elapsed. It has been used for criminal purposes by several
notorious poisoners, notably by Dove, Palmer, and Cream,
but the symptoms produced are so marked, and its presence
so clearly indicated, that detection now is almost certain.
Among the celebrated trials of the last century was that
of Dr. Palmer, who was charged with the wilful murder of
John Parsons Cook, at Rugeley, in 1855. A special Act of
Parliament was passed in order to have this case tried in
London, where it was brought before Lord Chief Justice
287
288 POISON MYSTERIES
Campbell, Mr. Baron Alderson, and Mr. Justice Cresswell, at
the Central Criminal Court, on May 14, 1856. The Attorney-
General, Mr. E. James, Q.C., with several other counsel,
conducted the prosecution, and Palmer was defended by
Mr. Serjeant Shee, Messrs. Grove, Q.C., Gray and Kenealy.
The accused, who was a country doctor, had carried on
a medical practice in Rugeley, a small town in Staffordshire,
for some years. Becoming interested in racing he made his
practice over to a man named Thirlby, a former assistant,
and shortly afterwards made the acquaintance of John P.
Cook over some betting transactions. Cook was a young man
of good family, about twenty-eight years of age, and was
intended for the legal profession. He was articled to a
solicitor ; but after a time, inheriting some property worth
between twelve and fifteen thousand pounds, he abandoned
law and commenced to keep race-horses. Meeting Palmer at
various race-meetings, they soon became very intimate. In a
very short time Palmer got into difficulties, and was com-
pelled to raise money on bills. Things went from bad to worse,
until he at last forged an acceptance to a bill in the name
of his mother, who was possessed of considerable property.
In 1854 he owed a large sum of money, and in the same year
his wife died, whose life, it transpired, he had insured for
£13,000. With this money he bought two race-horses ; but
in his betting transactions he lost heavily, and then com-
menced to borrow money from Cook, whose name he also
forged on one occasion on the back of a cheque. He insured
his brother's life for ;£i3,ooo, and very shortly after he died,
the amount being also paid to Palmer. This money soon
went, and at length he had two writs out against him for
£4,000.
In the meanwhile. Cook had been more successful than his
friend in his racing ventures, and had won a considerable
amount with a race-horse called Polestar. Polestar was
entered for the Shrewsbury races on November 14, 1855,
and Cook and Palmer went there and stayed with some friends
at the same hotel in that town. On the evening of the races
they were drinking brandy- an d-water together. Cook asked
Palmer to have some more, and the latter replied, " Not unless
you finish your glass." Cook, noticing that he had some still
THE RUGELEY MYSTERY 289
left in his tumbler, said, "111 soon do that," and finished it
at a draught. On swallowing it he immediately exclaimed,
" There's something in it burns my throat." Palmer took up
the glass and said, " Nonsense, there is nothing in it," and
called the attention of the others standing by. Cook then
suddenly left the room, and was seized with violent vomiting.
This became so bad that he soon had to be taken to bed, and
appeared to be very seriously ill. Two hours later a medical
man was sent for, who at once prescribed an emetic, and
then a pill. He obtained relief from these, and by the morning
the vomiting had ceased, and he was much better, though he
still felt very unwell. They returned to Rugeley together.
Cook taking rooms at an hotel directly opposite Palmer's
house. Cook was still confined to his room, and during the
next few days was constantly visited by Palmer, and after
each visit it was noticed the sickness commenced again. On
one occasion Palmer had some broth prepared, which he
specially wished Cook to take. The latter tried to swallow
it, but was immediately sick. It was then taken downstairs,
and a woman at the hotel, thinking it looked nice, took a
couple of tablespoonsful of it, but within half an hour she was
taken seriously ill and was obliged to go to bed, her symptoms
being exactly like those of Cook when first taken ill at
Shrewsbury. Three days afterwards a neighbouring doctor
was called in. Palmer telling him that Cook was suffering from
a bilious attack. Palmer then went off to London, his business
being to try and arrange about the settlement of some debts
that were pressing. From the time he left, it was noticed by
the doctor that Cook's condition rapidly improved and in a
day or two he was able to leave his bed and be up and dressed.
On Palmer's return to Rugeley he at once went to see Cook
and during the rest of his illness was constantly with him.
On the evening of his return he also called on a surgeon's
assistant, with whom he was acquainted, and purchased from
him three grains of strychnine. Cook was taking some pills
which had been prescribed by the doctor and which had done
him good. They were ordered to be taken at bed-time, and
the box containing themwas in his room. He was visited by
Palmer about eleven o'clock the same night, and up to that
time he was apparently well. After Palmer had left, about
T
290 POISON MYSTERIES
twelve o'clock the whole house was aroused by violent screams
proceeding from Cook's room. The servants rushed in and
found him writhing in great agony, shouting " Murder ! "
He was evidently suffering intense pain, and soon was seized
with convulsions. Palmer was at once sent for, and on his
arrival Cook was gasping for breath, and hardly able to speak.
He ran back to procure some medicine, which on his return
he gave him, but the sick man at once threw it back. The
attack gradually passed off, and by the morning he was some-
what better, but very weak. The same day Palmer visited
a chemist he knew in the town, and purchased six grains of
strychnine. During the afternoon a relative of Palmer's, who
was also a medical man, arrived on a visit to Rugeley, and he
was taken to see Cook, and in the evening a consultation was
held by the three medical men. They agreed to prescribe
some medicine for the patient in the form of pills, which were
prepared, and in the course of the evening were handed to
Palmer, who was to administer the dose the last thing at night.
About half-past ten Palmer gave Cook two of the pills,
settled him comfortably for the night, and went home. At
ten minutes to eleven Cook roused the house with a frightful
scream, calling out, "I'm going to be ill as I was last night."
Palmer was sent for, and brought him two more pills, which
he said contained ammonia, and gave them to Cook. Very
shortly aifterwards convulsions set in, which were followed by
tetanus, and the unfortunate man died in a few minutes in
great agony.
The deceased man's relatives were communicated with, and
his father-in-law soon arrived in Rugeley. On Palmer being
questioned about Cook's' affairs, he said that he held a paper
drawn up by a lawyer, and signed by Cook stating that, in
respect of £4,000 worth of bills, he (Cook) was alone liable,
and Palmer had a claim for that amount against the estate.
This, with other matters, aroused suspicion, and it was decided
to hold a post-mortem examination on the body to ascertain
the cause of death. Palmer was present at the examination
and by his deliberate act the fluid contents of the stomach
were lost. What portions of the body were recovered for
analysis he did all he could to prevent from reaching the
analysts, When the jars, etc., were being sent to London for
THE RUGELEY MYSTERY 291
examination by the Government analyst, he intercepted them,
and offered the post-boy £10 to upset the conveyance and
break them.
The evidence offered at the trial was almost entirely circum-
stantial, and the medical testimony was very conflicting. It
was supposed, in the first instance, Palmer had administered
tartar emetic to his victim, but that for the fatal dose strych-
nine was used. It was proved Palmer had purchased
strychnine under suspicious circumstances on the morning of
the day on which Cook died, and could not account for the
purchase of it, or state what he had done with it. The symp-
toms appeared at a time which would correspond to the
interval that precedes the action of strychnine, being developed
over the entire body and limbs in a few minutes, suddenly and
with violence. None of the pills could be obtained for analysis.
Dr. Taylor, who made the analytical examination, was
unable to find any trace of strychnine in the portions sub-
mitted to him, but he found half a grain of antimony in
the blood ; but judging from the clinical symptoms before
death he believed Cook died from the effects of strychnine.
The great point in the case was, did the tetanic symptoms,
under which the deceased man died, depend on disease or
poison ? Doctors Brodie, Christison and Todd, and other
eminent authorities of the time agreed that when taken as a
whole they were not in accordance with any form of disease,
but were in perfect accordance with the effects of strychnine.
On the other hand, medical men called for the defence testified
that tetanus might be caused by natural disease, and the
deceased might have died from angina pectoris or epilepsy.
In spite of the absence of confirmatory chemical evidence
and proof of the presence of strychnine in the body, after one
hour and seventeen minutes' deliberation, the jury returned
a verdict of " Guilty," and Palmer was sentenced to death,
the trial having lasted twelve days.
The rigid and fixed condition of the limbs is a marked
feature after poisoning by strychnine. In the Horsford case,
in which a farmer named Walter Horsford was convicted of
the murder of his cousin Annie Holmes, at St. Neots, in 1897,
3*69 grains of strychnine were recovered from the internal
organs, after the body was exhumed, nineteen days after death.
292 POISON MYSTERIES
Even then, rigidity was very marked, especially in the lower
limbs and fingers. The same rigidity was remarked by Dr.
Stevenson in the case of Matilda Clover, who was poisoned
by Neill Cream with strychnine in 1891. In this case,
the body had been buried from October until May, and the
rigidity in the limbs and fingers was still maintained. Dr.
Stevenson stated that usually when persons are suffering
from strychnine poisoning, they are very apprehensive of
death. He had known a woman say, " I am going to die "
before any intimation of symptoms had occurred. The first
apprehension is, that some terrible calamity is about to take
place.
CHAPTER VI
THE CASE OF DR. PRITCHARD
THE remarkable case of Dr. E. W. Pritchard, of Glasgow,
who was arrested and charged with murdering his wife
^^^ mother-in-law in that city in the year 1865, excited great
interest at the time. The respectable position occupied by
the accused man in Glasgow, and the practice as a physician
which he had been enabled to attain in the course of his
six years' residence there, awakened an unusual degree of
attention in the public mind when the fact of his apprehension
became known. The excitement was strengthened by the
mystery invariably attached to the prosecution of all criminal
inquiries in Scotland.
It transpired that for some time previous to her decease,
Mrs. Pritchard had been in a delicate state of health, and her
mother, Mrs. Taylor, wife of Mr. Taylor, a silk weaver, of Edin-
burgh, had gone to Glasgow to nurse her during her illness.
Mrs. Taylor took up her abode in the house of Dr. Pritchard,
and ministered to her daughter's comfort ; but while so
engaged she became ill, and died suddenly, about three weeks
previous to the day on which the accused man was appre-
hended. The cause of death was assigned to apoplexy, and
as the lady was about seventy years oS. age no suspicions were
aroused, and the body was conveyed to Edinburgh and
buried in the Grange Cemetery.
Circumstances closely following on this, however, awakened
grave suspicions. Mrs. Pritchard died shortly after her mother,
and a report was circulated that she had succumbed to gastric
fever. The family grave at the Grange cemetery was fixed
on as the place of interment, and arrangements were made
for the funeral without delay. The body was taken to Edin-
burgh by rail, and Dr. Pritchard accompanied it to the house
293
294 POISON MYSTERIES
of his father-in-law, where it was to await interment. The
deaths of the two ladies occurring within so short an interval
of each other, coupled with certain hints which they had
received, set the police on the alert, and while Dr. Pritchard
was absent in Edinburgh they instituted inquiries, which led
to a warrant being issued for his apprehension. On his return
to Glasgow, previous to the day fixed for the funeral, he was
arrested at the railway station in Queen Street and conveyed
to the police station.
Meanwhile the authorities had transmitted to Edinburgh
information of what had been done, and at the same time
had issued a warrant for a post-mortem examination on the
body of Mrs. Pritchard. This was entrusted to Professor
Douglas Maclagan, assisted by Drs. Arthur Gamgee and Little-
john. The result of the post-mortem proved that death had
not resulted from natural causes, and a subsequent examin-
ation disclosed the presence of minute particles of antimony
in the liver.
The case now assumed a grave and mysterious aspect, and
the authorities resolved to carry the investigations further.
The next step was to order the exhumation of the body of Mrs.
Taylor. This having been effected, the internal organs were
submitted to analysis by Professor Maclagan, Dr. Little John,
and Professor Penny, of Glasgow, who, after a protracted
examination, reported that the death of Mrs. Taylor, like
that of her daughter, was due to poisoning by antimony.
On these facts being elicited. Dr. Pritchard was fully committed
on the charge of murdering Jane Taylor, his mother-in-law,
and Mary Jane Pritchard, his wife.
The trial opened on July 3, 1865, at the High Court of
Justiciary, Edinburgh, before the Lord Justice-Clerk, Lord
Ardmillan, and Lord Jerviswoode, the Solicitor-General
prosecuting for the Crown, while the prisoner was defended
by Messrs. A. R. Clark, Watson and Brand.
Evidence was given that Mrs. Pritchard was first taken ill
in the October of 1864, with constant vomiting, often accom-
panied by severe cramp. After being treated by her husband
for some time, and getting no better, at her own request
a Dr. Gardiner was called in, and her mother, Mrs. Taylor,
came from Edinburgh to nurse her.
THE CASE OF DR. PRITCHARD 295
While on this visit to her daughter, Mrs. Taylor, on February
24, 1865, complained of feeling unwell. The next day she was
found insensible, sitting on her chair in her daughter's room,
and died the same night. From this time, Mrs. Pritchard got
gradually worse, and died within three weeks afterwards.
Mary McLeod, a girl who had been in the service of the
prisoner, admitted that he had familiar relations with her,
and that this fact was known to Mrs. Pritchard. The
doctor had also made her presents, and told her he would
marry her if his wife died.
Dr. Paterson, a medical practitioner, of Glasgow, who was
called in to see Mrs. Taylor, stated Pritchard told him the old
lady was in the habit of taking Batley's solution of opium, and
a few days before her death she had purchased a half-pound
bottle. When he saw her, he was convinced her symptoms
betokened that she was under the depressing influence of
antimony, and not opium. He therefore refused to give a
certificate of death.
Pritchard eventually signed the certificate himself,
stating the primary cause of death had been paralysis and the
secondary cause apoplexy. He further certified Mrs.
Pritchard's death as due to gastric fever.
It was proved on the evidence of two chemists, that Pritch-
ard was in the habit of purchasing tartarated antimony in
large quantities, and also Fleming's tincture of aconite.
Dr. Maclagan, Professor of Medical Jurisprudence at the
University of Edinburgh, was called to give the result of
the chemical examination of the various organs of the body
of Mrs. Pritchard, which had been retained for analysis.
Antimony, corresponding to one-fourth of a grain of tartar
emetic, was found in the urine, in small quantities in the bile
and the blood, and as much as four grains in the whole liver.
Evidence of the presence of antimony was also found in the
spleen, kidney, muscular substance of the heart, coats of the
stomach and rectum, the brain and uterus.
Antimony was also detected in various stains on linen and
articles of clothing, which had been worn by Mrs. Pritchard
during her illness.
From these results Dr. Maclagan concluded that Mrs.
Pritchard had taken a large quantity of antimony in the form
296 POISON MYSTERIES
of tartar emetic, which caused her death, and that from the
extent to which the whole organs and fluids of the body were
impregnated with the drug, it must have been given in repeated
doses up to within a few hours of her decease.
The result of the chemical examination of the various organs
of the body of Mrs. Taylor, which was exhumed for this pur-
pose, revealed the presence of 0*279, ^^ ^ little more than a
quarter of a grain of antimony in the contents of the stomach.
Antimony was also found in the blood, and i"i5i grain was
recovered from the liver.
Dr. Penny, who made an independent analysis, found dis-
tinct evidence of antimony in the liver, spleen, kidney, brain,
heart, blood, and rectum, but no trace of morphine or aconite.
He also came to the conclusion that Mrs. Pritchard's death
had resulted from the effects of antimony.
Antimony was found mixed with tapioca contained in a
packet discovered in the house, also in a bottle containing
Batley's solution of opium found in the prisoner's surgery.
Dr. Littlejohn, surgeon to the Edinburgh police, who was
present at the post-mortem examination of both women, gave
his opinion that Mrs. Pritchard's death had been due to the
administration of antimony in small quantities, and that con-
tinuously. In Mrs. Taylor's case he believed some strong
narcotic poison had been administered with the antimony.
This opinion was further endorsed by Dr. Paterson.
Evidence was offered, that Pritchard had been in the habit
of purchasing large quantities of Batley's solution of opium,
which the manufacturers swore contained no antimony. For
the defence it was urged that there was no proof whatever
that poison had been administered by the prisoner, who had
always lived on affectionate terms with his wife, and that the
motive suggested was of the most trifling nature ; that the
stronger suspicion pointed to the maid-servant, Mary McLeod,
on whose uncorroborated statements the chief evidence
against the prisoner lay. The senior counsel for the prisoner
(Mr. Clark) concluded his address by stating that the Crown
had admitted there were but two persons who could have
committed the crime — the prisoner and Mary McLeod.
Mary McLeod's hand had been found in connection with every
one of the acts in which poison was said to have been admin-
THE CASE OF DR. PRITCHARD 297
istered in the food. The case against the prisoner seemed to
depend on a series of suspicions and probabiHties, and not
upon legal proof, and upon these grounds he asked for a
verdict of acquittal.
The summing-up of the Lord Justice-Clerk occupied three
hours and twenty minutes, on the conclusion of which the
jury retired to consider their verdict. After an absence of
fifty-five minutes they returned with the following verdict,
" The jury unanimously find the prisoner guilty of both
charges as libelled."
Dr. Pritchard was thereupon sentenced to death, and was
executed at Glasgow on July 28, 1865.
There can be little doubt that he fully deserved his fate.
CHAPTER VII
THE CASE OF DR. LAMSON
THE only case on record in which ;the active principle
of aconite has been used for the purpose of criminal
poisoning is that of Dr. Lamson, who suffered the extreme
penalty of the law for administering the drug to Percy Malcolm
John, and thereby causing his death. The story is remarkable
for the cold-blooded way in which the murder was carried
out.
George Henry Lamson, a surgeon in impecunious circum-
stances, had a reversionary interest, through his wife, in a
sum of £1,500, which would come to him on the death of his
brother-in-law, Percy Malcolm John. The latter, a sickly
youth of eighteen years of age, was paralysed in his lower
limbs from old-standing spinal disease.
At the beginning of December, 1881, Lamson went down to
the school where John had been placed as a boarder, and had
an interview with him in the presence of the head master,
professing at the same time a kindly interest in the youth and
his health. During the interview he produced some gelatine
capsules, one of which he offered to the head master in order
that he might see how easily it dissolved in the mouth, and
another he filled with a white powder presumed to be sugar
and gave to his brother-in-law. Directly after seeing him
swallow it he took his departure. Within a quarter of an hour,
the boy became unwell, saying he felt the same as when
Lamson had given him a quinine pill on a former occasion,
also adding " My skin feels all drawn up and my throat
burning."
Violent vomiting soon set in, and he became unable to
swaUow. This was rapidly followed by delirium, and in three
hours and three-quarters death ensued.
298
THE CASE OF DR. LAMSON 299
A post-mortem examination was ordered, and the organs
of the body, together with the remainder of the capsules, and
various pills and powders found in the boy's room which had
been sent to him at different times by Dr. Lamson, were sent
for analysis. Meanwhile from information received by the
police from another quarter Lamson was arrested and charged
with the murder of his brother-in-law.
The trial began on March 9, 1882, before Mr. Justice
Hawkins, the Solicitor- General, Mr. Poland, appearing for the
prosecution, and Mr. Montagu Williams and others for the
defence.
The Solicitor-General in his opening speech stated, that
the post-mortem on the body revealed the fact, that the only
sign of disease was the old-standing curvature of the spine and
evidence of paralysis in the lower extremities. There was
much, however, that called for remark in the condition of the
stomach and other organs. The conclusion that the medical
men came to was, that there was no natural cause to account
for death, but that the state of the stomach indicated that
death had resulted from poison — not what was called a local
irritant poison, but some vegetable poison which had acted
upon the nerves and other centres.
Dr. Stevenson, who, together with Dr. Dupre, had conducted
the analysis, gave evidence, and began by stating that he had
received besides the organs of the body, certain packets of
pills, powders, sugar, etc. Working in collaboration with
Dr. Dupre, he applied a modification of Stas's process to the
liver, spleen and kidneys, and the result obtain-ed was an
alkaloidal extract which contained a trace of morphine, and
when placed on the tongue gave a faint sensation like that
produced by aconitine. The contents of the stomach, treated
by the same process, also revealed an alkaloidal extract
which when tasted produced the same faint sensation as that
of aconitine. " When placed on the tongue," he continued,
" the contact caused a burning sensation which extended to the
lip, although the extract did not touch the lip. The character
of the sensation was a burning and a tingling, a kind of numb-
ness. It is difficult to describe. It produced a salivation, a
desire to expectorate and a sensation at the back of the throat
as if it were swelling up, and this was foUowed by a peculiar
300 POISON MYSTERIES
seared feeling as if a hot iron had been drawn over the tongue,
or some strong caustic placed upon it.
" The effect of aconitine is a burning feeling extending
down towards the stomach. It is a sickening feeling peculiar
to this substance. I have never found it in any other alkaloid,
and I have tasted a great number.
" With a portion of the alkaloidal extract," Dr. Stevenson
proceeded, " I made an experiment. I dissolved it and
injected it beneath the skin of a mouse. The animal was
obviously affected in two minutes. From that time onward it
exhibited symptoms of poisoning and died in thirty minutes
from the time of the injection of the substance. I then made
a similar experiment with Morson's preparation of aconitine,
procured specially for this purpose. I dissolved it in the
same solution that I had used for the extract and operated
with it on the mouse in the same manner. The effect was
indistinguishable from that of the extract."
This same experiment was repeated with extracts made
from the different organs, and each time the same result was
obtained. On analysis of the vomit an alkaloidal extract
was again obtained. Dr. Stevenson applied this to his tongue
and found it had a very powerful result, the effect lasting
markedly for six and a half hours. On an injection being
made into the back of a mouse it was severely affected in
two and a half minutes and death resulted in fifteen minutes.
" Parallel results," he stated, " were obtained with aconitine.
In my judgment the vomit contained a considerable quantity
of aconitine. Approximately, it was not less than one-seventh
and not more than one-fourth of a grain. There has only
been one fatal case that I know of in which aconitine has
caused the death of a human being, and the quantity that
proved fatal — the quantity that actually caused death — was
known not to be less than one- thirteenth of a grain."
Dr. Stevenson then described the results of the analysis
of the various powders, pills, etc., that had been handed to
him. In the sweetmeats, cake and sugar he found no trace of
poison at all. He then turned to the quinine powders, of which
there were fourteen. " My attention," he said, "was called
to one by Dr. Dupre. It was a little different in colour, as
also were two others, and was obvious to the trained eye.
THE CASE OF DR. LAMSON 301
An analysis of one revealed 0-83 gr. of aconitine and 0-93 gr.
of quinine." On testing one of the pills also, he came to the
conclusion that it contained 0*45, or nearly half a grain of
aconitine.
The capsules were handed to the judge, who remarked
that the half grain took up barely one-tenth of the space in
the capsule.
In the course of the trial it transpired that the prisoner
had become possessed of aconitine a few days before the crime
was committed. On the nth of November he had been to a
chemist in Oxford St., and had a prescription made up consist-
ing of atropine and morphine. On the i6th he called again
and asked for a grain of digitalin, saying it was for external
use. The liquid in the bottle was found to be discoloured,
and the assistant, fearing it might be impure, refused to supply
it. A few days later Dr. Lamson called again and asked for
some aconitine. The assistant, knowing this was a poison
of a very dangerous character, declined to supply it and
advised him to go where he was better known.
Dr. Lamson then went on November 24th to a firm of
chemists in the city and asked for two grains of aconitine.
Asked for his name, he wrote George H. Lamson, Bournemouth,
and the name being in the Medical Directory, he was duly
supplied with the required amount. When the name of Dr.
Lamson appeared in the newspapers in connection with the
death of Percy John, the assistant who had supplied the
poison drew the attention of his employers to the circumstance,
and the police were communicated with.
Mr. Montagu Williams, for the defence, urged that the results
of Dr. Stevenson's and Dr. Dupre's experiments were con-
sistent with other causes and suggested that the extracts which
were so fatal to the mice might contain certain animal poisons,
the result of decomposition. He contended that it had been
admitted that very little was known of aconitine, and that
therefore these tests were not to be relied upon. The proper
verdict, he submitted, would be the Scottish one of " Non
Proven," and as that was not possible in England, the prisoner
was entitled to an acquittal. He reminded the jury of the
weak state of the boy's health, and the general expectation
that he would not live long.
302 POISON MYSTERIES
• The judge, in summing up, said the question for the jury to
decide was whether they were satisfied the deceased came to
his death by poison, and if so whether the poison was admin-
istered by the prisoner. It was for the prosecution to prove
the guilt of the prisoner, and if they failed to do so the case
was at an end. The trial lasted for six days, and after the
summing-up, the jury retired, returning after an absence of
twenty-five minutes, with a verdict of " Guilty." The
judge then pronounced sentence of death on Lamson, which
was duly carried out on August 28, 1882.
According to evidence at the trial, it is probable that
Lamson had made several previous attempts on the boy's
life with aconitine in the form of pills and powders, which he
had given him under the pretence of prescribing for his ail-
ments. The money to which he was entitled on the death of
John doubtless supplied the motive for the crime.
Lamson, as a medical man, no doubt knew that there was no
chemical test for aconitine, and that it would not be likely to be
detected during the post-mortem. In fact, there was nothing
to show after the autopsy that the cause of death was not
natural, and it was only the few words uttered by the dying
boy, alluding to his sensations, which gave the clue to the
scientific investigators.
The difficulty of proving the presence of a rare vegetable
alkaloid in the body after death was, no doubt, duly considered
by Lamson when he fixed on aconitine as the medium for his
evil design, but science proved the master of the criminal, and
the evidence of the instrument by which the crime was com-
mitted was proved indisputably.
CHAPTER VIII
THE PIMLICO MYSTERY
CHLOROFORM belongs to the class of neurotic poisons
which act on the brain, and produce loss of sensation.
It is a colourless, heavy and volatile' liquid, having a peculiar
ethereal odour which cannot be easily mistaken, and a sweet
pungent taste when diluted. For producing insensibility it
requires both careful and experienced administration, and
more lives have been lost by carelessness in using than from
the noxious character of the drug.
The stories that appear from time to time, of persons who
have been rendered unconscious simply by waving a chloro-
formed handkerchief before the face, usually emanate from
the fertile brain of some imaginative j ournalist . As an internal
poison chloroform has rarely been used, although there are
many cases on record where persons have accustomed them-
selves to drinking chloroform, until they have been able to
swallow it in very large quantities. The one recorded instance
in which it was alleged to have been used internally for the
criminal destruction of life was in the remarkable case known
as the " Pimlico Mystery."
The trial of Adelaide Bartlett, for the wilful murder of her
husband by administering chloroform to him, was held before
Mr. Justice Wills at the Central Criminal Court on April 12,
1886, and lasted for six days. The case attracted consider-
able attention and interest throughout, which culminated in
a dramatic scene at the close, and the acquittal of the accused
woman. The strange relations which existed between Mrs.
Bartlett and her husband, with whose murder she was charged,
the yet more strange relations between her and the man who
in the first instance was included in the accusation, together
with the exceptional circumstances of his acquittal and his
303
304 POISON MYSTERIES
immediate appearance in the witness-box, formed a case of
peculiar dramatic interest.
Thomas Edwin Bartlett was a grocer, having several shops
in the suburbs of London, and at the time of his death was
forty years of age. In 1875 he married a young French
girl named Adelaide Blanche de la Tremoille, who
was a native of Orleans, whom he met at the house of his
brother. After the marriage he sent her to a boarding-
school at Stoke Newington, and she lived with her husband
only during the vacation. At a later period she went to a
convent school in Belgium, where she remained for about
eighteen months, after which she rejoined her husband,
and settled down to live in London. During Christmas of
1 88 1 she gave birth to a stillborn child, which so affected her
that she came to the resolution that she would have no more
children. Some four years later Mr. Bartlett and his wife made
the acquaintance of the Rev. George Dyson, a young Wesleyan
minister, who soon became on terms of great social intimacy,
visiting and dining with them frequently. The admiration for
their friend seems to have been common to both husband and
wife. In 1885 Edwin Bartlett made a will, leaving aU he
possessed to his wife, and making Mr. Dyson and his solicitors
his executors. Shortly afterwards the Bartletts removed to
furnished apartments in Claverton Street, Pimlico, where
they apparently lived on good terms, and were still frequently
visited by their friend Mr. Dyson.
On December 10, in the same year, Mr. Bartlett became
seriously ill. Peculiar symptoms developed, which excited
the curiosity and surprise of the medical man called in to
attend him. The state of his gums suggested to the doctor
that the illness was due to mercury, which in some way was
being administered to him, and he complained of nervous
depression and sleeplessness. He appeared to be gradually
recovering from this, but on December 19 Mr. Bartlett himself
suggested that a second doctor should be called in, lest, as he
put it, '.' his friends should suspect, if anything happened to
him, that his wife was poisoning him." The cause for this
was put down to some ill-feeling which had formerly existed
between Mrs. Bartlett and her husband's father. A second
practitioner, therefore, was called in, and the patient, on
THE PIMLICO MYSTERY 305
December 26, though still weak, was practically well and
went out for a drive.
The next day Mrs. Bartlett asked Mr. Dyson, who was
constantly calling at the house, to procure for her a consider-
able quantity of chloroform, which she told him she had used
before on her husband for some internal ailment of long
standing, and that this internal affection had upon previous
occasions given him paroxysms. She further expressed a
belief that he might die suddenly in one of these attacks.
Dyson seems meekly to have yielded to her request, and
obtained three different lots of chloroform, in all six
ounces, from various chemists, giving the reason that he
required it for taking out grease spots, and placed it all
together in one bottle. Two days after, he met Mrs.
Bartlett on the Embankment and handed her the chloro-
form.
During his illness, Mr. Bartlett had slept on a camp bedstead
in the front drawing-room, his wife occupying a sofa in the
same room. On December 31 he was apparently in good health,
and about half-past ten o'clock in the evening, Mrs. Bartlett
told the servant she required nothing else and retired with
her husband for the night. At four o'clock in the morning
the house was aroused by Mrs. Bartlett, and it was discovered
her husband was dead in bed.
The statement made by the lady was, that when her husband
had settled for the night she sat down at the foot of the
bed with her hand resting upon his feet. She dozed off
in her chair, but awoke with a sensation of cramp, and was
horrified to find her husband's feet were deathly cold. She
tried to pour some brandy down his throat, and then found he
was dead. She then aroused the household. The first
person who entered the room was the landlord, who noticed
a peculiar smell that reminded him of chloric ether. The
doctor was promptly sent for, but from external examination
could find nothing to account for death. The only bottle
found was one that contained a drop or two of chlorodyne.
A post-mortem examination was held, and the stomach showed
evidence of having contained a considerable quantity of
chloroform. There was no internal disease or growth, the
organs being quite healthy, and nothing to account for death
u
3o6 POISON MYSTERIES
beyond the chloroform, which the medical men concluded
must have been the cause of death.
The coroner's inquiry resulted in a verdict of wilful murder
against Adelaide Bartlett and George Dyson, and they were
both arrested.
At the trial, the Crown decided to offer no evidence against
Dyson, and, after being indicted and pleading " Not guilty,"
he was discharged by the judge to be called as a witness.
A brilliant array of counsel were engaged on the case.
Sir Charles Russell had charge of the prosecution, while
the defence of Mrs. Bartlett was entrusted to Sir Edward
Clarke, and that of Mr. Dyson to Mr. Lockwood.
Dyson's examination occupied nearly the whole of the
second day of the trial, during which he detailed the form
of the intimacy between Mrs. Bartlett and himself. He
related how he procured the chloroform and disposed of
the bottles after hearing the result of the post-mortem
by throwing them away on Wandsworth Common while
on his way to preach at Tooting. He was in the habit of
kissing Mrs. Bartlett, and usually called her Adelaide. He
had had conversations with Mr. Bartlett on the subject of
marriage, and had heard him express the opinion that a man
should have two wives, one to look after the household duties,
and another to be a companion and confidante. He had told
Mr. Bartlett he was becoming attached to his wife, but the
latter seemed to encourage it, and asked him to continue the
intimacy. He did not mention the matter of having procured
the chloroform for Mrs. Bartlett until he had heard the result
of the post-mortem.
The medical man called in to attend Mr. Bartlett during his
illness described the condition in which he found him, and
his recovery from the illness. He also gave an account of a
very extraordinary statement, which was made to him by Mrs.
Bartlett after the death of her husband. It was as follows.
At the age of sixteen years she was selected by Mr. Bartlett
as a wife for companionship only, and for whom no carnal
feeling should be entertained. The marriage compact was,
that they should live together simply as loving friends. This
rule was faithfully observed for about six years of their married
life, and then only broken at her earnest and repeated entreaty
THE PIMLICO MYSTERY 307
that she should be permitted to be really a wife and a mother.
The child was stillborn, and from that time the two lived
together, but their relations were not those of matrimony.
Her husband showed great affection for her of an ultra-
platonic kind, and encouraged her to pursue various studies,
which she did to please him. He affected to admire her, and
liked to surround her with male acquaintances, and enjoy their
attentions to her. Then they became acquainted with Dyson.
Her husband conceived a great liking for him, and threw them
together. He requested them to kiss in his presence and
seemed to enjoy it, and gave her to understand that he had
" given her " to Mr. Dyson. As her husband gradually
recovered from his illness he expressed a wish that they should
resume the ordinary relations of man and wife, but she
resented it. She therefore sought for some means to prevent
his desire, and for this purpose she asked Dyson to procure
the chloroform.
On the night of his death, some conversation of this kind
had taken place between them, and when he was in bed she
brought the bottle of chloroform. She gave it to him, inform-
ing him of her intention to sprinkle some upon a handkerchief
and wave it in his face, thinking that thereby he would go
peacefully to sleep. He looked at the bottle and placed it
by the side of the low bed, then, turning over on his side,
apparently went to sleep. She fell asleep also, sitting at the
foot of the bed, with her arm round his foot ; she heard him
snoring, then woke again, and found he was dead.
Dr. Stevenson, who made the analysis, gave evidence as
to finding eleven and a quarter grains of pure chloroform in
the stomach of the deceased, but, judging from the time that
had elapsed and the very volatile nature of the liquid, a large
quantity must have been swallowed. No other poisons were
found. The jury, after deliberating nearly two hours, returned
a verdict of " Not guilty," and Mrs. Bartlett was acquitted.
There was no evidence to prove that chloroform had been
administered to Mr. Bartlett, and it was suggested that he
had awoke, and by mistake swallowed some of the contents,
of the bottle.
CHAPTER IX
THE MAYBRICK CASE
ON July 31, 1889, o^^ of the most remarkable poisoning
cases on record was tried before Mr. Justice Stephen,
at the Liverpool Assizes. The trial, which lasted eight days,
excited the keenest interest in the-locality and throughout the
country, especially as the principal actors in the tragedy were
people of good social position and well known. The accused,
Mrs. Florence May brick, wife of a Liverpool merchant, was
charged with causing the death of her husband by adminis-
tering arsenic to him.
About the end of April, 1889, Mr. James Maybrick, who
lived at Grassendale, near Liverpool, was seized with a peculiar
illness, of which the main symptoms consisted of a rigidity
of the limbs and a general feeling of sickness which quite
prostrated him, and eventually confined him to bed. The
local medical man who was called in to attend him, attributed
the cause to extreme irritability of the stomach and treated
him accordingly. Becoming puzzled by the persistent
sickness and the rapidly increasing weakness of his patient,
he called a physician in consultation. From this time he
grew considerably worse and severer symptoms set in, which
caused the doctors to suspect the cause was due to some
irritant poison. This was confirmed by the discovery that
arsenic had been placed in a bottle of meat-juice that was
being administered to the sick man. At the instance of the
physician called in consultation, trained nurses were placed
in charge, and a close watch kept on the patient, but without
avail, and he died on May 11.
From statements made to the police, suspicions were
■aroused, Mrs. Maybrick was arrested, and eventually charged
with the wilful murder of her husband.
308
THE MAYBRICK CASE 309
From evidence given at the trial, it transpired that the rela-
tions between husband and wife had not been of the most
cordial character for some time. There were frequent dis-
agreements, and just before Mr. May brick was taken ill there
had been a serious quarrel, resulting from his wife's relations
with another man. The lady resented the accusation, and a
separation was contemplated. The fatal illness then inter-:
vened, during the first portion of which Mrs. Maybrick nursed
her husband. A letter addressed to her lover, which she
had given to a nursemaid to post, was opened by the girl
and handed to Mr. Maybrick 's brother, trained nurses were
called in and the sick man placed in their sole charge. This
letter, which formed one of the strongest pieces of evidence
against the accused, revealed the connection between Mrs.
Maybrick and her lover, and conveyed the intelligence to
him that her husband was " sick unto death." Evidence
was also given by the servants of fly-papers having been
seen in process of maceration in water in Mrs. Maybrick's
bedroom. The trained nurses also gave evidence concerning
the suspicious conduct of Mrs. Maybrick in tampering with
the medicines and meat- juice which were to be administered
to the patient. These suspicions culminated in the discovery
of arsenic in a bottle of meat-juice by one of the medical
attendants. Considerable quantities of arsenic were found
by the police in the house, including a packet containing
seventy-one grains, mixed with charcoal, and labelled " Poison
for cats."
The analytical examination was conducted by Dr. Stevenson
and Mr. Edward Davis, a Liverpool analyst, who discovered
traces of arsenic in the intestines, and 0*049 ^^ ^ grain of arsenic
in the liver, traces of the poison being also found in the spleen.
Arsenic was also found in various medicine bottles, on hand-
kerchiefs, in bottles of glycerin, and in the pocket of a dress-
ing-gown belonging to the accused. Dr. Stevenson stated that
he believed the body of the deceased at the time of death
probably contained a fatal dose of arsenic.
The scientific evidence adduced at the trial was of a very
conflicting character. On one hand, the medical men who
attended the deceased, and the Government analyst, swore
they believed that death was caused from the effects of arsenic ;_
310 POISON MYSTERIES
while on the other, Dr. Tidy, who was called for the defence,
stated as an expert that the quantity of arsenic discovered in
the body did not point to the fact that an overdose had
been administered. He believed that death had been due to
gastro-enteritis of some kind or other, but that the symptoms
and post-mortem appearances distinctly pointed away from
arsenic as the cause of death. Dr. Macnamara, ex-president
of the Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland, also stated that in
his opinion Mr. Maybrick's death had not been caused by
arsenical poisoning and that he agreed with Dr. Tidy that the
cause was gastro-enteritis, unconnected with arsenical poison-
ing. For the defence, it was also urged that the deceased
man had been in the habit of taking arsenic in considerable
quantities for some years. In support of this, witnesses
were called to prove that he had been in the habit of taking a
mysterious white powder, and that while living in America,
he frequently purchased arsenic from chemists, who knew
he was in the habit of taking it. A negro, who had been
in the service of the deceased in America, also deposed to
seeing him take this white powder in beef tea.
Sir Charles Russell, in his speech for the defence, stated
that Mr. Maybrick had been in the habit of taking arsenic
for many years, and was a man who prided himself on his
knowledge of medicine. What was more likely than that
he should have had a supply of that poison in the house, and
that he had ultimately dosed himself to death with it ?
After the last witness for the defence had left the box. Sir
Charles Russell held a rapid consultation with Mrs. Maybrick.
A glance of dissatisfaction crossed his face as he turned to
the judge and asked if the prisoner might make a statement.
The judge replied in the affirmative and the accused woman
rose to her feet, and in a low voice broken by emotion read
the following plea from a written paper she held in her hand,
amid the breathless silence of those in court : — •
" My Lord, I wish to make a statement, as well as I can,
about a few facts in connection with the dreadful and crushing
charge against me — the charge of poisoning my husband and
father of my dear children. I wish principally to refer to
the fly-paper solution. The flypapers I bought with the
intention of using the solution as a cosmetic. Before my
THE MAYBRICK CASE 311
marriage, and since for many years, I have been in the habit
of using this wash for the face prescribed for me by Dr. Graves,
of Brooklyn. It consisted, I beheve, principally, of arsenic,
tincture of benzoin, elder-fiower water, and some other
ingredients. This prescription I lost or mislaid last April,
and as at the time I was suffering from an eruption on the
face, I thought I should like to try and make a substitute my-
self. I was anxious to get rid of this eruption before I went
to a ball on the 30th of that month. When I had been in
Germany among my young friends there, I had seen used a
solution derived from fly-papers soaked in elder-flower water,
and then applied to the face with a handkerchief well soaked
in the solution. I procured the fly-papers and used them in
the same manner, and to avoid evaporation I put the solution
into a bottle so as to avoid as much as possible the admission
of the air. For this purpose I put a plate over the fly-papers,
then a folded towel over that, and then another towel over
that. My mother has been aware for a great many years
that I have used arsenic in solution. I now wish to speak
of his illness. On Thursday night, May 9, after the nurse had
given my husband medicine I went and sat on the bed beside
him. He complained to me of feeling very sick, ver}^ weak
and very restless. He implored me then again to give him
a powder which he had referred to earlier in the evening, and
which I declined to give him. I was over- wrought, terribly
anxious, miserably unhappy, and his evident distress utterly
unnerved me. As he told me the powder would not harm
him, and that I could put it in his food, I then consented.
My Lord, I had not one true or honest friend in the house.
I had no one to consult, no one to advise me. I was deposed
from my position as mistress of my own house, and from the
position of attending on my husband, and notwithstanding that
he was so ill, and notwithstanding the evidence of the nurses
and the servants, I may say that he missed me whenever
I was not with him ; whenever I was out of the room he asked
for me, and four days before he died I was not allowed to
give him a piece of ice without its being taken out of my
hand. I took the meat juice into the inner room. On going
through the door I spilled some of the liquid from the bottle,
and in order to make up the quantity spilled I put in a con-
siderable quantity of water. On returning into the room I
found my husband asleep. I placed the bottle on the table
near the window. As he did not ask for anything then, and
as I was not anxious to give him anything, I removed it
312 POISON MYSTERIES
from the small table where it attracted his attention and put
it on the washstand where he could not see it. There I left
it. Until Tuesday, May 14, the Tuesday after my husband's
death, till a few moments before the terrible charge was
made against me, no one in that house had informed me of
the fact that a death certificate had been refused — or that
there was any reason to suppose that my husband had died
from any other than natural causes. It was only when a
witness alluded to the presence of arsenic in the meat- juice
that I was made aware of the nature of the powder my husband
had been taking. In conclusion, I only wish to say that for
the love of our children, and for the sake of their future, a
perfect reconciliation had taken place between us, and on
the day before his death I made a full and free confession
to him."
It was evident from Sir Charles Russell's manner when he
rose to make his final appeal that Mrs. Maybrick had made her
statement against his wish, but he still fought valiantly in
her cause, and urged that if it had not been for the act of
infidelity on her part there could be no motive assigned in the
case, and surely, he declared, there was a wide difference
between the grave moral guilt of unfaithfulness and the
criminal act involved in the deliberate plotting, by such
wicked means, the felonious death of her husband. He closed
his eloquent and brilliant appeal by putting two questions to
the jury : —
1. Was there clear, safe and satisfactory unequivocal
proof that death was in fact caused by arsenical poisoning ?
2. Had the accused woman administered that poison, if to
the poison the death of her husband was due ?
On the eighth day of the trial the judge summed up the
evidence and the jury retired at 3.15, and had barely been
absent thirty-eight minutes when they returned to the court
with the verdict of " Guilty."
On being asked by the clerk if she had anything to say, Mrs.
Maybrick replied " I have been found guilty, but excepting
my moral fault I am not guilty." The judge then passed
sentence of death.
The sentence aroused considerable feeling and the country
was divided into two parties, one protesting that Mrs. Maybrick
[Copyright.
BOTTLE OF MEAT JUICE AND A BOTTLE CONTAINING MEAT
JUICE AND WATER EXHIBITED IN THE MAYBRICK CASE.
THE MAYBRICK CASE 313
was innocent, and the other that she was guilty. An agitation
was at once made for a reprieve, which ended in a respite
being granted and the sentence being commuted to penal
servitude for life.
For some years afterwards efforts were continually made
to secure Mrs. Maybrick's release, and successive Home Secre-
taries investigated the circumstances of the case, but always
decided the conviction must stand. Sir Charles Russell
frequently affirmed his belief in Mrs. Maybrick's innocence,
and attributed the jury's verdict to his remarks upon the
moral aspect of the case, and even after he became Lord Chief
Justice of England he stated his personal belief that she was
not guilty.
The late Lord Moulton, who was an eminent scientist as well
as a great lawyer, took a deep interest in this case, and in a
letter to the writer, written in 1899, stated :
" The point of interest was one of evidence as to the cause
of death. I have always been of opinion that — taking into
consideration the fact that the deceased was an arsenic- eater
— there was no evidence that he was poisoned. The weight
of the medical testimony was in favour of that view, but that
was not the main point. In my opinion the testimony for
the prosecution entirely failed to support the onus which lay
upon it. The witnesses could not point out anything incon-
sistent with non-poisoning."
" This case," says Sir William Willcox, " is interesting
from the fact that the proof of fatal poisoning rested on the
presence of 0'049 grain of arsenic in the liver, the minimum
fatal dose being about two grains."
Whether Mrs. Maybrick did actually administer arsenic
to her husband with intent to kill him she alone could tell.
On her own confession she admitted having given him a
certain white powder for which he craved, of the nature of
which, however, she said she was ignorant. There can be no
doubt this powder was arsenic. If she did not know the
powder was arsenic and did not give it with intent to kill
him, then surely such a web of circumstantial evidence has
never before been woven round one accused of having com-
mitted a terrible crime.
CHAPTER X
THE LAMBETH POISON MYSTERIES
TOWARDS the close of the year 1891 and the early part
of 1892, public interest was excited by the mysterious
deaths of several young women of the " unfortunate class "
residing in the neighbourhood of Lambeth. The first case
was that of a girl named Matilda Clover, who lived in Lambeth
Road. On the night of October 20, 1891, she spent the evening
at a music-hall in company with a man, who returned with her
to her lodgings about nine o'clock. Shortly afterwards she
was seen to go out alone, and she purchased some bottled beer,
which she carried to her rooms. After a little time the man
left the house.
At three o'clock in the morning the inmates of the house
were aroused by the screams of a woman, and on the landlady
entering Matilda Clover's room, she found the unfortunate
girl lying across the bed in the greatest agony. Medical aid-
was sent for, and the assistant of a neighbouring doctor saw
the girl, and judged she was suffering from the effects of drink.
He prescribed a sedative mixture, but the girl got worse, and,
after a further convulsion, died on the following morning.
The medical man whose assistant had seen her on the previous
night, gave a certificate that death was due to delirium tremens
and syncope, and Matilda Clover was buried at Tooting.
A few weeks afterwards a woman called Ellen Donworth,
who resided in Duke Street, Westminster Bridge Road, is
stated to have received a letter, in consequence of which she
went out between six and seven in the evening. About eight
o'clock she was found in Waterloo Road in great agony, and
died while she was being conveyed to St. Thomas's Hospital.
Before her death she made a statement that a man with a
dark beard and wearing a high hat had given her " two drops
314
THE LAMBETH POISON MYSTERIES 315
of white stuff " to drink. In this case a post-mortem examina-
tion was made, and on analysis both strychnine and morphine
were found in the stomach, proving that the woman had been
poisoned.
These cases had almost been forgotten, when some six
months afterwards, attention was again aroused by the
mysterious deaths of two girls named Alice Marsh and Emma
Shrivell, who lodged in Stamford Street. On the evening of
April II, 1892, a man, whom one of the girls in her dying
testimony called " Fred " and whom she described as a doctor,
called to see them, and together they partook of tea. The
man stayed till 2 a.m., and during the evening gave them both
" three long pills."
Half an hour after the man left the house, both girls were
found in a dying condition. While they were being removed
to the hospital Alice Marsh died in the cab, and Emma Shrivell
lived for only six hours afterwards. The result of an analysis
of the stomach and organs revealed the fact that death in
each case had been caused by strychnine.
There was absolutely no evidence beyond the vague descrip-
tion of the man for the police to work upon, and this case,
like the others with which at first it was not connected,
seemed likely to remain among the unsolved mysteries ;
when by the following curious chain of circumstances, the
perpetrator of these cold-blooded crimes was at last brought
to justice.
Some time after the deaths of the two girls Marsh and
Shrivell, a Dr. Harper, of Barnstaple, received a letter, in
which the writer stated that he had indisputable evidence
that the doctor's son, who had recently qualified as a medical
practitioner in London, had poisoned two girls— Marsh and
Shrivell — and that he, the writer, required £1,500 to suppress
it. Dr. Harper placed this letter in the hands of the police,
with the result that on June 3, 1892, a man named Thomas
Neill, or Neill Cream, was arrested on the charge of sending a
threatening letter. He was brought up at Bow Street on this
charge several times, during which it transpired that in the
preceding November a well-known London physician had also
received a letter, in which the writer declared that he had
evidence to show that the physician had poisoned a Miss
3i6 POISON MYSTERIES
Clover with strychnine, which evidence he could purchase
for £2,500, and so save himself from ruin.
Neill Cream was remanded, and in the meanwhile the
body of Matilda Clover was exhumed, and the contents of
the stomach sent to Dr. Stevenson, one of the Government
analysts, for examination. He discovered the presence of
strychnine, and came to the conclusion that some one had
administered a fatal dose to her.
An inquest was then held on the body of Matilda Clover,
with the result that Thomas Neill, or Neill Cream, was com-
mitted on the charge of wilful murder.
The man's lodgings were searched after his arrest, and
a curious piece of paper was discovered, on which, written in
pencil in his handwriting, were the initials " M. C." and
opposite to them two dates, and then a third date, viz. October
20, which was the date of Matilda Clover's death. On the
same paper, in connection with the initials " E. S.," was also
found two dates, one being April 11, which was the date of
Emma Shrivell's death. There was also found in his possession
a paper bearing the address of Marsh and Shrivell, and it
was afterwards proved that he had said on more than one
occasion that he knew them well.
In his room a quantity of small pills was discovered, each
containing from one-sixteenth to one-twenty-second of a
grain of strychnine, also fifty-four other bottles of pills, seven
of which contained strychnine, a pocket medicine case, and
a bottle containing one hundred and sixty-eight pills, each
containing one-twenty-second of a grain of strychnine. These,
it is supposed, he obtained as an agent for the Harvey Drug
Co., of America. It was found he had purchased a quantity
of empty gelatine capsules from a chemist in Parliament
Street, which there is little doubt he had used to administer
a number of the small pills in a poisonous dose.
Thomas Neill, or Neill Cream, was tried for the wilful
murder of Matilda Clover at the Central Criminal Court before
Mr. Justice Hawkins, on October 18, 1892, the trial lasting
five days.
It transpired that Cream, who had received some medical
education and styled himself a doctor, came to this country
from America on October i, 1891, and on arriving in London
t * 11 m »
l;: :r f^
iii] iiii St ' '
»$§m mm
iiiiiiiiiiii I I
[Copyright.
STETHOSCOPE AND POCKET MEDICINE CASE CARRIED
BY NEILL CREAM.
THE LAMBETH POISON MYSTERIES 317
first stayed at Anderton's Hotel; in Fleet Street. Shortly
afterwards he took apartments in Lambeth, and became
engaged to a lady living at Berkhampstead.
He was identified as having been seen in the company of
Matilda Clover, and also by a policeman as the man who
left the house in Stamford Street on the night that Marsh and
Shrivell were murdered.
Dr. Stevenson, who made the analysis of the body of
Matilda Clover on May 6, 1892, stated in his evidence that
he found strychnine in the stomach, liver, and brain, and
that quantitatively he obtained one-sixteenth of a grain of
strychnine from two pounds of animal matter. He also
examined the organs from the bodies of Alice Marsh and
Emma Shrivell. He found 639 grains of strychnine in the
stomach and its contents of Alice Marsh, and i'6 grain of
strychnine in the stomach and its contents, also 1-46 grain
in the vomit, and 0-2 grain in a small portion of the liver of
Emma Shrivell.
The jury, after deliberating for ten minutes, returned
a verdict of guilty, and Thomas Neill, or Neill Cream, as
he was otherwise known, was sentenced to death. He was
executed on November 15, 1892.
CHAPTER XI
SOME POISON MYSTERIES IN FRANCE
FOR centuries past poison has played a prominent part
in love intrigues which form so common a feature in
French life. Such crimes are generally incited by jealousy
or the desire to remove some obstacle that obstructs the path
of the ardent lover. A typical case of this character and one
which caused a great sensation at the time, occurred at
Bordeaux in 1906, when Madame Canaby was tried for
attempting to poison her husband. Monsieur and Madame
Canaby were people of good position and well known in
Bordeaux society. The arrest of the lady, therefore, caused
considerable interest. The story is somewhat remarkable.
Early in 1906 Monsieur Canaby was jtaken ill with influenza,
and on the 27th of that month his cook called at a pharmacy
in the city with a prescription which contained a large quantity
of aconite and digitalin, two very powerful, poisons. The
prescription was signed by a " Dr. Gaube." The pharmacist,
who happened to be the uncle of Madame Canaby, knew that his
niece and her husband were friendly with Dr. Gaube, who lived
some distance away from Bordeaux. His natural surprise
at the large quantity of the powerful poisons ordered was
somewhat allayed by a note which accompanied the pre-
scription, stating that Dr. Gaube required the poisons for
experimental purposes. M. Fouries, the pharmacist, then
wrote a note to his niece, whom he had not seen for three
years, explaining that although he had dispensed this pre-
scription he could not in future deliver such dangerous drugs
by a messenger. He further cautioned the servant, saying,
" Be careful ; there is enough there to poison thirty men ! "
On May i M. Erny, the pharmacist who usuaUy dispensed
for Madame Canaby, received a prescription for one gramme
318
SOME POISON MYSTERIES IN FRANCE 319
of digitalin, signed by Dr. Gaube, also accompanied by
a note similar to that presented to M. Fouries. This was
followed by another prescription on May 4 for one gramme of
aconitine and five centigrams of digitalin. Five days after-
wards a third prescription was presented for one gramme of
potassium cyanide and one gramme of digitalin, both of
which are extremely virulent poisons. The pharmacist's
suspicions now being aroused, he refused to dispense the
last prescription, and on May li he called on Dr. Guerin,
whom he knew to be attending M. Canaby, and showed him
the prescription. The following day Dr. Guerin called in
four physicians, and after a consultation it was decided to
remove M. Canaby to a private hospital under the charge of
Dr. Villar. Here, carefully watched, M. Canaby gradually
made some progress toward recovery.
Meanwhile, the doctors submitted the prescriptions to
Dr. Gaube, who at once pronounced them forgeries and lodged
a complaint with the Procureur of the Republic. A police
inquiry followed, and a search was made in the Canabys'
house, which resulted in the discovery of a large number of
empty bottles which had formerly contained Fowler's Solution
of Arsenic. An analysis being made of the hair of M. Canaby,
it revealed the presence of arsenic to the extent of forty
milligrams per kilo, and in hair from his beard twenty-six
milligrams.
The arrest of Madame Canaby quickly followed, and she was
committed for trial on the charge of attempting to poison her
husband. The motive for the cause was assigned to an
intimacy Madame had formed with a Monsieur Rabot, a friend
of the family.
At the trial M. Canaby, still weak and ill, was brought to
the Court and strongly affirmed his wife's innocence. He
stated his belief that a discharged servant had by means of
anonymous letters instigated the prosecution. He ascribed
the presence of arsenic in his beard to patent medicines
which he had been in the habit of taking in large doses.
M. Rabot, whose intimacy with Madame Canaby had given
rise to some scandal, denied that any improper relations
existed between him and the lady. The onus of proving
the case then rested with the medical men who had been in
320 POISON MYSTERIES
attendance on M. Canaby. Beyond a few explanations, how-
ever, they dedined to say anything, stating that they coald
not say more without betraying the secrets of their patients,
which professional usage forbade.
The President of the Court informed Dr. Villar, the chief
medical witness, that his refusal to speak would probably
tell against the prisoner.
" I will ask her to release you from your pledge," continued
the President.
" I want the truth to be told ; I don't want anyone to keep
silence on my account," broke in Madame Canaby.
" So now you can speak," remarked the President.
" Not at all," replied the doctor. "No one can release us
from our pledge of secrecy, and certainly not Madame Canaby,
who was not our patient."
" But every good citizen under pain of punishment is bound
to disclose any criminal act that is known to have been com-
mitted by another," said the President sharply.
" On the contrary," replied the witness, " the law punishes
those who violate professional secrecy and did so recently in
Paris. Even if we know an accused person guilty, we would
refuse to speak."
For the defence, evidence was adduced that M. Canaby was
in the habit of taking a certain patent, medicine that contained
arsenic. Of the three experts who were called to give an
opinion on the writing of the prescriptions, one declared the
writing resembled that of M. Rabot, while the others averred
that it was unquestionably that of Madame Canaby, who had
attempted to disguise her hand.
Madame herself declared that the poisons when received
had been handed to her by a fair young man, who came
presumably from Dr. Gaube, but as to his identity she could
trace nothing.
In the end, Madame Canaby was acquitted on the charge of
attempting to poison her husband, but was found guilty of
forging medical prescriptions, by which poison was fraudu-
lently obtained by her. For this she was sentenced to fifteen
months' imprisonment and a fine of a hundred francs.
Another strange case, the motive for which can only be
assigned to a disordered brain, happened in Varennes, a viUage
SOME POISON MYSTERIES IN FRANCE 321
near Saint Amand-Montroud. In April, 1905, a well-to-do
farmer named Gilbert died suddenly, and six months after-
wards his wife expired in a similar manner. In September of
the following year, another farmer in the same district, called
Renaud, died very suddenly, and within a month his wife
succumbed to a mysterious illness. In the meantime, one of
their farm labourers also died from an unexplained cause, and
a young "man, who was steward of a neighbouring chateau,
together with his little daughter, was likewise fatally attacked.
No suspicions of foul play were apparently aroused until a
considerable time afterwards, when Madame Fallot, a villager,
found a small cheese on her window-sill, which she took to
be a present from a neighbour. She ate some of it with her
lunch, and in less than three hours she was dead.
The origin of the cheese, which on analysis proved to be
strongly impregnated with arsenic, was traced to a young
married woman named Jeanne Gilbert, the daughter of the
farm.er Renaud and the daughter-in-law of M. and Mme
Gilbert, all of whom had died in a similar manner. She wa.s
arrested and charged with the murder of Madame Fallot.
M. Bouillot, a pharmacist of Saint Amand, was able to prove
from his poison register that Jeanne Gilbert had bought
arsenic by the half pound from him, stating that she required
it for poisoning rats on the farm, and she might have had
two pounds of the poison in her possession at one time.
Jeanne at first stoutly denied that she had purchased the
arsenic, and declared she did not even know the pharmacist.
Even when confronted with the jugc d'irstruction she con-
tinued her denials, but the pharmacist had been careful to
make her sign his register on the occasion of each purchase.
The judge required her to sign her name, with the result that
the identity of the writing was at once established.
When compared, the dates of sales and the deaths of the
woman's relatives practically corresponded. She subsequently
admitted the purchases of the arsenic, but adhered to her
original assertion that she used it for destroying rats. Alto-
gether, it is suspected that Jeanne Gilbert poisoned no fewer
than eleven persons.
The most extraordinary feature of the case was that she
appeared to have no possible motive for committing there
X
322 POISON MYSTERIES
terrible crimes, as she was comfortably settled in life. Her
parents were in good circumstances, and she could expect no
advantages, to accrue from their deaths, or that of her future
mother-in-law and the other persons she is believed to have
poisoned. The only explanation offered is the statement of
her husband that her mind may have been affected by an illness
after which he had noticed that she sometimes acted strangely.
A more recent case which excited great interest throughout
France was that of Henri Girard, who died in prison while
awaiting trial. About 1909 this individual, who passed as
an insurance agent, was living at Montreuil-sous-Bois. Well
educated, of good appearance, and apparently a cultured man
with a leaning towards music, literature and science, he soon
become popular among a wide circle in the district in which
he lived and also in Paris. Among his acquaintances was a
wealthy man named Pernotte, who after some persuasion
consented to have his life insured in two different companies
for a total sum of ;f8,400, which was to be payable to Girard
in case of Pernotte's death.
A short time afterwards all the members of Pernotte's
family were stricken with typhoid fever, but in the course
of time they recovered and went away for a holiday. On their
return, however, as M. Pernotte was still feeling weak, his
friend Girard, who claimed to have some medical knowledge
and was interested in science, gave him a hypodermic injection
which he said would speedily put him on his feet again.
Pernotte died soon afterwards, and the physicians who
examined the body declared that death resulted from poisoning.
Girard, it was afterwards discovered, made an entry in his
diary at this time as follows : " Poisons ; prepare bottle,
tubes, rubber gloves ; buy microbe books."
Police inquiries were set on foot and disclosed the fact
that Girard at this time was studying bacteriology, and had
actually boug:ht cultures of typhoid bacilli, and a selection of
toxic organisms and poisons were found at his house.
Meanwhile Girard calmly took possession of the £8,400
for which he had insured the life of M. Pernotte.
He appears to have been a man possessed of the most
extraordinary power of attraction for both men and women ;
his manners are said to have been charming, and the courtly
SOME POISON MYSTERIES IN FRANCE 323
tone of his conversation gave him the name among his acquain-
tance of " Gentleman Girard."
Once his intimate friends came within the sphere of his
magnetic personahty they seem to have surrendered their
wills entirely to his.
In 1913 he became very friendly with a M. Godel, and the
latter agreed, at the suggestion of Girard, to take out a joint
life insurance for ;f8,ooo. In case of the death of one, the
money was to go to the survivor. M. Godel after lunching
one day with Girard was taken ill with typhoid fever ; he
eventually recovered, but becoming suspicious, he refused to
see Girard again, to which decision he no doubt owed his life.
Girard was mobilized during the war and served in the
automobile service in Paris where he made the acquaintance
of a soldier called Delmas. Delmas became very friendly
with Girard, and, after having signed bills in favour of the
insurance agent, also took ill and developed typhoid fever.
He was sent, however, to a military hospital and recovered.
It is stated that Girard was experimenting with micro-
organisms and had bought quantities of typhoid cultures
from wholesale druggists. At this time, too, he fitted up a
bacteriological laboratory in the house of a woman with
whom he lived at Neuilly.
Finding that his efforts in using pathogenic organisms had
proved so uncertain in effects, he next turned his attention
to the study of poisonous fungi, and used the resulting poison
on his next victim, a M. Duroux, a post office employee, whose
life, as in the previous cases, he had insured for a large sum
without the latter's knowledge.
Having invited him to dine at his house, it was said that
he took the opportunity of placing the poison in his food.
The servants, it is alleged, were told not to wash up, and they
say that Girard and one of his mistresses washed the plates and
knives and forks in a bath full of antiseptic solution. Duroux,
however, was none the worse. Girard's notebook at this time
shows the following entry : " Mimiche Dinner — mushrooms,"
opposite the dates May 10 and 11, 1917. The dinner took
place on May 14. In December of the same year Duroux
twice went to a cafe with Girard and each time was taken
violently ill afterwards.
^^ POISON MYSTERIES
The next victim was a Madame Monin, a widow, with whom
Girard became very intimate. Having taken out four insur-
ance pohcies on her Hfe, he then decided to poison her. He
persuaded her to come to the house of his future wife, a Mile
Drouhin, to see some hats, and while Mme Monin was so
engaged, Girard offered her some refreshment and wine
was brought into the room. The hat having been selected,
the lady partook of a glass of wine handed to her by Girard,
which is said to have contained a poison he had prepared from
fungi specially for this purpose.
It acted very rapidly, as the unfortunate lady was taken
ill in the street almost directly afterwards, and after being
taken by two policemen to her home, she died three hours
later. A post-mortem examination revealed the fact that she
died from mushroom poisoning. Girard, however, was bold
enough to make a claim on the insurance policies, but owing
to the refusal of one of the companies to pay £400, the amount
of one policy which he had taken out with them on the life of
Mme Monin, he was arrested.
It was then discovered that two other insurance companies
had already handed over to Girard or his accomplices over
;£8oo without inquiries. Girard, as agent, having secured the
business in each case, had according to custom been paid the
first premium as his commission.
After his arrest, on his house being searched, in his laboratory,
which was completely equipped, were found a considerable
number cf poisons and a number of glass jars containing
typhoid cultures and other organisms. Inquiries revealed
other mysterious cases on which Girard had operated back
to 1913, and brought to light another, of a man whom
he had invited to dinner and who had, died after drinking an
aperitif which had been offered to him by Girard.
The preliminary legal investigation into this remarkable
series of crimes lasted nearly three years, and in the end
Girard was sent before the Chamber of Criminal Indictment,
but before the trial took place at the Paris Assizes death
had cheated the guillotine. Girard died in prison after he
had made, it is said, a full confession of his crimes.
CHAPTER XII
THE HORSFORD CASE
TOWARDS the close of the year 1897, a widow, called Mrs.
Holmes, was living with her three children at Stonely,
near Kimbolton. She had a cousin named Walter Horsford,
a well-to-do young farmer who occupied a farm at Spaldwick,
about twelve miles away, and who frequently came to Stonely
to visit her.
A romantic attachment eventually sprang up between them,
which resulted in a too intimate acquaintance.
After a while Horsford's affection began to wane, and in
the end he married another lady. Shortly afterwards Mrs.
Holmes left Stonely and took up her residence at St. Neots.
About December of the same year she wrote a letter to
Horsford, informing him of her condition, a piece of news
which appears to have greatly upset him, as he was in fear
the information might reach his wife.
On December 28 he called at a chemist's shop in Thrapstone,
a neighbouring town, and asked for a shilling's worth of
strychnine, some prussic acid, arsenic, and carbolic acid, which
he stated he required for poisoning rats. The chemist, to
whom he was a stranger, requested him to bring a witness,
which he did, and the chemist's poison register was duly signed
by Horsford and a man who introduced him. He took the
poisons, which consisted of ninety grains of strychnine, one
pound of arsenic, and some prussic acid and carbolic acid,
away with him.
About a week afterwards Mrs. Holmes received a letter
from Horsford. It was taken in by her daughter, who recog-
nized his handwriting, and the envelope is also supposed to
have contained two packets of strychnine.
On the evening of January 7, 1898, Mrs. Holmes retired to
325
326 POISON MYSTERIES
bed, apparently in her usual health, about half-past nine. The
only other persons in the house were her daughter Annie,
her son Percy, and her infant. The daughter noticed that
her mother took a glass of water upstairs with her, which was
an unusual circumstance. On going to her mother's bedroom
shortly afterwards, she found her suffering great pain, and
she saw the glass, now almost empty, standing on a chest of
drawers.
Percy Holmes ran out and called in the assistance of some
neighbours, and then went for a doctor. When medical
aid arrived, the unfortunate woman was in convulsions and
died shortly afterwards.
The day after her death the police searched the house, but
failed to find any trace of poison, and an inquest was held on
January 8, which Horsford was summoned to attend.
In his evidence before the coroner, he swore that he had
neither written to nor seen the deceased woman. The
medical evidence proved that death was caused by strychnine.
The inquest was adjourned for a week, and in the meanwhile
Mrs. Holmes was buried. From information received by the
police, a further search was made in the house, with the result
that two packets were discovered under the feather bed in
Mrs. Holmes's bedroom. One packet of buff-coloured paper
was found to contain about thirty-three grains of strychnine
in powder, on which was written the words, " One dose.
Take as told," in Horsford's handwriting. On the second
packet, the contents of which had been used, was written,
" Take in a little water. 'Tis quite harmless. Will come in
a day or two." This was also in Horsford's writing. A letter
was also found downstairs, presumably from Horsford, saying
he would come over on Friday to make arrangements, and
that he did not wish to write any more letters, as he did not
want his wife to know.
On January lo Walter Horsford was arrested on the charge
of perjury committed at the inquest, and it was resolved to
have another examination made of the body of the deceased
woman. On examination of further documents and letters
discovered by the police, the charge of wilful murder was added
to corrupt perjury against Horsford, and he was committed
for trial.
THE HORSFORD CASE 327
The trial began on June 2, 1898, at Huntingdon, before Mr.
Justice Hawkins, and lasted five days.
Evidence was given by Dr. Stevenson, scientific analyst
to the Home Ofiice, who stated that he had received and
analysed the contents of the stomach of the deceased woman.
He extracted 1-31 grains of strychnine, which was a dose fatal
to an adult. He detected no other poison. The buff-
coloured paper marked " One dose. Take as told," contained
33I grains of strychnine, and the other paper which presented
the appearance of having had the powder shaken out, had
a few minute crystals of strychnine adhering. In each case
it was the pure alkaloid.
On January 26 he made an examination of the exhumed
body of Mrs. Holmes. The fingers and lower limbs were
rigid. This was an unusual condition nineteen days after
death. He had observed one case like it before, and that
was the case of Matilda Clover, who was poisoned by Neill
Cream. He removed the brain, spinal cord, heart, lungs,
spleen and both kidneys and found strychnine in all the
organs analysed. There was no appearance of disease in the
vital organs. There could not have been less than 7 grains
taken, more likely 10 or 12 grains. 1-31 grain would be an
absolutely fatal dose for an average adult. In cases of
strychnine poisoning, death occurs about half an hour after
the beginning of the symptoms, and they come on about twenty
minutes after the poison has been taken. Six hours is the
extreme limit. The mind of a person suffering from strychnine
poisoning would be very apprehensive of death. Death was
caused in one of two ways — suffocation, by the muscles of the
chest becoming fixed, or after a spasm of exhaustion. He
could imagine no more terrible death.
He had examined some Dover's Powder found in the work-
box of Mrs. Holmes, but found no trace of strychnine.
He further stated that if strychnine were poured off a paper
he would expect to find a few crystals adhering to the surface
of the paper. If a person took strychnine in water the greater
part would go down to the bottom of the glass as sediment.
What was drunk would be the portion floating on the top.
Mr. Anderson, the medical practitioner called in to attend
Mrs. Holmes, described her condition when he saw her. His
328 POISON MYSTERIES
opinion was that she was suffering from tetanus caused by
strychnine poisoning. The convulsions were of a tetanic
character and the spasms succeeded each other in rapid
succession.
A speciaHst in handwriting was then called, who said that
having compared the letter from Horsford in which he spoke
about the " arrangements " with the two papers marked
" Take in a little water. 'Tis quite harmless " and " One dose,
take as told," he came to the conclusion they were in the same
handwriting, and in his opinion the handwriting was natural
and there had been no attempts to disguise it.
Mr. Wild, for the defence, said there was no proof that the
prisoner administered the poison and there was no motive for
the crime. What evidence was there that the prisoner ever
sent poison to the deceased ? Everything in the case, he
contended, depended upon the handwriting, and he urged that
some of the handwriting produced as that of the prisoner was
utterly unreliable.
The judge, in summing up, told the jury that if anyone
wilfully caused another to take a deadly poison, whether
intending to kill or not, and death resulted thereby, it was
murder.
The question of handwriting was of vital importance, and it
had not been shown that there was any single other soul in the
neighbourhood who was interested in the deceased woman's
death, or who wrote in a hand like that of the prisoner. He
enjoined them to remember these things and to deal with the
case according to the evidence, and return the verdict which
the evidence compelled them.
The jury returned at 1.20 p.m., after deliberating for twenty
minutes, with a verdict of " Guilty," and sentence of death
was passed.
Horsford was hanged at Cambridge Gaol on June 28, 1898,
and before he died made a full confession of his crime.
CHAPTER XIII
AMERICAN POISON MYSTERIES
ONE of the most carefully planned murders by means
of poison in modern times was investigated at the trial
of Roland B. Molineux, who was charged with causing the
death of Mrs. Catherine J. Adams in New York in 1899.
On November 10, 1898, Mr. Henry C. Barnett, a produce
broker, who was a member of the Knickerbocker Athletic
Club, one of the most prominent social organizations in New
York, received by post at the club a sample box of Kutnow's
Powder. He was in the habit of taking this and similar
preparations for simple ailments, and soon after receiving the
box he took a dose of its contents. He became ill immedi-
ately afterwards, and was thought to be suffering from diph-
theria. That he had a slight attack of this disease there is
little doubt, as the fact was proved from a bacteriological
examination made by his medical attendant. He left his bed
earlier than the doctor advised, and died presumably of heart
failure.
The contents of the box, however, were examined, which
led to the discovery that the powder had been tampered with
and mixed with cyanide of mercury, and although Mr.
Barnett had died from natural causes, it seemed clear that
an attempt had been made to poison him by some one who
knew he was in the habit of taking this powder. The investi-
gation, however, does not appear to have been carried further.
The next chapter in the story occurred in connection with
a Mr. Harry Cornish, who occupied the position of physical
director to the Knickerbocker Athletic Club.
A day or two before Christmas in the same year, a packet
directed to him was delivered by post at his address. It
contained a box in which, on opening, he found at one end a
329
330 POISON MYSTERIES
silver article for holding matches and toothpicks ; at the other
end was a bottle labelled " Emerson's Bromo-seltzer," and
between the two was packed some soft tissue paper.
Mr. Cornish was at first under the impression that some
one had sent him the packet as a present. After removing
the articles from the box, he threw it and the wrapper into
his wastepaper basket, but on second thoughts he cut the
address from the wrapper and kept it.
The bottle, labelled "Bromo-seltzer," which is a saline
preparation well known in America, was sealed over the top
and bore the usual revenue stamp. After tearing off the out-
side wrapper, Mr. Cornish placed the bottle and the silver
holder on his desk.
On the following Sunday he remarked to his aunt, Mrs.
Catherine Adams, that he had received a present. Mrs.
Adams and her daughter, Mrs. Rogers, joked him about it,
saying he must have some admirer, and was afraid to bring
his present home, as the sender's name was probably on it.
On Tuesday night Mr. Cornish took the bottle and the
silver holder home with him, and presented them to Mrs.
Rogers, saying they were no use to him and she might have
them.
The next morning Mrs. Adams complained of a headache,
and her daughter suggested a dose of the Bromo-seltzer. Mr.
Cornish was present, and mixed a teaspoonful of the prepara-
tion from the bottle with a glass of water, and gave it to his
aunt. After drinking it she at once exclaimed, " My, how
bitter that is ! "
" Why, that's all right ! " said Mr. Cornish, as he took a
drink from the glass.
A few moments afterwards Mrs. Adams collapsed, and died
within a short time. Mr. Cornish was seized with violent
vomiting, which doubtless saved his life, and he recovered.
A post-mortem examination revealed the fact that Mrs.
Adams had died from cyanide poisoning, and on the bottle
of Bromo-seltzer being analysed the contents were found
to have been mixed with cyanide of mercury.
For a long time the affair seemed a complete mystery, and
the police investigations appeared likely to be fruitless. Then
the particulars of the death of Mr. Barnett, who was Chairman
AMERICAN POISON MYSTERIES 331
of the House Committee of the Knickerbocker Club, were
brought to light ; and connecting them with the fact that Mr.
Cornish was also a prominent member of the club, and had
received the bottle of Bromo-seltzer by post in the same
manner, it seemed highly probable that both the poisoned
packets which contained cyanide of mercury had been sent
by the same person.
Further examination proved that the bottle used was not
a genuine Bromo-seltzer one, and that the label had been
removed from a genuine bottle and carefully pasted on that
sent to Mr. Cornish.
A firm of druggists in Cincinnati then came forward and
stated that, as far back as May 31, 1898, they had received a
written application signed " H. C. Barnett " for a sample box
of pills, and another similar application on December 21, 1898,
which was signed " H. Cornish."
Both these applications were found to be in the same hand-
writing, which was also strikingly similar to the address on
the packet sent to Mr. Cornish, which he had fortunately
kept. The address given by the applicant who called himself
" H. C. Barnett," was 257, West Forty-second Street, New
York, a place where private letter-boxes are rented for callers.
The address given by the applicant signing himself " H.
Cornish," was a similar place at 1,620, Broadway, in the same
city. From these facts it seemed evident that an attempt
had been made to poisjn both Barnett and Cornish by some
one who knew them, and the poisoner had concealed his
identity by employing the names of his intended victimS:
The nature of the poison used, cyanide of mercury, was
also a slight clue, as it is a substance which is not used in
medicine and must in all probability have been specially
prepared for the purpose by some one with a knowledge
of chemistry.
At the coroner's inquest, which began on February 9, 1899,
certain facts were elicited that tended to bring suspicion on
Roland B. Molineux, who was also a member of the Knicker-
bocker Club and well acquainted with Barnett and Cornish.
He was also known to have quarrelled with the latter. At
the close of the inquest Molineux was arrested and removed
to the Tombs prison.
332 POISON MYSTERIES
Owing to legal technicalities in the original indictment,
which charged him with the murder of both Mr. Barnett and
Mrs. Adams, he was twice liberated, and then for the third
time arrested.
The trial of Molineux for the murder of Mrs. Adams was a
memorable one, and lasted nearly three months. It began on
November 14, 1899, at the Central Criminal Court, New York,
and was not concluded till February 11, 1900.
The evidence was entirely circumstantial. Most of the
experts in handwriting who were examined declared that
the address on the packet sent to Mr. Cornish was in Moli-
neux's handwriting, and that he had also written both applica-
tions to the druggists in Cincinnati. Further, Molineux was
engaged as a chemist to a colour factor}^ in which cyanide of
mercury was used, which would enable him either to make or
procure that special poison, from which only three other fatal
cases had been recorded.
No witnesses were called for the defence, and the jury
found Roland B. Molineux guilty of " murder in the first
degree," which, according to American law, is murder with
premeditation.
In January, 191 1, a mysterious case that for some time baffled
the united exertions of the police occurred in Cumberland,
Maryland, U.S.A. On Christmas Eve of 1910, the night before
their wedding, a Mr. Trigg and Miss Grace Loeser, who were
well known in Maryland, were found sitting together in an
upright position on a sofa in the drawing room of Miss Loeser 's
home, both apparently dead. An hour before they were thus
discovered, Mrs. Loeser had seen them sitting exactly in
the same position, full of life and animation and talking over
the arrangements for their wedding on the following day.
Returning an hour later, she found them still both sitting in
the same position but lifeless. Nothing was found in the room
to indicate the cause of death.
Before the ghastly discovery Mrs. Loeser had heard them
laughing and talking in the drawing-room ; then she heard
the telephone bell ring, and heard her daughter go to it and
speak to a friend at the other end of the wire about the final
arrangements for the wedding.
AMERICAN POISON MYSTERIES 333
A doctor who was immediately summoned and examined the
bodies, noticed that the lips of both the man and the woman
were burned, and in the mouth of the man was found a piece
of chewing-gum, which he believed might contain poison.
According to the doctor, Mr. Trigg had apparently taken
poison and then kissed his fiancee and poisoned her in doing so.
A post-mortem examination was held and revealed traces
of potassium cyanide in the organs of both young people,
but how the poison came to be swallowed there was nothing
to indicate, beyond the fact that the tongues of both were
burned and there was a larger quantity of the poison found
in the stomach of Trigg.
The chewing-gum habit is very common in America and a
package of it with one stick missing and the wrapper on the
floor, was found in Mr. Loeser's bedroom. The questions that
arose were : was the chewing-gum the cause of death, and had
they divided the one stick missing from the packet between
them, and if the gum was poisoned why had they thus decided
to take their lives ? >
Mrs. Loeser protested against the theory of suicide as being
beyond all reason, as both young people were absolutely
devoted to one another and had never even quarrelled.
A younger sister of Miss Loeser's, to whom Mr. Trigg is
said to have first paid attentions before he became engaged
to Grace Loeser, in giving evidence said that she also had
symptoms of cyanide poisoning. She was upstairs when Trigg
came to the house that afternoon, and the first she knew of the
tragedy was her mother screaming. She swore that she had
no poison in her possession, and had never heard of hydrocyanic
acid before her sister's death.
Mrs. Loeser when brought to the court to give evidence,
was practically in a state of collapse, but she swore that no
poison of any kind was kept in the house and that both her
daughters were on friendly terms.
Dr. Foard, the medical man first called in, described how
he found the young couple sitting upright together on the
sofa ; the woman was breathing stertorously, with her teeth
clenched and the pupils of her eyes dilated. A slight froth
issued from her lips, all of which, said the doctor, were
symptomatic of hydrocyanic acid or cyanide poisoning.
334 POISON MYS^TERIES
Dr. Broadrup, another medical practitioner, corroborated
Dr. Foard's statements. When he visited the house he was
called upstairs to see Miss May Loeser, who was in her room, and
when he got there he found the bedroom was full of a strong
odour of gas.
The evidence went to prove that Trigg at the last moment
did not wish to carry out the marriage with Miss Loeser, and
it was suggested that he may have poisoned her with the
chewing-gum, only swallowing a small portion himself in the
belief that he would easily have survived the effects.
At the coroner's inquiry, it was stated that cyanide of
potassium was found in the chewing-gum, and the jury
returned a verdict that both persons had died of cyanide
poisoning '" administered in an unknown manner."
Another mysterious case which aroused great interest in
America, concerned the death of a millionaire pork-packer,
and the arrest of his wife, on the charge of attempting to
. murder her husband.
This lady is said to have begun life as a country waif ; at
the age of twenty she became a waitress and married the man
whom she was accused of attempting to murder. It appears
that the marriage was bitterly opposed by the husband's
family on account of her social position, which placed a
stumbling-block between them and the position they aspired
to attain, and since the marriage her brother-in-law was said
to have been her greatest enemy.
It was alleged, that the wife not only made her husband iUby
giving him small doses of poison by placing it in his medicine,
but also in the water that she gave him to drink during the
night in his sick-room.
The chief witness against the accused was the nurse who
attended her husband during his illness. She said that
despite the wife's lowly origin she was greatly beset by social
ambitions. She wished to shine in the best Virginia society,
and her husband stood in the way. She had always showed
considerable animus against her husband's family, and told
the nurse that when he died, she was to search his pockets and
get the keys, especially those of his despatch box, as she did not
want the family to get them.
AMERICAN POISON MYSTERIES 335
The nurse said the accused consulted two fortune-tellers,
and informed her, that both of them told her that her husband
could not live until Christmas. She showed little attention
to him while he was ill, and he had complained to her that the
water given to him to drink had an unusual taste ; he said
it made him sick, and when she drank a glass of the water in
the room, to see if it was all right, she too became ill.
Suspicions being aroused, the sick man was removed to a
hospital, which his wife declared was a plan of the family to
get her husband out of her influence.
According to the prosecution, the wife's motive for getting
rid of her husband was her admiration for a shop-assistant
in the town in which they resided, and this man was caUed
as a witness for the prosecution. From his account the lady
must have conceived an extraordinary infatuation for him,
loading him with presents such as fur-lined coats, silver cigar
boxes, embroidered vests, dressing-gowns and other things
of considerable value.
It transpired later that, owing to the suspicions of the family,
they arranged for a female detective to be employed in the
house as a nurse. This person was instructed to win the
confidence of the wife and endeavour to find out what was
wrong.
At the trial she declared, that while in the house the accused
had offered her a thousand pounds to give her husband a
poisoned pill. She also stated that the accused frequently cried
and made no secret that she wished "that man would die,"
and declared again and again, every time she received news from
the bedside that he was worse, that she was the happiest of
women and prayed night and morning that she should be
awakened in the morning by a telephone call announcing
that her husband was dead.
She once asked her, " How much would you take to do it ? "
" I told her," continued the detective, " that I was a poor
woman, but said I would do it for a thousand pounds if she
prepared the poison." She replied, " I haven't a thousand
pounds, but I could get the poison, and if you will give it to
him I will give you two hundred pounds in cash, and when he
is dead and the estate comes to me I will give you the other
eight hundred."
336 POISON MYSTERIES
The detective said she agreed to this but insisted on a promise
in writing, so that she could demand the eight hundred pounds
afterwards. The accused said she would be afraid to give
anything in writing, for it might fall into the hands of her
brother-in-law and would certainly delight him, but she
afterwards promised to do so and said, " I will get the poison
and I will meet you outside the hospital at eleven o'clock
to-morrow morning and bring it with me. You are on night
watch and you can put it in his medicine when he is half asleep ;
or if you don't want to do that, just leave his medicine by the
bedside and tell him when the time comes to take it. He will
take the poison himself." She asked her to let her know the
instant her husband died, so that she could get possession of
her husband's body.
A doctor who was called, stated that the accused had bought
an ounce of sugar of lead from him, and afterwards came to
him for a solution of arsenic, which he refused.
For the defence, counsel asserted that the husband had
suffered from severe pains for some months and called in his
medical man, who said that his condition was consistent with
ptomaine poisoning.
After a trial lasting m.ore than a fortnight the jury con-
sidered for over twenty-four hours, but were unable to agree ;
they were then discharged, and the case collapsed,
CHAPTER XIV
THE SOUTHWARK POISON MYSTERY
IN the last week of July, 1902, a girl named Maude
Marsh, about twenty years of age, was admitted as a
patient into Guy's Hospital suffering from internal inflam-
mation and vomiting. She was placed under treatment, and in
a few weeks' time her condition so improved that she was
discharged from the institution. She was employed as a
barmaid at The Crown, a licensed house in the Borough High
Street. There she passed as the wife of the proprietor, with
whom she lived. About a month after her return to The
Crown she was again seized with a similar illness, and was
attended by a local medical practitioner and also seen by a
medical man from Croydon who had visited her at her father's
request. The former was told by the sick girl that the doctor
at Guy's Hospital thought she was suffering from peritonitis,
but after visiting her several times he came to the conclusion
she was suffering from inflammation of the stomach and
bowels. On calling to see his patient on the afternoon of
October 22, the doctor was told she had died two or three
hours earlier. He refused to give a certificate and insisted on
a post-mortem examination. The examination failed to
reveal the cause of death, and the doctor removed certain
internal organs and submitted them for analysis. In con-
sequence of the report he received, he then communicated
with the police.
On October 25 South London was gaily decorated in honour
of the State procession of the King and Queen, and the streets
were thronged with people. Shortly before the royal pro-
cession was due to pass through the Borough High Street, two
detectives entered The Crown public-house, which was
festooned with flags, and 'passed into the bar. A notice
337 Y
338 POISON MYSTERIES
on the wall announced seats to let to view the pageant,
and the windows were already filled with sightseers, who
took no notice of the two men who had entered so
quietly.
Behind the bar was the landlord, a small, dark-complexioned
man with prominent cheek-bones and sallow skin.
" Are you George Chapman ? " asked one of the detectives.
" Yes," was the reply.
" I am an inspector of police and wish to speak to you
quietly."
Chapman motioned the detectives towards the billiard-
room at the rear and the three men entered together.
" Maude Marsh, who has been living with you as your wife,
has been poisoned with arsenic," said Detective-Inspector
Godley at once.
" I know nothing about it ; I do not know how she got the
poison. She has been in Guy's Hospital for the same sort of
sickness," replied Chapman.
Chapman was asked to accompany the inspector to the
police station, where he was detained pending inquiries, and
at 10.15 that night he was formally charged with the wilful
murder of Maude Marsh.
When the accused man quietly took his place in the dock at
the police court the following morning, no one could imagine
that the curtain was about to be withdrawn from a series of
murders which for sheer heartlessness are almost unpre-
cedented in the annals of crime.
The only witness was Inspector Godley, who gave but
sufficient evidence to obtain a remand pending the inquest.
He stated that from inquiries he had made, he had found that
Chapman was the only person who had fed the girl, and that
he would not allow anyone else to give her food or to go into
the kitchen when it was being prepared. He found five
books, aU dealing with medicine, in the possession of the
accused, and also some white powders which had not yet been
analysed. Arsenic, however, had been discovered in a portion
of the viscera which had been removed from the body of Maude
Marsh at the time of the post-mortem. The doctor who had
attended Chapman's former wife during her fatal illness had
been called in to attend Maude Marsh, and he had noticed
THE SOUTHWARK POISON MYSTERY
339
Chap-
that both women had displayed the same symptoms,
man was then remanded.
Meanwhile, a further examination of the body was made by
Dr. Stevenson, the official analyst to the Home Office, the
result of which was given at his next appearance before the
magistrate. He stated that he found no evidence of natural
disease to account for death.
" Was arsenic suggested to you as the cause of death[? "
asked the solicitor who prosecuted on behalf of the Treasury.
" Yes, but I suggested to the other doctors present I did
not think arsenic had been the cause," replied Dr. Stevenson.
" I attributed it to another metallic poison, antimony, which I
found in the stomach and its contents, the liver, the spleen, the
kidneys, the brain and elsewhere in the following quantities : —
Metallic Antimony
In the stomach
„ „ abdomen
„ ,, liver
„ „ kidneys
>» >>
brain
0-23 grams.
5*99 »
071 „
0-14 „
0-17 „
Total 7-24 grains
Tartar Emetic.
In the stomach
. 0-64 grains
„ „ abdomen
. 16-64 »
,, ,, liver
. 1-98 „
„ „ kidneys
. 0-39 „
„ „ brain .
. 0-47 „
Total . 20-12 grains.
" In every organ and tissue that I examined I found some
antimony," added Dr. Stevenson.
He further stated that two grains of antimony had been
known to produce fatal results in a very weak person, but in
the case of an ordinary person, fifteen grains would kill. In
the case of repeated doses three grains taken at a time might
be expected to result in death. From the position of some
of the antimony he thought a dose was taken within a few
hours of death. Dr. Stevenson said he received from the
police over thirty articles, including pills and ordinary medicines.
340 POISON MYSTERIES
and analysed them, but found neither arsenic nor antimony
in any but one. This bottle was apparently empty when he
received it, but he found there were a few drops of a liquid
in it and looking into it he saw a little bit of white powder
sticking to the side. He rinsed the bottle out with water and
then analysed it and found the water contained both bismuth
and antimony.
At this stage the case was adjourned ; meanwhile the
coroner's inquest on the body of Maude Marsh was concluded,
which resulted in a verdict of wilful murder against Chapman.
When he was brought before the magistrate for the tenth
time on December 31, 1902, the Counsel for the Treasury had
the sensational announcement to make that Chapman had since
his last appearance been further charged with the murder of
two other women, viz. Mary Isabella Spink (or Chapman) on
Christmas Day, 1897, and Bessie Taylor (or Chapman) on
February 13, 1901.
These two women, said the counsel, had lived with him
for some time prior to their deaths. It had also been
discovered that the prisoner's real name was Severino
Klosowski, and that he had assumed the name of George
Chapman since coming to live in Etigland. He was a Polish
Jew and had studied medicine and surgery in Warsaw.
The story of Klosowski's life is an extraordinary one. He
was born in 1865 and educated at a military school in Poland.
Afterwards he became a male nurse in a hospital at Warsaw
and learned something of medicine. In 1888 he emigrated
to England and obtained work in a small barber's shop in
Whitechapel Road, London. After he had been in London
about twelve months, he married a woman named Lucy
Baderski, who was then living. At one time they went to
America, but she returned alone, and does not appear to have
lived with him again.
In 1895 he left Whitechapel and was next heard of in a
barber's shop at Tottenham, where he was recognized by a
hairdresser's traveller who had known him in Warsaw. He
next started a small shop on his own account, and at this
time was living with a girl called Annie Chapman, whose
name he afterwards adopted. His business failing, he again
took a situation in Church Lane, Leytonstone, where he earned
THE SOUTHWARK POISON MYSTERY 341
thirty shillings a week. While living at Leytonstone in 1895
he became acquainted with a Mrs. Spink, whose husband
deserted her. Klosowski, or Chapman, as he now called him-
self, became on intimate terms with Mrs. Spink, and after a
time he informed a Mr. Ward with whom he lodged that he and
Mrs. Spink were going to be married. One day in October,
1895, they went out, and on their return stated that the
wedding had taken place, and afterwards lived together as
husband and wife.
Mrs. Spink had about £560, which was vested in a trust
deed, and while she lived with Chapman some £250 had been
advanced to her by the trustee. In 1897 the balance was
handed over to the couple and they left London for Hastings,
where Chapman purchased a barber's business in George
Street.
About February, 1897, Chapman's affection for his wife
seemed to wane, as he is said to have treated her cruelly, and
she complained of his treatment to people they knew. Then
she became ill, suffering from irritation of the stomach, which
resulted in great weakness and depression. In April of that
year Chapman is known to have purchased an ounce of tartar
emetic (tartarated antimony) from a chemist in Hastings.
In August they left Hastings and took a beerhouse called The
Prince of Wales in Bartholomew Square, St. Luke's, London.
Mrs. Chapman, who had been better for a time, again became ill
with the same symptoms, and her husband is said to have
recommenced his ill-treatment of her. As she grew worse, a
Dr. Rogers was called in to see her. Here a Mrs. Doubleday
came upon the scene, and she noticed that Chapman frequently
felt his wife's pulse, and was much occupied in consulting
medical books. He prepared her food and also her medicine,
sending every one out of the room while he did it. She
suffered terrible pain with vomiting and diarrhoea and finally
died on Christmas Day, 1897. The doctor appears to have
had no suspicion of poison and gave a certificate that the cause
of death was phthisis.
After her death Chapman advertised for a barmaid and
eventually engaged a woman named Bessie Taylor in that
capacity. She came from Cheshire and had been in a situation
as housekeeper at Peckham before coming to Chapman at
342 POISON MYSTERIES
Easter in 1898. She told a friend she was going to be married
before going to live with Chapman at The Prince of Wales.
In August, 1898, they left London and went to live at Bishop
Stortford, where Chapman took an inn called The Grapes.
In March, 1899, the couple again returned to London, Chapman
first becoming tenant of The Monument, a public-house in
Union Street Borough, and afterwards removing to The Crown
in High Street. A Miss Painter, a friend of Bessie Taylor's,
who called to see her at The Crown, noticed that Chapman
treated her with indifference and once even threatened her
with a revolver. Calling to see her on another occasion some
time later. Miss Painter found she was very ill and was troubled
with persistent vomiting. Chapman attended to her, cooking
her food and feeling her pulse.
In January Dr. Stoker, a local practitioner, was called
in to see the sick woman, and he attended her until her death
in February, 1901. The doctor had no suspicion she had been
poisoned and certified the cause of death as intestinal obstruc-
tion, vomiting and exhaustion. The bodies of both women
were exhumed under an order from the Home Secretary, and
an analysis was made in each case by Dr. Stevenson.
The analysis of various organs removed from the body of
Mary Isabella Spink revealed the presence of antimony in all
the viscera examined : — •
In the stomach .
. o-o8 grains
,, ,, intestines
. I-I5 ,,
„ ,, liver
. 2-42
„ „ kidneys .
. o-i8 „
Total 3-83 grains of tartarated
antimony
Dr. Stevenson remarked on the amazing preservation of the
body after being interred for five years. He found the head
and features were so well preserved that they were as little
altered as though only buried a day. This he attributed to
the preservative properties of antimony, which in sufficient
quantity practically mummified the body. He could find no
case like this on record, and he regarded it as unique. There
was no indication of phthisis, the cause of death being gastro-
enteritis caused by the administration of antimony.
THE SOUTHWARK POISON MYSTERY 343
The analysis of the body of Bessie Taylor also revealed the
presence of antimony in the following quantities : —
In the stomach and its contents 0-32 grains
„ „ intestines „ „ 23-43
„ „ liver .... 4'55
„ ,, kidneys . . . . 0-82 „
Total 29-12 grains of tartarated
antimony.
Taylor's body was also in a remarkably good state of
preservation after being buried twenty-one months, and
showed no appearance of recent disease, but signs of acute
non-ulcerative gastro-enteritis set up by antimony were
evident.
It was about eighteen months after Bessie Taylor's death
that Chapman engaged Maude Marsh as a barmaid at The
Monument public-house, and her illness and death, the story
of which closely resembles that of the other women with whom
Chapman had consorted, has been already related.
He was committed for trial on December 19, 1902, and was
arraigned before Mr. Justice Grantham at the Old Bailey on
March 16, 1903.
For the defence the counsel for the prisoner urged the
absence of motive for the crimes, and although he admitted
that antimony had been found in the bodies of the three women,
he asked if the methods of science were absolutely conclu-
sive ? There was, he contended, room for mistake unless such
evidence was accompanied by corroborative evidence of the
most powerful kind. There was no proof that Chapman had
antimony in his possession since 1897, and his behaviour had
been that of an innocent man.
The Solicitor-General, Sir Edward Carson, in his reply, said
that although the prisoner was indicted only with regard
to Maude Marsh's death, the cumulative evidence of the two
earlier murders was perhaps the most fatal testimony. One
woman after another was betrayed and abandoned, and aU
poisoned in the same way and with the same poison. Each
received the same " attention " on Klosowski's part during
their fatal illnesses. As to motive, the history of the man was
344 POISON MYSTERIES
one of unbridled, heartless, cruel lust. If a man were proved a
murderer, one need not look for motive, but if motive were
wanted in this case, it was easily to be found.
The judge, in summing up, said the case was unique from
three points of view, viz. legally, chemically and medically.
Chemically, it was unique by reason of the discovery which
it enabled Dr. Stevenson to make of the power of antimony
to preserve the tissues of the body in almost a perfect state
of embalmment ; from the legal point of view, because it was
the first time the antecedents of a prisoner had been investi-
gated in the way they had been in this case.
Medically, it was a sad reflection that a man who had only
been a hairdresser's assistant should be able to defy the doctors
of this country, and for years carry on a practice of this kind
without the slightest fear of being found out. The only
question for the jury to determine was by whom the
antimony was administered.
After a consultation of ten minutes, the jury returned a
verdict of guilty, the foreman adding " We are all agreed."
Klosowski, or Chapman, was then sentenced to death, and
paid the penalty of his crimes at Wandsworth Gaol on
April 7, 1903.
CHAPTER XV
SOME IRISH POISON MYSTERIES
A CURIOUS case with many unusual features was investi-
gated at Armagh in June, 1905, when two women named
Pearson and Black were charged with murdering Alice
Pearson, aged seventy-four, the mother-in-law of the former
and mother of the latter, insurance benefits being alleged as the
motive for the crime.
The case came to be investigated through the statement
of one of the women while she was in gaol. Sarah Pearson,
one of the accused, was arrested in Montreal while in prison,
and made a confession of the crime, implicating herself, her
husband and her sister-in-law. She said she bought three
pennyworth of strychnine in Armagh and mixed it with mashed
potatoes and eggs. When her mother-in-law was eating the
meal she said that it tasted sour and she did not like it. Both
she and her sister had also partaken of the food.
Evidence went to prove that systematic attempts were made
to kiU the old woman for the sake of the little money, some
forty pounds, which she possessed ; that Pearson and Black
had first tried metallic mercury, but eventually put strychnine
into the meal of potatoes and eggs which caused her death.
According to the evidence of a witness, one of the accused
women came to his house and said she had seen " Old
Alice's ghost," and added that her husband had dreamed
that his mother was going to die.
The analyst who made an examination of the organs said
that he discovered two hundred and ninety-six grains of pure
metallic mercury in the body and had not been able to trace
any record of a case where mercury in such large quantities
had been found in any human body. The mercury, however,
was not the cause of death and did not act as a poison while
345
346 POISON MYSTERIES
in a metallic state. He found one-seventh of a grain of
strychnine in the stomach, liver and kidneys and there was
little doubt that strychnine had been the cause of death.
The jury found Sarah Pearson guilty and she was sentenced
to death.
Perhaps one of the most curious defences to a charge of
poisoning that has ever been put forward in court, was that
advanced in a case which was tried in Ireland, where a
woman was charged with murdering her husband.
The victim was a farmer who was taken ill after eating
a supper prepared by his wife, which consisted of a poached
egg. He died, apparently from the effects of strychnine poison-
ing, the following morning.
A week later one of his daughters, a child of three, also died
from the effects of strychnine poisoning after drinking some
milk. A post-mortem examination was made on both bodies,
and led to the discovery of half a grain of strychnine in the
stomach of each.
At the trial, the counsel for the defence declared that
he could satisfy the jury that no human hand was laid upon
the egg eaten, from the moment it was broken in the pan until
it reached the deceased man. He contended that the poison
had fallen from the rafters, and accidentally dropped en the egg,
portions of which he could prove the accused woman had
also eaten. Her husband before he died had expressed this
view, and it was proved that some strychnine to poison rats
had been placed on the floor of the loft immediately above
the kitchen, and some of it had fallen from the rafters on
to the egg as it was being removed from the fire to the table.
Although the Crown contended this accident could not have
happened, the jury found the accused not guilty, and she
was discharged.
CHAPTER XVI
THE DEVEREUX CASE
IN 1905 a poisoning case of an unusual character was dis-
closed at the Central Criminal Court. On April 13 of
that year the attention of the police was called to a large tin
trunk that was found in a warehouse in Kensal Rise. Round
the trunk was a strap and an endeavour had been made to
seal it with wax. The lock was forced and the lid opened,
and in it was found another covering consisting of a number
of pieces of wood wedged tightly together, over which had
been placed a mixture of glue and boric acM, which made the
box absolutely air-tight.
On the wood covering being removed, three human bodies
were discovered beneath, which appeared to be those of a
woman and two children. The result of a post-mortem
examination and analysis of the organs showed that all three
had been poisoned with morphine. More than sufficient of
the poison had been administered to the woman for the pur-
pose of taking her life, and sufficient was found in the bodies
of the children to achieve the same result.
The body of the woman was identified as that of Beatrice
Ellen Maud Devereux, the wife of Arthur Devereux, a chemist
who lived at Milton Avenue, Harlesden, and the children
were found to be her twin boys.
The Devereuxs were married in London in 1898, and had
three children, the twin boys being born at Stroud, where the
family had moved in 1902. In 1904 they returned to London,
where Devereux became manager of a pharmacy at Kilburn.
In December Devereux took a flat at 60 Milton Avenue,
Stonebridge Park, stating that he wanted it only for six
months. There was another flat in the house which the
landlord, at his request, left empty.
347
348 POISON MYSTERIES
On the afternoon of January 28, Devereux made arrange-
ments for one of the boys to go to a day school in the neigh-
bourhood and on the evening of the same day Mrs. Devereux
was out shopping with her mother. They parted near Milton
Avenue, and she was never seen alive again by anyone outside
her own family. At the end of the following week Devereux
appears to have decided to dispose of a number of things in
the house, including a perambulator and women's clothing.
He gave out that his wife and the twins were away in the
country, and arranged for himself and the other boy to go into
lodgings in the Harrow Road. His belongings were removed
by a local firm, who at the same time undertook to ware-
house for him a large trunk which he said contained boxes
of chemicals.
Shortly after this, Devereux obtained a situation with a
chemist in Coventry, giving himself a reference in the name of
Taylor. Mrs. Devereux's mother, not having heard from her
daughter for a considerable time, and finding the house
in Milton Avenue empty, communicated with the police,
which led to inquiries and the discovery of the trunk at the
depository.
Devereux was arrested at Coventry and brought to London
on April 13. He made the following statement to the police : — •
"I, Arthur Devereux, hereby declare that one evening
towards the end of January or the beginning of February
last, after having been out for a few hours with my child
Stanley, I returned to find my wife and twins lying dead on
their beds, evidently, to my mind, having died from poisons
taken or administered. Rather than face an inquest I decided,
with a recent trial fresh in my mind, to conceal the bodies
in a trunk which I had had in my house for the past two
years. This I proceeded to do at once. I missed some
poisons — chloroform and morphine — which I always kept in
my writing-desk after leaving my last situation, in the event
of my wishing to end my own life rather than face starvation.
The room smelt strongly of chloroform, so I concluded that
my wife had administered it to herself and the children, and
probably also the morphine. I had had a violent quarrel
with her before going out, also many times quite recently
and during the past twelve months."
The autopsy revealed no signs of disease in any of the
THE DEVEREUX CASE 349
bodies, and death was supposed to have been caused by
asphyxiation.
Sir Thomas Stevenson, who examined the organs, said that
he found altogether in the internal organs, i"i2 grains of
morphine. In the case of the "children he found morphine in
small quantities which could not be accurately determined,
but he believed it to be orginally a fatal dose. In his opinion
all three of the persons had died of morphine poisoning.
There was no evidence of chloroform having been given.
After the police inquiry Devereux was committed for trial
on the capital charge, and the case was tried at the Central
Criminal Court on July 27, 1905.
The trial lasted for four days, the prisoner being defended
by Mr. Elliott, who urged that he was a man of weak mind,
and that, confronted by a crisis, was not likely to act like an
ordinary person. He commented on the fact that Devereux
had left traces of himself behind in London on going to
Coventry, which showed him if not as a cunning criminal, at
least as one who was free from the stain of murder. He also
commented on the lack of motive for the crime.
Mr. Matthews, who prosecuted for the Crown, endeavoured
to reconstruct the tragedy as he conceived it to have happened,
and fixed it as occurring on the night of Sunday, January 29.
He suggested that at supper time morphine was introduced
into the food of the unsuspecting Mrs. Devereux and children,
and on their going up to bed in a drowsy condition,
Devereux could have easily administered chloroform to make
assurance doubly sure. There was no evidence that the
prisoner was insane.
The judge, in summing up, referring to the gruesome
nature of the case, said there was a strong body of evidence
against the prisoner. After only twelve minutes' considera-
tion, the jury returned with a verdict of guilty, and Devereux
was sentenced to death.
CHAPTER XVII
THE CRIPPEN CASE
IN 1883 an American named Hawley Harvey Crippen came
to England to attend various hospitals for the purpose
of seeing operations. He was born at Coldwater, Michigan,
U.S.A., in 1862, where he was educated at the Homoeopathic
College at Cleveland, and took a degree as Doctor of Medicine.
After being in England some months, he returned to the
States as an assistant to a Dr. Porter, of Detroit, but later he
specialized in the eye and ear, and after his marriage he
went to live in New York.
It was here in 1893, after the death of his wife, he first met
Cora Turner, whom he eventually married, and removed to
Saint Louis, where he started practice as a physician and
optician. Cora Turner was the daughter of a Russian Pole
and a German mother, and her real name was Makamotsky.
A woman, of extravagant tastes, who delighted in jewellery
and dress, she seems to have been fascinated by Crippen.
Possessing a fine voice, it was her ambition to go on the
operatic stage, and Crippen, at this time having been offered
a post as physician to Munyon's Remedies Company, removed
to New York, where he paid for the training of his wife's voice ;
but when it was completed, it was found she had no chance of
singing in opera.
Crippen was transferred by the Company first to Phila-
delphia and then to Toronto, where he managed Munyon's
business. About 1900 he was sent to England in charge of
the Company's branch, but leaving them he became physician
to what was known as the Drouet Institute. He left the
Institute to become medical adviser to a company known
as " The Aural Treatment and Sovereign Remedy Company."
This also appears to have failed, and he went back to Munyon's
350
THE CRIPPEN CASE 351
Remedies Co., where he acted as manager till he took on the
business as agent. At the same time he was running a business
called the " Gayle Teeth Specialists Company," in which he
had a partner named Rylands, but the head-quarters of his
" Aural Remedies " was at Craven House, Kingsway. Here
a Miss Ethel Le Neve was employed as a typist and clerk,
and to her Crippen seems to have confided his domestic trials
and found in her a sympathizer.
When the Crippens came to London they took a house at
39 Hilldrop Crescent, Kentish Town, where Mrs. Crippen had
the assistance of a charwoman to help her in the housework.
After they had settled down, Mrs. Crippen wanted to go on the
music-hall stage, and her husband paid a fee on several occa-
sions so that she might have a trial turn at minor music halls.
In spite of an attractive personality, elaborate dresses, and
a pleasant, clear voice, she could not get a sympathetic
hearing, proving that she had no stage talent whatever. She
was known on the stage as Belle Elmore, and being bitterly
disappointed at her inability to get engagements, she became
nervous and irritable and subject to fits of violent temper.
Crippen 's domestic infelicities were commonly known to
his friends, before whom his wife would openly abuse him,
often for the most trivial occurrences. His home aifairs went
from bad to worse, and his wife gave him continual uneasiness
and trouble. On several occasions she threatened to leave
him and go off with another man with whom she had become
intimate.
On January 31, 1910, in the afternoon, Crippen called
upon two friends and invited them to his house for the
evening to have a game of cards. They agreed, and came
to dinner, Mrs. Crippen preparing the meal and helping
to serve it, there being no servant present. Apparently
husband and wife were on quite good terms, and their guests
departed about one o'clock in the morning, leaving Crippen
and his wife alone in the house.
This was the last time Mrs. Crippen was seen alive.
On February 2 there was a meeting of the Committee
of the Music Hall Ladies' Guild, of which Mrs. Crippen
was the honorary treasurer, and a regular attendant, but
this time she did not put in an appearance. To explain
352 POISON MYSTERIES
her absence, Miss Le Neve came to the meeting, bringing
with her two letters. One was addressed to Miss May, the
secretary of the Guild, and stated the illness of a near relative
had called Mrs. Crippen to America at a few hours' notice,
and tendering her resignation. This was signed ' Belle Elmore,
per pro H:^H. C."
The other letter, which was addressed to the Committee
of the Music Hall Ladies' Guild, was similar in purport, and
repeated her resignation of the honorary treasurership, and
enclosed a cheque-book and deposit-book for the immediate
use of her successor. The letter concluded by saying, " I
hope some months later to be with you, and in the meantime
wish the Guild every success." This was also signed " Belle
Elmore," although the letter was obviously in her husband's
writing.
The reading of the letters took the members of the Committee
by surprise. A few days afterwards a friend of Mrs. Crippen,
who was very fond of her, met Dr. Crippen and asked him more
particularly about his wife's journey, but could gain nothing
very definite in reply. Shortly afterwards this lady again saw
Crippen, who informed her that he had that morning heard
from his wife who stated she had been rather ill, having some-
thing the matter with her lungs.
About the last week in February, there was a dinner given
by the Music Hall Artists' Benevolent Fund. Dr. Crippen
attended it, accompanied by Miss Le Neve, and it was noticed
that she was wearing a brooch that several persons recognized
as one they had often seen Mrs. Crippen wearing. During
dinner, a lady member of the Guild asked Crippen some
details of his wife's whereabouts, and he told her that she was
then up in the mountains in the wilds of California.
As time went on her friends still continued to make inquiries
about her mysterious disappearance, and on March 21 a
letter was received by Mr. and Mrs. Martinetti from Crippen,
in which he said he had been upset by serious news about his
wife, having received a cable that she was dangerously ill
with double pneumonia. A day or two later, meeting Mrs
Martinetti, he said he was expecting a cable at any time saying
his wife was dead. On March 23 he sent a telegram to Mrs.
Martinetti saying he had heard his wife was dead. Three
THE CRIPPEN CASE 353
days later he inserted an announcement of the death in the
Era and gave notice to his landlord that he would be leaving
the house in Hilldrop Crescent on June 24.
I^rs. Crippen's friends still continued puzzled about her
mysterious disappearance and her supposed death, and a Mr.
Nash, who was connected with the music-hall profession, on
returning from America, where he had been on a visit, inter-
viewed Crippen. He was evidently dissatisfied with Crippen's
replies to his questions respecting the disappearance of his
wife, and he went to Scotland Yard, placing his suspicions
before Inspector Dew.
After exhaustive inquiries with a view if possible of finding
Mrs. Crippen or some trace of her, the inspector decided to see
Crippen himself, and to find out if he could obtain some
information. He called at Hilldrop Crescent on July 18,
about 10 in the morning, and saw Miss Le Neve, who was there
with a yoimg French servant girl. The inspector asked where
he could find Crippen, and Miss Le Neve was unable to give him
any information, but she gave him his business address at
Albion House in Oxford Street. Inspector Dew went there
and saw Crippen, and asked him what light he could throw on
the supposed death of his wife. Crippen replied, " Well, I
suppose I had better tell the truth. All my stories about her
illness and death are untrue ; so far as I know she is not dead
at all."
He then made a long detailed statement to the inspector,
which he committed to writing and signed.
In this statement, which began with an account of his
career from the time he was born, he said that his wife had
often threatened to leave him, saying she would go out of his
hfe and he would never hear from her again. On the night
that their friends came to dinner they had a quarrel after
they left, and she said, " I shall leave you to-morrow and
you will not hear from me again."
" She told me," he stated, "that I was to arrange to cover
up any scandal from our mutual friends ; I went to business
next morning and on returning home between five and six
o'clock I found she had gone. I then wrote the letters to
the Guild secretary, and realizing this would not be sufficient
to explain her not coming back, I added she was ill with
z
354 POISON MYSTERIES
pneumonia and afterwards that she had died in CaUfornia.
"When my wife went away I cannot say whether she
took anything with her. She took some of her jewellery,
I know, but she left her rings behind. I do not know what
clothes she took away. It is true that I was at the Benevolent
Fund dinner at the Criterion with Miss Le Neve, and she wore
the brooch left behind. She also wore my wife's furs. After
I told them my wife was dead, Miss Le Neve and I went to
Dieppe for five days. My belief is that my wife has gone to
Chicago to join Bruce Miller, a man whom she knew and who,
I believe, had speculated and made money."
Crippen signed this statement and Inspector Dew said,
"That is all very well, but your wife has got to be found,"
and suggested an advertisement in the newspapers and dis-
cussed with Crippen the form of it. They drew up an adver-
tisement between them, as follows : —
" Makamotsky. Will Belle Elmore communicate with
H, H. C. or authorities at once. Serious trouble from your
absence. Twenty-five dollars for communicating her where-
abouts to -."
The address was left open for Crippen to decide upon.
On Crippen's invitation. Inspector Dew made a search of
the house in Hilldrop Crescent, but found nothing of a sus-
picious nature. The next morning Crippen arrived at his
place of business a little earlier than usual, and his clerk
remarked on his worried appearance. Crippen said that he
had been bothered, as there was a little scandal. He told him
that he was going away, and that if anything happened to him
the clerk must deal with the letters. He then sent him out to
purchase a suit of boy's clothes, and about 11.30 Miss Le Neve
came to the office, where she changed her clothes for the boy's
suit purchased by the clerk, and left the office without anyone
noticing her, disguised as a boy. Crippen then saw the
manageress of Munyon's Company and asked her to change
him a cheque for £37, showing his pass-book at the Charing
Cross Bank, where he had a balance to that amount. He
produced a cheque signed Belle Elmore, the account being
in their joint names, and the manageress gave him cash in
exchange.
This occurred on July 9, and from that date Crippen
THE CRIPPEN CASE 355
and Miss Le Neve disappeared. On July 11 Inspector Dew
again went to Hilldrop Crescent to have a further interview
with Crippen and Miss Le Neve, and found they had gone.
He then began a systematic search of the premises, and on the
13th his suspicions were aroused by something he saw on the
floor leading to the cellar. He decided to examine it more
carefully, and finding some bricks which appeared to be loose,
he decided to take up the floor. The result was, that he
discovered what were obviously human remains, and sent for
the divisional sergeant of police. The remains were as far
as possible uncovered, but not removed, and on July 14 they
were examined by Mr. Pepper, at whose request they were
removed to the mortuary for closer examination . The remains
having been buried in quicklime were found to be in a fairly
good state of preservation, most of the internal organs, such
as the heart, the spleen, intestines and stomach being intact.
The extraordinary part of the matter was, that no bones were
found, and the head, hands and feet were missing. It was
apparent that the individual who had carried out the eviscera-
tion had done everything possible to prevent identification as
regards the body. Some things, however, were forgotten, such
as portions of articles of clothing, and some hair done up in
curling pins, some strands of which were fuUy eight inches
long, proving they belonged to a female.
Another point noticed was, that the hair had been bleached.
The articles of clothing showed the arm-piece of a suit of
pyjamas, and separately, the right back portion of the jacket
of a similar suit, with the maker's name on it. The woman's
clothing consisted of a camisole. The name on the pyjamas
was discovered to be the same as on those which Crippen wore
and which were found in his box.
Following this discovery, a warrant was issued on July 16
for the arrest of Crippen and Miss Le Neve.
The scene now changes to the Atlantic. On July 20 the
steamship Montrose sailed from Antwerp bound for Quebec,
and among the passengers who embarked at that port were a
Mr. Robinson and his son. They mixed freely with the
passengers on the ship, but circumstances arose when they
were a few days out, to cause the captain to make particular
observation of the son, and from certain characteristics, he
356 POISON MYSTERIES
began to doubt his sex. Communicating his suspicions to
two of the passengers, they soon confirmed his behef that
Mr. Robinson junior was, in fact, a girl.
Suspecting something was wrong, on July 22 the captain
sent a wireless message asking the police to follow and board
his ship, as he was convinced that Mr. Robinson and his son
were the Dr. Crippen and Ethel Le Neve who were being
sought for by the police. It was probably the first time that
wireless telegraphy had been used in connection with suspected
criminals.
The day after the receipt of the message, Inspector Dew and
Sergeant Mitchell sailed from Liverpool in the s.s. Laurentic,
which overtook the Montrose at sea. During the voyage,
Crippen had become very friendly with the quartermaster
of the ship, and a couple of days before the vessel was due at
Quebec, the quartermaster gave him a hint that the Canadian
police were on his track. It is said an arrangement was
made between them, in order to avoid the police on landing,
that Crippen should be concealed among the cargo, and at
an appointed hour there should be a splash in the water as if
some one had fallen or jumped overboard, while in the cabin a
tell-tale message was to be found. It was thought that no
one would think of searching the cargo for the missing man,
and thus the fugitive was to get clear away. Miss Le Neve in
the meanwhile being advised of an address where she might
join him afterwards if all went well.
All Crippen's arrangements, however, were upset by
Inspector Dew boarding the s.s. Montrose at Farther Point,
Quebec. The inspector saw Crippen pacing the deck near
the captain's cabin. " Good morning. Dr. Crippen," he
remarked. " Good morning, Mr. Dew," replied Crippen.
Dew then told him he would be arrested for the murder and
mutilation of his wife, Cora Crippen, in London, on February 2.
Miss Le Neve, who was still dressed in her suit of boy's clothes,
was also arrested. A written card, evidently intended for
Miss Le Neve, was found on Crippen. It was in his hand-
writing and said that he could not stand the horrors he had
gone through. There was nothing bright ahead and he had
made up his mind to jump overboard that night.
Crippen and Miss Le Neve were brought back to England
THE CRIPPEN CASE 357
by Inspector Dew on the s.s. Megantic, and they landed at
Liverpool on August 27, and were taken to London. A great
crowd had assembled at Euston Station, where the prisoners
had a hostile reception, being greeted with groans and hisses.
On August 29 they were charged at Bow Street, and committed
for trial at the Central Criminal Court, one on the charge of
murder, and the other as being accessory after the fact.
At the trial of Crippen it transpired that on January 19
he had purchased at a pharmacy in New Oxford Street five
grains of hyoscine hydrobromide, for which he signed the
poison register, stating it was required for making homoeo-
pathic preparations. At this shop Crippen had previously
purchased a number of drugs such as cocaine, morphine, and
mercury, and was well known there. He had also written pre-
scriptions which had been prepared for him.
Mr. Augustus Pepper, surgeon to St. Mary's Hospital,
gave the result of his examination, and in his opinion, he
concluded that the remains were undoubtedly those of a
woman, adding that the person who removed the various
organs showed considerable dexterity. The remains were
buried very soon after death, and approximately they
had been in the ground from four to eight months. On a
portion of the body found there was a scar, the result of an
operation which it was discovered Mrs. Crippen had undergone
some time ago. This was important as evidence of identifica-
tion . He had examined the hair which was found in the curler,
and said that the longest was eight inches long and the shortest
two and a half inches. It showed signs of having been arti-
ficially dealt with, and was partially bleached, but the natural
colour of the hair was probably a dark brown. The very
lightest portion was a pale yeUow.
Dr. Marshall, who assisted Mr. Pepper, stated that there was
no evidence at all that suggested the remains were those of
a male. What little evidence there was pointed to their being
those of a female. He was of the opinion that the scar was
the result of an operation, and his impression was there were
also marks of stitches.
Dr. B. H. Spilsbury, pathologist of St. Mary's Hospital,
who was called for the prosecution, stated he had made a
microscopical examination of this piece of skin, and confirmed
358 POISON MYSTERIES
the opinion that it was undoubtedly an old scar which had been
stretched.
Dr. W. H. Willcox, senior analyst to the Home Office,
gave evidence as to the examination of the organs of
the body found. He stated that he had tested the extracts
he had made from the organs physiologically, and in each
case got complete paralysis of the pupil of the eye. He also
made chemical tests in the case of the liver and intestine, and
he concluded that hyoscine was present, corresponding approxi-
mately to one-thirtieth of a grain in the whole stomach. He
also found an amount of alkaloid corresponding to one-
fortieth of a grain in the whole of the kidney, and an amount
corresponding approximately to one-seventh of a grain in the
intestines, and in the liver approximately an amount of one-
twelfth of a grain. He believed the alkaloid found to be
hyoscine, and the total amount to be two-sevenths of a grain
approximately. In his opinion there must have been present
in the whole body more than half a grain, and the probable
fatal dose of hyoscine hydrobromide would be from one-quarter
to one-half a grain. It was not commonly prescribed, and was
chiefly used in sedatives in such conditions as mania and
meningitis, in doses from one two-hundredth to one hundredth
of a grain. He was of the opinion it had been administered by
the mouth and not as an injection, because of the large amount
found in the intestines. He believed the cause of death was
poison by hyoscine or a salt of hyoscine.
The counsel for the prisoner suggested that alkaloidal
substances resembling atropine or hyoscamine had been met
with in decomposed meat, but Dr. Willcox negatived the
suggestion.
Dr. Luff, scientific adviser to the Home Office, said he had
followed Dr. Willcox's tests in evidence, and he agreed that the
poison found was undoubtedly hyoscine. During seventeen
years' experience he had always tested for animal alkaloids
in toxicological cases, and before that he had conducted a
long series of investigations for animal alkaloids, but only on
one occasion had he come across them, and that was in some
putrefied meat. It was quite impossible that hyoscine could
be mistaken for an animal mydriadic alkaloid under Vitali's
test.
THE CRIPPEN CASE 359
Mr. Tobin, who defended Crippen, contended that the
alkaloid found by Dr. Willcox in the remains might have been
traced to an animal alkaloid produced after death as the result
of putrefaction. He dwelt on the fact of the lack of motive
Crippen had for the suggested crime ; and that although he
had purchased five grains of hyoscine hydrobromide, he had
signed his name in the poison register, although there was no
need for him to have done so. He bought the drug in January
when he was still agent for Munyon's Remedies, for the purpose
of making it into a liquid and using it in the form of the tiny
homoeopathic tablets which he sold in bottles of three hundred
each, to patients. He said that although no obligation rested
upon Dr. Crippen to go into the witness box, he chose to go
of his. own accord, and he would call him.
Crippen was taken through the story of his life by the
examining counsel, and coming to the question of his purchase
of drugs he said he always made up the preparations he sold,
and had bought considerable quantities of different poisons,
such as aconite, belladonna and Rhus tox. He had frequently
used hyoscine in making his homoeopathic preparations in
extremely minute doses. He admitted purchasing the
hyoscine and explained how he used it, by first dissolving it in
alcohol, then saturating a certain amount of small disks or
tablets, two of which would equal i/36ooth part of a grain.
He used it in nervous diseases.
Crippen, examined by the Lord Chief Justice, said he
took no steps to find out where his wife had gone to,
up to July 8. For three hours He stood the fire of
cross-examination by Mr. Muir, the leading counsel for
the Crown, and from beginning to end appeared to be utterly
devoid of emotion or anything in the least approaching it,
nor did he ever lose his self-possession or show the slightest
sign of being ruffled.
During the trial Mr. Bruce Miller, whose name had been
mentioned by Crippen in connection with his wife, was called,
and swore that he had not seen Mrs. Crippen since she kft
America in 1904.
The Lord Chief Justice, in his summing up of the case,
impressed upon the jury that they must be satisfied by the
whole of the evidence that the Crown had made out their case,
36o POISON MYSTERIES
and if not, the prisoner was entitled to the benefit of the
doubt. The crime of murder charged against Crippen was
that he wilfully and intentionally killed his wife by poison,
and then mutilated the body and buried the remains in the
cellar at 39 Hill drop Crescent, in order to conceal his crime.
There was no question here of suggesting that it was by some
other means or by some other method or agency that Crippen
had caused the death of his wife, and it involved two ques-
tions : first, whether the remains found in the house were
those of the body of Cora Crippen ; if they were not, there was
an end of the case ; if they were the remains of this woman,
then it was a question, was her death occasioned by the wilful
act of her husband ? These were the two issues upon which
the jury must concentrate their attention.
After exactly half an hour's absence the jury returned and
declared they unanimously found the prisoner guilty of wilful
murder, and Crippen was sentenced to death.
The following morning the trial of Miss Le Neve took place,
she being indicted upon the charge of being accessory after
the fact of the wilful murder of Cora Crippen. No witnesses
were called for the case, and after some formal proceedings
the jury found a verdict of acquittal.
The case was brought before the Court of Criminal Appeal,
but the appeal was dismissed, and Crippen was executed at
Pentonville Prison on November 23, 1910. It is said he made
no confession of his crime.
Thus ended the trial of one who was described by Lord
Alverstone as an extraordinary man. Throughout the trial
he never showed a symptom of concern or trace of emotion or
fear ; he appeared to be never at a loss for a word or explana-
tion, and showed remarkable self-possession all through, the
only argument his counsel could adduce in his defence. But
after all this is one of the salient characteristics of poisoners.
In Crippen's case we have a man possessing some medical
knowledge ; who had deliberately chosen a little-known
poison to carry out his evil design. He had probably pre-
pared and planned the deed at least a fortnight before it was
committed, and then eviscerated the remains of his victim
to try and baffie the ablest investigators. He evidently
thought his escape from justice sure. But the Nemesis
THE CRIPPEN CASE 361
which dogs the footsteps of all poisoners followed those
of Crippen, and he made three fatal mistakes. First in
burying a portion of the suit of pyjamas belonging to
himself with the remains ; second, although he destroyed
the major parts of the body to prevent identification, he left
the very remains which contained traces of the poison by
which he murdered his victim ; and third, and most remark-
able of all, he forgot to remove the portion of the body contain-
ing the scar, which ultimately established beyond all doubt
the identity of the remains as those of Cora Crippen, his wife.
This case is noteworthy as being the first on record in which
hyoscine was used for criminal poisoning in this country. The
presence of the alkaloid was clearly demonstrated, although
the remains had been buried for six months.
CHAPTER XVIII
THE MYSTERY OF THE SEDDONS
THERE have been few cases in the history of poisoning
where a man and his wife have been charged on the
capital charge, therefore the trial of Frederick Henry Seddon
and Mary Anne, his wife, on the charge of murdering Eliza-
beth Barrow at 63 Tollington Park, N., on September 14,
1911, is one of some interest. The mysterious circumstances
connected with the case are also somewhat out of the ordin-
ary, as the evidence largely was of a circumstantial character.
In 1901 Seddon, who was a superintendent of canvassers
for an industrial insurance company, was living with his wife
and three children at 63 Tollington Park, and on July 26, 1910,
a Miss Eliza Mary Barrow, a woman of 49 years of age, came to
lodge with them. She appears to have been a person of a some-
what strange temperament. She was very deaf, and had in
her charge a small boy named Ernest Grant, an orphan of some
people with whom she formerly lived. Miss Barrow was the
possessor of a considerable sum of money, amounting to about
£4,000, part of which was invested in stocks, and she was also
the owner of some leasehold property. She had a curious, but
not unusual, characteristic of hoarding gold and notes to a
large amount in a cash-box, which she kept in a box in her
room. There was probably £400 in gold and a considerable
number of five-pound notes, said to be at least thirty-three,
kept in this cash-box.
All this property disappeared by September 14, 191 1, and on
that date there appeared to be little cash left in her possession.
All the property had found its way into the hands of the
Seddons, which included £600 of India stock, the leasehold
property and some £200 in cash as well. During October
both Seddon and his wife were dealing with five-pound
362
THE MYSTERY OF THE SEDDONS 363
notes which undoubtedly belonged to Miss Barrow, and which
had been in her cash-box. On the day when the India stock
and leasehold property were transferred, Mrs. Seddon changed
tWo five-pound notes, endorsing them with a false name and
address. Six other notes were also paid into Seddon's bank-
ing account.
According to Seddon, the money had been transferred to
him by agreement with Miss Barrow, and he was to give her
an annuity of a pound a week in exchange for the interest
on it. He said that he had a verbal agreement with her by
which he was bound to pay her an annuity of £72 a year in
addition to the rooms in the house, in return for the property
of the India stock.
On September i Miss Barrow became ill, from what her
medical adviser diagnosed as epidemic diarrhoea, and this
continued for at least eight or nine days, after which she
began to improve and seemed to be getting better. While
she was ill, Mrs. Seddon was the only one who attended to
her, with the exception of Seddon, who was known to have
gone into her room on September 11, when she made a will,
appointing him as her sole executor and trustee. Mrs. Seddon
saw after the cooking of Miss Barrow's food and did everything
necessary for her, and no servant went near the apartment.
On the night of the 13th she became rapidly worse, but the
doctor was not called in until about six o'clock in the morning
of the 14th, when she died. Seddon saw the doctor and
obtained a certificate to the effect that death was due to
epidemic diarrhoea, and two days afterwards the funeral
took place. There were some significant facts with regard to
what happened after her death. No relative was present
at the funeral, nor were they informed of her death until
September 20.
After the funeral there was some inquiry from one of the
relatives, a Mr. Wonderahe, who had an interview with
Seddon. His suspicions being aroused that all was not well,
he communicated with the authorities, and inquiries were
instituted, which resulted in an order being given for the
exhumation of the body on November 15. A post-mortem
examination was made, and it was found that Miss Barrow
died from the effects of arsenic, the poison being widely dis-
364 POISON MYSTERIES
tributed throughout her body. The doctor had not prescribed
arsenic in his treatment during her illness, and as Seddon and
his wife were the only two people who had come near her dur-
ing the period, they were arrested and charged v/ith the crime.
How the poison was obtained, and who administered it were
the paramount questions at the trial.
During Miss Barrow's illness no one else appeared to have
entered her bedroom but the man and his wife, and yet the
quantity of arsenic found in the body was so large, that it
was found even in the hair and nails. Shortly after Miss
Barrow's death, Seddon was seen by two of his colleagues to
be in possession of considerable sums of money, including
£200 in gold and also jewellery. He bought shares in a Build-
ing Society, which he paid for in cash, and made several pay-
ments amounting to £150 in gold.
A chemist at Crouch Hill stated, that a girl he had since
identified as Seddon's daughter, purchased from him a packet
of six arsenical fly-papers ; she asked for arsenical papers and
not the "sticky" ones.
A doctor who treated Miss Barrow in August, 191 1, said she
was then suffering from congestion of the liver, and at the end
of the month had an attack of asthma, but the symptoms were
not severe, and she made no complaint of pain or sickness.
The doctor who was called in to attend her on September 2
had attended the Seddons for some years. He found her
suffering from sickness and prescribed for her. On the 13th
the symptoms of the illness had returned, but he did not
consider her condition critical. The following day Seddon
came to see him and said Miss Barrow was dead, and he gave a
certificate that death was due to epidemic diarrhoea, but he
never prescribed arsenic in any form for her during her illness.
Dr. Spilsbury, who conducted the post-mortem examina-
tion, stated that the body was in an abnormal state of preserva-
tion, and after witnessing tests made by Dr. Willcox, he was
of the opinion that death was due to acute arsenical poisoning,
which meant poisoning by one or more large doses of arsenic.
He had found no sign of internal disease, and in this particular
case he could find no external or internal indication of chronic
arsenical poisoning.
Dr, Willcox, who made the analysis for the Home Office,
THE MYSTERY OF THE SEDDONS 365
said he found arsenic in all the remains and tissues, the
largest proportion being in the stomach, intestines, liver
and muscles ; there was arsenic in the skin, heart and
nails, and it was distributed throughout the body. He
agreed with Dr. Spilsbury as to the cause of death. He
estimated that there was in the remains 2-oi grains of arsenic,
and that would indicate to him that more than that amount
had been taken. There might have been an amount of five
grains taken within three days of death. In his opinion the
fatal dose was given within two or three days of death, pro-
bably two days. Two grains of arsenic would be a poisonous
dose, and might be enough to kill an adult person, and two or
three such doses within a short period of time would be fatal.
Dr. Willcox said he had heard a suggestion in this case
that carbonate of bismuth contained arsenic. He had made
an analysis of some and found a very faint trace of about
one in a million, so at least two hundredweight of bismuth
carbonate would be required to give two grains of arsenic.
He made an analysis of the arsenical fly-papers and found
arsenic in a quantity varying from 3-8 to 6 grs. per paper. If
the paper was actually boiled in water for some minutes,
practically all the arsenic would be got out, and he had
obtained 6-6 grs. by boiling one, 6 grs. from another and 3 grs.
from another. In his opinion the 2-oi grs. he found in Miss
Barrow's body would be sufficient to kill an adult person.
A considerable point was made by the counsel for the
prosecution in the cross-examination of Dr. Willcox as to the
finding of arsenic in the tips of the hair. Counsel remarked,
that one of the most important subjects of investigation before
the Royal Commission of inquiry into arsenical poisoning,
was the presence of arsenic in the hair and the length of time
it must have taken before it reached the hair tips. Counsel
said that the fact that arsenic was found in the tips of Miss
Ban-ow's hair proved that it must have been given for a period
extending over two or three months. Dr. Willcox said that
it need not mean that arsenic was being taken continuously,
but some might have been taken a year or more previously,
and in the present case he was inclined to the opinion that
there had been one fatal dose given in the last three days before
death.
366 POISON MYSTERIES
Mr. Marshall Hall, who defended Seddon, submitted that
there was not sufficient evidence to give to the jury, and
suggested the case was absolutely a unique one. In all other
cases of poisoning there was some direct tracing of the poison,
and in the cases of some men who had been tried previously,
such as Lamson and Cream, there had been medical knowledge
in the possession of the prisoners, but in this case there were
two people charged on circumstantial evidence and it could
not be said which of them did it. Beyond the evidence of the
chemist who said he had sold Margaret Seddon certain
fly-papers, there was no proof of any poison being in the
possession of either party. Mrs. Seddon said that she her-
self bought some fly-papers in consequence of the request
from Miss Barrow, that something should be done to mitigate
the nuisance of flies in the room. She remembered that on
one occasion, the contents of four saucers were emptied into
one which was placed on the washstand in the room.
Seddon was then called to give evidence and stated that
Miss Barrow had asked him about reinvesting her money,
as she was losing capital, and he suggested an annuity, which
she agreed to in exchange for her India stock and the lease of
her property. He denied ever handling the fly-papers which
came to his house and beyond giving her a little brandy the
last night when she was very ill, he had never given her any-
thing to eat or drink. He had not the smallest suspicion: at
that time that she was fatally or dangerously ill. He declared
he had never purchased arsenic in his life in any shape or form,
and swore that he had never either administered or instructed
the administration of it.
Mrs. Seddon, who also went into the box, said there were a
great many flies in Miss Barrow's room, and Miss Barrow asked
her to get some fly-papers, " Not the sticky ones, but those you
wet." She herself bought them at the shop of a neighbouring
chemist and took four on being told she could get them at a
reduced price. The papers were shown to Miss Barrow and
placed in a saucer in her room with water on them. Dur-
ing Miss Barrow's illness, she waited upon her, and on one
occasion, only, did Mr. Seddon give Miss Barrow any medicine.
She had never bought a fly-paper until she bought these,
and she had never sent her daughter for anything of the kind.
THE MYSTERY OF THE SEDDONS 367
She began by putting them in saucers singly, two on the
mantelpiece and two on the chest of drawers. Then there
was an accident, she remembered, and she emptied them into
a soup-plate and repeatedly moistened them if they were
going dry.
Mr. Justice Bucknill, in summing up, said if the prisoners
were guilty, it was a crime which had been carefully thought
out and carefully committed in secret. The history of great
poisoning cases showed that the poisoner did not poison in
open daylight, in the presence of other persons. It was a
secret crime, done in the dark, and if this particular crime was
proved against these people there could be no doubt as to its
being an abominable one, and that the love of gold led to it.
The question to answer was, what was the cause of Miss
Barrow's death ? A considerable amount of arsenic had been
found in the body ; how did it get there ? There was no
direct evidence that Seddon had ever been seen to handle a
fly-paper or the water in which one had been soaking. In
view of the medical evidence it ought not to be difficult to
decide that Miss Barrow died from arsenical poisoning, and
it was for the jury to decide whether that arsenic was admin-
istered by the prisoners or either of them.
After considering for an hour and five minutes, the jury
found Seddon guilty and his wife " Not Guilty." Before
sentence was passed upon the man, he read a long statement
in which he again denied that he was guilty of the crime.
Seddon was condemned to death and his wife was acquitted,
and he suffered the extreme penalty of the law on April
18, 1912.
The verdict was much discussed in the Press, and some ten
thousand persons, including Mrs. Seddon, assembled in Hyde
Park and presented a petition at the Home Office to get the
verdict set aside. The Court of Criminal Appeal was asked
to quash the conviction, but the judges said they saw no
reason to say the verdict was wrong or unreasonable.
In November, 1912, Mrs. Seddon made a remarkable state-
ment in the Press which was published in the Weekly Dispatch
of November 17. In it she stated, that Seddon committed
the crime, that she saw him give the poison to Miss Barrow,
that on the fatal night he deliberately substituted for the
368 POISON MYSTERIES
medicine the water from the fly-papers and white precipitate
powder and gave it to Miss Barrow. She continued : —
" Soon afterwards she breathed her last and I threatened
to call the police, but he pointed his revolver at my head and
told me if I informed on him he would blow my brains out.
He had always slept with a loaded revolver under his pillow.
It was Seddon who told me about the flies in Miss Barrow's
bedroom and asked me to buy the fly-papers. He would not
let me arrange them in the room but took them himself.
Late that night Miss Barrow complained to me about the
medicine tasting funny. Something made me look round.
I found a saucer that I had not put there. It was damp,
and I put my finger to it and then on my tongue. It tasted
very queer. On the night of her death Seddon went out to
a theatre ; several times during that evening Miss Barrow
had called out " I am dying," and I told my husband this
when he came in, but he laughed. Later on he went to the
bedroom and I followed him. Miss Barrow begged him to
send for the doctor, but he refused ; I left the room for a
few minutes. On coming back Seddon did not notice me
standing near the doorway. I saw that the doctor's medicine
had been put on one side, and my husband was mixing water
from fly-papers and white precipitate powder which was to
make the mixture look like that sent by the doctor. Then
I saw him approach the bed and give Miss Barrow several
doses."
Sir William Willcox, commenting on this case,^ said it
was of interest because arsenic was found in all the organs
of the victim. Miss Barrow, and a computation of the total
amount of arsenic in the body was made by a determination
of the arsenic present in each organ. The corpse was actually
weighed for this purpose, as well as the individual organs.
A fatal poisonous dose of 2 gr. was proved to be present in
the body. For the purpose of this analysis the electrolytic
Marsh-Berzelius test was used for the first time in determining
quantitatively the amount of arsenic in each organ.
^ Presidential Address before the Harveian Society, Jan. 11, 1923.
CHAPTER XIX
THE DALKEITH COFFEE POISON CASE
IN the early part of February, 191 1, a Mr. Charles Barrett
Hutchison and his wife, in celebration of their silver
wedding day, gave a whist and supper party to some friends
at their house at Bridgend, Dalkeith, near Edinburgh.
There were four tables in the room, eighteen people being
present, and at midnight supper was served. Coffee was taken
to the ladies in the drawing-room, and on Mrs. Hutchison
tasting it she called to her son John, who had been pouring
it out in the dining-room, that there was something wrong.
Mr. Hutchison and a Mr. Alexander Clapperton, a grocer and
wine merchant of Musselburgh, were among those who were
drinking the coffee and smoking in the dining-room. Shortly
after drinking it, one of the party began to experience a peculiar
sensation and to have a disagreeable dryness in the throat.
Then it was discovered that most of the ladies in the drawing-
room were also in great distress, and in a short time every
one who had partaken of the coffee became ill, and the results
threatened to become serious.
One of the guests hurried for assistance, and medical men
soon arrived and did what they could to aid the sufferers.
Mr. Hutchison's eldest son, John, who had been a dis-
penser, mixed an emetic of mustard and water, which
gave the sufferers a certain amount of relief and then he
motored to Edinburgh for further assistance. Mr. Hutchison,
who had been assisted to bed, passed away shortly after the
doctor's arrival, and his friend, Mr. Clapperton, died about
three hours afterwards. Practically the whole of the party of
eighteen were affected with greater or lesser severity, but only
the host and his friend succumbed.
The coffee had come from the shop of Mr. Clapperton, one
369 A A
370 POISON MYSTERIES
of the victims, and although samples of it were subjected to
analysis, no trace of poison could be found. The sugar and
milk were also examined without result, but clear traces of
arsenic were discovered by the analyst in a portion of the pre-
pared coffee that had not been consumed. It was evident that
the quantity of arsenic introduced must have been very large
to have affected so many people, but where had it come from ?
That was the mystery. The poison books of the chemists in
Dalkeith and Musselburgh were examined by the police, but
all arsenic sold during the previous twelve months was satis-
factorily accounted for. All kinds of theories were adduced.
One brought forward was, that the coffee had been prepared
in an old urn which might have absorbed the poison from the
metal, but the vessels in which the coffee was made were
examined and not a trace of arsenic was found, and so the
mystery remained unsolved for over a fortnight.
The police still continued their inquiries beyond the neigh-
bourhood, and eventually at Musselburgh it was found, that a
bottle of arsenic was missing from a chemist's shop which had
apparently been surreptitiously removed . It then appeared that
John James Hutchison had been an assistant to the chemist
from whose shop the bottle was missing. This, coupled with
the fact, that it was he who had carried the poisoned coffee
from the kitchen to the dining-room in his father's house, led
to the issue of a warrant for his arrest.
It was then found that John Hutchison had left Bridgend
for Edinburgh, ten miles distant, very early in the morning.
He was recognized at Waverley Station, Edinburgh, at nine
o'clock entering a south-bound express for Newcastle and
King's Cross, and on Wednesday a letter dated from an hotel in
the Strand reached one of his friends. It contained a passage
saying, that the writer intended to throw himself into the
Thames off Waterloo Bridge.
Inquiries meanwhile proved that he had been speculating
on the Stock Exchange, and his speculations in oil and copper
proving unfortunate, he was heavily in debt.
When the inspector, armed with a warrant, arrived at the
hotel in London to which he had been traced, he found that he
had left. All trace of him was lost for a time, but a descrip-
tion being issued, it was discovered that he had travelled
THE DALKEITH COFFEE POISON CASE 371
to Southampton and taken a boat to the Channel Islands.
Passing through Guernsey, he travelled to Jersey, where he
stayed a night and returned to Guernsey again. To a board-
ing-house in the latter island he was traced by the local police
and recognized from a photograph that had been sent to them.
The police sergeant found him in a sitting-room alone, and after
charging him made the arrest. When in the passage leading
from the room, Hutchison suddenly darted upstairs, followed
by the sergeant. He made for his bedroom, and as he opened
the door he drew his hand out of his trousers' pocket and
put a phial to his lips before the sergeant could interfere.
A doctor was sent for, and although emetics were adminis-
tered, he died a few minutes after his arrival, or about ten
minutes after taking the fatal draught. He gave no informa-
tion to the sergeant, except saying in the room below, that he
would prove he was not Hutchison. He had taken his room
in the hotel under the name of Henderson, but from papers
and other documents found in his possession there was no
doubt he was John James Hutchison, of Dalkeith.
The poison by means of which he had committed suicide
turned out to be prussic acid, which he had probably had in
his possession for some time. It is an extraordinary psycho-
logical problem how a young man of this type, apparently so
much liked and popular among the people of the town where he
lived, and said to be of a generous, kindly and gentle disposition
could have perpetrated the deed. According to his friends,
he was the last person in the world who would be thought
likely to commit such a terrible crime.
After the death of his father he had been perfectly collected,
was the chief mourner at the funeral, and became the object
of general S5mipathy.
Extravagance and social ambition appear to have been his
chief faults, but it is difficult to discover the motive which
prompted him to the commission of a wholesale crime such as
he attempted. The only conclusion that could be arrived at
was, that it was the act of a man whose mind was unbalanced
and distorted, as he had nothing to gain by his father's death
nor from any of the guests he attempted to poison.
CHAPTER XX
THE AGRA POISON MYSTERY
ONE of the most remarkable cases of criminal poisoning
in the annals of Indian justice was brought to light in
December, 1912. There was living in Agra at that time, a
Lieutenant Clark, who was an officer in the Indian Subordinate
Medical Department, and his wife, Mrs. Clark, a lady of
about fifty-five years of age. Both husband and wife were
Eurasians.
On the night of November 17, Mrs. Clark was found in the
bedroom of their bungalow badly wounded and died shortly
afterwards of her injuries. She had apparently been stabbed
to death with a sharp instrument. Her husband informed the
authorities that she had been murdered by a native, and
suspicion fell upon a servant named Buddhu who was at one
time employed by the Clarks.
During the official inquiry which was caUed to investigate
the matter, Miss Clark, the daughter of the victim, said she
saw her mother sitting up in bed bleeding profusely from
several wounds. The lamp was low in the room and she was
unable to recognize any assailant. The whole affair seemed
to be shrouded in mystery until the police brought to light a
correspondence between Lieut. Clark and Mrs. Fulham, the
wife of an Assistant Examiner of Military Accounts, who had
died under suspicious circumstances in the previous October.
This correspondence showed a connection between the deaths
both of Mrs. Clark and of Mr. Fulham, and Lieut. Clark was
arrested on November 29, and charged with the murder both
of his wife and Mr. Fulham.
Mrs. Fulham was also charged with the murder of her
husband and Mrs. Clark, and Buddhu, the native servant, was
also arrested. The latter offered to give evidence, and testified
372
THE AGRA POISON MYSTERY 373
that Lieut. Clark had given him three powders that he was
to place in Mrs. Clark's tea, and promised him fifty rupees
when he had done it. The witness took the powders and
asked what they were for, and was told that they were aperient
medicines. At the same time Clark threatened to throttle
him if anything leaked out. He gave the powders as he was
told, and then left the service of Lieut. Clark immediately.
Miss Clark stated that her father was very violent with her
mother at times and had been very intimate for some time
with Mrs. Fulham. Mrs. Clark had objected to this and as a
result quarrels had taken place. Twice, the daughter stated,
her mother had been taken ill after a meal, and referring to
one of these attacks in a diary Mrs. Clark kept, she wrote
that the cook had put something in her tea.
Mr. Harry Clark, a son, declared that he was aware that his
mother was having poison given her and obtained possession
of some of the powder and had it analysed by a surgeon, who
said it was a " slow poison." His mother had told him that
she would be poisoned, and he tried to persuade her to go
away with him, but she refused, without giving any reason.
Major O'Meara, a civil surgeon in Agra, who examined the
body of Mrs. Clark, was of the opinion that she had been
attacked with a heavy weapon and that the blows had been
deliberately given by a man. A second son of the accused
stated that h^is father had told them that their mother had been
given more than one dose of arsenic, but she proved poison-
proof, so that he made no secret before his own family of his
intention to get rid of his wife at the first opportunity.
In one of the letters discovered, written by Mrs. Fulham to
Clark, which was dated April 22, 1911, was the statement :
" You are very thoughtful in sending me more powders ;
I was going to ask you for more, as I have only three left. I
do not think these powders are having any efiect. You say
they must be given regularly and then you say you cannot
administer them to ' Mrs. C as regularly as you would like
to. She will need much more than that. Tell me plainly
what you think."
An Assistant-Surgeon named Linton told how, when visiting
Clark's bungalow one evening, Harry Clark showed him a
374 POISON MYSTERIES
white powder and asked him whether it was poison. He
tasted it and concluded it was a compound of arsenic, and
told young Clark it was a poison and would be fatal in about
twenty minutes.
In a statement made by Mrs. Fulham that was read she
explained her friendship with Clark, and said :
" I believe Clark must have the power of hypnotism. He
made me and my husband do whatever he wished. He won
my affection completely from him. On arriving at Agra my
husband was suddenly taken ill. Clark went on his bicycle
and fetched Captain Dunn, who arrived just in time to see
my husband expire. Clark once told me he had given his
wife enough arsenic to kill ten men, but she recovered. My
husband became very ill and paralysed and helpless, and died
on October lo, 1911. Clark gave him several injections
before fetching Captain Dunn, and used a hypodermic syringe
filled with something from a small bottle."
From the evidence of these letters it was apparent that
both the accused conspired in April, 191 1, first to poison Mr.
Fulham, the poison being sent to Meerut from Agra by Lieut.
Clark, and that Mrs. Fulham wrote to Clark duly acknowledg-
ing the receipt of the poison, and sending him reports of its
effect upon her husband. In one of her letters she alludes to
an attempt to poison her husband with " Tonic Powders,"
which were believed to be a name for a deadly alkaloidal
poison which Clark had brought from Calcutta. Another
preparation was twice tried previously, but was unsuccessful
because Fulham refused to drink the tea in which it was placed
because of its peculiar taste.
Mrs. Fulham wrote to Clark on the subject, " This will
take a hundred years to kill him." Mr. Fulham became
very ill and was taken to hospital, but recovered, and his
wife wrote to Clark telling him how the attempts had failed
and they must try to find another way.
Fulham then went on a visit to Agra, where he was taken
very ill after dinner and died shortly afterwards. Clark
himself wrote the death certificate, stating that- he died of
" general paralysis of three months' standing."
In another letter from Mrs. Fulham to Clark on May 20,
191 1, she stated ;
THE AGRA POISON MYSTERY 375
" I administered the powder you left. There was no result.
I shall begin in earnest on Monday and inform you of the
results."
On May 23 she said :
" I again have news for you. I administered a full dose
yesterday. Hubby returned the tea untasted. He said
there was bad medicine in it. This shows that jalapine is
readily tasted. The fates are against us. All our attempts
are bitterly frustrated. I feel so disappointed, not so much
on my account as on yours. What is the best plan of opera-
tion in the future ? "
On May 27 she wrote :
" You assure me you are determined to win me at any cost.
Come what may, I will help you to achieve that end."
On June 11 she said :
" Hubby is very ill with symptoms of cholera. All blame
masonic dinner, but you and I know. I cannot bear to see
his suffering."
On June 27 she wrote :
" A powder is hard to administer, as my husband takes
no food prepared by me, and makes his own cocoa ; but I
am still doing my best."
Mr. Fulham's little daughter, a child of ten, told the Court a
pathetic story of how her father became ill after dinner on
the day on which he died. He was previously quite well,
but had dinner in the garden, her mother and herself taking
the meal out to him. Afterwards her father complained of
illness and went to bed. Lieut. Clark was there at the time.
She went to see her father in his room later on and going into
the dining-room afterwards, she saw Clark take a red box off
a shelf and take out a glass needle. He opened a paper and
poured out a white powder into a wineglass of water and filled
the needle. She watched him then go into her father's room
and seem to push the needle into his heart, arm and shoulder.
Shortly afterwards there was a funny gurgling noise from her
father. She went to the bedside wondering what it could be,
and found him lying on his back and the noise continued.
376 POISON MYSTERIES
He was breathing heavily and then he died. Clark came in
and felt her father's heart, but returned immediately to the
dining-room and said to her mother, " Gone." After that he
went out on a bicycle to fetch Captain Dunn. When the latter
arrived Clark pretended he did not know her father was dead
and said he brought Captain Dunn to see how Fulham was.
Lieut. Clark volunteered a statement in which he said that
Captain Dunn was consulted when Mr. Fulham was brought
to Agra and advised the injection of ether, digitalin and stry-
chnine, which was to be kept handy and used immediately
an attack was coming on. The injection he gave Mr. Fulham
as described by the child was ten minims of this mixture.
Half an hour later he made a second injection and then went
off on his cycle to fetch Captain Dunn. The bottle was labelled
" Hypodermic injection " with the prescription fully inscribed
and it was kept in Mrs. Fulham's room, where it remained
until the time of her arrest. It had been stated that he
purchased arsenic, atropine and cocaine from different
chemists in Calcutta in 191 1. He admitted he made these
purchases to treat a patient suffering from rheumatism and
neuralgia, and as they did not prove effective, he sent to
Calcutta for five grains of gelsemine for another preparation
which was harmless. This accounted for the whole of the
five grains of gelsemine which he purchased in 191 1. He
bought fifty-four grains of gelsemine and other drugs in
1912, which he had used, and gave the names of the patients
whom he had treated with the medicines in order to prove he
habitually prescribed it for certain diseases.
He also stated that he purchased 118 grains of cocaine in
191 1 and described the disposal of it and also of the thirty
grains of atropine, which he said he had used in a liniment.
A letter from Mrs. Fulham to Clark was read, asking if the
" new powders were tasteless ? " since Mr. Fulham refused
his food with the other powders. In a former letter she
describes her husband's frequency of vomiting and, after
stating what the hospital doctors thought about his case, she
added " but you and I know."
Mrs. Fulham, on being asked by the Court whether she
wished to say anything about this matter, declared that she
did not know what the powders she gave to her husband were
THE AGRA POISON MYSTERY 377
composed of, but that Lieut. Clark told her that they would
make her husband slightly ill, otherwise she would not have
given them to him.
Dr. Gore, Assistant-Chemist and Bacteriologist, stated
that Clark came to his laboratory in October and asked him
for some cholera cultures, saying that he wanted to use them
on animals in order to test a cholera specific. He told Clark
that animals did not get cholera, and therefore he did not
give him any of the cultures. Finally he put him off with
some harmless water organisms, as he thought to place cholera
cultures in Clark's inexperienced hands would be a most risky
proceeding.
On the Saturday before his wife's death, Clark came to the
laboratory again and asked for more cultures and said that
he had tried them on fowls, cats and dogs which had con-
tracted cholera and they had been cured by his specific.
Major O'Meara, who made the autopsy on Mr. Fulham,
stated that he found the remains in a remarkable state of
preservation ; it was well known that certain poisons, especially
arsenic, assisted in the preservation of the body. He was
certainly of the opinion that Mr. Fulham's symptoms were
compatible with chronic arsenical poisoning, probably given in
small doses over a long period. Taking Mrs. Fulham's state-
ments in her letters to Clark into consideration, describing
her husband's condition, it would appear his whole nervous
system and brain were wrecked, and following the administra-
tion of a powder, paralytic symptoms developed. Asked if a
dose of any poison would produce such symptoms. Major
O'Meara replied . " Yes, a certain group of poisons, one of
which is atropine." A mixture of atropine and cocaine would
also produce sjmiptoms of heat-stroke ; he considered the
fatal dose of gelsemine to be one-sixth of a grain, or less, if
administered hypodermically, and would cause rapid death.
According to the evidence of the analyst, he failed to find
any alkaloid in the remains after making tests for strychnine,
gelsemine and atropine, but he found slight traces of arsenic
in the thigh bone.
The investigation of Mr. Fulham's death having been com-
pleted, two natives named Sukhia and Ram Lai were placed
in the box and charged along with the other three prisoners.
378 POISON MYSTERIES
Buddhu, the native servant of the Clarks, then made a
confession. He said that he had first worked for four months
with Mrs. Fulham, when one day she spoke to him at her
bungalow and said she would give him something to put in
Mrs. Clark's food and would pay him fifty rupees. He had
refused to do it. Later on Lieut. Clark came into the lamp
room in the hospital and took a lamp chimney from him, from
which he made powdered glass. He made it into three powders
and told him to give it to Mrs. Clark, for which he was pro-
mised fifty rupees. When Mrs. Clark became very ill Clark
warned him to be careful not to put the powder in the children's
food. Ten days later Clark gave him a bottle and told him
if he did not give it to Mrs. Clark he would drive him from the
hospital, and on that day he poured the contents into his
mistress's tea, after which she was sick.
Later Clark asked him to come to Mrs. Fulham's bungalow,
where he also met him, and after sending the other servants
away, they both asked him if he would arrange to kill Mrs.
Clark. Buddhu said he would tell them later and afterwards
saw Sukhia and asked him if he could do anything. Sukhia
replied, '* I cannot do it for a hundred rupees, I want more."
He then took Sukhia to the Fulhams* bungalow, where Clark
was, and he and Mrs. Fulham conversed at length with Sukhia,
wjio asked for payment before he did the work. Clark replied :
" You will get the money when the work is done."
Eventually it was arranged to give Buddhu the money and
let him pay Sukhia.
At ten o'clock on the same night, Clark came to the hospital
and showed Buddhu six sovereigns and ten rupees and asked
if his fellows were coming to the bungalow. Buddhu replied,
" When the moon goes down."
He met Sukhia and Ram Lai that night, together with
another man named Mohan who brought a large knife, which
Ram Lai took. Mohan kissed and worshipped the knife
and then sharpened it on a stone.
About one o'clock they all went to Clark's bungalow.
Buddhu waited on the verandah while the other four went in
at the back door, which they tried to open, but a dog barked.
They returned to the verandah, and again went towards
Clark's bed-room, but the dog was still barking. Just at that
THE AGRA POISON MYSTERY 379
moment Clark rode up on his bicycle. The four men told him
to look after the dog, and they would at once finish the work.
Ram Lai opened the door, and Clark entered and took out the
dog, which was shut up in the outhouse. Clark then rode off,
telling the men to enter the house when he had gone. About
half-past one the four men went in, Buddhu waiting outside.
Shortly afterwards Ram Lai came out, saying he did not know
which was Mrs. Clark and which was the daughter. Buddhu
pointed out Mrs. Clark's bed, and then the other two men
brought in the lamp. Ram Lai and Sukhia stood behind the
curtain, near the daughter's bed, and, while Budhakanjore
took the lamp, the other man gave the memsahib a heavy
cut. Directly she shrieked, the man gave another cut, and
she writhed and rolled over the bed.
All the four men then left. Buddhu heard the daughter
cry out, and then ran off. When he reached the main road
the other four men demanded money. Buddhu took them to
the hospital and told them to wait. He then went back
to the bungalow, where he saw the daughter crying and Clark
standing by. Buddhu told Sukhia not to worry about the
money, as Clark would pay next morning. Ram Lai came
to the hospital eight times in the morning for money. Buddhu
told Clark, who asked him to take the men to Mrs. Fulham's
bungalow, but the same evening Sukhia still complained of
not having been paid. Buddhu did not know what happened
after that, as he was arrested.
The trial of this extraordinary case took place at Allah-
abad, on March i, before the Chief Justice. Clark confessed
that he was wholly and solely to blame, and that Mrs. Fulham
was acting under his directions. He sent her the drugs and
she gave them, under his influence.
With respect to Mr, Fulham's death he said :—
" At first I intended making him sick by giving him small
doses, so that he should have to leave the country. The last
dose made him very ill and he was brought to Agra in a dying
condition. I was sorry for his condition, that is why I
killed him. I simply administered four drachms of antipyrine
before dinner and this killed him. The injections I gave him
after dinner were ether, digitalis, and strychnine, but the
dose was too small to counteract the effects of the antipyrine.
38o • POISON MYSTERIES
I gave him antipyrine because Fulham was a wreck and I
wanted to finish him off. The injections were given only on
the pretence of doing something for him. I knew they
wojildn't do any good."
The Chief Justice. — " I understand you intended to kill
him. Did you kill him ? "
Clark. — " Yes, I took pity on his condition."
Mrs. Fulham was next questioned. In reply to the Chief
Justice regarding the administering of the poison to her
husband she said, that Clark suggested making him ill.
She gave half or quarter doses because she dared not give
the fatal dose. The heat-stroke suggestion came from Clark.
Mrs. Fulham further said that she had no explanation to
offer regarding her letter suggesting that Mrs. Clark must
also be removed. Questioned regarding the incidents on the
day Mr. Fulham died, she said she put nothing in his dinner,
but saw Clark administer a dose of medicine before dinner.
She also saw Clark give injections.
At the conclusion of Mrs. Fulham's statement, counsel for
the prosecution said that Clark had admitted that he was
criminally responsible for the death of Mr. Fulham, and it
was for the jury to decide whether his story was true, or
whether he had made the statement with a view to saving Mrs.
Fulham. Regarding the latter, counsel reminded the jury of
passages in her letters. The prosecution did not wish unduly
to press the case against her, and he only asked the jury to
act on the plain English wording of the letters. If the jury
were satisfied that she had been a consenting party to the
murder of her husband, they must also convict her.
The four Hindus were found guilty of the murder of Mrs.
Clark ; Lieut. Clark and Mrs. Fulham were found guilty in
both cases and were sentenced to be hanged. Mrs. Fulham's
sentence, however, was eventually commuted to penal servi-
tude for life.
CHAPTER XXI
A CORNISH POISON MYSTERY
TOWARDS the close of the year 192 1 a man namedEdward
Black was living with his wife and stepdaughter, Marian,
a girl of seventeen, at the village of Tregonissey, near St. AusteU
in Cornwall. Mr. and Mrs. Black were married in 1914, the
latter being her husband's senior by twenty years, and they
had lived together fairly happily, though quarrels about money
matters were frequent. Black carried on business as an in-
surance agent, and his affairs at this time were the reverse of
prosperous.
Mrs. Black had for some time been suffering from gastritis,
for which Black had often given her medicine and was very
insistent on her taking it. She complained more than once
to a neighbour, that the medicine given by her husband
always upset her and burned her throat.
On October 31, 1921, Black, as was his custom, prepared
the breakfast which consisted that morning of cake and bread-
and-butter, and made the tea. Within an hour after partaking
of the meal Mrs. Black was seized with vomiting and pain and
was obliged to take to her bed. As her condition did not
improve, a doctor was called in, but in spite of his efforts she
died after an illness of eleven days.
Before this happened, Black's money troubles had come
to a crisis, and following on discoveries made by the com-
pany for which he acted as agent, a warrant was issued
for his arrest on a charge of issuing non-existent insurance
policies.
Three days before his wife died. Black disappeared, and
after a search by the police he was finally traced to Liverpool.
When arrested in that city he attempted to commit suicide by
cutting his throat, and had to be taken to a hospital.
381
382 POISON MYSTERIES
Meanwhile, the circumstances under which Mrs. Black had
died appeared so suspicious that a post-mortem examination
was ordered, followed by an analysis of the organs of the body.
As a result of the investigation Black was charged at the in-
quest, which was deferred until he was sufficiently recovered
to be brought from Liverpool, with the murder of his wife by
the administration of arsenic.
The trial took place at Bodmin Assizes on February 2, 1922,
before Mr. Justice Rowlatt, Mr. Holman Gregory appearing
for the prosecution and Mr. Pratt for the defence.
Evidence was given by an assistant in a chemist's shop
in St. Austell, that on October 29, 1921, Black purchased
two ounces of white arsenic, saying he wanted it to kill rats,
and that although he was offered other preparations for
this purpose, he insisted upon having the arsenic, and duly
signed the poison register. Asked by the judge how much
two ounces of arsenic would make, the witness replied, " About
a heaped teaspoonful ; it would be 960 grains," upon which
the judge observed that would amount to nearly five hundred
fatal doses.
Counsel for the prosecution said that the fatal dose of
arsenic, which was about two grains, would just cover a three-
penny bit. The effect upon a person who had swallowed
arsenic would depend upon whether it was taken in a dry or
liquid state ; in liquid form on a empty stomach its effect
would be very rapid.
The doctor who attended Mrs. Black during her last illness
stated that at the post-mortem examination, it was found that
the heart was normal and that there was nothing to account
for the rapid action he had noticed during her illness. Ques-
tioned as to the presence of arsenic in some empty medicine
bottles which had been found in the house, he replied that it
was a common thing to find arsenic in bismuth in spite of
every precaution against impurity. The amount found in the
bottle, however, was i/2oth of a milligram, a milligram being
i/65th of a grain.
Mr. Webster, analyst to the Home Office, said he examined
the stomach, intestines, liver, and one kidney of the deceased
woman, • together with 6| fluid ounces of blood. He found
arsenic in all the organs, the total amount being i/i7th of a
A CORNISH POISON MYSTERY 383
grain, equivalent to i/6th of a grain in the whole body. Slight
traces of arsenic were found in the bottles and other articles
found in the house and brought to him by the police, but
that could not possibly account for the amount of arsenic found
by him in the organs of the deceased woman. The traces of
arsenic in these things were so small that they would not
affect the system at all ; to get a fatal dose from medicine
containing that proportion it would require 1,300 bottles.
The amounts found were consistent with the taking of a
poisonous dose, or a series of small doses which might produce
poisonous symptoms. If such doses had been taken they had
probably been well diluted. There was no direct evidence of
an irritant poison to be seen in the walls of the stomach or
the intestines. It was possible, however, for all the arsenic to
have disappeared, even if a fatal dose had been taken. It
would depend upon the time the patient lived, and a consider-
able quantity might have been vomited. He did not agree
with the counsel for the defence, who urged that arsenic
remained in the body indefinitely. In his opinion that was
not the case ; it was got rid of very quickly. Arsenic would
remain in the hair and nails for a considerable period, but after
a comparatively short time it could not be detected in the
organs.
Sir William Willcox, Consulting Medical Expert to the Home
Office, described the symptoms of arsenical poisoning. He
said that when a big dose was taken, death usually occurred
in three days, but in some cases the arsenic damaged the organs
of the body, and death might occur- several days after the
taking of the last dose. He had known cases in which some
months had ensued before death. In his opinion the cause of
death in this case was arsenical poisoning. He based his
opinion not only on symptoms but on the analysis. He
believed that no arsenic had been administered to Mrs. Black
within five days of her death. She had not died from the direct
effects of arsenical poisoning, but the cause of death was
exhaustion coupled with poisoning of the vital organs.
At the suggestion of the judge, Mr. Webster made three cups
of tea, one with two grains of arsenic in it, one with one grain,
and one with none, and these cups were handed to the judge
and jury for their inspection.
384 POISON MYSTERIES
Evidence was given by Mrs. Black's daughter, Marian, and
by the neighbours, showing that Black had on different occa-
sions administered medicine to his wife, and that she had
frequently complained of it being " peppery " and of her
dislike to taking it.
Counsel for the defence urged the lack of motive for the
crime, and suggested that death was due to gastritis, from
which disease Mrs. Black was known to have suffered.
On the second and last day of the trial. Black himself
went into the witness-box, and denied, as he had previously
done at the inquest, that he had ever had arsenic in his posses-
sion, or that he had purchased it at St. Austell on October 29.
He also added that on October 31 his wife was not present
at breakfast, but that it was taken up to her by Marian,
the girl.
The judge, in summing up the case, said that it was one of
circumstantial evidence. As a rule in such cases one found
motives included, but in this case there was none. There
was no doubt that Black's behaviour all through his wife's
illness was that of attention to her, and not either neglectful of
her or hostile to her.
The jury, after an absence of forty minutes, returned with
a verdict of " Guilty." Black was sentenced to death, and
was executed at Exeter Gaol on March 24, 1922.
In commenting on this case, in an address before the
Harveian Society, Sir WiUiam Willcox stated :
"it is interesting from the fact that although arsenic was
present in appreciable amount in all the organs, the total
amount found in them was considerably less than a possible
fatal dose. The explanation of the small amount of poison
in the body was clearly shown by the clinical history. The
case was one of delayed arsenical poisoning, a considerable
proportion of the arsenic having been got rid of by excretion
in the few days which elapsed between the administration of
the poison and the time of death."
CHAPTER XXII
THE ARMSTRONG CASE
IN 192 1 the little town of Hay in Breconshire became the
centre of one of the strangest poison dramas of modem
times. There were practising in the town two firms of
solicitors, the head of one being Mr. Robert Rowse Armstrong,
M.A., who had held a temporary commission as major during
the war, and was Clerk to the Bench. The principal of the
other was a Mr. Oswald Norman Martin, who, after demobiliza-
tion had entered into partnership with Mr. Robert T. Griffith,
who died in November, 1920, leaving Mr. Martin to carry
on the practice.
Mr. Martin was married on June 14, 192 1, to Miss Da vies,
the daughter of a local chemist, and Major Armstrong was
invited to the wedding reception and sent a present. Towards
the end of September a parcel arrived at Mr. Martin's house
addressed to him in block letters, apparently to disguise the
handwriting. It contained a box of Fuller's chocolates that
had come apparently direct from the makers. It was noticed,
however, that the ribbon securing the box had been untied
and retied in a different way, and anything that could lead
to the identification of the shop where it had been bought had
been taken away. The box was put on one side until October
8, when after a dinner party given by Mr. and Mrs. Martin,
it was handed round the table, but only one person, Mrs.
Gilbert Martin, a sister-in-law of the Martins, took anything
from it. Later that evening she was taken ill with vomiting,
and suffered from palpitation of the heart. After dinner,
the box of chocolates was again put away and nothing more
thought about it, until they were suspected of being the cause
of the lady's sudden seizure. The chocolates were then handed
over to Dr. Hincks, of Hay, who sent them to London to be
385 BB
386 POISON MYSTERIES
analysed. According to the report returned to him it was
found that in two of the chocolates in the upper row some
holes had been drilled about half an inch long, into each of
which several grains of white arsenic had been placed and an
attempt had then been made to fill up the ends of the holes
with pieces of chocolate.
About this time, it appears, Major Armstrong began to
press Mr. Martin very frequently to come and have tea with
him, and at length Mr. Martin agreed and went to Armstrong's
house about five o'clock on Wednesday afternoon, October
26. When he entered the drawing-room he noticed a three-
tier cake-stand on which were apparently some buttered
scones. Major Armstrong called for a cup of tea for him
and handed to his visitor one of the buttered scones from the
plate himself. He also had a piece of currant bread and but-
ter which was on a plate and left the house at half-past six,
but shortly after arriving home began to feel unwell. Towards
evening he got worse and about nine o'clock violent vomiting
set in which continued at frequent intervals throughout the
night. He also had attacks of palpitation and diarrhoea.
On Thursday morning the doctor was called in and he did
not recover sufficiently to return to business until November i.
The following day he met Armstrong, who asked him if he
was feeling better, and remarked, " It may seem a curious
thing to say, but you wiU have another attack," to which
Mr. Martin replied, " I hope not."
During the following three or four weeks, Armstrong
again repeatedly asked Mr. Martin to come to his house to
tea and extended the invitation also to his office, and seemed
particularly anxious that he should accept. About this time
there was some business between the two solicitors about a
sale of land, Mr. Martin acting for the purchaser and Mr.
Armstrong for the vendor. There had been very considerable
delay in completing the purchase and Mr. Martin had written,
that unless the completion took place, his clients would have
to rescind their contracts and demand the return of their
deposits in each case.
The completion had not taken place on October 20, and
Mr. Martin wrote formally giving notice to rescind the con-
tracts and demanding the return of the money paid on deposit
THE ARMSTRONG CASE 387
and expenses, which amounted to about £456. Armstrong
asked as a personal favour if this could not be postponed.
Mr. Martin's cHents decided not to consider the suggestion,
and thus the matter stood at the time.
On December 5 Mr. Martin wrote on behalf of his clients
to Armstrong's firm, threatening that, unless he received
a cheque for his clients' deposit by December 12, he would
have to take proceedings.
During Mr. Martin's illness the doctor attending him took
certain samples for analysis which were sent up to Dr. Willcox,
who found in the specimens one-thirty-third of a grain of
arsenic. Mrs. Martin, having mentioned to her mother about
her sister-in-law's illness after eating one of the chocolates,
gave the remainder of the box to her, and she showed it to
her husband, Mr. Davies, the chemist. In examining them he
noticed that one had a little white powder scattered over one
end, and that two of them certainly had been tampered with.
He thought that they looked very suspicious and so he took
them to Dr. Hincks, who sent the box with the remainder
of the chocolates to London to be analysed, the result of which
has been already stated.
The poHce were then informed and commenced to make
inquiries, with the result that detectives were called in from
Scotland Yard and Armstrong was arrested.
It was then found that Mr. Davies, the chemist in Hay,
had sold Armstrong arsenic in considerable quantities in 1913
and 1921, which he said he required for making weed-killer,
and following on what the police discovered they were led
to investigate the cause of the death of Armstrong's wife,
which had occurred about twelve months previously.
An order for exhumation of the body was given by the
Home Office and the internal organs were sent to London for
analysis. They were found to contain arsenic to the extent
of three and one-fifth grains.
While the charge of attempting to poison Mr. Martin was
in process of being heard before the magistrates, Armstrong
was charged with the murder of his wife.
Mrs. Armstrong was forty-seven years of age when she
died and had been married for about fifteen years. In 1919
she had first consulted Dr. Hincks, being troubled with
388 POISON MYSTERIES
neuritis in her left arm. After treating her for this complaint
the doctor did not see her again for nearly twelve months,
when he received a message from Armstrong to the effect
that his wife was suffering from pneumonia. A day or two
later he found she was suffering from delusions and that her
mental condition was apparently bad. He called in a col-
league and it became apparent to them that there was some-
thing additional to the mental trouble, as Mrs. Armstrong
had been taken ill with vomiting and complained of severe
pains and heart trouble. The doctors concluded she had
better be removed to an asylum and she was taken to Barn-
wood, near Gloucester. She was there confined to bed and
developed a sort of paralysis ; she was treated with tonics,
and one of these contained a small amount of solution of
arsenic. Her condition improved and the doctor told Arm-
strong that she would be able to go home on January ii,
and Armstrong went to the asylum and brought his wife
back to Hay. On that day it was found that Armstrong
had purchased a quarter of a pound of arsenic, and at one
time in conversation with the doctor had asked him how
much arsenic constituted a fatal dose. He also asked Dr.
Hincks to visit his wife occasionally and a nurse was engaged
to look after her.
For about a month she seemed to be getting better, then
in February the sickness and vomiting commenced again.
The doctor thought it was a case of severe biliousness, but
towards the end of February she got worse and died on the
22nd of that month. The doctor certified that she died from
gastritis and heart disease and at that time had not the slight-
est suspicion of foul play.
In 1919 Mrs. Armstrong made a will leaving some £2,419,
which was drawn up by her husband and witnessed by two
servants in the house.
In a previous will made in 1917, Armstrong was to receive
an annuity of fifty pounds a year, while the property was to
be divided equally between his children, but two years later
in the fresh will drawn up by her husband, she left all her
property to him. It transpired afterwards that the second
will was drawn up in Armstrong's own writing and purported
to be signed by two witnesses. Mrs. Armstrong was not
THE ARMSTRONG CASE 389
present and the two servants who signed it at the request
of Armstrong stated, that they did not know it was a will
they were witnessing.
To all appearances and in the opinion of her medical
adviser Mrs. Armstrong had died a natural death, but on
exhumation some ten months afterwards a sufficient amount of
arsenic was found in the remains to poison her. Almost
directly after his wife was buried and he had got the property
in his possession, Armstrong went to the Continent, and
immediately on his return at the end of April was talking
about marriage to another lady. It was noteworthy that
a packet containing white arsenic, not coloured, which chem-
ists are bound by law to do before selling it, was carried
by Armstrong in his pocket on the day on which he was
arrested. Also that Mr. Martin was nearly fatally poisoned
after taking tea with Armstrong, and that the amount of
arsenic, one thirty-third of a grain, which was found in the
specimen submitted for analysis pointed to the fact, that the
amount he had taken a few days before was a little over three
grains. It was also remarkable that after Armstrong had
asked Dr. Hincks " What is sufficient arsenic to cause
death ? " and was told three grains, that was the exact
amount that was found in a packet in his pocket.
Chief Inspector Crutchett, of Scotland Yard, saw Mr.
Armstrong at his office on December 31, and told him that he
was investigating the sudden illness of Mr. Martin after taking
tea with him on October 26. He also told him about the
chocolates which were found to contain arsenic, and it was
known that he had purchased arsenic on January 11, 1921.
He asked him if he could account for his movements on October
26, and what became of the arsenic that was in his possession.
Armstrong then made a statement that was taken down in
writing, and which he signed. In it he stated, that he also
partook of the buttered currant loaf and scones which he
handed to Mr. Martin, who he knew had not been well before
he paid the visit to his house. He acknowledged that he pur-
chased arsenic in 1914, which he used for making a weed-killer
consisting of caustic soda and arsenic which he found to be
cheaper than what he could purchase. He was unable to
throw any light on the finding of arsenic in Mr. Martin's
390 POISON MYSTERIES
tests or on the cause of his illness after visiting his house.
After signing the statement, Armstrong was arrested and
was asked to empty the contents of his pockets on to a desk.
Among the articles found in his possession was a small packet
containing a white powder and two or three little pellets,
rather heavy, which were in a small envelope, which also
had the remains of some white powder. The small packet
was found to contain 3 J grains of white arsenic.
At the magisterial inquiry, Mrs. Armstrong's sister said
that her sister was a believer in homoeopathic medicines,
and among them were arsenicum, nux vomica and liquorice,
which she not only used for herself, but the household generally.
The doctors who saw Mrs. Armstrong at the asylum and pre-
scribed for her, had ordered her a mixture containing solution
of arsenic, iron and ammonia citrate and nux vomica, the
solution of arsenic being in five-minim doses. She had
taken that medicine as a tonic up to October 4, but after
that date had taken nothing which contained arsenic.
Dr. Hincks, who had attended Mrs. Armstrong from 1919,
described her complaint and condition ; it was owing to her
mental trouble that he advised her removal to the asylum,
and at Armstrong's request he consented to her return
home. He saw her several times afterwards, but her physical
condition grew worse and she became weaker every day.
On February 16 he told her husband that her case was
quite hopeless and later he heard she was dead. He gave a
certificate that death was due to gastritis and heart disease.
His opinion now was that all these conditions were due to
the presence of chronic arsenical poisoning, and he thought
the cause of death was due to the administration of
arsenic.
Dr. B. H. Spilsbury, who made the post-mortem on the
body of Mrs. Armstrong after exhumation, said he found it
in an unusually good state of preservation, allowing for the
time which had elapsed since her death. It was a condition
which was found in certain cases of arsenical poisoning, to
which in his opinion her death was due. With reference to
the mixture which was prescribed for her at the asylum and
taken as a tonic for a period of some months, he stated that
in that small quantity he would not expect to find any traces
THE ARMSTRONG CASE 391
of arsenic in the body, with the possible exception of traces
in the nails and hair.
The official analyst to the Home Office, who had analysed
the chocolates sent to Mr. Martin, said that he found the
box contained thirty-two chocolates, two of which had the
appearance of having been tampered with. A cylindrical
hole nearly half an inch long had apparently been bored and
filled with a white powder, and attempts had been made to
seal it up with a covering of chocolate. The white powder
was found on analysis to be arsenious oxide. He estimated
that the amount in one chocolate was slightly more than two
grains. The rest of the chocolates showed no trace of having
been tampered with. He found arsenic in aU the organs of
Mrs. Armstrong's body, the total being equivalent to 3*2 grains,
which led him to believe that she must have had a consider-
able amount of arsenic during the last few days of her life, and
that her death was due to acute arsenical poisoning. A quan-
tity amounting to a fatal dose must have been taken within
twenty-four hours of her death.
The analyst also made an examination of a number of
bottles and packets found in Armstrong's house, most of
which contained arsenic either in solution or powder.
Sir Wnham H. Willcox, medical adviser to the Home
Office, said the mixture that contained arsenic prescribed
for Mrs. Armstrong at the asylum, could not have accounted
for the arsenic foimd in her body. Arsenic taken thus for
a month would be entirely eUminated, usually in ten days.
The symptoms described in the illness of Mrs. Gilbert Martin
after eating one of the chocolates, and those of Mr. Oswald
Martin, were aU consistent with acute arsenical poisoning.
He was of the opinion that Mrs. Armstrong was suffering
from the effects of an irritant poison when she was taken to
the asylum in August, 1920, and on her return home the
reappearance of these symptoms showed she was again suffer-
ing from arsenical poisoning. With respect to the distribu-
tion of the arsenic in the organs taken from the exhumed
body, he had no doubt that a possibly fatal dose of two grains
or more must have been taken within twenty-four hours
of death. He had known of cases of suicide where a large
dose or possibly two had been taken, but in this case there
392 POISON MYSTERIES
were obviously successive doses, giving rise to very painful
symptoms, which were not in the least indicative of suicide.
He did not believe it possible that she could have taken the
doses herself within twenty-four hours of death, and he was
confident that she was suffering from acute arsenical poisoning
when she died.
On this evidence Armstrong was committed to the Assizes
on the charge of murdering his wife and of the attempt to
murder Mr. Oswald Martin.
Armstrong's trial took place at the Hereford Assizes before
Mr. Justice Darling, on April 31. The case for the Crown
was conducted by Sir Ernest Pollock, K.C., and others, and
Armstrong was defended by Sir Henry Curtis Bennett,
K.C.
The nurse attending Mrs. Armstrong said, that her husband
frequently came into the bedroom the last few days of her
illness when she was confined to bed. He was alone with her
on several occasions and sat in the room when she went to
her meals. She noticed that sickness occurred about twenty
minutes after her patient had taken food. Mrs. Armstrong
kept a chest of homoeopathic medicines in the bedroom, but
up to the Sunday before she died she was unable to get out
of bed. She said she did not think it was possible that Mrs.
Armstrong on February 13 could have got out of bed and
got a packet or bottle out of the cupboard in the room ; she
had been told by the nurse who was previously in attendance
on Mrs. Armstrong, that she was afraid that she might some
time commit suicide, as she was certainly suffering from
delusions.
Chief Inspector Crutchett, who was present at the arrest
of Armstrong, said he had no opportunity after December
31 of going back to the house, but the house had been
searched and he was aware of a little drawer in the cup-
board in the study. Sir Henry Curtis Bennett then told him
that a small paper packet of white arsenic was found in that
drawer by Mr. Matthews, Armstrong's solicitor, his managing
clerk and Dr. Chivers. The inspector declared there was no
packet of white arsenic there when he searched the drawer.
Counsel remarked that there were actual traces of arsenic
in the drawer itself. In reply to the judge the inspector
THE ARMSTRONG CASE 393
said, that had the packet been in the drawer when he searched
he would have seen it.
A feature of the scientific evidence given by Mr. Webster
was the statement that he had never, in his experience of
making analyses of organs taken from three to four hundred
bodies, discovered such a quantity of arsenic as he did in the
case of Mrs. Armstrong.
Superintendent Weaver, who searched Armstrong's study
at his house, said that he had examined the little drawer
of the bureau in which it was stated a packet of white arsenic
was found after the police search. He distinctly remembered
pulling out the drawer and placing it on the desk, and was
positive there was no packet of white powder there.
The counsel for the prisoner in addressing the jury, asserted
that the suggestion that Mrs. Armstrong took arsenic herself ,
was infinitely stronger than the case made out against the
prisoner, and called Armstrong as a witness to give evidence
in his own defence.
Armstrong gave a detailed account of his career and war
service. He took his degree as Master of Arts at Cambridge
University, and had held important and responsible positions,
including that of Justices' Clerk of Hay. He was a partner in
the firm of Cheese & Armstrong until 1914, when Mr. Cheese
died. He married in June 1907 and had three children. He
held a commission in the Volunteer Forces of the R.E. until
1914 and was then gazetted captain. In June, 1918, he went
to France, where he remained until October of that year
and was demobilized in the spring of 1919.
Questioned about the second will in his own handwriting,
he said the reason for his wife's deciding to make a second
will was, that she had come into some further property since
the first will, owing to the death of her mother, and she wished
to make a shorter and simpler one. He drew up the docu-
ment at her request and with her full knowledge. He stated
that he first became aware that there was something wrong
with his wife on August 9, but he left her apparently in normal
health when he went out in the morning ; on coming back
for lunch she surprised him by saying before the children
she expected that he would have been arrested ; she had
done something to cause his arrest and had told the children
394 POISON MYSTERIES
they might never expect to see him again. This was the first
time he had ever noticed any active delusions, and as the
delusions did not diminish he saw Dr. Hincks and told him
what had occurred. Discussing the matter with a friend,
he had made the suggestion that it would not be safe to leave
razors about near his wife, and as a matter of fact, he had
removed them from the room and also his service revolver.
He denied emphatically that there was any truth in the
suggestion, that he had ever administered arsenic to his
wife prior to her removal to Barnwood Asylum.
Sir Henry Curtis Bennett, K.C., in his speech for the defence
said : " This case is a most extraordinary one, because the prose-
cution set out to prove that in August, 1920, Armstrong started
to administer arsenic to his wife ; that in January, 1921,
he continued, on her return from Barnwood Asylum, to admin-
ister poison to her ; and that finally she died as the result
of poison administered by him. They set out to prove that
and in doing so, they had not been able to make any suggestion
as to how Major Armstrong administered the poison, the
time he administered it, or in what it was administered."
Dealing with the purchase of arsenic, counsel said Major
Armstrong bought half a pound of arsenic coloured with
charcoal in June, 1919. Six out of these eight ounces he had
used for weed-killer, and the remainder was discovered in
the cupboard in the library. He bought some in 1921,
having forgotten that he still had a little left from 1919.
He returned from abroad in May and went to the cupboard
and found the packet with no string upon it, looking as though
it had been opened. He divided it into two parts. One
he used by dividing it into a number of tiny packets like the
one found upon him. These little packets he used in a way
advised by a chemical company, and he carried them in his
garden coat. It so happened that on December 31, he had
on that same garden coat and in one of the pockets he had,
together with his business and private letters, that little
packet of arsenic.
What happened to the other half of that arsenic ? Having
separated those packets for safety, he put that other little
packet, with the blue paper round it, in a little bottom drawer
in his bureau which was not a key-drawer at all.
THE ARMSTRONG CASE 395
On December 31 he was arrested. The next day he remem-
bered this httle packet and told Mr. Matthews his soHcitor
about it. Mr. Matthews went to the house and in the presence
of the housekeeper, Miss Penn, opened the drawer, but there
was no packet to be seen. They beheved the pohce had found
and taken it. Mr. Matthews then pressed the pohce for a
hst of things found in the house, and when he had got it, he
found that the packet of arsenic was not mentioned. On
February 9, therefore, he again went to the house, and going
to the bureau pulled the drawer out bodily, and in putting
his hand in to see if there might be a secret drawer, he found
the packet of arsenic, which had been caught up at the back.
" Thus," said counsel, " the last quarter of a pound of arsenic
bought by Armstrong was accounted for."
Armstrong, questioned as to what he did with the small
packets of arsenic he was said to have made up, declared
that he made these little packets simply by portioning out
a small quantity with his penknife. He had used them all
for killing weeds with the exception of the one that was found
in his pocket with his letters when he was arrested. It
was his custom to drive an old file into the ground over the
root and then drop in the contents of the small packet of
arsenic, so that it fell to the bottom or stuck to the side, and
he did this to any dandelion root he wished to kill. He
could not think how he used nineteen packets instead of
twenty, as he was under the impression that he had used them
all. When he was arrested and placed the contents of his
pockets on the table, he did not know the remaining small
packet of arsenic was there until he saw it and recognized
it. When he saw it, he then remembered about the two
ounces that he had left in the drawer of the bureau. He
did not tell the police that they would find white arsenic
in the bureau, but he realized that the finding of the packet
had placed him in a awkward situation.
Mr. Justice Darling questioned Armstrong very closely
about the purchase, use and discovery of the white arsenic.
He replied that previous to buying this quantity which he used
for killing dandelions, he had never had white arsenic in
his possession. He had used nineteen of the little packets
on nineteen dandelion roots.
396 POISON MYSTERIES
" Did you notice what became of the dandehons, did they
die ? " asked the judge.
" They did," repUed Armstrong.
" That was very interesting, was it not ? " remarked Mr.
Justice Darhng. " It was an interesting experiment to you
who wanted to get rid of the weeds ? "
" When you saw the little packet and realized you had
arsenic in your pocket, did you realize it was a fatal dose of
arsenic not for a dandelion but for a human being ? "
" No," replied Armstrong, " I did not realize that at all."
" But you had been making rather a study of arsenic ? "
" No."
" It appears now," said the Judge, " that if every one of
these little packets was the same as that found in your pocket
it contained a fatal dose of arsenic."
Armstrong replied that he realized that now but did not
do so at the time. He had not disclosed to the police that he
knew the arsenic was in the drawer, as he thought it was certain
they would find it.
Dr. F. S. Toogood, who was called for the defence, said
he was of the opinion that Mrs. Armstrong was suffering from
chronic indigestion. He thought that up to the time of her
removal to the asylum, she was not suffering from arsenical
poisoning, and up to February i6 there was no evidence of
anything consistent with it. In his opinion death was caused
by arsenic taken, about February i6, and if a dose was taken
on that date it would account for the amount found in the
body.
Dr. Ainslie, of Hereford, who was present at the post-
mortem, said that judging from the evidence of her last illness
and that of the post-mortem, he was perfectly satisfied that
Mrs. Armstrong had died after a large dose of arsenic which
was taken about February i6 or 17. He expressed dissatis-
faction over the preliminaries in the case of the test for Mr.
Martin, and said that there might have been arsenic in the glass
of which the bottle was made, as weU as in the medicines with
which Mr. Martin had been treated by Dr. Hincks. He was
questioned on the subject of arsenic being found in bismuth,
and agreed that two parts in one million was the amount
allowed. He referred to the possibility of impurity in the
THE ARMSTRONG CASE 397
supplies of bismuth from America available during the war.
Dr. J. Steed, the last witness for the defence, said he believed
that up to the time she was taken to the asylum, Mrs. Arm-
strong's condition was undoubtedly due to some internal
trouble, such as indigestion or a form of neuritis. He believed
the cause of her death was the taking of one large dose of
arsenic on February 16.
Sir Henry Curtis Bennett, in his final address, alluded to the
important point that had been made of the finding of the white
arsenic in the bureau after Armstrong's arrest. The evidence
for the prosecution had been that Armstrong had always
purchased coloured arsenic, and this discovery of white
arsenic was of the highest importance. Supposing that
packet of white arsenic, which undoubtedly was bought
from Mr. Davies, the chemist in Hay, had not been found, the
case would to a very large extent have been made to turn
upon how Armstrong came to be in possession of white
arsenic. He would have said : "I purchased it from Mr.
Davies." And the Attorney-General would have said : " That
cannot be true, produce some of it. Davies has sworn that
all the arsenic you purchased was coloured, and all we have
found was coloured." It would have been said : " It is all
very well for you, Armstrong, to say that you were buying your
arsenic openly in your own town. You must have gone
outside to make a secret purchase of arsenic." " And this is
the important part of the discovery of the white arsenic,"
concluded Sir Henry.
The Attorney-General, replying on behalf of the Crown,
admitted that the case for the prosecution had changed.
This, he affirmed, was a poisoning case, and he doubted if in
the history of the world the poisoned cup had been seen to
be poisoned, and when administered had been known to have
been poisoned. In the case of poisoners they would always
find subtlety and an endeavour to cover up things that were
sinister. He claimed that this case depended upon circum-
stantial evidence ; the prosecution had endeavoured to be
fair to the prisoner. The changes in the case were due to
the fact that they now knew, as they did not know at the
start, the defence would admit that Mrs. Armstrong died of
arsenical poisoning ; and they knew now, as they did not know
398 POISON MYSTERIES
before, that the defence was placing no rehance upon her
having taken homoeopathic medicines. He did not know
before, as he now knew, that in August, 1920, Armstrong was
possessed of two ounces of white arsenic, the balance of
what he had bought in 1919. He was also unaware before,
that in addition to the small packet that was found, he had
some arsenic, approximately two ounces, which he had bought
in 1920.
The central feature of the case was the defence of suicide
raised by Armstrong himself. One person, and one person
alone, was constantly about Mrs. Armstrong in August, 1920,
and again in January and February, 1921. " Let me,"
said the Attorney-General, " note a remarkable piece of evi-
dence. When Armstrong was asked if he was alone with
his wife, he replied, ' Yes, I was alone with her. There was
milk and soda in the room,' and when asked ' Did you ever
put a cup to her lips, did you ever minister to her, you the
devoted, loyal, faithful, loving husband ? ' his reply was
' No.' Can this be believed ? "
With regard to the Martin case, the Attorney-General
scouted the suggestion that the arsenic taken from Martin
came from a dirty bottle or cork or from impure chemicals
in his medicine. He believed the story of the twenty little
packets made up to kill dandelions on the lawn was a false-
hood.
The judge, in summing up, carefully sifted the whole of
the evidence that had been given. He stated that the ques-
tion to be decided was, had the prosecution proved that Arm-
strong gave his wife the poison. " The case was a deeply inter-
esting one, and he doubted if anyone had any recollection of so
remarkable a case in its incidents. It had been said that this
case depended upon circumstantial evidence, but circumstan-
tial evidence was as good as any other, provided it was relevant
and true. Circumstantial evidence going to prove the guilt
of a person was this : ' One witness proves one thing and
another witness proves another thing, and aU these things
prove to conviction beyond all reasonable doubt, but neither
of them separately proves the guilt of the person.' It should
be remembered that Armstrong was arrested not on the
charge of murdering his wife, but of attempting to murder
THE ARMSTRONG CASE 399
Mr. Martin. Having been arrested for an attempt to mur-
der Mr. Martin on December 31, only then was some one or
other led to think ' What about Mrs. Armstrong, what did she
die of ? ' The symptoms were very similar, so an order was
obtained and the body was exhumed on January 2, and it was
then found that there was still in that body a large dose of
arsenic, more arsenic than those who were accustomed to
dealing with these things had known in any exhumed body
before. There was no proof that there was any arsenic in
the cupboard in the bedroom, and there was evidence there
was arsenic in the cupboard in the room downstairs. It
was incredible, therefore, that a woman who was anxious
to get better committed suicide, and had taken a large dose
of arsenic two days previously. It was incredible that a
woman in the condition in which she was, could get up with
the intention of taking a dose of arsenic. Where had she
got it from ? She could not have taken the arsenic herself
within twenty-four hours of death. If Dr. Spilsbury's evidence
was true that was practically impossible."
The jury after retiring for forty-eight minutes found Arm-
strong guilty on the charge of wilfully murdering his wife,
and sentence of death was passed.
The trial lasted ten days, and the dramatic production
by Armstrong's counsel of the packet of two ounces of white
arsenic found by Armstrong's solicitor, wedged at the back
of the drawer of the bureau in Armstrong's study six weeks
after the police had searched and found nothing in that
drawer, was very unexpected. This packet of arsenic became
one of the outstanding features of the trial, and by the judge's
order the bureau was brought to a room adjoining the Court,
where a test was made. Armstrong was instructed to place
the packet of arsenic in the drawer where he stated it had
been, and afterwards Mr, Matthews, the solicitor, demon-
strated where he declared he had found it.
An appeal was made to the Court of Criminal Appeal,
when Sir Henry Curtis Bennett said that both Mr. Justice
Darling and the Attorney-General had ridiculed the state-
ment that Armstrong had made of his method of destroying
dandelions. He would produce five witnesses to prove that,,
far from being incredible, it was not an uncommon custom to
400 POISON MYSTERIES
give dandelions arsenic in small doses in the same manner
as Armstrong had described, when asked to account for the
packet containing three and three-quarter grains that was
found in his pocket. The court, however, ruled out any
further evidence.
The Lord Chief Justice remarked that a packet containing
3f grains of white arsenic was a very unusual thing to find in
a solicitor's pocket. Counsel observed that arsenic sufficient
to kill three thousand persons could be bought for 2s. 6d.
Sir Henry Curtis Bennett's speech in support of the appeal
lasted twelve hours, and in the course of his argument he
said : " Mrs. Armstrong went downstairs to get the arsenic;
she knew where it was kept, and on February i6 she had gone
downstairs and was teaching her little boy." Both packets
were in the cupboard in the room in which the boy was being
taught. Armstrong stated that in May he went to the cup-
board and found the packet in such a condition that it appeared
to have been tampered with. He suggested that on the day
and in the room where she was with the little boy, she took a
fatal dose of arsenic from the cupboard. From the point
of view of the defence, he argued, the finding of the arsenic
in the bureau was extraordinarily lucky, for there was till
then no evidence that Armstrong had any white arsenic at
all. The purchase on January ii was believed to be coloured
arsenic, and if this had not been found with the chemist's label,
there would have been a stronger case, that in addition to the
quarter-pound of coloured arsenic in January, Armstrong,
from an unknown source and for an unknown purpose, had
got white arsenic as well.
The Lord Chief Justice consulted with his colleagues and
said they were unanimously of the opinion that the appeal
must be dismissed. Armstrong suffered the extreme penalty
of the law and was hanged at Hereford.
CHAPTER XXIII
SOME POISON ASPECTS OF THE ILFORD
MURDER CASE
THE mystery surrounding the murder of Percy Thompson
at Ilford caused considerable interest in this country
towards the end of 1922. On the night of October 3rd,
Percy Thompson, a city clerk, when returning from the
theatre with his wife, was stabbed to death in a dark street
near his home in Endsleigh Gardens, Ilford. His body was
found propped up against a wall and by his side in a state
of hysteria stood his wife. It was first thought by the doctor
who had been called and made a brief examination in the
street by the light of a match, that death was due to internal
haemorrhage. It was only when the body was taken to the
mortuary that it was discovered that there were twelve or
fourteen wounds in the neck and' arms, and that the man
must have been killed by an assailant armed with a knife
or a stiletto. A few days later Frederick Bywaters, a young
ships' writer, was arrested and charged with the murder,
together with Mrs. Thompson, the widow of the murdered
man.
The youth of both — the man was only twenty, and the
woman twenty-seven years of age — who had apparently con-
spired together to carry out the crime, impressed the imag-
ination of the public to an unusual degree. When the case
came before the magistrates, the police produced an alleged
confession made by Bywaters, according to which he stated
he had become deeply attached to Mrs. Thompson, and
attacked her husband " because he never acted like a man to
his wife."
From a long series of letters which had passed between
Bywaters and Mrs. Thompson which were produced in Court,
the coroner, after consultation with the Home Office, decided
<01 cc
402 POISON MYSTERIES
that the body of Mr. Thompson should be exhumed and a
post-mortem examination made. From the contents of the
letters it appeared that Mrs. Thompson had for a considerable
period, with the connivance of Bywaters, been attempting to
put an end to the life of her husband.
These extraordinary letters, which were read in court,
contained allusions to several poisons and are noteworthy
from a toxicological point of view, as there is mention of the
use of powdered glass, which has rarely been employed for
criminal purposes in this country.
Bywaters and Mrs. Thompson were brought to trial at the
Old Bailey, the man being charged with murdering Percy
Thompson and conspiring and agreeing between June i, 1921,
and October 4, 1922, to murder him. Mrs. Thompson was
further charged with administering poison to her husband
between June i, 1921, and October 4, 1922, and inciting to
murder, also with soliciting and proposing to Bywaters,
her fellow prisoner, to murder her husband and agreeing
with him to murder her husband.
According to the Solicitor-General, who opened the case
for the Crown, although Bywaters' was the hand that struck
the blow, Mrs. Thompson's was the mind that conceived the
crime, a^d it was under her controlling influence that Bywaters
murdered the man.
The story as revealed at the trial was one of love and passion-
ate hate, recorded in the letters of Mrs. Thompson to her lover,
who, strangely enough, had preserved them, and thus stored
up indisputable evidence against them both, of their nefarious
plot against the life of the unfortunate man.
" He complained that it tasted bitter, as if something had
been put into it," is an extract from one letter of Mrs. Thomp-
son to Bywaters.
" I am going to try the glass again occasionally when it is
safe. I have an electric light globe this time " is from another.
Again she wrote " I used the light bulb three times ; the
first time he found a piece, so I have given it up until you come
home."
That B5rwaters had been aiding her was evidenced in another
letter in which she remarks, " I do not think we are failures in
other things and we must not be in this. The dose was enough
THE ILFORD MURDER CASE 403
for an elephant, but you did not allow for the taste making a
small quantity to be taken. I was buoyed with the hope of the
light bulb and I used a lot of big pieces, but it had no effect."
..." Would not the stuff make small pills coated with soap,
and dipped in liquorice. Try while you are away."
In other letters many suggestions were made by the woman
to encompass her husband's death, and in one which is worth
noting she alludes to a novel entitled " Bella Donna," and
quoted a passage which says " Digitaline is a cumulative
poison, harmless if taken once ; frequently repeated, it becomes
deadly." She referred constantly in other letters to this book.
In another she asks " Have you thought of bichloride of mer-
cury ? "
In a later letter allusion was made to aromatic tincture
of opium which she said her husband had in his possession.
In the cross-examination of Bywaters he stated that what
Mrs. Thompson alluded to in the letter was simply quinine,
and it was that to which she alluded when referring to the
dose being enough for an elephant.
Mrs. Thompson, giving evidence on her own behalf, denied
ever having any of the poisons mentioned in her possession
or using them.
Mr. Webster, analyst to the Home Office, said he had
examined the organs from the body of Percy Thompson
which was exhumed and found traces of an alkaloid giving
a reaction for morphine in the liver and kidneys, but no other
poisonous substances whatever.
Counsel recapitulated a remarkable list of the chemical
substances that had been mentioned in this case which
included hyoscine, cocaine, potassium cyanide, antimony
tartrate, bichloride of mercury, digitalin and aromatic tincture
of opium, all of which Mr. Webster had defined as poisons.
Counsel, when referring to the allusion to ground glass,
asked the analyst if he called that destructive and injurious,
to which he replied in the affirmative if the powder was
in fragmentary form. Administered as such it had been
known to cause death. He further added, that ground glass
if taken in any quantity might have a serious effect on
the linings of the stomach and intestines. He found no
evidence of any quantity having been taken in this case.
404 POISON MYSTERIES
Aromatic tincture of opium contained morphine and was
used as a sedative to relieve pain.
Dr. Spilsbury, who made the post-mortem examination,
said he found no signs of poisoning or scars in the intestines.
Asked " If glass was administered, would you necessarily
expect to find indications of it in the organs ? " he replied
that he would not, and went on to explain that the adminis-
tration of broken glass and powdered glass produced different
results. Large fragments of glass might produce injury by
cutting the wall of the gullet or intestines, and if not fatal,
scars might be found afterwards.
Given in powdered form, the immediate effect of powdered
glass would be to produce innumerable minute injuries to the
delicate membranes of the stomach and would result in illness.
If the person recovered, the glass would disappear entirely,
with the possible exception of the appendix, where it might
lodge and remain for a long time. He found no indication
of ground glass in the appendix in this case.
The Solicitor- General asked : " Is the negative result of your
examination consistent with glass having been adminis-
tered ? " — Dr. Spilsbury replied : " Some time previously,
yes."
" Is it possible that large pieces would have passed through
the system without injury to the organs or without leaving
any signs behind ? " — " It is possible," was the reply.
" Is the negative result of your examination also consistent
with powdered glass passing through the system ? " — " Yes."
Regarding the poisons, Dr. Spilsbury said he would not
expect necessarily to find indication of them if they were
administered a considerable time ago. Some poisons left no
trace at any time ; others produced an effect that might
last a few days, or even a few weeks, but after that, there
were few poisons which would leave indications, except those
that were corrosive or irritant. Hyoscine and cocaine were
not irritant poisons. Cyanide of potassium was irritant,
but he doubted if it would leave any permanent damage.
Counsel for the prisoner asked: "All that comes to this,
that there is no trace whatever, post-mortem, of any glass
having been administered ? " — " That is so," replied the
witness.
THE ILFORD MURDER CASE 405
The judge, in summing up the case, said the question the
jury would have to consider was, was it arranged between
Bywaters and Mrs. Thompson that the murder should be
committed. " If you think," he continued, " that the letters
of this woman are genuine and mean what they say, that would
mean that she was inciting the man Bywaters to assist her
in poisoning her husband. It might be that they found poison-
ing was no longer possible, and they might naturally turn
their minds to some other means to effect their object. These
letters form a very strong case, that the woman was writing
to this man, asking him to assist her to remove her husband
by the administration of poison. If they are accurate, she
administered it, but the important part is that she was plotting
and planning."
The jury returned a verdict of " Guilty," and both prisoners
were sentenced to death.
This case is noteworthy from the fact that the evidence of
attempted poisoning was entirely circumstantial. No one had
ever seen Mrs. Thompson in the possession of the poisons
mentioned in her letters, with the exception of the aromatic
tincture of opium, and there was no evidence to prove that she
had ever purchased them or administered them to her hus-
band, beyond that contained in her letters.
From this study of some of the more famous poison trials of
the past hundred years, it is clearly demonstrated that the
toxicologist and scientific chemist are the most formidable
enemies of the criminal poisoner.
It may be safely said, that the days have gone by when a
person could administer a poison with intent to kill, without
much fear of detection.
In the course of the past century, as science has advanced
and new poisonous substances have been discovered, the
chemist has been able to find a means of detecting nearly
every poison known to science. Even in those cases where the
poisoner has been one with skilled knowledge, and had the
means of choosing the most subtle weapon of its kind and
selected it with the greatest cunning, chemical experts have
yet been able to find and reveal the cause of death.
The criminal poisoner, like other murderers, generally
4o6 POISON MYSTERIES
leaves some indelible traces that eventually prove his guilt.
Such traces, as instanced in many cases, remain detectable
even after the lapse of years. Thus the chance of successfully
evading detection is gradually being reduced to a minimum,
and as time goes on it is hoped that it will be brought to a
practical impossibility.
INDEX
Abano, Petri de, 52
Aconite, 70
— how gathered, 72, 73
Act passed making poisoning
high treason, 186
Agra poisoning case, the, 372
Agrippina, 35
Ainos of Japan, 22
Albany, Duke of, poisoned, 142
Alexander, Prince, mysterious
death of, 108
Alexander the Great, 37
Alexander VI, Pope, death of, 133,
134
Alexipharmica, 42
Alfonso, Duke of Bisceglie, 129
Algaroth's powder, 98
" All Hallow E'en," superstitions
connected with, 214
Alraun, 67
American poison mysteries, 329
Andrew, Sir Euseby, strange case
of, 171
Antidotes to poison, 41, 42
Antimony, 98
— cups, 99
— in human beings, 99
— preservative properties of, 342
Aqua Toff ana, composition of, 125
Aquetta di Perugia, 126
Armstrong case, the, 385
Arrow poisons, 16
Arsenic, history of, 88
— against plague, 90
— as an amulet, 90
— contamination, risk of, 222
— eaters, 94
investigation of, 94 ,
— for cosmetic purposes, 93
Arsenic in sweets, 94
— in wallpapers, carpets, and
fabrics, 93
— use of in India, 89
— white, 89
Assay cups, 59
Atholl, Earl of, poisoned, 143
Bacon, Lord, on poisoning, 186
Bacteria, criminal poisoning with,
230
Banes, 16
Baroda, Gaekwar of, charged
with poisoning, 108
Bartlett, Adelaide, trial of, 303
Bezoar stones, 60, 61, 62
Bhang, 248
Black case, the, 381
Blessis and his death mirrors, 199
Boiling alive, penalty for poison-
ers, 1 88
Borgia, Cesare, 129
— family, 128
— Lucrezia, 129
— poison, composition of, 140,
141
Borri, Giuseppe Francesco, 178,
179
Botulism, 219
Boughton, Sir Theodosius, poi-
soned, 265
Bouillon, Duchesse de, 160
Boyle, Robert, 97
Bravo case, the, 282
Brinvilliers, Marquise de, life and
career of, 150
arrest and trial of, 156
Brittannicus poisoned, 35
Bull's blood, 32
407
4o8
INDEX
Bushmen, Australian, arrow poi-
sons, 17
— African, arrow poisons, 17, 18
Calabar bean, 24
Canaby case, 318
Cantarella, La, 140
Carlyle and " Grey Powder," 246
Carr, Robert, 104
Catharine de' Medici, 146
Celts, poison used by the, 17
Cesare Borgia, 129
crimes of, 130
death of, 138
■ prepares a poison, 131, 132
Chamhre Ardente, La, 149, 159,
160
Chapman, or Klosowski, case of,
337
Charms against poisons, 53
Chatillian, Cardinal, poisoned, 106
Chinese, poisons used by the, 38,
39
Chloral hydrate habit, the, 246
Chlorodyne habit, the, 242
Chloroform taking, 240, 241
Chlorpicrin, 225
Christison, 95
Cicuta, 31
Clark, Lieut., case of, 372
Cluny, Prior of, 145
Cocaine habit, the, 242
— and morphine, wholesale
smuggling of, 245
— smuggling, 243
cunning methods employed
in, 243
— trafhc, 245
Condorcet, suicide of, 205
Conium maculatum, see Cicuta
Cornelia and Serpi, 34
Corneto, Cardinal de, 132
Cornish poison mystery. A, 381
Cotta, Dr., 171
Council of Ten, 121
Cream, Neill, 314
— ^ his stethoscope and medi-
cine case. 316
Crippen case, the, 350
D'Albret, Jeanne, 145
Dalkeith coffee poison case, the,
369
D'Annunzio and his " Pharmic
Liberator," 126
D'Astrees, Gabrielle, death of,
146
Devereux case, the, 347
Di-chlorethyl sulphide, 225
Dioscorides,poisons mentioned by,
32, 33
Di-phosgene, 225
Donellan, Capt., executed, 271
Draconites, 62
Dri, a Romany poison, 87
Dumas, his description of poisons,
255, 256
Dunbar, Earl of, poisoned, 144
Egyptians, poisons used by the,
28
Electrum, 62
Elizabeth, Queen, attempt to
poison, 116
and Amy Robsart, 165
English surgeons experiment on
criminals, 11 1
Essex, Earl of, poisoned, 106
Ether drinking, 242
Exali, 148
Fallopius, tests on criminals,
no
Penning, Elizabeth, case of, 271
Fiction, poisons in, 254
Francis II, 145
Fresenius' work on arsenic, 95
Ganja, 248, 249
Gas helmets, 224
— mustard, 225
— shells, 224
Geber, see Jabir ibn Hayyan
Gherian ware, 60
Gilbert, Jeanne, case of, 321
Ginseng root, 215
INDEX
409
Girard, Henri, case of, 322
Glaser, 148
Gold leaf, suicide by, 38
Goldsmith and " James' Powder,"
247
Greeks, poisons used by the, 28, 29
Gula, Babylonian poison goddess,
26
Hashish, 248
— antiquity of, 249
— effects of, 250, 251
— smoking, in India, 248
Hebrew poisons, 28
Hellebore, black, 74
Hemlock, 31, 74
Henbane, 75
Henrietta Anne of England, death
of, 146, 147
Henry VIII apprehensive of
poison, 103
Hermes Trismegistos, 28
Hewitt case, the, 280
Hindus, poison used by, 37
Hofrichter, Lieut., charged with
poisoning, 193, 194
Horsford case, 291, 325
Hyoscine hydrobromide, 357
Hyoscyamus, 75
Ilford murder case, 401
Indians, North American, poi-
sons used by, 21, 22
— Californian, poisons used by,
22
— Jivaro, of the Amazon, poisons
used by, 21
— South American, poisons used
by, 21, 22
Inoculation with tuberculosis
bacilli, 227, 228
Irish poison mysteries, 345
Italian school of poisoners, 120
Jabir ibn Hayyan (Geber), 89
Japanese, poisons used by, 38, 39
Jean Douglas, Lady Glamis,
charged and condemned, 142
John, King, and Maud FitzWalter,
lOI
John of Ragusa, a professional
poisoner, 121
Kermes Mineral, 98
Kwang Su, Emperor, death of,
38
Lafarge, Madame, case of, 273
Lambeth poison mysteries, 314
Lamson, Dr., case of, 298
Laudanum, 81
La Vigoureux, 160
La Voisin, 149, 160
Lawford Hall, mystery of, 265
Leicester, Earl of, 105
" Leicester's Cold," 107
Leopold I, Emperor of ' Austria,
attempt to poison, 178
Le Sage, 160
Locusta, 35
Louis XVIII, attempt to poison,
162
Love charms, 215
— philtres, 211
■ danger of, 212
native, 215
plants used in, 214
poison in, 215
strange ingredients com-
posing, 213
Lucrezia Borgia, 129, 130
death of, 140
Luxembourg, Marshal de, 161
Macchiavelli, death of, 117
— his magic potion, 117
Malay poisons, 19
Mandrake, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68
Mantua, Marquis of, letters, 135
Mark Antony, 36
Marsh's test for arsenic, 95
Maybrick case, the, 308
— Mrs., her statement in court,
310
Mayerne, Sir Theodore Turquet
de, 97
410
INDEX
Medicine men, i6, 24
Melampus root, 74
Mercury, history of, 96.. 97
— as a charm, 98
• — first used in treatment of
syphilis, 97
Mescal buttons, 82
Methods employed by secret
poisoners, 198
Molineux, Roland B., case of, 329
Moray, Earl of, poisoned, 142
Morphine taking, 239
Moulton, Lord, on the Maybrick
case, 313
Muavi, 23
NiCANDER of Colophon, 42
poisonous substances
mentioned by, 43
Nigger Caeser's cure for poison,
48
Opium, 76, 77
— eating, 79, 238, 239
— introduction into India of,
78
— : smoking, 80
— use of in India, 80, 81
Orange, Prince of, attempt to
poison, 205
Ordeal poisons, 23
Orfila, 95
— and the Lafarge case, 277
Orkney, Earl of, poisoned, 144
Orpiment, 88
Ovambos, arrow poison used by
the, 18
Overbury, Sir Thomas, poisoning
of, 103
Oxford, Vice-Chancellor of, 195
Palmer, execution of, 291
Parysatis, Queen, 36
Pearson and Black, case of, 345
Persians, poisons used by, 36
Petrograd case, 230
Phocion, 29
Phosgene, 224
Pigmies, Central Africa, arrow
poison of the, 18
Pimlico mystery, the, 303
Pocula emetica, 99
Poison; definition of, 15
— duel between Court phy-
sicians, 36
— from a ceiling, 346
— gas, 223
attempted murder with,-
229
— habits, 238
— in a wooden leg, 208
— in beer, 216, 217
— in chocolates, 222
— in cocoa, 221
— in foods, 219
— in glass, 222
— in honey, 220
— in the chalice, 114
— laws in ancient times, 40
in Italy, 40
— mysteries, in France, 318
— plots, 186
against Austrian officers,
193
against cavalry horses, 228
against Fisher, Bishop of
Rochester, 186
against Ministers of State,
189
against the Chief Commis-
sioner of Metropolitan Police,
195
in Lima, 189
— — in Malta, 188
— rings, 203, 204, 207
a cardinal's, 207
Cesare Borgia's, 206
stories of, 207
— symptoms and signs of, 35
Poisoned bed, 209
— boots, 199
— candles, 182, 200
— chocolates given to 'bus girls,
228
— coins, 146
— court plaster, 227
INDEX
411
Poisoned cup, 199
— flowers, 209
— lavender, 208
— robe, 201
— shirts, 200
test by Dr. Nass, 200
— slipper, 201
— soup powder dropped by
enemy aircraft, 226
— sweets dropped by enemy
aircraft, 225, 226, 227
— torch, 208
— wine, 198
Poisoners of Rome, 122
Poisoning, dread of wholesale, 1 86
Poisonous grass as a defence, 87
— boot blacking, 203
Poisons used by ancient and
primitive races, 15
— concealed in flowers, 194
— dropped by aircraft, 225, 226
— in mythology, 27
— in warfare, 223
— preventive methods against,
49
— tried on criminals, 109
— used in France in seventeenth
and eighteenth centuries, 162
Pontaeus, a quack, challenges
the physicians of Oxford, 1 1 1
Porta, Baptiste, on poisons, 122
Poudre de succession, 161
Pritchard, Dr., case of, 293
Raspail and the Lafarge case, 276
Ravenna, Cardinal-Archbishop of,
no
Reinsch's test for arsenic, 95
Rhinoceros horn, 58
Robsart, Amy, mystery of the
death of, 164
burial of, 166
inquest on, 167
Roman Poison Laws, 40
Rome, mysterious deaths by
poison in, 34
Royal and historic poisoners, loi
Rugeley mystery, the, 287
Sainte-Croix, 150, 151
casket found after death
of, 154
contents and letter in
casket, 154
death of, 153
poisons used by, 155
Sassy bark, 23
Scotiney, Sir Walter de, 102
Scottish poison mysteries, 142
Scythians, poisons used by the,
17
Seddon case, the, 362
Seneca, 29
Sentence for poisoning, revision
after twenty-five years of a,
91
Sheffield, Lord, 107
Signs of death from poison, 41
Sirani, Elisabetta, death of, 118
Slow poisons, 15
Slow and time poisons, 113
origin of the tradi-
tion about, 113
Smith, Madeline, case of, 279
Socrates, death of, 29
Soissons, Comtesse de, 160
Somali, poisons used by the, 18
Somerset, Countess of, 103
Southwark poison mystery, the,
337
Spara, Hieronyma and her crimes,
115, 126
Spiders, poison lore of, 87
Stas' process, 95
State poison of the Greeks, 29
Stevenson, Dr., proves the pre-
sence of aconitine, 299
Suicides by poison, would-be, 92,
93
Superstitions connected with poi-
sonous plants, 53
Sussex, Earl of, 107
Tariff for poisoning, 121
Tartar emetic, 99
Terra Sigillata, 49
how it was tested, 50
412
INDEX
Theophrastus, poisons mentioned
by, 33, 34
Theriaca, 42, 43, 44
— eeremony of compounding, 46
— ■ Galen's test of, 45
— importation to London of, 47
— Mithridates', 44
■ — Philonium, 45
— of Andromachus, 45
— of Bologna, 46
— of Cairo, 47
— of Damocrates, 46
— of London, 47
— of Montpellier, 48
— of Venice, 46
— Zopyros', 44
Thoth, 28
Throgmorton, Sir Nicholas, 106
Toads, poison lore of, 84
— poisonous, principles extracted
from, 84
Loadstone rings, 54
Loadstones, 54
Loffana, 122
Lrial of venoms in 1432, no
Lrigg, Mr,, and Miss Loeser, the
mysterious case of, 332
Unicorn's horn, 55, 56, 57
Coronation Chair of, 58
cups made of, 56
Upas-tree, 20
ViscoNTi, Primi, 159
Westminster, Abbot of, poisoned,
102
Wheeldon trial, 190, 191
Willcox, Sir William H., on the
Seddon case, 368
— Black case, 384
Witch doctors, 24
Witches' hallucinations, 63
Women poisoners, 198
Wondreton's commission to poi-
son, 120
IVIotad W Bumr d Tanner Ltd.. from*.
/ ■'
University of Toronto
Library
DO NOT
REMOVE
THE
CARD
FROM
THIS
POCKET
Acme Library Card Pocket
Uader Pat. **Rcf. Indu FUt"
Made by LIBRARY BUREAU