Skip to main content

Full text of "Pollination of deciduous fruits by bees"

See other formats


CALIFORNIA 
AGRICULTURAL  EXTENSION  SERVICE 

CIRCULAR  62 

APRIL,  1932 


Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits 
by  Bees 

G.  L.  PHILP  and  G.  H.  VANSELL 


Cooperative  Extension  work  in  Agriculture  and  Home  Economics,  College  of  Agriculture, 
University  of  California,  and  United  States  Department  of  Agriculture  cooperating.  Distributed 
in  furtherance  of  the  Acts  of  Congress  of  May  8  and  June  30,  1914.  B.  H.  Crocheron,  Director, 
California  Agricultural  Extension  Service. 


THE  COLLEGE  OF  AGRICULTURE 

UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA 

BERKELEY,  CALIFORNIA 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2011  with  funding  from 

University  of  California,  Davis  Libraries 


http://www.archive.org/details/pollinationofdec62phil 


POLLINATION  OF   DECIDUOUS  FRUITS 

BY  BEES 


G.  L.  PHILPi  and  G.  H.  VANSELL2 


INTRODUCTION 

Most  fruit  growers  are  familiar  with  investigations  and  field 
studies  in  cross-pollination.  Beekeepers,  however,  are  generally  as 
unacquainted  with  the  details  of  fruit  pollination  as  are  the  fruit 
growers  with  bee  problems.  This  circular  attempts  to  summarize  the 
results  of  deciduous  fruit  pollination  studies  and  to  point  out  some 
bee  habits  and  structures,  with  special  reference  to  the  collection  and 
storage  of  pollen.  Such  a  paper  may  perhaps  serve  as  a  practical 
handbook  for  reference,  especially  in  the  field,  and  facilitate  satis- 
factory pollination  arrangements  between  fruitmen  and  beekeepers. 

The  pollination  data  have  been  prepared  by  the  first  author  from 
material  contained  in  various  California  Agricultural  Experiment 
Station  publications,  most  of  which  are  now  out  of  print,  and  sup- 
plemented with  unpublished  data  from  the  Division  of  Pomolgy. 
The  second  author  has  prepared  the  material  on  bee  habits  and 
structures. 


POLLINATION  SUMMARY  OF  DECIDUOUS  FRUITS 

Among  the  causes  responsible  for  nonbearing  of  deciduous  fruits 
are  lack  of  vigor  in  the  tree,  presence  of  injurious  insects  and 
diseases,  unfavorable  weather  at  blossoming  time,  winter  injury,  lack 
of  pollination,  and  inability  of  the  pollen  to  fertilize  the  ovule.  This 
discussion  will  deal  only  with  pollination  as  a  cause  of  nonbearing, 
it  being  assumed  that  the  orchard  is  planted  in  a  favorable  location 
and  that  the  trees  are  kept  in  normal  vigor  and  free  from  serious 
insect  and  disease  troubles. 


1  Associate  in  Pomology. 

2  Associate  in  Entomology ;  resigned. 


4  California  Agricultural  Extension  Service         l^'^-  62 

The  following'  definitions  may  clarify  the  discussion : 

Pollination^:  the  transfer  of  pollen  to  the  stigma;  or,  in  a  large  sense, 
the  distribution  of  pollen.  Pollination  may  be  accomplished  by  insects,  wind, 
gravity,  water,  artificial  methods   (in  experimental  work),  and  birds. 

Pollinizer :  a  plant   (tree)  used  to  furnish  pollen.     The  male  parent. 

Fertilisation:  the  union  of  the  male  germ  cell,  contained  in  the  pollen 
grain,  with  the  female  germ  cell  or  egg  in  the  ovary. 

Fruitful:  the  term  applied  to  a  plant  that  sets  and  matures  fruit. 

Unfruitful  or  barren:  terms  describing  a  plant  or  variety  that  is  unable 
to  set  fruit  and  mature  it. 

Fertility:  the  ability  not  only  to  set  and  mature  fruit  but  to  develop 
viable  seed. 

Sterility:    the  inability  to  set  and  mature  fruit  with  viable  seed. 

Self -fruitful:  the  term  applied  to  a  plant  that  sets  and  matures  fruit  with 
its  own  pollen. 

Self -unfruitful  or  self -barren:  terms  describing  a  plant  that  is  unable  to 
set  fruit  and  mature  it  with  its  own  pollen. 

Inter-fruitful :  the  term  applied  to  a  variety  capable  of  setting  and  matur- 
ing fruit  when  pollinized  with  a  different  variety. 

Inter-unfruitful  or  inter-barren:  terms  describing  a  variety  not  capable  of 
setting  and  maturing  fruit  when  pollinized  with  a  different  variety. 

The  reasons  for  nonbearing,  from  a  pollination  standpoint,  are 
not  all  known.  Some  of  them,  aside  from  weather  conditions,  are 
incompatibility,  imperfection  or  degeneration  of  sex  organs,  slow 
growth  of  the  pollen  tube,  and  premature  or  delayed  pollination. 

The  fruit  grower  has  a  pollination  problem  with  almonds,  cherries, 
plums  and  prunes,  apples,  pears,  and  berries.  In  general,  apricots, 
peaches,  and  walnuts  set  well  with  their  own  pollen  and  hence 
present  no  difficulties  from  this  standpoint.  The  J.  H.  Hale  peach, 
however,  is  self -unfruitful  and  must  be  interplanted  with  some  other 
variety.  Recent  studies  indicate  that  some  varieties  of  walnuts  in 
certain  years  do  not  mature  the  staminate  and  pistillate  flowers  at 
the  same  time  and  therefore,  under  these  conditions,  cannot  pollinate 
themselves. 

With  the  fruits  having  a  pollination  problem,  the  grower  must 
consider  the  following  factors  in  selecting  the  pollinizers :  coincidence 
of  bloom,  amount  of  pollen  produced,  germinability  of  pollen,  com- 
mercial value  of  pollinizer,  succession  in  ripening,  and  regularity  of 
production  of  the  pollinizers  used.  Varieties  which  do  not  blossom 
at  the  same  time  will  not  cross-pollinate  each  other. 


3  Pollination  experiments  and  investigations  include  not  only  the  study  of 
the  transfer  of  pollen  but  also  studies  of  fruit  setting  associated  with  pollen 
transfer  and  fertilization.  In  any  mention  of  pollination  studies  and  problems, 
this  broader  definition  will  be  intended. 


1932] 


Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees 


Most  fruits  with  showy  flowers  (fig.  1)  require  insects  to  carry  the 
pollen  from  flower  to  flower.  Bees  are  the  most  important  insects 
for  this  work.  The  grower  should  therefore  have  plenty  of  bees  in 
the  orchard  during  the  blossoming  period. 


Fig.  1. — Diagram  of  orange  flower  in  longitudinal  section  showing  location 
of  typical  floral  parts.  The  orange  blossom  has  been  used  rather  than  the  flower 
of  a  deciduous  fruit  because  it  shows  the  nectary  more  conspicuously. 

The  California  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  has  conducted 
pollination  experiments  with  certain  fruits.  The  results  may  be 
summarized  as  follows : 

ALMONDS 

The  following  varieties  of  almonds  are  self-unfruitful  under 
California  conditions  and  hence  should  not  be  planted  in  blocks  of 
one  variety: 


Big  White  Flat 

Golden  State 

King 

Nonpareil 

California 

Harriott 

Klondike 

Peerless 

Drake 

I.  X.  L. 

Lewelling 

Eeams 

Eureka 

Jordan 

Ne  Plus  Ultra 

Texas 

Some  varieties  of  almonds  are  inter-unfruitful- 
following  : 

Nonpareil  with   I.  X.  L. 
Languedoc  with  Texas 


-for  example,  the 


California  Agricultueal  Extension  Service        [Cte,  62 


llJ 


ex 

s 

_j 
CI 


-J 


s 

^ 

^ 

■ 

] 

^ 

i4 

i 

OC 

— H 

li^ 

^hH 

Ihl 

- 

4 

UUJ 

P 

^PiP. 

H^ 

■■■■■■■■■■■ 

i 

1 

i=     <r  CxCi   00<ON.<O--<000rv00<0<O<000C0Nr0NO(0t^<0 


lU  ?- tr  C^ 


1932] 


Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees 


Almonds  may  be  classed  as  early  or  late  in  time  of  blossoming,  as 
given  below.  Nonpareil  has  been  given  in  both  lists  since  it  occupies 
a  position  about  midway. 


Early 

Late 

Big  White  Flat 

Lewelling 

Dickinson 

Nonpareil 

California 

Ne  Plus  Ultra 

Drake 

fleams 

Harriott 

Nonpareil 

Eureka 

Sellers 

I.  X.  L. 

Peerless 

Golden  State 

Texas 

Jordan 

Princess 

Languedoe 

King 

Silver  Shell 

Klondike 

The  accompanying  chart,  figure  2,  gives  the  average  blossoming 
dates  of  certain  almond  varieties.  The  date  of  bloom  is  dependent 
upon  many  factors,  such  as  soil,  season,  and  location. 

With  the  exception  of  the  above-noted  cases  of  inter-unfruitf ulness, 
any  variety  in  either  of  the  above  lists  may  be  used  in  most  instances 
as  a  satisfactory  pollinizer  for  any  other  variety  in  the  same  list. 
Table  1,  compiled  from  the  experiments  of  Tufts  and  Philp,^  sum- 
marizes the  pollination  requirements  for  almonds.  Variety  names  at 
the  left  of  the  chart  indicate  the  tree,  and  the  names  across  the  top 
indicate  the  pollen  used.  For  example,  if  pollen  from  the  variety 
Drake  were  used  on  a  tree  of  the  variety  California  a  good  set  would 
result,  as  indicated  by  the  symbol  G  in  the  table. 


APPLES 


Although  this  is  not  a  complete  list,  apple  varieties  may  be  segre- 
gated according  to  their  pollination  requirements  as  follows: 


Self-fruitful 
Baldwin 
Early  Harvest 
Grimes   Golden 
Oldenburg 
Wagoner 
Wealthy 

Yellow  Newtown 
Yellow  Transparent 


Self -unfruitful 
Arkansas 
Arkansas  Black 
Delicious 
Fameuse 
Gravenstein 
Mcintosh 
Northern  Spy 
Khode  Island  Greening 
Stark 
Stayman 
Twenty  Ounce 
White  Pearmain 
Winesap 
Winter  Banana 
Yellow  Bellflower 


Doubtful 
Ben  Davis 
Esopus  Spitzenburg 
Gano 
Jonathan 
Eome  Beauty 
Tompkins  King 
York   Imperial 


4  Tufts,  W.  P.,  and  G.  L.  Philp. 
Bui.  346:1-35.    1922. 


Almond  pollination,    California  Agr.  Exp,  Sta. 


California  Agricultural  Extension  Service 


[Cur,.  62 


o 

Q 

o 

o 

o 

o 

w 


<D 

o 

Xfl 

s^xax 

M  ^  1 

o 

oo 

o 

1    i  o 

ipqs  -i^Aiig 

!  o   i 

sjanag 

O     i     i 

SUIB8H 

u^ 

o    I    iO 

ssaouijj 

!  f^      M 

o    ; 

SS8IJ88J 

M  ^  I 

M  ^     ;     M 

\M 

1  fe  O  o    ; 

i  \M 

iiaj^duo^      i  o  0  o  o    ;  O  f^  O    \ 

feooofeooo   io 

Bjcufi  snij  8>i      ^  fe  O    ; 

i  O  O  [x^  O  O  fi<  O  O  O  0  O  O     i     iO 

Sni|pAV8T; 

\       \\M       \       \       '■ 

;  O  fe  O     1 

oopanSuBT         M  O     ! 

o 

O  0 

o   1   |o 

8>tipuoi>i 

1    M    M  O    ; 

SUI>£ 

M  M  o 

o    ^ 

u^pjof 

:;x,0    1 

M  o  o   ! 

i  O  O  fe 

1  X  I 

i  O  O    ; 

;  O  O  PLH     : 

Px^  O  O  O  Ah 

o  M  o 

cj^oijjBH 

^   M   i 

\0\M      \     \ 

I  o 

8:>B^g  uapioo 

:       i       :       : 

^  M  M 

o 

^>l8ina 

Moo 

o 

Opx, 

\  o 

8>iBja 

i  o  o  o 

0   i  t^   M 

o 

;  p^  O  O 

0  p^  o  o 

BlUJOJIIBQ 

loo    : 

Mo^   ; 

O  p^  fe  O  fe 

o   M  o 

c>Bij8|iqAV§ia      o     M     : 

i  ^    !    M 

>1 

Big  White  Flat 

California 

Drake 

Eureka 

Golden  state 

Harriott 

Jordan 

King 

5  S 

3^ 

i 

!i 

< 

O  o3 

O  ^ 

I  Q 

O  * 


1932]  Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees  9 

The  varieties  in  the  self -fruitful  list  will  generally  produce  larger 
crops  when  cross-pollinated.  Under  most  conditions,  however,  com- 
mercial crops  will  result  when  they  are  planted  in  solid  blocks 
(self -pollinated). 

The  varieties  in  the  unfruitful  list  are  unsafe  to  plant  alone  and 
should  be  interplanted  with  some  other  variety  for  cross-pollination. 

The  varieties  in  the  doubtful  list  will  in  some  years,  under  certain 
conditions,  produce  commercial  crops.  The  evidence  indicates,  how- 
ever, that  better  commercial  crops  will  result  if  provisions  for  cross- 
pollination  are  made. 

Few  cases  of  inter-unfruitfulness  appear  among  apple  varieties. 
Winesap,  Arkansas,  Arkansas  Black,  and  Stayman  seem  to  be  inter- 
unfruitful  and  should  therefore  not  be  planted  together.  The  Arkan- 
sas, Stayman,  and  Gravenstein  are  generally  unsatisfactory  pollen 
producers,  a  fact  which  makes  them  undesirable  pollinizers  for  other 
varieties.  Except  for  the  cases  indicated  above,  varieties  which 
blossom  together  will  cross-pollinate  each  other.  The  Delicious  and 
Yellow  Newtown  seem  to  be  the  best  varieties  to,  cross-pollinate  the 
Gravenstein. 

CHERRrES 

All  commercial  varieties  of  sweet  cherries  are  self-unfruitful. 
Tests  show  that  the  following  are  self-unfruitful  under  California 
conditions : 

Abundance  Burbank  Mezel 

Advance  Chapman  Napoleon  (Royal  Ann) 

Bing  Centennial  Pontiac 

Black  Heart  Cleveland  Rockport 

Black  Republican  Early  Purple  Windsor 

Black  Bigarreau  Lambert  Wood 

Black  Tartarian  Major  Francis 

Some  varieties  of  sweet  cherry  are  inter-barren — for  example,  the 
following,  under  certain  conditions : 

Bing,  Lambert  and  Napoleon  with  each  other 
Rockport  with  Advance 
Early  Purple  with  Rockport 

There  are,  apparently,  different  strains  of  certain  cherry  varieties 
or  else  different  varieties  so  similar  as  to  be  indistinguishable.  This 
condition  exists  particularly  with  Black  Tartarian,  of  which  there 
are  at  least  five  strains  which  vary  greatly  in  their  ability  to  pollinize, 
especially  the  Napoleon.  More  than  one  strain  of  Black  Republican, 
from  a  pollination  standpoint,  exists. 


10 


California  Agricultural  Extension  Service         [C^ir-  62 


No  entirely  satisfactory  pollinizer  has  as  yet  been  determined  for 
Napoleon.  In  most  cases,  however,  certain  strains  of  Black  Tartarian 
and  Black  Republican  yield  satisfactory  results.  Findings  in  Oregon 
show  that  the  long-stemmed  Waterhonse  variety  is  a  fairly  good 
pollinizer  for  Napoleon. 

Cherry  varieties  may  be  classed  as  early  or  late  blossoming,  as 
follows : 

Early  Late 

Advance  Burbank  Bing  Pontiac 

Black  Heart  Chapman  Lambert  Rockport 

Black  Eepublican    Early  Purple  Napoleon 

Black  Tartarian 


PERioPorErT-ECTivE  Blooai  o{-  Cuuf\m  CuiiRRy  Varieties 

Vaca  VALLcy-CALiroR/iiA        1917  to  I920-1/sclv/5iv(: 


MARCH 


APR/L 


Black  Heart  a 

Black  tartaria;i  a 

Chapma/s  4 

APVA>NCIi  3 

Early  Pv/rple  a 

Dv/RBA/^K  4 

Black  Repwduc/^>n  a 

PoHr\f\c  4 

Bl/iG  4 

PiCWOLtOH  4 

rockfort  3 

Lambert  a 


•■•■■■■•■■■■■■■■■■. 


Fig.  3. — The  period  of  effective  bloom  of  certain  cherry  varieties,  covering  a 
period  in  nearly  all  cases  of  four  years.  The  number  of  years  averaged  is  shown 
in  a  separate  column  for  each  variety.   (From  Bui.  385.) 


Black  Tartarian  and  Black  Republican  generally  overlap  enough 
to  pollinize  most  varieties  in  the  second  column. 

The  accompanying  chart,  figure  3,  gives  the  average  period  of 
effective  bloom  for  certain  cherry  varieties.  The  term  effective  hloom 
indicates  the  length  of  time  the  tree  is  in  conspicuous  blossom. 

Table  2,  compiled  from  the  experiments  of  Tufts  and  Philp,^ 
summarizes  the  results  of  cherry  pollination.  In  some  cases  different 
results  may  be  secured  but  in  general  this  information  will  apply. 


5  Tufts,  W.  P.,  and  G.  L.  Philp.    Pollination  of  the  sweet  cherry. 
Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Bui.  385:1-28.    1925. 


California 


1932] 


Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees 


11 


TABLE  2 

Chart  Showing  Pollination  Compatibilities  of  Sweet  Cherries* 


Source  of  pollen 

Variety 

> 

< 

a 
S 

ll 

OS 

a 

a 
a 

O 

1 

> 

1 

4J 

s 

1 

a 

a 
S 

"o 

1 

a 

1 

a 

"a 

1 

1 

a 

0 

F 

O 

Advance 

o 

O 

G 
F 

G 
0 
0 
F 

0 



G 

0 

F 
G 
G 
P 

G 

F 

G 

0 

G 
F 
P 

G 
G 
G 
G 

0 

G 
G 
G 
G 
0 
G 
G 
F 

G 

P 

G 

G 
G 
G 
G 
F 
F 
P 
0 

0 
F 

Bing 

0 

0 

G 

Black  Heart 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

F 
F 
F 
O 

Black  Tartarian 

F 
F 
G 
P 

F 
0 
G 
P 

G 
G 
0 
P 

Chapman 

Early  Rivers 

0 

G 

0 
0 
G 
P 
0 
G 

0 

0 
0 
G 
F 
0 

G 
G 
0 
F 

F 
P 

0 
F 

Lambert 

G 

G 

0 

G 
P 
P 
0 

F 

F 

Pontiac 

G 



P 

F 

0 

Schmidt 

0 

0 

Windsor 

G-Good 

*  Data  from  Bui. 


F— Fair  P— Poor  O— No  affinity 

),  with  supplementary  data  prepared  by  G.  L.  Philp, 


PEARS 

Twenty-six  varieties  of  pears  have  been  tested  by  the  Pomology 
Division  under  various  California  conditions. 

Only  the  Hardy  variety  has  proved  to  be  self -fruitful  under  all 
conditions  and  during  all  seasons.  Fifteen  of  these  twenty-six 
varieties  tend,  under  certain  conditions,  toward  self-fruitfulness. 

Bartlett  pears  are,  to  a  certain  extent,  self-fruitful  under  valley 
conditions,  and,  in  most  instances,  self -barren  under  foothill  conditions. 

Winter  Nelis  showed  a  tendency  toward  self-unfruitfulness  under 
all  conditions  tested. 

No  cases  of  inter-barrenness  have  been  found  to  exist  between  pear 
varieties. 

A  summary  of  the  pollination  results  secured  by  Tufts  and  Philp^ 
segregates  pear  varieties  into  three  groups,  as  shown  in  table  3. 


6  Tufts,  W.  P.,  and  G.  L.  Philp.     Pear  pollination.     California  Agr.  Exp.  Sta. 
Bui.  373:1-36.    1923. 


12 


California  Agricultural  Extension  Service 


[Cm.  62 


Those  varieties  in  the  doubtful  list,  although  setting  satisfactory 
crops  under  certain  conditions,  should  for  best  crops  be  interplanted 
with  some  other  variety. 

TABLE  3 

Summary  of  Pollination  Eesults  with  Pears 


Self-barren 

Self-fruitful 

Doubtful 

Variety 

Years 
tested 

Variety 

Years 
tested 

Variety 

Number 
years 
self- 
fruitful 

Number 
years 
self- 
barren 

Alencon 

2 
2 
1 
1 
2 
3 
1 
3 

Cornice 

4 
1 
3 
3 

Angouleme 

1 
2 
5 
1 
1 
2 

2 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
3 

1 

Bloodgood 

Flemish  Beauty 

Hardy 

1 

B.  S.  Fox 

Bartlett 

2 

Comet 

Howell 

Bosc 

1 

Forelle 

Clapp  Favorite 

Clairgeau 

1 

LeConte 

2 

Madeline 

Col.  Wilder 

2 

Winter  Nelis 

2 

Easter 

2 

Gifford 

1 

Glou  Morceau 

Kieffer 

1 
4 

P.  Barry 

2 

Seckel 

1 

Pears  have,  in  most  cases,  a  comparatively  short  period  of  bloom. 
The  varieties  tested  may  be  divided  roughly  as  early  and  late 
blossoming,  as  follows : 


Early 

Late 

Alencon 

Angouleme 

An  j  ou 

Bartlett 

Bartlett 

Clairgeau 

Bloodgood 

Bosc 

Clapp  Favorite 

Easter 

B.  S.  Fox 

Comice 

Dana  Hovey 

Howell 

Comet 

Glou  Morceau 

Forelle 

Le  Conte 

Gifford 

Winter  Bartlett 

Kieffer 

P.  Barry 

Hardy 

Winter  Nelis 

Seckel 

Col.  Wilder 

The  following  varieties,  tested  under  California  conditions,  have 
proved  to  be  successful  poUinizers  for  the  Bartlett : 


Angouleme 

Anjou 

Bosc 

Clairgeau 

Howell 

Hardy 


Comice 
Dana  Hovey 
Easter 
Forelle 
Winter  Nelis 


1932] 


Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees 


13 


PLUMS    AND    PRUNES 

Nearly  all  Japanese  plums  are  self-unfruitful.  Methley,  Climax, 
Beauty,  and  Santa  Rosa  are  partially  self-fruitful.  Like  the  rest, 
however,  these  four  varieties  set  much  better  when  interplanted  for 
cross-pollination  purposes.  The  self-barren  list  of  Japanese  plums 
follows : 


Abundance 

Duarte 

Prize 

Amador 

El  Dorado 

Satsuma 

Apex 

Formosa 

Sultan 

Becky  Smith 

Gaviota 

Upright 

Burbank 

Kelsey 

Wickson 

Combination 

Los  Gatos 

The  early  Japanese  varieties,  being  usually  deficient  pollen  pro- 
ducers, are  unreliable  for  cross-pollination.  The  late  blossoming 
varieties  are  satisfactory  pollen  producers  and  may  be  interplanted 
safely.  The  Japanese  varieties  may  be  divided  as  early  or  late 
blossoming,  as  follows : 


Early 

Late 

Beauty 

Kelsey 

Abundance 

El  Dorado 

Combination 

Satsuma 

Amador 

Los  Gatos 

Formosa 

Santa  Rosa 

Apex 

Methley 

Gaviota 

Wickson 

Burbank 

Climax 

Duarte 

Prize 

Sultan 

Upright 

Formosa  and  Gaviota  are  apparently  inter-barren,  or  at  least 
unsafe  for  planting  together.  Tragedy  is  able  to  pollinate  several 
Japanese  varieties  but  is  not  pollinated  by  them.  Table  4,  by  Allen," 
summarizes  the  pollination  requirements  of  Japanese  plums. 


7  Allen,   F.   W,     Plum  growing   in  California.     California  Ext.   Cir.   34:1-65 
1929. 


14 


California  Agricultural  Extension  Service         [Cir.  62 


o 


1 

i 

uosjtoiM 

O     1 

ife     i  O  fe  PLh  O  O     jOfeOOO     iO 

1  Ph  o 

^qSiJdfi 

:    j 

:  O 

tjuins^'Bg 

!    !  ^ 

i  Ph 

i  Ph     i  o 

BSO^  B^UBg 

M   PM   tN       ! 

:  fe 

i  o  o   i  o  h  fe   i   i  i  px, 

1  P.  O 

azijj 

I  M  o 

^nm^w 

;    I  f^    1 

i 

so:>Bo  so-[ 

lo 

1  o    M 

A8sp5i         ipHpLH^OPiH^OCM     i     I^PhPh     i          ;Ph^     i^ 

-BiOIABQ 

\(^;^    1  cu  ^ 

iO     :     ioOPM     1         ipLnPL^Ot^ 

•BSOUIJOj^ 

:  fin  Pi<      i  Ph  PM 

ipL^     1     iOOP^     :         :PlhPl,puO 

J93UI5lO|l^ 

:     :  ^ 

opBjoQ  la 

:  Oh  ^      1  Pm  Ph 

PIhO     ipM^PM     :         jpL,PL<     ;Ph 

e^Bna 

:  t^     i  O  O 

O     M  O  O 

\    \    \    \^ 

uoic>Buiqmo3 

:  ^ 

xBuiiQ       O  O 

fe  o  o 

o  o  n 

;  Ph 

>IuBqana 

ta    i 

0  fe  o  o 

o   M  o  fe 

O  O     ;  ^ 

;  t^ 

q^iuig  AJioag         i  O 

o 

A^n^ag 

fx,    1  o  o 

O     :     ;  fe  O  t^     ;  O     1  O 

:  Pi^ 

xady 

;  O  Pu    ;  pli  Ph 

pL,     i     ipL,fiHPH     :0     ;PupL^     Ipm 

aopBuiy 

i  O 

o 

aouepunqy       q 

JPS 

ooo^=^ooOoooooooo^i^ofeooo 

Abundance 

Amador 

Apex 

1 

4  \ 

II 

n  0) 

6 

i 
1 

c3 

Q 

El  Dorado 

Flickinger 

Formosa 

.2 

s 

i 

Los  Gatos 

Methley "JI" 

Prize 

S 

3 

u 

H 

.  s 


Ph    5 


S  =! 


o  •*: 

0  c3 

9  ^ 

1  Q 

o  • 


1932] 


Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees 


15 


European  plums  (including  prunes)  may  be  classed  as  self -barren, 
self -fruitful,  or  doubtful,  as  follows: 


Self -barren 
Anita 
Burton 
Clyman 
Diamond 

Fellenberg  (Italian) 
Imperial 
Jefferson 
President 
Robe  de  Sergeant 
Quackenboss 
Silver 
Standard 
Sultan 
Tragedy 
Washington 


Self-fruitful 
California  Blue 
Coates  1418  (Double  X) 
French 
Giant 
Sugar 
Yellow  Egg 


Doubtful 
Conquest 
Grand  Duke 
Pond    (Hungarian) 
Stuart 


The  doubtful  list  includes  varieties  which  in  some  years  may  pro- 
duce satisfactory  crops  with  their  own  pollen  but  which  one  should 
probably  not  plant  without  providing  for  cross-pollination. 

There  is  apparently  no  inter-unfruitfulness  among-  Europeon 
plums.  In  some  years,  however,  certain  varieties  do  not  set  satisfac- 
tory crops.  In  general,  varieties  blossoming  at  the  same  time  will 
cross-pollinate  effectively.  Although  this  is  not  a  complete  list,  the 
following  varieties  may  be  grouped  together  according  to  the  time 
of  blossoming: 


Early 


Clyman 
Tragedy 


Mid-season 
Burton 

Coates  1418  (Double  X) 
Diamond 
French 
Grand  Duke 
Imperial 
Jefferson 
Eobe  de  Sergeant 
Sugar 
Standard 
Stuart 


Late 
California  Blue 
Fellenberg   (Italian) 
Giant 
President 

Pond  (Hungarian) 
Quackenboss 
Silver 

Washington 
Yellow  Egg 


Table  5,  by  Allen, ^  summarizes  the  pollination  requirements  of 
■European  plums. 


8  Allen,   F.   W.     Plum   growing   in   California.    California   Ext.    Cir.    34 : 1-65. 
1929. 


16 


California  Agricultural  Extension  Service 


[Cm.  62 


1 

3 

SSg  MonaA 

MMIMMM^f^MMMMf^i^ 

uo^uiqs'BjW 

.  M  M  M  M  M  M  M  M  M  M  M  o  i 

XpaSBJx 

ioMoMioMiP^iOMMMoM 

UB^jng 

M  M  M  M  M  M  M  M  M  M  o  1  M 

j'BSng 

OO     I     iOO     i     iO     ;     :taO     ;0     :0     lOO     i  O     i  Ph     M 

-^j^n^g 

^oMiMMMMMjMoop^MjM 

pjBpu^;g 

p^ 

M  M  M  ;  M  M  M  M  M  ^  M  M  M 

jopuajdg 

iOMMMMMMoiMooMMM 

Ja^iig 

M  i  M  ^  M  :  M  M  M  p^  M  M  M  M 

^UB83 

-J8g  ap  aso^ 

; 

MMM^MiMMp^MM^I^M 

ssoquajjo'BnJ^ 

M    M    M    M    M    M  p^  ph    M    M    M    M    M 

^uapieajj 

; 

^IMoMioMiOoMMMMM 

puoj 

:^M:MMMf^f^:^MMMp^M> 

uosjajgaf 

M  M  M  M  M  p^  M  M  M  M  M  i  M 

jBuaduii 

o;oiMoMoop^O:MMooMM 

ububSuuh 

;^MMMMM^;^MMMMU 

a>ina  puBjQ 

feoMoMioHMfeOoiMMMfei; 

^ti^IO 

\ 

oMMM^^M^^MMMMiM 

qouajj      OO     i     \\^0     \     ;p^     i     \  i^     \     jO     ;0     iOO     ;0     M         U 

(UBip^l) 

Sjaquanaj 

;  M  M^  M  i  M  M  M^  M  M  |%M  1 

pUOtUBlQ 

ooMfe;MoiMooMio»,M:kDM 

■i^sanbuoQ 

•  M^  M  M  !  M  M  M  M     1  MM  1  h 

81^1  sa^BOQ 

:  M  M  M  M  M  M  M  M    o  MXI  M 

UBUlA^Q 

:  o   M   M   M  fx.   i   M  fe   M   i   MVM   ;>o   1   1 

9"ia 

■BtUJOjqBQ 

oMi^Mi^M'^^'^MMMrMh 

uo^jng 

i  ^  M  M  M  M  M  M  o  M  M  1  M  M  M 

■B^iuy 

Ph 

M  M  M  M  M  M  M  M  ^  ^  M  M  M 

JPS 

pHA^OOP^PMfs^pHfeOpLHOPHfeOPHpLHpHOO^lHOOOOO 

.2 

11 

-^  p: 

California  Blue 

Clyman 

Coates  1418 

Conquest 

Diamond 

Fellenberg  (Italian) 

French 

Giant ; 

Grand  Duke 

Imperial ... 

Jefferson 

Pond  (Hungarian) 

President , 

Quackenboss 

Robe  de  Sergeant 

Silver 

Splendor 

Standard 

Stuart 

Sugar 

Sultan 

Tragedy 

Washington 

Yellow  Egg 

1932]  Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees  17 


ARRANGEMENT  OF    POLLINIZERS 

In  planting"  an  orchard  where  poUinizers  are  required,  one  should, 
if  possible,  have  every  sixth  and  preferably  every  fourth  row  a  pollin- 
izing"  variety.  For  convenience  in  harvesting  it  is  best  to  plant  two, 
four,  or  six  rows  of  one  kind,  then  two  of  the  pollinizing  variety,  and 
repeat.  In  some  instances  it  is  desirable  to  have  a  minimum  number 
of  pollinizers.  Under  these  circumstances,  one  tree  to  eight,  planted 
as  every  third  tree  in  every  third  row,  is  recommended.  This  arrange- 
ment places  a  pollinizer  next  to  every  tree  of  the  main  variety  in 
the  orchard. 

Certain  conditions  may  make  it  advisable  to  graft  a  pollinizer 
into  every  tree  to  insure  satisfactory  cross-pollination.  Such  an 
arrangement  will,  of  course,  tend  toward  confusion  in  harvesting ; 
when  the  pollination  problem  is  serious,  however,  the  grower  can  afford 
to  forget  the  commercial  value  of  the  fruit  on  the  pollinizing  branch. 

The  suggestion  given  above  is  primarily  for  the  orchardist  whose 
mature  trees,  because  of  the  planting  of  self  or  inter-barren  varieties, 
have  failed  to  fruit.  During  the  years  when  one  is  waiting  for  the 
trees  grafted  over  to  pollinizing  varieties  to  come  into  bearing,  some 
relief  may  be  obtained  by  cutting  off  branches  of  pollinizing  varieties, 
placing  the  cut  ends  into  vessels  of  water,  and  distributing  them 
throughout  the  orchard  during  the  blossom  period.  Such  branches 
will  live  for  several  days  and  continue  to  bloom,  forming  pollen  for 
the  bees  to  transfer  to  the  unfruitful  varietv. 


THE  HONEYBEE  AS  A  POLLEN  DISTRIBUTOR 

The  intimate  relationship  between  bee  life  and  plants  is  well  known 
to  students  of  nature.  Certain  bees  require  pollen  and  nectar  for 
sustaining  life;  the  pollen,  in  the  case  of  the  hive  bee,  is  fed,  along 
with  other  substances,  to  the  larval  forms;  while  nectar  is  converted 
to  honey  primarily  for  adult  food.  In  many  cases,  the  plants  require 
the  pollen  from  other  varieties  of  the  species  for  the  setting  of  fruit 
and  seed.  Nectar,  a  weak  sugar  solution,  attracts  many  insects ;  and 
its  presence  in  close  proximity  to  the  stamens  better  assures  visitation 
by  the  living  pollen  carriers.  The  bee  wholly  depends  for  existence 
upon  the  plant  products — pollen  and  nectar ;  while,  on  the  other  hand, 
many  plants  would  fail  in  productivity^  except  for  the  presence  of 
insects  suitable  for  effecting  cross-pollination. 


18 


California  Agricultural  Extension  Service 


[Cm.  62 


POLLEN   MANIPULATION  BY  THE  BEE 

The  structures  over  the  body  of  the  worker  bee  are  admirably 
designed  for  the  efficient  collection  and  transportation  of  pollen.  In 
the  first  place,  the  whole  body  is  densely  clothed  with  hairs  (fig.  4), 


Fig.  4. — The  body  of  the  hive  bee  is  completely  covered  with  hair,  in  which 
the  pollen  grains  become  entangled.  The  bee,  before  it  starts  its  return  flight  to 
the  hive,  combs  the  grains  into  the  pollen  basket.    See  figure  7. 

which  are  barbed  in  such  a  way  that  pollen  grains  of  varying  size 
(figs.  5  and  6)  cling  to  them.  The  legs,  too,  bear  pollen-manipulating 
devices :  each  front  leg,  for  example,  has  a  notch  of  the  proper  diame- 
ter for  stripping  the  antennae  clean ;  the  middle  and  hind  legs  have 
spines,  spoon-shaped  depressions  (called  pollen  baskets),  hair 
combers,  etc. 

The  bee  partially  cleans  its  body  of  pollen  grains  by  means  of  the 
combs  and  other  structures.  A  large  ball  of  pollen  is  finally  formed 
in  the  pollen  basket,  on  the  outside  of  each  rear  tibia  (fig.  7),  from 
which  it  is  removed  after  being  carried  to  the  hive.  Many  pollen 
grains  remain  scattered  over  the  bee's  body,  even  after  combing,  and 
it  is  believed  that  it  is  this  pollen  which  effects  cross-pollination. 
The  labor  and  time  expended  in  collecting  a  load  of  pollen  are  con- 


1932] 


Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees 


19 


Fig.  5. — Photograph  of  femur  from  a  bee 's  leg,  showing  hairs  with  pollen 
grains  from  some  plant.  This  field  bee  was  caught  entering  the  hive,  as  it 
returned  from  a  collecting  trip.  These  grains  come  in  contact  with  the  viscid 
surface  of  the  stigma  as  the  bee  pushes  into  the  blossom  for  nectar  or  pollen,  and 
bring  about  cross-pollination.     Also  see  figure  6. 


Fig.  6. — Diagrammatic  sketches  showing  arrangement  of  barbs  on  the  hairs 
of  bees.  The  pollen  grains  cling  on  the  hair  between  these  barbs.  The  irregular 
spacing  of  barbs  on  the  hair  shaft  is  an  adaptation  suited  to  picking  up  pollen 
grains  of  varying  size  and  shape.  See  also  figures  5  and  8. 


20 


California  Agricultural  Extension  Service         [Cm-  62 


Fig.  7. — Hind  legs  of  hive  bee  with  large  mass  of  pollen  in  the  pollen  basket 
upon  the  outside  of  the  tibia.  Note  the  combs  on  the  first  tarsal  segment.  The 
parts  of  the  leg  are  the  coxa  (a),  the  trochanter  (b),  the  femur  (c),  the  tibia 
(d),  and  the  five  tarsal  segments  (e). 


1932] 


Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees 


21 


S 


%^ 


a  b  ll^         ^ 


A 


^  #  ^^P 


W*^ 


«! 


Fig.  8. — Photographs  of  pollen  grains,  indicating  comparative  size  and  shape: 
(a)  cherry,  (b)  almond,  (c)  hollyhock,  (d)  olive,  and  (e)  date  palm.  Magnifica- 
tion of  all,  X  250.   Also  see  figures  5  and  6. 


22  California  Agricultural  Extension  Service         [CiR-  62 

siderable:  often  a  bee  spends  an  hour  in  workings  over  the  anthers 
of  the  blossoms  (fig*.  1)  before  returning  to  the  hive.  The  different 
kinds  of  pollen  (fig.  8)  are  stored  in  the  cells  of  the  comb  until  needed 
for  feeding  the  bee  larvae.  Pollens  from  different  plant  species  are 
of  various  color  (white,  yellow^,  brow^n,  blue,  red,  etc.),  a  fact  which 
facilitates  their  identification  in  the  comb  cells. 

SOME    COLLECTING    HABITS    OF    BEES    OF    VALUE    IN 
FRUIT   POLLINATION 

Bees,  whether  collecting  pollen  or  nectar,  usually  visit  on  a  par- 
ticular trip  but  one  species  of  plant.  Where  blossoms  are  scarce, 
the  bee  may  be  forced  to  collect  from  more  than  one  species;  but 
such  is  not  the  case  during  fruit  blossoming.  Some  species  of  plants 
are  definitely  preferred  to  others.  The  time  of  day  influences 
availability  of  both  nectar  and  pollen,  so  that  activity  shifts  from  one 
plant  to  another :  for  example,  filaree,  in  the  orchards,  is  very  attrac- 
tive during  the  early  morning;  but  most  of  the  blossoms  close  by  10 
o'clock  on  sunny  days.  Apparently  some  of  the  fruits  secrete  nectar 
most  freely  during  the  night ;  bees  quickly  harvest  this  in  the  morning 
and  then  shift  to  some  other  plant.  During  certain  seasons,  for 
example,  this  change  from  prunes  to  mustard  is  particularly  noticeable. 
Very  often  pear  blossoms  are  less  attractive  than  others  which  are 
open  at  the  same  time.  Bees  like  apple  blossoms  particularly :  they 
will  sometimes  leave  pear  for  cherry  and  cherry  for  apple.  In  certain 
areas,  at  least,  bees  visit  pear  blossoms  for  pollen  only,  ignoring  the 
nectar  which  is  plainly  visible.  Some  recent  work  indicates  a  vari- 
ation in  sugar  concentration  for  various  nectars,  which  may  explain 
the  periodic  preference  shown  by  bees  for  certain  flowers. 

SPRAYING  DETRIMENTAL  TO  BEES 

The  problem  of  spray  poisoning  is  often  acute  for  bees  near 
orchards  where  arsenic  or  nicotine  is  used  on  the  plants.  Not  only  are 
the  nectar  and  pollen  of  trees  contaminated,  but  those  of  the  covercrop 
as  well.  In  addition,  bees  drink  up  dew  from  leaves  and  thus  may 
secure  a  fatal  dosage  of  poison,  so  that  one  cannot  entirely  eliminate 
this  source  of  loss  even  by  properly  timed  spraying-.  Wherever  cover- 
crops  occur  in  orchards,  the  spray  poison  problem  is  particularly 
serious.  Beekeepers  and  fruit  growers  must,  in  short,  cooperate  if  loss 
of  bees  is  to  be  reduced  to  a  minimum;  and  the  beekeeper  should 
receive  timely  warning  to  move  out  before  spraying  operations  begin. 


1932] 


Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees 


23 


SET  OF  FRUIT  NOT  DEPENDENT  UPON  BEES  ALONE 

The  need  for  more  insects  to  bring  about  cross-pollination  in  areas 
of  fruit  concentration  is  well  recognized  by  scientific  workers  and 
many  orchardists.  One  must  emphasize  the  fact  that  a  supply  of  pol- 
linating insects  alone  is  not  sufficient  to  cause  a  commercial  set  of 
fruit,  but  that  other  factors,  such  as  favorable  weather  and  suitable 
varieties  properly  planted,  are  also  important.  The  fact  that  hive 
bees  are  efficient  pollen  distributors  which  can  be  placed  where  and 
when  wanted,  needs  only  to  be  mentioned. 


^^^•••••» 


Fig.  9. — A  bee  comb  illustrating  the  large  area  occupied  by  brood  during  fruit 
blossoming  time;  five  to  ten  combs  are  necessary.  Both  sealed  (a)  and  unsealed 
brood  cells  (b)  as  well  as  honey  (upper  left)  may  be  seen.  During  periods  of 
low  temperature,  as  often  occur  during  fruit  blossoming  time,  all  the  bees  in  a 
weak  colony  may  be  needed  in  the  hive  to  keep  up  the  temperature  for  brood; 
therefore,  it  is  only  in  the  case  of  strong  colonies  that  there  are  bees  available 
for  field  work. 


BEEKEEPING   A   SPECIALTY 

The  fruit-grower  is  usually  too  busy  with  orchard  problems  to 
become  an  efficient  beekeeper.  Bees  require  considerable  attention 
throughout  the  year  if  they  are  to  be  strong  in  numbers  at  the  end  of 
winter.  Only  strong  colonies  will  prove  of  much  value  during  early 
spring,  when  a  large  number  of  bees  are  required  in  the  hive  to  main- 
tain the  brood  nest  temperature  at  95°  F  (fig.  9).    Generally,  the  most 


24  California  Agricultural  Extension  Service         [C^R-  62 

feasible  plan  for  securing  pollinating  insects  is  to  rent  bees  from 
highly  skilled  beekeepers.  The  importance  of  an  early  agreement  must 
be  stressed,  because  many  cases  of  bee  shortage  are  annually  reported 
too  late  for  correction. 


NUMBER   OF   BEES    REQUIRED    FOR   POLLINATION 

The  usual  recommendations  call  for  one  colony  of  bees  to  the  acre 
of  fruit  to  be  pollinated.  The  condition  of  the  weather  so  affects 
results,  however,  that  often  more  bees  would  justify  their  cost,  while  at 
other  times  even  the  prescribed  number  probably  exceeds  actual  re- 
quirements. According  to  one  beekeeper  at  Oroville,  a  section  near 
him  has  10,000  acres  of  prunes  and  3,000  acres  of  pears  with  a  bee 
population  of  only  1,000  colonies  (1930).  This  number  of  bees  must 
certainly  be  inadequate  for  best  results,  particularly  when  the  general 
insect  population,  because  of  weather  conditions  or  other  cause,  is  low. 
Table  6  shows  the  acreage  of  fruits  (exclusive  of  grapes)  and  the  reg- 
istered number  of  colonies  of  bees  in  the  counties  of  California.  The 
colony  figures  are  primarly  from  the  State  Department  of  Agriculture 
registration  list  for  1929. 

TABLE  6 

List  of  California  Counties  with  Fruit  Acreage  and 
Number  of  Bee  Colonies 

Bearing  fruit         Colonies  of 
County  acreage*  hees 

Alameda 7,708  2,944 

Alpine 1  2 

Amador 970  48 

Butte 21,864  8,449 

Calaveras 507  224 

Colusa 3,687  6,322 

Contra  Costa 12,417  3,321 

Del  Norte 4  71 

Eldorado 5,374  662 

Fresno 43,911  16,875 

Glenn 8,497  5,931 

Humboldt 1,665  1,531 

Imperial ..-  4,930  19,639 

Inyo 1,102  3,640 

Kern 8,470  11,142 

Kings 13,191  5,911 

*  These  figures  do  not  include  grapes. 


1932]  Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees  25 


TABLE  6— Continued 

Bearing  fruit  Colonies  of 

County  acreage*  bees 

Lake 7,141  120 

Lassen 185  981 

Los  Angeles 71,567  38,389 

Madera 9,079  2,010 

Marin 633  443 

Mariposa 263  67 

Mendocino 5,295  1,068 

Merced 20,485  8,188 

Modoc 434  1,114 

Mono 74  100 

Monterey 8,823  4,546 

Napa 14,528  1,217 

Nevada 2,349  199 

Orange 49,159  15,742 

Placer 30,910  311 

Plumas 34  47 

Eiverside 39,835  22,585 

Sacramento 24,399  5,864 

San  Benito 15,532  404 

San  Bernardino 74,055  39,830 

San  Diego 12,379  30,279 

San  Francisco 67 

San  Joaquin 21,308  13,573 

San  Luis  Obispo 5,826  3,438 

San  Mateo 1,843  188 

Santa  Barbara 3,197  4,846 

Santa  Clara 102,617  3,275 

Santa  Cruz 18,775  538 

Shasta 2,173  4,510 

Sierra 19  118 

Siskiyou 364  1,256 

Solano 24,062  2,139 

Sonoma 42,994  2,157 

Stanislaus 31,343  8,200 

Sutter 45,329  4,846 

Tehama 8,228  4,728 

Trinity 26  163 

Tulare 76,377  11,446 

Tuolumne 2,071  408 

Ventura 11,900  14,873 

Yolo - 15,078  3,511 

Yuba 9,663  1,031 


*  These  figures  do  not  include  grapes. 


26  California  Agricultural  Extension  Service         [<^R-  62 


PLACING   THE   BEES   IN   THE   ORCHARD 

Bees  are  moved  into  orchards  of  this  state  almost  entirely  by  motor 
truck  or  trailer.  The  actual  move  is  usually  made  during-  the  night. 
The  entrances  of  the  hives  are  as  a  rule  closed,  before  moving,  with 
some  screening  device  or  cloth  material.  During  hot  weather  a 
moving-screen,  in  place  of  the  hive  cover,  is  essential  for  ventilation. 

The  recommendation  of  one  hive  to  the  acre  does  not  mean  that  one 
hive  should  be  located  on  each  acre.  Under  normal  conditions  it  is 
seldom  that  bees  are  left  in  orchards  in  groups  under  ten  colonies. 
The  manipulation  of  single  colonies  is  too  difficult,  particularly  after 
rains ;  also  the  increased  time  and  labor  required  for  removal  of  scat- 
tered colonies  adds  to  the  expense.  Sunshine,  wind,  temperature, 
rain,  and  other  factors  outside  of  the  hive  affect  the  flight  of  bees; 
therefore,  general  recommendations  cannot  be  given  relative  to  the 
proper  placement  of  the  colonies  in  the  orchard.  If  the  weather  is  fair 
and  warm,  during  fruit-blossom  time,  bees  can  undoubtedly  fly  far 
enough  to  cover  100  acres  or  more  of  fruit  from  one  location ;  on  the 
other  hand,  during  a  cold  wet  season  flight  is  very  limited.  The 
absence  of  fruit  or  nuts,  except  within  a  few  rows  distant  from  the  bee 
location,  is  occasionally  reported  following  a  particularly  bad  spring. 

Under  average  conditions  bees  in  groups  of  10  to  20  colonies,  for  as 
many  acres  surrounding  them,  have  been  found  very  satisfactory  both 
to  the  fruit  grower  and  the  beekeeper.  Accessible  situations  along 
roadways  in  the  orchards  should  be  chosen,  because  of  mud  as  well  as 
the  difficulty  of  driving  the  trucks  among  the  trees  at  night. 

The  bee  population  as  is  evident  in  the  table  is  strikingly  low,  in 
comparison  with  the  fruit  acreage,  for  several  of  the  important  fruit 
counties  in  northern  California,  notably  Eldorado,  Napa,  and  Nevada. 
Some  beemen  regularly  move  bees  into  these  fruit  areas  on  a  rental 
basis.  A  factor  partly  responsible  for  this  low  resident  bee  population 
is  the  presence  of  the  detrimental  California  buckeye  tree.  The  lack 
of  a  major  honey  plant  also  greatly  reduces  the  possibility  of  profit- 
able beekeeping.  Undoubtedly  the  intensive  insecticidal  spraying 
operations  practiced  in  many  deciduous  fruit  areas  play  a  part  too  in 
further  reducing  the  number  of  bees. 

To  the  southward,  on  the  other  hand,  the  number  of  colonies  of 
bees  increases  greatly  in  proportion  to  the  fruit  acreage  requiring  pol- 
lination. In  the  upper  end  of  the  San  Joaquin  Valley,  for  example, 
at  the  present  time,  bees  are  rarely  rented  to  the  fruit  grower  for  pol- 


1932]  Pollination  of  Deciduous  Fruits  by  Bees  27 

lination  purposes.  Beemen  are,  in  fact,  very  desirous  of  locating  near 
deciduous  fruit  orchards  to  enable  their  colonies  to  build  up  early  in 
preparation  for  the  orange  honey  flow  during  April.  Tulare  County 
alone  has  some  33,000  acres  of  citrus  fruits. 


COST  OF   RENTING    BEES 

The  rental  price  paid  by  the  fruit  grower  for  bees  in  orchards 
depends  upon  several  factors :  for  example,  necessary  moving  distance, 
condition  of  roads,  local  rainfall,  and  supply  of  bees,  coupled  with 
demand.  In  a  given  area,  like  the  Santa  Clara  Valley,  rental  possi- 
bilities change  with  time:  during  the  World  War,  for  example,  with 
the  accompanying  high  price  of  prunes,  many  bees  were  moved  in 
from  the  vicinity  of  Modesto  at  $5.00  to  $7.00  per  colony  for  the  blos- 
soming period.  Now  but  few  bees  are  taken  in — mostly  for  cherry 
orchards,  at  $2.00  to  $2.50  rental.  The  beekeepers,  in  fact,  find  it  dif- 
ficult to  surmount  the  barriers  set  up  by  the  sentiment  of  pear  growers 
concerning  blight.  The  present  rental  demand  for  bees  in  California 
comes  largely  from  almond  and  plum  growers,  though  the  cherry, 
apple,  and  foothill  pear  growers  also  rent  a  good  many  colonies. 

The  earlier  in  the  fall  a  fruit  grower  can  place  his  order  for  bees, 
the  greater  the  chance  for  satisfactory  accommodation,  because  after 
the  orchard  becomes  muddy,  moving  is  difficult.  Experience  has 
taught  beekeepers  the  unprofitableness  of  renting  colonies  at  current 
prices  when  expensive  moving  problems  arise.  The  average  rental 
price  at  present  is  perhaps  $2.00.  The  fruit  growers  should  insist 
on  good,  strong  colonies,  for  these  are  by  far  the  most  efficient  in 
pollination. 


AGRICULTURAL  EXTENSION  SERVICE   CIRCULARS 


No. 
3. 
5. 


9. 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
14. 

15. 
16. 

17. 

21. 
22. 
23. 
25. 
26. 
29. 

30. 

31. 

32. 
33. 


Feedine:  Beef   Cattle  in  California. 

Lettuce.  (Series  on  California  Crops 
and  Prices.) 

Suggestions  on  Grapefruit  Culture  in 
Imperial  Valley. 

Rabbit  Raising. 

The  Home  Preparation  of  Fruit  Candy. 

Cauliflower  Production. 

"Wool   Production  in  California. 

The  Manufacture  of  Monterey  Cheese. 

Selection  and  Care  of  Electrical  Equip- 
ment Used  in  Dairy  Manufacturing. 

Pork  Production  in  California. 

Irrigation  of  Orchards  by  Contour  Fur- 
rows. 

Liver  Fluke  and  Stomach  Worm  of 
Sheep. 

Bovine  Tuberculosis. 

Thinning  Sugar  Beets. 

Strawberry  Culture  in  California. 

Bush  Fruit  Culture  in  California. 

The  Home  Vegetable  Garden. 

Control  of  Pocket  Gophers  and  Moles  in 
California. 

Elements  of  Grape  Growing  in  Cali- 
fornia. 

Pow^dery  Mildew  of  the  Grape  and  Its 
Control  in  California. 

What  to  do  About  Bovine  Tuberculosis. 

Rearing  Dairy  Heifers  Free  from  Tuber- 
culosis and  Abortion  Disease. 


No. 

34.  Plum  Growing  in  California, 

35.  Alfalfa  Production. 

36.  Beekeeping    for    the    Beginner    in    Cali- 

fornia. 

37.  Home  and  Farm  Preparation  of  Pickles. 
3».   Alfalfa  Varieties  and  Seed  SuRply. 

40.  Frost  Protection  in  California  Orchards. 

41.  Prune  Culture  in  California. 

42.  Peach  Culture  in  California. 

43.  The  California  Avocado  Industry. 

44.  Bang's  Disease    (Infectious  Abortion). 

45.  Zinc  Chloride  Treatment  for  Pear  Blight 

Cankers. 

46.  Clierrv  Culture  in  California. 

47.  Equipment    for    the    Bulk    Handling    of 

Grain. 

48.  The  Manufacture  of  Cottage  Cheese. 

49.  Sheep  Production  in  California. 
51.   Apricot  Growing  in   California. 

53.  Home  Floriculture  in  California. 

54.  The  Control  of  Weeds. 

55.  Growing  and  Handling  Sweet  Potatoes 

in  California. 

56.  Girdling  Grape  Vines. 

57.  Commercial  Fertilizers  and  Soil  Fertility 

in  California. 

58.  Turkey  Raising  in  California. 

59.  The  1932  Agricultural  Outlook  for  Cali- 

fornia. 


STATION  PUBLICATIONS  AVAILABLE  FOE  FREE  DISTKIBUTION 


BULLETINS 


No.  No. 

253.   Irrigation   and   Soil   Conditions  in  the  433. 

Sierra  Nevada  Foothills,  California. 
263.   Size  Grades  for  Ripe  Olives. 

279.   Irrigation  of  Rice  in  California.  435. 

283.  The  Olive  Insects  of  California. 
310.   Plum  Pollination. 

331.   Phylloxera-Resistant  Stocks.  439. 

343.   Cheese  Pests  and  Their  Control. 

348.  Pruning  Young  Olive  Trees. 

349.  A     Study    of     Sidedraft    and    Tractor 

Hitches. 

357.   A     Self-Mixing    Dusting    Machine    for  440. 

Applying  Dry  Insecticides  and  Fun- 
gicides. 

361.   Preliminary  Yield   Tables   for   Second-  445. 

Growth  Redwood. 

364.   Fungicidal    Dusts    for    the    Control    of  446. 

Bunt.  447. 

369.  Comparison  of  Woods  for  Butter  Boxes. 

370.  Factors    Influencing    the    Development  448. 

of  Internal   Browning  of  the  Yellow 
Newtown  Apple.  449. 

3  71.   The    Relative    Cost    of    Yarding    Small 

and  Large  Timber.  450. 

373.  Pear  Pollination. 

374.  A  Survey  of  Orchard  Practices  in  the 

Citrus    Industry    of    Southern    Call-  452. 

fornia.  454. 

379.   Walnut  Culture  in  California. 
386.   Pruning     Bearing     Deciduous     Fruit  455. 

Trees. 
389.   Berseem  or  Egyptian  Clover.  456. 

392.  Fruit  Juice  Concentrates. 

393.  Cron  Sequences  at  Davis.  458. 

394.  I.  Cereal  Hay  Production  in  California. 

II.  Feeding  Trials  with  Cereal  Hays.  459. 

395.  Bark  Diseases  of  Citrus  Trees  in  Cali- 

fornia. 462. 

396.  The  Mat  Bean.  Phaseolus  Aconitifolius.  464. 
404.   The  Dehydration  of  Prunes. 

406.  Stationary  Snray  Plants  in  California.  465. 

407.  Yield.    Stand,    and   Volume   Tables   for  466. 

White    Fir    in    the    California    Pine 

Region.  467. 

408.  Alternaria  Rot  of  Lemons.  468. 

409.  The  Digestibility  of  Certain  Fruit  By- 

products   as   Determined   for   Rumi-  469. 

nants.      Part   I.  Dried  Orange  Pulp  470. 

and  Raisin  Pulp. 

410.  Factors  Influencing  the  Quality  of  Fresh  471. 

Asparagus  After  It  is  Harvested. 

416.  Culture  of  the  Oriental  Persimmon  in  472. 

California.  473. 

417.  Poultry  Feeding:  Principles  and  Prac- 

tice^ 474. 

418.  A   Study  of  Various  Rations  for  Fin- 

ishing Range  Calves  as  Baby  Beeves. 

419.  Economic    Aspects    of    the    Cantaloupe  475. 

Industry.  476. 

420.  Rice   and   Rice   By-Products   as   Feeds  477. 

for  Fattening  Swine. 

421.  Beef  Cattle  Feeding  Trials,  1921-24.  479. 
423.  Apricots    (Series   on    California    Crops 

and  Prices). 

425.  Apple  Growing  in  California.  480. 

426.  Apple  Pollination  Studies  in  California. 

427.  The   Value   of   Orange   Pulp    for   Milk  481. 

Production. 

428.  The  Relation  of  Maturity  of  California  482. 

Plums     to     Shipping     and     Dessert  483. 

Quality.  484. 

431.  Raisin  By-Products  and  Bean  Screen- 

ings as  Feeds  for  Fattening  Lambs.  485. 

432.  Some  Economic  Problems  Involved  in  487. 

the  Pooling  of  Fruit. 


Power  Requirements  of  Electrically 
Driven  Dairy  Manufacturing  Equip- 
ment. 

The  Problem  of  Securing  Closer  Rela- 
tionship between  Agricultural  Devel- 
opment and  Irrigation  Construction. 

The  Digestibility  of  Certain  Fruit  By- 
Products  as  Determined  for  Rumi- 
nants. Part  II,  Dried  Pineapple 
Pulp,  Dried  Lemon  Pulp,  and  Dried 
Olive  Pulp. 

The  Feeding  Value  of  Raisins  and 
Dairy  By-Products  for  Growing  and 
Fattening  Swine. 

Economic  Aspects  of  the  Apple  In- 
dustry. 

The  Asparagus  Industry  in  California. 

A  Method  of  Determining  the  Clean 
Weights  of  Individual  Fleeces  of  Wool. 

Farmers'  Purchase  Agreement  for  Deep 
Well  Pvimps. 

Economic  Aspects  of  the  Watermelon 
Industry. 

Irrigation  Investigations  with  Field 
Crops  at  Davis,  and  at  Delhi,  Cali- 
fornia,   1909-1925. 

Economic  Aspects  of  the  Pear  Industry. 

Rice  Experiments  in  Sacramento  Val- 
ley,  1922-1927. 

Reclamation  of  the  Fresno  Type  of 
Black-Alkali   Soil. 

Yield.  Stand  and  Volume  Tables  for 
Red  Fir  in  California. 

Factors  Influencing  Percentage  Calf 
Crop  in  Range  Herds. 

Economic  Aspects  of  the  Fresh  Plum 
Industry. 

Prune   Supply  and   Price   Situation. 

Drainage  in  the  Sacramento  Valley 
Rice  Fields. 

Curly  Top  Symptoms  of  the  Sugar  Beet. 

The  Continuous  Can  Washer  for  Dairy 
Plants. 

Oat  Varieties  in  California. 

Sterilization  of  Dairy  Utensils  with 
Humidified  Hot  Air. 

The  Solar  Heater. 

Maturity  Standards  for  Harvesting 
Bartlett  Pears  for  Eastern  Shipment. 

The  Use  of  Sulfur  Dioxide  in  Shipping 
Grapes. 

Adobe  Construction. 

Economic  Aspects  of  the  Sheep  In- 
dustry. 

Factors  Affecting  the  Cost  of  Tractor 
Logging  in  the  California  Pine 
Region. 

Walnut  Supply  and  Price  Situation. 

Poultry  Houses  and  Equipment. 

Improved  Methods  of  Harvesting  Grain 
Sorghum. 

I.  Irrigation  Experiments  with  Peaches 
in  California.  II.  Canning  Quality 
of  Irrigated  Peaches. 

The  Use,  Value,  and  Cost  of  Credit  in 
Agriculture. 

Utilization  of  Wild  Oat  Hay  for  Fat- 
tening Yearling  Steers. 

Substitutes  for  Wooden   Breakpins. 

Utilization  of  Surplus  Prunes. 

The  Effects  of  Desiccating  Winds  on 
Citrus  Trees. 

Drying  Cut  Fruits. 

Asparagus  (Series  on  California  Crops 
and  Prices). 


BULLETINS— (Corjfinwerf) 


No. 

488. 

489. 


490. 

491. 

492. 
493. 
494. 
495. 

496. 


497. 

498. 
499. 
500. 
501. 
502. 

503. 

504. 


Cherries  (Series  on  California  Crops 
and  Prices). 

Irrigation  Water  Requirement  Studies 
of  Citrus  and  Avocado  Trees  in  San 
Diego  County,  California,  1926  and 
1927. 

Olive  Thinning^  and  Other  Means  of 
Increasing  Size  of  Olives. 

Yield.  Stand,  and  Volume  Tables  for 
Douglas  Fir  in  California. 

Berry  Thinning  of  Grapes. 

Fruit  Markets  in  Eastern  Asia. 

Infectious  Bronchitis  in   Fow^ls. 

Milk  Cooling  on  California  Dairy 
Farms. 

Precooling  of  Fresh  Fruits  and  Tem- 
peratures of  Refrigerator  Cars  and 
Warehouse  Rooms. 

A  Study  of  the  Shipment  of  Frei^h 
Fruits  and  Vegetables  to  the  Far  East. 

Pickling  Green  Olives. 

Air  Cleaners  for  Motor  Vehicles. 

Dehydration  of  Grapes. 

Marketing  California  Apples. 

Wheat  (Series  on  California  Crops 
and  Prices). 

St.  Johnswort  on  Range  Lands  of 
California. 

Economic  Problems  of  California  Agri- 
culture. (A  Report  to  the  Governor 
of  California.) 


No. 

505.  The    Snowy    Tree    Cricket    and    Other 

Insects  Injurious  to  Raspberries. 

506.  Fruit  Spoilage  Disease  of  Figs. 

507.  Cantaloupe    Powdery    Mildew    in    the 

Imperial  Valley. 

508.  The  Swelling  of  Canned  Prunes. 

509.  The    Biological    Control    of   Mealybugs 

Attacking  Citrus. 

510.  Olives     (Series    on     California     Crops 

and  Prices). 

511.  Diseases  of  Grain  and  Their  Control. 

512.  Barley     (Series    on    California    Crops 

and  Prices). 

513.  An     Economic     Survey     of     the     Los 

Angeles  Milk  Market. 

514.  Dairy  Products    (Series  on   California 

Crops  and  Prices). 
515^  The    European    Brown    Snail    in    Cali- 
fornia. 

516.  Operations   of   the   Poultry    Producers 

of  Southern  California,  Inc. 

517.  Nectar  and  Pollen  Plants  of  California. 

518.  The  Garden  Centipede. 

519.  Pruning    and    Thinning    Experiments 

with  Grapes. 

520.  A  Survey  of  Infectious  Laryngotrache- 

itis  of  Fowls. 

521.  Alfalfa     (Series    on    California    Crops 

and  Prices). 


CIRCULARS 


No. 

115.   Grafting  Vinifera  Vineyards. 

178.  The  Packing  of  Apples  in  California. 

212.   Salvaging  Rain-Damaged  Prunes. 

230.  Testing  Milk.    Cream,    and   Skim   Milk 

for  Butterfat. 
232.   Harvesting    and    Handling    California 

Cherries  for  Eastern   Shipment. 

239.  Harvesting  and  Handling  Apricots  and 

Plums  for  Eastern   Shipment. 

240.  Harvesting    and    Handling    California 

Pears  for  Eastern  Shipment. 

241.  Harvesting    and    Handling    California 

Peaches  for  Eastern  Shipment. 

244.  Central  Wire  Bracing  for  Fruit  Trees. 

245.  Vine  Pruning  Systems. 

248.  Some  Common  Errors  in  Vine  Pruning 

and  Their  Remedies. 

249.  Replacing  Missing  Vines. 
253.   Vineyard  Plans. 

257.  The   Small-Seeded  Horse  Bean    (Vicia 

faba  var.  minor). 

258.  Thinning  Deciduous  Fruits. 

259.  Pear  By-Products. 

261.  Sewing  Grain  Sacks. 

262.  Cabbage  Production  in  California. 
265.   Plant  Disease  and  Pest  Control. 

269.  An  Orchard  Brush  Burner. 

270.  A  Farm  Septic  Tank. 


No. 

279.   The  Preparation  and  Refining  of  Olive 

Oil  in  Southern  Europe. 
282,   Prevention  of  Insect  Attack  on  Stored 

Grain. 
288.   Phylloxera  Resistant  Vineyards. 
290.  The  Tangier  Pea. 
292.   Alkali  Soils. 

294.   Propagation  of  Deciduous  Fruits. 
296,  Control     of     the     California     Ground 

Squirrel. 
301.   Buckeye  Poisoning  of  the  Honey  Bee. 

304.  Drainage  on  the  Farm. 

305.  Liming  the  Soil. 

307.  American  Foulbrood  and  Its  Control. 

308.  Cantaloupe  Production  in  California. 
310.  The    Operation    ef   the    Bacteriological 

Laboratory  for  Dairy  Plants. 

316.  Electrical      Statistics      for      California 

Farms. 

317.  Fertilizer    Problems    and    Analysis    of 

Soils  in  California. 

318.  Termites  and  Termite  Damage. 

319.  Pasteurizing  Milk  for  Calf  Feeding. 

320.  Preservation  of  gruits  and  Vegetables 

by  Freezing  Storage. 

321.  Treatment    of    Lime-induced    Chlorosis 

with  Iron  Salts. 

322.  An  Infectious  Brain  Disease  of  Horses 

and  Mules    (Encephalomyelitis). 


16m-4,'32