Skip to main content

Full text of "Polygenesis in the eggs of the Culicidae ..."

See other formats


With  the  Author’s  Compliments. 


Contributions  to  Knowledge  in  Animal  Evolution.  I. 


polygenesis  in  the  EGGS  OF  THE  CULICIDyE* 1  , 

FROM  THE  RESEARCH  LABORATORY  OF 

SAMUEL  ELLSWORTH  WEBER,  Veterinarian. 

LANCASTER,  PA. 

To  advance  such  a revolutionized  suggestion  as  is  indicated]  by  the 
title  of  this  paper  in  the  face  of  long  established  belief ( may  be 
looked  upon  as  venturesome.  Although  it  may  seem  startling  to  the 
zoologist,  whether  I am  jeopardizing  my  reputation  or  am  justified 
in  making  such  a broad  assertion,  may  best  be 
ascertained  by  going  over  the  work  laid  down  in 
the  forthcoming  papers  on  the  facts  in  relation 
to  an  apparently  unrecognized  law  in  the  process 
of  evolution. 

“ Polygenesis  or  the  production  of  more  than 
one  species  from  the  same  egg-mass  will  doubt- 
less j)Tove  a proposition  difficult  to  bring  to  the 
minds  of  even  the  most  careful  scientists.  Ap- 
preciating that  it  is  contrary  to  ancient  or 
modern  belief  as  to  the  laws  of  nature,  the  state- 
ment is  nevertheless  made,  and  will  be  sup- 
ported by  convincing  facts.  The  several  features 
of  importance  in  connection  with  these  re- 
searches are  not  hasty  conclusions  or  the  result  of  a few  years  of  study 
buiy&ven  extend  beyond  a quarter  of  a century  amid  the  pleasures, 
trials,  and  adversities  in  a difficult  but  guarded  labor. 

“ After  familiarizing  myself  with  the  strange  phenomena  and  un- 
raveling the  question  in  connection  with  it — the  question  of  poly- 
embrvony — in  some  parasitic  hymenopterous  insects  of  the  family 
Chalciclidce  I set  about  looking  for  other  phenomena  which  would 
further  explain  Polygenesis  or  the  production  of  different  species  from 
the  same  egg  which  was  thought  should  be  correlated  with  the  process 
of  budding  from  the  same  egg  as  I found  it  in  Polyembryony.  In  this, 
fortune  has  been  propitious  to  me. 


Fig.  1.  Culex  pipiens 
Linnaeus,  in  the  act  of 
ovadeposition , natural 
size.  Photographed 
from  life  by  S.  E.  Weber. 


Publisher’s  Note. — We  must  naturally  leave  the  full  responsibility  of  this 
alarming  news  to  our  esteemed  co-worker,  and  remain  skeptical  towards  it  until 
the  proof  of  this  announcement  is  placed  before  everyone.  Notwithstanding  this, 
we  did  not  deem  it  advisable  to  withhold  it  from  our  readers. — Natur  und  Haus. 


1 Thi-  notice,  under  the  title,  “ Polygenese  bei  den  Eiern  der  Stechmticken 
(Culicidse) appeared  in  Natur  und  Haus,  Vol.  NV.,  No.  NV.,  May  1,  1907, 
pp.  236- °7.  It  is  principally  extracted  from  an  unpublished  article  on  “Muta- 
tion in  Mosquitoes.” 


9 


& 


The  following  phylogeny  will  help  to  convey  my  meaning: 


Polyembryony.  The  produc- 
tion of  chains  of 
individuals  from  one  egg. 


CHALCIDIDAE. 


Examples. 


POLYGEXESISJ 


Mutation.  The  production  of 
more  than  one  species  or  genera « 
from  the  same  egg  deposition. 


CU  Lie  ID m. 
PS0CID2E. 


“ The  second  phenomenon  in  Poly  genesis  is  a step  which  bestrides 
a colossal  question,  and  in  the  extraordinary  process  is  found  the 
widest  bearing  upon  profound  biological  problems.” 

The  perplexing  manifestations  of  the  phenomena  have  been  noted 
by  some  entomologists  in  the  study  of  mosquitoes  where  observers  have 
found  that  divers  larvae  produced  adults  so  similar  that  they  were 
unable  to  separate  them.  This  work  will  not  only  illuminate  that 
puzzle  in  entomology  but  will  throw  a most  interesting  and  important 
beam  of  light  onto  the  mystery  of  evolution.  The  species  upon  which 
these  observations  have  been  directed  are  of  the  Linnsean  genus  Culex, 
The  cosmopolitan  species  Culex  pipiens , Eig.  1,  is  the  most  common 
mosquito  of  North  America  and  figures  largely  in  these  observations. 
For  the  purpose  of  reviewing  parts  of  the  work  in  the  last  three  years 
a laboratory  adjoining  a natural  breeding  place,  with  a capacity  of 
100,000  egg-masses  of  this  species  alone,  was  conducted  where  the 
necessary  abundance  of  material  was  furnished. 

The  presentation  of  this  subject  should  be  preceded  by  a zoological 
description  of  the  species  in  question,  followed  by  a study  of  the  egg- 
mass,  but  since  such  a treatment  would  exceed  the  limits  of  space 
allowed  by  most  scientific  journals,  a preliminary  paper  now  awaiting 
publication  has  been  written  without  such  a consideration, — entitled 
“ Mutation  in  Mosquitoes.”  Under  this  heading  are  brought  facts 
illustrating  that  two  or  more  species  may  be  produced  from  the  same 
egg-mass.  And  conversely  that  two  or  more  species  of  larvae  may  re- 
vert to  one  and  the  same  species  of  adult  mosquito.  This  same  phe- 
nomenon of  originization  seems  to  dominate  in  the  structure . as  well 
as  in  the  color  mutations. 

“ A zoologist  asked  the  question — ‘ What  was  the  fertilization  of 
the  egg-mass  which  gave  rise  to  different  species  ?’  Upon  my  reply 
that  * I do  not  know/  he  was  ready  to  drop  the  discussion.  The 
burden  of  proof  in  this  work,  will  be,  to  show  the  independence  of  the 
important  question  of  fertilization  regarding  the  mutation  process  in 
insect  life.  To  the  biologist,  who  has  studied  the  varied  vital  powers 
and  susceptibilities  of  the  reproductive  cell,  and  halted  at  the  question 


of  fertilization,  I may  say,  that  these  observations  in  the  phenomena 
of  changes  proceed  by  that  point,  disregarding  it  as  the  most  vital 
factor.  It  is  one  of  many  influences  which  may  be  operative  in  these 
changes.  Fertilization  seems  to  be  a law  of  preservation  rather  than 
that  of  organization  of  species.  Unless  it  can  be  shown  that  the  intra- 
as  well  as  the  extra-procedure  in  these  phenomena  regarding  the  life 
history  of  mosquitoes  are  principally  governed  by  fertilization,  this 
influence,  can  not  be  accepted  as  the  principal  cause.  This  may  only 
be  proved  by  further  study  of  the  law  which  embraces  both  types  of' 
mutation — with,  or  without  integrations  ” 

The  type  of  mutation  referred  to  in  the  phenomena  in  question, 
notably  the  reversion  of  life  stages,  of  different  species  which  had 
issued  from  one  egg-mass  to  the  progenitor  which  deposited  the  eggs, 
and  the  coming  out  from  one  and  the  same  egg-mass  of  different 
species  by  a certain  internal  force  of  nature,  is  not  the  type  which  con- 
stitutes a mutant  in  the  sense  in  which  the  term  is  used  by  de  Vries. 
The  latter  is  based  on  unit  characters  which  will  not  fractidnize  with 
other  characteristics.  Such  discontinuous  variants  or  mutants  may  be 
seen  to  issue  from  egg-masses  while  the  other  method  is  operative. 

a Since  the  combination  of  different  larval  species  and  the  folding 
into  one  adult  species  is  a fact,  the  unfolding  must  be  looked  for  in 
the  stream  which  flows  from  the  internal  state,  which  must  be  through 
the  egg,  for  we  have  no  bud-sports  or  shoots  in  animal  life.  ( I.  e not 
like  in  plants;  of  course  we  have  the  embryonal  budding  in  insects  as 
mentioned  under  polyembryony. ) Our  only  course  is  to  accept  the 
egg-mass  as  the  only  medium  through  which  sports — or  species  assum- 
ing a different  character  from  the  parent — are  suddenly  produced. 
Hence  the  polygenetic  power  of  the  egg-mass  in  mosquitoes 

These  phenomena  are  a new  domain  of  investigation  in  the  origin  of 
species  and  may  demand  to  be  designated  under  other  terms.  They 
disclose  what  takes  place  in  nature,  and  render  the  process  of  evolu- 
tion amenable  to  direct  observation. 

Briefly. — Divers  mosquito  larvce  producing  similar  adults  must 
spring  from  similar  adults. 

The  egg-mass  of  the  Culicidce  is  but  a part  in  the  life  cycle  of  the 
individual  of  a species  endowed  icith  the  same  inherent  principles  as 
the  other  stages , more  particularly  by  the  larval  portion , and  as  such 
may  be  considered  as  A POLYGENETIC  F ACTOR.” 

Lancaster,  Pa., 

December  1,  1906. 


This  article  is  reprinted  in  the  original  by  the  author  for  the  reason  that 
articles  on  the  subject  have  been  refused  publication  by  the  editors  of  six 
American  scientific  journals,  who  should  be  willing  to  give  a man  a hearing 
after  having  worked  out  a simple  truth,  even  if  it  is  contrary  to  general  belief 
or  their  own  views. 

When  I consider  my  own  skepticism  as  to  the  laws  in  mutation,  how  often 
it  was  necessary  for  me  to  see  it  occur  under  my  eye,  before  being  convinced 
that  it  was  an  actual  fact,  I can  feel  more  charitable  toward  anyone  for  dis- 
believing, and  resting  in  the  sentiment  expressed  by  one  of  the  editors  who  did 
not  accept  an  article  on  the  subject  because — “ its  readers  might  be  expected  to 
remark  as  did  Binthem  I believe — ‘ I am  very  glad,  my  dear  sir,  that  you  saw 
that,  for  if  I had  seen  it  myself,  I would  not  have  believed  it.’  ” 

After  years  of  personal  labor  on  such  an  important  question,  it  seems  unjust 
to  be  deprived  of  even  a hearing  in  one’s  own  country. 

As  a matter  of  met  the  lamented  Cope  in  1893  asked  for  an  article  on  the 
subject  for  the  American  Naturalist,  and  the  recent  words  from  Professor  E.  G. 
Conklin — “ get  in  print  and  let  us  study  your  work  ” — express  the  sentiments 
of  others  with  whom  the  work  has  been  discussed. 

Dr.  R.  W.  Shufeldt  says,  “ I,  too,  am  skeptical  as  to  your  views,  but  at 
the  same  tune  I believe  in  always  giving  a man  a fair  hearing.”  I am  much 
indebted  10  Dr.  Shufeldt  for  calling  my  attention  to  the  avenue  through  which 
the  announcement  of  this  work  at  least  gained  record. 

While  American  readers  have  been  deprived  of  these  articles  through  the 
English  language,  they  are  referred  to  the  German  publication,  and  the  forth- 
coming Archives  Irom  this  Laboratory. 

The  words  from  Professor  Hugo  de  Vries,  “ I am  very  glad  that  you  are 
convinced  of  my  interest  in  Mutation  in  insect  life,”  swings  the  pendulum  laden 
with  unction  to  my  breast  far  beyond  the  power  of  expression. 

1 am  trusting  that  this  fair  flower  of  truth,  hampered  thus  far,  may  through 
the  great  innate  power  of  itself,  soon  bloom  with  its  pure  leaves  of  charity,  sin- 
cerity and  peace,  and  may  all  the  skepticism  be  vanquished  by  the  noble  influ- 
ence of  its  fragrance  which  time  alone  can  expand. 

If  Sir  William  Ramsay’s  reported  marvelous  discovery  (a  few  days  ago) 
of  a method  of  transmuting  a higher  into  a baser  metal — copper  into  lithium — 
is  a fact,  then  he  has  evidently  been  working  with  the  law  of  organization  in 
mutation  which  I am  familiar  with  in  animal  life.  I am  anxiously  awaiting  his 
own  report  upon  his  experiments.  The  law  which  reduces  a higher  metal  into  a 
lower  must  work  both  ways;  and  therefore  that  end  of  the  principle  in  chemical 
discovery  may  sooner  or  later  be  accomplished.  It  may  certainly  be  reasonable 
to  state  that  the  law  of  changes  which  I have  discovered  in  animal  life  is  com- 
mon to  the  three  kingdoms. 

Lancaster,  Pa., 

July  29,  1907. 

The  author  of  this  paper  was  born  in  Hegins,  Pa.,  July  20,  1861,  received 
an  academic  education  at  Sumneytown,  Pa.,  and  graduated  from  the  Ontario 
Veterinary  College  in  1884.  Member  of  the  American  Veterinary  Medical  Asso- 
ciation, the  Pennsylvania  State  Veterinary  Medical  Association,  etc. 


Subscriptions  towards  the  publication  and  distribution  of  the  Archives 
from  this  Laboratory  may  be  sent  to  Mr.  John  C.  Carter,  Cashier  of  Fulton 
National  Bank  of  Lancaster,  Pa.,  who  will  receipt  for  them  to  subscribers.