Skip to main content

Full text of "Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 4th series"

See other formats


36s AW ALAS, 
eR WHER 
Poe Th) 
ay 


Hs te haths RAArba nh VisMA be Pah em men Toe ev Mi tele 
uh te ahs 


Lusty 
De ay, 


a 


Afi 


tae 
r 


ote PFE 
WPL Mises nye sy 


Pi An Bos ra 
> SS MN DOM T 


aera 
Pe Fans SH ee on ae cmas 
ate eee 


ety 
SON Dt, 2: 


IS ate haint 
NE NAME Ma Bas ee 
een 
MeSH eRe in act, 
MR KE 


ieitene, 
eae ne ee 


Fe tv tyne Orn 
NEI at mays Tien, 


ots 5 oe | 


Vol SRA 


. = 
a 
| | 
ay 
. < 
e 
| RAN PR ANE DEC Ay 
Ue eh 
5 ea pare 
" ) a ‘ 
Ww 


\ igiey uc 


a 


ae uy My 
¥ , A ie 1 ' ah 
vn y Mey , te 


i mt Ay 
i hy Ke i‘ 
i M | i i ' 

| j My ci ; ny 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


California Academy of Sciences 


FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX 


SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLISHED BY THE ACADEMY 
1972-1974 


COMMJTTEE ON PUBLICATION 
GrorcE E. Lrnpsay, Chairman 


Diana R. Youne, Editor 


No. 


No. 


No. 


No. 


No. 


No. 


alle 


lz. 


CONTENTS OF VOLUME XXXIX 


HERTLEIN, LEo G. Description of a new species of 
Chlamys (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) from the Galapagos 
Nietegrmd pee 908 So 0 5 th a a ie Pe Oh Bn 


SmitH, ALLYN G. Three new land snails from Isla Santa 
Cruz (Indefatigable Island), Galapagos -_______________ 


HERTLEIN, Leo G. Pliocene fossils from Baltra (South 
Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands ——_______ 


ABE, TOKIHARU, and WILLIAM N. ESCHMEYER. A new 
species of the scorpionfish genus Helicolenus from the north 
apiCHOccahee tt AONE Pe ood ee Neat oe eee 


ESCHMEYER, WILLIAM N., and K. V. Rama Rao. Two new 
scorpionfishes (genus Scorpaenodes) from the Indo-west 
Pacific, with comments on Scorpaenodes muciparus 
(Phe encica) eee iets, Bee 2 AR BE 


ZULLO, Victor A., DEA B. BEACH, and JAMEs T. CARLTON. 
New barnacle records (Cirripedia, Thoracica) —...__ 


CAsTEEL, RicHarp W. A key; based on scales, to the 
families of native California freshwater fishes 


AsHLOCK, PETER D. The Lygaeidae of the Galapagos 
islands< (Hemiptera; «Eleteroptera). 2d 


Brown, WALTER C., and Marjorie V. C. FALANRUW. A 
new lizard of the genus Emoia (Scincidae) from the 
ianataiicse USGS 9 aoe Mes ee a 


McCoskeEr, JOHN E. Two new genera and two new species 
of western Pacific snake-eels (Apodes: Ophichthidae) 


HERALD, Ear S., and JoHN E. RANDALL. Five new Indo- 
Ge SIC EISINC Sie eres en eee 


CHEMSAK, JOHN A., and E. G. Linstey. The genus Mecas 
ieConte (Colecptera:Cerambycidae) 2. == 


Pages 


47-53 


55-64 


65-74 


75-86 


87-103 


105-110 


111-120 


121-140 


141-184 


No. 13. 


No. 15. 


No. 19. 


Now ZL. 


No. 23 


SMITH-VANIZ, WILLIAM F., and Jon C. STAIGER. Compar- 
ative revision of Scomberoides, Oligoplites, Parona, and 
Hypacanthus with comments on the phylogenetic position 
of Campogramma (Pisces: Carangidae) 


ComPAGNoO, L. J. V. Ctenacis and Gollum, two new genera 
of sharks (Selachu? Carcharimidat) ">" eae 


MAnpRA, York T., A. L. BRIGGER, and H1GHooHT MANDRA. 
Chemical extraction techniques to free fossil silicoflagellates 
from marine’ sedimentary rocks ==" =" ee 


ESCHMEYER, WILLIAM N., YosuHitsuGu Hrrosakti, and 
TOKIHARU ABE. Two new species of the scorpionfish genus 
Rhinopias, with comments on related genera and species —___ 


GarTH, JOHN S. The brachyuran crabs of Easter Island _ 


ESCHMEYER, WILLIAM N., and Kaza V. Rama Rao. Two 
new stonefishes (Pisces: Scorpaenidae) from the Indo-west 
Pacific, with a synopsis of the subfamily Synanceiinae _____ 


Compacno, L. J. V. Gogolia filewoodi, a new genus and 
species of shark from New Guinea (Carcharhiniformes: 
Triakidae), with a redefinition of the family Triakidae and 
a key*to Triakid ‘genera’ 4° eee 


Howarp, L. D. Muscular anatomy of the forelimb of the 
sea otter (Enhydra lutris) i... Oe ee 


BURGHARDT, GLENN FE. A _ new Hawaiian  chiton 
Rhyssoplax linsleyi (Mollusca: Amphineura: Chitonidae) — 


Iwamoto,Tomio. Nezumia (Kuronezumia) bubonis, a new 
subgenus and species of grenadier (Macrouridae: Pisces) 
from Hawaii and the western North Atlantic — 


SCHRADER, HANS-JOACHIM. Revised diatom stratigraphy 
of the Experimental Mohole Drilling, Guadalupe Site 


Index to: Volume: XOX XIX$ 2) es eee 


185-256 


257-272 


273-284 


285-310 


311-336 


337-382 


383-410 


411-500 


501-506 


507-516 


517-562 
563-580 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


FOURTH SERIES 
Vol. XXXIX, No. 1, pp. 1-6; 5 figs. January 21, 1972 


DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF CHLAMYS 
(MOLLUSCA: PELECYPODA) FROM THE 
GALAPAGOS ISLANDS 


By 
Leo G. Hertlein 


INTRODUCTION 


The known marine molluscan fauna of the Galapagos Islands in general 
is sparser than that of the mainland. Eleven species of scallops (Pectinidae) have 
been reported living in the Galapagos Archipelago. These are: Pecten (Flabelli- 
pecten) sericeus Hinds, Pecten (Oppenheimopecten) galapagensis Grau, Chlamys 
(Chlamys) lowei Hertlein, Chlamys (Argopecten) circularis Sowerby, Chlamys 
(Nodipecten) magnifica Sowerby, Cyclopecten (Cyclopecten) exquisitus Grau, 
Cyclopecten (Cyclopecten) pernomus Hertlein, Cyclopecten (Delectopecten) 
polyleptus Dall, Cyclopecten (Delectopecten) zacae Hertlein, and from very 
deep water, Cyclopecten (Cyclopecten) liriope Dall and Cyclopecten (Hyalopec- 
ten) neoceanicus Dall. Seven of these are known to occur along the adjacent 
mainland. 

In 1969, Mr. Anthony D’Attilio, San Diego Society of Natural History, sent 
six paired valves (four with the animal) and four single valves representing a 
species of Chlamys to Allyn G. Smith, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, 
California Academy of Sciences, with a request for identification of the species. 
These subsequently were submitted to me for study. A search of the Academy’s 
collection as well as of the literature failed to reveal any similar species described 
from the eastern Pacific. Upon receipt of this information Mr. D’Attilio re- 
quested me to describe the species which appears in the present paper. 


[1] 


Si a eae 
me JAN 3 1 1972 


RMdie oo ale lala eee 


a ET Ges 
rine Bicsiogical L vor tary 


Ce 


2 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRroc. 4TH SER. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


The writer here expresses his thanks to the following persons: to Mr. 
Anthony D’Attilio, San Diego Society of Natural History, for permission to 
describe the new species and to retain paratypes; to Mr. Allyn G. Smith, Cali- 
fornia Academy of Sciences, for advice concerning the specimens; to Mr. Barry 
Roth of the same institution for critical reading of the manuscript and for 
arrangement of the illustrations; to Dr. Thomas R. Waller, Division of Inverte- 
brate Paleontology, United States National Museum, for information concerning 
comparative species in the collections of the National Museum; to Mr. Maurice 
Giles, Staff Photographer, California Academy of Sciences, who prepared the 
photographs from which the illustrations were made. 


DESCRIPTION OF NEW SPECIES 


Family PECTINIDAE Rafinesque 
Genus Chlamys Roding in Bolten 


Chlamys (Chlamys) incantata Hertlein, new species. 
(Figures 1-5.) 

Dracnosis. A species of Chlamys differing from other west American species 
in possessing very narrow, compressed, rather low, spinose ribs. 

DeEscriIPTION. Shell averaging about 45 mm. in height, ovate, valves gently 
and nearly equally inflated, hinge line rather short. Right valve sculptured with 
about 25 major ribs which are narrow, compressed, rather low, and occasionally 
unequally spaced; on top of each of these ribs is a row of spines which are con- 
cave ventrally; submargins with 5 or 6 very fine riblets; interspaces vary in 
width but are much wider than the ribs, nearly flat-bottomed, and sculptured 
with 1 to 3 fine radial threads, each bearing a row of spines, the ribs and inter- 
spaces crossed by fine concentric imbricating lines of growth; auricles unequal, 
the anterior one the larger, sculptured with about 5 spiny radial riblets, the 
hinge line above the auricle with scaly sculpture, below the auricle a well 
developed byssal notch about half the length of the auricle, below this along the 
margin there are 4 pectinidial teeth; posterior ear short, slightly concave, sloping 
rather steeply downward, sculptured with about 6 radial riblets. Left valve 
sculptured similar to the right but lacking a byssal notch. Hinge with one pair 
of slight cardinal crura. Interior of valves lightly grooved corresponding to the 
external ribbing. Color of the exterior of the valves whitish, the spines rosy, 
lending a roseate appearance to the valves, more pronounced on the left one. 

Dimensions. Length 40 mm., height 45 mm., length of hinge line 21 mm., 
convexity (both valves together) approximately 13 mm. The largest specimen, 
a left valve, is 48 mm. high. 

TYPE MATERIAL. Holotype no. 52263, also paratypes, San Diego Society of 
Natural History, from off Academy Bay, Santa Cruz (Indefatigable) Island, 


VoL, XXXIX] HERTLEIN: A NEW SPECIES OF CHLAMYS 3 


Ficure 1. Chlamys (Chlamys) incantata Hertlein, new species. Holotype no. 52263 
(San Diego Society of Natural History), from off Academy Bay, Santa Cruz (Indefatigable) 
Island, Galapagos Islands, dredged in 200 meters. View of the exterior of the left valve; 
height 45 mm. Ficure 2. Chlamys (Chlamys) incantata Hertlein, new species. View of the 
exterior of the right valve of the holotype. Ficure 3. Chlamys (Chlamys) incantata Hert- 
lein, new species. Paratype (SDSNH), from the same locality as the holotype. View 
of the exterior of a left valve; height 48 mm. Ficure 4. Chlamys (Chlamys) incantata 
Hertlein, new species. Paratype (SDSNH), from the same locality as the holotype. 
View of the exterior of a right valve; height 39.5 mm. Ficure 5. Chlamys (Chlamys) 
incantata Hertlein, new species. View of the interior of the right valve shown in figure 2. 


Galapagos Islands; dredged in 200 meters; Mrs. Jacqueline DeRoy collector, 
July 25, 1969. 
Paratypes are deposited in the California Academy of Sciences, the Amer- 
ican Museum of Natural History, and in the United States National Museum. 
CoMMENTS. The shape, spinose sculpture, and rosy coloration of this new 


4 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


species are somewhat similar to those of Chlamys hastata Sowerby (see Arnold, 
1906, pl. 42, figs. 1, la, 2, 2a; Grau, 1959, plates 27, 28) from California, but 
the ribs are more numerous, lower, more compressed, and not arranged in pairs 
on the right valve. 

The fewer ribs (25) on the new species serve to separate it from Chlamys 
amandi Hertlein (1935, p. 305; Pecten australis Philippi, 1845, p. 56 “Patriae: 
Insulae Chonos.”; not Pecten australis Sowerby, 1842) from Chile, which has 30 
to 34 ribs which are only slightly scaly toward the submargins. 

The sculpture of C. incantata, new species, bears a general resemblance to 
that of the species described as Pecten (Chlamys) coccymelus by Dall (1898, p. 
741, pl. 34, fig. 1) from strata of middle Miocene age at Plum Point Maryland. 
Dall called attention to the similarity of the fossil form to juvenile Pecten 
madisonius Say, but believed it to be a distinct species. Mansfield (1936, p. 177) 
stated that it “may be an immature specimen representing a varietal form of 
P. madisonius,’ and Rowland (1936, p. 1008) suggested that it ‘““may be a case 
of arrested development.” 

The sculpture of the new species described here bears a general similarity 
to that of illustrations of Pecten (Chlamys) nympha Bavay (1906, p. 246, pl. 
7, figs. 3 and 4). The type specimen of that species was described as only about 
15 mm. high. The type locality was given as “Habitat Caribaeum Mare?”. The 
type specimen in the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris, was 
originally in a carton which also contained a specimen of Pecten antillarum 
Récluz, a typical inhabitant of Caribbean waters. Dr. Thomas R. Waller 
(written communication, December 30, 1969), who has given considerable time 
to a study of the Pectinidae of the western Atlantic, stated that he feels certain 
that Pecten (Chlamys) nympha is a synonym of Chlamys benedicti Verrill and 
Bush (in Verrill, 1897, p. 74; not Pecten benedicti Lamarck, 1819) described 
from “off Martha’s Vineyard, 1356 fath., dead; West Indies, in 25 to 72 fath., 
living.” Adult specimens of C. benedicti (Weisbord, 1964, pl. 14, figs. 8-11) 
are quite distinct from the new species described here from the Galapagos Islands. 

The specific name of this new species, “cantata,” is derived from the 
vernacular appellation, “Las Islas Encantadas” (the Enchanted Islands), some- 
times applied to the Galapagos Islands. 


LITERATURE CITED 


ARNOLD, R. 
1906. The Tertiary and Quaternary Pectens of California. United States Geological 
Survey, Professional Paper no. 47, pp. 1-264, pls. 1-53, 2 figs. in text. 
Bavay, A. 
1906. Sur quelques especes ou variétés nouvelles du genre Pecten. Journal de Conchyli- 
ologie, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 243-247, pl. 7, February 20. 
Dati, W. H. 
1898. Contributions to the Tertiary Fauna of Florida with especial reference to the 
Silex beds of Tampa and the Pliocene beds of the Caloosahatchie River including 


Vor. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: A NEW SPECIES OF CHLAMYS 5 


in many cases a complete revision of the generic groups treated and of their 

American Tertiary species. Transactions of the Wagner Free Institute of Sci- 

ence of Philadelphia, vol. 3, pt. IV, pp. I-VIII, 571-947, pls. 23-35, April. 
Grau, G. 

1959. Pectinidae of the eastern Pacific. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions, vol. 23, pp. 
I-VII, 1-308, pl. 1-57, September 25. 

HERTLEIN, L. G. 

1935. The Templeton Crocker Expedition of the California Academy of Sciences, 1932. 
No. 25. The Recent Pectinidae. Proceedings of the California Academy of 
Sciences, Fourth series, vol. 21, no. 25, pp. 301-328, pls. 18-19, September 26. 

MANSFIELD, W. C. 

1936. Stratigraphic significance of Miocene, Pliocene, and Pleistocene Pectinidae in the 
southeastern United States. Journal of Paleontology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 168- 
192, 1 text fig., pls. 22-23, April. 

Rowranp, H. I. 

1936. The Atlantic and Gulf Coast Tertiary Pectinidae of the United States. II. Sys- 
tematic Descriptions, continued. American Midland Naturalist, vol. 17, no. 6, 
pp. 985-1017, pls. 5-10, November. 

VerRRILL, A. E. 

1897. A study of the Family Pectinidae, with a revision of the Genera and Subgenera. 
Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Sciences, vol. 10, pt. 1, pp. 41-95, 
pls. 16-21, June. 

WEIsBorD, N. E. 

1964. Late Cenozoic Pelecypods from Northern Venezuela. Bulletins of American 

Paleontology, vol. 40, no. 204, pp. 1-564, pls. 1-59, February 18. 


Pig ne ae 


Shy WY aa ae a aaeay ait) ei 
b 2 > &? wah 


is : 7] nao wy 7 (ar? a 


Tif se. — > Far liieei® ralicrw - 


- 7 
b fh aut ® a 2175.9) or 
: 3/= y a oi == 
' 2 ? - q ' Rhee 
é a! 
wf 
ee 


ys 


° 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Volume XXXIX, No. 2, pp. 7-24; 25 figs. January 21, 1972 


THREE NEW LAND SNAILS FROM ISLA SANTA 
CRUZ (INDEFATIGABLE ISLAND), GALAPAGOS 


ey 
Allyn G. Smith 


Associate Curator, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, California Academy of Sciences 


From late January to early March, 1964, I had the opportunity to collect land 
snails on one of the larger of the Galapagos Islands as a participant in the Gala- 
pagos International Scientific Project (GISP). This expedition was sponsored 
by the University of California, the California Academy of Sciences through the 
Belvedere Scientific Fund, and the Charles Darwin Foundation. Assistance, both 
financial and material, was provided by the government of the Republic of 
Ecuador, the United States Navy, the National Science Foundation of the United 
States*, the Shell Oil Company, and the California Maritime Commission whose 
training vessel, the Golden Bear, provided transportation of personnel and equip- 
ment to and from the Galapagos. 

The major portion of the five weeks in the Galapagos Islands was spent in 
collecting on Isla Santa Cruz (Indefatigable). The decision to concentrate on 
this island was made for several reasons. First, it is large, high, and well forested, 
containing all of the life zones occurring in the Galapagos group; second, the 
Darwin Research Laboratory close to the village of Academy Bay made an 
ideal headquarters; and third, the well developed trail from Academy Bay into 
the highland area, which was pioneered by the members of the California Acad- 
emy’s 1932 Expedition sponsored by Templeton Crocker, cut through all life 
zones and made good collecting spots accessible (see map, fig. 1). These reasons 
fortunately tied in with the fact that the late winter and spring of 1964 proved 
to be a good time to find land snails on Isla Santa Cruz. There was considerable 


* Through NSF Grant no. GE-2370 


[7] 


Marine Biological Lebaratory 
LIBRA?CYy 
JAN 3 1 1972 

Weods Hole, Mass. 


8 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


DAPHNE MINOR © (Be ISLA SEYMOUR 


SKETCH MAP BY: NORTH CHANNELN 
David Q. Cavagnaro 
ned DAPHNE MAJOR @ 
Sigvart Horneman 
March, 1965 
Based on U.S. Hydrographic Chart 
Nos. 5921 and 5939. 


Punto del Norte 


Punta Corrion 


BAHIA CONWAY 


A & ISLA SANTA CRUZ (INDEFATIGABLE) ° 
ROCAS 
PS GORDON 
SS istas 
Seoles|e Covagnaro Crater Qc es 
CENTRAL HIGHLAND CHAIN ae 


+ 

No 

\ } Deep Crater 
W237 i 
ixe™, “* al - #2 - eae Crocker 


* Scalesia 
x Chimney.” 34 ** 4p Table Mountain 
Sonta)Rosci@). grassland Minow gee bonds ote DCroter 
: miconia grassland fi Camote 
NAMELESS ee {Le Copa 
© ISLAND aE PS ores: \miconla .~“ 
mora imoras. oo “ 
i “FARM ZONE =< @ Kastdalen Farmhouse 
ponds H “ss... Castro °,@Horneman Farmhouse 


El Chato Farmhouse Sow Bello Vista 


“\.@ El Rancho Puerto Nunez 


Transition c Transition 
Bahia Tortuga | Old Trail 
z New Trall “2*<.5 Coastal 


°s. Barranco 
ne Sei smograph 
= Coastal Way oT 20g ote 
4.3 mm. = 1 km. Punta re 
lem. =23.14 km. Tomayo 


APPROXIMATE SCALE 

~ Punta Nunez 

Darwin Research Station 

= © Jensen Island 
unto 


Ploya Estrada 
de los 


Perros 


"~ BAHIA ACADEMY 
Bahia Tortuga 


1 


Ficure 1. Outline map of Isla Santa Cruz (Indefatigable Island), Galapagos Islands, 
with some of the principal features sketched in. 


rainfall, even in the Arid Zone along the shores of the island, which promoted 
snail activity. 

The collections made through personal efforts were considerably augmented 
by other GISP scientists during their field work on other islands as well as Santa 
Cruz. To these appreciation is due. In addition, special thanks go to André 
and Jacqueline De Roy, a Belgian couple living at Academy Bay, for much 
pertinent information on possible productive collecting areas. Although not an 
active conchologist like his wife, M. De Roy became interested in the species of 
land snails to be found on his island and has made a number of special trips into 
uncollected areas in the highlands of Isla Santa Cruz in the past several years 
with signal success. 

The following new species discovered as a result of these efforts make a 
significant addition to the land snail fauna of the Galapagos. The symbols 
“CASG” and “CASIZ” represent separate collections maintained by the Califor- 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH: NEW GALAPAGOS LAND SNAILS 9 


nia Academy of Sciences’ Geology and Invertebrate Zoology departments, respec- 
tively, the latter consisting mainly of specimens preserved in alcohol. 


Naesiotus deroyi A. G. Smith, new species. 
(Figures 2-9.) 


DescripTION. Shell fairly large for the genus, elongate-conic, yellowish 
white at the apex graduating to pure white on the body whorl. Whorls about 7, 
gently rounded, the sutures well impressed. Aperture subquadrate, with 2 promi- 
nent denticles, the first a strong, rounded boss on the columella, and the second a 
less strong, somewhat laterally compressed, subtriangular, parietal denticle posi- 
tioned a short distance behind the plane of the aperture. Peristome thickened 
slightly but not reflected except on the basal portion, which partly covers a small 
shallow umbilicus. The peritreme is completed by a fairly heavy wash of callus. 
The columellar axis is simple, solid, and only slightly twisted. (See fig. 4.) 

Nuclear whorls 2’, erect, sculptured by many fine, closely spaced, occa- 
sionally anastomosing, slightly sinuate and protractive transverse lirae. The 
first postnuclear whorl is relatively smooth and marked by hardly noticeable 
lines of growth. Beginning with the second postnuclear whorl, a rough irregular 
but generally transverse wrinkling appears, becoming very heavy, somewhat 
warty, and more or less patternless on the penultimate and especially on the 
body whorl. Underlying this strong wrinkled sculpture are fine, closely spaced, 
spiral lirae, also beginning on the second postnuclear whorl, but not overriding 
the raised areas forming the wrinkles. 

The animals, in alcohol, are yellowish white in color with no apparent special 
markings on the mantles. Unfortunately, I did not see specimens alive. 

Hototype. An adult shell (CASG Type Collection, no. 13730) with animal 
in alcohol (CASIZ Type Series, no. 466), the shell measuring: height, 19.8; 
maximum diameter, 12.0; height of aperture, 8.8; maximum width of aperture, 
7.6 mm. Number of whorls, 6%. The apical angle of the spire is about 50°. 
(Seedies: 2,3.) 

PaRATYPES. Seventy-two specimens collected with the holotype. These have 
been deposited in various museums having recognized type collections, including 
the CASIZ Type Series, and in several private collections. 

Type Locality. Isla Santa Cruz (Indefatigable Island), Galapagos, on the 
northwest side at an elevation of about 264 m. (870 ft.), on a species of thorny 
bush (locally called “mora,” the botanical name not available) by André De 
Roy, 18 February 1964. 


OTHER MATERIAL EXAMINED (ALL FROM ISLA SANTA CRUZ). 


(1) Three adult specimens (CASG no. 40129) found in a locality “1-2 hours 
walk west of the Horneman Farm,’’—at an elevation of about 200 m. (650 ft.). 


10 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


4 2 


Ficure 2. Naesiotus deroyi A. G. Smith, new species. Holotype. Height, 19.8 mm. Aper- 
tural view. CASG Type Collection, no. 13730. Ficure 3. Same. Back view. FIGURE 4. 
Same. Shell with cut-away section to show configuration of columella. Paratype. Height, 
18.1 mm. CASG Type Collection, no. 13731. Ficure 5. Naesiotus cf. N. deroyi. Adult 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH: NEW GALAPAGOS LAND SNAILS 11 


These were the first ones found by André and Jacqueline De Roy in 1963 in 
the same general area as the type lot collected in 1964. Others are in the De Roy 
Collection. 

(2) Six adult shells, typical (CASG no. 40076), collected on the trail 6 miles 
to the west of the village of Bella Vista, on bushes, by André De Roy, 10 June 
1964. 

(3) One typical but rather small subadult (CASG no. 40302), collected in an 
area to the north of the central chain of craters well north and slightly west of 
the village of Santa Rosa, on the ground in a dense forest of Scalesia pedunculata, 
by André De Roy, 26 November 1966. 

(4) One juvenile (CASG no. 40122), collected 5 miles northwest of Bella 
Vista, on “mora,” at about 265 m. (870 ft.) elevation by André De Roy, 18 
February 1964. 

(5) Three rather small adults (CASG no. 40225), collected on the north side 
of the hill nearest to Santa Rosa Spring, on grass in a grassy glade, 200 m. (650 
ft.) elevation, by André De Roy, 29 June 1965. 

(6) Fourteen adults and subadults (CASG no. 40022), found 2 km. north- 
east of the village of Santa Rosa, on the ground, by André and Jacqueline De 
Roy, 28 June 1965. This series is not typical. 

(7) Seven specimens (mostly subadults) preserved in alcohol (CASIZ Coll.), 
taken about 2 km. northeast of Santa Rosa, in open Scalesia forest hanging on 
the leaves of various plants and bushes, by André De Roy, 27 November 1966. 
This and the preceding lot are similar. 


Remarks. This is one of the largest and most strikingly sculptured of the 
Galapagos species of Naesiotus. No species closely similar has been described. 
While an average specimen is about 20 mm. high, with 7 whorls or slightly less, 
an unusually large one may be as much as 23 mm. in height, with the whorls 
numbering 7% to 72. It appears to be a terminal species in the group of 
Galapagos snails that have developed a heavily wrinkled sculpture on nearly all 
of the postnuclear whorls rather than on the last portion of the body whorl, which 


< 


shell from lot no. 6 with weaker wrinkled sculpture. Hypotype. Height, 17.4 mm. CASG 
Type Collection, no. 13733. Apertural view. FIGURE 6. Same. Back view. FIGURE 7. 
Naesiotus deroyi. Adult shell from lot no. 5. Hypotype. Height, 17.5 mm. CASG Type 
Collection, no. 13734. Apertural view. Ficure 8. Same. Back view. FicurE 9. Galapagos 
Naesiotus related to N. deroyi. Left to right: N. rabzdensis (Dall, 1917) from Isla Rabida 
(Jervis Island), hypotype, height, 13.5 mm. (CASG Type Collection, no. 13735); N. 
sculpturatus (Pfeiffer, 1846) from Isla Santiago (James Island), hypotype, height, 13.6 
mm. (CASG Type Collection, no. 13736); N. darwini (Pfeiffer, 1846) from the same 
island, hypotype, height, 15.9 mm. (CASG Type Collection, no. 13737) ; N. deroyi, holotype, 
fig. 2. 


12 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


is the type of sculpture on such species as Naesiotus lycodus (Dall, 1917), N. 
ochsneri (Dall, 1917), and several others. So far, NV. deroyi has been collected 
in the highland area of Isla Santa Cruz, only toward the northwest side of the 
island; it seems to prefer the moister forested area characterizing the Scalesia 
Zone. The nearest relative is Naesiotus darwini (Pfeiffer, 1846) from James 
Island, which is smaller, chunkier, and has a finer and much less rude type of 
wrinkled sculpture. Other species in the group include \. sculpturatus (Pfeiffer, 
1846) from James Island, and NV. rabidensis (Dall, 1917) from Jervis. (See fig. 
9.) 

Snails from lots 6 and 7 listed under “other material examined” come from 
the same general locality as the others. However, they are smaller in size than 
those from the type locality, averaging 17.1 mm. in height, with a range of 15.7— 
17.6 mm. Color is a light yellow-brown and all shells have a narrow, darker 
brown band encircling the periphery of the whorls; many have the entire base 
tinged with the same brown color. The wrinkled sculpture is much less strong, 
some shells having smooth patches with no wrinkles at all. (See figs. 5, 6.) As 
in some other Galapagos snail species, this particular population evidently 
represents an evolutionary trend of recent origin. Whether a subspecies is in 
the process of development is difficult to say until the range limits of both forms 
can be determined and other related factors studied. At present, it seems suffi- 
cient to call attention to the occurrence of another race closely allied to V. deroyi. 

It is with considerable satisfaction that I take this opportunity to name a 
striking new species of Galapagos land snail for M. André De Roy, who collected 
the first specimens as well as the type and other lots. 


Naesiotus cavagnaroi A. G. Smith, new species. 
(Figures 10-18.) 

DescripTION. Shell fairly large for the genus, smooth, broadly elongate- 
conic, with a fairly heavy texture and a tumid body whorl. Normal color pattern 
is reddish brown to chocolate brown with a narrow yellowish band coloring the 
sutures of the postnuclear whorls and encircling the body whorl slightly below 
its periphery. Whorls about 6’, rounded, the sutures impressed. Aperture ovate, 
white inside, with 2 well developed denticles, the first an elongate, rounded 
swelling on the columella, the second one smaller, arcuate, and parietal, set well 
inside the retractive plane of the aperture and forming a U-shaped bay with the 
columellar denticle. Peritreme rather sharp, thinned down toward its edge, not 
reflected, the outside edge yellowish in color. The peritreme is completed by a 
heavy layer of callus, especially in older shells. There is a small shallow umbil- 
icus partly covered by the basal reflection of the peristome. The columella is 
simple and only slightly twisted. 

Nuclear whorls about two, dimpled, appearing smooth to the naked eye but 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH: NEW GALAPAGOS LAND SNAILS 13 


under magnification revealing a sculpture of extremely fine, closely spaced, 
transverse lirations that are slightly sinuate and beaded at their summits as a 
result of being cut by excessively fine spiral striae. Postnuclear whorls sculptured 
by lines of growth and very fine, closely spaced, spiral striations, the latter best 
seen under considerable magnification. 

The surface of most shells exhibits a rather dull finish overall, with a tendency 
in some toward a more shining exterior. Occasional shells are yellowish in color 
with no suggestion of a revolving band. Animals in alcohol are tuberculate dor- 
sally and light grey in color, there being no appreciable color difference between 
those occupying normally colored or xanthic shells. 

Hototype. An adult shell preserved without the animal has been deposited 
in the CASG Type Collection, no. 13738. It measures: height, 22.7; maximum 
diameter, 13.9; height of aperture, 10.4; maximum width of aperture, 9.1 mm. 
Number of whorls, 6%. Apical angle, about 70°. (See figs. 10, 11.) 

ParaTyPeEs. A total of 52 specimens collected with the holotype. Of this 
total 30 have adult shells, 17 are subadults, and 6 are juveniles. Of this same 
total, 10 have xanthic shells (6 adults, 3 subadults, and 1 juvenile). About half 
of the type lot were collected alive; animals with their shells of a few of both 
color forms have been preserved in alcohol. A distribution of these paratypes 
will be made in a manner similar to that indicated for the previously described 
species (Naesiotus deroyt). 

Type Locatity. Isla Santa Cruz (Indefatigable Island), Galapagos, about 
7 km. northeast of the farming village of Santa Rosa in the vicinity of a series 
of small volcanic craters in a Scalesia forest; collected under lava rocks and 
dead wood by André De Roy, 27 November 1966. 


OTHER MATERIAL EXAMINED. 


(1) Three dead, bleached, adult shells (CASG no. 40158) collected along the 
trail near the summit of Mt. Crocker at an elevation of 650-870 m. (2130- 
2850 ft.) by Robert L. Pyle, 25 February 1964. 

(2) Seven dead, bleached, adult shells (CASG no. 40237) collected near an 
isolated rocky crater (subsequently designated as Cavagnaro Crater), in a 
Scalesia forest on the north slope of the island at an elevation of about 500 m. 
(1600 ft.) by David Q. Cavagnaro, 10 April 1964. 

(3) One dead, bleached adult shell (CASG no. 40512) found about 0.5 mile 
below Santa Rosa on the trail from Bella Vista by André and Jacqueline De Roy, 
1 March 1965. 

(4) One dead but fresh adult shell, 1 subadult and 1 juvenile (CASG no. 
40229) collected in the Scalesia forest near Cavagnaro Crater, elevation about 
625 m. (2050 ft.), by André and Jacqueline De Roy, 2 March 1965. 

(5) Sixty-two dead adult shells (CASG no. 40221) collected on the ground 


14 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc, 4TH SER. 


12 15 18 


Ficure 10. Naesiotus cavagnaroi A. G. Smith, new species. Holotype. Height, 22.7 mm. 
CASG Type Collection, no. 13738. Apertural view. Ficurre 11. Same. Back view. FIGURE 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH: NEW GALAPAGOS LAND SNAILS 15 


in the vicinity of Cavagnaro Crater, elevation about 690 m. (2200 ft.), by André 
and Jacqueline De Roy, 2 March 1965. 

(6) One dead, bleached, adult shell (CASG no. 40228) collected on the 
ground near Santa Rosa school by André De Roy, 2 November 1965. 

(7) One dead, bleached, adult shell (CASG no. 40234) collected 2 miles 
from the Santa Rosa school on the trail from Bella Vista, by André De Roy, 2 
November 1965. 

(8) Seven dead, bleached, adult shells (CASG no. 40295) collected in the 
vicinity of Cavagnaro Crater, by André De Roy, 23 November 1966. 

(9) Three bleached “bones” (CASG no. 40300) collected in a small lava 
cave to the west of Chimney Mountain, by André De Roy, 25 November 1966. 

(10) Thirty-eight adult shells, all xanthic (CASG no. 27537), collected “at 
the very top of the island” (7.e., summit of Mt. Crocker) by Templeton Crocker, 
10 or 11 May 1932. 

(11) Forty-seven adult shells, all xanthic but darker in color than the pre- 
ceding lot (CASG no. 27538), collected “‘on the trip to top of Mt.,” by Templeton 
Crocker, 10 or 11 May 1932. 

(12) Two adults and 1 juvenile with color pattern reversed taken alive half 
way between Chimney Mountain and Santa Rosa Spring under low bushes in 
an open area, elevation about 600 m. (1950 ft.), by André and Tui De Roy, 
27 June 1965. 

(13) Thirty-three mostly adult shells taken alive (CASG no. 43333; 15 in 
alcohol are CASIZ Collection) 2 miles west of Mt. Crocker at the foot of a volcanic 
crater on the ground among small trees, by André and Jacqueline De Roy, 10 
May 1970. 


Remarks. This smooth brown snail with a yellowish revolving band has no 
close relatives of comparable size either on Isla Santa Cruz (Indefatigable 
Island) or on any of the other Galapagos Islands. Its range on Indefatigable is 
limited to the north slope of the island extending down from the summit of the 


<_ 


12. Same. Shell with cut-away section to show configuration of columella. Paratype. 
Height, 22.0 mm. CASG Type Collection, no. 13739. Ficure 13. Same. Xanthic color- 
phase, adult, from type lot. Paratype. Height, 21.2 mm. CASG Type Collection, no. 13740. 
Ficure 14, Same. Xanthic shell, adult, with over-all greenish-brown color tone, from lot 
no. 11. Hypotype. Height, 23.1 mm. CASG Type Collection, no. 13741. Apertural view. 
Ficure 15. Same. Back view. Ficure 16. Same. Adult shell with color pattern reversed, 
from lot no. 12. Hypotype. Height, 18.8 mm. CASG Type Collection, no. 13742. Ficure 17. 
Same, Adult shell with normal color pattern reversed, from lot no. 13. Hypotype. Height, 
26.7 mm. CASG Type Collection, no. 13743. Ficure 18. Naestotus duncanus (Dall, 1893). 
Adult dead shell from Isla Pinzén (Duncan Island). Hypotype. Height, 18.7 mm, CASG 
Type Collection, no. 13744. 


16 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRroc. 4TH SER. 


main volcanic crater, Mt. Crocker, generally in the Scalesia Zone, at elevations 
above 500 m. (1600 ft.). It is a ground snail, frequenting moist habitats under 
lava rocks, Scalesia dead-falls, or equivalent cover. 

Naesiotus cavagnaroi is remarkably consistent in size and general configura- 
tion. Measurements of 15 adult shells from the type locality average 21.9 mm. 
in length and 13.4 mm. in maximum diameter, with about 6’ whorls. The cor- 
responding range measurements for this series are 21.0—23.5 and 12.4—14.6, with 
the number of whorls ranging from 5*4 to 6%, the latter number being the most 
frequent. Young shells are prominently keeled at the base of the developing 
whorls. 

The occurrence of xanthic shells along with normally colored ones is of 
particular interest. (See figs. 13-15.) No similar situation has been observed 
in any other Galapagos species of Naesiotus. According to André De Roy, who 
collected the type series, the ratio of xanthic to normally colored shells is about 
one to five, which is confirmed by the count of specimens sent by him for identifi- 
cation and study. There is no difference in the color of the animals and all 
xanthic shells seen fall within the range of measurements given above. Lot nos. 
10 and 11 in the preceding list are all the bandless xanthic color form. They 
were collected by Templeton Crocker during the Academy’s 1932 Galapagos 
Expedition at the time he and his party pioneered the first ascent of the island’s 
main crater, later called Mt. Crocker in his honor. The series of shells he col- 
lected at the crater rim are of the same yellowish color as xanthic shells from 
the type locality of the species. The second lot, collected at a lower elevation on 
the way to the top, are darker in color with a greenish brown cast. Both of these 
lots evidently represent pure xanthic populations of the species; the exact 
localities where they were found are presently unknown and a search for them 
should be made. . 

The three specimens in lot no. 12 in the list of specimens examined have a 
color pattern that is the reverse of the normal one, being a light beige-brown 
overall with a dark brown encircling band. The two adult shells have red-brown 
nuclear whorls but in size and sculpture they are normal for the species. (See 
fig. 16.) Until recently this reverse color pattern was thought to be of rare 
occurrence, but an apparently pure colony of such shells was collected by the De 
Roys in the highland area in May 1970 (lot no. 13, preceding). Of the 33 shells 
sent in for study, 21 have the same reverse color pattern just mentioned except 
that the encircling brown band is bordered below by a whitish band of somewhat 
variable width (see fig. 17); 7 have weak or indistinct banding and thus ap- 
proach the xanthic form; and 5 are similar to the xanthic shells occurring in the 
type lot. Compared with the type series, shells in this lot average slightly higher, 
several being a little longer spired with deeper sutures. The largest shell mea- 
sures 26.7 X 14.5 mm. in height and maximum diameter. Mme. De Roy’s com- 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH: NEW GALAPAGOS LAND SNAILS 17 


ments on this lot (personal communication, 1 August 1970) are of such interest 
that they are repeated, as follows: 


Surprisingly, we found them living in an area where André had collected before, only 
that he searched a couple of hundred yards on either side. In fact, the area where 
this colony of snails is living is restricted (?) to a brushy patch surrounded by grass- 
covered hills and may be no more than 3 or 4 acres. Snails there are quite abundant 
but this could change before long, as barbed-wire fence already divides the place in 
two lots and the land will be converted into pastures. 


Although the reverse color phase may possibly turn out to be a different species 
when the relation between it and the color phase considered to be the normal one 
is better known, present indications are that there is only a single species in- 
volved, in spite of the fact that there are four color forms. 

Two described Galapagos species have some superficial resemblance to 
Naesiotus cavagnaroi. One is N. duncanus (Dall, 1893) from Duncan Island 
(Isla Pinzon), shown in figure 18, which has the same general shape and number 
of whorls although it is considerably smaller in size, has a less well developed 
parietal denticle, and lacks the columellar thickening or flange present on J. 
cavagnaroi. Unfortunately, NV. duncanus has not been reported as having been 
collected alive and may, in fact, be extinct. The other similar species is the rare 
N. jervisensis (Dall, 1917), which again is much smaller than NV. cavagnaroi, 
has a less well developed parietal denticle and columellar flange, but has the 
same type of fine spiral sculpture: it differs, however, in having the last whorl 
irregularly corrugated and in being unicolored and unbanded. 

The species is named for David Q. Cavagnaro, California Academy ento- 
mologist and a member of the GISP, who collected some of the first specimens 
and also a number of other land snails of considerable scientific value on Isla 
Santa Cruz and on several other Galapagos islands he was able to visit. 


Naesiotus scalesiana A. G. Smith, new species. 
(Figures 19-25.) 

DESCRIPTION. Shell of medium size for the genus, elongate to globose-conic, 
the apex rose-colored with the remaining shell whitish or tinged with beige, 
yellowish white, or very light red-brown. Whorls 5% to 6%, almost flat-sided, 
the sutures only moderately impressed. Aperture subovate, usually without 
denticles; the peristome thin and unflared, hardly reflected at the base of the 
columella, leaving open a small but permeable umbilicus, not joined across the 
parietal wall of the body whorl with any appreciably thickened wash of callus. 

Nuclear whorls nearly 3, erect, sculptured with extremely fine, closely spaced, 
nearly straight transverse riblets or lirae, extending all the way across them. 
Postnuclear whorls somewhat shining, the first one or two with coarse, irregular 
lines of growth, later ones with additional, irregulary placed, rather deep indenta- 


18 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


24 


Ficure 19. Naesiotus scalesiana A. G. Smith, new species. Holotype. Height, 14.1 mm. 
CASG Type Collection, no. 13745. Apertural view. Ficure 20. Same. Back view. FIGURE 
21. Same. Shell with cut-away section to show configuration of columella. Paratype. Height, 
13.6 mm. CASG Type Collection, no. 13746. Ficure 22. Same. Enlarged view of portion 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH: NEW GALAPAGOS LAND SNAILS 19 


tions and elongate impressions, which are most prominent on the body whorl. 

Animals in alcohol generally yellowish white, occasionally tinged with light 
gray on the dorsal surface, the foot usually being of a slightly lighter color tone. 
Rarely, an animal is quite dark-colored. There appears to be no correlation 
between the color of the animal and the color of the shell. 

Hototype. An adult shell measuring: height, 14.1; maximum diameter, 
7.5; height of aperture, 6.4; width of aperture, 3.7 mm. Number of whorls, 6%. 
Apical angle, about 45°. CASG Type Collection, no. 13745. 

PaRATYPES. Ninety-two additional specimens preserved dry, deposited in 
various museums maintaining type collections including the CASG Type Collec- 
tion, and 4 preserved in alcohol in the CASIZ Type Series, no. 470. 

Type LocaLity. Isla Santa Cruz (Indefatigable Island), Galapagos Islands, 
in the Scalesia Zone, Horneman Farm area, at an elevation of about 244 m. (800 
ft.), on Scalesia trees and tall bushes, collected by A. G. Smith, 19 February 
1964. 

RANGE AND ECOLOGY. A total of 36 separate lots, in addition to the type lot, 
have been collected and are available for study. All of these have contributed 
to the present consideration of the species. They represent over 500 specimens, 
mostly preserved dry, although a representative series of animals were drowned 
and preserved in alcohol in an expanded condition. 

Naestotus scalesiana seems to be the most prevalent species throughout the 
Scalesia Zone on Isla Cruz. Its occurrence most often on the trunks and branches 
of Scalesia trees makes the name given to it an appropriate one. This habitat is 
shared with NV. lycodus (Dall, 1917), also pink-tipped but with a much more 
wrinkled shell, which is almost as common at the type locality although it does 
not climb as high up as NV. scalesiana. The latter species has been collected also, 
though sparingly, at the upper edge of the Transition Zone and in the lower part 
of the Miconia Zone but it does not seem to thrive outside the areas occupied 
by the forests of Scalesia pedunculata wherever they occur under conditions of 
heavier rainfall and hence of moister conditions than exist in the lower or the 
higher, somewhat dryer life zones. 

Along the “old” or original trail from Academy Bay village to the highland 


< 


of holotype to show sculptural detail. Ficure 23. Same. Group of five adult shells from 
Scalesia Zone below Bella Vista village, Isla Santa Cruz. Allyn G. Smith and Ira L. Wiggins, 
collectors, 19 February 1964. Hypotypes. Height (left-hand shell), 13.3 mm. CASG Type 
Collection, nos. 13747, 13747a, 13747b, 13747c, 13747d. From CASIZ Color Slide, no. 955. 
Ficure 24. Same. Group of five adult shells from type lot. Holotype at left (height, 14.1 
mm.) ; the rest paratypes, CASG Type Collection, nos. 13748, 13748a, 13748b, 13748c. From 
CASIZ Color Slide no. 1937. 


20 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRroc. 4TH SER. 


area on Isla Santa Cruz, Dr. Ira L. Wiggins and I first encountered NV. scalesiana 
in 1964 in the Transition Zone at an elevation of about 120 m. (400 ft.) (CASG 
no. 40083, 2 adult specimens). It became quite common at the lower end of the 
Scalesia Zone on young Scalesia trees, along with N. lycodus, and continued 
prevalent in the vicinity of the village of Bella Vista, the areas of the Horneman 
and Kastdalen Farms, and for a short distance into the Miconia Zone (CASG 
no. 40070, 3 adult specimens). Elsewhere in the Scalesia Zone M. André De 
Roy and others collected it toward the eastern side of the island in the Table 
Mountain area (CASG no. 40232), on the northern side in the general vicinity 
of Cavagnaro Crater (CASG no. 40221), around the village of Santa Rosa, and 
to the south of Santa Rosa near the end of the trail into the Tortoise Reserve 
at El Chato. 

The Scalesia snail lives in more of an arboreal habitat than any other Gala- 
pagos land snail with which I am familiar. On one collecting trip, Dr. Wiggins 
and I decided to sacrifice one large Scalesia branch to see just how far up the 
snail might go. We found two living adults (CASG no. 40231) at the very tip 
of the branch, about 35 feet from the ground, among the small sunflower-like 
Scalesia blossoms in flower at the time. It does not confine itself entirely to 
Scalesia plants and trees, however, but has been collected living on Darwin- 
iothamnus, a bush of medium height, and below Santa Rosa village in thickets 
of thorny shrubs called “mora” by the native Ecuadoreans in company with 
another new species of Galapagos land snail, Naesiotus deroyi, described earlier 
in this report. 

Unfortunately, nothing is known at present of the breeding habits of the 
species; its egg clusters were not found in 1964 and have not been reported 
subsequently. 

INDIVIDUAL VARIATION. The type lot of VV. scalesiana was selected for general 
consistency in size and color of the shells, and also for the accessibility of the 
type locality at the Horneman Farm, making it relatively easy for topotypical 
material to be collected. Color in the type lot ranges from almost pure white 
to an overall suffusion of beige or light brown; only one adult shell in the series 
has darker postnuclear whorls, with a body whorl having a distinctly brown 
and white banded pattern. (See fig. 24.) The rose-colored tip is consistent 
within the type lot and for most of the other shells at hand. 

Variation in size within the type lot is shown in the following table of mea- 
surements of 25 adult paratypes, selected more or less at random: 


Item Height (mm.) Max. Diam. (mm.) Apical Angle (°) No. Whorls 
Tallest shell i522 7.6 49 614 
Shortest shell 115 6.2 51 5% 


Avg. of 25 1333) Til 50 5%, 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH: NEW GALAPAGOS LAND SNAILS 21 


Ficure 25. Naesiotus scalesiana. Shell with living animal. Collected by Robert L. Usinger 
and Earl G. Linsley, Bella Vista village, 4 February 1964. Author’s field photo taken at 
Academy Bay. From CASIZ Color Slide, no. 440. 


Shells from other localities on the island have measurements that are consistent 
with the preceding figures. A few adult shells from the vicinity of Santa Rosa 
have slightly more tumid whorls and lack the usual rose-colored apex. 

Most shells have simple apertures with no parietal or columellar denticles 
or denticular swellings; this is true of all specimens in the type lot and of others 
collected in the Horneman Farm area. A few shells from the general vicinity 
of Santa Rosa do have small to subobsolete parietal denticles, and in some but 
not all of these there are perceptible swellings on the columella where a columellar 
tooth would normally occur, were one present. Such denticular processes are 
not a character of this species although they are normal in the apertures of other 
species of Naesiotus from Isla Santa Cruz and other Galapagos Islands. Whether 
the rare occurrence of apertural denticulation represents an evolutionary trend 
toward development of prominent teeth in the aperture, or away from this, is 
a question that cannot be answered from the present sparse knowledge of the 
biology of the species and its probable ancestral relationships. 

A well rounded body whorl is characteristic of NV. scalesiana, although occa- 


22 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH Ser. 


sionally an adult shell shows a barely perceptible angulation at its base near 
the periphery. As might be expected, this feature is seen more often on juvenile 
and subadult shells. 

The indented sculpture on the body whorl is peculiar; it cannot be said to 
be malleate in terms of small, rounded hammer marks. Rather, it consists of 
pits in combination with elongated, sometimes anastomosing furrows that have 
the appearance of impressions made by a blunt point or an elongated, blunt edge. 
This type of sculpture varies somewhat in intensity between populations from 
which specimens have been collected. (See figs. 22, 25.) On the whole, however, 
the shells of NV. scalesiana exhibit characters that are quite consistent throughout 
its range. 

CoMMENTS. It seems unusual that such an abundantly represented species 
of Galapagos land snail has escaped notice for so long a time. W. H. Dall did 
not recognize it as having been collected during earlier Galapagos expeditions; 
apparently neither Baur nor Wolf saw it. Reibisch (1892) reported nothing like 
it, his only large snail from Indefatigable Island (Isla Santa Cruz) being 
Naesiotus wolfi, an entirely different species which he described as new. It was 
not found by Snodgrass and Heller during the Hopkins-Stanford Expedition of 
1897—98; nor was it collected by W. H. Ochsner during the California Academy’s 
1905-06 Expedition, which spent quite a little time at Academy Bay. The 
California Academy’s 1932 Expedition did not find it even though in the first 
ascent to the rim of the main crater the party led by Templeton Crocker traversed 
the Scalesia Zone on the way to the top as well as on the way back. The United 
States National Museum has no specimens like it in its large representative col- 
lection of Galapagos land snails; however, it does possess a single adult specimen 
from an unidentified island, collected or obtained by Hugh Cuming, under the 
name Bulimulus calvus (Sowerby, 1833) (USNM no. 104,864) that is quite 
close to Naesiotus scalesiana. The first authentic collecting record known to 
me is a single shell found by Dr. Robert I. Bowman, “5 miles North of Academy 
Bay,” March 2, 1953, at an elevation of 775 feet (CASG no. 34649). All shells 
collected subsequently were taken during the Galapagos International Scientific 
Project of 1964 and since. 

Naesiotus scalesiana has no demonstrable relationship with any of the other 
15 species of Naestotus from Isla Santa Cruz, including the two previously 
described as new in this report. I have not seen shells like it from any of the 
other islands in the Galapagos Archipelago. Closest relatives would appear to 
be certain species of Naesiotus from the mainland of South America (Weyrauch, 
1956, 1967) but lack of appropriate mainland material at the present writing 
places any detailed comparison beyond the scope of this discussion. 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH: NEW GALAPAGOS LAND SNAILS 23 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


Appreciation and thanks to André and Jacqueline De Roy of Academy Bay, 
Isla Santa Cruz, and to several scientists of the Galapagos International Scientific 
Project of 1964 have already been expressed. In addition, David Q. Cavagnaro, 
California Academy entomologist with the GISP, also should have special men- 
tion for his land-snail collecting efforts on top of a full-time entomological pro- 
gram. 

I am greatly indebted to the California Academy’s scientific photographer, 
Mr. Maurice Giles, for his excellent work in providing acceptable snail illustra- 
tions from actual specimens, and for his black-and-white reproductions of three 
of the author’s 35 mm. color transparencies. 


LITERATURE CITED 


DALL, WILLIAM HEALEY 
1893. Preliminary notice of new species of land-snails from the Galapagos Islands, 
collected by Dr. G. Baur. Nautilus, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 52-56. May. 
1896. Insular landshell faunas, especially as illustrated by the data obtained by Dr. 
G. Baur in the Galapagos Islands. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural 
Sciences of Philadelphia, 1896, pp. 395-459, pls. 15-17. 
1900. Additions to the insular land-shell faunas of the Pacific Coast, especially of the 
Galapagos and Cocos islands. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences 
of Philadelphia, 1900, pp. 88-105, pl. 8. 
1917. Preliminary descriptions of new species of Pulmonata of the Galapagos Islands. 
Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, ser. 4, vol. 2, pt. 1, no. 
11, pp. 375-382. San Francisco. December 31. 
1920. On the relations of the sectional groups of Bulimulus of the subgenus Naesiotus 
Albers. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 
117-122. Washington, D. C. March 4. 
DALL, WILLIAM HEALEY, AND WASHINGTON HENRY OCHSNER 
1928. Landshells of the Galapagos Islands. Proceedings of the California Academy of 
Sciences, ser. 4, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 141-185, pls. 8-9. San Francisco. June 22. 
Pirspry, Henry AUGUSTUS 
1897-98. American Bulimulidae: Bulimulus, Neopetraeus, Oxychona, and South Amer- 
ican Drymaeus. Manual of Conchology, ser. 2, Pulmonata, vol. 11, pp. 1-339, 
pls. 1-51. Philadelphia. 
REIBISCH, PAUL 
1892. Die concholiologische Fauna der Galapagos Inseln. Sitzungsberichte und 
Abhandlungen Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft Isis in Dresden, 1892 
(January—June), pp. 13-32, 1 text fig. (map), pls. 1-2. Dresden. 
STEARNS, ROBERT EDWARDS CARTER 
1893. Report on the mollusk fauna of the Galapagos Islands with descriptions of new 
species. Scientific Results of Explorations by the U. S. Fish Commission 
Steamer Albatross, no. 30. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 
vol. 15, no. 942, pp. 353-450, pls. 50-52. Washington, D. C. August. 
WEYRAUCH, WOLFGANG 
1956. The genus Naesiotus, with descriptions of new species and notes on other Peruvian 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc, 4TH SER. 


24 


Bulimulidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 


vol. 108, pp. 1-17, pl. 1. June 22. 

1967a. Treinta y ocho nuevos gastropodos terrestres de Peru. Acta Zoologica Lilloana, 
tomo 21, pp. 343-455, pls. 1-9. Tucuman, Argentina. 

1967b. Descripciones y notas sobre gastropodos terrestres de Venezuela, Columbia, 
Ecuador, Brasil y Peru. Acta Zoologica Lilloana, tomo 21, pp. 457-499, pls. 


1-4. Tucuman, Argentina. 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Volume XXXIX, No. 3, pp. 25-46; 39 figs. April 6, 1972 


PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA (SOUTH 
SEYMOUR) ISLAND, GALAPAGOS ISLANDS 


By 
Leo G. Hertlein 


California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118 


INTRODUCTION 
The present paper deals chiefly with invertebrate fossils which I collected 
while a member of the first Expedition of the Velero I// to the Galapagos Islands 
in 1931-1932. A general account of the itinerary of this expedition appeared in 
a report by Fraser (1943, pp. 50, 260, 262, 272-273). A report dealing with 
fossils of Pleistocene age collected on this expedition was published by Hertlein 
and Strong (1939) and in a later paper the same authors (1955) reported on the 
Recent shells. Fossils believed to be of Pliocene age, chiefly mollusks, were 
collected during January, 1932. The pressure of other duties delayed completion 
of the present paper. 
In addition to the collection which I assembled, Joseph R. Slevin collected 
a few fossils of Pliocene age in 1927 when he visited the island on Captain G. 
Allan Hancock’s Oaxaca. A few other specimens received through the courtesy 
of Dr. A. Myra Keen of Stanford University, are included in the present paper. 
The author is grateful for having had the opportunity to accompany the 
expedition offered by the late G. Allan Hancock, owner of the Velero J/I. The 
author acknowledges aid received from two other individuals, now deceased: 
A. M. Strong, who identified the micro-gastropods and E. H. Quayle who con- 
tributed information concerning the corals. Mr. Barry Roth, Department of 
Geology, California Academy of Sciences, furnished information concerning 
the identification of the species in the family Marginellidae, contributed helpful 
comments concerning certain other species, and also aided in 1 the preparation 
Marine Biological Labor..tory 


LIBRAFRY 


[25] 


APR 14 1972 
Woods Hole, Viass. : 


26 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


the plates. The identifications of the corals listed in this paper were furnished 
by Dr. J. W. Durham, Department of Paleontology, University of California, 
Berkeley. The author is grateful to Carmen Angermeyer and to Jacqueline 
De Roy, residents of Academy Bay, Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos Islands, who 
presented many specimens of Recent shells from those islands to the California 
Academy of Sciences. These specimens have been very useful for comparison 
with fossil forms from that archipelago. 

Photographs used to illustrate the fossils were prepared by Mr. Maurice 
Giles, Photographer, California Academy of Sciences. Margaret M. Hanna 
kindly retouched some of the photographs. The manuscript was typed by Enid 
Cook. 

One new subspecies, Diplodonta subquadrata baltrana, is described in the 
present paper. 


GENERAL REMARKS 


Darwin visited the Galapagos Islands during the voyage of the Beagle in 
1835. He mentioned (1844, p. 115; see ed. 3, 1896, p. 130) sea shells belonging 
to modern genera, apparently on Chatham Island, ‘embedded several hundred 
feet above the sea, in the tuff of two craters, distant from each other.” Later 
Wolf (1895, pp. 250, 254, 265) reported the occurrence of fossil shells in the 
islands in palagonite tuff at a height of 100 meters above sea level. 

W. H. Ochsner, during an expedition of the California Academy of Sciences 
to the Galapagos Islands on the schooner Academy, spent most of one year in 
the islands and discovered fossils on Isabela (Albemarle), Santa Cruz (Inde- 
fatigable), and Baltra (South Seymour) islands. On this expedition Ochsner 
collected the fossils of Pliocene age on Baltra (South Seymour) Island mentioned 
by Dall (1924) and later reported upon by Dall and Ochsner (1927, see espe- 
cially pp. 94-99). They listed 28 species (and four others identified only as to 
genus) from beds believed to be of Pliocene age, 24 species from the “upper zone” 
and 4 in the “lower zone”. Chesterman (1963, p. 344) reported on rocks of 
the Galapagos Islands and mentioned fossiliferous limestone and “fossiliferous 
tuffaceous sandstone” on Baltra (South Seymour), collected by Ochsner. He 
also described a specimen of andesite from the south end of the island. 

Baltra Island is composed chiefly of lava and other pyroclastic material with 
very minor amounts of intercalated limestone and fossiliferous tuffaceous beds. 

This island experienced faulting in comparatively recent time, the lines of 
fracture trending approximately east-northeast. This faulting resulted in alter- 
nating raised and depressed blocks. A depressed block separates Baltra (South 
Seymour) from Santa Cruz (Indefatigable) Island and a similar depressed block 
separates Baltra from Seymour (North Seymour) Island. Lewis (1956, p 290) 
remarked on the relatively recent faulting as did Williams (1966, pp. 55-70) 


Vot. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA ISLAND 27 


who discussed the general geology of the Galapagos Islands. More recently, 
McBirney and Williams (1969, pp. 17-20, fig. 7) discussed the geology and 
petrology of Baltra, as well as that of other islands in the archipelago. 

The fossil-bearing bed on the south end of the bay on the west side of the 
island is about 3 meters (10 feet) thick and dips about 5° or 6° south. Large 
angular blocks of lava in the lower portion of the bed offer evidence of deposition 
very near the shore. 

The majority of the species in the present list were taken from the tuffaceous 
ashy bed. A number of small specimens were obtained by passing some of the 
white ashy material through a sieve. 


COLLECTING STATIONS 


Locality 1305 (CAS), cliff on southwest side of Baltra (South Seymour) 
Island, Galapagos Islands. Joseph R. Slevin collector, December 16, 1927. 
Pliocene. 

Locality 27249 (CAS), white and yellowish tuffaceous strata interbedded 
with lava on the south side of the bay on the west side of Baltra (South Seymour) 
Island, Galapagos Islands. Leo G. Hertlein collector, January 16-18, 1932. 
Pliocene. 

Locality 27251 (CAS), strata about 1.5 meters (5 feet) thick on the northern 
side of the bay, about the middle of the west side of the island, near the top of 
the plateau, Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Leo G. Hertlein 
collector, January 14-15, 1932. Pliocene. 

Locality 31838 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. 
Fossils received by Dr. A. Myra Keen who presented them to the California 
Academy of Sciences, March 22, 1943. 


LIST OF FOSSILS FROM BALTRA (SOUTH SEYMOUR) ISLAND* 


An asterisk * indicates that the species is extinct. 


COELENTERATA 


Pavona gigantea Verrill 
Psammocora (Stephanaria), species indeterminate 


ECHINOIDEA 
Encope micropora galapagana H. L. Clark, locs. 13051; 27249 (CAS) 
Eucidaris thouarsii Valenciennes, loc. 1305 (CAS) 


PELECYPODA 
Anatina (Raéta) undulata Gould, loc. 31838 (CAS) 
* Anodontia spherica Dall and Ochsner, locs. 1305; 27251 (CAS) 
Anomia peruviana d’Orbigny, loc. 27249 (CAS) 


1 Reported from this locality as Encope micropora L. Agassiz by Grant and Hertlein (Publ. Univ. Calif. 
Los Angeles Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 2, p. 98, 1938). 


28 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Arca pacifica Sowerby, loc. 1305 (CAS) 
Arca (Arcopsis) solida Broderip and Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Atrina cf. A. tuberculosa Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Barbatia reeveana d’Orbigny, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Cardium elenense Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Chama species, loc. 1305 (CAS) 
Chione undatella Sowerby, loc. 27249; (cf.) 31838 (CAS) 
Chione species, loc. 1305 (CAS) 
Chlamys (Argopecten) circularis Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Chlamys (Nodipecten) magnifica Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Ctena galapagana Dall, locs. 1305; 27249 (CAS) 
Cuminga ctf. C. lamellosa Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Diplodonta subquadrata baltrana Hertlein, new subspecies, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Florimetis cognata Pilsbry and Vanatta, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Glycymeris maculata Broderip, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Megapitaria cf. M. aurantiaca Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Megapitaria squalida Sowerby, loc. 31838 (CAS) 
Modiolus capax Conrad, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Nioche cf. N. zorritensis Olsson, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Ostrea megodon Hanley, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Ostrea palmula Carpenter, loc. 1305 (CAS) 
Ostrea species, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

* Pecten (Pecten) slevini Dall and Ochsner, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Protothaca (Tropithaca) grata Say, locs. 27249; 31838 (CAS) 

* Protothaca (Tropithaca) cf. P. (T.) seymourensis Dall and Ochsner, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Tagelus cf. T. dombeii Lamarck, loc. 27251 (CAS) (cast) 
Tagelus species, locs. 27249; 31838 (CAS) 


GASTROPODA 


Acanthina grandis Gray, loc. 1305 (CAS) 

Acteocina infrequens C. B. Adams, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Alaba supralirata Carpenter, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Alvania cf. A. galapagensis Bartsch, loc. 27249(CAS) 
Alvania ct. A. halia Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Alvania cf. A. hoodensis Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Alvania cf. A. nemo Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Amphithalmus trosti Strong and Hertlein, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Anachis cf. A. tabogaensis Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Balcis cf. B. berryi Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Bulla punctulata A. Adams in Sowerby, locs. 27249; 31838 (CAS) 
Cancellaria cf. C. ovata Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Cantharus janellii Kiener, locs. 1305; 27249 (CAS) 

* Cantharus cf. C. scissus Olsson, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Cerithiopsis curtata Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Cerithiopsis cf. C. galapagensis Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Cerithium adustum Kiener, locs. 1305; 27249 (CAS) 
Cheila equestris Linnaeus, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Conus fergusoni Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Conus cf. C. lucidus Wood, loc. 27249 (CAS) 


VoL. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA ISLAND 29 


Cylichna ct. C. defuncta Baker and Hanna, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Cymatium lineatum Broderip, loc. 1305 (CAS) 

Cypraea nigropunctata Gray, locs. 1305; 27249 (CAS) 
Cytharella camarina Dall, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Diodora alta C. B. Adams, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Engina pyrostoma Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Erato (Hespererato) marginata galapagensis Schilder, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Eulimostraca cf. E. galapagensis Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Fissurella cf. F. macrotrema Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Fissurella virescens Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Fusinus dupetitthouarsii Valenciennes, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Gastrocopta munita Reibisch, loc. 27249 (CAS) [a land snail] 
Granula cf. G. minor C. B. Adams, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Granula cf. G. polita Carpenter, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Granula species, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Granulina margaritula Carpenter, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Hipponix pilosus Deshayes, locs. 1305; 27249 (CAS) 
Hipponix pilosus Deshayes, loc. 1305; 27249 (CAS) 

Tselica cf. I. kochi Strong and Hertlein, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Malea ringens Swainson, loc. 1305 (CAS) 

* Mangelia cf. M. hancocki Hertlein and Strong, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Mitra gausapata Reeve, loc. 1305 (CAS) 

Mitra lens Mawe, loc. 1305 (CAS) 

Modulus cerodes A. Adams, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Nassarius nodicinctus A. Adams, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

* Nerita oligopleura Dall and Ochsner, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Odostomia (Menestho) aequisculpta Carpenter, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Odostomia (Miralda) galapagensis Dall and Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Odostomia (Chrysallida) rinella Dall and Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Oliva species, locs. 27249; 31838 (CAS) 

Pedipes angulatus C. B. Adams, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Persicula imbricata Hinds, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Persicula cf. P. phrygia Dall, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Persicula species, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Polinices dubius Récluz, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Polinices uber Valenciennes, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Pyramidella (Triptychus) ct. P. (T.) olssoni Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Pyramidella (Voluspa) species, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Pyrene castanea Sowerby, locs. 1305; 31838 (CAS) 
Pyrene fuscata Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Pyrene haemastoma Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Rissoina cf. R. firmata C. B. Adams, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Rissoina signae Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Strombina gibberula Sowerby, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Tectarius galapagensis Stearns, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

* Tegula forbesi Dall and Ochsner, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Tegula snodgrassi Pilsbry and Vanatta, locs. 1305; 27249 (CAS) 
Triphora cf. T. galapagensis Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Triphora cf. T. panamensis Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 


30 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Trivia pacifica Gray, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Trivia radians Lamarck, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Turbo agonistes Dall and Ochsner, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

* Turbo vermiculosus Dall and Ochsner, locs. 27249; 31838 (CAS) 
Turbonilla (Chemnitzia) houseri Dall and Bartsch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Turritella broderipiana marmorata Kiener, loc. 27249 (CAS) 
Vermicularia eburnea Reeve, loc. 27249 (CAS) 

Volvarina taeniolata Morch, loc. 27249 (CAS) 


REMARKS ON THE AGE AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE FAUNA 


This list contains 102 identified species, 1 coral, 2 echinoids, 26 pelecypods, 
and 73 gastropods. Of these, 7, and probably 8, are extinct. Twenty-eight 
species are only provisionally identified but are compared with known species. 
In addition to the 102 species, 8 forms are identified only as to genus. 

The percentage of extinct species in the present faunal assemblage is approxi- 
mately 7.8 percent. However, a greater number of extinct species evidently occur 
at the present locality as Dall and Ochsner described additional extinct species 
from apparently the same locality. They also described a number of extinct 
species from what they believed to be approximately correlative strata on Santa 
Cruz (Indefatigable) Island. Dall and Ochsner considered the age of the fauna 
which they reported from those two islands to be of probable Pliocene age. Five 
of the eight extinct species in the present faunal list have not been reported from 
fossil assemblages of Pleistocene age from either Isabela (Albemarle) or from 
San Salvador (James) Island. Furthermore, the occurrence of the fossils in ashy 
beds (which in some places are decidedly indurated), interbedded with volcanic 
flows, lends support to the viewpoint that these beds are of Pliocene rather than 
of Pleistocene age. McBirney and Williams (1969, p. 19) mentioned two lavas 
on Baltra Island reported to be 1.47 million years old. 

Another factor contributing to the belief that the present fauna is of Plio- 
cene age is the fact that Anodontia spherica Dall and Ochsner (reported from 
strata of Pliocene age in the Galapagos Islands) was reported by Pilsbry and 
Olsson (1941, p. 57) to occur abundantly and to be a characteristic species of 
their “Zone H” in strata referred to Pliocene age at Punta Blanca, Ecuador. 
Ten species in the present faunal list were included among those reported from 
that locality. 

Most of the Recent species in this assemblage are known living in Galapagos 
waters. Those not known from there are chiefly elements of the Panamic fauna, 
but further collecting may reveal their presence in the Galapagos Archipelago. 
A consideration of the habitat of the Recent species in this fauna leads one to 
infer that the fossil forms lived under conditions similar to those now prevailing 
in the Galapagos Islands, namely, warm, shallow water. 


Vot. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA ISLAND 31 


An interesting occurrence among the fossil forms is that of a land snail, 
Gastrocopta munita Reibisch. This species now lives on Baltra (South Seymour) 
Island (Hertlein, 1932b, p. 69) as well as on most of the other larger islands in 
the Archipelago. 


SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY 
PELECYPODA 


Chlamys (Nodipecten) magnifica Sowerby. 
(Figures 5, 15, 25.) 


Pecten magnificus SOWERBY, variety a, Proc. Zool. Soc. London for 1835, p. 109, issued 
October 9, 1835. “Hab ad Insulas Gallapagos.” “A single specimen of var. a was found 
in a coral sand at a depth of six fathoms.” SowerBy, Thes. Conch., vol. 1, p. 65, pl. 15 
(Pecten, pl. 5), fig. 114, 1842. “East Columbia.” [lapsus calami for West “Columbia.” 
Locality doubtful.] Rrrve, Conch. Icon., vol. 8, Pecten, species 9, pl. 2, fig. 9, 1852. 
“Tsle of Plata, West Columbia (in coral sand at a depth of from six to seventeen 
fathoms); Cuming.” [Locality doubtful.] Kopert, Syst. Conch—Cab. von Martini 
und Chemnitz, Spondylus und Pecten, Bd. 7, Abt. 2, p. 164, pl. 46, fig. 1, 1888. (Descrip- 
tion and illustration from Reeve.) 

Pecten (Lyropecten) magnificus Sowerby, GRANT and GALE, Mem. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist., 
vol. 1, p. 182, pl. 9, fig. 1; pl. 10, fig. 6, 1931. Galapagos Islands. 

Nodipecten magnificus Sowerby, Grau, Allan Hancock Pac. Exped., vol. 23, p. 132, pl. 44, 
1959. “Galapagos Islands. (Ecuador doubtful.)” 

Lyropecten (Nodipecten) magnificus Sowerby, Otsson, Mollusks of the Tropical Eastern 
Pacific (Paleo. Res. Inst.: Ithaca, New York), p. 161, pl. 22, fig. 1, 1961. (Illustration 
from Reeve, 1852). 


Two left valves, one nearly complete, the other only one half of a valve were 
collected at locality 27249 (CAS). The larger specimen is 126 mm. long and 
122.3 mm. high. There are 13 or 14 radial ribs. The entire valve is covered 
with radial striae of which about 5 or 6 occur in each interspace. The ribs are 
decidedly nodose. The nodes are hollow and develop in the areas of “ledges” 
(Moore, 1934, p. 216) between concentric constrictions of the valve. The 
nodosity on the east American species, Chlamys (Nodipecten) nodosa Linnaeus, 
increases from north to south in its range into warmer waters. 

A small left valve of C. magnifica 49 mm. high, was reported by Hertlein 
and Strong (1939, p. 369) from a raised beach on San Salvador (James) Island. 

Two Recent right valves in the collections of the California Academy of 
Sciences, the larger one 127 mm. high, were collected by Ochsner on the beach 
at Baltra (South Seymour) Island. These are devoid of nodes. The color is 
bright red. 

One right valve 59.8 mm. long and 60 mm. high, in the Academy’s collection, 
received from Jacqueline De Roy, was dredged in 9 to 18 meters (5 to 10 fathoms) 
off Santa Fé (Barrington) Island. 


32 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 1. Anodontia spherica Dall and Ochsner. Hypotype, left valve, no. 13653 (Calif. 
Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 802 (CAS), about 1% miles northeast of 
the settlement of Vilamil, Isabela (Albemarle) Island, Galapagos Islands, elevated beach 
deposit, about 12 meters (40 feet) above sea level. Pleistocene. Length 65 mm. Ficure 2. 
Anodontia spherica Dall and Ochsner. Hypotype, right valve, no. 13654 (Calif Acad. Sci. 
Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 803 (CAS), from virtually the same locality as the 


Vor. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA ISLAND 33 


Anodontia spherica Dall and Ochsner. 
(Figures 1, 2, 6, 7.) 


Lucina spherica DALL AND OcusNER, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., Fourth Ser., vol. 17, no. 4, p. 
121, pl. 3, fig. 8; pl. 4, figs. 2, 7, June 22, 1928; “from upper horizon (zone D) on east 
shore of Indefatigable Island, Galapages Greuv. Probably Pliocene.” 

Loripinus (Pegophysema) spherica Dall and Ochsner, Pitspry AND Otsson, Proc. Acad. 
Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 93, p. 57, 1941. Pliocene of Punta Blanca, Ecuador. 

Anodontia (Lissosphaira) spherica Dall and Ochsner, Orsson, Mollusks of the tropical 
eastern Pacific (Paleo. Research Inst.: Ithaca, New York), p. 222, pl. 30, fig. 2, 1961. 
(Figured specimen from Cabo Blanca, Ecuador, Pliocene. Reported as Recent from 
“Lower California to Ecuador. Columbia: Isla del Gallo.”) Also earlier records. 
Specimens assigned to this species in the present collection [locs. 1305 and 

27251 (CAS) | are casts. Olsson reported this species living from Baja California 

to Ecuador but it has not been reported from the Panamic Province by other 

authors. I have not seen Recent specimens. 

The deeply depressed posterior dorsal area on Anodontia spherica easily 
serves to separate it from A. edentuloides from the Gulf of California. The 
presence of well differentiated, deeply impressed, dorsal areas was the basis for 
the proposal of the subgenus Lissophazra Olsson. 

Large specimens of A. spherica are 74 mm. long. Berry (1968, p. 71) men- 
tioned specimens of 4. edentuloides which are 75 mm. long. 

Marks (1951, pp. 67-70), discussed the shell characters of Anodontia and 
Pegophysema, and some of the species referred to those groups. Apparently, the 
species cited by Marks (p. 69) as “C. densata” Dall and Ochsner is referable 
to A. spherica. 

A large globose species, 82 mm. long, Anodota sphericula Basedow, was 
reported by Ludbrook (1959, p. 227, pl. 3, figs. 1, 2, 3; pl. 5, figs. 1, 4) from 
strata of Pliocene age in Australia. The posterior dorsal portion of the shell 
of that species lacks a depressed area: it is a typical Anodontia believed to be 
related to A. philippiana Reeve in the western Pacific. 


Diplodonta subquadrata baltrana Hertlein, new subspecies. 
(Figures 8 and 11.) 


DescripTIon. Shell subquadrate, somewhat anteriorly attenuated, thin, 
beaks very low, anterior dorsal margin only slightly sloping; sculptured only 


co 

specimen shown in figure 1. Length 58 mm. Ficure 3. Trivia radians Lamarck. Hypotype 
no. 13668 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra 
(South Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Length 18 mm. FicureE 4. 
Trivia radians Lamarck. Ventral view of the specimen shown in figure 3. FicurE 5. Chlamys 
(Nodipecten) magnifica Sowerby. Hypotype, right valve, no. 13652 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. 
Geol. Type Coll. ), from locality 23167 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Galapagos 
Islands. Recent. W. H. Ochsner Collector. Height 85 mm. 


34 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SEr. 


13 


Ficure 6. Anodontia spherica Dall and Ochsner. Hypotype, right valve, no 13655 (Calif. 
Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 803 (CAS), about 1% miles northeast of 
the settlement of Vilamil, Isabela (Albemarle) Island, Galapagos Islands, elevated beach 
deposit, about 12 meters (40 feet) above sea level. Pleistocene. Length 54.5 mm. FIGURE 7. 
Anodontia spherica Dall and Ochsner. View of the interior of the specimen shown in figure 


Vor. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA ISLAND 35 


with fine concentric lines of growth. Dimensions: length 22.6 mm., height 20 
mm., convexity (both valves) 14.6 mm. 

Holotype, no. 13656, and paratype, a left valve, no. 13657 (California Acad- 
emy of Sciences Department of Geology Type Collection), from locality 27249 
(CAS), white and yellowish tuffaceous strata interbedded with lava, on the 
south side of the bay on the west side of Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Gala- 
pagos Islands. Late Pliocene. L. G. Hertlein, collector. 

CoMMENTS. Specimens of this new subspecies, in general features, resemble 
fossil forms of Diplodonta subquadrata Carpenter (see illustrations by Durham, 
1950, pl. 19, figures 4, 4a, 1950) from Santa Inez Bay, Baja California, Mexico. 
The present fossils from Baltra Island differ from Carpenter’s species in the 
narrower, somewhat attenuated anterior end and in the more nearly horizontal 
anterior dorsal margin. The general shape of the type specimen of the new 
subspecies resembles that of the Recent specimen of D. subquadrata from the 
Galapagos Islands illustrated by Hertlein and Strong (1947, plate 1, figure 11), 
more than it does that of the fossils illustrated by Durham. 

The paratype, 21.2 mm. long, is less attenuated anteriorly than the holotype. 
An imperfectly preserved right valve also was collected at the type locality. 


Protothaca (Tropithaca) cf. P. (T.) seymourensis Dall and Ochsner. 
(Figures 38, 39.) 


Twenty-one single valves of a venerid varying from 11 mm. to 39.4 mm. 
in length are present in the collection from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South 
Seymour) Island. These vary greatly in shape and sculpture. 


< 


6. Ficure 8. Diplodonta subquadrata baltrana Hertlein, new subspecies. Holotype no. 
13656 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South 
Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Length 22.5 mm. Ficure 9. Nioche cf. 
N. zorritensis Olsson. Hypotype, left valve, no. 13658 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type 
Coll.), from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Late 
Pliocene. Length 39.5 mm. Ficure 10. Nioche cf. N. zorritensis Olsson. View of the interior 
of the specimen shown in figure 9. Ficure 11. Diplodonta subquadrata baltrana Hertlein, 
new subspecies. Dorsal view of the specimen shown in figure 8. Ficure 12. Nerita 
oligopleura Dall and Ochsner. Hypotype no. 13666 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), 
from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Late 
Pliocene. Height 14.5 mm. View showing fine threadlets between major concentric cords. 
Ficure 13. Nerita oligopleura Dall and Ochsner. Hypotype no. 13667 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. 
Geol. Type Coll.), from the same locality as the specimen illustrated in figure 12. Apertural 
view. Height 17.5 mm. Ficure 14. Nerita oligopleura Dall and Ochsner. Dorsal view of the 
specimen shown in figure 13. Ficure 15. Chlamys (Nodipecten) magnifica Sowerby. 
Hypotype, left valve, no. 13676 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 
27249 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Height 
128 mm. 


36 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 16. Turbo agonistes Dall and Ochsner. Hypotype no. 13671 (Calif. Acad. Sci. 
Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 38977 (CAS), Baranco, Punta Nunez, Santa Cruz 
(Indefatigable) Island, Galapagos Islands. Recent. Jacqueline DeRoy collector. Height 
21 mm. Ficure 17. Turbo agonistes Dall and Ochsner. Dorsal view of the specimens shown 
in figure 16. Figure 18. Turbo agonistes Dall and Ochsner. Hypotype no. 13672 (Calif. 


Vor. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA ISLAND 37 


One small specimen in the present series is quite similar in outline and sculp- 
ture to the early stage of growth of the type specimen of Chione seymourensts 
Dall and Ochsner from the same area. 

The type specimen of Chione seymourensis Dall and Ochsner (1928, p. 123, 
pl. 3, figs. 1 and 5) was described “from upper horizon, Seymour Island, Gala- 
pagos Group. Probably Pliocene.” It is a right valve, ovately rectangular in 
outline (see figs. 36, 37), lacks an escutcheon, and the radial sculpture is some- 
what reduced in strength as a result of erosion. Dall and Ochsner mentioned a 
similarity between their species and Chione pertincta Dall, a Recent species 
living in the Galapagos Islands. Compared with C. pertincta, the type specimen 
of C. seymourensis is in general, more elongated, thinner, and it has finer radial 
sculpture. 

Compared with Protothaca grata Say, the type specimen of C. seymourensis 
is more elongate in outline, the radial sculpture is coarser, the lunule is narrower, 
and the median cardinal tooth in the right valve is larger. 

The variation in shape and sculpture in the present series of specimens is 
similar to that in a series of Recent specimens of Protothaca grata Say (the type 
species of the subgenus Tropithaca Olsson), and most of them are here referred 
to Say’s species. 


GASTROPODA 


Tegula forbesi Dall and Ochsner. 
(Figures 24, 29.) 
Tegula forbesi DALL AND OcHSNER, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., Fourth Ser., vol. 17, no. 4, p. 


116, pl. 2, fig. 13, June 22, 1928; “from upper horizon on Seymour Island, Galapagos 
Group. Probably Pliocene.” 


< 


Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) 
Island, Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Height 28.5 mm. Ficure 19. Turbo agonistes 
Dall and Ochsner. Dorsal view of the specimen shown in figure 18. Ficure 20. Turbo 
agonistes Dall and Ochsner. View of the exterior of the operculum of the specimen shown 
in figures 16 and 17. Ficure 21. Turbo agonistes Dall and Ochsner. View of the interior 
side of the operculum shown in figure 20. Ficure 22. Turbo agonistes Dall and Ochsner. 
Hypotype no. 13673 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from the same locality as 
the specimen shown in Figures 18 and 19. Height 33 mm. Dorsal view of an unusually 
large specimen. Ficure 23. Turbo agonistes Dall and Ochsner. Apertural view of the speci- 
men shown in figure 22. Ficure 24. Tegula forbesi Dall and Ochsner. Hypotype no. 13660 
(Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South 
Seymour) Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Height 26 mm. FuicurE 25. Chlamys 
(Nodipecten) magnifica Sowerby. Hypotype no. 13652 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type 
Coll.), from locality 23167 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. W. 
H. Ochsner Collector. Recent. Height 85 mm. View of the interior of the specimen shown 
in figure 5. 


38 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 47TH SER. 


Ficure 26. Turritella broderipiana marmorata Kiener. Hypotype no. 13669 (Calif. Acad. 
Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) Island, 
Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Height (incomplete) 53 mm. Ficure 27. Turritella 
broderipiana marmorata Kiener. Dorsal view of the specimen shown in figure 26. FIGURE 28. 
Turritella broderipiana marmorata Kiener. Hypotype no. 13670 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. 


Vor. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA ISLAND 39 


A few specimens of this species were collected at locality 27249 (CAS). The 
largest specimen is about 31 mm. in height, the lest whorl is 48 mm. in maximum 
width. The concentric sculpture is much finer than that of Tegula aureotincta 
Forbes from California. This sculpture is more pronounced and regular on the 
upper surface of the whorls, and on the base much coarser, than that on specimens 
of T. rugosa A. Adams from the Gulf of California. 


Turbo agonistes Dall and Ochsner. 

(Figures 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23.) 

Turbo agonistes DALL AND OCHSNER, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., Fourth Ser., vol. 17, no. 4, p. 
115, pl. 2, figs. 12, 16, June 22, 1928; “on east shore of Indefatigable Island, Galapagos 
Group. Probably Pliocene.” 

A number of fossil specimens of this species were collected at locality 27249 

(CAS). The shell of this species is quite different from any other described form. 
Recently this species was found living in Galapagos waters. Four specimens 

from off Santa Cruz (Indefatigable) Island collected by Jacqueline De Roy; and 

one taken by Carmen Angermeyer 1’ miles west of Baltra (South Seymour) 

Island, were presented to the Academy. Recent shells are attractively colored, 

purplish on the base of the body whorl and orange or greenish above. 


< 


Geol. Type Coll.), from the same locality as the specimen shown in figures 26 and 27. 
Height (incomplete) 40 mm. Ficure 29. Tegula forbesi Dall and Ochsner. Hypotype no. 
13660 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South 
Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Width 24 mm. Basal view of the 
specimen shown in figure 24. Ficure 30. Polinices dubius Récluz. Hypotype no. 13662 
(Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South 
Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Height 37.5 mm. Ficure 31. Polinices 
dubius Récluz. Apertural view of the specimen shown in figure 30. Ficure 32. Polinices 
dubius Récluz. Hypotype no. 13663 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 
804 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Height 40.5 
mm. Ficure 33. Polinices dubius Récluz. Hypotype no. 13664 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. 
Type Coll.), from the same locality as the specimen shown in figure 32. Height 39.4 mm. 
Apertural view. Ficure 34. Polinices dubius Récluz. Apertural view of the specimen shown 
in figure 33, showing notch in callus of inner lip. Frcure 35. Turbo vermiculosus Dall and 
Ochsner. Hypotype no. 13661 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 
27249 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Height 
34.6 mm. Ficure 36. Chione seymourensis Dall and Ochsner. Holotype, right valve, no. 
2970 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), “from upper horizon, Seymour Island, Gala- 
pagos Group Probably Pliocene.” Length 34 mm. Ficure 37. Chione seymourensis Dall 
and Ochsner. View of the hinge of the specimen shown in figure 36. Ficure 38. Protothaca 
(Tropithaca) cf. P. (T.) seymourensis Dall and Ochsner. Hypotype, right valve, no. 13659 
(Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.), from locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South 
Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands. Late Pliocene. Length 21 mm. Ficure 39. Protothaca 
(Tropithaca) cf. P. (T.) seymourensis Dall and Ochsner. View of the hinge of the specimen 
shown in figure 38. 


40 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Turbo vermiculosus Dall and Ochsner. 
(Figure 35.) 


Turbo vermiculosus DALL AND OcusNER, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., Fourth Ser., vol. 17, no. 4, 
p. 115, pl. 2, fig. 15, June 22, 1928; “frem upper horizon, Seymour Island, Galapagos 
Group. Probably Pliocene.” 


Three specimens of this species, none perfectly preserved, are present from 
locality 27249 (CAS), Baltra (South Seymour) Island. The largest specimen 
(figure 35) is 34.8 mm. high, the maximum diameter 23 mm. 

This species has an unusually high spire for the genus. The surface micro- 
sculpture “‘minutely vermiculately granulose and punctate,’ as mentioned by 
Dall and Ochsner, is quite different from any described species of Turbo from 
the western Americas. 

The shape and sculpture of the present species somewhat resemble that of 
Turbo caboblanquensis Weisbord (1962, p. 84, pl. 6, figs. 4, 5) described from 
strata of Pliocene age in Venezuela but the shell of that species is umbilicate. 


Polinices dubius Récluz. 

(Figures 30, 31, 32, 33, 34.) 

Natica dubia RéEctuz, Proc. Zool. Soc. London for 1843, p. 209, issued June, 1844 “Hab. 
Chile? H. Cuming.” Sowersy, Thes. Conch., vol. 5, p. 86, pl. 458 (Natica, pl. 5), fig. 
56, 1883. “Chili.” Rrrvr, Conch. Icon., vol. 9, Natica, species 41, pl. 10, figs. 41a, 41b, 
1855. “Hab. Chili?” Tryon, Man. Conch., vol. 8, p. 47, pl. 16, fig. 50, 1886. “Chili, Peru.” 

Polynices dubia Récluz, STEARNS, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 16, no. 942, pp. 401, 446, 1893. 
“Indefatigable Island.” 


One fairly well preserved specimen and four rather imperfect ones were 
collected at locality 27249 (CAS). These specimens agree exactly with the 
specimens identified by Dall and Ochsner under the name ‘“‘Neverita cf. reclusiana 
Deshayes” (see figs. 32, 33, 34), from locality 804 (CAS). That locality is 
approximately equivalent to locality 27249 (CAS). 

One of the specimens from locality 804 (CAS) retains most of the umbilical 
pad. The shape of the shell as well as the details of the callus agree closely with 
illustrations of Polinices dubius, a species reported by Stearns from the Recent 
fauna of the Galapagos Islands. Ranson (1959, p. 68) reported this species 
from an elevated beach at Guadalupito, Peru. 

The general shape of the Galapagos fossils is similar to that of the fossil 
species described as ‘‘Natica solida” by Sowerby (1846, p. 255; see ed. 3, 1896, 
p. 612, pl. 3, figs. 40, 41.) from “Navidad, Chile; Santa Cruz,ePataconiae? 
| Miocene: Herm, 1969, p. 87] but the callus on the Galapagos species is much 
more extensive and with an indentation on the umbilical margin. Sowerby’s 
species was renamed Natica darwinti by Hutton (1886a, p. 334; see also 1886b, 
p. 214) because of an earlier usage of the name WNatica solida by Blainville 
(1825, p. 251). 


Vor. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA ISLAND 41 


Nerita oligopleura Dall and Ochsner. 
(Figures 12, 13, 14.) 


Nerita oligopleura DALL AND OCHSNER, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., Fourth Ser., vol. 17, no. 4, p. 
114, pl. 2, fig. 11; pl. 6, fig. 15, June 22; “upper horizon, Seymour Island, Galapagos 
Group. Probably Pliocene.” 


About 30 specimens of this species were collected at locality 27249 (CAS). 
The smallest one is 6 mm. high, the largest one 20.5 mm. high and 21 mm. wide. 

There are four coarse spiral ridges on the shell and, on well preserved speci- 
mens, two small spiral threads are visible in the interspaces between the ribs. 

The shell of this species is quite different from any described west American 
species, as pointed out by Dall and Ochsner. The Galapagos fossil species bears 
a general resemblance to Nerita asperata Dujardin from the Helvetian, Middle 
Miocene, of France, illustrated by Cossmann and Peyrot (1917, pl. 7, figures 
83, 84). However, close relationship with that species is not postulated. 


Turritella broderipiana marmorata Kiener. 
(Figures 26, 27, 28.) 


Turritella marmorata KIENER, Spéc. Gén. et Icon. Coq. Viv., Famille Turbinacées, Twrritella, 
p. 23, pl. 8, fig. 1 (two figs.), 1843-1844. “Habite.” 


Over a dozen specimens of a Turritella, mostly incomplete, were collected 
at locality 27249 (CAS). These agree closely with Kiener’s illustrations of 
Turritella marmorata. 

Kiener’s figures depict a rather slender, elongated shell, the whorls nearly 
flat-sided, sculptured with fine, concentric threads, cream-colored with narrow 
wavy longitudinal brownish-violet lines or flecks. 

Reeve (1849, species 6, plate 2, figures 6a, 6b) placed T. marmorata in the 
synonymy of 7. broderipiana under which name two figures were shown. One 
(6a) represents a shell with fairly wide whorls, somewhat wider posteriorly below 
the suture, resulting in a slightly sinuous outline of the outer lip of the last whorl. 
The form shown in this illustration is similar to T. gonostoma Valenciennes. 
The other figure (6b) represents a slender, elongated shell with nearly flat-sided 
whorls comparable to Kiener’s illustrations of 7. marmorata. 

Turritella broderipiana d’Orbigny (1840, p. 388), was originally described 
but not illustrated from “les environs de Payta, ou elle a été péchée sur les fonds 
de sable.” The type specimen illustrated by Keen (1966, p. 3, pl. 1, fig. 21) 
reveals a slender, elongated shell with slightly concave whorls. Earlier, Keen 
(1958, p. 290) considered T. marmorata to be a variant of the extremely variable 
T. gonostoma Valenciennes (1832, p. 275; Kiener, 1843-1844, pp. 21-22, pl. 
10, fig. 1). That species was originally described but not illustrated from 
“Habitat ad oras Americae australis in portum Acapulco Mexicanorum.” The 
posterior portion of the whorls on 7. gonostoma is often the widest; the color 


42 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


of rather dense gray-black mottled markings in contrast to the much narrower 
flammules of 7. broderipiana and T. b. marmorata. 

A Recent specimen in the collections of the California Academy of Sciences, 
closely resembling Kiener’s illustrations of 7. marmorata, collected by D. L. 
Frizzell at Cabo Blanco, Peru, is 116 mm. long (incomplete), the body whorl 
22.9 mm. in diameter. Other specimens collected at the same locality and at 
Paita Bay, and at the mouth of the Brazos River at San Ramon south of Sechura, 
Peru, have similar color markings but the shells are much less tapering with 
correspondingly wider apical angle. One such shell collected by J. G. Marks at 
San Pedro, Ecuador, is 133 mm. long (incomplete), the diameter of the last 
whorl 38 mm. Evidently the slender and the broad shells either represent ele- 
ments of a very variable series, or two distinct forms are living in the region of 
Ecuador and Peru. 

The fossils from the Galapagos Islands closely resemble the slender form 
with flat-sided whorls shown in Kiener’s illustrations of 7. marmorata. In this 
character they differ from the type specimen of 7. broderipiana (with slightly 
concave whorls) shown in Keen’s (1966) illustration. On that basis, in the 
present paper, the form described by Kiener is treated as a subspecies of T. 
broderipiana. 

Pilsbry and Olsson (1941, p. 43) mentioned that Turritella alturana Spieker, 
described from strata of Miocene age in Peru is ‘‘so close to the recent species 
| 7. broderipiana| that they cannot be consistently separated.” 

The subgenus Broderiptella Olsson was proposed to include the 7. broderipiana 
group represented in the northern South American region at least since middle 
Miocene time. This group of turritellas was discussed by Merriam (1941, pp. 
50-51) and by Woodring (1957, pp. 110-112). 


LITERATURE CITED 


BANFIELD, A. F., D. St. Crarir, anp C. H. BEHre, Jr. 
1956. Geology of Isabela (Albemarle) Island. Archipiélago de Colon (Galapagos). 
Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 215-234, pls. 
1-4, figs. 1-4 in text, February. 
BErRY, S. S. 
1968. Some unusual mollusks, mainly Panamic. The American Malacological Union, 
Inc., Annual Reports for 1967, pp. 71-72, (1968). 
BLAINVILLE, H. D., DE 
1825. Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, vol. 34, p. 251, June. 
CauQuoiIn, MICHELE 
1969. Mollusques récoltés par M. Hoffstetter sur les cotes de l’Equateur et aux Iles 
Galapagos. Mactridae. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle 
(Paris), 2° Sér., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1019-1030, fig. 1, 1968 (June 6, 1969). 
CHESTERMAN, C. W. 
1963. Contributions to the petrography of the Galapagos, Cocos, Malpelo, Cedros, San 
Benito, Tres Marias, and White Friars Islands. Proceedings of the California 


Vor. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA ISLAND 43 


Academy of Sciences, Fourth Series, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 339-362, 7 figs., 
September 10. [Baltra (South Seymour) Island, pp. 344-345.] 
Cuuss, L. G. 
1933. Geology of Galapagos, Cocos, and Easter Islands. With petrology of Galapagos 
Islands by C. Richardson. Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Bulletin 110, pp. 1-67 
[Chubb, pp. 1-44; Richardson, pp. 45-67], pls. 1-5, figs. 1-9 in text. 
CossMANn, M., AND A. PEyROT 
1916. Conchologie Néogénique de L’Aquitaine. Scaphopodes et Gastropodes. Actes 
Societé Linnéenne de Bordeaux, tome 69, pp. 1-384, pls. 1-10, figs. 1-50 in text. 
[Also issued separately, tome 3, Livraison 1, December, 1917. |] 
DatL, W. H. 
1924. Note on fossiliferous strata of the Galapagos Islands explored by W. H. Ochsner 
of the Expedition of the California Academy of Sciences in 1905-6. Geological 
Magazine, vol. 61, no. 723, pp. 428-429. 
Dat, W. H., anp W. H. OcHSNER 
1928. Tertiary and Pleistocene mollusks from the Galapagos Islands. Proceedings of 
the California Academy of Sciences, Fourth Series, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 89-139, 
pls. 2-7, 5 text-figs., June 22. 


Darwin, C. R. 
1846. Geological observations on South America. Being the third part of the Geology 
of the voyage of the Beagle .... during 1832 to 1836. (London), pp. i-vii, 


1-279, 5 pls. (1 geol. col.), 1 map, text illustr. [From the Catalogue of the 
British Museum, A-D, p. 422, 1903.] 
1896. Geological observations. On the volcanic islands and parts of South America 
visited during the voyage of H. M. S. ‘Beagle’, edition 3, New York: D. 
Appleton and Co., pp. I-XIII, 1-648, figs. 1-40 in text, pls. 1-5. [Galapagos 
Archipelago, pp. 110-131]. 
DurHAM, J. W. 
1950. 1940 E. W. Scripps cruise to the Gulf of California. Part II. Megascopic paleon- 
tology and marine stratigraphy. Geological Society of America, Memoir 43, 
pp. VII-VIII, 1-216, pls. 1-48, August 10. 
Eames, F. E. 
1951. The type species of Anodontia Link 1807. Proceedings of the Malacological 
Society of London, vol. 28, pt. 6, pp. 232-233, June 8. 
FISCHER-PIETTE, E. 
1969. Mollusques récoltés par M. Hofistetter sur les cotes de l’Equateur et des Iles 
Galapagos. Veneridae. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle 
(Paris), 2° Sér., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 998-1018, pls. 1-3, 1968 (June 6, 1969). 
Fraser, C. McLEAn 
1943. General account of the Scientific work of the Velero III in the eastern Pacific, 
1931-41. Part I. Historical Introduction, Velero III, Personnel. Allan Hancock 
Pacific Expeditions I (1): 1-48, pls. 1-16, July 1943. Part II. Geographical 
and Biological associations. 1(2): 49-258, pls. 17-128, December, 1943. Part 
III. A ten year list of the Velero III Collecting Stations. 1 (3): 259-424, 
charts 1-115; an appendix of Collecting Stations of the Allan Hancock 
Foundation for the year 1942, pp. 425-431, December. 
Herm, D. 
1969. Marines Pliozin und Pleistozan in Nord- und Mittel-Chile unter besonderer 
Beriicksichtigung der Entwicklung der Mollusken-Faunen. Zitteliana, Abhand- 


44 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


lungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung fiir Paldontologie und _historische 
Geologie, 2, pp. 1-159, pls. 1-18, figs. 1-46, September 1. 
HERTLEIN, L. G. 

1932a. [Jn] A Pioneer Heritage, by Sam T. Clover, Los Angeles; Saturday Night Pub- 
lishing Company, pp. 206-207. 

1932b. Gastrocopta munita on South Seymour Island, Galapagos Group. Nautilus, vol. 
46, no. 2, pp. 69-70, October (issued October 22). 

HeErTLEIN, L. G., AND A. M. STRONG 

1939. Marine Pleistocene Mollusks from the Galapagos Islands. Proceedings of the 
California Academy of Sciences, Fourth Series, vol. 23, no. 24, pp. 367-380, 
pl. 32, July 20. 

1947. Eastern Pacific Expeditions of the New York Zoological Society. KXXIX. 
Mollusks from the west coast of Mexico and Central America. Part V. 
Zoologica, New York Zoological Society, volume 31, part 4, pp. 129-150, pl. 
1, February 21. 

1955. Marine mollusks collected at the Galapagos Islands during the voyage of the 
Velero III, 1931-1932. [Jn] Essays in the Natural Sciences in honor of Captain 
Allan Hancock on the occasion of his birthday July 26, 1955. (University of 
Southern California Press: Los Angeles), pp. I-XII, 1-345. (Hertlein and 
Strong, pp. 111-144, pl. A). 

HOFFsTETTER, R. 

1956. Lexique Stratigraphique International, vol. 5. Amérique Latine. Fascicule 5a. 
Ecuador. (Appéndice Islas Galapagos o Archipiélago de Colon). Paris 8°, 191 
pp. [Baltra (South Seymour) Island, pp. 155—157.] 

Hutton, F. W. 

1886a. New species of Tertiary shells. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand 
Institute, vol. 18, pp. 333-335, May. 

1886b. The mollusca of the Pareora and Oamaru systems of New Zealand. Proceedings 
of the Linnaean Society of New South Wales, second series, vol. 1, pt. 1, pp. 
205-237, May 25. 

Keren, A. Myra 

1958. Sea Shells of Tropical West America. Marine mollusks from Lower California 
to Colombia. (Stanford University Press: Stanford, California), pp. I—XII, 
1-624, 1709 figs. in text [unnumbered frontispiece (colored) p. XI], pls. I-X 
in color. 

1966. West American types at the British Museum (Natural History). III. Alcide 
d’Orbigny’s South American collection. The Veliger, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-7, pl. 
Is Vialby al. 

Lewis, G. E. 

1956. Galapagos Islands (Archipiélago de Colon) Province. Geological Society of 
America, Memoir 65, pp. 289-291, June 15. [Baltra (South Seymour) Island, 
p. 290.] 

LupBrook, NELLIE H. 

1959. A widespread Pliocene molluscan fauna with Anodontia in South Australia. 
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, vol. 82, pp. 219-233, 
pls. 1-5, April. 

Marks, J. G. 
1951. Miocene stratigraphy and Paleontology of southwestern Ecuador. Bulletins of 


Vor. XXXIX] HERTLEIN: PLIOCENE FOSSILS FROM BALTRA ISLAND 45 


American Paleontology, vol. 33, no. 139, pp. 1-162, pls. 1 (43)-9 (51), figs. 
1-12, December 20. 
McBrrney, A. R., AND WILLIAMs, H. 
1969. Geology and Petrology of the Galapagos Islands. (With chemical analyses by 
Ken-ichiro Aoki.) Geological Society of America, Memoir 118, pp. I-XIII, 
1-197, plates 1-21, figures 1-48 in text, tables 1-21. 
Menarp, H. W., T. E. CHASE, AnD S. M. SmitH 
1964. Galapagos Rise in the southeastern Pacific. Deep-Sea Research, vol. 11, no. 2, 
pp. 233-242, figs. 1-4, April. 
Merriam, C. W. 
1941. Fossil Turritellas from the Pacific Coast region of North America. University of 
California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geological Sciences, 
vol. 26, no. 1, pp. I-V, 1-214, pls. 1-41, figs. 1-19 in text, 1 map, March 8. 
Moore, H. B. 
1934. On “lJedging” in shells at Port Erin. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of 
London, vol. 21, part 3, pp. 213-217, pl. 22, December. 
OcHSNER, W. H. 
1906. Geology of the Galapagos Islands. Unpublished notes in the California Academy 
of Sciences. 
Otsson, A. A. 
1964. Neogene Mollusks from northwestern Ecuador. Paleontological Research Insti- 
tution, Ithaca, New York, pp. 1—256, pls. 1-38, October 28. 
D’ORBIGNY, A. 
1834-1847. Voyage dans l’Amérique Méridionale. Mollusques. Paris, vol. 5, pt. 3, 
pp. I-XLII, 1-758, atlas, pls. 1-85. 
Pirssry, H. A., anp A. A. OLsson 
1941. A Pliocene fauna from western Ecuador. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural 
Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 93, pp. 1-79, pls. 1-19, September 9. 
Ranson, G. 
1959. Mollusques de la plaine cotiere soulevée de Guadalupito, récoltés par M. Bernardo 
Boit. Journal de Conchyliologie, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 66-76, May 15. 


REEVE, L. 
1849. Conchologia Iconica, vol. 5, Turritella, plates I-XI, and explanations, May to 
June. 
SLEVIN, J. R. 


1959. The Galapagos Islands. A history of their exploration. Occasional Papers, Cali- 

fornia Academy of Sciences, no. XXV, pp. I-X, 1-150, figs. 1-31, December 22. 
SoweErBY, G. B., (Ist of the name) 

1846. Descriptions of Tertiary fossil shells from South America. [Jn] Darwin, C. A., 
Geological observations on South America. Appendix to Part II. [See Darwin.] 

1896. Edition 3, pp. 605-623, pls. 2-4. 

STEARNS, R. E. C. 

1893. Scientific Results of Explorations by the U. S. Fish Commission Steamer 
Albatross. XXV.—Report on the mollusks of the Galapagos Islands, with 
descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 
vol. XVI, no. 942, pp. 353-450, pls. 51, 52 (map), September 29. 

VALENCIENNES, A. 

1832. Coquilles univalves de l’Amérique Equinoxiale, recueillies pendant le voyage de 

MM. de Humboldt et Bonpland. [Jz] Humboldt, F. H. A., von, and A. J. A. 


46 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Bonpland, Voyage aux régions equinoxiales du nouveau continent. Paris, pt. 


2, Recueil d’observations de Zoologie et d’Anatomie comparée, vol. 2, pp. 262— 
SO), joll, S75 


WEISBORD, N. E. 


1962. 


Late Cenozoic Gastropods from northern Venezuela. Bulletins of American 
Paleontology, vol. 42, no. 193, pp. 1-672, pls. 1-48, March 5. 


Wi.iAMs, H. 


1966. 


Wotr, T. 
1895. 


Geology of the Galapagos Islands. [Jn] The Galapagos. Proceedings of the 
Symposium of the Galapagos International Scientific Project. R. I. Bowman, 
editor, University of California Press, pp. I-X VII, 1-318, illustrated. [Williams, 
Geology, pp. 65-70]. 


Die Galapagos-Inseln. Verhandlung der Gesellschaft fiir Erdkunde zu Berlin, 
Bd. 22, pp. 246-265, pl. 3 [map]. 


Wooprinc, W. P. 


1957. 


Geology and Paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining Parts of Panama. Geology 
and description of Tertiary mollusks (Gastropods: Trochidae to Turritellidae). 


United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 306—-A, pp. I-IV, 1-145, 
pls. 1-23, figs. 14 in text. 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XX XIX, No. 4, pp. 47-53; 2 figs.; 1 table April 6, 1972 


A NEW SPECIES OF THE SCORPIONFISH 
GENUS HELICOLENUS FROM THE 
NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN 


By 
Tokiharu Abe 


Tokai Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory, 

Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Katchidoki 5-5-1, Kyobashi P. O., 
Tokyo 104, and Zoological Institute, Faculty of Science, 
University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo 113, Japan 
and 


William N. Eschmeyer 


California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, 
California, U.S.A. 94118 


Apstract: Helicolenus avius is described as a new species in the fish family Scor- 
paenidae, subfamily Sebastinae. The type locality is the northwestern Pacific Ocean 
between Japan and Midway Island at the southern end of the Emperor Seamount 
Chain, 32°40/N., 172°17’E. to 35°05’N., 171°46’E., at a depth between 450 and 600 
meters. A description and 2 figures are provided. Remarks on the genus Helicolenus 
are given. 


INTRODUCTION 
In the summer of 1970, around 21 and 22 August, the Japanese vessel Daini- 
Oriento Maru of the Tokusui Company, Ltd., was conducting night-time trawling 
operations for Beryx spendens at the Emperor Seamount Chain between Japan 
and the Hawaiian Islands. At several stations a total of more than 250 kg. of 
specimens of a new scorpionfish of the genus Helicolenus was captured. The genus 
Helicolenus is virtually worldwide in distribution, containing temperate and tropi- 


1 Contribution no. B552 from the Tokai Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory, Tokyo. Supported in 
part by U. S. National Science Foundation Grant GB-—15811. 


[47] 


48 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


cal offshore species. According to Matsubara (1943), the genus Helicolenus, 
along with Sebastiscus, Hozukius, and Sebastes, constitutes the subfamily Sebas- 
tinae. Recently, Eschmeyer and Hureau (1971) suggested that the genus 
Sebastes may be a terminal North Pacific-evolving offshoot characterized by a 
reduced rather than an incipient suborbital stay. They suggested that the genus 
Sebastes may have evolved from a tropical ancestor, particularly one with a com- 
plete suborbital stay and one sharing the characters found in the worldwide tropi- 
cal and temperate genus Helicolenus and the Oriental genera Sebastiscus and 
Hozukius. The discovery of another species of the genus Helicolenus may help 
in understanding the evolution of the subfamily Sebastinae and the family Scor- 
paenidae. 

The new species is quite distinct from the other species referable to the genus 
Helicolenus, particularly in having reduced head spination, smaller scales, longer 
gill rakers, better developed toothed protuberances (dentigerous knobs) on the 
anterior ends of the premaxillaries, and a forked caudal fin. 

As a final introductory comment, we wish to mention that Helicolenus dac- 
tylopterus frequently is the main ingredient in French Bouillabaisse, or the 
Mediterranean fisherman’s stew. Perhaps this new species has similar qualities. 
Although some specimens were discarded, 245.8 kg. of the present new species was 
frozen quickly on board the collecting vessel and kept at —20°C. Mr. Tsujisaki, 
who collected the specimens, has informed us that the fish kept at this tempera- 
ture remain in good condition for sale for three months. Chemical analysis of 
flesh from one specimen measuring 21 cm. in standard length was made by Mr. 
Masa-aki Takeuchi (Tokai Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory) and showed 
the following: body weight 212.5 grams, edible part 27 percent, water of flesh 
72.6 percent, crude protein 19.2 percent, crude fat 5.6 percent, crude ash 1.3 
percent, and calories per 100 grams 126.2. Species of Helicolenus frequently are 
one of the dominant fishes in their habitat, and the new species may prove to be 
of commercial value. 

METHODS 


Methods of measuring follow Eschmeyer (1969) and are similar to methods 
used for other teleostean fishes with a few exceptions. Measurements originating 
from the anterior end of the upper jaw (head length, snout length, standard 
length, jaw length) are taken from the anterior end of the premaxillaries, includ- 
ing the dentigerous knobs; pectoral fin length is measured from the base of the 
first ray to the end of the longest ray, with the fin pointing back; caudal fin 
length is measured from the posterior end of the hypural plate to the most distal 
ray when the upper and lower caudal fin lobes are squeezed together. Termi- 
nology of head spines for the genus Helicolenus is the same as used by Matsubara 
(1943) and by Eschmeyer (1969). 

Abbreviations of depositories of specimens are as follows: ABE—personal 


VoL. XXXIX] ABE & ESCHMEYER: A NEW SCORPIONFISH 49 


collection of the senior author; BMNH—British Museum of Natural History; 
CAS—California Academy of Sciences; USNM—United States National Mu- 
seum; ZIUT—Zoological Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


The present writers take pleasure in expressing here their sincere thanks to 
Messrs. Hisateru Tsujisaki and Shoji Tamayama, Division of Offshore Fishing, 
Tokyo Branch, Tokusui Company, Ltd., Tokyo, for their cooperation with the sen- 
ior author during the past three years, and especially for providing the specimens 
used in the present study; and to Mr. Masa-ake Takeuchi for making the chemi- 
cal analysis of the flesh of one specimen of the new species. Comments on the 
manuscript were made by Dr. Lo-chai Chen and Mrs. Lillian Dempster. Mrs. 
Dempster also helped with literature work and the selection of the scientific 
name. Miss Pearl Sonoda aided in curatorial ways. 


Helicolenus avius Abe and Eschmeyer, new species. 
(Figures 1-2.) 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. All specimens were collected in the northwestern Pa- 
cific Ocean between Japan and Midway Island, at the southern end of Emperor 
Seamount Chain, between 32°40’N., 172°17’E., and 35°05S’N., 171°46’E., at a 
depth between 450 and 600 meters (probably most from 475 m.), with a bottom 
trawl, vessel Daini—Oriento Maru, around August 21-22, 1970. Holotype: ZIUT 
52457 (211 mm.S.L.). Paratypes: ABE 15256 (1, about 200 mm. T.L. [used for 
description of color in life only|); BMNH 1971 12.14.1 (1, 173 mm. S.L.); CAS 
13614 (2, 172-200 mm.S.L.) and CAS 13615 (1, 178 mm. S.L., cleared and 
stained) ; USNM 206327 (2, 176-181 mm. S.L.). 

DESCRIPTION. (Measurements and counts summarized in table 1; body shape 
and coloration in figures 1-2.) Dorsal fin with 12 spines and usually 13% (13’2- 
14%) soft rays. Anal fin with 3 spines and 6’ soft rays. Pectoral fin with 18-20 
rays, most frequently 19; 3rd through 11th or 12th rays branched in available 
specimens. Pelvic fin with 1 spine and 5 soft rays. Gill rakers total 31-34, 9 or 
10 on the upper arch and 2224 on the the lower arch, increasing in size toward 
angle of gill arch; longest raker about '2 of orbit diameter. Vertebrae 25. 
Airbladder absent. Head spines mostly rudimentary or absent; preorbital 
(lachrymal) bone with two weak spinous points over maxillary, sometimes vir- 
tually absent; five preopercular spines present, second longest, all broad; supple- 
mental preopercular spine absent; nasal spines present; opercular bone with two 
spines; preocular spine well developed; supraocular spine weak or absent; post- 
ocular and tympanic spines small, mostly covered by skin or developed as ridges 
only; upper posttemporal spine poorly developed or absent; supracleithral spine 
broad; nuchal spine sometimes present; other spines, including the parietal, sphen- 


50 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


TABLE 1. Counts and measurements for the type specimens of Helicolenus avius. 
(Measurements are in millimeters; see standard lengths in Material Examined section for 
depositories and catalog numbers.) 


Standard length 172 173 176 178 181 200 211 
Dorsal rays 12-+13% 124-13% 124-134% 12+-13%4 12-+413% 12 eeeeiae 
Anal rays 3+6% 346% 346% 346% 346% 346% 346% 
Pectoral rays 19, 19 19, 19 20, 20 20, 19 18, 18 19, 19 19,19 
Pelvic rays 1+5 1+5 1+5 1+5 1+5 1+5 1+5 
Vertebrae 25 25 

Gill rakers 10423 9424 9:44:22 9423 9-223) “iosepamemtoses 
Head length 61.5 58.7 65.7 62.5 64.2 73.4 76.7 
Body depth 48.8 49.1 53.4 50.3 50.7 56.9 57.4 
Orbit diameter 18.0 17.3 17.9 18.5 17.8 2233 22.0 
Snout length 15.6 13.6 16.0 14.7 16.4 16.8 17.9 
Interorbital width 9.2 9.1 9.5 9.2 10.8 11.9 1222 
Jaw length 30.0 29.6 28.3 30.1 30.8 34.7 3025 
Predorsal fin length 61.3 57.8 61.5 59.3 62.8 68.7 (Bis: 
Length 3rd dorsal spine 17.5 18.9 20.2 — — 22.8 PAL 
Length 1st anal spine 8.0 6.9 6.3 7.8 8.0 8.9 8.7 
Length 2nd anal spine 16.9 15.9 17.0 16.2 i7e5 tee 19.0 
Length 3rd anal spine 17.2 16.2 18.1 15.6 18.5 18.2 18.6 
Length pectoral fin 49.1 49.2 51.0 50.3 53.7 57.7 57.9 
Length pelvic fin 31.4 29.0 S10 28.7 Sil 33.0 Basil 
Length caudal fin 39.8 42.3 43.2 42.0 44.2 46.9 51.5 


otic, coronal, pterotic, lower posttemporal, and suborbital spine absent or present 
only as scarcely developed ridge. Scales on sides of body small, ctenoid; vertical 
scale rows from supracleithral spine to end of hypural about 100, difficult to 
count; pored lateral line scales about 50-55, plus 5 or more on the caudal fin; 
most of head with cycloid scales, including the maxillary, cheek, and interorbital 
area; snout unscaled; scales on belly, pectoral fin, and bases of vertical fins mostly 
cycloid. Premaxillary, dentary, vomer, and palatine toothed; longest teeth on 
the dentigerous knob of the premaxillary; all teeth short, conical, not arranged in 
definite rows. 

Color pattern of preserved specimens as in figures 1-2. Most conspicuous 
feature the dark spots above and below the lateral line anteriorly and on the 
back and dorsal fin. Buccal cavity black posteriorly, pallid anteriorly. Peri- 
toneum black. (Color in life, according to Mr. Tsujisaki, was unchanged when 
the frozen specimens were handed to the senior author. A color slide was made 
on 12 October, 1970, of one specimen (ABE cat. no. 15256) by the senior author 
soon after receipt of the specimens, and the following is taken from the slide. 
The coloration was also illustrated in Abe (1970) ). Body mostly red above 
and white ventrally. Dorsal surface of body and dorsal fin mottled with dark 
brown spots on a red background; spots arranged as in figure 1 of a preserved 
specimen. Pectoral and caudal fins red with yellowish tips. 


VoL. XXXIX] ABE & ESCHMEYER: A NEW SCORPIONFISH 51 


Ficure 1. Lateral view of Helicolenus avius, CAS 13614, paratype, 172 mm. in standard 
length. 


Name. The specific name avius is the Latin word for “‘out of the way, remote 
or solitary.”’ This name is in reference to the type locality, an isolated seamount. 
A Japanese name, ‘“‘okikasago,” meaning Scbastes-like or Helicolenus hilgendor fi- 
like fish, was given to this species (Abe, 1970). 

DIsTRIBUTION. This species is known only from the type locality. We expect 
that it might occur at other seamounts in the northwestern Pacific and partic- 
ularly along the Hawaiian Island chain. 

COMPARISON AND REMARKS. The subfamily Sebastinae has been defined by 
Matsubara (1943). Two of the four genera, Sebastes (including Sebastodes) 
and Sebastiscus, have an incomplete suborbital stay which does not attach to 
the preopercle. The other two genera of the subfamily, Helicolenus and Hozu- 
kius, have a complete suborbital stay. Species of Helicolenus lack an airbladder 
and have 25 vertebrae; while the single species of Hozukius has an airbladder 
and 26 vertebrae; the species show cranial differences also. 

At most there are five or six closely related known valid species or sub- 
species belonging to the genus Helicolenus. Helicolenus dactylopterus (Dela- 
roche, 1809) has a wide distribution in the Atlantic Ocean extending barely into 
the Indian Ocean in South Africa; synonyms include H. maculatus (Cuvier, 
1829), H. imperialis (Cuvier, 1829), H. maderensis Goode and Bean, 1896, 
H. thelmae Fowler, 1937, H. uruguayensis Fowler, 1943, and as a subspecies 
H. d. lahillei Norman, 1937 (see Eschmeyer, 1969). Helicolenus mouchezt 
(Sauvage, 1875) is a senior synonym of H. tristanensis Sivertsen, 1945, and is 
known from the south Atlantic at Tristan da Cunha and in the southern Indian 
Ocean at Saint Paul and Amsterdam islands (see Eschmeyer and Hureau, 


unr 
bo 


Ficure 2. Lateral and dorsal views of 
paratype, 172 mm. in standard length. 


the 


head of 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


Helicolenus 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


avius, 


CAS 13614, 


VoL. XXXIX] ABE & ESCHMEYVER: A NEW SCORPIONFISH 53 


1971). The nominal Oriental species is H. hilgendorfi (Steindachner and Déoder- 
lein, 1884), although this species has been treated as H. dactylopterus by some 
authors. Helicolenus lengerichi Norman, 1937, is known from the southeastern 
Pacific. The Australian-New Zealand species is H. papillosus (Schneider, 1801) 
with the following as synonyms, H. percoides (Richardson, 1842), H. cottoides 
(Forster, 1849), H. barathri (Hector, 1875) and H. maccullochi (Phillipps, 
1927) (see Whitley, 1968, p. 83). Helicolenus microphthalmus Norman, 1935, 
was shown to belong to the genus Sebastiscus (Wheeler and Eschmeyer, 1968), 
and H. rufescens Gilbert, 1905, from Hawaii belongs in the subfamily Scor- 
paeninae (Eschmeyer, 1969). Helicolenus avius agrees with these six species 
or subspecies in such features as counts of fin rays, general body shape, absence 
of an airbladder, condition of the suborbital stay, and 25 vertebrae. Helicolenus 
avius differs from the other species of Helicolenus in the following features. 
In H. avius the caudal fin is forked while the caudal fin in the others is “‘square- 
cut” or only slightly emarginate; the gill rakers are longer in H. avius; the 
tubed lateral-line scales number more than 50 in H. avius while they are fewer 
than 35 in the other species; the body scales are smaller in H. avius, about 100 
vertical scale rows versus 80 or fewer; H. avius shows reduced spination, with 
some spines which are normally found in the other species either poorly devel- 
oped in H. avius, present as slight ridges, or absent; and H. avius, has the pro- 
tuberance or dentigerous knob at the end of each premaxillary bone much better 
developed. 


LITERATURE CITED 


ABE, TOKIHARU 

1970. Shingao no sakana, 1970 nen ban [New faces of fishes, edition for the year 1970]. 
Publications of the Shigezo Ito Institute of Ichthyology, Tokyo. 1970, no. 2, 
8 pp. (In Japanese). 

ESCHMEYER, WILLIAM N. 

1969. A systematic review of the scorpionfishes of the Atlantic Ocean (Pisces: 
Scorpaenidae). Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, 
no. 79, 130 pp., 13 figs. 

EscHMEYER, WILLIAM N., and JEAN CLAUDE HUREAU 

1971. Sebastes mouchezi, a senior synonym of Helicolenus tristanensis, with comments 
on Sebastes capensis and zoogeographical considerations. Copeia, 1971, no. 3, 
pp. 576-579. 

MartsusBara, KiyoMATsuU 

1943. Studies on the scorpaenoid fishes of Japan. The Transactions of the Sigen- 

kagaku Kenkyusyo, no. 1, 486 pp., 4 pls. 
WHEELER, ALWYNE, and WILLIAM N. ESCHMEYER 

1968. The identity of the “British” scorpionfish Helicolenus microphthalmus. Jour- 

nal of the Linnean Society (Zoology), vol. 47 (no. 312), pp. 309-314, 1 fig. 
WHITLEY, GILBERT P. 

1968. A check-list of the fishes recorded from the New Zealand region. The Australian 

Zoologist, vol. 15, part 1, pp. 1-102. 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XX XIX, No. 5, pp. 55-64; 1 fig.; 1 table. April 6, 1972 


TWO NEW SCORPIONFISHES (GENUS 
SCORPAENODES) FROM THE INDO-WEST 
PACIFIC, WITH COMMENTS ON 
SCORPAENODES MUCIPARUS (ALCOCK) 


By 


William N. Eschmeyer 


California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118 
and 


K. V. Rama Rao 
Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta-16, India 


ABSTRACT: Two new scorpionfishes of the genus Scorpaenodes are described from 
the Indian Ocean. Additional comments are given on Scorpaenodes muciparus (Al- 
cock). These three species are compared with each other and with S. tribulosus 
Eschmeyer, the fourth species of the genus Scorpaenodes known from offshore areas 
in the Indo-West Pacific. 


INTRODUCTION 


Eschmeyer (1969a) identified Indian Ocean specimens collected by the 
United States International Indian Ocean Expedition as Scorpaenodes muciparus 
(Alcock, 1889), offering a description and figures. Recently, we had the oppor- 
tunity to examine two specimens of S. muciparus in the collection of the Zoological 
Survey of India, and one of us (W.N.E.) was also able to examine the specimen 
collected by the Siboga which was identified as S. muciparus by Weber (1913) 
and also by de Beaufort (Weber and de Beaufort, 1962). It was then apparent 
that the specimens identified by Eschmeyer (1969a) as S. muciparus were not 
specimens of that species but represented a new species, a species which one of 
us (K.V.R.R.) was in the process of describing as part of current studies on the 


Marine Biological Laboratory 
LIBRA Pv 


APR141972 


\VAlan nt | aT ee ee a { 


[55] 


56 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


scorpionfishes of India. Examination of scorpionfishes in other museums has 
resulted in location of yet another closely related species, the description of which 
we include in this paper. These three species, along with S. tribulosus (Esch- 
meyer, 1969a), live in offshore level-bottom areas, while other members of the 
genus are shallow-water rock or reef inhabitants. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


The senior author acknowledges the support of National Science Foundation 
Grant GB-15811, which permitted him to examine scorpionfishes in most of the 
major fish collections. The following museums contained specimens used in this 
study, and we wish to thank the curators and staffs listed for courtesies extended 
during his visits to their museums: BMNH, British Museum of Natural History 
(N. B. Marshall, G. Palmer, A. Wheeler, P. Whitehead) ; CAS, California Academy 
of Sciences (L. Dempster, P. Sonoda); NMS, National Museum of Singapore 
(E. Alfred); USNM, United States National Museum (N. Gamblin, V. 
Springer); ZMA, Zoological Museum, Amsterdam (H. Nijssen); ZMC, Zoologi- 
cal Museum, Copenhagen (J. Nielsen) ; ZSI, Zoological Survey of India (A. G. K. 
Menon). 

Lillian Dempster, Pearl Sonoda, Kathy Smith, Terry Arambula, and Maurice 
Giles of the California Academy of Sciences, assisted in the study. We are grate- 
ful for comments on the manuscript made by Lillian Dempster and A. G. K. 
Menon. 


METHODS 


Counts, measurements, and terminology of head spines are as used by Esch- 
meyer (1969b, pp. 4-6). 


SPECIES ACCOUNTS 


The limits of the genus Scorpaenodes have been discussed recently (Esch- 
meyer, 1969a). Within the subfamily Scorpaeninae, the genus is characterized 
by the following combination of characters: normally thirteen dorsal spines, 
spinous procurrent caudal fin rays, and no palatine teeth. The genus contains 
species which are primarily tropical, shallow-water forms, and species of the genus 
are found in all warm oceans. 

The four species of Scorpaenodes treated in the present paper are the only 
ones of the genus occurring in offshore Indo-Pacific waters below a depth of about 
20 fathoms. These four species may be separated as follows: 


1. Vertical scale rows (above lateral line from first lateral line scale to end of hypural) 
OMOT oI) O1 CG ae ee 2 nee oe ee Se S. muciparus 
1. “Vertical ‘scale rows about 50 or fewer 2.20 Eee 2 


2. Soft dorsal rays 8%, scales strongly ctenoid with long ctenii, underside of head covered 
with ctenoid scales —___ ES GV ANE en Ye ee S. tribulosus 


Vor. XXXIX ESCHMEYVER & RAO: TWO NEW SCORPIONFISHES 57 


2. Soft dorsal rays usually 914, scales ctenoid, underside of head naked or with cycloid 
SOPUBS en eed EE Se ee ee ae Se ee en ee a 3 


Remarks. A new species, Scorpaenodes steinitzi, was described recently by 
Klausewitz and Frgiland (1970) from the Red Sea. Seventy-five additional speci- 
mens of this species are available to us. Two of the major differentiating char- 
acters used by these authors were that the dorsal and anal soft ray counts were 1 
higher in S. steimitzi than in the other species, but this results from the fact that 
Klausewitz and Fr¢iland counted the last double ray as 2 rays, while recent 
authors count this as 1 or 1'2 rays. Despite this, Scorpaenodes steinitzi appears 
to be a valid species which is distinguishable from other species most easily by its 
coloration. We mention this because readers may wonder if S. steinitzi might not 
be one of the species treated here by us. Scorpaenodes steinitzi is a pale-colored 
species with some brown pigment on the sides and it usually has a dark spot near 
the posterior end of the spinous dorsal fin, but S. steinitzi does not have the 
lateralis canal head pores well developed and it is a shallow-living species. In 
S. steinitzi the spots on the caudal fin when present are arranged in rows while 
they are more scattered in S. smithi; and the dark pigment on the sides in S. 
steinitzi is not arranged in definite bars as in S. smithi, S. investigatoris, and S. 
muciparus. 


Scorpaenodes investigatoris Eschmeyer and Rama Rao, new species. 


Scorpaenodes muciparus, ESCHMEYER, 1969a, pp. 4-8, figs. la, b, table 1 (description; these 
specimens now referred to this new species, not S. muciparus (Alcock, 1889). 

Scorpaenodes varipinnis, SMiTH, 1957, p. 65 (in part; only the 50 mm. specimen taken from 
the stomach of a specimen of Pristipomoides microlepis Bleeker collected in 110 fathoms 
off Memba and tentatively referred to S. varipinnis). 


REMARKS. The specimens wrongly identified by Eschmeyer (1969a) as 
S. muciparus (Alcock) are designated as the types of this new species along with 
two specimens from the collection of the Zoological Survey of India. The holo- 
type (CAS 24264) and one paratype (CAS 24265) were figured by Eschmeyer 
(1969a, fig. la, b). 

TYPE MATERIAL. Holotype. CAS 24264 (1, 71.2 mm. S.L.), West Pakistan, 
24°13’ N., 65°52’ E., in 93 fathoms, Anton Bruun Cruise 4B, station 267B, 9 
December 1963. 

Paratypes. CAS 24266 (1, 87.4 mm. S.L.), West Pakistan, 25°02’ N., 
56°52’ E., in 159 fathoms, Anton Bruun Cruise 4B, station 264A, 2 December 
1963; CAS 24265 (2, 45.8-48.9 mm. S.L.), off western India, 22°32’ N., 68°07’ 


58 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


E., in 31.5 fathoms, Anton Bruun Cruise 4B, station 221A, 18 November 1963; 
USNM 204030 (1, 72.4 mm. S.L.), off western India, 17°25’ N., 71°39’ E., in 
52.5 fathoms, Anton Bruun Cruise 4B, station 202A, 13 November 1963; ZSI 
916/1 (1, 86 mm. S.L.) and ZSI 917/1 (1, 67 mm. S.L.), Arabian Sea, off Rat- 
nagiri Coast, 17°27’ N., 71°41’ E., 56-58 fathoms, bottom of fine sand, Agassiz 
trawl haul, /nvestigator station 242, 11 October 1898. (Smith’s specimen men- 
tioned above in the Synonymy is regarded only as an additional specimen and 
not a type.) 

DeEscrIPTION. See Eschmeyer (1969a, pp. 4-8, figs. la and 1b, table 1) for 
a complete description of this species. The two ZSI specimens have the following 
counts: Dorsal rays XIII, 9% anal rays III, 5’2-6'2; pectoral rays 19. The 
vertical scale rows in the two specimens number 45-48, and the gill rakers num- 
ber 5—6 plus 12-13. Except for the specimen with 6’ soft anal rays, the counts 
fall within those given by Eschmeyer (1969a, table 1). 

DISTRIBUTION. Scorpaenodes investigatoris is known from the Gulf of Oman 
and in the Arabian Sea off western India and West Pakistan. The specimen re- 
ported by Smith (1957, p. 65) was taken off Memba, Mozambique. Depths of 
capture range from 31 to 159 fathoms. 

CoMPARISONS. This species very closely resembles Scorpaenodes smithi in 
scalation, counts, and coloration. Scorpaenodes investigatoris and S. smithi may 
be easily separated from the other two offshore species of Scorpaenodes: S. 
muciparus has over 70 vertical scale rows as opposed to about 50 in S. investigatoris 
and S. smithi, and S. tribulosus has strongly ctenoid scales on the underside of the 
head while the other species have the underside of the head mostly naked or with 
cycloid scales. The descriptions of S. investigatoris and S. smithi are almost 
identical. The two characters which may be used to separate them are 
pectoral rays and the coloration of the rear of the buccal cavity. In S. 
investigatoris the pectoral rays are usually 19 (18-20) while they usually 
number 17 or 18 (16-19) in S. smithi. In S. investigatoris the rear of the mouth, 
including the pharyngeal bones and the areas adjacent to them, is dusky in color- 
ation while this area is pallid in S. smithi. No other clear-cut differences were 
noted. Scorpaenodes investigatoris appears to live at deeper depths than S. smith. 

Etymo.Locy. The name is based on the Royal Marine Survey Steamer 
Investigator, which made important collections in the Indian Seas during the years 
1884-1926; the name “‘investigatoris” was used by one of us (K.V.R.R.) for this 
species in his unpublished thesis on Indian Ocean scorpionfishes. 


Scorpaenodes muciparus (Alcock). 


Sebastes muciparus ALCOCK, 1889, pp. 298-299, fig. 3 on pl. 22 (original description; type 
locality Bay of Bengal, 26 miles N. by E. of Gopalpur, in 45 fathoms). Atcock, 1898, 


pl. 18, fig. 5 (good illustration). WerBER, 1913, p. 491 (brief description; one from 
Siboga station 306, Solor Straits, 8°27’S., 122°54’W., in 247 meters). 


Vor. XXXIX ESCHMEYER & RAO: TWO NEW SCORPIONFISHES 59 


Scorpaenodes muciparus, de Beaufort in WEBER and DE BEAUFORT, 1962, pp. 34-35 (redescrip- 
tion of Siboga specimen described by Weber). 


MATERIAL EXAMINED. ZSI 1179/1 (1, 80 mm. S.L.) Gulf of Martaban, 
14°46/N., 95°52’E., in 61 fathoms, on soft, green muddy and sandy bottom, 
Agassiz trawl haul, /nvestigator station 328, 7 March 1904; ZSI 12432 (1, 73 mm. 
S.L.) Bay of Bengal, Ganjam coast, 19°24’N., 85°E., in 23 fathoms, muddy 
bottom, Blake trawl haul, /nvestigator station 42, 7 March 1889; ZMA 110.246 
(1, 146 mm. S.L.) Indonesia, Solor Straits, 8°27’S., 122°54’E., in 135 fathoms, 
Siboga station 306, 8 Feb. 1900. 

REMARKS. The reader is referred to the references listed above for a more 
complete description of this species. The holotype of this species, which was 
originally in the ZSI collection, has been lost. If a neotype is ever needed, we 
suggest that the specimen listed above from /nvestigator station 42 (ZSI 12432) 
would make the best neotype, as it is from the same general locality as the type 
and was identified as S. muciparus by Alcock. Scorpaenodes muciparus is charac- 
terized by a dorsal ray count of 13 spines and 9’ soft rays, pectoral rays of 18-19, 
and vertical scale rows of over 70. The other three species treated in this paper 
have a scale count of 50 or fewer. De Beaufort (in Weber and de Beaufort, 1962, 
p. 35) gives a scale count of 45—58 for the Siboga specimen. Re-examination shows 
that the specimen has a vertical scale row count of about 70-73 when the scale 
rows are counted above the lateral line from the supracleithral spine to the end of 
the hypural plate. 


Scorpaenodes tribulosus Eschmeyer. 


Scorpaenodes tribulosus ESCHMEYER, 1969a, pp. 8-10, fig. 1c, table 1 (original description; 
type locality East Africa, off Kenya, 02°42’S., 40°53’E., in 77 fathoms and off the 
Somali Republic, 11°24’N., 51°35’E., in 40-96 fathoms). 


REMARKS. The species is still known only from the western Indian Ocean, 
from the holotype (CAS 24267, off Kenya) and one paratype (USNM 204031, 
off the Somali Republic) as given above. The reader is referred to Eschmeyer 
(1969a) for a description of this species. This species is characterized by a dorsal 
ray count of 13 spines and 8% soft rays, pectoral rays 19, and vertical scale rows 
under 50. Scorpaenodes tribulosus is most easily distinguished from the other 
species by the presence of strongly ctenoid scales on the underside of the head; 
the other three species have this area covered with cycloid scales or mostly naked. 


Scorpaenodes smithi Eschmeyer and Rama Rao, new species. 
(Figure 1.) 

TYPE MATERIAL. Holotvpe. BMNH 1929.6.12.6 (52.2 mm. S.L.), Andaman 
Sea, off western Malaya, 5°45’N., 98°20’E., in 40 fathoms, Madras- Penang Cable 
Survey, Cable ship Patrol, 16 March 1929. 


[Proc. 4TH Serr. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


60 


‘Bag uvUepUY ay} Woy “T'S “WU 7°75 “9°71°9'6761 HNN ‘edAjoj04 


‘satads Mau ‘ory ePWUIeY puR JaAIWIYISY 2y472WUWsS Sapouangs0I¢ 


‘T qunorg 


Vor. XXXIX ESCHMEYVER & RAO: TWO NEW SCORPIONFISHES 61 


Paratypes. BMNH1929.6.12.7-15 (12, 21.5-47.0 mm. S.L.), and CAS 13616 
(4, 23.2-52.1 mm. S.L.) and ZSI F6254/2 (1, 46.0 mm. S.L.), formerly in BMNH 
1929.6.12.6—-15, taken with the holotype; BMNH 1932.2.15.15-20 (6, 24.5-48.3 
mm. S.L.), Andaman Sea, west of Malaya, 6°01’20’N., 99°03’05”E., in 46 
fathoms, mud bottom, Madras-Penang Cable Survey, no date; BMNH 
1972.1.17.1-9 (9, 22.0-51.3 mm. S.L.) and USNM 206501 (4, 22.4—45.6 
mm. S.L.) west of Malaya, 80 miles south of Penang, in 24 fathoms, en- 
tangled in coelenterates found on cable, cable ship Patrol, May 1923; BMNH 
orot.4 (1, 35.6 mm. S.L.), Arafura Sea, 11°59’30’S., 126°38’E., in 
60 fathoms, E. and A. Telegraph Company, collected in or before 1933; 
Mie P7982—-83 (2, 56.5 mm. S.L.), Gulf of Tonkin, 20°26’N., 108°09’E., 
in 28 fathoms, collected by Schgnau in or before 1895; ZMC P7978-81 
(4, 46.2-60.8 mm. S.L.), China Seas, collected by FE. Svenson, in or 
before 1893; ZMC P79100-112 (13, 34.0-62.4 mm. S.L.), southwest of Hong 
Kong, 26°10’N., 121°00’E., in 44 fathoms, collected by H. Christiansen, 31 May 
1912; ZMC P79113-132 (20, 28.7-46.8 mm. S.L.), off western Malaya, 
5°09’08’”N., 99°48’10”E., in 32 fathoms, sandy mud bottom, collected by Store 
Nordiske, 24 Dec. 1935; ZMC P7991-92 (2, 32.1-58.8 mm. S.L.), Formosa 
Strait, ““Namoa” Island, collected by Capt. Svenson, in or before 1912; NMS 
uncataloged (10, 15.5-54.4 mm. S.L.), near Singapore 5°59’06”N., 99°08’33”E., 
in 40 fathoms, collected by Tweedie. A total of 89 specimens. 

DEscriPTION. Measurements and counts summarized in table 1; body shape 
and coloration in figure 1. 

Dorsal fin rays normally XIII, 9'%, rarely 8’ or 10’. Anal fin rays normally 
III, 5%. Pectoral rays usually 17 or 18 (16-19), rays 2 or 3 through 7 to 9 
branched in larger specimens; smaller specimens with fewer branched rays; the 
branching of pectoral rays begins at about 25-30 mm. S.L. Spines on head 
well developed. Preorbital bone with second and third lobes (Matsubara’s, 1943, 
terminology) each as a broad spinous point extending over the maxillary, third 
lobe usually with additional spinous points; suborbital ridge with one row of 
spinous points, usually one and sometimes several spines on the lateral face of the 
preorbital bone in line with three or more spinous points on the suborbital bones, 
the posterior one frequently double. Tympanic spines present; coronal spines 
usually absent, sometimes present only on one side, rarely present on both sides. 
Interorbital ridges rarely ending in spines. Small spines (postfrontal spines of 
Smith, 1957) near midline between tympanic spines sometimes present. Supple- 
mental preopercular spine present. First preopercular spine long, second usually 
small, third present, fourth usually present, points ventrally, and fifth points 
down (sometimes virtually absent). Preocular, supraocular, and postocular 
spines well developed. Small spine below parietal spine usually absent. Other 
spines present include the nasal, parietal, nuchal, sphenotic, pterotic, upper (some- 


62 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH Ser. 
TABLE 1. Counts’ and measurements of type specimens of Scorpaenodes smithi. 
(Measurements are in millimeters; numbers in parentheses are percentages of standard length.) 

BMNH 
1929.6.12.6 CAS 13616 P7982-3 

Standard 

length Sf S2el 48.7 44.2 23.2 56.5 56.5 
Dorsal fin 

rays + XIII+8% XIII+9% XIII+9'4 XII+9% XIII+9% XIII+9% XIII+8% 
Anal fin 

rays ! TI+5% Wi+5% WI+5% IWI+5% IiI+5% I+6% Ii+5% 
Pectoral fin 

rays ! Vaats 1st; isseis | 1ssise es-ES 18-P1g) sels-oe 
Head length 22.6(43 ) 23.3(45) 21.2(44) 19.1(43) 10.7(46) 24.3(43)  22.0(39) 
Snout length 6.1(12) 6.5(12) 6.2(13) SAID) BAU) 6.5(12) 6.2(11) 
Orbit diameter 6.8(13) 6.8(13) 6.7(14) 5.9(13) 3.2(14) 6.2(11) 6.7(12) 
Interorbital 

width 3.3(06) 3.0(06) 2.8(06) 2.9(06) 1.7(07) 3.8(07) 3.2(06) 
Upper jaw 

length 11.9(23) 1320 C25) leo (24) O)7(22)) Sash(7S))) 12°42) 122222) 
Predorsal-fin 

length 20.7(40) 21.4(41) 20.0(41) 18.3(41) 10.3(44) 21.0(37)  20.4(36) 
Body depth 2222)\(43)) 21.5(41) 19.6(40) 17.0(38) 9.9(43) 22.7(40)  22.0(39) 
Pectoral fin 

length 17 (SS) 19.1(37) 16.5(34) 15.8(36) 7.4(32) 19.2(34) 21.5(38) 
Pelvic fin 

length 13.9(27) 135/(26)) 12:6 (26) 112526) 5.7(24) 14.2(25) 14.8(26) 
Caudal fin 

length 14.8(28) TAPAS) elo O28) aeliZesiC2.8)) 7.0(30) 14.8(26)  15.3(27) 

ZSI F6254/2 BMNH 1932.2.15.15-20 

Standard length 46.0 48.3 46.6 48.1 47.8 32.2 24.5 
Dorsal fin 

rays XIII+9'% XII+10% XIII+9'4 XIII+9% XII+9% XIII-+9% XIII-+9% 
Anal fin rays I+5% Wl-+5% I1-+5% I1+5% 145% II+5% IiI+5% 
Pectoral fin 

rays 17+18 17-+-17 18+18 17+17 17+17 18+18 18+18 
Head length 19.8(43) 21.5(44) 20.3(44) 19.8(41) 19.7(41) 14.2(44) 11.4(46) 
Snout length 5.2(11) 5.7(12). 5.2011) 5,5(11) .S4(11). 4eCie ieee 


VoL. XXXIX ESCHMEYER & RAO: TWO NEW SCORPIONFISHES 63 


(Table 1 Continued) 


ZSI F6254/2 BMNH 1932.2.15.15-20 


Orbit diameter 5.7(12) 6.0(12) fl) 5.9(12) 6.0(12) 4.1(13) 3.6(15) 


Interorbital 

width 2.7(06) 3.2(07) 2.8( 06) 3.0(06) 3.2(07) 2.2(07) 1.8(07) 
Upper jaw 

length 10.0(22) PROCS) V1OSC2) 10422) e022) 7.5(23) 6.2(25) 
Predorsal fin 

length 18.8(41) 19.1(40) 18.6(40) 19.4(40) 19.0(40) 14.2(44) 11.2(46) 
Body depth 19.0(41) 18.8(39)  18.8(40) 19.8(41) 20.0(42) 13.2(41) 10.6(43) 
Pectoral fin 

length 14.6(32) 14.5(30) 14.4(31) 14.0(29) 14.4(30) 9.0( 28) 7.7(31) 
Pelvic fin 

length 12.2(26) IO AS) SAAT) UAE@aD) aC) 8.0(25) 7.0(28) 
Caudal fin 

length 13.0(28) 124 (26) 2.827) 12292) 126 (26) 8.6(27) 7.1(29) 


1 Counts of 63 additional specimens give the following totals (12 small specimens not counted): Dorsal fin 
rays XIII+916(70 specimens), XIII+814(2), XIII+9(1), XII+1014(1), XIII+1014(2), and XIII4+-5%(1, 
abnormal); Anal fin rays III+514(75 specimens), III+614(1), I4614(1, abnormal); Pectoral fin rays 
16+17(1 specimen), 17+17(22), 17+18(6), 18+17(7), 184+18(37), 184+19(1), 19+18(2), 19+19(1). 


times absent) and lower posttemporal, two opercular, cleithral, and supracleithral 
(double). Fourth suborbital bone isolated, bearing a few small spines (Gins- 
burg’s, 1953, postorbital spines). Tentacles and other fleshy appendages associ- 
ated with most head spines. Supraocular tentacle about % to ' of orbit diameter, 
sometimes reduced, with branches distally. A few tabs on upper part of eye, 
two usually larger than the others. Scales on flanks ctenoid; vertical scale rows 
about 40 to 50, usually in middle forties; lateral-line scales usually 23 plus 1 or 
2 on caudal fin. Bases of fins with a few scales. Scales on chest and pectoral 
fin base mostly cycloid. Dorsal parts of head scaled; underside of head unscaled 
or with cycloid scales; snout unscaled. Gill rakers including rudiments 15-17; 
upper arch with 5—6 short spiny rakers; lower arch with 9-10 rakers on cerato- 
branchial and usually 2 rudiments on hypobranchial. Small slit present behind 
fourth gill arch. Head pores well developed. Color pattern as in figure 1. Most 
conspicuous feature is the black spot on the posterior part of the spinous dorsal 
fin. Body usually with four broad bands, first under anterior dorsal spines, second 
under posterior spinous dorsal fin, third between soft dorsal fin and anal fin, 
fourth at base of caudal fin. All fins with brown or black spots. Three brown bars 
radiating from eye; first extends forward across preorbital bone, second below 
eye, and third extends down and back from posterior ventral part of eye. 
DISTRIBUTION. Scorpaenodes smithi seems to be widespread in the area of 


64 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 47H Serr. 


the South China Sea and through the Straits of Malacca into the Andaman Sea. 
A wider distribution in the Indo-Australian Archipelago is expected. Depths 
of capture range from 24 to 60 fathoms, and the bottom type appears to be mud 


or sand. 

COMPARISONS. See the Comparisons section under the account of Scorpaenodes 
investigatoris. 

EtyMoLocy. We name this species in honor of the late Professor J. L. B. 
Smith for his noteworthy contributions to the knowledge of Indian Ocean scor- 
pionfishes. 


LITERATURE CITED 


Atcock, ALFRED 
1889. Natural history notes from H. M.’s Indian Marine surveying steamer /nvesti- 
gator, Commander Alfred Carpenter, R.N., D.S.O., commanding. No. 12. 
Descriptions of some new and rare species of fishes from the Bay of Bengal, 
obtained during the season of 1888-89. Journal of the Asiatic Society of 
Bengal, vol. 58 (pt. 2, no. 17), pp. 296-305, pl. 22. 
1898. Illustrations of the zoology of the Royal Indian marine surveying steamer 
Investigator, . . . Fishes—part 5. Calcutta, pls. 18-24. 
ESCHMEYER, WILLIAM N. 
1969a. A new scorpionfish of the genus Scorpaenodes and S. muciparus (Alcock) from 
the Indian Ocean, with comments on the limits of the genus. Occasional Papers 
of the California Academy of Sciences, no. 76, 11 pp., 1 table, 1 fig. 
1969b. A systematic review of the scorpionfishes of the Atlantic Ocean (Pisces: Scor- 
paenidae). Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, no. 79, 
130 pp., 13 figs., 15 tables. 
GInsBurG, ISAAC 
1953. Western Atlantic scorpionfishes. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, vol. 121, 
no. 8, 103 pp., 6 text figs. 
KLAUSEWITz, WOLFGANG, and @ysTEIN FROILAND 
1970. Scorpaenodes steinitzi n. sp. von Eilat, Golf von Aqaba. Senkenbergiana 
Biologica, vol. 51, no. 5/6, pp. 317-321, 2 figs. 
MATSUBARA, KrvYOMATSU 
1943. Studies on the scorpaenoid fishes of Japan. The Transactions of the Sigenkagaku 
Kenkyusyo, no. 1, 486 pp., 4 pls. 
SMiTH, J. L. B. 
1957. The fishes of the family Scorpaenidae in the western Indian Ocean. Part 1. 
The subfamily Scorpaeninae. Ichthyological Bulletin, Rhodes University, no. 4, 
pp. 49-69, pls. 1-4. 
WEBER, MAx 
1913. Die fische der Siboga-Expedition, Siboga Expedition, vol. 57, 710 pp., pls. 1-12, 
text figs. 1-123. 
WEBER, Max, and L. F. pE BEAUFORT. 
1962. The fishes of the Indo-Australian Archipelago, XI. Scleroparei, Hypostomides, 
Pediculati, Plectognathi, Opisthomi, Discocephali, Xenopterygii. E. J. Brill, 
Leiden, 481 pp., 100 text figs. 


ee eee wee peer 
Marine Blological Laborate 


“se tote 


PROCEEDINGS | Wocds Hole, Mass. 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 6, pp. 65-74, 22 figs. September 5, 1972 


NEW BARNACLE RECORDS (CIRRIPEDIA, 
THORACICA) 
By 


Victor A. Zullo, Dea B. Beach, and James T. Carlton 
California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118 


Balanus amphitrite amphitrite Darwin, 1854. 
(Figures 1-4.) 


In discussing the introduction of Balanus improvisus Darwin to the Pacific 
Coast of North America, Carlton and Zullo (1969) noted that although this 
species was relatively common in collections dating back to 1853, no specimens 
of B. amphitrite amphitrite were found in collections made prior to 1939, when 
it was first observed by F. L. Rogers in San Francisco Bay (Henry, 1942). The 
establishment of B. improvisus on the Pacific Coast appears to be tied to the 
commercial importation of the North American East Coast oyster, Crassostrea 
virginica (Gmelin). Both barnacles are frequent epizooites of this oyster, but 
as B. amphitrite amphitrite is a relatively recent addition to the fauna of the 
East Coast as well, Carlton and Zullo concluded that its absence in early 
Pacific Coast collections reflected a similar absence on the East Coast. How- 
ever, further inquiry into the history of the Pacific Coast oyster industry has 
revealed that all importations of Crassostrea virginica were from areas north 
of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (the northern range limit of B. amphitrite 
amphitrite), thus virtually eliminating this oyster as a vehicle of introduction 
for B. amphitrite amphitrite. 

While processing miscellaneous collections of barnacles for the Academy of 
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP), two lots of B. amphitrite amphitrite 
were found that had been obtained from the California coast prior to 1939. This 
material, collected by Charles R. Orcutt and originally identified by Henry A. 
Pilsbry, consists of four specimens with opercular valves from La Jolla, Cali- 
fornia, and of a single, large (20 millimeter basal diameter) specimen from San 
Diego Bay, California. Both lots bear the number “158/428”, but no date of 


[65] 


66 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficures 1-4. Balanus amphitrite amphitrite Darwin. Figure 1, scutum, height 4 mm.; 


figure 2, shell, greatest diameter 20 mm.; figures 3-4, terga, height 4 mm. (Figures 1, 3, 
4, La Jolla, California; figure 2, San Diego Bay, California). Ficures 5-6. Opercular 
valves of Balanus improvisus Darwin, CAS locality 41227, Delta Mendota Canal, California, 


height of scutum and tergum 3.8 mm. 


collection. Dr. Robert Robertson and Nancy Rulen of the Philadelphia 
Academy were kind enough to search their records, and were able to provide 
the following data: 
ANSP no. 2257. La Jolla, California, C. R. Orcutt collector, donated 
by the U. S. National Museum and cataloged December 6, 1921. 
ANSP no. 2426. San Diego, California, C. R. Orcutt collector, De- 
cember 9, 1927. 

The apparent establishment of B. amphitrite amphitrite in southern Cali- 
fornia by at least the early 1920’s and in the late 1930’s in northern California 
is likely attributable to transport by ships. Its occurrence may eventually be 
placed considerably earlier than this, for it had already arrived in Hawaii by 
the early 1900’s (Pilsbry, 1907, p. 190). Balanus amphitrite amphitrite is 
restricted to certain estuarine parts of the San Francisco Bay complex where 
mean annual temperatures are highest, but even in these areas Newman (1967) 
has noted that the temperature regime is clearly suboptimal for this subspecies. 
If the establishment of B. amphitrite amphitrite in San Francisco Bay was 


VoL. XXXIX] ZULLO, BEACH, & CARLTON: BARNACLE RECORDS 67 


indeed later than in southern California, the delay may be explained by the 
paucity of suitable environments for successful colonization. 


Balanus eburneus Gould, 1841. 
(Figures 8-15.) 


Balanus eburneus, whose natural range includes the Atlantic coasts of North 
America and northern South America, the Caribbean Sea, and the Gulf of 
Mexico, has been introduced by shipping to various parts of the world. Known 
introductions, emphasizing those in the Pacific Ocean, were summarized by 
Matsui e¢ al. (1964) and Utinomi (1966). Definite Pacific localities include 
Balboa, in the Bay of Panama, eastern Pacific, the Hawaiian Islands, and the 
Japan Sea coast of central Japan. Weltner (1897) reported B. eburneus on 
Fasciolaria with B. amphitrite from Manila in the Philippines, but this identi- 
fication has not been corroborated. 

A sample in the collection of the Department of Invertebrate Zoology of the 
California Academy of Sciences (CAS) taken by Mr. Vern Brock in July, 1967, 
from between Ansala and Vera islands in Eniwetok Atoll in the Marshall Islands 
was found to contain several individuals of B. eburneus in association with B. 
amphitrite amphitrite. These specimens represent the first record of B. eburneus 
from islands of the central West Pacific, and no doubt reflect the heavy traffic 
in American shipping to that area since the Second World War. The occurrence 
of this Atlantic American species at Eniwetok suggests that other highly 
frequented ports in the central Pacific islands might also harbor successfully 
introduced populations of B. eburneus. 

This species was also discovered recently at another, albeit more likely, 
locality in the western Atlantic. Mrs. Joleen Gordon, in the course of an 
ecologic study of Bermuda barnacles during the summer of 1967, found B. 
eburneus to be a common member of that fauna in association with B. amphitrite 
amphitrite and Chthamalus stellatus thompsoni Henry. 

The barnacle fauna of the Bermudas was investigated most recently by 
Henry (1958) on the basis of collections made by T. A. and Anne Stephenson 
in the early 1950’s. Balanus amphitrite hawaiiensis Broch (= B. amphitrite 
amphitrite) and Chthamalus stellatus thompsoni were reported there for the 
first time, but Balanus eburneus was not found. Judging from the abundance 
of B. eburneus and its association with the above-mentioned subspecies as seen 
in 1967, it is possible that this species has been introduced to the Bermuda 
fauna since the date of the Stephensons’ survey. 


Balanus improvisus Darwin, 1854. 
(Figures 5-7.) 

A living population of B. improvisus was discovered in December, 1962, on 
the concrete lining of a section of the Delta-Mendota fresh water irrigation 


68 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ss 
& 
° 
= 
. 
S 
& 
—_ 
(D ‘. 
Se , 
Antioch ~ 
Z 
e 
Oe*s 
o OES 
> Rae oO 
Z. ee e e w 
= . 3 
. © # 
e iJ 
a—\ ea a 
4 8 - Tracy =) 
oO 4 *e, e 
S % fe. 
os His tee 2 
9 Oe, 
cos) 
ve Cy ‘. 
N 4 OF 
Ore 
e 
e 
0 10 Miles *e 
== e 


Ficure 7. Relationship of Delta-Mendota Canal system to the San Francisco Bay- 


Delta area. Numbers indicate Tracy Pumping Plant (1) and collection site of Balanus 
improvisus (2). 


canal in central California. The barnacles, collected by G Dallas Hanna and 
Allyn G. Smith of the California Academy of Sciences (CAS locality 41227), 
were taken at mile post 20.62, or more than 20 miles downstream from the 
Tracy Pumping Plant, which is about 9 miles northwest of Tracy, San Joaquin 
County, California (figure 7). This section of the canal was discussed previously 
by Hanna (1966, p. 40, figs. 30-31) with respect to the phenomenal infestation 
of the Asiatic fresh water clam Corbicula manilensis (Philippi). The occurrence 
of barnacles in the canal was noted by Prokopovich (1968, p. 53, photo- 
graph 48). 

Irrigation water is pumped into the Delta-Mendota Canal by the Tracy 
Plant via a 2.3-mile-long canal from the Old River Channel of the San Joaquin 
River. This intake is well over 25 miles from the established salt water barrier 
of the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary in the vicinity of Antioch, California. 


Vor. XXXIX] ZULLO, BEACH, & CARLTON: BARNACLE RECORDS 69 


Continuing water quality analyses made at the pumping plant indicate that 
total dissolved solids do not exceed 500 parts per million (0.5 parts per 
thousand) at the canal intake. 

Although a few species of barnacles are known to live in river estuaries 
where salinities are negligible for most of the year, there has been only one 
other report of an apparent occurrence in totally fresh water (Shatoury, 1958; 
B. amphitrite in a cement irrigation holding tank 64 kilometers south of the 
mouth of the Nile Delta). On the basis of observational and experimental data, 
it has been assumed that euryhaline barnacles, such as B. improvisus and B. 
eburneus, can exist in fresh water as adults provided that higher salinities 
prevail in the area during larval spawning and settlement. These outlying 
populations are apparently unable to reproduce, and must rely, therefore, on 
larval recruitment from breeding populations in higher salinities downstream. 
The larvae can be transported upstream in the encroaching salt wedge during 
the dry season, provided that this season (usually summer months) corresponds 
to spawning season. 

Laboratory studies of the salinity tolerances of stage I and II nauplii of 
B. balanoides (Linnaeus), B. balanus (Linnaeus), and B. crenatus Bruguiére 
were made by Barnes (1953), and Crisp and Costlow (1963) investigated the 
effects of varying salinities on the developing eggs and early naupliar stages of 
B. amphitrite amphitrite Darwin, B. eburneus, and Chelonibia patula Ranzani. 
The results from these two studies agree rather closely. Cytolysis of eggs was 
observed in all three species examined by Crisp and Costlow at salinities of 10 
parts per thousand or less, regardless of temperature. Early stage nauplii of 
both studies died in salinities of 5 parts per thousand or less after only slight 
exposure, and could not withstand prolonged exposure to salinities below 10 
parts per thousand. There was, however, some indication that larvae hatched 
from embryos developed at lowered salinities were better adapted to brackish 
conditions. 

The survival ability of B. improvisus larvae in lowered salinities may be 
greater than that of other estuarine barnacles. Mohammad (1962), in a field 
and laboratory study of the distribution of barnacle larvae in Newport River, 
North Carolina, indicated that B. improvisus larvae could tolerate salinity as 
low as O parts per thousand, whereas the lower limit for those of B. eburneus 
was about 8 parts per thousand. If larval salinity tolerance were the limiting 
factor in the distribution of barnacles in estuaries, then B. improvisus should 
be expected in fresh water. However, this is not the case under natural con- 
ditions, suggesting that other factors are also limiting. 

The only readily apparent physical difference between the two fresh water 
localities cited here and natural estuarine habitats is direction of current flow. 
Under natural conditions, larvae must counteract river current once outside 
the encroaching salt wedge, and Crisp and Costlow (1963) have noted that 


70 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH Ser. 


Ficures 8-10. Opercular valves of Balanus eburneus Gould, CAS locality 42617, St. 
Georges Island, Bermuda, height of scuta and tergum 7.5 mm. Ficures 11-15. Balanus 
eburneus Gould, CAS locality 42618, Eniwetok, Marshall Islands. Figures 11 and 13, 
scutum, height 4 mm.; figures 12 and 14, terga, height 4 mm.; figure 15, labrum, 100. 


larval swimming ability is greatly decreased in lowered salinity. In pumped 
irrigation systems, however, weak swimming larvae can be swept up from 
river channels and carried into normally unattainable environments. Whether 


Vor. XXXIX] ZULLO, BEACH, & CARLTON: BARNACLE RECORDS 71 


ot s 
' ‘ae &: 
" : 
“a : 
19 —_— 

Ficures 16-20. Creusia domingensis Des Moulins, CAS locality 42616, Bermuda. 
Figures 16-17, terga, height 2.5 mm., and figures 18-19, scutum, height 2.5 mm.; figure 
20, shell in Porites astreoides, greatest diameter of orifice 0.9 mm. FicurEs 21-22. Shell of 
Hexacreusia durhami (Zullo), CAS locality 27229, Panama, greatest diameter 3.5 mm. 


Figure 21, uncoated shell showing radii; figure 22, shell coated with ammonium chloride 
to show external sculpture (apex of rostrum is damaged). 


or not flow reversal is an adequate explanation for these unusual occurrences, 
the possibility remains that barnacles may pose serious fouling problems in 
irrigation systems. 


Creusia domingensis Des Moulins, 1866. 
(Figures 16-20.) 


A coral-inhabiting barnacle of the genus Creusia Leach was also found by 
Mrs. Gordon in Bermuda in 1967. The specimens are in two small heads of the 


72 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


coral Porites astreoides (Lamarck). The larger coral fragment, measuring 
about seven centimeters in greatest diameter, contains eleven barnacles, and the 
smaller, measuring about four centimeters, harbors three individuals. 

These barnacles were identified through the kindness of Mr. Arnold Ross 
of the Natural History Museum, San Diego, who is presently preparing a 
monographic study of coral-inhabiting balanids. He indicated that they 
probably represent Creusia domingensis; a species originally described in P. 
astreoides from Port-au-Prince, Haiti (Des Moulins, 1866), but which has 
gone unnoticed since that time. Further examination of specimens of P. 
astreoides in the collections of the California Academy of Sciences (CAS) and 
of the University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley (UCMP) 
disclosed additional localities for C. domingensis from the vicinity of Biscayne 
Bay, on the east coast of Florida (CAS locality no. 42265) and from the Dry 
Tortugas, off southern Florida in the Gulf of Mexico (UCMP locality nos. 
A-8146, A-8149, B-3717). 

Previously, coral barnacles have been reported from the eastern Gulf of 
Mexico and the West Indies in the Tropical Atlantic region. The discovery of 
C. domingensis in the Bermudas and in southern Florida thus significantly 
increases the known range both of this little known species and of coralophilous 
balanids as a group. 


Hexacreusia durhami (Zullo, 1961). 


(Figures 21-22. 


This six plated coral barnacle was originally described as a species of 
Balanus Da Costa and placed in a new subgenus, Hexacreusia Zullo (Zullo, 
1961). It was found in late Pliocene, Pleistocene, and Recent specimens of the 
coral Porites californica Verrill from various localities in the Gulf of California, 
and was later reported in extant specimens of the same coral from the Tres 
Marias Islands, Mexico, just south of the Gulf of California by Ross (1962). 

Although Hexacreusia is related to Balanus, and especially to the subgenus 
Armatobalanus Hoek, it is more closely allied to the genera Creusia Leach and 
Pyrgoma Gray, with which it shares a cup-formed basis, “creusioid’”’ rather 
than “balanoid” opercular valves, and an obligate coralophilous habitat. For 
these reasons, Hexacreusia is removed from the genus Balanus and raised to 
generic rank. 

It was noted earlier (Zullo, 1967) that certain specimens included by 
Darwin (1854) in his original description of the Australasian species Balanus 
allium were, in fact, Hexacreusia durhami. These barnacles were in a coral 
from Hugh Cuming’s collection purported to be from Australia, but which 
is most probably Porites californica from the Pacific Coast of tropical America. 
As Cuming had spent some time in Central America, but had never traveled 


Vor. XXXIX] ZULLO, BEACH, & CARLTON: BARNACLE RECORDS ae 


north of the Gulf of Fonseca, Honduras, it was suggested that Darwin’s speci- 
mens came from an area south of its present-known range. 

Confirmation of the presence of Hexacreusia durhami in Central America 
is based on the recent acquisition of two lots from Panama. A beachworn piece 
of Porites californica collected by Dr. Leo G. Hertlein of the California 
Academy of Sciences on December 22, 1931, at Bahia Honda, Veragua, Panama 
(CAS-Geology locality no. 27229) contains three shells of Hexacreusia durhami 
without opercular valves. The second lot, made available by Professor J. Wyatt 
Durham of the University of California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP), 
consists of about two dozen specimens in a large fragment of a Porites question- 
ably identified as P. lobata (Dana). The coral was collected by Dr. Peter W. 
Glynn of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (Canal Zone, Panama) 
from depths between 10 and 20 feet off the Las Secas Islands, Golfo de 
Chiriqui, Panama (UCMP locality no. D-4138). These barnacles were alive 
when taken and still retain opercular valves and bodies, although the latter 
are unsuitable for dissection because of bleaching and drying during processing 
of the coral. 

Hexacreusia durhami is probably present in Porites throughout the Panamic 
Province, but apparently is absent from the faunas of offshore Eastern Pacific 
islands. Extensive examination of hermatypic corals from the Galapagos Archi- 
pelago, Cocos Island (Costa Rica), and Clipperton Island has failed to yield 
coral barnacles, although a second species, to be described at a later date, has 
been discovered in ahermatypic corals from deeper water (90 meters) in the 
Galapagos. 


REFERENCES CITED 


Barnes, H. 
1953. The effect of lowered salinities on some barnacle nauplii. Journal of Animal 
Ecology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 328-330. 
Cartton, J. T., anD V. A. ZULLO 
1969. Early records of the barnacle Balanus improvisus Darwin from the Pacific coast 
of North America. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, 
no. 75, pp. 1-6. 
Crisp, D. J., AND J. D. CostLow 
1963. The tolerance of developing cirripede embryos to salinity and temperature. 
Oikos, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 22-34. 
Darwin, C. 
1854. A monograph on the sub-class Cirripedia, Balanidae, Verrucidae. Ray Society, 
London, viii + 684 pp., 30 pls., 11 text figs. 
Des Mouvutins, Cu. 
1866. Liste des principaux fossiles recueilles par les membres de la Société a Cazeneuve 
dans le calcaire de Bazas. Actes de la Société Linnéene de Bordeaux, tome 
26, ser. 3; tome 6, pp. 293-344. 
Hanna, G D. 
1966. Introduced mollusks of Western North America. Occasional Papers of the 
California Academy of Sciences, no. 48, pp. 1-108, figs. 1-85, pls. 1-4. 


74 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Henry, Dora P. 
1942. Studies on the sessile Cirripedia of the Pacific coast of North America. Univer- 
sity of Washington Publications in Oceanography, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 95-134, 
pls. 14, figs. 1-5. 
1958. Intertidal barnacles of Bermuda. Journal of Marine Research, vol. 17, pp. 
215-234, pls. 1-9. 
HERTLEIN, L. G. 
1951. Invertebrate fossils and fossil localities in the San Francisco Bay Area. In 
Geologic guidebook of the San Francisco Bay Counties. State of California 
Division of Mines, Bulletin 154, pp. 187-192, figs. 1-2. 
Martsu1, T., G. SHANE, AND W. NEWMAN 
1964. On Balanus eburneus Gould (Cirripedia, Thoracica) in Hawaii. Crustaceana, 
vol. 7, pt. 2, pp. 141-145, text fig. 1. 
MonammMap, Murap-B. M. 
1962. Larval distribution of three species of Balanomorpha in relation to some 
chemico-physical factors. Proceedings of the First National Coastal and 
Shallow Water Research Conference, October, 1961, pp. 360-361. 
NEwMan, W. A. 
1967. On physiology and behaviour of estuarine barnacles. Proceedings of Symposium 
on Crustacea, Marine Biological Association of India, pt. 3, pp. 1038-1066, 
figs. 1-9. 
Piussry, H. A. 
1907. Hawaiian Cirripedia. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries, vol. 26, pp. 179-190, 
pls. 4—S. 
ProxopovicyH, N. P. 
1968. Organic life in the Delta-Mendota Canal, Central Valley Project-California. 
United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Region 2, 
Sacramento, California, x + 126 pp., 5 appendices. 
Ross, A. 
1962. Results of the Puritan-American Museum of Natural History Expedition to 
Western Mexico, 15. The littoral balanomorph Cirripedia. American Museum 
Novitates, no. 2084, pp. 1-44, figs. 1-24. 
SHATOURY, H. H. 
1958. A freshwater mutant of Balanus amphitrite. Nature, vol. 181, no. 4611, pp. 
790-791, fig. 1. 
UtTiInomiI, H. 
1966. Recent immigration of two foreign barnacles into Japanese waters. Proceedings 
of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, no. 2, pp. 36-39, text figs. 1-2. 
WELTNER, W. 
1897. Verzeichnis der bisher beschriebenen recenten Cirripedienarten. Archiv fir 
Naturgeschichte, Jahrgang 1897, Band 1, pp. 227-280. 
ZWELEO IN ee Ne 
1961. A new subgenus and species of coral-inhabiting barnacle from the Gulf of 
California. The Veliger, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 71-75, pl. 17, text figs. 1-2. 
1967. On the identity of some specimens assigned by Darwin, 1854, to Balanus allium 
Darwin (Cirripedia, Thoracica). Crustaceana, vol. 13, pt. 1, pp. 126-128. 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XX XIX, No. 7, pp. 75-86, 4 figs; 3 tables. September 5, 1972 


A KEY, BASED ON SCALES, 
TO THE FAMILIES OF NATIVE 
CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER FISHES 


By 


Richard W. Casteel 


Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis 95616 


Asstract: Much interdisciplinary interest has been shown with regard to fish scales 
in addition to their use in fisheries biology. To aid future workers, a key to the 
scales of the native California freshwater fish families is presented along with photo- 
micrographs of scales from each group. 


INTRODUCTION 


Fish scales have been used in fisheries biology and systematic ichthyology 
for many years. Within fisheries studies, emphasis has been placed upon the use 
of scales in age and growth studies (Cable, 1956; Cating, 1954; Chugunova, 
1959; Cooper, 1951, 1952; Fry, 1943; Hile, 1936; Hogman, 1970; Jensen and 
Wise, 1961; Miller, 1955; Phillips, 1948; Rush, 1952; Schuck, 1949; Taylor, 
1916; Whitney and Carlander, 1956; Meehean, 1935). Various keys, based upon 
the morphology of scales, have been published dealing with species identification 
within families and with the identification of families comprising regional fish 
faunas (Batts, 1964; Lagler, 1947; Koo, 1962). 

Fish scales have been used in palaeontological work (David, 1944, 1946a, 
1946b), sediment analysis (Lagler and Vallentyne, 1956; Pennington and Frost, 
1961; Soutar and Isaacs, 1969), and archaeology (Follett, 1967a, 1967b; Hubbs 
and Miller, 1948). Even within fisheries work, scales have been encountered 
during analysis of the stomach contents of various fishes (Greenfield, Ross, and 
Deckert, 1970; Kimsey, 1954). Based upon this evidently wide interdisciplinary 
interest in and use of fish scales, it is felt that a scale-based key to the families 
of native freshwater fishes of California would be a useful aid. 


[75] 
Marine Biological Laboratory 
LIBRARY 
SEP 15 1972 
Woods Hole, Mass. 


76 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


TABLE 1. Species examined. 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


Species 


Source 


Thaleichthys pacificus 
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 
O. kisutch 

Salmo gairdnerii 

S. g. gairdnerii 

S. g. stonei 

S. g. gilberti 

S. g. aquilarum 

S. clarkii clarkii 

S. c. henshawi 

S. c. seleniris 

S. aguabonita aguabonita 

S. a. whitei 

Salvelinus malma parkei 
Prosopium williamsoni 
Xyrauchen texanus 
Catostomus luxatus 

. platyrhynchus 

. Santaanae 

. rimiculus 

. latipinnis 

. occidentalis occidentalis 

. 0. humboldtianus 

. mniotiltus 

. tahoensis 

Rhinichthys osculus klamathensis 
Mylopharodon conocephalus 
Orthodon microlepidotus 
Pogonichthys macrolepidotus 
Lavinia exilicauda exilicauda 
L. e. harengus 
Ptychocheilus grandis 


PD WY Py OS) B} &) 


Hesperoleucas symmetricus symmetricus 
H. s. subditus 

H. s. venustus 

H. navarroensis 


—  H.. parvipinnis 


~ Gila bicolor bicolor 
., -G~.b>, obesa 


psy GeO. pectinifera 


G. mohavensis 
>» G. crassicauda 
G. orcutti : 


CAS* 
VED 
CAS, UCD 
UCD 
UCD 
UCD 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
UCD 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS, UCD 
UCD 
UCD 
UCD 
CAS 
UCD 
UCD 
CAS 
CAS, UCD 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS, UCD 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 
CAS 


1 CAS = specimens from California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco. 


2UCD = specimens from the author’s personal collection, presently at University of California, Davis. 


VoL. XXXIX] CASTEEL: KEY TO CALIFORNIA FISHES 77 


TABLE 1. (continued) 


Species Source 
G. elegans CAS 
Richardsonius balteatus egregius CAS 
Cyprinodon macularius californiensis CAS 
C. nevadensis nevadensis CAS 
C. n. calidae CAS 
C. n. shoshone CAS 
C. salinus CAS 
Fundulus parvipinnis CAS 
Mugil cephalis CAS 
Archoplites interruptus UCD 
Hysterocarpus traskii CASTUCED 


For the purposes of this paper, native freshwater fishes will refer to those 
fishes which occur exclusively in freshwater or spend a significant portion of 
their life-cycle in freshwater and which occurred in California prior to the known 
introduction of exotic species during and after the nineteenth century (Kimsey 
and Fisk, 1960; Shapovalov, Dill, and Cordone, 1959; Walford, 1931). The 
only exception has been the inclusion of the Mugilidae because of their impor- 
tance in the Colorado River. 


METHODS AND MATERIALS 


The scales studied come from 54 species of native fishes (table 1) and 
represent specimens collected by the author or by members of the California 
Department of Fish and Game, and specimens from the California Academy of 


TABLE 2. Scale sampling locations. 


. Row anterior to dorsal fin. 
. Right side, below dorsal fin, above lateral line. 
. Left side, below dorsal fin, above lateral line. 


. Right side, below dorsal fin, below lateral line. 


Marine Biological Laboratory 
LIBRARY 
SEP 15 1972 

Woods Hole, Mass. 


. Left side, below dorsal fin, below lateral line. 
. Right side, caudal penduncle, above lateral line. 


. Left side, caudal penduncle, above lateral line. 


ncluifoptel= Iles ipaleoiel i acial = 


. Right side, caudal penduncle, below lateral line. 
I. Left side, caudal penduncle, below lateral line. 


J. Row posterior to dorsal fin. 


78 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


TaBLeE 3. Scale characteristics of California 
freshwater fish families. 


Family Ctenoid Scales Cycloid Scales Scutes Neither 


Petromyzonidae xX 
Acipenseridae x 

Osmeridae 
Salmonidae 


Catostomidae 


me mM 


Cyprinidae 
Gasterosteidae x 
Cyprinodontidae x x? 

Mugilidae 
Centrarchidae x 

Embiotocidae xe 

Cottidae x 


a 


3 Scales of these families, while being cycloid, should be oriented as shown for ctenoid scales in figure 1 b. 


Sciences, San Francisco. Table III indicates the general scale characteristics 
of the fishes in this study. 

The fish were sampled for scales from ten different body locations (table 
2) on the author’s specimens. For reasons of future use, the specimens from the 
California Acadamy of Sciences could only be sampled from six locations on the 
right-hand side of the fish. Wherever possible, samples were taken from several 
individuals of different sizes within a species in order to allow for ontogenetic 
variations. All scale samples were mounted in glycerine jelly on microscope 
slides (Weesner, 1960) and examined under a dissecting microscope at between 
ten and thirty magnifications. 


DEFINITIONS 


The terms used here to describe the surface features of scales are taken from 
Lagler (1947, pp. 150-151) and are illustrated in figure 1. 


Circuli — “Elevated markings on the outer surface; usually appearing as lines 
which more or less follow the outline shape of the scale.” 
Focus — “First part of scale to appear in growth; often central.” 
Radi — “Grooves, usually more or less radiating from focus to one or more 
margins.” 
Primary Radu — “Radii that extend from focus to margin.” 
Secondary Radi — “Radii that begin outward from, not at, focus.” 


Ctenu — “Tooth-like structures on posterior portion of scale.” 


Vor. XXXIX] CASTEEL: KEY TO CALIFORNIA FISHES 79 


CIRCULI 


LATERAL 
FIELD 


PRIMARY 
RADII 


SD 
ae Dy iy POSTERIOR 
ZB FIELD 
Zz 
ANTERIOR 
FIELD 
SECONDARY 
RADII 
LATERAL 
FIELD 
SECONDARY 
RADII 
Ay Bie S _/cTENII 
oe Die } ve a = 
ANTERIOR K nt Lae WEN 3 eS = 
FIELD am MEE gow Soe “Ss FOCUS 
aD ; “iy ae ae Ge 
aS De Dw 
p me Zee —- Soe 
bs SS POSTERIOR 
PRIMARY wy SIS ae 
RADII i WSS. z 
: ; - ma 


: —— 
Se 
LATERAL CIRCULI 


FIELD 
Figure 1. Top. Cycloid Scale. Cyprinidae. Mvylopharodon  conocephalus. UCD 
5040 C. Bottom. Ctenoid Scale. Centrarchidae. Archoplites interruptus. UCD 5021 E. 


80 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


yi 
wy, 


FicureE 2. a. Cyprinodontidae. Cyprinodon macularius californiensis. UCD 5063 G. 
b. Centrarchidae. Archoplites interruptus. UCD 5021 E. c. Mugilidae. Mugil cephalus. 
UCD 5056 I. 


Fields — ‘Areas of the outer surface of the scale, either real as delimited by 
angulation of the ridges (circuli) at levels of the four principal 
corners or imaginary if the corners or configuration of the circuli are 
wanting. Adjectives of direction applied to fields are based on their 
positions when the scales are normally situated on the side of the 


fish.” 

Anterior Field — “Bounded by imaginary lines connecting the anterolateral 
corners, or their equivalent points on scales which are 
rounded (dorsal and ventral) with the focus.” 

Posterior Field — “Bounded by imaginary lines connecting the posterolateral 
corners (dorsal and ventral) with the focus.” 

Lateral Fields — “Dorsal and ventral fields remaining after delimitation of 


anterior and posterior ones.” 


Vou. XXXIX] CASTEEL: KEY TO CALIFORNIA FISHES 81 


Ficure 3. a. Salmonidae, Salmo gairdnerii gairdnerii. UCD 5002 D. b. Salmonidae. 
Prosopium williamsoni. UCD 5016 C. c. Catostomidae. Catostomus occidentalis 
occidentalis. UCD 5026 C. 


SCALE-BASED KEY TO THE FAMILIES OF 


CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER FISHES 


The following is a key to the family level with the exception of Prosopium 
williamsoni which is identified to species. 

The Cyprinodontidae are characterized by both ctenoid and cycloid scales in 
the same individual. Lagler (1947, pp. 156-157) classified the Cyprinodontidae 
of the Great Lakes as having cycloid scales and the same appears true of the 
genus Fundulus in California. However, the other members of this family may 
also possess ctenoid scales (Lagler, Bardach, and Miller, 1962, p. 114). For this 
reason the key identifies this family twice, once on the basis of ctenoid scales and 
again on the basis of cycloid scales. This same case appears true of the Centrar- 
chidae (Lagler, Bardach, and Miller, 1962, p. 114). Based upon data from my 
collections, however, I find cycloid scales to occur only once in 32 samples and 


82 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 4. a. Cyprinidae. Mylopharodon conocephalus. UCD 5040 C. b. Cyprinodon- 
tidae. Cyprinodon macularius californiensis. UCD 5063 A. c. Embiotocidae. Hysterocarpus 
traskiz. UCD 5099 C. 


then only from restricted areas of the body in centrarchids (table 2, A). This is a 
rather low frequency and if one considers the total number of scales over a fish’s 
body, it appears that occurrence of cycloid scales in Archoplites interruptus will 
be even more rare. I agree, therefore, that ‘These fishes may still be considered 
as predominantly ctenoid in their squamation but the degree and extent of 
development of the ctenii varies from place to place on the body” (Lagler, 
Bardach, and Miller, 1962, p. 114). In the rare event that a cycloid scale from 
this family should present itself in isolation it will key out as representing the 
Embiotocidae instead of the Centrarchidae. 

Figures 2, 3, and 4 illustrate each of the families or species separated by the 
key. Each illustration is oriented with the anterior field to the observer’s left. 
iva) Ctentiy present omisposterion) eile cl ee ee) 


b)! (Ctenit “absent on ‘posterior field == ee eee 
2. a) Ctenii numerous and evenly spaced 


VoL. XXXIX] CASTEEL: KEY TO CALIFORNIA FISHES 83 


b) Ctenii not numerous and irregularly spaced — eee Cyprinodontidae 
(figure 2, a) 

3. a) Radii converge toward focus ae Se ee RR PowresNGAaD Centrarchidae 
(specifically Archoplites interruptus ; figure 2, b) 

I eacimerouchiveunarallel) <2. 2 ee ee Mugilidae 
(specifically Mugil cephalus; figure 2, c) 

Pe mSCHeMmCVClOllmwithouts Tag) 2 a Be 5 


Peal CmGy Cloldenwiliwna Cie sso. 88 ee ee ee 6 
5. a) Scale with anterior and posterior fields only or without fields 

coe neipene tee aE cee eee Osmeridae and Salmonidae 

(figure 3, a) 


b) Scale with four fields; focus centrally located Prosopium williamsoni 

(figure 3, b) 

6. a) Primary radii on both posterior and anterior fields = Catostomidae 

(also includes the cyprinid genera Rhinichthys and Orthodon; figure 3, c) 

b) Primary radii absent on either anterior or posterior field = 7 

7. a) Primary radii present on anterior field, but absent on posterior field — == 8 
b) Primary radii absent on anterior field, but present on posterior field = = 

3 nc pec ME cade oo RS DA PE 8 Cyprinidae 

(figure 4, a) 

Sa ewartewes circuly im lateral than in anterior field —22-- = Cyprinodontidae 


(figure 4, b) 

b) Number of circuli in lateral field approximately equal to number in anterior 
TT en eS a a Embiotocidae 
(specifically Hysterocarpus traskiz; figure 4, c) 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


I wish to express my thanks to Mr. W. I. Follett and Mrs. L. Dempster of the 
California Academy of Sciences for their advice and cooperation and to Dr. W. G. 
Kinzey, City University of New York, for his support and encouragement during 
the initial phases of this work. My thanks also to Dr. R. W. Brocksen and 
Messrs. L. Courtois, W. Wurtsbaugh, and H. W. Li, Department of Animal 
Physiology, University of California, Davis; to Mr. Lyons, U. S. Department of 
Reclamation; and to Messrs. A. Calhoun, L. Fisk, E. Armstrong, M. Coots, E. P. 
Pister, R. Reavis, and J. Burns, California Department of Fish and Game, for 
their aid in obtaining specimens. I also appreciate the helpful criticisms of the 
manuscript given by Mr. W. I. Follett, California Academy of Sciences; Dr. D. L. 
True, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis; and Dr. 
J. D. Hopkirk, Department of Biology, Sonoma State College. Finally, my thanks 
go to my wife for her help during all phases of this project. 


LITERATURE CITED 


Batts, Bitty S. 
1964. Lepidology of the adult pleuronectiform fishes of Puget Sound, Washington. 
Copeia, 1964, pp. 666-672. 


84 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Caste, L. E. 
1956. Validity of age determination from scales, and growth of marked Lake 
Michigan lake trout. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish Bulletin, no. 107, 
pp. 1-59. 
CatInG; J: P- 
1954. Determining age of Atlantic shad from their scales. U. S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Fish Bulletin, no. 85, pp. 187-199. 
Cuucunova, N. I. 
1959. Age and growth studies in fish: a systematic guide for ichthyologists. Academy 
of Sciences of the U.S. S. R., 132 pp. 
Cooper, E. L. 
1951. Validation of the use of scales of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis, for age 
determination. Copeia, 1951, pp. 141-148. 
1952. Body-scale relationships of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis, in Michigan. 
Copeia, 1952, pp. 1+. 
Davin, Lore R. 
1944. Use of fossil fish scales in micropalaeontology. Carnegie Institution of Washington 
Publication, no. 551, pp. 25-43. 
1946a. Some typical Upper Eogene fish scales from California. Carnegie Institution 
of Washington Publication, no. 551, pp. 45-79. 
1946b. Upper Cretaceous fish remains from the western border of the San Joaquin 
valley, California. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, no. 
551, pp. 81-112. 
Fottett, W. I. 
1967a. Fish remains from coprolites and midden deposits at Lovelock Cave, Churchill 
County, Nevada. Annual Report of the University of California Archaeological 
Survey, no. 70, pp. 94-115. 
1967b. Fish remains from Salinas La Blanca, an archaeological site on the Pacific 
coast of Guatemala. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, vol. 3, 
pp. 129-134. 
Fry, F. E. J. 
1943. A method for the calculation of the growth of fishes from scale measurements. 
Ontario Fisheries Research Laboratory, Publication no. 61, pp. 5-18. 
GREENFIELD, D. W., S. T. Ross, and G. D. DECKERT 
1970. Some aspects of the life history of the Santa Ana Sucker, Catostomus (Pantosteus) 
santaanae (Snyder). California Fish and Game, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 166-179. 
Hirer, R. 
1936. Age and growth of the cisco, Leucichthys artedi (Le Sueur), in the lakes of the 
northwestern highlands, Wisconsin. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish 
Bulletin, no. 19, pp. 211-317. 
Hocman, W. J. 
1970. Early scale development on the Great Lakes coregonids, Coregonus artedii 
and C. kiyiz. In C. C. Lindsey and C. S. Woods (editors), Biology of Coregonid 
Fishes. Winnipeg, pp. 429-435. 
Hupss, C. L., and R. R. Mier 
1948. Correlation between fish distribution and hydrographic history in the desert 
basins of western United States. Jn The Great Basin, with emphasis on glacial 
and postglacial times. Bulletin of the University of Utah, vol. 38, no. 20, pp. 
17-166. 


VoL. XXXIX] CASTEEL: KEY TO CALIFORNIA FISHES 85 


Jensen, A. C., and J. P. WIsE 
1961. Determining age of young haddock from their scales. U. S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Fish Bulletin, vol. 61, pp. 439-450. 
Kinsey, J. B. 
1954. The life history of the tui chub, Siphateles bicolor (Girard), from Eagle Lake, 
California. California Fish and Game, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 395-410. 
Kinsey, J. B., and L. O. Fisk 
1960. Keys to the freshwater and anadromous fishes of California. California Fish 
and Game, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 453-479. 
Koo, T.S. Y. 
1962. Differential scale characters among species of Pacific salmon. Jn T. S. Y. Koo 
(editor), Studies of Alaska Red Salmon. Seattle, pp. 123-135. 
LAGLeR, K. F. 
1947. Scale characters of the families of Great Lakes fishes. American Microscopical 
Society Transactions, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 149-171. 
LActer, K. F., and O. R. VALLENTYNE 
1956. Fish scales in a sediment core from Linsley Pond, Connecticut. Science, vol. 
124, no. 3217, p. 368. 
LAGLER, K. F., J. E. BArpAcH, and R. R. MILLER 
1962. Ichthyology. New York, 545 pp. 
MEEHEAN, O. L. 
1935. The life history of the bluegill sunfish [Helioperca incisor (Cuvier and Valenci- 
ennes) ] as determined from the scales. Proceedings of the Los Angeles Academy 
of Science, vol. 2, pp. 139-145. 
Muter, D. J. 
1955. Studies relating to the validity of the scale method for age determination of the 
northern anchovy (Engraulis mordax). California Division of Fish and 
Game, Fish Bulletin, no. 101, pp. 6-34. 
PENNINGTON, W., and W. E. Frost 
1961. Fish vertebrae and scales in a sediment core from Estwaite Water (English 
Lake District). Hydrobiologia, vol. 17, pp. 183-190. 
Purtrps, J. B. 
1948. Comparison of calculated fish lengths based on scales from different body 
areas of the sardine, Sardinops caerulea. Copeia, 1948, pp. 99-106. 
Rus, W. A. 
1952. Observations of age and growth in the menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus) as 
determined by scale examination. Copeia, 1952, pp. 208-209. 
ScHuck, H. A. 
1949. Problems in calculating size of fish at various ages from proportional measurements 
of fish and scale sizes. Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 
298-303. 
SHAPOVALOV,L., W. A. Dirt, and A. J. CorDONE 
1959. A revised checklist of the freshwater and anadromous fishes of California. 
California Fish and Game, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 159-180. 
SouTar, A., and J. D. Isaacs 
1969. History of fish populations inferred from fish scales in anaerobic sediments 
off California. California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations, 
Reports, vol. 13, pp. 63-70. 
TAYLor, H. F. 
1916. The structure and growth of the scales of the squeteague and the pigfish as 


86 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


indicative of life history. U. S. Bureau of Fisheries, Bulletin, no. 34, pp. 


285-330. 
WALForpD, L. A. 
Ny 1931. Handbook of common commercial and game fishes of California. California 


a \ Division of Fish and Game, Fish Bulletin, no. 28. 
3°: WEESNER, F. M. 
1960. General zoological microtechniques. Baltimore. 
Wuirtney, R. R., and K. D. CARLANDER 
1956. Interpretation of body-scale regression for computing body length of fish. 
Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 20, pp. 21-27. 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 8, pp. 87-103. September 5, 1972 


THE LYGAEIDAE OF THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS 
(Hemiptera:Heteroptera) 


By 
Peter D. Ashlock 


University of Kansas, Lawrence 


With the publication of this paper, reports on the Heteroptera of the Gala- 
pagos International Scientific Project are nearly complete. Published papers 
cover the Anthocoridae (Herring, 1966), the Tingidae (Drake and Froeschner, 
1967), the Saldidae and Veliidae (Polhemus, 1968a, b), the Cydnidae ( Froeschner, 
1968), the Nabidae (Kerzhner, 1968), the Miridae (Carvalho and Gagné, 1968), 
and the emesine Reduviidae (Villiers, 1970). The families Pentatomidae, Corei- 
dae, Rhopalidae, Stenocephalidae, Berytidae, Pyrrhocoridae, Reduviidae, Gerri- 
dae, and Corixidae also are found in the Galapagos Islands, and members of the 
expedition collected all but Pyrrhocoridae and Stenocephalidae. Hopefully, the 
many new island records in these families will be summarized in another contri- 
bution. The collections of only the Rhopalidae may still prove to contain new 
species. 

Before the expedition, Dr. Usinger and I had hopes of greatly increasing 
the number of Lygaeidae recorded from the islands, especially in the subfamily 
Orsillinae, a group well known for its ability to colonize islands. Only four species 
of Lygaeidae, including two orsillines, had previously been recorded from the 
Galapagos (Linsley and Usinger, 1966). Herein I am able to report only nine 
species of lygaeids—five are orsillines—of which two, including one of the 
orsillines, are possibly introduced by man. While more lygaeids may be found in 
the archipelago, I seriously doubt that the known endemic fauna of the group 
will double again. Because the lygaeid fauna of Hawaii contains forty percent 
of the world orsillines, the sparse fauna of the Galapagos deserves some explana- 
tion. 


[87] 
Marine Biological Laboratory 
LIBRARY 
SEP 15 1972 
Woods Hole, Mass. 


88 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 47H Ser. 


MacArthur and Wilson (1967) discuss the factors that determine the intro- 
duction and extinction rates of island faunas as they develop the concept of an 
island colonization rate. Further, they postulate that each island or archipelago 
has a fairly fixed capacity for numbers of species. Among islands populated 
from American sources, the Galapagos have a far better chance of receiving 
introductions than do most other islands of the eastern Pacific, primarily because 
they form an archipelago. The Hawaiian Islands, a larger archipelago, would 
have received fewer introductions because of its great isolation. 

Some examples will illustrate the point. The smallest orsilline faunas are 
those of Guadelupe Island, 180 miles off Baja California, and San Felix, 550 
miles west of Chile, each having a single undescribed endemic species (belonging 
to Ortholomus and Nvysius, respectively). The Juan Fernandez Islands, two 
islands about 450 miles off the coast of Chile, have two endemic orsillines, V ysius 
baeckstroemi and Robinsonocoris tingitoides, the latter an endemic genus. The 
Galapagos Islands have five species, resulting from four introductions, including 
the endemic genus Darwinysius with two species. The Hawaiian fauna by 
contrast is rich. Of the 92 species of Orsillinae, the tribe Metrargini | probably 
of American origin (Ashlock, 1967) | contains 58 species (in six endemic genera) 
resulting from but two introductions. The remaining Hawaiian species (in 
Nysius and the endemic Nesomartis, a probable derivative of Nysius) are of 
unknown origin. Clearly, the Galapagos have a much higher introduction rate 
than Hawaii, but the larger, more hospitable Hawaiian Islands have a lower 
extinction rate than the dryer and smaller Galapagos. 

Thus, possible ecological situations on the Galapagos are nearly saturated 
by naturally introduced orsillines. Hawaii’s isolation has allowed few intro- 
ductions, but its low extinction rate, combined with the large number of ecological 
situations, permitted explosive radiation. 

Linsley and Usinger (1966) acknowledge those that made the G.I.S.P. expe- 
dition possible. I must add my own thanks to the late R. L. Usinger, who made 
my participation possible. Much of the work on this paper was done at the 
B. P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, with financial help from two NSF grants 
(GB-3105 and GB—5860). Types of new species are deposited in the California 
Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, and specimens upon which the study was 
based will be found in that institution and in the Bishop Museum; the U. S. 
National Museum; the California Insect Survey, Berkeley; and the collections 
of J. A. Slater, G. G. E. Scudder, M. H. Sweet, and myself. All measurements are 
in millimeters, and the year of collection is 1964 unless otherwise noted. 


Kry To GALAPAGOS GENERA OF LYGAEIDAE 


1. Suture between abdominal segments IV and V (second visible suture) curving anteriorly, 
not reaching lateral margin of abdomen —____ Rhyparochrominae: Myodochini — 2 
Suture between segments IV and V not curving anteriorly, clearly reaching lateral margin 
Olgabdom ery es eee jee 3 


VoL. XXXIX] ASHLOCK: GALAPAGOS LYGAEIDAE 89 


2. Head constricted behind eye; eye removed from base of head by a distance greater than 
NEI EOBITMeEO Teme UTM CV CMe eee eee ee ee Heraeus 
Head not constricted behind eye; eye removed from base of head by a distance less than 
[enc meO lame GE Cy Camere st Le ft. eee ee ee Pachybrachius 

3. Scutellum bifid apically; clavus basally opaque, apically hyaline —— Cyminae: 
Af 111 neem me pt ee Cymoninus 
Scutellum not bifid apically; clavus not divided into distinct opaque and hyaline areas __ 
i @rsillinae yete 2 as a A 

4. Costal margin of corium straight, exposing connexivum of abdomen laterally _ 
ai rr @rsillint 222 2 a ee ee Ori Volomus 
Costal margin of corium straight at most for a distance less than length of scutellum, 
then arcuately curved to apex; connexivum of abdomen completely covered — 5 

5. Buccula not punctate; lateral margin of abdomen and corium without cross-striated 
Giei@haliitieg, 2 ee ee INST 22-2 eee ee ee Nysius 
Either buccula punctate or lateral margin of abdomen and corium with cross-striated 
SUINIGIUIT ic, Se Metrarr gin .2 222 i ate eee 6 

6. Buccula punctate, not tapering, ending abruptly at base of head; antenniferous tubercle 
acutely produced; abdomen and corium without stridulatory structures —— 
oper ee rrr rr a ee aS ee Darwinysius 
Buccula impunctate, tapering to a low carina well before base of head; antenniferous 
tubercle not acutely produced; abdomen and corium laterally with cross-striated stridu- 
PROVES ENUGEU LC meee eeaeeee ae Se et ee eee Xyonysius 


Genus Nysius Dallas 
Nysius DALLAS, 1852, p. 551. 

Although two species from the Galapagos were originally described in 
the cosmopolitan genus \Vysius, both have since been placed in other orsilline 
genera in the tribe Metrargini. Nysius (Ortholomus) naso Van Duzee is placed 
in Xyonysius (Ashlock and Lattin, 1963) and Nysius (?) marginalis Dallas is 
placed in Darwinysius (Ashlock, 1967). The following is the first true Nysius 
to be reported from the Islands. 


Nysius usitatus Ashlock, new species. 
(Figures 1, 3.) 

Head nearly flat between eyes, densely punctate, sparsely clothed with 
appressed pale hairs, length 0.66, width 0.88, anteocular length 0.27, eye 
length 0.29, eye width 0.19, interocular space 0.48; buccula widest anteriorly, 
tapering posteriorly, and ending abruptly just before base of head; labium 
extending to between hind coxae, first segment not reaching base of head but 
just exceeding buccula, segment lengths from base 0.39, 0.39, 0.37, 0.29; 
antenna with first segment exceeding clypeus by nearly half its length, segment 
lengths from base 0.26, 0.60, 0.49, 0.49. 

Pronotum moderately clothed with fine curved subappressed hairs, disk 
densely punctate, distance between punctures from one-half to one diameter 
of a puncture, sides nearly straight; length 0.59, width 1.02. Scutellum 


arine Biological Laboratory 
LIBRARY 
SEP 15 1972 
Woods Hole, Mass. 


90 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


FicureE 1. Dorsal views of (left) Nysius usitatus and (right) Ortholomus usingeri. 


with vestiture and punctation similar to those of pronotum; Y-shaped carina 
appearing as a tumid pyramid; length 0.48, width 0.58. 

Hemelytron exceeding abdomen, clavus and corium with surface almost 
dull, moderately clothed with subappressed curved hairs, with additional 
hairs projecting laterally along base of costal margin, clavus obscurely punctate 
only at base of claval suture, costal margins subparallel and paralleling vein R+M 
to level of apical two-thirds of scutellum, then gently becoming divergent 
and arcuate to apex of corium, veins evident but not prominent; length of 
claval commissure 0.34; length of corium 1.50; membrane normal with 
veins evident but not distinct, basal length to level of corial apex 0.65, apical 
length from corial apex 0.77. 

Color. Light reddish brown, with broad stripe passing through each 
ocellus, margins of clypeus, three spots at base of clypeus, ventor except 
buccula, and spot below eye black. Buccula, labium, and antenna yellowish 
brown, first segment of antenna a little darker. Pronotum light yellowish brown, 


VoL. XXXIX | ASHLOCK: GALAPAGOS LYGAEIDAE 91 


with partial indistinct median stripe, broad complete stripe behind each ocellus, 
and narrow lateral stripe dark brown, callosities black. Scutellum black or 
nearly so, apex white. Hemelytra light yellowish brown with indistinct brown 
spots on veins and apical margin. Membrane hyaline, embrowned medially 
except veins obscurely opaque white, ventor black except anterior and posterior 
margins of propleura, acetabula, scent gland area, metapleural plate, and spots 
laterally and apically on abdomen pale. Legs pale yellowish brown, with usual 
brown spots on femur, tibia with a brown knee band. 

Hototyre. 6, Santa Cruz Island, 1.5 mi. north of Academy Bay, 13 Febru- 
ary, under Portulaca (P. D. Ashlock). 

PaRATYPES. Santa Cruz Island, 9 ¢,10 2, same data as holotype; 1 ?, same 
data but 11 February; 32 ¢,17 2, same data but 15 February; 3 ¢,5 2, same 
data but 25 February; 3 2, Horneman Farm, 220 m., 2 April (D. Q. Cavagnaro). 

Most specimens of this species were collected at the foot of the barranca 
(cliff) on the new trail from Academy Bay, Santa Cruz Island, under Portulaca 
and in company with Darwinysius marginalis. Since Nysius usitatus was 
collected only near Academy Bay on Santa Cruz and not at all from the 
Portulaca habitat on all other islands visited, it may be a recent introduction 
to the Galapagos. Specimens fit Dallas’ (1852, p. 553) description of NV. nubilis 
from Colombia fairly well, but the V. nubilis type is not extant. Dr. Usinger 
searched in vain for it at the British Museum in 1964, and found (corre- 
spondence) that the British Museum copy of the Dallas description has a note: 


) 


“type missing.” I have a short series of Nysius from Guayaquil, Ecuador, 
and another from Palmira, Colombia, that also fit Dallas’ description, but the 
spermathecae differ substantially from that of NM. usitatus (fig. 3). Since 
there is only slight evidence that VV. usitatus is introduced, and its identity with 
N. nubilis is open to question, I have described the Galapagos form as new. The 
problem of the identity of VV. nubilis can best be solved by the judicious choice 
of a neotype when adequate series of NV ysius are available from northwestern 


South America. 


Genus Ortholomus Stal 


Nysius (Ortholomus) STAL, 1872, p. 43. 
Ortholomus Stal, BAKER, 1906, p. 134. 


Ortholomus usingeri Ashlock, new species. 
(Figures 1, 3.) 

Head flattened between eyes, obscurely punctate, densely covered with 
flattened appressed hairs, vertex carina straight, eye prominent, slightly 
raised above vertex; length 0.85, width 1.11, anteocular length 0.44, eye 
length 0.22, eye width 0.29, interocular space 0.61; buccula widest anteriorly, 


92 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 2. Dorsal views of (left) Darwinysius wenmanensis and (right) Xyonysius naso. 


gradually narrowing posteriorly to mid eye level without abrupt change in 
width; labium reaching between posterior coxae, first segment exceeding 
buccula, not reaching base of head, segment lengths from base 0.46, 0.43, 0.46, 
0.39; antenna with fine erect pubescence, first segment slightly exceeding 
clypeus, segment lengths from base 0.29, 0.46, 0.44, 0.49. 

Pronotum clothed with appressed flattened somewhat silky hairs, with 
occasional short erect hairs, moderately punctate, distance between punctures 
from one-half to one diameter of a puncture, sides straight, slightly swollen, 
length 0.78, width 1.28. Scutellum with vestiture and punctation like those 
of pronotum, Y-shaped carina swollen on upper arms, stem not prominent, 
length 0.54, width 0.75. 

Hemelytron slightly exceeding abdomen, clavus and corium moderately 
clothed with short silky appressed hairs, with a few short erect hairs projecting 


VoL. XXXIX] ASHLOCK: GALAPAGOS LYGAEIDAE 93 


laterally along base of costal margin; veins evident but not prominent; length 
of claval commissure 0.49; length of corium 1.80; membrane irregularly 
wrinkled transversely; veins distinct, basal length to level of corial apex 0.77, 
apical length from corial apex 0.78. 

Abdomen with connexival spiracles raised, very prominent. 

Color. Head very dark brown, clypeus, median stripe on posterior half 
of vertex, buccula, labium, and antenna paler except antennal segment IV very 
dark brown. Pronotum and scutellum reddish brown, callosities and punctures 
a little darker. Hemelytron pale yellowish brown, darkened apically on clavus 
and corium and on obscure spots on veins; vestiture nearly white, silky. 
Connexival segments pale, darker around pale spiracles. Legs yellowish brown, 
femur with obscure, slightly darker spots. Ventor reddish brown, acetabula and 
scent gland paler. 

Hototype. ¢, Santa Cruz Island, grassland, 1,800 ft., north of Academy Bay, 
20 February, on Hypericum pratense (P. D. Ashlock). 

PARATYPES. Santa Cruz Island, 6 ¢, 12 2,4 nymphs, same data as holotype; 
feo, ) 2, same data but 2,100 it.; 1 ¢, 1 9%, Bella Vista, 26 February (R. L. 
Usinger); 15 ¢, 15 2, Table Mountain, 440 m., 16 April (D. Q. Cavagnero). 
Floriana Island, 1 ¢, 1 2, 15 February, Verbena (R. L. Usinger); 57 6, 48 2, 
Whitmer’s Farm, 15 February, Verbena (R. L. Usinger); 1 ¢,2 2, same data but 
Cordia species; 1 ¢, 1 2, moist forest 200 m. above Black Beach, 15 February, 
Cordia tree with yellow flowers (R. L. Usinger); 7 ¢, 10 2, 18 February 
(R. L. Usinger). San Cristobal Island, 3 ¢,4 2, Progresso, 23 February, Verbena 
(R. L. Usinger). 

Ortholomus usingeri is less elongate than most of the described species 
in the genus, and the connexivum is more broadly exposed, being approached 
only by O. gibbus (Berg) in this respect. The spiracles are more prominent 
and enlarged than in any other species. All series of the species are variable 
in color, ranging from the pale form illustrated (fig. 1), to specimens that are 
highly maculated on the corium, clavus, and membrane. Some specimens have a 
very dark, contrasting claval apex. None of these variations are correlated 
with island of origin or with host plant. The new species of Ortholomus from 
Guadelupe Island (see Introduction) may be very closely related to O. usingeri. 

It is with devoted appreciation that I dedicate this Galapagos orsilline to 
R. L. Usinger, who was the leading authority in the Orsillinae, and whose 
leadership of the G. I. S. P. expedition he considered the high point of his life. 


Genus Darwinysius Ashlock 
Darwinysius ASHLOCK, 1967, p. 42. 
Darwinysius is the only endemic genus of Lygaeidae—and one of the very 
few in the Heteroptera—found in the Galapagos. It is closely related to 


94 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


D. wenmanensis 


N. usitatus 


O. usingeri 


X. naso 


C. notabilis 


Ficure 3. Spermathecae of the named species. 


Robinsonocoris in the Juan Fernandez Islands, differing principally in features 
correlated with the flightlessness of Robinsonocoris. At the time of the original 
description of Darwinysius for Nysius (2?) marginalis Dallas, it was mentioned 
that a second species had been found on the Galapagos. 


Key TO GALAPAGOS SPECIES OF DARWINYSIUS 


Larger species, male more than 3.2 long, female more than 3.8 long; clothed above with 
short, appressed hairs; vertex of head raised above level of top of eye; Wolf Island — 
Bren oN Ele Te eek D. wenmanensis Ashlock, new species 


VoL, XXXIX] ASHLOCK: GALAPAGOS LYGAEIDAE 95 


Smaller species, male less than 3.1 long, female less than 3.5 long; clothed above with mixed 
erect and appressed hairs; vertex of head not raised above level of top of eye; main islands __ 
_____... D. marginalis (Dallas) 


Darwinysius marginalis (Dallas). 

Nysius (2?) marginalis DALLAS, 1852, p. 556. 

Cymus galapagensis STAL, 1959, p. 252 (synonymy by Butler, 1877). 
Darwinysius marginalis (Dallas), ASHLOCK, 1967, p. 42. 

In the summer of 1964, Dr. R. L. Usinger checked the types of Cymus 
galapagensis Stal and Nysius (?) marginalis Dallas at my request. In Stockholm 
he confirmed Butler’s (1877) synonymy of Stal’s species with that of Dallas, but 
in London, he found Dallas’ series of eight specimens to contain two species: four 
of the eight belonged to Xyonysius naso (Van Duzee). Since Dallas did not 
select a holotype, and no lectotype had since been chosen, Usinger selected the 
best specimen of the remaining four as a lectotype. He wrote that the lectotype 
‘Gs rather broad and well marked and has no antennae.’ The specimen is 
numbered 77—2 (as were the X. aso) and is from Charles Island (Floreana). 
The remaining specimens were from James Island (Santiago) and “were very 
poor and not suitable to be made a lectotype.” The Charles Island specimen 
(no. 77-2) is here formally selected as the lectotype of Nysius (?) marginalis 
Dallas. 

Published records of Darwinysius marginalis are from three islands: Floreana, 
Santiago, and Daphne Major. Members of the G. I. S. P. expedition collected 
well over 300 specimens and can add five islands to the list: Isabella, Fernan- 
dina, Rabida, Pinzon, and Santa Cruz. Almost all of my specimens were collected 
under Portulaca, where they were feeding on fallen seeds of the plant. Dr. 
Usinger collected 55 specimens on Euphorbia viminea at Black Beach, Floreana. 

Darwinysius marginalis is generally similar to D. wenmanensis; differen- 
tiating characters can be found in the key to species. A dorsal view of D. 
marginalis, a side view of the head, and drawings of the aedeagus and sperma- 
theca are given in Ashlock (1967). 


Darwinysius wenmanensis Ashlock, new species. 
(Figures 2, 3.) 


Head elevated above eye about one-third height of eye, sparsely clothed 
with flattened appressed hairs, length 0.71, width 0.80, anteocular length 0.46, 
eye length 0.20, eye width 0.15, interocular space 0.48, buccula widest anteriorly, 
narrow, but not tapering to base of head, slightly projecting past posterior 
point of attachment, not reaching base of head, densely punctate; labium just 
reaching posterior coxae, first segment not reaching posterior end of buccula, 
segment lengths from base 0.46, 0.43, 0.44, 0.32; antenna with flattened sub- 
appressed hairs on first segment, semierect fine hairs on fourth segment, second 


96 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


and third segments intermediate, first segment exceeding clypeus by nearly half 
its length; segment lengths from base 0.39, 0.56, 0.48, 0.41. 

Pronotum with flattened appressed hairs, deeply and densely punctate, cica- 
trices depressed, area anterior to cicatrices somewhat inflated; length 0.78, width 
1.19. Scutellum with vestiture and punctation similar to those of pronotum, 
with a strongly elevated Y-shaped carina, length 0.51, width 0.68. 

Hemelytron exceeding abdomen, clavus and corium moderately dotted with 
appressed hairs, without erect hairs at base of lateral margin, surface overall 
ridged, punctate on both sides of claval suture and outer edge of vein R+M for 
entire length, all veins prominent and elevated, length of claval commissure 0.54, 
length of corium 2.04, apex attaining abdominal segment VII; membrane with 
surface irregularly ridged transversely, veins prominent, basal length to level of 
corial apex 0.90, apical length from corial apex 0.54. 

Color. Head, labium, antenna very dark brown, apices of first to third 
antennal segments and lower edge of buccula pale. Pronotum, scutelum, and 
hemelytron mottled dark and yellowish brown; pronotum with a patch of white 
flattened hairs behind cicatrix, corium with lateral margin alternately light 
and dark, apical margin beyond intersection of vein Cu very dark brown, 
membrane including veins mottled brown and transparent. Ventor dark brown 
except acetabula, posterior lobe of propleura, mesothoracic scent gland, and 
lateral posterior angle of metapleuron pale, legs with femur very dark brown, 
apex pale, tibia and tarsi pale with dark band dorsally and subapically on tibia. 

HototyPe. 6, Wolf Island (Wenman). 31 January, under Portulaca (P. D. 
Ashlock). 

ParATyPeEs. Wolf Island, 15 6,15 2, same data as holotype; 1 4, 24 Septem- 
ber 1906 (F. X. Williams). 

Darwinysius wenmanensis is abundantly distinct from the type species of 
the genus as indicated by characters in the key. Both species are variable in 
color pattern, ranging from nearly immaculate on the clavus and corium to 
quite dark with few pale maculations, but in general D. wenmanensis tends to 
be darker. Such features of both species as the spotted costal margin, the acute 
antenniferous tubercles, the general body shape, and, in D. wenmanensis, the 
raised vertex of the head, make both look very much like miniature Nesoclimacias 
(Hawaiian Islands). This similarity was noted earlier (Ashlock, 1967, p. 35); 
however, I now think these similarities—of Robinsonocoris and Darwinysius 
with the Hawaiian Metrarga, Nesoclimacias, and Nesocryptias—represent 
parallelisms rather than a monophyletic origin. 

Specimens of D. wenmanensis from Wenman Island were the first members 
of the genus I collected, and it was on Wenman that the “under Portulaca” 
habitat of Darwinysius was discovered. Unfortunately, it was then too late to 


VoL. XXXIX |] ASHLOCK: GALAPAGOS LYGAEIDAE 97 


search the Portulaca on Darwin Island (Culpepper), the most remote of the 
archipelago. 


Genus Xyonysius Ashlock and Lattin 
X yonysius ASWLOcCK and LATTIN, 1963, p. 702. 


Xyonysius naso (Van Duzee). 

(Figures 2, 3.) 

Nysius (Ortholomus) naso VAN DUZEE, 1933, p. 27. 

Ortholomus naso (Van Duzee), BARBER, 1934, p. 285. 

Nystus naso Van Duzee, USINGER, 1941, p. 131. 

Xyonystus naso (Van Duzee), ASHLOCK and LATTIN, 1963, p. 702. 

Xyonysius is a New World genus of metragine Orsillinae whose species 
are found from Canada to Argentina and Chile. The endemic Galapagos species 
X. naso is one of the more variable ones, ranging from forms with immaculate 
hemelytra to forms with three irregular dark brown longitudinal stripes on 
the corium, the middle one continuing onto the membrane, and dark brown 
claval apices. Figure 1 shows a specimen with intermediate coloration. This 
variation was found in all series of the species collected, and does not appear 
to be correlated with island or host plant. Unlike X. californicus (Stal), a 
wide-spread North American species found on many composites, X. naso 
seems to be confined to species of the endemic composite genus Scalesia. The 
species was described from a single specimen taken on Floreana (Charles Island). 
Dr. Usinger and I collected 59 specimens on the following islands and host plants: 
Santa Cruz (S. affinis, S. helleri), Fernandina (Scalesia species), Barrington 
(S. helleri), Isabella (S. affinis, S. gummifera), and Floreana (S. affinis). 
Nowhere was the species abundant. 


Genus Cymoninus Breddin 


Cymoninus BREDDIN, 1907, p. 38. 


Cymoninus notabilis (Distant). 

(Figures 3, 4.) 

Ninus notabilis D1isTaNT, 1882, p. 191. 

Cymoninus notabilis (Distant), VAN DUZEE, 1917, p. 163. 

This species is here reported from the Galapagos for the first time. Wide- 
spread, it ranges from the southern United States through Central America and 
the Antilles south to Argentina and Brazil. I collected 55 specimens on Santa 
Cruz Island on the trail north of Academy Bay and Bella Vista at about 1,300 
feet on a sedge identified by Ira Wiggins as Cyperus confertus Swartz. 
D. Q. Cavagnaro also collected a few specimens on Santa Cruz at the Horneman 
Ranch, just north of Bella Vista. This species may be a recent introduction to 
the Galapagos. I collected two specimens in the harbor at Guayaquil, Ecuador, 
at light, on board ship. 


98 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH Ser. 


Genus Pachybrachius Hahn 


Pachybrachius HAHN, 1826, p. 18. 
Orthaea DALLAS, 1852, p. 580. 


Key To GALAPAGOS SPECIES OF PACHYBRACHIUS 


Smaller species, less than 4 long; usually brachypterous; corium with long erect hairs and an 
Oval whitejspot neaainner angle 2 ee P. nesovinctus Ashlock, new species 
Larger species, more than 4 long; never brachypterous, fully winged; corium with short 
appressed hairs and without an oval white spot near inner angle — 


Pachybrachius insularis (Barber). 

(Figure 5.) 

Orthaea insularis BARBER, 1925, p. 246. 

Pachybrachius insularis (Barber), SLATER, 1964, p. 1127. 

Barber’s Galapagos Pachybrachius has been recorded from Isabella, Santiago, 
Baltra, and Santa Cruz Islands. Members of the expedition collected the species 
from all of these but Isabella and Baltra, but also collected it on Fernandina 
and Floreana. Most of the material was collected from lights, though occasional 
specimens were collected from the forest floor. The two specimens from Floreana, 
both females (Kuschel and Usinger, collectors) were unusual, since both had 
the labium extending onto the abdomen. Barber (1925) described the labium 
as “reaching just past intermediate coxae.’” However, labial length in a 
36-specimen sample varied as follows: past front but not to mid coxae, 5 4, 
O 2; between mid coxae, 14 6, 7 2; past mid but not to hind coxae, 3¢, 
4 2: between hind coxae, 0 6, 1 2; behind hind coxae onto abdomen, 0 ¢, 
2 2. This character is clearly variable, and females tend to have the longer 
labia. Although the two females with the longest labia came from the same 
island, there was no other correlation of labial length with island of origin. 


Pachybrachius nesovinctus Ashlock, new species. 
(Figures 4, 5.) 

Head slightly elevated between eyes, densely but shallowly punctate, sparsely 
dotted with inconspicuous subappressed and long erect hairs, length 0.71, 
width 0.75, anteocular length 0.37, eye length 0.17, interocular space 0.44; 
buccula high, short, bucculae joined as a single low carina at level of antenniferous 
tubercle; labium not quite reaching mid coxae, first segment not reaching base 
of head, segment lengths from base 0.44, 0.44, 0.27, 0.29; antenna with first 
segment exceeding clypeus by nearly half its length, segment lengths from base 
0.34, 0.63, 0.49, 0.94 (fourth segment drawn too thick in figure 3). 

Pronotum with sparse short subappressed hairs and long erect fine hairs, with 
a single transverse row of widely spaced shallow small punctures on collar, 


VoL. XXXIX] ASHLOCK: GALAPAGOS LYGAEIDAE 99 


fi 

f 

ye Kj 
ih 


Cymoninus  notabilis Pachybrachius nesovinctus 


Ficure 4. Dorsal views of the named species, and anterior view of fore femur of the 
holotype of P. nesovinctus. 


and similar punctures scattered over posterior lobe, length 0.83, collar length 
0.09, width 0.56, anterior lobe length 0.29, width 0.88; divisions between collar 
and two lobes very distinct, anterior lobe globular. Scutellum with vestiture 
and punctation like those of hind lobe of pronotum; length 0.46, width 0.46. 
Brachypterous, hemelytron reaching midway onto abdominal segment VI, 
clavus and corium with surface subshining, vestiture as in pronotum and 
scutellum, clavus with three linear rows of punctures and a confused fourth 
row between medial and scutellar rows, corium with two linear rows of punctures 


100 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


P. nesovinetus 


le, 


insularis 


Ficure 5. Spermathecae of the named species. 


VoL. XXXIX] ASHLOCK: GALAPAGOS LYGAEIDAE 101 


paralleling claval suture, randomly punctate laterally, with a few punctures 
posterior to level of apex of clavus; length of claval commissure 0.31, length of 
corium 1.36; membrane dull, veins not visible, basal length to level of corial 
apex 0.63, apical length from corial apex 0.07. 

Fore femur armed beneath with spines in two ranks as figured (fig. 4); fore 
tibia unarmed, slightly curved. 

Color. Head black, clypeus and juga dark reddish brown, antenna, buccula, 
and labium light yellowish brown. Pronotum black, collar anteriorly pale, 
posterior lobe reddish brown with dark median line. Hemelytron with clavus and 
corium light yellowish brown, punctures reddish brown, corium with white spot 
in inner angle and the black apical margin of P. vinctus group. Venter dark with 
anterior and posterior margins of propleuron, acetabula, scent gland auricle, 
and metapleural plate pale. Abdomen ventrally and dorsally dark reddish 
brown. Legs light yellowish brown, fore femur dark brown except apically. 

Hototyree. ¢, Santa Cruz Island, grassland, 2,100 ft., north of Academy 
Bay, 20 February (P. D. Ashlock). 

PaRATYPES. Santa Cruz Island, 10 ¢, 12 2, same data as holotype; 1 
(macropterous), Table Mountain, 440 m., 16 April (D. Q. Cavagnaro). 
Fernandina Island, 1 2, southwest side, 1,000 ft., 4 February (P. D. Ashlock). 

This description adds another species to the confusing Pachybrachius vinctus 
complex, which badly needs revision. The new species is distinct in having 
long erect hairs on the dorsum. The New World P. vinctus (Say) and the 
closely related Pacific P. pacificus (Stal) both have small, inconspicuous 
appressed hairs on the dorsum. Pachybrachius nesovinctus is usually found 
in the brachypterous state (only one macropterous specimen has been collected), 
as are many populations of P. pacificus from the western and central Pacific. 
Brachypterous forms are less common in the Western Hemisphere species P. vinc- 
tus. The Galapagos species show more brown on the hemelytron than do speci- 
mens of P. vinctus from the North and South American mainlands. 


Genus Heraeus Stal 
Heraeus STAL, 1862, p. 315. 


Heraeus pacificus Barber. 
(Figure 5.) 


Heraeus pacificus BARBER, 1925, p. 21. 


Barber described this species from Santiago, and it has previously been 
recorded only from this island. Members of the expedition collected it in large 
numbers from Santa Cruz, and a single specimen was collected from Floreana. 
Many of the specimens were collected at light between Academy Bay and the 
Horneman Ranch on Santa Cruz, and I collected a large series in the so-called 
grassland area of the island at 1,800 feet under Jaegeria hirta. 


102 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH Serr. 


LITERATURE CITED 


ASHLOCK, P. D. 

1967. A generic classification of the Orsillinae of the world (Hemiptera—Heteroptera: 
Lygaeidae). University of California Publications in Entomology, vol. 48; 
pp. 1-82. 

AsHLock, P. D., and J. D. Lattin. 

1963. Stridulatory mechanisms in the Lygaeidae, with a new American genus of 
Orsillinae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of 
America, vol. 56, pp. 693-703. 

Baker, C. F. 

1906. Notes on the Nysius and Ortholomus of America. Invertebrata Pacifica, 

vol. 1, pp. 133-140. 
Barser, H. G. 

1925. Hemiptera-Heteroptera from the Williams Galapagos expedition. Zoologica, vol. 
5, pp. 241-254. 

1934. The Norwegian zoological expedition to the Galapagos Islands 1925, conducted by 
Alf Wollebaek. XI. Hemiptera—Heteroptera. Nyt Magazin for Naturvidens 
kaberne, vol. 74, pp. 281-289. 

BreEpDDIN, G. 

1907. Berytiden and Myodochiden von Ceylon aus der Sammelausbeute von Dr. W. 

Horn (Rhynch. het). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 1907, pp. 34-47. 
Butter, A. G. 

1877. Account of the zoological collection made during the visit of H.M.S. “Petrel’” 
to the Galapagos Islands. X. Lepidoptera, Orthoptera, Hemiptera. Proceedings 
of the Zoological Society, London 1877, pp. 86-91. 

CarRVALHO, J. C. M., and W. C. Gacne. 

1968. Miridae of the Galapagos Islands (Heteroptera). Proceedings of the California 

Academy of Sciences, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 147-219. 
DALLAs, W. S. 

1852. List of the specimens of hemipterous insects in the collection of the British 

Museum, London, Pts. I and II. 592 pp. 
Distant, W. L. 

1880-1893. Insecta. Rhynchota. Hemiptera-Heteroptera. Vol. I. Biologia Centrali- 

Americana. xx + 462 pp. 36 pls. 
DRAKE, C. J., and R. C. FROESCHNER. 

1967. Lace bugs of the Galapagos Archipelago (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Proceedings of 

the Entomological Society of Washington, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 82-91. 
FROESCHNER, R. C. 

1968. Burrower bugs from the Galapagos Islands collected by the 1964 expedition of the 
Galapagos Scientific Project (Hemiptera: Cydnidae). Proceedings of the 
Entomological Society of Washington, vol. 70, no. 2, p. 192. 

Hann, C. W. 
1826. Icones ad monographium Cimicum. Nurnberg, Lechner. 
HERRING, J. L. 

1966. The Anthocoridae of the Galapagos and Cocos islands (Hemiptera). Proceedings 

of the Entomological Society of Washington, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 127-130. 
KERZHNER, I. M. 

1968. Insects of the Galapagos Islands (Heteroptera, Nabidae). Proceedings of the 

California Academy of Sciences, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 85-91. 


VoL. XXXIX] ASHLOCK: GALAPAGOS LYGAEIDAE 103 


LINSLEY, E. G., and R. L. USINGER. 
1966. Insects of the Galapagos Islands. Proceedings of the California Academy of 
Sciences, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 113-196. 
MacArruur, R. H., and E. O. Wison. 
1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University 
Press. xi + 203 pp. 
PoLHEMUS, J. T. 
1968a. A report on the Saldidae collected by the Galapagos International Scientific 
Project 1964 (Hemiptera). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of 
Washington, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 21-24. 
1968b. A new Microvelia from the Galapagos (Hemiptera: Veliidae). Proceedings 
of the Entomological Society of Washington, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 129-132. 


SLATER, J. A. 
1964. A catalogue of the Lygaeidae of the world. Storrs, University of Connecticut. 
1,668 pp. 
Span, (C- 


1859. Hemiptera species novas descriptsit. Konglika Svenska Fregattens Eugenies resa 
omkring jorden. III (Zoologi, Insecter) 1859, pp. 219-298. 
1862. Hemiptera Mexicana enumeravit speciesque novas_ descripsit. Stettiner 
Entomologische Zeitung, vol. 23, pp. 81-118; 273-281; 289-325; 437-462. 
1872. Genera Lygaeidarum Europae disposuit. Ofversigt af K. Vetenskaps-akademiens 
for handlingar, Stockholm vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 37-62. 
Usincer, R. L. 
1941. The present status and synonymy of some orsilline species (Hemiptera, Lygaeidae). 
Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society, vol. 36, pp. 129-132. 
Van DuzeE, E. P. 
1917. Catalogue of the Hemiptera of America north of Mexico. University of 
California Publications in Entomology, vol. 2, i-xiv, 1-902. 
1933. The Templeton Crocker expedition of the California Academy of Sciences, 
1934. No. 4. Characters of twenty-four new species of Hemiptera from the 
Galapagos Islands and the coast islands of Central America and Mexico. 
Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 25-40. 
Viriters, A. 
1970. Les Emesines des Iles Galapagos (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Jn: Mission 
zoologique belge aus iles Galapagos et en Ecuador (N. et J. Leleup, 1964-1965), 
vol. 2, pp. 227-237. 


8 TTP | ’ Leg) 7 A 
i he ais 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 9, pp. 105-110. September 5, 1972 


A NEW LIZARD OF THE GENUS EMOIA 
(SCINCIDAE) FROM THE MARIANAS ISLANDS 


By 
Walter C. Brown 


Menlo College, Menlo Park, California, and Division of Systematic Biology, 
Stanford University. Research Associate, Department of Herpetology, 
California Academy of Sciences. 


and 


Marjorie V. C. Falanruw 


University of Guam, Territory of Guam. 


INTRODUCTION 


Brown (1956) recognized eight species of the Papuan-Oriental genus of 
lizards, Emoia, as occurring in Micronesia. Two were noted as apparently 
undescribed, of which one, a moderate-sized species, was represented by only 
four specimens from the Marianas Islands in the northwestern part of Micro- 
nesia. One of us (the junior author) has recently obtained a large series of 
the species from the same island group, and this larger sample permits a more 
adequate diagnosis of the species. It apparently has its closest affinities 
with Emoia boettgeri (Sternfeld) from central and eastern Micronesia and with 
Emoia arnoensis Brown and Marshall from the Marshall Islands in eastern 
Micronesia. Emoia atrocostata (Lesson), a widely distributed species-complex 
in the western Pacific basin; Emoia flavigularis Schmidt from the Solomon 
Islands to the south; and the very large Emoia nigra Jacquinot and Guichenot, 
the range of which extends from the Solomon to the Tonga Islands in the southern 
Island chain, are also representatives of the same evolutionary group. 

Measurements were made with a caliper to the nearest 0.1 mm. Middorsal 
scale rows were counted between the parietals and a point opposite the vent; 


[105] 


arine Biological Laboratory 
LIBRARY 
erp 15 1972 


[Proc 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


106 


r} 
ages 
oe 

S 


ve 
Ly) 
eee: 


¢ 

A 
4 

bs 


Sy 


Ss 


=: 


ME 
Fx 


=: 


i 


ee 


nome 


aes 


ao! 


Vor. XXXIX] BROWN & FALANRUW: A NEW SPECIES OF EMOIA 107 


midbody scale rows at a point approximately equidistant between the fore and 
hind limbs; fourth-toe lamellae from that proximal rounded lamella which is 
at least two-thirds the breadth of the toe to the most distal ventral scale inclusive. 


Emoia slevini Brown and Falanruw, new species. 


Hototyre. United States National Museum no. 192781, Cocos Island (a 
small island off the southern end of Guam), Marianas Islands, collected by 
M. V. C. Falanruw. 

PaRATYPES. United States National Museum nos. 122645-122646, Rota 
Island; 122470, Ritidain Point, Guam Island, collected by L. P. McElroy; 
128028, Mt. Lasso, Tinian Islands, collected by H. K. Townes, Jr.; University 
of Guam nos. 547-552, 1305-1306, 1393-1395, 1448, 1450-1451; California 
Academy of Sciences nos. 129138—-129143; Museum of Comparative Zoology, 
Harvard University no. 128164; Field Museum of Natural History no. 171832; 
and British Museum of Natural History no. 1971.1027, from the same locality 
as the holotype. 

Dracnosis. An Emoia species of moderately large size, 58-85 mm. in 
snout-vent length for 18 mature specimens; length of hind limb less than 50 
percent of the snout-vent length; simply rounded lamellae on under surface of 
digits, numbering 30-37 beneath the longest toe; 34-38 midbody scale rows and 
61—74 dorsal scale rows between parietals and base of tail (for a sample of 27 
specimens); prefrontals separated by the frontal; frontoparietals distinct; 
interparietal moderate in size; ground color (in life) of dorsum and upper 
lateral surfaces light to dark brown with variable scattered dark and light 
flecks. 

DeEscriPpTION. An Emoia species of moderate size; snout-vent length of 6 
mature females 63-75 mm., of 12 males 69-84 mm.; snout round-pointed, of 
moderate length (36-44 percent of head length); supranasals much broader 
anteriorly than posteriorly, in contact with the anterior loreal which is shorter 
and broader than the posterior; prefrontals not in contact (separated by the 
frontal which is in contact with the rostral); length of the frontal about equal 
to that of the fused frontoparietals; interparietal of moderate size, length 
about equal to breadth at the base to nearly one and one-half times as great; 
4 or 5 supralabials anterior to the enlarged one beneath orbit; 4 supraoculars plus 
a small one posteriorly; a single pair of large nuchals (fig. 1), dorsal scales 
smooth; midbody scale rows 34-38 for twenty-eight specimens; transverse 
rows along the middorsal line from parietals to base of tail 61-74; number of 
rows across the nape from ear to ear 12; 30-37 smooth, rounded lamellae 


< 
Ficure 1. Emoia slevini. a. Lateral view of head of paratype; b. Dorsal view of head of 
paratype, CAS. 


Biological Laboratory 


LIBRARY 
SEP 15 1972 


Marine 


[Proc. 47TH Ser. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


108 


£7 07 8 9 ST N 
Orr'0 €cS 0 €cS'0 6870 O8r'0 W 
T8+0 LSS°0 Oss'O sTs0 cso qjSue] JU9A-yNous 
—£0+'0 -9LV'0 -L6+'0 -8S+'0 —cer'o u /quily pury jo yywueT 
suowtoeds 
8I Os 9 £7 9 v LT N ~ 
= ainyeul JO (“Wwu) 
S8-8S VIT-SL TZ-8$ CL-S& s9-09 88-19 S8—L9 ud 
Y}sue] JUAA-JNOoUs 
Lé £C 6 CC 8 L 17 N qrey 
299 Te9 Oss 6149 8°89 £99 STL W JO aseq 0} spejatied 
VLNO 99-09 c9-98 LL-S9 vL-S9 OL-¥9 vL-L9 u UWLOAT SMOT V[BIS 
LC eC 6 £7 6 L 1Z N 
sts ore i 4 97¢h TLv gee 6¢ W 
Le-0¢ Se-Te vy-8e Sb-6¢ CS-SY Se-Te Ty-Se u sel[9We] 90}-YJANOY 
Lé GC 8 £C 6 L 1Z N 
S9E TLE OLE C8e V8e 66¢ ese W 
8t-ve Or-Ce OV-SE Or-Se Ov-9E Or-6¢ Cv9S ua SMOI a[eIS APOQpIyAL 
minays DABIU SLUDINSIADp SypqUats10 1498 190Q DIDJSOIOAJD — SISUBOUAD slaqeIeYy) 
a a a Oh GI Uh GL a a 


(suamigags {0 4aqunu = Ay ‘upam = py ‘adudA = Y) TWIAVS BIOWY 07 paznjad Sa19ags AOf SJuaMadANsDaUt JUuaUIJAag PUD SJUNOI a[DIS “| ATAVL, 


Vor. XXXIX] BROWN & FALANRUW: A NEW SPECIES OF EMOIA 109 


beneath the fourth toe for 27 specimens; limbs rather well developed, but hind 
limb less than 50 percent of the snout-vent length (table 1) and usually slightly 
less than distance from axilla to groin. 

Cotor. The ground color dorsally (in life) is irridescent medium brown 
to dark brown with some darker flecks and occasionally light flecks, limbs, 
especially the hind limbs, often lighter with more numerous flecks; venter 
whitish to gray or cream anteriorly, more yellow posteriorly, sometimes orange 
about the vent; in recently preserved specimens the ground color is brown or 
somewhat reddish brown with scattered darker markings, in some specimens 
forming a vague pattern of narrow, broken, transverse bands. The yellow and 
orange of the venter fade rapidly in preservative. 

EtymoLocy. The species is named for Mr. Joseph R. Slevin, former Curator 
of Amphibians and Reptiles at the California Academy of Sciences. 

ComPARISONS. Emoia slevini is probably most closely related to Emoia 
boettgert which occurs in the Caroline Islands. The two species are very 
similar in color pattern, but F. slevini differs from the latter primarily in 
the much lower number of subdigital lamellae, 31-38 (mean = 33) for 27 
specimens, instead of 45-52 (mean = 47) for 6 specimens of Emoia b. boettgeri 
from the Caroline Islands, and the somewhat shorter hind limbs relative to snout- 
vent length, less than 50 percent (usually greater than 50 percent for EF. boett- 
geri). Emoia arnoensis and E. flavigularis are also readily distinguished from 
E. slevini not only on the basis of very different color patterns, but also by the 
higher subdigital lamellar counts; for E. flavigularis the number of scale rows 
between the parietals and the base of the tail is usually less than 65, whereas 
it is usually greater than 65 for E. slevini; and the interparietal is usually fused 
with the parietals in E. flavigularis, or, if distinct, relatively small. 

Of the group of related species noted in the Introduction, only £. atrocostata 
is sympatric with E. slevini. Populations of both species are represented in 
collections from Cocos Island, with 23 examples of E. slevini and two of E. 
atrocostata. Unfortunately this widespread species, described by Lesson (1830) 
on the basis of a unique specimen from Oualan (= Kusaie) Island in the 
eastern Carolines, is still poorly represented in collections from most islands 
of Micronesia and probably does not occur in the Marshall Islands, at least 
in the eastern part. The data for E. atrocostata presented in this paper are 
based upon two examples from Cocos Island and several specimens from Ulithi 
Atoll and the Palau Islands. Using the limited data from these two small 
samples of E. atrocostata, aside from totally unlike color patterns, E. atrocostata 
would appear to be most readily distinguished from £. slevini on the basis of 
the slightly greater number of midbody scale rows (table 1); the longer, 
narrower interparietal (length one and one-half to two times its basal breadth) ; 
and the posteriorly more broadly truncate rostral. 


110 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Hasitat. Based on observations of the population on Cocos Island, E£. 
slevini is a forest species. The forest on this island is predominantly tall Casuar- 
ina trees with some scattered coconut and other broadleaf trees. The understory 
growth is sparse and the canopy permits only diffuse sunlight to mottle the 
forest floor. The forested area is bordered toward the lagoon by Scaevola shrubs. 
Most of the lizards observed were active on the forest floor. Occasionally 
specimens were seen in low hollows of tree trunks with only their heads protrud- 
ing. Two were observed on the lower part of the trunk of Casuarina trees. 
In most instances escape was attempted by hiding under material on the forest 
floor. A few specimens were observed at the edges of the Scaevola shrubs. 

Emoia atrocostata on Cocos Island, as elsewhere (Brown and Alcala, 1967), 
occupies the various marginal beach areas or the open, often sparsely grassy 
or shrub-dotted areas adjacent to the beaches. 


KEY TO THE SPECIES OF EMOIA IN THE MARIANAS 


1. Lamellae beneath the fourth toe greatly thinned, more than 50 E. cyanura 
Lamellae) rounded; not’ thinned, less than’ 50) =e 2 
. Midscale rows between the parietals and the base of tail less than 60; maturity attained 
ae CH) ienbont, ie JESS tin, Selanne |esayetday Pt E. caeruleocauda 
Middorsal scale rows between the parietals and ihe. base of tail greater than 60; maturity 
not attained at less than 45 mm., rarely less than 50 mm., in snout-vent length 3 
3. Midbody scale rows 38 to 40; rostral broadly truncate posteriorly; dorsum grayish, 
greenish, or tan with black or dark brown spots; upper lateral surface marked by 
iresular black vor Ganrke frown" bere ee E. atrocostata 
Midbody scale rows 34 to 38; rostral rounded or narowly truncate posteriorly; dorsal 
and upper lateral surfaces brownish with scattered darker markings occasionally forming 


bo 


a vague pattern of narrow, broken, transverse bands —_..____»_»___ E. slevini 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


This study is part of the senior author’s program concerned with the herpeto- 
fauna of the Pacific Islands with emphasis on the Philippines. The latter 
program is currently supported by National Science Foundation Grant GB- 
16972. Illustrations were prepared by Mr. Walter Zawojski, Stanford University. 


LITERATURE CITED 


Brown, WALTER C. 
1956. The distribution of terrestrial reptiles in the islands of the Pacific basin. 
Proceedings of the Eighth Pacific Science Congress, vol. 3, pp. 1479-1491. 
Brown, WALTER C., and ANGEL C. ALCALA 
1967. Population ecology of the tropical scincoid lizard, Emoza atrocostata, in the 
Philippines. Copeia, 1967, pp. 596-604. 
Lesson, R. P. 
1830. Zoologie: In M. L. I. Duperry, Voyage autour du monde .. . sur la 
corvette de sa Majeste, La Coquille, pendant les années 1822-1825. Paris, 
vol. 4, 743 pp. and 157 pls. 


Marine B 
LIBRARY 
JAN® 1973 
Woods Hole, Mass, 


PROCEEDINGS 


‘ological Laboratory 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 10, pp. 111-120; 5 figs. December 27, 1972 


TWO NEW GENERA AND TWO NEW SPECIES 
OF WESTERN PACIFIC SNAKE-EELS 
(APODES: OPHICHTHIDAE) 


ey) 
John E. McCosker! 


Scripps Institution of Oceanography 
La Jolla, California 92037 


ABSTRACT. Two new species representing two new genera of ophichthid eels, sub- 
family Ophichthinae, are described from the western Pacific Ocean. Evips 
percinctus, from Palau, and Allips concolor, from Thailand, are described and 
figured. 


INTRODUCTION 


Examination of the extensive collections of Indo-Pacific fishes deposited 
at the California Academy of Sciences has disclosed the presence of two new 
species of ophichthid eels, subfamily Ophichthinae, each of which is distinctly 
different from any member of a known genus. Difficulty in obtaining specimens 
of sand-dwelling eels has been noted in recent works (McCosker and Rosen- 
blatt, 1972), yet the two individuals upon which this report is based represent 
but a small fraction of the numerous ophichthids, moringuids, and xenocongrids 
collected by the George Vanderbilt and Naga expeditions to the central and 
western Pacific Ocean. It is the author’s intent in this study to make these 
generic names available in preparation for his more thorough osteological 
comparison of genera within the family Ophichthidae. 

Measurements are straight-line, made either with a 300 mm. ruler with 


1Contribution from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego. 


Tilia] 


112 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


[Proc. 4TH Serr. 


a aU ee iy id 
JANG 1973 
Wosds Hole, Mass. 
Vor. XXXIX] McCOSKER: NEW SNAKE EELS a | ee 
0.5 mm. gradations (for total length, trunk length, and tail length) and 
recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm., or with dial calipers (all other measurements) 
and recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm. Head length is measured from the snout 
tip to the posterodorsal margin of the gill opening; trunk length is taken 
from the end of the head to mid-anus; body depth does not include the fin. 
Branchiostegal and vertebral counts (which include the hypural) were made 
using radiographs. Gill arches were prepared by means of the Taylor (1967) 
trypsin technique. Material used in this study is housed in the California 
Academy of Sciences (CAS) or the Marine Vertebrates Collection of the Scripps 
Institution of Oceanography. 
I thank Richard H. Rosenblatt for reading this manuscript critically, 
Carl L. Hubbs for suggestions, and William N. Eschmeyer of the California 
Academy of Sciences for permission to utilize specimens in his care. 


TAXONOMY 
Evips McCosker, new genus 


Driacnosis. Body nearly cylindrical, head and trunk longer than tail. 
Dorsal and anal low, ending before pointed tail tip; dorsal origin above and 
slightly behind gill openings. Pectoral rudimentary and less than eye dia- 
meter, its base in upper corner of gill opening. Gill openings lateral and 
shorter than isthmus breadth. Underside of snout not grooved. Anterior 
nostril tubular, posterior nostrils open into mouth. Teeth pointed; inter- 
maxillary teeth largest and depressible, vomerine teeth smaller and_ fixed. 
Eye large. Other characters those of the single species. 

Type species. Evips percinctus McCosker, new species. 

EtymMotocy. From the Greek «i (eu, latinized to ev for euphony before a 
vowel), good, and iy (ips, masculine), a worm, in reference to the general 
appearance of this charming eel. 

RELATIONSHIPS. Evips percinctus appears most closely related to the more 
generalized ophichthines such as species of Ophichthus, Microdonophis, and 
Pogonophis. Similarities among these genera include the retention of the 
pectoral and median fins, the lateral slightly restricted gill opening, the 
posterior nostril and head pore conditions, and the generally bold coloration. 
Osteologically, E. percinctus also appears similar to them in its pectoral 
girdle and hyoid arch conditions (viewed from radiographs and cleared and 
stained specimens) and in the condition of the gill arches, primarily the 
retention of the fifth ceratobranchial and the separation of UP; and UP, 


< 


Ficure 1. Evips percinctus McCosker, new species, CAS no. 13966, holotype, 125.5 
mm. TL. Arrows indicate the origin and termination of the median fins. 


114 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 2. Evips percinctus McCosker, new species, CAS no. 13966, holotype. Arrows 
indicate location of median interorbital and temporal pores. 


(Nelson, 1966; personal observation). The new genus is separable from 
these and other ophichthines on the basis of its rudimentary pectoral fin, 
robust body, and short tail. 


Evips percinctus McCosker, new species. 
(Figures 1-3.) 

Holotype and only known specimen, CAS no. 13966, a 125.5 mm. juvenile 
from Kayangel Island, Palau Islands, Southern Caroline Archipelago 
(8°02’18’N., 134°43’21”E.), collected in shallow water (0-4”) by H. A. 
Fehlmann and party during the George Vanderbilt Foundation 1956 Palau 
Islands Expedition, on 8 October 1956. 

DESCRIPTION. (Measurements are in millimeters.) Total length 125.5, 
head 14.0, trunk 60.0, tail 51.5, predorsal 17.2, body depth behind gill 
opening 5.2, at anus 4.5, snout length 2.8, upper jaw 4.8, eye diameter 1.4, 
interorbital width 1.5, gill opening height 0.9, isthmus width 3.1. Vertebrae 
132; 69 to anal fin origin. 

Body stout (not exceedingly elongate as in many ophichthids) and nearly 
cylindrical. Depth behind gill openings 24 times in total length, and at 
anus 28; width behind gill openings 31 times in total length, and at anus 
34. Snout blunt. Lower jaw included, its tip beneath a line drawn from 
anterior nostril base. Eye large, about 3.4 times in upper jaw, its center 
opposite midpoint of upper jaw. Anterior nostrils tubular, about 1.5 in eye 
diameter. Posterior nostrils open into mouth and lie ahead of anterior margin 
of eye. Tongue adnate. Branchial basket expanded and supported by numerous 
branchiostegals and jugostegalia which broadly overlap along the ventral 
midline. Numerous papillae on snout, beneath eye, and on anterolateral 
flanges of upper lip (fig. 2). Dorsal origin above and slightly behind gill 


VoL. XXXIX] McCOSKER: NEW SNAKE EELS 115 


Ficure 3. Dentition of holotype of Evips percinctus McCosker, new species. 


opening. Pectoral fin rudimentary, a small semicircular flap, about equal 
in length to anterior nostril and attached above midpoint of gill opening. 
Dorsal and anal low, disappearing in advance of tail tip. Caudal rays 
lacking. 

Head pores conspicuous; preoperculomandibular, temporal, suborbital, 
postorbital, and supraorbital series present (fig. 2). A single median inter- 
orbital and temporal pore. Two postocular pores, lying within faintly pig- 


116 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


mented spots. Left lateral line pores 125; 9 before gill opening and 73 
before the anus, terminating 0.3 head length before tail tip. 

Teeth pointed and depressible (fig. 3). Four anterior peripheral inter- 
maxillary teeth covered by skin folds, flanking a median intermaxillary pair, 
followed by seven uniserial vomerine teeth. Maxillary teeth biserial, the 
outer row covered by a skin fold and larger anteriorly, the inner 4 prom- 
inent. Mandibular teeth uniserial, about 10 on each side and grading smaller 
posteriorly. 

Gill arches removed, and cleared and stained. First basibranchial os- 
sified, second cartilaginous, third rudimentary, fourth absent. Hypobranch- 
ials 1 and 2 ossified, 3 cartilaginous. Ceratobranchials 1—5 ossified, the 
fifth a slender filament. Second and third infrapharyngobranchials ossified. 
Lower pharyngeal tooth plate slender with about 25 conical biserial teeth. 
Upper pharyngeal tooth plate (UP; and UP, of Nelson, 1966) separate 
(unfused) and subrectangular, with about 15 conical teeth. 

Color in isopropanol yellow, overlain dorsally with 16 brown saddles. 
First saddle just behind occiput, does not reach sides of head; remaining 
15 extend below lateral midline but do not meet ventrally. The type has 
retained traces of larval pigmentation, visible as 9 minute black pigment 
patches evenly spaced along the ventral midline of the trunk. Median fins 
unpigmented. 

EtymoLocy. From Latin, signifying banded throughout. 


Allips McCosker, new genus 


Dtacnosis. Body very elongate, nearly cylindrical for most of its length; 
head and trunk longer than tail. Dorsal and anal low and lying within a 
shallow groove, ending before bluntly pointed tail tip; dorsal origin well 
behind gill openings. Pectoral rudimentary, a tiny flap in upper rear corner 
of gill opening. Gill openings lateral and low on sides, separated by an 
isthmus wider than their length. Underside of snout grooved. Jaw teeth 
and vomerine teeth small and pointed. Eye minute. Other characters those 
of the single species. 

Type species. Allips concolor McCosker, new species. 

Etymo.ocy. From the Greek adAos (allos), another, and iy (ips, masculine), 
a worm. 

RELATIONSHIPS. Allips concolor appears most similar to extant species of 
Bascanichthys, Phaenomonas, and Gordiichthys. The last is a poorly known 
ophichthid excluded from the recent generic treatment of Rosenblatt and 
McCosker (1970). It will be redescribed on the basis of new material by 
James E. Bohlke (personal communication). Allips differs from Bascanichthys 
in having a more posterior dorsal fin origin, a more rounded snout, and 
a more cylindrical trunk and tail. The two genera are quite similar in having 


Vor. XXXIX] McCOSKER: NEW SNAKE EELS 117 


Ficure 4. Head of holotype of Allips concolor McCosker, new species, CAS 13967, 
375 mm. TL. 


small nearly fixed teeth, comparable gill arch configurations (although the 
fifth ceratobranchial, absent in Adlips, is very reduced but retained in certain 
species of Bascanichthys), low crescentic gill openings, rudimentary pectoral 
fins, a grooved snout, reduced eyes, highly rugose skin regions, a nearly 
uniform coloration (although certain species of Bascanichthys are often darkly 
pigmented dorsally), and similar head and body shapes and _ proportions. 
Phaenomonas differs in its extreme dorsal fin reduction, complete loss of 
the pectoral and anal fins, smaller eye, and the elongation of the trunk 
region. 


Allips concolor McCosker, new species. 
(Figures 4-5.) 


Holotype and only known specimen, CAS no. 13967, a 375 mm. specimen 
from Goh Phi, Ranong Province, Thailand (10°57’42’”N., 98°35'18”E.), 
north of Ban Parknam Ranong. Collected in shallow water (0-3) at the 
mouth of Pakehan river by H. A. Fehlmann and party during the 1959-1961 
Naga Expedition, on 1 June 1960. 

DESCRIPTION. (Measurements are in millimeters.) Total length 375, 
head 21.0, trunk 205, tail 149, predorsal 48, body depth behind gill openings 
5.6, at anus 5.0, snout length 3.0, upper jaw 5.2, eye diameter 0.6, interorb- 
ital width 2.6, gill opening height 1.7, isthmus width 2.6. Vertebrae 174; 
96 to anal fin origin. 

Body elongate and nearly cylindrical, becoming laterally compressed only 
near tail tip. Depth behind gill openings 67 times in total length, and at 
anus 75; width behind gill openings 83 times in total length, and at anus 
86. Snout subconical, rounded at tip. Lower jaw included, its tip behind 
anterior nostrils. Eye small, 8.5 in upper jaw, and faintly visible under 
skin; its midpoint closer to corner of mouth than snout tip. Anterior 


118 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


\ 


busy 


a 


Ficure 5. Dentition of holotype of Allips concolor McCosker, new species. 


nostrils in a short tube; posterior nostrils open into mouth beneath eye. 
Tongue adnate. Branchial basket expanded and supported by 21 pairs of 
branchiostegals and jugostegalia which broadly overlap along ventral midline. 
Sides of head, throat, chin, and body flanks markedly rugose. Dorsal fin 
origin well behind gill openings. Pectoral fin rudimentary, a small flap 
attached to upper rear margin of gill opening. Dorsal and anal fins low, 
lying within a groove and disappearing 0.85 head length before finless caudal 
tip. The median and posterior caudal edges are covered with a band of 
numerous small papillae. 

Head pores reduced, but preoperculomandibular, temporal, suborbital, 


VoL. XXXIX] McCOSKER: NEW SNAKE EELS 119 


postorbital, and supraorbital series present (fig. 4). A single median inter- 
orbital and temporal pore. Lateral line canal and pores present, but impossible 
to discern because of their reduced state and a waxy precipitate which has 
formed in preservation. 

Teeth small, pointed, and close set (fig. 5). Jaw teeth and posterior 
vomerine teeth uniserial. 

Gill arches removed, and cleared and stained. First basibranchial os- 
sified, second cartilaginous, third absent, fourth cartilaginous but rudimentary. 
Hypobranchials 1 and 2 ossified, 3 cartilaginous. Ceratobranchials 1—4 os- 
sified, 5 absent. Second and third infrapharyngobranchials ossified. Upper 
and lower pharyngeal tooth plates are subrectangular patches with conical 
teeth; UPs and UP, separate. 

Color in isopropanol nearly uniform brown although slightly darker on 
upper half due to small dark punctations. 

EtymoLtocy. From Latin, in reference to the nearly uniform coloration. 


LITERATURE CITED 


McCosker, JoHN E., and R1icHarp H. ROSENBLATT 
1972. Eastern Pacific snake-eels of the genus Callechelys (Apodes: Ophichthidae). 
Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History, vol. 17, no. 2, 
pp. 15-24, 5 figs. 
NELSON, GARETH J. 
1966. Gill arches of teleostean fishes of the order Anguilliformes. Pacific Science, 
vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 391-408, 58 figs. 
ROSENBLATT, RicHarD H., and Joun E. McCosker 
1970. A key to the genera of the ophichthid eels, with descriptions of two new 
genera and three new species from the eastern Pacific. Pacific Science, vol. 
24, no. 4, pp. 494-505, 8 figs. 
TayiLor, WILLIAM RALPH 
1967. An enzyme method of clearing and staining small vertebrates. Proceedings of 
the United States National Museum, vol. 122, no. 3596, 17 pp. 


PROCEEDINGS 0005 Hole, Vase. 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 11, pp. 121-140; 6 figs.; 3 tables. December 27, 1972 


FIVE NEW INDO-PACIFIC PIPEFISHES 


By 


Earl S. Herald 
Steinhart Aquarium, California Academy of Sciences 
San Francisco, California 94118 


and 


John E. Randall 
Bernice P. Bishop Museum, P.O. Box 6037 
Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 


During the 1946 fish investigations at Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands, 
V. E. Brock and Herald carried out the first moderate-depth rotenone stations 
for the collection of fishes. Since this was before the development of scuba, 
the diving gear consisted of Brock’s modified Monson lung rebreather with 
other divers receiving air supplied through a standard dive line attached to 
a small compressor. It was soon evident from these collections that an 
important break occurred in the vertical distribution of the fishes. Many 
were confined to the intertidal zone or a few feet below; others were common 
in water of about 15 feet or greater and rarely, if ever, were seen in 
shallow water. The Syngnathidae provided a good example of this faunal 
break. Of the ten species of pipefishes (47 specimens from 26 stations) 
which were collected in the Marshall Islands, five were found only at 
depths below 15 feet, and three of those were undescribed. 

With the exception of Dentirostrum janssi, the other four species of pipe- 
fishes described as new herein appear to belong to the deeper water group, 
being taken at depths ranging from 20 to 160 feet. One species was 
collected in the Hawaiian Islands, one in the Marianas, the third in the 


[121] 


122 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


TABLE 1. Meristic comparisons for the Dunckerocampus complex. 


Num- Trunk 
ber of Rings Tail Rings Dorsal Fin Rays 
eee 15) 16117 16) 7 18 19: 20) 20) 22 2320022023678 550 
Dunckerocampus 
multiannulatus* g* ipa i fF il 1? Seas 
D. pessuliferus 1 1 1 1 
D. c. caulleryi 1 1 1 1 
D. c. chapmani 3 I 2 LZ: ih 
D. dactyliophorus 59 1 58 10 37 10 2 21318 14 8 5 
D. baldwini 20 20 Wo @ 1 ey 2 2 
Dentirostrum janssi 34 34 1 426 3 1 3 16 14 


‘Includes literature holotype data for D. multiannulatus and D. ben-tuviae. It is probable that trunk 
ring counts for these two types should be recorded as 16 rather than 17. 


Ryukyus, and the fourth at Easter and Pitcairn islands. These are island 
groups in which considerable fish collecting has been carried out in shallow 
water in recent years. 

The following abbreviations are used for institutions in this paper: AMS 
(Australian Museum-Sydney); ANSP (Academy of Natural Sciences of Phil- 
adelphia); BM(NH) [British Museum (Natural History)]; BPBM (Bernice 
P. Bishop Museum); CAS (California Academy of Sciences); LACM (Los 
Angeles County Museum of Natural History); SMF (Senckenberg Museum) ; 
and USNM (United States National Museum). 

Technical assistance in making counts and measurements has been pro- 
vided by Mr. D. Anderson. 


THE DUNCKEROCAMPUS COMPLEX 


Seven long-nosed species of very spiny belly-pouch Indo-Pacific pipefishes 
are members of the Dunckerocampus complex. All of these including the 
related Doryrhamphus and Oostethus pipefishes have a first trunk ring, 
i.e., the one bearing the pectoral fins, that is twice as long as any of the 
remaining trunk rings. Although it is actually double, it is counted as a 
single ring. In meristic characters these species are very similar (table 
1). Based on pigment patterns or the absence thereof, members of the 
Dunckerocampus complex fall into four categories: the first is the narrow- 
banded group whose two members usually have 4 or 5 very narrow pigment 
bands on the opercle, two or more on each trunk ring and sometimes on 
each tail ring. Dunckerocampus multiannulatus (Regan) 1903, was described 
from Mauritius and was characterized by a lack of banding on the snout. 


VoL. XXXIX] HERALD & RANDALL: PIPEFISHES 123 


Dunckerocampus ben-tuviae Fowler and Steinitz 1956, described from the 
Red Sea had the same meristic characters but did have banding on the 
snout. Dr. Eugenie Clark advises us that Red Sea pipefishes of the D. 
multiannulatus/D. ben-tuviae group have a wide range of snout banding 
variability so that D. ben-tuviae will need to be considered a synonym of 
D. multiannulatus. 

The remaining species in the narrow-banded group, Dunckerocampus 
pessuliferous, is distinct from other Dunckerocampus in having a high dorsal 
fin count of 30 as compared with a normal range of 20-25. It is known 
from the holotype taken by dredge at a depth of 144 feet at Sulade Island 
in the southern Philippines. 

The two species in the wide-band group usually have a single pigment 
ring for each trunk and tail ring. The most common species is the central 
and western Pacific D. dactyliophorus; it has a single ring around the opercle 
which differentiates it from the twin opercular rings of D. caulleryi Chabanaud 
known only from Amboina and New Caledonia. This latter species has two 
subspecies: D. c. caulleryi with 19 tail rings, and D. c. chapmani Herald 
with 16 or 17 tail rings. More material is needed to determine the status 
of these two. 

The third category is represented by the striped Hawaiian endemic described 
as new herein: Dunckerocampus baldwini. This species extends the generic 
range from the Austral Islands northward to the Hawaiian region, a distance 
of about 2800 miles. And, finally, the fourth category is that group of pipe- 
fishes that, unlike Dunckerocampus, developed the brood pouch folds; the 
new genus and species for this is Dentirostrum janssi described as follows: 


Dentirostrum Herald and Randall, new genus 

Diacnosis. Spiny, long-snouted Doryrhamphine pipefish with abdominal 
brood area protected by lateral membranous folds but without protecting 
plates. Lateral trunk ridge continuous with inferior tail ridge at anal ring; 
superior trunk and tail ridges discontinuous at end of dorsal fin; lateral 
tail ridge ending free at anal ring. Tail non-prehensile. Dorsal fin rays 
21-24, anal 4, pectoral 19-21, caudal 10; trunk rings 16; tail rings 20- 
23. Named Dentirostrum in reference to the magnificent spines present on 
the median snout ridge of males and to a lesser extent on females. 

Discussion. Dentirostrum is most closely related to Dunckerocampus 
from which it differs, (1) in having brood pouch flaps rather than having 
the eggs nakedly attached to the abdomen, (2) in its extremely spinose 
nose ridge, and (3) in the presence of a secondary spine behind the primary 
spine at the ring juncture of the superior and inferior trunk ridges. Den- 
tirostrum and Doryrhamphus are similar in that both have brood-pouch 
folds, but the latter differs in its small size and its short snout. 


124 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH Serr. 


The type species of Dentirostrum, D. janssi, is new and is the only 
known member of the genus. The description of D. janssi based on 34 
specimens (14 males 61-126 mm. SL and 20 females 52-110 mm. SL) 
from 19 localities in the Indo-Malayan region is as follows: 


Dentirostrum janssi Herald and Randall, new species. 
(Figure 1.) 


From the Patau IsLaAnps: 13 types, 6 localities. 

Hototype. CAS 14139, male 125 mm. SL, with 126 brood patch sockets— 
a few with eggs; Arappu Point of Koror to Ho Island, south side of reef; 
0-50 feet; H. DeWitt; November 19, 1957 (GVF 1442). 

ParATYPES. CAS 14140, male 123 mm. SL; same data as holotype. CAS 
14141, male 105 mm. SL; south entrance to small bay on west side of 
Ngalab Point, Koror Island; 0-50 feet; H. DeWitt; November 21, 1957 
(GVF 1445). CAS 14142, female 89 mm. SL; Iwayama Bay, off Kaibakku 
Island; 0-45 feet; H. DeWitt; October 3, 1957 (GVF 1408). AMS 16144-001, 
male 103 mm. SL; female 105 mm. SL; LACM 32123-1, male 105 mm. 
SL; SMF 11425, male 111 mm. SL; channel between Sanryo Island and 
Ngatkumer Island, Iwayama Bay; 0-50 feet; H. DeWitt; October 31, 1957 
(GVF 1433). CAS 14143, 3 females, 53 mm., 97 mm., 103 mm. SL; channel 
between Sanryo Island and Kamori Island, Iwayama Bay; 0-42 feet; H. 
DeWitt; November 18, 1957 (GVF 1439). BPBM 11937, male 102 mm. 
SL; female 83 mm. SL; western tip of Ngargol Island; 20-40 feet, coral; 
J. E. Randall, E. 5. Heliman, O. Custer; June 8, 1968. 

From THAILAND: 16 paratypes, 9 localities. 

BPBM 11938, female 91 mm. SL; NW. side of Koh Kroi Island about 
5.5 miles ESE. of Ban Pae Fisheries Training Center, Rayong Province; 
0-4 meters; H. A. Fehlmann; April 30, 1960 (GVF 2183). CAS 14146, male 
77 mm. SL; NW. side of Goh Samet Island, Rayong Province; 0-2 meters; 
B. Bronson; April 29, 1960 (GVF 2180). CAS 14147, 3 females, 62 mm., 
64 mm., 83 mm. SL; NW. side of Goh Raed about 1.5 miles ESE. of 
Prachuap Khiri Khan town, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province; 0-15 feet 
(photo 3-79 a-c); H. A. Fehlmann; June 19, 1961 (GVF 2651). USNM 
206654, male 126 mm. SL; female 78.5 mm. SL; CAS 14148, 2 males 80 
mm. and 61 mm. SL; female 59 mm. SL; W. side of Goh Luem ca. 3 
miles SE. of Prachuap Khiri Khan Town, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province; 
0-15 feet; H. A. Fehlmann; June 18, 1961 (GVF 2648). CAS 14149, 2 
females 95 mm. and 102 mm. SL; W. side of Goh Luem, Prachuap Khiri 
Khan Province; 0-15 feet; H. A. Fehlmann; June 17, 1961 (GVF 2646). 
CAS 14150, female 111 mm. SL; on fringing reef at head of Gulf of Siam, 
Goh Sak Island, about 35 miles NE. of Prachuap Khiri Khan town, Prachuap 


VoL. XXXIX] HERALD & RANDALL: PIPEFISHES 125 


PAPA saay. 
aoaaeaaaners 


a a a ae 


mm 


Ficure 1. Dentirostrum janssi Herald and Randall, Holotype; male 125 mm. SL 
(CAS 14139); (a) lateral view; (b) expanded ventral view of brood patch area; (c) 
head detail male holotype compared with (d) head detail female 111 mm. SL paratype 
(CAS 14150). Drawing by H. Hamman. 


Khiri Khan Province; 0-20 feet; H. A. Fehlmann and R. Rofen; October 
24, 1957 (GVF 1460). CAS 14151, female 58 mm. SL; SW. point on Goh 
Chorakhay, Chumphon Province; 0-16 feet; B. Bronson; May 25, 1960 
(GVF 2199). CAS 14152, male 91 mm. SL; fringing reef on NW. side 
of Goh Maprao, Chumphon Province; 0-12 feet; H. A. Fehlmann; May 
18, 1960 (GVF 2186). CAS 14153, male 105 mm. SL; Prond Bay at SW. 


126 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


corner of Goh Samed, ca. 100 meters from shore, Chumphon Province; 0- 
10 feet; H. A. Fehlmann; May 17, 1960 (GVF 2185). 

From OTHER LOCALITIES”: 5 paratypes. 

CAS 14145, 2 females 96 mm. and 107 mm. SL; Bay of Nhatrang 
SW. of Hon Long, Vietnam, South China Sea; 1-15 meters; R. Bolin; 
March 14, 1960 (GVF 2116). BPBM 11939, female 93 mm. SL; Bay of 
Nhatrang, Hon Long, Ving Damlon, Vietnam, South China Sea; 1-6 meters; 
R. Bolin; February 23, 1960 (GVF 2072). CAS 14144, male 93 mm. 
SL; Surabaja, Java, Indonesia; Hilmi Oesman; February 1961. ANSP 119933, 
female 99 mm. SL; Little Hope Island, NE. end, Queensland, Australia; 
5-8 meters; J. Tyler, C. L. Smith, and G. Bettle; January 3, 1969. 

It will be noted that the distribution of Dentirostrum janssi does not 
include the Philippines although it is known from west, east, and south 
of that area. It is probable that it will be found there when rotenone 
collecting is conducted by diving methods using scuba. 

Diacnosis. Dorsal fin rays 21-24, usually 23-24; dorsal covering a total 
of 5—6% rings of which 1-2 are trunk rings and 4-5 are tail rings; usual 
count: 1 + 5. Trunk rings 16, tail rings 20-23, usually 22; pectoral 19- 
21, usually 20; anal 4, caudal 10. Head-in-standard length 4.2—5.0; snout- 
in-head 1.5—1.9; dorsal-base-in-head 1.9-2.8; brood pouch folds extending 
from second trunk ring to anal ring, and occasionally as far as 4th tail 
ring. Eggs large, about .75 mm. diameter; largest number in belly brood 
patch: 195 (105 mm. male). Ridge system and brood patch folds typical 
of Dentirostrum. 

DescripTION. Nearly all ridges of head, trunk, and tail are spinose. The 
median snout ridge of the males has 15-21 large spines, and on each side 
there is a lateral ridge with smaller spines. The spines on females are less 
accentuated. The supranasal ridge is present. The anterior ocular ridge 
is lacking, and the posterior ridge is smooth. The orbit is ringed with small 
spines. The opercle has a smooth median ridge over its entire length, and 
beneath it may have 5-7 additional radiating ridges (compare figs. le and 
1d). The pectoral cover plate has 1 or 2 spines on its upper anterior 
edge, and a single spine in the center. Superior and inferior trunk ridges have 
double spines at each ring juncture, but on the tail only a single spine 
at each ring. The lateral trunk ridge has double spines for the first 5-7 
rings, and then a single spine for the next 9-11 rings. 

Between 62 and 80 mm. the future brood patch folds show their presence 
by a pair of darkly pigmented lines on the abdominal surface of the male. 
Among the 14 males only two had eggs attached to the brood patch: the 


2A new male Dentirostrum janssi (106 mm. SL) has just arrived; it is a depth record (100 feet) 
captured at Kranket I., Madang, New Guinea; G. R. Allen, May 15, 1972. 


VoL. XXXIX] HERALD & RANDALL: PIPEFISHES 127 


125 mm. male holotype (126 brood patch sockets, a few with eggs) and a 
103 mm. male (21 eggs and 135 empty sockets = 156). These were collected 
in October and November in the Palaus. Another male of 111 mm. collected 
at the same time and place showed 156 empty egg sockets. Two males, 
91 and 105 mm. from Chumphon Province, Gulf of Thailand (May collection), 
showed 106 and 195 empty sockets. All 33 specimens had 16 trunk rings, 
and the male brood patch folds usually cover 15 of the 16. However, five 
of the 14 males had the folds extending upon the tail, the furthest distance 
being 3% tail rings. Although the range of brood pouch coverage was 15 
to 19% rings there was no indication of vascularity on the tail portion of the 
pouches. It is probable that this small tail section is not used as a brood 
area. 

The overall color of Dentirostrum janssi is light brown with two pairs 
of dark brown lines extending from the head to the dorsal fin with one 
on each side of each superior trunk ridge. The first pair extends from above 
the eye dorsally on the inside edge of the superior trunk ridge, whereas the 
second pair extends from the center part of the eye over the opercle and 
along the upper lateral side of the superior trunk ridge. The tail fin has 
a clear center section surrounded by a dark reddish black area. The junior 
author’s field notes on two males collected in the Palaus at Ngargol Island 
indicate that the body is blackish anteriorly and posteriorly with orange in 
the middle. Also, the pigment around the tail fin shows a small amount 
of white on the outer edge. 

Discussion. From the upper west side of the Gulf of Siam (GVF 64: 
BanAangtong Bay; CAS 14155), we have three small specimens (33, 33.5, 
and 42 mm. SL) that have all of the characteristics of D. janssi except that 
they have a single spine on each ring of trunk and tail and are lacking the 
double spines of the trunk of D. janssi. Our smallest specimen of the latter 
species is 58 mm. SL (CAS 14151), and it has the physical characteristics 
of the adults. Among the syngnathids, spines are usually lost with growth, 
not added. Because of the lack of spines on these three specimens, we are 
faced with the possibility of another species of Dentirostrum existing in this 
area. However, we will not describe these as new at this time, but will 
await the collection of adult material from the same area. 

At this same GVF station 64, juvenile representatives of two additional 
species of syngnathids were collected: 8 specimens (average length 44 mm.) 
of Corythoichthys species (CAS 14318) and a 61 mm. specimen tentatively 
identified as Syngnathus maxweberi (CAS 14317). 

Named ‘janssi? in honor of Mr. Edwin Janss, Jr., whose keen interest 
in tropical marine biology has resulted in important field investigations in 
many regions. 


128 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


FicurRE 2. Dunckerocampus baldwini Herald and Randall, Holotype; male 125 mm. 
SL (CAS 24734); cave SE. of Pokai Bay, Waianae coast, Oahu; 70 feet. Photograph 
by J. E. Randall. 


Dunckerocampus baldwini Herald and Randall, new species. 
(Figure 2.) 

Twenty type specimens from the Hawaiian Islands: Oahu (17), Hawaii 
(2), and Maui (1). Capture methods: by hand, quinaldine, and chemfish 
ichthyocide. Depth range 20-160 feet; size range 63-131 mm. SL. 

HototypPe. CAS 24734, male 120.5 mm. SL (125.5 mm. total length); 
cave SE. of Pokai Bay, Waianae coast, Oahu; 70 feet; J. E. Randall and 
S. Swerdloff; July 20, 1969. 

PARATYPES. CAS 24735, female 125 mm. SL; same data as holotype. 
LACM 32126-1, female 126 mm. SL; CAS 14138, 2 males 106.5 and 129 
mm. SL; 3 females 129, 131, and 131 mm. SL; Waianae coast off Makaha 
Shores Condominium, Oahu; 45 feet; J. E. Randall and A. R. Emery; April 
26, 1970. BPBM 11941, 2 females 63 and 128 mm. SL: Waianae coast 
off Lahilahi Point, Oahu; 40 feet; J. E. Randall and P. M. Allen; July 
11, 1970. SMF 11426, female 128 mm. SL; Kawaihoa Point, Maunalua 


VoL. XXXIX] HERALD & RANDALL: PIPEFISHES 129 


Bay, Oahu; 35 feet, lava caves; Jane Culp; November 15, 1971. AMS 
15607-001, female 123.5 mm. SL; CAS 14137, female 134 mm. SL; Kawaihoa 
Point, Maunalua Bay, Oahu; 35 feet, lava caves; Jane Culp and James 
Moore; December 18, 1971. USNM 204683, female 92 mm. SL; off north 
side at base of dropoff, Moku Manu, Oahu; 160 feet; J. E. Randall, T. 
Stark, W. Baldwin; October 9, 1969. BM(NH) 970.1.26:1, female (?) 
72 mm. SL, Moku Manu, Oahu; 85 feet; J. E. Randall and W. Baldwin; 
October 6, 1969. BPBM 7783, male 124 mm. SL; female 125 mm. SL; 
Kanoehe Bay at channel entrance, Oahu; 95 feet; J. E. Randall, D. Chave, 
W. Hashimoto; October 10, 1969. BPBM 11940, male 102 mm. SL (tail 
broken at 11th ring; caudal regenerated); north end of Honaunau Bay, Kona 
coast, Hawaii; 150 feet; J. E. Randall, E. S. Hobson, J. R. Chess; August 
16, 1969. BPBM 11942, male 130 mm. SL; first point north of Hanakahau 
Boat Harbor, Kona Coast, Hawaii; 100 feet; J. E. Randall; August 18, 
1970. CAS 14979, female 117 mm. SL; 1% miles north of Lahina, Maui, 
Hawaii; 20 feet; Steinhart Divers; June 29, 1972. 

Diacnosis. Holotype belly brood area covering % 12 % trunk rings with 
143 egg sockets—73 on right and 70 on left. Dorsal fin rays 21-23; pectoral 
19-21; anal 4; caudal 10; dorsal fin covering %—1 trunk ring and 3% tail 
rings; usually “4 + 3; total rings covered by dorsal 3%—4%; trunk rings 
16; tail rings 20-21; head-in-standard length 4.5—5.2; snout-in-head 1.5— 
1.7; dorsal fin base-in-head 2.9-3.5. Ridge system typical of Dunckerocampus, 
i.e., lateral trunk ridge continuous with inferior tail ridge; median tail ridge 
extending forward to anal ring. Tail fin long, 5-7 mm. in adults of 100 
mm. or larger. General appearance except color similar to other members 
of genus Dunckerocampus. Color in life reddish, fading to dark with preserva- 
tion. Red stripe along upper part of body from snout to tail. Edges of 
caudal fin white. 

DeEscriPTION. Median snout ridge with many serrations; orbital, opercular, 
nuchal, and pectoral cover plate crests faintly visible. Eye very large, the 
orbit diameter contained almost two times in minimum snout depth or % 
length of opercle. Intermedial scutella between rings small and equal in 
width to one-half distance between scutella. Body ridges well developed with 
sharp spine projecting at posterior edge of juncture of each ring. 

The following color description was made from 102 mm. Honaunau Bay 
male shortly after capture: 


“light pinkish gray with broad dorso-lateral bright orange-red stripe becoming 
blackish red and narrower on snout; also a broad orange-red stripe midventrally 
extending forward on snout as red and blackish red. Snout yellowish, white 
dorsally and yellow between lateral and ventral blackish red stripes; tail nearly 
entirely red (red stripes close together); caudal fin red with a narrow white 
edge at sides, and a black area distally on 2 upper central interradial membranes; 
dorsal colorless.”’ 


130 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


In preservative the males apparently retain the color stripe along the 
head and trunk much better than do the females. The 125 mm. female 
from Kaneohe Bay (BPBM 7783) has a conspicuous blackish tip on the 
outer margin of the last five rays of the dorsal fin. Other specimens did 
not show this character. 

Discussion. Capture data and dive observation records indicate that 
specimens of Dunckerocampus baldwini are often found in pairs. In captivity 
longevity has been short, usually no more than 2 months. This compares 
with about three months longevity for the banded pipefish, D. dactyliophorus. 
In recent years this latter species has often been imported into the United 
States from the Philippines. 

Cleaning activity by Dunckerocampus baldwini has been observed by 
Dr. Edith Chave. While diving at Milolii, Hawaii (August 4, 1970), in a 
cave at a depth of 75 feet, she watched an adult redstripe pipefish clean 
a cardinal fish, Apogon evermanni, then a moray eel, Gymnothorax species, 
and finally the pipefish attempted to clean Dr. Chave’s wrist. 

Only two other species of pipefishes are known to act as cleaners. Randall 
(1962) reported D. P. Wilson’s observations at the Plymouth Aquarium of 
a John Dory being cleaned by the snake pipefish, Entelurus aequoreus. The 
junior author has also observed the flagtail pipefish, Doryrhamphus mela- 
nopleura, cleaning reef fishes, specifically a moray and a cardinal (Randall 
and Helfman, 1972). 

In recognition of his study of Pacific fishes, the redstripe pipefish, 
Dunckerocampus baldwini, is named in honor of Wayne J. Baldwin who 
with the junior author collected the first specimens of this new species. 


Dunckerocampus dactyliophorus (Bleeker) 1853. 
Banded Pipefish. 


Syngnathus dactyliophorus Bleeker, Nat. Tijdschr. Nederl. Indiee, vol. 4, p. 506, 1853 
(type locality, Onrust Island, Djakarta [Batavia], Java). 


Herald (1953, p. 252) studied geographic variability of meristic characters 
in a small series of Dunckerocampus dactyliophorus. He postulated sexual 
dimorphism in the trunk color ring pattern with females having a greater 
number than males. Tables 2 and 3 present data on the 62 specimens from 
22 localities now available. Unfortunately, there does not appear to be any 
recognizable pattern that can be correlated with sex or area. It will be 
noted that the trunk ring count is remarkably constant at 16 with only one 
of 62 having a different count, i.e., 15. Size range for the 62 specimens 
was 41 to 159 mm. SL. The smallest mature male showing egg sockets on 
the brood patch area was 90 mm. 

The banded pipefish has some interesting color ring variations. The typical 


VoL. XXXIX] HERALD & RANDALL: PIPEFISHES 131 


TABLE 2. Geographic variation of Dunckerocampus dactyliophorus. 


Trunk 
Rings Tail Rings Dorsal Fin Rays 
ye) ly iy IG Koy a aa 2s AON Bil BRP Bs ab DS 

Australs 2 2 2 
Marshalls 6 5 gS 
Kapingamarangi 1 1 1 
Guam 1 1 1 
Ulithi 2 2 2 
Palaus 1 29 9 21 o) 12 7 
Philippines 6 tee v4 1 IT the Sh as 
Solomons 2 il 1 1 
Celebes 6 to § 3 2 1 
Java 1 1 
New Guinea 5 5 Se, 
Totals (62) i “Oil 10 40 10 2} 2 SS 2a Oe 


pattern shows about 5 rings on the snout (range 4-7), 1 over, under, and 
rarely through the eye, another around the opercle, 1 at the pectoral fins, 
then (table 3) 6-13 on the trunk, and 7-14 on the tail. The pattern for 
any given specimen is recorded as 5-1-1-1-7-9 = 24. The width of the 
individual color band is usually 42 to “% of an individual ring. However, 
the two Ulithi specimens (BPBM 8746) have remarkably narrow color 
bands; in width they are only equal to about % to ™% of a trunk or tail 
ring. Another extreme is shown by a 91 mm. specimen from Urukthapel 
in the Palaus (BPBM 7352); the color bands were very wide, 1 to 1% 
rings in width. 

Dunckerocampus dactyliophorus ranges through the western and central 
Pacific. The type locality, Djakarta, is the westernmost point in the distribu- 
tional pattern, and until recently the easternmost was 4300 miles away at 
Rongelap Atoll in the Marshall Islands. However, in 1971 the junior author 
diving at a depth of 185 feet collected two specimens at Rurutu (lat. 24° 
S.) in the Austral Islands. This extended the range westward for another 
2700 miles and southward for 900 miles from the latitude of the Solomons 
(lat. 9° S.). The northernmost locality is Guam (lat. 12° N.). 

Recently Dr. Eugenie Clark advised us that she has examined Dunckero- 
campus dactyliophorus from the Red Sea (Eilat, Gulf of Aqaba) which is 
some 8800 miles (by water) from Djakarta. This break in distribution is 
similar to that which occurs in Corythoichthys flavofasciatus with the sub- 
species of C. f. flavofasciatus in the Red Sea and C. f. conspicillatus many 
miles away in the Central Pacific (Herald, 1953, p. 275). 


132 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


TaBLe 3. Geographic variation of Dunckerocampus dactyliophorus. 


Trunk Color Bands Tail Color Bands 

7 Be —@) lO. abl 22 ie 7 8 9) DOI Stas 
Australs i ail 1 1 
Marshalls Se nlee2 1 292 1 
Kapingamarangi 1 1 
Guam 1 1 
Ulithi i! 1 1 1 
Palaus A S1S s6r 4: 5. 4)» 59 2 
Philippines Wee 2e> 2k et See 
Solomons 2 2 
Celebes a ae 1 31 ee 1 
Java 1 1 
New Guinea 1 4 2M aes 
Totals (62) aks ale alk alloy ao) 1 6 16° 18> PIS: 


The specific collection localities for Dunckerocampus dactyliophorus listed 
for the general areas of tables 2 and 3 are as follows: Marshall Islands: 
Rongelap, Bikini, and Eniwetok atolls; Palaus: Koror, Auluptagel, Babelthaup, 
Urukthapel, and Arakabesan islands; Solomons: New Georgia and Florida 
islands; Philippines: Cebu, Jolo, Pandanan Island, and Sibutu. Although 
the Philippine localities are all from the southern section, we have been advised 
by Mr. Earl Kennedy, who is the major Manila live fish jobber, that the 
species is fairly well distributed throughout the islands; most of his specimens 
come from Luzon (Batangas), Mindoro, and Palawan. Amboina is the only 
recorded locality from which we have not examined specimens. 


THE PIPEFISH OF EASTER AND PITCAIRN ISLANDS 


On the map of the world, Easter Island is a small dot in the eastern 
south Pacific some 2000 miles west of Caldera, Chile, and about 1100 miles 
east of Pitcairn, the nearest inhabited island. This isolated volcanic outcrop 
has a total area of 46 square miles, being about 14 miles long and 7 miles 
wide (27° 05’ S. Lat. and 109° 20’ W. Long.). Although the island is inter- 
nationally famed because of the giant stone statues, the published record of 
its ichthyological fauna and relationships is less well known (Randall, 1970). 
In recent years three field parties of biologists (1958, 1965, and 1969) have 
made collections at various sites around the island. All have used ichthyocides, 
and among them they have taken ten specimens from three localities of the 
first syngnathid to be collected in the area. In December 1971 the junior 


VoL. XXXIX] HERALD & RANDALL: PIPEFISHES 133 


author visited Pitcairn Island and was able to collect three additional specimens. 
The type series consists of 13 specimens: 5 males (69-85.5 mm. SL) and 
8 females (67-95 mm. SL). 

Several years ago Dr. David K. Caldwell studied the Ramsey Parks 
1958 series of 6 specimens at the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural 
History. He tentatively determined that they represented an undescribed 
species. This we are now able to verify, and we name this species in his 
honor. 


Syngnathus caldwelli Herald and Randall, new species. 
(Figure 3.) 


Hototyer. LACM 6560-3, 76 mm. standard length male with eggs in 
pouch. Anakena Cove, Easter Island; Ramsey Parks, Yacht Chiriqui; boulders 
and brown algae, rotenone to 4.6 m.; October 1, 1958. 

PARATYPES. (5 from same collection as holotype): LACM 6560-41, 69 
mm. male and 82 mm. female; CAS 24202: 71 mm. male and 65.5 mm. 
female; and USNM 203409, 79 mm. female. Another collection made at 
type locality 6% years later—BC 65440, 84 mm. male (pouch empty); 
closed tidepools, depth % to 8 m., rotenone; Ian E. Efford and Jack A. 
Mathias, Jan. 15, 1964. Ten days later at nearby Vinapu on southwest 
side—BC 65449, 2 females 93 and 93.5 mm.; large boulders and rocks; depth 
2-3 m., rotenone, also Efford and Mathias, Jan. 25, 1965. Finally, 10% 
years after first colection—BPBM 6596, 95 mm. female (fig. 2); southwest 
coast between Hanga-Roa and Hanga-piko, inshore; depth 61 cm.; boulder 
bottom with brown algae; chemfish; J. E. Randall and G. R. Allen; January 
26, 1969. BPBM 10856, 82 mm. male and 80 mm. female. Pitcairn Island, 
off “the Rope” 20 ft., large boulders with brown algae, sand and small rocks 
in low places; J. E. Randall, Dean B. Cannoy, Steve Christian, and Noggie 
Young; December 23, 1970. CAS 13922, 75 mm. female, same data as BPBM 
10856. 

Diacnosis. Dorsal fin: 28-31; 7 specimens with 28 rays; 3 with 29; 
2, 30; and 1, 31; pectoral 14-16; usually 14; anal 3; caudal 10; dorsal 
fin covering 6%4—7% rings, i.e., 72-1 trunk ring and 6-6% tail rings usually 
1 + 6; trunk rings 16-17; tail rings 34-36; head-in-standard length 8.5— 
9.2; snout-in-head 2.2—2.6; head-in-dorsal fin base 1.06—-1.15; dorsal fin 
base-in-head .87—.95. Lateral body ridges typical for genus Syngnathus: i.e., 
lateral trunk ridge interrupted at anal ring, then subcontinuous with lateral 
tail ridge (65.5 mm. female has the two ridges continuous on one side 
only). Brood pouch covering first 13-15 tail rings; eggs large, 1 mm. diameter, 
arranged in 3—4 single rows across pouch (holotype) or 2 rows wide and 2 
rows deep (69 mm. male). Holotype egg count 88; for 69 mm. male: 19 


134 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 3. Syngnathus caldwelli Herald and Randall, Paratype; female 93 mm. SL 
(BPBM 6596); Easter Island between Hanga-Roa and MHanga-piko. Photograph by 
J. E. Randall. 


and 21 eggs for dorsal rows and 14-14 for ventral rows or about 68 for 
total pouch count. Brood pouch folds almost in contact but without overlap 
or indentation, merely slightly thickened at free end of individual flap (modified 
Open Brood Pouch Closure: O-BPC). Color in preservative, brownish some- 
times with many narrow dark lines running length of body. Eye may have 
dark band extending obliquely postero-ventrally over opercle. Dark spots 
sometimes present at juncture point between rings on inferior trunk ridge, 
and to lesser extent on lateral trunk ridge. Spots on Pitcairn pipefishes, 
larger and very pronounced; also with wide whitish areas on upper surface: 
about 4 on trunk and 7 on tail. 

DescrRIPTION. Median snout ridge smooth, extending forward from inter- 
orbital area for about half snout length. Superior ocular ridge extends 


VoL. XXXIX] HERALD & RANDALL: PIPEFISHES 135 


posteriorly for distance equal to eye width but is absent anteriorly. Eye 
very large, in diameter about equal to 2% of snout length. Nuchal plates 
bilobed, indistinct. Upper and lower pectoral ridge plates evident but not 
pronounced; opercular ridge extends over % to *% length of opercle. Body 
ridges evident, smooth, and not strongly pronounced. Lateral flanges of brood 
pouch slightly developed. 

Fretp Notes. The junior author and G. R. Allen collected the most 
recent Easter Island paratype and also made color and black and white 
photographs at the time of capture. From field notes the near-living color 
of Syngnathus caldwelli from Easter Island is: 


“light brown with row of red dots along anterior lateral ridge and full length 
of ventral flange; a small red spot at front and at rear of dorsal fin; ventral 
part of body light yellowish with a midventral row of red dots along trunk; 
large irregular light gray blotches on back and upper side; a dark brown band 
running from snout through lower half of eye where it broadens on lower opercle 
and continues as a broad zone on chest; caudal fin yellowish with brown rays; 
dorsal fin clear.” 


Any distinctive marks on the 1958 specimens have been largely lost 
following preservation. The two 1965 specimens from Vinapu are the only 
ones to show clearly the narrow lines on the body, about 12 on the top 
of the trunk and approximately 10 on the trunk sides. The 1965 Anakena 
specimen is very dark and its markings are suggestive of the 1969 specimen 
whose near-life colors are described above. 

Comparisons. In the Indo-Pacific from Africa to the Americas there 
are about 34 members of the genus Syngnathus, excluding Corythoichthys and 
Bombonia. None of these approach Syngnathus caldwelli in their numerical 
or other characteristics. The nearest relative is probably Syngnathus balli 
of Hawaii. However, the latter is a smaller species (58 mm.) with fewer 
tail rings (32 vs. 35-36) and fewer dorsal fin rays (21-23 vs. 28-31). 


Syngnathus banneri Herald and Randall, new species. 
(Figure 4.) 

HototyrEs. BPBM 8695, 39 mm. SL (40 mm. TL) undet. sex; Ryukyu 
Islands, Ishigaki; reef about ’2 mile off harbor of Ishigaki City; depth 20- 
35 feet; chemfish ichthyocide; J. E. Randall and A. H. Banner, May 22, 
1968. 

PaRATYPE. CAS 14375, 26.5 mm. SL (27.3 mm. TL) immature; Marshall 
Islands, Eniwetok Atoll, lagoon off Eniwetok Island; 25 feet, coral and rubble 
patch; quinaldine; J. E. Randall, March 31, 1972. 

Diacnosts. Dorsal fin rays 16-18 located on a total of 3'2—-4 rings (%4-— 
1 trunk and 3-3% tail rings); pectoral 11; anal 2; caudal 10. Trunk rings 


136 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


5 mm 


Ficure 4. Syngnathus banneri Herald and Randall, Holotype; imm. 39 mm. SL 
(BPBM 8695); reef near Ishigaki City, Ryukyus. Drawing by L. Sabre. 


15; tail rings 27. Head-in-standard length 7.3—7.8; snout-in-head 2.5-3.2; 
dorsal fin base-in-head 1.7-1.8. Body ridge pattern typical of Syngnathus, 
i.e., lateral trunk ridge discontinuous with lateral tail ridge at end of anal 
ring; inferior trunk and tail ridges continuous and superior trunk and tail 
ridges discontinuous at end of dorsal fin. Brood pouch unknown. 

DEscrIPTION. Holotype median snout ridge with two triangular flanges 
just anterior to nostrils; orbital ridge markedly extended dorsally; prenuchal- 
nuchal ridges present but not accentuated. Opercular ridge extending over 
one-half (paratype three-quarters) of opercle. Superior and inferior pectoral 
cover plate ridges sharply pronounced. Trunk and tail ridges slightly raised 
and indented between individual rings so that ridgés have moderately scalloped 
profile. Paratype ridges for the most part less accentuated than holotype. 
Holotype color light tan with exception of dark brown spot pattern on 
anterior trunk; beginning behind pectoral, 6 spots on lower trunk ridge and 
5 on lateral trunk ridge on left side; spots on right side less distinct; on 
dorsal surface 9 dark brown bars, one-half ring in width: 3 extending 
between superior trunk ridges and 6 between superior tail ridges. Paratype 
color whitish with dark area on lower sides of gill cover extending underneath 
pectoral fins. 

Discussion. Syngnathus banneri is a remarkable species for it has the 
lowest dorsal fin count of any member of the genus (16-18 as compared 
with a normal range of about 19-45), and with this is combined a very 
low tail ring count of 27. When egg-bearing males are available for examination, 
this species will probably prove to be a member of the subgenus Microsyngnathus 
Herald 1953. These are small Svngnathine pipefishes usually less than 100 
mm. in length that have overlapping brood pouch closures (O-BPC). 

Named ‘banneri’? in honor of Dr. A. H. Banner whose welcome field 
efforts resulted in the capture of the holotype of this species. 


VoLt. XXXIX] HERALD & RANDALL: PIPEFISHES 137 


Minyichthys Herald and Randall, new subgenus 
of Micrognathus Duncker 1915 


Type Species. Micrognathus brachyrhinus Herald 1953. 

Diacnosis. Differentiated from other members of Micrognathus by in- 
creased number of trunk rings (19-21 rather than 13-17), very short snout, and 
small size (mature at less than 50 mm.). Named Minyichthys, small fish, 
from the Greek ‘“miny” meaning small. 

Discussion. Pipefishes of the genus Micrognathus have the lateral trunk 
ridge continuous with the inferior tail ridge and the lateral tail ridge is 
present. The tail brood pouch has everted type closure in which the outer 
lip of one flap is turned back upon itself, and the other flap overlaps it 
(Herald, 1959). There are three subgenera: (1) Anarchopterus Hubbs 1935, 
characterized by smooth body ridges and absence of the anal fin, has two 
species limited to the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean; (2) Minyichthys, defined 
above, has two Pacific species; and (3) the type subgenus Micrognathus with 
its typical sharp body ridges, has two Atlantic American species and nine 
Pacific species. 


Micrognathus (Minyichthys) myersi Herald and Randall, new species. 
(Figures 5 and 6.) 


HorotyPe. CAS 13918, 42.5 mm. SL mature male (43.5 mm. TL); 
Guam, NW. Cocos Island, outside of reef, 70-100 feet depth; rotenone; 
June 30, 1969; J. E. Randall, e¢ al. 

PARATYPE. BPBM 8759, 41 mm. SL female (43 mm. TL); Guam; south 
of Uruno Point, about 10 mi. NE. of Agana; depth 60-90 feet; reef edge 
adjacent to sand; June 27, 1968; J. E. Randall and H. Kami. 

Diacnosis. Dorsal fin rays 29-31 covering 9-10% rings, i.e., 2%-3 trunk 
rings and 64-77% tail rings; trunk rings 19, tail rings 40-41; pectoral 11- 
12; anal 2, caudal 8; head-in-standard length 7.2—8.92; snout-in-head 2.36- 
2.7; dorsal fin base-in-head .75—.93; pectoral base-in-pectoral length 1.6. Lat- 
eral ridge pattern typical of Micrognathus, i.e., median trunk ridge continuous 
with inferior tail ridge; lateral tail ridge extended forward onto 2 trunk 
rings (holotype) or 2% (paratype); superior trunk and superior tail ridges 
interrupted at posterior edge of dorsal fin. Distinctive spike on dorso- 
median snout ridge just ahead of nostrils. Brood pouch covering first 13 
tail rings with embryos to 10th ring; 7 large embryo sockets; pouch 
protecting plates slightly developed with pouch closure of everted type (E- 
BPC). Mouth extremely vertical. 

DEScRIPTION. With exception of internasal spike, all head and body 
ridges faint. Orbital ridge mildly accentuated with pronounced spine on 
anterior border (holotype) or moderate (paratype). Opercular ridge extending 


138 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


5 mm 


Ficure 5. Micrognathus myersi Herald and Randall, Holotype; male 42.5 mm. SL 
(CAS 13918); NW. Cocos Island, Guam. Drawing by L. Sabre. 


over half of opercle. Pectoral cover plate with faint superior and inferior 
ridges. Trunk and tail ridges with indentation between rings, and ridges 
with finely toothed edge. Base of dorsal fin resting in slight ‘V.’ Color 
light tan: holotype with indication of 4 pigment streaks extending downward 
from opercle and dark area on side of snout just anterior to eye. Paratype 
with indication of color bands formed by occasional dark spots: 7 bands 
or bars on trunk and 17 on tail. 

Discussion. Although the two type specimens are almost the same size, 
the holotype snout length is much greater than that of the paratype, with 
snout-in-head values being 2.36 and 2.7. If the other characters were not 
so similar, one would be tempted to consider them as closely related but 
separate species. 

Short snouts are the mark of the subgenus Minyichthys as is shown even 
better by the two known specimens of the genotype M. (Minyichthys) 
brachyrhinus (snout-in-head 3.17). A comparison between the two species 
of Minyichthys follows: 


M. (M.) brachyrhinus M. (M.) myersi 
Dorsal fin rays 23-25 29-31 
Rings covered 1%-1%+5%- 2%-3+6%4- 
by dorsal 6%4=74-8%4 74%2=9-10% 
Trunk rings 19-21 19 
Tail rings 37-39 40-41 
Snout-in-head 3.17-3.18 2.3-2.7 
Max. known size 31 mm. 42.5 mm. 
Distribution Oahu; Ticao I. Guam 

Philippines 


This new species is named in honor of Stanford faculty member Dr. 
George Myers (retired) who has been the major professor for many of 
today’s ichthyologists. 


VoL. XXXIX] HERALD & RANDALL: PIPEFISHES 139 


5 mm 


Ficure 6. Micrognathus myersi Herald and Randall, Paratype; female 41 mm. SL 
(BPBM 7579); south of Uruno Point, Guam. Drawing by L. Sabre. 


COMMENTS ON OTHER MICROGNATHUS 


Since the senior author’s Micrognathus study of 1953, there have been 
two additional new species, one in the Atlantic and one in the Pacific. In 
1964 Gilbert Whitley described Micrognathus boothae from Australia’s Lord 
Howe Island (off New South Wales). This species is closely related to 
M. brocki discovered at Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands, about 2570 
miles north of Lord Howe. The two species differ mainly in the shorter 
snout of M. boothae along with its 42 rather than 37 tail rings. Three 
specimens are known for the two species: the female holotypes of each 
plus a second specimen of M. brocki captured by the junior author in 1968 
at Ishigaki in the Ryukyu Islands. This 82 mm. female (BPBM 8755; 
20-70 feet) represents a westward range extension of about 2800 miles. 
When more material is available of both species, it is possible that the two 
may prove identical. 

In April and May 1971 the junior author collected four heavily-banded 
specimens of Micrognathus edmonsoni in the Marquesas. Three were taken 
at Nuka Hiva at a depth of 70 feet (BPBM 10857, 71 and 70 mm. SL, 
and CAS 13977, 62 mm.) and one was captured at 115 feet in Vaitahu Bay 
at Tahuata (BPBM 11936, 72 mm. SL). This is startling because previously 
this species had been considered a rare Hawaiian endemic. Although it was 
described more than 42 years ago (1930) only 7 other specimens are known 
from 3 localities on Oahu and Maui. This new locality extends the range 
about 2500 miles southward from the Hawaiian archipelago. It is entirely 
possible that this species is one of the deeper water syngnathids, and thus 
has escaped collections made by non-diving ichthyologists. 

Another problem deals with a pipefish originally described as [chthyocampus 
annulatus Macleay 1878. The two type specimens are actually Micrognathus 
brevirostris as shown by reexamination in 1971 by Dr. John R. Paxton 


140 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


at the Australian Museum. Unfortunately the artist used a specimen of 
Yozia species to make the illustration for the original description, and in 
some unknown way this fact escaped the notice of the author. 


LITERATURE CITED 


HERALD, EArt S. 

1953. Family Syngnathidae: Pipefishes. In: Leonard Schultz et al. Fishes of the 
Marshall and Marianas Islands. United States National Museum, Bulletin 
no. 202, pp. 231-278, 9 figs. 

1959. From pipefish to seahorse—a study of phylogenetic relationships. Proceedings 
of the California Academy of Sciences, ser. 4, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 465-473, 
3 figs. 

1969. A new pipefish from the Virgin Islands, Micrognathus dawsoni. Occasional 
Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, no. 73, 4 pp., 1 fig. 

RANDALL, JOHN E. 

1962. Fish service stations. Sea Frontiers, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47. 

1970. Easter Island, an ichthyological expedition. Oceans, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 48-59. 
RANDALL, JOHN E., AND E. HELFMAN 

In Press. Dipractacanthus xanthurus, a cleaner wrasse from the Palau Islands with 
notes on other cleaning fishes. Tropical Fish Hobbyist. 

SmMitH, J. L. B. 

1963. Fishes of the family Syngnathidae from the Red Sea and western Indian 

Ocean. Rhodes University Ichthyological Bulletin no. 27, pp. 515-543. 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 12, pp. 141-184; 11 figs. July 9, 1973 


THE GENUS MECAS LECONTE 
(COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) 


By 
John A. Chemsak and E. G. Linsley 
University of California, Berkeley 


The genus Mecas is a group of lamiines generally distributed from Guatemala 
to southcentral Canada. A single species occurs in North America west of the 
Rocky Mountains, but none are known from northeastern North America. Based 
upon present knowledge, most of the species are associated with weedy com- 
posites. A few of them are also lampyrid and/or cantharid and lycid mimics. 
Although the genus has been recently revised (Breuning, 1955), available in- 
formation and material have necessitated a further reclassification of the group. 


CLASSIFICATION AND NOMENCLATURE 


The first named species of Mecas as currently recognized (M. pergrata, M. 
cana, M. cinerea) were assigned by their authors to the genus Saperda Fabricius 
(Say, 1824; Newman, 1840). LeConte (1852, 1859a) transferred S. pergrata 
to Stenostola Mulsant, a generic name he also used for his ‘saturnina’ (LeConte, 
1859a), but left ‘cana’, which he did not know, in Saperda (he had no reason 
to refer to ‘cinerea’ which was from Mexico). In 1847, Haldemen described 
‘femoralis’ in the genus Phytoecia Mulsant, which LeConte (1852) made the 
monobasic type of his genus Mecas. Twenty-one years later, LeConte (1873a) 
added a second species, M. marginella, and defined the genus (1873b) in such 
a manner that all of the above species could be included, although he did not 
mention them by name. Unfortunately, Lacordaire (1872) overlooked Mecas 
which would have fallen in his Tribe IV (Phytoecides), although he included the 
related Dylobolus Thomson (which Bates later regarded as a synonym of Mecas) 
in his Groupe IV (Arenicides) and Pannychis Thomson (which we regard as a 


[141] 


142 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


subgenus of Mecas) in his Groupe III (Amphionychides). LeConte’s expanded 
concept of the genus was first applied to the North American species by Horn 
(1878) and to the Mexican species by Bates (1881). Casey (1913) provided a 
key to the species in his collection and Breuning (1955) published a revision of 
the genus. However, this revision is incomplete, since three of the species, M. 
inornata of authors, M. cineracea Casey, and M. bicallosa Martin were omitted. 
These were incorrectly transferred by Breuning to the genus Saperda, although 
their published characters (including the cleft or toothed claws in both sexes) 
and recorded host plants (weedy composites) are typical of the species currently 
and historically referred to Mecas (the species of Saperda are wood borers). 

Although the evolution of the generic concept of Mecas until the revision by 
Breuning was fairly straightforward, there has been considerable uncertainty 
regarding the identity of some of the species. The most serious confusion in- 
volves the name ‘Saperda inornata’ described from Missouri Territory by Say 
(1824), who used the broad concept of Saperda current in his time. LeConte 
(1852), not knowing what species Say had before him, included it in his treat- 
ment of Saperda, quoting from Say’s description as he did for other species 
which he had not identified. Obviously uncertain, he speculated that it might 
be the male of his S. concolor from Sante Fe, New Mexico, which he described 
in the same paper (LeConte, 1852). However, he apparently decided later 
that ‘imornata Say’ belonged to the genus Mecas, and the specimens standing 
under that name in his collection belong to this genus. Further, the name ‘in- 
ornata Say’ does not appear in his key to the species of Saperda (LeConte, 
1873a). Horn (1878), in his key to the species of Mecas, included the name 
‘inornata, applying it to the species previously described by LeConte as ‘satur- 
nina, which Horn regarded as a synonym of ‘inornata.’ However, Blanchard 
(1887) found two species differing in claw structure standing under the name 
‘saturnina’ in his collection. These had not been differentiated in Horn’s Key. 
This discovery prompted Horn (1888) to apply the name ‘saturnina’ LeConte 
to the species with the claws moderately deeply cleft with the inner division 
lobe-like. On this basis of distinction Gahan (1888) placed Saperda cinerea 
Newman and Mecas senescens Bates as synonyms of Mecas inornata (Say) and 
Mecas saturnina (LeConte) as a synonym of Mecas cana (Newman). We agree 
that M. saturnina and M. cana are conspecific, although in the material before 
us the two appear to be allopatric. Mecas cinerea (Newman) and M. senescens 
Bates also appear to be conspecific, but are not closely related to any species 
from the United States and thus could not under any circumstances be called 
‘inornata Say.’ Although various species of Mecas have been treated taxonomi- 
cally in the intervening years as ‘M. inornata Say’ (see synonymical bibiog- 
raphies), the species which most closely fits Say’s very brief description is M. 
confusa (described below) or, possibly, M. cineracea Casey. 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 143 


In 1924, Martin named a species MW. bicallosa on the assumption that ‘inornata 
Say’ was Saperda in the modern sense and a senior synonym of S. concolor Le- 
Conte (see above), although the arguments advanced for this decision were not 
conclusive (Martin also assumed that he was formally naming the species that 
previously had been called M. inornata; however, the species before him was from 
the Great Basin and the ranges accorded to M. inornata by Horn and Blanchard 
are to the east of this area). Martin’s placement of S. concolor LeConte as a 
synonym of S. inornata Say was accepted by Breuning (1952) and Nord and 
Knight (1970). These latter appealed to the International Commission on 
Zoological Nomenclature to use its plenary powers to designate as neotype of 
Saperda inornata Say the type of Saperda concolor unicolor Felt and Joutel, 
and place ‘inornata’ on the Official List of Specific Names in Zoology. While 
such an action would eliminate some nomenclatural confusion in the genus Mecas, 
its impact on the literature of the North American Saperda will be unfortunate. 
Proposing to relegate the name ‘inornata Say’ to the list of nomina dubia might 
have been a preferable solution to the problem. 


DISTRIBUTION 


The known species of Mecas occur in the area from western Canada to south- 
eastern United States, Mexico, and Guatemala. Of the 15 species recognized by 
us, five are restricted to northern and central Mexico and another ranges into 
Guatemala; six occur in both the United States and Mexico and three are thus 
far known only from the United States. 

A single species, M. bicallosa, is found west of the Rocky Mountains, occupy- 
ing the Great Basin and extending into British Columbia and northern Baja 
California. Most of the species occurring in the United States are found in 
either the southeastern and/or southwestern portions of the country. Only three 
species, M. femoralis, M. marginella, and M. confusa, are not yet known from 
Mexico but probably only M. femoralis does not occur there. The most widely 
distributed species, M. rotundicollis, ranges from Costa Rica to Kansas ana 
Arizona. Of the remaining four species common to both countries, M. cana 
saturnina, M. pergrata, and M. cineracea apparently occur only in northeastern 
Mexico but are more widely distributed in the United States. The other species, 
M. menthae, ranges from Distrito Federal north along the western slope of 
the Sierra Madre to Arizona and New Mexico. Five of the six Mexican species, 
M. sericea, M. humeralis, M. cinerea, M. cirrosa, and M. ambigena are apparently 
largely restricted to central Mexico from Chihuahua and San Luis Potosi to 
Puebla. The sixth, WM. obereoides, extends into Guatemala. 

In many respects the distribution of Mecas is comparable to that of Elytro- 
leptus (Linsley, 1962; Chemsak and Linsley, 1965). Of the 17 species of Elytro- 
leptus, 9 are known only from Mexico, 7 from the United States and Mexico, 


144 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


and one from the United States only. The majority of the species, as in Mecas, 
are found in central and northern Mexico and southwestern United States. Since 
nothing is known of the biology of the species of Elytroleptus, the significance 
of the distributional similarity, if any, is not evident. 


FORM AND COLORATION 


Most of the species of Mecas are concolorous with the integument black and 
densely clothed with pale recumbent pubescence. A few of the species, M. fem- 
oralis, M. pergrata, and M. cinerea frequently or always possess reddish femora 
and the latter two often have the elytra and/or pronotum partly reddish. Some 
of the members of the genus are distinctive by the narrow, densely pubescent 
white bands on the suture and epipleurae of the elytra. 

The most striking divergence from the typical appearance is to be found in 
M. sericea, M. rotundicollis, and M. obereoides. The first of these, M. sericea, 
is definitely lycid-like in aspect usually possessing two lateral dark bands at 
the base and apex of the elytra. The basal band may be reduced or absent 
and occasionally both bands are lacking. Since this species is mimetic, the 
variation in color is probably an expression of resemblance to different lycid 
models within the range of the species. Lycus sallei Gorham is a possible model 
with two dark elytral bands and we have another similarly marked Lycus from 
Sinaloa and Colima. 

Mecas rotundicollis is unquestionably a lampyrid mimic throughout most 
of its range, although in some areas a cantharid may be the model. As is the case 
in M. sericea, M. rotundicollis apparently mimics different species of models 
in different parts of its range. Variation is expressed primarily by the presence 
or absence of yellow pubescence on the apical abdominal sternites and yellow 
pubescent bands on the suture and epipleurae of the elytra. We have been unable 
to find a geographical trend in these characteristics but most of the available 
specimens from Arizona lack the yellow pubescence. 

The third species, M. obereoides, may be involved in a mimetic ring with a 
cantharid model. Very little variation in color is expressed in this species but 
it is one of the most distinctive in the genus. Field studies will be necessary to 
confirm involvement with mimicry. 

The remaining species of Mecas are all quite similar in form and coloration. 
Differences between species involve such characteristics as tarsal claw structure, 
number of glabrous calluses on the pronotum, and relative lengths of antennal 
segments. 


BIOLOGY 


Little has been recorded on the biology of species of Mecas. The most complete 
accounts known to us are those of Baerg (1921) and Stride and Warwick (1962). 
Baerg’s report describes injury to Jerusalem artichokes in Arkansas and probably 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 145 


refers to M. cana saturnina (LeConte) or the species named below as Mecas 
confusa, new species. Baerg’s account, under the name “Mecas inornata Say” 
is as follows: 


This beetle, half an inch long, of a light gray color, is a girdler that attacks arti- 
choke (Helianthus tuberosus). The beetles begin ovipositing early in July. The females 
when laying eggs girdle the main stem about six inches from the top. Two girdles are 
made, about 1-144 inches apart. Immediately above the lower girdle is the egg punc- 
ture. This is exactly similar to the method followed by the Raspberry cane girdler 
(Oberea bimaculata). The girdles are not clean cuts such as we find in woody plants, 
but rather a series of holes encircling the stem. Apparently one female will deposit 
in a large number of plants. In spite of the fact that only a few beetles could be 
located, practically all the plants in the field were attacked in the course of a few 
days. 

As a result of the injury, the leader in the plant dies and the plant develops a 
bushy type of branching. 

The young larvae upon hatching begin to feed between the girdles and later 
proceed towards the base of the plant. They confine their injury largely to the pith. 
Apparently under certain weather conditions the artichoke is not well fitted as a 
host plant. In only one out of four or five plants showing egg punctures was there 
a full grown larva. In most of the other plants the larva had begun to feed and 
some time later died, presumably it had been injured by the growing stalk. 

The larvae attain full growth, that is about seven-eights of an inch in length, 
some time in November. At this time the larvae are found at the very base of the 
stalk, about two inches below the surface of the ground, in an enlargement of the 
tunnel which has been padded with fine bits of pulp. 

The pupal stage has not been observed but since the adults appear early in July, 
the larvae will presumably pupate some time in May or early in June. 

It seems reasonable to assume that this species will attack most of the species in 
the genus Helianthus. None of these were near the artichokes, and no data have been 
secured. The only host plant other than artichoke that could be located is the 
common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) . 


The observations of Stride and Warwick were made on M. saturnina in Aus- 
tralia where that species had been introduced as a biological control agent for 
Xanthium (Wilson, 1960). The habits as they reported are almost identical with 
Baerg’s account and an additional observation was the plugging of the oviposition 
hole with a gummy substance after the single egg had been laid. Stride and 
Warwick advance a hypothesis whereby the double-girdling behavior of M. 
saturnina may be regarded as a device originally evolved to permit the use of 
succulent green shoots of otherwise woody plants as food for cerambycid larvae. 
Presumably, it has been retained in M. saturnina because it promotes advan- 
tageous changes in the herbaceous host plant attacked, possibly increased 
pithiness. 

Earlier reports also refer to stem- and root-boring habits of Mecas (Riley, 
1880; Beutenmuller, 1896; Leng and Hamilton, 1896). Most aspects of adult be- 
havior are lacking from the older literature but Townsend (1884) reported that 


146 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


‘Mecas inornata’ takes wing and flies away when it observes someone approach- 
ing, but drops to the ground and feigns death when unexpectedly disturbed. 

Adults of M. menthae, new species were found in numbers by their collectors 
on the upper leaves of the mint, Agastache, during the day. 


Host RELATIONSHIPS 


Precise host data for most species of Mecas are lacking. In part this results 
from uncertainty regarding the identity of the species of Mecas associated with 
published host records and in part from the fact that most records, both pub- 
lished and unpublished, are based upon collections of adults from plants and 
not upon reared material. Nevertheless, there is an interesting consistency among 
the records that are available. With very few exceptions the plants involved 
are weedy, herbaceous composites which have special chemical characteristics 
expressed in terms of aromatic, medicinal, irritant, or toxic properties. The 
list of known or suspected hosts based upon field collections, with notations of 
some of their properties as reported by Blake (1951) and Kingsbury (1967) is 
as follows: 


COMPOSITAE 


Ambrosia (Ragweed). 
A. artemisiifolia Linnaeus (Common Ragweed). One of the most widespread causes 
of hayfever. 
Artemisia (Sagebrush). 
A. tridentata Nuttall (Big Sage). Used medicinally by Indians and early white 
settlers in the West; a hay fever plant; toxic to livestock if eaten in excess. 
Aster (Aster). 
A. tanacetifolius Humboldt, Bonpland, & Kunth (Tansyleaf Aster). Used medic- 
inally by the Indians; some species of aster absorb Selenium and become toxic. 
Baileya (Baileya). 
B. multiradiata Harvey & Gray (Desert Marigold). Causes mortality in sheep, par- 
ticularly, but not exclusively, on over-grazed land. 
Gaillardia (Blanket-flower) . 
G. pulchella Fougeroux de Bondaroy. A related species, G. pinnatifida Torrey. 
was used by the Hopi Indians as a diuretic. 
Guardiola (Guardiola). 
G. tulocarpus Gray. 
Helenium (Sneezeweed). 
H. hoopesti Gray (Orange Sneezeweed). Contains a toxic glucoside (dugaldin) 
which causes spewing sickness in sheep. 
H. microcephalum WDeCandolle (Sneezeweed). Toxic to livestock. 
H. tenuifolium Nuttall (Bitter Sneezeweed). Toxic to livestock and suspected of 
poisoning humans. 
Helianthus (Suntlower). 
H. annuus Linnaeus (Common Sunflower). Toxic to cattle in large amounts; the 
seeds are edible. 
H. tuberosus Linnaeus (Jerusalem Artichoke). Roots edible. 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 147 


Verbesina (Crown-beard). 
V. encelioides (Cavanilles) Bentham & Hooker (Golden Crownbeard). Used by 
Indians and White pioneers in the West for treatment of boils and skin disease; 
Hopis reported to bathe in water in which plant has been soaked to relieve pain 
of spider bites. 
Xanthium (Cocklebur). 


X. spinosum Linnaeus (Spiny Cocklebur). Seeds and seedlings contain a glucoside 
(Xanthostrumarin) poisonous to swine and poultry. 


LABIATAE 


Agastache (Giant-hyssop) 
A. species (Horsemint). 


Genus Mecas LeConte 


Mecas LEContTE, 1852, Jour. Acad. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 155; 1873, Smith- 
sonian Misc. Coll., no. 265, p. 347; Horn, 1878, Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 7, p. 44; 
Bates. 1881, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 203; LeContTEe and 
Horn, 1883, Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 507, p. 332; Lrenc and Hamiurton, 1896, 
Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 23, pp. 151, 152; Casry, 1913, Memoirs on the 
Coleoptera, vol. 4, p. 360; BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, p. 138. 


Form elongate, usually parallel. Head with front convex, interantennal area 
usually concave; mandibles rather short, apices curved, acute; palpi slender, 
maxillary pair longer than labial; eyes rather small, finely faceted, deeply emar- 
ginate, upper lobe small; antennae usually slender, sparsely or densely fringed 
with long hairs beneath, particularly on basal segments; third segment usually 
longer than first, fourth subequal to or shorter than third, outer segments short or 
long. Pronotum wider than long, sides usually rounded; disk variably pubescent, 
often with glabrous calluses; prosternum short, intercoxal process narrow, 
expanded at apex, coxal cavities closed behind; mesosternum with coxal cavities 
open; metasternum with episternum broad in front, narrowing behind. Legs 
short; intermediate tibiae with a dorsal sinus; tarsal claws bifid. Abdomen 
normally segmented; last sternite deeply impressed in the male, linearly im- 
pressed in the female. 

Type spectEs. Phytoecia femoralis Haldeman (monobasic). 

This genus is distinctive from others in its tribe by the proportions of the 
antennal segments, the frequent presence of dorsal calluses on the pronotum, the 
shape of the metepisternum, and by the nature of the impressions of the last 
abdominal sternite, which are concave in the male and linear in the female. Many 
of the species resemble Saperda but the bifid claws will readily separate them. 

There are at present 15 known species of Mecas assignable to three subgenera, 
all occurring in the New World. 


148 


2(1). 


4(3). 


5(4). 


6(5). 


7(6). 


8(4). 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


KEY TO THE KNOWN SPECIES OF THE GENUS Mecas 


Pronotum with sides rounded or subparallel; elytra not expanded apically 


behind! middle; appearance’ not ly ciionn) 22 Ea 2 
Pronotum with sides obtusely produced at middle; elytra expanding slightly 

toward apices; integument yellow and black; appearance lycid-like. Mecas 

(Pannychis). 14-20 mm. Chihuahua to Veracruz _..__ SS M. sericea 


Pronotum not densely fringed with short, erect, golden pubescence, erect hairs 
moderately long; elytral apices broadly rounded or rotundate-truncate; 
abdomen with pubescence of sternites unicolorous. Mecas, sensu stricto. 3 

Pronotum densely fringed with short, erect, golden pubescence with scattered 
long setae intermixed, dorsal surface with a pair of longitudinal vittae on 
each side of middle composed of short, appressed, golden pubescence; 
integument usually concolorous golden yellow, less commonly mottled 
or vittate with black, rarely wholly black; elytral apices angulate, obliquely 
truncate or emarginate; abdomen often with last three sternites margined 
laterally with longitudinal bands of yellowish-white pubescence suggesting 
luminescent organs of a lampyrid. Mecas (Dylobolus). 8-14 mm. South- 
western WUmited states! to) Costar Rica ses ee eee M. rotundicollis 

Pronotal pubescence dense, appressed, obscuring surface, intact or broken by 
well defined black polished callosites and usually also a median impunctate 
area. On ISK... i225 22 oe eee 4 

Pronotal pubescence very sparse, erect, not obscuring surface which has five 
tubercles, one median, two antemedian, and two lateral, the surface red to 
yellow, concolorous or margined laterally with black and/or with black 
spots on the median or median and lateral tubercles. 8-10 mm. Sinaloa and 


San) JouismPotosiatoy Guatemalae = ee ee M. obereoides 
Pronotum with pubescence intact, not interrupted by polished black callosities. 5 
Pronotum with at least two polished black callosities and usually a median 

elongate impunctate “area on) isk) eee 8 


Pronotum and elytra with concolorous pubescence which obscures the surface; 
Stemnum) juniformly, densely, pubescent) = ———————E—EEs 6 

Pronotum and elytra with longitudinal bands of dense, appressed, often yel- 
lowish pubescence at middle and sides, remaining pubescence not completely 
obscuring surface; sternum margined with a row of dense, appressed, 
yellowish pubescence. Length, 6.5-8 mm. Southeastern United States to 


IN GW, VICxXI COM == 28 ee ee eee M. marginella 
Tarsal claws with inner tooth much smaller than outer one. Smaller species, 
6=0iimm-ain length: (fig. Ub), 2-2 Ee ee if 
Tarsal claws with inner tooth almost as long as outer one. Length, 10-14 mm. 
INansasMto.wMexas) (lig. 1a)).p «tet Eee M. confusa 
Femora always reddish; pubescence finer, not completely obscuring surface. 
Length, 6-8 mm. Southeastern United States. SS M. femoralis 


Femora always black; pubescence thick, obscuring surface. Length, 6-11 mm. 
Southeastern United States to Arizona, Colorado, and northeastern Mexico, 
etait AS ata cote he le ee M. cineracea 


ANCA: <2 82... 5 eee 9 
Pronotum with two rounded glabrous calluses in addition to elongate median 
imnipunctate area. ee EEE EE = UG) 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 149 


a b Cc 


FicurE 1. Some variations in the form of the tarsal claws in the genus Mecas. 


9(8). Form elongate, elytra about 3 times as long as broad; antennae at least as long 
as body; elytra uniformly pubescent, margins and suture not distinctly pubes- 

cent. Length, 8-13 mm. San Luis Potosi to Morelos and Nayarit. __. M. cinerea 
Form rather stout, short, elytra about 244 times as long as broad; antennae 
shorter than body; elytra with margins and suture densely pale pubescent. 
Length, 6-12 mm. Great Plains to southeastern United States, New 


Mexico; and northeastern: Wiexico. 2 == ene M. pergrata 
10(8). Tarsal claws with inner tooth short, obtuse, lobe-like (fig. Ic), 0. 11 
Marcoleclaws with inner tooth acute: spine=likes eee ee 12 


11(10). Antennae shorter than body, densely clothed beneath with long curved hairs, 
segments robust, flattened; elytra uniformly gray pubescent. Length, 10.5- 

AS emiinen Gea Wat oven! @Uuereter@: se eee eee M. cirrosa 
Antennae longer than body, sparsely clothed beneath with long erect hairs, 
segments slender; elytra broadly clothed with brownish pubescence along 


epipleurae; humeri glabrous. Length, 10.5-13 mm. Jalisco. —___ M. humeralis 
12(10). Antennae much shorter than body, outer segments short. — 13 
Antennae at least as long as body, outer segments elongate. = ti«i2“SH 


13(12). Appressed pubescence gray, uniform on elytra; pronotum ieee Sains 
punctate; elytra lacking long erect dark hairs over apical one half. Length, 
10-15 mm. Washington to northern Baja California and Colorado. __ M. bicallosa 
Appressed pubescence brownish, denser on margins and suture of elytra; 
pronotum coarsely, confluently punctate; elytra densely clothed with dark 
erect hairs over apical one half. Length, 9-10 mm. Durango to Mexico. 
tet ee, | a a ee ee eee M. ambigena 
14(12). Elytra sparsely, separately punctate, lacking long erect hairs; pronotal calluses 
Siiallbemediansampunctates areas Via Sle. ee 15 
Elytra coarsely, contiguously punctate, densely clothed with long erect hairs; 
pronotal calluses large, median impunctate area distinct. Length, 8-13 mm. 


AmizonaeiomNayanitrandmDistrito) Hecdetals seems sess ss een M. menthae 
15(14). Elytra with distinct longitudinal pubescent bands along margins and suture. 
encth-— 10-16) mma shloriday = ee M. cana cana 


Elytra uniformly grayish or yellowish pubescent, suture and margins without 
pubescent bands. Length, 10-16 mm. Eastern United States to South 
Dakotasangenortheastenmel lexi Cp eee M. cana saturnina 


Subgenus Pannychis Thomson 


Pannychis THomson, 1864, Systema cerambycidarum, p. 127;1868, Physis, vol. 2, p. 197; 
LAcorDaIRE, 1872, Genera des coléoptéres, vol. 9, pp. 882, 889; BaTEs, 1881, Biologia 
Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 205; GimMmour, 1962, Rev. Biol. Trop., 
vol. 10, pp. 125, 137. 


150 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


XG 
: Ss 


Ficure 2, Mecas (Pannychis) sericea (Thomson), ¢. 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 151 


Form moderate to large, lycid-like. Antennae short, not extending beyond 
third abdominal segment, segments not gray pubescent. Pronotum broader than 
long, sides obtusely produced at middle; disk convex, sparsely punctate, pubes- 
cence not obscuring surface. Elytra slightly expanded behind middle, disk 
costate, pubescence bicolored. Legs with tarsal claws with long inner tooth. 
Abdomen with last sternite impressed at apex in females. 

Type SPECIES. Pannychis sericeus Thomson (monobasic). 

The lycid-like form and coloration and the obtusely produced pronotal sides 
make this subgenus very distinctive. A single species is known from Mexico. 


Mecas (Pannychis) sericea (Thomson). 

(Figures 2, 3.) 

Pannychis sericeus THOMSON, 1864, Systema cerambycidarum, p. 127; 1868, Physis, vol. 2, 
p. 197; Bates, 1881, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 205; Gimrmour, 
1962, Rev. Biol. Trop., vol. 10, p. 137. 

Pannychis ducalis BATEs, 1881, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 205; 
Gitmour, 1962, Rev. Biol. Trop., vol. 10, p. 137. New synonymy. 

Mate. Form moderate sized to rather large, elytra slightly expanding toward 
apices; integument yellowish, antennae black, legs variable, tibiae usually black, 
femora often partially black, head usually with 3 black bands over vertex and 
behind eyes, pronotum usually with 3 longitudinal bands joining at base and 
broad black bands at sides beneath, elytra yellow or with basal and broad apical 
black bands, basal bands often reduced or lacking, beneath variably colored. 
Head with front convex, coarsely, shallowly punctate; interantennal area con- 
cave, median line deep; vertex shallowly punctate; pubescence dense, appressed 
on cheeks, sparse, short, and suberect on front; antennae extending to about 
third abdominal segment, segments all clothed with very short, dark, depressed 
pubescence, basal segments with a few long erect setae beneath, third segment 
subequal in length to first, fourth shorter than third, remaining segments grad- 
ually decreasing in length, eleventh appendiculate, segments from fifth with 
vague longitudinal poriferous areas. Pronotum broader than long, sides obtusely 
produced at middle; disk convex, almost impunctate; pubescence dense, golden, 
appressed at sides, a little sparser on disk with a few long, erect hairs inter- 
spersed; prosternum sparsely pubescent; meso- and metasternum moderately 
densely pubescent, distinctly punctate at sides. Elytra about 3 times as long 
as broad, slightly expanding behind middle; each elytron lightly bicostate, 
epipleurae vertical; punctures at base coarse, dense, becoming fine and sparser 
toward apex; pubescence short, dense, subdepressed, colored as integument, 
longer suberect hairs present basally; apices rounded. Legs finely pubescent; 
tarsal claws with inner tooth slightly shorter than outer. Abdomen finely 
moderately pubescent; last sternite deeply impressed for most of its length. 
Length, 14-19 mm. 

FEMALE. Form more robust, elytra slightly more expanded behind middle. 


‘(uosmoy) varzdas (s1yIKuung) SpIayY JO BOUAIINIIO UMOUY “¢ AWAY 
‘uolsstded Aq paonpoiday ‘osPITYD Jo AjIsIOATUL) 24} Aq L¢61 WysAdoo dew aseg 


Sir 


NOILD3°Ou¥d V3NY-1VNDI S/3NNOB 
YNOLNOD 1004 OOO! » 


S¥313NOTIM OOF ooc o0z 201 
= 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


= 


> 
s37/Mo0e 00; 


Se 
90) 


31vos 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


152 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 153 


Antennae extending to about first abdominal segment. Abdomen with last 
sternite linearly impressed, concave at apex, apex broadly V-shaped. Length, 
14-20 mm. 

TYPE LocALITy. Of ‘sericeus,’ Mexico; ‘ducalis,’ Orizaba, Mexico. 

RANGE. Chihuahua, Mexico to Veracruz (fig. 3). 

FLIGHT PERIOD. July to October. 

Remarks. This striking species undoubtedly is one of the lycid mimics. 
It is variable in coloration and, as is found among members of Elytroleptus 
(Chemsak and Linsley, 1965), all yellow individuals occur as well as ones with 
only the apices of the elytra black or with both the apices and base black. It 
would not be surprising to encounter individuals with all black elytra. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. MEXICO. Chihuahua: 1 2, 3 miles SE. of Temoris, 
VII-25-69 (R. C. Gardner, C. S. Glaser, T. A. Sears); Jalisco: 1 ¢, 10 miles 
SW. of Tecalitlan, X-10-64 (A. E. Michelbacher); 1 ¢, Cuidad Guzman, Jalisco, 
IX-15-63 (M. C. Colorado); Morelos: 1 4, Tequesquitengo, VII-15-61 (R. 
& K. Dreisbach); Michoacan: 1 2, near Morelia, IX-5-52 (G. H. Dieke); 
Guerrero: 1 2, Iguala, VII-21-62 (H. E. Milliron); 1 2, 10 miles N. of Mercula, 
VIII-26-58 (E. L. Mockford); 1 6, Thaxmalac, IX-22-42 (W. F. Fosberg) ; 
Puebla: 1 6, 19 miles NW. of Cacaloapan, VII-30-65 (W. A. Foster). 


Subgenus Dylobolus Thomson 


Dylobolus THomson, 1868, Physis, vol. 2, p. 195; LAcorpatrE, 1872, Genera des coléopteéres, 
vol. 9, pp. 897, 900. 


Form slender, elongate. Antennae slender, third segment slightly curved. 
Pronotum with sides rounded, disk densely fringed with short, erect, golden 
pubescence. Elytra with apices angulate, usually obliquely emarginate. Legs 
with tarsal claws with inner tooth almost as long as outer one. Abdomen 
frequently with yellowish appressed pubescence at sides of apical sternites. 

Type species. Dylobolus rotundicollis Thomson (monobasic). 

This subgenus differs from the others by the pubescence of the pronotum 
and emarginate or truncate elytral apices. The single known species is a 
lampyrid mimic. 


Mecas (Dylobolus) rotundicollis (Thomson). 
(Figures 4, 5, 6.) 


Dylobolus rotundicollis THomson, 1868, Physis, vol. 2, p. 196. 

Mecas rotundicollis, Bates, 1881, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 205; 
BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, p. 148. 

Mecas ruficollis Horn, 1878, Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 7, p. 44; Bates, 1881, Biologia 
Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 205; Lenc and Hamirton 1896, Trans. 
American Ent. Soc., vol. 23, pp. 152; CAsEy, 1913, Memoirs on the Coleoptera, vol. 4, 
Das02: 

Mecas ruficollis morpha mediomaculata BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, 
vol. 27, p. 149. New synonymy. 


154 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 4. Mecas (Dylobolus) rotundicollis (Thomson), ¢. 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 155 


Mecas rotundicollis morpha ruficollis, BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Belgique, vol. 27, 
p. 149. 

Mecas laticeps Bates, 1881, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 204; 
BrREUNING, 1955; Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, p. 151. New synonymy. 

Mecas laticeps morpha sutureflava BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, 
p. 151. New synonymy. 

Mecas laticeps morpha mediopunctata BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, 
p. 151. New synonymy. 

Mecas mexicana BATES, 1881, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 204. 

Mecas rotundicollis morpha mexicana, BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, 
vol. 27, p. 149. 

Mecas vitticollis CAsEY, 1913, Memoirs on the Coleoptera, vol. 4, p. 362. 

Mecas laticeps morpha vitticollis, BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, 
Deez. 


Mate. Form moderate sized, elongate, sides parallel; color black, head 
and pronotum orange, usually with dark spots or bands, legs often orange, 
thoracic sterna often orange, abdomen usually with broad bands of yellow 
appressed pubescence at sides of last three sternites, elytra frequently with 
narrow bands of appressed yellowish pubescence down suture and epipleurae. 
Head rather small; front convex, median line extending from clypeus to neck; 
interantennal area concave; vertex moderately coarsely, densely punctate; 
pubescence dense, yellowish, appressed with short, dark, erect hairs numerously 
interspersed; antennae shorter than body, scape finely, very densely punctate, 
third segment longer than first, fourth shorter than third, fifth subequal to first, 
segments from sixth gradually decreasing in length, scape rather densely clothed 
with short subdepressed hairs, underside of segments densely clothed with short, 
pale, appressed pubescence, basal segments with a few long erect hairs beneath. 
Pronotum usually broader than long, sides rounded; disk convex, sparsely to 
rather densely punctate; pubescence usually dense, consisting of short, dense, 
subappressed, longitudinal bands, one on each side of middle and at lateral 
margins, longer erect hairs numerously interspersed; prosternum densely pubes- 
cent; meso- and metasternum finely, densely punctate at middle, coarsely at 
sides, pubescence dense. Elytra over three times longer than broad; suture 
and epipleurae usually with narrow bands of appressed yellow pubescence; 
punctures rather coarse, dense, becoming finer and sparser toward apex; surface 
clothed with fine appressed pubescence, short, recurved hairs numerously inter- 
spersed, apices obliquely truncate. Legs finely, densely pubescent; tarsal claws 
with inner tooth almost as long as outer. Abdomen elongate, densely pubes- 
cent; last three sternites usually clothed with broad yellow bands at sides; last 
sternite deeply impressed for most of its length. Length, 9-16 mm. 

FEMALE. Form similar, more robust. Antennae slightly shorter than in male. 
Abdomen with last sternite linearly impressed for its entire length; last tergite 
strongely, obtusely conical at apex. Length, 10-19 mm. 


156 


CALIFORNIA 


ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


to 8) 
4 
~ 
ise) 
u 
—- 
a 
>} 
= 
SI 
S 
ae} 
> 
— 
3 
u 
vo 
~~ 
{a} 
4 
Orr 
uw) 
vu 
!- 
~~ ee 
g & 
a > 
Eg 
om 
po 3:} 
Sl 4s 
me fe 
io) 
=o 
one 
Sa 
Sto 
Si 
~~ 2 
oS a 
o 
ee el 
rare 
OH 
Lr 
mE 
So 
no» 
See 
6b wo 
Ee 
= 8 
fe 
i 
na 
gy = 
wz Oo 
= 
2's 
my 
fy 
oO 
a) 
~ 


VoL. XX XIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 157 


Type LocaLity. Of ‘rotundicollis, Mexico; ‘ruficollis, Texas; ‘laticeps,’ 
Guanajuato, Mexico; ‘mexicana,’ Izucar, Mexico; ‘vitticollis, Durango City; 
‘mediomaculata, Guerrerro; ‘sutureflava, Temax, Yucatan; ‘mediopunctata,’ 
Mexico. 

RANGE. Oklahoma to Arizona, Texas, and south to Costa Rica (fig. 6). 

FLIGHT PERIOD. May to December. 

Host pLrants. Adults have been collected on flowers of Guardiola tulocarpa 
(Compositae) and on Eysenhardtia polystachya (Leguminosae). 

Remarks. This species is a lampyrid mimic, resembling different models in 
different parts of its range, as is evident by the polychromatism expressed in the 
specimens at hand. These color differences are expressed especially in the presence 
or absence of yellowish longitudinal sutural and epipleural bands on the elytra and 
in the yellowish apical sternites of the abdomen. There are varying combinations 
of these characters but we have been unable to correlate them geographically, 
although this might be possible with larger series of specimens and model-mimic 
associations over the entire range. 

In addition to the above differences, individuals also vary considerably in 
size, color of head, pronotum, sternum, and legs. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. UNITED STATES. Oklahoma: 1 ¢, 1 2, Edmond, 
VII-9-57 (D. Alexander); Arizona: 2 ¢4, Dry Canyon, Sands Ranch, SE. 
end Whetstone Mts., Cochise Co., VII-10-52 (H. B. Leech, J. W. Green) ; 
1 2, Tombstone, VIII-13-40 (E. S. Ross); 1 2, Madera Canyon, Pima Co., 
IX-1-54 (Menke & Stange); 1 6, 5 mi. W. Portal, Chiricahua Mts., VIII- 
12-58 (P. Opler). Texas: 1 6, New Braunfels; 1 ¢, 1 2, San Antonio, May, 
VI-11-36 (C. D. Orchard); 1 4, 13 mi. W. of San Marcos, Comal Co., VI-24- 
25-61 (R. L. Westcott); 1 ¢, Brownsville; 1 ¢, Van Horn, V-23-32 (E. G. 
Linsley). MEXICO. Tamaulipas: 1 ¢, Ciudad Victoria, VI-8-51 (P. D. 
Hurd); 1 ¢, Rio Corona, 21.3 mi. N. of Cuidad Victoria, X-25-65 (G. E. Ball, 
D. R. Whitehead). Nuevo Leon: 1 6,2 22, Monterrey, XI-30-65, X-12-52. 
San Luis Potosi: 1 2°, El Huizache, VIII-22-61 (R. & K. Dreisbach). Veracruz: 
3 66,1 2, Veracruz, XI-1-57, IX-24-61 (R. & K. Dreisbach). Chihuahua: 1 ¢, 
3 mi. E. of Temoris, VIII-26-69 (Sears, Gardner, Glaser). Durango: 1 ?, Encino, 
VII-27-47, 6200 ft. (Schramel); 14, 11 mi. W. of Durango, VIII-2-64, 7000 it. 
(L. Kelton); 1 6, 7 mi. W. of Durango, VII-23-64 (W. R. M. Mason); 1 4, 25 
mi. S. of Durango, VII-24-64 (L. Kelton); 1 6,2 22,8 mi.S. of Canutillo, VII- 
9-51, on flowers of Guardiola tulocarpa (P.D. Hurd). Hidalgo: 1 4, Ajacuba, VI- 
21-37 (M. A. Embury); 2 66,2 22, Pachuca, VI-15-35, VII-10-37 (Embury), 
VII-31-35 (Embury); 1°, Zimapan, VII-14-68 (M. Wasbauer, J. Slansky). Dis- 
trito Federal: 2 22, Temascaltepec, 1931 (G. B. Hinton). Nayarit: 6 6¢, 5 
2 2, Tepic, IX-13-57 (R. & K. Dreisbach), IX-15-17-53 (B. Malkin), IX-24-47 
(B. Malkin); 1 2, Campostella, IX-16-57 (R. & K. Dreisbach). Jalisco: 1%, 13 


158 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH Serr. 


SCALE 
200 600 800 Jo0o MILES 
= T om oS 
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 KILOMETERS 


LAMBERT AZIMUTHAL EQUAL-AREA PROJECTION 


Base map copyright 1961 by the University of Chicago. Reproduced by permission. 


Ficure 6. Known occurrence of Mecas (Dylobolus) rotundicollis (Thomson). 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 159 


mi. N. of Chapala, VIII-1-63 (P. J. Spangler); 1¢, San Juan Lagos, VII-27-51, 
on Eysenhardtia polystachya (P. D. Hurd); 1 2, Tlaquepaque, VI-28-45 (N.C. 
H. Krauss); 1 2, Ajijic, VIT-28-54 (Cazier, Gertsch, Bradts); 1 6, 17 mi. SSW. 
of Guadalajara, VIII-22-70 (M. & J. Wasbauer). Colima: 1 ¢, Pine zone, SE. 
Slope Mt. Colima, XII-48 (E. S. Ross). Michoacan: 1 ¢, 5 km. W. of Zacapu, 
VII-13-51 (H. E. Evans); 1 ¢, Morelia, [X-30-45; 1 ¢, 6 mi. NW. of Quiroga, 
VII-11-63 (Parker, Stange); 1 4, 12, Quiroga, VII-15-56 (R. & K. Dreis- 
bach); 2 6¢, 1 @%, Tuxpan, ITX-6-03 (McClendon), IX-18-57 (Scullen). 
Morelos: 2 ¢¢,1 2, Hujintlan, VIII-22-56 (R. & K. Dreisbach); 1 2, Lake 
Tequesquitengo, IX-13-57 (Schullen); 2 ¢4, Cuernavaca, X-02, X-29-57 
(Dreisbach); 1 2, Morelos, Oct. Guerrero: 1 2, Rio Balsas (Wickham). 
Puebla: 1 6, 3 mi. N. of Petalcingo, VIII-21-63 (Parker, Stange); 1 6, 55 mi. 
S. of Acatlan, VII-30-63 (J. Doyen); 1 ¢, Tehuacan, VI-23-51 (Evans); 1 4, 
19 mi. NW. of Cacaloapan, VII-30-63 (Foster). Oaxaca: 8 44,1 2, Oaxaca, 
VII-20-37 (Embury); 2 64,1 2, Oaxaca, IX-13-20-47 (Malkin); 1 4,1 2, 
Monte Alban, VIII-3-54 (P. & C. Vaurie) , X-12-63 (A. E. Michelbacher) ; 2 2 2, 
18 mi. NW. of Totolapan, VII-28-63 (Doyen, Foster); 1 2, Temescal, VII-5 
-65 (G. H. Nelson). Chiapas: 1 ?, Jct. Hwys. 190-195, VI-6-69 (H. F. How- 
den); 3 64,2 22, San Jeronimo, Volcan Tacana, X-1-10-70, XI-7-70 (E. C. 
Welling). GUATEMALA. 1 2, El Salto, Escuintla, 1934 (F. A. Bianchi). 
COSTA RICA. 1 ¢, La Pacifica, 4 km. NW. of Canas, Guanacaste, XI-17-71 
Gera. Opler). 


Subgenus Mecas sensu stricto 


Mecas LEConreE, 1852, Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, (2) vol. 2, p. 155; 1873, Smith- 
sonian Misc. Coll., vol. 11, no. 265, p. 347; BratcHLEy, 1910, Coleoptera—in Indiana, 
p. 1090; Knutr, 1946, Ohio Biol. Survey, Bull. vol. 39, p. 274. 


Form moderate sized, parallel; body usually densely clothed with appressed 
pubescence. Pronotum with or without dorsal calluses, sides broadly to narrowly 
rounded. Elytra parallel, apices rounded, disk not costate. Legs with tarsal 
claws variable, inner tooth long or short. 

TypeE species. Phytoecia femoralis Haldemen (monobasic). 

The members of this subgenus are easily recognizable by the densely pubes- 
cent body, subcylindrical and usually densely pubescent pronotum which fre- 
quently has glabrous dorsal calluses. 

Thirteen species are presently known. 


Mecas obereoides Bates. 
(Figure 7.) 


Mecas obereoides BATES, 1881, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 204, pl. 15, 
fig. 16; BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, p. 150. 

Mecas laminata Bates, 1881, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 204; 
BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, p. 150. 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


160 


‘sayegq Saploadago spdapy JO 9dUIAIINIIO UMOUY ‘/ ANSI 
‘uoisstujad Aq psonpoiday ‘oseoIyD Jo AjIsIaAIUL_) 9Y} Aq LEG] JYsIAdoD dew 


ase gq 


NOILD3FO¥d W3Y¥—-WNDI S/3NNOB 
YNOLNOD 1004 000! 
Swaiano7iM oor 


s371M00e 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 161 


Mecas laminata morpha rufobasalis BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, 

p. 150. New synonymy. 

Mecas laminata morpha discopunctata BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, 
vol. 27, p. 150. New synonymy. 

Mecas laminata morpha discoimpunctata BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, 
vol. 27, p. 150. New synonymy. 

Mate. Form moderate sized, elongate, sides parallel; color black, vertex 
of head and pronotum orange, pronotum usually with three black spots, one 
median and two lateral. Head with front convex, densely clothed with gray 
appressed pubescence which covers basal half of mandibles, erect dark hairs 
numerous on front; interantennal area convex; vertex moderately coarsely 
punctate; antennae slightly longer than body, densely gray pubescent beneath 
with a few long erect hairs present on basal segments, scape slightly shorter 
than third segment, fourth equal to third, fifth shorter than first, segments 
six to nine subequal, remaining two segments shorter. Pronotum usually a little 
broader than long, sides narrowly rounded; disk convex, middle with a usually 
black glabrous callus, frequently a vague callus present on each side of middle 
anterior to median one, two black glabrous spots present laterally; punctation 
irregular, moderately coarse; pubescence sparse, fine with a few long erect hairs 
present at sides; prosternum densely clothed with gray recumbent pubescence; 
meso- and metasternum densely clothed with gray recumbent pubescence, sides 
moderately coarsely punctate. Elytra about three times as long as broad; 
each elytron costate down middle, area between costae and suture impressed; 
punctures coarse, dense, becoming finer toward apex; pubescence short, dense, 
appressed, with longer suberect hairs numerously interspersed; apices rounded. 
Legs densely pubescent; tarsal claws with inner tooth slightly smaller than 
outer. Abdomen densely clothed with gray appressed pubescence; last sternite 
shallowly impressed for most of its length. Length, 10-14 mm. 

FEMALE. Form similar, slightly more robust. Antennae about as long as 
body. Abdomen with last sternite linearly impressed for its entire length, 
shallowly concave at middle at apex. Length, 10-15 mm. 

Type LocaLity. Of ‘obereoides, Cuernavaca, Mexico; ‘laminata, not 
restricted; ‘rufobasalis, Mexico; ‘discopunctata, Mexico; ‘discoimpunctata,’ 
Mexico. 

RANGE. San Luis Potosi and Sinaloa, Mexico to Guatemala (fig. 7). 

FLIGHT PERIOD. June to December. 

Host pLants. Unknown. 

Remarks. The sparsely pubescent orange pronotum and the dark pronotal 
spots will readily separate this species from other known species of Mecas. The 
coloration is almost constant in the series at hand. However, specimens from 
the eastern parts of Mexico tend to have dark appressed elytral pubescence while 
in those from the western portions to Guatemala this tends to be grayish. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. MEXICO. San Luis Potosi: 1 2, 30 mi. N. of 


162 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Tamazunchale, X-6-57 (H. A. Scullen). Veracruz: 2 ¢6¢, 3 2%, Veracruz, 
VIII-1-6-61 (R. & K. Dreisbach); 1 2, Jalapa, IX-28 to X-3-61 (R. & K. 
Dreisbach); 1 ¢, 1 2, Puente Nacional, VIII-3-56 (R. & K. Dreisbach), VII- 
23-24-65 (Flint & Ortiz); 2 22, San Andreas Tuxtla, X-25-57 (R. & K. 
Dreisbach); 1 ¢, 12, Hueyapan, X-30-57 (R. & K. Dreisbach); 1 4, Cerro 
Venado, Los Tuxtlas Range, XII-29-62 (Edmonds, Robinson). Sinaloa: 1 ¢, 
Venedillo, VII-31-18; 2 6 3, 20 mi. E. of Villa Union, VIII-19-64 (M. E. Irwin, 
E. I. Schlinger). Nayarit: 2 64,1 2,15 mi. N. of Tepic, VII-25-54 (Cazier, 
Gertsch, Bradts); 1 ¢, 1 2, 18 mi. N. of Tepic, VIII-16-60 (D. C. Rentz); 
3 66, Tepic, [X-21-24-53 (B. Malkin), IX-13-57 (R. & K. Dreisbach); 1 ¢, 
14 mi. E. of San Blas, VII-21-54 (Schlinger). Colima: 1 ¢, Colima (Conradt). 
Jalisco: 1 2, Puerto Los Mazos, 9 mi. NW. of Autlan, VIII-28-70 (M. & J. 
Wasbauer). Guerrero: 2 ¢¢4,1 2, Teloloapan, VIII-15-21-57 (D. Douglas) ; 
1 6,1 2,3 mi. S. of Acahuizlotla, XI-17-46 (E. C. Van Dyke); 1 ¢, Taxco, 
VITI-16-18-56 (A. E. Lewis); 1 ¢, Highway 95, 23 mi. N. of Acapulco. VII- 
30-65 (Cornell U. Mex. field party); 1 ¢, 5 mi. W. of Mex. 92, Cacahuamilpa 
Caves, VITI-16-18-56 ( A. E. Lewis). Morelos: 6 6¢,2 22%, Hujintlan, VII- 
22-56 (R. & K. Dreisbach); 1 ?, Lake Tequesquitengo, IX-13-57 (H. A. 
Scullen); 1 ¢, Tequesquitengo, VII-15-61 (Dreisbach); 1 ¢, Xochicalco, 
VII-13-61 (Dreisbach); 5 64, 1 2, Cuernavaca, VII-15-52 (G. M. Boush), 
VITI-9-13-38 (L. Lipovsky), VIII-1-6-21 Sept. (Barrett), IX-8-90 (D. De- 
long); 1 6,1 2, 22 mi. S. of Cuernavaca, [X-10-57 (Scullen); 1 ¢, 45 mi. S. 
of Cuernavaca, IX-12-57 (Scullen). Puebla: 1 ¢, 5 mi. S. of Izucar de Mata- 
moros, VIII-1-63 (Parker, Stange). Oaxaca: 1 ¢, 10 mi. NE. of Huajuapan 
de Leon, VI-27-65 (Doyen). Chiapas: 1 ?, Santo Domingo, 15 mi. SE. of 
Simojovel, VII-8-15-58 (J. A. Chemsak); 6 64,9 2, San Jeronimo, Volcan 
Tacana, VIII-10 to X-12-70 (E. C. Welling). GUATEMALA. 1 2, El Salto, 
Escuintla, 1934 (F. Bianchi). 


Mecas marginella LeConte. 


Mecas marginella LECoNTE, 1873, Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 11, no. 264, p. 239; Horn, 
1878, Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 23, p. 152; Bratcutry, 1910, Coleoptera—in 
Indiana, p. 1090; CAsry, 1913, Mem. Coleoptera, vol. 4, p. 361; BreuNntNG, 1955, Mem. 
Soc. Roy. Belgique, vol. 27, p. 147. 

Mate. Form small, subparallel; color black, pronotum with three longi- 
tudinal bands of yellowish to whitish appressed pubescence, elytra with narrow 
bands of pale pubescence down suture and lateral margins. Head with front 
convex, deeply punctate, densely clothed with appressed pale pubescence, long 
erect hairs numerous; interantennal area broadly concave; vertex coarsely, 
densely punctate; antennae a little longer than body, very sparsely gray pubes- 
cent beneath, long erect hairs numerous on basal segments, third segment longer 
than scape, fourth subequal to third, fifth shorter than fourth. Pronotum 


Vot. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 163 


broader than long, sides subparallel; punctures moderately coarse, dense, calluses 
absent; pubescence dense, appressed, lateral bands broad, yellowish, median 
band narrower, usually whitish, remainder of surface finely pubescent, long, 
erect hairs numerous; prosternum densely pubescent; meso- and metasternum 
densely pubescent, rather coarsely punctate at sides, metepisternum yellow pubes- 
cent over posterior half. Elytra over twice as long as broad; punctures coarse, 
close, becoming finer toward apex; pubescence between longitudinal bands fine, 
appressed, with longer erect hairs numerously interspersed; apices rounded. 
Legs finely, densely pubescent; tarsal claws with teeth subequal in length. 
Abdomen densely pubescent, narrowly yellow at sides of apical sternites; last 
sternite deeply impressed for its entire length. Length, 6.5—-8 mm. 

FEMALE. Form and size similar. Antennae about as long as body. Abdomen 
with last sternite shallowly impressed near apex. Length, 6.5-8 mm. 

TYPE LOCALITY. Western States and Texas. 

RANGE. Southeastern United States to New Mexico. 

FLIGHT PERIOD. March to July. 

Host PLANts. Unknown. One specimen was collected on Colubrina texensis 
(Rhamnaceae) in Texas, but it is very unlikely that this shrub is a host. 

REMARKS. The absence of pronotal calluses and the distinctive pubescent 
bands make this species easily recognizable. Breuning (1955) states that the 
head, pronotum, and elytra are densely and very finely punctate but this is 
an illusion produced by the pubescence. Actually, they are coarsely punctate, 
the elytra less so apically. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Twenty-one specimens from South Carolina, Alabama, 
Texas, and New Mexico. 


Mecas confusa Chemsak and Linsley, new species. 
(Figure 8.) 


Mecas inornata (not Say), BLANCHARD, 1887, Ent. Amer., vol. 3, p. 86; Horn, 1888, Trans. 
Amer. Ent. Soc., vol. 15, p. 301; Lenc and HAmirton, 1896, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., 
vol. 23, p. 152; BratcHiEy, 1910, Coleoptera—in Indiana, p. 1090. 


Mate. Form moderate sized, subparallel; color black, body densely clothed 
with thick, grayish, recumbent pubescence which obscures the surface. Head 
with front convex, finely densely punctate, darker suberect hairs short, about 
half as long as second antennal segment; interantennal area very shallowly con- 
cave; vertex sparsely punctate, large punctures well separated; antennae about 
as long as body, scape finely gray pubescent, remaining segments to ninth 
gray pubescent beneath, third segment longer than scape, fourth shorter than 
third, fifth shorter than first, remaining segments gradually decreasing in 
length. Pronotum broader than long, sides rounded, base impressed; disk 
convex, calluses absent; large deep punctures irregular, well separated, each 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


164 


Se 
Sa PS Se 


== = SS 
a ee a ee 


é. 


sley, 


Mecas confusa Chemsak and Lin 


FIGURE 8. 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 165 


puncture bearing a long erect hair; pro-, meso- and metasterna densely clothed 
with recumbent pubescence which obscures the surface. Elytra less than 2% 
times as long as broad; punctures coarse, close, linearly arranged, becoming 
obsolete at apex; recumbent pubescence completely obscuring surface, base with 
numerous rather short suberect hairs, these becoming shorter and recurved 
toward apex; apices obliquely subtruncate. Legs very densely pubescent; tarsal 
claws with inner tooth almost as long as outer. Abdomen very densely pubes- 
cent; last sternite impressed for its entire length. Length, 10-13 mm. 

FEMALE. Similar in form and size. Abdomen with last sternite linearly 
impressed, apex broadly V-shaped. Length, 10-14 mm. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Holotype male (California Academy of Sciences) 
from Luling, Gonzales Co., Texas, V-3-53 (B. J. Adelson). Allotype from 
Gonzales, Gonzales Co., Texas, V-2-53 (M. Wasbauer). Paratypes as follows: 
2 64, same data as holotype; 1 2,1 2, same data as allotype; 1 2, Ft. Sam 
Houston, Texas (C. Grant); 1 ?, Corpus Christi, Texas, VI-28-42 (E. S. Ross) ; 
2 64,1 2, Palmetto State Park, Gonzales Co., Texas, IV-11-53 (M. Wasbauer), 
V-10-53 (B. J. Adelson); 1 6, Lee Co., Texas, May (R. Oertel); 1 2, Hidalgo 
Co., Texas, VI-22-33 (S. Bromley). Other material, not paratypical includes: 
1 2, Texas (F. Blanchard collection); 1 2°, Lee Co., Texas, June; 1 2, 49 mi. 
N. of Raymondville, Kenedy Co., Texas, VI-30-61 (R. L. Westcott); 1 4,5 22, 
Lake Texoma, 2 mi. E. of Willis, Oklahoma, June, July, 1965 (R. M. Bohart) ; 
Que elark Co,, Kansas, June (¥. H. Snow). 

This species closely resembles M. cineracea but may be separated by its 
larger size, denser overall pubescence, shorter erect hairs on the front of the head, 
and by the structure of the tarsal claws. In M. confusa the inner tooth of the 
claws is elongate and almost as long as the outer one; in M. cineracea the tooth 
is very small. The two species are sympatric, at least in parts of Texas, but it 
is not now known whether they infest the same or different host plants. 


Mecas femoralis (Haldeman). 


Phytoecia femoralis HALDEMAN, 1847, Trans. American Philos. Soc., vol. (2)10, p. 59. 

Mecas femoralis, LeContE, 1852, Jour. Acad. Philadelphia vol. (2)2, p. 155; Horn, 1878, 
Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 7, p. 44; Lenc and Hamirton, 1896, Trans. American 
Ent. Soc., vol. 23, pp. 152, 153; Casey, 1913, Memoirs on the Coleoptera, vol. 4, p. 360 
(in.) ; BreuNtING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, p. 143. 


Mate. Size small, subparallel; color black, femora reddish; pubescence 
grayish. Head with front convex, densely punctate, densely clothed with ap- 
pressed pubescence and numerous suberect, dark hairs; vertex rather coarsely, 
closely punctate, densely pubescent; antennae about as long as body, basal seg- 
ments sparsely gray pubescent beneath, long, erect hairs sparse, third segment 
longer than first, fourth shorter than third, fifth shorter than fourth. Pronotum 
about as long as broad; sides almost subparallel; disk convex, rather coarsely, 


166 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


closely punctate; pubescence dense, short, appressed, long, erect hairs numerous; 
prosternum densely pubescent; meso- and metasternum densely clothed with re- 
cumbent pubescence, sides more coarsely punctate. Elytra about 2’ times as long 
as broad; punctures coarse, dense, becoming finer toward apex; pubescence 
dense, appressed, with longer erect hairs numerously interspersed; apices rounded. 
Legs moderately densely pubescent; tarsal claws with inner tooth very short. 
Abdomen densely pubescent; last sternite shallowly impressed over most of 
its length. Length, 6-8 mm. 

FEMALE. Very similar in size and shape. Abdomen with last sternite im- 
pressed over apical one-half. Length, 6-8 mm. 

TYPE LOCALITY. Not given. 

RANGE. Southeastern United States. 

FLIGHT PERIOD. May to July. 

Host PLANTS. Unknown. 

Remarks. Mecas femoralis can be recognized by its small size, rather 
uniform pubescence, lack of pronotal calluses, and reddish femora. This species 
appears to be rare in collections. The eleven specimens we have seen vary 
very little. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Eleven individuals from North Carolina to Florida 
have been seen. 


Mecas cineracea Casey. 


Mecas cineracea CAsry, 1913, Memoirs on the Coleoptera, vol. 4, p. 360; Vocr, 1949, Pan- 

Pacific Ent., vol. 25, p. 184. (record) 

Saperda cineracea, BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, p. 139. 
Saperda bicallosa BREUNING (not Martin), 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, 

p. 140. 

Mate. Form rather small, parallel; color black, body densely clothed with 
gray recumbent pubescence. Head with front convex, appressed pubescence 
obscuring punctures, longer erect hairs numerous; interantennal area almost 
plane; vertex moderately coarsely, separately punctate; antennae about as 
long as body, basal segments finely gray pubescent beneath, long erect hairs 
decreasing in number toward apex, third segment longer than first, fourth shorter 
than third, fifth a little shorter than first, remaining segments gradually de- 
creasing in length. Pronotum broader than long, sides almost parallel, shal- 
lowly impressed at base; disk convex, without calluses, punctures coarse, 
separated; appressed pubescence obscuring surface, long erect hairs numerous; 
prosternum densely pubescent; meso- and metasternum densely pubescent, 
coarsely punctured at sides. Elytra about 2% times as long as broad; punctures 
coarse, contiguous, becoming finer toward apex; pubescence obscuring surface, 
long suberect hairs numerous near base; apices obliquely truncate. Legs very 
densely pubescent; tarsal claws with inner tooth small. Abdomen densely 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 167 


pubescent; last sternite shallowly impressed for its entire length. Length, 
6-10 mm. 

FEMALE. Similar in form and size. Antennae shorter than body. Abdomen 
with last sternite linearly impressed. Length, 7-11 mm. 

TYPE LOCALITY. Harris Co., Texas. 

RANGE. Southeastern United States to Arizona and Colorado and _ north- 
eastern Mexico. 

FLIGHT PERIOD. April to August. 

Host pLants. Helenium microcephalum, Baileya multiradiata. 

Remarks. This species may be recognized by its small size, lack of pronotal 
calluses, uniform coloration and pubescence, and by the small inner tooth of 
the tarsal claws. It was incorrectly transferred to Saperda by Breuning (1955). 

A series of specimens from western New Mexico and Arizona have thicker 
pubescence than the Texas examples. However, there appears to be a gradient 
in this character from east to west as is apparent in the material at hand. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. More than 200 specimens from South Carolina 
to Florida, to Arizona and Colorado. 


Mecas cinerea (Newman). 
(Figure 9.) 


Saperda cinerea NEWMAN, 1840, Entomologist vol. 1, p. 13. 

Mecas cinerea, GAHAN, 1888, Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 15, p. 300. 

Mecas senescens BATES, 1881, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 203; CAsEy, 
1913, Memoirs on the Coleoptera, vol. 4, p. 360. 

Mecas rubripes BATES, 1881, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, p. 203; 
BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, pp. 140, 143. New synonymy. 

Mecas rubripes morpha callosoreducta BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, 
vol. 27, pp. 140, 143. New synonymy. 

Mecas inornata GAHAN, 1888 (not Say), Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. vol. 15, p. 300. 


Mate. Form moderate sized, elongate, slender, parallel; color black, femora 
and/or elytra often reddish, pronotum occasionally with a median longitudinal 
reddish band; pubescence gray to yellowish, dense, appressed, long erect hairs 
fairly numerous. Head with front convex, finely separately punctate; inter- 
antennal area slightly concave; vertex deeply, separately punctate; pubes- 
cence dense, obscuring surface, long erect hairs moderately numerous; an- 
tennae slightly longer than body, segments gray pubescent beneath, basal 
segments with a few long erect hairs beneath, third segment longer than first, 
fourth subequal to third, fifth equal to first, remaining segments gradually 
decreasing in length, eleventh subacute at apex. Pronotum slightly broader 
than long, cylindrical; disk with two small glabrous calluses on each side of 
basal median elongate callus; punctures moderately coarse, separated at 
middle and subconfluent at sides; appressed pubescence obscuring surface, 


“(UBUUMIN) Dasau29 SspIaPyY JO 9dUGIINIIO UMOUY “6 AMNSIA 
‘uolsstwed Aq poonpoiday ‘“osvotyD Jo AyisiaAtuy) ay} Aq /¢E6T IYSIUAdOO deur aseg 


NOILD3FO8d V3IE¥-IWNDI S,3NNOB 
YNOLNOD 100d 0001». 
su2LIROM oor 


[Proc. 4TH SrEr. 


EIN oe 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


168 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 169 


denser at middle and forming a vague longitudinal band, long erect hairs fairly 
sparse, shorter erect hairs more numerous; prosternum densely pubescent; 
meso- and metasternum densely pubescent, rather densely punctate at sides. 
Elytra usually about 3 times as long as broad; punctures coarse and contiguous 
basally, becoming finer and sparser toward apex; pubescence short, dense, 
appressed, long erect hairs numerous basally, becoming shorter and suberect 
toward apex; apices rounded. Legs moderately densely pubescent; tarsal claws 
with inner tooth slightly shorter than outer. Abdomen densely pubescent; last 
sternite rather shallowly impressed for its entire length. Length, 8-11 mm. 

FEMALE. Form similar. Antennae about as long as elytra. Pronotum more 
transverse, distinctly broader than long. Abdomen with last sternite linearly 
impressed. Length, 8-13 mm. 

TYPE LOCALITY. Of ‘cinerea,’ Mexico; ‘senescens,’ Puebla; ‘rubripes,’ Mex- 
ico; ‘callosoreducta,’ Mexico. 

RANGE. San Luis Potosi to Morelos and Nayarit (fig. 9). 

FLIGHT PERIOD. June to September. 

REMARKS. The number of calluses on the pronotum, elongate body form, 
and the length of the antennae distinguish this species from the other Mexican 
species of Mecas. The body and antennal length, and different tarsal claws 
separate it from M. pergrata. It is difficult to detect a definite geographical 
variational trend from the material available for study. The more northern 
individuals are all black while most of the southern specimens possess reddish 
femora and often, reddish elytra. Two individuals from Nayarit have a reddish 
longitudinal band on the pronotum and yellowish epipleurae. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. MEXICO. San Luis Potosi: 2 646, 17 miles W. of 
Xilitla, 4700 ft., VII-22-54 (Univ. Kansas Mex. Exped.); Hidalgo: 1 4,2 92, 
7 miles NE. of Zimapan, VIII-15-58 (H. F. Howden); Distrito Federal: 5 64, 
7 22, Temascaltepec, 1931 (G. B. Hinton); 1 ¢, 2 22, Real de Arriba, 
Temascaltepec, VII-32 (H. E. Hinton), VII-33 (Hinton and Usinger); 2 4, 
5 22, Tejupilco, Temascaltepec, VI-VII-33 (Hinton and Usinger); Puebla: 
1 2,15 miles S. of Puebla, 6200 ft., IX-6-57 (H. A. Scullen); 1 4, Atlixco, 
VII-23-56 (R. & K. Dreisbach); Mexico: 14,12, 3 miles N. of Valle de Bravo, 
VI-28-29-65 (G. H. Nelson); Morelos: 7 é 6, Cuernavaca VII-6-38, VII-29-61, 
7000 ft. (R. & K. Dreisbach); 1 ¢, 12, Cuernavaca-Acapulco Road, VIII-22-36 
(Ball & Stone); 1 ¢, 4 miles E. of Cuernavaca, 6000 ft., VI-25-59 (H. E. 
Evans); 1 6, 7 km. E. of Cuernavaca, 5700 ft., VIII-11-62 (Evans); Nayarit: 
1 6,1 2, La Mesa de Nayarit, VII-21-55 (B. Malkin). 


Mecas pergrata (Say). 


Saperda pergrata SAy, 1824, Jour. Acad. Philadelphia, vol. 3, p. 407; HaLpEMAN, 1847, 
Trans. American Philos. Soc., vol. (2)10, p. 55; LEConTE, 1859, Complete Writings of 
Thomas Say, vol. 2, p. 190. 


170 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Stenostola pergrata, HALDEMAN, 1847, Proc. American Philos. Soc., vol. 4, p. 373; LEConreE, 
1852, Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. (2)2, p. 154. 

Mecas pergrata, Horn, 1878, Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 7, p. 44; Lenc and Hamiton, 
1896, Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 23, pp. 152, 153; BLarcHLry, 1910, Coleoptera—in 
Indiana, pp. 1090, 1091; CAsry, 1913, Memoirs on the Coleoptera, vol. 4, p. 361; 
CRAIGHEAD, 1923, Dom. Canada Agr. Bull., vol. 27, p. 138; Knut, 1946, Ohio Bio. 
Survey, Bull. vol. 39, pp. 274, 275, pl. 22, fig. 86; BrEUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. 
Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, pp. 140, 144, fig. 1. 

Mecas pergrata morpha semiruficollis BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, 
pp. 140, 145. New synonymy. 

Stenostola gentilis LECONTE, 1852, Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. (2)2, p. 154. 

Mecas discovittata BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, pp. 140, 143. 
New synonymy. 


MALE. Form moderate sized, parallel; color black, femora pale reddish, 
elytra occasionally partly reddish; pubescence dense, short, recumbent, grayish. 
Head with front convex, punctures rather fine, well separated; pubescence dense, 
appressed, long dark erect hairs numerously interspersed; appressed pubescence 
thicker around eyes; vertex rather densely punctate; antennae shorter than body, 
segments gray pubescent beneath, outer segments annulate, third segment longer 
than first, fourth subequal to first, remaining segments gradually decreasing 
in length. Pronotum broader than long, sides slightly rounded; disk convex, 
four glabrous calluses present in addition to median callus; punctures rather 
sparse, scattered; apex and base usually with a narrow band of dense yellowish 
pubescence, remaining surface partially obscured, long, erect hairs numerously 
interspersed; prosternum densely pubescent; meso- and metasternum densely 
pubescent, densely punctate at sides. Scutellum densely clothed with yellowish 
recumbent pubescence. Elytra about 2’ times as long as broad; punctures rather 
coarse, contiguous at base, becoming finer toward apex; pubescence short, re- 
cumbent, partially obscuring surface, longer suberect hairs numerous, suture and 
lateral margins narrowly clothed with dense, yellowish, appressed pubescence; 
apices rounded. Legs finely, densely pubescent; femora reddish; tarsal claws 
with inner tooth small. Abdomen densely pubescent; last sternite shallowly im- 
pressed over most of its length. Length, 6-11 mm. 

FEMALE. Similar in form and size. Antennae extending to about second 
abdominal segment. Abdomen with last sternite linearly impressed. Length, 
6-12 mm. 

TypeE LocaLity. Of ‘pergrata,’ Platte River, Nebraska; ‘gentilis,’ Missouri 
Territory; ‘semiruficollis, Texas; ‘discovittata,’ Colorado. 

RANGE. Great Plains to southeastern United States, New Mexico, and north- 
eastern Mexico. 

FLiGHT PERIOD. April to July. 

Host pLAnts. Aster (roots), Helianthus. 

Remarks. The five glabrous spots of the pronotum, reddish femora, and the 


Vor. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 171 


densely pubescent lines on the suture and lateral margins of the elytra will 
readily distinguish this species. In certain parts of the range, the elytra tend 
to be reddish down the disk and frequently the pronotum is also partially 
reddish. 

Hasits. According to Craighead (1923) larvae feed in the stems of Aster 
and down into the roots, completely hollowing the latter. Subsequently that 
portion of the stem of the plant breaks off at the surface of the ground. Small 
heaps of frass are exuded about the base of the plant. Only one larva is found 
in each stem. 


Mecas cirrosa Chemsak and Linsley, new species. 


Mate. Form moderate sized, robust; color black; pubescence dense, gray, 
recumbent. Head with front convex, rather finely, irregularly punctate; inter- 
antennal area rather deeply impressed; vertex coarsely, separately punctate; 
pubescence dense, appressed, long erect hairs numerous, pale and dark colored; 
antennae slightly shorter than body, segments robust, somewhat flattened, all 
segments gray pubescent beneath, dark brown above, segments from second 
densely fringed with long curved hairs beneath, third segment slightly longer 
than first, fourth a little shorter than third, fifth shorter than first, remaining 
segments gradually decreasing in length. Pronotum broader than long, sides 
broadly rounded; disk convex, each side with a small glabrous, premedian callus, 
narrow median callus extending almost length of disk; punctures moderately 
coarse, irregular, subconfluent; pubescence fine, appressed, long, pale, erect hairs 
numerous; prosternum densely pubescent; meso- and metasternum densely 
pubescent, minutely punctate. Elytra more than 2% times as long as broad; 
basal punctures moderately coarse, well separated, punctures becoming fine 
and quite sparse toward apex; pubescence fine, dense, appressed, basal margin 
with a few long, erect, pale hairs, remainder of surface with very short, suberect, 
dark hairs; apices rounded. Legs densely pubescent; tarsal claws with inner 
tooth short, obtuse, lobe-like. Abdomen densely pubescent; last sternite deeply 
impressed. Length, 13 mm. 

FEMALE. Form similar. Antennae shorter than body, curved hairs less 
numerous beneath. Abdomen with last sternite linearly impressed. Length, 
10.5 mm. . 

TYPE MATERIAL. Holotype male (California Academy of Sciences) from 
5 miles N. of Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico, VII-25-54 (E. I. Schlinger). The 
specimen that we consider as the female of this species differs in several respects. 
The pubescence appears thicker and the antennae have a much sparser fringe. 
This individual is from Km. 320, near Hacienda Balvanera, Queretero, Mexico, 
VIT-13-55. 

Remarks. Although the tarsal claws are uniquely different from other 


172 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


species of Mecas, we consider them to be bifid and the other morphological char- 
acteristics are similar enough to place ‘cirrosa’ in the genus. 


Mecas humeralis Chemsak and Linsley, new species. 


Mate. Form moderate sized, parallel; color black; pubescence dense, 
grayish and brownish. Head with front convex, rather finely, separately 
punctate; interantennal area impressed; vertex rather finely, separately punc- 
tate; pubescence dense, appressed, long, dark, erect hairs numerous; antennae 
about as long as body, outer segments slightly flattened, all segments gray 
pubescent beneath, dark brown above, long erect hairs sparse on basal segments, 
third segment much longer than first, fourth a little shorter than third, fifth 
equal to first, remaining segments gradually decreasing in length. Pronotum 
slightly broader than long, sides broadly rounded; disk convex, each side with 
a large glabrous callus before middle, median callus long, rather broad; punctures 
moderately coarse, subconfluent; pubescence dense, appressed, long erect hairs 
numerous; prosternum densely pubescent; meso- and metasternum densely 
pubescent, finely densely punctate at sides. Elytra about 3 times as long as 
broad; basal punctures coarse, contiguous, becoming finer and sparser toward 
apex; pubescence dense, recumbent, gray on disk, humeri glabrous, epipleurae 
and sides with a broad band of brown pubescence extending from under humeri 
almost to apex, long erect hairs abundant at base, becoming shorter and recurved 
toward apex; apices rounded. Legs densely pubescent; tarsal claws with inner 
tooth short, blunt, lobe-like. Abdomen densely pubescent, first three sternites 
with a narrow glabrous band at base; last sternite deeply impressed. Length, 
13 mm. 

FEMALE. Form similar. Antennae about as long as body. Legs with tarsal 
claws having the short inner tooth slightly acute. Abdomen lacking glabrous 
lines on sternites, last sternite linearly impressed. Length, 10.5 mm. 

TYPE MATERIAL. Holotype male (California Academy of Sciences) from 
El Molino, Jalisco, Mexico, VII-10-56 (R. & K. Dreisbach); allotype from 
Guadalajara, Jalisco, VII-24-51 (P. D. Hurd). 

REMARKS. This species has tarsal claws similar to those of M. cirrosa. The 
different antennae and antennal pubescence will readily separate the two species. 
The glabrous humeri also make M. humeralis distinctive. 


Mecas bicallosa Martin. 


Mecas bicallosa Martin, 1924, Ent. News, vol. 35, p. 244; Hatcu, 1971, Univ. Washington 
Publs. Biol., vol. 16, p. 155. 
Saperda bicallosa, BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, pp. 139, 140. 


Mate. Form moderate sized, parallel, rather robust; color black, body 
densely clothed with short, appressed, grayish pubescence. Head with front 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 173 


convex, pubescence obscuring surface, long erect hairs very numerous; inter- 
antennal area plane, vertex deeply punctate; antennae extending to about third 
abdominal segment, segments through fourth gray pubescent, dark at apices, 
basal segments with numerous long, suberect hairs, segments from third with 
long hairs beneath, these decreasing in number toward apex, third segment 
longer than first, fourth subequal to first, remaining segments short, subequal 
in length. Pronotum broader than long, sides rounded; disk convex, with two 
glabrous calluses at middle and a smaller median one behind middle; punctures 
rather fine, deep, separated; pubescence obscuring surface, very long erect hairs 
numerous; prosternum densely pubescent, front coxal cavities narrowly open 
behind; meso- and metasternum densely clothed with recumbent and_sub- 
depressed pubescence. Elytra more than twice as long as broad; punctures at 
base coarse, dense, becoming finer toward apex; pubescence obscuring surface, 
long, suberect hairs abundant over basal half; apices rounded, often vaguely, 
obtusely toothed. Legs very densely pubescent; tarsal claws with inner tooth 
very small, short. Abdomen densely pubescent; last sternite shallowly, rather 
broadly impressed. Length, 10-13 mm. 

Femate. Form similar. Antennae slightly shorter. Abdomen with last 
sternite narrowly linearly impressed, apex shallowly concave. Length, 10- 
>) ma. 

Type LocaLity. Martins Springs, Lassen Co., California. 

RANGE. Washington to northern Baja California, to Colorado. 

FLIGHT PERIOD. April to August. 

Host PLaAnts. Artemisia tridentata. 

Remarks. The bicallused pronotum and abbreviated distal antennal seg- 
ments characterize this species. Breuning (1955) incorrectly synonymized 
M. bicallosa with M. cineracea Casey and transferred both to Saperda. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. A total of 127 specimens were examined from 
Washington, Oregon, California, Nevada, Idaho, Utah, Colorado and Baja 
California. 


Mecas ambigena Bates. 


Mecas ambigenus BATES, 1881-1885, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, vol. 5, pp. 203, 

426; BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, pp. 142, 147. 

Mecas pseudambigena BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, pp. 142, 

147. New synonymy. 

Mate. Form rather small, short, parallel; color black; pubescence dense, 
rather coarse, brownish, appressed, long dark erect hairs numerous. Head with 
front convex, finely densely punctate; interantennal area concave; vertex 
distinctly, separately punctate; pubescence short, appressed, front with numerous 
very long erect black hairs; antennae extending to about apical of elytra, 


174 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


segments to tenth gray pubescent beneath, segments from fourth narrowly 
annulate at base, basal segments with a moderate number of suberect hairs 
beneath, scape robust, a little shorter than third segment, fourth subequal to 
first, remaining segments decreasing in length. Pronotum broader than long, 
sides broadly rounded; disk convex with a glabrous callus on each side before 
middle, elongate median basal callus often vague or absent; punctures coarse, 
confluent; pubescence short, appressed with numerous long erect hairs inter- 
spersed; prosternum densely pubescent; meso- and metasternum densely pubes- 
cent, finely densely punctate. Elytra less than 2% times as long as broad; 
punctures coarse, contiguous, becoming finer toward apex; pubescence mod- 
erately densely appressed, suture narrowly lined with dense yellow-brown 
pubescence, long erect hairs numerous over basal ’2, shorter and suberect toward 
apex; apices rounded. Legs densely pubescent; tarsal claws with inner tooth 
smaller than outer. Abdomen densely pubescent, finely punctate; last sternite 
deeply impressed for about ™ its length. Length, 9 mm. 

FEMALE. Similar in form and size. Antennae extending to about apical % 
of elytra. Abdomen with last sternite lightly linearly impressed. Length, 10 mm. 

Type LocaLity. Of ‘ambigena,’ Mexico; ‘pseudambigena,’ Mexico. 

RANGE. Durango to Mexico. 

FLIGHT PERIOD. June and July. 

Remarks. The shorter form and short antennae will distinguish M. ambigena 
from other species of Mecas. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. MEXICO. Durango: 1 ¢, 25 miles W. of Durango, 
7,500 ft., VI-23-64 (J. E. Martin); Zacatecas: 2 64, 4 miles W. of Monte 
Escobido, 7,800 ft., VII-19-20-54 (R. H. Brewer); Mexico: 1 ¢&, Toluca 
(Wickham). 


Mecas menthae Chemsak and Linsley, new species. 

(Figures 10, 11.) 

Mecas marginella, LINSLEY, KNULL, and STATHAM (not LeConte), 1961, Amer. Mus. Nov., 
nNOwZ20505 pas2- 

Mate. Form moderate sized, subparallel; color black; pubescence dense, 
short, appressed, grayish to gray-brown, long erect dark hairs numerous. Head 
with front convex, rather finely, separately punctate; vertex deeply, separately 
punctate; pubescence dense, short, appressed, antennal tubercles dark pubescent 
above, long erect hairs numerous on front and vertex; antennae slightly longer 
than elytra, segments to tenth gray pubescent beneath, segments from fifth 
narrowly pale annulate at base, long erect hairs fairly numerous beneath on 
basal segments, third segment longer than first, fourth shorter than third but 
longer than first, fifth equal to first, remaining segments gradually decreasing 
in length. Pronotum broader than long, sides broadly rounded; disk convex, 
each side of middle with a rather large, glabrous callus, middle with an elongate 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 175 


= 
SRN 


RSs 


“ if} f 
We 


i 
Ss 


SoS 


= 


~~ 


sas 
SAS So 


Ficure 10. Mecas menthae Chemsak and Linsley, 92. 


[Proc. 4TH Serr. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


176 


‘AQ[SUIT pue YyesuloyD avyjuawm spray JO 9dUAIINIDIO UMOUY 


‘TI Fano 


‘uotsstuiad Aq paonpoiday ‘oseotyD JO AjysIoAtUA, 9Yy} Aq LEG] J4stIAdoo dew aseg 


= 


3ONsIDNO7 153m 


sol 


s! We 
a 


oa 


——= 


NOILD3°O¥8d VY3YNV-1VND3 S/3NNOE 
YNOLNOD 1004 O00) 


Su2L3MOTIM OOF ooc oor 001 


Re 


s711n09¢ ooe 001 
aqvos 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 177 


callus toward base; punctures rather fine, separated; pubescence short, appressed, 
obscuring surface, long erect hairs numerous; prosternum densely pubescent; 
meso- and metasternum densely pubescent, finely densely punctate at sides. 
Scutellum densely clothed with appressed pubescence. Elytra more than 
2% times as long as broad; punctures coarse, contiguous to about apical %, 
very fine at apex; pubescence dense, short appressed, lateral margins and 
suture with a narrow band of appressed pubescence, long erect hairs numerous 
basally, shorter toward apex; apices rounded. Legs densely pubescent; tarsal 
claws with inner tooth slightly shorter than outer. Abdomen densely pubescent; 
last sternite deeply impressed for about * of its length. Length, 8-12 mm. 

FEMALE. Similar in form, slightly more robust. Antennae about as long as 
elytra. Abdomen with last sternite linearly impressed. Length, 9-13 mm. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Holotype male, allotype (California Academy of 
Sciences) and 99 paratypes (60 males, 39 females) from 8 miles W. of El 
Palmito, Sinaloa, Mexico, VII-19, 24, 29-64, VIII-5-64 on Agastache (J. A. 
Chemsak, J. A. Powell, H. F. Howden). Additional material not paratypical 
assignable to this species includes: 9 6 6,5 2 2, 6.5 miles E. of Potrerillos, Hwy. 
30, Sinaloa, VIII-20-21-64 (E. 1. Schlinger, P. Rauch); 2 ¢ 4, 20 miles E. of Villa 
Union, Sinaloa, VIII-20-64 (P. Rauch); 1 2, 63 miles E. of Jct. Hwy. 15 & 
40 on Hwy. 40, Mexico, VIII-28-64 (D. C. & K. A. Rentz, J. A. Grant); 1 ¢, 
El Pichon, Nayarit, Mexico, VI-25-63 (J. Doyen); 1 4, Southwestern Research 
Station, Chiricahua Mts., Arizona, VIII-24-58 (P. D. Hurd); 1 6,1 2°, Yank’s 
Spring, Sycamore Canyon, Tumacacori Mts., Santa Cruz Co., Arizona, VII-28- 
65 (H. B. Leech); 1 ¢, Oak Creek Canyon, 12 miles S. of Sedona, Arizona, 
VII-18-57 (C. W. O’Brien); 1 2, Swift Trail, between Ladybug Saddle and 
Shannon Park, Pinaleno Mountains, Graham County, Arizona, VI-27-58 (J. M. 
& S. N. Burns). Other specimens from Mexico tentatively assigned to M. 
menthae; 1 2, 2 miles S. of Tlaquepaque, Jalisco, VII-11-53 (C. & P. Vaurie) ; 
1 2,5 km. W. of Zacapu, Michoacan, VII-13-51 (H. E. Evans); 1 2, Real de 
Arriba, Distrito Federal, VII-32 (H. E. Hinton); 1 6, 2 2%, Temescaltepec, 
Distrito Federal, 1931 (G. B. Hinton); 1 2, Tejupilco, Temescaltepec, VI-33 
(H. E. Hinton, R. L. Usinger). 

This species differs from M. ambigena by the much longer antennae, finer 
pubescence, and much less coarsely punctate pronotum. 

The type series was collected during the day from the apical leaves of the 
mint Agastache. The adults were found resting in the curve of the smaller top 
leaves of the plant. Numerous individuals were mating and this plant is prob- 
ably the larval host. 


Mecas cana (Newman). 


Saperda cana NewMan, 1840, Entomologist, vol. 1, p. 12; LeConrer, 1852, Jour. Acad. 
Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. (2)2, p. 164. 


178 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Mecas cana, GAHAN, 1888, Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 15, p. 300; Lenc and Hamirton, 
1896, Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 23, p. 152; Casey, 1913, Memoirs on the Coleoptera, 
vol. 4, p. 360; BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, p. 148. 


MALE. Form moderate sized, subparallel; color black, body densely clothed 
with gray recumbent pubescence. Head with front convex, pubescence obscuring 
punctures, longer, dark, suberect hairs numerous; interantennal area almost 
plane; vertex finely, separately punctate; antennae slightly shorter than body, 
segments to sixth rather sparsely grey pubescent beneath, long erect hairs de- 
creasing in number toward apex; third segment longer than scape, fourth 
shorter than third but longer than first, remaining segments gradually decreasing 
in length. Pronotum broader than long, sides rounded to subparallel; basal 
and apical margins narrowly margined; disk convex, each side with a flat 
glabrous callus before middle, middle usually with a vague linear callus near 
base; punctures moderately coarse, rather sparse, partially obscured by pubes- 
cence; longer erect hairs pale with dark setae interspersed mostly at sides; 
prosternum densely pubescent; meso- and metasternum densely pubescent; 
metasternum deeply rather densely punctate at sides. Elytra over 2% times 
longer than broad; punctures moderately coarse, well separated, becoming 
finer and sparser toward apex; pubescence obscuring surface, longer suberect 
hairs numerous; apices obliquely subtruncate. Legs densely pubescent; tarsal 
claws with inner tooth small. Abdomen occasionally reddish, densely pubescent; 
last sternite moderately impressed for its entire length. Length, 9-15 mm. 

FEMALE. Form similar. Antennae shorter than body. Abdomen with last 
sternite linearly impressed. Length, 10-16 mm. 

TYPE Locatity. St. John’s Bluff, Florida. 

RANGE. Southeastern United States to Texas, northeastern Mexico, and 
South Dakota. 

REMARKS. This species may be separated from M. confusa by the short 
inner tooth of the tarsal claws. The pronotal calluses readily distinguish it from 
M. cineracea and the elongate antennal segments from M. bicallosa. 

Two subspecies can be recognized. 


Mecas cana cana (Newman). 


Saperda cana NEWMAN, 1840, Entomologist, vol 1, p. 12; LeConre, 1852, Jour. Acad. Nat. 
Sci. Philadelphia, vol. (2)2, p. 164. 

Mecas cana, GAHAN, 1888, Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 15, p. 300; Casry, 1913, Memoirs 
on the Coleoptera, vol. 4, p. 360; BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Nat. Belgique, vol. 27, 
p. 148. 


Body densely grayish pubescent, elytra narrowly clothed at suture and 
lateral margins with bands of appressed pubescence. Length, 10—-12.5 mm. 

TypE LocALity. St. John’s Bluff, Florida. 

RANGE. Florida. 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 179 


FLIGHT PERIOD. April to October. 

Host pLrants. Ambrosia, Flaveria linearis. 

REMARKS. This subspecies appears to be restricted to Florida, primarily 
the southern portion. Although Breuning (1955) states that the type of M. c. 
cana appears to be lost, it is in the collection of the British Museum (Natural 
History). 


Mecas cana saturnina (LeConte). 


Stenostola saturnina LECONTE, 1859, Smithsonian Contr. Knowledge, vol. 11, p. 21. 

Mecas saturnina, GAHAN, 1888, Trans. American Ent. Soc. vol. 15, p. 300; Horn, 1888, 
Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 15, p. 301; Brreuntnc, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. 
Belgique, vol. 27, p. 146; Wirson, 1960, Comm. Inst. Biol. Control Tech. Comm. vol. 1, 
p. 62; StrmpE and WARWICK, 1962, Anim. Behaviour, vol. 10, p. 112 (habits). 

Mecas inornata (not Say), Horn, 1878, Trans. American Ent. Soc., vol. 7, p. 44; KNULL, 
1946, Ohio Biol. Surv. Bull. vol. 39, p. 274; Dmton and Ditton, 1961, Man. Common 
Beetles of Eastern North America, p. 652, pl. 65, no. 17. 

Mecas brevicollis CAsEY, 1913, Memoirs on the Coleoptera, vol. 4, p. 362. 


Similar in form and size to typical subspecies. Pubescence uniformly gray 
or yellowish, elytra without pubescent bands on margins and suture. Length, 
9-16 mm. 

TYPE LocaALity. Of ‘saturnina, Kansas; ‘brevicollis, WKansas. 

RANGE. Alabama to northeastern Mexico to South Dakota. 

FLIGHT PERIOD. May to August. 

Host pLants. Ambrosia, Xanthium, Helianthus, Gaillarda. Adults have 
also been taken on Prosopis and Salvia in Texas. 


INCERTAE SEDIS 


Mecas albovitticollis Breuning. 


Mecas albovitticollis BrEuNtNG, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Ent. Belgique, vol. 27, p. 146. 
Mecas (?)———————————(?) Bates, 1885, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera, 
vol. 5, p. 427. 


“Antennae a little longer than the body. Lower lobes of the eyes obviously longer 
than the cheeks. Head and pronotum densely and very finely punctate. Pronotum 
transverse. Elytra slightly truncate at the apices, densely and finely punctate. 

“Black covered with light gray pubescence. Pronotum ornated with three straight, 
longitudinal, discal, whitish bands. Scutellum having whitish pubescence. Antennae 
faced with deep brown pubescence. 

“Length: 10 mm; width: 2% mm. 

“Type: a male from Mexico in the British Museum.” 


We have been unable to place this species on the basis of the above original 
description and were unable to locate the type at the British Museum. However, 
we believe that this species was based on the single specimen cited by Bates in 
the Biologia Centrali-Americana. Since this reference stated: “One example 


180 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


of a distinct species, in bad condition, doubtfully belonging to this genus.’’, we 
will follow Bates and exclude it from the genus Mecas. 


Mecas marmorata Gahan. 


Mecas marmorata GAHAN, 1892, Trans. Ent. Soc. London. 1892, p. 268, pl. 12, fig. 7; 
BREUNING, 1955, Mem. Soc. Roy. Belgique, vol. 27, pp. 140, 152. 


Mate. Form elongate, slender; color black, pronotum and elytra suffused 
with pale reddish brown, antennal segments 2 to 10 reddish; pubescence dense, 
yellowish, appressed, arranged in patches on elytra, forming a longitudinal 
band down middle of pronotum. Pronotum cylindrical, as long as broad; 
mesosternal process slightly broadened. Elytra more than 3 times longer than 
broad; punctures coarse, irregular; apices produced, dentate. Legs short; 
mesotibiae with sinus; tarsal claws with inner tooth smaller than outer. Abdomen 
with last sternite deeply impressed. 

TYPE LOCALITY. Guerrero, Mexico (not restricted further). 

The elongate body, apically produced elytra, and cylindrical pronotum 
appear sufficient to exclude this species from Mecas. Since we have examined 
only the type in the British Museum (Natural History) and one other male 
from 17 miles south of Puebla, Puebla, IX-6-57 (H. A. Scullen) we have not 
attempted to clarify the generic status of ‘marmorata’ at this time. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


This study was made as part of a National Science Foundation sponsored 
monograph of North American Cerambycidae (Grant GB-31120-X). Although 
a large portion of the material we examined came from the California Academy 
of Sciences and the California Insect Survey, Berkeley, we wish to gratefully 
acknowledge the following institutions for the loan of specimens: American 
Museum of Natural History; Canadian National Collection, Ottawa; Cornell 
University; Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago; Los Angeles County 
Museum; Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University; Instituto 
Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico; 
Ohio State University; Oregon State University; United States National 
Museum; University of California, Davis and Riverside, University of Kansas; 
collections of G. H. Nelson and R. L. Westcott. 

We are deeply appreciative to Celeste Green for preparing the illustrations 
and to the authorities of the British Museum (Natural History) for permitting us 
to examine type specimens in their collection. 


LITERATURE CITED 


BaArerc, W. J. 
1921. A girdler on artichokes and other little-known insect pests. Journal of Economic 
Entomology, vol. 14, pp. 99-100. 


VoL. XX XIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 181 


Bates, H. W. 
1881-1885. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insecta, Coleoptera, Lamiidae, vol. 5, pp. 153- 
224, pls. xii-xv, pp. 334-436, pls. xxii-xxv. [Mecas, pp. 203-205.] 
BEUTENMULLER, W. 
1896. Food-habits of North American Cerambycidae. Journal of the New York Ento- 
mological Society, vol. 4, pp. 73-81. 
Brake, S. F. 
1951. Compositae. Jn: Kearney, T. H. and R. H. Peebles, Arizona Flora, pp. 829-971. 
University of California Press. 
BLANCHARD, F. 
1887. Notes on Coleoptera. Entomologia Americana, vol. 3, pp. 85-88. 
BLATCHLEY, W. W. 
1910. On the Coleoptera known to occur in Indiana. Indiana Department of Geology 
and Natural Resources, Bulletin 1, 1386 pp. 
BREUNING, S. 
1952. Revision einiger Gattungen aus der Gruppe der Saperdini Muls. Entomologische 
Arbeiten aus der Museum G. Frey, vol. 3, pp. 107-213. 
1955. Revision du genre Mecas LeConte. Memoires de la Société Royale d’Entomologie 
de Belgique, vol. 27, pp. 138-152, 1 fig. 
1967. Mecas. Catalogue des Lamiaires du Monde, vol. 10, pp. 830-832. 
CasEy, T. L. 
1913. Mecas LeC. Memoirs on the Coleoptera, vol. 4, pp. 360-363. 
CuHEmMsAK, J. A., AND E. G. LINSLEY 
1965. A revised key to the species of Elytroleptus with notes on variation and distri- 
bution. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, vol. 41, pp. 193-199. 
CRAIGHEAD, F. C. 
1923. North American cerambycid larvae. Dominion of Canada, Department of 
Agriculture Bulletin No. 27, new series, 238 pp., 44 pls. 
Diton, E. S. anp L. S. Ditton 
1961. A manual of the common beetles of Eastern North America. Row, Peterson 
and Company. 884 pp. 
GaHaNn, C. J. 
1888. Notes on some types of North American Cerambycidae in the British Museum. 
Transactions of the American Entomological Society, vol. 15, pp. 299-300. 
1892. Additions to the Longicornia of Mexico and Central America, with notes on 
some previously-recorded species. Transactions of the Entomological Society 
of London. 1892, pp. 255-274. 
Gimour, E. F. 
1962. Synopsis of the tribe Aerenicini. Revista de Biologia Tropical, vol. 10, pp. 123-147. 
HALDEMAN, S. S. 
1847. Material toward a history of the Coleoptera Longicornia of the United States. 
Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, vol. (2)10, pp. 27-66. 
1847. Corrections and additions to his paper on the Longicornia of the United States. 
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 4, pp. 371-376. 
Hatcu, M. H. 
1971. The beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part V. University of Washington Publi- 
cations in Biology, vol. 16, 662 pp. 


182 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Horn, G. H. 
1878. Notes on some genera of Cerambycidae of the United States. Transactions of 
the American Entomological Society, vol. 7, pp. 41—50. 
1888. Additional notes. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, vol. 14, 
pp. 300-301. 
Kincssury, J. M. 
1967. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey. 
xiii + 626 pp., 130 figs. 


Knut, J. N. 
1946. The long-horned beetles of Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin 39, pp. 133- 
354, 29 pls. 
LAcorDAIRrE, J. T. 
1872. Genera des coléoptéres. . ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 411-930. 
LEConrmE, J. L. 


1852. An attempt to classify the longicorn Coleoptera of the part of America north 
of Mexico. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 
(2)2, pp. 139-178. 
1859a. The Coleoptera of Kansas and Eastern New Mexico. Smithsonian Contributions 
to Knowledge, no. 11, pp. 1-58. 
1859b. The complete writings of Thomas Say on the entomology of North America. 2 
vols. New York. 
1873a. New species of North American Coleoptera. Part II. Smithsonian Miscel- 
laneous Collections, No. 264, pp. 169-240. 
1873b. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. Part II. Smithsonian 
Miscellaneous Collections, No. 265, pp. 279-348. 
LEConTE, J. L., anp G. H. Horn 
1883. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. Smithsonian Miscellaneous 
Collections, no. 507, xxxviii +- 567 pp. 
Lenc, C. W. ano J. HAMILTON 
1896. Synopsis of the Cerambycidae of North America. Part III, the Lamiinae. Trans- 
actions of the American Entomological Society, vol. 23, pp. 101-178. 
Linsey, E. G. 
1962. Synopsis of the genus Elytroleptus Dugés. Folia Entomologica Mexicana, no. 3, 
pp. 1-13. 
Linstey, E. G., J. N. Knut, Ano M. STATHAM 
1961. A list of Cerambycidae from the Chiricahua Mountain area, Cochise County, 
Arizona. American Museum Novitates, no. 2050, pp. 1-34, 24 figs. 
Martin, J. O. 
1924. Studies in the genus Mecas. Entomological News, vol. 35, pp. 244-245. 
NEwmMan, E. 
1840. Entomological notes. Entomologist, vol. 1, pp. 1-16. 
Norp, J. C., AND F. B. KnicHT 
1970. Saperda inornata Say, 1824 (Insecta, Coleoptera): Proposed use of the plenary 
powers to designate a neotype to stabilize the nomenclature. Bulletin of Zoo- 
logical Nomenclature, vol. 27, pp. 123-128. 
Rey, C. V. 
1880. Food habits of the longicorn beetles or wood borers. American Entomologist, 
vol. 3, pp. 237-239, 270-271. 


VoL. XXXIX] CHEMSAK AND LINSLEY: MECAS 183 


Save) Tr. 

1824. Descriptions of coleopterous insects collected in the late expedition to the Rocky 
Mountains, performed by order of Mr. Calhoun, Secretary of War, under the 
command of Major Long. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of 
Philadelphia, vol. 3, pp. 139-216. 

STRIDE, G. O., AND E. P. WArRwIckK 

1962. Ovipositional girdling in a North American cerambycid beetle, Mecas saturnina. 

Animal Behaviour, vol. 10, pp. 112-117. 
THomson, J. 

1864. Systema cerambycidarum on expose de tous les genres compris dans la famille 
des Cerambycides et familles limitrophes. Memoires des Société Royale des 
Sciences de Liege, vol. 19, pp. 1-540. 

1868. Physis recueil d’Histoire Naturelle, vol. 2, pp. 6-208. 

TOWNSEND, C. H. T. 
1884. Notes on some Coleoptera taken in South Louisiana. Psyche, vol. 4, pp. 219-222. 
Voct, G. B. 

1949. Notes on Cerambycidae from the lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas. The Pan- 

Pacific Entomologist, vol. 25, pp. 137-144, 175-184. 
Witson, F. 

1960. A review of the biological control of insects and weeds in Australia and Australian 
New Guinea. Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Technical Com- 
munication no. 1, pp. 1-102. 


° Li : wi wall 
i" ae rf a A ai 
\ oy GH) 
WwW shé iy ’ 


Oba 


~* 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE Weoatls Hale, wage, 
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF §S 


FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 13, pp. 185-256; 26 figs.; 7 tables. July 9, 1973 


COMPARATIVE REVISION OF SCOMBEROIDES, 
OLIGOPLITES, PARONA, AND HYPACANTHAUS 
WITH COMMENTS ON THE PHYLOGENETIC 

POSITION OF CAMPOGRAMMA 
(PISCES: CARANGIDAE)' 


= 
William F. Smith-Vaniz? and Jon C. Staiger 


Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami 
10 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida 33149 


TABLE OF CONTENTS 


LVDS CYST ce SS ee RE ner eee WO OE 186 
ee een aE DEY Hoe rants ek ei Oe oe Te Tae ee 186 
Mrrseercrseanur MeCnOUS . te a ee 187 
Semmsmscumucrores Lacepede = 2 toe oe ee eee 190 
Mevarorspecies\GL scomberoides — 193 
Neomberoides commersonianus Lacépede ——-__-___ 194 
ReaMICROIGeS COld ((CUVIEL)" 2225. ee 199 
RUCHOIOeS VSN |(CHOrSKal) Se a ee 205 
tie ROTC SHLOUM\ OC UNIGE)) oe A. 2 ee a ae eee eee 209 
DamuUerOres. SPINOSUS (SMITROV )) 22 ee ee ee eee Dil 
ene AOU pTILes Gili o= Se Sa 2 2 AUS Vie a ee 213 
evarospecies. 0: Oligoplitess =! ee 217 
Oicoplites réjuigens Gilbert: and Starks — 27 
Mapes SGiICNS (EOC) ey F2RN0 i) Fes 3 ee ee 218 


1 Contribution number 1624 from the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University 
of Miami. 

2Present address: The Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, Nineteenth and the Parkway, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. 


[185] 


186 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Olicoplites-saurus (Block and Schneider). Eee 221 
Oligopliesraitus,( Gunther), ..2 4 32% 2". 5 J ee eee 222 
Oligoplites pelometa (Cuvier) .....<-. eee 225 
Genus Parone Bete. 2 tS ee 225 
Porona signata (Jenyns)  ...- Eee 227 
Genus Aypacanthus Ratinesque\._..__.__ Eee 228 
Hy pacanthus ana (Linnaeus) Eee 230 
Relationships and Zoogeography .....___.._.___.._ ____.__ _ = aaa Zou 
Phylogenetic position of Campogramma Regan __.---._--------_--------------- 244 
SUMMMATY = 32s ee ee Se i A Oe ee ee 247 
Nominal species of Scomberoides and Oligoplites ____----_________ 248 
Literature Cited. 2-2 ee eee 250 
INTRODUCTION 


This study evolved as a result of our efforts to unscramble the confused 
synonymies of Indo-Pacific carangids of the genus Scomberoides. The initial 
effort led us to review the species of Oligoplites, a New World genus closely 
related to Scomberoides, last treated by Schultz (1945). It soon became obvious 
that our paper would not be complete unless we included coverage of several 
monotypic Atlantic genera that are superficially similar to the ‘leatherjackets’ 
of American waters. Comparison of these three carangid genera is especially 
desirable because they, together with Oligoplites, are the only ones, of the 18 
Atlantic genera that we currently recognize, which do not occur on both sides of 
the Atlantic. The combinations of characters exhibited by these genera have 
impressed us with the artificiality of the present subfamilial partitioning of the 
Carangidae. In discussing relationships of these genera it is necessary to em- 
phasize some of the inadequacies of the present subfamilial classification of 
the Carangidae. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


We wish to thank the following individuals who assisted us in obtaining data 
for our study, either through hospitality at their institutions or by providing 
data on, or loans of, specimens (abbreviations refer to institutions and are ex- 
plained in the methods section): Donn E. Rosen, AMNH; John R. Paxton, 
AMS; N. B. Marshall and Alwyne C. Wheeler, BMNH; William N. Eschmeyer 
and staff, CAS; M. L. Bauchot, MNHN; Carl L. Hubbs and Richard H. Rosen- 
blatt, SIO; Warren C. Freihofer, SU; Frederick H. Berry, TABL; Boyd W. 
Walker, UCLA; C. Richard Robins, UMML; Victor G. Springer, Martin F. 
Gomon and Edgar E. Gramblin, USNM; Jérgen G. Nielsen, ZMC; R. J. McKay, 
WAM. 


Vor. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 187 


Special thanks are due J. R. Paxton and R. J. McKay for providing identi- 
fications and locality data for collections of Scomberoides housed in their re- 
spective institutions, thus confirming our tentative zoogeographical conclusions. 
Tomio Iwamoto examined MNHWN types of Scomberoides (subsequently re- 
examined by us) that provided much of the impetus for initiation of the present 
paper. 

Additional help came from various sources. James E. Bohlke and William 
N. Eschmeyer facilitated our study by making literature available. Phillip C. 
Heemstra called to our attention several pertinent references. William H. Hulet 
and Francisco J. Palacio assisted in translating Italian and Portuguese literature. 
Grady W. Reinert illustrated the specimens shown in figure 1. The manuscript 
was typed by Mrs. Kathie Jeffries. 

Work space at the Southeast Fisheries Center Miami Laboratory, National 
Marine Fishery Service, where much of the material cited in this paper is 
housed, was generously provided by the Director, Mr. Harvey R. Bullis. 

Frederick H. Berry and C. Richard Robins reviewed the manuscript and 
offered suggestions for improvement. 

Major collections of Scomberoides critical to our study were obtained in 
Ceylon under Smithsonian Foreign Currency Grant 3818, C. Richard Robins 
and Frederick H. Berry, principal investigators. Field work in Ceylon was 
greatly facilitated by the cooperation of Mr. A. S. Mendis, Deputy Director 
(Research), Department of Fisheries, Ceylon. The second author was able to 
pursue this study through support of the National Geographic Society-Univer- 
sity of Miami Deep-Sea Biology Program (University of Miami research account 
8852R), Gilbert L. Voss, Principal Investigator. Partial support was also pro- 
vided by a grant from the Tai Ping Foundation to Smith-Vaniz for study of 
Indian Ocean Carangidae. 


CHARACTERS AND METHODS 


Osteological terminology generally follows that of Suzuki (1962); a specific 
exception is the “postmaxillary process” which is here more appropriately 
termed a premaxillary spur since it is a posterior projection on the premaxilla 
that braces the maxilla. A basibranchial is defined (Nelson, 1969, p. 480) as 
the median part of the gill arch endoskeleton that lies between successively 
paired arch-elements. The number of the basibranchial refers to the paired 
arch-element behind it. 

Rayless predorsal interneurals are termed predorsal bones (Smith and 
Bailey, 1961). All carangids have at least 3 predorsal bones; counting poste- 
tiorly, the fourth element, whether supporting a dorsal-fin spine or not, has a well 
developed spinelike projection on its anterodorsal margin. This structure, 
commonly termed a procumbent spine, may occasionally protrude through the 


188 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


skin. In the genera treated in this study, all anterior dorsal pterygiophores 
support a single fin spine. Thus, a shortening of the dorsal-fin base through 
loss of anterior spines results in a concomitant increase in number of predorsal 
bones. The first fin-ray (spine) is often greatly reduced, depressed posteriorly, 
and can easily be overlooked. In carangids there is a tendency for the number 
of external spines to decrease in large specimens due to absorption, as evidenced 
from examination of radiographs. In this study large specimens were not x- 
rayed or dissected; thus the frequency of specimens with the least number of 
dorsal spines may be slightly lower than indicated in tables 2 and 4. 

The last dorsal- and anal-fin rays are split to the base, have a single pteryg- 
iophore, and were counted as one ray. 

The first caudal vertebra has a well developed haemal spine which artic- 
ulates with the first anal pterygiophore; the urostyle is regarded as the terminal 
caudal vertebra. 

Counts of outer row dentary teeth in Scomberoides and Oligoplites are lateral 
counts (one side only). Counts were made on the dentary that appeared to 
have the most teeth. Broken teeth were counted but empty tooth sockets and 
teeth that had not attained a functional position in the outer row were excluded. 
Symphyseal dentary canines were also excluded in the case of Scomberoides. 

Pectoral-fin ray counts are lateral counts (one side only). The dorsalmost 
fin-ray element is spinelike and was counted separately. 

Gillraker counts are lateral counts and were usually made on the right side 
of each fish. Only gillrakers on the lateral side of the first arch were counted. 
The gillraker at the angle of the upper and lower limb has the major portion 
of its base on the ceratobranchial bone and was included in the count of the 
lower limb. Rudimentary gillrakers (with the width of raker greater than its 
length) were not included in the counts. 

All measurements are straight line (point to point) measurements. Mea- 
surements smaller than 120 mm. were made with dial calipers. Measurements 
given in the material examined sections are fork length (FL), unless otherwise 
stated, and have been rounded off to the nearest millimeter. In large fishes 
with relatively rigid caudal fins, such as carangids, the end of the hypural plate 
is often difficult to determine precisely. In addition to being easier to determine 
than standard length, fork length is more familiar to fishery biologists, who 
should have the greatest need to identify carangids. The following measurements 
were used in this study: 


Fork length (FL). Snout tip to tip of shortest median caudal-fin ray. 

Standard length (SL). Snout tip to posterior end of hypural bones (caudal 
base). 

Head length (HL). Snout tip to posterior margin of fleshy opercular flap. 

Snout-postorbit length. Snout tip to anterior margin of posterior adipose eyelid. 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 189 


Snout length. Snout tip to posterior margin of anterior adipose eyelid. 

Upper jaw length. Snout tip to posterior margin of maxilla. 

Body depth Dz to Ag. Origin of terminal dorsal spine to origin of terminal anal 
spine. 

Height of fin lobes. Origin of fin to tip of longest segmented ray. 

Pectoral-fin length. Origin of spine to tip of longest ray. 


Abbreviations of institutions cited are as follows: 


AMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York City 

AMS Australian Museum, Sydney 

BMNH British Museum (Natural History), London 

CAS California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco 

FMNH Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago 

MNHN Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris 

NFIS Natur-Museum und Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, Frankfurt 

SIO Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla 

SU Stanford University, Division of Systematic Biology (collection trans- 
ferred to CAS) 

TABL _ Southeast Fisheries Research Center, National Marine Fishery Service, 
Miami (formerly Tropical Atlantic Biological Laboratory) 

UCLA University of California at Los Angeles 

UMML University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric 
Science, Miami 

USNM National Museum of Natural History, Division of Fishes, Washington, 
DPC. 

ZMC Zoological Museum, Copenhagen 

WAM Western Australian Museum, Perth. 


Uncataloged California Academy of Sciences specimens collected under the 
auspices of the George Vanderbilt Foundation (GVF) are reported under their 
register or station numbers. Most collections from Ceylon are uncataloged and 
listed by station numbers. Abbreviations refer to the following collectors listed 
in chronological order of their visits to Ceylon: F. J. Schwartz; W. F. Smith- 
Vaniz; P. C. Heemstra; C. C. Koenig. 

Localities in material examined sections are abbreviated. Summary state- 
ments of material examined include only specimens examined by the authors. 


190 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Scomberoides Lacépéde, 1802 


Scomberoides LACEPEDE, 1802, p. 50 (type-species: Scomberoides commersonianus LACEPEDE, 
1802, by subsequent designation of JORDAN, 1917, p. 60). 

Orcynus RAFINESQUE, 1815, p. 84 (nomen nudum; substitute name for Scomberoides LACEPEDE, 
1802). 

Chorinemus Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 367 (type-species: Scomberoides 
commersonianus LACEPEDE, 1802, by subsequent designation of JORDAN, 1917, p. 137). 

Rhaphiolepis FOWLER, 1905, p. 59 (as a subgenus of Scomberoides; type-species: Chorinemus 
tol Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, by original designation). 

Eleria JORDAN and SEALE, 1905, p. 774 (type-species: Eleria philippina JoRDAN and SEALE, 
1905 = Chorinemus tala Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, by monotypy). 

Palaeoscomber SmirRNov, 1936, p. 49-59 (type-species: Palaeoscomber spinosus SMIRNOV, 
1936, by original designation). 


The carangid genus Scomberoides comprises four recent and one fossil species 
of tropical and subtropical marine fishes restricted to the Indian and western 
and central Pacific oceans. All recent species attain at least 45 cm. fork length. 
Scomberoides commersonianus, the largest species, occasionally exceeds 100 cm. 
and is a valued game fish. In some areas S. commersonianus supports a seasonal 
fishery of considerable importance. Major catches are obtained from drift nets 
set at depths of 15 to 18 m. in waters surrounding offshore islands (James, 
1967). Depending on the region, scomberoides are considered excellent food 
fishes (Smith, 1949, p. 224) or they are mostly salted and not generally esteemed 
(Chan, 1968, p. 82). 

Halstead et al. (1972) give a detailed description of the venom apparatus 
of Scomberoides lysan. Venom glands are associated with the first seven dorsal- 
fin spines and the first two anal spines. The anal spines, rather than the dorsal 
spines, are the most venomous. The anal spines are equipped with a frictional 
locking device which resembles that found in the fin spines of catfishes and 
balistid triggerfishes. Scomberoides lysan is capable of inflicting painful stings. 
The nearly identical morphology of these spines in the other species of Scom- 
beroides and Oligoplites (see comments under O. saurus) suggest that all species 
of both genera are venomous. 

The osteology of Scomberoides has received inadequate attention. The only 
species studied in detail (under the name Chorinemus orientalis) is Scomberoides 
lysan (Suzuki, 1962). The only known fossil species of Scomberoides was orig- 
inally described as belonging to a new genus, Palaeoscomber, of Scombridae 
(Smirnov, 1936) and was subsequently redescribed as a species of Oligoplites 
(Danil’chenko, 1960). 

The nomenclature of Scomberoides species has been greatly confused by 
a plethora of nominal species inadequately described by early workers. Differ- 
ences ascribed to nominal species have frequently been based on unrecognized 
ontogenetic changes. Changes in dentition associated with growth led Jordan 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 191 


TasleE 1. Nominal species of Scomberoides recognized in selected publications with our 
present allocation. 


Authors Species 
Present Study commersonianus tala lysan tol 
Smith (1970) lysan — tolooparah tala 
Williams (1958) lysan — sanctipetri — 
Roxas and Agco (1941) lysan tala tolooparah tol 
Weber and lysan tala tolooparah tol 
De Beaufort (1931) sanctipetri 
Wakiya (1924) lysan _ sanctipetri formosanus 
orientalis 
moadetta 
Day (1878) lysan tala sanctipetri moadetta 
toloo 


and Seale (1905, p. 774) to describe a new genus and species based on juveniles 
of S. tala. The failure of recent workers to critically read original descriptions 
and examine types adequately has resulted in the consistent misapplication of 
the name Scomberoides lysan (Forskal). Because of the confused nomenclature 
of Scomberoides species, we present in table 1 a list of the species recognized in 
several major papers with our present allocation of them. An annotated list of 
the nominal species of Scomberoides and Oligoplites is given in the appendix. 

NOMENCLATURE. Considerable confusion exists as to whether Scomberoides 
Lacépéde, 1802 was validly described and thereby has priority over Chorinemus 
Cuvier, 1831. Williams (1958) briefly discussed the problem and rejected 
Scomberoides, as did Weber and De Beaufort (1931) and Smith (1970). Re- 
jection of Scomberoides as a valid generic name by several recent workers is 
probably attributable to the comments of Barnard (1927, p. 562) who credits 
the rejected name to Lacépéde (1800), in which only a figure is given with the 
caption ‘“Scomberoide commersonnien.” Jordan (1917, p. 60) rightly credits 
Scomberoides to Lacépéde (1802), in which ‘‘Les Scomberoides” was latinized 
to accommodate the description of three new species. Caranx and Trachinotus, 
widely accepted carangid generic names, originate from the same work and were 
described in the same manner as Scomberoides. 

Williams (1958, p. 416) states that “the use of Chorinemus has been common 
and widespread since 1833 whilst Scomberoides has been restricted (except 
Wakiya, 1924) to American authors of the last 75 years.”’ He further states 
“should Scomberoides be proved to have priority over Chorinemus C.V..... : 
then a case exists for submission to the International Commission of Zoological 
Nomenclature for a suspension of the Rules, in that strict application of the 
Rules will clearly result in greater confusion than uniformity.” In their review 


192 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


of the Philippine Carangidae Roxas and Agco (1941) used Scomberoides as did 
Oshima (1925) and McCulloch (1929). Except for Rofen (1963), American 
authors of the last 75 years, the most recent of which are Gosline and Brock 
(1965), have consistently used Scomberoides instead of Chorinemus. Although 
Williams apparently attaches little importance to this, it should be noted that 
American authors are responsible for a large portion of the literature treating 
these fishes. 

Confusion alse exists as to what constitutes the type-species of the genus. 
Several workers have recognized Scomberoides noelii as the type-species. 
Lacépede (1802) described three species in his new genus, listing them on page 
50 with brief diagnoses (descriptions expanded on following pages) in the fol- 
lowing order: (1) Scomberoides noelii; (2) S. commersonianus; (3) S. saltator. 
He did not, however, specifically designate a type-species. The first author to 
subsequently designate a type-species for Scomberoides in accordance with 
Article 69a of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature was Jordan 
(1917, p. 60), who selected S. commersonianus. The published illustration of 
S. commersonianus (as “Scomberoide commersonnien”) (Lacépéde, 1800 pl. 
20, Fig. 3) is sufficiently accurate for positive identification. 

The possession of needlelike scales does distinguish the type-species of Rhaph- 
iolepis from its congeners. However, the transition from oval-shaped to needle- 
like scales is obvious in Scomberoides (see figure 3), and we do not believe that 
recognition of subgenera in such a small group of closely related species is 
justified. The sole character mentioned in the original description to distinguish 
Eleria from Scomberoides was based on unrecognized ontogenetic changes in 
dentition (see discussion under S. tala). Reasons for referral of Palaeoscomber 
to the synonymy of Scomberoides are discussed under S. spinosus. 

DeEscrIPTION. Body moderately to strongly compressed. Adipose eyelids mod- 
erately to poorly developed. Body, except head, covered with embedded scales, 
broadly lanceolate to needlelike. Lateral-line scales not developed into scutes. 
Lateral line without side branches, straight except for slight curve over pectoral 
fin. Anterior rim of shoulder girdle smooth, without fleshy papillae or deep 
groove near isthmus. Premaxillae not protractile, connected anteriorly to snout 
at midline by a wide fleshy bridge. Swimbladder strongly bifid posteriorly, 
length of bifurcated portion of swimbladder equal to or greater than undivided 
part. Posterior dorsal- and anal-fin rays consisting of semidetached finlets, 
distal fourth to half of ray not connected by interradial membrane (unattached 
portion of rays increasing with growth); ultimate and penultimate rays more 
closely spaced than adjoining rays, fully connected by interradial membrane; 
none of dorsal- or anal-fin rays produced into long filaments. Pelvic fins rel- 
atively short, depressible into shallow abdominal grooves. Pectoral fins short, 
not falcate, 53 to 71 percent head length in adults. Maxilla extends posteriorly 


Vout. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 193 


from middle of eye to well behind orbital rim, 43 to 65 percent head length, 
in adults. 

Predorsal bones 3, rarely 4 (4 in one of 60 specimens); dorsal-fin rays VI 
or VII + I, 19-21; total dorsal-fin rays 27-29. Anal-fin rays II + I, 16-20. 
Pectoral-fin rays I, 16-18. Pelvic-fin rays I, 5. Vertebrae 10 + 16 = 26; 
epipleural ribs 9 or 10. Branchiostegal rays 3 + 5 (epihyal + ceratohyal). 
Upper gillrakers 0-8; lower gillrakers 7-20; total gillrakers 8-27. 

Fronto-supraoccipital crest low; temporal crest extending forward to edge 
of cranium slightly in front of middle of orbit; preorbital region short. Epiotics 
broadly united along midline of cranium internally. Zygapophyses of exoccipital 
joined beneath foramen magnum. Parasphenoid not expanded into a broad, 
flattened plate posteriorly. Myodome with broad, posterior opening. Basi- 
occipital without a pair of lateral processes on ventral surface. Ascending process 
of premaxilla short and triangular; maxilla long and slender, rather closely 
attached to premaxilla. Premaxillary spur absent. Small supramaxilla present. 
Interosseous space between dorsal arm of dentary and upper margin of articular 
greatly reduced. Well developed teeth on dentary, premaxilla, palatine, and 
vomer; two distinct rows of dentary teeth (see discussion under Zoogeography 
and Relationships Section); symphyseal premaxillary and dentary teeth of 
juveniles (except S. /ysan) robust and caniniform. Mesopterygoids covered with 
firmly ankylosed, minute, granular teeth. Pharyngeals not noticeably enlarged, 
covered with sharp, pointed teeth. 

Well developed suborbital shelf present; lower and posterior suborbitals 
not greatly expanded posteriorly. Basibranchials 1-2 with a pair of tooth 
plates, third basibranchial with two or more irregular tooth plates. Lower limb 
of posttemporal not noticeably short or thickened. Postcoracoid process absent. 
Interpelvic keel well developed; post pelvic process of each side coalesced entire 
length, not forming an apical fork. Inferior vertebral foramina absent. First 
anal pterygiophore and haemal spine of first caudal vertebra firmly attached 
to form a strong strut. Anal pterygiophore expanded anterolaterally to form 
roof over first two anal spines; first two anal spines articulated proximally 
with each other; second anal spine asymmetrical, with deep groove on one side 
of anterior face. Caudal skeleton with 2 epurals and 2 pairs of uroneurals. 


Key To Recent Spectres oF Scomberoides 


Color pattern will readily separate most specimens of the four species. In large individuals 
and especially in small specimens that are not freshly caught the spots may fade or completely 
disappear; this is particularly true of fish market specimens. 


aeeGalirakerses) tom is dorsal-tine lobe) unttonmly plemented = 2 
1b. Gillrakers 21 to 27; distal half of dorsal-fin lobe abruptly and heavily pigmented __ 3 
2a. Large oval blotches above or touching lateral line; upper jaw extends well beyond 

posterior margin of eye, especially in adults (fig. 2a); snout 21 to 26 (mean 23.4) 


194 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


percent HL; dentary teeth of inner and outer rows subequal in adults; specimen fig- 
UL ell yp oS cat ven ae ee 2 Et ie ee ee S. commersonianus 
2b. Vertically elongate blotches intersecting lateral line; upper jaw extends slightly beyond 
posterior margin of eye (fig. 2b); snout 26 to 30 (mean 28.2) percent HL; inner row 
dentary teeth distinctly larger than outer row teeth in adults; specimen figure 1b —__ S. tala 
3a. Double series of 6 to 8 dusky, roundish blotches above and below lateral line, occasionally 
connected by narrow isthmus; scales lanceolate (fig. 3b) ; specimen figure 1c ___ S. lysan 


¢ 


3b. Oval or vertically oblong blotches, the first 4 or 5 intersecting lateral line; scales slender, 
needlelike -(fig) Sd); specimen figure Id) 22 == Eee Ss Hal! 


Scomberoides commersonianus Lacépéde. 
(Figures la, 2a, 3a, 4a, 5—7, 14c, 16b, 19, 23b, 25b; tables 2-3.) 
Scomberoides commersonianus LACEPEDE, 1802, p. 50 (type locality Madagascar). 

Scomber madagascariensis SHAW, 1803, p. 590, pl. 85 (type locality Madagascar). 
Chorinemus exoletus EHRENBERG in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 379 (278) (based 
solely on an unpublished drawing by Ehrenberg of a fish from Lohaia, Red Sea). 
Chorinemus delicatulus RICHARDSON, 1846, p. 269 (based solely on a drawing in the Reeves 

Collection of Chinese fish drawings). 
Chorinemus leucopthalmus RicHARDSON, 1846, p. 269 (based solely on a drawing in the 
Reeves Collection of Chinese fish drawings). 


NOMENCLATURE. The figure of S. commersonianus (as “Scombéroide com- 
mersonnien”) and original description are sufficiently accurate for positive 
identification, and the name has consistently been applied to the correct species, 
although usually in synonymy (see nomenclature section under S. lysan). Al- 
though in the original description S. commersonianus was spelled with a double 
“n,”’ we prefer the emended spelling with a single “‘n,’’ which is correct. 

The description of Chorinemus exoletus refers to a deep-bodied species with 
a long upper jaw. This together with the stated type locality is sufficient to 
confidently identify it as conspecific with S. commersonianus. 

Whitehead (1969) has published the original drawings upon which the de- 
scriptions of Chorinemus delicatulus and C. leucopthalmus are based. These 
drawings and that of Scomber madagascariensis are reasonably diagnostic and 
are undoubtedly based on S. commersonianus. Although the large oval blotches 
characteristic of S. commersonianus are not shown on the sides of Chorinemus 
delicatulus and C. leucopthalmus, they rapidly fade and disappear in dead 
specimens. 

DescripTION. Characters given in the generic description are not repeated 
here. Frequency distributions of selected meristic characters are given in table 
2. Dorsal-fin rays VI-VII + I, 19-21; anal-fin rays II + I, 16-19; pectoral- 
fin rays, I, 17-19. Gillrakers 0-3 + 7-12 = 8-15. Upper jaw extending well 
beyond posterior margin of eye, especially in adults (fig. 2a). Scales broadly 
lanceolate (fig. 3a). Inner and outer row of dentary teeth subequal in adults 
(fig. 4a); dentary typically with one or two pair of symphyseal canines, at least 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 195 


Ficure 1. Scomberoides species: a, S. commersonianus, TABL 107366, 468 mm. FL; 
b, S. tala, TABL 107365, 464 mm. FL; c, S. lysan, TABL 107364, 523 mm. IGS Ch, ual 
TABL 107363, 450 mm. FL. 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


196 


16 


Ch Caen OKamemmamer CL 9 CemeS come ce me 6 = pa Aa Eg 104 
CEG SANS Gk OG AG. AS UDsK] 
ONC S0 ae en en oe Cee at a SI Oy OC UN e kee fae —— DIDI 
OSS Oe erie eee eee i i eee OL Lb SSieasole alin (x “SIUDIUOSHOUINLOD 
x INC 4E M6 Se we BE be Ie OW ON rN A OL Si i wy Al je O 6 § sotedg 
SISAeA (ED [BIOL 
LES. Ce ai on a ce OS Oa sey eS Cg JIE an ae! 2 ps 101 
SVC Os aes Ss Sy SS WO Bo Y CG Wy We G@ Wo = S32 = UDSK] 
eee Se pee toe C2 Ol SS Sap e: L GUS ORS a TO: Oia DIDI 
ae meee he Bol) Dee OC SOT. T OS © 3 nee eee STC) COSTELLO SMOULLOD 
sl 2 OW St awl el @ i OW @ & 2 See NGS ci sie 6 Ol Ste” Cw eco) oles RO sataedg 
SIOYVY [[ID JoMmo'T SIIYeY [ED 1toddq 
G 89 ce = ae S02 16 ov vy T 68 G 104 
=a L £8 s = 0°02 v6 8 £8 € 98 8 UDSK] 
aaa 9 08 € ce 6°61 06 9 el IT v8 9 DIDI 
= ¢ TZ eT (4 L161 L8 T £9 (BG £8 v SNUDIMOSAAUULOD 
0Z 61 SI LT OT x N 14 02 61 TAS SrA satadg 
SABY PoyUIUI5IS SABY Pa}UaUISISG soutds 'q 


sAby Ul_-[eUYy 


SsABY UlA-[esiog 


"$a19agS SaplO1aqwuorg U2 S4azIDADYI IYSiMaU {Oo UOoLNQrysYp KoUaNbatg *7 AAV, 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 197 


Cc d 


Ficure 2. Upper jaw development of adult Scomberoides species: a, S. commersonianus, 
TABL 107192, 355 mm. FL; b, S. tala, TABL 107712, 351 mm. FL; c, S. lysan, TABL 107364, 
412 mm. FL; d, S. tol, TABL 107714, 410 mm. FL. Maxilla shown in black. 


in young; young with dentary teeth of outer row numerous and considerably 
more closely spaced than inner row teeth. 

Proportional measurements apply only to specimens longer than 150 mm. 
FL, and are expressed as percent FL unless otherwise stated. Depth (origin 
Dz to Ag) 25.7-36.2; height dorsal-fin lobe 14.4-19.8; height anal-fin lobe 13.5- 
18.5; upper jaw 55.9-64.6 percent head length; snout 20.6—26.0 percent head 
length. 

PIGMENTATION. Sides with 5 to 8 large oval blotches above or touching 
lateral line, first two may intersect lateral line. Dorsal and anal fins uniformly 
pigmented. Pectoral fin of adults frequently with a dusky blotch ventrally. 
In life, body gray to silvery white ventrally, dusky green or bluish dorsally; 


198 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


TABLE 3. Comparison of several proportional measurements in Scomberoides species 
expressed as hundredths of head length. 


Upper Jaw Length Snout Length 
<20 cm. = = 

Species Range FL N Range x Range % 
commersonianus 82-198 19 59-64 60.1 21-26 23.6 
tala 71-199 23 53-61 58.2 26-30 28.3 
lysan 45-189 20 51-56 53.9 28-31 29.0 
tol 44-181 17 47-51 48.6 30-33 Sue3 

Upper Jaw Length Snout Length 

re pper J g g 

Species Range FL N Range X Range x 
commersonianus 224-943 64 56-65 60.6 21-26 23.4 
tala 201-571 58 54-61 57.8 26-30 28.2 
lysan 201-585 65 50-54 51.6 28-32 30.0 
tol 209-468 70 43-49 46.3 29-33 Silks 


lateral blotches plumbeous gray. Large individuals often golden, especially 
ventrally. Annunziata and Cedrone (1972, p. 61) present a color photograph 
of a large specimen from Madagascar. 

DISTRIBUTION. Widely distributed throughout the Indian Ocean and Indo- 
Australian Archipelago. The species has also been reliably reported from the 
Red Sea and Persian Gulf. Scomberoides commersonianus appears to be re- 
stricted to neritic waters and does not occur east of the New Guinea-Solomon 
Islands region. Records of the species (as S. /ysan) from Tahiti and other 
central Pacific islands are based on misidentifications. 

MATERIAL (96 specimens, 82—943 mm. FL, from 53 collections). KENYA: 
Mombasa Fish Market, TABL uncataloged Anton Bruun cruise 9 station, FT-2 
(1: 398). WEST PAKISTAN: off Karachi, TABL uncataloged (3: 236-295). 
INDIA: Gulf of Kutch, TABL uncataloged (1: 203); Bombay, TABL 107190 
(1: 384), 107350 (1: 158); Palk Strait, TABL 107292 (4: 127-288), TABL 
uncataloged FHB 66-36 (1: 766); Porto Novo, TABL 107303 (1: 198), TABL 
uncataloged (1: 190). CEYLON: TABL 107192 FJS 69-41 (9: 327-422), 
FJS 69-45 (6: 195-244), FJS 69-64 (1: 474), FJS 69-50 (1: 400), TABL 
107366 S-V 69-77 (3: 303-476), S-V 69-86 (2: 224-254), S-V 69-126 (1: 335), 
S-V 69-151 (2: 754-762), PCH 69-183 (1: 617), PCH 69-185 (7: 123-158), 
TABL 107715 PCH 69-201 (3: 398-443), PCH 69-218 (10: 130-168), PCH 
69-267 (1: 503), PCH 69-305 (1: 913), CCK 69-1 (1: 843), CCK 69-44 
(1: 797), CCK 69-53 (1: 475), CCK 69-60 (7: 234-349), CCK 69-97 (2: 160- 
218). GULF OF THAILAND: GVF station 57-45 (2: 355-391), GVF station 
57-92 (1: 520), GVF station 57-83 (2: 559-579), GVF station 60-113 (2: 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 199 


849-943), GVF station 60-146 (2: 727-729), GVF-1548 (1: 133), GVF-1557 
(2: 186-197), GVF-2195 (1: 93, cleared and stained), GVF-2513 (2: 727-739), 
GVF-2546 (1: 291), GVF-2547 (6: 243-612). HONG KONG: GVF station 
HiK-111 (1: 829). PHILIPPINES: Luzon, USNM 72190 (1: 172), 83447 
(1: 241), 168322 (1: 309), SU 20341 (2: 82-116); Samar, USNM 149810 
(1: 129); Iloilo, USNM 72189 (1: 129), 149812 (1: 152); Palawan, USNM 
149813 (1: 128), 149815 (1: 151). NORTH BORNEO: Sandakan, USNM 
149814 (1: 172), 168323 (1: 234). JAVA: Djakarta, TABL 107300 (1: 266). 
AUSTRALIA: Western Australia, Exmouth Gulf, Onslow, WAM P.2772 (1: 
302), P.15487 (1: 175); Port Hedland, WAM P.180 (1: 329); Broome, WAM 
P.555 (1: 95); Northern Territory, Charles Point, AMS IA.7781 (1: 164); 
Port Darwin, AMS 1.9778 (1: 300), IA.4375 (1: 280); Darwin, AMS 1B.3168 
(1: 420), IB.3171 (1: 85); Bedwell Point, AMS IA.7678 (1: 356); Gulf of 
Carpentaria, Groote Eylandt, USNM 173954 (4 of 7: 240-345); 17°22’S., 
149°45’E., AMS T.15557-118 (5: 87-172) ; Queensland, Burdekin River, USNM 
47835 (1: 275), AMS A.18299-300 (2: 285-615); Lindeman Island, AMS 
IA.6279 (1: 297); Hayman Island, AMS IA.6104 (1: 460); New South Wales, 
Port Jackson, USNM 47910 (1: 357). NEW GUINEA: AMS A.12694 (1: 
300); Port Moresby, AMS 1.13357 (1: 565). 


Scomberoides tala (Cuvier). 

(Figures 1b, 2b, 3c, 4b, 5-7, 15b, 17, 19, 24b; tables 2-3.) 

Chorinemus tala CUVIER in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 377 (type locality Malabar). 

?Chorinemus toloo Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 377 (description based on 
“toloo parah” RUSSELL, 1803, p. 29, pl. 137, Vizagapatam). 

Eleria philippina JorpAN and SEALE, 1905, p. 744, fig. 1 (type locality Negros Island, 
Philippines). 

Chorinemus hainanensis Cuu and CHENG, 1958, p. 317, fig. 2 (type localities Sanya, Kanchium, 
Kwonghoi, and Chinglan, China). 


NOMENCLATURE. In the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle there are 
two collections (A. 6587 and A. 6588) from Malabar, collected by Belanger, 
which are labeled syntypes of Chorinemus tala Cuvier. A. 6588, here designated 
lectotype of C. tala, is a single specimen 298 mm. SL. A. 6587 consists of two 
specimens of S. tol Cuvier. In his treatment of the western Indian Ocean species 
of Scomberoides, Smith (1970, p. 221) referred S. tol to the synonymy of S. tala. 
This erroneous action was based on his examination of one of the specimens of 
A.6587. Smith apparently was unaware of the existence of other material 
labeled as types of S. tala, and fortunately did not designate a lectotype. 

Although Weber and De Beaufort (1931, p. 282) and Smith (1970, p. 219) 
considered the species insufficiently described for positive identification, the 
following statements given in the original description of Chorinemus tala leave 
no doubt as to its specific identity: (1) “Chorinemus tala differs [from the 


200 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 3. Scales of Scomberoides species (from area between anal-fin origin and lateral 
line): a, S. commersonianus, TABL 107715, 398 mm. FL; b, S. lysan, TABL 107364, 412 mm. 
FL: c, S. tala, TABL 107712, 370 mm. FL: d, S. tol, TABL 107714, 410 emma Hees seale: 
20.0 mm. 


preceding species, C. commersonianus | by a smaller gape, a maxillary that hardly 
extends beyond the posterior border of the orbit. (2) The maxillary is, in 
addition, covered by the suborbital and only shows its posterior third; it is 
enlarged more posteriorly and is cut off more squarely. (3) The teeth are 
stronger in proportion. (4) The curve of the snout is a little less straight .. . , 
but the shape of the body, the scales, the lateral line and the number of rays 
are as in the preceding species.” 

Statement 4 and the fact that S. tala was compared with S. commersonianus, 
suggest that the name S. tala applies to a deep-bodied species with high fin 
lobes. Scomberoides tol and S. lysan are both relatively slender species (fig. 6) 
and have shorter fin lobes (fig. 7) than do the other two species of Scomberoides. 
Statements 1 and 4 exclude S. tol, in which the maxilla does not reach the pos- 
terior border of the orbit and the scales are needle-shaped (fig. 3d). Statement 
3 excludes S. lysan and S. tol, in which the teeth in both jaws are relatively 
small in adults and applies best to the species here recognized as S. tala, which 
has the largest teeth (fig. 4b). Statements 1 and 2 are sufficient to exclude 
S. commersonianus (compare figs. 2a and 2b). 

The fact that Cuvier recognized S. commersonianus (and several of its 
synonyms) and described as new, from Malabar specimens, examples of the 
three remaining valid species of Scomberoides leaves no doubt that he was able 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 201 


10 mm 


Ficure 4. Dentary teeth of adult Scomberoides species: a, S. commersonianus; b, 
S. tala, c, S. lysan, d, S. tol. Data as in figure 2. Teeth of inner row shown in black. 


to distinguish them. It is obvious from his description of S. fala that he would 
not have confused it with S. tol. At some time type labels or MNHN catalog 
numbers must have become inadvertently mixed. Since the description of S. tol 
was based in part on specimens from Malabar, the two specimens of that species 
labeled as types of S. tala are here designated putative paralectotypes of Scom- 
beroides tol (Cuvier). 

Russell’s poor figure of ‘“toloo parah,” upon which the original description 
of Chorinemus toloo is based, cannot be positively identified as S. tala, although 
it most closely resembles that species. Weber and De Beaufort (1931) included 
S. toloo in their synonymy of Scomberoides tala; the figure of Chorinemus toloo 
published in Day’s Fishes of India is clearly referable to S. tala. 

Jordan and Seale distinguished their new genus and species, Eleria philip pina, 
from Scomberoides solely on the basis of strong symphyseal canines on the lower 
jaw. They apparently were unaware that such canines are typically present in 
the young of S. tala. 

The description and figure of Chorinemus hainanensis leave no doubt as to 
the identity of this nominal species. In their description, Chu and Cheng em- 
phasized the absence of spots on side of body. Like a number of authors, they 
were not cognizant of the fact that these spots frequently fade completely. 

DEScRIPTION. Characters given in the generic description are not repeated 
here. Frequency distributions of selected meristic characters are given in table 
2. Dorsal-fin rays VI-VII + I, 19-21; anal-fin rays IJ + I, 17-19; pectoral- 


202 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


110 


100 


COMMERSONIANUS 
90 TALA 
LYSAN 
TOL 


80 


=> 
=> 70 
== 
S60 
za 
LJ 
—J 
ae 
<q 
= 
o 40 
lJ 
QO 
oO 
=) 


30 


20 


) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 
SNOUT- POSTORBIT LENGTH (MM) 


Ficure 5. Relationship of upper jaw length to snout-postorbit length in Scomberoides 
species. Dashed lines represent upper jaw length as percent snout-postorbit length. 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 203 


260 
s 
240 
s 
s 
| s 
220 . 
COMMERSONIANUS a 
TALA . 
ai LYSAN =n 
= TOL . 
= 180 . 
of = 2 
N Oo 
aq 160 . 
o 
o 
2 2 7 26% 
4 
w 140 . ay a4 
fa) eat RI ® 
Oo s. 
Oo nA 
ie e 
Z 120 "ome “Ns 
— ie) = ef e 
© ote “fae ee 
= - .? “es, 
= 100 stig of Pes ? 
ro) 7108 So 
Care ave 
i ZA Eo) 
s y » 
sid of a eer@on es 
oO q™ s ge 0585 5° 
fo} 
lu ae Ve % 
a dig 
60 af 5 
BF epeasoo 
rs ete 
Fo 
40 fo) 
Past 
ot 
° 
20 “EP 
ff 
° l 
° 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 


FORK LENGTH ~ (MM) 


Ficure 6. Relationship of body depth to fork length in Scomberoides species. Dashed 
line represents depth as percent fork length. 


fin rays I, 16-17. Gillrakers 1-3 + 7-11 = 11-15. Upper jaw extending slightly 
beyond posterior margin of eye in adults (fig. 2b). Scales lanceolate (fig. 3c). 
Inner row of dentary teeth distinctly larger than outer row teeth in adults (fig. 
4b); dentary typically with one or two pair of symphyseal canines in young; 
young with dentary teeth of outer row numerous and considerably more closely 
spaced than inner row teeth. 

Proportional measurements apply only to specimens more than 150 mm. 
fork length (FL), and are in percent FL unless otherwise stated. Depth (origin 
Ds to As) 29.0-34.9; height dorsal-fin lobe 14.6-18.0; height anal-fin lobe 
13.1-16.2; upper jaw 54.3-61.6 percent head length; snout 26.1—30.1 percent 
head length. 


204 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


160 


140 


(MM) 


COMMERSONIANUS 
TALA 


LYSAN 
120 TOL 


LOBE 


100 


80 


60 


40 


20 


HEIGHT SECOND DORSAL-FIN 


° 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 


FORK LENGTH (MM) 


Ficure 7. Relationship of dorsal-fin lobe height to fork length in Scomberoides species. 
Dashed line represents dorsal-fin lobe height as percent fork length. 


PIGMENTATION. Sides with 4 to 8 vertically elongate blotches, most of them 
intersecting lateral line. Dorsal and anal fins uniformly pigmented. Life color- 
ation not observed. 

DISTRIBUTION. Widely distributed throughout the Indo-Australian Archi- 
pelago, and the Bay of Bengal in the Indian Ocean. Although more collections 
are needed, the apparent absence of the species from the western Indian Ocean, 
Red Sea, and Persian Gulf appears to be real. Scomberoides tala is apparently 
restricted to neritic waters, and does not occur east of the New Guinea-Solomon 
Islands region. 

MATERIAL (110 specimens, 31—615 mm. FL from 45 collections). CEYLON: 
TABL 107365 FJS 69-27 (2: 295-464), S-V 69-77 (1: 560), S-V 69-156 (1: 
116, cleared and stained), TABL 107712 CCK 69-43 (12: 244-490), CCK 
69-45 (3: 517-567), CCK 69-53 (4: 265-474), CCK 69-54 (2: 197-565), 
CCK 69-89 (8: 366-483), CCK 69-94 (1: 505), CCK 69-104 (2: 529-551), 
CCK 69-111 (1: 568). INDIA: Malabar, MNHN A. 6588 (315, lectotype 


Vor. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 205 


of Chorinemus tala); Madras, AMS B. 8124 (1: 197); Calcutta, AMS B. 8093 
(1: 115). BURMA: Maungmagan Island, SU 33635 (2: 91-95). ANDAMAN 
ISLAND: AMS I. 68 (1: 57). GULF OF THAILAND: GVF station 57-90 
(1: 87), GVF station 57-99 (1: 167), GVF-1470 (4: 185-214), GVF-1503 
(1: 176), TABL 107040 GVF-1512 (5: 190-219), GVF-2195 (1: 45), GVF- 
meio: 31-71), GVE-2203 (1: 131), GVF-2222 (3: 183-198), GVE-2497 
(2: 159-161), GVF-2540 (1: 345), GVF-2546 (12: 219-275). MALAYSIA: 
Penang, TABL 107266 FJS 69-79 m. (3: 168-183). PHILIPPINES: Luzon, 
USNM 65339 (1: 265), 149803 (3: 110-132), 149804 (1: 80); Batangas 
Prov., CAS uncataloged (6: 135-172); Manila Bay, CAS uncataloged (1: 165); 
Leyete, USNM 149805 (1: 178), 149811 (1: 178); Mindanao, USNM 55990 
(1: 271); Matnog Bay, USNM 194913 (1: 218); Balabac Island, AMS I. 10478 
(1: 220); Southern Negros, USNM 51945 (98, holotype of Eleria philippina), 
zon ho 112), SU 9131 (2: 103-111). JAVA: USNM 72616 (2: 157=161), 
72617 (1: 118), 72618 (1: 109), 72619 (1: 114). AUSTRALIA: Northern 
Territory, Port Darwin, AMS I. 5291-2 (2: 76-100), IA. 3639 (1: 67); Gulf 
of Carpentaria, Groote Eylandt, USNM 173957 (5: 317-339); Queensland, Cape 
York, BMNH 1879.5.14.282 (1: 381); Fitzory River Estuary, AMS IB. 1249 
(io )e NEW BRITAIN: 4°19’S. 152°1’E., GVF station HK-130 (1: 615). 
SOLOMON ISLANDS: Bougainville, AMS IB. 1458 (1: 219). 


Scomberoides lysan (Forskal). 
(Figures 1c, 2c, 3b, 4c, 5—7, 19; tables 2-3.) 


Scomber lysan ForsKAL, 1775, p. 54 (type locality Djeddae and Lohajae, Red Sea). 

Scomber forsteri BLocH and SCHNEIDER, 1801, p. 26 (type locality Pacific Ocean [based on 
Scomber maculatus Forster MS]). 

Lichia tolooparah RUPPELL, 1828, p. 91 (type locality Massawa, Red Sea). 

Chorinemus sanctipetri Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 379 (279) (type locality 
Malabar coast). 

Chorinemus moadetta EHRENBERG in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 382 (282) (based 
on an unpublished drawing by Ehrenberg of a fish from the Red Sea). 

Chorinemus mauritianus Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 382 (282) (type locality 
l’Isle-de-France [=Mauritius Island]). 

Scomber maculatus Forster, 1844, p. 195 (type locality Tahiti). 

Chorinemus orientalis TEMMINCK and SCHLEGEL, 1844, p. 106, pl. 57, fig. 1 (type locality 
Nagasaki, Japan). 

Thynnus moluccensis GRoNoviuS in Gray, 1854, p. 121 (type locality Insulas Moluccenses). 

Scomberoides formosanus OSHIMA (non Wakiya), 1925, p. 349, pl. 1, fig. 1 (type locality 
Toko, Formosa). 

Scomberoides oshimae WHITLEY, 1951, p. 65 (replacement name for Scomberoides formosanus 
OsHIMA, 1925, preoccupied). 


NOMENCLATURE. The description of S. /ysan is inadequate for positive identi- 
fication, but the following statements given by Forskal suggest that he did not 
have S. commersonianus (= ‘lysan’ of recent workers): (1) scales lanceolate 


206 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc, 4TH SER. 


(in “SS. lysan” they are usually referred to as ovate or broadly lanceolate) ; 
(2) “about the lateral line there are obsolete | ?indistinct|] dark spots”; (3) 
dentes [teeth] numerous, small. Ruppell (1828), who set out especially to 
clarify the identities of Forskal’s Red Sea fishes, applied the name ‘lysan’ to 
S. commersonianus. His application of the name, however, was based on the 
fact that native fishermen referred to that species as “lysan.” Smith (1968, 
p. 174) has clearly shown that native names of Red Sea fishes were often not 
specific. Cuvier and Valenciennes (1831) did not believe the description of 
S. lysan was sufficiently diagnostic for positive identification. They did, how- 
ever, state that since Forskal’s description contained no mention of a dark 
blotch in the second dorsal fin, they were hesitant to refer it to their Chorinemus 
moadetta. Ginther (1860) and all subsequent workers have regarded S. lysan 
as a senior synonym of S. commersonianus. 

Klausewitz and Nielsen (1965, pl. 25) have published an excellent photograph 
and radiograph of the 216 mm. SL lectotype (ZMC 44) of Scomber lysan, re- 
produced without comment in Smith (1970). The most distinctive feature of 
the lectotype is the position of the maxilla, which ends below the middle of 
the eye. It is also apparent from the radiograph that the snout has been pushed 
in on the dried skin, giving the snout an atypically blunt appearance. Since the 
maxilla extended well beyond the posterior margin of the orbit in all our spec- 
imens, we suspected that the ‘/ysan’ of recent authors was not the same species 
as the lectotype. Accordingly we wrote Dr. Jérgen Nielsen and asked him to 
examine the lectotype for us. The following information, largely provided by 
Dr. Nielsen, is sufficient to identify the lectotype as conspecific with S. tolo- 
oparah of recent workers: (1) Although there are no teeth left in the outer 
dentary row, judging from the sockets the missing teeth were the same size and 
number as those of the inner row, which excludes S. tala (see fig. 4); (2) com- 
parison of the premaxillary teeth also excludes S. tala; (3) there are no sym- 
physeal canines left. Symphyseal canines are never present in S. lysan, and 
usually are still retained in specimens of S. commersonianus and S. tala at this 
size; (4) the length of the upper jaw is 21 mm.; the dentary is 30 mm. The 
1:1.5 ratio between the length of the upper jaw and dentary agrees fairly well 
with similar sized specimens of S. tolooparah and is sufficiently different to ex- 
clude S. commersonianus; (5) the scales of the paralectotype and the lectotype 
are the same size and form. Comparison of a small patch of skin (scales included) 
removed from the paralectotype just anterior to the spinous dorsal fin with 
scales from the same area of the four species of Scomberoides is sufficient to 
exclude S. tol, S. commersonianus, and, with less confidence, S. fala. The most 
diagnostic feature of these scales is their strongly lanceolate posterior margins 
(see fig. 3). 

Unfortunately, the name S. /ysan (applied to S. commersonianus by recent 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 207 


authors) must be retained as a senior synonym of the widely used S. tolooparah. 
It would be difficult to justify suppression of the name, however, since it is 
not simply an overlooked synonym of S. tolooparah. Scomberoides forsteri is 
also a senior synonym of S. tolooparah; and S. sanctipetri, a junior synonym, 
has frequently been recognized as a valid species. Although carangids are com- 
mercially important fishes, most genera have not been adequately revised, and 
consequently many of the names currently in use may eventually prove to be 
synonyms. 

Although the descriptions of Scomber forstert and S. maculatus are poor, 
they apply best to S. lysan. Since the type locality of S. maculatus (and thus 
that of S. forsteri as well) is Tahiti, an area from which only S. lysan is known, 
there can be little doubt as to the specific identity of either nominal species. 
The characters given for Chorinemus moadetta, and comparison of it in the 
original description with Forskal’s S. lysan, leaves no doubt that it too is a 
junior synonym of S. lysan. 

Smith (1970) presents photographs of the holotypes of Lichia tolooparah 
(NFIS 386) and Chorinemus sanctipetri (MNHN A. 6587). They are both 
clearly synonyms of S. lysan. Likewise, the original descriptions and figures of 
Chorinemus orientalis and Scomberoides formosanus agree well with S. lysan. 
The description and insular type locality of Chorinemus mauritianus are also 
sufficient to identify it as conspecific with S. lysan. 

We have not examined the type of Thynnus moluccensis, but according to 
Wheeler (1958, p. 220) it is a synonym of Chorinemus sanctipetri (= S. lysan). 
The 142 mm. SL holotype bears the catalog number BMNH 1853. 11.12.29. 

DEscRIPTION. Characters given in the generic description are not repeated 
here. Frequency distribution of selected meristic characters are given in table 
2. Dorsal-fin rays VI-VII+I, 19-21, anal-fin rays II-I, 17-19; pectoral-fin 
rays I, 16-17. Gillrakers 3-8 + 15-20 = 21-27. Upper jaw extending to or 
slightly beyond (in large adults) posterior margin of eye (fig. 2c). Scales lan- 
ceolate (fig. 3b). Inner and outer row of dentary teeth subequal in adults (fig. 
4c); dentary without symphyseal canines; young with dentary teeth of outer 
row numerous and considerably more closely spaced than inner row teeth. 

Proportional measurements apply only to specimens more than 150 mm. 
fork length (FL), and are in percent FL unless otherwise stated. Depth (origin 
Ds to Ag) 20.9-27.3; height dorsal-fin lobe 9.1-14.2; height anal-fin lobe 7.7— 
11.6; upper jaw 50.3-54.6 percent head length; snout 27.8-31.8 percent head 
length. 

PIGMENTATION. Sides of adults with a double series of 6 to 8 dusky round- 
ish blotches above and below lateral line, occasionally connected by narrow 
isthmus. Distal half of dorsal-fin lobe abruptly and heavily pigmented; anal- 
fin lobe white or pale yellow, often with interradial membranes of several 


208 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


anterior rays black, especially in large individuals. In life, body gray-green 
above, silvery gray to midline, silvery white below. 

DISTRIBUTION. Widely distributed throughout the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, 
Indo-Australian Archipelago and central Pacific Ocean including Hawaii and 
the Marquesas Islands. Scomberoides lysan is the only species of Scomberoides 
that occurs east of the Solomon Islands and frequents entirely oceanic islands 
in the Indian Ocean, e.g., Seychelles and Chagos Archipelago. The other species 
of Scomberoides are generally restricted to neritic habitats. This suggests a 
fundamental difference in the biology of S. lysan. 

MATERIAL (276 specimens, 20-585 mm. FL from 109 collections). TAN- 
ZANIA: Zanzibar, TABL 105602 (1: 281). MADAGASCAR: USNM 171034 
(1: 336), TABL uncataloged station JR-68 (1: 54). MAURITIUS ISLAND: 
USNM 118407 (13: 256-403). COMORO ISLANDS: TABL uncataloged 
station FT-9 (2: 45-46), TABL uncataloged station HA-8 (1: 123), HA-10 
(1: 52). ALDABRA ISLAND: TABL uncataloged station HA 67-56 (1: 385). 
CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO: Diego Garcia Atoll, TABL uncataloged station 
HA 67-42 (2: 83-113), HA 67-43 (3: 146-154). INDIA: Malabar, MNHN 
A. 5893 (480, holotype of Chorinemus sanctipetri); Madras, AMS B. 8091 (3: 
110-128). CEYLON: TABL 107364 FJS 69-27 (2: 412-523), S-V 69-123 
(8: 177-303), S-V 69-128 (2: 123-161, cleared and stained), S-V 69-152 (9: 
278-355), PCH 69-201 (1: 541), PCH 69-224 (1: 279), PCH 69=225 (1: 381), 
PCH 69-228 (1: 585), CCK 69-9 (1: 525), CCK 69-49 (4: 467-530), CCK 
69-53 (1: 339), CCK 69-110 (1: 343), CCK 69-113 (2: 370-535), CCK 69— 
130 (1: 555). SOUTH CHINA SEA: Hainan Island, USNM 94780 (1: 178). 
TAIWAN: USNM 192563 (1: 194). OKINAWA ISLAND: USNM 72093 
(2: 125-211). PHILIPPINES: Luzon, USNM 139573 (2: 33=38)pei49omo7 
(1: 47), 149800 (1:31), 168276 (1: 215), 168277 (12 220), 1OlSS5a( 2 aera 
191888 (11: 45-73), 191889 (11: 83-103), 191891 (6: 76-116), 191894 (4: 
44-100), 191896 (2: 200-213), 191907 (1: 76), 191913 (1: 54); Burias Island, 
USNM 194916 (1: 232); Busanga Island, USNM 191884 (3: 42-56); Lina- 
capan Island, USNM 191893 (2: 66-92); Pandanon Island, USNM 191910 
(2: 89-97); Mindoro, USNM 149799 (3: 66-79), 191902 (1: 73), 191908 
(1: 96); Samar, USNM 191859 (4: 190-196); Leyete, USNM 191886 (11: 
64-188); Palawan, USNM 191887 (19: 26-187), 191897 (4: 81-185), 191905 
(1: 39); Cuyo Island, USNM 191911 (2: 67-81). BORNEO: Sandakan Bay, 
USNM 191901 (3: 83-109). AUSTRALIA: Northern Territory, Bedwell Point, 
AMS IA. 7679-80 (2: 136-200); Gulf of Carpentaria, Sir Edward Pellew Group, 
AMS IA. 1488 (1: 129), TA. 2559 (1: 144); Queensland, AMS A. 12495 (1: 
141); Cape York, AMS TI. 9712-4 (3: 206-217); Barrier Reef, USNM 176914 (6: 
129-194); Townsville, AMS IA. 2324-5 (2: 150-164); Lindeman Island, AMS 
TA. 6288 (1: 290), TA: 6289-90 (2: 112=158), TA. 6647 (22 TIO=128) Rei 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 209 


7498-7501 (4: 51-75), IA. 7887 (1: 88); Hayman Island, AMS IA. 6126-7 
(4: 35-132); Burdekin River, I. 5314-5 (2: 175-187), A. 18302 (1: 157); New 
South Wales, Sydney, MKT AMS IB. 4232 (1: 290), USNM uncataloged sta- 
tion BBC 1464 (1: 295); Gafton, AMS I. 15594—001 (1: 65). NEW GUINEA: 
Aroma, AMS IA. 5738 (3: 33-69); Hula Village, AMS IB. 1706 (1: 160); 
Bat Island, Purdy Archipelago, AMS IB. 1523 (1: 82). NEW BRITAIN: GVF 
station HK-29 (1: 297), GVF station HK-130 (1: 418). SOLOMON ISLANDS: 
Bougainville, TABL uncataloged Te Vega Expedition, Cruise 6, station 247 (1: 
155); Ontonga Java Island, AMS IA. 3696 (1: 355). PALAU ISLAND: GVF- 
546 (1: 81), GVF-591 (1: 83), GVF-1971 (2: 189-205), GVF station 59—708 
(11: 373-442), GVF station 59-710 (2: 369-410), GVF station 59-724 (2: 365— 
379). MARIANA ISLAND: Saipan, USNM 154647 (1: 54). MARSHALL IS- 
LANDS: USNM 66022 (1: 40), 66024 (1: 37), 66025 (1: 30), 142040 (1: 580), 
142041 (2: 30), 142042 (2: 28-32), 163134 (1: 26), 165648 (2: 78-80), 179433 
(1: 63). GILBERT ISLANDS: USNM 66021 (1: 60); Onotoa, USNM 167428 
(2: 380-415); Arorae, AMS IB. 6618 (1: 25); Nauru, AMS TA. 6999 (1: 375). 
ELLICE ISLAND: AMS TIA. 5531 (1: 215); Funafuti, USNM 66020 (1: 96), 
AMS I. 3562 (1: 495). PHOENIX ISLANDS: Canton Island, USNM 115330 
(t= 456). SAMOA ISLANDS: Apia, USNM 52361 (3: 219-240). NEW 
HEBRIDES ISLANDS: Malehuka, AMS I. 11294 (1: 162). FIJI ISLANDS: 
Suva, USNM 66023 (2: 176-177). TONGA ISLANDS: Vavau, USNM 66019 
(1: 103); Tonga, TABL uncataloged, Te Vega Expedition, Cruise 8, station 
g06m(2-9215-227). SOCIETY ISLANDS: Tahiti, GVF-1155 (1: 324),GVF 
station 57-6 (1: 296). TUAMOTU ARCHIPELAGO: Rangiroa, USNM 66018 
(2: 84-135); Takaroa, GVF station 56—?? (1: 299); Raroia, GVF-87 (3: 502- 
555). MARQUESAS ISLANDS: Nukahiva, USNM 66016 (1: 416), 66017 
(3: 184-215); Hiva Oa, USNM 186329 (2: 33-38). LINE ISLANDS: Pal- 
myra Island, GVF station 51-41 (5: 350-419), GVF station 51-44 (4: 140- 
157); Christmas Island, USNM 19238 (3: 402-415). JOHNSTON ISLAND: 
USNM 26825 (1: 440). HAWAIIAN ISLANDS: Hawaii, USNM 78073 
(et 26-69) 982818 (1:2 279), 83429 (1: 227); Oahu, SU 3270 (52 172-220), 
figaie(o !03—=190), 53345 (1: 20), USNM 55082 (1: 357), 55371 (1: 141), 
88161 (1: 166), 88162 (3: 172-255), 126691 (1: 174), 151615 (3: 191-260). 


Scomberoides tol (Cuvier). 
(Figures 1d, 2d, 3d, 4d, 5—7, 14d, 19, 20b, 21c, 22c; tables 2-3.) 
Chorinemus tol Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 385 (type localities Pondichery ; 


Malabar coast; Amboine; Ile de Bourou). 
Scomberoides formosanus WAxktIya, 1924, p. 236, pl. 38, fig. 3 (type locality Kii, Formosa). 


NoMENCLATURE. The original description of Chorinemus tol is sufficiently 
diagnostic for positive identification (see also discussion under S. tala). Likewise 


210 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


the statement “scales linear, pointed at both ends” given in the description of 
S. formosanus could apply only to S. tol Cuvier. F. H. Berry has examined the 
130 mm. SL holotype (FMNH 59499), and made his data available to us. 

DEscripTION. Characters given in the generic description are not repeated 
here. Frequency distributions of selected meristic characters are given in table 
2. Dorsal-fin rays VI-VII + I, 19-21; anal-fin rays II + I, 18-20; pectoral- 
fin rays I, 15-18. Gillrakers 4-7 + 17-20 = 21-26. Upper jaw does not extend 
to posterior margin of eye (fig. 2d). Scales slender, needlelike (fig. 3d). Inner 
and outer row of dentary teeth subequal in adults (fig. 4d); dentary typically 
with one or two pairs of symphyseal canines in young; young with dentary teeth 
of outer row only slightly more numerous and closely spaced than inner row teeth. 

Proportional measurements apply only to specimens more than 150 mm. 
fork length (FL), and are in percent FL unless otherwise stated. Depth (origin 
Dp to Ay) 20.0-24.7; height dorsal-fin lobe 7.7-11.2; height anal-fin lobe 6.3— 
8.8; upper jaw 42.6-49.3 percent head length; snout 29.1-32.8 percent head 
length. 

PIGMENTATION. Sides of adults with 5 to 8 oval or vertically oblong blotches, 
the first 4 or 5 of which intersect lateral line. Distal half of dorsal-fin lobe abruptly 
and heavily pigmented; anal-fin lobe usually immaculate, white in life. In life, 
body white ventrally, bluish dorsally; lateral blotches black, faint or absent 
in young. 

DistrRIBuTION. Widely distributed throughout the Indo-Australian Archi- 
pelago and Indian Ocean. Although we have not examined specimens, the species 
has been reliably reported from the Red Sea. Scomberoides tol is apparently 
restricted to neritic waters, and does not occur east of the New Guinea-Solomon 
Islands region. 

Type MatertaL. MNHN A. 6605 (150, here designated lectotype of Chor- 
inemus tol) Malabar. Paralectotypes as follows: MNHN B. 2650 (2: 135-147, 
removed from A. 6605), B. 5542 (dried skin, not measured) Pondichery, A. 6585 
(1: 170) Bourou Island, A. 6620 (1: 119) Amboine. MNHN A. 6587 (2: 296— 
302, putative paralectotypes) Malabar (see discussion under S. tala). FMNH 
59499 (130 mm. SL, holotype of S. formosanus) Kii, Formosa. 

OTHER MATERIAL (142 specimens, 20-468 mm. FL from 66 collections). 
SOUTH AFRICA: Durban, TABL uncataloged FJS 69-1 (7: 224-267). MO- 
ZAMBIQUE: Ponta Mabonl, TABL uncataloged FJS 69-5 (1: 173); Polana, 
TABL uncataloged FJS 69-12 (1: 208); Mecaneta, TABL uncataloged FJS 
69-14 (3: 225-232). KENYA: Mombasa, TABL uncataloged Anton Bruun 
cruise 9, station FT-2 (2: 271-276). MADAGASCAR: USNM 171055 (1: 185), 
TABL uncataloged JR-27 (3: 171-173), JR-70 (1: 120), TABL uncataloged 
Anton Bruun cruise 7, Tulear Harbor, (1: 124). PERSIAN GULF: USNM 
147819 (1: 20), 148074 (1: 323). INDIA: Bombay, TABL uncataloged FHB 


VoL, XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 211 


66-1 (4: 37-55); Kerala State, Cochin, TABL uncataloged FHB 66-53 (1: 
127); Madras State, AMS B. 8045 (1: 171); Cape Comorin, TABL uncataloged 
FHB 66-46 (1: 222), FHB 66-49 (2: 264-330); Porto Nova, TABL un- 
cataloged FHB 66-17 (2: 282-284). CEYLON: FJS 69-14 (3: 225-232), 
TABL 107707 S-V 69-86 (4: 262-284), S-V 69-123 (8: 240-390), TABL 
107363 S-V 69-126 (8: 268-450), S-V 69-128 (6: 107—-131.5, 2 cleared and 
stained), PCH 69-180 (1: 326), PCH 69-185 (10: 102-107), PCH 69-202 
(2105-126), PCH 69-237 (1: 310), PCH 69-266 (4: 358-373), PCH 69-292 
(3: 146-154), CCK 69-9 (1: 340), CCK 69-43 (1: 181), CCK 69-73 (1: 395), 
CCK 69-91 (1: 242), CCK 69-94 (1: 468), CCK 69-113 (3: 410-426), CCK 
69-129 (8: 351-460). MALAYSIA: Penang, TABL uncataloged FJS 69-74 
m. (2: 209-219). GULF OF THAILAND: GVF station 13B-C (6: 209-246) 
GVF-1541 (7: 141-203), GVF-2546 (8: 269-320), GVF-2655 (2: 117-119). 
TAIWAN: USNM 76607 (8: 41-149), SU 7317 (1: 169), 20997 (2: 203-218). 
JAPAN: Kagoshima, SU 23774 (3: 86-117). PHILIPPINES: Luzon, USNM 
aoe oe lOS—224),, 168275. (1: .207),, 168281 (1: 372), 168282 (12-331), 
USNM uncataloged (out of USNM 191896) (1: 115), 191899 (1: 156), 191906 
(1: 77), 191909 (1: 89), 191912 (1: 89), AMST. 10539 (1: 215); Leyte, USNM 
149796 (1: 38); Cebu, USNM 191900 (2: 123-134); Panay, USNM 149794 
(1: 30), 191898 (1: 105); Mindanao, USNM 55995 (1: 244), 58011 (2: 143- 
144), 59004 (1: 149), 168283 (1: 348). JAVA: Batavia, USNM 726211 (2: 
22-040) 726012 (1: 171), 72613 (1: 145), 72614 (1: 130), 72615 (2: 162= 
208). AUSTRALIA: Western Australia, Onslow, WAM P. 15488—-90 (3: 110— 
174); Port Hedland, AMS IB. 1638 (1: 128); Gulf of Carpentaria, 16°53’S., 
139°21’E., AMS I. 15557-118 (5: 87-172); Queensland, Barrier Reef, USNM 
uncataloged (out of USNM 176914) (1: 171); Palmers Island, AMS I. 2962-3 
(2: 90-91) ; Hayman Island, AMS IA. 6373 (1: 221). NEW GUINEA: Sumarai 
District, AMS IA. 5740 (1: 235). SOLOMON ISLANDS: Bougainville, TABL 
uncataloged Te Vega Expedition, cruise 6, station 246 (2: 43-44); Malaita 
Island, AMS I. 15360—056 (1: 350). 


Scomberoides spinosus (Smirnov). 
(Figure 8.) 


Palaeoscomber spinosus SMIRNOV, 1936, p. 49-59, pl. 7, figs. 31-32 (type locality Zuramakent 
Horizon of the Upper Maikop deposits, Northeastern Caucasus). 


Danil’chenko (1960) has given a detailed redescription of Palaeoscomber 
spinosus and convincingly demonstrated that it is a species of carangid, although 
originally believed to represent a new genus and subfamily of Scombridae 
(Smirnov, 1936). In reassigning P. spinosus to Oligoplites, Danil’chenko em- 
phasized the peculiar needlelike scales which he regarded as a “characteristic 
sign” of the genus. He did not compare it with Scomberoides tol, apparently 


212 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


in (ite: | 


Ficure 8. Diagrammatic sketch of Palaeoscomber spinosus Smirnov (after Danil’chenko, 
1960). 


unaware that its scales are identical to those of Oligoplites. Although we have 
not examined specimens of P. spinosus, and therefore do not include a description, 
we believe it is a species of Scomberoides closely related to S. tol. The number 
of dorsal-fin rays (VI-VII + I, 20) and predorsal bones (3) reported for P. 
spinosus apply best to a species of Scomberoides. Likewise, the relatively short 
upper jaw (47 to 48 percent HL) and general configuration of the maxilla 
suggest S. tol rather than a species of Oligoplites (compare figs. 2d and 8). 

The four fossils upon which the description is based are from the Zuramakent 
Horizon of the Upper Maikop deposits (Lower Miocene) in the Northeastern 
Caucasus. According to Danil’chenko (1960), only 3 of 18 genera examined 
from this deposit do not represent recent genera. The recent species Scomber 
japonicus Houttuyn is also present. The characters of Oligoplites and its present 
distribution (western Atlantic and eastern Pacific) suggest that it evolved 
from a Scomberoides-like ancestor that reached the New World via the Pacific 
(see discussion under Relationships and Zoogeography Section). It seems more 
logical in view of the geographical location and recent nature of the Upper 
Maikop fauna that P. spinosus represents a genus present in the Indian Ocean 
rather than one that is restricted to the western Atlantic and eastern Pacific 
oceans. 

Two characters mentioned in the redescription of P. spinosus require com- 
ment. (1) The supramaxilla is said to be absent. The small supramaxilla of 
Scomberoides could easily be lost or overlooked in a fossil. (2) The vertebral 
count is given as 10 + 15. In his discussion of methods Danil’chenko (1960) 
stated that the vertebrae were counted as in recent fishes (the urostyle is treated 
as a separate vertebra), yet his diagrammatic drawing of P. spinosus (here re- 
produced as fig. 8) clearly shows 10 + 16 vertebrae. We believe the count of 
10 + 15 is an error. Berry (1968, p. 148) stated that the number of vertebrae 
is intraspecifically very constant in all Carangidae. One exception that he noted 
was one specimen of Oligoplites saurus inornatus Gill with 10 + 17 vertebrae; 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 213 


19 others had 10 + 16. We have made numerous vertebral counts of all species 
of Oligoplites and Scomberoides and except for the specimen mentioned above, 
all have 10 + 16 vertebrae. 

The available material of Scomberoides spinosus should be carefully com- 
pared with similar sized specimens of S. tol. We tentatively regard them as 
specifically distinct because several of the proportional measurements given 
for S. spinosus do not agree with our specimens of S. tol. 


Oligoplites Gill, 1863 


Oligoplites GILL, 1863, p. 166 (type species: Scomber saurus BLtocH and SCHNEIDER, 1801, 

by subsequent designation of JorDAN, 1917, p. 324). 

Leptoligoplites Fowurr, 1944, p. 226 (as a subgenus of Oligoplites; type-species: Oligoplites 
refulgens GILBERT and STARKs, 1904, by original designation). 

The carangid genus Oligoplites comprises five species of tropical and sub- 
tropical marine fishes restricted to the eastern Pacific and western Atlantic 
oceans. Only one species, O. saurus, occurs in both oceans. Parenthetically, 
it should be noted that in his excellent review of the zoogeographic relation- 
ships of tropical American marine shore fishes, Rosenblatt (1967, p. 590) has 
perpetuated a misconception by reporting Oligoplites from the eastern Atlantic. 
The genus is largely confined to inshore, neritic waters, and the young are 
sporadic invaders of coastal freshwater habitats (Gunter and Hall, 1963; Miller, 
1966; Gilbert and Kelso, 1971). Breder (1942) has made the interesting ob- 
servation that the young of Oligoplites saurus 27 to 34 mm. SL, which appear 
on the west coast of Florida during June and July, frequently drift passively 
at the surface head-down or twisted in a most unfishlike manner. He noted that 
their behavior and general appearance almost perfectly mimicked a floating 
dead leaf. The young of Scomberoides lysan have been observed exhibiting 
similar behavior (Major, 1973). The largest species of Oligoplites seldom, if 
ever, exceed 40 cm. fork length. In Central and South America they are com- 
monly sold in fish markets. F. H. Berry im McClane (1965, p. 477) has reported 
Oligoplites altus (as O. mundus) to be an exceptionally strong and stubborn 
fighter on light tackle. 

Oligoplites shows a striking external resemblance to the allopatric Indo- 
Pacific genus Scomberoides, and together they constitute the subfamily Scom- 
beroidinae (=Chorineminae) of recent authors. Starks (1911) gives a detailed 
osteological comparison of these two genera. The adults of Scomberoides have 
a series of prominent spots or bars on the sides that is absent in Oligoplites, 
although faint bars may occasionally be present in O. saurus. The genus was 
last reviewed by Schultz (1945). Several junior synonyms overlooked in that 
work are included in our synonymies. The species that we recognize may be 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


val a5 
02 iP 
S€ T 
£7 = 
i! 8 
€@ OT 
N v+9 
97 ei Coe — ENC 
Le bs 8ST 
cs a et? eal 8°97 
cy = wr ele Vive 
8¢ Gy L 91 
19 —= Ov he Lvl 
N TASS ANT x 
soutds 
[esiod ySAly 
(SIG SSR aa are a | 
CHS b @ SR io ea, | nn 
TAO ee Oe Ome cianos 2 OF 
Steam i Maes OF eC: 10 
COCA Ce aoe So 
Ou ee SO eee ok 
x INS GE IG We ON eI 


Ges 


Vans 


(,setoydots 193d +- sauoq [esiopoid) 


SIOYRY [[PD JaMo'T 


Gee te eS 
CO ee i 
OO ME NER Siem) ea ie 
eileen oe es Own aT oO 
ie SS SS 
SN a eB alo 
NE Ate The Sle Aa ian tat 
re (pa Wc ee ese 
oe ee le 
OO SSeS SSS SS OS 
= SS Oh ee 
a 
ye Oy A ah aH 


‘auids a[suis @ 1eeq saioydorsA19}d [esiop [[V 


sautds [esiop }si1f JO satoydorsA19}d pue souod [esiopaid Jo uoyKpes410) 


‘sataags SoydosyQ uz S4ajapapYyD I14St4aU {oO 


SIOyeY [ID JoddgQ 


T il SNIDUAOUL SNANDS 
I = SNANDS SNANDS 
a T suaspnfas 
ra == suayDs 
ae = Diamond 
= snyp 
9+? eat satoads 
i a SID UL OUTER STUDS 
Ee aes TP ce PR rm ge ee SNANDS SNANDS 
el am rae a suasynfas 
ae ae SS Oe ey te ee ne SUat]DS 
ee aoe) Regie go Gi SIRS GO lium tees og} eee oe oes pjamopwd 
Ta ae See kN OL O WMS 8h OO aa SnqyD 
Ge We Oc Oe we #4 OW Se we ei Git satads 
stoxea TTD [23O.L 
— ORC SSC a oh EL SSeS SS SNIDUAOUL SNANDS 
a Othe 2909 eee ETO eS ey oe SNANDS SNANDS 
=a GEO nO aie ad Oa ie cree a suasjnfad 
a DiS Sa ARE OCS aC aC) suayps 
a Loa BO AS eM i a Ge Amon OG, Pe Djamopwd 
I LS WS Oe eg See ee OTe mse Cae 3G SnYD 
8 x IN Oe ee Om ae Vomeitcor name satvads 


uoungiuysip Kuanbatg “4 ATAVL, 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 215 


TABLE 5. Comparison of upper jaw length (expressed as percent HL) and body depth 
(expressed as percent FL) in Oligoplites species. 


PCO. Upper Jaw Length Depth 
Species Range FL N Range x N Range x 
altus 35-149 13 59-66 63.4 10 27-32 29.8 
palometa 92-147 12 58-63 59.7 12 24-31 27.3 
saliens 88-146 7 57-67 62.3 8 26-29 27.0 
refulgens 44-148 35 41-46 43.6 36 19-29) @ e199 
Saurus saurus 31-144 11 52-57 54.7 10 23-26 23.9 
saurus inornatus 53-132 20 52-57 55.3 20 23-25 24.0 
$5450 mn: Upper Jaw Length Depth 
Species Range FL N Range X N Range x 
altus 154-379 65 58-70 64.3 47 27-38 32.0 
palometa 160-392 26 59-64 61.6 26 26-34 29.2 
saliens 165-390 34 62-68 65.3 33 27-31 28.8 
refulgens 150-230 22 42-46 43.5 22 19-22 20.0 
Saurus saurus 165-285 26 52-57 54.3 26 24-27 DSP) 
saurus inornatus 200-257 7 52-57 54.6 il 25-28 26.8 


identified by reference to the key and tables 4-5. We have not included seg- 
mented dorsal- and anal-fin ray counts because, as in Scomberoides, they are 
not useful in defining species. 

NOMENCLATURE. Schultz (1945) considered O. inornatus Gill the “genotype” 
of Oligoplites, however, no type-species designation was given in the original 
description. We believe that the action of Jordan (1917, p. 324) qualifies Scom- 
ber saurus Bloch and Schneider, 1801, as the type-species in accordance with 
provision (iv) of Article 68a of the International Code of Zoological Nomen- 
clature (1964). 

We concur with Schultz (1945, p. 330) that recognition of the subgenus 
Leptoligoplites on the basis of a few more gill rakers and elongate body is un- 
justified. Differences in dentition would be a much better basis upon which 
to establish subgenera if such were needed. 

DEscrRIPTION. Body moderately to strongly compressed. Adipose eye- 
lids moderately to poorly developed. Body, except head, covered with needle- 
like embedded scales. Lateral-line scales not developed into scutes. Lateral line 
without side branches, straight except for slight curve over pectoral fin. Anterior 
rim of shoulder girdle smooth, without fleshy papillae or deep groove near 
isthmus. Premaxillae not protractile, connected anteriorly to snout at midline 
by a wide fleshy bridge. Swimbladder strongly bifid posteriorly, length of bi- 


216 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


furcated portion of swimbladder equal to or greater than undivided part. Pos- 
terior dorsal- and anal-fin rays consisting of semidetached finlets, distal fourth 
to half of ray not connected by interradial membrane (unattached portion of 
rays increasing with growth); ultimate and penultimate rays more closely 
spaced than adjoining rays, fully connected by interradial membrane; none of 
dorsal- or anal-fin rays produced into long filaments. Pelvic fins relatively short, 
depressible into shallow abdominal grooves. Pectoral fins short, not falcate, 
57 to 80 percent head length in adults. Upper jaw extends posteriorly from 
middle of eye to well behind orbital rim, 42 to 70 percent head length in adults. 

Predorsal bones 4 to 6, rarely 4; dorsal-fin rays IV-VI (rarely VI) + I, 
18 to 21; total dorsal-fin rays 23 to 27. Anal-fin rays II + I, 19 to 21. Pectoral- 
fin rays I, 15 to 17. Pelvic-fin rays I, 5. Vertebrae 10 + 16 to 17 (rarely 17) 
= 26; epipleural ribs 8-10. Branchiostegal rays 3 + 4 or 2% + 4% (epihyal 
+ ceratohyal). Upper gillrakers 2 to 8; lower gillrakers 8 to 22; total gillrakers 
11 to 29. 

Fronto-supraoccipital crest low; temporal crest poorly developed, not ex- 
tending forward to posterior rim of orbit and not reaching edge of cranium; 
preorbital region short. Epiotics broadly united along midline of cranium in- 
ternally. Zygapophyses of exoccipital widely separated beneath foramen mag- 
num. Parasphenoid not expanded into a broad, flattened plate posteriorly. 
Myodome with broad, posterior opening. Basioccipital without a pair of lateral 
processes on ventral surface. Ascending process of premaxilla short and tri- 
angular; maxilla long and slender, rather closely attached to premaxilla. Pre- 
maxillary spur absent. Supramaxilla absent. Interosseous space between dorsal 
arm of dentary and upper margin of articular minute or absent. Well developed 
teeth on dentary, premaxilla, palatines, and vomer; two distinct rows of dentary 
teeth (see discussion under Relationships and Zoogeography Section); sym- 
physeal premaxillary and dentary teeth of juveniles not robust or caniniform. 
Mesopterygoids edentate. Pharyngeals not noticeably enlarged, covered with 
sharp, pointed teeth. 

Suborbital shelf absent; lower and posterior suborbitals expanded poste- 
riorly, especially in large specimens, thus covering a large portion of cheek. 
Basibranchials 1-3 usually each with a pair of large tooth plates. Lower limb 
of posttemporal not noticeably short or thickened. Postcoracoid process absent. 
Interpelvic keel well developed; postpelvic process of each side coalesced entire 
length, not forming an apical fork. Inferior vertebral foramina absent. First 
anal pterygiophore and haemal spine of first caudal vertebra firmly attached to 
form a strong strut. Anal pterygiophore expanded anterolaterally to form roof 
over first two anal spines; first two anal spines articulated proximally with each 
other; second anal spine asymmetrical, with deep groove on one side of anterior 
face. Caudal skeleton with 2 epurals and 2 pairs of uroneurals. 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 217 


Key To Spectres oF Oligoplites 


la. Upper jaw 41 to 46 percent HL; body depth 18 to 22 (mean 20.0) percent FL; head 
length usually equal to or greater than body depth; specimen figure 10a 
Pan Sra Nn eles a O. refulgens (Pacific) 
1b. Upper jaw 52 to 70 percent HL; body depth 23 to 38 percent FL; head length less 
(Haver |oyaya hy “YoU Ey Oy 1 See se ao ee ede Do oe ne Roh Oe a YE al oe 2 
2a. Ventral profile of dentary strongly convex (fig. 9c); premaxillary teeth in a single row, 
somewhat irregular in young; gillrakers of lower limb of first gill arch 17 to 20 (mean 
18.8) ; first dorsal spines consistently 4; specimen figure 9c O. saliens (Atlantic) 
2b. Ventral profile of dentary moderately convex; premaxilla with 2 distinct rows of teeth 
or a band of villiform teeth; gillrakers on lower limb of first gill arch 8 to 18 (11 to 
1S tin A eiM(e Kpoyeees)) 8 aanaste GloveseNl Goynavess 2 (0) @ 3 
3a. Upper jaw 52 to 57 (mean 54.7) percent HL; body depth 23 to 28 percent FL; gillrakers 
on lower limb of first gill arch 13 to 18; premaxillary teeth essentially in 2 distinct rows, 
an additional row of minute teeth may occur anteriorly; first dorsal spines typically 
SeEspecimen, tieures 9aand, (Ob) 22 O. saurus (Atlantic and Pacific) 
3b. Upper jaw 58 to 70 percent HL; body depth 24 to 38 percent FL; gillrakers on lower 
limb of first gill arch 8 to 14; premaxilla with a band of villiform teeth, wide anteriorly; 
HITS PEG OLSAIESDINCSRAmONG OM eee tL a a oe ee ee 4 
4a. Top of head with numerous sensory pores, which are connected by network of tubes 
wisible) beneath skin specimen) figures lOc, d@ 2 O. altus (Pacific) 
4b. Sensory pores on top of head sparse, never aS numerous as in specimens of O. altus; 
SHECIMENMMC MTCRG Due ee = mes ee ee O. palometa (Atlantic) 


Oligoplites refulgens Gilbert and Starks. 
(Figures 10a, 11, 19; tables 4-5.) 


Oligoplites refulgens GILBERT and STARKS, 1904, p. 73, pl. 11, fig. 19 (type locality Panama 
Bay). 


This Eastern Pacific species is easily distinguished from its congeners by 
its short upper jaw and slender body (see table 5). From those species with 
which it occurs sympatrically, it is also distinguished by its higher number of 
gill rakers. On the basis of its premaxillary dentition, relationship of predorsal 
bones to first dorsal pterygiophores, and upper jaw development, it appears to 
be most closely related to O. saurus. 

Oligoplites refulgens is the smallest species of the genus, rarely exceeding 
250 mm. FL. It occurs in the Gulf of California north at least to Kino Bay, 
Sonora, Mexico and south to the Gulf of Guayaquil, Ecuador. 

MatTERIAL (61 specimens, 38-230 mm. FL, from 14 collections). GULF OF 
CALIFORNIA: TABL 103470 (1: 148.5), 103475 (2: 113-131, cleared and 
stained), 103477 (2: 162), SIO 59-245 (1: 170). GULF OF PANAMA: TABL 
103473 (1: 117), 103474 (2: 186-189), 103476 (4: 116-132), 107711 (4: 164— 
175), USNM 81986 (10 of 36: 38-82). COLOMBIA: TABL 103472 (6: 89- 
OA 107708 (1-230). ECUADOR: TABL 103471 (12209), TABLE 103478 
Cismotss 15-157): PERU: Zorritos, TABL 107710 @4=z 150=196); 


218 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 9. Western Atlantic Oligoplites: a, O. s. sauwrus, TABL 101582, 225 mm. FL; 
b, O. palometa, USNM 121804, 245 mm. FL; c, O. saliens, TABL 101351, 204 mm. FL. 


Oligoplites saliens (Bloch). 
(Figures 9c, 11, 14f, 19, 24c; tables 4-5.) 
Scomber saliens BirocH, 1793, p. 49, pl. 335 (type locality Antilles). 


?Scomber calcar BLocH, 1793, p. 55, pl. 336, fig. 2 (type locality Accra, coast of Guinée). 
Scomberoides saltator LACEPEDE, 1802, p. 50 (based on unpublished manuscript of Plumier). 


Schultz (1945) did not include Scomber calcar in his synonymy of O. saliens. 
Bloch’s illustration shows what appears to be a species of Oligoplites, with a 
relatively deep body and 3 first dorsal spines. Since Bloch’s description was 
based on a small specimen, Regan (1903, p. 349) is probably correct in stating 
that it is ‘“‘without much doubt, based on a young example of Scomberoides 
| =Oligoplites| saliens, B\.”. The eastern Atlantic type locality would seem to 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 219 


See, 


Ficure 10. Eastern Pacific Oligoplites: a, O. refulgens, SIO 59-245, 170 mm. FL; 
b, O. saurus inornatus, TABL 103480, 200 mm. FL; c, O. altus UCLA w58-304, 195 mm. FL; 
d, O. altus (‘mundus’ form), UCLA w58-304, 180 mm. FL. 


220 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


ALTUS 
PALOMETA 


SAURUS 


o 
e 
SALIENS wx 
° 
REFULGENS #8 


UPPER JAW LENGTH (MM) 


19) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 


HEAD LENGTH (MM) 


Ficure 11. Relationship of upper jaw length to head length in Oligoplites species. Dashed 
lines represent upper jaw length as percent head length. 


exclude S. calcar representing a species of Oligoplites, but the type locality is 
possibly in error. C. L. Smith has documented a number of such errors (Smith, 
1971, pp. 165 and 208) involving other species described by Bloch. 

The most diagnostic character of O. saliens is the strongly convex ventral 
profile of its massive lower jaw (see fig. 9c). It is the most specialized species 
of Oligoplites and does not appear to be closely related to any other species. 
It differs in having a 5 + 4 arrangement of predorsal bones and first dorsal 
pterygiophores (see table 4), a single row of enlarged premaxillary teeth, and 
a relatively constant number of outer dentary teeth (see fig. 19) that do not 
exhibit any recognizable ontogenetic changes. Oligoplites saliens can also be 
distinguished from the other two Atlantic species of Oligoplites by its higher 
number of gillrakers on the lower limb of the first gill arch. 

Oligoplites saliens is a large species, attaining at least 390 mm. FL. In the 
western Atlantic it ranges north at least to Cartasca Lagoon, Honduras, and south 
to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 

MATERIAL (42 specimens, 88-390 mm. FL, from 25 collections). HON- 
DURAS: Caratasca Lagoon, TABL 101351 (11: 185-219), 101353 (2: 183.5— 
207), 104795 (5: 195-208). COLOMBIA: UMML 27265 (1: 122). GULF 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 221 


OF VENEZUELA: TABL 103213 (1: 390), USNM 123073 (1: 88), 123075 
(1: 94). TRINIDAD: TABL 104796 (1: 203). GUYANA: TABL 104330 (1: 
meme 04378 (1: 235), 107716 (1: 165), 107717 (1: 177). SURINAM: USNM 
uncataloged R/V Oregon station 4175 (1: 169). BRAZIL: Rio Para, SU 53055 
(i201), 53062 (1: 249), 53063 (1: 315), 53064 (1: 165); Vitoria, SU 66973 
(3[2 cleared and stained]: 95-133), 66975 (1: 146), 66976 (1: 145); Rio de 
Janeiro, SU 53056 (1: 215), 53057 (1: 270), USNM 76330 (1: 194), 100824 
(#7503), 100825 (1: 295). 


Oligoplites saurus (Bloch and Schneider). 

(Figures 9a, 10b, 11, 14e, 18, 19, 20c, 21d, 22d; tables 4-5.) 

Scomber saurus BLocu and SCHNEIDER, 1801, p. 32 (type locality Jamaica). 

?Lichia quiebra Quoy and GAIMARD, 1824, p. 365 (type locality Brazil). 

Chorinemus saltans Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 393 (289) (type locality 
Martinique). 

Chorinemus lanceolatus Girard, 1858, p. 168 (type locality Joseph’s Island, Texas). 

Chorinemus occidentalis GUNTHER, 1860, p. 475 (type localities Jamaica; San Domingo; 
Trinidad; Puerto Cabello; Bahia). 

Oligoplites inornatus GILL, 1863, p. 166 (type locality west coast of Panama). 

Oligoplites rathbuni MiranpA-RiBeEtRO, 1915, p. 8 (type locality Bahia Fish Market, Brazil). 


Schultz (1945) apparently overlooked the descriptions of Chorinemus saltans 
and C. lanceolatus. The descriptions of both species and their type localities are 
sufficient to identify them positively as synonyms of O. saurus. We have 
examined the 102 mm. holotype (USNM 710) of C. lanceolatus. 

Centronotus argenteus Lacépéde (1802, p. 316) was questionably included 
by Schultz in the svnonymy of O. s. saurus. The name, however, does not appear 
to be available nomenclaturally, and we regard it as a nomen nudum. No de- 
scription was given and species belonging to two different genera were listed as 
synonyms. 

Oligoplites inornatus was not compared with O. saurus in the original de- 
scription. Despite the fact that these two nominal species were described from 
different oceans, recent workers have regarded them as only subspecifically 
distinct at best. The only characters that appear to distinguish them are a 
slightly higher number of gillrakers and a few more premaxillary teeth ante- 
tiorly in Pacific specimens. Certainly the slight differences shown between these 
two nominal species are not of sufficient magnitude to justify specific separation. 
However, until large series of specimens from throughout the range of both 
populations are compared, we believe it is best to maintain them as subspe- 
cifically distinct. 

The best characters by which to distinguish O. saurus are given in the key 
to Oligoplites species. Berry in McClane (1965, p. 476) reported that the two 
detached anal-fin spines of O. s. inornatus apparently are connected with toxic 


bo 
bo 
bo 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


glands. In south Florida O. saurus is commonly referred to by commercial fisher- 
men as stinging jack. We know of no report of ‘stinging’ characteristics in 
any other species of Oligoplites. 

Although O. saurus attains at least 285 mm. FL, it seldom exceeds 250 mm. 
In the western Atlantic it occurs as far north as the Gulf of Main (Bigelow 
and Schroeder, 1953, p. 381) and south at least to Recife, Brazil. It is the only 
species of Oligo plites that occurs along the coast of the United States and through- 
out most of the Caribbean. It has not, however, been reported from the Bahama 
Islands, perhaps because of the absence of suitable estuarine habitats. In the 
eastern Pacific O. saurus inornatus occurs in the Gulf of California at least to 
Concepcion Bay, along the outer coast of Baja California to Magdalena Bay, 
and south to Esmeraldas, Ecuador, and the Galapagos Islands. 

MATERIAL. The specimens of O. saurus which we have studied are listed 
under the two subspecies as follows: 

Oligoplites saurus saurus (71 specimens, 31-285 mm. FL, from 30 col- 
lections). GEORGIA: TABL 102643 (1: 191), 103197 (1: 23G)R@77en 
(2: 92-98, cleared and stained). FLORIDA: UMML 39 (1: 67), 3144 (5: 
51-93), 4273 (2: 47-139), 4436 (2: 90-92), 5114 (1: 116), 5628 (1: 60), 
5975 (1: 73), 9597 (2: 165-185), 13123 (1: 253), 29468 (4: 211-250), BABE 
102682 (1: 188), 104730 (9: 101-128), 105386 (3: 196-285), TABL uncata- 
loged station 67-258 (4: 126-168), station 67-280 (3: 131-152). MISSIS- 
SIPPI: TABL 102644 (1: 202). LOUISIANA: TABL) 1026835 G=saoie 
TEXAS: USNM 710 (102, holotype of Chorinemus lanceolatus). JAMAICA: 
TABL 101582 (4: 208-225). MARTINIQUE: TABL 103469 (1: 206), 
105791 (3: 130-179). GRENADINE ISLAND: TABL 104420 (2: 84-98). 
TRINIDAD: TABL 103466 (4: 31-144), 104372 (1: 259), 105364 (4: 230- 
269). VENEZUELA: Carupano, TABL 103207 (3: 199-280). BRAZIL: 
Recife, SU 51844 (2: 192-196). 

Oligoplites saurus inornatus (27 specimens, 53-257 mm. FL from 12 col- 
lections). GULF OF CALIFORNIA: TABL 103481 (6: 112-132), 103483 
(7: 53-93), SIO 60-298 (2: 110-125), USNM 101037 (1: 246). BAJA CAL- 
IFORNIA: Magdalena Bay, SIO-304 (3: 104-109). MEXICO: Banderas 
Bay, TABL 103479 (1: 220), 103482 (1: 104). COSTA RICA: SIO H52-93 
(2: 253-257). PANAMA: USNM 30959 (248, holotype of Oligoplites in- 
ornatus), TABL 105800 (1: 127). ECUADOR: Esmeraldas, TABL 103480 
(1: 200). GALAPAGOS ISLANDS: AMNH 8308 (2: 71-75). 


Oligoplites altus (Giinther). 
(Figures 10c, 10d, 11; tables 4-6.) 


?Lichia albacora GUICHENOT, 1848, p. 231 (type locality Valparaiso, Chile). 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 223 


Chorinemus altus GUNTHER, 1868, p. 433, unnumbered fig. (of head) (type locality west 
coast of Panama). 

Oligoplites mundus JorDAN and Starks in Jordan and Evermann, 1898, p. 2844 (type locality 
San Juan Lagoon, Mexico, mouth of Ahome River). 


In the original description Lichia albacora was compared only with Scomber 
calcar Bloch, a probable synonym of Oligoplites saliens. The description, al- 
though poor, applies best to a species of Oligoplites. The statement “each jaw 
has two rows of velvet teeth” is a good description of the teeth in a young 
individual of Oligoplites, but the single type was reported to be 45 inches total 
length. However the following statements, also given in the description, suggest 
that the type was small, probably only 4.5 inches TL: “The fishermen of Val- 
paraiso catch it on rare occasions. It seems that it is usually much larger than 
the one we have observed.” Lichia albacora may have been based on a young 
specimen of O. altus. This species is known to occur farther south than the 
other eastern Pacific members of Oligoplites, and the first dorsal spine count 
of three may have been the result of overlooking the small, frequently depressed, 
first spine. The type of Lichia albacora could not be located in the Museum 
National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, where, if extant, it should be deposited. 

Schultz (1945) regarded Oligoplites mundus as a distinct species, distin- 
guished from O. altus on the basis of a slightly longer upper jaw. Both species 
were otherwise very similar, sharing a number of characters not found in other 
Pacific species of Oligoplites. Schultz had only two examples which he con- 
sidered conspecific with O. altus, the same two specimens on which the account 
of the species in Meek and Hildebrand (1925, p. 388) is based. We have ex- 
amined 80 specimens, including the type of O. mundus and Schultz’s two examples 
of O. altus. However, more specimens are needed before it will be possible 
to resolve the systematic status of the two forms. Because we are unable to 
confidently assign a large number of specimens to one or the other form, we 
tentatively regard them as conspecific. 

The species, as here defined, exhibits a more extreme range of variation in 
several characters than is found in other species of Oligoplites. Particularly 
striking is the range of variation in upper jaw length (see table 6). This vari- 
ation is not due to sexual dimorphism; nor is it due to population differences, 
because specimens of approximately the same size, from the same station, exhibit 
the extremes in variation for several characters. Individuals with long jaws 
generally have deeper bodies, higher fin lobes, smaller eyes, fewer gillrakers, 
dorsal spines, and segmented dorsal- and anal-fin rays than do their short jawed 
counterparts. When any of these characters are plotted against upper jaw length 
(expressed as percent head length) an obvious negative or positive correlation 
with jaw length is apparent. It is however, impossible to separate specimens 
into two groups on the basis of these characters. Both forms are distinguished 
from their congeners in having the dorsum of the head covered with numerous 


224 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


TaBLe 6. Comparison of fork length and upper jaw length (as percent head length) 
in Oligoplites altus. 


7 Length 
Fork Length hel yee ae 


Class (mm.) 58-59.9  60-61.9 62-63.9 64-65.9 66-67.9 68-70 N 
100-150 at 1 3 6 =e = 10 
151-199 3 5 6 4 1 3 22 
200-249 2 1 3 2 3 2 13 
250-299 ae 1 5 3 2 3 14 
300-349 = 2 = 4 1 2 9 
350-380 = _ 1 3 1 1 6 


sensory pores, which are connected by a network of tubes visible beneath the 
skin. They may also be distinguished from those species with which they occur 
sympatrically by their premaxillary dentition, lower number of gillrakers, and 
longer upper jaw (see table 5). An explanation for the wide range of variation 
in upper jaw length and strong correlation with several other characters in O. 
altus is a subject that requires investigation by future workers. One possibility 
that should be considered is that this variation is due to introgressive hybrid- 
ization (see Anderson, 1949). In many of its characters the short jawed form 
of O. altus is intermediate between the long jawed form and O. saurus inornatus. 

Oligoplites altus reaches at least 379 mm. FL and attains the greatest body 
depth of any Oligoplites species. On the basis of our material, O. altus occurs 
in the northern Gulf of California, north at least to Punta Estrella, along the 
outer coast of Baja California to Magdalena Bay, and south to the Gulf of 
Guayaquil. It has also been reported by several authors from Peru, apparently 
on the authority of Tortonese (1939, p. 338), who listed a single specimen from 
Callao. 

MATERIAL (81 specimens, 27-379 mm. FL, from 36 collections). BAJA CAL- 
IFORNIA: Magdalena Bay, TABL 105541 (2: 354-372), 105544 (1: 348), 
SIO 62-718 (2: 259-299), 62-725 (7 of 11: 281-300). GULF OF CAL- 
IFORNIA: TABL uncataloged, Almejas Bay (2: 236-317), TABL 105534 (1: 
315), 105542 (1: 355), 105543 (2: 332-354), SIO 61-180 (8: 171-199), 61— 
182 (1: 257), UCLA W50-46 (2: 195-209), W52-132 (1: 168), W58-48 (2: 
147-149). MEXICO: San Juan Lagoon, USNM 48876 (231, holotype of O. 
mundus); Tepic, USNM 130860 (2: 122-137.5); Banderas Bay, TABL un- 
cataloged (2: 112-114). EL SALVADOR: USNM 87338 (U3572);eAbe 
104616 (1: 231). COSTA RICA: Gulf of Nicoya, TABL uncataloged (2: 
292-314), UCLA W54-12 (1: 130), W54-171 (1: 138.5). GULF OF PAN- 
AMA: SIO 58-402 (3: 250-310), UCLA W58-303 (2: 189-212), W58-304 
(8: 162-202), W58-305 (3: 137-155), USNM 80063 (1: 198), 82043 (1:215), 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 225 


128698 (3: 27-59), 128699 (1: 83); San Miguel, TABL uncataloged (3: 178- 
298). COLOMBIA: Buenaventura Market, TABL uncataloged (1: 241). 
BeRADOR: Esmeraldas, TABL 105528 (1: 207), 105529 (2: 195-201), 
TABL uncataloged (1: 220); Gulf of Guayaquil, TABL 107260 (2: 379), 
TABL uncataloged (6: 222-337). 


Oligoplites palometa (Cuvier). 

(Figures 9b, 11, 19; tables 4-5.) 

Chorinemus palometa Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 392 (288) (type locality 
Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela). 


?Chorinemus guaribira Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831, p. 393 (289) (type locality 
Brazil) . 


This western Atlantic species is very closely related to the eastern Pacific 
O. altus. Both species are separable from other forms of Oligoplites on the 
basis of their premaxillary dentition, which consists of a band of villiform teeth 
along entire length of premaxilla, wide anteriorly, becoming narrow posteriorly. 
Superficially they are very similar, although O. altus is generally a more deep- 
bodied fish. The only character that will separate these two species is the 
relative development of cephalic pores. Reduction of cephalic pores in O. pal- 
ometa suggest that it is the more specialized of the two species. 

Oligoplites palometa is a large species, attaining at least 392 mm. FL. It 
occurs from Lake Yzabal, Guatemala, south to Sao Paulo, Brazil. 

MATERIAL (42 specimens, 84-392 mm. FL, from 22 collections). GUATE- 
MALA: Lake Yzabal, USNM 13480 (1: 139). NICARAGUA: AMNH 
19027 (18: 84.5-160), USNM 44205 (3: 329-268), 45373 (1: 348), 45374 
(1: 317), 45375 (1: 304). GULF OF VENEZUELA: USNM 121803 (1: 344), 
121804 (1: 245), 121805 (2: 241-303), 121806 (1: 133.5). BRAZIL: USNM 
100817 (1: 342), 100847 (1: 392), 100851 (1: 297), SU 66978 (1: 141); Rio 
Para, SU 53059 (1: 248), 53060 (1: 219), 53061 (1: 222); Salvador (Bahia), SU 
j20o4( 125535): Recife, SU 53058 (1: 305), 67028 (1: 334); Sao Paulo, SU 
67007 (1: 171), 67014 (1: 228). 


Parona Berg, 1895 


Paropsis JENYNS, 1842, p. 65 (type-species: Paropsis signatus Jenyns, 1842, by monotypy). 
Parona BeErc, 1895, p. 39 (substitute name for Paropsis Jenyns, 1842, preoccupied, and, 
therefore, taking the same type species: Paropsis signatus Jenyns, 1842). 


This monotypic genus is restricted to subtropical and temperate waters of 
the south Atlantic from Brazil to southern Argentina. Almost nothing has been 
published on the biology of Parona, although the genus is reported (Evermann 
and Kendall, 1906, p. 99) to be very common along the whole coast of Argentina, 
and caught at Montevideo, Uruguay, during certain times of the year in enormous 


226 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


quantities. The unusual lateral line with 5—9 dorsal branches, the deep, com- 
pressed body, and the lack of pelvic fins suggest that their ecology differs from 
that of most carangids. Norman (1937, p. 59) reported six specimens, 465-— 
600 mm. SL, caught by otter trawl in 51-56 m.; these specimens are the largest 
examples known to us. Nothing on the osteology of Parona has been published 
previously. 

DEscRIPTION. Body strongly compressed. Adipose eyelids poorly developed. 
Body, except head, covered with oval-shaped scales. Lateral-line scales not 
developed into scutes. Lateral line with 5—9 dorsal branches; horizontal portion 
of lateral line straight except for moderate curve over pectoral fin. Anterior 
rim of shoulder girdle smooth, without fleshy papillae or deep groove near 
isthmus. Premaxillae not protractile, connected anteriorly to snout at midline 
by a narrow fleshy bridge. Swimbladder simple, not bifid posteriorly. Posterior 
dorsal- and anal-fin rays not consisting of semidetached finlets; ultimate and 
penultimate rays no more closely spaced than adjoining rays; none of dorsal- 
or anal-fin rays produced into long filaments. Pelvic fins absent. Pectoral fins 
short, not falcate, 60.0 to 67.0 percent head length in adults. Upper jaw ex- 
tending posteriorly from slightly behind (young) to well behind (adult) orbital 
rim, 52.6 to 57.0 percent head length in adults. Depth (origin Dz to Ag) 37.4 
to 44.0 percent fork length in adults. 

Predorsal bones 4; dorsal-fin rays VI-VII (rarely VII) + I, 32 to 37; 
total dorsal-fin rays 39-44, Anal-fin rays II + I, 34 to 38. Pectoral-fin rays 
I, 19-21. Pelvic fins absent. Vertebrae 10 + 17 = 27, epipleural ribs 10 or 11. 
Branchiostegal rays 3 + 6 (epihyal + ceratohyal). Upper gillrakers 4 to 8; 
lower gillrakers 15 to 17; total gillrakers 20 to 24. 

Fronto-supraoccipital crest high; temporal crest extending nearly straight 
forward to front of the frontal; preorbital region short. Epiotics broadly united 
along midline of cranium internally. Zygapophyses of exoccipital united beneath 
foramen magnum. Parasphenoid not expanded into a broad, flattened plate 
posteriorly. Myodome with broad, posterior opening. Basioccipital without 
a pair of lateral processes on ventral surface. Ascending process of premaxilla 
short and triangular; maxilla and premaxilla relatively broad, not closely 
attached to premaxilla. Premaxillary spur very reduced, consisting of only a 
slight bulge. Large supramaxilla present. Interosseous space between dorsal 
arm of dentary and upper margin of articular well developed. Well developed 
teeth on dentary, premaxilla, palatines, and vomer; dentary and premaxillary 
teeth conical, arranged in a narrow band anteriorly becoming a single row poste- 
riorly; symphyseal premaxillary and dentary teeth of juveniles slender and 
caniniform. Mesopterygoids partially covered by a patch of free-floating gran- 
ular teeth. Pharyngeals not noticeably enlarged, covered with sharp, pointed 


teeth. 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 227 


Suborbital shelf present; lower and posterior suborbitals not expanded 
posteriorly to cover a large portion of cheek. Basibranchials 1-3, each with a 
large, median tooth plate. Lower limb of posttemporal not noticeably short 
or thickened. Postcoracoid process well developed. Inter-pelvic keel absent; 
postpelvic process of each side coalesced entire length, not forming an apical 
fork. Inferior vertebral foramina absent. First anal pterygiophore and haemal 
spine of first caudal vertebra firmly attached to form a strong strut. Anal 
pterygiophore not expanded anterolaterally to form roof over first two anal 
spines; first two anal spines not articulated proximally with each other; second 
anal spine symmetrical, without deep groove on one side of anterior face. Caudal 
skeleton with 2 epurals and 2 pairs of uroneurals. 


Parona signata (Jenyns). 
(Figures 12, 14a, 15a, 16a, 20a, 21a, 22a, 23a, 24d, 25a.) 


Paropsis signatus JENYNS, 1842, p. 66, pl. 13 (type locality Bahia Blanca, coast of northern 
Patagonia). 


DEscriPTION. Since Parona is monotypic, refer to generic description. 

PIGMENTATION. Most specimens of Parona signata have a conspicuous 
elongate, horizontal, black blotch on sides beneath pectoral fins, which may also 
extend onto base of ventral third of pectoral fin. In a few specimens this blotch 
is short and almost completely hidden by the pectoral fin; it is completely 
absent in 7 small specimens (TABL 102908) from Argentina. A small round 
spot at the dorsal origin of the pectoral fin is present on all specimens. Also 
present on all specimens is a dusky blotch on dorsal! third of opercle, heavily 
pigmented areas, slightly larger than pupil, on either side of snout that are 
separated at dorsum by paler region, and concentration of pigment at tip of 
lower jaws. Jenyns (1842, p. 67) reported the life colors as “uniform bright 


228 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


silvery, the ridge of back bluish: a patch of black on the gill-cover, and another 
under the pectoral fin.” 

DISTRIBUTION. Southern Brazil to southern Argentina. Apparently re- 
stricted to western Atlantic Ocean. Reported from Chile “‘Blacino del Rio Santa 
Cruz” (Fowler, 1945, p. 70), but this record needs verification. The same locality 
is generally listed as being in Argentina. 

MATERIAL (20 specimens, 75-368 mm. FL, from 11 collections). BRAZIL: 
TABL 107713 (2: 358-368); Florianopolis, SU 53052 (1: 264), 53053 (1: 
360); Port of Rio Grande do Sul, SU 51868 (2: 171-192). URUGUAY: USNM 
87730 (2: 312-335), 86715 (1: 148 mm. SL, cleared and stained) ; Montevideo, 
USNM 77375 (1: 135), 86689 (1: 298). ARGENTINA: USNM 53441 (1: 
289); Buenos Aires, TABL 101156 (1: 270); Mar del Plata, TABL 102908 
(7: 75-84, 3 cleared and stained). 


Hypacanthus Rafinesque, 1810 


Hypacanthus RA¥FINESQUE, 1810, p. 43 (type-species: Centronotus vadigo Lacépede, 1802 = 
Scomber amia Linnaeus, 1758, by present designation). 

Lichia Cuvier, 1817, p. 321 (type-species: Scomber amia Linnaeus, 1758, by monotypy). 

Porthmeus VALENCIENNES im Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1833, p. 255 (190) (type-species: 
Porthmeus argenteus Valenciennes, 1833, by original designation). 


This monotypic genus is restricted to subtropical and temperate waters of 
the Mediterranean, eastern Atlantic, and southern Indian Ocean. The habitat 
of Hypacanthus is littoral (Poll, 1954, p. 160) “. . . judging by the origins of 
specimens—collections and total absence of this species from catches of trawls.” 
Along the west African Gold Coast small specimens of Hypacanthus are caught 
in seines, but uncommonly, and they are taken with lines from January to April 
(Norman and Irvine, 1947, p. 144). Smith (1949, p. 222) states that it “grows 
to at least 6 feet and is one of the finest game fishes, fighting fiercely to the 
end; prefers live or moving bait, enters estuaries, and may often be seen in 
pursuit of mullet on the surface.” Superficially Hypacanthus most closely 
resembles Scomberoides but differs in having scaled cheeks and a lateral line 
that is very irregular and sinuous, dropping below midline of body between pelvic 
fins and origin of anal fin. Nothing on the osteology of Hypacanthus has been 
published previously. 

NoMENCLATURE. In his paper on the nomenclature of the European fishes 
of the subfamily Trachinotinae, Wheeler (1963) clearly demonstrated that 
Hypacanthus is a senior synonym of Lichia but chose to regard the older name 
as a nomen oblitum and advocated suppression of the name. We do not believe 
that this action is justified and continue to recognize Hypacanthus. In so doing 
we have taken special note of the fact that the name Hypacanthus has always 
been correctly applied, while fishes belonging to at least four different carangid 
genera have been described as new species of Lichia. 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 229 


In the generic diagnosis of Hypacanthus, Rafinesque referred to only two 
species. One of these species, Centronotus vadigo Lacépéde, is clearly a synonym 
of Scomber amia Linnaeus and is here designated the type-species of Hypa- 
canthus. The other reference was to “Scomber aculeatus di Linnaeus.” As 
noted by Wheeler (1963, p. 535), the species does not seem to exist in Linnaeus’s 
works and it might be argued that Rafinesque wrote “di Linnaeus” in error for 
S. aculeatus Bloch (1793). Bloch’s illustration strongly suggests a species of 
Oligoplites or Scomberoides, and several workers have followed Cuvier and 
Valenciennes (1831, p. 384) in questionably regarding S. aculeatus Bloch as a 
species of Chorinemus (=Scomberoides). We concur with Wheeler (1963, p. 
537) that it is a junior synonym of Hypacanthus amia (Linnaeus). Bloch’s 
illustration shows a fish with 7 first dorsal spines (which does not agree with 
Oligoplites), and the species is reported from the Mediterranean where neither 
Oligo plites or Scomberoides occurs. 

The illustration of Porthmeus argenteus Valenciennes (see fig. 13) is un- 
mistakably based on a young individual of Hypacanthus amia. 

DEscrIPTION. Body moderately to strongly compressed. Adipose eyelids 
developed. Body, including cheeks, covered with narrow, oval-shaped embedded 
scales, becoming needlelike on breast. Lateral-line scales not developed into 
scutes. Lateral line without side branches, very irregular and sinuous, dropping 
below midline of body between pelvic fins and origin of anal fin. Anterior rim 
of shoulder girdle smooth, without fleshy papillae or deep groove near isthmus. 
Premaxillae protractile, separated anteriorly from snout at midline by a complete 
groove. Swimbladder moderately bifid (in adults), bifurcated portion of swim- 
bladder extending posteriorly to beneath caudal vertebra 6 or 7. Posterior 
dorsal- and anal-fin rays not consisting of semidetached finlets; ultimate and 
penultimate rays no more closely spaced than adjoining rays; none of dorsal- 
or anal-fin rays produced into long filments. Pelvic fins relatively short, not 
depressible into shallow abdominal groove. Pectoral fins short, not falcate, 51.2 
to 63.4 percent head length. Maxilla extends posteriorly to slightly behind 
orbital rim, 50.5 to 54.2 percent head length. Body depth (origin D» to Ag) 
31.0 to 39.4 percent fork length. 

Predorsal bones 3; dorsal fin rays VII + I, 19-21; total dorsal rays 27-29. 
Anal-fin rays II-I, 17-20. Pectoral-fin rays I, 18-20. Pelvic-fin rays I, 5. 
Vertebrae 10 + 14 = 24; epipleural ribs 10 or 11. Branchiostegal rays 2% + 
5% (epihyal + ceratohyal). Upper gillrakers 1 or 2; lower gillrakers 8 or 9; 
total gillrakers 9 to 11. 

Fronto-supraoccipital crest low; temporal crest poorly developed, not ex- 
tending forward to posterior rim of orbit and not reaching edge of cranium; 
preorbital region short. Epiotics not united along midline of cranium internally. 
Zygapophyses of exoccipital united beneath foramen magnum. Parasphenoid 


230 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


not expanded into a broad, flattened plate posteriorly. Myodome with broad, 
posterior opening. Basioccipital without a pair of lateral processes on ventral 
surface. Ascending process of premaxilla short and triangular; maxilla moder- 
ately slender, not closely applied to premaxilla. Premaxillary spur absent. Small 
supramaxilla present. Interosseous space between dorsal arm of dentary and 
upper margin of articular moderate. Well developed teeth on dentary, premaxilla, 
palatines, and vomer; dentary and premaxillary teeth slender and pointed, 
arranged in a broad band anteriorly becoming narrower posteriorly; juveniles 
without symphyseal premaxillary and dentary canines. Mesopterygoids edentate. 
Pharyngeals not noticeably enlarged, covered with sharp, pointed teeth. 

Suborbital shelf present; lower and posterior suborbitals not expanded poste- 
riorly so as to cover a large portion of cheek. First basibranchial without tooth 
plates, basibranchials 2—3 each with a pair of small widely separated tooth 
plates. Lower limb of posttemporal not noticeably short or thickened. Post- 
coracoid process moderate. Interpelvic keel well developed; postpelvic process 
on each side not coalesced entire length, forming an apical fork. Inferior 
vertebral foramina present. First anal pterygiophore and haemal spine of 
first caudal vertebra firmly attached to form a strong strut. Anal pterygiophore 
not expanded anterolaterally to form roof over first two anal spines; first two 
anal spines not articulated proximally with each other; second anal spine slightly 
asymmetrical, with shallow depression on one side of anterior face. Caudal 
skeleton with 3 epurals and two pairs of uroneurals. 


Hypacanthus amia (Linnaeus). 

(Figures 13, 14b, 21b, 22b, 24a.) 

Scomber amia LINNAEUS, 1758, p. 299 (based solely on references to Artedi, 1738). 

Scomber aculeatus Biocy, 1793, p. 51, pl. 336, fig. 1 (type locality: no specific locality 
given; reported from coast of Mediterranean and several localities in Caribbean). 

Centronotus vadigo LACEPEDE, 1802, p. 318 (type locality Mediterranean). 

Porthmeus argenteus VALENCIENNES in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1833, p. 256 (191), pl. 264 
(type locality Cape of Good Hope). 


NOMENCLATURE. Wheeler (1963, pp. 536-7) gives a detailed discussion 
of the specific synonymy of Hypacanthus. Some additional comments are given 
in the preceding generic account. 

DeEscriPTION. Since Hypacanthus is monotypic, refer to generic description. 

PIGMENTATION. The young, to at least 120 mm. FL, have prominent vertical 
bands (fig. 13). Judging from a color illustration of a 2'2 inch specimen (Smith, 
1949, pl. 25, fig. 539), the bands are brownish-black and the background color- 
ation is yellow-orange. Adults are brown dorsally, silvery white below the lateral 
line, and have pale brown fins. 

DISTRIBUTION. Mediterranean, eastern Atlantic, and Indian Ocean north 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 231 


Ficure 13. Hypacanthus amia: above, TABL 104703, young adult, 200 mm. FL; below, 
drawing of holotype of Porthmeus argenteus = juvenile H. amia (after Cuvier and Valen- 
ciennes, 1833, pl. 264). 


to Delago Bay, Mozambique. The littoral habitat, general occurrence in sub- 
tropical and temperate waters and absence of Hypacanthus from most of the 
Indian Ocean indicates that the Indian Ocean distribution of Hypacanthus is 
the result of migration around the Cape of Good Hope. 

MATERIAL (24 specimens, 62—202 mm. FL, from 5 collections). MEDI- 
TERRANEAN: Lebanon, St. George Bay, TABL 104703 (5: 62-200, 1 cleared 
and stained), 104714 (15 of 30: 79-110, 2 cleared and stained). LIBERIA: 
Mesurado River, USNM 193783 (1: 202), 193813 (1: 82). SOUTH AFRICA: 
Durban Harbor, TABL 107250 (2: 190). 


RELATIONSHIPS AND ZOOGEOGRAPHY 
GENERA Scomberoides AND Oligoplites. 


The strong external resemblance and large number of characters shared 
by Scomberoides and Oligoplites clearly reflect their intimate relationship, and 
they are usually placed together in their own subfamily—the Scomberoidinae 
(=Chorineminae). Some of the more notable shared characters are the following: 
scales lanceolate or needlelike (fig. 3); the posterior segmented dorsal- and 
anal-fin rays consisting of semi-detached finlets; two distinct types of dentary 


iS) 
Ww 
iS) 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


PAPA =e 
POT TAT AANA WV A Te / 


AAUANDN ADNAN CTA amg 


om, 


WOMAN UAW Vnitr 4 


a 


— FE AA 


= 


hy, 


WR pe mipctte ere yy mnt aT HET ula Ua eva 
fi RE if] I 


Ficure 14. Jaw bones: a, Parona signata, USNM 86715, 148 mm. SL; b, Hypacanthus 
amia, TABL 104714, 100 mm. SL, c, Scomberoides commersonianus, GVF 2195, 86 mm. SL; 
d, S. tol, TABL uncataloged S-V 69-128, 107 mm. SL; e, Oligoplites s. saurus, TABL 107781, 
91.5 mm. SL; f, O. saliens, SU 66973, 122 mm. SL. DN, dentary; AR, articular; AN, angular; 
PMX, premaxilla; MX, maxilla; SMX, supramaxilla. Scale 5.0 mm. 


teeth during different stages of their ontogeny (see discussion below) ; slender, 
nearly straight maxillae that are closely applied to the premaxillae; a broad 
premaxillary frenum; interosseous space between dorsal arm of dentary and 
upper margin of articular minute or absent (fig. 14); the first anal pterygi- 
ophore expanded anterolaterally, forming a roof over anal spines (fig. 15b); 
the first two anal spines articulated proximally with each other, and the second 
anal spine asymmetrical with a deep groove on one side of anterior face, so that 
when anal spines are depressed the first spine folds into the groove in scissor- 
like fashion; caudal skeleton with 2 epurals (fig. 16b); swimbladder strongly 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 233 


Ficure 15. First anal pterygiophore: a, Parona signata, TABL 102908, 80 mm. SL; b, 
Scomberoides tala, TABL S-V 69-156, 109 mm. SL. 


bifid, even in smallest specimens (fig. 17). All of these conditions probably 
represent specializations. 

Each dentary has two rows of teeth in Scomberoides and Oligoplites. In 
most species (exceptions are S. tol and O. saliens) the outer dentary teeth of 
juveniles and young adults have spatulate tips, and are closely spaced and 
strongly hooked outward (fig. 18). This arrangement produces a trough be- 
tween the inner and outer rows of teeth into which the premaxillary teeth fit 
when the mouth is closed. In adults these outer ‘juvenile teeth’ are shed and 
replaced with more robust, wider spaced teeth that are not strongly hooked and 
have pointed tips (figs. 18-19). The inner dentary teeth, consisting of a single 
type, apparently are permanent. We know of no other carangid genus in which 
there are two distinct types of dentary teeth associated with ontogeny. Since 
this unusual adaptive feature is shared by both Scomberoides and Oligoplites, 
we believe the character was possessed by the progenitor of both genera and 
its loss in S. tol and O. saliens must be interpreted as a subsequent specialization. 
Major (1973) has correlated this change in dentition in Scomberoides lysan, Oligo- 
plites refulgens, and O. saurus inornatus with a shift in feeding habits. Juveniles 
and young feed primarily on larval crustaceans, and on scales and epidermis of 
schooling fishes. He suggested that the outer spatulate dentary teeth are inserted 
under the scales, which are then ripped off. With growth and loss of ‘juvenile’ 


234 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


E1 Eo UN 


Ficure 16. Caudal skeleton: a, Parona signata, USNM 86715, 148 mm. SL; b, Scom- 
beroides commersonianus, GVF 2195, 86 mm. SL. E, epural; UN, uroneural. 


teeth there is a gradual shift in diet until these species become fully piscivorous, 
ingesting whole fish. In juveniles of all species of Scomberoides except S. lysan 
the symphyseal dentary and premaxillary teeth are robust and caninelike (figs. 
14c-d). Such teeth are greatly reduced or absent in the adults; they are never 
present in Oligoplites. 

Carr and Adams (1972) found that ectoparasites, primarily caligoid co- 


50 mm 


Ficure 17. Lateral and ventral view of swimbladder of Scomberoides tala, TABL 107712, 
264 mm. FL. 


Vor. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 235 


b 0.5 mm : 


Ficure 18. Lateral and frontal view of outer row, dentary tooth of Oligoplites s. saurus: 
a, juvenile 90 mm. FL; b, adult 185 mm. FL. 


236 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


160 
SCOMBEROIDES 
fe} 
140 COMMERSONIANUS e 
° tier Che TALA 
fe) Oo 
° 2 ° <) LYSAN 
120 
° é r TOL 
s ° ° e CS 
100 A 
oO ge Se 
e @o 
Ce mle x * Ce ou “eo 
[a ° 
Lu i 
60 fe ° 
= 3 
e 
‘@) 40 2.2 ee ° 
% e @o * x * 
+ x * 
0 e ae Hers ov e ox = Ba On 5 
2 * 2a se x Ge *& & e 
== x ke RE Oe Ok 0 OE a # xO * ° 
20 Pig Why Fw * we : x 
Le le aes 
ae 
- 1 L l l l L l l Nl ! ] 
LL 
Lu 200 x 
180 Oh ° 
> oer oe he, C OLIGOPLITES 
ce &° 2 e 
q 160 SAURUS 
ee 
hom A e Ets PALOMETA 
e 
<. A ; REFULGENS 
uj 14° oe: QD ¢ A 
e LIENS 
a eee 
e fo) fe} 
e e ° ° 
LL os ee ° o 9°90 < 
e ° OX 
oO ° fo) x ° 
2 ° 
oc 100 ion ay 
bed yr * 
x 
LLJ %, > 
fea) 80 x * 
= . 
= 60 ovr 
x e 
* e~- 82 e [efe) e 
wey, ee eo Om & e 
40 tee BORG 
+r x? a eo 8 e 
z wr, x * riko gt e 
x * 
20 x * 
| | | : | | ! | | it 
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 


FORK LENGTH (mm) 


Ficure 19. Scatter diagram of outer row teeth on dentary (one side) plotted against 
fork length for species of Scomberoides and Oligoplites (O. altus and eastern Pacific specimens 
of O. saurus were not plotted). 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 237 


mo)66hCUlMh ee SC 


Ficure 20. Upper dentition: a, Parona signata, TABL 101156, 271 mm. FL; b, Scom- 
beroides tol, TABL 107707, 284 mm. FL; c, Oligoplites s. saurus, TABL 105364, 230 mm. FL. 
PMX, premaxilla; V, vomer; PA, palatine; MSP, mesopterygoid. 


pepods, accounted for approximately 50 percent of the stomach contents of ju- 
veniles of Oligoplites s. saurus 26 to 40 mm. SL. In contrast, ectoparasites con- 
stituted only 2 to 4 percent of the stomach contents in fish less than 26 mm. or 
greater than 60 mm. SL. Although no feeding observations were made, they 
postulated that this carangid passes through a stage in its development in which 
intentional removal of ectoparasites from other fishes is an important activity. 
Most of the fish skin, flesh, and scales found in the stomachs of juveniles was 
presumed to have come from cleaning activities. Major (1973) believed that 
scales and/or epidermal tissue was the primary food source sought by juveniles 
of Scomberoides lysan in Hawaii. His analysis of the stomach contents of Oligo- 
plites juveniles is inconclusive, since the smallest specimen examined was 48 
mm. SL. If the conclusions regarding the primary food source sought by ju- 
veniles of Oligoplites and Scomberoides are valid, they may provide valuable 
insight into the evolution of cleaning symbiosis in fishes. Ectoparasite removal 
seems to be a more specialized type of feeding than is aggressive scale ingestion, 
although one that might easily have evolved from the latter activity. 

The following characters of Oligoplites are interpreted as specializations of 
the condition found in Scomberoides and suggest that the amphi-American 
endemic distribution of Oligoplites is a relatively recent evolutionary develop- 
ment (this does not necessarily imply that the genus evolved elsewhere): 1) 
reduced number of dorsal spines with a concomitant increase in number of pre- 
dorsal bones (see discussion under Characters and Methods Section) ; 2) loss of 
mesopterygoid teeth (fig. 20c); 3) loss of supramaxilla; 4) loss of suborbital 


238 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


FicureE 21. Lateral and dorsal view of suborbital bones: a, Parona signata TABL 102908, 
83 mm. SL; b, Hypacanthus amia, TABL 104714, 100 mm. SL; c, Scomberoides tol, TABL 
S-V 69-128, 122 mm. SL; d, Oligoplites s. saurus, TABL 107781, 91.5 mm. SL. Third suborbital 
bone shaded. 


shelf (Smith and Bailey, 1962) and expansion of suborbitals 2—4 posteriorly 
across cheek (fig. 21d), a character best developed in large specimens; 5) re- 
duction in number of branchiostegal rays (fig. 22d); and 6) presence of needle- 
like scales in all species. Steps in the evolution from broadly lanceolate to 
needlelike scales can be seen in figure 3. 

We believe that Oligoplites evolved from a Scomberoides-like ancestor that 
reached the New World via the Pacific. Although the East Pacific Barrier re- 
stricts the distributions of many groups of tropical shorefishes (Briggs, 1961), 
it is not such a formidable obstacle to carangids as evidenced by the relatively 


> 


Ficure 22. Left hyoid arch; branchiostegal rays shown in black: a, Parona signata, 
USNM 86715, 148 mm. SL; b, Hypacanthus amia, TABL 104714, 100 mm. SL; c, Scom- 
beroides tol, TABL S-V 69-128, 122 mm. SL; d, Oligoplites s. saurus, TABL 107781, 91.5 
mm. SL. 


VoL. XXXIX] 


SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 


240 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


] 


Ficure 23. Fifth and sixth precaudal vertebrae (pleural ribs are shown in _ black): 
a, Parona signata, TABL 102908, 80 mm. SL; b, Scomberoides commersonianus, GVF 
2195, 86 mm. SL. 


large number of circumtropical genera and species. One widely distributed 
Indo-West Pacific carangid, Caranx (Gnathanodon) speciosus (Forskal), that 
has become established in the eastern Pacific appears to be a recent migrant 
across this several thousand mile stretch of open ocean. The wide distribution 
of Scomberoides lysan in the central Pacific demonstrates that this group of 
carangids also has the ability to cross large stretches of oceanic water. Given 
this potential, it is not difficult to envision successful bridging of the East Pacific 
Barrier by a Scomberoides-like carangid. As previously noted, the nature of the 
characters that differentiate Oligoplites from Scomberoides indicates a relatively 
recent evolutionary separation. This suggests that by the time the progenitor 
of Oligoplites reached the new world it possessed most of the characters present 
in Scomberoides. 

Although inconclusive, the known fossil carangid record supports the above 
hypothesis. Middle Eocene deposits from Monte Bolca near Verona, Italy con- 
tain a fairly rich carangid fauna (Blot, 1969) but no Oligoplites-like fossil has 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 241 


Ficure 24. Basibranchial tooth plates (shown in black) and basihyal teeth (stippled): 
a, Hypacanthus amia, TABL 104714, 100 mm. SL; b, Scomberoides tala, TABL S-V 69- 
156, 109 mm. SL; c, Oligoplites saliens, SU 66973, 122 mm. SL; d, Parona signata, TABL 
102908, 80 mm. SL. 


been found. The only record of a fossil Oligoplites outside the new world ap- 
pears to have been based on a misidentification (see discussion of Scomberoides 
spinosus). 


GENUS Parona. 


Parona parallels Scomberoides (and Oligoplites) in several of its specialized 
characters, has others not found elsewhere in the Carangidae, and shares with 
Hypacanthus and Trachinotus a number of generalized (primitive) characters 
that have become specialized in the Scomberoidinae. Characters that suggest 
affinity with Scomberoides are the broadly united epiotics, high number of caudal 
vertebrae, fusion of the basibranchial tooth plates and presence of a premaxillary 
frenum. In having the epiotics broadly united internally, Parona possesses a 
character utilized by Starks (1911) and Suzuki (1962) in defining the subfamily 
Scomberoidinae. The shape of the precaudal vertebrae and the position of attach- 
ment of the pleural ribs is very different from the condition in Scomberoides (fig. 
23). This is probably due to differences in body shape however, because Parona 
and Tvrachinotus ovatus (Linnaeus), which have considerably deeper bodies 
than do the species of Scomberoides, have precaudal vertebrae that are nearly 
identical. 


242 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 25. Posttemporal, clavicle, hypercoracoid, hypocoracoid, and radials (arrow points 
to postcoracoid process): a, Parona signata, TABL 102908, 80 mm. SL; b, Scomberoides 
commersonianus, GVF 2195, 86 mm. SL. 


Nelson (1969, p. 500) noted that there are three pairs of basibranchial tooth 
plates in Chorinemus, and the median plates of Parona (fig. 24d) must have 
arisen through fusion of such paired elements (his ‘““Chorinemus occidentalis” = 
Oligoplites s. saurus). He also stated (p. 502) that ‘‘jaw protrusion and pharyn- 
geal-bone mobility seem to be improvements, and shearing and grinding jaw 
dentitions are specializations, inversely correlated with basibranchial dentition. 
The large paired plates (and their median derivatives, e.g., in Parona) that in 
some cases occur over the basibranchials of teleosts could represent a reversal 
in the general trend toward loss of basibranchial dentition. Functionally, this 
reversal would mean that the basibranchial area in some cases is secondarily 
involved in seizing and holding large prey.” Since the species of Parona, Scom- 
beroides, and Oligoplites have the best developed basibranchial dentition in the 
family, comprise the only carangid genera that have a premaxillary frenum 
(which restricts upper jaw protrusability), and feed on large prey as adults, we 
believe that the well developed basibranchial plates of these genera represent a 
secondary specialization associated with mode of feeding. 

The mutual occurrence in these genera of several derived character states 
that are not found in any other carangids is here interpreted as evidence that 
Parona and Scomberoides evolved from a common ancestor. Although some of 
the shared specializations, especially those associated with trophic ecology, might 
be due to parallelism, this does not seem likely in the case of united epiotics. 

Parona differs from all other carangids in having typically 9 branchiostegal 


Vout. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 243 


rays and in lacking pelvic fins (a small pelvic girdle is retained). The pelvic 
fins are very reduced, however, in Trachinoius stilbe (jordan and McGregor), 
and in fossil trachinotid genus Paratrachinotus (Blot, 1969, p. 285). The lat- 
eral line of Parona is unusual in having 5—9 dorsal branches. The mesopterygoid 
teeth are firmly ankylosed to the mesopterygoid in Scomberoides. In Parona the 
‘mesopterygoid’ teeth are free-floating and thus may not be homologous. The first 
anal pterygiophore and articulation of the first two anal spines is very general- 
ized compared to the complex arrangement in Scombcroides. Other generalized 
characters of Parona are the relatively broad, curved maxillae; well developed 
interosseous space between dorsal arm of dentary and upper margin of articular; 
large supramaxillae; caudal skeleton with 3 epurals; and broad, oval-shaped 
scales. The shoulder girdle of Parona differs from that of all other carangids, 
except those of the subfamily Naucratinae, in having a well developed postcora- 
coid process (fig. 25a). 

The large number of differences between Parona and Scomberoides suggest 
that they have had a long history of evolutionary separation. The restriction 
of Parona to subtropical and temperate waters of the South Atlantic Ocean prob- 
ably reflects an extended period of isolation in that region. 


Genus Hypacanthus. 


Hypacanthus differs from the previous genera in having inferior vertebral 
foramina; post-pelvic processes forming an apical fork; the lateral line very 
irregular and sinuous, dropping below the midline of body between the pelvics 
and origin of anal fin; poorly developed basibranchial dentition; young with 
strong vertical bars (young of the other genera lack such bars); and completely 
scaled cheeks. The most notable thing about Hypacanthus is the lack of any 
obvious specialized characters (except perhaps the lateral line). The eastern 
Atlantic-Mediterranean distribution of Hypacanthus and its general occurrence 
in subtropical and temperate waters supports the hypothesis that it evolved in 
the Mediterranean region. 

The exact phyletic position of Hypacanthus is obscure owing to the lack of 
specialized characters which might be useful in determining relationships. The 
greatly reduced basibranchial dentition of Hypacanthus (fig. 24a), suggests, 
however, that it did not share a common ancestor with Parona-Scomberoides. 

Trachinotus, a circumtropical genus consisting of about 19 species (F. H. 
Berry, personal communication) that is at least superficially similar to Hypa- 
canthus, differs from Hypacanthus and the other genera most notably in having 
dentary and premaxillary teeth that are poorly developed or absent; upper pha- 
ryngeals that are noticeably enlarged and covered with blunt, molariform teeth; 
the parasphenoid expanded into a broad, flattened plate posteriorly; and the 
basioccipital with a pair of lateral processes on its ventral surface. The complete 


244 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


absence of basibranchial dentition in Trachinotus represents the end product of 
a trend toward specialization in the opposite direction from that of Parona- 
Scomberoides. All of the above characters are probably correlated and constitute 
a single character complex associated with trophic ecology. Although the species 
of Trachinotus comprise a well defined group, there are no characters that are 
useful in establishing from what group of carangids they evolved. 


SUBFAMILIAL RECOGNITION. 


In comparing the Carangidae to the Scombridae, Starks (1911) made the 
following observations which illustrate some of the problems encountered in 
subfamilial partitioning of the Carangidae: ‘“‘The family Carangidae is a much 
more compact group than the Scombridae. The gaps between the genera are 
much smaller, and though the osteological characters, like the form of the body, 
differ much in the extremes of variation, there are no sudden or complete 
changes.” Although he recognized four subfamilies (Scomberoidinae, Trachin- 
otinae, Naucratinae, and Caranginae), Starks (1911, p. 30) acknowledged the 
largely artificial nature of these subfamilies by stating: “though Selene is not 
nearly so closely related to Trachyurops |= Selar|—for instance—as some 
forms are to each other that are here arranged in different subfamilies, there is no 
place to draw a dividing line.” Parona and Scomberoides are probably no more 
divergent phylogenetically than are some genera presently placed together in 
the subfamily Caranginae. Within the present classification of the family, Parona 
might be recognized as a monotypic tribe in the subfamily Scomberoidinae. 
Hypacanthus would require its own subfamily, since its relationship to other 
carangid genera is obscure. Until the relationships of the other genera are better 
understood, we prefer not to recognize any carangid subfamilies. 

The following characters shared, in combination, by Oligoplites, Scomberoides, 
Parona, Trachinotus, and Hy pacanthus distinguish them as a group from all other 
carangids: lateral line without scutes; body moderately to strongly compressed; 
second dorsal-fin base approximately equal in length to anal-fin base; and haemal 
spine of first caudal vertebra and first anal pterygiophore firmly attached to form 
a strong strut. These characters may, however, have little or no phylogenetic 
significance. Other characters possessed by these five genera are summarized in 
table 7. 


PHYLOGENETIC POSITION OF Campogramma REGAN, 1903 
(Figure 26) 


Wheeler (1963) illustrated this poorly known eastern Atlantic-Mediterranean 
carangid and discussed its nomenclatural history. We agree with Wheeler (1963, 
p. 538) that the description of Centronotus glaycos Lacépéde, 1803 is sufficiently 
diagnostic to determine its specific identity, thereby establishing it as a senior 
synonym of the widely used but nomenclaturally invalid name Campogramma 


VoL. XXXIX] 


TABLE 7. 


SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 


Summary of selected characters used to define genera. 


245 


Character 


epiotics united 
internally 


fronto-supraoccipital 
crest 


suborbital shelf 


suborbitals 2—4 
expanded posteriorly 


interosseous space 
between dentary and 
articular 


supramaxilla 
premaxillary frenum 


dentary teeth 


‘mesopterygoid’ 
teeth 


branchiostegal rays 


basibranchial tooth 
plates 


caudal vertebrae 


inferior 
vertebral foramina 


epural bones 
predorsal bones 


dorsal-fin rays 


posterior dorsal- 
and anal-fin rays 


pelvic fins 


postpelvic 
processes 


postcoracoid 
process 


first anal 
pterygiophore 
expanded antero- 
laterally, forming roof 
over anal spines 


body scales 


cheek scales 


lateral line 


swimbladder 


Trachinotust Hypacanthus Parona Scomberoides Oligoplites 
no no yes yes yes 
high low high low low 
present present present present absent 
no no no no yes 
well developed moderate well developed minute minute or 
absent 
absent small large small absent 
absent absent present present present 
(narrow ) (wide) (wide) 
villiform band wide band narrow band 2 rows 2 rows 
(often absent (single row 
in adults) posteriorly ) 
absent absent present (free- present (ankylosed absent 
floating) to bone) 
7-8 8 9 8 7 
absent poorly well developed well developed well developed 
developed (large median (paired plates) (paired plates) 
plate) 
14 14 17 16 16 
absent present absent absent absent 
3 3 2 2 
4or 5 4 3 or 4 4 to 6 
(rarely 5) (rarely 4) (rarely 4) 
VI-VII+ VII+ VI-VII+ VI-VII+ IV-VI 
I, 16-29 I, 19-21 I, 32-38 I, 19-21 (rarely VI)+ 
1 ail 
normal normal normal semidetached semidetached 
finlets finlets 
present present absent present present 
united forming apical united united united 
distally fork distally distally distally 
moderate moderate well developed absent absent 
no no no yes yes 
(fig. 15a) (fig. 15b) like Scom- 
beroides 
oval-shaped oval-shaped, oval-shaped broadly lanceo- needlelike 
becoming strongly late to needlelike 
lanceolate on (fig. 3) 
breast 
present or present absent absent absent 
absent 
normal irregular and 5—9 dorsal normal normal 
sinuous dropping — branches 
below midline of 
body between pel- 
vics and anal fin 
simple (young) simple (young) simple strongly bifid strongly bifid 


to moderately 
bifid (adults) 


to moderately 
bifid (adults) 


(all sizes) 


(all sizes) 


(all sizes) 


1 Several unique characters of Trachinotus not included here are discussed in the text under Relationships 


and Zoogeography. 


246 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


FIGURE 26. Campogramma glaycos, BMNH 1892.4.20.3, 377 mm. SL. Mediterranean. 
Snout appears unnaturally short due to bent condition of specimen. 


vadigo (Risso, 1810). We do not agree with Wheeler who treated C. glaycos as 
a nomen oblitum because past workers either overlooked the name or considered 
it unavailable because of homonymy with Lichia glauca of authors. In fact, 
C. glaycos can not be considered a homonym of the differently spelled L. glauca. 
Campogramma liro proposed by Dollfus (1955, p. 58) as a replacement name 
for C. vadigo Risso is unnecessary. A junior synonym of Campogramma glaycos 
(Lacépéde) overlooked by Wheeler is Oligoplites africana Delsman (1941). 
Bauchot and Blanc (1963, p. 53) proposed Solagmedens with Oligoplites africana 
as the type species. They apparently were unaware of the description of 
Cam pogramma. 

Recent authors have assigned the monotypic Cam pogramma to the subfamily 
Trachinotinae, but without presenting substantiating data. Characters used to 
define the Trachinotinae that are associated with trophic ecology, such as en- 
larged pharyngeals and expansion of the parasphenoid posteriorly into a broad 
flattened plate, are absent in Campogramma. Three external characters of Cam- 
pogramma that are shared, in combination, exclusively with naucratinine (= 
Seriolinae) genera are: lateral line without scutes; body terete, only slightly 
compressed; anal-fin base shorter than second dorsal-fin base. 

The osteology of Campogramma suggests that it evolved from a form close 
to Seriola. The haemal spine of the first caudal vertebra is weakly articulated 
with the first anal pterygiophore, not enlarged and indistinguishable from the 
haemal spines of other caudal vertebrae. In lateral view the anterior margin of 
the first anal pterygiophore is distinctly concave, with a free distal tip, as in 
most species of Serviola (Mather, 1971, p. 186, fig. 3b). The last three pairs of 
parapophyses are connected dorsally by a bony bridge which encircles the haemal 
canal, and the last two are united distally to form a single haemal spine. As 
noted by Starks (1911, p. 29), in the other carangid subfamilies the posterior 
parapophyses are distinct, and not united as a single haemal spine, though a 
bony bridge connects their bases. Other characters shared with Seriola are: 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 247 


zygapophyses of exoccipital joined beneath foramen magnum; myodome with a 
large posterior opening; large supramaxilla; premaxillary spur present; branchios- 
tegal rays 3 + 4 (epihyal + ceratohyal); vertebrae 10 + 14 = 24; caudal skel- 
eton with 3 epurals; cluster of free-floating, irregularly shaped patches of minute 
granular teeth overlying mesopterygoids; and swimbladder not bifid. 

Campogramma is distinguished from all other genera of Naucratinae in 
having a single row of caniniform teeth in both jaws, naked cheeks, partially 
naked breast, and slightly falcate pectoral fins. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. BMNH 1893.2.24.3, 112 mm. SL, cleared and 
stained; BMNH 1892.4.20.3, 377 mm. SL, x-rayed. 


SUMMARY 


The carangid fish genera Scomberoides, Oligoplites, Parona, and Hypacanthus 
are revised. These four genera, along with Trachinotus, are distinguishable as 
a group from all other genera of Carangidae. Campogramma, formerly placed 
in the subfamily Trachinotinae, is considered to be more closely related to 
Seriola. 

Scomberoides consists of four recent species, S. commersonianus Lacépéde, 
S. tala (Cuvier), S. lysan (Forskal), and S. tol (Cuvier). Scomberoides spinosus 
(Smirnov), described from Lower Miocene deposits, is believed to be closely 
related to S. tol. Scomberoides lysan, consistently treated as a senior synonym 
of S. commersonianus, is instead a senior synonym of the widely used S. tolo- 
oparah (Riippell). The species of Scomberoides range from the Indian Ocean 
and Red Sea into the central Pacific; only one species, S. /ysan, occurs east of 
the Solomon Islands and frequents entirely oceanic habitats. 

Oligoplites consists of five species, O. saurus (Bloch and Schneider), O. 
saliens (Bloch), O. palometa (Cuvier), O. refulgens Gilbert and Starks, and 
O. altus (Ginther). Oligoplites mundus Jordan and Starks is placed in the 
synonymy of O. altus. The genus is restricted to the eastern Pacific and west- 
ern Atlantic oceans; only O. saurus occurs in both oceans. 

Parona, a monotypic genus restricted to the western South Atlantic Ocean, 
is believed to be most closely related to Scomberoides and Oligoplites. Parona 
signata (Jenyns) is unique among carangids in that it lacks pelvic fins. 

Hypacanthus, also monotypic, has a littoral distribution in the Mediterranean 
Sea, along the Atlantic coast of Africa, and the southern Indian Ocean. Hypa- 
canthus ania (Linnaeus) is the least specialized of the carangids studied. 

Osteological descriptions are given for Scomberoides, Oligoplites, Parona, 
and Hypacanthus. Of the genera treated, Scomberoides and Oligoplites are the 
most closely related, with Oligoplites the most specialized. Within the frame- 
work of the present classification of the family Carangidae the two monotypic 
genera would require their own subfamilies. The phyletic relationship of all 
of these genera is such that we do not recognize any subfamilies. 


248 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


APPENDIX 


List oF NoMINAL SPECIES OF Scomberoides AND Oligoplites, INCLUDING 
SomME NAMES ORIGINALLY ASSIGNED TO ONE OF THESE GENERA (OR THEIR 
SYNONYMS) THAT WERE MISAPPLIED OR ARE UNIDENTIFIABLE. 


The following list gives in order: (1) the scientific name in alphabetical order 
by species as it originally appeared (capitalized specific names in lower case, 
however); (2) the author or authors (Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1831 is ab- 
breviated to C. & V., 1831, and Jordan and Evermann, 1898 is abbreviated to 
J. & E. 1898); (3) date of publication; (4) page reference (see literature cited 
section for complete reference); the genus and species to which we currently 
assign the species, if such is possible. Included are several nominal species 
described in Scomberoides or Chorinemus that are unidentifiable. The basis for 
our assignment of nominal species of Scomberoides is discussed in the text under 
their senior synonyms. Unless stated otherwise in the text, synonymy of Oligo- 
plites species follows that of Schultz (1945). 


Species, author, publication date, and page 


reference Present allocation 

Oligoplites africana Delsman, 1941, p. 52 Campogramma glaycos 
Lichia albacora Guichenot, 1848, p. 231 ?Oligo plites altus 

Chorinemus altus Giinther, 1868, p. 433 Oligo plites altus 

Scomber calcar Bloch, 1793, p. 46 2Oligoplites saliens 
Scomberoides commersonnianus Lacépeéde, 

1802, p. 50 Scomberoides commersonianus 
Chorinemus delicatulus Richardson, 1846, 

p. 269 Scomberoides commersonianus 
Chorinemus exoletus Ehrenberg in C. & V., 

1831, p.379 (278) Scomberoides commersonianus 
Chorinemus farkharrii Cuvier in C. & V., 

1831, p. 388 (285) unidentifiable (?Scombridae) 
Scomberoides formosanus Wakiya, 1924, 

p. 236 Scomberoides tol 
Scomberoides formosanus Oshima [non 

Wakiya], 1925, p. 349 Scomberoides lysan 

Scomber forsteri Bloch & Schneider, 1801, 

p. 26 Scomberoides lysan 
Chorinemus guaribira Cuvier in C. & V., 

1831, p. 393 (289) Oligo plites palometa 
Chorinemus hainanensis Chu and Cheng, 

1958, pool? Scomberoides tala 


Oligo plites inornatus Gill, 1863, p. 166 Oligo plites saurus inornatus 


VoL. XXXIX] 


Chorinemus lanceolatus Girard, 1858, 

p. 168 

Chorinemus leucopthalmus Richardson, 1846, 
p. 269 

Scomber lysan Forskal, 1775, p. 54 
Scomber maculatus Forster, 1844, p. 195 
Chorinemus maculosus Saville-Kent, 1893, 
p. 369 


Scomber madagascariensis Shaw, 1803, 

p. 590 

Chorinemus mauritianus Cuvier in C. & V., 
1831, p. 382 (281) 

Chorinemus moadetta Ehrenberg in C. & V., 
1831, p. 382 (280) 

Thynnus moluccensis Gronovius in Gray, 
1854, p. 121 

Oligoplites mundus Jordan & Starks in 

J. &E., 1898, p. 2844 

Scomberoides noelii Lacépede, 1802, p. 50 
Chorinemus occidentalis Gunther, 1860, 
p. 475 

Chorinemus orientalis Temminck & Schlegel, 
1844, p. 106 

Scomberoides oshimae Whitley, 1951, p. 65 
Chorinemus palometa Cuvier in C. & V., 
1831, p. 392 (288) 

Eleria philip pina Jordan & Seale, 1905, p. 744 
Lichia quiebra Quoy & Gaimard, 1824, p. 365 
Oligoplites rathbuni Miranda-Riberio, 
1915, p. 8 

Oligoplites refulgens Gilbert & Starks, 

1904, p. 73 

Scomber saliens Bloch, 1793, p. 41 
Chorinemus saltans Cuvier in C.& V., 

1831, p. 393 (289) 

Scomberoides saltator Lacépede, 1802, p. 50 
Chorinemus sancti petri Cuvier in C. & V., 
1831, p.379 (279) 

Scomber saurus Bloch & Schneider, 1801, 
peo2 


SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: 


CARANGIDAE 249 


Oligo plites s. saurus 
Scomberoides commersonianus 
Scomberoides lysan 


Scomberoides lysan 


nomen nudum (Scomberoides 
species ) 


Scomberoides commersonianus 
Scomberoides lysan 
Scomberoides lysan 
Scomberoides lysan 


Oligo plites altus 
unidentifiable (?Scombridae ) 


Oligoplites s. saurus 


Scomberoides lysan 
Scomberoides lysan 


Oligo plites palometa 
Scomberoides tala 
Oligo plites (?s. saurus) 


Oligo plites s. saurus 


Oligo plites refulgens 
Oligo plites saliens 


Oligo plites s. saurus 
Oligo plites saliens 


Scomberoides lysan 


Oligo plites s. saurus 


250 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Palaeoscomber spinosus Smirnov, 1936, 


p. 49-59 Scomberoides spinosus 
Chorinemus tala Cuvier in C. & V., 1831, 

pe ov? (277) Scomberoides tala 
Chorinemus tol Cuvier in C. & V., 1831, 

p. 385 (283) Scomberoides tol 
Chorinemus toloo Cuvier in C. & V., 1831, 

pest GATT) Scomberoides (?tala) 
Lichia tolooparah Riippell, 1828, p. 91 Scomberoides lysan 


LITERATURE CITED 


ANDERSON, EDGAR 
1949. Introgressive hybridization. New York, John Wiley and Sons., ix + 109 pp., 
23 figs., 5 pls. 
ANNUNZIATA, GIANCARLO, AND DANILO CEDRONE 
1972. Mar della Tranquillita. Mondo Sommerso, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 56-63, 12 figs. 
ARTEDI, PETER 
1738. Ichthyologiae. Edited Carolus Linnaeus. 5 pars. Lugduni Batavorum. (Not seen.) 
BARNARD, KEPPEL H. 
1927. A monograph of the marine fishes of South Africa. Annals of the South African 
Museum, vol. 21, part 2, pp. 419-1065, pls. 18-37. 
Baucnuot, M. L., anp M. BLAnc. 
1963. Poissons marins de l'Est Atlantique Tropical II. Percoidei (Téléosteens Per- 
ciformes) 2° partie. Atlantide Report No. 7, pp. 37-61, 3 figs. 
BErG, CARLOS 
1895. Enumeracion sistematica y sinonimica de los peces de las costas Argentina y 
Uruguaya; contribucion al estudio de los peces sudamericanos. Anales del 
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires, vol. 4, pp. 1-120. 
BERRY, FREDRICK H. 
1968. A new species of carangid fish (Decapterus tabl) from the western Atlantic. 
Contributions in Marine Science, vol. 13, pp. 145-167, 4 figs. 
BIGELOW, Henry B., AND WILLIAM C. SCHROEDER 
1953. Fishes of the Gulf of Maine. Bulletin of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, vol. 53, vili + 577 pp., 288 figs. 
Biocu, Marc ELIESER 
1793. Naturgeschichte der Auslandischen Fische. Berlin, vol. 7, xii + 144 pp., pls. 
325-360. 
Biocu, Marc ELIESER, AND JOHN GOTTLOB SCHNEIDER 
1801. Systema ichthyologiae iconibus cx illustratum, 1. Sanderiamo Commissum, Berlin, 
lx + 584 pp., 110 pls. 
Biot, JACQUES 
1969. Les poissons fossiles du Monte Bolca Calsses jusqui’ici dans les familles des 
Carangidae, Menidae, Ephippidae, Scatophagidae. Memorie del Museo Civico 
di Storia Naturale di Verona, Serie no. 2, vol. 1, viii + 525 pp., 160 figs. vol. 2, 
84 pls. 
BREDER, CHARLES M., JR. 
1942. On the behavior of young Oligoplites saurus (Bloch and Schneider). Copeia, 1942, 
no. 4, pp. 267, 1 fig. 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 251 


Briccs, JoHN C. 

1961. The East Pacific Barrier and the distribution of marine shore fishes. Evolution, 

vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 545-554, 3 figs. 
Carr, WILLIAM E. S., anp CLayTon A. ADAMS 

1972. Food habits of juvenile marine fishes: evidence of the cleaning habit in the 
leatherjacket, Oligoplites saurus, and the spottail pinfish, Diplodus holbrooki. 
Fishery Bulletin, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1111-1120, 2 figs. 

CHAN, WILLIAM L. 

1968. Marine fishes of Hong Kong. Government Press, Hong Kong, xxv + 129 pp., 

20 figs., 71 pls. 
Cuu, Y. T., AnD W. L. CHENG 
1958. Descriptions of two new species of Carangoid fishes from the South Sea of China. 
Acta Zoologica Sinica, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 316-321, 2 figs. 
CUVIER, GEORGES 
1817. Le régne animal. Paris, vol. 2, 532 pp. 
Cuvier, GEORGES, AND ACHILLE VALENCIENNES 
1831. Histoire naturelle des poissons. F. G. Levrault, Paris, vol. 8, ixi + 512 pp. 
1833. Histoire naturelle des poissons. F. G. Levrault, Paris, vol. 9, xxix + 512 pp. 
DANIL’cHENKO, P. G. 

1960. Bony Fishes of the Maikop Deposits of the Caucasus. Transactions of the Pale- 
ontological Institute, vol. 78, vii + 247 pp., 37 figs., 28 pls. (Transaction IPST 
no. 1885, Israel Program for Scientific Translations.) 

Day, FRANCIS 
1878-1888. The fishes of India. London, vol. 1, xx + 816 pp., vol. 2, 198 pls. 
DELSMAN, HIversuM C. 

1941. Pisces. Résultats scientifique de Croisiéres du navire-école Belge “Mercator.” 
Mémoires du Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Beligique, vol. 3, series 10, 
fasc. 21, pp. 47-82, 12 figs. 

Dottrus, R. P. 

1955. Premiére contribution a l’e’tablissement d’un fichier ichthyologique du Maroc 
Atlantique de Tangier a l’embouchure de l’oued dra. Travaux. Institut Scien- 
tifique Chérifien, ser. zool., no. 6, pp. 1-226. (Not seen.) 

EVERMANN, BARTON W., AND WILLIAM C. KENDALL 

1906. Notes on a collection of fishes from Argentina, South America, with descriptions 
of three new species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, vol. 
31, no. 1482, pp. 67-108, 4 figs. 

ForsKAL, PETRUS 

1775. Descriptiones animalium, avium, amphibiorum, piscium, insectorum, vermium; 

quae in itinere orientali observavit. Molleri, Hauniae, xxxiv + 164 pp. 
ForSTER, JOHANN REINHOLD 

1844. Descriptiones animalium quae in itinere ad maris Australis terras per annos 1772, 

1773 et 1774 suscepto. Edited Heinrich Lichtenstein, xiii + 424 pp. 
Fow Ler, Henry W. 

1905. New, rare, or little known scombroids II. Proceedings of the Academy of Nat- 
ural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 62, pp. 56-88, 5 figs. 

1944. Fishes im Results of the fifth George Vanderbilt Expedition (1941). Academy 
of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, monograph 6, pp. 57-583, 264 figs., 20 pls. 

1945. Fishes of Chile. Systematic catalog—Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 
anos 45-47 (1941-1943) 1945, pp. 1-175, 137 unnumbered figs. 


252 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


GILBERT, CARTER R., AND DONALD P. KELSO 

1971. Fishes of the Tortuguero Area, Caribbean Costa Rica. Bulletin Florida State 

Museum, biological sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-54, 6 figs. 
GILBERT, CHARLES H., AND EDWIN C. STARKS 

1904. The fishes of Panama Bay. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences, 

vol. 4, pp. 1-304, 33 pls. 
GILL, THEODORE 

1863. Descriptive enumeration of a collection of fishes from the west coast of Central 
America, presented to the Smithsonian Institution by Capt. John M. Dow. 
Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1863, pp. 
162-174. 

GIRARD, CHARLES 

1858. Notes upon various new genera and new species of fishes, in the museum of the 
Smithsonian Institution, and collected in connection with the United States and 
Mexican Boundary Survey: Major William Emory, Commissioner. Pro- 
ceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 10, pp. 
167-171. 

GOSLINE, WILLIAM A., VERNON E. Brock 
1965. Handbook of Hawaiian Fishes, University of Hawaii Press, 372 pp., 277 figs. 
Gray, JoHN EDWARD 

1854. Catalogue of fishes collected and described by L. T. Gronow, now in the British 

Museum. London, 196 pp. (Not seen.) 
GUICHENOT, ALPHONSE 

1848. Fauna Chilena. Peces zm Gray, Caludio. Historia fisica y politica de Chile ... 

Paris, (“En Casa del Autor”) Zoologia, Tomo Segundo, pp. 137-372. 
GUNTER, GORDON, AND GORDON E. HALL 

1963. Additions to the list of euryhaline fishes of North America. Copeia, 1963, no. 3, 

pp. 596-597. 
GUNTHER, ALBERT 

1860. Catalogue of fishes in the British Museum, vol. 2, xxi + 548 pp. 

1868. An account of the fishes of the states of Central America, based on collections 
made by Capt. J. M. Dow, F. Godman, Esq., and O. Salvin, Esq. Transactions 
of the Zoological Society of London, vol. 6, pp. 377-494, pls. 63-87. 

HAtLsTEAD, Bruce W., Dana D. DANIELSON, WAYNE J. BALDWIN, AND PAuL C. ENGEN 

1972. Morphology of the venom apparatus of the leatherback fish Scomberoides 
sanctipetri (Cuvier). Toxicon, vol. 10, pp. 249-258, 5 figs. 

INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE 
1964. International code of zoological nomenclature. London. 
James, P. S. B. R. 

1967. Some observations on the fishery of Chorinemus lysan Forskal of the Rame- 
shwaram Island with notes on its biology. Indian Journal of Fisheries, vol. 
11A, no. 1, 1964 (1967), pp. 268-276, 3 figs. 

JeNyNs, LEONARD 

1842. Fish, 7 Darwin, Charles. The zoology of the voyage of H. M. S. Beagle, under 
the command of Captian Fitzroy, R. N., during the years 1832 to 1836. Edited 
L. Blomefield, London, part 4, xvi + 172 pp., 24 pls. 

JorDAN, DAvip STARR 

1917. The genera of fishes, from Linnaeus to Cuvier, 1758-1833, seventy-five years, 
with the accepted type of each. A contribution to the stability of scientific 
nomenclature. Stanford University, University series, 161 pp. 


VoL. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 253 


JoRDAN, DAvip STARR, AND BARTON WARREN EVERMANN 
1898. The fishes of North and middle America. Bulletin of the United States National 
Museum, vol. 47, part 3, pp. xxiv + 2183a-3136. 
JorpAN, Davin Starr, AND ALVIN SEALE 
1905. List of fishes collected by Dr. Bashford Dean on the Island of Negros, Philippines. 
Proceedings of the United States National Museum, vol. 28, no. 1407, pp. 
769-803, 20 figs. 
KLAUSEWITZ, WOLFGANG, AND J@RGEN NIELSEN 
1965. On Forskal’s collection of fishes in the Zoological Museum of Copenhagen. Spolia 
Zoologica Musei Hauniensis, vol. 22, pp. 1-29, 3 figs., 38 pls. 
LAcEPEDE, B. G. E. DE 
1800. Histoire naturelle des poissons. Chez Plasson, Paris, vol. 2, xiv + 632 pp., 20 pls. 
1802. Histoire naturelle des poissons. Chez Plasson, Paris, vol. 3, Ixvi + 558 pp., 34 pls. 
Linnaeus, CAROLUS 
1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, edition 10. Laurentii Salvii Holmiae, 
824 pp. (Not seen.) 
Major, PETER F. 
1973. Scale feeding behavior of the leatherjacket, Scomberoides lysan (Forskal) and 
two species of the genus Oligoplites (Pisces: Carangidae). Copeia, 1973, no. 1, 
pp. 151-154. 
MaAtTueERr, FRANK J., III 
1971. Seriola carpenteri, a new species of amberjack (Pisces: Carangidae) from tropical 
western Africa. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, vol. 84, 
no. 22, pp. 177-188, 3 figs. 
McCtiang, A. J. 
1965. McClane’s standard fishing Encyclopedia. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New 
York, 1057 pp. 
McCuttocu, ALLAN R. 
1929. A check-list of the fishes recorded from Australia. Memoir, Australian Museum, 
Sydney, no. 5, part II, pp. 145-329. 
MEEK, SETH E., AND SAMUEL F. HILDEBRAND 
1928. The marine fishes of Panama. Publications Field Museum of Natural History. 
Zoological Series, vol. 15, part 2, 331-707, pls. 25-71. 
Miter, Ropert R. 
1966. Geographical distribution of Central American freshwater fishes. Copeia, 1966, 
no. 4, 773-802, 5 figs. 
MirAnpdA-RIBEIRO, ALIPIO DE 
1915. Fauna Brasiliense. Peixes. Archivos de Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 17, 
pp. 1-765. (Not continuously paginated.) 
NELSON, GARETH J. 
1969. Gill arches and the phylogeny of fishes, with notes on the classification of verte- 
brates. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 141, art. 4, 
pp. 479-552, 26 figs., pls. 79-92. 
NorMan, JOHN R. 
1937. Coast Fishes. Part II. The Patagonian Region. Discovery Reports, vol. 16, 
pp. 1-150, 76 figs., 5 pls. 
NorMan, JOHN R., AND FREDERICK R. IRVINE 
1947. Marine fishes 7x F. R. Irvine, The fishes and fisheries of the Gold Coast. London, 
xvi + 352 pp., 217 figs. 


254 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


OsHIMA, MASAMITSU 
1925. A review of the carangoid fishes found in the waters of Formosa. The Philippine 
Journal of Science, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 345-413, 1 pl. 
Port, Max 
1954. Poissons. IV. Teéléostéens acanthoptérygiens (premiere partie). Expédition 
océanographique Belge Eaux cotieres africaines de l’Atlantique Sud (1948— 
1949), vol. 4, fasc. 3a, pp. 1-390, 107 figs., 9 pls. 
Quoy, JEAN RENE CONSTANTIN, AND PAUL GAIMARD 
1824. Zoologie [Poissons]. zm Freycinet, Louis de. Voyage autour du monde 
exécuté sur les corvettes de L. M. VUranie et la Physicienne, pendant les 
années 1817, 1818, 1819 et 1820. Paris, text chapters VIII and IX, pp. 183- 
401, atlas, pls. 43-65. 
RAFINESQUE, C. S. SCHMALTZ 
1810. Caratteri di alcuni nuovi generi e nuove specie di animali e piante della Sicilia 
con varie osservazioni sopra i medesimi. Sanfilippo, Palermo, 105 pp., 20 figs. 
1815. Analyse de la nature ou tableau de l’univers et des corps organisés. Palerme, 
224 pp. 
Recan, C. TaTE 
1903. On the genus Lichia of Cuvier. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 7, 
vol. 12, no. 69, pp. 348-350. 
RICHARDSON, JOHN 
1846. Report on the ichthyology of the Seas of China and Japan. Report fifteenth 
meeting British Association for Advancement of Science (1945). London, 
pp. 187-320. 
Risso, ANTOINE 
1810. Ichthyologie de Nice, ou histoire naturelle des poissons de Department des Alpes 
Martimes. Paris, xxxvi + 388 pp., 11 pls. 
RoFen, RoBerT R. 
1963. Handbook of the food fishes of the Gulf of Thailand. George Vanderbilt Foun- 
dation, Palo Alto, ii + 236 pp., 81 unnumbered pls. 
ROSENBLATT, RICHARD H. 
1967. The zoogeographic relationships of the marine shore fishes of tropical America. 
Studies in tropical Oceanography, Miami, no. 5, pp. 579-592. 
Roxas, HiArto A., AND ANTOLIN G. AGCo 
1941. A review of the Philippine Carangidae. The Philippine Journal of Science, vol. 74, 
no. 1, pp. 1-82, pls. 1-12. 
RUPPELL, WILHELM PETER EDUARD SIMON 
1828-1830. Atlas zu der Reise im nordlichen Afrika. Zoologie. Fische des Rothen Meeres. 
Frankfurt am Main, 144 pp., 35 pls. 
RUSSELL, PATRICK 
1803. Descriptions and figures of two hundred fishes; collected at Vizagapatam on the 
coast of Coromandel. London, vol. 1, pp. vii + 78, pls. 1-100; vol. 2, pp. 1-85, 
pls. 101-198. 
SAVILLE-KEnT, W. 
1893. The Great Barrier Reef of Australia, its products and potentialities. London, 
387 pp., 64 pls. 
ScHULTZ, LEONARD P. 
1945. The leatherjackets, Carangid fishes of the genus Oligoplites Gill, inhabiting Amer- 
ican waters. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, vol. 35, no. 10, 
pp. 330-336. 


Vor. XXXIX] SMITH-VANIZ & STAIGER: CARANGIDAE 255 


SHAW, GEORGE 

1802. General zoology or systematic natural history. Pisces, London, vol. 4, part 2, 

pp. x1 + 187-632, pls. 26-92. 
Smirnov, V. P. 

1936. Ryby severo-Kavkazskogo Oligotsena. Chernorechenskii raion (Fishes of the 
North Caucasian Oligocene. Chernorechenskii District). Trudy Uzbekskogo 
Universiteta, vol. 1, pp. 1-90, (Not seen.) 

SmitH, C. LAVETT 

1971. A revision of the American groupers: Epinephelus and allied genera. Bulletin of 

the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 146, art. 2, pp. 69-241, 41 figs. 
Smit, C. LAVeTT, AND REEVE M. BAILEY 

1961. Evolution of the dorsal-fin supports of percoid fishes. Papers of the Michigan 
Academy of Science, Arts and letters, vol. 46, 1961, pp. 345-363, 1 fig., 1 pl. 

1962. The subocular shelf of fishes. Journal of Morphology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 
3 pls. 

SmiTH, J. L. B. 

1949. The sea fishes of South Africa. Central News Agency Limited, Cape Town, 550 pp., 
103 pls., 1232 text-figs. (Also 1953, 1961, and 1965 editions.) 

1968. Studies in carangid fishes No. 4. The identity of Scomber sansun Forskal, 1775. 
Occasional paper, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, no. 15, pp. 173-184, 
pls. 38-39. 

1970. Studies in carangid fishes no. 5. The genus Chorinemus Cuvier, 1831 in the 
Western Indian Ocean. Occasional paper, J. L. B. Smith Institute of Ichthy- 
ology, Grahamstown, no. 17, pp. 217-228, pls. 40-42. 

STARKS, EDWIN CHAPIN 

1911. The osteology and relationships of the fishes belonging to the family Carangidae. 
Leland Stanford Junior University Publications, University Series no. 5, 
pp. 27-49. 

Suzuxk1, KtyvosH1 

1962. Anatomical and taxonomical studies on the carangid fishes of Japan. Report of 
Faculty of Fishes, Prefectural University of Mie, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 43-232, 
61 figs. 

TEMMINCK, C. J., AND H. SCHLEGEL 

1842-1850. Pisces im Siebold, Philipp Franz von, Fauna Japonica. Lugduni, 323 pp., 

143 pls. 
TorTONESE, E. 

1939. Risultati ittiologici del viaggio di circumnavigazione del globo della R. N. 
“Magenta” (1865-68). Bollettino dei Musei de Zoologia e di Anatomia 
Comparata dell’Universita. Torino, vol. 47, ser. 3, no. 100, pp. 177-421, 17 
figs., 9 pls. (Not seen.) 

Wakiva, YojIRO 
1924. The carangoid fishes of Japan. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, vol. 15, nos. 2-3, 
pp. 139-293, 38 pls. 
WEBER, MAx, AND L. F. DE BEAUFORT 
1931. The fishes of the Indo-Australian Archipelago, Leiden, vol. 6, xii + 488 pp., 81 figs. 
WHEELER, ALWYNE C. 

1958. The Gronovius fish collection: a catalogue and historical account. Bulletin of 
British Museum of Natural History, Historical Series, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 187— 
249, pls. 26-34. 

1963. The nomenclature of the European fishes of the subfamily Trachinotinae. Annals 


GOs 1 ~ «CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 
2 
and Magazine of Natural History, series 13, vol. 5, no. 57 (1962), pp. 529- 
Cyt ~*~ Se 340, 3 digs. 
Wurreneap, P. J. P. 
1969. The Reeves Collection of Chinese fish drawings. Bulletin of the British Museum 
of Natural History, Historical Series, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 193-233, 29 pls. 
WirITLEY, GILBERT P. 
1951. New fish names and records. Proceedings of the Royal Zoological Society of 
New South Wales, 1949-1950 (1951), pp. 61-68, figs. 8-10. 
WILLIAMS, FRANK 
1958. Fishes of the family Carangidae in British East African waters. Annals and 
Magazine of Natural History, series 13, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 369-430, pls. 6-16. 


lological Laborztory 
LIBRAPY 

TH 4 8 1973 
Weeds Acta, iviass. 


PROCEEDING 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 14, pp. 257-272; 4 figs. July 9, 1973 


CTENACIS AND GOLLUM, TWO NEW 
GENERA OF SHARKS 
(SELACHIT; CARCHARHINIDAE) 


iy 
L. J. V. Compagno 


Division of Systematic Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 


ABSTRACT: Two new genera are described for two species of carcharhinid sharks 
formerly placed in Triakis Miller and Henle. Ctenacis, new genus, is proposed for 
Triakis fehlmanni Springer, 1968. Gollum, new genus, is proposed for Triakis 
attenuata Garrick, 1954. Both genera are closest to Proscyllium Hilgendorf and 
Eridacnis H. M. Smith within the Carcharhinidae. Ctenacis is most similar to 
Eridacnis and somewhat less so to Proscyllium. Gollum is more distant from 
Proscyllium, Ctenacis, and Eridacnis than the latter three genera are from each other. 


Garrick (1954) described a peculiar new shark, Triakis attenuata, that in 
many features differs strikingly from typical species of that genus. Subsequent 
workers on Tyviakis, as Smith (1957), Kato (1968), and Springer (1968), 
accepted Garrick’s generic placement of ‘attenuata.’ In addition, Springer (1968) 
described another new species of Triakis, T. fehlmanni, that also differed greatly 
from the type-species, 7. scvllium, and its closest relatives. Springer regarded 
the generic position of ‘fek/manni’ as provisional pending a revision of Triakis. 

Compagno (1970) proposed a preliminary reorganization of Triakis. He 
removed T. leucoperiptera from Triakis and assigned it to the genus Hemitriakis. 
Proscyllium was resurrected for T. habereri and T. venusta and Calliscyllium 
were synonymized with it. Eridacnis and Neotriakis were previously synonymized 
with Triakis by Kato (1968), but Compagno revived Eridacnis for E. radcliffe, 
Neotriakis sinuans, and Triakis barbouri. Neotriakis was synonymized with 
Eridacnis. Following several previous workers, Compagno transferred Triakis 
henlei to Mustelus. 

Triakis, as restricted by Compagno (1970), contained a group of closely 


[257] 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


bo 
OL 
Co 


similar species, T. scvllium, T. semifasciata, T. maculata, and T. acutipinna, 
that seem to grade into Mustelus through intermediate forms as M. migro- 
punctatus, M. megalopterus, M. henlei, and M. dorselis. Triakis attenuata 
was considered to be probably distinct from Triakis proper but inadequate data 
on the species at the time precluded more definite generic assignment. Tviakis 
fehlmanni was treated as a doubtful appendage to Eridacnis that might merit 
generic or subgeneric distinction. 

Reconsideration of available data on T. fehlmanni indicates that this species 
should be separated from Eridacnis and Triakis in a new genus. Examination 
of two specimens of 7. attenuata confirmed my earlier opinion that ‘attenuata’ 
was generically distinct from Tvriakis and required a new genus also. 

The terminology used here for external morphology, vertebral counts, and 
dentition is from Compagno (1970). Clasper terminology follows Leigh-Sharpe 
(1921) and Compagno and Springer (1971). Terms for vertebral calcification 
patterns are from Ridewood (1921). Cranial terms are modified from Gegenbaur 
(1872), Allis (1923), and Holmgren (1941). 


Ctenacis Compagno, new genus 


Type spectes. Tviakis fehlmanni Springer, 1968. 

DEFINITION. Head very broad, depressed, its length 23 percent of total 
length in adult. Head length greater than distance between pectoral and pelvic 
bases. Snout outline subparabolic in dorsoventral view, not bell-shaped. Snout 
short, length 6.5 percent of total length. Eyes high on sides of head, above 
level of nostrils by a space about equal to eye height. Subocular ridge very 
strong, not indented on its dorsal surface. Eyes not visible in ventral view of 
head. Eyes elongate-elliptical, about 2.5 times as long as high. Nictitating 
lower eyelid rudimentary, with its edge horizontal. Subocular pouch very 
shallow, with its interior surface covered with denticles. 

Spiracles present, their length about 5 times in eye length. Shortest gill 
opening over “4 as long as longest. Gill rakers present on gill arches. 

Internarial space about 1.2 times nostril width. Anterior nasal flaps are 
broad, low, triangular lobes with fringed posterior edges, not elongated, barbel- 
like, or tubular. Posterior edges of anterior nasal flaps close to mouth but 
separated from level of upper symphysis by distance equal to % of nostril 
width. Posterior nasal flaps large, with fringed edge. No nasoral grooves. 

Mouth distinctly angular in shape, with edges of lower jaw nearly straight. 
Large papillae present in buccal cavity. Labial furrows extremely short, es- 
sentially confined to the mouth corners. 

Dignathic heterodonty weak, upper teeth with higher and narrower crowns 
than lowers at symphysis, lower teeth more comblike than uppers at ends of 
dental bands. No disjunct monognathic heterodonty. In both jaws teeth de- 
crease in size and height relative to root width towards rictuses. In the lower 


Vor. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: NEW SHARK GENERA 259 


jaw premedial cusplets increase in size and number and the primary cusp 
shifts postlaterally on the crown base towards the rictus, producing comblike 
posterior teeth. 

Tooth rows 86/88, series functional 4-5/5—7. Teeth not bladelike, without 
serrations or sharp edge. Premedial cusplets present on all teeth except a 
few in the region of the symphysis. Postlateral cusplets present on all teeth. 
Primary cusp present on all teeth, narrow, erect or slightly oblique. Crown 
foot with a strong basal ledge overlapping a deep basal groove. Transverse 
ridges present on all teeth, extending on to the cusps of uppers, confined to 
the bases in lowers. Roots of teeth broad, flat, low, platelike. No transverse 
groove and notch on attachment surface of roots. Teeth not extending onto 
sides and ventral surfaces of lower jaw. 

No interdorsal ridge, lateral dermal keels on the caudal peduncle, or pre- 
caudal pits. Length of head and trunk (from snout tip to vent) about 46 per- 
cent of total length. 

Denticles below first dorsal fin with crowns about as wide as long or 
slightly longer than wide in adult. Denticle crowns with a strong medial cusp 
and a pair of strong medial ridges; a pair of weaker lateral ridges are also 
present and a pair of very weak lateral cusps may be present or not. 

Pectoral fin skeleton projecting about %% of pectoral anterior margin length 
into fin. Longest distal radials of pectoral much shorter than longest proximal 
ones. Distal pectoral radials with parallel edges and truncate tips. 

Pelvic bases over twice as far from second dorsal base as from first dorsal 
base. Posterior margins, free rear tips, and posterior margins of pelvic fins 
not attenuate. Clasper morphology unknown. 

Midpoint of first dorsal base about twice as far from pectoral bases as 
from pelvic bases. Free rear tip of first dorsal posterior to pelvic origins. 

Second dorsal fin nearly as large as first, its height almost %o of height of 
first, its base length 1.2 times base length of first dorsal. Posterior margin of 
second dorsal weakly concave. 

Anal fin much smaller than second dorsal, its height about half of second 
dorsal height, its base length about * of second dorsal base length. Anal origin 
posterior to second dorsal origin by distance about % of second dorsal base 
length. Anal insertion under second dorsal insertion. Posterior margin of anal 
straight. 

Caudal fin without distinct ventral lobe, postventral caudal margin not 
notched or otherwise differentiated. Subterminal caudal margin about 4 of 
terminal caudal margin. Caudal short, not tapelike, dorsal caudal margin 23 
percent of total length. No lateral undulations in dorsal caudal margin. Ter- 
minal sector of caudal about 4 times in dorsal caudal margin. No caudal crest 
of denticles. 

Cranium with paired lateral and unpaired medial rostral cartilages, fused 


260 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


PREF oN 
FM oC  OCN 


Ficure 1. Ctenacis fehlmanni, U. S. National Museum 202969, 46 cm. adult female, 
neurocranium in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views. Abbreviations: AF, anterior 
fontanelle; BP, basal plate; CF, internal carotid foramen; EC, ectethmoid chamber; FM, 
foramen magnum; HF, hyomandibular facet; LR, lateral rostral cartilage; MR, medial 
rostral cartilage; NA, nasal aperture; NC, nasal capsule; NF, nasal fontanelle; NP, notch 
for orbital process of palatoquadrate; O, orbit; OC, occipital condyle; OCN, occipital 
centrum; OR, opisthotic ridge; OT, otic capsule; PC, preorbital canal; PF, profundus 
foramen; PR, preorbital process; PRF, parietal fossa; PT, postorbital process; SC, 
supraorbital crest; SF, stapedial foramen; SR, sphenopterotic ridge; SS, suborbital shelf. 


at their tips to form a tripod (fig. 1). Rostral node (conjoined tips of rostral 
cartilages) not yokelike, not penetrated by a rostral fenestra. Rostrum fairly 
short, length of medial rostral cartilage from its base on the internasal septum 
to the anterior tip of the rostral node about three times in nasobasal length 
(distance from base of medial rostral cartilage to the posterior edge of the 
occipital centrum; here used as an independent variable for cranial propor- 
tions). Distance between bases of lateral rostral cartilages about equal to length 
of medial rostral cartilage. Lateral rostral cartilages with their bases far an- 
terior to the anterior fontanelle and not connected to the dorsal edge of the 
fontanelle by a ridge. 

Nasal capsules oval-shaped, their long axis transverse to the longitudinal 
axis of the cranium. Transverse width of capsule from internasal septum to 
lateral edge of capsule about twice its length across its anterior and posterior 
walls. Greatest transverse width across nasal capsules about 1.3 in nasobasal 
length. Nasal aperture and nasal fontanelle apparently broadly continuous 
with each other, the fontanelle not separated from the nasal aperture by a 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: NEW SHARK GENERA 261 


LR 


lr OC OCN 


Ficure 2. Gollum attenuatus, DM-3636, 955 mm. adult male, neurocranium in dorsal 
(left) and ventral (right) views. Abbreviations as in figure 1, except: BR, basirostral 
fenestra; ECN, lateral ectethmoid condyle. 


Cm OR 


bridge of cartilage. Greatest width of nasal aperture about six times distance 
between nasal apertures across internasal septum. Ectethmoid chamber opening 
inside nasal capsule on its posteroventral wall, with its aperture just above 
posterior edge of nasal fontanelle and not separated from the fontanelle by a 
horizontal ledge beneath it. No ectethmoid condyles or subethmoid fossa. No 
ectethmoid foramen communicating between the ventral surface of the nasal 
capsule and the ectethmoid chamber. 

Anterior fontanelle subcircular in shape, its greatest width about 4.6 in 
nasobasal length. Cranial roof convex between orbits. 

No deep notch separating anterior end of suborbital shelf from nasal capsule. 
Basal plate expanded just posterior to nasal capsules into a broad suborbital 
ledge, the least width across which is about 1.7 in nasobasal length. Arterial 
foramina on ventral surface of basal plate include a pair of small internal 
carotid foramina about half as far from each other as from each of the 
stapedial foramina distal to them. The paired stapedial foramina, for the 


262 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Yi MR 


f 


or Shane a - 


= 
Re rm FG 1m 


Ficure 3. Triakis semifasciata, LJVC (writer’s personal collection) 0067, 937 mm. 
immature female, neurocranium in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views. Abbreviations 
as in figure 1, except: FG, foramen for glossopharyngeal (IX) nerve; FV, foramen for 
vagus (X) nerve. 


stapedial or orbital arteries, are tiny pinhole apertures. Basal plate nearly flat, 
without keels. 

Supraorbital crest present, connecting low preorbital and postorbital processes. 
Edge of supraorbital crest arcuate in dorsal view. Dorsal edge of crest not 
extending above level of cranial roof between the orbits. Width across nar- 
rowest part of supraorbital crest about 2.6 in nasobasal length. Postorbital 
processes not extending from supraorbital crest and sphenopterotic ridge, with 
tips not bifurcated. Suborbital shelf very wide, greatest width across it 1.3 
in nasobasal length. 

Otic capsules short, not greatly enlarged or inflated. Length of otic capsule 
about 4 in nasobasal length. Sphenopterotic ridge extending slightly lateral 
to side of otic capsule. 

Occipital condyles very small, without dorsolateral and ventrolateral plates 
that partially sheath base of vagus nerve. 

Total vertebral count 136 (1). Monospondylous precaudal (MP) centra 
28.6, diplospondylous precaudal (DP) centra 35.2, and diplospondylous caudal 
(DC) centra 36 percent of total vertebral count. Ratio of DP/MP centra 
counts 1.23, DC/MP centra 1.26. “A” ratio (length of penultimate MP centrum/ 
first DP centrum) 138, “B” ratio (length/width of penultimate MP centrum) 
114. No ‘stutter zone’ of alternating long and short centra in DP region. 
Last few MP centra not greatly enlarged. 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: NEW SHARK GENERA 263 


Vertebral centra without wedgelike intermedialia. Diagonal calcified lamel- 
lae present in form of knoblike projections from calcified double cone. 
Notochordal canal rather large, not blocked at apices of double cone. 

Spiral intestinal valve present, with about 10 turns. 

Mode of development not known, though possibly oviparous (see Springer, 
1968, for discussion). 

A color pattern of dark saddles, blotches, bars, and spots on a light back- 
ground present. 

Size small, the one specimen of C. feklmanni known at present being an 
adult female 46 cm. long. 

COMPARISON WITH OTHER GENERA. Ctenacis is a member of Compagno’s 
(1970) group of ‘scyliorhiniform triakoids, which are morphologically inter- 
mediate between scyliorhinids and genera such as Tviakis, Mustelus, and 
Hemitriakis. Ctenacis is most similar to Fvridacnis, somewhat less so to 
Proscyllium, and yet more distant from Gollum, the other new genus described 
here. All four genera show sufficient similarity in external morphology, denti- 
tion, cranial anatomy, and vertebral calcification pattern to form an apparently 
related group. 

For brevity comparisons of both Ctenacis and Gollum with other carcharhinid 
genera is here limited to the other ‘scyliorhiniform’ genera and to Tviakis- 
Mustelus, the generic complex to which ‘feklmanni’ and ‘attenuata’ were 
originally assigned. Both genera are not particularly close to carcharhinid 
from these genera by many characters given in the generic definitions. 
genera other than Proscyllium and Eridacnis and can be readily distinguished 

Eridacnis differs from Ctenacis in having a narrower head; anterior and 
posterior nasal flaps not fringed; tooth rows less numerous, 55—78/63—77; head 
and trunk slightly shorter, 38—43 percent of total length, and rather slim; pelvic 
posterior margins, free rear tips, and inner margins elongate, somewhat at- 
tenuate; caudal very long, tapelike, length 25-30 percent of total length; 
cranium narrower, width across nasal capsules 1.4—-1.6 in nasobasal length; 
nasal capsules nearly spherical; no diagona! calcified lamellae in vertebral 
centra; no striped and spotted color pattern on body; and size smaller, less 
than 370 mm. total length. 

Proscyllium differs from Ctenacis in having a narrower and shorter head, 
with length only 16-18 percent of total length; fifth gill opening less than 
half length of third; anterior nasal flaps very large, reaching nearly to upper 
symphysis; internarial space very narrow, nostril width 1.7—2.2 times inter- 
narial; anterior and posterior nasal flaps not fringed; tooth rows less numerous, 
46—62/49-59; head and trunk very short, only 39-41 percent of total length, very 
slender; first dorsal origin well posterior to free rear tip of pectoral; anal origin 
slightly anterior to second dorsal origin; cranium narrower, width across nasal 
capsules 1.5 in nasobasal length; nasal capsules nearly spherical; total vertebral 
counts 146-168 (6); and DP/MP ratio 1.6-1.8. 


264 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ctenacis is compared with Gollum in the account of the latter genus below. 

Triakis and Mustelus differ from Ctenacis in having external, transitional, 
or internal nictitating lower eyelids; no gill rakers or buccal papillae; anterior 
nasal flaps elongated and lobate; posterior nasal flaps absent or rudimentary; 
labial furrows long and extending well onto upper and lower jaws; lower teeth 
towards ends of dental band not comblike, with cusplets reduced or absent; 
roots of teeth usually subdivided on their attachment surface by a transverse 
groove and notch; interdorsal ridge present; longest distal radials of pectoral 
fin skeleton about as long as longest proximal radials or slightly longer; 
midpoint of first dorsal fin base about equidistant between pectoral and pelvic 
bases or definitely closer to pectoral bases; anal insertion slightly posterior to 
second dorsal insertion; anal posterior margin concave to deeply notched in 
adults; cranium with a deep notch separating the anterior end of the sub- 
orbital shelf from the nasal capsule (fig. 3); postorbital process exserted from 
the supraorbital crest and bifurcated distally; and vertebral centra with wedge- 
shaped intermedialia. 

In addition Triakis (including only 7. scvllium, T. semifasciata, T. maculata, 
T. acutipinna, and probably ‘Mustelus’ megalopterus and ‘M.’ nigropunctatus ) 
differs from Ctenacis in having an arcuate mouth (fig. 4C); fewer tooth rows, 
44—-65/34—56; and a well developed ventral caudal lobe in adults. Mustelus (in- 
cluding ‘Tviakis’ henlez) also differs from Ctenacis in having a longer snout, with a 
narrowly parabolic to almost angular shape in dorsoventral view and narrowly 
wedgelike shape in lateral view; teeth extending onto sides and ventral surface 
of lower jaw; teeth forming a regular pavement, with primary cusp typically 
reduced or absent in most species; a tooth peg present on the inner face of the 
crown; and ectethmoid condyles present on the nasal capsules. 

DERIVATION OF NAME. Ctenacis, from Greek ktenos, comb, and akis, point 
(feminine), in allusion to the comblike posterior teeth of this genus. 

SPECIES. Only one, Ctenacis fehlmanni (Springer, 1968). 

STUDY MATERIAL. The holotype and only known specimen of Ctenacis 
feklmanni, U. S. National Museum 202969. 


Gollum Compagno, new genus 


Type species. Tvriakis attenuata Garrick, 1954. 
DEFINITION. Head very broad, depressed, its length about % (21.3-21.6 per- 
cent) of total length in adults. Head length considerably shorter than distance 


> 


Ficure 4. A-B, Gollum attenuatus, DM-4841, 1015 mm. adult female. Prebranchial 
head in ventral (A) and lateral (B) views. C—D, Triakis scyllium, University of Michigan 
Museum of Zoology 179067, 700 mm. immature male. Prebranchial head in ventral (C) 
and lateral (D) views. 


265 


NEW SHARK GENERA 


COMPAGNO 


VoL. XXXIX] 


266 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc, 47TH SEr. 


between pectoral and pelvic bases. Snout with peculiar bell-shaped outline in 
dorsoventral view (fig. 44). Snout very long, preoral length 8.4—8.6 percent 
of total length in adults. Eyes high on sides of head, above level of nostrils 
by a space equal to about half eye height or slightly less. Subocular ridge very 
strong, with a distinct depression on its dorsal surface (fig. 4B). Eyes not 
visible in ventral view. Eyes elongate-elliptical, with their apertures about 2% 
to 2% times as long as high. Nictitating lower eyelid rudimentary, with its 
edge horizontal. Subocular pouch very shallow and covered with denticles. 

Spiracles present, their length about 3.8 to 8 times in eye length. Shortest 
gill opening “4 to 45 as long as longest one. No gill rakers. 

Internarial space about 1.8 to 1.9 times nostril width. Anterior nasal flaps 
short and subtriangular, not tubular or barbel-like, with edges entire and not 
fringed. Posterior edges of anterior nasal flaps close to mouth but separated 
from the upper symphysis by distance equal to % to “4 of nostril width. 
Posterior nasal flaps large, with fringed edges. Nasoral grooves absent. 

Mouth distinctly angular in shape, with edges of lower jaw straight. No 
large papillae in buccal cavity. Labial furrows very short, essentially confined 
to mouth corners. 

Dignathic heterodonty weak, virtually absent at symphysis but increasing 
towards ends of dental bands, where lower teeth are more comblike than uppers. 
No disjunct monognathic heterodonty. In both jaws teeth decrease in size and 
height relative to root width toward rictuses. In the lower jaw premedial cusplets 
increase in number and size relative to the primary cusp and the cusp shifts 
postlaterally on the crown in a direction towards the rictus, producing comblike 
posterior teeth. Gynandric heterodonty absent. 

Tooth rows 96—99/108-114 (3), series functional 3—6/3—7. Crown not 
sharp, serrated, or bladelike. Premedial and postlateral cusplets present on all 
teeth. Primary cusp present on all teeth, narrow and erect. Crown foot with 
a deep basal ledge overlapping a deep basal groove. Transverse ridges present 
on teeth, numerous and small, extending onto primary cusp and cusplets. Roots 
of teeth moderately high and deep, not subdivided on their attachment surface 
by a transverse groove and notch. Teeth not extending onto sides and ventral 
surface of lower jaw. 

Interdorsal ridge present. No lateral dermal keels or precaudal pits present 
on the caudal peduncle. Length of head and trunk about equal to tail length. 

Denticles from sides of body below first dorsal fin with crowns much 
longer than wide in adults. Denticle crowns with a strong medial cusp, a strong 
medial ridge or a pair of medial ridges, a pair of short but strong lateral cusps, 
and a pair of lateral ridges. 

Pectoral fin skeleton projecting slightly less than % of pectoral anterior 
margin length into fin. Longest distal radials of pectoral skeleton somewhat 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: NEW SHARK GENERA 267 


shorter than longest proximal ones. Distal radials with parallel edges and 
truncate tips. 

Pelvic fin bases slightly closer to second dorsal base than to first dorsal base. 
Pelvic posterior margins, free rear tips, and inner margins not attenuate. 

Dorsal edges of clasper groove not fused together between apopyle and 
hypopyle. A soft-edged, fleshy rhipidion present, with its dorsal surface ex- 
posed for most of its length and not concealed by the cover rhipidion. Cover 
rhipidion present, a small, short, square, fleshy flap. Exorhipidion present, 
a low, fleshy flap lateral to pseudopera. Exorhipidion without clasper hooks. 
A large pseudosiphon and pseudopera present. 

Midpoint of first dorsal base about 1.3 times as far from pelvic bases 
as from pectoral bases. Free rear tip of first dorsal well anterior to pelvic 
origins. 

Second dorsal fin about as large as first, its height equal or slightly larger 
than height of first dorsal, its base length equal or slightly less than base length 
of first dorsal. Posterior margin of second dorsal moderately concave. 

Anal fin much smaller than second dorsal, its height 44—46 percent of first 
dorsal height, base length about ' to *5 of second dorsal base. Anal origin 
posterior to second dorsal origin by distance equal to 11 to 27 percent of second 
dorsal base length. Anal insertion anterior to second dorsal insertion by distance 
about 25 to 36 percent of second dorsal base length. Anal posterior margin 
nearly straight, not deeply concave or notched. 

Caudal fin with ventral lobe poorly developed in adults. Postventral caudal 
margin not notched. Subterminal caudal margin about 7 to “40 of terminal 
margin. Caudal short, not tapelike, in adults about % (19.4-21.2 percent) of 
total length. No lateral undulations in dorsal caudal margin. Terminal sector 
of caudal between 3 and 4 times in dorsal caudal margin. A weak supracaudal 
crest of enlarged, circular or oval-crowned denticles present along the anterior 
half of the dorsal caudal margin. 

Cranium with lateral and medial rostral cartilages fused at their tips to 
form a tripod (fig. 2). Rostral node not yokelike, not penetrated by a rostral 
fenestra. Rostrum very long, length of medial rostral cartilage only 1.3 in 
nasobasal length. Distance between bases of lateral rostral cartilages about 2.7 
times in length of medial rostral. Lateral rostrals with their bases far anterior 
to anterior fontanelle but with their dorsal edges connected to fontanelle by 
a low ridge. 

Nasal capsule oval in shape, transversely elongated. Transverse width of 
capsule about 1.4 times its length. Greatest width across nasal capsules 1.4 
in nasobasal length. Nasal aperture and nasal fontanelle broadly continuous 
with each other, the fontanelle not separated from the nasal aperture by a bridge 
of cartilage. Greatest width of nasal aperture about 5 times distance between 
nasal apertures. Ectethmoid chamber opening inside nasal capsule on its 


268 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


posteroventral wall, with its aperture just above posterior edge of nasal fontanelle 
and not separated from the latter by a horizontal ledge beneath it. No true 
ectethmoid condyles, though a pair of low condyles are present on the postero- 
ventral surfaces of the nasal capsules (but well lateral to the position of the 
ectethmoid condyles of carcharhinoid genera that have them). Subethmoid 
fossa absent. No separate ectethmoid foramen on the ventral surface of the 
nasal capsule. 

Anterior fontanelle rhomboidal in shape, its greatest width only 7 times 
in nasobasal length. Cranial roof flattened between orbits. 

No deep notch separating suborbital shelf from nasal capsule. Basal plate 
expanded just posterior to nasal capsules into a broad suborbital ledge, the 
least width across which is about 2.0 in nasobasal length. Arterial foramina 
on ventral surface of basal plate include a pair of small internal carotid foramina 
about half as far from each other as from each of the tiny stapedial foramina 
distal to them. Basal plate slightly arched, without keels. 

Supraorbital crest present, with an arcuate lateral edge. Dorsal edge of 
crest extending well above level of cranial roof between orbits. Width across 
narrowest part of crest about 3.6 in nasobasal length. Postorbital processes 
narrow, exserted beyond supraorbital crest and sphenopterotic ridge, with tips 
not bifurcated. Suborbital shelf very wide, greatest width across shelves 1.4 
in nasobasal length. 

Otic capsules short, not greatly enlarged and inflated. Length of otic 
capsule about 4 in nasobasal length. Sphenopterotic ridge extending medial 
to sides of otic capsule. 

Occipital condyles very small, without dorsal and ventral covering plates for 
base of vagus nerve. 

Total vertebral counts 166 (2). MP centra 30.7, DP centra 35.6, and DC 
centra 33.7 percent of total counts. DP/MP ratio 1.16, DC/MP ratio 1.10. 
“A” ratio 129 to 141, “B” ratio 87 to 99. No stutter zone. Last few MP 
centra not greatly enlarged. 

Vertebral centra without wedgelike intermedialia or diagonal calcified lamel- 
lae. Notochordal canal rather large through apices of calcified double cones. 

Valvular intestine with a spiral valve having about 11 turns. 

Development ovoviviparous (Kato, 1968; J. A. F. Garrick, personal com- 
munication ). 

Ground color brownish gray dorsally, lighter below. No color pattern. 

Size small-medium, males mature at 932 to 955 mm. total length, females 
at 1015 mm. 

COMPARISON WITH OTHER GENERA. Gollum belongs to Compagno’s (1970) 
group of ‘scyliorhiniform triakoids,’ in which it is a singular and isolated member. 
Ctenacis, Proscyllium, and Eridacnis all differ from Gollum in having shorter 
snouts, only 4.3 to 6.7 percent of total length and not bell-shaped in dorsoventral 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: NEW SHARK GENERA 269 


view; no concavity or depression on the dorsal surface of the subocular ridge; 
gill rakers present; internarial space only 0.5 to 1.2 times nostril width; large 
papillae present in buccal cavity; fewer tooth rows, 46-86/49-88; interdorsal 
ridge absent; pelvic bases much closer to first dorsal base than second dorsal 
base; midpoint of first dorsal base much closer to pelvic bases than pectoral 
bases; first dorsal free rear tip over or posterior to pelvic origins; no supracaudal 
crest of denticles; rostral cartilages much shorter, medial rostral length 3 to 4 
in nasobasal length; no lateral condyle on posteroventral wall of nasal capsule; 
postorbital process not exserted from supraorbital crest; sphenopterotic ridge 
not medial to sides of otic capsule; and size smaller, not exceeding 700 mm. 
total length when adult. 

In addition Ctenacis differs from Gollum in having the head longer than 
the distance between pectoral and pelvic bases; second dorsal insertion over 
the anal insertion; distance across narrowest part of supraorbital crest greater, 
2.6 in nasobasal length; total vertebral count 136; vertebral centra with knoblike 
diagonal calcified lamellae; and a color pattern of dark blotches and spots. 
Eridacnis also differs from Gollum in having the head about equal to the distance 
between pectoral and pelvic bases or longer than it; posterior nasal flaps not 
fringed; gynandric heterodonty more or less developed, in males spikelike teeth 
present in one or both jaws at the symphysis; head and trunk considerably 
shorter than the tail; pelvic inner margins, free rear tips, and posterior margins 
elongate-attenuate; anal origin under second dorsal origin or slightly anterior 
to it; caudal very long, tapelike, with dorsal caudal margin 24 to 30 percent of 
total length; and total vertebral counts only 113 to 144. Proscyllium also differs 
from Gollum in having the shortest gill opening less than half as long as the 
longest; anterior nasal flaps very large, broadly triangular, and nearly reaching 
the upper symphysis; edges of posterior nasal flaps not fringed; head and trunk 
only 39 to 41 percent of total length; dorsal edges of clasper groove fused 
together between hypopyle and apopyle; exorhipidion very strong, with clawlike 
clasper hooks on its distal edge; first dorsal origin well posterior to pectoral free 
rear tip; anal origin slightly anterior to second dorsal origin; DP/MP ratio 1.6 
to 1.8; knoblike diagonal calcified lamellae present in vertebral centra; develop- 
ment oviparous; and a color pattern of dark spots and bars present. 

Triakis and Mustelus differ from Gollum in lacking a bell-shaped snout 
profile in dorsoventral view (fig. 4C); no concavity or depression in dorsal 
surface of subocular ridge (fig. 4D); nictitating lower eyelid external or transi- 
tional in young but usually transitional or internal in adults; anterior nasal 
flaps somewhat elongated; posterior nasal flaps rudimentary or absent; tooth 
roots low, with transverse groove and notch usually present; crowns of teeth 
towards ends of tooth band not comblike, with cusps and cusplets reduced or 
absent; longest distal radials of pectoral fin equal in length or somewhat longer 
than longest proximal radials; claspers without exorhipidion; anal fin insertion 


270 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


slightly posterior to second dorsal insertion; anal posterior margin moderately 
concave to deeply notched; no supracaudal crest of denticles; rostrum shorter, 
length of medial rostral cartilage 1.9 to 4.4 in nasobasal length; bases of lateral 
rostral cartilages not connected to edge of anterior fontanelle by a ridge; least 
distance across supraorbital crest 1.5 to 2.3 in nasobasal length; suborbital 
shelf separated from nasal capsule by a deep notch; no suborbital ledge between 
nasal capsule and suborbital shelf; postorbital processes bifurcated distally; 
sphenopterotic ridge above side of otic capsule or slightly distal to it, not medially 
situated; and vertebral centra wtih intermedialia and diagonal calcified lamellae. 

In addition Triakis differs from Gollum in having a thick short snout (fig. 
4D), bluntly rounded or obtusely triangular in dorsoventral view (fig. 4C) 
and bluntly rounded in lateral view; an arcuate mouth; very long labial furrows 
extending along margins of upper and lower jaws; fewer tooth rows, 44—-65/ 
34-56; and a well developed ventral caudal lobe in adults. Mustelus also differs 
from Gollum in having a snout less acutely wedge-shaped in lateral view; labial 
furrows usually longer, extending well onto the upper and lower jaws; teeth 
forming a regular pavement, with primary cusps and cusplets reduced or absent 
in most forms; and a true ectethmoid condyle present on the nasal capsule. 

DERIVATION OF NAME. Gollum (treated as a masculine noun), named for 
the antihero of J. R. R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy, to whom this shark 
bears some resemblance in form and _ habits. 

Species. Only one known, Gollum attenuatus (Garrick, 1954). 

STUDY MATERIAL. Dominion Museum (DM) 3636, 955 mm. adult male, 
from about 25 miles off Cape Brett, North Island, New Zealand; DM-4841, 
1015 mm. adult male, off Karamea Bight, South Island, New Zealand. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


Stewart Springer (National Marine Fisheries Service Systematics Laboratory, 
U. S. National Museum) discussed the generic classification of Ctenacis 
fehlmanni with me on several occasions both in person and in correspondence. 
In addition, he allowed me to examine the holotype of this species and dissect 
a ‘door’ in its head to expose the neurocranium. J. A. F. Garrick (Victoria 
University, Wellington, New Zealand) advised me on the classification of Gollum 
attenuatus and of additional specimens of this species collected since his original 
description. J. M. Moreland (Dominion Museum, Wellington, New Zealand) 
sent me two specimens of G. attenuatus. 


LITERATURE CITED 


ALLis, EpwARD PHELPS, JR. 
1923. The cranial anatomy of Chlamydoselachus anguineus. Acta Zoologica, vol. 4, 
pts. 2-3, pp. 123-221, pls. 1-23. 
Compacno, L. J. V. 
1970. Systematics of the genus Hemitriakis (Selachii: Carcharhinidae), and related 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: NEW SHARK GENERA 271 


genera. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, Fourth Series, 
vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 63-98, figs. 1-8. 
Compacno, L. J. V., and STEWART SPRINGER 
1971. Jago, a new genus of carcharhinid sharks, with a redescription of 7. omanensis. 
Fishery Bulletin, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 615-626, figs. 1-6. 
Garrick, J. A. F. 
1954. Studies on New Zealand Elasmobranchii. Part III. A new species of Triakis 
(Selachii) from New Zealand. Transactions of the Royal Society of New 
Zealand, vol. 82, part 3, pp. 695-702, figs. 1-2. 
GEGENBAUR, CARL 
1872. Untersuchungen zur Vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbelthiere. Drittes Heft. 
Das Kopfskelet der Selachier, ein Beitrag zur Erkenntnis der Genese des 
Kopiskeletes der Wirbelthiere. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. Pp. i-x, 1-316, 
pls. 1-22. 
Hortmcren, NIts 
1941. Studies on the head in fishes. Embryological, morphological and phylogenetical 
researches. Part II: Comparative anatomy of the adult selachian skull, with 
remarks on the dorsal fins in sharks. Acta Zoologica, vol. 22, part 1, pp. 
1-100, figs. 1-74. 
Kato, SuSUMU 
1968. Triakis acutipinna (Galeoidea, Triakidae), a new species of shark from Ecuador. 
Copeia, 1968, no. 2, pp. 319-325, figs. 1-2. 
LEIGH-SHARPE, W. HAroLp 
1921. The comparative morphology of the secondary sexual characters of elasmobranch 
fishes. The claspers, clasper siphons, and clasper glands. Memoir II. Journal 
of Morphology, vol. 35, pp. 359-380, figs. 1-15. 
RipEwoop, W. G. 
1921. On the calcification of the vertebral centra in sharks and rays. Philosophical 
Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Ser. B., Zoology, vol. 210, 
pp. 311-407, figs. 1-38. 
SMmrrHee|i i. B. 
1957. A new shark from South Africa. South African Journal of Science, vol. 53, 
no. 10, pp. 261-264, figs. 1-2. 
SPRINGER, STEWART 
1968. Triakis fehlmanni, a new shark from the coast of Somalia. Proceedings of the 
Biological Society of Washington, vol. 81, pp. 613-624, figs. 1-5. 


7 76 


Ce. 
oneagy tae 


Tee GW 


7 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEM 


ae 
OF SCIENCES 


FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 15, pp. 273-284; 3 figs. July 9, 1973 


CHEMICAL EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES TO 
FREE FOSSIL SILICOFLAGELLATES FROM 
MARINE SEDIMENTARY ROCKS 


By 
York T. Mandra 


Research Associate, California Academy of Sciences and 
Professor of Geology, California State University, San Francisco 


A. L. Brigger 


Research Associate, California Academy of Sciences 
and 


Highoohi Mandra 


8 Bucareli Drive, San Francisco, California 


Abstract. Techniques of extracting fossil silicoflagellates and other siliceous micro- 
fossils from marine sedimentary rocks are described. The extraction is achieved by 
dissolving and chemically disaggregating all the rock (or the cementing agents of 
the rocks) except the siliceous fraction, and by removing the nonfossiliferous fraction 
so that the fossils will not be hidden. 


INTRODUCTION 


This paper, while written primarily for micropaleontologists who work with 
silicoflagellates, can also be used by those who study other siliceous micro- 
fossils such as diatoms, radiolarians, ebriata, sponge spicules, and _ rocellids. 

It is our intent that this paper be a useful working tool for micropaleontologists 
who are not either chemists or geochemists. It is not intended to be a mono- 
graphic study, recording, comparing, and evaluating other techniques. Hence 

1 Silicoflagellates are defined here as marine, planktonic Mastigophora (Protozoa) with a pseudopodium, 
a flagellum, and a skeleton of hollow siliceous rods. These organisms also contain color pigment organelles and 


therefore are treated by some workers as plants (Algae) and by others as an animal-plant group (Protista). 


[273] 


274 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


no long list of prior papers dealing with this subject is cited. Papers omitted 
from our much abridged list have not been judged less worthy by us. Their 
omission results simply from our wish to present a short list. The reader who 
wishes to compare other techniques is referred to the following papers and their 
bibliographies: Mann (1922), Hustedt (1958), Hanna (1937), Burma (1965), 
Gray (1965), and Schopf (1965). The first four workers have techniques that 
are similar to each other, and similar to our techniques. However, there are 
sufficient differences between our methodology and the earlier procedures to 
justify making our data available to those who work with siliceous microfossils. 
Gray and Schopf deal with pollen, but their papers include some techniques 
and procedures that are transferable to the study of siliceous microfossils. 

Rocks that contain fossil silicoflagellates vary from friable (e.g. pure di- 
atomite) to well indurated (e.g. limestone). The techniques presented here 
can be used for all marine sedimentary rocks except those which have essentially 
the same chemical composition as silicoflagellates. Examples of rocks for which 
these techniques will not work are chert and jasper. Siliceous microfossils in 
these kinds of rocks must be studied by thin sections and polished surfaces. 
The reader is referred to any standard petrographic text for these techniques. 
They are not included here because it has been our experience that the study of 
silicoflagellates and diatoms by thin sections and polished surfaces is at best 
not satisfactory and, in most cases, not worth the effort. 


OBJECTIVES 


The purpose of this paper is to describe our techniques of extracting fossil 
silicoflagellates and other siliceous microfossils from marine sedimentary rocks. 
If the procedures given here are followed, all individual specimens of these micro- 
organisms will be relatively clean (i.e., no large particle of debris will be cemented 
to the specimens). 

These results are achieved by: (1) dissolving and chemically disaggregating 
all the rock (or all the cementing agent of the rock) except the siliceous fraction 
of the rock and the siliceous microfossils in the rock; and (2) decanting away 
the nonfossiliferous part of the rock so that silicoflagellates will not be hidden 
by these materials. In general only acids and other chemicals that do not attack 
siliceous microfossils are used, the one exception being the use of sodium hy- 
droxide (NaOH), which can dissolve silicoflagellates. However we use it as a 
dilute solution (0.25—1.0 N) and only for a relatively short time. No appreciable 
damage to silicoflagellates or diatoms by such use of sodium hydroxide has 
been observed. 

DEEP-SEA CORE SAMPLES AND OUTCROP SAMPLES. There is such a wide vari- 
ation in the lithology, mineralogy, and chemistry of marine sedimentary rocks 
containing fossil silicoflagellates that no one simple chemical extraction (or 


Vor. XXXIX] MANDRA, ET AL.: EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES 275 


simple generalized method) will be applicable to all marine sedimentary rocks. 
However, one generalization is possible: most deep-sea core samples are more eas- 
ily prepared chemically, as compared with most older Cenozoic samples taken from 
outcrops of well indurated rock. Therefore many steps of the procedure pre- 
sented here may not be necessary for deep-sea core samples. In contrast, a 
large number of important New Zealand Early Tertiary samples taken from 
outcrops consisting of well indurated rock and cemented by complex compounds, 
have taken as long as two weeks of continuous work per sample to prepare. 

NUMBER OF SAMPLES TO BE PROCESSED AT ONE TIME. If the worker has ade- 
quate experience and adequate equipment, and no problems develop, then six 
samples can be processed as a batch—at one time. However, at the sulfuric 
acid fuming? step only one sample at a time can be worked. Frequently we 
find that three or four samples are all that the most experienced worker can 
handle at one time. Again, this excludes the sulfuric acid fuming step, when 
but one sample should be handled. Furthermore it is not uncommon that one 
sample could be such a continous source of trouble that it should be processed 
alone. Beginners, for reasons of safety and efficiency, should work with only 
one sample at a time. 


DIRECTIONS AND COMMENTS 
Read each set of directions completely before you start to do each step. 


Rubber gloves, plastic apron, face mask, and goggles should be used at all times 
while handling acids or sodium hydroxide solutions or hydrogen peroxide so- 
lutions. Use a fume hood when working with beakers containing acids. 


if Place the rock sample which is to be prepared on a layer of newspapers. 
With a clean ice pick break a piece from each large fragment of the rock 
sample so that the material to be treated will be representative of the whole 
sample. The remaining untreated portion of the rock sample should be 
preserved for future study. Reduce all the pieces to about one-fourth inch 
in size with the ice pick. The maximum amount of the sample to be treated 
should be about 100 grams. 

After each sampling has been made, carefully roll up and discard the 
newspapers, and clean the ice pick. This procedure will prevent contam- 
ination of one sample by another. 

2, Label a clean 1000-ml. Pyrex beaker with sample number. Place about 
100 grams of the one-fourth inch pieces into the beaker. If the samples are 
accurately weighed, the abundance of silicoflagellates in the fossil plankton 
can be quantitatively determined. (Tappan et al., 1971) 


2In this paper we use the term “sulfuric acid fuming” in the sense of concentrated H,SO, which is 
boiling and decomposing to H,O and SO, white fumes. We do not mean “fuming sulfuric acid” which 
is H,S,O, (H,SO, with SO, in solution). 


bo 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Cover the sample in the 1000-ml. beaker with about 300 ml. of distilled 
water. Large beakers are needed because some chemical reactions can be 
quite vigorous. 

If a worker is familiar enough with the microorganisms in his source of 
tap water to recognize them as contaminants, if the mineral content of the 
tap water is relatively low, and if the expense of distilled water is a factor 
to be considered, then good tap water filtered at the tap could be used in 
many of the steps described in this paper. 

Place a heavy watch glass over the beaker and add concentrated, chem- 
ically pure hydrochloric acid (HCl) through the lips in increments of 10 ml. 
if effervescence is evident. If there is no effervescence, slowly add all 100 
ml. at one time. However, care must be taken because if the sample has a 
high calcium carbonate (CaCO;) content and if a large amount of hydro- 
chloric acid is added at once, excessive effervescence might result in a 
spill-over. 

Calcium carbonate will neutralize the acid, hence more HCl may be 
needed to insure an excess of acid after all the CaCOs has reacted. 

If chemically pure acids are not available to the worker and if expense 
is a factor in the operation, then technical quality acids could be used. 
However, because the chemically pure acids have smaller amounts of im- 
purities their use is recommended. 

The purpose of the HCl treatment is to dissolve oxides and salts (other 
than silicates) of metals whose chlorides are soluble. These soluble chlo- 
rides can then be decanted away. This treatment will work for most metals 
except silver and lead in the marine sedimentary rock sample. 

Place the beaker on a hot plate and keep the solution at a gentle boil 
until all reactions have ended. Suggested hot plate dimensions are: top, 
three-eighths inch thick, good quality stainless steel, 20 X 20 inches; 10- 
inch-high stainless steel legs; and 1'2-inch-high removable stainless steel 
railing to prevent beakers from falling off the edge. Heat should be sup- 
plied by two or three Meker burners. Rubber tubing should not be used 
because of the high heat. Tygon or other heat resistant tubing should be 
used, or, better yet, a direct connection with steel piping with valve control. 

Add distilled water to the beaker until half-filled, set aside until no 
microfossils are suspended in the solution. This should be determined by 
examination of a drop of the solution under the microscope at 100 X. 

Decant carefully so as not to lose any of the microfossils. Fill the 
beaker half full with distilled water. Cover with a watch glass and again 
bring the solution to a gentle boil. More soluble chlorides will now be 
taken into solution as will be indicated by the color of the water. Boil gently 
for at least an hour, cool, and examine a drop of the solution under a micro- 


Vor. XXXIX] MANDRA, ET AL.: EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES 277 


® 


uae % 


Ficure 1. Sample broken down with HCl and water, retained after washing on 400- 
mesh screen. 


scope at 100 X. If there are no microfossils in the solution, decant. If 
microfossils are still in suspension, wait until they settle, then decant. 

F Add distilled water to the beaker until half-filled. Remove the fine 
sediment by vigorously swirling the solution in the beaker so that the fine 
fraction (i.e. the decomposed and disaggregated material of the rock 
sample) goes into suspension. Then immediately pour off the solution with 
its suspended matter into another clean 2000-ml. Pyrex beaker marked with 
the sample number and an ‘A’, leaving the coarser material in the original 
beaker. 

Repeat step 5 several times until the solution in the original beaker is 
neutral to litmus paper. 

6. To the original beaker containing the hydrochloric acid-treated sample 
that is not yet decomposed and not yet disaggregated, add a solution of 
sodium carbonate NazCO; (50 grams per liter of distilled water) until 
the sample is covered with the solution. 

Heat slowly on the hot plate and gradually add a 30 percent solution 
of chemically pure hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). This must be done care- 
fully, a few drops at a time, because the reaction could be quite vigorous 
and some of the sample could be lost. Continue this careful addition of 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


FicurE 2. Sample fumed with H2SO;:, washed and retained on 400-mesh screen. 


hydrogen peroxide until 10 ml. have been added. Boil very slowly for 
30 minutes. Then remove the beaker from the hot plate to cool and allow 
the sediment to settle. 

The boiling with hydrogen peroxide helps to disaggregate the particles 
in the sample and also to oxidize the organic matter. The organic matter 
in the sample probably is the residue of plankton, seaweed, etc., partially 
decomposed and combined with other materials desiccated and oxidized 
while at outcrop. If the sample has not been exposed to the atmosphere 
(e.g. a deep-sea core sample), it will not be oxidized and desiccated; the 
organic matter will usually go into solution easily and chemical extraction 
of microfossils is simple. This is why we stated earlier that most deep-sea 
cores are relatively easy to prepare. 

If there are no microfossils in suspension, decant and discard the solution 
which is in beaker ‘A’. Test for acidity with litmus paper. If acidic, wash 
several times and decant until the solution is neutral. Examine a drop of 
the solution with the microscope at 100 X before each decantation to be 
sure that no microfossils will be lost. 

Decant the sodium carbonate - hydrogen peroxide treated fine sediment 
of step 6 into beaker ‘A’. Wash several times by swirling the original beaker 
until the fine disaggregated and decomposed fraction of the sample is in 
suspension. Continue washing and decanting until beaker ‘A’ is nearly filled. 


Vor. XXXIX] MANDRA, ET AL.: EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES 


ins) 
~ 
Ko) 


FicurE 3. Fumed sample treated with NaOH and H.O., washed and retained on 400- 
mesh screen. 


Then set beaker ‘A’ aside for the suspension to settle. Decant when the 
solution above the precipitate in beaker ‘A’ is clear. 

Place the original beaker which contains the undisaggregated material 
back on the hot plate and add about 400 ml. of distilled water. Bring to 
boil and keep at a low boil for about three-quarters of an hour. 

9. In most cases the sodium carbonate and hydrogen peroxide boiling at 
this stage should have decomposed or disaggregated most of the remaining 
cementing agents which have held the rock sample together. The boiling 
water in step 8 should have completely disaggregated the sample. 

However, there are samples that will not react, or will barely react, to 
this treatment. In such a case, after decanting the sodium carbonate solution 
into beaker ‘A’ cover the remaining undecomposed and undisaggregated sam- 
ple in the original beaker with a solution of sodium hydroxide (20 grams 
NaOH to 1000 ml. of distilled water) and carefully add 1 ml. of 30 percent 
chemically pure hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Bring the solution to a boil 
and continue the boiling for five minutes. Remove from the hot plate, cool 
and decant the solution and fine sediment into beaker ‘A’. Add 400 ml. 


10. 


dell. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


of distilled water to the remaining residue in the original beaker and boil 
for 30 minutes at which time the sample should be completely disaggregated. 
Remove from the hot plate, cool, swirl the solution, and decant the sus- 
pended matter and solution into beaker ‘A’. If at this stage undecomposed 
material still exists in the original beaker, dry it overnight in an oven at 
100° C. Label it ‘Partially Treated’ and store it in a container that also 
clearly records its locality data. 

All the fine material that has been separated from the larger pieces 
of the marine sedimentary rock sample is now in beaker ‘A’. Fill this 
beaker with distilled water and allow the solution to settle. Examine a drop 
of the solution under the microscope at 100 X. If there are no microfossils 
in suspension, decant and discard the solution. 

If in the acid treatment all of the metal ions have not been removed, 
they will now exist as reprecipitated carbonates or hydrates. To remove 
them, add 100 ml. of concentrated chemically pure hydrochloric acid (HCl) 
and 400 ml. of distilled water, cover with a watch glass and boil for one 
hour or more. Remove beaker ‘A’ from the hot plate, allow it to cool and 
allow the sediment to settle. Examine the suspended matter in the solution. 
If the microfossils have settled, decant and discard the solution. Continue 
to wash the sediment by repeated decantations until the solution is neutral, 
making sure that no microfossils are poured away. 

The purpose of this step is to reduce the bulk of the sample. Use a 
clean 2-inch-deep, 12-inch-diameter, 400-mesh all stainless steel screen, and 
a clean 10-liter bucket to retain the screened material. Before screening 
the material, wet the screen on both sides with water; if this is not done 
water will not pass through this fine mesh. 

Add water to beaker ‘A’ until about half full, swirl the solution in the 
beaker until the fine sediments are in suspension. Allow the heavier par- 
ticles to settle: a minute should be sufficient time. Then pour onto the 
screen a little of the suspended material while agitating the screen by gently 
striking it on the side with the palm of the hand. To aid the screening, 
use a plastic wash bottle so held that water will flow onto the screen. The 
plastic wash bottle should have plastic tubing in order to protect the ex- 
pensive screen against accidental contact with the tubing. Continue agitating 
and washing the material on the screen until the water passing through 
carries no more sediment. Do not use your fingers or any tool to force 
material through the screen as this will damage both screen and sample. 
Tilt the screen slightly and wash the retained material to the edge of the 
screen. With the wash bottle, carefully wash the retained material on 
the screen into the beaker to be used for the sulfuric acid fuming step. The 
beaker size should be either 400 or 250-ml. depending upon the amount of 


Vor. XXXIX] MANDRA, ET AL.: EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES 281 


12: 


13: 


residue remaining on the 400-mesh screen.* Continue this screening process 
until all the sample that is being treated has been washed on the 400-mesh 
screen and transferred to either the 250 or 400-ml. beaker. 

Because the screen openings of the 400-mesh screen are 38 microns in 
size, some small silicoflagellates and other small microfossils will pass 
through these screen openings. These microscopic fossils should be retained 
for study. However, it has been our experience that the —400 mesh fraction 
frequently does not contain many silicoflagellates. If there are no micro- 
fossils in suspension, decant the solution from the 10-liter bucket, dry its 
sediment overnight in an oven at 100° C., label, and store for examination 
and study. 

The +400 fraction which does not go through the screen will have un- 
decomposed fragments of the sample containing fossils that are smaller than 
38 microns. However, after completing all the steps these remaining speci- 
mens, smaller than 38 microns in size, will be freed and available for study. 

Clean the screen after use with a surfactant solution. If possible use an 
ultrasonic cleaning device. 

In this dangerous step the sample is boiled in sulfuric acid in order to 
dissolve organic cementing agents. 

After the microfossils have settled to the bottom of the 250 or 400-ml. 
beaker, decant the water. If the layer of the sediment is more than ™%-inch 
thick, use a 400-ml. beaker. 

Extreme caution should be used while the sample is subjected to the 
sulfuric acid treatment and a face mask and eye goggles should be worn. 
Place a heavy watch glass over the Pyrex beaker and with the aid of a 
pipette to which a rubber bulb is attached, slowly add small increments of 
chemically pure concentrated sulfuric acid through the lip of the beaker. 
These small amounts of acid should be run down the side of the beaker 
rather than added directly to the contents of the beaker. Agitate the beaker 
occasionally as the acid is being added in order to avoid any vigorous action. 
Continue the addition of sulfuric acid slowly until at least 150 ml. has been 
added, and the sample is covered with at least one inch of sulfuric acid. 
Rotate the beaker in an arc with the aid of beaker forceps to mix the acid 
with the contents of the beaker. 

Place the beaker on a ring stand over a Nichrome wire gauze and adjust 
the Meker burner so that it is about two inches below the wire gauze. This 
system is necessary because the previously used hot plate will not produce 
temperatures sufficiently high for this step. 

The beaker lip should be kept pointed away from the worker. 


3 The material that is retained on the 400-mesh screen is called the +400 fraction, and is read as ‘plus’ 


400. Similarly, that which passes through the 400-mesh is called the —400 fraction, and is read as ‘minus’ 400. 


14. 


15. 


16. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


If the contents start to bump, hold the beaker with the beaker forceps 
and swirl the solution with its sediment. This should minimize the bumping. 
If the solution becomes viscous, remove from heat and slowly and carefully 
add more sulfuric acid. Then continue heating. If the solution should start 
to foam excessively, slide the watch glass partially off the top of the beaker 
so that the solution is exposed to the air and remove from heat. As soon 
as the foaming has subsided, heat again. This tendency to foam generally 
lasts only a short time. Never add water to prevent foaming, because a 
violent reaction would take place. After white fumes appear, continue 
heating for about ten minutes. Then put the solution aside for about two 
hours until the beaker has cooled to room temperature. 

With the aid of a pipette to which a rubber bulb is attached, slowly and 
carefully add 10 ml. of concentrated chemically pure nitric acid (HNOs) 
to the fumed sample through the lip of the beaker which is covered with a 
watch glass, and again bring the solution to fumes over the Meker burner. 
The combination of the two acids will oxidize the sample and change the 
color of the sediment to white. Set this solution aside to cool to room tem- 
perature. Through the lip of the beaker which is covered with a watch 
glass carefully add small amounts of distilled water down the side of the 
beaker, a few drops at a time. Swirl the solution with beaker forceps after 
each addition of water until there is no reaction. 

Fill the beaker three-fourths full with water and allow to settle until 
the solution above the sediment is clear. At this point do not examine the 
solution under a microscope because of the high acidity. 

Decant carefully and discard the solution making sure that none of the 
sediment is lost. Fill the beaker three-fourths full with distilled water. 
Swirl the solution in the beaker as water is added to insure that the sample 
is being washed. Allow the sediment to settle and examine it under a micro- 
scope, as in earlier washings, for the presence of microfossils. Continue the 
washings, examinations, and decantations until the solution gives a neutral 
reaction to litmus paper. 

Add 100 ml. of approximately 1.0 N solution of sodium hydroxide* (40 
grams of sodium hydroxide per liter of distilled water) and two ml. of a 
30 percent solution of hydrogen peroxide to the solution. Place the beaker 
on a ring stand over gauze and adjust the flame of the Meker burner to 
give a low heat. 

Continue to use extreme care. Gently rotate the beaker holding it with 
beaker forceps in such a way that the heat of the flame contacts the outer 


4 NaOH will dissolve siliceous microfossils. Therefore a test was made in order to determine within what 


limits sodium hydroxide can be used. A solution containing 20 grams of sodium hydroxide per liter of water 
was placed in a beaker containing a sample of fossil silicoflagellates and diatoms and heated to dryness. 
Water was then added and the microfossils examined. There was no apparent damage to the fossils. 


Vot. XXXIX] MANDRA, ET AL.: EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES 283 


We 


18. 


edges of the beaker. Care should be taken to prevent the flame from coming 
in contact with the interface between the solution and air, for even a Pyrex 
beaker might then crack. As soon as the solution becomes warm the H2O2 
will start decomposing and bubbles of oxygen will become attached to 
particles of sediment in the beaker, eliminating to a great extent the hazard 
of bumping. Without the addition of hydrogen peroxide, bumping could be 
severe enough to cause loss of most of the contents of the beaker. Allow 
the solution to boil for two minutes. Remove from heat and allow the sedi- 
ment to settle so that the solution above the sediment does not contain any 
microfossils in suspension. 

The purpose of this sodium hydroxide treatment is to decompose the 
siliceous fraction of the sample that is cementing the sediment together and 
to decompose those siliceous particles that are adhering to the microfossils. 

Decant the solution and add 20 ml. of HCl. Cover the beaker with a 
watch glass and bring the acidified solution to a boil on the hot plate and 
continue at a gentle boil for about 30 minutes. Remove from the hot plate 
and cool. Decant after the sediment and microfossils have settled. This last 
decantation may be used to determine qualitatively what metallic ions are 
left in the sample. 

Add distilled water to the beaker, allow microfossils to settle, then decant, 
using the prior described precautions of not decanting any of the sample. 
Test for acidity. If acidic, wash again by decantation until the solution is 
neutral to litmus paper. The sample should now be completely clean. 

Nest three stainless steel screens 150, 250, and 400-mesh. This will 
yield four fractions: +150, —150 +250, —250 +400, and —-400-mesh. Such 
a division of the treated sample makes it possible to study specimens more 
effectively as well as to make better slides, because smaller specimens will 
not be obscured by larger ones. Pour the sample onto the top of the 150- 
mesh screen of the nested screens, which in turn are placed on top of a 
2000-ml. Pyrex beaker. The lip of the beaker will serve as an air vent. 
Wash each screen well with a wash bottle until little or no sediment passes 
through the screen. When no more sediment will pass through the 150-mesh 
screen, tilt it and carefully wash the sample with the wash bottle into a 
beaker marked with the sample locality description and ‘+150-mesh’. 

As the screening proceeds, check to see that the volume of water is not 
increased in the 400 and 250-mesh screens to a point of overfill. If this 
occurs, place the top two screens onto another clean, labeled 2000-ml. beaker 
and agitate the 400-mesh screen by striking it gently with the palm of the 
hand until it no longer contains water. Then place the 250-mesh screen on 
top of the 400-mesh screen and continue the process until the sample has 
been thoroughly washed and all the sediment transferred to properly marked 
beakers with distilled water. 


284 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Prepare the bottles in which the four samples will be kept by washing the 
bottles with distilled water, and attaching labels giving the locality data 
and the appropriate mesh number data (e.g. +150, -150 +250, —250 +400, 
and —400-mesh). 

Allow the fraction of the sample which has passed through the 400-mesh 
screen to settle for at least two hours. Examine for microfossils in suspen- 
sion. If fossils are in a drop of the solution, wait until they have settled. 
Then decant and carefully transfer this fraction to its bottle. Preserve each 
sample with the addition of four drops of 37 percent solution of formalde- 
hyde in bottles of approximately 30 cc. capacity. Fill bottles about three- 
fourths full with distilled water. Use leak-proof caps. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


We wish to thank Dr. Peter F. Linde, Professor of Chemistry, California 
State University, San Francisco, and Dr. Milka Zhivadinovich, Professor of 
Chemistry, California State University, Hayward for their critical reviews of 
our manuscript. 


REFERENCES CITED 


Burma, B. H. 
1965. Radiolarians, i7 Handbook of Paleontological Techniques. Edited by Bernhard 
Kummel and David Raup, pp. 7-14. Freeman Co., San Francisco. 
Gray, JANE 
1965. Palynological Techniques, 7x Handbook of Paleontological Techniques. Edited 
by Bernhard Kummel and David Raup, pp. 471-481. Freeman Co., San 
Francisco. 
Hanna, G D. 
1937. Invertebrates, 7x Methods in Paleontology. By Camp, C. L., and G D. Hanna, 
pp. 117-121. University of California Press, Berkeley. 
HusteptT, FRIEDRICH 
1958. Praparation und Untersuchungsmethoden fossiler Diatomeen, 7x Handbuch der 
Mikroskopie in der Technik, vol. 2, pt. 3, pp. 427-450. 
Mann, ALBERT 
1922. Suggestions for collecting and preparing diatoms. Proceedings of United States 
National Museum, 60, pp. 1-8. 
ScHOPF, JAMES 
1965. A method for obtaining small acid-resistant fossils from ordinary solution residues, 
in Handbook of Paleontological Techniques. Edited by Bernhard Kummel 
David Raup, pp. 301-304. Freeman Co., San Francisco. 
Tappan, HELEN, WILLIAM C. CORNELL, AND E. REED WICANDER 
1971. Quantification of fossil phytoplankton fluctuations. Abstract of Research, Fif- 
teenth Annual Report on Research, Period Ending August 31, 1970, American 
Chemical Society, Petroleum Research Fund, pp. 195-196. 


ariné Biological Laboratory 
LIBRARY 
AUG 2 11973 

Weéds Hala; Mass. 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XX XIX, No. 16, pp. 285-310; 10 figs.; 1 table. August 9, 1973 


TWO NEW SPECIES OF THE SCORPIONFISH 
GENUS RHINOPIAS, WITH COMMENTS ON 
RELATED GENERA AND SPECIES 


By 
William N. Eschmeyer 


California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, 
California, U.S.A. 94118 


Yoshitsugu Hirosaki 
Enoshima Aquarium, Fujisawa City, Japan 251 
and 
Tokiharu Abe 


Tokai Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory, 
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Katchidoki 5-5-1, Kyobashi P.O., 
Tokyo 104, and Zoological Institute, Faculty of Science, 
University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo 113, Japan 


Apstracr. A new scorpionfish, Rhinopias argoliba, is described from Japan. A new 
species name, Rhinopias aphanes, is given for a specimen identified as R. frondosa 
(Giinther) by Whitley (1964), and this single known specimen from New Caledonia 
is described and figured. Additional specimens of Rhinopias xenops (Gilbert) and 
Rhinopias frondosa are described. Rhinopias godfreyi Whitley is referred to the genus 
Pteroidichthys. The genus Pteroidichthys Bleeker is thought to be closely related to 
Rhinopias Gill. The monotypic genus Pogonoscorpius Regan, known only from the 
holotype of P. sechellensis Regan, possibly is a synonym of the genus Rhinopias. 
Remarks are given on the monotypic genera Hipposcorpaena and Pteropelor, both 
described by Fowler (1938) from juvenile specimens. Comments on shedding of ‘skin’ 
in these and other scorpaenid fishes are given. 


INTRODUCTION 


Specimens of the genus Rhinopias are very rare and are among the most 
striking of fishes in coloration and form. Species are known from the Indian 


[285] 


286 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ocean and the central and western Pacific Ocean. The two new species de- 
scribed here bring to four the number of species in the genus. The few speci- 
mens known previously have received considerable attention (Palmer, 1963; 
Smith, 1966; and others). We include with the descriptions of the new species 
information on the other two species, including new records, and offer comments 
on related genera and species. 

The Japanese specimen on which one new species description is based al- 
ready has had an interesting history. It was collected by Mr. Hajime Masuda 
and maintained alive in the Enoshima Aquarium, Fujisawa, Japan. This speci- 
men was depicted in color on the cover of Fish Magazine (1971) and it was the 
subject of articles on shedding of skin by one of us (Hirosaki, 197la-c). The 
second new species is based on a specimen which was first displayed in the 
Nouméa Aquarium in New Caledonia and was figured by Whitley (1964) as 
Rhinopias frondosa (Giinther). 

Shedding of ‘skin’ in scorpaenid fishes has received some attention, most 
recently by Hirosaki (1971a-c) and Wickler and Nowak (1969). Information 
is provided on additional genera of scorpaenid fishes observed to shed. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


We wish to express our sincere thanks to Mr. Hajime Masuda, Izu Ocean 
Park, It6 City, Japan, for his generosity and thoughtfulness. He provided the 
first and only known specimen of Rhinopias argoliba, allowing it first to be 
displayed alive in the Enoshima Aquarium, and second to be studied by us. 
We gratefully acknowledge the valuable services rendered by Dr. Chiichi Araga, 
Seto Marine Biological Laboratory (SMBL), Kyoto University, and Dr. Osamu 
Okamura, Kochi University (KU); they provided information and sent on 
loan Japanese specimens and color slides. Similarly, we are grateful to Mr. Paul 
J. Struhsaker, National Marine Fisheries Service, Honolulu, Hawaii, for provid- 
ing an unreported specimen of Rkinopias xenops from Hawaii and two speci- 
mens of R. frondosa from the Caroline Islands. We are grateful to Dr. R. Catala, 
Nouméa Aquarium, New Caledonia, for providing a color slide, photographs, 
and additional information on the holotype of R. aphanes. 

Funds from a United States National Science Foundation grant (NSF 15811) 
permitted the first author to visit museums. The following persons assisted 
the present study during visits: John R. Paxton, the Australian Museum, Sydney 
(AMS); M.L. Bauchot and Jean Claude Hureau, Museum National d’Histoire 
Naturelle, Paris (MNHN); Alwyne C. Wheeler, British Museum of Natural 
History, London (BMNH); Jgrgen Nielson, Zoologisk Museum, Copenhagen 
(ZMC); M. Boeseman, Rijksmuseum Van Natuurlijke, Leiden (RMNH); Adolf 
Kotthaus, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg (BAH); and the staff of 
the U. S. National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D. C. (USNM). 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 287 


M. L. Bauchot, Jorgen Nielson, and John R. Paxton loaned specimens. Alwyne 
Wheeler provided additional information for some specimens. Richard Krejsa, 
California State Polytechnic College, analyzed shed ‘skin’ from scorpionfishes 
for us. Pearl Sonoda, Tomio Iwamoto, Maury Giles, Kathy Smith, Kathryn 
Boyer, and other staff members of the California Academy of Sciences (CAS) 
aided the study. 

We wish to thank Lillian J. Dempster, CAS, for her help with literature, for 
her comments on the manuscript, and for assisting in the selection of new spe- 
cies names. K. V. Rama Rao provided comments on the manuscript. 


METHODS 


Methods of measuring and counting follow Eschmeyer (1969); exceptions 
to measurements commonly used to describe teleosts include the following: 
pectoral-fin length is measured from the base of the first ray to the end of the 
longest ray with the fin pointing back; measurements originating from the ante- 
rior end of the fish are taken from the most anterior point of the left pre- 
maxillary, and measurements are made on the left side of specimens. The last 
soft ray of the dorsal fin and anal fin is a double ray and the expression XII + 
9% is used to signify 12 spines and 9 soft rays (last double). Terminology of 
head spines follows Matsubara (1943) and Eschmeyer (1969). Abbreviations 
for depositories of specimens are given in the Acknowledgments section except for 
the following: EA—Enoshima Aquarium, Fujisawa. 


Genus Rhinopias Gill 
Rhinopias GILL, 1905, p. 225 (type-species Scorpaena frondosa GUNTHER, 1891, by original 
designation; monotypic). 
Peloropsis GILBERT, 1905, p. 630 (type-species Peloropsis xenops GILBERT, 1905, by original 
designation; monotypic). 

Remarks. The genus Rhinopias has about six months priority over the 
genus Peloropsis. The monotypic genus Pogonoscorpius Regan (1908), with 
the type-species P. sechellensis, may also be a synonym of Rhinopias. Pogono- 
scorpius sechellensis is still known only from the holotype (see our treatment 
of Pogonoscorpius). Rhinopias godfreyi Whitley (1954) is referred to the genus 
Pteroidichthys Bleeker. 

Diacnosis. Dorsal fin XII + 9%; anal fin II] + 5%; pectoral rays 15-18, 
some rays branched in larger specimens; scales on body small and cycloid, over 
60 vertical scale rows; head unscaled; vomerine teeth present; palatine teeth 
absent; vertebrae 24; body compressed; second suborbital bone becoming wider 
posteriorly, attached to preopercle; third suborbital bone absent; no slit behind 
fourth gill arch. 

SPINATION. Head spination is similar for all species. Most spines poorly 
developed. Nasal spines small, usually absent in one species. Preocular, supra- 


288 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


ocular, and postocular spines present; sometimes preocular and supraocular 
spines reduced; supraocular spine obscured by tentacle; postocular spine as 
broad shelf above rear of orbit. Parietal and nuchal spines well developed, 
joined. Sphenotic spine (as group of small spines) absent in some species. 
Pterotic spine well developed. Upper posttemporal spine small; lower post- 
temporal spine well developed. Supracleithral and cleithral spines rounded. 
Opercular spines blunt at tips. Tympanic, coronal, and interorbital spines absent. 
Supplemental preopercular spine present or absent. First three preopercular 
spines moderate, fourth small, fifth absent or barely perceptible. Suborbital 
ridge with four low spines or lumps, first on lateral face of preorbital bone, 
followed by one under front of eye, and two just before preopercular bone; 
sometimes these spines may be absent or poorly developed. Preorbital bone with 
2 poorly defined spines over maxillary (second and third preorbital lobes of 
Matsubara, 1943). 


Key TO THE SPECIES OF THE GENUS Rhino pias 


1. Pectoral rays 18 [17 and 19 should be expected]; no black spot or ocellus on soft 


@orsal “fin: 22 ee ee 2 
1. Pectoral rays 16 or 15 [17 should be expected]; black spot or ocellus present on soft 

Gorsalee tiny. eee ee ee meee ee 3 
2. Skin flaps absent on lower jaw; few skin flaps on body; third dorsal spine about 3 

times in head length and about two-thirds of snout Rhinopias argoliba (figs. 1-2A) 


2. Skin flaps present on lower jaw; head, body, and fins with numerous skin flaps; third 
dorsal spine about two times in length of head or less than 2 times if third spine is 


especially elongate, third spine longer than snout Rhinopias xenops (figs. 2B, 3-4) 
3. Body, head, and fins with round and oblong pale (dark rimmed) spots or blotches; 
sometimes almost entirely pallid in preservative — Rhinopias frondosa (figs. 5-7) 


3. Body, head, and fins with dark reticulations on a paler background —._________ 
paloek EDS Sets ee Repose, 


SPECIES ACCOUNTS 


Rhinopias argoliba Eschmeyer, Hirosaki, and Abe, new species. 

(Figures 1-2A.) 

No scientific name used, HrrosakI, 1971a, pp. 4-5, 2 figs. (shedding); 1971b, pp. 26-27, 
front cover, 5 figs. (shedding; cover in color showing live coloration); 1971c, p. 170, 
fig. (shedding). 

Inimicus didactylum (not of Pallus), AxELRop and Burcess, 1972, figs. 466, 470 (misiden- 
tification; poor color reproduction of specimen when alive in the Enoshima Aquarium). 


Hototyrr. Enoshima Aquarium no. 1 (129 mm. S.L., 167 mm. T.L.), 
Japan, Sagami Bay, caught off Izu Ocean Park, Ito City, at a depth of 50 
meters, 15 January 1971 [transferred alive to Enoshima Aquarium on 30 Jan- 
uary 1971, where it died on 23 May 1971]. 

Description. (Based on the holotype and only known specimen.) A large- 
headed, compressed scorpionfish. Dorsal fin with 12 spines and 9% soft rays; 


VoL. XX XIX] ESCHMEYER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 289 


Ficure 1. Rhinopias argoliba, holotype, EA no. 1, 129 mm. S.L., Japan; note white 
coloration below eye and above pectoral fin (from the specimen when alive). 


third dorsal spine not elongate, fourth spine the longest, eleventh dorsal spine 
about ™ the length of the twelfth spine. Anal fin with 3 spines and 5% soft 
rays; first spine slightly more than one-half length of second, third spine long- 
est. Pectoral rays 18, only one or two branched rays in each fin (branching of 
pectoral rays variable with size in other species). Gill rakers (including rudi- 
ments) total 23, 7 on upper arch, 16 on lower arch including one at angle, all 
rakers as short spiny knobs. Scales on body small and cycloid; about 80 verti- 
cal scale rows (count made a few scale rows above lateral line from above first 
lateral-line scale to end of hypural plate). Head without scales. 

Spination similar to that of other species of Rhinopias (see account under 
genus). Nasal spines small. Supplemental preopercular spine present, small, 
lying above first preopercular spine. Sphenotic spines absent in available speci- 
men. Suborbital ridge with 4 spines; first a sharp one on preorbital bone, fol- 
lowed by one under the eye and two lumps before the preopercular bone. 


290 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 2. A. Rhinopias argoliba, holotype, EA no. 1, 129 mm. S.L., Japan. B. Rhinopias 
xenops, USNM 209415, 107 mm. S.L., Hawaii. 


Measurements for the holotype in table 1. 

Tentacles on body few. No supraocular tentacle in available specimen; no 
skin flaps on lower jaw as in other species; small skin flaps on nostrils, on eye, 
on lower margin of preopercle, on some lateral-line scales, and a few very tiny 
ones on the pectoral fin. (The development of tentacles and skin flaps is some- 
what variable in scorpaenid fishes. See the ‘Comparisons and Remarks’ section 
below. ) 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 291 


Coloration in preservative almost entirely pallid (fig. 2); no reticulations 
present, no dark spot on soft dorsal fin. White stripe before eye slightly visible; 
some faint dark areas below eye (melanophores contracted). Color in life bright 
red, including all of body, head, and fins, with the exception of the white stripe 
before the eye, white patches near base of lower pectoral rays, a few scattered 
white spots on body and snout, one conspicuous spot about size of pupil just 
above lateral line over pectoral fin, and another spot on dorsal part of caudal 
peduncle. About 15—20 small (0.2—0.5 mm. in diameter) dark blue specks on 
head, most concentrated below eyes just above suborbital ridge. Spinous dorsal 
fin tipped with white. The white stripe (fig. 1) before the eye expanded into 
a circular spot at distal end (resembling an exclamation point |!]), ‘spot’ sep- 
arated from stripe on left side, partially joined to stripe on right side (see 
Hirosaki, 1971c, fig. on p. 170, or Axelrod and Burgess, 1972, figs. 466, 470). 

COMPARISONS AND REMARKS. This species is easily distinguished from 
R. frondosa and R. aphanes by having a higher pectoral fin ray count (18 versus 
16 or 15). The development of tentacles and skin flaps on the head and body 
is variable but presence on the lower jaw is a stable feature in species of other 
genera. Of the four species of R/inopias only R. argoliba lacks tentacles on 
the lower jaw. Rhinopias argoliba appears to be closely related to R. xenops 
with which it shares a pectoral fin ray count of 18. The holotype of R. xenops 
has the third dorsal spine notably elongate, but the additional specimens from 
Hawaii and two Japanese specimens do not, although the third spine is slightly 
elongate in two. In some scorpionfishes which have one or more dorsal spines 
elongate, this elongation is variable and does not occur until the fish reaches 
the subadult stage or even the adult stage; we do not know if this difference will 
be useful for distinguishing large specimens. The dorsal spines are proportion- 
ally shorter in the specimens of R. argoliba than in R. xenops. The second anal 
spine is shorter than the third in R. argoliba, but about equal in length to the 
third in R. xenops. Most fin spines are proportionately shorter in R. argoliba 
than in R. xenops. The pectoral fin in R. argoliba is shorter than in R. xenops. 
The holotype of R. argoliba is as large or larger than the known specimens of 
R. xenops but has fewer branched pectoral rays (2 or 3 versus 5 to 7). Branch- 
ing of pectoral rays in scorpaenids begins in juveniles and increases with increase 
in size to a maximum number of branched rays. The dentition on the premax- 
illaries is stronger in R. xenops than in R. argoliba. Differences in coloration 
of R. argoliba and R. xenops may be useful in distinguishing these species. The 
entire specimen of R. argoliba was bright red in life, including the head, body, 
and fins, with the exception of milky white spots on the body and the white 
stripe before the eye as given in the description above. The coloration in R. 
xeno ps is quite different (see account of R. xenops). 

We do not know what affect, if any, the 114-day stay in the Enoshima Aquar- 


292 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


ium had on the growth of the holotype of R. argoliba as might be reflected in 
unnatural lengths of some body parts. The only damage to the specimen seems 
to be that a callus formed at the symphysis of the lower jaw, caused by friction 
against glass. 

DisTRIBUTION. Known only from the holotype collected from Japan, off Its, 
Sagami Bay, at a depth of 50 meters. 

Name. The scientific name ‘argoliba’ (treated as an adjective) is from 
Greek, argos (white) plus lébos (tear or drop), alluding to the milky-white 
teardrop below the eye. The Japanese common name Namida-kasago is pro- 
posed and is based on “namida,” or tear, plus “kasago,” the Japanese name 
for Sebastiscus marmoratus. 


Rhinopias xenops (Gilbert). 

(Figures 2B, 3-4.) 

Peloropsis xenops GILBERT, 1905, pp. 630-631, text fig. 245 (original description; type locality 
Hawaii, Auau Channel, between Maui and Lanai Islands, depth 32 to 43 fathoms, 
Albatross station 3872, 12 April 1902; holotype USNM 51604); JorpAN and SEALE, 1906, 
p. 379 (listed; Hawaii) ; JorDAN and EvERMANN, 1926, p. 10 (listed; Hawaii) ; Fow er, 
1928, p. 287 (compiled description) ; 1938, p. 290 (listed; Hawaii); Tinker, 1944, pp. 
262-264, fig. (compiled; figure from Gilbert, 1905); Gostinre and Brock, 1960, pp. 284, 
286, 341 (in key; compiled); PALMER, 1963, pp. 701-704, pl. XX (in part; wrongly 
included Japanese specimens [Kamohara, 1942, et seq.]; compared with R. frondosa) ; 
GOSLINE, 1965, p. 825 (depth distribution; compiled). 

Rhinopias xenops, WHITLEY, 1954, p. 61 (placed in genus Rhinopias; distinguished from 
other species) ; SMITH, 1966, pp. 74, 77-79 (in key, distinguished from R. frondosa). 

Peloropsis frondosus, KAMOHARA, 1959, pp. 5-6 (in part; R. xenops in synonymy; thought 
R. xenops may be variant of R. frondosus rather than a distinct species). 

MatTertaL. USNM no. 51604 (1, 110 mm. S.L., holotype), Hawaii, Auau 
Channel, between Maui and Lanai Islands, depth 32 to 43 fathoms, Albatross 
station 3872, 12 April 1902. USNM no. 209415 (1, 107 mm. S.L.), Hawaii, 
Haleiwa, 21°39.6’ to 21°42’N., 158°07.3’ to 158°05’W., 41-ft. shrimp trawl, 
in 95-110 meters, Townsend Cromwell cruise 36, station 19, 3 May 1968. 
SMBL no. 7201 (1, 114 mm. S.L.), Japan, off Shirahama Town, Nishimuro 
County, Wakayama Prefecture, rocky bottom, 31 October 1971. SMBL no. 
7202 (1, 129 mm. S.L.), Japan, off Nambu Town, Hidaka County, Wakayama 
Prefecture, bottom gill net on rocky substrate, 31 January 1969. 

DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Preserved specimens mostly pallid; pectoral 
fin rays 18; no ocellus or dark spot on soft dorsal fin; vertical scale rows about 
70; skin flaps present on lower jaw. 

Remarks. The specimens reported here agree with the holotype in most 
features. The third dorsal spine is elongate in the holotype (fig. 3) but it is 
not especially elongate in the other specimens (figs. 2B, 4). The specimens agree 


in counts. All have 18 pectoral rays, rays 2—7 branched in the holotype (also 


Vou. XXXIX] ESCHMEVER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 293 


Z2 
PEE | 
CLO 


ZZ 
GAIT LL 
ERS 


Ficure 3. Rhinopias xenops, holotype, USNM no. 51604, 110 mm. S.L., Hawaii. 


the 9th on left side in the holotype), rays 1—7 or 2 through 6 or 7 branched 
in the other specimens. Gill rakers (including rudiments) total 21 to 23, 6(7) 
on upper arch, 15—17 on lower arch. Vertical scale rows number about 70-75, 
and lateral line scales 22 or 23. Head spination as for the genus. Nasal spines 
small. Supplemental preopercular spine present, small. Sphenotic spines absent 
or small. 

An extensive color description was given by Gilbert (1905, p. 631) as follows: 


“Head, body, and fins bright vermilion, upper parts of head and body darkened with 
olive tint, and with small scattered purplish spots, which are also found on upper half 
of pectoral fin; head, lower parts of body, and fins mottled with yellowish-white; 
flaps and tentacles narrowly edged with bright lemon-yellow; a large blackish blotch 
below eye, one on opercle and one at base of pectoral; a conspicuous broad, yellowish 
white bar on each side of compressed part of rostrum; three groups of brownish spots 
along base of dorsal fins; conspicuous white spots on back of tail and at base of 
eighth and ninth dorsal spines; a larger blotch below the latter just above lateral line.” 


No information on fresh coloration is available for the additional specimen from 
Hawaii. A Kodachrome slide of a Japanese specimen (SMBL 7202) revealed 
the following: body and head mostly orange-red; small purplish specks on 
upper part of head and body; large patch of white on body below dorsal spines 


294 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH Ser. 


Ficure 4. Rhinopias xenops. A. SMBL no. 7201, 114 mm. S.L., Japan. B. SMBL no. 
7202, 129 mm. S.L., Japan. 


7-10, with a smaller white spot just above lateral line below this large white 
patch; other white patches on head, pectoral fin, and scattered on body; small, 
tapering pale stripe leading forward and down from eye. The coloration of the 
Japanese specimen is similar to that given by Gilbert for the holotype with a 
few exceptions. The Japanese specimen had more orange and less red pigment 
on the head and body and lacked most of the lemon-yellow pigmentation as 
found by Gilbert. Some differences may result from occurrence at different 


VoL. XX XIX] ESCHMEYER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 295 


depths; the Japanese specimen was on display in an aquarium when photo- 
graphed while Gilbert’s description was taken from the holotype recovered from 
32-43 fathoms. Dusky patches were similar as evidenced by the preserved 
condition. The major features of the distribution of white patches were very 
similar. 

Coloration in preservative (figs. 2B, 3-4) for all specimens is basically 
similar, the most conspicuous feature being the dusky pigment at the base of 
the soft dorsal fin. 

Measurements are given in table 1. 

DIsTRIBUTION. Rhinopias xenops is now known from Hawaii and Japan. 
Previous records of this species from Japan were based on specimens of R. 
frondosa. Depths of capture for the Hawaiian specimens were between 32 and 
43 fathoms and between 52 and 60 fathoms. Depths of capture for the Japanese 
specimens are not available, but they were captured offshore. Habitat appears 
to be rocky or coralline areas. 

Name. ‘Nise-boro-kasago’ is proposed as the Japanese common name, from 
‘nise’ (pseudo) + ‘boro’ (ragged or tattered) + ‘kasago’ (Sebastiscus marmor- 
atus or similar fish). Boro-kasago is the Japanese name for Rhinopias frondosa. 


Rhinopias frondosa (Giinther). 
(Figures 5-7.) 


Scorpaena frondosa GUNTHER, 1891, pp. 482-483, pl. XXXIX (original description; type 
locality Mauritius; holotype BMNH 1891.4.30.3). 

Peloropsis xenops (not of Gilbert), Kamowara, 1942, pp. 27-28, fig. 1 (description; differences 
between his specimens and the holotype of R. xenops; two specimens from Shirahama, 
Wakayama Prefecture, Japan) ; 1950, p. 219, fig. 165 (compiled; figure from Kamohara, 
1942). 

Peloropsis frondosa, DERANIYAGALA, 1952, p. 109, pl. 32 (specimen from Ceylon; figure 
poor; lengths and body proportions incorrect [see SMITH, 1966, p. 77]). 

Peloropsis frondosus, Munro, 1955, p. 250, pl. 48, fig. 726 (compiled; figure copied from 
Deraniyagala, 1952); Kamonara, 1959, pp. 5-6, fig. 2 (description; one specimen from 
Susaki Fish Market; figure from Kamohara, 1942); 1964, pp. 73-74, fig. 47 (listed; 
Kochi Prefecture, Japan; figure from Kamohara, 1942) ; FouRMANoIR and NHU-NHUNG, 
1965, p. 93, fig. 59 (two specimens from Viet Nam; line drawing) ; FourRMANoIR and 
GuEkzE, 1966, pp. 56-57, fig. III d (Reunion Island, 90 m.) 

Rhinopias frondosa, SmirH, 1957, p. 62, pl. 4, fig. C (compiled; copied from Giinther) ; 
PALMER, 1963, pp. 701-704, pl. XX (summary of earlier records of Rhinopias; treated 
R. xenops and R. frondosa as separate species; radiographs of R. xenops and R. frondosa) ; 
KotrHaus, 1966, p. 122 (figure of a specimen from the northern Indian Ocean) ; SMITH, 
1966, pp. 74-79, fig. B on pl. 14 (synonymy; description; new record for South African 
waters; summary of earlier knowledge on R. xenops and R. frondosa and differences 
between them; retouched photo of a 45 mm. S.L. specimen). 


MatTERIAL. BMNH no. 1891.4.30.3 (1, 146 mm. S.L., holotype), Mauritius, 


collected by Robillard. MNHN 1967-550 (1, 79.5 mm. S.L.), Reunion Island. 
BAH uncat. (1, 145 mm. S.L.), off Somalia, 6°06’ to 6°03’N., 49°05’ to 49°03’E., 


296 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 5. Rhinopias frondosa, holotype, BMNH no. 1891.4.30.3, 146 mm. S.L., Mauritius 
(from Giinther, 1891, pl. 39). 


in 55-65 meters, Meteor station 123. KU no. 8465 (1, 152 mm. S.L.), Japan, 
Kochi Prefecture, Susaki Fish Market, 12 March 1959. SMBL no. 7203 (1, 
127 mm. S.L.), Japan, Nambu Town, Hidaka County, Wakayama Prefecture, 
gill-net on rocky bottom, 17 January 1959. SMBL no. 7204 (1, 146 mm. S.L.), 
Japan, off Iwashiro, Hidaka County, Wakayama Prefecture, lobster gill-net 
on rocky bottom, 18 April 1959. USNM no. 209416 (1, 103 mm. S.L.) and 
CAS no. 15320 (1,115 mm. S. L.), Caroline Islands, Condor Reef, in 30 fathoms, 
12.5-m. shrimp trawl, Townsend Cromwell Cruise 57, 24 May 1972. 

DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Pectoral rays 16 (rarely 15, but 17 rays would 
not be unusual); dark spot on membrane of soft dorsal fin between rays 7-9, 
sometimes more restricted; body and fins of preserved specimens covered with 
large brown circles or with pale spots or oblong blotches on light brown back- 
ground, vertical scale rows about 70-75; skin flaps present on lower jaw. 

Remarks. The known specimens up until now of this species have been 
reviewed in two articles (Palmer, 1963; Smith, 1966). Both authors reached 
the conclusion that R. frondosa is distinct from R. xenops. The color patterns 
of all the known preserved specimens of R. frondosa are similar except for one 
from Nouméa reported on by Whitley (1964, p. 9, pl. IT). The Nouméa speci- 
men is felt by us to represent a separate species and is treated as a new species, 
R. aphanes, in a separate section of this paper. 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEVER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 297 


FicurE 6. Rhinopias frondosa. A. KU no. 8465, 152 mm. S.L., Japan. B. MNHN no. 
1967-550, 79.5 mm. S.L., Reunion Island. 


Measurements and counts are presented in table 1. The holotype, speci- 
mens from Japan, Reunion Island, and the Caroline Islands are figured (figs. 
5-7). 

Color slides provided by Dr. Araga of 2 Japanese aquarium specimens (both 
about 230 mm. T.L.) revealed the following: specimen 1 with body, head, and 
fins reddish pink (approaching maroon); all of specimen covered with mostly 


298 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Tasie 1. Counts and measurements for specimens of the genus Rhinopias. (Measurements 
are in mm.; percent standard length in parentheses; see Materials Examined for catalog num- 
bers and locality information; holotype marked with an asterisk.) 


: R. xenops se R. 

R. argoliba aphanes frondosa 
Standard length 129* 107 110* 114 129 178* 79.5 
Dorsal rays XII-+9% XII-+9% XII-+9% XII-+-9% XII-+9% XII-+9% XII-+9% 
Anal rays TWI-+5% WI-+5% I-+5% I11-+5% Ii-+5% TWi-+5% Ii+5% 
Pectoral rays 18-18 18-18 18+18 18-418 18-208 (ios Simonetta 
Gill rakers 7416 6415 6416 6417 6-7--16 “S6-oIe ero ons 
Vertebrae 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 
Vertical scale rows 80 70 68 76 73 70 — 

(approximate) 

Head length 59.5(46) 51.7(48) 51.2(46) 53.9(47) 60.1(47) 85.5(48) 36.8(46) 
Body depth 55.2(43) 45.7(43) 48.7(44) 47.4(42) 53.3(41) 82.1(46) 35.0(44) 
Orbit diameter 10.3(08) 9.5(09) 10.0(09) 10.0(09) 11.1(09) 13.5(07) 7.0(09) 
Snout length 26.5(21) 21.1(20) 20.6(19) 22.2(19) 25.6(20) 40.0(22) 14.8(19) 
Interorbital width 5.8(04) 4.4(04) 5.3(05) 4.5(04) 6.0(05) 10.5(06)  4.2(05) 
Jaw length 29.5(23) 26.4(25) 26.4(24) 28.4(25) 31.2(24) 42.0(24) 16.9(21) 
Predorsal-fin length 47.7(37) 40.7(38) 42.2(38) 45.6(40) 48.8(38) 74.1(42) 29.3(37) 
Caudal fin length 32.6(25) — — 33.6(29) 38.6(30) 52.6(30) 30.5(38) 
Pectoral fin length 37.5(29) 33.3(31) 39.9(36) 42.2(37) 45.6(35) 67.7(38) 30.3(38) 
Pelvic fin length 29.2(23) 29.3(27) 33.6(30) 31.3(27) 33.2(26) 49.3(28) 23.9(30) 
Length 1st anal spine 9.6(07) 11.6(11) 13.2(12) 10.6(09) 13.2(10) 16.1(09) 8.7(11) 


Length 2nd anal spine 17.2'(13)) 225021). 22/6(21)| 23:0(20)) 2417) 2851s) eet ets)) 
Length 3rd anal spine 20:0(116)' 21-420)" 222721), 217/19) 21S) SZ 14D) Sent) 
Length 3rd dorsalspine 20.3(16) 25.2(24) 40.0(36) 34.7(30) 35.3(27) 41.7(23) 22.6(28) 


Length 4th dorsalspine 21.2(16) 25.8(24) 31.2(27) 32.8(29) 30.9(24) — 24.9(31) 
Length 11th dorsalspine 11.7(09) — — 12.1(11) 11.7(09) 8.5(05)  6.3'(08) 
Length 12th dorsal spine 12.2(10) -- — 16.3(14) 16.8(13) 21.9(12) 13.6(17) 


circular white spots or blotches, but with central area of blotches or spots usually 
colored same as body; pigment around edges of these pale areas slightly darker 
than surrounding areas; some small pale blotches between larger circular areas. 
Specimen 2 with more pink on fins and tentacles, and with head and body more 
brownish red. Transparent, oblong areas between upper pectoral rays at about 
midheight of fin visible in specimen two. Kamohara (1959) reported that the 
body (our KU 8465, 152 mm. S.L.) was uniform reddish; head bluish, lower 
parts of body and fins mottled with white, and black blotch on membrane be- 
tween seventh and eighth dorsal rays. Smith (1966, p. 77, pl. 14B) reported 
the coloration of his 45 mm. S.L. specimen as follows: 


“Colour in life. . milky yellow, with orange tinge over the opercle. The body is 
covered with thin brown lines forming irregular loops of varying size and shape. The 
iridal flaps are almost black, giving a radial effect. There are a few prominent dark 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEVER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 299 
TABLE 1 (Continued) 
R. frondosa (continued) 
Standard length 103 115 127 145 146* 146 152 
Dorsal rays XII+9% XII-+9% XII+9% XII-+9% XII-+9'% XII-+9'% XII+91%4 
Anal rays T-+5% WWI-+5% WI-+5% WI+5% I1+5% WI+5% IlI+5% 
Pectoral rays 16+16 16+16 16+16 16+16 16+16 16+16 16+16 
Gill rakers 6+15 6+15 7+15 —- 6+15 6-7+15 6+14 
Vertebrae 24 24 24 --= 24 24 24 
Vertical scale rows 70-75 U2 -- -= — 75 75 
(approximate) 

Head length 46.3(45) 57.1(50) 59.0(46) 65.3(45) 66.6(46) 68.0(46) 67.3(44) 
Body depth 46.8(45) 59.6(52) 61.6(48) 66.3(46) 66.8(46) 69.8(48) 70.7(46) 
Orbit diameter 8.2(08) 11.2(10) 10.3(08) 11.4(08) 12.4(08) 13.0(09) 12.0(08) 
Snout length 20.5(20) 23.8(21) 26.6(21) 30.2(21) 29.9(20) 28.9(20) 29.1(19) 
Interorbital width 6.3(06) 7.7(07) 8.3(06) 8.0(06) 8.6(06) 9.7(07) 8.3(06) 
Jaw length 20.5(20) 26.0(23) 25.8(20) 30.1(21) 30.8(21) 30.7(21) 32.1(21) 
Predorsal-fin length 37.6(36) 46.2(40) 47.8(38) 50.6(35) 58.0(40) 56.5(39) 56.4(37) 
Caudal fin length 35.7(35) 43.7(38) 41.9(33) 48.0(33) 49.0(34) 47.4(32) 48.5(32) 
Pectoral fin length 37.3(36) 48.4(42) 47.4(38) 49.5(34) 49.5(34) 53.9(37) 55.1(36) 
Pelvic fin length 26.2(25) 32.3(28) 33.4(26) 39.2(27) 42.1(29) 40.3(28) 37.8(25) 
Length 1st anal spine 8.4(08) 9.3(08)  8.8(07) — 10.5(07) 11.2(08) 10.0(07) 
Length 2nd anal spine IBLOKALS) UWS SGEDY aS (CI) --- 19.0(13) 17.8(12) 17.9(12) 
Length 3rd anal spine 16.3(16) 18.5(16) 17.1(13) — 21.7(15) 20.9(14) 21.7(14) 
Length 3rd dorsal spine 27.4(27) 39.7(34) 38.0(30) — AG NGD) EVO Sees) 
Length 4th dorsal spine 27.5(27) 38.6(34) 33.0(26) —_— 53.0(36) 47.7(33) 36.2(24) 
Length 11th dorsal spine 5.3(05) 5.8(05) 6.2(05) — 9.0(06) 9.7(07) 7.8(05) 
Length 12th dorsal spine 13.6(13) 18.2(16) 17.1(14) — 19.0(13) 24.4(17) 20.4(14) 


1 Broken at tip. 


marks on the fins, one rectangular, low, between the 5—6th dorsal spines, one, smaller, 
behind the base of the ninth dorsal spine, one across the upper part of the second 
dorsal ray, a small one on the upper and another at the lower part of the caudal. 
The largest is low down between the seventh and eighth dorsal rays, and the smallest 
(but distinct) between the apices of the first and second (upper) rays of the pectoral 


fin.” 


Deraniyagala (1952, pl. 32) illustrates a 126-mm. T.L. specimen as mostly 
orange-red. The general body coloration appears to change from mostly yel- 
low in small specimens to mostly red or crimson in large specimens. Our speci- 
men from Reunion Island (fig. 6B) has the dark pigment most concentrated 
in the areas mentioned by Smith as prominent dark marks. The retention in 
preservative of the dark, mostly circular lines (outlining the pale areas) is vari- 
able (figs. 5-7) and seems to depend on the amount of black or brown pigment 


300 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 7. Rhinopias frondosa, CAS 15320, 115 mm. S.L., Caroline Islands. 


present initially and perhaps on the method of preservation. Kotthaus (1966, 
pl. 22) provides an excellent figure of a 145-mm. S.L. specimen. 

Spination as for the genus. Nasal spines usually absent. Supplemental pre- 
opercular spine absent or poorly developed. Sphenotic spines present. 

The reader is referred to the papers cited above for a detailed description of 
R. frondosa. 

DiIstRIBUTION. Rhinopias frondosa is known from Mauritius, Reunion 
Island, Natal, Somalia, the Arabian Sea, Ceylon, Vietnam, Japan, and the 
Caroline Islands. Few depths of capture are available: dredged in 13 meters 
in Ceylon (Deraniyagala, 1952); in 55-65 meters off Somalia, in 90 meters at 
Reunion, and in 55 meters at the Caroline Islands. Habitat is rocky or coralline 
areas. 

Name. The Japanese name ‘Boro-kasago’ has been used for this species; 
from ‘boro’ (ragged or tattered) + ‘kasago’ (Sebastiscus marmoratus or similar 
species ). 


Rhinopias aphanes Eschmeyer, new species. 

(Figure 8.) 

Rhinopias frondosa (not of Giinther), WuitLry, 1964, p. 9, pl. II (3-sentence account re- 
porting a specimen from New Caledonia [this specimen now holotype of R. aphanes]). 
Hototyre. AMS IB7079 (178 mm. S.L., 235 mm. T.L.), New Caledonia, 

outside barrier reef facing Nouméa, at a depth of 30 meters, collected by Yves 

Merlet and Madame R. Catala-Stucki [transferred alive to the Nouméa Aquar- 

ium where it lived for less than a week]. 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 301 


Ficure 8. Rhinopias aphanes, holotype, AMS no. IB7079, 178 mm. S.L., New Caledonia. 


Description. (Based on the holotype and only known specimen.) A large- 
headed, strongly compressed scorpionfish. Dorsal fin with 12 spines and 9%2 
soft rays; no dorsal spine notably longer than the others, third and fourth spines 
the longest, eleventh dorsal spine about % the length of the twelfth spine. Anal 
fin with 3 spines and 5’ soft rays; third spine slightly longer than second, third 
extends past second when fin is depressed. Pectoral rays 16, rays 1 or 2 through 
6 branched. Gill rakers, including rudiments, total 20, 6 on upper arch, and 14 
below, including one at angle; all rakers as short spiny knobs. Scales on body 
small and cycloid; about 70 vertical scale rows (counting a few scale rows above 
lateral line from above first lateral line scale to end of hypural plate). Head 
without scales. 

Spination similar to that in other species of Rhinopias; see account under 
the genus. Preorbital bone with two slight lumps over maxillary, obscured by 
tentacles. Suborbital ridge with 4 spines, first as tiny lump on lateral face of 
preorbital bone, followed by one below anterior part of orbit and two posterior 
ones (poorly defined) just before preopercle bone. Nasal spines small. Pre- 
ocular spine well defined; supraocular spine obscured by tentacle; postocular 
spine very large and broad. Sphenotic spine as a lump. Supplemental pre- 
opercular spine small, obscured by tentacle. First and second preopercular 
spines longest; third and fourth smaller, fifth almost imperceptible. 

Measurements for the holotype in table 1. 

Tentacles and skin appendages numerous; most slender; black or striped 
with black; most branched. 

Preserved coloration as in figure 8. Transparent ovoid and round areas 


302 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc, 4TH SER. 


present between the pectoral rays, most prominent as a row near mid-height of 
pectoral fin. A slide and color photographs taken by Madame Catala-Stucki 
when the specimen was alive show that the holotype was a beautiful yellow and 
black. The pallid areas in figure 8 were lemon yellow, with a few traces of 
white (particularly in one patch on the suborbital stay), and the dark areas 
in figure 8 were black to dark brown. The skin flaps and tentacles were black 
bordered by yellow. The transparent areas of the pectoral fin were apparent. 

COMPARISONS AND REMARKS. Although this specimen was originally identi- 
fied as R. frondosa (Whitley, 1964; Smith, 1966), its color pattern seems dis- 
tinctive and it is thought to represent a separate species. All of the reported 
specimens of R. frondosa seem to have a fairly consistent color pattern as shown 
in our figures 5—7, and the figures reported in the synonymy. The holotype of 
R. aphanes is a little larger in size than the holotype and largest known specimen 
of R. frondosa, but it seems unlikely that the color pattern would change this 
much with growth; there is no indication that the roundish pale areas of R. 
frondosa would become elongate as in R. aphanes (see especially the head). The 
differences in coloration are apparent by comparing figures 5—7 with figure 8. 
Other differences between R. frondosa and R. aphanes are as follows: Rhinopias 
aphanes appears to have a smaller orbit, longer snout, a longer jaw, a longer 
predorsal-fin length, a shorter caudal fin, and some shorter fin spines (table 1) ; 
some of these differences may not remain when additional material is found. 

Rhinopias aphanes is easily separated from R. xenops and R. argoliba on 
the basis of pectoral rays (16 instead of 18) and coloration. 

DISTRIBUTION. This species is known only from the holotype collected near 
Nouméa, New Caledonia. 

NamME. The species name is from the Greek word aphanes (aph’-a-nés), a 
noun, meaning that which is unapparent or inconspicuous, alluding to the cam- 
ouflage provided by its remarkable coloration and skin flaps. 

The common name ‘Merlet’s scorpionfish’ is suggested. Doctor Yves Merlet, 
an avid diver and underwater naturalist, captured the holotype. Over a 12- 
year period he made available numerous valuable specimens for display in the 
Nouméa Aquarium and for study by systematists. He died in a diving accident 
in 1969. 


RELATED GENERA AND SPECIES 


Other genera and species which appear to be related to, or members of, 
Rhino pias are discussed below. The subfamily name Pteroidichthyinae Fowler 
is available. Fowler (1938, p. 51, in key) provided the following meager de- 
scription for the subfamily: ‘Pterodichthyinae, new subfamily. Dorsal spines 
Mie ranaleSpInes: Zecca. Pteropelor.” The subfamily name is based on the genus 
Pteroidichthys Bleeker. Fowler’s incorrect spelling of the subfamily (no i before 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 303 


the d) was emended by Whitley (1954). In the subfamily description in the 
key Fowler listed the dorsal spines as 11 and anal spines as 2, but in his de- 
scription of Pteropelor, the only genus he specifically included in the subfamily, 
he listed dorsal spines as 12 and anal spines as 3. Problems surrounding the 
dorsal and anal spine counts are discussed below. Whitley (1954, p. 60) is 
evidently the only subsequent worker to use the subfamily name, and Whitley 
recognized Pteropelor as a synonym of Rhinopias and referred Rhinopias to the 
subfamily Pteroidichthyinae. It seems likely that the nominal genera Rhino pias, 
Pteropelor, and Pteroidichthys, as well as the genera Pogonoscorpius Regan and 
Hipposcorpaena Fowler, are closely related. They appear to be derivatives of 
the subfamily Scorpaeninae, differing mainly in having a more compressed body; 
but whether they should be retained as a separate subfamily must await a more 
detailed study. 

The monotypic genus Pogonoscorpius Regan is here referred to the subfamily 
Pteroidichthyinae; in fact it may be a synonym of the genus Rhinopias. The 
monotypic genus Hipposcorpaena Fowler, based on a juvenile, also seems closely 
related to Rhinopias. The nominal genera Pteroidichthys and Pteropelor are 
each known from a single species based on 1 or 2 specimens. Rhinopias godfreyi 
Whitley, also known from a single specimen, seems referable to Pteroidichthys. 
The status of each of these nominal genera and species is discussed below, and 
some corrections for information given in the original descriptions are made based 
on examination of the type specimens by the first author. 


1. Pogonoscorpius. 

Pogonoscorpius REGAN, 1908, p. 236 (type-species Pogonoscorpius sechellensis by original 
designation; monotypic). 

Pogonoscorpius sechellensis REGAN, 1908, p. 236, fig. 3 on pl. 28 (original description; type 
locality Seychelles; holotype BMNH 1908.3.23.172). 

Pogonoscorpius seychellensis, SMITH, 1957, pp. 51 and 59, fig. D on pl. 4 (compiled; figure 
from Regan, 1908; misspelled species). 

The genus Pogonoscorpius and the species P. sechellensis are known only 
from the holotype of the species. It is clear that Regan intended the species 
name to be spelled sechellensis rather than seychellensis, since the same spelling 
was used both for the description and figure, and Regan also used this same 
spelling for Champson sechellensis, Synchiropus sechellensis, and Scaeops sechel- 
lensis, three other new species described by him in the same work. Smith’s spell- 
ing (seychellensis) is an unjustified emendation. 

The holotype agrees with species of the genus Rhinopias in meristic features, 
dentition, spination, and body shape. It differs from them in coloration, dis- 
tribution of skin flaps (particularly the presence of a median chin barbel), and 
a less elevated orbit. The drawing accompanying the original description (Regan, 
1908, fig. 3 on pl. 28) is poor. We have reproduced a photograph of the holotype 


304 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRoc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 9. Pogonoscorpius sechellensis, holotype, BMNH no. 1908.3.23.172, 51.4 mm. 
S.L., Seychelles. 


(fig. 9) which better illustrates the body shape. Additional study when speci- 
mens become available may show that this species is best placed in the genus 
Rhino pias. 

The following counts for the holotype were recorded: dorsal rays XII + 9%; 
anal rays III + 5%; pectoral rays 18+18, all rays appear to be unbranched; 
vertical scale rows estimated at about 60 as given by Regan, many missing; gill 
rakers difficult to count, 7 on upper arch, 9 (including one at angle) plus addi- 
tional rudiments on the lower arch. Spination about as in species of the genus 
Rhinopias; supplemental preopercular spine present only on left side, most 
spines small or low. Some measurements (in mm., percent standard length in 
parentheses) were recorded as follows: standard length 51.4; total length about 
66; head length 23.7 (46); body depth 19.8 (38); orbit diameter 4.5 (09); 
snout length 10.1 (20); interorbital width 2.2 (04); jaw length 12.1 (24); pre- 
dorsal-fin length 20.3 (40) ; caudal fin length 14.4 (28); pectoral fin length 15.9 
(31); pelvic fin length 12.3 (24). 

Coloration as given by Regan, “yellowish; fins tinged with reddish.” 

This species appears to be a valid one and is known only from the holotype 
collected in the Seychelles in 37 fathoms. 


2. Hipposcorpaena. 


Hipposcorpaena Fow er, 1938, pp. 71-72 (type-species Hipposcorpaena filamentosa, by 
original designation; monotypic). 

Hipposcorpaena filamentosa Fow ier, 1938, pp. 72-73, fig. 31 (original description; type 
locality Philippine Islands, Gulf of Davao, 7°04’48”N., 125°39'38”E., in 28 fathoms, 
Albatross station D.5253, 18 May 1908; holotype USNM 98819). 


The genus Hipposcorpaena was based on a single specimen of about 29 mm 
S.L., USNM 98819. One additional Philippine specimen is available (USNM 
168183, Albatross station 5174) and is of about the same size as the holotype. 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 305 


The holotype is now in poor condition. Fowler (1938, p. 73) gives a dorsal fin 
count of XI + 10, but this should have been XII + 9%; he lists anal rays as 9, 
but they total 8’ and seem to be III + 5%. Pectoral rays appear to number 
14 as given by Fowler. The rays near the lower end of the pectoral fin are the 
longest, and the fifth from the bottom extends past the posterior base of the 
anal fin (not as in Fowler’s figure 31); the lower principal caudal rays are also 
the longest. The vertical scale rows were given by Fowler as 30; although many 
scales are missing, the scale rows probably number about 35—40. Hipposcorpaena 
filamentosa appears to be a valid species known only from the Philippines. 


3. Pteroidichthys. 

Pteroidichthys BLEEKER, 1856, pp. 33-34 (type-species Pteroidichthys amboinensis Bleeker 
by original designation; monotypic ) ; 1876, p. 5 (generic diagnosis). 

Pteroidichthys amboinensis BLEEKER, 1856, pp. 34-35 (original description; type locality 
Amboina and Manado, Celebes; two syntypes, RMNH 5873); GUNTHER, 1860, p. 127 


(compiled) ; BLEEKER, 1876, pp. 5, 9-10, 12-13, 57-58, fig. 5 on pl. 1 (description com- 
piled from Bleeker, 1856; figure good); 1879, fig. 1 on pl. 414 (figure from Bleeker, 
i876) ; Herre, 1952, p. 436 (compiled from Bleeker) ; pe BrAurort im Weber and de 


Beaufort, 1962, p. 54 (re-examined types; figure redrawn from Bleeker, 1876). 


The two syntypes, RMNH 5873, were briefly examined. They are in fairly 
poor condition and now measure about 67 and 80 mm. in total length and 51 and 
57 mm. in standard length. The counts as given by Bleeker and by de Beaufort 
are dorsal rays XI + 11 and anal rays II + 7. The twelfth element in the dorsal 
fin does not appear to be segmented, although this is difficult to determine and 
the ray is long and flexible; counting by the methods used in this paper the dorsal 
rays number XII + 912, with the twelfth element very long and at the leading 
edge of the soft dorsal fin; anal rays I] + 6%. For further information see 
‘Remarks’ below. 


4. Pteropelor. 

Pteropelor FOWLER, 1938, p. 77 (type-species Pteropelor noronhai Fowler by original des- 
ignation; monotypic). 

Pteropelor noronhai Fow er, 1938, pp. 78-79, fig. 34 (original description; type locality 
vicinity of Hong Kong, China Sea, 21°33’N., 116°13’E., in 100 fathoms, Albatross 
station D.5310, 4 November 1908; holotype USNM 98892, paratype USNM 99009). 
The genus and species were based on two juvenile specimens of 32.7 (USNM 

98892) and 35.5 (USNM 99009) mm. in standard length. Fowler (1938, in 

key, p. 51) states that the dorsal spines number 11 and the anal spines 2, but 

in the description (pp. 78-79) he reports 12 dorsal spines and 3 anal spines. As 
with Pteroidichthys amboinensis and Rhinopias godfreyi, there is difficulty in 
determining if the twelfth dorsal fin element and the third anal fin element are 
spines or segmented rays. In Pteropelor noronhai these fin rays appear to be 
unsegmented. The dorsal spine count would be XII + 9%. The paratype has 


306 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRroc. 4TH SER. 


a total of 8% anal rays (? III + 5%) and the holotype a total of 9% (? III+ 
6’2). Fowler states that there are only 5 or 6 lateral line scales anteriorly, but 
examination of the types shows that the lateral line is probably complete, but 
many scales have been rubbed off; at least nine tubed scales are present in one 
specimen. Fowler gives the vertical scale rows as 25 + 2; we estimate that they 
number considerably more than this, but most scales have been rubbed off. 
Further information is provided in the ‘Remarks’ below. 


5. Rhinopias godfreyi. 


Rhinopias godfreyi WHITLEY, 1954, pp. 60-61, pl. 3, fig. 2 (original description; type locality 

Exmouth Gulf, northwestern Australia; holotype AMS IB2977). 

This species is known only from the holotype, a specimen 46.1 mm. in stan- 
dard length. The counts for the specimen are pectoral rays 15, anal rays II + 
6%, and the dorsal count is either XI + 10’ or XII + 9%; the twelfth dorsal fin 
element appears to be unsegmented; the third anal fin element is segmented 
distally. The vertical scale rows number about 40; the lateral line seems to 
have been complete, although some scales are rubbed off. (Whitley incorrectly 
lists the pectoral rays as 14 and anal rays as III + 6; he gave the dorsal ray 
count as XI + 10.) 


Remarks. Pogonoscorpius and Hipposcorpaena are retained for now as 
separate monotypic genera which appear to be closely related to the genus 
Rhino pias. On the other hand, Pteroidichthys amboinensis, Pteropelor noronhai, 
and Rhinopias godfreyi are very closely related species, and Pteropelor is con- 
sidered a synonym of Péeroidichthys. (Whitley (1954) went even further and 
considered Pteroidichthys a synonym of Rhinopias.) It is possible that more 
thorough study of the available specimens and additional specimens as they 
are captured will show that Pteroidichthys amboinensis Bleeker 1856, Pteropelor 
noronhai Fowler 1938, and Rhinopias godfreyi Whitley 1954 are all based on 
different sized specimens of the same species, or at least that some of them are 
synonyms of one another. These specimens are characterized by having dorsal 
fin rays XII + 9'2 (the twelfth element which is at the leading edge of the 
soft dorsal fin may be segmented in large specimens), anal rays normally II + 
6% (possibly with the third element unsegmented in small specimens); and 
pectoral rays 14 or 15, rays unbranched (?). They are further characterized 
by having a very compressed body, very long fins (particularly the anal fin), 
and long supraocular tentacles which are branched in large specimens. They 
differ from species of the genera Rhinopias, Pogonoscorpius, and Hipposcorpaena 
most notably in the condition of the third anal fin element (two rather than three 
anal spines) and also in such features as a less deep body, shorter head, and 
lower pectoral ray count. If these three nominal species are all the same species 
then the localities from which it has been collected are Hong Kong, Celebes, 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEVER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 307 


Ficure 10. Pteroidichthys amboinensis, ZMC uncat., 36.4 mm. S.L., Vietnam. 


Amboina, and northwestern Australia. It is an offshore species, probably living 
in coral in depths from perhaps 30 to 100 fathoms. 

One additional specimen (fig. 10) was found which is referable to this com- 
plex. The specimen measures 36.4 mm. in standard length and is from the col- 
lection of the Zoological Museum of Copenhagen with the following data: col- 
lected at Nhatrang Bay, Vietnam, 16 November 1959, by J. Knudsen. This 
specimen has counts of dorsal rays XII + 9%, anal rays II + 6%, and pectoral 
rays 16+ 15 (all simple). In coloration it is most like the type of Pteropelor 
noronhai. 


SHEDDING OF ‘SKIN’ 


Sloughing of ‘skin’ in the scorpaenid Taenianotus triacanthus has been dis- 
cussed recently by Wickler and Nowak (1969), although they missed an earlier 
account of shedding in Taenianotus by Faulkner (1961). The first mention of 
shedding was by Gilchrist (1920) for Agriopus (subfamily Congiopodinae). 
Hirosaki (1957) discussed shedding in scorpaenids, including the genera Pterois, 
Parapterois, and Erosa, and other fishes, and (1971a—c) in Rhinopias argoliba. 
Faulkner (1961) also reported sloughing of skin in Pterois sphex. From museum 
specimens we can report that this shedding also occurs in stonefishes (Synanceia, 
subfamily Synanceiinae), the genus /nimicus, and evidently all species of Pterois 
(subfamily Pteroinae). The holotype of Rhinopias aphanes also has pieces of 
‘skin’ hanging from it as do some specimens of R. xenops and R. frondosa. 

Previous authors who have commented on the shed layer have described it 
as skin, and have correctly pointed out that it is not mucous. Samples have been 
analysed for us by Richard Krejsa, and he informs us that the shed layer is 
best termed a cuticle, an epidermal product; some cells are lost with the shed 
layer but the basic matrix is cuticular. Further histological studies are being 
made by Dr. Krejsa. 

Hirosaki (1971a—c) found that in R. argoliba shedding occurred in the 
Enoshima Aquarium 9 times in 114 days at regular intervals (January 30, Feb- 


308 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRroc. 4TH SER. 


ruary 13 and 28, March 12 and 30, April 11 and 24, May 8 and 18). The cuticle 
from the entire body was shed each time. It appears that shedding was a natural 
event not caused by any sort of shock. The function of the shedding probably 
involves the removal of algae, external parasites, and other objects which might 
accumulate on the skin of these basically sedentary fishes. 

The genera /nimicus, Minous, and Choridactylus are peculiar scorpaenids 
which have one to three lower pectoral rays thickened and free. Each free ray 
is tipped with a ‘friction pad’ or ‘cap.’ The caps are easily dislodged in preserved 
specimens. These thickened caps, covering the distal one-fourth to one-tenth 
of each ray, are made of the same cuticular substance, although much thicker, 
as the shed layer of the scorpaenids listed above; almost certainly these caps are 
used as an aid for ‘walking’ on the bottom with the free pectoral rays. (These 
‘caps’ will be discussed more fully in a subsequent paper on the subfamily 
Minoinae. ) 


LITERATURE CITED 


AXELROD, HERBERT R., and WARREN E. BuRGESS 
1972. Pacific marine fishes, Book 1. T. F. H. Publications, Neptune City, New Jersey, 
280 pp., 489 color figs. 
BLEEKER, PIETER 
1856. Beschrijvingen van nieuwe en weinig bekende vischsoorten van Amboina, . . . 
Acta Societatis Scientiarum Indo-Neerlandicae, vol. 1, pp. 1-76. 
1876. Mémoire sur les espéces insulindiennes de la famille des Scorpénoides. Verhande- 
lingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen, vol. 16, pp. 1-100, 
pls. 1-5. 
1879. Atlas ichthyologique des Indes Orientales Néerlandaises. . .Amsterdam, vol. 9, 
pls. 355-360, 363-420. 
DERANTYAGALA, P. E. P. 
1952. A colored atlas of some vertebrates from Ceylon. Vol. 1. Ceylon National Mu- 
seums Publication, 149 pp., 34 pls., 60 text figs. 
ESCHMEYER, WILLIAM N. 
1969. A systematic review of the scorpionfishes of the Atlantic Ocean (Pisces: Scor- 
paenidae). Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, no. 79, 
130 pp., 13 figs. 
FAULKNER, S. DOUGLAS 
1961. Fishes that shed skin, sway like ocean plants. Taenianotus triacanthus. Aquarium 
Journal, April, 1961, pp. 169-170. 
FourMANoIR, P., and P. GUEZE 
1967. Poissons nouveaux ou peu connus provenant de la Réunion et de Madagascar. 
III. Sept espéces intéressantes trouvees récemment dans les eaux Malgaches 
et Réunionnaises. Cahiers ORSTOM, Océanography, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 55-58. 
FourMANoIR, P., and Do-THI NHU-YUNG 
1965. Liste complémentaire des poissons marins de Nha-trang. Cahiers ORSTOM, 
Oceanography, no. spécial, Juillet, 1965, 114 pp. 
FOWLER, HENRY W. 
1928. The fishes of Oceania. Memoirs of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, vol. X, pp. 
1-540, pls. I-XLIX. 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER ET AL.: NEW SCORPIONFISHES 309 


1938. Descriptions of new fishes obtained by the United States Bureau of Fisheries 
Steamer “Albatross”, chiefly in Philippine Seas and adjacent waters. Pro- 
ceedings of the United States National Museum, vol. 85, no. 3032, pp. 31-135, 
text figs. 6-61. 
GILBERT, CHARLES HENRY 
1905. The deep-sea fishes of the Hawaiian Islands. Pp. 577-713, pls. 66-111, figs. 230- 
276, in David Starr Jordan and Barton Warren Evermann, The aquatic re- 
sources of the Hawaiian Islands. Bulletin of the United States Fish Com- 
mission, vol. 23, for 1903, part 2. 
Gitcurist, J. D. F. 
1920. Ecdysis in a teleostean fish, Agriopus. The Quarterly Journal of Micrescopical 
Science, vol. 64, pp. 575-587. 
GILL, THEODORE 
1905. Note on the genera of Synanceine and Pelorine fishes. Proceedings of the United 
States National Museum, vol. 28, no. 1394, pp. 221-225, 1 fig. 
GosLINE, WILLIAM A. 
1965. Vertical zonation of inshore fishes in the upper water layers of the Hawaiian 
Islands. Ecology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 823-831. 
GosLINE, WILLIAM A., and VERNON E. Brock 
1960. Handbook of Hawaiian fishes. University of Hawaii Press, 372 pp., 277 text figs. 
GUNTHER, ALBERT 
1860. Catalogue of the acanthopterygian fishes in the collection of the British Museum, 
vol. 2, xxi-+ 548 pp. 
1891. Description of a remarkable fish from Mauritius, belonging to the genus Scorpaena. 
Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, year 1891, pp. 482-483, pl. 39. 
Herre, ALBERT W. C. T. 
1952. A review of the scorpaenoid fishes of the Philippines and adjacent seas. The 
Philippine Journal of Science, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 381-482. 
Hirosaki, YOSHITSUGU 
1957. Observations on ecdysis in Japanese fishes (Preliminary Report). Journal of 
the Faculty of Science of Hokkaido University, ser. VI, Zoology, vol. 13, nos. 
1-4, pp. 178-179. 
1971a. Uo no dappi (Ecdysis in fishes). Asahi-Lalousse, Shukan Sekaiddbutsu Hyakka, 
no. 4, pp. 4-5. (In Japanese). 
1971b. Dappi o tsuzukeru figawarina kaisuigyo (A strange marine fish which continues 
shedding). Fish Magazine, Tokyo, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 26-27, plus front cover. 
(In Japanese). 
1971c. Kaichiiddbutsu no fushigi (Wonders of marine animals). Jz Sea Fantasy—the 
world under the ocean surface. Tokyo, pp. 153-174. (In Japanese). 
Jorpan, Davin S., and Barton W. EVERMANN 
1926. A check list of the fishes of Hawaii. Journal of the Pan-Pacific Research Insti- 
tution, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3-15. 
Jorpan, Davi S., and ALVIN SEALE 
1906. The fishes of Samoa. . . Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries, vol. 25 (for 1905), 
pp. 173-455, 111 text figs., pls. 38-53. 
KAmoHarA, TOSHIJI 
1942. Rare fishes of the Provinces of Kishu and Tosa [= Wakayama and Kochi 
Prefectures]. Dobutsugaku Zassi [Zoological Magazine], Tokyo, vol. 54, no. 
1, pp. 25-28. (In Japanese). 


310 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


1950. Description of the fishes from the Provinces of Tosa and Kishi, Japan. Kochi, 
368 pp., 220 text figs. (In Japanese, with English title). 
1959. New records of fishes from Kochi Prefecture, Japan. Reports of the USA 
Marine Biological Station, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-8, 3 text figs. 
1964. Revised catalogue of fishes of Kochi Prefecture, Japan. Reports of the USA 
Marine Biological Station, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-99, 63 text figs. 
KotrrHaus, ADOLF 
1966. Fischforschung im Indischen Ozean ‘“Meteor’-Expedition 1964/65. Umschau in 
Wissenschaft und Technik, jarhgang heft 1966, pp. 118-123, 8 figs. 
MAstuBarA, KtyoMatTsu 
1943. Studies on the scorpaenoid fishes of Japan. The Transactions of the Sigenkagaku 
Kenkyusyo, no. 1, 486 pp., 4 pls. 
Munro, IAn F. R. 
1955. The fishes of New Guinea. Department of Agriculture, Stock and Fisheries, 
Port Morsby, XX XVII -+ 651 pp., 6 color pls., 78 pls., 23 text figs. 
PALMER, G. 
1963. The scorpaenid fishes of the genera Rhinopias Gill and Peloropsis Gilbert. Annals 
and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 13, vol. 6, pp. 701-704, pl. 20 
REGAN, C. TATE 
1908. Report on the marine fishes collected by Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner in the Indian 
Ocean. The transactions of the Linnean Society of London, vol. 12, part 3, no. 
14, pp. 217-255, pls. 23-32. 
SmirTH, J. L. B. 
1957. The fishes of the family Scorpaenidae in the western Indian Ocean, part 1. The 
subfamily Scorpaeninae. Ichthyological Bulletin, Rhodes University, Grahams- 
town, no. 4, pp. 49-72, pls. 1-4. 
1966. Certain rare fishes from South Africa with other notes. Occasional Papers, 
Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, no. 7, pp. 65— 
80, pls. 13-14. 
TINKER, SPENCER W. 
1944. Hawaiian fishes. Tongg publishing Co., Honolulu, 404 pp., text figs. 8 pls. 
Weser, Max, and L. F. DE BEAUFORT 
1962. The fishes of the Indo-Australian Archipelago, XI. Scleroparei, Hyostomides. . . 
Xenopterygii. E. J. Brill, Leiden, 481 pp., 100 text figs. 
WHITLEY, GIvBeErT P. 
1954. More new fish names and records. The Australian Zoologist, vol. 12, part 1, 
pp. 57-62, pl. 3. 
1964. Camouflaged fish from New Caledonia. The Australian Naturalist, vol. 12, part 4, 
p. 9, pl. II. 
WICKLER, WOLFGANG, and CHRISTEL NOWAK 
1969. Hautung und andere Verhaltensweisen von Taentanotus triacanthus, einem 
verwandten der Skorpionfische. Natur und Museum, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 441— 
456, 9 figs. 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 17, pp. 311-336; 6 figs. August 9, 1973 


THE BRACHYURAN CRABS OF EASTER ISLAND' 


By 


John S. Garth 


Allan Hancock Foundation 
University of Southern California 


INTRODUCTION 


Easter Island or Rapa Nui is a volcanic island lying in the eastern South 
Pacific at Latitude 27° 10’ S. and Longitude 109° 26’ W. (Cook Bay or Hanga- 
Roa). Roughly triangular in shape, it measures approximately 11 miles along 
its major dimension, from southwest to east, and approximately 8 miles along 
each of its two shorter legs. Each corner is dominated by a volcanic crater or 
shield, of which La Pérouse Mountain (Rana Hana Kana), near North Cape, 
is highest (1767 feet). The principal anchorages are at Cook Bay (Hanga-Roa) 
on the west side and La Pérouse Bay on the northeast side. Neither of these is 
protected in all weather and a ship must be prepared to up-anchor on an hour’s 
notice, a circumstance that accounts in part for the infrequency with which the 
island has been visited by scientific parties. Of these only one is known to have 
made significant collections of marine animals: the Albatross Eastern Pacific 
Expedition of 1904-1905. According to Alexander Agassiz (1906, p. 56), expe- 
dition leader, “Considerable collecting was done at Easter Island .... We col- 
lected a number of shore fishes, and made a small collection of the littoral fauna. 
The fishes have a decided Pacific look, and the few species of sea urchins . . . 
have a wide distribution in the Pacific.”” The Brachyura of this expedition were 
reported on by Rathbun (1907), who listed the following six species from Easter 
Island: 


1 Allan Hancock Foundation Contribution No. 345. 


311 


312 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


XANTHIDAE: Pseudoliomera remota (Rathbun) 
Trapezia ferruginea Latreille. 

GrapsIpAaE: Leptograpsus variegatus (Fabricius) 
Pachygrapsus transversus (Gibbes) 
Ptychognathus easteranus Rathbun 
Plagusia dentipes (De Haan). 


The Heyerdahl Expedition of 1955-1956 collected a single brachyuran on 
Easter Island. Not hitherto reported, it is included herewith: 


GRAPSIDAE: Geograpsus crinipes (Dana). 


The Medical Expedition to Easter Island (METEI) visited the island in 
1964-1965. Collections of brachyuran crabs were made from late December to 
early February at the following localities: on the north side of the island at 
Anakena Bay; on the west side of the island at Hanga-Roa, Hanga-piko, and 
Mataveri (inland from Hanga-piko); on the south side of the island at Vaihu. 
Most of the collecting was intertidal, but that at Anakena was in water of 20- 
25 foot depth. Specimens were collected by rotenone poisoning at Vaihu, and 
the stomach of a large starfish from an unknown locality yielded crabs of the 
genus Trapezia, usually associated with corals. Except where noted, as in the 
case of children and islanders, who provided native names for crabs, all col- 
lecting was done by Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. 

Fourteen species of brachyuran crabs are included in the METEI collection, 
a number double that obtained by earlier expeditions. Among the 14 are all 
previously collected species except Pseudoliomera remota, obtained by the 
Albatross Expedition, and Geograpsus crinipes, obtained by the Heyerdahl Expe- 
dition. A second specimen of Ptychognathus easteranus of the opposite sex 
from the unique holotype was collected. The number of crab families known 
from Easter Island was increased from two to four with the addition of the 
Dromiidae and Portunidae; the number of genera was increased from seven to 
twelve with the addition of Dromidia, Portunus, Carpilius, Chlorodiella, and 
Cyclograpsus; and among the seven species new to the island is a second species 
of Plagusia new to science. 

The Expedicién Isla de Pascua (EIP) of the Instituto Central de Biologia, 
Universidad de Concepcion, Chile, visited the island in August, 1972. Collec- 
tions of brachyuran crabs were made intertidally at Anakena Bay, Hanga-Roa, 
and Hotu-Iti by H. I. Moyano, at Tahai by T. Cekalovic, and by diving in 8- 
10 meters by V. A. Gallardo. Specimens were sent to the author for identifi- 
cation in November, 1972, by M. A. Retamal, who has kindly permitted in- 
corporation of the new records in the present manuscript. 

Included in the EIP collection are twelve species of brachyuran crabs. Among 
them are five species also collected by the METEI and one species collected 


Vol. XXXIX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 313 


by the Heyerdahl Expedition. The remaining six species include five widely 
ranging Indo-west Pacific species not previously known from Easter Island 
and one that appears to be new to science. The number of genera known from 
Easter Island is increased from twelve to sixteen with the addition of Thalamita, 
Etisus, Liomera (= Carpilodes), and Lophozozymus. Description of the new 
species will appear subsequently in a Chilean journal, at Professor Retamal’s 
request. 

The astute carcinologist will note that two large groups of Brachyura, the 
Oxystomata and the Oxyrhyncha, are lacking from Easter Island collections 
made to date, the list being composed entirely of Dromiacea and Brachyrhyncha. 
It may be confidently predicted that when present terrestrial and intertidal col- 
lecting is extended to include the subtidal, representatives of these groups will 
be added; for while a few oxystomatous and oxyrhynchous crabs occur in 
weeds and among corals in the tropical Pacific, more are to be found by shallow 
dredging. 


HisTor1tcaL NOTE 


Through the research of Dr. L. B. Holthuis of the Royal Netherlands Mu- 
seum of Natural History, Leiden, I am able to mention what is probably the 
oldest observation of crabs on Easter Island. It is found in the account of Don 
Juan Hervé, first pilot or senior navigating officer of the San Lorenzo, one of 
two vessels comprising the expedition to the islands under Don Felipe Gonzalez 
in 1770 (Hervé, 1908, p. 122), as reprinted in the Works of the Hakluyt Society, 
transcribed and edited by B. G. Corney. In the description of the small, rocky 
islets at the southwest tip of the island, now known as Needle Rock or Motu- 
kaokao and Flat Rock or Motu-nui, is the statement: “We passed on to the 
outer one, where we succeeded in landing, and on which we found two large 
masses of seaweed, many black flints, some sea urchins and small crabs, eggs of 
seagulls and their fledglings . . .” It is tempting to speculate, in the light of 
METEI findings, what these small crabs might have been. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


When preparing the account of the brachyuran decapod Crustacea of Chile 
a decade and a half ago (Garth, 1957) it was realized that this work was in- 
complete in that coverage of the Chilean Isla de Pascua, as Easter Island is 
known to the Spanish-speaking world, was lacking. Since no new specimen 
material was then available, as in the case of Juan Fernandez Island, it was 
thought better to await the arrival of fresh collections than to redescribe the 
older ones. Such an opportunity presented itself with the extensive collections 
made by Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias on the Medical Expedition to Easter 


314 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 47TH SER. 


Island, and to them the author is indebted for the privilege of extending his 
knowledge of the Chilean fauna to this island outpost of the Pacific. 

Inclusion in the present report of the single specimen of brachyuran crab col- 
lected at Easter Island by the Heyerdahl Expedition of 1955-1956 was made 
possible through the courtesy of Mr. Nils Knaben of the Oslo Museum, with 
Dr. L. B. Holthuis of the Leiden Museum facilitating arrangements. 

Inclusion in the present report of the Easter Island collections of the Insti- 
tuto Central de Biologia, Universidad de Concepcion, Chile, was made possible 
through the kindness of Prof. M. A. Retamal. 

The writer is indebted to Mme. Daniéle Guinot of the Muséum National 
d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, for identifying the Chlorodiella species from Easter 
Island, and to Dr. T. Sakai of Kamakura, Japan, for confirming the identity 
of Plagusia dentipes from Easter Island with Japanese specimens. He wishes to 
thank Dr. C. B. Goodhart of the Museum of Zoology of Cambridge University, 
Cambridge (see Garth, 1971), for permission to examine specimens of Pseudo- 
liomera remota and P. lata from the Indian Ocean, and Dr. L. B. Holthuis of 
the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, and Mr. J. Forest of the 
Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, for permission to examine the 
type-specimens of Plagusia species at their respective institutions. 

Consultation of type-specimens in European museums was made possible by 
a grant from the National Science Foundation (GB-3849). Illustration of the 
new species of Plagusia was provided by a grant from the Research and Publi- 
cation Fund (National Defense Education Act) of the University of Southern 
California. 

The sponge covering of Dromidia was identified by Dr. Gerald J. Bakus of 
the University of Southern California. The coral hosts of Trapezia species were 
identified by Dr. John W. Wells of Cornell University and the star fish from the 
stomach of which Trapezia species were recovered was identified by Mr. James 
Clark of Harvard University. Dr. F. A. Chace, Jr. of the U. S. National Mu- 
seum reviewed the manuscript and made valuable suggestions. 


ACCOUNT OF SPECIES 


RESTRICTION OF SYNONYMIES. The synonymies that follow are restricted 
to the original description, the first use of the name in its present combination, 
a good illustration if not included in the above two, the first record from Easter 
Island, and, in order to provide documentation for the zoogeographical dis- 
cussion to follow, records from adjacent Pacific islands from which the species 
might have migrated to Easter Island. In cases of involved synonymies, ref- 
erence is made to one of the regional monographs, such as Alcock (1900), Ed- 
mondson (1922, 1954, 1959, 1962), Forest & Guinot (1961), Ihle (1913), 
Rathbun (1906, 1918, 1930), or Sakai (1936, 1939). 


Vol. XXXIX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 315 


LIST OF SPECIES 


Alba-  Heyer- 

tross dahl METEI 

1904— 1955- 1964— EIP 
1905 1956 1965 1972 


DROMIACEA 


DROMIIDAE 
Dromidia unidentata (Ruppell). xX 


BRACHYGNATHA-BRACHYRHYNCHA 


PORTUNIDAE 
Portunus pubescens (Dana) xX 
Thalamita xX 
XANTHIDAE 
Car pilius convexus (¥Forskal) xX 
Liomera rugata (Milne Edwards) x 
Actaea parvula (Krauss) xX 
Pseudoliomera remota (Rathbun) xX 
Lophozozymus dodone (Herbst) x 
Etisus electra (Herbst) xX 
Chlorodiella cytherea (Dana) Xx xX 
Trapezia areolata Dana x xX 
Trapezia cymodoce (Herbst) x xX 
Trapezia danai Ward (= maculata Dana) xX 
Trapezia ferruginea Latreille xX xX 
Species incertae sedis.” x xX 
GRAPSIDAE 
Geograpsus crinipes (Dana) X xX 
Leptograpsus variegatus (Fabricius) xX xX x 
Pachygrapsus transversus (Gibbes) xX xX 
Ptychognathus easteranus Rathbun xX xX 
Cyclograpsus longipes Stimpson x 
Plagusia dentipes De Haan x X 
Plagusia integripes Garth, new species xX 
6 1 14 i? 


2 One small xanthid obtained by the METEI is unreported pending further study. 


316 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Section BRACHYURA 
Subsection DROMIACEA 
Superfamily DRomiIDEA 
Family DRroMrIDAE 
Dromidia unidentata unidentata (Rippell). 


Dromia unidentata RUPPELL, 1830, p. 16, pl. 4, fig. 2; pl. 6, fig. 9 (Red Sea) ; AtcocK, 1900, 

p. 139, literature; Cuiiton, 1911, p. 554 (Kermadec Islands). 

Dromidia unidentata, KOSSMANN, 1880, p. 67; ILE, 1913, p. 31 (New Guinea), synonymy; 

SAKAI, 1936, p. 13, pl. 6, fig. 2; text-figs. 2a, b (Japan). 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Anakena, Easter Island, METEI Station F 85, 20- 
25 feet, 15 January 1965, 1 male, Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. The 
crab was covered by a sponge identified as Hymeniacidon species by Dr. Gerald 
J. Bakus. 

MEASUREMENTS. Male specimen: length of carapace 13.4 mm., width 
11.3 mm. 

DISTRIBUTION. From Red Sea and East Africa to New Guinea and Japan; 
Kermadec Islands and, as subspecies D. u. Aawaiiensis Edmondson (1922, p. 
34), Hawaii. 

Remarks. The Easter Island specimen allies itself with the widely distrib- 
uted Indo-west Pacific subspecies, rather than with the Hawaiian subspecies 
described by Edmondson (1922, p. 34). The only other South Pacific record 
is from Meyer Island in the Kermadec Islands (Chilton, 1911), which lie north- 
east of New Zealand in Latitude 30° S., a few degrees more southerly than 
Easter Island. Other islands lying south of the Tropic of Capricorn and, to- 
gether with Rapa Nui (Easter) and Sala y Gomez, completing an arc to San 
Felix and San Ambrosio off the coast of Chile are Rapa, Morotiri (Bass), Pit- 
cairn, Henderson, and Ducie. 


Subsection BRACHYGNATHA 
Superfamily BRACHYRHYNCHA 
Family PoRTUNIDAE 


Portunus pubescens (Dana). 


Lupa pubescens DANA, 1852b, p. 274; 1855, pl. 16, fig. 9 (Sandwich Islands). 

Portunus pubescens, RATHBUN, 1906, p. 870, pl. 14, fig. 1; Epamonpson, 1923, p. 22 (Palmyra) ; 
STEPHENSON and CAMPBELL, 1959, p. 99, figs. 2C, 3C, pl. 1, fig. 3; pls. 4C, 5C, synonymy. 

Neptunus pubescens, SAKAI, 1934, p. 303 (Japan). 

Neptunus tomentosus HASWELL, 1882, p. 547 (Australia). 


MATERIAL EXAMINED. Hanga-Roa, near camp, January 1965, 1 female, Ian 
E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. 


Vol. XXXIX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 317 


MEASUREMENTS. Female specimen: length of carapace 28.0 mm., width 
including lateral spines 44.6 mm., without spines 39.0 mm. 

DisTRIBUTION. Australia, Japan, Hawaii, and Line Islands (Palmyra). 
The early record from Port Jackson, New South Wales, is based on Stephenson 
and Campbell’s synonymy of Neptunus tomentosus. 

Remarks. The occurrence at Easter Island of Portunus pubescens, until 
recently known only from the north Central Pacific and Japan, becomes more 
plausible with the establishment of its identity with the Australian P. tomentosus 
and its recognition as a southern hemisphere species, Easter Island being in the 
Latitude of Brisbane. It is probable that P. pubescens occurs widely through- 
out the South Pacific but has not been reported because of insufficient collecting. 
Traces of reddish brown color remain on the metagastric and epibranchial regions 
after three and a half years in alcohol. 


Family XANTHIDAE 


Carpilius convexus (Forskal). 


Cancer convexus ForSKAL, 1775, p. 88 (Red Sea). 

Carpilius convexus RUPPELL, 1830, p. 13, pl. 3, fig. 2; pl. 6, fig. 6 (Tahiti); Dana, 1852b, 
p. 159; 1855, pl. 7, fig. 5 (Sandwich Islands); RAtusBun, 1907, p. 37 (Tuamotu) ; 
Boone, 1934, p. 89, pls. 43-45, synonymy; BARNARD, 1950, p. 205 (Durban) ; EpmMonpson, 
1962, p. 223, fig. lb; GarTH, 1965, p. 16, figs. 8 (male pleopods), 13 (Clipperton Island). 
MATERIAL EXAMINED. Anakena, Station M 5, 1 meter, 23 December 1964, 

2 females, collected by islanders. Mataveri, Station M 41, 21 January 1965, 

1 female, Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. 

MESUREMENTS. Specimens, all females, measured 62.8 X 85.4, 70.7 X 95.1, 
and 73 X 96 mm. in length and width of carapace, respectively. 

DisTRIBUTION. From the Red Sea and South Africa to Hawaii, Tahiti, and 
Tuamotu. Clipperton Island. 

Remarks. The color of the Easter Island specimens resembled nothing that 
this writer has encountered previously with this or any other brachyuran spe- 
cies. It was as if each specimen had been dipped, like an Easter egg, in a series 
of dyes: orange, pink, and blue, while being held each time by a different ap- 
pendage. The result was a piebald appearance of utmost irregularity that could 
not be called a pattern. Suspecting some artifact in the preserving process, the 
writer queried Tan E. Efford, but was assured that this was their natural color- 
ing before preservation. The native name for this spectacular crab is Pikea 
Tutuau. 

Widely distributed throughout the Indo-west Pacific, Carpilius convexus 
has now been reported twice from the eastern Pacific, once at Clipperton Island 
and now at Easter Island, in the same Longitude, 109° W. Some 37° of Lat- 


318 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


itude, or 2,200 nautical miles, separate the two localities. The genus occurs also 
in the western Atlantic, but is absent from the American west coast. 


Liomera rugata (Milne Edwards). 


Carpilodes rugatus, A. Mi1nr Epwarps, 1865, p. 230, pl. 12, figs. 3, 3a, 3b; ORTMANN, 1893, 

p. 468 (Tahiti) ; ODHNER, 1925, p. 20, pl. 1, fig. 16 (Gilbert Islands) ; EpDMonpson, 1962, 

p. 249, fig. 9a, synonymy. 

Carpilodes monticulosus, RATHBUN, 1906, p. 884 (Hawaii); 1907, p. 37 (Tuamotu). [Not 

C. monticulosus A. Milne Edwards. | 
Liomera rugatus, BARNARD, 1950, p. 237. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Hotu-iti, 8 August 1972, one female, H. I. Moyano, 
1 ie 

MEASUREMENTS. Female specimen, length of carapace 12.2 mm., width 
21.4 mm. 

DISTRIBUTION. From Red Sea and Mauritius to Tahiti, Tuamotu, and 
Hawaii. 

Remarks. This common Indo-west Pacific species has been confused with 
Liomera monticulosa (A. Milne Edwards) by such authorities as Borradaile 
(1902) and Rathbun (1907), according to Odhner (1925), whose figure is the 
basis for our identification. 


Actaea parvula (Krauss). 


Menippe parvulus Krauss, 1843, p. 34, pl. 2, figs. 2, a-c (Natal). 

Actaea parvula, LENz, 1910, p. 549 (Madagascar) ; ODHNER, 1925, p. 51, pl. 3, fig. 13 (Galle, 
Ceylon; Fiji; Marquesas); BarNnarp, 1950, p. 234, text-fig. 43, g, h (Delgoa Bay), 
synonymy. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Anakena Bay, 9 August 1972, 2 males, one ovigerous 
female, H. I. Moyano, University of Concepcion, Chile. 

MEASUREMENTS. Male specimens, 8.9 X 11.7 and 10.5 X 14.1 mm.; ovigerous 
female specimen 11.5 X 15.5 mm. in length and breadth of carapace, respectively. 

CoLoR IN ALCOHOL. Carapace yellow, with red-orange blotches on gastric and 
hepatic regions (three blotches in all). Chelipeds and legs yellow, fingers white 
with brown pigment visible beneath the surface. Hairs golden. 

Remarks. Easter Island specimens were compared with a 9.3 X 12.5 mm. 
female collected by the writer at Galle, Ceylon, in 1964, which had in turn been 
compared with specimens in the British Museum (Natural History), also from 
Galle, Ceylon, identified by T. Odhner. The salient, tridentate tooth on the 
immovable finger of the chela is characteristic of the species. 


Pseudoliomera remota (Rathbun). 


Actaea remota RatHBUN, 1907, p. 43, pl. 1, fig. 9; pl. 7, fig. 1 (Easter Island); 1911, p. 217 
(Salomon, Coetivy) ; ODHNER, 1925, p. 63 (Hilo, Hawaii) ; SaKat, 1939, p. 490, pl. 93, 
fig. 4 (Tosa Bay) ; Gutnot, 1962, p. 237, figs. 8, 9 (Maldive Islands). 


Vol. XXXIX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 319 


Actaea nana KLUNZINGER, 1913, p. 86 (Koseir, Red Sea). 
Pseudoliomera remota, GUINOT, 1967, p. 561; 1969, p. 228. 


PREVIOUS COLLECTION. Easter Island, shore, 20 December 1904, 1 male, 
Albatross (Rathbun, 1907). 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. None from among METEI collections. Through 
the kindness of Dr. C. B. Goodhart of the University Museum of Zoology, 
Cambridge, it was possible to examine the young female from Salomon collected 
by the Sealark. 

MEASUREMENTS. Young female: length of carapace 4.0 mm., width 4.6 mm. 
The holotype male (USNM no. 32849) measures 6.0 mm. in length and 8.7 mm. 
in width of carapace (Rathbun, 1907). 

DISTRIBUTION. Red Sea and western Indian Ocean to Japan, Hawaii, and 
Easter Island. The west Australian record (Guinot, 1962, fig. 9) is an error of 
provenience resulting from a confusion of names between the Eastern Islands 
of the Houtman Abrolhos group in the eastern Indian Ocean and Easter Island 
(ile de Paques) in the eastern South Pacific. A Christmas Island also exists 
in both eastern Indian and central Pacific oceans further to confound the 
zoogeographer. 

Remarks. As noted from the Indian Ocean specimen examined, Pseudo- 
liomera remota is a patterned species with the inner protogastric areoles broadly 
continuous with the front and the outer protogastric areoles discontinuous with 
the inner orbital areoles. The fingers resemble those of Pseudoliomera lata 
(Borradaile) from the Maldive Islands (see Garth, 1971), also seen at Cam- 
bridge University (cf. Guinot, 1962, figs. 6 and 8). The synonymy of Actaea 
nana Klunzinger (cf. Odhner, 1925) permits the inclusion of the Red Sea in 
the already extended longitudinal range of the species. 


Lophozozymus dodone (Herbst). 


Cancer dodone Hersst, 1801, p. 37, pl. 52, fig. 5 (East Indies). 
Atergatis elegans HELLER, 1862, p. 519; 1865, p. 7, pl. 1, fig. 3 (Tahiti). 
Lophozozymus dodone, ALcock, 1898, p. 108 (Andaman); Batss, 1938, p. 39 (Fiji, Tahiti). 

Forest and Guinot, 1961, p. 54, text-figs. 39a, b (Tahiti), synonymy. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Anakena Bay, shore, 9 August 1972, 1 male, H. I. 
Moyano, University of Concepcién Expedition. 

MEASUREMENTS. Male specimen: length of carapace 6.1 mm., width 9.2 mm. 

DISTRIBUTION. From South Africa to Hawaii and Tahiti. 

Remarks. The Easter Island specimen was compared with a specimen from 
Hawaii of like size and sex. The slight discrepancies noted are believed to lie 
within the normal range of variation for this widely ranging Indo-west Pacific 
species. 


320 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Etisus electra (Herbst). 


Cancer electra HErsst, 1801, p. 34, pl. 51, fig. 6 (East Indies). 

Etisus rugosus JACQUINOT, 1852, pl. 4, fig. 2; 1853, p. 33 (Tuamotu). 

Etisodes sculptilis A. MILNE Epwarps, 1873, p. 236, pl. 9, fig. 2 (New Caledonia). 
Etisodes electra, Nos, 1907, p. 390 (Tuamotu) ; RATHBUN, 1907, p. 42 (Tuamotu, Gilbert 

Islands) ; Forest and Gurnot, 1961, p. 89, figs. 82a, b (Tahiti), synonymy. 

Etisus electra, BARNARD, 1950, p. 245, figs. 45a, b (South Africa); Gurnot, 1964, p. 59. 
Etisus (Etisodes) electra, HoLTHUutIs, 1953, p. 21 (Marianas, Gilbert Islands). 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Anakena Bay, sand, 9 August 1972, 1 male, 1 young, 
H. I. Moyano, University of Concepcion, Chile. 

MEASUREMENTS. Male specimen, length of carapace 5.4 mm., width 6.8 mm. 

DISTRIBUTION. From the Red Sea and Mozambique (Delgoa Bay) to Tahiti 
and Tuamotu (Manga Reva). 

Remarks. The Easter Island specimens compare with the figure of Etisodes 
sculptilis A. Milne Edwards, a synonym of Etisus electra (Herbst), according 
to Guinot (1964). The far-flung distribution of this small xanthid makes it 
a likely colonizer of island outposts like Easter. 


Chlorodiella cytherea (Dana). 
Chlorodius cytherea DANA, 1852a, p. 79; 1852b, p. 213; 1855, pl. 12, figs. 2a-c (Tuamotu and 

Hawaii). 

Chlorodiella cytherea, HottHuts, 1953, p. 14 (Marianas and Gilbert islands); Forest and 

Gu1not, 1961, p. 95, figs. 90-92, 98a, b (Tahiti), synonymy. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Hanga-piko, tide pool, Station M 10, 31 December 
1964, 1 ovigerous female, Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. Anakena Bay, 
on the beach, 9 August 1972, 1 young male, H. I. Moyano, EIP. 

MEASUREMENTS. Female specimen: length of carapace 6.1 mm., width 9.6 
mm. 

DISTRIBUTION. From the Red Sea and Madagascar to Hawaii, Tahiti, and 
Tuamotu. 

REMARKS. With the recognition by Holthuis (1953) of Chlorodiella cytherea 
among Pacific coral atoll collections and its reestablishment by Forest and 
Guinot (1961) upon firm morphological characters, it becomes possible to dis- 
tinguish four common C/lorodiella species in the Indo-west Pacific, the others 
being C. laevissima (Dana), with which the present species was formerly con- 
fused, C. nigra (Forskal), and C. barbata (Borradaile). The Easter Island 
specimen was seen and its identification confirmed by Mme. D. Guinot of the 
Paris Museum. 


Trapezia areolata Dana. 


Trapezia areolata DANA, 1852a, p. 83; 1852b, p. 259; 1855, pl. 15, fig. 8a (Tahiti) ; Forest and 
Guinot, 1961, p. 135, fig. 133 (Hikueru). 

Trapezia ferruginea areolata, ORTMANN, 1897, p. 206, synonymy. 

Trapezia reticulata STIMPSON, 1858, p. 37. 


Vol. XXXIX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 321 


MATERIAL EXAMINED. Hanga-piko, 2 February 1965, 2 males, 2 ovigerous 
females, collected by Norma (METEI). No station or date, 2 males, from the 
stomach of a large starfish collected by Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias and 
identified as Leiaster leachii by James Clark of Harvard University. SCUBA 
diving, coral reef, 8-10 meters, 8-9 August 1972, 1 male, V. A. Gallardo, EIP. 

MEASUREMENTS. Males measure 9.3 X 10.7, 9.5 X 10.8, 9.6 X 10.9, and 
12.1 X 13.7 mm., ovigerous females 9.8 X 12.2 and 12.1 X 15.0 mm. in length 
and width, respectively. 

DISTRIBUTION. From Ceylon and the Nicobar Islands to Tahiti and Tuamotu 
(Hikueru = Melville Island). 

Remarks. The large starfish from whose stomach the two males were col- 
lected, along with four specimens of Trapezia ferruginea Latreille, was presum- 
ably feeding on the corals with which the Trapezia species are invariably asso- 
ciated throughout their extensive range. 


Trapezia cymodoce (Herbst). 


Cancer cymodoce Hersst, 1801, p. 22, pl. 51, fig. 5 (East Indies). 


orf 


Trapesia cymodoce, GERSTAECKER, 1857, p. 125; ORTMANN, 1897, p. 203, synonymy; EpMonD- 
son, 1923, p. 20 (Palmyra). 

Grapsillus cymodoce, RATHBUN, 1906, p. 685, pl. 11, fig. 6 (Hawaii). 

Trapesia hirtipes JacQuiNoT and Lucas, 1853, p. 44, pl. 4, fig. 14 (Marquesas). 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Hanga-piko, 2 February 1965, 1 ovigerous female 
without chelipeds, collected by Norma (METEI). 

MEASUREMENTS. Ovigerous female: length of carapace 8.5 mm., width 
10.8 mm. 

DISTRIBUTION. From the Red Sea and Dar-es-Salaam to Tahiti and the 
Marquesas. Hawaii and the Line Islands (Palmyra). 

Remarks. Although no mention is made of an invertebrate host, the Tra- 
pezia species are customarily collected by cracking large heads of Pocillopora 
coral, of which three species, P. damicornis, P. danae, and P. diomedae, occur at 
Easter Island, according to Dr. John W. Wells of Cornell University. Trapeszia 
cymodoce is most readily distinguished from T. ferruginea by the fine woolly 
hair on the outer side of the palm of the cheliped. In the absence of chelipeds, 
reliance may be placed in the lateral teeth of the carapace, which are pointed even 
in grown specimens, according to Ortmann (1897). 


Trapezia danai Ward. 


Trapezia maculata Dana, 1852b, p. 256 (part); 1855, pl. 15, fig. 4d (mot 4a-c); Stmrpson, 
1860, p. 219 (Socorro Island). [Not Grapsilius maculatus MacLeay.] 

Trapesia danae Warp, 1939, p. 13, figs. 17, 18. [Name substituted for T. maculata Dana, pre- 
occupied by 7. maculata (MacLeay).] 

Trapesia aff. danai, SERENE, 1969, p. 136, figs. 14A, 14B, 15, 16, 21, 22, 24. 


322 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


MATERIAL EXAMINED. Easter Island, 8-10 meters, SCUBA diving, 9-10 
August 1972, one female, V. A. Gallardo, EIP. 

MEASUREMENTS. Female specimen, length of carapace 8.5 mm., width 
10.8 mm. 

DISTRIBUTION. Western Pacific at Samoa, Tahiti, and Hawaii; eastern 
Pacific doubtfully at Socorro Island; specimens sent to Stimpson by John Xantus 
probably were from Hawaii also. 

ReMaRKS. Since Dana’s material probably contained more than one species 
(Serene, 1969), it is with some hesitation that the name now applied to one of 
them is used here, as it is by no means certain that the Easter Island specimen, 
a female, is identical with either the Hawaiian or Tahitian specimens figured 
by Dana (1855). For the present, it can only be said that Easter Island supports 
a finely spotted species of Tvapezia resembling both T. danai Ward and T. wardi 
Seréne, yet differing in some particulars from each of them. A series of speci- 
mens, including males, will be needed to resolve the question. 


Trapezia ferruginea Latreille. 


Trapezia ferruginea LATREILLE, 1825, p. 695 (Red Sea) ; ORTMANN, 1897, p. 205, synonymy. 
Trapezia cymodoce ferruginea, RATHBUN, 1907, p. 58 (Easter Island) ; 1930, p. 557, pl. 228, 
figs. 1, 2 (Clarion Island); Boonr, 1927, p. 240, text-fig. 88 (Galapagos Islands) ; 

HErRTLEIN and Emerson, 1957, p. 5 (Clipperton Island). 

Trapezia miniata JAcQuINOT and Lucas, 1853, p. 43, pl. 4, fig. 10 (Marquesas). 

PREVIOUS COLLECTION. Easter Island, shore, 20 December 1904, 1 male, 1 
ovigerous female, A/batross (Rathbun, 1907). 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Easter Island, without precise locality or date, 3 
males, 1 ovigerous female, from the stomach of a large starfish collected by 
Tan E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias and identified as Leiaster leachii by James 
Clark: 

MEASUREMENTS. Males measure from 7.5 X 8.4 to 12.3 X 14.4 mm., oviger- 
ous female 8.7 X 11.4 mm. in length and width, respectively. 

DIstTRIBUTION. From the Red Sea and Zanzibar to Hawaii and the Marquesas 
in the western Pacific; Clarion, Clipperton, Easter, and Galapagos islands in 
the eastern Pacific; from the Gulf of California to Colombia on the American 
mainland. 

REMARKS. Tvrapezia ferruginea is one of two Indo-Pacific species of Tra- 
pezia known to occur on the west coast of tropical America, 7. digitalis Latreille 
being the other (Rathbun, 1930). Both are inhabitants of the Pocillopora coral 
colony but, whereas 7. ferruginea is bright red, T. digitalis is a somber brown. 
The latter species was not found among METEI collections, nor has it been 
reported from Easter Island. Rathbun, (1907), who considered T. ferruginea 
a subspecies of 7. cymodoce (Herbst), noted that the chelipeds of Easter Island 
specimens were covered with fine spots. 


Vol. XXXIX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 323 


Family GRAPSIDAE 
Geograpsus crinipes (Dana). 


Grapsus crinipes DANA, 1851, p. 249; 1852b, p. 341; 1855, pl. 21, figs. 6a—d (Sandwich Islands). 
Geograpsus crinipes, ORTMANN, 1894, p. 706 (Samoa); De Man, 1895, p. 83, pl. 28, figs. 
17a-c; EpMoNpDSON, 1923, p. 10 (Fanning, Palmyra) ; 1959, p. 162, fig. 4a; SAKAI, 1939, 

p. 652, pl. 107, fig. 2 (Japan), synonymy. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Poike, eastern peninsula of Easter Island, in a hole at 
an altitude of 250 m., 24 February 1956, 1 male, Thor Heyerdahl, collector 
(Oslo Museum). Tahai, 4 August 1972, T. Cekalovic, EIP. 

MEASUREMENTS. Male specimens: 38.7 X 45.1 and 47 X 55 mm., in length 
and breadth of carapace, respectively. 

DisTRIBUTION. Throughout the Indo-west Pacific from the Red Sea and 
Zanzibar to Japan, Samoa, Hawaii, and the Line Islands (Fanning, Palmyra). 

Remarks. The male specimen collected by the Heyerdahl Expedition lived 
for 19 days, or until 14 March 1956. It is not known whether the hole in which 
it was found contained water, or if so, whether this was fresh or brackish. The 
altitude at which the Easter Island specimen was collected serves to underscore 
the terrestriality of the species. In the Marshall Islands, which are low islands, 
Geograpsus crinipes occurs among litter on the forest floor and is seldom seen 
by day except when accidentally disturbed. 

The Oslo Museum specimen was identified by Dr. L. B. Holthuis of the 
Leiden Museum, who kindly forwarded the essential information for inclusion. 


Leptograpsus variegatus (Fabricius). 


Cancer variegatus FABRIctus, 1793, p. 450. 
Leptograpsus variegatus, MILNE Epwarps, 1853, p. 172; RATHBUN, 1907, p. 29 (Easter Island) ; 

1918, p. 234, pl. 36; Gartu, 1957, p. 94 (synonymy). 

Leptograpsus ansoni MILNE Epwarps, 1853, p. 171 (Juan Fernandez Island). 

PREVIOUS COLLECTIONS. Easter Island, shore, 16, 20 December 1904, 3 
males, 5 females. La Pérouse Bay, 17 December 1904, 7 males, 5 females, Al- 
batross (Rathbun, 1907). The single male reported by Rathbun (1907) with 
the date of 21 December 1899, is not presently on record at the U. S. National 
Museum and may have been part of a collection not involving the Albatross, 
which on the date in question was at sea between Fiji and Funafuti in the Ellice 
Islands on an earlier cruise that did not stop at Easter Island (F. A. Chace, 
Jr., personal communication). 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Near Hanga-Roa, Station F 42, 25-26 December 1964, 
2 males, 1 female, collected by children. Vaihu, Station F 94, 25 January 1965, 
rotenone collection in 6 to 10 feet of water, 1 male, soft shell, Ian E. Efford and 
Jack A. Mathias. Hanga-Roa, 5 February 1965, 1 female, without chelipeds, 
Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. Hanga-Roa Tai, 5 August 1972, 1 male, 
H. I. Moyano. 


324 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


MEASUREMENTS. Males measure from 21.8 X 24.5 to 43.5 X 50.5 mm., 
ovigerous female 30.1 * 34.2 mm., non-ovigerous female 44.2 X 49.8 mm. in 
length and width of carapace, respectively. 

DISTRIBUTION. Australia and New Zealand in the western Pacific; Easter 
Island and Juan Fernandez Island in the eastern Pacific; Peru and Chile on the 
west coast of South America. 

Remarks. In sub-tropical southern hemisphere areas from which Grapsus 
grapsus (Linnaeus) is absent, its dominance of the upper intertidal of rocky 
shores is assumed by Leptograpsus variegatus. It is therefore probable that the 
crabs observed in 1770 by Don Juan Hervé (1908, p. 122) and mentioned in the 
introduction of this paper were of this species, although the fact that he re- 
ferred to them as small crabs might indicate Pachygrapsus transversus (Gibbes) 
instead. Unlike Grapsus grapsus, which keeps to the supra-tidal level, Lepto- 
grapsus variegatus was reported by Lund University Chile Expedition collectors 
both in rocky crevices around high water level and in quiet water between 
boulders in the lower part of the littoral (Garth, 1957). Its presence in from 
6 to 10 feet of water at Easter Island would support the latter observation. 


Pachygrapsus transversus (Gibbes). 


Grapsus transversus GIBBES, 1850, p. 181. 
Pachygrapsus transversus, GIBBES, 1850, p. 182; RATHBUN, 1902, p. 279 (Galapagos) ; 1907, 
p. 29 (Easter Island) ; 1918, p. 244, pl. 61, figs. 2, 3, synonymy. 


PREVIOUS COLLECTION. Easter Island, shore, 16 December 1904, 1 female, 
Albatross (Rathbun, 1907). 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Hanga-Roa, 23 December 1964, 1 male, Ian E. Efford 
and Jack A. Mathias. Hanga-piko, tide pool, Station M 10, 31 December 1964, 
2 males, Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. Vaihu, tide pool, 3 January 1965, 
3 males, 2 females, Ian FE. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. 

MEASUREMENTS. Males measure from 5.2 X 6.3 to 11.8 X 14.5 mm., females 
5.2 X6.6 and 6.0 X 7.7 mm. in length and width of carapace, respectively. 

DISTRIBUTION. West coast of America from Gulf of California to Peru; 
Galapagos Islands; Easter Island. East coast of America from Florida to Ur- 
uguay; Bermuda. West coast of Africa from Mediterranean to northern Angola; 
Cape Verde Islands. 

REMARKS. Since the Indo-west Pacific species of Pachygrapsus, P. planifrons 
De Man and P. minutus A. Milne Edwards, were encountered by the Scripps 
International Geophysical Year (IGY) Expedition at Clipperton Island (Garth, 
1965), it was with interest that the writer verified from freshly collected METEI 
material the Easter Island record (Rathbun, 1907) of the amphi-American 
species, P. transversus (Gibbes). Thus, in the eastern North Pacific, as at 
Clipperton and Clarion islands, it is the western Pacific Pachygrapsus species 


Vol. XXXTX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 325 


that have gained foothold; in the eastern South Pacific, as at Galapagos and 
Easter islands, it is a New World Pachygrapsus species that has established itself. 


Ptychognathus easteranus Rathbun. 
Ptychognathus easterana RATHBUN, 1907, p. 31, pl. 2, fig. 4; pl. 7, figs. 4, 4a (Easter Island). 


PREVIOUS COLLECTION. Easter Island, shore, 20 December 1904, 1 male, 
Albatross (Rathbun, 1907). 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Hanga-piko, tide pool, Station M 10, 31 December 
1964, 1 young female, Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. 

MEASUREMENTS. Young female: length of carapace 4.2 mm., width 5.0 mm. 
The male holotype (USNM No. 32845) measured 10.6 mm. in length and 12.7 
mm. in width of carapace (Rathbun, 1907). 

DISTRIBUTION. Known only from Easter Island, where it was first collected 
by the U. S. Fish Commission Steamer Albatross in 1904. The genus ranges 
throughout the Indo-west Pacific. 

Remarks. The single young female collected by the METEI differs from 
the male holotype in being more straight-sided, thereby increasing its resem- 
blance to Ptychognathus polleni De Man (1895, p. 94, pl. 28, fig. 20a), and 
would not have been recognized as the same species as the male except for the 
external maxilliped, which is identical with the figure of Rathbun (1907). 


Cyclograpsus longipes Stimpson. 


Cyclograpsus longipes Stimpson, 1858, p. 105 (Bonin Islands); De Man, 1896, p. 355, pl. 
32, figs. 43a-c (Atjeh) ; RATHBUN, 1907, p. 36 (Tahiti, Tuamotu) ; SaKat, 1939, p. 690, 
synonymy; CAMPBELL and GRIFFIN, 1966, p. 139, key. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Shore above Vaihu, 25 January 1965, 2 males, 1 
female, Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. 

MEASUREMENTS. Male specimens: 4.6 X 5.7 and 5.4 X 7.0 mm.; female 
specimen: 7.0 X 8.8 mm. 

DistRIBUTION. Sumatra (Atjeh = Achin), Bonin Islands, Fiji Islands, 
Tahiti, and Tuamotu. 

Remarks. According to Campbell and Griffin (1966), Cyclograpsus longipes 
is distinguished from other Cyclograpsus species with entire anterolateral margins 
by having the lateral margins of the carapace straight and markedly divergent 
posteriorly, the epigastric lobes prominent, and the suborbital ridge interrupted 
two or three times. The Easter Island female differs from the two males in 
lacking the felted patch on the propodus of the second pair of walking legs and 
in having the suborbital ridge entire. In this respect it agrees with a larger 
series of eight males and three females from the Marshall Islands in the collec- 
tions of the Allan Hancock Foundation. 


326 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Plagusia dentipes De Haan. 
Plagusia dentipes DE HAAN, 1835, p. 58, pl. 8, fig. 1 (Japan); RATHBUN, 1907, p. 36 (Easter 

Island) ; SAKAI, 1939, p. 79, fig. 3, synonymy. 

PREVIOUS COLLECTION. Easter Island, shore, 21 December 1904, 2 males, 
1 female, Albatross (Rathbun, 1907). 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. Easter Island, near camp, January 1965, 1 male, 1 
female, Ilan E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias. 

MEASUREMENTS. Male specimen: length of carapace 38.5 mm., width 
41.6 mm.; female specimen: length 34.4 mm., width 36.7 mm. 

DISTRIBUTION. Japan and Formosa. Easter Island. Any continuity be- 
tween the two regions must be assumed, as records from intermediate localities 
are lacking. 

Remarks. The Easter Island specimens, while large, are not as large as 
a male from Simoda, length of carapace 44 mm., width 59.5 mm. (Sakai, 1939). 
Easter Island specimens were seen by Dr. Sakai, who confirmed their identity 
with Japanese specimens. The writer also had the privilege of examining two 
male and one female syntypes of von Siebold’s collecting in the collections of the 
Leiden Museum. 


Plagusia integripes Garth, new species. 
(Figures 1-6.) 

Type. Female holotype (AHF No. 6511), from shallow water off Hanga- 
Roa, Easter Island, 2 February 1965, Ian E. Efford and Jack A. Mathias, col- 
lectors (METEI). 

MEASUREMENTS. Female holotype: length of carapace 30.2 mm., width of 
carapace 31.1 mm., of front 6.2 mm., between inner orbital spines 12.2 mm., 
between exorbital spines 19.7 mm., length of chela 15.0 mm., of dactyl 8.4 mm. 

Diacnosis. Carapace tuberculate; three teeth behind external orbital angle. 
Coxae of walking legs entire: meri smooth anteriorly, a single spine subter- 
minally. Exognath of outer maxilliped without a flagellum. 

DESCRIPTION. Carapace roughened everywhere by low scabrous tubercles 
arranged in transverse rows and becoming more prominent on the slopes of the 
major elevations; intervening depressions free of tubercles but filled with a 
tomentum of short, stout, hooked hairs directed forward and inward. Larger 
tubercles distributed as follows: two pairs on the front, forming a square; one 
behind the orbit, one outer branchial, and one post lateral, each with one or more 
subordinate tubercles. Front with about eight tubercles on each side arranged 
in a forward-curving arc, the anterior three independent, the posterior five co- 
alesced; a blunt tooth on outer slope of inner orbital lobe. Anterolateral border 
with four strong teeth, including the exorbital tooth; teeth acute, directed for- 
ward, upward, and slightly inward, separated by broad U-shaped sinuses, and 
decreasing in size from first to last; last tooth considerably smaller than the 


Vol. XXXTX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 327 


oy ye? egiee ae 


 eaeeronmeane ee pi 


10mm 


10mm 


Ficure 1. Plagusia integripes Garth, new species, female holotype (AHF No. 6511), dorsal 
view. FicurE 2. Same, outer view of left cheliped. Ficure 3. Same, frontal view of orbital 
region. FicuRE 4. Same, left outer maxilliped. Ficure 5. Same, abdomen, restored. FIGURE 
6. Same, coxa of right third leg. Drawings by Carl Petterson. 


preceding tooth. Lower orbital margin continuous with epistome and similarly 
denticulate; epistome not readily divisible into lobes. Merus of outer maxilliped 
with a groove parallel to obliquely truncated anteroexternal margin; exognath 
lacking a flagellum. 

Chelipeds of the female (the male is not known) moderately robust, equal, 


328 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


tuberculate, and hairy; tubercles forming a weak crest backed by feathered 
setae along inner margins of merus, carpus, and manus, irregularly arranged 
on upper surface of carpus and manus, and forming rows along ridges leading 
to the dactyls on outer surface of palm; dactyls basally tuberculate, movable 
finger grooved, tips hollowed and meeting with a slight gape; hooked hairs in 
depressions of carpus and manus. 

Merus of walking legs with anterior crest entire, terminating in an acute 
spine or tubercle, fringed with plumose setae, and paralleled by a superior row 
of low tubercles; carpus and propodus similarly crested and fringed but lacking 
subterminal spine; dactylus short, curved, a double row of bristles internally, 
fringing hairs externally. Coxal lobes entire. 

Abdomen of unique female holotype crushed, but clearly showing the 7-seg- 
mented arrangement as restored in figure 5. 

RemMArKs. The new species from Easter Island allies itself with Plagusia 
depressa (Fabricius), P. glabra Dana, and P. speciosa Dana in having the meri 
of the walking legs smooth anteriorly and culminating in a single spine. Like 
them also it lacks the flagellum of the exognath of the third maxilliped found 
in Plagusia capensis De Haan and P. dentipes De Haan but in its place carries 
a tuft of setae. It may be distinguished from Plagusia depressa in all its forms 
by the denticulate lower margin of the orbit and inner margins of the merus, 
carpus, and propodus of the cheliped, the corresponding surfaces in that species 
being entire; by the flatter, more squarish carapace with clusters of sharp tu- 
bercles separated by patches of hooked setae, rather than low squamiform tu- 
bercles fringed with soft hair; and by the more robust chelae, at least in the 
female sex, the male of the species being unknown; and from P. d. depressa by 
the entire coxa of the walking legs (fig. 6), that of the nominate form being 
bidentate (cf. Rathbun, 1918, text-fig. 154a). 

The 2 holotype from Easter Island has been compared with each of the 
following: 


TYPE MATERIAL. 


Plagusia chabrus (Linnaeus), 2 neotype from Cape of Good Hope, H. B. van Horstok; 
Plagusia capensis De Haan, @ lectotype from Cape of Good Hope, H. B. van Horstok; 
the above one and the same specimen in the Leiden Museum. (cf. Griffin, 1968) 

Plagusia gaimardi Milne Edwards, 6 type from Tongatabu, Quoy and Gaimard; 

Plagusia tomentosa Milne Edwards, 34 and 19 syntypes, Cape of Good Hope, attributed 
to Latreille; 19 syntype, Cape of Good Hope, Delalande; both in the Paris Museum. 
[The above three probably synonyms of Plagusia chabrus. | 

Plagusia dentipes De Haan, 2¢ and 1Q syntypes, Japan, P. F. von Siebold, in the Leiden 
Museum. 


OTHER MATERIAL. 


Plagusia capensis De Haan, 4 and @ from Long Reef, Callaroy, New South Wales; 
Plagusia dentipes De Haan, é and @ from Easter Island; 
Plagusia depressa (Fabricius), ¢ and 2 from Cubagua Island, Venezuela; 


Vol. XXXIX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 329 


Plagusia depressa immaculata Lamarck, ¢ and @ from Cocos Island, Costa Rica; 

Plagusia depressa tuberculata Lamarck, @ from IJIheya Shima, Ryukyu Islands; 

Plagusia speciosa Dana, 2 from Apra Harbor, Guam; 2 from Clipperton Island. The above 
are in the collections of the Allan Hancock Foundation. 

Plagusia glabra Dana, 6 and 9 from Cogee, near Sydney, New South Wales. The above 
courtesy of The Australian Museum, Sydney. 


ZOOGEOGRAPHY 


The study of the Brachyura of the METEI clearly establishes Easter Island 
as the most easterly outpost of the Indo-west Pacific marine fauna in the South 
Pacific. As such it is comparable to Clipperton Island, an atoll at the same 
Longitude in the North Pacific, a relationship developed through the study of 
the Brachyura of the Scripps IGY Expedition (Garth, 1965). 

Easter Island species with ranges extending westward to the western margins 
of the Indian Ocean are the following: 


Dromidia unidentata (Ruppell) Red Sea, East Africa 
Car pilius convexus (Forskal) Red Sea, South Africa 
Liomera rugata (Milne Edwards) Red Sea, Mauritius 
Actaea parvula ( Krauss) Red Sea, Natal 
Lophozozymus dodone (Herbst) East Africa, Mauritius 
Etisus electra (Herbst) Red Sea, Mozambique 
Chlorodiella cytherea (Dana) Red Sea, Madagascar 
Trapezia cymodoce (Herbst) Red Sea, Dar-es-Salaam 
Trapezia ferruginea Latreille Red Sea, Zanzibar 
Geograpsus crinipes (Dana) Red Sea, Madagascar. 


Species with range extending westward to the Central Indian Ocean are 
the following: 


Pseudoliomera remota Rathbun Coetivy, Salomon 
Trapezia areolata Dana Ceylon, Nicobar Islands 
Trapezia danai Ward. 


Species with ranges extending westward to the western margins of the Pacific 
Ocean are the following: 


Portunus pubescens (Dana) Australia, Japan 
Thalamita species 

Leptograpsus variegatus (Fabricius) Australia, New Zealand 
Cyclograpsus longipes Stimpson Sumatra, Bonin Islands 
Plagusia dentipes De Haan Japan, Formosa. 


Species apparently endemic to Easter Island but representing Indo-west 
Pacific or Pan-tropical genera are the following: 


Ptychognathus easteranus Rathbun Plagusia integripes Garth, new species 


330 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Species with ranges extending eastward to the shores of the Americas are 
the following: 


Trapezia ferruginea Latreille Galapagos Islands, Bay of Panama 
Leptograpsus variegatus (Fabricius) Juan Fernandez Island, Chile 
Pachygrapsus transversus (Gibbes) Galapagos Islands, Peru 


It will be noted that the largest single segment are those that have negoti- 
ated the distance from the Red Sea to Easter Island, representing 210° of Longi- 
tude, or three-fifths of the circumference of the globe; also that the second 
largest segment are those that have negotiated the distance from Australia to 
Easter Island, representing 95° of Longitude, or one quarter of the circumference 
of the globe. On the other hand, only three species have successfully negotiated 
the distance from Chile to Easter Island, representing but 40° of Longitude, 
or one-ninth the circumference of the globe, and of these only one species, Pachy- 
grapsus transversus (Gibbes), appears to have made the crossing from east to 
west, since it alone has incontestible New World affinities. That the migration 
has proceeded predominantly in an easterly direction is apparent by the in- 
creasing impoverishment of Pacific islands in Asiatic species from west to east, 
without a corresponding enrichment in American species. In the case of the 
Pachygrapsus species, which are susceptible to transport by ships’ hulls and 
condensors, chance has determined the arrival and survival of P. transversus 
at Galapagos and Easter Island, as also of the western Pacific P. planifrons 
De Man and P. minutus A. Milne Edwards at Clarion and Clipperton in the 
northern hemisphere (Garth, 1965), again underscoring the randomness of in- 
sular dispersal. 

The nearest islands to the west from which brachyuran species may have 
reached Easter Island are Tahiti and Tuamotu. Fortunately, the fauna of 
these islands is comparatively well known through the recent monograph of 
Forest and Guinot (1961). 

Species common to islands immediately to the west of Easter Island are the 
following: 


Car pilius convexus (Forskal) Tahiti, Tuamotu 

Thalamita 

Liomera rugata (Milne Edwards) Tahiti, Tuamotu (Fakarava) 
Actaea parvula (Krauss) Marquesas 

Lophozozymus dodone (Herbst) Tahiti 

Etisus electra (Herbst) Tahiti, Tuamotu (Manga Reva) 
Chlorodiella cytherea (Dana) Tahiti, Tuamotu 

Trapezia areolata Dana Tuamotu (Hikueru = Melville) 
Trapezia cymdoce (Herbst) Tahiti, Marquesas 

Trapezia ferruginea Latreille Tahiti, Marquesas 


Cyclograpsus longipes Stimpson Tahiti, Tuamotu. 


Vol. XXXIX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 331 


There remain to be considered three species known only from localities 
remote from Easter Island, rather than from adjacent islands. These are Dro- 
midia unidentata (Ruppell), known in the Pacific from Japan, Hawaii, and 
the Kermadec Islands; Portunus pubescens (Dana), known from Japan, Hawaii, 
the Line Islands, and Australia; and Plagusia dentipes De Haan, known from 
Japan and Formosa. The Marquesas Islands, mentioned above, suggest a pos- 
sible migration route, since they lie northwest of Easter Island along an axis 
which, if projected, leads through the Line Islands (Christmas, Fanning, Wash- 
ington, and Palmyra) to Johnston and Midway islands, west of Hawaii. Such 
a direct dispersal route seems highly improbable, however, since it cuts across 
major ocean currents. The writer is inclined to favor, at least for the first two 
species mentioned, a southern hemisphere dispersal route eastward from Aus- 
tralia and would suggest a series of island stepping-stones for current-borne 
larval stages lying south of the Tropic of Capricorn: Lord Howe, Norfolk, 
Kermadec, Rapa, Morotiri (Bass), Pitcairn, Henderson, and Ducie. This island 
arc is completed to South America by Sala y Gomez, San Felix, and San Am- 
brosio. Juan Fernandez Islands, lying south as well as east of Easter Island, 
have but one brachyuran species found also at Easter Island, according to Balss 
(1924): Leptograpsus variegatus (Fabricius). The southern hemisphere island 
arc is much more probably involved in its trans-Pacific distribution than the 
hypothetical southern continent to which Balss (1924), following Arldt (1907, 
p. 114), took recourse. Evidence is constantly mounting to show that planktonic 
larvae of benthonic species, propelled by powerful currents, span greater oceanic 
distances than were once believed possible (Garth, 1966; Briggs, 1967; Scheltema, 
1968). Certainly, of all Pacific islands, with the possible exception of Clipperton 
in the north Pacific, the sweepstakes route to Easter Island puts this hypothesis 
to its severest test. 


LITERATURE CITED 


Acassiz, A. 
1906. Reports on the scientific results of the expedition to the eastern tropical Pacific, . . 
by the U. S. Fish Commission Steamer “Albatross,” from October, 1904, to 
March, 1905. . . V. General report of the expedition. Memoirs of the Museum 
of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, vol. 33, pp. (xili) 1-75. 
Atcock, A. 
1898. Materials for a carcinological fauna of India. No. 3. The Brachyura Cyclometopa. 
Part I. The family Xanthidae. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. 
67, pp. 67-233. 
1900. Materials for a carcinological fauna of India. No. 5. The Brachyura Primigenia, or 
Dromiacea. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. 68 (for 1899), pp. 
123-169. 
ARTEDT Ay; 
1907. Die Entwicklung der Kontinente und ihrer Lebewelt. Ein Beitrag zur vergleichen- 
den Erdgeschichte, pp. (xvii) 1-729. Leipzig. 


332 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Batss, H. 
1924. Decapoden von Juan Fernandez. Jn: C. Skottsberg (ed.), The natural history 
of Juan Fernandez and Easter Island, vol. 3, pp. 329-340. Uppsala. 
1938. Die Dekapoda Brachyura von Dr Sixten Bocks Pazifik-Expedition 1917-1918. 
Goteborgs Kungl. Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhalles Handlingar, femte 
foljden, ser. B, Band 5, no. 7, pp. 1-85. 
BARNARD, K. H. 
1950. Descriptive catalogue of South African decapod Crustacea. Annals of the South 
African Museum, vol. 38, pp. 1-837. 
Boone, LEE 
1927. The littoral crustacean fauna of the Galapagos Islands. I. Brachyura. Zoologica, 
vol. 8, pp. 127-288. 


1934. Scientific results of the world cruise of the yacht “Alva,” 1931, . . . Crustacea: 
Stomatopoda and Brachyura. Bulletin of the Vanderbilt Marine Museum, vol. 
5, pp. 1-210. 
Briccs, J. C. 


1967. Relationship of the tropical shelf regions. Studies in Tropical Oceanography, vol. 
5, pp. 569-578. 
CaMPBELL, B. M., and D. J. G. Grirrin 
1966. The Australian Sesarminae (Crustacea: Brachyura): genera Helice, Helograpsus 
nov., Cyclograpsus, and Paragrapsus. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 
vol. 14, pp. 127-174. 
CHILTON, C. 
1911. The Crustacea of the Kermadec Islands. Transactions of the New Zealand 
Institute, vol. 43 (for 1910), pp. 544-573. 
Dana, J. D. 
1851. Conspectus crustaceorum quae in orbis terrarum circumnavigatione, Carolo 
Wilkes e classe Reipublicae Foederatae duce, lexit et descripsit J. D. Dana. 
Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 5, pp. 
247-254; 267-272. 
1852a. [Same title.] Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 
vol. 6, pp. 73-86. 
1852b. Crustacea. Jn: United States Exploring Expedition during the years 1838, 1839, 
1840, 1841, 1842, under the command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., vol. 13, pp. 
(viii) 1-685. Philadelphia. 
1855. [Same title.] vol. 14, Atlas, pp. 1-27, pls. 1-96. 
Epmonpson, C. H. 
1922. Hawaiian Dromiidae. Occasional Papers of Bernice P. Bishop Museum, vol. 8, 
pp. 31-38. 
1923. Crustacea from Palmyra and Fanning Islands. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bul- 
letin, no. 5, pp. 1-43. 
1954. Hawaiian Portunidae. Occasional Papers of Bernice P. Bishop Museum, vol. 21, 


pp. 217-274. 

1959. Hawaiian Grapsidae. Occasional Papers of Bernice P. Bishop Museum, vol. 22, 
pp. 153-202. 

1962. Xanthidae of Hawaii. Occasional Papers of Bernice P. Bishop Museum, vol. 22, 
pp. 215-309. 


Fapricius, J. C. 
1793. Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta secundum classes, ordines, genera, 


Vol. XXXIX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 333 


species, adjectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus, vol. 2, 
pp. (viii) 1-519. Hafniae. 
Forest, J., and DANIELE GUINOT 
1961. Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures de Tahiti et des Tuamotu. Expédition francaise 
sur les récifs coralliens de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Volume préliminaire, pp. 


1-195. Paris. 
ForsKAL, P. 
1775. Descriptiones animalium avium, amphibiorum, piscium, insectorum, vermium, 
quae in itinere Orientali observavit P. Forskal . . . post mortem auctoris editit 
C. Niebuhr, pp. 1-164, 1 map. Hauniae. | Not seen.] 
GartH, J. S. 


1957. Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948-49. No. 29. The Crustacea 
Decapoda Brachyura of Chile. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift, n. f., Avd. 2, Bd. 
53, Nr. 7, pp. 1-128. 

1965. The brachyuran decapod crustaceans of Clipperton Island. Proceedings of the 
California Academy of Sciences, ser. 4, vol. 33, pp. 1-46. 

1966. On the oceanic transport of crab larval stages. Marine Biological Association 
of India, Proceedings of the Symposium on Crustacea, vol. 1, pp. 443-448. 

1971. Borradaile’s Maldivian collections revisited. Journal of the Marine Biological 
Association of India, vol. 11, pp. 182-190. 

GERSTAECKER, C. E. A. 

1857. Carcinologische Beitrage. Archiv fiir Naturgeschichte, vol. 22 (for 1856), pp. 

101-162. 
GresEs, L. R. 

1850. On the carcinological collections of the United States and an enumeration of the 
species contained in them, with notes on the most remarkable, and descriptions 
of new species. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement 
of Science, vol. 3, pp. 167-201. 

GrifFIN, D. J. G. 

1968. The designation of a neotype for Cancer chabrus Linnaeus and the status of 
Plagusia capensis De Haan (Decapoda, Grapsidae). Crustaceana, vol. 15, 
pp. 209-213. 

GuInoT, DANIELE 

1962. Sur une collection de Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures des iles Maldives et de 
Mer Rouge (Expédition “Xarifa’” 1957-1958). Kieler Meeresforschungen, vol. 
18, pp. 231-244. 

1964. Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures (Xanthidae) des campagnes de la Calypso en 
Mer Rouge (1952), dans le Golfe Persique et a l’Ile Aldabra (1954). Mémoires 
du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, nouvelle série, Série A, Zoologie, 
vol. 32, fase. 1, pp. 1-108 (iii). 

1967. Recherches préliminaires sur les groupements naturels chez les Crustacés Décapodes 
Brachyoures. III. A propos des affinités des genres Dairoides Stebbing et Daira 
De Haan. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire naturelle, ser. 2, vol. 39, 
pp. 540-563. 

1969. Sur divers Xanthidae, notamment sur Actaea De Haan et Paractaea gen. nov. 
(Crustacea Decapoda Brachyura). Cahiers du Pacifique, no. 13, pp. 222-267 

HAAN, W. DE 

1833-1850. Crustacea. Jn: P. F. von Siebold, Fauna Japonica, pp. (xvi) (xxxi) 1-244. 

Lugduni Batavorum. [For dates of publication see Holthuis, L. B., 1953, 


334 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History, vol. 3, pp. 
36-47.] 
HASWELL, W. A. 
1882. On some new Australian Brachyura. Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of 
New South Wales, vol. 6, pp. 540-551. 


HELteEr, C. 

1862. Neue Crustaceen, gesammelt wahrend der Weltumseglung der k. k. Fregatte 
“Novarra”. Zweiter vorlaufiger Bericht. Verhandlungen der _ kaiserlich- 
k6niglichen zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, vol. 12, pp. 519- 
528. 


1865. Crustaceen. Reise der Osterreichischen Fregatte Novara um die Erde in den 
Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859 unter den Befehlen des Commodore B. von Wiillerstorf- 
Urbair. Zoologischer Theil, zweiter Band, III. Abtheilung, pp. 1-280. 

Herest, J. F. W. 

1801. Versuch einer Naturgeschichte der Krabben und Krebse, nebst einer systema- 
tischen Beschreibung ihrer verschiedenen Arten, vol. 3, pt. 2, pp. 1-46. Berlin 
and Stralsund. 

HeErRTLEIN, L. G., and W. K. Emerson 

1957. Additional notes on the invertebrate fauna of Clipperton Island. American Mu- 

seum Novitates, no. 1859, pp. 1-9. 
HERVE, J. 

1908. Narrative of the expedition undertaken by order of His Excellency Don Manuel 
de Amat, Viceroy of Peru, in the ship San Lorenzo and the frigate Santa Rosalia, 
from the harbour of El Callao de Lima to the island of David, in 1770. In: 
B. C. Corney (ed.), The voyage of Captain Don Felipe Gonzalez in the ship 
of the line San Lorenzo, with the frigate Santa Rosalia in company, to Easter 
Island in 1770-1. Works of the Hakluyt Society, vol. 2, pp. (Ixxvii) 1-176. 
Cambridge. 

Hotrtuuts, L. B. 

1953. Enumeration of the decapod and stomatopod Crustacea from Pacific coral islands. 

Atoll Research Bulletin, vol. 24, pp. 1-66. [Mimeographed. ] 
Tate, J. E. W. 

1913. Die Decapoda Brachyura der Siboga-Expedition. I, Dromiacea. Siboga-Expeditie, 

monogr. 39b, livr. 71, pp. 1-96. 
Jacoutnot, H. 

1852. In: Hombron et Jacquinot, Voyage au Pole Sud et dans l’Océanie sur les corvettes 
“L?Astrolabe” et “La Zélée’ pendant les années 1837—1838-1839-1840 sous 
le commandement de M. Dumont d’Urville. . . Zoologie, Atlas, Crustacés, 
pls. 1-9. 

Jacqutnot, H., and H. Lucas 
1853. [Same title.] 3. Crustacés, pp. 1-107. 
KLUNZINGER, C. B. 

1913. Die Rundkrabben (Cyclometopa) des Roten Meeres. Nova Acta Akademie der 

Naturforscher Leopoldina-Carolina, Halle, vol. 99, pp. 97-402. 
KossMANN, R. 

1880. Zoologische Ergebnisse einer im Auftrage der k6éniglichen Academie der Wissen- 
schaften zu Berlin ausgefiihrten Reise in die Kiistengebiete des Rothen Meeres. 
Zweite Hialfte, II]. Malacostraca (II Theil: Anomura), pp. 67-140. Leipzig. 

Krauss, F. 
1843. Die Siidafrikanischen Crustaceen. Eine Zusammenstellung aller bekannten Mala- 


Vol. XXXIX] GARTH: BRACHYURAN CRABS 335 


costraca, Bemerkungen iiber deren Lebensweise und geographische Verbreitung, 
nebst Beschreibung und Abbildung mehrer neuen Arten, pp. 1-68. Stuttgart. 
LATREILLE, P. A. 

1825. Trapézie. Encyclopédie méthodique: Entomologie, ou Histoire naturelle des 

Crustacés, des Arachnides et des Insectes. vol. 10, pp. 695-696. 
Lenz, H. 

1910. Crustaceen von Madagaskar, Ostafrika und Ceylon. In: A. Voeltzkow, Reise 
in Ostafrika in den Jahren 1903-1905. . . ausgefiithrt von. . . A. Voeltzkow. 
Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse, vol. 2, Heft 5, pp. 539-576. Stuttgart. 

Man, J. G. DE 

1895. Bericht itiber die von Herrn Schiffscapitéan Storm zu Atjeh, an den westlichen 
Kisten von Malakka, Borneo und Celebes sowie in der Java-See gesammelter 
Decapoden und Stomatopoden. Zoologische Jahrbiicher, Abtheilung fiir Sys- 
tematik, vol. 9, pp. 75-218. 

1896. [Same title.] Zoologische Jahrbiicher, Abtheilung fiir Systematik, vol. 9, pp. 
339-386. 

MILNE Epwarps, A. 

1865. Etudes zoologiques sur les Crustacés récents de la famille des Cancériens. Premiére 
Partie. Cancérides. Pirimélides. Carpilides. Nouvelles Archives du Muséum 
d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, vol. 1, pp. 177-308. 

1873. Recherches sur la faune carcinologique de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. II. Cyclometopes. 
Nouvelles Archives du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, vol. 9, pp. 155-332. 

MILneE Epwarps, H. 

1853. Mémoire sur la famille des Ocypodiens. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, sér. 

3, Zoologie, vol. 20, pp. 163-228. 
Nosrrt, G. 

1907. Ricerche sui Crostacei della Polinesia. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle 

Scienze di Torino, ser. 2, vol. 57, pp. 351-430. 
ODHNER, T. 

1925. Monographierte Gattungen der Krabbenfamilie Xanthidae. I. Goteborgs Kungl. 
Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets- Samhalles Handlingar, Fjarde foljden, vol. 29, 
no. 1, pp. 1-92. 

OrTMANN, A. E. 

1893. Die Decapoden-Krebse des Strassburger Museums. VII. Brachyura. II. Cy- 
clometopa. Zoologische Jahrbiicher, Abtheilung fiir Systematik, Geographie 
und Biologie der Thiere, vol. 7, pp. 411-495. 

1894. Die Decapoden-Krebse des Strassburger Museums. VIII. Brachyura. III. Cat- 
ometopa. Zoologische Jahrbiicher, Abtheilung fiir Systematik, vol. 7, pp. 
683-772. 

1897. Die geographische Verbreitung der Decapoden-Familie Trapeziidae. Zoologische 
Jahrbiicher, Abtheilung fiir Systematik, vol. 10, pp. 201-216. 

RaTHBUN, Mary J. 

1902. Papers from the Hopkins-Stanford Expedition, 1898-1899. VIII. Brachyura and 
Macrura. Proceedings of the Washington Academy of Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 
275-292. 

1906. The Brachyura and Macrura of the Hawaiian Islands. Bulletin of the United 
States Fish Commission, vol. 23 (for 1903), pp. 827-930. 

1907. Reports on the Scientific results of the expeditions to the tropical Pacific .. . 
by the United States Fish Commission Steamer “Albatross”. . . IX, X. The 


336 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 47TH SER. 


Brachyura. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard 
College, vol. 35, pp. 23-74. 

1911. The Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905, under the 
leadership of Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner. XI. Marine Brachyura. Transactions 
of the Linnaean Society of London, ser. 2, Zoology, vol. 14, pp. 191-261. 

1918. The grapsoid crabs of America. United States National Museum, bull. 97, pp. 
(xxii) 1461. 

1930. The cancroid crabs of America of the families Euryalidae, Portunidae, Atelecy- 
clidae, Cancridae, and Xanthidae. United States National Museum, bull. 152, 
pp. (xvi) 1-609. 

RUPpPELL, E. S. 

1830. Beschreibung und Abbildung von 24 Arten kurzschwanzigen Krabben, als Beitrag 
zur Naturgeschichte des Rothen Meeres. Pp. 1-28. Frankfurt am Main. [Not 
seen. | 

SAKAI, T. 

1934. Brachyura from the coast of Kyushu, Japan. Science Reports of the Tokyo 
Bunrika Daigaku, sect. B, vol. 1, pp. 281-330. 

1936. Studies on the crabs of Japan. I. Dromiacea. Science Reports of the Tokyo 
Bunrika Daigaku, sect. B, vol. 3, suppl. 1, pp. 1-66. 

1939. [Same title.] IV. Brachygnatha, Brachyrhyncha. Pp. 365-741. Tokyo. 

SCHELTEMA, R. S. 

1968. Dispersal of larvae by equatorial ocean currents and its importance to the zoo- 

geography of shoal-water tropical species. Nature, vol. 217, pp. 1159-1162. 
SERENE, R. 

1969. Observations on species of the group Tvrapezia rufopunctata-maculata, with 
a provisional key for all the species of Trapezia. Journal of the Marine Bio- 
logical Association of India, vol. 11, pp. 126-148. 

STEPHENSON, W., and B. CAMPBELL 

1959. The Australian portunids (Crustacea: Portunidae). III. The genus Portunus. 

Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, vol. 10, pp. 84-124. 
STIMpPSoN, W. 

1858. Prodromus descriptionis animalium evertebratorum quae in Expeditione ad 
Oceanum Pacificum Septentrionalem, a Republica Federata missa, Cadwaladaro 
Ringgold et Johanne Rodgers Ducibus, observavit et descripsit. V. Crustacea 
Ocypodoidea. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 
vol. 10, pp. 93-110. 

1860. Notes on North American Crustacea in the Museum of the Smithsonian Insti- 
tution. II. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York, vol. 7, pp. 
176-246. 

Warp, M. 

1939. The Brachyura of the Second Templeton Crocker-American Museum Expedition 

to the Pacific Ocean. American Museum Novitates, no. 1049, pp. 1-15. 


iy | ) 


PROCEEDINGS —f “7/2. Biological Labor, 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES / © 


FOURTH SERIES Wit 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 18, pp. 337-382; 13 figs.; 5 tables. October 24, 1973 


TWO NEW STONEFISHES (PISCES, 
SCORPAENIDAE) FROM THE INDO-WEST 
PACIFIC, WITH A SYNOPSIS OF THE 
SUBFAMILY SYNANCEIINAE 


By 
William N. Eschmeyer 


California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118 


and 


Kaza V. Rama Rao 
Zoological Survey of India, 10 Leith Castle South Street, Madyas-28, India 


ABSTRACT. Two new stonefishes are described and placed tentatively in the genus 
Synanceia. A discussion of the limits of the subfamily Synanceiinae is given, and 
six genera (Synanceia, Erosa, Dampierosa, Trachicephalus, Leptosynanceia, and 
Pseudosynanceia) are recognized. Related genera are discussed as are nomenclatural 
problems. Brief descriptions and illustrations are provided for the species referable 
to the scorpionfish subfamily Synanceiinae. 


INTRODUCTION 


The common name ‘stonefishes’ is applied here to all members of the scor- 
pionfish subfamily Synanceiinae, although the name is more commonly used 
only for the fishes of the genus Synanceia. Species of the genus Synanceia are 
the most venomous of fishes, capable of causing death in man (see Halstead, 
1970). Despite the interest in stonefishes, the species are poorly known, and 
it is of interest that two new species have been found. The new species are 
referred tentatively to the genus Synanceia, and their large venom glands sug- 
gest that they may be just as venomous as the better-known and larger-sized 
species Synanceia horrida and S. verrucosa. Generic allocation of the new spe- 
cies necessitated an examination of other genera and species believed to be 
related to the genus Synanceia. The genera referable to the subfamily Synancei- 
inae contain few species and most of the species (nine or ten) are rarely en- 


[337] 


338 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


countered, so that it was thought desirable to provide a brief synopsis of the 
subfamily. Fishes of the subfamily Synanceiinae are restricted to the warm 
waters of the Indo-West Pacific faunal region. Some species are found on reefs, 
but other members of the subfamily occur on muddy or sandy bottoms in 
marine and brackish waters. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


Specimens of the two new species were obtained from five sources: The 
United States National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Stanford Uni- 
versity (SU) (collection now housed at the California Academy of Sciences 
(CAS) ), the Zoological Survey of India (ZSI), the American Museum of Natu- 
ral History (AMNH), and a collection made by Victor G. Springer in the Red 
Sea as a part of a joint project of the United States National Museum of Natu- 
ral History and the Hebrew University in Jerusalem (HUJ), Israel. We are 
indebted to Springer and the late Dr. H. Steinitz for the loan of this Red Sea 
material. William Smith-Vaniz first brought to Eschmeyer’s attention one of 
the new species in 1967. A. G. K. Menon (ZSI) provided information on a 
specimen in his care. Depositories of specimens other than those listed above 
include the British Museum of Natural History (BMNH), Rijksmuseum van 
Natuurlijke Historie (RMNH), Australian Museum, Sydney (AMS), Zoologi- 
cal Institute, University of Tokyo (ZIUT), and the Academy of Natural Sci- 
ences of Philadelphia (ANSP). Assistance by the staffs of these institutions 
has been most generous, and we especially thank A. Wheeler, M. Boeseman, J. 
Paxton, T. Abe, J. Atz, D. Rosen, and J. Bohlke for their assistance. Lillian J. 
Dempster has offered valuable help in the preparation of this and other papers 
on scorpionfishes. Her assistance with literature, selection of new scientific 
names, and editorial comments have been substantial. Support for this study 
came from the National Science Foundation grant GB-15811. A visiting scien- 
tist fellowship provided by the California Academy of Sciences allowed Rama 
Rao to participate in this study. The drawings were made by Katherine Smith. 
M. Giles, W. Freihofer, P. Sonoda, T. Iwamoto, J. Gordon, F. Steiner, B. Wese- 
mann, C. Pape, and K. Boyer assisted in the project. 


METHODS 


Methods follow those used by Eschmeyer (1969). Most scorpionfishes have 
the last two elements in the dorsal and anal fins united or close together at 
their bases and usually they are supported by a single pterygiophore. In the 
subfamily Synanceiinae, however, species of some genera have the last element 
single, well separated from the previous ray, and supported by its own pterygio- 
phore. To distinguish between these two conditions the addition of ‘'2” or 
the statement ‘last double” implies that the last soft ray is a double one and 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 339 


the absence of “2” or the statement “last single” indicates that the last ele- 
ment is separate soft ray. In these fishes there is no depression or pit where 
the premaxillaries join, so measurements originating from the anterior end are 
taken from the symphysis of the premaxillaries. 


Subfamily SYNANCEIINAE 


The limits of this subfamily are in doubt. Bleeker (1874) included Pelor 
|= Inimicus|, Synanceia, Leptosynanceia, and Polycaulus |= Trachicephalus | 
in a family Synanceiidae (his “Synanceioidei’”’). J. L. B. Smith (1958) included 
the genera Minous, Inimicus, Choridactylus, Synanceia, and Synanceichthys in 
the family Synanceiidae (his ‘“‘Synanciidae”) for western Indian Ocean species. 
De Beaufort (#7 Weber and de Beaufort, 1962) included Synanceia, Lepto- 
synanceia, Polycaulus, Inimicus, and Minous in the family Synanceiidae (his 
“Synanceidae”) for Indo-Australian species. Matsubara (1943) treated Minous 
as a separate subfamily Minoinae, /nimicus as a separate subfamily Pelorinae, 
and studied only Synanceia verrucosa as a representative of the subfamily 
Synanceiinae. The genus Erosa is thought by us to be related to Synanceia; 
Matsubara (1943) treated the genus Erosa as a separate subfamily Erosinae. 
Non-Japanese genera were not studied by Matsubara. 

At the present time we suggest the following allocation of these genera and 
their synonyms (see also generic synonymies in text for additional synonyms): 
Synanceiinae: Synanceia (including Synanceichthys), Leptosynanceia, Trachicepha- 

lus [Polycaulus a synonym], Pseudosynanceia, Erosa, and Dampierosa. 
Inimicinae (synonym Pelorinae): IJnimicus [Pelor a synonym] (including Choris- 
mopelor), Choridactylus (including Choridactyloides) . 

Minoinae: Minous (including Corythobatus, Decterias, Lysodermus, and Para- 

minous ). 

Species of the subfamily Minoinae are characterized externally by the pres- 
ence of a free lower pectoral ray in each fin, while the species in the subfamily 
Inimicinae have two (/nimicus) or three (Choridactylus) free pectoral rays. 
(The monotypic genus Cheroscorpaena (Mees, 1964) has three free pectoral fin 
rays; subfamilial placement of this genus is uncertain, but it probably belongs 
near the distinctive genus A pistus.) Species of the subfamilies Minoinae and 
Inimicinae will be treated in subsequent articles. 

One feature which might prove to be important in the classification of these 
fishes at the subfamilial level and below is the presence of what appear to be 
skin glands or organs. These apparently pored structures tend to be scattered 
over the body in fishes of the subfamily Synancelinae. They are present in rows 
(usually above the anal fin or below the dorsal fin) in some genera, and in 
Synanceia, Erosa, and Dampierosa they are reflected as warts. In the subfamily 
Inimicinae these glands are concentrated in a widely spaced row above the 


340 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


lateral line and in a patch behind the head. In the subfamily Minoinae, and 
presumably in other scorpaenoid fishes, they are absent. Frequently the glands 
contain a brown, hardened, wax-like substance in preserved specimens. A tiny 
buried scale accompanying each gland can be seen in alizarin-stained speci- 
mens. We do not know the function of these glands and have not studied them 
in detail. 

The following trends are noted for the subfamily Synanceiinae: 


1. Dorsal spines increase from 12 to 17 (occasionally 11 spines in those species 
which normally have 12 spines). 

2. Dorsal soft rays decrease from 9 (10) to 4, but increase to 12-14 in one 

genus. 

Fin spines change from firm and strong to flexible. 

Pelvic rays are reduced from I+ 5 to I1+3. 

Pectoral fin rays decrease from about 18 or 19 to 11. 

Eyes move to the dorsal surface of head; eyes become smaller. 

Mouth shifts to a superior position. 

Swimbladder is lost. 

Vertebrae increase from 24 to about 30. 


oon an nn SP W 


The definition of genera within the subfamily Synanceiinae is difficult, par- 
ticularly because of the (probably ‘rapid’) evolution of certain features listed 
above as trends. For example, Synanceia is sometimes restricted to S. horrida, 
and Synanceichthys to S. verrucosa (as verrucosus) (Smith, 1958, p. 173). 
These 2 species and a presumed (by de Beaufort) hybrid (S. platyrhynchus) 
were treated in the genus Synanceia by de Beaufort (72 Weber and de Beaufort, 
1962); Whitley (1930) placed ‘platyrhynchus’ in its own subgenus Nofua. The 
two new species described here further complicate this. One of the new species 
has 11 pectoral rays, and the other normally 14 rays, while ‘platyrhynchus’ has 
17, ‘horrida, 15-17, and ‘verrucosa,’ 18-19. Furthermore, one of the new species 
has the pelvic rays reduced to I + 4, as do some specimens referable to ‘horrida.’ 
Given certain trends which occur in the subfamily, we do not feel that these 
differences are so important and we have expanded the genus Synanceia. We treat 
the genera Evosa, Dampierosa, Trachicephalus, Pseudosynanceia, and Lepto- 
synanceia as monotypic, although more than one nominal species exists for some 
of these genera. Subsequent workers may wish to unite Erosa and Dampierosa 
in one genus. 


SUBFAMILY DIAGNOsIS. Scales absent; no free pectoral rays; skin glands 
present (appearing as ‘warts’ in some genera); dorsal spines 11—17, dorsal soft 
rays 4-14 (last single or double); anal spines normally 2—4 (difficult to dis- 
tinguish spines from soft rays in some species), anal soft rays 4-14, total anal 
spines and rays 7-16; pelvic rays I+ 5, 1+ 4, or 1+ 3; pectoral rays 11-19; 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 341 


second suborbital bone (= third infraorbital) broad, not T-shaped, attached to 
preopercle; third and fourth suborbital (fourth and fifth infraorbital) bones 
absent; vertebrae 23 to 30. 


Key TO THE GENERA AND SPECIES OF THE SUBFAMILY SYNANCEIINAE 


1. Mouth terminal, only slightly oblique; eyes placed laterally on head, directed out- 


STAT, C1 Smee eee ee pt na ee Se ee ee 2 
Mouth vertical or superior; eyes on dorsal surface of head, directed outwards and 
Tip waALrdsmorcompletely* upwards 2. 6 eee eS 3 
2. Dorsal spines 14; dorsal soft rays 544 to 64, usually 614; anal spines 3; anal soft 
rays 514 to 64, usually 514; pectoral fin rays 14-16, usually 15 _._. Erosa erosa 
Dorsal spines 12 (possibly 13); dorsal soft rays 914 (possibly 844); anal spines 2; 
pectoral fin rays 12 (11 or 13 should be expected) ___-__.-_-_ Dampierosa daruma 
See DOLsalmspimes: 0; Ob TOLe, 2 el ee 4 
Worsalespines: Wl—14s . Sess he a ee ee ee ee ee ee ee 5 
Amehewmicninewith spine and! 3 soft rays) 22 Pseudosynanceia melanostigma 
Pelwicmtinewithe laspine and) 4 soft rays == 5 es Leptosynanceia asteroblepa 
5. Anal fin with 3 spines and 414% (5) to 6% (7) soft rays, total anal fin elements 
(10) 2A Sp. Se ee ee ee ee i ee ee 6 


Anal fin with 2 spines and 12-14 soft rays, total anal fin elements 14-16 _.-_ 
En Selene Se ee ee ee _ Trachicephalus uranoscopus 


6. (3 choices) Pectoral fin rays 11 (10 or 12 should also be expected) — Synanceia alula 
Pectoral fin rays 14, rarely 15 (13 should be expected; one type specimen with 15 on 

neem GMO TMNT et) ee oe Be as ee eee Synanceia nana 

Pectoral fin rays 15 or more (if 15 or 16, eyes will have a crest above them) —_ 7 

7. Pectoral fin rays 18-19; no bony crest above eye _______ Synanceia verrucosa 

Pectoraletin rays 15-17; bony crest present above eye —= = == 8 


8. Ridge connecting eyes across interorbit continuous, with no break in middle —___ 
a a Rr ED SV NONGCIURNONILOW 

Eyes nearly connected by a bony ridge across interorbit but with a concavity at 
Gentemlianspeciesot sumcertain) statusi]| = ==" Synanceia platyrhynchus 


Genus Synanceia Bloch and Schneider 


Synanceia Biocu and SCHNEIDER, 1801, p. xxxvii (brief description; listed species; type- 
species Scorpaena horrida Linnaeus by subsequent designation of Jordan, 1919, p. 58). 

Synanceja BLocu and SCHNEIDER, 1801, p. 194 (brief description; species descriptions; mis- 
print for Synanceia [corrected in corrigenda on p. 573, see ‘Nomenclatural remarks’]). 

Synanchia SwAINson, 1839, pp. 61, 180-181 (unjustified emendation of Synanceia [see ‘No- 
menclatural remarks’]; three subgenera). 

Bufichthys Swatnson, 1839, p. 268 [but not pp. 180-181] misprint for Synanchia [see ‘No- 
menclatural remarks’]). 

Synancidium MULier, 1843, p. 302 (type-species Scorpaena horrida Linnaeus by subsequent 
designation of Swain [see ‘Nomenclatural remarks’]; Miiller proposed the genus for 
“Synanceia mit Vomerzahnen”). 

Synancydium, AcAssiz, 1845, p. 63 (unjustified emendation of Synancidium Miiller). 

Synanceichthys BLEEKER, 1863, p. 234 (type-species Synanceia verrucosa = Synanceta brachio 
by original designation). 

Emmydrichthys JorpAN and RuTTER in Jordan, 1896, pp. 221-222 (type-species Emmydrich- 
thys vulcanus Jordan and Rutter by monotypy). 


342 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Nofua WuitLry, 1930, p. 24 (as a subgenus of Synanceja [sic]; type-species Synanceia 
platyrhynchus Bleeker by original designation). 
Deleastes SEALE, 1906, pp. 80-81 (type-species Deleastes daector by original designation). 


NOMENCLATURAL REMARKS. Much confusion exists over the spelling of this 
genus and its various synonyms, as well as the subfamily spelling. The genus is 
spelled Synanceja by many recent authors (e.g., Smith, Whitley, de Beaufort), 
but the correct spelling is clearly Synanceia. In the original description Bloch 
and Schneider, on page xxxviil, spell the name as Synanceia, on page 194 they 
spell it Synanceja, and in plate 45 Synanceia; in their “corrigenda” on page 573 
they state ‘“‘|page| 194. genus 50. scribe: Synanceia.” Subsequent workers who 
have commented on this problem missed the corrigenda (e.g., Briggs, 1961, p. 
164). 

Gill (1905, p. 221, et seqq.) said of the problem of the genus Synanceia and 
some other genera, “Complication has resulted by reason of the intrusion of the 
incompetent Swainson into the field.’ Swainson (1839) did add considerable 
confusion, but this uncertainty easily can be resolved. As discussed by Gill, 
Swainson attempted to reclassify the ““Synanceines” and named three subgenera, 
but in three places (1839: pp. 61, 180-181, and 268) Swainson variously inter- 
changed names and diagnoses. Gill summarized the equivalent categories as 
follows: 


p. 61 pp. 180-181 p. 268 
Erosa = Bufichthys = Synanchia Cuvier (species erosa) 
Synanchia == Synanchia = Bufichthys (species horrida and grossa) 


Trichophasia = Trachicephalus = Trachicephalus (species elongatus) 


Gill allocated the individual treatments by Swainson to the genera Synanceia 
and Erosa of other authors. Trichophasia and Trachicephalus were synonymized 
by Gill and he serves as first revisor selecting Trachicephalus over Trichophasia. 
Problems remain only for Swainson’s subgenera Evrosa, Synanchia, and Bufich- 
thys. Authors, e.g. Swain (1882), Jordan and Starks (1904), Jordan (1919), 
and Whitley (1930), as well as Gill, consider Swainson’s Synanchia an emenda- 
tion of Synanceia, although Bleeker (1874, pp. 4,11) indicated that the species 
‘erosa could be placed in Synanchia of Swainson. Synanchia is an unjustified 
emendation and cannot be used as a separate genus for the species ‘erosa’ as by 
Bleeker (see Gill, 1905). It is clear from Swainson’s text (but not from p. 268) 
that he intended first Erosa and then Bufichthys for the species ‘erosa. It 
therefore appears that on page 268 Swainson switched the two headings Bufich- 
thys and Synanchia (compare particularly his diagnosis and subgeneric cate- 
gories on pp. 180-181 with p. 268). 

Swain (1882, p. 277), in his review of Swainson’s genera, dealt only with 
the entries on Swainson’s pages above 200 (7.e., p. 268 but not pp. 61 or 180— 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 343 


181) and was therefore not aware of the switched headings. Unlike Gill, Swain 
referred Bufichthys to Synancia |Synanceia| and selected ‘horrida’ as the type- 
species of Bufichthys. But Bufichthys p. 268 is really Synanceia while Bufich- 
thys on p. 181 is really Erosa. Swain’s selection of ‘korrida’ as the type of 
Bufichthys of p. 268 does not affect the type-species for Bufichthys on p. 181. 
The type-species of Bufichthys is really ‘erosa’ by monotypy. (It does appear 
that Swain was in fact the first to select the type-species ‘korrida’ for Synanci- 
dium Miiller; see Swain’s footnote 4 on p. 277; Jordan, 1919, also regarded 
‘horrida’ as the type-species of Synancidium Miller.) 

Bufichthys Swainson (on p. 181) is the original generic description of 
Bufichthys, and Gill (1905, p. 223) serves as the first revisor selecting the 
genus Erosa Swainson (p. 61) over Bufichthys. This interpretation seems to 
have been the aim of Swainson and corresponds to current usage. 

GENERIC DIAGNOsIS. Dorsal fin normally with 13-14 spines and 4%2-5 to 
74-8 soft rays (last ray usually double); anal fin normally with 3 spines and 
4%-5 to 6'~7 soft rays (last soft ray usually double); pectoral fin rays 11-19; 
pelvic fin rays I+ 5, or I+ 4 in some specimens and in one species; mouth 
vertical; eyes directed mostly upwards; vertebrae usually 24; swimbladder 
absent; body covered with warts. 

Remarks. The limits of the genus Syvanceia are discussed in the subfamily 
section and reasons for placing some of the nominal genera in the synonymy of 
Synanceia are discussed above. 

The genus Emmydrichthys Jordan and Rutter was based on a specimen of 
S. verrucosa with an abnormal dorsal fin. Deleastes was established by Seale 
for a species which he thought had shorter pelvic fins, pelvic fins located more 
posteriorly, and a smoother skin (see our account of S. verrucosa). 


Synanceia nana Eschmeyer and Rama Rao, new species. 
(Figures 1-2; tables 1, 3-5.) 
No literature applies to this species. 

HoLotyPE. USNM 209417 (a specimen 73.2 mm. in standard length), Red 
Sea, Israel, northwest coast of the Gulf of Aqaba, bay at El Himeira, depth of 
capture to 18 meters, Victor G. Springer and assistants, 1100-1230 and 1315— 
1415 hours, 16 July 1969. 

ParATYPES. CAS 14991 (1, 47.8), taken with the holotype; CAS 14992 (2, 
21.3-39.7) and HUJ uncatalogued (1, 70.5), Red Sea, Israel, Gulf of Aqaba, 
bay at El Himeira, in 9-12 meters, Victor G. Springer and assistants, 0945— 
1215 hours, 8 September 1969; USNM 209418 (1, 24.0), Red Sea, Israel, Gulf 
of Aqaba, between Marset Mahash el Ala and Marset Abu Samra, 32 kilometers 
as road goes south of Marine Laboratory, in depths to 3.5 meters, Victor G. 
Springer and assistants, 1030-1300 hours, 2 September 1969; USNM 209419 


[Proc. 4TH Serr. 


ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


CALIFORNIA 


344 


‘BIG pay “TS “wu ¢/ ‘JT P60Z WNSQ ‘edAjofoy ‘punu piaounucs 


‘| quae 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 345 


Ficure 2. Drawing of head of Synanceia nana, based mostly on the holotype, 73 mm. 
Sl. 


(1, 52.8), Red Sea, Gulf of Suez, Et-Tur, Sinai Peninsula, 100 kilometers north 
of Sharm el Sheikh as road goes, depths to 9 meters, Victor G. Springer and 
assistants, 1015-1315 hours, 27 September 1969; CAS 14993 (1, 71.5), Red 
Sea, Gulf of Suez, off Port Safaga, 27°16’15’”N., 33°47’30”E., in 3 meters, H. A. 
Fehlmann and H. K. Badwi, 6 January 1965; AMNH 18385 (1, 102), Saudi 
Arabia, Persian Gulf, Tarut Bay, near Ras Tanura spit, R. Bowen, July 1947. 

DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Dorsal XIV—XV (usually XIV) + 5; anal III 
+ 4 to 6 (usually ITI + 5); pectoral 14-15(16), usually 14; pelvic I+ 5; head 
broad, depressed, with pits; no large pit below eye; deep depression between 
eyes; rectangular depression on occiput. 

DEscriPpTION. Dorsal fin with 14 spines (15 in one specimen); all spines 
short, nearly the same length, with thick skin covering the venom glands. Dor- 
sal soft rays 5, all unbranched. Anal fin with 3 spines, first very short. Anal 
soft rays 4—6, usually 5, last single, all unbranched. Pectoral fin rays 14-15 (16 
on one side in 1 specimen), usually 14, all unbranched. Pelvic fin with 1 spine 
and 5 unbranched soft rays. Gill rakers rudimentary, total 7-10, 0-2 on upper 
arch, 7-8 on lower arch. Lateral line with 10-12 tubes (including one on 
caudal), lateral line pores paler than nearby ‘warts’ in smaller specimens. Ver- 
tebrae 24 (7 specimens), or 23? (1), or 25 (1). 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


346 


uly Jo diy 0} Avi JaMOT JO aseq WoT] , 


(o¢) TT (O€) 8°02 (1¢) SOT Gi sey, (8Z) 0°02 (62) ¢ IT (Z£) 8°9 (LZ) O'eT (Te) $22 Yysue, Uy TAI 
(8S) $'6S (6h) 9'rE (€£$) 082 (vr) 9'OT (ZS) TLE (OS) 002 (6h) S'OT (pS) 4°82 (SS) O'€h x4ISus, uly [e10p0q 
(1£) Oz (62) $02 (O€) 9ST (62) O'4 (62) O'1Z (O€) 1°21 (62) 79 (6Z) O'VT (T€) $72 Yus, uly [es1opaig 
(61) O'6T CO re21 (41) 76 (ST) s¢ (81) $°2I (81) OZ (91) se (41) 0'8 (Mast yysuey mel 
CoD sic (Or) 89 (60) 8'F (CAD) 3a Gis (80) e¢ (60) 0°2 (OL) Sr (OL) $4 WAPI [epWq1O19}UT 
(CHEE) Si (40) o's (60) O's (90) $I (80) ss CLOVE (90) ¢'T (60) Zr (60) $°9 yysue] ynoug 
($0) Lv (v0) $°Z (SO) 8°Z (90) ST (70) T'€ (+0) +'T (70) 80 (sO) €°2 (sO) 9’¢ JI}IWIP GIO 
(6¢) 9'6E (¢€€) O'€Z Ge) 7st (S€) +8 Cee sez (€€) 7 eT (ss OF/4 (9€) 7 LT (8¢) 0°82 yjdep Apog 
(Tr) &2r (4) 7°92 (8£) 0°02 (S€) 16 (6£) O'8Z tS) aa (s¢) 08 (8£) OST (Or) 0°62 yysue, peo] 
SZ v2 d€Z $2 +2 v2 +2 +Z +2 aviqayia A 
Coal cer ecnieccieeeccth Sa Deeeccaelecte te  SaeheG-l | SN SaT SE‘Sa-p S-LStl Sai Soe SABI IIAP 
OTST aaa | +I‘¢T vI‘¢T aaa! v1‘ viv vI'+T tI bl SABI [P10}9g 
9+III ¢+III S+Iil S+III Sarid S+IIl s+III S+IIl S+III sXet [BUY 
CoA S+AIX CoAT STAIX SEINIDS< en, Si Ax Sa IND Coin Alo SABI [eSIOC 
0°2OT SOL 87s O'rZ SW, L6¢ eauG SLY Tel yySsusy_ prepurys 
C8est *yeoun 617602 817602 £66rT 7661 7O6tT 1T66t1 L1v602 
HNINV foH WNS1 WNSf SVO SVO SVO SVO SUC OEr 
*(sasayquaspg 


ut Y413Ua] PADpUDIS yuaodag “MUM UL JAD SJuamMaINSpamM) eUeU vIBdUvUAG fo Suamads adh} ay} AOf SJuamadnsvamM pUuD SJUNOD “T ATAV, 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 347 


Body shape and coloration as in figure 1. Head (fig. 2) broad, depressed. 
Eyes elevated, directed up and out. Posterior interorbital area as a deep pit, 
bordered behind by a ridge which forms anterior edge of shallow rectangular 
occipital pit. No deep pit before and below eyes. Low crest on upper posterior 
corner of orbit. Most head spines difficult to distinguish; preorbital bone with 
main spine pointing down and slightly forward, two lumps or ridges on anterior 
edge. Supplemental and 4 preopercular spines present, all short. Other spines 
absent or developed as lumps or ridges. Body covered with warts. Small teeth 
on jaws and vomer; none on palatines. 

Head and body pallid to tan, with darker brown areas, most notably dark on 
back between posterior part of spinous dorsal fin and anterior half of anal fin 
and at base of caudal fin. Pale irregular spots on a tan background on outside 
and inside of pectoral fin, fin pale in middle and dark distally. Other fins, 
except spinous dorsal, dark distally with tips of rays or margins white. Smallest 
specimens with posterior part of body and caudal and anal fin darker than in 
larger specimens. 

Described from nine specimens. Probably a small species, largest available 
102 mm. in standard length. 

CoMPARISONS. This species most resembles S. verrucosa in body and head 
shape but differs from it by having a lower pectoral ray count (14-15 versus 
18-19) and a different dorsal ray count (usually XIV + 5 versus usually XIII 
+ 6%). Synanceia nana lacks a pit below the eye, unlike S. verrucosa, S. platy- 
rhynchus, and especially S. horrida. Synanceia nana has a rectangular depres- 
sion on the occiput which is absent in S. verrucosa. Synanceia nana has a higher 
pectoral ray count than S. alula (14 or more versus 11). Other differences are 
given in the key or may be found by comparing ‘Distinguishing features’ sec- 
tions. 

REMARKS. The single specimen from outside the Red Sea (Saudi Arabia, 
AMNH 18385, 102 mm. S.L.) has higher counts of dorsal, anal, and pectoral 
rays and one more vertebra (table 1), and is darker brown in coloration than 
the Red Sea specimens. It also has the tips of the inner pelvic rays joined to 
each other by skin rather than having the tips of the inner rays attached to the 
body. It is about 30 mm. longer in standard length than our largest Red Sea 
specimen. We feel it is referable to S. nana, but study of additional specimens 
from outside the Red Sea would be desirable. 

DISTRIBUTION. Synanceia nana is known from the type material from the 
Gulf of Suez and the Gulf of Aqaba in the Red Sea and from Saudi Arabia. 
Depths of capture range from about 3 to 10 m. 

Name. The specific name ‘nana’ is a Latin noun meaning dwarf or pygmy, 
alluding to the small size of this species. 


348 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Synanceia alula Eschmeyer and Rama Rao, new species. 
(Figures 3-4; tables 2-5.) 


Synanceia verrucosa, KEEGAN et al., 1964, fig. 26 (good photograph of a specimen from the 
Solomon Islands). 


HoLotyPe. SU 14673 (a specimen 85.0 mm. in standard length), Nicobar 
Islands, Nancouri Island, 8°N., 93°40’E., shore collection, R.J.M.S. Investigator 
station 615, 27 October 1921. 

PARATYPES. ZSI 289/2 (1, 72.0), taken with the holotype; USNM 209420 
(2, 30.0-48.5), Solomon Islands, New Georgia, Munda Pier, in old coral, col- 
lected by W. Chapman, 7 May 1944; USNM 209421 (1, 27.8), Solomon Is- 
lands, New Georgia, Munda lagoon, collectors Chapman and Cheyne, 19 June 
1944. 

DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Dorsal XIII + 5'-6'%; anal normally III + 
4%2-5' (last soft ray usually double); pectoral 11; pelvic I+ 4; head broad, 
depressed, large pit below eye. 

DescripTIon. Dorsal fin with 13 spines; spines nearly same length, first 
shortest, second and third longest, covered by thick skin; venom glands promi- 
nent, on distal half of spines. Dorsal soft rays 5’2—-6'2, branched distally, last 
%2 ray virtually a distinct separate ray (without dissection soft rays probably 
would be counted as 6-7). Anal fin with 3 spines (4 in one specimen) and 5% 
(normally) or 4'2 soft rays; first anal spine about half length of second; last 
anal soft ray usually double (but appearing as two close-set rays); anal rays 
branched distally except in small specimens. Pectoral rays 11, all rays branched 
at tips in largest 2 specimens. Pelvic fin with 1 spine and 4 soft rays, but 3 soft 
rays on left side of holotype. Gill rakers rudimentary, total 7-8, O-1 on upper 
arch, 7 on lower arch. Lateral line tubes difficult to distinguish from ‘warts,’ 
about 11 lateral line scales. Vertebrae 24 (4 specimens). 

Body shape and coloration as in figure 3. Head (fig. 4) broad, depressed; 
eyes elevated, with crest at upper posterior corner. Large pit below eye, largest 
in largest specimens; deep pit below parietal and nuchal spines. Occipital pit 
shallow or nearly absent. Most head spines developed as lumps or ridges, poorly 
defined. Preorbital bone prominent, main spine as a broad lump pointing down, 
with lateral ridges pointing anteriorly. Supplemental preopercular spine absent 
or fused with first preopercular spine; four preopercular spines present. Small 
teeth on jaws and vomer, none on palatines. 

Head and body tan or brown, with darkest areas on back and between pos- 
terior portion of spinous dorsal fin and anal fin; a broad dark band at base of 
caudal fin. Dorsal fin brown in holotype (possibly discolored), paler in other 
specimens. 

Described from 5 specimens. Probably a small species, largest available 85.0 
mm. in standard length. 


349 


NEW STONEFISHES 


AMA RAO: 


A 


ESCHMEYVER & R 


VoL. XXXIX] 


‘spuv[s[ UOWOTOS 


‘ 


"TS ‘wu ¢g ‘¢/orl Qs ‘adAjofoy ‘nynjo DiaaUuDUkG 


‘¢ GUN 


350 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 4. Drawing of head in holotype of Synanceia alula, 85 mm. S.L. 


TABLE 2. Counts and measurements for type specimens of Synanceia alula (measurements 
in mm., percent standard length in parentheses). 


Paratypes 
Holotype 

SU ZSI USNM USNM USNM 

14673 289/2 209420 209420 209421 
Standard length 85.0 72.0 30.0 48.5 27.8 
Dorsal rays XII+5% #£XiIlI+6% #$;XIII+5% £XiIII+6% #«4XiIII-+5% 
Anal rays TI-+5 T1I-+5% IV+4'% IlI+5% I1I+4% 
Pectoral rays ialeila Talal 11,11 ileal iis 
Pelvic rays I+3,1+4 I+4,1I+4 I+4,I+4 I+4,1+4 I+4,1+4 
Vertebrae 24 — 24 24 24 
Head length 35.4 (42) = 11.8 (39) 19.2 (40) 11.5 (41) 
Body depth 31.8 (37) — 11.0 (37) 17.0 (35) 10.0 (36) 
Orbit diameter 4.2 (05) —- 1.6 (05) 2.4 (05) 1.7 (06) 
Snout length 8.3 (10) aa 3.0 (10) 4.8 (10) 2.8 (10) 
Interorbital width 4.6 (05) oa Zeon (Op) 4.0 (08) 1.8 (06) 
Jaw length 16.8 (20) — 5.5 (18) 9.0 (19) 4.7 (17) 
Predorsal fin length 23.4 (28) a 8.3 (28) 13.5 (28) 7.8 (28) 
Pectoral fin length* 39.5 (47) = 13.3 (44) 22.4 (46) 12.0 (43) 


Pelvic fin length 23.5 (28) —- 8.8 (30) 14.8 (30) 8.0 (29) 


* from base of lower ray to tip of fin 


351 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 


I g I a ee ee I g I —- —- —|- —- —- —- — —- — Of SNG OISOUDAN * 
i — ¢ o—_- — — SS Sse Ss SG S$ —- — —- , =— DUSUSOUDIAU * J 
ep Sy es SS a ee ST @ ¢ I — pgajqosaqsp *T 
Se a pe Se —- — Tf DUNADp °C 
= Sal yh Soe eevee, mart an! i eas oe 2 SSN Vie) area? ceo Se See Oe Oe DSO4d HE 
SS ee | oy ES Sai ie SS = = = — i => IZ — = = DSOIMALAL “S 
SSS SS SS se Ss SS i SiS i Ss i SSS SS il -- — | — snyaucysgyoig *¢ 
= — =| — — —- — Ft — Se a es ae)? ae ==. She xe Dpisdoy “Ss 
a I rg ee ee, i aM ve) cee DUuDU *S 
= = Se SS SS ee —- -- --—--—-—- — 27 ¢ | Dyno “Ss 
Tela amen Cl elle Ol="6=. B= oL= Wi= Ge Cie ie Wie Ge te wa we se t ¢ Z 
SABI [BUR [P}O], SABI }JOS 
‘apunarunUuKs Azrupfqns ay, fo sarvads ut SKoa urf youn fo saqunu fo suo1nqgiuyisip Kouanbaty “> ATAVI, 
I 7 I ¢ 9 — — — — — — — | he it SNG OISOUDAN * T, 
= = ae eee ts (I ee IT ENOL ELS 
ee ee SS — -,- -—- - - - - pgajqosajsp “7 
SS eS eS eee SS SS SSS —-— — — — —- Tt =— DUNADP °C 
—- — — — — St — —- — — —- —- — — Fit —_-_ — SS SS KH DSOAO “BT 
—- — — — — ¢ ol ¢ —- —- —- — — — 2 HE 2 _-_ —_ —S = (oyu = DSOINAAIRL “SF 
= Sees SST = a — «— —s— —— ~—«T — —  Snhyoukyshyni¢ -s 
ee a ee OC) Soe See Oe) pe ee NC) Aig ee wel abe ae) PLT ROG ne Sa OSS 
SS Ss SS ee ee SSS Se SSeS SH | fs = —- —1te-->-- pUunU *¢ 
—-—-—-———27e¢ = =| — —- -—- —- —|- 2 ££ -— SS SS SS SS Din “s 
We Sid i b= Ge WE OK" NN tbileee elem (Clee Vibe Oem Om meer lee AO IS Sy fyi YE Gag FE AEE 
sAei [BS1IOP [BJO], SABI }JOS 


‘aDULaIUDUKG KpwUD{Qns ayq {oO Sardads ut SKdA Uf yossop fo Aaqunu fo suornqiuysip Kouanbasy “¢ ATAV, 


352 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


CoMPARISONS. Synanceia alula resembles S. horrida in many respects, par- 
ticularly by having a deep pit below the eye, but S. alula differs from S. horrida 
and all other species of the genus in having a very low pectoral ray count (11 
versus 14 to 19). Other differences are given in the key or may be found by 
comparing ‘Distinguishing features’ sections. 

DISTRIBUTION. Synanceia alula is known only from the type specimens from 
the Solomon Islands in the western Pacific Ocean and from the Nicobar Islands 
in the northern Indian Ocean. The specimen figured by Keegan eé al. (1964) 
also was from the Solomon Islands. 

Name. The specific name ‘alula’ (al’-t-la), meaning little wing, is a Latin 
feminine noun, the diminutive of a/a (wing), alluding to the very low pectoral 
ray count in this species. 


Synanceia horrida (Linnaeus). 
(Figures 5-6; tables 3-5.) 


(A partial synonymy pertinent to the scope of the study.) 

Scorpaena horrida LINNAEUS, 1766, p. 453 (original description; type locality East Indies). 

Scorpaena “alepidota”’ Biocu, 1787, pp. 106-108, pl. 183 ([see ‘Remarks’ below]). 

Synanceia horrida, BLocH and SCHNEIDER, 1801, pp. xxxvii, 194, 573 (misspelled genus as 
Synanceja on p. 194, corrected on p. 573; brief description and synonymy) ; CUVIER in 
Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829, pp. 440-446 (lengthy description; review of earlier 
literature) ; BLEEKER, 1849, pp. 4, 9 (synonymy; brief description; range); 1852a, pp. 
230, 237, 242 (compiled range) ; 1874, pp. 4, 11-13, fig. 1 on pl. 1 (synonymy; descrip- 
tion; distribution) ; 1879, fig. 7 on pl. CCCCXVII (figure from Bleeker, 1874) ; Herre, 
1951, pp. 479-480 (synonymy; description; Philippines) ; p—E BEAUFORT in Weber and 
de Beaufort, 1962, pp. 95-97 (synonymy; description; distribution). 

Synanceia grossa GRAY, 1830, pl. 97 (plate only, plus caption; type locality Singapore). 

Synanceia trachynis RICHARDSON, 1842, pp. 385-389 (original description; type locality Port 
Essington, Northern Territory, Australia). 

Synancidium horridum, GUNTHER, 1860, pp. 144-146 (brief synonymy; description of skele- 
ton; BMNH specimens); KNER, 1865, p. 119 (description; Java); Day, 1875, p. 162, 
fig. 3 on pl. XXXIX (synonymy; description) ; FOWLER, 1928, pp. 297-298 (compiled). 

Scorpaena monstrosa GRAY, 1854, p. 117 (after Gronovius and ‘horrida’ of Linnaeus). 

Synanceja horrida, McCuLtocH, 1929, p. 392 (synonymy; Australia) ; WHITLEY, 1930, pp. 
24-25 (synonymy; comparisons with S. trachynis). 

Synanceja trachynis, WHITLEY, 1930, pp. 25-26 (synonymy; Australian records; venom) ; 
1932a, pp. 306-309, figs. 1-2 on pl. 4 (description; fresh coloration; Australia) ; 1960, 
pp. 1-6, 4 figs. (semi-popular account; habitat, coloration, venom); Muwnro, 1967, p. 
540 (description; New Guinea). 


Remarks. References on venom and related subjects, as well as specimen 
figures, are given by Halstead (1970). Some Australian workers continue to 
recognize S. trachynis as a species distinct from S. horrida; we have not made 
an exhaustive study but our specimens seem to indicate that the two names 
are synonyms. 

Scorpaena alepidota of Bloch (1787) originated through an inadvertent 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 353 


error. As evidenced by style in Bloch’s work, a heading “‘Scorpaena horrida” be- 
fore the words Scorpaena alepidota was omitted, giving the incorrect impression 
that ‘alepidota’ was proposed as the scientific name. The plate was correctly 
labeled ‘horrida.’ The name ‘alepidota’ has no separate status nomenclaturally. 
MATERIAL EXAMINED. (No counts were made on specimens which have 
standard length omitted.) 
SINGAPORE 


SU 30873 (5 specimens, 67.8-134 mm. S.L.), Herre 1934 Pacific Expedition, 
A. W. Herre, 15 March 1934. SU 36001 (1, 151), Singapore market, A. W. 
Herre, February 1937. SU 32128 (1, 159), 8 February 1899. 


THAILAND 


USNM 209422 (2, 147-190), Paton Bay, Patong Phuket, International Indian 
Ocean Expedition, Anton Bruun Cruise No. 1, 22 April 1963. CAS 15073 (1, 
102), Rayong Province, SE. of Ban Phe Fisheries Station, 12°35’40’N., 101° 
25’43’E., Fehlmann and assistants, 28 April 1960. Plus ANSP 89676 (1). 


PHILIPPINES 


CAS 15074 (1, 136), Calaogao, Cauayan, Negros Island, collected among coral 
stones at night, 10°N., 122°30’E., Q. Akala, 18 May 1960. SU 34132 (1, 196), 
Sitankai, Sulu Island, Oriental Expedition 1936-37, A. W. Herre, 9 January 
1937. SU 29780 (1, 158), Manila Bay, A. W. Herre, December 1933. SU 28363 
(1, 95.0), Atimonan, Tayabas, Herre 1931 Philippine Expedition, A. W. Herre, 
1931. SU 39137 (1, 111), Ragay Gulf, Luzon, A. W. Herre, 1940. Plus SU 
28365 (2). 
BATAVIA 
ANSP 90442 (1), Baai. 
NEw GUINEA 


SU 26744 (1, 160), Waigiu Island (= Waigeo Island), A. W. Herre, 7 June 
1929. 
AUSTRALIA 


USNM 174014 (5, 57.5-73.7), Northern Territory, reefs and tide pools off 
south entrance to lagoon, Groote Eylandt, Arnhemland Expedition, R. R. Miller 
and party, 19-25 March 1948. 


DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Dorsal XIII-XIV (usually XIII) + 6%; anal 
II-III (usually III) +51; pectoral 15-17, usually 16; pelvic I + 4—5, usually 
5; all fin rays usually branched; head large, depressed, with deep pits; eyes 
elevated, with bony crest above posterior corner of orbit, joined between orbits; 
occiput depressed, forming a deep saddle behind orbits; a deep, mostly round 
pit below eye; deep pit below parietal and nuchal spines. Body covered with 
thick skin and warts. 


354 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 5. Synanceia horrida, USNM 174014, sub-adult, 67 mm. S.L., Australia. 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 305 


Ficure 6. Synanceia horrida, CAS 15074, head of an adult, 142 mm. S.L., Philippines. 


DEscrRIPTION. Dorsal fin with 13 spines, occasionally 14; spines nearly 
same length, second to fourth longest, covered by thick skin. Dorsal soft rays 
6%, branched distally. Anal fin with 3 spines (2 spines in 2 of 19 specimens) 
and 5% soft rays, spines progressing in length from first to third, soft rays 
branched distally. Pectoral fin rays 15-17, usually 16, all rays branched at tips. 
Pelvic fin with 1 spine and 4 or 5, usually 5, soft rays [one specimen (SU 
28363) abnormally with I + 3 on right and I+ 5 on left]. Gill rakers rudimen- 
tary, total 13-15 in larger specimens, difficult to distinguish on upper arch in 


our specimens below 75 mm. S.L., larger specimens with 5—6 on upper arch, all 


356 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Taste 5. Frequency distributions of pectoral rays and pelvic soft rays in species of the 
subfamily Synanceiinae. 


Pelvic soft rays 


Pectoral rays (left side) (left side) 
11 WW 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 3 4 5 
S. alula 5 — —- — 1 5a 
S. nana = =—_ = 8 if Bee? Ye 9 
S. horrida — = = = 3 14 2 = = >. 3 17 
S. platyrhynchus a 1 a= 2a nae 1 
S. verrucosa’ ee 19 3 =. 1** 21 
E. erosa ~- _- — 1 14 1 16 an 
D. daruma — 1 — — _ = a 
L. asteroblepa — —- 3y 1 —_ 
P. melanostigma — = — 3 5 — = ass Le ” - a 
T. uranoscopus —- —- — 6 a ee 16) 
* 16 on right 
** 5 on right 


y+ one with 13 on right 
lleft and right pectoral ray counts for 24 additional specimens: 17+18 (1 specimen), 18418 (22), 
19419 (1). 


sizes with 8—9 on lower arch. Lateral line pores usually 10-12, difficult to dis- 
tinguish from warts. Vertebrae 24. 

Body shape and coloration as in figure 5. Head (fig. 6) broad, depressed; 
eyes elevated slightly, accentuated by large, mostly circular deep pit below 
eyes and large crests above eyes. Occipital area deep, forming saddle between 
eyes and beginning of dorsal fin; this area smooth, without warts. Deep pit 
also present behind eye below parietal and nuchal spines. Preorbital bone prom- 
inent, with broad spinous point directed downwards, with lateral ridges pointing 
anteriorly. Suborbital ridge with one large lump in middle. Supplemental pre- 
opercular spine usually present as a lump, first three preopercular spines usu- 
ally present, first and second the largest. Other head spines indistinct or de- 
veloped as lumps or absent. Small teeth on jaws and vomer, none on palatines. 

Coloration of a small specimen as in figure 5. In preservative mostly brown; 
fins tend to be darker distally, except for spinous dorsal fin; caudal darkest at 
base, in middle, and distally; remaining areas of caudal fin streaked with white. 

CoMPARISONS. Synanceia horrida is most like S. alula in having a large pit 
below the eyes, but S. Aorrida is easily separated from S. alula by having more 
pectoral rays (15-17 versus 11), among other features. From the widespread 
S. verrucosa, S. horrida can be distinguished by having a large circular pit below 
the eye and high crests above the eyes which are joined, leaving no pit between 
the eyes. Other differences are given in the key and other ‘Comparisons’ 
sections. 

DiIsTRIBUTION. Synanceia horrida has a fairly wide range, occurring from 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 357 


India eastwards to Java, New Guinea, Australia, the Philippines, and China. 
Unlike S. verrucosa it is apparently absent from the central Pacific and from 
western India to the Red Sea and Africa. It appears to be a continental and 
‘large island’ species living on sandy or muddy bottom among rocks. (A record 
of this species from Saint Helena in the Atlantic (Giinther, 1860, p. 145) was 
presumed (Eschmeyer, 1971, p. 503) to be based on incorrect locality informa- 
tion accompanying the specimen.) 


Synanceia platyrhynchus Bleeker. 

(Figure 7; tables 3-5.) 

Synanceia platyrhynchus BLEEKER, 1874, pp. 4, 11, 14-15, fig. 2 on pl. 1 (original description ; 
type locality Amboina); 1879, fig. 2 on pl. CCCXVI (figure of type from Bleeker, 
1874) ; DE BrEAurort im Weber and de Beaufort, 1962, p. 99 (examined type and one 
additional specimen with no locality data; thought to be a hybrid between S. verrucosa 
and S. horrida). 

Synanceja (Nofua) platyrhynchus, WHITLEY, 1930, p. 24 (as type of a new subgenus). 


MATERIAL EXAMINED. RMNH 5898 (1, 129 mm. S.L., 164 or 165 mm. 
T.L., holotype of S. platyrhynchus), Amboina. We could not locate the second 
specimen mentioned by de Beaufort 7m Weber and de Beaufort (1962, p. 99). 

REMARKS. De Beaufort gave the length of the two specimens he examined 
as 153 and 220 mm. and stated that one of them was the type. One of these 
measurements must be in error as the type in Leiden is 165 mm. T.L., the same 
length Bleeker gave in the original description. 

The type specimen appears to us to be referable to S. horrida, but it seems 
to be abnormal in that the crests above the eyes are more poorly developed and 
are not joined between the eyes. This leaves a depression between the eyes 
which approaches somewhat the condition in S. verrucosa, although in S. ver- 
rucosa the pit is broader and the eyes farther apart. The type of S. platy- 
rhynchus is very similar to S. alula with regard to head shape and location of 
crests and pits, but S. alula has far fewer pectoral rays (11 versus 17). We 
have kept S. platyrhynchus as a separate entry in this paper to draw attention 
to it in hopes that additional specimens may be found if it is in fact a species 
distinct from S. horrida. 

Counting by the methods used in this paper, the type specimen has dorsal 
rays XIII + 6%, anal rays III + 5%, and pelvic rays I+ 5. De Beaufort (in 
Weber and de Beaufort, 1962, p. 99) discusses the type specimen in more detail. 
A photograph of the type as it appears now is reproduced as figure 7. 


Synanceia verrucosa Bloch and Schneider. 
(Figure 8; tables 3-5.) 


(A partial synonymy pertinent to the scope of the study.) 


Synanceia verrucosa BLocH and SCHNEIDER, 1801, pp. XX XVII, 195, pl. 45 (original descrip- 
tion; type locality India; spelling of genus on p. 194 corrected to Synanceia in Cor- 


358 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


os 
F Fe 


’ 
, 


, Gay ooh os % 

‘ nie? et 

; Zz % ae 4 a 2 aes 
2 2 ; ; ® % : 


#., 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 7. Synanceia platyrhynchus, RMNH 5898, holotype, 129 mm. S.L., Amboina. 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 359 


rigenda, p. 573); GUNTHER, 1860, p. 146 (synonymy; brief description; BMNH speci- 
mens); BLEEKER, 1874, pp. 4, 11, 15-17 (synonymy; description; range); Day, 1875, 
pp. 162-163, fig. 4 on pl. XXXIX (synonymy; description; range); BLEEKER, 1879, 
fig. 5 on pl. CCCCXVII (figure only) ; Herre, 1951, pp. 479-482 (synonymy; descrip- 
tion; Philippines) ; DE BEAUFORT 7m Weber and de Beaufort, 1962, pp. 95, 97-99 (synon- 
ymy; description; distribution). 

Scorpaena bicirrata LACEPEDE, 1801, pp. 333, 349-350 (original description, from Commerson). 

Scorpaena brachion LAcEPEDE, 1801, pp. 333, 351-352, pl. 12 opposite p. 360 (original de- 
scription, based on drawing from Commerson; no type locality). 

Scorpaena Bicapillata SHAw, 1803, p. 273, pl. 40 (for Lacépéde’s Scorpaena bicirrata; de- 
scription from Lacépede). 

Scorpaena Brachiata SHAW, 1803, p. 274 (for Lacépéde’s Scorpaena brachion). 

Synanceia brachio Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829, pp. 447-454 (new spelling for 
S. brachion Wacépede; synonymy; long description; review of earlier literature) ; 
BLEEKER, 1849, pp. 4, 9-10 (synonymy; description; range); 1852a, pp. 233, 236, 240 
(listed; Ternate, Banda, Ceram, and Waigioe). 

Synanceia bicapillata, Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829, pp. 454-456 (synonymy ; 
description; discussion) ; BLEEKER, 1849, p. 4 (compiled range); 1852a, pp. 230, 242 
(listed; Molucca). 

Synanceia sanguinolenta Cuvier in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829, p. 447, footnote (original 
description from Ehrenberg MS and figure; no locality). 

Synanceja verrucosa, FOWLER, 1928, p. 299 (synonymy; remarks; range) ; MCCULLocH, 1929, 
392-393 (synonymy; range). 

Synanceichthys verrucosus, BLEEKER, 1863, p. 234 (listed; Ternate); WHITLEY, 1932a, pp. 
309-310 (rare on Great Barrier Reef; AMS specimens from other localities) ; Munro, 
1967, p. 540 (description; New Guinea). 

Emmydrichthys vulcanus JorpAN and Rutter in Jordan, 1896, pp. 221-223, 562, pl. 26 
(original description; type of new genus; type locality Society Islands). 

Synanceia thersites SEALE, 1901, pp. 121-122 (original description; type locality Marianas 
Islands [holotype BPBM 256, not found; paratype ANSP 91726]). 

Deleastes daector SEALE, 1906, pp. 80-81, fig. 22 (original description; type locality Tahiti; 
holotype BPBM 1360 [not found]). 


Remarks. All the nominal species listed above have been recognized as 
synonyms of S. verrucosa by previous workers. Emmydrichthys vulcanus was 
based on a specimen with an abnormal dorsal fin. In the original description of 
Deleastes daector, Seale reported it differed from Synanceia by having shorter 
pelvic fins, pelvic fins located more posteriorly, and a smoother skin. The loca- 
tion and apparent size of the pelvic fins depend in part on the position of the 
hyoid arch on preservation, and we find that either of two conditions is com- 
mon: the depth between the rear of the head and the pelvic fin will be shallow 
when the hyoid arch is not depressed or will be deep when the arch is depressed 
downward. The presence of warts was found to be somewhat variable. A more 
thorough study should be made. 

MATERIAL EXAMINED. (No counts were made, except of pectoral rays, on 
specimens which have standard length omitted.) 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


360 


(apis Yay wo APYSYs poy! woevateds) 


‘eyeasny “TS “Wu 671 Qinpe ‘OOLET SVD ‘psoIndsan pioupuKg ‘SS ANOS 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 361 


WESTERN INDIAN OCEAN 


CAS 14943 (1 specimen, 123 mm. S.L.), Kenya, Andromache Reef just south 
of entrance to Port Kilindini of Mombasa Harbor, 4°05’05”S., 39°40’39”E., 
over flat reef with dead coral and sand, International Indian Ocean Expedition, 
Anton Bruun Cruise No. 9, sta. HA-1, 15 November 1964; SU 37205 (1, 154), 
southern Andaman Islands, south of Corbyn’s Cove, Port Blair, under a coral 
stone in low water, D. D. Mukerji, 16 December 1933; Plus ANSP 107718 (1) 
and ANSP 107702 (1), Sechelles; USNM 19981 (1), Mauritius. 


CEYLON 


CAS 14969 (3), Trincomalee, outside harbor at coral cave, inside base of Royal 
Navy of Ceylon, depth to 1.5 meters, W. Smith-Vaniz, 27 June 1969. 


OKINAWA 
MSN <71553° (1). 


PHILIPPINES 
SU 28362 (2, 121-187), Sitankai, Sulu Province, Herre Philippine Expedition, 
A. W. Herre, 12 August 1931. SU 28364 (1, 51.3), Dumaguete, Herre Philip- 
pine Expedition, A. W. Herre, 11 June 1931. Plus SU 34135 (1). 


MICRONESIA 

Palau Islands: CAS 14957 (1, 97.5), Auluptagel Island, Crocodile Cove, 7°17’ 
N., 134°29’E., Brittan et al., 29 July 1956. CAS 14959 (1, 106), Angaur Island 
in Garangaoi Cove, south of Cape Nagaramudel, 6°53’50”’N., 134°7'49”E., 
DeWitt and party, 22 October 1957. CAS 14956 (2, 119-133), Ngadarak Reef 
SW. of Auluptagel Island, 7°17’48’N., 134°28’37”E., Rikrik, 8 July 1956. 
Plus CAS 14953 (1), CAS 14954 (1), CAS 14958 (1), CAS 14960 (1), and 
CAS 14961 (1). Mariana Islands: CAS 14963 (1, 39.1), Guam, ca. % mile 
SW. of Agat village, sand flat off north side of Bangi point, 13°22’36’N., 
144°38’53”E., Fehlmann, 12 October 1958. CAS 14965 (3, 54.2-121), Guam 
reef and sand flat north of Tringhera Beach in Agana Bay, 13°28’53”N., 144° 
45’45’”E., Fehlmann and Bronson, 7 April 1959. ANSP 91726 (1, 160, para- 
type of S. thersites), Guam, Agana, A. Seale, 12 July 1900. Plus CAS 14966 
(2), CAS 14962 (1), and CAS 14964 (1). Caroline Islands: CAS 14947 (1, 
126), Yap Island, inlet on east side of Yap Island, 9°29’48”N., 138°26'57”E., 
Bronson and Hermana, 27 December 1959. Plus CAS 14952 (3) and CAS 
14948 (1). 


MELANESIA 
Solomon Islands: CAS 15076 (1, 47.8), Bougainville, east side of Puk Puk 
Island, sea beach outside of Poison Lagoon, Te Vega Expedition, Cruise No. 6, 


362 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Sta. 243, William P. Davis, 9 March 1965. SU 6034 (1, 154), Sikiana Island, 
Stewart group, Crocker Expedition, 16 May 1933. 


POLYNESIA 

Samoa: CAS 2228 (1, 115), A. Seale, 25 June 1929. CAS 2225 (2, 94.3-168), 
Pago Pago, A. Seale, May 1929. Plus SU 9041 (3) and CAS 14967 (1). Fiji: 
SU 21021 (1). Tonga Islands: CAS 14968 (1). Society Islands: SU 5357 (1, 
187, holotype of Emmydrichthys vulcanus). CAS 14949 (1, 135), Tahiti, 
Tavavo, J. E. Randall, 21 April 1956. CAS 14955 (1, 47.4), Moorea, Faatoai 
village at entrance to Papetoai Bay, J. E. Randall and party, 30 June 1956. 
Plus CAS 14950 (3) and CAS 14983 (1). Tuamotu Islands: CAS 14946 (2) 
and CAS 14945 (1). 


NEw CALEDONIA 
USNM 208132 (1), Noumea. 


NEw GUINEA 
USNM 30516 (1). 


AUSTRALIA 


CAS 13760 (1, 129), Capricorn Islands, One Tree Island, west side, reef flat, 
caught under stone on reef crest, F. McMichael, 20 November 1969. Plus CAS 
14944 (1), Fairfax Island. 


RED SEA 
HUJ uncataloged (101 mm. S.L.). 


DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Dorsal XIJ-XIV, usually XIII + 5'%-7%, 
usually 612; anal III + 5’2-6%, usually 5%; pectoral 17-19, usually 18; pelvic 
I+ 5; all soft rays usually branched, covered with thick skin; head depressed; 
eyes only slightly elevated, far apart, and with a deep depression between; 
occipital area elevated, bordered laterally by a pit lying behind each eye; small 
pit below and before eyes, pit smaller than orbit. Body covered with thick 
skin and warts. 

DescriPTIon. Dorsal fin normally with 13 spines; spines nearly same 
length, about third through fifth the longest, covered by thick skin. Dorsal 
soft rays 52-77%, usually 62, branched distally. Anal fin with 3 spines and 
5% (rarely 6'’2) soft rays, soft rays branched distally, spines progressing in 
length from first to third. Pectoral fin rays 18-19, usually 18; all rays 
branched distally but dissection may be necessary to discern in lower fleshy 
pectoral rays, rays unbranched in very small specimens. Pelvic fin with 1 
spine and 5, or rarely 4, soft rays. Gill rakers rudimentary, total 8-11, 1-4 on 


VoLt. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 363 


upper arch, 6-8 on lower arch. Lateral line difficult to distinguish from warts, 
usually 8-10 pores present. Vertebrae 24. 

Body shape and coloration as in figure 8. Head large, broad, and depressed; 
eyes very slightly elevated, far apart, and with a deep pit between them; occipital 
area elevated, without a pit; a pit present behind each eye lateral to occiput, 
deepest below parietal and nuchal spinous ridge; a small, more or less U- 
shaped pit, less than orbit diameter, below and in front of eyes. Preorbital 
bone covered by thick skin, usually with two diverging spines over maxillary. 
Suborbital ridge with one large lump in middle under eye. Supplemental pre- 
opercular spine usually absent, first and second preopercular spines large, third 
sometimes present, fourth and fifth absent. Other head spines indistinct, or 
developed as lumps or ridges, or absent. Small teeth on jaws, none on vomer 
or palatine. 

Coloration variable. In preservative mostly brown (fig. 8). Pectoral, pelvic, 
and caudal fins tipped with white. Caudal fin with a subterminal dark band. 
Paler areas on body, usually well marked between soft dorsal and anal fin. 

COMPARISONS. Synanceia verrucosa is most like S. nana in shape and loca- 
tion of pits on the head, but S. verrucosa is easily separated from S. nana by 
having more pectoral rays (18-19 versus 14). Synanceia verrucosa lacks vomer- 
ine teeth, while the other species of the genus have small teeth on the vomer. 
Synanceia verrucosa may be separated from the other species of the genus by 
the characters presented in the key. 

DISTRIBUTION. Synanceia verrucosa is the most widespread stonefish and is 
known from throughout the Indo-West Pacific faunal region from the Red Sea, 
eastern Africa east to Tahiti, and from Australia north to Japan. It is found 
in shallow water among coral reefs and coral rubble. 


Genus Erosa Swainson 
Erosa SWAINSON, 1839, p. 61 (type-species Synanceia erosa Langsdorf, understood from 
text). 


Bufichthys Swatnson, 1839, p. 181 (type-species S. erosa, by monotypy [see ‘Nomenclatural 
remarks’]). 


Synanchia, SwAINSON, 1839, p. 268, not pp. 61 or 280-281 (misidentification or misprint 
[see ‘Nomenclatural remarks’]). 


Synanchia, BLEEKER, 1874, pp. 3-4 (as a genus for ‘erosa’; after Swainson, 1839, p. 268 [see 
‘Nomenclatural remarks’]). 


Erosa, JorDAN and Starks, 1904, p. 156 (described as a “new genus” after Swainson; 
wrongly thought Swainson’s name had no nomenclatural standing). 


NOMENCLATURAL REMARKS. See ‘Nomenclatural remarks’ under the genus 
Synanceia. 
GENERIC DIAGNOSIS. See ‘Distinguishing features’ under the species account. 


364 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Erosa erosa (Langsdorf). 
(Figure 9; tables 3-5.) 


Synanceia erosa LANGSDORF in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829, pp. 459-460 (original descrip- 
tion; type locality Japan); Cuvier, 1837, p. vii, fig. 3 on Ichthyology pl. 21 (color 
plate); TEMMINCK and SCHLEGEL, 1843, p. 45, fig. 1 on pl. xvii (brief description; 
Japan); BorsreMan, 1947, pp. 54-55 (Burger and Von Siebold specimens from Japan; 
equals Erosa erosa). 

Synanchia erosa, SWAINSON, 1839, p. 268 (name only; Synanchia in error for Bufichthys 
[see ‘Nomenclatural remarks’ under genus Synanceia]). 

Synancidium erosum, GUNTHER, 1860, p. 146 (brief description; BMNH specimens) ; STEIN- 
DACHNER and DODERLEIN, 1884, p. 199 (short description; Tokyo and Kagoshima) ; 
Nystrom, 1887, p. 19 (description; one specimen from Japan); ISHIKAWA and Mat- 
SUURA, 1897, p. 49 (listed; Kagoshima, Japan). 

Erosa erosa, JORDAN and Starks, 1904, pp. 156-158, fig. 16 (synonymy; description; varia- 
tion in coloration; Japan); FRANz, 1910, p. 74 (specimens from Japan); JORDAN and 
TuHompson, 1914, p. 276, fig. 46 (listed; Japan; figure from Jordan and Starks, 1904) ; 
McCuttocu, 1921, pp. 177-178 (E. iridea a synonym; description; figure of holotype 
of E. ividea); JoRDAN and Hupss, 1925, p. 275 (specimens from Japan) ; McCULLOcH, 
1929, p. 392 (listed; HE. wvidea a synonym); ScHMuipT, 1931, p. 111 (specimen from 
Japan) ; FowLer, 1938b, p. 199 (listed from Malaya); MAtTsuBarA, 1943, pp. 422-424 
(synonymy; description; internal features; specimens from Japan). 

Erosa fratrum Octtey, 1910a, p. 32 (original description; type locality Moreton Bay, coast 
of southern Queensland, Australia); McCuLtocu, 1929, p. 392 (listed; Australia) ; 
WHITLEY, 1964, p. 57 (listed; Australia). 

Erosa iridea OcttBy, 1910b, p. 113 (original description; type locality 19 miles N., 30°W., 
from Double Island Point, in 33 fathoms, coast of southern Queensland, Australia). 


MATERIAL EXAMINED. (Counts were not taken on specimens with standard 
length omitted and locality information abbreviated.) 


JAPAN 
SU 7385 (1, 98.3), Misaki, Jordan and Snyder. SU 7389 (1, 85.5), Nagasaki, 
Hizen, Jordan and Snyder. SU 7197 (3, 77.7-109), Odowara. FSUT 7550 (1, 
94.7), Wakayama. FSUT 32013 (1, 111), Nagasaki. FSUT 32263 (1, 48.4), 
Nagasaki. FSUT 34630 (1, 131), Kochi. FSUT 34633 (1, 69.0), Kochi. Plus 
USNM 51342 (1), USNM 59714 (1), USNM 75919 (2), and USNM 57650 
(ye 


SOUTH CHINA SEA 
CAS 14800 (1, 91.0), 20°04’N., 111°58’E., R. L. Bolin, 20 July 1958. CAS 
14797 (1, 85.2), 20°02’30’N., 113°32’E., F. D. Ommanney, 25 June 1958. 
CAS 14799 (1, 111), Formosa Strait, just south of Formosa Banks to Pesca- 
dores Island, about 30-50 meters, trawl, F. B. Steiner, 5 May 1972. 


PHILIPPINES 
USNM 168213 (1), southern Luzon. 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 365 


AMBOINA 


ZMK uncatalogued (1, 30.3), Bugten, in about 50 fathoms, T. Mortensen, 21 
February 1922. 


AUSTRALIA 


QMB 13/1571 (about 97.0, ?holotype of Erosa fratrum), Moreton Bay, 
Queensland. AMS E2943 (1, 63.0, ?holotype of Erosa iridea), 19 miles N., 30° 
W. from Double Island Point, in 33 fathoms, Queensland. 

DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Dorsal XIV + 5%4-6%, usually 6%; anal III 
+ 5%-6%, usually 5%; pectoral 14-16, usually 15; pelvic I+ 4; all fin rays 
usually branched; no palatine teeth; head very large, globular; mouth terminal, 
only slightly oblique; eyes large and on lateral surface of head; a strong bony 
ridge connects orbits, followed on occiput with a deep pit; warts behind head, 
not well marked on body posteriorly. 

DEscRIPTION. Dorsal fin with 14 spines, all about same length. Dorsal soft 
rays 5% or 6%, usually 6’2 (without close examination would probably count 7 
rather than 6% soft rays). Anal fin with 3 spines, first short, second twice first, 
third longest. Anal soft rays 5’2—6', usually 5’2 (appearing as 6). Pectoral fin 
short, 14-16 (usually 15) branched rays. Pelvic fin with 1 spine and 4 soft 
rays. Gill rakers rudimentary, total 10-13, 3-4 on upper arch and 7-9 on lower 
arch. Lateral line tubes 10-11, including one on caudal fin. Some warts on 
body, most conspicuous behind head. Vertebrae usually 25 (24-26). 

Body shape and coloration as in figure 9. Head round; mouth terminal, 
slightly oblique; eyes not elevated, on side of head, pointing outwards. A strong 
ridge connects the orbits posteriorly; ridge followed by deep square to rectangu- 
lar occipital pit; pit also present before ridge connecting orbits but occupied by 
ascending arms of premaxillaries. No pit below eyes or below parietal and nuchal 
spines. Preorbital bone with 2 broad spines over maxillary. Suborbital ridge 
without distinct spines, raised in middle. Five blunt preopercular spines present, 
plus 2 lumps on dentary and 3 spines near bases of upper preopercular spines. 
Large cleithral spine, two blunt opercular spines. Other spines indistinct, de- 
veloped as lumps. Small teeth on jaws and vomer, none on palatines. 

In preservative (fig. 9) body brown or black on a pallid background; area 
behind head and below soft dorsal fin darkest. Pectoral fin streaked and mot- 
tled with brown or black, most lines enclosing circles, a white patch at midheight 
of upper pectoral rays; anal fin mostly pallid with streaks and circular rings of 
dusky pigment; caudal fin pallid, crossed by about 6 vertical narrow dark bands 
(or double bands). Body most noticeably pallid at bases of middle dorsal spines 
and below middle of spinous dorsal fin. 

CoMPARISONS. The genus Evosa is most like Dampierosa in body shape and 
shares with it (but not with Synanceia) the following features: eyes lateral, 
mouth only slightly oblique, head globular and not depressed. Fvosa differs 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


366 


‘yreayyg esounlog “T'S “WW TTT ‘WNpe “66Lb1 SYO ‘DSo4a DSorq *6 ANNOY 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 367 


from Dampierosa in having a lower soft dorsal fin ray count (5%2-6% versus 
9%), 14 rather than 12 dorsal spines, and 3 rather than 2 anal spines. 

DISTRIBUTION. rosa erosa occurs from Japan south to Australia; specific 
localities represented by our material and records in the literature are Japan, 
the South China Sea area, the Philippine Islands, Amboina, and eastern 
Australia. 


Genus Dampierosa Whitley 


Dampierosa WHITLEY, 1932b, p. 346 (type-species Dampierosa daruma by original designa- 
tion; monotypic). 


GENERIC DIAGNOSIS. See ‘Distinguishing features’ under the species account 
below. 


Dampierosa daruma Whitley. 

(Figure 10; tables 3-5.) 

Dampierosa daruma WHITLEY, 1932b, pp. 346-347, figs. 2-3 on pl. XXXVIII (original de- 
scription; type locality northwestern Australia, dredged off Broome, 1931, collector R. 
Bourne; holotype AMS IA5116); 1964, p. 57 (listed). 

Erosa daruma, MEEs, 1960, p. 19 (one specimen from Roeburne, Western Australia; dorsal 
XIII + 8; anal I+ 7 (or III +5); pectoral 12; placed in genus Erosa). 


MATERIAL EXAMINED. AMS JA5116 (97.2 mm. S.L., about 119 mm. T.L., 
holotype), locality as given above. Plus one specimen briefly examined, 
C.S.I.R.O. Marine Laboratory, Munroe Collection C2766 (53.0 mm. S.L.), from 
Exmouth Gulf. 

DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Dorsal XII + 9% (?XIII + 8%); anal II + 
6’2; pectoral 12; pelvic I+ 4; no palatine teeth; head large, globular; mouth 
terminal, slightly oblique; strong bony ridge connects orbits, followed on occi- 
put by a deep pit; body with warts. 

DESCRIPTION. (Based only on the holotype. A more complete description 
is given by Whitley.) Dorsal fin with 12 spines and 9'% soft rays (first soft 
ray segmented slightly, counted by Whitley (1932b) as a spine). Anal fin with 
2 spines and 6% soft rays. Dorsal and anal spines fairly weak. Pectoral fin 
short, with 12 rays. Pelvic fin with 1 spine and 4 soft rays. Gill rakers as given 
by Whitley: 7 or 8 short, rounded, thick gill rakers on first arch. Lateral line 
tubes 13. Body covered with warts. Vertebral count not available. 

Body shape and coloration as in figure 10. Head globular; mouth terminal, 
slightly oblique; eyes not elevated, on side of head, directed outwards. A strong 
ridge connects the orbits; ridge followed by deep occipital pit. No pit below 
eyes or below parietal and nuchal spines. Preorbital bone with 2 large lumps 
over maxillary. Suborbital ridge without spines. Preopercle spines prominent. 
(No information available on other spines.) Small teeth on jaws and vomer, 
none on palatines. 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


368 


“Q7e6T ‘AoPIGM Wory ons feypeajsny “TS “wu 16 ‘OLTTSVI SINYV ‘edAjofoy ‘nmap vsosndumpgq “OT axnorg 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEVER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 369 


Coloration as given by Whitley (1932b, p. 347) is as follows: 


“General colour in alcohol dark purplish-brown, irregular in tone and broken up 
by the lighter papillae and raised cephalic surfaces. Interorbital and pterotic regions 
white. Light brown mottling on lower surface of head and on parts of the body 
below the spinous and soft dorsal fins. Dorsal dark brown anteriorly, but mottled 
yellowish on the middle and posterior spines. Soft dorsal dark brownish with a 
narrow margin of yellow and a broad oblique median band of yellow. Anal similar 
to soft dorsal. Pectoral dark brownish with a yellowish band partly encircling its 
base, a broader band crossing the rays to form large ocelli below and a distal mar- 
gin of yellowish. Ventrals dark brown with two bands of yellowish and a similarly 
coloured spot on the proximal part of the last ray. Caudal dark brown, crossed by 
a broad median band of yellowish and with a broad margin of the same colour.” 


CoMPARISONS. See ‘Remarks’ below. 

DISTRIBUTION. Dampierosa daruma apparently is known only from three 
localities off northwestern Australia. 

Remarks. The holotype was briefly examined by the first author. We 
believe that additional study will show that Dampierosa should be regarded as 
a synonym of Frosa, even though the species differ substantially in counts of 
dorsal and anal fin rays. The head shape is nearly identical, sharing the pres- 
ence of a strong ridge joining the orbits, with a small pit before, and a large 
occipital pit after this ridge. The eyes and mouth are similarly located in the 
single species in each genus. In most scorpaenid fishes fin ray counts are fairly 
stable for a given genus, but in the stonefishes the counts are variable in appar- 
ently closely related species, and, as discussed under the subfamily section, 
there appears to be a trend towards an increase of dorsal spines at the expense 
of the dorsal soft rays in species of this subfamily. The presence of 2 anal 
spines in Dampierosa and 3 (the usual condition in scorpaenids) in Erosa is not 
regarded as a major difference; in Dampierosa the third anal spine has become 
a segmented ray. Mees (1960, p. 19) gives anal rays as 1+ 7 or III +5 for 1 
specimen of Dampierosa. A clarification of the dorsal and anal fin ray counts 
in available specimens of Dampierosa is needed, and internal features of Evosa 
and Dampierosa should be compared. 


Genus Pseudosynanceia Day 
Pseudosynanceia DAy, 1875, p. 163 (type-species Pseudosynanceia melanostigma Day, by 


monotypy). 


GENERIC DIAGNOsIS. See ‘Distinguishing features’ under the species account 
below. 


Pseudosynanceia melanostigma Day. 
(Figure 11; tables 3-5.) 


Pseudosynanceia melanostigma Day, 1875, p. 163, fig. 6 on pl. LV (original description; 
excellent figure of holotype; type locality Karachi, Pakistan; holotype ZSI 1761). 


370 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Leptosynanceia melanostigma, DAY, 1888, p. 788 (placed in genus Leptosynanceia) ; BLEGVAD 
and L@pPENTHIN, 1944, p. 193 (brief description; coloration; specimens from Iranian 
Gulf) ; Kuarar, 1961, p. 125 (description; counts as follows: dorsal XV—XVI + 5-6, 
anal III + 7, pectoral 14-15, ventral I-++ 2; wrongly states no lateral line; from Fao, 
Iraq). 


MATERIAL EXAMINED. 


PERSIAN GULF 


USNM 196472 (1, 51.6), ESE. of Abu Ali, C. E. Dawson, sta. 13, 13 October 
1956. 


WEST PAKISTAN 


USNM 199671 (1, 90), near Karachi, received from El Husseini, 24 January 
1966. ZSI 1761 (1, 127, holotype of Psewdosynanceia melanostigma), Karachi. 
AMS B8183 (1, about 115), Karachi, purchased from Day in 1885 [This speci- 
men listed as type in AMS records but it is not]. SU 62409 (1, 75.7), vicinity 
of Karachi, M.A. El Husseini, 1963. 


INDIA 


CAS 14801 (1, 77.8), western India, north side of Okha Point, tide pool, Inter- 
national Indian Ocean Expedition, Anton Bruun Cruise No. 1, 9 March 1963. 
USNM 209423 (1, 53.9), western India, 22°54’N., 68°36’E., in 15.5 meters, 
International Indian Ocean Expedition, Anton Bruun Cruise No. 4B, sta. 223A, 
19 November 1963. 

DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Dorsal XV—XVII + 4-6, usually XVI + 4; 
anal III + 7-8; pectoral 14-15; pelvic I+ 3; all soft rays including pectoral 
rays unbranched; head depressed; eyes on dorsal surface, pointing mostly up- 
wards; mouth superior; no deep pits on head; body without prominent warts. 

DEscRIPTION. Dorsal fin with 15-17 spines, all spines slender but with 
prominent venom glands, all about same length. Dorsal soft rays 4—6, last single. 
Anal fin with 3 spines of nearly same length. Anal soft rays 7-8, last single. 
Pectoral fin long, reaching to over anal fin spines, with 14-16 (usually 15) un- 
branched rays. Pelvic fin small, with 1 spine and 3 unbranched soft rays. Gill 
rakers rudimentary, total 7-10, with 1-3 on upper arch and 6—7 on lower arch. 
Lateral line not visible to unaided eye (with magnification a subsurface canal 
usually can be seen at the normal location of the lateral line or slightly above; 
small raised papillae with pores are also scattered on the body, some forming a 
row below the dorsal fin, another group usually can be seen above the anal fin, 
parallel to the lateral line). 

Body shape and coloration as in figure 11. Head depressed, with mouth 
superior; eyes small, on dorsal surface, pointing mostly upwards, at least 4 eye 
diameters apart. Head with scattered low ridges, no deep pits on head. Head 
spines poorly developed. Preorbital bone with 2 lumps over maxillary. Four 


371 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 


(apis We] UO poz} wourtoeds) 


‘Ue ISTYeA ISAM 


“TS ‘wut 9/ “60rZ9 AS ‘I[Npe ‘vus7ysounjam piaauUDUksopnasg 


‘TT aunony 


372 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


preopercular spines present. Other spines developed as ridges or absent. Small 
teeth on jaws and vomer, none on palatines. Vertebrae 26 (2 specimens) or 
24° (Gl). 

Coloration in preservative (fig. 11) brown or gray to black on a pallid back- 
ground, lighter ventrally. Body darkest on caudal peduncle, then abruptly white 
at base of caudal fin. A broad subterminal brown or black bar on caudal fin, 
otherwise this fin pallid. A clear area on anterior part of soft dorsal fin extend- 
ing onto body. Soft dorsal fin dark distally. Spinous dorsal fin with dusky pig- 
ment concentrated near distal part of spines. Pectoral fin mostly pallid with a 
broad dark bar distally, fin rays tipped with white. Pectoral axil mostly pallid, 
with a few dark specks or reticulations usually present. Anal fin mostly dusky, 
darkest posteriorly. Pelvic fin rays pallid below, dark distally, with tips of rays 
pallid. In life, pallid areas are yellow, according to Blevad and L¢ppenthin 
(1944) and Khalaf (1961). 

CoMPARISONS. See the ‘Comparisons’ section for Leptosynanceia asteroblepa. 

DisTRIBUTION. This species is restricted in distribution; it is known only 
from the Persian Gulf to western India. It is a marine and estuarine species 
living on mud bottom. 


Genus Trachicephalus Swainson 

Trachicephalus Swainson, 1839, pp. 181, 268 (type-species Synanceia elongatus by original 
designation). 

Trichophasia SWAINSON, 1839, p. 61 (type-species Synanceia elongatus implied from text [see 
‘Nomenclatural remarks’ ]. 

Polycaulus GUNTHER, 1860, p. 175 (proposed as a replacement name for Trachicephalus 
Swainson) ; BLEEKER, 1874, p. 19 (description; nomenclature). 

Uranoblepus GiLL, 1861, footnote on p. 5 (proposed as a replacement name for Trachi- 
cephalus Swainson). 


NOMENCLATURAL REMARKS. As discussed by Gill (1905, p. 224) the replace- 
ment names Polycaulus and Uranoblepus were proposed because of the similarity 
of Trachicephalus and the earlier Trachycephalus (e.g., the reptile genus Trachy- 
cephalus Tschudi, 1838). Under the Rules of Zoological Nomenclature the two 
are etymologically different and Trachicephalus is not preoccupied. 

Both Trichophasia and Trachicephalus were proposed by Swainson (1839) 
for the same category as evidenced from the text (p. 61, pp. 180-181, and p. 
268) (see also our ‘Nomenclatural remarks’ under the genus Synanceia). Gill 
(1905, p. 224) appears to be the first to mention both names, and he selected 
Trachicephalus over Trichophasia. 

Dracnosis. See ‘Distinguishing features’ in the species account below. 


Trachicephalus uranoscopus (Bloch & Schneider). 
(Figure 12; tables 3-5.) 


Synanceja uranoscopa BLocH and SCHNEIDER, 1801, p. 195 (original description; type locality 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 373 


Tranquebar, India; spelling of genus on p. 194 corrected to Synanceia on p. 573) ; CUVIER 
in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829, pp. 458-459 (brief description; remarks). 

Uranoscopus indicus KuuHt and VAN HASSELT in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829, p. 456 
(nomen nudum); BLEEKER, 1849, p. 10 (as synonym of Synanceia elongata). 

Synancya elongata CUVIER in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829, pp. 456-458 (original descrip- 
tion; type locality Pondichery, India, and Java) ; BLEEKER, 1849, pp. 4, 10 (synonymy; 
brief description; range) ; 1861b, p. 72 (listed; Penang). 

Synanceia elongata, CUviER, 1837, p. viii, fig. 3 on Ichthyology pl. 27 (color plate). 

Trachicephalus elongatus, SWAINSON, 1839, p. 268 (as type of Trachicephalus). 

Synanceia breviceps RICHARDSON, 1845, pp. 71-72 (original description; type locality China) ; 
WHITEHEAD, 1969, pp. 205, 207 (types lost). 

Aploactis breviceps, RICHARDSON, 1846, p. 212 (placed in Aploactis; location of specimens). 

Synancia elongata, CANTOR, 1850, p. 1029 (synonymy; description; range). 

Uranoscopus adhesipinnis BiytH, 1860, p. 142 (original description; type locality India, 
from Calcutta fish market [some counts of fin rays low, probably inaccurate]). 

Polycaulus elongatus, GUNTHER, 1860, p. 174 (synonymy; description; osteology; collection 
data) ; KNErR, 1865, p. 120 (synonymy; description; range); BLEEKER, 1874, pp. 20-21, 
fig. 1 on pl. 2 (description; synonymy; range) ; 1879, fig. 2 on pl. CCCCXV (figure from 
Bleeker, 1874) ; SEALE, 1910, p. 286 (specimens from Borneo). 

Polycaulis uranoscopus, DAY, 1875, p. 164, fig. 6 on pl. XXXIX (synonymy; description; 
range; good figure); Herre and Myers, 1937, p. 34 (2 specimens [SU 30872] from 
Singapore). 

Trachicephalus uranoscopus, RUTTER, 1897, p. 81 (good description; specimens from China 
[SU 1758]) ; Fow er, 1929, p. 613 (listed; 4 specimens from Hong Kong) ; 1931, p. 305 
(specimens from Hong Kong; coloration; status of Trachicephalus). 

Polycaulus uranoscopus, FOWLER, 1935, p. 153 (one specimen from Bangkok, Thailand; 
“agrees with Bleeker’s figure of Polycaulus elongatus”) ; DE BEAUFORT in Weber and de 
Beaufort, 1962, pp. 102-103, fig. 29 (synonymy; description; distribution). 

Trachycephalus uranoscopus, FOWLER, 1938a, p. 36 (two specimens from Tai Po, China, and 
two from Hong Kong). 


MATERIAL EXAMINED. 


CHINA 


SU 1758 (6, 44.8-56.5), Swatow, A. M. Fielde. SU 25743 (2, 70.7—80.0), Can- 
ton, A. W. Herre. 


Honc KoNG 


SU 9853 (2, 47.0-63.1), P. L. Jouy. SU 39608 (2, 63.5-67.2), Aberdeen Fish 
Market, A. W. Herre, 1 June 1937. Plus USNM 143296 (1). 


SINGAPORE 
SU 30872 (2, 19.6-53.8), A. W. Herre, 3 March 1934. SU 34090 (7, 37.0-62.3), 


A. W. Herre, 8 May 1937. SU 39472 (1, 59.0), Siglap, A. W. Herre, 18 October 
1940. Plus USNM 142947 (1). 


THAILAND 


USNM 119657 (1, 40.5), Laem Sing, at mouth of Chanthaburi River, H. M. 
Smith, 17 July 1928. 


374 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 12. Trachycephalus uranoscopus, adult, India; figure from Day, 1875, fig. 6 on 
pl. 39. 


INDIA 


SU 14671 (2, 36.0-45.0), Marmagao Bay, S. Kemp. SU 14672 (2, 68.8-72.2), 
Madras, Ennur Fisheries Station, A. W. Herre, 6 January 1941; MNHN A905 
(3, 52.3-54.0, syntypes of S. elongata), Coramandel Coast, collected by 
Leschenault. 

DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Dorsal XI—XIII + 12-14, usually XII + 12; 
anal II + 12-14, usually II + 13; pectoral 14-15; pelvic I+ 5; all soft rays 
including pectoral rays unbranched; head depressed; eyes on dorsal surface of 
head, pointing mostly upwards; mouth superior; no deep pits on head; body 
without prominent warts. 

DescriPTION. Dorsal fin with 12 (11-13) spines, all spines about same 
length, flexible, difficult to distinguish from soft rays. Dorsal soft rays 12-14, 
usually 12, with last single. Pectoral fin moderate, reaching to level of anal 
spines, with 14-15 unbranched rays. Anal fin with 2 spines and 12-14, usually 
13, soft rays, last soft ray single. Pelvic fin base very long, reaching to level of 
vent, with 1 spine and 5 unbranched soft rays. Gill rakers rudimentary, total 
7-8, 2-3 on upper arch, 5 on lower arch. Lateral line difficult to observe with- 
out microscope, runs high up on flanks; total tubes about 12—14, anterior ones 
more prominent and with small bilobed flaps; additional papillae (with pores? ) 
scattered on body, a row present on body above anal fin and another above 
lateral line. 

Body shape and coloration as in figure 12. Head depressed, with superior 
mouth; eyes small and on dorsal surface of head, pointing upwards and out- 
wards, about 3 eye diameters apart. Head with scattered low ridges; two ridges 
run medially from eye, shallow occipital pit bordered by ridges, pit present be- 
tween eyes but occupied by ascending arms of premaxillaries; another ridge 
passes under eye; no deep pits on head. Head spines poorly developed. Pre- 
orbital bone with 2 or 3 short spines over maxillary. Preopercular bone with 4 
blunt spines. Other spines developed as lumps, ridges, or absent. Small teeth on 
jaws and vomer, none on palatines. Vertebrae 28-30, mostly 29. 

Body mostly tan or brown in preservative (figure 12). Lateral line pores and 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES as 


other pores on body sometimes surrounded by white. Distal portions of soft dor- 
sal, anal, caudal, and pectoral fins darker brown except caudal fin tipped with 
white and with pale area on dorsal and on ventral margin of caudal at about 
middle of fin (better marked in small specimens). 

ComPaARISONS. See the ‘Comparisons’ section under Leptosynanceia astero- 
blepa. 

DistriBuTion. Tvrachicephalus uranoscopus occurs from western India to 
China and south in the Malay Archipelago to Borneo. This species is associated 
with mud bottom areas and some captures have been in estuaries. 


Genus Leptosynanceia Bleeker 


Leptosynanceia BLEEKER, 1874, p. 17 (type-species Synanceia asteroblepa Richardson by 
monotypy). 


Dracnosis. See ‘Distinguishing features’ under the species account below. 


Leptosynanceia asteroblepa (Richardson). 
(Figure 13; tables 3-5.) 


Synanceia asteroblepa RicHARDSON, 1845, pp. 69-71, figs. 1-3 on pl. 39 (original description; 
type locality New Guinea; compared with species of Synanceia); BLEEKER, 1849, p. 4 
(listed; New Guinea) ; 1852a, p. 242 (listed; New Guinea) ; 1852b, pp. 419-420 (descrip- 
tion; rivers and estuaries of Borneo) ; GUNTHER, 1860, p. 147 (compiled) ; 1868, p. 265 
(listed; Sarawak) ; VINCIGUERRA, 1926, p. 539 (synonymy; listed; muddy rivers of Sara- 
wak; range). 

Leptosynanceia asteroblepa, BLEEKER, 1874, pp. 17-18, fig. 2 on pl. 4 (as type of a new genus; 
description; specimens from Borneo; good figure); 1878, p. 49 (listed; New Guinea) ; 
1879, fig. 6 on pl. CCCCXVI (figure from Bleeker, 1874) ; Fowier, 1928, p. 298, fig. 51 
(brief synonymy and description; L. greenmani as a synonym); HERRE and Myers, 
1937, p. 34 (description; specimen from Sumatra, 100 miles west of Singapore [SU 
30870]) ; Munro, 1967, p. 539 (in key; New Guinea). 

Leptosynanceia greenmani Fowler, 1905, pp. 507-510, fig. 12 (original description; type 
locality Borneo; compared with Leptosynanceia asteroblepa; [holotype ANSP 114884, 
2 paratypes ANSP 114885-6]). 


MATERIAL EXAMINED. 
BORNEO 


ANSP 114884 (1 specimen, 117 mm. S.L., holotype of L. greenmani), Baram, 
Borneo, A. C. Harrison, Jr., and H. M. Hiller, 1897; ANSP 114885 (1, 103, 
paratype of L. greenmani), and ANSP 114886 (1, 87.2, paratype of L. green- 
mani), Baram, Borneo, W. H. Furness, 1898. 


SUMATRA 


SU 30870 (1, 49.7), 100 mi. west of Singapore, A. W. Herre, 27 March 1934. 


DISTINGUISHING FEATURES. Dorsal XVI + 5; anal IIJ-IV + 5-6; pectoral 
13—15, usually 14; pelvic I + 4; all soft rays including pectoral rays unbranched; 


376 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRroc. 4TH Serr. 


FicureE 13. Leptosynanceia asteroblepa, adult, New Guinea; figure from Richardson, 
1844, fig. 1 on pl. 39. 


head depressed; eyes on dorsal surface, directed mostly upwards; mouth superior ; 
no deep pits on head; body without prominent warts. 

DEscRIPTION. Dorsal fin with 16 spines, all spines about same length, firm 
but of small diameter, with small venom glands at about midheight of spines. 
Dorsal soft rays 5, unbranched, last single. Anal fin with 3—4 spines and 5-6 
unbranched soft rays, last single. Pectoral fin reaching to over anal spines, 
upper rays the longest, with 13-15 rays, all unbranched. Pelvic fin short, with 1 
spine and 4 unbranched soft rays. Gill rakers rudimentary, 3 on upper arch, 8 
or 9 on lower arch (in one specimen). Lateral line runs high up on back, with 
11 tubes, last on caudal fin; additional papillae (with pores?) visible on body 
with microscope, a row of them present above anal fin. 

Body shape and coloration as in figure 13. Head depressed, with mouth 
superior; eyes small and on dorsal surface of head, eyes pointing mostly up- 
wards, about 3 eye diameters apart. Head with scattered low ridges; shallow 
pits present but none prominent. Most head spines poorly developed. Preorbital 
bone with 2 lumps over maxillary. Preopercular bone with 5 well marked spines. 
Opercular spines well defined. Other spines developed as lumps or ridges or 
absent. Small teeth on jaws, none on vomer and palatines. Vertebrae 28 (1 
specimen ). 

Specimens available to us mostly faded. Fowler (1905) reports body pale 
brown, scarcely paler below, head finely mottled or marbled with darker brown, 
and back and sides with numerous large deep brownish blotches. Fins also simi- 
larly marked. Soft dorsal, anal, and caudal darker distally but with a white 
margin. Bleeker (1874) illustrates a brownish-yellow fish, mottled with large 
dark areas, fins dark distally, tinge of pink on fins. 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES Si] 


ComPaARIsoNs. The genera Pseudosynanceia, Trachicephalus, and Lepto- 
synanceia each contain a single species. These species are more elongate (and 
resemble uranoscopid fishes in outward appearance) than the other more globular 
species treated in this paper. The pelvic rays are I + 3 in Pseudosynanceia, I + 
4 in Leptosynanceia, and 1+ 5 in Trachicephalus. Pseudosynanceia resembles 
Leptosynanceia, and differs from Trachicephalus, in having a high dorsal spine 
count (usually XVI + 4 in Pseudosynanceia, XVI + 5 in Leptosynanceia, and 
XII + 12 in Trachicephalus). Significant differences in anal counts are also 
found (III + 7-8 in Pseudosynanceia, IJ + 12-14 in Trachicephalus, and usu- 
ally IV + 5 in Leptosynanceia). These external differences are extensive and 
serve to distinguish the species from each other. A more detailed study is needed, 
but it would appear that these differences warrant separate genera for these 
species. 

DISTRIBUTION. We know this species only from Singapore, Sumatra, Borneo, 
and New Guinea. It is reported to inhabit estuaries and rivers. 


LITERATURE CITED 


Acassiz, L. 

1845. Nomenclator zoologicus, continens nomina systematica generum animalium tam 
viventium quam fossilium, secundum ordinem alphabeticum disposita, adjectis 
auctoribus libris, in quibus referiuntur, anno editionis, etymologia et familiis, ad 
quas pertinent, in singulis classibus. Soloduri, xii + 393 pp. [1842-1846, Pisces 
in fasciculus VII and VIII, 1845.] 

BLEEKER, P. 

1849. Bijdrage tot de kennis der Scleroparei van den Soenda-Molukschen Archipel. 
Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch Gennootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschap- 
pen, vol. 22, pp. 1-10. 

1852a. Bijdrage tot de kennis der ichthyologische fauna van de Moluksche eilanden. 
Visschen van Amboina en Ceram. Natuurkundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch 
Indié, vol. 3, pp. 229-309. 

1852b. Zesde bijdrage tot de kennis der ichthyologische fauna van Borneo. Natuurkundig 
Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch Indié, vol. 3, pp. 407-442. 

1861. Iets over de vischfauna van het eiland Pinang. Verslagen en Mededeelingen der 
Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeeling Natuurkunde, vol. 12, part 
1, pp. 64-80. 

1863. Onziéme notice sur la faune ichthyologique de l’ile de Ternate. Nederlandsch 
Tijdschrift voor de Dierkunde, uitgegeven door het Koninklijk Zoologisch Geno- 
otschap Natura Artis Magistra, te Amsterdam, vol. 1, pp. 228-238. 

1873. Mémoire sur la faune ichthyologique de Chine. Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor de 
Dierkunde, uitgegeven door het Koninklijk Zodlogisch Genootschap Natura Artis 
Magistra, te Amsterdam, vol. 4, pp. 113-154. 

1874. Révision des espéces insulindiennes de la famille des Synancéoides. Natuurkundige 
Verhandelingen van der Hollandsche Maatschappij der Wetenschappen, 3rd 
series, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1-22, 4 col. pls. 

1878a. Quatriéme mémoire sur la faune ichthyologique de la Nouvelle-Guinée. Archives 
Néerlandaises des Sciences exactes et naturelles publiées par la Société Hol- 
landaise des Sciences 4 Harlem, vol. 13, pp. 35-66, pls. 2-3. 


378 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


1878b. Atlas ichthyologique des Indes Orientales Néerlandaises, publié sous les auspices 
du Gouvernement Colonial Néerlandais, vol. 9, livr. 36. Fréd. Miller, Amster- 
dam, pp. 41-80, pls. CCCCXI-CCCCXX. 

Buecvap, H., AND B. L@PPENTHIN 
1944. Fishes of the Iranian Gulf. Einar Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 247 pp., 135 figs., 
12 pls. 
Biocu, Marc ELIESER 
1787. Naturgeschichte der auslandischen Fische. Berlin, vol. 2, xii + 260 pp., pls. 
Biocu, MArc ELIESER, AND J. G. SCHNEIDER 
1801. Systema ichthyologiae iconibus cx illustratum. Berolini, lx + 584 pp., 110 col. pls. 
BLytH, EDWARD 

1860. On some fishes from the Sitang River and its tributary streams. Journal of the 

Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. 29, pp. 138-174. 
BorseMAN, M. 

1947. Revision of the fishes collected by Burger and Von Siebold in Japan. E. J. Brill, 

Leiden, 242 pp., 5 pls. 
Briccs, JOHN C. 

1961. Emendated generic names in Berg’s Classification of Fishes. Copeia, 1961, no. 2, 

pp. 161-166. 
CANTOR, THEODORE 

1850. Catalogue of Malayan fishes. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. 

18, pt. 2, pp. i-xill, 983-1443, 14 pls. 
CUVIER, GEORGES 
1837. The Animal Kingdom . . . London, plates, vol. 2 (text vol. 2 published in 1834). 
xxii pp. + Herpetology pls. 1-40, Ichthyology pls. 1-80, Osteology pls. 1-7. 
Cuvier, GEORGES, AND ACHILLE VALENCIENNES 
1829. Histoire naturelle des poissons. F. G. Levrault, Paris, vol. 4, xxxvi + 518 pp. 
Day, FRANCIS 

1875-1878. The fishes of India; being a natural history of the fishes known to inhabit 
the seas and fresh water of India, Burma, and Ceylon. Bernard Quaritch, Lon- 
don, vol. 1, text: xx + 816 pp.; Atlas: 195 pls. [The fishes of India was pub- 
lished in four sections from 1875-1878; scorpaenids included in 1875.] 

1888. The fishes of India...Supplement. William and Norgate, London, pp. 779-816. 

ESCHMEYER, WILLIAM N. 

1969. A systematic review of the scorpionfishes of the Atlantic Ocean (Pisces: Scor- 
paenidae). Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, no. 79, 130 
pp., 13 figs. 

1971. Two new Atlantic scorpionfishes. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sci- 
ences, vol. 37, no. 17, pp. 501-508, 2 figs. 

Fow.Ler, HENRY W. 
1905. Some fishes from Borneo. Proceedings of The Academy of Natural Sciences of 
Philadelphia, vol. 57, pp. 455-523, 16 figs. 

1928. The fishes of Oceania. Memoirs of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, vol. 10, iii 
+ 540 pp., 82 figs., 49 pls. 

1929. Notes on Japanese and Chinese fishes. Proceedings of The Academy of Natural 
Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 81, pp. 589-616, 2 figs. 

1931. Studies of Hong Konk fishes—no. 2. Hong Kong Naturalist, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 287— 
317, 16 figs. 

1935. Zoological results of the Third De Schauensee Siamese Expedition, Part VI. — 


Vor. XXXIX] ESCHMEYER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 379 


Fishes obtained in 1934. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of 
Philadelphia, vol. 87, pp. 89-163, 132 figs. 
1938a. Studies of Hong Kong fishes—no. 3. The Hong Kong Naturalist, Supplement no. 
6, 52 pp., 5 figs. 
1938b. A list of the fishes known from Malaya. Fisheries Bulletin, Government Printing 
Office of Singapore, no. 1, 268 + Ivi pp. 
FRANZ, VICTOR 
1910. Die japanischen Knochenfische der Sammlungen Haberer und Doflein. Jn Beitrage 
zur Naturgeschichte Ostasiens herausgegeben von Dr. F. Doflein. Abhandlungen 
der mathematisch-physikalischen Klasse der KOniglich Bayerischen Akademie der 
Wissenschaften, IV. Supplement-Band, 1. Abhandlung. 135 pp., 11 pls., 7 figs. 
GILL, THEODORE 
1861. Catalogue of the fishes of the eastern coast of North America, from Greenland to 
Georgia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 
for 1861, Supplement, 63 pp. 
1905. Note on the genera of synanceine and pelorine fishes. Proceedings of the United 
States National Museum, vol. 28, no. 1394, pp. 221-225, 1 fig. 
Gray, JOHN EpWArpD 
1830-1835. Illustrations of Indian Zoology; chiefly selected from the collection of Major- 
General Hardwicke, F.R.S. London. 202 col. pls. [see Sawyer, 1953, for dates of 
publication of individual plates]. 
1854. Catalogue of fish collected and described by Laurence Theodore Gronow, now in 
the British Museum. London, vii + 196 pp. 
GUNTHER, ALBERT 
1860. Catalogue of the acanthopterygian fishes in the collection of the British Museum, 
vol. 2, xxi + 548 pp. 
1868. Description of two new gobioid fishes from Sarawak. The Annals and Magazine 
of Natural History, series 4, vol. 1, pp. 264-266, 1 pl. 
HatLstEApD, Bruce W. 
1970. Poisonous and venomous marine animals of the world, vol. 3 — Vertebrates con- 
tinued. United States Government Printing Office, xxv + 1006 pp. 
HErRRE, ALBERT W.C.T. 
1951. A review of the scorpaenid fishes of the Philippines and adjacent seas. The Philip- 
pine Journal of Science, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 381-502. 
HeErrE, ALBERT W.C.T., AND GEORGE S. MYERS 
1937. A contribution to the ichthyology of the Malay Peninsula. Bulletin of the Raffles 
Museum, Singapore, no. 13, pp. 5-75, pls. 1-7. 
ISHIKAWA, C., AND K. MAtsutraA 
1897. Preliminary catalog of fishes including Dipnoi, Cyclostomi and Cephalochorda in 
the collection of the Natural History Department, Imperial Museum. Tokyo, 64 
pp. (In Japanese). 
JorpANn, DAvip STARR 
1896. Notes on fishes, little known or new to science. Proceedings of the California 
Academy of Sciences, second series, vol. 6, pp. 201-244, pls. 20-43. 
1919. The genera of fishes, part II, from Agassiz to Bleeker, 1833-1858 . . . Leland 
Stanford Junior University Publications, University Series, ix + pp. 163-284 + 
xiii. 
JorpAN, DAvip STARR, AND CARL LEAvitT HUBBS 
1925. Records of fishes obtained by David Starr Jordan in Japan, 1922. Memoirs of the 
Carnegie Museum, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 93-342, pl. 10. 


380 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


JorpANn, Davip STARR, AND EDWIN CHAPIN STARKS 
1904. A review of the scorpaenoid fishes of Japan. Proceedings of the United States 
National Museum, vol. 27, no. 1351, pp. 91-175, 2 pls., 21 figs. 
Jorpan, DAvip STARR, AND WILLIAM F. THOMPSON 
1914. Records of the fishes obtained in Japan, 1911. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum, 
vol. VI, no. 4, pp. 205-313, pls. 24-42. 
KEEGAN, H. L., R. E. WEAVER, S. TOSHIOKA, AND T. Matsu1 
1964. Some venomous and noxious animals of East and Southeast Asia. Bio-Medical 
Reports of the 406th Medical Laboratory, U. S. Navy Medical Command, Japan, 
no. 7, third edition, revised, iii + 43 pp., 53 figs. 
Kuarar, KAMEL T. 
1961. The marine and fresh water fishes of Iraq. Al-Rabitta Press, Baghdad. 164 pp. 
Kner, R. 
1865. Reise der 6sterreichischen Fregatte Novara um die Erde in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 
1859... Zoologischer Theil. Fische. Abtheilung 2, pp. 111-272, pls. 6-11. 
LACEPEDE, C. 
1801. Histoire naturelle des poissons. Chez Plasson, Paris, vol. 5, cxi + 414 pp., 12 pls. 
LINNAEUS, CAROLUS 
1766. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, 
cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. 12th edition, revised. Vol. 1. 
Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 532 pp. 
MATSUBARA, KYOMATSU 
1943. Studies on the scorpaenoid fishes of Japan (I and II). The Transactions of the 
Sigenkagaku Kenkyusyo, nos. 1 and 2, 486 pp., 156 figs., 4 pls. 
McCuttocu, A. R. 
1921. Notes and illustrations of Queensland fishes, no. 2. Memoirs of the Queensland 
Museum, vol. 7, part 3, pp. 164-178, pls. 8-11. 
1929. A check-list of the fishes recorded from Australia. The Australian Museum 
Sydney, memoir 5, part 3, pp. 329-436. 
MEEs, G. F. 
1960. Additions to the fish fauna of western Australia—2. Fisheries Department, West- 
ern Australia, Fisheries Bulletin no. 9, pt. 2, pp. 13-21. 
1964. A new fish of the family Scorpaenidae from New Guinea. Zoolologische Medede- 
lingen Uitgegeven door het Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie te Leiden, 
vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1-4, pl. 1. 
MULLER, JOHANNES 
1843. Bertrage zur Kenntniss der natiirlichen Familien der Fische. Archiv fur 
Natiirgeschichte. Gegriindet von A.F.A. Wiegmann. Jahrgang 9, Band 1, pp. 
292-330. 
Munro, IAN S. R. 
1967. The fishes of New Guinea. Department of Agriculture, Stock and Fisheries, Port 
Moresby, New Guinea, 650 pp., 84 pls. 
Nystrom, E. 
1887. Redogorelse for den Japanska fisksamlingen i Upsala Universitets Zoologiska Mu- 
seum. Bihang till Kongl. Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, vol. 13, 
pt. 4, no. 4, pp. 1-54. 
Ocisy, J. Douctas 
1910a.On new or insufficiently described fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of 
Queensland, vol. 23, pp. 1-55. 


VoL. XXXIX] ESCHMEYVER & RAMA RAO: NEW STONEFISHES 381 


1910b. “Endeavour Series No. 1.”’ On some new fishes from the Queensland coast. (Is- 
sued December 20, 1910, as author’s preprint to appear in the Proceedings of the 
Royal Society of Queensland, vol. 23, pp. 85-139. Withheld by the Council of 
the Royal Society of Queensland from publication in the Proceedings.) 
RICHARDSON, JOHN 
1842. Contributions to the ichthyology of Australia. The Annals and Magazine of 
Natural History, New Series, vol. 9, no. 59, art. 42, pp. 384-393. 
1844-1845. Ichthyology zm The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Sulphur, under the 
command of Sir Edward Belcher, R.N., C.B., F.R.G.S., etc., during the years 
1836-42, vol. 1, pp. 50-150, pls. 35-64. 
1846. Report on the ichthyology of the seas of China and Japan. Report of the Fifteenth 
Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science held at Cam- 
bridge in June 1845, pp. 187-320. 
RUTTER, CLOUDSLEY 
1897. A collection of fishes obtained in Swatow, China by Miss Adele M. Fielde. Pro- 
ceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. for 1897, pp. 
56-90. 
SAWYER, F. C. 
1953. The dates of issue of J. E. Gray’s “Illustrations of Indian Zoology” (London, 
1830-1835). The Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural His- 
tory, vol. 3, part 1, pp. 48-55. 
ScHmipt, P. J. 
1931. Fishes of Japan, collected in 1901. Transactions of the Pacific Committee of the 
Academy of Sciences of the USSR, vol. 2, pp. 1-176, 30 figs. 
SEALE, ALVIN 
1901. Report of a mission to Guam. Part I—Avifauna. Part I].—Fishes. Occasional 
Papers of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum of Polynesian Ethnology and 
Natural History, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 17-128. (Fishes on pp. 61-128.) 
1906. Fishes of the South Pacific. Occasional Papers of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Mu- 
seum of Polynesian Ethnology and Natural History, vol. 4, no. 1, 89 pp., 23 figs. 
1910. Fishes of Borneo, with descriptions of four new species. The Philippine Journal 
of Science, vol. 5, no. 4, sect. D, pp. 263-288. 
SHAW, GEORGE 
1803. General zoology or systematic natural history. Pisces, vol. 4, pt. 2, pp. i-xili, 187— 
632, pls. 26-92. 
SmiTH, J. L. B. 
1958. Fishes of the families Tetrarogidae, Caracanthidae, and Synanciidae, from the 
western Indian Ocean with further notes on scorpaenid fishes. Ichthyological 
Bulletin, Rhodes University, no. 12, pp. 167-181, pls. 7-8. 
STEINDACHNER, FRANZ, AND L. DODERLEIN 
1884. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Fische Japan’s. (III.). Denkschriften der Mathe- 
matisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Classe der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissen- 
schaften, Wien, vol. 49, pp. 171-212, pls. 1-7. 
SWAIN, JOSEPH 
1882. An identification of the species of fishes described in Shaw’s General Zoology. 
Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. for 1882, 
pp. 303-309. 
SWAINSON, WILLIAM 
1839. The natural history of fishes, amphibians, & reptiles, or monocardian animals. 
London, vol. 2, vi + 448 pp., 135 text figs. 


382 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


TAYLOR, WILLIAM R. 
1964. Fishes of Arnhem Land. Records of the American-Australian Scientific Expedition 
to Arnhem Land, vol. 4, pt. 3, pp. 45-307. 
TEMMINCK, C. J., AND H. SCHLEGEL 
1843. Fauna Japonica, sive descriptio animalium, quae in itinere per Japoniam, .. . 
suscepto, annis 1823-1830 collegit, notis, observationibus et adumbrationibus il- 
lustravit Ph. Fr. de Siebold. Conjunctis studiis C. J. Temminck et H. Schlegel 
pro vertebratis elaborata. Pisces, 323 pp., 160 col. pls. [Pisces published in six 
parts, 1842-1850; scorpaenids in part 2, 1843, pp. 21-72.] 
VINCIGUERRA, D. 
1926. Catalogo dei pesci raccolti a Borneo dai Sigg. Marchese G. Doria e Dott. O. Bec- 
cari negli anni 1865-67. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Giacomo 
Doria, vol. 50 (Series 3, vol. 10), pp. 532-638, pl. 1. 
WEBER, MAx, AND L. F. DE BEAUFORT 
1962. The fishes of the Indo-Australian Archipelago. XI. Scleroparei, Hypostomides, 
Pediculati, Plectognathi, Opisthomi, Discocephali, Xenopterygii. E. J. Brill, 
Leiden, 481 pp., 100 text figs. 
WHITEHEAD, P. J. P. 
1969. The Reeves collection of Chinese fish drawings. Bulletin of the British Museum 
(Natural History), Historical Series, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 193-233, 29 pls. 
WHITLEY, GILBERT P. 
1930. Ichthyological miscellanea. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, vol. 10, part 1, 
pp. 8-31, 1 pl. 
1932a. Fishes. Scientific Reports, Great Barrier Reef Expedition 1928-29, vol. 4, no. 9, 
pp. 267-316, 5 text figs., 4 pls. 
1932b. Studies in ichthyology. No. 6. Records of the Australian Museum, Sydney, vol. 
18, no. 6, pp. 321-348, pls. 36-39, 3 text figs. 
1960. Stonefishes (Family Synancejidae). The Australian Museum, leaflet no. 32, 6 
unnumbered pp. 
1964. Presidential address. A survey of Australian ichthyology. Proceedings of the 
Linnean Society of New South Wales, vol. 89, part 1, pp. 11-127. 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 19, pp. 383-410; 7 figs.; 1 table. October 24, 1973 


GOGOLIA FILEWOODI, A NEW GENUS 
AND SPECIES OF SHARK FROM 
NEW GUINEA 
(CARCHARHINIFORMES: TRIAKIDAE), 
WITH A REDEFINITION OF THE FAMILY 
TRIAKIDAE AND A KEY TO 
TRIAKID GENERA 


By 


L. J. V. Compagno 
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, 
Stanford, California 94305 


INTRODUCTION 


On the night of July 18-19, 1970, Mr. Komet Kisokau handlined a peculiar 
small shark in Astrolabe Bay, off the Gogol River near Madang, New Guinea. 
Mr. Kisokau and Mr. R. T. Gibson (Fisheries Officer, Madang, and a former 
shark fisherman) recognized the unusual nature of the specimen and sent it to 
Mr. L. W. Filewood (Biologist-In-Charge of the Department of Agriculture, 
Stock and Fisheries, Konedobu, Papau-New Guinea), who is currently studying 
the elasmobranchs of the New Guinean region. Mr. Filewood discovered that 
the specimen represented a new genus and species of triakid and intended to 
describe it in collaboration with the present writer. Unfortunately Mr. File- 
wood was unable to participate in this task and generously relinquished both 
it and the specimen to me. 


Gogolia Compagno, new genus 


TYPE SPECIES. Gogolia filewoodi Compagno, new species. 
DERIVATION OF NAME. Gogolia (considered feminine), from the Gogol River 
of Northern New Guinea. 


[383] 


[Proc. 4TH Ser. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


384 


‘TOO-8S891 ‘J ‘OU Wnasny, URTTRAYsNY ‘o[euLoy y[Mpe “WU HEY ‘adA}O[OY Jo MarA [e19}e'T ‘satsads puv snues mou ‘ousedwog spoomapy{ vy0S0H “| aunorg 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 385 


GENERIC DEFINITION. (Terminology follows Compagno, 1970; Compagno 
and Springer, 1971; and Compagno, 1973a.). Triakid sharks with a moderately 
long head, length from snout tip to level of 5th gill openings about 1.4-1.5 times 
the distance between the dorsal fin bases and about 22—24 percent of total length. 
Head and snout acutely wedge-shaped and blunt-tipped in lateral view (figs. 1, 
2F). Outline of snout bell-shaped in dorsoventral view (fig. 2D—E) and para- 
bolic in front of nostrils. Snout very long, preoral length (distance from snout 
tip to upper symphysis) about 1.6—1.7 times mouth width and 2.1—2.2 in head 
length. Subocular ridges very strong and prominently visible in dorsal view of 
head (fig. 2D: SOR) and blocking off view of eyes ventrally (fig. 2E). Eyes 
very large, elliptical, and about twice as long as high. Nictitating lower eyelid 
external and having a diagonal edge (fig. 2A: NLE). Subocular pouch shallow 
and entirely covered with denticles. Gill openings very small, width of 3rd about 
2.2—5.2 in eye length. Anterior nasal flaps very low and virtually vestigial (fig. 
2B: ANF), not barbel-like or greatly expanded. Posterior ends of anterior na- 
sal flaps well forward of mouth (fig. 2E). No nasoral grooves. Nasal cavities 
communicating to the exterior only by narrow incurrent and excurrent apertures 
(fig. 2B: INA and EXA), not exposed ventrally. Internarial width about 2.0 
times nostril widths. Nostrils about 2.5 times farther from the snout tip than 
from the mouth. Mouth arcuate in shape (fig. 2E). Mouth very short, its length 
from level of upper symphysis to level of mouth corners 2.5—3.0 in width of 
mouth between corners. Lower jaw very flat, with its sides hardly protruding 
or not showing below ventral surface of head in lateral view (figs. 1, 2F). Upper 
labial furrows extending anteriorly to level of upper symphysis. 

Tooth-row counts 40—-41/35 (2). 2-3/2-4 series of teeth functional. Pre- 
medial edges of most teeth convex and undifferentiated, but in adult the medials 
and some upper anteroposteriors have premedial cusplets or strong serrations 
(figs. 3C—D, 4A). Primary cusps very strong on all teeth except for the last 
lower posteriors (fig. 4B: teeth nos. 14-15). Postlateral edges of crowns 
strongly notched in all cusped teeth, these differentiated basally into postlateral 
cusplets or blades. Roots of teeth relatively low (fig. 3C-H: RT). Teeth 
strongly compressed, sharp-edged, and blade-like, but not molariform. Teeth 
not enlarged at symphysis to form a knob and not extending onto edges and 
ventral surface of lower jaw. Tooth-row groups poorly differentiated and includ- 
ing medials (fig. 4: M) and anteroposteriors (fig. 4A, teeth nos. 1-20; and fig. 
4B, teeth nos. 1-15) in both jaws. Medials have erect or semioblique cusps and 
relatively higher and narrower crowns than the lower, broader, oblique-cusped 
anteroposteriors. Dignathic heterodonty strong in anteroposteriors near sym- 
physis, but much weaker near the ends of the dental bands. In an adult these 


4TH SER. 


[ Proc. 


MY OF SCIENCES 


CALIFORNIA ACADE 


386 


VoL, XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 387 


parasymphysial anteroposteriors have premedial cusplets or serrations, narrow 
cusps, prominent transverse ridges or striations, and more postlateral cusplets 
in the upper jaw, while lower teeth have no premedial cusplets and very few 
postlateral ones, broader cusps, and no ridges (compare fig. 3C-E with F-H). 

Interdorsal ridge present in adult and absent in fetus. Caudal peduncle short, 
its length from second dorsal insertion to upper caudal origin about % of sec- 
ond dorsal base. Lateral trunk denticles from dorsum below first dorsal fin with 
teardrop-shaped crowns that are considerably longer than wide and have rudi- 
mentary lateral cusps or none (fig. 3A-B). 

Longest distal radials of pectoral fin skeleton about 1.6 times as long as long- 
est proximal radials (fig. 5|A-B: DRA and PRA). Anterior margins of pelvic 
fins about % as long as pectoral anterior margins. 

First dorsal origin far anterior, varying from over pectoral insertions to 
about over pectoral midbases. Free rear tip of first dorsal slightly posterior to 
pelvic origins. First dorsal base extremely long (figs. 1, 2F), its length almost 
equal to length of dorsal caudal margin, 2.3-3.2 times the first dorsal height, 
and 1.3—1.4 times the distance between dorsal bases. Second dorsal much smaller 
than first, its height about 7 of first dorsal height and its base length less than 
half of first dorsal base. Anal fin smaller than second dorsal, its height 0.5— 
0.6 of second dorsal height and its base 0.5—0.7 of second dorsal base. Anal 
insertion slightly anterior to second dorsal insertion by a distance about 0.1—0.2 
of second dorsal base. 

Caudal fin with a short but strong ventral caudal lobe in adult but a weak 
one in a fetus (figs. 1, 2F). Postventral caudal margin shallowly indented but 
not deeply notched. Length of terminal caudal sector from subterminal notch 
to tip of caudal about 3.1—3.8 in length of dorsal caudal margin. 

Cranium with a long rostrum, with the length of the medial rostral cartilage 
from its base to the anterior edge of the rostral node about 1.4—-1.9 in nasobasal 
length (distance from the base of the medial rostral cartilage to the postero- 
ventral edge of the occipital centrum, here used as an independent variable for 
cranial proportions). Bases of lateral rostral cartilages connected by a ridge 
(fig. 6A, C: RRF) to the edge of the anterior fontanelle. Nasal capsules trans- 


Ficure 2. Gogolia filewoodi. A-E, photographs from 739 mm. holotype. A, left eye in 
lateral view. B, left nostril in ventral view. C, valvular intestine cut longitudinally to show 
spiral valve. D, head, dorsal view. E, head, ventral view. F, photograph in lateral view of 
224 mm. fetus, CAS—27588. All scale lines equal 1 centimeter. Abbreviations: ANF, anterior 
nasal flap; EXA, excurrent aperture; INA, incurrent aperture; MNF, mesonarial flap; NLE, 
nictitating lower eyelid; PNF, posterior nasal flap; SLE, secondary lower eyelid; SOP, sub- 
ocular pouch; SOR, subocular ridge; SP, spiracle; UE, upper eyelid. 


388 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


ee + 
BG ™N BL Bi 


Ficure 3. Gogolia filewoodi. A, crowns of lateral trunk denticles from dorsum below 
first dorsal fin, 739 mm. holotype. B, same from 224 mm. fetus. C—E, teeth from 739 mm. 
holotype. Labial (C), lingual (D), and lateral (E) views of tooth from 4th upper anteropos- 
terior row (numbered from symphysis). Labial (F), lingual (G), and lateral (H) views of 
tooth from 4th lower anteroposterior row. Abbreviations: BG, basal groove; BL, basal 
ledge; CR, crown; PC, primary cusp; PLAS, postlateral attachment surface of root; PLC, 
postlateral cusplets; PMAS, premedial attachment surface of root; PMC, premedial cusplets; 
PME, premedial edge; RT, root; TG, transverse groove; TN, transverse notch; TR, trans- 
verse ridges. 


versely elongated and anteriorly flattened, not circular (fig. 6: NC). Nasal 
fontanelles delimited anteriorly from nasal apertures (fig. 6B: NA and NF). 
Nasal openings of orbitonasal canals inside nasal capsules and well behind pos- 
terior edges of nasal fontanelles. Thickened ridges or ectethmoid condyles (fig. 
6B—C: ECN) present on nasal capsules and articulating with the orbital pro- 
cesses of the palatoquadrates (fig. 7B—-C). A depression or subethmoid fossa 
(fig. 6B: SEF) present on the ventral surface of the cranium between the ecteth- 
moid condyles. Basal plate very narrow across orbital notches (fig. 6B: NP), 
its transverse width there about 3.0 in nasobasal length. Two pairs of arterial 
foramina present on basal plate, one for the internal carotid arteries and one 
for the stapedial or orbital arteries (fig. 6B: FC and FS). Least width across 
supraorbital crests (transverse to the long axis of the cranium) about 2.4 in 
nasobasal length. Postorbital processes short and shallowly notched distally 
(fig. 6: PT). Suborbital shelves narrow and not laterally expanded, ear-shaped, 
fenestrate, or notched. Greatest width across suborbital shelves (perpendicular 
to the long axis of cranium) about 1.7 in nasobasal length. 


Vor. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 389 


Total vertebral counts 180 (2). No stutter zone of alternating long and 
short centra in vertebral column. Thoracic vertebral centra with strong diagonal 
calcified lamellae (fig. 5D-E: DCL). 

Other characteristics of Gogolia those of the family Triakidae and of the 
single species (see below). 


FAMILIAL CLASSIFICATION OF GOGOLIA 


Gogolia is a genus that, with Hemitriakis and Jago, stands midway between 
the families Carcharhinidae and Triakidae (or their equivalents) as defined 
by Garman (1913), White (1936, 1937), Bigelow and Schroeder (1948), and 
Garrick and Schultz (1963). According to these workers, triakids have several 
functional series of small, molariform or blade-like and multicuspidate teeth 
and ‘nictitating folds,’ whereas carcharhinids have not more than 1 or 2 series 
of small to large, blade-like teeth and ‘nictitating membranes.’ The failure of 
these characters to distinguish the two families is discussed elsewhere (Com- 
pagno, 1970). Gogolia itself has a ‘nictitating fold’ but has small, blade-like 
teeth in 2—4 functional series. 

Previously I resolved the problem of triakid-carcharhinid intergradation by 
the unsatisfactory expedient of merging the two families (Compagno, 1970). 
Subsequent work on a revision of carcharhinoid genera indicated that a group 
of genera partially corresponding to the family Triakidae of White (1937) could 
be separated from the Carcharhinidae. 

Part of the difficulty in separating the families Carcharhinidae and Triaki- 
dae of White (1937) and Bigelow and Schroeder (1948) was that each of the 
two families contained genera closer to the type genus of the other family than 
to its own type genus. Thus Triaenodon has many external, cranial, pectoral 
fin skeleton, and cephalic myological characters that ally it closely with typical 
carcharhinids such as Carcharhinus, but the strong cusplets on its teeth led many 
workers to place 77iaenodon incorrectly in the Triakidae. Galeorhinus has often 
been placed in the Carcharhinidae but it similarly has many characters that 
indicate close affinities with the Triakidae. Also, Galeorhinus is linked with the 
genera Tviakis and Mustelus by a group of roughly intermediate forms (Gogolia, 
Hypogaleus, lago, Furgaleus, and Hemitriakis). 

The reinstated family Triakidae includes the genera Mustelus Linck, 1790; 
Galeorhinus Blainville, 1816; Triakis Miller and Henle, 1838a; Scylliogaleus 
Boulenger, 1902; Hemitriakis Herre, 1923; Furgaleus Whitley, 1951; Hypo- 
galeus J. L. B. Smith, 1957a; Jago Compagno and Springer, 1971; Allomycter 
Guitart, 1972; and Gogolia. Triaenodon Miller and Henle, 1837 is transferred 
to the Carcharhinidae (see also Gohar and Mazhar, 1964, and Kato, Springer, 
and Wagner, 1967, for discussion of the familial position of Triaenodon). The 
“scyliorhiniform triakoids” (Compagno, 1970) have often been placed in the 


390 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


family Triakidae or its equivalents and included in the genus Tviakis. How- 
ever, these genera, including Proscyllium Hilgendorf, 1904, Eridacnis H. M. 
Smith, 1913, Ctenacis Compagno, 1973a, and Gollum Compagno, 1973a, are 
sufficiently distinct from triakids to require a separate family, Proscylliidae 
(elevation of subfamily Proscylliinae Fowler, 1941). Leptocharias A. Smith, in 
Miiller and Henle, 1838a is difficult to place but probably is best placed in its 
own family, Leptochariidae (elevation of tribe Leptochariana Gray, 1851) owing 
to its morphological distinctness from other carcharhinoids. Leptocharias has 
often been grouped with the triakids in proximity to Triaenodon, but these two 
genera are not closely related. 
The Triakidae can be defined as follows: 


Family TRIAk1paE Gray, 1851, new rank 


Subfamily Musteli BonAPARTE, 1838, p. 199 (Family Squalidae. Type genus: Mustelus Cuvier, 
1817, equals Mustelus Linck, 1790.). Preoccupied in Mammalia by families Mustelini 
Fischer, 1817 and Mustelidae Swainson, 1835 (Type genus: Mustela Linnaeus, 1758) ; 
references for mammalian families in Simpson (1945). 

Family Galei MULLER and HENLE, 1839, p. 57 (Type genus: Galews Cuvier, 1817, a junior 
synonym of Galeorhinus Blainville, 1816; not Galeus Rafinesque, 1809.). 

Family Scylliodontes MULLER and HENTE, 1839, p. 63 (Not based on a type genus.). 

Tribe Triakiana Gray, 1851, p. 39 (Family Squalidae. Type genus: Triakis Miller and Henle, 
1838a.). The family Triakidae was independently proposed by White (1936a, 1936b, 
1937). 

Family Galeorhinoidae Git, 1862b, p. 393 (Type genus: Galeorhinus Blainville, 1816.). 

Family Scylliogaleidae WHITLEY, 1940, p. 68 (Type genus: Scylliogaleus Boulenger, 1902.). 
The family Scylliogaleidae was independently proposed by Smith (1957b). 

Family Emissolidae WHITLEY, 1940, p. 68 (Type genus: Emissola Jarocki, 1822, probably 
a junior synonym of Mustelus Linck, 1790.). 

Family Eugaleidae Gurr, 1962, p. 428 (Type genus: Eugaleus “Rafinesque, 1810”, equals 
Gill, 1864, not Rafinesque, 1809-1810; a junior synonym of Galeorhinus Blainville, 1816.). 


Carcharhinoid sharks with the head not expanded laterally into a wing-like 
blade. Eyes high on sides of head, with their ventral edges above the nostrils. 
Eye length 1.5—2.5 or more times eye height. Nictitating lower eyelid variably 
external, transitional, or internal (Compagno, 1970). Small to moderately 
large spiracles present, with their greatest widths about 3—10 in eye length. La- 
bial furrows long and present on both jaws. Labial cartilages well developed. 

Tooth-row groups poorly differentiated or absent, with medials often present 
but no symphysials, anteriors, or well defined posteriors. Posterior teeth not 
comb-like. Gynandric heterodonty absent or poorly developed as far as is known 
(data not available for Scylliogaleus, Gogolia, and Allomycter). Tooth-row 
counts 18—94/27-94. Teeth with strong basal ledges and grooves. 

Precaudal pits absent. Pectoral fin skeleton with its radials projecting half 
of pectoral anterior margin length or less into fin (fig. 5A). Distal pectoral 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 391 


radials with parallel edges and truncate or distally rounded tips. Longest distal 
radials 1-2 times as long as longest proximal radials. 

First dorsal fin with distinct apex and separate anterior and posterior mar- 
gins, not arcuate-edged and keel-like. First dorsal base anterior to pelvic bases. 
Length of first dorsal base usually much shorter than dorsal caudal margin, but 
subequal to it in Gogolia. No undulations in dorsal caudal margin. 

Neurocranium with bases of lateral rostral cartilages well separated. Nasal 
capsules not greatly depressed or transversely expanded (fig. 6). Large nasal 
fontanelles present and broadly continuous anteriorly with the nasal apertures 
(fig. 6B: NA and NF). Nasal openings of orbitonasal canals inside the nasal 
cavities, located at the posterior edges of the nasal fontanelles or behind them. 
Ectethmoid condyles, when present, without foramina for the anterior facial 
veins (ectethmoid foramina). Internasal septum a high, compressed plate. Ar- 
terial foramina on the basal plate usually include two pairs of stapedial and in- 
ternal carotid foramina (fig. 6B: FS and FC), but Furgaleus has a single pair 
of common foramina apparently formed by the merging of the stapedials and 
internal carotids on each side. Parietal fossa single. Supraorbital crest present 
ies 6205SC). 

Wedge-like intermedialia strongly developed in vertebral centra of adults 
and subadults (fig. 5E) but often absent or poorly developed in fetuses or new- 
born specimens (fig. 5D). 

Valvular intestine with a spiral valve of 5-11 turns. Levator palatoquadrati 
muscles small, with their origins not expanded anterior to the postorbital pro- 
cesses (fig. 7C: MLP). 

Triakidae is distinguished from the families Scyliorhinidae, Pseudo- 
triakidae, and Sphyrnidae of Bigelow and Schroeder (1948) by many charac- 
ters that need not be detailed here. The Proscylliidae as delimited above differ 
from the Triakidae in having rudimentary nictitating lower eyelids; very short 
labial furrows (sometimes absent in Eridacnis); comb-like posterior teeth; 
transverse grooves absent from teeth; distal pectoral radials much shorter than 
the proximal radials; and wedge-like intermedialia absent from the vertebral 
centra. The Leptochariidae differ from the Triakidae in having teeth without 
transverse grooves; strongly developed gynandric heterodonty; nasal openings 
of the orbitonasal canals not in the nasal cavities but posterior to them and pene- 
trating the suborbital shelves; no supraorbital crest; and 14—-16 turns in the 
spiral intestinal valve. 

The family Carcharhinidae is restricted to the ‘advanced carcharhinids”’ 
of Compagno (1970) and includes Carcharhinus Blainville, 1816; Scoliodon 
Miller and Henle, 1837; Galeocerdo Miiller and Henle, 1837; Triaenodon Miil- 
ler and Henle, 1837; Loxodon Miiller and Henle, 1838a; Hypoprion Miiller and 
Henle, 1839; Prionace Cantor, 1849; Aprionodon Gill, 1862a; Jsogomphodon 


392 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Gill, 1862b; Lamiopsis Gill, 1862b; Rhizoprionodon Whitley, 1929; and 
Negaprion Whitley, 1940. The “intermediate carcharhinids” of Compagno 
(1970) are sufficiently distinct from the Carcharhinidae to rate a family, Hemi- 
galeidae (family Hemigalei or Hemigaleus of Hasse, 1879), that includes the 
genera Hemipristis Agassiz, 1843; Hemigaleus Bleeker, 1852 (including Nego- 
galeus Whitley, 1931); Dirrhizodon Klunzinger, 1871 (including Heterogaleus 
Gohar and Mazhar, 1964); Chaenogaleus Gill, 1862b; and Paragaleus Budker, 
1935. Dirrhizodon is usually synonymized with the fossil Hemipristis but is 
separable by differences in tooth histology (Compagno, 1973b). 

The Carcharhinidae and Hemigaleidae differ from the Triakidae in having 
stronger monognathic heterodonty; precaudal pits present; pectoral fin skeleton 
extending into the distal parts of the fins; distal pectoral radials with pointed 
tips and tapering edges; longest distal radials over 3 times the length of the 
longest proximal radials; lateral undulations present in the dorsal caudal margin 
(irregular in Scoliodon and in some specimens of Triaenodon) ; nasal fontanelles 
either separated from the nasal apertures by a cartilaginous bridge (hemigaleids, 
Galeocerdo and Loxodon) or absent; no supraorbital crest; and levator palato- 
quadrati muscles greatly expanded anteriorly, with their origins extending in 
front of the postorbital processes and onto the sides and dorsal surface of the 
cranial roof (Moss, 1972, and unpublished data). The Hemigaleidae addition- 
ally differ from the Triakidae in having two pairs of foramina for the lateral aor- 
tae and efferent hyoidian arteries on the basal plate. Carcharhinids differ from 
triakids also in having weak or no basal ledges on their teeth; ectethmoid foram- 
ina present on the ectethmoid condyles; and scroll intestinal valves. 


COMPARISON WITH OTHER GENERA 


Gogolia is separable from all other triakids by its unusually high ratio of 
preoral length to mouth width (this is below 1.5 in other genera); very short 
mouth (approached in this only by Furgaleus) ; very small gill openings; hetero- 
donty pattern in adult (fig. 4); extreme anterior position of its first dorsal or- 
igin (ago is similar in this but other genera have the first dorsal origin posterior 
to the pectoral insertions) ; very long and low first dorsal fin (other genera have 
the first dorsal base 7% of the dorsal caudal margin or less and the fin height 
over half of the base length); and high total vertebral counts (Tviakis acuti- 
pinna has 175-176 centra, but other triakids usually have fewer than 160). 

Gogolia is distinguished from other triakids in a key to the genera of Tri- 
akidae provided below. In this key the genera Galeorhinus, Hypogaleus, and 
Hemitriakis are restricted to the species listed in Compagno (1970). Tvriakis 
comprises the species placed in it by Compagno (1973a): T. scyllium Miler 
and Henle, 1839, including Hemigaleus pingi Evermann and Shaw, 1927; T. 
megaloptera (A. Smith, 1849), including Mustelus nigropunctatus J. L. B. 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 393 


Smith, 1952; 7. semifasciata Girard, 1854, including Mustelus felis Ayres, 1854; 
T. maculata Kner and Steindachner, 1866, including Mustelus nigromaculatus 
Evermann and Radcliffe, 1917; and 7. acutipinna Kato, 1968. The poorly 
known genus Allomycter is tentatively placed in the Triakidae and included in 
the key. Allomycter (with a single species, A. dissutus) was described from 
photographs of a unique specimen of shark from Cuba, but this specimen was 
lost before its describer could examine it (Guitart, 1972). 


FAMILY TRIAKIDAE. KEY TO GENERA 


la. Nostrils with broad nasoral grooves. Anterior nasal flaps very large, meeting each other 


at midline of snout and overlapping mouth posteriorly. Scylliogaleus Boulenger, 1902. 
1b. Nostrils without nasoral grooves. Anterior nasal flaps small to absent, when present sepa- 
RALcOmnOmMEea cheOthersand snoOtereaciim ey TM OUbH ses ee De 
2a. Preoral length 1.6-1.7 times mouth width. First dorsal fin with its base length almost 
equal to length of dorsal caudal margin and 2.3—3.2 times the first dorsal height 


ep eE ae momma CeR a SEs pe SE ies op ote Pl Gogolia Compagno, new genus. 
2b. Preoral length less than 1.5 times mouth width. First dorsal with its base length 74 or 
less of the dorsal caudal margin length and about 1.2-1.7 times the first dorsal height — 3. 
3a. Anterior nasal flaps absent. Nasal cavities widely open to the exterior... 
Enna rae ees SP a ee eS Allomycter Guitart, 1972. 
3b. Anterior nasal flaps present. Nasal cavities not widely open to the exterior but communi- 


cating with it through restricted incurrent and excurrent apertures 4. 
4a. Teeth markedly unlike in upper and lower jaws. Anterior nasal flaps formed into slender 
VDA ie SEUSS aa, cag a aE 2 CO ele Ae Furgaleus Whitley, 1951. 
4b. Teeth not markedly unlike in upper and lower jaws. Anterior nasal flaps not barbel- 
like _— Beane SL Sieg at Oe ae ae ee 


5a. Ofgin ‘oft first omar far Forward, over Pheer. pies Se ee es ee 
eS ES a Iago Compagno and Springer, 1971. 
5b. Origin of first dorsal farther back, over inner margins of pectorals or posterior to 
(HES, ne I I a Oe Sa ee meee es 6. 
6a. Second dorsal fin about as large as anal fin, with its height 24 or less of first dorsal 
height and its base about half as long as first dorsal base. Terminal sector of caudal 
about half as long as dorsal caudal margin Galeorhinus Blainville, 1816. 
6b. Second dorsal fin noticeably larger than anal fin, its height 42 to virtually equal to first 
dorsal height and its base 73 to about equal to second dorsal base. Terminal sector of 


cancel looks Ta As) loins As, clayseill Gauto bil Twoehyeabo ie 
7a. Nostrils narrow and far apart, internarial space about 2.5-3.0 times nostril width. Teeth 
formed into compressed cutting blades. Medials ee at symphysis of both jaws 8. 


7b. Nostrils wider and closer together, internarial space about 1.0-2.0 times nostril width. 
Teeth molariform to semibladelike, not greatly compressed. No differentiated medials 
SEE, SYA OU OR PIS a Oa 2 ee ee Se ce Ag BA Oe 9. 
8a. Eyes fusiform in shape and over 2 times as long as high. Mouth broadly arched. Second 
dorsal over 7% of height of first dorsal. Ventral caudal lobe very short. 
ee en A Ne ew a Re esse Hemitriakis Herre, 1923. 
8b. Eyes pear-shaped and less than twice as long as high. Mouth triangular. Second dorsal 
about half as high as first dorsal. Ventral caudal lobe very long. 
we Ne ee Hy pogaleus \)\, iB. smith, 1957. 
9a. Snout bluntly rounded in Bec eniel view, thick and blunt in lateral view. Mouth 


394 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


arcuate in shape, lower jaw with convex edges. Teeth of lower jaw hardly overlapping 
or not extending onto its ventral surface, not enlarged at symphysis or forming a knob 
Be ee a ae ee Triakis Miller and Henle, 1838. 
9b. Snout bluntly parabolic to subtriangular in dorsoventral view, bluntly to narrowly 
pointed in lateral view. Mouth subtriangular or triangular in shape, lower jaw with 
straight or nearly straight edges. Teeth of lower jaw prominently overlapping onto its 
ventral surface, more or less enlarged at symphysis to form a knob resembling those of 
FaySuok thessenus) cy 77CioO Oise Mustelus Linck, 1790. 


Gogolia is closest to Galeorhinus, Hypogaleus, and Hemitriakis within the 
Triakidae and is intermediate in some characters between Hemitriakis and the 
other genera. Thus Gogolia resembles Hemitriakis in having strong subocular 
ridges, external nictitating lower eyelids, shallow subocular pouches, and poorly 
developed lateral cusps on the trunk denticles, but agrees with Galeorhinus and 
Hypogaleus in eye shape, greatly reduced anterior nasal flaps and protruding 
mesonarial flaps, and size disparity between first and second dorsal fins. The 
premedial cusplets on the upper parasymphysial teeth of Gogolia recall similar 
cusplets on upper and lower anteroposteriors of the Eocene fossil ““Galeus recti- 
conus” (as described and illustrated by Leriche, 1905). However, the teeth of 
“G. recticonus” have heavier cusps, larger and more regular premedial cusplets, 
less compressed crowns and roots, and stronger transverse notches than in those 
of Gogolia. Living Galeorhinus species also have a few irregular premedial cus- 
plets on anteroposteriors closest to the symphysis, but these are less prominent 
than the premedial cusplets of Gogolia and “G. recticonus.” 


Gogolia filewoodi Compagno, new species. 


Hototype. A pregnant adult female, 739 mm. total length, with 2 fetuses 
(1 retained by Mr. L. W. Filewood), Australian Museum (Sydney) no. I. 
16858—001. The remaining fetus, a 224 mm. male, is cataloged as CAS—27588. 

TyprE LocaLity. Astrolabe Bay, Northern New Guinea, about 1 mile north 
of the Gogol River mouth at 40 fathoms depth; about 5° 18’ S. Latitude and 
145° 50’ E. Longitude. 

SPECIES NAME. Named for Mr. L. W. Filewood in recognition of his work 
on the poorly known elasmobranch fauna of New Guinea. 

MEASUREMENTS AND PROPORTIONS. These are given as percentages of total 
length for the adult female holotype and the male fetus (table 1). 

DESCRIPTION (based on the adult female and fetal male). Head broad, 
width at spiracles about half head length. Head moderately depressed and trape- 


> 


Ficure 4. Gogolia filewoodi. Set of detached teeth from left jaw half of 739 mm. holo- 
type in labial view, with anteroposterior teeth numbered sequentially from medial row at 
symphysis (M) to last row at end of dental band. A, upper teeth. B, lower teeth. 


; og eam =r re mee ome ma) 
| SS ae 
: 8 Siow ; . 
Sr SDEDERSDSDOLIERIOID 


396 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


TasLe 1. Measurements of two specimens of Gogolia filewoodi. 


Measurement Adult female % Male fetus % 
Total length: 739 mm. — 224 mm. — 
Tip of snout to: 
Nostrils. 45 6.1 15 6.7 
Upper symphysis. 72 9.8 25 tee? 
Eyes. 57 Tell 20 8.9 
Spiracles. 94 WAT 33 14.7 
Ist gill openings. 133 18.0 46 20.6 
5th gill openings. 158 25 53 DB 
Pectoral origins. 152 20.1 51 22.8 
1st dorsal origin. 173 23.4 62 Died 
2nd dorsal origin. 434 Sail 138 61.6 
Pelvic origins. 336 45.5 106 47.3 
Anal origin. 445 60.2 140 62.5 
Upper caudal origin. 560 75.8 172 76.8 
Vent. 353 47.8 106 47.4 
Distance between: 
Vent and caudal tip. 386 52.2 118 52.6 
1st and 2nd dorsal bases. 119 16.1 35 15.6 
Pectoral and pelvic bases. 162 21.9 44 19.7 
Pelvic and anal bases. 81 11.0 28 1225 
2nd dorsal base and upper caudal origin. 58 7.9 14 6.3 
Anal base and lower caudal origin. 58 7.9 14 6.3 
2nd dorsal and anal origins. 17 2:3 3 3} 
2nd dorsal and anal insertions. 11 125 2 0.9 
Eyes: 
Length. 26 3.5 13 5.8 
Height. 13 1.8 6 27 
Transverse distance between anterior corners. 52 7.0 20 8.9 
Nostrils: 
Width. 16 De 6 2.7 
Internarial space. 33 45 12 5.6 
Spiracles: 
Diameter. 4 0.5 2 0.9 
Mouth: 
Length. 14 1.9 6 Dil 
Width. 42 il 15 6.7 
Labial furrows: 
Length upper furrows. 17 2.3 6 
Length lower furrows. 9 1.2 3 1.3 
Gill opening widths: 
Ist. wl 1S 3 3 
2nd. 12 1.6 3 1.3 
3rd. 12 1.6 DS) wei! 
4th. 10 1.4 2 0.9 
5th. 8 ail 115) 0.7 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 397 


TaABLe 1. Continued. 


Measurement Adult female %o Male fetus % 

Head: 

Width at anterior corners of eyes. 66 8.9 25 11.2 

Height at anterior corners of eyes. 35 4.7 11 4.9 
Trunk: 

Width at pectoral insertions. 68 9.2 18 8.0 

Height at pectoral insertions. 78 10.6 20 8.9 
Caudal peduncle: 

Width at 2nd dorsal insertion. 24 Bee 6 DSi 

Height at 2nd dorsal insertion. 26 3.5 7 Sail 
Pectoral fins: 

Length anterior margins. 118 16.0 31 13.8 

Length posterior margins. 84 11.4 18 8.0 

Length bases. 44 6.0 13 5.8 

Distance from origin to free rear tip. 81 11.0 24 10.7 

Length inner margins. 45 6.1 14 6.3 
Claspers: 

Length outer margins. — — 3 FS 
Pelvic fins: 

Length anterior margins. 46 6.2 13 5.8 

Length bases. 43 5.8 10 4.5 

Distance from origin to free rear tip. 59 8.0 17 6.7 

Height. 33 4.5 7 3.1 

Length inner margins. 30 4.1 8 3.6 
1st dorsal fin: 

Length anterior margin. 121 16.4 32 14.3 

Length base. 157 Dis 49 21.9 

Height. 67 9.1 15 6.7 

Length inner margin. 32 4.3 8 3.6 
2nd dorsal fin: 

Length anterior margin. 76 10.3 22 9.8 

Length base. 72 9.7 20 8.9 

Height. 46 6.2 11 4.9 

Length inner margin. 23 Sail 6 Dei 
Anal fin: 

Length anterior margin. 51 6.9 13 5.8 

Length base. 50 6.8 10 4.5 

Height. Dil Sail 6 Deh 

Length inner margin. 19 2.6 6 2 
Caudal fin: 

Length dorsal margin. 167 22.6 51 20.9 

Length preventral margin. 57 ed 18 8.0 

Length lower postventral margin. 21 2.8 5 DD) 

Length upper postventral margin. 77 10.4 21 9.4 

Length subterminal margin. 32 4.3 11 4.9 

Length terminal margin. 58 7.9 10 4.5 


Length terminal sector. 64 8.7 16 He 


398 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRroc. 4TH SER. 


zoidal in transverse section at eyes. Outline of head in lateral view slightly con- 
vex ventrally and undulated dorsally, with a slight concavity in front of eyes 
and a convexity above them (figs. 1, 2F). Head outline with prominent notches 
just anterior to nostrils when viewed dorsoventrally (fig. 2D—E). Dorsal sur- 
face of suborbital ridges with depressions over the nostrils and in front of eyes. 
Eyes dorsolaterally situated on head, without eye notches. Ends of nictitating 
lower eyelid attached to upper eyelid (fig. 2A). Secondary lower eyelid sharp- 
edged and extending below the entire length of the eye. Kinetics and morphol- 
ogy of the nictitating lower eyelids, secondary lower eyelids, subocular pouches, 
and levator nictitans muscles (see below) indicate that Gogolia may not be able 
to completely close its eyes with its nictitating lower eyelids. Spiracles large, 
oval, and about % as long as eyes. Spiracles positioned posterior to eyes by 
about their own lengths and about opposite the nictitating lower eyelids. No 
papillose gill rakers on gill arches. Small lobes or mesonarial flaps (fig. 2B: 
MNF) present on the bases of the anterior nasal flaps above their tips and pro- 
truding from the nasal apertures (as in Galeorhinus). Low posterior nasal flaps 
present (fig. 2B: PNF). Mouth width about % of width of head at mouth 
corners. No large buccal papillae in mouth. Upper labial furrows about twice 
as long as lower ones, with their anterior ends slightly in front of eye pupils. 

Teeth showing strong gradient monognathic heterodonty in anteroposterior 
teeth of both jaws of adult. Teeth become proportionately longer, lower, smaller, 
and more oblique-cusped towards the ends of the dental bands (fig. 4). Post- 
lateral cusplets are reduced and replaced by postlateral blades in this direction 
in both jaws, while premedial cusplets are replaced by undifferentiated premedial 
edges in the upper jaw. Ontogenic heterodonty apparently similar to that of 
Hemitriakis (Compagno, 1970), with the fetus lacking cusplets and having post- 
lateral blades only on all of its anteroposterior teeth. Teeth not forming a pave- 
ment and hardly protruding when mouth is closed. 

Body moderately slender, with trunk high and subtriangular in section at 
first dorsal base in adult but lower in fetus. Caudal peduncle short and nearly 
oval in section, not greatly compressed and without lateral dermal keels. No 
predorsal or postdorsal ridges present. Lateral trunk denticles with strong me- 
dial cusps and a pair of medial ridges in fetus and adult, but with lateral ridges 
also present in adult (fig. 3A-B). Denticle crowns have reticulated depressions 
on their dorsal surfaces, much as in Jago (Compagno and Springer, 1971, fig. 6) 
and many other carcharhinoids. 

Pectoral fins broad and subangular, with slightly convex anterior margins, 
narrowly rounded apices, slightly concave posterior margins, and broadly 
rounded free rear tips and inner margins. Pectorals slightly smaller than first 
dorsal. Origins of pectorals about under 3rd gill openings. Apex of pectoral 
posterior to its free rear tip when fin is elevated and appressed to body. 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 399 


5mm. 


el 


Ficure 5. Gogolia filewoodi. A, pectoral fin skeleton of 739 mm. holotype, traced from 
radiograph (details of the axial segments of the metapterygium could not be distinguished), 
with outline of pectoral fin indicated in black. B, dissection of pectoral fin skeleton from 
224 mm. fetus. C, hyobranchial skeleton (excluding hyobranchial rays and extravisceral 
cartilages) from 224 mm. fetus. D-E, transverse sections of MP vertebral centra from below 
first dorsal fin base, with sections cut through the apices of the calcified double cones of each 
centrum; calcified structures are in heavy black and cartilage stippled. D, centrum from 224 
mm. fetus. E, centrum from 739 mm. holotype. Abbreviations: BBC, basibranchial copula ; 
BH, basihyoid; CB 1-5, ist to 5th ceratobranchials; CDC, calcified double cone; CH, cera- 
tohyal; DCL, diagonal calcified lamella; DRA, distal radial segments; EB 1-4, Ist to 4th 
epibranchials; HB 2-4, 2nd to 4th hypobranchials (1st absent); HMD, hyomandibula; IN, 
intermedialia; IRA, intermediate radial segments; MS, mesopterygium; MT, basal segment 
of metapterygium (lightly calcified in fetus) ; MTH, basal segment of metapterygium (heav- 
ily hypercalcified and irregular in shape in adult); MTS, distal segments of metapterygium 
(metapterygial axis); NAR, neural arch; NCA, neural canal; NO, notochordal canal; P, 
propterygium; PB 1-4 +, 1st to 4th pharyngobranchials (4th one probably a compound 
element) ; PRA, proximal radial segments. 


400 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


KS 


ONF 
ECN 


Ficure 6. Gogolia filewoodi. Neurocranium dissected from 224 mm. fetus, in dorsal 
(A), ventral (B), and lateral (C) views. Abbreviations: AF, anterior fontanelle; AFV, 
position of anterior facial vein in nasal fontanelle; ASC, anterior semicircular canal; BP, 
basal plate; ECN, ectethmoid condyle; F IJ, optic nerve foramen; F III, oculomotor nerve 
foramen; F IV, trochlear nerve foramen; F IX, glossopharyngeal nerve foramen; F X, vagus 
nerve foramen; FC, foramen for internal carotid artery; FCV, foramen for anterior cerebral 
vein; FEN, foramen for endolymphatic duct; FES, foramen for efferent spiracular artery; 
FM, foramen magnum; FOC, orbitocerebral foramen for superficial ophthalmic nerve; FOE 
and FOI, preorbital and orbital foramina for supraorbital canal through supraorbital crest, 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 401 


Pectoral fin skeleton with 1 radial on propterygium, 4-5 on mesopterygium, 
and about 15-16 on metapterygium (including segmented axis of metapteryg- 
ium). Radials mainly divided into 3 segments: proximal, intermediate, and 
distal. Metapterygium (exclusive of segmented axis) densely hypercalcified 
and irregularly expanded in adult but not in fetus (fig. 5A—-B). 

Pelvic fins triangular, short, and about as large as anal fin. Pelvic anterior 
margins slightly convex, apices subacute, posterior margins straight, free rear 
tips pointed, and inner margins nearly straight. Inner margins, free rear tips, 
and posterior margins of pelvics forming a broad triangle. 

First dorsal broadly triangular, with convex to undulated anterior margin, 
narrowly rounded apex, concave posterior margin, acute and attenuate free rear 
tip, and concave inner margin. Midpoint of first dorsal base varying from about 
equidistant between pectoral and pelvic bases (fetus) to about 1.6 times farther 
from pelvic bases than pectorals (adult). First dorsal insertion slightly anterior 
to pelvic origins by a distance somewhat less than the lengths of the pelvic bases. 
First dorsal insertion far posterior to apex of first dorsal. 

Second dorsal much narrower-based and more acutely triangular than first 
dorsal, with undulating anterior margin, broadly rounded apex, moderately con- 
cave posterior margin, acutely pointed and attenuate free rear tip, and concave 
inner margin. Second dorsal origin anterior to anal origin by a distance less than 
% of second dorsal base length. 

Anal fin a low triangle, with undulated to slightly convex anterior margin, 
round apex, shallowly concave posterior margin, acute free rear tip, and nearly 
straight posterior margin. 

Dorsal caudal margin convex to undulated, without a crest of enlarged den- 
ticles. Preventral margin slightly convex, tip of ventral lobe narrowly rounded, 
upper and lower postventral margins and subterminal margin nearly straight, 
and terminal margin slightly concave. Subterminal margin about 0.6—1.1 times 


= 


containing superficial ophthalmic nerve; FPC, orbitocerebral foramen for deep ophthalmic 
nerve; FPE and FPI, preorbital and orbital foramina for canal transmitting deep ophthalmic 
nerve through supraorbital crest; FPN, fenestra for the perilymphatic canal; FS, foramen for 
the stapedial or orbital artery; HF, hyomandibular facet; IOC, interorbital canal; LR, 
lateral rostral cartilage; MR, medial rostral cartilage; NA, nasal aperture; NF, nasal fon- 
tanelle; NP, orbital notch; O, orbit; OC, occipital condyle; OCN, occipital centrum; ONF, 
orbital foramen for orbitonasal canal (nasal foramen or ectethmoid chamber for the canal 
is inside nasal capsule) ; OR, opisthotic ridge; ORF, orbital fissure; OT, otic capsule; PR, 
preorbital process; PRF, parietal fossa; PSC, posterior semicircular canal; PT, postorbital 
process; RF, rostral fenestra; RN, rostral node; RRF, ridge between base of lateral rostral 
cartilage and edge of anterior fontanelle; SC, supraorbital crest; SEF, subethmoid fossa; SR, 
sphenopterotic ridge; SS, suborbital shelf. 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


402 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 403 


terminal margin, relatively shorter in adult than fetus. Vertebral axis of caudal 
noticeably raised. 

Total vertebral counts 180 (2). Counts of monospondylous precaudal (MP) 
centra 27.2 percent, counts of diplospondylous precaudal (DP) centra 35.0-36.7 
percent, and counts of diplospondylous caudal (DC) centra 35.0-36.7 percent 
of total counts. Ratios of DP/MP counts 1.3-1.4, DC/MP counts 1.3—-1.4, A 
ratios (length of penultimate MP centrum/length of first DP centrum x 100) 
150-160, and B ratios (length/width of penultimate MP centrum x 100) 67— 
68 (methods of counting and ratios follow Springer and Garrick, 1964, and 
Compagno, 1970). Transition between MP and DP centra over region of pelvic 
fin bases. Last few MP centra before MP—DP transition not greatly enlarged. 

Vertebral calcification patterns studied from transverse sections of MP cen- 
tra below first dorsal base (terminology from Ridewood, 1921). Diagonal cal- 
cified lamellae very long in adult but short in fetus. Dorsal, ventral, and lateral 
intermedialia are present in the adult but not in the fetus (fig. 5D-E). Noto- 
chordal canal very small at apices of calcified double cones in adult (unlike 
adults of Jago) but large in fetus. 

Neurocranium was dissected in the fetus (fig. 6) and studied by stereo- 
radiographs in the adult. Cranial terminology is modified from Gegenbaur 
(1872), Allis (1923), Holmgren (1941), Gilbert (1967), and Compagno (1973a 
and b). The cranium of G. filewoodi is most similar to those of Hemitriakis, 
Galeorhinus, and Hypogaleus, and less like those of other triakids (the neuro- 
cranium was dissected and examined by the writer from all triakid genera except 
Allomycter). Rostral cartilages slender and not hypercalcified in adult, fused 
at their tips to form a fenestrate rostral node. Nasal capsules slightly wider than 
long, greatest transverse width across them 1.1—1.3 in nasobasal length. Anterior 
fontanelle horizontally oval, with its width about 3.4-3.7 in nasobasal length. 


Ficure 7. Gogolia filewoodi. Head of 224 mm. fetus in dorsal (A), ventral (B), and 
lateral (C) views, dissected to show relation of neurocranium to jaws, jaw and hyoid muscles, 
and cranial nerve roots. Head outline in black. Abbreviations: AF, anterior fontanelle; 
EM, epibranchial myomeres; HMD, hyomandibula (distal end); LC, labial cartilages; LCP, 
cushioning ligament between ectethmoid condyle and orbital process of palatoquadrate; LR, 
lateral rostral cartilage; MAM, adductor mandibulae muscle; MC, Meckel’s cartilage; MCM, 
coracomandibular muscle; MIH, interhyoid muscle; MIM, intermandibular muscle; MLH, 
levator hyomandibuli muscle; MLP, levator palatoquadrati muscle; MLS, levator labii supe- 
rioris or preorbitalis muscle; MR, medial rostral cartilage; N II, optic nerve; N III, oculo- 
motor nerve; NA, nasal aperture; NB VII, buccal ramus of facial nerve; NC, nasal capsule; 
NH VII, hyomandibular ramus of facial nerve; NM V, mandibular ramus of trigeminal 
nerve; NMX V, maxillary ramus of trigeminal nerve; NP V, deep ophthalmic ramus of tri- 
geminal nerve; NS V + VII, supraorbital trunk or superficial ophthalmic ramus of trigemi- 
nal and facial nerves; OPQ, orbital process of palatoquadrate; PQ, palatoquadrate; PT, 
postorbital process; SC, supraorbital crest; SP, spiracle; SS, suborbital shelf. 


404 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Dorsal lip of fontanelle not anteriorly flared and without an epiphysial foramen. 
Cranial roof broadly arched between orbits. Orbital notches very prominent (fig. 
6B: NP). No keels on basal plate. Internal carotid foramina closer to each 
other than to the stapedial foramina. Edge of supraorbital crests arcuate in 
dorsal view. Orbit oval in lateral view, with contents indicated in fig. 6C. No 
ledges between nasal capsules and suborbital shelves. Otic capsules not greatly 
expanded or inflated, their lengths about 3.3 in nasobasal length and the great- 
est transverse width across them about 1.9 in nasobasal length. Hyomandibular 
facets small and horizontally elongate. Occipital condyles short, with a single 
occipital centrum between them (fig. 6B—C: OC and OCN). 

The hyobranchial skeleton was studied in the fetus by dissecting it out, 
staining it with methylene blue by Van Wijhe’s method (Gray, 1954), and 
clearing it with the tricresyl phosphate-tributyl phosphate clearing solution of 
Groat (1941). It resembles comparable structures in other carcharhinoids ex- 
amined (Leptocharias and Scoliodon) but has an unusually large and broad 
basihyoid and basibranchial copula (fig. 5C: BH and BBC). The hyomandibu- 
lae are short and moderately stout, the ceratohyals long and stout, and 3 pairs 
of hypobranchials (apparently nos. 2—4) are present. 

Jaws and musculature associated with them are relatively weak (terminology 
for muscles follows Lightoller, 1939). Palatoquadrates and Meckel’s cartilages 
flat and weak, with low orbital processes on palatoquadrates. The orbital pro- 
cesses articulate with the ectethmoid condyles on the nasal capsules and are 
attached to them by cushioning ligaments (fig. 7B—C: LCP and OPQ). Leva- 
tor labii superioris or preorbitalis muscles small and single-headed, their origins 
on the sides of the nasal capsules lateral to the ectethmoid condyles and their 
insertions on the adductor mandibulae muscles near the mouth angles. Levator 
palatoquadrati muscles very slender, originating at the bases of the postorbital 
processes and inserting on the posterodorsolateral ends of the palatoquadrates. 
Levator hyomandibuli muscles very slender, originating on the sides of the otic 
capsules below the sphenopterotic ridges and inserting on the dorsolateral ends 
of the hyomandibulae. Levator nictitans short and poorly differentiated (not 
shown in fig. 7). Coracomandibular (fig. 7B: MCM), coracohyoid, and cora- 
cobranchial muscles very large, but branchial constrictors could not be found in 
the specimen examined. 

Stomach divided into a moderately large fundus and a long, slender pylorus. 
The fundus extends posteriorly about half the length of the pleuroperitoneal 
cavity then reverses direction as the pylorus nearly to the base of the liver, where 
it connects with the valvular intestine. The intestine (fig. 2C) has 7 turns in 
its spiral valve. The rectum has a bulbous rectal gland attached to it by a stalk. 
Liver moderately large, irregularly bilobate, and extending posteriorly over 
*, of the length of the pleuroperitoneal cavity. Liver not obscuring other vis- 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 405 


cera entirely in ventral view. Spleen elongate and not nodular, with an irregu- 
larly thickened part opposite the end of the fundus and a slender anterior part 
extending along the pylorus. Pancreas small, located at junction of spiral in- 
testine and pylorus. Ovary present on right side only, with follicles up to 6 mm. 
in diameter present. Both oviducts are developed, each having a moderately 
large nidimental gland. 

Development ovoviviparous. The 2 fetuses (probably full-term or nearly so) 
were carried one to an oviduct and lacked placental connections to the mother. 

Color of adult dark gray tinged with brown on dorsum, fins, and underside 
of head, light gray or gray-cream on abdomen and flanks. Dorsal fin edges dusky 
or blackish and posterior margin of pectorals light. Fetus is gray-brown above, 
lighter below, and dusky finned. 


SUMMARY 


Gogolia filewoodi, new genus and species, is described from two specimens 
of triakid shark from northern New Guinea. The genus differs from other tri- 
akids in having an unusually high ratio of preoral length to mouth width, very 
short mouth, small gill openings, extremely long first dorsal base, and high ver- 
tebral counts. The family Triakidae is resurrected, redefined, and limited to 
the genera Mustelus, Galeorhinus, Triakis, Scylliogaleus, Hemitriakis, Fur- 
galeus, Hypogaleus, Iago, Allomycter, and Gogolia. The family Carcharhinidae 
is confined to the genera Carcharhinus, Scoliodon, Galeocerdo, Triaenodon, 
Loxodon, Hypoprion, Prionace, Aprionodon, Isogomphodon, Lamiopsis, Rhizo- 
prionodon, and Negaprion. Hemipristis, Hemigaleus, Dirrhizodon, Chaeno- 
galeus, and Paragaleus are referred to the family Hemigaleidae, Leptocharias 
tentatively to its own family, Leptochariidae, and the ‘scyliorhiniform triakoid’ 
genera Proscyllium, Eridacnis, Ctenacis, and Gollum to the family Proscylliidae. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


I would especially like to thank L. W. Filewood (Department of Agriculture, 
Stock and Fisheries, Konedobu, Papua-New Guinea) for making it possible for 
me to describe his unique new shark. The following individuals were very help- 
ful in providing specimens, information, and facilities used in this study: Phillip 
C. Heemstra (Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia); John R. Paxton 
(Australian Museum, Sydney); W. I. Follett, William N. Eschmeyer, George 
S. Myers, Warren C. Freihofer, and Lillian J. Dempster (Department of Ichthy- 
ology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco); C. G. Alexander (Cali- 
fornia State University at San Francisco); Shelton P. Applegate (Division of 
Vertebrate Palaeontology, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History) ; 
J. M. Moreland (Dominion Museum, Wellington, New Zealand); Stewart 
Springer (Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida); Tyson R. Roberts and 
Myvanwy M. Dick (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University) ; 


406 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Susumu Kato (National Marine Fisheries Service, Tiburon Fisheries Laboratory, 
Tiburon, California); John Bass and John Wallace (Oceanographic Research 
Institute, Durban, South Africa); the late J. L. B. Smith (Rhodes University, 
Grahamstown, South Africa); Carl L. Hubbs, Richard H. Rosenblatt, and 
Leighton R. Taylor, Jr. (Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, Cali- 
fornia); Leslie W. Knapp (Smithsonian Oceanographic Sorting Center, Wash- 
ington, D. C.); Robert P. Dempster (Steinhart Aquarium, California Academy 
of Sciences); Victor G. Springer and Stanley H. Weitzman (Division of Fishes, 
U. S. National Museum, Washington, D. C.); Reeve M. Bailey (University 
of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor); J. A. F. Garrick (Victoria Uni- 
versity, Wellington, New Zealand); and R. J. McKay (Western Australian 
Museum, Perth, Australia). Through the invaluable aid of these people I was 
able to examine and dissect representatives of all genera of the families Proscyl- 
liidae, Leptochariidae, Triakidae (except Allomycter), Hemigaleidae, and Car- 
charhinidae and compare them with one another and with Gogolia. 


LITERATURE CITED 


AGAssiz, Louis 
1833-1843. Recherches sur les poissons fossiles. Vol. 3 (text), Contenant I’Histoire de 
Ordre des Placoides, pp. i-vii, 1-390, 1-32. Vol. 3 (atlas), Contenant 83 plan- 
ches de l’Ordre des Placoides, pls. 1-83. Neuchatel, Switzerland. 
ALLIS, EpwARD PHELPS, JR. 
1923. The cranial anatomy of Chlamydoselachus anguineus. Acta Zoologica, vol. 4, 
pp. 123-221, pls. 1-23. 
Ayres, WILLIAM O. 
1854. (descriptions of new fishes: Osmerus elongatus and Mustelus felis). Proceedings 
of the California Academy of Natural Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 17-18. 
BicELow, Henry B., and WiLL1AM C. SCHROEDER 
1948. Sharks. Fishes of the western North Atlantic. Memoir 1, Sears Foundation for 
Marine Research, part 1, vol. 1, pp. 59-576, figs. 6-106. 
BLAINVILLE, HENRI M. D. 
1816. Prodrome d’une distribution systematique du regne animal. Bulletin des Sciences, 
par la Société Philomatique de Paris, vol. 8, pp. 105-124. 
BLEEKER, PIETER 
1852. Bijdrage tot de kennis der Plagiostomen van den Indischen Archipel. Verhande- 
lingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen, vol. 
24, pp. 1-92, 4 pls. 
BonaAPARTE, CHartes L. J. L. 
1838. Selachorum tabula analytica. Nuovi annali delle scienze naturali, ser. 1, vol. 2, 
pp. 195-214. 
BouLENGER, GEORGE A. 
1902. Description of a new South African galeid selachian. Annals and Magazine of 
Natural History, ser. 7, vol. 10, no. 55, pp. 51-52, pl. 4. 
BUDKER, PAUL 
1935. Description d’un genre nouveau de la famille des Carcharhinides. Bulletin du 
Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, ser. 2, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 107-112, 
fig. 


VoL. XXXIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 407 


CANTOR, THEODORE 

1849. Catalogue of Malayan fishes. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1849, vol. 

18, pp. i-xil, 983-1443, pls. 1-14. 
Compacno, L. J. V. 

1970. Systematics of the genus Hemitriakis (Selachii:Carcharhinidae), and related 
genera. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, fourth series, vol. 
38, no. 4, pp. 63-98, 8 figs. 

1973a. Ctenacis and Gollum, two new genera of sharks (Selachii:Carcharhinidae). Pro- 
ceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, fourth series, vol. 39, no. 14, 
pp. 257-272, 4 figs. 

1973b.In Press. Interrelationships of living elasmobranchs. Jn Interrelationships of 
Fishes, edited by P. H. Greenwood, R. S. Miles, and C. Patterson. Supplement 
no. 11 to the Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London, vol. 53, 
pp. 15-61, 5 figs., 2 pls. 

Compacno, L. J. V., and STEWART SPRINGER 

1971. Jago, a new genus of carcharhinid sharks, with a redescription of J. omanensis. 
Fishery Bulletin, National Marine Fisheries Service, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 615-626, 
6 figs. 

Cuvier, GeorcEs L. C. F. D. 

1817. Le regne animal distribué d’apres son organisation. Tome II. Les Reptiles, les 

Poissons, les Mollusques et les Annelides. Deterville, Paris. Pp. i-xviii, 1-532. 
EVERMANN, Barton W., and Louis RADCLIFFE 

1917. The fishes of the west coast of Peru and the Titicaca Basin. Bulletin of the 

United States National Museum, no. 95, pp. 1-166, 14 pls. 
EVERMANN, Barton W., and TseEn-HwAnc SHAW 

1927. Fishes from eastern China, with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the 

California Academy of Sciences, fourth series, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 97-122. 
FowLer, Henry W. 

1941. Contributions to the biology of the Philippine Archipelago and adjacent regions. 
The fishes of the groups Elasmobranchii, Holocephali, Isospondyli, and Ostario- 
physi obtained by the United States Bureau of Fisheries Steamer ‘Albatross’ 
in 1907 to 1910, chiefly in the Philippine Islands and adjacent seas. Bulletin of 
the United States National Museum, no. 100, vol. 13, pp. i-x, 1-879, 30 figs. 

GARMAN, SAMUEL 

1913. The Plagiostoma. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard 

College, vol. 36, pp. i-xiii, 1-515, 77 pls. 
Garrick, J. A. F., and LEonAarD P. SCHULTZ 

1963. A guide to the kinds of potentially dangerous sharks. /m Sharks and Survival, 
edited by Perry W. Gilbert. D. C. Heath and Company, Boston. Pp. 3-60, 33 
figs. 

GEGENBAUR, CARL 

1872. Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbelthiere. Drittes Heft. 
Das Kopfskelet der Selachier, ein Beitrag zur Erkenntnis der Genese des Kopt- 
skeletes der Wirbelthiere. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. Pp. i-x, 1-316, 22 pls. 

GILBERT, CARTER R. 

1967. A revision of the hammerhead sharks (family Sphyrnidae). Proceedings of the 

United States National Museum, vol. 119, no. 3539, pp. 1-88, 22 figs. 10 pls. 
GILL, THEODORE 
1861. Catalogue of the fishes of the eastern coast of North America from Greenland to 


408 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH Srr. 


Georgia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 
13, Addendum, pp. 1-63. 
1862. Analytical synopsis of the order of Squali; and revision of the nomenclature of 
the genera. Squalorum generum novorum descriptiones diagnosticae. Annals 
of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York, vol. 7, nos. 32-33, pp. 367-413. 
1864. Second contribution to the selachology of California. Proceedings of the Academy 
of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 16, pp. 147-151. 
GrIrRARD, CHARLES 
1854. Characteristics of some cartilaginous fishes of the Pacific coast of North America. 
Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 7, no. 6, 
pp. 196-197. 
Gowar, H. A. F., and F. M. MaAzHar 
1964. The elasmobranchs of the north-western Red Sea. Publications of the Marine 
Biological Station Al-Ghardaqa (Red Sea), no. 13, pp. 1-144, 81 figs., 16 pls., 
2 maps. 
Gray, JOHN EDWARD 
1851. List of the specimens of fish in the collection of the British Museum. Part I. 
Chondropterygiil. British Museum (Natural History), London. Pp. i-x, 1-160, 
2 pis. 
Gray, PETER 
1954. The microtomist’s formulary and guide. Blakiston Company, Inc., New York 
and Toronto. Pp. i-xiii, 1-794, 87 figs. 
Groat, RICHARD A, 
1941. Clearing tissue with mixtures of tributyl and tri-o-cresyl phosphates. Stain Tech- 
nology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 111-117. 
GuitarT, Dario J. 
1972. Un nuevo genero y especie de tiburon de la familia Triakidae. Poeyana, no. 99, 
pp. 1-4, 1 fig. 
Gurr, Pui R. 
1962. A new fish fauna from the Woolwich Bottom Bed (Sparnacian) of Herne Bay, 
Kent. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association (London), vol. 73, pp. 419- 
447, 9 figs., pls. 17-26. 
Hasse, JOHANN C. F. 
1879. Das natiirliche System der Elasmobranchier auf Grundlage des Baues und der 
Entwicklung ihrer Wirbelsdule. Gustav Fischer, Jena. Allgemeiner Theil, pp. 
i-vi, 1-76, 6 figs., 2 pls., Stammtafel I-II. 
HErRRE, ALBERT W. C. T. 
1923. Notes on Philippine sharks. I. The Philippine Journal of Science, vol. 23, no. 1, 
pp. 68-73, 1 pl. 
HItcENpDorRF, Franz M. 
1904. Ein neuer Scyllium-artiger Haifisch, Proscyllium habereri nov. subgen., n. spec. 
von Formosa. Sitzungs-Berichten der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde, 
1904, no. 2, pp. 39-41. 
Hoimcren, Nits 
1941. Studies on the head in fishes. Embryological, morphological, and phylogenetical 
researches. Part II: Comparative anatomy of the adult selachian skull, with 
remarks on the dorsal fins in sharks. Acta Zoologica, vol. 22, pt. 1, pp. 1-100, 
74 figs. 
Jarocki, FeELix P. 
1822. Zoologiia, vol. 4. Warsaw, Poland (not seen). 


VoL. XXXTIX] COMPAGNO: GOGOLIA FILEWOODI 409 


Kato, SusuMU 

1968. Triakis acutipinna (Galeoidea, Triakidae), a new species of shark from Ecuador. 

Copeia, 1968, no. 2, pp. 319-325, 2 figs. 
Kato, SuSuMU, STEWART SPRINGER, and Mary H. WAGNER 

1967. Field guide to eastern Pacific and Hawaiian sharks. United States Fish and Wild- 

life Service, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Circular 271, pp. 1-47, 75 figs. 
KLUNZINGER, CARL B. 

1871. Synopsis der Fische des Rothen Meeres. II Theil. Verhandlungen, Zoologisch- 

Botanische Gesellschaft, Vienna, vol. 21, pp. 441-688. 
Kner, RupoLr, and Franz STEINDACHNER 

1866. Neue Fishe aus dem Museum der Herrn Joh. C. Godeffroy und Sohn in Ham- 
burg. Sitzungsberichte K6niglich Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna, vol. 
54, pp. 356-395, 18 figs., 5 pls. 

LeERICHE, MAURICE 

1905. Les poissons éocénes de la Belgique. Mémoires du Musée Royal d’Histoire Natur- 

elle de Belgique, ser. 1, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 49-228, figs. 9-64, pls. 4-12. 
LIGHTOLLER, G. H. S. 

1939. Probable homologues. A study of the comparative anatomy of the mandibular 
and hyoid arches and their musculature. Transactions of the Zoological Society 
of London, vol. 24, part 5, no. 1, pp. 349-444, 9 pls. 

Linck, HEtnricH F. 

1790. Versuch einer Eintheilung der Fische nach den Zahnen. Magazin fiir das Neueste 

aus der Physik und Naturgeschichte, Gotha, vol. 6, part 3, pp. 28-38. 
Moss, SANForp A. 

1972. The feeding mechanism of sharks of the family Carcharhinidae. Journal of Zo- 
ology, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, vol. 167, pp. 423-436, 
4 figs., 1 pl. 

MULLER, JOHANNES, and F. G. J. HENLE 

1837. (Gattungen der Haifische und Rochen). Bericht der Ko6niglich preussischen 
Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, vol. 2, pp. 111-118. 

1838a. On the generic characters of cartilaginous fishes, with descriptions of new genera. 
The Magazine of Natural History, new series, vol. 2, January, pp. 33-37, Febru- 
ary, pp. 88-91. 

1838b, 1839, 1841. Systematische Beschreibung der Plagiostomen. Berlin. Pp. 1-28, 
1838b.; reset pp. 27-28 and pp. 29-102, 1839; pp. i-xxii, 103-200 and replacing 
sheet E to first part, 1841; 60 pls. 

RAFINESQUE, CONSTANTINE S. 

1809-1810. Caratteri di alcuni nuovi generi e nuove spece di animali e piante della 

Sicilia. Palermo. Pp. 1-69, part 1, 1809; pp. 71-105, part 2, 1810; 20 pls. 
Rwewoop, W. G. 

1921. On the calcification of the vertebral centra in sharks and rays. Philosophical 
Transactions of the Royal Society of London, ser. B., Zoology, vol. 210, pp. 
311-407, 38 figs. 

Smmpson, GEORGE GAYLORD 

1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the 

American Museum of Natural History, vol. 85, pp. i-xvi, 1-350. 
SMITH, ANDREW 

1849. Pisces. Illustrations of the zoology of South Africa, vol. 4. Smith, Elder, and 

Company, London. Pp. 1-77, 31 pls. 


410 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


SmiTtH, HucH M. 
1913. Description of a new carcharioid shark from the Sulu Archipelago. Proceedings 
of the United States National Museum, vol. 45, pp. 599-600, 3 figs., pl. 47. 
SmiTH, J. L. B. 
1952. A new hound shark from South Africa, and new records. Annals and Magazine 
of Natural History, ser. 12, vol. 5, pp. 223-226, pl. 13. 
1957a. A new shark from Zanzibar, with notes on Galeorhinus Blainville. Annals and 
Magazine of Natural History, ser. 12, vol. 10, pp. 585-592, 2 figs., pls. 18-19. 
1957b. A preliminary survey of the scylliogaleid dogfishes of South Africa. South Afri- 
can Journal of Science, vol. 53, no. 14, pp. 353-359, 2 figs. 
SPRINGER, Victor G., and J. A. F. Garrick 
1964. A survey of vertebral numbers in sharks. Proceedings of the United States Na- 
tional Museum, vol. 116, no. 3496, pp. 73-96, 1 pl., 3 tables. 
Waiter, E. GRACE 
1936a.A classification and phylogeny of the elasmobranch fishes. American Museum 
Novitates, no. 837, pp. 1-16. 
1936b. Some transitional elasmobranchs connecting the Catuloidea with the Carchar- 
inoidea. American Museum Novitates, no. 879, pp. 1-22, 10 figs. 
1937. Interrelationships of the elasmobranchs with a key to the order Galea. Bulletin 
of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 74, art. 2, pp. 25-138, 66 
figs., 51 pls. 
WHITLEY, GILBERT P. 
1929. Additions to the check-list of the fishes of New South Wales. No. 2. The Aus- 
tralian Zoologist, vol. 5, pt. 4, pp. 353-357. 
1931. New names for Australian fishes. The Australian Zoologist, vol. 6, pt. 4, pp. 
310-334, pls. 25-27. 
1940. The fishes of Australia. Part I. The sharks, rays, devilfish, and other primitive 
fishes of Australia and New Zealand. Australian Zoological Handbook, Royal 
Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney. Pp. 1-280, 303 figs. 
1951. New fish names and records. Proceedings of the Royal Zoological Society of New 
South Wales (1949-1950), 1951, pp. 61-68, figs. 8-10. 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
3 FOURTH SERIES 


_ Vol. XX XIX, No. 20, pp. 411-500; 72 figs. December 19, 1973 


MUSCULAR ANATOMY OF THE FORE- 
-LIMB OF THE SEA OTTER 


EY LE TE ALS. BS 


eA LUTRIS) 50 Biological Laborat.77 
LIBRARY 
By j 
Dyan 2 1974 


L. D. Howard 4 


| 
Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Pacific Graye, Cali forage, 93950) « SS. 


ghee RCA OCR CUE TAS=1F 


Ph 


a -) F ne ' i ef 
if tas ; 
1 Nb he 

A} ea 

Pee 7 


Tg Kes, . 4° a ; 


Aeris). 
Os ae bie 


PROCEEDINGS 
OF THE ee 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIE 


FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 20, pp. 411-500; 72 figs. December 19, 1973 


MUSCULAR ANATOMY OF THE FORE- 
LIMB OF THE SEA OTTER 
(ENHYDRA LUTRIS) 


By 
L. D. Howard 
Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California 93950 


INTRODUCTION 


The present study was undertaken to make available for future reference 
the detailed muscular anatomy of the forelimb of this remarkable marine mam- 
mal, Enhydra lutris. 

The sea otter has a limited southern range of approximately 140 miles along 
the coast of California from the Monterey Peninsula on the north to Morro Bay 
on the south. It is estimated by aerial and shoreline survey, that 1,000 individ- 
uals make up the population in this area. 

The sea otter rarely comes on shore in this area, preferring the sanctuary of 
the abundant kelp beds for its home. Food preference is exclusively the many 
invertebrates found in this area, such as the various kinds of crabs, shellfish, 
and sea urchins. Since this food is mainly on the ocean floor, the animals dive 
to obtain it but return to the surface to consume it while floating on their backs 
using the chest as a dinner table. Divers, observing otters gathering their food, 
note that it is carried either in a bimanual manner or under one arm in the axil- 
lary area where a fold of skin assists in securing the object. 

On occasions, an animal will bring up a rock and, placing it on its abdomen, 
use it as an anvil against which it can break shellfish. In so doing the animal 
holds the food between its forepaws and rapidly strikes it against the rock. In 
view of this habit, the otter has been classified as a tool user. 

We are concerned, therefore, with the work this animal has to do with the 


[411] 


412 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


forelimbs in an aquatic environment, and the structural anatomy he has with 
which to accomplish these tasks. 

Over the past several years, the author has observed these animals in their 
natural habitat, noting the high degree of specialized use of the forelimbs in 
eating, grooming, and caring for the young. Based on these observations it would 
appear that the ‘hand’ of this animal should be extremely dextrous, yet when 
observed at close range, the anatomical characteristics show marked resemblance 
to the forepaw of mammals which use the forelimb mainly for land propulsion. 

Many references in the literature describe how the otter uses its forelimbs. 
It seemed of interest, therefore, to study the ‘hand’ in some detail from an ana- 
tomical standpoint. To do so necessitated the study of the entire forelimb since 
the hand, to be effective, must be positioned by the forelimb and positional stabil- 
ity maintained when the hand itself is in use. 

The material for this study consisted of one fresh specimen on which the 
range of motion measurements were made, and one preserved specimen used for 
recording the detail of the muscular anatomy. The method used for this latter 
study was to make a series of anatomical dissections, photograph each, and then 
from the projected slides make accurate line drawings. In this way, the relative 
size and relationship of each muscle could be portrayed. 

The forelimb muscles can be grouped in various ways: by their innervation, 
by their action (such as extensors and flexors), by their origin (pre- and post- 
axial), or by where they make their attachments. Examples of the last would 
be muscles connecting the trunk to the limb, muscles connecting the scapula to 
the humerus, etc. 

In this treatise a fixed method of presentation is not used, but rather the 
muscles are described as they are encountered in a dissection going from the 
proximal to the distal areas. Each muscle is numbered and retains this number 
wherever it appears. A gross description of each muscle is given with its origin 
and insertion and a notation as to its action or actions if the muscle were to be 
activated as a single unit. This situation, of course, never happens in the living 
specimen, as each voluntary motion of any part of the limb is a complicated 
interplay between the many muscles, some relaxing, some serving to stabilize 
the joints, and some serving as prime movers for any given motion. 

For further clarification, plates of the forearm skeleton have been added 
and the areas of origin and insertion of muscles designated. 


OBSERVATIONS OF JOINT MOBILITY 


In a fresh specimen, by means of passive motions, some idea of the range 
of motion of the forelimb could be observed and for some joints the range of 
motion could be actually recorded. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 


ro 
me» . 

e . e* 
a 


Ficure 1. An anterior or palmar view of the forefoot to show the disposition of the 
palmar pads. The major crease lines are transverse and quite deep. Distally, shallow incom- 
plete crease lines suggest interdigitation, but such is not the case to any practical degree. 


The pads appear to bulge slightly and are turgid, and the covering skin is thick with a peb- 
bly roughness. 


414 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


[Proc. 4TH Serr. 


VoL. XXXTX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 415 


Ficure 3. In this posterior or dorsal view of the forefoot the hair has been trimmed 
away to show the position of the claws which, in the unflexed hand, are visible only in this 
view. Since the claws are closely associated with, and move only with, the terminal phalanx, 
their position indicates a marked degree of hyperextension of the terminal digital joints. 


As there is no clavicle in this animal, the pectoral girdle, which consists of 
the scapula only, is extremely mobile on the chest wall, being limited only by 
the muscles attaching the girdle to the trunk. Thus, in a transverse plane, the 
pectoral girdle could be moved to near the midline dorsally and ventrally, and 
in the longitudinal plane an equal, if not slightly greater, range of motion was 
present. A good range of motion in the shoulder joint was also present but tech- 


416 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


nically it was not possible to get accurate measurements in degrees of abduction, 
adduction, flexion, extension, and rotation. 

For the elbow, extension was to an angle of 145° and flexion to an angle 
of 40°. 

For the forearm, pronation was to 30° beyond the midposition and supina- 
tion to 45° beyond the midposition. 

The wrist is very mobile. Palmar flexion of the wrist was to an angle of 82° 
beyond the straight line of the forearm, and dorsiflexion to an angle of 40°. 
Good lateral motion of the wrist was also present, radioflexion being to an angle 
of 30° and ulnaflexion to an angle of 50°. 

For digits 2, 3, 4, and 5, the average range of motion of the individual joints 
as measured from the line of the metacarpal was as follows: 


Extension Flexion 
Metacarpal phalangeal joint 80° 45° 
Proximal interphalangeal joint 525 45° 
Distal interphalangeal joint Ih7i0)= 205 
For digit 1: 
Metacarpal phalangeal joint 80° 65° 
Interphalangeal joint 170" 50° 


From the above, it is to be noted that the digital joints have a greater range of 
extension than of flexion, which, in itself, would indicate the sacrificing of a 
gripping mechanism in favor of ambulatory functions. 

This situation was even more evident when traction was made on the digi- 
tal extensors and the flexor tendons in the forearm. 

The digits of the ‘hand’ are not individualized, being held closely together 
by webbing and the first digit, or thumb, is in the same plane as the other digits. 
Without an established thumb web the first digit is unopposable and lateral 
motions of the other digits are of insignificant amount because of the webbing. 
In fact, a better term than “webbing” would be total syndactylism. 

An effort was made to see if objects could be held in the hand by a grasp 
mechanism. When the long flexors were pulled upon strongly in the forearm 
an ordinary pencil, for example, could not be grasped firmly in the hand. Larger 
objects could be held but rather precariously in the absence of an opposable 
thumb. Part of the problem, as far as gripping objects is concerned, appears to 
be due to the large pads on the palmar surface which, on grasp, appear to fill 
the palm. When the digits were flexed to their limits, the terminal digital pads 
failed to touch the palmar pad by about 12 mm. However, there is sufficient 
flexion of the digits to allow the claws to be used against the flat opposing sur- 
face. Since palmar flexion of the wrist is extremely good, large objects of 8 or 
more cm. in diameter could be held between the hand and distal forearm. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 417 


« 


ae 
SHAS 
za 


Ficure 4. This figure is a direct line copy of an x-ray of the hand and wrist after soft 
iron wires were placed in the creases of the palmar pad. This was done to show the relation- 
ship of these crease lines to the underlying joints. The pad itself lies distal to the most proxi- 
mal wire (heavy line). From this it is to be noted that the volar pad covers only the distal 
one-half of the metacarpals plus the phalanges. The main transverse creases are at metacarpal 
phalangeal joint level. Therefore when walking on this pad the otter does not walk on the 
flat of the hand as it appears, but rather on the metatarsal heads and the phalanges. This 
is readily understandable in view of the limited dorsiflexion of the wrist and the great degree 
of hyperextension of the metacarpal phalangeal joints. 


418 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 5. The grasp mechanism of the individual hand is markedly limited as shown in 
this figure. The long flexor tendons of the digits were pulled upon forcibly in an effort to 
demonstrate grasp of a pencil. This precarious grasp depended upon sufficient flexion of the 
finger joints to allow the claw of the fifth digit to become effective. Without a good claw 
(and the claws are frequently worn down to mere nubbins) it is doubtful that either of the 
objects shown in figures 5 and 6 could be held in the one hand. See also figure 6. 


On the few occasions that the animal was observed on land, the forelimb 
functioned admirably for terrestrial progression. Underwater observers report 
that the forelimbs are not used for swimming, but are active in food gathering. 

In light of these observations it is understandable why the animal performs 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 419 


Ficure 6. In this figure, a medium-sized crab leg has been substituted for the pencil 
of figure 5. 


most of the forelimb functions in a bimanual manner. Anatomically, the hand is 
small, the digits are not individualized, and grasp function is poor. Therefore, 
to obtain the observed dexterity the forelimbs must be used together. One hand 
opposing the other provides what we would interpret as a ‘thumb service.’ 

One is reminded of a bilateral human amputee who has lost both hands at 
wrist level, and in the absence of a prosthesis everything that can be done is 
done by opposing the two forearm stumps. 

Thus it is interesting to speculate whether or not an otter could survive if 
one hand was lost. The probability seems good that he could, using the forearm 
stump against the opposite hand. However, to lose one extremity at elbow 
level would probably prove disastrous. 

The anatomical study which follows was made on sea otter ##222 (State of 


420 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


California Fish and Game). The otter was an adult male with an overall body 
length (tip of nose to tip of tail) of 125 cm. The length of the upper arm was 
approximately 14 cm. and the lower arm was of equal length. The length of the 
forefoot (hand) was 7 cm. and the width was 5 cm. It must be kept in mind 
that only a single specimen was used and therefore variations and anomalies 
which are bound to occur between individual specimens are not recorded. 


MUSCLES OF THE FORELIMB OF THE SEA OTTER 


ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF MUSCLES 


Muscle No. Muscle No. 
Abductor digiti quinti 49 Flexor digitorum sublimis ulnaris 48 
Abductor digiti secundi 57 Flexor pollicis brevis 55 
Abductor pollicis brevis 54  Infraspinatus 24 
Abductor pollicis longus 38  Interossei 59 
Acromiodeltoideus 17 _—Latissimus dorsi 15 
Acromiotrapezius 2  Levator anguli scapulae 11 
Adductor digiti quinti 52 Lumbricali 53 
Adductor digiti secundi 57. Omotrachleon 6 
Adductor pollicis 56  Opponens digiti quinti 50 
Anconeus externus 23 + Palmaris longus 40 
Biceps brachii 28  Pectoantebrachialis 2 
Brachialis 29 + Pectoralis major 13 
Brachioradialis 30 ~=©Pectoralis minor 14 
Clavobrachialis 5  Pronator quadratus 46 
Clavotrapezius 3 Pronator teres 44 
Cleidomastoideus 4 Rhomboideus capitis 8 
Dorsoepitrochlearis 19 Rhomboideus major 7 
Extensor carpi radialis brevis 32 Rhomboideus profundus 9 
Extensor carpi radialis longus 31  Serratus magnus 10 
Extensor carpi ulnaris 35 Spinodeltoideus 18 
Extensor digitorum communis 33  Spinotrapezius 1 
Extensor digitorum lateralis 34 Subscapularis 27 
Extensor pollicis et indicis longus 36 Supinator Si] 
Flexor carpi radialis 43 Supraspinatus 26 
Flexor carpi ulnaris 39 Teres major 16 
Flexor digitorum profundus, central head 45 Teres minor 25 
Flexor digitorum profundus, humeral head 42 Triceps brachii caput lateralis 21 
Flexor digitorum profundus, ulna head 41 Triceps brachii caput longus 20 
Flexor digiti quinti brevis 51 ‘Triceps brachii caput medialis 22 
Flexor digitorum sublimis radialis 47 


DESCRIPTIONS OF MUSCLES 


1. Spinotrapezius. 


This muscle is the most posterior of the three muscles which make up the 
trapezius muscle complex. The spinotrapezius, with the acromiotrapezius and 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 421 


Ficure 7. Lateral view of the right side of the trunk to show the superficial trapezius 
muscle complex, which consists of three muscles, the spinotrapezius (1), the acromiotrapezius 
(2), and the clavotrapezius (3). These muscles are vago-accessory, presumably having mi- 
grated posteriorly from the pharyngeal area. Together they form a broad dorsal sheet of 
muscle suspending the pectoral girdle and the forelimb from the middorsal line of the body. 
The scapula is outlined to show its relationship to the musculature. Key: 1, spinotrapezius; 
2, acromiotrapezius; 3, clavotrapezius; 6, omotrachlean (levator scapulae ventralis); 15, 
latissimus dorsi; 18, spinodeltoideus; 19, dorsoepitrachlearis; 20, triceps brachii caput longus; 
24, infraspinatus; A, spinous process of first dorsal vertebra; B, spinous process of eighth 
dorsal vertebra; C, middorsal line-cervical area; D, site of tuberosity on spine of scapula; 
E, lambdoid ridge of skull; S, outline of scapula. 


the clavotrapezius, forms a broad superficial muscle sheath joining the axial 
skeleton to the scapula and forelimb. The muscle is thin and triangular in shape 
with the base along the middorsal line. 

Orictn. Arising by fleshy fibers along the middorsal line and spinous pro- 
cesses from T-2 to T-8, the muscle triangulates toward the tuberosity of the 
scapular spine, where a short, flat tendon develops. 


422 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 8. Lateral view of the right scapular area. The acromiotrapezius muscle (2) has 
been detached from its origin and reflected downward and posteriorly to show the detail of 
its insertion on the scapular spine and acromium process. Note the unattached raphe area 
(B). The deeper rhomboid muscles, (7), (8), (9), lying beneath the acromiotrapezius muscle 
are now exposed. Key: 1, spinotrapezius; 2, acromiotrapezius; 3, clavotrapezius; 6, omo- 
trachlean (levator scapulae ventralis); 7, rhomboideus major; 8, rhomboideus capitis; 9, 
rhomboideus profundus; 15, latissimus dorsi; 19, dorsoepitrachlearis; 24, infraspinatus; 26, 
supraspinatus; A, scapula, spine; B, raphe—unattached to spine of scapula; C, scapula, acro- 
mion process; D, middorsal line, cervical area; S, outline of scapula. 


INSERTION. The tendon inserts on the tuberosity of the spine of the scapula 
along the anterior and distal surface. 

Action. The principal action is to support the scapula and forelimb and 
move these structures toward the middorsal line. 


2. Acromiotrapezius. 


This is the central muscle of the trapezius muscle complex being situated 
between the spinotrapezius posteriorly and the clavotrapezius anteriorly. The 
muscle is thin and broad, and rhomboid in shape. 

Ortcin. Arising by fleshy fibers from a broad base along the middorsal 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 423 


line extending from the midcervical area anteriorly to the spinous process of 
T-2 posteriorly. The muscle passes sheetlike toward the spine of the scapula. 
Here, the muscle fibers end in a crescent-shaped tendinous raphe in the central 
area and in short tendon fibers at the proximal end and fleshy fibers at the dis- 
tal end. 

INSERTION. The proximal tendon fibers insert on the tuberosity of the 
spine of the scapula just distal to the tendon of the spinotrapezius. The distal 
fleshy fibers insert on the full length of the acromion process of the scapula. 
The tendinous raphe spans between the two insertions and is unattached to the 
spine of the scapula, although paralleling it. The distal insertion is crossed 
superficially by the omotrachleon muscle. The tendinous raphe gives origin 
to the spinodeltoideus muscle. 

Action. This muscle assists in the support of the scapula and forelimb 
from the axial skeleton and can assist in rotating the scapula counterclockwise. 


3. Clavotrapezius. 


The anterior muscle of the trapezius muscle complex is also thin and broad 
and closely associated along its posterior border with the acromiotrapezius. 
The muscle is somewhat triangular in shape with a broad base dorsally. 

OrIcGIN. The muscle arises by fleshy fibers from the middorsal line adjacent 
to the origin of the spinotrapezius in the cervical area. The origin extends an- 
teriorly the length of the remaining cervical area to reach the skull at the exter- 
nal occipital crest. The origin then continues laterally along the lambdoid ridge 
of the skull approximately one-third the distance to the jugular process. From 
their origin the muscle fibers pass ventrally toward the shoulder, at which point 
the muscle divides into an anterior one-third and posterior two-thirds. 

INSERTION. The anterior one-third of the muscle continues toward the cla- 
vicular area inserting into the deep fascia at this site since there is no clavicle. 
The posterior two-thirds of the muscle divides about equally into two parts. 
The anterior portion joins with a remaining portion of the cleidomastoid muscle 
at this level to continue distally and eventually reaches the ulna. The posterior 
portion joins with the muscle fibers from the cleidomastoid muscle to form the 
clavobrachialis muscle, which in turn inserts more distally along the pectoral 
ridge of the humerus. 

Action. With this somewhat complicated insertion the muscle acts, in ad- 
dition to supporting the pectoral girdle and drawing it upwards and forward, 
to assist in flexion of both the shoulder and elbow. 


4. Cleidomastoideus. 


This long, thick, straplike muscle joins the skull to the upper extremity. 
Oricin. Arising by fleshy fibers from the anterior and inferior surface of 


424 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 9. Anterolateral view of the right shoulder. The clavotrapezius—cleidomas- 
toideus—and clavobrachialis complex. This somewhat complex muscle arrangement, occur- 
ring over the point of the shoulder, is depicted in figures 9, 10, and 11. The essential feature 
is an interchange of muscle fibers between the clavotrapezius (3) and the cleidomastoideus 
(4) resulting in the formation of the clavobrachialis muscle (5). 


This view shows a division of the clavotrapezius (3) into an anterior one-third which 
spreads out to insert into the pectoral fascia, and a posterior two-thirds being joined by 
fibers of the cleidomastoideus (4) to form the clavobrachialis muscle (5). Not shown in this 
plate is the continuation of the cleidomastoideus (4) and its being joined by muscle fibers 
from the clavotrapezius (3); see figure 11 for this detail. Key: 3, clavotrapezius; 4, cleido- 
mastoideus; 5, clavobrachialis; 6, omotrachlean (levator scapulae ventralis); 13, pectoralis 
major; 26, supraspinatus; 27, subcapularis; A, pectoral fascia; B, sternomastoideus muscle; 
S, scapula, superior border. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 4 


bo 
On 


Ficure 10. Anterolateral view of the right shoulder area identical to figure 8, except 
that the clavotrapezius muscle (3) has been detached from its origin and reflected laterally 
and posteriorly. The sternomastoideus muscle (C) has been reflected anteriorly. The muscle 
interchange to form the clavobrachialis (5) is again shown. Not shown (as in figure 9) is 
the continuation of the cleidomastoideus muscle (4). Key: 3, clavotrapezius; 4, cleidomas- 
toideus; 5, clavobrachialis; 6, omotrachlean (levator scapulae ventralis); 9, rhomboideus 
profundus; 13, pectoralis major; 26, supraspinatus; 27, subscapularis; A, mastoid process 
of the skull; B, transverse process of the first cervical vertebra; C, sternomastoideus muscle; 
S, scapula, superior margin. 


the mastoid process of the skull, the muscle passes in uniform diameter under 
the clavotrapezius and over the omotrachleon toward the shoulder at which 
point the muscle splits into a posterior one-fourth and an anterior three-fourths. 

INSERTION. The posterior one-fourth joins with the muscle fibers from 


426 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


M 


Sem 


FicurEe 11. An enlarged view of the right shoulder area and upper humerus to show 
the continuation of the cleidomastoideus muscle (4) and its receiving of muscle fibers from 
the clavotrapezius (3) (depicted by dotted line). Also shown is the insertion of the clavo- 
brachialis (5) and the acromiodeltoideus (17). Key: 3, clavotrapezius; 4, cleidomastoideus; 
5, clavobrachialis; 17, acromiodeltoideus; 30, brachioradialis; H, humerus. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 427 


the clavotrapezius to form the clavobrachialis muscle. The anterior three- 
fourths joins with the remaining muscle fibers of the clavotrapezius. Thus re- 
inforced, this combined muscle continues distally into the anterior cubital area 
of the elbow where it joins with the pectoantebrachialis muscle which, in turn, 
inserts into the ulna. 

AcTION. With this somewhat complicated insertion it would be difficult 
to analyze the specific action of this muscle. From its position the muscle could 
assist in both flexion of the elbow and shoulder and drawing of the forelimb 
forward and dorsally. 


5. Clavobrachialis. 


This is a rather small flat muscle passing over the shoulder area. 

Oricin. This muscle is made up of fibers from the clavotrapezius and the 
cleidomastoideus as described in the description of each. The newly formed 
muscle converges to a longitudinal linear configuration. 

INSERTION. The muscle fibers insert into the humerus along the pectoral 
ridge at its junction with the deltoid ridge. The insertion is adjacent to and 
just posterior to the insertion of the pectoralis major muscle and just distal to 
the insertion of the spinodeltoideus and acromiodeltoideus muscles. 

AcTION. This small muscle, by virtue of its position, could assist in abduc- 
tion and flexion of the humerus. 


6. Omotrachleon (levator scapulae ventralis). 


This is a long, flat, ribbonlike muscle connecting the scapula to the spine. 

ORIGIN. This muscle arises by fleshy fibers from the anteromedial surface 
of the transverse process of the first cervical vertebra. At its point of origin 
it overlies the origin of the rhomboideus profundus muscle. The muscle passes 
obliquely posteriorly across the neck toward the acromion process of the scapula. 

INSERTION. About one-fourth of the fibers split off anteriorly just before 
reaching the acromion process of the scapula. These fibers join the panniculus 
carnosus muscle of the forelimb. The remaining fibers insert into the posterior 
border of the acromion process of the scapula. 

AcTIon. This muscle serves to support the scapula and rotate it counter- 
clockwise. 


7. Rhomboideus major. 


This thin, flat, triangular muscle lies beneath the trapezius muscle complex 
and connects the scapula with the axial skeleton. 

OricIn. Fleshy fibers arise from the middorsal line of the cervical area 
starting just posterior to the external occipital crest and continue posteriorly 
the full length of the cervical spine into the thoracic area to terminate at the 


428 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


FicurE 12. Lateral view of the right shoulder and neck area to show origin and insertion 
of omotrachlean muscle (levator scapulae ventralis) (6) and its relation to the other muscles 
in the area. The rhomboideus major (7) and the rhomboideus capitis (8) have been reflected 
dorsally. The clavotrapezius (3) detached at its origin, is reflected anteriorly for clear 
exposure of the underlying musculature. The spinotrapezius has been removed. Key: 2, acro- 
miotrapezius; 3, clavotrapezius; 4, cleidomastoideus; 6, omotrachlean (levator scapulae ven- 
tralis) ; 7, rhomboideus major; 8, rhomboideus capitis; 9, rhomboideus profundus; 17, acro- 
miodeltoideus; 18, spinodeltoideus; 19, dorsoepitrochlearis; 20, triceps brachii caput longus; 
24, infraspinatus; 27, subscapularis; A, to the panniculus carnosus; B, transverse process 
of first cervical vertebra; C, sternomastoid muscle; S, scapula, acromion process. 


dorsal spine of T-3. From its origin the muscle triangulates toward the posterior 
portion of the vertebral border of the scapula. 

INSERTION. Fleshy and tendinous fibers insert along the vertebral border 
of the scapula, starting at the inferior angle and extending anteriorly to the 
origin of the scapular spine. At this point, a tendinous raphe is formed which 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 429 


E 


yi a I ad 


Ficure 13. Dorsolateral view of right cervical and scapular to show the rhomboid 
muscle complex. This group of three muscles, the rhomboideus major (7), capitis (8), and 
profundus (9), form a sheet-like layer beneath the trapezius muscle group. In this plate 
the spinotrapezius (1) and the acromiotrapezius (2) have been detached at their origins 
and reflected ventrally. The clavotrapezius has been removed. As noted from their origins 
and insertions, these three rhomboid muscles act to support the pectoral girdle drawing it 
forward and rotating it clockwise. Key: 1, spinotrapezius; 2, acromiotrapezius; 4, cleido- 
mastoideus; 6, omotrachlean (levator scapulae ventralis); 7, rhomboideus major; 8, rhom- 
boideus capitis; 9, rhomboideus profundus; 24, infraspinatus; 25, supraspinatus; A, mastoid 
process of skull; B, deep cervical musculature; C, lambdoid ridge of skull; D, spinous pro- 
cess of first dorsal vertebra; 5, middorsal line, cervical area; S, outline of scapular. 


spans the area of origin of the spine, then joins the remaining fibers to insert 
along the anterior ridge of origin of the scapular spine. This latter portion over- 
lies and more-or-less joins with the insertion of the rhomboideus capitis. 

Action. This muscle pulls the scapula forward as in shrugging the shoulder. 
It can also rotate the scapula clockwise. 


8. Rhomboideus capitis. 


The second of the rhomboideus muscle group is a thin, flat, elongated muscle 
connecting the skull with the scapula. The muscle parallels to a degree the in- 
ferior border of the rhomboideus major and underlies the trapezius musculature 
in this area. 

Oricin. Arising by fleshy fibers from the lateral one-third of the lambdoidal 


430 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 14. Dorsolateral view of cervical and scapular area identical with figure 13 
except that the rhomboideus major (7) has been detached from its origin and reflected 
posteriorly at its insertion. The origin and insertion of the rhomboideus capitis (8) is shown. 
Key: 1, spinotrapezius—reflected; 2, acromiotrapezius—reflected; 4, cleidomastoideus; 
6, omotrachlean; 7, rhomboideus major—reflected; 8, rhomboideus capitis; 9, rhomboideus 
profundus; 24, infraspinatus; 26, supraspinatus; A, mastoid process of the skull; S, outline 
of scapula. 


crest and the jugular process of the skull, the muscle courses inferiorly to pass 
over the supraspinatus fossa of the scapula where it widens in a flare-type man- 
ner terminating in a thin, flat, tendinous, sheath. 

INSERTION. This flat, thin tendon inserts along the spine of the scapula 
more or less fusing with the tendon of the rhomboideus major but also continues 
its insertion along the vertebral margin of the scapula superiorly approximately 
two-thirds of the distance to the first angulation of this margin. 

ActTIon. The muscle draws the scapula forward and acts to rotate the scap- 
ula clockwise. 


9. Rhomboideus profundus. 


The third and deepest of the rhomboid muscles underlies, for the most part, 
the rhomboideus capitis and connects the spine to the scapula. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 431 


Ficure 15. Lateral view of right scapula. The rhomboideus major (7) and the rhom- 
boideus capitis (8) have been reflected posteriorly to show the detail of insertion of the 
rhomboideus profundus (9) on the scapula. Again, the spinotrapezius (1) and the acro- 
miotrapezius (2) have been reflected as in the previous plate. Key:° 1, spinotrapezius—re- 
flected; 2, acromiotrapezius—reflected; 7, rhomboideus major—reflected; 8, rhomboideus 
capitis—reflected; 9, rhomboideus profundus; 24, infraspinatus; 26, supraspinatus; S, out- 
line of scapula. 


OricIn. This muscle arises by fleshy fibers from the inferior surface of the 
transverse process of C-1 vertebra overlying the origin of the omotrachleon mus- 
cle. From this point the strap-type muscle passes obliquely inferiorly to underlie 
the rhomboideus capitis as it reaches the scapula area. Near its insertion the 
muscle spans out ending in a thin tendinous sheath in a manner similar to the 
rhomboideus capitis. 

INSERTION. The tendon of the rhomboideus profundus inserts with that of 
the rhomboideus capitis but extends more superiorly along the vertebral margin 
of the scapula to the first angulation of the vertebral border. 


432 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


AcTIon. This muscle’s action is the same as that of the rhomboideus capitis, 
drawing the scapula forward and rotating it clockwise. 


10. Serratus magnus. 


This large, flat, interdigitated muscle connects the rib cage with the ver- 
tebral margin of the scapula, and is the posterior portion of a common suspen- 
sory sheet of muscle which includes superiorly the levator anguli scapulae. The 
muscle is best observed as the vertebral margin of the scapula is spread out 
from the rib cage. 

OriciIn. Arising by fleshy digitations from ribs 1 to 6; starting on rib 1 
near the spine the origin continues in an oblique line to rib 6 at about the level 
of the midlateral line of the chest. The muscle triangulates from its origin to- 
ward the vertebral margin of the scapula and, in doing so, the digitation is 
joined into a flat muscular sheath, the superior margin of which becomes con- 
tinuous with the levator anguli scapulae. 

INSERTION. The serratus magnus portion of this muscle sheath inserts 
on the vertebral margin of the scapula starting at the inferior angle and extend- 
ing superiorly to the level of origin of the scapular spine where it joins the leva- 
tor anguli scapulae. The insertion is deep to that of the rhomboideus major. 

Action. This muscle acts to hold the scapula against the chest wall and 
serves to suspend the trunk in weight bearing. It can also move the scapula in 
the line of its fibers. 


11. Levator anguli scapulae. 


This muscle is, in effect, the superior continuation of the serratus magnus 
and connects the cervical spine to the scapula. 

OricIN. Fleshy fibers arise from the transverse processes and intervening 
fascia of C-3 to C-7. A sheet of muscle is formed which triangulates toward 
the vertebral margin of the scapula. The inferior border approximates the 
superior border of the serratus magnus distally to form a common muscle. 

INSERTION. The levator anguli scapulae portion of the muscle sheath in- 
serts superiorly to the serratus magnus in a similar manner along the vertebral 
margin of the scapula from the origin of the scapular spine halfway to the 
superior angle of the scapula. 

Action. In view of the muscle’s more dorsal origin, the action is to sus- 
pend the scapula and rotate the scapula clockwise. It also assists the serratus 
magnus muscle in holding the vertebral margin of the scapula to the chest wall. 


12. Pectoantebrachialis. 


This muscle is the most superficial of the pectoral muscle group. It is a 
large, strong, triangular muscle connecting the trunk to the forearm. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 433 


Ficure 16. Dorsal view of right-shoulder area. The trapezius muscles have been re- 
moved. The rhomboideus major (7) is shown reflected outward from the vertebral margin 
of the scapula. The scapula has been spread outward from the body to disclose the serratus 
magnus (10) and the levator anguli scapulae (11) muscles. These broad, flat but thick and 
strong muscles act as a sling support for the trunk between the forelimbs. The two muscles 
form a common and continuous muscle sheath, their division being based on the site of ori- 
gin, the levator anguli scapulae (11) from the cervical area, serratus magnus (10) from the 
rib cage. Key: 7, rhomboideus major—reflected; 10, serratus magnus; 11, levator anguli 
scapulae; 27, subscapularis; A, fifth rib; B, deep cervical musculature; C, middorsal line 
cervical area; D, transverse process of third cervical vertebra; S, scapula, vertebral margin. 


OricIn. Fleshy fibers arise from the superior part of the sternum start- 
ing at the upper border of the manubrium and reaching to between ribs 1 and 
2. The muscle then courses obliquely inferiorly over the pectoral musculature 
toward the anterior cubital area where the muscle converges and, joined by 


434 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 17. Anterior view of the right humerus and upper chest with the forelimb ro- 
tated externally. The cleidomastoideus (4) and clavotrapezius (3) are reflected laterally. 
The sternomastoid muscle (A) is detached at its insertion and reflected superiorly. The pec- 
toral muscle complex is thus revealed. This complex consists of three flat, thick, and strong 
muscles arising from the anterior upper chest, connecting the trunk to the upper extremities. 
The most superficial is the pectoantebrachialis (12) which overlies the pectoralis major (13), 
which in turn overlies the pectoralis minor (14). This strong muscle group flexes and in- 
ternally rotates the humerus. In addition, action of the pectoantebrachialis (12) is to assist 
in flexion of the elbow. Further detail of the relationship of these three muscles is shown 
in figures 18, 19, and 20. Key: 3, clavotrapezius—reflected; 4, cleidomastoideus—reflected ; 
5, clavobrachialis—reflected; 12, pectoantebrachialis; 13, pectoralis major; 14, pectoralis 
minor; 19, dorsoepitrochlearis; 20, triceps brachii caput longus; 22, triceps brachii caput 
medialis; 26, supraspinatus; 28, biceps brachii; 30, brachioradialis; A, sternocleidomastoid 
muscle—reflected; B, sternum, manubrium; C, sternum, corpus; D, extensor muscles of 
the forearm; E, flexor muscles of the forearm; H, humerus; U, ulna. 


fibers from both the cleidomastoideus laterally and pectoralis major medially, 
forms a strong tendon. 

INSERTION. Passing deep to the tendon of insertion of the biceps, the 
heavy tendon of the pectoantebrachialis inserts on the medial ridge of the ulna 
at the conoid process just distal to the joint surface. 

AcTION. Strong flexion of the elbow is accomplished plus assistance in 
flexion of the humerus. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 435 


Ficure 18. Anterior view of the right upper chest and humerus with the forelimb ro- 
tated externally. This is essentially the same view as figure 17 but with the pectoantebrachi- 
alis (12) reflected laterally to show the pectoralis major (13) and the lower fibers of the mus- 
cle joining with the pectoantebrachialis (12) which in turn joins the cleidomastoideus (4) 
for common insertion into the proximal ulna. The lower part of the pectoralis minor has 
been omitted in this drawing. Key: 4, cleidomastoideus; 5, clavobrachialis; 12, pectoante- 
brachialis—reflected; 13, pectoralis major; 14, pectoralis minor; 19, dorsoepitrochlearis; 
20, triceps brachii caput longus; 22, triceps brachii caput medialis; 26, supraspinatus; 28, 
biceps brachii; 30, brachioradialis; A, sternocleidomastoid—reflected; B, sternum, manu- 
brium; C, sternum, corpus; D, extensor muscles of forearm; E, flexor muscles of forearm; 
H, humerus; U, ulna. 


13. Pectoralis major. 


This strong, broad, rhomboid muscle of the pectoral group underlies the pec- 
toantebrachialis and connects the sternum to the humerus. The muscle is heavi- 
est superiorly. 

OricIn. There is a continuous origin of fleshy fibers from the top of the 
manubrium to the fourth rib level inferiorly. This forms the base of the muscle 
which then continues transversely as a broad sheet to the humerus. In so do- 
ing, the muscle overlies the pectoralis minor and bridges the anterior chest. 
Short thin tendinous fibers develop on the underside as the humerus is ap- 
proached. 


436 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 19. An anterior view of the right shoulder and upper arm musculature in a 
limited area. The pectoantebrachialis (12) has been detached from its origin and reflected 
inferiorly to show its contribution of muscle fibers to the pectoralis major (13) near its distal 
insertion on the humerus, and also the joining of the cleidomastoideus (4) with the pecto- 
antebrachialis (12) to form a common tendon. Key: 4, cleidomastoideus; 5, clavobrachialis; 
12, pectoantebrachialis; 13, pectoralis major; 14, pectoralis minor; 26, supraspinatus; 27, 
subscapularis; S, scapula, supraglenoid area of superior border. 


INSERTION. The insertion of this muscle extends practically the entire 
length of the humerus, starting superiorly at the greater tuberosity at the mar- 
gin of insertion of the supraspinatus tendon and extending distally along the 
lateral side of the pectoral ridge and humeral crest to the cubital fossa area. 


VoL. XXXTIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 437 


De 


Ficure 20. Anterior view of right shoulder area with the forelimb adducted and exter- 
nally rotated. The pectoantebrachialis (12) and the pectoralis major (13) have been de- 
tached from their origins and reflected laterally, thus exposing the insertion of the under- 
lying pectoralis minor (14). With adduction of the forelimb the latissimus dorsi (15) comes 
into view and overlies the triceps muscle group. Note raphe-type insertion of the upper part 
of the pectoralis major (13). Also shown are the pectoralis major (13) fibers joining the 
pectoantebrachialis (12). Key: 12, pectoantebrachialis; 13, pectoralis major; 14, pectoralis 
minor; 15, latissimus dorsi; 26, supraspinatus; 27, subscapularis; 28, biceps brachii; A, 
raphe-type insertion of pectoralis major; B, forearm flexor musculature; H, humerus; S, 
scapula, superior margin; U, ulna. 


At the upper end, a tendinous raphe is present, and at the lower end some fleshy 
and tendinous fibers join the pectoantebrachialis muscle. 


Action. This muscle is a strong flexor and internal rotator of the humerus, 
and it also assists in adduction of the forelimb. 


14. Pectoralis minor. 


This deepest muscle of the pectoral group underlies the pectoralis major 
and joins the trunk to the humerus. 


438 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 21. Lateral view of right thoracic and shoulder area to show origin of large and 
strong latissimus dorsi (15) muscle from the trunk, and its relation to the scapula and ad- 
jacent musculature. The spinotrapezius muscle which overlies the dorsal and anterior area 
of the latissimus dorsi (15) has been removed. Key: 7, rhomboideus major; 15, latissimus 
dorsi; 19, dorsoepitrochlearis; 24, infraspinatus; A, spinous process of eighth dorsal vertebra; 
S, outline of scapula. 


Oricin. Arising by fleshy fibers from the border of the sternum, rib levels 
2 to 7, this thin flat rectangular muscle courses toward the humerus under the 
pectoralis major and over the biceps muscle. There is a tendency towards 
clefting of the muscle in its upper part between ribs 2 and 3. Near the humerus 
a broad thin tendon develops. 

INSERTION. The tendon inserts on the humerus just medial and parallel to 
the pectoralis major along the length of the pectoral ridge. The uppermost and 
more fleshy fibers insert on the greater tuberosity of the humerus just medial 
to the tendon of insertion of the supraspinatus. At the lower or most distal end 
the tendon is joined by fleshy and tendinous fibers of the anterior half of the 
split latissimus dorsi muscle for common insertion. 

Action. Along with the pectoralis major this muscle flexes, internally ro- 
tates, and adducts the humerus. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 439 


Ficure 22. Anterior view of the right shoulder and humerus with the upper extremity 
in external rotation. The pectoral muscles (13) and (14) are reflected laterally exposing the 
biceps brachii (28) and the teres major (16). The biceps brachii is displaced a bit laterally. 
The latissimus dorsi (15) is now viewed as the two halves reach their insertion on the 
humerus. A common tendon of insertion is formed with the teres major and the pectoralis 
major. Key: 13, pectoralis major; 14, pectoralis minor; 15, latissimus dorsi; 16, teres major; 
19, dorsoepitrochlearis; 20, triceps brachii caput longus; 22, triceps brachii caput medialis; 
26, supraspinatus; 27, subscapularis; 28, biceps brachii; A, tuberosity of the humerus; H, 
humerus, S, scapula, superior margin. 


15. Latissimus dorsi. 


This is a large, flat, strong muscle, triangular in shape, covering most of 
the thorax from T-3 to T-12 and joining the trunk to the humerus. 

Oricin. Arising by fleshy fibers from the middorsal line and spinous processes 
from T-3 to T-9 and then from the lumbar fascia to T-12 level inferiorly and 
ribs 10 and 11 level midlaterally. This large sheetlike muscle triangulates to- 
ward the inferior angle of the scapula, which it crosses to disappear under the 
dorsoepitrochlearis. At about this point the muscle divides into a dorsal, or 
proximal, two-fifths and a ventral, or distal, three-fifths, but both divisions con- 


440 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


5 Cim 


Ficure 23. Anterior view of the right shoulder and humerus with upper extremity in 
external rotation. This is essentially the same view as in figure 22 except that the biceps 
brachii (28) is now displaced medially to disclose the detail of insertion of that portion of 
the latissimus dorsi (15) which joins the pectoralis minor (14). The pectoral muscles (13) 
and (14) are again reflected laterally. Key: 13, pectoralis major; 14, pectoralis minor; 15, 
latissimus dorsi; 16, teres major; 19, dorsoepitrochlearis; 20, triceps brachii caput longus; 
22, triceps brachii caput medialis; 26, supraspinatus; 27, subscapularis; 28, biceps brachii; 
A, tendon fibers begin here; H, humerus; S, scapula, superior border. 


tinue under the triceps musculature to gain access to the medial side of the hu- 
merus. 

INSERTION. At this point, the proximal two-fifths portion narrows and flat- 
tens into a tendon which passes between the biceps brachii and the humerus to 
join that of the teres major for a common insertion on the humerus along the 
pectoral ridge and just under the insertion of the pectoralis minor. The distal 
three-fifths of the muscle passes as fleshy fibers anterior to the biceps brachii, 
then, spreading into flat tendinous fibers, joins the deep side of the tendon of 
the pectoralis minor for a common insertion with this tendon. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 441 


yf 


— —o——08 ut 


Ficure 24. Lateral view of the right shoulder and forelimb. The relationship of the 
acromiodeltoideus (17) and the spinodeltoideus (18) is shown. Also, the insertion of the 
levator anguli scapulae (11) on the acromion process of the scapula is seen. The clavobrachi- 
alis (5) has been reflected anteriorly to show its tendinous insertion on the humerus. The 
relationship of the other muscles in this lateral view is to be noted. Key: 1, spinotrapezius; 
2, acromiotrapezius; 3, clavotrapezius; 4, cleidomastoideus; 5, clavobrachialis; 7, rhom- 
boideus major; 11, levator anguli scapulae; 15, latissimus dorsi; 16, teres major; 17, acro- 
miodeltoideus; 18, spinodeltoideus; 19, dorsoepitrochlearis; 20, triceps brachii caput longus; 
21, triceps brachii caput lateralis; 23, anconeus externus; 30, brachioradialis; 31, extensor 
carpi radialis longus; 32, extensor carpi radialis brevis; 33, extensor digitorum communis; 
34, extensor digitorum lateralis; 35, extensor carpi ulneris; A, forearm fascia; B, panniculus 
carnosa; C, scapula, acromion process; H, humerus; U, ulna; S, scapula, vertebral border. 


442 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 25. Enlarged localized lateral view of the right shoulder area to show detail of 
spinodeltoideus (18) joining acromiodeltoideus (17) to gain insertion on the humerus. To 
show this adequately the acromiodeltoideus (17) has been rotated anteriorly, thus exposing 
the undersurface where the juncture of the two muscles occurs. Key: 5, clavobrachialis; 
11, levator anguli scapulae; 16, teres major; 17, acromiodeltoideus; 18, spinodeltoideus; 
19, dorsoepitrochlearis; 20, triceps brachii caput longus; 21, triceps brachii caput lateralis; 
30, brachioradialis; H, humerus; S, scapula, acromion process. 


Action. This muscle is a strong extensor and internal rotator of the hu- 
merus. 


16. Teres major. 


This short but strong muscle connects the inferior border of the scapula with 
the humerus. 

OricIn. Muscle fibers arise from the inferior angle and dorsal one-half of 
the inferior border of the scapula with some tendinous fibers from the fascia 
overlying the infraspinatus muscle in this area to form a somewhat cone-shaped 
muscle paralleling the inferior scapular border passing directly toward the hu- 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 443 


FicurE 26. The triceps muscle complex is a group of strong muscles arising from the 
scapula or humerus with insertion on the olecranon process of the ulna to give extension of 
the elbow joint. The triceps musculature proper consists of the triceps brachii caput longus 
(20), lateralis (21), and medialis (22). The caput medialis has basically three divisions, 
having a somewhat complicated configuration and relationship to the caput lateralis (see 
figure 27). This triad of muscles is reinforced by the large dorsoepitrochlearis (19) which, 
due to its site of origin from the scapular margin, is responsible for the posterior webbing 
between the humerus and the scapula. Also, the small anconeus externus (23) is an accessory 
to this group (see figure 29). 

This figure is a posterolateral view of the upper right extremity to show detail of the 
triceps brachii caput longus (20) and lateralis (21), and the dorsoepitrochlearis (19). Note 
a few tendon fibers (C) from the dorsoepitrochlearis (19) joining the tendon of the triceps 
brachii caput longus (20). Key: 11, levator anguli scapulae; 15, latissimus dorsi; 16, teres 
major; 17, acromiodeltoideus; 18, spinodeltoideus; 19, dorsoepitrochlearis; 20, triceps brachii 
caput longus; 21, triceps brachii caput lateralis; A, deep fascia of the forearm; B, forearm 
extensor musculature; C, tendon fibers, from (19) entering tendon of (20); H, humerus; 
S, outline of scapula, axillary border; U, ulna, olecranon process. 


merus. Near the humerus the muscle is joined by muscle and tendon fibers of the 
superior portion of the latissimus dorsi. A flat strong tendon forms which passes 
under the biceps brachii. 

INSERTION. This tendon now inserts into the humerus on the medial side 
and nearly parallel to the insertion of the pectoralis minor. 

Action. Adduction and internal rotation of the humerus is accomplished 
by this muscle. 


444 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 27. Medial view of the right forelimb and shoulder area with the forelimb in 
full external rotation to show the triceps brachii caput medialis (22), its various parts, and 
their relationships to each other and to the caput lateralis (21). The caput longus (20) of 
the triceps has been completely removed. The biceps brachii (28) is displaced anteriorly to 
visualize the deeper triceps brachii caput medialis (22). 

Note the three (22) labels which mark the three parts of the medial head. The upper 
(22) label is the intermediate part (anconeus internus). The middle (22) label is the long 
part (anconeus medialis). The lower (22) label is the medial part (anconeus medialis). Key: 
21, triceps brachii caput lateralis; 22, triceps brachii caput medialis; 25, teres minor; 27, 
subscapularis; 28, biceps brachii; 29, brachialis; 30, brachioradialis; A, site of origin of 
triceps brachialis, caput longus; B, medial epicondylar ridge of humerus; C, forearm flexor 
musculature; H, humerus, articular surface of head; S, scapula, infraglenoid area; U, ulna, 
olecranon process. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 445 


Ficure 28. The shoulder cuff muscles of the scapula consist of the subscapularis (27), 
supraspinatus (26), infraspinatus (24), and teres minor (25). All four of these muscles 
arise from the surface of the scapula and terminate in a tendinous cuff about the shoulder 
which inserts on the humerus, stabilizing and activating this joint. The tendons are inti- 
mately associated with the shoulder joint capsule. 

This right lateral view of the scapula and shoulder area has all muscles removed that 
attach to the scapula except for those arising from the scapular fossae (lateral surface). Key: 
21, triceps brachii caput lateralis; 24, infraspinatus; 25, teres minor; 26, supraspinatus; 30, 
brachioradialis; A, extensor musculature of the forearm; H, humerus, greater tuberosity; 
S, scapula, acromion process. 


17. Acromiodeltoideus. 


Joining the scapula to the humerus, this small but stout triangular muscle 
overlies the point of the shoulder. 

OriciIn. From the full width of the most distal margin of the acromion 
process muscle fibers arise on the undersurface and tendinous fibers on the 
outer surface to form a short muscle which then passes over the lateral aspect 
of the shoulder joint to the upper humerus. 

INSERTION. With tendinous fibers developing on the undersurface but 
fleshy fibers persisting on the outer surface, the muscle inserts into the distal 
area of the deltoid ridge after first receiving the tendinous and the fleshy fibers 


446 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 29. Anterolateral view of the right scapula and shoulder to show the detail of 
insertion of the supraspinatus (26) in relation to the bicipital groove and infraspinatus (24) 
and subscapularis (27) muscles. Key: 21, triceps brachii caput longus; 24, infraspinatus; 
26, supraspinatus; 27, subscapularis; 28, biceps brachii; 30, brachioradialis; A, extensor 
musculature of the forearm; B, biceps brachii tendon in bicipital groove of humerus; C, 
humerus, lesser tuberosity; H, humerus, greater tuberosity; S, scapula, acromion process. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 447 


Ficure 30. Medial view of the right scapula and shoulder to show the detail of sub- 
scapularis muscle (27). The biceps brachii (28) has been displaced somewhat anteriorly and 
the upper tendon lifted out of the bicipital groove of the humerus. Key: 21, triceps brachii 
caput lateralis; 22, triceps brachii caput medialis; 26, supraspinatus; 27, subscapularis; 28, 
biceps brachii; 29, brachialis; A, biceps brachii tendon out of bicipital groove; H, humerus, 
lesser tuberosity; S, scapula, axillary border. 


of the spinodeltoideus muscle. The insertion is linear between the insertion of the 
pectoralis muscles and the origin of the brachioradialis. 

Action. This muscle can abduct the humerus and possibly give slight ex- 
ternal rotation as well. 


18. Spinodeltoideus. 


This small triangular muscle joins the spine area of the scapula to the hu- 
merus via the acromiotrapezius and courses with convergence toward the acro- 
miodeltoideus muscle. 

INSERTION. Both fleshy and tendinous fibers join the undersurface of the 
acromiodeltoideus and proceed to a common insertion with this muscle on the 
humerus just proximal to the insertion of the clavobrachialis. 

Action. Acting with the acromiodeltoideus some degree of abduction, ex- 
tension, and external rotation of the humerus is accomplished. 


448 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


| 


“ rare A ee 


Ficure 31. Anteromedial view of the right forelimb to show origin and insertion of the 
biceps brachii muscle (28). The supraspinatus muscle (26) and the subscapularis muscle 
(27) have been retracted sufficiently to disclose the upper border of the glenoid. The pecto- 
antebrachialis (12) has been excised near its insertion. Key: 12, pectoantebrachialis; 22, 
triceps brachii caput medialis; 26, supraspinatus; 27, subscapularis; 28, biceps brachii; 29, 
brachialis; 30, brachioradialis; A, greater tuberosity of the humerus; B, lesser tuberosity of 
the humerus; C, forearm flexor musculature; D, forearm extensor musculature; S, scapula, 
supraglenoid area; R, radius; U, ulna. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 449 


Ficure 32. Lateral view of the right upper extremity to show the brachialis and the 
brachioradialis muscles. The triceps mechanism has been displaced posteriorly somewhat 
and the more superficial muscles of the upper arm and shoulder area have been removed. 
The superficial sensory branch of the radial nerve is shown displaced from its normal position 
between the brachioradialis (30) and the radial wrist extensors (31) (32). Key: 21, triceps 
brachii caput lateralis; 22, triceps brachii caput medialis; 24, infraspinatus; 25, teres minor; 
26; supraspinatus; 29, brachialis; 30, brachioradialis; 31, extensor carpi radialis longus; 32, 
extensor carpi radialis brevis; 33, extensor digitorum communis; 34, extensor digitorum 
lateralis; 35, extensor digitorum ulnaris; A, radial nerve; H, humerus; R, radius (radial sty- 
loid) ; S, scapula, acromion process. 


19. Dorsoepitrochlearis. 


This strong, somewhat flat and triangular, fleshy muscle connects the scap- 
ula to the forearm on the extensor surface, thus becoming a functional part of 
the triceps muscle complex. 


450 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


5iem 


Ficure 33. Posterior view of the right upper arm to show origin and insertion of anco- 
neus externus (23). Triceps brachii caput lateralis (21) has been detached near its insertion 
and displaced medialward. The triceps brachii caput longus (20) has been removed except 
for its tendon of origin and insertion. The scapula is located presenting the axillary border. 
Key: 20, triceps brachii caput longus; 21, triceps brachii caput lateralis; 22, triceps brachii 
caput medialis; 23, anconeus externus; 24, infraspinatus; 27, subscapularis; 30, brachioradi- 
alis; 31, extensor carpi radialis longus; 32, extensor carpi radialis brevis; 33, extensor digi- 
torum communis; 34, extensor digitorum lateralis; H, humerus, lateral epicondylar crest; 
R, radius, radial head outline; S, scapula, infraglenoid area; U, ulna, olecranon process. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 451 


Ficure 34. Lateral view of right forearm and elbow area to show relationship of the 
superficial dorsal musculature. Note the transverse dorsal carpal ligament at wrist level (A). 
Key: 21, triceps brachii caput lateralis; 23, anconeus externus; 30, brachioradialis; 31, ex- 
tensor carpi radialis longus; 32, extensor carpi radialis brevis; 33, extensor digitorum com- 
munis; 34, extensor digitorum lateralis; 35, extensor carpi ulnaris; 36, extensor pollicis et 
indicis longus; 38, abductor pollicis; 39, flexor carpi ulnaris; A, transverse dorsal carpal 
ligament; B, radial nerve, distal portion displaced from its bed; R, radius, outline of radial 
head; U, ulna, olecranon process. 


OricIn. The muscle arises by fleshy and tendinous fibers from the dorsal 
three-fifths of the inferior border of the scapula adjacent to and overlying the 
origin of the teres major muscle. From its origin, the muscle triangulates toward 
the point of the elbow paralleling the long head of the triceps brachii and over- 
lying the latissimus dorsi. 

INSERTION. At the elbow a flat tendon forms which overrides the olecranon 
process. Except for a few short tendinous fibers which join the tendon of the 
long head of the triceps brachii, this muscle inserts into the deep fascia of the 
upper part of the forearm, mostly on the medial side. 

AcTION. Strong extension of the elbow is accomplished. 


20. Triceps brachii caput longus. 


This strong spindle-shaped muscle with a tendon at each end joins the scapula 
to the ulna, and is part of the triceps muscle complex. 

OricIN. Arising as a heavy tendon with but few fleshy fibers from the in- 
ferior surface of the neck of the scapula adjacent to the glenoid, the muscle 
courses distally down the posterior surface of the humerus between the dorso- 


452 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 35. An anterolateral view of the right upper extremity to show the relationship 
of the brachialis (29) to the pronator teres (44) and the supinator (37) muscles. The radial 
carpal extensors (31) and (32) have been reflected at their origin and the brachioradialis 
(30) has been excised except for its insertion on the distal radius. The muscles overlying the 
brachialis (29) have been removed. Key: 29, brachialis; 30, brachioradialis; 31, extensor 
carpi radialis longus; 32, extensor carpi radialis brevis; 33, extensor digitorum communis; 
34, extensor digitorum lateralis; 35, extensor carpi ulnaris; 37, supinator, 38, abductor pol- 
licis longus; 44, pronator teres; R, radius, radial styloid area; U, ulna, coronoid area. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 453 


epitrochlearis and the triceps brachii caput lateralis directly to the olecranon 
process of the ulna. 

INSERTION. A heavy tendon terminating this muscle inserts into the ole- 
cranon process of the ulna posteriorly and medially. Near its actual bony inser- 
tion it receives the tiny tendinous slip from the dorsoepitrochlearis muscle. 

AcTIon. Strong extension of the elbow results from contraction of this mus- 
cle. 


21. Triceps brachii caput lateralis. 


This is another strong fusiform muscle of the triceps muscle complex. This 
muscle connects the upper humerus with the ulna. 

OricIn. Fleshy and tendinous fibers arise from the medial surface of the 
neck of the humerus and adjacent shoulder capsule. The muscle thus formed 
courses distally to the lateral side of the elbow adjacent to the triceps brachii 
caput longus and overlies the origin of the brachialis muscle. In its midportion 
it receives muscle fibers from the medial head of the triceps brachii, and again 
in its distal portion more fibers from the medial head join in a tendinous raphe. 

INSERTION. The muscle terminates at the elbow in a short broad tendon 
which inserts on the posterolateral side of the olecranon process of the ulna ad- 
jacent to and just distal to the insertion of the long head of the triceps brachii. 

AcTION. This muscle joins the other members of the triceps muscle com- 
plex to produce strong extension of the elbow joint. 


22. Triceps brachii caput medialis. 


This muscle is the lesser of the three triceps muscles and consists of three 
distinct parts, all of which are closely approximated to the humerus. The long 
(anconeus posterior) and the intermediate (anconeus internus) portions are 
more closely associated. The medial division (anconeus medialis) is more apart, 
much shorter, and much more distal. 

OricIn. The long portion arises from the posteromedial surface of the up- 
per humerus by thin tendinous fibers from as far proximal as the level of the 
lesser trocanter. The intermediate portion arises to the lateral side of the long 
portion but takes origin by fleshy and tendinous fibers more proximally from 
the posteromedial surface of the neck of the humerus and adjacent capsule of the 
shoulder joint. Both portions progress distally and unite into a common single 
muscle belly after the intermediate portion first gives off muscle fibers to the 
caput lateralis triceps brachii. The medial portion (anconeus medialis) arises 
distally on the humerus from the posterior surface of the medial epicondylar 
flare and the fleshy fibers approach the elbow. 

INSERTION. The tendons of the caput medialis insert on the medial side 
of the olecranon process. 


454 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


12 


Ficure 36. Anterior view of the right forearm in midposition to show the pronator 
(44) supinator (37) relationship. Insertions of the brachialis (29) and the pectoantebrachi- 
alis (12) are shown on the coronoid area of the ulna. Also seen is the insertion of the lower 
biceps tendon on the tubercle of the radius. The radial carpal extensors (31) (32) and the 
brachioradialis (30) muscles are reflected. Key: 12, pectoantebrachialis; 28, biceps brachii; 
29, brachialis; 30, brachioradialis; 31, extensor carpi radialis longus; 32, extensor carpi ra- 
dialis brevis; 33, extensor digitorum communis; 36, extensor pollicis et indicis longus; 38, 
abductor pollicis longus; 44, pronator teres; 43, flexor carpi radialis; H, humerus; R, ra- 
dius, tubercle. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 455 


Action. This muscle joins with others of the triceps muscle complex to 
give strong extension of the elbow joint. 


23. Anconeus externus. 


This short fleshy triangular muscle bridging the elbow joint is, in a sense, 
a counterpart of the anconeus internus (medial part of the caput medialis of 
the triceps brachii). 

OriciIn. This muscle arises from the posterior surface of the lateral epi- 
condylar flare of the distal humerus by fleshy fibers which then course distally 
to the lateral side of the olecranon. 

INSERTION. Fleshy and tendinous fibers insert laterally on the olecranon 
along the semilunar notch. 

Action. This muscle probably assists in extension of the elbow. 


24. Infraspinatus. 


This flat muscle occupying the infraspinatus fossa of the scapula joins the 
scapula to the humerus. 

Oricin. Fleshy fibers arising from the infraspinatus fossa of the scapula 
triangulate toward the upper end of the humerus. The inferior part of the mus- 
cle shows a tendency to linear deviation from the remainder of the muscle mass 
to be designated as the teres minor muscle. At the shoulder the two are joined 
to form a heavy flat tendon forming part of the tendinous cuff of the shoulder 
joint. 

INSERTION. The tendon fibers insert into the lower posterior area of the 
greater tuberosity adjacent to and just below the tendon of the supraspinatus. 

AcTIon. The action is to abduct and externally rotate the humerus. 


25. Teres minor. 


This small muscle lying along the inferior scapular border is hardly distin- 
guishable as separate from the infraspinatus muscle. 

Oricin. The common origin from the infraspinatus fossa with the infra- 
spinatus muscle and a common tendon with this muscle indicates how close the 
association actually is. 

INSERTION. Tendon fibers join with those of the infraspinatus muscle to 
insert on the greater tuberosity of the humerus. The most distal fibers are those 
of the teres minor. 

AcTIon. The muscle contraction produces external rotation of the humerus 
with some assistance in abduction as well. 


26. Supraspinatus. 


This large muscle is a strong, flat, fleshy muscle connecting the scapula to 
the humerus over the top of the shoulder joint. 


456 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


FicurE 37. Lateral view of the right upper arm with the forearm in midposition to 
show origin in relationship of forearm extensor musculature. All muscles arising from the 
lateral epicondylar area have been reflected at their origins except for the supinator (37). 
Key: 29, brachialis; 30, brachioradialis; 31, extensor carpi radialis longus; 32, extensor 
carpi radialis brevis; 33, extensor digitorum communis; 34, extensor digitorum lateralis; 
35, extensor carpi ulnaris; 36, extensor pollicis et indicis longus; 37, supinator; 38, abductor 
pollicis longus; 44, pronator teres; H, humerus, connective tissue overlying the bone; R, 
radius; U, ulna. 


Oricin. Muscle fibers arise from the entire supraspinatus fossa and con- 
verge toward the shoulder joint where a strong flat tendon develops bridging this 
joint as part of the tendinous cuff. 

INSERTION. Tendon fibers enter the greater tuberosity of the humerus ad- 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 457 


Ficure 38. Lateral view of the right upper extremity with the forearm in midposition. 
All forearm extensor musculature has been removed to show origin of supinator muscle (37). 
The interossei membrane is shown spanning between the radius and ulna. Key: 29, brachi- 
alis; 30, brachioradialis; 37, supinator; 44, pronator teres; A, interossei membrane; H, 
humerus, lateral epicondyle. 


jacent and superior to the tendon of the infraspinatus and extend to the margin 
of the bicipital groove. 
AcTIoN. This muscle initiates abduction of the humerus. 


27. Subscapularis. 


This large triangular muscle lying on the underside of the scapula connects 
this bone with the humerus. 

OricIn. Arising as fleshy and tendinous fibers from the entire subscapular 
surface, the muscle triangulates toward the glenoid where, beyond the scapular 
spine, it parallels and approximates the supraspinatus muscle. The flat, heavy 
tendon which then forms bridges the shoulder joint as part of the tendinous cuff 
of this joint. 

INSERTION. The tendon fibers insert into the full width of the lesser tuber- 
osity of the humerus. 

Action. This muscle is a strong internal rotator of the humerus. 


458 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRroc. 4TH SER. 


5 cm 


Ficure 39. An enlarged view of the radial side of the wrist of the right upper extremity. 
Detail of insertion of the radial carpal extensors (31) and (32) and the abductor pollicis 
longus (38) is shown. Note dorsal ligamentous structures which hold tendons in 
position when wrist is dorsiflexed. Key: 30, brachioradialis; 31, extensor carpi radialis 
longus; 32, extensor carpi radialis brevis; 33, extensor digitorum communis; 36, extensor 
pollicis et indicis longus; 38, abductor pollicis; 43, flexor carpi radialis; A, metacarpal-1; 
B, metacarpal-2; C, metacarpal-3; D, radial sesamoid; R, radius, styloid area. 


Note. The tendons of the subscapularis, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus 
(with the teres minor) are closely associated with the superior portion of the 
shoulder joint capsule and form a strong tendinous cuff about the joint. The 
articular surface of the humerus is thus held snuggly against the glenoid sur- 
face of the scapula. 


28. Biceps brachii. 


This single-bellied, spindle-shaped muscle with a well developed tendon at 
each end joins the scapula to the radius. 

OrIcIN. From the tubercle on the neck of the scapula at the superior bor- 
der of the glenoid a heavy tendon arises which passes through the shoulder joint 
proper to enter the bicipital groove at the upper end of the humerus. From 
here the tendon expands into a spindle-shaped muscle lying along the anterior 
surface of the humerus to reach the anterior cubital fossa. The lower tendon 
now forms and passes across the elbow joint to the proximal radius. 

INSERTION. The distal tendon fibers insert into the bicipital tubercle of 
the radius. 

Action. This muscle has the combined action of flexion of the elbow and 
supination of the forearm. 


29. Brachialis. 


This strong thick muscle underlies the brachioradialis muscle in the upper 
one-half of the humerus, and connects the humerus with the ulna. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 459 


Ficure 40. An enlarged view of the dorsal and the distal right forearm and hand to 
show relationship of extensor musculature of the wrist and digits. For digit 2, the extensor 
aponeurosis overlying the proximal phalanx has been split longitudinally and reflected (A) 
to show relationship to the sesamoid and proximal joint (metacarpal-phalangeal joint). 
Also, note ligamentous attachment (B) of sesamoid to base of proximal phalanx, thus caus- 
ing the sesamoid to move with the proximal phalanx on flexion and extension. Distally, the 
extensor digitorum communis (33) and the index portion of the extensor pollicis et indicis 
(36) of the extensor aponeurosis have been divided transversely to show insertion into base 
of dorsum of the middle phalanx (C). For digit 4, the extensor aponeurosis and common 
digital extensors have been split longitudinally (E) and spread apart to show relationship 
to sesamoid. The insertion of the extensor carpi ulnaris (35) into the base of the fifth meta- 
carpal and the abductor pollicis (38) into the base of the first metacarpal are shown. Also 
note the transverse overlying ligaments at wrist level. Key: 30, brachioradialis; 31, extensor 
carpi radialis longus; 32, extensor carpi radialis brevis; 33, extensor digitorum communis; 
34, extensor digitorum lateralis; 35, extensor carpi ulnaris; 36, extensor pollicis et indicis 
longus; 38, abductor pollicis; A, split extensor aponeurosis of digit 2; B, ligament attaching 
sesamoid to proximal phalanx; C, insertion of long extensor tendon on digit 2; D, sesamoid 
bone; E, split extensor tendon of digit 4; F, base of metacarpal 1; G, base of metacarpal 5. 


460 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


= ¢ 
P 

ON 
/), 


S 
AD A 
f 


Ge 


SS 


( 


SES 


OAS 
% 


Ficure 41. Medial view of right upper extremity with forearm in midposition, thus 
presenting its volar or flexor surface. This figure shows the origin and relationship of the 
superficial forearm flexor musculature. The abductor digiti quinti has been displaced out- 
ward from the shaft of the fifth metacarpal. Key: 13, pectoralis major, insertion; 29, brachi- 
alis; 30, brachioradialis; 37, supinator; 40, palmaris longus; 41, flexor digitorum profundus 
(ulnar head); 44, pronator teres; 49, abductor digiti quinti; A, elbow joint; B, pisiform 
bone; H, humerus, medial epicondylar foramen. 


Oricin. Muscle fibers arise from almost the entire posteromedial surface 
of the humerus, from the neck of the humerus above to the lateral epicondylar 
ridge below. Entering the area of the cubital fossa a tendon is formed which 
bridges the elbow joint. 

INSERTION. The tendon of the brachialis muscle inserts on the medial side 
of the proximal ulna adjacent to the insertion of the pectoantebrachialis tendon. 

Action. This muscle is a strong flexor of the elbow joint. 


30. Brachioradialis. 


This is a long elbow-spanning fleshy muscle connecting the proximal hu- 
merus with the distal radius. 

OricIn. Arising as thin flat tendinous fibers from the surface of the upper 
part of the brachialis muscle and from along the deltoid ridge of the humerus 
from the greater tuberosity to the humeral crest, a fleshy muscle belly promptly 
develops which spans the elbow joint anterolaterally then tapers gradually fol- 
lowing the radial border of the forearm to the area of the radial styloid. 

INSERTION. Tendon fibers developing on the underside of the muscle distally 
insert into the bone of the radial styloid. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 461 


Ficure 42. Volar view of right forearm in its distal portion and volar medial view of 
proximal portion as the forearm is in a slightly pronated position. The palmaris longus 
(40) and the flexor carpi ulnaris (39) have been divided and reflected to show origins and 
relationships of the deeper flexor musculature. The musculature of the flexor digitorum 
profundus can, by origin, be divided into three distinct portions, the more superficial humeral 
head (42) and the ulnar head (41), and the deeper central head (45). Not visible in this 
view, the central head has an ulnar, radial, and interosseus portion which will be shown 
later. Distally, all of the profundi group are joined together at the wrist as a broad tendi- 
nous structure from which separate the five profundi tendons, one passing to each digit. 
At wrist level the tendon passes under the deep carpal ligament. Also distally, and in addition 
to the main flexor tendon, the profundi give rise to the sublimi and lumbrical musculature 
which will be described later. Key: 30, brachioradialis; 39, flexor carpi ulnaris; 40, pal- 
maris longus; 41, flexor digitorum profundus, ulnar head; 42, flexor digitorum profundus, 
humeral head; 43, flexor carpi radialis; 44, pronator teres; 49, abductor digiti quinti; U, 
ulna, olecranon area. 


Action. This strong muscle has the double action of flexing the elbow 
and supinating the forearm. 


31. Extensor carpi radialis longus. 


This muscle is the more radial of the two radial carpal extensors. 

OricIn. This muscle arises in common with the extensor carpi radialis 
brevis by muscular fibers from the proximal three-fourths of the lateral epi- 
condylar ridge. The common muscle extends about half-way down the forearm 
before dividing into the longus and brevis portions. In the midforearm the 
longus portion lies between the brachioradialis muscle and the extensor digi- 
torum communis muscle. At wrist level, the tendon passes through a groove 
on the dorsal surface of the radius adjacent to the styloid process. The over- 
lying transverse dorsal carpal ligament forms a compartment for the tendon. 

INSERTION. Bridging the wrist joint the tendon inserts at the base of meta- 
carpal 2 into a tubercle on the dorsum and slightly to the radial side. 

Action. This muscle is a strong dorsiflexor and radial flexor of the wrist 
joint. 


462 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 43. Volar view of right forearm with most of the flexor musculature reflected 
to show the deeply situated flexor digitorum profundus (central head) (45), with its fibers 
joining the ulna humeral divisions at near-wrist level. Also shown in this view are the in- 
sertions of the biceps tendon (28), the pectoantebrachialis tendon (12), and the brachialis 
muscle (29). The origin of the pronator teres (44) in relation to the palmaris longus (40) 
is visualized. Key: 12, pectoantebrachialis; 28, biceps brachii; 29, brachialis; 30, brachio- 
radialis; 39, flexor carpi ulnaris; 40, palmaris longus; 41, flexor digitorum profundus (ulnar 
head) ; 42, flexor digitorum profundus (humeral head) ; 43, flexor carpi radialis; 44, prona- 
tor teres; 45, flexor digitorum profundus (central head); H, humerus, medial epicondyle; 
R, radius, styloid process; U, ulna. 


32. Extensor carpi radialis brevis. 


This muscle is a partner of the extensor carpi radialis longus and also con- 
nects the humerus to the hand. 

OricIN. In common with the extensor carpi radialis longus from the lateral 
epicondylar ridge, this muscle represents the lower fibers of origin. The tendon 
forming in midforearm parallels that of the longus and passes with this tendon 
in the groove at the distal end of the radius. 

INSERTION. Spanning the wrist joint the tendon inserts into the dorsum 
at the base of metacarpal 3. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 463 


\ { { | | 
oa 


Ficure 44. Volar view of right forearm. All flexor musculature has been reflected to 
expose the radius and ulna with intervening interosseus membrane. The flexor digitorum 
profundi musculature has been reflected distally where the tendons are entering the carpal 
canal beneath the deep carpal ligament. Distally, the pronator quadratus muscle (46) is 
shown spanning the two forearm bones. Note insertions of the biceps brachii (28), 
brachialis (29), and pectoantebrachialis (12). Key: 12, pectoantebrachialis; 28, biceps bra- 
chii; 29, brachialis; 30, brachioradialis; 39, flexor carpi ulnaris; 40, palmaris longus; 41, 
flexor digitorum profundus (ulnar head); 42, flexor digitorum profundus (humeral head) ; 
43, flexor carpi radialis; 44, pronator teres; 45, flexor digitorum profundus (central head) ; 
46, pronator quadratus; A, elbow joint; B, deep carpal ligaments; C, interosseus membrane; 
H, humerus, medial epicondyle; R, radius, head; U, ulna. 


Action. Owing to its more central location and insertion, the brevis serves 
only to dorsiflex the wrist. 


33. Extensor digitorum communis. 


This muscle, along with the extensor digitorum lateralis, represents the long 
extensors of the digits except for the thumb. The musculature is in the forearm 
and the tendons extend distally to the middle phalanges. 

Oricin. The muscle arises in common with the extensor digitorum lateralis 
from the lateral epicondylar ridge of the humerus down to and including the 
lateral epicondyle. The extensor digitorum lateralis fibers are the more distal 


464 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


in origin. At its origin, the muscle overlies the extensor carpi radialis brevis 
and appears to share some fibers with this muscle. On the dorsum of the fore- 
arm the muscle lies between the radial-carpal extensors and the extensor digi- 
torum lateralis. At wrist level four separate tendons develop and pass through 
a groove at the distal radius, following which they spread out and span to each 
of the digits 2, 3, 4, and 5. Over the metacarpal area small tendinous slips may 
develop which rejoin the same or adjacent tendon at the metacarpal-phalangeal 
joint area. 

INSERTION. At the metacarpal-phalangeal joint level each tendon expands 
and joins into the extensor hood and the extensor aponeurosis mechanism, but 
the central fibers continue down the dorsum of the proximal phalanx to insert 
at the base of the middle phalanx. At the metacarpal-phalangeal joint level a 
light fibrous attachment is noted to the sesamoid at this site. The sesamoid, 
however, is more associated with the joint capsule than with the extensor tendon. 

ActTIOoN. The primary action of the tendon is to extend the metacarpal- 
phalangeal joint through the hood mechanism. However, with the metacarpal- 
phalangeal joint stabilized so that hyperextension does not occur, the central 
fibers then act to extend the proximal interphalangeal joint. 


34. Extensor digitorum lateralis. 


This partner of the extensor digitorum communis muscle provides an extra 
long extensor tendon for the fourth and fifth digits. 

Oricin. The muscle arises in common with the extensor digitorum com- 
munis representing the more distal portion of this origin, the lateral humeral 
epicondyle and epicondylar ridge. Separation from the communis occurs on 
the ulnar side of this muscle and near the wrist two individual tendons develop 
which pass through a separate compartment in a groove of the distal radius. 
From here, the more radial of the two tendons passes beneath the communis 
tendon of digit 5 to the midmetacarpal area to join with the communis tendon 
of digit 4 at the extensor hood level. The more ulnar tendon parallels the com- 
mon extensor tendon of digit 5 to join into the extensor hood of this digit on 
the ulnar side. 

INSERTION. Joining with the communis extensor tendon the insertion is 
the same; namely, the base of the middle phalanx of digits 4 and 5. 

AcTION. The action is the same as that of the communis tendon for the 
fourth and fifth digits. 


35. Extensor carpi ulnaris. 


This strong muscle joins the humerus with the hand and serves to balance 
the action of the radial carpal extensors. 
OricIn. This muscle arises from the lateral epicondyle just radial to the 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 465 


me) 
HH // 


WY 
WI) / 


Wi 
/ j 


} if fv ™ 
a iyyh| AYO 


ake 


Ficure 45. An enlarged view of the volar surface of the right forepaw. The volar pad 
has been removed and the palmaris longus tendon (40) divided. Distally, the palmaris 
longus fascial expansion (palmar fascia) has been reflected radialward to disclose the origin 
of the sublimis muscle (48) for digit 5. Note the continuation of deep muscle fibers from 
the underside of the palmaris longus joining with muscle fibers arising from the deep trans- 
verse carpal ligament to form the sublimis muscle of this fifth digit. Key: 30, brachioradialis ; 
39, flexor carpi ulnaris; 40, palmaris longus; 41, flexor digitorum profundus, tendons from 
the ulnar head; 42, flexor digitorum profundus (humeral head); 43, flexor carpi radialis; 
48, flexor digitorum sublimis for digit 5; 49, abductor digiti quinti; 50, opponens digiti 
quinti; A, transverse carpal ligament; B, pisiform bone. 


466 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


/ 
YL y W) 
Mo) Cs r(\ 
TON 
5 em 


Ficure 46. Enlarged view of volar surface of the right hand. The palmar fascia has 
been completely removed except for the groups of distal fibers which reinforce the sublimi 
tendons. The flexor tendon sheath has been resected a bit distally for digits 2, 3, 4, and 5 
to show the broadening of the sublimis to completely cover the profundus tendon at this 
site. Note again, there is no sublimis tendon for digit 1. The palmaris longus fibers for this 
digit attach to the rim of the flexor tendon sheath. The transverse carpal ligament (A) has 
been divided and reflected to show the origin of the sublimis of digits 2, 3, and 4. The sub- 
limis of digit 5 has been reflected from its origin and displaced ulnaward. Also shown are 
the profundi flexor tendons of all digits and how these tendons arise from the proximal 
musculature. Key: 30, brachioradialis; 39, flexor carpi ulnaris; 41, flexor digitorum pro- 
fundus (ulnar head); 42, flexor digitorum profundus (humeral head); 43, flexor carpi ra- 
dialis; 47, flexor digitorum sublimis (radial) ; 48, flexor digitorum sublimis (ulnar); 49, ab- 
ductor digiti quinti; 50, opponens digiti quinti; A, transverse carpal ligament; B, fibrous 
flexor tendon sheath. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 467 


Ficure 47. Enlarged view of the volar aspect of the right hand. On digit 4 the fibrous 
flexor tendon sheath (A) has been divided along the ulnar margin and reflected radialward 
to show the contents of the flexor tunnel. The concentration of transverse fibers on the 
flexor tendon sheath provides the pulley mechanism of the sheath, thus preventing bow- 
stringing of the flexor tendons when activated. Note the division and rejoining of the sub- 
limis tendon to allow the profundus to come through. The sublimis then continues distally 
to insert in the base of the middle phalanx (B). The profundus flexor tendon continues in 
this sheath to the distal interphalangeal-joint level, inserting at the base of the terminal 
phalanx which is in a hyperextended position at rest. The deep transverse carpal ligament 
(D) has been divided and reflected. This broad ligament has its radial attachment mainly 
to the radial sesamoid and volar wrist joint capsule along the radial side of the navicular- 
lunate bone. On the ulnar side, attachment is mainly along the base of the pisiform with 
attachment also to the wrist joint capsule in the area of the triquetrum. Key: 41, flexor 
digitorum profundus (ulnar head); 42, flexor digitorum profundus (humeral head); 47, 
flexor digiti sublimis (radial) ; 48, flexor digiti sublimis (ulnar of the fifth digit) ; 49, abduc- 
tor digiti quinti; A, transverse carpal ligament; B, fibrous tendon sheath of digit 4, reflected; 
C, insertion of sublimis flexor tendon; D, insertion of profundus flexor tendon. 


468 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


5 em 


Ficure 48. Enlarged ulnar view of the middle and distal phalanges of digit 4 to show 
the hyperextended position of the terminal phalanx and the insertion of the profundus 
flexor tendon. Note the close approximation of the claw to the terminal phalanx. Key: A, 
middle phalanx; B, insertion of profundus flexor tendon on distal phalanx; C, claw. 


origin of the supinator muscle adjacent and distal to the extensor digitorum 
lateralis muscle. The muscle passes along the ulnar border of the dorsum of 
the forearm adjacent to the extensor digitorum lateralis. Near the wrist a 
strong tendon is formed which broadens and passes over the distal ulna with an 
interposed bursa between the tendon and the bone. 

INSERTION. Spanning the carpal area, the tendon continues distally to the 
ulnar side of the base of the fifth metacarpal where it inserts into a slight bony 
protuberance at this site. 

Action. The direct action of this muscle is to ulnaflex the wrist but, if 
this motion is opposed, the action becomes one of dorsiflexion of the wrist joint. 


36. Extensor pollicis et indicis. 


This muscle provides long extensor action for the thumb and an assistance 
to the communis extensor tendon of digit 2. 

OricInN. The muscle arises entirely from the proximal two-thirds of the ulna, 
beginning at the articular notch level and extending distally along the ulnar 
crest. The origin is just posterior to that of the abductor pollicis longus muscle. 
The muscle underlies the extensor digitorum communis muscle and the tendon 
which forms passes through the same compartment at the distal radius as the 
communis tendons. Just distal to the wrist, the tendon divides into two separate 
tendons which continue radiusward. The more radial one goes directly to the 
base of the thumb, the other underlies the communis tendon to reach the ulnar 
side of digit 2. 

INSERTION. The pollicis tendon inserts into the base of the proximal phalanx 
of digit 1 after spreading out somewhat in a hoodlike manner at the metacarpal- 
phalangeal joint level. The indicis tendon, which is approximately twice the 
size of the communis tendon of this digit, joins into the extensor hood on the 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 469 


Ficure 49. Enlarged ulnalateral view of ulna border of the right hand to show relation- 
ship of muscles of tendons about the fifth metacarpal (H). Note insertion of the extensor 
digiti lateralis (34) is mainly into the base of the proximal phalanx, the communis extensor, 
forming the main extensor aponeurosis. Although in close proximity the base of the fifth 
metacarpal does not articulate with the joint surface on the triquetrum but rather more 
radial on the hamate. The pisiform bone has been reflected outward a bit for a cleared view 
of the ulna carpal extensor and flexor tendons. Key: 33, extensor digitorum communis; 
34, extensor digitorum lateralis; 35, extensor carpi ulnaris; 39, flexor carpi ulnaris; 49, ab- 
’ ductor digiti quinti; 50, opponens digiti quinti; 51, flexor digiti quinti brevis; A, proximal 
phalanx; B, insertion of extensor digitorum lateralis; C, sesamoid bone; D, collateral ligament 
at the metacarpal phalangeal joint; E, extensor hood at the metacarpal phalangeal joint; 
F, pisiform; G, triquetrum; H, metacarpal (fifth); U, ulna, distal end. 


ulnar side of the communis tendon, then joins with the communis tendon for 
the remainder of its course. 

Action. The pollicis portion extends the metacarpal-phalangeal joint of 
the thumb and acts as an adductor of the thumb as well. The indicis portion has 
the identical action to that of the comunis tendon of digit 2. 


37. Supinator. 


This deep, somewhat flat forearm muscle joins the humerus to the radius. 

OricIN. Heavy tendinous fibers arise from the small area on the distal 
and most prominent part of the lateral humeral epicondyle just ulnaward of 
the origin of the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle. From its origin the muscle passes 
directly toward the radius and promptly begins its insertion. 

INSERTION. Insertion is into the proximal three-fourths of the radius start- 


470 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 50. Palmar view of the right hand to show specifically the origin and insertion 
of the single lumbricale muscle in this specimen (53). In this plate, the entire flexor sheath 
has been removed from digit 4 and the proximal one-half removed from digit 5. For digit 1, 
the palmar fascia attached to the rim of the flexor sheath has been split and reflected (40). 
Key: 40, palmaris longus; 41, flexor digiti profundus (ulnar head); 42, flexor digiti pro- 
fundus (humeral head) ; 47, flexor digitorum sublimis (radial) ; 48, flexor digitorum sublimis 
(ulnar) ; A, digit 5. 


Vor, XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 471 


5am 


Ficure 51. Enlarged palmar view of right hand. The long digital flexor tendons have 
been reflected distally to show the intrinsic hand muscles grouped about the first and fifth 
metacarpals. These muscles are termed respectively the thenar and hypothenar muscle 
groups. The opponens digiti quinti (50) has been detached from its origin and reflected 
ulnaward. Note absence of an opponens pollicis muscle. The flexor pollicis brevis of digit 
1 (55) has two heads designated as radial and ulnar by their position. A heavy fibrous 
capsule at the wrist joint forms the floor of the carpal tunnel. Key: 39, flexor carpi ulnaris; 
41, flexor digitorum profundus (ulnar head) ; 42, flexor digitorum profundus (humeral head) ; 
49, abductor digiti quinti; 50, opponens digiti quinti; 51, flexor digiti quinti brevis; 52, ad- 
ductor digiti quinti; 53, lumbricali; 54, abductor pollicis brevis; 55, flexor pollicis brevis; 56, 
adductor pollicis; 59, interossei; A, transverse carpal ligament—reflected; B, pisiform bone; 
C, radial sesamoid bone; D, volar capsule of wrist joint; E, proximal phalanx of fifth digit. 


472 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 52. An enlarged radial view of the right first digit to show the relationship of the 
extensor, extrinsic, and intrinsic muscles. Both pollicis and indicis portions of the extensor 
pollicis et indicis tendons are shown. The indicis part lies behind the pollicis tendon. Note 
the more distant extension of the radial fibers of the pollicis tendon at the insertion at the 
base of the proximal phalanx. Note also the location of elastic tissue (dorsal elastic liga- 
ment) which keeps the distal phalanx hyperextended. On voluntary flexion of the distal 
phalanx, the elastic tissue simply stretches. There is no extensor tendon as such inserting 
on the distal phalanx at digit 1 nor on the distal phalanges of the remaining digits. Visible 
in this view is the radial head of the flexor pollicis brevis (55). Key: 36, extensor pollicis 
et indicis; 38, abductor pollicis longus; 42, flexor digitorum profundus (humeral head) ; 54, 
abductor pollicis brevis; 55, flexor pollicis brevis (radial head); A, carpus (multangular) ; 
B, proximal phalanx; C, elastic tissue (dorsal elastic ligament) ; D, sesamoid; R, radius, dis- 
tal end. 


ing on the posterior and lateral aspects at the bicipital tubercle level and termi- 
nating in tendinous fibers at the point of maximum bow of the radius. Thus 
strong mechanical advantage is provided for its action. 

AcTIon. This muscle is a strong supinator of the forearm. 


38. Abductor pollicis longus. 


This deep extensor muscle joins the ulna to the thumb. 

OricIn. This muscle arises from the lateral aspect of the ulna all the way 
from the articular notch to the end of the bone. The origin is adjacent to and 
on the radial side of the extensor pollicis et indicis origin. Some fleshy fibers 
of origin also arise from the proximal interosseus membrane and adjacent op- 
posing surface of the radius. The muscle fibers converge in a triangular con- 
figuration to emerge from under the extensor digitorum communis in the distal 
forearm, where they then pass over the radial carpal extensors toward the radial 
styloid. The tendon now formed passes in the groove of the radius at the radial 
styloid level. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 473 


Ficure 53. Enlarged view of the ulnar side of the right first digit to show the extrinisic 
and intrinsic muscles on this side. The principal insertion of the extensor pollicis (36) is 
into bone somewhat to the ulnar side of the midline space of the proximal phalanx. The radial 
fibers, as noted in figure 52, insert somewhat more distally. Visible in this view is the ulnar 
head of the flexor pollicis brevis (55). Key: 36, extensor pollicis et indicis (pollicis part) ; 
42, flexor digitorum profundus (humeral head); 55, flexor pollicis brevis (ulnar head); 56, 
adductor pollicis; A, metacarpal of digit 1; B, proximal phalanx of digit 1; C, elastic tissue 
(dorsal elastic ligament). 


INSERTION. Emerging from the distal compartment of the radius the tendon 
splits into a lesser one-fourth which inserts volarly into the radial sesamoid, 
and a greater three-fourths which inserts into a bony tubercle to the radial side 
of the dorsum of the base of the first metacarpal. 

AcTIon. By virtue of its insertion this muscle acts to abduct the thumb 
metacarpal, and also to radiflex the wrist to some degree. Like other extensor 
musculature it can assist in supination of the forearm. 


39. Flexor carpi ulnaris. 


This large strong muscle occupies the ulnar side of the volar surface of the 
forearm and lies adjacent to the palmaris longus muscle. It extends from the el- 
bow area to the hand. 

Oricin. Arising by muscular tendinous fibers from the medial surface of 
the lower part of the olecranon crest the origin just overlies the origin of the 
ulnar head of the flexor profundus digitorum muscles with a few fibers seem- 
ingly in common. Other but lesser fleshy fibers arise from the adjacent medial 
aspéct of the olecranon and over the joint capsule in this area, and a few from 
the humerus along the articular ridge of the medial condyle. The muscle is 
elongated, fusiform in type, and in its course down the forearm it overlies all 
but the proximal part of the flexor digitorum profundus (ulnar head). The 


474 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


ye 


Syeelad 


Ficure 54. An enlarged radiolateral view of digit 5 to show insertion of extensor digi- 
torum communis (33) at the base of the middle phalanx. The elastic tissue at distal joint 
level has been reflected from its attachment to the middle phalanx, thus allowing the distal 
joint to assume a more flexed position. Insertions of the intrinsic musculature on the radial 
side of digit 5 are shown. Key: 33, extensor digitorum communis; 41, flexor digitorum 
profundus (ulnar head); 50, opponens digiti quinti; 51, flexor digiti quinti brevis; 52, ad- 
ductor digiti quinti; A, metacarpal of digit 5; B, proximal phalanx; C, elastic tissue (dorsal 
elastic ligament). 


tendon of insertion begins to appear about halfway down the muscle. The mus- 
cle fibers continue as far distally as the pisiform bone. 

INSERTION. At the carpal level the tendon inserts into and encompasses 
the pisiform bone but continues to pass deeply into the palm to its final inser- 
tion at the volar surface of the base of the fifth metacarpal bone. 

Action. This muscle is a strong volar flexor of the wrist and gives ulna- 
flexion of the wrist as well. 


40. Palmaris longus. 


This is the most prominent muscle on the volar surface of the forearm. It 
is a large, broad, flat muscle which lies superficially adjacent to the flexor carpi 
ulnaris and connects the humerus with the hand. A tendinous surface presents 
on the distal two-thirds of the muscle. 

OricIn. Arising as the outermost muscle from the distal three-fourths of 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 475 


Siem 

Ficure 55. An enlarged palmar (volar) view of the right hand with all muscles and ten- 

dons removed except for the abductor (57) and adductor (58) digiti secundus and the three 

interossei (59). The interossei constitute the deepest layer of muscles, as the abductor and 

adductor digiti secundi lie a bit superficial to them. Key: 57, abductor digiti secundi; 58, 

adductor digiti secundi; 59, interossei; A, metacarpal, digit 5; B, head of fourth metacarpal; 
C, pisiform bone; D, transverse carpal ligament—cut and reflected. 


the medial epicondyle, the origin overlies the distal one-half of the origin of the 
pronator teres muscle. Tendinous fibers appear the width of the muscle at the 
junction of the proximal and middle thirds, and continue distally as a broad 
tendinous sheath to the wrist. The superficial fibers spread out over the palm 
forming a dense palmar fascia. Connective tissue fibers from this fascia extend 


476 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 56. A radiolateral view of digit 4 of the right hand to show the pattern of in- 
sertion of all interossei muscles except the one to the radial side of digit 2. Note how the 
flat interosseus tendon joins the extensor aponeurosis at the extensor hood level overlying 
the metacarpal phalangeal joint. The anatomical relationship of the long extensor probably 
allows the interossei to extend the proximal interphalangeal joint when the metacarpal 
phalangeal joint is in hyperextension. It appears that the hood mechanism probably checks 
the excursion of the long extensor thus limiting its action on the proximal interphalangeal 
joint when in the hyperextended position. Key: 33, extensor digitorum communis; 44, flexor 
digitorum profundus; 47, flexor digitorum sublimis; 59, interosseus; A, extensor hood; B, 
extensor aponeurosis; C, elastic tissue (dorsal elastic ligament); D, metacarpal of digit 4. 


into the pads of the palm and the digits. The dense palmar fascia shows three 
major fibrous bands extending toward the bases of digits 2, 3, and 4, with lesser 
concentrations of fibers passing toward the bases of digits 1 and 5. Fibrous 
extensions of the palmar fascia also pass deeply into the palm forming septum- 
like structures which attach to the fibrous flexor tendon sheaths on either side 
of the metacarpal heads. The interval between the metacarpal heads becomes 
a hiatus through which the volar digital nerves and vessels pass into the digits. 
When the palmaris longus muscle is divided just above the wrist and the distal 
portion reflected, the undersurface can be observed. Here it is noted that toward 
the ulnar side at wrist level muscle fibers continue and separate from the main 
more superficial tendinous portion. These muscle fibers are now joined by ad- 
ditional muscle fibers arising from the deep transverse carpal ligament. This 
combined muscle shortly terminates in a small discreet tendon which then 
promptly splits into two halves which enter the fibrous flexor tendon sheath 
of digit 5 as a sublimis tendon. At its point of entry, this small tendon is rein- 
forced by main fibers from the palmar fascia. The palmar fascia proper, which 
spreads over the palm with the concentration of fibers and bands towards the 
digits 2, 3, and 4, shows these bands attaching to the fibrous flexor sheath and 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 477 


\ 
= a 
. CaaS 
J = PIE, A 
a) ee e os ? Me 
“ deren seen 


Hiem 


Ficure 57. Skull, right lateral view. Key: 3, clavotrapezius (origin); 8, rhomboideus 
capitis (origin); A, lamboidal crest; B, mastoid process. 


entering the sheath to reinforce the respective sublimi tendons to these digits. 
For the thumb, the lesser fibrous band simply attaches to the fibrous flexor 
digital sheath as there is no sublimis tendon for this digit. 

INSERTION. As noted from the description above, the palmaris longus mus- 
cle has three functions; namely, cupping of the palm by tensing the palmar fas- 
cia, volar flexion of the wrist, and reinforcing the flexor sublimi tendons which 
flex the proximal interphalangeal joints of digits 2, 3, 4, and 5. 


41. Flexor digitorum profundus (ulnar head). 


This muscle represents part of the profundus flexor mechanism of the digits. 
The remaining part is the flexor digitorum profundus, humeral head and central 
head. 

OricIn. Musculotendinous fibers arise from the medial olecranon ridge 
beneath the origin of the flexor carpi ulnaris with additional fleshy fibers of 
origin continuing distally from the medial surface of the ulna in its upper half 
tapering along the ulna crest. Tendon fibers begin to appear in the lower half 
of the muscle but muscle fibers continue as far distally as the wrist. Slightly 
above wrist level, junction occurs with the humeral and central heads with five 
resulting strong tendons which pass through the carpal tunnel under the deep 
transverse carpal ligament and then pass one to each digit. It is to be noted that 
the contribution from the ulnar head makes up the tendons for digits 4 and 5. 


478 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


: 5lcimn 


Ficure 58. Skull, volar view. Key: 4, cleidomastoideus (origin) ; A, mastoid process. 


INSERTION. Flexor profundus tendons of digits 4 and 5 enter the fibrous 
flexor tendon sheath of the metacarpal-head level passing through a split of the 
flexor sublimis tendon in the proximal phalanx area, the tendon continues dis- 
tally in its sheath to its insertion on the volar surface of the base of the termi- 
nal or distal phalanx. 

Action. The profundus tendon flexes the terminal finger joint and all proxi- 
mal finger joints as well. 


42. Flexor digitorum profundus (humeral head). 


This is a strong centrally placed forearm muscle connecting the humerus 
with the digits. It is part of the profundus flexor mechanism. 

OriciIn. Tendinous and muscular fibers arise from the medial humeral 
epicondyle under the distal one-half of the origin of the palmaris longus muscle 
and just distal to the origin of the flexor carpi radialis muscle. In the forearm, 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 479 


Seen 


Ficure 59. Atlas, volar view. Key: 6, omotrachleon (origin); 9, rhomboideus pro- 
fundus (origin); A, transverse process; B, anterior tubercle. 


the muscle lies between the flexor digitorum profundus (ulnar head) and the 
flexor carpi radialis. Insertional tendon begins to develop about halfway to 
the wrist and, at wrist level, junction with the ulnar and central heads occurs 
and the five resulting tendons pass through the carpal tunnel and on to the 
digits. The humeral head contributes to the tendons of digits 1, 2, and 3. 

INSERTION. The profundus tendons of digits 2 and 3 insert as described 
for those of digits 4 and 5. For the thumb, a similar fibrous flexor tendon 
sheath is present but there is no sublimis tendon and only two phalanges. In- 
sertion is into the base of the terminal phalanx on its volar surface. 

AcTION. The profundus tendon flexes the distal joint of the digits and all 
proximal digital joints as well. 


43. Flexor carpi radialis. 


This strong muscle with tendinous fibers at each end connects the humerus 
to the hand. 

OrIGIN. The heavy tendinous fibers of origin arise from the medial humeral 
epicondyle under the proximal one-half of the origin of the palmaris longus mus- 
cle and adjacent to the origin of the humeral head of the flexor digitorum pro- 
fundus muscle. The flexor carpi radialis is fusiform in shape and passes down 
the volar aspect of the forearm under the palmaris longus muscle and adjacent 
to the humeral head of the flexor digitorum profundus. At wrist level, a heavy 


480 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


yA / 
9 ZH fe ff c 
io | / 
G / 
iB, ff Y, vf. 
Z| / Ly) 
Ep] / / 
| // / @ 
8 f eg eae / / H 
tu / 
g D SS ea eae ESR REE / / / TA, 
ty / : 
if a ee Sees Af 
| sie as < Fn S| 17) 
Va 
7 


Ficure 60. Right scapula, lateral surface. Key: 16, teres major (origin); 17, acro- 
miodeltoideus (origin); 18, spinodeltoideus (origin); 19, dorsoepitrochlearis (origin); 24, 
infraspinatus (origin); 26, supraspinatus (origin); 28, biceps brachii (origin); 1, spino- 
trapezius (insertion); 2, acromiotrapezius (insertion); 6, omotrachleon (insertion); 7, 
rhomboideus major (insertion); 8, rhomboideus capitis (insertion); 9, rhomboideus pro- 
fundus (insertion) ; A, axillary border of scapula; B, vertebral border of scapula; C, supe- 
rior border of scapula; D, superior angle of scapula; E, inferior angle of scapula; F, spine 
of scapula; G, tuberosity of scapular spine; H, glenoid surface; I, acromion process. 


tendon forms which ‘passes to the ulnar side of the radial sesamoid and dips 
deeply into the palm. 
INSERTION. This tendon inserts on the volar surface of the base of meta- 


carpal 2. 
ActTIon. Strong palmar flexion of the wrist results from a pull on this ten- 


don. 


44. Pronator teres. 


This is a strong thick muscle passing from the medial side of the distal hu- 
merus to the radius. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 481 


Bem 


Ficure 61. Right scapula, medial surface. Key: 22, triceps brachii caput medialis 
(origin); 27, subscapularis (origin); 28, biceps brachii (origin); 10, serratus magnus 
(insertion) ; 11, levator anguli scapulae (insertion); A, glenoid; B, supraglenoid tubercle. 


OrIcIN. This muscle is the most proximal of those arising from the medial 
humeral epicondyle, but the distal one-half of the origin underlies the origin 
of the flexor carpi radialis. Arising mostly by tendinous fibers, this muscle 
diagonally crosses the upper forearm and spreads out as it approaches the ra- 
dius. 

INSERTION. Starting along the radial margin of the ridge of the radius, 
the insertion continues distally the full length of the bone. Tendinous fibers 
make up the insertion for the most part, with a heavy concentration of fibers 
at the maximum bow of the radius where the insertion comes in close relation- 
ship to the insertion of the supinator muscle. Tendinous fibers continue in lesser 
concentration along the distal radius to the volar aspect of the radial styloid 
where they lie adjacent to the insertion of the brachioradialis muscle. 

Action. As an antagonist to supination, this muscle is a strong pronator 
of the forearm. 


45. Flexor digitorum profundus (central head). 


The deepest of the flexor profundus group, this muscle is roughly Y-shaped 
and arises in the upper forearm to join with the ulnar and humeral heads of the 
flexor digitorum profundus to give flexor action to the digits. 

OrIGIN. There are three areas of origin of this muscle. The ulnar portion 
arises as fleshy fibers from the anteromedial surface of the upper two-thirds 


482 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


C 


; Cin = 
Ficure 62. Right scapula, glenoid view. Key: 28, biceps brachii (origin); A, glenoid; 
B, superior angle of scapula; C, inferior angle of scapula; D, acromion process. 


of the ulna. The origin starts near the articular lip of the ulna and adjacent and 
lateral to the tendons of insertion of the brachialis and pectoantebrachialis 
muscles. The radial portion arises from the anteromedial surface of the upper 
two-thirds of the radius, starting near the articular rim at the neck of the radius 
and just lateral to the bicipital tubercle. The interosseus portion arises from 
the volar surface of the interosseus membrane between the radius and the ulna, 
at the upper margin of the membrane. The muscle thus formed is flat and under- 
lies the other profundi musculature which it joins from the underside at the 
level where the tendons begin to form. Distally, the flexor profundus muscula- 
ture overlies the pronator quadratus muscle. 

INSERTION. The muscle fibers join into the flexor digitorum profundus 
(central and ulnar heads) which contributes to the tendons formed and there- 
fore has a common insertion with them. 


VoL. XXXTIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 483 


Ficure 63. Right humerus, posterior view. Key: 21, triceps brachii caput lateralis 
(origin); 29, brachialis (origin); 30, brachioradialis (origin); 31, extensor carpi radi- 
alis longus (origin); 32, extensor carpi radialis brevis (origin); 33, extensor digitorum 
communis (origin); 34, extensor digitorum lateralis (origin); 35, extensor carpi ulnaris 
(origin) ; 37, supinator (origin); 5, clavobrachialis (insertion) ; 13, pectoralis major (inser- 
tion); 17, acromiodeltoideus (insertion); 18, spinodeltoideus (insertion); 24, infraspinatus 
(insertion) ; 26, supraspinatus (insertion); A, head of humerus; B, greater tuberosity; C, 
pectoral ridge; D, deltoid ridge; E, lateral epicondyle; F, lateral epicondylar ridge. 


484 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


46. Pronator quadratus. 


This muscle is flat and thin with fibers running transversely. It lies in the 
distal forearm connecting the radius and ulna. 

OricIn. Fleshy and tendinous fibers arise from the distal one-third of the 
medial surface of the ulna. From its origin, the muscle fibers pass directly 
transversely to the radius maintaining full width of the muscle. 

INSERTION. Fleshy and tendinous fibers insert into the distal one-fourth 
of the volar surface of the radius adjacent to the lower part of the insertion of 
the pronator teres muscle. 

AcTION. Pronation of the forearm is accomplished by this muscle. 


47 and 48. Flexor digitorum sublimis. 


There are four small flexor sublimi tendons, one each for digits 2, 3, 4, and 
5. Digit 1 is without a sublimis tendon. The flexor sublimis of digit 5 has been 
previously described under the palmaris longus muscle. 

OricIn. The flexor sublimis tendons for digits 2, 3, and 4, arise from the 
volar surface of the flexor digitorum profundus complex just proximal to the 
wrist. The sublimis for digit 4 comes from the ulnar head, those for digits 2 
and 3 from the humeral head. Because of their origin and position in the hand, 
they have been grouped as (47) flexor digitorum sublimis (radial) for digits 
2 and 3, and (48) flexor digitorum sublimis (ulnaris) for digits 4 and 5. 

INSERTION. The sublimis tendons of digits 2, 3, 4, and 5 enter the digital 
fibrous flexor tendon sheaths superficially to the profundus flexor tendons. At 
this point, each is strongly reinforced by palmar fascia fibers to form a wide 
flat tendon overlying and completely covering the profundus tendon. After a 
short distance within the sheaths, the sublimis tendons abruptly split longi- 
tudinally and curve around on either side of the profundus to rejoin into a thin 
but broad tendon which hugs the proximal phalanx forming the back wall of the 
flexor sheaths. The sublimi tendons continue distally across the proximal inter- 
phalangeal joint to a broad insertion on the volar lip of the proximal end of 
the middle phalanx. 

Action. The sublimi tendons act to flex the proximal interphalangeal joints 
of digits 2, 3, 4, and 5. In view of their origin, those of digits 2, 3, and 4 must 
function in relation to the profundus flexor tendons. For digit 5, the anatomy 
would allow for some independent flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint. 
The broad spread of the sublimis tendons at metacarpal-phalangeal joint 
level could also serve as a pulley mechanism for the profundi tendons. 


THE INTRINSIC MUSCEES OF THE HAND 


A group of small muscles within the hand proper have been termed intrinsic 
hand muscles. In view of their size, these muscles are not strong but they serve 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 485 


a most important function in balancing the action of the long forearm flexor 
and extensor musculature. These muscles, also, can provide the fine skill motion 
of the digits. This latter function can hardly be recognized in the sea otter as 
the digits are in the state of syndactyly and the thumb is unopposable. 

For descriptive purposes, these intrinsic muscles can be grouped as fol- 
lows. Those about the first ray are called the thenar intrinsic muscles. Those 
about the fifth ray are called the hypothenar intrinsic muscles. The remaining 
small muscles consist of the interossei, one each for the second, third, and fourth 
digits, and two accessory intrinsic muscles for digit 2. 

Also, the lumbrical muscle is generally considered an intrinsic muscle, al- 
though its origin is from the flexor digitorum profundus group of tendons. 


THE HYyPpoTHENAR GROUP OF INTRINSIC HAND MUSCLES 


49. Abductor digiti quinti. 


This is a rather large coarse muscle forming the ulnar border of the hand. 

OricIn. Fleshy fibers arise from a triangular area on the distal surface of 
the pisiform bone. The muscle becomes spindle-shaped passing distally. 

INSERTION. The insertion is through a sesamoid bone into the ulnar volar 
aspect of the base of the proximal phalanx. 

Action. This muscle flexes the metacarpal phalangeal joint of digit 5 and 
would also serve to abduct the extended digit within its anatomical limits. 


50. Opponens digiti quinti. 

This is a superficial slender fusiform muscle of the hypothenar group. 

OricIn. Fleshy and tendinous fibers arise from the ulnar side of the deep 
carpal ligament to form the thin muscle which first overrides the long flexors 
of the fifth digit, then passes more deeply into the palm on a slightly oblique 
course to overlie the adductor and flexor digiti quinti. At the metacarpal phalan- 
geal joint level a small thin tendon forms. 

INSERTION. The insertion is into the volar aspect of the base of the proximal 
phalanx of digit 5 just to the ulnar side of the tendinous insertion of the adduc- 
tor digiti quinti. 

Action. The position of this muscle would provide slight opposition action 
to the fifth ray if such were possible. The muscle probably serves to assist in 
independent flexion of the metacarpal-phalangeal joint. 


51. Flexor digiti quinti brevis. 


This muscle is small and deep in the palm, being in the general plane of the 
interossei muscles of the adjacent digits. 

OricIn. This muscle arises from the fibrous capsule of the wrist joint to 
the ulnar side of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon. A fusiform muscle is formed 
which passes directly to the radial side of digit 5 where a small tendon forms. 


486 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


INSERTION. This small tendon inserts into the base of the proximal phalanx 
and on the radial side dorsal to the insertion of the adductor and opponens mus- 
cles. 

AcTIoN. Flexion of the metacarpal-phalangeal joint of the fifth digit is 
accomplished by this muscle and also some degree of adduction. 


52. Adductor digiti quinti. 


This flat triangular muscle is the next most superficial of the hypothenar 
group. 

OricIn. Fleshy fibers arise over a broad area of the volar fibrous wrist- 
joint capsule adjacent to and on the ulnar side of the origin of the adductor 
pollicis and extend ulnaward to the margin of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon. 
The muscle from its origin triangulates distally and obliquely toward the base 
of the proximal phalanx of the fifth digit. 

INSERTION. A short tendon arises which inserts into the base of the proxi- 
mal phalanx on the ulnar side just radial to the opponens digiti quinti and over- 
lying the insertion of the flexor digiti quinti brevis. 

AcTIoNn. The action of this muscle is to adduct the fifth digit and also to 
assist in flexion of the metacarpal-phalangeal joint. 


THE LUMBRICAL MUSCLE 


53. Lumbricali. 


This small intrinsic hand muscle differs from the other by virtue of its origin. 

OriciIn. Arising from the opposed surfaces of the profundus flexor tendons 
of digits 3 and 4 in the proximal palm, the fleshy fibers form a short slim muscle 
which traverses the palm partly by a very thin tendon which passes to the radial 
side of digit 4. 

INSERTION. This small tendon inserts into the radial side of the proximal 
phalanx of digit 4 just distal to the joint surface. The tendon fibers terminate 
into the periosteum and bone rather than entering into the extensor aponeuro- 
sis. 

AcTION. Owing to its site of insertion, the muscle gives radiolateral motion 
of the metacarpal-phalangeal joint and also flexion of this joint. 

Notes. The number of lumbrical muscles is variable. In another specimen 
three lumbrical muscles were noted. 


THe THENAR INTRINSIC MUSCLES 


54. Abductor pollicis brevis. 


This is a small fusiform muscle on the radial side of digit 1. 
Oricin. Fleshy fibers arise, half from the radial sesamoid and half from 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 487 


the adjacent deep carpal ligament to form a small muscle which passes along 
the radial side of the metacarpal adjacent to the radial portion of the flexor 
pollicis brevis. 

INSERTION. This small muscle terminates distally in a tendon which joins 
with the tendon of the radial part of the flexor pollicis brevis to insert in the 
radial volar side of the base of the proximal phalanx through a sesamoid bone. 

Action. The principle action is flexion of the metacarpal-phalangeal joint 
of digit 1. A minor degree of abduction is probably also obtained. 


55. Flexor pollicis brevis. 


This muscle, which divides near its insertion, is the deepest of the thenar 
group. 

OrIGIN. Fleshy fibers arise from the volar fibrous wrist joint capsule between 
the origin of the adductor pollicis and the abductor pollicis brevis. The muscle 
then passes distally overlying the proximal area of the metacarpal of digit 1. 
The muscle then divides into radial and ulnar halves. The terminal tendon of 
each half inserts into the base of the proximal phalanx, the radial half through 
the sesamoid with a tendon of the short abductor, the ulnar half with the tendon 
of the adductor pollicis. 

AcTIon. Both halves serve as flexors of the metacarpal-phalangeal joint 
of digit 1. 


56. Adductor pollicis. 


This muscle is the largest of the thenar group. 

OriIGIN. Fleshy fibers arise from the volar fibrous capsule of the wrist joint 
between the origin of the flexor pollicis brevis on the radial side and the adduc- 
tor digiti quinti on the ulnar side. The origin of this muscle overlies the origin 
of the deeper intrinsic muscles of the second digit. The muscle thus formed 
courses obliquely radiusward across the palm to the ulnar side of the proximal 
phalanx of digit 1. 

INSERTION. The short flat tendon which forms overrides but joins with the 
tendon of the ulnar part of the flexor pollicis brevis to insert on the ulnar volar 
lateral aspect of the proximal phalanx of digit 1. 

Action. This muscle will adduct and flex the metacarpal-phalangeal joint 
of digit 1. 


THE AccEssoRY INTRINSIC MUSCLES OF DIGIT 2 


57. Abductor digiti secundi. 


This muscle is a short, somewhat thick, muscle which overlies the interossei 
musculature. 
OrIcIN. Fleshy fibers arise from the volar surface of the base of metacarpal 


488 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


1. The muscle then passes slightly obliquely across the thumb web to the radial 
side of the base of the proximal phalanx of digit 2. 

INSERTION. Tendinous fibers developing at this level have a dual insertion. 
The more superficial fibers form a sheetlike aponeurosis which passes dorsally 
into the extensor hood and dorsal extensor aponeurosis. The deeper fibers join 
with the tendon at the radial part of the interosseus muscle for this digit and in- 
sert through a sesamoid bone into the base of the radial side of the proximal 
phalanx. 

AcTIon. The more superficial fibers which join with the extensor aponeuro- 
sis act to extend the proximal interphalangeal joint and to flex the metacarpal- 
phalangeal joint. The deeper fibers serve to radialflex the metacarpal-phalan- 
geal joint. 


58. Adductor digiti secundi. 


This slender fusiform muscle lies in the same plane with the abductor digiti 
secundi and also overlies the deeper interossei muscles. 

OricIn. Fleshy fibers arise from a small area of fibrous capsule at the base 
of metacarpal 3 slightly proximal and to the ulnar side of the origin of the inter- 
osseus of digit 2. The muscle then passes slightly obliquely and distally to the 
ulnar side of digit 2 where a short tendon develops. 

INSERTION. At the metacarpal-phalangeal joint level the tendon passes 
close to the volar plate and sesamoid bone and volar to the tendon of the ulnar 
half of the interosseus muscle of this digit. The insertion is into the base of the 
proximal phalanx on the ulnar side. 

AcTIoN. This muscle would adduct digit 2 at the metacarpal-phalangeal 
joint level and also assist in flexion of this joint. 


THE INTEROSSEI MUSCLES 


59. Interossei. 


These muscles, three in number, are the deepest intrinsic muscles of the 
hand. They are short and thick and somewhat fusiform in shape. Each muscle 
divides about halfway from its origin into radial and ulnar halves which then 
pass to the respective sides of each digit at metacarpal-phalangeal joint level. 

OricIN. All interossei muscles arise as fleshy fibers from the volar aspect 
of the fibrous capsule at the base of the metacarpals. Interosseus 2 between 
metacarpals 2 and 3, interosseus 3 at the base of metacarpal 3, and interosseus 
4 at the base of metacarpal 4. The ulnar half of interosseus 4 is the largest of 
the interossei divisions and shows a slight tendency toward further division in 
its distal one-third. 

INSERTION. With the exception of the radial half of interosseus 2, all inter- 
ossei form flattened tendons passing close to the volar plate at metacarpal- 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 489 


Siem 


Ficure 64. Right humerus, lateral view. Key: 29, brachialis (origin); 31, exten- 
sor carpi radialis longus (origin); 32, extensor carpi radialis brevis (origin); 33, exten- 
sor digitorum communis (origin); 34, extensor digitorum lateralis (origin); 35, extensor 
carpi ulnaris (origin); 37, supinator (origin); 40, palmaris longus (origin); 42, flexor 
digitorum profundus (humeral head—origin); 43, flexor carpi radialis (origin); 44, 
pronator teres (origin); 5, clavobrachialis (insertion); 13, pectoralis major (insertion) ; 
14, pectoralis minor (insertion) ; 15, latissimus dorsi (insertion) ; 16, teres major (insertion) ; 
26, supraspinatus (insertion) ; 27, subscapularis (insertion) ; A, head of humerus; B, greater 
tuberosity; C, pectoral ridge; D, deltoid ridge; E, lateral epicondyle; F, lateral epicondylar 
ridge; G, medial epicondyle; H, lesser tuberosity. 


490 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 65. Right humerus, anterior view. Key: 22, triceps brachii caput medialis 
(two of three sites of origin); 40, palmaris longus (origin); 42, flexor digitorum pro- 
fundus (humeral head—origin); 43, flexor carpi radialis (origin); 44, pronator teres 
(origin) ; 13, pectoralis major (insertion); 14, pectoralis minor (insertion); 15, latissimus 
dorsi (insertion) ; 16, teres major (insertion); A, head of humerus; B, greater tuberosity; 
C, pectoral ridge; D, medial epicondyle; E, lesser tuberosity; F, medial epicondylar ridge. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 491 


Ficure 66. Right humerus, medial view. Key: 22, triceps brachii caput medialis 
(origin) ; 23, anconeus externus (origin); 29, brachialis (origin); 27, subscapularis (inser- 
tion) ; A, head of humerus; B, lesser tuberosity; C, medial epicondyle; D, medial epicondy- 
lar foramen; E, lateral epicondylar ridge. 


492 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


\\ 


4 


= Eh SGA 


TLL EEE 


C4 
Deen 


Ficure 67. Right ulna and radius, posterior view. Key: 45, flexor digitorum profun- 
dus (humeral head—origin) ; 19, dorsoepitrochlearis (insertion) ; 20, triceps brachii caput 
longus (insertion); 21, triceps brachii caput lateralis (insertion); 22, triceps brachii caput 
medialis (insertion) ; 30, brachioradialis (insertion) ; 37, supinator (insertion); A, olecranon 
process of ulna; B, semilunar notch; C, styloid process; D, radial styloid; E, biceps tubercle 
of radius; F, head of radius. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 493 


A 


12 | PY xe — B 


Ficure 68. Right ulna and radius, lateral view. Key: 36, extensor pollicis et indicis 
longus (origin); 38, abductor pollicis longus (origin); 12, pectoantebrachialis (into fas- 
cia—insertion) ; 20, triceps brachii caput longus (insertion) ; 21, triceps brachii caput lateralis 
(insertion) ; 22, triceps brachii caput medialis (insertion) ; 23, anconeus externus (insertion) ; 
28, biceps brachii (insertion); 30, brachioradialis (insertion); 37, supinator (insertion) ; 
44, pronator teres (insertion); A, olecranon process, ulna; B, semilunar notch; C, styloid 
process, ulna; D, styloid process, radius; E, bicipital tuberosity; F, head of radius. 


494 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Kae wm 


Ficure 69. Right ulna and radius, anterior view. Key: 5, clavobrachialis (insertion) ; 
12, pectoantebrachialis (insertion) ; 22, triceps brachii caput medialis (insertion) ; 23, anco- 
neus externus (insertion); 28, biceps brachii (insertion); 29, brachialis (insertion); 30, 
brachioradialis (insertion) ; 44, pronator teres (insertion); A, olecranon process, ulna; B, 
semilunar notch; C, styloid process, ulna; D, styloid process, radius; E, bicipital tuberosity ; 
F, head of radius. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 495 


SMmeenas 


Ficure 70. Right ulna and radius, medial view. Key: 39, flexor carpi ulnaris (ori- 
gin) ; 45, flexor digitorum profundus (central head—origin) ; 5, clavobrachialis (insertion) ; 
12, pectoantebrachialis (insertion) ; 20, triceps brachii caput longus (insertion); 22, triceps 
brachii caput medialis (insertion) ; 28, biceps brachii (insertion) ; 29, brachialis (insertion) ; 
A, olecranon process, ulna; B, semilunar notch, ulna; C, articular surface for ulna; D, bi- 
cipital tubercle, radius; E, radial head. 


496 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Senn 


Ficure 71. Right ulna and radius, articulated, anterior view. Key: 45, flexor digi- 
torum profundus (central head—origin) ; 46, pronator quadratus (origin); 5, clavobrachi- 
alis (insertion) ; 12, pectoantebrachialis (insertion) ; 28, biceps brachii (insertion) ; 29, brachi- 
alis (insertion) ; 30, brachioradialis (insertion) ; 44, pronator teres (insertion); 46, pronator 
quadratus (insertion); A, olecranon process, ulna; B, semilunar notch, ulna; C, styloid 
process, ulna; D, interosseus membrane. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 497 


—— 
FULD 


CUBRUUURNDUNUKHREATERERSRNT 


Ave) 


ae 


D S74) 


. olen é 
Ficure 72. Right ulna and radius, articulated, posterior view. Key: 36, extensor 
pollicis et indicis longus (origin); 38, abductor pollicis longus (origin); 37, supinator 
(insertion) ; A, olecranon process, ulna; B, head of radius; C, styloid process, radius; D, 
styloid process, ulna. 


498 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


phalangeal joint level and then, as aponeurotic sheets, join into the extensor 
hood and extensor aponeurosis of each digit forming the lateral band of the ex- 
tensor aponeurosis. At the proximal interphalangeal joint level, these lateral 
bands and extensor aponeuroses terminate into the central extensor tendon to 
insert into the dorsum at the base of the middle phalanx. The extensor tendon 
structures do not continue to the terminal phalanx as might be expected. The 
tendon of the radial half of the interosseus 2 joins with the tendon of the ab- 
ductor digiti secundi to insert through a sesamoid into the base of the proximal 
phalanx as previously described. 

AcTION. The interossei tendons joining into the extensor aponeurosis serve 
to balance the action between the long extensor and flexors of these digits. Act- 
ing alone, they would impart lateral motion to the extended digits or serve to 
flex independently the metacarpal-phalangeal joints. With the metacarpal- 
phalangeal joints in hyperextension, they would also act to extend the proximal 
interphalangeal joints. In this way, the balancing effect prevents deformity 
from action of the long extensors and flexor tendons alone. 


MUSCLE ORIGINS AND INSERTIONS 


In viewing the origin and insertion of the muscles as shown in the skeletal 
figures, some confusion may arise owing to the bowing and torsion of the long 
bones, particularly the humerus. The views as described of each plate are based 
on the proximal ends of the bones. For example, a posterior view of the proximal 
end of the humerus gives, as a result of torsion of this bone, a lateral view of 
the distal end. 

Each muscle retains its individual number and, therefore, to distinguish 
between origin and insertion a circled number means the area of origin and an 
uncircled number means the area of insertion. 

The bones of the forefoot are not shown, as tendon insertions only are present 
and these areas of insertion are shown quite adequately on the muscle plates. 


SUMMARY 


The gross muscular anatomy of the forelimb of the sea otter has been pre- 
sented. For the hand the intrinsic and extrinsic musculature is sufficient to 
provide for dexterity, but such is extremely limited by reason of the anatomical 
restrictions imposed by the integument and soft parts. 

The forefoot, obviously designed for terrestrial use, has become, by virtue 
of bimanual use, a highly skilled appendage for other purposes. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


The State of California Deparment of Fish and Game was most cooperative 
in providing the specimen for anatomical study. The California Academy of 
Sciences provided the invaluable aid of a disarticulated sea otter skeleton. 


VoL. XXXIX] HOWARD: SEA OTTER FORELIMB 499 


The Anatomical Studies of the California River Otter, by Edna M. Fisher, 
proved to be an excellent guide during the dissection, and her unpublished notes 
on the sea otter anatomy, which were made available through the courtesy of 
Mr. Fred Tarasoff, were also of value. Unpublished notes and sketches by Fred 
Tarasoff were also available and of some assistance. 

The dissection and storage of materials took place at the Hopkins Marine 
Station of Stanford University in Pacific Grove, California, and the personnel 
of this institution, particularly Dr. I. Abbott, gave encouragement and assistance 
in every way possible for which I am deeply indebted. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


BarABASH-NIKIFoROV, I. I. 
1962. The sea otter (Enhydra lutris L.). Biology and economic problems of breeding. 
Translated from the Russian by the Israeli Program for Scientific Translations. 
National Science Foundation and U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, 
DEC 227 pages: 
FIisHER, Epna M. 
1939. Habits of the southern sea otter. Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 
21-36. 
1942. Osteology and myology of the California river otter. Stanford University Press, 
Stanford, California, vi + 66 pages. 
—. Notes and sketches on the myology of the southern sea otter. (Unpublished). 
Courtesy of Fred Tarasoff. 


GoLp_ER, F. A. 
1925. Bering’s voyages. American Geographical Society, Research Series, no. 2, 290 
pages. 


GRINNELL, J., JosEpH S. Dixon, and JEAN M. LINSDALE 
1937. Fur bearing mammals of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, 
California, 777 pages. 
Hart, E. R. 
1926. Muscular anatomy of three mustelid mammals, Mephitis, Spilogale, and Martes. 
University of California Publications in Zoology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 7-38. 
VAT Kee I: 
1963. Tool-using performances as indicators of behavioral adaptability. Current 
Anthropology, vol. 4, December, pp. 479-494. 
Harris, C. J. 
1968. Otters: a study of the recent Lutrinae. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 397 
pages. 
Howe tt, A. B. 
1930. Aquatic mammals. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, and Baltimore, 
Maryland, xii + 338 pages. 
JoLuie, M. 
1962. Chordate morphology. Reinhold, New York, 478 pages. 
Jacosi, A. 
1938. Der Seeotter. Monographien der Wildsaugetiere, Band VI, 93 pages. (Transla- 
tion: Fisheries Research Board of Canada, no. 521.) 


500 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Kenyon, K. W. 

1969. The sea otter in the eastern Pacific Ocean. North American Fauna, no. 68, U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Washing- 
ton, 352 pp. 

Murtg, O. J. 

1940. Notes on the sea otter. Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 119-131. 
Orre RT: 

1966. Vertebrate biology (second edition). W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, xii ++ 


483 pages. 
Romer, A. S. 
1964. The vertebrate body. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia and London, viii + 
643 pages. 


Soxotov, A. S., and J. I. SoxoLov 
1970. Some specific features of the locomotor organs of the river otter and sea otter 
associated with their mode of life. Moscovskoe Obshchestvo Ispytatelel Prirody, 
Otdel Biologicheskii, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 5-17. (Translated from the Russian, 
Hopkins Marine Station, Pacific Grove, California, 1972.) 
TayLor, W. P. 
1914. The problem of aquatic adaptation in the Carnivora, as illustrated in the oste- 
ology and evolution of the sea otter. University of California Publications, Bul- 
letin of the Department of Geology, vol. 7, no. 25, pp. 465-495. 
TarASoFF, F. J. 
. Notes and sketches on the myology of the sea otter. (Unpublished.) 
Tarasorr, F. J., A. BISAILLON, J. PirrArD, and A. P. WuHrIeT 
1972. Locomotory patterns and external morphology of the river otter, sea otter, and 
harp seal (Mammalia). Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 915- 
929. 
VANDEVERE, J. E. 
1969. Feeding behavior of the southern sea otter. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual 
Conference on Biological Sonar and Diving Mammals, Stanford Research 
Institute, pp. 87-94. 


yp Mee 8 
he 


aes 


aX ee eX) — 
ly ae PR! 


aie ane 


S ay % ie y at yp 
Ni Dees NI. sro. WN i 
RW gerne Na 


F ao 
ice ee iD tra aes 


Pee 


2, 
ea 
pele 


hy AG Desig e fo’ 


a Gh 


? 


se ANS ay \R 


PP Dairy Br Fight 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 
FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 21, pp. 501-506; 3 figs. December 19, 1973 


A NEW HAWAIIAN CHITON, 
RHYSSOPLAX LINSLEYI 
(MOLLUSCA: AMPHINEURA: CHITONIDAE) 


By 
Glenn E. Burghardt 


Steinhart Aquarium, California Academy of Sciences 
San Francisco, California 94118 


It has always puzzled conchologists that the Hawaiian Islands, which are 
so rich in marine mollusks, are poor in species of chitons. Only four Hawaiian 
species are known: Acanthochitona viridis (Pease, 1871), A. armata (Pease, 
1871), Ischnochiton petaloides (Gould, 1846), and the new species described 
below. 

This new species has been known for some years but has gone unnamed 
until this time. The first specimens brought to the attention of the author were 
collected by Mrs. Harold Gudnason at Puu o Hulu Beach, near Maili, Oahu, 
Hawaii, in the intertidal waters at low tide (0.0) on February 26, 1965. 


Rhyssoplax linsleyi Burghardt, new species. 
(Figures 1-3.) 


Dracnosts. The surface of the valves, while appearing smooth to the 
naked eye, looks pitted when viewed under low magnification. Under high 
magnification however, it is clear that the surface is indeed smooth, the ‘pitted’ 
appearance being caused by a color pattern composed of marks shaped like 
small starbursts. 

In addition to the pattern of ‘pit marks,’ the anterior valve has a series of 
between 26 and 36 (holotype has 36) shallow grooves which are weak and 
difficult to see unless viewed under side light. The interior of the valve has 
a series of 8 slits on the outer edge of the insertion plate. This edge is also 
finely pectinated, a feature typical of the family Chitonidae. 

Intermediate valves have the lateral areas defined but not sharply raised. 


[501] 


502 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


aT WT 
(Up 


x 
eet Te 


) 
Ld 
rt 4 fe y/ 
, 2 . 
Pr 


2 


e@ 
de) 
wv, 


Ficure 1. Holotype of Rhyssoplax linsleyiz. Length 13.3 mm., width 8.4 mm., height 2.5 
mm.; Puu o Hulu Beach, Oahu, Hawaii. 


They possess the same radiating series of bifurcating grooves as does the 
anterior valve. Generally, these grooves are three in number (as in the 
holotype), but can be single on young specimens. The central areas of these 
valves are cut longitudinally with from 10 to 15 (13 in holotype) sharp lines. 
Both lateral and central areas have the ‘pitted’ color pattern. The dorsal 
ridge is smooth and shiny with the valves beaked. The jugal area is also smooth 
but shows the ‘pit marks.’ The outer margins of the insertion plates are 
pectinated and have a single slit. 

The posterior valve appears smooth behind the slightly anterior mucro 
but also has the unique ‘pitted’ color pattern. This area has a series of from 
23 to 32 (26 in holotype) shallow radial grooves similar to those of the 


VoLt. XXXIX] BURGHARDT: HAWAIIAN CHITON 503 


Ficure 2. Rhyssoplax linsleyi: (a) anterior valve, (b) median valve, and (c) posterior 
valve. Shown are both the dorsal surface (left) and interior surface (right) of the valves. 


anterior valve. The interior of this valve shows the same series of slits—here 
numbering 12—and pectinations as does the anterior valve. 

DescripTION. Rhyssoplax linsleyi is a small chiton, averaging 9.6 mm. 
in length (mean obtained from 116 specimens). It is fairly broad, with an 
average ratio of width to body length of 3:5. The valves are moderately 
arched, the average height being in a ratio of 1:5 to the body length. 

The color of the valves is quite variable, ranging from a clean grey-white 
to a mottled black and white (holotype) or green and white. A few specimens 
in our sample were solid in color, either red or white, but such coloration 
appears to be rare. The color pattern occurs on both lateral and central areas. 
The interior of the valves is white with a slight bluish tint. 


The girdle is of medium width and is covered with the fairly large, smooth 


504 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


1B: Maui 


Ficure 3. Map of Hawaiian Islands showing the collecting sites of Rhyssoplax linsleyi 
on the islands of Oahu, Maui, and Kauai: (1) Puu o Hulu (type locality), (2) Ala Moana, 
(3) Wainanalo, (4) Kuhuku Point, (5) Honolua, and (6) Poipu Beach. 


scales typical of Chitonidae. This girdle is cream with green bands except on 
the solid colored specimens, where the girdle matches the valves in color. 

No radular studies were made. 

Type LocaLity. The type series was collected at Puu o Hulu Beach, near 
Maili, Oahu, Hawaii, on 26 February 1965, by Mrs. Harold Gudnason. 

TYPE MATERIAL. Holotype. An adult specimen preserved in alcohol is 
deposited in the California Academy of Sciences Department of Invertebrate 
Zoology Type Series, no. 567. Measurements are 13.3 mm. in length. 8.4 mm. 
in width, 2.5 mm. in height. 

Paratypes. Twenty-four paratypes collected with the holotype have been 
deposited in the mollusk type collections of the following museums and private 
collectors: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, two specimens, ANSP 
330098; Bernice P. Bishop Museum, two specimens, BPBM 206931; Cali- 
fornia Academy of Sciences, two specimens, CAS Geology 53956 (rearticu- 
lated), CASIZ type series no. 594; Los Angeles County Museum of Natural 
History, two specimens, LACM 1620; Museum of Comparative Zoology, two 
specimens, MCZ 272531; San Diego Natural History Museum, two specimens, 
SDSNH 62724, 62725; National Museum of Natural History, two specimens, 
USNM 735016; Glenn and Laura Burghardt, six specimens; Mrs. Harold 
Gudnason, four specimens. 


VoL. XXXIX] BURGHARDT: HAWAIIAN CHITON 505 


Discussion. This chiton has been collected from all sides of Oahu (Maili, 
Kahuku, Waimonalo, and Ala Moana). It has also been collected by Dr. 
Antonio Ferreira at Honolua Bay on the northwestern side of Maui, and by 
Dr. George Ramsay at Poipu Beach on the southern side of Kauai. It is found 
from the intertidal zone to a depth of 15 feet but not as an emergent species, 
as it has never been discovered completely exposed by the low tides. Generally, 
specimens can be found by turning small rocks, exposing the chitons clinging 
to the undersides. 

Measurements of 116 specimens studied are as follows: 


Oahu (82 specimens) Maui (34 specimens) 

Range Mean Range Mean 
Length 3.5-14.5 8.0 mm. 7.0-21.0 13.4 mm. 
Width 2.8— 6.2 4.9 mm. 4.0-12.4 8.2 mm. 
Height 0.7— 2.9 1.8 mm. —- -= 


According to Smith (1966) and Hyman (1967), many chitons brood their 
eggs and some even carry their young in the pallial cavity. Upon examining 
the specimens for this paper, I found that several were carrying eggs. The 
eggs were found to be slightly less than 0.2 mm. in diameter. 

This new species belongs to the family Chitonidae Rafinesque, 1915, genus 
Rhyssoplax Thiele, 1893, the type species being the North African Chiton 
affinis Issel, 1869 (International Committee on Zoological Nomenclature, 1971, 
p. 18). The approximately 30 species of Rhyssoplax have been recorded from 
Africa, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and now the distribution includes the 
Hawaiian Islands. No species of Rhyssoplax occurs on the Pacific coast of 
North America (Burghardt and Burghardt, 1969). Species in this group are 
sometimes referred to the genus Anthochiton Thiele, 1893, but Iredale (1914, 
p. 40) and Smith (1960, pp. 65-66) have referred Anthochiton to the synonymy 
of Rhyssoplax Thiele, 1893, which has been placed on the Official List of 
Generic Names in Zoology (International Committee on Zoological Nomen- 
clature, 1971, p. 18). 

Rhyssoplax linsleyi does not closely resemble any other described species. 
Its unique ‘pitted’ pattern, discussed above, distinguishes this species from all 
other Rhyssoplax known to date. Edmonson (1946, p. 118, fig. 546) mentions 
an undescribed chiton from Kanoehe Bay which undoubtedly belongs to R. 
linsleyi. In the Bishop Museum there are two lots of chitons which were 
labelled as a new species by Dall (BPBM no. 895.8 and 895.8a), but not 
published (personal communication, Mrs. H. Gudnason). These also represent 
R. linsleyi. 

This new species is named in honor of Mrs. Gudnason’s father, Earle G. 
Linsley, Honorary Associate in Astronomy, Bernice P. Bishop Museum and 
Planetarium (1957-1962). 


506 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


The author wishes to express his thanks to Mr. Allyn G. Smith of the 
California Academy of Sciences for his review and assistance, to Mrs. Harold 
Gudnason for permission to work on her Oahu specimens, to Dr. Antonio 
Ferreira for permission to work on his Maui specimens, and to Betsy Harrison 
and Hilda Manzak for specimens used for this study; and a special thanks to 
wife, Laura, whose immeasurable help has made this paper possible. The 
figures were done by Roderick MacPherson. 


LITERATURE CITED 


BurGHARDT, GLENN, AND LAURA BURGHARDT 

1969. Collector’s Guide to West Coast Chitons. Special Publication No. 4, San Francisco 

Aquarium Society, 45 pp., 4 pls. 
EDMONDSON, CHARLES H. 

1946. Reef and shore fauna of Hawaii. Special Publication no, 22, Bernice P. Bishop 

Museum, 381 pp., 223 figs. 
HyMaANn, LIBBIE 

1967. The Invertebrates. Vol. 6, Mollusca no. 1. Pp. 70-142, figs. 29-57. New York, 
McGraw Hill. 

INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE ] 

1971. Opinion 951. Rhyssoplax Thiele, 1893 (Amphineura): designation of a type- 
species under the plenary powers. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 
28, pts. 1 and 2, pp. 18-19. 

TIREDALE, ToM 

1914. The chiton fauna of the Kermadec Islands. Proceedings of the Malacological 

Society of London, vol. 11, pp. 25-51, pls. I-II. 
SmitH, ALLYN G. 

1960. Amphineura. Pp. 41—76, figs. 33-45, in: R. C. Moore (Ed.), “Treatise on Inverte- 
brate Paleontology,’ Part I, Mollusca 1. Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society 
of America and University of Kansas Press. 

1966. The larval development of chitons (Amphineura). Proceedings of the California 
Academy of Sciences, vol. 32, no. 15, pp. 433-446, 11 figs. 


arino =RIAN viCal 
Vii hii Di Up 


LIBRAK" 
1974 
PROCEEDINGS 
OF THE Woods Hole, Mass 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY -OF-SCTENCES 


FOURTH SERIES 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 22, pp. 507-516; 3 figs. June 27, 1974 


NEZUMIA (KURONEZUMIA) BUBONIS, A NEW 
SUBGENUS AND SPECIES OF GRENADIER 
(MACROURIDAE: PISCES) FROM HAWAII AND 
THE WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC 


By 
Tomio Iwamoto 


California Academy of Sciences 
San Francisco, California 94118 


INTRODUCTION 


In the course of exploratory fishing by the R/V Oregon off the Caribbean 
coast of Colombia in the spring of 1964, a large black grenadier was captured by 
a trawl fished at a depth of 400 fathoms. The fish resembled Nezumia atlantica 
(Parr, 1946) in its general body shape and dentition, but it differed widely in 
several meristic and morphometric features and in having a velvetlike texture 
to its squamation and a peculiarly enlarged scaly swelling anterior to the vent. 
Additional specimens were subsequently collected both in the Caribbean Sea 
and in the Gulf of Mexico by the R/V Pillsbury and the R/V Oregon II. The 
surprising presence of this species off Hawaii was revealed upon examination 
of the fishes collected by Paul J. Struhsaker of the National Marine Fisheries 
Service. An undescribed, closely related species from the South China Sea was 
examined in June, 1970, in the collections of the Fisheries Research Station, 
Aberdeen, Hong Kong. 

In squamation and in head shape the new species resembles certain species 
of Malacocephalus, and the swelling before the vent appears to be an exaggera- 
tion of the slight swelling before the vent in members of that genus; but the 
dentition, the strong serrations on the second spinous dorsal ray, and several 
other features are totally in disagreement. In such features as length of upper 
jaw and number of pyloric caeca, the species approaches certain species of Ventrt- 
fossa; but in other more important characters, such as the structure of the light 


[507] 


508 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


organ and the shape of the head, it differs widely from most members of that 
genus. 

The difficulty of allocating the species to a genus has led to further, more 
extensive study of the generic problems concerning Malacocephalus Gunther, 
1862; Ventrifossa Gilbert and Hubbs, 1920; and Nezumia Jordan, 1904 (Iwa- 
moto, MS). Publication of that study is being delayed because of the desire to 
incorporate much additional material. The description given here of the new 
species of Nezumia is being published at this time to make the name available to 
other workers. I have refrained from describing as new the species from the 
South China Sea because permanent disposition of the single representative has 
not been assured. The specimen now is at the Aberdeen Fisheries Research 
Station, Hong Kong. The new species and its closest congener from the South 
China Sea share certain characters (as indicated in the diagnosis below) so dif- 
ferent from those in other members of the genus Nezumia that subgeneric status 
is designated. 

METHODS 

Methods for making counts and measurements generally follow procedures 
outlined by Hubbs and Lagler (1958) and further described for macrourids by 
Gilbert and Hubbs (1916) and Iwamoto (1970). The rounded snout of the spe- 
cies treated here and the lack of a prominent terminal scute make determination 
of the anterior tip of the nasal rostrum difficult. For this reason, measurements 
normally taken from the tip of the nasal rostrum (e.g., snout length, head length) 
are instead taken from whichever median point on the snout is more anterior. 
All rays of the pectoral fin are counted, including the short, usually thin, sliver- 
like uppermost ray and the 1 to 3 small lowermost rays. All gillrakers, including 
rudimentary ones, along the medial sides of the first and second gill arches are 
counted. 

Institutional abbreviations are as follows: BPBM—Bernice P. Bishop 
Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii; CAS—California Academy of Sciences, San Fran- 
cisco, California; FRSA—Fisheries Research Station, Aberdeen, Hong Kong; 
UMML—University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric 
Sciences, Miami, Florida; USNM—Division of Fishes, United States National 
Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


I thank the persons listed below for their assistance during the preparation 
of this paper. The following made specimens available for examination: Harvey 
R. Bullis, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Miami, Florida; Edward 
F. Klima, NMFS, Pascagoula, Mississippi; Paul J. Struhsaker, NMFS, Hono- 
lulu, Hawaii; William Chan, Fisheries Research Station, Aberdeen, Hong Kong; 
C. Richard Robins, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, 
Miami, Florida. Lillian J. Dempster and William N. Eschmeyer critically re- 
viewed the manuscript. 


Vol. XXXIX] IWAMOTO: NEZUMIA BUBONIS 509 


Nezumia Jordan im Jordan and Starks, 1904 
Subgenus Kuronezumia Iwamoto, new subgenus 


Dracnosis. Species of Nezumia with light organ peculiarly enlarged into a 
bulbous, scaly, wartlike structure anterior to anus and between pelvic fin bases 
(fig. 3); bulbous structure housing a large lens which partly encapsulates 
luminescent gland that fronts anterior wall of rectum. Light organ closely asso- 
ciated with pelvic girdle, the large lens essentially overriding part of girdle. An- 
terior dermal window of light organ at bottom of deep fossa and covered by 
bulbous lens-luminescent-gland mass. Snout almost entirely covered with small 
uniform scales; only thin margin above upper lips naked. Scales on suborbital 
region small, uniform, not forming a stout ridge. Body scales small, densely 
covered with extremely fine erect spinules. Color dark brown to black. Second 
spinous ray strongly serrated. 

Remarks. The bulbous structure housing the light organ in species of the 
subgenus Kuronezumia is apparently unique in the family, although the struc- 
ture is vaguely approached by a swelling in the same region in members of 
Malacocephalus. (It appears to be an anteroventral swelling of the scaled area 
between the periproct and the anterior dermal window and a gross hypertrophy 
of the condition in Malacocephalus, where the area is slightly raised and the 
anterior dermal window sits in a relatively deep fossa, with the posterior wall of 
the depression steep, but not overlapping.) The species of the new subgenus 
have a darker overall coloration than almost every other member of Nezumia 
and resemble Trachonurus in that regard. Members of the subgenus are prob- 
ably the largest of the genus, with V. (Kuronezumia) bubonis attaining a length 
of over 630 mm. The largest specimen of N. atlantica (another large species 
of Nezumia) I have measured is 450 mm. in total length. 

Etymotocy. The name is derived from the Japanese, kuroi, black or dark, 
and nezumi, rat, and is to be treated as feminine in gender. 


Nezumia bubonis Iwamoto, new species. 
(Figures 1-3.) 

Counts. First dorsal rays II, 10-12; pectoral fin rays 23-26; pelvic fin rays 
11-12 (one specimen with 9 in one fin, another specimen with 13 in one fin). 
Gillrakers on first arch 1-2 + 7-9 (usually 2-+ 8); rakers on second arch 
1-2 + 7-9. Scales below origin of first dorsal fin 14 to about 20, below origin of 
second dorsal fin 12-14; lateral line scales counted from the anteriormost 
scale posteriorly over distance equal to predorsal length 47-61. Abdominal 
vertebrae 13. 

MorpHoMEtryY. Head length of 10 specimens examined 30 to 125 mm.; 
total length 140+ to 630 mm. The following measurements are in percent of 
head length: snout length 26-32; ventral length of snout 13—18; orbit diameter 
23-31; interorbital width 23-26; postorbital length 44-51; distance orbit to 


[Proc. 4TH Ser. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


510 


“WU $7 SyUaSeIdat o[eIg “URBIO }YSI] JO JUIWSIE[Ua SNoq[nq 0} syutlod MoOLIW “PIgp UOTWRIS 
u03IQ A/A ‘OXIA JO FINE) ‘YyIBua] peoy “wu Cog ‘7/8L7 “OU SYD ‘OJOWIRMT seM0gnq (DIUNZaU0ANY) DUUNZaN JO ddAjO[ORY “] aUnorg 


Vol. XXXIX] 


IWAMOTO: NEZUMIA BUBONIS 


Bad) 


Hil 


Slit 


BPBM uncatalogued, 59 mm. head length, from off Hawaii, R/V Townsend Cromwell cruise 


is, 


bubon 


umia 


o 
ra 


Paratype of Ne 


FIGURE 2. 
40, station 87. Scale represents 25 mm. 


Ut 
_ 
bo 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


C7UI 


Ficure 3. Ventral view of abdominal area of Nezumia bubonis showing position of bul- 
bous swelling of light organ (l.0.) before anus. A—origin of anal fin. 


angle of preopercle 34-44; suborbital width 17—20; length upper jaw 35-44; 
greatest body depth 88-109; distance from base of outer pelvic fin to origin of 
anal fin 23-37 (usually 31-37); distance anus to anal origin 11—22; interspace 
between first and second dorsal fins 19-34; height first dorsal fin 89-92 (2 
specimens); length pectoral fin 49-66; length outer pelvic ray 40-64; length 
barbel 20-29; length outer gill slit 16-21. 

DescriPTION. Body deep, its greatest depth just anterior to first dorsal 
fin; trunk short, distance isthmus to anal origin about one-half length of head; 
body tapering rapidly behind trunk into long straplike tail. Head about one- 
fifth total length, laterally compressed, sides almost flat with no prominent 
projections or ridges; interorbital space slightly convex, proportionately wid- 
est in largest specimens; suborbital area broad, flat, evenly and completely 
scaled, without a coarsely scaled ridge. Mouth almost terminal; posterior end 
of maxillary lying under anterior half of orbits. Snout broadly rounded in 
profile, without a well-marked tip, generally not projecting beyond upper jaws. 
Orbits elliptic, proportionately largest in smallest specimens, usually longer in 
vertical than in horizontal diameter; upper margins not entering dorsal profile. 
Gill membranes united just behind vertical through posterior margin of orbits, 
attached to isthmus with a moderately narrow posterior free fold. 

Fin positions best seen in illustration of 59-mm.-head-length paratype from 
Hawaii (fig. 2). Severe dorsal flexure distorts normal positions of fins of holo- 
type. First dorsal fin complete in only two paratypes from Hawaii, measuring 


Vol. XXXIX] IWAMOTO: NEZUMIA BUBONIS 513 


89 and 92 percent of head length; spinous second ray strongly serrated along 
leading edge and slightly produced. Pelvic fins finely but densely scaled along 
exposed bases; outer ray slightly prolonged beyond other rays. 

Head and body generally evenly and completely scaled. Exposed posterior 
and posteroventral margins of interoperculum scaled. Gular and _branchio- 
stegal membranes generally naked, although a few small patches of deeply 
embedded scales occasionally found at bases of branchiostegal rays; in one 
specimen, a few scales found at extreme tips of fourth and fifth branchiostegal 
rays. A narrow margin of scaleless skin along snout just above upper lip. 

Scales on body and head very small and strongly adherent. Long, fine, 
slender spinules densely cover scales on body; spinules on nape scales almost 
erect, those on other parts of body reclined at about a 30-degree angle from 
vertical. Scales on head tend to have somewhat more stubby and conical spi- 
nules generally arranged in 3—7 radiating rows. No stout modified scales present 
on snout or suborbital region. 

Pyloric caeca of two specimens moderately long (about 35 percent head 
length), unbranched, 35 and 39 in number. Gas glands of swim bladder two, 
kidney-shaped in outline although almost round in cross section; retia two, 
long and thin, about 16 mm. long in 113-mm.-head-length specimen. 

Dentition consists of broad villiform bands of small teeth in both jaws with 
a slightly enlarged, evenly spaced outer series in upper jaw. 

General color swarthy to dark brown with ventral surfaces of head, gill 
covers, and abdomen black to brownish black. Lips, gular and branchiostegal 
membranes, barbel, margins of orbits, periproct, and scaleless ventral margin 
of snout black. Buccal membranes light gray to dark gray. Gill cavity linings 
generally blackish towards outer and upper margins and paler ventrally and 
deeper within the cavity. Peritoneal membrane pallid with numerous black 
specks. All fins black. 

COMPARISONS AND RELATIONSHIPS. The closest relative of Nezumia bubo- 
nis is an undescribed species from the South China Sea. Together they comprise 
the subgenus Kuronezumia. Nezumia bubonis differs from the undescribed 
species in having more pelvic fin rays (normally 11-12 compared with 8), 
slightly fewer scales below the second dorsal fin (12-14 versus 16) and a nar- 
rower interorbital space (23-26 percent of head length compared with 29 
percent). 

Nezumia darus (Gilbert and Hubbs, 1916) most closely approaches the 
members of subgenus Kuronezumia by its somewhat similar squamation and 
head physiognomy. The absence of ventral tubercular swellings, the more 
pronounced terminal snout scute, and the fewer scale rows below the second 
dorsal fin immediately separate V. darus from both N. bubonis and its South 
China Sea counterpart. Nezumia burragei (Gilbert, 1905), N. hebetatus (Gil- 
bert, 1905), and N. macronemus (Smith and Radcliffe im Radcliffe, 1912) 


514 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRoc. 4TH SER. 


all fall in a loose group near NV. darus in their resemblance to the species of 
subgenus Kuronezumia. But, in addition to the subgeneric distinctions, NV. 
burragei differs in having a well developed terminal snout scute and a sub- 
orbital ridge formed of two rows of stout scutelike scales, and most of the 
ventral surfaces of the snout and suborbital area naked; NV. hebetatus differs in 
having a more pointed snout, extensive naked areas on both the upper and lower 
surfaces of the snout and on the ventral surface of the suborbital region, a 
narrow suborbital ridge formed of two rows of stout scales, and a posterior 
margin of the preoperculum that is inclined forward; and N. macronemus 
differs in having a more pointed snout and lanceolate scale spinules. 

DIsTRIBUTION. Off the Hawaiian Islands, in the Gulf of Mexico, and in 
the Caribbean Sea. Capture depths ranged from 732 to 1062 meters. 

Etymotocy. The name comes from the Greek, bubonis, a tumor, and is to 
be treated as a noun in apposition. 

ReMARKS. The peculiar distribution pattern of this species cannot be ade- 
quately explained because of the paucity of material and our present general 
lack of knowledge of dispersal means of macrourid fishes. Probably the species 
is much more widely distributed and the lack of more locality records is simply 
a reflection of sketchy collecting efforts. 

SPECIMENS EXAMINED. Holotype: CAS no. 27872, 86 mm. head length, 
480 mm. total length (including a small pseudocaudal), western Gulf of Mexico 
off Barra San Antonio, Mexico, (24°49’N., 96°27’W.), in 500 fathoms (914 
meters), by 40-ft. otter trawl, R/V Oregon station 4814, 12 March 1964, bottom 
temperature 41°F (5°C). 

Paratypes (9 specimens from 7 localities): USNM 210592 (2, 53-100 mm. 
head length, 284-500 mm. total length), off Colombia, R/V Oregon station 
4902 (9°02’N., 76°31.5’W.), in 400 fathoms (732 meters), by 65-ft. otter trawl, 
28 May 1964; UMML uncatalogued (1, 111 mm. H.L., 550 mm. T.L.), off 
Colombia, R/V Pillsbury station 388 (10°16’N., 76°03’W.), in 450-580 fathoms 
(823-1061 meters), by 40-ft. otter trawl, 15 July 1966; CAS no. 27873 (1, 125 
mm. H.L., 630 mm. T.L.), Gulf of Mexico, R/V Oregon IJ station 10955 
(21°41’N., 96°55’W.), in 490 fathoms (896 meters), by 150-ft. otter trawl, 
3 June 1970; USNM 210593 (1, 113 mm. H.L., 560 mm. T.L.), Gulf of Mexico, 
R/V Oregon II station 11136 (24°27’N., 87°38’W.), in 500 fathoms (914 
meters), by 71-ft. otter trawl, 9 August 1970; BPBM uncatalogued (1, 39.6 
mm. H.L., 180 + mm. T.L.), Hawaiian Islands, R/V Townsend Cromwell cruise 
35, station 24 (21°06.5’N., 156°13.5’W.), in 640-686 meters, by 41-ft. otter 
trawl, 5 April 1968; CAS no. 27874 (2, 30-56 mm. H.L., 140 + —246 mm. T.L.), 
Hawaiian Islands, R/V Townsend Cromwell cruise 40, station 86 (21°06.8’N., 
156°13.7’W.), in 631-705 meters, by 41-ft. otter trawl, 23 November 1968; 
BPBM uncatalogued (1, 59 mm. H.L., 247 mm. T.L.), Hawaiian Islands, R/V 


Vol. XXXIX] IWAMOTO: NEZUMIA BUBONIS 515 


Townsend Cromwell cruise 40, station 87 (21°04.6’N., 156°10.6’W.), in 623-- 
667 meters, by 41-ft. otter trawl, 23 November 1968. 


Nezumia species. 


Counts. First dorsal fin rays II,10; pectoral fin rays 24; pelvic fin rays 8. 
Gillrakers on first arch 2 + 8; on second arch 2+ 7. Scales below origin of 
first dorsal fin 17-18; below origin of second dorsal fin 16; lateral line scales 
counted from the anteriormost scale for a distance equal to the predorsal length 
50. 

MorpHoMEtRY. The following are in percent of head length: snout length 30; 
orbit diameter 25; interorbital width 29; postorbital length 48; distance orbit 
to angle of preopercle 41; suborbital width 18; length upper jaw 41; greatest 
body depth 100; interspace between first and second dorsal fins 21; height of first 
dorsal fin 93; length pectoral fin 63; length outer pelvic ray 55; length barbel 
22; length outer gill slit 20. 

Dracnosis. A species of Vezumia of the subgenus Kuronezumia with 8 pelvic 
fin rays. Scales very small, finely spinulated, 16 rows below origin of second 
dorsal fin. Pectoral fin rays 24. Interorbital width 29 percent of head length. 

REMARKS. The species agrees with the description previously given of Nezu- 
mia bubonis so closely that it would be redundant to repeat the same characters. 
A comparison of the differences between the two species of the subgenus is given 
in the description of NV. bubonis. 

DISTRIBUTION. South China Sea. 

SPECIMEN EXAMINED. FRSA uncatalogued, (50 mm. H.L.), from the South 
China Sea. 


LITERATURE CITED 


GILBERT, CHARLES H. 

1905. The deep-sea fishes of the Hawaiian Islands. Pp. 576-713, pls. 66-101, figs. 230- 
276. In, David Starr Jordan and Barton Warren Evermann: The aquatic re- 
sources of the Hawaiian Islands. Bulletin of the United States Fish Commis- 
sion, vol. 23, part 2. 

GILBERT, CHARLES H., AND CArt L. Hupps 

1916. Report on the Japanese macrouroid fishes collected by the United States fisheries 
steamer “Albatross” in 1906, with a synopsis of the genera. Proceedings of the 
United States National Museum, vol. 51, no. 2149, pp. 135-214, pls. 8-11. 

1920. Contributions to the biology of the Philippine Archipelago and adjacent region. 
The macrouroid fishes of the Philippine Islands and the East Indies. United 
States National Museum, Bulletin 100, vol. 1, part 7, pp. 369-588. 

GUNTHER, ALBERT 
1862. Catalogue of the fishes in the British Museum, vol. 4, pp. 1-534. 
Husps, Cart L., anpD Kart F. LAGLER 

1958. Fishes of the Great Lakes region. Revised edition. Cranbrook Institute of Sci- 

ence, bulletin 26, pp. 1-213. 


516 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Twamoto, Tomio 
1970. The R/V Pillsbury deep-sea biological expedition to the Gulf of Guinea, 1964-65. 
19. Macrourid fishes of the Gulf of Guinea. Studies in Tropical Oceanography, 
Miami, no. 4, part 2, pp. 316-431, figs. 1-27. 
(MS). Macrourid fishes of the tribe Malacocephalini (Macrouridae: Gadiformes). 
Doctoral dissertation submitted to the University of Miami, June 1972. 
JorpAN, Davin S., AnD Epwrn C. STARKS 
1904. List of fishes dredged by the steamer Albatross off the coast of Japan in the 
summer of 1900, with descriptions of new species and a review of the Japanese 
Macrouridae [by Jordan and Gilbert]. Bulletin of the United States Fish 
Commission, vol. 22 for 1902, pp. 577-630, pls. 1-8. 
Parr, ALBERT E. 
1946. The Macrouridae of the western North Atlantic and Central American seas. 
Bulletin of the Bingham Oceanographic Collections, no. 10, part 1, pp. 1-99. 
RADCLIFFE, LEWIS 
1912. Scientific results of the Philippine cruise of the fisheries steamer ‘‘Albatross,” 
1907-1910. No. 21. Descriptions of a new family, two new genera, and twenty- 
nine new species of anacanthine fishes from the Philippine Islands and con- 
tiguous waters. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, vol. 43, 
0. 1924, pp. 105-140, pls. 22-31, figs. 1-11. 


PROCEEDINGS 90050 pi tenical Jal 


OF THE eli ARY 


ES Ets 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, , 


FOURTH SERIES 
Woods at le Mas 


/ 


Vol. XXXIX, No. 23, pp. 517-562; 6 figs.; 4 tables.“~~~~~~June*27, 1974 


REVISED DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY OF THE 
EXPERIMENTAL MOHOLE DRILLING, 
GUADALUPE SITE 


By 


Hans-Joachim Schrader 


Geologisch-Paldéontologisches Institut und Museum der Universitat Kiel, 
23 Kiel, Olshausenstrafe 40/60, F. R. Germany 


Apstract: Thirty-four diatom-bearing samples were obtained from cores recovered 
at the Experimental Mohole Drilling (EMD), Guadalupe Site. A planktonic-diatom 
stratigraphy is defined through correlation of ranges of key species of the EMD with 
a continuously cored section off California (DSDP, leg 18, Site 173). The Pliocene- 
Miocene boundary (defined as the base of the Gilbert Reversed Paleomagnetic 
Epoch) occurs between samples EMD-8-10-44/45 cm. and EMD-8-10-100/101 cm. 
The Middle Miocene to Late Miocene boundary (defined as occurring within Geo- 
magnetic Epoch 11) occurs between samples EMD-8-15-100/101 cm. and EMD-8- 
15-200/201 cm. The youngest investigated sediment (EMD-8-9-5/6 cm.) cor- 
relates with North Pacific Diatom Zone 10 of Middle Pliocene age (upper part of 
the Gilbert Magnetic Epoch); the oldest investigated sediment (EMD-7-2-0/17 
cm.) correlates with North Pacific Diatom Zone 24, with NN 6 Standard Nanno- 
plankton Zone, and with the Dictyocha octacantha Silicoflagellate Zone. The sedi- 
mentation rate for the interval from 80 to 95 meters below the sea floor is about 7 
meters/million years; it increases abruptly over the interval from 95 to 115 meters 
below the sea floor to approximately 30 m./m.y. and decreases again to approxi- 
mately 7 m./m.y. for the interval from 115 to 135 meters below the sea floor. 
One new genus and ten new species of diatoms are described, and five new com- 
binations of names are proposed. 


List of new taxonomic entries and new combinations: 


a. New genus. 


Cussia 


[517] 


518 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


b. New species. 


Biddulphia moholensis CAS 54409 
Coscinodiscus moholensis CAS 54410 
Cussia lancettula CAS 54411 
Cussia moholensis CAS 54413 
Nitzschia burcklia CAS 54415 
Nitzschia kanayensis CAS 54417 
Nitzschia moholensis CAS 54419 
Nitzschia riedelia CAS 54420 
Nitzschia seiboldia CAS 54422 
Rouxia moholensis CAS 54424 


c. New combinations. 
Cussia mediopunctata 
Cussia mediopunctata var. matraensis 
Cussia paleacea 
Cussia praepaleacea 


Cussia tatsunokuchiensis 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


This investigation was financially supported by the Deutsche Forschungs- 
gemeinschaft and the United States National Science Foundation. I thank W. R. 
Riedel and T. Walsh of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla for pro- 
viding samples from the EMD; L. H. Burckle of Lamont-Doherty Geological 
Observatory, New York for providing samples from Lamont cores; E. Seibold of 
Geologisches Institut, Kiel and J. Koizumi of Institut Geological Sciences, Toyo- 
noka for discussing stratigraphic problems; and Frau Schmidtmann, Frau Pro- 
kopek, and Frau Enke for technical assistance. Dr. P. Rodda read the manuscript 
and made many helpful suggestions. 


INTRODUCTION 


This study is a revision of the planktonic diatoms contained in 34 samples 
from cores recovered during the Experimental Mohole Drilling near Guadalupe 
Island off Baja California (Riedel e¢ a/., 1961). Age correlative samples from 
cores (Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory) and from a drill hole of the 
Deep Sea Drilling Project, leg 18, Site 173 near Cape Mendocino, California 
were also used in this study (chart 1, table 1). 

Previous zonations of the Experimental Mohole Drilling cores have been 
made on Foraminifera (Parker, 1964; Bandy and Ingle, 1970), on calcareous 
nannoplankton (Martini and Bramlette, 1963; Martini, 1971), on silicoflagellates 
(Martini, 1972), and on diatoms (Kanaya, 1971). 

After publication of the Neogene diatom zonation of the East-Equatorial 
Pacific (Burckle, 1972) and the completion of a Neogene diatom zonation of the 


Vor. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 519 


€Zl dasdqd® 


| 
| 


$9 71D O 


gO07 Il DO ear 


+ 
| pTT lL DY | 


io 


150F 180° 150° 100\A/ 


Cuart 1. Index map showing localities of investigated cores. DSDP 173: Deep Sea 
Drilling Project, leg 18, Site 173; EMD: Experimental Mohole Drilling, Guadalupe Site; 
RC-65, 208, 224: Robert Conrad cores (Lamont Doherty Geological Observatory). 


TABLE 1. List of cores used in this study, with references to published descriptions. 
IRDSDP—Initial reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project; LDGO—Lamont Doherty Geo- 
logical Observatory; SIO—Scripps Institution of Oceanography. 


Water 


Core No. Inst. Latitude Longitude Depth (m.) Author 
RC-12-65 LDGO 04° 39’N 144° 58’ W 4868 Burckle 1972 
RC-11-208 LDGO 05° 21’N 139° 58’ W 4920 Burckle 1972 
RC-11-224 LDGO O3in327'5 122° 05.5’ W 4319 Burckle 1972 
EMD-6,8,7,10 SIO 28° 59’N 117° 30’ W 3566 Riedel et al. 1961 


Parker 1964 

Martini 1971 

Kanaya 1971 
DSDP-173 SIO-DSDP 39° 57.7’'N W2SS AT? WY 2927 IRDSDP 1973 


520 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


EMD CORE LOG 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


—— 


6 
i HOLE 10 
HOE 7 
interval cored 
9 core 
mM BS ae interval recovered 


Cuart 2. Core log, Experimental Mohole Drilling, Guadalupe Site. 


interval recovered. 


Black intervals: 


VoL. XXXIX] 


TABLE 2. 


SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 


521 


Sample data for cores from the Experimental Mohole Drilling, Guadalupe 
Site. Sedimentological data from Riedel et al. (1961). 


Hole Core Sampled interval in cm. Sedimentological observations (Riedel ef al., 1961) 
6 2 30/ 31 greenish gray, clayey siliceous-calcareous ooze 
8 9 5/6 pale olive, siliceous-calcareous 00ze 

140/141 pale olive, calcareous-siliceous 00ze 
193/194 pale olive, calcareous-siliceous ooze 
240/241 pale olive, calcareous-siliceous 00ze 
290/291 olive-gray, siliceous-calcareous ooze 
8 10 44/ 45 dusky yellow-green, silty siliceous ooze 
100/101 dusky yellow-green, siliceous ooze 
200/201 dusky yellow-green, siliceous ooze 
300/301 dusky yellow-green, siliceous ooze 
400/401 dusky yellow-green, siliceous ooze 
8 11 30/ 31 yellowish gray, siliceous ooze 
90/ 91 grayish green, siliceous-calcareous 00ze 
200/201 greenish gray, siliceous 00ze 
300/301 greenish gray, siliceous ooze 
390/391 light olive-gray, calcareous-siliceous 00ze 
8 12 94/ 95 pale olive, calcareous-siliceous ooze 
203/204 grayish yellow-green, siliceous-calcareous ooze 
8 13 30/ 31 dark greenish-gray, siliceous ooze 
100/101 dusky yellow green, siliceous ooze 
200/201 dusky yellow green, siliceous ooze 
262/265 dusky yellow green, siliceous ooze 
8 14 10/ 11 dark greenish gray, siliceous ooze 
100/101 dark greenish gray, siliceous 00ze 
400/401 dark greenish gray, siliceous ooze 
8 15 35/ 36 dusky yellow green, siliceous-calcareous ooze 
93/ 95 pale olive, calcareous-siliceous ooze 
100/101 light greenish gray, calcareous siliceous ooze 
200/201 light greenish gray, calcareous siliceous ooze 
300/301 light greenish gray, calcareous siliceous ooze 
504/505 pale olive, calcareous-siliceous 00ze 
il 1 5/0 yellowish gray, calcareous-siliceous 00ze 
41/ 42 greenish gray, siliceous ooze 
7 2 O/F17 greenish gray, siliceous ooze 
10 1 30/ 43 greenish gray, calcareous ooze 


North Pacific based principally on a continuously cored stratigraphic hole 
California (Deep Sea Drilling Project, leg 18, Site 173, Schrader, 1973a) it was 
possible to prepare a revised diatom stratigraphy of the EMD which differs from 
that of Kanaya (1971). 


off 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


CALIFORNIA 


CORRELATION 


NEOGENE 


S4INOZ 


WOLVIG 


I141DVd 


IWIYOLVNODA 


Pseudoeunotia 


doliolus 
praebergonii 


Rhizosolenia 


jouseae 


Nitzschia 


Thalassiosira 


convexa 


miocenica 
porteri 


Nitzschia 


Nitzschia 
= 


SIOVIS 
AINIYVW 
VINYOIIIVD 


Coscinodiscus 


yabei 


REPETIAN 


DELMONTIAN 


MOHNIAN 
LUISIAN 


ANOZddN 


INOZ 1OI0VY 


usd g; 


maa 


e| = 


Ag: 


VENTURIAN 


17 


a) 


—————_> = 
“ 


sDjuad ‘¢ 


nado: ‘uadGy 


' 
4 


snwiyjNuadayuD “© 


\luosiayjad"> “UODI4D] “> 


INOZ ONNVN |< 


Fa 


10 


INOZ WVAO4 


HDOd3 


iia 


- | 


° 


INIDOINId 


INIDOIW 


j1V1 


JINIDOIW JIGGIW 


HDOdj OVW 
‘10d ‘OVW 


I 


‘DO1LS1I41d 


VWVALVW ISSNVD 


| 
“” 


Lydd 119 


gg wo 


wn 


ae 


mnie Le 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 523 


METHODS 


Samples from Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory were taken by L. H. 
Burckle; samples of the EMD were taken by T. Walsh, and samples from DSDP 
Site 173 were made by the author. 

Treatment of the diatom material and slide preparation followed the stan- 
dardized methods of Schrader (MS.). Slides were mounted with Aroclor 4465 
and key species were marked with a diamond microscopical specimen marker. 
All important species were photographed through a Leitz Orthoplan, Apo Oil 
92 X, 1.4 n.A. and 10 X Periplan ocular. Holotypes, paratypes, and some other 
duplicates are deposited at the Department of Geology, California Academy of 
Sciences. Other illustrated specimens are in the author’s collection. Additional 
samples have been deposited at the Bundesanstalt fiir Bodenforschung, Hannover 
(L. Benda), and at the Friedrich Hustedt Arbeitsplatz fur Diatomeenkunde, 
Bremerhaven (R. Simonsen). 


EpocHs AND AGE BOUNDARIES 


The Upper-Middle Miocene boundary is placed within Geomagnetic Epoch 
11 following Burckle (1972). This boundary is shifted by Berggren (1972) to 
the upper part of Geomagnetic Epoch 10 (see chart 3). 

The Miocene-Pliocene boundary is placed at the top of Geomagnetic Epoch 
5 (bottom of the Reversed Gilbert Magnetic Epoch) (Burckle, 1972). 

Other boundaries are defined by the range of species in the Equatorial Pacific 
(Burckle, 1972) and the North Pacific (Schrader, 1973a). 

Most of the Equatorial and North Pacific Zones are defined by evolutionary 
events and morphotypic ranges of species (for definition of terms see Riedel and 
Sanfilippo, 1971). 


STRATIGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF DIATOMS 


The distribution of important planktonic diatom taxa is indicated in table 3. 
A great effort has been made to recognize and define reworked taxa. Ranges 
are plotted by symbols representing abundance and type of occurrence (alloch- 
thonous or autochthonous). Abundance and preservation was generally good 


Cuart 3. Correlation of the North Pacific Diatom Zonation (Schrader, 1973a) with Cali- 
fornian Marine Stages (Berggren, 1972; Bandy and Ingle, 1970), the Equatorial Pacific 
Diatom Zonation (Burckle, 1972), the Radiolarian Zonation (Riedel and Sanfilippo, 1971; 
Moore, 1971; after Berggren, 1972), the Standard Calcareous Nannoplankton Zonation 
(Martini, 1971; Bramlette and Wilcoxon, 1967; Baumann and Roth, 1969; Martini and 
Worsley, 1970), the Planktonic Foraminiferal Zones (Blow, 1969; after Berggren, 1972), 
the Paleomagnetic Stratigraphy (Burckle, 1972; Abdel-Monem et al., 1971), and the Radio- 
metric Time Scale (Cox, 1969; Abdel-Monem et al., 1971). 


[Proc. 4TH Serr. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


524 


=~ a 
re) Xu 
prt eee re) 4 u 
Fy) y y 3 8 
H) 4y u Lot /O0¢% 8 
& q fe Soe Loz/ooe - -8 - Wa 
P) u u tor/oolt = S 8 
g u u 8 
ie Gils ) ¥ y 8 
euoz a#uey yeTZAeY v u u 8 
Teqek snostpoutosog ca) u u LoL /oot 8 
9 y y= - u EDS PACH a AON} Wa 
fe) u Lh gtd Vi" ¥ 9¢/29e~- =e =e We 
COVER) i | er EC a he Gh ho Lor/oolt - - 98 - Wa 
euoz eSuey TeTy1eg fp l=. <meta = OL: as BS /0€ = El = 8. =sNe 
Tiezrod eTyOSz4IN Side |= ec eK Uy 8 
es |S So Ses Ss Se uu 8 
OTS XS Ss Pe ey eye 8 
LG | as ed ==] rt Pl 8 
= OC RR. i ae er a sate og /00¢ = EE = swat 
OYA Tal) ea a | MP Sic Sy ce Jere SS ti wi: Ga lacy fAoyss > (AI tsp heer 
SSE Men ed ete Mie O beth) SoS HS eee = u Cts BEeOSe =D ULES ee Sao 
> 
BOTUsOOTM STYOSZ4AIN €l SS Se a || hn: (ta Cu - } : Veen = Sle Lov /00P =O =8 = ane 
=e) ee Xe (io mie mee” ee = Mh Rh OS L0£/00£ - OL - 8 - WO 
<a Pee cane * Ce Oe Gee med == me Dp ear ete > Ce WT EY: Pe - Nod te 1oz2/ooe - OL - 8 - WO 
su0Z eFue}; 2 eg ee Os Se! ite eS OX eS C PARE tOL/oOL - OL - 8 - Wa 
TeTpzIeY Bxeauo0s ESSE EN I ES NP Cs a: Lge le ae A uy = Rf lle an = (1A Aad Sol EL ee Mie 
vITSOTSSETBUY, tL Xone Xae ch Wat tS AEX TSS S> BU Ty = ell t6e/06e -6- @ - NG 
a... eee SS SoU Re see ei SU Rt Be8 ye x Rig See tyz2/ove -6- 8 - Wa 
euoz esuey TeT41ed fh te a (Cie (Rape ee Ti | = =u = VEL/26b = 16 = 98) = Wer 
CISINIE CAMO EET SN Moe eo S a loeyo eS hy SS RRS wh > s tyL/ovL - 6 - @ - Wa 
Of jos S 7 oe eto too h tee ee dis uouiy GQ) fe 92 Go Site 
(ae Sa | ee sos ey Joe = 1 = 0b = Wa 
5 © Joe 
Oh [Si SS |S SSS SIS RS you 4 [2n/ OCS Rc EEO a 
4 - + ——__—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—-+-- ~~ T 
o ie LS SI i] 9 a) & Q to Es bo peyTOmMer yx 
pH B34 3 a a ole |d}e ¢ 
tors Biers aa re) uy) e|/@)/5 | o b quepunqe = y 
eis Boe lls: eee eee | Oe Cee 2 ae ee eee 
» op SA aes. saa - Se ee ae eo neler ll ei|| Same She uowmopj = 9 
NS ¢ SB ¢ J 2 a/p]|ol}p « 
5 5 » ee a EL Wea iS ci quenbezy = 
pos ns 3 ein a sen (ee oO QQ} 4 | 
ot a Boe im S (if) of c 5 B} p a erel = ¥ 
Py « me 3 Q & Pp no 8 a wo alr 
Oo = fo} ° oe Lone o °o i= Hn B ° o oO o 
Se im ct ene oh Bao He) op ven @ewdwu 8S FY aololoaloa|s¢ (over tee queseaid you 
a os p p =) aw pe tI Ss o o * o ° » @ r=] i=! o le} o - n => 
Be Se ec eee Sees 2 kee eee. yee 2 
D> - 0 Dds <r Ce te ion 0 D He) ~~ o vs o PF Bl ple Scot en! SWNOLVIC 
Qo 4 < @ ry (Cie er ct epee On an IS ye wo lo] B © 5 
fa Ct » H i=] ° » © FY @ © Pp a [ele ae) 
BS Ses Oe ie a aaa egg 5 ae eats edntepenp 
a4 om Zi CP sae 8 a 8 
a. » = A 4 5 ® Fd uTTTTId seTOYoW 
xo.9 aie o Fs o a na eyuemtsedxy 
mb mH 2 a 3 5 ot 7 
Pp “0 a as 4 ° 
w + r . q 
- wv io re wu. ° 
ty @ Fr ‘e r) 3 
J » < ® 
e. 3 8 i 
m 8 p. e 
re Q 7) 
° 5 
a 


‘(Sajnqsnaf Uayosg KUDU puv payrja) ajwaapom—py {poos—H :sp paywjnqn] st smoywrp {0 uoNDadasarg 
‘dADA—YS UOMMOI—J /JUDpUNnqD—Y ‘SD paqynjNngn] St ajdwups yova ut SmoqwIp fo aauDpuNgD 1010 
‘saivagsS Aapjo paysomai—y ‘(Saivads [0 aauasdnaz0 Sspm) JuDp 
~ungo—yp <(apys sag suamiags 0G uDYy} asom) Uuommor—J S(apys sag Ssuamizads QF uvyy adom) quanbas{—y {(apys sad 
suaunrads maf D Kjuo) aavsA—y ‘quasaad Jou — :suorjpiaasqqn Suimopjof ay. Suisn paqvjnqgny aav saizags moywig ‘aqis adnjq 
“DPONY “Suapaq aoyop jojuamiadxy ayy fo sajdwps aso wosf pasaaorad saizags moywup ruojyung fo ysvy “¢ AIAV, 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 525 


| a cal 
o °o eo oo 
oc oe] 4d 6 ac 
ao | =] HO a 0 
on ad eo oan mbmN 
So |an 8 @ v7 
: o o 
°o & He “A wo o tf 3 fo 
(2L6L) @TMONNE uoTzeU0Z mozRTG 3 = i A S a 5 a, 5 os 
OTJTOBeT Tetrozenby 9uzy yRIA uoTZeTeI1109 8 ons Ce Cae ae 
“A Id ) a dd 0 
oa agn Sd od Od 
od ak od og ga 
Qi | soo Qed @ -d dod 
NP “4 > & NP NP ov 
PH |@ES Pu PH aH 
ae 'coog da re) od 
Zz Ay iS om ZA Zz Ay on 
I 
| 
! I 
| I 
| | 
8t ‘eT daqqur ‘ugadvNHOS ‘uotzeU07Z W poly DBD |H 
WORETT OTFTO’T yxION UYTIA UOTZLETSeIIOD San [a ia 
sTWIOJTT AAS bn Oe) t fed os oe ee otf oe oe og Oe pes oe oe ot ee en nt oe oo 
Toqzeqeraid a H)efe tb 8 spt ee bs Op 8 bb 8 et cee pe cele oe ci ire oe et ot ot el ee 
Bye wed “ Mpiyea pm tem bt tt bt bee oe tp et ft bt tlk at pa 
' 
wotusootm i fiji t totem 8b tle oe alt oem mo ie tm tm lol 
"IPA BYELSQSY a mip te bt tom tp em tk tem me ty et tee tel ttm me 
Toqreq etuaToOsozTyYy Seem er I ROmmMOlmkOmmlm elo 1 s}t tft t 
SPEQCUTTeYTIeFzIe0 * Hl in| (erect [io arm cabal [cle ciear ts | 2s emo fuente ci 
as) STSUsUTTEYIOeS * ON PU |i CP ay fre) Ce Thee Ce et el eC Cy SOR Ie at cle ete On 0 
L 
= eyeysnyue u Cytpe bt bt b te em 8 melt km I moe tt tt tt treme mle 
™~ 
stTierngue steuoydeuyy 
SS BoOTULOSTTeO i 
BrrTyoing 4“ 
~ etlepata ft 
in ertprloqtes “ 
A TtpToyutereead “a 
a) aevesnol a 
eotrputtTAD eStyoszzIN 
(eeec0emoyeTp uoU) eT [938 eIOIIEW 
eptpuetds etrerpey 
wnyTnosnuto * 
MNOTULO;TTeO uUntmsapoyzty 
SnuIsstottdmts fs 
BSTMIOFTeuNS snostTptmay 


snydiomfjTod *j*o snynetmay 


xazl snostpomyuyW 


rare 


- = not present 


R 
F = frequent 


C = Common 
A = abundant 
X = reworked 


Experimental 
Mohole Drilling 
Guadalupe Site 
DIATOMS 


Continued. 


TABLE 3. 


526 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


2 | 3 © 3 
os | ca 4d 6 1 
acai © 2 es as 
Sree pee : ae 
oO lel eo Ho oa 
. om HY | a & ow 3% 
(ZL6L) ATHONNA uoTzeuoZ moze TT we) is ies ag as os 
OTJTOeG Tetarozenbm ayy uRTA UOTPETeIIOD ot omg ! aa: on ae 
od he ° od r) “dA os 
fq 'aan | sae fd On 
od aK owe 0 og ad 
24 |sgoo | Qain @ sr od 
ne a> %o a+ Re or 
SUH ie sie ee PH oH 
A so @ Ee) A oa 
ZA ha Om | wm Zz Om 
| 
| 
«| | 
| 
. ‘ ‘ | 
QL ‘Fe T daqur ‘uYaaqVHHOS ‘uoTtzeUu0Z ole-lo - lw pom i 
WORST IIFTOeI YZAON UZTA UOTZPETSIIOD Sle pial paeen? 
I 
= i= =I = 
41TS celal i 8 By Pa lt et Ii O 
satnotds eZ#uods iyi pommr trot om 
woneareeest | oP/P OO oOVOO|OY 
aouepungy <aiule qa cee cod <|< < 
suesut snjtosooutzoy =e (-ile~| [oe om —ilood |< 
+ i pe 
snostpoutosoo snostpopedsei) OG Oa etl OD oo OO 0 
wnewomeuuto “ ait tmemimimom st tie 
mnzrodvapuod mNTzRIGOTIYL 1 a 1ouot these ab nfs es 
PWISBTSUOT XTINZOTBBETeUL Sits ISS Ae ies 
TTasyozesn A pivje e tote dob bk to 
trdn1zzsa0 ra cairo 0 0 OD OD iyo 
exaauooerid u SN ee 0) A Osea Pee 
PAT}EU Ma mlil) me Om mle mm bb bli 
y ‘oads iu oo 2d oO OO to Ooo 
enbryue ia CaN ob OO TO Da Oy 
ewotTryueoxa i mili} i me 1 ee old bt time 
suetdtoep a mlijot og to tye bt tom 
eX9AU0D BITSOTSSETEYL zk 0 tected i) 1 Ole 0 
STMIOJTABTO u CH ie Ds uP ame ' 
BaptotyoszzyIU emsuotsseleuyy <p|<« Lous) (Sais) 
eueasnol erpeufc >] ils > fh 00 
striny picid ade py jon }on OG om |oe om 
septauo,tdtp *js°o ri i rt rien 
eoTurostyTeo erxnoy pala} i ae f ijtot 
a ee 
ro = hort eele re 
5 m TAT oO|\nno 
a Cem Laie s N 
a Pod >>> = SS 
o c & © ojoJnNoMmo cojooo 
H a ie] oo x Lam) HOT Oo OJM AO 
i als) eh 1s) --N mt N 
to oo | gs oO 
i=} a oe! H o 3 z tyrpeoe De Uy 
4d PP Co 8) UH ‘oO: oO) 
di a 4 S Hh & O « H MN] OV OlO Sata 
eon eele re 
roy Py r " ‘ 1 | ee! 4 
c ial ® je TN ti 
oR mh 1) 0g Fe), eh 
| 3} wjo|a@ o Dnojonno 
d © 4 = hd 
H ot &| O 
@ o ol] & tyeja Fiery et ed eC) OO) Oe 0 te ae Oyo. 0 
a oc 8 < 
1 ORs ial Higiag = SEED ES SS SSS SSE SHEE EEE = 
a = Oo] A fa] a ARPA AA AAA AAA Am RAM mw Aime ws 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 


EMD MULTIPLE CORRELATION 


on 
bo 
~ 


an) |S) || ap 
FL —s a 
eS) OC < 
O O N > 
= Zz << 
a = Zz ~ 
72, || || Z4 ry he 
16 a 
—=— | 
il lV 
50 DELMON-| DELMON 
TIAN TIAN 
and or 
ee) ame 
Hullets MOHNI - ah 
o AN 
a UPPER ‘| 
as ee OHNIA 
al Lye 
100 u | 2/9 
= E 
Oo -: 2 
O mil.years 15 x 
11.440.6 0 S| 8 | MOHNI- 7 
= * AN 
Z 18 7 
O Nee LOWER 
2 | = MOHNIAN 
QO 12.3:0.4 o 35 5 
Fa es 
a |S LUISIAN = 
Wilts 
150 — 
24 ; | 
8 
9 LUISIAN 
fal 
5 
M 


CuHart 4. Multiple microplankton correlation of the Experimental Mohole Drilling, 
Guadalupe Site, with North Pacific Diatom Zonation (Schrader, 1973a), Silicoflagellate 
Zonation (Martini, 1972), Standard Calcareous Nannoplankton Zonation (Martini, 1971), 
and Californian Marine Stages (Parker, 1964; Kanaya, 1971). Potassium-Argon dates 
from Dymond (1966). 


528 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


EMD 


1970 


NPDZONES 
BANDY & INGLE 


50 


DELMONTIAN 


MOHNIAN 
100 


11440,6 x 


12,3+0,4 


LUISIAN 


150 S 
15,0+7 xt tyq) RELIZIAN 
= 
ee | 


Cuart 5. Correlation of the diatom zonation of the Experimental Mohole Drilling, 
Guadalupe Site, with the North Pacific Diatom Zonation (Schrader, 1973a) and with 
Californian Marine Foraminiferal Stages (Bandy and Ingle, 1970). Absolute time scale 
for the North Pacific Diatom Zonation from Schrader (1973a) and chart 4; dates for the 
Californian Marine Stages from Bandy and Ingle (1970). Potassium-Argon dates from 
Dymond (1966) and Krueger (1964). 


BEST2eeeee ll 


Vor. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 529 


except for sample EMD-10-1-30/43 cm. Additional symbols indicate the occur- 
rences of sponge spicules and silt-size mineral components. The abundance of 
spicules and silt grain correlates directly with the amount of reworked shallow 
material including older fossil diatoms (EMD-8-9-193/194 cm.; EMD-8-9- 
240/241 cm.; EMD-8-9-290/291 cm.). 

Fifteen biostratigraphic units of the North Pacific Diatom Zonation and 
five biostratigraphic units of the East-Equatorial Diatom Zonation can be dif- 
ferentiated on the basis of ranges of planktonic diatom species (table 3). 

Only cold and temperate water species are present in this Middle Miocene 
to Pliocene interval. Comparable cool-water biofacies are present at DSDP 
leg 18, Site 173. 


BIOSTRATIGRAPHIC ZONATION OF THE EMD CORE. 


1.) North Pacific Diatom Zone 10. The unit includes samples EMD-6-2- 
30/31, and EMD-8-9-5/6 to EMD-8-9-240/241 cm. This unit is characterized 
by the presence of Coscinodiscus temperei, Denticula hyalina var. hustedti, 
Lithodesmium minusculum, Nitzschia cylindrica, N. jouseae, N. praereinholdii, 
Rhizosolenia barboi, Thalassiosira convexa, and T. nativa. The zone is correla- 
tive with the lower part of the Nitzschia jouseae Partial Range Zone (Burckle, 
1972). Youngest investigated material of EMD is of Early Pliocene age ( ~ 4.2 
m.y.). The top of the North Pacific Diatom Zone 10 was not found and should 
lie higher in the section. Sample EMD-6-2-30/31 is tentatively equivalent to 
EMD-8-9-140/141 cm. 

2.) North Pacific Diatom Zone 11. The unit includes samples from EMD- 
8-9-290/291 to EMD-8-10-44/45 cm. It is characterized by the occurrence of 
Thalassiosira usatchevii, T. convexa, Lithodesmium californicum, L. minus- 
culum, Denticula hustedtii, and D. hyalina var. hustedtii. This unit is correlative 
with the upper part of the Thalassiosira convexa Partial Range Zone of Burckle 
(1972) and is of Lower Pliocene age ( ~ 4.5—5.5 m.y.). 

3.) North Pacific Diatom Zones 12-14. These three zones could not be sub- 
divided in the EMD core and subdivisions on table 3 are tentative. The unit 
includes samples from EMD-8-10-100/101 to EMD-8-12-94/95 cm. It is charac- 
terized by the occurrence of Coscinodiscus temperei, Denticula dimorpha (lower 
part of the unit), D. lauta, Lithodesmium minusculum, L. californicum, Nitzschia 
praereinholdii, Rhizosolenia barboi, R. miocenica (lower part of the unit), Rouxia 
californica, Synedra jouseana (lower part of the unit), T/alassionema claviformis 
(lower part of the unit), and 7. nativa. This unit is correlative with the interval 
from the lower part of the Thalassiosira convexa Partial Range Zone to the 
Nitzschia miocenica Partial Range Zone of Burckle (1972) and is of upper Late 
Miocene age ( ~ 5.5 m.y. to 7.6 m.y., top of Geomagnetic Epoch 5 to base of 
Geomagnetic Epoch 7). 


530 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


EMD 
SEDIMENTATION 
RATE 


=e vy DYMOND 1966 
50 O THIS PAPER 


@ KRUEGER 1964 


100 


150 


2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1% 18 20 m.y. 


Vor. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 531 


4.) North Pacific Diatom Zone 15. The unit includes samples from EMD- 
8-12-203/204 to EMD-8-13-30/31 cm. It is characterized by the occurrence of 
Cussia praepaleacea, Denticula dimorpha, D. hustedtii, D. lauta, Nitzschia prae- 
reinholdu, N. burcklia, Rhizosolenia barboi, R. miocenica, R. praebarboi, Synedra 
jouseana, Thalassionema claviformis, and T. species A. (Burckle, 1972). This 
unit is correlative with the upper part of the Nitzschia fortert Partial Range Zone 
of Burckle (1972) and is of upper Late Miocene age (upper part of Geomagnetic 
Epoch 8; ~ 7.8 m.y.). 

5.) North Pacific Diatom Zone 16. This unit was only present in sample 
EMD-8-13-100/101 cm. It differs from North Pacific Diatom Zone 15 in the 
lack of Nitzschia praereinholdii and of Cussia paleacea, and in the consistent 
presence of Rhizosolenia praebarbot. This zone is correlative with the lower part 
of the Nitzschia porteri Partial Range Zone of Burckle (1972) and is of middle 
Late Miocene age ( ~ 8.2 m.y.—middle part of Geomagnetic Epoch 8). 

6.) North Pacific Diatom Zones 17-19. These zones could not be divided 
and subdivisions on table 3 are tentative. The unit includes samples EM D-8-13- 
262/265 to EMD-8-15-100/101 cm. It is characterized by the occurrence of 
Bruniopsis mirabilis, Cussia paleacea, C. praepaleacea, Coscinodiscus yabei, 
Denticula dimorpha (upper part of the unit), D. kustedtii, D. lauta, D. punctata 
var. hustedtii, Mediaria splendida, Nitzschia burcklia (upper part of the unit), 
N. riedelia (lower part of the unit), Rhizosolenia miocenica, R. praebarboi, 
Synedra jouseana, and Craspedodiscus coscinodiscus (lower part of the unit). 
This unit is correlative with the Coscinodiscus yabei Partial Range Zone of 
Burckle (1972), the base of which has not been defined. It ranges from the 
middle part of Geomagnetic Epoch 8 to the middle part of Geomagnetic Epoch 11 
(~ 8.3 my. to 12 my.). The base of this unit represents the Late-Middle 
Miocene boundary as defined by Burckle (1972), but note should be made of the 
different boundary chosen by Berggren (1972) (chart 3). 

7.) North Pacific Diatom Zone 20. The unit includes samples from EMD- 
8-15-200/201 to EMD-8-15-300/301 cm. It is characterized by the occur- 
rence of Actinocyclus cubitus, Cussia paleacea, C. praepaleacea, Coscinodiscus 
vetustissimus var. javanicus, C. antiquum, C. yabei, Denticula hustedti, D. lauta, 
D. nicobarica, D. punctata var. hustedtii, Mediaria splendida, Macrora stella, 
Nitzschia species 2 (Schrader), N. riedelia, Rhizosolenia praebarboi, Synedra 
jouseana, and Craspedodiscus coscinodiscus. This unit has not been correlated 
to paleomagnetic stratigraphy, but it does correlate with NN 6 of the Standard 
Calcareous Nannoplankton Zonation (Martini, 1971), and with the Corbisema 
triacantha Zone of the Silicoflagellate Zonation (Martini, 1972). This Zone is of 


< 

CuHarT 6. Sedimentation rate of the core samples from the Experimental Mohole Drilling, 
Guadalupe Site, as determined by Potassium-Argon dates (Dymond, 1966) and by diatom 
zonation. Note change of sedimentation rate at 95 meters below the sea floor. 


532 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 47TH SER. 


upper Middle Miocene age. Dymond (1966) determined the absolute age of 
sample EMD-8-15-86 cm. as 12.3 + 0.4 m.y. according to the Potassium-Argon 
dating method. This age correlates well with the top of Zone 20 of the North 
Pacific Diatom Zonation which has an approximate age of 12 my. 

8.) North Pacific Diatom Zones 21-23. These zones could not be divided 
precisely and the subdivisions on table 3 are tentative. The unit includes samples 
from EMD-8-15-504/505 cm. to EMD-7-2-41/42 cm. It is characterized by the 
occurrence of Actinocyclus ellipticus var. moronensis, Coscinodiscus lewisianus, 
Cussia paleacea, C. praepaleacea, Coscinodiscus yabei, Denticula hustedtu, D. 
lauta, D. nicobarica, Mediaria splendida, Nitzschia riedelia, N. species 2 
(Schrader), and Rhizosolenia praebarboi. The unit has not been correlated to 
paleomagnetic stratigraphy, but it is correlative with NN 6 of the Standard Nan- 
noplankton Zonation (Martini, 1971), and is of Middle Miocene age. 

9.) North Pacific Diatom Zone 24. This unit was found at EMD-7-2-0/17 
cm. and is distinguished from the upper unit by the absence of Bruniopsis mirab- 
ilis, Denticula hustedtii, Mediaria splendida, Nitzschia riedelia, and other 
species. The unit has not been correlated to paleomagnetic stratigraphy, but it 
is correlative with NN 6 of the Standard Nannoplankton Zonation (Martini, 
1971) and with the Dictyocha octacantha Silicoflagellate Zone of Martini 
(1972). Itis of Middle Miocene age. 


SPECIES FOUND IN EXPERIMENTAL MOHOLE DRILLING SAMPLES 


Genera are arranged alphabetically in the list, and species are arranged alpha- 
betically within each genus. 

Species and varieties have been identified following descriptions of Hustedt 
(1930, 1959), Sheshukova-Poretzkaya (1967), Schrader (1973a), and Hanna 
(1926, 1930, 1932). 

Descriptions and discussions are given for species not adequately treated 
in the literature. 

Species which could not be positively assigned to a known species are num- 
bered (if only one or two individuals were found) or described as new and 
illustrated. 

Holotypes and paratypes will be deposited in the California Academy of 
Sciences diatom collection. 


Genus Actinocyclus Ehrenberg 
Actinocyclus cubitus Hanna and Grant. 


Description. Hanna and Grant, 1926, p. 118, pl. 11, fig. 3. 


Actinocyclus ehrenbergi Ralfs. 


DEScRIPTION. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 525-532, numerous figures. 
Remarks. No subdivisions of this species have been made. 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 533 


Taste 4. List of samples and corresponding Department of Geology catalog numbers, 
California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco. A split of the cleaned fraction of each sample 
is stored at the California Academy of Sciences. 


Sample Number CAS Number 
EMD-6-2-30/31 54427 
EMD-10-1-30/43 54428 
EMD-8-9-5/6 54429 
EMD-8-9-140/141 54430 
EMD-8-9-193/194 54431 
EMD-8-9-240/241 54432 
EMD-8-9-290/291 54433 
EMD-8-10-44/45 54434 
EMD-8-10-100/101 54435 
EMD-8-10-200/201 54436 
EMD-8-10-300/301 54437 
EMD-8-10-400/401 54438 
EMD-8-11-30/31 54439 
EMD-8-11-90/91 54440 
EMD-8-11-200/201 54441 
EMD-8-11-300/301 54442 
EMD-8-11-390/391 54443 
EMD-8-12-94/95 54444 
EMD-8-12-203/204 54445 
EMD-8-13-30/31 54446 
EMD-8-13-100/101 54447 
EMD-8-13-262/265 54448 
EMD-8-14-10/11 54449 
EMD-8-14-100/101 54450 
EMD-8-14-400/401 54451 
EMD-8-15-35/36 54452 
EMD-8-15-93/95 54453 
EMD-8-15-100/101 54454 
EMD-8-15-200/201 54455 
EMD-8-15-300/301 54456 
EMD-8-15-504/505 54457 
EMD-7-1-5/6 54458 
EMD-7-1-41/42 54459 
EMD-7-2-0/17 54460 


Actinocyclus ellipticus Grunow. 
DEscrRIPTION. Hustedt, 1930, p. 533, fig. 303. 


Actinocyclus ellipticus var. moronensis (Deby) Kolbe. 
DEscrIPTION. Kolbe, 1954, p. 21, pl. 3, figs. 29-30. 


534 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Actinocyclus ingens Rattray. 


DESCRIPTION. Kanaya, 1971, p. 554, numerous figures. 


Actinocyclus okhotensis Jouse. 


DESCRIPTION. Koizumi, 1968, p. 208, pl. 32, figs. 7-10; Donahue, 1970, 
p. 135, pl. 2, figs. 2-5. 


Genus Asterolampra Ehrenberg 
Asterolampra grevillei (Wallich) Greville. 
DESCRIPTION. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 489-491, fig. 274. 


Asterolampra marylandica Ehrenberg. 
DEscriPTION. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 485-487, fig. 271. 


Genus Biddulphia Gray 
Biddulphia moholensis Schrader, new species. 


DescriPTION. Valve lanceolate-rhombic with produced bluntly rounded 
apices, 60 » long, 16» in the middle part, 4 » wide at the apices. Valve with 
radially arranged rows of punctae, 15 in 10 »; punctae in quincunx. Middle part 
slightly lifted from the valve surface with three spines and without any central 
area. Valves with stronger solitary spines on both sides of the median apical line 
near the valve mantle and with two to three solitary spines at both apices near 
the valve mantle. 

Discussion. No similar species was found mentioned in the literature. This 
species was placed within the genus Biddulphia because of the shape of the valve 
and the arrangement of the spines. 

Hototype. Figure 4: 3-4, from EMD-8-9-290/291 cm. California Academy 
of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54409 (diatom collection). 

DERIVATION OF NAME. This species is named ‘moholensis’ in memory of the 
Experimental Mohole Drilling. 

OccuRRENCE. Found only in the Neogene section off Baja California, in a 
sample in North Pacific Diatom Zone 11. 


Genus Bruniopsis (Tempere) Karsten 


Bruniopsis mirabilis (Brun) Karsten. 


DEscrIPTION. Kolbe, 1954, p. 24, pl. 4, fig. 44; Kanaya, 1971, p. 555. 


Genus Cladogramma Ehrenberg 
Cladogramma dubium Lohmann. 


DescripTIon. Lohmann, 1948, p. 168, pl. 9, fig. 5; Sheshukova-Poretzkaya, 
1967, p. 192, pl. 24, fig. 6, pl. 29, fig. 4. 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 535 


Genus Coscinodiscus Ehrenberg 
Coscinodiscus antiquus (Grunow) Rattray. 
DESCRIPTION. Grunow, 1884, p. 84, pl. 4 (D), fig. 24. 


Coscinodiscus moholensis Schrader, new species. 


DEscriPTION. Valve circular, 38 » in diameter, surface with a tangential 
plication, concave on one side, convex on the other. Central area absent. Areolae 
on the concave plication are round, on the convex plication they are polygonal, 
radially arranged in a complete meshwork over the valve surface. Areolae 6—7 
in 10», of about the same size all over the valve. Areolae forming fascicles. 
Margin clearly defined with a secondary plication forming triangulate uplifted 
areas 5 » wide. On top of each of these areas is one elongated areola. Margin 
well defined and separated from the valve structure by a small hyaline area. 
Margin 1-2 » wide, chambered, radially striated. 

Discussion. This species differs from all other species of the Coscinodiscus 
plicatus group in the formation of the triangulate uplifted marginal areas. No 
reference to such a form was found in the literature. 

DERIVATION OF NAME. Dedicated to the memory of the Experimental Mohole 
Drilling. 

HoLotyPe. Figure 3: 3-5 from EMD-8-13-100/101 cm. California Acad- 
emy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54410 (diatom collection). 

OccURRENCE. Found in the Neogene Section off Baja California, from a 
sample in North Pacific Diatom Zone 16. 


Coscinodiscus endoi Kanaya. 
(Figure 3: 11-12.) 

DESCRIPTION. Kanaya, 1959, pp. 76-77, pl. 3, figs. 8-11; Koizumi, 1968, 
pazii, pl. 32, figs. 21-22. 


Coscinodiscus lewisianus Greville. 
DEscripTIon. Kanaya, 1971, p. 555, pl. 40.5, figs. 4-6. 


Coscinodiscus marginatus Ehrenberg. 


DESCRIPTION. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 416-418, fig. 223. 
Discussion. No attempt has been made here to subdivide C. marginatus 
and C. marginatus var. fossilis Jouse. 


Coscinodiscus nodulifer A. Schmidt. 
DEscripTION. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 426-427, fig. 229. 


Coscinodiscus plicatus Grunow. 


DEscripTION. Grunow, 1884, p. 86, pl. 3, figs. 10, 27; Kolbe, 1954, pp. 
34-35 (no illustration) ; Schrader, 1973a, p. 703, pl. 6, fig. 23. 


536 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


‘e 

*. 

4 
e: : 

a “ 
‘be: 3 
7 ~ 
nr, «| 


if 


me 


; fo 
t\ . 


3 


7 


seeeae ; 
Giz 


& 


Ficure 1. Magnification 1000 xX, Leitz-Orthoplan, Apo Oil 92/1.40 n.A. 1. EMD-8- 
10-100/101 cm. Cussia moholensis Schrader, new species; 2. EMD-8-10-100/101 cm. 
C. moholensis, California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54414; 3. EMD- 
8-9-290/291 cm., C. moholensis (type); 4. EMD-8-9-290/291 cm., C. moholensis, California 
Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54413; 5. EMD-8-15-100/101 cm., 
C. lancettula Schrader, new species, California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology 
no. 54112; 6. EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., C. tatsunokuchiensis (Koizumi), new combination; 
7. EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., C. tatsunokuchiensis; 8. EMD-7-1-5/6 cm., C. praepaleacea 
(Schrader), new combination; 9. EMD-8-15-100/101 cm., C. lancettula (type) ; 10. EMD-8- 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 537 


Coscinodiscus symbolophorus Grunow. 
(Figure 1: 30.) 

DeEscrIPTION. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 396-398, fig. 208 (as Coscinodiscus stel- 
laris var. symbolophora (Grunow) Jorgensen); Schrader, 1973a, p. 703, pl. 22, 
figs. 8-9. 


Coscinodiscus temperei Brun. 

(Figure 2: 29-33.) 
DeEscriPTION. Kanaya, 1959, p. 84, pl. 4, fig. 8. 
Discussion. See Schrader, 1973a, p. 704. 


Coscinodiscus vetustissimus Pantocsek. 
DEscrIPTION. Hustedt, 1930, p. 412, fig. 220. 


Coscinodiscus vetustissimus var. javanicus Reinhold. 


DESCRIPTION. Reinhold, 1937, p. 102, pl. 8, figs. 7-8; Kanaya, 1971, p. 555, 
pl4orzZ: fig. 1. 


Coscinodiscus yabei Kanaya. 
(Figure 3: 6-8.) 

DEscrRIPTION. Kanaya, 1959, pp. 86-87, pl. 5, figs. 5-9; Schrader, 1973a, 
p. 704, pl. 6, figs. 1-6. 


Coscinodiscus species 1 Schrader. 


DESCRIPTION. Valve circular, 24 in diameter, surface with a tangential 
plication, concave on one side, convex on the other. Central area absent. Areolae 
round, arranged in radial rows forming a complete network over the entire valve. 
Areolae 8 in 10» and of the same size all over the valve surface. Secondary 
spiral structure of areolae well developed, interrupted by the axis of the plica- 


< 

15-100/101 cm., C. lancettula, California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 
54411; 11. EMD-8-15-93/94 cm., C. paleacea (Grunow), new combination; 12. EMD-8-15- 
93/94 cm., C. paleacea; 13. EMD-8-15-504/505 cm., C. paleacea; 14. EMD-8-15-504/505 
cm., C. paleacea; 15. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., Denticula dimorpha Schrader; 16. EMD-8- 
15-504/505 cm., D. lauta Bailey; 17. EMD-8-9-516 cm., D. lauta; 18. EMD-8-10-100/101 
cm., Cussia species 1 Schrader; 19. EMD-8-10-100/101 cm., Cussia species 1 Schrader; 
20. EMD-8-9-140/141 cm., Denticula hustedtii Simonsen and Kanaya; 21. EMD-8-9- 
140/141 cm., D. hustedtii; 22. EMD-8-15-93/94 cm., D. punctata var. hustedtii Schrader; 
23. EMD-8-15-504/505 cm., D. punctata var. hustedtii; 24. EMD-8-9-140/141 cm., D. 
punctata var. hustedtii; 25. EMD-7-2-0/17 cm., D. hyalina Schrader; 26. EMD-7-2-0/17 
cm., D. nicobarica Grunow; 27. EMD-7-1-5/6 cm., D. nicobarica; 28. EMD-8-15-300/301 
cm., Triceratium antiquum Pantocsek; 29. EMD-8-15-35/36 cm., T. cinnamomeum Greville; 
30. EMD-8-15-200/201 cm., Coscinodiscus symbolophorus Grunow; 31. EMD-8-11-30/31 
cm., Thalassiosira oestrupii (Ostenfeld) Proshkina-Lavrenko. 


538 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


», @. @,@, ~ 
717 18 19 20 “ae 


he 
+ 
21 


Ficure 2. Magnification 1000 x, Leitz-Orthoplan, Apo Oil 92/140 n.A. 1. EMD- 
8-11-30/31 cm., Thalassiosira oestruppi (Ostenfeld) Proshkina-Lavrenko; 2. EMD-8-11- 
30/31 cm., T. oestruppi; 3. RC-12-65-1915/1917.5 cm., T. species A. Burckle; 4. EMD-8- 
13-30/31 cm., T. species A. Burckle; 5. EMD-8-9-140/141 cm., T. convexa Mukhina; 
6. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., T. convexa Mukhina; 7. RC-12-65-1105/1107.5 cm., T. prae- 
convexa Burckle; 8. RC-12-65-1105/1107.5 cm., T. praeconvexa; 9. EMD-8-10-44/45 cm., 
T. praeconvexa; 10. EMD-8-10-44/45 cm., T. praeconvexa; 11. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., 
T. nativa Sheshukova-Poretzkaya; 12. EMD-8-9-140/141 cm., T. nativa; 13. EMD-8-9- 


Vor. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 539 


tion. Margin clearly defined, not separated from the meshwork, 2—2.5 » wide, 
radially striated. 

Discussion. This species differs from C. yabei Kanaya in the round areolae, 
and in the striated valve margin. It is close to Coscinodiscus flexuosus Brun but 
differs in the nonseparated valve margin, and the nonchambered margin (see 
Schrader, 1973a, p. 702). Only one specimen was observed. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 4: 13-14 from EMD-8-9-290/291 cm., a sample 
from North Pacific Diatom Zone 11. 


Coscinodiscus species 2 Schrader. 


DescriPTION. Valve circular, 15-16 » in diameter, surface with a tangential 
plication, concave on one side, convex on the other. Central area absent. Areolae 
round on the concave plication, polygonal on the convex plication, arranged 
in radial rows, forming a complete network over the entire valve. Areolae de- 
creasing in size slightly towards the margin, approximately 11 in 10. Sec- 
ondary spiral structure of the areolae well developed. Margin clearly defined, 
not separated from the meshwork, 2 p. wide, radially striated, 16 in 10 », margin 
not chambered. 

Discussion. This species is close to the above mentioned species but differs 
in the finer structure and the more finely striated margin. No similar species 
have been found in the literature. Only one specimen was observed. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 2: 34-35 from EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., a sample 
belonging to North Pacific Diatom Zone 10. 


Coscinodiscus species 3 Schrader. 


DeEscrIPTION. Valve circular, 21—22 » in diameter, surface with a tangential 
plication, concave on one side, convex on the other. Central area absent. Areolae 
round on the concave plication, polygonal on the convex plication; areolae de- 
creasing in size slightly towards the margin, 10 in 10 », arranged in radial rows, 
forming a complete network over the entire valve. Secondary radial rows present 


< 

140/141 cm., T. nativa; 14. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., T. nativa; 15. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., 
T. nativa; 16. EMD-8-9-5/6 cm., T. nativa; 17. EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., T. nativa; 
18. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., T. nativa; 19. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., T. nativa; 20. EMD- 
8-9-193/194 cm., T. nativa; 21. EMD-8-11-390/391 cm., T. nativa; 22. EMD-8-9-390/391 
cm., 7. species 2 Schrader; 23. EMD-8-9-390/391 cm., T. species 2; 24. EMD-8-9-390/391 
cm., 7. species 2; 25. EMD-8-9-5/6 cm., T. nativa Sheshukova-Poretzkaya; 26. EMD-8-9- 
5/6 cm., T. nativa; 27. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., T. species 2 Schrader; 28. EMD-8-15- 
504/505 cm., 7. species 2; 29. EMD-8-9-5/6 cm., Coscinodiscus temperei Brun; 30. EMD- 
8-9-5/6 cm., C. temperei; 31. EMD-8-9-5/6 cm., C. temperei; 32. EMD-8-10-44/45 cm., 
C. temperei; 33. EMD-8-10-44/45 cm., C. temperei; 34. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., C. species 
2 Schrader; 35. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., C. species 2; 36. EMD-7-2-0/17 cm., C. species 3 
Schrader; 37. EMD-7-2-0/17 cm., C. species 3; 38. EMD-7-2-0/17 cm., C. species 3; 
39. EMD-8-9-290/291 cm., C. yabei Kanaya; 40. EMD-8-9-290/291 cm., C. yabez. 


540 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 3. Magnification 1000 x, Leitz-Orthoplan, Apo Oil 92/1.40 n.A. 1. EMD-8-12- 
94/95 cm., Thalassiosira usatchevii Jouse; 2. EMD-8-12-94/95 cm., T. usatchevii; 3. EMD- 
8-13-100/101 cm., Coscinodiscus moholensis Schrader, new species; 4. EMD-8-13-100/101 
cm., C. moholensis; 5. EMD-8-13-100/101 cm., C. moholensis; California Academy of 
Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54410; 6. RC-12-65-2142.5/2145 cm., Coscinodiscus 
yabet Kanaya; 7. RC-12-65-2142.5/2145 cm., C. yabei; 8. RC-12-65-2142.5/2145 cm., 
C. yabei; 9. EMD-7-1-5/6 cm., Liostephania species 1 Schrader; 10. EMD-7-1-5/6 cm., 
L. species 1; 11. EMD-8-9-140/141 cm., Coscinodiscus endoi Kanaya; 12. EMD-8-9- 
140/141 cm., C. endoi; 13. EMD-8-15-504/505 cm., C. vetwustissimus Pantocsek. 


Vor. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 541 


with an interstitial mesh. Secondary spiral structure of the areolae well devel- 
oped. Margin clearly defined, not separated from the meshwork, radially striated 
12 in 10». Margin chambered with two areolae between each chamber. 

Discussion. This species is close to Coscinodiscus flexuosus Brun but dif- 
fers in the absence of a hyaline area between the valve structure and the marginal 
structure. Final taxonomic decision can only be made if more individuals are 
found. Only one specimen was observed. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 2: 36-38 from EMD-7-2-0/17 cm., a sample 
from North Pacific Diatom Zone 24. 


Genus Craspedodiscus Ehrenberg 
Craspedodiscus coscinodiscus Ehrenberg. 


DescripTION. Kolbe, 1954, p. 36, pl. 1, fig. 4; Kanaya, 1971, p. 555, pl. 40.4, 
figs. 1-3. 


Genus Cussia Schrader, new genus 


Coscinodiscus e.p. RATTRAY, 1890, p. 597, fig. 149. 

Stoschia (?) e.p. GRUNOW in Van Heurck, 1883, pl. 128, fig. 6. 
Coscinodiscus e.p. SCHRADER, 1973a. (C. paleaceus, C. praepaleaceus). 
Rhaphoneis e.p. Hajos, 1968, p. 143, pl. XLI, figs. 16-27. 

Rhaphoneis e.p. Koizumi, 1972, p. 349, pl. 42, figs. 3-4. 

DescrIPTION. Cells solitary, free. Valves elliptical-lanceolate with a sym- 
metrical and/or asymmetrical transapical axis, flat. Valve surface usually either 
with round areolae or with transapical costae forming a pennate-like surface 
ornamentation with a zigzag apical costa forming a pseudoraphe-like morpho- 
logical band; in between the costae are hyaline intercostal membranes. Valve 
center not furnished with a central area. Spines or apiculi absent. Valve margin 
usually narrow with a coarse striation. 

TYPE SPECIES. Stoschia (?) paleacea Grunow in Van Heurck, 1883, pl. 128, 
fig. 6. 

DisTRIBUTION. Widely distributed in Neogene marine sediments (Mediter- 
ranean Sea and Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian oceans). 

Discussion. Stoschia Janisch was not validly published by Janisch, but the 
description was distributed to diatomists privately by the author (Janisch, C.: 
The diatoms of the ‘‘Gazelle” Expedition, 17 plates with manuscript index, no 
date). Rattray, 1890, p. 548, combined Stoschia with Coscinodiscus and com- 
bined the species Stoschia admirabilis Janisch (circa 1888) with Coscinodiscus 
reniformis Castracane (1886, p. 160, pl. 12, fig. 12). Grunow (1883 im Van 
Heurck) established the species Stoschia paleacea; this species was newly com- 
bined by Rattray (1890, p. 597, fig. 149) and named Coscinodiscus paleaceus 
(Grunow) Rattray. As soon as the evolution of the genus under discussion was 
clarified, the taxonomic position of some other species could be detected which 
have been described under Rhaphoneis by Hajos (1968) and Koizumi (1972). 


542 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


DERIVATION OF NAME. Dedicated to the scientific vessel Cuss J, which drilled 
the Experimental Mohole Drilling. 


Cussia lancettula Schrader, new species. 


DEscriPTIon. Valves elliptical-lanceolate with acute rounded ends. 24-70 pu 
long, 4-7 » wide. Transapical axis symmetrical. Valve surface flat with trans- 
apical costae, 10-12 in 10 », slightly curved near the apices. Transapical costae 
not divided in the middle part, divided and in decussate arrangement towards the 
apices, connected in the middle by an apical zigzag line which simulates a pseudo- 
raphe. Intercostal membranes homogenous even in oblique light. Margin not 
separated from the valve structure. 

Discussion. This species differs from Cussia praepaleacea in that the margin 
is not separated, and the transapical structure is simple. 

DERIVATION OF NAME. From the Latin word ‘lancea’ meaning ‘lance.’ 

Hototype. Figure 1: 9-10 from EMD-8-15-100/101 cm., a sample from 
North Pacific Diatom Zone 19. California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology no. 54411 (diatom collection). 

PARATYPE. Figure 1: 5. California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology no. 54412 (diatom collection). 


Cussia mediopunctata (Hajos), new combination. 
Raphoneis mediopunctata Hajos, 1968, p. 143, pl. XLI, figs. 16-27. 


Discussion. The illustrations of Hajos verify this new combination. The 
girdle view is most characteristic, as are the other mentioned morphological 
features. Unfortunately the micrographs do not show clearly if as stated “in der 
Langsmittellinie der Schalen zieht sich eine Punktreihe.” This species is close to 
Cussia moholensis but differs in the presence of round areolae. 


Cussia mediopunctata var. matraensis (Hajos), new combination. 


Raphoneis mediopunctata var. matraensis Hajos, 1968, p. 144, pl. XLII, figs. 1-5. 


Cussia moholensis Schrader, new species. 


DEscrIPTION. Valves elliptical-lanceolate with acute apices, 76-85 » long, 
9-10 » wide. Transapical axis symmetrical. Valve surface flat with marginal 
transapical costae 7 in 10 » and extending 2-3 » into the valve surface. In be- 
tween the marginal transapical costae are round areolae. Valve surface with 
scattered, sometimes transapically orientated costae, which form a pseudoraphe- 
like medium apical zigzag line. Intercostal membranes homogenous even in 
oblique light. 

Discussion. This species differs from Cussia lancettula in having scattered 
medium costae and wider valves. 

DERIVATION OF NAME. Dedicated to the memory of the Experimental Mohole 
Drilling. 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 543 


Hototype. Figure 1: 3-4 from EMD-8-9-290/291 cm., a sample from North 
Pacific Diatom Zone 11. California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geol- 
ogy no. 54413 (diatom collection). 

PARATYPE. Figure 1: 1-2. California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology no. 54414 (diatom collection). 


Cussia paleacea (Grunow), new combination. 
(Figure 1: 11-14.) 


Stoschia paleacea GRUNOW in Van Heurck, 1883, pl. 128, fig. 6. 
Coscinodiscus paleaceus (Grunow) RATTRAY, 1890, p. 597, fig. 149. 
Coscinodiscus paleaceus (Grunow) Ratrray, in Schrader, 1973a, p. 703, pl. 3, figs. 10-12. 


DEscripTION. Kolbe, 1954, p. 34, pl. 3, fig. 32. 


Cussia praepaleacea (Schrader), new combination. 
(Figure 1: 8.) 


Coscinodiscus praepaleaceus SCHRADER, 1973a, p. 703, pl. 3, figs. 1-9. 


DescripTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 703, pl. 3, figs. 1-9. 


Cussia tatsunokuchiensis (Koizumi), new combination. 
(Figure 1: 6-7.) 


Raphoneis tatsunokuchiensis KoizuMt, 1972, p. 349, pl. 42, figs. 3-4. 


DEscriPTION. Koizumi, 1972, p. 349, pl. 42, figs. 3-4. 


Cussia species 1 Schrader. 


Discussion. Only two fragments were found with coarsely punctated trans- 
apical lines, 7 in 10 », the punctae forming straight-apical lines. Middle structure 
separated from the marginal line of punctae by a hyaline area parallel to the mar- 
gin. No mention of similar species has been found in the literature. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 1: 18-19. 


Genus Denticula Kiitzing 


Denticula dimorpha Schrader. 
(Figure 1: 15.) 


DescripTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 704, pl. 1, fig. 42. 


Denticula hustedtii Simonsen and Kanaya. 
(Figure 1: 20-21.) 


DESCRIPTION. Simonsen and Kanaya, 1961, p. 501, pl. 1, figs. 19-25, pl. 2, 
figs. 36-47. 


544 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Ficure 4. Magnification 1000 x, Leitz-Orthoplan, Apo Oil 92/1.40 n.A. 1. EMD-8-9- 
290/291 cm., Coscinodiscus plicatus Grun; 2. EMD-8-9-290/291 cm., C. plicatus; 3. EMD- 
8-9-290/291 cm., Biddulphia moholensis Schrader, new species; 4. EMD-8-9-290/291 cm., 
B. moholensis, California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54409; 5. EMD- 
8-10-100/101 cm., Coscinodiscus yabei Kanaya; 6. EMD-8-10-100/101 cm., C. yabei; 
7. EMD-8-10-100/101 cm., C. yabei; 8. EMD-8-10-100/101 cm., C. yabei; 9. EMD- 
8-10-100/101 cm., C. yabei; 10. EMD-8-10-100/101 cm., C. yabei; 11. EMD-8-10-300/301 
cm., C. plicatus Grunow; 12. EMD-8-10-300/301 cm., C. plicatus; 13. EMD-8-9-290/291 
cm., C. species 1 Schrader; 14. EMD-8-9-290/291 cm., C. species 1. 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 545 


Denticula hyalina Schrader. 
(Figure 1: 25.) 


DEscrRIPTION. Schrader, 1973a, pp. 704-705, pl. 1, figs. 12-20, 22. 


Denticula hyalina var. hustedtii Schrader. 


DESCRIPTION. Schrader, 1973b, p. 418, pl. 1, fig. 9. 


Denticula lauta Bailey. 
(Figure 1: 16-17.) 


DEscRIPTION. Simonsen and Kanaya, 1961, pp. 500-501, pl. 1, figs. 1-8. 


Denticula nicobarica Grunow. 
(Figure 1: 26-27.) 


DESCRIPTION. Simonsen and Kanaya, 1961, p. 503, pl. 1, figs. 11-13. 


Denticula punctata Schrader. 
DescripTIon. Schrader, 1973a, p. 705, pl. 1, figs. 27-28, 25-26. 


Denticula punctata var. hustedtii Schrader. 
(Figure 1: 22-24.) 


DescriPTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 705, pl. 1, figs. 23-24. 


Genus Ethmodiscus Castracane 
Ethmodiscus rex (Rattray) Hendey. 
DEscripTIon. Hendey, 1953, pp. 51-57, pl. 1, figs. 1-6, pl. 2, figs. 1-3. 


Genus Hemiaulus Ehrenberg 
Hemiaulus cf. H. polymorphus Grunow. 


DESCRIPTION. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 880-881, figs. 525-526. 
Discussion. The specimens which are tentatively identified here as Hemi- 
aulus polymorphus differ from the original description in the lack of pseudoseptae. 


Genus Hemidiscus Wallich 
Hemidiscus cuneiformis Wallich. 


DEscriPTION. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 904-907, fig. 542. 


Hemidiscus simplicissimus Hanna and Grant. 


DeEscripTIon. Hanna and Grant, 1926, p. 147, pl. 16, fig. 13; Schrader, 
1973a, p. 706, pl. 24, figs. 12-13. 


546 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Genus Liostephania Ehrenberg 
Liostephania species 1 Schrader. 


Discussion. Flat silicified disks belonging to this genus were found occa- 
sionally with a moderately well preserved diatom association. Hanna and Brigger 
(1970) pointed out that these disks are silicified remains of inner chambers of 
either Asterolampra or Asteromphalus. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 3: 9-10. 

Genus Lithodesmium Ehrenberg 
Lithodesmium californicum Grunow. 


DEscripTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 706, pl. 12, figs. 11, 20. 


Lithodesmium minusculum Grunow. 


DescriPTIon. Schrader, 1973a, p. 706, pl. 12, fig. 7. 


Genus Macrora Hanna (not a diatom genus, taxonomic position uncertain) 
Macrora stella (Azpeitia) Hanna. 


DEscrIPTION. Hanna, 1932, p. 196, pl. 12, fig. 7. 


Genus Mediaria Sheshukova-Poretzkaya 
Mediaria splendida Sheshukova-Poretzkaya. 
DeEscripTION. Sheshukova-Poretzkaya, 1967, p. 306, pl. 47, fig. 14, pl. 48, 
fig. 8. 
Genus Melosira Agardh 
Melosira sulcata (Ehrenberg) Kiitzing. 
Description. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 276-278, figs. 118-120. 


Genus Nitzschia Hassal 
Nitzschia californica Schrader. 
DESCRIPTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 707, pl. 26, fig. 6; pl. 5; aieueiae 
Nitzschia cylindrica Burckle. 
(Figure 5: 23-30.) 
DeEscripTIoNn. Burckle, 1972, pp. 239-240, pl. 2, figs. 1-6. 


Nitzschia burcklia Schrader, new species. 


DeEscrIPTION. Valve elliptical with slightly convex margins and broadly 
rounded apices. 30-33 » long, 5 » wide. Transapical costae 11-12 in 10. In 


Vor. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 547 


between the middle two costae one ‘secondary’ costa is inserted which is small 
and derives at the central nodule. Intercostal membranes hyaline, even in oblique 
light. Transapical costae and intercostal membranes straight in transapical 
direction, reaching the well developed apical field. Apical field with 2—3 apical 
costae. Keel well developed, keel punctae 11 in 10». Central nodule present, 
raphe marginal. 

Discussion. This species differs from the allied species N. riedelia, N. 
rolandii, N. kanayensis in the presence of the ‘secondary transapical costae’ in 
the middle of the valves. 

DERIVATION OF NAME. Dedicated to Dr. Lloyd Burckle of Lamont-Doherty 
Geological Observatory, New York. 

HototyPe. Figure 6: 29 from EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., a sample from North 
Pacific Diatom Zone 10. California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology 
no. 54415 (diatom collection). 

PARATYPE. Figure 6: 30. California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology no. 54416 (diatom collection). 


Nitzschia cf. N. heteropolica Schrader. 
(Figure 5: 42.) 
DescripTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 707, pl. 26, figs. 1-2. 


Discussion. Only one fragment was found in the EMD samples and thus 
a positive identification could not be made. 


Nitzschia invisa Schrader. 
(Figure 6: 31.) 


DescripTIoNn. Schrader, 1973a, p. 707, pl. 26, fig. 5. 


Nitzschia jouseae Burckle. 
DescripTIon. Burckle, 1972, p. 240, pl. 2, figs. 17-21. 


Nitzschia kanayensis Schrader, new species. 


DescripPTIoN. Valves elliptical with slightly convex margins, 18-25 » long, 
4—4.5 » wide, apices broadly rounded. Transapical costae 13-16 in 10 p, straight 
transapical in the middle part of the valve, slightly convex towards the apices. 
Apical field well developed with 2—3 apical costae. Intercostal membranes hya- 
line even in oblique light. Raphe marginal, keel indistinct; keel punctae hardly 
visible, about 17 in 10 » (compare fig. 6: 28). 

Discussion. This species is close to Nitzschia rolandii and N. riedelia but 
differs in the finer structure and the apical fields. 

DERIVATION OF NAME. Dedicated to Dr. Taro Kanaya. 

HoLotypPe. Figure 6: 23 from EMD-8-15-200/201 cm., a sample from North 


548 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Pacific Diatom Zone 20. California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology 
no. 54417 (diatom collection). 

PARATYPES. Figure 6: 25, 28. California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology nos. 54418, 54426 (diatom collection). 

OccuRRENCE. Found only in the Neogene section off Baja California and 
at DSDP Site 173. 


Nitzschia miocenica Burckle. 
(Figure 5: 17-22.) 


DescripTIon. Burckle, 1972, pp. 240-241, pl. 2, figs. 10-15. 


Nitzschia moholensis Schrader, new species. 


DEscrRIPTION. Valves elliptical with convex margins and slightly capitate 
apices. Apices heteromorph. 26 » long, 5 » wide in the middle. Transapical costae 
10 in 10 p, straight in transapical direction in the middle of the valves, slightly 
curved towards the apices. Intercostal membranes with two rows of punctae (20 
in 10 »), punctae in decussate arrangement 10 in 10 ». Raphe marginal, central 
nodule absent, keel indistinct; keel punctae about 10 in 10 p. 

Discussion. No similar species has been found mentioned in the literature. 

DERIVATION OF NAME. Dedicated to the memory of the Experimental Mohole 
Drilling. 

HototyrPe. Figure 6: 10-11 from EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., a sample from 
North Pacific Diatom Zone 14. California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology no. 54419 (diatom collection). 

OccuRRENCE. Found only in the Neogene section of Baja California. 


Nitzschia porteri Burckle non Frenguelli. 
(Figure 5: 31-32.) 

DeEscripTIon. Burckle, 1972, no description, pl. 2, fig. 16. 

Discussion. Frenguelli, 1949, p. 116, pl. 1, fig. 33-34 described a species 
with “elongato-ovalibus” valves and “striis transversis delicatis, 12-13 in 10 p.” 
Burckle’s figured specimen has elliptical valves with parallel margins and distinct 
transapical intercostal membranes with one row of punctae and transapical costae 
which form a slight angle with the transapical direction. I have not yet changed 
the name because of lack of the original Frenguelli material from Tiltil y Mejil- 
lones. 


Nitzschia praereinholdii Schrader. 
(Figure 6: 1-9, 13-15.) 
DEscripTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 708, pl. 5, figs. 24-25, 20, 23, 26. 


Nitzschia cf. N. praereinholdii Schrader. 
(Figure 6: 16-19.) 


VoLt. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 549 


DescripTIion. Schrader, 1973a, p. 708, pl. 5, figs. 20, 23-26. 

Discussion. Specimens (from EMD-8-9-240/241 cm.) have been placed 
doubtfully in NV. praereinholdii because they possess bent raphe bars near the 
apices similar to Nitzschia marina Grunow. 


Nitzschia riedelia Schrader, new species. 


DESCRIPTION. Valves elliptical with slightly convex margins and broadly 
rounded apices, 22-30 » long, 5—6 » wide in the middle of the valves. Transapical 
costae straight in transapical direction in the middle part of the valve, curved 
near the apices, 11-13 in 10» in the middle becoming closer near the apices, 
approximately 15 in 10 ». Intercostal membranes hyaline even in oblique light. 
Apical field not developed. Raphe marginal, central nodule absent, keel distinct, 
about 15 keel-punctae in 10 p. 

Discussion. This species is close to V. burcklia but differs in the absence 
of apical fields and a central nodule. It is close to NV. rolandii but differs in 
having finer transapical costae, no central nodule, and hyaline intercostal mem- 
branes noticeable even in oblique light. 

DERIVATION OF NAME. Dedicated to W. R. Riedel of Scripps Institution of 
Oceanography, La Jolla. 

Hototype. Figure 6: 21 from EMD-8-15-504/505 cm., a sample from North 
Pacific Diatom Zone 21. California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geol- 
ogy no. 54420 (diatom collection). 

PaRATYPE. Figure 6: 20. California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology no. 54421 (diatom collection). 

OcCURRENCE. Found in North Pacific sediments of Middle Miocene age. 


Nitzschia rolandii Schrader. 
DescriPTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 708, pl. 5, fig. 31, pl. 26, figs. 3-5. 


Nitzschia seiboldia Schrader, new species. 


Description. Valves elliptical with slightly convex margins, and broadly 
rounded apices. 28—45 » long, 5—6 » wide in the middle of the valves. Transapi- 
cal costae straight. in transapical direction in the middle of the valve and be- 
coming curved towards the apices, 12 in 10 ». Intercostal membranes punctated, 
with two rows of fine punctae neighboured to the transapical costae. Punctae in 
decussate arrangement, approximately 20-25 in 10 ». Raphe marginal, keel dis- 
tinct with about 11 keel punctae in 10 », central nodule absent. Apices dimorph, 
one apex with downwards curved transapical costae, the other with curved trans- 
apical costae, apical field absent. 

Discussion. This species is close to Nitzschia species 2 Schrader (Schrader, 
1973a, p. 708, pl. 5, figs. 16-18); no other similar species has been found in the 
literature. Specimens from the EMD generally are broken, and some are twisted 


550 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


se | 


A ees 


HEED 


tit 


fPeveses Tra 
pempznt +: 
amit nth 


cit 
sikt 


7 


Ht) 


22 23 24 25 


i 


HU 


> 
“ ere er ve 


w 
°o 


pir 


rs 


=| = 
—= 
—- 
=) fi 
= = —| 
SS SS 
43 44 
Ficure 5. Magnification 1000 x, Leitz-Orthoplan, Apo Oil 92/1.40 n.A. 1. EMD-8-9- 


193/194 cm., Thalassionema nitzschioides Grunow; 2. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., T. nitzschi- 
oides; 3. EMD-8-15-300/301 cm., Synedra jouseana Sheshukova-Poretzkaya; 4. EMD-8-15- 


504/505 cm., Thalassionema nitzschioides Grunow; 5. EMD-8-15-504/505 cm., T. nitzschi- 
oides; 6. EMD-8-15-504/505 cm., T. nitzschioides, aberrant specimens; 7. EMD-8-9- 
240/241 cm., T. hirosakiensis (Kanaya) Schrader; 8. EMD-8-15-200/201 cm., Rowuxia 
naviculoides Schrader; 9. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., R. moholensis Schrader, new species; 
10. EMD-8-11-30/31 cm., R. cf. R. naviculoides Schrader; 11. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., 


Vor. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 551 


in apical direction (the author found numerous individuals in samples from San 
Felipe CAS no. 39904 (Hanna in Hertlein, 1968) ). 

DERIVATION OF NAME. Dedicated to Prof. E. Seibold, who encouraged the 
author during many years with advice and help. 

Hototyre. Figure 5: 40-41 from EMD-8-15-300/301 cm., a sample from 
North Pacific Diatom Zone 21. California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology no. 54422 (diatom collection). 

PaRATYPE. Figure 5: 45. California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology no. 54423 (diatom collection). 


Nitzschia species. 


The following Nitzschia species are treated informally and assigned numbers, 
because they were found only once, or found only as fragments. The corrected 
taxonomic assignments will require additional or better preserved specimens. 


Nitzschia species 3 Schrader. 


Discussion. Valve linear-elliptical, 15 » long, 4 » wide. 13 transapical costae 
in 10. This species is close to Nitzschia porteri Burckle non Frenguelli, but 
differs in the smaller size, in the heteropol apical fields, and in the finer struc- 
ture of the intercostal membranes. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 5: 33-34. 


= 


R. moholensis Schrader, new species (type); 12. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., R. moholensis, 
California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54424; 13. EMD-8-9-240/241 
cm., R. species 1 Schrader; 14. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., R. californica M. Peragallo; 
15. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., R. californica; 16. RC-12-65-1915/1917.5 cm., WNitzschia 
porteri Burckle non Frenguelli; 17. RC-12-65-1105/1107.5 cm., N. miocenica Burckle; 
18. RC-12-65-1105/1107.5 cm., N. miocenica; 19. RC-12-65-1105/1107.5 cm., N. miocenica; 
20. RC-12-65-1105/1107.5 cm., N. miocenica; 21. RC-12-65-1105/1107.5 cm., N. miocenica; 
22. RC-12-65-1105/1107.5 cm., N. miocenica (girdle view); 23. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., 
N. cylindrica Burckle; 24. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., N. cylindrica; 25. EMD-8-10-100/101 
cm., NV. cylindrica; 26. EMD-8-10-100/101 cm., NV. cylindrica; 27. EMD-8-10-100/101 cm., 
Nitzschia cylindrica Burckle; 28. EMD-8-10-100/101 cm., N. cylindrica; 29. EMD-8-10- 
100/101 cm., N. cylindrica; 30. EMD-8-10-100/101 cm., N. cylindrica; 31. EMD-8-10- 
44/45 cm., N. porteri Burckle non Frenguelli; 32. EMD-8-10-44/45 cm., N. porteri; 
33. EMD-8-10-44/45 cm., NV. species 3 Schrader; 34. EMD-8-10-44/45 cm., N. species 3; 
35. EMD-8-15-100/101 cm., NV. species 7 Schrader; 36. EMD-8-15-100/101 cm., N. species 
7; 37. EMD-8-15-200/201 cm., N. species 8 Schrader; 38. EMD-8-15-200/201 cm., N. 
species 8; 39. EMD-8-15-200/201 cm., NW. species 8; 40. EMD-8-15-300/301 cm., WN. 
setboldia Schrader, new species (type); 41. EMD-8-15-300/301 cm., NV. seiboldia (type), 
California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54422; 42. EMD-8-15-200/201 
cm., Nitzschia~cf. N. heteropolica Schrader; 43. EMD-8-15-504/505 cm., N. species 4 
Schrader; 44. EMD-8-15-504/505 cm., N. species 4; 45. EMD-8-15-300/301 cm., N. 
seiboldia Schrader new species, California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology 
no. 54423. 


552 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Is 


eee th 1 
was 
LA Be 


3 
add 
eauet 


ee 
up 
ee 


ii, 


7 sing 3 
bee | oa 
Re ay 
as as 
r vj 


J 


a al 


p C: 


HAH 


ill 


mM 


es 
if 


teenthelie 


ean 


20 23 


25 26 27 28 29 


22 


Ficure 6. Magnification 1000 x, Leitz-Orthoplan, Apo Oil 92/1.40 n.A. 1. EMD-8- 
11-300/301 cm., Nitzschia praereinholdii Schrader; 2. EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., N. prae- 
reinholdii; 3. EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., N. praeveinholdii; 4. EMD-8-11-30/31 cm., JN. 
praereinholdi; 5. EMD-8-11-30/31 cm., N. praereinholdi; 6. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., 
N. praereinholdii; 7. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., N. praereinholdit; 8. EMD-8-9-193/194 cm., 
N. praereinholdii; 9. EMD-6-2-30/31 cm., N. praereinholdit; 10. EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., 
N. moholensis Schrader, new species (type); 11. EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., N. moholensis 
(type), California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54419; 12. EMD-8- 
11-390/391 cm., NV. species 5 Schrader; 13. EMD-6-2-30/31 cm., N. praereinholdi Schrader; 
14. EMD-6-2-30/31 cm., N. praereinholdii; 15. EMD-6-2-30/31 cm., N. praereinholdii; 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 553 


Nitzschia species 4 Schrader. 


Discussion. Only fragments have been found. They display a central nod- 
ulus, a marginal well defined keel with 9 keel punctae in 10 » and 17 transapical 
costae in 10. Intercostal membranes with one row of punctae. No similar 
species has been observed in the literature. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 5: 43-44. 


Nitzschia species 5 Schrader. 


Discussion. Only one fragment has been found. It has 9 transapical costae 
in 10 », intercostal membranes with double rows of small punctae in decussate 
arrangement, rows near the transapical costae. This species is close to Nitzschia 
reinholdii Kanaya but differs from the latter in the lanceolate valve, the arrange- 
ment of keel punctae, here 9 in 10 », and the finer punctated intercostal mem- 
branes. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 6: 12. 


Nitzschia species 6 Schrader. 


Discussion. Valve elliptical with convex margins, 22 » long, 8 » wide, with 
12 transapical costae in 10 », slightly convex near the apices. Intercostal mem- 
branes hyaline even in oblique light, with about 14 keel punctae in 10 ». This 
species is close to Nitzschia invisa Schrader but differs from it in the coarser 
arrangement of transapical costae. It is also similar to Nitzschia porteri Fren- 
guelli, but owing to the fact that I have not seen a NV. porteri from Tiltil the 
correct taxonomic position could not be ascertained. Nitzschia porteri possesses 
12—13 keel punctae in 10 » and 12-13 transapical striae in 10 p. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 6: 32. 


Ps 
16. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., Nitzschia cf. N. praereinholdii; 17. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., 
Nitzschia cf. N. praereinholdii; 18. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., Nitzschia cf. N. praereinholdii; 
19. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., Nitsschia cf. N. praereinholdii; 20. EMD-7-1-41/42 cm., 
N. riedelia Schrader, new species, California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology 
no. 54421; 21. EMD-8-15-504/505 cm., NV. riedelia (type), California Academy of Sciences, 
Department of Geology no. 54420; 22. EMD-8-15-504/505 cm., N. rolandii Schrader; 
23. EMD-8-15-200/201 cm., N. kanayensis Schrader, new species (type), California 
Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54417; 24. EMD-8-15-93/94 cm., N. 
rolandi Schrader; 25. EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., N. kanayensis Schrader, new species, 
California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54418; 26. EMD-8-11-300/301 
cm., N. rolandii Schrader; 27. EMD-8-10-44/45 cm., N. rolandiit; 28. EMD-8-9-240/241 
cm., N. kanayensis Schrader, new species, California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology no. 54426; 29. EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., N. burcklia Schrader, new species (type), 
California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54415; 30. EMD-8-9-240/241 
cm., N. burcklia, California Academy of Sciences, Department of Geology no. 54416; 
31. EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., NV. invisa Schrader; 32. EMD-8-11-300/301 cm., N. species 6 
Schrader. 


554 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Nitzschia species 7 Schrader. 

Discussion. Only one fragment of this small Nitzschia species has been 
observed. It is 15 » long, 6 » wide, with 11-12 transapical costae in 10 », curved 
near the apices; intercostal membranes have two rows of punctae with punctae 
in decussate arrangement. No similar species has been observed in the literature. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 5: 35-36. 

Nitzschia 8 Schrader. 


Discussion. Only one specimen has been observed. It is 23 » long, 7 » wide, 
with 9 transapical costae in 10 ,; intercostal membranes finely punctated. 
Apices heteropol. Transapical costae curved near the apices. Keel distinct, with 
9 keel punctae in 10 ». No similar species has been observed in the literature. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 5: 37-39. 


Genus Rhaphoneis Ehrenberg 


Rhaphoneis angularis Lohmann. 
Description. Lohmann, 1938, pp. 92—93, pl. 22, figs. 6-8. 


Rhaphoneis angustata Pantocsek. 

DescripTIon. Sheshukova-Poretzkaya, 1967, pp. 241-242, pl. 41, fig. 8, 
pl. 43, fig. 2. 
Rhaphoneis margaritalimbata Mertz. 


DEscrIPTION. Mertz, 1966, p. 27, pl. 6, figs. 1-3. 


Rhaphoneis sacchalinensis Sheshukova-Poretzkaya. 


Description. Sheshukova-Poretzkaya, 1967, p. 242, pl. 42, fig. 2. 


Genus Rhizosolenia Ehrenberg 
Rhizosolenia barboi Brun. 
Description. Donahue, 1970, p. 136; Schrader, 1973a, p. 709, pl. 24, figs. 
4-7, 


Rhizosolenia hebetata forma hiemalis Gran. 
DEscriPTION. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 590-592, fig. 337. 


Rhizosolenia miocenica Schrader. 
DescripTIon. Schrader, 1973a, p. 709, pl. 10, figs. 2-6, 9-11. 


Rhizosolenia praealata Schrader. 
DESCRIPTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 709, pl. 10, fig. 13. 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 555 


Rhizosolenia praebarboi Schrader. 
DescriPTIon. Schrader, 1973a, pp. 709-710, pl. 24, figs. 1-3. 


Rhizosolenia styliformis Brightwell. 
DescriPTIOoNn. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 584-588, figs. 333-335. 


Genus Rouxia Brun and Heéribaud 
Rouxia californica M. Peragallo. 
DEscriPTIon. Hanna, 1930, pp. 186-188, pl. 14, figs. 6-7. 


Rouxia moholensis Schrader, new species. 


DEscrIPTION. Valves linear-oblong with parallel margins slightly constricted 
in the middle. Apices broadly rounded, 35-42 » long, 6 » wide in the middle. The 
two rudimentary raphe bars widely separated and situated near the apices. 
Transapical striae 18 in 10 », transapical in the middle of the valve, becoming 
radial towards the apices. Transapical striae formed by elliptical pores. No api- 
cal lines are present. Axial area narrow, central area thin-elongated. Valves 
isopol. 

Discussion. This species differs from Rouxia diploneides in its finer struc- 
ture and lack of apical lines. 

DERIVATION OF NAME. Dedicated in memory of the Experimental Mohole 
Drilling. 

Hototyre. Figure 5: 11-12 from EMD-8-9-240/241 cm., a sample from 
North Pacific Diatom Zone 10. California Academy of Sciences, Department of 
Geology no. 54424 (diatom collection). 

OccuRRENCE. Found in the Neogene Section off Baja California. 


Rouxia naviculoides Schrader. 
(Figure 5: 8.) 
DescriIPTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 710, pl. 3, figs. 27-32. 


Rouxia cf. R. naviculoides Schrader. 
(Figure 5: 10.) 

Discusston. Specimens found are tentatively placed in R. naviculoides, but 
they differ from others of that species in the butterflylike arrangement of the 
central area. 


Rouxia species 1 Schrader. 


Discussion. Only one specimen of this species was found. It is close to R. 
moholensis but differs in the coarser structure, and in the presence of one apical 
line near the middle axis. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 5: 13. 


556 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Genus Stephanopyxis Ehrenberg 


Stephanopyxis turris (Greville and Arnotte) Ralfs. 
DeEscripTIon. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 304-307, figs. 140-144. 


Genus Synedra Ehrenberg 


Synedra jouseana Sheshukova-Poretzkaya. 
Description. Sheshukova-Poretzkaya, 1967, p. 245: Schrader, 1973a, 
p: 710, pl. 23. figs... 21=23, 25, 38; 


Genus Thalassionema Grunow 


Thalassionema hirosakiensis (Kanaya) Schrader. 
(Figure 5: 7.) 


DESCRIPTION. Kanaya, 1959, pp. 104-106, pl. 9, figs. 11-15; Schrader, 
1O73a. ip. UL, ple 23, tigs..31=33°: 


Thalassionema claviformis Schrader. 


DESCRIPTION. Schrader, 1973a, p. 711, pl. 23, figs. 11, 15. 


Thalassionema nitzschioides Grunow. 
(Figure 5: 1-2, 4-6.) 
DESCRIPTION. Hustedt, 1959, pp. 244-246, fig. 725; Hasle, 1967, p. 111, 
figs. 5, 27-34, 39-44. 
Genus Thalassiosira Cleve 
Thalassiosira convexa Mukhina. 
(Figure 2: 5-6.) 


Description. Donahue, 1970, pp. 136-137, pl. 3, figs. a-f. 


Thalassiosira decipiens (Grunow) Joergensen. 


DEscRIPTION. Hustedt, 1930, pp. 322-323, fig. 158. 


Thalassiosira excentrica (Ehrenberg) Cleve. 


Description. Sheshukova-Poretzkaya, 1967, pp. 141-142, pl. 14, fig. 4. 


Thalassiosira antiqua (Grunow) Cleve. 


DeEscriPpTION. Sheshukova-Poretzkaya, 1967, pp. 143-144, pl. 14, fig. 3. 


Thalassiosira species A Burckle. 
(Figure 2: 3-4.) 


DescripTIONn. Burckle, 1972, p. 241, pl. 1, fig. 1. 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 557 


Thalassiosira nativa Sheshukova-Poretzkaya. 
(Figure 2: 11-21, 25-26.) 
DescripTIon. Sheshukova-Poretzkaya, 1967, p. 145, pl. 14, fig. 7. 


Thalassiosira praeconvexa Burckle. 
(Figure 2: 7-10.) 
DeEscripTIon. Burckle, 1972, pp. 241-242, pl. 2, figs. 7-9. 


Thalassiosira oestrupii (Ostenfeld) Proshkina-Lavrenko. 
(Figure 1: 31; Figure 2: 1-2.) 
DescripTion. Hustedt, 1930, p. 318, fig. 155 as Coscinosira oestruppi. 


Thalassiosira usatchevii Jouse. 
(Figure 3: 1-2.) 
DeEscripTIoN. Sheshukova-Poretzkaya, 1967, p. 150, pl. 15, fig. 3. 


Thalassiosira species 2 Schrader. 


Discussion. This species is close to Thalassiosira nativa but differs in 
lacking numerous scattered strutted tubuli in the center. No other similar species 
were found mentioned in the literature. 

FIGURED SPECIMEN. Figure 2: 22-24, 27-28. 


Genus Thalassiothrix Cleve and Grunow 


Thalassiothrix longissima Cleve and Grunow. 
DescripTIon. Hasle, 1967, p. 114, fig. 20. 


Genus Triceratium Ehrenberg 
Triceratium antiquum Pantocsek. 
(Figure 1: 28.) 


DESCRIPTION. Pantocsek, 1886, p. 51, pl. 13, fig. 115; Azpeitia, 1911, p. 221, 
plal2, tie. 2. 


Triceratium cinnamomeum Greville. 
(Figure 1: 29.) 


DeEscriPTIon. Greville, 1863, p. 232, pl. 9, fig. 12. 


Triceratium condecorum Brightwell. 


DeEscriPTIon. Hanna, 1932, p. 221, pl. 17, figs. 1, 3. 


SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 


(1) The North Pacific Diatom Zonation as established from cores obtained 
during the DSDP leg 18, north of 35° North longitude. provided a basis 


558 


(4) 


(6) 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [PRroc. 4TH SER. 


for establishing a diatom stratigraphy of core samples from the Experi- 
mental Mohole Drilling site off Guadalupe Island, Mexico. 


Paleoclimatic oscillations found at the EMD site are comparable to those 
found at DSDP leg 18, Site 173; no warm period was detected comparable 
to those found in Lamont Doherty Cores south of 10° longitude. 


North Pacific Diatom Zones 20 to 24 are correlative with the lower part of 
the Corbisema triacantha Silicoflagellate Zone and the upper part of the 
Dictyocha octacantha Silicoflagellate Zone of Martini (1972), and with 
NN 6 Standard Nannoplankton Zone of Martini (1971). 


The base of the Late Miocene as defined by Burckle (1972), as occurring 
within Geomagnetic Epoch 11 of the tropics, and as defined by Bolli (1957) 
as the Globorotalia mayeri Zone below the Globorotalia menardii Zone, is 
correlative with North Pacific Diatom Zone 19, and in the Experimental 
Mohole Drilling it is between samples EMD-8-15-100/101 cm. and EMD- 
8-15-200/201 cm. This boundary is correlative (chart 4) with the Corbr- 
sema triacantha Silicoflagellate Zone (Martini, 1972), with the NN 6 Zone 
of the Standard Nannoplankton Zone of Martini (1971), with the Luisian 
stage of California (Parker, 1964; Kanaya, 1971; Bandy and Ingle, 1970). 
Berggren (1972) placed the Middle to Late Miocene boundary within the 
upper part of the N 15 Standard Foraminiferal Zone and indicated a radio- 
metric age of 13.5 m.y. for the Luisian-Mohnian boundary, which correlates 
with the Late to Middle Miocene boundary of Bandy and Ingle (1970). 
The different correlations are compared in charts 3 and 4. 

Dymond (1966) determined a Potassium-Argon date of 12.3 = 0.4 m.y. 
for a glass sample from EMD-8-15-89 cm. This date agrees with the 
correlation of the base of North Pacific Diatom Zone 19 with the paleo- 
magnetic scale, and the correlation of the paleomagnetic scale with the 
radiometric time scale (Berggren, 1972). 


The Pliocene-Late Miocene boundary as defined by Burckle (1972) is at 
the end of Geomagnetic Epoch 5 at about 5.5 million years B.P. In the 
Experimental Mohole Drilling this boundary is between samples EMD-8- 
10-44/45 cm. and EMD-8-10-100/101 cm., and it correlates with the 
Dictyocha pseudofibula Silicoflagellate Zone of Martini (1972), with the 
NN 10 Standard Nannoplankton Zone of Martini (1971), and with the 
upper Mohnian Stage of Bandy and Ingle (1970). 


The sedimentation rate for the Experimental Mohole Drilling Core in the 
interval from 80—95 meters below the sea floor, is about 7 meters/million 
years; for the interval from 95 to 115 meters it is approximately 30 m./m.y., 
and for the interval from 115 to 135 meters below the sea floor approxi- 
mately it is again 7 m./m.y. The abrupt increase of sedimentation rate 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 559 


corresponds with the increase of silt sized minerals and sponge spicules. The 
sedimentation rate determined by correlation of North Pacific Diatom Zones 
to paleomagnetic stratigraphy and hence to the radiometric time scale, 
differs from that obtained by using Dymond’s (1966) Potassium-Argon 
dates (charts 4, 5). 


(7) Published correlations of planktonic marine diatoms (Kanaya, 1971), of 
planktonic foraminiferans (Parker, 1964; Bandy and Ingle, 1970) with the 
Californian Marine Stages contain discrepancies which could not be resolved 
in this paper because of a lack of stratotype diatom-bearing material from 
California [the North Pacific Diatom Zones have not yet been correlated 
to the Californian Marine Stages]. 


REFERENCES 


AspEL-MoneM, A., N. D. WATKINS, AND P. W. Gast 

1971. Potassium-argon ages, volcanic stratigraphy, and paleomagnetic polarity history 
of the Canary Islands: Lanzarotte, Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, and La Gomera. 
American Journal of Science, vol. 271, pp. 490-521, 7 figs., 3 tables. 

AzpertiA, D. F. M. 

1911. La Diatomologia Espafiola en los Comienzos del Siglo XX. Asociacion espanola 

para el progreso de las ciencias, Zaragoza, vol. 4, pt. 2, 320 pp. 12 pls., Madrid. 
Banpy, O. L., AND J. C. INGLE, JR. 

1970. Neogene planktonic events and radiometric scale, California. Geological Society 

of America, Special Papers, no. 124, pp. 131-172, 7 figs. 
BAUMANN, P., AND P. H. RotH 

1969. Zonierung des Obereozins und Oligozans des Monte Cagnero (Zentralappenin) 
mit planktonischen Foraminiferen und Nannoplankton. Eclogae geologicae 
Helvetiae, vol. 62, pp. 303-323, 2 figs. 

BERGGREN, W. A. 

1969. Cenozoic chronostratigraphy, planktonic foraminiferal zonation and radiometric 
time scale. Nature, vol. 224, pp. 1072-1075. 

1972. A Cenozoic time scale—some implications for regional geology and paleobiogeog- 
raphy. Lethaia, vol. 5, pp. 195-215, 10 figs. 

Bow, W. H. 

1969. Late Middle Eocene to Recent planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy. Pro- 
ceedings of the International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils, vol. 1, 
pp. 199-422, 43 tables, 54 pls., Leiden. 

Bott, H. 

1957. Planktonic foraminifera from the Oligocene-Miocene Cipero and Lengua Forma- 
tions of Trinidad, B.W.I. In A. R. Loeblich, Jr. et al.: Studies in Foraminifera. 
Bulletin of the United States National Museum, no. 215, pp. 97-123. 

BrAMLETTE, M. N., AND J. A. Witcoxon 

1967. Middle Tertiary calcareous nannoplankton of the Cipero section, Trinidad, W.I. 

Tulane Studies in Geology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 93-132, 10 pls., Tulane. 
Burckte, L. H. 

1972. Late Cenozoic planktonic diatom zones from the Eastern-Equatorial Pacific. Nova 

Hedwigia, vol. 39, pp. 217-246, 4 figs., 3 pls. 


560 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


CASTRACANE, C. A. F. 
1886. Reports on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the 
years 1873-1876. Botany, vol. 2, 178 pp., 30 pls., Her Majesty’s Stationery 
Office, London. 
Cox, A. 
1969. Geomagnetic reversals. Science, vol. 163, no. 3864, pp. 237-245, 8 figs., 2 tables. 
DoNnaAHUE, J. G. 
1970. Pleistocene diatoms as climatic indicators in North Pacific sediments. Geological 
Society of America, Memoir, no. 126, pp. 121-138, 6 figs., 3 pls. 
Dymonp, J. R. 
1966. Potassium-Argon geochronology of deep sea sediments. Science, vol. 152, 
pp. 1239-1241, 1 table, 2 figs. 
FRENGUELLI, J. 
1949. Diatomeas fosiles de los yacimientos chilenos de Tiltil y Mejillones. Darwinia, 
vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97-157, 2 figs., 10 pls. 
GREVILLE, R. K. 
1863. Description of new and rare diatoms. Transactions of the Microscopical Society 
of London, n:s., vol. 3, no. 11, ser. X, pp. 227-237, 2 pls. 
Grunow, A. 
1883. Jn H. Van Heurck: Synopsis des Diatomées de Belgique. Pp. 104-132 (Ducaju 
& Cie.), Anvers. 
1884. Die Diatomeen von Franz-Josephs Land. Denkschriften mathematische-natur- 
wissenschaftliche Klasse Kaiserlich Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. 48, pp. 
53-112, 5 pls. 
Hanna, G D. 
1930. A review of the genus Rowuxia. Journal of Paleontology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 
179-188, 1 pl. 
1932. VI. The diatoms of Sharktooth Hill, Kern County, California. Proceedings of 
the California Academy of Sciences, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 161-263, 16 pls. 
Hanna, G D., anp A. L. BrIGGER 
1970. Observations on Liostephania. Nova Hedwigia, vol. 31, pp. 89-100, 6 pls., Fried- 
rich-Hustedt-Gedenkband. 
Hanna, G D., anp W. M. GrAntT 
1926. Expedition to the Revillagigedo Islands, Mexico in 1925, II, Miocene diatoms 
from Maria Madre Island, Mexico. Proceedings of the California Academy of 
Sciences, 4th Ser., vol. 15, pp. 115-193, 1 fig., 11 pls. 
Hajos, M. 
1968. Die Diatomeen der miozanen Ablagerungen des Matravorlandes. Geologica 
Hungarica, Series Paleontologica, vol. 37, pp. 33-401, 7 tables, 27 figs., 68 pls. 
HAste, R. G., And B. R. E. DE Menpi01La 
1967. The fine structure of some Thalassionema and Thalassothrix species. Phycologia, 
vol. 6, nos. 2 and 3, pp. 107-125, 53 figs. 
Henpey, N. J., AND D. H. WISEMAN 
1953. The significance and diatom content of a deep sea floor sample from the neigh- 
bourhood of the greatest oceanic depth. Deep Sea Research, vol. 1, pp. 47-59, 
1 table, 2 figs., 2 pls. 
Hustept, FR. 
1930-1959. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Osterreichs und der Schweiz unter Beriick- 
sichtigung der iibrigen Lander Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. 


VoL. XXXIX] SCHRADER: DIATOM STRATIGRAPHY 561 


In L. Rabenhorst: Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Osterreich und der 
Schweiz, Bd. VII, Teil 1, 920 pp., 542 figs.; Teil 2, 845 pp., 1179 figs. 
JANiscH, C. 

1888 (?). The diatoms of the “Gazelle” Expedition. 17 (22?) plates with manuscript 

index. Not published but distributed to diatomologists by the author. 
Kanava, T. 

1959. Miocene diatom assemblages from the Onnagawa Formation and their distribution 
in the correlative formations in Northeast Japan. Science Reports of Tohoku 
University, 2nd Series (Geology), vol. 30, 130 pp., 9 figs., 11 pls. 

1971. Some aspects of Pre-Quaternary diatoms in the ocean. Jn W. R. Riedel and 
B. M. Funnel, eds.: The Micropaleontology of Oceans, pp. 545-565, 5 figs., 6 pls. 

Koizumi, J. 

1968. Tertiary diatom flora of Oga Peninsula, Akita Prefecture, Northeast Japan. 
Science Reports of Tohoku University, 2nd Series (Geology), vol. 40, pp. 171- 
225, 15 figs., 2 tables, 4 pls. 

1972. Marine diatom flora of the Pliocene Tatsunokuchi Formation in Fukishima Pre- 
fecture. Transactions and Proceedings of the Paleontological Society of Japan, 
N.S. m, vol. 86, pp. 340-359, 4 figs., 2 pls. 

Kose, R. W. 

1954. Diatoms from Equatorial Pacific Cores. Report of the Swedish Deep Sea Expe- 
dition, VI, Petterson ed., Sediment cores from the West Pacific, fasc. 1, pp. 3-49, 
9 figs., 4 pls. 

KRrvueEceEr, H. W. 

1964. K-Ar age of basalt cored in the Mohole Project (Guadalupe Site). Journal of 

Geophysical Research, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1155-1156. 
LoHMANYN, K. E. 

1938. Pliocene diatoms from the Kettleman Hills, California. Professional Paper of 
the Geological Survey of America, no. 189-C, pp. 81-102, 4 pls. 

1948. Middle Miocene Diatoms from the Hammond Well. In Cretaceous and Tertiary 
subsurface geology. Maryland Department of Geology, Mineralogy and Water 
Resources, Bull. 2, pp. 151-186, 7 pls. 

MarrtInI, E. 

1971. Standard Tertiary and Quaternary calcareous nannoplankton zonation. Proceed- 
ings of the Second Planktonic Conference, Roma 1970, vol. II, pp. 739-785, 6 
tables, 4 pls. 

1972. Der stratigraphische Wert von Silicoflagellaten im Jungtertiar von Kalifornien 
und des 6stlichen Pazifischen Ozeans. Nachrichten Deutsche Geologische Gesell- 
schaft, vol. 5, pp. 47-49, 2 figs. 

Martini, E., anp M. S. BRAMLETTE 

1963. Calcareous nannoplankton from the Experimental Mohole Drilling. Journal of 

Paleontology, vol. 37, pp. 845-856, 2 figs., 4 pls. 
Martini, E., AnD T. WoRSLEY 

1970. Standard Neogene calcareous nannoplankton zonation. Nature, vol. 225, no. 5229, 

pp. 289-290, 1 table. 
Mertz, D. 

1966. Mikropalaontologische und sedimentologische Untersuchungen der Pisco-Forma- 
tion Siidperus. Palaeontographica, B, vol. 118, 51 pp., 7 pls., 2 charts, 1 fig., 
7 tables. 


562 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES [Proc. 4TH SER. 


Moore, T. 
1971. Radiolaria. Jn Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, J. I. Tracey and 
G. H. Sutton, editors, VIII, pp. 727-775, 3 figs., 13 pls. 
PANTOCSEK, J. 
1886. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der fossilen Bacillarien Ungarns. Teil 1, Marine Bacil- 
larien, 75 pp., 30 pls., Nagy-Tapolcsany. 
PARKER, F. L. 
1964. Foraminifera from the Experimental Mohole Drilling near Guadalupe Island, 
Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, vol. 38, pp. 617-636, 3 tables, 6 pls. 
RATTRAY, J. 
1890. A revision of the genus Coscinodiscus EHR., and some allied genera. Proceedings 
of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, vol. 16, pp. 449-692, 3 pls. 
REINHOLD, TH. 
1937. Fossil diatoms of the Neogene of Java and their zonal distribution. Verh. Geo- 
logisch-Mijnbouwkundig Genootschap voor Nederland en Kolonién, Geological 
Series, XII, vols. 1-132, pp. 43-133, 21 pls. 
RiepEL, W. R., H. S. Lapp, J. I. TRAcEy, AnD M. N. BRAMLETTE 
1961. Preliminary Drilling phase of Mohole Project I]. Summary of coring operations 
(Guadalupe Site). Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geol- 
ogists, vol. 45, pp. 1793-1798, 1 fig., 1 table. 
RIEDEL, W. R., AND A. SANFILIPPO 
1971. 32. Cenozoic Radiolaria from the Western Tropical Pacific, leg 7. Initial reports 
of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, vol. 7, E. L. Winterer and W. R. Riedel, 
editors, pp. 1529-1672, 8 tables, 3 figs., 31 pls., Washington. 
SCHRADER, H.-J. 
1973a. Cenozoic diatoms from the northeast Pacific, leg 18. Jn Kulm, L. D.; von Huene, 
R., et al., 1973. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, vol. 18, 
Washington, pp. 673-797. 
1973b. Stratigraphic distribution of marine Denticula species in Neogene North 
Pacific sediments. Micropaleontology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 417-430. 
MS. Proposal for a standardized method of cleaning diatom bearing deep-sea and 
land-exposed marine sediments. Manuscript submitted to Nova Hedwigia. 
SHESHUKOVA-PORETZKAYA, V. S. 
1967. [Neogene marine diatoms of Sachalin and Kamtschatka], Izdania Leningradskii 
Universitet, 327 pp., Leningrad (in Russian with English summary). 
SrmMonsen, R., AND T. KANAYA 
1961. Notes on the marine species of the diatom genus Denticula Kitz. Internationale 
Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie, vol. 46, pp. 498-513, 1 table, 4 figs. 
Wornarpt, W. W. 
1967. Miocene and Pliocene marine diatoms from California. Occasional Papers of 
the California Academy of Sciences, vol. 63, 108 pp., 217 figs. 


INDEX TO VOLUME XXXIX 


FOURTH SERIES 


New names and principal references in boldface type. 


italics. 


Abe, Tokiharu, and William N. Eschmeyer, 
A new species of the scorpionfish genus 
Helicolenus from the north Pacific 
Ocean, 47-53. 

Abe, Tokiharu, see Eschmeyer, William N. 

Acanthina grandis, 28 

Acanthochitona 

armata, 501 
viridis, 501 
Actaea 
nana, 319 
parvula, 315, 318, 329, 330 
remota, 318 
Acteocina infrequens, 28 
Actinocyclus, 532 
cubitus, 524, 531, 532 
ehrenbergii, 524, 532 
ellipticus, 524, 533 
ellipticus moronensis 524, 532, 533 
ingens, 526, 534 
okhotensis, 524, 534 

Agastache, 146, 147, 177 

Agriopus, 307 

Alaba supralirata, 28 

Allips, 116, 117 

concolor, 111, 116, 117, 117, 118 
Allomycter, 389, 390, 393, 403, 405, 406 
dissutus, 393 

Alvania, 28 
galapagensis, 28 
halia, 28 
hoodensis, 28 
nemo, 28 

Ambrosia, 146, 179 
artemisiifolia, 145, 146 

Amphineura:Chitonidae), A new Hawaiian 
chiton, Rhyssoplax linsleyi (Mollusca:, 
by Glenn E. Burghardt, 501-506. 

Amphithalmus trosti, 28 

Anachis, 28 

tabogaensis, 28 
Anatina (Raeta) undulata, 27 


References to illustrations in 


anatomy of the forelimb of the sea otter 
(Enhydra lutris), Muscular, by L. D. 
Howard, 411-500 
Anodontia, 33 
edentuloides, 33 
(Lissosphaira), 33 
(Lissosphaira) spherica, 33 
philippiana, 33 
spherica, 27, 30, 32, 33, 34 
Anodota sphericula, 33 
Anomia peruviana, 27 
Anthochiton, 505 
Apistus, 339 
Aploactis, 373 
breviceps, 373 
(Apodes:Ophichthidae), Two new _ genera 
and two new species of western Pacific 
snake-eels, by John E. McCosker, 
111-120. 
Apogon evermanni, 130 
Aprionodon, 391, 405 
Arca 
(Arcopsis) solida, 28 
pacifica, 28 
Archoplites interruptus, 77, 79, 80, 82, 83 
Artemisia, 146 
tridentata, 146, 173 
Ashlock, Peter D., The Lygaeidae of the 
Galapagos Islands (Hemiptera: Het- 
eroptera), 87-103. 
Aster, 146, 170 
tanacetifolius, 146 
Asterolampra, 534, 546 
grevillei, 534 
marylandica, 524, 534 
Asteromphalus, 546 
Atergatis elegans, 319 
Atlantic, Nezumia (Kuronezumia) bubonis a 
new subgenus and species of grenadier 
(Macrouridae: Pisces) from Hawaii 
and the western North, by Tomio 
Iwamoto, 507-516. 


[563] 


564 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


Atrina, 28 
tuberculosa, 28 


Baileya, 146 
multiradiata, 146, 167 
Balanus, 72 
allium, 72 
amphitrite, 67, 69 
amphitrite amphitrite, 65, 66, 66, 67, 69 
amphitrite hawaiiensis, 67 
(Armatobalanus), 72 
balanoides, 69 
balanus, 69 
crenatus, 69 
eburneus, 67, 69, 70 
improvisus, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 
Balcis, 28 


berryi, 28 
Baltra (South Seymour) Island, Galapagos 
Islands, Pliocene fossils from, by 
Leo G. Hertlein, 25-46. 
Barbatia reeveana, 28 
barnacle records (Cirripedia, Thoracica), 


New, by Victor A. Zullo, Dea B. 
Beach, and James T. Carlton, 65-74. 

Bascanichthys, 116, 117 

Beach, Dea B., see Zullo, Victor A. 

Beryx spendens, 47 

Biddulphia, 534 

moholensis, 518, 534, 544 

Bombonia, 135 

brachyuran crabs of Easter Island, The, 
by John S. Garth, 311-336. 

Brigger, A. L., see Mandra, York T. 

Walter C., and Marjorie V. C. 
Falanruw, A new lizard of the genus 
Emoia (Scincidae) from the Marianas 
Islands, 105-110. 

Bruniopsis, 534 

mirabilis, 524, 531, 532, 534 

Bufichthys, 341, 342, 343, 363, 364 

erosa, 342, 343 

grossa, 342 

horrida, 342 
Bulimulus calvus, 22 


Brown, 


Bulla punctulata, 28 

Burghardt, Glenn E., A new Hawaiian 
chiton, Rhyssoplax linsleyi (Mollusca: 
Amphineura: Chitonidae), 501-506. 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


California freshwater fishes, A key, based on 
scales to the families of native, by 
Richard W. Casteel, 75-86. 

Calliscyllium, 257 

Campogramma, 244, 246, 247 

glaycos, 246, 246 
liro, 246 
vadigo, 246 

Campogramma (Pisces: Carangidae), Com- 
parative revision of Scomberoides, 
Oligoplites, Parona, and Hypacanthus 
with comments on the phylogenetic 
position of, by William F. Smith-Vaniz 
and Jon C. Staiger, 185-256. 

Cancellaria, 28 

ovata, 28 

Cancer 

convexus, 317 
cymodoce, 321 
dodone, 319 
electra, 320 
variegatus, 323 
Cantharus, 28 
janellii, 28 
scissus, 28 

Carangidae), Comparative revision of Scom- 
beroides, Oligoplites, Parona, and 
Hypacanthus with comments on the 
phylogenetic position of Campo- 
gramma (Pisces:, by William F. Smith- 
Vaniz and Jon C. Staiger, 185-256. 

Caranx, 191 

(Gnathanodon) speciosus, 240 

Carcharhinidae), Ctenacis and Gollum, two 
new genera of sharks, (Selachii:, by 
L. J. V. Compagno, 257-272. 

(Carcharhiniformes: Triakidae), with a re- 
definition of the family Triakidae and 
a key to Triakid genera, Gogolia file- 
woodi, a@ new genus and species of 
shark from New Guinea, by L. J. V. 
Compagno, 383-410. 

Carcharhinus, 389, 391, 405 

Cardium elenense, 28 

Carlton, James T., see Zullo, Victor A. 

Carpilius, 312 

convexus, 315, 317, 329, 330 

Carpilodes, 313 

monticulosus, 318 
rugatus, 318 


VoL. XXXIX] 


Casteel, Richard W., A key, based on scales, 
to the families of native California 
freshwater fishes, 75-86. 

Casuarina, 110 

Catostomus 

latipinnis, 76 
luxatus, 76 
mniotiltus, 76 
occidentalis humboldtianus, 76 
occidentalis occidentalis, 76, 81 
platyrhynchus, 76 
rimiculus, 76 
santaanae, 76 
tahoensis, 76 
Cavilucina densata, 33 
Centronotus 
argenteus, 221 
glaycos, 244, 248 
vadigo, 228, 229, 230 

Cerambycidae), The genus Mecas LeConte 
(Coleoptera:, by John A. Chemsak and 
E. G. Linsley, 141-184. 

Cerithiopsis, 28 

curtata, 28 
galapagensis, 28 

Cerithium adustum, 28 

Chaenogaleus, 392, 405 

Chama, 28 

Champson sechellensis, 303 

Cheila equestris, 28 

Chelonibia patula, 69 

Chemical extraction techniques to free fossil 
silicoflagellates from marine  sedi- 
mentary rocks, by York T. Mandra, 
A. L. Brigger, and Highoohi Mandra, 
273-284. 

Chemsak, John A., and E. G. Linsley, The 
genus Mecas LeConte (Coleoptera: 
Cerambycidae), 141-184. 

Cheroscorpaena, 339 

Chione, 28 

pertincta, 37 
seymourensis, 37, 38 
undatella, 28 
Chiton affinis, 505 
chiton, Rhyssoplax linsleyi (Mollusca: Am- 


phineura: Chitonidae), A new 
Hawaiian, by Glenn E. Burghardt, 
501-506. 


Chitonidae), A new Hawaiian chiton, Rhys- 


INDEX 


565 
soplax linsleyi (Mollusca: Amphi- 
neura:, by Glenn E. Burghardt, 501- 
506. 

Chlamys, 1, 2 
amandi, 4 


(Argopecten) circularis, 1, 28 
benedicti, 4 
(Chlamys) ineantata, 2, 3 
(Chlamys) lowei, 1 
hastata, 4 
incantata, 2, 4 
magnifica, 31 
(Nodipecten) magnifica, 1, 28, 31, 32, 
34, 36 
(Nodipecten) nodosa, 31 
Chlamys (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) from the 
Galapagos Islands, Description of a 
new species of, by Leo G. Hertlein, 
1-6. 
Chlorodiella, 312, 314, 320 
barbata, 320 
cytherea, 315, 320, 329 
laevissima, 320 
nigra, 320 
Chlorodius cytherea, 320, 330 
Choridactyloides, 339 
Choridactylus, 308, 339 
Chorinemus, 190, 191, 192, 229, 242, 248 
altus, 223, 248 
commersonianus, 200 
delicatulus, 194, 248 
exoletus, 194, 248 
farkharrii, 248 
guaribira, 225, 248 
hainanensis, 199, 201, 248 
lanceolatus, 221, 222, 249 
leucopthalmus, 194, 249 
maculosus, 249 
mauritianus, 205, 207, 249 
moadetta, 205, 206, 207, 249 
occidentalis, 221, 242, 249 
orientalis, 190, 205, 207, 249 
palometa, 225, 249 
saltans, 221, 249 
sanctipetri, 205, 207, 208, 249 
tala, 190, 199, 205, 250 
tol, 190, 209, 210, 250 
toloo, 199, 201, 250 
Chorismopelor, 339 
Chthamalus stellatus thompsoni, 67 


566 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


(Cirripedia, Thoracica), New barnacle rec- 
ords, by Victor A. Zullo, Dea B. 
Beach, and James T. Carlton, 65-74. 

Cladogramma, 534 

dubium, 524, 534 

(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), The genus 
Mecas, by John A. Chemsak and E.G. 
Linsley, 141-184. 

Colubrina texensis, 163 

Compagno, L. J. V., Ctenacis and Gollum, 
two new genera of sharks (Selachii: 
Carcharhinidae), 257-272. 

Compagno, L. J. V., Gogolia filewoodi, a new 
genus and species of shark from 
New Guinea (Carcharhiniformes: 
Triakidae), with a redefinition of the 
family Triakidae and a key to 
Triakid genera, 383-410. 

Comparative revision of Scomberoides, Oli- 
goplites, Parona, and MHypacanthus 
with comments on the phylogenetic 
position of Campogramma (Pisces: 
Carangidae), by William F. Smith- 
Vaniz and Jon C. Staiger, 185-256. 

Conus, 28 

fergusoni, 28 
lucidus, 28 

Corbicula manilensis, 68 

Corbisema triacantha, 531, 558 

Cordia, 93 

Corythobatus, 339 

Corythoichthys, 127, 135 

flavofasciatus, 131 

flavofasciatus conspicillatus, 131 

flavofasciatus flavofasciatus, 131 
Coscinodiscus, 535, 541 

antiquus, 524, 531, 535 

endoi, 524, 535, 540 

flexuosus, 539, 541 

lancettula, 518, 536, 542 

lewisianus, 524, 532, 535 

marginatus, 524, 535 

marginatus fossilis, 535 

moholensis, 518, 535, 540 

nodulifer, 524 

paleaceus, 541, 543 

plicatus, 535, 544 

praepaleaceus, 541, 543 

reniformis, 541 

species 1 Schrader, 537, 544 


[Proc. 47TH Serr. 


species 2 Schrader, 538, 539 
species 3 Schrader, 538, 539 
stellaris symbolophora, 537 
symbolophorus, 524, 536, 537 
temperei, 524, 529, 537, 538 
vetustissimus, 524, 537, 540 
vetustissimus javanicus, 524, 531, 537 
yabei, 524, 525, 526, 531, 532, 537, 538, 
539, 540, 544 
crabs of Easter Island, The brachyuran, by 
John S. Garth, 311-336. 
Craspedodiscus, 54:1 
coscinodiscus, 526, 531, 541 
Crassostrea virginica, 65 
Creusia, 71, 72 
domingensis, 71, 71, 72 
Ctena galapagana, 28 
Ctenacis, 257, 258, 263, 264, 268, 269, 390, 
405 
felmanni, 257, 258, 260, 263, 264, 270 
Ctenacis and Gollum, two new genera of 
sharks (Selachii: Carcharhinidae), by 
L. J. V. Compagno, 257-272. 
Cuminga, 28 
lamellosa, 28 
Cussia, 517, 541 
mediopunctata, 518, 542 
mediopunctata matraensis, 518, 542 
moholensis, 518, 536, 542 
paleacea, 518, 524, 531, 532, 536, 543 
praepaleacea, 518, 524, 531, 532, 536, 
542, 543 
species 1 Schrader, 536, 543 
tatsunokuchiensis, 518, 536, 543 
Cyclograpsus, 312, 325 
longipes, 315, 325, 329, 330 
Cyclopecten 
(Cyclopecten) exquisitus, 1 
(Cyclopecten) liriope, 1 
(Cyclopecten) pernomus, 1 
(Delectopecten) polyleptus, 1 
(Delectopecten) zacae, 1 
(Hyalopecten) neoceanicus, 1 
Cylichna, 29 
defuncta, 29 
Cymatium lineatum, 29 
Cymoninus, 89, 97 
notabilis, 94, 97, 99 
Cymus galapagensis, 95 
Cyperus confertus, 97 


Vor. XXXIX] 


Cypraea nigropunctata, 29 

Cyprinodon 
macularius californiensis, 77, 80, 82 
nevadensis calidae, 77 
nevadensis nevadensis, 77 
nevadensis shoshone, 77 
salinus, 77 

Cytharella camarina, 29 


Dampierosa, 337, 339, 340, 365, 367, 369 
daruma, 341, 351, 356, 367, 368, 369 
Darwiniothamnus, 20 
Darwinysius, 88, 89, 93, 94, 96 
marginalis, 91, 95 
wenmanensis, 92, 94, 94, 95, 96 
Decterias, 339 
Deleastes, 342, 343 
daector, 342 
Denticula, 543 
dimorpha, 524, 529, 531, 536, 543 
hustedtii, 524, 529, 531, 532, 536, 543 
hyalina, 536, 545 
hyalina hustedtii, 524, 529, 545 
lauta, 524, 529, 531, 532, 536, 545 
nicobarica, 524, 531, 532, 536, 545 
punctata, 545 
punctata hustedtii, 524, 531, 536, 545 
Dentirostrum, 123, 124, 126, 127 
jamssi, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127 
Description of a new species of Chlamys 


(Mollusca: Pelecypoda) from _ the 
Galapagos Islands, by Leo G. 
Hertlein, 1-6. 

diatom stratigraphy of the experimental 


Mohole Drilling, Guadalupe Site, Re- 
vised, by Hans-Joachim Schrader, 
517-562. 
Dictyocha 
octacantha, 517, 532, 558 
pseudofibula, 558 
Diodora alta, 29 
Diplodonta 
subquadrata, 35 
subquadrata baltrana, 26, 28, 33, 34 
Dirrhizodon, 392, 405 
Doryrhamphus, 122, 123 
melanopleura, 130 
Dromia unidentata, 316 
Dromida, 312, 314 
unidentata, 315, 316, 329, 331 


INDEX 567 


unidentata hawaiiensis, 316 
unidentata unidentata, 316 
Dunckerocampus, 122, 123, 129 
baldwini, 122, 123, 128, 128, 130 
ben-tuviae, 122, 123 
caulleryi, 123 
caulleryi caulleryi, 122, 123 
caulleryi chapmani, 122, 123 
dactyliophorus, 122, 123, 130, 131, 132 
multiannulatus, 122, 123 
pessuliferus, 122, 123 
Dylobolus, 141, 153 
rotundicollis, 153, 157 


Easter Island, The brachyuran crabs of, by 
John S. Garth, 311-366. 
Eleria, 190, 192 
philippina, 190, 199, 201, 205, 249 
Elytroleptus, 143, 144, 153 
Emissola, 390 
Emmydrichthys, 341, 343 
vulcanus, 341, 359, 362 
Emoia, 105, 107, 110 
arnoensis, 105, 108, 109 
atrocostata, 105, 108, 109, 110 
boettgeri, 105, 109 
boettgeri boettgeri, 108, 109 
boettgeri orientalis, 108 
caeruleocauda, 110 
cyanura, 110 
flavigularis, 105, 108, 109 
nigra, 105, 108 
slevini, 706, 107, 108, 109, 110 
Emoia (Scincidae) from the Marianas Islands, 
A new lizard of the genus, by Walter C. 
Brown and Marjorie V. C. Falanruw, 
105-110. 
Encope 
micropora, 27 
micropora galapagana, 27 
Engina pyrostoma, 29 
Enhydra lutris, 411 
Entelurus aequoreus, 130 
Erato (Hespererato) marginata galapagensis, 


29 
Eridacnis, 257, 258, 263, 268, 269, 390, 
391, 405 


barbouri, 257 
radcliffei, 257 
sinuans, 257 


568 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


Erosa, 307, 337, 339, 340, 342, 343, 363, 365, 
367, 369 
daruma, 367 
erosa, 341, 342, 351, 356, 364, 366, 367 
fratrum, 364, 365 
iridea, 364, 365 
Eschmeyer, William N., Voshitsugu Hirosaki, 
and Tokiharu Abe, Two new species 
of the scorpionfish genus Rhinopias, 
with comments on related genera and 
species, 285-310. 
Eschmeyer, William N., and K. V. Rama Rao, 
Two new scorpionfishes (genus Scor- 
paenodes) from the Indo-west Pacific, 
with comments on  Scorpaenodes 
muciparus (Alcock), 55-64. 
Eschmeyer, William N., and Kaza V. Rama 
Rao, Two new stonefishes (Pisces: 
Scorpaenidae) from the Indo-west 
Pacific, with a synopsis of the sub- 
family Synanceiinae, 337-382. 
Eschmeyer, William N., see Abe, Tokiharu 
Ethmodiscus, 545 
rex, 525, 54.5 

Etisodes 
electra, 320, 330 
sculptilis, 320 

Etisus, 313 
electra, 315, 320, 329 
(Etisodes) electra, 320 
rugosus, 320 

Eucidaris thouarsii, 27 

Eugaleus, 390 

Eulimostraca, 29 

galapagensis, 29 
Euphorbia viminea, 95 
Evips, 113 
percinetus, 111, 112, 113, 174, 114, 115 
extraction techniques to free fossil silico- 
flagellates from marine sedimentary 
rocks, Chemical, by York T. Mandra, 
A. L. Brigger, and Highoohi Mandra, 
273-284. 
Eysenhardtia polystachya, 157, 159 


Falanruw, Marjorie V. C., see 
Walter C. 
Fasciolaria, 67 


Brown, 


Fissurella, 29 


[Proc. 47TH Serr. 


macrotrema, 29 
virescens, 29 
Five new Indo-Pacific pipefishes, by Earl S. 
Herald and John E. Randall, 121-140. 
Flaveria linearis, 179 
Florimetis cognata, 28 
forelimb of the sea-otter (Enhydra lutris), 
Muscular anatomy of the, by L. D. 
Howard, 411-500. 
Fundulus, 81 
parvipinnis, 77 
Furgaleus, 389, 391, 392, 393, 405 
Fusinus dupetitthouarsii, 29 


Gaillardia, 146, 179 
pinnatifida, 146 
pulchella, 146 

Galapagos Islands, Description of a new 
species of Chlamys (Mollusca: Pelec- 
ypoda) from the, by Leo G. Hertlein, 
1-6. 

Galapagos Islands (Hemiptera: Heteroptera), 
The Lygaeidae of the, by Peter D. 
Ashlock, 87-103. 

Galapagos Islands, Pliocene fossils from 
Baltra (South Seymour) Island, by 
Leo G. Hertlein, 25-46. 

Galapagos, Three new land snails from Isla 
Santa Cruz (Indefatigable Island), by 
Allyn G. Smith, 7-24. 

Galeocerdo, 391, 392, 405 

Galeorhinus, 389, 390, 392, 393, 394, 398, 403, 
405 

Galeus, 390 

recticonus, 394 

Garth, John S., The brachyuran crabs of 
Easter Island, 311-336. 

Gastrocopta munita, 29, 31 

genus Mecas LeConte (Coleoptera: Ceram- 
bycidae), The, by John A. Chemsak 
and E. G. Linsley, 141-184. 

Geograpsus crinipes, 312, 315, 323, 329 

Gila 

bicolor bicolor, 76 
bicolor obesa, 76 
bicolor pectinifer, 76 
crassicauda, 76 
elegans, 77 
mohavensis, 76 
orcutti, 76 


VoL. XXXIX] 


Globorotalia 
mayeri, 558 
menardil, 558 
Glycymeris maculata, 28 
Gogolia, 383, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 
398, 405, 406 
filewoodi, 383, 384, 386, 388, 394, 395, 
396, 399, 400, 402, 403, 405 
Gogolia filewoodi, a new genus and species 
of shark from New Guinea (Carcha- 
rhiniformes: Triakidae), with a 
redefinition of the family Triakidae 
and a key to Triakid genera, by 
L. J. V. Compagno, 383-410. 


Gollum, 257, 262, 264, 268, 269, 270, 
390, 405 
attenuatus, 257, 258, 261, 263, 264, 
265, 270 
Gollum, two new genera of sharks (Selachii; 
Carcharhinidae), Ctenacis and, by 
L. J. V. Compagno, 257-272. 
Gordiichthys, 116 
Granula, 29 
minor, 29 
polita, 29 
Granulina margaritula, 29 
Grapsilius maculatus, 321 
Grapsillus cymodoce, 321 
Grapsus 
crinipes, 323 
grapsus, 324 
transversus, 324 
grenadier (Macrouridae: Pisces) from 
Hawait and the western North 
Atlantic, Nezumia  (Kuronezumia) 


bubonis, a new subgenus and species of, 
by Tomio Iwamoto, 507-516. 
Guadalupe Site, Revised diatom stratigraphy 
of the Experimental Mohole Drilling, 
by Hans-Joachim Schrader, 517-562. 
Guardiola, 146 
tulocarpus, 146, 157 
Gymnothorax, 130 


North Atlantic, 
Nezumia (Kuronezumia) bubonis, a 
new subgenus and species of grenadier 
(Macrouridae: Pisces) from, by Tomio 
Iwamoto, 507-516. 


Hawaii and the western 


INDEX 569 


Hawaiian chiton, Rhyssoplax linsleyi (Mol- 
lusca: Amphineura: Chitonidae), A 
new, by Glenn E. Burghardt, 501-506. 
Helenium, 146 
hoopesii, 146 
microcephalum, 146, 167 
tenuifolium, 146 
Helianthus, 145, 146, 170, 179 
annus, 146 
tuberosus, 145, 146 
Helicolenus, 47, 48, 51, 53 
avius, 47, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 
barathri, 53 
dactylopterus, 48, 51, 53 
dactylopterus lahillei, 51 
hilgendorfi, 51, 53 
imperialis, 51 
lengerichi, 53 
maccullochi, 53 
maculatus, 51 
maderensis, 51 
microphthalmus, 53 
mouchezi, 51 
papillosus, 53 
percoides, 53 
rufescens, 53 
thelmae, 51 
tristianensis, 51 
uruguayensis, 51 
Helicolenus from the north Pacific Ocean, 
A new species of the scorpionfish genus, 
by Tokiharu Abe and William N. 
Eschmevyer, 47-53. 
Hemiaulus, 545 
polymorphus, 525, 545 
Hemidiscus, 545 
cuneiformis, 525, 545 
simplicissimus, 525, 545 
Hemigaleus, 392, 405 
pingi, 392 
Hemipristis, 392, 405 
(Hemiptera: Heteroptera), The Lygaeidae of 
the Galapagos Islands, by Peter D. 
Ashlock, 87-103. 
Hemitriakis, 257, 263, 389, 392, 393, 394, 398 
403, 405 
Heraeus, 89, 101 
pacificus, 700, 101 
Herald, Earl S., and John E. Randall, Five 
new Indo-Pacific pipefishes, 121-140. 


570 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


Hertlein, Leo G., Description of a new species 
of Chlamys (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) 
from the Galapagos Islands, 1-6. 

Hertlein, Leo G., Pliocene fossils from Baltra 
(South Seymour) Island, Galapagos 
Islands, 25-46. 

Hesperoleucas 

navarroensis, 76 

parvipinnis, 76 

symmetricus subditus, 76 
symmetricus symmetricus, 76 
symmetricus venustus, 76 

Heterogaleus, 392 

Heteroptera), The Lygaeidae of the Gala- 
pagos Islands, (Hemiptera:, by Peter 
D. Ashlock, 87-103. 

Hexacreusia, 72 

durhami, 71, 72, 73 
Hipponix pilosus, 29 
Hipposcorpaena, 285, 303, 304, 306 
filamentosa, 304, 305 

Hirosaki, Yoshitsugu, see Eschmeyer, William 
N. 

Howard, L. D., Muscular anatomy of the 
forelimb of the sea otter (Enhydra 
lutris), 411-500. 

Hozukius, 48, 51 

Hymeniacidon, 316 

Hypacanthus, 228, 229, 230, 231, 241, 243, 
244, 245, 247 

amia, 229, 230, 231, 232, 238, 239, 241, 
247 

Hypacanthus, with comments on the phylo- 
genetic position of Campogramma 
(Pisces: Carangidae), Comparative 
revision of Scomberoides, Oligoplites, 
Parona, and, by William F. Smith- 
Vaniz and Jon C. Staiger, 185-256. 

Hypericum pratense, 93 

Hypogaleus, 389, 392, 393, 394, 403, 405 

Hypoprion, 391, 405 

Hysterocarpus traskii, 77, 82, 83 


Iago, 389, 392, 393, 398, 405 

Ichthyocampus annulatus, 139 

(Indefatigable Island), Galapagos, Three new 
land snails from Isla Santa Cruz, by 
Allyn G. Smith, 7-24. 

Indo-Pacific pipefishes, Five new, by Earl S. 
Herald and John E. Randall, 121-140. 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


Indo-west Pacific, with a synopsis of the 
subfamily Synanceiinae, Two new 
stonefishes (Pisces: Scorpaenidae) from 
the, by William N. Eschmeyer and 
Kaza V. Rama Rao, 337-382. 


Indo-west Pacific, with comments on 
Scorpaenodes muciparus (Alcock), 
Two new _ scorpionfishes (genus 


Scorpaenodes) from the, by William N. 
Eschmeyer and K. V. Rama Rao, 
55-64. 
Inimicus, 307, 308, 339 
didactylum, 288 
Ischnochiton petaloides, 501 


Iselica, 29 
kochi, 29 
Isla Santa Cruz (Indefatigable Island), 
Galapagos, Three new land snails 


from, by Allyn G. Smith, 7-24. 
Isogomphodon, 391, 405 
Iwamoto, Tomio, Nezumia (Kuronezumia) 
bubonis, a@ new subgenus and species 
of grenadier (Macrouridae: Pisces) 
from Hawai and the western North 
Atlantic, 507-516. 


Jaegeria hirta, 101 


key, based on scales, to the families of native 
California freshwater fishes, A, by 
Richard W. Casteel, 75-86. 

(Kuronezumia) bubonis, a new subgenus and 
species of grenadier (Macrouridae: 
Pisces) from Hawaii and the western 
North Atlantic, Nezumia, by Tomio 
Iwamoto, 507-516. 


Lamiopsis, 392, 405 

Lavinia 
exilicauda exilicauda, 76 
exilicauda harengus, 76 

Leiaster leachii, 321, 322 

Leptocharias, 390, 404, 405 

Leptograpsus, 
ansoni, 323 
variegatus, 

330, 331 

Leptosynanceia, 337, 339, 340, 370, 375, 377 
asteroblepa, 341, 351, 356, 372, 375, 376 
greenmani, 375 


312, 315, 323, 324.e¢2e 


melanostigma, 370 


Vor. XXXIX] 


Lichia, 228 

albacora, 222, 223, 248 

glauca, 246 

quiebra, 221, 249 

tolooparah, 205, 207, 250 
Linsley, E. G., see Chemsak, John A. 
Liomera, 313 

monticulosa, 318 

rugata, 315, 318, 329, 330 

rugatus, 318 
Liostephania, 546 

species 1 Schrader, 540, 54.6 
Lithodesmium, 546 

californicum, 525, 529, 546 

minusculum, 525, 529, 54.6 
Lophozozymus, 313 

dodone, 315, 319, 329, 330 
Loripinus (Pegophysema) spherica, 33 
Loxodon, 391, 392, 405 
Lucina spherica, 33 
Lupa pubescens, 316 
Lycus, 144 

sallei, 144 
Lygaeidae of the Galapagos Islands (Hemip- 

tera: Heteroptera), The, by Peter D. 
Ashlock, 87-103. 

Lyropecten (Nodipecten) magnificus, 31 
Lysodermus, 339 


Macrora, 546 
stella, 525, 531, 546 

(Macrouridae: Pisces) from Hawaii and the 
western North Atlantic, Nezumia 
(Kuronezumia) bubonis, a new sub- 
genus and species of grenadier, by 
Tomio Iwamoto, 507-516. 

Malacocephalus, 507, 508, 509 

Malea ringens, 29 

Mandra, Highoohi, see Mandra, York T. 


Mandra, York T., A. L. Brigger, and 
Highoohi Mandra, Chemical extraction 
techniques to _ free _ fossil _ silico- 


flagellates from marine sedimentary 
rocks, 273-284. 

Mangelia, 29 

hancocki, 29 

Marianas Islands, A new lizard of the genus 
Emoia (Scincidae) from the, by 
Walter C. Brown and Marjorie V. C. 
Falanruw, 105-110. 


INDEX 571 


McCosker, John E., Two new genera and two 
new species of western Pacific snake- 
eels (Apodes: Ophichthidae), 111-120. 
Mecas, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 
159, 161, 169, 174, 179, 180 
albovitticollis, 179 
ambigena, 143, 149, 173, 174, 177 
bicallosa, 142, 143, 149, 172, 173, 178 
brevicollis, 179 
cana, 141, 142, 177, 178 
cana cana, 149, 178 
cana saturnina, 143, 145, 149, 179 
cineracea, 142, 143, 148, 165, 166, 173, 


178 
cinerea, 141, 142, 143, 144, 149, 167, 
168, 169 


cirrosa, 143, 149, 171, 172 

confusa, 142, 143, 145, 148, 163, 164, 
165, 178 

discovittata, 170 

(Dylobolus), 148, 153 

(Dylobolus) rotundicollis, 153, 154, 156, 
158 

femoralis, 141, 143, 144, 148, 165, 166 

humeralis, 143, 149, 172 

inornata, 142, 143, 145, 146, 163, 167, 179 

laminata, 159, 161 

laminata discoimpunctata, 161 

laminata discopunctata, 161 

laminata rufobasalis, 161 

laticeps, 155, 157 

laticeps mediopunctata, 155, 157 

laticeps sutureflave, 155, 157 

laticeps vitticollis, 155 

marginella, 141, 143, 148, 162, 174 

marmorata, 180 

(Mecas), 148, 159 

menthae, 143, 146, 149, 174, 175, 176, 
177 

mexicana, 155, 157 

obereoides, 143, 144, 148, 159, 160, 161 

(Pannychis), 148, 149 

(Pannychis) sericea, 150, 151, 152 

pergrata, 141, 143, 144, 149, 169, 170 

pergrata semiruficollis, 170 

pseudambigena, 173, 174 

rotundicollis, 143, 144, 148, 153 

rotundicollis mexicana, 155 

rotundicollis ruficollis, 155 

rubripes, 167, 169 


on 
~r 
re) 


rubripes callosoreducta, 167, 169 
ruficollis, 153, 157 
ruficollis mediomaculata, 153, 157 
saturnina, 142, 145, 179 
senescens, 142, 167, 169 
sericea, 143, 144, 148 
vitticollis, 155, 157 
Mecas Leconte (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), 
The genus, by John A. Chemsak and 
E.G. Linsley, 141-184. 
Mediaria, 54.6 
splendida, 525, 531, 532, 546 
Megapitaria, 28 
aurantiaca, 28 
squalida, 28 
Melosira, 54.6 
sulcata, 546 
Menippe parvulus, 318 
Metrarga, 96 
Miconia, 19, 20 
Microdonophis, 113 
Micrognathus, 137, 139 
(Anarchopterus), 137 
boothae, 139 
brachyrhinus, 137 
brevirostris, 139 
brocki, 139 
edmonsoni, 139 
(Micrognathus), 137 
(Minyichthys), 137, 138 
(Minyichthys) brachyrhinus, 138 
(Minyichthys) myersi, 137, 138, 138, 
139 
Microsyngnathus, 136 
Minous, 308, 339 
Mitra 
gausapata, 29 
lens, 29 
Modiolus capax, 28 
Modulus cerodes, 29 
Mohole Drilling, Guadalupe Site, Revised 
diatom stratigraphy of the Experi- 
mental, by Hans-Joachim Schrader, 
517-562. 
(Mollusca: Amphineura: Chitonidae), A new 
Hawaiian chiton, Rhyssoplax linsleyi, 
by Glenn E. Burghardt, 501-506. 
(Mollusca: Pelecypoda) from the Galapagos 
Islands, Description of a new species 
of Chlamys, by Leo G. Hertlein, 1-6. 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


[Proc. 4TH SER. 


Mugil cephalus, 77, 80, 83 
Muscular anatomy of the forelimb of the 
sea otter (Enhydra lutris), by L. D. 
Howard, 411-500. 
Mustela, 390 
Mustelus, 257, 258, 263, 264, 269, 270, 389, 
390, 394, 405 
dorsalis, 258 
felis, 393 
henlei, 257, 258, 264 
megalopterus, 258, 264 
nigropunctatus, 258, 264, 392, 393 
Mylopharodon conocephalus, 76, 79, 82 


Naesiotus, 70, 11, 16, 21, 22 
eavagnaroi, 12, 14, 16, 17 
darwini, 70, 12 
deroyi, 9, 10, 12, 13, 20 
duncanus, 74, 17 
jervisensis, 17 
lycodus, 12, 19, 20 
ochsneri, 12 
rabidensis, 70, 12 
sealesiana, 17, 18, 19, 20, 27, 21, 22 
sculpturatus, 10, 12 
wolfi, 22 

Nassarius nodicenctus, 29 

Natica, 40 
darwinii, 40 
dubia, 40 
solida, 40 

Negaprion, 392, 405 

Negogaleus, 392 

Neotriakis, 257 
sinuans, 257 

Neptunus 
pubescens, 316 
tomentosus, 316, 317 

Nerita 
asperata, 41 
oligopleura, 29, 34, 41 

Nesoclimacias. 96 

Nesocryptias, 96 

Nesomartis, 88 

Neverita, 40 
reclusiana, 40 

New barnacle records, (Cirripedia, Thorac- 

ica), by Victor A. Zullo, Dea B. Beach, 
and James T. Carlton, 65-74. 


VoL. XXXIX] 


New Guinea (Carcharhiniformes: Triakidae) , 
with a redefinition of the family 
Triakidae and a key to Triakid genera, 
Gogolia filewoodi, a@ new genus and 
species of shark from, by L. J. V. 
Compagno, 383-410. 

new Hawaiian chiton, Rhyssoplax linsleyi 
(Mollusca: Amphineura: Chitonidae), 
A, by Glenn E. Burghart, 501-506. 

new lizard of the genus Emoia (Scincidae) 

from the Marianas Islands, A, by 

Walter C. Brown and Marjorie V. C. 

Falanruw, 105-110. 

species of the scorpionfish genus 

Helicolenus from the north Pacific 

Ocean, A, by Tokiharu Abe and 

William N. Eschmeyer, 47-53. 

Nezumia, 508, 509, 515 

atlantica, 507, 509 

burragei, 513, 514 

darus, 513, 514 

hebetatus, 513, 514 

(Kuronezumia), 509, 513, 514, 515 

(Kuronezumia) bubonis, 507, 509, 
510, 511, 512, 513, 515 

macronemus, 513, 514 


new 


Nezumia (Kuronezumia) bubonis, a@ new 
subgenus and species of grenadier 
(Macrouridae: Pisces) from Hawaii 


and the western North Atlantic, by 
Tomio Iwamoto, 507-516. 
Ninus notabilis, 97 
Nioche, 28, 34 
zorritensis, 28, 34 
Nitzschia, 54.6, 547, 551, 554 
bureklia, 518, 525, 531, 546, 549, 552 
californica, 525, 546 
cylindrica, 525, 529, 546, 550 
heteropolica, 547, 550 
invisa, 547, 552, 553 
jouseae, 524, 525, 526, 529, 547 
kanayensis, 518, 547, 552 
marina, 549 
miocenica, 524, 525, 526, 529, 548, 550 
moholensis, 518, 548, 552 
porteri, 524, 525, 526, 531, 548, 550, 
551, 553 
praereinholdii, 525, 529, 531, 548, 549, 
S52, 
reinholdii, 553 


INDEX 


573 


riedelia, 518, 525, 531, 532, 547, 549, 
552 
rolandii, 547, 549, 552 
seiboldia, 518, 525, 549, 550 
species A Schrader, 531 
species 2 Schrader, 523, 549 
species 3 Schrader, 550, 551 
species 4 Schrader, 550, 553 
species 5 Schrader, 553 
species 6 Schrader, 552, 553 
species 7 Schrader, 550, 554. 
species 8 Schrader, 550, 554 
Nodipecten magnificus, 31 
Nofua, 342 
Nysius, 88, 89, 91 
baeckstroemi, 88 
marginalis, 89, 94, 95 
naso, 97 
nubilis, 91 
(Ortholomus), 91 
(Ortholomus) naso, 89, 97 
usitatus, 89, 90, 91, 94 


Oberea bimaculata, 145 
Odostomia 
(Chrysallida) rinella, 29 
(Menestho) aequisculpta, 29 
(Miralda) galapagensis, 29 
Oligoplites, 186, 188, 190, 191, 211, 212, 
P13 214 905. 278, 218, 2194970122 1. 
222. 228. D724 FI BIO, 34.2338 234, 
236, 237, 238, 240, 241, 242, 244, 245, 
247, 248, 249 
africana, 246, 248 
altus, 2135 2145 215 e2tgeee lO 220.5 2oe 
223, 224, 225, 236, 247, 248, 249 
inornatus, 215, 221, 222, 248 
(Leptoligoplites), 213, 215 
mundus, 213, 219, 223, 247, 249 
palometa, 214, 215, 217, 218, 220, 225, 
236, 247, 248, 249 
rathbuni, 221, 249 
refulgens, 213, 214, 215, 217, 219, 220, 
233, 236, 247, 249 
saliens, 214, 215, 217, 218, 218, 220, 223, 
2329334 296.1241, 247-248, 249 
saurus, 190, 213, 217, 220, 221, 222, 236, 
247 
saurus inornatus, 212, 214, 215, 219, 221, 
222, 224, 233, 248 


574 


Saurus saurus, 214, 215, 218, 222, 232, 
235, 237, 237, 238, 239, 242, 249 
Oligoplites, Parona, and Hypacanthus, with 

comments on the phylogenetic position 
of Campogramma (Pisces: Carangi- 
dae), Comparative revision of 
Scomberoides, by William F. Smith- 
Vaniz and Jon C. Staiger, 185-256. 
Oliva, 29 
Oncorhynchus 
kisutch, 76 
tshawytscha, 76 
Oostethus, 122 
Ophichthidae), Two new genera and two 
new species of western Pacific snake- 
eels (Apodes:, by John E. McCosker, 
111-120. 
Ophichthus, 113 
Orcynus, 190 
Orthaea, 98 
insularis, 98 
Orthodon, 83 
microlepidotus, 76 
Ortholomus, 88, 89, 91, 93 
gibbus, 93 
naso, 97 
usingeri, 90, 91, 93, 94 
Ostrea, 28 
megodon, 28 
palmula, 28 


Pachybrachius, 89, 98 
insularis, 98, 100 
nesovinctus, 98, 99, 100, 101 
pacificus, 101 
vinctus, 101 
Pachygrapsus, 324, 325 
minutus, 324 
planifrons, 324 
transversus, 312, 315, 324, 330 
Pacific Ocean, A new species of the scorpion- 
fish genus Helicolenus from the north, 
by Tokiharu Abe and William N. 
Eschmeyer, 47-53. 
Pacific snake-eels (Apodes: Ophichthidae), 
Two new genera and two new species 


of western, by John E. McCosker, 
111-120. 

Pacific, with a synopsis of the subfamily 
Synanceiinae, Two new stonefishes 


(Pisces: Scorpaenidae) from the Indo- 


CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


[Proc. 4TH Serr. 


west, by William N. Eschmeyer and 
Kaza V. Rama Rao, 337-382. 


Pacific, with comments on Scorpaenodes 
muciparus (Alcock), Two new 
scorpionfishes (genus Scorpaenodes) 


from the Indo-west, by William N. 
Eschmeyer and K. V. Rama Rao, 
55-64. 
Palaeoscomber, 190, 192 
spinosus, 190, 211, 212, 212, 250 
Pannychis, 141, 149 
ducalis, 151, 153 
sericeus, 151, 153 
Paragaleus, 392, 405 
Paraminous, 339 
Parapterois, 307 
Paratrachinotus, 243 
Parona, 225) 226, 22/7; (241247524 seeoa ae 
245, 247 
sienata, 227, 22%, 232:2oo coarse 
238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 247 
Parona, and Hypacanthus with comments on 
the phylogenetic position of Campo- 
gramma, (Pisces:Carangidae), Com- 
parative revision of Scomberoides, 
Oligoplites, by William F. Smith- 
Vaniz and Jon C. Staiger, 185-256. 
Paropsis, 225 
signatus, 225, 227 
Pavona gigantea, 27 
Pecten, 31 
antillarum, 4 
australis, 4 
benedicti, 4 
(Chlamys) coccymelus, 4 
(Chlamys) nympha, 4 
(Flabellipecten) sericeus, 1 
(Lyropecten) magnificus, 31 
madisonius, 4 
magnificus, 31 
(Oppenheimopecten) galapagensis, 1 
(Pecten) slevini, 28 
Pedipes angulatus, 29 
Pegophysema, 33 


Pelecypoda) from the Galapagos Islands, 
Description of a new _ species of 
Chlamys (Mollusca:, by Leo G. 
Hertlein, 1-6. 

Pelor, 339 


Peloropsis, 287 


VoL. XXXIX] 


frondosus, 292, 295 
xenops, 287, 292, 295 
Persicula, 29 
imbricata, 29 
phrygia, 29 
Phaenomonas, 116, 117 
Phytoecia, 141 
femoralis, 141, 147, 159, 165 
pipefishes, Five new Indo-Pacific, by Earl S. 
Herald and John E. Randall, 121-140. 
(Pisces: Carangidae), Comparative revision 
of Scomberoides, Oligoplites, Parona, 
and Hypacanthus with comments on 
the phylogenetic position of Campo- 
gramma, by William F. Smith-Vaniz 
and Jon C. Staiger, 185-256. 
(Pisces:Scorpaenidae) from the Indo-west 
Pacific, with a synopsis of the sub- 
family Synanceiinae, Two new stone- 
fishes, by William N. Eschmeyer and 
Kaza V. Rama Rao, 337-382. 
Plagusia, 312, 314 
capensis, 328 
chabrus, 328 
dentipes, 312, 314, 315, 326, 328, 329, 
331 
depressa, 328 
depressa depressa, 328 
depressa immaculata, 329 
depressa tuberculata, 329 
gaimardi, 328 
glabra, 328, 329 
integripes, 315, 326, 327, 329 
speciosa, 328, 329 
tomentosa, 328 
Pliocene fossils from  Baltra (South 
Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands, 
by Leo G. Hertlein, 25-46. 
Pocillopora, 321, 322 
damicornis, 321 
danae, 321 
diomedae, 321 
Pogonichthys macrolepidotus, 76 
Pogonophis, 113 
Pogonoscorpius, 285, 287, 303, 306 
sechellensis, 285, 287, 303, 304 
seychellensis, 303 
Polinices 
dubius, 29, 38, 40 
uber, 29 


INDEX 575 


Polycaulis uranoscopus, 373 
Polycaulus, 339, 372 
elongatus, 373 
uranoscopus, 373 
Polynices dubia, 40 
Porites, 73 
astreoides, 71, 72 
californica, 72, 73 
lobata, 73 
Porthmeus, 228 
argenteus, 228, 229, 230, 231 
Portulaca, 91, 95, 96, 97 
Portunus, 312 
pubescens, 315, 316, 317, 329, 331 
tomentosus, 317 
Prionace, 391, 405 
Pristipomoides microlepis, 57 
Proscyllium, 257, 263, 268, 269, 390, 405 
habereri, 257 
venusta, 257 
Prosopis, 179 
Prosopium williamsoni, 76, 81, 81, 83 
Protothaca 
grata, 37 
(Tropithaca), 28, 35, 37, 38 
(Tropithaca) grata, 28 
(Tropithaca) seymourensis, 28, 35, 38 
Psammocora (Stephanaria), 27 
Pseudoliomera 
lata, 314, 319 
remota, 312, 314, 315, 318, 319, 329 
Pseudosynanceia, 337, 340, 369, 377 
melanostigma, 341, 351, 356, 369, 370, 
Sf 
Pteroidichthys, 285, 287, 302, 303, 305, 306 
amboinensis, 305, 306, 307 
Pterois, 307 
sphex, 307 
Pteropelor, 285, 302, 303, 305 
noronhai, 305, 306, 307 
Ptychocheilus grandis, 76 
Ptychognathus 
easteranus, 312, 315, 325, 329 
polleni, 325 
Pyramidella 
(Triptychus), 29 
(Triptychus) olssoni, 29 
(Voluspa), 29 
Pyrene 
castanea, 29 


576 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


fuscata, 29 
haemastoma, 29 
Pyrgoma, 72 
Rama Rao, Kaza V., see 
William N. 
Randall, John E., see Herald, Earl S. 
Raphiolepus, 190, 192 
Revised diatom stratigraphy of the Experi- 
mental Mohole Drilling, Guadalupe 
Site, by Hans-Joachim Schrader, 
517-562. 
Rhaphoneis, 541, 554. 
angularis, 525, 554 
angustata, 525, 554 
margaritalimbata, 525, 554 
mediopunctata, 542 
mediopunctata matraensis, 542 
sacchalinensis, 525, 554. 
tatsunokuchiensis, 543 
Rhinichthys, 83 
osculus klamathensis, 76 
Rhinopias, 285, 287, 288, 289, 291, 295, 298, 
301, 302, 303, 304, 306 
aphanes, 285, 286, 288, 291 
300, 301, 302, 307 
argoliba, 285, 286, 288, 289, 290, 291, 
292, 298, 302, 307 
frondosa, 285, 286, 288, 291, 292, 295, 
296, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 300, 302, 
307 
godfreyi, 285, 287, 303, 305, 306 
xenops, 285, 286, 288, 290, 291, 292, 
293, 294, 295, 296, 298, 302, 307 
Rhinopias, with comments on related genera 
and species, Two new species of the 
genus, by William N. 
Eschmeyer, Yoshitsugo Hirosaki, and 
Tokiharu Abe, 285-310. 
Rhizoprionodon, 392, 405 
Rhizosolenia, 554 
barboi, 525, 529, 531, 554. 
hebetata, 525 
hebetata hiemalis, 554. 
miocenica, 525, 529, 531, 554. 
praealata, 525, 554. 
praebarboi, 525, 531, 532, 555 
styliformis, 525, 555 
Rhynchobatus, 394 


Eschmeyer, 


296, 298, 


>] 


scorpionfish 


[Proc. 4TH Ser. 


Rhyssoplax, 505 
linsleyi, 501, 502, 503, 503, 504, 505 
Rhyssoplax linsleyi (Mollusca: Amphineura: 
Chitonidae), A new Hawaiian chiton, 
by Glenn E. Burghardt, 501-506. 
Richardsonius balteatus egregius, 77 
Rissoina, 29 
firmata, 29 
signae, 29 
Robinsonocoris, 94, 96 
tingitoides, 88 
Rouxia, 555 
californica, 526, 529, 550,555 
diploneides, 526, 555 
moholensis, 518, 550, 555 
naviculoides, 550, 555 
species 1 Schrader, 555 


Salmo 
aguabonita aguabonita, 76 
aguabonita whitei, 76 
clarkii clarkii, 76 
clarkii henshawi, 76 
clarkii seleniris, 76 
gairdnerii, 76 
gairdnerii aquilarum, 76 
gairdnerii gairdnerii, 76, 87 
gairdnerii gilberti, 76 
gairdnerii stonei, 76 
Salvelinus malma parkei, 76 
Salvia, 179 
Saperda, 141, 142, 143, 147, 167, 173 
bicallosa, 166, 172 
cana, 141, 177, 178 
cineracea, 166 
cinerea, 142, 167 
concolor, 142, 143 
concolor unicolor, 143 
inornata, 142, 143 
pergrata, 141, 169 
Scaeops sechellensis, 303 
Scaevola, 110 
Scalesia, 11, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 22, 97 
affinus, 97 
gummifera, 97 
helleri, 97 
pedunculata, 11, 19 
Schrader, Revised diatom 
stratigraphy of the Experimental 


Hans-Joachim, 


Vor. XXXIX] 


Mohole Drilling, Guadalupe site, 517- 
562. 

(Scincidae) from the Marianas Islands, A new 
lizard of the genus Emoia, by Walter 
C. Brown and Marjorie V. C. 
Falanruw, 105-110. 

Scoliodon, 391, 392, 404, 405 

Scomber 

aculeatus, 229, 230 

amia, 228, 230 
calcar, 218, 220, 223, 248 
forsteri, 205, 207, 248 
japonicus, 212 

lysan, 205, 206, 249 
maculatus, 205, 207, 249 
madagascariensis, 194, 249 
saliens, 218, 249 

saurus, 213, 215, 221, 249 

Scomberoides, 186, 187, 188, 190, 191, 192, 
193, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 
201, 202, 203, 204, 206, 212, 213, 215, 
FAO. 231, 233, 234;.236).287, 238) 240, 
241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 247, 248, 249, 
250 

commersonianus, 190, 191, 192, 194, 195, 
196, 197, 198, 200, 200, 201, 202, 203, 
204, 205, 206, 208, 232, 234, 236, 240 
242, 247, 248, 249 

formosanus, 191, 205, 207, 209, 210, 248 

forsteri, 207 

lysan, 190, 191, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 
198, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 
207, 208, 213, 233, 234, 236, 237, 240, 
247, 248, 249, 250 

moadetta, 191 

noelii, 192, 249 

orientalis, 191 

oshimae, 205, 249 

(Rhaphiolepis) , 190 

saliens, 218 

saltator, 192, 218, 249 

sanctipetri, 191, 207 

spinosus, 192, 211, 213, 241, 247, 250 

tala, 191, 192, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 
199, 200, 200, 201, 201, 202, 203, 204, 
206, 209, 210, 233, 234, 236, 241, 247, 
248, 249, 250 

tol, 191, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 
200, 201, 201, 202, 203, 204, 206, 209, 
MONA 11 212,213, 232).233, 236, 237, 


INDEX 577 


238, 239, 247, 248, 250 
toloo, 191, 201 
tolooparah, 191, 206, 207, 247 

Scomberoides, Oligoplites, Parona, and 
Hypacanthus with comments on the 
phylogenetic position of Campo- 
gramma, (Pisces: Carangidae), Com- 
parative revision of, by William F. 
Smith-Vaniz and Jon C. Staiger, 
185-256. 

Scorpaena 

alepidota, 352, 353 
Bicapillata, 359 
bicirrata, 359 
Brachiata, 359 
brachion, 359 
frondosa, 287, 295 
horrida, 341, 352, 353 
monstrosa, 352 

Scorpaenidae) from the Indo-west Pacific, 
with a synopsis of the subfamily 
Synanceiinae, Two new stonefishes 
(Pisces:, by William N. Eschmeyer and 
Kaza V. Rama Rao, 337-382. 

Scorpaenodes, 55, 56, 58 

investigatoris, 57, 58, 64 
muciparus, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 
smithi, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 
steinitzi, 57 

tribulosus, 55, 56, 58, 59 
varipinnis, 57 

Scorpaenodes from the Indo-west Pacific, 
with comments on  Scorpaenodes 
muciparus (Alcock), Two new scor- 
pionfishes (genus, by William WN. 
Eschmeyer and K. V. Rama Rao, 
55-64. 

Scorpaenodes muciparus (Alcock), Two new 
scorpionfishes (genus Scorpaenodes) 
from the Indo-west Pacific, with 
comments on, by William WN. 
Eschmeyer and K. V. Rama Rao, 
55-64. 

scorpionfish genus from the 
north Pacific Ocean, A new species of 
the, by Tokiharu Abe and William N. 
Eschmeyer, 47-53. 


Helicolenus 


scorpionfish genus Rhinopias, with comments 
on related genera and species, Two new 
species of the, by William WN. 


578 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


Eschmeyer, Yoshitsugo Hirosaki, and 
Tokiharu Abe, 285-310. 

scorpionfishes (genus Scorpaenodes) from the 
Indo-west Pacific, with comments on 
Scorpaenodes muciparus (Alcock), 
Two new, by William N. Eschmeyer 
and K. V. Rama Rao, 55-64. 

Scylliogaleus, 389, 390, 393, 405 

sea otter (Enhydra lutris), Muscular anatomy 
of the forelimb of the, by L. D. 
Howard, 411-500. 

Sebastes, 48, 51 

muciparus, 58 
Sebastiscus, 48, 51, 53 
marmoratus, 292, 295, 300 

Sebastodes, 51 

(Selachitz: Carcharhinidae), Ctenacis and 
Gollum, two new genera of sharks, by 
L. J. V. Compagno, 257-272. 

Selar, 244 

Seleastes daector, 359 

Selene, 244 

Seriola, 246, 247 

shark from New Guinea (Carcharhiniformes: 

Triakidae), with a redefinition of the 

family Triakidae and a key to Triakid 

genera, Gogolia filewoodi, a new 

genus and species of, by L. J. V. 

Compagno, 383-410. 

(Selachii: Carcharhinidae), Ctenacis 
and Gollum, two new genera of, by 
L. J. V. Compagno, 257-272. 
silicoflagellates from marine sedimentary 

rocks, Chemical extraction techniques 
to free fossil, by York T. Mandra, 
A. L. Brigger, and Highoohi Mandra, 
273-284. 

Smith, Allyn, G., Three new land snails from 
Isla Santa Cruz (Indefatigable Island), 
Galapagos, 7-24. 

Smith-Vaniz, William F., and Jon C. Staiger, 
Comparative revision of Scomberoides, 
Oligoplites, Parona, and Hypacanthus 
with comments on the phylogenetic 
position of Campogramma (Pisces: 
Carangidae), 185-256. 

snails, from Isla Santa Cruz (Indefatigable 
Island), Galapagos, Three new land, 
by Allyn G. Smith, 7-24. 


sharks 


[Proc. 4TH Srp. 


snake-eels (Apodes: Ophichthidae) Two new 
genera and two new species of western 
Pacific, by John EE. McCosker, 
111-120. 
Solagmedens, 246 
(South Seymour) Island, Galapagos Islands, 
Pliocene fossils from Baltra, by Leo G. 
Hertlein, 25-46. 
Spondylus, 31 
Stenostola, 141 
gentilis, 170 
pergrata, 170 
saturnina, 141, 179 
Stephanopyxis, 556 
turris, 526, 556 
stonefishes (Pisces: Scorpaenidae) from the 
Indo-west Pacific, with a synopsis of 
the subfamily Synanceiinae, Two new, 
by William N. Eschmeyer and Kaza V. 
Rama Rao, 337-382. 
Stoschia, 541 
admirabilis, 541 
paleacea, 541, 543 
Strombina gibberula, 29 
Synanceia, 307, 337, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 
357, 359, 363, 364, 365, 372, 375 
alula, 341, 347, 348, 349, 350, 350, 351, 
352, 350, SH7 
asteroblepa, 375 
bicapillata, 359 
brachio, 341, 359 
breviceps, 373 
elongata, 373, 374 
elongatus, 372, 373 
erosa, 363, 364 
grossa, 352 
horrida, 337, 340, 341, 343, 347, 351, 
352, 354, 355, 356, 357 
nana, 341, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 351, 
356, 363 
(Nofua) platyrhynchus, 340 
platyrhynchus, 340, 341, 342, 347, 351, 
356, 357, 358 
sanguinolenta, 359 
thersites, 359, 361 
trachynis, 352 
verrucosa, 337, 339, 340, 341, 343, 347, 
348, 351, 356, 357, 359, 360, 363 
Synanceichthys, 339, 340, 341 
verrucosus, 340, 359 


VoL. XXXIX] INDEX 


Synanceiinae, Two new stonefishes (Pisces: 
Scorpaenidae) from the Indo-west 
Pacific with a synopsis of the sub- 
family, by William N. Eschmeyer and 


579 


excentrica, 526, 556 

nativa, 526, 529, 538, 557 
oestrupii, 526, 536, 538, 557 
praeconvexa, 526, 538, 557 


Kaza V. Rama Rao, 337-382. 

Synanceja, 341, 342, 352 

horrida, 352 

(Nofua) platyrhynchus, 357 

trachynis, 352 

uranoscopa, 372 

verrucosa, 359 
Synanchia, 341, 342, 363, 364 

erosa, 342, 363, 364 
Synancia, 343 

elongata, 373 
Synancidium, 341, 343 

erosum, 364 

horrida, 343 

horridum, 352 
Synancya elongata, 373 
Synancydium, 341 
Synchiropus sechellensis, 303 
Synedra, 556 

jouseana, 526, 529, 531, 550, 556 
Syngnathus, 133, 135, 136 

balli, 135 

banneri 135, 136, 136 

caldwelli, 133, 134, 135 

dactyliophorus, 130 

maxweberi, 127 


Taenianotis, 307 
triacanthus, 307 
Tagelus, 28 
dombeii, 28 
Tectarius galapagensis, 29 
Tegula 
aureotincta, 39 
forbesi, 29, 36, 37, 38 
rugosa, 39 
snodgrassi, 29 
Thalamita, 313, 315, 329, 330 
Thalassionema, 556 
claviformis, 526, 529, 531, 556 
hirosakiensis, 550, 556 
nitzschioides, 526, 550, 556 
Thalassiosira, 556 
antiqua, 526, 556 
convexa, 524, 525, 526, 529, 538, 556 
decipiens, 526, 556 


species A (Burckle), 526, 531, 538, 556 
species 2 Schrader, 538, 557 
usatchevii, 526, 529, 540, 557 
Thalassiothrix, 557 
longissima, 526, 557 
Thaleichthys pacificus, 76 
Thoracica), New barnacle records, (Cirri- 
pedia, by Victor A. Zullo, Dea B. 
Beach, and James T. Carlton, 65-74. 
Three new land snails from Isla Santa Cruz 
(Indefatigable Island), Galapagos, by 
Allyn G. Smith, 7-24. 
Thynnus moluccensis, 205, 207, 249 
Trachicephalus, 337, 339, 340, 342, 372, 373, 
377 
elongatus, 342, 373 
uranoscopus, 341, 351, 356, 372, 373, 374, 
375 
Trachinotus, 191, 241, 243, 244, 245, 247 
ovatus, 241 
stilbe, 243 
Trachonurus, 509 
Trachycephalus, 372 
uranoscopus, 373 
Trachyurops, 244 
Trapezia, 312, 314, 321, 322 
areolata, 315, 320, 329, 330 
cymodoce, 315, 321, 322, 329, 330 
cymodoce ferruginea, 322 
danae, 321 
danai, 315, 321, 322, 329 
digitalis, 322 
ferruginea, 312, 315, 321, 322, 329, 330 
ferruginea areolata, 320 
hirtipes, 321 
maculata, 315, 321 
miniata, 322 
reticulata, 320 
wardi, 322 
Triaenodon, 389, 390, 391, 392, 405 
Triakidae), with a redefinition of the family 
Triakidae and a key to Triakid genera, 
Gogolia filewoodi, a new genus and 
species of shark from New Guinea 
(Carcharhiniformes:, by L. J. V. 
Compagno, 383-410. 


580 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 


Triakis, 257, 258, 263, 264, 269, 270, 389, 
390, 392, 394, 405 
acutipinna, 258, 264, 392 
attenuata, 257, 258, 263, 264 
barbouri, 257 
fehlmanni, 257, 258, 263 
habereri, 257 
henlei, 257, 264 
leucoperiptera, 257 
maculata, 258, 264, 393 
megaloptera, 392 
scyllium, 257, 258, 264, 265, 392 
semifasciata, 258, 262, 264, 393 
venusta, 257 
Triceratium, 557 
antiquum, 536, 557 
cinnamomeum, 526, 536, 557 
condecorum, 526, 557 
Trichophasia, 342, 372 
Triphora, 29 
galapagensis, 29 
panamensis, 29 
Trivia 
pacifica, 30 
radians, 30, 32 . 
Turbo, 40 
agonistes, 30, 36, 39 
caboblanquensis, 40 
vermiculosus, 30, 38, 40 
Turbonilla (Chemitzia) houseri, 30 
Turritella, 41 
alturana, 42 
broderipiana, 41, 42 
broderipiana marmorata, 30, 38, 41, 42 
(Broderiptella) , 42 
gonostoma, 41 
marmorata, 41, 42 
Two new genera and two new species of 
western Pacific snake-eels (Apodes: 
Ophichthidae), by John E. McCosker, 


[Proc. 4TH Serr. 


Two new scorpionfishes (genus Scorpaenodes) 
from the Indo-west Pacific, with com- 
ments on Scorpaenodes muciparus 
(Alcock), by William N. Eschmeyer 
and K. V. Rama Rao, 55-64. 

Two new species of the scorpionfish genus 
Rhinopias, with comments on related 
genera and species, by William N. 
Eschmeyer, Yoshitsugo Hirosaki, and 
Tokiharu Abe, 285-310. 

Two new stonefishes (Pisces: Scorpaenidae) 
from the Indo-west Pacific, with a 
synopsis of the subfamily Synanceiinae, 
by William N. Eschmeyer and Kaza V. 
Rama Rao, 337-382. 


Uranoblepus, 372 

Uranoscopus 
adhoesipinnis, 373 
indicus, 373 


Ventrifossa, 507, 508 

Verbena, 93 

Verbesina, 147 
encelioides, 147 

Vermicularia eburnea, 30 

Volvarina taeniolata, 30 


Xanthium, 145, 147, 179 
spinosum, 147 

Xyonysius, 89,97 . 
californicus, 97 
naso, 92, 94, 95, 97 

Xyrauchen texanus, 76 


Yozia, 140 
Zullo, Victor A., Bea B. Beach, and James T. 


Carlton, New barnacle records (Cirri- 
pedia: Thoracica), 65-74. 


Line 3 from bottom of table 1: for “Mugil cephalis” read “Musgil cephalus.” 


111-120. 
ERRATA 
Page 33. Line 19 from top: for “Lissophaira” read “Lissosphaira.” 
Page 77. 
Page 263. Lines 23 and 24 should appear in reverse order. 


gy 
| bey Mia, Peg io pte 
NN A meadajedth) oy 

Ar ibbtan ants TES NIGR) P' 

“haley! 
Vr es ae 
en a dopa ht GIF 
. mai abthin, 2 PM: IRM 
settings dg om ae; 


eo, 21 AIO P44 mr. £63 


wampab bacterin. Tus AN}, aed 
ea a ; 
ee: 
a) ria ei, 
—> moar OR Pay iy? 


Liven aw 4 wt 


PA We On. 


> 


0 Dae 
OVA 2 


a 
\ fue! se Minn Kghey ¢ 
tyme, Uie Paaiten 

pant aa! oe 
ue beet, FF 

- - Aw, 104 


| 
t 
is 

J 

4 ; 
i 

r 
Fs 
4 
) ‘ 4 
\ 
# 


An 
na 
i a 

s “h 


Ji 


Wo eae 


SPADINA NC Fee OI een re 


Fare oerneraems ee No apien Doses) mos AN sein hs 
SOME NA ew ee gran aie. 


tse 


ee 


ate oy pete 
Vo OP EOI. Faoy 

ai OE en ay 
[es mama pe 


rere thet 
oe ne 


seater 


Sree 


«MAUL tatne 


1 typ lowe +p: 


30 earn 


Co ae 


me ee Wr Lape pues 
Berea ~ 


ees ag 
ene Bn 6 


+ Steere 


SEP SYR eniie 


Mag ees ans 


Hp oo 
speray 


SEN Ns ig gh 
f ae hae 


SN arte kety 
= Aye eens y 


set bag aue A Ds wr 


ie Se Ee am ewer, 


eee, 
Vows. 


en 


senbwhont opvatipsa 
anaes 


are 
Rs 


eae 
NEW E ianen Ltgiyeuny : 
3 8th WED NS Ooi cysts 
PU eet are Mbps Nome 


eran 
aun