Skip to main content

Full text of "Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science"

See other formats


PROCEEDINGS 

of  the 


Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science 

MCZ 

HALIFAX,  NOVA  SCOTIA  LIBRARY 


MAY  3  0  2012 

Part  2 

HARVARD 

UNIVERSITY 


Volume  46 


2011 


©  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science 

Affiliated  with  Access  Copyright,  The  Canadian  Copyright  Licensing  Agency 

http://www.accesscopyright.ca 
Date  of  Publication,  December  201 1 
ISSN:  0078-2521 


The  Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  are  supported  in  part  by  a  grant 
from  the  Department  of  Tourism  Culture  and  Heritage,  Government  of  Nova  Scotia,  with  the 
support  of  the  Nova  Scotia  Museum.  Publication  of  articles,  principally  but  not  exclusively 
in  the  area  of  the  natural  science  and  engineering,  will  be  considered  as  well  as  papers  ema¬ 
nating  from  studies  in  the  health  professions.  Both  regular  issues  and  special  issues  devoted 
to  topics  of  current  Nova  Scotian  or  Maritime  interest  are  published. 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Peter  G.  Wells  (Dalhousie  University) .  Editor 

David  H.S.  Richardson  (Saint  Mary’s  University) .  Associate  Editor 

Gail  LeBlanc .  Production  and  Layout 

One  Oh  One .  Printing 

Roby  Austin  (Saint  Mary’s  University) .  Physics 

Nola  Etkin  (UPEI) .  Chemistry 

Mike  Dadswell  (Acadia  University) .  Aquatic  Ecology, 

Fisheries,  Tidal  Power 

David  Garbary  (St.  Francis  Xavier  University) .  Plant  Biology 

Bruce  Hatcher  (Cape  Breton  University) .  Marine  science 

Martha  Jones  (Cape  Breton  University) .  Estuarine  ecology, 

Invasive  Species 

Andrew  Hamilton-Wright  (Mount  Allison  University) .  Artificial  Intelligence 

Eric  Mills  (Dalhousie  University) . . .  History  of  Science 

Brian  Petrie  (BIO-DFO) .  Oceanography 

David  W  Piper  (BIO-NR  Can) .  Geology 

Martin  Willison  (Dalhousie  University) .  Conservation  Ecology 


Manuscripts  should  be  submitted  electronically  to  the  editor  (nsis@dal.ca  and  oceans2@ 
ns.sympatico.ca).  Membership  of  the  NSIS  is  open  to  all  those  interested  in  Science  and 
subscription  details  can  be  found  on  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  website  http:// 
www.chebucto.ns.ca/Science/NSIS.  Members  of  the  NSIS  are  not  required  to  pay  page 
charges  but  others  are  currently  charged  $25  per  page  to  help  defray  the  cost  of  publication 
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/Science/NSIS/index-new.htmI 

This  journal  is  abstracted  in: 

Biological  Abstracts 
BIOSIS  Previews 
GeoRef 

Zoological  Record 
CAB  Abstracts 


Cover:  A  Hoary  Bat  Lasiarus  cinereus,  one  of  three  bat  species  recorded  inland  and  at 
offshore  locations  in  Nova  Scotia  (see  Lucas  and  Hebda,  this  issue  pp.  1 17-138)  and  which 
are  vulnerable  to  injury  by  wind  turbines.  Bat  species  that  hibernate  in  Nova  Scotia  are  also 
threatened  by  the  white  nose  syndrome  (see  editorial  pp  111-114). 

Cover  photo:  Brock  Fenton.  Back  cover  photos:  P.G.  Wells  and  Brock  Fenton. 


PROCEEDINGS 

of  the 

Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science 

HALIFAX,  NOVA  SCOTIA  MCZ 

LIBRARY 

MAY  3  0  2012 

harvard 

UNIVERSITY 


Volume  46 


2011 


Part  2 


Editorial  -  Wells,  P.G.  and  Richardson,  D.H.S . Ill 

Errata  . 115 

Contributed  Papers 
Lucas,  Z.  and  A.  Hebda. 

Lasiurine  bats  in  Nova  Scotia  . 117 

Corkett,  C  J. 

Can  we  stop  the  Atlantic  lobster  fishery  going  the  way  of 
Newfoundland’s  Atlantic  Cod?  A  perspective  . 139 

Garbary,  D.J.,  J.  Ferrier,  and  B.R.  Taylor. 

Late  blooming  of  plants  from  Northern  Nova  Scotia:  responses 

to  a  mild  Fall  and  Winter . 149 


Quail,  J.W.  and  R.A.  Gossage. 

The  crystal  structure  and  quantum  mechanical  treatment  of 

the  anti-cancer  agent  Flavopiridol  (hydrochloride)  and  the 

chromone  alkaloid  Rohitukine . 175 

Reports  from  the  NSIS  Council 

President’s  Report;  Librarian’s  Report;  Editor’s  Report; 

Treasurer’s  Report . 189 


' 


r 


/ 


1 


Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  (2011) 
Volume  46,  Part  2,  pp.  1 1 1  -1 1 4 


EDITORIAL 

Celebrating  150  years  of  the  NSIS  and  Maritime  Science: 

Reflecting  on  the  Society’s  Role,  and 
Identifying  Future  Roles  and  Challenges 

The  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  (NSIS)  celebrates  its  150th 
Anniversary  in  2012.  It  was  founded  in  Halifax  in  May,  1862,  origi¬ 
nating  from  the  Halifax  Mechanics’  Institute  (1831-1860)  and  the 
Halifax  Literacy  and  Scientific  Society  (1839-1862).  It  was  originally 
called  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Natural  Science,  as  early  areas 
of  interest  were  geology,  minerals,  botany,  zoology,  meteorology  and 
physical  geography,  and  the  economic  potential  of  natural  resources. 
The  Institute  received  its  first  grant  from  the  Nova  Scotia  Legislature  in 
1867;  it  was  incorporated  in  the  Province  by  an  Act  of  the  Legislature 
in  1890  and  the  Revised  Statutes  of  Nova  Scotia  in  1967. 

The  NSIS  is  the  oldest,  continuous  scientific  organization  and  one 
of  the  oldest  learned  societies  in  Canada.  As  such,  it  has  been  a  focal 
point  for  the  important  role  and  contributions  of  science  in  the  Maritime 
Provinces  and  Atlantic  Canada  from  just  before  Confederation  (1867) 
to  the  present  day.  The  Maritimes  and  Nova  Scotia  in  particular,  with 
many  universities  and  research  institutes,  have  produced  a  plethora  of 
prominent  scientists  and  key  discoveries .  These  range  from  Abraham 
Gesner,  inventor  of  kerosene,  to  fundamental  discoveries  in  marine 
ecology  and  oceanography  (with  key  marine  science  laboratories  in 
Halifax ,  Dartmouth  and  St.  Andrews,  NB),  to  the  most  recent  recogni¬ 
tion  of  Willard  S.  Boyle  who  shared  the  2009  Nobel  Prize  in  Physics 
for  his  work  developing  the  sensor  widely  used  in  digital  cameras. 
The  Institute  played  a  key  role  in  the  establishment  of  the  Provincial 
Natural  History  Museum  in  Halifax.  As  well,  Nova  Scotia  is  the  home 
to  the  Pugwash  Conferences,  a  meeting  place  of  the  world’s  most 
prominent  scientists. 

Being  150  years  old  is  a  major  achievement.  The  organization  has 
been  a  stimulus  and  focal  point  for  scientific  progress,  reporting  and 
communication  in  the  Maritime  Provinces.  The  Proceedings  have  been 
published  from  the  beginning,  with  many  distinguished  contributors 
writing  on  a  wide  spectrum  of  topics.  Each  year  the  NSIS  organizes  a 
lecture  series  that  includes  topics  of  current  interest.  Over  the  years, 


112 


WELLS  AND  RICHARDSON 


hundreds  of  monthly  lectures  have  been  given,  communicating  scientific 
research  and  achievements  to  members  and  to  the  broader  community. 
The  lectures  are  often  published  in  the  Proceedings. 

In  this  issue  we  include  a  paper  on  bats  which  have  been  in  the  news 
lately  for  two  reasons .  Firstly,  large  numbers  of  migrating  bats  are  killed 
each  year  by  wind  turbines,  but  recent  research  has  shown  that  deaths 
can  be  reduced  by  50-75%  if  the  turbines  are  shut  down  at  low  wind 
speeds  when  they  generate  very  little  electricity.  The  second  concern 
about  bats  is  occurrence  of  a  new  fungal  disease  called  ‘white-nose 
syndrome’  which  seems  to  have  spread  from  Europe  to  the  USA,  where 
it  was  first  recorded  in  2006.  Since  then,  the  disease  has  been  reported 
in  many  states  and  has  spread  to  at  least  four  Canadian  provinces. 
Mortality  rates  for  the  disease  often  exceed  90%  for  bat  species  that 
hibernate  in  caves  during  winter.  In  addition  to  bat-to-bat  infection,  the 
disease  is  being  spread  from  cave  to  cave  inadvertently  by  cavers  and 
geocaching  enthusiasts .  The  concern  about  bat  populations  is  so  serious 
that  COSEWIC  (Committee  on  the  Status  of  Endangered  Wildlife  in 
Canada)  has  called  for  special  reports  on  three  bat  species.  The  paper 
in  this  issue  is  a  significant  contribution  to  our  understanding  of  bat 
biology  in  Nova  Scotia. 

The  year  2012  has  many  local  and  global  anniversaries  with  a  sci¬ 
ence  theme,  and  this  gives  us  pause  for  thought.  Locally,  the  Bedford 
Institute  of  Oceanography  in  Dartmouth,  NS,  is  50  years  old  and  is 
planning  a  book  detailing  its  various  achievements  in  ocean  science 
during  the  period  1 962-20 1 2 .  Rachel  Carson’s  Silent  Spring ,  published 
in  1962  to  alert  the  world  to  the  perils  of  toxic  chemicals,  galvanized 
a  generation  of  environmentalists  and  concerned  scientists;  Carson 
e  mphasized  the  wide  spread  use  and  impacts  of  pesticides ,  and  referred 
to  aquatic  studies  on  salmon  and  DDT  conducted  in  New  Brunswick 
in  the  1950s  by  Maritime  scientists.  This  influential  book  is  still  a  best 
seller  and  will  undoubtedly  be  celebrated  widely  in  2012.  As  well,  the 
active  American  Scientific  Research  Society,  Sigma  Xi,  is  celebrating 
its  125th  anniversary,  with  an  emphasis  on  how  science  serves  soci¬ 
ety  and  the  role  of  team  science  in  the  21st  century.  As  a  local  aside, 
the  ocean  liner  Titanic,  a  marvel  of  nautical  engineering  but  a  20th 
Century  example  ol  technological  hubris,  hit  an  iceberg  and  sank  in 
1 9 1 2,  a  fact  hard  to  forget  if  you  live  in  Halifax  and  visit  the  Maritime 
Museum!  The  liner  resting  at  the  bottom  of  the  NW  Atlantic  has  been 
studied  by  local  scientists  in  recent  years.  These  are  but  a  few  of  the 


EDITORIAL 


113 


current  science-related  anniversaries;  the  reader  probably  knows  of 
many  more.  Clearly,  2012  is  a  year  to  celebrate  science! 

Today,  NSIS  serves  Nova  Scotia  and  the  Maritime  region  of  Canada 

by: 

•  Providing  a  forum  for  scientists  and  those  interested  in  science 
to  learn  about  and  discuss  scientific  matters,  through  a  monthly 
public  lecture  and  discussion  series,  its  journal  (The  Proceedings 
of  the  NSIS),  and  its  website; 

•  Drawing  attention  to  issues  of  societal  concern  that  intersect  the 
natural  and  social  sciences,  such  as  education,  environmental  and 
natural  resource  policies,  and  ethics; 

•  Promoting  research  and  education  in  science  by  running  a  Mentor¬ 
ship  Program, conducting  an  annual  Scientific  Writing  Competition 
for  university  students,  and  supporting  Regional  Science  Fairs; 

•  Presenting  current  and  historical  material  of  Canadian  scientific 
importance  to  the  public  on  its  website,  www.chebucto.ns.ca/ 
science/nsis;  and 

•  Housing  the  NSIS  virtual  Hall  of  Fame  for  men  and  women  who 
have  contributed  significantly  to  the  scientific  activity  of  Nova 
Scotia,  Canada,  and  the  world  beyond  our  borders  (see  website). 

Noting  this,  what  should  the  NSIS  anniversary  mean  to  members 
of  the  Society  and  to  the  interested  public?  Celebrating  NSIS  in  2012 
and  the  achievements  of  science  in  Nova  Scotia  and  the  Maritimes 
brings  attention  to: 

•  the  pivotal  role  of  the  natural  and  social  sciences  and  researchers 
in  Canada’s  history  and  development  as  a  nation; 

•  the  cornerstone  role  of  science  in  Canada’s  future  prosperity  in  an 
ecologically  and  economically  sustainable  world;  and 

•  the  contributions  of  regional  scientific  societies  in  Canada  to 
communicating  science  to  the  broader  interested  public  and  to 
encouraging  careers  in  science  in  Canada. 

In  addition,  2012  provides  an  opportunity  to  celebrate  Maritime  sci¬ 
ence  and  the  scientific  enterprise  as  a  whole ,  in  all  of  its  dimensions  and 
with  all  of  its  societal  benefits.  We  can  contemplate  future  challenges 
where  all  branches  of  science  play  a  pivotal  role  in  our  society.  It  is 


114 


WELLS  AND  RICHARDSON 


an  opportunity  for  NSIS  to  enlarge  and  broaden  its  membership,  to 
distribute  its  Proceedings  more  widely  in  digital  and  paper  formats, 
and  to  reinvigorate  its  website .  20 1 2  is  a  time  to  defend  the  importance 
of  science  in  all  of  our  institutions,  especially  in  the  Public  Service, 
during  a  time  of  economic  downturns  and  debt-related  cutbacks.  It  is 
a  time  to  strengthen  linkages  with  other  scientific  organizations,  such 
as  the  Royal  Society  of  Canada  and  specialized  professional  groups, 
and  to  collaborate  with  the  scientific  activities  of  citizen-driven,  non¬ 
governmental  organizations.  It  is  a  time  to  sponsor  forward-looking 
seminars  and  workshops  so  that  science  and  science  education  are 
strong  players  in  our  future  Maritime  economy  and  culture.  Clearly 
the  NSIS  and  its  members  have  a  key  role  to  play  now  and  over  the 
next  1 50  years ! 


Peter  G.  Wells,  Editor 

David  H.  S.  Richardson,  Associate  Editor 


Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  (2011) 
Volume  46,  Part  2,  pp.  1 1 5 


ERRATA 


Eric  L.  Mills  and  Lance  Laviolette.  2011.  The  Birds  of  Brier  Island, 
Nova  Scotia.  Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  46 
(1)  (Special  Issue),  107  pp. 

Inside  Cover:  COVER  PHOTO:  Dr.  Richard  Stem,  Kentville. 

p.  3.  line  4  of  first  paragraph:  “(1981)”  should  read  “(1981a,  b)”. 

p.  10,  first  line.  Add  “Research”  before  “Station”. 

p.  16,  lines  28-29  should  read  “Merritt  Femald,  the  Harvard  botanist, 
also  visited  the  area,  landing  at  Sandy  Cove  on  Digby  Neck  ...” 

p.  48.  Figure  22  should  be  captioned  “Moulting  adult  Little  Stint 

p.  87.  The  last  sentence  should  read  “McLaren  (in  press)  mentions  that 
this  in  some  ways  resembled  the  non-migratory  California  subspecies 
A.  b.  canescens ,  but  adds  (in  litt.)  that  it  may  have  been  within  the 
range  of  variation  of  the  migratory  subspecies  A.  b.  belli  T 

p.  101.  McLaren  1981  should  be  re-numbered  1981a.  Add  to  the  refer¬ 
ence  list:  “McLaren,  LA.  1981b.  The  incidence  of  vagrant  landbirds 
on  Nova  Scotian  islands.  The  Auk  98  (2):  243-257. 


. 


Sr 


Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  (2011) 

Volume  46,  Part  2,  pp.  1 1 7-1 38 

LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA 

ZOE  LUCAS'  and  ANDREW  HEBDA2 

1 PO  Box  64,  Halifax  CRO,  Halifax,  Nova  Scotia,  Canada  B3J  2L4 
zoelucas@greenhorsesociety.com 
2Nova  Scotia  Museum,  1747  Summer  Street, 

Halifax,  Nova  Scotia,  Canada  B3H  3 A6 
hebdaa j@  gov. ns.  ca 

Three  lasiurine  bat  species,  Lasionycteris  noctivagans  (Silver-haired 
Bat),  Lasiurus  cinereus  (Hoary  Bat),  and  Lasiurus  borealis  (Red  Bat), 
have  been  recorded  in  inland,  coastal,  and  offshore  locations  as  of  Nova 
Scotia.  Although  these  records  occurred  over  a  century,  70%  are  from  the 
mid-1990s  or  later,  largely  because  of  research  in  mainland  Nova  Scotia, 
and  increased  interest  on  Sable  Island.  The  65  records  presented  here 
include  11 , 25,  and  29  for  Silver-haired,  Hoary,  and  Red  bats,  respectively, 
of  which  31  are  previously  unpublished.  Seventy-seven  percent  of  records 
are  from  August  through  November,  the  autumn  migration  period  for 
lasiurine  bats.  These  observations  suggest  that  most  autumn  occurrences 
of  these  species  in  Nova  Scotia  are  not  extralimital,  but  are  part  of  normal 
migratory  patterns  in  the  province. 


INTRODUCTION 

Seven  vespertilionid  species  are  recorded  for  Nova  Scotia  (Broders 
et  al.  2003,  Rockwell  2005,  Scott  &  Hebda  2004).  The  province  is 
thought  to  be  at  or  beyond  the  northern  range  limit  for  5  of  the  7  species , 
including  the  3  species  of  North  American  lasiurine  bats,  Lasionycteris 
noctivagans  (Le  Conte)  Silver-haired  Bat, Lasiurus  cinereus  (Palisot  de 
Beauvois)  Hoary  Bat,  and  Lasiurus  borealis  (Muller)  Red  Bat  (Broders 
et  al.  2003,  van  Zyll  de  Jong  1985).  In  June- August  2003,  during  a 
province-wide  survey,  Rockwell  (2005)  recorded  >10,000  identifiable 
echolocation  sequences,  of  which  only  0.4%  were  from  lasiurine  bats. 
Broders  et  al.  (2003)  suggest  that  the  lack  of  detection  of  these  spe¬ 
cies  in  mid-summer  in  the  forested  areas  of  Kejimkujik  National  Park 
and  during  September  (migration  period)  at  islands  in  southwestern 
Nova  Scotia,  demonstrates  that  there  are  no  significant  populations 
of  lasiurine  bats  in  Nova  Scotia.  They  conclude  that  records  for  these 
species,  including  a  Red  Bat  breeding  record  from  Yarmouth  County, 
are  likely  extralimital.  Extensive  monitoring  programs  continued  since 
2003  in  mainland  Nova  Scotia  during  summer,  and  to  a  lesser  extent 


118 


LUCAS  AND  HEBDA 


in  autumn,  appears  to  support  this  conclusion.  Of  the  thousands  of 
echolocation  records  collected,  very  few  lasiurine  bats  were  recorded 
(pers .  comm .  H .  Broders ,2011). 

Lasiurine  bats  are  highly  migratory,  some  moving  south  hundreds 
of  kilometres  during  autumn  (Cryan  2003,  van  Zyll  de  Jong  1985). 
Silver-haired,  Hoary,  and  Red  bats  are  generally  solitary,  but  during 
migration  may  form  flocks  of  >100  individuals  (Carter  1950,  Miller 
1 897) .  Fenton  (1983)  notes  that  the  rearing  of  young  in  midsummer  is 
followed  by  mating  season  and  migration,  a  period  during  which  bats 
of  temperate  areas  become  vagrants;  this  can  result  in  bats  turning  up 
in  unexpected  locations  such  as  ships  at  sea  and  far  offshore  islands. 

We  first  review  prior  distributional  and  migratory  knowledge  of 
lasiurine  bats  found  in  Nova  Scotia  in  the  context  of  their  biology  in 
North  America.  We  then  provide  data  on  new  records  in  Nova  Scotia 
and  discuss  this  in  terms  of  the  underlying  ecology  of  the  three  species. 

Silver-haired  Bat 

The  Silver-haired  Bat  (mean  weight  11  g,  wingspan  27-31  cm;  van 
Zyll  de  Jong  1985)  ranges  from  southeastern  Alaska  and  much  of 
Canada ,  with  a  maximum  latitude  of  6 1  °07  ’ N  (Cryan  2003 ,  Hall  1981), 
and  extends  south  to  northern  Mexico  (Cryan  2003).  This  species  is 
relatively  scarce  in  eastern  Canada,  but  fairly  common  across  central 
North  America  (Hall  1981,  Peterson  1 966) .  Over  most  of  its  range ,  both 
sexes  fly  south  between  middle  of  August  and  early  October.  Records 
along  northern  parts  of  the  Atlantic  Coast  in  autumn  indicate  that  some 
Silver-haired  Bats  may  migrate  along  coastlines  (Cryan  2003) .  Banfield 
(1974)  notes  that  Silver-haired  Bats  have  “been  observed  migrating  in 
flocks,  far  at  sea,  off  the  east  coast  of  the  United  States,  and  have  been 
blown  as  far  as  Bermuda  in  autumn  storms”.  This  species  apparently 
has  well-developed  homing  instinct  (Nowak  1 994) .  In  the  eastern  USA 
they  winter  mainly  at  mid  latitudes,  approximately  south  of  Michigan 
and  east  of  the  Mississippi  River  (Cryan  2003,  van  Zyll  de  Jong  1985). 
Van  Zyll  de  Jong  (1985)  states  that  they  have  been  captured  flying  at 
temperatures  below  freezing  (-2°C)  and  will  hibernate  north  approxi¬ 
mately  to  the  -6.7°C  mean  daily  minimum  January  isotherm.  Cryan 
(2003)  notes  occasional  reports  of  Silver-haired  Bats  hibernating  in 
caves,  mines  and  trees.  Previous  winter  records  for  Canada  are  known 
from  southern  Ontario,  southwestern  British  Columbia,  and  mainland 
Nova  Scotia  (Moseley  2007a,  Moseley  2007b,  Peterson  1966,  van  Zyll 


LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA 


119 


de  Jong  1985),  and  include  1  bat  found  clinging  to  a  stone  pillar  on 
December  16, 1959,  in  Rondeau  Provincial  Park,  Ontario. 

Hoary  Bat 

The  Hoary  Bat  (mean  weight  27.6  g,  wingspan  34-41  cm;  van  Zyll 
de  Jong  1985)  has  the  most  extensive  range  of  any  New  World  bat, 
extending  from  Canada  south  to  Chile  and  Argentina  (Cryan  2003). 
It  occurs  throughout  most  of  North  America  south  of  the  tree  line 
(Cryan  2003,  van  Zyll  de  Jong  1985).  Monitoring  with  bat  detectors 
has  established  that  this  species  is  widely  distributed  in  Canada  and 
is  common  in  many  areas,  although  the  species  is  seldom  sighted. 
Individuals  have  been  recorded  far  beyond  areas  that  are  considered 
suitable  habitat  (van  Zyll  de  Jong  1985),  as  far  north  as  Bear  Island, 
at  the  northwest  end  of  Hudson  Bay  and  more  than  500  miles  above 
the  treeline  (Hitchcock  1943).  Records  indicate  coastward  movement 
during  late  summer  (Cryan  2003).  Fall  migration  takes  place  from 
mid- August  to  October,  and  most  are  thought  to  winter  in  southern 
USA  and  Mexico.  There  are  few  records  for  November-February 
north  of  Georgia  and  South  Carolina  in  the  east  (van  Zyll  de  Jong 
1985),  however  several  records  for  Connecticut,  New  York,  Indiana, 
and  Michigan  suggest  that  some  may  winter  farther  north  (van  Zyll 
de  Jong  1985).  This  species  migrates  some  of  the  longest  distances 
of  any  bat  (Tuttle  1995).  Strays  have  been  reported  from  Iceland  and 
Bermuda  (Allen  1939,  Hayman  1959,  van  Gelder  &  Wingate  1961), 
and  some  have  landed  on  ships  at  sea.  Hoary  Bats  are  thought  to  be 
rare  in  Nova  Scotia  (Broders  et  al.  2003,  Scott  &  Hebda  2004).  How¬ 
ever,  based  on  echolocation  recordings  collected  in  2003,  Rockwell 
(2005)  suggests  that  they  are  more  common  in  summer  than  direct 
observations  indicate. 

Red  Bat 

The  Red  Bat  (mean  weight  12.5  g,  wingspan  28-33  cm;  van  Zyll  de 
Jong  1985)  occurs  throughout  much  of  eastern  North  America,  generally 
east  of  the  continental  divide  in  southern  Canada  from  the  Maritimes 
to  Saskatchewan,  south  to  northeastern  Mexico  (Cryan  2003,  Hall 
1981,  van  Zyll  de  Jong  1 985) .  The  northernmost  record  is  at  57°  1 5  ’ N 
(Hall  1981).  Fall  migration  begins  in  late  August  and  September  and 
continues  into  October.  Movements  during  autumn  are  oriented  east  and 
south  (Cryan  2003).  The  relatively  high  densities  after  June  along  the 
Atlantic  Coast  (north  of  New  York  City)  may  indicate  coastal  migration 


120 


LUCAS  AND  HEBDA 


during  autumn  (Cryan  2003).  They  winter  generally  south  of  latitude 
40°N  (van  Zyll  de  Jong  1985),  throughout  southeastern  USA  and  into 
northeastern  Mexico.  Cryan  (2003)  notes  that  winter  concentrations 
are  highest  in  coastal  Atlantic  and  Gulf  of  Mexico  regions.  Known 
to  survive  temperatures  as  low  as  -5°C,  this  species  responds  to  sub¬ 
freezing  temperatures  by  increasing  metabolism  just  enough  to  keep 
its  body  temperature  above  the  critical  lower  limit  (van  Zyll  de  Jong 
1985).  They  are  strong  flyers  with  propensity  to  wander,  sometimes 
landing  on  ships  at  sea  or  oceanic  islands ,  especially  Bermuda  (Findley 
&  Jones  1964,  van  Gelder  &  Wingate  1961).  Most  oceanic  records 
are  from  late  August  and  September  (van  Zyll  de  Jong  1985).  In  Nova 
Scotia,  Red  Bats  are  rare  but  probably  widespread,  and  a  confirmed 
breeding  there  in  2001  was  a  first  for  Atlantic  Canada  (Broders  et  al. 
2003) .  Three  of  the  4  previously  published  extralimital  or  extraseasonal 
records  for  Nova  Scotia  have  been  from  vessels  off  the  southwest  coast 
of  the  province  (Brown  1953,  Norton  1930,  Peterson  1970). 

METHODS 

We  reviewed  published  records,  fluid-preserved  carcasses,  skins, 
photographs,  and  reliable  sight  records  (based  on  details  provided  and/ 
or  known  experience  of  the  observer),  and  solicited  information  from 
birders.  Although  bats  represented  by  sight  records  were  not  captured 
and  examined,  in  Red  Bats  sex  could  be  determined  because  of  the 
marked  colour  difference  between  the  males  and  females  of  this  species . 
Locations  of  occurrences  are  categorized  as  inland,  coastal,  coastal 
island,  Sable  Island,  and  vessel.  Sable  Island  (44°N,  60°W),  the  most 
offshore  of  Nova  Scotia’s  islands,  is  approximately  160  km  southeast 
of  Canso,  Nova  Scotia,  the  nearest  landfall.  The  island  is  roughly  45 
km  in  length  with  a  maximum  width  of  1.5  km,  and  surface  area  of 
3200  ha,  30%  of  which  is  vegetated.  However,  except  for  a  solitary 
50  cm  high  Scots  Pine  Pinus  sylvestris  Linnaeus,  the  island  is  treeless 
(Catling  et  al.  1984)  and  does  not  offer  suitable  foraging  and  roosting 
habitat  for  lasiurine  bats. 


RESULTS 

Review  of  documents  and  specimens  resulted  in  65  records  (11 
Silver-haired,  25  Hoary,  and  29  Red  bats)  in  Nova  Scotia  (Figs  1, 
2,  and  3,  and  Tables  1, 2,  3,  and  4).  Ot  these,  16  are  represented  by 


LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA 


121 


Silver-haired  Bat  records. 


Hoary  Bat  records. 


o 


75 


150 


122 


LUCAS  AND  HEBDA 


•  • 


Fig  3  Red  Bat  records. 


Table  1  Summary  of  records  of  tree  bats  in  Nova  Scotia 


Silver-haired 

Hoary 

Red 

Total 

Total  records 

11 

25 

29 

65 

Published 

2 

20 

12 

34 

Unpublished 

9 

5 

17 

31 

Record  Type 

Specimen 

2 

7 

7 

16 

Photo 

6 

2 

7 

15 

Sight 

3 

5 

10 

18 

Echolocation 

11 

4 

15 

Not  recorded 

1 

1 

Total  individuals 

12 

291 

341 

75 

1  Includes  echolocation  records  as  one  bat  each 


Table  2  Silver-haired  Bat  records  for  Nova  Scotia 


LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA  123 


Ui 

a* 

> 

u 

a> 

n 

£ 


a> 

cj 

G 

£ 

as 


x 

s- 

© 

w 

£ 


S 

S3 


© 

SO 

a 


* 

© 

C/0 


u 

£ 

E 

s 

Z 


in 

V© 

O' 


C/3 
£ 
o 
fc 

3 
3  ro 
4> 


© 

c 

X 


3 

~ 

X) 

4> 

E 


x„ 

3 

t*" 

o 

o 

<N 

_CJ 

4> 

C/3 

O 


© 


C/3 

3 

cj 

3 

J 


C/3 

4> 

3 

O 

OQ 


CA 

3 

O 

3 

— 1 


C/3 

3 

4) 

3 


.<D 

N 

C 

<u 

£  2 


4) 

03 


CO  C*  < 


oo  N  oo  N 


J  J  * 
N  N  CQ 


C/3 

>-» 

"O 

3 

-4—4 

C/3 

Tf 

CO 

o 

in 

co 

CO 


r- 

on 


C/3 

o 

o 

X 

Q. 


o  o  o  o 


x  x 


o 

cj 

4> 


o 
o 

ON 

in 

oooor- 
x  x  x  x 
a,  Qu  Q,  Q.  “O 

—  (N  CO  Tj-  on 

O  (N  (N|  N  ON 

O  O  O  O  oo 


- 


^  oc  oc  oo  oo  in 

t. 


i--  r-  r-~  r-~  r~ 


|  s  h 

•5  ©  pa 

o  X  rj 
4)  CL, 

”8  2 

O  o 

o  00 
x  r- 


00 

Z 


SxxxSSSSS 

c/3  bp  bo  00  00  00  00  00  00 

zSSSzzzzz 


£  s  2 

^  £ 
x  Z  a! 


E 

a, 

o 

o 

CN 


,3  (M 
00 

X  2 

o 

3  X 

x  q 

••  o 
&0  _e 


60 

60 


C 

o 


60 
.3 
*■*— » 
3 
3 
3 
4) 


J* 

•«~ 

c3 

•— 

c3 

<2  ^  © 

CL, 

Cu 

3  •'On 

0  £  «- 
x  •-  2 

13 

c 

c 

u,  —  X 

#o 
’■*— > 

*4— » 

3  ^3 

OC  g  I 

a 

cd 

Uh  •— 1  - - - 

q 

l+N 

o 

£ 

4) 

X 

60 

.3 

‘E 

3 

O 

E 

3" 

4> 

<D 


C/3 

3 

<D 

> 

4> 


<U 

_> 

3 

60 

4) 

3 

C/3 

4) 

X 

2  8 
o  2 

<4—  (U 


CL, 

S  q  0 
S  w>.S 
“  2  T3 

0)  •-  4) 

3 

4> 

0 

Ih 
CJ 

C/3 


60 

3 


X 
3 

3  <U 


E 

o 

E 


3 

O 

C/3 

3 

<D 

>  -a 


3 

x 

E 

"5? 

2 


Z 

M 

'E1 

£ 

'a? 

2 


2  O'! 

—  3 

3  3 


3  X 

CQ  ^ 
3  <u 
X  Q, 

3 

i  & 

£  s§ 


On  -*3- 
60  o 


.5  3  <u 


"2  150 

§  .S 

£  to 

X  4) 
-  tn 


-a 
s 
3 

60  •"  8 
3  60  bl 
3 


3 


60 


4) 

> 


00  00 


n  c/3 
X  (U 

3  *-  — 

2  ~  ~ 

CQ  00  00 


3 

< 


4) 

u- 


3 

2  ^  X 

1  —  in  cn  04 

Sd'  CL,  O,  £  ^ 

,2  <u  <u  2  2 

2  00  00  O  Q 


o 

m 


X 

e'¬ 


en  x  On  cn 
00  On  On  O  O 


On  On  On  ON  On  O  O 


m  m 
o  o 
o  o 


Uh 


(N  CS  <N  <N 


tt-  s  s 


-a 

<0 

C/3 

3 

_0J 

(U 

!— 


60 

‘S 

-a 


o 

o 

-o 

_  <u 

C-  i—i 

O  o 
CL-  X 

o  ^ 

_  X 
X  o 
60  _ 
3  E 

£  •* 

X  X 

•4— »  ^ 

60  >> 
3  3 

^  CQ 

<D 

3  w 

n  in 

■9  •§ 

£  J 

4) 

— 

3  d> 

ai  c/3 

— 

00  > 


cn  ^ 
_ 

E-  3 

4)  <— 

00  ^ 

r-  o 
o  — 
o  o 

CN  CN 


CN  — 


-a 

■~ 

o 

CJ 

4) 

s_ 

"3 


3 

H 

w 

X 

4) 

u, 

4) 

4— * 

c 

3 

X 

4) 

!_ 

4) 

rs 

"c« 

3 

O 

CJ 

4) 

X 

2 

3 

o 

x 

A 

3  x 
^  c 
3 


4) 

X 

3 

4) 

X 


3 

_o 

*■4— » 

3 


4) 

X 


O  i_ 

2  5 
Id 


3 

x  — 

4)  4) 

x  £ 
9  5 

S  - 

v-  x 

>>  u 

H  c/3 

>8  i 

«  CQ 

*-•  X 

—  aj 
X  L- 
3  ’3 

©  x 

60  q 

,S  £ 

60  x 

.fSPK 

^  l+- 

3  O 
°  X 

*9  o 

CJ 


4) 

,S  5 

3  L- 

E  .2 

4)  X 

QC  h 


4) 

C/3 

3 

X 

3 

3 

Q 

x 

i- 

o 

o 

4> 

(2 

3 

O 

•4—* 

CJ 

_4L 

3 

U 

2 

E 

x  | 

3  2 
2  2 
£  3 

2  Z 

x  o 

3  co 

^  3 

00  Z 


124 


LUCAS  AND  HEBDA 


.2 

o 

o 

oo 

> 

o 

Z 


C/5 

T3 

u. 

O 

o 

o 


3 

CQ 


3 

O 

33 


fO 

o 


- 

> 

L 

4/ 

s 

-C 

C 

~4/ 

U 

c 

t 

a 

4> 

os 


'O 

•— 

o 

e 

a: 


c 

"•tarf 

cd 

1 


41 

M 

Cd 

Q 


41 

1/5 


U 

E 

H 


r-  r- 
X  X 
00  00 


in  «A)  OO 

X  sC  00 

O'  O'  o\ 


c  c 


c 

M 

Cl.  a*  & 
<u 


;o 

4>  4) 


c 

-*c 

3 

<u 


4) 

■o 

c 

3 

cd 


O  O  00  CQ  S 


c  c  c 

'm  3  s 

c/5  c />  c/5 

>L  >L  >. 

3  3  3 
3  3  3 

•M  ■*— »  ■*—> 

C/3  C/3  C/3 


o 

o 


o 

o 


o 

© 


-o 

•— 

o 

o 

4) 


o  © 

co  <n 


co 


co 
o 
tA 

— i  r- 

On  on  on 


o 

d 


00 

00 

© 


4> 

33 

3 

3 

cd 


4*1 

C/3 

>> 

•a 

3 


o 

© 

o 

o 

ro 

o 

oo 

© 


00 

oo 

© 

Vh 

4) 

•a 

c 

3 

cd 


c 

.2 

'C 

03 


2  2 


© 

o 

ro 

< 


.SP  .Sf>  1/5  C/5  C/5 

C/5  in  Z  Z  Z 


43 

.3 

c 

cd 

b0 

’C 

X) 

cd 


cd 

C/3 

Q- 

O 

■4—* 


<D 

x: 

■*— • 

E 

o 


c 

4) 

44 

3  _ 

©  X 

'IT  3 

o 


=  S  =3 

P  00  9 

Z 


o 

X 

cu 


o 

© 

U, 

cd 

x: 

2  x 

ii 

3  « 
oo  X 


x 

,3 


3 

X 

4-i 

o 


€ 

3 

Q 

4-i 

o 


*  3 


33 

C 

3 


U  U  c/5 


O  3  ®  (N  M 

00  OO  >  ^  0 
"  "  |  *  8* 


o 

O  oo 


40  4) 

■  l— • 

x  o 


o  c--  —i 

o  —  r- 


x 

,3 


3 

X 

4-h 

O 

•4— » 

u 


(N 

> 

O 

Z 

o 

00 

ON 


-o 

c 

3 

c/3  7= 
1—1  C 

4)  3 

gP  ~ 

Cd  H-H 
t:  4, 
O  3 
04  O 

c  •£ 

O  3 

CQ  I 


(N 


7t 

O 

o 

cs 

3 

© 

X 

4) 

X 

=8 


o 

4> 

oo 


3 

© 

X 

4) 

X 


T3 

4> 

© 

o 

o 

<u 


^t 

o 

o 

<N 

3 

© 

X 

4> 

X 

=3 


ro  ro 
o  o 
o  o 

O')  CN 

"3  ”3 


ininninmininin 

OOOOOOOO 

OOOOOOOO 

CNCNCNCNCNCNCNCN 


*-  O 
O  4) 

c  00 


c/3  c/3 

!-  !- 

4>  4) 

73  X 
O  O 
•—  v-. 

03  03 


4) 

£ 

x 

Q 

O 


4) 

£ 

M 

o 

o 


4)  4) 

£  £ 
-X  4* 
O  4) 

o  o 


4) 

£ 

-X 

O 

o 


4> 

£ 

X 

4> 

o 


4) 

£ 

X 

4) 

o 


qcqoqcCqcqcqopoqc 


c 

4) 

E 

’o 


-X 

C/3 

>7 

T3 

3 
•*— * 

C/5 


(N  (N  —  — 


^  ^  OO 

T)-  <N  —  — * 


X 


41 

'  D.  _  r 

3 

c 

c 

c 

c 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

X3 

-a 

V-I 

/*N 

X  d1 
on  m 

TD 

Vh 

_o 

_o 

_o 

_o 

_o 

_o 

_o 

0 

_o 

_o 

'sj 

CJ 

W 
( J 

00  2 

0 

(J 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

>n  0  0 

d> 

4> 

O 

O 

4» 

O 

4) 

4) 

4) 

4) 

4) 

u- 

Lh 

t"  x  ^ 

Vh 

O 

O 

_o 

O 

O 

O 

_o 

O 

O 

O 

•*— » 

r-1 

-*— * 

r- 

_  r" 

O 

O 

■o 

O 

O 

O 

O 

O 

O 

d 

.w)  00  d  00 

bp 

X 

4) 

X 

4) 

X 

0 

X 

a 

X 

0 

X 

O 

X 

a 

X 

4) 

X 

4) 

X 

4) 

c/5 

00 

Z  ~o  Z 

w 

w 

w 

PQ 

W 

W 

W 

w 

w 

w 

c^ 

3 

4) 

— 

4) 

> 

O 


X 

00 

3 

o 


c 

o 

o 

E 


a 


X 

bJ5  d 
•3  C 
c  3 

•§  u 

3  c/3 

42  c 

3 

4)  X 

bD  ^ 

p  J 

3 
X 


0X5 

eg  £ 
x  ’S 

OX)  ^ 
3  4» 

O  > 


t: 
o 

04 

c  c 

O  X 
OQ  W 


c 

o 

o 


cH 


X 

OX) 


-a 

c 

3 

>  2 
r9  4) 

U  ox) 

C/3  P 

%  9. 

5  0 

5  ^ 

c  C 
=  O 
Q  03 


3 

04 

"3 

.1  ^ 
®  -§ 
Z  g 
d  E 


0X)  4) 

c  .to 

•c  1/5 

3  73 
-2 

CJ  w 

>>  4) 


3 

X 

eC/3 
3 

:=4  O 

4)  4> 

^  * 

v-  C 
4)  3 

>  ~ 


cd  4> 

«  ‘C 

Z  CQ 


cd  o 
4) 
X 


c  c 

3  3 

a)  o  o 

x  U  U 

^  ^  Vh 

i-  4)  4) 

D  *-> 

■7  C/3  C/3 

X  4)  4» 

C  X  X 

:A  ~ 

3  O  O 

§  U  U 

r9  3"  3 

CJ  4»  4) 

^33 

S  O  o 

§  3  2 


c 

3 

O 

U 

C/3 

OX) 

c 


<4  3 

jES 

X  4)  4) 

>-1  -*-*  rr— 

3  73 

U  cn  d 

■o  S3  3 

£  >  O 

■S  2  u 

<D  ^  X 
X  4)  X 

c  E 
31/37= 
D  3  cd 

U  H  X 


<u 

C/3 

4) 

> 


C 

3 

O 

U 

Vh 

4» 

L-* 

C/3 

4) 

X 

O 

o 

U 

clT 

X 

4) 

3 

O 

OX) 

3 

E 

3 

w 


4 

5 

C/3 

X 

OX) 

3 

I 


0 

OX) 

3 

CN 

r- 

r~ 

(N 

in 

X 

}  t 

. 

CN 

in 

X 

(N 

On 

On 

1 

< 

1 

3 

0X) 

3 

< 

> 

O 

z 

0 

4) 

Q 

OX) 

3 

< 

Q. 

4) 

00 

Q. 

4) 

00 

3 

3 

“> 

X- 

3 

l— > 

OX) 

3 

< 

OX) 

3 

< 

OX) 

3 

< 

0X) 

3 

< 

OX) 

3 

< 

r^- 

00 

On 

4) 

3 

VO 

ON 

CON 

X 

On 

On 

X 

ON 

ON 

<0N 

ON 

ON 

O 

O 

O 

O 

cn 

0 

0 

CO 

O 

O 

CO 

0 

0 

co 

0 

0 

co 

0 

0 

CO 

0 

0 

CO 

0 

0 

P_l 

'  ’ 

1— » 

CN 

(N 

(N 

<N 

(N 

<N 

OJ 

<N 

ox 

S  S  2 


04 


LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA 


125 


o 

O 


u 

3 

£ 


w 

e 

a> 

u 

a> 


■O 

u 

O 

fj 

V 

pi 


s 

'O 

'£ 

« 

8 

- 


o 

w 

— 


a> 

1/5 


u 

JS 

£ 

9 

z 


N" 
o 
o 

<N 

3 

£ 

O 

t 

3 

O  N 


c m 
B3 
0> 

3 

J 


CM 

E 

3 


2  Q 
~  o  oi 

=  fs 

■ig 

3  O 
o  00 

o  r- 

1  s 

o  £5  .c 
W  Z  a- 


oo 

z 

o 

-*— * 

o 


<D 

>; 

3 

OD 

<D 

C 

-o 

CD 
-*— » 

CM 

<D 

■4— * 

c 

3 

O 

U 


•O  H 

N  ™ 

’£  'o 

CM  C3 

£  J=  -C 


3  3  3 

£  CD  O 

-  CM 

«  W  wT 
>  C  (U 

£  2P 
•—  c 

O  cd 

^  13 

j= 


3 

U 


CM 

0) 

,2  "O  r  ) 

X  «  u 

-  2 

<u  C  CM 

a  3  i- 

e  g 

oo  s 

<d 

>  cd 

—  CM 

a>  <S 
Z  c/3  > 


c 

3 

— 

3 

(D 

H 

3 


OO 

■*— > 

CD 

o 


vO 

> 

o 

Z 


<N 
CN 

D. 

<D 
OO 

r<o  m  o 
o  o  — 
o  o  o 

(N  CN  (N 


CD 


3  2 


CM 


£  Z  e 


<  Z  tt, 

—  CN  r*0 


126 


LUCAS  AND  HEBDA 


3 

M— * 

O 

CJ 

00 

CO 

> 

o 

z 


C/3 

"2 

o 

cj 

<u 


CO 

CQ 

TO 

<0 

a: 


£ 


u 

a/ 

► 

- 

o 

1/3 

£ 


4> 

CJ 

C 

a> 

u 

,© 

Cm 

a> 

X 


x 

3 

6 

NU 

_u 

Vi 

CN 

X 

cu 

cd 

55 

•— 

TO 

U 

X 

a. 

c 

CO 

CO 

CO 

C/3 

C 

TO 

<U 

TO 

M 

Z 

c 

"d 

o 

SO 

in 

CN 

CO 

o 

NO 

TO 

O 

o 

co 

o 

< 

0) 

E 

TO 

i— ( 

o 

00 

On 

OO 

TO 

M 

o 

'O 

o 

■H 

o 

■2 

o 

Q 

OC 

TO 

M 

O 

TO 

l— 

o 

00 

TO 

M 

O 

so 

CN 

o 

NO 

ON 

o 

D 

E 

X) 

u 

© 

r- 

ON 

s 

2 

C/3 

>, 

TO 

o 

o 

cu 

C/3 

>> 

TO 

c 

& 

o 

r- 

<n 

s 

r- 

ON 

s 

o 

<u 

■— 

4/ 

X 

00 

f'- 

s 

oo 

Tt 

00 

o 

(U 

On 

C/5 

cu 

<u 

i— 

4m/ 

X 

m 

t~~ 

S 

o 

■4— * 

O 

X 

cu 

<u 

t— 

4-/ 

X 

CJ 

2 

4-/ 

X 

cu 

<u 

c— 

X 

CJ 

<U 

X 

u 

S 

r  rs 

CJ 

(U 

Ih 

X 

CJ 

CD 

Ut 

X 

Z 

o 

-4—1 

CJ 

(U 

•— 

4m/ 

X 

oo 

s 

in 

r- 

s 

‘o 

<u 

X 

C/3 

00 

3 

o 

3 

1— 

o 

00 

bX) 

00 

< 

_bp 

00 

t-i- 

_M 

_M 

bxj 

_bp 

M 

CJ 

bxx 

00 

00 

a; 

DC 

Z 

Z 

00 

cq 

Z 

cn 

z 

s 

c n 

Z 

d# 

c/5 

OO 

cn 

cn 

Z 

00 

cn 

X 

cn 

Z 

Z 

c 

© 

■M 

CO 


M 

V 

(ZJ 


JS 

E 

s 

Z 


•»t 

© 

© 

CN 

CO 

-a 

X 

(U 

X 

=3 


o 

o 

C/5 


O 

co 


co 

m 


O'  ON 


c 

o 

t: 

o 

z 


c 

£ 

o 

!_ 

CQ 


O 

r~ 

ON 

c 

o 

C/3 

Ui 
<0 
•*— » 
<u 

Cu 


Nct 

o 

o 

CN 

CO 

-a 

X 

<u 

X 

<*! 


oo 

oo 

On 


(U 

X 

o 


c 

’c0 

£ 


X  ™ 

Oh'  CcQ 


CU 

TO 

c 

3 

cO 


O  — 


co 

co 


c 

o 


C/3 

>N 

c  ■§ 

o  x 

3  C/3 


Tf 

O 

O 

CN 

CO 

-a 
^  x 

>N  <U 

JS  X 

X  d£$ 

S  tt 

u  s 

->  00 


c 

cu 


c 

o 

E 

<u 

H 

4-J 

c 

W 


W  tu 


a 

co 

E 

3 

C 

H 

c/o 

fc 

3 

X 

00 

00 

X 


3 

CO* 


U 


c 

3 

8 

3 

3 

X 

d 


co 

o 

o 

CN 

"cO 


c 

3 

X 

„  >N 

o  3 

■5  s 


C/3 


00  <u 

c 

3 

*  g  . 

d  cq  x 


c« 

3 

CJ  2 
3  TO 

X  w 

n  d 


m 

O 

o 

CN 


<o 

£ 

J/C 

CJ 

o 

oc 


in  • - 


o 

o 


s  d 

M  3 

o  •  — 


o 

cu 

X 

vi 


O 

X 

x 


Q 

X 


o 

-4—* 

O 


3 

_o 

X 

3 

CJ 

o 


o 

o 

& 

0J 

> 


* 

.co 


3 

X 

<4-1 

o 

SO 

•4— < 

u 

<u 

x 

Urn 

c3 

<d 

z 


o 

NO 
NO 

o 

CN 
N" 

oo" 

Z 

_<o 

X) 

3 

<*>  X 

(U  <+- 
O-  O 
3 

u>  £ 

'o  J 

tS  3 
CU  O 
£  ? 

X  X 

3  3 

O  O 

C/3  C/3 

E  E 

o  o 

— 

CN  CN 


<u  <u 

C/3  C/3 

C/3  C/3 

2  £ 


E  | 

a. 

o  g 

CO  ° 

cu 
> 


co 


&o  — - 

c 

•  -  CQ 
TO  S 
cu  Z 

£  c 
—  x 
x  o 

bX) 

•  •*— 1 
-g  <* 


t-4 

3 

Oh 


00 

Z 

>N 

X 


On 

— 

r- 

ON 

bX) 

•4—* 

c 

OO 

3 

o 

u 

<u 

< 

o 

© 

CO 

ON 

CN 

CN 

in 

Q 

CQ 

00 

ON 

ON 

X 

X 


o 

CO 

o 

CN 

N" 


£ 

cm 

O 

X 

=  -a 

C  <U 

C/3 

E 

x 

in 

2t  d£ 

*•  4> 

Tu  > 

C/3  X 

c/3 

>  00 


o  ~  OS 

'  <N 

TO  _  m 

E^O 

ON  x 
X  h  h  X  X 
ON  On  ON  ON  ON 


3  tJ  C  X  X 

X 
3 

o 


03 

c 

bXJ 

TO 

TO 

o 

Q 

c 

C 

c 

-2 

_3 

03 

D 

Vi 

Vi 

z 

(U 

1—1 

cu 

bX) 

© 

bX) 

•  '“l 

flj 

3 

3 

X 

P 

tc 

*N 

O 

o 

E 

’flu 

X 

X 

*  7 T> 

C/3 

C/3 

3 

c 

<U 

JO 

O 

o 

> 

X 

m 

3 
C X 

bfi 

c 

o 

3 

CU 

2 

3 

E  c-i 

3 

bo  o 
C  X 
‘X  iq 

C/3  3 

tu  X 
1— 
3 

<u 

c 


X 

W»  o 

£  £ 
X  cu 
be  X 
3 
O 

3  o> 


c 

O 

o 

E 


E 

a. 


o 

o 

"S 

x 

3 

CU 


X 

.3 


3 

X 

<4-1 

o 

>N 


X 

bfl 


T3 

c 

<■+=:  c3 

°  - 

E  z 

«N>  QJ 

W) 

p 
o 
cu 

c 
o 
CQ 


cu 

X 

C  MS 

°  8 

cu  v 

>  Tt 

Xs  Ml 

oo  £ 

Z  ’S 


3 

o 


£ 


3  U 
C  3 
CU  (U 

o  OQ 

O  T3 

Tt  £ 

3T  oo 


X  >N 
bo  3 
X  TO 

M1  TO 
3  . 3 

73  E 

bJO  „ 
C  0C3 
•r  M 

=  .S 

TO  T3 
TO  X  ' 
C  3 
O  X 


3 

<U 

cu 


c 

o 


X 

c/3 


o 

oc 


<u 

c/3 

C/3 

£ 


3  bC 
O  00 

6  3 

■rt 

o  fc 

Tt  > 

CN  o 

—  Q 

u  _ 

I  s 


<u 

c 

> 

3 

QC 

XI 

o 

o 


X  *- 

.M  ^ 

3*  ~ 


CU 

> 

O  .- 

bX)  00 
C  TO 


3  C 


a  “  -  „ 

M  cd 


C/3 

CU 

C 

CU 

I 

cu 

v. 

i— 

O 

X 


TO 

<U 

,<U 


-a 

c 

3 


c 

3 
p  00 
3  W 


Oi  »a  X 

^  n  co 


b/j 

'-a 

(U 

,<u 


Od 

X 

u 


X  cn 


<u 

C/3 
C/3 

- X 

00  00  > 


3 

<U 


OO 

4m/ 

o 

o 

—  CO 


c 

E 

3 

4—* 

3 

3 


CN 


O 

O 

<n  oo 

On  ON 
On  On 


(N 

r- 

CN 

CN 

NO 

o 

CN 

SC 

Tt 

CN 

00 

4-/ 

bxo 

X 

> 

> 

CJ 

bO 

CJ 

3 

© 

O 

O 

(U 

3 

o 

o 

o 

< 

00 

Z 

Z 

Q 

< 

o 

O 

00 

ON 

On 

On 

On 

ON 

(N 

On 

ON 

ON 

ON 

On 

ON 

o 

o 

o 

On 

On 

ON 

ON 

On 

ON 

o 

o 

o 

’““C 

y“^ 

’-1 

CN 

CN 

CN 

C 

3 


O 

O 


X  ^  2  X  2  X 


2  x  ^x 


C/5 

03 

O 

o 

E 

o 


E 

U/S 

m 

V 


<u 

X 


3 

3 

O 

U 

Vi 

C 

<u 

(U 

3 

a 


X 

c 

3 

CO 

o 

o 

CN 


CN  CO 


LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA 


127 


s* 

a/ 

a / 

Vl 

X 

o 

u 

c 

0) 

u 

A) 

a— 

<U 

04 


ns 

u 

o 

V 

& 


Cu 


3 


Tf 

3 

£ 


s 

4-< 

« 

CJ 

c 

- 


o> 


u 

£ 

E 

3 

z 


ITi  IT) 

o  o  o 
o  o  o 

<M  CM  CM 


M  J*C  J* 
CJ  CJ  cj 

o  o  o 


C/3 

3 

C/3 

3 

C/3 

3 

c/3 

3 

O 

cj  rt3 

O 

O 

3 

8  ^ 
1— 1  t>0 

3 

3 

-J 

J 

-J 

N 

n 

N 

N 

o  o  o 


c 

3 

c 

_o 

o 

_o 

■*— ' 
3 

•n 

3 

3 

o 

CJ 

CJ 

O 

_o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

X 

X 

X 

CJ 

CJ 

o 

w 

w 

PJ 

o 

X 

a. 


R  P 


cj 


oo 

t-~ 


o  o 
x  x 
Cu  o- 

00  —< 
cm  >n 
o  — 
00  oo 
r-~  r- 


"0 

l-H 

O 

o 

CJ 


X  ,Z 
00  GO 


E 

o 


c« 

5  3 

8  8 

|  E 

£  £ 
c-*— 1 

£  E 

x: 

—  10 
V  V  -S 
oj  iu  in 

‘S  •£  V 

h  o  • 
£  j*s 

.£  3 

t-  — 

>;  £ 

c  C 

o  o 

U  U 

«-  00 
C j  v- 
*->  3 

1/3  _Q 

.C  c 

2  g 

O  3 

U  J 


CJ 

X 

So 

w 

3 

3 

O 

U 


CJ 

c/3 

3 

_0J 

00 

^3 

CJ 

i. 

'S 

CJ 

3 

> 

0) 

-o 

< 

go 

T3 

3 

E 

CJ 

i-T 

CJ 

CO 

00 

_B 

— 1 

’■5 

«+- 

3 

ZZ+ 

CJ 

3 

X 

CJ 

C/3 

3 

1-4 

o 

3 

Q- 

X 

3 

C/3 

+-> 

CO 

_3 

T3 

"O 

3 

3 

3 

3 

O 

O 

c- 

(-4 

3 

00 

00 

3 

.E 

O 

-5 

<U 

,CJ 

U 

_> 

(+-< 

■ — 1 

1— 1 

_T 

00 

00 

S  S  2 

00  00  ,&0 
Z  Z  bo 


s 

o 

o 

E 

D 

ijjS 

oo 

.E  £ 
’S  - 

cj 

I>  C/3 

CJ  00 
So  .£ 
~C  -O 
3  r3 
CJ  3 

7  _D 

C/3 

00  c 
c  o 

2  3 

.  -4— ' 

3  GO 

^  X 
3  C 


3 


CO 


„  3 

so  *e 

3  ^5 

5.-0 

u  § 

s 

r  3 


3 

O 

•— 

3 

00 


-a 

cj 

,cj 


cj 


oo  J 
C  00 

x  V. 

0)  3* 

a)  ^3 

X  TD 


3  X  X  >T  —  i— 

oo  oo 


—  CO  3-  ^ 

00  00  00 

3  3  3 

<  <  < 


a 

o 


m 

> 

o 

Z 


> 

o 

Z 


in  o 

CM  <N 

a-  -y 
cj 

in  O 


co  cn  cn  in  m 

o  o  o  o  o 

o  o  o  o  o 

(M  CM  CM  CM  CM 


00  o  o 
o  —  — ; 
o  o  o 

CM  CM  CM 


£  S  S  S  S 


CM  —  —  <M  — 


"O 

CO 

x 

a. 

3 

00 

o 


-8*2 
T3  33 
CJ  3 

£  £ 

J3  .£ 

■§  -o 

a  3 

cj  R 

*  -8 

£-« 

3  c/3 

5  1/3 

O  CJ 
so  > 

b  cj 

x  ~ 

^  3 

X  <U 
.■3  x 

*  3=  d 

S,  2  o 

3  5  -x! 

B  o  B 

,<d  ^  in 


^  >  -c 
^  *- 


3  __ 

*•*-<  3 

O  X2 


3 


O 

CO 

3 


<U  CO 
w  P  CJ 

>  T3  O 

Z  § 

&  3 

o  <u 

E  <D 

00  3 
UJ  i£ 
c  3 
=  X) 

£  o 

^  x: 


<S 


T3 

<u 

1) 

X) 

(4-1 

o 

c 

_o 

’-3 

3 


13 

C 

O 

o 


<D 

E 
o 
o 

T3 
3 
XI 

-  ^ 

So 


<u 

c 

o 

c/5 

3 


<U 

C/3 

C/3  , _ _ 

>  rS 

■n  c/3 

C/3  0)  C/3 

.b  x  o 

[X  H  Di 


128 


LUCAS  AND  HEBDA 


specimens  (including  12  at  the  Nova  Scotia  Museum  of  Natural  His¬ 
tory.  Halifax;  2  at  Acadia  University,  Wolfville;  1  at  the  Royal  Ontario 
Museum,  Toronto);  15  by  photos;  and  15  by  echolocation  recordings 
(Broders  et  al.  2003,  Garroway  2004,  Rockwell  2005).  The  remain¬ 
ing  18  are  considered  to  be  reliable  sight  records  and/or  reports.  The 
earliest  are  of  2  Hoary  Bats,  1  found  in  Halifax  and  1  in  Sambro  some 
time  before  1864  (Gilpin  1867),  but  49%  of  records  are  from  2001  or 
later,  due  largely  to  research  in  mainland  Nova  Scotia  (e.g.,  Broders 
et  al.  2003,  Garroway  2004,  Rockwell  2005),  and  increased  interest 
on  Sable  Island.  Of  31  previously  unpublished  records,  11,  all  since 
1999,  are  from  Sable  Island. 

Month  was  recorded  for  61  records  (Table  5),  and  of  these,  47  are 
from  August  through  November,  the  autumn  migration  period  for 
lasiurine  bats.  Only  9  were  in  summer  (June-July)  and  4  in  winter 
(December-February).  Of  the  47  autumn  records,  24  were  coastal 
and  16  offshore,  on  Sable  Island  or  at  sea  (Table  5).  By  species,  7  of 
1 1  Silver-haired  Bats,  and  13  of  27  Red  Bats,  were  recorded  offshore 
compared  with  only  2  of  25  Hoary  Bats.  Of  the  40  individual  lasiurine 
bats  for  which  sex  was  recorded,  31  were  male  (5  of  7  Silver-haired 
Bats,  7  of  8  Hoary  Bats,  and  19  of  25  Red  Bats). 

Sable  Island  Records 

Useful  information  on  Sable  Island  occurrences  of  lasiurine  bats  is 
more  comprehensive  than  for  other  published  records  for  Nova  Sco¬ 
tia,  and  details  provide  additional  insight  into  their  behaviour.  On  the 
morning  of  September  14, 2002,  a  Silver-haired  Bat  was  found  in  the 
Stevenson  screen  (a  wooden  box  with  louvered  sides,  approximately 
one  meter  above  the  ground,  containing  thermometers)  at  the  Sable 
Island  Station.  The  bat  appeared  to  be  sunning  itself,  with  head  and 
back  exposed,  as  it  rested  on  a  slat  in  the  east-facing  (sunny  side)  of 
the  screen.  Later  when  that  side  fell  into  shade,  the  bat  moved  into 
the  sunshine  on  the  south  side  of  the  screen.  The  bat  was  gone  by 
early  evening  and  not  seen  there  again.  Occasionally,  during  the  next 
few  weeks,  a  solitary  bat  flew  around  the  buildings  at  dusk  but  was 
not  identified.  On  October  8,  2002,  in  late  afternoon,  a  male  Red  Bat 
was  seen  flying,  and  apparently  feeding,  around  buildings  at  the  sta¬ 
tion.  This  bat  was  observed  for  about  30  minutes  before  it  flew  out  of 
sight  towards  the  freshwater  ponds. 


Table  5  Location  and  month  of  tree  bat  records  in  Nova  Scotia. 


LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA 


129 


130 


LUCAS  AND  HEBDA 


2 

o 


13 

as 

s: 


<0 


LTj 

V 

S 

£ 


sb 

« 

'S 

x 


-O 

a 

U. 


u 

a» 

Q 


► 

o 

Z 


o 


a 

V 

C/3 


OXj 

s 

< 


c 

s 


SB 


00  i/~>  so  r-~  t" 

n 


(N  — 


— -  cn  m  m  © 


—H  - - 1  1— I  ffj 


m  —  —  in 


—  —  CJ 


M 


C/9 

_ ,  _  C/5 

■7-3  03  cB  — , 

c  «  t?  U  « 

«  3  2  J3  £ 

£  U  U  c3  > 


3 

o 


o 

o 

<N 

+■» 

!Z3 

3 

bfi 

3 

< 

I 

>> 

"3 


o 

T3 

Ih 

o 

o 

s 

bfl 

3 

3 

<U 

a 

-D 

bfi 

c 

1/3 

<D 
J3 
•*— * 

<U 

"O 

_3 

_c 

«— » 
o 
c 

C/9 

O 

Q 


LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA 


131 


In  2005 ,  all  3  lasiurine  species  were  seen  on  the  island .  On  the  evening 
of  October  25  2005 ,  Hurricane  Wilma  passed  100  km  south  of  Sable. 
During  the  afternoon  and  evening,  winds  gusted  to  1 15  km/hr  from  the 
southeast,  and  backing  to  the  east  and  northeast  as  the  hurricane  passed. 
The  first  bats  were  sighted  a  few  days  after  the  hurricane,  and  1  to  5 
individuals  were  seen  feeding  around  station  buildings  every  evening 
until  mid-November.  On  one  occasion  2  were  identified  as  male  Red 
Bats.  During  this  same  period  several  grounded  bats  were  recovered. 
On  October  26,  1  wet  Silver-haired  Bat  was  found  in  the  Stevenson 
screen  at  the  station  during  a  night  of  heavy  rain  and  temperatures  of 
10.4°C  to  15.3°C.  The  bat  was  held  indoors  overnight,  and  flew  off 
when  released  the  following  day.  On  November  15,  a  male  Red  Bat 
was  captured  at  mid-day  when  it  flew  up  from  leaf  litter  roughly  2  km 
west  of  the  station.  It  flew  off  when  released  after  being  photographed. 
The  temperature  during  the  previous  night  was  7.6°C  to  12.8°C,  and 
10.0°C  when  the  bat  was  captured  and  released.  The  single  Hoary  Bat 
from  Sable  was  found  on  November  16,  wet  and  torpid  on  open  ground 
at  the  side  of  a  cement  walkway  at  the  station.  Overnight  temperatures 
were  5.7°C  to  8.4°C,  and  7.1°C  to  8.4°C  in  the  morning  when  the  bat 
was  found.  It  was  taken  indoors  and  within  a  few  hours,  presumably 
after  warming  up,  the  bat  became  active.  It  was  held  for  three  weeks 
and  fed  an  artificial  diet.  In  captivity  the  bat  was  active  and  capable  of 
flight,  and  ate  regularly.  The  bat  was  returned  to  the  mainland  where  it 
•  was  weighed  (27 .6  g) ,  euthanized  and  tested  for  rabies  (negative) .  Two 
wet  and  grounded  adult  Silver-haired  Bats  were  found  at  the  Station 
on  December  29.  Overnight  temperatures  were  1.5°C  to  4.5°C,  and 
3 ,0°C  to  4.5°C  during  the  morning  when  the  bats  were  found  clinging 
to  a  cement  foundation.  They  were  returned  to  the  mainland  and  held 
for  four  weeks  but  died  in  captivity. 

During  September  2010, 1  to  2  bats  were  occasionally  seen  feeding 
around  station  buildings  after  dark.  They  were  identified  as  Red  Bats  on 
September  25  when  two  males  were  captured  after  they  hit  a  window 
and  dropped  to  the  ground.  The  bats  were  ‘in  a  clinch’  when  they  hit 
the  glass,  and  may  have  been  fighting  over  a  prey  item.  One  was  held 
briefly  for  a  photograph,  and  then  released.  On  October  20,  a  single 
male  Red  Bat  was  feeding  near  a  station  building  during  late  afternoon . 


132 


LUCAS  AND  HEBDA 


DISCUSSION 
Normal  Coastal  Migration 

Althouah  it  is  well  known  that  lasiurine  bats  migrate,  the  timing 
of  these  movements  in  North  America  is  poorly  understood  (Cryan 
2003 .  Nowak  1 994) .  Cryan  (2003)  and  Findley  and  Jones  ( 1 964)  used 
museum  records  to  examine  seasonal  movements  and  distributions 
of  tree  bats.  Cryan  (2003)  found  that  records  for  each  species  occur 
beyond  the  usual  summer  range  during  late  summer  and  early  autumn. 
This  expansion  may  be  the  result  of  mating  activity  or  population  in¬ 
crease  after  birth  and  nursing  of  young,  or  it  may  be  associated  with 
exploratory  migration  (Cryan  2003).  Cryan  (2003)  also  found  that 
these  3  species  occur  along  northern  coastlines  more  in  autumn  than 
in  spring.  He  suggested  that  this  is  associated  with  coastal  navigation 
augmented  by  exploratory  migration  and  increase  in  population  size. 

Some  bats  may  travel  with  migratory  birds,  or  use  the  same  migra¬ 
tory  routes  along  the  Atlantic  seaboard  as  do  many  birds  (Bleakney 
1965,  Maunder  1988).  Numerous  observations,  beginning  in  the  late 
1800s,  of  bats  in  late  summer  and  autumn  flying  near,  and/or  landing 
on,  vessels  at  sea,  flying  towards  land  from  offshore,  and  flying  along 
coastlines,  have  been  recorded  for  southwest  Nova  Scotia  through 
to  the  northeast  USA  (Allen  1939,  Bleakney  1965,  Brown  1953, 
Carter  1950,  Griffin  1940,  Mackiewicz  &  Backus  1956,  Miller  1897, 
Norton  1930,  Peterson  1970,  Thomas  1921).  The  number  reported 
ranges  from  a  single  bat  to  hundreds,  and  in  many  instances  the  spe¬ 
cies  were  identified  as  Silver-haired,  Hoary,  and  Red  bats.  Bleakney 
(1965)  reports  information  from  Brier  Island  fishermen  and  suggests 
that  their  observations  may  reflect  an  autumn  migration  of  bats  out  of 
Nova  Scotia.  Bleakney  writes  “Digby  Neck,  Long  Island  and  Brier 
Island  form  a  long  narrow  peninsula  opposite  the  coast  of  Maine.  It 
is  known  that  many  Nova  Scotia  landbirds  funnel  to  the  tip  of  this 
peninsula  in  late  summer  and  gather  in  flocks  on  Brier  Island  where 
they  apparently  await  favourable  weather  before  making  the  crossing 
to  the  United  States  mainland.”  Further,  Broders  et  al.  (2003)  note 
that  if  there  are  any  lasiurine  bats  moving  through  Nova  Scotia  in 
autumn,  the  northeast-southwest  orientation  of  the  province  might 
guide  bat  migration  towards  southwest  Nova  Scotia,  resulting  in  a 
concentration  of  bats  passing  through  coastal  islands  in  that  region. 
This  is  supported  by  the  autumn  lasiurine  bat  records  for  Nova  Scotia 
reviewed  here,  mostly  from  coastal  and  offshore  locations.  There  may 


LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA 


133 


be  some  bias  towards  a  higher  number  of  records  in  these  locations 
because  bats  might  be  more  readily  sighted  in  relatively  open  coastal 
and  offshore  areas.  Nevertheless,  these  observations  suggest  that  most 
of  these  lasiurine  bats  are  not  extralimital .  However,  some,  like  the 
“Wilma"  bats  on  Sable  Island,  could  have  been  displaced  by  weather 
from  southern  parts  of  the  species’  range. 

We  suggest  that  the  tendency  of  lasiurine  bats  to  move  northwards 
through  the  continent  during  spring  migration,  and  coastward  then 
southward  in  autumn  is  likely  based  on  temperature  and  food  availabil¬ 
ity.  During  autumn,  inland  areas  cool  more  rapidly  than  coastal  areas. 
Thus  bats  moving  towards  the  coast  would  be  moving  into  warmer 
areas  where  flying  insect  prey  is  available  later  into  the  season,  and 
also  where  milder  temperatures  may  reduce  energy  requirements  for 
normal  activities  such  as  arousal,  feeding,  and  seasonal  movements. 

In  Hoary  Bat  populations  there  is  some  segregation  of  sexes  during 
summer,  with  males  occurring  primarily  in  mountainous  regions  of 
western  North  America ,  and  females  in  eastern  areas ,  although  scattered 
records  of  male  Hoary  Bats  in  more  eastern  areas  during  summer  may 
be  young-of-the-year  (Cryan  2003,  Findley  &  Jones  1964)  and  some 
adult  males  may  also  occur  in  the  east.  Cryan  (2003)  suggests  that  the 
high  proportion  of  male  Red  Bat  records  in  northern  regions  during 
late  autumn  and  winter  indicates  that  males  may  not  migrate  as  far 
south  as  females.  This  is  consistent  with  the  Nova  Scotia  observations 
presented  here  in  which  males  predominate  in  all  3  species. 

Offshore  Occurrences 

Van  Gelder  and  Wingate  (1961)  note  a  consistent  correlation  between 
the  occurrences  of  waves  of  bats  and  waves  of  birds  in  Bermuda  dur¬ 
ing  the  fall  migration  season,  with  the  largest  influxes  from  September 
to  late  November.  They  suggested  that  both  bats  and  birds  are  strays 
wind-drifted  off  the  American  coast  while  migrating.  Hayman  (1959) 
notes  that  2  separate  Hoary  Bats  found  in  Iceland  in  October  may  also 
have  been  blown  off  course  by  a  storm  (suggested  by  the  occurrence 
of  storm-blown  North  American  birds  in  Iceland),  and  that  in  at  least 
1  case,  this  was  supported  by  weather  patterns.  Maunder  (1988)  notes 
that  migratory  lasiurine  bats  in  Atlantic  Canada  may  simply  be  fall 
wanderers ,  but  it  seems  more  likely  that  at  least  some  of  the  northeastern 
records,  especially  those  recorded  after  mid-September,  are  the  result 
of  “drift  migration”.  McLaren  (198 1)  suggests  that  “drift  migration"  is 


134 


LUCAS  AND  HEBDA 


responsible  for  unusual  autumn  records  of  birds  in  eastern  Canada  and 
the  New  England  States,  and  describes  “an  extraordinary  convergence 
of  air  masses  and  wind  streamlines”  in  the  Nova  Scotia  region  during 
both  spring  and  autumn  landbird  migrations.  He  also  notes  that  dur¬ 
ing  early  autumn  winds  from  the  mid- western  to  southeastern  USA, 
converge  on  Nova  Scotia  and  continue  on  out  to  sea.  McLaren  et  al. 
(2006)  examined  the  occurrence  of  avian  transatlantic  vagrants  from 
eastern  North  America  and  the  meteorological  systems  associated  with 
species  composition  and  distribution.  Their  analyses  supported  earlier 
suggestions  that  many  vagrant  North  American  landbirds  occurring  in 
Britain  and  Ireland  in  autumn  are  likely  displaced  downwind  across 
the  North  Atlantic  after  becoming  entrained  in  strong  southwest  winds 
in  warm  sectors  ahead  of  cold  fronts  along  the  eastern  seaboard  of 
North  America. 

Migratory  lasiurine  bats  found  in  offshore  areas  of  Nova  Scotia 
may  be  individuals  caught  up  in  the  same  weather  patterns.  Of  the  47 
lasiurine  bats  recorded  in  Nova  Scotia  during  August  through  Novem¬ 
ber,  24  occurred  along  the  mainland  coast  and  on  coastal  islands,  and 
16  occurred  on  vessels  and  at  Sable  Island.  The  latter  may  have  been 
individuals  displaced  beyond  what  is  likely  a  normal  coastal  migration 
route  along  the  Atlantic  coast  of  Nova  Scotia  and  northeastern  USA. 

Since  the  1970s,  there  have  been  occasional  sightings  of  bats  on 
Sable  Island.  The  first  confirmed  lasiurine  bat  record  for  the  island 
was  a  Red  Bat  from  1976.  Subsequently  several  live  individuals  were 
dislodged  from  piles  of  lumber  during  spring  maintenance  activities, 
and  some  were  seen  feeding  around  the  Station  buildings  during  late 
afternoon  or  dusk  in  autumn,  however  most  were  not  identified  (e.g., 
4  individuals  feeding  near  the  Station  after  dusk  between  October  30 
and  November  8, 2006).  No  additional  records  were  kept  until  autumn 
2002  when  a  Red  Bat  and  a  Silver-haired  Bat  were  photographed  at 
the  Sable  Station. 

During  autumn  2005,  there  was  an  increase  in  bat  sightings  follow¬ 
ing  Hurricane  Wilma.  This  coincided  with  the  appearance  of  large 
numbers  of  rare  or  extraseasonal  birds  in  the  wake  of  the  hurricane 
that  generated  a  great  deal  of  interest  in  Atlantic  Canada  (McLaren 
&  Mills  2006).  Species  sighted  on  the  mainland  and  on  Sable  Island 
included  Sterna  caspia  (Caspian  Tern),  S.  maxima  (Royal  Tern),  S. 
sandvicensis  (Sandwich  Tern)  and  SJorsteri  (Forster’s  Tern) ,  and  Coc- 
cyzus  americanus  (Yellow-billed  Cuckoo).  On  Sable,  as  in  mainland 


LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA 


135 


Nova  Scotia  and  Cape  Breton,  extralimital  or  extraseasonal  sightings 
of  birds  are  sometimes  attributed  to  the  high  winds  of  gales,  tropical 
storms  and  hurricanes,  although  McLaren  (1981)  notes  that  the  role 
of  weather  in  displacing  landbird  migrants  is  generally  through  geo- 
strophic  wind  patterns  rather  than  through  storms.  It  is  possible  that 
the  weather  systems  that  brought  the  many  southern  and/or  migratory 
birds  to  Sable  Island  in  autumn  2005  also  brought  the  lasiurine  bats. 
Thus  while  lasiurine  bats  found  along  the  coast  of  mainland  Nova 
Scotia  and  on  coastal  islands  would  be  within  a  normal  migratory  cor¬ 
ridor  for  these  species,  bats  on  Sable  Island,  and  sighted  well  offshore 
flying  or  resting  on  vessels,  are  likely  animals  displaced  by  weather, 
including  strong  offshore  winds .  This  may  be  an  important  factor  in  the 
much  lower  occurrence  of  Hoary  Bats  found  offshore.  Hoary  Bats  are 
more  than  twice  the  size  of  Silver-haired  Bats  and  Red  Bats,  and  thus 
probably  stronger  fliers,  less  prone  to  being  blown  offshore,  or  more 
likely  get  back  on  course  after  being  displaced.  However,  6  of  the  12 
individual  Silver-haired  Bats  were  found  on  Sable  Island.  They  are 
the  smallest  of  the  lasiurine  bat  species,  and  may  be  more  vulnerable 
displacement  by  strong  winds. 

CONCLUSIONS 

Although  no  comprehensive  surveys  for  lasiurine  bats  have  been 
conducted  in  Nova  Scotia,  extensive  echolocation  surveys  have  sug¬ 
gested  that  there  are  no  significant  populations  of  these  species  in  the 
Province .  While  the  records  considered  here  are  largely  from  incidental 
observations,  the  seasonality  of  these  records  suggests  that  most  oc¬ 
currences  of  these  species  in  Nova  Scotia  are  likely  not  extralimital. 
Instead  they  may  be  part  of  normal  migratory  movements  toward 
coastal  areas  and  then  southward  to  overwintering  areas.  The  lasiurine 
bats  involved  in  these  movements  may  comprise  animals  migrating 
coastward  from  other  regions  in  eastern  Canada  and/or  individuals 
from  small  breeding  populations  in  Nova  Scotia. 

Acknowledgements  We  thank  Gerry  Forbes  and  staff  of  the  Sable 
Island  Station,  Meteorological  Service  of  Canada;  Judith  Eger,  Royal 
Ontario  Museum;  Fred  Scott,  Acadia  University;  Sherman  Boates,Nova 
Scotia  Natural  Resources;  the  many  people  who  contributed  sightings 
details;  and  ExxonMobil  Canada,  Ltd.  Hugh  Broders,  Saint  Mary’s 


136 


LUCAS  AND  HEBDA 


University,  and  Ian  McLaren  reviewed  an  early  draft  of  the  manuscript 
and  provided  many  helpful  comments  and  insights. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Allen,  G.M.  (1939)  Bats.  Cambridge:  Harvard  University  Press. 

Banfield,  A.W.F.  (1974)  Mammals  of  Canada.  University  of  Toronto  Press, 
Toronto,  Canada. 

Bleakney,  J.S.  (1965)  Notes  on  the  migratory  tree  bats  of  Nova  Scotia. 
Canadian  Field-Naturalist  79:154-155. 

Broders,  H.G.,  Quinn,  G.M.  &  Forbes,  G  J.  (2003)  Species  status,  and  the 
spatial  and  temporal  patterns  of  activity  of  bats  in  southwest  Nova  Scotia, 
Canada.  Northeastern  Naturalist  10:383-398. 

Brown,  N.R.  (1953)  An  addition  to  the  list  of  mammals  of  Nova  Scotia:  the 
Eastern  Red  Bat.  Canadian  Field-Naturalist  67:139. 

Carter, T.D.  ( 1 950)  On  the  migration  of  the  red  bat,  Lasiurus  borealis  borealis. 
Journal  of  Mammalogy  31:349-350. 

Catling,  P.M.,  Freedman,  B.  &  Lucas,  Z.  (1984)  The  vegetation  and 
phytogeography  of  Sable  Island,  Nova  Scotia.  Proceedings  of  the  Nova 
Scotian  Institute  of  Science  34:181-247. 

Cryan,  P.M.  (2003)  Seasonal  distribution  of  migratory  tree  bats  (. Lasiurus 
and  Lasionycteris )  in  North  America.  Journal  of  Mammalogy  84:579-593. 

Fenton,  M.B.(  1983)  Just  Bats.  University  of  Toronto  Press,  Toronto,  Canada. 

Findley,  J.S.  &  Jones,  C.  (1964)  Seasonal  distribution  of  the  hoary  bat. 
Journal  of  Mammalogy  45:461-470. 

Garroway,C  J.  (2004)  Inter-  and  intraspecific  temporal  variation  in  the  activity 
of  bats  at  two  Nova  Scotia  hibernacula.  Thesis,  Saint  Mary’s  University, 
Halifax,  Nova  Scotia. 

Gilpin,  J.B.  (1867)  On  the  mammalia  of  Nova  Scotia.  Transactions  of  the 
Nova-Scotian  Institute  of  Natural  Science  1:8-15. 

Griffin,  D.R.  (1940)  Migrations  of  New  England  bats.  Bulletin:  Museum  of 
Comparative  Zoology  76:217-246. 

Hall,  E.R.  (1981)  The  Mammals  of  North  America.  Vol.l.  John  Wiley  & 
Sons,  New  York. 

Hayman,  R.W.  (1959)  American  bats  reported  in  Iceland.  Journal  of 
Mammalogy  40:245-246. 

Hitchcock,  H.B.  (1943)  Hoary  bat,  Lasiurus  cinereus ,  at  Southhampton 
Island,  N.W.T.  Canadian  Field-Naturalist  57:86. 

Mackiewicz,  J.  &  Backus,  R.H.  (1956)  Oceanic  records  of  Lasionycteris 
noctivagans  and  Lasiurus  borealis.  Journal  of  Mammalogy  37:442-443. 

Maunder,  J.E.  ( 1 988)  First  Newfoundland  record  of  the  Hoary  Bat  .Lasiurus 
cinereus,  with  a  discussion  of  other  records  of  migratory  tree  bats  in  Atlantic 
Canada.  Canadian  Field-Naturalist  102:726-728. 

McLaren,  I.A.  (1981)  The  incidence  of  vagrant  landbirds  on  Nova  Scotian 
Islands.  Auk  98:243-257. 


LASIURINE  BATS  IN  NOVA  SCOTIA 


137 


McLaren,  I.A.&  Mills,  E.  (2006)  Weather  andbirds:  aReview  of  aremarkable 
season.  Nova  Scotia  Birds  48:8-9. 

McLaren,  I.A.,  Lees,  A.C.,  Field,  C.  &  Collins,  K.J.  (2006)  Origins  and 
characteristics  of  Nearctic  landbirds  in  Britain  and  Ireland  in  autumn:  a 
statistical  analysis.  Ibis  148:707-726. 

Miller,  G.S.  (1897)  Migration  of  bats  on  Cape  Cod,  Massachusetts.  Science 
5:541-543. 

Moseley,  M.  (2007a)  Acadian  biospeleology  Composition  and  ecology  of  cave 
fauna  of  Nova  Scotia  and  southern  New  Brunswick,  Canada.  International 
Journal  of  Speleology  36:1-21. 

Moseley,  M.  (2007b)  Records  of  bats  (Chiroptera)  at  caves  and  mines  in  Nova 
Scotia .  Nova  Scotia  Museum .  Curatorial  Report;  no .  9 ,  Halifax ,  Nova  Scotia. 

Norton,  A.H.  (1930)  A  red  bat  at  sea.  Journal  of  Mammalogy  11:225-226. 

Nowak, R.M.  ( 1 994)  Walker’s  Bats  of  the  World.  The  Johns  Hopkins  University 
Press,  Baltimore  and  London. 

Peterson,  R.L.  (1970)  Another  red  bat,  Lasiurus  borealis,  taken  aboard  ship 
off  the  coast  of  Nova  Scotia.  Canadian  Field  Naturalist  84:401 . 

Peterson,  R.L.  (1966)  The  Mammals  of  Eastern  Canada.  Toronto,  Oxford 
University  Press. 

Rockwell,  L.  (2005)  Summer  distribution  of  bat  species  on  mainland  Nova 
Scotia.  Unpublished  thesis,  Saint  Mary’s  University,  Halifax,  Nova  Scotia. 

Scott,  F.W.  &  Hebda  AJ  (2004)  Annotated  list  of  the  mammals  of  Nova 
Scotia.  Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  42:189-208. 

Thomas,  0. 1921 .  Bats  on  migration.  Journal  of  Mammalogy  2:167. 

Tuttle,  M.D.  (1995)  The  Little-known  World  of  Hoary  Bats.  Bats  13:3-6. 

Van  Gelder  RG,  &  Wingate,  DB  (1961)  The  taxonomy  and  status  of  bats  in 
Bermuda.  American  Museum  Novitates  2029: 1-9. 

Van  Zyll  de  Jong,  C.G.  (1985)  Handbook  of  Canadian  Mammals,  vol.  2: 
Bats.  National  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  National  Museums  of  Canada, 
Ottawa,  Canada,  pp.  128-145. 


- 


Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  (2011) 
Volume  46,  Part  2,  pp.  139-147 


CAN  WE  STOP  THE  ATLANTIC 
LOBSTER  FISHERY  GOING  THE  WAY  OF 
NEWFOUNDLAND’S  ATLANTIC  COD? 

A  PERSPECTIVE 

CHRISTOPHER  J.  CORKETT 

Biology  Department,  Dalhousie  University,  Halifax,  Nova  Scotia,  B3H4R2 
Current  address:  76  Prestwick  Close,  Apt.  214, 

Halifax,  Nova  Scotia,  B3S  1S2 


ABSTRACT 

The  cod  and  lobster  fisheries  of  Atlantic  Canada  are  managed  in  very 
different  ways.  Regulatory  policy  for  Atlantic  cod  has  traditionally  been 
based  on  population  or  biomass  measurements,  something  that  has  never 
been  done  for  the  management  of  Atlantic  Canada's  lobster.  While  these 
traditional  methods  differ,  an  alternate  logical  or  analytic  approach  to 
management  is  perhaps  one  way  that  sound  and  rational  fisheries  can  be 
managed.  The  recommendations  that  follow  derive  from  asking:  can  we 
learn  analytic  lessons  from  the  collapse  of  Atlantic  cod  that  might  allow  us 
to  avoid  a  similar  collapse  in  Atlantic  lobster?  A  landings-per-unit-of-effort 
(LPUE)  index  could  be  constructed  for  the  lobster  industry  that  would 
provide  a  continuous  trend  over  time.  This  trend  would  form  an  effective 
feedback  model;  a  declining  trend  over  time  would  indicate  the  goal  of 
sustainability  was  in  jeopardy,  whereas  a  level  or  increasing  trend  over 
time  would  indicate  that  the  industry  was  maintaining  its  sustainability. 
Crucially,  an  LPUE  index  should  only  be  used  as  an  argument  a  posteriori 
involving  feedback  in  the  form  of  trends.  This  index  should  never  be  used 
as  an  argument  a  priori  to  estimate  lobster  abundance  or  lobster  biomass. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  Newfoundland  fishery  for  Atlantic  cod  ( Gadus  rnorhua  Lin¬ 
naeus  1758)  was  once  the  largest  and  most  productive  cod  fishery  in 
the  world  (McGrath,  1911;  Thompson,  1943).  In  the  early  1990s,  this 
fishery  suffered  a  major  collapse  that  has  become  one  of  the  world’s 
most  prominent  case  studies  of  failure  in  fisheries  management  (Charles, 
1997).  This  paper  attempts  to  answer  the  question:  can  we  learn  les¬ 
sons  from  the  collapse  of  Newfoundland's  Atlantic  cod  that  can  be 
used  to  avoid  a  similar  collapse  in  Atlantic  Canada  s  lobster  ( Homarus 
cunericanus  H.  Milne-Edwards,  1837)  fishery  ?  Newfoundland  is  not 


140 


CORKETT 


the  only  jurisdiction  that  has  suffered  a  shortage  of  cod.  For  example, 
Britain  ten  years  ago  had  an  annual  demand  for  cod  of  170,000  metric 
tonnes  (MT),  well  above  the  British  fishing  fleet’s  EU  quota  for  North 
Sea  cod  which  in  2002  was  just  under  34,000  MT.  By  contrast,  over 
the  same  period  Iceland  and  Norway  both  had  cod  fisheries  that  were 
in  excellent  condition  with  ‘fishing  quotas  of  both  countries  fluctuat¬ 
ing  only  slightly  from  year  to  year,  around  an  average  of  190,000 
MT’(Globefish,  2003). 

Can  we  learn  lessons  from  Iceland’s  successful  management  of  it’s 
cod  fishery,  lessons  that  can  be  applied  to  Atlantic  Canada  s  lobster 
fishery?  Perhaps  if  we  make  a  comparative  study  of  successful  (Iceland 
and  Norway)  and  unsuccessful  (Canada  and  Britain)  cod  fisheries,  we 
might  gain  some  insight  as  to  how  lobster  fisheries  could  be  better 
managed?  This  would  doubtless  be  of  interest  but  it  is  not  the  approach 
taken  in  this  discussion  paper.  Here,  I  do  not  look  for  factual  answers 
based  on  a  comparative  analysis;  rather,  I  look  for  analytic  answers 
based  on  a  logical  analysis.  Analytic  answers  are  of  particular  interest 
since  they  apply  to  the  sound  and  rational  management  of  fisheries 
world-wide.  Similar  analytic  methods  could  be  used  for  management 
of  Canada’s,  Iceland’s,  Britain’s  and  Norway’s  cod  fisheries  and  for 
the  Atlantic  Canada  lobster  fishery. 

1.  Traditional  differences  between  the  management  of  cod  and 
lobster 

The  applied  science  of  managing  Atlantic  Canada’s  ground  fish 
stocks  has  traditionally  involved  the  use  of  catch  limits  based  on 
population  abundance,  often  in  the  form  of  biomass  measurements. 
Biomass  measurements,  however,  have  never  been  part  of  Atlantic 
Canada’s  lobster  management  plans.  Perhaps  it  is  just  because  these 
plans  have  not  involved  biomass  based  advice  such  as:  ‘The  maximum 
sustainable  yield  (MS  Y)  of  lobster  in  LFA  33  is  2  thousand  MT’ ,  that 
lobster  stocks  have  not  yet  ‘gone  the  way  of  the  cod’.  To  understand 
why  biomass  based  advice  has  been  so  devastating  for  ground  fish 
stocks,  we  need  to  understand  why  a  decision  cannot  be  derived  solely 
from  facts  or  data.  Nobody  knows  how  many  lobsters  are  on  the  sea 
bottom  but,  even  if  that  were  known,  a  management  decision  should 
not  be  obtained  from  this  information.  Decisions  still  have  to  be  taken. 
A  failure  to  understand  this  fact  would  mean  that  the  mistakes  made 
with  the  management  ot  the  Newfoundland  cod  would  be  repeated  in 
the  management  of  Atlantic  lobster. 


ATLANTIC  LOBSTER  FISHERY 


141 


2.  How  are  management  decisions  to  be  based  on  scientific  fact? 

Regulatory  management  policies  for  a  fishery  are  made  by  a  col¬ 
lection  of  people  -  the  decision  makers.  In  the  management  of  an  At¬ 
lantic  lobster  fishery,  these  decision  makers  are  members  of  a  Lobster 
Advisory  Committee  together  with  the  Regional  Director  General  of 
Canada’s  Department  of  Fisheries  and  Oceans  (DFO).  No  one  claims 
that  laws  enacted  by  the  decision  makers  of  a  parliament  are  derived 
from  data;  why  should  the  policies  for  fisheries  management  be  any 
different?  That  is  not  to  say  that  scientific  advice  based  on  scientific 
fact  is  not  one  of  the  important  inputs  the  decision  makers  seek  in 
order  to  help  them  construct  the  policies  needed  to  manage  a  fishery. 
But  the  connection  between  decision  and  fact  must  be  a  sound  one.  An 
example  of  the  sound  managerial  use  of  scientific  fact  is  to  be  found 
in  the  logical  analysis  of  engineering. 

The  engineer  makes  decisions  all  the  time  and  this  is  done  by  trial 
and  error;  that  is,  a  decision  is  taken  (trial)  and  factual  feedback  is  ob¬ 
tained  by  ‘seeing  what  happens’  (error  elimination).  We  can  represent 
a  fishery  version  of  this  engineering  decision  making  by  the  analytic 
problem  solving  schemata  provided  by  the  philosopher  of  science, 
Karl  Popper  (1979),  as: 

Pj  -*TD-*  EE  TD— ►  EE  ...etc.  (1) 

where  P  =  the  initial  problems  including  the  goal  to  be  pursued  (How 
do  we  obtain  a  sustainable  fishery?  How  do  we  obtain  further  employ¬ 
ment  for  our  fish  processors?);  TD  =  tentative  decision,  a  tentative 
policy  that  reflects  the  chosen  goal;  EE  =  error  elimination,  objective 
feedback  by  which  the  effectiveness  of  the  policy  is  assessed;  and  P2 
=  the  new  problems  and  consequences  that  arise  as  the  result  of  the 
decision  taken. 

3.  How  are  management  decisions  to  be  guided  by  universal 
laws? 

Under  an  analytic  or  logical  view  of  the  scientific  enterprise ,  the  laws , 
models,  or  theories  of  fisheries  science  apply  world-wide  and  involve 
a  falsifiable  view  of  science  (Corkett,  2009).  A  neoclassical  view  of 
bioeconomics  meets  this  logical  requirement.  Rights-based  models, 
for  example,  do  not  describe  an  actual  world  occupied  by  fallible 
people  such  as  you  and  me,  but  describe  a  situation  logic  animated  by 


142 


CORKETT 


‘agents’  or  ‘actors’ ,  players  whose  rationality  gives  the  model  its  great 
flexibility.  It  is  this  flexibility  or  simplicity  that  allows  a  nghts-based 
model  to  explain  the  prejudicial  nature  of  derby  fishing  -  the  rush  for 
the  fish.  Just  as  the  laws  of  physics  apply  universally  (i.e.  apply  world¬ 
wide)  and  set  limits  on  what  can  be  accomplished  by  the  engineer  (i.e. 
show  what  cannot  be  done),  the  logical  models  of  fisheries  economics 
give  negative  advice  that  universally  explains  (in  this  case,  explains 
for  both  cod  and  lobster  harvesting)  what  cannot  be  accomplished  by 
regulatory  policy.  For  example: 

One  cannot  obtain  a  sustainable  cod  and  lobster  fishery  (goal) 
while  at  the  same  time  providing  unlimited  jobs  for  cod  and  lobster 
fishermen  (social  objective). 

One  cannot  obtain  unlimited  jobs  for  cod  and  lobster  fishermen 
(goal)  without  using  tax  payer’s  money  (concomitant  effect). 

One  cannot  obtain  a  sustainable  cod  and  lobster  fishery  (goal) 
without  controlling  the  prejudicial  behavior  of  cod  and  lobster 
fishing  derbies  (unintended  consequence). 

One  cannot  control  cod  and  lobster  fishing  derbies  (goal)  without 
assigning  property  rights  (for  example,  by  the  use  of  Individual 
Transferable  Quotas  [ITQs]). 

The  point  is  not  that  these  examples  are  necessarily  true  or  particu¬ 
larly  good,  and  I  am  certainly  not  advocating  the  adoption  of  ITQs  for 
the  lobster  fishery.  The  important  point  is  that  the  examples  illustrate 
how,  as  in  the  physical  sciences,  universal  advice  in  the  social  sciences 
takes  the  analytic  form  of  a  politically  neutral  negative  argument:  If 
you  choose  to  accept  goal  or  objective  A,  you  cannot  at  the  same  time 
achieve  goal  or  objective  B. 

If  you  wish  to  achieve  goal  A,  you  have  to  control  unintended  con¬ 
sequence  B;  or  you  cannot  achieve  goal  A  without  also  controlling 
concomitant  effect  B . 

From  a  logical  point  of  view,  a  fisheries  economic  tradition  (such  as 
the  use  of  ITQs  in  managing  Iceland’s  cod  fishery)  involves  negative 
apolitical  advice,  advice  that  explains  what  you  should  not  do.  Limi¬ 
tations  on  and  the  potential  consequences  of  options  are  presented  to 


ATLANTIC  LOBSTER  FISHERY 


143 


the  decision  makers  by  fishery  economists,  but  the  decisions  are  not 
derived  from  the  science.  The  decisions  and  the  responsibility  that 
goes  with  these  decisions  remain  entirely  in  the  hands  of  the  decision 
makers. 

4.  Rational  management  of  a  lobster  fishery 

Decisions  for  the  rational  and  sound  management  of  any  lobster 
fishery  require  the  institutional  and  structural  support  of  a  dual  mod¬ 
eled  system,  comprised  of  two  parts: 

(i)  a  universal  model  of  fishery  economics  that  provides  an  under¬ 
standing  of  the  prejudicial  nature  of  derby  fishing  (see  section  3). 
This  model  is  applicable  to  all  fisheries  (thus  applying  to  both  cod 
and  lobster)  and  provides  politically  neutral,  negative  scientific 
advice  of  the  form:  ‘You  cannot  have  a  sustainable  cod  or  lobster 
fishery  (goal)  unless  you  control  fishing  effort  and  overcapacity 
(concomitant  effects)’. 

(ii)  a  feedback  model  of  the  lobster  fishery  in  question  that  informs 
us  of  the  effectiveness  of  the  regulatory  policies  put  in  place  by 
the  decision  makers  (see  section  2).  Feedback  is  used  to  assess 
the  effectiveness  of  the  chosen  policy  in  meeting  the  goal  of  a 
sustainable  fishery.  The  feedback  model  applies  only  to  the  lobster 
fishery  in  question  (i.e.  it  is  not  universal). 

5.  Where  does  biomass  modeling  go  so  wrong? 

The  scientists  at  Canada’s  DFO  sometimes  complain  that  the  politi¬ 
cians  do  not  listen  to  their  advice,  and  indeed  there  is  some  truth  to 
this.  But  from  a  logical  point  of  view,  it  is  not  at  all  surprising  that 
DFO  advice  is  not  necessarily  adhered  to;  since  this  advice  itself  is 
not  politically  neutral,  there  is  no  reason  why  other  policy  or  political 
considerations  should  not  override  it.  Why  should  the  decision  makers 
not  strive  to  reduce  unemployment  (goal)  by  favoring  a  total  allow¬ 
able  catch  (TAC)  of,  say,  30  million  MT  instead  of  20  million  MT? 
Or  why  should  they  not  strive  to  raise  the  standard  of  decision  making 
by  applying  the  precautionary  principle  and  setting  a  TAC  of,  say,  10 
million  MT  or  should  it  be  5  million  MT? 

Unlike  the  feedback  model  (1 ,  above)  where  the  empirical  evidence 
provides  feedback  after  the  decision  has  been  taken  (a  type  of  argument 
referred  to  as  a  posteriori ),  DFO  fisheries  scientists  collect  data  that 


144 


CORKETT 


is  used  to  form  biomass  models,  that  in  turn  provide  advice  for  the 
decision  to  be  taken  (a  type  of  argument  referred  to  as  ci  priori) ,  as. 

database  — ►  biomass  model  —►  prediction  —►  decision  (2) 

Clearly,  if  there  are  uncertainties  in  data  quality  and  quantity,  the 
scientific  advice  will  be  uncertain  -  a  situation  sometimes  crudely 
summarized  as:  ‘Garbage  in:  garbage  out’.  The  prediction  or  advice 
derived  from  schema  (2)  above  deploys  an  argument  a  priori  and 
is  referred  to  as  political  advice  since,  unlike  economic  advice  (see 
section  3),  it  is  not  neutral  in  policy  terms.  It  describes  a  political  or 
policy  decision  to  be  taken.  For  example:  ‘The  TAC  should  be  20 
MT  or  ‘The  MSY  is  30  million  MT\  The  reason  why  an  a  priori 
argument  is  so  damaging  is  that  it  sets  the  emphasis  in  decision  mak¬ 
ing  in  entirely  the  wrong  direction.  Instead  of  understanding  that  all 
decisions  have  to  be  taken,  we  are  now  led  to  believe  that  decisions 
can  be  reduced  to  facts.  Better  decisions  require  better  facts;  find 
the  ‘better  facts’  and  we  have  the  ‘better  decisions’.  Instead,  it  is  a 
matter  of  elementary  logic  that  decisions  together  with  goals  (such 
as  sustainability)  and  standards  (such  as  the  precautionary  principle) 
cannot  be  produced  from,  or  be  reduced  to,  facts  or  data.  Decisions, 
goals  and  standards  reflect  the  values  of  the  proponents  and  form  part 
of  the  problem  situation  requiring  solution  (Pp  P  ...  in  [1]  of  section 
2).  Solutions  require  ingenious  and  creative  policies,  not  accurate  or 
‘certain’  measurements  of  biomass!  From  an  ethical  perspective,  the 
hope  of  the  fisheries  scientist  that  the  establishment  of  norms  such  as 
sustainability  can  be  based  on  an  a  priori  argument  results  in  a  monism 
of  scientific  ethics  (Corkett,  2005).  An  example  of  a  fisheries  monism 
would  be  the  widespread  use  of  reference  points  in  a  naive  attempt 
to  guide  the  development  of  a  sustainable  fishery  (Beddington  et  al ., 
2007,  their  figure  1). 

CONCLUDING  COMMENTS 

The  management  decisions  of  Atlantic  Canada’s  commercial  ground 
fisheries  have  been  based  on  predictions  derived  from  data-based 
models  that  combine  within  themselves  the  features  of  the  dual  model 
system  advocated  in  section  4  (above).  Unlike  this  dual  system,  the 
data-based  models  used  by  Canada’s  DFO  (i)  are  derived  from  data 


ATLANTIC  LOBSTER  FISHERY 


145 


and  so  are  not  universal  (they  cannot  possibly  apply  to  both  cod  and 
lobster);  (ii)  are  models  of  fish  populations  and  not  fishing  behavior  and 
so  provide  no  understanding  of  the  prejudicial  nature  of  derby  fishing; 
and  (iii)  advise  the  decision  makers  what  to  do  by  describing  a  policy 
to  be  adopted,  rather  than  by  taking  a  politically  neutral  position  that 
sets  limits  to  what  can  be  done. 

The  ITQs  were  introduced  into  Iceland’s  cod  fishery  in  1984  (Ein- 
arsson,  2001).  It  is  very  easy  to  find  objections  to  the  ITQ  system.  For 
example,  detractors  point  out  that  the  smaller  fishing  boats  are  bought 
out,  resulting  in  the  larger  boat  owners  and  processors  owning  much 
of  the  available  quota.  If  the  goal  is  to  maintain  high  employment 
for  fishermen  and  processors,  then  one  should  never  even  consider 
introducing  a  management  system  involving  quota  ownership.  If  the 
goal,  however,  is  to  establish  and  maintain  a  sustainable  fishery,  the 
wisdom  of  involving  market  forces  in  both  reducing  and  controlling 
overcapacity  will  be  appreciated.  The  supporters  of  the  ITQ  system 
point  out  that,  under  this  system  of  economic  benefit,  vessel  owners 
have  an  incentive  to  buy  out  one  another,  a  form  of  fleet  downsizing 
that, contrary  to  the  usual  practice, reduces  fishing  overcapacity  without 
involving  government  money.  Iceland’s  successful  management  of 
its  cod  fishery,  using  rights-based  models  in  the  form  of  ITQs,  is  an 
example  of  a  management  tradition  and  regime  that  has  effectively 
controlled  its  effort  levels  and  overcapacity.  It  will  come  as  no  surprise 
that  similarly,  a  sustainable  lobster  fishery  has  to  contain  its  effort  and 
fishing  capacity  as  advocated  in  the  universal  scientific  advice  of  section 
4  (i),  as:  ‘One  cannot  have  a  sustainable  cod  or  lobster  fishery  (goal) 
unless  you  control  fishing  effort  and  overcapacity  (concomitant  effects)  ’ . 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

Our  ability  to  maintain  a  sustainable  lobster  fishery  into  the  distant 
future  depends  on  learning  from  those  mistakes  of  method  that  have 
allowed  the  development  of  a  gross  overcapacity  in  our  cod  fisheries 
(Charles  1997).  The  basic  mistake  in  managing  Atlantic  groundfish 
has  been  the  use  of  biomass  based  advice  to  tell  the  decision  makers 
which  policy  should  be  adopted  (see  [21  section  5),  rather  than  using  a 
feedback  model  to  assess  if  the  policy  decided  upon  has  in  fact  enabled 
the  fishery  to  meet  the  stated  goal  being  pursued  (see  [1]  section  2). 


146 


CORKETT 


Lobster  management  has  a  long  history  of  effort  control;  in  Canada, 
some  regulatory  measures,  such  as  fishing  seasons  and  size  limits,  have 
been  in  place  for  more  than  eighty  years  (FRCC,  2007).  The  health 
of  this  industry  has  been  monitored  traditionally  through  the  use  of 
landings.  This  method,  however,  needs  structural  improvement  in  the 
form  of  a  more  effective  feedback  model  (see  section  2).  For  example, 
beginning  in  the  mid-1970s,  annual  landings  in  the  Atlantic  region 
underwent  a  sustained  increase  from  about  15,000  MT  to  a  peak  of 
48,000  MT  in  1991  (FRCC,  2007).  Did  the  increased  landings  indi¬ 
cate  increases  in  lobster  abundance  or  was  it  a  reflection  of  increased 
effort  levels  or  was  it  a  bit  of  both?  Only  a  LPUE  index  (also  called 
a  catch-per-unit-of-effort  [CPUE])  can  answer  this  kind  of  question. 

A  LPUE  index  should  be  constructed  for  the  lobster  industry,  hence 
providing  a  continuous  trend  over  time.  This  trend  would  form  an  ef¬ 
fective  feedback  model;  a  declining  trend  over  time  would  indicate  the 
goal  of  sustainability  was  in  jeopardy,  whereas  a  level  or  increasing 
trend  over  time  would  indicate  that  the  industry  was  maintaining  its 
sustainability. 

More  importantly,  if  it  is  determined  that  new  regulatory  policies 
are  required  to  reduce  effort  levels  and  avoid  overcapacity,  a  failure 
of  the  LPUE  index  to  increase  over  time  would  indicate  that  the  regu¬ 
lations  were  not  effective;  additional  and  more  effective  regulations 
would  be  needed. 

Crucially,  a  LPUE  index  is  only  to  be  used  as  an  argument  a  pos¬ 
teriori  involving  feedback  in  the  form  of  trends.  This  index  should 
never  be  used  as  an  argument  a  priori  to  estimate  lobster  abundance  or 
lobster  biomass.  Every  care  must  be  taken  not  to  repeat  the  mistakes 
made  by  Canada’s  DFO  in  managing  the  stocks  of  Atlantic  groundfish, 
methodological  mistakes  that  many  hold  responsible  for  the  collapse 
of  the  Newfoundland  Atlantic  cod  stock  by  the  1990’s,  with  its  severe 
economic,  ecological  and  social  impacts. 

Acknowledgements  This  article  has  benefited  from  critical  com¬ 
ments  provided  by  Stephen  R.  C.  Jones,  and  two  unnamed  referees. 


ATLANTIC  LOBSTER  FISHERY 


147 


REFERENCES 

Beddington,  J.R.,Agnew,  DJ.,  and  Clark,  C.W.  (2007).  Current  problems 
in  the  management  of  marine  fisheries.  Science  316:  1713-1716. 

Charles,  A.T.  (1997).  Fisheries  management  in  Atlantic  Canada.  Ocean  and 
Coastal  Management  35:101-119. 

Corkett,  C  J.  (2005).  The  Pew  report  on  US  fishery  councils:  a  critique  from 
the  open  society.  Marine  Policy  29:  247-253. 

Corkett,  CJ.  (2009).  Karl  Popper’s  definition  of  science.  Fisheries  Research 
96:  323. 

Einarsson,  G.  (2001).  Iceland  and  the  controversial  ITQ  system.  World 
Fishing  20(7):  16-19. 

Fisheries  Resource  and  Conservation  Council.  (2007).  Sustainability 
framework  for  Atlantic  lobster.  FRCC.  07,  R.l ,  July  2007. 

Globefish  Market  Reports.  (2003).  Cod-December,  2003.  Accessed  2006. 
http://www.globefish.org/index  .php?id=2030 

McGrath,  P.T.  (1911).  Newfoundland  in  1911.  Whitehead,  Morris,  and 
Company,  London. 

Popper,  K.  (1979).  Epistemology  without  a  knowing  subject.  In:  Objective 
Knowledge,  Clarendon  Press,  Oxford,  pp.  106-152. 

Thompson,  H.  (1943).  A  biological  and  economic  study  of  cod  ( Gadus 
callarias,  L.).  Department  of  Natural  Resources,  Research  Bulletin  14.  St 
John’s:  Government  of  Newfoundland  and  Labrador. 


. 


' 


> 


I  HI 

" fij  ^ 


Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  (2011) 

Volume  46,  Part  2,  pp.  149-174 

LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM 
NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA:  RESPONSES  TO 
A  MILD  FALL  AND  WINTER* 

David  J.  Garbary,  Jonathan  Ferrier,  Barry  R.  Taylor 

Department  of  Biology,  St.  Francis  Xavier  University, 
Antigonish,  Nova  Scotia,  Canada,  B2G  2W5 


ABSTRACT 

Over  1400  flowering  records  of  135  species  were  recorded  from  over  125 
visits  to  more  than  20  sites  in  Antigonish  County ,  Nova  Scotia  from  November 
2005  to  January  2006,  when  the  growing  season  is  normally  over.  The  species 
identified  were  primarily  herbaceous  dicots;  however,  there  were  four  species 
of  woody  plants  ( Cornus  sericea,  Spiraea  latifolia,  Symphoricarpos  albus 
and  Salix  sp.)  and  one  monocot  (. Allium  schoenoprasum) .  The  number  of 
species  flowering  declined  linearly  as  fall  progressed,  as  did  the  amount 
of  flowering  for  each  species.  Nevertheless,  over  40  species  were  still  in 
flower  in  early  December,  and  over  20  species  flowered  in  January.  The 
final  flowering  date  was  21  January,  when  ten  species  were  found.  This 
work  builds  on  a  previous  study  in  200 1 ,  when  93  species  were  recorded 
in  flower  during  November-December.  In  addition  to  the  30%  increase  in 
recorded  species  in  2005,  almost  50%  of  the  species  found  in  2005  were 
not  recorded  in  2001.  This  study  provides  an  expanded  baseline  against 
which  changes  in  flowering  phenology  can  be  evaluated  with  respect  to 
subsequent  regional  climate  change. 

Key  Words;  Antigonish,  flowering,  Nova  Scotia, phenology,  climate  change 

And  through  this  distemper ature  we  see  the  seasons  alter: 

hoary-headed  frosts  fall  in  the  fresh  lap  of  the  crimson  rose. 

-  A  Midsummer  Night’s  Dream,  W.  Shakespeare 


INTRODUCTION 

There  is  a  general  consensus  that  climate  warming  has  occurred  on 
a  global  scale,  and  that  mean  air  temperature  has  increased  0.5-0.6°C 
during  the  twentieth  century  (e.g.,  Houghton  et  al.  2001 ,  Menzel  et  al. 
2005,  McCarty  2001 ,  Schlelp  et  al.  2009,  Walther  et  al.  1995a,b,c).  In 


*Dedicated  to  the  memory  of  Sam  Vander  Kloet 

Corresponding  author:  dgarbary@gmail.com.  Tel:  902  867-2164,  Fax:  902  867-2389 


150 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


many  parts  of  the  world  the  impact  or  fingerprint  of  global  warm¬ 
ing  has  been  recorded  in  diverse  biological  systems  (IPPC  2007,  see 
Core  Writing  Team  et  al.  2007).  These  biological  responses  include 
the  timing  of  bird  and  insect  migrations,  amphibian  breeding,  and 
various  phenomena  associated  with  plant  phenology,  e.g.,  changes 
in  timing  of  leaf  bud  burst  or  leaf  colour  or  the  timing  of  flowering 
(Hughes  2000,  Parmesan  2007,  Root  et  al.  2003,  Walther  2002, 2004, 
Walther  et  al.  2001 , 2005a). 

Changes  in  colonization  patterns  along  environmental  gradients  have 
been  a  useful  fingerprint  of  climate  change  (e.g.  Walther  et  al.  2005b). 
Changes  in  the  timing  of  flowering ,  especially  earlier  spring  flowering , 
have  also  been  a  key  indicator  (e.g.,  Abu-Asab  et  al.  2001,  Fitter  & 
Fitter  2002,  Gu  et  al.  2008,  Houle  2007,  Miller-Rushing  &  Primack 
2008 ,  Thorhallsdottir  1998) .  Menzel  (2002)  argues  that  aspects  of  plant 
phenology  are  important  biological  indicators  of  climate  change  and 
form  an  excellent  proxy  for  temperature. 

Published  studies  take  several  approaches  to  examining  phenological 
responses  to  climate.  Most  studies  are  observational  and  look  for  cor¬ 
related  changes  in  plant  and  animal  behaviour  with  changing  environ¬ 
ment  (e.g.,  Menzel  &  Fabian  1999);  relatively  fewer  are  experimental 
and  manipulate  climate  in  the  field  to  examine  responses  of  individual 
species  (e.g.,  Dunne  et  al.  2003,  Post  et  al.  2008).  Some  studies  use 
remote  sensing  of  vegetation  to  quantify  phenological  changes  as  a 
result  of  climate  forcing  (Badeck  et  al.  2005,  White  et  al.  2005). 

Although  prolongation  of  the  growing  season  in  the  fall  has  been 
reported,  this  extension  is  considered  much  less  significant  than  early 
spring  growth  and  flowering  (Hovenden  et  al.  2008,  Menzel  2003, 
Menzel  &  Fabian  1999,  Menzel  et  al.  2001 ,  Walther  2002,  Thakur  et 
al.  2008).  The  emphasis  on  the  spring  arises  primarily  because  climate 
change  is  thought  to  have  its  greatest  impact  on  winter  and  spring 
temperatures,  and  because  fall  responses  reflect  factors  in  addition  to 
temperature  to  a  greater  extent  than  do  spring  responses  (Sparks  & 
Menzel  2002;  Walther  2003).  In  addition,  Schaber  &  Badeck  (2005) 
and  Menzel  (2003)  report  little  or  no  change  in  the  timing  of  fall  leaf 
colouration,  while  the  growing  season  was  extended  by  10  days  as  a 
consequence  ol  earlier  springs.  In  Europe  and  North  America,  climate 
warming  in  the  late  twentieth  century  has  advanced  spring  phenology 
by  1 .2-3.8  days/decade,  whereas  changes  in  the  fall  are  on  the  order 
of  0.3-1 .6  days/decade  (Menzel  2002,  Menzel  et  al.  2001). 


LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  151 


The  smaller  apparent  changes  in  fall  have  resulted  in  much  less 
research  emphasis  on  impacts  of  changing  climate  on  fall  events.  For 
species  with  indeterminate  flowering,  such  as  many  ruderal  annuals 
that  flower  until  they  are  killed  by  frost,  an  extension  of  the  flowering 
season  in  fall  could  lead  to  important  increases  in  reproductive  suc¬ 
cess,  if  pollinating  insects  are  still  active  or  species  are  self  pollinating. 
Extensions  of  the  fall  growing  season  may  be  particularly  important  in 
the  Canadian  Maritime  Provinces,  where  extended  warm  periods  may 
follow  intermittent  frosts.  Post  et  al.  (2008)  argue  that  changes  in  the 
entire  life  history  of  species  in  response  to  climate  change,  including 
reproduction,  should  be  examined  in  an  integrative  way.  Consequently, 
there  is  a  need  for  more  empirical  data  on  fall  phenomena  associated 
with  plant  phenology  and  how  this  might  be  affected  by  climate  change . 

There  is  no  long-term  database  of  systematically  collected  observa¬ 
tions  on  fall  flowering  in  Nova  Scotia.  There  is,  however,  an  excellent 
provincial  flora  (Roland  &  Smith  1969,  revised  by  Zinck  1998)  with 
generalized  accounts  of  flowering  times  for  each  species,  largely  based 
on  observations  during  the  1940s  to  the  1960s.  In  addition,  there  are 
extensive  herbarium  holdings  at  Acadia  University  (ACAD),  Nova 
Scotia  Museum  (NSPM),  Nova  Scotia  Agricultural  College  (NS  AC) 
and  St.  Francis  Xavier  University  (STFX)  that  reflect  both  historical 
and  more  recent  collections.  Despite  their  limitations,  regional  her¬ 
baria  provide  a  useful  background  against  which  changes  in  flowering 
phenology  can  be  evaluated  (e.g.,  Favoie  &  Lachance  2006,  Miller- 
Rushing  et  al.  2006). 

During  the  course  of  a  particularly  warm  fall  in  2001 ,  robust  flow¬ 
ering  was  apparent  in  the  local  flora  at  the  beginning  of  November. 
The  identity  and  persistence  of  plants  in  flower  were  recorded  at  a 
number  of  local  sites  to  the  end  of  flowering  in  mid-December  (Tay¬ 
lor  &  Garbary  2003).  These  observations  provided  the  latest  reported 
flowering  times  in  Nova  Scotia  for  virtually  all  the  species  identified, 
and  extended  the  limit  of  flowering  by  an  average  of  45  days.  The  fall 
of  2005  was  another  exceptionally  warm  season,  highlighted  by  the 
absence  of  frost  during  September  and  October  and  conspicuously 
robust  flowering  of  wild  plants.  A  second  survey  of  late-fall  flowering 
times  in  Antigonish  County,  from  November  2005  to  January  2006, 
was  therefore  undertaken  to  compare  against  the  2001  survey.  Specifi¬ 
cally,  our  objectives  were  (1)  to  compare  late  flowering  phenology  in 
2005  with  those  reported  in  the  flora  of  Nova  Scotia  (Roland  1998) 
and  herbarium  records  in  the  largest  provincial  herbarium  (ACAD); 


152 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


(2)  to  compare  late-fall  flowering  in  200 1  and  2005  to  determine  if  the 
flowering  season  had  lengthened  or  the  flowering  species  had  changed 
over  the  four-year  period;  and  (3)  to  determine  whether  differences 
in  flowering  phenology  between  2001  and  2005  were  congruent  with 
evidence  of  local  climate  change  in  the  fall  since  the  1950s. 


MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

To  assess  the  prevalence  of  late  fall  flowering,  21  sites  in  Antigonish 
County,  Nova  Scotia,  were  visited  two  or  more  times  at  approximately 
10-day  intervals  beginning  1  November  2005,  until  flowering  ceased 


Table  1  Primary  collecting  sites  in  Antigonish  Town  and  County  and  the  habitats 
examined  regularly  from  November  2005  to  January  2006.  Sites  visited  in 
at  least  two,  ten-day  periods. 


Site  name  and  coordinates 

Habitats 

Hawthorne  Street 
(45°37.5’N,  62°00.0’W) 

backyards,  old  field,  lawns,  garden  plots;  ~0.5  km  walk 

St.  Andrews  Street 
(45°37.0’N,  61°58.5’W) 

waste  ground  and  soil  banks  surrounding  building  lot 
with  unfinished  house  foundation;  100  m  walk 

Williams  Point 
(45°37.2’N,  61°57.5’W) 

waste  ground  and  streamside;  ditches  and  garden  plots 
along  3  km  drive 

Lower  West  River  Road 
(45°36.1’N,  62°00.2’W) 

ditches,  roadside  banks  and  fields  along  5  km  road 

South  Side  Harbour  Road 
(45°37.7’N,  61°53.8’W) 

ditches  and  roadside  fields  and  garden  plots  along 

10  km  drive 

Pomquet  Harbour 
(45°38.8’N,  61°50.1’W) 

fields,  ditches,  roadside,  salt  marsh;  5  km  drive  with 
several  stops 

Arisaig  Provincial  Park 
(45°45.3’N,  62°10.0’W) 

roadside,  ditches  and  regenerating  boreal  forest; 

0.25  km  walk 

‘Liquor  Lane’  and 

StFX  Campus 
(45°37.0’N,  61°59.5’W) 

flower  beds,  grassy  banks,  waste  ground,  margins  of 
conifer  stand;  ~1  km  walk 

Kells  Construction,  Antigonish 
Municipal  Facility 
(45°37.6’N,  61°59.5’W) 

waste  ground,  river  bank,  construction  waste  piles,  soil 
mounds;  ~1  km  walk 

Antigonish  Landing 
(45°38.0’N,  61°57.7’W) 

waste  ground,  soil  banks,  margins  of  marshy  areas, 
field;  ~  0.5  km  walk 

Tera  Tory  Drive 
(45°39.6’N,  61°54.7’W) 

roadside,  ditches,  lawns,  garden  plots;  2  km  drive 

LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  153 


Table  1  Continued 


Site  name  and  coordinates 

Habitats 

Seabright  Road 
(45°40.2’N,  61°57.6) 

roadside  and  ditches,  com  field,  waste  ground  around 
barn  construction  site,  margins  of  boreal  forest; 

2  km  drive 

Beech  Hill  Road 
(45°36.9'N,  61°58.3’W) 

waste  ground,  muddy  banks,  gravel  surfaces; 

5  km  drive 

Whidden’s  Camp  Ground 
(45°37.3’N,  61°59.9’W) 

grass  field  and  stream  banks;  waste  ground  at  margin  of 
parking  lots;  0.5  km  walk 

Mount  Cameron 
(45°37.8’N,  61°58.5'W) 

grassy  banks,  old  field,  gravel  surfaces,  garden  plots, 
soil  mounds  and  around  housing  construction  sites; 

0.5  km  walk 

Main  Street,  opposite  Hospital 
(45°37.7’N,  61°58.8’W) 

large  building  lot  consisting  of  waste  ground  and  fine 
gravel  with  numerous  soil  mounds  and  bare  banks; 

0.25  km  walk 

Archibalds  Point  Road 
(45°40.8'N,  61°54.6’W) 

roadside  and  ditches ,  garden  plots ,  margin  of  boreal  forest , 
disturbed  ground  at  building  site;  1  km  drive 

Antigonish  Mall 
(45°37.1’N,  61°58.9'W) 

waste  ground  and  soil  heaps  beside  parking  lot,  farmer’s 
field,  0.5  km  walk 

Adam  Street 
(45°37.5'N,  61°58.7’W) 

waste  ground  around  commercial  buildings  and  industrial 
sites,  small  garden  plot;  0.5  km  walk 

in  late  January  (Table  1).  The  31st  of  December  and  January  were  as¬ 
signed  to  the  final  period  in  each  month  (i.e.,  they  were  1 1  days  long). 
A  number  of  additional  sites  were  visited  once,  for  a  total  of  over  125 
site-time  combinations.  All  sites  were  located  within  30  km  of  the 
Town  of  Antigonish .  Except  for  occasional  forays  inland  to  St .  Andrews 
(45°32.8’N,  61°53.5’W)  and  Glen  Alpine  (45°28.8’N,  62°00.6,W), 
all  sites  were  within  5  km  of  salt  water.  Latitude  and  longitude  for 
each  site  were  determined  with  a  hand-held  global  positioning  unit 
(Garmin  GPS  12,  Garmin  Corp.,  Olathe,  Kansas)  or  calculated  from 
the  Nova  Scotia  Atlas  (Anonymous  2001)  with  values  rounded  to  the 
nearest  0.1’.  All  sites  were  at  low  elevation,  mostly  <  20  m  and  all 
<  75  m  above  sea  level.  Although  some  sites  were  revisited  within 
the  same  10-day  period,  only  new-found  species  for  that  collection 
period  were  counted  as  additions  to  the  list,  regardless  of  the  number 
of  visits.  Some  sites  were  visited  only  once  or  a  few  times  during  the 
study  because  of  logistic  constraints  or  the  occurrence  of  only  a  few 
species  in  flower.  At  each  site,  a  complete  list  of  species  in  bloom 
was  made  during  a  15-1 20  min  excursion  with  one  or  two  observers. 


154 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


At  least  one  specimen  of  each  species  was  collected  and  preserved. 
Vouchers  were  deposited  in  ST  FX.  Nomenclature  and  species  authori¬ 
ties  follow  Roland  (1998)  and  are  given  in  Appendix  1 . 

The  number  of  days  that  flowering  was  lengthened  was  calculated 
with  reference  to  the  latest  flowering  period  cited  by  Roland  (1998), 
with  the  last  day  of  the  cited  month  being  scored  as  within  the  flowering 
period.  Furthermore,  herbarium  records  at  ACAD,  NSAC  and  NSPM 
were  examined,  and  the  latest  flowering  time  among  these  specimens 
was  used  as  the  reference  point  for  counting  flowering  extension  when 
this  was  later  than  that  from  Roland  (see  Appendix  1).  Records  in  the 
three  herbaria  were  examined  for  the  Taylor  &  Garbary  (2003)  study; 
only  records  in  ACAD  (the  largest  regional  herbarium,  Holmgren  and 
Holmgren  1998)  were  re-evaluated  for  the  current  study.  Plants  were 
considered  in  blossom  if  a  single  flower  was  present  in  which  the  petals 
retained  their  natural  colour  and  the  pistils  or  stamens  remained  intact. 
Typically,  multiple  plants,  each  with  multiple  flowers,  were  present  at 
a  given  site.  Inconspicuous  flowers  (e.g.  Chenopodium  album)  were 
dissected  under  a  stereomicroscope  to  ensure  that  appropriate  organs 
were  present  before  including  the  species  in  the  list  of  actively  flowering 
species.  When  flowering  apparently  ended  in  2005  for  a  given  species 
earlier  than  in  2001 ,  this  was  recorded  as  a  number  of  negative  days 
in  the  calculation  of  the  overall  average  for  the  study  (see  Appendix 
1).  This  mitigated  potential  exaggeration  of  flowering  extension  times 
in  2005  relative  to  2001 . 

To  determine  if  late  flowering  was  consistent  with  evidence  of  climate 
change,  climate  data  from  two  weather  stations  in  Antigonish  County, 
at  Collegeville  (45°28’N,62°  1  ’  W,  1950-2005)  and  South  Side  Harbour 
(45°37'N,  61°54’W,  1997-2005)  were  obtained  by  downloading  data 
from  the  National  Climate  Data  and  Information  Archive  of  Environment 
Canada  (http://climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca).  South  Side  Harbour  is 
close  to  Antigonish  Harbour  and  7  km  from  the  Town  of  Antigonish; 
Collegeville  is  25  km  inland.  Only  the  Collegeville  station  has  suf¬ 
ficient  data  to  have  established  30-year  climate  normals  (1971  -2000) . 
Antigonish  County  falls  into  plant  hardiness  zone  5B  of  Agriculture 
Canada  (http:// sis  .agr.gc  .ca/ cansis/nsdb/climate/  hardiness/intro .html) , 
in  which  harsh  winters  kill  non-hardy  species  (see  Davis  &  Browne 
1997  for  regional  climate  summary). 

The  relationship  between  numbers  of  species  in  flower  during  each 
ten-day  period  and  weather  variables  during  the  fall  and  early  winter 
ot  2005-2006  was  explored  using  linear  correlations.  Mean  maximum, 


LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  155 


minimum  and  overall  mean  temperatures  were  computed  for  each  10- 
day  period  from  Environment  Canada  data  at  Collegeville.  In  addition, 
heat  units  (with  units  of  degree-days)  were  calculated  as  the  sum  of  the 
daily,  above-zero  maxima  for  each  period;  cold  units  were  calculated 
similarly  as  the  sum  of  all  daily  minima  below  zero.  Linear  regression 
was  also  used  to  model  the  decline  in  number  of  species  flowering  over 
time,  as  this  facilitated  comparisons  with  the  2001  study. 

RESULTS 

Weather  in  fall  2005. 

Temperatures  in  fall  are  typically  warmer  at  South  Side  Harbour, 
along  the  coast,  than  at  Collegeville,  which  lies  inland.  Frosts  arrive 
later  and  are  less  severe  near  the  coast  as  well  (Table  2).  Tempera¬ 
tures  throughout  the  fall  and  early  winter  of  2005  were  conspicuously 
warmer  than  usual .  At  Collegeville ,  mean  temperatures  remained  1  -3°C 
warmer  than  the  30-year  normal  from  September  to  December  (Table 
2).  The  bigger  difference,  however,  is  in  the  much  lower  frequency 
and  severity  of  frost  in  2005.  In  2005  there  were  only  3  days  of  frost 
at  Collegeville  in  October  2005,  and  14  in  November,  compared  with 
14  and  23  in  the  30-year  Normals  (Table  2).  Frosts  were  less  frequent 
nearer  the  coast,  where  most  flowering  observations  were  made.  The 
temperature  difference  between  2005  and  previous  years  is  less  obvi¬ 
ous  in  December,  but  even  in  this  month  the  daytime  high  was  above 
zero  on  15  days  at  Collegeville.  A  16-cm  snowfall  on  10  December 
would  have  insulated  low-lying  plants  from  the  most  severe  cold. 
Even  in  January,  the  coldest  month  of  the  year,  the  mean  maximum 
temperature  was  above  zero  in  2006. 

There  is  no  consistent  difference  among  most  temperature  statistics 
between  2001  and  2005;  the  earlier  year  was  warmer  in  some  months 
and  by  some  measures,  the  later  year  by  other  measures  or  in  other 
months.  The  number  of  frost  days,  however,  was  consistently  less  in 
2005  than  in  200 1  at  both  South  Side  Harbour  and  Collegeville  weather 
stations  (Table  2). 

Fall  climate  warming  in  northern  Nova  Scotia. 

In  addition  to  the  specific  temperature  indicators  in  Table  2,  we  also 
examined  changes  in  numbers  of  frost  days  between  1950  and  2005 
using  the  Collegeville  data  set  (Figure  1 ).  While  these  data  show  major 


156 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


fluctuations  on  a  year  to  year  basis,  there  is  no  apparent  trend  in  the 
five-year  running  average  until  the  mid  1990s,  after  which  there  is  a 
strong  decline.  This  decline  is  more  apparent  in  the  data  from  1997- 
2005  from  South  Side  Harbour  (Figure  2)  where  there  is  an  almost 
continuous  decline  in  number  of  frost  days  from  8  days  to  1  day,  and 
a  major  increase  in  days  to  first  frost  after  1  September  from  33  to 
61  days.  The  reduction  in  early  fall  frosts  may  be  a  key  factor  in  the 
persistence  of  flowering  after  1  November. 


Table  2  Climate  data  for  an  inland  site  (Collegeville)  and  a  coastal  site  (South  Side 
Harbour)  in  Antigonish  County  during  2001  and  2005,  and  30-year  climate 
normals  for  Collegeville,  1971-2000.  Climate  normals  not  yet  established  for 
South  Side  Harbour.  Some  data  missing  for  South  Side  Harbour  in  2005-2006; 
bracketed  numbers  allow  possibility  that  these  were  frost  days. 

Collegeville 

Temperature  (°C)  South  Side  Climate 


Month 

and  Frost  Days 

Harbour 

Collegeville 

Normals 

2005- 

2001- 

2001- 

2005- 

1971- 

2006 

2022 

2002 

2006 

2000 

Sept 

Mean  maximum 

21.5 

22.8 

22.8 

21.0 

18.8 

Mean 

16.1 

16.7 

15.6 

15.8 

13.5 

Mean  minimum 

10.7 

10.5 

9.1 

10.6 

7.8 

Extreme  minimum 

3.4 

0.5 

-2.0 

2.0 

- 

Frost  days 

0 

0 

2 

0 

4.9 

Oct 

Mean  maximum 

14.7 

17.2 

16.1 

14.5 

13.0 

Mean 

10.5 

11.1 

10.1 

9.9 

8.0 

Mean  minimum 

6.4 

5.0 

3.9 

5.2 

3.3 

Extreme  minimum 

-1.4 

-1.8 

-4.0 

-3.0 

_ 

Frost  days 

1 

4 

5 

3 

13.8 

Nov 

Mean  maximum 

10.0 

8.7 

8.8 

10.0 

6.9 

Mean 

5.6 

4.6 

4.3 

5.4 

2.9 

Mean  minimum 

1.3 

0.4 

0.3 

0.7 

-0.9 

Extreme  minimum 

-6.7 

-6.5 

-9.0 

-7 

Frost  days 

12 

17 

15 

12 

22.6 

Dec 

Mean  maximum 

1.8 

3.6 

-0.5 

2.2 

1.0 

Mean 

-2 

0.6 

-0.5 

-1.2 

-3.1 

Mean  minimum 

-5.9 

-2.6 

-3.5 

-4.7 

-7.5 

Extreme  minimum 

-15.1 

-9.25 

-10.0 

-17.5 

. 

Frost  days 

23  (25) 

25 

27 

25 

29.6 

Jan 

Mean  maximum 

3.5 

-1.1 

-2.2 

2.4 

-1.5 

Mean 

-0.2 

-4.8 

-7.1 

-0.7 

-6.6 

Mean  minimum 

-3.9 

-8.6 

-12.0 

-3.8 

-11.6 

Extreme  minimum 

-10.6 

-17.2 

-22.0 

-10.0 

Frost  days 

17(20) 

30 

31 

23 

28.8 

LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  157 


Fig  1  Days  of  frost,  September  and  October  combined ,  with  five  year  smoothed  line  based 

on  data  from  Collegeville. 


Fig  2  Number  of  frost  days  September  and  October  combined  (open  squares)  and  days 
to  first  frost  after  1  September  (filled  squares)  based  on  data  from  South  Side 
Harbour. 


158 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


Plants  in  flower. 

Over  1400  site-time  observations  of  flowering  were  made  during 
the  113  days  of  this  research  (Appendix  2).  The  field  observations 
produced  a  tally  of  136  species  from  the  21  sites  that  were  regularly 
visited  and  20  or  more  additional  sites  that  were  visited  once  or  a  few 
times  (Appendix  2).  Limited  destructive  sampling  of  plants  for  iden¬ 
tification  and  preparation  of  vouchers  necessitated  continual  explora¬ 
tion  of  new  sites.  Most  of  the  sites  represented  similar  habitats:  waste 
ground,  roadside  ditches,  lawns,  garden  plots  and  agricultural  fields 
(Table  1).  Most  sites  were  highly  disturbed,  many  with  less  than  50% 
cover  of  vegetation,  used  for  agriculture  or  industry  (e.g.,  building 
sites,  soil  dump  sites,  parking  lots,  ditches),  and  were  characterized 
by  pioneer  successional  communities  in  which  the  bulk  of  the  plants 
in  flower  were  herbaceous,  weedy  species.  Although  various  wetlands 
and  forest  communities  were  explored,  these  were  typically  devoid  of 
plants  in  flower.  Exceptions  were  open  spaces  in  mixed  conifer  for¬ 
est  at  Arisaig  with  Solidago  bicolor ,  a  streamside  Alnus  thicket  near 
Monastery  with  Solidago  flexicaulis ,  and  a  salt  marsh  at  Monks  Head 
(Pomquet  Harbour)  with  Solidago  sempervirens  and  Sueda  maritima. 

Unlike  the  survey  in  2001,  the  list  of  flowering  species  in  2005 
includes  woody  plants  for  the  first  time.  Three  of  the  four  species  ob¬ 
served  are  shrubs  that  normally  bloom  in  summer:  Spiraea  latifolia, 
Cornus  sericea  and  Symphoricarpos  albus.  The  fourth  species,  Salix 
sp.  (probably  pussy  willow,  S.  discolor  or  S.pellita )  ordinarily  blooms 
in  April  or  May.  All  of  these  species  were  found  at  either  more  than  one 
site  or  during  more  than  one  ten-day  period  (Appendix  2),  suggesting 
that  this  late  fall  flowering  was  more  than  a  rare  and  isolated  event. 

In  early  and  mid-November,  20-30  species  were  found  in  flower  at 
most  sites,  with  a  maximum  of  34.  By  the  end  of  November,  flowering 
was  conspicuously  reduced,  with  an  average  of  13  species  per  site  and 
a  maximum  of  23  species.  In  early  December  there  was  a  slight  further 
reduction  to  an  average  of  12  species  per  site  and  a  maximum  of  19. 
Middle  and  late  December  showed  a  mean  of  4  species  per  site  with  a 
maximum  of  6  species.  Snow  cover  and  low  temperatures  produced  a 
limited  window  lor  collecting  in  mid-December  and  precluded  visiting 
large  numbers  of  sites.  About  half  of  the  sites  visited  in  late  December 
had  no  species  flowering  and  several  still  had  extensive  snow  cover. 

A  total  of  22  species  remained  in  bloom  in  the  last  third  of  Decem¬ 
ber  (Figure  3),  indeed  15  observations  were  made  of  12  species  from 


LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  159 


four  sites  on  December  30,  when  air  temperature  reached  14°C.  These 
records  varied  from  the  occurrence  of  a  single  blossom  on  a  population 
of  dozens  of  individuals  ( Ranunculus  repens ),  to  abundant  blossoms 
on  many  highly  frost-compromised  (i.e.  wilted)  plants  (. Raphanus 
raphani  strum) ,  to  healthy  plants  with  large  numbers  of  buds  and  blos¬ 
soms  (e.g.,  Polygonum  arenastrum  and  Stellaria  media).  Taraxacum 
officinale  was  present  at  three  of  the  four  sites  visited,  albeit  with  only 
one  or  two  flowering  individuals  per  site.  All  of  these  species,  except 
Salix  sp.  and  Ranunculus  repens  had  been  in  bloom  in  every  ten-day 
period  since  the  beginning  of  November. 

There  was  little  change  in  the  flowering  species  between  the  end  of 
December  and  records  from  January.  Most  species  flowered  in  two  of 
the  three  time  intervals.  No  species  was  lost,  and  there  was  a  single 
record  of  Epigea  repens  added  in  mid- January.  Even  the  final  collection 
day  for  the  study  (21  January)  yielded  twelve  records  of  eight  species 
of  herbaceous  plants  from  seven  sites ,  with  two  further  records  of  Salix. 

Our  observations  in  2001  and  2005  (Appendix  1)  extend  the  known 
flowering  periods  of  plants  in  Nova  Scotia  by  70  days.  The  observa¬ 
tions  in  2001  for  some  species  are  later  than  those  collected  here,  but 
usually  within  the  same  ten-day  period.  The  late  January  collections 
(see  Garbary  &  Taylor  2007  for  details  of  these  collections)  provide 
the  latest  flowering  records  in  the  province. 

The  change  in  number  of  species  in  flower  over  consecutive  10-day 
periods  from  1  November  clearly  follows  a  two-phase  pattern  (Figure 
3).  Over  the  first  five  periods,  from  1  November  to  20  December,  the 
number  of  species  in  flower  declines  regularly,  to  a  minimum  of  12 
during  the  11-20  December  period.  Over  the  last  five  periods,  from 
11  Dec  to  21  January,  the  number  of  species  in  flower  remains  low 
(<  25)  and  more  or  less  constant.  The  fifth  period  is  a  transition  from 
the  first  phase  to  the  second.  The  decline  in  species  flowering  over  the 
first  five  periods  can  be  well  described  by  a  simple  linear  regression: 

Number  of  species  =  140.9-25.3  *  (Time  Period) 

(R2  =  0.99,  n  =  5,  p  =  0.0017) 

In  contrast,  the  change  in  species  flowering  over  the  last  5  periods  has 
no  significant  correlation  with  time ,  and  in  fact  r  =  0 .  Hence ,  rather  than 
the  flowering  period  ending  abruptly  at  the  first  deep  frost,  successive 
bouts  of  cold  weather  removed  progressively  more  species  from  the 


160 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


(/) 

o 

o 

03 

a 

w 


o 

jQ 

E 

3 


10-Day  Period 


Fig  3  Number  of  species  of  plants  recorded  in  bloom  in  Antigonish  County,  Nova  Scotia 
during  10-day  periods  from  1  November  2005  to  21  January  2006.  Periods  1-3 
cover  November,  3-6  cover  December  and  7-9  cover  January. 


Number  of  Species 
Flowering 

N)  O)  03  O  fO 

DOOOOOOO 

j_ i_ i_ i_ i_ i_ i_ i 

• 

• 

•  * 

V.  J  w 

v'#  o 

( 

<  i  .  i  . i 

)  20  40  60  80 

Heat  Units  (degree-days) 

Fig  4  Relationship  between  number  of  species  of  plants  in  flower  from  1  November  2005 
lo  _  1  January  2006  and  cumulative  heat  units  in  each  10-day  period.  Dark  circles 
repicsent  data  from  1  November  to  20  December,  when  the  number  of  species 
declined  lineai  ly.  Open  circles  are  data  from  2 1  December  to  2 1  January,  when  the 
number  ot  species  in  flower  was  approximately  constant. 


LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  161 


flowering  pool.  The  final  group  of  species,  those  that  persisted  until 
mid-January,  were  evidently  able  to  prolong  their  growing  season 
even  further  because  of  the  continued  mild  weather  and  their  ability 
to  suffer  frosts  that  were  fatal  to  less  resistant  species. 

Over  the  entire  nine  periods,  the  number  of  species  in  flower  is  more 
or  less  equally  correlated  with  mean  maximum,  mean  minimum  and 
daily  mean  temperatures  and  cumulative  heat  units  in  each  period 
(r  =  0.82  to  0.84,  n  =9).  Only  cold  units  are  a  relatively  poor  predictor 
of  number  of  species  (r  =  0.73).  Nevertheless,  the  response  in  number 
of  species  flowering  to  temperature  during  the  last  four  10-day  periods 
appears  to  be  weaker  than  that  during  the  first  five  periods  (Figure  4). 
This  is  probably  so  because  after  20  December  there  were  only  a  few 
species  available  to  reflower  when  the  weather  turned  warmer  again 
at  the  end  of  the  month,  the  others  having  entered  dormancy  or  suc¬ 
cumbed  to  frost.  Therefore  above-zero  temperatures  were  less  effective 
in  encouraging  flowering  late  in  the  season  than  earlier. 

In  the  2001  study,  flowering  ended  in  the  fifth  10-day  period,  be¬ 
tween  11  and  20  December.  Over  those  five  periods  however,  the 
rate  of  decline  in  2005  appears  remarkably  similar  to  that  in  200 1 . 
Adirect  comparison  between  the  two  equations  is  not  possible ,  however, 
because  of  the  greater  number  of  species  collected  in  2005.  To  correct 
for  this  disparity,  the  200 1  and  2005  regressions  were  both  recomputed 
in  terms  of  percentages  of  the  total  number  of  species  found  in  bloom 
that  year.  The  slope  of  the  line  in  2005  (-18.7  ±  1 .7  %  period1)  is  not 
significantly  different  (t  =  1 .59,  p  >  0.10)  from  the  slope  of  the  line  in 
2001  (-17.4  ±  1.0%  period1).  Hence,  the  identical  ecological  process 
of  sequential  removal  of  progressively  more  frost-resistant  species 
appears  to  have  been  active  in  both  years. 

DISCUSSION 

This  study  and  the  previous  one  (Taylor  &  Garbary  2003)  were  initi¬ 
ated  because  of  the  high  diversity  of  plants  in  flower  and  the  robustness 
of  flowering  in  early  November  of  2005  (and  2001).  This  pattern  was 
highly  unusual  for  northern  Nova  Scotia,  where  frosts  in  September 
and  October  typically  terminate  flowering  of  all  but  the  most  robust 
species.  While  some  of  our  records  are  based  on  a  single  plant  with  a 
single  inflorescence  (e.g .,Hieracium  aurantiacum  on  15  November), 
many  of  our  records,  even  those  in  January,  are  based  on  multiple 


162 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


specimens,  from  multiple  times  and  multiple  sites  (Appendix  2  and 
Garbary  &  Taylor  2007). 

This  study  of  late  flowering  phenology  in  a  local  area  of  Nova 
Scotia  provides  an  empirical  approach  to  documenting  biological 
responses  to  changes  in  weather  patterns,  if  not  the  impact  of  climate 
change.  Our  use  of  herbarium  records  to  establish  baseline  flowering 
phenologies  is  consistent  with  previous  work  in  northeastern  North 
America  by  Miller-Rushing  et  al.  (2006)  and  Primack  et  al.  (2004), 
although  these  studies  used  estimates  of  peak  flowering  times  rather 
than  latest  flowering  times.  Our  use  of  herbarium  specimens  and  the 
regional  flora  (Roland  1998)  as  starting  points  against  which  to  gauge 
our  observations  assumes  that  prior  observations  and  collections  were 
made  throughout  the  flowering  period .  We  have  mitigated  this  potential 
source  of  error  by  assuming  that  the  last  day  of  the  month  cited  by 
Roland  (1998),  or  the  latest  herbarium  specimen  in  ACAD  or  NS  AC, 
was  the  end  of  the  flowering  period;  this  minimizes  our  estimate  of 
the  flowering  period  extension.  Furthermore,  our  primary  reference 
herbarium,  AC  AD,  is  in  a  warmer  plant  hardiness  zone  than  Antigonish 
(5B  rather  than  5A),  and  plants  from  the  Annapolis  Valley  might  be 
assumed  to  have  a  later  flowering  period  than  those  from  Antigonish 
County  do.  Many  of  the  collections  of  roadside  flowers  and  ruderals 
in  ACAD,  NS  AC  and  STFX  are  student  collections  made  as  part  of 
course  assignments,  and  therefore  many  specimens  would  likely  have 
been  collected  later  in  the  autumn,  toward  the  end  of  flowering  periods 
when  some  collectors  were  attempting  to  meet  course  requirements. 
This  background,  combined  with  over  20  years  experience  on  the  lo¬ 
cal  flora  by  DJG  and  BRT,  gives  us  confidence  in  our  conclusion  that 
200 1  and  2005  represent  major  anomalies  in  flowering  phenology  for 
the  Antigonish  area,  and  these  events  were  associated  with  an  apparent 
fall  warming  trend  in  the  area  (Table  2). 

Our  results  complement  and  extend  the  previous  study  by  Taylor 
&  Garbary  (2003)  that  showed  a  45  day  average  extension  of  known 
flowering  durations  for  Nova  Scotia  during  2001.  The  current  study 
suggested  a  further  25  day  extension  in  mean  flowering  duration  for 
the  135  documented  species.  We  conclude  that  persistent  flowering 
beyond  the  normal  growing  season  is  a  reliable  integrator  of  weather 
phenomena  associated  with  a  warming  climate  (i.e.,  higher  mean  tem¬ 
peratures,  later  frost,  less  frequent  and  less  severe  cold  periods),  and 
therefore  fall-flowering  surveys  can  be  a  useful  instrument  to  document 
and  detect  climate  change.  Table  2  shows  that  2001  and  2005  were 


LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  163 


consistently  warmer  than  climate  normals  based  on  a  variety  of  metrics . 
Furthermore,  we  documented  an  apparent  change  in  temperature  since 
the  mid  1 990s  as  shown  by  a  reduction  of  frost  occurrences  in  northern 
Nova  Scotia  (Figures  1-2).  Whether  these  are  part  of  an  ongoing  trend 
remains  to  be  established,  but  they  are  consistent  with  predictions  of 
global  climate  change  (e.g.,  Walther  et  al.  2005). 

While  our  systematic  observations  were  carried  out  only  in  2001 
and  2005,  casual  observations  in  all  other  years  since  2001  did  not 
show  the  diversity  of  species  in  flower  or  robustness  of  flowering  after 
1  Nov  that  we  observed  during  the  study  years.  In  2009  and  2010  for 
example,  typical  frosts  occurred  in  October  and  casual  observation 
of  several  sites  by  one  of  us  (DJG)  revealed  fewer  than  ten  species  in 
flower  at  any  site  in  Antigonish  County  during  November.  Our  analysis 
of  climate  data  for  the  region  (Table  2)  shows  that  the  fall  and  early 
winter  seasons  of  2001  and  2005  were  particularly  mild,  and  supports 
our  conclusion  that  late  flowering  is  a  response  to  milder  temperatures. 

It  is  remarkable  that  the  rate  of  disappearance  of  flowering  species, 
expressed  as  a  percentage  of  the  total,  through  the  first  five  10-day 
periods  should  follow  the  same  linear  trajectory  in  2005  as  in  2001, 
especially  given  that  the  2005  survey  includes  many  new  species. 
This  pattern  has  been  interpreted  previously  as  successive  cold  snaps 
acting  as  environmental  sieves,  separating  groups  of  species  accord¬ 
ing  to  increasing  frost  tolerance  (Taylor  &  Garbary  2003).  The  reap¬ 
pearance  of  the  same  pattern  in  2005  as  in  2001  suggests  that  most 
ruderal  species  are  differentiated  along  this  niche  axis.  As  well,  the 
apparent  generality  of  the  pattern  suggests  that  deviations  from  the 
expected  sequence  may  be  used  as  an  indicator  of  climate  change. 
Such  a  deviation  was  observed  in  the  current  study,  when  the  final, 
most  persistent  group  of  species,  rather  than  succumbing  to  deep  cold 
as  winter  approached,  instead  persisted  well  into  January  along  with 
the  unseasonable  warmth. 

The  majority  of  studies  on  changes  in  phenology  in  relation  to  climate 
warming  refer  to  the  advancement  of  flowering  or  other  phenomena 
in  the  spring,  and  much  smaller  effects  during  the  fall  (e.g.,  Cleland 
et  al.  2007,  Fitter  &  Fitter  2002,  Gu  et  al.  2008,  Menzel  et  al.  2006, 
and  references  therein).  Hence  the  apparent  45-day  prolongation  of 
flowering  reported  by  Taylor  &  Garbary  (2003) ,  and  the  further  25 -day 
apparent  prolongation  reported  here  (Appendix  1 )  would  seem  counter 
to  generalized  responses  in  the  literature.  It  may  be  that  later  flowering 


164 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


is  more  difficult  to  document  as  it  requires  multiple  visits  to  many  sites 
as  was  done  here  and  in  Taylor  &  Garbary  (2003). 

The  135  species  recorded  in  this  study  represent  about  10%  of  the 
total  vascular  flora  of  Nova  Scotia.  However,  the  dicotyledenous 
flora  of  Nova  Scotia  consists  of  about  970  species.  Based  on  distribu¬ 
tions  reported  in  Roland  (1998)  and  additions  in  Garbary  &  Deveau 
(2007)  and  Taylor  et  al.  (2008),  only  about  75%  of  this  diversity  may 
be  represented  in  Antigonish  County,  a  small  area  with  low  habitat 
and  climatic  diversity  (Davis  &  Browne  1997).  Hence,  the  species 
we  observed  flowering  during  November-January  comprise  ~20% 
of  the  local  diversity  of  dicots.  This  total  qualifies  the  late  flowering 
assemblage  as  a  significant  component  of  the  angiosperm  flora,  and 
highlights  the  phenological  changes  that  can  arise  from  even  slight 
changes  in  temperature.  The  capacity  of  so  many  species  to  extend 
or  recommence  flowering  in  warm  fall  weather  raises  the  prospect  of 
even  greater  blooming  for  longer  periods  with  climate  change  that 
includes  further  warming  during  the  late  autumn  and  early  winter.  It 
remains  to  be  determined  if  viable  seeds  can  be  produced  by  these  late 
fall  flowering  species,  especially  those  that  require  insect  pollination. 

Acknowledgements  We  thank  Anne  Louise  MacDonald,  Randy 
Lauff  and  Ian  Bryson  for  contributing  several  collections  to  this  study, 
and  Ruth  Newell  of  ACAD  for  access  to  collections.  This  work  was 
supported  by  a  research  grant  from  the  Natural  Sciences  and  Engineer¬ 
ing  Research  Council  of  Canada  to  DJG. 

REFERENCES 

Abu-Asab  MS,  Peterson  PM,  Shetler  SG,  Orli  SS  (2001)  Earlier  plant 
flowering  in  spring  as  a  response  to  global  warming  in  the  Washington, 
DC,  area.  Biodiversity  and  Bioconservation  10:597-612. 

Anonymous  (2001)  The  Nova  Scotia  Atlas,  5th  ed.  Prepared  by  Service  Nova 
Scotia  and  Municipal  Relations,  Nova  Scotia  Geomatics  Centre.  Formac 
Publishing  and  Province  of  Nova  Scotia,  Halifax,  N.S. 

Badeck  FW,  Bondeau  A,  Bottcher  K,  Doktor  D,  Lucht  W,  Schaber  J, 
Sitch  S  (2005)  Responses  of  spring  phenology  to  climate  change.  New 
Phytologist  162:295-309. 

Cleland  EE,  Chuine  I,  Menzel  A,  Mooney  HA,  Schwartz  MD  (2007) 
Shitting  plant  phenology  in  response  to  global  change.  Trends  in  Ecology 
and  Evolution  22:357-365. 


LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  165 


Core  Writing  Team,  Pachauri  RK,  Reisinger  A  (Editors)  IPCC  (2007) 
Climate  Change  2007:  Synthesis  Report.  Contribution  of  Working  Groups 
I ,  II  and  III  to  the  Fourth  Assessment  Report  of  the  Intergovernmental  Panel 
on  Climate  Change.  IPCC,  Geneva,  Switzerland. 

Davis  DS,  Browne  S  (eds)  (1997)  The  Natural  History  of  Nova  Scotia,  Vol. 
1.  Topics  and  Habitats.  Nimbus  Publishing  and  Nova  Scotia  Provincial 
Museum,  Halifax,  N.S.,  Canada. 

Dunne  JA,  Harte  J,  Taylor  KJ  (2003)  Subalpine  meadow  flowering 
phenology  responses  to  climate  change:  integrating  experimental  and 
gradient  methods.  Ecological  Monographs  73:69-86. 

Fitter  AH,  Fitter  RSR  (2002)  Rapid  changes  in  flowering  time  in  British 
plants.  Science  296:1689-1691. 

Garbary  DJ,  Deveau  A  (2007)  The  Spindle  Tree,  Euonymus  europaea  L. 
(Celastraceae):  a  newly  naturalized  shrub  in  Nova  Scotia.  Canadian  Field- 
Naturalist  121:85-88. 

Garbary  DJ, Taylor  BR  (2007)  Plant  flowering  during  January  in  Antigonish 
County,  Nova  Scotia.  Canadian  Field-Naturalist  121:76-80. 

Gu  L,  Hanson  PJ,  Post  WM,  Kaiser  DP,  Yang  B,  Nemani  R,  Pallardy 
SG,  Meyers  T  (2008)  The  2007  eastern  US  spring  freeze:  increased  cold 
damage  in  a  warming  world?  Bioscience  58:253-262. 

Holmgren  PK,  Holmgren  NH  (1998)  [continuously  updated].  Index 
herbariorum:  A  Global  Directory  of  Public  Herbaria  and  Associated  Staff. 
New  York  Botanical  Garden’s  Virtual  Herbarium,  http://sweetgum.nybg. 
org/ih / 

Houghton  JT,  Ding  Y,  Griggs  DJ,  Noguer  M,  van  der  Linden  PJ,  Dai 
X,  Maskell  K,  Johnson  CA  (2001)  Climate  Change  2001:  The  Scientific 
Basis.  Cambridge  University  Press,  Cambridge. 

Houle  G  (2007)  Spring-flowering  herbaceous  plant  species  of  the  deciduous 
forests  of  eastern  Canada  and  20th  century  climate  warming.  Canadian 
Journal  of  Forest  Research  37:505-512. 

Hovenden  MJ,  Willis  KE,SchoorJKV,  Williams  AL, Newton  PCD  (2008) 
Flowering  phenology  in  a  species-rich  temperate  grassland  is  sensitive  to 
warming  but  not  elevated  COr  New  Phytologist  178:815-822. 

Hughes  L  (2000)  Biological  consequences  of  global  warming:  is  the  signal 
already.  Trends  in  Ecology  and  Evolution  15:56-61. 

Lavoie  C,  Lachance  D  (2006)  A  new  herbarium-based  method  for 
reconstructing  the  phenology  of  plant  species  across  large  areas.  American 
Journal  of  Botany  93:512-516. 

McCarty  JP  (2001)  Ecological  consequences  of  recent  climate  change. 
Conservation  Biology  15:  320-331. 

Menzel  A  (2002)  Phenology:  its  importance  to  the  global  change  community. 
Climate  Change  54:379-385. 

Menzel  A  (2003)  Plant  phenological  anomalies  in  Germany  and  their  relation 
to  air  temperature.  Climate  Change  57:243-263. 

Menzel  A,  Estrella  N,  Fabian  P  (2001)  Spatial  and  temporal  variability  of 
the  phonological  seasons  in  Germany  from  1951  to  1996.  Global  Change 
Biology  7:  657-666. 


166 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


Menzel  A,  Estrella  N,  Testka  A  (2005)  Temperature  response  rates  from 
long-term  phenological  records.  Climate  Research  30:21-28. 

Menzel  A,  Fabian  P  (1999)  Growing  season  extended  in  Europe.  Nature 
397:659. 

Menzel  A,  Sparks  TH,  Estrella  N,  Koch  E,  Aasa  A,  Ahas  R,  Alm-Kuebler 
K,  Bissolli  P,  Braslavska  O,  Briede  A,  Chmielewski  FM,  Crepinsek  Z, 
Curnel  Y,  Dahl  A,  Defila  C,  Donnelly  A,  Filella  Y,  Jatcza  K,  Mage  F, 
Mestre  A,  Nordli  O,  Penuelas  J,  Pirinen  P,  Remisova  V,  Scheifinger 
H,  Striz  M,  Susnik  A,  Van  Vliet  AJH,  Wielgolaski  FE,  Zach  S,  Zust 
A  (2006)  European  phenological  response  to  climate  change  matches  the 
warming  pattern.  Global  Change  Biology  12:1969-1976. 

Miller-Rushing  AJ,  Primack  RB  (2008)  Global  warming  and  flowering  times 
in  Thoreau’s  Concord:  A  community  perspective.  Ecology  89:332-341 . 

Miller-Rushing  AJ,  Primack  RB,  Primack  D,  Mukunda  S  (2006) 
Photographs  and  herbarium  specimens  as  tools  to  document  phenological 
changes  in  response  to  global  warming.  American  Journal  of  Botany 
93:1667-1674. 

Parmesan  C  (2007)  Influences  of  species,  latitudes  and  methodologies  on 
estimates  of  phenological  response  to  global  warming.  Global  Change 
Biology  13:1860-1872. 

Post  ES ,  Pedersen  C ,  Wilmers  C  C ,  F  orchhammer  MC  (2008 )  Phenological 
sequences  reveal  aggregate  life  history  response  to  climate  warming. 
Ecology  89:363-370. 

Primack  D,  Imbres  C,  Primack  RB,  Miller- Rushing  AJ,  Tredici  P  (2004) 
Herbarium  specimens  demonstrate  earlier  flowering  times  in  response  to 
warming  in  Boston.  American  Journal  of  Botany  91:1260-1264. 

Roland,  AE  ( 1 998)  Roland’s  Flora  of  Nova  Scotia.  3rd  edition.  Revised  by  M. 
Zinck.  Nimbus  Publishing  and  Nova  Scotia  Museum,  Halifax,  Nova  Scotia. 

Roland  AE,  Smith  EC  ( 1 969)  The  Flora  of  Nova  Scotia,  2nd  ed.  Nova  Scotia 
Provincial  Museum,  Halifax,  N.S. 

Root  TL,  Price  JT,  Hall  KR,  Schneider  SH,  Rosenzweig  C,  Pounds  JA 

(2003)  Fingerprints  of  global  warming  on  wild  animals  and  plants.  Nature 
421:57-60. 

Schaber  J,  Badeck  FW  (2005)  Plant  phenology  in  Germany  over  the  20th 
century.  Regional  Environmental  Change  5:37-46. 

Schlelp  C,  Sparks  TH,  Estrella  N,  Menzel  A  (2009)  Spatial  variation  in 
onset  dates  and  trends  in  phenology  across  Europe.  Climate  Research 
39(Sp.  Iss.  19):249-260. 

Sparks  TH,  Menzel  A  (2002)  Observed  changes  in  seasons:  an  overview. 
International  Journal  of  Climatology  22:1715-1725. 

Taylor  BR,  Garbary  DJ  (2003)  Late-flowering  plants  from  northern  Nova 
Scotia,  Canada.  Rhodora  105:118-135. 

Taylor  BR, Garbary  DJ ,  Ferrier  J,Lauff  R  (2008)  New  distribution  records 
lor  flow  ei  ing  plants  in  Antigonish  County,  Nova  Scotia.  Proceedings  of  the 
Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  44: 109- 1 23 . 


LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  167 


Thakur  PS,  Dutt  V,  Thakur  A  (2008)  Impact  of  interannual  climate  vari¬ 
ability  on  the  phenology  of  eleven  multipurpose  tree  species.  Current 
Science  94:1053-1058. 

Thorhallsdottir  TE  (1998)  Flowering  phenology  in  the  central  highland  of 
Iceland  and  implications  for  climatic  warming  in  the  Arctic.  Oecologia 
114:43-49. 

Walther  GR  (2002)  Weakening  of  climatic  constraints  with  global  warming 
and  its  consequences  for  evergreen  broad-leaved  species .  Folia  Geobotanica 
37:129-139. 

Walther  GR  (2004)  Plants  in  a  warmer  world.  Perspectives  in  Plant  Ecology 
Evolution  and  Systematics  6:169-185. 

Walther  GR,  Berger  S,  Sykes  MT  (2005a)  An  ecological  ‘footprint’  of 
climate  change.  Proceedings  of  the  Royal  Society  of  London,  Series  B, 
Biology  272:1427-1432. 

Walther  GR,  BeiBner  S,  Burga  CA  (2005b)  Trends  in  the  upward  shift  of 
alpine  plants.  Journal  of  Vegetation  Science  16:541-548. 

Walther  GR,  Burga  CA,  Edwards  PJ  (eds.)  (2001)  “Fingerprints”  of 
Climate  Change  -  Adapted  Behaviour  and  Shifting  Species  Ranges .  Kluwer 
Academic/Plenum  Publishers,  New  York. 

Walther  GR,  Hughes  L,  Vitousek  P,  Stenseth  NC  (2005)  Consensus  on 
climate  change.  Trends  in  Ecology  and  Evolution  20:648-649. 

White  MA,  Hoffman  F,  Hargrove  WW,  Nemani  RR  (2005)  A  global 
framework  for  monitoring  phenological  responses  to  climate  change. 
Geophysics  Research  Letters  32:L04705,  doi:101029/2004GL021961. 


168 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


Appendix  1  Combined  list  of  species  from  2001  and  2005  that  were  observed  flowering  in 
Antigonish  County  after  November  1  st .  The  date  given  under  latest  herbarium 
record  indicates  the  latest  flowering  specimens  found  in  one  of  the  following 
herbaria  -  ACAD,  NS  AC  or  NSPM.  Flowering  extension  (days)  indicates  the 
number  of  additional  flowering  days  in  Antigonish  County  compared  with 
the  latest  times  given  in  Roland  (1998)  or  a  previous  herbarium  collection. 
Symbols  are  as  follows:  Question  marks  indicate  missing  data;  #-Species 
found  in  2001  study  but  not  in  the  fall  of  2005;  ^-earliest  flowering  times  for 
two  pussy  willow  species;  ^interpreted  as  late  second  flowering  rather  than 
early  flowering  -  see  text. 


Species  Flowering  Latest 

in  Roland  herbarium 
(1998)  record 

Latest 

flowering 

2001 

Latest 

flowering 

2005 

Flowering 

extension 

(days) 

Achillea  millefolium  L. 

Sep 

2  Dec  ‘05 

14  Dec 

12  Jan 

29 

Allium  schoenoprasum  L. 

July 

1  Aug  ‘57 

- 

2  Dec 

124 

Ambrosia  artemisiifolia  L. 

Sep 

16  Nov  ‘06 

- 

23  Nov 

7 

Anaphalis  margaritaceae  (L.) 

Sep 

18  Oct  ‘81 

5  Dec 

6  Nov 

-29 

Benth.  &  Hook. 

Anthemis  tinctoria  L. 

Sep 

3  Aug  ‘51 

- 

2  Dec 

122 

Arctium  minus  (Hill.)  Bemh. 

Sep 

15  Nov  ‘94 

- 

13  Nov 

0 

Aster  ciliolatus  Lindl. 

Sep 

14  Aug  ‘68 

12  Dec 

2  Dec 

-10 

A.  cordifolius  L. 

Oct 

18  Oct  ‘79 

12  Dec 

22  Nov 

-20 

A.  lateriflorus  (L.)  Britton 

Sep 

28  Oct  ‘87 

10  Dec 

3  Dec 

-7 

A.  novae-angliae  L. 

Oct 

16  Nov  ‘05 

- 

1  Nov 

- 

A.  novi-belgii  L. 

Sep 

2  Dec  ‘05 

10  Dec 

3  Dec 

-7 

A.  puniceus  L. 

Sep 

7  Oct  ‘30 

11  Nov 

3  Dec 

22 

A.  umbellatus  P.  Mill. 

Sep 

9  Sep  ‘54 

- 

6  Nov 

36 

# Beilis  perennis  L. 

Sep 

6  July  ‘50 

16  Nov 

- 

47 

Berteroa  incana  (L.)  DC 

Sep 

1  Oct  ‘41 

- 

1  Nov 

31 

Bidens  connata  Muhl. 

Sep 

6  Sep  ‘52 

- 

7  Nov 

38 

#  Bide  ns  frondosa  L. 

Sep 

29  Sep  ‘41 

7  Nov 

_ 

37 

Brassica  nigra  (L.) 

Oct 

1 1  Nov  ‘69 

10  Nov 

2  Nov 

-8 

W.J.D.  Koch 

#B.  rapa  L. 

Oct 

27  Sep  ‘91 

12  Dec 

_ 

. 

Campanula  rapunculoides  L. 

Aug 

20  Sep  ‘79 

7  Nov 

3  Nov 

-4 

Capsella  bursa-pastoris  (L.) 

Nov 

2  Dec  ‘05 

14  Dec 

14  Jan 

31 

Medik. 

Cardamine  pensylvanica 

Aug 

1 1  Sep  ‘49 

15  Dec 

21  Jan 

37 

Muhl.  ex  Willd. 

Centaurea  nigra  L. 

Sep 

20  Nov  ‘94 

17  Nov 

15  Nov 

-2 

Cerastium  vulgatum  L. 

? 

12  Dec  ‘06 

15  Nov 

21  Jan 

44 

Chenopodium  album  L. 

? 

14  Oct  ‘79 

17  Nov 

1  Dec 

14 

C.  glaucum  L. 

Oct 

- 

_ 

22  Nov 

22 

Chaenorrhinum  minus  (L.) 

Aug 

4  Sep  ‘48 

15  Nov 

15  Nov 

0 

Lange 

Chrysanthemum 

July 

18  Sep  ‘83 

26  Nov 

22  Nov 

-4 

leucanthemum  L. 

Cichorium  intybus  L. 

Aug 

15  Oct  ‘90 

. 

12  Nov 

28 

Cirsium  arvense  (L.)  Scop. 

Aug 

9  Oct  ‘30 

18  Nov 

39 

C.palustre  (L.)  Scop. 

July 

9  Aug  ‘45 

_ 

6  Nov 

90 

C.  vulgare  (Savi)  Tenore 

Sept 

1  Oct  ‘32 

. 

7  Nov 

36 

#Conioselinum  chinense  (L.) 

Sep 

17  Sep  ‘55 

1 1  Nov 

Britton,  Stems  &  Poggenb. 

LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  169 


Appendix  1  Continued 


Species  Flowering  Latest  Latest  Latest  Flowering 

in  Roland  herbarium  flowering  flowering  extension 
(1998)  record  2001  2005  (days) 


Cornus  sericea  L. 

June 

4  Sep  ‘25 

_ 

22  Nov 

80 

Coronilla  varia  L. 

July 

13  Sep  ‘90 

12  Nov 

50 

ttDianthus  armeria  L. 

July 

1  Oct  ‘67 

19  Nov 

- 

§ 

Daucus  carota  L. 

Sep 

2  Dec  ‘05 

20  Nov 

2  Dec 

0 

Echinocystis  lobata  (Michx .) 

Oct 

30  Sep  ‘90 

- 

12  Nov 

12 

T.&G. 

Echium  vulgare  L. 

Sep 

18  Aug  ‘55 

* 

2  Nov 

33 

Epigaea  repens  L. 

May 

7  Nov  ‘98 

- 

14  Jan 

68 

Erigeron  annuus  (L.)  Pers. 

Sep 

1  Oct  ‘45 

16  Nov 

24  Nov 

8 

E.  philadelphicus  L. 

Aug 

14  June  ‘51 

- 

2  Nov 

64 

E.  strigosus  Muhl.  Ex  Willd. 

Sep 

16  Nov  ‘06 

8  Dec 

6  Nov 

-32 

Erucastrum  gallicum  (Willd.) 

Oct 

18  Sep  ‘54 

12  Dec 

3  Dec 

-9 

O.E.  Schulz 

Erysimum  cheiranthoides  L. 

Sep 

16  Nov  ‘06 

15  Dec 

14  Jan 

30 

Euphorbia  helioscopia  L. 

Sep 

7  Jan  ‘02 

14  Dec 

21  Jan 

17 

Euphrasia  officinalis  L. 

Sep 

10  Oct  ‘30 

10  Nov 

24  Nov 

14 

Euthamnia  graminifolia  (L.) 

Sep 

17  Oct  ‘17 

22  Nov 

1  Nov 

-21 

Nutt. 

Fragaria  vesca  L. 

June 

27  July  ‘46 

- 

1  Nov 

63 

F.  virginiana  Duchesne 

May 

5  Sep  ‘86 

27  Nov 

15  Nov 

-12 

Fumaria  officinalis  L. 

Aug 

6  Sep  ‘54 

- 

14  Jan 

131 

Galeopsis  tetrahit  L. 

Sep 

10  Oct  ‘69 

14  Dec 

3  Dec 

-11 

Galium  mollugo  L. 

Aug 

23  Aug  ‘52 

- 

1  Dec 

93 

Glechoma  hederacea  L. 

Summer 

1  Aug  ‘62 

- 

2  Nov 

64 

Hesperis  matronalis  L. 

July 

25  Sep  ‘63 

17  Nov 

22  Nov 

5 

Hieracium  aurantiacum  L. 

Aug 

18  Oct ‘79 

- 

15  Nov 

27 

H .  floribundum  Wimm. 

July 

3  Dec-06 

24  Nov 

- 

- 

&  Grab 

H.  lachenalii  C.  Gmelin. 

Aug 

16  Nov  ‘05 

- 

3  Dec 

17 

H.  paniculatum  L. 

Sept 

17  Sep  ‘45 

- 

15  Nov 

46 

H.  piloselloides  Vill. 

July 

29  Aug  ‘62 

- 

6  Nov 

69 

Hypericum  perforatum  L. 

Aug 

12  Nov  ‘79 

5  Nov 

7  Nov 

-5 

#Lamium  amplexicaule  L. 

Nov 

18  Sep  ‘79 

8  Dec 

- 

- 

Lathyrus  pratensis  L. 

July 

15  Aug  ‘  66 

- 

2  Nov 

79 

Leontodon  autumnalis  L. 

Oct 

3  Dec  ‘05 

16-Dec 

30  Dec 

14 

Lepidium  campestre  (L.) 

Sep 

3  Sep  ‘69 

6-Dec 

18  Dec 

12 

R.Br. 

L.  virginicum  L. 

Sep 

2  Dec  ‘06 

5-Dec 

15  Nov 

-20 

Linaria  vulgaris  Mill. 

Aug 

18  Nov  1869 

5-Dec 

28  Nov 

-7 

Lupinus  polyphyllus  Lindl. 

July 

20  Sep  ‘79 

- 

11  Nov 

53 

Malva  moschata  L. 

July 

3  Dec  ‘05 

- 

1  Dec 

-2 

M.  neglecta  Wallr. 

Oct 

2  Dec  ‘05 

14-Dec 

14  Nov 

-30 

#M.  rotundifolia  L. 

? 

18  Oct  ‘92 

10-Nov 

- 

- 

Matricaria  maritima  L. 

Aug 

2  Dec  ‘05 

15-Dec 

13  Jan 

29 

M.  matricarioides  (Less.) 

Nov 

16  Nov  ‘06 

14-Dec 

14  Jan 

31 

Porter 

Medicago  lupulina  L. 

Sep 

7  Oct  ‘87 

12-Dec 

9  Nov 

-33 

M.  sativa  L. 

Aug 

16  Nov  ‘05 

- 

1  Nov 

-15 

170 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


Appendix  1  Continued 


Species 

Flowering 
in  Roland 
(1998) 

Latest 

herbarium 

record 

Latest 

flowering 

2001 

Latest 

flowering 

2005 

Flowering 

extension 

(days) 

Melilotus  alba  Desr. 

Aug 

9  Nov  ‘79 

20-Nov 

2  Dec 

12 

M.  officinalis  (L.)  Lam. 

Aug 

19  Sep  ‘71 

11 -Nov 

14  Nov 

3 

Myosotis  laxa  Lehm. 

July 

10  Oct  ‘30 

- 

12  Nov 

33 

M.  scorpioides  L. 

July 

13  Oct  ‘30 

- 

6  Nov 

24 

Oenothera  biennis  L. 

Oct 

16  Oct  ‘15 

24-Nov 

24  Nov 

0 

O .  perennis  L. 

Sep 

6  Sep  ‘38 

10-Nov 

- 

- 

Oxalis  dillenii  Jacq. 

9 

6  Sep  ‘29 

4  Nov 

60 

Pastinaca  sativa  L. 

July 

5  Sep  ‘62 

5-Dec 

2  Dec 

-3 

Physalis  heterophylla  Nees 

Aug 

25  Oct  ‘49 

- 

12  Nov 

18 

Plantago  lanceolata  L. 

Oct 

11  Nov  ‘79 

11 -Nov 

13  Nov 

2 

Polygonum  arenastrum 
Jord.  ex  Boreau 

9 

24  Oct  ‘23 

12-Dec 

30  Dec 

18 

P.  aviculare  L. 

Nov 

- 

- 

19  Nov 

-11 

P.  convolvulus  L. 

Nov 

16  Oct  ‘44 

24-Nov 

15  Nov 

-9 

P.  cuspidatum  Sieb.  &  Zucc. 

Sep 

6  Oct  ‘78 

- 

1  Nov 

26 

P.  hydropiper  L. 

? 

11  Nov  ‘05 

- 

12  Nov 

1 

P.  lapathifolium  L. 

9 

31  Aug  ‘55 

- 

5  Nov 

67 

P.  pensylvanicum  L. 

? 

17  Sep  ‘13 

- 

9  Nov 

54 

P.  persicaria  L . 

Oct 

10  Dec  ‘25 

25  Nov 

15  Nov 

-10 

P.  sagittatum  L. 

Oct 

10  Oct ‘17 

10  Nov 

9  Nov 

-1 

Potentilla  argentea  L. 

Aug 

20  Nov  ‘37 

5  Dec 

18  Nov 

-17 

P.  canadensis  L. 

#P.  intermedia  L. 

P.  norvegica  L. 

P.  simplex  Michx. 
Potentilla  recta  L. 

Prunella  vulgaris  L. 
Ranunculus  acris  L. 

R.  repens  L. 

Raphanus  raphanistrum  L. 
Rubus  ideaus  L. 

Rudbeckia  laciniata  L. 
Rumex  longifolius  Alph. 

de  Candolle 
#R.  obtusifolius  L. 

Salix  discolor  Muhl. 

S.  pellita  Andersson 

Senecio  jacobaea  L. 

S.  vulgaris  L. 

Silene  latifolia  Poir. 

Sinapis  alba  L. 

S.  arx’ensis  L. 

Sisymbrium  officinale  (L.)  . 
Scop 

# Solatium  dulcamara  L. 
Solidago  bicolor  L. 


June 

July 

July 

July 

July 

Summer 

Aug 

Sep 

Oct 

July 

Aug 


Oct 

Sep 

*Feb- 

May 

*May- 

June 

Sep 

Nov 

Sep 

Aug 

Oct 

Oct 

Sep 

Sep 


27  July  4  55 
21  July  ‘62 
4  Sep  ‘53 

19  Sep  ‘83 

28  Oct  ‘51 
10  Oct  ‘83 

1  Oct  ‘78 
4  Dec  ‘05 

2  Dec  ‘05 
6  Nov  ‘94 

20  July  ‘87 
20  Oct  ‘30 

20  Oct  ‘30 


24  Nov 
18  Nov 


16  Nov 


25  Nov 
20  Nov 


16  Nov 
10  Nov 


7  Oct  ‘73 

1  Nov  ‘12 
16  Nov  ‘05 
30  July  ‘71 

2  Dec  ‘05 

23  Sep  ‘90 
16  Nov  ‘06 


9  Dec 
15  Dec 
7  Nov 
14  Dec 


17  Nov 


2  Dec 
13  Nov 

15  Nov 
6  Nov 
30  Dec 
30  Dec 
6  Nov 
23  Nov 
15  Nov 


24  Nov 

24  Nov 

24  Nov 
30  Dec 
18  Nov 
3  Dec 
15  Nov 
15  Nov 


2  Dec 


90 

56 

36 

36 

26 

28 

0 

85 

-1 


68 

157 

-15 

15 

11 

-9 

15 

-17 


16 


LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  171 


Appendix  1  Continued 


Species 

Flowering 
in  Roland 
(1998) 

Latest 

herbarium 

record 

Latest 

flowering 

2001 

Latest 

flowering 

2005 

Flowering 

extension 

(days) 

S.  canadensis  L. 

Aug 

2  Dec  ‘05 

5  Dec 

3  Dec 

-2 

S .  flexicaulis  L. 

Sep 

25  Sep  ‘63 

- 

12  Nov 

43 

S .  puberula  Nutt. 

Sep 

15  Nov  ‘94 

10  Nov 

- 

- 

S.  rugosa  P.  Mill. 

Sep 

16  Nov  ‘05 

29  Nov 

1  Nov 

-28 

S.  sempervirens  L. 

Sep 

2  Dec  ‘05 

18  Nov 

.13  Nov 

-5 

Sonchus  an'ensis  L. 

Sep 

22  Oct  ‘70 

22  Nov 

3  Dec 

11 

S.  asper  L. 

Oct 

18  Oct  ‘79 

9  Nov 

3  Dec 

25 

S.  oleraceus  L. 

Oct 

3  Dec  ‘05 

15  Nov 

6  Nov 

-9 

Spergula  arvensis  L. 

Oct 

28  Oct  ‘87 

12  Dec 

14  Jan 

33 

Spergularia  marina  (L.) 

Sep 

5  Oct  ‘28 

12  Dec 

30  Dec 

18 

Griseb. 

Spiraea  latifolia  (Ait.)  Borkh.  Aug 

5  Oct  ‘01 

w 

15  Nov 

41 

Stellaria  graminea  L. 

Oct 

16  Sep  ‘60 

-  | 

24  Nov 

24 

S.  media  (L.)  Cirillo 

Nov 

11  Sep  ‘52 

12  Dec 

21  Jan 

40 

Sueda  maritima  (L.)  Dumort.)  Sep 

3  Oct  ‘80 

- 

3  Nov 

31 

Symphoricarpos  albus  (L.) 

7 

15  July  ‘55 

- 

22  Nov 

131 

Blake 

Tanacetum  vulgare  L. 

Aug 

5  Nov  ‘12 

12  Dec 

3  Dec 

-9 

Taraxacum  officinale  (L.) 

June 

23  Sep  ‘95 

15  Dec 

21  Jan 

37 

Weber 

Thlaspi  arxense  L. 

Sep 

29  Aug  ‘36 

12  Dec 

21  Jan 

40 

#Tliymus  serpyllum  L. 

Aug 

4  Sep  ‘64 

15  Nov 

- 

- 

Tragopogon  pratensis  L. 

Aug 

2  Dec  ‘05 

7  Dec 

1  Dec 

-6 

#Trifolium  hybridum  L. 

? 

10  Sep  ‘25 

5  Nov 

- 

93 

Trifolium  pratense  L. 

Sep 

16  Nov  ‘05 

12  Dec 

3  Dec 

-9 

T.  repens  L. 

7 

20  Oct  ‘30 

18  Nov 

18  Nov 

0 

Verbascum  thapsus  L. 

Sep 

16  Nov  ‘05 

- 

3  Dec 

17 

Veronica  agrestis  L. 

Sep 

14  July  ‘48 

» 

29  Nov 

60 

V.  longifolia  L. 

Aug 

2  Sep  *48 

* 

23  Nov 

83 

V.  officinalis  L. 

Aug 

20  Nov  ‘94 

- 

3  Dec 

13 

V.  persica  Poir. 

Sep 

7  Sep  ‘51 

28  Nov 

21  Jan 

54 

Vicia  cracca  L 

Aug 

16  Nov  ‘05 

27  Nov 

3  Dec 

6 

V.  sepium  L. 

July 

26  June ‘00 

- 

1  Nov 

94 

V.  villosa  L. 

Sep 

12  Oct  ‘27 

- 

3  Nov 

22 

#Viola  cucullata  Aiton 

July 

14  Sep  ‘51 

10  Nov 

- 

- 

V.  tricolor  L. 

Nov 

13  Oct  ‘44 

5  Dec 

21  Jan 

47 

172 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


Appendix  2  List  of  species  and  numbers  occurring  at  collection  sites  from  November  2005 
to  January  2006  in  Antigonish  County.  Values  indicate  the  number  of  different 
sites  where  each  species  was  found  in  flower  during  that  ten-day  period.  No 
species  were  found  in  flower  following  January  21st. 

Species  Nov  Nov  Nov  Dec  Dec  Dec  Jan  Jan  Jan 

1-10  11-20  21-30  1-10  11-20  21-31  1-10  11-20  21 


Achillea  millefolium  16 

Allium  schoenoprasum  1 

Ambrosia  artemisiifolia 
Anaphalis  margaritacea  2 
Anthemis  tinctoria 


Arctium  minus  1 

Aster  ciliolatus  2 

A.  cordifolius  6 

A.  later iflorus  2 

A.  novae-angliae  3 

A.  novi-belgii  10 

A.  p  unice  us  5 

A.umbellatus  1 

Berteroa  incana  1 

Bidens  connata  1 

Brassica  nigra  1 

Campanula  3 

rapunculoides 


Capsella  bursa-pastor  is  5 
Cardamine  pensylvanica  1 


Centaurea  nigra  5 

Cerastium  vulgatum  2 

Chenopodium  album  4 

C.  glaucum  1 

Chenorrhinum  minus 
Chrysanthemum  4 

leucanthemum 
Cichorium  intybus 
Cirsium  arvense  3 

C.  palustre  2 

C.  vulgare  1 

Cornus  sericea  2 

Coronilla  varia  1 

Daucus  carota  2 1 

Echinocystis  lobata  3 

Echium  vulgare  2 

Epigaea  repens 
Erigeron  annuus  15 

E.  philadelphicus  2 

E.  strigosus  1 

Erucastrum  gallicum  1 

Erysimum  cheiranthoides  5 

Euphorbia  helioscopia  2 

Euphrasia  officinalis  3 

Euthamnia  graminifolia  1 


15  12  7 

1  -  1 

3  1 

1  1  1 

1 

3  3  2 

2  1 

2  2  2 

14  10  6 

1 


9  12  8 

1111 

3 

12  7  7  - 

6  2  1 

1  1 

1 

4  1 
1 

3 


1  1 
1 

18  10  2 

1 


12  6 


111- 
9  10  6  - 

3  4  4  1 


12  2  1 


6  4  8  1 

11  11 

2  2  3  1 


1 

4  2  - 

11  11 


LATE  BLOOMING  OF  PLANTS  FROM  NORTHERN  NOVA  SCOTIA  173 


Appendix  2  Continued 


Species  Nov  Nov  Nov  Dec  Dec  Dec  Jan  Jan  Jan 

1-10  11-20  21-30  1-10  11-20  21-31  1-10  11-20  21 


Fragaria  vesea 
F.  virginiana 
Fumaria  officinalis 
Galeopsis  tetrahit 
Galium  mollugo 
Glechoma  hederacea 
Hesperis  matronalis 
Hieracium  aurantiacum 
H.  lachenalii 
H.  paniculatum 
FI.  piloselloides 
Hypericum  perforatum 
Lathyrus  pratensis 
Leontodon  autumnalis 
Lepidium  campestre 

L.  virginicum 
Linaria  vulgaris 
Lupinus  polyphyllus 
Malva  moschata 

M.  neglecta 
Matricaria  maritima 
M.  matricarioides 
Medicago  lupulina 
M.  sativa 
Melilotus  alba 

M.  officinalis 
Myosotis  laxa 
M.  scorpioides 
Oenothera  biennis 

O. xalis  dillenii 
Pastinaca  sativa 
Physalis  heterophylla 
Plantago  lanceolata 
Polygonum  arenastrum 

P.  aviculare 

P.  convolvulus 
P.  cuspidatum 
P.  hydropiper 
P.  lapathifolium 
P.  pensylvanicum 
P.  persicaria 
P.  sagittatum 
Potent  ilia  argentea 
P.  norvegica 
P.  simplex 
Prunella  vulgaris 
Ranunculus  acris 
R.  re  pens 

Raphanus  raphanistrum 


1 

3  1 

2  2  3  3 

3  3  3  4 

13  2- 

1  -  -  - 

111- 

1 

3  1-1 

1  1  -  - 

1 

3  -  -  - 

1  -  -  - 

12  20  18  13 

2  2  4  3 

1  2  -  - 

14  16  1 

2  1  -  - 

112  1 

1 

10  7  8  4 

2  6  4  4 

9  2  -  - 

1  -  -  - 

14  9  3  1 

3  1 

3  1  -  - 

1  -  -  - 

15  13  4 

1  -  -  - 

3  8  5  2 

1 

3  1  -  - 

3  3  14 

1 

3  2 

1 

1  1 

2 
1 

7  7 

3  -  -  - 

2  2-- 

1 

1  2  - 

6  3 

5  -  -  - 

2  7-1 

5  9  10  5 


1 


1 

1 


1  1 


5  2 


1  1 

2  2 


1 

3  2 


1 


1 


2 

2 


1 


1 


174 


GARBARY,  FERRIER  AND  TAYLOR 


Appendix  2  Continued 


Species 

Nov 

1-10 

Nov 

11-20 

Nov 

21-30 

Dec 

1-10 

Dec 

11-20 

Dec  Jan 
21-31  1-10 

Rubus  ideaus 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Rudbeckia  laciniata 

1 

1 

2 

Rutnex  longifolius 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1  1 

Salix  discolor 

- 

“ 

S.  pellita 

- 

- 

1 

1 

- 

1 

Senecio  jacobaea 

9 

10 

2 

1 

3  1 

S.  vulgaris 

Silene  latifolia 

9 

7 

1 

11 

8 

S.  vulgaris 

1 

“ 

- 

1 

Sinapis  alba 

1 

1 

- 

S.  arvensis 

1 

3 

2 

4 

' 

Sisymbrium  officinale 

- 

1 

- 

” 

Solidago  bicolor 

2 

1 

- 

“ 

— 

S.  canadensis 

20 

14 

12 

8 

S.flexicaulis 

- 

1 

- 

- 

" 

S.  puberula 

1 

“ 

“ 

“ 

S. rugosa 

3 

“ 

S.  sempervirens 

1 

1 

- 

“  ^ 

Sonchus  arvensis 

13 

21 

6 

2 

“ 

" 

S.  asper 

1 

- 

- 

- 

“ 

—  — 

S.  oleraceus 

3 

- 

- 

- 

—  — 

Spergula  arvensis 

3 

2 

2 

3 

- 

1  1 

Spergularia  marina 

1 

- 

- 

1 

2 

Spiraea  latifolia 

2 

2 

- 

- 

- 

“ 

Stellaria  graminea 

1 

3 

1 

1 

- 

-  - 

S.  media 

5 

1 

4 

5 

1 

2  3 

Suaeda  maritima 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Symphoricarpos  albus 

1 

2 

1 

- 

- 

- 

Tanacetum  vulgare 

3 

2 

2 

3 

- 

- 

Taraxacum  officinale 

13 

16 

14 

11 

1 

5  5 

Thlaspi  arvense 

- 

3 

2 

2 

1 

1  3 

Tragopogon  pratensis 

21 

5 

3 

1 

- 

- 

Trifolium  pratense 

10 

14 

8 

3 

- 

- 

T.  repens 

13 

7 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Verbascum  thapsus 

2 

1 

h 

1 

- 

- 

Veronica  agrestis 

- 

1 

1 

- 

- 

- 

V.  longifolia 

- 

1 

1 

- 

- 

- 

V.  officinalis 

4 

- 

- 

2 

- 

- 

V.  persica 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Vicia  cracca 

3 

6 

2 

1 

- 

- 

V.  sepium 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

V.  villosa 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Viola  tricolor 

2 

2 

3 

4 

2 

2  2 

458  408  236  161 

21  21  18  14 


Jan  Jan 
11-20  21 


1  1 
1  1 

1 


1 

1 

4  2 


7  1 

2  1 


1  1 


2 


1 


Number  of  records 
Number  of  sites 


14  48  34 
3  16  10 


46  11 
18  7 


Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  (2011) 
Volume  46,  Part  2,  pp.  175-187 


THE  CRYSTAL  STRUCTURE  AND  QUANTUM 
MECHANICAL  TREATMENT  OF  THE 
ANTI-CANCER  AGENT  FLAVOPIRIDOL 
(HYDROCHLORIDE)  AND  THE  CHROMONE 
ALKALOID  ROHITUKINE 

J.  WILSON  QUAIL1  and  ROBERTA.  GOSSAGE2* 

1  Saskatchewan  Structural  Sciences  Centre,  University  of  Saskatchewan, 
110  Science  Place,  Saskatoon,  Saskatchewan  S7N  5C9 
2  Department  of  Chemistry  &  Biology,  Ryerson  University, 

350  Victoria  Street,  Toronto,  Ontario  M5B  2K3 


ABSTRACT 

The  characterisation  of  the  solid-state  crystal  structure  of  the  hydrochloric 
acid  salt  of  anti-cancer  agent  Flavopiridol  ( i.e .,  (-)-2-(2-chlorophenyl)- 
5,7-dihydroxy-8-[(3S,4P)-3-hydroxy-l  -methyl-4-piperidinyl]-4//-l- 
benzopyran-4-one)  is  described.  The  title  compound  forms  meta-stable 
X-ray  quality  crystals  by  slow  evaporation  of  solutions  of  the  material  in 
aqueous  methanol.  The  crystalline  unit  cell  contains  two  organic  cations, 
two  formal  chloride  counterions  and  two  molecules  of  methanol,  one  of 
which  is  replaced  in  20%  occupancy  by  a  water  molecule.  The  crystal 
form  is  of  space  group  PI  with  cell  parameters  a  =  7.2014(10)  A,  b  = 
12.0094(9)  A,  c  =  12.6581(14)  A,  a  =  89.146(4)°,  (3  =  89.788(6)°  and  y 
=  82.180(4)°.  The  unit  cell  volume  is  1084. 4(2) A3.  The  general  structural 
features  of  individual  (gas-phase)  molecules  of  protonated  Flavopiridol  and 
the  naturally  occurring  2-methyl- [AH] -chromen-4-one  analogue  Rohitukine 
have  been  calculated  by  application  of  Density  Functional  Theory  (dft) 
at  the  b3lyp/6-31g*  level  of  sophistication.  These  results  are  compared  to 
the  reported  solid-state  data  of  these  two  biologically  relevant  flavanoids. 


INTRODUCTION 

Flavanoids  are  a  class  of  natural  products  that  are  widely  distributed 
in  the  biosphere,  particularly  in  the  plant  kingdom  (Harborne  &  Mabry, 
1982),  as  primarily  secondary  metabolites.  Many  flavanoids  are,  not 
surprisingly,  biologically  active  and  hence  have  been  the  subject  ot 
intense  scrutiny  by  natural  products  chemists  and  the  pharmaceutical 
industry  (Eisnor  et  al.,  2006;  Joule  et  al.,  1995).  These  investigations 


*  Author  to  whom  correspondence  should  be  addressed:  gossage@ryerson.ca 


176 


QUAIL  AND  GOSSAGE 


have  led  to  the  identification  of  a  vast  number  of  potential  new  sources 
of  phytochemicals  that  have  been  used  or  are  under  development  as 
both  nutraceuticals  and/or  chemotherapy  agents.  In  addition,  novel 
structural  motifs  derived  from  natural  products  often  serve  as  starting 
points  or  “leads”  for  compounds  that  are  investigated  for  their  clinical 
potential .  Many  years  ago ,  the  flavanoid  compound  dubbed  Rohitukine 
(1:  Scheme  1),  which  contains  a  2-methyl- [4H] -chromen-4-one  frag- 


Scheme  1  Schematic  representations  of  Rohitukine  (1)  and  Flavopiridol  (2) .  Below  these 
pictorials  are  the  parent  structures  of  2-methyl- [4H] -chromen-4-one  and  flavone: 
left  and  right,  respectively. 


ment,  was  isolated  (Harmon  et  al.,  1979)  from  the  Asian  plant  Amoora 
rohituka  (Syn.  Aphanamixis  polystachya)  (meliaceae).  This  alkaloid 
incorporates  both  the  aforementioned  chromone  skeleton,  a  common 
organic  motif  (Joule  et  al.,  1995),  and  an  unusual  modified  piperidinyl 
ring  system.  Rohitukine  itself  displays  a  range  of  biological  activities 
including  its  ability  to  modulate  immune  response  systems  and  act  as 
an  anti-inflammatory  agent  (Naik  et  al.,  1998;  Sedlacek  et  al.,  1996). 
However,  it  is  most  noteworthy  for  its  potent  anti-cancer  potential. 
Large  quantities  of  1  can  be  obtained  from  Dysoxylum  binectariferum 
(Yang  et  al.,  2004;  Mohanakumara  et  al.,  2010),  which  is  currently 
the  primary  natural  source  of  this  chromone,  although  two  species  of 
Schumanniophyton  also  produce  1  (Houghton,  2002;  Houghton  & 
Hairong,  1987;  Houghton  &  Woldemariam,  1993).  Chemical  modi¬ 
fication  ot  the  basic  structure  of  1  has  led  to  the  synthesis  of  a  more 
biologically  active  flavone  (Harborne  &  Mabry,  1982)  derivative 
given  the  name  Flavopiridol  (2:  2-[2-chlorophenyl]-5,7-dihydroxy- 


CRYSTAL  STRUCTURE 


177 


8-[{3S,4/?}-3-hydroxy-l-methyl-4-piperidinyl]-4//-l-benzopyran-4- 
one:  Scheme  1).  This  compound  has  already  entered  Phase  III  clinical 
trials  for  applications  against  a  number  of  classes  of  cancer  including 
breast,  colon  and  lung  cancers,  leukaemia  and  cancers  of  the  head  and 
neck  (Billard  et  al.,  2003;  Carlson  et  al.,  1996;  Fischer  &  Lane,  2000; 
Kitada  et  al.,  2000;  Lin  &  Porcu,  2004;  Patel  et  al.,  1998;  Wu  et  al., 
2002).  The  mode(s)  of  action  of  2  have  been  identified  as  primarily 
due  to  the  ability  of  the  compound  to  act  as  a  selective  kinase  inhibi¬ 
tor  and  thus  it  represents  the  first  such  inhibitor  to  enter  clinical  trials 
(Bishop  et  al.,  2001;  Byrd  et  al.,  1998;  Carlson  et  al.,  1996;  Fabbro 
et  al.,  2002;  Filigueira  et  al.,  1996  &  2002;  Hu  we  et  al.,  2003;  Kitada 
et  al.,  2000;  Konig  et  al.,  1997;  Krystof  &  Strnad,  2003;  Noble  et  al., 
2004;  Patel  et  al.,  1998;  Pepper  et  al.,  2003;  Sedlacek,  2001;  Sedlacek 
et  al.,  1996;  Senderowicz  et  al.,  1999;  Senderowicz  &  Sausville,  2000; 
Takada  &  Aggarwal,  2004;  Wang  &  Ren,  2010).  A  brief  report  of  the 
characterisation  of  1 ,  via  single  crystal  X-ray  diffraction  methods,  has 
been  previously  reported  (Yang  et  al.,  2003)  but  details  of  the  structure 
(bond  lengths,  bond  angles,  etc.)  were  not  disclosed.  Flavopiridol  has 
not  been  investigated  in  this  way.  Neither  1  nor  2  have  been  structur¬ 
ally  examined  from  a  theoretical  perspective  by  quantum  mechanical 
methods.  In  this  report,  dedicated  to  the  150th  anniversary  of  the  Nova 
Scotian  Institute  of  Science,  we  disclose  the  characterisation  of  the 
hydrochloric  acid  salt  of  2  by  X-ray  diffraction  methods  and  compare 
the  solid-state  structures  of  both  1  and  2  to  those  obtained  by  examining 
the  molecules  via  quantum  mechanical  methods ,  specifically  employing 
Density  Functional  Theory  (dft)  at  the  b3lyp/6-31g*  level  of  theory 
(Goodman,  1998;  Koch  &  Holthausen,  2002;  Sholl  &  Steckel,  2009). 

METHODS 

Flavopiridol  hydrochloric  acid  salt  ( i.e.,Alvocidib )  was  kindly  sup¬ 
plied  to  the  authors  by  Sanofi-Aventis,  Inc.  Caution!  Flavopiridol  is  a 
potent  biologically  active  agent  and  therefore  should  only  be  handled 
by  qualified  personnel  using  strict  laboratory  safety  protocols.  Crystals 
of  the  material  were  obtained  by  dissolving  approximately  25  mg  of 
the  compound  in  methanol  (~10  mL)  and  then  allowing  the  resulting 
solution,  contained  in  a  small  vial,  to  slowly  evaporate  under  ambient 
conditions.  Yellow  rectangular  shaped  crystals  were  obtained  after  a 
period  of  about  7  days.  These  meta-stable  crystals  remain  intact  for  a 


178 


QUAIL  AND  GOSSAGE 


period  of  about  6  weeks  before  returning  to  a  powder  form  of  (presum¬ 
ably)  solvent-free  material. 

X-ray  diffraction  data  was  collected  at  -100°C  on  a  Nonius  Kappa 
CCD  diffractometer,  using  the  collect  program  (Nonius,  1998).  Cell 
refinement  and  data  reductions  used  the  programs  denzo  and  scalepack 
(Otwinowski  &  Minor,  1997).  sir97  (Altomare  et  al.,  1999)  was  used 
to  solve  the  structure  and  shelxl97  (Sheldrick,  2008)  was  used  to 
refine  the  structure.  Ortep-3  for  Windows  (Farrugia,  1997)  was  used 
for  molecular  graphics  (Figure  1)  and  platon  (Spek,  2001)  was  used 
to  prepare  material  for  publication.  H  atoms  were  placed  in  calculated 
positions  with  Ujso  constrained  to  be  1 .2  times  U eq  of  the  carrier  atom 
for  all  hydrogen  atoms.  The  structure  solution  has  two  cations  and  two 
chloride  ions  in  the  asymmetric  unit.  In  addition,  there  are  two  solvent 
methanol  molecules  in  the  asymmetric  unit,  one  with  disorder.  Twenty 
percent  of  one  methanol  is  replaced  by  a  water  molecule.  Modelling 
the  disorder  proved  to  be  difficult  because  of  the  strong  coupling  be¬ 
tween  the  occupancy  factors  and  the  thermal  factors.  In  the  end,  the 
occupancy  of  water  was  set  at  0.20  and  the  methanol  at  0.80  to  stabilize 
the  refinement.  The  only  b  alert  is  for  possible  higher  symmetry.  This 
test  does  not  consider  the  disordered  atoms.  Since  one  methanol  is 
disordered  with  a  water  molecule  and  the  other  is  not,  higher  symme¬ 
try  is  not  possible.  Crystallographic  data  (excluding  structure  factors) 
have  been  deposited  in  the  Cambridge  Crystallographic  Data  Centre 
as  Supplementary  publication  No.  ccdc  832180.  Copies  of  these  data 
can  be  obtained  free  of  charge  on  application  to  ccdc,  12  Union  Road, 
Cambridge  CB2  1EZ,  U.K.  (fax:  +44  1223  336  033;  e-mail:  deposit@ 
ccdc.cam.ac.uk). 

Density  Functional  Theory  was  used  for  the  quantum  mechanical 
calculations  employing  the  b3lyp/6-31g*  level  of  theory  (Becke,  1993; 
Lee  et  al.,  1988);  these  data  were  obtained  by  using  the  spartan  10.0 
(Spartan  ,2010)  suite  of  programs .  These  calculations  included  neutral  1 
and  the  cationic  A-protonated  form  of  Flavopiridol  (i.e.,  [2+H]+).  Zero 
point  energy  calculations  were  performed  on  the  idealised  structures 
to  ensure  that  the  data  reflect  true  minima  along  the  potential  energy 
suilace  and  hence  no  negative  IR  or  Raman  frequencies  were  calcu¬ 
lated.  Details  ot  these  data  (including  .mol  files)  are  available  from 
the  authors  on  request. 


CRYSTAL  STRUCTURE 


179 


Fig  1  ORTEP  representation  of  the  two  independent  cations  of  [2+H]  found  in  the  unit 
cell;  cation  A  (left)  and  cation  B  (right). 


RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

The  general  crystal  data  parameters  for  the  HC1  salt  of  2  (i.e.,  [2+H] 
Cl)  can  be  found  in  Table  1 .  A  list  of  selected  bond  lengths,  bond  and 
torsion  angles  for  [2+H]Cl,  in  addition  to  the  computationally  derived 
gas  phase  values  of  both  1  and  cationic  [2+H]+ ,  are  displayed  in  Table  2 . 
Molecular  representations  (ortep)  of  the  two  independent  [2+H]  cations 
found  within  the  unit  cell  are  shown  in  Figure  1 .  In  many  respects,  the 
solid-state  structure  of  the  cation  of  2  is  very  similar  to  that  described 
for  other  structurally  characterised  flavones  with  quite  typical  bond 
lengths  and  angles,  specifically  with  respect  to  the  benzopyrone  and 
aromatic  ring  systems  (Allen  et  ah,  1987).  5-Hydroxyflavones,  such 
as  the  title  material,  typically  display  intra-molecular  //-bonding  be¬ 
tween  the  H  atom  on  ring  position-5  and  the  carbonyl  O-atom  (Chou 
et  al.,  2002;  Krishnaiah  et  al.,  2005;  Parvez  et  al.,  2001;  Shoja  1989, 
1990;  Watson  et  al.,  1991)  and  this  certainly  appears  to  be  evident 
here  (09H*»*0  =  1 .856A).  The  benzopyrone  ring  is  essentially  planar 
with  a  torsion  angle  of  less  than  3° ,  similar  to  other  flavones  that  have 
been  previously  reported  ( e.g .,  Krishnaiah  et  al.,  2005)  and  this  also 
appears  to  be  the  case  for  Rohitukine  (Yang  et  al.,  2003).  For  simplic¬ 
ity,  direct  comparisons  will  be  noted  for  unit  cell  Molecule  A  only. 
Details  of  Molecule  B  can  be  found  in  the  appropriate  .cif  file  and/or 
details  noted  in  Table  2.  The  overall  crystal  motif  reveals  considerable 


180 


QUAIL  AND  GOSSAGE 


Table  1  General  crystal  data  for  compound  (2+HCl)2*(MeOH)1  g0*(H2O)020 


Parameter: 

(2+HCl)2*(MeOH)IJi0*(H1O)#^0 

Formula 

c4JKh49Mn2o12ci4 

fw 

937.85 

Crystal  size  (mm) 

0.25  x  0.20x0.13 

a  (A) 

7.2014(10) 

b  (A) 

12.0094(9) 

c(A) 

12.6581(14) 

o(°) 

89.146(4) 

PO 

89.788(6) 

Y  (°) 

82.180(4) 

V(A3) 

1084.4(2) 

Dcaic(g/Cm3) 

1.436 

Crystal  system;  space  group 

Triclinic;  PI 

Z 

1 

F(000) 

490.4 

T  (K) 

173(2) 

Absorption  coefficient  (mm1) 

0.339 

20  range  (°) 

2.86-27.63 

Limiting  indices 

-9  <  h  <  +9;  -15  <  k  <  +15;  -16  <  1  <  +16 

Reflections  collected 

15962 

Reflections  unique 

8544  [R(int)  =  0.0414] 

Reflections  I  >  2o(I) 

8544 

Restraints  /  Parameters 

3/571 

GOF  on  F 

1.055 

Final  R  indices  I  >  2o(I) 

R,  =  0.0422;  wR2  =  0.0911 

R  indices  (all  data) 

R,  =  0.0522;  wR,  =  0.0987 

Q  (e-A3) 

v  min, max  v  ' 

0.269,-0.284 

Abs.  Structure  Parameter 

-0.01(4) 

MA) 

0.71073  Mo  Ka 

CRYSTAL  STRUCTURE 


181 


Table  2  Selected  bond  lengths  (A),  bond  and  torsion  angles  (°)  measured  for 
[Z+HClLHMeOH),  g0*(H2O)020  and  calculated  (DFT:  b3lyp/6-31g*)  for  1  and 
[2+H]+.  Estimated  standard  deviations  are  shown  in  parentheses. 


Value 

1  (calc.) 

[2+H]+.(calc.) 

[2+H]Cl*(observed)a 

c=o  (A) 

1.251 

1.243 

1.263(4);  1.269(3) 

c=c  (A) 

1.351 

1.346 

1 .343(4);  1 .358(4) 

C  ,  -OH  (A) 

aromatic  v  7 

1.339;  1.359 

1.330;  1.363 

1.360(3);  1.364(4) 
1.358(3);  1.368(3) 

c-ci  (A) 

n/a 

1.761 

1.737(3);  1.741(3) 

c=c-ch3  (°) 

126.2 

n/a 

n/a 

c=c-cphenyl  n 

n/a 

124.84 

125.4(3);  125.6(3) 

C-CH-CH-OH  (°) 

56.13 

-77.10 

-66.4(3);  -63.6(4) 

OC-C-CC1  (°) 

n/a 

106.42 

-143.0(3);  141.3(3) 

a  Entries  for  Molecule  A  (see  text)  are  listed  first. 


intermolecular //-bonding  aspects,  specifically  the  7-OH  group  with  a 
formal  chloride  anion  (013H*»*C1  =  2. 23 A).  The  N-H  functionality  is 
also  in  close  proximity  to  one  of  the  lattice  methanol  O  atoms  (N 1 8H»*«0 
=  1 .96 A).  The  chlorophenyl  group  is  oriented  out  of  the  plane  of  the 
benzopyrone  ring  by  about  4 1  ° ;  a  property  which  decreases  the  contact 
distance  between  the  Cl  atom  and  the  H  on  piperidinyl  ring  position 
3’  (C17H##*C1  =  2.86A).  Other  flavones  (Hall  et  al.,  2001;  Waller  et 
al.,  2005),  including  2’ -substituted  examples,  also  display  such  large 
angles  (Chou  et  al.,  2002;  Shoja,  1989;  Ting  et  al.,  1972)  and  indeed  a 
value  of  62°  has  been  reported  for  6-hydroxy-2’ ,3’-dimethoxyflavone 
(Wallet  et  al.,  1993). 

Flavopiridol  hydrochloride  obviously  demonstrates  considerable 
inter-  and  intra-molecular  //-bonding,  as  detailed  above,  in  the  solid- 
state.  The  obvious  low  volatility  of  this  salt  negates  one’s  ability  to 
also  examine  this  material  in  the  gas-phase  to  evaluate  any  //-bonding 
facets.  However,  the  examination  of  compounds  from  a  theoretical 
perspective  allows  one  to  probe  the  structural  aspects  of  such  species 
in  the  hypothetical  gas-phase  (i.e.,  a  single  isolated  molecule).  Of  the 
plethora  of  computational  methods  that  can  be  used  in  this  regard, 
Density  Functional  Theory  (dft)  has  become  a  widely  employed  and 
powerful  tool  to  examine  molecules  and  molecular  fragments  from  a 
theoretical  point  of  view  in  the  gas-phase,  solution  and  indeed  even 
in  network  solids  (Goodman,  1998;  Koch  &  Holthausen,  2002;  Sholl 


182 


QUAIL  AND  GOSSAGE 


&  Steckel,  2009).  An  examination  of  both  1  and  [2+H]+  was  therefore 
carried  out  using  dft  to  examine  the  overall  structural  properties  and 
attempt  to  draw  some  conclusions  about  possible  gas-phase  structures 
of  these  two  species.  Selected  calculated  bond  lengths  and  bond  and 
torsion  angles  can  be  found  in  Table  2.  As  expected  (Chojnacka  et  al., 
2011),  the  dft  calculations  do  closely  parallel  the  solid-state  struc¬ 
tures  of  the  two  materials.  As  details  of  the  bond  lengths  and  angles 
for  the  crystalline  state  of  1  do  not  appear  in  the  literature  (Yang  et 
al.,  2003),  a  comparison  of  calculated  1  to  that  of  [2+H]+  depicts  a 
reasonable  structural  similarity  between  the  two  species  (Table  2). 
As  inter-molecular  //-bonding  cannot  be  involved  here,  this  restricts 
the  attractive  forces  to  those  of  an  intra-molecular  nature.  A  skeletal 
diagram  indicating  the  calculated  //-bonding  aspects  (dashed  line 
‘bonds’)  is  shown  in  Scheme  2.  The  calculated  Flavopiridol  cation 
displays  lesser  rotation  of  the  aromatic  group  with  respect  to  that  of  the 
benzopyrone  ring  (calc.  106°;  found  141°)  and  this  serves  to  facilitate 
//-bonding  between  the  3’ -OH  (piperdinyl)  group  and  the  chlorine 
atom  (calc.  017H**«C1  =  2. 65 A).  Obviously,  this  latter  result  causes 
considerable  rotation  of  the  piperdinyl  ring  and  this  again  strengthens 
intra-molecular //-bonding,  in  this  case  between  the  same  -OH  and  the 
benzopyrone  ether  O  atom  (017H**»07  =  2. 05 A).  These  latter  aspects 
do  not  appear  for  1  but  instead  strong  interactions  between  the  piperonyl 
OH  and  the  benzopyrone  7 ’-OH  position  is  observed  (017H»*#0  = 
1 .88  A:  Table  2;  Scheme  2).  Not  surprisingly,  both  calculated  structures 
include  close  contacts  between  the  H  atom  on  ring  position-5  and  the 


H 

O  O 


m 


A 


O  D 


|2+H|+ 


Scheme  -  Schematic  representation  of  the  H-bonds  (dashed  lines)  calculated  for  gas- 
phase  1  and  the  Flavopiridol  cation  ([2+H]+).  In  both  cases,  stereochemical 
bond  descriptors  have  been  removed  for  clarity. 


CRYSTAL  STRUCTURE 


183 


carbonyl  O-atom  although  a  slight  over  estimation  of  this  strength  is 
noted  (calc .  0 1 1  H"*09  =  1 .69 A  for  1  and  1 .70  A  for  [2+H]+) .  The  C=0 
(1:  1.25A;  2:  1.24A)  and  C-Cl  bonds  ([2+H]+)  are  well-estimated  in 
both  cases  (2:  C-Cl  =  1.76A).  The  calculated  UV- Visible  absorptions 
are  also  estimated  with  fair  accuracy  for  both  1  (k  [calc.]:  241  nm; 
Xmax:  [observed]:  252  nm)  and  [2+H]Cl  (^max  [calc.]:  247  nm;  A,max: 
[observed:  aqueous]:  269  nm),  despite  the  molecular  rearrangements 
noted  above  for  gas-phase  calculations  (Sedlacek  et  al.,  1996;  Tang 
et  al.,  2004;  Yang  et  al.,  2009). 

CONCLUSIONS 

The  solid-state  crystal  structure  of  Flavopiridol  hydrochloride,  in 
the  form  of  meta-stable  crystals  containing  both  methanol  and  water 
molecules,  has  been  detailed.  This  compound  has  features  similar  to 
other  related  flavanoids  that  have  been  characterised  in  the  solid-state 
such  as  Rohitukine.  This  latter  material  and  the  cationic  component 
of  the  title  compound  have  been  further  examined  from  a  theoretical 
perspective  by  Density  Functional  Theory  and  these  results  suggest 
a  modified  pattern  of  //-bonding  for  individual  gas-phase  molecules. 

Acknowledgements  The  author  is  indebted  to  Ryerson  University 
for  support  of  this  work.  Additional  funding  for  the  author  has  been 
provided  by  nserc  (Canada)  in  the  form  of  a  Discovery  Grant.  Prof. 
D.-M.  Ren  (, Shandong  University )  is  thanked  for  providing  a  reprint 
of  his  publication.  Prof.  Daniel  A.  Foucher  ( Ryerson  University)  is 
acknowledged  for  his  critical  review  of  this  manuscript,  as  well  as 
anonymous  journal  referees. 

REFERENCES 

Allen,  F.H.,  Kennard,  O.,  Watson,  D.G.,  Brammer,  L.,  Orpen,  A.G.,  & 
Taylor,  R.  ( 1 987)  Tables  of  bond  lengths  determined  by  X-ray  and  neutron 
diffraction.  Part  1 .  Bond  lengths  in  organic  compounds.  J Chem  Soc  Perkin 
Trans  II S1-S19. 

Altomare,  A.,  Burla,  M.C.,  Camalli,  M.,  Cascarano,  G.,  Giacovazzo,  C., 
Guagliardi,  A.,  Moliterni,  A.G.G.,  Polidori,  G.,  &  Spagna,  R.  (1999) 
sir97:  a  new  tool  for  crystal  structure  determination  and  refinement.  J  Appl 
Cryst  32:115-1 19. 

Becke,  A.D.(  1993)  Anew  mixing ofHartree-Fock  and  local  density-functional 
theories.  J  Chem  Pliys  98: 1372-1377. 


184 


QUAIL  AND  GOSSAGE 


Billard,  C.,  Kern,  C.,  Tang,  R.,  Ajchenbaum-Cybalista,  F.,  &  Kolb,  J.-P. 

(2003)  Flavopiridol  downregulates  the  expression  of  both  the  inducible  NO 
synthase  and  p27kipl  in  malignant  cells  from  B-cell  chronic  lymphocytic 
leukemia.  Leukemia  17:2435-2443. 

Bishop,  A.C.,  Buzko,  O.,  &  Shokat,  K.M.  (2001)  Magic  bullets  for  protein 
kinases.  Trends  Cell  Biol  11:167-172. 

Byrd,  J.C.,  Shinn,  C.,  Waselenko,  J.K.,  Fuchs,  EJ.,  Lehman,  T.A., 
Nguyen,  P.L.,  Flinn,  I.W.,  Diehl,  L.F.,  Sausville,  E.,  &  Grever,  M.R. 

(1998)  Flavopiridol  induces  apoptosis  in  chronic  lymphocytic  leukemia 
cells  via  activation  of  caspase-3  without  evidence  of  bcl-2  modulation  or 
dependence  on  functional  p53.  Blood  92:3804-3816. 

Carlson,  B.A.,  Dubay,  M.M.,  Sausville,  E.A.,  Brizuela,  L.,  &  Worland, 
P J.  ( 1 996)  Flavopiridol  induces  G ,  arrest  with  inhibition  of  cy clin-dependent 
kinase  (CDK)  2  and  CDK4  in  human  breast  carcinoma  cells.  Cancer  Res 
56:2973-2978. 

Chojnacka,  M.W.,  Lough,  AJ.,  Wylie,  R.S.,  &  Gossage,  R.A.  (2011) 
Piperonylic  anhydride:  isolation  and  conformational  analysis  by  X-ray 
crystallography  and  density  functional  theory  calculations.  J  Mol  Struct 
991:158-161. 

Chou,  N.H.-H.,  Parvez,  M.,  Ali,  M.S.,  Ahmed,  S.,  &  Ahmed,  W.  (2002) 
Cirsimaritin.  Acta  Cryst  E58:o285-o287. 

Eisnor,  C.E.,  Gossage,  R.A.,  &  Yadav,  P.N.  (2006)  Oxazoline  chemistry. 
Part  1 1 :  synthesis  of  natural  and  synthetic  isoflavones,  stilbenes  and  related 
species  via  C-C  bond  formation  promoted  by  a  Pd-oxazoline  complex. 
Tetrahedron  62:3395-3401 . 

Fabbro,  D.,  Ruetz,  S.,  Buchdunger,  E.,  Cowan-Jacob,  S.W.,  Fendrich, 
G.,  Liebetanz,  J.,  Mestan,  J.,  O’Reilly,  T.,  Traxler,  P.,  Chaudhuri,  B., 
Fretz,  H.,  Zimmermann,  J.,  Meyer,  T.,  Caravatti,  G.,  Furet  P.,  & 
Manley,  P.W.  (2002)  Protein  kinases  as  targets  for  anticancer  agents:  from 
inhibitors  to  useful  drugs.  Pharma  Therap  93:79-98. 

Farrugia,  LJ.  (1997)  ortep-3  for  Windows  -  a  version  of  ortep-iii  with  a 
graphical  user  interface  (gui).  J  Appl  Cryst  30:568. 

Filgueira  de  Azevedo,  Jr.,  W.,  Canduri,  F.,  Freitas  da  Silveira,  N  J.  (2002) 
Structural  basis  for  inhibition  of  cyclin-dependent  kinase  9  by  flavopiridol. 
Biochem  Biophys  Res  Commun  293:566-571. 

Filgueira  de  Azevedo,  Jr.,  W.,  Mueller-Dieckmann  H.-J.,  Schulze- 
Gahmen  U.,  Worland, PJ.,  Sausville, E.,  &  Kim, S.-H.  (1996)  Structural 
basis  for  specificity  and  potency  of  a  flavonoid  inhibitor  of  human  CDK2, 
a  cell  cycle  kinase.  Proc  Natl  Acad  Sci  USA  93:2735-2740. 

Hscher,  P.M.,  &  Lane,  D.P.  (2000)  Inhibitors  of  cyclin-dependent  kinases 
as  anti-cancer  therapeutics.  Curr  Med  Chem  7:1213-1245. 

Goodman,  J.M.  (1998)  Chemical  Applications  of  Molecular  Modelling ; 
Royal  Society  of  Chemistry:  Cambridge,  U.K. 

Hall,  BJ.,  Hanrahan,  J.R.,  Johnston,  G.A.R.,  Hambley,  T.W.,  & 
Hibbs,  D.E.  (2001)  6-Methoxyflavone.  Acta  Cryst  E57:o592-o593. 

Harborne,  J.B.,  &  Mabry,  LJ.  (1982)  The  Flavanoids:  Advances  in  Re¬ 
search',  Chapman  &  Hall:  New  York,  U.S.A.;  Ch.  10. 


CRYSTAL  STRUCTURE 


185 


Harmon,  A.D.,  Weiss,  U.,  &  Silverton,  J.V.  (1979).  The  structure  ofrohitu- 
kine ,  the  main  alkaloid  of  Amoora  rohituka  (Syn .  Aphanamixis polystachya ) 
(meliaceae).  Tetrahedron  Lett  20:721-724. 

Houghton,  PJ.  (2002)  Chromatography  of  the  chromome  and  flavonoid 
alkaloids./.  Chromatogr  A  967:75-84. 

Houghton,  PJ.  &  Hairong,  Y.  (1987)  Further  chromone  alkaloids  from 
Schumanniophyton  magnificum.  Planta  Med  262-264. 

Houghton,  PJ.  &  Woldemariam,  T.Z.  (1993)  High-performance  liquid- 
chromatographic  analysis  of  chromone  alkaloids  from  Schmanniophyton 
species.  Phytochem  Anal  4:9-13. 

Huwe,  A.,  Mazitschek,  R.,  &  Giannis,  A.  (2003)  Small  molecules  as 
inhibitors  of  cyclin-dependent  kinases.  Angew  Client  Int  Ed 42:2122-2138. 

Joule,  J.A.,  Mills,  K.,  Smith,  G.F.  (1995)  Heterocyclic  Chemistry,  3rd 
Edition',  Chapman  &  Hall:  New  York,  U.S.A.;  Ch.  9. 

Kitada,  S.,  Zapata,  J.M.,  Andreeff,  M.,  &  Reed,  J.C.  (2000)  Protein 
kinase  inhibitors  flavopiridol  and  7-hydroxy-staurosporine  down-regulate 
antiapoptosis  proteins  in  B-cell  chronic  lymphocytic  leukemia.  Blood 
96:393-397. 

Koch,  W.,  &  Holthausen,  M.C.  (2002)  A  Chemist’s  Guide  to  Density  Func¬ 
tional  Theory:  2nd  Edition,  Wiley- VCH,  Toronto. 

Konig,  A.,  Schwartz,  G.K.,  Mohammad,  R.M.,  Al-Katib,  A.,  & 
Gabrilove,  J.L.  (1997)  The  novel  cyclin-dependent  kinase  inhibitor 
flavopiridol  downregulates  bcl-2  and  induces  growth  arrest  and  apoptosis 
in  chronic  B-Cell  leukemia  lines.  Blood  90:4307-4312. 

Krishnaiah,  M.,  Kumar,  R.R.,  Kumar,  N.J.,  Gunasekar,  D.,  & 
Jayaprakasam,  B.  (2005)  5-Hydroxy-7,8,2’-trimethoxyflavone.  Acta 
Cry st  E61:o2862-o2864. 

Krystof,  V.,  &  Strnad,  M.  (2003)  Inhibitory  cyklin-dependentmch  kinas. 
Chem  Listy  95:295-300. 

Lee,  C.,  Yang,  W.,  &  Parr,  R.G.  (1988).  Development  of  the  Colle-Salvetti 
correlation-energy  formula  into  a  functional  of  the  electron  density.  Phys 
Rev  B  37:785-789. 

Lin,  T.S.,  &  Porcu,  P.  (2004)  Flavopiridol:  where  do  we  stand  in  chronic 
lymphocytic  leukemia?  Leukemia  18:243-246. 

Mohanakumara,  P.,  Sreejayan,  N.,  Priti,  V.,  Ramesha,  B.T.,Ravi- 
kanth,G.,Ganeshaiah,K.N.,Vasudeva,R., Mohan,  J.,Santhoshkumar, 
T.R.,  Mishra,  P.D.,  Ram,  V.,  &  Shaanker,  R.U.  (2010)  Dysoxylum 
binectariferum  Hook.f  (Meliaceae), a  rich  source  of  rohitukine.  Fitoterapia 
81:145-148. 

Naik,  R.G.,  Kattige,  S.L.,  Bhat,  S.V.,  Alreja,  B.,  de  Souza,  NJ.,  & 

Rupp,  R.H.  (1988)  An  anti-inflammatory  cum  immunomodulatory 
piperidinylbenzopyranone  from  Dysoxlum  binectariferum :  isolation, 
structure  and  total  synthesis.  Tetrahedron  44:2081-2086. 

Noble,  M.E.M.,  Endicott,  J.A.  &  Johnson,  L.N.  (2004)  Protein  kinase 
inhibitors:  insights  into  drug  design  from  structure.  Science  303: 1 800- 1 805 . 

Nonius,  b.v.  (1998)  collect.  Nonius,  b.v.,  Delft,  The  Netherlands. 


186 


QUAIL  AND  GOSSAGE 


Otwinowski,  Z.,  &  Minor,  W.  (1997)  Processing  X-ray  diffraction  data 
collected  in  oscillation  mode.  Macromolecular  Crystallography:  Part  A  in 
Methods  in  Enzyniology  (Eds.:  Carter,  C.  W.,  &  Sweet,  R.  M .)  276:307-326. 

Parvez,  M.,  Riaz,  M.,  &  Malik,  A.  (2001)  Eupatorin.  Acta  Cryst 
E57:o289-o291. 

Patel  V.,  Senderowicz,  A.M.,  Pinto,  Jr.,  D.,  Igishi,  T.,  Raffield,  M., 
Quintanilla-Martinez,  L.,  Ensley,  J.F.,  Sausville,  E.A.  &  Gutkind,  J.S. 

(1998)  Flavopiridol ,  a  novel  cyclin-dependent  kinase  inhibitor,  suppresses  the 
growth  of  head  and  neck  squamous  cell  carcinomas  by  inducing  apoptosis. 
J  Clin  Invest  102:1674-1681. 

Pepper,  C.,  Thomas,  A.,  Fegan,  C.,  Hoy  T.,  &  Bentley  P.  (2003)  Flavo¬ 
piridol  induces  apoptosis  in  B-cell  chronic  lymphocytic  leukaemia  cells 
through  a  p3  8  and  ERK  MAP  kinase-dependent  mechanism .  Leuk  Lymphoma 
44:337-342. 

Sedlacek,H.H.  (2001)  Mechanisms  of  action  of  flavopiridol.  CritRev  Oncol/ 
Hematol  38:139-170. 

Sedlacek,  H.H.,  Czech,  J.,  Naik,  R.,  Kaur,  G.,  Worland,  P.,  Losiewicz, 
M.,  Parker,  B.,  Carlson,  B.,  Smith,  A.,  Senderowicz,  A.,  &  Sausville, 

E.  (1996)  Flavopiridol  (L86  8275;  NSC  649890),  a  new  kinase  inhibitor 
for  tumor  therapy.  Int  J  Oncol  9: 1 1 43- 1 1 68 . 

Senderowicz,  A.M.  (1999)  Flavopiridol:  the  first  cyclin-dependent  kinase 
inhibitor  in  human  clinical  trials.  Invest  New  Drugs  17:313-320. 

Senderowicz,  A.M.,  &  Sausville,  E.A.  (2000)  Preclinical  and  clinical 
development  of  cyclin-dependent  kinase  modulators.  J  Natl  Cancer  Inst 
92:376-387. 

Sheldrick,  G.M.  (2008)  A  short  history  of  shelx.  Acta  Cryst  A64: 112-122. 

Shoja,  M.  (1989)  5-Hydroxy-7-methoxyflavone.  Acta  Cryst  C45:828-829. 

Shoja,  M.  (1990)  5-Hydroxyflavone.  Acta  Cryst  C46:5 17-519. 

Sholl,  D.S.,  &  Steckel,  J.A.  (2009)  Density  Functional  Theory:  A  Practical 
Introduction ,  Wiley  &  Sons,  Toronto. 

Spek,  A.L.  (2001)  platon.  Utrecht  University,  The  Netherlands. 

Spartan  10.0.  (2010)  Wavefunction  Inc.,  Irvine  CA. 

Takada  Y.,  &  Aggarwal  B.B.  (2004)  Flavopiridol  inhibits  NF-kB  activation 
induced  by  various  carcinogens  and  inflammatory  agents  through  inhibition 
of  IxBa  kinase  and  p65  phosphorylation.  J  Biol  Chem  279:4750-4759. 

Ting,  H.-Y.,  Watson,  W.H.,  &  Dominguez,  X.A.  (1972)  The  molecular 
structure  of  3  ’  ,5 ,5  ’  ,6-tetramethoxy flavone , C  H  O  .  Acta  CrystB28: 1 046- 
1051.  19  18  6 

Wang,  L.-M.,  &  Ren,D.-M.  (2010)  Flavopiridol,  the  first  cyclin-dependent 
kinase  inhibitor:  recent  advances  in  combination  chemotherapy.  Mini-Rev 
Med  Chem  10:1058-1070. 

Waller,  M.P.,  Hibbs,  D.E.,  Overgaard,  J.,  Hanrahan,  J.R.,  &  Hambley, 
T.W.  (2003)  Flavone.  Acta  Cryst  E59:o767-o768. 

Wallet,  J.  C.,  Gaydou,  E.M.,  Mas,  M.,  Molins,  E.,  &  Miravitlles,  C. 

( 1 993)  2-(2,3-Dimethoxyphenyl)-6-hydroxy-4//- 1  -benzopyran-4-one 
(6-hydroxy-2 ’, 3 ’-dimethoxy flavone).  Acta  Cryst  C49:2030-2032. 


CRYSTAL  STRUCTURE 


187 


Watson,  W.H.,  Kashyap,  R.P.,  Gao,  F.,  &  Mabry,  T J.  (1991)  Structure  of 
the  flavone  Hymenoxin.  Acta  Cryst  C47:459-461 . 

Wu,  K.,  Wang,  C.,  D’Amico,  M.,  Lee,  R  J.,  Albanese,  C.,  Pestell,  R.G., 

&  Mani  S.  (2002)  Flavopiridol  and  Trastuzumab  synergistically  inhibit 
proliferation  of  breast  cancer  cells:  association  with  selective  cooperative 
inhibition  of  cyclin  D 1  -dependent  kinase  and  Akt  signalling  pathways .  Mol 
Cancer  Therap  1:695-706. 

Yang,  D.H.,  Cai,  S.Q.,  Zhao,  Y.Y.,  &  Liang,  H.  (2003)  Determination  of 
the  absolute  configuration  of  Rohitukine.  Chin  Chem  Lett  14:720-723. 
Yang,  D.H.,  Cai,  S.Q.,  Zhao,  Y.Y.  &  Liang,  H.  (2004)  A  new  alkaloid  from 
Dysoxylum  binectariferum.  J  Asian  Nat  Prod  Res  6:233-236. 

Yang,  X.,  Zhao,  X.,  Phelps,  M.A.,  Piao,  L.,  Rozewski,  D.M.,  Liu,  Q.,  Lee, 
L  J.,  Marucci,  G.,  Grever,  M.R.,  Byrd,  J.C.,  Dalton,  J.T.,  &  Lee,  R  J. 
(2009)  A  novel  liposomal  formulation  of  flavopiridol.  Int  J  Pharmaceutics 
365:170-174. 


B  lilE  •  p  .  **  •  si  y.mwBm 

' 

. 


, 


Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  (2011) 

Volume  46,  Part  2,  pp.  189-200 

REPORTS  FROM  THE  NSIS  COUNCIL 
NOVA  SCOTIAN  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE 

REPORT  OF  THE  PRESIDENT,  2010  TO  2011 

The  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  serves  Nova  Scotia  and  the 
greater  Atlantic  region  of  Canada  by: 

•  Providing  a  forum  for  scientists  and  those  interested  in  science 
to  learn  about  and  discuss  scientific  matters,  through  a  monthly 
public  lecture  and  discussion  series, 

•  Publishing  its  journal  (The  Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian 
Institute  of  Science)  which  has  appeared  regularly  since  1863, 

•  Drawing  attention  to  issues  of  societal  concern  that  intersect  the 
natural  and  social  sciences,  such  as  education,  environmental 
and  natural  resource  policies,  and  ethics  via  the  NSIS  website, 

•  Promoting  research  and  education  in  science  by  awards  made  to 
students  at  each  of  the  Regional  Science  Fairs  in  Nova  Scotia, 

•  Supporting  a  number  of  undergraduate  conferences  organized 
by  the  Atlantic  Provinces  Council  on  the  Sciences  (APICS)  by 
providing  prizes  for  winning  presentations, 

•  Conducting  an  annual  Scientific  Writing  Competition  for  uni¬ 
versity  students, 

•  Presenting  current  and  historical  material  of  Canadi¬ 
an  scientific  importance  to  the  public  on  its  website: 
http://www.chebucto .ns .ca/Science/NSIS/index .html ,  and 

•  Maintaining  a  library  in  collaboration  with  Dalhousie  Univer¬ 
sity  and  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science  ‘Virtual  Hall  of 
Fame’  which  honours  men  and  women  who  have  contributed 
significantly  to  the  scientific  activity  in  Nova  Scotia. 

The  2010-2011  year  has  proved  successful  with  21  new  members 
joining  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science,  the  publication  of  two 
issues  of  Volume  45  of  the  Proceedings,  and  the  enthusiastic  response 
of  members  and  the  public  to  our  lecture  series.  The  lecture  program 
was  organized  by  Ron  MacKay  with  the  help  of  John  Rutherford  and 
Angelica  Silva.  Most  of  the  lectures  were  held  at  the  Nova  Scotia  Mu¬ 
seum  of  Natural  History  and  the  Institute  is  indebted  to  the  Museum 
for  its  continued  support.  We  acknowledge  the  monthly  assistance  of 
David  Christianson ,  the  Museum ’s  Manager  of  Collections .  From  thirty 


190  PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE 


to  fifty  members  attended  each  lecture.  There  was  an  annual  round 
table  held  in  January,  and  the  NSIS  also  co-sponsored  the  Seventh  An¬ 
nual  Sable  Island  Update,  which  was  held  at  Saint  Mary’s  University 
and  attended  by  some  200  people.  The  programme  of  NSIS  lectures 
was  as  follows: 

Monday  4th  October  2010 

Dr.  Brendan  Murphy,  Earth  Sciences  Department,  St.  Francis  Xavier 
University,  “Mountains:  Past,  Present  and  Future”,  7.30  pm  Nova 
Scotia  Museum  of  Natural  History. 

Monday  1st  November  2010 

Dr.  Mike  C.  James,  Department  of  Biology,  Dalhousie  University/ 
Aquatic  Species  at  Risk,  Fisheries  and  Oceans  Canada,  “The  Leather¬ 
back  Turtle:  Atlantic  Canada’s  Giant  Jellyfish  Predator”,  7:30  pm 
Nova  Scotia  Museum  of  Natural  History. 

Monday  6th  December  2010 

Timothy  Frasier  and  Brenna  McLeod,  Department  of  Biology,  Saint 
Mary’s  University.  “Using  Genetics  to  Learn  about  the  History  of 
Arctic  Whales”  7:30  pm  Nova  Scotia  Museum  of  Natural  History. 

Monday  10th  January  2011 

Panel  discussion  “How  Reliable  is  Science  Anyway?”  :  The  Prob¬ 
lem  of  Decision-making  in  the  Context  of  Scientific  Uncertainty. 

Panellists:  Dr.  Lisa  Gannett,  Department  of  Philosophy,  St.  Mary’s 
University;  Dr.  Bill  Freedman,  Department  of  Biology,  Dalhousie 
University;  Dr.  Tony  Charles,  Department  of  Environmental  Studies, 
Saint  Mary’s  University.  7:30  pm  Scotiabank  Conference  Theatre, 
Sobey  Building,  St.  Mary’s  University. 

Monday  7th  February  2011 

Drs.  Jerry  Singleton,  Melanie  Keats,  Laurene  Rehman  and  David 
Westwood  of  the  School  of  Health  and  Human  Performance ,  Dalhousie 
University,  in  collaboration  with  Halifax  Public  Libraries,  “Be  a  Good 
Sport:  Fun  for  Everyone  Across  the  Life  Course”,  7:00pm  Keshen 
Goodman  Public  Library. 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE  191 


Monday  7th  March  2011 

Drs.  Jonathan  Fowler  and  Tanya  Peckmann  Department  of  Anthropol¬ 
ogy,  Saint  Mary’s  University.  “Facial  Reconstruction:  an  Acadian 
Child  from  the  18th  Century”,  7:30  pm  Nova  Scotia  Museum  of 
Natural  History. 

Monday  4th  April  2011 

Dr.  Cathy  Conrad,  Department  of  Geography,  Saint  Mary’s  University. 

“Citizen  Science:  How  the  Public  Can  Engage  in  Scientific  Inquiry”, 

7:30  pm  Nova  Scotia  Museum  of  Natural  History. 

Monday  2nd  May  2011 

NSIS  Annual  Dinner  and  AGM  (Dalhousie  Faculty  Club).  After 
dinner  speaker  Dr.  Jeanette  Janssen,  Department  of  Mathematics  and 
Statistics,  Dalhousie  University.  “Using  Mathematics  to  Model  the 
World  Wide  Web”. 

Two  issues  of  the  Proceedings  were  published  in  2010,  the  first 
was  one  devoted  to  Scatarie  Island,  NS,  and  the  second  was  a  regular 
issue.  Feedback  to  these  issues  has  been  very  positive.  The  editor, 
Peter  Wells,  plans  to  produce  two  issues  of  the  Proceedings  during 
2011  calendar  year.  The  Institute  is  indebted  to  the  Editor  and  to  the 
members  of  the  Editorial  Board  for  their  services.  We  also  thank  the 
Nova  Scotia  Department  of  Tourism  and  Heritage  for  a  grant  to  assist 
with  the  cost  of  publishing  the  Proceedings.  Finally,  the  Institute  has 
printed  a  further  100  copies  of  the  first  edition  of  The  Flora  of  Nova 
Scotia  which  is  used  by  students  in  courses  on  plant  identification  at 
Nova  Scotian  Universities. 

Dalhousie  University  which  houses  the  NSIS  library  has  digitized 
the  Proceedings  of  the  NSIS  from  1863-1934  and  we  hope  will  make 
more  recent  volumes  available  by  2012.  Further  details  can  be  found 
at:  http://dalspace.library.dal.ca/dspace/handle/10222/!  1192. 

A  Science  Writing  Competition  was  organized  again  this  year  by 
Robert  Cook .  This  year  we  initiated  a  Video  category,  but  unfortunately 
after  some  initial  enthusiasm,  no  video  entries  were  sent  in.  However, 
there  were  submissions  in  the  Writing  category  and  we  extend  con¬ 
gratulations  to  the  winners  in  the  2011  NSIS  Student  Science  Writing 
Competition  who  were  presented  with  certificates  at  the  April  meeting 
of  the  NSIS: 


1 92  PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE 


Mr.  Scott  G.  Harroun  of  Saint  Mary’s  University  is  the  Winner 
of  the  Writing  Award  for  his  paper  “Application  of  Surface  En¬ 
hanced  Raman  Spectroscopy  for  the  Determination  of  Chemical 
Composition  of  Paint  Samples  from  the  Historic  Charles  Morris 
Building  in  Halifax,  Nova  Scotia”. 

And 

Ms.  Carol  Anne  Black  of  Dalhousie  University,  an  Honourable 
Mention  award  for  her  paper  “Turbidity  Currents:  Nova  Scotia’s 
African  Heritage” 

A  NSIS  committee  has  been  established,  chaired  by  Michelle  Paon, 
which  is  working  on  special  events  for  the  150th  Anniversary.  One  of 
the  regular  monthly  lectures  for  the  forthcoming  year,  2012,  will  be  on 
the  history  of  gold  exploration  in  Nova  Scotia  and  will  be  held  at  the 
Art  Gallery  of  Nova  Scotia  in  association  with  their  special  exhibition 
The  Golden  Touch’:  Art  and  Gold  in  Nova  Scotia. 

We  have  submitted  proposals  to  Canada  Post  for  a  special  stamp  to 
celebrate  this  event.  In  addition,  the  Dalhousie  University  School  for 
Resource  and  Environmental  Studies  (SRES)  with  support  from  the 
NSIS ,  applied  to  organize  the  2012  Killam  Lecture  Series  at  Dalhousie 
University.  This  was  approved  and  will  be  part  of  the  celebrations  for 
our  anniversary.  It  will  involve  a  series  of  leading  science  speakers. 
We  are  also  collaborating  with  the  Bedford  Institute  of  Oceanogra¬ 
phy  which  celebrates  its  50th  anniversary  in  2012.  We  applied  to  the 
Donner  Canadian  Foundation  in  2010  for  funds  to  assist  with  NSIS 
activities  associated  with  our  1 50th  anniversary  but  were  unfortunately 
not  successful. 

In  other  activities,  the  Institute  has  again  provided  financial  support 
to  the  ten  Regional  Science  Fairs  in  Nova  Scotia.  Various  members  of 
the  NSIS  Council  acted  as  judges  at  these  fairs  and  selected  projects 
for  the  NSIS  awards. 

In  conclusion,  members  of  the  Institute  are  undoubtedly  aware  that 
the  NSIS  mission  of  presenting  and  promoting  science,  especially 
research,  can  only  be  achieved  by  continued  activity  on  the  part  of 
members  by  serving  on  Council  and  by  taking  part  in  other  activities 
of  Institute.  As  with  all  similar  volunteer  organizations,  there  is  a 
need  tor  younger  members  to  become  active  as  older  members  retire. 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE  193 

The  Institute  has  a  long  and  proud  history  and  will  celebrate  150  years 
of  promoting  science  to  Nova  Scotians  in  2012.  Few  other  Canadian 
organizations  can  boast  this  track  record. 

Finally,  I  thank  all  members  of  Council  for  their  diligence  and  hard 
work  during  the  past  year. 


Respectfully  submitted, 
David  H.S.  Richardson 
May  2nd  2011 


1 94  PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE 

LIBRARIAN’S  REPORT 
2010/2011 

Prepared  for  AGM  May  2, 2011 

There  are  currently  one  hundred  and  seventy-nine  NSIS  exchange 
partners.  Four  institutions,  Linda  Hall  Library,  Kansas  City;  Polska 
Akademia  Nauk,  Poland;  Societe  Geologique  de  Normandie  et  des 
Amis  du  Museum  du  Havre,  France;  VNIRO  Library,  USSR  cancelled 
their  exchange  program  with  us  over  the  past  year.  The  number  of 
institutional  members  has  decreased  by  two  and  is  now  at  twenty-four. 
Public  Archives  of  Nova  Scotia  &  Blacker  Wood  Library,  Montreal 
cancelled  their  membership  in  201 1 .  Invoices  were  sent  out  in  Febru¬ 
ary  2011  for  institutional  memberships  and  to  date  we  have  received 
payment  for  nineteen  renewals. 

Volume  45,  parts  1  and  2  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian 
Institute  of  Science  were  both  published  in  2010.  Both  issues  were 
sent  to  exchange  partners  and  institutional  members  in  one  mailing  to 
save  on  the  cost  of  postage.  The  NSIS  president,  David  Richardson, 
was  able  to  use  the  St.  Mary’s  University  mail  room  service  which 
offered  reasonable  rates  for  overseas  postage. 

Sales  of  past  volumes  of  the  Proceedings  during  2010/2011  gen¬ 
erated  $930.50  in  revenue.  (See  Appendix  A  (attached)  for  details.) 
There  are  126  copies  of  the  Flora  of  Nova  Scotia  by  A.E.  Roland  on 
hand  @  $35.00  each. 

The  Librarian  submitted  the  required  forms  to  Access  Copyright  for 
the  2010  repertoire  payment  to  publishers.  A  cheque  in  the  amount 
of  $43 1 .54  was  received. 

During  the  summer  of  2010  volumes  13  (1910-1914)  -  v.l 8  (1930- 
1934)  ol  the  Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science 
were  digitized  and  made  available  online  through  a  digital  initiative  in 
the  Dalhousie  University  Libraries.  These  volumes  were  deposited  in 
DalSpace  and  can  be  viewed  at  http://www.library.dal.ca/collections/ 
digitalcollections/nsis.  At  the  March  4,  2011,  meeting  Council  ap¬ 
proved  a  iequest  from  the  Librarian  for  funding  for  the  digitization  of 
v.  19  ( 1934-1938)- v.  25  (1958-1962)  of  th  e  Proceedings  of  the  Nova 
Scotian  Institute  of  Science.  This  will  complete  the  first  100  years  of 
the  journal.  A  launch  of  the  digitized  version  of  the  Proceedings  is 
being  planned  for  January  2012,  as  part  of  the  150th  NSIS  anniversary 
celebration .  At  the  April  4th  meeting  of  Council ,  a  cheque  for  $2 ,205 .00 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE  1 95 


was  received  by  the  Librarian  to  fund  a  four  week  position  to  complete 
this  digitization.  A  further  proposal  is  being  prepared  to  estimate  the 
cost  of  finishing  the  digitization  of  the  Proceedings  for  v.  26-present. 

At  the  Council  meeting  of  April  4th,  201 1 ,  a  motion  was  passed  that 
the  price  for  copies  of  the  Flora  would  be  reduced  by  10%  if  ten  or 
more  copies  were  purchased  for  a  class  and  picked  up  from  the  Li¬ 
brarian’s  office  (Regular  price  for  a  single  copy  is  $35.00;  bulk  buy 
discount  price  is  $31 .50  per  copy). 

Dalhousie  University  has  been  assigned  a  new  postal  code.  This 
means  a  change  to  the  NSIS  mailing  address,  effective  immediately. 
The  new  mailing  address  is: 

Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science 

c/o  Killam  Library  Reference  &  Research  Services  Office 

1459  Oxford  Street 

Dalhousie  University,  Halifax,  NS  Canada 

B3H  4R2 

Publications  continue  to  be  received  regularly  from  our  179  active 
exchange  partners  and  this  material  is  added  on  an  ongoing  basis  to 
the  collection.  I  would  like  to  thank  Carol  Richardson  and  the  Seri¬ 
als  Department  staff  in  the  Killam  Library  who  ensure  that  the  NSIS 
Library  operations  continue  to  function  smoothly. 

Respectfully  submitted, 

Sharon  Longard 
NSIS  Librarian 
April  12,  2011 


1 96  PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE 


LIBRARIAN’S  REPORT 
Appendix  A 


Monies 

# 

Date 

Received 

Sold 

Institution 

COST 

Paid 

June  2010 

Flora  of  NS 

1 

Meade  Victoria  Humble 

$35.00 

$35.00 

June  2010 

Flora  of  NS 

1 

Emma  Morgan-Thorp 

$35.00 

$35.00 

June  2010 

Flora  of  NS 

20 

Phil  Schappert 

Biology  2601  class 

$700.00 

$700.00 

September  2010 

v.29  pg.  1-131 

1 

Matteo  Carbona 

$14.50 

$14.50 

(7.50+7.00  S/H) 

November  2010 

v.  45, 

pt.  1 , 2010 

12 

Nova  Scotia  Environment 

$96.00 

$96.00 

December  2010 

v.36. 

1 

N.  S.  Environment  Library 

$10.00 

$10.00 

pt.  2,  1986 

(7.50+2.50  S/H) 

December  2010 

v.34, 

pt.%,  1984 

1 

Sherman  Jackson 

$10.00 

$10.00 

January  2011 

v.34,  pt.  3/4 

1 

Peter  Wells 

$10.00 

$10.00 

February  1 , 20 1 1 

v.27 

3 

David  Bethoney 

$20.00 

$20.00 

suppl.  3,  1975 

(3  x  $5 .00 +  $5.00  S/H) 

Total 

$930.50 

$930.50 

Sales  of  Proceedings  June  2010  -  February  2011 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE  197 


EDITOR’S  REPORT 

NSIS  ANNUAL  GENERAL  MEETING 
MAY  2ND,  2011 

Status  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  NSIS 

PNSIS  Volume  45  (Parts  1  and  2)  was  successfully  completed  over 
the  past  calendar  year.  Over  the  same  period,  we  have  strengthened 
the  Editorial  Board,  prepared  guidelines  for  manuscript  flow,  and  com¬ 
municated  with  the  new  Editorial  Board  regarding  the  Journal  and 
Board  members  responsibilities.  We  hope  the  Board  will  support  the 
Proceedings  by  actively  soliciting  papers  and  being  involved  in  the 
review  process  more  directly.  As  well,  we  are  supported  at  Dalhousie 
University  by  two  staff  members  (Sarah  Stevenson,  Gail  LeBlanc)  for 
journal  layout  and  production,  crucial  roles  for  the  Journal’s  success. 
We  have  an  excellent  and  enthusiastic  team  to  run  the  Proceedings. 

So  far  in  2011,  two  scientific  papers  and  two  student  papers  have 
been  submitted  to  Volume  46(2),  and  a  full  manuscript  has  been  sub¬ 
mitted  for  a  special  issue  Volume  46(1)  by  Dr.  Eric  Mills.  An  internal 
list  of  prospective  papers  and  editorials  is  guiding  our  activities  on 
the  Proceedings,  especially  as  we  move  towards  the  150th  Anniversary 
year,  2012.  As  we  progress  through  this  year,  the  Proceedings  will  be 
redesigned  with  a  new  cover  and  layout,  and  options  considered  for 
making  the  Proceedings  available  in  both  print  and  electronic  formats. 

Papers  and  editorials  are  requested  from  all  members  of  the  NSIS. 
Supported  by  the  website,  the  Proceedings  are  the  visible,  written  voice 
piece  for  the  Society  as  well  as  for  science  in  all  of  its  dimensions  in 
Nova  Scotia  and  the  Maritime  Provinces.  We  hope  to  keep  attracting 
papers  highlighting  the  advances  of  science  by  practitioners  in  the 
Region,  as  well  as  articles  on  the  history  of  science  and  its  current  role 
in  furthering  the  welfare  of  Maritime  society,  from  health  to  economy 
to  environment.  This  is  your  journal;  please  contribute  to  it  and  help  us 
continually  improve  it’s  content,  distribution  and  use  so  that  it  serves 
the  Society,  the  Region  and  Canada  with  excellence ,  far  into  the  future . 

Submitted: 

Peter  G.  Wells,  Dalhousie  University  (Editor) 


198  PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE 


TREASURER'S  REPORT 

NOVA  SCOTIAN  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE 

MARCH  31, 2011 

ASSETS: 

B  ank  Account  5 ,67 4 .44 

Investments  63,068.14 


TOTAL  ASSETS 

68,742.58 

LIABILITIES  AND  NET  WORTH: 

Accounts  Payable 

Science  Fair  100.00 

100.00 

NET  WORTH 

68,642.58 

TOTAL  LIABILITIES  AND  NET  WORTH 

68,742.58 

INVESTMENTS: 

Renaissance  High  Interest  Savings  Account 

CIBC  Investment 

Certificate  A  @5.05%  (due  Jun  2011) 

CIBC  Investment 

Certificate  A  @5.20%  (due  Oct.  2012) 

National  Bank  of  Canada 

Certificate  A@2.900%  (due  May  2013) 
Montreal  Trust  Company 

Certificate  A@ 3. 250  %  (dueJulyl5  2015) 

11,268.14 

11,500.00 

20,000.00 

10,300.00 

10,000.00 

TOTAL  INVESTMENTS 

63,068.14 

Finances 

The  net  worth  of  the  Institute  is  $68,642.58  For  this  year,  revenue 
included  a  grant  of  $1000.00  from  the  Nova  Scotia  Department  of 
Tourism  and  Culture.  The  Institute  also  received  $431 .54  from  AC¬ 
CESS  copyright  for  publication  royalties.  A  donation  of  $500.00  was 
received  from  the  Situating  Science  Cluster  (SSC);  this  is  being  held 
for  a  future  video  award. 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE  199 


REVENUE  AND  EXPENDITURES 
FOR  2010-2011 


REVENUE 

Membership  Dues 

Individuals  $2,480.00 

Institutions  469.83 


AGM  (2010) 


1,482.00 


Donations/Grant 

1535.00 

Sales/Page  charges 

Proceedings 

409.50 

Other-Flora 

770.00 

Income/Royalties 

Investment  Income 

2,458.01 

Access  Copyright  Royalty 

431.54 

Bank  Interest 

0.91 

EXPENDITURES 

Advertisement/Promotion 

$542.36 

AGM  (2010) 

1,557.17 

Office  supplies 

27.49 

Rent 

56.50 

Postage 

1,738.21 

Donations/Prizes 

1,750.00 

Honoraria 

200.00 

Proceedings  Costs 

3,814.86 

Flora  Costs 

1,897.50 

$10,036.79 


$11,584.09 


Net  income:  (Loss)  ($1,547.30) 


200  PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  NOVA  SCOTIA  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE 


Expenditures  for  donations  and  prizes  totalled  $1750.00.  This  in¬ 
cluded  $100.00  donations  to  each  of  10  regional  Science  Fairs  in  Nova 
Scotia,  and  two  writing  competition  awards,  one  each  of  $500.00  for 
graduate  and  $250.00  for  undergraduate. 

Membership 

The  Institute  has  106  individual  members  including  6  life  members 
and  3  student  members.  This  year  there  were  21  new  members.  Dues 
from  individual  members  amounted  to  $2 ,480 .00  and  from  institutional 
members  $469.83. 

Respectfully  submitted  to  the  AGM 

May  2,  2011 

Elaine  D.  McCulloch 

Treasurer 


BIRDS  OF  BRIER  ISLAND 


PROCEEDINGS 

of  the 

Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science 

HALIFAX,  NOVA  SCOTIA 

Volume  46  2011  Part  1 


SPECIAL  ISSUE 

BIRDS  OF  BRIER  ISLAND 


By  Eric  L,  Mills  and  Lance  Laviolette 


«S>  Ucvfs  Scottan  institute  of  Sakta&s 
with  Ar/;o«s  Copynyhi,  The  Canadian  CnpyngM  licensing 

Ag«ncy  htip.'/www  «cc«tescopyr-ght  c« 

Date  C”  Wioation,  September'  2011 


C 

j_ 

(D 
•«— » 

CO 

x> 

L_ 

03 

JZ 

o 

ir 

>. 

-Q 

L_ 

0) 

o3 

03 

0 

JZ 

c n 

CD 

CD 

O 

o 

■4—* 

o 


0 

> 

o 

O 


Birds  of  Brier  Island  by  Eric  L.  Mills  &  Lance  Laviolette.  Sept. 
201 1 ;  gives  a  fascinating  overview  of  the  visiting  and  nesting 
birds  that  have  travelled  through  Nova  Scotia’s  Bay  of  Fundy 
region  and  made  a  stopover  on  Brier  Island.  107pp,  ill.  8.5  x  1 1 
in;  softcover.  Published  as  a  special  issue  —  Vol.  46,  Part  1,  of 
the  Proceedings  of  the  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science. 


Price:  CDN$25.00  +  postage  and  handling. 

201 1  postage  &  handling  charges  per  copy  (CDN  dollars) :  Within  Canada:  add 
$5.00  US  orders:  add  $8.00. 

If  you  wish  to  purchase  multiple  copies,  please  contact  Carol  Richardson 
(clrichar@dal.ca)  about  the  cost  of  postage  and  handling. 

To  avoid  postage  fees,  copies  of  the  book  can  also  be  purchased  in  person 
at  the  Killam  Library  Research  Services  office,  3rd  floor,  Killam  Library,  6225 
University  Ave.,  Halifax,  Nova  Scotia. 


See  next  page  for  Order  Form. 


Order  Form 

Please  send  me _ copies  of  Birds  of  Brier  Island. 

$25.00  per  copy  =  _ 

Add  postage  and  handling  =  _ 

Total  =  $ _ 

Name: _ 

Add  ress : _ 


Province/State: _ 

Country: _  Postal  or  zip  code: _ 

□  Please  send  to  my  Dalhousie  campus  office  (saves  postage) 

Email  address:  _ 

Please  make  cheque  payable  to:  Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science 

Mail  order  form  and  payment  to: 

Nova  Scotian  Institute  of  Science 

c/o  Killam  Library,  Dalhousie  University,  6225  University  Avenue 
P.  O.  Box  15000,  Halifax,  Nova  Scotia,  Canada  B3H  4R2 

PLEASE  PHOTOCOPY  &  FILL  OUT  AND  FORWARD 
TO  ADDRESS  ABOVE. 


RECOMMAND ATIONS  AUX  AUTEURS 


Les  auteurs  peuvent  soumettre  leur  manuscrit  en  anglais  ou  en  frangais  et  doivent 
l’envoyer  auredacteuren  chef  par  courriel(nsis@dal.caetoceans2@ns.sympatico. 
ca) .  Le  titre  du  manuscrit  doit  etre  sui vi  des  noms  de  tous  les  auteurs ,  leurs  adresses 
respectives  et  leurs  adresses  de  courriel.  Un  resume  doit  suivre  qui  comptera  au  plus 
200  mots .  S  i  approprie ,  il  doit  y  avoir  des  sections  tel  que  1  ’  introduction ,  les  methodes , 
les  resultats,  la  discussion,  les  conclusions  et  les  references  bibliographiques. 
L'orthographe  doit  suivre  Le  Grand  Robert,  et  il  est  recommande  de  se  servir  du 
Systeme  international  d’unites.  Des  frais  de  25,00$  par  page  sont  presentement 
imposes,  a  moins  que  tous  les  auteurs  sont  membres  du  Nova  Scotian  Institute 
of  Science.  (Les  frais  d’ adhesion  pour  membres  reguliers  sont  25,00$  par  an,  et 
pour  etudiants  sont  10,00$  par  an.)  Des  tableaux,  des  illustrations  et  des  photos  en 
noir  et  blanc  peuvent  etre  inclus  et  seront  reproduits  sans  frais  supplementaires. 
Au  format  copie  papier  du  journal,  les  couts  de  reproduction  en  couleurs  seront 
aux  frais  des  auteurs,  et  seront  environ  500$  par  planche  qui  peut  etre  une  seule 
photo  ou  un  collage.  Chaque  tableau  ou  illustration  doit  porter  un  titre  et  une 
legende  auto-explicative. 

Veuillez  consulter  des  exemplaires  du  Journal  pour  verifier  le  format  du  manuscrit. 
Chaque  page  doit  etre  numerotee.  Les  references  bibliographiques  doivent  etre  en 
ordre  alphabetique  et  doivent  montrer  le  nom  complet  de  la  revue,  et  si  approprie, 
les  numeros  des  revues,  comme  les  exemples  suivants: 

Nielsen,  K.J.,&  France,  D.F.  (1995)  The  influence  of  adult  conspecifics  and  shore 
level  on  recruitment  of  the  ribbed  mussel  Geukensia  demissa  (Dillwyn).  Journal 
of  Experimental  Marine  Biology  and  Ecology  188  (l):89-98. 

Cushing,  D.  &  Walsh,  J.  (1976)  The  Ecology  of  the  Seas.  W.  B.  Saunders 
Company,  Toronto. 

Lee,  G.F.  (1975)  Role  of  hydrous  metal  oxides  in  the  transport  of  heavy  metals  in 
the  environment .  In:  Krenkel ,  P.  A .  (ed.) ,  Heavy  Metals  in  the  Aquatic  Environment . 
Pergamon  Press,  Oxford,  pp.  137-147. 

Communication  personnelle:  Smith  A.J.  (2001 ,  pers.  comm.)  in  text. 

Document  sur  un  site  web:  Auteur  (l’annee  de  publication)  titre,  URL  et  la  date 
de  consultation. 

Les  auteurs  sont  responsables  pour  la  revue  des  epreuves  en  placard  dans  les 
plus  brels  delais.  Une  reproduction  electronique  de  Particle  en  format  PDF  sera 
lournie  gratuitement  aux  auteurs.  Comme  un  des  avantages  d’adhesion,  les 
membres  du  NSIS  regoivent  chaque  numero  du  journal  au  format  copie  papier. 

Des  exemplaires  des  numeros  speciaux  de  la  revue  sont  en  vente  chez  NSIS  aux 
frais  etablis  par  NSIS. 


NOVA  SCOTIAN  INSTITUTE  OF  SCIENCE  COUNCIL  2011  -  2012 


President:  John  Rutherford 

Vice-President:  Michelle  Paon 

Past  President:  David  Richardson 

Secretary:  Linda  Marks 


Treasurer:  Elaine  McCulloch 

Editor:  Peter  G.  Wells 

Librarian:  Sharon  Longard 

Webmaster:  Suzuette  Soomai 

Publicity:  Regis  Dudley 


Councillors:  Robert  H.  Cook  (Writing  Competition  Coordinator),  Michelle  Paon  (2012 
Sesquicentennial  Committee),  Henry  (Hank)  Bird,  Angelica  Silva,  Robert  Boudreau, 
John  Young,  Rick  Singer 

Student  Representative:  None 

Observers:  David  Christianson  (Nova  Scotia  Museum),  Mike  Sinclair  and 
Claudia  Currie  (BIO  2012  Anniversary  Celebrations  Committee) 


INSTRUCTIONS  TO  AUTHORS 


Papers  may  be  submitted  in  either  English  or  French  and  should  be  sent  electronically  to 
the  Editor  at  (nsis@dal.ca  and  oceans2@ns.sympatico.ca).  The  title  should  be  followed  by 
names,  addresses  and  e-mails  of  all  authors.  An  abstract  of  up  to  200  words  should  follow. 
As  appropriate,  sections  devoted  to  introduction,  methods,  results,  discussion,  conclusions 
and  references  should  be  included.  Canadian  spelling  and  SI  units  should  be  used  wherever 
possible.  There  is  currently  a  page  charge  of  $25  per  page  but  this  will  not  be  levied  if  all 
authors  are  NSIS  members  (Membership  costs  $25  per  year  for  regular  members  and  $10 
year  for  students.)  Tables,  figures  and  black  and  white  photographs  may  be  included  and  will 
be  published  without  an  extra  charge.  Publication  of  colour  figures  in  any  hard  copy  of  the 
journal  will  incur  a  charge  that  must  be  borne  by  the  author  and  will  likely  be  in  the  range  of 
$500  per  plate  which  may  be  a  single  photo  or  a  collage.  All  tables  and  illustrations  should 
have  a  title  and  a  self-explanatory  legend. 

Refer  to  back  issues  of  the  Journal  for  general  layout  of  a  paper.  Pages  should  be  numbered. 
References  should  be  in  alphabetical  order  and  give  the  full  title  of  the  journal  and  issue 
numbers  where  appropriate,  thus: 

Nielsen,  K.J.,  &  France,  D.F.  (1995)  The  influence  of  adult  conspecifics  and  shore  level  on 
recruitment  of  the  ribbed  mussel  Geukensici  demissa  (Dillwyn).  Journal  of  Experimental 
Marine  Biology  and  Ecology  188  (l):89-98. 

Cushing,  D.  &  Walsh  J.  (1976)  The  Ecology  of  the  Seas.  W.  B.  Saunders  Company,  Toronto. 

Lee,  G.F.  (1975)  Role  of  hydrous  metal  oxides  in  the  transport  of  heavy  metals  in  the 
environment.  In:  Krenkel,  PA.  (ed.).  Heavy  Metals  in  the  Aquatic  Environment.  Pergamon 
Press,  Oxford,  pp.  137-147. 

Personal  Communication:  Smith  A.J.  (2001,  pers.  comm.)  in  text. 

Website  Citation:  Author  (year)  title,  URL  and  date  accessed. 

Authors  are  responsible  for  correcting  and  returning  proofs  promptly.  Authors  will  be  provided 
with  a  PDF  of  their  paper,  free  of  charge.  NSIS  members  receive  a  hard  copy  of  the  Proceedings 
as  part  of  their  annual  membership.  Copies  of  Special  Issues  of  the  NSIS  proceedings  may  also 
be  purchased  from  NSIS  at  a  charge  established  by  the  NSIS.  See  the  NSIS  website  http:// 
www.chebucto.ns.ca/Science/NSIS/  for  details.