a
.r_
Ac*'
COLLECTION OF PURITAN AND
ENGLISJ&THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE
I
LIBRARY OF THE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY
SCC„
y, ,2—-
THE
[REASONABLENESS
AND
CERTAINTY
OF THE
C|)?tfttatt3&eltgtotn
BOOK II.
Containing, Difcdurfes upon fuch Sub-
jects as are thought molt liable to Ob-
• jeftions. ,ip/y _^
By Rolen J^/^Chaplain to the Right Honour
able the Earl of Exeter, and late Fellow of
St. Johns College' in Cambridge.
LONDON:
Printed for Veter Buck^ at the Sign of the Temple^ near
the Inner-Temple-Gate in Fleet -ftreety 1700.
PREFACE.
"^HERE never appeared, I believe^
among Chi iftians fo general. a Difaf-
feclion as in the prefent Age, to the
Chriftian Religion, in Men pretend^
ing at leaft to Reaibn and Learning, and Na-
tural Religion, and Moral Vertue. And tho'
I could have little Encouragement to hope,
that I fhould write any thing which might
much prevail with iMen of thefe Accomplifh-
ments; yet I was perfuaded that-fo good a
Caufe, tho' but in weak Hands, could not
fail of fome Effe£t upon all that would be
at the pains to confiderit. And to this Pur«
pofe, I thought, the b. ft way would be, not
to read Lectures, as it were, of Anatomy
upon the ieveral Parrs of it, and reprefent it
Piece-meal, like a lifdefs Carcafs, divided
Sfid dirTec~ted ; tbo' I had been able to . fhew
fiever lb much Skill in the Operation 5 but to
give an entire View of the Grounds and
Realbns of Chriftianity, the connexion of its
Parts between themfelves and the Preference,
illicit it has to all .other Religions- from
9 whence
ii The Preface.
whence, I knew, it muft appear in as true a
Light, and with as much Life and Force, as
it could do under the Disadvantages, which
might be expected from no better a Pen.
There is an Excellency in every Part of our Re-
ligion feparately confider'd,but the ftrengthand
vigour of each Part is in the Relation it has to
the reft, and the ieveral Parts muft be taken al-
together, if we would have a true Knowledge,
and make a juft Eftimate of the Whole.
But that which I made my more particular
Care, and which, I thought, the more re-
quired my Pains, becaufe I had not obferved
it to be much infifted upon by others, was to
fhew the Neceflity of a Divide Revelation,
the infufficiency of Natural Religion, and
the Imperfections and Errors of Philpfophy,
as well as the manifeft FaKhood of the Re-
ligions both of the Heathens and of the Ma-
hometans; and moreover to prove, that
fides all other Things requifitc to a Divine
Revelation, the Religion delivered in the
Old and New Teftament has received a full
Promulgation in all Parts of the World.
From thele Foundations thus laid and fecur'd,
we have no lefs than a Demonftraiion for
the Truth of our Holy Religion.
We are often told by thofe that are no
Friends to our Religion, that we muft by all
means take great Care of not being deceived
through the Prejudices derived from our Edu-
cation ; but I believe it would be found upon
Enquiry
The Preface. iii
Enquiry, that fuch Men are fb far from be-
ing prejudiced in Favour of our Religion,
that their Prejudices lie extreamly againft it.
For, befides the Corruption of Humane Na-
ture always inclining to Error and Vice,
tho' they had the Principles of Chriftianity
inftill'd into them in their tender Years,
yet they could learn them then only as con-
fer! Truths, to be receiv'd for Articles of
Faith and Rules of Life. But the firft thing
probably to which they have fet themfelves
with any Application, was the reading of
Heathen Authors, and when perhaps they
have ftudied Philofbphy and other Humane
Learning for many Years, but never confi-
dered Divinity, as a Science, and have fearch>
ed into it no farther, nor have any other
Notion of it, than what they were taught
in their Childhood or Youth, they look back ,
upon their firft Inftru&ions as groundless
and fit only for Children, becaule they find lit-
. tie or nothing of them in thofe Authors, with
whom they have been fo long converfant,'
and whom upon many- Accounts they have
, fo juit Reafon to admire. This feems to be
the Cafe of many who have read antienc
Heathen Authors, without the Regard, which
ought always to be had to That, which is
acknowledge! by All, who have made any
due Enquiry into thefe Things, to be the
beft Learning and of greateft Antiquity, ' and
. *s no where to be had bat from the Scriptures '
b 2 Others
iv . The Preface.
Others there are, who have often heard of
the Names of Socrates, P/ato, and Jrijlotle^
and of Tu$y, Seneca, and other Famous
Writers *, they find them frequently quoted,
and commonly with Commendation, feldom to
difcover any\Fault in them, unlefsit be in their
'Notions of Natural Fhilofophy,where Religion
ieems to be lels concerned. They have heard
too of the Greek" and Latin Hittorians, and
thefe.for any thing that they Know or conlleier,
may be as Faithful and as Ancient as the belt.
>But tho' all thefc Authors have indeed verv
many Excellencies, yet we muft not fo far mi-
stake, as to think all things Excellent which
they deliver. I (kill therefore, befides what
I have already obferved, make fbme farther
Reflections in this place both upon the Hiffo-
ry, and upon the Philofbphy of Heathen Na-
tions.and then I hope I may be allowed to
expoiluiate wit'i the.Adverfaries of our Reli-
gion, concerning the Unreafonablenels of their
Proceedings, before I come to give a fliort Ac-
count of my prefent Undertaking.
I. Wh.atever knowledge almoft we have
now left of the Antiquities of other Heathen
N uions, it comes conveyed down to us by the
Greek Author*; and vet there is perhaps no
Nation, which generally had a worfe Repu-
tation in mat • tqryj not only by com-
mon Fame a Invectives of Satyrifts,
buc from the Cenfures of the belt Writers,
and the Acculations which the Hiitorians made
one
The "Preface. v
'one of another, as f Jofepbm fhews of many + fW°"
whofe Works are now loir. Qa) Thucydiaes nim-^on./#
felf could net efcape free from Cenfure, who i.
complains of the negligence and unfaithfulnefs^J*"*
of the other Greek Hiftorians, and he is thought*. 20. 1';
to point particularly at Piero/lotus, whom Pta-
tarcb Fxpoied in a fet Difcouife : tho' much in-
deed has been (aid in Vindication of Herodotus,
by H. Stephens and jo^. Camer arias', and the
Difcovei ies of Modern Travellers confirm ma-
ny things in this Hiftory, which were former-
ly thought incredible. (bj Strabo has obferv'd, (h)strab.
that the Greeks knew little of the mod Fa- ^w- ub-
'mous- Nations of JJia, except the Per fans,
and that Homer knew nothing of the Empire
of the Jffyrians or Meats, buc that he has 0-
mitted the mention of the Magnificence of^f^-
Bdylon, Nineveh \ and Ecbatane, tho' he took f«r.
notice of the MgyptUn Thebes, and of the(d)2v&»/-
Wealth both of that Place and of Ph<eni-ne™ru%n-
ci& <*) Saljuft fufpected that the Athenians too quotum
highly Magnifyed their own Actions, And «*##'."-
there is in \f) Vopijcm a fevere Charge againft^/^^-
the Hiftorians in general, that there is none oiu^uii efe
them, who has not fallifyed in fome thing OF^*??"**
other, particularly that as toLivy, Salluft.'Tar Jlr/iiJo.
citas and Trogus Pompeius, it might be clearly
proved upon them. And C) Pliny has fijr-j CO in fac-
. ' dercr.quod.
expullis
Regibus, Populo Romano dedit Porfrna, nominatim comprehenfum in-
vemmus, r.e ferro, nifi in Agriculture, utcrentur. Plin. Nat. Hift. lib.
xxxiv. c. 14.
b 5 nifhed A
vi The Preface.
nifhed us with an inftance of great Partiality in
the Roman Hiftories, which conceal that Porfe-
na in his League with the People of Rome, obli-
ged them to make no ufe of Iron, but for the
Tilling of the Grounds : This Pliny confef-
(es was an exprefs Article of that League :
And how unlike is the Roman to the Jewifb
Hiftory in this very Inftance? For in the
Scriptures we find it twice mentioned, that
the Tfraelites were reduced to that Condition,
that they were permitted to have no Wea-
pons of War. Judg. v. 8. i Sam. xiii. 19.
'uI'ttorl^m ^e Roman (f/ Hiftorians had mere re-
rit *r/>tf-gard to the Honour of the Roman Name
ieodmritbah to Truth. And it is no Commendation
fiS GPe!'°f tne ^ame Hiftorians, that they take fo lit- *
tiumvvpu- tie notice of the Jews, and fay fb little to their
li':at }^!\ Advantage, when they do fpeak of them,
'venue /'4-fince Jofephus has proved the Leagues be-
(Jr^.fween the Jews and the Remits, and the Pri-
£ju*»Jvileges granted them by the Romans, be-
yond all Denial, from the Tables then extant
wherein they were contained.
'• ul'\ $ Livy declares that molt of the Monu-
ments of Antiquity, whether Publick or Pri-
vate, were deftroyed, when the City was
Burnt by the Gauls, and that for this Rea-
fbn, his Hiftory to the rebuilding of the Ci-
ty, near four hundred years after it was firfl
Built, is bu: uncertain.
The moft Antient Writings, which had
any Relation to Hiftory among the Romans,
were
The Preface. vii
were their* Funeivl Oatior.s: Thefe werepre-
ferved in their feveral Families* which as
<0 T»ffy confeffeth, caufed their Hiftory to/,|£^'
b faulty, rr-any things being inferted in
this lbrt of Works, which were never done,
falie Triumphs, falie Confulfhips, and falie ^.^^
Genealogies. Th&JmUks (hy Maxim wrere or at. lib,
of good ufe, but they contained only the 2.
f?rlt Lines and rough Draughts of Hiftory,
which appeared quite another thing, when
it was filled up, and Reprefented entire with
the Reaions and Circumftances of Affairs, ac-
cording to the Pleafure or Skill of the Wri- (\) /j.
ter. But the Praifes (l ) of their Aneeftors lrut-
were fung in Ver(e at their Banquets, where Oo id.r™
ftria Truth could rarely be heard. The Ge- *£u*«
nerals of Armies fbmetimes had (V their Hi-
ftorians or Poets along with them, whom mg^.
they liberally rewarded 5 we may be fure am qui&em
not for telling when they were beaten. At- c0"cefum
ticus ( ) in Taffy fays, it was a thing of courfe ribmtmer,.
to relate Matters of Hiftory, not according to tin in m-
Truth, but in fuch a manner, as might beft $2£*tf
ihew the Wit and Eloquence of the Wri- dicere pof-
ters. Tuffy lays * it down as a known and fim^i-
fundamental Rule of Hiftory, that an Hifto- w
rian fhould dare to fay any Truth, but no- *vcorxu
thing that is falfe. Yet in an Epiftle to Lt*~ nb-*- '
ceiusy whom he entreats ro Write the Hiftory FmfiuL
of his own Miniftration of Affairs, he ear- t . Epift-
neftly befeeches f Luceius, in plain Terms to Ji- j^
neglect the Laws of Hiftory in his Favour, \. fp)ji. £.
b 4 and
viii The Preface.
and to difregard Truth. And as if this had
been a thing not unufual, or, atleaft, warrant-
able enough ; he commends this Epiftle in
another to Atttcus, and defires him to pro-
mote the Defi^n. It has been remarked by
fome as a Fate upon Cicero, that this Teftimo-
ny of his Vanity fhould remain, when the
Hiftory, of which he was fo defirous, is
loft, if it was ever Written : But who knows
how many fuch Epiftles are loft, when the
Hiftories are preferved ? This is in com-
mon with the Greek1 and Latin Hiftorians,
that they put fuch Speeches as they think fit,
into the Mouths of the feveral Perfons con-
cerned in the Actions they relate, which
gives another View and Appearance to the
Scene of Affairs, and acquaints us, not what
fuch Perfons faid or thought, but what the
Hiftprian would have (poke, and what Ad-
vice he would have given, if he had been
in their Place. Herodotus has much of the
Simplicity of Antient times, his Speeches are
Natural, containing for the moft part but a
bare Narrative of what was faid or done,
only the Penons tell their own Story. But
■ of all the Speeches which are to be met with-
al in any Hiftory, there are none ib Natural,
or which have fuch plain Characters of
Truth in them, as thofe in the Scriptures,
The Antiquities of China were deftroyed a-
bout two hundred years before Chrift, and
from the feveral Relations given of that Mat.
ter
The Preface, ix
ter by different Authors, it appears, that the
Chinefes are rather willing to have it believ'd,
that their old Books were in fomeftrange man-
ner or other preferv'd, than that they are able
to make it out.
It was the Cuftom of, the MgyptUm to
omit the mention of thele Perfons, of whom
they had any ditlike, or who had made them-
felves odious to them. Thus in the xxth Dy-
nafty of their Kings there is a total Vacancy for
the fpaceof clxxviii Years, which the Learned
Mr. Greaves, with great Probability Supplies
.with the Names of thofe Kings, who built
the Pyramides, two whereof, Cheops and Che-
phren, as (m )Herodotm fays, the ALgyptians out of r^\^em
Hatred to trjeiri, would not fb much as name, c. 128.'
but called. the Pyramid, s, which they had ere-
cted, -the.'P) r amides- of Philition, a Shepherd,
who in thofe days/fed his Cattle there : The
which Ha?red,fhy$ (n) Mr. Greaves, occasioned by (n)Diodor.
their Oppre/Jious, as Diodorus alfo mentionsJlc-u[ 1.
might caufe- Manethos to omit the reft, eftecialiy i^mido-
Sabachus.iws -/Ethiopian-, and an Vfurper. But^k
whatever account is to be given of the sEgy-
ptian Hiftory in that particular, this makes the
Hiftory of that Nation in general very uncer-
tain, and may afford a fufficient Reaibn, why
the Jews are either omitted, or mifreprefented
by Heathen Hiftorians, who had what they
relate of them from the ALgyptians ; and the
Hebrews neither hVd with the /Egyptians,' nor
left them, uponfiich Terms9 as to have their
Story
x The Preface.
Story faithfully told by a Nation, who would
fiirTer nothing to pafs down to Pofterity, if
they could help it, thatwasdifpleafingtotfiem,
when it happened j but if any thing were fo
Notorious, as not to be capable of being
wholly ftirled, they would before to vary and
deface it with falfe Circurnftanccs in the Re-
ports, which they rave out concerning it.
And here I muft once more complain of
Mr. Blount j who, as if he had been an /Egy
. pian Hiftoi ian, that had an implacable Hatred
of our Religion, profeffing to tranflate that
place of Tacitus, which concerns the Original
of the Jews, cuts his Tranflation fhort, and
goes no farther than the Vilifying and falfe
part of the Account, which Tacitus gives:
for his Character of their Religion, and the
Relation of what Rompey difcovered upon his
Entrance into the Temple, is omitted. And
befides, that which he has tranflated, is far
front being exa£t : but as I obferved before,
that in (peaking di the Ark, he had made Sir
Thomas Brown fay, that will not appear feafible,
which the Learned Knight had faid, will appear
jfenfible : fb he has dealt no better with Taci-
tus, making him likevvife deny what he had
fftfaM. affirmed : Tacitus (°) fays, Hi ritus quoquo
v. modo indncti Antiquitate defenduntur* Thefe
Rites, by what means foever introduced, arc
(v) owl. defended h thw Antiquity: which Cp)Mr.
of xgafon. Blount tranflates thus ; But by what means foe-
p. 132. ver tj}gy j}avff ym introduced, they have no An-
tiquity
The Preface. xi
tiquity for their P \ttronization. This is to life
the Hiftory of Tacitus as ill as he doth that of
the Bible, and much worfe than Tact: us him-
felf has done the J#vs. For if it be rightly
underftood, what Tacitus has written of the
Jews proves a very remarkable Vindication of
their Religion. He fays indeed that they
confecrated the Image of an Afs, but he fays
it only as a Report, which he confutes after-
wards hirrifelf by acknowledging, that Pom-
■ .fey, when he entred into the Temple, found
no Image in it ; and giving an Account of
their Religion, he fays : &gyptij felraque Ani-
malia, cffigiefque compofitts vexerantur. Judai
mente fela, ununtque nimten intelligunt. Prom
fanos, qui Deum imagines mort dibits materiify
in Jpecies Hominum cjfingunt* Summum illud,
sternum^ neque mutabile> neque inter it uritm.
Igitur nulla fimulacbra Vrbibus fuis7 nedum
Templis funt. Which is fo contrary to what
this Hiftorian writes before in thefe words j
Ejfigiem animalis^ quo monftrante, errorem fi-
timque defulerunt> fenctrali /acravere, that
fome have charged him with contradicting
himfelf ; but it is evident, that the Story of
their Wbrfhiping an Als, is related as a Tra-
dition, which is afterwards fufficiently con-
futed by his own Account of their Doctrine
and Worlhip, and by what Pompey found,
Nulla, nittu Deum Fffigie, nacnam fedem^
& inania Arcanji* Whatever his' Defign
was, and however his obfcure way of writ-
ing
xii The Preface.
ing has made him to be mifunderftood, there
can hardly be any thing laid more for the
Truth and Honour of the Jovijh Religion,
than what Tacitus has delivered of it.
And if any one will compare, that which
(<L> rr° Tully hath laid, in the fame (ll) Oration of
f sea. , £ Greeks and of the Jews, he mufl: conclude,
That what is fpoken againft the Jews, is rather
to their. Commendation, than to their Dif-
grace. Tully there declares the Greeks to be
of no Credit nor Efteem, but unfaithful, .
and of the worft Reputation, even to a Pro-
verb in their Tefti monies and Oaths. He is
careful not to involve the Athenians and L&-
cedaxionians in the common Scandal, who ap-
peared for his Client, and gives a high Cha-
racter of the Maffllians, and would feem to
confine his Dilcourfe to the Jfiatick Greeks,
by whole own Confeflion, he fays, the Peo-
ple of Pkrygia, Myfia, Car/a, and -Lydia were
proverbially Infamous. When he has ex-
prefr. this Contempt of the Greeks, he falls
next upon the" Jews : But what has he to fay
of them? He calls their Religion a barba-
reus Superftition, and Jemfalew, a Sufpiaous
and Railing City, and he pronounces the
Jeivzflj Religion to be unfuitable to rheSpleh-'
dor and Gravity, and the Cuftoms of the
Remans ; lie infinuates that they were a People
not well arK&ed to the Rowan State, and ur-
ges the Conquer! of them by Pompey, as an
Argument againft the Truth* of their Reli-
gion.
The Vreface. xiii
gion. When fo very Learned an Orator had
not !iing buc thefe common Topicks of Slander
to charge them withal, tho' it was for the
Intereft of his Caufe to fpeak the wcrft he
knew of them ; what could be a greater Ju-
flification of the Jews and their Religion?
One of the Accufations laid againft Flaccus,
whole Defence Tully had undertaken, was,
that Summs of Gold having been wont to be
lent out of Italy, and out of all the Roman
Provinces to the Temple at Jerufalem, Flaccus
had forbidden any to be exported from Jfta.
Here it concern 'd Tully to expofe the Worfhip
of the Jews, and to vindicate the Prohibition
relating to it ; but he, who never fpoke little
upon any Subject, that could afford a Scope
for his Eloquence, fays fb little here to the
difpyaifeof thenar and their Religion, that
the Commendation of another had been Jefs
to their' Honour; It is oblervable that Tully
mentions nothing of their Worshiping ah
Afs, which was fo groundless and fpplifb a
Slander, that it Js hard to imagine what could
give occafionto it, ?nd perhaps no better Ac-
count of it can be affigned, than that the Ene-
mies of their Religion wore rcfblved ro fallen
the worft and moll ridiculous Falfhfopd they
could upon ir. But if it may be permitted
me to add a Conjecture to thole which have.
been made by others ; it teems probable, that .
the higheft degree of Excommunication among
the Javi being ftyled $hammaihay which is
the
xiv The Preface.
the lame with Maran Aiba, Sham fignifying
, .d Lord, as f Marm alfo doth in the Syr itc
Grot. & and other Languages 5 and Atba fignifying
Hm. ad cometh ; Atba might either Ignorantly or Ma-
1 cor.xvi. iic}ou{]y be miftaken for Atbon, which figni-
fies an Afi. And it is likely, that this Ca-
lumny might be firft raifed by fome Body,
who had been Excommunicated, and turned
Apoftate.
It would be a very wrong inference from
what has been faid, to conclude, that there is
no certainty in the Greek and Latin, and other
Heathen Hiftorians: For the Circumftances
of the Relation, and the Confent of divers
Authors, may put moft parts of Hiftory paft
doubt. But it ought to be confidered, that
thofe which have been mentioned, are ex-
ceptions, to which the Sacred Hiftorians are
by no means liable ; they do not charge one
another with Falfhood, nothing can be dis-
covered of Partiality in their Writings, but
they tell the moll: dif^raceful Truths of their
Anceftors, and of themfelves; and the Hiftory
it felf has fo many publick Circumftances, that
they clear it beyond all fufpicion of Deceit.
If the Names of fome Men be omitted, upon
particular occafions, in the Scriptures ; we
find them mentioned there upon others.
And there is evident Reafon, that the Names
of infamous Men fhould in fome Cafes be
omitted, and fhould not be mferted in Ge-
nealogies, and enrolled in theRegifters of Ho-
nour,
The Preface. xv
nour. But when the Memory of Perfons and
Actions is totally fuppreft, this muft extream-
ly aba'-e the Credit of any Hiftory. The Jews
are the only People in the World, that have
had their Antiquities by an uninterrupted Tra-^
dition delivered down and preferved in an .
Authentic]* Book, unanimoufly afTerted by
the whole Nation, in all Ages, which they
have never changed nor altered, but have
in great numbers facrificed their Lives in Te-
stimony of it. If the Heathens in divers
things contradict, the Hiftory of the Jews,
they contradict one another as much in the
Accounts of their own Antiquities, and what
they relate of the Jews, is upon uncertain
and contrary Reports. If they conceal what
concerns the Jews, it was their Cuftom to ftifle
that which did not pleafe them. The Hi-
ftories as well as the Religion of moft o-
ther Nations were kept (ecret, and not com-
municated to the People, no Book of Hifto-
ry among them was ever put into tke hands
of a whole Nation, with a ftricl: Charge to
every one to read and ftudy it, as the Books
of Mofes were, when the Principal and moft i
Memorable things related, were within the
knowledge and Memory of all that read them.
The Jews were under a neceffity of prelerving
their Genealogies, with all imaginable Care
and Exactness, if they would make good
the Claim and Title to their Inheritances,
fo that the meaneft among them could with
the*
9ib. vn. c
xvi The Preface.
the "greatefl: certainty derive his Line from
Adam, whereas the Perfi.t/i Kings, as we learn
(r)Her0i.jprom q Herodotus, couid boait I -Lit of a
' Jhort Detpent, and the Kin£s and Kmperours
of the Romum and of other Nations, to ad-
vance their Pedigrees were forced to have re-
course ro fabulous' Reports. And the Hea-
then Aicoun s of the Original, not only of
particular 'Families, but of the feveral Na-
tions of the World, are acknowledged to be
Fabul >us, or, at the beft, but very uncertain,
the mod:, accurate Hiiforians.
.• Account of the Prophecies and Mira-
cles contained in the Scriptures was impofli-
ble to be miftaken at firft, and it has been
rranfrnitted with all the certainty that arty
Hiftory is capable of, to Pofterity. And the
Writers of the Old an.i New Teftament all
agree in the Account of the Creation, of the
Deluge, of; Abraham and the other Patriarchs^
of the Bondage of'the Ifraelites ill /E?ypt,
their Miraculous Deliverance from thence,
and their Journ . ing into the Land ot Cintxn ;
they all frequently affert, fuppoie or imply'
the Truth of theie things; there is a conti-
nued Series and Line of Truth obfervablc
throughout tile whole Scriptures. But a«
mopg Heathen Writers it is oth rvvife ; they
contradict orie another in Matters of any con*
fiderable Antiquity, if tney agree in lome
material PaiTages, it is commonly with much
variation in the Cucumitunces, and with
gte*S
The Prefaced xvii
great Uncertainty and Doubtfulnefs; and the
things in which they moft agree, arefuchas
have been taken from the Scriptures, which
compote a Book, that if it were but for the
Antiquity and Learning of it, is the moft
valuable of any Book in trie World, and no-
thing but Vice and Ignorance, and that which
is the worft fort of Ignorance , a Pretence to
''Learning could make it fo much defpiled.
II. It the Hiftories of Heathen Nations be fo
little to be relied upon, their Philofbphy will
appear to be worthy of no more Regard,
which, for any thing of Truth and Ufeful-
nefs there is* to be found in it, depends fb
much upon Hiftorical Traditions. That Poe-
try is the moft antient way of Writing, is :
•not only aflerted by Heathen Authors, but
may with great probability be made out from
the Scripture it felf. Poets were the Chief
upholders of the Religion and the Philofo-
phy in ufe among the Jjeathens ; both thefe
were at the firft taught in fhort Maxims, „
which, that they might be the better i
ceived, and the more eafily retain d in Memo-
ry, were put into Verfe, without any farther
Ornament than *ji'ift what was neccflary to
give a clear and full Exprefiion to their No- ®Jj$$t
tions and Precepts. (f) Socrates and the Phi- MmmA,
lofophers of his time had a value for the7'*-1*
Verfes of Theqgms, and thole which go under
the Name of Pythagorasy ar.e at leaft as an- (t) ApuA
tient as (/) Qkryfippu* , who alleged their •<* •<?«//.
c Autho.w'7ift^
, xviii The Preface.
Authority. Solon . himfelf wrote Elegies ,
whereof fome Remains- are (till prefer v'd.
This gave the Poets a mighty Reputation,
and we find not only Solon, but. others of
them quoted and. appeal'd to by Demqfibcnes
and Mfcbines in the Courts of Judicature, as
well as by Philofophers in their Difcourles.But
the Poets for the more delightful Entertain-
ment of the People, not only indulged them-
felves in that antient and ufeful *vay oflnftru-
00«w'-£Hon by Fables (for he ("} was hardly e-
ef JL fteem'd a Poet, who had been the Authors of
?h /ew.none ) but they became the Promoters of all
***? ^K' manner of Supcrftitions and Idolatrous Wor-
-rh Ty'L, fhip; the Oracles were delivered in Verfe,
rrc/«> ^tu- every Poet wrote fbmething in Honour of
*S t* t^ie ^a^e ^ods, anc* W Socrates himfelf, dur*
pijt. ing his Imprilbnment, made a Hymn in praife
rb*i. 0f jp0ii0. By which means the Original No-
(vt)p if. t«ons Q£ j^ejjgjon and Vertue were fo obfcur-
ed and corrupted, That it was impofliblc in
any Humane way to provide a fufficient Re-
medy. Plato complain d of the Fictions of
Poeti ; but when he fet himfelf to recover
Men to a true Senfe and Notion" of things by
the help of icme antient Tradi'ions, which he
had met wfchaj, he fell into very abfurd and
(infill Errors, and both he. and Socrates pra-
£ki(ed the Idolatries of their Country. They
aflerted many excellent Truths, which they
had received , as they profeft, from Antiqui-
ty ; but whenever they argu'd any Point, they
common-
The Preface. xix
commonly fell into miftakes, which often-
times were of very ill coniequence. * So weak
a thing is Humane Wifdom without the
guidance of Divine Revelation ! And of this
the Philoiophers were fb fenfihle, that divers
of them would have it thought, tfeat they
had fome fupernatural Aililtance, tho' they
were able to bring no fufficient Proof of it.
The Pretences of others defer ve no Re-
gard ; their Impoftures were too Notorious to
admit of any Denial or Excufe. The Genius
of Socrates may be fuppofed Worthy of more
Confideration : yet it amounts to no more
than this, that Socrates declared, that a cer-
tain Genius had accompanied him from his
Ghildhood, which often forbad him to. do
what he had defign'd ; but never put him
upon doing of any thing ; and by the In-
formation of this Gsnius, he often forewarn-
ed his Friends of the ill Succefs of what they •
were about to unclertake. But after the beA
Search I have been able to make concerning
this Genius of Socrates, I cannot but look up-
on it as an intricate and perplext BuHnefs. Ic
may fuffice in this place to obferve, that
(*) Xenofbon acquaints us, that when he ad- WXenojfe
vifed with Socrates, whether he fhould follow CyrUib*
Cyrus in his Expedition, Socrates fent him to 1IJ.
theOracIe of Apollo^ who, he (aid, was to be
coniulted> in oblcure and uncertain Affairs ;
which affords no very advantageous Chara'.'
&er either of Socrates hirrifelf, or of his Ge~
t &
xx The Preface.
(y)cic.ie nius. P) Tally informs us, tfiat ylntipater the
Hwih -s-oick, had made a Collection of fuch things
as Socrates i Genius had difcovered to i.ini ;
but whatever they were, it appears that fully
had little regard to them. And this we are
lure 6fp that all the Philofophy of Socrates
ended in nothing but Uncertainties: For
when he had juft. before his Death difcnuiVd
of the State after this Life, the moft'tfwt he
could fay to his Friends in Conclusion, was,
(z) tyato O that they had a Noble Prifce before them,
Pt*d. greaI ,#opes, and a glorious Venture, and
therefore ought to pofTefs and ' Charm
their Minds with thofe Thoughts. 1 he fug-
geftions of his Genius fignified little to him,
' if it kft him no better inlt rucled, as tof a
future State., in the laft Moments of his
Life*
It muft be acknowledge that Socrates ma'de
great Improvements in the Moral and ufeful
part of Philofophy : He was of an excellent
Underffcanding ; loving and belov'd of honed
Men, and had Courage and Refolution enough
to bear the Affronts and withftand the Malice
of otheis; he minded none but the practical
Dcdiines of Philofophy, and tho' he never
had travelled in feaich after Learning, as it
was the Cuftom in thofe Ages for Philofb-
phers to do, but fcarce ever ltirr'd out of A-
then< ; yet he knew how to make the beft
ufe of the Notions which were brought to
him by thofe, who had been inforeign Coun-
tries.
The Treface. xxi
tries. It muft be conftfs'd, tint if Plato had
not mide Socrates the Author of things which
he had never f) id, as *not only {*)Xerjopho??^^A.GeU
but Socrates himfelf declar'd ; but had giveri*'* l+.f-
us as plain an Account of Socrates.^ Philofb 3Lae,J°^
phy, as Arrian has of that of fpicletw, we *'<«».
mi^ht have known more of him "t'lan we
now are able to do. But f om what Plato and
Xenopbon have laid of Socrates, we may be
afTur'd, that he did 'not refrain from Idola-
trous Worfhip, nor rejeft the Heathen Ora-
cles, nor deliver his own Do&rines without
much Uncertainty and Diffidence.
Plato carried his Philofophy to far greater
Heights than Socrates Jiad done, and the fub-
limer Parts of it were not to be difcovered to
the Vulgar; which were fo difFcult, that he
declares to (h)'Dionyftu5, that Men of Great
Abilities, and as great Application and Lulu ^E^'
ftry, after the Study of thirty lears, at lift,
with much ado, undtrftood them. Some
things were not to be written at all, or Co
I obfcurely as not to be intelligible, if they
fhould fall into the handsof Men, who were
not fit to be fruited with the Secret of them;
^nd he acknowledgeth that his belt and onlyfure
Argument for the Immortality of theSou',with-
out theKuowledge of which,al1 Philofophy can
be but of little worth, wa"s from c)anriencand (cyipiff.
(acred Tradition, The Motions and Traditi- u
ons,. which Plato had brought from other
Countries, with his delightful way of fetting
c i them
xxn The Preface.
them forth > gain'd him great Reputation-;
• fome Attempts were jnade by himfelf and
thofe of his Sect, to bring his Laws into
practice, and to ere£t a Commonwealth after •
the Model of them ; his Name and Memory
was had in Great Efteem, his Birth-day was
kept, and the Solemnity -of it was renewed
about two hundred Years ago, bv fome of
« d Cm_ his Admirers, as we are. told by (d) Fic'tmu^
me??t. in one of that Society. But there is too much
conviv. Alloy found in his Philofophy for any Endea-
Jww Ju"vours t0 £am it a conftant and general Re-
ception. His Errors in fome Cafes are fo no--
(x)rid. torioully grofs and fcmJalous, that ^Serranut
lit ubfv. *ets ovel" aSainft them if! the Margin, Prima In*
Scmt.cdit./dwa homims delirantis, and Portentof* I->fania.
($) orig. (") Artfiotle had ftudied twenty Years under
fofr.ce/f.P/ato, but he fo often confutes and contra*
U&.2. di£ls his M?fter, that he has been charged
with Ingratitude for it. And if Socrates and
Plato did not* firmly believe the Souls Im»
(0 vtd. mortality, Ariftotlc believ'd the contrary, as
uminGree. O many .have prov'd out of feveral places in
frkrim.O'his Works. ,{x) His ^F/7/fhews that he was
rat 3% both in his Practice and Judgment for the Idola* .
■£ten.' tries of his Country. His Books by an Ac-
cident lay conceal'd, till they were brought to
Cg) Strdo Rome Upon tne taking of Athens (O by SyKa.
ji'iu.% But they were known to few Philofbphers in
jyBa.; (h)Tn/l/$i\me. And a Learned Author has
W^- given an Account, what their Fate has been
.' fince.
The
xxu.
The Preface. xxiii
The Se£t of the Stoicks is obferved by Jo-
fephus in the Account of his own Life, to have
been like that of the Pharilees: which (/) c\)crotM
Grotiui fays, is no wonder, firsce in Cyprus, Mau
which was Zenos Native Country, there were 3*
always many Jews. But if the Sroicfcs were
at firft indebted to the' Jews, they certainly af*
terwards*borrow'd much more from the Chri-
ftians. This Sed was very numerous, and
had Men of great Note in the Primitive Ages
of Chriftianity, who did not lofe the oppor-
tunity ofTer'd them of improving it. But the
Philofophers then began to carry on a Joint-
Intereft, and thofe who denominated them-
felves from any particular Se&, were no long-
er ftricT: in adhereing nicely to its Principles.
For upon tve preaching, of the Gofpd #the
World, the Philofophers thought ir concern'd
them to review all chat had 6een formerly
written, to unite tHeir Forces, and felect. thofe
Notions out of every Seel, which were mod
plauHble, omitting fuch as the y fa w 'would
then give Offrnce :. and it appears that they
were greatly beholden to the Religion which
they oppofed and pretended to delpife ; it is e-
vident,that they had read the Scriptures, and do
fometimes make ute of Terms. which they had
taken from thence, unknown to former Phi- ,
lofbphers. But Pnilofcphy after all their En-
deavours Rill retaining many Errors, and want-
ing that Evidence and Authority, which is the
foundation of all true Religion, could nevet^
c 4 maintain
xxiiii The Preface.
maintain its ground againft that Religion,
which was preach'd by thofe, whom they
contemned as ignorant Men; but which in a
fhort time wrought fiich a Reformation in the
World, as the Philofbphy of all Ag€s had
been never able to effect.
It is not to be denied that there were many
great and eminent Examples amongj:he Hea-
then, but then there were always as great E-
normities allow'd in the moft civilize! Nations.
Philofophy was (x) prohibited by three of the
^"fj Principal States of Greece, by the Thdans,
the Spartans, and the Jrgives* And the Ro-
ntans, who have let fb many Famous Examples
to the World, were li||le oblig'd to Philofo-
phy : for all their Worth and Greatnefs was
raifed upon the Stock only of common No-
tiofk, the Tradition^ that they had receiv'd
with the reft of- Mankind, and the* Laws
brought from Athens, which were enacted by
Solon, who had been in /Egypt at a time, when
the Jews were there in fufficient Numbers.
But it was a long while before Philofophers
M/GeU were mfferec* at Rome, they had been (k) ex-
/^.xv.c'pell'd by the Senate: Tally was the firftthat
»'• brought Philofophy into any Credit there, and
by the Apologies which he often makes for his
giving himfelf to the Study of it, we may
perceive under what Prejudices it then lay a«
mong the Romans, and that there was need
of all his Wit and Eloquence to gain it Ad-
miifiorio
A
The Preface. xxv
A ftrift Difcipline both in Peace and War,
great Application and Induftry, by which
they improved their common Notions, arid
arriv'd to wonderful Experience and Dexterity
in the Management, of Affairs, a zealous Love
of their Country, and an unparallell'd Con-
ftancy, manifeft in all their Actions, and e-
fpecially in the' Obfervation of" their Laws,
raifed the Romans to that mighty Height and
Extent of Empire. ' But that which they re-
tained of Truth in relation to Matters of Re-
ligion had been fo abufed and difguifed with
Fabulous Corruptions, that at length it had ge-
nerally loft all Belief amongft them. . (») Tully (i)proc/w«
made no Scruple at a publick Tryal in a Court emio.
of Judicature, to deny the Punifhments of the
Wicked in a future State, as a ridiculous Fi-
ction, which fhews a ftrange Corruption of
Principles in that Age ; when he could pro-
pofe to himfelf to gain his Caufe by {peaking
in that manner. In another Oration, he fays,
("V Non femper fuperet vera ilia & diretfa (m)pr0
Ratio, vine at aliqnsndo cupiditas, voluptafque M. Calio^
rationem. That this fhouid be fpoken in a
publick Pleading by one of the Graveft and
moft Learned of ail the Romans , fhews how
little either the Philofophy which he hadftu-
died, or the Roman Laws themfelves could do
towards the Eftablifhment of Vertue, and that
the Modefty of Youth, and the Vertue* and
Honour of Families mujt be fecur'd uponfome
better Principles., Afterwards he adds : Ve-
rum
XXvi The Preface.
rum fiqitis eft, qui etia'm n/eretriciis Amorih1^
inter dictum juvevtuti pitet, eft tile quidem v/tl-
de feveru* : N.egdre non poffdw, fed abhorret
non modo ab hu\ns [eculi licentia, ve? u.;t eti ir,i
£ Major urn conj net u dine at fa e conc,c[/is- I be-
lieve there is fcarce any man fo far loft to all
Shame among Ghriftians, that he would be
willing to hear himlelf fo defended in a Pu-
blick Court, or any Judge that would admit
of fuch a Defence: which is a manifeft Ar-
gument of the Excellency of .the. Ciiriftian
Religion, that it lays fuch a powerful Re-
ftraint upon Men. But this loofnefs of Man-
ners was the fatal Jfore- runner of that horrid
and monftrous Lewdrfefs, which afterwards,
like a Leprofy, overfpread the Roman Em-
pire. The Confpiracies of that Time, which
. fb much endanger'd the State,were contrived by
Libertines, and no greater Cruelties have ever
been committed than by this Sort of Men,
when once they have got into Power ; as
may befeen in Tiberius, QdiguU, Nero, &c.
And -Tally himfolf perhaps might feel the Ef-
fects of tliefe Encouragements to Vice,' being
kill'd by a Villain, whofe- Life he had for-
merly faved by that Eloquence, which was
fbmetimes employ *d, as if he had been re-
tained againft Vertue.
It muft be owned that Tally has in many
places of his Works laid down admirable
Rules of Vertue, bul then it is with Jirtle
or no Regard to fuch Principles as are the
only
The Preface, xxvii
only fure Foundations of a. Vertuous Life,
pfe the Fear of God, and the Exp-tfation
of Rewards of Punifbmcnt, afrer Death ; *
aed fuch was the deleft of his Philofophy,
that he could \ be pofitive and certain in no-
thing. Seneca, as he profeffeth, has taken
many of his beft Precepts from Epicurus, which
without a due Confideration had' of a God
and a Providence, are no better than Pru-
dent Cautions againft Temporal Evils, either
of Body or xViind. Seneca many times di-
verts rather • than. Inftruclrs , what he
fays is always fine,., but not -always So-
lid, he dances •upon the 'furface, accord-
ing to t QmntHUnh* Cenfure of him, but fej-
dom delcerids ''-to the depth of things; and
it were well if that Character, which he
has given of Seneca s ftyle, might not be ap-
ply ed to his Seme, abnndat didcihus V it its, a
lufcious Poifbn fometims djffafeth it felf in
his Writings. Seneca (*) derides the fubtilty and (xisen.S-
trifling both of "Leno and Chryfippus ; but h«M«2. d§
did it feems, think himfclfj more concern ci f"cfcMf*
to expofe them for being Teachers of ill
Do&rins: tho upon this account they were
fo very fcandalous, that Sextus fxx) Emperi-
cus endeavours to prove from their Words, that smlir!* '
there is no real and certain Difference bc-?yrrh'&>
twixt Vertue and Vice. i ^ «?'
The bar.e knowledge of the Chriftian Do- ' ' :
6lrin even without a fincere belief of its
Authority, has taught Men to abhorr thofe
Crimes
1
xxviii The Preface.
Crimes which were approved of by the Phi-
loibpheis , and Pra&ifed in the Wifeft
* Heathen Mations : dnd when- things notori-
oufly Evil were fleceiy'd and taugh: by tho'e,
who did and faid fb many chinas well,
it is Evident, that what was good was not
owing fo much to the ftrength of rheir
own Reafon, as to fome higher Principle.
I will here give but one Tnitance, and it
fhall be concerni'Tg the Lawfulness of killing
Infants, or expofing them to be nerved or
ti\jJ, deftroyed. This was the. exprefs Docirine of
• 4 Cn) Plato; and • Aristotle who contradifts him
"it lib vi'ii. m m ^ ot^er things, follows. him ia this. In-
i6: 'deed this was fo general a PracUce, (V that
C*o xiu*. it is taken particular. Notice of tint the The-
WDiony}.b*»s had a Law to* forbiJ it., (p) Ro-
lib
Hxhc&m. ntulus' made a Law to regulate this Practice,
h(q %M: c™^ t0 hinder it in fbme Cafes ; (V Tacitus.
Hift. nb ixibf^rves itas a thing deferving his Remark,
efrf'Afor that this was not prattifed either b) thejem
'J™' ov tiie Germans, Jtho' the latter had a Cult 'in
of catting their Children into the Shine for
a tryaJ of their legitimacy. But that which
fr) ' • :-, rn ^re fhange is (r) that Seneca and Plu-
^/ whp livU fioce the Preaching of the
f'uiiiBfr ["; fhould approve of fuch Barbarous
3*; ', . C J Hierocles, who as LaJantius
.informs us, was .well acquainted w.ti tiie
is- Scri| -was contented to fay that it is
natural and anfwerahle to the "ends of
Mintage to bring up all, or at leaf!, mod
Children;
The 'Preface. xxix
Children; which was a great Conceffion in
a Philofopher. Solon was as Famous for his
.Phibfophy as for his Laws* and the Legifla- *
tor to that State, which was the Seat and
pioper Soil, as it were." of -Philofophy, by an
exprefs Law (*) indemnifyed all that kilted . _ ,
their Children, and the Philoicphers were ever fej»&..'
true to thefe Principles.' *?w/*"
I have infifted upon this the more not on- $24.
ty becaufe it is an evident inftance of the
infufficieney of Heathen Philofophy, but be-
caufe fome Readeis may be as difficult to
believe a thing, wliich tnuft rieedi feem ve-
ry Monftrous.to Chriftians, as (l) LipfutsS (t)AiBeU
Friend was, to' whom he wrote a long Epi- gascent.u
ftle, to convince him that this was the Pra- W« 85«
.clice of Heathen Nations, and agreeable to
the Judgment of their Philofophers : So that
many of the Adverfariesof the Chrifttan Faith,
may perhaps owe their Lives to that Religi-
on which they -Blafpheme.
I have purpofely avoided too curious an
enquiry into the lives of %t;;e Philofbphers,
and father chofe to caft.a'Veil over what
not only their Enemies but their Friends have
faid of them. The Practice of Ivjen is ge-
nerally worfethan they confeft it ought, to
be ; they never live above their Rule and Pro-
feflion ; it is well if in moft things, they
do not fall much fhort of it ; and if their Princi-
ples be Bad, what mud: we^expecl from their
Examples? But the A&ions of the Philofo-
phers
XXX . The Preface.
phers concerned thofe with whom tfiey lived,
our Buhneis is with their Writings ; and I
* need not fear tlfe Cenfures of Learned and
Judicious Men 'in any thing I have faid of
them;for'they will acknowledge it to be Truth,
and others ought to. be told fo, that they
be no longer willing to change the Bible
for the Works of Philofophers, which they
commonly read and underftarid as little as
they do the Bible it felf. •
The utmoit- that Philofbphy could reach,
was'no farther than to uncertain Hopes and
doubtful Arguments. But. our Saviour and
his Apofrles taught, with Authority \ and not as
did the Philofophers ; The Words which' they
/pake, they0 pere Spirit, and they tvere Life ;
They came with full Power, and had their
Credentials from Heaven to produce, which
are the fame that we now allege for the
Authority of their Comniiffion. And what
can be more certiin than" plain Matter of
Fact, which is clearly prev'd by undeniable
Circum fiances-, end by WitnefH-s beyond Ex-
ception, and whicn is of that Nature, that all
the Divine Attributes are engag'd fqr the
Truth of* it ? It is ftrange that Men fhoiild
pretend to fetch their Infidelity from the
Depths of Philofbphy, and the Oracles of
Reafo/t; as if any floating, confusVJ Notions
migh't not fci ve for obje&ions.But it is to the ad-
vantage of a bad Cauie, to involve it in tedious
and unneceiTary Difputes, to make Digreflions
into
i
>
Tlje Preface. xxxi
nto doubtful Points of Criticifm and Philofo-
)hy, to amufe the Reader, and draw him off
rom the main Queftion: Whereas a good *
£aufe may commonly be brought to a clear
md fhort IfTue. The prefent Controversy
will admit "of. all kinds of Learning, but has
10 need of it. My Bufinefs therefore has been
:o free this Matter, as much as may be, from
all the Intricacies of Learning, to reduce
it to plain Circumftances of FacT:, whereof
every man may be capable of making a true
Judgment, and to bring it to that very Cafe,
in which St. John argues; He that believeth
not God hath made him a Lyar> becaufe he be*
lieveth not the Record that God gave of his
Son* i John v. 10.
And *how can we forbear to adore the
Wifdom and Goodnefsof God, who by the
wonderful Difpenfations of his Providence,
has not fuffered himfelf to be without Witnefs
in any Age or Nation ? If Idolatry fpread itfelf
from Egypt mto many other parts of theWorld,
as (*) Herodotus and Diodoxus Siculus have (X^ffer0^
fhewn, we have the more reafbn to admire the ub.n e.
wifdom of divine Providence in appqjntingE^/ *}'®?'ut
to be the place where the People of 1 fracl did \l *"' % '
folongfoJGurn, and where fo many fignalMira- ■
cles were wrought to give a check and ftop to
Idolatry in the very Source and Fountain of
it, if. Men had not. been beyond all meafure
obftinate in their Fojly and Dilbbedience.
And
xxxii The ^Preface.
And the fame goodneis of God has not been
aOcw/fe wanting to any Nation of the World. For^Otho*
y?t iW the Law of mofes was peculiarly defjgned for
pfnth tne People of Ifracl, yet provifion was made
; &t for the receiving of all iuch as were wil ;
****}**• to becorhejsartakers of it, to .the obfervation
n\".'' even of their ceremonial and typical Service;
« -^ none betides the Ifraelites were required to
6" obferve it, but neither were any excluded from
,:..- it; And by the constitution of "the Jeivijh'LsLW
* - and Government, as wclj as by the Providence
T$<%m£ cf Gad. in all his Difpenfations towards that
9 t*&ni( 1- People, effectual Care was taken that all the
<ra.v of)/- neceifary points of Religion which concern
c- h ankmd in general, inould by them be com-
7«T? sr'aet municated. to the reft of the World. But the
vla*9£ Chriftian Religion was by its origfnal Infti-
7«s k*ta tutiori and Defign equally extended to all Na-
^vX™r tions, and was foon propagated all over the
-fc.AthaiTWorld; Nations but lately known to us have
^/wir-beetl conftant objects of the Divine Care, and
rlrl'iDi n3^ earty Discoveries made to them of the re-
' vealVJAVi!! of God, as I have proved at large
by the Testimonies of Proteftants as well as
of Papifts. And it is very cbfervable, which'
Co) raren. (a) Varemns has remark'd, that the Jefuits,
de Rtrvjn fa yom piAces at iea^ ]iave Preached the fub-
p'm.'c. fiance of Christianity without the' mixture of
many of thofe Dcctrins, which are peculiar.
to the Roman Communion; and he owns
that their Succefs has'been very great.
III. It-
The Preface. xxxiii
III. It (w) was the opinion of a convert- W^
ed Mandarine, That thofe who had any occafon china.
to heir the Law of Gody or to read the Books pan. *.
which treat of it , and did not judge it to bec% *3"
true , wanted Brains^ and were void of Under-
fianding. And it might well be thought in-
credible, if we did not find it true in Expe-
rience, that when Chriftianity has gained (b
much upon Heathens, and (x) Turks have^^v^/t
become its Proftlytes and Martyrs , even in nift. cf
Confiantinofie it felf ; it (hould notwithftand- ^ ££
ing grow into Contempt among profefs'd /;*.2.f i*>
Chriftians, whodifpute every Article of the12-
Faith, into which they were Baptized, and
every Commandment , which they have un-
dertaken* and (blcmnly vowed to obey.
But do they not prove what they pretend ?
As little of that as may be * but they fay it,
and fey it often and confidently, and perhaps
(bmetimes wittily, and this muft pais for
Proof. But do Men love, or will they endure
to be talk'd or jefted out of any thing that
is dear to them but their Souls ? Let the
Wit be what they pleafe, or can fancy it to
be, certainly they muft be milch too fond of it
who can be Contented to lofe hot only their
beft Friend, but Heaven it (elf for ajeft;
which perhaps, after all, would be little taken
notice of on another Subject, and has nothing
to recommend it but Profaneneft, and that a-
lone which fhould make it abhorr'd, caufet&
it to be admired.
* J*
«xxiv The Preface.
As there is nothing fb bad but fbme may
pretend to fpeak for it (as a Panegyrick has
• been written upon'Bu/ir/s, an i another upon
Nere fb not ing is fo excellent but it may be
fpoken againft ; and if no Right or Title muft
be aPoved as true or certain, which may be
quelt oned or diiputed, it is hard to fay what
any Man can have that he may call his own.
But let it-be confider'd that there is little Learnr
ing or Judgment rtqui ed in advancing or
maintaining new and Itrange Doctrines, and in
rejecting the old. Things may be fb plain, as
for that very Reafbn to be hard :o prove, be-
caufe there is not ing plainer to prove them
by ; a bold denial of the truth of our Senfes
and Faculties may fecm to promife fomething
of more than ordinary fubiilty ; though there
be no more in it than this, that he who re-
fblves to deny the vcy grounds and foundati- *
ons of all Reafbning, has taken effectual care
not to be confuted. It is a miftake to think
that it is eafiefl: to fpeak upon a common
Subject ; a Man indeed can never want fome-
thing to fay upon fuch a Subjed, but he is
prevented in what hefhouldfay, it is known
before-hand, and expe£ed from him : The
niceft thing of all is to enforce and improve
• known A'guments, and to give new Life, and
abetter Genius, as it were, to that which has
been laid* a thoufand times before. It is ufu-
ally eafieft to difcourfe on the wrong fide of
% Queifton, becaufc there never is fo little fcope
» for
The Preface! xxxv
for Fancy and Invention, as when a Man
is confined to ftritl: Truth ; Error will admit
of all Extravagancies, but Truth is a fevere and
uniform thing, and there are thofe Whom a-
ny Extravagancy almoft will pleafe, for t! e no-
velty of it. There may be fome Art required
to make a known Story delightful in the rela-
ting, but News is commonly welcome, tho*
it be never fo ill told, and tlje moft beauti-
ful and ufeful Creatures are little regarded,
when the word: of Monfters are the more ga-
zed at the more they be deformed. Let
thofe who make fuch anoile with their Sin-
gularity, but change the Subject, and try how
it will fucceed with them, they will fbon find
the difference, and perceive that they will
ceafe to be in vogue, when they have no lon-
ger the vanity and ill nature, and vices of Men
on .their fide.
It is with our Minds in this reipecl, as it is
with our Bodies , when once they are well
fupplied with all that is necefTary or convenient,
they begin to loath wholefbme Food, and to
feek out for varieties of Luxury, and are fond
of any thing that may pleafe them to their
hurt. It is thus in every Art and Science^
efpecially in fuch as all Men think themfelves
more or lefs concern'd to know- Men firft
were contented to fpeak fb as to be underftood,
and to expreis their meaning plainly and na-
turally with Truth and Simplicity to one a-
nothef i afterwards Ipeaking became an Art,'
a 2 and
xxxvi The Preface.
and at laft in the beft and mod elegant Lan-
guages, it degenerated into nothing but Af-
fectation, and all the ridiculoufnefs of a ralfe
Eloquence. The fame thing happened in Phi-
lofophy ; the Scepticks carried this*innovating
humour to the utmoft Extravagancy , for,
the Primitive Traditions being obfcured and
corrupted, and every 'Succeffion of Philofo-
phers driving to fet up for themlelves, and
to outgo each other, they had brought it to
that pafs, that Taffy ^ who knew as well as a-
ny Man, fays, that nothing can be more ab*
furd than what fomeof the Philofophers held,
but the Author of the Leviathan proceeds far-
. ther, and obferves that (x/ no Living Creature
ath, pm ?s f'bject to the Privilege of Abfurdity but
i.e. 5. Man only , and of Men, thofe are of all mofi
f abject to it that profefs Pnilofophy. And if we
will not believe him upon his word, he has
given us his Example for it ; few Men , I
think, having written more extravagant things
than he has done in every part of Philofophy ;
if Religion were fet afide, he would never
have efcaped among the philofophers and Ma-
thematicians of any Age 5 he difputed the
Principles of Geometry, as well as the Foun-
dations of all Religign, and both with a like
Succefs. He calls ■■ Abfurdity the Privilege of
Mankind, a ftrange Privilege ! which he has
made the mod of. But fince with a little time
the Novelty and Varnifh of his odd Opinions
are worn off, they are not now, that I have
per-
The Preface. xxxvii
perceived, fo much regarded, but have been forc-
ed to give way to other Notions which are
as Bad, and have nothing more to recom-
mend them, but that they are of a later Date
and a newer Fafhion.
There is little Reafbn why any one fliould
value himfelf for talking againft received
Do&rins, and perfuading others to what they
are already but too much inclin'd. But to
refcue Antient and defpifed Truths, and bring
them into Reputation ; to convince the Judg-
ments, and gain the Affe&ions of Men, to
make the fame Truths always pleafe and al-
ways appeal' with a new and amiable Lu-
ftre ; this is indeed a difficult Task. For k
Man to cultivate the Principles of Vertue,
and improve the Growth of it to make every
fubje£t, which he treats of to become the bet-
ter for him, and to thrive and flourifh uncjer his
Hands, is an Argument of true Learning and
fubftantial Knowledge ; but theie is no Skill
required to make the weeds of Vice grow a-,
pace ; all the Art is in deftroying them, and
it is a fign of a little Mind when one is a-
*bleto diftitfguifh himfelf only by Singularity,
by an odd Drefs, or a new Mode, when his
Wit borders upon Madnefs and Prophaneneis,
and his Learning is all out of the way. Ma-
ny who are neither Heterodox m Religion, nor
fond of heing fingularin any thing elie , have
fhewn an extraordinary Sagacity, and a fur-
prifing variety of excellent Learning upon Sub-
d 5 je£b
xxxviii • The Preface.
jects which are unufual and in themfelves but
little confiderable. And I will not deny
• but that fome of the Men of Singularity have
no Worfe Defign than to gratify a little Va-
nity, and to appear like fome body in the
Commonwealth of Learning, as if Learning
were a mere Trifle, a very Play-thing, to be
employ 'd to no ferious and ufeful Purpofe,
but would ferve only to give men occafion
to talk, and to be talk'd of. This is call'd
Pedantry and I know not why that fhould'
go under a better Name, which is of a worfe
Nature, and join the Trifling of Pedantry
to the Mifchief of Irreligion. If this Sort
of Men would but bufie themfelves no worfe
than Tiberius did, when he examined, who was
the Mother of Hecuba ; what Name Achilles
went by, whilft he hid himfelf in Woinans
Apparel, and what "Songs thofe were, which
the Sirens were wont to fing ; thofe indeed
are profound Enquiries, and fb worthy of
them, that it were pity they fhould be di-
.fturb'd in fuch ingenious Dilquifitions. But
if Men will be for removing Foundations, and
rejecting eftablifhed Doctrines, and denyjng
the Principles of Religion ; it is fit they fhould
be told, that there is neither Wifdom nor
Learning in this; and thofe who are acted
. themfelves by a Spirit of Contradiction, have
the haft Reafbn of any Men to take it amifs
' to be contradicted, tho' it be in never fb plain
a manner. In ffiort, it is pofTible that fome
may
I be Trejact. Xxxix
tnay be well SkiWd in Tricks and Artificer
who know little of the fubftantial and ufetul
Part of the Law, and it is certain, that many
who talk boldly of the highefl: Points of Re»
ligion, are ignorant even of the Principles of
tbe'Doctrinc of. Chrift. There furely can be
little need for any Man to have recourfe to
Error and Extravagancy for the exercifc and
improvement of his Faculties, they mult bo
ftrange Faculties to want fuch Improvement.
Truth it felf is infinite, thoJ always uniform
and confident in every part, and will afford
room enough for the free ufe of Reafbn, in
examining and confidering the Nature of
things, in ftating particular Giles by general
Rules, in the Study of Antiquity, and irt
explaining particular Texts of Scriptures, ac-
cording to the Analogy of Faith, and the
Tenour of (bund Dodrine* And it mayjunV. .
ly be look'd upon as a Defect of Judgment
and good Senfe, or be fufpe&ed (which is
much worfe ) of want of Sincerity and a
good Confcience,* wheh Men can find no-
thing, by which they tiny recommend t iem>
felves to the World, but by letting up for
Novelties in Religion, For what nun of
an honeft Meaning, and of fufTicient Abili- .
ties and ftrength of Parts, to proceed fecure-
ly in direct and approved Paths, would run
out of the way by Cunning and Artifice, to
fteal a defpicable Reputation, which another
Would be afljamd of, and of which* che beft
d \ thing
xl The Preface.
thing that can be faid, is, that, as it is never
worth the having, fo it is never lafting.
After the Reception and Eftablifhment of
theGofpel for fo many Ages, we are call'd up-
on to prove the Grounds and Principles of
our Religion all over again, and we will ne-
ver decline a thing fo eafy to be done- But
the * Modern Infidels have changed the
State of the Queftion : the Truth of the Mi-
racles wrought by our •Saviour and his Difci-
ples was never deny'd by the Adverfaries of
Chriftianity of old ; this was not difputed by
Celfus* Porpbyrie, Hierocles, and Julian the
Apoftate ; if fome of them did upon any oc-
cation' infinuate the contrary, that was fo ma-
licious and groundlcte a Calumny, that they
were neither able to infift upon any Proof of
it, nor to reconcile it to what they them-
(elves had elfewhere (aid. The Matter of
FacT: was acknowledged, &c was acknowledg-
ed by the antient Jews, and has been confeft by
their Pofterity ; they could not contradict the
Miracles, but denied the Confequence of therrr:
tho' the Men we have to deal withal, to make
clear work, with much Confidence, but with
as much Ignorance, deny both." Let them
know then, that they are in part confuted by
the Enemies of our Religion ; and it were
(trange if its Friend fhould fail in the other
Fart.
IV. I
The Preface. xl;
IV. I have here endeavoured to do fbme
Right to our Religion, and to fatisfy all fuch
as are willing to be fatisfled in the moft diffi-
cult Points of it. And tho* I have difcourfed
at large upon the Subjects of which I treat,
and not in the ufual Method of Objection and
Jnfwer ; yet I have always had my eye upon
the Objections, which I have known that I
could think at material. But to bring in
/ Objections at every Turn in plain Difcourfes,
fiichas thele weredefign'd to be, as far as the
Matter would permit, might have been of no
good Confequence. A man may very well be
guided in the right Road without having all
the wrong and dangerous Patfcs defcrib'd to
him ; and he may be directed how to recover
or preferve his Health without being prefent-
ed with a Catalogue of Difeafes ; he may get
fafe to his Journeys end, without knowing
all the Bogs and Precipices by wbich he might
have mifcarried ; and in order to be well, there
is no need that he fhould be acquainted how
many ways tfiere are of being fick. I have
heard of fbme that read Objections without
the Anfwers; as lately a fliamelefs Writer has
produced the Objections of Celfm and Fanjlus,
againrt the Canon of Scripture, without take-
ing Notice of the Anfwers given by Origen
and St. Auflin, from whom he had them. And
tho' both the Objections and Anfwers fhould
be read j yet Objections are commonly in few
"Words," and are often remembred, #when itie
Anfwers
xlii Tie Preface.
Anfwers are forgotten. And indeed, tho' I
were never (b Expert at it, I have no Ambi-
tion to try my fttength in tying a knot,
that I may fhew m\ Skill in unloofin^ it.
But to provide agair.ft all exceptions, as much
as it is poffible, I have, proved at large, that
if all Objections could not be anfwered, this
would be no fufficient Reafbn to reject or
cjueftion the Authority of our Religion.
I cannot fay I muft confefs, that I have
been able, or have been much fol'icitous to
obviate all the Cavils which may have been dar-
ted 5 many have been given up, and others feem
never to have been fciiouiJy urged. An Au-
thor who had more Learning it feems, than
Juigraent to fj)are, wrqte a Book to prove
that there were Men before Jdam ; but this
was rejected by Judicious Men as a very ab-
furd and Ridiculous Conceir, particularly by
Grot'tus, as the Author compl.tins, who yet
afteY wards retracted it himfelf Some not-
withftanding are fb fond of any Parodox
tlrat they are dill for miintainiog it. I con-
fefs it agrees admirably with a Tradition of
the Arctid'ans, that their Anccftors were be-
fore the Moon, and if any Man fhould pre-
tend, that this might very well be true, ac-
cording to the Carte/ian hypothecs, by attem-
pting to prove that drcadia migl t be inha-
bited before the Moon of a Luminous be-
came an Opake Body ; in fo curious an Age,
kt muft have ill Luck ii he Ihould warjt his
Ap-
The Preface. xliii
Applauders. If fome Objed, that the Origi-
nals of the Books of Scripture in the Hand-
Writing of the feveral Authors are not ftill re-
maining ; doth this deferve to be anfwered
till they can produce the Original Writings
of all other Books ? Or at leaft of ail or
any that are as Antient, as even the laft writ-
ten of the Books of the New Teftament ?
Would they have an Office erected to prove
the Titles to all Eftates by Original Deeds?
and upon what Period of time will they fix
for the Date of them, which will admit of.
any Comparifon with the Date of the Manu«
(cript Copies now extant of the Scriptures ?
Some have alleged that the Sea through
which the Ifraelites paffed is not Red : But
they may be pleated to know that Religion .
is nothing concerned in what has been writ-
ten on both fides upon this fubjecT, for it is
not called the Red Sea . in the Hebrew, but the
Sea of Weeds with which it abounds. It
has the denomination of the Red Sea from
the Greeks, however it came by it (Tor the
Criticks are not agreed about it J and is beft
.known by that Name, which is therefore
made ufe of by the Septuagint, and in out-
own and other Translations, which herein
follow St. Luke and the ApoPde to the He*
brews* Men mull: call things by known
Names if they will be underlrood,- whate-
ver gave the firfl: occafion to thofe Names.
As to many Objections let Men but do Mofes
the
xliv The Preface
the fame Right, which they would do
Thucydides or Tactttts, and we need defiie no
more, tho' they fhould not allow for the
great diftance of Time between them : In-
deed they might live in the fame Age, for all
that many of thefe Objectors know and be
next Neighbours. I have known divers Ob-
jections made, which the looking only into the
JJible would anfwer, and many proceed from
the want of being Converfant in it. Some
have fuppofed that they had great matter
'of Objection from Chrift's Curfing the Fig-
tree,#and caufing it to wither away : But ne-
ver fo little Reflection might ferve any one
to take notice how merciful a thing it was
in the Son of God, and how fuitable to the
Gofpel which he Preach'd for him to fhew
his Power of punifhing upon a Tree rather
then upon a Man : it was then and is at a-
ny time as eafy for him to punifh his Re-
vilers, as it was to Curie this Tree, or as it
can be for them to Revile him, tho' they
be never fo ready at it; But to manifefl: him-
(elf to be the Saviour not the Deftroyer of
mankind : He Cured all manner of Difeafes
and railed the Dead ; but never took away
the Life of any Man; nor inflicted any Difeafe,
he fpared his worft Enemies the Scribes and
Pharifees, and Punifhed their Hypocrifie in,
the Emblem only of a Fig-tree flourifhing^
in Leaves before the Time and Seafon of
Figs, and thereby promifing veFy much an fiar-
The Preface. xlv
ly Fruit but haying none * it made a fhow
of Figs out of Seafbn, but had nothing to
anfwer fo fair an Appearance.
Other Obje&ions which may feem more
considerable, have been confuted even to aW*
Demonstration. Cavils which have been rai- ^ e0m
fed concerning the (x) quantity of Matter, Prati. lib.
which will be required to Com pole the Bo-J^20^
dies of all Men at the Refurre&ion, and con-
cerning the (J) Rottomltfi Pit, have been de- (^f^
monftrated to be frivolous. That the («) Ca- iand'S °'-
Butt*
of Mankind might extend to Co great Num-^™
bers in no longer a Compais of Years than ,& &
the Scriptures in any Inftance Affign, are <*['• *&».
things which have been often proved beyond f<!fghf'R^
any poflibility of a Confutation ; and what- HijUib.u
ever force there may feem to be in Objecti- '•.?• J- *•
ens of this Nature, they are to be reckoned kiWi^i'
among the Vulgar Errors, and in that Num.- cbxnacr
ber Sir Thomas Brown has placed fome of them, rm 2,fv
for Learned Men have been long ago afha- (*##**
med to make them; and this, one would £)oSr'
think, fhould caule others to be more Modeft J^,^ *
and Cautious in their Objections againft the
Scriptures , when fuch as have #the Ap»
pearance of the greateft ftrength in them,
being once brought under ftrict Examination
prove to be evidently falfe. And if they
End they have been miftaken and are wil-
The Preface.
ling to be undeceived ; this will go fb far
towards their Conviction that I*cannot but
hope that the Confideration here propofed,
may be of fome weight with them.
Thus far, methinks,at leaft I may hope to pre-
vail upon thofe who will not be convinced
of the Truth of the Chriftian Religion, that
they will no longer imagine it Safe or Pru-
dent to fpeak lightly and profanely of it.
Religion is too ferious a thing, and of too
great Concernment to Mankind, to be ex-
pofed to the Scorn of every one, that thinks
he can make a Jeft. And that which is too
hard, for their Reafon will be in little danger,
of their Raillery, but will rather receive an
additional Confirmation from it. The beft
and mod (acred things are always moft Ca*
pable cf Difhonour and Affronts ; for to Ar-
, front and Abufe any* Perfon or Thing is to
endeavour to make it. appear bad, and it is
the fecurity of fome things and fome Men,
that they cannot be reprefented worfe than
they are. It is in any ones Power to Af-
front the greateft Prince, and a Man of the
molt eminent Vertue may be be moft eafily .
abufed, but no Trcafbn can be fpoke againft
a Beggar, and it is the hardeft matter to find
out how*to difgrace him of whom nothing
can be (aid worfe than he deferves. It is a
kind of Teftimony given to Religion, and
an acknowledgment paid to Vertue, when
Men lb induftricufly labour to villify k. For
how
The 'Preface. xlvii
fiow can that be difparaged which is of no
Worth or Excellency? Or why fhould Men
endeavour to bring that into difcredir, which
harh not at prefent a confliTed Reputation?
Whether this be a deferved Reputation or no,
they may queftion if they think fir, bur then
let them mike it a ferious queftion, and not
to be decided by the loudeft noife. But here
is the mifchief, they have no Patience to at-
tend to the Force of an Argument, or to go.
on with a diipute ; but a Cavil is foon ftart-
ed, and Objections arennore eafily railed than
anfwered upon any Subject, and then they
trample with wonderful Scorn, and Triumph
upon that which they conceive is fb miferably
overcome : but alaG the Victory is over them-
lelves; nothing is either the more or the lefs true
for their believing or disbelieving it, and Re-
lhj,ion is always the fame how profanely foe>
ver it may be fpoken of.
We have no defign to impofe upon any
Man's Faith; but if there be Reafon in*
what we hy, it may well be expected from
Reafonable Men, that they fhould hearken to
Reafon. Religion is. Reafon and Philofbphy„
as the Fathers often fpeak, t'le beft and trueffc
Philofophy. And I am perfuaded, how much
loever I may have failed in the performance,
that the Chriftian Religion is capable of, be-
ing proved with fuch clear and full Evidence,
even to ordinary Underftandings, as to make all
Pretences of Arguing againft it, appear to be as
ridiculous as they are impious.
THE
CONTENTS.
CHAP. I.
Of Humane Reafon.
THEDivine Authority of the Scriptures being proved in
the FirftBook, fuchP bints are cleared in ^Second,
a s are thought moft liable to exception in the Chrifiian Re-
ligion : But before Men 'venture upon Objections againfi
the Scripture, it is fit for them to confider the (trength and
compafs of their own Faculties, and the manifold Defects of
Humane Reafon. p. i . Infome things, each fide of a Con-
tradition feems to be demonfirable, p. 4. Every Man be-
lieves, and has the Experience of (ever al things, which in the
Theory, and Speculative Notion of ' them,*would feem as in-
credible, as any thing in the Scriptures can befuppvfed to be,
p. 1 2. Tkofe who disbelieve, andrejrcl theMifieries °f Re-
ligion, mufi believe things much more incredible, p. 24.
CHAP. II.
Of Infpiration.
ALL motion of Material things is derived from God-
and it is at leaf asconceiveable by us, that God doth
At? upon the Immaterial, as that HeAcls upcn the Material
part of the World j and that He may aft more powerfully
upon the Wills and Undtrfiandings of fome Men than of
Others, p. 28. Wherein the infpiration of the Writers of
the Scriptures did cenfifi , and how far it extended, p. 31.
Such Inferences from thence, as may afford a fufficient An-
fwer to the Objections alleged upon this Sub j eel, p. 41.*
The Infpiration of the Writers of the Scriptures, did not
exclude Humane Means, as information in Matters of
Facl,&CC. p. 42. It did not exclude the ufe of their own
Words and Style, ibid. Tho fometh'mgs are Jet down in
the Scripture indefinitely, and without any pofitivt Ajfer-
tion or Determination 3 this is no proof againfi their being
Written by pivim Infpiration, p. 43. In things which
( a ; might
The CONTENTS.
wight fall under Humane Prudence and Obfrvation, the
Spirit of God feems to have ufed only a directive ^ower
and Influence, p. 46. This infallible Ajflftance was not
permanent and Habitual, P. 49. Jt did not prevent Per-
fonal failings, p. 50. No PaJJage or Circumflance in the
Scripture Erroneous, p. 5 1 .
CHAP. III.
Of the Style of the Holy Scriptures.
THE Grammatical Confirutlion and Propriety of
Speech, p. 5:3. Thofe,whch are looked upon as
Drfetls in the Scripturc-Stylet were ufual in the tnofl ap-
proved Heathen Authors, p, ib. Metaphors and Rheto-
rical Schemes and Figures, p. 57. The Style different of
different Nations, p". 58. The Titles of King r, p. $ 9. What
Arts were ufed ]p> Orators, to rc'ift the Pajfuns, p. 6"o.
That they fome times Read their Speeches, p. 61. The Fi-
gurative Expref/ions of the Prophets, and their Types and
Parables, were Suitable to the Cujloms of the Places and
Times, wherein they Livd, ibid. Several things re-
lated as Matter of Fail, are only Parabolical Defcrip-
tions or Reprefentations, p. 64. The Prophetick Schemes
cf Speech, ufual with the Eaftern Nations, p. 66. The
want of Difiinguiflnng the Perfons fpeaking, has been a
great caufe of mifunderflanding the Scriptures, p. 68. The
Antiquity and various ways of Poetry, p. 69. The Mem
taphorical and Figurative ufe of Words, in Speaking of the
Works and attributes of God, p. 71. Tlje Decorum or
Suitablenefs of the matter in the Style of Scripture, p. 79.
The Method, p. 86. Some Books of Scripture, admirable
for their Style, p. 89. Why the Style not alike excellent
in all the Books of Scripture, p. 93.
CHAP. IV.
Of the Canon of the Holy Scriptures.
ANy Controversy concerning the Authority of fome
Books of Holy Scripture no prejudice to the reft,
p. 96. The unccntr everted Books contain all things ne-
ceffary to Salvation, p. 97. The Difpute concerning the
Apo-
The CONTENTS,
Apochrypha, falls not here under confederation, p. 99,
No Supprejfion or Alteration of the Books of the OldTefta
merit, by Idolatrous Kings, 6fC. p. ioo. The Book o
the Law, in the Hand -Writing cf Mofes, found in the
Reign of Jodsh, p. 102. No Books but thcfe which were
Written by Infpiration, received by the Jews into their
Canon, p. 103. What opinion the Ten Tribes had of the
Books of the Prophets, &C. p. ioj. Neither the Sama-
ritans, nor the Sadduces rejected any cf the Books of the
Old Teftament, p. 106. Of the Books, whereof men-
tion is made in the O. T. p.'ioC. Why the Books of the
Prophets have the Names of tie Authors cxprefi% and that
there was not the fame Reason, that the Names of the
Authors of the Hifiorical Books jhould be exprefi, p. ioST.
A wonderful Providence manifefi in the Prefervation of
the Books of the O. T. for fo many Ages, p. 109. The
New TeftameHt confirms the Old, p. f 1 1. The Caution
of the Chrifiian Church in admitting Books into the Ca-
non, ib. The Primitive Christians had fufficient means
to examine, and difiinguljh the Genuine and infpired Wri-
tings from the Apochryphal or Spurious, p. 1 1 3 . The Gof-
pel of St. Matt, in Heorew, how long preferved, p.t i£.
The Greek Verfion of it, p. 1 16. The Canon of Scripture
finified by St. John, and the Books of the other Evange-
li(ls, 6cc. reviewed by him, p. r 17. The Teflimony of
the Adverfaries of our Religion, ib. Copies of gremt An-
tiquity fill extant, p. 118. How it came to pafs that
the Authority offoms Books was at fir ft doubted of. p. 119.
The Canon had been fix d and confirmed in Councils in
Tertullian*/ time, p. i i 1 . The Canon of Scripture gene-
rally received by Chriftians of all Setts and Parties, p, 1 24.
CHAP. V.
Of the various Readings in iheOldzwclNswTejfamenty
AN extraordinary Providence manifefi in the prefer*
vation of the Scriptures from fuch Cafualties, a$
have befaln other Books, p. 1 15. The Defefy in the He-
( Hi) brvw
The CONTENTS.
brew Vowels , and the late invention of the Points no pre-
judice to the Authority of the Bible, p. 117. The change
of the old Hebrew Characters into that now in ufe, is no
prejudice to the Authority of the Hebrew Text, p. 130.
The Keri, and the Ketib, no prejudice to it, ib. Tht
Difference between the Hebrew Text and the Septua-
gint, trnd other Verfions, or between the Verfwns them*
felves, no way prejudicial to the Authority of the Scrip*
tures, p. 131. It is confeffed by the greatefi Critickst
both -Proteftants and Papijts, that no difference is to be
found in the fever al Copies of the Bible, which can preju-
dice the Fundamental Points of Religion, or weaken tht
Authority of the Scriptures, p. 13 *. No lefs may be fail
in behalf of the New Tefiament than of the Old. The
great care and Reverence, which the Primitive Chrifii*
ans had for the Books of it. Hereticks could not corrupt
the Text, and pafs tmdi[covered to the Orthodox, or even
~bj other Hereticks, p. 1 40.
CHAR VI.
Of the Difficulties in Chronology, in the
Holy Scriptures.
THe uncertainty of Chronology in general, p. 142.
Differences in Chronology, do not infer uncertainty
in the Matters ofFdft themfclves, p 143. They do not
infer, that there was any Chronological Mifiake made by
the Pen-men of the Holy Scriptures, p. 14$. The total
Term of Tears is not always exactly diftinguiflicd from all
the Particulars, of which it is compofed j and this has
been the occajion of Miftakes in Chronology, p. 146*
Another occafion of Miftakes has been, that jometimes the
Principal Number is fet down, and the odd or leffer Num-
ber is omitted, which is added to the Principal Number
in other places, p. 147. Sometimes an Epocha is mifla-
ken by Chronologers, p. 1 49 . T)je likenefs of two Words
may occafion Variations in Chronology, p. 150. The Nu-
meral Letters were eafily mifiaken by Tranfcribers, ib.
Some Alterations of the Septuagiat from the Hebrew
fcem
The CONTENTS,
feetn to have been made with defign, p. I > f . The Terms
of Time fometimes taken inchtfively, and at other times
excluftvely, p. 154.
CHAP. vir.
Of the Obfcurity of fame places in the Scriptures,
particularly of the Types and Prophecies.
HOw it comes to pafs, that there are fame things in
the Scriptures hard to be under flood, p. j £7. Some
DocJrins are difficult in themselves, p. 15; 8. The Learn-
ing and Wifdom of ancient Times confined in Proverbs
and Parables, p. 161 . Many places of Scripture, which
are obfeure to usf were not obfeure in the^iges when
they were written, p. 1 64. The main [cope and defign of
Parables is to be obferved, and not every word and cir~
cumftance to be infifted upon, p. 1 68 The Obfcurity of
Prophecies and Types confidered, p. 1 70. Differences in
the interpretations ofPhrophecies no Argument for the un-
certainty of them, ib. It is evident, astd agreed by Inter"
prefers, that Prophecies have been fulfilled, tho they dif-
fer about the Time when they were fulfilled, p. 171.
Some Prophecies pur pofely obfeure,. and why, p, 171. Some
Prophecies had never been conveyed down to Pofisxity, un-
left they bad been obfeure ly written, p. 175:. Others
could never ftave been fulfilled, ib. If Prophecies had
been plainer, it would have been thought that they had
been fulfilled only by defign and contrivance, p. 177.
Men would have committed Sin, yi many cafes, to fulfiU
Prophecies, ib. They may fometimes be ebfeure in Mercy
to Men, p. 178. And at other times for a Judgment
upon the Obftinate, p. 179. The obfcurity of Prophecies
defigned to abate the Confidence, and exercife the diligence
of Men, p. 1 80. Some Prophecies plainly delivered by
all Prophets ; thofe which are not fo delivered, of great
uft, even before the Accompliflnnent. Ihisfixwnof -the
Revelation of St. John, p. 1S2, TheNature and Certain-
ty of Types confidered, p. 177. Ihcobfcurttiei of Scrip-
tures is notfuch, as to be. any prejudice to the end und de-
fign of 'them, p. 180. CHAIJ,
The CONTENTS.
CHAP. VIII.
Of the Places of Scripture, which fcem to con-
tradict each other.
NO Reafon to expect that the Scriptures Jhould be fo
penned as to afford no jufplclon of Contra Jittien to
injudicious and rajh Men, p. 184. what Method ought
to be taken, to wake a true Judgment of any Author, p.
I $6. An, Objection may imply too much, as well as
prove too little to be of any force, p. 187, Contradictions
in Points of Chronology, and other things of little moment \
tho they fhould have happened by the fault and negligence ,
of Men, wcidd be no Argument againfi the Authority of
the Scriptures, p. 190.
CHAP. IX.
Of the Creation of the World, and the Prcfer-
vationofir. *
OF the Time, when the World began, p. 193. 7 here
is no Reafto tqfuppofe the World to have been at
firft made by Mechanical Laws, tho* it was preferved
according to ftfch Laws, p. 194. Sufficient Reafons may
be %lvcn for the Creation of the World in that manner,
which we find related in the Book o/Genefis, p. 196.
with refpeB to the Angels p. 200. with rtffefl to Men,
p. 203. The Prefervation of the World is not performed
according to Mechanical Principles, p. 108. The Mecha-
nical Hjpothefes grounded upon mijfake viz. that there is
always the fame Quantity of Motion, p. 208. that there
is a Plenum, ib» They fuppofe it more Worthy of God to
leave Matter and Motion to perform all by them f elves
without his immediate Interpofition and Afflftance, p. 2 10.
The Ordinary and Extraordinary, or Miraculous Works of
God confidered, p. 1 1 1 , The Laws of the Material, and
of the Moral part of the World, compared, p. 213. The
Mechanical Hypothcfes inconfifient with cur Duty of
Prayer to God, for deliverance in Sicknefs and Dangers,
p. 2 1 4. . The Mechanical Philofophy proceeds upon a mif
taken Notion of God, p. 2 1 ? /
' < CHAR
The CONTENTS.
CHAP. X.
Of other Habitable Worlds befides this Earth.
ALL things are alike eafy to God, yet Men are moff
inclined to admire and Glorify Him for the va fi-
nefs of his Works, p. 218. Wonderful Difcoveries lately
made upon Earth by Microfcopes, as well as by Tele-
fcopes, in the Heavens : But Angels, who have no need of
artificial Helps to difetrn them, glorify God for his Works,
more than Men, p. 219. The ufe and benefit >of the Stars,
p. ib. Tloe Earth to be conjidered as the Seat of Man-
kind in alleges, under which Notion it is no contemptible
Place, p. 220. The Planets not inhabitable, ib. For
what ufes they may be dcfigned, p. 222.
chap. xr.
That there is nothing in the Scriptures, which con-
tradicli the late Difcoveries in Natural Philofophy.
THe ufe of popular Exprefjions implies neither the Af-
firmation, nor the Denial of the Philosophical Truth
of them, p. 224. How the Sun is faid to Hand Hill,
Jof. x. 12. p. 2 2 £. The Firmament in themidsl of the
Waters. Gen. 1. 6. explained, p. 226. The Sun and the
Moon how faid to be Two great Lights, Gen. 1. 16. p.
227. The Pillars of the Earth, 1 Sam. 11. 8. p. 229.
The Sky-ftrong, and as a Mult en Looking-Glafs, Job.
xxxvii. 18. ib. The Scripture fpeaks ftriclly according
to Philofophy, p. 230.
CHAP. Xlf.
Of Man's being Created capable of Sin and
Damnation.
THis repugnant, neither to the Juftfce not Mercy of
God, p. 251. The Objection rightly ftated, p. 2 3 3 .
The Glory of God is more advanced, and the Attributes of
hisWifiom and his Juftice, and of his Goodnefs it felf,
are more difplayed by leaving Men to a freedom of Acl-
ing, than they would have been by Impofigig an inevita-
ble Fate upon Mankind, p. 234,. Freedom of ABion
( a 4 ) con-
The CONTENTS,*
conduceth mere to the Happinefs of the Bleffed, than a w
ccjjity of not Sinning could have done, p. 237.
CHAP. XIII.
Of the Fall of the Angels, and of our firft Parents.
THE Fall of Angels how caused, p. 243. The Fall of
Man. The ejfefts of it Vifible, however the Thing
maybe difputed, p. 244. No Preexi fence of Souls, ib.
Eve beguiled by the Serpent, p. 14.6. The Sin of Eating
the forbidden Fruity p. 149. Many Circumftances o-
mitted in the Scripture concerning the State of our Firft
"Parents in Paradife, and relating to their Fall, ib. Why
a Cowman Intent was given them concerning a thing of
an indifferent Nature, p. 150. The Curfe upon the Ser-
tent, p. 154. The Curfe of the Ground, p. 255. The
P. -:r foment of cur Fir ft Parents, p. 2 5; 6. The Fall not
Allegorical, p. 374. The effecls of it upon allPefterity,
P« 37*r
CHAR XIV.
Of the Eternity of Hell Torments.
THE Eternity of HtllTorments confiftent with thefts
(the of God, because (1 ) Rewards and Punifoments
are a like Propofed to our choice, p. 383. (t) The Re-
wards are Eternal as well as the Punifoments, p. 384.
('3) It was necejjary that theSanclion of the Divine Laws
fouuld be by eternal Rewards and Pum foments, p. 387.
(\ ) It is necejjary that eternal Punifomtnts foould bs in-
flicted upon the Wicked according to this Sanction, p. 388.,
Objections obviated, p. 359. The Eternity of Hell Tor-
mev:s confftent with the Mercy of God. p. 3 6 2 .
CHAP. XV.
Of the Jewifh Law.
OF the Judicial Laws, p. 369. Of the Ceremonial
Laws, p. 271. They were given to prevent Ido-
latry, p. 341. To fi?nify and reprejent inward Purity
and Holinefs,'p. 344. This fhewnofCircumei/jon,p.^^iy.
Of Purificafwnj, p. 346. Of Ab(tinences,p. 346. Of
Sacrifices and Oblations, ib. Tbt Jewifh Wbrjhip was
Typical
The CONTENTS.
Typical cfChrifi and his Gofpel, p. 347. This proved of
Sacrifices, p. 348. Purifications, p. 350. Incenfe, ib.
During this Ceremonial Difpenfation, there was afuffi-
dent Revelation of the Internal and Spiritual part of Re-
ligion,p.$ > 2. Tlie Love ofGod,and of their Neighbour, ib.
A Future State, p. 3 5 3. the Refurretlion 3 p. 3 j 4.
CHAR XVI.
Of the Ceflation of the Jewijfj Law.
THETypes of the Law fulfilled in the Meilias. p. 3 32.
'The grange Evafions and abfurd Opinions of the
Jews, ib. It was foretold by the Prophets, that the Law)
was to ceafe upon the coining of the Median, p. 33 j. It
was afterwards to become impracticable, p. 323. • How
it is to be underfiood that the Mofaical Law was to
endure for ever, p. 324.
CHAP. XVII.
Of the Sinful Examples recorded in the Scriptures.
SEveral Places of the Scriptures, relating Evil A-
tlions, contain only matter of Faff, p. 317. The
Rules of Good and Evil, by which we are to judge of
Actions are plainly delivered in the Scriptures, p. ib. The
Relation of the bad Alliens of Good Men, maybeofufe.
1 . To (hew the Sincerity of the Pen-Men of the Scriptures,
1. To difcover the Frailty of Humane Nature, and the ?ie-
cejjity of imploring the Divine Grace, 3 . To jhew that
God can bring Good out of Evil, p. 3 28. 4. For the Glory
cf God's Grace, and for a Warrimgto future Ages^ p. 329.
CHAP. XVIII.
Of* the Imprecations in the Pfalms, and other Books
of the Old Tefiament.
MAny of theje Exprejjions are ufed in reference to
the Nations y on whom God had Commanded the
Israelites to execute his Judgments, p. 331. David be-
ing a King,was a Revenger to executeWrath upon him
that did Evil. p. 332. It is Lawful to Pray, that Ma-
lefactors may be punijhed, ib. TJk Jews might appeal to
God as their Political Legiflator and G ever new , p. 333.
Thoje
The CONTENTS.
Thofe which fe em Imprecations, are oftentimes Yreditli-
ems, and Denunciations of Judgment, p. 334. Divers
T laces are to be undejftood of J ndas, or of others like him,
p. 3 3 6. This fuppofition is implyed in Imprecations, if
they will perfift in their Sins, if they will not repent,
ib. What Charity was required under the Law, and
what was meant by the Word Neighbour, p. 3 3 7.
CHAP. XIX.
Of the Texts of the OldTeftament cited in the New.
THe Apofiles cited in the Scriptures of the Old Tefta-
meni according to the Expojition of thsm then ac-
knowledged by the Jews', p. 340. A remarkable Paf~
fage from F. Simon to this purpofe, p. 342. The Epifile
to the Hebrews much admired by a learned Jew, for the
fublime Senfe therein given to the Texts of the Old Tcfta-
ment, ib.
CHAR- XX.
Of the Incarnation and Death of the Son of God.
I ' I ^He necejfity of the Incarnation of the Son of God
1 confidered, p. 344. i.Tho'itjhouldbefuppofed%
that God could have pardoned the Sins of Men upon other
Terms, yet the Incarnation and Death of the Son of God
is fo far from implying any thing unworthy of him, that
no other way of our Reconciliation with him ( as far as
we are able to apprehend ) could fo much have become th*
Divine Wifdom and Goodnefs, p. 3 45. 1 . There is nothing
in this whole Difpenfation unworthy of God, p. 346. which
is proved by jhewing, (1) The unreafonablenefs of this Sup-
f option, that the Union of the Divine and Human Nttture
in Chrifi jhould caufe th< God head tofuffer with the Alan-
hood, p. 3 4 j. {y)The Humiliation of the Son of God in
affirming our Nature may be accounted for without Juppo-
fing, that the Godhead fujfered, p. 350. (3) The Satis-
faction of Chri(l by Dying for our Sins, may be explained
without fuppofing it, p. 35 1. 2. No other way (as far as
we can apprehend ) could have been fo proper and expe-
dient, as the Incarnation' of the Son of God to procure the
Salva-
The CONTENTS.
Salvation of Mankind p. 357. (1) The Dotlrin and
Treaching of the Son of God -was of more Tower and Au-
thority, than the Treaching or Dolhin of a Man or Angel
could have been, p. 358. (z) His Example is of greater
Terfetlion and Holinefs, p. 360. ($) His Mediation and
Inter cejfwn is of greater efficacy, ^^61. {^,)TheIncarnation
and Death of the Son of God is the moft effectual means ta
excite in us Faith, Hope and Charity , and to difpofe and en-
gage us to all Vertue andTiety, p. 364,.
CHAP. XXI.
Of the Fulnefs of Time, or the Time appointed by
God for the Incarnation of our blefled Saviour.
GOd had before-hand ufed all other means, to flew the
nectjftty offending his Son at laft, p. 371. The Re-
ception of the Gofpel had been much more difficult , if it had
not been foretold in fo many fever al Ages by the Trophets%
p. 3 74. The Time of ChrifFs coming might depend upon the
Duration of the World, p. 375. The World was then pre-
fared^r his coming, p. 370. The particular Temper and
Diff option of that Age / in which jur Saviour was born9
made it the mofi feafonable, p. 380.
CHAP. XXII.
Of the laft Days, and of the laft Day, or the Day of
Judgment.
THE laft Days of the World feldom mentioned in ex-
prefs Terms in Scripture, but under the Refem*
blances of other Events, p. 384. The Deftruilion of
Jerufalem, Typical of the Day of Judgment, p. 385.
This appears from Matt. 25. ib. The laft Days of the
Jewiftl Difpenfation, p. 388. The Times of the Gofpel
meant by the laft Daysx p. 389. St. Paul did not fup-
pofe that the Day of Judgment was approaching in his
time, p. 3 9 1 . There is no reafon to fuppofe, that the laft
Judgment mu(l be confined to one Day, p. 393.
CHAP.
The CONTENTS.
CHAP. XXIII.
Of Sacraments.
THE Nature and dejign of Sacraments, p. 39<5".
I. They are outward and Vifible Signs of our En-
trance into Covenant "with God, or of our Renewing our
Covenant with him, ib. 2. Tiny are Tokens and Tied'
ges te us of God's Love and Favour, p. 401. 3. They
are means and Inflruments of Grace and Salvation, p.
404. 4. They are Federal Rites of our Admijjion into the
Church, as a Vifible Society, and of our Union with it,
asfuch, p. 40^. The Sacraments of Baptifm, and the
Lord'* Supper fully Anjwer the end and Defgn of the In-
stitution of Sacraments, p. 407.
CHAP. XXIV.
Of the Bleflfcd Trinity.
THere is no Contradiction in this Miflery of our Reli-
gion, p.4 1 2 . TloeDijlinHion of the Three Perfons in
the Deity p. 41 3. The Unity of the Divine Nature, p.
414. The Difference between the Divine Ferfons and
Humane Verfons, 417. Other things are and mu&be be-
lieved by us, which are as little undo food, as mk Do-
Brine, p. 42 r . The neceffity of%hc Belief of this Docirint
explained and Defended, p. 423. This Doclrme exceed-
*n&fy feK<ls t° fhe Advancement of Vertue and Holinefs,
and has a great Influence upon the Lives and Ccnverfa-
i ions of Men, p. 427.
CHAP. XXV.
Of the Refurre&ion of the Dead.
GOD is certainly able to raife the Dead, p. 43 r. Bo-
dies after their Corruption, and the Dijjoluticn of
the Parts, which Comptfe them, may he reftored to Life,
by the Reunion of theft Parts agt'm, p. 436. We may
rife again with the fame Bodies, which we have here,
notwithstanding any change or Flux of the Parts of
cur Bodies, while we Live, cr any Accidents after
Death, p. 437. It is not only credible and Reafonable to
believe that God can, hut likenvifc that he will raife the
Dead, p. 44^- CHAP*
The CONTENTS.
CHAP. XXVI.
Of the Reafons why Chrift did not fhew himfeif to
all the People of the Jews, after his Refurre&ion.
^VHere are Reafons peculiar to this Difpenfation of his
Refurretlion, why Chrift jhculd not ^ew himfeif to
all the People, after he was rifenfrom the Dead, p. 44.9.
It had not been fuitable to the other Difpenfations of God,
towards mankind, for him to have done it, p. 451. Great
Numbers oftheJcvJS beinggivenover to hardnefs of Hearty
would not have believed, tho they had feen Chrift after
his Refurrection, p. 452. If the Jews bad believed in
Chrift, their Conversion had not been a greater Proof of
the Truth ef his Refurretlion, than their Unbelief bfts been,
p. 453. T/oe Power of ChrisTs RefurrecJion manifefied
in the Miraculous Gifts beftowed upon the Apoftles, was
as great a Proof of his Refurrection, as the Perfonal Jtp-
yearance of our Saviour himfeif could have been, p. 454*
CHAP. XXVII.
Of the Forty Days, in which Chrift remained upon
the Earth after his Refurrection, and of the man-
ner of his Afcenfion.
MAny things in the Life ofChriji before his Paffion
omitted by the Evangelifts, p. 459. And like-
wife after his RefurrecJion, p. 46 1 . What may be ccn~
eluded from that which we Read of his converfng with
bis Dijciples after it, p. 463. The maimer of his Afcen~
fion, p. 4<Sj.
CHAP. XXVIII.
Why fome Works of Nature are more efpecially af-
cribed to God j why means was fometimes ufed
in the Working of Miracles, and why Faith was
fometimes required of thofe, upon whom, or be-
fore whom Miracles were wrought.
ALL Creatures acl with a conflant dependance upon
the Divine Power and Infiue?ice j but things may
he f aid more efpecially to be done by God himfeif, whereby
*pon fome extraordinary Occafion, his Power, and his WW,
are more particularly manifefied) vr his Promife fulfilled,
p. 4S9.
The CONTENTS.
p. 469. Miracles are more peculiarly the Works of God-,
becaufe they are wrought without the concurrence or fub-
fervimcy of Natural Means, ib, Means ufed as Circum-
fiances to render Miracles more obfervable, not as concur-
ring to the Production of the effetl, 470. Chrifi had gi-
ven undeniable Proof of his Miraculous Power, before he
required Faith as a condition in fuch as came to fee his
Miracles, and to receive the benefit of them, p. 47 1 . Whe-
ther he required Faith of any before his working of a Mi-
racle, who had not already feen him work Miracles, p.
48 1 . Great Reafon that no Miracle (hould be purpofely
Wrought for the captious and Alalicious, p. 481. The
cafe of his own Country -men was particular, ib. The cafe
cf thofe who came to defire his Help, p. 487* Our Sa-
viour hereby fgnified, that he requires the fame Faith of
thofe who have not feen his Miracles, at he did ofthofe,
who had feen them, p. 489.
CHAP. XXIX.
Of the ceafing of Prophecies and Miracles.
Tile Antiquity of Prophecies adds to their force and
Evidence, p. 49 r . The Cejjation of Miracles.
We read of no Miraculous Power befiowed upon any Man
before Mofes, p. 491. Neither Prophecies nor Mira-
cles in the yewijl) Church for more than four hundred
years before Chrifi, p. 49 >. Miracles, ifco?nmon, would
lofe the defign and nature of Miracles, p. 498. Mm would
pretend to frame Hypothefes to folve them, p. 499. A
confiant PoWir of Miracles would occafion Impofiures, ib.
They would occafion Pride in thofe that wrought them, p.
501. No more Reafon for Miracles to prove the Chrifii-
an Religion among Chrifiians than there is need of them to
prove a God, ib. A Divine Power is notwithfianding
evident among Chri[Hans living in Heathen Countries^
p. 5:02.
CHAP
The CONTENTS.
CHAP. XXX.
Of the Caufes, why the Jews and Gentiles rejected
Chrift, notwithftanding all the Miracles wrought
by him, and his Apoftles.
A Supernatural Grace necejjary to True Faiths p. 5:04.
yews andVrofelytes were converted in great Num-
bers, p. 508. Many durft not own Chrift ; Others had
their hearts hardned, p. 511. They had violent prejudi-
Jices againft the Go/pel, p. 512. The Signs and Won-
ders offalfe Prophets a caufe of the Infidelity of the 'Jews*
p. 514. The unbelief of the yews being foretold by the
Prophets is a confirmation ofths Gofpel, p. £i£. Great
Numbers of the Heathens converted, p. 516. Ti/e caufe
of unbelief in the Philofophers, ib. Of Epictetus and
Seneca, p. 5 18. The prejudices of the Gentiles, p. $21.
They would not be at the Pains rightly to underftand the
Chriftian Religion, p. £22. Oracles had foretold .that it
jlmuld not laft abtve 36$; Tears, p. ib. Heretics and
Schifms gave great Scandal, p. £23. Many Heathens
however had ntore favourable and juft Thoughts of the
Chriftian Religion, p. 524. Of the Writings of the Hea-
thens againft it, p. 528. The Writings of the ancient
yews confirm it, p. 530.
CHAP. XXXI.
That the Confidence of Men of falfe Religions, and
their Willingnefs to futfer for them, is no preju-
dice to the Authority of the True Religion.
THe Martyrs for the Chrift ian Religion more numerous
than the Sufferers for any other, p. $31. Zeal for
Falftiood no prejudice to Truth, p. £3*. The preference for
the Chriftian Religion before all others, p. 5: 34. The pro-
per Notion cf Martyrdom, p. 535:.
CHAP. XXXII.
That Differences in Matters of Religion, are no pre-
judice to the Truth and Authority of it.
Differences in matters of Religion muft be, un'lefs God
fiiould miraculoujly and irrefiftikly interpofe to pre-
vent
The CONTENTS.
vent them, p. $39. It is not neceffary that God flwuld
thus interpcfe, p. 544.. nor expedient, p. $46. Thefe
Differences, how great, and how many foever they may
bey are no prejudice to the Truth and Certainty of Reli-
gion, p. 5:49. All Parties are agreed in the Truth of
Religion in general, and of the Chriftian Religion in par-
ticular, p. 5:5 1. It is not Religion, about which Men dif-
fute, hut there is nothing hcfidcs in which Men have not
dif agreed, p. £ 5:5:. Prophecies are hereby full filled, p. J J 7.
CHAP. XXXIII.
Though all Obje&ions could not be Anfwcr'd ; yet
this would be no juft Caufe to rejeft the Autho-
rity of the Scriptures.
f A True Revelation may contain great Difficulties j
XIl and if the Arguments in proof of the Scriptures re-
main in their full Force, notwithflanding any Objeflionst
and no pofilive and direct Proof be brot4ght that they are
infuffcient, the Objections muft proceed from fome Mi(lake%
and ought to be rejected, as infignificant, p. 5:59. Tins is
f)ewn in Particulars, p. 5 6 r . The way of Reafoning, which
is made ufe of to difprcve the Truth find Authority of the
Scriptures, confdered in cafes of another nature, p. 563.
Difficulties can never alter the nature of things^ p. $06 ,
C HA P; XXXIV.
The Concluiion y conraining an Exhortation to a fe-
rious Consideration of thefe things, both from the
Example of the wli-ft and moil learned Men, and
from the intinitelmportance ofthe thingsthemfelves.
f /\ S wife and learned Men, as any that ever lived in
Jf\ the World, have fuffered Perfections and Martyr-
dom for the Chrijfian Religion,?. 568. The Caufes of Un-
belief among Chriftians ; Immorality, a Spirit of Contra-
diction, and (ingidarixy of Opinion, p. 569. It is aj every
Man s own Peril, if he make a rajh and partial Judgment ,
p. 5 70. This is too fericus a Subject to jejt and trifle with*
all, p. 574.
THE
REASONABLENESS
AND
CERTAINTY
O F TH E
Chriftian Religion.
BOOK II.
CHAP. I.
0 J. Humane Keafon.
HAving in the former Book proved the
Divine Authority of the Scsiptufes,-
I proceed in this to clear fuch points,
as are commonly thought moft liable to ex-
ception in the Chriftian Religion, and td
B " pro-
The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
propofe fome confiderations which may ferve
to remove fuch prejudices, and obviate fuch
cavils, as are lAially raifed againfr the Holy
Scriptures. But before men venture upon
making Objections againft the Scriptures,
they would do well firft to confi-
der the compafs and ftrerfgth of their own
Parts and Faculties, and to obferve in how
many things they daily find themfelves de-
ceived 5 how many men there are who un-
derftand much more than themfelves, and how
much folly and ignorance there is in the wifeft
men. 'Thofe commonly that raife objections
againft the Scriptures are as confident in the
management of them, as if they underftood
all things befides, and therefore conclude,
that muO: needs be falfe, which they do not
uriderftand 5 not confidering, how very rea-
fonable it is to fuppofe, that God mould
command and reveal many things, the Natures
and P^eafons of which we may not be able to
comprehend. This muft be granted by every
man who believes God to be infinitely wife,
but doth not think himfelf to be fo, and ac-
knowledged! Cod's foveraigqty over him.
For as he is infinitely wife, he may reveal
tilings above our capacities, and as he is the
fupaam Lord and Governor of the world, lie
may command us what in his infinite wifdom
he mall fee fitting, tho we may not perceive
the ECeafon and Dsfign of it. And yet this
is the utmoft, that upon a due examination,
many
of the Chriftian Religion*
many of the objections againft the Authority
of the Scriptures amount to, that there are
feveral things in them, of which fome men
think no clear account can be given, and o-
thers5 which feem to them unworthy of God.
Now what is the meaning of this Way of
obje&ing ? and where lies the force of fuch
Arguments but in this, that it is not to be
conceived, that God would reveal or com-
mand any thing, with which they are not
fatisfied, or which they cannot perfe&ly un-
derftand ? This is all the ftrength of this fort
of objections. There is all the Reafon in the
world' to believe the Scriptures to be the Word
of God, if they did not contain things, which
thefe men in their great wifdom think mould
not be there,if they were his word ^ which is
to make their own underftanding the meafure
and Criterion of Divine Revelation. And fome
have turned Scepticks for as good Reafons,and
others have been Atheifte upon the fame
Principles $ rinding as much fault with the
Syftem of the World,and the Order and con-
trivance of the -parts of it, as the Deift doth
with the Scriptures 5 they have renounced all
belief of a God, upon the fame grounds upon
which he disbelieves the Chriftian Religion.
To convince men therefore of the Narrownels
and Weaknefs of Human eReafon,I (hallmew,
I. That in fome things each fide of a Contra-
diction feems to be pdemonftrable. II. That
very man believes and experiences feveral
B 2 things
The Reafonallenefs and Certainty
things which in the Theory and fpeculative
Notion of them would feem as incredible as
any thing in the Scriptures can be fuppofed
to be. III. That thofe who reject the My-
fteries of Religion, muft believe things much
more incredible.
I. In fome things each fide of a Contradicti-
on feems to us demonftrable. Several inftances
might be given of this. I (Hall inftance only
in the divisibility of Matter. Nothing feems
more evident than that divifibility is effen-
tial to Matter, and that therefore all Matter
is divifible, fo that the leaft part oi Matter is
as divifible as the biggeft, becaufe the leaft
particle of Matter is Matter, that is, it is of
the fame Nature andEflence with the whole :
and all Matter differs only in Bulk, or Fi-
gure, or Place, or Reft, or Motion. It being
then oi the Nature of Matter to be divifible,
it muft ever be divifible, tho it be never fo
often divided 5 fingc it can never be fo divi-
ded, as to lofe it own Nature, or ceafe to be
Matter. On the other fide, it is demonftrable
that Matter cannot be infinitely divifible 5 be-
caufe whatever is divifible is divifible into
parts, and no parts can be infinite, becaufe
no Number can be (b. For all Number is
neceftarily in it (elf capable of being counted
or numbred, tho no Finite Being may be able
' to number it, aNumberlets Number is a con-
tradiction, it is a Number, which is no Num-
ber : therefore all Number muft be even or
odd,. •
cf the Chrifiian Religic?;,
odd, and muft be capable of Addition and
Subtraction, which is contrary to the Na-
ture of Infinite. For what is lcfs or great-
er has certain bounds or limits, and therefore -
cannot be infinite, or without any end or
bounds. Matter therefore cannot be divifible
in Infinitum , fince all Dlvifion is into
Parts, and all Parts are capable of being
numbred, that is, they are more or fewer,
even or odd. And it will not fuffice to fay,
that Matter can never actually be divided into
infinite Parts, tho it be capable of infinite
Divifion, fo as that there can be no end of
. its divisibility. For the Parts into which it
is divifible muft be actually exiftent, tho not.
actually divided : for nothing can be divifible
into parts which it hath not, and all parts
actually exiftent, whither they be divided,
or only divifible, are capable of being num-
bred, or muft have a determinate number,
and therefore cannot be infinite. But to fay
that thefe Parts of Matter are indefinite, but
not infinite, is only to confefs, that we know
not what to Tay of them : for they are inde-
finite in refpect to us, not in their own Na-
ture, we cannot determine their Number, or
what end there can be of dividing them, but
this is an argument of our own ignorance,
and proves nothing as to the nature ^of the
thing.
Again, nothing is clearer to every under-
(tanding, than that all the parts into which
B 2 the
Tk Keafonableitefs and Certainty
the whole is divided, being taken together
are equal to the whole : yet it feems many
ways demonftrable, that any (ingle part is e-
qual to the whole. I (hall give but one fuch
Proof of this, as may be mod obvious. It
muft be granted, that in any Circle a line may
be drawn from every point of the Circumfe-
rence to the Center. Suppofe then the Cir-
cle to be the iEquator, or a line drawn round
the Globe of the Earth, and that ten thou-
fand leffef Circles are drawn within the iEqua-
tor round the fame Center, and that a right
Line is drawn from every point of the Equa-
tor to the Center of the Globe $ every fuch
Right Line drawn from the iEquator to the
Center muft be of neceflky cut thro the ten
thoufand lefler Circles drawn about the fame
Center, and confequently there muft be the
fame Number of Points in a Circle ten thou-
fand times lefs than the iEquator, that there
is in the iEquator it felf. And becaufe there
may be a Circle drawn from any* point of the
Diameter, the lefTer Circles may be multiply-
ed to as many as there are points iu the Dia-
meter, which are innumerable, and therefore
the lea ft Circle imaginable may by this de-
monftration have as many points as the great-
eft, that is, it may be as big as the greateft,
or as big as one never fo many thoufand times
bigger than it felf. For all the Lines drawn
from the utmoft Circumference terminate in
the Center, which proves that the Center,
or
of the Cbriftian Religion.
or the lead Circle imaginable immediately
next to it, muft be equal to the Circumference
never fo much bigger than it. For to anfwer,
that the leffer Circles have as many points,
but not fo big as the greateft,is againlt the fup-
pofition, becaufe I fuppofe a line drawn from
every one of the leaft points of the greateftCir-
cle, thro the leaft Circle to the Center, and
the leaft points in the greateftCircle muft be as
fmall as any in the leaft Circle , there being
nothing in the nature of Circles or Points to
hinder it, and the every Line palling from
the Circumference to the Center, is fuppoled
to be of the fame bignefs in all its parts, and
therefore aW the Points of Interfe&ion muft
be equal with thofe in the Circumference-
This proves, that we may lofe our felves
in the (peculation of material things : for
when we once abftrad them from fenfe, and
confider them in the Theory, they become
inexplicable*: Becaufe our Faculties were ne-
ver defigned for fuch (peculations, and are
not made for them, nor are capable of them,
at leaft in this mortal ftate. But this is no
Argument that our fenfes rightly difpofed,and
in due circumftances, may deceive us in things,
which are the Objefts of fenfe, or that we
may be deceived in trufting to them. Becaufe
what is the objeft of fenfe, is the proper ob-
ject for us to judge of by notions derived
from our fenfes, or by the Informations
which we receive from them. Our Faculties
B 4 were
8 The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
were defigned not for meer fpeculation and
curiofity about matters, which perhaps it
is impoffible for us Creatures fully to compre-
hend, but for our ufe and welfare : they
were defigned to prevent our being deceived
in things which are the objects of fenfe, and
therefore all the abfurdities , which are
charged upon the Doctrine of Tranfubftantia-
tion, are truly urged, becaufe they are con-
cerning an object of fenfe j and all fuch
Maxims, as the part islefs than the whole, Sec,
rnuft hold true, when they are applied to ob-
jects of fenfe, tho it be paft oar underftand-
ings to conceive, how they mould be appli-
cable to things, which do not falj. under the
perception of our fenfes 5 for thefe notions
were implanted in us, to guide and dired us
in the courfe of this life 3 and we muft rely
upon them, when they are applied only to
their proper objects, rather than upon any
fpeculations, which are too nice and high for
our conceptions. And it is as abfurd to be-
lieve what contradicts our fenfes in an object
of fenfe, as to extend thefe Maxims to ob-
jects which are infenfibleand only in Idea.
The leeming domonftration of thefe, and
fuch like contradictions, arifes from the ap-
plying of the Maxims taken from Phyfical and
Material things , to Mathematical Idea's,"
which are in the mind only, and have no ev-
idence in the Nature of things. And the
fame abfurdities may be fhrted upon any o-
*' ther
of the Chriftian Religion. . p
thefrfubjecl:, by confounding the feveral No-
tions and Properties of things of different Na-
tures. That the whole is greater than part
of it is a Phyfical Axiom and obvious to fenfe,
but that Lines are formed by indiviiible Points,
is purely Mathematical Speculation, and the
work of Reafon. So again, that Matter is
divisible is an obje& of fenfe, but that divi-
fibility is infeparable from Matter is mere fpe-
culation,and a deduction which is made from
fenfe, of which our fenfes can give us no af-
furance, but that our Reafon may be miftakea
in it. And whenever we pafs the proper
bounds of eadi Faculty, and judge the of diffi-
cultiesjconcefning the objects belonging to one
Faculty, by abftra&ed Notions belonging to
another, we muft neceflarily fall into error
and confufion. And therefore this muft needs
happen, when we reafon about obje&s, which
we know only by Revelation, and which are
the Natural and Proper obje&sof none of our
Faculties.
There are proper .Notions and Maxims,
which belong to the Jeveral Natures anH
Kinds of things, and thefe muft of neceffity
fail us, when they are ufed about things of
another Nature.Thus if a man mould judge of
Sounds by his Ideas of Colours, or of Colours
by his Notions of Sounds, he might multiply
contradictions without end: and yet thefe
are not more different than fenfible objefts
are from infcnfible, and material from imma-
terial.
io 2 he Reafonablenefs and Certainty
terial. God may fee it fitting to reveal fuch
things to us, as are above our understandings,
but then we muft be contented to take his
word for the Truth of them, and not apply
our Principles and Maxims taken from things
of an inferiour Nature, to things of which
we can have no conception but from revelati-
on : which would be as abfurd as for a deaf
man to apply the Notion which he has of Co-
lours to Sounds, cr for a blind man to fancy,
that there is no fuch thing as Colours, be-
caufe he is told they cannot be heard.
And there muft be a due proportion be-
tween the Faculty and its object* For the Fa-
culties both of our Bodies and Mmds are con-
fined and limited in their exercife about their
feveral objects. The parts of Matter may be
too fmall and fine to be any longer difcerned
or perceived by fenfe. For only Bodies,
which are fo big as to refled a due quantity
of Rays to the eye, can be perceived by the
fight it felf, the quickeft and fubtileft of all
our fenfes. And as objs&s in their bulk are
fe'nfible, but are inferifible in their minute
parts 5 fo it is in the inward fenfations or
preceptions of the mind in refpedt ot its ob-
jects. We may puzzle and perplex ouY (elves
in the deductions, which may be made from
the moft common Notions. Nothing is
more certain and familiar to our Mirds than
our own thoughts that we think, and under-
ftand, and will, we all know, but vvhat is
the
of the Chrifiian Religion. i x
the* principle and fubject of thought in us,
and how our underftanding and will ad up-
on, and determine each other, is matter of
perpetual difpute.
The fumm of this argument is, that our
Faculties are finite, and ot no very large ex*
tent in their operations, but are confined to
certain objects, and limited to certain bounds
and periods. Both our Natural and Acquired
knowledge is converfant about certain kinds of
objects, and our Faculties are fitted and fuited"
to them, and 'from the properties and affections *
which we obferve in them, we form Notions,
and make Conclufious, and raife Maxims and
Axioms.Now if we apply our Natural Notions
to things which we know only by Revelati-
on, we muft be very liable to great miftakes
about them* For thus it is in things not
fo much out of the reach of our capacities,
and which are not of a fpiritual Na-
ture 5 if we frame fpeculative and abftracl:
Ideas from the Principles and Maxims which
are formed in our Minds from fenfible objects,
we may foon puzzle our felves, and feem fo
demonftrate contradictions , which demon-
ftrates only, that all arguments of this Na-
ture are vain and unconcluding. And there-
fore it muft be abfurd to reject the Myfteries
ot Religion, becaufe they will not come un-
der the Rules of Logick and Philofophy,
when they are acknowledged to be incompre-
henfible, and therefore not to be judged cf
as
I % The Reafonab/efs and Certainty
as to the Manner and Nature of them by. the
Rules and Principles of Humane Sciences.
What has been here alledged concerning
the Contradi&ious about the divifibili ty of
Matter is no more than has been generally
confeft by the beft Philofophers and Mathe-
maticians. And the excellent Mr Boyle hav-
ing produced the Teftimony of Galileo and
Des Cartes upon this fubjed, concludes with
(a) confi- this obfervation. (a)If then finch bold and
i™£*0™ * piercing Wits andfuch excellent Mathematicians
cihablenefs are forced to confefs, that not only their own
tf^ffi^Reafon, but that of Mankind may be faffed and
m, Se& a. non-plufs d about £>jiantity , which is an ob-
jeft of contemplation, Natural, nay Mathematical,
and which is the fibjeU of the rigid demon fir a-
tions of pure Mathematicians , why JJjould we thinly
it unfit to be believed, and to be acknowledged,
that in the attributes of God, who is effentially
an infinite being, and an ens fingulariiiimum 5
and in divers other divine things, of which we
can have 710 knowledge without Revelation,
there fljould be Come things, that our finite under-
(h) Sunt flandings cannot, efpecially in this life, clearly
enim plu- comprehend ?
j&ridem, H. Every man believes and has the experi-
fed paru.m ence °f kveral things, which in the Theory
ficut' lia'and Speculative Notion of them would teem
faifaquoq;as incredible, as any thing in the Scriptures
ter veriii- can ^c ftppoi'ed to be. It was well obferved
mtiia. by- C b)£>j/inti!ian, aad may be obferved by
Qu'nC1'- , any one that will" confider it, that very many
Inlhtut 1. J ' J . . J
+. c. a. things
of the Cbriftian Religion. .1 3
things are true, which fcarce feem credible,
and as many are falfe, which have all the
appearance of Truth } and yet the caufe of
unbelief in matters of Religion is chiefly this,
that we are hardly brought to believe any
thing poflible to be done, which we never
faw done, and judge of things not from any
principle pf Reafon, but from our own expe-
rience, and make this the meafure of what
is poflible to be, not considering that many
things may be altogether as poflible, which
we never knew done, and that we fhould
think many things impoffible, of which we
have the daily experience if we had never feen
nor kn own them to be. For what we have
• the daily experience of, # we are apt to
think very eafy, and fcarce fufped that there
can be any difficulty in it, but frame to our
felves fome kind of account of it, and pleafe'
ourfelves perhaps with a conceit that we
perfectly underftand it, and conclude, that
fuch and fuch things muft needs come to pafs,
from the caufies which we aflign. For when
a thing is common and, familiar to us, we
either take no pains at all to confider the na-
ture of it, or when we do obferve and con-
fider it, being alhamed to confefs our own
ignorance, we perfwade ourfelves, that there
is no fuch great difficulty in it, but fancy
we underftand the true Reafon and Caufe of
it. And if it were not for the carelefnefs of
feme in not minding the wonderful effects of
Na-»
14' Jhe Keafonablenefs and Certainty
Nature, and the Pride of others in fancying
that they are ignorant of nothing, which is
the cbnllant objeft of their fenfes, I am per-
that there are feveral things in the World,
which we* daily fee and experience, that
would feem as wonderful almoft as the Re-
furre&ion itfelf, or any Myftery in Religion*
The greateft Philofophers have been able to
give but a very imperfect account of the mod
ordinary and obvious things in Nature, and if
we had only a relation of them without any
tryal or experience, wc mould be inclin'd to
conclude them impoffible. The King of Slam,
it isfaid, would riot believe the Dutch Am-
baflador, but thought hi mfelf affronted, when
he was told by him, that in Hoi/and, Water
wou d become fo hard in cold weather, that
Men or Elephants might walk upon it, and
the relations of things in thofe Countries,
would have feem'd as ftrange to us,if thecon-
ftant report of men, who have been there,
had not made them familiar to us. It was
formerly disbelieved, nay abfolutely deny'd,
as abfurd and impoftible, that there could be
any fuch place, as that which is now known
by the name of America, or that the Torrid
and Frigid Zones could be habitable : No my-
itcry in Religion can feem more incredible to
any man, than thefe things did appear even to
Wife and Learned men, and if they had not
r^en found to be by Navigation, they might
have feem'd incredible ftill, for ought we can
tell,
of the Chriftian Religion. i§
tell, tho now we wonder at the ignorance of
former times, that they mould make any
doubt of them, and admire how they came
to lyefo long unknown, for thefe things feem-
obvious, when they are once difcovered, and
it would be a difparagement to us, if we could
not make as great difcoveries at home as thofe
do,who travel to the Ittdies.And if we will but
consider a little with our felves, we (hall find
that we may be at leaft as much mifta£eii in
our Philofophy about the things of another
World, as our Anceftors were for fo many
ages concerning fo much of this, and fhall
conceive it very poffible, that there may be a
Heaven and a Hell, tho we never fpoke with
any body, that had been in either of thofe
places, and that there may be a Trinity and
a Refurreftion, tho we were able to give no
account of them. For Nature it felf exceeds
our comprehenfion, and therefore the Divine
EfTence, and the Almighty Power of Cod
muft needs much more exceed it.
The motion of the Heavens, and of the
Winds and Seas,the light of the Sun and Moon
and Stars,the conception and birth of all Crea-
tures, nay the growth of Corn, and of the
very Grafs of the Field, and all the moft ob-
vious and inconfiierable productions of Na-
ture, have fo many wonderful difficulties in
the explication of them, that if we were not
mightily inclined to flatter our felves, I am a-
fraid we fliould fooner turn Scepticks, than
be
\6 The Reafonablenefs a?icf Certainty
be able to imagin, that we can give any to-
lerable account of them* For when all is
done, we know juft enough of them to ac-
knowledge and admire the infinite Power and
Wifdom and Goodnefs of God, and to be
led to a ftedfaft belief and aflurance of what
he has revealed of himfelf, and of the World
to come 5 that the invijiblc things of him from
the Creation of the World may be clearly feen?
being underflood by the things that are made?
' even his eternal Power and Godhead? R.OIJ1. I.
20. How little is it, that we know of this
Earth, where we live, and which we dote fo
much upon ? For by the leaft calculation it
is above three thoufand and five hundred
miles to the Center $ but the Art and Curiofi-
ty of Man has never reached, according to
Mr. Boyle's account, after all. his enquiries a-
/fli«5%e-mong Navigators and Miners, (c) above one
ohgyt Sett, mile or two at mofi downward (and that not
4* in above three or four places) cither into the
Earth? or into the Sea : yet all Afironomers agree?
as he afterwards obferves,fte tbeEarth is but a
Phyfical point i?t comparifon of the Starry Heaven ■•
Of how little extent then? fays he, mufl our
knowledge be? which leaves us ignorant offo ma-
ny things touching the vajl bodies? that are above
ttf? and penetrates fo little a way even into the
Earth jbdt is beneath us, that it feems- confined to
but a f mall fiare of the fuperficial part of a Phyfical
Point. And to fhame the pride and vanity of
Mankind, the chief eft discoveries in Philofo-
phyy
2. C. II
of tbeChriftian Religion. 17
phy, as he likewife obferves, hatve been the
productions of Time and Chance, not of any
Wifdotn or Sagacity. Which is a remarkable
acknowledgment in a perfon, who has oblig'd
the world with fo many wonderful Improve-
ments in experimental Philofophy.
The Circulation of the Blood has been but
lately found out, and was looked upon as
abfurd at its firft difcovery 5 tho now what
man can doubt of it ? And fome of the mod:
common effects of Nature might feem as
ftrange as any, if the frequency of them did
not prevent our wonder. If ("as Maimonides M*J™Ne-
puts a cafe) we fuppofe a man of never fo voch . pt
good natural parts, fo brought up as to be
ignorant of the manner how the feveral fpe-
cies of Animals are preferved and propagated
in the world, how many fcruples might he
raife te^himfelf concerning their Conception
and Formation } Might he rot objed, that
it is impoffible, that the Infant mould ever
live, and be nourilhed, and grow in the
Womb > and would he not offer abundance
of Demonftrations to prove, that the Natu-
ral Birth of Mankind, and of all other Crea-
tures, is utterly impofiible ? Our Saviour in
his difcourfe with Nicodemus, anfwers his
Doubts concerning the New Birth,by putting
him in mind that he was as little able to give
an account of the Wind, and that he could
not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth^
implying that there is much lefs reafon to
C doubf
1 8 The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
doubt of things of a Spiritual nature, becaufe
we are able to give no fufficient explication
of them , when we are thus at a lofs about
the mofc common and obvious things in the
world,' jM. 3.8. And S- Paul confutes all
objections againft the Refurrection by a like
Argument,alledging, that as it would be into-
lerably abfurd to deny or doubt of the growth
of Corn, becaufe it cannot perfectly be ex-
plained : f» it is much more abfurd to deny
or doubt of the Kefurreftion for no better
reafon, fince fupernatural things muftbe more
, obfcure and harder to be understood by us
than natural, 1 Cor. 15.36.
Indeed Infidelity could never be more in-
excufable than in the prefent Age, when fo
many difcoveries have been made in Natural
Philofophy, which would have been thought
as incredible to former Ages, as a»y thing
perhaps that can be imagined, which is not
a downright contradiction. That Gravita-
ting or Attractive Force, by which all Bodies
aft one upon another, at never fo great a di-
ftance, even through a Vacuum of prodigious
extent lately demonftrated by Mr Newtof? 5 the
Earth, together with the Planets, and the Sun
and Stsrs being placed atTuch diftances, and
difpos'd of infuch order ^and in fnch a manner,
as to maintain a perpetual ballance and poife
throughout the Univerfe, is fucfi a difcovery,
as nothing' lets than a Demonftration could
have gained it any Belief. And this Syftem
of
of the Chriftian Religion. i£
of Nature being fo lately difcovered, and fo
wonderful,that no account can be given of it
by any Hypothefis in Philofophy, but it muft
be refolved into the fole Power and good
Pleafure of Almighty God, may be a caution
againft all Attempts of eftimating the Divine
Works and Difpenfations by the Meafures of
Humane Reafon. The vaftnefs of the World's
extent is found to be fo prodigious, that it
would exceed the Belief not only of the Vul-
gar, but of the greateft Philofophers, if un-
doubted experiments did not affure us of the
Truth of it. We are allured by men of the
beft art and skill in thofe things, * that eve-^
ry Fixt Star of the firft magnitude is above an %0e°^?cf
hundred times bigger than the whole Glob.^/ high
of the Earth, and yet they appear lefs thro^;^
the Telefcopes, than they do to the naked Us owe* t's
Eye, and look no bigger than meer Specks or God-
Vhyfical joints of Light 3 and theSftn, which
is lbme millions ot miles nearer to us than
the Fixt Stars, is by Mathematicians generally
believed to be above an hundred and threefcore
times bigger than the Earth, and by the ex-
acted: calculations, is eftimated to be eight
or ten thoufand times as big as the whole
Earth,and (as Mr Boyle thinks J may perhaps be
found to be yet much vafter by further obfer-
vations. The Earth is * computed to be above * Huy-
feventeen millions of German miles diftant ?«n ' Con'
A ICit. CO?!-
from the Sun : And a Bullet carried with the t«mi%i iU
fame fwiftnefs that it has when it is (hot orxtV^'fL
„ „ Worlds, lib,
G 2 , of2.
20 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
of a great Gun, fuppofing it moved from the
Earth to the Sun, would fpend twenty five
years in its pailage 3 "to move from J jtpitcr to
the Sun it would require one hundred and
twenty five years -7 and from Saturn thither
two hundred and fifty years : andfuch a Bullet,
by Mr Huygens's computation, would fpend
almoft feven hundred thoufand years in its
pallage between us and the neareft of the
Fixt Stars 5 he fpeaks concerning the nearnefs
of em,and then (lands amaz'd to thmk,what a
prodigiotts number bef/des there mujl be of thofe^
which are placed fo deep in the vajl fpaces of
Heaven, as to be as remote from thefe, as thefe
are from the Sun, For, if with eur bare eye we
can obferve above a thoufand, and with a Telef-
cope can difcover ten or twenty times as many,
what bounds of number, fays he, vtufl we fet to
thofe,which are out of the reach even of thefe AJfijl-
anccs ! efpetially if we conftder the infinite Power
of God. Really whep I have been reflecting
thus with myfelf, methought all our Arithmetic!^
was nothing, and we are vcrfed but in the very
Rudiments of Numbers in comparifon of this
great fu?nm. For this requires an immenfe Trea~
fury not of twenty or thirty Figures only in
Our Decuple Progrejjion , but of as many as there
are grains of Sand upon the fiore. And yet who
can jay, that even this number exceeds that of
the Fixt Stars ?
The Quantity of Motion in the worl^is
no lefs wonderful. For if the Earth move
upon
of the Cbriftian Religion, 2 1
upon its own * Axis, a place fituate under *^ Boy
the ^Equator muft be carried with as fwifta!W'
motion, as a Bullet (hot out of a Cannon -0
and if the Earth (land ftilJ, and the Stars
move" round about it, a Fixt Star in the JE~
quator muft move fifty two thoufand five hun-
dred fifty five miles in a minute of an hour 5
which, if not more, is at leaft three thoufand
times fafter than the motion of a Cannon Bul-
let :and the motion of the Fluid Matter inter-
fperft between the Earth and the Stars muft be
anfwerably rapid. And yet all thefe prodigious
motions are fo exactly proportioned and mo-
derated, that, as that Great Philofopher ob-
ferves, no Watch for a few hours has ever
gone fo regularly, as the whole World has
been moved for fo many Ages. And id the
confederation of innumerable Inftances of the
ftupendous Works of Nature, the ingenuous,
fays he, confefs their Ignorance, &nd the con-
fident betray theirs.
But if any man (hall think thefe Calculati-
ons extravagant, ( as difcoveries in Philofo-
phy are commonly thought by fuch "as are
little converfantin it) let hirn remember, that
they are fet flown according to the bell: ob-
fervations, that the wit of man, after the ex-
perience of fo many Ages, has been able to
make. So that whether thefe* accounts be
tjue or falfe, they fhew the infufficiency of
humane Underftanding to examine the works
of God, and do by confequence fhew how
C 3 much
2 The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
much more 'incapable the wifeft of men are
to comprehend the Infinite effence of the
Creator himfelf.
* Ctmjeff. The famous Mr * Huygens lately mention-
STpS ec^ Speaking of the pailage and communicati-
tar.worids, on of Light every way, and in every point of
ub l- Space through fucn vaft Regions (which muft •
be much more to be admired, if there be fup-
pos'd to be a Vacuum^ in which there can be
nothing to direct or determine its Motion and
regulate its CoqrfeJ has thefe words $ all thefe
things are fo wifely. fo. wonderfully contrivedjhat
it is above the power of humane Jfit^not to invent
or frame fo7newh at like them0 but even to imagin
or comprehend them.
To fay nothing of the ftrange Difcoveries
concerning the Formation and Contexture of
the Bodies both of Plants and Animals ^ the
innumerable little Animals, which are dis-
covered by Microfcopes in but one drop
of water,and many other observations of the
like nature, are fo wonderful, that we might
well fufpecl: the truth of the experiments, if
men of the greateft skill and integrity, as well
in our own, as in other Countreys, did not a-
gree in them. The vaft quantities of water,
which are continually flowing out of fo ma-
ny thoufand Rivers into the Sea keep their
conftant courfe, and are fome way lb diipo-
fed of, as that the Sea and Land retain al-
ways a due proportion to each other. But
the Original of the Fountains from whence
thofe
of the Chriftia?i 'Religion. 23
trtofe Rivers proceed, and how this Circula-
tion of Waters is made, is ftill matter of dif-
pate. The concuflions of Earthquakes reach-
ing .fometimes to fo vaft an extent, and the
prodigious eruptions of Fire from divers burn-
ing Mountains in feveral parts of the Earth,
throwing out abundance of matter in Rivers
of Fire of great breadth for many_«miles toge-
ther, feem incredible to thofe, who have not
read and confidered thefe tilings. The Ver-
ticity of the Loadftone, the Flux and Reflux
of the Sea, Life and Motion, every thing in
Natural Philoibph'y, when ferioufiy exami-
ned, has (o many inexplicable Difficulties, as
would make a confiderate man very modeft
in his Cenfures concerning things fupernacu- *
ral. For if we had been placed in another
World, a Natural Hiftory of this might have
feemed as ftrange to us, as any thing Reveal-
ed can do now. And it muft be great pre-
emption in us, who know fo little of the
World we live in, to talk pragmatically of
another, which we have only been told of ^
and to believe no more than our Sences can
inform us of, when every Sence may inform
us, how narrow and imperfeft our Know-
ledge is, and that we take upon Truft, or
fwallow in the Grofs, what we are common-
ly lead diftruftful about. And not only Na-
ture, but even Art exceeds the Appreheniions
of moft men. The Mechanical Powers .and
Motions are wont to be miftaken for Magick
C 4 by
24. The Reafonablenefs anJCertanity
by fuch as have not skill and experience ft
thofe matters $ the performances of Archi-
medes were fo wonderful beyond all expecta-
tion or belief, that the King ot'Sjracufe is faid
to have made a Decree, to fcrbid any man to
queftion whatever Archimedes mould ailert.
The Force of Gunrpowder might be thought
incredible, tf it were not fo common amongft
us. Not to mention, that the Indians took
0 Watches for Animals , and could not
imagine, how men could hold correfpon-
dence at a diftance by a little piece of Paper.
What man is there among the Vulgar that
can conceive, how the dimenfions and di-
ftances of the Sun and Stars can be taken,
and how the Eclipfes of the Sun and Moon,
and of the Satellites of Jupiter can be calcu-
lated ? And is not the knowledge of the
wifeft man upon earth infinitely more fur-
pafs'd by the Pi vine Wifdom , than his
Knowledge can excel that of the greateft
Idiot ?
•III. Thofe who disbelieve and reject the
Myfteries of Religion, muft believe things
much more incredible. I- He that will not
believe the Being of an Eternal God, muft be-
lieve Matter to be eternal : for it is certain
fomething muft be eternal, becaufe nothing
could produce nothing 5 and unlefs there al-
ways had been fomething, there never could
Iiavcbeen any thing. But this Eternal Mat-
ter fnuft either have been once without Moti-
on, ;
of. the Chriftian Religion. 25
on, or always with it : if it were once with-
out Motion, then Matter muft move itfelf,
that is, Motion muft be -produced without
any thing to produce it. If it were always in
Motion, then there muft have been an eter-
nal Succeffion, fince Motion cannot be all at
once 5. for the very nature of Motion fup-
pofes Progreflion, and no Body can move in
this fpace and the next at the fame inftant :
for then it muft be in two places at once. But
all Succeiiion of Duration is gradual, and the
Degrees of it are capable of being numbred 5
and to fuppofe an Eternal Succeffion is to
fuppofe an Infinite Number 5 that is, a Num-
ber, to which nothing can be added, and
from which nothing can be fubftra&ed 5 or a
Number which is no Number. Motion there-
fore could not be Eternal, and confequent-
ly the World could not exift from Eter-
nity. '
But. fince there muft be fomething Eternal,
there muft be fomething, the duration where-
of is indivifible, or which has all itsexiftence
together, fo as to have exifted now no long-
er, than- it had done before the Beginning of
the World. For this is the notion of Eterni-
ty, that it has neither Beginning nor End :
and therefore things eternal never had a lefs
or fhorter duration, than they now have, and
can never have a longer after millions of Ages,
than they had the firft year, or day, from
whence
26 ihe Reafonablenefs and Certainty
whence we may be iu. )ofed to begin the
computation of chofe Ages* For a longer or
fhorter Duration muft foppofe a Beginning,
from whence the computation is made $ and.
therefore that which is eternal, and had no
Beginning, can have neither a longer nor a
(horter Duration, but always the fame : and
by confequence Time can bear no proportion
to Eternity, becaufe that which had a Begin-
ning can bear no proportion to that which
had none.. Yet Eternity muft ccexift with
Time, in all the differences and fucceilions of
it, and muft be prefeut with every part of it 5
that is, the Eternal Being exifts the fpace,
iuppofe,of a thoufand years, and a Temporal,
or Created Being exifts at the fame time as long,
and the Temporal Being" becomes a thoufand
years older than it was, but the Eternal no
older than it was before 5 becaufe tho it co-
exift with Time, yet it has no refpecl* to the
divifion of it into Paft, Prefent and Future.
There is no Myftcry in Religion more diffi-
cult and perplexing than this j and yet this is
no more than what every one, tho lie be a
Deift, or an Atheift, muft acknowledge to
believe, if he will but confider it.
2. Whoever believes that there is a God,
and yet believes no Revelation, or that the
Scriptures are not by Revelation from him,
muft believe a God, and yet deny the Divine
Attributes $ he muft believe that there is a
God,
of the Chriftian Religion. 27
God *, who is not effentially juvt and good**£>M
and holy, which is in effect to believe no Godya? %#*
at all, as I have proved at large in the for- Mv wi*
merBook. ^iyahit
6TO.f/.\JVCU
toi( JW« Ao07, ^ a.*fitK7av ph diroQwcu ik J^iA&oht t3j> pSo»'oj'!&C.
T* /» *££ hotiriv^H £$v ih 7afythay ^(iivfftlv ; 7n*e?Xpit*t
K^tTWj' r$J Zfa J ynf Toit etKa.Qa.f7oH J'au^otri, &C. *?Va -/T-aif tor
dya.^it-, « perly A^oytiri ^ hiajf <fk ttsZta. «T^V, »/ei<3s «//«t$ M^iW*
Key*. Cyrill.Alex. con:r. Julian, lib. 8»
Much more might be faid upon fo copious
a fubject,'bui: this is enough to make us more
humble and modeft, in judging of the Di-
vine Myfteries. For (hall poor Mortals, who
know fo little, and that little fo imperfectly,
prefume to cenfure the Holy Scriptures, be-
caufe they contain things, which they can-
not underftand I Shall he, that cannot fully
explain the Nature of the vileft Infect, re-
ject what God hath delivered concerning
himfelf, becaufe he doth not comprehend it ?
The thoughts of mortal men are miserable, and
our devices are but uncertain. For the cor-
ruptible Body preffeth down the Soul, and
thi earthly Tabernacle voeigheth down the mind,
that mu feth upon many things. And hardJy do
we guefs aright at things that are upon earth,
and with labour do we find the things that are
before us : but the things that are in heaven, who
hathfearched out .<? Wifd. 19, 14, 15, 16. [QLJS B^_
" But '* out of the contemplation of Na- vmcemmf
f- tore, and out of the Principles of humane iLc*™-
28 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
" Reafon, to difcourfe, or earneftly to urge a
u point touching the myfteries or Faith ^ and
"again to be curioufly ipeculative into thofe
<c fecrets, to ventilate them, and to be inqui-
" fitive into the manner of the myftery, is in
" my judgment not fate : Da fidei, qu£ fidei
"fiint. For the Heathens themfelves con-
" elude as much, in the excellent and divine
" Fable of the Golden . Chain, that Men and
" Gods were not able to draw Jupiter down
" to the Earth ^ but contrarywife Jupiter was
"able to draw them up to Heaven. Where-
" fore he laboureth in vain, who (hill at-*
"tempt to draw down Heavenly myfierics to
" our Reafon ^ it rather becomes us to raife
" and advance our Reafon to the adored
" Throne of Divine Truth.
1 '■
CH A P. II.
Of bifpiration.
A LI the Motion of Material things is de-
rived from God, and the beft account
which thofe who have the mod ftudied the
nature of Motion, have been able to give of
it is only this, that it is an efteft of the Di-
vine Power raanifefting itfelf according to
certain Laws or Rules, which God has been
pleafed to prescribe for the communication of
Motion from one Body to another. And it
js at leaft as conceivable by us, that God doth
ad
of the Chriftian Religion. 29
aft upon the Immaterial, as that he afts upon
the material part of the World, and highly
reafonable to fuppofe, that he concerns him-
felf with our Souls much more than with our
Bodies. There is no doubt to be made, but
that feparate and tmbodied fpirits have ways of
of converfing,or communicating their thoughts
to one another : indeed all the communication
and difcourfe, that is among men in this world,
is properly between their Souls, which ufe their
Bodies as inftruments for the conveyance of
their Thoughts and Notions from one to ano-
and as their Bodies are more or lefs fit and
ferviceable to this end, fb their difcourfe is
more or lefs eafily convey 'd, and therefore
Souls when they are at Liberty from thefe
Bodies muft have a Power to communicate
their own thoughts in a way much more free
and unconfin'd than in this Life 5 as they
have more knowledge in a feparate ftate, fo
they muft have fitter means to communicate it.
And fince the happinefs of Heaven confifts in
the Vifion of God, that is, in the com-
munications of the Divine Wifdom and
Goodnefs , God certainly can as well ad
upon the minds of Men in this mortal ftate,
tho we be lefs capable of receiving or obfer-
ving the influences of his Spirit. Since finite
Spirits can ad one upon another, it is reafo-
nable to believe that the Spirit of God, the
God of the Spirits of all flcflj doth move and
work upon the Spirits of. Men, that he en-
lightens
3<5 The Re a/one blenefs and Certainty
lightens their underftandings, and inclines
their Wills by a fecret Power and Influence in
the methods of his ordinary Grace. And he
can likewife aft upon the Wills and the under-
ftandings of fome men with a fearer and more'
powerful Light and Force, than he is pleafed
to do upon others, in fuch a manner as to
render them infallible in receiving and deli-
vering his Pleafure and Commandments to
the World. He can fo reveal himfelf to
them, by the Operations of his Holy Spirit,
as that they (hall be infallibly aflur'd of what
is revealed to them, and as infallibly allure o-
thers of it. Which kind of Revelation is
ftyl'd Infpiration, becaufe God doth not only
move and actuate the minds of fuch men 5
but vouchfafes to em the extraordinaryCom-
munications of his Spirit 5 the Spirit then
more efpeCially may be liken d to the Winds,
to which it is compared in Scripture : for by
ftrong convictions and forcible, but gracious
Imprefiious he breaths upon their Souls ,
and infufes 'his Divine Truths into them.
But upon thofe, to whom God did thus re-
veal himfelf by inward light and know-
ledge, he did moreover beftow a power of
giving external evidence by miraculous works,
that their pretences were real, and that what
they fpoke was not of them, but was reveal'd
to them from God. This infpiration the A-
poftles profeft to have both in their Preach-
ing and^Writings, and this evidence they
gave of if. ki
of the Chriftian Religion. g I
In fpeaking of the Infpiration, by 'which
the Scriptures were written, I. I (ball (hew
wherein the Infpiration of the Writers of the
Scriptures didconfift, or how far it extended.
II. I (hall from thence make fuch inferences,
as may afford a fufficient anfwer to the ob-
jections alledgec} upon this fubjeft.
I. I (hall (hew wherein the Infpiration of
the Writers of the Scriptures did confift, or
how far it extended. And here we mull: con-
fider both the Matter and the Words ot Scrip-
ture. The Matter is either concerning things
reveal'd, and which could not be known but
by Revelation, or it is fomething which was
the object of Senfe and Matter of Fad, as
when the Apoftles teftify, that our Saviour
was crucify 'd and rofe again ^ or laftly,. it is
matter of Reafon, as difcourfes upon Moral
fubjefrs, and inferences made from things re-
veal'd, or from matter of Fact. God, who
is a Spirit, can fpeak as intelligibly to the
fpirits and minds of Men, as Men can fpeak
to trje ear, and in things which could not be-
knov/n but by Revelation, the notions were
fuggefted and infufed into the minds of the * prjEterea
Apoftles and Prophets by. the Holy Ghoft, fcito, u»
but they might be left to put them into their n"^
ow ,ti * Words, being fo directed in the ufe of propiie-
ram peca-
n'are quid habere, & ea lingua, esq; loquendi rarione, qux ipfi eft famili-
aris & confuera,ipfum impelli &Prophetia fua ad loquendum ei,qui intel-"
ligit ipfuni. Maimon. More Nevoch. Part 2. c. B9.
them,
32 The Reafonab/enefs and Certainty
them, as to give infallibly the fenfe and full
importance of the Revelation. In matters of
Fafr, their Memories were according to our
Saviours promife affifted and confirm'd. In
matters of Difcourfe or Reafoning, either from-
their own natural Notions, or from things
Reveal'd, or from matters ot Faft, their un-
derftandings were enlightned,'and their Judg-
ments ftrengthned. And ftill in all cafes their
natural Faculties were fo fupported and guided
both in their Notions and Words, as that no-
thing mould come 'into their Writings, but
what is infallibly true. They had always* the
ufe of their Faculties, tho under the infallible
Direction and Conduct of the Holy Ghoft,
and in things that were the proper obje&s or.
their faculties , the Holy Ghoft might only
fupport and guide them, as in matters of fenfe
and natural Reafon and Memory, and in their
Words and Style to exprefs all thefe. But in
things of an higher Nature, which were
above their faculties, and which they could
have no knowledge of, but from Revelation,
the things themfelves were infuled, tho the
words in moft cafes might be their own, but
they were preferv'd from error in the u(e of
them by that Spirit, who was to guide them
rrito all Truth.
For tho the feveral Writers of the Scrip-
tures might he allowed to ufe their own
Words and Style, yet it was under the infal-
lible guidance and influence of the Spirit, as
when
tf the Chrijlian Religion. gj
When a man is left to the ufe of his own
Hand, or manner of Writing, but is di reded
in the Senfe and Orthography by one who
dictates to him, or affifts him with his help,
where it is needfuh Prophecy came not in old.
time by the will of man : but holy men of God
fpake, as they were moved by the Holy Ghojl t
2 Pet. I. 21. All Scripture is given by Injpi-
ration of God: a Tim. 3. 16. The Holy
Gho(l faith, by the Pfalmift, to day if ye will
hear his Voice, Hebr. 3. 7. David faith of
himfelf, the Spirit of the Lord fpake by me, and
his word was in my Tongue, 2 Sam. 23. 2. And
God is faid to fpeak by thethand ofMofes his
fervant, and by the hand of his fervant Ahijah
the Prophet, 1 Kings 8. 53. 14. 18. By which
it appears, that he uled the Prophets as his
Inftruments in revealing his Will : For as Mi-
racles were by the immediate power or God,
though wrought by the hands of men, fo the
Revelations were of God, though fpoken or
written by the 'Prophets and Apoftles, But
though God ufed them as his Inftruments,
yet not as mechanical, but as rational Inftru*
ments^ and as in working their Miracles, they
were not always neceifarily determined to the
place, or to the perfons on whom they were
wrought, but in general were guided to work
them, when they were proper and feafonable 5
and the A&ions, by which they wrought
them, were their, own, though the power
D ' th&i
TJoe Reafonableriefs and Certainty
that accompanied them was of God ^ fo in
their Do&rines , they might be permitted to
life their own Words and Phrafes, and to be
guided by prudential Motives, as to time,
and place, and perfons, with a dire&ive pow-
er only over them, to fpeak and write no-
thing but infallible truth, upon fuch occalt-
ons, and in fuch circumftances, as might an-
1 wer the end of their Million , with which
they were eutrufted.
Cod.promifed Mofes, when he fent him
to Pharaoh, that he would be with his mouthy
and with Aaron's mouth, and would teaohthem
what they JJjould fay, Exod,. 4. 12, 15. And
our Saviour tells Tiis Difciples,. ye Jhatf be
brought before Governours a?jd Kings for my
fake, for a tefimony againft them and the Gen'
tiles0: But when they deliver you up, take no
thought, how or what ye fiall fpeak, fir it fljall
be given you in that fame hour what ye f/jall fpeak,
Matt. to. 18, 19. And if Mofes was infpi-
red upon that particular occafion, and the A-
poftles were infpired in things which were
perfonal, as in the defence that they made for
themfelves, they muft much rather be infpired
in their Writings, which concern the Church
in all ages. St Luke had perfeft underfianding
of all things from above, Luke 1.3. foDr
Lightfoot renders it with great probability ;
for thus av»Uv is ufed for J^ofli? in many
places of Scripture, Job. 3, 3,31* 19. 2.
Jam* 1. 17. 3.17. And this the Church of
Co-
of the Cbriflian Religion, 3§
Corinth expe&ed from St Paul, they fought a
proof of Chrift fpeaking in him, 2 Cor, 13.3.35
that Apoftle tells them he did, and that not
in a weak and obfcure, but in a powerful
and effectual manner. He writes for the fame
reafon to the TheJfalonians,j/e know what com-
mandments we gave you by the Lord Jefus,
r%i Theff! 4. 2. and he diftinguifheth between
his own judgment (affifted and enlightened,
though not infallibly, by the Holy Ghoft)
and the Commandments of the Lord, or the
infallible dictates of the Spirit, 1 Cor 7. io,
12, 25, 46. The Holy Ghoft taught the Apo-
ftles all things, and brought all things to their
remembrance, Jo. 14. 26. and guided them into
all Truth, Joh. 16.13. and theUnUion from the
holy one inftru&ed em to know all things, ijoh.
11. 20. that is,all things pertaining to Salvati-
on 5 this is faid of their Difciples, and there-
fore may in a more efpecial manner be affirm-
ed of the Apoftles themfelves 5 infomueh that
the words themfelves are afcribed to the Holy
Ghoft, which things alfo we fpeak not in the
words which mans wifdom teacheth, but which
the Holy Ghoft teacheth, comparing fpiritual
things w$th fpiritual, 1 i Cor. 2. 1 3 . For they
! were under the conduct and influence of the
'••Holy Ghoft in the choice of every word they
ufed, tho not fo, as to be infpired with a
new ftyle and dialed 5 the words themfelves
were not always fuggefted, but they were al-
ways infpired in the ufe of them 3 and tho
D 2 thev
3 6 The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
they might be permitted to chufe their own
words and expreilions, yet it was with this
limitation, that they were never permitted to
make choice- of fuch, as would not fully
and infallibly exprefs the mind of- the Koly
Ghoft.
And therefore i Cor. 14. 13. the Apoftle
gives this direction, Wherefore let him that,*
Jpeafeth in an unknown tongue, fray that he may
interpret-^ that is, let him pray, that he may
have the Divine Infpiration to ailift him in
expreffing himfelf in a known tongue, by
which he is enabled to fpeak in an unknown
one, and that he may be infallible in ren-
drifig that in his own tongue, which he in-
fallibly (peaks in another. Which makes it
• evident, that when they fpoke, by Infpiration
in their own language, they had the Guidance
and Inl pi ration of the Hoi J Ghoft in the ufe
of their words 5 and this was the reafon why
thofe that fpoke by Infpiration in a ftrange
tongue, durft nor prefume to interpret the
words, which the Holy Ghoft dictated to
them in that tongue, fo as to give them out
for Divine Revelation, nnlefs they were par-
ticularly empowered to render themrin their
own lansmao-e with the fame exafrnefs, with .
which they were infpiredto fpeak inaltrange•,
tongue. For that the necetiity of praying
that they might interpret, could not proceed
from any inability to interpret by reafon of,
the force and heat of the Rapture which was
upon
of the Chrifliafi Religion*
upon 'em, that made em unable to utter their
concepiions in their own language, or to re-
tain the fenfe of them in their minds after-
wards, feems plain from ver(e 27. if any man
fpeak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or
at the moil by three, and that by courfe, and let
one interpret^ &c. For if they had been acl>
ed by fuch rapturous heats and extafies, they
could have been as little able to refrain, when
the Rapture was upon them, and to remem-
ber what they had to deliver, when their
courfe came to fpeak, as they are fuppofed to
have been to remember what they were in-
fpired to fpeak in one language, when they
went to exprefs it in another. Neither were
they ignorant themfelves of what they fpoke,
but when it is faid verf 14. for if I pray in an
unknown tongue my fpirit prayeth, but myunder-
fianding is unfruitful 5 the meaning of that is,
that it was of no benefit to others, tho he that
fpeaketh in an unknown tongue edify eth himfelf
verf. 4. Some men were infpired to fpeak in
ftrange tongues with as much readinefs, and
more exactnefs than they could do in their
native language -0 but this was infignificant to
fuch as underftood not the tongue in which
they fpoke. . What is it then ? I will pray with
the fpirit, and I will pray with the under (land-
ing alfo, verf. 15. i.e. I will pray by t],ie
Guidance and Infpiration of the Holy Ghofl,
but in my own language, in which my un-
derftanding is employed, and the words are
D 3 not
n
The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
not all dire&ly fuggefted to me by the Spirit
fas they muft be in a language which I fpeak
meerly by Infpiration ) but I am only fo far
guided and aitifted in the choice and ufe of my
words, as to fpeak infallibly the mind of the
fpirit.£//e when thou fialt blefs with the fpirit&C,
wife 16. Thofe who had the gift of tongues
were, it feems, fo puflft up with, it, that they
would worfhip God in no other bat in thofe
languages, tho none of the AfTembly under-
ftood them,and would be always unneceflarily
and unfeafonably repeating the Revelations,
which they had received in (Irange languages 5
the Apoftle tells fuch men that it was very im-
proper and abfurd to deliver their Revelations
in an unknown Tongue, or to pray or give
, thanks^in a Language not underftood by thofe
! that heard them,but that they fhould pray that
! £hey might interpret, or forbear the ufe of the
i gift of toiigueSjUnlefs before them who under-
stood the Tongues in which they fpoke. that
i it might be for edification. For in their In-
spirations they were confined at certain times
; to fome particular Language, as the Spirit gave
them utterance ^ and it might have done great
prejudice to the Truth of Religion, if they
of themfelves had ventured to render that in-
to their own Language, which was revealed
to them in a ftrange Tdngue : and for this
reafon it was not permitted thofe, who (poke
with Tongues, to fpeak in any but that, in
"which the Revelation was made to them, unlefs
of the Chriftian Religion. 3^
they were enabled to do it by being infpired
with a Power of Interpretation. For to J peak,
with tongues and to interpret were diftindt gifts,
1 Cor. 12. 10, 30. and whatever gift any one
had received, he was confined to the exercife
of it, and might not prefume to pretend to a-
nother, which he had not received.
The gift of tongues, and of the interpreta-
tion of tongues, being fo particularly diftin-
guifhed, this muft imply, that the Apoftles
(who are fuppofed to have had all the gifts,
which others had but in part) were guided by
the Spirit in their words and expremons, (ince
thofe who fpoke by the Spirit, were unable
to interpret without a particular gift 5 for no
interpretation was diffident, but fuch as ren-
dred the fenfe with infallible truth and exadV
nefs $ and if this exa&nefs of words was re^
quifite in their AiTemblies, it muft be much -
rather neceffary in the writings of the Apoftles
and Evangel ifts. Among other gifts of the
Holy Ghoft, are reckon 'd the word of wifdom,
and the word of knowledge, 1 Cor. 1 2. 8. the
former Qrotius underftands of fpeaking
wife fayings, and the latter of knowledge in
Hiftory$ and to the reft was added the gift
of difcerning of fpirits, v. 10. And as there
were feveral gifts, fo there were feveral of-
fices in the Church, Ephef.^. n, 12. Now the
feveral gifts of the Holy Ghoft were not all
beftowed ordinarily upon the fame perfon,but
fuch as were neceffary for that office and em-
D 4 ployment
^Q The Reafojiablemfs and Certainty
ployment which he was to execute . But as
the Apoftolical Power comprehended in it the
powers of every other office, fo it was requi-
site that they fhould poflefs the gifts proper
for the performance of whatever was to be
done by them. And when God, by his provi-
dence and difpofal of things, gave the Apoftles
and Evangelifts occafions of writing upon
fbchand fuch fubje&s, and to fuch and iiich
perfons, or Churches , he by his Spirit inward-
ly excited and affifted them in it, beftowing
upon them the gifts of Wifdom and Know-
ledge, and of writing and fpeaking either in
their own or any other Language, in which
they were required to write or fpeak : For we
are not to fuppofe that-any gifts were beftow-
ved upon others, and yet denied to them, to
whom they were mod ufeful and necefiary, in
order to the delivering of that Faith and
Doctrine, wThich was to be the (landing rule
for the attainment of Salvation to all. Christi-
ans unto the end of the world. When others
had the gift of. fpeaking. and interpreting
ftrange Languages, it cannot be conceived
that the writers of the Holy Scriptures Qiould
be refufed that necefiary afliftarice in the Lan-
guages in which they vyrote, that might pre-
serve them from error 5 and if any, without
the gifts proper for it, had undertaken any
office or miniftration, the gift of difceming
of Spirits was a fccurity to the Church from
any hurt that might enfue by the pretences of
fuch undertakers. We
of the Cbrijiian Religio?i, 41
We may be certain, that all the Gifts,
which were beftowed for the edification of
the Church, were (as far as they were need-
ful J vouchsafed more especially to all fuch, as
were to leave behind them for the benefit of
the Church in all Ages, .an account of the
Gofpel of Chrift, and the terms of the Salva-
tion to be obtained thereby 5 and that no fuch
Guidance and Direction of the Holy Ghoft
was wanting as might prefer ve them from er-
ror in any particular: for there is no particular,
but it will fall under fome one of thofe gifts,
which were beftowed upon the firft Difciples.
They were not neceffarily to write in an ex-
act and elegant ftyle, but in fuch as was fe-
cored from error in whatever they delivered.
To what purpofe elfe had been fo many feveral
Gifts ? To keep them from grofs errors and
fundamental miltakes there could have been no
need of fuch a variety ofGifts : but when every
fort of error, which men are prone to, had a
Remedy provided to prevent it, we may be af-
fured-that no error was fufTered in thofe Wri-
tings, which were the mod: important work
of the Apoftolical Function, and defignedjw-
jhe edifying of the Body of Chrifl not in one
Age and Nation ' only, .but throughout all
Ages,and in all parts of the World.
II.. I (hall now proceed to make fuch Infe-
rences, as may afford a fufficient Anfwer to
the objections alledged upon this fubjecr.
1. The
4* The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
I. The Infpiration of the Writers of the
Scriptures did not exclude humane means,
fuch as information in matters of fad, either
by their own fenfes, or by the teftimony of
others ^ or reafoning from their >own noti-
ons and obfervations : but the Holy Ghoft
guided them infallibly in the ufe of all fuch
means.
\- 2. The Infpiration of the Prophets and
Apoftles or Evangelifts did not exclude the
ufe of their own words and ftyle : and as they
might be permitted the ufe of thefe, fo they
might be permitted, or in fome cafes directed
to ufe the words of others. Many things de*
livered in one Book of the Scriptures are like-
wife delivered in another, and fome things
are repeated in t^ie fame words, that God re-
vealing the fame things, and in the fame ex-
prefs words, at different times, and by diffe-
rent perfons, might make the Revelation of
them the more evident and remarkable. For
that, in which feveral infpired perfons con-
cur, is the more taken notice of, and becomes
the more obferved, as a thing of great waght
and moment. The reafon why the Dream was
doubled wit a Pharaoh twice , was becaufe th$,
thing was ejlablified.by God, and God would
jhortly bring it to pafs, Gen 41 • 32. It is in this
as it is in all other things, it is expedient, that
in matters of great concernment, there .mould
be the more folemnity, and that they mould
be the oftner repeated and the more, infifted
upon $
of the Cbriftfan Religion. 45
jupon 5 and if they be expreft in the fame
words, this implies, that thofe words carry-
more than ordinary weight in them ; And
therefore not only all the Divine Writers a-
gree in the fame purpofe and defign, and tefti-
tie the fame things, as to the chief points of
"Religion 5 but fome Prophets have foretold
the fame things, even in the * fame words
with others, as Ifai: 2. 2, 3, 4. Mic. 4. 1,
2, 3. and feveral Laws and Matters of Fact
are repeated in words, which are very near
the fame.
3. Tho fome things are fet down in the
Scriptures indefinitely, and without any pofi-
tive afTertion or determination, this is no proof
againft their being written by Divine Infpira-
tion. For this doth not prove, that the Pen-
men of thofe paffages were uncertain . and
doubtful in the particulars fo expreft, becaufe
the things were of that nature, that it was
needlefs to fpeak precifely of them : As. when
St John fays, Jo. 21. 8. They were not far from
Land, but as it were two hundred Cubits, it can-
not from hence be concluded that the Eyan-
gelift was ignorant how far they were from
JLand : For it was not material to his defign
to be more particular in a circumftance of that
nature 5 but it was fufficient to fay, that they
were about two hundred Cubits off at Sea *
and it is ufual with all Writers to omit fracti-
ons, and infert only whole numbers, when it
is not material to their purpofe to infift upon
* every
44 The Reafontblenefs and Certainty
every minute circumftance. It is ordinary
with the beft Writers to exprefs things uncer-
tainly , which "they were notwithftaning
throughly acquainted withal, and to feem ig-
norant of things, which they perfectly under-
flood, but paft over as not worth the taking
notice of, or not considerable enough for them
to own the knowledge of them. It is a known
Elegancy to fay, nefcio quid, or nefcie quem,
v/hen the Author fo fpeaking was not igno-
rant of the thing or perfon there meant, but
either fignified his contempt of the perfon or
thing, or intimated that it was not worth
his while to trouble himfelf, or his
Hearers or Readers with a more particular re-
* Credo iatjori. The * Remans, ■ out of that Awe and
demindu- Reverence which they had for Oaths, never
tiomarum fpoke pofitively in giving evidence of things
nVti'mu- which they were certain of, and had feen
ifleautco-themfelves. And uncertain forms of Speech
Smpri- are obferved f by Ulpian to have been ufua*l
mum ii- thy Ancient Kjrcck. Authors in their fpeaking
ludver- Gf things, whereof they were very well afTu-
bum con- ,' , i i r J r "*
fideradfTi- red. It could be or no-u.fe or moment in re^
mum
noilrxconfuetudinis drbitror, qao nos eriam tunc utimur, cum ea di-
cimus jurati, qu£ comperta habemus, qwae ipfi vidimus, ex roro tefti-
monio fuo luftuJit, atq; omnia l'e fcire dixit. Cic. pro M . Fonteio.
Xj TO, TOltuTO.^ H -xivirH 6*1 tfup//3p\K ' TAT)***.?' C( •WO.Kett^l , ttf-K*
rroKteiif it, &n & a\nht'w. Uip. in Demo(t. Olynth. i.
Jation
of the Chriftian Religion. 45
lation to the miraculous draught of Fifties, to
knovy whether the Ship were two hundred
cubits, or half a cubit, or a quarter of a cu-
bit over or under from the Land, and it is
ufual with St John to exprefs himfelf in this
manner, Jo. 2. 6. 6." 10. 19.14.
Either then (to keep to the fame inftance)
St John might know the precife diftance, and
for the reafons mentioned, not declare it, or,
it not being of any ufe or confequence for ns
to be more particularly informed in a matter
of that nature, the Holy Ghoft might fuffer
him to be ignorant of it, if he had no other
means of knowing it but by Infpiration : For
the Holy Ghoft aififted the Apoftles and Evan-
gelifts to write infallible Truth, but not al-
ways to write every little circumftance con-
cerning the things which they relate. Many
Miracles' are wholly omitted, and many cir-
cumftances not coniiderable or material to be
mentioned, are omitted, of thofe Miracles
which are recorded. But if nothing be related
which may lead us into error, and nothing
omitted which is neceflary to be known, this
is fufficient, and is all that can be expected in a
Book, which is to be a Rule of Faith and
Manners to us. It is neceflary that nothing
but Truth (liould be contained in it, %but not
that every Truth mould be in it : for then the
world it f elf could not contaip the Books that
jhonld be written. Suppofe therefore that
St John did not know precifely how many cu-
bits
&fi The Reafo?tablenefs and Certainty
bits the Ship was from more 5 what doth this
prove } That he did not know the Miracle
which he there relates ? Doth it prove that
he was not infpired in what he doth relate, if
he were not infpired in what he omits ? If he
had determined the precife diftance, and had
not known it, this might have diferedited the
Authority of his Gofpel, but when he has not
determined it, can this be an argument in di-
minution of its Authority, if he did not know
what he did -aot profe fs to know ? Is it not a
good Argument in confirmation of its Autho-
rity, that he would affert nothing but what
he certainly knew, if in what he was not per-
fectly allured, he mentions no further than he
knew of it > So St Paul acquaints us, when he
fpoke himfelf, and not the Lord, which is an
argument to us, that in all other cafes he did
not fpeak of himfelf, but the Lord fpoke by
him : it is a confirmation of his Integrity, that
he would impofe nothing upon us as of Di-
vine Authority, which is not really fo, be-
en ufe he that told us in any one cafe, that he
(poke of himfelf, not as from the Lord, would
have made the fame Declaration in other
cafes, whenever he had written any thing,
without exprefs Revelation.
4. Iu things, which might fall under hu-
man Prudence and Obfervation, there the
Spirit of God feems not to have dictated im-
mediately to the Prophets and Apoftles, but
only to have/ufed a dire&ive or conducting
Power
cj the Chrifiian Religion. 47
Power and Influence, fo as to fifpply fuch
Thoughts and Apprehenfions to them as might
be moft proper and feafonabk, and to keep
them in the ufe of their own Reafon, within
the bounds of Infallible Truth, and of Expe-
diency for the prefent cafe and occafion. They
might be permitted to infert fuch things as the
ftate of affairs required 3 which tho not imme-
diately dictated by the Holy Ghoft, yet were
agreeable to the end and defign of his Infpi-
ration, and ferviceable to the Miniftry, to
which they were appointtd. There feems to
be no neceility to aflert, that St Paul fen t for
his Cloak and Parchments by Infpiration of
the Holy Ghoft, or that he had any immedi-
ate command or direction to falute the parti-
cular perfons named at the end of his Epi-
ftles 5 but only that his Dofrrine was immedi-
ately infpired by the Holy Ghoft : and as he
might be permitted to put that into his own
words, but fo as never to be fufteredto ex-
prefs it otherwife than in fuch a manner, as
was fully agreeable to the mind and intention
of the Holy Spirit, and therefore infallibly
true :.So in thefe lefferand indifferent matters,
which fome prefent occafion made requifiteto
be written of, he had the guidance and aflift-
ance of the Holy Ghoft to prevent him from
writing any thing, but what was expedient
in thofe circumftances, and ferviceable to his
calling and miniftry in the propagation of the
CofpeL
But
4?» The Reafonabk?iefs and Certainty
But things of an indifferent nature in them-
felves might become neceffary as to time and ■
place, and perfons, and therefore might in
fome cafes be of Divine Infpiration. St Paul's
journeying into Macedonia rather than into
any other Country, was in itfelf a thing in-
different, but the falvation of many fouls
might depend upon it, and therefore he was
warned by Revelation not to preach the word in
A/iay nor to go into Bithjnia, but into Macedo-
nia, Acts 16. 6, 7, 9. In like manner the Sa-
lutations of particular perfons at the end of his
Epiftles, tho they may feem to us to be of no-
great importance, yet might be of mighty
consideration and confequence to thofe who
were concerned in them. To be falufed by
an Apoftle in ^o particular and folemn a man-
ner, might revive their fpirits, and encourage
them to perfeverance under their Temptations
and Afflictions : for his Salutations include his
Benediction, which was the exercife of his
Apoftolick Office and Authority in one great
branch of it. And' God himfelf might direct
the Apoftle to falute fuch perfons for their
fupport and comfort, and encouragement in
the Faith. Befides, the Salutation added at
the end' of the Epiftles are a confirmation of
the Authority of them : the perfons there
mentioned were as fo many Witnefies, ' to at-
teft that they were genuine. For, befides the
general concernment of the Catholick Church,
and of the feveral Churches more efpecially,
to
of the Chriflidn Religion. 4$
to which fuch Epift'les were written, the per-
form wjio were fatuted by name in them, were
more particularly concerned to take cognizance
of them, and to know all the circumftances
relating .to them.
. And St Paul's advice to Timothy to drink nd
longer Water ; but to ufe a- little Wine for his jio-
mactis fake, and his often infirmities, I Tim. v.
23. was requisite to be given in that Epiftle,
I that it might refrain recorded* in the Scriptures,
in confutation x)f that Yuperftition , which
fome were guilty of in abftaining from things
lawful, (and particularly from Wine) out of
an opinion of'Holinefs in refraining front
them, and of fin in the ufe of them.
5. That infallible Spirit which aflifted and
infpired the Apoftles and other Sacred Wri-
ters, was not permanent and habitual, or
continually redding in them , nor given for
all purpofes and occaftons -0 as we may ob-
ferve in St JW,. who acquaints us in fome
things -that he had not received of the Lord
what he writes. But" the gifts of the Spirit,
were beftowed for the benefit and edification
of the Church 5 and therefore were given in
fucli meafures,.at fuch jimes, and upon fuch
occafions, as might be ufeful for edification:
We find that in a matter of great concern-
ment and importance, to the whole Church, ,
the Apoftles met together inCouncel , to de-
cide the Controverfy -0 both, becaufe according
to our Saviours promife to them, they might
E expert
50 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
expe& a more abundant effufion of the Holy
Ghoft upon them, when they were aflembled
in his name for that purpofe ^ and becaufe
the thing in debate depended upo,n Matter of
Fad. z-iz. that the Holy Ghoft was givcm to
the* Gentiles, and therefore "it was reauifite
that many mould meet together, and- teftifie
of that matter. Befides, feveral that came
down from Judea to Antioch had refufed to
fubmit to the Authority of St Paul and St Bar-
nabas, and it was neceflary^hat thefe .men I
mould be convinced by the unanimous and
joint Authority of the Apoftles, who being
met in a full Councel declared,* It feemed good
to the Holy Ghoft and to us, A&S 1^28. that is,
not only to us, but to the Holy Ghoft, to the
Holy Ghoft as well as to us. And this was
for an Example and Precedent to the Church
in future Ages, to determine Controverfies by
the Authority of Councels.
6. The Gifts of the Holy Ghoft were be-
ftowed upon men, who might have perfonal
failings, and were nzen of like Pajjions with us,
*Acl:. 1 4.2 5. They had this Treafure in earthen Vcf-
fels, that the excellency of the Power might be of
God, and not of them f elves, 2 Cor. 4. 7. But they
wercchofen to be Apoftles and Evangelifts,and
therefore muft be fo far exempt from error in
the execution ct 'their Office and Miniftry, as
net to deliver falfe Doctrines in their Wri-
tings, which wc;e to be read and received of
aM Churches in all Ages of the World $ for
this
of the Chrifiian Religion. 5 1
this would have defeated and fubverted the
defign of the Inftitution o,f the Apoftles, and
of the Mi (lion of the Holy Ghoft, and there-
fore this God would not fuffer, tho they might
be fuffered to incur fuch failings .as were no
prejudice to .the Gofpel of Chrift.
7. There being nothing alTerted in %the Ca-
non of Scripture but what has fome relation
to the edification of the Church, ' tho fome
parts of it have a lefs diredr. and apparent ten-
dency "to this *£nd than others 5 if any one
paifage of circumftarrce mould have been er-
roneous , this would diminifti the Authority
of the Scriptures, and make them in fome de-
gree lefs capable to. promote- the end for
which they were written. And there being
fo many particular Gifts, the Gift 0/ Wifdom
and 'of 'Knowledge 5 of Tongues, and of Inter-
pretation of Tongues, and of difcerning of Spi-
rits : and fo many diftinft Offices, as Apoftles,
and Prophets, and Evangeli/ls, and Paftors,
and Teachers, we cannot conceive how thofe
Gifts and thefe Offices could be better em-
ployed than in preferving that Book from er-
ror, which was to be the ftandard of Truth
for aH Ages • or how, if that Book had -not
been fecurtd from error by them, thefe Gifts
and Offices had anfwered the end of their
appointment. * '
Thus much may fuffice to prove the Scri-
ptures to be infallible in all the parts and cir*
cumftances of them. But it may be obferved,
E 2 that
Ihe Reafonabknefs arid Certainty
that if the Infallibility of the Sacred Writers
had not extended t£> the words and circum-
ftances, but only to the fubftantial and funda-
mental points of Religion, this of itfelf were
enough to vindicate the Divine Authority of
the Chriftian Religion. Nay further, if the
Scriptures were written only with the fame
certainty and integrity that is mThucydides,
or in any other credible Hiftorian (which the
moft obftinate and inveterate Adverfary can
never deny ) yet even then no, man without
much unreafonablenefs cou'd .reject it.
4 CHAP. III.
Of the Style of the Holy Scriptures.
Hen God reveals himfelf to men , he
w
muft be fuppofed to dp it in fuch a
manner,as is fuitable to the neceflities and occa-
fions of thofe to whom the Revelation is made,
and in fuch Language and Forms of Speech, as
that he may be underftood by thofe to whom
he reveals himfelf 5 he may be iuppos'd to
fpeak in the Idiom, and in the Metaphors and
Phrafes in ufe amongft them, and u6 allude to
their cuftoms and manner of life , to have
regard to the condition and*ftate of their af-
fairs,'and 'to condefcend in fome meafure to
their weakneftes, to fpeak to their capacities,
fo as to be underftood in his Laws, and to
encourage and excite men to obey them. For
# • tho
of the Cbriftian Religion. 5 3
tlio the particular reafbn and defign of every
Law be not always neceflary to be known,
yet it is neceflary that thofe to whom they
are given, mould know what the Laws are,
and that they mould have their Duty prefcri-
bed in fuch a way, as may be effectual to re-
commend the Pra&ice of it to them.
The ftyle of the Holy Scriptures is a fub-
jeft which has been largely difcourfed of by
Mr Boyle ant others. What I intend to fay
upon it I (hall reduce to thefe Heads.' I. The
Grammatical conftru&ion. II. The Meta-
I phors, and Figures, and Rhetorical Schemes of
Speech. III. The Decorum, or fuitablenefs
of the Matter, or the Things themfelves.
IV. The Method.
I. The Grammatical conftru&ion and pro-
priety of Speaking. ' It has been by many ob-
ferved, that there is a great refernblance be-
tween the ftyle of the Old Teftament, and
that of Homer , the moft ancient Book we have
befides ^ and it . is 1 jkewife obfervable, that
thofe things which are by fome looked [upon
as defects in the Scripture ftyle, as the ufing
one Gender, or one Number, or Cafe or Tenfe
for another, the putting Participles for Verbs,
the Comparative or Superlative for the Pofi-
tive,A£tives for Paflives,or Paffives forAclives, *
are particularly taken notice of by * Plutarch as* l« v»c
excellencies in Horner-^ and he fays, they wereHomer'
ufual in Profe as well as in Verfc amongft the
Antients, Whatfpever Solcecifms or impro-
ve 3 prieties
54 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
prieties of Speech are torbe found in any part
i)Ynd °^ f^e Scriptures, the like have been obferved
Heinf. f in Homer, Mfchylus, Sophocles, Pindar and
Proieg. ^ Apollonins Rhoduu,- by their feveral Scholiafts,
S3Cr> ' and in Thucydides by Diony'flus Halicamajfats,
* Dialog. and in Tul/y by * Erafmus and others. Xeno-
t ApuS* ?^ is 'obferved by f Hellad'ms, not to "be al-
Phor. cod. ways exadt in point of Grammar ^ which
cclxxix. |ie afcribes to his Military Life, and his con-
verfation. with ftrangers. Many Soloecifms are
found in the ancient Infcriptions, and in Hy-
gtnus, an Author, as it is generally fuppofed
of Augufiuss age, which are to be imputed
rather to the cuftom of fpeech amongft the
Vulgar, than to the miftake of thefe Authors.
For in Languages fo difficult as the Greek and
Latin are, it was impoffible but that the com-
mon people muft often make great mi (takes,
which by degrees became cuftomary, and
sTff i were ^ie cnara&er of the ^ Low and Plebeian
?xxht.& Style : and in the Greek tongue they afcribed
Munkeri tne]r So!ce:ifms to the particular Dialeff of
i^Hygi- tne PeoP^e5 among whom they were moft in
num. ule.
The St6icks, who were the moft numerous
and flourishing Sect of Philofophers in the
Primitive times of Chriftianiry, had little re-
gard to the Rules of Grammar : for they were
cautioned by their Mafter Chryfippus not to.be
t Mer. careful about fuch niceties : and they are
Cafaub. in highly commended by a f great Critick for
JJ- ^^cxpreffing their thoughts, thp commonly with
i!n. x\\ words
of the Chriftian Religion. 5 5
words very proper and fignificant, yet in a ftyle
fo free from all Affectation or Curiofity, as
come^h next to the Simplicity of the 'Holy
Scriptures.
The defign of Revelation is not to teach
Words but Things, and to exprefs them in
fuch words as may ferve for that purpofe 5
and if an improper word or a foloecifm may
be more ferviceable to that end, it is beyond
all exafrnefs and propriety of Language. The
truth is, it is a fign of a little Genius -to be
over-curious about words, as Demoftbenes in-
timated in his Reply to Mfthines, telling him •
that the Fortunes of Greece did nQt depend up-
on a Criticifm ^ which Tully mentioning, (ays,
it is * an eafie matter to pitch
upon /word fpokenin the heat ^^^7£Z
OI dllCOUrfe, and in COOl blood notare, idq;, reftinftis jam
iomakefport with it.' But this "im°rum 'M*iMs,midcn.
, r \ n 1 r . C-ic. Orator.
IS at large treated Of by Longl- f.Cujufcunq; oratiqnem
nm^ and Seneca fpeaks excel- J^deris foiiidtarn & politam,
I^tlw*^*U'„ ' r t re iciro animum quoq; non mi-
lently to this purpofe 5 f If you nus efTe pufiiiis occuparum.
Obferve, fays he, that a manS Magnus ille remiffiui Joqui-
fpeech is too nice and critical, ^gfiUJESZ
be lure that; he has a mind ta- quam cur*. Senec. E$iJ»
ken up with little things. A cxv'
man of.a great mind fpeaks with the lefs cau-
tion and exa&nefs, whatfoever he fays, he is
better afTured of the matter of his difcourfe,
than to. trouble himfelf much about words.
This is the reafon that fo many great Authors
have afforded fo much work for the Criticks,
E 4 to
5 6 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
to blame, or to excufe them, and very often
to commend them lor departing from the
common forms. The Old Teftament has no-
thing of this nature, but what, for ought that
can now be known, was moft proper in the
Hebrew tongue, whatever it may be in others.
And as to the New Teftament," it is penned in,
fuch words, and in fuch conftrufrion of Gram-
mar, as. might render it moft ufeful, not ac-
cording to the Attkky or any other dialed,
which was known to fo few in coinparifon,
that it was confined, as it were, to one Coun-
try, or known only to the Learned in others 5
but in fuch Greeks as was generally underftood
in the remote and numerous Nations, where
that Language was fpoken. For which reafon
fo many expreflions are taken from thfc Tran-
slation of the Septuagint^ which was fo much
in ufe amongft the Prdfelytes. in all parts o£
the world. In the Preface to the Book of Ec-
clejiaflicus it is obferved, that the fame things
ottered in Hebrew and tranjlated into another
Tongue, have not the fame force in them 5 and
frj * St Jerom (hews, that there was a neceffity of
ad Amos, making ufe of fuch words, as were firft taken
v. 8. & in from the -Heathen Fables, in translating the
Gaiat^ Scriptures, which had no affinity to them; but
j. when men fpeak or- write, they muft 'do it fo
as to be underftood, unlefs they will do it to
nO purpofe ^ and therefore muft take fuel;
words as are to be had, and are intelligible to
thofe for whofe benefit they write, and tliey
muft
o/ the Chrifiian Religion. 57 '
muft be contented too with fuch Grammatical
conftru&ion, as well as with fuch words, as
(hall* be found expedient to the end for which
they write. * Sometimes again it. was necefTa- * Hieron.
ry to frame new words, to exprefs the Proprie-%12n al3t,I»
ty of the Hebrew Language, as Tully has done
in his Books of Philofophy, to. explain in La-
tin the terms of it in the Greek tongue. And
in all refpe&s men muft accommodate therh-
felves-to their fubjed/and to the capacities of
thofe for whom they undertake ' to difcourfe
upon J t.
II.' Metaphors, and Pvhetorical Schemes or
Figures of Speech. Men differ as much in their
forms and fchemes of fpeaking, as they do in
their manners pr cuftoms, 'or in their com-
plexions and dilpofitions. Every man has
fomething peculiar in his way of exprefiing
himfelf, which is fo eafily diftinguiihed by
good Criticks from that of others, that they
feldom fail in it, tho there can be no abfolute
certainty in thinss of this nature. Andd- Pho- * p,hot-,
' cod cc x\r
tins obferving that fome Orations which pafs*
under the name of Demofthenes, were, by rea-
fon of the difference of ftyle, afcribed by
certain Criticks to other Authors, makes this "
remark, that he had often taken notice of a
great refemblance in the ftyle of Orations
made by different Authors, and of as great an
tmlikenefs in the ftyle of thofe made by the
fame man. But the different character and
manner of ftyje in the fever.i! Countries and
Nations '
58 The Redfonablenejs and Certainty
Nations of the world is much more eafily difc
cerned, than it cart be in particular men of the
fame Country. Thr people of Carta, Phrygia
* Adfcive- anci My ft a were, not at all polite and neat *,
tamfuTs fays Tully, and. therefore they loved a grofs
auribus o- and flovenly kind of difcourfe, which the Rho-
q«^d<Km diaKS* no#t far diftant from them, never ap-
icun- proved of, and the other Greeks liked it much
*Sdja£kfa> but ^ie Athenians could not endure it.
S^isge- f There were, three .kinds of ftyle among the
nus. Cic. Greeks, the. Attick, the Afiatick and the Rho-
\ Qaintil. d-ian 5 and Tully befides makes the Afiatick
inftit. Hb. twofold. The Attick was clofe and compre- ♦
Gc-CBrut. henfive 5 the Afiatick was quite contrary to
this, and was very lofty, figurative and copi-
ous 5 which fome affigned to ■ other caufes,
but guintilian more truly thinks it proceeded
from the different nature and temper of the
• Athenians and Afiaticks. The third kind of
ftyle was the Rpodian, which was of a middle
nature betwixt the other two, neither fo con-
cife as the Attic, nor fo redundant as the Afia-
tick, but was a mixture of both $ the Genius of
that people inclining rather to the Afiatick,but
IE/chines in his BanilTimentat Rhodes reformed
their ftyle, and fafhioned it after the Attick
manner, as far as the Rhodian Genius would
admit of it. •
It would be endlefs to make obfervations
upon particular Authors. Xenophon and Plato
have not efcaped the Cenfure of Longinus 5
and Den/oflhenes and Cicero, befides what hath
been
" oftb? Ch rift tan Religion. 52
been obje&ed to them in particular, fall under
the general cenfure, which * Seneca pafieth * Nullum
upon all Authors of the greateft Fame and phcJtTn!
Merit 5 but he adds, that there is no certain genium.
rule for Style, which is continually altered by Da miht
1 r 1 n c 1 1 "3uem cun-
the ule and cultom ot the place. ■ que vis
magni no-
* minis virum, dicam, quid ilH setasfua ignoverit, quid in illo Sciens di£
limulaverit. Sen. Epift. cxiv.
Both the Language and Actions of the
Eaftern Nations, efpecially in the earlier ages
' of the world, had*fomething rrfore vehement
and paffionate irf them, than thofe of thefe
Weftern Coun treys. The Stiles and Titles of
of their Kings are a remarkable inftance of this 5
witnels that of Sapores *, Rex Regmim Sapor, * Ammi-
particeps fidernm, frater Solis & Lun<e ConJ2antizce\yino.
Cdfari, fratri nieo, Salutem plnrimam clico. And lib. 14. c
they retain the like Titles to this day $ f the l^^
Grand Siguier's is in fome things the fame, in mft.Ub. \.
others more extravagant 5 he is (tiled, God on c- 2-
Earth, the Shadow of God, Brother to the Sk?i
and Moon, the Giver of atl Earthly Crowns. The
King of * JEthiopia calls himfelr, the King at * Letter of
xchofe Name the Lyons tremble. • ?aJ'jJ- *"
The Romans themfelves, who ufed greater /» Geddes
modefty of ftyle, and more gravity in their church
aftions than many other Nations, practise! di-/Efhiop.
vers things in their Orations and Pleadings,
which amongd us would be very ftrange andt^'
abfurd. Thus f C. Gracchus, a great and pb-3. Qui'n
pular Orator at Rome, was wont to have oneti!- 1inLfti"
* ' ^ , tut. Jib. 1.
ltandc io.
de
lib.
6 o The Redfonahlenefs and Certaihty
ftand behind him with a Flute, to give him
the true Key, to which he was to raife his
voice ^ which would go near to make the beffc
Orator amongft us ridiculous. It was cufto-
mary likewife with the Romans, to ufe all arts
to raife the paflions, by Aftions and Reprefen-
* Cic. pro tations as well as by Words : * Sometimes they
• exno- would hang . up a Picture, reprefenting the
Fact about which they were to fpeak, and the
Accufers were wont to produce in open Court
a Bloody Sword, or the Garments of the
Wounded, an$ the Bones,, if any had been
taken out of their Wounds, or to unbind the
t,Q;u'ntlJ- wounds, or fhew the Scars. 4* gbtarum rerum
ib. lib. 6. . , • /i r» ■ r
ci. • wgens pleru-mque vis ejt0 velut in rem prejentem
animos hominum duccntiumy Thefe and other
things more ftrange to us,were pradtifed by the
mod famous Orators of their times amongft
the Romans, by which they fpoke to the eyes,
as it were, of their Hearers, and therefore
thefe may well be reckoned amongft the Fi-
? Cic. o-gures and Modes of Rhetorick, whereby they
iaNuL'a gained upon the affections of the people *.
perturba- Tully tells us of himfelfjthat he took up a Child
tic animi, fQrrietimes, and held it in his arms to move
poris ; "companion .$ and that f when M. Cdlidins had
frons non accufe'd c% Gdlihis of ati attempt, to poifon
noa fe-' bim, and had made it out by clear prqpt, he
imtrr ps- urged this, as a fuflicient objection a^ainft all
£isn(i:?uod that Callidhis- had faid, that he had not ex-
ivum cfi) prett any paflion in his pleading, he had
nSofup" not ^10te !^s Forehead , r.pr his Thigh,
K-ro'Brut. UOr
. of the Cbriftian Religion. € i
nor ("which was the leaft thing he could have
done, it his accufation had been true) he had
not fo much as ftampt with his Fpot. Calli-
dius had all the accomplilhments of an Ora-
tor* but this of moving the paflions by fuch
means ^ and the want of this was looked upon
•as a very great deleft .in him. Upon the
death of the two Scipio's in Spain , when the •
fignal of Battle was giyen. by, the new Gene- ■
ral, * Livy defcribes the Roman Army weep-ay ,™' \£
ing, and knocking their heads, and throwing
themfelves upon ■ the Ground. And what
could- a Speech at anytime have availed with
fuch men, that had been delivered in a cold
and ; unafFecling manner ? • f C<efar himfelf t Suet. .
wept, and rent his Garment in a Speech -Jul*
which he made tp his Souldiers, as foon as
he had paft the Rubicon. Whoever ob-
ferves their Orations •, would think * t»hat
the ancient Greeks and Romans had tears
more at command than men now have : for
the Orators wept as freely upon every oc-
cafion, as if that were true of them all,
which JEfchines * (aid of Demoflhenes, that * fflchlty
it was eaiier for them to weep , than for£onftr-
others to laugh. And fometimes not only te ip '
the Orators themfelves, f but the Judges oi+Cic. pro
the whole Auditory were all in tears. The pra0ncl^;,
great art of Oratory confided in A&ion, ( by ion. Pro
which is to be underftood both the voice andRabirio-
gefture) asDemofthenes, that bell: knew, de-
clared, and therefore' though .nothing were
more
6 b The Reafcnah/enefs and Certainty
more common than for Hiftorians, and Po
ers, and Philofophers to read their works to
the people, yet the Orators feldom read their
* Recke- Orations y however, * Tully fqmetimes did
turoratio, it. And from the time that Auguflus read his
qu* prop- speeches, which he had occafion to ufe in the
magnim- Senate, or to the People or Souldiers, it grew
dinem jnto a cuftom'by his . example and encourage-
di&a de i r . »j °
Scripto rnent, and lo contmu d. . .
eft Cic *
Pro Plancio. Ac ne periculum memoriae adiret, aut in edifceodo tem-
pus abfumeret, inftituit recitare omnia. Suet, in Auguft. c. 84. vid. ib.
c. 89. Quanquam Orationes 5c ryjftri quidam 8c£rxci leftitaverunt.
Plin. lib. 7. Epift. 17.
■
t Qua . The common f Forms of Speech even a-
one?flfrte-monS tne R°mdn Country men , were fo Me-
quentiffi- taphorical, that they will fcarce bear a Ijteral
me Sermo verfion into our Language. AndthePhilo*
utiter non fophers themfelves had cuftoms which may
modour- feem very odd to us : it * was a cuftom among
edam Ku- tn-em wnen they propounded a queftion , to
fticorum .offer with it a dryed Fig, and he that accept-
Siquidem e^ f tjie p-_ thereby undertook to anfwer
eft eorum n-
gemmare the queltJOn. ■ . ■
vites, (Iti-
re agros , Jams eflfe fegetes, luxuriofa frumenta. Nihil horum earum
audader, &c. Cic. Orator.
* Joac. Kuhnii obfervat. ad Diog. Laert.
The Figurative expreffions of the Prophets
and their Types and Parables^ were fuitable to
the cuftoms of the places and times wherein
they lived, and very fit to give a lively and
arTe&ing reprefentation of the Nleflage they
had to deliver. Thus for inftance, it was a
£U-
cj the Chifiian Religion. * 6 j
cuftcmary thing in thofe Ccuntr^ys to rend
their Garments, to pluck eff their Hair, to
go bareicct, and cover their faces, in time of
grief and trouble, which would be looked
upon as a certain fign of difira&icn amongft
us, but was commonly done by the graveft
and wifeft. men in thefe parts of the world.
And the expreflicns of their Joy and other
Pailions, were prcpcrticnble to thofe of their
forrow. Now it was reafonable, that the
Prophets in delivering their Prophecies (could
accommodate themfelves both in their words
and actions, to the people to whom they were
to be delivered : For elfe they would never
have been regarded, or would have made lit-
tle or no impreflion upon their minds, which
caufed the falfe Prophets to take the fame me- .
thod, I Kings .22. 2.
It is * Origen's obfervation, that the Pro«*Orig«i,
phets fometimes had matters of fmall ]'m^r'Ceinrub
tance revealed to them , as when Samnel^Q- 1.
quaintcd Saul, that the AiTes were found ,
i Sam. 9. 20. that they might keep the peo-
ple from going to falfe Prophets to.be fa-
tisfy'd in fuch things ^ befides that, by this
means they gained authority to be rely'd up-
on, .when they had affairs of the greateft con-
fequence* to ioretel. And there was reafon,
that in every cafe, they mould make all ne-
cellary allowances for the infirmities of the
people with whom they had to do, and
fliould ufe all fitting compliances with them,
that
^4 The Reafonab/enefs and Certainty
that they might the more prevail with them
for their good. •
* Hier. in it is the cuftom of the Prophets,as •* St Jerom
Abdiam. 0kferveSj when they fpeak againft Babylon, the
Ammonites, the Moabites, the Philijlines, and o-
ther Nations, to ufe many expreflions'and idi-
oms of the language of the people concerning
+ Ijishr| whom they Ipeak. f One who was as con-
Talmud verfant in the Jervifi Learning as mod: men
exerck.on have been, tells us, that their Books abound e-
Mact. J3-very w]icre with Parables, that Nation • incli-
Famiiiate ning by a kind of natural Genius to this fort of
&fiMx? ^n(-tor^c^- And lt ^s to De conlidered, that
me Pak-feveral things, which afe fet down as Matter
ftinis ad0f Yad;, might not be actually done, but only
fenno"1 reprefented as done,* to make the more, lively
nemfuutftjtnprefEon upon the Hearers and Readers,
jwgere," wno we^ enough underftood, 'that it was not '
&c. Hier. neceflary, that thefe things ihould be actually
in Matt, p^gionued . but they might be only paraboli-
cal defcriptions or repretentations of Matter of
Fact, the better to illuftrate ajid convey thofe
'commands and inftru&ions to their minds,
* Hier., in which' were to be delivered. Thus * St Je-
?wx'n.8cyom and Matmonides .underftood EzekfeFs ly-
comment.ing on his fide for three hundred and ninety
Mammon days, and Hofeas marrying an Adulters, only
More We- as Similitudes, or Parables and Figures of
vocb.Part. Speech 5 and thus f rom the Ancient Rabbins,
c' 4 ' they interpret both what is related of thefe
'• two Prophets, and that which is faid of Jcre.
mak's hiding his Girdle in Euphrates. This
was
of the Chriflian Religion. 6$
was themoft intelligible and effectual way that
could be made ufe of to a people, among
whom fuch figurative expreflions were ufual,
and known to mean no more than what they
were intended for. So Jeremiah is fa id to be
* fet over the Nations, and over the Kingdoms, * s,c dl"
to root out, and to pull down, and to (lefiroy^ Hiftorici
and to throw down, to build and to plant, Jer« eos occi-
i. io. becaufe he was appointed to prophefie^' •?£?"
of all thefe things. Ezekiel fpeaks of himfelf dem
as coming to deftroy the City, - becaufe he pro- J"™™",
phefied that it ihould be deftroy ed, Ezek- 40. comment.
9. and the fame Prophet in his defcription of a^ Theo-
the City and the Temple, has, delineated thech"ac>.
Temple larger than all the earthly JerufJem, *k* ao-
and Jerufalem larger than the whole land of >eW**.
Canaan,to (hew the Jews the neceflity of under-
ftanding him in a myftical and fpiritual fenfe^
f as one has obferved, who very well under* \^$£*'0c
(food the dimenfions of both. And thus Ez%- the Tempu.
kid was alfo carried from place to place in ch- ll-
fifion only, as the Text feems toexpflefs, Ezek.
11. 1. 40. 1, 2. as the Jews * in- St. Jeroms *Hier .
time undeiftood it-, and as the Chaldce Para- Dan.
phfafe interprets it. But Hofea might be com-
manded either in vifion or in reality to marry
a woman who had been an Adultrefs, but
f afterwards became chafte and vertuous 5 L^ndut
Prophera
interim, ut fequamur hiftoriam, fi meretricem converterit ad pudt
ciciam, fed potius laudandus, quod ex mala bonam fecerit id. Com
ment. in Hof. c. I.
F thereby
66 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
thereby to fet an example to the Ifrac/ites^
who had gone a whoring after other Gods, that
if they would forfake their falfe Cods, and
return to the true God, the God of their Fa-
thers, he would ftill accept and receive them,
in like manner as the Prophet had took an
Adultrefs to wife, upon aflurance that (he
would prove faithful to him. However this
be underftood, thefe actions, and others of
like nature, are to be look'd upon no other-
wife than as the ftyle of Scripture, or as cer-
tain ways of expreffing the Divine. Will to
Aa!omm meru For t^ie m*nc* may ^e expreft by * A&i-
quafi cor- ons as well as* by Words, and whatever A&i-
porisquae- Q s were perform'd with this intention, pro-
dam elo- . r , , , j . r rL 1 r i *p
quentia. perly come under the notion ot ltyle, or dii-
cic. Ora- ferent ways and modes of expreflion s and all
objections made againft them under. any other
potion, proceed upon a miftake, and can be
of no force.
The Prophetick fchemes of Speech which
feem molt ftrange to us, were ufual with the
t Com- Eaftern Nations, f as Mr Mede (hews of the
Apocal11 Indians, Perfans and Egyptians. The Rcve-
Fart, i.' lation of St John chiefly confifts of allufions to
the Cuftoms, and Hiftory, and Notions, and
Language of the Jews, as he and Dr Lightfoot
have (hewn in many places, which are moft
contrary to our manner of fpeaking. And
fome paffages allude to the cuftoms of other
Nations, well known and pra&ifed at that
time. Thus the Slaves were wont to have
their
of the Chrifiian Religion* 6j
their Mafters Name or Mark upon their Fore*
head, and the Souldiers to have the name of
their General upon their Right hand $ and
the like marks were wont to be received by
men, in token that they had devoted them-
felves to xjieif Gods : from whence we read
of the mark of the Beafi received by his Wor-
th ippers, /";/ their right Hand or in their Fore-
heads , f Rev. 13. 16. and of his Fathers*. Vid- ,
Name written in the Foreheads of thofe , that Joc# *
ftand in Mount Sion with the Lamb, Rev. 14. 1.
St Paul alludes to the Grecian Games in his
Epiftle to the Corinthians, who were much
addicted to thofe fports, and had one fort of
them, the Ifthmian, perforrn'd among them,
1 Cor. 9. 24, 25. and he alludes to the diftin-
ction among the Romans, between Freemen
and Slaves : For which h£ gives this reafon,
that it was in condefcention to them, I f peak
after the manner of men , becaufe of the infirmity
of your flefe, Rom. 6. 19. Melchifedec is faid
to be without Father, without Mother, without
defcent, Heb. "7. 3. becaufe his Pedigree is un-
known 5 which was a mod lignificant way of
expreffion to the Jews, who were fo careful
and exact in their Genealogies. But the very
fame manner of expreffion is alfo. ufed f bytPatre
Livy, Horace and Seneca upon the like occa- nuiio,nu-
r- •' r tre ierva.
hons. . Liv. iib.4.
: c- 3- '
nulhs majoribus ©rtos Horac.Serm. lib.r. fat.6.— — duos RomanosReges
efle quorum alter Patrem non haber, alter Matrem. Nam de fervij Ma-
tre dubitatur : Anci Pater nullus ;- Nume nepos dicitur. Sentc. Epift.
c. 8.
F 2 Therc
6 S 1 l)e K < an J Certainty
Nature, bal vzt) raucl:
in the
Sc
i
17, 1 ;. and 1
i
ivn-
I . •■;. >. cry in J
ftin-
g .
ral for M<
of
of the Cbriflian Religion. 69
ophy in Profe till the time of Cyrus, fc
' Pliny tells us Pherecydes firft wrote in P^fe; * *|«J»
which mult be undei of Philc for5 .
he alcribes the firft writii goi Profe in Hiftory ?. c r£
to Cddmrt/Mtle/tMf.&nd th / ^t/!^"
extant in Profe, Herodotus. Thkcydidrs ,and Xe*loc.
nophon have man) I -'-
dom or never met withal betides,
Poets. //. Stephens made a f the
Poetical words ufed by Xenophon, w
prefix'd to his Works. And the Orators both
Oflg the Greeks and Romans, we; aft
and curious in the Feet and Meaiure of their
Prof.-, as the Poets could be in Verfe. Great
part of the Scriptures is in Verfe, and tl
lercnt way of writing i ind
Nations, appears* in nothing more, t
the feveral forts of Poetry. That v. Ti-
ling a4I Verfe in EUiime, which irwt.':efe pans
of the World is moft inufeand efteem, would
have been ridiculous to the. Greek* and Ro-
n/easts : Tho' the ufe of [Chime in Verfe is fo
fir from being example in Antiquity, that it is
perhaps the moft ancient of all way wri-
ting Verfe. Acrofricks, tho' of no e< teem, and
Jittle us'd in many Age$ and Countries, are of
great Antiquity. Vcrfes IbmpoCed in the A-
►ftick and Alphabetical way, were found to
be a help to the M and this benefit, and
the ornament which it >vas then fuppofed to
give to Poems, is the caufe why it is fometimei
ufed in the Scriptures : and fometimes the In-
F 3 fpira-
jo The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
fpiration was fo ftrong upon the Writers mind,
as to interrupt the Art and Method, which he
hod propofed to himfelf, as Pf. 25. and 145.
cr perhaps it might be cuftomary upon certain
occaGgns to omit fbme Letter in the Alphabet
iii fuch compoiitions, for reafons which we
are ignorant of, but which might be very fa-
tisfa&ory and agreeable to the fenfe of thofe
• Athenat. Times and Countries. * The :ah «*/>**©■ is
c. iJ.°" an example of this among theGreeks, ufed by
t Cafaub. Vitidar and other ancient- Poets : . The old f
inAthen. Spartan, Dqrick and JEolick Dialed changed
'2 into P, the rough found of this Letter being
more agreeable it Teems to thofe People ^ and
if any of them had written Acrofticks and Al-
phabetical Pcjems, 2 would have been omit-
ted. Rhophalick Verfes, which begin with a
Monofyllable, every word encreafing by one
fyllable more than the former, are to be found
in Homer .-*and the Leonine or Monkifti Verfes
with a double Rhime, one in the middle, and
the other at the end,are not without precedent;
To fay nothing of the Poems compofed of di-
vers forts of Verfe, and 'framed into the fhape
of feveral things by Simmias Rhoditts, fome of
which are afCribed to Theocritus* The Repe-
titions fo frequent gi Homer, were not for
want of words, (for no Author ever wanted
them lefs than he) but out of choice, though
larter Poets have not thought fit to imitate him
in this, and Martial turn'd it to Ridicule. It
is certain that nothing is more various, than
the
of the Chriftian Religion. 7
the Wit and Fancy of Man, and it is as certain,
that whoever would write to any purpofe,muft
write in fome fuch manner, as the temper of
the people, to whom he writes, will bear, and
as their cuftoms require.
But before I leave this particular, it* may be
proper to c'onfider the ftile of Scripture, in the
Metaphorical and Figurative ufe of words, in
fpeaking of the Works and Attributes of God.
There never was any Book written in a ffcridt
a*nd literal propriety of words, becaufe all
Languages abound in Metaphors, which by
conftant ufe become perhaps better known to
the Natives of a Country, than the original
words themfelves, and in proceis of time of-
ten caufe them to be quite laid afide. But then
this borrowed and Metaphorical fenfeof words
may be very ftrange to Men of «other Coun-
tries, efpecially when they are taken for things
peculiar to the place, where they are ufed.
The Horn of the Son ofOyl (ignifies in our way
of expreflion a very fruitful Hill, Ifa. 5. 1. and
Horn fign*ified fit ength in the Hebrew Tpague,
as familiarly, as Robur ox Oak fignifies the fame
in Latin.
And not only the Valleys are faid to fljotrt
and fing, Pf. 65. 13. but the befi Fruits in the
Land, are in the Hebrew called the finging of
the Land, Gen-. 43. 1 1. The word Rock is often
ufed to denote the Almighty Power of God,
and by the Septnagint and vulgar Latin, is
fometirnes translated God. For their Rock **
F 4 not
72 The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
not as our Rock, even our Enemies being Judges,
Deut. 32.31. thofe verfions render it their
Gods, and our God, and in like manner, v. 4,
15, 18. Pf 31. 3. 73. 26. // f£ere */y G^ be-
fides me*? yea. there is no God, I know not any,
Ifai. 46. 8. in the Hebrew it is, there is no
Rock, as the Margin of our Bibles remarks.
This ufe of Metaphors arifeth partly from
the Ukenefs that is perceiv'd between things,
which makes one thing to be expreft by ano-
ther, and gives a delightful illustration CO the
things difcourfed of, and partly from our
want of fit words to exprefs the various na-
tures of things, efpecially of things fpiritual,
which we commonly fpeak of in Negative
terms, and rather deny, that they are like
things fenQt>le, than pofitively affirm what
they are: Thus we fay that they are imma-
terial, inviftble, incorruptible,^. And when
we fpeak pofitively of them, we muft ufe fuch
words, as fenfible objects can furnifh us with-
al, (J nee we can have no othqr, 5 for. we under-
fh.-.d 'their Nature fo imperfectly, that we are
noi able to frame a Language on purpofe to
exprefs it 5 and he who (hould go about fuch,
a work, would neither be underftood by o-
thers, nor well known what he meant him-
felf. But of all Beings, God himfelf is fo.far
above our comprehenfion, that we can never
Fpeak of him in exprellions fuitable to his
Divine Nature, and therefore when true con-
ceptions are had of him, it is fitteft to fpeak
• of*
of the Chriftian Religion. 7 3
of him in fuch terms, as many ferve to raife
and preferve in us a due fenfe oi Gods Ho-
nour, and of our duty to him. The Reafons
then, why God is often fpoken of in the
Scriptures, after the manner m which we are
wont to fpeak of men, may be reduced to
thefe particulars*
1. Theufe of Metaphorical and Figurative '
expreflions is ufual in all Languages, and no
Language is fufficient to fet forth the . Majefty
and Attributes of God.
"2. The peculiar Nature and Genius of the
Hebrew Tongue, inclined or conftrained the
Writers, in that Language, to exprefs them-
felves in this manner, Gen. 9. 5. at the hand of
every Beaji will I require it, that is, I will re-
quire it of every Beaft. Sin in the Hebrew
fignifiesa Sin-offering, as it is tranflated, and
muft of neceffity be underftood in many places
of Scripture, and in this fenfe Chrift was made
Jin for us, 2 Cor. j. 21. We read Jof. 24.27.
that Jojhna faid unto all the people, behold this
ftone {hall be a witnefs unto us.'For it hath heard
all the words of the Lord, which he [pake unto
us,'itfhall therefore be a witnefs unto you, lefl
ye deny your God. This might have been a
very improper and unintelligible Speech to a-
nother people, but was mod fignificant and
emphatical to the^fcple oflfrael, who well
underftood upon Wm account fenfe was often
afcribed to inanimate things, as Gen. 31. 52.
Num. 20. 8. Deut. 4. 26. 30. 19. 32. 1. and
af-
74 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
afterwards frequently by the Prophet
3. An exprefs Law was made againft th
worfhipping of God under any Image or Simi-
litude, and the people are put in mind, that
thty faw no Jinzilitude, but only heard a voice,
when the Lord fpake to them from the Mount,
Devi. '4. 1 2. and that he is without change or
.•repentance, Num. 23. 19. 1 Sam* 15. 29. Ma-
lach* %- 6,
4. When this caution had been given, and
fuch a Law made, it cannot be expe&ed, but
that the Divine Writers fhould make ufe of
fuch expreffions, as were commonly ufed, and
were as commonly undfcrftood in a Metapho-
rical or improper fenfe, when applied to God 5
to -give the more force and emphafis to their
n'Sfore difcourfe, * Maimomdes has proved from the
Mevoch. propriety of the Hebrew words, that the Image
Par. 1. c. an(j Ufemrs 0f God, in which man is faid to
t8,35*.48.; have been made, is to be underftood of the.
faculties of his Mind -0 and he lays this down
• as a general and known rule amongft the Jews,
Loquitur Lex fecundumlinguam Filiorum homi-
num^ and he likewife obferves that both On-
kplos and Jonathan have in their Paraphrafes
taken care to give the true fenfe of fuch ex-
preffions, as feem to imply any thing corpo-
real in God. The Scriptures make mention
of his eyes, and hands a^^eet, to exprefs the
effe&s of thofe A&ionsjB Bich are performed
by men with thefe mernDers : and when it
was faid, it repented the Lord that he had
made
of the Chriftia?i Religion. 75
made man on the Earthy and it grieved him at
his hearty Gen. 6. 6. This was well under-
ftood to mean no more than that God a&ed,
as men are wont t® do, when they change
their minds, and repent and grieve at what
they have done, and that he would certainly
deftroy the world which he had made : for
Mofes himfelf inftru&s the Children of Ifrael,
that God is without any bodily fhape or fub-
ftance, and therefore cannot be faid to have
any heart, or to be grieved at his heart in the
fame fenfe, that it is faid of men. And Num.
23. 19. it is declared, that God is not a man,
that he Jhould lye, neither the Son of man , that
he fhould repent. And when God fays that it
repented him that he had fet up Saul to he King,
1 Sam. 15. 11. this is explain d v. 29. where
we read, that the ftrength oflfrael will Trot lye, ■
nor repent 5 for he is not a man that he fljould
repent :. and yet again in the laft verfe it is
faid, that the Lord repented, that he had made
Saul King over Ifrael. The moll: carelefe wri-
ter could not fo foon and fo often forget
himfelf: but what is faid of Gods repenting,
is to be taken in an improper and. figurative
fenfe, to imply that God would act in that
cafe, as men aft when they repent of what
they have done, tho without any .change of
mind, or any grief, or other pafllon in him at-
tending it : pie effect was the fame as if God
had repented , and therefore by a Metony-
my the effect is expreft by that which in men
is
7 6 The Keafonable?iefs an J Certainty
is wont to be the caufe of fuch effects, tho
repentance was not the caufe of it 5 but the
reafon and ftate of the cafe, which he had
fully known and confiderecl from all eternity,
and therefore could not be furprized, or mo-
ved to any alteration of Judgment by it. His
foul was grieved fir the miferyoflfrael, Judg.
left 16. or, it was fjortned, as the Hebrew word
is literally tranflated in the Margin, that is,
according to * Nhimonides, the
vochMl'pT,Mc?4.^;: LorJs mind was bonened from
Part. 3. c. 54. afflicting them, or he had no lon-
t Non enim aliquid mjnd t iflj tj wfa
ignorac Deus , ut exa- © . . r .
minando cognofcar, fed God is laid to lee, the meaning is,
fdac Deus, ita dixit be- tilat [ie knoWs what is done$ when
f^u^fecundammVd0! he is faid to hear, this fignifies,
tentat vos Deus Domi- that he understands what is faid.
nferit!' id™ « t Nw / W* that thoHfearcJt God,
fcire carreros faciat. Hi- Gen. 22. 12* that IS, DOW I have
won. in Job. c. 31, <5. |iad fag proof of it, and have
made it evident, that I know it. To prove
thee, to know what was in thine heart, Deut. 8.
2. is the fame, as to make that appear, and be-
come known, which I know to.be in thine
heart, Gen. n. 5. the Lord is faid to come
down to fee the City and Tower of Babel, and
Gen. 18. 20. Becaufe the cry of Sodom and Go-
morrah is 'great, and becaufe their fin is very
grievous, I will go down now and^ee, whether
they have clone altogether according to the cry
of it, which is come unto me, and if not, I will
know: which implies, that God is not for-
ward
of the Chriftian Religion. jy
ward or willing to punifti, bat that he pro-
ceeds as men do in things about .which they
ufe raoii care and deliberation. God is repre-
fented as a good Governour, who is unwil-
ling to believe ill Reports, and will make a
full enquiry and infpe&ion into the cafe, be-
fore he punifti offenders $ or in fhort, here
is an illuftration in Fad of that adorable cha-
racter, which God' proclaims of himfelf, the
Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious,
long-fujfering and abundant in goodhefs and
truth, Exod. 34. 6. God fays, that he could
not deftroy Sodom till Lot was efcaped out of
it, Gen. 19. 22. and to Mofes he fays. Now
therefore let me alone, that my wrath may wax
hotagainfl them, and that I may consume them,
Exod. 52. 10. But we muft not imagin that
the Reafons and Motives which Mojes there
reprefents to God in his prayer in behalf of
the people of Ifrael, could prevail more with
him, than his own infinite Wifdom and
Goodnefs,or that he could not have preferved
Lot in the midft of Sodom, as well as he deli-
vered Shadrach, Mefidch and Abednego out of
the Fiery Furnace. But thefe things are thus •
expreft for an encouragement in Righteouf-
nefs, and to teach us dependance upon God $
for the righteous have power with God as well
as with men, and (hall prevail, Gen. 32. 28. It
was an exercife and trial of the Faith and
Charity of Mofes, and is propofed as an ex-
ample of Faith and Charity to all, who
mould
j2 The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
(hould read that account of him. Befides, he
was a Type of Chrift, and as fuch, was to
make interceflion and attonement for the fins
of the People, Exod. 32: 30. For Chrift be-
fore his coming in the Flem exercised his Me-
diatory power, as to the vilible adminiftration
of it , by thofe who were appointed to be his
Types and Reprefentatives here upon Earth,
which may give a fatisfactory account of that
power, which Abraham, Jacob and Mofes, and
others are faid to have had with God.
The fumm of all is, that to give the more
Force and Life to the Difcourfes of the Pro-
phets, and to render them- the more effectual
to the ends, for which they were defigned ,
God, who is by the infinite excellency of his
Nature, uncapable of any Paflion, is pleas'd to
be reprefented as fubjed to Love, and Anger,
and Hatred, and all thePaffions of Humanity -0
and He, who knows perfectly all events from
Eternity, is contented even to feem fometimes
to doubt of the effects of his defigns and pro-
pofals, and of the events of humane Actions 5
, 0 . to (hew, as * Origen, St. Jerom and Theodora
Phiiocai" have obferv'd, the freedom of Men, and to
c.23.Hie- declare, that their deftruction is from them-
Theodo- felvcs. He fpeaks to us in the Language of
ret. Men, and affumes to himfelf all the Paflions of
\ J Jzek' humane nature, that by any means finners may
be perfv/aded to turn to him $ he is defcribed
•as angry, and grieved at the fins of Men, and
as one, who rejoyceth at their Repentance :
not
. of the Chriftian Religion. j$
not that the Divine Nature can be capable of
Anger, or Grief, or Rejoicing, which imply
change and imperfection, and therefore muft
be impoffible in the moft abfolutely perfeft Be-
ing: but becaufe Men are wont to be angry,
when they punifti, and to be grieved when
thofe do amifs whom they wouid have do
well, and are'wont to rejoice when they be-
gin to reform 5 therefore to fet forth, that
God will certainly punifh unrepenting Sinners,
and receive. the returning Penitent, and reward
the Righteous, both theGoodnefs and Juftice
• of God are explain'd in jTuch terms, as may
moft move and arfe& Men, to (hew that the
pununmen.ts he inrli&s, will in the end be as
grievous", as if he receiv'd Tome lofs and dis-
appointment by the obftinacy of the picked 5
and that he will as bountifully reward the
Good, as if they had done him fome great be-
nefit and kindnefs, and had made fome addi-
tion to his own Joy and Happinefs, which is
infinite and eternal, and therefore uncapable
of any.
3. The Decorum or fuitablenefs of the mat-
ter in the ftile of Scripture. This is to be#
confidered with refpeftto thePerfons, theOc-"
caiion, and Time and Country ^ the Rules of
Decency being variable according to Circum-
ftances, not flx'd and immutable , as the
Precepts of Morality are. * Maimonides has * More
obferv'd, that the Holy Tongue has no words paervf°ci
to exprefs things obfcene : and 'tis very re-
< markable
80 The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
markablc, that in thofe ruder Ages (as they
are commonly reckon'd) the Hebrews had pe-
culiar forms of Decency in their Expreffions,
upon all occafions which required them. And
to know in that fignification, which it hath
Gen. 4. 1. .and in many other places of Scrip-
ture, was likewife ufed by the Greeks, and' is
particularly taken notice of by *
* Hermog. de Invent. Vj r ~t. j n_ c -
lib. 4. c. u. nermogenes tor the modefry of it.
t Vid. Athene lib. 1. We find the Heroes of f Homer
^n^fii&ii* emPloy'd in as mean Offices as the
ftruTimus quifq; Paftor Pa triarchs,and * Herodotus declares,
ertt,utoftenditGreca& tfc.n in Ancient Times, the Greeks
Latina Lingua & vete res ' . ^ •
Foetse. Varro de Re uad vo Servants, but did their own
^■lib, 2- c- T- ^ work themfelves, or had no other
. c. 137. ^c^ ^^^ ^at ^ tiiejr Children 5
and 'tis reafonable, that their manner of fpeech
fhoul(t be fuitable to tlieir way of living, and
that the one thould have rio more of delicacy
in it than the other 5 and if there be any thing
in ibeii Writings, which is not fo agreeable to
the nicenefs of latter Times, it is an argument
of their innocence an^ purity, and of a native
fimplicity of manners, void of Pride, and of
fhame arifing from Guilt.
In matter? of Hiftory, feveral things may
be mentioned, not fo much for their own fake,
as becaufe they were memorable in thofe times,
and might help to keep up the Remembrance
of other things more confiderable. If Mofes
has related, who found the Mules in the Wil-
dcmefs, (for the original word is capable of
a
of the Chriflian Religion. 8 1.
a different fignification) * Homer has made the *'fi| Evs-
fame obfervation. Thechara&ers andfDeechesT*>>> *h*
ofperfonsin the Scriptures are exceeding na- •i^or«'
rural, and difcover all the unjffe&^i and in-*"'"*,""
imirable marks of Truth. They are fhort, y&Ti?*m
and contain fuch circumftances and thoughtS-iiiak 2.
as are not far fetcht, but arife from* the mat-
ter iri hand, and have manifeft influence' upon
the adlions themfelves. This may be feen in
the Hiftory of Jofcpb and his Brethren, and in
feveeal other paflages, wljich are fo naturally
related, that in fome of them the manner of
Relation, which- manifeftly fpeaks the truth
of what is delivered, has given occafion to
the cavils of fuch as have not well confi-
dered it. Saul enquired of Abner, whofe Son
David was $ Abner anfwered, he did not know 5
David was brought to Saul, who aske/1 him
the fame queftion, 1 Sam. \y* 55, 58. yet Saul
had fent to Jejffe for his Son David to play
before him upon the Harp, 1 Sam. 16. 19/
Grotius imputes this forgetfulnefs to the Di-
ftemper which Saul then laboured under, and
to the multiplicity of his affairs. But was it
ever expecf ed of any King, that he mould re-
member the names of the Fathers of all his
Servants ? Jeffe was an obfcure man, and Da-
vid had not then been fo much taken notice
of, "as that his Father's name mould be known
in Saul's Court, and Abner being abfent. with
the Army, might never fee David nor hear of
G him
8 2 The Reafor.ablenefs and Certainty
him before. In the Relation of Saul's Death,
the Meflenger who brought the news had de-
clared himfelf to bean Amalckitc ?,yet David af-
terward^cn quires of himjvhencc art thou .<? But
nothing could be more natural than for a man
in that confirmation to ask that queftion fo
loon after, 2 Sam. i.'8, 13. Some have al-
Jedged, that they could conceive noreafonfor
that paffage concerning the Arrows which Jo-
nathan was to (hoot , to give David notice whe-
ther he were to go, orftay, becaufe tho he did
(hoot in that manner, which by agreement was
to be a fign to him that he *nuft be gone, yet
they met and difcourfed together upon the
place, after Jonathan had fent his Servant
away. But it feems they had a more favou-
rable opportunity than they expected of con-
verting there : and tho this happened beyond
expectation, yet* the Sacred Hiftorian is fo
punctual as to acquaint us with that fign which
was given by an agreement made between
David and Jonathan, when they fuppofed that
it would not have been fafefor them to come J
to one another, 1 Sam. 20.
There is no nicer, fubject than when a man
is fore'd to fpeak of himfelf : Truth, if it be
to his own praife, will be rejected as falfhood,
or at leaft cenfured for vanity 5 and if he
blame himfelf, this will be fufpected as de-
signed only to extort a commendation from
others. And yet there are certain times and
occa-
of the Chrifiian Religion, 8 1
occafions, in which the wifeft and beft men
have thought it requifite to fpeak with great
freedom and opennefs of themfelves. There
1s a deference owing to Authority, and' a Re-
verence due tc? years, and therefore Ancient
men and men in Power may fpeak, as we fay,
with Authority 5 and any man may fpeak in his
Own vindication what would not become him
in another ca(e : Every man has a Right to
defend his own Innocence by all lawful means,
and to fpeak Truth cannot be unlawful, tho
it be in his own commendation 5 nor can
there be any indecency in it, when it is forced
from* him, for the good not only of hirnfelf,
but of others, who may fuffer by the fcandal
thrown upon him. All thefe circumftances
concurred in St Paul's cafe, who had the Au-
thority of an Apoftle, and the Reverence due
to Paul the Aged, and the Intereft of Souls to
plead for what he yet terms the folly of com-
mending hirnfelf in his own necelfary
Vindication. Plutarch in a fet difcourfe
upon this fubject determines , that a man
may praife hirnfelf, when it is necefTa-.
ry for his own defence, and when he may be-
nefit others by it. * Ncfior fpeaks of hirnfelf *Hoto.lii.
' with as great commendation, as he could have x-
. fpoken of any other man, but when the Au-
thority and Reverence due to his Age war-
ranted that freedom, and the neceffity of af-
fairs required it of him, it was not only al-
lowable , but very proper and requifite.
Q 2 fTul/y
84 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
* ^r'1 awfully obfervcs, that he might claim thispri-
mSi de vilege from his old Age. And Socrates him-
meipfo felf at his Tryal fpeaks very freely in his own
quan- ' commendation, which has never been menti-
quam eft oned to his difpraife, but as^n argument of
id quid em ^jg courage and innocence.
aerrstiq; ■
noftrae conceditur. 'Videtifne ut apud Homerum fepifTIme Neftor de
virtutjbus fuis praedicet PTertiam enim jam jetatem hominum vixerat,
neceratei verendum, ne vera de fe pr^dicans nimis videretur aut info-
lens aut loquax. Cic. de Seneft.
t Sum Pius ^tieas -j* Virgil makes lEneas
—Jama fuper xchera notus and j^^, fpcak of ^^
Th Good'-jEneas iam called, a Name felves in fuch a manner, as
While Fortune favour' d not unknown to j$ ]iarclly reCOncileable tO
turn's ego haud ulli veterum the Rules of Decency of
virtute fecundus our Times. Mr Drydett in
iTmZ'W'tbeh^'of aiu my his Tranflation faw it ne-
Nams cefTary to foften his expref-
emySl)Ui — » fions^ (hattney might be
more fuitable tp our cuftoms and manners.
But certainly if this were not agreeable to his
own Age, it was at leaft to that notion which
Virgil had of the Age in 'Which lEneas lived,
or elfe fo great a Matter of Decorum would
never have put fuch t words into the mouth
of his Hero. Yet thefe very words he had
$ v™ from f Homer, who makes them to be fpo--
ken by Vlyffis. Servius fays, Heroes were
teifoti
KKtQf K~
udy/r.ix. wont tnus to *Fak-
* Poets
of the Chriftian Religion. 85
*Poets likewife afTumed a *Jamq; opus exegi, quod nee Jo-
liberty of fpeakingbold ex- Nvis ira ™JLg™ ,
' * p iMec potent fer rum, ne,c edax a-
preiilOnS Concerning them- bolere vetuftus. Ovid Metam.
felves, upon pretence that J- ls-
. * r A . , r fcxe"i monumentum are perenm-
they were acted by iome us. Horat. carm.iib. 3.od.3o.
Divine Power, and there-
fore wer#e called Prophets 5 which is an argu-
ment that in the common opinion of men, in-
fpired Writers might life fuch forms of Speech
as would not be proper nor decent for others
to ufe. And this liberty was taken by Ora-
tors astwell as Poets, when the occaiion feem-
ed to require it, as may be obferved in * Ijo- * Panegr.
crates. For the ancient Orators too by Lon- ^J^na"
glnus's obfervation, pretended tofomething
more than humane, and would be thought to
fpeak by fome kind of impulfe 5 upon which
account this liberty might be allowed them.
But it may well be thought needlefs for me
to have ufed lb many words on this fubjed,
wlien there is fo little occafion for any ob-
jection of this nature in the Holy Scriptures 3
arid where-ever ifiere can be any pretence for
it, it has been confidered in its proper place :
but I thought it might not be labour ill be*
ftowed^ to (hew here befides, how bad Criticks
they are that can object at. this rate. I will
fay further, that the pailage, Tob. 5.16. con-
cerning the Dog which followed Tobias (which
has given occasion to unwary and unskilful
men to infult with fo much fcorn over a Book
that is very ufeful, tho not of Divine Infpira-
C 3 tion)
26 The Regfonabknefs an J Certainty
tion) is not only innocent,but agreeable to the
, , , N beft patterns of Antiquity,
- * ^om:'/°a ™ *??°' * Homr and Virgil ? who
N^non&Wmi'iicuftodcs limine thought it a very proper
abako and natural ornament of
Prbcedunt, Greflumq; canes comi- tlicir PoemS tO defcribe
tanrur henlem. /fcn. 8. . .
Hpc & in Homero 'eftum eft Dogs following their Ma-
&in Hiftoria Romana.qu* ait : Sy- fterg fl^^ fpeakitlS of
phax inter duas canes flans icipio- rr . J . *, y> _
n«m appellavir. Serv. ' Q ielemachus, and Virgil ot
Hvander. And Servius pro-
duceth an Example of the fame thing out of
the Roman Hiftory.
IV. As to the Method ufed in the Holy
Scriptures, there is no reafon to expecl: that
Prophecies mould be written according to the
order of time in which they were delivered,
or that Hiftorips mould be digefted into Dia-
ries or Annals, fince there may be Reafons,
whether known or unknown to us, why they
mould be othervvife placed ; And thus theLy-
"Vid. Hi- rick Poets, * who pretended to Enthufiafm,
HieK'-mte an^ an imitation, ss it were, of Prophecy, do
cap. 2i, riot confine themfelves to* obferve any order
of Time. Some things laft foretold rraaht be
firft to be fulfilled $ or fome things were more
or lefs remarkable, or concerned the Jews more
pr lefs than others 5 But generally in 'the Pro-
phetical Books of Scripture, what concerns the
fame fubjecr. is put. together, tho fcrc-tokl, or
failing out at different times,, that the clearer
t Hiereji. and more diuinct view may be had of it. This,
ad Ezech. as * gc jer0l7I obferves, is the caufe of divers
cap. 29, J ' ^ r,
3o. Train-
of the Cbriftian Religion. 8 7
Tranfpofitions in point of Time, in. the Pro-
prieties of Jeremiah and Ezekjel 5 and f he takes t U. *&
notice, that Darnel having fet down the Pro- Dan- c* 7-
phecies, which had relation to the feveral
Reigns of Nebuchadnezzar, Belfiazzar, Darius
ox Cyrus, according to the order of Time, af-
terwards declares the Revelations that were
made to him, that had no dependance upon
the times in which they were made, but were
written for the benefit of Pofterity. But the
feveral Tranfpofitions in the Scripture are fuf-
ficiently accounted for by Commentators.
And itmuft be obferved, that the Sacred Wri-
ters mention no more of Civil affairs than was
nectfary to their purpofe 5 and therefore in
many things they refer to the Hiftories then
extant, for a fuller account of them : their de-
fign was not. to write a compleat Hiftory of all
events, but they confine themfelves to fueh as
were moft fit for them to take nGtice of, and
keep within the compafs of their proper
bufinefs.
It was expedient that the fame Do&rines
mould be repeated in divers places of Scri-
pture, and inter^perfed with other things, ac-
cording to no certain Art or Method, becaufe
this prevents their being corrupted or falfified,
as they might have been; if they had been all
reduced to feveral diftinft Heads, and placed'
according to the Rules of Art. If one Pro-
phet repeats what another Prophet had faid,
this is to give ic a new confirmation, to re-
G 4 . vive
8 8 ■ The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
vive the remembrance, and (hew the certainty
and importance of it. It is ordinary in the
beft Authors not only to find the fame things
repeated in divers places of their Works, but
to meet with them repeated in the very fame
words v thus Ifocrates, Xenophon and Damojl-
henes tranferibe in- one part of their Works
what they have written in another $ but none,
I think, fo frequently as Dewofthettes : tho
* <rvi»M( * Z)tp7dv has obferved, that this was a ufua]
>«? jnsro thing vyith the Ancient Writers. It was cu.
Z~m ftcmary like wife with the Philofophers ir*!af£v
Ktuals or to •'dlude to the Verfes of Homer, and to
Ujp. E- apply them with little variation upon all oc-
mrr.Oiat.ca(]onS? as may be feen frequently in Diogenes
fthen. Laertius.
tont. Mi- All the cavils therefore that are mode a-
iam' gainft the ftyle of Scripture proceed from ig-
norance of Antiquity, and from ra(hnefs in
judging of ancient Times and foreign Conn-
treys by our own. Whoever would, either
delight or profit, muft fpeak and act in fome
meafure according to the genius of the people
with whom he converfes : and if we will but
read the Scriptures, with the tame candour
and refpect with which . I the Writings
of Human Authors, and confider the Times,
and Peribns, and the Oecafions upon which
they wcr,e written, there is-nothirrg that can
n harm or improper either in the words or
actions of thfcJperfons infpired (Tor it was the
tinerof thofe Countries to fpeak by their
actions
•
of the Cbriftian Religion. 89
actions almoft as much as in words, ) If we
will but obferve the circumftances in which
the feveral parts of the Scriptures were writ-
ten, we (hall find caufe to admire the Simpli-
city, and Plainnefs and Modefty of the ftyle
of the Scriptures.
in many Books of the Scriptures the ftyle is
fublime an<2 elegant, beyond any thing to be '
found,jn other Writings, and yet as natural as
if it could not have been ctherwife expreft 5
and this is the true excellency of ftyle, that it
be plain and natural, and yet eloquent. Lon-
gitius gives a high character of Mofes's ftyle in
a Book, the deiign whereof is to reprefent the
moft perfect Idea of Eloquence : indeed fuch
is the fitnefs both in Verfe and Profe of- the
words and ftyle of Mofis, lo admirably fuited
to the fubject upon all occafions, as if he had
been to prefcribe a pattern of true Eloquence,
as well as to enact Laws. H. Stephens has ob-
ferved that there is a great refemblance in He-
rodotm to die ftyle of the Scriptures : Herodo- .
tus had Homer in his view throughout his Hi-
ftory, and Homers expreilions are the fame
with thofe ufed in the Scriptures, in many in-
ftances, as particularly, when he fo often
mentions the children of the Tmjans, and the
children of the Greeks, as the Scriptures men-
tion the children of Ifrael $ and other Greek.
Authors fay, the children of the Phyficians,-
as the Scriptures fay , the children of the
Bride- chamber , and the' children of Light.
* Grotim
$0 The Reafonabfenefs and Certainty
* Grot, ad* Grotius compares Ifaiah to Demojihenes, a
%. zg'sc fublime, but a moft natural and judicious wri-
ad Ezech. ter : the fame Author compares Ezefyel to Ho-
init10' mer for the beauty and noblenefs of his ftyle.
iPref. to f Mr Cowley compares the Prophets, efpecially
o1friCaidtfa^ to Pindar : but of Pindar he fays, that
Nates uponif a man fiould undertake to translate him word
pind.ode pr worcl^ jf would be thought that on$ mad mart
'34' had tranflated another. For which he gives this
reafon, that wtfmufl confider in Pindar the great
difference of time betwixt hk Age and ours,
which changes us in Pictures, at leaf, the colours
of Poetry ^ the no lefs difference betwixt the Re-
ligions and Cufioms of our Countries, and a thou-
fand particularities of Places, Perfons and Man-
ners, which do but confufedly appear to our eyes at
fo great a dijlancc 3 and laflly, we muji confider
that&ur ears are fir •angers to the Mufck of his num-
bers .which fometimes(cfpecialiy inSongs andOdes*)
almoft without any thing elfe, makes an excellent
Poet. And of David he obferves; that the
beft Tranflators have been fo far from doing
Honour, or at leaf Jnfiicc to that Divine Poet,
that methinl\s, fays he, th(y revile him worfe
than Shimei. And Buchanan himfelf comes, m
his opinion,, no lefs ftjort of David, than his
Country does ^'Judea. Yet Ifaiah and the reft
of the Prophets and. the P films are tranflated
into our Language word for word, as far as
•it is poiiible for one Language to be thus ren-
der ci into another : and notwithstanding all
the differences of Time, and Place, and Q:-
(toms,
of the Chriftian Religion. 91
ftoms, and Perfons, no fenfible man reads
them in the Engliflj Tongue, bat he muft ac-
knowledge that their ftyle, with all thefe dis-
advantages , is truly great .and excellent.
Whereas * there are- none .
c ■> rj .1 A,u-1-,^t-e Quod ficui non videtur Lin-
OI tne tieatiien AUCnorS, gU?e gratiam interpretation mu-
that are fo mUCll efteemed, tari, Homerum ad verbum expri-
ixrhirh if fnpv wprp lifprqL mat inLatinum. Plus aliquid di-
wnictt, it tney were literal. cam . eflndem infu5 Hngud profe
ly tranflated, aS the Sen- verbis interpretetur, videbit crdi-
PtUreSare, WOUld bear thS nemridiculumA'Poetamelwiaen-
r .. \ - ,i tiflimum vix loquentem. Hieron.
•reading, but they would praf.inchron.£ufeb.
appear ridiculous and im-
poflible to be underftood. For the Spirit, and
Genius, and peculiar Idioms of moft Tongues
being fo very different one from another, and
depending upon the Cuftonfc and Humours of
the people of feveral Countries, it was the
evident care and providence of God, to caufe
great part of the Scriptures, tho written by fo
many different men, and at fuch diftant times,
and fome Books of them in the earlier Ages of
the World,to be penned in fuch a language and
ftyle,as is moft natural,and which without any
want ofArt exceeds the moft artificial and ftu-
died Eloquence in fublime and noble thoughts
and expreflions , and in all the beauties and
ornaments of Speech : and yet, which in all
theaiecefliry points of Salvation is eafie to be
underftood, under all the difad vantages of a
Verbal Tranilation, by men of ordinary capa-
cities, who live fo many Ages after. The
Proprieties of ICuah cannot be, read, or heard,
or
92 The Reafonab/enefs and Certainty
or thought of without being mo\*ed by them:
with what Life then, with what Zeal and
Flame mud they have been delivered ? And
what a mighty Blefling was fuch a Prophet to
his own Age, and to all fucceeding Generati-
ons > Of Royal Blood, and of a Style and
Behaviour fuitable to his Birth $ of Divine
Virtues, aad of Divine Eloquence ! He de-
clares things, which were not to be fulfilled
till many Ages afterwards, as plainly as if he
. had teen them before his eyes,, and would*
make all others to fee them 5 he fpeaks of
Chrift as dearly, as if with Simeon he had had
liis Saviour in his arms, or with the Wife men
had been kneeling down before him, and prc-
fenting him witlrmore precious Gif ts,than any
they had to offer 3 and defcribes his Pailion
as fully, as if he had followed him through
every part of it, and having been Crucified
.with him, had been jufl: entringwith him in-
to Paradice. If this be thought a i Digreffion
from my fubjecl:, I hope it may eafily be ex-
cufed : for who can (peak of Ifaiah with-
out a Digreffion, when men choofe the food
of Swine, and trample upon Pearls, as things
of no value, as if he and the other Prophets
had always the hard fate tQ preach to the
Rulers of Sodom, and the People, of Gomor-
rha.
But if the ftyle of the Scriptures be not in
all places alike, excellent and exadt, let it be
confidered, that
1. The
of the Chriftian Religion. 93
1. The fame (tile is not fuitable to all fub-
je&s, and the ftile and dialed is different, ac-
cording to the difference of the matter, or of
the perfons, for whofe ufe it was immediate-
ly defigned. What concerns the Ajjyrian
Monarchy in the Prophet Daniel, is in .the
Chaldee Tongue , and what relates dire&ly to
the Jews is in the Hebrew. Part of Ezra is in
Chaldee, being a relation of Matter of Fact
contained in the Chaldee Chronicles 5 and
Jer. 10. n.'isin the fame Tongue, that the
Jews might reject the Idolatry of the Chalde-
ans in their Language, and openly profefs
their own abhorrence of it. And as upon
thefe occafions the Language of Scripture is
changed, with refpect to the fubjv. J: a^d the
perfons concerned, fo the .ftyle muft be fome-
times altered upon the fame account.
2. Artificial {trains of Rhetorick, whereby
the paffions are moved to the utmoft heighth,
were very neceffary to gain a prefent point,
arid carrry a Caufe by a violent and fudden
tranfport, before Pveafon could interpofe. But
Religion being to be propounded upon rea-
fonable motives, there could be no need of
Rhetorick, when the evidence of thofe Mira-
cles by which it was eftablifhed, afforded fo
many other more certain and powerful means
of perfwafion. The Scriptures are not written
in the enticing words of mans wifdom, but in
truth and fimplicity, and therefore might well
. have been without any advantages of Elo-
quence,
?4 The Reafonabknefs andtertainty
qucnce, as needing no fuch helps to recom.
mend them to ferious and impartial Mind9 :
And tho Gpd has been pleafed to condefcend
fo far to the infirmities of men, as to convey
very much of his Revealed Will to us, in
♦ fuch a ftyle, as for its own fake is highly to
be efteemed and admired. Yet it was fit that
other parts of the Scriptures (hould have the
bare force and evidence of truth only, to
convince men, that it might appear that our
Religion was propagated not *by any Arts
of humane Eloquence, but by its own Worth
and Excellency : For Eloquence was not ufed,
where it would have been mod neceffary, if
any humane means could be fo, in aflerting
and propagating the Divine Truth. In the
propagation of the Gofpel all the Eloquence,
as well as the Power, and Prejudices, and
Vices of Mankind were combined againft it,
and yet lefs elegancy and accuracy of ftyle
was employed by the Apoftles and Evangel ifts,
than had been before ufed by Mofes and tha
Prophets, who yet had nothing which feemed
fo ftrange and wonderful to deliver. Which
is one great argument of the Power and Effi-
cacy of the Gofpel, that it could prevail fo
much againft all' the oppofition in the world,
only by telling a plain Truth, and in the plain-
eft manner. For where the thing is evident,
the feweft and plaineft words areneft, as in
Mathematical Demonftrations, it is enough. if
men make themfelves to be underftood : this
like wife
of the Cbriftian Religion. ^5
likewife was all that the ih h y\&tfv Uttntvofnt
Apoftles aimed at , their 7» >«pw *6* « z»Tv&f jnXt
Caufe and Do&rine was fo ^"f/**™ **'* *) ™&**U™i$
certain and demonftra.ble, ^^T^I^^ 7"
that any words, winch did w* ^^ ^^
but fully and clearly ex- sT4 ^tw , $TI 'mx^Vt
prefs their meaning, were Euftb.Hift.lib.iii.c.*4. .
fufficient for their purpofe } their Rhetorick
lay in the things themfelves, not in words :
there is no great Art required to prove that to
any man, which he fees with his eyes, and •
therefore as the power of Miracles was greater
under the Gofpel, than under the Law, fo
there was lefs need of Eloquence in the New
Teftament than in the Old. Tet it cannot be
denied, as a f Learned Critick has*declared ,+ Mer.
that St Paul infome l(ind and upon Jome fubjetts Entluf. c.
is as eloquent as ever man was 5 not inferiour to 4-
Demofthenes ( in whofe writings he believes
that Apoftle had been much converfant ) or
^Efchines, or any other anciently tnofi admired.
3. It is reafonable to believe, that the Scri-
ptures may be written in the Words and
Phrafes of the Penmen of the feveral parts ©f
them, and that ttie Holy Ghoft might permit
them to ule their own ftyle, fo dire&ing them
(till, and over-ruling them in every word and
fentence, that it mould infallibly exprefs his
own lull fenfe and meaning, and fpeak the
Truth, which he infpired. And. therefore
tho there be divers ftyles in the Scriptures, yet
. this is no prejudice to the Authority and Cer-
tainty
$6 The Reafonab/enefs and Certainty
' tainty of them. Ifaiah, for inftance, being of
the Blood Royal, and educated at Court,
may write in a mpre refined and lofty ftyle $
and Amos, who was brought up among the
Herdfmen of Tekoa, may fpeak in a more hum-
ble ftrain, and fetch his Metaphors from
lower and meaner things, and yet the fenfe
and fubftance of both may be from the Holy
Ghoft, and as exactly true and infallible, as
if every word and fyllable were dictated by
him. But this has been already confidered'
under its proper head.
- 1 C H A P. IV.
Of the Canon of the Holy Scriptures.
WHatever uncertainty there can be fup-
pofed to be, concerning the Canon
of the Holy Scriptures, or the Catalogue and
Number of Books of Divine Revelation, this
ought to be made no objection againft the
certainty of Divine Revelation* itfelf, or a-
gainft the' authority of thofe Books of Scri-
pture, which are univerfally acknowledged
and received by all Churches. For if this be
a true way of arguing, then whatever we are
ignorant of, muft be an argument againft the
certainty of what we know 5 and by confe-
quence no man can be certain of any thing,
fince the wifeft man is ignorant of fo many
things,
of the Cbrifiian Religion.
things, that he knows very little in compari-
fon of what he is ignorant of. And as to
the matter in hand, there is fcarce any Au-
thor of great note and fame, but that Cfi^
ticks have had Difputes concerning the num-
ber of his genuine Works ^ and yet this has
. never- been thought any prejudice to fuch as
are allowed by all to be genuine. Would not
that man make himfelf ridiculous, who mould
reject the Philippicks of Tullypt Virgil's JEneit2
as fpurious, becaufe other Books, either doubt*
ful, or counterfeit, have paft under the names
of thefe two Authors ? If fome Books have
been difputed, the reft certainly are genuine
beyond all difpute, becaufe they have never"
been called into queftion or doubt.
Now if thefe Books only were of Divine
Revelation, concerning which there has never
been any Difpute, they contain all things necef-
fary to be believed and pra&ifed -0 and as to
the reft, concerning which there has been any
,controverfy, tho they be exceeding ufeful to
explain divers things, wbich wc find in thefe ,
and perhaps to teach us fome things ( not ef-
fential to our Religion, nor necelfary to Salta-*
tjon)which are not to be found elfewhere : yet
they are not abfolutely neceffary to be received,
becaufe whatever Doctrines are abfolutely
neceflary^they are to be found fully and plainly
delivered in thofe Books of Scripture, which
have ever been received without contradiction1
or difpute. Marty men were undoubtedly
^8 The Reafo?iab/e?w[s and Certainty
fa ved, before the writing of thefe controvert- *
ed Books, nay, before the writing of any
Books at all 5 Writings being no further necef-
lary, than as they are neceflary to convey ' the
knowledge of what is written , when the
things now written could be as well known
without writing, Books were not neceflary :
and tho for after ages it became neceflary,
that the Prophets and Apoftles and Evange-
lifts mould conflgn their Do&rine to writing,
yet no more of their writings can be abfolute-
ly neceflary to be known by us, than what
may be iufficient to inftruft us in the ways of
iaivation. It is the infinite Goodnefs and
Mercy of God to afford us more than is abfo-
lutely neceflary for our fpiritual and eternal
Life, as lie has done for our Natural, and it
is a great (in in any man to reject any means of
Salvation or Inftru&ion, which God has been
pleafed to allow : but (fill that man would
iuftain his Natural Life and Health, who
fhould think all, that is not neceflary to the
fupport of it, common or unclean^ and not fit*
to be ufed forfood.And if a man without any
of his own fault or negleft (hould come to the
knowledge only of the uncontrroverted Books,
he would find them abundantly fufficient to
anfwer all the ends of Revelation, and to
procure his Salvation. It cannot be denied
but that one infallible Authority is as great
a Security, as never fo many could be : but
the fame Doctrines are taught in feveral places
of
of the Chriftian Religion, '
of Scripture, and we ought to be thankful
to God for it, that he has been pleafed to
furnifh us with fo much more than is abfo-
lutely neceflary, and to repeat the fame things
in fundry places and in divers manners, for
. our further inftruftion and confirmation in the
Faith : tho it would be abfurd and wicked to
fay, that he who believes all the points of
neceflary Faith, upon the' authority of any
one Book of Scripture, has no fufficient means
of Salvation, unlefs he likewife believe them
upon the Authority of all the reft.
Not that I fuppofe any wife and good man
can now find any caufe to doubt of any Book
in the Old or New Teftament, whether it be
genuine or no 5 but to fuppofe the moft and
the worft that can be fuppofed, if thofe Books
which at any time have been called in quefti-
on, were not only dubious, but certainly fpu-
rious, the remaining Books, which were never
doubted of, are fufficient for all the' neceflary
ends and purpofes of a Revelation : and there-
fore this ought to be no obje&ion againft the
Authority of the Scriptures, that the Autho-
rity of fome Books has been formerly matter
of controverfy.
I (liall enter upon no difcourfe concerning
the Apocryphal Books, the authority where-
of has been fo often and fo effectually dis-
proved by Proteftants, that the mod learned
Vapifts have now little to fay for them, but
are forced only to fly to the authority of their
H a Church,
ico,* The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
Church, which is in efFecl: to beg the thing
in queftion, or to beg fomcthing as hard to be
granted, viz. the infallibility of the Church
of Rome. But I (hall here engage in no con-
troverfy of that nature. Both Proteftants
and Papifts are, generally fpeaking, agreed, .
that the Books of Mofes and the Prophets in
the Old Teftament, and the Writings of the
Evangel ifts and the Apoftles in theNew are of
Divine Authority $ and if this be fo, the
Chriftian Religion mud be true, whether there
be, or be not others of the fame nature,and of
equal authority. Thefe Books in the main
have already been proved to be genuine, and
without any material corruption or alteration.
I ("hall now only propofe fuch general conii-
derations, as may be fufficient to obviate ob-
jections.
The agreement between the Jews and &*-
war i tans in the Pentateuch is a clear evidence
for its Authority. And tho there were many
and great Idolatries committed in the King-
dom of Jt/duby yet by the good providence of
God there never was fuch a total Apoftacy in
the people, nor fo long a fucceffion of Idola-
trous Kings, as that the Books, either of the
Law or the Prophets, can be fuppofed to have
been tuppreft or altered. For three years un-
der Rchoboam, they walked in the way of David
and Solomon, i Chron. n. 17. 12. I. andtho
afterwards he forfook the Law of the Lord, and
alllfrael ny>/;fe/,hisjiieign was in all but feven-
teen
of the Cbriftian Religion. i o I
teen years. Abijam was a wicked King, but
he reigned no longer than three years ,
i Kings xv. 2* Afa the third from Solomon,
and Jehojhaphat his Son, were great Reformers^
and Aft reigned one and forty years, and Je-
kofiaphat five and twenty years, 2 Chron. xvi.
13. xx. 31. The two next Rings in fucctfii-
on did evil in the fight of the Lord, but their
Reigns were fliort, Jehoram reigned eight
years, and Ahaziahbut one, 2 Chron. xxi, 20.
xxii. 2. During the interval of fix years un-
der the ufurpation of Athaliah, the people
could not be greatly corrupted : for fhe was
hateful to them, as Jehorant her hubband had
been before her, and they readily joyned with
Jehoiada in flaying her, and in reftoring the
worftiip of God, 2 Chron. xxii. JoaJJj the Con
of Ahaziah did that which was right in the fight
of the Lord all the days of Jehoiada,, 2 Chron*
xxiv. 2. We are fure that he reigned well
three and twenty years, 2 Kings xii. 61 and
probably much longer, for Jehoiada lived to a
very great age, 2 C/jron. xxiv. 15. Amaziah
his fon has the fame character, and with the
fame abatement, thaf he did that which was
right in the fight of the Lord, but not with a per-
feci heart, 2 Chron. xxv. 2 . or yet not like David
his Father : he did according to all things as
Joafl) hh Father did, 7 Rings xiv. 3. IJzziah
ion to Amaziah reigned well, and fought God
in the days of Zichariah, 2 Chron. xxvj. 5.
and after he was feized with the Leprofie for
H 3 in-
102 The Reafonable?iefs and Certainty
invading the Priefts office, the adminiftration
of affairs was in the hands of his Son *jothamy
verf. 2 1 , who imitated the good part of his,
fathers Reign, Chap, xxvii. 2. Jhaz was
wicked and an Idolater, but he reigned only
fixteen years,Chap. xxviii. 1. and his fon He^
%ekkh wrought a great Reformation, who
reigned twenty nine years, Chap.xxix. 1. Ma-
vaffcs was much given to Idolatry in the for-
tner part of his Reign, but after his captivity
in Babylon he was very* zealous againft it.
Chap, xxxiii. \% 16, Amon imitated the ill
part of his Father's Reign, but his own con-
tinued no longer than two years, Chap.xxxiii,
21. The next was Jofiah, in whofe time the
Book of the Law was found in the .Temple,
which muft be the Book of Mofe/s own
band-writing $ for it is evident, that a Book
of the Law could be no fuch rare thing at that
time in Jerufalemr as to be taken fo much no-
tice of, unlefs it had been that Book, which
was laid up in the fide of the Ark, and was,
to be franfcribed by every King. It feems,
that Book of theLaw had been-purpofely hid,
to preferve it from the attempts of Idolaters,
who it was feared might have a defign to de~
ilroy it : for if it had only lain by neglected,
the rinding of it could have been no fuch fur-
prizing thing, becaufe the place in the Temple
was well known, where it was wont to be
kept in the fide of the Ark, and where they
might have fought for it : but it was proba-
bly
of the Chriflian Religion. (03
Wy at that time fuppofed to have been utterly
loft, and its being found in the Ruines of the
Temple, which was built for the obfervation
of it, and where it ought to have been kept
with the greateft care, as a moft inestimable
treafure 5 the veneration which Jofiak had for
fo facred a Writing, and the happy and un-
expei&ed recovery of it, when it had been dis-
regarded and almoft loft, through the iniqui-
ty of his PredecefTors ^ thefe considerations
coul4 not but exceedingly move , a mind fo
tender and affectionately pious as that Kings,
when he received the Law under Mofe/sown.
hand, fent him, as he believed by God him-
felf, and delivered to him, as it were , anew
from Heaven. Not long after his time was
the Captivity in Babylon ^ till wlpch there
were always Prophets , frequent Reformati-
ons, and never any fucceflion of Idolatrous
Kings, which continued for a long time toge-
ther $ very few Kings were Idolatrous through-
out their whole Reigns, and thofe that were,
reigned but a (hort time.
* It has been proved, that the Pentateuch *Book ,
and the Books of the Prophets, written before Pan 2. c
the Captivity were preferved amongft the Jews6, & 9'
till their return, and it is acknowledge by
thofe. who are of another opinion, that Ezra,
who compofed the Canon, did it by a Pro-
phetick fpirit, or had the adiftance of Pro-
phets in the doing it. * Jofcphus fays, that*Jofeph.
their Books after the time of Artaxerxes are c.ont- ,A~
T, pton. lib.
H 4 not!.
%$$ The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
not of equal authority with thofe before his
rime, for want of a certain fucceffion of Pro-
phets. And fince the Jews admitted no wri-
tings as infpired, into the Canon after Mala-
fki$ Prophecy, this (hews their fincerity and
exa&nefs in examining the truth and authori-
ty of fuch Writings, as they admitted into
. their Canon of Scripture. The Pharifees made
the commandment of God of no effetf by their
Traditions, but never«durft prefume to impofe
them under the notion and character of a
Book of the Scriptures. The modern Jews in
like manner never dared to pretend to new
Books of Revelation, but have conftantly ad-
hered to the old.
And what inducement could the Jews have^
to receive thefe Books inco their Canon, of
which it confifts, rather than the Apocryphal
Books, but the evidence of their Divine Au-
thority > which is a thing more efpecially re-
markable in fome Books. Why Qiould they
receive certain Books under the Names of So-
lomon, Efiher, Daniel and Ezra, but not ad-
mit into the Canon others going under the
fame names, but becaufe of the difference in
their Authority ? Why mould they receive
the Books of thofe whom their fore- fathers
had flain, and thofe very Books for which
they flew them, but upon the clcareft evi-
dence ? It is certain they could be polled with
no prejudice in their favour, but with very
many a gain ft the Books of fuch Authors. To
give another imtance : The Book of Rath con-
tains
of the Chriftian Religion. 105
. tains the affairs and tranfoctions of a
particular Family, of no great confequence,
as one might imagine at firft view, and
yet it has been prefer ved with as much care,
and as conftantly received as the reft. There
is little reafon, upon human considerations,
why a relation concerning that Family mould
be inferted into the Canon of Scripture, ra-
ther than one concerning any other But the
lineage of .the Meffias is fet forth in it, and
that was a fufficient reafon why it (hould be
infeited$ and therefore by the Divine Wif-
dom and Providence, neither the emulation
and envy of other Families, nor any other
caufe or accident hindred its reception and
prefervation amongft the other infpired Books.
And in that Hiftory there is an account not
very honourable for David's Family, in de-
riving his defcent from Pkares of 7/w/wr, and
(hewing that his Great Grandmother was a
Moabitefs 5 the Moabites being' a people, who
• had an indelible mark of infamy fixe upon
them by the Law of Alofes, Deutr. xxiii. 3.
• II. As the Pentateuch was ever acknowledg-
ed by the People of Ifrael after their feparatibn
from the Tribe Jitdab -0 fo if they rejected
the writings ot the Prophets, it muft have been
becaufe all or moft of them were writ-
ten by Prophets , who were of the two
Tribes, and all the Prophets of Ifrael own-
ing the Temple of ferkfakm to be the true
place of V/orfhip, the Ifradites and Samaritans
muft have great prejudices againft them upon
rh.it
io6 The Reafonakknefs and Certainty
that account, and it cannot be expected, thafc
they (hould -receive the Books of any of the
Prophets in the fame manner as they did thofe
of Mofes. The Books of Samuel^ David and
Solomon had lefs regard paid to them upon
Reafons of State by the Tribes, who followed
• Antiqu. the Revolt of Jeroboam : yet when * Jofeph
Ecd. E-Scaliger fent to the Samaritans for the CJanti-
pift- »• cles of the Book of Pfalms in their Language ^
as well as for the Book of the Law and oijojlma,
they promifed to fend him them. And it is pro v-
TM^ud8" ec* ^u^c^ently DV Dr t Lightfooty that negher
exercir. ' the Samaritans, nor the Sadduetes rejected the
dnjoh.iv. Books of the old Teftament, tho they did
not admit the reft into the fame veneration
and authority with the Books of Mofes, nor
read them in their Synagogues. This is alfo
* Crir. proved by F. Simon * both of the Sadducees
lib i c' and the 2Gr*i, and f Morinus likewife proves
1 6. &29. it of the Kar<ei, who are generally taken for
Difquifit. Sadducees t F. Simon maintains the contrary,
t Epifi.70. and that they have wrong done them in being .
inrer An- charged with the opinions of the Sadducees :
icKieat.0 However, this is not material to our prefent
purpofe,lince he (hews that both the Sadducees
and the Kar.-ei, or Cavaites, and all the Jews
befides received the entire Volume of theScnp-
de>Sn-t tures wfehpHt My contradiction* Hackfpan like-
manno. wife has (hewed that the Sadducees denied not
the Authority of the Books of. the Prophets.
'Ill Concerning the Books, whereof we
we find mention, made in the Old Teftament,
either
of the Cbriftian Religion. 107
either 1. They are not different from thofe,
which are now in the Canon, bat the fame
Books under divers Names. Or 2. They were
not written by Infpiration, tho written by
Prophets. For we are not to fuppofe, that the
Prophets were infpired in every thing, that
they wrote, any more than in all theyfpoke.
And this (hews the care and integrity of the
Jews in compiling their Canon , that they
would not take into it all fhe Writings eyen
of the Prophets themfelves, but only fuch
as they knew to be written by them,
as, Prophets, that is, by Infpiration, the
Prophets themfelves no doubt making a di-
ftin&ion (as we find St Paul did J between
what they had written by the Spirit of God,
and that in which they had not his immediate
and extraordinary direction, and infallible af-
fiftance. Or 3. They might not be written
by Prophets. For the office of Recorder, or
Remembrancer, or Writer of Chronicles fas
it is explained in the Margin) is mentioned as
an office of great Honour and Truft, and was
diftind from that of the Prophets, 2 Sam. viii.
16.2 Kings xviii. 18. iChron. xxxiv. 8. Ifaiah
xxxvi. 3, 22.Be(ides,. the Hebrews called every
fmall Writing a Book : Thus Dent. xxiv. i.
that which we render a Bill of Divorcement
is in the Original a Book of Divorcement, the
word being the fame, which, Jofh. x. 13. and
2 Sam. i. 18. is tranflated the Book of Jajhet,
So Matt, xix, 7. and M.iyI\ x. 4. it is in the
Grccl%
io8 The Reufottiblenefs and Certainty
Greek a Book of Divorcement, the word is the
fame which the Septuagint had ufed ^ it indeed
may fignifie a little Book, but it often fignifies
a Book, without that diftinttion, and fo it is
rendered i Tim-iv. 15. David's Letter to foab
is a Book, in the Hebrew and in the Greek, 2 Sam.
xi. 14, 15. and Lettets are ftiled Books by
rbHr°c' * Herodotus. Or 4, Tho it mould be granted
ti^Sciib. that fome Books, which were written by In-
tf.c.4. fpiration, are now loft, it is no abfurdity to
fuppofe that God mould fuffer Writings to be
loft, thro the fault and negligence of men,
which were dictated by his Spirit. Several
things might by the Prophets be delivered by
Revelation to the perfons whcftri they con-
cerned, which were never committed to wri-
ting ^ <and others, which were written, but
which were not neceffary to the ends of
Revelation in general , but rather concern-
ed particular times and places , and the
fubftance whereof, as far as the world in ge-
neral is concerned, is to be found in the other
Scriptures, might by the carelefnefs of men
never come to the fight and knowledge of
Pofterity.
And here I mail obferve, that the Books of
Prophecy have always the Names of the Au-
thors expreft, and commonly they are often
repeated in the Books themfelves, but in the
Hiftorical Books there was not the fame rea-
fon for it -0 becaufe in matters of faft, which
are paft, an Author may eafily be difproved,
if
cf the Chriftian Religion. i op
if he relates what is falfe of his owh times, or
of times whereof there are memorials ftill ex-
tant. But the Credit of Prophecies concern-
ing things to come, a long time after, topafs,
muft depend upon .the Million and Authority
of the Prophet only, and therefore it was ne-
cefTary that the Names of the Prophets mould
be annext, that their Predictions might be de-
pended upon, when tfyey were known to be
delivered by men, who by other Predictions
already fulfilled, had proved themfelves to be
true Prophets.
IV. The very prefer vation of Books of fo
great Antiquity, thro fo many changes and
revolutions, againft all the injuries of Time
and Ignorance, againfr. the violence of War
and the malice of Adverfaries, and fo many
other Accidents, which have deftroyed moft
other Books of any considerable Antiquity, is
a certain indication of a wonderful Providence
concerned for them, and of that evidence
whereby they were at firft attefted. The Laws
of the wifeft Law-givers of the mod flourifh-
ing and powerful Nations have been fo ' little
regarded by the people to whom they were
given, that they foon forfook the practice of
them, and readily delivered up themfelves to
be governed by other Laws, upon any Revo-
lution 5 and all the pretences to Revelation,
which moll: of the Ancient Law- givers afTumed
to themfelves, could make them no longer ad-
hered to, nor fo much valued, as to outlive
the
1 1 o The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
the fare of the particular Kingdoms and States
for which they were contrived : but moft of
them were changed or laid afide before, and
the reft given up and abandoned, as out of
date, and of little ufeor^efteem afterwards,
and all of them were fo' little able to with-
stand the deftruction of time, that we know
not much more of them, than that the beft
* and moft ancient* were in great meafure taken
out of the Laws of Mofes. But the Books of
Mofis and the Prophets have continued entire
and unchanged under all accidents and revo-
lutions of affairs, bearing this chara&er as
well as others of him, who is immutable $
they have been ftill aflerted againft all the
malice and oppofition of Enemies by a capti-
ved and difperfed people, who by the fignal
providence of God, tho they rejecl: their Mef-
fas, yet ftill acknowledge thofe proprieties,
which foretold his coming,and after their dif-
periion for fo many hundred years, are fo far
from renouncing them, that they alfert and
maintain them, and are zealous even to fuper-
ltition, for thole Books, which command that
worftiip, and appoint thofe Solemnities, which
they have fo long been out of all poflibility
to obferve, as if thofe Laws, which were once
fo uneafy to their Fore- fathers, were now be-
come natural to their Pofterity, or rather be-
caufc they were revealed by him, whofe
word (hall never pafs away till all be ful-
filled.
V. The
of the Cbriftian Religion. 1 1 1
V. The New Teftament gives evidence
and confirmation to the Books of the Old,
which are fo often cited in it.
Vf. The Chriftians were religioufly cauti-
ous and cireumfpect in admitting Books into
the Canon of the New Teftament. The f
* Epiftle to the Hebrews, and the fecond Epi- cSSg?-
ftle of St Peter, were at firft fcrupled only, or Ecci.
chiefly upon the account of the ftyle 5 the Script*
ftyle of the former being thought different
from that of St Paul , and the Style of the
latter from that of St Peter. The Epiftle of
St Jude was likewife doubted of for this rea-
fon, becaufe the Apocryphal Book of Enoch
is cited in it. Writings, which 'went under
the names of feveral of the Apoftles were re-
jected, and by general confent laid afide. The
genuine .Epiftle of St Barnabas, who is ftiled
an Apoftle, AcJs xiii. 2. xiv. 14. was never
received but as Apocryphal 5 and the Firft
Epiftle of St Clement, of whom St Paul gives
as high a character, Phil. iv. 3. as he doth
of St Luke, or as St Peter ever gave of St Mark,
was never admitted among the Canonical
Books, tho it was wont to be read in Churches.
But the Gofgel according to St Marl{, and the
Gofpel" and Acts of the Apoftles written by St
Luke, have ever been received for canonical.
For which no reafon can be given, but that
St Mark and St Luke were known to have
written by infpiration , fince upon all per-
fonal and humane Accounts, an Epiftle of St
Bar-
112 The Keafonablenefs and Cettainty
Barnabas or St Clement, mull: have carried as
much Authority with it, as any thing under
t Unam the name of St Mark, or St Luke, f St Jeront
ad sedifi- favSj t[]at gt Barnabas was the Author of one
Ecciefis Epiftle written tor the edification of the
pertinen- Church, which is read among the Apocryphal
ftohm Pi" Books -j fo that Books were ftyled Apocryphal,
compofu- not becaufe it was uncertain who were the
interU*A- Authors of them, but becaufe it was doubtful
poduy- whether they were written by infpiration or
^urask-" no* ^° care^ was tne Primitive. Church to
gitur.id.ib receive none into the Canon, but Books cer-
tainly infpired.
"cyit.iufl. it js wcjj ohferved * by F. Simon, to this
T.Part. i. purpefe, that if ire compare the G of pels and the
other Books of the New TejJamcnt with the Li'
turgtes , that we have under the names of feve-
r.'.l Apo{ilcsylo whom the mojl part ofthcEajlern
Chrijiians do attribute them, we full be con-
vinced that the Go I pels are truly the Apojlles*
lor all I he Churches have preferved them in their
Ancient Purity ^ whereas every particular Nati-
on hath added to their Liturgies, and hath ta-
ken the liberty often to revife them. The refpecJ
that hath been always had to the Writings of the
New Teflament, without inferting tiny confidera-
ble additions therein, is a?i evident proof that
all people have looked upon them as Divine
Booh, which it is not lawful for any to alter.
On the contrary, they have been perfwaded, that
the Liturgies, tho they bear the Names of the
Apojlles, or of fome Difciples of Jefus Chrijl,
were
C. I
Of the Chrijiian Religion. I i |
were not originally written by then/, to whom
they were attributed. And therefore it hath been
left free to the Churches to add to them, or to
diminifi from them, according as occafion re-
quires.
VII. As the Primitive Chriftianswere very
jealous and cautious in admitting Bocks into
the Canon, fo they had futHcient means and
opportunities to examine and diftinguith the'
genuine and infpired Writings from the Apd-
cryphal or fpurious. The way of Writing,
and the hands of the Apoftles were well knowri
to thofe to whom they wrote, as St Paul in-
timates of his own hand and manner of Salu-
tation ; for when he ufed an Amanuenfis, yet
he wrote the Salutation with his own Hand, as
his token in every Epifllc, i Theff. iii. 17. They
generally wrote to whole Churches, but par-
ticular men are frequently named in their E-
piftles, which was a great means to afeertaiti
the Authority of them. ;
%7ertullian appeals to Au- ^L^rc^V3°R^
ri mei.us exercere 1:1 nsgotio falur §
thentick Books or the very ft*, percurre Eccfefes Apnftoh-
Hand-writin^s of the Apo- f*> l^J™ ip& ■•**« C* he--
/L, « r P „ *. drX Apoitolorum iuis locis ureli-
ltleS themielveS. For thO denrur, apud qua/; ipfa Autbf-nti-
it'be acknowledged, that c« JLiter^ eomm redtancur. tW-
the word Authtnticus doth J
not always denote the Original Writing utf.
der the Authors own Hand, but fometimes
only the Original Language 5 yet the words
oiTertidlian are exprels, that the Original E«
piftles were in his times frill extant : for which?
i &
1 1 4 The Reafonab/e?iefs and Certainty
Pveafon he refers the Hereticks to the Apofto-
lical ChurcheSjWhere they were read, viz. to
f be Church of Corinth, of Phillippi, Theffalo-
vica, Ephejus, and Rome 5 but the Epiftles of
the Apoftles were read in -Greek, without
doubt, in other Churches befides thefe, and
the Reafon why he refers them to the Apofto-
lical Churches rather than to any other, muft
be becaufe the Originals under St Paul's own
Hands were there ftill to be feen, and he men-
tEufeb t*ons t^iat t^ie thrones or Seats of the Apoftles
Hin.cjib. were then alfo preferved, as f Eufebius fays,
^"•cip. that of St James was preferved to his time.
Apoi. 2. Jujiin * Martyr afcribes the Gofpels to the
Apoftles, he tranferibes the Chriftian Do&rine
at large out of them, and declares that they
were read in * the Chriftian Aflemblies every
j Sunday, f Stlreneus,a Difciple of StPoly carp, who
lib. "c.*. was made by Biftiop St John, gives a particular
account of the Writings of the Four Evange-
lifts, and fays there were Four Gofpels and no
more, and that thefe were written by St Mat-
there, and St Mark* and St Luke, and St John.
* Tertuii. * Tcrtullian undertook the Defence of the Four
adv. Mar- Gofpels againft Marcion. And thefe Fathers
Jrb' frequently quote thefe and the other Writings
of the Apoftles ^ fo do likewife Clemens Roma-
nus and Ignatius, who lived and converfed with
the Apoftles themfelves. But in ourDifputes
with Infidels particular regard is to be had to
the Hiftory of the Gofpel, for our Proof
againft them depends upon matter of Fac~h
Both
IV. G- 2,
of the Chriftian Religion, t i$
Both * Grotius and F. Simon have proved that ^tror'F
the Gofpel .written in Hebrew by St Matthew S\m. crit.
was prefer ved to the time of St Jerom and Epi- &ft- m thi
phamm, and that tho the Nazarens had made **' 'c'7' '
fome additions ro it, yet they had made no
Alterations hi the Original Text. F. Simon
moreover fays, that the Gofpel of St Matthew
had been rranflated undoubtedly out of He*
brew into Greek, 'before the Nazarens had in-
ferred their Additions, thefe being to be found
in no Greek Copy. The Ebionites hzd corrupt-
ed the Hebrew Copy, which they ufed, and
had left out what they pleafed^ but the Copy
of the Nazarens, Epiphani- ■
us f fays was more entire, I. ■*"' * T\KetT* >****«*'
only he is not certain whe- •"*?£" Tfc ?- - B**F"
ther they retained the Ge- iUr&<iyeiwM&iM<yeh--
nealogy of Chrift ^ but it ^iv In <r»£«w «* 0U* n r\
is moil: probable in F. Si- $t** ywi*K<>yia.« tb\ &» w
mons judgment, that they A%**V "X^ X&s* *g<y«Aoy.
did retain it, tho the Ebi- Epiphan. Hzref. *9. Num. 9„
onites omitted it. So that tho there were
fome Additions made by the Nazarens; yet as
far as the proof of our Religion againft Infi-
dels is concerned, the Hebrew Gofpel, in its'
Original Hebrew, as it was written by St Mat-
thew, remained exactly perfect for divers ages.
Till the Seel: of the Nazarens ceafing, and the
Hebrew Tongue growing out of ufe, the Greek
3'ranflation only was preferved. This Tran-
ation of St Matthew's Gofpel is afcribed to
one of the Apoftles or Evangelifts, tho it be
I 2 not
111. c
M6 1 be R eafonablenefs and Certainty
Eufeb. not certain to whom of them it belongs. *Pa-
pias {peaks of the times before there was any
Authentick Verfion, when he fays that every
one translated it, as he could, for his own
ufe. It appears from him however, that
mere were Greek Verfions of the Gofpel of
St Matthew made immediately upon its firft
publication 5 and from hence we may be af-
' f u red that St John reviled and approved the
prefent Verfion ( which is by fbme attributed
to him) by whomfoever it was made at firft.
For this Gofpel in the Greek, Tongue being
moft in ufe, and thereby preferved, when the
Original Hebrew has been fo long ago lolt, it
is not to be fuppofed that St John mould have
no regard to it in that Review which he took
of the other Gofpels, that were written ori-
t jjwt-, ginally in Greek, We read in f Photitss, that
" 1Vhe revifed the Gofpels which were brought to
him written in divers Languages, the Verfi-
ons as well as the Originals, and therefore
this of St Mm thews Gofpel cannot be fuppofed
to have been omitted.
One of the Miraculous Gifts was that of
Discerning of Spirits, whereby perfons endued
with it were enabled to diftinguifh true Reve-
lations from Impoftures, 1 Cor. xii. 10. And
St John wrote his Gofpel and his Epiftles to
confute thofe Hereticks, who were the chief
Forgers of counterfeit Books of Scripture, or
the moft notorious corrupters of the true
Books : and his Life was by the Providence of
Cod
of the Chriflian Religion. 1 1 7
God prolonged, that he might be able both
to vindicate and perfect the Canon of Scri-
pture. We find that f he difcovered an Impo- Q^ria
fture, which was framed concerning St Paul, sc Luc
and * that he read and ap-
proved the Gofpels which * ?w *&"*y&yffl»>™»'*»;
had been written before his A^7l\ ^'J2
own b and there is no rea- yh ^^ j^j *vw« fc».
Ion tO doubt, but he had ^v^trarm. Hufeb. HiftliWii.
feen all the other Writings c. =4. quod quum >giffet
nf fhe New Trftamenf «3nd Matt,ia:i» -Marci, & Lues vo!u-
01 me i\iew ieirament,ana min3) probaverir quidem Texru.n
10 fimined the Canon or Hiftoriar, & vera eos dixifTe fir-
Scripture hilTlfelf. And the maveritHieron.Cstal.inSr. Joan.
Scriptures of the New Teftament were read in
the Churches* and Aftemblies of Chriftians
from the beginning, as thofe of the Old Te-
ftament had been in the Synagogues of the
Jews, by which means they became fO di-
vulged and published, that they could be nei-
ther loft nor falfifled.
VIII. The Books of the New Teftament
were acknowledged to be genuine by the Ad-
verfaries of the Chriftian Religion. To fay
nothing of St Paul's Epiftles, which he ircr
quently quotes, the Gofpels were allowed by
Julian * the Apoftate to belong to the Au- * cyriii.
thors , whofe names rhey bear. f Trjp/jo Ahx-
owns he had read the Gofpels, and makes no^"
queftion or fcru pies about the Authors. Ce/-tJ«ti
fits quotes the Scriptures frequently, and H?c~ ^1art' Dl"
rocks, (as * La3a?itius, who had heard him* Laftanr.
difcourfe, fays ) was as converfant in them, as f.I?,1,tur-
J ■/ ■ . ., lib. v. c
J 3 if*,*.
1 1 8 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
if he had once been a Chriftian, yet neither of
them moved any difpute, concerning the Au-
thors of the Books of the Scriptures, but in
referring to them upon all occafions, mewed
that they had nothing to object on that Head,
t °r'g- And when f Celjus fays, that lbme of the
lib.*!* Chriftians made alterations in the Cofpels, this
is a confeflion that fome only did it, and Ori-
gen (hews that they were Hereticks, viz,, the
Marcionijis and Valentinians, and perhaps the
Difciples of Luc amis or Lucianus, for in this
he could not be pofitive,tho this Lucanus was
a follower of Marriott,
IX. There are (fill extant Copies of great
Antiquity. The Cambridge topy in Gree^
and Latin, containing the four Gofpels, and
the Acts of the Apoftles $ and that which is
*F. Si- fuppofed to-be the fecond part of it, contain-
j£j?«f£te.ing!St Paul's Epiftles, in the French Kings Li-
X-Tejt- brary, and another the like Copy, which is
frJVfcbii:*n ^ie Library of th Benedictines of St Gcr- '
deRe Di- mains * are concluded to be a thoufand years
? TabeU °^ at *ea^ : ^'Tlorimis thought them to be an-
1. cienter than St Jeroms time. The AlexmUri-
tEpift. an Copy is believed to have been written by
Knu&ti. • TJbecla\ above one thoufand three hundred
Ecci. Q- years ago- Morinus f acknowledgeth it to be
r'prokH of -above twelve hundred years date. Bifhop
£om. ix. "A' Walton ftippofes the Alexandrian MS. to be
2t-c?« 3t *eaft as old as that in the Vatican, which is
crit, /#/?. allowed to be twelve hundred years old.
; *| There is f 01a k MS. of the Gofpels in
the
r
of the Chrifiian Religion. up
the Library of the Duke of Florence^ of above
a thoufand years Antiquity, and another not
much lefs ancient. A * Gothick Tranflation* Gruter.
of the Four Evangelifts in the Abbey of^jf'
Werdin, is likewife of above a thoufand years
Antiquity. And what ancient Books are there,
of which the Originals are frill extant } or of
which there are fo ancient Copies, as of the
Scriptures ?
X. Sufficient reafonsmay be given, to (hew
how it came to pafs, that the Authority of
fome Books was at firft. doubted of.
i. TheEpiftle to the Hebrews had no name
prefixt, (either becaufe the Jews were preju-
diced againft St Paul, or becaufe the GentiUs
were his more peculiar care, or for fome other
reafon unknown) and in this it differs from
the reft of St Paul's Epiftles, and the f ftyle is^f0*
different, which occasioned the firft doubts a*Petr.3i
bout it (as it happend likewife to St Peters Paul-
fecond Epiftle upon the account of its ftyle)
and then the Novatians alledging fome Texts
in the Epiftle to the Hebrews in favour of
their opinion, this made the Orthodox the
lefs inclined to receive a Book,, which before
had been difputed, and therefore tho it was
received in the Eaft, it was queftioned at
Rome7 where Novatian begun his Schifms.
The fecond Epiftle of St Peter might be fcru-
pled on the fame account, and both that and
the Revelation of St John being alleclged for
the Millennium^ by fnch as undeftood ir in \
I 4 profs
l#o T6e Reafonablenefs and Certainty
grofs fcnfe, this caufed the Authority of thofe
Books to be called in queftion, which is faid
' E^fcfc. * exprefly of the Revelation.
fhfk Kb. 2> 5ome Epiftles were written to particular
" perfons, or direcled to fuch as lived at a
great diftance, and by reafon of Perfecutions
arifing, the Authentick, Epiftles might not
readily be produced.
3. Some Books were not ufually read in the
Churches, as the reft were. All the Books of
Scripture, except the Revelation of St Johny
are inferred in the Catalogue of the Council
of Laodicea, and this was omitted, becaufe by
reafon of the abftrufe Myfteries contained
in it, it was not publickly read in Churches:
for that Catalogue was defigncd to (hew what
Books ought to be read in the publick Afiem-
blies. But the Revelation was long before ac-
knowledged to be genuine by f Jufiin Martyr ,
by Iren&its , and by lertullian^xnd others: both
tJuftin J!tfi'in Martyr and Ir&raas wrote a comment
Mfurr. upon the Revelation of St John. The Epiftle to
T-ruH f^e He^ews, the Epiftle of St James, and the
ik "iicfur. the iecQnd Epiftle of St Peter, are cited by
p- *i > }*.• Gktiatj Romanus, in his firft Epiftle, which
Marcion. was itfelf wont to be read in Churches.
lib. ii. c
5. iii. c. '4. Eufeb. Hift. lib. iv. c. 18. v. c. 8 . H-iercm. Catal. injo-
bannutn.
4. The Hereticks would ufe all their en-
deavours' and fubtilty to hinder the reception
of
of the Chriftian Religion. 1 1 1
of thofe Books, by which their Herefies were
jdifproved, and they might fo far have effect,
as to make fome doubt for a while of their
Authority. For inftance, Diotrephcs, an am-
bitious afpirii% man, who prated againft St
John with malicious words, and had lb much
power, as to cafl the Brethren out of the Church,
would forbid the receiving of St Johns Epi-
ftles, as well as the receiving the Brethren of
that Apoftles Communion 3 and that he did
this, St John himfelf intimates, when he fays,
I wrote unto the Church, but Diotrephes, who
loveth to have the Pre-eminence among them,
receivethus not, Joh. Epift. iii. 9. that is, he
received not St Johns Epiftle, for that would
have been to receive him as an Apoflle, or
to acknowledge his Authority.
XI. Tho the Authority of fome Books
hath been queftioned by private men, yet
thofe Books were never rejecled by any Coun-
cil of the Church, tho frequent Councils were
called in the firft Ages of Chriftianity, and
had this very thing under consideration.
f Tertullian, after he had turned Montanift,* Tertuii.
reje&ing the authority of Herd's Pujiorv as^Pud^
not being received into the Canon oi Scrip- ' ' '
ture, fays, that it was reckoned amongft the
Apocryphal Books by all the Councils of his
Adversaries, the Orthodox.* From whence
it is evident, that in TertuUians time divers
Councils had pan: their Cenfure upon the A-
pocryphaj Books, and that the. Canon of
Si rjh
123 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
Scripture had been fixt long before. So that
the time, in which fomc of thefe Councils
were held, muft probably be, whilft St Poly-
carp a Difciple of St John was yet living,
whofe Martyrdom by the earliA computation
was not till A. D- cxlvii. at leaft they muft be
held in Iren<eus life time, who converfed with
St Polj/carp, and lived at the fame time with
Tertullian. Thus was the Canon of Scripture
vouched by thofe, who had received it from
St John, and Councils upon occaflon were cal-
de jejun.ted (which f Tertullian elfewhere mentions as
c 13. very numerous and frequent in Greece) to give
teftimony to the Genuine Canon, and cenfure
Apocryphal Books. It is •manifeft that the
Canon of Scripture was fettled before the
t , Council of Laodicea,whkh in the lixth Canon
. * «H % appoints that no Books, * which are extra Ca-
4*ju/k$ nvnem, but only Canonical Books fhould be
kiyt&a. Spread in the Chriftian Afiemblies,and then fub-
r~tKXMi')oyn$ the Titles of the Canonical Books, which
eicf,, ifi Title they had^sZonaras smdBalfawon obferve,
*K<tvovt. becaufe they were inferted into the Apoftles
r* , ..Canons, and all others were ftyl'd uncanoni-
y\ - A cdl. And it is concluded, after the ftricteft
Kctvovix.* examination, by the beft Criticks, that thofe
*iif to. which go under the Name of the Apoftles
kojS< ^ Canons, are the Canons of Councils afiembled
%mnt before the Council of Nice, inafmuch as they
Mma. are referrej to by that Council 5 and that they
JUodcan. are ftyl'd Apoftolical, becaufe they were made
fix. fby ApoftolicaA Men, or fuch as lived next to
the
of the Chriflian Religion. 122
the Apoftles times, and delivered in thefe Ca-
nons what they had received from the ApofHes.
Dr BeveregQ thinks they f were colle&ed into*Bever.
one Body by Clemens Alexandrinits, and Dr p™jea!
Cave Teemed inclined to be of the fame judg- Can. &
ment. As to the Authority of the particular £°d'J^"'
Apoftolical Canon, which contains the Canon mit.vind.
of Scripture, of the Council of Laodicea, gives Cave Hi-
a fufficient Teftimony to it, fo far as it con- in^iem"*
cerns the Books of the New Teftament 3 and Roman,
mews wherein it has been corrupted fince. All
which very well agrees with that which I
obferved from TertitUian, that frequent Coun-
cils were called in the firft Ages, and that
they had the Canon of Scripture among other
things under confideration, which we find fet
down in the laft of the Apoftles Canons, and
from thence, in the Canons of the Council
of Laodicea 5 no Book being omitted but the
Revelation of St John, which yet had been
acknowledged and received as Authentick
from the beginning of thofe who had moft
reafon to know of what Authority it was 5
but none were inferted into the Canon, but
fuch Books as were appointed to be conftant-
ly read in the Ahemblies of Cbriftians. It
appears then that the Canon of Scripture was
finilhed by St John, and that fuch Books as
were not of Divine Authority were rejected,
by Councils held, when there were living
Witnefles to certify St John's Approbation of
the Canon, or at lean: thofe, who had recei-
ved it from fuch Witnefles 3 the Gqfpels of
i j..' * the
i 24 The Keafonahlenefs and Certainty
the other Evangelifts were translated into di-
mxs Languages in St Johns Life time, and we
muft in reafon fuppofe the fame of the other
Books of Scripture $ this is certain that they
were all very early translated into many
Tongues, and difperled into fo many Hands,
in fo many Countries, that it was impoffible
they mould be either loft or falfifyed, eipe-
ble daily fince the feveral fe&s of Chri-
stians were never more jealous and watch-
ful over each other in any thing than in this
particular, the feveral Interefts and Pretenti-
ons of all parties being chiefly concerned in
it, and no Catalogue of Books could have
been received exclusively to all others, but up-
on the cleared evidence.
XII. When it once appeared, that the Books,
which had been doubted of, belonged to the
■Caipon of Scripture, they were afterwards ge-
nerally acknowledged, and conftantly recei-
ved in all Churches : every Seel has Since ufed
all Arts and Endeavours to reconcile the Scrip-
tures to their own Dodtrines , few or none
prefuming to reject the Authority of any of
thefe Books, which they would never fcruple
to do, if they fuppos'd they could make out
arypjauhble pretence for it. Proteftants have
retufed to admit of the Apocryphal Books, as
inlpired 5 but whoever have gone about to re-
ject any part of the Canonical Scriptures, have
peen univerfaliy declared againft for it.
whereof no other realbn can be given, but
fjie Evidence, that is for the Authority of the
Ca-
of the Chriftian Religion, 125
Canonical Books of Scripture, which is want-
ing for theAuthority of the Apocryphal Books*
Papifts own the Authority ot the firft Epiftle
to the Corinthians, and of the fourteenth Chap-
ter of that Epiftle, which is directly againft
praying in an unknown Tongue 5 and they ac-
knowledge the Epiftle to the Galatians to be
genuine, tho the fecond Chapter be fo clearly
againft the pretentions of theChurch of Rone.
Thefe Efpiftles indeed were never controvert-
ed : but the Epiftle to the Hebrews likevvife
is not rejected by the Socinians, the Divine
Nature of Chrift and the Merit and Satisfacti-
on of his fufferings are fo plainly aflerted in
it 5 and they dare not deny the Authority of
the Gofpel and Epiftles of St John, tho they
are fo hard put to it, to expound them to
their own fenfe, that Socinus was forc'd to
pretend to I know not what Revelation to
help out one of his explications, which he-
would not have done, if he could have found
out any colour for not admitting the Au-
thority of a Text, fo directly contrary to his
own Tenents, that he could not expect, that
any thing lefs than a Revelation mould pro-
cure any credit to his Interpretation. And
generally the cafe is the fame with other
Sects .• thofe that diner never fo much one
from another in the Interpretation of particu-
lar Texts, yet agree in the acknowledgment
of the Authority of the Canon of Scripture
itfelf, or can find out no fufficient pretence to
difown it. CHAP.
i6 the Reafcnallenefs and Certainty
CHAP. V.
Of the various Readings in the Old and
New Teftament.
i
T is to be ob ferv'd , that an extrardinary
Providence has in a great meafure fecur'd
the Holy Scriptures from thofe Cafualties
which are incident to humane Writings. For
the great Antiquity of many Books of the Scrip-
tures, beyond that of any other Books in the
World, the multitude of Copies, which have
been taken in all Ages and Nations, the dif-
ficulty to avoid miftakes in tranfcribing Books,
in a Language which has fo many of its Let-
ters and of its Words themfelves fo like one
another, the defect of the Hebrew Vowels,
and the late invention ("as it is generally
now acknowledged J of the Points,the change
of the Samaritan, or ancient Hebrew for the
prefent Hebrew Character % the captivity
of the whole Nation of the Jeivs for feventy
years, and the mixtures and changes, which
were during that time, brought into their
Language 5 in fhort, all the accidents which
have ever happened to occafion errors or
miftakes in any Book, have concurred tocaufe
them in the Old Teftament 5 and yet the dif-
ferent Readings are much fewer, and make
much
of the Chriftian Religion. 12
much lefs alteration in the fenfe, than thofe
of any other Book of the fame bignefs, and
of any Note and Antiquity, if all the Copies
mould be carefully examined, and every little
variation as punctually fet down, as thofe of
the Scriptures have been. But tho from
hence it may appear, that a peculiar provi-
dence has been concerned in the prefer vation
of the Books of the Scriptures, yet from hu-
mane confiderations and arguments, we may
likewife be afliired, that nothing prejudicial
to the Authority of the Scriptures has hap-
pened by any of thefe means.
i. The defect in the Hebrew Vowels, and
the late Invention of the Points is no preju-
duce to the Authority of the Bible, as we
now have it. Tho the Points, which criti-
tically determine the exact Reading of the
Hebrew Tongue, be of a later invention , yet
that Tongue was never without its Vowels.
For Alephyatt.and Jod^nd ("which fome add J
He and Gnajm , before the invention of the
Points,were ufed as Vowels,as it is
evidently proved from Jofephns, ton.proieg0m"
Origen , and St 'jerotn, by the iii. f. 49-
beft Criticks in that Language. It muft in-
deed be confeft, that thefe Vowels could not
be fo effectual to afcertain the true Reading,
as the Points have fince been, but whatever
defect there might be in the Vowels,, it was
fupplied by conftant ufe and practice, and by
fome general Rules, which they obferved in
the
128 The Eeafcnab/e?iefs an J Certainty
the Reading. The Bible being a Book which
by Divine Commandment was fo often
and carefully read both in publick and
private, the Hebrew Text might be exact-
ly read, and the true fenfe certainly re-
tai n'd and known 5 and it is no wonder, that
by coniiant \»& and continual practice and
cuftom from their infancy, the Jews could
read it with eafe and readinels without
Points, which is no more than is ordinarily
done now by men, who are skilful in that
Language, and divers have attained to it by
their own obfervation and induftry. If there
were the more difficulty in the Hebrew Tongue
before the invention of Points, there was the
more care and ftudy ufed about it, the Jews
having times purpofely fet apart, for the read-
ing of the Law, (tudied it with that diligence
and exa&nefs, that they knew it as well as
'jofeph. they did their own Names, or better. * Jo-
\\™\i,fq>kJte expreffes it, it that were podible 5 and
they ufed fo great accuracy both in their Pro-
nouncing and Writing, that there could be
no danger , that any considerable miftake
mould be occasioned by any defect in the
Vowels, before the Points were found out.
Thk was a great part of the Jewifh Learning,
t Confi- £as .j, Bjfhop Walton obferves) the true Reading
fidere of the Text, and they who were mojl accurate and
s- *• exact therein, were honoured mofl among ft 'em and
had their Schools ,and their Scholars andDifciples,
whom they injhuUed from time to time, till at
length
con
of the Chriflian Religion. 1 2p
tength in regard of their many dijper/ions and
banijhments, that the true reading might not be
loji with the Language, they began to affix Points
to the Text, as well to facilitate the reading, at.
to preferve it the better from any alteration cr
change.
But this is an obje&ibn, which .never could
have been made but in the Weftern 'parts of
the world 5 for in the Eaft they commonly
write yet without points, as the Jews likewne
write the Weftern Languages, where they live, ■
without points, in the Hebrew Character, p^1/'
* The Samaritans (till have no points. And g0m iii.fi
f the Children of the Turks, Arabians, and 4f -Moria*
Verfians, and generally of all the Mahometans, g^o' j^l
learn. to* read without them. * Ifaac VbJJiHsKr.Antl~
fays the Afiaticks laugh at the Europeans, be Orient*1
caufe they cannot read as they do wfthouttjofeph.
Vowels, f Schickard confeft, that he had ggj* E*
known Children of feven years of age, read * Voir, d*
the Pentateuch meetly by ufe. * Clenard, and Qb)'11
Erpenius himfelf, who was fo famous for the t Wait.
Arabick, and other Eaftern Languages, bothProle- .
of them declared, that they learned the Ara- f°™'t
hick only by their own ftudy and diligence * Lud.
from Books without points : and Arpenius had p^ d*
attained to (uch accuracy in that Language, Hebr.An*
before he had read#any Book with the points, l.^u- ll.bJ
that Ifaac Cafaubon fo far approved of the "' / $\ '
Tranflation which he had then -made, of the
'Arabic^, Nubian Geography into Latin, that he-
was very earned:, with him to publim it. Lu-
K. devkv-f
20 The Keafonab/enejs anc/Certainty
dovicus Cupel I us befides gives an inftahce from
his own knowledge or one, who when he
had fcarce been taught the Arabic k Alphabet,
made a great progrefs. in that Tongue in four
months, only by his own induftry, and with-
out the help of points.
All thefe things considered, it would be a
ftrange, Paradox to pretend, that there is no
certainty in the Ancient Eaftern way of wri-
ting, and that no body can certainly know
what their Authors meant, nay, that they did
not know one anothers meaning, as ^ell as
we do now in our manner of writing, before
fome certain time, when the points are fup-
pofed to be firft found out.
II. The change of the Old Hebrew Cha-
racter into that now in ufe, . is no prejudice
to tly Authority of the Hebrew Text. Be-
caufe this was but the' writing over that,
which was before in one Alphabet into ano-
ther, the Language being frill the fame : and
this, if it were done with furficient care (as-
we have all the reafon in the world to believe
it was) could make no material miftakes , and
we find ithajth not, by the agreement between
. the Hebrew and the Samaritan Pentateuch ftill
extant.
„ III. TAie Keri and the Kelfy or the diffe-
rence in fome places be iween the Text and
the Tvlarginal Reading, is no prejudice to the
. Authority of the Scripture. For as the vari-.
ous Lections of the Bible are much fewer,
con-
of the Chrijiian Religion. 1 3 1
Gonfiderfng the Antiquity of it, and the vaft
numbers of Copies, which have been tran-
scribed #n all Ages and Countreys, thanthofe
of any other Book : To many, of them may be
eaiily reconciled, and the occafion of them as
eafily difcovered. Some of them were occa-
fion ed by the likenefs of feveral of the Hebrew
Letters, which were not eafily to be diftin-
guifht iti Books written in fuch fmall Cha-
racters, * as St Jerome complains were ufed in * Hieron.
writing the Hebrew Bibles of his time. O-^EzTch
thers happened from Abbreviations, and fome Comment
might proceed from Marginal Gloffes. lib- 8*
It muft likewife be obferv'd, "that all the
words we meet with in the Margin of the He-
brew Bibles, are not to be look'd upon as vari-
ous Left ions, for divers of them were placed
there by the Jews out of fuperftition, becaufe
they fcrupled to pronounce certain words, and
therefore .appointed others to be read in their
(lead- ■ But when the Jews were difperfed into
divers Countreys, their Dialed or manner of
Pronunciation muft needs be different, and
as the fame words were pronounced different-
ly, fothey would in time be differently writ-
ten, which gave one chief occafion to the va-
rious Lections jn the old Teftament, for from
the emulation between the Schools of the Jews
at Babylon and thofe at Jerufalem, there arofe
a fet of various Le&ions under the Title of
of the Eaftcm and the Weftern Readings, butt Vid.
it is acknowledged, that they f are of no mo- J^a£ g
K 2 ment,sr°38?
132 The Reafovabknefs and Certainty
merit, and that as to the.fenfe, it is much at
one which reading is admitted, for they con-
cern matters of Orthography, rather fhen of
Orthodoxy, as Buxtorf fpeaks^ andthejerr/
of Pa/cjib/e and of Europe, who follow the
Weftern Readings, yet do not altogether re-
ject the Eaftern :, but in fome editions have
Id. Pro- printed them both. * The different readings
eg- iv. . o£ qck jfcfjer and Ben Naphtali had the fame
original, the Eaftern Jews following the one,
and the Weftern obierving the other,but thefe
concern the Points and Accents only, and not
either the Words or Letters-
There is no Antient Book in- the World, of
which we can be certain, that we rightly un7
derftand it, if it be neceifary to the right un-
derstanding of a Bcfok,that it be without vari-
ous Lections :, for what Bqok is there without
cm, or what Book of. the fame bi<mefs,and of
any Antiquity, has fo few various Lections as
tlie Bible } and what Book can be Transcribed
or Printed, but it is liable to have miftakes
made in it. ,
IV. No difference between the Hebrew Text
and the Septuagint, and other Verfions, or be-
tween the feveral Verfions themfelves, is any
prejudice to the Authority of the Scriptures,
nor can prove that the Hebrew Text was ever
different in any thing material from what it
is now. The Translation of the Septuagint *,as
it hath been obferved from St jfera»,and others,
is in many places rather a Comment or Para-
phrafe than a ftrid Verfion, and gives the
fenfe
of the Chrifiian Religion. 153
fenfe rather than the words of the Hebrew
Texts. Many times there is fuppbfed to be a
difference,where there is none, for want of a
fufficient knowledge of the Original , as f Dr t Pocock
Pocock has (hewn in divers Inftances , and Bp ^p^d'
Pearfon in others', befides what has been writ- Mof. c.'i,
ten by ffaac Vojfius to this purpofe : and one j. 3, 4-
very skilful in the Oriental Tongues, had£^£ ad
undertaken to (hew the agreemen t between Septuag.
Hebrew and and the Septuagint throughout, ^dic. Can-
and had made a confiderable Progrefs in the Volr^de
work, as Bifhop Walton informs us, Other ]xx. inter*
differences proceed from the miftakes of Tran- Pret-
fcribers, as k muft needs happen in Books, of ^!t#
which fo many Copies have been taken in all . eg'
.Ages*} and' from the rafhnefs of Criticks in 1X' 4<f'
making unneceffary alterations, or by infert-
ing into the Text fuch Notes, as were at
firft placed only for explication in the Mar-
gin. In Come things ot lefs confequence the
Translators might be mifta&en, or they might
follow a different Copy.
*The Authority of the Text of Scripture is
greatly confirme/1 from the* citations of the
Greek and Latin Fathers, from whence it ap-
pears that in the feveral Ages of the Greek
and Latin Churches, the Copies which they
made ufe of had no fuch variations from thofe
we now' ufe, as to be of any ill confequence
in matters of Religion.
As to the Imputation that was charged up-
on the Jews by fome of 'the Fathers, that
K 3 they
1 34 Th* Retfonablenefs an c) Certainty
they had corrupted the Scriptures in fuch
places, as according to the Translation of the
Septuagint, and the fenfe of their Anceftors
mud prove the Trutfrof the Chriftian Religion
againft them • this is to be un,derftood or the
Verfionsof Aqnila^ Symmach'iis^ an&T/jeodcf/'an,
who being all either profett Jews, or Judai-
zing Hereticks, defigned their Transitions
to countenance their own errors, efpecially
Aquila, who undertook his Verfion, purpofe-
\y to oppofe that of the Septuagint. For
it is now generally agreed, that the Jews ne-
ver deferved the Centure of having corrupted
the HebrewText, tho they- perve/ted the fenfe
of it, and where there were various Readings;
chofe to follow that which was molt favou-
rable to their own pretences, tho it w^re in
contradiction to the Judgment of their Fore-
fathers, as well as the Chriftians. Philo'm
a difcourfe cited * by EufeBius (who thereby
Prxpar.' owns the Truth of itj faid, that for thefpace
Evahg. of above two thoufand years there had not
iib.^vm. ^een a worcj altered in the Law, but that -the
Jews would chiffe to dye never fo many deaths
rather than they would confent to any thing
Apion"3 ^ prejudice of it. And f Jofephiis declares of
$>■>• the whole Old Teftament, that ifahad fuffer-
ed no alteration from the beginning down to
* Antiqu. his own Time. * Morinus himfelf, whatever
«£ E°"ft" *ie ^at^ e^ewnere ^ to f^e contrary,declares
*8l P1 'in a Letter to Dr Comber Dean of'CarliJIc, tjiat
he luppofes no man can doubt, but that the
Jewifi
of the Chriflian Religion. \ 35
Jewijh Copies, ceteris paribus^ £e to be prefer-
red before any Copies of the Samaritans ,
which he in his Writings fo highly magnifies.
It mult be acknowledged that the nurnbring
ot the Verfes and Words and Letters, and the
obferving which was the middle Letter of e-
very Book, could flgnify little to the fecuring
of the Hebrew Text entire, becaufe there may
be the fame number of Verfes, and Words,
and Letters in different Books, and the fame
Number of Letters, may make up different
Words, and the fame Words diverfely placed
and;apply'd, may exprefs a very different
fenfe: nor could there be any charm in a
word, that ftood in the midft of a Book, to '
keep all the reft in their proper places. But
this fcrupulous and even fuperititious diligence
of the -Jews ,- in little* things is an evi-
dence of their conftant ftudy of the Scri-
ptures , and of. the grear^ value and reve-
rence they had. for it, lb that they would nei-
ther corrupt it themfelves, nor fuffer it to be
CDrruptqd by others, but were careful and
zealous^to preferve every ever letter and tittle 5
and as. I obferved before froxn Jofephus, they
were fo well acquainted with it, that he
thought he could not fplly enough exprefs
their skill- and accuracy, but by faying that
they knew it better than their own names.
V*. It is evident, and confeft by the Cri-
ticks, that neither by thefe, nor by any other
means, any fuch difference is to be found in
the (everal Copies of the Bible, as to prejudice
K 4 . the
I|£ The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
the fundamej&al Points -of Religion, or wet*
ken the Authority of the Scriptures. All re-
lating to this controverfy has. been eagerly
debated by contending parties, who yet agree
in this, whatever they differed in befides, that
the various Le&ions do not invalidate the au-
thority of the Scriptures, nor render them in-
effectual to the end and defign of a Divine Re-
velation, inafmuch as all the various Le&ions
taken together, are no preiudice to the Ana-
logy of Faith, nor to any Points neceflary to ,
Salvation. * Ludovicur Cap-
fi3"run* "pia2 pelhu, who-had ftudied this
eft, id, quod ftatim libri pri- fubjecl: as much as any man,
ini initio monuimus&fcpi- and ^ wq]{ bJe. f
fis toro opeie mculcavimus, . .
plerafq; omnes, quae obferva- judge of It, alter the ltncteft
ri & deprehendi m lacris li- examination he cQuld make,
bns pofliint, varias Lettiones, r , , , , . '
ieviflimi efle ac pene nui]ms round, that the tilings rela-
piomenti , ut parum admo- ting either to Faith or Pra-
"dum interfir, aut vero perin- n- 1 • i , • fcj
£e?mnino fit, utram i^qua- £jce, are .plainly . contain^!
ris, five hanc, five illam.Lu- m all Copies, whatever dif-
rfbvic. Cappel. Crit. Sacr. Jib. fer*nce fhere jg jn ]e£fcr
things , as in matters of
Chronology , which depend upon the al-
teration, or t^e omiffion or addition of a
Letter, or in the Names of Men, or of
Cities or Countrqys. But the fundamen-
tal Doctrines of Religion are Co difperfed
throughout the Scriptures, that they could
receive no damage nor alteration, unlefs the
whole Scriptures (houid have been changed.
Wherefore not only the mpft learned Prote"-
of the Chriftian Religion. 1 37
fta'ntibutf Bellarmin himfdf, t Caeterum non tanti mo-
, 1 o r> -^- i n. menti funt ejufmodi errores,
and the belt Cnticks amonglt uciniis,qu* ad fidem & bo!
fhe Papifts have 'acknOW- nos mores pertinent, Scriptu,
ledged, that all things relating *F%3%X*S*&
tO Articles Oi Faith , and crepantia variarum Le&io-
Rules of Life, are delivered "um ^ piaionibus quibuf-
intire and uncorrupted in the aut parum, am nihil mutant.
Scriptures , nOtwithftanding Bellarmfa. DeVerboDeilib,
the various Lections. .And
thq fome of the Roman Communion have en-
deavoured to prove the necefiity of an infalli-
ble Church, by Arguments drawn from
hence, yet fays * Bifhop Walton, I do not re- *c<m$der»-
member, that in any particular . controverfy be- ^"J ch
tween them and us, they urge anyone place of \i.]. a,.
Scripture, for their caufe, upon the uncertainty of
the Reading without Points, which plainly fiews,
that there is no fuch uncertainty in the' Text un-
pointed,as is pretended. Y-\Simon complains,that tHift.
the Catalogues of various Lections are much ^lflib 4
larger than they Ougjit to be, and that for thee: 1 3.
moft part they are of no moment,and he charges
Cappellus more than Once, with multiplying em
without Reafon- Morinus indeed made it his
endeavour to lefien the authority of the Hebrew
Text in favour of theSeptuagint, and the
Vulgar Latin, but his Authority is very in-
coniiderable, when compared with thofe of
the fame Communion, who have declared
themfelves againft his opinion. In * the life *J°h-
of Morinus, written by Y.Simon, there is this vita!
Character Qi-Ctppdlus and Mori?? us, that if
they
1.38 The Reafonabknefs and Certainty »
they be compared as to what they have . both
written concerning the Bible, Morinus (hews
more learning in his Books, but it is very of-
ten not to the purpofe, whereas Cappellus has
more fagacity and judgment, and never wan-
ders from his .fubjegt, but proves what he is
upon by theftrongeft Arguments. And asfe-
vere as this Cenfure may teem to be, yet it is
juftiiied in effect, by the confeffion or Morinut
1 Ep.ift. hjmfeif. For he f acknowledged! to Bnxtorf
70. inter • < o j
Antiqu. that he never throughly applied himfelf to the
Bed. O- ftudy of the He^n^Tongue, that he had read
- nothing in Hebrew for 7 years together, and
that therefore he Ad not queftion, but- he had
made many raiftakes, efpecially in his Samari-
tan Exercitations, great part of which were
written in haft, and he was fore cl to ufe fuch
• • a variety of Authors, that he believes it im-
poffible, but that he muft have been often mi-
ilaken. The Authority of Morinus then fig-
nifies nothing in prejudice to the Hebrew Text.
'Hoc And * Spinoza himfelf has owned, that he
^rmare^* cou^ f°r certain affirm, that he had obferved
poilum no fault nor various 'reading, which con-
inenui- cemec[ the Mora r Precepts, that coud render
madder- them obfeure or doubtful.
till- lqen-
daro, nee Le&ionum variefarem, circa moralia documenta, quae ipfa
jobfeura autdubia reddere p<l(Tunt* Trattat. Theolog. Polic. c. 9.
Bifhop Walton has with great learning and
WSfy )lldgment, fummed up the Arguments on all
"-j '3 (ides, and asf F. Si won acknowledgeth, has
> i- ex-
of the Cbriftian Religion. I jp
examined this matter with more exa&nefs
than all that had gone before him. His Po-
lyglot; Bibles give an ocular demonitration to
the truth of .what he maintains, that there is
nothing of conference, either as to Faith or .
Practice, concerned in the difference of the
federal Copies of the Hebrew Text, or of the
feveral Verfions. And as many Se&s and Di-
vilions as there are amongft Chriftians, and
as- many different Tranflations as they make •
ufe of, they all acknowledge the "Authority
of the originals, and their Tranflations in the '
main, are the- fame, however they difagree.in
rendring fome particular paffages, which con-
cern the different opinions of the feveral par-
ties, and upon that account maintain- their
own Tranflation to be more correct than o-
thers. If we allow of Mr * Seldens-]udg- + TaMt-
ment, who was very able to make a true one, Talk.
and far enough from being prejudiced in the
cafe, he fays, the .Englilh Tranflation of the t
Bible is the beft Tranflation in the world, and
renders the fen fe of the Original befl , « taking
in for the Englilh Tranflation the Bifiop's Bible,
as well as King JamesV. However, by dif-
ferent Translations, and by comparing divers
Copies and Verfions to make out the true •
Reading, many Texts become better under-
flood, and more fully explained, than if there
had been but one Reading, and no difference
in the Tranflations.
VI. And
140 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
VI. And no lefs may be faid in behalf of the
NewTeftament than of the Old ^ for the Books
of it were kept from the beginning as p Sa-
cred Treafure, with great care* and reverence,
and .were- conftantly read in the Chriftian Af-
femblies, and foon tranflated into all Lan-
guages. The Primitive Chriftians chofe to
undergo any Torments, rather than they
would deliver up the Books of Scripture to
their Perfecjitors to be deftroyed, and they
were no lefs careful to prefer ve them uncor-
rupted by Hereticks. Befides, when Hereticks
attempted to corrupt any Text of Scripture to
ferve their particular Herefles, they were de-
clared agajnft not only by the Orthodox, but
by other Hereticks, who were not concealed
for thofe opinions, in behalf whereof the
corruption was' intended. So that it was im-
podible for any corruptions to be impofed up-
on the Church, or to pafs.undifcovered even
by fome of the Hereticks themfelves. They
muft be defigned for fome end, and to autho-
rize fo.me particular Doftrines, and then all,
who were not tor thofe Doctrines, and more
efpecially thofe who wereagainft them, would
certainly oppofe fuch corruptions.
The agreement like wife of the Greek, Text
of the New Teftament, with the 'fevenil an-
cient Verfions, and with the quotations found
in the Writings of the Fathers, 'who cited
and alledged them from the times of the Apo-
files,; proves that there have been no alterati
ons
of the Cbriftian Religion* 141
ons of any fuch confequence as to make the
Scriptures inefficient for the ends of a Divine
Revelation. If any man be of another opi-
niori, let him inftance in any one Article of
Faith, or Rule of Life, which cannot be
proved from the Scriptures, it is not enough
for him to (hew, that fome one or more
Texts, which have been brought in proof of
it, are difputed, but he muft (hew that it
can be proved by no Text, which is clear
and undifputed. * 0
The various Le&ions of the .Holy Scriprures
are fo far from being an Argument againft
their 'Authority, that they rather help to
prove it, (ince they are comparatively fo few
in a Book of fo great Antiquity. For no
care and regard, inferiour to that, which we
muft fuppofe men to have of a Book, which
they are convinced is of Divine Authority,
could have produced a lefs variety of Readings
in a Book of much lefs Antiquity. They are-
all of no confequeuce to the prejudice of the
end and defign of a Revelation 3 and therefore
they, come under the number of fuch Acci-
dents, as God cannot be obliged in his pro-
vidence to prevent. But the Bible could not
without the fignal providence of God, have
been preferved for fo many ages, under fo
many changes and revolutions, which the
Wifdom of God, for reafons elfewhere ob-
ferved, faw fit to permit, much lefs could it
have cfcaped with fo incotifiderable variati-
ons,
142 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
©ns, unlets it has' been fecared by a particular
providence, from thofe corruptions and al-
terations, which are fo frequent in Humane
Writings.
CHAP.- VI.
Of the difficulties in Chronology^ in the.
. Holy Scriptures.
•%
CHronology is the part of Learning, which
is moft nice and difficult to be exa&ly. I
adjufted, becaufe it depends upon fo many fe-
veral Circumftances , and comprehends fo
great a variety of affairs in-all Ages and Na-
tions, and how pim&ually foever the accounts
of time be fet down at ftrft, yet the leaft alte-
rations in one word or letter may ciufe a
great difference in Copies,, and the difference
*of Epochs* in the computations of different
Countreys, efpecially at great diftauces of
time as well as place , is ' fuch, that the
exadteft Chronology may eafily be miftaken,
and may be further entangled and perplext by
thofe, who endeavour to reftify what they
think amifs, for that' whiqfi was exad at rirft
is*often made faulty by him,who thought it fo
before.Butl fuppofe,that no material exception
will lye againft the Scripture upon the account
of any difficulties' in Chronology , if thofe two
things
.
of the Chriftian Religion. 14 j
things be made out. I. That differences' in
Chronology do not infer uncertainty in . the
matters of fact themfelves. II. That diffe-
rences in Chronology do not imply, that there
was any Chronological miftake made by the.
Penmen of the Holy Scriptures-^ but that they
have been occasioned by the miftakes ofTran-
fcribers or of Expofitors.
I. Differences in Chronology do not infer
uncertainty in the matters of fact themfelves.
Becaufe the point of time is but one circum-
ftance, and that eafily miftaken by a thoufand
accidents, and there may be many other cir-
cumstances fo particular, and fo well attefted",
as to give fufticient evidence to the truth of
things related, notwithstanding any uncertain-
ty in the circumftance of Time. For which
reafon * Vhtarch did not* reject the Relation * piuc. i-
of a difcourfe that paft between Solon and Cr<%~ Solon.
fes, tho he could not anfwer the objections '
brought from Chronology to prove it feign'd,
-becaufe he found it delivered by good Authors,
and faw nothing" improbable in it, but every
thing very likely and fuitable to Solon's tem-
per$ and he thought it unreafonable to reject
a matter of fact, which had no other objecti-
on againft it, but fome difficulties in- Chrono-
logy ^ when* fays he, innumerable perfons
have endeavoured to rectify the Chronologi-
cal Canons, but could never be able to this
day to reconcile the.differing opinions. The
uncertainty of Chronology is a general com-
plaint
144 Jhe Reafcnailenefs and Certainty
plaint made by the beft Hiftorians, and there-
fore if this objection have any weight, it
muft invalidate the Authority of all Hiftory.
A very learned and accurate Author has •
t AfrMU- fhewfi the uncertainty in Chronology f du- ,
fell! of L ring the firft Monarchy, both in refpecf: of
siBtfiop Kingdoms, viz. the Kingdom of AfTyria itfelfi
. and the Kingdoms contemporary with it, and of
lJ erf oris and Occurrences. But doth this prove
that'there never were any* fuch Kingdoms, nor
any fuch Perfons and Occurrences ? It is un^
certain when the City of Rome wasfirft built 5
•Saluft. for * Saluft and others, contrary to the com-
Beii. Ca-mon opinion, that it was founded by *Romu-; \
lus, have afcribed the foundation of it to the
t.Piu- Trojans. And f thofe who make Romulus *
rarch. in the Founcier, yet are at a ftrange difagreement |
mulo. concernn]g tne porents 0f Romulus, and the.
time of his Birth. Some have called his
Mothers name Ilia, fome Rhea , fome . &/-..
■via, others , as Livy , Rhea. Silvia $ yet
ftill there is a further difference about the'
time of the foundation of the City ,
which has occafioned great difputes
among Chronologers. What then muft
follow from hence ? Why, if the uncertainty
, of the time ,w hen any Facl: was^ done, imply
the uncertainty of the Eatt itfelf, we muft
fairly 'conclude, that it is uncertain whether
* Tempo- Rome was ever built at all, Or at leaft we
{"• muft, with * Tc mp or arius' believe, that there
DeLonft. never was any fuch man as Romulus., The,
lib. iii. Copies
of the Cbriftian Religion. 145
Copies of Diogines Laertius place the Time of
Epicurus's Death 9 years before he was born,
as * Menagius has obferved 5 but the enemies *M«ug.
of Religion have too great a value for Epicu- Diog.Va-
rus, to give him up for that Reafon, and to ert.
conclude that there never was fuch a man.
But it is yet more ftrange that the time of fo
late and fo remarkable a thing as - the taking •
of Conjiantinople by the Turks mould be pla-
ced by fome a year fooner than by others.
This was an Action known and* difcourfed of
throughout all Europe, and. is a pregnant In-
ftance, how little Reafon there is to difpute
the certainty of a Thing from any uncertainty
of Time, if other- Circumftances concur to af-
fure us of the Truth of it. The Qhronologers
are not a little ajhamed, fays Mr Gregory, that T '
they Jhould not be able to fatisfy us , con- debris &
cerning fo late and famous a calamity as *j&e£pochis.
Siege of Constantinople by Mahumed the Se-C' 3'
cond.
II.The differences inChronology do not im-
ply, that there was any Chronological miftake
made by tn*e Pen-men of the Holy Scriptures,
but they arife from the miftakesof Tranfcri-
bers or Expofitors.To be convinced of this we
need only refleft a little upon fome of thofe
things, which are apt to caufe miftakes in the •
Computations of Chronology 5 and it
will foon appear, how unreafonable it is toi-
magin, that no Book can be of Divine Infpi-
ration, which is not fitted to fecure men from
L ths
\^6 Tht Keafonablenefs dndCertaint)
the errors , which it is natural for them to
commit in things of that intricacy.
I. Many difficulties in Chronology are oc-
calioncd by not obferving, that that which
had been laid before in the general is after-
wards rcfumed and delivered in the particulars
contained under it. For the total fumm of
any term of years being let down firft, before
the particulars have beeninfifted upon and ex-
plained, has led fome into miftakes, by fup-
pofing, that<the particulars afterwards men-
tioned were not to be comprehended in it,
but to be reckoned apart, as if they had hap-
pened afterwards in order of Time, becaufe
they are laft related in the courfeof the Hifto-
ry. Thus Gen. xi. 26. it is faid that Terah
lived feventy years and begat Abram 5 and verf.
32. rhat the days of Terah were two hundred
and five years : and Terah died in Haran. But
Gen. xii. 4. it is written that Abram was feven-
ty and five years old when he departed out of
Haran : which is inconfiftent, if we fuppofe
that Abram lived in Haran till die Death of
his Father Terah : but if we conuder that the
whole number of years which Terah lived is
fet down Gen. xi- 32. and that the departure
of Abra?n out of Haran, which is related Gen.
xii. yet happened before his Fathers Death,
there will be no inconliftency 5 but it will be
evident, if Terah was but feventy years old
when Abram was begotten, and Abram was
but feventy five years old when he went out
of
of the Chriftian Religioh. a 47
bfHaran, thzt.Abraw left his Father Terah irt
Haran, where he lived after Abrams departure
from him to the age of two hundred and five
years. Tho during his Father's life he did upon
occafion return to Haran. For the final removal
Of Abrjim was not till the death of his Father,
as we learn from A&s vii. 4. And if this way
of relating that in General firft, which is af-
terwards fet forth in the Particulars, be at-
tended to in the Interpretation of the Scri-
ptures, it will afford a Solution of many diffi-
culties 5 as * St Aitfiin has obferved, which *0AuJ'^
Otherwife are inexplicable. Others fuppofe Gen<£ i.
Abram was the youngeft of Terah's Sons, tho2*-
mentioned firft, and then there is no difficulty
in the Chronology 5 only by this and other
inftances we may obferve that the eldeft Bro-
ther is not always placed firft in Scripture, but
fometimes the youngeft, out of refpeel; to him,-
for his favour with God, and his greater dig-
nity and worth : and therefore whatever dif-
ficulties in Chronology arife upon this fuppo-
fition, that the Son firft named muft therefore
neceffarily be firft born, proceed from a mi-
(take*
2. Sometimes the principal number is fet
down, and the odd or lefler number is omit-
ted, which being added to the great or prin-
cipal number in feme other place, caufesa dif-f
ference not to be reconciled, but by con fid er-
ing that it is cuftcmary in the beft Authors
L '2- not'
?43 .The Reafonablevefs and Certainty
not always to mention the .leffer numbers,
where the matter doth not require it. And
we have evident proof of this in the Scri-
ptures. The time of the fojourning of the
children of Ifrael in the land of Canaan, and
of their dwelling in Egypt is faid to, be the
fpace. of four hundred years, Gen. xv. 13.
Ads vii. 6. which yet was in all four hundred
and thirty years, Exod. xii. 40. Galat. iii. 17.
The Ifraelites, who came out of Egypt, are
computed to be fix hundred thousand and three
thousand and five hundred and fifty, Num.i. 46.
ii. 32. but Mofes fpeaking of them, N1tm.xi.21.
leaves out the three thoufand and five hundred
and fifty. Jerubbual or Gideon is faid to have
had thrdefcore and ten Sons by his Wives, be-
fides Abiwelech, whom he had by a Concu-
bine, Judg. viii. 30, 31. and Abimelech is of-
ten faid to have llain thefe.rhreefcore and ten
brethren, tho Jotham the youngeft of them is
at the fame time faid to have efcaped, Judg.xx.
5, i8r24, 56- The Benjamites that were llain,
Judg.. 20. 35. are (aid to* be twenty and five
thoufand and an hundred men, whereas verf.46.
they are reckoned only twenty and tiv$ thou-
fand men- 1 Cor. xv. 5. we read that our Sa-
viour wasfeen of Cephas, then of the twelve,
tho St Matthias was not chofen into. the num-
ber of the Apoftles till after the Afcenfion of
Chrift, and St Mark lays precifely that he ap-
peared unto the elcve?i as they fat at meat, Mark
xvi.
of the Cbriftian Religion. 1 4^
xvi. 14. Thus in Heathen Authors the Tro-
jan * Fleet is faid to confift of
a thoufand Ships, whereas .^S^™^
Homer makes them tWO hun- cumdicimus mille nave:, iiile
dred more , as f Ihucydides ?d,TroJam> c'^?™rale eff,
1 ' y judicium Rom*. Varro us
reckons 'them, or one hun- ReRuft. Hb.ii. c. 1.
dred fixty fix, by his Scholi- * Thucyd. lib. i.e. 10.
afts counting, but the Hiftoritm did not care
to be Co pun&ual. The Judges ftiled Centum-
viri among ft the Romans, were at firft five
more than an hundred, and afterwards '* al- * Piinjib
moft twice that number , yet ftill they re-vl; Epl*
tained the fame name , as the LXXIl . Inter- Jj •
prefers are commonly ftiled the Septuagint.
Since therefore it is manifeft, that the lefier
Number are fometimes omitted both in the •
Old and New Teftament, as well as in other
Authors, and the principal and greater num-
bers, whether more or lefs than the precife
Calculation, afe only fet down, and at other
times the lefier numbers are fpecified, it is rea-
fonable to make abatements for this in adjuft-
i ng the accounts or Chronology.
3. Sometimes an Epocha may be miftaken by
Clfronologers': as Gen. vi. 3. And the Lord
faid my Spirit fiall not always jlrive with man :
for that he alfo is flejt), jet his days fiall be an
hundred, and twenty years. But from Gen. v. 32.
compared with Gen. viii^ig. the Flood runft
happen but an hundred years after thefe words
feem to have been fpoken : tho if we compute
not from the. time, when this was threatned,
L 3 but
} 5 o The Reafonablenefs an J Certainty
put from the beginning of Man's Apoftacy,
which we may fuppofe then to have been al-
ready Twenty year?, there will be no difficult
ty in it. Or elfe the Threatning, tho placed
after it,might be denounced Twenty years be-
fore the Five hundreth year of Noah's Age,
which falls under the obfervatjon above-men-
tioned of St Atiftjn. f St Jerom indeed fays
o^f in°n t^iat t^ie t*me a^owec^ mankind, for Repantance
Genef. was (hortned for their Contumacy, and the
Flood was brought upon the World twenty
years fooner than was defigned, if their Pro-
vocations had not haftned it.
4. Variations in Chronology may fometimes
proceed from the likenefs of two words, which
' occafloned the writing the one for the other.
Thus Adis xiii. 20. fome read, i( i^'x rs re****-
eioKy not t]i<ii Til&toirUn. Some famous Copies,
from whence moft others now^remainjng may
have been tranfcribed, might happen to be
uncorrect in fome of thefe lefs material
parts of Scripture : the Numeral Letters were
eafily miftaken,as we fee our Figures now are 3
and when they numbred by Letters, miftakes
might the oftner happen, becaufe the Tran-
scribers might unawares write down a Letter
of the foregoing or following Word inftead of
the true Numeral Letter, when there was any
likenefs between them ^ and the Hebrew Let-
ters being fome of them fo very much alike,
might be a readier occafion of miffake. This
• change of Numeral Letters fome think to t^ye
Pt
of the Chriftian Religion. 1 5 1
occafioned the difficulty concerning the Age
of Ahazia. fon of Jehoram King of Jitdah, when
he began to Reign, 2 Kings viii. 26. 2 Chron.
xxii. 2. And that fuch miftakes have been
made in Tranfcribing the Septuagint is evi-
dent, becaufe the feveral Copies ot that Ver-
fion have different accounts of Chronology,
and they alfo differ from the Copies made ufe
of by Africanus and Eufebius. Miftakes of this
kind are very.* common in all « '• ,
Gl j t +■ a ^1 Error fortafie ex notis or-
reek and Latin Authors, tus nufquam non iflo mo-
and tO prevent this inCOnve- do in bonis urriufq; Lingua
niency, Mr Greave, acquaints figSftZ&gSZ'g,
US, that the Emp erOUr Ulng em. Sed non dubito Lib ari-
Bee, Nephew to Tamerlane °rum Petius negiigentia, pre-
. o' r t . , . - iertim tot jam lectins mcerce-
the Great, f in hlS AttrOnO- dentibus vericatem fuiffe cgr-
mical Tables f the moft aCCU- niptwn, quam ut Propheta er-
r • i -i-i n_N i taverit. bicuc in hoc iplo no-
rate of any m the Eaft) has ex- ftr0opufculo furmum credi-
preft the numbers Of the prill- mus,ut defcribentium incuria,
^;.™1 i?«,^U„v CO. T„ \X7 ^-^ qux non incuriofea nobisfunt
cipal Epochas, hrft in Words, digefta)Virientur. suipic. Se-
at length and again in Figures, ver. hh>. Sacr. lib. 1. c. 70,
and then a third time in par- f Greaves pyramid°sr.
ticular* Tables : whofe example this excellent
Author alledgeth for his own exa&nefs in
defcribing the dimensions' of the Pyramids
after the fame manner^ fuppofing it very im-
probable , if any one of thefe Accounts
mould happen to be altered, that two of
them mould net agree, and that thofe two
which agree, (hall not exprefs the true num-
ber.
5. In fome* places the Alterations, which
I/4 caufe
152 The Reafonab/enefs and Certainty
caufe the differences in the Chronology of the
Septuagint from that of the Hebrew Text are
fo uniforrn,that they could not be made but by
defign of fome Tranfcribers, or of the Tranfla-
tors themfelves. For inftance, in the Lives of
the five firft Patriarchs, and ofExoch the * fe-
vid- ; venth they, add an hundred years before their
;ape°]i.lc"! having children, and deduct the fame number
:hron. of years from the time they lived afterwards :
acr' which is conjectured to have . been done, be-
caufe they fuppofed that by years there, are
to be underftood Lunar years or months, and
fo they altered the Chronological account of
their Lives. For if thofe be the years meant
by the Hebrew account, they muft have been
Fathers of children at 5, 6, 7, or 8 years of
Age. Another conjecture is, that it might be
fuppofed, that as Mens lives were longer then,
fo the Age at which th#y were capable of
Marriage muft not be the fame that it is now,
but muft bear proportion to the length of
their Lives, and therefore they altered the
Chronology to make the Patriarchs fathers of
children at fuch an Age, as might anfwer to
the Age at which men are capable of having
children in thefe latter times.
The mention of Cainax, the fon of Ar-
phaxad, both in the Verfion of the Septuagint
and in the Gofpel of St Ln/Se, tho it be not in
in the Hebrew , is a matter of greater Difficult
'role- ty. ButMhop * Waltev notwithftanding faw
nJ^ fiifTicienf Keafon xo cpnclude however, with
fuci}
&c
of the Cbriftian Religion. 153
fuch caution and candor as became fo great a
Judgment, that the Septuagint followed the
Hebrew Copies of thofe times : and the An-
fwers to the Arguments brought to prove the
contrary, have fincc been confiderably enfor-
ced by the Learned f Ifaac Vojjuts. Jd &*£
There is reafon to believe that the Hebrew Georg.
and the Samaritan Account were the fame * in Horn- c-
St J crow's time, and that the difference between * Siqui-
them has happened fince. dem & in
6. The Son often reigning with the Father, J^jJJ.
his Reign is fometimes put down as commenc- tanorum
ing from his Partnership with his Father iri jjbfisita
the Kingdom, and in other places from his rep?riUEt
Reigning alone after his Fathers deceafe. vix* Ma-
Thus the difficulties are explained concerning &" *Hie_
the beginning of the Reigns of Jehoram King ron.
of lfiael Son of Ahab, and Jehoram King of {£**;£
Judah Son of Jehofaphat, i Kings, i. 17. iii. I. & CapelL
Fofitisfaid exprefsly that Je hofap hat. being ^hron-
then King ofjudah, Jehoram the Son Jehofa-
phat King of Jftdah began to Reign , 2 Kings
viii. 16. It is like wife manifefi:, that Jehoafi
the Son of Jehoahaz King of Jfrael rauft reign
with his Father 3 years, 2 Kings xiii. 1, 10.
This isalfo applyed in the explication of other
Queftions by St * Jerom. The Reign of A- * Hierqn
zariah is computed from his taking the Go- ad vitaI-
vernment upon himfelf at fixteen years of Age
in the 27th year of Jeroboam King of Ifrael $
for then he is faid to begin to reign, 2 Kings
xv. i. whereas his Father Amaziah lived but
to
154 The Reafonab/enefs and Certainty .
to, the 15 th year of Jeroboams Reign, 2. King,
xiv. 1 7. In the Kingdom of Ifrael there was a
long Interregnum between Jeroboam the fecond
and Zachariah, 2 Kings xiv. 23. xv. 8. Some
affign a threefold computation of the years of
Nebuchadnezzar's reign, the firft From his lay-
ing Siege to Jerusalem, the fecond from his
taking it, and the beginning of the captivity,
the third from his entire Monarchy after the
conqueft of Egypt. Others affign two begin-
iugs of Nebuchadnezzar s Reign, the one from
his coming with his Army into Syria, during
the Life of his Father, the other from his Fa-
ther's death.
7. The Terms of Time in Computation are
fometimes taken inclufively, and at other times
exclusively, Matt.xvn. 1. we read, After fix
clays Jefus tahjeth Peter, James, and John his
Brother, and bringeth them up into an high
'Mountain apart 5 and in like manner, Mark, ix.
2. But this is (aid Luke ix. 28. to come to pafs
about an eight days after } which is very con-
fident with what the other Evangelifts write.
For St Matthew and St Mark fpeak exclusively,
reckoning the (ix days between the time of
our Saviours difeoqrfe, which they there re-
late, and his Transfiguration $ but St Luke
includes the day in which he had that dil-
• courfe with his Qifciples, and the day of his
l,Ught!r Transfiguration, and reckons them with the
flarm. of X o > -nit- -* w 1
jht tf. i ux intermediate days. The Rabbins "* alio ob-
*( !?• icrve, that the very firft cjay ot a year may
of the Chriftian Religion. 155
ftand in computation for that year : and by
this way of reckoning, miftakes of years V«r-
retit for years compleat, or years compleat for
years current, in the fucceffions of fo many
Kings, and the Tranfactions of affairs for fo
long a time, may amount to a considerable
number of years. For this realon f Thncydi- 1 Tim-
des fays he computes the years pf the Pelopon-cvyd' ^b*
nefati War,not by the Magiftrates yearly chofen
during that time, but by To many Summers and
Winters.
Thefe, arid feveral other ways, by which
Difputes in Chronology may be occafioned,
are a fufficient Argument to us, that they do
riot imply, that there were originally Chror
nological Miftakes in the Books themfclves.
And if they might fo many ways arife with-
out any error in the Original Writings -y if the
fame difficulties occur upon fo very nice and
intricate a fubjeft in all Books in the
World,and it could be by no means neceffary,
that Books of Divine Authority mould be ei- '
ther at firft fo penned, as to be liable to no
wrdng Interpretations, or be ever after pre-
ferved by Miracle from all corruption, it is
great rafhnefs to deny the Divine Authority
of th,e Scriptures upon the account of any
difficulties in Chronology.
, PflfAp,
15^ The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
CHAP. VII.
Of the Objcurity of fome Places in the
Scriptures, particularly of the Types
and Prof he fees.
HEre it mod in the firft place be remem-
bred, that it has been a common and
true obfervation, that all Authors are rather
perplex'd and obfcured, than explained by a
multitude of Commentators $ and this is lb
true of no Book as of the Scriptures : for as
none has had fo many Glofles and Comments
put upon it by men of all Ages and Nations 5
fo raoft of them endeavour to find out fome
new Explication, or to ferve aCaufe^ and
maintain fome particular opinions by their
Expositions. So thac it is a wonder that any
part of the Scriptures mould be clear, after
Volumes have been written, I may truly fay,
upon every Text 5 rather than that difficulties
fhould be found in them. But at the fame
time it muft be acknowledged, that we find
it declared in the Scriptures themfelves, . that
there are places of difficulty in them : which
makes it hue fo much the more unrcafonable
that this mould be urged as an objection
againft them. For what is acknowledged and
profeft, muft be fuppos'd to be with a defign,
and
of the Chriftian Religion. 157
and for fome good reafon, and thereafon
and defign ought to be inquired into, before
this be ufed as an obie&ion. St Peter fpeak-
ing of drift's coming to Judgment fays, that
St Paul in his Epiftles had delivered fome things
hard to be underflood ^ and St Paul himfelf in-
timates, that there had been miftakes concern- • .
ing what he had written in this matter, 2 Theffi
ii. 1, 2, 3. St Peter on this occasion fays, that
it fo happened not only to St Paul's Epiftles,
but to other Books of the Scriptures, thro the
ignorance and raflinefs of unlearned and un-
liable men , 2 Pet. iii. 1 6. And. it happens
more efpecially in thofe places of Scripture,
which are concerning things of this nature, or
contain whatever Prophecies of things to
come. Therefore I (hall, I. give an account
how it comes to pafs, that there are things
hard to be underftood in the Scriptures in ge-
neral. II. I (hail in particular confider the ob-
fcurity of Prophecies, and (hall prove the cer-
tainty of the Types made ufe of by the Pro-
phets, and (hew that there is great force and
evidence in the Arguments brought from them.
III. I (hall prove that the obfcurity. of fome
places of the Scriptures is no prejudice to the
Authority of them, nor to the end and defign
of them.
I. I (hall give an account in general, how
it comes to pafs, that there are (ome things in
the Scriptures hard to be underftood.
1. Some
1 5 8 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
i. Some Do&rines, which it mightily cotf-
cerns us to be acquainted withal, could not be
delivered in fo plain a manner, but that they
rauft needs have great difficulties in them, as
the Doctrine of the BleiTed Trinity, of the In-
carnation of Chrift, of the Refurrection, and
f ot the Joys of Heaven and of the Torments of
Hell. There are feveral things which we are
capable of knowing, and which are necehary
to be known, of which yet we cannot have-To
perfect and abfolute a knowledge, but that
tbmething of them will dill remain unknown
to us. As there is no object more vifible, or
better known to us than the Sun is ^ but to
calculate the dimenfions and the diftance of
the Sun from us, to know, how its light is
communicated, and fuddenly fpread over the
face of the Earth, are things of great difficul-
ty, and can never perhaps be fully accounted
for : In likemanner,what the Scriptures deliver
to us concerning the Nature of God, and the
ftate of the World to come, muft needs
have difficulties in it, tho we are' never fo
well allured that there is a Cod and a
future (late 5 becaufe thefe are things above
our underftandings 5 we may 'perfectly
understand that there are fuch things , but
can have no full and clear conception of all
ihnt may be fit to be delivered to us con-
cerning them. Nothing can be made
'plainer to us, than we are capable of know-
ing it, or than the Nature" of it, and the
pro-
of the Chriftian Religion, 15^
portion our Faculties bear to it, will allow.
God being incomprehensible, whatever is de-
livered concerning him, can never be without
all difficulty, and whilft we are in this world,
we can never underftand the ftate of the next
fo fully, as we mall do hereafter. And thefe
are difficulties which muft be, unlefs the Na-
ture of the things, or our own Nature were
different from what it is.
Neverthelefs, the greateft Myfteries in the
Chriftian Religion,fo far as they are revealed,
and fo far as they are required to be known by
us, contain no inexplicable difficulties .* but if
we will needs know more of the Myfteries of.
Religion than is revealed,and more than is re-
quired to be known, no wonder if we meet
with' difficulties. What is meaut, for inftance,
by the Do&rine of the Trinity, is capable of
being very well understood, as the. oppofers
of this Doctrine muft own, unleis they will
confefs, that they oppole they know not
what. He that fays a thing is not true, knows
what it is which he pretends not to be true, if
he underftands what he fays. The thing
then is known, tho there be difficulties in the
explication, but the explication concerns the
manner of exiftence, not the truth of it. For
that may certainly be, and we may certainly
know it to be, which yet we know not how
it fhould be. And trie Doftrine itfeif only is
revealed, as neceflary to be believed, not any
particular explication of iu And if it can be
proved,
160 The Keafonablenefs an J Certainty
proved, that this is the Do&rine of Scripture,
and it be plain to be underftood what is meant
by this Doftrine, as it is delivered in Scripture,
this (hews the plainnefcof theChriftian Reli-
gion in all things neceflary to Salvation, tho
divers things relating to this Doclrine be dif-
ficult to be explained, becaufe the Dodrine is
plainly enough and intelligibly delivered, fo
far as it is required to be underftood and be-
lieved.
Several Arts and Sciences, which are very
difficult and abftrufe in the Theory, are eafy
in the Practice, and a man may very well un-
fterftand what the Theorem itfelt is, which is to
be proved, tho he be altogether uncapable of
underftanding the proof of it. Now, what
God fays, is as certain as any ■demonftratiort
• can be, and wh'at he has plainly delivered, is
plain as well as certain $ and it is never the
lefs certain or. plain, becaufe we cannot make
out the proof of it, nor are able to under -
ftand how it can be. It is fufficient that the
Scriptures are plain an this Dodrine, fo far as
we are concerned to know it ^ it is not necef-
fary that the Doctrine itfelf fhould be plain
in all the controverfies, which may be raifed
about it : when we know the meaning, we
muft take Gods word for the Truth of it.
The manner of the diftin&ron of Perfons and
the Unity of Effence in, the Godhead is not
required to be believed, but the Thing, and
We know the Thing to be fo, becaufe God
him-
t
of the Cbriftian Religion. \€\
himfelf has fa id it, tho we can know nothing
of the manner of it. We know the Propofiti-
on, which is to be believed, tho we cannot
make good the Proof of it in the way of na-
tural Reafoning, but only from the Authority
of the Revealer, which is of it felf fufficient,
and ought to be inftead of all other R,ea(ons
to us.
2. Some parts of the Scriptures were fitted
and accommodated to former Ages, and were
more proper and ufeful for them, than if they
had been written in fuch a manner, as to be
lefs obfcure and difficult. We may well ima-
gin, that many parts of the Scriptures muft
have been more peculiarly adapted to their
ufe and advantage, for whom they were im-
mediately defigned .- and the Learning and
Wifdom of ancient Times confifted in Para-
bles and Proverbs and obfcure Forms of Speech,
in Prophecies, in Subtil and Dark Parables, and
in the fecrets of grave Sentences, Eccl. xxxix. i,
2, 3. And it was foretold of the Mejfias in
particular, that he mould fpeak in Parables,
as a matter of great excellency. I will open
my mouth in a Parable, J will utter dark fayings
of old, Pf Ixxviii. 2. Matt. xiii. 35. This was
in Ancient Times the Language of Courts,
and the propereft way of Addrefs to Kings.
Nathan the Prophet, and the woman of Te-
kfia came to David with a Parable, 2 Sam, xii.
J. xiv. 4. And JehoaJJj King of Jfrael fent a
Meflage of the fame nature to Amaziah King
M of
162 The Reafonableneft and Certainty
*1 eo- of Judah, i Kings xiv. 9. and Cyrus* an-
dot. Jib.i. £wers t[ie petition of two Nations at once to
him in a (hort Parable. To underfland a Pro-
verb, and th*e Interpretation, the words of the
wife, and their dark, fajings, was the beft de-
fcription that Solomon himfelf could give of
Wifdom, Prov.L 6. And * Solomon and' Hiram
are related by Jofephw to have propounded
Problems and Riddles or Parables to each o-
ther, upon condition of a forfeiture to be paid
by him who could not explain the Riddle fent
him. This would be looked upon now as a
ftrange correfpondence between Kings 5 but
then it was otherwife thought of ^ many of
their Epiftles were preferved, as he tells us, to
his time at Tyre $ and the Heathen Hiftorians,
vvhofe Teftimonies he produceth, thought it
deferved their particular obfervation. This
cuftom of propounding Riddles was as old as
Sampfons time, Judg. xiv. 12. and examples
of the fame nature are to be feen in Herodotus
f and other Auth6rs. Whether it be true or
ialfe that Homer died of grief, becaufe he could
not explain the Riddle of the Fifhers, it (hews
that Riddles were in great requeft amongft
the Ancient Greeks : for otherwife there
could have been no ground either for
the Truth or Fi&ion of fuch a ftory. Plu-
tarch relates it, as the true canfe of Hojners
death $ and when f Herodotm denies this, he
owns the Report 5 and by the Verfes, which
he fays Homer (poke upon this occafion, it ap-
pears*.
of the Chriftian Religion, \6->
pears what opinion Homer had of this fort Of
Wit. Hefiod is by * gjiintilian thought the t QuintiK-
Author of the Fables, which pafs under thej^1™'^
name of JEfop $ however, this makes it pro-xi.
bable that he . did write Fables, and perhaps
there were few men of Learning and note in
thofe times, who did not.
.• Mythology was in the higheft efteem a-
mongft the Ancients, and indeed all the An^
cient Learning was of this kind. The JEgypti-
an s, who were in great Reputation for Learn-
ing , delivered their Notions in Hierogly-
phicks, as if they had refolved not to be un-
derftood. And the Philofophers of old, Fy-
thagoros, Heraclitus, &c* greatly affected ob-
fcurity. Socrates himfelf, and Plato and Art-
ftotle purpofely concealed their meaning iri
many cafes from vulgar capacities : and Thu-
cydides took the fame courfe in his. Hiftory,-
and was obfcure out of defign, aS Marcellinus
has obferved in his life. The Books of the Old;
Teftament for the moll: part feem to have been
the moft plain, and the mod eafily intelligible
of any Writings of ancient times • and they
could not have been more obvious, but they
muft have been contemptible and ufelefs to
thofe for whom they were immediately de-
signed. The precepts and exhortations are al-
ways plain and obvious, and the obfcurity of
other things is fo far from being an exception
to the Books of Scripture, that it was ne-
ceflary according to the Learning and. Cuftoms
of ancient times, M 2 The
1 64 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
The Parables of our Bleffed Saviour are
explained to us, and there can now be no
pretence of obfcurity in them , and in his
Difcourfes with the Jews, to whom they were
not explained, he alluded to thofe Proverbs
and Cuftoms, which were bed: known and
moft in ufe among them, to whom upon any
occaflon he fpoke 5 that thereby all,* who had
ears to htarjxxA were not by their (ins hindred
from attending to what they heard, might
be the more affe&ed with them, and the bet-
ter inclined to give themfelves up to his In-
ftru&ions, when they heard him make ufe of
fuch Allufions, as they knew, according to
the way of teaching amongft them, had fome
excellent hidden meaning, which they would
be very defirous to become acquainted withal.
3. Many places, of Scripture, which are
obfcure to us , were not obfcure in
the ages in which they were written.
(j.J Becaufe the obfcurity for the moft
part is rather in the form and manner of
Speech, than in the notions themfelves ^ fo
that that might be clear at firft, which is ob-
fcure to us, who are but little acquainted
with the Phrafes and Idioms of theLanguage,
and the Eloquence of thofe Times and Coun-
tries. For the Fafhions of Speech, vary as
much as thole of the Garb and Habit, and
the Eloquence and ways of Expreflion are as
different, as the Dialects and Languages of
divers Ages and Nations. (2.) The names of
Ani-
of the Chriftidfi Religion. 1 65
Animals, of Flowers and Plants and Minerals
are very liable to be miftaken, and efpecially
whatever is peculiar to any Country, muft
needs be difficult to be underftood by Fo-
reigners, who have no fuch things among
them, and perhaps want words to exprefs
their Nature, and can fcarce have a true and
exact, notion of them. The precife value of
Coins , and proportion of Weights and Mea-
fures ufed fo long ago,and in Countreys fo far
from ours,can hardly now be known,and muft
necefTarily admit of great variety of opinions :
there is much uncertainty about thefe in all
ancient Hiftory, but the great Antiquity of
the Jewifi Hiftory above others may make us
reafonably expeft to find many more fuch
difficulties in it, and the different Names of
the fame Perfons, and of the fame Places in
the Scriptures is another occaiion of obfcurity.
The Names, Coins, Weights, and Meafures,
and Habits of ancient times afford the great-
eft work for Criticks, which were fo well
known , when the Authors who mention
them, wrote, that it had been ridiculous for
them to explain them. Thefe are difficulties
of that Nature, that they could not be avoid-
ed, but by the care and concernment of an
extraordinary providence 5 and they are of fo
little moment, that it could not be expected,
that God (hould particularly concern himfelf
to prevent them.
M 3 (5 J Th«
[%66 The Reafonabknefs ancl Certainty
(3.) The Penmen of the Scriptures, in
their Proverbs or Parables, often allude to
~Cuftoms,or to things, that happened in thofe
times, in which they lived, that were then
commonly known, but being unknown now,
may well make many places of their Writings
obfcure to us, which were not fo to thole
of their own time. This is alledged as the
. .■ 1 rcafon of the oblcurity * of
C^fiten^^V^^1^ rheLaws of the Twelve Ta-
Scribentium.fed infcitiae non bleS among the Romans^ at
afTequentium : «gw»3" the diftance of lefs than fe-
quoq; lpft, qui quae S>cnpta
iunt, minus percipiunf, culpa ven hundred years alter
yaca'nr. Nam longa a?tas vcr- their firft being enafted. And'
baatq; mores vereres oblice- ... &
ravir, quibus verbis moribuf- thus It IS 111 all Books of Anti-
que fentemia legum compre- quity, efpecially in luch Books
henfa eft A. Gell. lib. xx. ^ , J '• K. ' r
" ™a eu* as have irequent occafion to
hint at things fo notorious at the time when
they were - written , that it was needlefs
to give, any particular account of them.
-This has made Notes and Comments necef-
fary upon all Ancient Books, and thofe places
need themmoft, which treat of things forT
merly fo well known, that the Authors did
not think fit. to infift upon them, but fuppo-
fed them, and only alluded to them, rather
than expreft or explained them- For which
rcafon we owe the Informations which we
have of the Roman Antiquities chiefly to
Greek Authors, becaufe it had been abfurd
for RotKans,wrhmg to men of their own City
and Nation, to acquaint them v/ith the cu-
stoms
of the Chriftian Religion. \6j
ftoms of Rome, which they knew as well as
themfelves 3 but thofe things were proper for
Foreigners to take notice of, for the infor-
mation of Foreigners. And whatever Allu-
fions, either in Parables or otherwife, are
made to fuch things, muft needs be difficult
to us, becaufe whatever is thus fpoken with
reference to any thing, can be known no
better than the thing itfelf 3 and that which
ferved for an Uluftration at the firft Writing,
rendeVs the fenfe obfcure, when the thing
tifed for Uluftration, becomes unknown. No-
thing is more generally known than t-he pro-
verbial Sayings of a Nation, to the people of
it ^ but there is nothing that needs more ex-
plication to Foreigners. And thefe Sayings
are very frequent both in thedifcourfes of our
Saviour, and throughout the whole Scriptures:
for thev are the moit ilsmiflcant and inftrucl ive
way of Difcourfe, and the mod eafily appre-
hended by fuch as are ufed to them. The
ufe of Proverbs is natural to all Nations, and
they are the refult of the experience and ob-
fervation of any people : So that the moft
effectual and readieft way of Inftrucf ion is to
apply thefe Sayings generally known and re-
ceived, to particular cafes and occasions. But
then thefe commonly depend upon the cuftoms
of a people,or upon fome Hiftory,or particular
Accident, and oftentimes are taken up at firft
upon fmall occasions, and the intention and
(ignification of them is apt to be forgotten,
M 4 or
1 6 8 the Reafonablenefs and Certainty
or miftaken in future Age, or by other Nati-
ons. And therefore all places of Scripture,
expreft in Allegorical or Proverbial Forms
of Speech, or by Types and Refemblances
of things, muft needs have been better
understood in thofe times, when they were
written, than they are now, becaufe we have
but an imperfect Notion of many things, to
which the Allufion is made, or from whence
the fimilitude is taken, and the very thing
which makes them now obfcure to us, "made
them the more plain and intelligible to them,
who lived at the time of their being writ-
ten. *
^Maim (^/) Maimomdes * lays this down as a fun-
yoch. "damental Rule of the explication of the
Praef. Scripture , that we fhould attend to the
main Scope any Defign of Parables, and not
infifl: upon every word and circumftance,
which is added to make them more Natural,
but not as any neceflary part of them- And
in thofe Ages, when Prophecies were fo fre-
quent, and Types and Allegories fo conftant-
ly made ufe of, they had certain Rules and
Bcij. jud Methods f of Interpretation^ we learn from
Jib. in. c. Jofepbus, which thro length of time and the
J4' corruption of fucceeding Ages are now loft.
And it is certain, that the Jews in the time
of our Saviour and his Apoftles were often
confufed and (iienced by them with the
Application of Types and Prophecies, which
were then acknowledged to belong to the
Mefi
of the Chriftian Religion. 169
MeJJias, and were ever fo underftood by the
Jews, but would fcarce be underftood fo by
us, if we did not find them thus interpreted
and apply'd.
We fee then, that the obfcurity of many
places of Scripture proceeds from the length
of Time, and other accidents, and that there-
fore it could not be prevented, unlefs God
mould make a New Revelation to every Age
and Nation of the World : which yet would
be of little effecl: to thofe, who will not be
convinced nor perfwaded by that Revelation
which we have in the Scriptures. Tho the
Scriptures were defigned for the Benefit
and Inftruction of all Ages and Nations,
yet they often had a more direft-and imme-
diate Regard to the Age and Nation, in
which they were firft penned. We have
nothing left but the Names of mod of the
Hiftorians, mentioned by St Jtrom as necef-
fary to be read in order to explain the Pro-
phecies of Daniel, and many objections made
againft the Scriptures would have no pretence,
if we knew the circumftances of affairs, and
had a compleat Hiftory of thofe times, to which
they relate 5 but God having given us full
evidence, that the Scriptures are written by his
Appointment and Direction, expe&s to be
believed upon his word, and has not thought
fit to gratify the curiofity of men, who will
disbelieve it- And if men will ufe any tole-
rable care and diligence , the Senfe and Im-
portance
170 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
portance of the Scriptures may be fo far un-
derftood as is needful, in all Times, whatever
difficulties there may be in fome particular
paflages.
II. I (hall confider more particularly the
obfcurity of Proprieties, and (hall (hew what
certainty there is in the Types made ufe of by
the Prophets.
i> As for any differences, which are to be
met with in the Interpretation of Prophecies,
they may proceed partly from the Infirmities
and Pailions of humane Nature, by which it
comes to pafs, that when men undertake to
write upon any fubjecf, they are feldom fatis-
fied with what others have faid before them,
but are forfeeking out fome New Interpreta-
tion of their own : And partly from the dif-
ficulty of fixing the particular and precife
time of Actions. But this is no more an obje-
ction againft Prophecies, than it is a gain ft the
Truth of all Hiftory 5 'and we ma/ as well
conclude, that things never came to pafs, be-
caufe learned men differ about the time of their
being done, as that they were never/ prophe-
fied of, for the fame reafon. Expofitors may
differ in the niceties of -the Chronological
part, but in the main they are agreed, and
whoever will be at the pains toconfult them,
rfiay be greatly confirmed in the Truth of
the Prophecies, upon this very con (id era t ion,
rhat there is lefs difference in the explication
of the Principal Prophecies, than there is in
the
of the Chriftian Religion. 171
the Comments upon moil Hiftories 5 and that,
thofe who differ in other matters, rnuft have
the greater evidence for that in which they
do agree. Tho there be fome difficulty and
variety of opinion in the calculation of the
precife time, when fome Prophecies were ful-
filled, becaufe it is difputed where the com-
putation is to begin, or how fome other cir-
cumftance is to be underftood^ yet all Exposi-
tors are agreed concerning thefe very Prophe^
fies that they are fulfilled. For inftance 5 i^is
certain that the Scepter is departed from Judah,
whether that Prophecy be tobeunderftoodof
the Tribe of Judab, or the Jewife Nation de-
nominated from that Tribe, it is certain, that
the City and Sanftuary are deftroyed, and
the Sacrifice and Oblation taken away, tho
Interpreters do not agree about the precife
time'and manner of the accomplishment of
ever^ particular. Plain matter of Fact (hews
that the Prophecy is fulfilled, and there is no
difficulty but about a Circumftance ^ • and to
doubt. of the fulfilling of Proprieties, becaufe
we do not certainly knqw the exact time
when every particular was fulfilled, .tho we
certainly know that they mud have been all
long fince fulfilled, is as unreafonable as if a
msn mould queftioq the Truth of Hiftory up-
on the account of. Uncertainties in Chrono-
logy. What man doubts whether there
were fuch a man as Homer, becaufe it is un-
certain when he lived ? or whether th
The Reafonab/enefs and Certainty
ever were a Trtfan War, becaufe the time of
the taking otlroy has been varioufly deter-
mined } And yet is there not as much reafon
to reject this, or any other Hiftory, which
has occasioned difputes in point of time, as
there can be to doubt of the truth of Darnel's
Predictions, concerning the deftru&ion of Je-
rufalem, becaufe there may be matter of con-
troverfy in explaining his feventy Weeks ?
The Prophecy it (elf is plain, and the Accom-
plishments certain, however men may differ . m
in affigning the Epocha of time. Hiftory
relates what has come to pate, and Prophecy^
foretells what (hall come, and our uncertain-
ty in point of Time no more affe&s the Cre-
dibility of the one than of the other. We
may be uncertain of the time foretold by the
Prophet, and as uncertain of the time men-
tioned by the Hiftorian, but when all other
Circumftances agree, there is no reafon Vhy
our uncertainty as to the (ingle. Circumftance
of Time mould be alledged againft the Cre-
dibility of either of them. But the Obfcurity
arifing from the difficulties in Chronology is
fpoken of in the former Chapter.
2. Some Prophecies were purpofely obfcure,
becaufe they did not fo nearly concern the
Age, in which they were delivered, but were
defigned not fo much for the information of
preceeding Ages, as for the confirmation of
Pofterity in the Truth of Religion, when
they fee them fulfilled. God doth not
fend
of the thriftian Religion. 1 7^
fend Revelations to gratify the curioflcy of
men, in acquainting them with what (hall be-
fal their Pofterity, but rather conceals the
knowledge of future events from men, be-
caufe the knowledge of them might have an
ill effect, in making them proud, or carelefs
and negligent 5 or elfe too follicitous and con-
cerned about what was to befall their
Pofterity. Tlie Judgments and Affli&ions
of Parents would be fo much abated if they
had a clear profpecl: of the happinefs of their
Pofterity, that they would lofe that effecl:,
which God defigns by fending his Judgments.
And a perfed view of the miferies, which
were to beial the Pofterity of the moll:
happy Parents, would render the Bleffings of
Cod the lefs Bleffings to them. So that both
the Rewards and Puniftiments of this life
would very much lofe their force and effecl:,
if Prophecies were lefs obfcure than they are.
It is a fufficient Reafon for the obfcure
and myfterious delivering of fome Pro-
phecies , that they thereby ferve to prove
the Faith and Patience , and excite the
Care and Watchfulnefs of men: for which
reafon, the day of Judgment , and the
day of every, man's Death is concealed
from us, becaufe the particular and diftind
Revelation of thefe th ings would caufe fecu-
rity in fome and defpair in others 5 and the
cafe is the fame as to the deftrudion of
Churches andNations.- We are commanded to
watch
j 74 the Reafonablenefs and Certainty
watch and pray, watch ye therefore, left co-
ming fuddenly he find yon fleeping, and what
J fay unto yon , I fay unto all, watch, Mark xiii.
• 35. Which in the direft fenfe of the
words concerns Jerufalem, but the reafon
of them will extend to the deftru&ion of any
other City, or to any other judgment which
God has foretold, but has concealed the time
or other circumftances, either by filence or
by uncertain and myfterious forms of Speech.
A full profpeft of Profperity to come often-
times has proved fatal to men : Jeroboam,
Hazael, and Jehu, were the worfe probably
for the Declarations made to them 5 as Achi-
thophel, if it had been foretold plainly, what
would befal him, would in all likelihoed
fooner have haftened his own death. Whe-
ther therefore the event be good or bad, and
whether it concern our felves or our Pofterity,
it is fit moft times that it mould not be clearly
revealed to us, becaufe this. would in great
meafure exclude the exercife of the Graces of
Faith and Hope, and Patience in men, under
their prefent condition. And at the time of
fulfilling the Propheiies, which are -now
moft obfcure, fuch a continued Train and
Series of Aftairs, with air their Circun>
ftances and Particularities , may appear in
fo full and undeniable evidence, as may
convince Infidels, and confirm Believers in
the truth of, the Predictions, and of the
Religion taught by the Prophets, by whom
the events were foretold . ("3 .) Ob-
of the Chriftian Religion. 175
(3.) Obfcurity was necefTary in fome
Prophefies, at the * Fathers obferve, becaufe * Eufeb. -1
without a conftant Miracle to preferve EvS°ubl
• them, they would otherwife have been loft, vi. pro.*
and would never have been delivered down §£' £ { .
to Pofterity. Of this Nature are fome of ifai. c.viT
thofe Prophefies , which relates to our Sa- The°d<>;
viour's ftate of Humiliation, his Poverty, zech.
and Crucifixion and Death, to the deftru- Pre-
dion of Jemfalem, and the rejection of the
Jews, which by the Circumftances are ma-
nifeft to us in the AccompliQiment , but
were written with fome obfcurity to con-
ceal them from the obftinate and malici-
ous Jews, that feeing they might fee and not
perceive : for if they had fully underftood
the fcope and importance of them, 'they
would have endeavoured rather to have
fuppreffed and deftroyed them, than they
would have fufFered them to remain to be
urged agaiaft themfelves. A People who
were fo wholly pofTefTed with the Notion
and Expectation of a Temporal Mejfias,
would have rejected thofe Prophefies which
fet forth his Humiliation and Crucifixion, if
they had been exprefled in plainer terms.
They would have fpared Chrift no more in
the Prophefies o£ him than in his Per-
fon.
Again, Obfcurity was necefTary, .becaufe
*fome events could never have been brought
to pafs, if they had been exprefsly and in
plain
ij6 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
plain terms foretold , unlefs God would
have forced mep to the Accompliihrnent of
his Predictions, which muft have taken a-^
way the Liberty of Human Actions. For
men would fcarce have ventured upon fuch
Actions, as they knew before-hand muft end
in Affliction and great Calamity, and per-
haps in the ruin of themfelves, or of their
Families or. Nation ^ and yet it may be ne-
cefTary, that thefe things mould come to pafs, <
for the wife ends of Providence, and for the
Good and Salvation of Mankind. Few would
have (hewn that Courage and Refolution,
which St Peter and St Paul did in preaching
the Gofpel, if they had been told fo long be-
fore, as St Peter was, that it muft end in Mar-
tyrdom, or if the Holy Ghoft had witnefled
in every City concerning them, as he did of
St Paul, faying in exprefs terms, that bonds
and affli&ions did abide him 5 moft other men
would have been moved> tho he was not, by
any of thefe things^ Acts xx. 23. For we find
that the Difciples upon this* account
were earneft with nim not to go up to Jem-
falem. So difficult is it for the beft men in the
beft caufe to relblve to meet certain and appa-
rent Dangers. The nature therefore of fome
things requires, thai they mould not be more
particularly described in the Proprieties con-
cerning'them. For either they muft have been •
obfeurely fpoken of, or elfe they could not
have been prophefied of at all : becaufe if
they
of the Chriftian Religion, 177
they had been clearly foretold, they could ne-
ver have come to pafs $ which implies a con-
tradiction : for it is impoiTible that what God
declares by his Prophets mould not be fulfilled.
If all that was to befal the Church of Chrift
had been fefc down with the circumftances of
time and place, and perfons,by St John in the
Revelation, fo as to prevent the objections of
thofe, who except againft the obicurity of
that Book, this certainly would have proved
a great discouragement to many Chrift i a ns in
the performance of their Duty, and mufthave
hindred the bringing to pafs the events, unlefs
God (hould have over-ruled the minds of men,
and forced them upon acting, which had been
to deprive them of their Freedom of Will.
4. If Prophecies had punctually foretold
the things to be fulfilled in all 'their Circum-
ftances, men would have purpofely contrived
to frame their actions in fuch a manner, as to
appear to fulfill many of them, and when-
ever they had been fulfilled, it might have
been fuppoled to have been by deiign and
contrivance. Which would have been only
to act a part, or live by a rule and pattern
defcribed and fet before them ^ but when
the obfeurity is fuch, that they become fulfil-
led without any Intention or Knowledge of
the Perfon employed in fulfilling them, this
manifefts the wifdom and providence of God.
If Prophecies had been lefs obfcure.men would
have been the more prone, to venture upon
the commiiTion of fin in order to fulfil them.
We find by experience, how apt all Enthufiafts,
* M and
178 "The Reafonabknefs an J Certainty
and fuch as perfwade themfelves that they
have a clear and perfect knowledge oi
the obfcurefi: Prophecies, are , to think any
thing lawful to be done, which may bring a-
bout thofe events, that they fancy to be the
Accomplishment of them. And if the events
of all Proprieties had been concealed under nc
obfeurity of words and circumftances, but had
been obvious and vifible to every Reader, the
number of fuch undertakers would have been
much greater ; for it is a hard matter to make
men diftinguifh between theaccomplifhmenl
of Prophecies, and the fin which is of-
ten committed in the accomplishment oi
them $ but when they can ferve their Intereft
by it, they .are willing to believe the worn: acti-
ons lawful , .which may fulfil a Prophecy 5
and the clearer Prophefies had been, the more
occafion and pretence had been given to fuch
dilutions, to which none are now fubjed, but
fuch as think them clear, and perfwade them-
felves, or would perfwade others, that they
throughly underftand them.
5. Another rea'fon is, that fometimes a Pro-
phecy may be delivered obfcurely,in mercy to
-the Inftrurnents, who are to bring about thee-
xent foretold by it. For God forefeeing that
fome men, notwithstanding the cleared Reve-
lations, would perfift in their wickednefs, and
become inftrumental in accomplishing the
predic~tion,may in mercy to them forbear to dis-
cover the particulars of the event, left this
mould add to their guilt, and prove a great
aggravation both of their crime and punifhment.
Our
of the Chriftian Religion. i jp
Our Saviour, tho he knew from the beginning who
it was that fiould betray him^ yet concealed it,
till his laft Supper, and then difcovered it to
Judas in the mildeft manner, to move him to
Repentance, if he had not hardned himfelf a-
gainft it 5 not to make him defperate upon the
difcovery of fo wicked a defign.
Again, other Prophefies may be hid in ob-
fcurity for a judgment upon thofe who are
obftinate, and will not make a due ufe of the
means afforded them of Salvation, but harden
their hearts, and refolve to continue impeni-
tent againft all the methods which God has
been pleafed to ufe to reclaim them. For of
fuch our Saviour ' gives this reafon , why he
fpoke to them in Parables, that feeing they might
fee and not perceive, and hearing they might hear
and not underftand, left at any time they fiould
be converted^and their fins foould be forgiven thtmy
Markiv.12'. For when God has both by Mira-
cles and other Prophefies unqueftionably clear
and plain,admoniuYd and forewarnd em of the
folly and danger of their ways, and they will
take no notice of it, but reject his Kevelations,
and juft affront his mercy, it is very for him
to deny them that furthet Declaration and Ma-
nifestation of his Will and Power , which
might effectually produce a true Faith in 'em,
and bring 'cm to Repentance, efpecially when
the obfcurity of Prophefies may be con-
ducing to the methods of his Providence, and
to his gracious defigns of mercy towards other
men, who have not ftood out in fo bold a de-
* M 2 fiancs
iSo The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
fiance of his other Declarations of himfelf.
God e?7dureth with much long-fuffering thcvejfels
of wrath fitted for definition , he hath mercy on
whom he will have mercy , and whom he will he
hardneth : and therefore the obfeurity of Pro-
phefies may be in mercy to fome, to prevent
the aggravation of their fins, and for a judg-
ment upon others to harden them.
6. It is the Glory of God to conceal a things
but the honour of Kings is to fear ch out a matter \
Prov. xxv. 2. The obfeurity of Prophecies
may be defigned to abate the confidence, and
confound the pride of fome, and to provoke
the diligence and induftry of others. For as
fome men care to be at no pains to attain the
mod ufeful and necelfary knowledge, fo others
defpife all that is obvious, and have no fatis-
fa&ion in the knowledge of fuch" things, as are
* Apocn- eafily known by others as well as themfelves.
Immror ^r|d this feems not only to have been the
ha beat fa- temper of thofe Ages, in which the Scriptures
cramenra ,were written, when Learning confifted in
Parom'dix'i Types and Parables, and in dark and intricate
prameriro di fcourfes, but it has been the ftudy and de-
n?«°hiis ^§nt °f ^carned men in moft Ages fince, and
emm's in- of many men in all Ages to fearch into hid-
fnfvcrbisft clcn and difficult truths. St Jerom extols the
fiigulis Revelation of St John for the obfeurity and
Muhipii- hidden fenfc of it. In that Age, it feems,it was
iuteiwUr no obje&ion, but the higheft character that
tix Hie- con Id be given ofthe Revelation, to fay that
P4uiin*.d it was difficult to be underftood. The wif-
fcpift. dom of God therefore in condefcention to all
forts
of the Cbriftian Religion* i 8 r
forts of men, and to fit the Scriptures for the
ufe and benefit of all capacities and dif oofiti-
ons, has caufed fome of the Prophecies to be
plain and obvious to all Pleaders, and others
to be delivered as to employ the pious and
humble labours of the molt Learned and Inqui-
(itive, to keep them in perpetual dependance
upon God for his Grace and Affiftance in the
explication of the Scriptures 5 and at the fame
time to take down the vain curiofity>and pride
of fuch, as little concern themfelves about the
plain things of the Law, but are wholly bu-
lled in unfolding hidden things, and in pre-
tending to under fiand all Myfieries and all
Knowledge. The curfe denounced againft man;
upon his fall was, • that with labour and fweat
he mould eat jhe fruits of the ground, as his
punifhment, for having eaten the forbidden
Fruit j and it was but juft with God to pu-
nifh the curiofity of men after forbidden know-
ledge, which occafioned his fall, with mak-
ing the attainment of knowledge more diffi-
cult.
If the Scriptures were all obfcure, they
woul4 be of little ufe, if they were all obvi-
ous, they would be defpifed. For if obfcuri-
ty be made an objection by fome, their plain*
nefs and fimplicity is objected by others 5 but
God has fo ordered and proportioned the fe-
veral parts of them, that no man may have
juft caufe to complain, that he doth not un-
derftand enough for his Salvation 5 nor any
man caft them afide, or read them with little
Care
i S% f The Reafonablenefs anj Certainty
Care and Diligence, fince there are fo many
things in them, which may require the utmoft
Study and Pains of the moft judicious and
Learned men.
7. There is no Prophet (b obfcure, but
fome Prophecies are very plainly delivered
by him, which we know to have been fulfil-
led 5 and this is a Warrant and Affurance to
us of his Miffion, and that we ought to rely
upon it, that whatever he has delivered con-*
cerning other things will as certainly come to
pafs- 5 and in the mean time,before they come
topafs, or are throughly underftood, they
ate exceeding ufeful in the. Church. The
Revelation of St John is hard to be applyed to
particularevents,becaufe.u comprehends fo vaft
a feries of time, in which long courfe of years
many events may be exactly alike at different
times and in different places, and there may
be a gradual and repeated Accomplilhment of
fome of his Prophecies. But the time was at
hand for the fulfilling of other of thefe Pro-
phecies, Rev. i. 3. xxii. 6,y, 10, 12. and we
know they have been fulfilled in the feven
Churches,.RezMi. 5,16,22,23. iii. 3, 16. which
are propofed for examples to all others. He
that hath an ear, let him hear, what the Spirit
faith unto the Churches, Rev, ii. 7. The feven
Churches are fpoken to by Name , and
what is faid to them, having been fulfilled,
is a certain argument that the reft, which
concerns all other Churches,fhall be fulfilled in
.its due time , tho it be not perhaps yet under-
ftood- But
of the Cbriftian Religion. 18
But the obfcureft Proprieties , even before
their Accomplimment,are of perpetual and in-
eftimable nfe to us. It is acknowledged by all,
thatParables are very proper and fit for Inftru-
ftion, and therefore in ancient times their Do-
ctrines were wont to be delivered in that way 5
becaufe it is a more familiar and safie method
of teaching thau by Rules , and Precepts, and
Rational Dilcourfe, without that Illuftration
which is given to them by fuppofkg a parti-
cular cafe. For then every one is apt to make
the cafe his own, when he fees the Precepts
reduced to Example, and cloathed with Cir-
cumftances, and brought: home, as it were, to
his very fenfes, which before lay more out of
fight, in abftracl: Notions and Speculative Difc
courfe. And if feigned cafes be fo much more
effectual than bare precepts or exhortations, an
infallible account of the ftate of the Church in
all AgeSj tho we cannot point out the parti-
cular times and places, when and where every
thing (hall come'to pafs, muft needs be of in-
eftimable value and benefit.
To hear what thefpirit faith unto the Churches^
to dbferve what errors and faults are reproved,
and what vertues and graces are commended
and encouraged in the feven Churches of Ajia$
the Praifes and Adorations,ch.iv. and the Blifs
of the Righteous,the joys of Heaven, and the
rewards of Martyrs, ch.vii. the Terrorsof the
Great andDreadful day,ch.vi. the great Apofta-
cy that was to be upon theEarth, ch. xiii.the
Patience and Faith of the Saints, and the Re-
fur-
184 Tbe Reafonab/enefs and Certainty
furre&ion of the Dead, ch.xx. the defcription
of the new Jexufalem, and the glory and hap-
pinefs of the City of God, ch. xxi,xxii. thefe
are the fubjeft of St John's Revelation, and are
things of the greateft ufe and importance. We
have the ftaff and condition of the Church in
all Ages preferitcd cq our view, tho we are not
able to mark out the particular times and fea-
fons meant in the feveral parts cf the Piophecy .
And this is at leaftof the fame ufe to us t hat all
Hiftory is,and befides may beof as mucb more
benefit, as it more nearly concern f s: for we
do not know but that we may r ..n into the
word times there prophefyu ^. Here is the pa-
tience, and the faith of the Saints. We fee the
care and providence of God over his Church,
the wonderful deliverances which he is pleafed
to work for it, the fupports which he affords
his faithful Servants under perfections, and
the rewards prepared for them, and the final
deftru&ion of the Enemies of God and Religi-
on 5 thefe things are viiible in the Revelation,
and it cannot be deniedj.but, tfiefe are of excel-
lent ufe,to yield us comfort in the worlt of
troubles, and to excite Faith and >pe,?and
Patience, and all Chriftian Graces in c pe minds
of men. The Revelation of St John may be
look'd upon as an Hiftory of the Church
without any Chronology anqext to it 5 but
will any man fay, that the exa&eft and
trueft Hiftory , that can be penned , of
the mod important Affairs , and fuch
as concern all Mankind, is of little
value,
bf'theChriflian Religion. \j+
Value or confluence to the ConducT: and Ma-
nagement of our lives, unlefs we were like wife
acquainted with the particular time, and the
Names of the Places andPerfons defcribed in it ?
It is as much as our Salvation is worth to be
informed of a Future Judgment, tho' we are not
told when it fhall be ; and that Book which fets
Rewards and Punifhments,Heayen and Hell be-
fore us,is of the greateft Advantage for the Edi*
fication and Salvation of Men, tho* the feveral
Circumftances and Particularities defcribed,ar©
unknown to us. .
8. Tho* the Arguments from Types are
above all, apt to be look'd upon as uncertain,
and to depend rather upon the Conje&ures
and Fanfies of Men, than upon any clear Evi-
dence : Yet we fhall find the contrary, if we
do bur a little confider the Nature of them.
A Type is a Likenefs, a Form, or Mould, fas
the word fignifies) and where the Antitype
reprefented by it, and prefigured, Anfwers ex-
actly to it, there is no more queftion to be
maae, but that the one belongs to the other,
than there is reafon to doubt, when we fee
an ImprefTion made upon Wax, what kind of
Seal it was by which it was made; Or, when
we fee a good Pi&ure of one we know, tq
enquire who fat for it. A Type is much ot
the fame Nature in Actions or Things and Per-
fbns, as an Allegory is in Words : but Allego-
ries are oftentimes fo plain, that no man car*
well miftake what is meant by them, And
thus it is as to Types in many Cafes ; Indeed
. N whertf
i 7 8 The ^eafonablenefs and Certainty
where there is but one Type or one Refem-
blance, it is not fo eafily difcern'd ; but where
many concur, he muft be very wilful that does
not acknowledge the Agreement. When an
Author, as it often happens, defcribes the Per*
fbns of his own Time under feigned Names,
a Reader who knows nothing of it, may per-
haps over- look one or two Charatte'rs, fuppo-
fing them to be by chance; but when he per-
ceives that they all exactly agree to fo many
feveral Perfons whom he knows, he no longer
doubts of the Author's Defign. And when
many Types concur in the lame Peribn, with
a great number of Particularities, any two of
which perhaps never concurr'd in any one
Man before ; as in the Peribn of our Saviour
thefe things concurr'd, that he was compell'd
to carry his Crofs, as Ifaac had carried the
Wood ; that he was lifted up, and faftned to
it, as the Brazen Serpent had been- lifted up in
the Wildernefsj that as the Bones of thePafchal
Lamb were not broken,lb not a Bone of him. was
broken when the Bones of thefe were, who were
Crucified with him ; and that he was Crucified
at the very time when the Pafchal Lamb was
to be Sacrificed: when fo many different Cir-
cumftances concur, which have no dependance
one upon another, nor upon the Will of Him,
in whom they concur, but proceed from the
Will ( and as in this Cafe ) from the Malice of
others ; if thefe things meet by chance, it
muft be a very extraordinary and unaccounta-
ble
r of the Chrijiian Religion. l^k
ble Chance indeed, and much fuch another 39
that wis, which fbme would perfwade us
made the World ; it muft be fnch a Chance as
never happened before, nor will ever happea
again. But muft not thefe Men rather [peak
and think by chance, who can argue at this
Rate?
Sometimes the Characters are (b lively, that
the Types are as evident as exprefs Words
could have made them ; as when in the De-
fcription of the Kingdom of Chrift, he is (tiled
David, becaufe, as he was prefigured .by Qa-
vid% Co he was to defcend from him, Jer. xxx.
9. Ezek. xxxiv. 2$. xxxvii. 24, 25. Hof.Wi, 5-
feveral Defcriptions which were Metaphorical
in reference to the Perfbns immediately con-,
cern'd in them, were litterally fulfilled in our
Saviour: Thus the Gall and Vinegar, the
Cafting of Lots upon the Garments, and the
Piercing of the Hands and Feet are Metapho-
rical Expreffions, of great Contempt and Cru-
elty ufed towards the Perfons to whom they
were at firft applied ; but in their ultimate End
and Defign, they were true to the very Letter."
And where there is thus a Two-fold Signirka-,
tion of any place of Scripture,' the one. im-'
proper and Metaphorical, the other proper anci
Litteral ; the Perfon described in Metaphori-*
cal Terms is as clearly a Type of him, from,
whofe real Condition and Circumftances the
Metaphor is takenV as a .Metaphor is a Repre^
gntation of the plain. Senfe contained undes.
ft' N a rth,i
1 8o The <I(eafonablenefs and Certainty
The Legal Difpenfation was all Typical,
and fo the Jews ever understood it to he;
which made tke Apoftles difpute with thera
from the Types of their Law, as they furely
would never have done, if it had not on ail
fides been agreed, that it was a proper way
of Argument. Their Prophecies were given
out in Actions as well as in Words ; and as the
Mind eiiher of God or Man may be expreft as
fully by Actions as by the plaineft Words:
lb certainly we rauft acknowledge this to be
the Cafe, when Types ib 'evidently denote the
Perfon, and Co properly belong to him, as to
declare and belpeak him to be the 'Man, in
fuch a manner that we fhould conclude, that
any Perfon of our own Times muft needs be
meant by any Author, who fhould thus de-
fcribe him in a Book, the Defign whereof
was known to be, to make fuch Defcriptions.
It is not indeed every Refemblance which we
may conclude from? but where many Types
concur in the fame Perfon, where the concur-
rence depends wholly upon the Will of his
Adverfaries, or not in the leaft upon his own
Will ; when thefe Types were alledged from
a Difpenfation, which was all along held
to be Typical ; in this cafe they may be urged,
and as fafely relyed upon as any other Argu-
ment.
■
III. In* the laft place, I am to fhew that
the obfcurity of the Scriptures is not fuch as
to
of the Chriftian Religion. I 8
to be any prejudice to their Authority, nor to
the End and Defisn of them. And the Rea-
fon of this is implied by St. Peter, when he
fays, that there are but fome things bard, to be
under flood in the Scriptures, and the reft are
plain and obvious. All things necefTary to
Salvation are fufficiently clear in the Scripture ;
and tho* there be other things in them which
are obfcure, yet we lee that R'eafbns may be
given ("and perhaps many more and better
than I am able to produce) why they are
and ought to be fo. God fupplies us in NeceC-
(aries with a bountiful and open Hand ; and
what is not necefTary, he furely may difco-
ver more fparingly and more obfcurely to us.-
It is fo in the things of this Life : Our Senles '
feldom or never fail us . in things necefTary
to our Life and Health, tho* in other things
we find our (elves milled by them ; every
Country and Place affords the NecefTaries
of Life ; and that which is moft rare is al-
ways leaft necefTary ; it may be ufeful ,
but yet we may very well be without it.
Now -to complain that all places of Scri-
pture are not intelligible by all, is, as if
we fhould blame Providence for not making
all Men Rich, and all Countries like the. Land
of Cdftaan ; it is a fign we are refblved to
find fault, and never to be fatisfied with what
we have unlefs we be humoured in every
thing.. But we fhould do well firft to con-
sider, how we can e*pe& this at God s Hands,
• N j os
l8z The ^eafonahlenefs and Certainty
or how well we have deferved it of Him.
The Secret of the Lord is with them that Fear
himy and he will fbetp them his Covenant. Pfal.
XXV. 14* tor the froward is an Abomination
to the Lord, bat his Secret is with the Righte-
ous. Prozf- iii. $2. There are Secrets and My- '
fteries in Religion which cannot be fuppofed
to be known to any but thofe, who are thro'-
jy acquainted "with the plainer Doctrines,
both in the Study and the Practice of them;
land therefore lr no fuch Reafons as have been
now offered, £ould be ^ivcn for the obfcuri-
ty of the Scriptures in fbme places, it would
be unreafonable, however, for fuch Men as
make this an Objection to urge it ; they have
no Right to object whatever others 'may have ;
becaufe they have never ufed theMeans to know
whether the Scriptures are fo oblcure as they
pretend or or not. But they will never be a-
ble to prove, that if things necelTary both in
Faith and Practice be clearly fet down, there
may not be other things deliverd which are
hard to be under flood, and which thofe may
wreft to their own Deflruction, who are unlearn-
ed and unliable ; that is, who have neither
Learning and Skill enough to judge of fuch
Matters, nor yet Constancy and Stedfaftnefs e-
nough in the Faith, to adhere to what
they do underftand, and not to perplex them-
fe!ve<, and fuffer themfelves to be perverted
by judging rafhly of things above their Capa-
city.
The
of the Chrijlian Religion. 1 8 {
The unlearned and unliable only are faid to
wrefl the Scriptures to their own Deftruetion:
And tho' it is not in the Power and Capacity
of every Man to be Wife and Learned, yet it is
in every ones Power not to be unliable, but con-
front andftedfaft to whatheunderftands,and ne-
ver to depart from it for any By-ends or Re-
fpects. Let us learn what is eafy to be known,
and Practice what we know* before we com-
plain that the Scriptures are obfcure. Let us ftudy
and practife the Scriptures more, and this Obje-
ction will not appear fb formidable. But the
Truth is, thofe that moll: ufe it, neither ftu-
dy nor practife them. And yet after all their
Pretences of Obfcurity, they have a greater;
quarrel againft the plain parts of Scripture,
than againft the obfcure ones; they know
many places of Scripture which are plainly
againft them, and this makes them fet them-
felves againft all the reft.
What has been here laid in general, I hope
may be in fome Meafure uleful to thofe who
defire to read the Scriptures for their Inftru-
ction and Edification ; and in particular Difh>
culties Books muft be confulted, or fuch Men
as may be fuppofed to underftand them. But
as for all that are fond of Objections, and read
the Scriptures only in fearch of.them, it can-
not be expected that Difcourfes of this Na-
ture fhould fignify much with them. Teach
us, 0 Lord, the way of thy Statutes, and rve
N 4 M
184 ^e ^^o^blenefs and Certainty
{ball keep it unto the End. Give m under ft and*
ing and we /ball keep thy Law .* Tea we {hall
keep it with our whole Heart. Great is the
"Peace, that they have who love thy Law, and
they are not offended at it. Pfal. Cxix. 33, 34,
• 165.
CHAP. VIII.
■
tumcnimOr Places of Scripture which
refer t ut
eft inEpi- feems to contradiff each other.
ftoUAdn- J
ani, quam
recitatcai. £% *"-j "^Housh tne facred Writers no where
liftratusL. j-o 1 r\ 1
Tedium X contradict tnemlelves, or one another,
D. DeTV.yet they were not folicitOus to prevent the
fimpiiciter beinS fofpeaed to do fo by injudicious and
viii funtdi- rafh Men, as they would have been very cau-
cre,utr mtiousof giving any pretence for fuch a Sufpi-
tnum eun- ■ . -r i 1? j • 1 l J^ i_
drmqae Cl0n» " tney na4 written any thing but I rutru
ancitiatumlt could not be igreeab|jp to the Sovereign
attuTerin"?, Wiidom and Majcfty of .God to comply with
an ad <M,'tlie Humours and Fancies of Men; but rather,
<^*i t.T- when he had by an infallible Guidance and
lant\x Direction prevented the Ten- Men of the Holy
tempore Scriptures from writing any thing but Truth,
reTponde- C° ^er l^Cm C^ ™Vlte ^°> aS tnat tney m*Snt
ri. c.Grot, be liable to the Exceptions of the wilful and
in Adjca. bbrverfe. Becau{l- it is more (x) fuitable to the
xiii. 51^ Hmplici y of Truth, noc to be over-nice and
folici-
of the Chriftian Religion. 185
folicitous about every Pun£hlio and {matter -
Circumftance ; but to fpeak fully and intelli-
gibly, and then to leave it to Men, whether
they will believe or not; efpecially in what is
told them for their own Advantage, the Re-
lators having no end or defign to ferve by ft,
but only to do them the greateft Good they
canj and bringing all the evidence for their
Conviction, that Miracles and Prophecies can
afford, which are the only Means of God s
revealing Himfelf to Mankind, and thenfuf-
fering in Teftimony of what they have de-
livered.
Thus our Saviour, when notwithstanding
} all his .Mighty works, many would not be-
lieve in Him, but queftioned His Authority,;
and reviled His Perfbn, and blafphemed the
PJoly Spirir, by which they were wrought,
was not concerned to work more Miracles,
merely for the Satisfaction, or rather at the
captious Demands of thefe Men, when they re-
quired him to do it. For if they would be
convinced by any reafbnable ' Means, he had
given it them ; if they would not, it would
be to their own Prejudice, he was not folici-
tous what they thought of him. And thus it
is likewife in the Government of the World ;
God has given Men fufrkient Evidence of His
Being and Providence ; but if Men will dlfi
believe His Providence and deny His Being,
he doth not vouchfafe by any immediate and
particular 'A& of His Power to confute their
Pretences
l%6 The <%eafonabIene/s and Certainty
Pretences. And if, becaufe of fome places that
arc difficult in the Scriptures, Men will re-
ject the whole, rather than be at the pains to
fearch out the true Meaning of thefe places,
or than be fo modeft and humble, as to fup-
pofe that there may be ways of Reconciling
thofe, which appear to them, contradictions,
tho' they have not yet found them out, they
muft fall under the fame Condemnation with
thofe, who will deny the Being of God, if they
cannot fatisfy themfelves how he made and
governs the world; or with thofe that would
' believe none of our Saviour's Miracles, unlefs
he would work them when/ and where,
and juft in what manner they pleated. But
the wifdom of God fees that nothing would '
fatisfy thefe Men, and that they only tempt
God, and defign no real Satisfaction to them-
felves : and therefore he cannot be obliged to
new model the World, and alter the Scri-
ptures for their fakes,- fince there is enough
in them for the Satisfaction of all that are fin-
cere in their Enquiries after Truth.
II. The only way to judge rightly of the
particular places of any Book, is to confider
firft the whole Defign, and Contrivance, and
Method, and Stile of it, not to criticize upon
fome difficult Parts of it,w withoutany regard
had to the reft. This is the Method ufed by
all, who would criticize with Judgment upon
any Author. And fome PafTages of Scripture
are explained to our hands, to be a Key, as it
were,
of the Chriftian Religion. 187
were, and a Direction to us in the Explication
or others. Thus, whereas in one place it is
faid, that Jefus baptized, in another it is faid,
that he baptized not, and the former place is
expalined to be meant not of Baptifm perform-
ed by Himfelf, but by his Difciples, who
baptized in, his Name. Joh. iii. 22. iv« 1, 2. .
III. It is reafonable to obferve whether
the Objections be not fuch as do fuppofe Mis-
takes', which a Man, who could write fuch a
Difcourfe, as they are imagined to be found
in, could not run into. For if they be of •
this Nature, this very Consideration is enough
to take 'off the force of the Objection againft:
the Authority of any Book ; and we muft
conclude that the Objections are capable of
being anfwered, and that the Miftake lies not
in the Book it felf, but in the Readers, who
without fufficient Skill or Attention, pais a
rafh Judgment upon it. For by all the Rule*
of Reafoning, an Objection may imply too
much, as wdV as prove too little to be of
any force : And the common Rules of Candor
and Equity would prevent many Objections
which are wont to be made againft the Scri-
ptures. For if we will but fuppole the wri-
ters of the Scriptures to have been Men of any
tolerable Senfe, even, without Infpiration,
they could never have committed fuch miftakes
as fome would faften upon them. We read
Exod xxxiii. 1 1. And the Lord jf>ake unto Mo-
fes, face to faeey as a Man Jfeaketh unto hU
friend:
P
1 8 8 The ^eafonahlenefs and Certainty
Friend : yet Verf. 20. the Lord anfwers Mofes,
who had befought God to (hew him his Glory.
Thou canfi not fee my face : for there /hall no
man fee me and live. Would it not be impu-
dent Trifling to pretend any Contradiction in
thefe two Verfes, when they are eafily under-
ftood in a confident Senfe, and no Man of
any Judgment can be fuppofed to write Con-
tradictions, and lay them lb near together ?
When it is faid, Aft. ix. 7. that the Men, who
journeyed with St. Paul, heard a Voice s but
• faw no man: and Act. xxii. 9. that they heard
not the Voice of him that fpake to St. Paul : be-
sides the Explications which arc known and
obvious to reconcile thefe Texts, thole, who
who will not be at the Pains toconfult Expo-
sitors, or to con fid er the Importance of t*he
Words, may be pleafed to ob/erve, that St,
Luke was a Man bred to Learning, and this
Hiftory of the Acts of the Apoftles, fbews
him to have been, at lead, a prudent and wife
Man ; and therefore he conld never have writ-
ten fo palpable a Contradiction, as the Obje-
ction muft fuppofe, in fb fmall a Compafs, con-
cerning one of the raoft remarkable Things in
his whole Hiftory, relating to a Perfbn, with
whom he constantly travelled and convers'd.
I appeal to any Man, whether, if he had. met
wren two fuch Parages, which feem to con-
tradict each other, in Thucidides or Xenofhon^
or, even in the very worft Hiftorian, he would
not be enclined ratjier to leek out for fbmc
way
of the Chrifiian Religion. *8$
Way of reconciling them, than to fufpe£fc that i
he could fo foon forget what he had written
fo little a while before, in an Account of a»
Thing of that Nature. Of the fame kind is
that Difference, which is between the Genea-
logy of Chrift in St. Matthew, and that in St.
Luke. For there is no doubt but the Genealogies
of the Jems were then, and long after, extant in
the Publick Regifters,(x)they could repeat them (x)Abes:
by heart with as much readinefs as they^°uf^c
could their own Names ; and to infert a wrong adextre-
Genealogy had been to give up all the Argu- ""J"1^0"
ments that could be alledg'd for our Saviour's omnium
being the Chrift : Nothing could be more de- genera-
ftruttive to their Caufe, than for the Evange- ^mort*
lifts to produce a falfe Pedigree, when the tervelcci-
True one might be fo eafily produced by any ter(lue
who had a mind to difprove them. The Me- ?um\ut
rits of their Caufe wholly depended upon thee°sfuum
Proof of Chrift s Defcent from Abraham and ^^
David', and therefore whatever Difficulties men Hie-
there may now be thought to be in this Two- ~.n' i"
fold Genealogy; it was certainly acknow-
ledged by thofe of that Age, and beyond all
Difpute, or elle it would never have been pro-
duced by the Evangel ifts, or had for ever
ruined their Caufe, if they had produced it.
Some Crimes are too great to charge upon
Men of any Credit, or Reputation ; and fome
Errors are fo notorious that no Man of com-
mon Prudence can be fuppofed to commit
* them : And therefore when we find an Au-
thor
tqo The ^eafonablenefs and Certainty
thor rational and confident in other parts of
a Difcourfe ; the ordinary Ingenuity and Con-
dor of Mankind will hinder us rrom fuppb-
fing him to commit grofs and palpable mi-
ftakes, and it is great diflngenuity .and folly
to fhew the lefs Refp.d: to any Author, be-
caufe he is at lead believed to have written
by Infpiration, or to de-ny him the Refpeci
due t*o a Man, becaufe God has enabled him
to write Infallible Truth.
IV. Ir any Contradictions be framed cr
forced from the various Readings, the difficul-
ties in Chronology, or whatever elfe of this
Nature is to be found in the Difpurcs of
Criticks; they prove no more again ft: the
Authority of the. Scriptures, than they do a-
gainft the Authority of all other Books iri
the World, untefs it could be fhewn that
thefe Difficulties could not happen in a Book
written by Divine Infpiration, but that it
mud: be firfr. written in fuch a manner as to
afford no occafion for Difputes, and that it
rnuft: be ever after (b preferved by a conftant
Miracle, that it may be fubject to none of
the Accidents and Cafualties, to which all o-
ther Books are liable.^ On the contrary it can
never be proved that God might not permit
Books written by Infpiration, to be obnoxi-
ous to any fuch Cafualties as are not prejudi-
cial to the End and Defign of a Revelation-'
But if the neceffary points of Dotfrine be pre°
ferved entire, ancl the Evidence of Matters '
of
of the Chriftian G{eligion. tpt
of Fact be fufficient to prove the Truth of
the Miracles and Prophecies in Confirmation
of that Doctrine ; all lefler Matters may be
left to the fame contingencies which befall
all other Books in the World.
That the Evidence is very clear and full in
Proof both of the Prophecies and Miracles^
which demonftrate to us the Divine Autho-
rity of the Scriptures, has been already fhewn,
and if no more could be produced than has
by me been brought to prove their Authori-
ty ; yet unlefs this can be proved to be in-
fufrlcient from fome miftakes or defeds in it,
no fuch Obje&ions can invalidate it. Becaufe
no Man can prove that God might not fuffer
a Book written by his own Appointment and
Authority,, to be encumbred thro' length of
Time, and the frailty and negligence of Men,
with infupepable Difficulties, if it be fuppofed
ftill to retain the vifible Marks and Characters
of a Divine Original in all the Evidence necef»
fary to prove it from Matter of Faff, and in
the Dotfri/ies delivered by it. For as long
as thele two things are fecured, all the reft
tho* it be of never fb great Ule and Excellen-
cy, yet cannot be necefTary in order to the
ends of a Divine Revelation. And therefore
a Book of Divine Revelation might be per-
mitted by God for the Sins, and by the Fault
and Ignorance of Men, to become perplext
with abundance of divers Readings, and e-
ven with Contradictions in the Chronologic
Li 9 i We fyafonablenefs and Certainty
cal and lcfs material Points of it. For fo long
as it cannot be proved Defective as to the
ends and purpofes of a Divine Revelation, ei-
ther for want of evidence to make it appear
to be fuch, or thro' defect; of the Matter and
Doctrine contained in it ; all other Difficulties
will never prove it not to be of Divine Au-
thority, beca^ufe fo long as there is no Defect,
but what might be in any Book, tho' we fup-
pofe it to be of Divine Authority.
CHAP. IX.
Of the Creation of the World and
the Prefervation of it.
BY Creation in the Book of Genefis, is un-
deritood not only the Production of the
World out of Nothing, but the Formation
and Difpofal of the feveral Parts of the Uni-
verfe. But there has an Opinion of late years
prevailed, very injurious to Religion, and re-
pugnant to Reafon and the Judgment of for-
mer Ages; That God only created Matter
and gave it Motion, to Be performed under
certain Laws, by which all the Phenomena of
Nature both in the Creation and Prefervation
of Things are brought about, without any
fat-
of the Ckriftiah fylightu \i)i
farther immediate Divine Power or Concourfe,
than what is juft necefTary to continue this Mat«
ter and Motion in Being ; , that is, God created
Matter, and put it into Motion, and then
Matter ar d Motion do all the reft in a fettled
Courfe, and by eftablifhed Laws, without any
need of the Divine Aid or Dire&ion, . This
Notion indeed can never be reconciled to the
Scriptures, but then it is as little befriended by
Reafon and Natural Religion. In proof of
which, I fhall confider : I. The Creation of
the World, II. The Prefervation of it ; and
fhall (hew, that neither of them could be per-
formed in this way. r
L As to the Creation, we may confider
both the Time and the Manner of it. And by
the Time of the Creation, we may underftand
either the Time, when the Creation of the
World began, or, the Time which was taken
up in the Creation of it. But this latter (enle
Will come under what is to be faid of the
Manner of the Creation. . vV
i . The Time of the Creation of the World^
as that fignifies the Beginning of, Time, or
of the Worlds Duration, rauft be wholly Ar-
bitrary, and ablblutely at God's Sovereign
Pleafure and Difpofal. For there could bp nor-
thing in eternal Duration to fix the Creation of
the World more to one Time than another* or.
todetermin why it fhould begin fooner or later*
And fince it is impoflible that the world fhoylcjl
fee eternal^ it is evident* that th« Time of t(ifl
0 $t*
194 The Q{eafonablenefs and Certainty
Creation, whenever it was, can be no good
Objection, becaufe, tho' the World had been
created never fo long before, there muft ne-
ceflarily have been as much a Pretence for
fuch an Objection. For there muft haye been
fome Period of Time, when the World had
exifted no longer than it has done now : and
no beginning of the World can be fuppofed
fo long ago, but ftill it might with the fame
Reafon be ask'd, why it was not created
fboner ?
2. In confideringthe Manner of the Worlds
Creation, I fhall prove, (i.) That there is
no Reafon to fuppofe the World to have been
at the flrft made by Mechanical Laws, tho' it
were prefecy'd according to fuch Laws. ( 2. )
That there are fufficient Reafbns to be given
for its Creation in that Manner, which we
find related in the Book of Genefis.
(1.) There is no Reafon to fuppofe the
World to have been at flrft made by Mecha-
nichal Laws, tho' it were preferved according
to fuch Laws ( whereas I fhall afterwards
prove, that it is not preferved according tc*
them. J There is no Reafon that the World
fhould be firft framed according to the Laws
of Motion which are eftablifhed for its Prefer-
vation and Government in its fixt and fettled
State. The Origin of the Univerfe was by the
immediate hand of God, before the Appoint-
ment of the feveral Laws which afterwards
. were to take place ; and we may as well en-
dea-
of the Chrifiidn ^etigionl \gi
deavour to reduce the working of Miracles to
the (landing Laws of Nature as the Creation
of the World. For certainly of all Mirtcles
the Creation of the World muft be the great-
eft, not only as it (ignifies the Production of
Matter and Motion out of Nothing,but as it was
the putting things into fuch Order, as to make
them capable of the Laws of Motion ordain-
ed for them. It is not yet agreed, nor is it
ever like to be, what thefe Laws of Motion
are, which the Philofbphers lb much talk ofj
and there being fuch a mutual Connexion and
Combination of Bodies, and fuch a Dependancc
of every Body upon fb many others in every
Motion, it is impoffible to know how any
two Bodies would act upon each other, if
they were feparate from all Bodies befides, or
were out of that State which they now are
in. It is reafonable therefore to imagine,
that the feveral Parts of the World muft be
ranged and fettled before thefe Laws could
take place; and to reduce the Creation of
the World to the Laws of Motion which
now prevail in it, is to luppofe a Creation
antecedent to that by which the World . was
made. This is as if an Indian fhould attempt to
give an Account of the making of a Watch by
the feveral Motions, which he fees performed
in it after it is made, and fhould imagine that
the Materials moving in fuch a manner, at
laft arrived to the exact frame of a Watch. .
(i>) There are fufficient Reafons tobej
• 6' i given"
I j> 6 The ^afonahlenefs and Certainty
given for the Creation of the World in that
manner, which we find related in the Book
of Genefis. It is great Preemption in Men to
be too curious and inquifitive about the Rea-
fons of God's Actions : for whatever he delivers
of himlelf, we ought entirely to believe both
the Thing it felf and the manner and Cir-
cumftances of it.. Where ivalf thou when I laid
. the Foundations of the Earth, declare, if thou
haH Under Handing- Job. xxxviiu 4. But this
muft be faid to the Glory of God, and to the
Shame of all fuch as Cenfure and Cavil at
his Word, that even by Men fuch Reafons
may be given of his Aclions, as all his Ad-
verfaries fhall not be able to gain-fay.
God hath ordered all things tn Meafure, and
Number, and Weight, Wifd. xi. 20. And as to
thofe who enquire, why the World was created
in fix days rather than in one day, or in an in*
ftant, or in a long compafs of Years, as the
Law9 of Matter and Motion, they fay, require :
It might be fufficient to ask, why, if it was
God's Will, the World might not be created
in fix Days, as well as in any other number of
Days or fpace of Time? If the Creation had
been in an Inftant, or in a longer or fhorter
fpace of Time, the Queftion might with as
much Reafbn have been put, .why it was not
created in fix days? Shall Men prefume to
prefcribe to God the Time and Manner of his
Actions? Is not his own Pleafure a fufficient
Rcafon of them ? The Manner of the Crea-
tion
of the Cbriftian Religion. i y?
tion and of the Flood, which have of late
been the Subject of fo many Difputes, depends
ibldly upon the Will and Pleafure of God, and
therefore we can know only by Revelation,
how they were effected, and it is in vain to pre-
tend that they muft have come to pafs in this
or that Manner, unlels it could be prov'd,
that God could not bring them to pals any
other way than that, which the Inventor of ■
fome Hjpotbefts thinks fit to propofe. Mori:
Actions may be performed very different ways ;
and if, for inftance, we had only a general ac-
count of the PafTage of the Jfraelites out of
&Vf* *nto tne Land of Canaan ; that Pharaoh
purfuing them, was drowned with his whole
Army 5 that they travell'd in the Wildernefs
forty Years, and had a fufficient Provision of
Food, and Cloathing, and Water for fb great
a Multitude, in fb barren a place, and for fo
long a time : tho* never fo many Conjectures
fhould be made, how all this might be, and
never fb many Schemes were drawn of their
Journeyings and Encampments ; if it could be
fuppofed poffible, that one of all thefe might
prove true, yet it would be utterly impoflible
tp know which were it. But when we are on-
ly told, that God created the World in fix days,
and that fqch and fuch things were created
on each of thefe Days, that he brought a De-
luge of y Vater's upon the whole Earth for the
Sms of Mankind; which continued for fuch a
time upon the face' of the Earth ^fom^ */:■*:;
:' ' * ;" O i will,
i P 8 The ^eafonahlenefs and Certainty
will needs aflign the particular Means and
Manner, by which both the Creation and the
Flood muft necefTarily have been brought to
pafsj as if the wifdom and power of God,
and the nature of things could admit of no
other way, but what they can explain. We
may efteem the Learning, and admire the Sa-
gacity, and allow the good Intentions of thefe
• Authors; but when any oneadvanceth an Hy-
pothecs in contradiction to all others, and pro-
jpofes it, not as probable, but as the only true
Explication of Scripture, and pofitively main-
tains, riot only that things might be lb, if God
pleafed, but that they were fb, and could not be
Otherwife ; this to me feems more unaccount-
able, than any thing I ever met with befides,
in the very worft Hypothecs. We can know
nothing of the way and manner how God has
been pleafed to do any thing but by his o^n
Revelation. If each Hy pot hefts were poflibte,
yet no man could be certain which were the
right, or that any of them were fb ; becaufe
God might make ufe of fome other Means
than what Men can imagine. But when the
feveral Hypothecs dcftrby one another, and
every one pretends to fet up his own in con-
tradiction to all the reft, and none can main-
tain its Ground any longer than till another
has been brought to confute it, it were ftrange,
if Men fhould fatisfy themfelves with fuch
Uncertainties, rather than with the plain word
of God, > • ■ ■ ■ * ■
Accor-
of the Chrijlian Religion. 199
According to any Mechanical Hypothecs ,
( tho* there were no Vtcutm ) fb many Acci-
dents muft continually intervene in a Chaos of
Matter confufedly rolling and knocking one
part of it againft another, that it feems next
to an Impoffibility, that it fhould ever fettle
into any Order : at leaft, if Matter had been
left to its own workings and jumblings accord-
ing to any Mechanical Laws gf Motion, the
world for ought any Man can prove, might
not have been made to this" Moment. So far
is it from being poflible to underftand, how,
upon Mechanical Principles, the world fhould
have been made in fix Years, rather than in fix
Days, confiding of four and twenty Hours.
It is therefore the bolder! Attempt that can be
conceived for Men to pretend to aflign the fe-
veral (reps and degrees in the procefs of this
wonderful Operation, with as much eafe and
certainty, as if they had all the Materials by
them in their Laboratory, and could perform it
as readily as an ordinary courfe of Chymiftry.
Next to attempt the making of a world, what
undertaking can be more daring than to pre-
tend to difcover how it was made? To make
a World muft undoubtedly be the work of
God, and he alone can declare how he made
it. But Reafons may be given for the Crea-
tion of the world in fix Days; (i.J With
Refpeft to Angels, ( 2. ) With Refpecl: to
Men?
O 4 With
too The (Reafonablenefs and Certainty
' j. WithRelpeft to the Angels. It isf»J}
ft&.ito'St. Aufiins Opinion, that the fix Days of the
ddu'tera*. Creation of the World in the Book of Genefis%
J* & '• are diftinguiftied according to the Pei ception
jhcmu which the Angels had of the Creation ; from
ptiiib. whence was framed that Diftindion of the
V(b) TboXb) Schoolmen between Cognitio AUti<ti»ayand
jfu*. Cognitio Vejpertina. And tho' what I am about
sum. t'"io {ay, is not, exactly agreeable to St. Aujlins
irrV 'Notion, yet I hope his Authority will war-
rant my arguing from this Topick to fuch as
.may think it new and lingular.
The Angels. were the beginning of the
Creation, and were created probably in the
Morning of the firftDay. For in the Book of Job',
God fays, that when the Foundations of the
Earth were laid,/j&* Morning Stars fang together,
and all the Sons of God jhouted for Joy* Jub
xxxviii. 7. from whence we learn that the An-
gels were created before this vifible World,
and glorified God for his creating it. Now
the Angels, tho* bleffed and glorious Spirits,
yet are finite, and are unable to comprehend
and fathom the wonderful works of God ;
there are things which the Angels deftre to"
look into, 1 Pet. 1. 12. and the more they
know of God and his Works, the more they
adore and praife Him. The whole Scene of
the Creation feems to have been laid open in
Order before them, according to the feveral
Degrees and the various Natures of things,
whereby they mull have had a fuller View and a
» clear-
of the Chr'ifiiantyligion. 20 1)
clearer Underftanding of the Divine Power
and Wifdom, than they could have had, if
the World had ftarted forth in an Inftant, and
jump'd, as it were, into this beautiful Frame
and Order. As he who fees the whole Me-
thod and Contrivance of any Curious piece of
Art, values and admires the Artift more than
one does, that beholds it in Grofs. God was
pleaied therefore to difplay his Glory before
the Angels, and by feveral fteps and degrees,
to excite their Praife, and Love, and A-
doration, which moved them to Songs and
Shouts of Joy, and by this means his Glory
and their own Happinefs was advanced, much
beyond what it would have been, if all things
had been created and difpofed into their Rank
and Order at one Moment. They look'd into
the ftrft Principles and Seeds of Things, and
every day prefented them with a glorious Spe-
ctacle of New Wonders ; the firft Seven Days
of the World, they kept a continual Triumph
or Jubile ; and thus their Voices were tuned
and raifed, as I may fay, to thofe Praifes,
which were to be their Employment and their
Happinefs to all Eternity ; the more they law,
the more they knew, and the more they knew
of the Works of God, the more they for ever
loved and adored Him.
This affords us a Reafon, why fb much
more time was fpent in the forming of the
Earth, and the Creatures belonging to it, than
in the formation of the Heavenly Bodies. Be-
caufe
Jot The %jafonabIene/s and Certainty
caufe the Heavens are fef a Uniform and Si
milar Nature, and a vaft Vacuum is now fup
pofed to be in them, and therefore the Na-
ture of them might, without any fucceffivc
Production, be difplayed at once to the An-
gels ; but the Earth being of a Compound
Nature and containing Creatures of very dif
ferent kinds, it required more time to give
a diftincl: perception of the feveral Parts and
$pecies of it. And the Planets being of the
like Nature with the Earth, fince the Earth,
!the Seat of Man's Habitation was framed by
fuch leifurely degrees, as might give a fuita-
ble Idea of it ; the other Planets might be
framed at once, there being nothing more in
them than what was obferveable in the For-
mation of the Earth, or they might be fra-
med together with the Earth by the fameMea.
lures and Degrees.
But according to the Mechanical way the
Angels would have only the ProfpecT: of a
vaft. Chaos, rolling and working for many
thoufands of years, perhaps before any thing
confiderable could have been framed out of
jt : And thofe tedious delays muff, yet accor-
ding to this Notion have been carried on by
fuch certain Methods, that there could have
been little wonderful in it to an Angel, when
the Mechanical Philofophers themfelves think
they can point out the feveral Steps and Moti-
ons, by which all was done.
The making of Man was the laft and fi-
ll iih-
of the Cbriftian Religion. * 305
pifhing Work of the Creation, when the
World was prepared for the Reception of
him, and he was made with much folemnity.
Let us make Man in out Image after our Like' (ODicunt
fief Gen-L 26. and the Man and the* Wo-^^
man were made apart. For Adam was Cre- /n, e)VA \*
ated with all the Perfections fuitable for him,dem effe
both as a, Man, and as the firft Man, out of nam ex
whom Eve was to be formed: As Man hepartibuse-
was to have all the Parts and Faculties which ius» velu"
Men have now, but in greater Perfection ; tem tps
as the firft Man, he was befides to have a l^quamex-
or (e) Part, out of which the Woman was^'Jf j°"nw
to be made. Which being the ' Principal, firmant
and, as it were, the feminal Matter, no men- e* *°.
tion is made of ariy other; but as Animals Targum
and Pmnts are properly (aid to come fromvocabu- ,
the Seed, tho' they are not made of that on- |"f CS?
ly; fb Eve was properly made of Jdams redditur
Rib, tho' other Matter befides might go to J£r/7/X
her Compofition. This way of Formation cofta^rL
was to betoken that Love and Duty which bernaculi
ought to be between Husband and Wife, f^rf
And as the Creation and Happinefs of Man gum per
provoked the Envy of Evil Angels, fb no f^^
doubt it occafioned the Joy and Praife of theCuii; ita
Good ones. hic dicunt
(2.) By this fucceflive and Gradual Produ- SX
t"Hon and Difpofition of things in fix days at quod m$:
the Creation ; the Glory of God is likewife f^'^e
more manifefted to Men than it would have Nevoch.
been, if all had been done at once, or by Part a <=•
flow309
1Q4 The ^eafonahknefs and Certainty
flow and tedious Methods. This gives Us a
more clear and diftind comprehenfive Notioq
of the Works of God than we could other-
y^ife have had. It is acknov/ledged, that
Mofes has given fuch an Account of the Cre-
ation, as is more intelligible and better ada-
pted to the .Capacities of the generality of
Men, than that which any one would now
obtrude upon us as a true Account of it:
But whatever Reafons can be affigned why
the Creation fhould be defcribed as it. is in
the Book of Gene (is ; the fame Reafons will
prove (hat it was fitting it fhould be fo per-
formed : If it be more fuitable to the Capacir
ties and Apprehenfions of Men, that the Cre-
ation of the World fhould be delivered to us
as finifhed in fix days rather than in* a lefs
or a longer time ; it was fit that it fhould
have been really finifhed in this fpace of
. time, and fhould be indeed fo performed as
might make the Hiftory the more ufeful to
us. For in refpedt. of God it was alike t,o
Create all things in an inltanr, or to do i£
fucceffryely in a fhorter or a longer time ;
and in refpccl of Mankind no reafon can be
aligned why the Hiftory of the Creation
fhould be delivered fo as to reprefent it
to Men as performed in this manner ; but the
fame -Reafon will hold why it fhould have
been in the fame manner performed.
God Btejfed the Seventh day And Santfified
//, bcGAufe iij.it in it be had rejied from all his
Work
of the Chrijiian fyligioti 305
Work which God Created and Made, Gen* ii. j^
and fd, Exod. xx. 10, it. the Obfervation of
the Sabbath; Or of one day in Seven to the
Honour of God, is eftablifhed upon the Worlds
being Created in fix days, and therefore, if it
be reafonable to keep one day in Seven Ho^
!y in Remembrance of the Creation, it muft
be reafonable that the Creation of the World
fliould have been performed in fix days, fince
the Obligation to obferve a Seventh day in re-
membrance of the Creation, implies that God
refted on the Seventh day after he had Crea-
ted the World in Six, or in the fame fpace
of time, which is contained in fix days.
God faw it fitting that a day fhould be fet
apart to Commemorate the Creation, and* to
Praife him for all his wonderful Works, and
that this day fhould return at fuch a diftanoe
of time ; and he obferved fuch Order in the
Creation, that every day between thefe Peri-
ods of time might bring fbme particular work
of it to Remembrance, and every Seventh
day might conclude in the Commemoration of
the whole Creation.
Our Saviour anfwers the Pharifees, when
they propofed the Queftion to him about Di»
vorces, by putting them in Mind of the Or-
der, which God ufed in the Creation, Have
ye not read that he which made them at the be-
ginning made them Male and Female ? Andjaid^
for this caufe {ball a Man leave Father and Afo-
ther, and {ball cleave te hit Wife: and they
twain
Jo6 *«* ^eajonablenefs dnd Certainty
twain [had be one Flefb? Matth. xix. 4*
5. And St. Pa/U'm like manner, to fbew that
the Woman ought not to ufurp Authority 0
ver the Man, proves it by this Argument :
For Adam rvas firfi formed, then Eve. 1 Tim*
ii. 13. and in another place and upon another
occafion he obferves, that the Man is not of
the Woman, but the Woman of the Man. 1 Cor.
xi. 8. And long before the Prophet Malachi
had Argued from the fame Topick, Malach. ii.
15. AndHebr. iv. 4. it is noted, that God did
reft the Seventh day from all his Works, from
wflence the Apoftle concludes, that he that is
entred into his reft, he alfo hath ceafed from his
own Works , as God did from his, Verf 10. Now
as thele and whatever other Arguments are
to be found in the Scriptures of the like Na-
ture, do evidently fuppofe the Creation of the
World in the fame manner, as it is related
in the Book of Genefis ; fo they explain to us
the Reafbns why it was thus Created. For
all thefe Arguments had been loft, and there
could have been no ground for them, if tha
World had been otherwile created. As cer-
tainly therefore, as this Arguing from the man-
ner of the Creation is good : So certain it is,
both that the World was fo Created, and
that there was great Reafon for it.
But whatever fome Philifophers may think
now, there is nothing which would have been
more difegreeable to the Notions of the Ge-
nerality of the wifeft Men in all Ages, than
. that?
of the Cbrijlian [Religion. Jo>*
that the World fhould be made upon Media*
nical Principles. He jpake> and it was done,
be commanded, and it flood fa&y Pfal. xxxiii. g*
He Commanded and they were Created. Pfal.
Cxlviii. 5. This expreffes not only the Truth
of the Hiftory but the general fenfe of Man-
kind, who have ever had this Notion of God,
that to command and to do is the fame thing
with him. And therefore the Objection till
of late has run the other way, that God did
rather Create the World, in an inftant than in
fix days.. It was little fufpe&ed formerly
that divers Years or many Ages were fpent
in the Creation. It was in the Defcription of
the Creation of the World thsxLonginm ob-
ferved the fublime Style of Mofes, and if the
Relation of it be admirable, the Creation it
(elf in fuch a manner as is there related, ^uft
be much more admirable. For it is proper for it
to be thus defcribed,for no other Reafbn, but be-
caufe it was proper for it in this manner to be
done. But what would Longinus have laid, if the
Creation had been related to have been perform*
ed not by any command which had its immediate
efFe£r, but by the tedious Procefs of* Mechanical
Caufes? What Grandeur, what evidence of
the Divine Power and Majefty is there in
this more than in any Chymical Operation,
if the Mechanical Hypothecs were true ?
It were ftrange Prefumption to demand
of Almighty God a Reafon of all his A&ions,
and not to believe him upon his Word, that
he has done any thing, but when and how
^ fbme
5b8 The fydfonabknefs and Certainty
fbme Men conceit it ought to have been done.
But what I have now faid may at Jeaft ferve
to filence the Cavils of fuch Men.
2. The Prefervation of the World is not
performed according to Mechanical Laws or
Principles.. The Mechanical Hypothecs fuppo-
fes that Bodies a£r. upon Bodies, or Actives
upon Pafiives in a certain courfe, and accord-
ing to fuch Laws as that, being left to them*
felves, they neceffarily produce their ErTetts
without any immediate Interpofition of a Di-
vine Power. But this Notion is grounded
wholly upon miftakes.
i. It fuppofes that there was at firft a cer-
tain quantity of Motion infufed or impreffed
Upon Matter which Mill continues palfing
from one Body to another according to cer-
tain Methods . or Rules prefcribed. But this
Suppofition that there is always the fame
Quantity of Motion in the World is wholly
precarious, or rather notcriouily falfe, and the
beft Philofbphers have been able to give no
Account how Motion can be Communicated
without an immediate Impiilfe or Concouffe
of the Divine Power. %'•■'-*.
2. By the Mechanical Hypothefis ft is fup-
poled as a thing certain, that there is a P/h
nnnt, which at lead: is very uncertain; '., or
rather it has been demonftrated by Mr. AVnr-
torty that there is a Vaumm not only interfper*
led, but of a Prodigious and almoft incredi-
ble extent at the diftance of the Earths Sim>
diame-
of the Chrijlian $eUgioii? i$A
diameter from us. And by his Principles, Gra-
vitation muft proceed from an immediate and
conftant Impreflion or Impulfe of God*. For
it proceeds from no Action of one Body, up.-
on another, but is a Quality belonging to all
Matter alike, and to every particle of Matter*
however (eparate and diftant from all . others.
The Projectile Motibn, and that Attract ivt
Force* by which the Planets are carried in
their Orbits cannot be communicated or per-
formed according to any Mechanical Laws*
whereby they are determined from a RecJiliflear
to art •OrUculat Motion; For Bodies can a<S
upon Bodies only by Contract j and therefore
cannot Communicate their Motionf or any
way detcrmin, or affect .the Motion of each
other in a Vacuum, (b vaft as it muft be near,
the Circumference of the feyeral Orbits, (b
that the old occult Qualities and Subftantiai
Terms were not more repugnant to the Mecha-
nical Hyfothefis than thefe Principles are* The
being of a Vacuum muft fuppofe . an imme-
diate Divine Power neceffary to keep the
Syftem of the World in that order in
which we fee it continue^ For ptherwife
by this Principle of Gravitations^ being inne*
rent in every Part of Mattery all Bodies
would prels towards the Center, and in a Va-
cuum there can be nothing to hinder their
tendency towards it> till they come crowding
one upon another ; (b that all the Order of
things would (bon be reduced to one confofed
r
2, i o The Q(cii[onablenefs and Certainty
Heap or Mofs, unlefs fome immaterial Power
ihterpofed to hinder it.
It is evident then that the Mechanical Hy-
pothefis is quite destroyed by thefe Principles.
For by thefe here is no Connexion of Cau-
ics and Effects according to any Laws of
mere Matter and Motion ; but all muft be
done by the immediate Power of God, Gra-
vitation and the Projectile Motion muft be im-
prwfled and fufpended without any dependance
upon lurrounding Bodies ; they muft produce
their Effects thro' prodigious void Spaces,
where Bodies have no Communication of
Motion from one to another. And all being
performed by the immediate directing and affi-
fting Hand of God, ^ Man may as well pre-
tend to fclve a Miracle Mechanically, as
to give any Account of the Phenomena of Na-
ture by Mechanical Laws according to thefe
Principles.
3. The Abetters of the Mechanical Hypo-
r'.ciis argue, that God acts in the moft Gene-
ral and Uniform ways, that it i9 more becom-
ing his Wifdom to let Nature have its courfe,
and that conilantly to interpofe, would be a
difparagementto the Order and Contrivance
in his Hftablifhment of the Laws of Motion ;-
rhat Matter and Motion are with that Wif-
do>-n fet to work, that they can perform aU
without any more than preferving and fuftain-
ing them in their Being and Operations; and
fliat he is the belt Artift, who can contrive
air
of tk CtJriflian fyflgkni % jj jf
an Engine that flull need the lead medling
with, after it is made. Hut it ought to be con-
(tdered, what the Nature o( the. Engine is,
and whatthe ends and ufetof ii ; ij
the Nature of u be fuch, that it ( tfn*
Iwer the ends tor which it was framed with*
out foirietimcs an affifting Hand) it would be
no point ot Wjiilom in the Artificer, tor the
Credit of his Contrivance) to k>fe the mod'
iitct'ul Ends defign'd by it. As if ampng o-
• thcr uics this curious Engine Were dcli.'jul to
reward the Good and punilh bad Meq tore-
move the punifhment apon Amendment, and
to renew it upon a Relapfe: Sine ■ Brute
Matter is uncapablc of varying its 'Motion,
and (utting it felt' to die teveral Stales and
Changes of Free Agents, he mutt affifl it
unlets he will loft the Chief end for .vhich
it is to ftrve. It is no delect, in the Skill
and Wiidom of the Almighty; that Matter
and Motion have no! tree will as Men ha\
But it would be a great defecl in his Wift
dom, not to make them the Inftrumcnts
of Rewards and Punifhment, becaftfc it is
impotTible for them of themfelves to apply
ami tiiir themfelves to the ftveral ! and
Conditions of Free Agents.
The Nature ot Matter and Moti ^:h,
• that they cannot Icrvc all the Defi jns > then
Creator without his InterppOtion, u\ 1 there-
fore lie conftantly doth interpofe accord .!-,
tf'cernm Tenour which he has pre t(
p a hvi
til 77* ^eafondllenefs and Certainty
himfelf; but this Tenour and Courfe is alter-
ed upon fome important Occafions. In a
natural and ordinary way he Cures Difeafes,
fends Rain or dry Weather, or elfe our Prayers
to him would be infignificant upon fuch Occafi-
ons, and there would be no room left for his
inflicting thefe Temporal Rewards and Pu-
nifhments. He feeds the IJungry that cry
to him, ancj he pumfhes the Wicked when
he fees it fitting, by Famine, or Drought,
or Peftilence, in the ordinary Methods of hts«
Providence. But fometimes he alters thele
ordinary Methods, and a£ts above them or
contrary to them, to fignalize his Mercy or his
Judgments: And thus Chnft fed ib many
thousands in the Wildernefs, and God Rained
down Fire from Heaven upon Sodom and Go-
morrah by a particular and miraculous Dik
penfation. Miracles are the particular Ap-
pointment of God in peculiar Cafes and Oc-
cafions, and the courfe of Nature is his ge-
neral and perpetual Appointment at all other
times. God at no time leaves Nature to it
ielf, but ever concurs with it, by affifting its
Power and directing its courfe,he ordinarily in*
terpofes in the conftant courfe of Things ac-
cording to eftablifhed Laws: But Miracles
arc his wonderful Work, when he interpofes in
* an extraordinary manner, and alters that Me- 9
tliod which he has prescribed to himfelf to
fclfeive in the cemmon courfe of Nature.'
! Ccd c'oth not in an extraordinary manner in-
v ter-
of the Cbriflidn Religion] % j j
terpofe to prevent the irregular or unufaal^
productions of Nature as in moftrous Births,
&c. For how irregular fbever thefe may feem,
yet they are according to this (landing Rule,
that they fhall be differed to happen in cer-
tain Cafes ; and they rarely happening, ferve
to illuftrate the Divine Wifdom in contriving
Nature, fb that in its general Courfe all its
Operations fhould be* regular and uniform ;
and from hence it appears that God doth not
extraordinarily interpofe to alter the Courfe of
Nature, but for great Ends, Superiour to thofe
which concern only the material World. '
We may well fuppofe that God has as
much regard to his Wifdom in his Govern-
ment of the Moral, as of the Material Part of
the Creation; and yet he has added fupple-
mental Laws to enforce the Moral Laws, and
thefe additional Laws have been changed, as
the Circumftances and Condition of Men re-
quired. Why then fhould the Laws of the
Material World be fb much more facred, as
that he fhould never intermeddle with them ?
He aflifts Moral Agents with the continual
fupplies of his Grace, and natural Agents with
that help which is needful for them to per-
form his will. God may hafteu and aflift
natural caufes upon our Prayers, he may quick-
en the Motions and enforce the Powers of
Nature, and remove fecret Impediments, to
help and make way for natural Operations^
or he may flacken or retard risttutai Caufes.
P I To
The (Reafonablenefs and Certainty
To fay that God has fo ordered the courfe
of Nature as upon the fore-fight of Mens Pray-
ers to him, to grant them what they Pray
for, and upon the fore-fight that they will not
Pray, to withhold from them what they want
by Mechanical Laws, is by no means fatisfa-
£fcory. For there is neither Proof nor poflibi-
lity of Proof of it, it is merely a Suppofition
without any ground of Reafon, but only this,
that the Mechanical Notion cannot otherwife
be maintained. But I will fuppofe with much
snore Reafon, that two Men are Sick of the
fame Difeafe, that the Circumftances of the
Difeafe are all the fame, and all outward Ac-
cidents likewife the fame, till the Prayers of
one of them make a Difference, tor one of
thefe Men upon his Prayers Recovers, the o*
ther neglecting to Pray, Dies. The natural
Caufes are fuppofed to be the fame, except-
ing only fo far as Prayer moves God in his
Mercy to make a Difference in their Cafe. To
Jay that this never happened, is wholly precari-
ous, and hard to . believe, fince it probably
may often happen in Ejfidemical Diftempers *,
but it is much harder to believe that it can
never happen ; and if this either have or can
happen, it is not upon fore-fight of their Pray-
ers, by the contrivance of Mechanical Laws in
their firrt Eftablifhment, but by an immediate
.AcT^ that God afnfts Men upon their Prayers to
him. The itrange Providential Deliverances
of fome certain Perfons are obferyable in every
Age
of the Chriftian Religion. % \ j
Age, and all Hiftories mention them. Bat how
fhall particular Men, amidft the greateft Dan-
gers, be preferved in the common Calamities
of the Sword, and Famine, and Peftilence,
but by a particular interpofing Providence?
Were tfiefe Men who have been To remarkably
prelerv'd all of one Conftitution ; or do Soldiers
Slay Mechanically, tho' the Plague and Famine
fhould be fuppofed to do fb? I wonder it
fhould be thought lefs agreeable to Philofbphy,
for God to interpofe in directing natural Cau-
fes than in over-ruling Moral Agents, where
theDefignsof the Providence equally require it..
The fame Providence delivers both from the
fnare of the Hunter and from the noifqme YJeJiilcme.
A thoufand [hall fall he fides theef and ten thou-
fand at thy Right Hand, hut it jhall not come
nigh thee, Pfai. xci. 5.7.
4. The Mechanical Philofbphy proceeds up-
on a wrong Notion of God, fuppofiog it un-
worthy of him to be concerned immediately
in every thing which is done. We may as
well imagine it below him to know' every
thing, as to fuppofe it unworthy of him to
concern himfelf in it: And yet he cannot bu:
know every thing being Oninilctent, and he can-
not but concur in every Operation of natural
Caufes, being Omniprefent, and wherever he
is, he Ads. It is the Perfection of the Eye ,
to fee all that is within View, how final] and
inconsiderable foever it be ; nay, the miaffer
the Object dilcerned is, the more perfect it
P 4 proves
TIj* ^eafonablenefs and Certainty
proves the fight to be ? And if a Man could
do every little" thing at the fame time that he
does things of Importance, and with no trou>
fcle to hirnfelf, it would be (urely more per-
fection iti him than to do thefe only. But a.
Variety of bufinefs is troiiblefome to Men,
§nd fmall Affairs hinder and call them off
from thofe of moment, Tho' with God it is
quite otherwise ; he a&s with the fame Eafe
\yherewith he fees or knows or exifts ; he
knoW$ all things with qne Omnifcient Thought,
and he does all things by one omnipotent A£r,
Tipthing can be in the le^ft difficult to him,
and nothing can be done without him, in
fiim we live and move and have our Being. Act,
xvii. 28. And what the Scripture delivers re-
lating to the Creation and Prelervatioh pf the
World, may in ftri&nefs of Philofophy be
taken in a proper and litteral Senfe. But do
Men indeed ccnfider what it is to make and
preferve a World, when they pretend to fhe w
by what fteps God proceeds in it, and to ex-
plain the vyhole Procefs, as it were, of the Ope-
ration ? Is there not infinite Wifdom requi-
red to Hnow what infinite Power only can ef-
fect?
And after all, it is yery probable both from
■Scripture and from Reafon, that the invifible
and* immaterial part of the Creatiop has a
greater Share in the guidance and conduct of
the yifible and material part of it, than is
commonly fuppofed. For fince tlii Wonder-
ful
of the Chrijiian Religion. iijr
ful improvement of experimental Philofophy,
and the various tiypthefes which have been
raifed upon it; Men have been apt to look
upon natural Philofophy not only as a diftinft
Science, but as wholly feparate from the reft,
Ss if there were, no fubordination and depen-
dance between the vifible and invifible World;
whereas it is reafonable to believe that there
is a continued Connexion and Chain of Cau-
les in the Operations and Productions of
things, and a conliant influence and intercourle
between the Superior and Inferior Created Be-
ings. It is certain that God ufeth the Mi-
jniftry of Angels in the Government of the
World, but how far, and to what particular
purpofes, and upon what occafions, no Man is
able to determine : However, thoie who have
been the moft curious inquirers into Nature,
daily meet with fo many new and ftrange Di-
fcoveries, that they have been forced to com>
plain, that the contrivers of fypotbtfes have
been too hafty in framing them without a
fufficient number of Experiments; from whence
we may conclude, that if Men will firft con-
tent themfelves to make Experiments in or-
der to give a true Hiftory of the ¥h*nomcn&
of Nature before they attempt to folve them
upon their own Principles, the World will
have an end before any' compleat Syftem can
be contrived to give any tolerable Account of .
them.
I will conclude -this Chapter in the Words
with,
% 1 8 The <$ea/bnablenejs and Certainty
with which M. Huygens concludes his Conje*
ftures concerning the Planetary Worlds. For
my part, fays he, I [ball be very well contented,
and (hail count I have done a great matter, if I
can but come to any knowledge of the Nature of
things as they now are, never troubling my Head
about their Beginning, or how they were made,
Icnowing That to be out of the reach of Humane
l(jtowledge9 or even Conjecture.
CHAR X.
Of other Habitable Worlds be-
Jides this Earth.
THofe who think that there muft be other
Worlds inhabited befides this Earth,
where we dwell, or that elfe the Planets
would be ufelefs, and the Stars, which are like
fo many Suns; would fhine tp little purpofe,
do not confider, that
J. It is as eafy for Omnipotence to make a
Planet or Star, as it is to make the lead thing
in Nature.
II. The Glory of God Almighty in mani-
fefting his Power and Wifdom, by making
and preferving fuch vaft Bodies in their feveral
Orbs and Motions may be a fufficient Reafon
for
of the Chrlflian Religion. $1 •
for their Creation, tho' his Wifdom fhould
fee it fit not to have them inhabited. For tho*
every thing.be equally eafy for God to per-
form, yet men are apt to admire the Works
of this kind moft. They employ the Wits of
many Men in all Ages to confider their End
and Nature, and to calculate their Diftances
and Motions, whofe Curiofity might other-
wile be very ill employed : there are fbme Ge-
nius's defign'd, as it were, for thefe Studies,
and they would want Matter to work upon
without fuch Objects.
III. As the Satellites of Jupiter and Sa-
turn, and many of the fixt Stars were notdif*
covered, till the Invention of Telefcopes ; (b
there are admirable Marks of Wifclom in ma-
ny other Parts of Nature, which were never
known till of late, aiid never could have been
difcovered, but by tne help of Mycrofcopes.
But Men are not the only Creatures, which
are capable of praifing and magnifying God
for his wonderful W^orks : Angels, who know
them more perfectly, do it much more ; and
they have need of no Artificial Inftruments
to make Difcoveries of the Divine Wifdom
and Power.
IV. The Stars may be ef great Benefit and
Ufefulnefs in the World^ tho* they neither have
that Influence which Aitrologers vainly fup-
pofe, nor are as Suns to other Earths: For
they ferve to keep the circumjacent Air or JE-
ther in Motion, which ether wile would con»
&e
21
% %o 5T5* %edfon4b/enefs and Certainty
geal or ftagnate ; and to maintain that per-?
petual Circulation or Fluid Matter, which paP
Fes from Orb to Orb, through the Univerfe,
and gives Life to all Things.
V» Tho' this Earth be but finall in compa-
nion of the Ambient Heavens ; yet the Inha-
bitants of it, from the Beginning of the
World to this time have been exceeding nu-
merous, and may be ftill vaftly more numer-
ous before the end of it. And we muft con-
fider the Earth, not as it is at one particular
Time, but as it is the Seat of Mankind, and
the Habitation of all Generations for all Suc-
cessions of Ages. And under this Notion the
Earth is no fuch contemptible Place, tho* it be
very fmall in refped of the Heavens that fur-
round it. Nor is it ftrange that the Material
World, how capacious fbeyer it be, fhould be
made for Mankind, to whom the Angels are
Mtniflring Spirits, and for whom the Son of
pod himfelf was pleafed to die.
VI. Tliere are few or 'none of the Planets,
but what by reafon of their too near or too
remote Diftance from the Sun, feem incapable
of being inhabited. M- Huygens in his Con*
jeclures concerning the Planetary Worlds^ fays,
that this (*) Water, of our Earth would in
^ tl' Saturn and Jupiter be frozen up immediately,
and in Venus and Mercury it would be evapo-
rated; and he concludes, that every Planet
muft have its Waters of fuch a Temper, as
to be proportioned to its Heat ; 'Jupiter 's and
Sdturns
! of the Chriftian G(eUgioA. an
Saturn s muft: be of fuch a Nature, as not to
be liable to Froft, and Venus s and Mercuries
of fuch, as not to be eafily evaporated by the
Sun. He fays, (*x) That the Heat of the Sun
is nine times greater in Mercury than withu$:(xx^Zl^
in Venus it is twice as hot as with us, the Light 2#
and Heat in Mars is twice, and fometimes three-
fold lefs than ours. If there were any Inhabi-
tants in Jupiter, they would have but the five
and twentieth Part of the Light and Heat, that
we receive from the Sun, and thofe in Saturn
but the hundreth Part. Upon which account he
is very hard put to it to furnifh out Inhabitants
for the reft of the* Planets : but as for the Moon^
and the Satellites's moving about Saturn and
Jupiter, he does as good as give up the Caufe,
by reafon that they are neither Seas, norRivers,
nor Clouds, nor Atmofphere or Vapours, nor
.any kind of Water. Befides, that. the time of
Light and Darknefs. in the Moon being equal
to fifteen of our Days, if the Bodies of the
Inhabitants were fuch as ours are, he obferves,
that thofe who had the Sun pretty high in
their Horizon muft be like to be burnt up in
fuch long days, and thofe that liv'd under the
Poles of the-Moon, would be as much pinch'd
with Cold ; as our Whale ffbers are about Tee-
Land and Nova Zambia in the Summer-time;
And the Summer and Winter in the Moons or
Satellites of Saturn are fifteen Years long ; and
therefore they may well be concluded to bd
Unhabitable: But becaufe it may be all edg tf,
that
%%X The ^eafonablenefs and Certainty t
that the fame thing was believed of the Fri-
gid and Torrid Zones, before Experience con-
vinced Men of their Miftake ; and that, how-
ever, there may be other Planets or Earths yet
undifcovered, at convenient Diftances from
lome of the fixt Scars : I obferve, that tho* it
fhould be granted, that (bme Planets be habita-
ble, it cloth not therefore folio w, that they muft
be actually inhabited, or that ever they have
been. For they might be defign'd, if Man-
kind had continued in Innocency, as Places for
Colonies to remove Men to,as the World fhould
have encreafed, either in Reward to thofe
that had excell'd in Vertue and Piety, to en-
tertain them with the Profpectof New and
Better Worlds ; and fb by degrees, to advance
them in proportion to their Delerts, to the
Heigth of Blifs and Glory in Heaven; Or as
a neceflary Reception for Men ( who would,
then have been immortal) after the Earth had
been full of Inhabitants. And fince the Fall
and Mortality of Mankind, they may be either
for Manfions of the Righteous, or Places of
Punifhment for the wicked, pfter the Refur-
reclion, according as it (hall pleafe God, at
the End of this World to new modify and
transform them. And in the mean time, be-
ing placed at their refpcdive Diftances, they
do by their feveral Motions contribute to keep
the World at a Poife, and the feveral Parts of
it at an /Equilibrium > in their Gravitation up-
on each other, by Mr, Afov/Ws Principles.
tfll. It
of the Chrijlkn Religion. 21~j
VII. It has been fuggefted by (x) Learned <X> cam-
Men, that the Planets may poffibly be inha- ^ffnff *
bited by Rational Creatures of a different Na- &c Huy-
ture from Mankind : their Souls may be of an sens» ®(*
inferior or fuperior Order to ours, and their
Bodies of a different Form and Compofition,
and there may be different Laws of Union and
Communication between the Operations of
their Souls and the Motions of their Bodies ;
For there is no neceffity to believe, that there
can be no fort of Rational Animals but Man-
kind.
But I offer moft of what I have faid on
this Subject, only as Conjectures, which have
at leaft fo much Probability in them, as to Ci-
lence the Objections brought againft the Scri-
ptures on thefe Accounts. For unlefs a Man
can prove thefe or the like Conjectures falfe,
which I am perfwaded no man can ever do,
he muft forbear urging Objections, that will be
infignificant, if thefe Conjectures, or fuch as
theft, fhould be true. It is hard to aflign e»
very particular End and Ufe of many other
wonderful Things in Nature, but lately dis-
covered by Microfcopes, as of any thing ob- •
fervable in the Heavens, either by the naked
Eye, or by Telefcopes. And when the Scrr
ptures mention thofe Ufes of the Heavenly
Bodies, which more immediately concern our
Earth, this doth not deny or exclude any'
other Ufes, for which they may be defignd.
CHAP.
a 1 4 The ${eafonabIene[s and Cettdintj
CHAR XL
That there is nothing in the Scri^
ptures which contradiffs the
late Difcoveries in Natural
Thilofophy*
t. ITT has been well obferved by divers Wri-
J[ ters upon this Subject, that the Scriptures
were written with no dejign of Teaching us
Natural Philofophy, but to inrtfud us in the
Knowledge of God and of our fclves; to
teach us our Duty, and fhew us the way to
live and die well : and therefore they might
make ufe of Popular Expreffions and Forms of
Speech, neither affirming nor denying the
Philofbphical Truth of them, but intending
them only in that Senfe and Meaning,
which was their fole t)efign in ufing them.
All proverbial Sayings and Metaphorical Ex-
preffions by way of IHuftration or Ornament,
muft be taken from received Notions ; but they
are not therefore aderted in the Philofbphical
Senfe by him, who uTeth them any more
than the Hiftorical Truth of Parables and
Similitudes is fuppofed to be aiTerted; And to
have* made ufe only of Philosophical Terms and
Notions
of the Chriftian (Religion. 21 j
Notions, and have re&ified the Vulgar Con-
ceptions of Men concerning all the Phtmme*
na9 which upon occafion are made mention
of in the Scriptures, would have required a
large Syftem of Phiiofcphy, which had made
the x Scriptures a Book unfit for Vulgar Capa-
cities, and for the ufe of the greateli part
of thoie for whom they are -defigned* This
Theory of Nature would befides have feem*
ed as ftrange and incredible to moft Men,
even as Miracles can do. For there is hard-*
ly any thing that Men unacquainted with
Philofbphy are more ftartled at than Philo-
fophical Difcoveries. How incredible doth
the Motion of the Earth, and the reft of the
Sun feem to all Men but Philofbphers? Who arc
generally now agreed in it,whilft the Rifing and
Setting of the Sun are Expreflions now as
much in ufe with fuch as hold the Earth's -
Motion, as with others: And indeed they
rauft fpeak fo, if they will bs underftood, and
excepting this one Inftance, which is and ever"
will be in ufe according to the vulgar Con-
ception in all Countries and Languages, not*
withftanding any Philofophicai Difccveries f
I know nothing in the Scriptures, which is not:
confident with the prefent Notions of Philo-
fbphy.
:« II. And yer. that place of Scripture, which
is i moft objected on this Occafion, is Co ex-
pteft, as that no Advantage can be taken a-
jjA&aiU &Mj fttnd thou (till upon Qtbton^,
2x6 The %eafonablenefs and Certainty
and thou Moon, in the Valley of Ajalon Jofli*
x. 12. Stand thou ftill, or as we read in the
Margin, Be thou filent ', be (till, -do not inter-
rupt our ViQorics, and take part with the
Enemy by withdrawing thy Light, and fa-
vouring his elcape. And again, Verf. 1 5. The
Sun flood ftill (or was filent) and the Moon
ftaid, where the Word applied to the Moon
Signifies properly to flay or ftand ftill, but the
Word uied concerning the Sun is Metaphori-
cal, as if it had been pu'rpofcly fo ordered,
becaufe the Moon moves, but the Sun only
feems to do fo : which is further confirmed
by the following part of the lame Vcrfa where
in the Citation from the Book of Jafier, the
fame Word is uled of the Sup, which was be-
fore ufed of the Moon, fignifying that the
Sun properly ftood ftill. For the Book of
Jjfier is cited in its own words', but when
Jeflj/fa, who wrote by Infpiration, fet down
the words of the Koly Spirit, he expreft the
thing fo, that it cannot be from thence in-
ferr'd, that the Sun muft be fuppofed to move,
but rather the contrary ; tho' immediately af-
ter, in a Citation from another Book; he in-
serts the Expreffion of an Author, who had
followed the vulgar Opinion.
**** III. Gen. i. 6. And God (aid, let there be
a Firmament in the mid ft of the Waters. The
Word translated Firmament is in the Margin
rendrcd Exfanjion , by which. feems to be
aieant this Orb? in which the Earth is placed,
and
if the Chriftian ^eti^ml
and by the Waters above the Firmament or
Expanfion, may be meant the Waters beyond
the Circumference of our Orb, and belonging
to the Planets ; and by the Waters under ih$
Firmament, may be underftood the Waters be-
longing to the Earth, and contained within its
Expanfionv For at firft all was one confufed
Heap of Waters, without any Diftiii&ion of
Orbs ; the Mafs of Waters being extended!
throughout, before the feveral Orbs were ap-
pointed ; but then the Waters belonging to
each Orb were caufed to fubfide towards their
feveral Centersi, till they being gathered to-
gether in their proper Channels and Recepta-
cles, the dry Land appeared.
I confels I once thought this had been on-
ly an Explication of my own, but I, have
fince found, that it is of equal Date with the.
Modem Philofbphy, and that it has likewifs
been lately ufed by others. Indeed it teems
to be (b eafy an Expofition, that I believe it
would come into moft Mens Minds, who
would confider how this Text may be ex-
plain'd according to the new Phiiofophy. O-
thers (jippofe the Firmament to fignir'y the Re-,
gxon of the Air, and by the Waters abovi
the Firmament^ they underftand the Vapours
contained in the Clouds. When he .utter eth.
his Voice there is a Multitude of Water: in the-
Heavens? and he caufeth the vapours to afcend
firomjhe ends of the Earth* Jer. x. i?.
WV Th$ Suit and. Moon are called Two
Z grt&
1 1 $ Tl?e ^eafonahknefs and Certainty
great Lights, Gen. i. 16. But this doth not
imply that either of them is greater than the
fixt Stars, which are not fpoken of till the lat-
ter end of the Verie, But the Sun is the
great Light that rules the day, and the Moon
die great Light that rules the Nighty the Moon
being in refpeSE of the Li^ht which (he gives
us, bigger nan any flxt Star; for She gives
us more Light than they do, in iome fenfe,
however, and with refpeel to us the Moon
is the greater Light, tho* the Stars are the
crreater Luminous Bodies. Confider this Ltf-
minary as it concernr us, and it is in that con-
ception greater than the biggeft Star* Yet
the Sun and the Moon are not (aid to be greater
Lights than the fixt Stars, nor as great as they
are: But are only called great Lights which
they certainly are, th6' every Star fhould be
bigger than either of them. The Stars are
plainly fpoken of by themfelves, and apart
from the Sun and Moon, without any compan-
ion or relation to them. And God made two great
Lights, the greater Light to rule the Day, and
the leffer Light to rule the Night : He made the
Stars alfo : That is, befides the two great Lights
Which are the Sun and Moon, He made the
$rars, which are diftinguifhed from thefe, and
not reckoned with them, but are fpoken of by-
way of Parenthefis. The Srars being of another
pivifion of Celeftial Bodies, and belonging to
other Orbs, are mentioned here diftin&ly, and
lot witli any comparifon to the Sun and Jvioon :
But
of the Cbriftian Religion. 12$
But will any Man deny that the Su*i and
Moon are great Lights, beeaufe the Stars are
great Lights too , and as big perhaps as the
Sun, and bigger than the Moon ? There are
in Qaropc many great Cities, and there are
great Cities likewile in other parts of the
World: Doth therefore he that fays there
are great Cities in Europe to Rule the Neigh-
bouring Countries and Cities in other parts of
the World, alfo, fay, That the Cities of Fu-
rore are greater than any Cities in the reft of
the World ? Or if any one fhould fay God made
four great Rivers to Water Paradife, and Ri-
vers in other places alfo, would he thereby
affirm, that the Rivers of Paradife were larger
than all die Rivers in the World befides?
V. i Sam. ii. 8. We read of the Pillars of
the Earth ; but this is fpoken Metaphorically,
end by Pillars of the Earth may be meant the
Power of the Princes of the World, mention-
ed but juft before. In the like fenfe it is faid,
Pfal. lxxv. $. The Earth and all the Itskaki- iUmnas °*
*tants thereof are diffolved : I bear up the Pit" hoc loco,
Urs of it. We find mention, made of the E^jS"
Pillars of the Earth, Job- ix 6, which is to be ra» inteiiu
under flood of the Earth's unmoveable ftabili- samus^
t y, (x) as St. Jcrom obferves, and fo the other us fup
iper
Texts may likewife be understood by the Pil- {**« 'P-
lars of the Heavens, J^xxvi. 11. we sre tof^™1*
underftand that Power which fupports and mois f n-
upholds them. %w,n%
VI. T^xxxvii- 1 8. The Sky ii (aid to be^ix'S
0*. * pong%
I jo Yfo ^edfonablenefs and Certainty
flrong) and as a Molten Looking~glafiy that is,
to be durable, and refembhng a Molten Look-
ing- glafs. But however they be taken, thefe
are the Words of Elihu i And Job's Friends
finned in what they charged him withal, .and
therefore he may be iiippofed to make fo in-
nocent a miitake, as to think the Heavens lb*
lid, or at leaft, he as well as the reft might
fpeak the Language of thole that did think
fo.
VII. Job fpeaks ftri£Uy according to Phi*
lofophy, when he faith, that God hangeth the
Earth upon Nothings Job. xxvi. 7, And we
read, PfaL xxiv. 2. That the Lord hath founded
the Earth upon the Seas, and eftablifked it upon
the Floods, and, PfaL Civ. 5. that he hath laid
the Foundations of the Earth$ that it fljould not
fo removed for ever* All which is as exactly
as any Philofbpher can fpeak. For the Foun-
dation of a pendulous Globe can be nothing
but its Center, upon which all the parts lean
and are fupported thereby, And the Waters
Continually flowing thro' the Bowels and Con-
cavities of the Earth from the depths of the
Sea, by a conftant Courfe and Circulation, con«
fritute an Abyfs of Waters in the lowermoft
j>artq pf the Earth. So that with great Pro-
!)riety of Speech, the Terraqueous Globe is
3$ to hang upon nothing, and the Earth
id be founded upon the Seas and Eftablifhed
'upon the Floods; and, PfaL Cxxxvi. 6. to be
ftrsuhed out above thx Waters,
1 ' "' m\. Thefe
of the Chriflian Religion. 1 3 1
Thefe are the places of Scripture, which as
far as I have obferved, have been moft acce*
pted againft in this particular ; and yet there
is nothing in them but what may be account-
ed for upon the Principles of Modern Phi-
lofbphy.
CHAR XII.
Of Mavis being created capable
of Sin and Damnation.
IT is fufficient to prove the Reafonablenefs
of God's Proceedings with Mankind, if
none are punifhed, but thole that defcrve Pu%
nifhmenr, and none punifhed more than they
deferve; and all are rewarded, who by a,
Faithful and Sincere, tho' but a very im per-
fect Obedience are become qualifyed for a
Reward. God can do nothing but what is
perfectly Juft, and Infinitely Merciful, and
we muft be very unreafbnable, if we cavil
at his Proceedings, which are confident net
only with Juftice and Equity, but with Mer-
cy it felf. For where neither his Juftice nor
his Mercy and Goodnefs imerpole, we mi-fl:
finely acquiefce in the Divine' Plea fare, unkfs
we can think that God himfelf fhould be
Q^4 more
\ * i Ttie QUeafonablenefs and Certainty
more confined in his Actions than Men are :
For within the Limits of Juftice and Mercy,
it is certainly left at the Liberty of every
Man in any Office or Authority, to do as he
thinks fit. Yet as God is pleafed in his deal-
ings with Men, to appeal to their own Rea-
fon for the Equity of them ; fo there is no-
thing in all his Proceedings with us, but it
may be made appear to be more reafonable,
even according to the Notion that we have
of things, than the contrary would have been.
It muft de confidered, that no Crated Being
can in its own Nature be uncapable of Sin or
Default, Becaufe it cannot be infinitely per-
fect; for it is infeparable from all Creatures
to have but finite Perfections, and whatever
has bounds fet to its Perefctions is in fome
rcfp:ct imperfect, that is, it wants thofe Per-
fections which a Being of Infinite Perfections
alone can have. So that imperfection is im-
plied in the very Eflfunce of Created Beings^
and what is imperfect may make Default.
All inanimate tilings niay deviate from the
Regular courfe of their Natures, as they
would certainly do, if the Divine Wildom
and Power did not guide and maintain them
in it. And every rational Being muft natu-
rally have a Liberty of Choice, that is, it
muft have a Will to chute, as well as an Under-
standing to Realon : For we have no notion
w there can be Reaion without Choice. A
Faculty of Undcrftanding without a Will to
deter?
of the Chriftian Religion. 2JJ
determine it, if left to it felf, mull always
think of the fame Objeft, or proceed in. a
continued Series and Connexion of Thoughts,
without any Aim or End, which would be 3
perpetual Labour in vain,and tedious Thought-
fulnefs to nc purpole: But, if it fhould be
fometimes determined by fomething External
to new Objects; yet, what ufe of Reafon could
there be in Contemplations, which were mere-
ly obtruded and forced upon the Mind? And
becaufe Rational Creatures muft have ibme
prefcribed Rule of their Actions, from which
being free Agents, they may depart; they
muft in their own Nature be capable of Sin*
God is Infinite Perfection, and therefore is a
Rule to himfelf, 2nd his EfTence is uncapable
of any other Rule of his Actions ; he only
Acts according to his EfTence, from which it
is impoffible for him to vary. But the mofl:
perfect Creatures muft: aft: by a Rule, which
is not.effential to them, but prefcribed them by
God, and is not; fbintrinfick to their Natures,
but that they may decline from jt, for a
free Agent may follow or not follow the Rule
appointed, or elle it would not be free.
The Difficulty therefore is not, why Man
was Created capable of Sinning; for he could
not poflibly by his Creation and in his Nature
be uncapable of it ; this is peculiar to God,
who is infinite Perfection, that all Sin fhould
be a contradiction to His very Nature.. and
EfTence. But the Queftion which has been
flatted
• 34 ^ titiafmMenefs and Certainty
ftartcd by fome Men, if they State it right,
muft be this, How it came to pafs, that God
did not fuftain and preferve Men by an irre-
fiftible Power from falling into Sin, when
Damnation was to be the confequence of it ?
tn anfwer to which, it might fuhice to fay,
that in the Creation God muft be fuppofed tQ
a& by His divine Prerogative, and by His ar-
bitrary Will and Power ; He giv.eth not ac-
count of ttnj of his Matters, Job xxxiii. i $.
but it is enough for us to know, that he made
Man happy, and capable of continuing happy,
and that there could be no neceflity, why he
{hould force him to continue fq. "fho* we
Want not in the mean time Reafons to prove,
<even* to our weak and imperfect Underftand-
ings, that it v/as expedient that the Happinefs
or Mifery of Man (hould depend upon his own
Choice, rather than that he fliould be kept un-
avoidably from all fin, and be placed out of
air poflibility of Punifhment and Mifery.
I. Becaufe the Glory of God is hereby more
advanced, and all the Attributes of His Wif-
dom, and Juftice, and Goodnefs are more difT
played, than if Men had been inevitably rq-
ftrain'd from (inning. II. Becaufe this con-
duceth more to the Happinefs of the Bleflfed,
than a Neceflity of not (inning could have
done.
I. The Glory of God is more advanced,
and the Attributes of his Wifdom and his Ju-
ftice, and of hisGoodnefs it felf are more dip
played
of the Cbriftian Religion. ^ } f
played by leaving Men to a Freedom of act-
ing, than they could have been by impofing
an inevitable Fate and Neceflity of not finnltig
upon Mankind. Unlefs Man had been left ca-
pable of (inning againit God, he could not
have been in a Capacity of paying him a
true and proper Obedience : for Obedienqs
fuppofe.h Choice, and Choice fuppofeth a
Poflibility of Difbbedience. To obey God in
proper fpeaking, is to chufe to do what God
has commanded, to fubmit to his Will, and
to refblve t6 do what we know to be pleating
to Him, upon that very Reafbn and Confide-
ration, becaufe we know it to be His pleafure ■•
not becaufe the Neceflity of our own Nature,
or fome over-ruling Power forceth us upon it.
The Obedience of Rational Creatures, fup-
pofing them from their firft Creation out of
all poflibility of finning, would be no other,
than that of the irrational and inanimate Be-
ings, and a Man then* could be no more truly
(aid to obey God in acting as God has ap-
pointed, than a Stone may be faid to obey
him in falling downward, or the Fire in at
cending; Theie act according to God's ap-
pointment, asd fo would Man, if he acted
upon neceflity ; but it is an Honour and Ho-
mage due to God from Rational Creatures,
that they fhould determine themfelves to do
as he has commanded, and make a free Ac-
knowledgment of his Bounty and Goodnefs,
and pay a voluntary Submiflion to the- Divine
i Authc.
The 1{eafonablenefs and Certainty
Authority, which is their reafondle Service*
The Wifdom of God is and will be, efpe-
elally at the Day of Judgment, more confpi-
cuous by the Government of a wicked World,
than it would have been, if all men had been
forcibly kept from doing wickedly. To re-
strain the Paflions, and over- rule all the Vices
of Men, and let bounds to them ; to bring
Good out of Evil, and by unexpected Ways
and Methods to lead Men to Repentance, and
to appoint and bring to pals the whole Dip
penlation of the Gofpel, by which the Trea-
lures and Myfteries of the Divine Wifciom are
revealed, and fuch things are difcovered, as
even the Angels themfelves defire to look into,
I Pet. i, 12. this magnifies the Wifdom of
God much more than the State of Men unca*
pable of Sin could have done* There is much
more Wifdom fhewn in governing Free A-
gents, than in governing by Fate and Ne-
Ceflity, and more Widom in making the
worft Actions as inftrumental and ferviceable
|o the purpofes of Holinefs and Goodnefs, as
the beft could have been, than in not fufrcring
thcnl to be, and more in Redeeming Man than
in keeping him by Force in fuch a Condition,
as to ftand in no need of Redemption.
All the Divine Attributes are much more
magnified by the Incarnation of the Son of
God for the Redemption of Man, than they
could have been, if he had never fall'n : The
Love of God is manifefted in a more won-
derful
of the Chrifiian fyligion. Zty
derful manner by fending His own Son to die
for us ; His Juftice in requiring Satisfaction,
and His Wifclom, and Truth, and Faithful-
nefs in recovering Man from his miferable
Condition, and per feeling the Defign of his
Creation, in defpight of hisDifbbedience.
It is the Mercy of God to fave them that
are faved ; but his Juftice is executed only
upon the wicked ; and why fhould we think
it reafonable, that God fhould debar himfelf
the exercife of one of his Attributes rather
than punifh fuch Men, as thro* their own Ob-
ftinacy will perifh ? Juftice is as much a Per-
fection of God as Mercy is; and tho' it may
feem terrible to us, yet it is as reafonable in it
felf, that wicked Men fhould perifh, as that
the righteous fhould be faved : And God a£ts
upon Principles of infinite Reafbn and Wifc
dom, without any mixture of Pafiion, There*
fore I demand, Is it reafonable or not, that
the wicked fhould fuffer ? And if it be, why
fhould not God act according to his own Attri-
butes,and the true Reafbnsof things,ratherthari
by our weak and fond Paffions? Since there
is infinite Wifdom, and Juftice, and Mercy
in God s Proceedings, it cannot be conceived*
Why the Ruine which many Men will bring
upon themfelves, fhould either alter or hinder
the Divine Counfels and Decrees.
II. A freedom of Choice conduceth mord
to the Happinefs of the BlefTed, than a Necef1
fity of not finning could have done. The
Happinefs
% 3 8 The ^edfonahlenefs and Certainty
Happinefs of Heaven confiils in the Love and
Enjoyment of God ; but Lcve is never fo great,
nor fo (enfible an Happinefs, as when there
has been fome Tryal and Experience in the
proof of it. . And it muft advance the Hap-
pineis both of Angels and Men in Heaven,
that upon Choice and Tryal they have pre-
ferred God before all things, and upon that
find themfelves confiim'd and Eftablifhed in
the perpetual and unalterable Love and En-
joyment of him. This very Confideration,
that they might once have falVn from his Love,
infpires them with the higher! Ardors of Love,
when they rejoyce in the infinite Rewards of
fo eafy and fhort a Tryal : and the Reflection
upon the Dangers efcaped, heightens evin the
Joys of Heaven it felf to them, and makes an
Addition to every degree of Blifs. The Re-
membrance of their pair. Sins and Temptations,
and theSenfe of their own Unworthinefs ant-
ing from that Remembrance, will continually
excite in the blefled frefh Acts of Love and
Adoration of God, who has raifed them above
all Sin and Temptation, and fixt them in an
everlafting State of Blifs and Glory. The
Tryal that the Righteous underwent here
makes up fome part of their Happinefs in
Heaven, and in what degree foever their Hap-
pinefs can be iuppofed to be, yet it is in fbme
meafure encreafed, and, as it were, endeared
to them by reflecting upon their former State
of Tryal, which they were fubjed to Tem-
ptation and Sin. Th<f
of the Lbrijtmn Religion.
The Love and Praifes, and Adorations of
the Father for fending his Son and accepting
his Ranfcm of the Son, as our blefTed Saviour
and Redeemer, and of the Holy Ghoft as our
Guide and Conductor to Heaven, muft fup-
pofe that we needed a Ranfbm and a Re-
deemer, and the Grace and Influence of the
Holy Ghoft ; that is, we muft have been ca>
pable of Sin and Mhery, or elfe we had want-
ed thefe Motives to the Love of God, which
the Difpenfation of the Golpel affords, and
which will make up the Happinefs of Hea-
ven to us. Creatures cannot comprehend
the Divine EfTence, but they know and love
God, according as he manifofjs himfelf to them;
and therefore that Difpenfation, which doth
moft manifeft the Love and Wifdom, and
Goodnefs of God, doth moft conduee to the
Glory of God and the Happinefs of Men.
The BlefTed fhall fee God face to fact, they
fhall enjoy his Prefence and partake of his
Glory, and in this their Happinefs will con»
lift; but the Love of God is not only the
neceffary cpnfequence of this Beafitick Vifion,
out it is antecedently necefTary to qualify us
for it, and the more any Soul is inflamed with
the Divine Love*- the fuller and more perfeft
Vifion of God we muft fuppofe it to enjoy.
But Goodnefs is the Object of our Love, and
hot Goodnefs in the Idea fo much, as Good-
nefs extended to us : And as God's Goodnefs is
Rrore manifefted in fending his Son to atone
for
The ^eafonablenefs and Certainty
for our Sins, than it could have been by ex-
empting us from all poffibility of Sinning;
(b our Love to him muft be more ftrongly ex-
cited, whereby the Soul is dilated, as it werey
and made more receptive of the Communi-
cations of the Divine Ertence in the
Beatifick Vifion. As Faith is made perfect by
Works proceeding from Love in this Life, and
without Charity is nothing worth 5 fo in the
other World, where Faith fhall be fwallowed
up in Vifion, Love muft be that Power or
Quality in the Soul, whereby we become ca-
pable of receiving the Divine Communications,
and the more extentive and boundlels this is,
the more bappy we lhail be ; and therefore,
whatever is moft conducing to advance the
Love of God in us, is the heft means of our
Salvation and future Happinefs.
The Motives which the Chriftian Religion
affords us, to the Praife and Love of God,
will accompany us for ever to augment and
improve the Happinefs, even of Heaven it felf,
where Charity never fails : and it is not con-
ceivable how the Divine Love could have been
fb fully manifefted, and fet forth to us fo glo-
riouily, if Man had never falln, but by repre-
(entihg to him the Danger of his Fall, and
the gracious Defign of God towards him, fup-
poling he had fali'n. To have efcaped Hell,
snd to find our felves in the unchangeable
Poffetfionof Sajvatfon by the free Mercy and.
(joodneis of God? and by the Death of his
of the Chriftian IReligion^ r^t
own Son, are Thoughts which muft create a
hew Heaven, as it were, in Heaven itfelfj
I mean, they will enlarge our Souls to the ut-
mdft Capacities of our Natures, and fill and
actuate them with inch Divine Ardors of
Love, aTs if we had been kept neceffaiily froni
all Sin, Teem impoffible to have been raffed in
US. The Angejs themlelves'r^K^ over one
Sinner that repenteth, and that Joy mail have
been wanting to them, who are of fo mucli
higher and more excellent a Nature than w$
are of, if there had been no Poffibility either
of Sin, or of Repentance. And the wonder-
ful, Difpenfation of the Gofpel is an eternal
Subject of Praife and Adoration," an eternal
Fountain of Love, apd Joy, and Happinefs to
all the BlefTed Spirits in Heaven, ■
The more the Divine Attributes are.dit
played, the more Adorable the Majelty of
God will appear, and will become the greater
Object of our Praife and Veneration ; thofe thit
are wife and good will be made the wiferand
better by it, and the happier in the Contempla-
tion of the Divine Perfections. Now a Go--
vernour in his Laws, and in the Method and
Order of his Government,1 has regard chiefly
to the Good and Obedient, mid has little Con^
cern for the reft. And we niuft confider God
not only as the Father, but as the Governour
of Mankind ; and thoJ an earthly Father per-
haps would by all means poffible preserve hii
Son from incurring Puniihrnent, yet a good
R 6dvcn£i
24* The %eafonablenefs and Certainty
Goveniourj when the Ends of his Govern-
ment can be better obtained by leaving him to
his Liberty, would nor reftrain him by any
Force or Violence. Therefore if the Liberty
of Choice in Men, and the Poffibility of their
Sin and Damnation be for the Glory of God,
and for the Benefit of good Men, and be no
Injury to the Bad ; this is a iofrlcient Account,
why -man was not neceflarilj re ft rained from
Sinning, tho' Damnation be the confequence
of it. •
CHAR XIII.
Of the Fall of the Angels, and
of our Firji Parents.
IN the Beginning God created every thing
perfect in its kind, and endned the Angels
and Man with all intellectual and Moral Per.
fe&ions fnitable to their re fpe&ive Natures:
but fb as to leave them Capable of finning.
For it pleafed the infinite Wifdom of God
( for the Reafbns already alledg'd, and for ma=
ny more, and greater Reafbns perhaps than any
man is able to imagine) to place them in a
State of Tryal, *and to put it to their own
Choice, whether they would ftand in their
prefent Condition of Innocence and Happi-
he%
hf the Chriftian Religion.
flefc^if which they were created, or fall into
Sin and Mifery. We have little or no Account
in the Scriptures of theCaufeor Teniptation^
which occafioned the Fair of -Angels.; bee£$fe
fa doth not concern tte to be acquainted wftfr
it ; afid therefore it little becomes us to fj£
inquifitive about it. Indeed it is very diffh
cult to conceive, how Beings of fo Grea£
Knowledge and Purity, as the Falfn Angels
once were of? fhould fall into Sin : But it muft
be confidered, that nothing is more unaccoun-
table than the Motives and Caufes of Actios
in Free Agents : when any Being is at Liberty
to do as it will, no other Reaton befides its
own Will need be enquir'd for, of its Actings.,
What is liable to Sin, may fin, whatever the
Motive be; and to enquire after the Motive
is to enquire what Motives may determine
a Froe Agent, that is, an Agent, which
may determine it felf upon any Ground or
Motive.
But how perfect and excellent fbever any
Creature is, unlefsitbe fo confirmed and efta-
blifhed in a State of Parity and Holinefs, as
to be feeured from ail portability of Sinning,
it may be fuppofed to admire it felf, and dote,
upon its own Perfections and Excellencies, and
by degrees, to neglect and not acknowledge
God the Author of them,- but to fin and re-
bell againft .Him. And it. is moft agreeable
both to Scripture and Reafbn, that Fride was.:
the caufe of the Fall of Angels, For thofe
—±.
344 ^e ^af°na^enefs an<l Certainty
Excellencies which might fecUre th^if from
any other Sin proved a Temptation to this,
and the greater their Perfections were^ the
greater was the Temptation ; as in a Man
who is guilty of Spiritual and Pharifaical Pride,
all that is good and commendable in him af-
fords him only matter for Ins Sin. So that
where there is a freedom of Will and a po(*
jibility of Sinning, the very Perfection of
Nature in a Creature may be made an Occa-
fion to fin ; and that, which excludes other
fins may prove a Motive and Temptation to
Pride, v/hich therefore we have peaibn to
conclude was the Sin of the Fall'n Angels.
As to the Fall of Man, however the Thing
may be difputed, the Effe&s of it are vifible
in the ftrange Pronenefs of Humane Nature,
to a£r. againft Reafbn and Confcience, that is,
to a£r. in plain contradiction to it feli^ and
its own Principles. This is a State in which
it cannot be fuppofed, that Mankind was at
firft created by the infinitely Good and Holy
God. And the mod plaufible Opinion, and
that which has moft LcneraHy obtained a-
mong the Heathens, is, that the Souls of Men
had a Being before they came into this World,
and were fent into Human Bodies in Pnnifh-
ment for what they had done amifs in a pre-
cedent State. But this is mere f ufpicion and
Conjecture without any poffibility of Proof,
" and there is this plain Reafon againft it, that
*o man can be punifhed for his Amendment,'
who
of the Chriftian (Religion* %xm
who knows- nothing o£ it. For it is inconfi-
ftent with the Nature, and end of Punifhment,
that the Offender fbould not be made fenfible
of his Fault, efpecially when the Punifhment is
defigned for his Amendment, as it is laid ta
be in the prefent Cafe.
If it can be fuppofed, that Men may pofn>
bly retain no Remembrance of what they
did in another State, yet if their Faults were
not kept in Memory, they fhould be brought
to their Remembrance,if this Life were defigned
as a State of Punifhment in order to Amend-
ment. But the State of this Life is fo far from
being thought a Punifhment, that Men natural-
ly are of nothing more fond, nor dread any
thing more than to leave it. And tho' Men
meet with great Afflictions here, yet thofe
do not befall thole only or chiefly, who
by their Pronenefs to Evil in this Life, might
be fuppofed to have been the greater!: Often*
ders in a former State, and every Calamity hasj
not the Nature of Punifhment. The Suffer?
ings aftd Miferies which we endure by reafbn
of Adams TranfgreiTion are not fb properly
Punifhments as the Effects and Coqfequences
of his fin : But Perfonal Faults fiich as ai e fup-
pofed to have been committed in a State of
pre-exiftence require a proper Punifhment,
and if the Puniihment be for Amendment, as
it is fuppofed to be in this prefqnt Srate,
both the Fault and the Punifhment muft be
known, with the Caufe and End of its being
R 3 in^
The Reafonablenefs apd Certainty
infliQed, and the greater!. Offenders muft
undergo the (evereft Pmufhmenr.
The Account which the Scripture gives us
cf the Fall of our Firft Parents may be confi-
dered either, i. in the Manner, or 3- in^the
f onfequences of it*
i. If we confiderthe Manner of the Fall of
jDur Firfl Parents, i. Eve was beguiled by the
Serpent, and ddtm was enticed by Her to eat
ths Forbidden Fruit. 2. They both eating of it,
thereby fell from their State of Happinefs.
So Eve was beguiled by the Serpent, and
Jd&rj was enticed by her. It is not to be
fcppofed, but that the Devil would ule all
thi' Means that the fubtilty of his Malice
could invent, to procure the Ruine of Man-
kind, and that thtretore he would not only
ke ule of inward Suggestions, but of out-
ward Allurements alfo by a vifible Jhape and
Appearance, And if he had ailumed the fhape
of a Man or Woman ; Eve kpew that there
was none of Human Kind but Ad Am and
Jicr felf in the World, and therefore that Shape
was leaft of a}| proper for him to make u(e
of puf |f lie ^il ailumed any other fhape,
pr . ,.i>y ccher Creature as his In-
;he lame, or the like Objections might
jnft it, that can be fuppofed againft
JiU beguiling Eve by a Serpent, "
The Serpent's fubtilty made him the fitter
Inftrument for the Devil's Purpofe, for all fi*
nice Agents can act no other wife than as the
matter
of the Chrijiian Religion. 1 47
matter they have to work withal will per-
mit, It is fuppofed by a Q) Perfon of great <>>
Learning, that Eve was tempted by a fiery {'■ \
flying Serpent, fuch as are ftill fc-en in fomQ^hp. n.
Parts of the World, of great brightness and
Splendor, being (tiled Seraphims: Npm. xxi. ^ rjJt^
6, 8V Ifai. xiv. 29. which- is a Name that de- •'•--«. '#. "
notes likewile one of the highefl: Orders of jj/
Angels; and he concludes that this fijry Ser-xr.'ii. «i
pent appeared to Eve in fuch a Shining and'/'5-'
Beautiful Luftre, as fhe had feen Angels ap-™^.'/'-^."
pear in before, and that it was miftaken Dyptt.i*vi»
her for an Angel. This Account has great ^/Jp*/"
probability in it; but if it fhould not be ad-jfcf.i/
1 mitted, yet we may oblerve that ordinary ry;rr>
Serpents were generally eiteemed (acred by^L'J
the Heathens, as it is evident from the Ci
duceus of Mercury, and many Other io&urces;
the light of them was accounted a (b; good !, 'e) rder.
Omen, and the (c) Gem) were painted under Mix *&.
the form of Serpents. It was (d; reportel^Q^
both of Alexander and ScJpio, that tnc 44
were begotten of Jupiter under the fhape of J!w'f* ^
a Serpenr, and (e) jEfculapiiis is (aid to have ^r.7^3
afTumed that form, when he wastranfpc -rr:-. '
in the time of a great Plague item Epi- sx?;'i //, L
d&nrus to i^ow^, (?) Serpents were had in t:\cr .
The Story of (s) Qphior.eus am
/£*#j was taken from the Devifc a0umi
R 4 tie
: 248 Tl?e iReafonablenefs and Certainty
the Form or Body of a Serpent in his tempt-
(h)Tertui ing 0f £vey and the Hereticks called (h) 0-
Jjjnf? ffjits worfhiped a Serpent, and to name no
more inftances, Serpents have commonly had
Religious Worfhip paid them both by Antient
Acoftj/I. and- (^ Moclern Heathens. And if the Devil has
5. r.$" 12", been' fo generally- Worfliiped in the Form of
iJgMmin. ^ seipent fince the Fall, it can feern no in-
zjL j,^4. credible thing that he fliould by a Serpent
{deceive £^.v He teems to have prided him-
felf is this 'manner of Worfhip, to infult and
trample upon fall'n Mankind, by caufing him*
felf to be adored under that very form, by
■which he nrft wrought our.Ruine; to which
purpofe QUmsns Alexmdrinus Q) obferves,
that in the Feafts of Bacchus, they were wont
to cry out Swkv meaning, as he fuppofes Eve ;
(m) Lucretius makes Eva», a Denomination of
JUccbus. However it can be no impoffible
thing, that E1/4 fhould be deceived once by a
Creature, by which her Pofterity lias been de-
ceived, even to the Worfhip of it in fb ma-
ny Ages and Countries fince* The Speech of
a Scroe.it could be no friehtful thing to
£vc4 who knew not what Fear was before
Slier VaW] and if it be thought abfiird (tho'
.v-ap ih foon after her own Creation) that
(Jiopld not know but that other Creatures
might have the ufeof Speech ^s well as Man *
ITet why might not file attribute his faculty
oi' Speech to the Vertue of that Fruir, which
he might be fuppofed to have- ta (led, and
from
of the Chriftran Religion. zqq
from his own Experience to recommend to
her. So far is it from any Inconfiftency or
Improbability, that Eve fhould be beguiled by
a Serpent ; and when (he was once deceived,
it will not be denyed but that A&am might be
•enticed by her.
2. The Sin committed by our Firft Parents
was in eating the forbidden Fruit, and they
both eating of it, feil thereby from their Pri-
mitive State of Happinefs. The time when
our Firft Parents (inned is uncertain, and there-
fore, there is no ground for the Obje&ion,
which fbme have framed by crowding a long
feries of things into the Bufinefs of one day.
Many Circumftances are omitted in the Scri-
ptures concerning the State of our Firft Pa-
rents in Paradife, and relating to their Fall.
For no more is mentioned than was needful
to Mofes^s Defign^ which was to give a very
brief Account of the moft remarkable things
that had paft from the Creation to his
own Times.- It appears that our Firfl: Parents
were no ft rangers to the Prefence and Voice
of God, and there is no reafon to doubt
but that they - were fully inftru&ed in the
Terms propoled to tftem, with the Reafona-
blenefs of God's Commandments, how much
depended upon their Obedience, what danger
they were in,, and how eafily they might es-
cape it, and become enftated in Everlafting In*
nccence and Happinefs.
God had determined to make Tryal of them
by
% « o The <%eafonahlene/s and Certainty
by purpofing an eafy inftance of their Obedi*
ence, and by forbidding them the ufe of but
one Tree in Paradife : It was but a fmall re-
ftraint, and they had Ability enough to
have overcome the greateft Temptation, and
Life, and Death were fet before them, as the'
Reward or Punifhment of their Obedience or
Difobedience, upon eating the forbidden
Fruit, they muft furely die ; but if they
had but refrained from it, another Tree was
provided, the eating of which fhould as cer-
tainly have made them Immprtal, as this made
them fubjecl: to Death : For then without ever
undergoing Death, they fhould have been'tran-
flated to a State of more perfect Blifs and
Happinefs.
It cannot be deny'd, but that it was very
fitting and reafonable, that God fhould lay
fbme Reltraint upon our Firft parents, where-
by he might be obeyed, and his Soveraignty
acknowledge : And as no Law could be more
eafily obferv'd than this, To it was moft pro-
per for the place in which they were, and for
their manner of Life and State of Inno-
cence. The common Rules and Laws of Mo-
rality could then Icarce have any place, «but
it was requiiite that this or fbme fuch other
Inftance of Obedience, fhould be impofed.
Theft, and Murder, and Adultery, and other
Sins againfr. Moral Duties were then either
impoflible to be Committed, or fo unnatural,
that it can hardly be imagined, how any of
them
of the. Chrijllan Religion. % « g
diemfhould be committed, whea there were
yet but two Perfons in the World, in a State
of perfect Innocence | and therefore in Moral
Duties there could be no Tryal of the Obedi*
ence of our Firft parents; betides, thefe were
ib well known to them, that there could be
no need of any Command concerning them.
But God gives them a Command in a Thing
of an indifferent: Nature, that fb he might
have a plainer proof of their Obedience, in a
thing which was both indifferent of it felf,
and £b eafy to them, that nothing but a care-
le(s and perverfe Neglecl: could betray them
into Difobedience. To fuppofe Good and
Evil to be in the Nature of Things only, and
not jn the Commandments and Prohibitions of
God, is in effect a renouncing of God's Au-
thority ; but this Tree was . the Tree of the
Knowledge of Good and Evil : For it made
them fenfible of the Divine Authority upon
which Moral Good and Evil formally depend,
tho' materially they be in the Nature of
Things; Whatever God is pleafed to com-
mand or forbid, however indifferent it be in
it (elf, is for that very Reafon, lb far as it is
commanded or forbidden by him , as truly
Good or Evil, as if it were ablolutely and
morally (bj "being enacted by the lame Divine"
Authority, whereby all Moral Precepts be-
come obligatory as Laws to us ; For all Mo*
ral Truths, or Precepts, or Rules of Life,
however certain and neceilary in themidve;,
yet
f J 2 The T^eafonablenefs and Certainty
yet receive the Obligation of Laws from the
Divine Authority, this being the raoft certain
Truth in Morality * and in order of Nature an-
tecedent to ail others, that God is to be obey-
ed in all that he commands or forbids. But
the Divine Authority was folely and purely
concern'd in this Commandment, which had
no foundation in the Nature of Things, but
depended meerly upon the Will and Pleafure
of God, and by the Tranfgreffion of this Law,
it became notorious to our Firli parents and
their unhappy Poiterity? that both Good and
Evil, whatever they may be in Speculation
and abftra&ed Notions, yet as they concern
us. in the Practice of our Lives, are to be re-
folvM ultimately into the Divine Authority ;
God is our Lawgiver, and nothing can be a
Law to us but by His enacting, and what he
enacts mud be a Law to us ; and of the fame
fieceHary indfpenable Obligation, fo far as he
is pleafed to enjoyn it, whether it be a Mo-
ral Precept, or only an indifferent Thing in its
own Mature. It feems then that God was
pleafed to manifeft his Sovereign Authority in
this Commandment, and to lhew that it is ab-
folute and iodepe upoa Moral Good or
Evil; and that tho' his infiniteHolinefs andGood*
nels would not permit him to Command any
thing contray to Moral Duties, nor furfe;- him
not to command Moral Good, and forbid
Moral Evil ; yet his Authority is arbitrary o-
ver us, extending as far beyond all the Duties
of
of the Chriftian Religion. i$$
of Morality as he pleafes, which indeed are
only Truths and Precepts, brJt not Duties to
us but by Vertue of his Authority. This Com-
mandment therefore was given in AfTertion q£
God's Authority, whcm it is always and in
everything good to obey, and evil to difobey,
as-otircFirft parents found by fad Experience.
(n) Maimonides cbferves, that they had the 00*&**
Knowledge of Truth and Falfhcod before, JJj£ p^-
but Good and Evil became known tothem.i.f.2.
bv t eir Fall, whereby they understood the
Value of that Good which they had left, and
were made fenfible of the Yuiery of that Con-
dition, into which t 3 brought them-
felves: They perceived A;ow good it was. to
obt\ God, and how evil to be difobedient 'to
Him in any thing whatfoever.
(*] Mr. biede has obferved that their Sin was ^ ^ u
Sacrilege. God had referved that Tree as ho- DifcsxnL
ly to Hmftlr in Token of his Dominion and
Sovereignty, and appointed it to fuch ules as
he had defigned it ror : and therefore it was a
Sacrifegious Prophanation to eat of it ; jt was
a Theft or Robbery, nolefsthan the Robbing ,
of God, as the Prophet (tiles Sacrilege, and an
lnvafion of his Right. And the i^ord Go* /aid,
Behold the hhn is becomekas one of us to knot*
Good and tvii. Gen. hi. 22. which words are
generally fuppofed to have been fpoken by a
fevere Sarcafnt, or# with an upbraiding Anger
and Indignation ; but they feem to admit of
«a eafier Senfe, if they be thus interpreted ;
Thi
- 254 "^ ^edfonablenefs and Certainty
The wan is become <u one of /#, he has mada
himfeif as on^pf us; he has aifumed to him-
feif an equality With us. Chnft thought it
not robbery to be equal with God. Phil. ii. 6. to
be equal is there w claim an Equality j and fo
to become us one of my ib to challenge or pre-
tend to become as one of us", according.,tp the
Devil's Snggeftion. Chnft knew it to be no
Injury or Prefump.ion in Himfeif, who was m
the. Form 'of God, and was God as well as Man2
to afTume to Himfeif an Equality with the
Father : But our Firft Parents, who were
made in the Image of God and after his Like
nefsx were net cbniegted with this, but affect-
ed iomething highv,f £han the Ferr~ec~t;ons of a
Creature, and aim'd at an indtpendant State
o\ Wifdom and Immortality , being fed uced
by the Serpent, who laid uito the Woman>
Te fhall not jurtly die, ye /ha// be as Gods,
knowing Good and Evi{. Gen. iii. 4, 5. This
was a molt heinous Cnme to believe t! e Ser-
pent rather than _ God Himfeif, and to be fe-
duced by him, and hope by his Advice to pro-
cure to, theiiifelves Divine Wifdom and lm-
mortaiteappinels.
II. The Confluences of the Fall of our Firft
Parents were anfwerable to their Crime, and
were eitherlipon themfelves, or upon their Po«
fterity,or upon the Serpent and otherCieatures*
I. The Curfe upon the Serpent was by a
vifible Obje£t and Reprefent ition, to denote
that Curie and Punifhment which was de«;
nouricecf
of the Cbriflian Religion. % j j
nounced agaihft the Tempter himielf, who af-
fumed the Body of a Serpent. The Serpent
before had a freer and ftronger Motion, and
could lift up himfelf and reach the Fruits of
the Trees, but is fince confined to the Ground,
and is forced to feek his Food in the Duflr.
And there being Relations of Serpents, which
carry Part of their Body erect, this before the
Curfe might belong to the whole Kind of
them in another manner, than it doth fince
to any one Sort. The Bafilisk is faid to ga
with his Head and Breaft erect, and a Serpent
Call'd (p)inCVrM the Noya> will ftand with^^^V
half his Body upright for two or three hours ccjip**
together. (fyThefe may he for Monuments ic- 7-
•of the'Truthof the Curfe upon the reft; as^^S
fbme of the Race of the Giants were left in Ub\.m§i
the Land of Canaan, till Davits time, as a Me- xh*
morial to the lfraelites of the Miraculous
Power of God in the Conqueft of the Land
by their Forefathers.
The Curfe of the Ground was for a Punifh-
mAit to Jttam and his Pofterity, and can be
confidered no otherwife, nor be made matter
of Objection, unlefs it be thought unreafbna-
ble to inflict a Curfe upon Mankind for this
Offence qf eating the Forbidden Fruir, by
making the Earth lefs fruitful and pleafant to
them. Tho' the Garden of Eden were the
moft delightful and happy Part of the Earth,
yet the whole Earth before the Fall was very
different from what it has been fince. For if it
had
"% 5 6 The iRjafonablenefs dni Certainty
had continued as it was, the Curfe and Pu-
nifhment upon Mankind could not have been
effected in that manner, in which it was de-
termined.
2. Our Ffrft Parents were turned out of
Paradife, and not fuffered to tafte of the
Tree of Life. They had been charged no^
to eat of the Fruit in the midft of the Gar-
den, and Threa tried with Death, that is, that
they fhould become Mortal, and be fure to
die, if they would prefume to eat of it. To
be {iibject to Mifcry both in Bocy and Mind,
■lb' 'that the Body fhould decay, and at laft be
diffolved, and the Soul which ; could not Pe-
rifh fhould be miferable after its reparation
from the Body, was the Original Nction of'
Death ; and our Firft Parents, who had never
feen what Natural dying was, underftood
Death no otherwife. than as a Privation of
Happinefs, and confequently a State of Mile-T-
ry, both in this Life and the next: The fir-ft
was unavoidable, the latter to b$ avoidecLby
Repentance, and a future Obedience tnro*
Faith in God's Mercy for drift's fake.
They were hindred from tailing of that Tree
Which was to have been the Means and Inftru-
rhent of Immortality to them. For God who has
given a Medicinal Vertue and a Power of
Nourifhment to other Fruits and Herbs, might
convey a Power and Influence into this Tree,
of rendring Men Immortal by preventing the
decays of Nature, and Nourifhing or Streng-
then-
of the Cbriftian Religion. ^ y t
thniiig them to an endlefs Life. How this
fhould have been, we are now no more able to
know than to become immortal here upon
Earth ; But this was God's Decree, that Im
mortality fhould be annext to the taft'm-
that Tree, and therefore our Firft Parens,
when they, had incurred the Penalty of De^th,
were not fufFered to tafte of it, but were for-
ced out of Paradife, and it was juft that the^r
fhould be hindred from enjoying any longer
the Delights of Paradife, for the TranfgrciTion
of a Commandment, which wantpnnels onlv
and a vain and«crirhirial Curiofity, coujd make-
them difobey.
. We are able to give little more Accountjiow
theFoodwenoweat.cannourifh and fuflainus
from time to time for Threescore and Ten, or
Fourfcor.. Years, them 'now the Fruit of the
Tree of Life fhould have been a preservative
to keep Men alivje for ever*, only this we have
the Experience of, .and fo" fancy we can tell
how it comes to pate ; but that is ftrange to
us; and what isfti ..• >y]en wonder at, and
will hardiy believe it. But fince Gcd Las en-
dued our ordinary Food with a power of Noli- •
rifhiTicnt, no man can reafonably doul t bit • .
that lie might endue this Fruit with fuch a
Vertue, that itTOiouId have made men imrnor
tal to Tafte of it, and have prevented that decay
of Nature, which now frill creeps upon us in
the ufe of other Food. We may well fuppofc,
lhat if they had once tailed 'of this rWii,
S they
274 The G(eafonablenefs and Certainty
they fhould have fuffered no Decay, but have
lived in conftant Vigour here, tho' partaking
afterwards only of other Nourifhment, till
they had been tranflated to Heaven. -Or it
might be defign'd not as a Phyfical, but a Sa-
cramental Caufe of Immortality, that is, as a
Sign and Pledge of Immortality, God having
decreed that upon the Tailing of this Fruit,
Jdam and his Pofterity fhould have been im-
mortal. But the Forbidden Fruit being of a
moft delicious Tafte, as well as pleafant to the
Eyes, and containing a very fermenting Juice,
might "put the Blood and Spirits into great
Difbrder, and thereby diveft the Soul of that ■
Power and Dominion which it had before over
the Body,and by a clofer and more intimate Uni-
on with Matter, might reduce it to that re-
ferable Condition, which has been propagated
and derived down to Pofterity with the Hu-
mane Nature from pur Firft "Parents ; as lome
Poyfbns now ftrangely afFed the Nerves and
Spirits, without caufing immediate Death,
but make fuch Alterations in the Body, as are
never to be cured. And it could not be fitting
that Man fhould become immortal in this Con*
dition, or that the Threatning of God, how-
ever, fhould not take place.
From what has been hitherto faid upon this
Subject, I hope it is evident, that there can
be no neceffity of running to Allegorical In-
terpretations to explain the Fall of our Firft
Parents. And indeed all the Reafon that can
fee
/ •
of the Chrlflian Religion. j7 j
be given, why it is reprefented under an Alle-
gory, will rather prove the Litteral Senfe. For
if the Simplicity, and the Cuftoms, and Man^
iier df Life in the Beginning of the World did
require, that the Fall of our Firft parents
fhould be defcrib'd under an Allegory of this
Nature ; for the very fame Reafbns we may
fuppofe that the Fall was in this manper. For
What is it which makes itfeem improbable, but
only its being difagreeable, as fbme Men 'con-
ceit, to Reafon ? But if it be abfurd to fuppoffe
that fiich a thing fhould have been in the Be*
ginning of the World, why is it not a9 abfurd
that fuch a thing fhould be reprefented to thofe,'
wholiv'd at the beginning of the World, as if
it had been ? If this was then the moft fitting
and proper Reprefentation of the Fall; why
was it not the moft likely manner for it to hap-
pen by? Gods Difpenfations are always fitted
to the Capacities and Circumftances of thofe^'
who are moft concern'd in them, and the Devil
in his Temptations applies himfelf to the Cir-
cumftances of thofe, whom he would feduce i
And it cannot be conceiv'd, that the moft re-
markable Thing that ever*has befaln Mankind
( except the Redemption of the World by
Chrift) fhould fo come to pafs, as not to be told
to Pofterity, but in an Allegory. For if the Lit-
teral Truth had ever been known, it was im-
poffible it fhould be forgotten in fo few Gene**
rations, and that Mofes fhould put an Allege*
ry. in the room of it. Did the Children ol
Iftdtlknw the Hiftorical Truth of the Fall;.
% 2 4$
^jS Tlie (Rgafonablenefs and Certainty
or did they not know it? If th^y did, why
fhould Mofes difguife it under an Allegory,
rather than the reft of the Book of Gene-
fs? If they did not know it, how could it
be forgotten in (b few Ge is of Men,
fuppofing it had ever been known to Adams
Posterity ? If it Were never known, but dote
Relation of it were always conveyed down
in Metaphor and Allegory , then this Allegory
muft pais for Hiftorical Truth in thofe Ages ;
and the Reafon why it was delivered to
them in Allegory, rauft be, becaufe that manner
of delivering it, was molt fuitable to that
Age, and mod credible, and every way moft
proper ; and if it were moft fitting that it fhould '
he thought to hav(*happened fb, this is a good
Argument that it did really happen fo, fince
there is nothing hinders, but it might- fo have
happened, and it was moft probable at leaft
to the firft Ages of the- World, that it did fo
come to pafs, or elfe it would not have been
requifite to relate it in tl^s manner.
3. The Fall of cur Firft Parents brought a .
Curie upon their Pofteritv. /And here it muft
be acknowledg'd, t|^at God may beftow h2s
infinite Grace and Mercies upon what Terms
he pleafeth, and therefore he might ordain,
that the Happinefs or Unhappinefs of their
Pofteriry fnould depend upon the Obedience
or Difobedience of our Firft PareTnts.
(i.) God might ordain that the Gondjtion
of their Pofterity in this World fhould depend
upon
of the Cbrlfllan Religion. 177
upon it, fo that they fhould have been inv
mortal upon their Obedience, and fhould be-
come mortal upon their Dilobedience ; that
they fhould be made fubjecl to Cares and
Labours, to Difeafesand Dangers by reafonof
die Fall of our Firil Parents, from which, o*
therwife they fhould have been exempt. This
is efteem'd juit in all Governments amongft
Men, that Children fhould be reduced to Po-
verty and Difgrace by the Fault of their; Pa-
rents, from whom Riches and Honour were
to have ciefcended upon them : And this way
of Proceeding is juft, both in Humane Laws
and in the Difpenfations of Providence ; be-
caufe God and our Country .have an antece-
dent Right and Intereft in us, fuperior to any
Man's private Title or Welfare; and this they
may j jftly make ufe of to reft rain Men from
thpfe Crimes,- out of Love and Concern for
their Pofteritv, from which no confideration
of themfelves could have with- held them.
The- Experience of the World has found this
to be the meft effeftual Rcm'edy with many
Men, and therefore the wileft and jufteft Go-
vernments have made ufe of ir, and the mod
wife and juft God might think fi: to deal in
this manner with our Firfr. Parents, by repre-
fenting to them, that the Happinefs or Mifery
of their PoT^erity depended upon their Good
or i'l Behaviour in this one Inftance of their
Duty. We daily fee that Children common-
ly inherit the Difeafes of their Parents, and an
S 5 extra-
The ^eafonahlenefs and Certainty
extravagant and vicious Father leaves his Son
Heir to nothing but the Name and Shadow
perhaps of a Great Family, with an infirm and
fickly Conftitution, and little or nothing to
fupport and relieve it. Now if thele Mife-
ries and Calamities had been entail'd upon all
the Race of Mankind from Jdam, the thing
would have been the fame in the Nature and
Juftice of it ( for Numbers cannot alter the
Nature of Things as it is now, when they
defcend upon fome, only from their imme-
diate Parents. And therefore it muft be much
rather juft, that the Fall of our Firft Parents
fhould make their whole Race only liable to
fuch Calamities, but not involve All necefTari-
\y in them.
(2.) The Communications of God's Grace,
and the Favours and Bieffings of his more im-
mediate Pretence, might depend upon the Be-
haviour of the Firft Parents of Mankind. Hq
might fend them out of Paradile, and might
withdraw his free and ufual Communications
of himfelf from them and their Pofterity, up-
on this Forfeiture, by their Difbbedience.
3. The Pronencfs which we cannot but ob*
ferve in our (elves to Sin might proceed from
hence. We daily fee and feel the corruption of
our Nature, by whatfbever means we became
fubjccl to it. So that it is in.vaig to objeft,
that it would be unjuft that all Mankind
fhould be involv'd in Jddms Sin. For the
Condition which we are in, is matter of Fa£r,
of
of the Chrifttanfftglighn. 579
of which no^raan doth or can doubt: The
Queftion is only, how we come into this Con-
dition ; and flnce we are born' in it ; and it is
our Natural and Hereditary evil, the Juftice
and Goodnefs of God is cleared and vindicat-
ed, by afligning a Caufe for it ; from the Im-
putations of fuch as muft acknowledge the
fame corruption of Nature, but will allow no
Caufe or Reafbn for it, except the arbitrary
Will and Pleafure of the Creator. The Chil-
dren of vicious Parents are generally molt en-
clin'd to Vice; and if Men may partake of the
evil Difpofitions,>and Inclinations of their
more immediate Parents, why might not the
Corruption of the Humane Nature in our Firft:
Parents defcend upon all their Pofterity ?
( 4. ) The Happinefs of Men in the next
Life might depend upon the Obedience of
our Firft Parents. For when God propofed
to beftow upon Men Rewards of Glory and
Happinefs, which far furpafs any Pretences
of Defert or Claim of Right, that they in 3
State of Righteopfhefs and lnnocency could
have been able to make, fince the Promifes
were fb great and the Happinefs fo far ex-
ceeding any thing to which Men could pre-
tend a Right; we muft be very unreafona-
ble, unlefs we will confefs that God might
beftow his own Gifts upon his own Terms*
He might therefore debar Men from Heaven
upon the Tranfgreffion of our Firft Parents,
becaule the Promife of Heaven was an act
S 4 of
-? 80 : Tl?e fyeajonablenefs atftl fiertainty
of his free Bouncy. For no Mahiccan pretend
that an Innocent Creature which preferves its
Integrity, mull, for that Reafon, be advanced
to- the unfpeakable joys of Heaven. -IsJq
Creature can be profit die to his Maker, and
an unprofitable Servant can merit no fucli Re-
And what God was not obliged to.
•\v, tho' Men continued in the State of In-
. he might with all the Juftice and
Rea&ri in the World refu(e, when Men be-
. .v'v-ilcd of their Innocency, and there-
til pretences -to that Happincfs
was promiled upon condition, thatour
'I Parents had continued in their Primitive
and Orijjinaj State of Righteoufncfs.
5.) Goi\ might ordain that all Men mould
Lccohu to Eternal Miiery by the Fall
of our Fit 11 Parents, and. that thofe who
would not afceept of Means appointed of Sal*
ration by" Faith inChrifr, to fefcuc them from
ir, moulds*-' rn^Uy* W-e no looncr
1 Of the Fail of N&ari* bi t Chriit is
forthwith prpmifed, evc<n before the Curie
was denounced, upfln Adam ind Eve for their
I ofthe Woman is immediately
promifed to brnile the SepentsHead, and after-
wai Judgment is. denounced, firft up-
on Eve and then upon Adam for their Tranf-
tfrellion ; and the Seed of the Womaus brui"
iliuj tiic: Serptnr's Head, is to be underitood
victory over our Spiritual Enemies, and that
Cbnqucft which mould be obtained over
Death*
of the Chrlfthn (Religion. 381
Death and Hell by Chrift. For the Tempo-
ral Punifhment which was to befall. Adam
and Eve and their Pofterity, is afterwards
added, and therefore this Promife cannot be
underftood of a Deliverance from that, but;
from the wrath of God, and of Redemption
from Sin upon Repentance under whatever
condition of this Life. -
The Confequence of the Sin of our Firft
Parents is to entail Grief, and Troubie, and
Labour, and Pain upon their Pofterity, and a
trail and infirm Nature* expofed to Tempta^ •
tions, and deftitute of the Aids of Grace,
and the prefence of God in their Hearts, un-
capableof Heaven, and in no capacity of a-
voiding Hell without Chrift's Merits. But
Chrift was at that very time promifed to
take away all the Curie and Vengeance con-
fequent upon the TranfgreiTion of our Firft
Parents, nr.y, his Death was pre-ordained and
determined beforehand. For Chrift is the
Lmmb Slain from the Foundation of the World,
Jlev. xiii. 8. Who verily was fore ordained be-
fore the Foundation of the World. I Pet. i. 20.
He was Slain in the determinate CounfeJ, and
fore- knowledge of God, even before the Fall
of our Firft Parents came to pafs : the whole
Scheme and Defign of Man's Salvation was
laid from all Eternity in God's Counfel and
Decree, he forefaw that Man would fall, and
he determined to fend his Son to redeem him,
and this he had determined' to do (b long be*
Jore
■382 The ^eafonallenefs and Certainty
fore the Fall of Man, even by an eternal
Decree. So that the Goodnefs and Wifdom
of God had effectually* provided againft the
ill confluences, to the Salvation of Mankind
by the Fall in all that obey him ; and made
it imponrble that Adams Pofterity fhould be-
come eternally Miferable, and Tormented in
Hell Fire, but through their own Fault. For
tho' we learn from the Scriptures, that Infants
are by Nature born in Sin, and the Children of
Wrath, yet, whatever the Effects of that
Wrath may be, we have no Ground to con-
• elude, that any one .fhall be condemned, to.
the Flames and Pains of Hell, without his
own Perfonal and A&ual Guilt. The Re-
demption of the World by Chrift was de-
creed from Eternity, an<l was actually promi-
fed before any Child of Adam was born, and
even before the Curfe was denounced upon
pur Firft Parents, and a Remedy was from
the beginning provided againft. all that Mife-
ry, which was brought upon Mankind by
their Tranjgreflion,
■ „. -. *.■*** —
C H A P. XIV.
Of the Eternity oftiell Torments.
Here is nothing in Religion which has
been thought by many, more liable to
Obje-
T
of the Chrijiian (Religion. 38 j
Obje&ions than the Eternity of Hell Toiv
ments : And yet I fhall undertake to prove
that they are plainly confident, not only with
the Juftice, but with the Equity and Mercy
of God,
I. I fhall prove the Eternity of Hell Tor-
ments to be confident with the Juftice of
God from thefe Arguments, j. Becaufe both
Rewards and Puuifhments are alike propofed
to dur Choice. 2. Becaufe the Rewards are
Eternal as well as the Punifhments. 3. Be-
caufe it was . necefTary that the Sanction of
the Divine Laws fhould be by Eternal Re-
wards and Punifhments. (4) Becaufe it is nece£
fary that Eternal Punifhments fhould be infli-
cted upon the Wicked, according to this Saxh
c~tion.
1. Both Rewards 'and Punifhments are a-
like propofed to our Choice. It is certainly
confident with Infinite Juftice, to fet before
Men Life and Death, Blefting and Curfing,
and then to deal with them according to
their own Choice. And none will fall into a
State of Everlafting Mifery, but fuch as fhall
be convinced in their own Conferences of
the Juftice of God's Proceedings with them:
And this conviction will prove one great
part of their Punilhment, when they fhall
. confider that they Perifh only by their own
Fault, that they were wilful and obftinate
to their own Ruine; that no Promifes, no
Threats
The ^eafonablenefs and Certainty
•Threats could reclaim them. And this is all
. the itnctdt juttice cm require, to deal
\yl h Men according to their own Choice, to
let thetiichufe their own Condition of Hap-
pinefs or Mifery, and to proceed in fuch a
manner with S v-ieis, a, that they (hall be
convinced ciiCn'd'-ivcb that there is no Inju-
(tjee done tj
2. The Re are Eternal as veil as
the Punifhments.. If the Rewards on , the
-.ot born a jail: proportion
to the- Punifhtiietlis on the other, the Caufe
had been different,, and it had feemed hard
to fufFer Eternal Torments for a friort Life
of Sin, if there had not been Eternal Hap-
pitiefs propofed to as fhort a Life of Ver-
afld* Rightcoufhefs. But fince the Re-
vvards and the Punifhments are equal, it is
t heceflary that tliere fhould be an exact
p/oportion between the Offence and the Fu~
fufhment confidered in ;t felf, and without
ie£c had to the Rewards; becaufe the Re-
irti being EteVfial, anlwersthe oppofite Pu-
is other Part. Thus Men are
WcVnt to let fo much Lcfs ajainft ib. much
n ', and no Man pries him that might have
tied as much as he has loll, if it had not been
own Fault, tho'the lofs be never Co great,
pendecl upon never io fmall £nd fhort
*v i
.j i i yah
It may fefern an hard Cafe, that a Man
aid loie iiis Life for but going out of a
City,
of the Cbriftian Religion. 387
City, when he could do no hurt by .it; nor in-
tended to clo any : and this was the Cafe of
Shimei ; but he had forfeited his Life before
to ttavid, whojiad fparM ; and he had been
afterwards engag'd, it feaiis, in other ill, Piu-
clices, and had probably been eoncern'd with
Joab and others in letting up SJdonijafj, ( for
it was another Shimei, the Son of ELtJh of
Whom it is laid, that he was not with Ado-
mjxh. 1 Kjngs i- 8. iv. 18.) and David gives
Solomon the fame Direction concerning thele
two Men. 1 Kjn& n* 5> ^- Solomon therefore .
Fets him this Condirion, and he was to expe&
to live upon no other Terms, but his keep-
ing within thefe Bounds, which by the Coir
fellion of 'Shimei himfeif was a good faying.
1 KjngiW. 38. that is, he was glad of it, and
Could expect no kinder Ufage. And if Solo- '
mon had propofed fbme great Reward to him*
upon Condition, that he had kept within the
City, he had been . not only m(f, but very
gracious and bountiful :o him in it* I am
confident any coridemn'd Malefactor would •
think fq. The Cafe of Mankind is like this,
but infinitely more gracious on* God's part.
and more provoking on on; s. The very beil
of us were in Sin, and have often forfeited-
our Silvation to the Divine juftice ; and God
by his Soveieign Power and Authority over
us might have pfopojed any Terms of Recon-
ciliation : But he has been pleated to appoint,
that our everlaflmg State of Mappings oc
Mifery
%%6 The <%eafonablenefs and Certainty
Mifery fhould depend upon the Moral Terms of
Vertue andVic^,and to fet everlafting Happinefs
agaixft everlafl ingMiferyjand no man {ball be fen-
tenced toHelTForments,but he might have been
as happy as he fhall find I 1 imfel f to be miferable:
W) fa Both the W Jews and ^ Heathens nad a
xxxiii. 14. Notion of eternal Rewards and Punifhments,
ixvi.'24; as well as Chriftians ; and the eternity of the
Din. xn. jattfT was t^Q great Impediment, which Epi-
(b) pJat. curus endeavour'd to remove out of the way,
lufretib* t0 tne ^ree EnJ°yment °f Men's Lufts. For
i.v. 112. whatever (bme have laid in behalf of Epcu-
Diog. li- r„s<) his own word produced Q) by Tulfy, too'
{bag*nceif. P^11 t0 De evaded, (hew, that he did place
Hift. Na- all Happinefs in fenfual Pleafures, only he wa$
jr?j/' c° w^un& t0 enjoy them as quietly and fecurely
16. icr/j as he could, and for this Reafon laid down
apud 6ri- divers Rules by way of expedient to keep the
5£ ^"„'M«id in Peace, void of all Auxiety in this
gtr de la Life, and of all Hopes or Fears of a future
^fL«r*des ^tate ? ^he prevailing Belief of the eternal
des En- Punifhments of wicked Men after Death was
nines, c. enough toruine all his Philofbphy ; and there-
*(x)THfcJore l^lis was. ^y a^ means to be removed,
2tu.iib.iiL which yet he was never able to effect. So
that this was -a thing fufficiently known to
make all men fenfible of what they muft ex-
pect would be the conlequence of Sin. And
what God has threatned lb long before, and has
igiven Men time, and Opportunity, and Abi-
lity to avoid, they cannot fall under, but thro"
their own Wilfulnefs and Misbehaviour, and
can
tf the Cbriftian Religion. 5S7
can have no reafbn to complain, when it
comes upon them.
£: It was neceffary that the Sanction of the
Divine Laws fhould be by eternal Rewards and
Punifhments.The Sanction of all Laws is by Re-
wards and Punifhments, and the Defign of ap-
pointing Punifhments is to affright Men from
Sin, as the end of Rewards is to invite them
to Obedience. The only true Meafure and
juft Proportion therefore between the Crime
.and the Punifhment, is the fuitableneis of the
Punifhment to enforce Obedience to the Law,
and caufe it to be duly oblerved. For if the
Law be good and neceffary, and cannot be fb
well and fb effectually obeyed without a very
fevere Punifhment to enforce it ; the Severity
of the Punifhment is fb far from Cruelty, that
it is a juft and wife Provifion to fecure Obedi-
ence to the Law, and procure all the Good de-
fign'd by it. Thus we always judge in Hu-
mane Laws: A man is condemnd to lofe his
Life for taking from another that, which he-
perhaps could very well fpare ; but we are all
agreed in the Juftice of making fuch Examples,
becanfe^we find that Men 'can fcarce be fecure
in tjieir Lives and Eftates, notwithftanding
the Severity of fuch Laws. And if the Ter-
rors of everlafting Torments will not frighten
Men from Sin, what effed would a lefs Punifh-
ment denounced have had upon them ? If
men can but once perfwade themfelves that the
Torments of Hell are not fo terrible, they* free-
ly
8 8 The u{eafonab/ene(s And Certainty
ly give thcmfelves up to all Licentioufnefs t
and we know how fond Men of wicked Lives
are of fuch Doctrines. God therefore perfect-
ly unuerftanding the Temper and Inclination,
the Stnbbornefs and Pcrverfenefs of Mens
Hearts, fb prone toVice, and lb back ward to all
that is good; forefaw that a lei's Pu.mfhment
threatned would not prevail with Men to for-
fake their Sins, and get to Heaven.
And with what Face can that Man object
that the Torments of Hell are too great and in-
tolerable, who, as terrible as they are, lives-
ftill fecure and undifturb'd in his Sins? If they
are fo great that he complains oi» them, as;
unjuft, Why doth he not leave -his Sins? If he
doth not forfake his Sins, they are not too
great, fince they have not attained that End
upon him, for which the Punifhment is de-
nounced, viz. his Repentance and Amend-
ment of Life 1 But if he doth not believe their
Eternity, and therefore continues in "his Sins,
this fhews, how neceiTary the Denouncing,
and how neceiTary the Belief of eternal Pu-
nifhments is- Out of thine own Month will I
judge thee, thou wicked Servant '. Thou kneweft
that I was an aujlere Man, wherefore then didft
thou not do as thou waft commanded ?
4. It is neceiTary that eternal Punifhments ■
fhould be inflicted upon the Wicked accord-
ing to the Sanction of the Divine Laws by s-
ternal Rewards and Punifhments. We find
by fad Experience, how little effect the Pu-
' niftl-
of the Chriftian Religion* 557
nifhtnents now threatned have upon too ma-
ny Men, *and if they were lefs dreadful they
would be lb much the Ids regarded. Sa
that it appears, that the appointment of
eternal Punifhments was but necefTary to keep
Men from Sin, and what God's Wifdom faw
heceflary to appoint, his Juftice and Truth
will make it neceflary for him to infliQ: : For
what he has fo often and ib folemnly decla-
red, he can never depart from, but will cer-
tainly execute it. The Promifes and Threats
nings relating this Life are conditional, and
are exprefly declared to be fb,' Jer- xviii. 7,
8, 9, 10. becaufe in this Life Men are change-
able from Good to Bad, or from Bad to Good ;
but the Threatnings as well as the Promifes
concerning the other Life muft be abfblute
and unconditional, becaufe they relate to an
unchangeable final State, which will admit of
no alteration either in the Wicked or the
Righteous. It is not therefore becaufe God
Can recede from his Threatnings rather than
from his Promifes ; that >Njneveh was (pared,
but becaufe all Threatnings belonging to the
State of this Life imply a condition of Re-
pentance, upon which they are not to be in-
flicted, as Jonah and the Nimvites themfelves
well underftood: but then allPromifes too, which
concern thisLifeare under the like conditioned
are not to be performed upon the Oifobedience
of thofe, to whom they are made, as we are
aiTured by God's exprefs Declaration, But
T ivha$
} j 6 The ^cafonxblenefs and Certainty
what is threatned or promifed to Men to be-
fall them after this Life, is promifed or threat-
ned to befall them, when they fhall be in a
fixt unalterable State, and therefore* rauft be
unc-pable of any Condition or Referve to be
implied in ir. For when Men continue the
fame they were at the time when God's Pro-
mifes and Threatnings were declared to them,
his Promifes and Threatnings always take
place in this World according to the full
extent and importance of the "Words in
which they were delivered ;. and therefore
they muft thus take place in the next World,
into which , when Men are once entred ,
they muft for ever continue equally fit
Objects either of the Divine Promifes or Threat-
nings, as they were at the time of their Death.
The Point is, that God never changes, but
Men are changeable in this Life ; md both his
Promifes and Threatnings, which concern Men
here, fuppofe them fuch, and therefore Re-
wards are with-held, or Punifbments remitted
in this World, as, Men fall into Wickednefs,
or become reclaim'd from it. But in the other
World, where the State of Men is unalterable
from good. or bad, vert uo us or vicious, both
the Promifes and Threatnings of God muft be
punctually fulfilled, and can admit of no Con-
dition or Refervation. God has fworn that
thofe, who •will not believe and obey him,
(hall not enter into bis Reft. Heb. iii. 18. and
what he has once fworn is irrevocable. Heb.
vi.
of the Chriftian %eligion. -%c^
Vl. 1 7. If we belfe've not, yet be abi'deth faith'
ful, he cannot deny himfeif 2 Tim. ii. I}. And
it is not only threatned that the Wicked fhall
fuffer eternal Punifhment, but it is likewife
exprefly foretold, that the wicked fhall be fen-
tenced to ever lofting fire at the Da£ of Judg-
ment, and that they fhall go away into everlaft-
ingT?uni(hment. Matth. xxv. 41, 46. To leave
no room» for hopes of any End or Abatement
of the Punifhment, we have our Saviour's ex-
prefs Declaration, that the Sentence fhall be
paft according to the Threatning, and that
the eyerlafting Punifhment which is threat-
ned, fhall be certainly executed upon the.
wicked. Our Judge has beforehand declar'd,
what Sentence he will pafs, the Terms where-
of are therefore as unalterable, as if it were
already pronounc'd. He has declared that the
Punifhments of the wicked, as well as the
Rewards of the righteous 'fhall be eternal,
as ^irecl:ly and poflitively as he has faid any
thing elfe' relating to the laft Judgment, or -
concerning any other part of his Gofpel, and
we have as little reafon to imagine that his
exprefs and repeated Affirmation is capable
of a referved Meaning in this particular, as
in any other matter whatfoeyer.
Some of the Benefits and Advantages which
are confequent to ,the Punifhments of this
World are precedent to thofe of the , next :
Here Men are ptmifhcd for their own Amend*
taent, or for the Advantage and Security of
T 2 . others-
j^So The <%eafonahlenefs and Certainty
others or for both : In the* next World the
a&ual inflicting of Punifhments is not for
thefe encls, but they were threatned for thefe,
and they muft be inflicted when they have-'
been once threatned and declared by God,
who cann<5t lye. It is for the Repentance of
Sinners, and for the Benefit of Good Men in
preferving them in the ways of Vertue, and -
fecuring them*from the Pride and Malice of
the Wicked that Hell fhould be threatned;
but hecaufe it is 'the final and eternal State
of the Wicked, it cannot be for their Amend*
ment after the Execution of its Torments up-
on themy and Good Men being once out of
the Power of Temptations, and placed be-
yond t e Malice of the Wicked, can no lon-
ger have any Protection or Advantage from
the Punifhments denounced againft impeni-
tent Sinners ; but whether the Advantages a-
rifing from Punifhments be before or after
the inflicting of Punifhments, there is jthe
lame neceMity for the appointing, Ihd confe-
quently for' the inflicting them, viz. The
Good of Mankind in keeping Men from Sin,
and leaving thofe without excufe who will not
be reftrained from it, and work out their own
Salvation. But another end of Punifhment is,that
Satisfaction for the violation of the Laws
may be made to thefupreme Authority which
is defpifed and affronted by it : And the vin-
dication of God's Honour and*Authorityj and
of his Truth and Hoiinefs in his Hatred and
De-
of the Cbriftian Religion. j<$i
Deteftation of Sin, and his indignation a-
gainft Sinners, is manifefted by the a&ual Pu- .
nifhments of the Damned, and it would be
an Argurhent of the contrary to all this, if
they were threatned and not inflicted.
And the Number of Perfons to be thus
Punifhed doth not alter the Cafe, but only
fhews that many are concerned in it ; and
if the cafe be the lame, the Juftice muft be
the lame too, tho' the Perfons be never fb
many upon whom it is executed . That which
is- Juft towards one, or Merciful towards one,
is Juft or Merciful towards never, fo many
Thoufands. For Juftice and Mercy confift in
the Nature of things, not in the greater or letter
Number of Perfons- to whom they are extend^
ed. And tho' Multitudes of Criminals are
apt to move companion in Men; yet this
proceeds 'partly from the Sympathy and Frail-
ty.of Human Nature, which is mightily fway-
ed by Number and Multitude to do either
Good or Evil f partly from the Nature of Hu-
man Affairs: For to deftroy Multitudes would
depopulate Cities and Countries, and would
be an Affliction to Multuudes of Inno-
cent Perfons, their Friends and Relations. But
it is not fo in the prefent Cafe; there will
be no want of Numbers in Heaven, and the
Righteous fhall be Everlaftin ;iy happy, and
lhall perceive no diminution of their Happi-
nefs by reafon of the damnation of fiich as
were never fo dear to them, in this VVorld.
T 3 And
The ^eafonablenefs mi Certainty
And Mercy and Pity is not a Paffion in Gfod as
it is in Men, but a Perfection, it is the higfteft
Reafon and Equity ; and therefore tho' the
Mifery of Sinners be never fb fevere, and
the number of the Miferable never To great ;
yet when the Equity and reafonablenefs of
the cafe doth not require it, there is nothing
to move God for their Relief, becaufe he acts
by the ftanding*Rule$ of Reafon and Wifdom,
not by any Fondnefs and Weaknefe of Paf-
fion. .
2. I come now to fhew the Mercy of God
in his inflicting Eternal Torments upon Sin-
ners. Strict Juftice has a fevere Afpect, and
it may feim hard for frail Man to abide the
Sentence, that he may in ftrictnefs of Juftice
deferve. But from the Juftice of God it is
natural for us to appeal to his Mercy, and
thither he allows us to appeal, but not fo,
as to expect that he fhouid be fo merciful
as not to be juft, or fhouid forget that he is
the Supreme Governour of the World, whilft
he extends his Mercy to the Offending and
Criminal part of ir. ' Punifhment is Decenary
to all Government, and God as Governour of
the World rauft inflict Funifliments, and what
thcfe are to be, it belongs to his Sovereign
Wifcicrn to appoint* I
And Eternal Torments were appointed for
the Puniflhment of Sin, not only out of a ve-
ry juft, but even out of a gracious Defign, be-
caufe nothing lels thanfiie Threatnings of „thera
would
of the Chriflian Religion. %6y
would keep Men from Sin, and from that Mi-
lery which is the unavoidable confeque^ce of
it, and Co bring them to Heaven. It is an ,^ c, .
Arftient and true Obfervation which («) St. adsugh.
Cbryfostom has made, that there is Mercy e- Jib'l*ToZ'
ven in the threats of Eternal Vengeance,^
becaufe nothing' left could have brought ma-
ny*Men to Heaven. For there is no doubt
to be made but many will be there, -who fhall
have caift to thank God for this,- as the thing
which firft opened their Eyes, and' moved
them to Repentance, and thereby brought
them to Bjifs and Glory. And the fafte^ Mer-
cy was extended to thofe that Perifri, and
would not make the fame ufe of it, which if
they had done they had never perifhed : Tho'
Heaven and Hell (/^Jays St. Chryfojlow, be
contrary to each other, yet they both aim at afrZt
the fame end, the Salvation of Mankind, the tioch.. de
•Joys of Heaven invite Men to it, and the{^w*
Fear of HeJI forces thofe to Heaven, who o-
therwife would be regardlefs of their own
Happinefs.
God has ufed the moft proper and prevail-
ing Meaiis to convince Sinners of their Dan-
ger, ana to perfwSde them to efcape it, and
obtain Salvation. We have everlafting Re-
wards and everlafting Punifhments propofed
to our Choice ; We* are exhorted with the
greatefr. Earneitnefs, and mov'd and affifted
with the continual Influences and Aids of
Grace, to avoid the Punifhments, and are as
T 4 ear-
164 Tkefyeafonablenefs and Certainty
earneftly invited, and as fufficiently enable^ to
obtain the Rewards. God hath no pleafure in
the Death of the Wicked : but that the rvicjted
turn from hi* way and live, as he folemnly and
with an Oath declares by his Prophet, Ezekiel
xxxiii- ii. It is His principal Intention and
Defire, that all Men fhould be faved : He faas
proclaimed Himfelf to be the Lord, The Lord
God, merciful and gracious, long- f it jf Ming, and
abundant in goodnefs and truth, keeping Mercy
for Thouf&nds, forgiving Iniquity, and Tranf-
grefflon^ndSin; but then it is added, that he
ivillby.no means clear the guilty, that is, the ob*
ftinate and impenitent Sinner. Exod. xxxiv.
6,7. He exhorts, he invites, he promifes, he
threatens ; he promifes eternal Happinefs, and
threatens eternal Miferj^ to give all the Dif-
couragement to Vice, and all the Enducement
to Religion and Vertue which is p<3flible.
Laftof all, he has fent his Son toinftrucl: us in
our Duty, and to confirm all this \o us, and
to purchafe our Redemption with his own
Blood.
God deals with Men in the plainer! and
moft condefcending manner, He lafs their
Duty before them with the Rewards and Pu-
nifhments annex'd, and both eternal, the bet-
ter to fecure them in their Obedience, and
force them to be happy : and then he takes
Men at no Advantage, but makes allreafbnable
Allowances, in confideration of the frailty of
Humane Nature, and in condefcenfion to their
Inflr-
of the ChriftianQ{eligi6n. 365
Infirmities'; He exacts not abfolute Perfection,
nor any impoflible Obedience, but requires,
that, tho' we cannot live without Sin, yet we
fhould not fin wilfully and obftinately ; that
we fhould not allow and indulge our felves in
Sin, and fhoujd repent if We have done lb ;
He requires a faithful and fitocere Diligence in
all the Parts of our Duty, which is no more
than what every Father and Mailer expects
from his Children and Servants: When Men
have finned, God admits of their Repentance,
and if afcer Repentance they (in again, yet
Hill they fhall be accepted upon a renewed
Repentance : nay, after a long courfe of Sin,
a fincere Repentance may reconcile them to
God, and no Repentance can be too late, that
is fincere. It is extreamly dangerous indeed
to defer our Repentance for one Moment,
becaufe our Lives are fo uncertain, and we may
provoke God to that degree, that he will no
longer afford us an Opportunity to repent, nor
bellow that Grace upon us, which is neceflfary
to "Repentance.. But this is after repeated pro**
vocations,' and an obftinatc rejecting of the
Goodnels of God, which leads Men to repen-
tance : And tnefe are the Terms of the Go-
fpel, that- when the wicked Man turneth away
from his Wickcdnefs that he hath committed, and
doth that which is lawful and right, he Jha/l five
his Soul alive. There is Great Joy in Heaven
over one Sinner that repentethy and the* return-
ing Prodigal is received with tjie greatejd Fa-
vour
*| 66 The <%eafonabfe>ieJs and Certainty
vourand Tendernefs. If .we will be obedient,
we have the Afliftance of God's G ace, and if
we have done amifs, yet His grace is offered
us to bring us to Repentance, and we may
be pardoned upon fincere Refblutioris flf Obe-
dience for the future. But if Men either dif-
believe or difregard all thefe fhings, if they
neither care for God's Promifes, nor fear his
Threatnings ; if they trample under foot the
Blood of his Son, and grieve his blerTed Spirit;
if all the Methods of his Mercy and Goodnefs
be loft upon them, there remains no other
Remedy, but Juftice muft have its courfe. Jf
when they are told fb long beforehand, what
danger they are in, Men will continue obfti-
nate in their Difobedience, after fb many In-
vitations and Encouragements to Repentance,
and after fo great Importunity and Forbear-
ance; thev can have no reaibn to complain of
the Severity of that Sentence, which they
have been fo often threatned with, and have
as often defpifed.
Since the Rewards are eternal on the one
hand, and the Punishments on the other, the
Rewards being proportionable to the Punifh-
rncnts, the Terms are on both fiaes equal ; and
(ince it is in our Power by the Help of the
Divine Grace to avoid the Punifhments and
obtain the Rewards, the Condition is iuch,
as that any wife Man would be thankful for
Jr, and would be glad that fuch a Prize is put
into his hands ; fo far would he be from com-
plain*
of the Chrifiian (Religion. 36?
plaining, that the Terrors of Punifhments
are join'd to the Encouragement of Rewards;
that all Motives concur to make him happy,
and that God has ufed all means both inward
by his Grace, and outward by his Promifes
and Threatnings to bring us to Salvation.
I repeat it again, for God himielfpften re-
peats it in the Holy Scriptures ; God hath no
Pleafure in the Death of the Wicked, but hath
ufed all means to prevent it, he hath provided
Heaven for us, and threatned Hell, if we will
not be perfwaded to go to Heaven. If Men
will neglect the Me'ans of their Salvation, and
will not repent and turn to him, notwith-
standing all his moft loving and companionate
Exhortations, and the Death of his own Son
for them, if neither Heaven can invite, nor
Hell frighten them from their Sins, they muft
thank themfelves only for that Ddtru&ion,
which they bring upon themfelves. The Ap-
peal which God fb long ago*made to the JHoufe
of Ifraely may at the laft Day be alledg'd* to'
Sinners. Ye have faid, that the way of the
l2rd is not equal Hear now, O ye Sinners,
Is not my way equal, have not your ways been
unequal? And the ways of God (hall then
appear (b equal, and the ways of wicked Men
fo unrealbnable ana1 perverfe, that their own
Confciences fhall bear Witnefs againd them;
and He that died to fave them will pronounce
the Sentence of eternal Damnation upon
them.
CHAP.
4& The ^eafonahlenefs and Certainty
CHAP. xv.
Of the Jewifh Law.
THere is nothing which vulgar Minds are
more fufprifed and offended at, nor at
which Men of Underftanding and Experience
are lels enclin'd to wonder or take Offence,
than the feveral Laws and Cuftoms of divers
Nations in the different ,Age£ and Climates
cf the World : The Habit, the Language,
the Letters, and manner of Writing ; the
Food, the Complexion, the Features of the
Body, and Difpoiition of the Mind are various
in different Countries and Ages. And there-
lore it is no wonder that the Political and
Ceremonial Part of the Jew/Jh Law, which
Was given ib many Ages ago, and in a Coun-
try, which is at this Day very different in its
Cuffoms from ours, fhould be as different
from the Cuftoms in ufe amongft us, as the
Age and Climate. For when God doth ap-
point Laws for Men, he muff be fuppofed to
appoint tucb as are fuitable to the Neceffities
and Occafions of thofe for whom they are
Riade. Arid fbme who have travelled into the
Eaftern
of the Cbrijlian Religion. ^
Eaftern Countries, which are not fb variable
in their Fafbions and Way of Living, as the
Weftern Nations" are> have found great ad-
vantages both from the Nature of tjie Inha-
bitants, and of the Climates, and from the
Cuftoms and Manners of thofe Parts of the
World, for the explication of divers places of
Scripture,* which depend upon the knowledge
of thofe Countries.
Now the w"hole Jewifi Law may be divi-
' ded into the Moral, the Political or Judicial,
and the Ceremonial Law. The Moral Part of
Mofess Law, which is contain'd in the Ten
Commandments, and enjoy ns our Duty to-
wards God and towards our Neighbour, is
juft and holy beyond all Controverfy or Ex-
ception. And the Political or Judicial Part
with the Ceremonial was adapted to the Cir-
cumftances and Neceffityes of thofe Ages and
that Nation. And if the Moral Part be ab-
folutely moft Divine and Holy, and the Posi-
tive Inftitutions 'both Political and Ritual,
were the moft tit and proper for that Time and
Government ; that is, if they were the beft
that could be, for thofe Ages and that Peo-
ple ; then the whole Body of the Mofaick K
Law is without all juft Exception. And that
this is fb, it will be evident; if we obferve
the Reafbns upon which the Pofitive Laws
amongft the Jews were inftituted.
i. The Judicial Laws, relating to the Ad-
miniftration of Juftice in the Jcmjb Govern-
ment
370 The ^eafonablenefs and Certainty
ment, are lb reafofiable, that they have been
tranfcrib'd into the Laws of the wifeft Hea-
then Nations, as hath- been particularly (hewn
by Learned Men. There are but few of the
Judicial Laws which have been objected a-
gainft, and thefe have been often and effectu-
ally vindicated. The Law which feems mod
harfh and rigorous is that of Retaliation ;
which yet was the moll antient way of Pu«
nifhment in moft Nations, and was not un-
juft for the Laws to intiicl:, tho' it was (infill- in
thePerfbns injured to require it out of a Defire of
Revenge, and with a Delight to gratify therh-
felvesin their Enemies Sufferings. For if it
be juft to punifh the taking away of a little
Money with Death, how can it be u'njuft to
infli£t the fame Puni.fhment for the depriving
a Man of his Eye? And if it be not unjuft
to make Death the Punifhmentof ftriking out
an Eye (and what Nation doth not«punifh
much lefs Injuries with Death?) How can it
be unjuft to punifh the Offender #with the Lofs
of his own Eye? One of the fevereft Laws
that ever was known amongft a civilifed
People, was that of the Twelve Tables, which
(*) Silht gave leave to (a) the Creditors among the Ro*
fim"*'mam to divide the Debtor's Body between
dam non t»i • e
hiidabiiia them, ir he were lnlolvent : 1 his was one or.
Natura, thofe things which are not commendable iri
fed jure D
conceffa : -tit in xii Tabulis Qebitoris Corpus in^r Creditores tlividi Ii-'
cult* quam legem mos Publicusrepudiavk. Qaintil, Inftitut. lib. iii.'
cap. 6.
theif
of the Chriftkn Religion. 37*
their own Nature, but yet are allow d and
permitted, as QuintUUn has obferv'd upon
particular Reafons : but this Law was laid a-
iide by a general Difufib, and (b) that of Re- (b) ilghf.
taliation among the Jews was interpreted by %°£ 2"
them, according t<a an Antient Tradition, to Mat. v.
be meant not of ftri& Retaliation, 'but of a 38.
Compenfation to be made in Money to the • , ♦
Perfon maimed.
2. Many of thofe Rites which may feem .
ftrange to us, were fo far from being efteem'd
abfurd, that they became common in thofe
Countries, as Circumcifion wayantiently, and
is to this day pra&ifed in many Parts of the
World ; (c) the ^Egyptians and many other (c) am.
Nations abftain'd from Swines Flefh, and the ** Lev.xi,
ALtbiopians from mod: of the Meats which t^
were forbidden the Jews *, fuch Abftinenqies
being necelTary for Health in thofe Countries.
Frequent Wafhings likewife are requifite in ' •
hot Countries for Health and Refrefhment;
Religion prefcrib'd only the Time,and Manner,
and particular Occafion of it, the Thing it
felf is Natural. And when we fee fuch a
Body of Laws of fo great Antiquity, well
contriv'd and wifely inftituted for the Sub*
ftance of them ; if there be in fome of then*
any thing peculiar and fingular ; tho' they
were but the Laws of a Man, yet common
Modefty and Candor might make us conclude,
that fo wife a Lawgiver muft have fbme good
Reafbn for thofe particular Lato, which at
this
$ 7 2 The %ea[dnctblene[s and Certainty
this diftance of Time and Place cannot be Co
■ obvious to us; but it would ^e Rafbnefs to
* lufpe£fc that he had no fufRcient Reafon for
thole, who appears tq have ena&ed the reft
with fo great Wifdom. Thus it would be na-
tural for a Man of tolerabjs Modefty to con-
clude, even concerning a Svftem of Humane
.Laws, tho' no probable Account could be
given of many of them. Bur when God is
the Lawgiver, this ought to filence all Dis-
putes, that they are his Laws, and there-
fore muft be wife and good for « that People,
at that Time,*and in their Condition and Gfr-
cumftanccs. The Will and Authority of God,
without any other Reafon, is Sufficient of it
lelf, in any Cafe. to bealledg'd, and it may be
, fit in fome Cafes, that we fhould have no o-
ther Reafon to produce.
It is a rafh and dangerous thing to con-
clude, that God did not command this or that,
becaufe we do not fee why it fhould be com-
manded ; this is to fay, that we will not be-
lieve God to be the Author of any thing
which wc do not like, or would not have to
be His. Are we wont toargue thus about Hu-
mane Laws? Would it be any Excufc- for a
difobedient Subject to fay, that in his Opinion,
fuch Laws were not fit to be made, and that
therefore he would not believe his Prince had
made fuch Laws; when he had all due notice
and full evidence , that he had appointed
them, but was refolved to reje£l: the whole
Body
of the Chriftian (Religion. 341
Body of Laws upon the account of fbme which Cd) Sun*
he did not fancy, which yet were obfblete and ^ihaec^
out of Date? Do we not allow that Reafbns eft: quem-
of State and of Government may require ma.^™
ny things to be done, and many Laws to bedencibus
made, which it doth not belong to private tibi dixi,
Men. to be curious about, and which the great- & Ss*
eft Part of the Subje&s are not able to com- zabiorum
prehend? And are not God's Thoughts infi- ^iee(ff
nitely above the Thoughts of the Wifeft Men, incogni-
and infinitely farther out of our Reach, thantdS; ita
the Counfels of the moft Prudent and Poli- iS£en0j
tick Prince can^>e above the Underftanding of Hiftoria
his meaneft and moft ignorant Subje&s ? How ^™fc$
fhall we dare then to reject any Divine Reve- rum iiio-
lation, becaufe it is not agreeable in every n»m.Qpal
particular to our Thoughts and Notions ofin^Vmnt-
things? But I fhall enquire however into theaque par-
Reafons and Grounds, which appear to- us at™^,
this diftance of Time for the Ceremonial Laws, lis tempo-
and I doubt not but thtfe will be fufficient to JibusJcci*
Juftify them to all impartial Men. „ow" eft
1 . The Ceremonial Laws were given the fent cog-
Jews to prevent them from falling into Ido- "a^111*
latry. For they were defign'd to diftinguifh quoque in
the Jews in many things from the Neighbour- le£e divi-
ing Nations, and to' hinder them from follow- J^rtkuiL
ing their Idolatrous Cuftoms. And the Oi« rium rati-
ftoms of the CO People of 7/w/, and of thej$j^£
Nations round about them, and the leveral Maimon.
forts of Idolatry pra&iled amongft the &gy-l'}0X*VQr'
j^tUns and QMatnites muft needs render the'V^*
U par*
$4* The %enfonabhnefs and Certainty
particular occafions and grounds of thofe
Laws, which were made to reftrain them from
Idolatry, difficult to be underftood by all who
are unacquainted with the Rites and Idola-
trous Worfhipof thofe Nations. But of thofe
Laws it is enough for ordinary Readers to
know, that they had refpeft to the idolatries
then pra&ifed amongft the bordering Nations^
and this the Scripture often tells us. Lev.
Xviii. }. xx. 2$, 24, 25. Deut. xii. }o, j'l. xiv.
(x)fr& 1,2. xviii. 9. (*)Origen has obferved, that
io^ttaCei/. thofe Beafts were by the Law of Mofes de-»
,v* clared to be unclean, by whicfc the ALgyptians
and other Heathen Nations were wont to make
their Divinations, and that mod befides were
allow'd of as clean. And other Particulars
have been made out by Learned Men from
the beft Remains of Antiquity.
And as the Jews were taught to look upon
the Idolatrous Nations as polluted, and had
Laws given them purpofely to hinder them
from too dangerous a freedom and familiarity
with Idolaters ; fo thefe Laws might be eali-
ly practifed when they lived within them-
felves, feparated from other People, but are
now become impracticable fince they are dik
perted amongft all Nations, and the Laws
which were adapted to the State and Circum-
ftancesof the Jemjb Nation and Government,
muft be out of Date, fince the Diffolution of
their Government and the Difperfion of the
rtrholc People into other Countries. Thefe
Laws
of the Chri ft ian. Religion* t^i
Laws may well frem ftrange now to us, when
they pretend to practiie them, but this ought to
be attributed not to the Laws themfelyes, buc
to their Adherence to thern when the Obligati-
on to oblerve them is fo long . fince expired,
and when the People of the Jews are in a con-
dition in which many of their Laws can-
not, and others were never defigned to be ob-
ferved. Some (x) of their Rabbins have held (x\<3tni
that things forbidden by the Law might \>saiAa,x'
eaten by them out of the Land of Judex ; and I5'
the Reafbn why Daniel refuted to Eat of the
Kjfigs Meat and Drink of his Wtney was, becaule
it was the Cuftom of (e) Antient Times, and ^ Grof',
particularly in thofe Countries, to conicerate all ai oan. i. .
which they did either Eat or Drink to their 8j"?jftS
Gods, by putting part of it on the Altar, ori#.u* J
caiting it into the Fire ; fb that to Eat of fiich u.
Meats or to Drink of. fuch Wine had been to
partake of things offered to Idols. And m
the Babyloniflj Captivity they .weie net under
fo great Difficulties in the Obfervation of the
Laws concerning Clean and Unclean Meats,
as they have lain under fince their total and-
final Difperfion, for the Favour which Goa.
gave them with the Heathens amongfr. whom
they lived, and tfte Multitudes which were,
'carried away and lived together, afforded them
the conveniency of following their own Rites
and Cufloms in eating fuch Meats only as were
not forbidden or defiled : And then they were
. reft rained from Idolatry by thefe Abftinen-
U 2 ties
|44 ^e ^S^fonahlenefs and Certainty
cies, and they became the more* remarkable in
the Eyes of the Heathens, and their wonderful
Zeal for their Religion even in the (malic ft mat-
ters was apt to make thofe among whom they
were Captives, the more earndt. to enquirl*
into the greater and more fubfrantial and ex-
cellent Things of their Law. And thefe were
Realbns which were worth their fubmkting
to great Inconveniencies, by adhering to their
legal Obfervances in other Countries. But
now thefe and all other Realbns are ceafed,
and the Cafe is altered, fince they are' a defpif-
ed People, difperled in (mall Parties over the
face of the whole Earth ; and therefore the
Abftinencies of the Jews are apt to be look'd
upon -as abfurd by thofe with whom they con-
vert, that will not be at the pains to confi-
der the Grounds upon which they were at firil
inftituted, and that they are no longer Pra-
cticable, nor defigned to be practifed, by their
Original Inflitution.
2. Circumcifion, Purifications, Abftinencies,
Sacrifices, 2nd other Rites enjoyned by the
Law- of Mofcs, were not required for their
own fake, or . for an^ real Vertue and Effi-
cacy fuppoled to be in the things themfelves,
to recommend Men to God* Favour,- but were-:
Inflkutcd to fignify the inward Purity and •
Integrity of the Heart, and by outward ob-
lervances and icnfible Things, to lead a Car-
nal and fenfual People to the Knowledge and
Practice of things Spiritual. The Children of
JffMct
of the Cbriftian Religion. * > «
7/r^/ are fometimes faid ro be Sanctified, that
is, to be feparated and fet apart for Gods Ho-
nour and Service by thefe Rites and Ceremo-
nies, both becaufe they were hereby diftin-
guifhed from other Nations, and becaufe this
Ritual Worfhip was appointed as a Means to
lead them to internal Sanctity and Holinefo
of Mind, and to procure in them an Awe
and Reverence of that Majefty, by whole
Commandment it was to be obierved.
Circumcifion was appointed as a Federal
Rite, and as a Token and Pledge of the Cove-
nant between God and AbrabaWy and his feed
after him, of which the Mefftas was to be
born. And as it was a Sacrament of the Cove-
nant between God and the People of lfrael, fo it
had Refped to the Nations whom they were to
root out; thefe Nations were notorious for
the Sins of the Flefh, Lev. xviii. 24. and
there is a peculiar fignifkancy in the Rite of
Circumcifion of the Reftraint and Excifion of
Carnal Lulls. It was declared by Mofes him*
felf to fignify the Circumcifion of the Heart,
Lev.xxv'u 41. Dentr.x. 16. xxx. 6. and like;
wife by the Prophets Jer. iv. 4. vi. 10. Ezek*
xliv. 7. They expflund Circumcifion in a My-
ftical and Spiritual Senfe ; and according to
this notion of Circumcifion St. Pa.il maintains
that the true Circumcifion is among the Chri-
ftians, whereof the Jewifi Circumcifion of the
Flefh was but a Figure, Rom* ii. 'z%\ Pki£.
iii. i*
U 3 The
$46 The (Reafonablenefs and Certainty
The Pardon of Sin upon Repentance is ex- •
preit in Scripture, by cleanfing and purify
ing, P/k/.xix. 12. li. 2. Ifai. i. 16. Jer.iv. 14.
Ezek, xxxvi. 25, 26. by which is denoted to
us that outward cleanfing of the Flefh de-
fign'd to put Men in mind of the inward Pu*
rification and Cleanfing from Sin and from Un-
righteoufnefs, becaufe this defiles the Soul,
and makes it loathlbme in God's Sight, 2 Cor.
vii. i. lam. iv. 8.
Abfiinen y from things in a Legal Account,
Common and Uncle an was appointed to rcftrain
Men by Symbolical Inffruc~tions from Sin,
(0 qM which pollutes the Mind, and the Moral (c) fig-
ego eit?nification of fuch Prohibitions is implied in
l^^'v^o" tn^ Proverb alleged by St- Peter concerning
res'f'ei-.in- Dogs and Swine, which are two of the Ani-
guuntur majs prohibited the Jews. 2 Pet.il. 22.
Volumate*. — in AninulibuN per legtm quafi q^ocldam hamaflS vttx fpe-
eulum conftitutum eft- Novation. c!e lib. Judaic c. 3.
Sacrifices and Offerings were to represent
to them, that they depended upon Go'd for al\
they had, and therefore they were to offer
fotrtething of every kind in Acknowledgment,
that they had received all which they enjoy-
ed from him. They were likewife defigned
to fignify to them that their Sins deferved
Death, even Everlajling Burnings. The daily
Sacrifices were to be Remembrances to them
of that Acceptable and Living Sacrifice, which
they
of the Chriflian Religion. 347
they were to offer to God, a broken and a con-
trite Heart, and an Innocent and Blameleft
Life, P/I iv. 4, 5. Cxli. 2. And the Scriptures
frequently teftify how little Pleafure God took
in the Sacrifices of Beafts, and in Burnt-Offer-
ings, Incenle, and Oblations, and how fmall
Regard he had to them : He never required
thcie things for therafelves and upon their own
Account, or becaufe there is any thing acce-
ptable to him in them, PfaU xl. 6, 4. 1. 8, li. 17.
To do Juftice and love Mercy is more acce-
ptable to God than all Sacrifices, Prov. xxi. 2y
Jer. vii. 22, 23. This is fo evident through-
out the whole Old Teftament, that the Scribes
and Pharisees in the moft fuperftitious and
corrupt Age of the Jcwijb Church, could not
but confels that the Love of God and of our
Neighbour, is of more Account in Gods fight
than all the Sacrifices and Oblations in the
World, Mark\'iu $7. The 'Ceremonial Part
of the Law was always to give place to the
Moral : thus Acts of Charity were to be
done, tho' it happened that they were per-
formed by the violation of the Jewijb Sabbath,
and the Prophets were, upon neceflary Caufes,
held exempted from the Legal Obfervances.
For I dejired Mercy and not Sacrifce, and the
knowledge of God more than Burnt-Offerings*
HoC vi. 6*.
5. All the Jcwijb Worlhip appointed by the
Mofaical Law was Typical of Chrift and his
Cofpcl. By a Typ we are to underftand the
U 4 Like-
^48 Tl?e <%eafonablenefs and Certainty
Likenefs and Refemblance which one thing
has to another, as that of the Impreflion. to
the Seal, or of the Shadow to the Subftance,
or of the Pi&ure to the Man whom it repre-
fents. Thus the Death of Chrift was typified
or refembled, or reprelented and prefigured by
the Death of the Beafts which were Sacrificed ;
they were figns appointed to keep up the Re-
membrance that Chrift was to be Sacrificed,
and were very apt and proper to put Men in
Mind of it. It was acknowledged by the
Jews, and received from the Beginning as a
certain Rule for the Interpretation of Scripture
that there was a Typical as well as a Literal
Senfe of it, relating to the MeJJIas and his
Kingdom. Circumcifion was to fignify to
them that Chrift was to be born of the Seed
of Abraham, to whom Circumcifion was firft
enjoyned upon the Promife made to him of
Jfaacy from whom Chrift was to defcend ;
And the Blood fhed in Circumcifion was Typi-
cal of that Blood Which Chrift was to fhed
for us.
The molt probable Account of the Origi-
ginal of Sacrifices is, that they were at firft
of Divine Institution, and were appointed
fbon after the Fall of Man as Types of the
Sacrifice of the Death of Chrift, who was
promifed to be fent to die for the Expiation
of Sin. For tho* there be a natural lleafon
why we fhouuld not Offer, unto the Lord our
Cod of that which doth Coft us nothing^MX. fhould
Honour
of the Chrijlian (Religion. 540
Honour the Lord with our Sub/lance* 2 Sam*
xxiv. 24. Prov* iii. 9. and fhould preterit
fbme part of the beft of what we have, , in
Devotion and Gratitude to him, from whom
we have received the Whole : Yet no fufE-
cient Reafon can be given why Beads fhould
be Slain in Sacrifice, before they were uied,
as far as it appears, for Food by Men, or
how it fhould be imagined that God would
accept of the Blood of any Creature, or be
pleafed with the taking from it that Life
which he had given it, or why a peculiar
Efficacy towards the Expiation of Sin was
fuppofed to be in the Blood, unlefs it had
been upon the Account of the Blood of Chriffc
which was Typically prefigured by the Blood
of Beafts. By Faith whereof Abel offered his
Sacrifice and was accepted, Eeb- xi. 4. The
Pafchal Lamb was a plain Type of Chrift,
for which Reafon Chrift is ftyled, the Lamb
of Cod and our Paffover which is Sacrificed for
jk, Jo. i. 29. 1 Cor, v. 7. And for the fame
Reafon the Feaft of the PalTover was appoint-
ed to the Jfraelites juft before their Efoape out
of jEgjrpt to be a Type to them of that De-
liverance which Chrift was to acccmplifb,
of which their Deliverance out of ALgyp was
but a Figure. Aaron was a Type of Chrift,
and all the Sacrifices he offered were Types of
Chrift's Sacrifice upon the Crols : They were
appointed to take away the Legal Unclean-
nefs, to reftore Men to a State of Legal Pu-
rity,
|5<> The Q(eafonablene/s and Certainty
rity, which was Typical of Moral and Spiri-
tual Purity, and to put the Legal Worfbipers
. into fuch a Condition as the Law required to
qualify them for the Legal Service and Worfbip ;
and herein they were Figures of that one Sa-
crifice, which was to be offered up once for
all in Attonement for the Sins of all Mankind,
Hebr. ix. 14. whereby Men might be rend red
Capable of paying God an acceptably Service
in Spirit and in Truth*
Legal Purifications were Typical of that
Purification which is by the Blood of Chrifl,
Tit. ii. 14. 1 John i. 9. And the fmoak of
the Incenfe aicending fignified how the Pray-
crs of the Saints come up before God, Rev.
v. S. viii. 3, 4. The Sta?eand Difpenfation of
the Gofpel is expreft by the Prophet Mala*
chi under the Figure of Ir/cenfe. and a Pure
Offering, Malach.'l. 1 1.
The whole Lpiftle to the licbre.vs is writ-
ten upon tins lubjecl, to (hew that all the
Legal Kites and Ceremonial Vvoifhip, Wert}
but Shadows, and Types^and Figures of Chriif,
:>nd of that Redemption, Righteoufnefs, and
Sanclirication, which was to be wrought by
him, and that therefore they were to ceale
when in him they had received their Ac-
compli Pnment. Their Incenfe and Furificati-
tions, their Sacrifices, their Temple, and the
Priefts themfelves were all but fo mam/Types of
thrift and his Kingdom under the Gofpel.
Chrift had been promifed to our firft Parents
imw«.
of the Chrijiian Religion. 3 51
immediately after their Fall,and this Promife had
been renewed to Abraham, with an AfTurance
that he fhould defcend from Ifaac, and Cir-
cumcifion was initituted as a perpetual mark
in the Flefh of that Covenant ; and all Sacri-
fices from the beginning of their Inftitution
were as fb many Types and Memorials of
the Sacrifice of Chrift, which wae promi-
fed before any Saciifice had been offered : And
more cfpecially that of the PafTover at tha
deliverance of the Ifraelites out of Mgypt was
a lively Representation of our Redemption
by the Death of Chiift, They had ever this,
Notion of their legal Worfhip : Abraham to
whom Circumcifion was appointed, faw the
day of Chrift ; he fore-faw his Defcent from
himlelf, which was thereby prefigured and
was glad, Joh. viii. 56. And Mofes by whom
the Ceremonial Service was ordained, had fo
clear a Profpicl of the Mejfias and his King-
dom that he eJJeemcd the Reproach of Chrift
greater Riches than the Treasures of Mgypi
Hebr* xi. 26. Thofe places of Scripture
which the Apoftles apply to Chrift out of
the Old Teftament, were at that time by
the Jews themfelves, to whom they Cite them,
underftood of the Mejjias ; they always fup-
poled that whatever was great and Excellent
among them, was but a faint and imperfect
Refemblance of that Glory and Excellency
which was to be in its full Perfection and
Accomplifhment under the Mefftts.
4: Du-
3 $2 The ${eafonahlenefs and Certainty
4. During this Ceremonial Difpenlation,
there was a fufficient Revelation of $he inter-
nal and fpiritual Part of Religion : In the
Books of Mofesy the Love of God with all the
Heart, and the Love of their Neighbour as
of Themfelves, is exprefly commanded the
Children of Ifrael- Lev* xix. 18. Dent* vi. 5.
Tne 1-iigKPrieft's Office was to blefs the Peo-
ple. Numb* vi. 2}. and die Office of the Priefts
and Levites, befides the Ceremonial Service,
was to fiand every Morning to thank and
praife the Lord, and likewife at Even, I Chron*
(x) rid. xxiii. 30. 2 Chron. xxxi. 2. and (x) no Sacrifice
QKtule was ever offered without Prayers. The im-
lib.'i.c. mortality of the Soul is implied in that Ex-
i^s. 9. preilion, which is often ufed in the Books of
Mofes, that Men when they died were ga~
there d to their People : which muft be under-
ftcod of their Souls ; their Bodies being bu-
ried at different places and in divers Countries,
not where their Anceftors had been buried.
And tho4 this and iiich like Phrafes may fbme-
times fignify no more, than their leaving the
World, as- others had done before them fas
mod Words and ExpreiTions are often u(ed%
improperly ) and may in fome places be ap-
plied to ill Men ; yet there could never have
been any Reafbn or Foundation for fuch a
Phrafe, but from a Suppofition of the Souls
Immortality. Balaam wifh'd to die the Death
of the Right eowy and that his laji End might1
be like that of the Righteous. Numb, xxiii. 10.
For
of the Chriftian Religion. 353
For what Reafon, but that he might not be
miferable, but happy after Death?
A fiuure State was always believ^ by the*
Jews, as revealed touhem in the Old Tefta-
ment, and whatever Texts there may 'be,
which feem to imply the contrary, they are
'either fpoken only by way of Objection, as in
the Book of Eccle/iajfes, or el(e they have no
Relation to the State after this Life, either to
affirm or deny it ; but are to be underftood to
proceed from that Defire, which pious Men
had to honour and glorify God in their feveral
Generations, by reftoring his Worfbip, where
it had been negle&ed, or in propagating his
Religion, where it had not been yet known.
Thus that good King Uezekiah, fays to God in
his Thankfgiving ; The Grave cannot praife
thee, Death cannot celebrate thee i they that go
down into the Pit, cannot hope for thy Truth*
The Living the living, he /ball praife thee,
as I do this day : The Father to the Children
/bail make known thy Truth. Ifa. xxxviii. 18,
19. This is fpoken with the fame Zeal and
Spirit, by which he Was acted in his Reforma-
tion. And when David faid, In Death there
is no Remembrance of thee, in the Grave y who
flail give thee Thanks ? PfaL vi. 5. He cannot
be fuppofed to have any Doubtfulnefs con-
cerning a future State; for in other Pfalms,
lie plainly atTerts it, Pfal. xvi 11. xvii. 15.
But his Meaning is expkind PfaL xxx. 0.
where lie fays; What profit U there in my Blood,
when
354 ^e ^AJma^ene(s an<l Certainty
when 1 go down into the Pit ? Shall the Dvfi
fraifethce? Shall it declare thy Truth? In
our other Tranflation it is, Shall the Duft give
Thanks to thee ? To give Thanks then to God,
is in grateful Acknowledgment for his Mer-
cies ; to praile and magnify his Name, and
manifeft his Truth among Men, which is not
to be done in the Grave, God's Difpen'ations
to the People of Ifrael, being with this Defign :
Pious Men defir'd that their Lives might be
prolong'd for this purpofe, that they might
declare his Truth, and Vindicate and pro-
mote his Honour in this World, before they
were call'd to the next, where there can be no
Opportunity for this Service to God and Bene-
fit to Mankind.
Enoch was taken up alive into Heaven, to
be an Example of that Happinefs which God
has prepar'd for thofe who walk with him,
and pleafeth him. Gen- v. 24. And our Sa-
viour Mark xii- 26. proves the Refurre&ion
of the Dead from Exod. iii. 6. Thofe for
whom God has that peculiar Favour, as to
ftile Himfelf their God, and to declare this to
be His Name or Title for ever, and this to be
His Memorial unto all Generations* Verf 1 5.
we may be allured are not fo dead, as utterly to
have perifh'd : and if their Souls have fur-
viv'd their Bodies, their Bodies likevvile muft
be railed again; forafmuch as the Soul of A- .
hraham without his Body is not Abraham, but
?nly one part of him :' and his Soul could not
of theChnjltan Religion. 35$
be ftil'd Abraham, but with refped not only
to its paft, but to its future Union with his
Body: For tho' a part be often put for the
whole, yet it always fuppofes either the pre-
fent or future Exigence of the Whole ; but
is never put for t e whole, when it remains
alone, and the reft is utterly and finally ex-
tinct. Abraham confifts of Soul and Body,
and therefore God being the God of Abraham,
is God both of the Soul and Body of Abra-
ham ; which is an Argument that the Soul of
Abraham now lives, and that his Body fhall
live again ; for All live to God. And he would
not have given himfelf a folemn Title and
Denomination from a Man who had no long*
er any Being ; nor from that Part of him,
which had utterly perifh'd. I am the God of
thy Father, the God of Abraham, the God of
I/aac, and the God of Jacob* 'Abraham had his
Name in Token that he fhould be a Father
of many Nations- Gen. xvii. 5. and Ifaac and
Jacob were Heirs of the fame Promife ; and
therefore the God of Abraham is the God of
that Father of Nations, and has a particular
Regard to the Bodies ("from which thofe Na«
tions were defcendedj as well as to the Souls
of Abraham and his Pofterity. 1 am the God
of Abraham, not 1 nuts, but / am, which fup-
pofes Abraham yet to be. I ain the fame God
ftill to him, that I was during his Life upon
earth ; he is ftill the Object of the Divine
Care and Goodnefs, and therefore fhall be re-
warded
3 56 TJje ^eafonabknefs and Certainty
warded both in Body and Soul. God is not
afbamed to be catfd their God : for he hath pre-
pared for them a City* Heb. xi. 16. that is, an
Habitation in Heaven.
The Children of Ifrael before the giving of
the Law were inftrucled in the Rewards and
Punifhments of the Life to come; and Tem-
poral Rewards and Punifhments were ap-
pointed by Mofcs, as Pledges and Types to
reprefent and prefigure to them thofe of- a
Future §tate. For that Abraham and the Pa-
triarchs before him, had a true and full No-
tion of a Life after this, we are certain from
Heb.YA. 10, i}. And we have as great Cer-
tainty, that Abraham did inftruct his Children
and his Houfjold after him. Gen. xviii. 19.
and Mofes wrote of Chrift. jfo. v. 46. Gen. \\u
15. xii. 3. xlk. 1.0. Deut. xviii. 15, 18.
Thefe things were delivered in the Books
of Mofesy and well underftood by the Gene-
rality of the Jews in all Ages, the Sadducees
were fingular in denying the Redirection of
the Dead, and fome other Doctrines, in which
all the reli were agreed. But if there were any '
Obfcurity or Difficulty in the Books of Mo-
fes, they had befides the Priefts a conftant
Succeffion of Prophets lor many Ages to Inter-
pret them, and to maintain and inculcate
thofe Fundamental Doctrines of Religior*
The Rewards of Heaven are declared, PfaL xvi.
11. xvii. 15. Prov. xv. 24. Ecclef. xii. 14.
Dan. xii. 2? j< The Torments of Hell are aft
fertedj?
of the Chriftian (Religion. 3 1 5
ferted, PfaL xvi. 10. E'cclef. xi. 9. xii. 14. Ifah
xxxiii. 14. Dan. xii. 2. 'The Refurre£Hon of
the Dead, P/W. xvii. 15. //*/. xxvi, 19. Ezek.
xxxvii. 1. Dan. xii- 2. ffo/! xiii. 14. And in
the Book of 7^» which is of the greatxft
Antiquity, 7^xiv.i2. xix. 26. 27. In that
Expreffion that David and others Slept with
their Fathers, is implyed not only the Im-
ortality of the Soul, but the Refurre&ion
of the Body. For it implies that there
was not a total end of them, but as they
Slept fo muft they awake and rife again,
PfaL xvii. 1 5. And this Expreffion is taken
from the Old Teftament, and applied to the
fame Senfe in the New. Our Saviour fpeak-
ing of Regeneration, fays to Nicodemus, art
thou a Mafier in Jfrael and knoweft not thefe
things? Job* hi. 10. and he bids the T rvs
fearch the Scriptures of the Old Teftament 5
for in them fays he, ye think ye have Eternal
Life, and they are they which teliify of me9
Job v. j 9. it was in them fore-toid that a
much clearer Revelation was to be made by the
Goiptijer. xxxi. 31. When our Saviour by
his Reiurrection gave a fuller Manifeftation
of a future Immortal State thsn could be gi-
• ven by any other Means, and brought Life and
Immortality to Light thro' the G(Jpel, 2 Tim. i.
10. Yet this it felf was Typifyed in the Old
Teftament, by railing Dead Men to Life a-
gam ; and the Tranflation of Enoch and Eli-
jah into Heaven was for a Testimony and Af-
X fu ranee
%%6 The Qteafonablenefs and Certainty
furance of a Future State both of Body and
Soul.
The Do&rin deliverd by Mojes and the Pro-
phets was as effe&ual a Caution and warning to
Men, to keep them from the place of Torments
as a MefTag'e from the Dead could have been,
Luke xvi. 3 1. The Old Teftament therefore
is not deficient in *any neceffary Point of Sal-
vation, but the Ceremonial Law was enjoyn-
ed, as a fuitable Help and Expedient for the
retaining thofe Truths which had been re-
vealed before. Winch was fo well known,
t*) origin. (%) tnat Cgifa pUts this as an Objection into
c'eifJib.Zythz Mouth of the Jews, whom he brings in
Arguing againft the Chriftian Religion, that
it taught them nothing but what they knew
before, concerning the Refurrection of the
Dead, and a future Judgment and a State of
Rewards and Pumfhrnents in another World.
And it cannot be denied that the Apocryphd
as well as the Canonical Books teach thefe
things.
The Honour and Authority of our Religion
amongft Men depends very much upon a
right Knowledge and a due consideration of
this Subject. And thole who profefs never
fo great Veneration for the New Teftament,
but have little elieem for any part of the Old,
underftand neither the one nor the other as
they ought. They refer all along to each o-
ther, and muft Hand or fall together, for the
one is but a Draught as it were, or Model
of
of the Chrijilan Religion.
of the other ; all things being though ob-
fcurely, yet fufficiently taught in the Old Te-
ftamenr, which are fully and .lively expreft
in the New.
The Sum of all is this. The Faith in the
Mefjias to come, and the Principles of Reli-
gion and Morality had been delivered down
from the Beginning by Adam and Noah to
their Pofterity: And when Mofes by God s
Direction and Appointment gave Laws to the
Children of Ifrael; the End and Defign of
thefeLaws was the prefervation of thisFaith and
Practice amongft them And this was effected
by vifible Objects and fenfible Remembrances ;
the Jewifi Difpenfation was ordain'd incon-
defcenfion to the Circumftances and Capaci-
ties of thofe Ages and that Nation, in fucha
manner as was moft fuitable to their Condi^-
tion, and moft Worthy of God ; the reft: of
the World had wholly giveri up and aban-
doned themfelves to Carnal Ordinances and
Superftitions ; and God, who produceth Good
out of Evil, made ufe of this Fondnefs and
Dotage of Mankind to the Prefervation and
Advancement of Truth and Holinefs amongft
Men. The Ceremonial Worfhip was no far-
ther acceptable to God, and no otherwifede-
fign'dbyHim, than to keep his People from
running into Idolatry, to which they had fb
great a Pronenefs? to put them in mind of
their own Sinfulnefs and Unworthinefs, to
prelerve a Senfe of Moral Duties, and of an
X 2 inward
W
:Ji8 Tlx ^eafonallenefs and Certainty
inward and fpiritual Service; and to re-
tain a Remembrance and Expectation of that
Sacrifice, Oblation and Satisfaction^ which had
been foretold, and was //.- the Fulnef of time
to be offered upon the Cro'is for tiie Sins of
the World.
Thanks be to God, that we are inftrucled
to worfhip him in Spirit and in Truth, with-
out fo many burthenibme Ceremonies ; but in
thole Ages of the World, nothing would have
feem'd more ftrange and abfurd than a Religir
On without fome Pomp and Solemnity of Ce^
remonies: And God appointed for his Peo-
ple thole which were innocent, to reftrain
them from all that were wicked and hurtful ;
He apppointed the Sacrifices of Beafts to be
Types of Chrift's Sacrifice, and to with-
hold them from Humane Sacrifices*, which
were prafbifed in other. Nations, and en-
joyn'd by other Religions; he commanded
them to abftain from certain Meats, that they
might not eat of Things offer'd to Idols,, and
thele innocent Ceremonies he made ufeful
and ferviceable to the Great Ends of Faith
and Righteoufnefs. Nothing impracticable
can be fuppoled to be prefcrib'd by God
to any People; nothing which is above their
Abilities and prefent Attainments; and there-
fore would be of no ufe and benefit to them.
But rather the Divine Goodnels would con-
defcend to their Infirmities, and comply with
them in giving them fuch Laws, as may be
agree?
of the Cbriftian Religion. j$$j>
agreeable and convenient for them in their
prefent State, and may fit them for an higher
and more excellent Difpenfation. Whatibever
we may think of it now, nothing at the time,
when the Law wasgiven* would havelook'd
like Religion, that had been without abun-
dance of Rites arid Ceremonies. And herein
the Wifdorh of God appears, that to fuch a
People and in fuch an Age, he gave a Law fb
admirably proper, and well contriv'd to pre-
ferve the Life and Subftance of Religion under
the Veil of. Ceremonies, and to prepare them
for the coming of his Son, when it was to be
of no longer continuance. The Law was given
by Mofesy but Grace and Truth came by Jefta
Chrift. Joh. i. 17. that is, the Grace of the-
Gofpel, and the Truth and Reality or Sub*
ftance of thofe Things, which were prefigur-
ed by the Law-
CHAR XVI.
Of the Cejfation of the Jewifti
Law.
OUR SAVJOUR was the GREAT
PROP HETy who was to come, as
Mofes had foretold, and who was.expe&ed at
ihe time of Hk coming ; and it was likewife,
X jj txpe&ecV
^ o The (Reafonablenefs and Certainty
expected, that that Prophet fhould work Mi-
racles, as Mofcs had done, whom he was to
be like, and he was to be a Lawgiver as
Mofes had been. The Jews had a general
Expectation that the Meffiah would manifeft
Himfelf by .Miracles. Job. vii- $i. Miracles
had not been for a lcr.~ time wrought in the
Jewijh Church, but it was received as a known
and undoubted Truth, that they were to be re-
00 Mil- v*v A ^y ^*m' The (x) Rabbins fKU teach that
mm. \?ore theGift of Prophecy is to return at the coming of
Hwocb. t|le Mejfiajj^ according to God's exprefs Promife :
35, ' c' And the Samaritans themlelves had this No-
tion of the Meffiah, that he was to give full
Inftru&ions in all things relating to the Wor-
fhip of God. Job. iv. 2 5. And the Prophecies
concerning the Birth, and Life, and Death of
Chrift, in all things necefTary to prove him
the true Meffiah, were litterally fulfilled in
our Saviour, and thofe things which concern
the Nature of His Kingdom, have been ex-
plain'd by Him and his Apoftles. So that it
being fully prov'd, that Jefus is the Chrift by
the Accomplishment in Him of the Antient
Prophecies concerning the Meffiah, we ought
to reft fatisfied in his Authority, both for the
CefTation of the Law of Mofes, and for any
Explication which He and his Apoftles have
given us of it. But this vis not all,' we are
able to prove againft the Jews from the Books
of the Old Teftament, that their Laws was
to ceafe, when the Meffiah was come.
The
of the Chrijtian %eligion. ¥ j i"
The Gofpel is fo far frum containing any-
thing contrary to the Law,that it is the Fulfill-
ing and Acccmplifhment of it. The Moral
Precepts are improv'd and advanced, and the
Ceremonial and Ritual Part was not properly
abrogated and abolifh d, but it continued for
as long time as it was defign'd to do, and then
expir'd of it ft If ; it ftrv'd thefe Ends for
which it was instituted, and afterwards muft
of confequence ceafe. The Ceremonial Wor-
fhip therefore was permitted to the Jews,
who became Convertstfo the Chriftian Faith,
till the Deftruc~tion of their City and Temple,
and then it was no longer practicable, but
muft of necefiity ceafe ; and the Ceflation of
the Law of hhfesy when once it had its Pe-
riod and Accomplifhment, was as much the
Will of the Legiflator, at its firft lnftitution^
as its former Obligation could be.
The Jewifij Law bung Figurative and Ty-
pical, it follows, that it was to ceafe of courfe,
when the Things prefigur'd and typified by it,
fhould be brought to pafs, that is, when the
Mejfuh fhould come. For then the Types and
Figures being fulfilled, could be of no longer.
ufe, nor the Law which cnjoyn'd them, of
any longer continuance, when once this Prin-
cipal Reafon of it cealed, and all ether ends
defign'd by it, might be better attain'd with-
out it, by the Worfhip of God in Spirit and in
Truth. And this Law was fo contriv'd, as
not only to expire upon the fulfilling of it
^4 by
-» * z The $(eafonablenefs and Certainty
by the Mej]iaby but to become impracticable
and impollible to be obferv'd afterwards. 1
Jhall therefore prove the CefTation of the lew
iftj Law. I. Becaufe the Meffiab is come, in
whom it wTas fulfilled. II. Becaufe it was
foretold by the Prophets, that the Law fhould
ceale upon the coming of the. Meffidb. III.
Becaufe after the coming of the Meffiah, it
was to become impracticable -and impoffible
to be obferv'd.
i. The Mcfliab is come, in whom the Law
is fulfilled. As the comtaig o"f the Meffiah was
p refi^ur'd in the various Types and Ceremo-
nies of the Law, which were therefore to re-
ceive their Accomplishment in him, fo it is
manifeft that our Saviour is the Meiliah, fince
the Prophecies concerning the Median have
been all fulfill'd in Him. This has been al-
ready prov'd at large; and the Prophecies of
) Mun. Zjchariab and bhLcby, are fo very plainly and
■ k undeniably fulfilled, that Q) fbme of the Jews9
to evade them, have been forced to fay, that
the Meflkh was born before the Befti uefion
of the fecond Temple, tho' he doth not yet
appear, but that he was Teen at Rome, and
has ever fince lain conceal'd, as Alcfes did in
the Houfe of Pharaoh ; and that the time will
come, when he fhall require the Difmiflion of
the 'jews from the Pope, as Mofes demanded of
Pharaob the Difmiflion of the Children of lf-
raei But they fay, that he defers the Mani-
Marion of himfelf by reafon of their Sins ;
and
of the Chtftfon {Religion. }}$
and upon this account have made many fb-
lemn Humiliations to implore his Help and
haften his corning ; particularly A- D- MDII.
they appointed a Publick Humiliation for ■
Young and Old, Men, Women, and Children
in ail Parts of- the World, for nigh a whole (h)yu/f
Year together. (b) Trypho did not deny that Martyr.'
Chrift was born, and might be fomewhere DMog.
unknown, but faid, that he could not know
himfelf to be Chrift, nor work Miracles, till
Elias ^ad anointed him, and manifefted him (x)^*»»
to the World. (x) Others have faid, that^r-^
there is to be a Third Temple, and during
the time of the laft, the Median will come,
only becaufe Abraham call'd the Place where
the Temple ftood, a Mountain, lfaac a Field,
and Jacob an Houle. Some are of Opinion,
that their Sins hinder his coming ; fome again
think, that they are neither finful enough, nor
righteous enough: For, fay they, he mult
come in a Generation altogether finful, or al-
together righteous.
The Prophecy of Darnel's Weeks is fo pun-
dually in all its Circumftances fulfilled, that(OJofcph.
not only (f) Jofepbtts and the modern J^s^!lJ^H' *
apply it to the Deftru&ion of Jerufalem by x- c! i£
Titus, but (!) fome of the Jews when they seeundud
could not deny the Computation to be true, ^"Q^id
and to agree exactly with the time of our Sa- Umbonb.
viours Birth, have even dared to fay that Da- yQ}{ Llf
mel himfelf was miftaken in the Account, o-Fidjik.'^
then have confeft that all the Terms of Time
aflxgned
3J4 *"e %?d)Qnablene}s and Certainty
afiigned lor the coming of the McJJigh are
pti if, and that now thtir only hopes of deli-
verance and redemption are to be placed in
their Repentance,; and o:hers lay a Curie up-
on fuch as prelume to fix any particular Time
(g)G<».for the coming of the Mejjlab. But (s) Rab-
fibFrU/ hi Nehumias who lived fifty "years before
14' rd LChrift, declared that the coming of the Mef-
ter sarrav. fufj according to Daniels Prophecy could not
E^' be deferred beyond the fpace of fifty years
longer, as Grotius has obferved from the Tat-
t&n$>opirtud. Divers (c) of the Jews place the Paffion
Pearfonca of Chrift fixty nine years before our common
%An%[ Account of the Year in which he truly fuffer-
ed, others pretend another different Account
without the leaff. Reafon for either pretence,
but this fliews how defperate a Caufe they
are engaged in, which forceth them upon
fuch Artifices ; for we have the exprefs Te-
flimony of Tacitus, that he differed under
Vomim dilate. They Interpret Jfa't. vii. 14.
where it is Prophefied that the Mifftah was
to be Born of a Virgin, contrary to the
Senfe of their Fere-Fathers, and therefore re-
ject the AntientTranftation of that Verfe by
• (d)?«Mhe Sept it agin t, as (d) J/t/linM&nyr urged a-
Aivt. Da- ga jnft t|ie yews 0f his time. In Origins time
they expounded Ifai, liii. of the Nation of the
Jews, not of any particular Perfon, though
(e)origen ^ (*) Origen Argued in a Difputation with
lib"'. them, the Tenor of the whole Chapter is a
plain confutation of this way of expounding
ify
of the Cbrijaan Religion. ^5
it, and efpecially thefe words of the 8th Verfe,
for the Tranfgreffion of my People was he ftrick'
en. By the Perfbn ftricken cannot be under-
ftood the People, for whofe Tranfgreffion he
is faid to have been ftricken. (h) But they .(h).GroU
have found out another Evafion by pretending ls[ hxb' #„
that there are to be two Mefliahs, one the Son /&«•/» Pear-
of Jofepb, who is. to be a fuffering Meffiah^ib*
and the other the Son of David,, who is to
enjoy all manner of Temporal Profperity and
Power.
So plain is it, that the Prophecies which
the Jews themfelves of old understood of Chrift
are fulfilled " in our Saviour, and fo unavoidably
do they contradict all their own Antient In-
terpretations of Scripture, when they will
not allow them to be fulfilled in him, For
that they are fulfilled it is evident, and they
can affign no other Perfbn in whom they
have been fulfilled.
II. It was fore-told by the Prophets, that
the Law fhould ceafe upon the coming of the
MeffiaL It is evident from the Prophets that
in fome years after Chrift, Jerufalem was to be
no longer the feat of the Jewijh Power and
Government, nor the place of Worfhip. And
their Prophecies fuppofe the Ceffation of the
Jem(h Law upon a Two-fold Account, 1 . From
tjie Deft ruction of the Temple. 2. From the
Difperfion of the People of the Jews and the
Deftru&ion of their City.
1. From the Deftru&ion of the Temple. '
The
%l& The %eafonablenefs and Certainty
The Prophet Daniel fore- told that after the
fccffiah was cut off the Sanfiuary fhould be de-
frayed, and the Sacrifice and the Oblation fhould
Ceafe, aod that there fhould be Defblation e-
ven until the Conft/n/n/ation, Dan- ix. 26, 27.
Since the San&uary i9 laid wafte and defolate,
and by this Prophecy is never to be Rebuilt,
the Temple being the Place of all their Woc-
fhip and Solemnities, that failing their whole
Worfhip muft Fail with it. And whenever
the 7eirs 'have attempted to Rebuild their
Temple, they have been hundred from doing
it, and particularly (as I have feveral times
already o'ofei veef) in the time of Jtlian the
Apoftate, by Miraculous and dreadful Judg-
mcnts,related by Amm'unus Marccllinus an Hea-
then Hjftprian, w' o lived at that time, and
Mi"a*w ^ a '& JetVfflJ Writer, And When they have
adexcerpubcen permitted to I3uild them Synagogues and
Genur*. Places of Worflip in all o:her Parrs of the
'££**' World, that Place alone has been denied them
in which by their Law they were indifpen-
fably bound t > WorQiip. A«] the Males were
obliged to refort to Jer;ifale/» to Worfhip
thrice every year, an i the Place of their Wor--
fhipwas more ftriclly enjoyned t'lan the time.
For if any Man were upon a Journey, or Un-
clean, a fecond Paffover was appointed for
him, but it could be obferved at no othei»
Place but JcrnfaleM, upon any cccafion what-
soever, AW. ix. 10. Vcutr.Mu 5. And there-
tore during the Captivity attf^/^they did not
Gels'-
of the Chrijlian Religion. }¥
Celebrate thefe Feafts of the Pajfover of Pen-?
tecoft, and of Tabernacles ; how could they
Sing the Lords Song in a grange Land? PfaU
Cxxxvii 4. And the Deftrudrion of the City
and Temple by the Romans at the time of
the Paffover, was a fign that they were no
longer Gods Peculiar People, nor under the
Protection of tliofe Promifes, which by the
Law were made to them, and had ever been
fulfilled till the time of the Promife. was expi-(iK#tff*
red. St. OChryfoftom blades the Jews offijffi
his time for obfcrving the Law in the Couri- r m. 6. ^
tries whither tfiey were difperft, which \\c Sav- EdtU
proves to be contrary to God's (Command-
ment, and to the Pra&ice of their Anccftors :
And the Modern Je.vs confefs tht r eir Wor-
ship is impra&ic^bie in their prelen Condition,
they acknowledge that they ought to offer
Sacrifice no where elfe but at the Temple of
Jerujalem ; the Obfervation of the Paflover a-
mong therr now is without Sacrificing the Paf<
dial Lamb, and they obferve t e day of At-
tonetnent without the Sacrifice of Expiation-
2. The DcHruclion of the Cirv of Jtrti-
falem, and the final Difperfion of the People
of the whole Ration of jhe Jews proves, that;
their Law is at an end. Jacob plainly foretold
both the coming of the MejUah, and the end '
of the Power and Authority of the Nation of
die Jews. upon His coming- The Sceptre JhaA
not depart from Judeh, nor a Lawgiver from
between His feet until- Shiiob come, and unco
: Him
33$ The fyafonabkne/s and Certainty
Him {ball the gathering of the People be* Gen.
xlix. 10. This Prophecy was by the antient
Jews always underftood of the Meffiab, as is
evident by the Targums ; and it appears to be
fulfill'd in our Saviour, both becaufe the Jew-
ijh Government in His time was drawing to-
wards its final Period, and becaufe the People
of all Nations have been gathered to Him,
and have been made Profelytes to his Reli-
gion. The Sceptre and the Lawgiver, that is,
the Power of their Arms, and the Authority
of their Laws was not fo to depart, as to be-
come extincl:, till the Meffiah came, which im-
plies that fbon after his coming, they were
both to ceafe, as we fee they have long fince
aclually done. The Accomplifhment of Ja-
cob's Prophecy was gradual; Herod was of
another Nation, but a Profelyte, and upon
culEi!r'^m account he might be ftil'd a Jew; as(x)
Num. 5. If. Cafanbo-a has prov'd againfi: Baronius : And
when he was made King of the Jews, this
was as a Warning to awaken them to expeel
the full Accomplifhment of this Prophecy,
which was brought to pafs in the final De-
ftru&ion of their Government. The Jewifi
Government all along under all Changes was
ftill denominated from Jiidah, tho' that Tribe
was not always in Chief Power ; and even
under Herod y who was an ldumean,\t had its
Title from Judab ; as the Roman Empire re-
tain'd its oid Denomination, when divers of
the Emperours were not Romans by Birth.
But
of the Chriftian Religion. 539
But when the Mejjiah was come> the Sceptre was
to depart from Jndah, and there were no more
to be any Law in force amongft that People,
who had been fo long known under that De-
nomination, which they receiv'd from him.
And this Prophecy of Jacob, in which he fore-
tels the Condition of the feveral Tiibes, has a
plain Reference to the Piomifed Land, and is
to be underftood of the Jewijh Government in
the Land of Canaan, for he there delcribes
the Borders of it. From the time that they
were in Poffeilion of that Land, the People of
the Jews never had loft all their Right and
Title to it, before the ccmirg of Ch; ift, but
{till retain'd their Right, during their Abode
in Babylon, and were aiTur'd that they fhould
again be put in Polli-mon after a Captivity
ofleventy Years; and in Token of this, Je-
remiah purchafed a Field of Hanamecl, his Un-
de's Son, and fubferibed and fealed the Wri -
ings, and took Wjtneffes and paid down the
Money publickly before all the Jews that fat
in the Court of the Prifon, and the Evidences
were to be kept in an Earthen Veffel. For
thus faith the Lord of H~jls the God of Ifraef,
Houfcs, and Fields, and Vineyards fljall be pof-
feft again in this Land. Jer. xxxii. 14. But
when the time of Jacob's Prophecy wasex-
pir'd, and Shiloh was come, they were driven
out, never to be reftor'd again. The Romans^
the moft Generous of any People, .dealt (b
hardly with no other Nation, as with the
I Jewsy
34o The %eafonab/ene[s and Certainty
Jews, who yet had to do with one' of the
moft merciful Princes, that ftaruls upon Re-
cord in Hiftory. If Tiberius^ or Qaliguld) or
Nero hid deftroyed them, it might I r, it. been
afcrib'd to the Cruelty of their Temper ; but
when Titus, who endeavour'd to Give them,
was by their own Obftinacy fore'd upon their
Deftru&ion, after they had by their Diffenti-
ons made themfelves a Prey to him, there was
the vifible Hand of God in it ; as Jofephus
often confeffes, and as Titus himfelf declar'd,
when he beheld the Towers and Fortifications,
after the City was taken. If they could have
agreed either in their own Defence, or in any
Terms of Submiflion to him, they would have
been far from fuffering in that Extremity.
When Pompey and Craffus entred Jerufalen/,
the time of its DeftruSion was not yet come,
hut it was referv'd to Titus, whole peculiar
Character it was, that heoblig'd all Men, and
who was fhTd the Love and Delight of Man-
kind, unwillingly to do that, which neither
Pompey nor Craffus would do. It is well urg'd
rib semn- ty a (k) Learned Jew, tho' he makes a wrong
Hum fcri* Inference from ir. Did the fame thing, fays
pum. $u* jie? befall any other People? Did the Romans
timbrocb. drive the Germans, the Britains, the Gads,
the Spaniards f the Greeks, or the Afutick Na-
tions into Captivity, and difperfe them thro-
cut all Parts of the World ? They rather en-
deavoured to preferve them, that their feveral
Countries might not want Inhabitants.
And
of the Chrijlian Religion.
And tho' the Jews have been generally ob-
ferv'd to have great Riches in the Nations
where they live, they have never been able by
any power or intereft to get themfelves ,Re-
eftablifh'd in their Country and Government,
but have been difappointed as often as they
have attempted it, tho' with never fo much
probability of fucceis. So evident it is by the
experience of fo many Ages, that however it
fares with particular perions of that Nation,
yet they never are to be united again, as a
Community, or Body of People to live under
their ancient Laws, according to the Mofaical
Conftitution. They have no City, no Go-
vernment, nor ever are to have any; and
therefore thofe Laws can now no longer be in
force, which fuppofe the continuance of their
Government. Their Genealogies are loft, up-
on which the diftinction of their Tribes and
Families, and the Succeflion of their Priefthood
did depend : So that they are without an Al-
tar, without a Prieft, without a Sacrifice, and
without any poifibility of knowing theDefcent
and Lineage of their Mejfiah, whom they ex-
pect to come ; and by coniequence cannot know
him, if he mould come, having no way to di-
ftinguifh that Tribe and Family oi which the
Prophecies declare the Mejfiah was to be. In
the Babylonian Captivity there were Aty/uxXoo*
rdeKat, who kept up Order and Government
amongft them ; and that befides was at the
moft but a fufpenfidn of their Power, it was
Y no
321
g 2 2 The Keafottabknefs and Certainty
no utter extirpation' of all Rule and Authority ;
their Genealogies were preferved, and the di-
ftinction of their Tribes and Families known ;
their deliverance out of that Captivity, with
the time and manner of it, and the very Name
of their Deliverer was foretold ; Ija xliv. 28.
Jer. xxv. 12. Dan. ix. 2. And in that Capti-
vity they had Prophets to direct and fupport
them under their affliction, and give them aP
furance of a Reftoration, but now they do not
fo much as pretend to have any. The Delive-
rance of the Ifraelites out of the ^Egyptian
Bondage was like wife foretold, with the pun-
ctual time of it, Gen. xv. 13,14.' And in ge-
neral, God declares that when at.any time tor
their Sins thev were led into Captivity, and
difperied among the Heathens, tho' they were
driven unto the utmoft part of Heaven, yet
upon their Repentance he would turn their Cap-
tivity \ and have companion upon them, and would
return and gather them from all the Nations,
whither he had fcattered them, Deut. xxx. 2,3.
Neh. i. S, 9. And this Promife muit have been
in force, as long as their Law and Conilitution
laded, and could have no limitation but the
final and determined period of it. The time
for the duration of the Jewifh Law and Go-
vernment being expired, all promifes made to
them as a difrincl: People and Nation, mull: be
expired with it ; whereas if their Law were
flill in force, the promife of their being refto-
red to their Land and Government w ould un-
doubtedly
of the Chrifliati Kehgion. 323
doubtedly before this time have been fulfilled to
them! For, befides that their Sins at their
return from their Captivity in Babylon were
very great, it cannot be fuppofed, that for {o
many Ages their Sins fhouki hinder that a Rem-
nant at leaft fhould not be reftored, if the Jea-
ifh Oeconomy had not received its final period
in the deftru&ion of their City and Nation.
( / ) Redde Jlatum Judazaz, quern Chriftus irrve CO ^2J*"
Kiaty. & alium contende venhr, This, which d*ostc.i$i
was a good Argument in Tertuliians time, is
improved ftill in every Age fince. For if the
State of the Jewifh Nation was not iuch then
as their Mejftab was to find at his coming, there
is the lefs caufe for them after fo long time to
hope that they fhall ever be reftored to fuch a
Condition, as to have any reaibn to expect
him.
III. After the coming of the Mefiah thzjew.
ifh Law was to become impracticable, and im-
poflible to be obferv'd. For if the City and
Temple were not deftroy'd, the confinement >
of the Jewifh Worfhip to one certain Place muft
neceflarily imply an alteration in their Wor-
fhip upon the coming of the Meffiahy and the
calling of the Gentiles; who could not all be
fu ppoied to affemble thrice every year at Jerit-
falem; and therefore the Prophets foretold.
That Jerufalem fhould then be no longer the
only place of God's Worfhip, but that Men
fhould Worfhip him in any place of the World.
JTis true, the Prophets often mention the re-
Y % fore
324 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
fort which fhould be' made from all Nations to
. Jerufalem, and to the Temple, or the Mountain
of the Lord. But then thefe are Myilical Ex-
preflions ; for the City of Jerufalem, atid the
Temple, are ufed by the Prophets as Types of
the Chriftian Church; and therefore Ezekiel
S'lvJ-C™) defcribes the Temple larger than the
fpeftoftbe whole City of Jerufalem,- and the City in
T*m'Pfe? greater dimenfions than all. the -Land of Or-
naan, to mew that we are not to underftand
thefe Expreflions literally. A Prieflhood after
the Order of Mislchizedeck, different from that
of Aaron was Prophefied of, Pfal. ex. 4. and a
New Covenant different from that which "was
. made with the Children oUfrael upon their co-
ming out of the Land of sEgypt, Jer. xxxi.
31, 32. And this Covenant was to extend to
the Gentiles, as well as to the Jews. For from
the rifing of the Sun, even unto the going down of
■ the fame,- my Name jhall be great among 'the
Gentiles : and in every place L.cenfe fhall be of-
fered unto my Name, and a pure offering : for
my Name fhall be great among the He at hen y faith
the Lord of If oft s, Malach. i. 11.
If again ft all this it Lc alledged, That the
Mofaical Law was to endure for ever, it ought
to be considered whatfenfe that expreftion bears
in the Law it (elf. And that cxprefllon is there
ufed to denote the continuance of any thing
which was not defigned for ibme particular oc-
cafion or feafon only, but was to laft as long
as the nature and gerieral defign of its Inftitu-
tion
of the Chrijiian Religion. 325
tion would admit. The Servant whofe Ear
was bored, was to ferve his Matter for ever,
Exod. xxi. 6. by which is to be underftood,
not all his Life, but only tiH the year of Ju-
bilee ; whereas he that had not his Ear bored,
was to be fet free in the feventh year, ver. 2.
And even before the year of Jubilee, he. whofe
Ear was bored, might be freed with his Ma-
iler's Confent; (») either by ManumiiTion, O) G^t.
or Redemption, and was at liberty upon the *d Ioc*
death of his Matter, not being bound to ferve
his Son. Their anointing jhall furely he, an
ever la fling Priefihood throughout their Gene-
rations, Exod. xl. .15. which can be under-
ftood to extend no farther, than as long as
their Genealogies were preferved , and the
Tribe and Generations of the High-Priefts
could be diftinguifhed. / will alide in thy
Talernacle for ever, Pf. lxi. 4. or, in other
words, all the days of my Life, Pf. xxvii. 4.
Samuel was brought by his Mother to abide
before the Lord for ever ; that is, during his
Life, 1 Saw. i. 22. And by parity of Reafon
thofe Statutes and Laws are faid to be Ettabli-
fhed fof ever, which were defigned to be per-
petual and (landing Laws; not temporary,
during their journeying in the Wildernels only
as others were, but to continue as long as the
Conftitution of the Government was to laft ; (°) ^- de
and in this fenfe the Jews themfelves (0) have ^Jltat*
taken the word ; and it is fuffiriently explain'd
Deut. xii. 1 . Thefe are the Statutes andjudgwents
Y 3 which r
^2 6 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
which ye fhaR obferve to do in the Land, which
the Lord God of thy fathers giveth thee to pof-
fej's it all the days that ye live upon the Earth;
or as we read ver. 19. as long as thou livefi upon
thy earth ; that is, their Law was obligatory
to them as long as they had pofleflion of the
Land of Canaan\ or retained any right to pof-
fefs it by God's donation: But thole Statutes
and Judgments which were to be oblerved in
the Land which the Lord had given them to
pofleis, can no longer be of any obligation to
them, when they are finally deprived of that
Land.
The Ceremonial Law therefore by its Ori-
ginal Deilgn and Inftitution being to 'continue
In force but till the coming of Chrift, he gave
the accomplishment to it, and put a final pe-
riod to its Obligation, Inftituting his Gofpel in
its (lead, which had been pre-figured by the
Law, and foretold both by Mofes and the
Prophets.
CHAP. XVII. .
Of Sinful Examples Recorded in the
Scriptures.
AS fome have endeavoured to excufe their
own Sins by alledging the Sinful Exam-
ples which we find' mention 'd in the Scriptures ;
f! fo
of the Chrifiian Religion. 327
(o others,whoareno lefs fond of imitating them,
yet have from hence taken a pretence for Ob-
jections and Cavils. I fliall therefore (hew, that
the bad Examples in fome actions of Men whom
we find in all other refpedts commended in the
Scriptures, are far from being propofed for
our imitation; but there is great reafon why
the Faults'and Mifcarriages of the beffc Men
iliould be'deliver'd down to us in the Scriptures
for our Caution and Prevention, as well as up-
on other accounts.
I. Several paflages of the Scriptures contain
only Matter of FacT:, and that very briefly ex-
prefs'd; and a bare Narrative of any Action,
implies neither the Approbation nor the Cen-
fure of it, but only declares that fuch a thing
was done, and in fuch a manner : but the Na-
ture of theFadt it felf, with the Circumflances
of it, or fome Command or Permiilion, or
Prohibition in Scripture, muff, difcover the
goodnefs or lawfulnefs, or the wicked nefs
o£the Action. No Hiftorian is fuppofed to ap-
prove of all which he relates ; but he muft re-
port bad as well as good Deeds, who will do
the part of a faithful Hifiorian.
II. The Rules of Good and Evil are plainly
delivered in the Scriptures, by which we are to
judge of Adfcions ; and we are to conform our
Adhons not to the Example of Men, but to the
Law of God. We are forewarn'd to follow no
Man's Example, when it is contrary to the
Divine Law ; and therefore it could not be ne-
Y 4 • ceflary
328 The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
ccfiary in the relating of every evil Action to
let a mark of Infamy upon it, and a Caution
;ainft the imitation of it.
III. The Relation of the bad Actions of
Good Men may be of great ufe and benefit,
too' we are not to follow, but avoid them ;
Becaufc, ' .
1. This fhews the Sincerity of the Pen-Men
of the Scriptures, that they fpare no perfon
whitfoever, but relate the plain Matter of
Fact, even tho' thcmfel ves be concern'd, when
it is never fo much to. their difgrace ; as in the
Denial of ;St. Peter\ and other inftanoe.s
Xy this we learn the Frailty of Humane
Nature, and the necellary dependance that the
. befb Men mufl have upon God for his Grace in
the performing any good Action; Every good-
\}, and every perfect Gift is from alove9
Jam. i. 1 7.
3. We learn from hence, that God can bring
Good out of Evil, and doth often over- rule
even the word Actions to the accomplishment
of the bcfl Ends, and puiteth no Trufl in Bis
Saints, Job x v. 1$.
There is a Remarkable Inftancc to this pur-
pose in the Cafe of Jacob and Efau, when Ja-
cob came by fraud and fubtilty and depriv'd his
Cp)Cafaub. Brother of the BlelTing. (/>)Jtwas in An-
'' cient times cuflomary to offer that of which
they were to eat, in Sacrifice, efpecially on (6
Solemn an Occafion, as a Father's giving his
final Blefling ; and as in this Cafe, foretelling
tho
h Athecar.
of the Chriftian Religion, 329
the Kate of his Fofterity : And therefore when
Jacob had by fubtilty got the Blefling of his
Father, Ifaac could not recall it to conferr if
upon Efau, becaufe what was done in (b folemn
a manner had a Religious Obligation amount-
ing to that of an Oath ; and Oaths tho' ob-
tain'd by fraud were Obligatory, as we learn
from the Cafe of the Giheonites, he had bleffed
Jacob before the Lord; and the Prediction that
the Elder fliouldferve the Tounger,Gen. xxv. 23.
with Efaih defpifing and felling. his Birth-right
might now probably come into Ifaac 's Mind ;
whereupon, tho' he did not approve of the
fraud by which the BleiTing was obtain'd, yet
he knew it to be irrevocable, and that the Di-
vine Purpofe and Prediction would be accom-
plifh'd thereby ; and what he had by a Pro-
phetick Spirit conferr'd, it was not in his power
to recall. The Relation therefore of this Mat-
ter doth not juflifie Jacob's behaviour in it, but
manifefts the overruling Providence of God,
to malic any Means whatsoever inftrumental
to his gracious Ends, which can never be dis-
appointed by any Actions of Men : for if they
* depended upon humane Actions, thefe would
often fail them; the belt Men being fubject to
. fo much frailty and fin.
4. Tho' God pf his Mercy doth accept of
the imperfect Services of the Righteous, for-
giving upon their habitual Repentance the Sins
and Frailties which are mix'd with the befl
Actions; and pardoning the worfl Actions
*% likewile
• • •
2 go The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
likewife after a particular Repentance and A-
mendment of Life: yet thefe Hand upon Re-
cord for the glory of God's grace in their Re-
pentance and Forgivenefs, and for a memorial
and warning to future Ages ; that Men may
neither prefume upon their own Righteoufnefs,
nor defpair of God's Mercy. But becaufe they
are pardon'd, they are not always cenfur'd.
And I think the ill Actions of Good Men are
feldom or never mention'd . with a mark of
God's dilpleafurc, unlefs the Series of theHi-
flory require it; and then the reproof is men-
tion'd, which pafs'd at the time of the Com-
miilion of them; as in the Cafe of David, of
Hezekiah, and St. Peter. But where no fuch
Cenfure was pafs'd at the time of' the A&ion,
the Action it (elf is barely related, and nothing
further faid of it; becaufe the Crime being
forgiven, God forbears to jliew any further
difpleafure againft it ; fuch is his Mercy to Re-
penting Sinners* And there could be no ne-
ceflity, as I have obferv'd, for any Cenfure up-
on the account of others, who may know by
the plain Rule of God's word what Actions are
finful, tho' they are not always flyi'd fo in re-
lating the Commiflion of them.
CHAP.
rf*
pf the Cbriftian Religion, 331
CHAP. XVIIL
Of the Imprecations in the Pfafms, and
other Boohj of the Old Teftament.
ON E of the greateft Excellencies of the
Christian Religion is the IJniverfal Cha-
rity which it enjoyns ; and we lhall find that
Charity was likewife the Doctrine of the Old
Teflament, and that there is nothing in the
Book of Pfalrns, or any other part of the Old
Teflament, contrary to this Doctrine; which
will appear, if we confider the peculiar Rea-
sons for thofe expreflions, which may feem to
imply any thing contrary to it.
I. Many of thofe Expreflions are ufed in re-
ference to the. Nations, upon whom after fig-
nal Acts of Mercy and Forbearance on his part,
and repeated provocations on theirs, God had
commanded the Ifratlttcs to execute his Judgr
ments ; and the Sins of the People of Ifrael
were the caufe that this was not accomplilh'd :
and therefore it was lawfull for them to pray
that they might have grace to repent, and that
their Sins might be no hindrance to them in
the fulfilling his will ; but that God would en-
able them to execute vengeance upon the Heathen,
Pf. cxlix. 7. And it was lawful likewife to
I pray againfl all the other Enemies of God,
that he would abafe their Pride, and make them
to
3 5 2 ' The Keafonabknefs and Certainty
to how themfehes to he but Men, Pf. ix. 20.
lxxiv. 2,x, it,, cxxxix. 21, 22.
II. David being King, had the Sword of
Judice committed to him, he was the Mi-
nifier of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon
him that did evil; and therefore when his Re-
bellious Subjects were too ftrong for him, as
in the Rebellion of Abfalom, he might make
his Appeal to God, and befeech him to take
the matter into his own hand. If he might
puniih his Subjects, he might pray to Gocf
that he would enable him to do it. And in
foreign Wars, if he might kill his Enemies,
. he might pray for Victory and Succeis over
them.
III. It is lawful to pray that publick and no-
torious Malefactors may be punifh'd, for it is
lawful to difcover them, and bring them to pu-
nimment ; and it mull needs bejawful to pray
that that may be. done, which it is lawful for
us to do. It is lawful to leek redrefs of pri-
vate Injuries, and therefore it is lawful to pray
that they may be redrefs'd ; for we may pray
for fuccefs upon any honed undertaking. If
this be done out of a love to Judice, and a ne-
cefiary care of our own prefervation ; not out
of malice, and a third after Revenge, but with
the mod favourable condruction that the
word Actions are capable of, and with hearty
Prayers to God for his Blefling upon the Of-
fender ; in giving him the grace of Repentance,
and granting him whatfoever happinefs in this
World
of the Chrijlian Religion. 332
World may be confident with the honour of
God, and Juftice towards other Men, and the
Salvation of his own Soul.
IV. God was the peculiar Law-giver, and
Political Governour of the Jews; and Tempo-
ral Rewards and Punimments were the San-
ction of the Laws which lie had given them.
For the Mofakal Law is called the miniflration
of Death \ and the Miniflration of Condemnation^
2, Cor. iii. 7, 9. 'becaufe the promiies of the
Law, asfuch, belong'd only to this Life, and
a Curfe was denounc'd againfl every one, that
continue! not in all things which are written in the
Book of the Law to do them,Gah iii. ic, 11. God
had exprefly threatned to inflict Punifhment in
this Life, for the tranfgreffion of thofe Laws ;
and therefore tp pray to God that his Judg-
ments might overtake Evil-doers, was no more
than it is in other Governments, to proiecute
Offenders before the Magistrate, they appealed
to God to put his Laws in force againfl them,
and' not to naffer the wicked to go unpunihYd •
in contempt of thofe Laws, which he had, ap-
pointed, and under that difpenfation which
was eftablifh'd upon Temporal Rewards and
Punimments. They were not allow'd to in-
dulge their anger and defire of Revenge, yet
they might pray that God would avenge him-
felf of his Enemies, and refcue his Laws from
that contempt which they mull: lie under from
wicked Men, if they did not feel thofe punim-
ments which the Laws of God threatned them
withall. But
334 The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
But under the* Gofpel the Cafe is different ;
for now we are not to expect that Temporal
Rewards and Punifhments mould conftantly
follow upon the performance or tranfgrefiiori
of our Duty; but both of them may be com-
monly referved to a future State. A Chriftiaii
may not pray for Judgments. upon his Ene-
mies, becaufeGod has not fo peremptorily de-
clared by the Gofpel, that he will inflict his
Punifhments in this Life, as he had done by
the Law, and we have our Saviour's Com-
mand and Example to pray for their Repen-
tance, that they be .not punifhed in the next;
ButaChriftian may right himfelf in duecourfe
of Law ; and in order to that, may Petition
the Judge without any breach of Charity ; and
this was all that the Jews did, when they pray'd
God to execute his "own Laws, by inflicting
l'uch Punifhments as he had threatned to inflict
upon the Tranfgreflbrs of them in this Lifer
they invoked and appealed to God as their Po-
litical Judge and Sovereign, and pray'd Judg-
ment againfl Offenders.
V. Thofe which feerri Imprecations* are
oftentimes Predictions or Denunciations of
Judgments to come upon Sinners ; as we may
learn from Aft* i. 20. And it can be no un-
charitablenefs to foretell or denounce God's
Judgments againfl: Sinners, but rather an ef-
fect of Charity towards them for their Repen-
tance, and Amendment*
of the Chriflian Religion. 335
Mod of thofe places . of Scripture "may as
properly be rendred by way of prediction in
the Future Tenfe ; and when they cannot, they
may be look'd upon as denunciations of God's
Wrath. For Prophets were fometimes em-
ploy'd to execute the Divine Judgments^ai
we fee in Elijah, z Kings i. 9, 10. and as they *
fometimes executed God's Judgments, fb they
at other times denounced them ; and this had
nothing of uncharitablenefs in it,- but is fully
agreeable with the Gofpel it felf. For thus we
read that Ananias and Sapphira were punifhed
with prefent death by St. Peter, ,Atls v. But
if St. Peter had denounced Death without in-
flicting it immediately upon them , ' this
had been lefs. And ' St. Paul prays that the
Lord would reward Alexander the Copper- Smith
according to his works, who had done him much
evil, 2 Tim. iv. 14. which was no uncharitable
imprecation, but a leaving him to God's Judg-
ment, and a denunciation of punimment to
befall him without Repentance; it was an Au-
thoritative Aft, and in/confequence of that ex-
communication which' the Apoftle had inflicted
upon him, 1 Tim. 1. 20. And when God had
infpired and empower'd Men to denounce
Judgments, this was no more againft Charity,
than the inflicting of them would have been,
or than Excommunication it felf is. IfMagi-
flrates are empower'd ' in the King's Name to
give Sentence, and to inflift Punifliments,
certainly Men may be fo empower'd and au-
thorized
226 The Reafondbknefs and Certainty
thoriz'd by God himfelf, and may a& or fpeak
accordingly, without breach of Charity.
VI. The Expreffions Pf. Ixix. and cix. are
to be under flood concerning Judas, as we find
them applied, Alls i. and all other Expreffions
•f We fame nature may be underftood either
1 of him, or of fome others .like him, whom
the Pfalmift by infpiration might know to be
hardned in Sin, pafl Repentance, and there-
fore might pray that God would rather cut
them off, than fuffer them to do more mhchief
in this World, and increafe the number of
their Iniquities here, and of their Miferies in the
World to come.
VIL Laftly, This Suppofition is tacitly em-
ply'd in Imprecations, if they will perfifl in
their Sins, if they will not repent ; and the
Penmen of the Holy Scriptures might in fome
Cafes know by Revelation, that judgments
were the only means to reclaim thole Men
againfl whom they pray'd, and then it was the
greateft Charity to pray that God would be
pleafed to make ufe of that Remedy, which
alone was left for their Amendment ; as
Pfal. Ixxxiii. 15-, 16. So ptrfecute them with
thy tempefty and make them afraid with thyjlorm.
Fiji their faces with Jhame : that they may feck
thy Name, 0 Lord,
There is nothing therefore inconfiflent with
the Do£trine of Charity, and the Love of our
Neighbour in thofe places of Scripture, which
have been liable to the miftakcs of unwary
Men.
of the Chriftian Religion. 337
Men. For either they are Prayers to ' God to
enable the Israelites to do what he had appoint-
ed, as in the deilru&ion of the Qanaanites,
whom God was pleafed for wife and great Rea-
fons to piinifh by the Sword of the Children *
of Ifrael, rather than by Peftilence, or any
other Judgment. Or they are Prayers to God
to ailift them in the doing what both Juiliee
and Charity will allow to %2g|one, either by
Perfons in Authority, as King David, or even
by private Men ; as in the. profecution of Of-
fenders, and bringing them to condign puni.fli-
ment ; and this may be without any degree
of Malice, or the leaft breach of Charity ;
fine* Punifliment it felf may be not only an
acvt .of Juftice but of Charity likewife towards
divers Men. Or thefe ExpreiTions may be Ap-
peals to God as the Political Governour and Le-
giflator of the Jews : Or they are Predictions or
Denunciations of God's wrath againd Sinners.
And they may be direfted againft impenitent
obftinate Men hardned in their Wickednels.
Or, laftly, they may be only Prayers to God,
that he would inflicl: fuch Punimmencs upon
Men, as may-bring them to Repentance.
And tho' the Jews in latter Ages perverted
fome padages of their Law to ferve their own
Pride and Revenge ; yet, as it is evident by
many inftances, never any Law but that of
Chrift oblig'd Men to more Humanity towards
Strangers, or more. Charity towards Enemies.
They were certainly to Covet no Man's Houfe
Z or
3^8 The ReafonabUmfs and Certainty
or Wife, "and therefore the word Neighbour is
not to be limited to fignifieonly an Ifraelite or
a Profelyte, but is to be underftood of any
Man AvhatftJcver, Exod. xx. 1 7. Thoufialt Irue
him (the Stranger) as thy JPlf Lev.xix. 34.
The ^Egyptians are (tiled the Neighbours of the
Ifraelites,Exod. xi. 2. And Ffixv. 2, 3. where
acts of common Juftice towards Neighbours
are fpoken of; Qflfaeighbour mult necellarily
be underftood any perion, for to all Men Ju-
ftice is due. Not only Juftice but Charity was
enjoy nd towards Enemies. If thine Enemy he
hungry give him h read to eat, and if he be thirfty,
give him water to drink ; for thou fhalt heap
coals of fire upon hh head, and the Lord fo All re-
ward thee, Prov. xxv. 2 1, 22. which words fo
fully exprefs our Duty of Chriftian Charity,
that St. Paul could find none fitter to defcribe
it by, Rom. xii. 20. and Exod. xxni. 4, 5*. If
thou meet thine Enemies Ox or his Afs going a-
ftray, thou fhalt furely bring it back to him a-
gain. If thou fee the Afs of him thathateth thee
lying under his burthen, and wmildefl forbear to
help him, thou /halt furely help with him. And
in divers other places of the Old Teitament,
Charity towards Enemies is highly recom-
mended,and earneftly inculcated, Job xxxi. 29.
% Prov. xx. 22. xxiv. 29. Malach. ii. 10. Thou
fhalt love thy Neighbour as thy f elf , we read,
Lev. xix. 18. but thou fh 'alt hate thine Enemy, is
no where to be found in the Old Teftament ;
and therefore Matt. v. 43. it is to be taken as a
falfe'
'
of the Chriftian Religion. ggp
falfeglofsof the Interpreters of the Law, which
our Saviour rejects ; unlefs it be to be meant,
as Grot ins underflands it, of that enmity which
the Jews were to mew in all acts of Hoflility
towards the ieven Nations of Canaan, and the
Amakkites, Exod. xvii. i<5. xxxiv. u. Deut.
vii. i. xxv. 19. yet thefe very Nations were
not utterly excluded from becoming Proielites;
and to me it feems very remarkable, that tho'
the Children of Ifrael had received fuch hard
and cruel ufage in <£<gypty which is fo often
mention d in the Law of Mofes, they were ne-
verthelefs by the fame Law commanded not to
abhor an /Egyptian, but to admit the Children
of ^Egyptian Parents into the Congregation of
the Lord in the third Generation. Thou {halt
not abhor an ^Egyptian, becaufe thou waft a
Stranger in his Land, Deut. xxiii. 7. Thou
malt not abhor him, that is, thou fhalt not re-
venge upon him the injuries done thee, but
fhalt relieve him in time of diftrefs ; which
(q) Charity the Jews ever held themlelves (Wightf.
oblig'd to. extend to the Gentiles ; and there, is Tainmd.
reafon to fufpedt that they have been wrong'd Exmit. on
.in the reports of their uncharitablenefs to all of Matt.vi.2.
other Nations ; but any thing is eahly befcev'd
of a hated and defpifed People. And I am not
to vindicate their Practice, but their Law.
(r) Philo Judazm has an excellent Treatife, > . p..j
in which he difcourfeth at large upon this Sub- jud. mei
jedt, and mews to how great Humanity and vwfyv
Charity the Jews were oblig'd by the Law of *"?
Mofes. Z z CHAP.
340 Tlje Reafonablenefs and Certainty
CHAP. XIX.
Of the Texts of the Old. 7 eft anient cited
in the New.
THO' the Apoftles having prov'd their
Divine Commiffion by fo many and fo
undeniable Miracles had an infallible Autho-
rity to interpret and apply the Texts of the
Old Teflament in confirmation of the Gofpel ;
yet it is not to be doubted, but that the Cita-
tions, which feem to have mod difficulty in
them, are fuch as that the Jews of that time,
againft whom they were urged, could not but
acknowledge that the Apoftles gave the true
Expofition of them, tho' they deny'd that they
were truly apply'd to our Saviour, and *his
Gofpel. For unlefs the Apoftles had either
made out their Citations from the Old Tefla-
ment by Maximes and Principles then known
and receiv'd among the Jews, or had alledg'd
them in fuch a fenie, as was then generally ac-
kpowledg'd, it had been to no purpofe to al-
ledge them at all againft them. .
It is known likewife and obfcrvable upon,
this occafion,that after the Captivity in Bahylon^
tho' the Bible was read in the Synagogues in
the Original Hebrew, yet it was alio- Interpre-
ted into the vulgar Language, and the Inter-
preter did not always TranfJate the Text ver-
batim, but often gave the fenie of it in diffe-
rent words, and with fome latitude, to render
it
of the Chriftian Religion. 341
it the more intelligible. This way of Inter-
pretation was at length improv'd into ^ChaUee
Paraphrafe, containing with the Text a fhort
explication of it according to the fenfe of the
moft Learned among the Jews, tho' there mud.
be fuppofed to have been many Notions cur-
rent among them, which would not be
brought within the compafs of that Exposition.
The Writers therefore of the New Teilament
might fometimes giveiiich an Interpretation of
the Texts of the Old Teftament, as was as well,
or better known among them for whom they.
wrote, than the Greek or Helrew Text was ;
or they might take upon themfelves the liberty
of Interpreters, the better to explain the Texts
ajledged, and enforce their Arguments.
Thus for instance, St. Stepheny AEk vii.
would never have produc'd ' any thing out
of the Old Teftament before the Sanhe-
drim; nor would St. Luke have Recorded it
foon after; if it had been capable of any
difproof or confutation, whatever difficulties
at this diflance of time there may appear
to us to be in it. And ib in all other Cafes,
we may depend upon it, that the Apollles and
other Difciples, who had fuch demonftrative
Evidence for the conviction of Unbelievers by
a conftant power of Miracles, would never
make *ife of any Arguments to the Jews from
the Old Teftament, but fuch as they well knew
their Ad'verfaries could neveg»be able* to dif-
prove or deny. For there were then certain
' Z 3 Methods
um.
342 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
Methods of Interpretation, as we learn from
COjofcph. ( s ) Jofephus, which are now loft, and they
$jdji<i.\\b. difputed from acknowledg'd Maxims . and
ill. c 14- Rules : the only difference and matter of
difpute was in the application of them to their
particular cafe ; however our ignorance of
things, then generally known, may now make
it difficult to reconcile fome Texts of the New
Teftament with thole of the Old, from whence
they were cited.
F. Simon ( t ) in -his Critical Hiftory, has a
remarkable Pafiage upon this Subject. " The
" Book, fays he, where tUe raoft of that fort
" of Citations are found, is the Epiftle of
" St. Paul to the Hebrews, where we find no-
tc thing eife but paflages of the Old Teftament
" cxpjfin'd in a manner that is altogether Alle-
" gorical, and f6reign to 'the Letter ; which
" has alfo given an occafion to fome Writers to
" fufped", that St. Paul was not the Author.
" But it feems on the contrary, that if we re-
u fledtupon the Pharifees Method in their ex-
" pounding Scripture, it cannot be attributed
" to any other than to that holy Apoftle, who
" having ftudied in J erufa lem under the Doctor
" Gamaliel, did penetrate into all the moil re-
" fined points of their fecret and myftical In-
ft terpretations of the Bible. And indeed after
" I had recommended the reading of this Epi-
" file to a Jew, who was well read in his own
" ancient Autho^p, he having perufed it, freely
" declar'd, that it muft needs have been writ-
ten
of the Chrijlian Religion. 343
" ten by fome great («) Mekuial of his own («)4-*
•" Nation. And he was fo far from telling me %*[ai l'
tc that St. Paul had wrefted the true fenie of
" Scripture with his Allegories at pleailire,
" that he extolled his profound Skill in the
" iublime fenfe of the Bible, and always re-
" turn'd to his great Mekubal, of whom he ne-
" ver fpake but with admiration. /
Hoc in omnibus fcriptur is fafitlis ohfervandum
eft Apoftolos & Apo'lolicos viros in ponendis Te-
ftimoniis de veteri Tefiamento, non ver ha cen-
• fide rare, fed Jenfum, nee eadem Sermonum culcare
veftigia, dummodo a fenteniis non recedant,
Hieron. in Amos. c. v.
Ex quo perfpicuum eft Apoftolos & Evangeli-
ftas, & ipjum Dominum falvatorem ex He-
brcco transferre quod legerint, non cur antes de
fyUahis pun ft iff, verborum, dummodo fenten-
tiarum Veritas transjeratur, Id. in MaJach.
c. iii.
CHAP. XX.
Of the Incarnation and Death of the Son
of God.
TH I S is that Article of our Faith, which
was to the Jews a Stumbling-block, and
to the Greeks fooliftnefs, 1 Cor. i. 2 $. and has
ever been mofl liable to the Obje&ions of In-
Z 4 fidels;
Mxn
344 Ibe Reafonablenefs and Certainty
fidcls : and therefore I fhall take the more care
to give the cleared and iulleft account I can of
it.
I. I mail here confider the neceflity of the
Incarnation of the Son of God, for the fatis-
fadion of the Juftice, and the vindication of
the honour of God.
If. Tho' it fliould be fuppos'd, that God
could have pardon'd the Sins of Men upon any
other terms, than the death and fatisfaclion of
his own Son in our Fleih • I hope fully to prove,
that this is lo far from being unworthy of God,
that no other way of our Reconciliation, with
him (as far as we are able to apprehend.) could
have been fo becoming the Divine Wifdom
and Goodnels.
i. There feems to have been a neceffity for
the incarnation of the Son of God, for the fa-
fo&ion of Gods Juftice, and the vindication
of his Honour. • For God is Infinite Juftice as
well as Infinite Mercy ; and Infinite Juftice mud
puniih Offenders, unlefs full fatisfafrion be
made for the Offence; becaufe Infinite Juftice
muft demand to the utmoft extent of Juftice,
.{ muft require whatfoever can in Juftice be
demanded. But Irffinite Mercy found out a
Means to fatisfle this infinite Juftice; which Sa-
tisfaction could be made only by the Obedi-
ence and by the Death of the Son of God, who
by h\s Obedience unto Death, even the Death of
the Crofs, vindicated the Honour of God, by
performing in our Nature a perfect and abfo-
lute *
of the Chriftian Religion. 345
lute Obedience to all that ever God required
of Mankind, and by fuffering to the utmoftof
all that the Sins of the whole World deferv'd.
It is for the Honour of God, that his Laws
mould be exactly obferv'd, and obferv'd by
one who is of that very Nature, for which
they were ordain d ; and that Satisfaction
fhould be tnade in the fame Nature for the
Sins of it : Chrift therefore* taking our Na-
ture upon him paid down the uttermoft Farthing,
which in ftri&nefs of Juftice muft have been
demanded, but which could- never have been
paid by any Created Being, for the Sins of the
whole World : And he fulfill V/ all Righteoufnefs
in Obedience to the Divine Laws, which other-
wife could never have been fully obey'd. And
as far as God's juftice and Honour was con-
cerned to fee his Laws obey'd, and to demand
fatisfa&ion for the breach of them ; fo far the
Incan^jon of the Son of God muft be necei-
fary, becaufe thefe things could be perform'd
by no Creature. •
z. Tho' it fhould be'fuppos'd that God
could have pardon'd the Sins of Men *upon
other Terms than the death and (atisfadtion of
his own Son in our ftefh, yet the Incarnation
and Death of his Son is fo far from implying
any thing unworthy of God, that no other
way of our Reconciliation with him (as far as
we can apprehend,) could fo much have become
.the Divine Wifdom and Goodnefs.
Firft,
346 The Keajonablenefs and Certainty
Firft, There is nothing in this whole Dif-
penfation unworthy of God. Here I am to
confider that which was the great prejudice ta-
ken again ft the Chriftian Religion at its firft
Propagation, and is dill the great Objcftion of
the Enemies of the Gofpel of Chrift, and of
their own Salvation. They are apt to repre-
lent it to themfelves asan unneceflary thing,
and unworthy of God, that he fhould lend his
only begotten Son into the World for the Re-
demption of Mankind ; they imagine that the
Infinite Wifdom ^of God could have found out
other Methods of Salvation for us, and that
this would never have been made u(e of, if .
there could have been any other.
It might be enough in Aniwer to fuch Ob-
jections, to fay with the Apoftle; nay, but, 0-
Man, who art thou that reply 'eft agaittft Go A ?
fhall 'the Perlbn faved, fay unit) him that (aved
him, ivhy haft thou faved me thus} wWkme not
be contented to be faved, unlefs we ca^^e ful-
ly certified in all the Realbjas and Methods of
•• Salvation ? May not God bring to pals
our Redemption in fuch a way as he fhall lee
fitting, or lhall wequeflion his Wifdom, if his
Mercy be (b ..«iuch greater than we can com-
prehend? How infinite is his Mercy, and how
monftrous our ingratitude, if his goodnefs be
made an objection againit the truth of his
word, and be ailedgd as an Argument for our
Unbelief? What if God willing to /hew the
heinoufnefs of Sin, and to make known the riches
of
of the Chriflian Religion. 347
of his Mercy, . chofe this way for the Redemp-
tion of the World? What if many Reafbns
may be given why this Method was the mod
proper and expedient; and what if there might
be infinitely greater and better Reafons for it,
than all the wifdom of Man can conceive ?
But tho* the Revealed will and Cou'nfel of
God ought to-filence all Difputes in this as well
as in all other Cafes ; yet I think this Obje-
ction is capable of a vei*y plain and direct
Anfwer. For whatever weight there may
feem to be \n it, it is all grounded upon a
Miftake, and upon a wrong Notion of the .
Union between the Divine and the Humane
Nature of Chrift. For if the Godhead be not
fo united to the Manhood as to fufTer with it,
there is. no imaginable Reafon why its Union
with the Manhood mould be /uppofed to be
unworthy of God. I {hall therefore
1. Shew the unreafonablenefs of this Suppo-
fition, that the Union of the Divine and Hu-
mane Nature in Chrift iliould caufe the God-
head to fuffer with the Manhood.
2. 1 will prove that the Humiliation of the
Son of God in aflurrnng our Nature, may be
accounted for without luppofing that the God-
head fufler'd.
3. That the fatisfadion of Chrift by dying
for our Sins may be explain'd without it.
I. The unreafonablenefs of this fuppofition,
that tile Union of the Divine and Humane Na-
ture in Chrift mould caufe the Godhead to
fuffer
34$ The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
fufFer with the Manhood. This Objection
fuppofes the Godhead to be fo united to the
Manhood in the Perfon of our Saviour, as
that the Divine Nature muft really an^l pro-
perly partake in all the Sufferings which be-
fell his Perfon. It fuppofes, that Chrift, as
God, fufTer'd the Aliferies of Humane Life,
and at laft underwent Death upon the Crofs ;
which is fo far from being the Doc-trine of the
Gofpel, that it is no better than Herefie and
Blafphemy, and has always been rejected and
condemned as fuch by the Catholick Church.
That the Union of the Godhead with the
Manhood, mould render the Godhead capable
of Sufferings, as the Soul«by being united to
the Body becomes fenfible of its pains, is in-
deed a thing not only unworthy of God, but
impoffible to conceive. The Immortal and
ever-bleiled God can be fubject to nothing of
paffion or frailty. The Godhead is uncapable
of any imperfection, and therefore uncapable
of receiving any impreffions of Sufferings from
the Humane Nature, as the Soul doth from
the Body of Man. So that tho' the Union
between the Divine and Humane Nature in
Chriit be fitly explain'd by that between the
Soul and the Body in Man, yet the manner of
acting is very different. For Finite Beings can
mutually act and be acted upon by each other
in their feveral actions and paffions; but the
Divine Nature of Chrift being impaffible* could
fuffer nothing by all that was inflicted on the
Humane,
of the Chriflian Religion. 349
Humane, but remain'd infinitely Happy and
Glorious under all the Torments and Agonies
endur'd by our Saviour both in his Soul and
Body.
As God is pleas'd to aid and affifi: and fup-
port innocent and good Men in their fufler-
ings, and to direct and conduct them thro' the
courfe of their Lives: So God was not only
prefent with the Humane Nature of Chrilr,
but was fo united to it, as to become one Per-
fon with it; which, fince the Godhead could
fuffer nothing from it, is ,no more unworthy
of God, than if he had only guided him with
his Spirit, as he did the Prophets without any
perfonal Union. There is no inconvenience or
ablurdity in believing that God jliould by the
moft intimate and perfonal Union become
united to a Man, who did weep, and bleed,
and 6k. .For as God by this Union did not
change the Nature he had aflumed, or prevent
the •Sufferings of it, fo he did not partake in
them. No Man can deny tupon Principles
of Philofophy, but that it is very reafonable to
believe, that God may afford a more peculiar 1
preience to one Man than to another, and that
this Man may yet be fubject to Afflictions ;
and therefore the Son of God might become
united to the Soul and Body of Chrifl in as
intimate a manner as the Soul and Body are
united to each other in us; and yet this union
of the Divine Nature might not preferve the
Humane from the Sufferings incident to the
reft
gcjo 'the Reafonablemfs and Certainty
reft of Mankind, but mud leave it to fubmittoJ
them, tho' they were never fo grievous, when J
this was the very End and Defign of the!
Union.
It was not below the Majefty of God to be J
PerfonalJy united to a mod Innocent, and Sin- ]
Ms and Holy Man, tho' he was a Suffering!
and Afflicted Man ; and it is not the Perfonal
Union, as fome are apt to conceive, which j
could be any diminution to God's Glory, but j
their own error and miftake, in what they fur-
mife would be the confequence of fuch an I
Union.
II.The Humiliation of the Son of God in affu-
ming our Nature may be accounted for, with-
out iuppofmg that the Godhead fuffer'd. It was
the greateft condefcenfion and humiliation in
the Son of God to take upon him our Nature,:
For it is a gracious and merciful condefcenfion
for him to take care of us by his Providence.
God humhleth himfelf to behold the things that
are in Heaven and in the Earth, Pf. cxiii. 6.
But fome times and in fome places he is in a
more peculiar manner prefent upon Earth,
and that is an extraordinary condefcenfion; tho'
lie is always the fame in himfelf, and never the
lefs prefent or the lefs happy in Heaven. But
it was the moft wonderful condefcenfion in
God to unite himfelf to our Humane Nature,
and to become one Perfon with it, and ib to
die for us ; tho' his Divine Nature did not and
could notfuffer, but only the Humane Nature
to i
of the Cbriflian Religion. 351
to which it is united. He was not afhamed to
call Men his Brethren, and in all things to he
made like unto his Brethren, Hebr. ii. ft, 17.
but vouchfafed to ailume our Nature in its
lowed Condition, and to be fo ftriQIy and
personally united to the moll afflicted of all
the Sons of Men, as to afcribe all his Suffer-
ings to himfelf, for the benefit of all Man-
kind.
It is the Infinite Mercy of God to vouch-
fafe us the comfort of his prefence in anyway
ormeafure: but it is the moll: afronilhing and
adorable act of his goodnels, that he would be
pleas'd fo far to condefcend, as to take our ve-
ry Nature upon him, that he might be born,
and might die for our fakes. And that which
magnifies his mercy and goodnels in- the higheft
meaiure, is certainly molt worthy of the good
and merciful God.
III. The fatisfa&ion of Chrift by dying for
our Sins, may be explain'd without fuppofing
that the Godhead fuder'd. The Chriftian
Faith is, That as the Reafonahle Soul and Flejb
is one Man, fo God and Man is one Chrift ; and
that this Perfon confiding both of God and
Man united, differed for our Salvation : But
that all the Sufferings were indicted on the
Humane Nature, and terminated in it. But by
vertue of the Perfonal Union of his Divine
with his Humane Nature, all Chrid's Suffer-
ings receiv'd an infinite value and merit, and
became entituled and afcrjb'd to God himfelf,
. • becaule
552 "the Reafonabknefs and Certainty
becaufe they were undergone by that Perfon,
who is God as well as Man, tho' they were
not undergone by him in his Divine, but only
in his Humane Nature.
Thus God is faid to have purchasd his Church
with his own blood, Acts xx. a 8. For Actipns
and Pallions in any perfon are Perfonal,
and are attributed to the whole perfon ;
and fometimes thofe Actions and Paffions,
which can be perform'd in one of thofe Na-
tures only, which constitute a perfon, are yet j
attributed to the other Nature, which is un-
capable of them otherwife than by that rela-
tion which refults from the union of both Na- I
tures ; whereby all things that befall the per-
fon, may be affirmed of it as fuch, and there-
fore haverefpe£t to both the Natures, of which ']
it confifts, and may be apply'd to it, under
the denomination of either of them. All the
Souls that came. out of. the loins of Jacob were fe-
uenty Souls, Exod. i. 5*. If a Soul touch any un-
clean thing. Lev. v. 2. And the Soul that eateth
of it, fhall bear his Iniquity, Lev. vii. 1 8, 2,0.
In theie, and many other places of Scripture,
Actions and Pallions peculiar to the Body, are,
by reafon of the union of the Soul and Body,
attributed to the Soul. Nay, both in the He-
brew and the Greek Text the Saul is fometimes
put for the Body, even of a dead Man,
*Cned ^ ^e?' XX** ll' XXlU 4' m wmcn **en^ ^ B»moP
Arc.v! Pear fin explains Atls ii. 27. Vf. xvi. 10.
And
of the Chriflian Religion. 353
And in other places the Body or FJefli is
often taken for the whole Man, and that is at-
tributed to it, which the Flefh is of it felf un-
capable of. The Flefh diftin&ly confidered,
and apart from the Soul can neither Sin, nor
Pray, nor Underftand, nor Worfhip, nor par-
take of the Spirit, nor be Juftified ; and yet
all thefe things are afcribed to the Flefh, with-
out any mention made of the Soul. All Flefh
had corrupted his way upon the Earth, Gen. vi. 12.
0 thou that hear eft Prayer, unto thee Jhall all
Flefh come, Pf? lxv. 2. And all Flefh fhall know,
that I the Lord am thy Saviour, and thy Re-
deemer, the mighty one of Jacob, Iia. xlix. 2 6.
All Flefh fl?all come to worfhip before me, faith
the Lord, lfa. Ixvi. 23. And all Flefh fhall fee
the Salvation of God, Luke iii. 6. / will pour
out of my Spirit upon all Flefh, A£ts ii. 17.
Joel ii. 2,8. By the works of the Law fhall no
Flefh he juftified, Galat. ii. 16. And we fay
in our own Language, any Body thinks, or any
Body under ft and s ; tho' we all know, it is the
Soul, and not the Body, which thinks, and
underflands. It is very ufual in other Books,
and very agreeable to the ftile of Scripture,
and to the common fpeech and kn(e of Men,
for thofc Actions of a Perfon to be attributed to
one of the united Natures, which could be
perform'd only in the other. And the Union
between the Godhead and the Manhood being
like that, which is between the Soul and- the
Body, the Son of God is laid to have Suf
A a ftred,
>
2^4 ^e Re<*fonablenefs and Certainty
fered, and the Son of Man to have come down
from Heaven ; not that the Godhead Suffered,
or that the Humane Nature or Chrift was in
Heaven before his Incarnation, but according
to the ufual ftile of Scripture, the Union be-
tween the Divine and Humane Natures entitles
the Perfon confiding of them both, under the
denomination of either Nature, to that w hich
was done in the other, tho' as the Humane
Nature did not partake of the perfections of
the Divine ,• fo neither did the Divine Nature
partake of the fufferings of the Humane. But
both Natures being personally united, the per-
fon is fometimes denoted by one, and fbtne-
times by the other Nature.
All the Objections againfc the Incarnation
of the Son of God proceed upon the like mi-
flake with theirs, who are apt to imagine that
it is unworthy of God to be every where, and
in all places, to. behold and be preient at the
word of Actions ; as if the Sun's brightneis
would not be the more relplendent and glori-
ous, if it could penetrate into the obfeured
corners and receflts of the Earrh ; or as if his
Rays could be (allied and defiled by the foul-
nels of any Object which they ihine upon.
And if it be no diminution to God's Infinite
Glory and Majedy to be Omniprefent, it can
be none to be more nearly and even Perfonal-
ly united to fome part of the Creation ; and
therefore it cannot be unworthy of God to be
fo united to the Humane Nature, to manifed
his
of the Chriflian Religion. 355
his love and favour, and extend his goodnefs
to Mankind. As God is, every where prefent,
fo he is in a more efpecial manner prefent in
fome places than in others by the acts of his
Power, or of his Grace and Favour ; and he
has vouchfafed a more efpecial prefence to
fome Perfons than to others ; and thus he was
prefent with his Prophets, who were fent to
prepare for and foretell ChrifVs coming. But
he was perfonally united to the Humane Na-
ture of Chrift. And this is the highefl Ho-
nour and Advancement to our Nature, for God
thus to aflume it ; but it can be no diminution
to the Divine Majefty, becaufe God continues
as he was from all Eternity, without any alte-
ration ; only by his perional Preience and
Union with our Humane Nature, he caufes all
the performances and fufferings of it to be me-
ritorious, for the Salvation of Mankind.
The Son of God did not fo come down
from Heaven as to be no longer there, but to
forfake his Father's Kingdom: He itill conti-
nued in Heaven in the 'fame Blifs and Glory,
that he enjoy d with his Father from all Eter-
nity, tho' he fo manifefted himfelf to the
World, as to come and abide in it by afluming
our Humane Nature. Our Saviour tells Nico-
demus, Joh. iii. 13. No Man hath afcended up
to Heaven , hut he that came down from He.iven,
%even the Son of Man which is in Heaven. He who
fills Heaven, and Earth with his preience, was
Hill in Heaven as much as ever, with refpect
A a 2, to
•
3 5 6 The Reafonableneff and Certainty
to his Godhead, tho' he made a more pecu-
liar refidence than he had before done on
Earth, by dwelling in our Nature here. The
Son of God who is at all times every where
prefent, is yet in a peculiar manner prefent,
where ever he is pleas'd to manifeft himfelf by
peculiar ads of his goodnefs and power, as he
was pleas'd to do in a mod ftupendous man-
ner in that Flefli which he took upon him of
the Bleflcd Virgin. And it cannot be thought
inconfiftent with the Majefty of God to actu-
ate the Humane Nature, and to be joyned in
the. moil ftrict and vital union with it, fuppo-
ilng God only to aci upon it, and not to be
a&ed upon by it, nor to furfer the miferies
and feel the pains which the Humane Nature
endures ( which would be Blafphemy to ailert
of the Divine Nature of Chrift) but to be in
Heaven Hill in his full Power and Majefty.
But fome Man will fay, how is this Union be-
tween the Divine and Humane Nature in
Chrift made, or wherein doth it confift ? To
whom we may reply, as our Saviour fome-
■ times did to the Serines and Pharifees, by ask-
ing another Quefiion, and enquiring, how the
Body and Soul in Man are united ? or how
God is prefent in all places ? and how in him
we live, and wove , and have our Being? And
if no Man can tell how thele things arc, tho^
no Man can deny the truth and reality of them,
then it is not to be expected, that we mould
be able to tell how the union between the Di-
vine
of the Chriflran Religion. 3^7
vine and the Humane Nature inChrifh is made,
or in what it confifts. We' mud acknowledge
it a Myftery, which it is above any Man's ca-
pacity to explain ; but that there is fuch an
union, we learn from the Scriptures, and thi-
ther we appeal for the truth of it.' And the
putting fuch Queftions, argues either a great
mind to cavil, or great inconfideration, and
fhortnefs of thought. For what Man is there
pretending to Reaibn and Argument, of Co Ik-
tie obfervation, as not to take notice, that of
all the things which we daily fee and perceive
to be in the World, the nature and manner of
exigence of very few or rather of none of them
is fully underflood by us ? It is fumcient for
us to know, that great Reafons may be given
for this difpenfation of the Son of God incar-
nate, and that no Material Objection can be
framed againft it.
Secondly, No other way (as far as we can
apprehend) could have been fo proper and ex-
pedient, as the incarnation of the Son of God,
to procure the Salvation of Mankind, and
therefore none could fo well become the Di-
vine Wildom and Goodnefs. The proof of this
mult depend upon the Reafons for Chrift's co-
ming into the World, and they are all com-
prehended in this one thing, the abolifhing or
taking away of Sin. And ye know that he was
manifefted to take away our Sins, and in him is
no Sin, 1 Joh. iii. 5. WTe are to confider then,
that the manifeftation of Chrift in the FJefh,
. A a 3 did
35$ The Keafonablemfs and Certainty
did more powerfully and effectually take away
Sin, than any other way or means of Salva-
tion could have done.
I. The Doctrine and Preaching of the Son
of God had more Power and Authority with it
" than 'the Preaching and Doctrine of a Man or
Angel could have had. God, who at fundry
times and in divers manners [pake in time paft
unto the Fathers hy the Prophets, hath in thefe
laft days fpoki n unto us hy his Son, whom he hath
appointed Heir of all things, hy whom alfo he
made the Worlds, Hebr. i. 1,2. therefore we
-■h't to give the more earneft heed to the things
which we have heard, left at any time we fhould
let them flip. For if the word fpoken hy Angels
was ftedfaft, and every tranfgrefflon and dijole-
dieme receivd a juft recom pence of reward, how
fjpall we efcape, if we negletl fo great Salvation,
which at the fir (I hegan to he fpoken hy the
Lord, and was confirmed unto us hy them that
heard him > Hcb. ii. 1,2,3. This being the
In ft Mcflagc which God had refolv'd to fend to
Mankind, a Perfon of the greateft Dignity and
Authority was to bring it: But laft of all he
fent unto them his Son, faying, they will re-
rcrence my Son, Matt. xxi. 37. „ It is the laft
expedient, and the very utmoft that could be
done to reduce Sinners to Obedience ; and if
this will have no effect upon them, they muft
be left without all excufe. This is the heavieft
sggravation of Sin, and that which renders
Men utterly inexculable ; he was in the World,
and
of the Chriflian Religion, gcjp
and the World was made ly him, and the World
knew him not. He came unto his own, and his
own received him not, Joh. i. 10, 11. If the
only begotten Son of God had not come and
manifested himfelf in fo wonderful a manner
to the World, fomething of a Plea might have
been pretended ; but to reject the Son of God
was an evident defpight done to the Father,
and even hating of the Father who had fent
him, as our Saviour declares, Job. xv. %2,
2,3*2.4. And the Blafpheming of theJHcrfy
Ghoft in thofe, who vilified the Miracles of
Chrill, and afcribed them to Beelzebub, was
therefore without forgivenefs, becaule it was
a*rejecting of Chrill, not as the Son of .Man,
but as God blefied for ever ; and a defpifing
and vilifying that which is the laft means that
can be ufed to reclaim the World ; and that
means whereby he raanifefted himfelf to be
the Son of God. To reject Chrift, was to re-
ject the whole Trinity, which was jointly
concern'd in this wonderful difpenfation.
The Dignity of Chrift's Perfon adds all
the force and efficacy to his Doctrine that is
poffible ; and therefore it was requifite that the
Son of God mould become incarnate. God
had before fpoken from Heaven, but that was
too terrible and full of Majefty to be born by
Mortals; and they that heard the voice, en-
treated that the word fhould not he fpoken to them
any more : for they could not endure that which
was Commanded ; and [0 terrible was the fight,
A a 4 that
\6o The Keafonabknefs and Certainty
that Mofes /aid, I exceedingly fear and quake ',
Heb. xii. 1 9, 20, 21. But now God was plcas'd
to converie with Man in a more familiar and
humble manner ; and our Ble/Ied Saviour came
to live amongft Men with all the gcntlencfs
and meeknefs of the Humane Nature, and all
the Authority of the Divine. For in him dwel-
led all the Fullnefs of \ the Godhead Bodily <9
Colof. ii. 9. The Godhead dwelt here in him
under our Humane Nature, laying afide that
awful Majefty, which no Man can approach
unto.'
II. We have a greater Example of all per-
feflion and Holinefsfet before us by the Son cf
God Incarnate, than we could otherwife have
had. It has been the general complaint made
of other Teachers and Lawgivers, that they
feldom obferve their own Rules, or live them-
selves according to what they require of others.
But our Saviour has given us an Example, if
it be poflible, even beyond his own Doctrine.
For tho' he be no rigorous Lawgiver, but a
mod indulgent and gracious Mailer to us, yet
he was pleas'd to excufe himfelf from no Duty
or Inflance of Obedience, but fulfilled both the
Moral and" the Ceremonial Law : there is no-
thing fo mean, nor ib difficult and painful but
he performed it, to fet us an ablolnte Pattern
oi Obedience to the Whole Duty of Man, in
hat ever God requir'd of Mankind. It be-
\me him to fulfill all Right eoufnefs ; 'this Was
le end and intention of his coming into the
World,
of the Chriflian Religion. 26
World, and he fulfilled it in the mofh abfolute
and perfect manner, in all particulars. And
to give fuch an Example, is of unfpeakable ufc
and benefit : for Men are more eafily led by
Example than by Precept ; and it is common-
ly obferv'd, that it is Example for the mod
part which governs the World. Men will fol-
low the Vices of thofe whofe Vermes they ne-
ver imitate; and the Faults of Wife and Great
Men have too fure and too fatal an efteft upon
fuch, as their Excellencies never reach.
It was neceflary that an Example of abfo-
lute perfection fhould be given to the World,
and this Example muft be given by one of the
fame nature with our felves, or elfe it might
have beenan Example for Angels and Spirits,
but not for Men ; and therefore fuch an Ex-
ample the Son of God Incarnate only could
give, becaufe it was impoflible for any created
Being under all the Infirmities and Tempta-
tions incident to Humane Nature to live up to
fuch a Divine Height and Excellency of all per-
fection as our Saviour did, and to leave fuch
an Example to the World.
He came not to teach us the wjfdom of this
World, how to get Riches and Honours ; in
this Mankind was well enough inftrucled be-
fore, and itcbuld not but be unworthy of the
Son of God to be Born into the World with a
defign to enjoy the pleafures and the profits,
and the honours of it, this was beneath the
Majefty of Heaven, and the Infinite Perfection
and
z6z TlIk Keajonabknefs and Certainty
and Eilcntial Bltfs and Happinefs of the Divine
Nature. But tomamfed himlelf, to fliew the
mean and worthlefs Vanity of thofe things, of
v. hich Men are fo fond ; to give an Example
of Contentment in a low Condition, of Vi-
ctory under Temptations and of Patience and
Meekncfs under the levered: Afflictions and
Torments; to difcover to Men the way to
Happinefs in" the word Circumftances of this
World, to teach thofe who enjoy this World's
goods, not to be proud of them, nor defpife
others, and thofe who want them ; to be con-
tented and happy without them, to lead Men
in the way to happinefs thro' all Conditions,
thro' .all the Mileries and Calamities which
mud befall many of us in this Mortal State ;
this is a Glorious and Godlike Defign, it is
fuch as none but the Son of God could per-
form, and fuch as we may in realon believe
he would undertake ; and for which he
. might vouchfafe to live a Humane Life upon
Earth.
HI. The Mediation and Intcrceflion of
Chrid: for us is of greater power and effi-
cacy, than -any could have been, if the
Son of God had not become Man to die for
our fakes. There is one God, and one Mediator
hetween God and Mejt, the Man Chrifl Jefus,
i Tim. ii. 5. he was to be Man as well as God,
that coming with Divine Power and Autho-
rity, and yet with the Affability and Accefli-
blenefs of a Man, he might in all refpe&s be
fully
of the Cbriflian Religion. 363
fully qualified to perform the Office of a Me-
diator between God and Man.1 If he had not
I been God, be could not have come with abfo-
lute Authority to offer us Terms of Reconcili-
ation; and unlefs he had been Men, he could
not have treated with Men in fo familiar and
condefcending a way upon thefe terms.
And the Right and Authority of Chrifts
Mediation and interceMion in behalf of Sin-
ners, is founded upon his merits and fatisfa-
clion for the Sins of Men ; and this fuppofes
him to be both God, and Man ; Man, that he
might Suffer and Die for us ; and God, that
his Divine Nature might give an infinite value
to his Death and Sufferings, and render them
fatisfa&ory for the Sins of the World. Tho*
it fhould be fuppofed (which can never be
proved) that God in his Mercy might have
pardoned Sinners without the fatisfaclion of
Chrift; yet if in mercy he might have for-
given, he might in juftice have punifh'd them,
unlefs fatisfadtion had been made ; and nothing \
could have "made fatisfaclion to his Juftice, bur
the Sufferings of Ills Son. The Obedience and
Sufferings of no Created Being could have
been of that value as to make fatisfa&ion for
the Sins of Mankind ; and therefore no Crea-
ture could have Redeemed Man, or have be-
come Mediator for him upon the terms of his
own merits in Man's behalf, fo as to plead the
price of Redemption laid down for him. God
may grant the Requefts of Angels and Men,
out
3^4 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
out of his free Mercy and Bounty, but there
can be no necojfory force and efficacy in In-
terceihons, where there is no precedent merit
and fatisfadtiop on the part of the InterceiTbr.
But Chrift pleads his merits on our account,
and mediates our Caufe with his Father upon
the terms of ftrict Juftice, and by vertue of
the Ranfom of his own Blood ; and is fo pow-
erful an InterceiTbr for us, that not only' the
Mercy and Goodneis, but even the Jufhce of
God cannot deny his fnterceflion. it was the
free grace of God to fend his Son tp Suffer in
our Head, but fince he was pleas'd to admit of
.this Commutation of the Punifliment which
we had deierv'd, and to tranterr it upon his
own Son ; his Death was a fu/l, perfect, and
'fit Sacrifice, Oblation and Satisfaction for
j Sins of the whole World ; which the death
no Creature could have been, and therefore
no Created Being could have become our Me-
diator by vertue of his own Merit, and have
fatisfy'd the utmoft Juftice of God; much lefs
could any Creature have merited the afliit-
ance of Grace, and the Rewards of Glory for
us. . ' •
IV. The Incarnation of the Son of God is
the mod effectual means to excite in us Faith,
and Hope, and Charity, and unfeigned Love
of God and of our Neighbour, the love of Ver-
tue, and the hatred of Sin ; and to difpofe and
engage us to all Vertue and Piety. The Son
of God aiiuming our Nature, gives us the
greatefl
of. the Chriflian Religion. a^j
greateft afllira nee of his companion for our In-
firmities, and his defire of oar Happinefs. God
is infinitely merciful in his own Divine Nature,
but he never could give fuch an .inftance of
his mercy and love towards ours, as by taking
it upon himlelf ; God is eflential Truth and
Holinefs; and yet willing wore abundantly to
jhew to the Heirs of Promife the immutability of
his Counfel, he confirm d it with an Oath ; and
in like manner in the prefent Cafe, God being
willing to give us all the grounds for Faith
and Confidence in him that can be imagined,
took our Nature upon him, that by two immu-
table things, in which it was impoffible for God
to deceive^ we might have a flrong Ccnjclaticn,
both from the goodnefs of the Divine Nature,
and from the tendernefs and companions of our
own. For we have not an Htgh-Prieft^ who can-
not be touched with the feeling of our Infirmities y
and therefore are exhorted in tfris confidence,
to come boldly unto the Throne of Grace, Heb. iv.
15-, 16. vi. 17, 18. We are a flu red, that he
has the greateft concern for that Nature which
he has taken into a perfonal Union with him-
felf, and continually prefents before his Father
in Heaven for us. And we are likewife allured
of the ^Father's love towards us,* For now we
know that he loves us, feeing he has not with-
held his Son, his only Son from us,- but lent him
into the World to die ipr our Salvation. He
that fpared not his own Son, but deliver d him
up for us all ; how fiall he not with him alfo
freely
$66 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
freely give us all things ? Who /hall lay any thing
to the charge of God's Elect ? It is God, that
juftifietb, who is he that condemneth ? it is Chrift ]
that died, yea rather that is rifen again, who is j
even at the right hand oj God, who alfo maketh I
Interceffion for us, Rom. viii. 32, 33, 34.
And as the manifeftation of Chrift in the 1
Fleih is peculiarly adapted and defign'd to raife ]
our Faith and Hope, andTruft and Confidence I
and Dependance upon God, fo it is above all
the moll prevailing motive to ■ engage our I
Love. The infinite Love of Chrift in dying
for us, muft needs require and even extort j
from us all pofllble returns of Love and Praife i
OJ chry- and Adoration, (y ) St. Chryfoftome gives this 1
Tom!'"'."" as one Reaf°n> w^y tne S°n °f God was In- I
carnate, to become the Saviour and Redeemer
or Mankind ; becaule if it had been poffible for |
a Creature to undertake and efTedr. our Re-
demption, Men would never have thought
they could have had efteem enough for him,
or have made due expreifions of their grati-
tude, unlefs they had Deified him, and com-
mitted idolatry inWorfhippinghim, and pay-
ing him all Divine Honours:, and to prevent
this in Mofes, who was but a Temporal De-
liverer, and but a Type of Chrift, his Sepul-
chre was conceal'd from the Ifraelites. So
dear is the memory of great and generous Be-
» nefactors wont to be^ that Men are apt to
think they never can be fufficienfly grateful to
them, unlefs they even adore and worihip
them j
of the Cbrijiiaiu Keligign. ^6j
them, which was one chief occafio#of Idola-
try among the Heathens ; therefore the Re-
demption of the whole World was a thing that
could belong only to the Son of God, to whom
all Love and Reverence, all Worfhip and Ado-
ration is due. And this being the great Aim
and Deflgn of the Chriftian Religion to bring
us to obey God upon Principles of Love, the
Foundation of it is laid in the Love of God to-
wards us. Nothing can be conceiv'd, which
could have fo powerfully prevail'd upon Men
to love God, as the Incarnation of his Son ;
and Love being the only principle of Obedi-
ence, which can be acceptable to God, this
mud be the moft proper and fitting difpenfa-
tion, which is moft apt to excke in us the
Love of God. The Power and Majefty of God
had been manifefted before in the Creation and
Prefervation- and Government of the World,
and in many fignal Judgments upon Sinners :
the Divine Mercy and Goodrlefs was likewife
vifible in the daily Bledings' beftowed upon
Mankind, but the exceeding Riches of his Grace
was -made known in his kindnefs towards us
thro Chrifi Jefus, Ephef ii. 7. '
And as this mull caufe us to. love God, fo
it muft make us, if any thing can do it, to
have love one for another. God Incarnate is
the Head and Vital Principle, the common
Bond of Life and Union between Chriftians;
and we are oblig'd to mutual Love, not only
becaufe we are all of the fame Nature, but be-
caufe
g 68 'the Reafonablenefs and Certainty
caufe the^on of God has been plcas'd to digni-
fie that Nature in afluming it. This ought to
make us value our own Nature, and to have a
due efteem and affection for it, in whomfoever
it be. How can we defpife any one who is a
Partaker of that Nature, of which the Son of
God has vouchfafed to partake in its meaneft
Condition? or hate any, whom lie loved fo
well as to die for him ? This makes all Men
worthy of our refpecl: and love, not of our
contempt or hatred ; they are of that Nature,
which Chrift, as Man, is of, and they are his
Purchafe, and we muft love what is his, and
what he has fo dearly paid for, if we love
Chrifl himfelf. Beloved, fays St. J ohn, if God
fo loved us, we ought alfo to love one another,
i Joh. iv. ii. And this is St. Paul's Argu-
ment to the Corinthians to excite them to Cha-
rity toward^ their poor Brethren. For ye know
the Grace of our Lord Jefus Chrift, that tho he
was rich, yet for your fakes he became poor,
that ye thro his poverty might be rich, z Cor.
viii. 9.
The. Incarnation of the Son of God mufl
likewife caufe 'us to have the greateft hatred
and deteftation of Sin, as being that which is
mod difpleafing to God, and that which occa-
sioned the death of his only Son to atone for
it. And it is evident, that all who neglect fo
great Salvation, muft expect the heavieft: Pu-
niJhment for fo heinous a Contempt and Pro-
vocation :
of the Chriflian Religion* *$&
vocation: if we will be gained by any me-
thods of Love, Chrift has done all that is poP
fible to effecl: it : But if we will not be moved
by all the kindnefs and companions of Love it
felf, we can hope for no further favour ; if
the Son of God came to die for us, and we
will not regard it fo as to be made the better
by it, nothing more can be look'd for, but
Wrath and fiery Indignation.
So .that the manifestation of the Son of
God in the Flelh was the moft proper and fit-
ting means to work upon the Love, and Fear,
and Hope, and all the Paflions of Mankind,
and to produce all thofe Graces in us which
the Gofpel requires. It is the beft fitted both
to the Nature and Defign of the Gofpel, and
to the Nature of Man ; and therefore if any
other Means had been pollible, yet none that
we can conceive could have been (o effe&ual
to procure the Salvation of Men.
Bb CHAR
a 70 Tfee ReafonabUnefs and Certainty
CHAP. XXL
Of the Fulnefs of Time, or the Time ap-
pointed by God for the Incarnation of
our Bleffed Saviour.
s
Ince we have fo great Evidence to fatisfie
J us that Chrift did come into the World,
and die for us, it would be the greateft in-
gratitude and folly as well as Impiety to re-
la him, tho' we ftiould not be able to give
any exaft account concerning the Rea-
fons for the time of his coming. It is not for
us to how the Times or the Seafons, which the
Father hath put in his own power Acts 1. 7.
Thefe things are in God's difpofal, and unleis
we can be contented to leave the manner and
circumstances of our Salvation to his Wifdom,
we only mew how little we deferve his Mer-
cies, and how unwilling we are to believe
them, and to accept of them. But tho it be
a mere Cavil to difpute the coming or Uinit
upon a bare Circumftance and Nicety concern-
ing the Reafons for the particular time or his
Incarnation; yet it will be eafie to give fuch
an account of the time appointed for the In-
carnation of our Bleffed Saviour, as may ferve
to filence all Objections againft it; and to de-
fire to know any further of it is an ulele s and
unwarrantable Curiofity ', for all mud acknow-
ledge
i of the Chriflian K eligion. %ji
ledge that God may have the beft and wifefl:
Reafons for his Difpenfations, which yet we
may not be able to comprehend, and which it
doth not concern us to know. The Scripture
teacheth us that Chrift was born in the Fulnefs
of Time, when all things were fulfilled and ac-
complifhed in order to it, and the World was
in a due readinefs and preparation for his
coming.
i. God had beforehand us'd all other means
to ihew the neceflity offending his Son at laft,
for he was trot to be fent but upon neceflity ;
and it was fit they to whom he was fent, mould
be fenfible of that neceility, that they might
the better know how to value the infinite
mercy of God towards them, in fending his
only Son to be born and to die for them. In
the beginning of the World, and at the Re-
peopling it after the Flood, Revelations were
fo frequent, and the Will and Commands of
God io well known, and his promife to fend
his Son fo clearly under flood, that there could
be no neceffity that Chrift . mould be Born
then, fince their Faith in him and their Obe-
dience to God's Commandments was as effe-
ctual to the Salvation of them that lived fo
long before his coming, as it is to us, that
live fo many Ages.after it. The Lives of Men
in the beginning of the World were fo long,
and the generations decealed were fo few be-
fore the Flood, that nothing but wilmjl igno-
rance and negligence could be the caufe of fo
Bb 2 much
L
272 The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
much wickednefs. And after the Flood, ' the
Race of Mankind being redue'd to fo few Per-
fons, the Example and Inftru&ions of Noah
and Abraham, and the other Patriarchs might
have been fufhcient to keep Men within the
meafures of their Duty, and to prelerve a be-
lief and expectation of the promis'd Meffiah,
For they were faved by their Faith in Chrift to
come, as we muft be faved by Faith in him al-
ready come fo many Ages paft ; and therefore
to fuppoie it neceflary that he mould be Born
in thofe Ages, we mull: fuppofe it neceflary
that he mould be Born in every Age of the
World, which I think no Man will imagine.
But when the reft of the World was gene-
rally fallen away to Idolatry, God chole to
liimfelf one Perfon, from whom by a courie
of Miracles he raifed a mighty Nation, who by
their Journeyings and Captivities,and by all the
difpenlations of his Providence towards them,
were appointed to make known his Name and
Truth among the Gentiles. In the time of
Mofes this People it felf was uncapable of that
pure and Spiritual Worfhip which the Meffiah
was to appoint, and flood in need of a Cere-
monial Law and Service to reftrain them from
Idolatry, and topreferve the fenle and remem-
brance of the Promifes and Laws deliver'd to
Adam, and Noah. And this Ritual Service
was unworthy that the Meffiah mould come
purpofely to appoint it, who was indeed him*
felf the principal thing fignifled and typified
by
of the Chriflian Religion. 373
by it ; and the Types and Figures of himfelf
could not be Inftitured by himfelf in Perfon >
for then they would have been infignificant,
and there could have been no ufe or occafion
for thern. But the mod Excellent and Divine
Inftitution was referv'd for his Appointment,
to which all the reft was but preparatory.
The Law was added becaufe of Tranfgrejjlons,
till the Seed fhould come, to whom the Promife
was made, Gal. iii. 19.
After the Revelation, of God's Will and Com-
mandments had thro' the great neglect and
vvickednefs of Mankind become ineffectual,
God fent all his Servants the Prophets daily ri-
fing up early and fending them ; an expreflion
letting forth his great care and watchfulnefs
over his People for their good, yet they heark-
ned not unto him, nor endin^d their ear, but
hardned their neck, Jer. vii. 25, 26. To Cure
* this ftrange ftubbornnefs, and their pronenefs
to Idolatry, God fent this People into Captivi-
ty for Seventy years; which wrought fo tho-
rough a Reformation in them, that they were
never afterwards given to Idolatry, but en-
• ' dur'd all extremities of Torments rather than
they would be brought to any compliance
with the Heathen Worfhip ; and therefore there
could be no longer fuch neceflity that the Ce-
remonial Law mould be continu'd to them to
keep them from the Worlhip of Idols : But in
other refpects their Provocations were {till very
great. And as the Lord in the Parable firft:
B b 3 fent
074 the Reafonablenefs and Certainty
fent his Servants, and lad of all his Son, fay-
ing, they will reverence my Son ; and thereby
left thofe wicked Men without excufe, and
manifefted the Juftice of his Vengeance upon
the Murtherers of his own Son. So God firfl
fent his Prophets, and when the Jews who had
been train'd in the knowledge and worfhip of
him, and were to conveigh it to other Na-
tions, .would not be reclaim'd by them, but
revil'd and deftroy'd them, and then fet up
their own Traditions in oppofition to their
Doctrines ; he fends hisfeeloved Son before he
would utterly take away their City and Nation,
atid effected that by the death of his Son,
whom they Crucified, which the experience
of fo many Ages had fhewn could be effected
no other way.
God reveafd himfelf at funclry times and in
divers manners, and in his Infinite Wifdom pro-
portioned the. ways and meafure of his Revela- «
tions to the capacities and the necetfities of
the feveral Ages, in which they were made,
till at lait he hath fpoken unto us ly his Son,
Heb. i. i, 2. When we were Children we were in
hondage under the Elements of the World: but
when the fulnefs of the time was come, God fent
forth his Son, made of a Woman, made under the
Law, Gal. iv. 3, 4.
z. The Reception of Chrift and his Gofpel
in the World would have been much more dif-
ficult, if fo many Prophets in fo many feveral
Ages had not foretold his coming. Our Sa-
viour
of the Chriftian Religion. 375
viour himfelf and his Apbftles after him appeal
to Mofes and the Prophets for the truth of their
Doctrine ; this was the great Argument which
they us'd to the Jews in Confirmation even of
their Miracles themfelves, they prov'd that
the Prophets had foretold that Chrift mould
come . at that very time when he came, and
that he lliould work thofe Miracles which he
wrought, and mould empower his Difciples to
do the like: his Death and Refurre&ion,
and A/cenfion , and the defcent of the
Holy Ghofl were all Prophefied of ; and Pro-
phecies thus foretelling the Miracles, and Mi-
racles fullfillfng the Prophecies, and both mu-
tually confirming and fupporting each other
afforded all the Evidence that could be given ;
for Prophecies and Miracles are all the ways
by which God can be fuppofed to reveal him-
lelf to Mankind. And therefore thoufands of
the Jews were convinc'd out of the Scriptures
that Jefus is the Chrift, and were Converted
to the Chriftian Faith. And the Prophecies
concerning the Mejftah are ftill an unanfwer-
able Argument in vindication of our Religion ;
which Argument we mull: have wanted, if our
ble(Ted Saviour had come fo much fooner, as
not to have been Prophefied of fo many Ages
beforehand. And thofe who reject the Gofpel
now, would have thought they had had much
more Reafon on their tide than they can now
pretend to have ; for there had then been fo
much lefs means for their Conviction. So
Bb 4 that
3/5 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
that the coming of our Saviour was deferr'd to
give the greater Evidence, and the fuller con-
viction of his being the Chrift.
It would have been hard to believe that the
Son of God mould come into the World with
little or no notice given of it beforehand, and
few or no Prophets fent to foretell his copiing,
and prepare his way. But. when he had been
fo long before Prophefy'd of, even from the
beginning of the World, thro' the feveral Ages
of it, when there had been a general expecta-
tion of the Mejfiah to be born, and the Time
and Place, and Tribe and Family and Perfon
of whom he was to be born, by degrees, and
at feveral times had been foretold; when Mens
hopes and defires to fee him were thus from
Age to Age awakened and alarmed, this was a
Solemnity worthy to introduce and attend the
Son of God into the World, and a Method
which would prove a (landing Evidence of his
being come into it.
3 . The time of Chrift's coming may depend
upon things which we are uncapable of know-
ing. For it may depend upon the duration of
the World, and it is impolfrble for any Man to
know how long that mall be. The Scripture
fpeaks of the times of the Gofpel under the
Phrafe of the A?/? Days,but this is to be under-
ftood in relation not to the continuance of the
World, but to the Chriftian Difpenfation,
which is the lafl means of Salvation that God
■ill vouchfafe to Mankind, and with regard
to
of the Chriflian Religion. 377
to the Jewzjb Church and Government, which
was juil then at an end, as I fhall fhew in the
aext Chapter.
Now if the World may continue as long un-
der the difpenfation of the Gofpel as it had
done before it (and no Man can tell but it
may) we fhall find little caufe to wonder that
Chrifl was not fooner born into the World.
For we find that the Faith and Zeal of Chri-
flians decays, as we are at a farther diflance of
.time from the Incarnation of our Saviour, and
the firfl propagation of his Gofpel, and the
length of the time it felf proves a temptation
to lome to disbelieve it; for men are apt to
give left credit to what . happened long ago,
and to think themfelves lefs concern'd in it.
If therefore Chrifl had been born at the be-
ginning of the World, how many more pre-
tences would thofe Men have feigned to them-
felves for their Infidelity, who are now fo
prone to unbelief, and fo unwilling to be
Chriftians ?
• Men are tempted to fufpe£l that there is
fomething of obfcurity and uncertainty in all
things long fincepaft; and if Chrifl had been
born a thoufand or two thoufand years fooner,
thofe who now think he came too late, would
then have cavilled that he came too foon, and
that it was too long ago to be believed, and
had happened in a dark and fabulous Age.
And therefore it feems that Chrifl came in the
very feafon and centre of time ; that as the
former
378 The Reajonablenefs and Certainty
former Ages' were not fo remote as not to be
capable of all the benefits of his Death and
Pailion to be in due time accomplifh'd ,• fo the
lall Ages of the World may have no pretence
to queftion the truth of the Chriftian Religion
upon any account of the long diftance of time
fince the Death of our Saviour and his Apo-
flles. This may be the Cafe for ought any
Man can tell, or many other Reafons there
might be much better and more important
than this, to deferr the Incarnation of our Sa#*^
viour; and therefore it is an ablurd thing to
raife Objections about it. Many Reafon there
might be for it, which we are uncapable of
knowing ; and it is fufflcient for us to know,
that it was in the fulnefs of time , and that this,
time was the mofr. proper and expedient, -and
therefore was the time appointed and determi-
ned by God from all Eternity.
4. God had by the various Methods of his
Providence given fuch flgnal opportunities to
the Gentiles to become acquainted with the
Scriptures of the Old Teftament, as did"
mightfy prepare them for the acknowledgment
of Chrift at his coming into the YVorld. All
the DifpenLitions of the Divine Providence
from the Beginning, had been as fo many fe-
veral preparations to the Birth of Chrift, God
chofe Abraham to be the Father of a peculiar
People ; and when that People had been by the
conftant manifeftation of a miraculous Provi-
dence preferv'd, and by their Laws and Cere-
monies
of the Cbrifiian Religion. 379
monies diftinguifhed from all other People,
they were driven into Captivity, as well in
mercy to other Nations, as by God's juft Judg-
ment upon them for their Sins, that by this
means the Gentiles might be inftructed in the
Worlhip of the true God, and the Prophecies
concerning Chrift might become divulged, and
all Nations might be in a readinefs to acknow-
ledge and receive him who was to be the de-
fire of all Nations, and the joy of all People.
Firft, the Ten Tribes were by Shalmanefer car-
' ried away Captive, and then the two remain-
ing Tribes by Nebuchadnezzar ; and Cyrus was
by Name appointed to reftore them. Alex-
anders Conquefts made yet way for a farther
reception of the Prophecies, which were the
moft conliderable about the time of the Capti-
vity. And befides the Prophecy of 'Balaam, by
which the Wife Men were directed to find out
Chrift by the guidance of a Star, thofe of
ffaiah, and Jeremiah, and Daniel, muft be
Well known in the Eaft. The Bible had been
about three hundred years before our Saviour's
Birtn, at the Command of a Heathen Prince
Tranflated into the Greek Tongue, which was
by the Victories of Alexander become the mofl
known Language in the World. And we read
of no Revolution of Empires, no Blefling, no
Affliction which befell the Jews, but it con-
tributed in a remarkable manner to raifean ex-
pectation of Chrift, and to prepare for his
Coming.
It
g8o The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
It is certain, that at the time of his Birth,
there was among the Jews an Univerfal expe-
ctation of the Mefliah, and that it was a re-
ceiv'd Opinion irt that Age all over the Eaft,
that a great Prince lhould arife out of Judea,
this appears both from the Scriptures, and
<:OSueton. from (z) Heathen Writers; the Wife Men
inv<fp*f-m came to enquire after him, and Herod's Jea-
%$. iib.v! ^ou^e proceeded to the utmoft Rage and Cru-
elty, and could not have failed of luccefs, if it
had been againft any but the true MeJJiah^/hom
God dicl by an immediate Revelation deliver"
out of his hands. . All the World llood in ex-
pectation of foms extraordinary Perlon, and
it was no unvvellcome piece of Flattery to one
of the Roman Emperors not long after, to have
it reported, that he was the Prince fpoken of
and expe&ed in the Eaft, but it was efteemed
his Glory and his Happinefs to be thought the
King that was to arife amongft a defpifed and
hated People. The expectation of Chrift was
fo great, that he could not lie conceafd in that
obicure and mean Condition, but was adored
in a Manger, and receiv'd more than Koyal
Honours from the remoteft parts of the Earth.
And in this refpect it was the fulnefs of time,
or the mod convenient and proper time for
Chrift to appear, becaufe the Divine Provi-
dence had wonderfully difpoled and prepared
the World for the expectation of him.
5". The particular temper and difpofition of
the Age in which our Saviour was born, made
it
of the Chriftian Religion, ; 38
it the mofl fitting and proper Age for him to be
born in ; for there were feveral things peculiar
to that Age, which very much conduce to the
proof of the certainty of his Religion. That
Age was fo remarkable, and the Hiftory of it
has been delivered down to us by fo many
eminent Writers, that it is more fludied, and
generally better known than any Age of the
World befides ; and it was fit that a thing of
this nature and confequence fhould come to
pafs in fuch an Age, that it might be fully en-
quired into, in any Age afterwards, and that
no diflance of time might caufe fuch doubts
concerning it, as fhould ever render it the
lefs certain to any, whoare willing to acquaint
themfelves with the truth of it.
If it had been an Impoflure, this furely had
been the mod 'unlikely time of any for it to
fucceed. No Prince could be more jealous
than Herod, who was fo enraged at the Report
of the Birth of Chrift, that he too plainly
lhew'd how much he credited it. And no Age
perhaps fince the Creation could be more un-
likely to have a Cheat put upon it than this;
in which Peace and Learning and all Polite
Arts flourifh'd, which refine Men's Under-
Handings, and make them the moll unfit and
difficult to be impofed upon. Policy was in
its higheft perfection in the Courts of Auguftus
and Tiberius, which have been efieemed the
greatefl Patterns of it ever fince ; the Scribes
and Pharijees were in great Power and Autho-
rity
382 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
rity at Jemfalem, who were a fubtle Genera-
tion of Men, and the word Enemies any one
could have to deal withall. Vice, which was
likely to give the greateft hindrance to a holy
Religion, was the fafhion of the times, and
that Empire was never fo abandoned to wick-
ednefs, as at the firft propagation of the Go-
fpel. As Men were then moft able to difcover
any Impofture,fo they mud have been moft un-
willing to find the ChriftianReligion true,which
puts fuch a check to all Licentioufnefs, and to
their beloved and long accuftomed Vices.
Vice would be fure to make a ftrong defence,
and an eager Plea, and nothing could be diffi-
cult for it to difcover, when it had fuch a
number of fuch fubtle and devoted Advocates.
In this Conjuncture of time the Saviour of
the World appears, and he appears in a mean
and low Condition, defpiled by his own Peo-
ple, who foon became as much defpifed them-
felves by all the World befides. The Prince
of Peace is Born in a time of fetled and Uni-
verfal Peace, when Men had moll leifure
and opportunity to examine and confider
things ; and when by the Eftablifhment of the
Roman Empire under Augujlus in its full power
and extent, there was an open and free Cor-
refpondence between all Nations, and the
Apoftlcs and their Followers by this means
might find a like admittance to preach the
Goipel in all Countries, but to be alike hated
and perfecuted in all parts of the World. The
Religion
of the Cbrijiian Religion. 383
Religion of Chrift was not to make advantage
of any. Troubles and Confufions in the Empire,
as that of Mahomet afterwards did, but to re-
commend it felf by its own worth and efficacy
to the mod ierious and impartial Minds ; and
under all thefe difadvantages it foon made its
way into the Emperor's Court, where Craft
and Luxury, and every thing that is moll:
contrary to the purity and fimplicity of the
Gofpel reigned. St. Paul had his Profelytes in
C&far's Houjboldy and his Bonds in Chrift were
manifeji in all the Palace, and in all other places
at Rome, Phil. i. 13. iv. 22. The truth of
the Gofpel approved itfelf to the mod prejudi-
ced Judgments, it flood all the Trials, and
Conquer'd all Oppofition, that Wit and
Learning, and Vice it felf could make. For
by the leave of the Atheifts and Deifts of our
own Age, the Chriftian Religion found the
fubtilefl and mod dangerous Adverfaries at its
ffrfl propagation. The Epicureans and the
Stoicks encountred St. Paul at Athens, and thefe
laft efpecially were inferiour to no other Sed:
of Philofophers ; either for their obftinacy in
adhering to their own Opinions, or for their
Art and Skill in Difputation. And it appears
from the feveral Apologies made afterwards
in vindication of our Religion, that all was at
the very firfl: alledged againft it, which can
with any pretence or colour be objected.
Thus was Chrift Born in the fulnels of time,,
when all the Prophecies concerning his coming
were
384 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
were fulfilled, and ' when the World was in
expectation of him, and had fuch general no-
tice of his coming ; in a time the moft unlike-
ly for an Impodure to pafs undifcover'd, and
therefore the mod feafonable for Truth to ma-
nifed it felf ; fince that mull: needs be truex
which neither Learning, nor Prejudice, nor
Vice, nor Intered could prove to be falfe.
The accomplifhment of Prophecies, and the
Converfion and Martyrdom of fuch numbers
of Men in fuch an Age, recommends the
Gofpel to us with all the advantage which any
Juncture of Time could give.
CHAP. XXII.
Of the lajl Days j and of the laft Day,
or the Day of Judgment.
BY the laft Days in the Scriptures mud
be meant either the lad Days of the
World, or the lad Days of the Jewijh State
and Government, or the Days of the Gofpel
Difpenfation; which are the lad Days in re-
aped: of the Means and Opportunities of Sal-
vation vouch fafed to Mankind.
I. The lad Days of the World are feldom
mention'd dire&ly, and in exprefs terms, but
under fuch Refemblances as were fit to repre-
fent them in the defcription of other Events.
For
of the Chriflian Religion. 285
For it was a known thing among 'the Jews,
that their whole Difpenfation being Typical,
whatever happened to them under their I aw
arid Government, mull afterwards be fulfilled
in a more eminent manner under the Oecono-
my and Difpenfation of the Meffias ; and there-
fore the la(i Days of jfcrufalem mud be Typi-
cal of the laft Days of* the World. For the
Deftruction of Jerufalem at the Gonclufion of
the Jewift Difpenfation was only a Type of
the final Definition of the World at the con-
fummation of all things, when Chrift mail de* ■
liver up th% Kingdom to God, even the Father,
1 Cor. xv. 24. For which Reafon our Saviour
makes ufe of fuch words, Matt. xxiv. as are
applicable to both of thefe events, and often-
times more fitly to the laft Judgment, that
after the Deftruclion of Jerufalem it might ap-
pear, that the reft remains ftill to be accom-
plifhed at the Day of Judgment. But there
are likewife fuch Expreflions ufed, as evidently
fhew that the Deftru&ion oLJerufalem is the
thing immediately defigned in the Prophecy.
This will appear, if we confider ieveral Verfes
of that Chapter. Then let them which he in
Judea, flee into the Mountains, ver. 16. 'and
that with the greateft haft ; for let him which is
on the houfe top not come down to take any thing
out of his houfe, v. 17. Neither let him which is
in the field, return hack to take his Cloaths, v. 1 8.
But the Condition of fuch would be very mife-
rable, who lhould be unfit for flight. And woe
C c unto
a %6 Tb* Keafonabknefs and Certainty
unto them 'that are with Child, and to them that
give fuck inthofe days, v. 19. But pray ye that
your flight be not in the Winter, neither tin the
Sabbath Day, v. 20. There will be no flying
from the general deftrudtion of the World, but
the Difciples are here warned to fly from the
deftruclion of Jerufakm, and efcape into the
Mountains, and they cfre commanded to pray
that their flight might be hundred neither by
the feafon of the year, nor by the Sabbath,
on which the Jews were permitted to travel
but a very little way. Which fuppofes that
the World was to lad after the Tribulation
there fpoken of; and that therefore the final
deftruttion of this material World is not the
thing there immediately meant. And except
thofe days jbould be Jhortned, there fhould no
Flejh be faved: but for. the Eletls fake thofe
days fhall be fhortned, v. 22. If this Defini-
tion ihould have raged long in that manner,
no Man of the Jews could have furvived it,
but it was to be fo abated and fo foon over,
that the converted Jews might be preferved
from it ; which Promife was very remarkably
and wonderfully fullfilled to the Chriftians at
the Siege otjerujalem, who made their efcape
into the Mountains, and retir'd to Telia. For
wherefoever the Carcafs is, there will the Eagles
be gathered together, ver. 28. which is a plain
allufion to the Roman Eagles, or the Standards
of their Armies. Immediately after the tribu-
• lation
of the Chrifiian Religion. 387
lation of thofe days {hall the Sun be darkned,
and the Moon {ball not give her light, and the
Stars /hall fall from Heaven, and the Powers of
the Heavens fhall be Jhaken, ver. 29. This was
in fome refpeft litterally fulfilled at the De-
finition of Jerufalem. But it is ufual with
the Prophets by thefe Figures to defcribe the
Deflru&ion of Nations, and the falfe Teach-
. ers are fly I'd by St. Jude, ver. 13. wandring
Stars, becaufe the true were as the Sun and
nYd Stars. Balaam Prophefy'd that a Star
fhould come out of Jacob, and a i Scepter
fhould rife out of Ifrael, Numb. xxiv. 1 7. and
that Impoflor in the time of Adrian, who pre-
tended to-be the Meffias called himfelf Barcho-
chebas, or the Son of a Star. So that by the (a)<^»-
darkning of the Sun and Moon, and the fall- ^^:
• ing of the Stars from Heaven, by an ufual Me- tur (m^
taphor, was meant the failing of the Jewijh as) de
State and Government. This is agreeable to Gentts
what 00 Maimonides relates of the form of J,^§-
Speech ufual with the Arabians, when they one,vel de
would exprefs any great Calamity, into which Pofuli
any Man was fallen. Verily I fay unto you, allCMi^s, ,
this generation fhall not pafs 'till all thefe things terj^ %**t
be fulfilled; that is, 'till they be accomplifh'd Stellas ce*
cidijje,
ccelos interline, & edntremifcere , folem obtenebratum, t err am
v aft at am & commotam ejje, aliifq\ mult Is Jimilibus locutionibus
Par aboil cis utitur ; Jicut apud Arabes de eo^ cm fingulare
aliquod infortunium accidit, dicitur, quod caelum ipfius in t err am
converfum (ity vel fuper t err am ems ceciderit. Maimon. More Ne-
voch, Part. 2. c. 29. Confuevit enim de regno all quo loqui ac Ji effet
mundus peculiarity hoc <r/?, caelum & terra, lb.
C c 2 in
388 The Reafonableneff and Certainty
in their firft and immediate fenfe in the De-
struction of Jerufalem, which was deftroy'd
forty years alter.
II. Thefe were therefore properly the lafl
days of the City and Government of the Jews,
(fc)Lightf. wno were wont to call the (J?) coming of the
the'it'.T. Meffias the New Creation, according to the
§. ix. Prophet, Ifa. lxv. 17. lxvi. 2.2. and the world
to come; whereupon in their account, the
time immediately foregoing muft be the lad
days of the former World. And thus the Apo-
ftle fpfeaks, they are written for our Admonition
upon whom the ends of the world are corns,
1 Cor. x. 11. which maybe as truly rendred,
upon whom the ends of the Times or Ages
are come ; for fo the word there ufed Signi-
fies. The World had now continued about
four thoufand years, and this was the end or
conclufion of the Ages, when a new period of
time was to begin. And the fame Apoftle
fhewing, that Chrift is not like the Jewifh
High-Priefts, for then muft he often have fujfe red,
fince the foundation of the World, adds, but now
once in the end of the World hath he appeared to
put away fin by the facrifice ofhimfelf, Heb. ix. 26.
where, tho' in our Translation the word World
be twice ufed, yet in the Original it is expreft
by two different words, the firft Signifying the
vifible and material World, but the latter Sig-
nifying Ages, to teach us that Chrifl appeared
to fufter tor us in the end of the Ages, not in
the end of this material World. For the Apo-
ftfe
of the Chrijiian Religion. 389
file would have ufed the fame word, if he had
meant the fame thing in both places, and
would never have made lb fudden a change of
words to no purpofe. *
' The lad Days, which the Prophet Joel
foretold, and for which he is quoted by St. Pe-
ter, Afts ii. 16. are the laft days of the Jewijh
State and Government, which was fhortly to
receive its final period ; the Jewifh Law and
Power was then near its end, and the days or
times juft before its conclufion and ultimate
period was the (pace granted the Jews for their
Converfion, before the deftru&ion of their
City and Nation ; and thefe were the laft days
of their difpenfation, and the laft opportunity
that was to be afforded them, as a diftinct and
peculiar People.
III. The Scripture fpeaks of the times of the
Gofpel as the laft days ,• which is to be under-
ftood, not with refpecT: to the duration of
time, but to the difpenfation of the Gofpel ;
k is the laft difpenfation which God will
vouchfafe to Mankind, the laft means and op-
portunity of Salvation which will be granted
to the World, and it is Prophecy 'd of under
the Character of the laft days, Ifa. ii. 2.
Micabiv. 1, 2. For the opportunity and time
allotted for the means of Salvation, is wont to
be ftiled the day of Salvation. If thou hadfi
known 1 even thou at leaft in this thy day, the
things which he long unto thy peace, but now they
are hid from thine eyes, Luke xix. 42. To day
Cc3 */
gpo The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts,
Hcb. iii. 7, 15. iv. 7. For he faith, I have
heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of
Salvation have I fuccoured thee ; behold now is
the accepted time, behold now is the day of Sal-
vation, 2 Cor. vl. 2. Ifa. xlix. 8. So that by
Day is fignified Seafon or Opportunity in the
Language of Scripture, .as Night is put to fig-
nifie the contrary. / mufi work the works of
him that fent me, while it is day, the Night
cometh, when no man can work, Job. ix. 4.
The Scriptures herein confider the continu-
ance and duration of the World no othervvife
than with relation to the difpenfations which
God has been pleas'd to afford Men in order to
their Salvation, and in this refpect the time
under the Gofpel is the laft days, tho' it be of
never fo long duration, becaufe the Gofpel is
the laft difpenfation-. The laft Age of the
World is the Age under the Gofpel, whether
it be longer or Shorter than the reft, and the
whole duration of this Age is ftyled the laft
Days, ftnee by Days is not to be underftood
the length or continuance of any 'certain time,
but the difpenfation of the Gofpel, and the
time under the Gofpel is the laft Days ; not be-
caufe the World then began to draw towards
its period or diflblution, but becaufe the Go-
fpel offers us the laft opportunity of Salvation,
and is the conclufion and period, and the final
ccniummation of the grace and goodnefs of
God extended towards Mankind. The Gofpel
being
ef the Chrifiian Religion. gpi
being the lad means of Salvation offend to
Mankind, the whole time under it is there-
fore fometimes ftiled the lafl Days, the laft di-
ftinction of Times, the laft Seafon and Oppor-
tunity to be expected.
IV. The Day of Judgment being purpofely
cbnceafd both from Men and Angels to keep
us in a continual watchfulnefs and expectation
of it, the Apoftle St. Paul fpeaks of it, as that
which as to the time of it is uncertain, and
therefore is at all times to be expected.
And this gave occasion to fome to miftake
his meaning, tho there is nothing in his
words which implies that the Day of Judg-
ment was then approaching. For this we fay
unto you by the word of the Lord, thai we which
are alive, and remain unto the coming of the
Lord, fhall not prevent them which are ajleep.
Then we which are alive and remain, jhall be
caught up together with them in the Clouds, to
meet the Lord in the air ; and fo fhall we ever
be with the Lord, i Thef. iv. 15, 17. yiju&s
oT ^&vn<;, oi Tri&iA&nrQ^vQi, we the living,
the remaining, that is the faithful which mall
then be alive and remain upon the Earth.
St. Paul fpeaks of the Faithful here 'under a
twofold denomination, viz. of the Dead and
the Living, and fpeaking of the Living he
ufes the firft Perfon Plural, as being himfelf
yet in the number of the Living ; not that
he mould be of that number at the Day of
Judgment
Cc 4 Thus
3p2 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
, . _, „. . L, „ TT Thus frequent (c) Ex-
(V) Tolht animos (Tullus Ho- „ — ~i „ i * r j
mi^iMafiWelm^jjet, tfes ar?Ples ^t0 be found>
»W* w/w, metus hoflibus, Flor. where Hiltorians Rela-
fib. i. c.3. — Stipendlariam nobis ting matters of Fa6t
J^feMW |Wt (Scipio Africa. which happened long
nus.) Htfpamam lib- 11. c 1 7. O*- , r , rr — . »
nV«» £&*», 7? tvr4 W«mw before their own Times,
ito/cere, nosfecimus, lib. iii. c 7. u(e the expreflions of we
and <w; we Fought,
our Army Conquerd ; that is, the People of
which I am now a Member, or the Army of
this People. We ( the Englijh ) Conquer'd
Frame m the Reign of King Henry V. and if
this had been Prophefy'd of, it might have
•been faid, we fhall Conquer, ' &c. Our Sa-
viour fpeaking to the Jews, fays Mofes, gave
you not that bread from Heaven, when they
had told him before, our Fathers did eat Man-
na in the Defart, Joh. vi. $1, 32. And it
might as well have been faid to the Patri-
archs you fhall eat manna in the Wildernefs,
as to the Jews of our Saviour's time, you did
eat it.
A Prophet "foretelling things to come to
pafs after his own death, might fay, We fhall
do fo and fo, that is, thofe of this Nation and
People fhall do it to which I belong ; and
therefore reckon my lelf in the Number, tho*
i can have no ihare in the A&ion, nor live to
fee it. In the fame manner St. Paul fays, we
/hall not alljleep, hut we fhall all he changed,
1 Cor. xv. 51. that is, we who are not
yet in the number of the Dead, but are to
be
of the Chriflian Religion. opj
be reckoned amongft the prefent and future
Living. As when he writes to the Ephefiansy ,
among whom alfo we all had our conversation in
times pafl, in the lufls of our fiejh, fulfilling the
de fires of the fle(h and of the mind, and were by
Nature the Children of wrath, even as others,
Eph. ii. 3. it is Paraphras'd by Dr. Hammond
thus, among who we of the Gentile Church of
Rome, from whence I write ', formerly lived, &c.
It is certain St. Paul expe&ed his own death,
2 Tim. iv. 6. but it is ufual with him to fpeak
in his own perfon by a Figure, and fometimes
even when he mentions himfelf by Name,
1 Cor. iv. 6. and he exprefly declares that he
dicj neither by word nor letter figniffe that the
Day of Chrift was at hand, 2 Thef. ii. 2.
V. The Day of Judgment is defcrib'd with
fo much Solemnity, and fo many Particulars,
that it may feem imporlible for them ail to be
difpatched in the compafs not only of one but
of many Days. But (<?/) the Jews, from ^ Med<*
whom our Saviour and his Apoflles took the Epift. xx.'
expreflion of the Day of Judgment, underdood
by it a Time of many years continuance, and
fometimes the term even of a thoufand years.
And by Day in the Language of the Scriptures
is to be underflood Seafon, or any period and
diftinction of time with refpeel: to iome parti-
cular thing or occafion ; as thefe are the Gene-
rations of the Heavens, and oj the Earth, when
they were Created, in the day that the Lord God
made the Earth and the Heavens , Gen. ii. 4.
that
3 p a. The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
that is in the Time, confiding of fix days ;
the day of temptation in the Wilder nefs was
forty years, Heb. iii. 8,9. Nay St. Peter iifes
it to exprefs Eternal Duration, to him he Glory,
fays he, both now and for ever, which in the
Original is, both now, and to the day of Eter-
nity, 2 Pet. iii. 1 8. Day is us'd for Judgment
(OGror. itfelf, 1 Cor. iv. 3. and (e) fo the Jews under-
jjf * Cat' flood Days to be meant, Job xxiv. 1. In our
Language Days-man fignifles Judge or Umpire,
Job ix. 33. and Diem dicere was the Law-term
amongft the Romans for the Summons to a
Tryal, but it doth not follow from thence,
that the Caufe mufl needs have been decided
(nitaquecumego diem in Sicilian UP°n, the fame ?*Y>
inquirendt perexiguam poftutlflem, invent WhlCll Was appointed
iftey qui fibi in Acbaiam biduo breviotem fop j^g hearing it. ( e )
diem toftulam : nonut is idem conficeret rr> n t r\ • i ■ c n.
diligent*, & induftrU fud, quod ego Tully by Day in his firft
meo labore & vigihis confecutus jum. Et- Oration again ft Verres,
enimille Achaicus inquifuor, ne Brundi- ^^^ -,-he fmrP nf ««.
■fiumquidemfervenit. Ego SicMam to- "Beans tne lpaCC OT at
tam quinquaginta dtebus Jic obij, «r om- lealt riity Days. 1 here
mum populoium, privaiorumque Htteras [s n0 Realon then to
^ia^cognofcerem^c. in Wcr.A^.L ^^ ^ ^ ^
Judgment mufl: be confined to one or more
Days; but it will take upas much time as the
•vSolemnity of the Proceedings require.
m'PIunc diem Judicii ultimum diem dicimus^
id eft, noviffimum Tempus. Nam per quot dies
hoc judicium tendatur, incertum eft : fed fcrip-
turarum more fanftarum diem poni folere pro
tempore, nemo qui literas illas quamlibet neg-
ligent er legerity tiefcit. Aug. de Civ it. Dei,
Jib. xx. c.i. CHAP.
of the Cbrijiian Religion. gp5
C H A P. XXIII.
Of Sacraments.
THO* the Jewifb Law was very requi-
fite at that time, and for that People,
when it was in force, and the wifeft and bell
Inflitution that could have been, yet it was in-
deed a yoke, and fuch a yoke as was burthen-
fome and not to have been born, but in fure
hopes and expectation of better things to
come. And at the approach of the Son of
Righteoufnefs thefe fhadows vanifhed, and the
Types having attained their end and accom-
plifhment, were laid afide ; and in their room
Chrift has Inftituted as few Rites as it was
poflible ; only the two Sacraments ; one for
our Initiation, and firfl Reception ; and the
other for our Re-eftablifhment and Confirma-
tion in that Covenant, which he has been
pleas'd to make with us. And yet even thefe
are thought too many by lbme, who as if
they were all Soul and Spirit without Body,*
are only for a Mental and Spiritual Worfhip.
To vindicate therefore the Inftitution and ufe
• of Sacraments, I ftiall Firfl, Confider the Na-
ture and Defign of Sacraments in General ;
Secondly, I mall fhew how fully the two Sa-
craments of Baptifm and the Lord's Supper
anfwer the End and Defign of the Inftitution
of Sacraments.
I. I will
396 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
I. t will enquire into the Nature and De-
fign of Sacraments in General. Sacraments
may be confider'd, either, i. as outward and
vifible Signs of our entrance into Covenant
with God, or of our renewing our Covenant
with him. Or, z. As Pledges of God's Grace
and Favour towards us. Or, 3. As the Means
and Inftruments, whereby he is pleas'd to con-
vey into our Souls the bleiled Influences of
his Holy Spirit. Or, laftly, they may be
confider'd as vifible Rites, whereby we are ad-
mitted into the vifible Society of Chrift's
Church, or profefs our Communion with it.
And in all thefe refpedts it will appear, how
beneficial and requiiite the Inftitution of Sa-
craments is, and how fitting it is that God
in his Dilpenfations with Men mould appoint
fomething outward and vifible to be done, or
received by them.'
I. Ceremonies and -Rites of Initiation and
of Worfliip have been Inftituted in all Reli-
gions, which is Evidence fufficient, that the
Nature of Man requires them, and that our
.Worfliip cannot be wholly Mental and Spiri-
tual. And God is pleas'd in his Dealings with
Mankind, to condefcend to their Capacities,
to afcribe to himfelf their Paflions, to allude
jto their Cuftoms, and to make ufe of fuch
1 Means and Methods as Men are accuftomed
£0 in their Dealings with one another. He
beft underilands Humane Nature, and knows
all the difpofitions and tendencies of it ; be
bmvetb
of the Chrijlian K eligion. 397
kncvcetb our frame, he rememhretb that we %are
duft, Pf. ciii. 14. He considers that we are
Flefh as well as Spirit, he fully comprehends
the ftricl: Union between the Soul and the Bo-
dy, and the caufe and manner of it, and how
great influence the one hath upon the other in.
their feveral Operations ; he planted in us all
our Powers and Faculties, and (gqs all their
Motions and Inclinations, the fecret Springs of
Action and Paflion, and has accordingly fitted
and proportioned the Inflitution of his Laws
and Ordinances.
We fee among Men, that they are not con-
tent only to underiland one anothers Meaning,
or.to exprefs their Minds in Words, tho* they
be the moll folemn and fignificant ; but are
wont to ufe fome Ceremony and Solemnity of
Action and Qrcumftances in matters of great
Importance ; becaufe this makes greater im-
preilion upon the Mind, and lays upon it a
more forcible and lading engagement by ta-
king in theSenfesand Pailions, as Parties con-
cerned with it ; and this is by experience found
to have the beft effect to all the ends and pur-
pofes of Agreement and Obligation between
Men. Oaths themfelves are not found to be
Co fecure to be rely'd upon, when they are
only pronounc'd, as when they are taken with
fuch Circumftances of words and gefture, as
may create an awe and reverence in thole
who take them. For the manner and circum-
flances in which any action is done, raife and
fix
gp8 The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
fix the Attention, and exprels the Mind "and
Defign of the Doer, and are better retain'd in
the Memory, and work more upon the Will
and AfFe&ions, than the Adtion of itfelf can
do. This Orators very well underftand ; for
the Art of Rhetorick is almoft nothing elfe but
askilfull management of the circumftances of
actions to the advantage of a Caufe. And
Philofophy informs us, that the evil or good-
nefs of Actions depends chiefly upon their
Circumftances ; from whence we learn what
the intention of the Mind is, and to what de-
gree of Refolution it came in the performance
of any Action. If an Action be performed at
a folemn time and place, in the prefence of
Witnefles met together for that very purpofe,
upon great deliberation ; with fuch words and
geftures as are very figniflcant .to exprefs our
lull Defign and Intention ; all thefe Circum-
ftances confider'd make it much more our own
proper Adt and Deed than if it were done
without them, tho' the Intention were the
fame. For what we declare before others to
be our mind and purpofe to do or undertake,
we cannot but think our felves bound to un-
der more obligations than if we barely defign'd
it, or promis'd it only to the Perfons con-
cern'd ; becaufe the defign of declaring it is to
lay upon our (elves a farther obligation to per-
form it, and to call others as Witnefles againft
us, if we'neglecT: the performance of it; and
fince our Refolution may be declar'd as well
by
of the Chrifiian Religion. 399
by Actions as by Words ; he that exprefies
his Resolution both thefe ways, ihews a far-
ther defign to oblige himfelf, than if he fliould
only ufe words to exprefs it ; and if the Cir-
cumftances of Actions be ftated, and folemn
and figniflcant, then all the ways and means
concurr, by which it is poflible for Men to
declare and exprefs their Minds in any Cafe,
and to oblige themfelves to the performance of
any Covenant.
Now Sacraments are the Seals of the Cove-
nant between God and Man, and when God is
pleas'd to receive Men into Covenant with
himfelf, it is requifite that Men mould not
barely give their aflent to the Terms and Con-
ditions of it, and declare that they will un-
dertake them ; but it is farther neceflary that
this mould be done with all the* Solemnity of
Words and Actions that may engage *them to
the performance of it, and render them inex-
cufable if they tranfgrefs it ; it is fitting it
mould be entred into, and renewed in the pre-
fence of Witnefles, that the Words mould be
Solemn, and the Actions Significant, and that
nothing fliould be wanting, which may te-
flifie the Sincerity, and fecure the Fidelity of
the Undertakers. For if Covenants between
Man and Man be made with all the formality
of Witnefles, and Hands and Seals, and Deli-
very in folemn and exprefs words; if Men
know themfelves too well to trull: one another
without all this Solemnity, it may well be
^ expected
40 o The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
expected, that when God is pleas'd to permit
them to enter into Covenant with himfelf, he
fhould not receive them under lefs Obligations
of Caution and Security for their Integrity,
than Men are wont toufe amongfl themlelves.
For every breach of Covenant with him, is
infinitely more affronting and finfut than any
breach of Covenant with Man can be ; and
therefore God, who will not be mocked, has
appointed the moil effectual Means to fecure
his Laws from contempt ; he knows the de-
ceitfulnefs of Man's heart, how perverfe and
Stubborn -it is, efpecially in things of fuch a
Nature as thefe are of, to which Men are obli-
ged by that Promife and Vow that they are
required to make to him ; and that all the Re-
straints and all the Remembrances which
Words or Actions can afford, are little enough
to keep Men -in any tolerable meafure to their
Duty.
God was pleas'd to confirm his Promife to
Abraham with an Oath ,* and therein fhew'd
himfelf willing to, give all the aflurance that
the mod Incredulous Man can defire, of the
fix'd and unalterable iledfaftnefs of his purpofe,
and the Immutability of his Coumil, that we
wight have aflrong Qonfolation, Heb. vi. 17, 1 8.
And when God himfelf is pleas'd fo far tocon-
defcend for our comfort and fatisfaction, it is
moft reafonable that he mould oblige us to
perform our part of the Covenant, by all the .
ways that may put us in remembrance of our
Duty,
of the Chriflian Religion. a o i
Duty, and make us faithful and conftant in
the performance of it. And this could be ef-
fected1 by no better Means, than by outward
A£fcs and vifible Signs to teftifle and profefs in
the moft ferious and folemn manner, what
our inward Faith and Refolutions are. This is
that fort of fecurity which Men have of one
another, and when God makes a Covenant
with Men, he confiders them as Men ; that
is, he appoints fuch Solemnities of it as have
refpecl: to the Body as well as to the Soul ; he
doth not deal with us as with immaterial Spi-
rits, but as with Creatures confifling of Soul
and Body, and who little regard, and are little
afTetted with that, which. doth not forne way
concern the one as well as the other.
And it is ftrange to fee to what Extravagan-
cies thofe have proceeded, who have fet up
for a purely Spiritual Worftiip without any
thing Sacramental for a vifible Sign in it. For
not to mention the Pretenfions of our Enthu-
fiafls, who by decrying the ufe and neceffity
of Sacraments, have made Religion nothing
but an empty and uncertain Name amongft
them. Prophyry, who was a Man of Study
and Learning, after he had Apoftatiz'd from
the Chriflian Religion, upon a ridiculous Oc-
cafion, as Hiftory relates it, was aihamed to
return to the Heathen Idolatry, which after
the appearance of Ghriftianity in the World,
foon became too notoriouily abfurd and abo-
minable for any Man pretend iDg fo much to
D d Reafon
-..-
402 The Keafonabkmfs and Certainty
Reafort and good Senfe to own it ; but lie pla-
ced all Divine Worihip in Mental Prayer, and
fo iar rejected all outward and Bodily Wdrfhip,
(g)Porpbyr. (g) that he pretended the Prayers of Men
fttoent uerc P°^ute<^ an^ defiled by any thing of that
Ub.2.%.^. Nature, and rendred unacceptable to the De-
ity, and that they never were diffidently pure
and perfect, it they were exprefs'd by the .
Voice, but were then in their highefl degree
of Perfection} when they were all Contem-
plation, and Rapture,* and Extafie. And the
(hjErfeb. very fame Notions were taught by (£) Apol-
Evang.1- fortius Tyanaus, and have been revived of late
Hb.iv.c. by fueh as undervalue all outward Ordinances,
l?' which may be a Warning to others, and an
Evidence of the Divine VVifdom in appointing
Sacraments as outward and vifible Signs of
our Covenant and Communion with God.
2. As thefe outward Signs ferve to raife our
Attention and fix our Minds, and to put us
in Remembrance, that Heaven and Earth. An-
gels and Men are Witnefles againft us, if wc
prove treacherous and unfaithful in this Co-
venant ; fo they are as Tokens and Pledges to
% us of God's Love and Favour, and of his mer-
.riful and gracious Intentions towards us, in
taking us into Covenant with himfelf; they
give us fenfible and vifible AfTurances of that
Grace, which is in vifible and Spiritual. And
this feems but necefTary for Creatures that are
led fo much by Senfe, as we all are in this
Life, that God together with his Word and
Promifes
.1
of the Chriftian Religion. ^03
Promifes fhould befides appoint fomething,
which may be perceiv'd by our Bodily Senfes
in Token of thofe Bleffings which are beftow'd
upon the Soul, that what is no Object of
Senfe, may yet be reprefented and ilgnined by
fomething that is fenfible; to bring, as far as.
it is poflible, the moft. Divine and Heavenly
things down to our very Senfes ; which may
be a Sign and Token of prefent Grace and Fa-
vour, and a Pledge and Earneft of future Glo-
ry and Happinefs. And this is what is found
very ufeful and neceftary amongft Men, who
are better contented with fomething prefent
and in hand, tho' of little value, and infigni-
'ficant in itfelf, as a Token and Pledge of what
is promifed and made over to them, than
they are with the greateft Promifes and Prote-
ctions without any thing as an Earneft to
confirm them; becaufe this is a Natural Evi-
dence, that they are indeed in Earnefl (as our
Englijb word exprefles it) and really intend
#what they fay, and it may be produced againft
them, if they mould fail of Performance.
Now what is inward and invifible is abfent as
to Senfe, and what is future has need of iome-
thing prefent to reprefent it to us : And God
who was pleafed to bind himfelf even by an
Oath for our farther Comfort anfpTruil in
him ; has been pleafed likewife, that he might
be wanting in nothing, which might help our
Infirmities and ailifl our Faith; he has been
pleafed in condefcention to the Condition and
D d z Frailty
404 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
Frailty of Humane Nature, to-appoint tifibte
Signs and Pledges of that which is Invifible,
and to give all the Aflurance to our very Sen-
ks that they are capable of, that all the
Promifes of his Spiritual Bleflings and Graces
fhall as certainly be fulfilled to us, as the out-
ward Signs and Pledges are appointed for us,
and duly received by us.
3. Sacraments are not only Signs and To-
kens of Spiritual Gifts and Graces, but they I
are ordained as Means and Inftruments of I
Grace and Salvation to us, that as the Body |
partakes in the Moral Actions of Vertue and
Vice, fo it might concur in the Religious Acts
ordained for our SanQihcation. For God,*
who has made us fo as to confift of Soul and
Body, and to have the Vital Union between
Soul and Body depend upon a fit Difpqfition of
the Body, and to be maintained by the Health
and Nourifhment of it, has been pleas'd to
appoint certain Bodily Actions as the Means
and Inftruments of our Spiritual Life, that the'
Soul might not even in this Cafe, where itfelf
is more immediately concern'd, be wholly in-
dependent of the Body ; but that fmce both
mud be either happy or miferable together in
the next Life, both might concurr in the way
and means ol Salvation in this; yet fo, as that
the Soul fliould be the firft and principal
Agent, and the Body mould act only in fub-
ordination and fubferviency to it in this, as it
doth in other Cafes; that as in Moral Actions
the
of the Chriftian Religion. 40 $
the Soul ads Vertuoufly or vicioufly by the
Body ; fo in Spiritual Adions the Soul might
receive Advantage and Benefit by Bodily Atts,
and be deprived of it upon the OmuTion or
Neglect of fuch Act's.
The Body without the Soul is not the Man,
nor the Soul without the Body, but both Soul
and Cody together, and the whole Man be*
conies dedicated and confecrated to God's Wor-
ihip and Service in the ufe of Adions per-
formed outwardly in the Body. And it is re-
quifite that the Body as well as the Soul fhould
be thus dedicated to God in Token of the Re-
furredion of the Body, and of that Happinefs
which it muft receive in Heaven, if the Soul
be happy. St. Paul exhorts the Corinthians to
glorifie God in their Body as well as in their
Spirit, 1 Gor. vi. 20. he tells them, that the
Body is not for Fornication, hut for the Lord,
and the Lord for the Body : know ye not, fays
he, that your Bodies are the memlers of Chrifl >
what > know ye not, that your Body is the temple
of the Holy Ghofl ? There have been thofe in
feveral Ages, who have made fuch high Pre-
tences to Spiritual Worfhip, that they would
allow the Body no part or mare in it; and
others from the great irregularity and cor-
ruption which they could not but obferve in
their Carnal Appetites, have concluded that
the Body was made not by God, but by a
wicked Being, and that the Soul only was
from God. Since therefore God is pleated to
D d 3 .regard
406 The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
regard our Bodies as Members ofChrift, and
Temples of the Holy Ghoft, it was requisite,
that in contradiction to thefe, and fuch like
Errors, they mould by fome Rite or Sign be
devoted to him, by which it might be decla-
red, that Chrifi is the Saviour of the Body,
Ephef. v. 13. and by which fuch Grace might
be communicated, as to^render it the Temple
and place ofRefidenceof the Holy Ghoft, fet
apart and dedicated to him, and inhabited by
him, that the whole Spirit and Soul and Body
may be preserved blamelefs unto the coming of our
Lord Jefus Chrifi, 1 Thef. v. 23. It is the
great and gracious Defign of God to fan&ifie
the whole Man, and therefore Chrift took
not only an Humane Soul, but Humane Flefli
likewife, to dignifie it in the Affumption, and
offer it upon the Crofs, and tranflate it into
Glory. And as his Incarnation fhews the
particular Regard he has for the Body as well
as for the Soul of Man, fo the whole Inftitu-
tion of the Gofpel hath relation to both.
4. Laflly, The Sacraments are Fcederal Rites |
of our Admiftion into the Ghurch, as into a
viable Society, and of our Union with it as
fuch. For we cannot be admitted'into a vifible
Society, nor communicate with it, but by vi-
fible and outward Ads, which mull be per-
formed in the Body.
So that whatever way we confider the Sa-
craments, either in refped: of God, or of our |
Mvqs, or of others, there is a neceilary ufe
and
of the Chriflian Religim. 407
and benefit from them, and evident Reafon
for their Inftitution. They are requifite as
Symbols of our entrance into Covenant with
God, or of the Renewing and Confirmation
of it, and of Dedicating both our Bodies and
Souls to his Honour and Service ; they are
Inftruments of his Graces, and Pledges of his
Promifes made to us by Covenant, and of the
Reward and Happinefs both of our Bodies and
Souls at the Kefurreclion ; and are vifible
Marks and Evidences of our Profeffion, as
Members of the Church, of our Admirlion in-
to it, and our Communion with it.
II. The Sacraments of Baptifm and the
Lord's Supper fully anfwer the End and De-
fign of the Inftitution of. Sacraments. After
the coming of Chrift, and the fulfilling of the
Ceremonial Law by him, it was of no longer
j. ufe or continuance, the Gofpel being to intro-
duce a Spiritual Service, by teaching Men to
worjhip God in Spirit and in Truth : Yet there
was need of fbme external Ordinances or Sa-
craments, the Nature of Man, and the State
of this World requiring them ; but that they
might be as ftw as poflible, Chrift has ap-
pointed but two Sacraments as generally ne-
ceffary to Salvation, and thefe the fltteft and
moft expedient for the .benefit and wants of
Men.
1. As to Baptifm, the Reafons and Defigns
in the Inftitution of Sacraments are all vifible
in it. It is a very fignificant and apt Repre-
D d 4 lentation
4 .o8 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
fentation of the deanfing and purifying the
Soul from Sin, and in this Men of all Nations
and of all Religions feem to have been agreed.
For nothing was more frequent among the
Heathens than their Warnings and Purificati-
ons ; and tho* they attributed a great deal too
much to them, yet the fuperflitious Opinion
which they had of thefe outward Cleanfings,
could never have fo univerfaJly prevail'd, if
there had not been fome Foundation for the
ufe of them in the Nature of Things, and that
is the great fknefs which is in thefe outward
Wafliings to excite us to purity of Mind, and
to reprefent the great Duty which lies upon
us, to keep our Confciences undeflled, which
only can render us accepted with God.
And as thefe Warnings and Purifications
were common in other. Religions, fo the Jew-
. ijh Church was wont to receive Profelytes or
Converts by Baptifm ;. for which Cuftom*
they alledge the command of God to Mofesy
COHebr. Exod. xix. io. but (i) Dr. Light foQt fets it
tf Talmud higher, and thinks it was begun by Jacob,
Matt'liiS. Geth xxxv- 2- ^nd our Saviour, who both in
his Words and Actions throughout the whole
Gofpel condefcended to a compliance with
the Cuftoms in ufe among the Jews fo far
as they might be ferviceable to the ends of the
Gofpel, was pleafed to make choice of Bap-
tifm for the Admiffion of Perfons to the Pro-
fefliqn of his Religion, as the Jews ufed it for
the AdmilTion of their Profelytes.
Baptifm
of the Chrifiian Religion. aqq
Baptifm is very agreeable to the Nature of
the Chriftian Religion, being a plain and eafie
Rite, and having a Natural fignificancy of
that Purity of Heart which it is the defign of
the Gofpel to promote and eftablifh in the
World ; and it is fitted to reprefent to us the
cleanfing of our Souls by the Blood of Chrift,
and the Grace of Purity and Holinefs, which
is conveyed in this Sacrament, and the Spirit
of Regeneration which is conferred by it,
John iii. 5. Tit. iii. 5. And it being in ufe
both amongft Jews and Gentiles ,it was fo much
the more proper, becaufe both had already an
Opinion of the expediency of it. Chrift came
to aboliih the Ceremonies of the Jewijb Law,
and the vain and idolatrous fu perflations of the
Heathen, Worfhip, and yet fome outward Rite
of Worlhip was neceflary to be made ufe of, to
dedicate the Body as well as the Soul to God's
Honour and Service, to be a Pledge of the Re-
furre&ion of the Body, as well as of the Immor-
tality of the Soul, to put Men in mind of that
Integrity and Purity of Life which the Gofpel
requires, and to be a means of conveying it,
and to admit them as vifible Members into
the Church. And as Baptifm was very ex-
pedient to be Inftituted upon all thefe . Ac-
counts ; fo it had this peculiar advantage be-
yond any other Rite, that it was already in
great u(e and efteem, and could feem ftrange
neither to Jews nor Gentiles; but it had been
a Very ftrange thing to both, and very un-
suitable
4 1 o the Reajonablenefs and Certainty
fuitable to the Nature of Man, if the mod
Spiritual and Heavenly Religion, that can be,
on this fide Heaven, had been inftituted with-
out any external Rite for the AdmifTion into
it ; this had been to fuppofe the Church to
confifl of Angels ^nd not of Men, who have
need of ArTiiiance from outward Objects in
their higheft: Acls of Religion, it had been to
make Men to fufpecT: that the Body (as fome
Hereticks imagined) was little regarded of
God,if no notice had been taken of it,at our Re-
ception into Covenant with him; andit'befides
had been to contradict the Notion which Man-
kind have ever had of Religion, and to givethe
higheft fcandal both to Jews and Gentiles. '
z. The Sacrament of the Lord's Supper is
fo often the fubjecl: of Sermons, and .of every
good Chriftians Meditation, that very little
needs to be here faid of ir. For it is evident
that the Elements of Bread and Wine have a
peculiar fuitablenefs to bring to our remem-
brance *the Body and Blood of Chrift otfer'd
upon- the Crofs for us, to make us Partakers
of them, and to be Pledges of all the Benefits
which we receive thereby. And as the Eu
charifl was appointed by Chrift in the room
of the Pafchal Supper, fo Bread and Wine
were in ufe among all Nations in their Reli-
gious Worfhip, and nothing can more fitly
exprefs our Communion with God and with
one another, than to be entertained together
at God's Table.
So
of the Chriflian Religion. ah
So that fince there mull: be Sacraments or
External • Rites and Ordinances, they could
neither be fewer, nor more fuitable to the fim-
plicity of the Gofpel, and to the Wants of
Chriftians, than the Sacraments of Baptiim,
and of the Lord's Supper are.
chap, xxiv:
Of the Bleffed Trinity.
I Am not here to prove the Doctrine of
the Trinity from the Scriptures, but to
fuppole this to be the Doctrine which the
Scriptures teach, and to ihew that no reafon-
kable Objection can be brought againft the Chri-
flian Religion upon that Account. And in-
deed this was fuppofed to be the Doctrine of
the Scriptures , and objected againft by
(k) Heathens long before the Council of^)Lucian
Nice. Which is a ftrong proof for the Truth Ptoiopatr.
and Antiquity of this Doctrine, when it was
fo well known even to the Heathens, that they
upbraided the Chriftians with it in the fecond
Century, and in all probability from the very
beginning ; for we find it tjien mentioned as
a known and common Reproach. Suppofing ■
then this to be the Doctrine of the Scriptures,
that the Father, Son, and Holy Gholt are but
one God, I will Ihew,
* I. That
1 2 The Keafonabknefs and Certainty
I. That there is no Contradiction in this
My fiery of our Religion.
II. That other things are and mud be be-
lieved by us, which we as little underftand.
III. That the Belief of this Doctrine doth
mightily tend to the advancement of Vertue
and Holinefs, and hath a great influence upon
the Lives and Converfations of Men.
i. There is no Contradiction in this Do-
ctrine, We are ignorant of the Eflences of
Created Beings, which are known to us only
by their Caufes, and Effects, and by their
, Operations and Qualities ; and our Realbn and
Senfes and PalTions being continually conver-
fant about thefe, our Notions are formed up-
on the Ideas which we frame to our felves
concerning the Creatures, and this makes us
the lefs capable of understanding the Divine
Eflence, befides the infinite Difproportion be-
tween the Nature of God, and Humane Fa-
culties. When we fay, that God is an Infinite
and Incomprehenlible Being, we fpeak the ge-
neral fenfe of Mankind, and no Man cavils at
it ; but becaufe the Scriptures reprefent this ,
Incomprehenfible Being to us under the No-
tion of Father, Son, and Holy Ghofl, that is
Matter of Cavil and Difpute. Whereas God
being eilentially Holy and True, we mud be-
• lieve him to be what he declares himfelf to be
in the Scriptures, and he being Incompre-
henfible, we may not be able to comprehend
it. If God be infallibly True, why do we
not
of the Chrijlian Religion. 415
not believe what he delivers concerning him^
felf ? And if he be Incomprehenfible, what
Reafon can be given why the Divine Eflence
may not fubfift in Father, Son, and Holy
Ghoft? Thefe are flyled Three Perfons, be-
caufe we find diftinfl: Perfonal Ads and Pro-
perties attributed to them in the Scriptures,
and we may fuppofe Three Perfons in the
Unity of the Divine Nature without arty ap-
pearance of contradiction. This will be evi-
dent, if we confider,
1. The Diftin&ion of the Three Perfons in
the Deity.
2. The Unity of the Divine Nature.
3. The Difference between the Divine Per-
fons, and Humane Perfons.
1. The Diftin&ion of the Three Perfons in
the Deity. The Ditine Nature is in Three
Perfons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Ghoft ; in the Father Originally without ei-
ther Generation or Proceffion ; in the Son, as
communicated to him by the Father, not in
any fuch way as Sons amongfl Men have their
Nature derived to them from their Fathers,
but yet in fome fuch manner as is bed expreft
to our Apprehenfions by flyling him the Son
of God, tho' the manner of his Generation is
altogether incomprehenfible to us. The Holy
Ghofl has the Divine Nature communicated to
him from the Father and the Son, not in the
fame way whereby the Son has it communi-
cated to him from the Father, but in fome
other
414 fhe Reafonabkmfs and Certainty
other different incomprehenfible manner,
whereby he is not begotten, but proceeds both
from the Father and the Son. The Divine
Nature is communicated by the Father to the
Son by Eternal Generation, and by the Father
and the Son to the Holy Ghoft by Eternal'
Proceffion : We have nothing further revealed
to us of the Generation of the Son, but that
. he is 'begotten, or received the Divine Nature
from the Father in fome fuch way, as, for
want of a fitter Word, • we can bed underftand
by the Term of Generation ; and the Scripture
teacheth us no more of the ProceiTion of the
Holy Ghofl, but that he is not begotten of the
Father, as the Son is, but proceeds from the
Father and the Son fome other way, and not
by Generation. But' as he that would Dif-
courfe to a Man born Blind concerning Light,
muft ufe many very improper exprellions to
make himfelf, tho' never fo imperfectly, un-
derflood ; fo it is here ; we have no words
that are proper, but thefe are (ufficient to
teach us all which we are capable of know-
ing, at leaf! all that is neceflary for us to know
of the Godhead.
z. The Unity of the Divine Nature. To
fay that Three Gods are one God, or that
Three Perfons are One Perlbn is a manifeft
Contradiction ; but to fay that Three Perfons
are (not OnePerfon, but) One God, is (o far
from a Contradiction, that it is a Wonder
how it mould be miftaken for One by any
who
of the Chriflian Religion. 4 ! $
who underftand what a Contradiction means.
The Father is God, the Son is Godf and the
Holy Ghofi is God, and yet they are not Three
Gods, hut One God. For neither of thefe Three
Perfons is God diftindt. and feparate from the
reft, but they all are but One God ; One Lord
f Jehovah) not Three diftindfc and feparate
Lords, and (o not Three Eternals; nor Three
Incomprehenfihles, nor Three Uncreated, nor
Three Almighties, diftintl: and feparate from
•each other; but all the Three Perfons toge-
ther are One Eternal, Incomprehensible, Un-
created, Almighty Lord, God.
It is Majter of Difpute, what is the Princi-
ple of Individuation in Men, or what it is
which caufes one Man to be a different Indivi-
dual Perfon from another ; and it is ftill more
difficult to find out the Principle of Individu-
ation in Beings which are purely Spiritual,
and have nothing of Material Accidents Co
diftinguifh them. But whatever the Principle
of Individuation in Men may be, it is certain
that the Confequence of it is, that two Men
may exift feparately. both as to Time arrd
Place, and that one may know more or lefs
than the other, they may live at a diftance
the one from the other, and can never at once •
fill the fame Numerical Place, nor is their
Knowledge the fame : there is nothing in their
common Nature todetermine them, that they
mould be born or die together, or that there
mould be any mutual communication of the
Thoughts,
41 6 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
Thoughts, and Operations of their Minds,
much lefs that their Life and Death and Ope-
rations Ihoufd be all the very fame. So that
this Principle of Individuation, whatever be
afligned to be it, cannot belong to the'
Divine Nature, which is Omniprefent, Eter-
nal, and Omnifcient ; the Exiftence, Know-
ledge, and Local prelence of Men are Terfo-
nal not Ejfential, but Omniprelence, Eternity,
and Omnifcience are Ejfential Attributes of
God, and not Perfonal, or do not belong to
each Perfon, as they are diftinguifhed from
one another, but as they are united in the
fame Eflence ; for they are predicated of the
Father, as God ; of the Son, as God ; and of
the Holy Ghoft, as God ; and not of each fe-
verally, as Father, as Son, and as Holy Ghoft.
Every of thefe Ejfential Attributes therefore
cannot be numbred with the Terfons in the
Deity, but can be but One, . as the Ejfence
itfelf of the Deity is, and tho' the Father be
Eternal, the Son Eternal, and the Holy Ghofl
Eternal^ yet they are not Three Eternals^ or
Three Individual Beings of Eternal Exiftence,
as Three Humane Perlons are Three Men of a
Finite Exiftence. It is a Contradiction that
there ihouid be Three feparate Infinite Per-
fons ; for their being feparate muft fuppofe
them to be Finite, or to have a limited and
confined Subfiftence; and therefore Three In-
finite Perfons can be but One God, or One
• Being, which has all the perfections of Perfo-
nal
of the Chriflian Religion. a i 7
ml Diftin&ion, without the imperfe&ion of
the Divifion of Perfons.
3. From hence appears the Difference be-
tween the Divine Perfons and Humane Per-
fons. The Perfons of Men are diftincl: Men
as well as diftincl: Perfons, but this is no
ground for us to affirm, that the Perfons in
the Divine Nature are diftincl: Gods, becaufe
the Divine Nature is acknowledged to be In-
finite and Incomprehenfible, and when we
fpeak of Three Perfons in it, we do not mean
fuch Three Perfons as Three feveral Men are.
But we read of the Per/on of the Father,
Hehr. i. 3/ and of Three , that hear record in
Heaven, the Father , the Word, and the Holy
Ghoft, andthefe Three are One, 1 Joh. v. 7. and
when we fpeak of Three Intelligent Beings,
we can have no Conception of them, but un-
der the Notion of Perfons. We learn from the
Scriptures, that there are Three Perfons in
the Deity , which bear that Relation to each
other, which, is beft exprefs'd by the Terms
of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit ; but the
Terms of Father, Son, and Spirit are not
therefore fo to be underftood, as they are in
Humane Relations, and the word Peribn is
not to be underftood, as it is of Humane Per-
fons ; and therefore whereas we ufe the word
Per/on, the Greeks call them Suhftftencies, but
acknowledge that they mean the fame thing
under that difference of words.
E e And
a 1 8 Tfce Reafonabhnefs and Certainty
And yet this is all the foundation of any
pretence of contradiction in the Notion of
the Bleffed Trinity, that Men will needs un-
derdand the Terms of Perfon, and of Father,
Son, and Spirit, when they are applied to
God, as they do, when we fpeak of Men,
and from thence they conclude, that Three
Perfons in the Divine Nature mud be Three
Gods, as Three Perfons amongft Men are
Three Men ; and that the Father mud be Su-
periour and Elder than the Son, as it is in Hu-
mane Generations. But this is all Midake ;
Adam is filled the Son of God in a fenfe of
the word peculiar to himfelf, Luke iii. 38.
God is in one fenfe the Father of all Man-
kind, and in another fenfe he is the Father
of the Regenerate 'only ; and when in either
fenfe we call him our Father, we take not
the Word Father in the fame fenfe that we
take it in, when we apply it to Men ; and
when we fay he is the Father of his only be-
gotten Son, this is another fenfe of the word
Father, very different from all the former.
The Relation between the Father and Son is
not the fame in the Nature of God, that it is
amongft Men, nor are the Divine Perfons
iuch as the. Perfons of Men are; but theleare
the fitted, and the mod proper and fignifi-#
cant Terms, to exprefs the Nature of God to
us, that Humane Language and Humane Un-
derdandings are capable of. We mud ac-
knowledge that there is a vaft difproportion
and
of the Chriflian Religion. 4 1 p
and impropriety in thefe expreflions, and
that they give us but a very imperfect con-
ception of the Divine Nature, but it is the
mod perfect that we are able to have of it,
or that it is neceflary for us to have of it in
this Mortal ftate; and if we will but allow
for the incompetency of our own Faculties to
have Words and Notions adequate to the
Divine Nature, and will remember that God
is God, and that we are but Men, there
will appear to be no contradiction in the No-
tion of the Trinity.
The Divine Nature is fuch, that it has
Three diftinct Principles of Operation and
Subfiflency, which are fo defcribed and re-
preiented in the Scriptures by Perfonal Acts
and Properties, that we know them to be as
really diftinct as Humane Perfons are, which
yet being* but One God, cannot in this re-
fpect be like Humane Perfons. And whoever
will oppofe this Doctrine of the Holy Trini-
ty, muft prove that the Three Perfons of the
Trinity cannot be as really diftinct, as the
Perfons of Three Men are , tho' they are
not fuch Perfons, as the Perfons of Men. And
to prove this, he mult underftand the Na-
ture of God, as well as he underftands the
Nature of Man ; for otherwife he can never
be able to prove that Three Divine Perlbns
may not be One God, tho' Three Humane
Perfons cannot be One Man. That they are
diftinct Perfons is revealed, and that thefe
Eez Three
42 o The Reafonableneff and Certainty
Three diflind: Perfons are but one God Isv
revealed, but wherein the Diftin&ion and
the Unity of thei'e Three Perfons confifts is
not revealed, nor is it pofiible for us to un-
derfland it, at lead without a Revelation.
The Diftin&ion of the Perfons of Men is
founded in a feparate and divided Subfift-
ence, but this cannot be the foundation of
the Diftin&ion of the Divine Perfons, becaufe
Separation and Divifion cannot belong to an
Infinite Nature. There is then no Repug-
nancy in faying that there are Three Subfilt-
encies, .or Three diftincl; Principles of Perfo-
nal.Acls and Properties in one undivided In-
finite Nature, or that the Perlbns in the Tri-
nity a£r, as diftin&ly and perfonally, as Per-
fons do amongft Men, but are united in one
Infinite Nature, which is uncapable of exift-
ing in feparate Subfiftencies, tho' nt>t of act-
ing and fubfilting in Three diftindt Perfons,
or as diflin&Iy from each other, as the Per-
fons among Men do act and fubfift.
The Summ is, that in the ' mod perfect
Unity of the Divine Nature, do fubfift the
Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghoft, be-
tween whom is a real Diftin&ion, which
tho' not the fame, yet is equivalent to the
Diftin&ion of Perfons among Men. That
there is this Unity and this Diftin&ion, we
learn from the Scriptures, but what kind of
Diftin&ion this is, or how far it is to be
reconciled with our Notion of Perfons amongft
Men,
nf the Chriflian Religion* 42 1
Men, and after what manner it is confident
with the Unity of the Godhead, the Scrip-
tures have not told us, and it is impoffible
for us to determine.
IT. Other things are, and mud be believed
by us, which are as little underftood as this
Do&rine. Our Knowledge at the belt, con-
cerning Finite Things is very imperfect,
which is fo generally acknowledged by all
Men ;of Wifdom and Experience, that it is
©fteemed a great point of Wifdom for a Man
to be truly fenfible of his own ignorance ;
and it is the Character, which Solomon him-
felf giveth of the Fool, that he rageth and is
confident, Prov. xiv. 1 6. But when we con-
fider things Infinite, We are much more at
a lois. That there muft of neceffity be fome-
thing Eternal, mud: be acknowledged by all,
who underftand what is meant by the word ;
even thofe that are fo fooliJhy as to fay in
their hearts there is no God, yet muft believe
fomething elfe to be Eternal ; they muft be-
lieve that there always was fomething, be-
caufe if ever there had been nothing, there
never could have been any thing. For how
could any thing have been produced by No-
thing? Out of Nothing it might, but then
there muft have been fomething to produce
it. We can be certain therefore of Nothing,
if we are not fure of this, that there is fome-
thing Eternal ; the Atheift himfelf cannot de-
ny it, unlefs he be fo ftupid as not to know
E e 3 what
422 the Reafonablenefs and Certainty
what it means. And yet what apparent con-
tradictions may he fancy to himfelf in the
Notion of Eternity ? For what is Eternal can
never be capable of either a ihorter or a lon-
ger Duration than it always had; fo that
Millions of Ages hence it will not have con-
tinued longer, than it had done as many Mil-
lion of Ages pad. And how ftrange and
contradictory doth this feem to be, that not
only Three Ages and one Age mould be the
fame, but that there fliould be no different
between one Hour or Moment, and never fo
many Ages in refpeft of Eternity. And
there is no avoiding this • difficulty, if a
Man be of any Religion, or no Religion,
let him but apprehend what is meant by
Eternity, and he mull own both that there
is fuch a thing, and that he is utterly unable
to explain it. Here then is an unafwerable
Difficulty in a thing which all the World
mud believe, if they have it but fo propofed
to them, as to be made underftand what it
is. And there is no difficulty imaginable in
the Dodtrine of the Blefled Trinity, which
can be pretended to be greater,than that which
is infeparable from this Notion, which all
mud of necellity hold.
And if we do but obferve it in Finite
things, which are ufual and familiar to us,
and the Objects of our Senfes every day, we
Believe what we very little underftand, or
are capable of underftanding. Our Know-
ledge
of the Chrifiian Religion. 423
ledge indeed is fo very imperfect concerning
the Nature of mod things, that I may al-
rnofl venture to fay, that if we will but be
contented for the prefent to believe what
God has delivered concerning his own Nature,
we may hereafter know God himfelf as plainly
as now we know many things here. For now
we fee through a Glafs darkly, hut then face to
face ; now I know in part, but then fb a 11 1 know,
even as alfo I am known, 1 Cor. xiii, 12.
If it be thought unreaibnable however,
that fuch abftrufe Myfteries mould be made
neceflary to Salvation, and that we mould
pronounce that ivhofoever will he faved, muji
thus think of the trinity, and that all who
do not thus think and believe, mail without
douht perifh everlaftingly.
Let it be considered, that in all Religions,
whether Natural or Revealed, there mull: be
fbmething believed, which is above all Hu-
mane Comprehension, and which can be
known no further ^than in order to be belie-
ved ; there can be no Faith without all Know-
ledge, but Knowledge, if it were compleat,
would' exclude Faith, which is the Evidence of
things not feen. Knowledge may be confider-
ed either as it is general and imperfecl: ; or as
it is particular and adequate to the Nature of
the thing known ; we mull have a general
Knowledge of whatever is the Object of Faith,
but if we had a particular and adequate know-
ledge of it, there could remain nothing of it
Ee 4 un-
4^4 Ibe Reafonablenefs an d Certainty
unknown, to be the Object of Faith. The
difference between Science and Faith is, not
that we are lefs certain of the Objects of
Faith, than of the Objects of Science, but
that we know lefs of them. For Certainty
depends upon our general Knowledge, as that
God is true ; and therefore what he has re-
vealed, is as certain, as if we faw it, or could
demonftrate it in every particular. And this
general Knowledge, which is neceflary in or-
der »-to Faith is, in Natural Religion, attained
to by Reafon, and in Revealed Religion, from
Revelation. Thus we attain to fuch a gene-
ral Knowledge of the Divine Nature by Ra-
tional Evidence, as to be convinced, that In-
finite Power, and Goodnefs, and Truth, and
all manner of Infinite Perfections belong to it ;
but we believe the Divine. Perfections without
any particular comprehenfive Knowledge of
them ; in like manner, from Revelation we
attain to this general Knowledge, that the Di-
vine Nature confifls of Three Perfons in One
undivided Eflence, but we'believe thefe Three
Perfons to be One God, without any particu-
lar and comprehenfive Knowledge of fo great
a My fiery ; for then it would no longer be
a Myftery , and Faith would be no more
Faith.
I would therefore ask the Adverlaries of
this Doctrine, whether the Belief of a God,
Omniprefent, Eternal, Almighty, Omnifci-
ent, Infinitely Holy, Juft, and Merciful, be
not
of the Chrifiian Religion. 42$
not neceflary to Salvation ? No rational Man
can deny it. I enquire further, whether In-
fants and Ideots are obliged neceflarily under
pain of Damnation to this Belief ? They mull
certainly anfwer, no ; becaule none can be
obliged to Impdflibilities. I demand then
again, whether, if one or more of thefe At-
tributes, or the Agreement of them one with
another be impoflible to be underftood Cwith
a general and imperfect Knowledge) by any
who are capable of knowing and believing
the reft ; the ignorance of thefe Articles,
which are above their Underftandings (even
as to this general and imperfect way of Know-
ledge) can be deftru&ive of their Salvation ?
They muft needs fay it cannot, becaufe God
can require nothing impoflible of any Man.
And the very fame Anfwers applied to
the Cavils againft the Athanafian Creed will
be fufficient to Silence- them. That Creed
contains fuch Truths as are neceffary to be
believed in order to Salvation, but neceflary
to particular Perfons fo far only, as they are
capable of knowing them, in order to believe-
ing them. He that will he fayed, muft thus
think of the Trinity ; but this fuppofes him ca-
pable of thinking thus ; for it is ever fuppo-
fed and agreed in all Cafes, that no Man is
bound to any thing impofftble ; and that
God requires nothing of any Man either in
Faith or Practice beyond his Power and Ca-
pacity. Whofocver will be Saved, before all
things
426 ibe Keajonablenefs and Certainty
things it is neceffary, that he hold the Catho-
lick Faith ; which Faith except every one do
keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he Jhall
perijh everlaflingly. But this fuppoies that he
has already attained, or is able to attain to
the Knowledge which is neceiTary to Faith,
for no Man can hold that Faith, the general
Knowledge whereof he cannot attain. We
muft with an implicit Faith believe all that
God fays to be true, tho' it be never fo much
above our Underftanding ; but no Man is
bound to believe explicitly any more than he
"can underftand fofar, as is neceflary to fuch
a Belief. He is able to underfland fo much of
it, as to know in general what he is required
to believe, tho' he can have no fuch compleat
and comprehensive Notion of it, as to give a
particular and full Account of the Nature and
Manner of Exiftence of that which is to be
believed by him.
And let the Articles of Faith fuppofed
neceilary to Salvation according to Natural
Religion be never fo icw and plain, yet
there will ftill be fome Men, who are unca-
pable of underilanding them in any way or
meafure; and then there will lie the fame
Objections againfl thofe Articles of Natural
Religion, which are upon this Account ur-
ged againft their Faith in the Trinity it felt;
which, fo far as it is required to be known
and believed, is not above the Capacity of
the Generality of Mankind ; and no more is
required
of the Cbrijiian Religion. 427
required to be believed explicitly of any,
than they are capable of knowing in fuch a
Degree as is necellary in order to fuch a Be-
lief ; whatever Articles of Faith be affigned
in Natural or Revealed Religion, they will
be above the Capacity of many Adult Per-
(6ns, and of all Infants to apprehend them ;
who therefore .according to all Religions
may be Saved without the actual Knowledge
of thofe Articles which are never fo neceP
fary to others. And what may be objected
againfl all Religions, Natural as well as Re-
vealed , ought in Reafon to be objected
againfl none ; for there can be no force
in it.
III. This Dodrine exceedingly tends to the
advancement of Vertue and Holinefs, and
has a' great influence upon the Lives and Con-
ventions of Men.
That God the Father mould fend his Son,
his only Begotten, and only beloved Son to
be Born and to Die for us, is an endearing and
amazing Acl: of the Divine Goodnefs. The
Death not of a meer Man, but of the Son
of Gqd, Bleiled for ever, in our flead, muft
needs heighten our Love of God, and our
Faith and Dependance on him ; our Hatred
of Sin, and our Aflurance of Pardon upon
Repentance. This I have proved at large in
Difcourfing of the Incarnation and Death of
the Son of God for us, and therefore fhall not
infill upon it here.
In
4^8 The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
In like manner, whatever the Holy Ghofl (1
hath done, and is continually doing for us,
. muft needs be of more weight with us, and
give us quite another Notion and Apprehen-
sion of his Goodnefs and our own Duty, than
we could have had, if we believed him to be
a Creature. For unlefs we believe him to be
God, we cannot have that devout Love and
Faith, and Dependance upon him, which we
ought, , we cannot have that Efteem and Reve-
rence for his Communion and Prefence, which
is required of us, nor that fenfe of the heinouf-
ncfs of Sin, whereby we refift, and grieve and
do defpight to him. That Argument of
St. Paul, what know ye not that your Body is the
Temple of the Holy Ghoft .\ and many other to
the like pur pole, would be loft, but on fuppo-
fition, that the Holy Ghoft is God. We can
never have that Senfe which it behoves us to
have of our Sins committed in oppofition to
the Gifts and Influences of his Grace, without
an acknowledgment of his Godhead. So that
our Faith, and Hope, and Fear and Love is
more excited and enlarged, and all the Powers
and Faculties of our Souls are moredifpofed to
the obedience of the Gcfpel, thro' the belief
of this Dodtrine of the Trinity, than they
could be without it. And therefore as there is
nothing ajbfurd, or impoflible to be believed
in this Doctrine, fo it was very reafonable and
expedient that it Ihould be revealed.
CHAP.
of the Chrijlian Religion. 429
CHAP. XXV.
Of the Resurrection of the
Dead.
THE Refurreftion of our Saviour from
the Dead, was that which the Apoftles
chiefly infifted upon in all their Difcourfes i
For if once they could convince Men, that;
Chrift was Rifen from the Dead, they could
not fail of perfwading them into a Belief of
all that they Taught befides. There was no
other Part of their Doctrine which could feem
more ftrange and incredible than this ; and
when that, which they could with fo much
Difficulty be brought to believe, and which
could not come to pafs but by the Almighty
Power of God himfelf, was evidently and
undeniably proved to them, this muft give
that Credit and Authority to all their other
Doctrine, that it could be no longer with-
flood or gain-faid. This therefore is the Point
which the Apoftles mod of all urged, know-
ing that if they could gain this, all the reft
would follow of Courfc, and that every Man
muftofneceflity be Converted to the belief of
the whole Gofpel of Chrift, who was once con-
vinced of his Refurredtion,
And
430 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
And St. Paul in his Defence before King
Agrippa puts the Queftion, Why Jhould it be
thought a thing incredible with you, that God
jhould raife the Dead > A&s xxvi. 8. which
implies, that it is a very unreafonable thing
to think, that God cannot Raife the Dead,
and that therefore there was all the Reafons
in the World to believe that he had raifed
Chrift. For there was fo great Evidence of
his Refurre&ion, and fo many Men daily
WitnefTed it at the peril of their Lives, that
if their Adverfaries would but allow the thing
to be poflible, there could be no Doubt re-
maining, but that Chrift, was indeed raifed
from the Dead.
The Apoflle Argues that it is a very ab-
furd thing to lay, that God cannot raife the
Dead. What Reafon could any Man give
why God cannot doit? Or how durft'any
Man fo limit and confine the Infinite Power
of God by his own Notions and Conceptions
of things, as to fay that the Refurre&ion of
the Dead cannot be effected by him ? This
is unreafonable and abfurd in the higheft De-
gree, and therefore it is manifeft that Chrift
is Rifen, and that there is to be a General
Refurre&ion of the Dead, fince there is no
other Objection that can lie againft, it, but
the Impoflibility of the thing it (elf. For
our Refurre&ion is aflerted in the Scriptures,
as a neceflary Confequence of Chrift's Refur-
reftion, 1 Cor. xv. 20. and his Refurrection
was
of the Cbrifliah Religion. 431
was fo well attefted, that the greatefi: Ene-
mies to Chriftianity could not deny the Evi-
dence of the Facl:, fuppofing the thing pof-
fible; but they would not own it poflible,
that fuch a thing mould be, and upon that
account rejected all the Evidence that could
be produced, as tending only to prove an Im-
poffibility, and fo not to be regarded. I mall
therefore mew the poiTibility of the Refur-
reclion of the Dead, and that it is unreafon-
able to think it incredible that God fhould
raife the Dead.
If it be incredible, that God mould Raife
the Dead, it muft be upon one of thele Two
Accounts ; either becaufe he cannot, or be-
caufe he will not do it. For what God both
can and will do, is fo far from being Incre-
dible, that it is a moll: undoubted Truth.
Therefore I mall
Firll, Prove that God is certainly able to
Raife the Dead ; and, ,
Secondly, That he certainly will do it.
1. That God is certainly able to Raife the
Dead, is a thing credible in it (elf, and there-
fore ought to be efteemed incredible by no
fort of Men whatfoever, tho' they have no
Knowledge of any Revealed Religion, if they
have but right Apprehenfions concerning God.
No Man can have a true Notion of God, but
he mufl know that God is a Being of Infinite
Power and Wifdom ; tjiat he made the World,
and all things therein ; that he preferves and
fuftains
433 the Reafonabtenefs and Cert dint y
fuftains all Creatures, and that all things are
wholly at his Will and Difpofal, to do with
them as he pleafes ; that nothing can oppofe
or refill his Will, or give him the lead hin-
drance in any, thing- which he is pleafed to
undertake. How then can it feem incredible
that God fhould raife a Dead Man to Life a-
gain, when he at firft gave him his Life?
And is it not as eafie to redore it to him, as
to give it him at firfl ? Might we not as well
difpute that it is impoffible for a Man to be
Born, as that it is impoflible for him to be
Railed from the Dead, if our own experience
did not convince us of that, but not of this ?
God, who gave all that Power and Ability,
which Natural Caufes have to produce their
Effecis,may, if he pleafes, produce the fame Ef-
fects immediately by himfelf. For it is not be-
caule he (lands in need ofany help from Natural
Caufes, that he has appointed them, but becaufe
it feemed bed to his Infinite Wifdom to ap-
point this Courfeand Order in the World.
And it is evident even to Natural Reafon,
that there mud have been fome who were im-
mediately Created by God, and were not
born of others, as Men are fince, that there
mud have been fome Firfl Parents, fome,
who had no Parents themlelves, but were of
Gods immediate Creation, that there mufl
have been fome who were the Firil of all
Mankind, and therefore could be born of no
others. Since then Man mull of neceffity
have
of the Chrijiian Religion. 433
have been firft formed by God himfelf, and
not have come by a Natural Birth into the
World ; it is evident, that God might have
made as many Men and Women after this
manner as he had pleaied ; and he, who is
the Author of our Nature, may acl without
it, and as much beyond and above any Na-
tural Powers and Faculties in his Creatures,
as it feems beft to him. And it may as well
be thought incredible, that God mould at
firft make Man, as that he ihould be able to
raife him up again after Death; for Death is
only the End of Nature's power of work-
ing, not of the Power of God himfelf;
who, as he originally made the Race of
Mankind, fo he appointed the Nature of
Things, and gave it a Hinted Power, which
it cannot exceed ; but his own Power is In-
finite, and no- Bounds can be fet to it.
When a Man is once Dead, Nature has
done with him, and can never recover him
to Life again ; for God ordained at firft that
according to the Courfe of Nature he ihould
only be born, and live here a while; not
that his Life fhould be reftored again to
him after Death. But he is not fo confined
himfelf, that he cannot give Life to the
Dead, but has referved this as his own Pre-
rogative, and above any thing in Nature's
Power. God, who formed Adam of the
Duft of the ground, might have formed all
F f. Mankind
434 ^je ReaforiaMenefs and Certainty
Mankind fo, if he had pleafed ; and he can
as eafily raife all Mankind to Life again out
of the Dull; as he made jhe firft Man out
of it.
And the Atheift, one would think, has
of all Men the lead pretence to fcruple the
Refurrection of the Dead, who muft fuppofe
that Mankind at firft lprung out of the
Earth as Plants do , by a Spontaneous
Production ; and for him to pretend
that the Bodies of Men cannot be raifed
to Life again by an Almighty Power is
as unreafonable, as any thing in Atheifm it
felf can be.
When at certain Seafons every Year, we
fee things .receive a New Life, as it were, ac-
cording to the Courfe of Nature, we may
well conclude, that if fo ftrange an Altera-
tion can proceed from Natural Caufes, then
furely God is able to effecl: that which is
much more wonderful, and to raife even
thefe Bodies of ours after they are dead and
rotten in the Grave, to Life again. And
fince the Corn which is Sown in the Earth,
is not quickned except it die, and will not
revive and grow again and come to perfe-
ction unlefs it be firft buried in the Ground,
and undergo great Alterations there ; it is a
foolifh thing, as the Apoftle argues, to
doubt of the Refurre&ion of the Dead, be-
caufe we cannot underftand the way and
manner
of the Chrijiian Religion. 435
manner of it. Let Men Anfwer all the Dif-
ficulties in Nature, and it will be time e-
nough afterwards to difpute with them about
a Refurredtion ; but when we are at a lofs
about the mod common and obvious things,
it mull: be great Preemption to deny the
Refurredtion, becaufe we cannot compre-
hend it ; when alas ! what is there befides
that we are able to comprehend ? Will we
prefume to fay that God can do nothing,
but what we underftand how it may be
done ; when every thing we fee, may in-
form us that his Wifdom is Infinite, and his
ways pafl finding out. Indeed if we under-
ftood every thing elfe, there might be fome
pretence to fcruple- the RefurretStion, be-
caufe we do not underftand how it lhall be.
But when our Ignorance is lb notorious in
all • other things, • it is the heighth of Folly
and Perverfenefs to think our felves com-
petent Judges of fuch a Myflery as this. So
far are we trom being able to make any Efti-
mate of God's Power, and fo far is the Re-
furredtion from being Incredible, becaufe
there may be Objections made about it,
which may feem unanswerable ; that if no
other Anfwer could be given, this would be
fufficient, that God can do more than we
can have the leaft Thought or Conception
of; and that it is no Argument that he can-
not do what we cannot conceive how it
F f 2 ftiould
436 Tbe Reafottabknefs and Certainty
iriould be done, ib long as there is nothing ;
contrary to the Divine Nature in it, nor
which implies a Contradiction, the Doctrine
of the Reiurre&ion would be very credible
and certain too, whatever other Objections
might be urged againfl: it ; which yet are
not in themfelves fo formidable as they may
be imagined to be.
All the Objections againfl: the Refurre-
ction of the Dead are either againfl the Re-
furrection of Bodies after their Corruption
and Diflblution, or againfl: the Refurrection
of trie lame Bodies of Men which they had
before their Death, becaufe the parts of our
Bodies are in a perpetual Change and Flux
here, and after Death by feveral Accidents,
as by the devouring of Humane Bodies by
Men, or by Fifh, or other Creatures, which
1 are afterwards eaten by Men, it may come
to pafs that the fame parts which Com-
pounded one Man's Body, fhall afterwards
belong to anothers, and yet in the Refurre-
ction they can belong but to one of thefe Bo-
dies. But,
i. Bodies after their Corruption and the
Diflolution of the Parts which compofe
them may be reftored to Life by the Re-
union of thefe Parts again. We have feve-
ral Inflances of this in Natural Philofophy
that Bodies divided into never fo minute
Parts, tho' thefe Parts be mix'd and con-
founded
of the Chriflian Religion. 437
founded with the Parts of other Bodies, may
by Chymical Operations be reduced to
their former State and Condition, and
which is of nearer affinity to the Subje£fc in
hand, after the Afhes of a Plant have been
fown in a Garden fairer and larger Plants
have fprung up than had been known of
that kind in the place where the Experiment
was made! And (/) Mr. Boyle thinks it^/^'
fcarce to be imagined what Expedients to confident,
reproduce Bodies, a further Difcovery of the "on about
Myfteries of Art and Nature, may lead us Mor-^ffi*
tals to. And much lefs, (ays he, can our dim i^fum-
and narrow Knowledge determine what means, ^Mm
even Thyfical ones, the mojl wife Author of
Nature and abjolute Governour of the World is
able to employ to bring the Refurreclion to pafs.
And where the powers of Nature fail, we
know that God is Infinite, and can want
no means to effect whatever he pleafes.
2. We may rife with the fame Bodies
which we have here, notwithflanding any
Change or Flux of the parts of our Bodies
whiie we live or any Accidents after Death.
It is agreeable to Reafon, and to the Obfer-
vations of Philofophers and Phyficians to
believe that the Bones and Mufcles and
Nerves, and all the Effential conftitutnt Tarts
of Humane Bodies are of fo firm and folid a
fubftance as to fufier little Alteration during
our Lives, when once they are come fo their
F f 3 full
438 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
full growth and proportion, but to conr
tinue the fame till we die ; and the Altera-
tions which they undergo before Men come
to their full Stature is by Addition of parts,
not by the diminution of thofe wherewith
we are born. It appears from a late Dif-
(m)Dr. courfe of a (w) Learned Phyfician, that
oSiog. Nutrition is a fupply of the Fluid Parts, and
2d D>f- that trje proper Subflance of the Solid Parts
courfe of fuffers no Diminution, but in fome extraordi-
and mtfi- nary Cafes, and therefore can Hand in no
<im need of Reparation but in fuch a Cafe. For
the whole Body is Vafcular, or made up of
Ve/Iels and Pipes replenifhed with their fe-
veral Subftances ; fo that in an Atrophy the
Fibres become dry, and the Nerves and
Veilels are contracted, and fhrunk for want
of the Spirits and Juices and Liquors which
before filled and diflended them. But the
Solid Parts are of fo durable a Subflance,
that they can fuffer no Diminution, but by
fuch Corrofives to diflblve them, as mud
produce Ulcers, and fuch as would affec-t
the Fibres with fo intolerable Pains, that
the Torments of the Stone and Gout would le
moderate and eafie to them ; which in a Con-
fumption would be Universal in all parts of
the Body ; whereas there is no fuch Symp-
tom in any Part ; and in the greateft Con-
fumptions the Bones are found to retain
£heir entire Bignefs $ tho' a piece of Bone is
fooner
of the Chriftian Religion. 439
fooner Diflblved by a Corrofive Liquor,
fuch as Aqua-Fortis, than Mufcular Fibres
of equal quantity or- weight.
It is wont to be obferv'd upon this Sub-
ject, that when the Change of Parts is gra-
dual, and in the courfe of fome Years the
Body may dill be the fame, as it could not
be, if the Change were made all at once.
A Ship or 'Houfe remains the fame t^io' it
be never fo often repaired, and tho' the Ma-
terials in Succenlon of Time be all or mod
of them renewed .* whereas if it mould be
taken to pieces all at once, and all the Ma-
terials fhould be changed, and new Mate-
rials of the fame Figure and Dimeqfions
fhould be exactly in the fame manner fra-
med and built up together in their flead,
thefe would make another Houie or Ship,
and not the fame that was before.
But when the Parts which conftitute the
Humane Body, and give it the Denomina-
tion of the Body of this or that individual
Man continue the fame, the fame Perfon has
the fame Body in his Old Age, that he had
in his Youth, as truly as he has the fame
Body in Sicknefs, which he had in Health ;
and the fame under the 'Languiiliings of a
Confumption, which he had in his greateft
Vigour and Strength. For the Change is
only in the .variable and accidental Parts,
which are not necejfary to conftitute the Body
F f 4 of
440 The Keafondblemfs and Certainty
of fuch a Man ; «and the neceffary conftituent
« Parts (tho' they were changed or altered,
as in fome very rare cafes they may be)
being fo few in Comparifon of the reft,
which make up the Bulk of a Mans Body,
can hardly be fuppofed by the devouring of
Canibals, or by any other Accident to be-
come the conftituent Parts of any other
{DefiaZ Mani Body- ( n ) Santtoritu from his Sta-
Medicina tick Experiments has Obferved, that a very
Aph v; inconfiderable part of what we eat, is turned
Hx. ix!' to Nourifhment; and from the fmall pro -
Seft. Hi. portion which the Neceffary conftituent Tarts
Aph. x. kear t0 t^e re^^ ancj tjje unfjtnefs 0f them,
as of Bones, &c. to nourifh, it may be con-
cluded, that little or nothing of that which
turns to Nourifhment, can be fuppofed to
be of thofe conftituent Parts ; and confider-
ing further the great Changes which hap-
pen in our Bodies in the continual Flux of
Parts, and the fmall Proportion again, which
the conftituent, or neceffary effential Parts
have to the reft, we may conclude (fuppo-
fing thofe parts as well as others to fuffer
Alteration) that it is the greateft odds, that
the conftituent Parts which turn to Nourish-
ment, do not by* that Nourifhment happen
to belong to the conftituent Parts of the
Mans Body who is nouriihed by them when
he comes to die. So that if a Man mould
live wholly upon Humane Flefh, which it
is
of the Chriflian Religion. a±i
is not to be believed that ever any Man
did, yet it would perhaps be above an Hun-
dred to one whether any conflituent Part of
his Body were made up when he died, of
the conflituent Parts of any other Man's
Body. And befides, it muft be granted by
all, that Believe a God and a Providence,
that a particular Providence may take fuch
effe&ual care of us as to referve to every
Man his own Body in all the Ejfential Parts
of it ; the Hairs of our Heads are all Num-
bred ', that is, they are as well known to
God, as they could be to us, if we had
told and numbred them never fo exactly ;
and therefore much more the neceffary
Parts of us are under his Cognizance and
Care.
Thefe neceffary conflituent Parts then be-
ing the fame, God may fupply the reft, as
he mail fee fitting ; and the Body will be
the fame after the Refurreclion, that it was
in this Life, tho' the Bodies of Men at the
Refurredtion muft arife in all the Perfection
of an Humane Body, and therefore muft
have no part wanting : For if any part of
an Humane Body Ihould be wanting, they
would not have all the perfection of fuch a
Body, tho' they Ihould be never fo perfect
in all the parts which they be fuppofed to
have. For if a Man having but one Eye,
or one Ear, mould be able to fee or hear
with
44 2 The Reajonablenefs and Certainty
with that one better than ever any Man
did with two, yet it would flill be a defed in
his Body to want an Eye, or an Ear.
All the ufes of any one part of our Bo-
dies are not perhaps yet fully known, and
the Dependance which one part has upon
another may be fuch, as that it may be re-
quifite that thofe parts fhoukl be raifed for
their Relatiye ufefulnefs, which may feem
to have no proper ufe of their own after the
Refurrection. The Sight is a Senfe which
may be capable of Improvements beyond
what we now are able to conceive, as we
may conclude from th« Improvements which
have been made by the help of Microfcopes
and Telefcopes. And who knows, but that
in the Glorified State our Eyes ihall have
that perfe&ion, as to be able to difcern the
Contexture and Motions, and the whole
Frame of thofe pure, Spiritual and Ccele-
llial podies; and then thofe parts, which
now to the. naked view, and much more
when difcerned thro' Microfcopes caufe fo
much Admiration, will be (till much more
admirable to behold, when they are tho-
roughly feen and fully underftood by us ;
and to want thofe parts which may feem to
be then no longer of any ufe, would be to
want one great Argument of our praife of
God in the contemplation of his Wonderful
Works.
But this is mentioned only to mew that
an
of the Cbrijiian Religion. 44 3
an ordinary Fancy, if it be allowed to take
the Liberty which fome have done upon
this Subject, might eafily propofe as pro-
bable Reafons in Defence of the Received
Doctrines, as can be framed againft them.
( 0 ) The Author of the Anfwers to the Or-
thodox amongft the Works of Jujiin Martyr, C<0 OS**,
fays that fome parts of our Bodies, tho'
they will then have no direct u feral nefs,
yet will be raifed at the laft Day, to be
Memorials to us of the Wifdpm of God in
that ufe which we had of them in this
Life. 'And (j>) St. Auftin fays, that the
Glory of God will be magnified, in that he ^Jfh'i
will have freed thole Members from the lib. xxit. *
Corruption to which they were fubjeft co-
here. However, it ought to 'fufhee Chri-
flians that our Bodies fhall be like to Chrift's
Body, and therefore iliall have the full per-
fection and proportion of all the parts con-
flicting an Humane Body, as his Body had
after, his Refurrection. We know that we fkall
It like him, 1 Joh. iii. z. and as for any
thing further it will be time enough to know
it at the Refurre&ion.
II. It is not only Credible and Reafonable.
to believe that God can, but likewife that
he will Raile the Dead. The Revelation of
his Will in his Holy Word ought to put
this beyond Difpute among Chriftians. But
jbefides, it appears to be requifite from the
Nature
44+ Ibe Keafonabknefs and Certainty
Nature of Man, confiding of Soul and Bo-
dy, that there fhould be a RefurredHon of
the Body ; it is fit that the Man fhould be
punifhed that Sinned, and that the Man who
lived well here, and fuffered for Righteouf-
ne(s fake, fhould be rewarded for it. But if
the Soul only be Punifhed, or the Soul only
be Rewarded, the Man is not rewarded or
Punifhed ; for the Soul is but part of the
Man, but Soul and Body together make up
the whole Man, and therefore it is requifite
that the Soul and Body fhould be re united.
For we muffl all appear before the Judgment
Seat of Chrift, that every one may receive the
things done in his Body, according to that he
hath done, whether it be good or bad, z Cor.
v. 10. For this Reafon it is requifite that
the Soul fhould be again united to the fame
Body ; otherwife the Soul and Body would
conftitute a 'Man, but not the fame Man
that was before, the Body not being the
fame ; for it mult be the fame Soul and the
fame Body that make the fame Man. As in
Adam all die, ' even . fo in Chrift fiafl all be
made alive, i Cor. xv. i'x. the fame Body
.therefore that died in Adam is to be made
alive in Chrift; who Jhall change our vile
Body, that it may be fajhioned like unto his
glorious Body, according to the working, where-
by he is able even to fub due all things unto him-
felf Philip, iii. 21. Chrift himfelf rofe
with
of 'the Chriflian Religion. 445
with the fame Body that was Crucified, and
we are to be like him at the Reiurreclion,
and to have our Bodies Changed into the
likenefs of his Glorious Body. And indeed,
if a New Body were afTumed how could it
be a Refurreclion ? Which implies the
Rifing again of that Body, which after the
Separation of the Soul was Buried in the
Grave ; and other wife, as it is ufually argued,
one Body may be punifhed for the Sins com-
mitted in another. +
If it be faid that the Body wov\y the In -
flrument of Senfation to the Soul, but is it
felf capable of none, and therefore mud
be urfcapable of Rewards or Punifhments.
It may perhaps be Anfwered, that this is
more than can be abfolutely concluded from
the Notions of Modern Philofophy againfl
the General Senfe of Mankind, and the Phi-
lofophy of all former Ages. However, the
Body being unable to determine it felf in
its Senfations, if it have any of its own.
1 confefs I cannot think this Argument fit
to be infifted upon, in as much as no Acti-
ons can be capable of Rewards or Punifh-
ments, but fuch as proceed from choice.
But it mud be acknowledged, that the
the Soul may be capable of more Happinefs
or Mifery, when re-united to the Body,
than in its Separate State. For befides the
Anguifh, or the Peace and Joy of Mind,
befides its own Reflections, and its proper
Operations,
a^6 The Keafonablemfs and Certainty
Operations, which the Soul is capable of
in a State of Separation from the Body ; it
is capable of being affected with Senfations,
which arife from its Union with the Body.
And that thefe may be anfvverable to what
a Man's Actions in this Life have been, the
Soul mufl be United to the felf fame Bo-
dy, fo difpofed and qualified to affect the
Soul as it was in this Life, only with In-
finitely greater, more exquifite and more
lafting Degi^ of Pain or of Joy and Sa-
tisfaction ; %et without any mixture of
grofs and (eniual Pleafures in the Righte-
ous, but only fuch as are fuitable to Spi-
ritual Bodies. And this Difpofition bf Bo-
dy depends upon the Vertuous or Vicious
Actions and Habits of Men here ; for a
Body by Vicious Practices and Cuftoms
prone to raging and furious Pailions, infa-
' tiable Appetites, and tormenting Inclinati-
ons and Defires (without any thing to gra-
tifie or affwage them) mull: have quite ano-
ther effect upon a Soul, than a Body fub-
dued to the mild and calm and obedient
Temper of Religion and Vertue. And tho'
God could by his Almighty power form
another Body to that Frame and Difpofi-
tion, which the Body of any particular
Man was in, when his Soul departed out
of it ; yet it doth not feem agreeable to
jthe Divine Goodaeis and purity, by his im-
mediate
of the Chrijlian Religion. 4.4.7
mediate power to frame a New Body to the
depraved Temper and Inclinations of a Vi-
cious Man. And we are fo little acquainted
with the Union of tfie Soul and Body, that
for ought we know, a Soul can be United
only to its proper Body. The Truth is, we
know nothing of thefe Matters, but from
the Scriptures, all beiides is only Conje-
cture. But the Do&rine of the Scriptures
is probable even to our Reafon, tho' indeed
it ought to over-rule Reafon, efpecially in
things which are (b obicure, and fo little
underflood by us. God has declared that
he will raile thefe Bodies to Life again at the
Day of Judgment ; and whatever we may
think of it, to him all things are alike eafie,
it is as eafie for him to do, as to fay it.
CHAR
448 The Reafonablenefs and Certainly
CHAP. XXVI.
Of the Reafons why Lhrift did not fhew
himfelf to all the People of the Jews
after his RefurreSlion.
ST. Peter fpeaking of Chrift's Refurre-
6tion fays, him God raifed up the third
Day, and fhewed him openly \ not to all the
People, hut unto Witneffes chofen he fore of God,
even to us, who did eat and drink with him,
after he rofe from the Dead, Acls x. 40, 41.
After his Refurre&ion he was fhewn openly,
but not to ali the People ; he was feen in a
plain and open manner, yet not fo publick-
ly, as to make all the People Witnefles of his
Refurredtion. The Will and good Pleafure
of God is a fum*cient Reafon to us of all his
A&ions, efpecially in A&s of Mercy : For
it would be a flrange Return made but to a
Man for any Favour received, to be capti-
ous and quarrellbme about the manner of
his bellowing it, inflead of being grateful
to him for it. But befides this General Rea-
fon which ought to be of Force with us in
all Cafes, there are Reafons peculiar to the
prefent Cafe, whereby we may be able to
give an Account of it, even according to our
own Apprehenfions of things.
I. There
of the Chrijlian Keligion. a/l^
I. There are Reafbns peculiar to this Di-
fpenfation of Chrift's Refurreclion ; why
Chrifl fhould not fliew himfelf to all the
Pep'ple, after he ■as rifen from the dead.
II. It had not Deen fuitable to the other
Difpenfations of God towards Mankind for
him to do it.
III. Great Numbers of the Jews were gi-
ven over to hardnefs of heart, and would not
have believed, tho' they had ieen Chrifl:
after his RefurrefUon.
IV. If they had Believed, their Conver-
sion had not been a greater proof of the
Truth of his Refurre&ion, than their Un-
belief has been.
V. The Power of his Refurrection mani-
fefted in the Miraculous Gifts bellowed up-
on the Apoftles was as great a Proof of his
Refurre&ion, as the Perfonal Appearance of
our Saviour himfelf could have been.
i. There are Reafons peculiar to this
Difpenfation of his Refurre&ion, why Chrifl
fhould not fhew himfelf to all the People
after he was rifen from the Dead. Chrifl
after his Refurre&ion was to a£fc according
to the Majefly of the Divine Nature, not
according to the Infirmities and Condefcen-
fion of the Humane ; the time of his Con-
verting with Men was at an end at his
.Death, and then another method and man-
ner of Difpenfation was to begin; he was
then to Converfe only with his particular
G s Friends
At o The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
' Friends and Favourites, to fatisfie them of
his Refurre£tion, and to inftrud: and enable
them both by their Doftxme and Miracles
to iatisfie others. It com not be iuitable
to the Dignity of his Majerty; which he had
afiumed after his Refurre£fcion, to fubmit
himfelf to the Cenfures of his Enemies ; he
had differed enough from them already in
the State of his Humiliation, and mull he
' never be above the Sufpicion and Scrutiny
of their Malice ? Shall not his Refurrecl:ion
free him from it ? When they faw him hang-
ing upon the Crols, they cried out with up-
braiding and iniblent Scorn, that they would
believe in him, if he would come down
from thence ; but neither did they deferve
fuch a Miracle to be wrought at their Plea-
fure, who thus called for it, nor was it fuit-
able to the Divine- Difpenfation that it
fhould be wrought. It was neither fitting
that he mould fave himfelf from Death, nor
that he fhould appear to them after he "was
rilen from the Dead. He was to Die for
our Redemption, and as we had wanted the
Argument from his Refurre&ion for the
Truth of our Religion, if" he had come down
from the Crofs; To if he had appeared to all
the Jews, we had wanted other Evidence ;
which, as \ iliall ihew, at leaft amounts to
all the Proof which that could have given.
In the State of his Humiliation our Sa-
viour was pleafed to fufler himfelf to be ex-
poled
of the Chriflian Religion, 451
poled to the contradiction of Sinners, and to
a(I their Affronts and Injuries ; but whoa this
their Hour and the Power of Darknefs was once
paft, they were to fee him no more, but
with confufion of Face and terrour of Mind;
yet his Mercy was (till the fame towards
them ; one of the greatefl Perlecutors was
converted by a Voice from Heaven, the
Son of Man fpeaking^to him from thence,
that he might be the happy Inftrument in
the Conversion of others,, and a Pattern to
them of the long fiffering of Chrift, 1 Tim.
i. 1 6. But his manifeftation of himfelf to
St. Paul at his Converfion was with dread-
ful Awe and Majefty, not in that mild and
gracious Glory, in which he was {&en by
St. Stephen ; and it is referved for thofe who
perfecuted and pierced him, to look upon
him with Confternation and Anguifh at the
Laft Day, Rev. i. 7.
x. It had" not been fuitabJe to the other
Difpenfations of God towards Mankind for
Chrifl to be mown openly to all the People.
God might work fuch aftonifhing Miracles,
and flrike fuch Terrors into the Minds of
Men, as to make it iaipoifible for any one
to doubt of his Exiftence, or of the Truth
of his Word; but he doth not all which he
can do, but what he in his Wifdom fees fit
.to be done; he doth not ule all the Means
which fome Men may conceit he might ufe,
but leaves Men without excufe, and then
G g 2 requires
452 The Keafonabknefs and Certainty
requires their Faith and Obedience at their
peril. To imagine that Chrift mould have
app* red promiicuoufly unto all, is as un-
reafonable, as to fuppofe that God fhould
communicate himfelfto all ali"ke, or that he
fhould have fpoken from Heaven to Men
without the Meflage and Miniftry of his
Prophets. For when Chrift was rifen from
the Dead , he was no longer to ad like a
Mortal Man, but as in his Glorified State as
our Lord and King, and as God in our Hu-
mane Nature, now no longer fubject. to any
of its Imperfections ; and therefore he was
no more to come himfelf to the People, as
he had done in the State of his Humiliation,
but to fend his Apoftles and Difciples among
them, as he had before his Incarnation fent
the Prophets.
3. Great Numbers of the Jews were given
up to hardnefs of heart, and would not have
believed, tho' they had feen Chrift after his
Refurredtion. Thofe, who when they had
(een our Saviour's Miracles, had vilified
them, and blafphemed the Holy Ghoft, by
whom they were wrought, had their hearts
hardncd, that feeing they might fee and not
perceive, and be converted. And of this Num-
ber the Chief Prjefts and Elders muft be fup-
pofed to be, who hired the Soldiers to Con-
tradict, and Stifle the Belief of hisRelurre-
clion with a falfe Story of their own Inven-
tion. TheChief Priefb before had Confulted
to
of the Chrijlian Religion. 453
to put Lazarus to Death, when he was un-
deniably known to have been raifed from
the Grave, Johnxii.ic. So far were they
from being brought to a Belief in Chrift by
the fight of Lazarus, that they fully verified
that Saying, that there are fome, who wi&
not believe, tho one rofe from the Dead. La-
zarus was fhewn openly to all the People,
and lived among them for many years after
he had been reftored to Life again, when he
had been Dead four Days; and they would
not believe, tho5 they faw and converfed
with him, but were the more enraged at it;
Chrilt himfelf therefore after his Refurre-
&ion did not vouchfafe them his prefence,
but ufed other means which were more pro-
per.
4. If the Jews had believed in Chrift, their
Converfion had not been a greater Proof of
the Truth of his Refurredrion, than their
Unbelief has been. Their flubbornnefs and
hardnefs of heart was foretold by the Pro-
phets, with their Difperfion, and the De-
ftrud:ion of Jerufalem ; and the Propagation
of the Gofpel (according to the Prediction
likewife of the Prophets) in fo Miraculous a
manner, not only at a diftancq, but in Ju-
Jea, and in Jerufalem itfelf, notwithftanding
all the Oppofition which the Jews could
make, gave as great a Teftimony to it, as
their Favour and Protection could have done.
And therefore it was juft with God rather to
G g 3 leave
454 fl)e R-eafonablenefs and Certainty
leave them to the hardnefs of their own
hearts, than to ufe liich further Methods
with them as were unfui table to the Divine
m Difpenfation ia the' Myftery of our Re-
demption, and would either have only hard-
ncd them to a greater Degree, or at lead
would not have proved more effectual to-
wards the Manifestation of the Truth of the
. GofpeJ.
5. The Power of Chrift's Refurre&ion
manifefted in the Miraculous Gifts bellowed
upon the Apoftles, was as great a proof of
his Refurre&ion, as the Perfonal Appear-
ance of our Saviour himfelf could have been.
Our Saviour iliewed himfelf to Witneffes cho-
Jen hefore of God, to be Witnejfes of all things
which he did both in the Land of the Jews and
in Jerufalem, A&s x. 3 9, 41. thefe Men knew
his Life and Do&rine, they had been In-
truded by him, and had forfaken all for
him, and according to his Promiie were en.
dued with Tower from on high, to enable them
to teflifie to the whole World, that they had
not only leen him, but had often Converfed
with him after he role from the Dead. And
one of their Chief Qualifications was, that
they were but a i'ew, poor and ignorant Men
without Force or Policy, without any Art or
Contrivance ; they could tell a plain Truth,
but could neither feign nor diflemble; if
they had been more in Number, the Con-
vcrfion of the World had been fo much the
lefs
of the Chriflian Religion. 455
lefs Miraculous ; and they were not chofen
out of the Scribes and Elders who had been
ufed to Artifices and Falfhood, but had them
all along their Enemies, and oppofed to their
Craft and Power an honed fimplicity of
Mind, that neither knew what belonged to
Deceit, nor feared any in fo good a Caule ;
nor were they in the leafl difcou raged to fee
their own and all other Nations againft them.
God had chofen the Foolifh things of the World
to confound the Wife ; and God had &hofen the
weak things of the World to confound the things
which are mighty, 1 Cor. i. 27.
Thefe Men under all Necefllties, and Per-
fections, and Dangers, and Torments,
both Living and Dying Witnefled that they
had feen Chrilt alive after he had been Cru-
cified, and tho' they were but very few in
Comparifon of their Enemies, yet confidered
as Witnefles they were many ; for he was
feen by alovefve hundred at once, which is a
vaft number in any matter of Evidence ; and
if fo many Men be not a fufTicient Teftimo-
ny, no numfjer of Men could have been.
That which is demonftrated but in one way,
is as certain as if it were demonfirable in .ne-
ver fo many Methods ; and he who fees a
thing plainly with his two Eyes, may be as
fure of it, as if he had never fo many Eves
to lee it withal. It is written in the Law of
MofeSy that the Testimony of two Men is true,
or Credible, and to be relied upon for Truth;
G g 4 John
4$ 6 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
John viii. 17. and it is the Law and Practice
of all Nations to content themfelves with a
fmall number of fufficient Witnefles in proof
of the mofl: important Affairs. And if thefe
Witnefles chnfen before of God fpoke,and a&cd,
and fuffcred, as no Men would or could have
done, if they had not been well aflured of
what they teftified, and aflifted from above
in preaching the Gofpel ; the Truth of the
Refurrection of Chrift is as infallibly deli-
vered to us by their Teftimony, as it could
have been by the Teftimony of never fo ma-
ny more: for all that never fo many others
could have done, would have been but the
lame thing over again, which thefe Men cer-
tified by many infallible Proofs ; and what is
once infallibly proved, is as certain as if ail
the World fliould agree in declaring it. It
is not the number of Witnefles, but the Cha-
racter and Qualifications of the Perrons, and
the Evidence it felf in its fall force and cir-
cumftances, which are chiefly to be regarded
in Matters of this Nature. If but a few
Men can make it fufficiently appear, as the
Apoftles did, by undeniable Miracles, that
what they fay is true, and that God himfelf
confirms the Truth of it, they then appeal
to every Man's own Senfes, before whom
they work their Miracles, and make every
one that fees them a Witnefs to the Truth of
their Doctrine ; God himfelf bears Witnefs
to it, and the Jews might havefaid in this,
as
of the Chrijiian Religion. a<t
ns they did in a very different Cafe, What need
we any further Witneffes ? for we ourfelves have
heard of their own mouths ', in'the Miraculous Gift
of Tongues, or feen it with our own Eyes, in
the many wonderful Works which were conti-
nually wrought in the mofl publick manner, in
Teftimony of the Refurre&ion of Chrift.
Our Blefled Saviour therefore gave as full
proof of his Refurre&ion, as if he had appear'd
in the Temple, or in the midft of Jerufalem, to
the whole People of the Jews. For this had
not been more effectual to the Converfion of
mofl of them, nor more fufficient to evidence
the Truth of the Gofpel, than his Appearance
to his Difciples was ; and if the Jews had una-
nimoufly believed, it could not have contributed
more to convince Men of the Truth of the Re-
furre&ion, than their Unbelief has done ; he
lent his Apoftles with a Miraculous Power, as
convincing as his own Appearance could have
been ; and all things confidered, the Jews af-
ford us as full Evidence in behalf of the Gofpel
by oppofmg it, as they could have done by
their compliance with it. And fince we have
fufficient Teftimony to refolve our Faith into
the Divine Veracity, the certainty is the fame,
whether the Witneffes be more or fewer, be-
caufe it depends upon the veracity of God,
which is always the fame, whatever the means
be, by which our Faith is refolved into it.
CHAP.
458 "The Reajoiiablenefs and Certainty
C H A P. XXVII.
Of the Forty Days in which Chrifl remained
upon Earth after his RefurreStion, and
of the manner of his Afcenfion.'
OUR Blefled Saviour had certified hisDif-
ciples ofhisRefurre&ion in fuch a man-
ner as to give them many infallible Proofs of it,
or elfe it is impoilible for any thing to be infalli-
bly proved ; and that which is chiefly to be con-
sidered in this matter is, that he was Ceen by
them not once but often, not for a fhcfrt time,
or at a hafty Interview, but for forty Altoge-
ther, and then he performed the common Acti-
ons of Humane Life, he did eat and drink with
them, and difcourfed with them of the things re-
lating to his Kingdom. To whom alfo he Jhewed
-if elf alive after his Taffwn by many infallible
proofs \ being feen of them forty days, and /peak-
ing of the things pertaining to the Kingdom of
God, Ads i. 3. That which I here defign is,
to make ibme Obfervations upon the Conver-
fation that our Saviour had with his Difciples,
during the Forty days between, his Refurre-
iftion and his Afcenfion, and upon the manner
of his leaving them, when he afcended into
Heaven.
2. The Scriptures acquaint us that our Sa-
viour was feen of his Dilciples Forty Days, or
that he vouchfafed them his prefence the
greateft
. of the Cbrijiian Religion. 45 9
grcateft part of that time which he remained
upon Earth after his Refur region. But in what
manner all that time was (pent with them, we
are no where told ; which is no wonder, if we
confider how much of his former Life is con-
cealed from us.
In the Scriptures, which are written for our
Inftruclion, and in the plainefl and fincerefi:
manner in the World to inform us of all things
neceffary to our Salvation, we have nothing
taken notice of, for Orientation nor for Orna-
ment, but many things omitted in the Life of
Chrift, which are thought needful in Humane
Authors, to make up a com pleat Hiftory.
We have no more mentioned of, his Parentage
than was necellary to make it evident that he
was descended from David, and born of a Vir-
gin, as the Prophets had foretold of him.
When he was born, we read that the Shepherds
and the Wife-Men came to Worfhip him; that
he was Circumcifed, that he was brought to
Jerufalem to be prefented to the Lord, and
that he was carried into /Egypt to avoid Herod's
Cruelty, and hereby known Prophecies were
fulfilled. Afterwards he was brought to Na-
zareth upon the death of Herod, and from that
time we read no more of him 'till the twelfth
Year of his Age, when he Difputed with the
Doctors in the Temple. And then we are told
that he went down to Nazareth, and was fub-
ject to his Mother, and to Jofeph, and in ge-
neral Terms, that he encreafedin Wtfdom and
Stature,
q6o lihc Keafonabknefs and Certainty
Stature, and in favour with God and Man',
as it was before faid of him, that he grew and
waxed Jlrong in Spirit, filled with Wijdom, and
the grace of God was upon him, Luke ii. 40, $z.
The next time we read any thing of him, is
when he was about Thirty years of Age, and
came to John to be Baptized.
Thus not only during his Infancy and
Childhood there is little related of our Blefled
Saviour, but his riper years are pafled over in
Silence; in all which time we may be fure
that there was.no Speech or Action of fo Di-
vine a Perfon, but what well deferved the ob-
servation of all that knew him, and was more
worthy of mention in Hiftory, than all the
Renowned Adventures and Exploits, or than
the Wife or Witty Sayings which adorn the
Lives of the Greateft among the Sons of Men.
But Modefty, Humility, and a Contempt of
the praile of Men were fome of the great and
ufeful Doctrines in which he came to inftruct
Mankind j and he could not do this more ef-
fectually than by his own Example, in leading
a mean and obfcureLife, little known or taken
notice of in the Worid, 'till two or three years
before he was to leave it by a Cruel and infa-
mous Death. He did not chufe to fpend his
time in places of publick Refort and Converfe ;
and when he Difputed in the Temple, yet no-
thing of the particulars is mentioned. This ob-
fcure and unknown Perfon was to rebuke and
comptroll the Pride and Vanity of the Popular
Scribes and Pharifees. And
of the Chriftian Religion. 4S1
And after he had appeared in the World,
very much of his Life was fpeot in privacy
and retirement ; not many of his Difcourfes
are delivered down to us, and the greateft part
of his Actions are omitted. For if they had
been all written and defcribed in their fevera!
Circumftances, many Volumes mud have been
taken up in the Narrative of them ; infomuch
that St. John fuppofes that men the World itjelf
could not have contained the Books that Jhould
have been written, Joh. xxi. z$. that is, as we
might exprefs it in our Language, he did a
world of things more than thefe, which are
related of him ; and in the fame fenfe of the
Word, St. James fays, that the Tongue is a
world of Iniquity, Jam. iii. 6. The meaning of
St. John is, that hardly any words could ex-
prefs how many other things were done by our
Saviour, befides thole which he had fet down.
Chrifl might have employed fome accurate
Hiftorian to compofe the Annals of his whole
Life with the greateft exa&nefs imaginable ;
but he was pleafed to be reprefented to the
World very imperfeftly by fuch as knew no-
thing of what belonged to the writing Hiftory
any farther than to be able to tell the itri&and
neceflary Truth. The Evangelifls wrote his
Life with the fame Humility with which he
lived.
And it is obfervable, that when St. John
fays that there were fo many other things which
Jefus did, he fpeaks with relation to the things
done
£u6l The Keafonablenefs and Certainty
done by him after his Refurrection, having
juft before given an account of what our Sa-
viour had faid to St. Peter. And fo in the fore-
going Chapter, when St. John has declared
how our Saviour certified . St. Thomas of the
Truth of his Refurre&ion, he adds, and many
other Signs truly did Jefus in the pre fence of his
Difciples, which are not written in this Book,
hut thefe are written, that ye might believe, that
Jefus is the Chrift, the Son of God, and that be-
lieving ye might have Life through his Name,
Joh. xx. 30, jr. So that we are acquainted
with no more than was necefTary, of what
pafs'd between our Saviour and his Difciples
after his Refurrection, the reft concerns us not
to know; it was for their Inftru&ion and en-
couragement in their Duty, and they were em-
powered to teach and inftruft us. We know
that beginning at Mofes and all the Prophets he
expounded unto them in all the Scriptures the
things concerning himfelf, Luke xxiv. 27. but
We are no where told what were the Particulars
of his Expofition ; only we are fure that the
Apoftles in their Explications of the Old Te-
ftament followed the Interpretations which he
• had given. We read that he was feen of them
forty days, and fpoke of the things pertaining to
the Kingdom of God} from whence we may con-
clude, that the time between theRefurreciion
and the Afcenfion of Chrift, was chiefly ipent
in comforting and inftruciing them, and in
expounding to them the Scriptures concerning
"his
ef the Cbrifiiaa Religion. 463
his Paffion and Refurre&ion, and the corning
of the Holy Ghoft after his Afcenfion.
St. Paul mentions, that he was feen ly alove
five hundred Brethren at oncet of whom the greater
part were then flill alive to teftifie the Truth '
of what he laid, 1 Cor. xv. 6. tho' this Particu-
lar, however remarkable, is omitted by the
Evangelifts ; for they relate things juft as they
faw it needful upon every Occafion, and fince
they faid enough to convince Men? they we
not careful to lay all that might be faid, they
were ready to die in Teftimony of what they
delivered, and daily wrought Miracles to con-
firm it ; and therefore were not follicitous to
lay together all the Particulars, or to put
them into anyexadt Order and Method ; they
declared what they knew, and their Miracles
proved it, and they depended not upon fuch
Niceties as Humane Proofs have need of.
We may reafonably conclude then, not-
withftanding thefilence of the Sacred Writers,
that when Chrift had once fully manifefted
himfelf to his Difciples, and latisfied them in
his Refurrecliori, the reft of the time till his
Afcenfiort was moft of it fpent with them in
.Divine Difcourfes for their Inilrudion and
Comfort ; fuch as thole are which we read in
the Evangelifts, one of whom declares that a
full account of all that pa fs'd between him and •
his Difciples was more" than could well be ex-
prels'd. That happy ' time was employed in
pure and Spiritual Joys and Contemplations,
in
464 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
in forming and preparing them for the Recep-
• tion of the Holy Ghoft.
As foon as Mary Magdalen knew our Lord
after his Refurrc£rion, me fell at his feet to
Worfhip him, and would touch his Sacred
Body, Matt, xxviii. 9. Joh. xx. 17. For this
Reafon perhaps too, as well as out of Devotion
to him, that fhe might be able to give the Apo-
fUes the better account of his being rifen again.
But he forbad her, faying, touch me not, for I
am nofyet afcendedto my Father, and then lends
her to his Difciples, to his Brethren, as he with
infinite Love and Condeicenfion ftyles them.
He was not yet afcended, or was not then
about to afcend, but to flay many days upon
Earth, and there would be time enough for
her nearer approaches to him ; cither for the
encreafe and confirmation of her Faith, or for
her Acknowledgment and Adoration. After
his Refurre£tion Chrift made himfelf known to
his Difciples by degrees, and by feveral Ap-
pearances to them at diftant times, in divers
Plages, and in different manners ; he fuffered
them to doubt of that great Article of our
Faith for a while, that he might overcome
their Unbelief, and extort a Conviction from
them by fuch means, as that no Man unlefs he
would be very unreafonable and obftinate,
fliould pretend any Caufe to doubt of it after-
wards. But when he had thoroughly convince!
them of his Refurre&ion, we may conclude
from what we read of his Converfing with
them,
of the Cbriflian Religion. 465
them, that from that time he admitted them
to a freer and more intimate Communication
with himfelf, and Difcourfed with them in the
mod mild and gracious and indru&ive manner
of all which it concerned them to know per-
taining to his Kingdom, or which they were
capable then of knowing, before the deicent
of the Holy Ghoft ; fometimes perhaps vouch-
fafing his Preience to one, and fometimes to
others of them, and mod commonly to them
altogether, when they were aflembled, as we
find they generally were. And when he with-
drew himielf, it was becaufe their Mortal State
would not bear a conftant and uninterrupted
Attendance for fo long a time upon their Blef-
fed Matter ; and becaufe it was requifite that
they by degrees fhould be accuftomed to en-
dure his Abfence, and to walk by Faith, not by
Sight ; and after his Afcenfion, the Holy Ghoft
the Comforter did not immediately come upon
his Departure from them, but their Faith was
to be exercifed in the expectation of him for
the fpace of Ten Days, and then his Promife
was to be fulfilled in the fitted and mod pro*
per Seafon, on the Fead of Pentecoft.
In few words, Chrift was feen of them, fays
the Scripture, forty Days ; whicli implies that
thefe for the mod part were fpent in his Pre-
fence ; and we are in the fame place told how
this time was employ 'd, infpeakiug of the things
pertaining to the Kingdom of God.
II. We may obierve the manner how our
Saviour left his Difciples, when he afcended up
H h from
^66 The Keafonabknefs and Certainty
from them into Heaven. He had before pre-
pared them to expect his Afcenfion • for be-
ildes what he had faid to them before his death,
immediately upon his Refurrection he fent
this Meifage to his Difciples by Mary Magdalen,
Go to my Brethren, and fay unto them, I afcend
unto my Father, and your Father, and to my God,
and your God, Joh. xx. 17. They were in hopes,
it ieems, that he would at this time have refto-
red again the Kingdom to Ifrael, and did not
think he would have left them, before that,
which they lb much defired had been accom-
pliilicd. However, taking his Leave of them,
he commanded them that they fl?ould not depart
from Jerujalem, but wait for the Vromije of the
Father, which jays he ye have heard oj me. And
whilft he was giving them repeated AfTurances
that this Pro'mife mould be mod effectually
fulfilled, while they beheld, he was taken uj>,
and a Cloud received him out of their fght ;
he was not fnatch'd away from them by a iwift
and violent motion, like Elijah, and carried up
in a fiery Chariot, which might dazle their
Bgfit, that they could not difcefn him in his
Atcent, but he was lifted up and removed from
them leiiurcly, and by degrees, they 'looked Jled-
faflh towards Heaven as he went up, by a viiible
and eafie motion, and they had a clear view of
him, 'till at laft a Cloud received him gut of
their jkht. It is probable that al! the Dilciples
to the Number of about an hundred and tiveniy,
*»pud mentioned Ads i. 1 $. were prefent to behold >
^.Hift.the AkQVJ g Saviour. (7) The Apoitle
of the Chriflian Religion* 467
St. Thaddeus declared, tho' this (as well as
many other things) is not inferted into the
Scriptures, that a great multitude of the Saints
and Heavenly Hod went up with him ; we
read of the Appearance of two Angels upon this
Occafion, who acquainted the Difciples, that
this fame Jefus whom they had thus evidently
feen taken up from them into Heaven, jhould fo
come in like manner, as they had feen him go into
Heaven. And St. Paul informs us that the
manner of his Coming at the lad Day will be
with his mighty Angels, or the Angels of his
Power, x Thef i. 7. From whence we may
conclude,according to the Account of St. Tbaa-
deus, that the Holy Angels vifibly attended
him in his Afcenfion.
Tne Difciples were all much iurprized at a
thing fo wonderful, and flood gazing up into
Heaven after him, 'till they were certified not
Only by their own Senfes, but by the Meilage
of the Angels that he .was gone from them into
Heaven, no more to be expected from thence,
till the Day of Judgment.
We have therefore the plained and fulled
Evidence that can be defired, Both of the Re-
iurrection and Afcenfion of our Saviour. He ■
(hewed himj elf alive to his Difciples after his
Pajfwn hy many infallible Proofs, he was feen of
them forty days, and Converfed and Difcourfcd
with them, tho' we are not told after what
manner, and by what Intervals of time he was
pleafed to vouchfafe them his Prefence ; this
being concealed from us, as very many of the
Hh i Particulars
4 68 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
Particulars are of his former Life before his
Crucifixion. But at the end of the fpace of forty
days, whillt he was in the midft of them, he
alcended into Heaven in the light of them all,
in f'ucha manner, that they diftinctly faw and
beheld him, and kept their Eyes nYd upon him
in his Afcenfion, and aVifion of Angels befides
informed them, that he is to return in the like
manner, when he fhall come to Judge the
World.
CHAP. XXVIII.
Tfty fome Works of Nature are more efpecially
afcribed to God; why Means was fometimes
ufed in the working of Miracles, and why Faith
was fometimes required of thofe, upon whom, or
hefore whom Miracles were wrought.
I. A LL the Powers of Natural Caufespro-
jfjL ceeding from God, ^tfmayjuftly be
afcribed to him, which is wrought by them, for
he works as truly by Second Caufes, as by his
own direct: and immediate Power, in producing
any Effect:. The Order and Frame of Nature
was Originally by his Appointment, and by his
Care and Providence and Influence it is upheld ;
and therefore the Scriptures afcribe the effects
of Natural Agents to God as the Author of
them; becauie thefe can do nothing but by his
Support and Influence, and the continuance
and prefervation olNaturalCaufes in the produ-
ction of their Effects for lb many Ages in one
'conilant
of the Cbriflian Religion. q&p
conftant Tenour is a manifefl and wonderful De-
monftration of the Divine Power and Wifdom.
But thofe things may be faid more efpecially to
be done by God himfelf, whereby upon fomeex*
traordinary Occafion his Power and his Will are
more particularly manifefted, or his Promife is
fulfilled ; for in thofe things his Care and Provi-
dence is more concerned to bring them to pafs ;
and therefore God may employ a more than or-
dinary concourfe to fuftain and influence the Pow-
ers of Nature that they may not fail in fuch Cafes
to produce their EfTe&s according to their ufual
and fetled Courfe.
II. Miracles are more peculiarly the Works of
God, becaufe they are wrought without the con-
currence or fubferviency of Natural Means. For
tho' fometimes outward Means were ufed in the
Miraculous Curing ofDifeafes,yet they were fuch
as could have no erfeft in the Cure, but rather the
contrary,- as when the Man that was born blind,
recovered his Sight by warning in the Pool of Sz-
loam at our Saviour's Command, after his Eyes
had been anointed with Clay made of Duft and
Spittle. The Ointment made of Dufl and Spittle
was fo far from having an^ efTecl: towards the
Cure, that it would have been much more likely
to have put out the eyes of a Man that had feen;
and the wafhing afterwards could only remove
that which was lo far from being a Remedy, that
it mull hayebeen an obftru&ion to the bed fight.
As many Miraculous Cures were wrought by
our Saviour without any more than a word fpcak-
ing, and fometimes even without fo much as that,
to
a^o. The Reafonabknefs and Certainty
to (hew that he had no need of Means; (o when
any Means were ufed, they .were fuch as apparent-
ly could not tend to the Cure, and were not ufed
as Remedies, byt as Circumftances, in the work-
ing his Miracles to raife the Attention of the Be-
holders, to imprint what was done the deeper up-
on their Memories, and to give the greater Cre-
dibility to the Hiftory of his Miracles. For all
matter, of Fa<5t is to be proved or difproved by
Circumftances ; and the more Circumftances con-
curr in any Action, the lefs liable it is to Miftake
or Impofture. Our Saviour therefore was pleas'd
that his Miracles mould always be accompanied
with remarkable Circumftances, which were
fometimes of one kind, and fometimes of another,
the better to work upon the variety of Mens
Tempers and* Difpofitions ; but whatever outward
Means was at any time ufed by him, it could have
the Nature only of a Circumftance, and was no
more proper and effectual to produce the Miracle
than any other might have been.Some he touched,
fome he only fpoketo, and others he fent to the
High-Prieft, that he might be a Witnefs of the
Cure. Now the touch, the (peaking, or the fend-
ing could have no effect as outward Means, but
only as they were attended with an inward and
Divine efficacy. But all thefe were confiderable
Circumftances to excite the Obfervation of thole
who were prefent at theie Cures, and to preierve
the Remembrance of them to Pofterity.
HI. Tho' our Saviour had the merit abfolute
and unconfined Power of working Miracles, at all
times, and before all Perfons, whenfoever he plea-
fed,
of the Chriftian Religion. 47*
fed, yet we may obferve that lie fometimes refu-
fed to exercife it. For tho' he could always do
his Marvellous Works, yet it was not fit that they
fhould be always done, but then only when they
might be ufeful and ierviceable to the Ends for
which they were wrought, and to his Defign of
coming into the World, to manifeft himfelf by
working them. And that this was the Reafon
why our Saviour did fometimes require Faith as a
Qualification in them who came to be healed, and
at other times refufed to work his Miracles before
Unbelievers, will be evident, if we confider, that
1 . Chriit. had given undeniable proof of his Mi-
raculous Power in many Instances, before he re-
quirecfrFai'th, as a Condition in fuch as came to
him to fee his Miracles, and to receive the benefit
of them. When the Jews demanded a Sign of
our Saviour, Joh/ii. 18. he had wrought before
them the greateft of ail his Miracles, in St. (r) Je- (>•) Com-
rom's Judgment, by calling the Buyers and Sd- ™ent- in.
lers out of the Temple. But they were fo lift- IS, " '
reafonable as upon this very 'account to ask for
another Miracle • what Sign fie weft thou unto' its,
feeing that thou doejl thefe things ? Whereupon 1
Saviour fignifies to them that he would rifesr
from the Dead $ and this was no rcfufal, but 6nly
a fhort delay of his working other Miracles ; for
at that very Pafsovtr when he was in Jerusalem fo
the Feaft-day many believed in his blame , when they
faw the Miracles which he did. And then the fir?!:
time we find Faith required as a Difpofi tion'or
Preparation in Men to have Miracles wrought for
their Cure, or their Conviction, is Matt. y.W'u 58.
Mark
The Keafonabienefs and Certainty
Mark vi. 5. befides the reje&ing of the Scribes
and Pharifees, Matt, xii. 58. And before the time |
to which thefe Texts have Relation, Chrift had
Cured all manner of Difeafes, and caft: out many
Devils, and his Fame was fpread abroad throughout
all the Region round about Galilee, and even through-
out all Syria, Matt. iv. 23,14. Mark i. 28. He
had Cured the Centurions Servant at a diftance,,
and had reftored to Life the Daughter of J 'air us
a Ruler of the Synagogue. Where it may be ob-
ferved, that he commended the Faith of the Cen-
turion, tho' the Cure was wrought upon his Ser-
vant ; that he Exhorted theFather not to be afraid,
but to believe, when his Fear or Faith could have
no influence upon his dead Daughter, Ue had
caft out a Legion of Devils at once, and permit-
ted them to enter into the Herd of Swine, to con-
vince even the Sadducees, if any thing could con-]
vince them, that they were Evil Spirits which he
had cad out, Mat. viii. 13. Mark v. 9, 22. An
when our Saviour's ^Miraculous Power had thu
manifefted it felf upon all forts of Perfons, upon
the Abfent, upon the Dead, and upon others, who
could neither hope for, nor defire relief of him,
and this in the fight of many who were ftill Unbe-
lievers, and of fome who charged him with carting
out Devils by Beelzebub, Matt, xii. z^.Lukexl. 1 5-.
it was highly reafbnable, that he Should after-
wards require a Belief of what he had already
done, and was again able to do, before he would
extend his Healing Power towards Men, and that
he fhould work no new Miracles for the Con-
viction of fuch as difregarded and disbelieved all
that he had done before. It
ef'tbe Chriflian Eeligi&n.
It doth not appear, that Chrift' ever requi-
red Faith of any before his working of a Mi-
racle, who had not already. feen him work
Miracles, unlefs it were of his own Coun-
try-men, and of fome who came to be heal-
ed. His Country-Men by their AftoniuV
ment at his Do&rin and his mighty -Works*
feem to fhew that they had no Experience
of them before, but that they Were un*
known at leafl to the generality of them,
any otherwife than by. Report ,• but there
was a peculiar Cafe, as I ftiall prefently
prove. Thofe who came to him with no
cavilling defign, but with a defire and ex*
peclation of help from him, cannot be fup*
pofed to doubt of his Power to do that for
them, which they had feen him do for others s
but many applied themfelves to him upon
the common Report and Fame of his mira-
culous Works, and it was requifite that
thefe ihould believe what they had heard fo
we'll attefled, if they would receive that Be-
nefit which they befought of him. But as
to others, it cannot be proved that Chrift did
ever, in order to ins working a Miracle, re-
quire Faidi of them, who had never feen him
work any Miracle before, though, if he had
done it, there might have been ihfEcient
Reafon for it. But all befides, in whom the
want of Faith is at any time alleged as the
Caufe, why they had no Miracle wr6ught
upon their Account in order to their Con-
I i virion,
4? 2 The Reafonahlenefs and Certainty
virion, had in all probability fetn Miracles
wrought by him before, which they would
not believe, and. that was Reafon enough,
why no more fhould be wrought for diem,
to be defpifed, as the former had been : Or
however our Saviour's Miracles were lb pub-
lickly and frequently wrought, that they
might have feen them, either before or after-
wards, though they were not done purpofe-
ly for them, when they required it. Thofe,
of whom Ckrift at any time required Faith,
before he would work Miracles, were either
fuch as had fome malicious and captious
Prejudice againft him, or fuch as came to
be cured of their Difeafes and Infirmities.
Qi.) As for die Captious and Malicious,
there was great Reafon why they mould
be rejected, and no Miracles mould be wrought
for them. We read that he did not many migh-
ty works in his own Country, becaufe of their
Unbelief, Matth. xiii. 5 8. But though he
did not many mighty Works there, yet he
did lbme, which indeed were not many in
comparifon of what he did in other Places.
And there was a particular Reafon why he'
did no more there, becaufe it was his own
Country, and they upbraided him with his
mean Birth and Education ,• whereupon Jefus
feeing them offended in himy /aid unto themy
A Prophet is not without Honour, fave in his
own Country, and in his own Houfe ; and fo,
as it immediately follows, be did not many
mighty
of the Chriflian Religion. 48 J
mighty Works there lecaufe of their Unbelief*
He had done many wonderful Works in the
adjacent Countries, and his Fame was fpread
throughout all Galilee ; but he, who knew
the Hearts of all Men , (x)
faw how unfuccefsful all his .„SX) No,n, 1U0<! et>a>»>
Works would be upon his own potumt nmies muit*,t
unhappy Country- Men, who had fed ne multas faum vtr-
been fo little moved with what ZlZ'm^iiZ
they had heard of him, and with
what many of them probably had feen him
do in other Places, that they only de-
rided and vilified him : And he, who had fo
tender a Compa/fion for all Mankind, and
with great AfTeclion wept over Jerufalefn^
could not but have fuch a Concern for his
own Country, as to refrain the working of
thole Miracles, which he had other wife de-
(Igned, forefeeing, that they would only
ferve to aggravate their Guilt, and encreale
their Damnation, till by his Refur*e<5tion he
ihould give an undeniable Evidence of his
Divine Power, and then ihould fend his Di£
ciples among them after his Alcenfion, to
whom they would have greater regard, as' .
to Strangers, againft whom they had not
that unjuft and foolifh Prejudice. For We
never read, that the Apoftles did any where
forbear to work Miracles, becaufe of Unbe-
lief, but in all Places, and among all Per-
fons they Ihewed forth the wonderful Works
of God. But when the Works of Chrift,
Ii z which
484 ' The Beafonablencfs and Certainty
which were fo wonderful, and fo well known
in all Parts of Galilee, had fo ill effect upon
thofe of his own Country : St. Mark fays,
That . he could there do no mighty Work, fave
. that he laid his hands upon a few fick folk and
healed them, and he marvelled hecaufe of their
Unhelief Mark vi. 5, 6. He wrought fuch
Miracles as his infinite Goodnefs meerly
drew from him, and then wondred at the
Obftinacy of their Unbelief, which hindred
him from working any more. For there are
lome things which God himfelf cannot do,
not for want of Power, but becaufe it would
imply an Imperfection in him, a Defect of
Power, and a Contradiction to his Divine
Nature to do them. God cannot lye, he ahi-
deth faithful, he cannot deny himfelf, x Tim.
ii. 13. Tit. i. x. He can acl nothing unbe-
coming his own Wifdom and Goodnefs ; he
cannot do Miracles, when he fees they will
be to no gfrod purpofe, but will be abufed to
a very ill one. Yet to fhew his Companion,
and to manifeft that his Power wras not re-
trained in it felf, but that their Unbelief had
retrained it from them, he laid his Hands
upon the Sick and healed them, but did no
more ; for he can do nothing improper and
unfit to be done.
The requiring of more Miracles, when
fufficient had been wrought already, was a
Tempting and Provoking of God, it was im-
pioufly to bid Defiance to his Power, and
to
of the Chriflian Religion. 48 5
to Challenge him to do whatever they durfl
demand of him.. Our Saviour therefore re-
Dukes the Scribes and the Pharifees and the
Sadducees^ for Seeking after a Sign, Mattb.
xii. 39. xvi. 2,. But the flrfl time, he had
wrought a Miracle juft before* in the Cure of
the Man, whofe Hand was withered, and of
the blind and dumb Man, who was poflefl
with a Devil ; and when they ftill required
farther Signs, and being unmoved with what
had been already done, they had now char-
ged him with calling out Devils by Belzehuh,
our Lord had great Reafon to refufe to work
any more Miracles before fuch obftinate and
ungrateful Men, which he faw were fb far
loft upon them, that that ferved only to ren-
der them altogether unpardonable in Biaf-
pheming the Holy Ghoft ; and therefore he
tells them, That there was no other Sign left
for them, who had not yet incur^H that Sin
which was never to be forgiven, but the
Refurrection of the Son of Man. This was
a Sign which might convince the mod Incre-
dulous, and which denied to none, but was
refer ved as the laft means. And feveral
things which were done and faid by Chrift
in private, were not to be divulged till after
his Refurre&ion, becaufe before they might
fall under Sufpicion ; but that, and the Mi-
racles Wrought by vertue of it, would fufli-
ciently prove whatfoever his Difciples mould
fay of him. When they again demanded
Ii 3 a Sign,
j\%6 The Reafonablenefi and Certainty
a Sign, he had a little before healed great
Multitudes, and had fed fevcral Thoufands
by Miracle in the Wildernefs, and therefore
he again refers this wicked and adufyrous Gene*
ration of Men to the Sign of the Prophet Jonas.
We have as little Reafon to imagine, thai;
our Saviour ihould work Miracles to gratifie
the Curiofity of Herod, Luke xxiii. 8. who
hoped to have feen fome Miracle done hy him ;
or that he fhould expofe his Divine Power
to Herods Contempt and Mockery, when
he had fo lately wrought a Miracle in curing
the Ear of Malchus, who was fo far from be-
lieving in him, that he was one of them who
came to apprehend him. It was an Acl: of
Mercy to Cure this Man, but to work Mi-
racles only to give Men an occafion to vili-
iie that Power by which they were done,
could be neither worthy of God, nor any
Charity t^Men. but ic would have been un-
fuitable to the Character and Authority of
Chrift, to debafe himfelf to a compliance
with them, who ufed him with fuch Scorn
and Derifion, and only reviled and tempted
him. Herod was difappointed in his hope
and expectation of feeing a Miracle, and
was not denied it for want of Faith : For he
believed that Chrift had wrought Miracles,
and fu ppofed that John the Baptift, whom he
had Beheaded, was rifen from the dead, and
that therefore mighty Works did /hew forth
themfehes in him, Matth. xiV. i. But per-
ceiving
of the Chrijiian Religion. 487
ceiving Kim not to be John theBaptift, hefet
him at naught.
(2.) In the cafe of thofe, who came to
defire his help for the Cure of themfelves
and others, though they had not feen any
Miracle wrought by him before, yet it was
reafonable that Chrift mould work no Mi-
racle for them, if they wanted Faith in what
he had already wrought, and did not
believe him able to perform, what they
would feem to expect and defire him to do.
When he had given fo many Demonflrations
of a Divine Power, he might juftly expect
an Acknowledgment and Belief of it in all,
that came to him, and would receive any
Benefit from it. He might furely bellow his
Favours and Benefits upon his own Terms ;
and no Terms could be more reafonable, than
that thofe who came to ask them mould
really believe, that he was able to bellow
them, and fhould apply themiertes to him
with an expectation to receive what they
asked of him : Otherwife to come to him for
Cure, was no better than to Tempt , to Mock
and Deride him ; it was to ask what they
did not believe he could beflow ,• but they re-
lblv'd only to try what he could do, fuppofmg
that if they received no good, yet however
there could be no hurt in t"he Experiment.
Now can any Man think, that the Mi-
racles, which Chrifl wrought, were to be
bellowed upon no better Confiderations than
I i 4 tshefe >
48 8 The Reafotiablenefs ani Certainty
thefc ? Or that thofe were in any meafurc
worthy to be Cured, who came with fo
indifferent an Opinion of him, and with fo
Jittle expectation of Relief ? Chrift wanted
no opportunities of fhewing his Power ; he
had (hewn it in many and wonderful In-
flances, and would do it again as often as
he faw occafion, upon fit and proper Ob-
jects : But if they fo little regarded what he
had already done, as not to believe that he
had done it, and could again perform the
fame, they but ill deferved what they came
for ; the Divine Power and Goodnefs was
not thus to be debafed and expofed, as to
be employed in the Cure of Men, who ask-
ed, what they did not believe he could per-
form t but only thought it would cofl them
nothing to make the Tryal, and for that
Reafon made Application to him. Our Sa-
viour therefore fays to the Father, who came
to him in behalf of his Deaf and Dumb Son ;
If thou canfi believe all things are pojftble to
him, that believeth ; and upon that humble
and pa/Fionate Declaration, Lord I believe,
help thou my unbelief, the evil Spirit was call
out of his Son, Afarkix: 2,3. 24.
The End and Defign of Chrift's Miracles
icquired, that thofe, who. were Cured by
him, inould believe in him. For they were
wrought with a defign to convince Men that
he was the Son of God, and that he was
conic npt fo much to, Cure their Bodies, as
to
of the Chrijiian Religion. 489
to fave their Souls, and he forgave their
Sins at the fame time that he healed them
of their Difeafes, Mark ii. f. And fince
Faith is fo neceflary a Doctrine of the Go-
fpel, it was as requisite that Chrifl fhould
teach this , as any other Doctrine : But
how could he do it more properly and
more effectually than by requiring Faith in
thofe who came to be healed ? If they would
partake of his Mercy, they muft qualifle
themfelves for it, by believing that he was
the great Prophet and Me/lias, who was
then fo much expected, and of whom it was
foretold, that he Ihould make the Blind to
fee> and the Lame to walk, and the Deaf to
hear, &c. Luke vii. xz. Ifa. xxxv. 5. And
unlefs their Bodily Cure did conduce to the
Cure of their Souls by Faith and Repen-
tance, it would be but ill beflowed upon
• them, and therefore with great Reafon might
be denied them. And upon this Account
we find our Blefled Saviour both requiring
Faith in fome, and rewarding it in others ,
to whom his miraculous Power was extend-
ed, Luke viii. 48. xviii. 42. And St. Paul
perceiving that the Cripple at Lyftra had Faith
to be healed, immediately healed him with-
out being ask'd to do it, Alis xiv. 9.
2. Faith in the Miracles of Chrifl is re-
quired of Men in all Ages of the World,
though Miracles are ceafed ; and if this be
Reaibnable now, it could not but be fitting
then
/}90 Tloe Reafonablenefs and Certainty
then, that tnofe who came to Chrift, mould
believe in him for the fake of the Miracles,
which they had been certified that he had
done upon others. For Miracles, when they
are fully attefted, are as fufficient a Ground
of Faith, as if we had feen them done ; and
to manifeft that they are fo, our Saviour
might require Belief in his former Miracles,
of thofe who expected any Advantage from
fuch as they defired him to do. If they
would give no Credit to the Miracles, which
were fb notorious, and fo abundantly tefii-
fied by Multitudes who law them done,
how iliould others believe in Times to come,
when no more Miracles mould be wrought
for the Conviction of Unbelievers ? Might
no Man be required to believe, unlefs he faw
the Miracles himfelf ? Then how mould the
the Church fubfift in future Ages, when
Miracles would be no longer wrought, bur
were for great Reafons to be with-held ?
We mud now believe upon the Account of
the Miracles which were then done, and why
therefore mould they not be required to be-
lieve upon the Account of them, who lived
at the very Time, and in the fame Country
where they were wrought, though they had
never feen them ? Our Saviour in thefe In-
ftances might introduce that Method, and
. eftabJiih the Evidence and Certainty of thofe
Means and Motives, whereby Faith was to
be produced in Men of all fucceeding Agesy
and
of the Christian Religion. aq %
and might hereby flgnifie and declare, that he
requires the fame Faith of us from the Tefti-
mony of others, that he would do, if we had
feen and experienced his miraculous Power
our felves.
CHAP. XXIX
Of the Ceafing of Prophecies and Miracles.
PRophecies are generally of more Con-
cernment, and afford greater Evidence
and Conviction in future Ages, than when
they were fir ft delivered. For it is not the
Delivery, but the Accomplifhment of Prophe-
cies, which gives* Evidence to the Truth of
any Dodtrin : The Events of Things in the
Accomplifhment of Prophecies are a {landing
Argument to all AgQS, and the length of Time
adds to its Force and Efficacy ,• and therefore
when all that God faw requifice to be foretold,
is deliver'd to us in the Scriptures, there can
no longer be any need of NeVv Prophecies ;
which would be of lefs Authority than the an-
cient ones, inafmuch as their Antiquity is the
thing chiefly to be regarded in Prophecies.
For if to foretel Things to come be an Ar-
gument of a Divine Prefcience ; the longer
Things are foretold before they come to
pafs, the better muft the Argument needs
be.
492 • The Eeafonab/enefs and Certainty
be. tie therefore that requires New Pro-
phecies to confirm the Old, little confiders
the Nature of Prophecies, and wherein the
Evidence and life of them lies ; but in great
Wifdom and Caution will give no Credit to
the bed Evidence, unlets there were fome-
thing Iefs evident to prove it by.
The chief Enquiry then feems to be con-
cerning the Ceflation of Miracles ; but from
what has .been elfewhere faid, the Reafon
may appear, why the miraculous Power,
which the Apoftles received by the defcent
of the Holy Ghoft, was not to be of perpe-
tual continuance in the Church, but was to
ceafe in future Ages. For the Caufe and
End of the Gift of Miracles beflowed upon
the Apoflles, was to make them capable of
being Witnejfes to Chrift; ,• and when the Go-
fpel of Chrift was fufficiently teftifled, there
could be no longer need of fuch a Power,
which was given to enable Men to bear Te-
ftimony to it. For what is once effectually
proved 'by fufficient Witnefles, is for ever
proved, and needs no. after Evidence, if this
Proof be preferved and tranfmitted down to
Pofierity. .The Power of Miracles continu-
ed till the Gofpel had been Preached not
only in Jerufalem, and in all Jttdea, and in Sa-
maria, but unto the utmofl Parts of the Earth;
which .was the declared -Intention of our
Saviour in bellowing ic, Afts i. 8. And' when
the Gofpel had Hood at the Tryals^ and
con-
of the Clmjlian Religicft. 493
conquered all the Oppofition that could be
madeagainft it by Jews, and. Heathens, and
Apoftates themfelves ; when Miracles had
been wrought for feveral Ages, before all
iorts of Men, upon all Occafions, and had
extorted a Cpnfeflion from the Devils them-
selves of the Divine Power, by which they
were wrought ; when the Books of the Apo-
ftles and Evangelifts, in which thefe Mira-
cles are Recorded, had been difperfed in all
Nations and Languages, fo that it was im-
poflible that the Memory of them mould be
loft ; whence once the Gofpel was thus di-
vulged and attefted to the World, it could
not be neceflary that this miraculous Power
fhould be any longer continued : Becaufe
this is the only Realbn and Defign why Mi-
racles mould be wrought, to awaken Mens
Attention, and prepare them for the Recep-
tion of the Doctrin which is revealed,- and
convince them of the Truth of it.
If then it be enquired, Why the miracu-
lous Gifts, which were at firft beflow'd upon
the Church, were not continued to it in all
fucceeding Ages ? The plain Anfwer is ; Be-
caufe this Power was beflowed for the Ena-
blement of the Chriftian Religion in the
World , by convincing Men of its Truth
and Authority; and therefore, when a fuf-
ficient Evidence had been given in all Parts
of the World, of the Divine Authority of
that Religion, upon the Account whereof
thefe
494 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
thefe Gifts were bellowed, the Reafbn for
the bellowing of them muft ceafe, and the
Reafon why they mould bebeftowed ceafing,
theie miraculous Gifts muft * of confequence
ceale with it.
And thus it was likewife under the Law.
It is obfervable, that we read of no mira- *
culous Power beftowed upon any Man be-
fore Mofes. The Creation of the World was
dilivered down with undeniable Certainty,
and the miraculous Judgments of God in
Drowning the Old World, in the Confu-
fion of Tongues, and in the Puniftiment in-
flicted upon Sodom and Gomorrah were fuffici-
ent to keep up a Senfe of the True Religion.
But when a new Inflitution of Religion was
to be introduced by Mofes, miraculous Qifts
were neceilary to give Authority to it, and
to oppofe thofe falfe and lying Wonders
which were in ufe among the Magicians in
Egypt and other Places. In the former Ages
Predictions were very frequent, and they were
delivered by the Patriarchs, who were Men
of unqueflionable Credit and Authority, and
could have no need of Miracles to confirm
the Truth of their Prophecies, Which were
fb ufual in thofe Times ,• and when the Lives
of Men were fo long, divers Prophecies of
the fame Perlbns had been verified by the
Event. But Mofes had a New Law to de-
liver, and both He and the Prophets had a
a flubborn People to deal with, to whom the
Meflage,
of the Cbrijlian Religion. 59 J
MefTage they were charged withal, was
commonly very unwelcome; fo that till
this Inftitution was fully fettled, Miracles
became neceflary.
But when the Old Teftament had been
fufficiently authorized and eftablifhed by
Prophecies and Miracles, and when by the
Captivities and Difperfions of the Jews, the
Divine Million of their Prophets became
known among fo many other Nations ; when
the Jews were reduced from Idolatry, which
they never pra&ifed after their Return from
their Captivity in Babylon ; and when they
had made numerous Gonverfions amongft
the Heathens, then thefe miraculous Gifts
were no longer continued, as they had been
before, in the Jewijh Church, inibmuch that, ,r. , f
it became a (a) Maxim among them, thatGk«££
after the Death of Zechariah and Malachi, »/Exod.§,
and the reft of the Prophets, who returned ,/^T*
from Babylon, the Spirit of God departed van& .
ftomrlfrael and afcended ; and for above Four ^*k j4.
hundrid Years together the Gifts, both ofii. x».
Prophecy and Miracles, had been with-held
from them, before the Manifeftation of
Chrift. For though there were grofs Er-
rours, and dangerous Corruptions among
the Than fees and Sadducees, and other Sedts
of the Jews ; yet fmce the Truth and Cer-
tainty of that Revelation, from whence thefe
Errours might have been confuted, had
been lb throughly confirmed ; all their Cor-
ruptions
Ag6 Tlje Reafonablenefs and Certainty
ruptions and Errors were not a fufficient
caufe for the continuance of miraculous Gifts ;
and the Pharifees and other Seels, who
were mod fond and zealous of their feveral
Tenets and Traditions, yet never durft pre-
tend to a Power of Miracles, or Prophecy ;
but endeavoured to fupport themfelves up-
on the Authority of Mofes, and the Prophets.
(b) id. Fail What they fometimes fpake of (b ) the Bath
IX Harm ^» or Voice fr°m Heaven, deierves but lit-
tf th n. tie Credit, and amounts but to a Confeftion ;
tyyttt ^iac t^ie spirit of Prophecy had failed under
the Second Temple, as the Jews themfelves
fc)Moreexprefsly acknowledge it to have done, (c)
Nevock. Malmonides declares, that the Bath Col did
36, 41 .' not denominate Men Prophets, and therefore
it is not reckoned by him among the De-
grees of Prophecy.
B>d. t. I have already Proved at large, that the
Evidence of thofe Miracles, which, were
wrought in the Primitive Times, affords as
much certainty to our Faith, as if. we our
felves had leen them wrought., -And our
Saviour plainly lays, notwithstanding his
Works , which bore Witnefs of him, that it
was not to be expected, that his own Words
fhould be rather believed than the VVri-
tings of Mofes. For had ye believed Mofes,
ye woidd have believed me ; fir he wrote of me.
But if ye believe not his VP'ritings^ how /hall
ye believe my VTords } Joh. v. 46, 47. And
when once the G of pel had been attcftcd by
Miracles
of the Christian Religion. 497
Miracles as the Law had been, and rendred
as certain to all fucceeding Ages, as a con-
ftant Power of Miracles could have made it,
there could be no Reafon, why foch a Power
fhould be any longer beftowed. Miracles
were wrought in Evidence of the Truth of
Revelations made to Mankind in the Old
and New Teftament, not to decide any Con*
troverfies arifing amongft thofe, by whom
the Scriptures are received : For to whom
the Scriptures are the Rule, by which all
Difputes ought to be determined, and there-
fore the Gifts of Miracles were fometimes
manifefted among (d) Hereticks for the.Con-(^AdOr*
virion of Infidels, which is tile true end thodox.
and defign of Miracles, and not to be any ^InUta*
Note of Diflinclion between the Orthodox tyr.bper.
and Hereticks. Refponf.
The learned (?) M.r.Dodwe//,by an hiftorica! (e) injrem
Account of Miracles from the Times of the nae.DifTert
Apoftles through the Ages next fucceeding* JJjj* a8,
has fhewn, that they were always adapted
to the Neceffities of the Church, being more
or lefs frequent, as the State of the Church
required, till they at laft. wholly eeafed,
when the*re was no longer any need of them.
For the only end and ufe of miraculous Gifts
is the Confirmation and Eftablifhment of
Religion, and therefore when this is once
fully confirmed and eftablifhed, they can be
no longer needful. But it feems rather ne-
ceilary that they ihould afterwards ccafe,
K k than
49 8 The Reasonableness and Certainty
than that they fhould be continued ; I mean,
as to any conllant Power of working Mi*
racles residing in the Church. For tho' there
may poffibly be fome extraordinary Cafes,
in which it may pleafe God to manifeft a
miraculous Power, yet there is no Reaion
to conclude that a conftant Power of wor-
king Miracles fhould be continued to the
Church, but rather that thofe Gifts mould
ceafe, when Religion has been confirmed by
a perpetual Courfe of Miracles for fome
Hundreds of Years together. Becauie
I. Miracles, when they became common,
would lofe the defign and end, and the very
Nature of Miracles. For the Nature of Mi-
racles confifts in this, that they are an ex-
traordinary Work of God ; not that they
are more difficult, than the ordinary works
of Nature : All things are alike eafy to God,
and Miracles are as eafy as any thing in the
conftant courfe of Nature can be ; the only
difference is, that Miracles are his wonder-
ful Work, they are more apt to raife our
Wonder and Admiration, and to put us in
mind of a Divine Prcfence. For we wonder
at flrange and unufual things, and fuppole
a more than ordinary Real on for them. But
if Miracles had continued in all Ages, this
Efrecl: of Miracles would have ceafed, and
they would no longer have been Miracles,
but a kind of different Courfe of Nature.
For, according to the belt and molt accurate
Philofophy,
of the Chrifiian Religion. ^.pp
Philolbphy, nothing in the fettled Courfe of
Nature can be performed without an imme-
diate Influence of the Divine Power ; but in
Miracles this Power manifefts its felf in an
extraordinary manner, above and contrary
to the Eftablifhed Laws, or Rules, which
God has in all other cales prefcribed for the
producing Effects.
II. Men would fancy to themfelves ibme
kind of Scheme, or other, and would frame
fome Notions and Conceits to give an Ac-
count of Miracles ; or they -would imagin
them to return of Courfe at certain Periods,
or upon fome Accidents, if they faw them
frequently done, or perhaps they would fup-
pofe them to proceed from fome Defecl; in
the Nature of Things, which could not al-
ways keep its courfe, but made many De*
viations from it. But when Miracles were
wrought only in fome Ages for peculiar
Reafons, this mews that they were done by
an immediate Divine Power, with a particu-
lar Defign, which could be no other, than
the Confirmation of Religion, fince they
ceafed both under the Law and the Gofpel,
when both were fully declared and con-
firmed.
III. A perpetual Power of Miracles in all
Ages would give occafion to continual Im-
poflures, which would confound and di-
Itrad Mens minds, and would make the
true Mircles themfelves fufpcfted. We fee
K k z now
5 OOv The Bejfonablcnefs and Certainty
now that the Dreams of every Enthu-
fiaft, and the Pretences of every Impoftor
are apt to ftartle weak minds, tho' we h^ve
ib much Reafon not to expect Miracles, or
Revelations. But if we were in conftant
expectation of True Miracles, the Falfe
would be much more likely to miflead ma-
ny, and to make others reject the Belief of
any Miracles at all.
If Prophecies and Miracles had been fre-
quent in the Jewi/b Church to the coming
of our Saviour, his Prophecies and wonder-
ful Works had not fo well diftinguifhed and
manifeftcd him to be the Chrift. But when af-
ter fo long an IntermifTion, they were a-
gain revived in him, this (hewed him to be
the great Prophet and Mejjias who was ex-
pected. And it is very obfervable, that as
Miracles had been dilcontinued for a •long
time among the Jews ; lb St. John Baptzjt,
who Was more than a Prophet, and one of the
greateft of all the Men that had been before
him; yet wrought no Miracles, that he
might be the better diftinguiihed from the
Mejjias, and that there might arife no doubt
in the Minds of any, which of them was
the Chrift. And when our Saviour had
been acknowledged to be the Chrift in all
Parts of the World, it was fit that Miracles
Ihould ceale, to preferve the Authority due
to the Miracles wrought by himfelf, and his
Difupies, it being more for the Honour of
' Chrift,
of the Chrflian Religion. 501
Chrifr, that the Miracles wrought in his
Name mould ceafe, when his Religion had
been fully Eftablifhed, than that Men mould
be tempted to doubt who was the true
Chrift, and which was the true Religion,
upon the account of falfe Miracles wrought
in opposition to the True.
IV. Another Reafon why the Gift of Mi-
racles has been with-held in latter Ages may
be this ; becaufe fince there has been a general
depravation of Manners among Chriftians,
it would have proved a great occafion of
Pride and Vain-Glory to thole who had pol-
feftit, as we find it was to fome even in
the times of the Apoftles, .1 Cor. xii. xiv.
And our Saviour faw it requifite to give
Caution to his Dilciples, Notwithftand- '
ing in this rejoice not, that the Spirits are
jubjecl unto you, but rather rejoice, becaufe
your Names are written in Heaven, Luke x.
20. It muft be an eminent and truly Pri-
mitive Piety, that could bear the having of
fuch Gifts with an humble and Christian
Temper of Mind.
V. It is an Obfervation of (f) my Lord (f) Advm.
Bacons, That there was never Miracle wrought ?£***•
by God to Convert an Atheift, becaufe the Light
of Nature might have led him to confefs a. God :
But Miracles are defgned to Convert Idolaters,
and the Superftitious, who have acknowledged a
Deity, hut erred in his Adoration ; becaufe no
Light of Nature extends to declare the Will
Kk 3 and
502 The 'Reasonableness and Certainty
and true Worfkip of God. For the fame Rea-
Ion, when once the true Religion is confirm-
ed in fuch a manner, as to have the fame
Evidence for it, which there is for the Exi-
gence of God himfelf, Miracles are no more
to be expected to convert an Infidel, than
to convert an Atheift. Among Men of
Learning and Reafon there ought to be no
more doubt of the Truth of the Gofpel, than
of the Being of a God, and they without the
(g) De help of Miracles may inftrucl: others, (g) A-
I rdCUrSa- cofta enclmrnig mto tne Caufe, why Miracles
lute. ub. are not wrought by the prefent Miffionaries
ii. e. 9. for the Converfion of Heathen Nations, as
they were by. the Chriftians of the Primi-
tive Ages, gives this as one Reafon, be-
• caufe the Chriftians at firft were ignorant
Men, and the Gentiles learned ; but now on
the contrary all the Learning in the World is
employ 'd for the Defence of :he Gofpel, and
there is nothing but Ignorance to oppofe it ;
and there can be no need of farther Miracles
in behalf of fo good a Caufe, when it is id
the Hands of fuch able Advocates, againfl ib
weak Adverfaries.
However, though there be no fuch change
as was wont formerly to be wrought in the
vifible Courfe of Nature, in Confirmation of
our Religion, yet there is flill a Divine .
Power evident among 'Chriftians living in
Heathen Countries. For the Devil, who
tyrannized* over thefHcathens, has no Pow-
er
of the Chrijlian Religion. 503
cr over Chriftians dwelling among them ;
of which the Indians have taken great No-
tice, and have (h) declared the Chriftians^) Lerii
happy in being freed from the Tortures of Navig! in
Wicked Spirits; by which they find them-Brafii.
felves often feized on the fudden in a ter- c' l6'
rible manner, and ft and in perpetual fear of
them, (i) Chriftians ^ they do acknowledge^1') Capt.
have a Prerogative above them/elves^ and not H^aXQef
to be under the Tower of thefe Infernal SpiritsXsylon,
It is fo generally related by Travellers of aUp*r' lu*
Profeflions, both Proteftants and Papifts,
that the Devil exercifes a manifeft Tyranny
over the Heathens, but is able to do nothing
to the Chriftians abiding amongft them ;
that this cannot be denied to be a plain Ar-
gument of a Divine Power dilcovering it felf
in Confirmation of the Chriftian Religion,
though not by fuch Miracles as were former-
ly wrought, becaufe there is no longer any
need of them.
Kk 4 CHAR
jo^j. The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
CAHP. XXX
Of the Caufes why the Jews and Gentiles
rejected Chrift5 notwithjianding all the
Miracles wrought by Him and his A-
les.
T Hough the Chriftian Religion be mofl
certain in it felf, yet there is a Super-
natural Grace required to make us through-
ly and effectually convinced of the certainty
of it. No Man can come to we, fays our Sa-
viour, except the Father, which hath fent me,
draw him .- and this is declared to be the
Reafon of the Infidelity of fuch as were of-
fended at his Dodtrin, and departed from
him. But there are fome of you that believe
not ; for Jefus knew from the beginning who they
were that believed not ; and who fhould betray
him ; and he faid, Therefore /aid I unto you,
that no Man can come unto me, except it be
given unto him of my Father, John vi. 64, 65'.
So that the Belief of the Gofpel is filled a
Divine Faith, not only in refpecl: of its Ob-
ject, but of its efficient Ca ufe. In attaining
to the Kno\^edge of the Truth of Religion,
we mujt proceed upon %h& fame Principles of
Reafon, by which we proceed in attaining
to the Knowledge of any other Truth. But
4 Reafpn,
of the Chrijlt an Religion. 50 5
Reafon, when it comes up to the Evidence
even of Demonftration, though it.fatisfies the
Underftanding, yet doth not neceflarily gain
that firm and lafting Aflent of the Will, which
is required in Faith ; but when the thing
proved to be true, is unacceptable, againft
the Inclinations of the Will, and againft the
former Opinions and Perfuafions of the Un-
derftanding, the prefent Convictions of the
Underftanding are foon ftifled and overpower-
ed by the prevailing Force of the Will and
Affections, which carry the Mind off to o-
ther and contrary Objects, which it has been
wont to think of and believe. Thus it was
in the Academkks and Scepttcks ; they could
not but have the fame fenfe of Mathematical
Demonftrations, and other clear Truths,
which the reft of Mankind have, whilft they
thought of them, and attended ftrictly to
them : But by a conftant Practice to amufe
themfelves with Subtilties, they had wrought
themfelves to a Perfuafion , that nothing
could be certainly known to be true ,• and
this general and habitual Opinion foon ftifled
the Evidence of any particular Truth, which
could be reprefented never lb clearly to their
Minds.
To as many therefore as lay under long
and violent Prejudices, by reafon of their
former Opinions, and of their Pride and
Vanity in contending for them ; or by
reafon of any of thole Lulls, which are fa
con-
$0 6 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
contrary to the Purity of the Gofpel; to
fuch, an extraordinary and miraculous Pow-
er of Grace was necetfary to eftablifh them
in the Faith, or elfe, though they belie-
ved for the prefent at the light of lome
Miracle, yet this was no lafting or well-
grounded Faith, John ii. 13, 24. And that
Grace, which was neceflary to their Faith,
was denied to fome for their Sins, that they
fhould not fie with their Eyes, nor underfland
with their Heart, and be converted, John
xii, 40. So that Men of great Learning and
worldly Wifdom might {till continue Unbe-
lievers, and not fubmit to all the Evidence of
the Gofpel, becaufe the Do&rin of the Go-
fpel being fo contrary to their Habitual
Thoughts and Inclinations, there was fome-
thing neceflary to convert the Will and Af-
fections, and to lubdue the former Habits
which had been rooted in their Minds by fre-
quent Acls and length of Time, and which
were too ftrong for any Convictions of the
Underftanding, that confided but in tran-
fient A&s, and were foon loft and vaniflied,
through the prevailing contrary Habits both
of the Underftanding, and Will, and Affe-
ctions. And therefore Faith muft ncceflarily
be an etlcd; of Grace as well as of Realbn ;
and where, becaufe of former Sins and Provo-
cations, this Grace was not vouchfafed, there
could be no Faith, though there might be
ibme tranfient Convictions of Mind, ibme
faint
of the Chrijiian 'Religion, 507
faint Glimmerings, which were foon damped
and extinguiihed, being overpowered by for-
mer contrary Perfuafions. And for the fame
Reafon, thofe who had left Wifdom and
Knowledge, but were not under the Power
of Habitual Lulls and Paffions, and therefore
were more eafily perfuaded to any thing, of
the Truth whereof they were once convinced,
were like wife the more eafily converted.
The Caufes why the Word became un-
fruitful, and fo little prevailed with many
Men, are in the Parable of the Some r declared
to be either inconfiderate Negligence and Ig-
norance, and the Advantage taken from thence
by Satan, or want of Conftancy in Times of
Tribulations and Perfections, or the Cares of
this World, and the Deceitfulnefs of Richesy
and the Lufts of other things, Matth. xiii. 18.
Mark iv. 9. It was next to an impossibility
for a rich Man to enter into the Kingdom of
God, or to become a Chriflian. They were
not Natural fo much as Moral Accompliih-
ments, not fo much Parts and Learning, as
an honeft and humble Mind, which were
the requ'fite Qualifications for Men to be-
come Chriflians : Becaufe as God the more
freely beftowed his Grace upon Men thus
qualified, fo they were the better difpofed
to be wrought upon by it ; whereas others,
though they wanted a greater meaiure of
Grace, yet had lefs vouchiafed to them. For
God reftjhth the Proudy hut giveth Grace to the
Hamlk* Thus
508 The Reafonabfaiefs and Certainty
Thus much in the General, I now proceed
to give a particular Account of the Cauies
of the Unbelief both of the Jews and Gen-*
tiles.
I. Since there is fo great Evidence, that
our Saviour is the true Chrifl, it may feem a
wonderful and almoft an incredible thing,
that the Jews Ihould fo generally reject him,
notwithflanding all the Means and Oppor-
tunities which they had above other Nations
of being converted. But,
i. The Jews and Profelytes were convert-
ed in vaft Numbers. Befides the Shepherds,
Simon and Anna the Prophetefs acknowledg-
ed and adored our Saviour in his Infancy, as
the true Meffia^ Luke ii. 15", 36. and it is
(k) Bux- probably (k) iuppofed that this was Rabban
Abbrtv. Simeofty the Son of Hillel, and Father of 6 a-
Hebr. tnaliel. The Title of Rabban was the high-
eft of all Titles, signifying a Prince rather
than a Doctor or Teacher, as Rabbi doth ,•
and there were but Seven of the Pofterity of
Hillel who were dignified with it. Nicade-
mm, Jofeph of Arimathca, and many others
of Note and Eminency received the Chriftian
Faith. About Three fhoufand were converted
at one time, Atts ii. 41. Great Numbers were
converted not only of the People, but of the
Priefts alio, Atls vi. 7. All that dwelt at
Lydda and Saron^ Acts ix. 35-. Many of the
Jews and Religious Profelytes followed PauH and
Barnabas, Acts xiii. 43. At Iconium a great
multitude
• of the Chrijlian Religion. 509
multitude of the jews believed, A£ts xiv. 1.
Crifpus, Chief Ruler of the Synagogue, believed
on the Lord with- all his Houfe, Adts xviii. 8.
And Softhenes, another Chief Ruler of the Sy-
nagogue, Acts xviii. 19. 1 Cor. i. 1. Apollos an
eloquent Man, and mighty in the Scriptures,
was a Chriftian, Alls xviii. 2,4. Many thou-
fands (or Myriads in the Greek,) ^j-xxi.20.
And the number of them which were Jealed,
Was an Hundred and forty and four thoufand of
all the Tribes of the Children of Ifrael, Rev.
vii. 4. The People were generally well-dif-
pofed to receive the Gofpel ,* and when the
Chief Pnefts and Rulers would have Perfe-
cuted our Saviour and his Apoftles, they
were often forced to defift for fear of the Peo-
ple. And if the Apoftles did not depart (/) (/; Eufefc,
from Jerufalem in the fpace of Twelve Years Sift- Hg-
( as there is Reafon to believe,) the number
of Converts in all that time mud needs be
extreamly great. The Church of Jerufalem
flourifhed exceedingly from the Beginning,
and the Bifhops of that City were of the Na-
tion of the Jews for (m) Fifteen Succefllons, (*») Id .lib.
even to the final deftru&ion of it by Hadrian. ^ *•*
Many of the Rulers being converted, thever.iib. "
Scribes and Pharisees made their Complaints11, €"U-
that the whole City of Jerufalem would turn
Christians, as in) Hegefippus informs us ,• and (n) EufeK
the Pharifees faid of our Saviour, when he |r '^mltm
was upon Earth, Behold the World is gone after
him, John xii. 19. The Epiftles of St. Peter
and
501 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
and St. James, and chat of St. Paul to the FJe-
brews, purpofely dire&ed to the Jews and
Ifraelites, (hew that their Converfions were
very numerous both in Judea and in other
■{>) Eufeb. Countries, (o) Eujebius takes. particular no-
li^ p^.tjee of the Multitudes of Believing Jews in
the Bifhoprick of Jerufalem, when Jujhs the
Third Bifhop iucceeded to that
•ftheplhnit^Go'vtrnment ScC. And (p) at Antkch, and
*/ churches, c. 5. *»^ Dr. Rome , and Ephejus- there was one
SSZlrt&ft" Bilhop of the converted ?«», and
another of the Gentiles, and, as
Dr. Hammond fuppoies, at Jerufalem like-
wife, but there is little Proof of *t. And
fome of the mod Learned Jews have been
converted not only in theie Times, but in
latter Ages. Epiphanius was brought up in
the Jewiih Religion, as the Greek Menology
(?) Epi- certifies, and he acquaints us, that (y) File/
Hse"' 30 thejewifh Patriarch lent for a Biihop co Bap-
n. 4. tize him upon his Death-Bed. Samuel Moro-
chianus, Petrus Aiphonjus, Paulus Burgenfis,
Nicolas de Lyra, Petrus Galathnu, Treme/lius,
and other Learned Men educated in the Jew-
iih Worfhip, upon their Converfion have been
eminent Defenders of the Chriflian Religion.
F/ieronymus- a S. Fide, after his Converfion,
is laid to have brought over many Thoufands
to Chrifhanity.
And the Samaritans as well as the Jews be-
lieved, and were baptized both men and women,
even Simon Magus himfelf, Afts viii. 12, 13.
2. Many,
of the Chrifiian 'Religion. 5 1 1
2. Many eve 11 among the Chief Rulers were
convinced that Jefus is the Chrift, who durfl
not own him, Job. xii. 42. 43. But the
Love of Riches, and the Praife of Men, made
them diflemble their Convictions, and Act:
againfl their Conferences, as we fee too
many amongfl us Act againfl their own
Knowledge, and avowed Principles, every
day.
3. Many had Blafphemed the Holy
Ghofl, and thereby rendred themfelves un-
capable of the Mercies of the Gofpel ; and
others by their other great Impieties, had
brought them to fuch an Impenitent flate ;
that their Eyes were blinded, and their Ixarts
hardned , that they fhould not fee with
their Eyes, nor underfland with their Hearty
and he converted, Job. xii. 40. Aft. xxviii. 25.
Rom. xi. 8. And this feems to have been one
Reafon, why Chrift commanded his Difci-
ples to conceal his Perlbn, and to fay no-
thing of his. Transfiguration till his Refur-
rection, Matt, xvi. 20. xvii. 9. that he might
difcover himfelf by degrees, and that the
Jews might gradually be prepared to Ac-
knowledge him, and not Sin, beyond all pof-
fibility of Converfion, before his Refurre-
ction, and the manifeftation of the Power
of the Holy Ghofl in the Apoflles, which
was the lafl means of Salvation, and thofe,
who rejected this, were Self-condemned, and
judged themjehes unworthy of ever lading Life,
« Aft.
j i 2 The Reasonableness and Certainty
Aft. xiii. 46. or, in effect, they denounced
the Sentence of Damnation againil them.
4. The Jews had violent Prejudices againft
the Gofpel out of Zeal to their Law, and to
their Traditions, which were in fo much fi-
fteen} and Veneration amongft them, they
feared that their Believing in Chrift might
prove an occafion to the Romans to come
and deftroy them. If we let him thus alone,
all Men will believe on bimy and the Romans
fhall come, and take away loth our Flace and
Nation , Jo. xi. 48. And to prevent this, the
Chief Pricfts, and the Pharilees, in Council
agreed to the Expedient propoicdl by Caia-
phasy of putting Chrift to death, imagining
that would effectually put a flop to the fprea-
ding of his Doctrin among the People, whoj
above all things, could not endure to hear
of Chrift Crucified; for they had ?eneral and.
earnefl Expectations of a temporal Mejjias,
whom not only their own carnal Hearts inclin-
ed them to hope for, but their Religion, as
they imagined, commanded them to expeel:.
And the Family of the famous Hi lie I being
in fo much Power and Authority at that
time, might be a great inducement to them,
to confirm them in their hopes, and to har-
den them againfl the Belief of a Crucified
f-)Lightf.A&?$ftfi. F°r (/) M-iOel himfelf held the Go-
Hebr. & vcrnmcnt, or Prefidentiliip, of the Sanhedrim
uircit.in Forty Years, and his Son and Grandfons af-
Matt.ir.i ter him in a continual Succe/Tion, for an
Hundred
of the Cbrijlian Religion. j I j
Hundred Years before the Deftrudtion of
Jerufalem : So that rfe Splendor and Pomp of
this Family oitHillel, fays Dr. Laghtfeotf
had fb obfcured 'the reft of the Families of
L?aroicl\ Stock, that perhaps they believed,
or expected the lei's, that the Meffias mould
fpring from any of them ; and one of their
Rabbins^ in the Babylonian Gemara, was al*
mod perfliaded, that Rabbi Judah, of the
Family of Hi//el, was indeed the Meffias,
They were all very unwilling to find him in
fb low and afflicted a Conation, when the
Luftre of this Family had for fo long a time
attrad^d their Sight and Expectation; info-
much that Rabban Simeon, the Son of Hillel^
is but flightly mentioned, and not with that
Encomium, with which the reft of that Fami^
ly are wont to be Celebrated by the Jew:/fh-
Writers ; for this Reafon, Qg ) if Buxtoyj be (5)De Ab-
not miftaken, becaufe he was the fam^ Sime- breV-
on who declared our Saviour to be r^8e Chrift.Hebn
Tho' the Jews muft have b,<*en convin-
ced ( if they would have attended to them )
by all manner of other Meatus and Evidence,
that Jefus was the Meffias, yet they efteem-
eji Temporal Pomp and Orandeur lb efTenti-
al to the Perfon and Cx!ara&er of the Meffias,
that they thought the meannefs of our Savi-
our's Condition,. -and the Ignominy of his
Death, was fuPjdent to overthrow all the
Arguments w^ch they could poflibie have,
of his being the Chrift ; indeed their Minds
L 1 were
5 1 4 The 'Reasonableness and Certainty
were fo fixe upon this mifhken Indication,
that they little regarded any other.
This bred in them that Ignorance, which
was truly very culpable, but which yet \va,s
taken notice of in their Favour, as fome mi-
tigation of fo heinous a Crime, as the Cru-
cifying of the Son of God, Luke 23. 34.
Acl: 3. 17. 13. 27. 1. Cor. 11. 8. But with-
all it made them exceeding obflinate, and
Deaf to all the Arguments, that could be of-
fered to convince them. When St. Stephen-
hid anfwered their Accufations, and fully
argued the cafe ' with them, they gnajhed on
him, with their Teeth, and cried out with a
loud Voice, andftopt their Ears% and ran upon
him, and ft one d him A&. .7. 54 $ 7. And
when St. Paul had declared in all Particu-
lars, how he was converted, and appealed
to the High Prieft, and to the E ft ate of the
Elders, for the Truth in part of what he rela-
ted ; yet the People in a Rage and Tumult
lift up their Voices, and J aid, Away with fuch
a Fellow from the Earth, for it is not ft that
he fhouldlive ; they cried out, and c aft off their
Clothes, and threw dufl into the Air, Acl".
xxii. 22. 23. Thefe are not the Actions of
Reafonable Men, no wonder therefore, that
they were not convinced by Reafon.
5-. Falfe Chrifts and falfe Prophets, with
their Signs and Wonders, were then very fre-
quent, infomuch that if it had been poffihle,
they would have deceived the very Eletl, Matt.
xxiv.
of the Chriflian "Religion* 515
xxiv. 24. And the Jews were mnch more
enclined to give Credit to thefe, who com-
plied with their Lufls and Defires, than to
examine and confider the cleareft Evidence,
which mull: oblige them to take up the
Crofs, and follow a Crucified Saviour. The
Crofs of Chrift was to the Jews a fiumbling
Block, and they would believe any thing ra-
ther than it.
6. Upon thefe and fuch like Caules, the
Jews rejected their Mejjias9 and ftill continue
in Unbelief, whereby are fulfilled many Pro-
phecies concerning this very thing, and
whilft they endeavour in vain to diiprove
all other Arguments, their Infidelity and
Obftinacy it felf is an Argument againft
them, the Prophets having foretold that they
would thus reject their MeJJias as St. Paul
proves, Rom. ix. 27. And it was no new,
or ftrarlge thing, that the Jews lhould refift
the Holy Ghoft, they always did it, as St. Ste*
, phen tells them, as your Fathers did, [0 do ye-.
Which of the Prophets have not your Fa*
thers persecuted * And they have JIain them7
which Jhewed before of the Coming of the Juji
One, of whom ye have been now the Betrayers
and Murder erSy Aft. vii. 5*5-, 5-2.
II. What great Numbers of the Heathen
Nations, in all parts of the World, were
converted to the Chriftian Religion, is evi-
dent both from Chriftian and Heathen Au-
thors of thofe Ages, in which the Gofpel was
L 2 firft
V
5 1 6 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
firft Preached ; and conftdering the general
Depravation both of the Manners and Prin-
ciples of thofe Times, it is no wonder that
many mould be contented with any Religi-
on, or with no Religion at all, fo that they
might retain their Vices, rather than attend
to any Arguments, which could be brought
in proof of a Religion, that muft oblige
them to abandon and Crucify all their Lufts
and Sins, and renounce their Eafe and Safe-
ty, to live in Difgrsce and Mifery, and die
in Torments. However, notwithftanding
all thefe Dilcouragcmcnts, there was no
Rank, nor Order of Men, nor Seel of Phi-
lofophers, but divers of the beft and wifeft
of them were early Converts to the Chrifti-
an Faith, fuch as Dionyjfius the Areopagite ;
Jufiin Martyr, Athenagoras^ Tertulhan, Ar-
nobhiSy and others. And as nothing but the
clear Evidence and Force of Truth could
convert thefe, fo it is no unaccountable
thing, that others fhould ftand out and Op-
pofe it. For
I. The Greeks fought after IVif/om; they
were only for high and Subtil Speculations,
and were fo polled with their own- Notions,
and a Conceit of themfelves, that they would
give no Attention to a Company of igno-
rant Men, who told them a plain Truth of
one, that had been Crucified, and Role a-
gain from the Dead. Cbrifl crucified 'was unto
the Jews a Stumbling-Block, and unto the Greeks
Fiolijhhefs, i Cor. i. xz. 23. And
of the Chriflian Religion. 5 1 7
And the feveral Tenets of Philofophy then .
in Vogue, were a great obflru&ion to all
fuch, as thought themfelves skilled in them,
to hinder them from becoming Chriflians ;
and we find that fome of them after their
Converfion could not foon lay afide all their
Philofophical Notions. The Epicureans, a
confident and vain Seel, would receive no-
thing that could be faid to them of a Refur-
re&ion and another Life, but with Scorn
and Contempt : And fome faid, What will
this B abler fay ? And when they heard of the
Refurreclton of the Dead, fome mocked, A&S
xvii. 18, 32. The Platoniftsheld a Revolu-
tion of all Things into their former State, in
fome certain Term of Years, and therefore
they by their own Principles mufl look up-
on all only as aConfequence of fuch a Revo-
lution and a Period of Time. The Peripa-
teticks were perfuaded, that the World is
eternal, and therefore laught at thole who
feemed to them to teach that it was now
jufl at an end, and declared that it had a
Beginning not many Thoufands of Years be-
fore. The Stoicks, who mightily improved
the Moral Part of Philofophy, by borrow-
ing from the Chriflian Doclxin, yet hold-
ing that all Things are under an inevita-
ble Fate and Deftiny, had fuch a perpetual
curb upon them, as left them no Liberty to
think of changing their Opinions ; one of
which was that there is nothing Immaterial,
L 1 3 a plain
5 1 8 The Reafonab/enefs and Certainty
a plain Contradiction to the Fundamental
Doctrins of the Chriftian Religion.
Befides there was a great deal of Pride in
(') Arrj- the very Compofition of a Stoick. It (t) ap-
lib. iff. Pears fr°m tne Account which Arrian has
c. 7*. given of Ej>icctetusy that neither the Jewifli
Law, nor the Ghriftian Religion was un-
known to him ,• for in the Difcourfes which
he has prefer ved of Epitletus, we find him
fometimes ufing the fame words with* the
Scriptures. But it appears likewife from
thofe Dilcourles, that Epicletus was a great
Admirer of Diogenes the Cynick, and imita-
ted him in his Pride and Haughtinefs. For,
magnifying himfelf as one lent by God to be
an Example to the World, and to prove that
the high Sayings of the Stokks are not vain
Boafts, but real and pra&icable Truths, he
at lad thus concludes, " How do I converfe,
fays he, " with thefe Men, whom you fear
"and admire? Do not I treat them as
Slaves ? Who, when he fees me doth not
think he fees his King and his Matter ?
There could be little hope, that iuch a Man
fhould be wrought upon by a Religion which
enjoineth, That in lovolinefs of mind eich
efleem other letter than thevnfelves, Phil. ii. 3.
ty"a'*rTS!0 Seneca in fome places, writes as if he
vt" tecum had been tranferibmg the Scriptures, but he
r/?, intus
eji. It a dico, Lucili, facer intra nos fpin'tus ftdet, honorum, wa'.ornmqut
Hojirortm obfirvater & chJIqs, &c. SeneC- Epift. ^l.
is
of the Cbriftian 'Religion. yip
is not always the fame, and he likewife dis-
covers a ftrange Vanity' and Conceit of him-
felf and his own Writings. For citing a Paf-
fage of Epicurus y where he told his Friend,
That if he defired Glory, his Letters mould
make him more famous than all thofe things
which he cfteemed, or for which he was
eftcemed. (a) Seneca aflures Lt*ciliusy That (*) Epifh
he could promife him as much as Epiturus**'
had done his Friend : For he mould be Fa-
mous in future Times ,• and could raife and
perpetuate the Fame of whomfoever he plea-
fed.
The Pythagoreans were a fuperftitious Sect,
and were apt to alcribe all to Magick ; and
.befides they had given themfelves up by a
blind Obedience to their Mailer's Dictates,
and therefore were to regard no Realbns nor
Arguments againfl them. Infhort, thePhi-
lolbpers were all exceedingly prepoffeft and
prejudiced by fome peculiar Opinions of
their own, befides the general Prejudices,
which they lay under with the reft of the
World. And all Men of any Learning and
Education ftudied the Books of the Philofo-
phers, and were commonly addicted to one
Se£t or other.
It muft be confeft, that Vanity and the
Praife of Men was the chief* aim of many
of the Philofophers , as Tertullian and
others of the Fathers object, a*d therefore
ihey were very unlikely to become Profe-
L 1 4 lytes
520 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
Jytes ro a Religion, which was looked upon
in the World with fuch Difdain and Con-
tempt. Philofophy in general, if we believe
0) Inftit. (y) Quintiluny was in his time by mofl ufed
h as an Artifice and Difguife to conceal the
word of Vices under a morofe Look, and a
Habit different from that of other Men.
And from fuch Philofophers as thefe we mult
expfcet that the Scriptures lhould be read
With no manner of Candor, or good and fe-
(7) Con- rious Intention. (z) Origen gives lnftances
fib.fi? of the wilful Abufe'of the Scriptures by fome
of his Time, who cavilled at half Sentences,
Without taking notice of the Coherence
which they have of the reft. And he com-
(*) lb. plains that Qi) Celjus fecmed never to have
^ **' read the Scriptures, though he pretended to
a very exact Knowledge both of the Jewifli
and Chriftian Religion, but underitoocf little
of either. (P) /ithenagorasy who
(0 Philip. Sider. a- pefore fam uac| reac[ die Scriptures
pud Dodw. Append. . f . r • ■ i >
ad Diffcrt. in iren$. e. With more care and lincerity, tno
Cod, MS. Baroc. wjth t}ie fame Defigti, became
converted, and wrote in Defence
of that Religion which he inten-
() Eufeb. contr. Hier. - ^d to Oppofe. (c) Hierccles like-
^Laftanr.Inftirut.lib. •, 1 J J 1 *r -T (l
V. c 2,i- DeMortib, wife had read the New left amen t
Perfecuc. c if with a defign to write againft it,
but he who could believe the
Miracles pf Apollwius 7yaneus, and prefer that
notorious Jmpoftor to our Blefled Saviour,
.mdJWa£imp<s &gie*lisa Dams the Philoibphcr,
of the Chrijlian Religion. 521
and fhiloftratus to St. Peter and St. Paul,
mews fo ftrange a partiality as might be ex-
pected only in him, who oppofed the Chri-
stian Religion b*y his Perfections more than
by his Arguments ; for Hierocles was the
chief promoter of the Perfecution under Dio-
cletian.
2,. The Gentiles looked upon the poor
perfecuted Condition of the Chriftians as an
Argument againft their Religion, and were
not only prejudiced againft a New Religion
which muft expofe them to Sufferings, by
that fbndnefs which Men naturally have for
their own Eafe and Safety, but (V) when 00 Aug.
they faw the Chriftians in Diftrefs they would f^^1
upbraid them, as the Pfalmift's Enemies re- 29.
proached him, faying, Where is now thy God>
They confidered their own Religion as the
Religion of their Country, and of their An-
cestors, which was what Tully faid for it,
when he ruined all the Grounds and Preten-
ces in behalf of it. ^They alleged that this
had been the Religion of their Forefathers,
and that the Roman Empire had arrived to
fo much Power and Greatnefs under its In-
fluence. This was fo much inllfted upon,
as is to be feen in Zofwus, Sjmmachus and
others, that Orojius fet himfelf to aniwer it in
2 particular Work, and St. Auflin^ who put!
him upon Writing it, thought himfelf con-
cerned in his own Works to oppofe fo un-
reafonable, but fatal a Prejudice.
3. The
5 2 S The 'Reasonableness and Certainty
3. The Confequcnce of thefe Prejudices
againft the Chriftian Religion, both in Fa-
vour to the Religion of their Country, and
in Fondnefs for their old Opinions, and out
of an Abhorrence of Afflictions, and a Dis-
regard of thofe, who were lb much expoied
to them, as having but fmall pretence to any
part of the Divine Care ; the Confequence,
I fay, of thefe Errors and Prejudices was,
that the Gentiles defpifed the Chriftian Re-
ligion before they underftood any thing of
it. For many Men of Learning and Obfer-
vation were lb little acquainted with it, that
they did not diftinguifh Chriftians from
^jSuetonjewSj as we fee ^ ^ Suetonius. They
dio c. 2*5. knew not fo much the true Pronunciation of
the Name of Chrift, ox.Chrijliany
(f) M?*""**™™ but were wont to write (f) Chre-
certs ejt notttia penes 110s. n> ^1 ■ 1
Tertul. ApoLc.3. Sue- ftus and Qhrejtianus. This the
ton. ib. Laftant. Lib. Apolo0s mucn infifb upon, that
they condemned and perfecuted
what they did not underftand, the Chri-
flians defired no more than a fair Hear-
ing, and if they might but be iuffered to
make their Religion fully known to their
Adverfaries, they begged no further Fa-
vour.
U) Aug. 4. It was believed Q;) that the Heathen
DePub ^rac^cs had delivered, that the Chriftian
XVIII. Religion mould continue no longer than
c- 53,54- Three hundred and fixty five Years, and it
is obfervablc that Julian the Apoftate died
A.D.
of the Cbrijiian Religion. 523
J. D. CCCLXV. according to fome Chro-
nologers, tho' others place his Death Two
Years before. It feems the Devil had fome
great Expectation from his Reign, but at or
near that very time, in which he had foretold
that the Chriftian Religion fhould have an end
(if the Computation were to be made from
the Nativity of Chrift:) he faw an end of all
his hopes in the Death of that Emperor, who
was fo zealous in his Service, and had given
out fevere Threatnings againft the Chriftians
of what they were to expedt, if he had re-
turned victorious from that Expedition in
which he perifhed. And this Prediction had
refpecl: probably to his Reign, though the
Greek Verfes in which it was delivered might
be altered afterwards, or fo contrived at
firft,- as to extend it to a longer time, lea-
ving it uncertain from whence the Calcula-
tion was to begin. However this Oracle
kept many of the Gentiles from being Chri-
ftians, till they faw the time paft, which
they fuppofed to be meant by it, as St. Au-
(lin aflures us.
5. The Herefies and Schifms which foon
arofe in the Church, gave great Scandal and
Offence to fuch, as judged of thefe things at
a diftance, and in the grofs, without exami-
ning into the Occafions of them. The (b)(b)JuR.
Jews not only Blafphemed chrift in ^ohh''
Synagogues, but made choice of Men on
purpofe, whom they fent from Jerufalem in-
to
524 The Reafomblenefs and Certainty
to all Parts of the World to yilifie him and
(J) H- his Religion. (/) And becaufe Chriflians
p * fpoke of Cbrifis Kingdom, this was under-
uood to their Prejudice, as if they had been
for fetting up a Temporal Kingdom by Re-
bellion. And the evil Doctrins and Practices
of divers Hereticks confirmed Men in any ill
Opinion, which they had conceived of Chri-
flians in general. The abfurd Doctrins and
Herefies of the Gnoftkks and other Hereticks,
were by the Enemies of the Gofpel in their
Cenfures and Invectives applied to all Chri-
ftians without difbnction, and were taken
(k) Orig. upon Trull by mod Men. (£) Celjus makes
conc.Ceif. Objections from the erroneous and wicked
.6,7,8. Motions and Practices of the Ophita, the Va-
lentinians, the Marcionites and others. This
caufed the Chriflians in their Apologies to
preis earneflly for a fair and impartial Hear-
ing of their Caufe, befeeching their Enemies
that they would not be fo injurious to the
Truth and to themfclves, as to defpife and
condemn what they did not underftand :
They were defirous to undergo any Tryal,
if they might -but be admitted to be heard.
6. Yet many, who did not actually be-
come Chriftians, had more favourable and
jufl Thoughts of the Chriftian Religion.
(/) Ml (I) Alexander Severus had the Effigies of
1 aSx?" cljrift m nis Chappel, and had defigned to
Scvcro. erect a Temple for the Worfhip of him, and
to infert his Name among the Heathen Gods.
As
of the Chriftian Religion. 525
As it is reported, that Adrian likewife with
the fame Intention had commanded Temples
to be built without Images in all Cities, but
was dhTuaded by fome, who -confulted the
Oracles about it, which gave out, that all
Men would then become Chriftians, and the
other Temples would foonbe forfaken. This,
which is related concerning Adrian, has been
by fome fuppofed to be a miftake, becaule
the Fathers fay nothing of it. But /EL Lam-
pridius (or rather Spartianus) who mentions
it, being a Heathen, might perhaps have it
from the Gentiles, for it was only in Adrians
Intention, to fet up the Worihip of Chrifr,
which might be unknown by the Chriftians
of his time, the defign being laid afideupon
confulting the Oracles. It was certainly re-
ported in the Hiftorian's time, as he declares,
and yet this Objection lies as well againft
the Report as againft the Reality of the
thing : For it is ftrange that a Report of this
nature mould be mentioned by no Chriftian
Writer, though there had been no Truth in
it. (m) /Emiliamts the Prcfecl of Egypt ask- (**) Eufeb
ed Dionyfws, Bifhop of Alexandria, whenSij* ^
he was brought before him, why, if he,
whom the Chriftians Worfhipped, be God,
they could not Worihip him with the other
Gods ? Many admired the Do&rin, and were
convinced of the Truth" of the Chriftian Re-
ligion, who could not free themlelves from
the Prejudices of their Education ; they
would
J 16 Tlie Reafonablenefs and Certainty
would have been willing to have it taken in
among others, but could not bring them-
felves to relincmifh all their old Religions for
it. The Calumnies raifed againft the Chri-
flians had caufed the popular Odium and Rage
againft them, but they were Vindicated by
fb X ' E-^ ^^ m" an ^P^^e to T^ra)a^y by Serenius
pift.97. Granianus Proconful of Alia in his Epiflle to
juft.Mar.^r^Wj by Adrian himfelf in his Refcript,
Euf Hift. ^y Antoninus Pius in his Epiftle to the Com-
Jib. IV. c. mon Council or the Community of the Eftates
8,9>n- pf A/iay though fome afcribe this Epiflle to
M. Antoninus fnot to mention his Epiftle to
0) Juft. the Senate of Rome . ) (0) Trypho the Jew
£^rtyr' likewife frees them from the Crimes com-
monly laid againft them, and owns the Excel-
lency of their Precepts contained in the Go-
Ipel. And it is obfervable, that thole Crimes
which had been wont to be objected againft
the Chriftians by their former Adverlaries,
were not mentioned by Julian^ in Difcourfes
0>) Eplft. written to oppofe them ; who (/>) elfewhere
49. & fpeaks of them in iuch a manner, and lo
Epiftmp. rnuch to their commendation, as fhews the
3cr- mighty force of Truth which could ex-
tort it from him. But thetFear and Shame
of Men hindred, divers from embracing the
Chriftian Religion, who had a truer Notion
of Things,- than to approve of their own.
(*) Aug. (g) Seneca expofed the Heathen Worfhip, and
P^yP*' expreiS'd himfelf with bitternefs againft the
c. 11. ' the Jews, but being able to find nothing to
blame
of the- Chriflian 'Religion. 527
blame. in the Chriflian Religion, nor daring
to commend it for fear of giving Offence to
the Heathens, he made no mention of it at
all.
Thefe and fuch as thefe were the Occafions
of the Unbelief of the Jews and Gentiles :
Though it mud be confefTed, that there is
nothing more difficult to be accounted for
than the Notions and Actions of Men ; it is
as hard to give an Account how (r) Seneca (0 Senec
and Plutarch mould allow of the Murdering JeIcu;^*
or Starving of poor Infants (as they certainly Piut. in
did) as why they were not Chriftians. No LycurS-
Thanomena in Nature can be more variable
and uncertain in their Caufes than the Opi-
nions and Practices of Men, which differ ac-
cording to their Tempers and Capacities and
Circumftances ; it is fuflicient, if we can find
out any probable Solution, and have feverai
to offer, which might take place according
to feverai Cafes. But the Writings o£ fuch
as oppofed the Chriflian Religion, were very
flight and frivolous, containing a Confeflion
for the mod part of the principal Matters of
Facl, upon which our Faith is eftablifhed,
and railing only fome weak Cavils which
never came up to the main Caule, or under-
took to difprove the Truth of the Miracles
and Prophecies upon which it is founded.
They could not deny the Miracles, upon
which our Religion is eftablifhed, and then
let any Man judge what Reafons they could
have
528 The Reafonab/enefs and Certainty
have for their Infidelity. And indeed the
prevaling of tne Chrifttan Religion under all
manner of Difadvantages as co Humane
Means, mewed that the Adverlaries of it,*
had little to fay againft it, For they mull
be but poor Arguments, which could not
diffuade Men from becoming Chriftians,
when they muft incurr all the Dangers and
Sufferings of this World to be lb..
The Books of the firft Heathen Writers
againft the Chriftian Religion are frequent-
ly cited by St. Jerom, and St. Auftin^ and o-
ther Authors of their Time, as commonly
known, and probably they were extant long
after. So that their Arguments were baffled,
and deftroyed, long before the Books them-
felves, and they had Tjme and Opportuni-
ty -enough to do all the "Milchief that they
Were capable of. And their Writings are
not yet fb far loft, but that we ftill know
their Principal Arguments, which the Chrifti-
an Writers have not concealed, but have
given them their full Force, and common-
ly in their own Words. Ori$en was fo care-
ful to omit nothing confiderablc which Cel-
fus had alleged, that he was often forced to
make Apologies for mentioning the fame
things over again, rather then he would
(s) Ambr ^cem to ^cc any tmngs Pa^s» which was Ma-
lib 2. E-terial, that his Adverlary had faid, without
?,ft-'f-.A taking Notice of it. (s) And fome Pieces
43, are prelervcd entire, as the Petition or i>ym-
mad-ut
of the Chriflian Religion. j 2p
machm among the Epiflles of St. Amtrofe,
and the Epiftle of Maximus -Madaurenfis a-
mong thofe oiSx..Auflin. The Arguments of
Julian are fet down at large by St. Cyril %
and we Learn from (t) St. Chrifoftom that^W*
the Books of the Philofophers againfl the "ty*^.*"
Chriflian Religion, were neglected and def- Vid.Span-
pifed by the Gentiles themlelves, and were JuHan?
icarce to be found but among the Chriflians, oper.Pi*-
before the Edict oiTheodofius Junior, to pro-6**
hibit them.
There was a long Succeflion of Philofo-
phers and Sophiils, who made it their bufi-
nefs to oppofe the Chriflian Religion. The
Shool of PlatowftS) which continued at A-
them for lome Ages, would revive, or rein-
force, any 'Arguments, that had been ufed
by their Predeceflbrs in Oppofition to
Chriflianity. Troclw and Damafcius^ who
were of this School, lived about the middle
of the Sixth Age, and the Writings of Dama* / « p^
fcius were extant (u) in fhotims time, in the cod.
middle of the Ninth Age* the Hiflory °f £«~ ccxLrF'
napius was then likewife extant, and is (x) LXXVlf.
laid to be prefer ved ac Venice : We have the
Abridgment of it by Zofimus and a fujflcient fc^f5^
Specimen of his malicious Invectives in hiso-
ther Writings. And it is probable, that
thefe, and many other Books of the like na-
ture, which are now loft, continued much
longer, than any Accounts, which, we have
now remaining of them mention. Of about
M m Thirty
530 The Reafonab/enefs and Certainty
(y) Hoi- Thirty Anfwers (y) which were wricten to
Vk'k* ~P°rptyry> ky ^veral Author, not one of
Script, them is now to be found. When the World
Porphyr. was fatisfied of the infufficieny of his Ob-
jections, the Anfwers to his Books were as
little regarded as the Books themfelves, but
underwent the fame Fate with them.
The Jews, who from the beginning of
Chriftianity, before, but efpecially fince, the
Deftru&ion of 'prujalem, have in vaft Num-
bers been fpread all over the World, and
have ever been the mod implacable Enemies
of the Gofpel, had the greateft Opportunity
to detecT: any falfhood in it, and .have never
omitted any Advantage of improving and
enforcing the Arguments againft it; and
and therefore would be lure to' retain iniy
thing confiderable, which had been objected
by their Fore-Fathers, or -by the Heathens,
with whom they converfed. The Jews have
been a perpetual reftlefs Enemy in all Parts
and Ages of the World, and nothing mate-
rial in this Cafe, would efcape their Obfer-
vation. But out of the Writings of the An-
cient Jews, which are (till extant, many things
have been alleged by many Learned Men,
of our own and other Nations,in confirmation
of our Religion, from the Confeflion of the
jfeMtf'themfelves.
The Unbelief therefore both of the Jews
and Gentzles of thole Ages, is no material
Objection ; nor altogether fo unaccountable
as
of the Chrijlian Religion. 531
as the Unbelief of too many now, who were
born among Chriftians, and have had their
Education in the Chriftian Religion. The
Truth is, Example is always the weakeft Ar-
gument in any Cafe, and can be "of no Force
or Authority againft the cleared rational Evi-
dence.
CHAP. XXXI.
77m the Confidence of Men of falfe Reli-
gions ^ and their Willingnefs to fujfer for
themy is no Prejudice to the Authority of
the True Religion.
TH E Chriflian Religion doth infinitely
furpafs all others in the Number of its
Martyrs of both Sexes, of every Age and
Nation, and Rank and Condition. Miitaken
ignorant Zealots may often have fufrered for
other Religions, but Men of the higheft Sta-
tion and Worth, and infenour to none in the
Knowledge and Experience of every thing
that the World efteems Excellent, have re-
nounced all, and upon choice, and after a full
confideratipn of the Merits of the Caufe, have
laid down their Lives for the lake of the-Go-
fpel. Tyrants of the greatell: Power and
Cruelty have made it their Aim and Ambition
M m 2, by
• 53- The Re-ifoullcnefs tad Cettointf
by all forts of Tortures to extirpate the Chri-
fuan Religion ; they efteemed their Petfecu-
tions matter of Triumph, and a fit lubjecl for
W Gru* the (a) Inlcriptions of Monuments erected to
fcripr.n"p. tneif Memories. But the invincible Patience
238, 28c and glorious Sufferings- of the Chriftians pre-
vailed againft all the Rage and Force of their
Enemies. If the Maryroiogies of 'all Reli-
gions were to be compared, there would foon
appear lb manifeft a difference between the
Chrifhan Martyrs and the Sufferers for other
Religions, that nothing would be needful to
be laid upon thiS fiibjed. But remembring
with whom I have to deal, I am relblved to
take every thing at the lowed, and argue
with them upon their own Terms. Let us
for a while let afide whatever of this nature
might be faid in preference of the Chnllian
Martyrs, and fuppofe the Numbers and Zeal
of the Martyrs ( for fo we mull call them ac
prefent) of other Religions, to have been as
great as can be imagined, yet the Caule it
lelf makes a plain difference between them.
An ignorant Zeal in a wrong Caule is no
Argument againfl the Goodneis of any Caule,
which is maintained and promoted by luch a
Zeal as is realbnable, and proceeds upon
lure Grounds. Indeed, if v zty hard
and very ftrange, if that which is true, mould
be ever the lei's certain, or the lefs to be re-
garded and efteemed, becaufe there may be
other things that are falie, of which lome
Men
of the Chriflian Religion. 533
Men are as firmly perfuaded, .and are as ■
much concerned for them, as any one can be '
for the Truth it felf. And yet this is the
wiieft thing that many have to pretend a-
gainfl the certainty of the Religion, in which
they were Baptifed, that there are many Im-
poftures in the World, and none is without
its Zealots to appear in Vindication of it.
I am confident no Man ever parted with any
thing, but his Religion, upon fo weak a
Pretence.
A falfe Religion is not the only thing for
which Men are wont to have an undelerved
Value ,* but their Country, their Friends, and
themfelves tl\ey are commonly as much mi-
ftaken in, and do as highly overprize : Is
there then no real difference, or folid worth
in any of thefe ? Some of the mod unlikely
Countrys in the World have been admi-
red by the Natives, as if they were the
Garden of Eden, and the Place of taradife :
Though there is nothing eafier, than to make
a diftin&ion concerning different Countrys.
And it is as eafie to. diftingui/h between the
Ehfium of the Heathens, or Mahomet's Para-
d/fe, and the Kingdom of Heaven, and be-
tween the Ways which lead to them. There
is nothing, efpecially if it be of any Moment
and Coniequdnce to them, for which Men
have not fliewn themfelves paflionately con-
cerned ; and it is not to be expected that
fhey fhould be fo much more infallible in
M m 3 Religion
534 7/# Reafcnab/enefs and Certainty
Religion than in other things, or mould be
io much lefs in earneft about it, as not to
difcover the fame Frailties, and the fame Af-
fections, which are vifible in all the other
Actions and Bufinefs of their Lives.
It is often feen in mod Cafes, that fome
are as earneft and zealous in a falfe Caufe,
as others are in a True ; but doth this prove
that there is no difference between Falfhood
and Truth ? When two Men of oppofite
Parties are equally confident of the Good-
nefs of their Caufe, it is certain that but one
of them can be in the right ; and it is as cer-
tain, that one of them muft be, at lead, fo
far in the right, as he contradicts the other ;
becaufe, as the two Parts of a Contradiction
cannot be both True, fo they cannot be both
Falfe. If then a confident and zealous Per-
fuafion doth not determine Right and Wrong,
True and Falfe, the remaining difficulty is
how to diftinguiih them, and that mull be
by the proper Evidence, and the intrinfick
Goodnefs of the Caufe.
And our Evidence in behalf of our Reli-
gion is plain matter of Fadt, as the Death,
and Refurreclion, and Afcenfion ofourBlef-
fed Saviour, and the Miracles wrought by
him and his Apoftles. And if our Religion
has fufficient Proof of what we affert in mat-
ter of Facl:, and other Religions have not
fufficient Proof of that Authority to which
they lay claim , this muft determine the
Point,
of the Chriflian Religion. 53 j
Point, though a Mahometan or Pagan iliould
be as zealous for his Religion, as a Chriflian
can be. It is commonly and truly faid, that
it is not the Suffering, but the Caufe, which
makes the Martyr ; and if Men of Falfe Re-
ligions have never fo much Confidence of the
Truth of them, and have no Ground for it,
this can be no Argument againfl the Grounds
and Proofs upon which the Evidence of the
Chriflian Religion depends. Oilier Religi-
ons rnay have their Zealots, who offer them-
felves to die for them, but the Chriflian
Religion properly has the only Martyrs.
For Martyrs are Witneffes, and no other Re-
ligion is capable of being attefted in fuch a
manner as the Chriflian Religion ; no other
Religion Was ever propagated by Witnefles,
who had iccn and heard, and been every way
converfant in what they witnefled concerning
the Principles of their Religion ; no Religion
befides was ever preached by Men, who,
after an unalterable Conflancy under all kinds
of Sufferings, at laft died for aflerting it,
when they mufl of neceiTity have known,
whether it were true or falfe, and therefore
certainly knew it to be true, or elle they
would never have fuffered and died in that
manner for it ; no other Religion was ever
attdfled from its firfl Propagation for feveral
Hundreds of Years together, by Men who
had either feen the firfl Preachers themfelves,
or had been acquainted with others who
M m 4 had
536 77ie Reafonablenefs and Certainty
had fcen them, or had wrought Miracles,
and fcen others work them ; no other Re-
ligion is contained in Books, which were
written at the firft Propagation of it, and
difpers'd into all Countries, in all Languages,
amongft all forts of Men, and efpecially a-
mongft thofe who were moil concerned, and
moft able and defirous to difprove it, if it
had been falfe ; no Religion befides has by fo
weak and unlikely means prevailed over all
the Power and Policy of the World ; none
is in its Do&rin fo agreeable to Reafon, and
fo worthy of God for its Author ,• and none
has been delivered down with fo clear a con-
tinued and uninterrupted Teftimony through
all Ages, and conveyed by a fucceflion of
Teftimonies to this prefent Age : And there-
fore no other Religion can have Martyrs,
who can die in confirmation of fuch a Tefti-
mony as this, or who can be Martyrs and
Witnefles to it by alluring the World at their
Death, that they have received the Religion
thus teftified and confirmed, for which they
die.
It is not the bare averting a thing boldly,
and then dying for it, which makes a Martyr,
but the Qualifications neceflary in a Witnefs
are neceflary in him, that is, that he Ihould
have all Opportunities needful to know the
Truth, as well as no Temptation to fpeak
the contrary. Which Qualifications were evi-
dent in the Apoftles and firft: Martyrs, whofe
Tefti-
of the Chrijlian Religion. 537
Teflimony is that upon which the Proof of
our Religion is founded, and the Martyr-
doms of latter Ages are additional Teftimo-
nies, which Without the former would be in-
fignificant, but, fuppofing them are all the
Teflimony that can be given to any matter
of Fadt at this diftance of Time, and are as
much beyond the Sufferings in behalf of any
other Religion, as the Evidence of the Chri-
itian Religion is beyond the Evidence for all
others.
It is not merely 2eal, though it proceed
even to Death and Martyrdom, upon which
we build our Faith, but the Reafons which
Chriflians have for their Zeal. Divers Nati-
ons have been as earned Aflertors of their
Fabulous Antiquities, as others can be of
theirs, which ate known to be true,* but are
thefe ever the lefs,-or thofe ever the more
true upon that account ? We infill upon it,
that we have Books to mew, and clear Evi-
dence to produce for what we maintain, and
thefe have been examined by many Men in
every Age, and compared with what is to be
alleged in behalf of contrary Religions, and
Men of the greatefl Learning and Judgment
and Prudence have chofen to die rather than
to renounce this Religion for any other, after
the nicefl and moil impartial Examination
they could make. Whereas the Zealots and
Martyrs for the Religions which are contra-
ry to Chriftianityj mull be acknowledged
to
538 The Reasonableness and Certainty
to be Men that underftand nothing of Anti-
quity, hue are ignorant of the Hiftory of
their fcveral Religions, and take all upon
uncertain Report, and abliird Traditions,
without any Proof or Po/fibiiity of it, and
even againft manifeft Reaibn, and the Evi-
dence of undoubted Hiftory.
So plain is it, that the Zeal and Confidence
of Men of falfe Religions, and their willing-
nefs to die for them can be no prejudice to
the Authority and Certainty of the true Re-
ligion. The Enthufiafms and vain Notions
and Conceits of lbme Zealots can be no more
a Prejudice to the Truth and Reality of our
Religion, than it is an Argument againft the
Truth and Certainty of Human Reafon, that
there are lb many Fools and Madmen in the
World.
CHAP. XXXII.
That Differences in Matters of Religion^
are m Prejudice to the Truth and Au-
thority of- it.
THere is nothing which has proved a
a greater Snare and Scandal to weak
Minds, nor which gives the Enemies of Re-
ligion greater Advantage, as they think, a-
gainft it, than the Diflentions amongftChri-
ftians,
' of 'the Chrifkan Religion. j?p
ftians, and the different Sedts and Parties
into which they are divided. This makes
fome willi'ng to. conclude that there is no
certainty on any fide, when they fee equal
Zeal and equal Confidence in Men of all
Perfuafions, that contend for their feveral
Opinions.
But St. Paul writes to the Corinthians, that
there mud be not only D^pifions, but Here-
fies alfo, and not only that they muft be,
but that they are not without their ufe and
expediency in the Church ; They are fo far
from being any real Prejudice to the Truth
and Certainty of Religion, that they do in-
deed conduce to manifeft the Excellency of
it, and the Sincerity of thofe that profeis it.
For there m*ft he alfo Herefies among you, that
they which are approved may he made manifeft
among you, i Cor. xi. 19. From whence I mall
fliew, I. That Differences in matters of Reli-
gion muft be among Chriftians, unlels God
ihould miraculoufly and irrefiflibly interpofe
to prevent them. II. That it is not neceflary
nor expedient, that God mould thus interpofe.
III. That 'tlidc Differences, how great and
how many foever they be, even the worfl
of Schifms and Herefies, are no prejudice to
the Truth and Authority of Religion.
I. That Differences in matters of Religion
muft be among Chriftians, unlels God mould
miraculoufly and irrefiflibly interpofe to pre*
vent them. There mvft he alfo Herefies among
you :
54^ *R°e "Reafonablenefs and Certainty
you : The miraculous Power and Demonftra-
tion of an infallible Spirit in the A potties
themfelves could not hinder the rife of them.
// mufl needs be, fays our Saviour, that Of-
fences, or // is impoffible but that Offences mil
come ; hut wo unto him through whom they come,
Matth.'xviii. 7. Luke xvii.
The Church can by no means be free
from Offences, Sc^idals and Divifions, un-
lels God fhould forcibly reft rain Men from
running into them.
The Tempers and Capacities of Men are
very different, and therefore in many Cafes
they will make a different Judgment of
Things. Much Attention and Thoughtful-
nefs, and an exacl: Knowledg of Antiquity,
is requifite to make a true Judgment in di-
vers Controverfies, and few Men are wil-
ling.to be at that pains, which is neceftary
to inform themfelves aright in lefter Diffi-
culties; they are contented to* take up with
the Appearances of things, which firft offer
themfelves, or to which by Cuftom and E-
ducation they have been moft uled : There
is fo much Difficulty to get rid of Prejudices,
fo much Labour and Study is in many cafes
required in the fearch after Truth, that few
can prevail with -themfelves to undergo it.
Few Men examine the Ground of things,
and fewer do it to any Purpofc; moft Men
follow, as they are led, without any further
Care, or Thought, and die in the Religion
in
of the Cbrijlia?i Religion. 541
in which they were brought up, without
much troubling themfelves whether it be'
true or falfe, but taking all upon Trufl, if
they happen to be in the Right, it is by-
chance, and more than they know, or are
able to prove; if they be in the Wrong, they
know as little of it, but Right, or Wrong,
they follow the Example of others, of whom
they have conceived a favourable Opinion,
or who have fome Authority with them to
influence them ; they profefs their Religion,
as they practife other things, for no better
Realbn, than becaufe they lee others, have
done it before them, and they Hand up for
it only, as they do for all Cuftoms, which
by long ufe are become familiar, and almofl
natural to them, but may be worn out by
a different Practice and Cuftom.
And when the Generality of Men are thus
carelefs and unconcerned to examine tjie
Grounds and Principles of their feveral Religi-
ons,this gives a mighty Opportunity and Ad-
vantage to Men of ill Principles, and ill De-
figns, to infufe and fpread their Opinions.
For if by the Plaufiblenefs and Importunity of
their Infinuations, ©r by the Profefiion of a
more than ordinary Zeal andStridtnefs in fome
things, that are molt popular, they can but
gain a few Pcrfons of Note and Intereft,
who may influence others, a Party is made,
and a Se6t fet up, which may perhaps conti-
nue for fome Generations; and a fondnefs
for
542 The Reafonablcnefs and Certainty
for Novelty, and a Pcrfonal Diflike and Pre-
judice againft fome Men, and an Eileem
and Admiration of others, and ftvcral Acci-
dents, as they fall in with the ieveral Tem-
pers and Inclinations of Men, may make
great Additions to a Sect that is once rot *n-
ed. Men, who thought themfelves difobli-
ged amongfl the Jews, were wont to go o-
ver to the Samaritans ; and Deiertcrs, in Reli-
gion are as ufual as in War, upon any great
Difcontent, or upon hopes of great Advan-
tage. And thefe Men to Teftify their Sin-
cerity, are obferved commonly to be moil
Violent; however they ferve to make a
Number, and to flrengthen a Parry.
Moft Schifms and Herefies have been be-
gun by Men of ill Defigns, who under pre-
tences of Godlhiefs, gratified their own Pal*
fions of Ambition, or Covetoufnefs, or
more Scandalous Vices. This was the Ori-
ginal of the Herefies in the Apoftles days,
and it has been obfervable in the firft Au-
thors of them, ever fince. An Affectation of
Singularity, of Popular Fame, and Preemi-
nence have been the Occafion u." *ceat Mif-
chieves in the Church. Some Men are as
fond of their own New Opinions, as others
are of Honours, or Wealrh, or Pleaiure ;
and can bear no Contradiction, but contend
for a kind of Empire in Knowledge, and
ihew a mighty Zeal to gain Profelytes, be-
caufe this is to extend their Conquefts, and
enlarge
of the Chriflian Religion. 543 ,
enlarge their Dominion over Mens Faith.
Some that devoured Widows Houfes, have/<?r
a pretence made long Frayers. Matt, xxiii. 14.
And it is a fhame, and Horror, even to /peak
ofthofe things, which have been done by o-
thers ; not only in fecret but openly, and in
the View of the World, under the mod fb-
lemn and Zealous Profe/fions for the Glory
of God, and the Good of Souls. And the
Errors ' of Men of no ill meaning, but of
great Zeal, with little Knowledg, have fbme-
times found a ftrange Acceptance in the
World, for the fake of that Integrity and
Sincerity, which appeared in their firft Au-
thors.
Now when all the Pa/fions and Infirmi-
ties, and Vices of Men thus contribute to
produce and promote Differences in Religi-
on, it is no greater Wonder, that there are
fuch Differences, than that there are Frailties
and Vices amongft Men; that fome Men
are vicious, and ready to leduce others, and
that others are ealy to be feduced.
St. Paul complains of Jalfe Apoflfes, deceit-
ful Workers, Transforming themfelves into the
Apoftles of Chrijl, and nv Marvel, lays he, for
Satan himfelj is Transformed into an Angel of
Light*, therefore it is no great thing, if lus
Miniflers a/Jo be Transformed, as the M'wifters
of Righteoufnejs, ivhoje end fh a 11 be according to
their Works, 1 Cor, xi. 13. 14. 15*. Satan
himfclf drives to appear like an Angel of
Light,
544 ^)e Reafintb/enefr and Certainty
Light, and Sin is forced to take the dilguife
of Religion. Vice is a thing, 'which few
Men care much to own, how fond ibever
they be of it : Numbers in other cafes are
wont to bring things into Reputation, but it
is not foin moil Vices, which 1110' they have
been pradifed by great Numbers of Men hi
all Ages, yet have been always neverthelefs
infamous ; and this fhews the deteftabie Na-
ture of Vice and Irreligion, that they could
never become creditable in a vicious and ir-
religious World, but bad Men are afhamed of
them, and endeavour to conceal and .hide
them under fbme colour of Religion and Ver-
tue.
But fince every Vice, and every Paflion,
and Intereft of Men may conduce to the rai-
fing and fomenting of Differences in Religi-
on, it is as impollible, that they mould not
be in the- World, as that Sin it felf fhould
not be in it, which can never be wholly pre-
vented, unlefs God mould force Men to be
Good,- and therefore it is impoffible, that
there fhould be no Differences in Religion,
unlefs the fame Force and Necefftty ihould
reftrain Men from them.
II. It is not neceffary, nor expedient, that
God fhould miraculouily and lrre.illibly in*
terpofe to prevent Differences in Matters of
Religion: Bccauie it would contradicl the
very Defign of all Religion for God thus to
interpole: The Defign of Religion is to Di-
rect
of the Chriflian Religion. 74 J
rect and Command Men, what to Believe,
and what to Do, upon fuch Terms as may
prevail with them by reafonable Arguments,*
by Exhortations and Encouragements on the
one hand, and Admonititions and Threat-
nings on the other. But to force Men to be
of one Mind, and one Profefllon, Would be
to lay afide thefe Terms, and to render the
Motives and Arguments which Religion
propofeth ufelefs, and to have no Regard to
the Rewards, and Punifliments, by which it
is enjoy ned. There can be no more Reafon,
that God mould conftrain Men to have right
Notions of Religion, than that he mould
force them to obey thofe Notions, and put
them in Practice • or that he fliould reftraiti
Men from Herefies and Schifms ,• that is
from fuch Sins as more directly and immedi-
ately concern Religion, rather than from a-
ny other Sins: But there is great Reafon,
why it fliould not be fo, becaule this would
make Religion it felf ufelefs and infignifi-
cant, by taking away the Grounds and
Foundations of all Religions, and by de-
ftroying the Liberty of Mankind, which is
neceflary in all Acts of Religion. For, ht
that A&s by Nece/fity, cannot Acl: by the
Principles of Religion, which advifes and
commands Men to refufe the Evily and chuj'e
the Good. Differences in Religion could not
be prevented without over-ruling all the Pa£
fions, and hindering all the Vices of Men,
N n and
5 ^6 The Reafonablcnefs and Certainty
and without fruftrating the Commands and
Precepts, and contradicting the Defign and
Inftitution of Religion ; and it is not to be
expected, that rather than iuffcr Differences
in Religion, God mould fo check and reftrain
Men, as not to leave them at Liberty to Act
upon the Principles of Religion, but upon
mere Force and Neceffity. If Men be per-
mitted to Err and to Sin, they will Err and
Sin in Matters relating, to Religion, as well
as in others, and to debar Men unavoidably
from Sin and Error would be to proceed in
fuch a manner, as is inconfiftent with the
Motives and Arguments both ofRcafon and
Religion, and to offer Violence, not only to
human Nature, but to the W if Horn and
Counfel of God,, in his Dilpenfations for the
Salvation of Mankind.
It is the W idiom of God not to force Men
upon doing Good, but to bring Good out of
Evil, and if Men will refolve to commit Sin,
and will not be prevailed upon by all that
God has faid and done to withdraw them
from it ; then to make their worft Actions
inftrumental to his own Glory, and to the
Salvation of other Men. And there is this
good effect: from the mo ft pernicious Herefies
andSchifms, That thofe which are approved may
he made manifefl by them ; that the Sincerity
of the good Chriltian may appear, and that
the Dilguife may be taken off from Hypo-
crites, that they may be no longer able to
feduce
of the Chrifli an Religion. 547
feduce Men by a mew of Godiinefs. It is a
juft Judgment of God upon unrepenting Sin-
ners, to let them fall from one Wickednefs to
another ; and not come into his Righteoujnefs ;
to punifti fecret Sins, by fuffering Men to run
into publick and notorious Crimes, whereby
they difcover and expose themfelves to the
World. Thus it was in the cafe of thole
Hereticks of whom St. Paul fpeaks, They
profeft that they knew God, but in Works they
denied him, being abominable and difobedient,
and to every good Work reprobate, Tit. i. 1 6.
And giving a full and lamentable Defcription
of this fort of Men, in conclufion he fays,
But they (lull proceed no farther ; for their Folly
fhaUbe manifeft to all Men, z Tim. iii. 9. They
were permitted to come to fuch horrid and
frightful degrees of Wickednefs and Blafphe-
my, as thai all Men, who meant well, would
be lure to avoid them, and to depart from
them ; and of thofe who joined themfelves
with fuch Men, and went over to them, St.
John declares, They went out from us, but they
were not of us : for if they had been of us, they
would no doubt have continued with us : but
they went out, that they might be made mani-
feft, that they were not all of us, 1 John ii. 19.
And when thefe and fuch like Herefies
break loofe, and difturb the Peace of the
Church, this makes all fincere Chriftians
more carefuf and diligent to hold fafl the form
of found Words, and- earneftly contend for the
N n 2 Faith
548 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
Faith which was once delivered to the Saints.
Men are apt to be too cat clefs and unconcern-
ed about Religion, when they meet with no
Opposition : But when the Faith is denied,
and the Terms of Salvation are difputcd a-
gainft, this will flir up and actuate a mighty-
Zeal in all, who have any regard for the
Honour of God, and the Salvation of Men.
From whence it comes to pafs, that mod He-
refies have been of no long continuance, but
appear and (hew themielvcs, are difproved,
become odious, and after a while are hardly
known, but from the Books of fuch as con-
futed them ; and thofe Points of DocTrin
which were contradicted, become fo much
the better eftablifhed, and the more firmly
believed for the future. Herefies are but the
Tryals of Religion, as Dangers are of Cou-
rage ,• it (lands to the Honour and Evidence
of Truth, to be exercifed and encompafled
with Errors, which fall before it, and arc able
to do it no hurt.
So that Differences in Religion are fufrer-
cd by Almighty God, as all other Sins are,
becaufe it is the defign of Religion, not to
compel Men, but to perfuade and exhort
them, and to permit them to be guilty of all
manner of Sin, whilfl it offers the moft pre-
vailing Arguments and Motives againft it ;
and to be guilty of Schifms anci Herefies a-
mongft the reft : And thefe are Temptations
and Tryals to good Men, and often ferve
as
of the Chriflian 'Religion. 549
as Judgments upon the wicked, to pu nidi one
Wickednefs with another, and expofe them-
to the World for Hypocrites and Impoftors.
And they ferve to confirm the Articles of
our Faith, which hereby become the more
.throughly examined, and the more fully ex-
plained. And thefe are fufficient Reafons,
why God fhould not by his Almighty Power
hinder thofe Differences in Religion, which
muft of neceffity happen by the Sins andFoIly
Men, unlefs he fhould miraculoufly and irre-
fiftibly interpofe to prevent them.
IIL Thefe Differences how great and how
many loever they may be, even the worft of
Schifms and Herefies are no Prejudice to the
Truth and Certainty of Religion. Religion
is our Dire&ion, our Way to Heaven and
Happinefs, but will any Man fay, that be-
caufe there are many wrong ways, therefore
there is none right > This is beneath the Di£
cretion of every ordinary Traveller, who, if
the way be difficult, refolvcs to ufe the more
Care and Diligence in finding it out, but
never concludes with himfelf that there is no
fuch way, and no fuch place as that which he
intends to go. For a Man to argue from the
multitude of Herefies and Schifms againfl the
Truth of Religion, is as if he would prove,
that becaufe there are lb many Curve Lines,
therefore there can be none R/gbt ; when for
this very Reafon we muft conclude, that
there is fuch a thing as flreightnefs, or elfe
N n 3 there
550 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty .
there could be nothing crooked ; for we can
have no Notion of one without the other.
And as ail Obliquity fuppoies Rectitude, from
which it declines, fo Vice iuppofes Vertue,
and Error fuppofes Truth, and Error in Reli-
gion mufl luppofe Truth in Religion. For,
whatever is contrary to any thing neceflari-
ly implies the Being of that to which it is
contrary ,- and that which is not, can have
nothing contrary to it. Nothing is more
certain than it is, that if there were.no Ver-
tue, there cou Id be no Vice ; if no Truth,
there could be no Error, and unlefs there
were Truth and Excellency in Religion, it
were impoflible that there fliould be any
fuch thing as Herefie or Schifm, which are
other words for Error and Vice in matters of
Religion. And it hath been already obfer-
ved, that the worft Herefies give an occafion
to . the clearing thole Points of Religion
which are difputed agiinft, and lb mufl: be
far from invalidating the Truth of it.
But becaufe thefe are things which fome
will not underfland, or may be unwilling to
acknowledge ; and it is generally looked up-
on as a fure Argument of the weaknefs of
any Caule, when thole that maintain it are
not agreed about it amongft themf elves ; let
us confider, i. That all Parties are agreed
in the Truth of Religion in general, and of
the Chriftian Religion in .particular : 2. That
there is nothing befides in which Men have
not
of the Chriflian Religion. 5 5 1
not difagreed, as well as in matters of Reli-
gion.
1. All Parties are agreed in the Truth of
Religion in General, Even Hypocrites and
Impoflors fo far own Religion, as to believe
that it is worth the counterfeiting. For no
Man counterfeits that which is not, no, nor
that which has no Worth nor Excellency in
it. No Man will be at much pains to be
thought an Atheift, or an Infidel, who is not
fuch ; and no Man will endeavour to be
thought Vicious, unlefs he be fo indeed.
There are few pretenders to the Shame and
Infamy which in Ages have been infeparable
from Irreligion ; but it is the natural Senfe
which Men have of Religion, that gives it fo
great Credit and Honour in a wicked World,
that even the Shadow and Counterfeit of it
has fbmetimes too much prevailed.
But farther, all Sedts and Parties of Chri-
flians are agreed in the Truth of the Chriflian
Religion, and the only ^difference amongfl
them is concerning particular Doclrins and
Opinions, that is, concerning the true Mean-
ing and Explication of it : And no Man dis-
putes about the Meaning of that which they
do not at the fame time luppofe to be. W hen
any Point or Ciaufe of a Law is in Dilpute,
it would be ridiculous from thence to con-
clude, that no fuch Law was ever made ,• be-
caule all Parties mufl agree that there is fuch
a Law, oi; elfe there could be no difpul s
N n 4 ab >
552 The Eeafonab/enefs and Certainty
about ic And when Differences arife in Re-
ligion, it is an Argument for the Truth of
Religion, becauic there can be Difference
about nothing, and Men would never differ
about Religion, if it were not true, or they
did not think it to be io.
But Chriftians are not only agreed in the
main that the Gofpel is true, but they are
Jikcwife agreed in the Senfe and Meaning of
it, as to the Fundamental Articles neceiiary
to Salvation. This was the ancient Rule
and Meafure laid down by Vincent ins Liri-
nenfis, of the Catholick Dodtrin neceifary
to be believed, that it had been believed in
all Ages, in all Places, and in all Churches.
And the excellent Arch-Bifhop Ujher, whofe
Judgment in the Cafe may fafe-
M Biief Declaration of jy b clkc| upon [ias ^ fa
the Umverlality of the J . v , ■ i
Church of Chtift, and the ciared, That // at this day we
jjniry of rhe Catholick il,0HiJ take a furvey of the feve-
iaith prorened therein, de- J ,,;. r> , V rr-l • a-
limed in a Sermon before W (b) ProJejfwnS of Chrijtiani-
the King the 20th otjme, ;/v that have any large f pre ad in
■ % ThisPaffigc »« pro- **f P*'* °f *ke World (as of the
duced by Dr. Pofter, and Religion of the Roman and the
defended by Mr. - ' A/V%, Heformeif Churches in our Quar-
ten, of the Egyptians and Al-
thiopians in the South, of the Grecians and
other Chriftians in the Raft em patts) and
(hould put by the Foints wherein they differ from
one another, and gather into one Body the reft
of the Articles, wherein they all did generally
agree \ w- jhoidd fyd, that in thofe Proporti-
on u
of the Chrifiian Religion. 55$
cns7 which without all Controvert are fo unz-
verfally received in the whole Chriftian Wotld,
jo much Truth is contained, as heing joined with
holy Obedience, may befufficientto bring a, Man
unto everlafling Salvation. Neither have we
caufe to doubt but that "as many as do walk ac-
cording to this Rule (neither overthrowing that
which they have built, by fuperinducing any
damnable Herefies thereupon, nor other wife
vitiating their Holy Faith with a lewd and
wicked converfation) Peace fhall be upon them,
and Mercy, and upon the Ifrael of God. And
he afterwards fays, in relation to the Papifts
in Ireland, that he had fome times treated with
thofi of the oppofite Party, and moved shem, that
howfoever in other things we did differ one from
another, yet we fhould join together in teaching
thofi main Points, the knowledge whereof wasfo
necejjary unto Salvation, and of the Truth where-
of there was no Controverpe betwixt us.
And as to particular Controverfies, tho'
one would imagin that wife Men of all others
fhould be leaftflpt to fall out about Words ;
yet it is an old Obfervation, that when
learned and wile Men difagree in Opinion,
the Difference is commonly in the manner
of expre/fing themfelves ; or however it is
generally about the .manner of the Exigence,
not about the Exiftence, it felf, of Things.
Thus what is better known by all than the
Sun ? and yet what Difputes have there been,
and ever will be concerning its Light, and
Motion,
5 j^ The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
Motion, and Diflance, and Dimcnfions ?
But it ought likewife to be confidered,
that in. the Management of the Controver-
fies in Religion, fuch as are otherwiic good
Men,, are wont many times to be little fa-
vourable in reprefenting the Opinions of their
Adverfaries ; and if Men might be allowed
to explain themfelves, and were not pro-
voked and exaiperated beyond their own
calmer Thoughts and Temper, the Diffe-
rences in Religion would not be near fo
great, nor fo many, as they now appear
to be. It fo happens in all -Cafes, that
Differences are widened by eager and con-
tentious Debates ; Men fpeak more than
they defigned, and then refolve to defend
"what they have faid, fo that Difputes become
endlefs, and are drawn out into Particulars
without number, which were never at firfl
thought of. .Many Books of Controverfie
are half taken up in asking crofs Queflions,
which perhaps neither of the Parties can an-
fwer to latisfa&ion, nor dojliey often feem
to defign any thing farther, than to puzzle
one another, and to be as captious and as
troublefom as they can. But this ought not
to be imputed to the uncertainty of the Sub-
ject, but to the perverihefs of Men; and
thole, who upon every occafion fall into fo
great Heats and Contentions, mull needs be
vc :y well allured of that in which they
' ce, that is, of the Truth of Religion in
General,
of the Cbriftian 'Religion. j j y
General, and of the Chriftian Religion in
Particular, as to the Fundamental Points of
it. The Differences among Chriftians may
lerve to prove to us Divine Authority of out
Religion, and of the Scriptures, which con-
tain it, fince Chriftians agree in aflerting
their Divine Authority, and have never been
fo much at unity among themfelvcs, as to
be able to agree to corrupt them, but have
certainly delivered them down entire to us.
z. It is not Religion only, which Men
Difpute about, but there is nothing befides,
in which they have not difagreed. It is ot>
ferved, that want of Experience and Know-
ledge of the World, leads Men into more in-
conveniencies, than want of Parts and Abili-
ties. And it is as certain, that a thorough
Knowledge of the Debates and Contentions in
Philofophy, would fooner cure mofl Men of
their Infidelity, than any Arguments could
do. Thofe who raife Objections againfl Re-
ligion, if they would but confider, that al-
moft every thing elfe has as great Difficulties,
would be afhamed to rejecl: Religion upon
Pretences, which, if they hold, muft force
them to rejecl: all other things with it, and
to believe juft nothing at all. There have
been Difputes in all Ages concerning Light
and Motion, the Wind and Seas, and other
Wonders of Nature, but it would be abfurd
for this Reafon, to queftion, whether there
be any fuch thing as Light and Motion, and
what-
5 5 5 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
whatever befides Men have difputed. And
yet it is more abfurd, if it be poffible, to al-
low that is a good Argument againft Religi-
on, but againft; nothing elfc. If the Sun
yield his Light, and Nature go on in her con-
stant Courfe, tho' Men differ never fo much
in their Philofophy about it, what can Reli-
gion be the worfe for their Difputes ? no bo-
dy thinks, that he fees ever the lefs for any
Difficulties, which have been urged concern-
ing Vifion ; and why fhould we be ever the
lefs inclined to believe the Truth of Religi-
on, by reafon of any Controverfies in it >
Men may difpute any thing, and there is
hardly any thing but it has been difputed ;
but nothing is the lefs credible for being dif-
puted, unlefs it can be difproved, but is ra-
ther confirmed and advanced by it. Truth,
is nevenhelefs Truth for meeting with op-
pbfition, but is the more tried, and the
more approved, as Strength and Courage is
by the iharpeft Conflicts.
Since then there will be Vices, as long as
there are Men in this World, and Differences
and Diflentions in Religion, as long as there
are Vices ; fince they cannot be hindered, but
by the Omnipotent Power of God, and there
are great Realons, why he mould not inter-
pofe to prevent them ; fince Differences in
Religion are fo far from implying any uncer-
tainty in Religion, that they rather prove a
Confirmation cf it, and are in divers refpecls
• made
of the Chriftian Religion. 557
made lifcful and expedient to the Edification
of Chriftians, it mud be great iriconfiderati-
on and weaknefs, to produce them as an
Objection againft Religion.
There muft be ' Herefies > and the Spirit fpeik-
eth exprefly that in the latter Times fome fhall
depart from the Faith, giving heed to Seducing
Spirits, and Dotlrins of Devils, [peaking Lies
in Hypocrify^ having their Qonjcience- feared
with an hot Iron. 1 Tim. iv. 12, The Scrip-
ture could not be true, unlefs thefe things
fhould happen, which are foretold in feveral
Places of Scripture. Behold, fays our Savi-
our, / have told you before. Matt. xxiv. z$. it
ought to be no new nor furprifing thing to
Chriftians, to fee Herefies arife, tho' they
be never fb wicked and abominable ,• becauie
we are forewarned to expeel: them, and they
ferve to give a kind of Teftimony to the-
True Religion in fulfilling the Predictions
of it. They help to prove the Religion,
which they would deftroy : For if
there had been no Herefies, that Religion
could not be True, which has foretold them;
but-£nce there are Herefies, our Religion
is at lead fo far true as to contain exprels
Prophecies concerning them, which we fee
daily fulfilled ,* and as they evidently prove
our Religion true in this particular, fo they
invalidate it in no other. Which is the {h)(b) Juft
Anfvver that the Chriftians anciently return- J*3"-
ed to the Enemies of Religion, when they
made this Objettion againft it. Let
55 8 The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
Let us follow the plain, the known, and
and confefled Duties of Religion; Humility,
Temperance, Righteoifnefs and Charity,
and when . once we have no Temptations to
wifh Religion untrue upon the account of
the plain Precepts and Directions of it, we
lhall never fufpecl: it to be fo, by reafon of
any Controverfies in it. For if Men will
impartially confider things; that Religion
which has now For fo many Ages flood out
all the Aflaults and Attempts, with Enemies
from without, and Parties within could make
againfl it, and has approved it much better,
and more glorioufly, than it could have
done, if there never had been either Herefies
or Schifms. Let us therefore hold fail the
Trofeffwn of our Faith without Wavering be-
ing allured, that the Gates of 'Hell, that is,
all the Power and Stratagems of Satan, mail
never be able to prevail againfl the Church
of Chrift, but lhall only ferve to add to its
Victories, and adorn its Triumphs. The
Malice, O Lord, and fierce fiefs of Man fhall
turn to thy Vraife : And the fiercenefs ef them
fhalt thou refrain Pf. Lxxvi. 10.
CHAP.
of the Chrijlian Religion. 5 5 <)
CHAP. XXXIII.
Though all Objections could not be anfwer-
redy yet this would be no jujl Caufe to
re\eSl the Authority of the Scriptures.
ALL Objections, which can with any
Colour or Pretence be alleged, have
been confidered, and anfwered, by divers
Men of Great Learning and Judgment ; and
feveral Objections, which have made mod
no ife in the World, as that about the Capa-
city" of the Ark, and others, have been De~
mondrated to be groundlefs and frivolous.
But tho' all Difficulties could not be accoun-
ted for, yet this would be no jud or fiiffiri~
enc caufe, why we mould rejedt the Scrip-
tures ; becaufe Objections for the mod part
are impertinent to thePurpofe, for which they
were defigned, and do not at all effect the
Evidence, which is brought in proof of the
Scriptures; and if they were pertinent, yet
unlefs they could confute that Evidence, they
ought not to determine us againdthem.
He -that with an honed and- fincere Defire
to find out the Truth, or Falfhbodj of a Re-
velation, enquires into it, mould flrd confi-
der impartially what can be alleged for it,
and afterwards confider the Objections raifed
againd it, that fo he may compare the Ar-
guments
5^0 Tlx Rcafonablenefs and Certainty
ments in proof of it, and the Objections to-
gether, and determine himfelf on that fide,
which appears to have molt Reafon for it. '
But to infift upon particular Objections, col-
lected out of Difficult Places o£ Scripture,
Ctho* they would likewife obferve the An-
fwers, that have been given, which few of
our Objectors have patience to do, but run
away with the Objection without flaying for
an Anfvver ) I fay to allege particular Ob-
jections, without attending to the main
Grounds and Motives^ which induce a be-
lief of the Truth of the Scriptures, is a very
deceitful way of Arguing : Becaufe it is not
in the lead improbable, that there may- be a
true Revelation, which may have great Dif-
ficulties in it. But if fufftcient Evidence be
produced to convince us, that the Scriptures
are indeed God's Word, and there be no
proof on the contrary to invalidate that Evi-
dence ; then all the Objections befides, that
can be raifed, are but Objections, and no
more. For if thofe Arguments by which our
Religion appears to be Tmie, remain {till in
their full Force, notvvithftanding the Objecti-
ons, and no pofitive and direct Proof be
brought, that they are infufficient, we ought
not to reject thofe Arguments, and theCon-
clufioiis deduced from them upon the Ac-
count of the Objections, but to reject the
Objections for the fake of thofe Arguments ;
becaufe if thofe cannot be difproyed, all the
Objections,
of the Cfwijlian "Religion. $6t
Which can be thought of, mud proceed from
fome Miftake. For when I am once allured
of the Truth of a thing, by dired and pofi-
tive Proof, I have the lame aflurance, that
all Objections again ft it muft be vain and
falfe, which I have, that that thing is true *
becaufe every thing muft be falfe, which is
oppofite to Truth, and nothing but that
which takes off the Arguments, by which
any thing is proved to be True, can ever
prove it falfe: But all Objections muft be
falfe themfelves, or infignihcant to the Pur-
pofe; for which they are* alleged, if the E-
Vidence for the Truth of that, againft which
they are brought, cannot be difpfoved, that
is, if the Thing, -againflr which they are
brought, be True.
To fhew this in Particulars. If a Man
mufter,up never fb many Inconfiftencies, as
he thinks, in the Scriptures, yet unlefs he
be as well aflured, at leaft, that thefe which
he calls Inconfiftencies, cannot be in any
Book of Divine Revelation ; • as he may be,
that the Scriptures are of Divine Revelation,
he cannot in Reafon reject their Authority,
And to be aftured of this, it muft be consi-
dered, what is inconfiftent with the Evidence
whereby the Authority of the Scriptures
is proved to us : For whatever is not incon-
fiftent with this Evidence, cannot be incon-
fiftent with their Authority. In like man-
ner, as if a Man fhould frame never fo many
Oo Ob-
5 6z 77;e Reasonableness and Certainly
Objections againll the Opinion commonly
received, that Cafar himfelf wrote the Com-
mentaries which go under his Name, and not
Julius Celjus, or any other Author ; unlcfs
he can overthrow the Evidence by which
Cafar appears to be the Author of them, all
his Objections will never amount to a Proof,
that he was not the Author.
It is very poflible for God to reveal things,
which we may not be able to comprehend ;
and to enad: Laws, efpeciaily concerning the
Rights and Ceremonies . enjoined a People
ib many Ages pall, the Realbns whereof we
may not be • fully to underftand ,• and it is
very poiTihle likewife, that there may be
great Difficulties in Chronology, and that the
Text may in divers places have a different
Reading : And though all thefe things have
been cleared to the iatisfaclion of reasonable
Men by feveral Expofitors, yet let us fup-
pofe at prefent to gratifie thefe Objectors
(and this will gratifie them, if any-thing can
doit) that the. Laws arc utterly unaccount-
able, riiat the Difficulties in Chronology are
no way adjulled, that the divers Readings
are by no means to be reconciled ; yet what
doth all this prove > That Mojes wrought no
Miracles ? That the Children of Ifrae-i and
the Egyptians were not Witneffes to 'them?
That what the Prophets foretold did not
come to pafs ? That our Saviour never rofe
from the Dead, and that the Holy Ghoft did
not
of the Cbrifiian Religion. Jtfj
not d'efcend upon the Apoflles ? Or that any
thing is contained in the Scriptures repug-
nant to the Divine Attributes, or to the na-
tural Notion of Good and Evil ? Doth it
prove any tiling of all this, or can it be pre-
tended to prove it ? If it cannot (and no-
thing is more plain, than that it cannot )
^hen all the Evidence produced in Proof of
the' Authority of the Scriptures Hands firm,
notwithstanding all this mighty noife of the
Obfcurity, and the Inconfiftency, and the
Uncertainty of the Text of the Scriptures.
.And the next enquiry naturally will be, not
how the Scriptures can be from God, if thefe
things be to be found in them Q for it is al-
ready proved that they are from God, and
therefore this rriuft from henceforth be taken
for granted,' till it can be difproved ) but the
'only Enquiry will be, how thefe Paflages
are to be explained, or reconciled with ocher
Places.
For let us cqnfider this Way of Reafbning,
' which is made ,ufe of to difprove the Truth
and Authority of the Scriptures in other
things, and .try whether we are wont to
reafon thus in any cafe, but that of Reli-
gion, and whether we mould not be aiha-
med of this waj" of arguing in any other
• i Cafe. How little is if. that we throughly un- ,
ftand in natural Things, and yet howfeldom.
do we doubt of the Truth and Reality of
them, becaufe we may puzzle and perplex
0'ir felves in the Explication of them ? For
O o % in-
564 The Iseafcnablencfs and Certainty
inftanco, we difcern the Light, and feci the
Warmm and Heat of the Sun, and have the
Experience, of the conftant returns of .Day
and Night, and of the lcveral Scalons of the
Year ; and no Man doubts but that all this
is effected by the approach or withdrawing
of the Sun's influence : But whoever will go
about to explain all this, and to give a par-
ticular Account of it, will find it a very hard*
Task ; and fuch Objections have been urged
againft every Hypothecs in ibmc P6int or
other, as perhaps no Man is able fully to
anfwer. But doth any Man doubt whether
there be fuch a thing. as Light and Heat, as '
Day and Night, though he cannot be fatis-
fied whether the Suit or the Earth move ? Or
do Men doubt whether they can lee or not,
till they can demonfirate how Vifion is made ?
And muft none be allowed to fee but Mathe-
maticians ? Or .do Men refufe to eat, till
they are fatisfied how and after what manner
rhey arc nouriih/d ? Yet if we mud befvvay-
ed by Objections, which do not come up to •
the main Point, nor affect the Truth and
Reality of Things, but only fill our Minds
with Scruples and Difficulties "about them,
we muft believe nothing which we do not
fully comprehend in every part and circum-
itance of it. For whatever we are ignorant
of concerning it, that may, it lcciiis, be ob-
jected againft the tiling itieif, and may be a
juit Realbn why we mould doubt of it. We
mull have a care of being too confident, that
we
of the. Chrifli an Religion. 5#5
we move, before- we can give an exact ac-
count of the Caufe and Laws of Motion,
which the greateft Philofcphers have not been
able to do ,• we mud not prefume to eat, till
we can tell how Digeftion and Nourifhment
are made. In fhort, this would run us into
all the Extravagancies of Scepticiim : For
uponthefe Principles it was, that ibme doubt-
ed whether Snow be. white, or Honey fweet,
or any thing elfe be of the fame Colour or
Tail, which it appears to be of, becaufe they
could amufe themlelves with Difficulties, and
they were too much Philofophers toaflent to
any thing that they did not underdand, tho*
it were confirmed by the Senfe and Experi-
ence of all Mankind. They were rational
Men, and k was below them to believe their
Senfes, unlefs their Reafon were convinced,
and that was too acute to be convinced, as
long as any Difficulty, that could be (tarred,
remained unanfwered. And thus under the
pretence of Reafon and Philoibphy they ex-
pofed themfelves to the Scorn and Derifion
of all who had but the common Senle of
Men, without the Art and Subtiity of impo-
/Ing upon themlelves and others.^
And it is the fame thing in efTecl:, as to
matters of Religion. The Scriptures come
confirmed down to us by all the ways of cpn-
flrmation, that, the Authority of any Reve-
lation at this diftance of time could be ex-
pected to have, if it really^ were, what we
O o 3 . be*
The Reafonablenejs and Certainty
believe the Scriptures to be. Why then do
fome Men doubt whether they be Authen-
tick ? Can they dilprove the Arguments
which are brought in defence of them ? Can
they produce any other Revelation more Au-
thentick ? Or is it more reaibnable to believe
that' God mould not reveaj himfelf to Man-
kind, than that this RevclatiorEfhould be his ?
No ; this is not the cafe, but there are leve-
ral things to be found in the Scriptures,
which they think would not be in them, if
they were of Divine Revelation. But a w ife
Man will never disbelieve a thing for any
Objections made againfl it, which do not
reach the Point, nor touch thefe Arguments,
by which it is proved to him. It is not in-
confiflenr, that that may be mofl true, which
may have many Exceptions framed againfl
it, but €t is abfurd to rcjed that as incre-
dible, which comes recommended by our Be-
lief by fuch Evidence as cannot be difprov'd.
Till this be done, all which can be faid be-
fides, only mews, that there are Difficulties
to be met withal in the Scriptures, which
was never denied by thofe, who mofl firmly
and fledfaflly believe them.
But -Difficulties can never alter the Nature
of Things, and make that which is true to
become falfe. There- is no Science without
its Difficulties, and it is not pretended that
Theology is without them. There are ma-
ny great and inexplicable Difficulties in the
Mathc-
of the Chrijhan Religion. j5y
Mathematicks ; but fhall we therefore rejecT:
■phis as a Science of no Value nor Certainty,
and believe no Demonftration in EucMe to
be true, unlefs we could Square the Circle >
And yet this is every whit as reafonable, as
it is, not to acknowledge the Truth of the
Scriptures, unlefs^ we could explain all the
Viftons in Ezekiel, and the Revelations of
St. John. We muft believe nothing, and
know nothing, if we mull disbelieve and re-
ject every thing which is liable to Difficul-
ties. We mull not believe we have a Sou),
unlefs we can give an account of all its Ope-
rations ;• nor that wTe have* a Body, unlefs
we can tell all the Parts and Motions; and
the whole Frame and Compofition of it.
We mud not believe our Senfes, till there is
nothing relating to Senfation but what we
perfectly underftana ; nor that there are any
Objects in the World, till we know the ex*
act manner how we perceive them, and can
lblve all Objections that' may be raifed con-
cerning them. And if a Man can be incredu-
lous to this degree, it cannot be expected
that he mould believe the Scriptures : But till
he is come to this height of Folly and Stupi-
dity, if he will be confident with Jiimfelf,
and true to thofe Principles of Reafon, from
which he argues in all other Cafes, he can-
not reject the Authority of the Scriptures
upon Ihe account of any Difficulties that he
finds in them, whilft the Arguments by
Oo 4 which
5 6 8 The Eeafonab/encfs and Certainty
which they arc proved to be of Divine Au-.
thority, remain unanfwercd. And all. the
Objections, which can be invented againft
the Scriptures, cannot fecm near fo abfurd ro
a confidering Man, as to fuppofe that God
fhoulc) not at all reveal himfelf to Mankind ;
or that the Heathen Oracles, or Mahomet's
4lw*n fliould be of Divine Revelation.
CHAP. XXXIV.
The Conclufion j containing an Exhortation
to ajenous Qonfideration of thefe things ^
both from the Example of the wifefl and
mojk learned Metij and from the infinite
' Importance of the Things themfehes.
AS Wile and as Learned Men as any
that ever lived in the World, have di-
ed in the Belief of the Chriftian. Religion,
when they had no filtered to engage them
£o k ; and many of them have led their
Lives under Pefecutions, and have at lafl
been put to Death, rather than they would
renounce that Faith which the Scriptures de-
clare to us. It cannot be denied but that
there have been Men of as great Learning,
and as great Numbers of them, profe/llng. the
Ch&ftiaft Religion* as have been of all other
Religions
of the Chriftian Religion. 569
Religions in the World : Indeed, all manner
of Arcs and Sciences have been more im-
proved by Chriftians, than by all other forts
of Men whatfbever ; and all rational and lb-
lid Learning is confined, as I may fay, with-
in Chriftendom. For, befides the Idolotrous
Worlhip, and other Impieties notorious a»
mong them, whatfbever Learning is to be
found among the Chincfe, or other Heathen
Nations, their Notions of Things, fo far as
they differ from what is contained in the
Scriptures, are fo obfcure and confufed a^t the
bed, arid, fo groundlefs, that that Chriftian
muft be very weary of his Religion, who can
think of changing it for fuch Unc'ertainties.
And no Man that profefs'd and called him-
felf a Chriftian ever disbelieved the Scrip-
tures, but there were vifibly other Reaibns
for it than thefej which the Nature of the
Chriftian Religion could afford : It was ap-
parent in his Life, that he wifhed the Chri-
ftian Religion were falfe, before he endea-
voured to perfuade himfelf that it is not true.
Some are poftefs'd with that intolerable Spi-
rit of Pride and Contradiction, that meer Va-
nity and a Conceit of being wifer than others
makes them find fault with any thing that is
generally received; and the greateft Fault
which thefe Man can find with the Chriftian
Religion is, that they have been bred up in
it, and therefore »thcy make heavy Com-
plaints of the prejudices of Education, and
the
$JO The Reajonai/enefs and Certainty
the hindrances which ingenuous Minds la-
bour under, from the influences of it, m the
purfuit of Truth : And thele Men perhaps
might ha^ve talk'd as much, and to as much
purpofe, for Ghriftianity, as they now talk
againft it, if they had not been Born among
Chriftians, and been bred up in the Chriftian
Religion; they lcorn to be the better for
their Education, and are afhamed of nothing
more than to believe and think like other
Men ,* and they might almoft be periuaded
to be Chriftians ftill, if they could but be
• lingular in being fo : For. the mere Affecta-
tion of Singularity makes them difpife and
difpute againft any thing which others allow
and efteem. But it will be hard to find any
learned Man of tolejrable Modefty and Ver-
cue, arid who was not as lingular in other
things, and in his Notions of Religion, but
he has firmly believed the Divine Authority
of the Scriptures.
It concerns all, who have any Doubts about
thele things, to weigh the Objections with
the Anfvvers that have been given to them by-
divers Authors, and withal to obferve the
importance of the Objections, and how far
they afrecl: the main Caufe,* and ftill to re-
member, that it is at every Mans own
Peril, if he make a rafli and partial Judgment.
If our Faith could be of no Benefit or Advan-
tage to us, nor Infidelity any Prejudice, we
might take the fame Liberty to give Credit
or
of the Chrijlian Religion. . 571
or no Credit to what we read in the Bible,
that we ufe in the Reading all other Books,
and to receive or reject it as we think fit, or
to believe only juft fo much, as lies even
with" our own Underftandings and Notions
of Things, and at the worlt this would be
but Folly in us. fyit it is madnefs to rejecl:
our own Happinefs, and make our felves
miferable, becaiife we do not perceive the
Reafons of all the Means and Methods, which
God has been pleafed to ufe to -make us
happy ; or are not able to underfland every
Word of that Book, which contains the
Terms of our Salvation.
This is as if a Son mould chufe to live mi-
ferably, rather than to. enjoy a large Eftate
left him by his Father, becaufe he doth not
perceive the defign and full meaning of every
particular in his Will ,• he fearches out for all
Ways and Arts for cavilling at it, and is fond-
of any pretence to cafl it afide as Counter-
feit, being refolved never to believe it to be
his Father's ; For his Father was a wife Man,
and if it were his, fuch and foch Claufes
would not be in it, fince there is no teafon,
that he can fee, why they ihould be. inler-
ted ; feveral things mentioned in it, he be-
lieves are mif-timed, the Bounds of the
Lands are not defcribed by fit Names ; be-
fides it is interlined, and he never will accept
of fuch an Eftate conveyed to him by fuch a
Will j but chufes rather to be miferable ail
the
5 7 2 ' The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
the Days of his Life. This would be fuch
pcevifhnefs and perverfnefs, as is not to be met
withal, where our Temporal Intereft is con-
cerned : But too many are too forward to
rejedt the Tenders, and defpitc the Terms of
an everlafting Inheritance in Heaven, tho'
at the fame time they bacome obnoxious to
all the Curfes threatned to Unbelievers, bc-
caufe the Old and New Teflament contain
fbme things which may afford matter of • Ex-
ception and Cavil to captious Men.
God has lent his Prophets to call, and ad-
monifh us, and his Son, to reconcile us to
himfelf, by his Death ; and to offer us E-
ternal Peace and Happinefs, and he has giv-
en us all the Evidence of it, that the nature
' of the things would admit. The Jews have
averted the Authority of the Old Teftament
from the times of Mofes, and the Prophets ;
and the Chriliians afTerted the 'Truth of the
Gofpel, when it was impoflible for them not*
toknow whether it were true or not; without
any profped: of Advantage by it in this
World ; but'with a certain expectation of all
manner' of Torments and Deaths; and the
greateft part of the Known World, was con-
verted to the Belief of it, and became Chrilii-
ans ; when in this World, Chriflians were of
all Men the mo;i miferabley and were fupport-
ed only by the ftedfaft hope and expecta-
tion of that Happinefs which is promifed to
us in the Scriptures after this Life. At)d all
things
of the Cbrijlian 'Religion. 573
things confidered, we have as fufficient
Grounds for the Authority of the Scriptures,
as we have, not only that any other Book •
was compoied by the Author, w'hoic Name
it bears, but as we have to believe any thing
elfe in the World. Nbw what do thefe Men ?
•
How do they receive fo great a Bleffing >
Why, they overlook all the Evidence that
can be brought to prove the Divine Authority
of the Scriptures, and fearch up and down for *
doubtful and obfcure PafTages to difprove it
by ; not confidering in the mean time, that
nothing can overthrow their Authority, buc
that which can invalidate the Evidence, by
which it is eftablifh'd. It would be the high-
eft Folly and Ingratitude thus to defpife ■
God's Mercy and Care over us, if there were
no danger in it, but it being a thing of infi-
nite Danger, it is no lcfs than Madnefs : For
what milder Term can be found to exprels
the defperate Folly of them, who reject a
Book, which fcts before us the means of Sal-
vation, but at the fame time forewarns us
upon pain of the fevereft efFedts of God's
Difpleafure, not to neglect them : It is mad-
nefs, I fay, if we rightly confider it, to re-
ject fuch a Book, and at once both to af-
front the Mercy, and defpife the Threatnings
. of the infinitely Merciful, and the infinitely
Gneat and Powerful God.
It is a good Caution to the Atheift to for-
bear his Blalphemies, and Contempt of the
Divine
574 "FlJe Reafinab/enefs and Certainty
Divine Majefty, for fear it fhould prove
true, that there is a God, at laft, and then
it will be a difmal thing after all his profane
Talking and Arguing to be called before that
God, whom he has ib often denied. And it
is as good Advice to .thofe, who make it.
their bufinefs to find Fault with the Scrip-
tures, to confider ferioufly whether they are
fure that thefe are not God's Word, after
all that can be laid againfl them ; and if they
be not ablblutely certain of this, the Name
and Title, which they bear, and which
Men as wife and as Judicious as themfelves,
thought to belong to them, fhould methinks
keep Men within ibme bounds of Modefty,
and D'ifcretion. For if they be indeed the
Word of God (and nothing is capable of be-
ing made more cviden: ) than how dearly
mud they pay for a little cavilling Wit and
Subtilty 1 The bed and moft Divine things
may be defpifed and affronted by a bold and
Scurrilous Wit, tbut can Men think it a fafe
or a prudent* thing to ridicule and Scoff at
thofe Books, which, for ought they know,
may be of Divine Revelation, when all the
Reafon, of which they fanfie themfelves fo
great Matters, can never be able to confute,
the Arguments brought in Vindication of
them ? Can they value the contemptible Re-
putation of a little Satyr and Drollery, at that
mighty Rate, as to run the hazard of being
damned for it?
If
of the Cbriflian Religion. 5 7 ^
If Men have any real Doubts or Scruples,
they mufl needs grant, that* it is too ferious
a thing to jeft and trifle withal, when no
lefs than the Terms of our everlafling Hap-
pinefs, or everlafling Mifery is the thing
in Controverfy. And what Wit there may
be in it, I cannot tell ; but I am lure it is no
* fign of a very Wife Man to fpeak contempti-
bly of a Book, by which he can never prove,
but that he mull be judged at thelaft Day.
As a Mad-Marty fays Solomon, who cafleth
Fire-brands, Arrows, and Death; Jo is the
Man that deceiveth his Neighbour, and faith,
Am not I in Sport? Prov. xxvi. 18, 19. But
what Defcription or Comparifon can be found
equal to his Madneis, who deceiveth and de-
flroyeth. himfelf, arid that Eternally, and
yet fays, Am not I in Sport ? Is not this the
%very perfection of Wit and Raillery ?
Wo unto him, that S trivet h with his Maker
Ifai, xlv. 9. Do they provoke me to anger, faith
the Lord, do they not provoke themfeves to the
Confujion of their own Faces ? Jer. vii. 19. And
thou {halt know, that I am the Lord, and that
I have heard all thy Blafphemies. Thus with
your Mouth ye have boajled "againfi me, and have
Multiplied your Words againji me, I have heard
them, Ezek. xxxv. 12, 13. Do we provoke the
Lord to Jealoufy, are we flronger than hc\ 1
Cor. x. 2.z.
There fhall come in the laft days Scoffers^
walking after their own Lufls, z Pet. iii. 3.
But-
57^ The Reafonablenefs and Certainty
But Beloved, rememler ye the Wordsi which
were jpoken before of the Apo files of our Lord J e-
fus (Thrift, how that they to[dyouy there fhould
he Mockers in the laft time, who fhould Walk
after their own ungodly Lufts, Jude 17. 18. If
all that I have difcourfed be infufficient to
convince thefe Men ; yet let their own Ar-
guments, and even their own Blafphemies '
convince them ; for the very word that they
can lay or do, ferves to fulfil the Prophe-
cies, and confirm the Authority of the Holy
Scriptures.
FINIS.
■
(577 )
ADDENDA
The BOOK having been long ago fitted
for the Prefsj and out of the Author" 's
Cujiodjj he could not infert the follow-
ing Additions in their proper places,
CHAP. TV. p. 112. /. 3. after St. Mark
and St. Luke add, If either in the E-
piftle of St. Barnabas, or St. Clement, it be
iuppofed that the Realbning is not always
juft, but is ibmetimes too Allegorical, and
ibmetimes founded upon Miflakes in Natu-
ral Philofophy ; yet it is certainly agreeable
to the ways of Reafoning, and the Philofo-
phy of that Age, fo that nothing of this
kind could then be any hindrance or preju-
dice to the Reception of thefe Epiftles.
C HA P. X. p. ziz. I uli. after Principles ,
add, And befides other Ules, which may
be found out hereafter, one very confidera-
ble has been already made of the Satellites^
for the benefit of the World, in rectifying
Geography, and determining the Longitude Ca\f^0n
of Places, (a) M. Qaffini has drawn up Tables Burguad
for this Purpofe, and Written a Treatife on T°m- '•
r> 1 c. 8. Dif-
P P thefts
r 578)
Com^stlie SubJe#- And the(W Miffionaries by
mS;™, their Obfervations, have difcovcred, that
f. \$. Wthe Empire of China, is Five Hundred Leagues
nearer Europe, than Geographers have placed
it.
CHAT. XI. />. 126. /. %J. after Opinion,
add. The fame Words which Jofbua ufed,
is Tranflated to wait upon, and wait for, PC
LXII. 1. LXV". 1. So that all which can
be Concluded from the Word is, that the
Sun attende/1, he lengthned the Day, and
waited for the Victory, or waited upon die
Army of IfraeL
CHAP. XIII. p. z$6. I 24. after Chrift's
fake, add, A State of Damnation is a State
of Death ; and the Soul which lies under the
Divine Wrath, is in that State, tho' it be
not irreverfible during this Life. So that
the Death Threatned, being Twofold, viz.
of the Soul, and of the Body, it was accor-
dingly infli&ed on both : But it was not
Threatned, that this Death fhould be to the
final DeftrucStion either of Soul or Body ;
but thro* the Redemption of Chrift, the Bo-
dy might be recovered from the Death, to
which it became Subject, to a Blefled and
Glorious Refurredfaon, and the Soul be re-
(tored from the Death, into which it had
fain, to a State of Reconciliation and Favour
with God.
CHAP. XV, p. 325-. /. 15. after in the
New, add, Of the Affiftance of Divine Grace,
we
(579)
weareTaught,D<?^r.XXX. 6. Pfalm.XXV:
4.XXVII ii. LI. 10,11, 12. LXXXVI. 11.
CXIX. 12, 26, 33, 64, 66, 68. 108. 124.
135-. CXLIII. 10. Prov. 1. 23. Ifa.XUV.
3. lix. xi. y^r. xxxr. 8. xxxu. 40.
Ezek. XT. 19. XXXVI. 26, 27.
CHAP. XVI. />. 338. /. 10. after Reli-
gion^ add, The Soveraignty was in due time
to be placed in the Tribe of Judah ; which
was fulfilled in David's being advanced to
the Kingdom, and from that time the Scep-
ter and the Lawgiver, &c.
CHAP. XXI l, />. 391. /. $.-afterexpeft-
ed, add, The Duration of tjie World is
confidered in the Scriptures, with relation to
Chrift's coming, and all the Time after his
coming is (tiled the lc# Days ; as in the De-
icription of the Different States of^'sLife,
the fpace of an Hundred and Forty Years
of it, after his Sufferings, is Stiled the fatter
end of his Life ; and all the precedent part
is Termed the Beginning of it. Job. XLII.
12, 16.
CHAP. XXVIII. p. 486. /. after Pro-
phet Jonas, add, Dr. Lightfoot in his Remains
lately publifhed, has oblerved, as the Rea-
ibn, why the Jews were lb importunote for
a Sign, notwichflanding the many Miracles
which our Saviour Wrought before them ;
That their Traditions Taught them to ex-
peel: thefe two Signs of the Mejftas, when he
came, viz. that he mould raife the Ofd
Pp 2 Pro-
Prophets, and other Holy and famous Men
from the Dead, and that he fhould bring
down Manna for them from Heaven. In
their Old Writings and Records, he fays,
they fpeak much of thefe Two things of
their Expectation. I am inclined to believe
that thefe Traditions, if they had been right-
ly underilood, were not fo blind and foolifh,
as that Learned Author Stiles them, but had
refpeel: to the very Time and Occafion, to
which our Saviour refers the Jews, when
they required thefe Signs of him. For at
his Refurreclion many Bodies of Saints ', which
Slept, aroje, Matt, xxvii. fx. And fpeak-
ing to them of the Manna, or Bread which
came down from Heaven, he puts them in
Mind of his Afcenfion : What, and if ye fhall
fee the Son of Alan*ajcend up where he was be^
fore? Joh- vi. 6z. Whereby he intimates,
that then would be the time offending this
Manna, when upon his Afcenfion, he Would
beftfcw the Gifts of the Holy Ghoft. The
time was not yet come for thefe Miracles to
be wrought, they were not to be wrought
at their Demand ; it was fufficient that they
had Intimations given to expeel: them, and
in the mean time they ought to have been
contented with others.
CHAP. XXX. p. 519, L ix. after he
pleafed, add, But it feems mod of all ftrange,
that the excellent Emperour, M. Antoninus,
who had fo much of the Chriftian Morality,
rboth
C 5 8 i )
both in the Speculation, and in the Practice
of it, mould not alfo be of the Chriftian
Faith, efpecially, if he owned, that a fignal
Miracle was by the Prayers of the Chrifti-
ans, obtained for the deliverance of himfelfj
and his whole Army, (a) as Tertulliany who (a) apoi.
could not be Ignorant of the Truth of it, De- c. $> ad
clares. Scapc-*'
But it fhould be confidered, that M. Anto-
ninus was very fuperftitious in all the Heathen
Worihip, and was lb much addicted to the
(F) Sophifls of his time, as not only to en- ^ vkao-
dure, but often to humour, their Infolenccftr- Vit.
and Vanity ,• and from them he had his No- fj^- *
tions of Philofbphy, Which agree with theHermag.
Chriftian Doctrine, and not from the Scrip- ^[H*
tures. For he owns in his Book, from whom
he had received his Precepts ; but if he had
Read and confidered the Scriptures, he could
never have looked upon theZeal andFortitude
of the Chriftian Martyrs, as (c) Obftinacy . 0) ub.i j
But the Sophifls who made it their bufinefs to* 3#
oppofe the Gofpel, knew, they could not
better recommend themfelves to him, than
by Teaching its Moral Doctrines, and pre-
venting that efteem, which he muft needs
have had of the Chriftian Religion, if he had
known, that to this thofe Doctrines, which
he Co much admired, owed either their Ori-
ginal or Improvement.
Whatever opinion he had of the Chrifti-
ans, he was wont to attribute too much to
: his
(582)
(J)Vnlc*thi$ own (J) Virtue and Piety , to alcribe his
n Clffio- deliverance wholly to their Prayers. And
afcer all the Praifes, which have been
juftiy given to M. Antoniw, it rhuft be ac-
knowledged,that he valued himfelf extreamly
uponTwoThings,which were very great hin-
derances to his Reception of the Gofpel.i'/::.
(c) Capi--p^ r€^ Study of Philofophy, and the Love
and efteem of his People. For it is no Won-
der, that an Emperour, who made the Phi-
lofophy of thofe times his Study, the So-
phifts his chief Favourites, and Popularity
his Aim, fhould not be Converted to a Reli-
gion lb unpopular, and fo oppofite, in fome
of its Principal Articles, to that which the
World calledWifdom,
It is unconceiveable upon what Principles
of Religion or Philofophy this Emperour
tf)iJ- could Deify if) Lucia* Merits and Faufiha;
but it was lmpoffibic, that he could do this,
and be at the fame time a Chriftian ; that the
fame Man, who Deified Notorious Wicked-
nefs, becaufe it had been Cloathed in Purple,
and fhined in Emperial Robes, ihould believe
in the Son of God Crucified, is utterly in-
confillcnt.
ft,) Aug; IB' P'5Z7- '-3- after at att, acU, (a)
iriclorinus^ a Man of very great Learning,
8'-2 and who, upon mat account, had his Statue
erected in the Forum at Rome; often acknow-
ledged himfelf convinced of the Truth of
Chnftianiry, before Le could be pcrfuaded o-
pcnly
(583)
penly to profefs k, for fear of difpleafing his
Friends that were Gentiles. He pretended'
he might be a Chriftian as well in Secret,
and this no doubt might be the cafe of ma-
ny others, who never made open Profeflion
of it.
IB. p. f}0. /. 7. after with them add, The
Doctrines of the Epicureans and the Stokks
(he fpeaksofluchas were peculiar to either
Sedt, were little regarded in St. AHftws time,*
and none durft maintain them, but under the
Denomination of tome Herefy or other,*
thefe Two Seels, then were in lo little efteem,
that they had not Authority enough to give
thole errors any countenance, which they be-
fore had lo long with great fubtilty and fuc-
cefs defended againfl the Ylxtoniffs ; but they
who would gain any Reception to their er-
rors were at lad forced to aiTume the Name
of Chriftians, and betake themfelves to fome
Herefy. Of Vlotinuss School fome became
Chriftians, and others applyed themfelves to
Magick; zsvlotinus himlelfmuft have done,
if we believe all that Porphyry Writes of
him. The Relation of the Serpent, winch
was feen under the Bed and then was obfer-
ved creeping into a hole of the Wall, as he
gave up the Ghofl, is an odd Story.
FINIS.
BOOKS Printed for, • and Sold
by Teeter "BucI^
THE Reafonablenefs and Certainty of
the Chriftian Religion. Book I. By
Rohert Jenkin, &c.
Reflections upon Ancient and Modern
Learning. By William Wot ton. B. D. Chap-
lain to "the Right Honorable the Earl of AV-
tingham. The Second Edition, with large
Additions.
The Characters or Manners of the Age.
Written Originally in French by Monfieur
de la Bruyere, to which is added, a Key in
the Margeht ; made Engli/b by feveral Hands,
with the Characters of TheophtaJtus. Tran-
slated from the Greek. The Second Edition
Corrected throughout, and inlarg'd.
A Dictionary of the Greek and Roman An-
tiquities, explaining the Religion, Mytholo-
gy, Hiftory, Antient Chronology, Geogra-
phy, Sacred and Profane Rites and Cu-
floms, Laws, Policy, Art and Engines of
War, Opinions of their Philofophers, Lives of
Inventers of Arts and Sciences, and others
famous for them or Arms ; containing whatso-
ever is neceflary for Elucidating, the abftrufe
paflage which Occur in the Claftical Authors
and Hiftorians, CompiledOriginally in French
by theCommand of the King of France for the
Ufe oftheDaupbin, D. of Bou>gundyyAnjou and
Berry, by Mr. Danet, and now made Englijk,
with the Addition of Ufeful Maps.
<