Skip to main content

Full text of "Fish and Wildlife Management Report October 1, 1955"

See other formats


- 


ape SoM 
nN ean 


October 1, 1955 


ish 


1 AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 
REPORT 


PROVINCE OF ONTARIO 


"DEPARTMENT OF LANDS AND FORESTS 


“Division of Fish and Wildlife 


Clare E. Mapledoram F. A. MacDougall 
Deputy Minister 


TABLE OF CONTENTS 


Moose Investigations in the Perrault Falls Area During 


the Summer of 1954. 
= by A. T. Cringan, W. Je D. Stephen and J. Elbrink 


An Analysis of the Sex Ratio of Timber Wolves Killed 


in 1948 and 1949, - by A. deVos 


Status of Wolves in Tweed District, 1954. 
- by H. G. Lumsden 


Report on Discussion With J. D. Robertson, Manitoba 
Predatory Control Officer, The Pas Manitoba, July 4, 
Ds S; ieee - by R. Simkoe 


Report on Helicopter Survey of Caribou on Slate . 
Islands. - by H. G. Cumming 


Computation of Current Potential Rates of Reproduction 
of White-tailed Deer from Checking Station Data. 
- by A. T. Cringan 


Waterfowl Notes from Lake of the Woods. 
- by H. EB. Deedo and H. G. Lumsden 


Wildlife Management Plans in County Forests. 
one by aie Jes Gage 


Tweed District Ruffed Grouse Brood Counts, 1955. 
- by P. A. Thompson 


Species Composition of Western Region Waterfowl Bag, 
—19$4~ - by A. T. Cringan 


Raccoon Hunting in Southern Ontario. 
- by H. G. Lumsden 


1S) 


18 


Pal 


23 


Au 


BY 


34 


BS 


37 


38 


cer ey 
Pea] 
ft 
Pl ter. 
‘ ‘ 
: +9) 
ne - 
i. 
m aly ; 
¢ 
n r 
ye i 
~ 
= f 
co ’ 
F: ‘ 
j t 
' 


- + . 
Rare i ty ae | 
eS ee evwva s > + 
e y 
<¥ 
oir tice (= 
; , t 
‘i ‘ OT: ah to belt 
Ly : © ‘ 
ay j it , 
R! Spe He 
i 
ms on 
r i, 
rr 5 ba 
‘ ioe Pa 
’ ’ 
sre) 
a i 
ay Veit gh ae 1 ‘ pedi a8 9s, 
Beene : Ae 
vo 2 
f ots me i rv 
yea eb ah phe 
at's i tes Meee ye kl Be Ae he 
| 9 sr 
Ci yy iE > ie 
\ 7 rar, 
Pan eae 4 % . 
Poa f 
+ ¥ ‘ 
a 
as 
’ 
= 
f 
i 3 
: 
ca aha, 
f ye 1 
“ s 
a 
: fm 


” 
due 
oa 4 
Bit ; } oe | 


i Gam ie ears ae Ld \* Ae i 
Op eT ty ay PP ees cates ase 4 pas ey ROG ip 
uae = oF, 8 eget 


Sle 


Report on the Waters of the Rob Roy Trout Club 
- by J. F. Gage 43 


Management of Game Fish. - by H. Re McCrimmon L8 


(THESE REPORTS ARE FOR INTRA~DEPARTMENTAL 
INFORMATION AND NOT FOR PUBLICATION) 


Digitized by the Internet Archive 
in 2013 


http://archive.org/details/resourcemanoct1955onta 


aye 


MOOSE INVESTIGATIONS IN THE PERRAULT FALLS AREA 
DURING THE SUMMER OF 1954. 


by 
A. T. Cringan, W. J. D. Stephen and J. Elbrink 


Introduction 


A field party, engaged in moose investigations, 
worked in the Perrault Falls area during part of the summer 
of 1954. J. Elbrink was present from June 29th to August 
7ths, and W. J. D. Stephen from July 7th to August 7th.. 
They were accompanied by R. Shuttlewood, July 7th - 28th.. 
Dr. A. de Vos and A. T. Cringan acted in supervisory capa-= 
cities, Dr. de Vos from July 7th - 9th., and A. T. Cringan 
Saiye7the= 9th, 12th = 14th, 16th - 18th, 26th = 28th, 
and August 4th - 7th.. This report concerns the work of 
the July 7th - August 7th period. 


While moose investigations were the main objec- 
tives of the work, incidental observations of waterfowl and 
other wildlife were also recorded. These form the contents 
of other reports. Principal objectives, as far as moose 
are concerned, were? 


- sex-age composition of the herd through 
observations. 

calf counts 

moose movement study through observations; 
continuation of moose marking experiments; 
moose behaviour and food habits studies. 


In addition to the work of the field party, 
moose observation cards had been distributed to Tourist 
Outfitters within the area, for recording the observations 
of their customers. The results of this effort are included 
in this report. Shortly after the completion of field work, 
A. T. Cringan and E. H. Stone engaged in helicopter flights 
over the same area. The results of these flights, and also 
of Cringan*s October, 1953 helicopter flights, are also 
included for comparative purposes. 


Certain parts of the field program were designed 
so as to tie in with work done by Dr. A. de Vos at Missinaibi 
Lake in the Chapleau District during 1952 and 1953. 
References to this work are made in the appropriate places. 


mm 


" .Wt8S = ddOS (ARE = deed age aes 


Iso Yroetvyecie om bédon oagaito eT ah a 


00m es Wl eB ~asvEisoatido Learonhaa same 


ATHA 


sitet 19 favo epi puTaUd 


= aes bie ae i ea e. 


YG: ihe 
Anindia .t bas sane Gah .W 18RD oh 


~ 


cotter idgoviant- eedom! ak ‘feanuea: “nt sq bis 
Je att to ore watarb Beda: ane 


tana 
auth OF ACS ecb most tnuseowq wa wierd eee 

) Jeugua oft. tty youl mort edged) ot ae 
~-d9) yiul ,booweldyude <f vd Barmeae 


7 


Py) «i A BAe ‘ eHde = Hoy elct aOorxt - v#oV.7< 
a Ow sit Bm eonos Pro ae Gale E fa ie * snge: ro 
ae See hosed. aay Jarra . 


ido ctam ond yew saolenue daevnt SBCOME. af 
wortstew Te - ena wiseda Javaebroang’ ae 
105 iJ mol sead’t J Rbebtoden oe is Saas 


1 2Tee of 


it Baad ody to iSbeoam 105 ohanxbérs 
enol sevteedos 

. : ; 2onwes tieo - 
noljsvisede Aue woete: diemevor agen ae. 
fevn rsqxe uitdtam Seooe to so r2BUReaaoeeee ae. 
estbute edited boot pns-molveded s200mr 


(Vi1sd blert edd 1o anew edd ad noLsibbe vasbd , 


Ys iH DB ebiss OLE 
BV i or ({BOSB CATs 
£0 ieee - tthe 
f . agrees vlinode oes 
' tS CS i ss HO GTy a Be Me al hea 


18 ~stdellt seode teow eiivest' of) .ROUR: 
[fs ot6 ,etenilt eseeg tien -2¢' Lf <tpiago0 a" 
; i ; ake Ba 1, XU “4 oViGg fihiae ic: To; 


seb. stew mersotq biett eng tovadnaq: aihies ‘one 
iM 3a. 2o¥ ob sA ot wh -snob aanow Asie: st sid oF 

ed 5 Set c “itiyih Ato lee ER: yee Lesa ede f 
fo ; tage od tt obpm ste avow Sind Of0me 


~~ 
a 


=o 


Field Methods 


The party operated from Perrault Falls from July 
7th = 17th, from Cedar Lake Ranger’s Headquarters July 17th 
- 26th, from the north end of Wabaskang Lake July 26th - 
August 5th, and from Perrault Falls, August 5th - 7th. 


The general procedure was to travel along lakeshores 
and rivers, by canoe and 5 H.P. outboard motor, searching 
for moosee Travel was therefore restricted to lakes, and 
the larger, more easily navigable streams. The marking 
experiments were run concurrently, and made it necessary 
that certain areas be revisited every other day. These were 
Ord Creek, July 8th - 25th, and the Cedar River north of 
Wabaskang Lake, July 27th - August 5th. 


Three forms of notes were kept - a daily log, a 
moose observation description, and a marking station record. 
The daily log comprised a record of times, route and distance 
travelled, a brief weather summary, and a list of game 
seen. The moose observation description included the date, 
time and location of each observation, the kind of moose, 
its distinguishing features, its behaviour and feeding 
habits, and an account of the weather at the time of observa- 
tion. Each time a marking station was revisited, work notes 
and results notes were made. 


Sex-age Composition of the Perrault Falls Moose Herd 


The field party made 20 observations of either 
Single moose or small groups of moose, comprising 29 
Sightings of 21 different moose. Observations, excluding 
those considered as repeats, are summarized in Table I, 
together with observations resulting from helicopter surveys 
and those reported by the public. 


ud ican aie 

vias mort ellet wip ated hor’: ‘baserego. yit8q iF B 
Eth ese Sreupheell. & Vreangeh oe swwebsd- 
~ At0S Vinh SaBd: aneleadav. 26! bee tronm one 
SI ge: etek, 4 OLLB% Wiversel: mart ‘boe:. 


yonzodsl gcoie: coverd og. eave. serubelorg: Leteonene: est 
ontdo+see » TOPOM binoddsp.. Eh 2 bis. .otao Yes 
bose ,sevel of. bedodtteet eroteist? sax” Lover? 
zintteam:set: ’ eopette. oidasiven yitere. ero 
yTseesoen wf eben. bas vidneriones: Aer: Rdlesi - 
eyow ceont -areab seddo! yreve bedietves od. eran 
to fdwon -reyha tebed sao bas deck: = Age: 
dt Yargud o AgTS Ting ve 


; nol: viteb s » dged stew wegen To sarmped 
byover- motisaise pote 6 fae .pOlogiaees OES 
deib bas stvor ,esmty to broest & pee x: 
oman: lo dett & pis. -. wrstieiie yetisew tebe 
,oteh odd: baby fons aeteal broash. NOXTEVISEGO SEH 
,ezoom ‘te brid edt  noldsvreada oes: te nots 
ueitbest bos Awolverned asl. eeuntses nab 
roedo to. smid sid oe eatiteen edd. to Sago n ee 
oten Ayow ,botdieiver sew molésse yates ‘omen ae 
sORSi -oY OW oa 


Of. 


or 


i tiugured ado tos 


; + ar a rr 
e bel > oorny F 
OVSh BeOow B is 
os ALE Eg a meh ly 


isitile to enoideyrsedo OS bspuinigiont trae. DLOLF oat 
OS aiba Degmas eSEOOm . tO: Bae isdn / Lethe .WO-s 
DULOKE BOLT EWS sed. .cevom..tcsrettsh Le 


Ll aidst at bos twemaie one ,otRaqet BB: beriebl Lene 
vrua notoooilon mort anktivees enolierieeaaas bes 


oitdug seating: bodxoger 


4 OOT = W OS W SEE fd OL: W SE HG6T Sot tqnd Ag 

4 OOT = W 479 W B6€ eee a 6 HG6T Saeqdoottey Ag 

4d OOT ° W EE W %S2 Cl es ae 7 466, ‘Aaued prety Ag 
orqey xeGg ATNpy 
pue SutyTreey 

4d OOT * W 6% W SEE Ch (Cys, 2 InN Whe HG6T Sottqnd Ag 

4 OOL ° W SY W STE a 3 it S HG6T ‘aeqdoottTey Ag 

al OONE 38 aN An W %2T GE 7a rail HG66L ‘Agued pret Ag 
SeTewuoy OOT 48d Solel SOTe QUusoOted Hol ToTaey oTSseg OT IeYy xX9S YLNpVy 


peatsesqo ssoow fO SOTIeI ose pue xeg — [TT WIgvVs 


‘TI STqeL UT UeATS o1e [ STGQe] WOIZ PeATJep soTyed oe pue xes uTeqIE9 


68T 9€ i 6 6 (eye ey TE HG6T ‘Atne -— Ae fotTqnd Ag 
69 Lal at if + L €T Tl HG6T ‘Artur Sottqnd Ag 
Tg 6 G 4 Le 91 LT 4G6T ‘eune Sottqnd Ag 
6€ Ta € I z Cl 9 W661 ‘AeW fottaqnd Ag 
AT z T z € zZ HG6T £02 — 6T °900 ‘2eqadooTTSH 
tz 4 @ i TI G q766t “te = 6 “say “teqdooT oH 
liz € G i € € T 1G¢/9 °soy - 2 Atop SAqreg plot 
SssooWw uMOUyY ST [Ng SiOo) Leia) 2a na) SMOQ STTnNg UOTICWUIOFUT FO SdInNOG 
Teq0] “U)) Grp evap OMT suOe A npy es 4impy 
osy -ceex -cte9k YITM UITM STSUTS 
® XG SMO9D SMOD 


peAtesgqo essoow fO ose pue xeg — T AIEGVL 


eo 2 “aideT NP ceva 


i. : 
% DOL ¢s 
7 OOL-: 


ae 
~, 

“3s 'P'? 
e. 
Me 


me 
_— 


ee re © 


7%, 


DSVISEGO SeoOt to Botset oss. f 
ou : 


¥y Ove 
te ae 


eet aia 


~—= 


, 


5° | 
ae a 
in 


1QuA 2 
aa) on I90 5 


ee 


SY 62 = OL 
%8 Too weal 
4L5 uy leery 2 
Fle) UIIM SMOD FO JuUsdTEg SdATeg AO FTeD YITM SMOD 
$sSMO9Q 9TNpy TeIOL 
95 eG 20 : | Be 202 
6 60°0 ic Beck 
WE, We s Gi ok 
SMOD JLNpY MOO F[NpY SOATeEQ » SMOD ILNPY 
OOT Jed seaTte9 Jeg SseaTteg otqey otseg 
45% 2 ZL 2% $89 QS (Oe 3 WON 
Oi. = WGe esl uke 9) e771 
“NS 2 SBE s SBE G¢ *= 8s 8g 


Jie9 : Sut~aee, = FNpy 
oTVeY OTSseg 


-1- 


7S6T Sot Tqnd 
7G61T ‘1eqdootTey 
HG6T SAgued plety 


HG6T Sot tqnd 
HG6T S1eqdooTtTey 
4S66T ‘Aqaed plete 


4661 fot tqnd 
HG6T ‘req4dootTey 
HG6T SAqaed pTety 


Pa 


“ 
V9 bes te 


af 82 an 


wiht 


alba 


It is perfectly clear that no one method of 
collecting data yields good sex-age ratios, at least from 
such small samples. Reasons for this may lie in failure 
to classify moose properly, particularly by the public, 
and in behaviour differences in moose of different ages and 
sexes. 


The field party results indicated an unreasonably 
high proportion of yearlings, a probably low proportion of 
males, and what is likely a very accurate proportion of 
calves. The helicopter technique failed to disclose a 
proper number of calves, and may have produced too many 
observations of male moose. The public must have failed to 
recognize many yearlings as such, but otherwise, their reports 
lead to the establishment of very reasonable adult sex 
ratio and proportion of calves. Perhaps the very size of 
the public’s sample, it being four times as large as the 
field party and helicopter samples combined, accounts for 
its greater apparent accuracy in these two respects. 


: Individual observations of cows with calves are 
ivscued an Table Ill. 


TABLE Ili = Observations of cows with calves 


Byoeteid Party Date Time Place 
[ee wcow wieh twins July 9, 1954 92:00 AM Ord Creek 
(2) same as (1) July 11, 1954 8348 AM Ord Creek 
(So) same as (2) duly i395 tOeh5 AM Ord Creek 
Peecow with calf July 14, 1954 #9230 AM Wabaskang Lake 
(5) cow with calf Jui LOPeTo5, 7220’ AM Ord Creek 
(6) cow with calf July 27, 1954 72:45 AM Cedar River 


Byemelrcopcer, 1954 


(1) cow with calf Aug. 20, 1954 Evening Near Wabaskang 
Lake 


DPyenelicopter, 1953 


) cow with twins Oct. 19, 1953 Afternoon Ord Creek 
eal, cow with 
calf Oct. 19, 1953 Afternoon near Hole Lake 
) cow with twins 
same (1) Octw 120, 1953 Mornine Ord Creek 
) cow with calf Oct. 20, 1953 Morning Ord Creek 


J 
vroltat of etl vet she sat: em 


yiISm ood. bese pt te sven yeni bre ~eeVigo te: 


to beddem .enocon same elo. avait | et 
b teael ts eoitna egnsege: hoo ‘dae 


dvq add eek yinsluohiase ” oeiredot 


eons fiers ete to seoom. mt Sheth ae 


(ORB: oy 8. be dro tbar actubes hy et 
Oo. GOrRg. woul, Nidedony & & aunt lepey. 
to i ie SISITSOR iow. B Wheoksl 
& seoloe tb. beList oupiudoed ed oght 


=s 


{ B-) wii JeUM oildug ent s8oom Sinn ‘to hee 
: tics .sebwreddo gud adove ga eyttiuey ee ey 
98 Stub sidagozaay. yx8¥ te siendetidases 
to ose ite eat eqsitrot. ovine ‘to Moly Iq 
end ‘si 1ef of. Remit sweet ated ob ofc jane 
ot ginuosss. , beikdmas 2olyase aes bas y 
aot ows ehond mE. (Osos Sora 


7TH Bsvlsbo naw. awos ‘6.8 amos: jaeeanae fsubiv 


Heor) Berd oboe f €4es ote! 360 | tt} Srise 


TUE 9! 


ee aor: 


gow leo ondine ee 16. enot te wig 


© niet at ad 
SNE RR ERI Ae ep nmmenie man erin dp eee yee bse hi pean ene) = 
0 fA: OS e. AOOl 2 elev 
) bee if AheR ACOL: LL wiat 
fc) brO MAs PSOE altel: vel wires 
ade Lh ORY POCL: el whee 
bef A ORY Set OL: Wika 
fi ey eel VS viet 


j 0 enbwe om 
ay Se ee ot “fi 

Lory“ i soonved tl Fre Ee eke rete “Lie iy 
Bae  arehwe idee 


by aniiorod €eGL.,08 too tiss Ad iw W 


(655 


The Relationship of Moose Observations to Time of Day 


The work program was varied, so as to be in the 
field at different times of the day enough to establish 
whether moose are more likely to be seen at certain times 
than at others. All observations have been tabulated by 
time of day in Table IV. 


TABLE IV - Correlation between the number of moose 


observed per hour and the time of day. 
By picid. Party 


Total N@les OF No. of Moose 
Noe of Ni@ien Oi Moose Observed Per 
Time Observed Hours in Moose Observed Hour During 
(CD25. 0.): Field Observed Per Hour 3-Hour Periods 
Lh =- 5 AM aL O 0.00 
5 - 6 a 1 Osavk On k2 
(0.50) (x 
6 = 7 8 O 0.00 
7-8 a7, 7 OAL O27 
8 = 9 2s) 6 0.26 (OEB.0)) 
9 =-10 26 6 On23 
10 -11 ab, 5 OR: ORGANS 
11 -12 noon Peal O ORO (@.07) 
12 = 1 PM 16 O 0.00 
1-2 16 O ornele) OnO7, 
2-3 18) 3 @e23 (O52) 
3-4 ilealt O 0.00 
hw 5 10 O O00 OEO 
ee 6 8 0 0.00 (0.32) 
6-7 7 0 0.00 
7-8 8 O 0.00 0.00 
8-9 5 0 0.00 (O60) 
9 -10 3 al @238 ©520 
Ov. 1 PM Z O O200 (0367) 


wed to seme? re ic kzavised 

sd iy eh ok 88 OB  betaan, ove: ‘argon, 
dallcgdas od Avene ARR Shs -30 demre 
id sistteo 05 Seeeobe Of Miewre rol 

| bstsludsd ead eyed gnoijavtoade tr 


ty 


| 


ones Mery ye ne ow 
Sats eds Das, 


-, SBOOR:  - oO 40h 
barieado Baad 
"won tat - bevigedd 


OC e () 9 


¥ 104,090) 
er Bg "lias 
LS eR | 
t é ~ 
me LS ak 


By Helicopter 


No. of 
Now en Moose 
No. of Hours Moose Observed 
Date In Field Observed Per Hour 
morning Hee LOSI. MO Miles OD) MLN. 10 200 
afternoon Aug., 1954 5 hr. OO min. He On 
evening Rupee 95). 5 hr. 20) min. IVE PAS 
morning Octe, 1.9559 4 hr. 25 min. 10 Ree 
eacernoon, .Oct.s, 1953. .3-hr..40 min. 4 ea 


x Bracketed figures are those for de Vos’ 1952, 
Missinaibi Lake work.# 


Practically ali (83%) of the field party’s 
observations were made between 7 AM and 11 AM. This 
contrasts rather sharply with de Vos’ 1952 survey at 
Missinaibi Lake, when observations were made at the highest 
rate during the evening. Results of the two surveys are 
compared in the final column of Table IV. We cannot 
properly account for the differences yet, but one reason 
may be that the Missinaibi moose are relatively undisturbed 
by tourists whereas the moose in our study area are 
frequently bothered by anglers passing by in high-powered 
outboards. The fact that our best observation rates were 
made in the first half of July, as will be shown later in 
this report, adds weight to this contention. 


One moose was seen per 7.7 hours of field work, 
a value contrasting with one observation per 4.7 hours of 
field work during de Vos’ 1952 Missinaibi Study. 


Moose Movements 


During the 1954 summer field work, and both 
helicopter flights, we have collected a few repeat observa- 
tions of moose. These are as follows: 


By field party, 1954 


- Cow with twin calves, seen at 9:00 AM July 
wen, o-hs AM July Lith, and 10°45 AM July 13th: all 
observations at same place on Ord Creek, about half-mile 
below downstream portage; one of these calves also seen 
alone at 83:40 AM, July 13th. 


- Yearling cow, seen at 10330 AM, July 8th, and 


at 8:30 AM July 9th; at same place on Ord Creek, about 
quarter=mile below downstream portage. 


x See Fish & Wildlife Mgt. Rept. No. 24, Aug. 1, 1955. 


TO sO* LP 
SBooh 


awrcado- 


sol tad 


Pad 


Br Iy 


aid’ ett 


a Lee 
ft 0 ana 


“OxS, ava JG Cs CTE: Sdiiire ay ¥ 2aninove” ; x 
‘ so sw .WH sboer to siwfos InakD 23 
eno did , Gey eyo adi 10% SH 


e)eSa: 
HOaBSt 
Osis £3 


OTF 


rs au 
ea hy 
EO ESOr 
oJ it 
~ i] rf 
Lis 
ine TIE 


(se oL ‘20V eb sot enor 655. 8 eoauget A 


igi af yd geteeg - eres ‘yd bored 


mwonde Li rw 2 


(sft .26 atone tec: Mook egw S800m" Suan 
L. tO: a 


bas” ow Riek 
oder wo S hedoatios pe ‘ew peice 


, A OOS Ce Ree ae s¥iBo abws Adiw woo = 
‘ps coat th wit BA 2a ata De 18 
J & f as nee - 3 aye 


lo .on, 
“SOOM: 
bewiesdd 


OL tin a0 Pi 20 § 
at indin ns ete 
OL GaSe es 
are ac aa oad t 


eine ated : id ante 


as »fakt ede 46 tee) ie “yttnods 

MA LL 638 MA® ceewded obaa eae 
ove SOL YeoV. ob Adiw vigupde, Bere 
3s obsm bebe ee a iedw: ee 


viovise let ot8 eeoos.tdisnieere, odd 
BSS  Vhuse. "Ee ss seoom. att aserery 


no tae Nee 7 sto IBS tet edtas 


& ivicl to: tist Genie 
39.24.198609 iie od diglew ebbs yz 


Paw tog aot tevreado tO ach i wikeesTd 
yobuse sé ppmtselm Seek ve Aobueb- 


of ie 


mggminers AlOr ante gabautie 


awolio'l en sts saoht” att ae 


} > es: . 


3 old yale we 
Y Fiods Assad one) AQ. Saka ome i 
In saaviso saedt oo ao. ceasdtoq ide wrdes 

AGEL eft MA Oe Be 


z, 


4 


1,° MA Of20L os oan awed . sie tuael - 

0 be Bo aoslq.omee te ¢dee viol. Mar o€28 
sundried nAOLS etwOb wolsd- of tier 

a 


A hye 
Ac, 


IK hae agen Ugh sisibliwt 2 der eeu 


> 


Ege 


By helicopter, 1954 


- adult cow, seen during evening August 19th and 
morning August 20th., in bush near west end Peephole Lake. 


- adult cow with yearling cow, first seen at 
6:00 PM, August 2lst, standing in alder thicket near junction 
Highway 105 and Camp Robinson Road, subsequently seen at 
7305 PM, in same place, but lying down. 


By helicopter, 1953 


- cow with twin calves, seen during afternoon of 
October 19th, and again in same place on the morning of 
October 20th, on Ord Creek. 


The field party produced remarkably few repeat 
observations, in view of the intensity with which certain 
areas were covered. Ord Creek was covered on July 8, 9 
Setecreebiel3, 15 17, 19, 20, 21, 23 (twice) and 25th 
- or 13 times altogether, yet only poouG or LO dit nerent 
moose seen there (cow with twin calves, and yearling cow) 
were seen oftener than once. 


The 1954 helicopter flights were designed so as 
to reduce duplication of coverage, and render repeat observa- 
tions unlikely. Ord Creek was flown twice within 16 hours 
and yielded no repeat observations. Keynote Lake was 
flown twice within 16 hours, and different moose were seen 
during both flights. 


This technique does not seem too satisfactory for 
the study of movements, as identification is based on human 
memory, which is somewhat fallible. Future efforts, if 
continued, may well include photography of moose seen to aid 
in recognition. 


Seasonal Variation in Rate of Moose Observations 


Most observations, 69%, were made during the first 
ll days of the field party's work, as shown in Table V. 


bus dces Sea BIiieve niitwh age 
ete. efodgeset bap Jesw. BSH tell #0 ah oS 
te nose Jetl? .WOo Rtiieey | 
nottosvt, teed tenokag, aebls rh Baths 
13 nese. yismenpasdye , DBOR. moentdng 
Wok paix gad utes 


to noontedTs gata. NERS | geovien niws vidw Woo 
To -salmrom eat TG OSB Site Tek - ay EO ee 
i : “eaetd YO: fie:. 


a 


$e oches wea yidaritamet beomborg eevee bieti 
ingsoo foltdw tthe yoehenesni sig Te wey: at ae 
Cu, 0: viel nO betsves eew esto BIO =e 
AgeScbe 1a. (93 bw): £8 ,18 (OR OL (Ti oe 
ere 1 Ts b OL NG ‘Soro a TiN FGV «tedtage 
(wrens - aShE f IBD: bre  ,2orles Siwy ALLE ‘wot )¢ 
. oC ia ‘Bond Fad xened 


es. oo boustesh sew etda hry serdos 5 ELor Agee | 
~syreedo Jsegey Tebiet bik gematsvoo To: hate 
ic it nrdtiw sofer nwolt: aew tese0. DIO ay 
sew otal acon oa .anotsarigeds seme ¢ 
1998, Grew seoom IWNete TEED Ds YEU 


1Gi yaogoB te LIRe. OO Mee. fom BSon oupa ndaer ‘a é 
stud: ac borad) ab ne tdaae LESS se on pets ee vor 
th ,gdaotts enn ho oes GEL Cis vB IWOROR Bt 

ah a¢eg aeoom TD wigan 0 fori ‘ohuty one: Law x 


20 S3BH 
‘tinh oben stew .ee0° snot aeyieeees 
beky (< (wode da saw et yisad: Die ee 


Boe 


TABLE V = Relationship between period of observation 
and number of moose observed. 


Date NO Or 
Nos of NO. OL Percent Cumulative Moose 
By Field Hrs. In Moose Moose % Moose Observed 
Party Field Observed Observed Observed Per Hour 
July 7-10 34 6 21% 21% Oaks) 
July 11-17 60 14 L8&% 69% O23 
July 18=24 ne rn 14% 83% 0.08 
July 25=31 L7 5 17% 100% Ova: 
Aue. l= 6 31 © 0% - OZO0 
Total 22k rmZ9 100% - OntZ5 


ByanMer copter 


NiGis) OF; No. of Moose 
No. of Hours Moose ' Observed 
Date In Field Observed Per Hour 
Oct. 19-20, 1953 8 hr. 55 min. ney Page 
Aug. 19-21, 1954 DES hr. 25 mine AS Idi 
Total 2h enes 20) man. Cain Les 


The decline in rate of observation is probably due 
to several reasons. Among them may be: 


- increasing scarcity of moose in readily 
accessible places, owing to increasing disturbance by tourists; 
- adverse weather for activity by moose; 
- inferior moose habitat visited, part of period 
July 17-26. 


No such decline was evident in the result of de 
Vos* 1952 Missinaibi work. The greatest difference between 
Missinaibi Lake and Perrault Falls may be the amount of 
disturbance to which the moose are subjected. 


It is shown in Table V that summer and fall 
helicopter flying produces about 14 times as many moose 
observations per hour as the field party did. In spite of 
high hourly helicopter costs, it is just about as economical 
a way to produce moose observations as is the canoe approach. 


By : . 
vj <=" 


eweee? 


— 
<= 


2 5s | “ = £ orate ; sis6n84 BY 408 aS ; 
wey | agoor : ‘P oti  Seao seo —o +e 


os : 


rignde 5 Goes 


eet 


feito 


ie 


inoed, -q Flea ig! 
2200m eenroit 1 


WIS RCS 
: 4° esa at 
sf). ; aa) rat Be 
ri.G ESL | RUE e 
i bes . REY. ‘) 
: ~ ULL Cui 
to 1S ‘ LO con : e ive 3 Mae ite 
bovyeedQ..-< GROOR Satie 36 268 
coH-s649" bower bie ly «Aq 
— © pen nee ate ate Na ee a 
bye : eieten ae yaad & caer a G 
es onim oS sat Qf MOL 
ev. d SA sate OS sad BS 
¥[dadorq et nofeewesedo te saat mi enti an 
aq Ve ers so i . 3f1Qeeemy 
we ; vA 
wT ; Boon’ he qb sg 3 fuseaonbes 
IUGELE ‘qaile set Wit: OF |riwe eo9B Le 
- vd i'vrIos Tea igpow setevage 
io imeq ,bodbakv sacided secom TOLReamEe a 
; ‘ jnabivs sew eniio 6b oc on 
zotpoye ef? how Petentae 
4 van oifet ¢fosweF bas shad | 
t pie Th. .SBOOM: B13 oo dw Od-8 4 
bus enwwe ‘tede V ofeet ab niente: ‘ek 
Lavy cat g ed | Al eae at OE vaaiborg ‘enevh 
bih vise’ DSi}. edt as: ton Ogee 
jods dank et gk ,eyeon 193g opifiend Ve 
np endbidavrsado 280m SoROanE 


Z10= 


Variations in Rate of Moose Observations with Weather 


It is difficult to relate the effect of weather 
on moose activity on the basis of only 29 observations, 
Since weather in itself is so complex. While no moose were 
seen during rain, they were seen at times while the cloud 
cover ranged from clear to overcast. Precise weather 
conditions at time of observation varied considerably in 
other respects -— temperature 609 - 75°F, all wind directions, 
and wind velocities of up to 35 m.p.h.. This whole 
question is much too complex to analyze on the basis of a 
few observations. 


Moose Food Habits 


Every effort was made to ascertain whether moose 
seen were feeding or not, and the adult moose involved in 
12 of the 20 observations were judged to be feeding on 
aquatic plants at the time of sighting. 


The adult cow with twin calves seen at 9300 AM, 
July 9th, S248 AM July llth and 10:45 AM on July 13th was 
feeding on aquatics on each occasion, although the calves 
Simply remained on shore or in shallow water nearby. This 
cow was feeding on Potamogeton richardsonii, among other 
Plants, on July 13th. 


Two adult cows with one calf each, one observed at 
Ges0 Al on July IAth, the other at 72:45 AM on July 27th, 
were feeding when seen. 


Three single adult cows, at 7215 AM, July 13th, at 
Ze4o PM July 27th, and at 7335 AM July 30th, were seen feed- 
ing on aquatics. The cow seen on July 27th submerged itself 
a couple of times while feeding. 


One yearling cow, seen at 9:10 AM on July 19th 
was feeding when seen. 


The adult bull, which was seen at 10:45 AM on 
July 12th, was feeding when seen, as were 2 of the 3 yearling 
bulls seen. These were at 2300 PM on July 12th and 5300 
AM on July 19th. 


Little exact information on aquatic plant species 
being eaten by moose was collected. Quite a few specimens 
of such plants were preserved, and when these are identified, 
we will be able to elaborate upon the aquatic food habits 
somewhat. 


Moose Behaviour 
Behaviour notes taken during the field party*s work 


are too few and too unrelated to summarize at the present time. 
They will be saved for possible use in the future. 


arteow 


SHEE \ 


ef 


ry cS 


Bebe i 
reir LAO LVeSSH 
; i : P at 
ea si SOO 2 EIB 
tae" wd om 
ts ‘ 
22 3 0O8B Beilin 
; ee Ma og 
"4 < Vasu oD 
> + ' : aw 
j " wipe & z 1a 
+ ¢ fy Tipe sates ris | 
ee a eee eee 
. 5 Se 
: St tie 
ti 
’ A ‘ 
/ - bes 
5 ES 
rs 1 ts 
f “a h. * 
. : r 
? Cit 7 iy f K 
2 
F eh t 
¢ c 
"h de ears 
ii {4 
foi Fie 
1 y j 
ripe) © 
! 4 eta 
ie eT 
Dex: Fy 
it j 
TOs 
: *, 


ree 
SOO 


mete 


Ph 
es 
= 
107 7BV% 


OMe 
N[2BE Ww 
of nk 

ek 


3 ft: 


ality * 


s8 Foot 


w 20e 


fart? SrAt 


A re “ 


oat TOnew Wei Take a AO) ace ie 


_Seiwe eng 


ie. *se2 5 oa, ‘ooatee. suo 

sede OS oy Line ha) ers ‘ 
sxokgmcs oa at! peer 
olinw Gomey 28 186s ew) Went: oe 


a dRRO SEG. 0% RG Lo f 
fenton he tey ‘ng lvewisedo: tO 


aay: 


“alka qin EGE SS 0) CR 
SS IG. oaylens pt: re beeen. Bic: 


‘bepbul ‘erew ‘ano: evi adea 
Wiel ca a En oil atid iat 


aes fa Neem Wood att f pho tos : 


1 boa ~bovarsteny Sy SW ae 


Wats ae: pfavor ood bas weg e 
ors b Kd t | er ore? oy ot, Ssh Bk f ~ : 


+" COR, Or IRV e ditt: 


OC? BbAM BBW rT ‘ 
a Posies 4s TOM TO Bee 


reyes rich ee Oo a 
*Od ‘bee SRS ako a 
if RLV reek ie GER aot, of 


10 is; jomaso Bo a) 


ano, adiw swoo tubal vif 
f SArG. arch. eevee Deeg 
s 1988 Rees’ 


NOEs Lente a54 
MA PRESS 38. brut ety S 


SRL hass LE ive eaptt 
1990 “(wod, BALe LSE. voit 
1938 erty 3 


fase cotw aatbeoteems 
ME GOSS 33 orteeh seo Dia 


es 


acd Berta tren a e%e ef | 
OO. sity Ge OGmE vig 


Ny 4 
TOO SS Saeee og Rai te 


ub 143 x ad jTOM VOR VRE fog = 


Ae m ~*~ tad ' 
ol oe ne 
Dee feed BS 


a 18 
>» 


i 


! 


ahs 


Moose Marking Experiments 


The starting point of marking experiments was 


using the marking device described under Method II by de Vos 


and Pearson (Preliminary Moose Movement Studies, 1952).# 
In addition, each marking device setup was accompanied by a 
48-hour alarm clock fixed in such a way as to indicate when 
the marking device was sprung. 


A C.I.L. fastedrying enamel, Vitakote, was used 
in this year*s experiments. Supply of this enamel was 
irregular, and reduced the intensity of marking experiments 
by about 50%. 


The following is an account of each marking 
station: 


Station #1 - near east arm Wabaskang Lake. 


July 7th = installed unmodified Method II device, with alarm 
clock string tied to marker string. 

July 9th = checkeds sprung by moose, but razor barely nicked 
bag, and clock failed to stop. 


summary = one encounter with moose in which marker and 
clock both failed, in 2 days’ operation. 


Station #2 ~ Ord Creek 


July 8th = installed unmodified Method II device. 

July 9th = clock had stopped owing to dew. 

July llth = paint loss, bag nicked owing to dew. 

July 13th =~ normal. 

July 15th = successful marking had occurred at 7330 AM, 
Judie Sth. 

July 17th - normal: Method II device replaced by rat-trap 
marking device. 


July 19th - marker sprung by dew. 

July 21st - normal. 

July 23rd = AM - marker sprung by dew, removed. 
July 23rd - PM - marker re-set. 

July 25th = normal, device removed. 


Summary =- one encounter with moose in which marker and 
clock both succeeded, and three marker misfires, 
one clock failure due to rain or dew in 18 days’ 
operation. 


Station #3 -~ Ord Creek 


July 9th = installed unmodified Method II device. 


#% See Fish & Wildlife Mgt. Rept. No. 24, Auge 1, 1955. 


) 1S ES GRO} 
3 vd £1 sorle 


r= A . j 


£5 oe 
Garay 


nildcen 26 ‘epee = 
aM \9hhe* bedissaeh 3 =! 
¢ 6071 bed@ SASaSwON gEcoM yiae! 
vd bobreqinoa se Gea quiee eptved 

iD wow BO tege mi 


sara see 5 
heeds ity bes 
ee it) Es 


oie HOTLY Sameta & + eebadee sad 
ye ot aon sane ee 
Ha) Syn te a etn ae 
ieee To fatoose hs antwoltst 3 
.oedhd aotpteancde’ warts Sees Seeereeeee 
4 , \ fap ee re bod se? as Li borne Beis 
a. Pate oy aid ov gs ny i. (aex aa iene 
‘ " oa Mee & it = fe a? ahd Ta ht sO Bp £2 & . 
weds od bwtret aes 
EL een Liat “Tayi 
10 *ayah £ af. ,belree 
; J 44) 
4 DOL / Bie Beto ee 
Pas tI to ye t+" 
i a8 
Ala? ieee eee pene gar | fw Lanenoe — 
ra oss) 1 rin 
- r us eS PNK E ES eb rererr ds u ( Laon 
~vosiveap asta 
eT eae i” & pitas § i “ta & -. (oH Be 
. * tC 
a3 ewoar : ; “Mito & SER e0rs 
eres eds ~ "* BP he i bs fol 
bevomey. eokveb “Lsserrostoas 
oe 
Sy SB OO ILS Ve pemeees ec ce SiG. zg ae 
Fen vrata jou tded eee 
vs By +:  S00is Berg 
 ottetega 
i i / eas ae ae {$.. Pe eae aa : 
y C i | bot’ homed Dis Sea 


pe 


July llth - razor blade touching bag because of dew. 

July 13th = successful marking had occurred at 6330 AM, 
July 13th. 

July 15th - possible encounter with moose at 11330 PM, July 
14th, but razor had slid under bag without 
cutting it 

July 17th = encounter with moose at 6 PM, July 15th, marker 
failed because razor barely nicked bags clock 

: almost faileds paint-holding bar lowered. 

July 19th = clock had stopped and bag cut because of rain. 

July 2lst - marker sprung by dew or rain. 

July 23rd = clock had stopped through string tightening, 
marker normals trap removed in morning, re-set 
in evening. 

July 25th = marker and clock sprung by tightening string. 


Summary - three encounters with moose, one in which 
both marking and clock were successful, and two 
in which marking was unsuccessful but clock 
worked; also four marker misfires and three 
clock stoppages through tightening up of one 
Or both strings with rains all in 17 days’ 
Operation. 


Station #4 - Ord Creek 


July 9th = installed unmodified Method II device. 

July llth - normal, marker accidentally fired while being 
checked. 

July 13th = successful encounter with moose at 93:30 AM, 
uly Syn. 

July 15th = clock had stopped because of raing marker modified 

k to a balanced-rock-loaded device. 

July 17th = normal. 

July 19th = clock had stopped through tightening of string. 

July 21st - marker had been sprung, and clock stopped, 
probably by wind. 

July 23rd = marker had been sprung, probably accidentally. 
Marker removed in morning, and re-set in evening. 

July 25th = marker had been sprung, probably accidentally: 
marker removed. 


Summary - one fully successful encounter with moose; 
three marker misfires and two clock stoppages 
as a result of rain, dew and wind, and one 
accidental release of markers all in 17 days? 
Operation. 


Station #5 - Cedar River 


July 27th - installed rate-trap marking device. 

July 29th - clock stopped prematurely because of rain. 
July 3lst = clock stopped prematurely because of rain. 
Auge 2nd = clock stopped Becraeurely because of rains 
marker removed. 


od soba BEE bad role aie 


TAR Ep Siege sists mite. "13 


2 SSS0S Rene raid ipa fo kaw 


SRUBIE? ¥ suo 
Bi OTTO: go 7 ee 


8. eecom tube hemoiuareinarie: kits 


ak 

Mid. 38 aaoum "athe ‘geanboes 
stn vievtad somee, sausesd 2 
ue seas nha ape ~~ oe Diet. Sagi 
“Fie ei: TRE, $58 i coe peat 190 
mae [So hives wee ease) 


, Prion dyed! ( y begadue a ph 


ak Devote ‘ead. « Lempessty’ 


Pek. 


room tw wincmostA cory ay 
LOW 20 is bot ee aotdved dg 


aye ye nes tugd oni MT 
a na rinaiise az yoda ge. Pey 


+ 


“hs Sake no bw abate haem 


a 
otros bel tt homu 
rr +> i tear 
fale the wi 
* 5% 
i ee 
Dyan 
é 4 bs row ’ 
r > Ft yi we ei 
t in) ic | yigh 
i bil 4%. ] 
‘ 4 
a h4aa 
i fitc 
r { Sf i 


ua, “pcPhs Tis et bal. 
rr i) om we hac a 


WOOTTE Lhi?SO 9458 Vi Jiri 
Wt Hid, bittedk pee “ena 
2 web nies 30, (seen ae 
‘ war fo ey q 2B BG. & t ie ete Hiso8 

; Taw ioge@ 
fpaus SDS. - 
cS Oe a br Ri: SS hae lisS Bai Lab: pink: 
oy 5) rt 5) ney Fm af fish qqo: $a sool a 
cnoed ¥iorwweme Demigods oake 
locintenons, Degg Ore ae OFS 
heryotro nh 4 aobcaat < 


ee 


ee a ae 
® 


134 


Summary - three clock stoppages in 6 days’ operation. 


Station #6 - Cedar River 


Auge 2nd = installed rat-trap marking device. 
Aug. 4th = normal 
Aug. 5th = normal, removed. 


Summary - normal in 3 days operation. 


Summary of Stations 1-6 


Total days operated: 63 days. 

Total intervals between inspections; 31. 

Total ineffective intervals owing to marker misfire: 10. 

Total intervals throughout which successful marking might 
have occurred; 21. 

Total number of encounters with moose: 6. 

Total number of successful markings; 3. 

Reasons for failure if moose encountered; 
- bag nicked delivering insufficient paint; 2. 
=—uravor failed to nick bag at alls 1. 

Total number of bags of paint used: 16. 

used to mark moose: 3. 

failed to mark moose; 2. 

marking device misfired: 9. 

accidentally lost; l. . 

remaining after survey; l. 


Well over half of the paint used was wasted, owing 
to misfires and accidents. The high number of misfires were 
unavoidable, as the devices had to be set up fairly sensi- 
tively in order to work, and there was little leeway after 
thate Should the experiments be continued at all, it would 
be worthwhile to search for a shrink-proof string. Such 
material would probably have eliminated 7 or 8 of the 9 
misfires. 


An adequate supply of enamel would easily have 
permitted the operation of two more stations from July llth 
- 25th, and four more stations July 27th - August 5th. 

This would have added 38 twoeday intervals to the marking 
experiments, or some 120% more effort than was actually 
applied. At least twice as many moose would likely have 
been marked. 


There is considerable room for improvement in 
the marking device itself, so as to increase the proportion 
of successful markings after moose-marker encounters. 
Continuation of the study should be preceded by development 
of a more reliable marking device. 


ep 


- 
i LS 
Ee beast 
y 
7 


sUQ 


aynb: a oe eSQeqgere XooLo ss 


» 
’ 


4 


atvel aati yonteoer be Ls 


ee OF stitwo atéviedah eam 
na Ditpessege dorty a te ele 


chose easy oe 6 cigbL po bane 


. a ayeb ea fama i 


d ‘Seeded Atdn edonanana to” 
ih a 7 


“touts xabed = 


or : 
eit “ 


del agod 
eek re : mt 
Lt | pane eGeqene ‘oamted ele ie 


thotius 


eLivine ite eego ie a 
WeeTosRUOotS Ga ae — rot 
(feos esl seer eee: wih 
ihe ta yak to ka Ort bol bet? ft 
(OL. shame aq to aasd +ou x 
ar ) rs COM WISI we 
oo ae Loom xine OF, 

.© bos? esa So 2a ri 
7 ee weol Thi aE 
a gue oete pol nes 


FiOF a2 te tied teVO> 


Loe! BE bet eon bree ont BEM 
tf sew Steda hie” tow 69" top 
LE ONOD Borer. ong f 
HHP a1? od Se 


7 bs ki 2 : zy iia ti t ¥ ; dagg Lt & bE 


: 2 oe ke 5 supebs a roy 
de stom fo te ere Se 
yo ety mess are avon Rey 
LAVISOGL Veto eS Seas hae —s 
Sl tis : *x , 4 tie ( i Sf: i: Fr woe ia 6.5 7 
nt DOU ay R i Pe est) Evia tenet then 4 


tL. 
' { : 
i ae, 
. os 
- 2 
: 2 ¥ 


ees 


We were satisfied with the staying qualities of 
Vitakote. However, California biologists caution against 
the use of any paint, and recommend a dye instead. Future 
workers should use dyes rather than paints. Good dyes may be 
available in those developed by the California biologists, 
and in modern sheep-branding dyes. 


The final aspect of the marking experiments came 
on August 19-21, 1954, when A. T. Cringan and E. H. Stone did 
some helicopter flying. Every moose seen was carefully 
inspected for signs of enamel, but none was seen. Since 
only three moose had been marked, this was not surprising. 


Further marking experiments should be aimed at the 
marking of 20 or more moose. The senior author feels that 
this is the minimum number likely to afford useful results. 
I would first like to see the whole problem appraised by a 
panel of research biologists, to judge whether or not the 
approach should be continued another year. 


Summary 


We wish to summarize the several suggestions and 
implications which have been made in this report as to the 
conduct of future investigations for similar purposes. 


1. Field trips should be confined largely to the time of day 
proven to be most productive of moose observations. 


2. Every moose possible should be photographed, as an aid 
to establishing repeat observations. 


3. If disturbances reduce the likelihood of observing moose 
in mid-summer, the work should be done earlier. 


4. A non-shrinking string should be used in marking devices. 


5- Dye should be used instead of paint, and a supply ample 
for every emergency be obtained before experiments begin. 


6. A mechanically superior marking device should be developed. 


7e Continuation of these investigations should be subject 
to the approval of a panel of research biologists. 


: 
>» 
a 
E 
rad 


Th 


the 


rei LE bane 
ayo 
ad Vem 


. 
~ ~ —.* 

a 4 
ere i | 
sree ‘ 

5 ' 
-Tpialy 7 
V i ws 

ar 
nt 3 
Pelee © a 
ve. & A> oy 
ropa fe fa 
id eds 
Batak 
é 
} Ox 
5 Pe Of 
4 ' 
rs "¢ re 
f 
® 
1 
ot bd 
a: 
Tae 
_ 


aout 


io fete einvyovtiad ond and 


bomis od Hf Hote adhe NEL TSQES ania ti pou 
gut» TORSUE jbnie eit!  .eenom STO, 0) 
LuTSsey ‘frroxts ele Clete ‘CONSE TILES 


eee ebw 196m SBOOn. agteva 


ropes Ton eew efay 


oqiug velimie att enoljesivesvaiem as a 


Leip 3 satyede ‘Sas inte: by 
ot seas ee ‘toknco Lord atirorel 
neeseme ayb. » Snetinogen bas.» 
bool. ",edirtec pads -rehoet: 2s 


,eagh ynkbnn4 


Laqee qittitsa 9 if ‘po sagas: face 
na bre reais” a ae. oct, ek eb [: 


os &B8w “enon” gad. ene 
 bostas ae 


S ae meld ie eborks Sie eon od= olth 
so “edjedw Sabot of  ,égeteelongme 


2 THY neidons " beaREdROs od te 


oe 


oyque  Laivevseens emi apaue. ‘od ee 
sisger eida mt ebem neod e¥ad pce 


of 3 yfLoatel benttnos od “bivote an 
Ay Tee seacin! LO Svs IDOE TRO ae 


botqsswovaitie ed hive: ue | oLitte ng 
f LC SAE CY es oery artt, 


io “te becetitemtes arid * ube es aed rote 


Ang ore oe fpr” “rep mpm. 
2 ae Ane ney er Fi nig ht ihe 


on ef biteds stitch 


fy & 1 cpa TS De jane boge ad i GL 
yo atyoled henpeddo od. -vo ree tee 


' HE Noah fads : 2h i ali 5 - et 
biveta soiyeb sent torres ae 


aed eles a rf a . 
enoidgntdeovar soond “te nokd 


fold josapeer Te feana & Fe Levondgae 


eis 
AN ANALYSIS OF THE SEX RATIO OF TIMBER WOLVES 


KILLED IN 1948 AND 1949. 


by 
A. deVos 


An analysis was made_of the sex ratio.of timber 
wolves killed in 1948 and 1949, where the bounty was paid 
and the sex of the animal was determined. The overall 
analysis shows a departure from an expected 131 ratio 
which is weighted towards the males. This departure in 
itself is not significant but at specific periods of the 
year, such as the late winter and early spring, deviations 
from this expected ratio become significant. 


Another peculiarity which showed up in the analy- 
Sis was a predominance of females killed in June of both 
years. Although this predominance is not sufficiently 
high to be significant, and the sample is rather small for 
these months, it is nonetheless interesting. Further 
analysis of subsequent years might provide sufficient data 
for statistical proof of these assumptions. This further 
analysis could be made in Mr. Madigan's office, and we 
mee oe that he be asked to undertake this compilation 
work. 


Further information regarding the means of kill- 
ing the animals is also forwarded. This was compiled on 
the basis that the means of death was recorded only for 
those animals whose sex was known. Data regarding the 
demise of animals of unknown sex were disregarced. 
Analysis of the means of taking the animals will also 
provide more useful information. 


<~e Pr SEN ‘iF 
~REIV OW, HG 


y 


OACE, TH BACT a cma ibe 


to lo .oLIBY Xe eee. te ebm sew Ske ted 
ssv' yonuod oa stariy, Caer trees oiOL me 
ST o.3n a DEILERTS 3 Pte Laeett oes ong’ 
bist Lf pew 28GXR, In oth SPrisges Bee 
cucvegeb alt? ..eelem oat epeewod Bem 
i ore { Deb ee ane oO Maain) sipoltiagiea ; 
vol ,~niiege Vittee..oith Tote ere eee 

|" *.ngotiiag ie. anosee oiges basoe. 


=. 


id. lee: A hie Fira +3 heed te Athy Tet ieoeg sen te 
ro a: fir Of: ek tae BIST Te syaactmobe ray 
Laie to titi for gay S pe rmohedq wide an 3 
Bite. TStet.. ek. camee a ha} D4 2) inso lt ng heg 
iad s athteeneven Bb al'sdcé fon. et ee 

} CAB LAe toe ae OL Vora rahe BIRO: droupeedug 
ivu% etd? waeekiqmimesn seats te toes 
hde”, et htin as reeioen . 4M a3 ebaared 2 OS 
slicngo itt Slpes bur 62 bodes ed ons 


‘O- Ene aid arbbrieiios felteaotae ‘redg 
eta y BBM. BP geeerOs: CMe of sat 
ino -bobuadette eave _ idee fb: tc ansem: ene ia 
i. ey gts city Bish é iw itR, eew KS ie: gaotw ~ 
babysae wee 4s fot sae. ot ormiiy to eta 
Ltay G Les ran eet bana ay Bich 3 =O BiRon ce 


: ; r 
smotvgentrotat DTaRae 


ie 
ri 
ry 


°YOTIS UTM PeTITY pue STYS uo peseyO 4 eoueTdite UTM peTITy KE "exe UTM PeTITy ¥ 


peuMod’ as 
fee Um Ae SG Be ER Ge eS 
CS) Cia ie o =i o | 2 + © So oO 6 x on a % 
L2LT - SCATOM FO sEquMN TeIo] 
6 66 te ee ns ee ed ce i ae nae 
Mere ao Gi 6 To oO & OF 2 6 Ce 1 2 C67 "08( 
[mon Ono 96) 66 «1 0 0 0 2 OF  4T OC 0 Occ Ge ace “AON 
0) Oe Cacia aimee oo 0 © Sr Oe er 6 © & O ol 62 Ue 490 
OeezenOr = 9 0c S14 It OF esis ho Oe ee a oe Oa Or “qdog 
O20, © 0° Z i 9 02.0. 8-6 4 eee O: 0802-07 = 5 aE id °dny 
mere. 0 8 Oe Cerner 06 eG o>) 0-0 9 & oi Aqap 
Oeeee-0- 6 = 22 Gt O50 Stee eS eee 0-0-0 = Gi = Oe oun 
core GE te Lt (0G ir 17 6 @ O28 Oe i OP Aen 
Meee) eg 9 6 6G te] et ee ee “dy 
MG a a eo 6 eC) Oe wm Ot 8 6S ae. 0 IEW 
goes Gio. 66 zz OG Or or ot oo oO 1 is or “q8d 
fees 0 Ch “S6s Seema <8 - O- Bh 96. 22 -uer 
Gio =o) 1) Ommeapesor op i) 0) I Sheu fant oye 8 
3 bd 38 oS ag eed er. Sot ‘3 
a a a er: a see eee os 


og 


i} 


7) 


C+ 


CASE OG OS 


OM Sy a= OAs 
OG Wee eho 
Tee 95) 9 SS 
[ue 0c 6 29 
ie 9c, 8° 8s 
O-07 Or x0!) 
SEAS G gee Cuih= Nae (Aas )/ 
9G £5 s- 9°69 
C1Oe —O0Sa. 4, 09 
ON ASS 
Gee 65 “7-09 


he 65 Fe 


LL6 


OE 
L6 
6S 
TE 
OL 
oo 
Al 
€6 
86 
old 
06 


Dp 


Saee, OM], JO TeQoOL 


emey 
€°O% 
yf [tay 
C28€ 
TOE 
UPS 
6 5S 
Lee 
Gace 
bosses 
Se 
AUG 
Se 


O6€ 02S O9€ Lael 


cf  9°s5 4S zen GL echS €0T 
ee es 26H 0°0S 8h 0°0S gt 
6k 9°85 92 CC Ge Oe Ne ENE = ISS 
et 1g “1 Soe ea 
qi CO} ey ys 020556 0205.6 

€ GF 99. 29, er ened. e945 26 
6T Ter St 9°26 0€ 4h Lz 
Gz. 6819 St 6°97 92 1°69 et 
Ne 16 06 $°Sz ET StH BE 
6L  €°9$ z0T To 6 6°€S ott 
oF 6°19 $9 zee 6T 99S Sz 
eaea of 

Son > ea Se Bee te a SO 

GAT S761 


Sptooey Aqunog JTomM Jequty 


-/T- 


STVLOL 


Tequsdeq 
JIaquenoy 
138q0390 
Jequeqdss 
qsnsny 
Aqne 
eune 

Aeyy 
Ttady 
yore 
Arentge J 


Azenue rp 


ee ee ee 
ages Da 
i ee ols 


ghee ae ee 
a ay ie x es Bi ale 2 ~ ytauast 
we 08 ae Gr eta te Site Sores vrautdst 
ae eee Ge eed SE Tax eect ons diet 
e083 BC Ghee ws 2fa 98 “9.80 EL ‘Scat SE terol 
St €2 Tee se ss 8 Ee wait 


8d -3€ Sue tt Vie. £5 G.ck  § 0 ei yedmetqee 
ee C2 . Ve eo <8¢- OS oe Or PY ea 3 1sdod 
Cree ve Est 4 aa or eral ‘ OE 3 A IC ay* : 4 ~ 2 
——- es OcF2.’ Tet Js fi dice S.Si ey— 8.52 -“E£0] tadmgoad 
7 , G 5 
2 


=_ > me | , = OUI 
re 
. 
ry 
» a 
| 
ru 
“4 
“ 
7 
“y 
“y 
at 
= 
e) 
fe 
Q 
et 
ml 
ru 
=. 
a, 
= 
age | 
© 
i | 


ley 


STATUS OF WOLVES IN TWEED DISTRICT, 1954 


Vi 
H. Ge Lumsden 


At the spring trap-line meetings 91 trappers 
were interviewed about the status of wolves on their lines. 
It is felt that with some exceptions much more accurate 
estimates were received than in 1953. 


It is again, however, most difficult to distinguish 
from the reports, timber and brush wolves. Iiany trappers 
claim the presence of only timber wolves when bounty 
figures indicate this species to be extremely rare in that 
countye 


It is also extremely difficult to give any 
estimate of density for various parts of the District. We 
are still unable to indicate on the attached map how 
many square miles per wolf the various colour symbols re- 
present. 


The following table gives the reports of trappers 
on the status of wolves classified under four headings 
for 1953 and 1954. 


Increase Same Decrease Do Not Know 
1953 ei 27 7 20 
1954 13 3h 28 Abe) 


When the locations of the trap-lines showing 
increases or decreases are plotted on a District map the 
pattern becomes much clearer. All trappers across the 
northern part of the District report fewer wolves or none 
at all present on their lines during the past year. 
Reports of the same or an increase come from the west 
central area while in the eastern part there are some 
trappers reporting complete absence of wolves where com- 
parative abundance was reported in 1953. 


The following table gives the number of timber 
and brush wolves: bountied in the counties of Hastings, 
Lennox and Addington, Frontenac, Renfrew, Lanark and 
Prince Edward. Only part of Renfrew and Lanark Counties 
lie in Tweed District 


1950—51 1951-52 1952=53 1953-94 


Timber Wolves 29 nak 26 13 
Brush Wolves Su, 104 149 95 


A?QL , TOLAPEL 


webamsdl 6D oH oa 34 


sid [0 eygniteam eniiaqsad sakige odd A 

“vy co aeviow. loveusede sit Juode bewedvae. 
Ss otcom “dou ‘ered TS OE) Smee. AoW: gant tist @, 
a) > — sebtei: ak ‘apd? povisoer SSW 163 
| SitTib Jteom .ieve wtorl iksga:ekt gt 
vie.  e@evilon: rai id bie xedmig "2 T0ge ae 
vod totw eevtow. Tromatd iS Vino” ‘to -eomeaotg Tuk 
a -elomeyoxe od o Do age aide. od B9.LDAE 


. 
bib yismertdxe nak eb. dds 
i to-edseg acorre aor Yotemsp 304 
i qo bedongda eng re sJaotbal of pigeavs 

“ye snotao.. ue: ABV ONG S i Low 19q esiiae 


28 | Hid EVLA © fides gatwollot othe ' 
9 ebiu hortieasto esviow 20egmes 
eftOL bag 
2Bomoel gel ~~ Speeront 
per BAY fs 
> “AE att 


ic iO BAOL cH9 of said .teaie 
tointe ld pene. Gedgeiq ets 269%99D. Tor 
Ssqqets: LEY. tots fo. “do Lait onooad & 

ra oy 


awed my a = bn ane Oe crepe ee ict to fee 8-2 | tae 
i¢ aaivub eonli ““hedd so tiga 


(4 “Hig aut (O° SEBS! ok A 137d ME end “to i 
(ons TisdeBo hes aoe el. t rlwe 251s" £ 
fed stoLlquos. ga J1O9St Sie 


a Oi: i a oy A 4g ay ‘Saw oO SBbrEdea 4 ¢ d . 


edd eevin aldat gotwollot ai 
to petdewoo sist mt De > ki brLeross aov iow te 
; i en EEE 5 oe ORD SHC t i -* aro 73 ‘fz. rebAD bas 3 


pas we fo 9 fai {n0' Difecii 
“so bag Sew 

Mee eae! fawOe Ot i 

- oe Peepmnen igen heden roetesnnay © - e i: 


Teo meta oe Og covloW ate 
ft. \OL-.. CAL. « eevioW a 


=o 


These figures back up the trappers’ reports that 
there was a decrease in wolves in Tweed District during 
the past year. 


The addresses of the people who bountied timber 
wolves indicated that only seven were actually killed 
within Tweed District. These were killed in the townships 
of Sheffield, Barrie, Grimsthorpe and McClure. 


~ SEND SIS be oe a"tedgs Bid aia. ass dowd. 
. wrebtab- tS a ce 8 taid boowl PVE ge SN Ee & : oe! 6 


nednit pelocted onw pigosd: ems: Fe. eourert tt : 
oLLER el fpudos iow devess eae onde. 

extend - ig ii if. be it ie, | Re Sn a 9e4 4 o = efor 
mur loon: Bae PYTOLGOMINS xq - 


=OOe 


TWEED 
PESTRECT 


eee alll! 
mt : 


0] 
aS < 
I 


INR Fi fire ae GLE Ry 


Plan Showing 
Status of Wolves = Tweed bistrict, 195k. 


Moderate densities 


HHH] Light densities 
io) No’ Wolves 


£ Timber wolves bountied 
Miles 
20 10 @) 20 LO 


beep fe 


-—2 1 


REPORT ON DISCUSSION WITH J.D. ROBERTSON 
MANITOBA PREDATORY CONTROL OFFICER 
THE PAS, MANITOBA, JULY 4, 5, 6; 


19556 


by 
R. Simkoe 


The Fish and Wildlife Supervisor and myself had 
several private discussions with Joe Robertson, Predatory 
Control Officer. 


Mr. Robertson*s impressions and his methods of 
predatory control would indicate that poisoning is a very 
simple and effective method of taking wolves. 


Photos and reports shown to us certainly prove 
that a large number of wolves are taken by this method in 
spite of the cunningness of this animal. 


Most of the control work was done in the north 
where the wolves mainly preyed on caribou and, therefore, 
these animals were shot specifically for bait. 


Sets were made out on the lakes in an area repor- 
ted by the trapper to be most suitable. A fresh caribou 
carcass would be opened up and strychnine spread over the 
entrails and in the liver. The quarters would be removed 
and saved for another location. It was necessary to have 
the poison well distributed in the flesh of the animal 
and the bait anchored to the ice. The anchoring would 
be done mostly by “freezing in." The large bait set would 
be used in locations frequented by a high number of wolves. 


The smaller sets, which included either a hind 
quarter of caribou or several whitefish would be used 
where a smaller number of wolves may be present. The 
quarters of caribou would be slit and poison distributed 
evenly in the slits. The quarter would be frozen in the 
icee Here a hole is made in the ice until the water came 
through and the quarter placed in the hole with one to 
three quarters of it above the water’s edge. Snow and 
slush may be built up around the bait also. The purpose 
of this is that the wolf would only be able to take small 
portions of the bait and he would have to work hard to get 
that. This bait could kill up to twenty-five wolves. Dead 
wolves surrounding a poison bait do not have any effect 
on the newcomers. 


=-22= 


In one case Mr. Robertson came across a fresh 
kill and states he cut open the wolf and spread poison 
throughout the insides and over the entrails and killed 
several wolves that fed on this carcass. 


| Whitefish baits would be frozen in mounds of 

snow and slush with only a portion of fish protruding. 

. This set was used where the other failed. Mr. Robertson 
States that very few animals and only one dog were killed 
accidentally. Baits should be picked up each spring. 


It is necessary that each Conservation Officer 
obtain from his trappers the locations where the wolves 
are operating. The trappers may suggest the best locations 
on a lake where a set would be suitable. When flying 
permits, sets may be made at these likely places and in 
this district (Kenora) deer meat would be the best bait 
as our wolves prey mostly on deer. 


It is necessary to post a sign indicating that 
poison bait is at the location. A spruce tree would be 
placed upright approximately ten paces from the bait and 
on opposite sides. These trees are about five or six feet 
high and are used to attract the curiosity of the wolf. 


Mr. Robertson suggested that in the first year only 
a few baits should be used until such time that we become 
familiar with the project and have some success with same. 
He also suggested that one of our officers return this 
winter and take a field trip on one of their projects. 


' In concluding this report, I wish to make the 
following recommendations; 


(1) that the project be carried out from the District 
office only during the first year. 


(2) that no publicity be made other than advising the 
trappers on whose areas the poison sets are made. 


(3) that this report and our proposed project be kept 
strictly confidential and within our own Department 
and not be released to the press. 


a | PS 
isoert & BEOYOS ons eee . 
sogiog beexrqe brs tihow add ade ae 3 
os tf iat bag. wd tre erty “tev “Site “es 
aes : ante ee eirly i 


ae Ss 


Re 


bron of von e Shyows ettad Agito: 
brio | dat? =o pair & yine Asiw de 
1M Jbofist tedde ads. erect. 
tO" ‘gob 500 ‘Vine boa efentnd wet 4 
, egattqe Wage qu “bedstg ‘od: bimete. Boks 


Bese sy o 
fa 


rT4L0 sda isto ‘Sees iveisaekoon. 
‘Ow ecenw 8 tee r: es ey rf “983 ieee Ot sa te 
f : 3" pete: iT Sat 
* : eae eed bisow I68 8 
Lk VEOUE r i MREIIC 28 Shp eels Yeo: 


ag gee «Me ant : a, bine deen ‘oul . {etonsh) - 9. 
: rte a : o TAG oO eiveom a 


, STOLE: ep1ommooes 


3 way f 
a4 yf { 
~ =f 
ix A ee 
‘ 
ee “4 7" 
ge: 
rt * ," 
‘ SG t 
~ 
c : Tw 
a aay 
‘ 


| 
: 
i, 
al 
~ 


3D 3 


REPORT ON HELICOPTER SURVEY OF CARIBOU 
ON SLATE ISLANDS * 


by 
He. Ge Cumming 


Purposes 


imeoo1o best the eificiency of a helicopter for surveying 
big game. 


2. fo work out survey techniques for use in a helicopter. 


3. To improve on present estimates of the number of 
caribou on the Slate Islands. 


Party 


"Bob" Gillies, Helicopter Pilot; H. G. Cumming, 
Discerict Biologist, Geraldton. 


Account of Trip and Observations 


October 22nd, 1954. Take off was delayed several 
hours due to fog. 


10.15 took off from Pays Plat and flew over 
Wilson and Cooper Islands on the way to Slate Islands. 


We approached Mortimer Island from the west and 
began flying strips over the northeast part of it. 


Most of the leaves were off the trees, so ground 
could be seen most of the time. 


On the last transect, tracks were seen on the 
sandy shore and we went down to hover about fifty feet off 
the water to be certain that they were caribou tracks. 

Over this portion of the island it was impossible to fly 

at any one height due to the rugged nature of the terrain. 

We more or less followed the contours of the land maintain- 
ing a height of about 100-200 feet above the tree=-tops. 

The speed was about 65 mph. Bowes and McColl Islands were 

surveyed with no results. 


x A map showing flight survey lines accompanied this 
report. 


UCT RAG IO rave MTIOOT, 
“Sega shi ¥0 


doing O ot a 


“or “e*qbo TSH Ye ionitolthd 


o he ‘wei e8® Renptinoes wires 120 
vi 


dew oft 20 aacaettes: Jueeetg “GO 
seunolel s7ele Bee 


de 

of DaCL RAED eee zoo ELek caoxtteD » 
ei of ala thse Ted queen 

rk fon 260 a “ep 


Biot 


oysieh eiw Xs) age” Je Ol bass 4 


wal s tid eqn nord | 145 Atoog ate 
D piisle cee ee Ste ao ebosted 10m 


14 sont “Dueted asimt sold bedoeoaqas 
Lo tse desensorer ent seve eqintR, 


coord of Wt ethw devesl oma ae 
,omis odd To geome 


nehy ea arte ysseansxd dest oid 
Hidde evo od moh Tagua bre ae 

.diyao stow yeaa oad" ateoame! Aes 
‘di opoaork Bee OE bys Lek’ afd to Holga 
ds lo side Besta ait of, au gee 
si edt to axpsgned eds Dewollor: eeal 
oid “avods: teat 908-50L tuwods tors 
f baie sew as 2d dtuods new 
ativuest on soi 


nisgimnis Benth yore sig hilt nniiwode eae. 


22) 


11.00 the first caribou was sighted by Mr. Gillies 
on the northeast corner of Patterson Island. A short time 
later the second one was seen. It dashed off through the 
bush with a white flag so prominent that it greatly resembled 
a white-tailed deer. We were about 200 feet at this time, 
and the white collar on its neck was plainly visible. It 
had no antlers. 


After the first two caribou were seen, a height 
of about 400 feet was maintained, as it was felt that this 
gave a better range of vision without reducing accuracy. 
Also, the more level country on Patterson Island allowed 
more control of our height. 


The position of a recent burn shown on the F.R.I. 
maps was confirmed. Some objects were seen on a small lake 
On the southeast corner of Patterson Island. Due to the 
unusually low altitude these appeared much larger than 
they do from regular aircraft. Investigation showed that 
they were black ducks. However, this turning aside from 
our regular flight lines proved to be a mistake, for we 
lost direction and flew very crooked lines on the next 
few crosses of Patterson Island. Three unidentified ducks 
were seen on the southeast corner of Patterson Island, but 
this time we did not stop to identify them. 


At 11.42 Mr. Gillies drew my attention to four 
caribou running over bare rocky knolls near the end of 
Lawrence Bay. We were already past these before they were 
seen, and thus had no more time for observations. 


At 11.45 five caribou were seen by Mr. Gillies 
and myself as they ran up a less precipitous valley between 
the high cliffs of Mortimer Island. Again we were past 
them before they were seen. 


When the remainder of Mortimer Island had been 
covered, we returned to Patterson Island for a closer look 
at some of the lakes where I felt caribou should have been 

' seen. This second search is shown in green on the map. 

. Although we flew around the shores of several lakes just 
above the tree tops in an effort to chase out any caribou, 
our attempt was to no avail. 


At the end of this flight we looked over Edmond 
Island where an empty eagle*s nest was seen (this nest had 
previously been reported by Mr. A. Cringan, personal 
communication 1954). 


if At 12.45 after an interval of one hour we 

_ freturned to the place on Mortimer Island where the caribou 
_ had been seen. Although we searched the valley and the 
shore of the small lake toward which they ran, we saw no 
Signs of them. 


e™ Yo £ 


ate ¢rtte A 


Ag favors tto bedeah 3 ehoee FAW SiG 

ex yidsets dP ene Jaonkaotg on Sslt egiawes 
‘ sido de dee) OOS diode stew ew pee. a 
.clditativ yinteaiq eew seer est ac eB L Eos | a8 bad 


= 
ify 
e] 
< 


‘defad 6 ,deoR Sxew cgdiMed Gwe geget ae $3 “aA 
(F Jan fot enw Sf 85..,¢bentedatem een geese 
sitoybes duoddiw nolelv te sufet '% 
iplel svsteageT Go bia od levels 


Yo’ [UOCSs 
[is Bi 
tsi i MoO 
+f Liema € 

. cr ekl 


asda isaxel dosm Detasage pee obettatls, wee 


edinia ssw, sodiass teak, 
~bratel nee TIT ‘to oe 


ins 


‘Ay ted uo ‘tod ‘ 


cwote mid dnesed £ 25 notice 


t / 
TO ae otewW Saba Oe a * tag 


vonalel noeiedied ‘to 79s GSBmm 


¥ 


howode caolkysyisdesvid .otetorls <3 Lier ae 
bras satan? efad ravawor bvub em ‘— 
sot ,iededa B ed od bevotq eoak Die 
co so BenbL hedeorws.viev well eee 
ub boiitgnehing eet dene T sovisudss Sauer 
| hoes tet iO ‘Tsarvos Sesonsue” TE) aad 
iments tidnebe. od. qote dom bits | 
¢ of tis its. vi were es ifLLeo th Sheth. > he 
ae Ss0n et (fond Wioey oved Teva; ae 
f stad snetd =o Ser weTls ew oW 
2 sriesdo gol mat) stom Of BRE 3 
Mio WSo8  SaawW Od FIRS ay rt Pain ue 
y cuocttetseng esol 6 qu Xen ae 
7 wisgh ’ sbsalel leaddton) To 
1908 SoaW Venn 
fi DOR [Teese oe sobo tency att Soma 
9 <ot bagsler poet eI F84 O41 Partie 
} bt On iy Ott, bane > LB. L Ss tanw O46 dist 6k oO 
3 nosty OL awore eb somes ag 
Yel Lexraved Tt meas sit bavote we Ww. 
') poesia of Gtotts os mE a Sé 
LEAVES, Off OF enw 
1 J * : 
botool ow dig kft ebtt to Bae ed? 3A ial 
iJ} 2908 .3aW Feen oe igag eaciias CS oem 
1% MBean oh an 7 De cvog 54 te a8 3 i 
A@OL TOL B's 
f Maio Te I i Tt yo tn TE “2 ts j alee the 7 ete 
" j oxvorw DSoatlel santo ie one Le gilt odd ; 


[isv oAd bedonesee ow iguodas 1998 am 
ay do dotdw- Pe swad ous, i £ieme ede 


a 


At 13.10 we landed on a small sand beach beside 
towering rocky cliffs to refuel. We then flew over the 
Leadman Islands and Dupuis Island. A young bald eagle was 
seen on Dupuis Island, also many small birds were seen 
here as on other islands. These flew over the tree tops 
in flocks and appeared to be of the bunting-longspur type. 


After a circle over the Delaute Island we returned 
to the north shore of Lake Superior and due to fog once 
more moving in, flew far inland on the return to Pays Plat. 


14.00 landed on the dock at Pays Plat. 


Summary and Conclusions 


1. Ina flight totalling three and one half hours, of which 
two hours and thirty-five minutes were spent in actual 
survey, a total of eleven caribou was seen. 


2e Also seen were four black ducks, three unidentified 
ducks, one eagle*s nest, one young bald eagle and many 
small birds, probably of the family Fringillidas. 


3. The best survey height seemed to be about 400 feet, as 
it gave greater coverage than lower heights and did not 
reduce visibility. However, it was impossible to maine 
tain any constant height over some parts of the islands 
due to the irregular nature of the country. The speed 
throughout the survey was around 60 mph. 


4. It was not possible to draw flight lines before the 
flight. However, it was quite easy to fly straight 
lines, even over the most broken part. It was found 
that turning aside from the line of flight to investi- 
gate objects did not pay, because it destroyed our 
sense of direction. 


d¢ Ten of the eleven caribou were seen first by the 
helicopter pilot. These ten were all on the left 
Side of the line of flight. Several factors may have 
contributed to this situation: 


Lie Inability to concentrate on observing due to the 
continued shifting of the helicopter which gives 
an entirely different feeling from that in con- 
ventional aircraft. 


; ii. Part of time and attention were taken up with 
mapping the flight lines. 


Hite A tour inch to the mille base map of the island 
was usede This provided a sheet of paper about 
two feet square, folded in four. Although this 


sae vk insod base, [Liswe Bite 


aay ~akjeynolagntvand otk 5, ad: Od bovwsegge bo 


sit weve welt cedy oH j 3 
fans bind gayoy A- \pmeie rt A steL 
ese evtsw ebrtd Liem boars o& wbaske re m 

egos send ott eve Webtee baste ero 2 


~ ow bnefel sfuste@uede seve eboeioume Saf 
sono Bot od exb bee wekweque ated to he dP 
ei49 evs of mabset eae ae pBreiar <a walk: 


tel eyet 98 too ede so babel ei 00+ 
>» , servo tac ene bas aptriy snitfevods 


vtos at taede eter eumirem evi lwestingy . 
rock ew Hodis movels To faved B 


bstirtsuebiau cetit paneeh soele sg02 s16w 
aa fos elase bind paiey ose . geen &'e tae 
ashilliangss yitmet edo to yildsdom Sb! 


 tset OCs ovode et ea bemeas trates vovme 

ms acia ty ae oii UGS 1SVOS 1008 

53 sldizeoqmse sav TE = EV ‘SWOT ttlidiee 

2 mo Fo Boa sy Hee” Toro tpfnren Inedaeces > 

e ort we tas sid te. owes th lire tts Sia 
‘cm 28 bowete sow Yevade edd gaa 


+ sioted sbikl stakl) wank of oiOSeGou am 

rte vit od vase aticp caw 72 <te vere of 
Y Bowe vt 12 nepotd geom arta tava oSve 
rit od ddietf? to gafl odd mot] shies Sa 


VSVO TIS } Be | LN Gy haere « (Ree FOR bib ads toe f 
. LOL soaeEe ce 


¢ teri} Sepa, SiSw god rises Ae vols alge 
act no J fe ne aity sey Tats th tol ig "3 qo) 
SYOUIR f feto' fc tay eatin re to on ald afd, O 
. “mrdrutie sidd of Degma 
: in 
+ Ho o88atiesnoo of VOLE 
sogiooklod ede lo aaksiine- Semmes 
i won opktes) grew Lib vie heme 
mae ftstotie [sol dna 


sidAe sae. Di B amt). To ah 
aaniL tdart? and aakqaeet 
rec id. oltw ste od (dsge Seam 


faade hpobtvowg efit, S98 Bam 
x fot  .etaupe teak owe 


HOSE 


gave plenty of room to draw in flight lines and 
write comments, there were disadvantages. Care 
had to be exercised not to cover the instrument 
panel with the map, as the helicopter pilot had 
to observe this at all times, especially at low 
speeds and low altitudes. Also when the survey 
was about half finished, it was realized that the 
reflection of the white paper on the plexiglass 
dome seriously reduced visibility. Dark clothing 
and small maps should be the rule for this kind 
of operation. 


Although most of the leaves were off the trees, there 
were many areas where caribou could not have been seen 
if they stood still. This was especially true of areas 
under conifers. The facts that all ten of the caribou 
seen first by Mr. Gillies were even with, or behind 
the helicopter when seen, and that all those seen were 
running, indicates that they were only observed after 
being frightened by the noise. Also, when we returned 
an hour later to look for one of the groups, a most 
careful search did not reveal it. It is very unlikely 
that we found all of the caribou. 


In spite of the inefficiency of the method, we did see 
more caribou than has any other survey party this year. 
If we had had the benefit of snow on the ground, we 
would probably have come very close to a total count. 

A helicopter for winter use would be a great boon in 
big game censusing. 


snk JARS 
scunse » ps sy¥bset5 Sa cP i 6 2s ng te, ads r aA 
sJenk efd weved GF 9eRn Beat EXO 3 bea 
hol ig T¢ 7005 ELad* ead SFr ry a pe , Sq. 
E vilntoeges , Sons iis an: eins ¢ Ae 
“oda codw o8 IA, .eebadtole wot basil bes ea 
setlasy epw to, baretart -2iss coda. P 
txol¢ ‘st = yeqaq etiiw aac io nordos ton 
“sG e¥ditlidtely booshet.ylacoiiee- emee 
[2 6 ste add ad Bivode eqem £ 2B 
92S PI89 89 oO 
bees ons tke etow coveel off to 35am 
i i jos bluos vodinss. etehw aaeme 
t vil foeqga eee etait Li tte booeaael 
2 ' to nad fie tedd atosioedt eal naa? 
ided 10 ,ivkew neve exew sak tho som Ay! of 
asoe onond Ele akaid bas 4 hess, tere Sees Le 
a bevroade =ine stew Yar cig: THs nodaat 
: ow Horw- y@elk” ” «eetenr ois wd repre 
m8 ,eqoots ert io ae (ot Ages Gre 3 
Cris iy Sf9L. Gas isoven Jom Sib WamueEE 
od kraS act co Sign Bayete 
th ow ,bedtten ede To voce sin EY tend aity® oe 
efi eu babies taAso USB eer cane on t 
bavown, std ee pg to cfianed 6d Bs Bao 
9 Intos & Of SBolD Veey omos aven qidade O74, 
(Oog E 4 6 a nie Seat faiw 462 9H qooky 


_— 7” = oe 
Ve - 7 Ree os 


its werd oy "f bi 4 ont Lt 


-anlevensd 


oy 


COMPUTATION OF CURRENT POTENTIAL RATES OF 
REPRODUCTION OF WHITE-TAILED DEER FROM 
CHECKING STATION DATA 


by 
A. T. Cringan 


Bach fall, a sample of the Western Region's 
deer herd, the sample consisting of some of the deer 
killed by licenced hunters, is examined, and the sex and 
age qualities of that sample are determined. The results 
of this work have been applied in various ways. I wish 
to suggest what is to me a new way in which the results 
can be used, for calculation of the potential preceding 
and following rates of reproduction of deer. 


Four assumptions are basic to the following 
calculations: 


(a) That sampling either provides an accurate 
expression of the sex ratio of the deer herd and 
of its age ratios in the three lowest year- 
classes, or if there is any bias in these 
connections that it is fairly uniform from year 
to year. 


(bo) That reproduction by yearling does in the 
Western Region is insignificant. 


(c) That 2-year old does should produce an average 
of 1 fawn each under normal conditions. 


(d) That 3-year old and older does should produce 
an average of 2 fawns each under normal condi- 
GLOMS. 


1. Calculation of Potential Rate of Reproduction for 


Following Year. 


The potential rate of reproduction for the 
following year, expressed as an index, may be computed 
by adding the proportion of yearling does in the sample 
to twice the proportion of 25-year old and older does. 
The formula for this equation may be expressed; 


Rj = Pir + 2(PTIF + Por) (1) 


wheres Ry © potential rate of reproduction for following 
year. 


a eo ee 
Sb 


CRTAA JASTNETOT yaa Lon 
‘ONT, aad. CHT AT <ATLI 20 noryat 
Ava wORTAYe DMaNDEHD 


ya2! 
ABET. wT oh 


‘no Pao: trEess ow arid a ‘efainge PS 
1a! pete! <p ORCS TS, ay iterients Bh 
roe oft hing petra at | exe Sue: 
tfsaer ecy 5 DB Nea). Me tol ats B ou girl 1BE "sad rb 
‘tw remy sity) 241503 5 eey! om Ga va Pte - O20 qvaed 3 
fuecr edd dottw OP YEW Wee Se ae sae 
-téaatod etd Io nektehioo ies ben a si 
eT 9B, Te aod gowbotd sto Seve 


‘i Of ofeed ete enokvGmiees am 


eta! B ne eebivowg wedirs cathe tadt 
ysab eft te offset seg en?’ io Bereeaaaaes 
ty oi i 20L38% BSR 

cig 


vi et sane 


fe | Bach att lysey vd blame whore = saa 


j sheese Fy rt r wis" z mf rE Dy “i + 3 Ai 5S segW 


nishotp biwode teab bie ane todTt 
toads. Leurteu: Aebas Mose Tee 


pee A le 


‘ iolitouborost ‘to ede’ fettasteg sim 
.TBey 


ae 


Pip = proportion of 1g-year old does in sample. 


P[[F= proportion of 23-year old does in sample. 


Por = proportion of older does in sample. 


2. Calculation of Potential Rate of Reproduction for 


Preceding Year. 


Formula (1) dealt with a sample which included 
fawns. As the fawns had not yet entered the deer popula- 
tion contributing to the preceding year’s reproduction, 
the sample and proportions required for this calculation 
are different than those used in Formula (1). 


The potential rate of reproduction for the 
preceding year may be computed by adding the proportion 
of 25-year old does (as a proportion of adult deer in 
the sample) to twice the proportion of 34-year old and 
Older does. The formula for this equation is; 


Ro = ped, + 2pad 


(2) 


wheres Ro = potential rate of reproduction for pre- 
ceding year. 


00s proportion of 24-year old does in sample 


PIIF 


of adult deer. 


yearlings). 


ad 


p 
oF adult deer. 


3. ~=6xamples 


Total deer 

Fawns 

14-year old does 
2Ze-year old does 
Older does 


Adult deer 

24-year old does 
Older does 

Fawns as % adult deer 


Number 


ug5S 
Proportion 


1.000 
0.214 
@.102 
O.1lke2 
0.150 


1.000 
0.180 
Oru g2 
27 LG 


(Adult deer include 


proportion of older does in sample of 


1954 
Number Proportion 


160 MOO 
7h OG a 
L6 GAO 
59 OL 50 
83 0.180 

350 1.000 
69 0.197 
83 R27, 

Peay, 


} 


fy 


‘ Seyret 


.siqmes af ‘Bend bio “aaeyedl to. ‘hot HOG é 


pkey: 


sfqmee ne “geah BES *naya$s %o “wo Livogornt Shirt 
solgmsa mi eeoh 4abIo ‘to noLrreqgotg = sd 


pa = 


10% sok sonbongod io’ sett ‘Entgaoset Sa: Abed 


ia . £86 “ere ¥ i, 


ee 8 


ne 


tuboufoat dol i Gane rey dsiw. seb. is terse 
a Lirqog Tdeh eds betas ea a bed acwe't add. 
Fetish aatbsooxg edd of saksoe 
Y son. Sear de ape phys bie 
i} eivexe? al een seeds gaa 


be 
a; 


sls 10) coliaupowged Li eds ipiiasdog ofl 
r qo"! fig aii cbbs 7 nat | Bo tq 10D ad YEG BF. oo: 
ni veeb ¢luke to agdtvoqenq 6.68) Be08 blo 
One blo teep~-ke 26 Horiviyoug. sls sola ‘Ody 
cek coLdpape gid? 20% atumo’ SAT che 


~95G wrt F at ai see" Te” ¢ +R r [re Eo! ae =. 
e1Hay antbss | 


fqmse of segh Lio\ amewens to totsrogoaa | = a 
jf * ie I THA io ef tibAd Pat i F. Sh $iprt ars *O. : 
- (eget Case | 


to efagmee m4 sob sable to oLvomeae = 
isoh tigbs 


( eg nore) eee alan o/ele . Cael tor ae Mea er eas 


‘ 
a . - ee ee, arene ines ee 


< 


ri ’ 5 . . “ ? a 
af woe ys Re -' s 5 ~ on £Y og awe | tas 
‘ { rt ark “a mye ape ¢ 
1 : iG 4 "OO es Per Ce, 
hada Bah at wah pa ow a). bE EA ay BAD 


900.1 as 

is = Lie Oo eid d 
es a asob ‘bf 
ifoo | RA aSo0 6 
=) : 


e 
i 


i 
a. 


ORE VO 1 BY pgob bien 
M Le : F ives aa e608 hb * 
Rr Led soob tilusSs ® an 8. 


2o= 


Formula (1 


| 922 19) 
. Number Proportion Number Proportion 
| p 0.102 0.100 
| - 2Prtr 0.284 0.300 
2Pop 0,300 0.360 
| Ry 0.686 0.760 
Formula (2) 
d 
P 0.180 O97 
iF pad 0.384 Ohba 
Ro 0.564 . OnO7 


4. Contrast of Advance and Back Calculations of Rates of 


Reproduction. 


The potential rate of reproduction for 1954 has 
been computed twice in the foregoing examples. An advance 
computation, based on 1953 data, showed a potential rate 
of 0.686, while the back calculation based on 1954 data 
showed a potential of 0.671. These two indices agree to 
within 3% of each other. This close agreement suggests 
that the technique might prove to be quite reliable. 


5« Contrast of Potential Rates of Reproduction and Actual 
Proportions of Fawns. 


The potential rate of reproduction is of course 
theoretical. In ways it is perhaps analogous to the 
normal forest, and gives us an ideal to aim for. Downward 
deviations from this potential are to be expected, as a 
result of weather, snow accumulations, supply of browse, 
density of deer, and so on. Also, post-natal mortality 
of fawns, a normal event, also reduces the effective 
population gain. The factors causing these downward 
‘deviations themselves vary from year to year, and so 
considerable variation in the amount of deviation is to 
be expected. Perhaps a comparison of the potential rate 
of reproduction and the observed proportion of fawns will 
afford us some idea of how good a year it has been for 
deer. In this way, we may better be able to evaluate the 
findings of the snow cover surveys. 


ey le 


we ’ 
ee 
eee =o iisee 1: ‘ cf pete fs 
{ 
consvbk to Oe 
on 
ae ibonget Yo agai ts Linear sit! 
2a] ; senor ent nt solwe Bea _ 
i, 8 bewore  ~STeD 20k no Beead ‘ 
“k beeoo agitet#oLas HOE q ans; ite 
pak caw sted? .LO.0 To Tae aee 
tromeetare peels Ria? <aedde Sie 
Pee Nie oF 4 io. of aveta Ise Sup tide 
7 
ra to HAstan pox gs io 
iN ii a aa Se 


qatteg af ¢h ays am 
, : ; 6 | eX re bas {*¥ 2630 


Pos Whe ie TE oe” t 


av 


: \ -< 
i MNOiJBESa 
> 6 Basdie4 


ot. aS i 
. be oo evi em of ett Bievd Pe pe ft x 
TOI" DEeVIeece Sic WN ROL talc 20 ff 


.¢ a boos wor to gébt. smamaae 


age 


The potential rate of reproduction for 1953 
was (back-) computed as 0.564, using data collected in 
the fall of 1953. Yet that fall, fawns amounted to only 
Piel or the adult deer. This was only 48% of what their 
incidence would have been had the full potential been 
realized. 


The potential rate of reproduction for 1954 was 
(advance-) calculated as 0.686 using 1953 data, and (back-) 
calculated as 0.671 using the data collected in 195k. 

Yet in the fall of 1954, there were only about 0.212 as 
many fawns shot as there were adult deer. This was only 
31% or 32% of the potential incidence of fawns, depending 
which potential is used. 


The above would suggest that the winter of 
1953-54 was much less favourable to the ensuing reproduc- 
tion of deer than was the winter of 1952-53, even though 
there was a greater proportion of breeding does in 1954 
than in 1953. This can be regarded as logical in the 
light of the results of the 1952-53 and 1953-54 snow 
cover surveys. 1953-54 was a tougher winter than 1952-53 
in most parts of the Western Region. 


6. Predictions Based on Potential Rates of Reproduction 


iimeho>s. ule, povential rate of reproduction for 
white-tailed deer in the Western Region in 1954 could have 
been computed as 0.686. In 1954, following a reasonably 
tough winter, there were only 0.212 fawns for every older 
deer in the sample studied, or about 32% of this potential. 


The potential rate of reproduction for 1955 
should be about 0.760, based upon the sex=age attributes 
of the sample of deer checked in the fall of 1954. As 
the winter of 1954-55 was probably less severe in its 
effects on deer than that of 1953-54, a greater proportion 
(say 40%) of the potential reproduction was likely to be 
achieved. Therefore, in 1955, fawns are likely to amount 
ieomaboun 31% of the adult deer taken, or about 0.24 of 
ait deer taken. If so, it will be about as high an 
incidence of fawns as in the good years of 1951 and 1952, 
ae ica higher than the fawn incidences of 1953 
an dhe 


Ze Comment 


The procedure outlined herein for the advance- 
and back=- calculation of rates of reproduction of deer 
takes into account changes in the reproductive abilities 
of different age classes of female deer, and changes in the 
Ssex=age structure of the deer population. It does not 


ot sobtouhoigss 36 eves Ink oRegouhe 
fion suBh patent .Aee,0 aa teva 
NVOMG SIRT LIST eas tet oe 

i TC ete VES RAW eLlAt «T95D ‘of & ad 

atigs toy [Eten bad aeed avet Since Shey os 


a 


t soivomhowger te estar fetone 04 edt 
.stsb @eVl aatey O90.0 6B he te iso Les {ao 

. OSvuosd 1o2 BOISE oe atau (Ga.0 28 rz 
suods vise sxsw esedd , Atel 30 See 
riT ,*eeh tinhs otew.oreitt 6a Jones 
west to esaebtont fetinscod- aren 

| bk Leia 


‘i mt reels Beware. bivow evodn. ott 
f Li ; ois ie L if OG YER eet noem ; 
3 reaSPOCL to ~tsciitw ett asW> eee 


ithesid to solmioqote 7et aetna 
‘ 4 ‘ 
hi £ ee B: S id eo 
‘ f, oe : 
Stren ks ft to 
ye . ah 
£92) 33 BW «ate 
. : peta? 
aihhO Lat! } vi ) 
ty J fre ie 
= a a we oO Ran ery api ga 
> 
= , el a 
we ES cokes of a a 
3 P { 
: } ¢ x 
i r « 
+L ) 
‘ t i b t{> ry 
Ԥ BLGh 
+) apres aol y 
4 ’ 
} 


é UE 3 ea ; oe a ioteyent. 
wiews sah aiubs: sit 26 ‘RiGe 
ds od [ftw of .ce V0) sae 

wo of es ¢ wish: Bt: ae 


et mye 3 ve eee rt a, {Hp i ii 


Josie 
cH raved 3 fuvo ombeso1 Sar at 
qos Lo. peJgeyY To moka LOLS “ADE oe 

t= at seaceats nvcvos oun 
Lee OcebLo et a: 
rea re I tag! moj “ty ahd 


7 


¥ 


os 
sel 


account further effects upon reproduction 
climate, range, etc. Further knowledge of 
ors is required for the accurate prediction of 
0pu tiomcnances through reproduction.’ Still, 1 
“ the above idea may have considerable value. 
I would appreciate the comments of other deer 
the province on the idea. 


r 


SLONYS Hoque eer te eed 


bworal Loo TtNe eve SRist “te 
YQ ST670208, ana et: ction ooh, 
oot prety is dguowds mo 0 
» ae 


eine iy Ts, av Bit 


to etanmied ety aopisanncé: bisow | 
isabt oad do OOnkVOIg § 


-32- 
WATERFOWL NOTES FROM LAKE OF THE WOODS 


by 
He Ee Deedo and H. G. Lumsden 


On the 29th June a boat trip was made through 
the northern part of Lake of the Woods for the purpose of 
examining the waterfowl habitat and checking waterfowl 
species present and breeding. The routes followed were 
not designed to give maximum counts of ducks. Starting 
at Kenora the route led through French Narrows to some 
bays a mile southeast of Shore Island. On the return, 
for the most part, a different route was followed. A 
total of 44 miles of open water and shore line were checked 
Without duplication, altogether a greater distance than 
this was covered. 


There are few extensive marshes in this part 
of the Lake of the Woods but many small bays and narrow 
inlets are shallow enough to support marsh vegetation. 
The dominant plants in these marshes are bullrushes, wild 
rice, sedge and phragmites while small stands of smartweeds 
occurred in some areas. Yellow waterlillies and at least 
three species of pond weed were the most common submerged 
aquatics noted. One marsh dominated by cattail was seen. 
This was a floating bog with a heavy understory of ferns 
and other marsh plants and with a light stand of willow 
growing through it. This is the type of bog frequently 
found on very acid soils on drowned land in eastern 
Ontario. 


The following ducks were seen3 


NG@ie. Of NGis. Ox: 


Opecies Broods Young Average Brood Size 
Golden-eye 16% 86 peal 
American Merganser 6x Lg 8.0 
Mallard 3 20 Oe? 


One mallard nest containing 8 eggs was found. 


x A single golden-eye female was followed by 19 young of 
two age classes. One merganser female was followed by 

22 young. These flocks have been considered as two broods 
in eache 


Other Ducks Observed: 


Species Number Seen 
Golden-eye L6 
American Merganser 20 
Mallard Z 
Baldpate 2 pairs 
Ring-necked Duck 1 pair 
Unidentified 3 


‘d 7 
aebemud ao - ia abaed a it ee — 


fal sia ie Ns 
os) A 
jenn bad pew gtd geod s enut 4008 eta a0 . 
Bod" tig ol sbooW iad&® ‘ho-edtal te oad 
forest ioihhe py Kise ip Bae datidad Iwotvatew, 2 
w bowollet eaivom eit) sanibeord bas: Sees 
taxgod Macau o BIDMOO: tum bcadt ovig. oo keen 
SB ar mre donets dguoreta: bof sdvgt- Bey be ie 
ods ©: ,bialeal siege’ te: In sehIEOR 2 

howollot pee atuon tg TOTHER BS hath: 

w sors cde boa restew noqe to pet 
iegaib hag “eB redtagec eeereys: 
: betsy 


+ ok godaedan sv fansiins wet ous gia 
ox his eyed re 2% Vien vod ebooW ang ‘tO4 
rn tondy Hep oats ot -Apxode wad 
staviliod sya, senersn obeits af esnaiowg 
ima io “bite te fieoe < tk iw Qac: tore ing bn8 84 
. brs esfititaesew wolteY  Jeeeas) sao 
ie nom Jacm edd etek Deew Big 
‘ {iss Pe. Ye OS learn Winger: fi bate 
miotetobay yveet sidtw god paeeeie 
Den Wistl #-CoLH ban g a Nore a 
ct nod o- sav efit Si hype a y 
ae nt Brat bomoth a 6feee Bean 


Ai 


pe 


6% Stew stews satwo lied ame 


' > " « 
i a’ vi 
2 i” 
J " me pa 
7 EDCOT sac 
o~ a Seon ho mmc oy Lanne Soe rig te 
¢ * [ 


iA *  -TSersa tem 


nag S niintsdhoa Jaen 
= re 

if Ss e or (41 on uit 3X0) .2ceeat 
sd aved sis0lT eae 
aiil erty 
oa Foy ye" 


aYowas 


TS20S3 16H 


dou beioese 
beithias 


E335 


This check indicated a game duck brood (excluding 
mergansers) density of one brood for every 2.3 miles 
covered. Had the routes followed shorelines exclusively 
the count would have been higher than this. As the check 
was done during the heat of the day some broods were 
probably missed in the cover of the marshes. 


This part of the Lake of the Woods appears to 
be very good golden-eye habitat. 


On 28th June the writers made a flight with 
Mr. Burton and Mr. Simkoe over Monument Bay, Northwest 
Angle Inlet and Deepwater Bay. The following species were 
seen: 


Golden-eye 3 

Mergansers 4 

Mallard in paar vandupy 
Baldpate 3 males 

Ring-necked Duck 2 pairs and 8 males 
Blue-winged Teal 1 pair and 3 males 


Most of the ringnecks and baldpates were seen 
in the Northwest Angle Inlet which appears to be the most 
fertile marsh of those so far examined in this area. 


elkS) 


* oe 
a BTL 


(i be 


¥ 


ow ie) = 


xd ab ae &) Savennhien 
os VtEVe, FO 

sont lorode bowof fot easuo%) 4 

ahs sabnt ‘aang some need SVs 
aboord emda ab ad? To trod odd goto 


So 
ais 5 VAY 


boord, ono, to: we 


Pode TAT sacks Yo. wevos: ony: ce Paes 8 oy” 


in ef ae 


Siailt B 


Je Swe?’ 


col e YB 
qe: nattwol 


Ait ip adechae fare aoeeaa end. Te 
SAGA no Low 


dd to sted aa + 
»WeNrSe iain 


shen excdiew odd ons! a8 f 
fhemusgioM wav scnmes. aa 
Log: § epet “AH, ee bas 3 


a 


‘Aoud B 


ol elpak desis 
beninexe se) 96 sande aie 


= fans 


eyiee 


WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLANS IN COUNTY FORESTS 


by 
Je Fo. Gage 


This past winter we commenced to make an inventory 
of County Forests in the-.Huron District. We are attempting 
to classify the various tracts as they differ widely in 
what they have to offer for hunting purposes. 


To date we have discovered that there are three 
main categories and a fourth which is a combination of the 
marsh three. 


(1) Newly planted areas of land - trees up to eighteen 
inches high, abundance of grass and sod. Provides food 
and cover for European Hare and Fox - some summer range 
“HOrPcoLcontail rabbit. 


(2) Plantations over eighteen inches to ten feet - maximum 
for cottontail rabbits and fox = some grouse and deer. 
Fair under storey of grass and other vegetation. 


(3) Plantation maturing over eight feet: under storey clean 
- no cover or food = winter cover for deer only. 


(4) Very large tracts are planted a few acres each year, 
this results in sections being in various stages of the 
above classification. They are the most desirable from 
a management point of view. 


We have actually done very little in the way of 
Management. Mr. W. Aw G. Thurston, now District Forester at 
Lindsay, planted some cedar as a direct request to establish 
more food on the Sudden Tract and our Zone Foresters have left 
Openings, old trees and other desirable features at our 
request, providing it did not interfere with their forestry 
programme. 


We feel that this is a long term programme and our 
time is limited. We find that during the winter we are 
able to spend some time in classifying the county forests 
and making game inventories. We have only just started on 
this programme and have a large number of tracts yet to be 
inspected. 


needdaia of Gy ese1d « bast to eesae Bee 
esbivetd hos Bas pests to Somshrmign ame 


TSmie 


_ 
j i} 
ie | 
ae ! 
isoea.2 
72 ‘ 


ad 
. ore oe 
Dijie 
r~ + 
Ase 37 
= 7 
€ 


SB oW .~tottdeld nowt. sal ak eve 
obiw 16 Tip yods Ee SIIE%T - BUALIEY 


eis ertott jada bexsveoeeb avail aw oasb 
to motdsnidues a Bt daidw A oxeoy © bas 38 


tso% mod ot sedont ceadigie Tae gas 
s2u0'TS emoe = x67 bee eeiddat, Lieve . 
Ljadaneav edsq bis: ge tk 26 Yetogee oe 


26° 88198 wel & bednsia site eioeae 2am 


> taovidet Paeskh s ea ws 
: . Ppt ites 


gtegnol eno tuo boa toatT mebhue Siam 


ston iwietetyredat ton bth DE sees 


Y etdstd to tsdmia aia 6 svsd bas ium 


iow YOMUGD WI BRAS roan 


cole »  . | : > 7 
axed 0 “4 aa 


ie 


sie od beonesines ew enstotn: jek c: 


29s0Tteg -gatooud sob Tete ont 


208 = MOY Bns: stash aspeqorge 197, 
y BS det [te ea¥e 


Y | disie teve Sa isugeh ewe 
ised “ot tevoo v8ltin = heed aoe 


2 auotyay mb nobad enobsoge: Mba 
io doom: sad ote ved snokdees Tieceiam 
3 Ws { a7 TH HDG STi KS 


" a 
— 
ic ot ofdckL yesy onob vilewdos evan 
iofrteil wea acovetudT 0 <A) 

bos soee Dbewaie 


‘jae? efiderteeb sedto hae epena 


siq asd saef s ab eid? dade Dees oi 
intw edd Bara Jena brit od bed fmt : 
r3 it univitaaalo sk emi? snoeem 


taut vino sved SW eliounevat Smee ast 


Law 


Officer Reporting 
Ramsbottom, R. L. 


Ferguson, Ke W. 


Shields, S. A. 


Winters, C. H. 


Saundercook, B. M. 


Thibadeau, J. J. 


Shannon, J. A. 


-35- 


by 
P, A. Thompson 


Neo Ln tach 


Date Seen Brood 
May 20 8 young 
July 6 6 young 

Average young per brood 
May 14 5 young 
May 18 3 young 
June 13 6 young 
June 16 2 young 
July 19 5 young 
July 19 7 young 

Average young per brood 
June 9 8 young 
June 1h 6 young 
June 14 5 young 
June 14 9 young 
June 24 7 young 

Average young per brood 
June 3 5 young 
June 4 3 young 


Average young per brood 


No report 

June 5 5 young 
June 23 7 young 
June 29 9 young 
July 8 7 young 
July 22 young 
JuiLy 27 4 young 


Average young per brood 


May 2h 12 eggs 

June 15 3 young 
June 21 6 young 
June 22 4 young 
June 29 6 young 
lava a 5 young 
Judy. 7 4 young 
July 17 7 young 
July 21 8 young 


Average young per brood 


TWEED DISTRICT RUFFED GROUSE BROOD COUNTS, 1955. 


Location 
(Township) 


Carlow 
Raglan 
Vi 


Denbigh 

Raglan 

Matawatchan 
Abinger 
(Gagaiibadal Ala) 
Gaeaefetert hi 
Le6 


Brougham 
Admaston 
Admaston 
Admaston ~° 
Admaston 


D 


Hillier 
Ameliasburg 


Palmerston 

Miller 
Clarendon 
Clarendon 

South Canonto 
pouch Canonto 
Ges 


Tudor 
Lake 
Lake 
Madoc 
Tudor 
Lake 
Cashel 
Tudor 
Wollaston 
Des 


ssaor 
\~ ry 
& 


’ 
Al 
he 
Al? 
t 
274 
} 
‘ 


© 
- 
y\/ 


eo 
. 
— 
i 
j 
7 
x. 


ey 4d 


2% 


Pn ar | 


ion MEE =p 08 Deel ie eros coe 


_ booth ss «se atee 


_ Radoy's 


hoord sq Scvoy 6s 


- huey Fal este ‘eo ; vv q 


arnwoye of Va 
y hy Fay or rin tt 
“har oY < - nis 
gnyoy ft -ortut 
aaoy OL ent 
qr et Ol wine 
coor f Gf vist 
i *e¢ atcdovy aseavers 


Siiry 


anuoy = Af spout 


er bes ae 
= J 
bIGD % oi ah oD 
raw: & b BAAE 
O f Bite a9 STS sa 
ogSe"' 4 
Niro? ih 
anuoy ¥ ES sneth 
soy 2 PS atiah 
T} voy gg iy vist 
Nudy «¢ SS. why 
F i ' v ti 1 


~ a) xg 
7 a oh ‘Boy 
. 
f ‘. mo t 


| OF girl 

WOV Uh 

UO we .% : Ten 
CL vint 

¢ y CS* wiet 


Ls 


7 


De. ee iS pe ae th 
"000 COOKE BAU0NS CAIUS TOLATETC aan 


a 


Bea 


| No. in Each Location 

Officer Reporting Date Seen Brood (Township) 
Stewart, J. Ge  Juney 25 11 young Blythfield 
June 30 8 young Blythfield 


July 10 14 young Darling 
July 24 12 young Darling 
Average young per brood 11.2 


phears, E. Le May 28 6 young Oso 
May 28 4 young Oso 
June Ll 4 young Olden 
June 7 § young Olden 
June 30 7 young Olden 
Average young per brood 5.8 
Davison, R. J. June 4 6 young Kaladar 
June 22 4 young Anglesea 
July 2 4 young Barrie 
July 18 6 young Barrie 
July 23 2 young Barrie 
Average young per brood 4.4 
MacDonald, F. W. May - 9 young Tyendinaga 
Average young per brood 9 
Page, R. B. Reports no grouse brood seen in his 
patrol zone. 
Thompson, P. A. June 14 8 young South Canonto 
June 16 10 young Palmerston 
July 11 8 young Palmerston 


Average young per brood 8.2 
District Totals 


Total Broods Total Young Average Young Per Brood 
L7 297 6.3 


1OLsESoOl 


Gg tag 


bhexansyle * 


blertitty fe ¢ 


ainiizued 


m 
neabiIO 
met in) 
cra bio 
> ae: | 


i 
Bish 
oF 
5 ¢ (oo 
Si SOA 
~ “aa 
PITHES 


i HOY “Et ¢iut 


vol enexewrh etettce Biot 
re rete : oft a 


| fowd nt oP 


ts Buoy it. aS onl ss 
gruoy ee € enol *3 : 
“! aapoy at > a OL yf. ie Bie 
* geoy Sl Skah! 
boord s9¢: mse, gaeieva 


aAOy Oo. Bs yam - 
amoy d >. SS wee: 
“goavey f° OL anets 
gavoy 8 «= snub. 

snoy Vo OE any. 
booxd yeq amyvoy suatavA 


’ ent 
SS soul 
£ yiow 
BTLYY SL vist 
BAO ES yin 
howtd oq. Bnvoy egereva 


RAY 2 
BaLOY 
* BSHIOY 


V2 rt 


annoy 2 = Sk - 


oW me 
hoard taq Rowey enaTesA | 


t 


/SANOW oS Ves 3 Crit ly 
aarti OL Oe emt 


ee ay Ba Sno enetevay 


" 
ya) 


ee re ed 


” Yaten ee oes 
wt 


TWLOL 


TO 
Rr 
om 


= 1 1g JI94OOS uedTIeUy 
= T al yong dneog 1984e815 
= if iE yoeqseaueg 
= [ IE TTemMpey 
= A 1 Tee], posutmM-ueedy 
i G E eqedpteg 
ie € € 4009 uedTIeUy 
Cae 5 G peeypey 
e 9 9 Tee], pesurmM-on Tg 
G 8 8 Jdssues1ey] PEpooHy 
‘1 ie Gi fies od BY ul 7 peou-eTigng 
eer Ou ame 8 TE TE afe-uspToy uomuog 
Fee oe S g a yong peyoou-suty 
Ce 1k 1S S 6 9 yong pselTlen 
e874 ---8S LT z aE yong dneog sessey 
a7 Ol id ay 1S i ae SG CHS He iS HSM sas do Gy TS 


Leven 61, 200 acing 00 4) "Ao0=oe "Ndes| Ge=ec “Sdeg Te-o1-ades 


*soouelg WIOW - qq sesousy -— Fy sc gnoyoo]T xnots — JS °peyetaAoeiqqe oule soureu 
VOTIISTG *uoseses uedo 796[T 949 JO SHSOM SATT YSATT 9uq Butanp *szoygne 9yq Aq peqoedsut pue 
UOTZeY ULE YSeM 94d UT SZequnU Aq UseHed [TMOJZeqemM Jo ATewuMS © ST BULMOTTOJ su 


UPSET), 24. SV 
Aq 


T “OVE IMOFUELVM NOTOUY NYELSHYM HO NOTLISOdWOO SUIOddSs 


-L¢€- 


an 
tal 


> 8 
S. 3 
> ad 
; . 
+ a 
i 3 ss 
= I J 
an [ f 
a 4 ) 
—~ : p 
’ 


Tay FO 
Co yO 


oa | 


ms VIO 


ey 


a atoQae 


Bye a 


RACCOON HUNTING IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO 


by 
H. G. Lumsden 


In 1950 the sport of raccoon hunting at night with 
hounds was officially recognized in Ontario with the institu- 
mow Orsca raccoon huntang licence and a raccoon dog licence. 


Thais sport has been gaining in popularity since 
Boyandacated by the following figures on the sale of licences: 


Raccoon Hunting Raccoon Hound 
Year Licence Licence 
Se. 25)5) Zoo 
OD sey 256 
De (eo - 760 
D3 810 820 
Ie eye UD 808 


Raccoons are now harvested for their fur by 
trappers and taken for sport by hunters. The following 
table gives some of the harvest figures for the last three 
years taken from trappers returns and from the returns of 
holders of raccoon hunting licences for four southern 
Ontario Districts: 


southern Ontario Raccoon Harvest 


ty 1952-3 1953-4 1954-5 
Ee ne} 1 Ze} w se) DD 
a o 4 0) a ® ae 
4 Qy oO .- Qy oO Oo, oO 
0 OQ, pe Q, po Q, pe 
oa wo Ce © Se © eri 
(om) fe Der & Sita u Sed 
e4 set | mn ert Kel cH aaa) 
ite Erie 4130 ~- ZHOBMY THAD BinleD YAO" 
L. Huron 3236 BL7s3 BOI iS iy BOOM Mar lep 
Le Simcoe 1184 ~ 189h - 1054 673 
Lindsay L69 - 976 - Byalk 162 
TOTALS 9019 - 986 - 8911 16384 


The following tables give a summary of the 
Momcers’ returns. It will be seen that for each District 
the average annual bag of raccoons per hunter reporting 
exceeds 20. This is far above the average annual bag of 
other game. For example, the average seasonal kill of 
ducks in the Mississippi Flyway varies between 4 and 5 
per hunter and for geese, between .1 and .2. Upland game 


iw 


~*~ 
ree | 


Se © Dien 

pa tm 

el ae 
‘ 


Haz 


‘ ae + oA i 
NBOB MeL etl why 


arts 


wee 


HTYOE WL OK ITMe 


ails 


fa phy 
f r 
~ i ee See 
Puts Rs ilo ets, 
3) Pa: 
x a 
‘ 5 1G SGA 
Sea ae es | 
- - a ea ee ey 
aj 
"aly 
- 
Wa - 
5 7 to’, : 
“vise woo 28 exoocgan 
| 6 -oxogs tc") Hepa 
Lh Jeoomed Sha, 10 See 
noe ia BATH oy os - ere? +, 
rma 
ss 
t : . [ 
4 be if + tea 


“vir ' 


i shies 
mmf} t~ a, a 
nT i i 


< 


. a , 


- 


¥G 


~ 


Paver 


290 = 


figures usually run a little below ducks. There are, of 
course, far fewer sportsmen hunting raccoon than other game 
and this probably accounts in part for the high bag. 
Nevertheless, if quality of sport is partially measured by 
the size of the bag this is excellent hunting. 


The yields of raccoons in some areas also are 
high. In Lambton county in Erie District, 1619 raccoons 
were killed by hunters on 1128 square miles in 1953, giving 
peyeeld of 12.4 raccoons per square mile. In 1954, the kill 
was 974 and the yield .9 raccoons per square mile. The 
age ratio for a small sample of 35 raccoons from the 
northern part of this county was .6 juvenile males for each 
adult male. If this type of hunting does not select 
adults over juveniles and if the sample received was truly 
random this ratio certainly does not indicate over hunting. 


Lake Huron District Raccoon Returns - by W. He Cantelon 


Average 
No. of Now of "Sor No. of Noe. OF 
Licences Returns Returns Raccoons Raccoons 
Year Sold Made Received Killed Per Hunter 
1952=3 238 238 100% - 4783 ZOied: 
1953-4 322 Bee 100% (sion Zhuo 
195h=5 Zit Ani 100% {LED Pagers) 


Lindsay District Raccoon Returns - iviGre dle sate 
195h=5 20 20 100% 162 PENI, 


Lake Simcoe District Raccoon Returns - by J. S. Dorland 


1954-1955 
Ania 
NO | Ot: NOs. "OE No. Raccoons 
Licences Returns % Raccoons Per 
Area re oyiie | Made Rete Killed Hunter 
F. B. Richardson 1 a - 6 6.0 
C. Je Spencer 3 3 100% 122 40.6 
H. Van Wyck h 0 0% - ~ 
rae Armitage | Tes) aa 8h. 6% 282 AGA 
Ne Ee Sitwell 7 6 Opawy oo 9.9 
igus SLewell L 3 75% 103 31.3 
Bre. OH « Marshall L 2 50% 66 5) 3) cd) 
eaeWes iomith 3 3 100% 29 SAG 
F. Bowes it a 100% 6 6.0 
TOTAL LO 30 75% 673 POOR 


“OE 


5 , 248 S7edT aoe wolad eldtift s pi eae 
jotoo medd coosose sattatal memedteqe Tews? - 
8d dgin eft t92 greg Ak aongoone idedora e 


: eivesem & fei. req ef itoqe to yi Leop . 
attnud dogifeoxe ef ead gad Sa eid ta 
‘is coeff asete emor GE anopgosy “to ebfety edT 
“Qo07K8T CLal..cvobwerad Sita mf vdsees AOsgmeme 
<clel sit sefLin sysgee Gholi ae etecmiat Vee 
oft ,JfCL nl . Sli ersepe teq encosoes Af % 
17 siin STiBUpa “Tea BHOO! OBS ve bilefy ony ares 
iv movl enoossst ¢£ to slonse Liem eee 
“ot eoftam ei inevut Oy Baw yonuoo atit Yo oe 
toolse ton -geeb naitned to say aegis 2p 
firey aa ‘ b svisner efgnge. eat ti bas solinevyt = ee 
unt yvove eatgokbel ton ssob yintsives ofcan ae 
BGLSIUEO st eW Nd = pate a mE scirsekey EE 


b 


2 ee " a r r A 

DO > oh LO. ...08 LO R iO «Ov 

Sentara va knbet ce Gehralitober sai) ag de an accrotox 

urd te4 ‘boli sbevtsoot sham 

TE ALN ATA SSS Namely 4 + Seah RRaTORNED SIRE HME RU ete te Sar 

i 3 es 

Ais 43 Ware sd OL SS& 
. ' - G ry rs f 
\ 


alas) - 
Tre 


ea 
Sans bef P a 

5%. ; 70 ee ei Jed SI Je MmOG3s 
18 neem orton iam Tee, naan 8 Ean = 2 eK 


brefeod. 8... yoo Sate noGcsoBn, to ere Le 90.950. 


oa 8A oe ta ott : to «On 


4; 32k ‘ SVM : io g 

a = eae mncognat ies a ate em a ee lee red ©h clin, Wik sol oneny Same 
J [ sogbisnige 
E rie TOO Moep 


onadtm 
me Lowokt 
too 
Iisdetsh 
qd Bes 


SOE 


Lake Erie District Raccoon Returns, 1953-54 - by 
A. Re Streib 


No. No. No. Raccoons 
Licences Returns 4% Raccoons Per 

Area Sold Made Returns Killed Hunter 
Allan q 6 85.7 62 MOS 
Arbuthnot 20 18 90.0 276 1S 
Bailey dey 14 82.4 73 2s 
Beck 32 18 EGieie 348 IRS) 
Carter 5 3 60.0 29 Ge7 
Pounie hi 22 Pal 95.5 456 ALR) 
Greenwood 25 16 64.0 142 8.9 
Howell 16 16 100. 376 23.5 
Martin ay L7 LOO's 678 39.9 
McIntyre 29 28 96.5 813 29.0 
McKeown lh ay OO. Bley, 24.8 
Mellick 36 510) 83.3 1619 5a O 
Muma Ws) 2 CS) 362 BOs 2 
Neill 28 16 ioe 653 LO.8 
Roberts 20 20 OO, 849 Le Dies 
District 

Office ey 8 EG OAO) 236 29.5 
TOTALS 318 PAB 80.8 7TLAQ Ao 


Lake Erie District Raccoon Returns, 1954-1955 - by 
(Nae olengent © 


Anan Ost 
NO. No. No. Raccoons 
Licences Returns % Raccoons Per 

Area Sold Made Returns Killed Hunter 

El Muma 20 18 90.0 369 RORD 

E2 Avbuthnot 13 10 76.9 tee a1 917, 

E3 Howell it Ie 100 435 36.2 

E4 McKeown 19 19 100 55 B57) 

hoy Panch 19 16 Glue 2 282 WI AS 

E6 Allan 10 9 90.0 eS HS) Aa 

E7 Neill 35 Siab 88.6 703 Faroe, 

ES Beck Bie any W350 708 PASTAS 

E9 McIntyre 26 26 100 973 Bina 

E10 Mellick 28 16 Sy) all 97k 60.9 

Ell Martin 16 16 Oe 5h1 33.8 

| ime Roberts 23 23 100 1048 NA 

! E13 Carter L L 100 TIS) 2965 

j R14 Greenwood oA a BZ ely: eS a 2 

; E15 Bailey 10 LO LOO 196 ORG 
Dastrict 

Office 13 12 o2,3 187 15.6 


TOTALS 301 257 Sak 7504 AR Ce 


‘ -. 
PS ee 2 As 
ee ee 


ee? 


: Xa, Tok % 
VS me Aid 
= ‘ 
Cc \ 4 Dee AL 
~ * 
oe ie «fre mE 
‘= a 
a ¢. 
: F we bo: 
\ A ‘ ry [ eee 
. EM yf Of 
wwe tT if 
: pera \+ 
7 oot See: 
. ¢ - i <oe ait 
; c mr ‘ 
Fs \ at a bt hf ad 
P ok ry 
LO C. & IE 
5 c P 
ewe £ ts \ “ f 
® aps 
* o ' OF § Ss 
“" 
» \a ) 
ron 
‘ an « yf » 
a a Fr PSM OCS aA 
mAs peas 1 ht A RA AARON Nr BY 9 RN VST NERS AMER MNES EN 
{ rif 
sists ok v7 
fuiceah  seotsott 
be rth Hs. DLOG: 
7 pees. 8 re Aa), ciakg entree SORT <3. aoa a ana 
b | S 
ee : a A 
r ' te 7 
i S » 1 
if : Cet 
! CI 
65) 
be ff : 
’. 
\s St 
r : mF, 
{ C. 
re i oT 
[ st 
oN > 
' ”* * . 
i> ¥ 
ms tJ \ 
é d 
r 4 
a i 
24 . 
a ‘i \ 


« ie a 
ehh ys 


* BHoODDBH ® atrruson, 
| _baitis girded. obah 


-— pe ; . * ou: 


i 


eats 


- Ape criteria for raccoons have been worked out in 
Iowa by Sanderson (Methods of measuring productivity in 

raccoons. Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, 

1950). He used body weight, the length and dried weight 

of bacula of males, and the condition of genital tracts of 

' females. 


A sample of 35 bacula was collected by Mr. Streib, 


Wildlife Management Officer, Aylmer from two hunters. Mr. 
Sherwood Stephenson of Thedford and Mr. Fred Tanton of 
Watford killed these animals in Bosanquet and Warwick 
townships, Lambton County during the fall and winter of 
1954.2 Three additional ones were collected by Dr. C.H.D. 
Clarke near Toronto. These bacula were cleaned in a 
dermestid colony, dried for several weeks and then weighed 
and measured. Figure 1 shows the weight plotted against 
the length for each penis bone. Using Sanderson's Lowa 
criteria, these have been tentively classified as 22 adults 
and 16 juveniles. 


sanderson has pointed out that the dividing line 
between juveniles and adults for bacula weights is 2.0 
grams in Iowa and 2.6 grams in Missouri where the raccoons 
pecwrarser. Ihe dividing lane for lengths is 90 mm in 
Pomimavaves., It iS possible that Ontario raccoons differ 
from animals in these two states. It will be necessary 
to have known age animals and a good series of measurements 
from the province before this question can be answered. 


ng9 J. 
4 ge Ty 


Sa 


ror 
J ‘ 
Fy 
i 
( 
(aot) 


it 


ry 


awit | edlot ioe Hoveus 
Sainte: i to ebodgetl) @oenekd 
Sree ia 2 BLITEE a Ba LeAIL aa 
ddamnent any. dduiew pod) pan 
WEIL turoo: anid DNB iby: a 


} 

B . Luisa SP er AAA a : 
Tort Tecley: paps lO Sasa 
Pig SB 3) be ESO EDS fi 20 Aoen cae ree 

ae. o ' - vd ee 

a teenie pie Od 
setloo grow aeno’ Letog eSB Ravae 
arta | dgantT e4owoT 


2 " x o fi 
aT ecu ik dae oy) ee ae baa) Sa 
"eeW 4B TOVER. tO) bere vio Lome 


‘tow ord ewode & yee 


ae atled> V,otod 2 raed. Ae TOT ts 
i 


" Tyr pee beg rot Arn 
ia, Gia Syeae ve 
} my 3 ag } oh 
0 ay P } - bs 
¥ " 
: ye en { “a 
or Vt r 
he tat 4 é ne 
: [otesoa 
ayer = 
p ad ee ell | 
= i rR OD as = 
a a 


tpMrpos 


(yas (tbyels Pep) 8 Sia teh 


10 


Liles 


FIGURE I = Weight and Length of Bacula of Raccoons. 


30 


20 


Ju | S 


Length in mm. 


e Lambton County Specimens 


o Toronto specimens 


Se 


c* 


{ 


i 


3 
*.% 


—- 


‘hears 


Fe 
te 


r 
A 


om | 


oe 
| 
es See 


— 


Su. 


Ae toes 


when 


$n 


et ee te 


ental 


fi 


mf 


lie Bic 


REPORT ON THE WATERS OF THE ROB ROY TROUT CLUB 


by 
Je F. Gage 


The following report is the result of an 
investigation requested by Mr. O. G. Clarke of the Rob Roy 
Teouesotup. The club is situated om a branch of the Beaver 
River in the Township of Collingwood, Concession VIII, 

Lot 7, in Grey County. The club property encloses the 
headwaters of the creek which has no name. For the sake 
of convenience this creek will be hereafter mentioned as 
Meadowbrook Creek. 


To establish the best management possible a long 
term study of the physical, chemical and biological proper} 
ties of the stream should be undertaken. This report is 
based only on a short cursory examination and has been 
written on principles involving the general management of 
a trout stream. An effort has been made to reduce the 
number of biological terms and phrases. 


Purpose 


The purpose of this investigation was to determine 
the best method of producing trout of a larger size than 
Hare found at present. Speckled trout from eight to ten 
inches are taken but trout of larger size are the excep-= 
tion rather than the rule. 


Description 


Meadowbrook Creek commences as springs on the 
edge of the club property and runs for three miles on club 
property. The upper part is shallow and of medium flow 
being anywhere from three to six feet in width and four to 
Six inches in depth. Another branch joins the main stream 
which widens into slow moving water of two to four feet in 
depth and twenty feet in width. Some single wing deflectors 
have been placed in this section but without much success 
as the gradient is low and little current in evidence. 

Some small holes have been dug at the ends of these deflec- 
tors by spring freshets. There is considerable silt in 
evidence throughout the stream both in the slow water and 
the medium velocity further downstream. A few locations 
are fortunate in having gravel and stone bottoms. Where 
silt has been left undisturbed, beds of water cress and 
coontail have established themselves. The temperature of 
the water was found to be 58° Fahrenheit. There are 
several backwaters to the mainstream which naturally have 

a warmer temperature (64° F.). These may be utilized to 


vad CUORT Rie aOR 20 CH OE iO 


rd, : Ro) 


Uses) ot abi: = 


te Yo tfhireee) Geet er stays at ee 
Oi OO} 0. SRA iei0) wie: wh? 20% ¥¢G DOPE 
590 off. to dove 6 fepedercee Be ap “gti 
fT: FO  boowgat Ais" io ‘qiteewntes 
SLons ever ‘Gato e ae: adie We 

En sade 4 ,3re? ach Bat ah Cow ie fek=s vel ony 
“hetofinoen Sep ewes sn ae 4oapa” weet ae 
| aoe: 


wen eet Soe ignidavas 


> eae fs f pean AS: : $ 
~<vworny -[soinolo be ire. Lao teerted 4b ee eee ‘te 
; ren? Seas sere age ad b Leeita Lao aia 
Jn oD EO EME. riohtHe tore Oy aie 4 
! We See mas ga STURT Lowes aplarons ae 1D ¢ 
: yey Cape Boe deciles fi » OSS é 
rein Seen febanu te 
2 Bebe! eae a heetee, abe a ° baa 
Fe ro mote’ Gites de: bool e:) — aeneeammna - 


—Troxecackt See pHa areal pe, TO 


fos ort Sree 


vo auntuan ts geelgimes) foo aaa 
eli. sorta 2) AMUET e Yieatt ion duloy 
co) omethinm 95° fas west a Sec eee 
iw rt See ‘= of oor tics te aie 
b gitot gone seasons erste tc ©: Ras 
aa : cSarcne, Wem oS tr = 
BODE \ Suodtiw- gid edie ae. elie beh 
CRM ES Oris ted treme axes olin aio! > nae ed ea 


dur bteden a) SIOR® | Goleta a r. 
ee i hiyet Ae ore. Sekai 2 + 

raps Lordhewoh aii Ve foo coin 

rt ro ‘bop eevee Se Set coe oon sits 
; body hagas baa Tae ae 
yfenialt bane iio tees 

Me Lo beni ot lek OS de Oa Snieie a ee 


od. Bre snuiud’ 


: tig “ere dkey Soot eae eee 
oe )) é wat ; Te af ( as O.Ar.) cyeve rebar Maret re) De 


™~ 


shel 


good advantage as described later. The large numbers of 
Speckled Trout observed throughout the entire stream 
point up the fact that the water must be suitable to this 
Species. ; 


Food 


Food is the number one requirement for good 
growth in trout. From observations made it would seem 
that food is the real problem. A common but erroneous 
conception is that all water must contain quantities of 
little organisms upon which fish can feed. Speckled trout 
inhabit cold pure spring water, which because of its 
coldness and pureness is relatively barren of these small 
organisms as compared to warm marshy lakes. These small 
water plants and animals are only the first link ina 
Succession of food sizes. By this we mean that we must 
have these organisms to feed the minute insect life, the 
minute insect life must be present to feed the larger 
forms of insects, the larger forms of insects must be 
present to feed minnows and put growth on young trout, 
the minnows and very large insects must be available if 
we are to have those big trout that are necessary to good 
fishing. 


Food is controlled by temperature and the type 
of water such as standing, medium or fast~-flowing. The 
main stream had a temperature of 580 F., while this is not 
excessively cold, it would not produce the same volume of 
food as water 659 F. The size or volume of the food is 
most important. For example a minnow or dragon-fly larvae 
would produce more growth in a trout than would hundreds of 
small insects with a total comparable volume. A great 
deal more energy is exerted in capturing the hundreds of 
small insects. 


There are several backwaters on this stream which 
could be partially isolated as potential nurseries for the 
rearing of minnows for food. By partial or complete 
isolation the water temperature could be raised to 75° F. 

A small amount of fertilizer might be added and minnows 
introduced. Some brush should be thrown around the edges 
tO protect the young minnows from kingfishers etc. It 

will also provide a suitable place upon which the minnows 
can spawn. When the young minnows have reached an inch 

or longer the screen or barricade could be removed. The 
temperature will prevent the trout from entering the minnow 
pond but the young minnows will eventually enter the stream 
tipsearch Of food. They will then provide food for the 
trout and should induce better growth than you are experien- 
Cing at present. Fertilizing the stream would be very 
impractical as most of your nutrient value would soon be 
carried downstream by the current. 


Yodnin spel ed? Gaede hed eroesee 6 
useide onteal eid Juangsosds Hawies: 


e ow dai sin sw eitd vy .eeste Boo 


od wiser A $9%e Jada cyotd,. aid soon dg: aM, 


mahub~ 


soc tue ef Jaum sagew ake gM, 408% oma a 


— 
ote 


: a ce 


OS “tO7 QA typos wo eden. slg BE ae 
iC shem emorvavisedD. mow cae 
is duc Momma &. * Mie ttoG: faa eit. a 
insup mkacoes eur todaw. toes: tods Skt 
Te: he! fis * ef .r tos Ty wn sau ete, : 
o seugoed doidw <a dtew Seige ees eee 
( to corisd yiovigelot al exereteG 
eGSR6L VAS We Howhsaies es Sm 
fl gauk? seld eine eve eLeptee eee 


> 
<— 


race ae SEES Site paper od aie Laps sos ‘Be 
it boot oo $1SRSq i ad joi “atest cf 


cum agdeeat to sittct. seated Sac cee 
agp ; at pete ae Bio ~aad Se ae east 
i Sat Lene &> 2 te tah Aided Sw ut EGS. bso 


oe a71sL “WYSv. goon 


eit Bin tekine d wel Bs! apes et 
P Li-tep WIESE «A BIE 
i TES BITE ae aD 
Tet? powbort. Jon. DEiow Sage 
ait egy) © : Oa; 
YO wonnle o-s loess Ae | 


c § 7 ET ie NGS } : ; 
ad Blues atgd¢axeqmed ay ava ‘odd, 
s Gh Seis toni Livigt 3 
Wo’ G bivens deswd 
+ ea i ny mM Sry 
: a ee Lak. A : 
NoGAat, SVG. SWS sie eae 
qi if poee sheared. ia tie 208 | Bogs 
eet saat on ‘igh ‘Inaved {fives a 
t; : CL by is" SAUCY od 


Set to 


; iY : * m4 at te re as ne sd. ee Mors i. Nitta tone ie 


ey! ed aaree lh? Seema 3 rps & 
eh £OSD TAD §e ed a Lt ae 0 Uateees a 
is OSI Tero ekg eikalt ag . 
, ay Me r ae 
Ligte ets. t Tes Ts isaTwo 
ng - 
¥ a su Rese 


— ee 


Sipe 
silt 


im various Sections of the stream there is a 
serious silting problem. Due to the fact that the gradient 
is very low the current cannot be used either by itself 
or by constructed wing deflectors to remove the silt. The 
silt must be removed manually either by shovels or some 
dredging equipment. If such steps are taken to remove 
this silt it should be taken well away from the stream as 
melting snows and heavy rains would soon carry it back to 
the stream, oSilt is detrimental in that it smothers out 
many of the more desirable types of aquatic life and 
covers potential spawning beds. 


Cover 


It would appear from the large number of fry and 
fingerlings evident in the stream that cover is ample. 
Comparing this stream with others of similar nature there 
is considerable cover in the form of brush, logs, bank 
vegetation and water cress. Cover should be present only 
im surticient quantity to afford protection for the number 
of trout which the stream will support. When cover is in 
excess then more trout are protected than there is enough 
hood swO prouuce proper growth. Your section of the stream 
is inclined towards the latter condition. 


Weeds 


Weeds are attributed to two factors in this 
stream, the low velocity and the silt it accumulates. When 
weeds become established in a layer of silt they contribute 
VemnuUrcenee Siilting by acting as a net or strainer for silt 
particles coming downstream. Weeds are not a serious 
problem in the stream, however, where they are contributing 
tO excessive silting they should be thinned out. 


mereen or Grate 


A screen or grate would merely act as a safeguard 
for the planting of larger trout such as two year olds. 
These trout would then be confined to your property and 
you would be able to determine the value of the stocking. 
It would be only natural to suppose these fish had gone 
downstream if you did not have a screen and you caught 
only a few. It is suggested that the grating should be as 
large as possible to reduce the amount of flotsam that is 
bound to accumulate. The grate should be removed at the 


end of each fishing season and replaced just before stocking. 


Your grate should be located with two factors in mind. 

(1) Accessibility (the cleaning of the grate will be a 
€onstant chore): (2) a site which will allow a certain 
amount of flooding due to accumulation on the grate. It 


: 
& . 
~*~ 
s , 
+ 
: 
6 


eta 
we a8 


* 


Wows 


wast od ed | Ps espe 


ru. 


.« 
hope ALA? RAEAy eS Se ee 
s(i3. (LE nea her eo ee 
ES; nie Lhe tits ceiok Behe: 


: 
ford 
TYE } 
— ¢ 
" { ~ ein 
Be aks ; +. . 


‘wanda! riage, SEY 


Shot: BAL, 
1b nit By" hago 
pa 3 bavesier adi 


Itsy gas ee pe pe 


whee ee et te eet 
ey, Sage 2 BAS ae 
sth he SF iw ey A ia 
Tee a 7 i) hee de ee rei i 
is Me AR Tao Bw NARS) RD alli Tso olay 
peng an MES Te here eto pe Re 
ge AV Rhames Sct Leak OMI 0 OAR OY Cw Po Ws re awp os 
pote AU SS cer ie | ee 
Ms SHPO Ves oes 4 5% Sat o 
3 S SG Vi eee ee Tog o Sie 
a " ; vEY 
with. Oni aee fey ahead | 
¥ - lex ! 7 
i oe Ss % 
fs ~ 
" 72 5 
hy may 
my fy g 
! a 
] 
oaks F ‘a 
i ; ayia” ‘ 
i 3 
é SORE Li 
ry 7g 7 
| 
it C eG a ales “4 ‘t As # 
aj At ’ pba 
E Ge ras bp ME BP i 
P a ee hin es 
* : 4 12 PS pi 
' ie a9 
: ; ay 


“be 


might be wise to place the grate well back from the road 
to reduce tampering by outside individuals. I understand 
you received permission to screen this stream from the 
Department some years ago. 


otream Improvements 


The success of deflectors depends upon the 
gradient and resulting velocity of the water. There are 
two ideal locations for double-wing deflectors. One just 
below the boat house, the other above what is known as 
the "Pot Hole.* The wings of these deflectors should be 
set at an anglé from the bank so that they will not reduce 
the natural velocity which is good at these points. A 
two foot gap between the ends of the deflectors should be 
ample. The sheeting should be as leak-proof as possible. 
This should produce a good hole immediately below the 
installation. More oxygen will be produced plus a more 
desirable type of insect life. 


Diversion 


A plan was outlined to divert the water through 
an old original stream bed. This bed contains some water 
PuamMGUamotutes Of Silt.—in diverting the water this silt 
might be removed but would no doubt settle further down- 
Sepeate Many aquatic insects spend from two to four years 
in various stages of development as larvae in the water 
before maturing. To divert the water from its present 
course would cause a setback in food supply for several 
years. There appears to be no advantage in diverting this 
watere 


Restocking. 


As stated before there is evidence of sufficient 
year classes to support the fishing pressure exerted. The 
problem is to promote better growth rather than to increase 
the numbers. It would, therefore, be impractical to stock 
fish of a size that is already present. The plan to stock 
two year olds seems good. This would be merely on a “put 
and take" basis. I would suggest that you take steps in 
the form of an experiment to determine the desirability of 
stocking with two year olds. The trout should be planted 
sometime in the second week of May after you have installed 
your screen. The trout should be marked for future 
identification by clipping the adipose fin as described to 
Mr. Clarke. This will enable you to differentiate between 
stocked fish and natural fish. By keeping careful records 
of the number of stocked fish you can easily evaluate this 
programme. 


we 


{salt 


» Steere. avou te yLTSt LAP agicy in a ont 
3 oe wa 


756 


& my 
sta 


Ww 


ig Ns 


L OVE 


PUP EM iB 


ray Q fav: He ‘' 


» ¥ 
~ a 7 r . 
ov mci Ip hae ewe rity) 


Hts 
> J iw wes 
say sf . 
Her at ; 
} ns 
i bes 
y= : 
J ee & he 
Nad pen I oe 
a) Cla eT fw) 2 ne es 
{Me j bor) ties et 
Cee oe 
" Voi 
: P 
r 
+ 
a Bales 
it} As 
ie 
ie ' = 
‘ att P Hei g 
aoe’ 
} 
| 
d 
yd 
4 “ft Es 
i i 
; t 
Ff : 


. 
ee | 
¥ 

ik 
' 
: 
r\s 
* 
© 


, ve +e 5 the + 


L\) Fo SE TY ee 


Arad. she 


‘Wo few. 


Siyah Su? 


re) are eh ba 


add: bade Jou Bea 
eeu it obletuor ¢ eth ae 
gbddt Reete (Od oteRmmean 


Oar aay aoe 


4 Se eons 4 


fy. ee 534) ih La 


a dnote oem 
ex aes 

pd 18d Les 
Eirece M Bates) 


bist - 
meet. 
Phi tools 
raed jad: ¢ 
SEC To ars se 


OE) ae 
ete eae it 
oto’ 72. ea 
at v6 oT?  .an te 
(toe 8 ae 
tee, sed . 


he trout and other data provide 
ONS Gc PeGlOd OL years. |! rom 
a sound management programme. 


atte poten’ ees ina 


¢. oe 


t qcomegaam bre S| ‘ABE COntoe 


10 bes) dated gat Yo ameee 
o halt iff T3v0 nolepanot 


a 


Eee 


THE MANAGEMENT OF GAME FISH 


by 
SiS lags WikelGieab atjaKoral 


it seems difficult to realize that little over 
300 years ago Ontario exhibited an extraordinary richness 
of vegetation perhaps unequalled elsewhere in the temperate 
part of the world. The productivity of the land was matched 
by that of the many waters which supported almost unbeliev- 
able numbers of fish as attested in the accounts of the 
early explorers and travellers. 


Unfortunately, with the advance of civilization 
there was no realization that the treasures of forest and 
stream were exhaustible and the dominating interference 
of man soon disrupted the balance of nature which had 
Characterized the land for untold millions of years. With 
the gradual settlement of the land and the tremendous 
increase in population the pristine abundance of fish, 
particularly stream fish, decreased rapidly. It would 
seem that the decreasing fish population received little 
attention until the 1850*s when the attention of Samuel 
Wilmot, the father of Canadian fish culture, was directed 
towards the declining number of salmon in the streams 
flowing into Lake Ontario. Wilmot responded by construc- 
ting the first fish hatchery in Canada near Newcastle 
On the shore of Lake Ontario. Although fish culture 
Practices developed slowly from this early start, it was 
Many years betore the possibility of the scientific 
Management of fishing waters was realized. The importance 
of fisheries management has only recently been magnified 
to its present publicity by the cry for conservation which 
has been manifested throughout North America. 


With the changes in environmental and economic 
conditions which accompanied the advance of civilization 
the position of fish has become greatly modified from the 
time of early colonization when fish were regarded primarily 
a@sra source Of food and formed an important part in the 
daily food of the people. As the years passed certain 
Species of fish became recognized for the sporting qualities 
exhibited during their capture and, although eaten with 
delight, their value as food might be considered over- 
shadowed by the pleasure derived from their capture. And 
so eventually certain species became segregated into a 
group termed “game fish" in contrast to the group of 
“commercial fish" which were in demand solely as food. 
ities, to che former group that our attention’ will be confined 
although certain species play a dual role as both a game 


: “ “t rh 
Hela | 70, 9. EATOARAN a 
= ot oY > y 
. ed ey ae 
' SOME LIO att Velbon “ 
a s Mee a ) 


jo Ye anu at 
} acai of asad 23h 2 
foupsow eqettea ae 


i Bi od Te Wty ioothomy od? -hivow 
y ts s bomegqve Coidw etsJAW em alee 


pede. wk hadaudits ee a LY Toame 
ae eteLlleaverd- CHE “eteme 


fe hide O - VDF Gig i + iw : di 7 FRUIT. t 20200) 
DiS eer O. ey 2¢ eas: Shy Geos sg Lisst one 
Seer es O ae | 9) Ey SEP £ TS ATR “s Le ‘Std i: Beyeruys cto : V 

oe | - ; iy Rete Uae | S354 twiea es ef 4: “be que Ea y, eS 

OLE blotter so ‘bog sd. beg 
io- Bae baad aad te 2 TAMs (I3ae < 


. » ee . i" — ee a a Wee ¢ f - a 
¢: wes etlariug et Otis tes 
fe - hae - st Urey a . M 5 

a P ae : 


ae 


i te Rite eee syoep oRetIe. 
oy r i ay ‘3 ww Kon fy 
; ofaaiuaog ct oa hesesosh Sie 
iY oe vir 


le mo hatodes iw & OGL eta) 
Ww. Uiitioe eR as theceo: Soothe 

tek Rom fae, "be ear ae hea sul 
po eee f aiaey a rm 


Ha BENS. govt. Yiwole pees 
Ae At aah ri; LLaGLevod” ete soa Ted . 

" Dos Lipo paw Brodie SOkaeas to. 
. "i “rl ets San | aA © Reem, 

ey bat tee Fe 3 & 


eT: OCS Oring 23207 Bae 


DOW LVAR Hl BORGO Bie ee 
pbs av” So iiueomesos) oan 

fs-cary 2) Boy ws raf eae ty! pas) sh Ks to nok +E 
o He wie NOR SAG mee tiase & 


DCH eM: to + 


ir) 


| -ydlaceq sid. Oumme : 

( Lo Bos Stoo ne. ds2ed fers: tos 
j <2 4G 0) Bt doo aheoe al 

wot . F oh rhea . ag Riad be ray Aa ch ee ey Cel tists 

fs |, Pov ge arte ys ee id § 

BOG Mo Edens. oe tes ties A ute 

ee ay: Lato; hodriw 4 pee ree 
% » Cea dia Parse a pt stot ad py si 


a 


ba OF 8 RA ME L9S8dea ieBeteo eee! 


== 


fish and a commercial fish. The Ontario Government recog- 
nized the importance of game fish in 1903 with an order-in- 
council which prohibited the sale of these species. Each 
year now fisheries laws were passed, and old ones modified, 
culminating in the present fisheries regulations which 

set aside closed seasons, limit the number of each species 
Which may be caught, and set minimum lengths for many 
species. 


With an ever increasing demand on the fishing 
resources it is necessary that those involved in fisheries 
work critically examine those practices now employed and 
evaluate their use in the successful management of fishing 
waters. It is no secret that a great deal of what is being 
called successful fishery management lacks any clearly 
successful practice. Even the assessment of the results 
of any fisheries management programme in itself poses a 
difficult problem in an aquatic environment characterized 
by complexity, diversity and changeability. Although the 
Quateesy Of fish caught is the final criterion, successful 
management can only result from an accurate knowledge of the 
fish populations at all other stages as well as at the stage 
of capture for use. 


The objectives of a successful fish management 
programme must be (1) to make the best possible use of 
available waters to produce as large a population of 
desirable fish as possible, (2) make the fish which are 
produced as available as possible to the angler, (3) 
increase the stock of those species in demand by anglers to 
a Meximum, (4) provide an equitable distribution of the fish 
resources when practical, (5) carry out those technical 
projects, either research or otherwise, which will assist 
i” whe assurance of a continuous production of game fish 
for angling, (6) formulate and enforce such fisheries laws 
as are biologically and economically sound, and (7) through 
public education implant a definite and practical conserva- 
Gaon autitude in the minds not only of anglers but of all 
Citizens, particularly guides and resort owners so dependent 
on fish resources. 


Unfortunately, the development of successful 
fisheries management cannot be expected to happen overnight 
but may take years to realize. Fisheries biology is still 
a@ rather new field of study and lacks knowledge of many 
fundamental principles in certain fields which delays 
progress in discovering the factors responsible for unfavour- 
able conditions for each species, in devising procedures 
to remedy the mal-conditions, and finally in perfecting the 
procedures. in general it is necessary to study the fish 
in nature rather than in the laboratory, and, with nature's 
iyncaiine COMplexiby, 1b 1S Obviously difficult to discern 


7 


sh 


ak ee 
“e.% 
pag 
F j xt 
an ye 
; 
ra 
ae 
i - 
t} “ 
We 
a 


yt 

f ‘ 
Md Yo BIBS sit be SECT Ape 
WE , RE SET" Sey dined 25 a itet oH 
joy. Re P TORE lh tages, "aig pf ant 
Samu SAT, TEMES gestos Aue Bs aoLa\s sy a) 


nx) ent deh ‘tatereee 
Ah ome £0. meee 


eu Tl!) abet ode seneb es iy vewes 
: =| } dds Hee BG, if rj t f Fes “i EURO Bess 


_ 3 4 f ’ ry 
rt POLE: “1G vw 
aod F essed be +i: We ter ey 
LD tee yh Peet |e Keac BOSSY 
. Sean ‘oe y 
hy bay, Ooi ale ed ° -_- 
Oo my at at eit 5A m4 - f — 
Te A YE J a err OE Mu: We 
6 it ‘ . : 
xc d in? “idee 
ry mh 5 ‘ re 7 me a = ¢ 
- Ut Ca re gt 5 a me ur? ©) 
* +h o ‘ fa 
’ = AGT me pare | t a 
we a“ we A “ee 
| isd oe i Leone 
i GRE a habe 
iste tr eaiyt 
Piles 4 3s ft 
4 *. ane + Py 
f ‘ US Mid dee 
re ye 
- I f i ryt terry 
; so 
+ eran 
Fal Pap Sod vet 
r ' 
\ . t 
ond 
jf pail Be 
5s go ee ge 
> ' 
; a " 
ui . 
=) pT a * 
ea) wh : 
ee 4 gist ke Lata ele: Ppt pad 
a , pe rs 
Sic a Ivy i ix 'b 7. ear ee Be 
"fs E+) | ENG a‘ 
ri eS 
de > 
f aay fr) 2 
} ree Se are Hi 
j j ara Dake 
f 
* o ° 
7 
. : 
’ ’ , 
is 
‘: 
H 
j i 
ae ' 
i i 
se 
t : 
4 ey 
4 
ryry 
wae 
‘ 
: : ry oN 
~~ 
‘ h 
{ RU 
{ re 
! ’ be ag 
j ik 
' 
> oa 
rea) reel 
' 


=50= 


what factor or factors in nature may be responsible for the 
peculiar behavior of each species of fish. A knowledge of 
the fundamental behavior of each species in movement, 
reproduction, feeding, and the like, is most necessary to 
interpret any fishery. Although a fisheries practice with 
predicted and verified results has seldom, if ever, been 
found for any kind of freely roaming fish, considerable 
information is being accumulated which should eventually 
result in successful fisheries management. 


Through an increased emphasis on fact-finding in 
fisheries work, considerable light has been shed on the 
value of methods presently employed in fisheries management. 
It is now proposed to discuss somewhat superficially both 
those methods which have been in vogue for many years and 
several of the newer methods initiated in an attempt to 
improve management. 


For many years the management of fishing waters 
was more-or-less dependent on two practices, regulations - 
the formulation and enforcement of fisheries laws, and a 
stocking programme. One of the most important objectives 
in the development of a successful fisheries management must 
be a critical examination of both practices to determine 
the degree to which they are biologically sound and to modify 
EReePraccr1ces tO conform to existing conditions. 


A survey of fisheries regulations shows that many 
of the laws were set up arbitrarily with little factual 
basis. Laws were enforced which were merely copied from 
Sedemeolaces with lattlle or no comsideration. In recent 
years fisheries workers have emphasized the evaluation of 
existing fishing laws and their alteration according to 
Peoven Meed., This work has resulted in the realization 
that no one set of standard regulations can be used to 
manage different bodies of waters, each with its peculiar 
characteristics. Although only initial investigations have 
been made along this line, the results have already indicated 
tae Mecessity for changes in the minimum lengths for certain 
e@eetes Or Tish, for a revision of closed seasons and the 
tike, As modifications in existing laws must be based on 
Conelusive facts which may require years of study, no radical 
changes may be expected. 


For many years fish stocking was regarded as the 
general answer to fishing problems although actual evidence 
of its effectiveness was generally lacking. Investigations, 
minawselocsing that the costly artificial production and 
stocking of fish has not resulted in the anticipated return, 
have caused a revaluation of stocking practices. In spite 
Peace conclusions Of Certain investigators that the re- 
stocking of waters with species already there is not only 


oad 


rk. 


Pre 


ber 


YON raevem nf 


> anods 4 At 50. 


iS. 36 @atesge close Tor tobvene 
e¢ivede dose 2O satveted: Cotas 
at eR ihenisth euteey Poe 
me, 4 R Pade Se LA. p NRE Rca VAG 
af Lee a Put SVLNROY = i Ta - Ba | 
ALD BMEMeOY dag te bata. Kae 
i> No fow Dowel iaoos aoe ieee 
ie eh SLSd at aN I: SAF eer : | 3 


ROY rl, 


} io daebesqab tad 
ae : GES ers a9 te id 
i Al ntfs: Tao, 
ie . : nee bine he 
Cf ( 
' 7 
x 
en Pe y 
iy 
Li 
) wl \ 
; 7 4 
‘ <} 
My ¢ < 
LB Lets 
i WE i! 


=5 hm 


unsatisfactory but even harmful, the policy widely adopted 
has been to change from wide, indiscriminant plantings to 
practical plantings in only those waters in which it is 
warranted. Although many waters are stocked more for the 
psychological value than for known biological value, 
hatchery=raised fish, particularly speckled trout, have 

been used extensively to populate depleted waters and 
provide fishing in heavily fished areas. Further, hatchery- 
raised stock has been used extensively to introduce suitable 
species of fish both to those waters which are no Longer 
biologically suitable for the native species and to newly 
constructed ponds, a practice employed in the majority of 
fish management programmes. 


The two foregoing well-established practices are 
gradually being supplemented by the utilization of an 
increasing number of methods in the management of fresh- 
water resources. The importance of environmental conditions 
has been emphasized. With this has come the realization 
that the productivity within the aquatic environment is 
directly or indirectly dependent on the terrestrial environ- 
ment and that successful fisheries management may result 
only from a wise conservation policy embracing land and 
water alike. 


] P yi ; 
| OA gl Ae PN Sedo 
Or ant, ~ vi Ay 
al U : i 


e P ' 
6 Ea ¢ ot x be 
Me * . - f > id 
. { 
’ th : i tot em oe 
} J ; 
4 ww Ge pe = ep ' 
t 
. + = ‘ 
5 re yee 2 “3 \ 
we Ca Aw Z 


. a ¥ 
. Pe ‘ 
e P 
ees 1 r 
ee " or 
4 
~ ? i 
= - a 
mete Ss 
say 
ath 
Mr j 
t 
‘ 
nF, 
L 
1 
= » Cael 
= ct SE Be tee f 
Pot eA 
pm ere ree ne 
- ; Ee CTONSS 9 
: ohes a Bees 4+} ae 
; fe ae 
t fia F 
: JOO 
Or sy 
mt 
i t 
~ ry 
et 
i ww te 
t 
1 1 


» 
A Re 
bon 
te 
i 
x y 
t 
t 
{ r 


- 
a 


HG 


Spa ePreal seas 
Tht 


Bt: 
: